The URL can be used to link to this page

Documents 11/19/2002 RBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER t9, 2002 NapLes Daily Ne~s Naples, FL 34102 A~fidavit of Publication HapLes Daily flews BOARD OF CCU~;TY 30MM[SSIONEkS CHERI LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 00,230 20021~ 58555938 NOTICE Oi~UBLIC MEET State of Florida County of Co!lief Before the undersign~ authority, ~er~nally appeared B. L~mb, uho on oath say~ ~' ~t she serves as Assistant ~orporate Secretary oi Daily t~ew~, ~ daily .,~wspa~er published at Naples, in Collier County, ~orida: that the attached cop% of aCvertising ~a~ published in ~id n~wspaper en ~t~$ listed. Affian[ further says that tha sa~ Naples 3aily News is a n~wspaper published at Naples, in sa~d Collier C~nty, FLorida, and the~ the said newspaper has heretotore beer~ continuously published in sai~ Collier County, Florida, each day and has b~e~ entered as ~econd class mz~l matter at ~he post office in Eaples, in sale Collier County, Flor;da, f,~r a per~od of I year next preceding the f~rs~ publication of the attached copy of advertisemen[; and affiant further says that ~he has n~ither paid nor promised any perscn, fi,'~ or corporation any discount, rebate, commission o~ refund for the purpose ~ securing this advertisement for public, ion in th~ said PUBLISHED Oti: I'~/17 AD SPACE: 59.000 INCH FILED 0~: 1' /1~/02 Personally known by ~:;e ~AJ~'-IY-'C~ .~,.~ ~fy C ,mm~s~ on C"D058336 · (,~ ~c E.~p?es S~; ~embe~ 1 ~, 2005 -~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Tl~esdov, November 19, 2002 9:00 AoMo Notice Is hereby given that ~he Collier Ceuntv Beard of' .Ceuntv Commis- sioners wfll meet in Baard~ Chambers on Third Fionr of the W. lng F) at the Collier ~ournv Government Com- plex, 3301 East Tamiaml conduct - Iler County at the above so~des of ~e agendo for meeting will be mod~ BuBdlml. Any person who decides to ameal a decision of ~ls. Board will need a recera the proceedings Imer- raining thereto, and ~nerofore may .~. to en- sure that a ve~..m re.- cord of ~e proceea~ .n~s.~s made, v~lch recora in~ dudes the ~sflmonv evidence tmon which agjmeal IS tim be basecL BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS{ONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I James N. Coleffa, J Chairrnan | DWIGHT E. BROCK, | CLERK | BY:./s/Maureen Kenyon COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA November 19, 2002 9:00 a.m. NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 99-22 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY 1 November 19, 2002 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (239) 774-8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. SWEARING IN OF COMMISSIONERS COYLE AND HALAS BY JUDGE LAWRENCE MARTIN. B. Pastor G. Dale Benson, Naples First Church of the Nazarene 2. AGENDA AND MINUTES A. Approval of today's regular, consent and summary agenda as amended. (Ex Parte Disclosure provided by Commission members for summary agenda.) Approved and/or Adopted with changes - 5/0 B. October 22, 2002 - Regular Meeting Approved as presented - 5/0 3. SERVICE AWARDS 4. PROCLAMATIONS A. Proclamation to recognize November 24-30 as National Farm City Week. To be accepted by Mr. David Santee. Adopted - 5/0 B. Proclamation to observe December 1, 2002 as National World AIDS Day. To be accepted by Andrea Taylor, Betty Ford and Betty Aubut. Adopted - 5/0 5. PRESENTATIONS A. Presentation by the United Arts Council of Collier County to present the Collier County Cultural Assessment and Plan. 2 November 19, 2002 Presented- 6. PUBLIC PETITIONS Ae Public Petition Request by Mr. Jim Kramer as received via facsimile. County Attorney to look at current policy and Sunshine Law re: orientation of new commissioners; County Attorney to provide memo concerning duplication costs. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Ae This item has been continued from the September 10, 2002 BCC Meeting. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. VA-2002-AR- 2015 Austin White, of Becker and Poliakoff, P.A., representing unit owners of the Manatee Resort Condominium Association, requesting relief in the RT Zoning District from the 500 square foot maximum size for a hotel unit set forth in LDC Section 2.2.8.4.7.2.1, to allow four (4) units of the total 19 as-built units to have 3,200 square feet of floor area (includes 550 square foot lanai) and to allow 15 units to have 2,625 square feet of floor area (includes 543 square foot lanai), for property located at 9566 Gulfshore Drive, further described as the North 50 feet of Lot 14 and all of Lots 15 and 16, Block B, Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit 1, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 9, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Variance request denied - 4/1 (Commissioner Halas opposed); Additional density to be utilized for a one time only situation; staff to ensure that utilization of right-of-way will not be permitted in future action; all action to be in compliance with the LDC and not limited to impact fees or tourist tax; s taft to move forward with SDP revisions from a commercial facility to a residential facility and impact fees to be assessed - 5/0 8. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Ae This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition PUDA-01- AR-431, James G. O'Gara representing Park East Development Ltd., requesting a rezone from "PUD" Planned Unit Development to PUD for the purpose of amending the Founders Plaza PUD to allow additional small- 3 November 19, 2002 scale retail land uses only on those parcels that exceed 150 feet in depth for property located on the North and South sides of Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) and at the Santa Barbara Canal Crossing in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Continued to December 17, 2002 Meeting - 5/0 Be This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners adopt amendments to the Capital Improvement Element; Transportation Element; and Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the "Concurrency" Amendments, DCA No. 02-2. Ordinance 2002-60 Adopted with changes - 5/0 Ce This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Public Hearing to consider adoption of an Ordinance establishing the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 (CDD2) pursuant to Section 190.005, Florida Statutes. Ordinance 2002-61 Adopted 5/0 Moved from Item #17A D. Petition PUDA-2002-AR-2566, Robert Mulhere of RWA, Inc., representing J.E.D. of Southwest Florida, Inc., and Colony Corporate Center, Inc., requesting an amendment to the "Pelican Marsh" Planned Unit Development (PUD), for the purpose of increasing the allocation of Medical Office Space allowed from 9,000 square feet to 26,000 square feet within the approved overall general office leaseable floor area of 295,800 square feet for property located North of Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 901) and East of Livingston Road, in Sections 25, 27, 34, 35 and 36, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, and Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion item to DOA-2002-AR-2567. Continued to December 17, 2002 meeting - 5/0 Moved from Item #17B E. Petition DOA-2002-AR-2567, Robert Mulhere of RWA, Inc., representing J.E.D. of Southwest Florida, Inc., and Colony Corporate Center, Inc., requesting an amendment to the "Pelican Marsh" Development of Regional Impact (DRI) for the purpose of increasing the allocation of Medical Office Space allowed from 9,000 square feet to 26,000 square feet within the 4 November 19, 2002 approved overall general office leaseable floor area of 295,800 square feet and to correct a Scrivener's Error contained within the Development Order for property located North of Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 901) and East of Livingston Road, in Sections 25, 27, 34, 35 and 36, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, and Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion item to PUDA-2002-AR-2566 Continued to December 17, 2002 meeting - 5/0 Moved from #17C F. Request that the Board of County Commissioners adopt an Ordinance amending Collier County Ordinance No. 2001-76, as amended, which created the Livingston Road Phase II Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit; providing for amendment to Section Six to increase the number of members who serve on the Advisory Committee from five to nine; providing for amendment to Section Six to limit membership on the Advisory Committee to three members from each subdivision or community; providing for inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances; providing for conflict and severability; and providing for an effective date Ordinance 2002-62 adopted w/changes - 5/0 9. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 10. Ae Discussion regarding the revision of the sign ordinance to allow for neon open signs at establishments. (Commissioner Fiala) No action Bo Discussion regarding evening Board of County Commissioner Meetings. (Commissioner Henning) No action COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT Ae Be Approve a Revised Right-of-Way Permit and Inspection Fee Schedule for the Transportation Operations Department. (Norman Feder, Administrator, Transportation Division) Res. 2002-479 - Adopted 5/0 Consider request for funding from Tourism Alliance of Collier County in approximate amount of $10,000 to terminate its corporate affairs. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) 5 November19,2002 Co Deleted D. te Fe Ge Approved as a valid public purpose-3/O (Commissioners Henning and Halas out) Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding to establish an area of mutual concern within which both the City of Marco Island and Collier County will be provided a courtesy review of proposed Land Development Projects involving Incorporated and Unincorporated Areas along the SR 951 and CR 92 corridors within five miles of the Marco Island City Limits. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) Approved - 5/0 Review Tourist Development related advertising and promotion invoices, determine expenditures serve a public purpose, approve appropriate invoices for payment in the amount of $14,850.47 from Fund 194 Reserves, and deny payment of invoice in the amount of $3,857.00, as recommended by the Tourist Development Council. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) Request approval and funding of two (2) full time positions to establish a Tourist Development Department, as recommended by the Tourist Development Council. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) Approved (not to exceed $200,000) - 5/0 Transfer $35,000 of funds from Utility Regulation Reserves to fund outside legal services in support of Resolution 2002-428 opposing the Acquisition of the Marco Island/Marco Shores Utility System by the Florida Water Services Authority. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) Approved - 5/0 Award a Construction Contract under the Fixed Term Annual Contracts for the North County Water Reclamation Facility Oxidation Ditches Improvements, Project 73251. (Jim DeLony, Administrator, Public Utilities) Copies of complete back-up information will be available November 18, 2002 in the Communications and Customer Relations Department, First Floor, W. Harmon Turner Building, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL. 6 November 19, 2002 Awarded to D.N. Higgins Inc. in the amount of $483,955 and to HoleMontes in the amount of $130,000. -5/0 Added H. ' Approve budget amendment and dredging contract for Wiggins Pass Emergency Maintenance Dredging, in the total amount of $340,000. (Staff request.) Approved - 5/0 Moved from 16K1 I. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners adopt and ratify the termination of a Lawsuit against a Collier County Employee, which sought reimbursement of a debt owed to the County by the Employee in the sum of Eleven Hundred Three Dollars and Sixty-Two Cents ($1,103.62), plus costs, on the basis that the County Employee has filed a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Approved - 5/0 Moved from 16K2 J. Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the Easement Acquisition of Parcel 101 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. Roberto Bollt, Successor Trustee, under Land Trust Agreement Dated 1/2 7/86, et al, Case No. 00-2433-CA (Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road Intersection) Project #60171 .)Award Work Order #PBS-02-06 in the amount of $190,161 to Professional Building Systems for the renovation of Immokalee Airport Park. Approved - 4/1(Commissioner Halas opposed) Moved from 16D4 K. Award Work Order #PBS-02-06 in the amount of $190,161 to Professional Building Systems for the renovation of Immokalee Airport Park. Approved - 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle out) 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Ae This item has a Time Certain of 12:00 noon. Closed Attorney-Client Session pursuant to Section 286.011 (8), Fla. Stat., to discuss Settlement Negotiations/Litigation Expenses in Aquaport v. Collier County, Case No. 7 November 19, 2002 2:01-CV-341-FTM-29DNF, now pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. 13. 14. Be For the Board of County Commissioners to provide direction to outside Counsel, Ted Tripp, Esq., and the Office of the County Attorney as to Settlement Negotiations/Litigation Expenses in Aquaport v. Collier County, Case No. 2:01-CV-341-FTM-29DNF, now pending in the United States District Court of the Middle District of Florida. $500,000 settlement from Insurance Proceeds and up to $100,000 of additional monies from General Fund - Approved 4/1 (Commissioner Coyle opposed) Ce Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners ratify and authorize the retention of Ted Tripp, Esq., and the Law Firm of Garvin and Tripp to represent Collier County in the Bert Harris Act Claim filed by Aquaport Plaintiffs. Approved - 5/0 OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS A. Dwight Brock, Collier County Clerk of Courts, RE: Ordinance 99-22, requiring lobbyists to register - Discussed AIRPORT AUTHORITY 15. STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS Ce Status report regarding potential expense on mosquito control boundaries. (John Dunnuck, Administrator, Public Services) Recommendation that the mosquito control district poll the residents re expansion and costs-4/1 (Coyle opposed) Commissioner Halas nominated as representative to the Economic Development Committee Staff to work on past ordinances regarding how to conduct meetings in the future Domestic Animal Services named as top agency in Florida by the Florida Animal Control Agency 8 November 19, 2002 16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately Approved and/or adopted with changes - 5/0 A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of"Naples Gateway, Phase I". Resolution 2002-466 2) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Catamaran Court at Tarpon Cove". Resolution 2002-467 3) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Tarpon Cove". Resolution 2002-468 4) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Pelican Marsh Unit Twenty- Two". Resolution 2002-469 5) 6) Request to approve for recording the final plat of"Hemingway Place" and approval of the Standard Form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. With stipulations Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Pine Air Lakes Unit One". Resolution 2002-470 7) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of"Stonebridge Unit Three". 9 November 19, 2002 Resolution 2002-471 8) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Huntington Lakes Unit Two". Resolution 2002-472 9) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Huntington Lakes Unit Three". Resolution 2002-473 10) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Huntington Lakes Unit Four". Resolution 2002-474 11) Petition CARNY-2002-AR-3335, Pastor Ettore Rubin, C.S., Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, requesting permit to conduct a carnival from November 27 through December 1, 2002, on Church property located at 207 South 9th Street, Immokalee. Carnival Permit-2002-10 12) Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2002-003 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Lloyd L. Bowein regarding violation of Sections 2.7.6.5, as amended of the Collier County Land Development Code. 13) Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2002-065 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Leonardo Portal regarding violation of Ordinance No. 91-102 as amended, Sections 2.7.6.1 and 1.5.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 14) Recommendation to approve Commercial Excavation Permit No. 59.835/AR-3135 "Livingston Lakes Commercial Excavation", located in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East; bounded on the North by vacant agriculture zoning and stiles PUD, on the West by Livingston Road right-of-way, on the East by Donovan Center PUD, 10 November 19, 2002 Be and on the South vacant agriculture zoning. With stipulations TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 1) Approve a Budget Amendment to combine funds in the Radio Road Beautification MSTU into one Project Number 60081 in the amount of $155,800. 2) Approve a Budget Amendment to transfer funds from the Golden Gate Parkway Landscape Maintenance Account into the CR951 Phase A and B Landscape Maintenance Account. 3) Request that the Board of County Commissioners approve a donation agreement and accept a drainage easement from the Sabal Lake Subdivision Homeowners Association, Inc., for a parcel of land containing 0.07 acres for the purpose of providing additional drainage within the community which will allow the County legal access as required for all common drainage facilities within the common area of this development. 4) Approve a Budget Amendment to recognize unanticipated revenue in the amount of $1,400,000 for the proposed Immokalee Road/I-75 Interchange Project for the improvements related to the Tarpon Bay Boulevard/Northbrooke Drive Intersection Improvements, Project No. 66042A. Approve Resolutions to establish "No Parking" Zones along the County road rights-of-way of Industrial Boulevard and Corporate Square Boulevard at a cost of approximately $2600. Resolutions 2002-475 re Industrial Blvd. and 2002-476 re Corporate Blvd. 6) Approve an Interagency Agreement between Collier County and the State of Florida Department of Corrections, Hendry Correctional Institution, for continued use of inmate labor in road maintenance activities. 11 November19,2002 7) Request the Board to adopt a Resolution authorizing Transportation Division Administrator and Transportation Maintenance Director to sign the Certification of Disbursements for the FDOT Asset Management Maintenance Agreement, Contract Number BD-418, Financial Project Number 412918-72-01. Resolution 2002-477 8) Approve Work Order No. BRC-FT-02-04 with Better Roads Inc., for median improvements in the amount of $128,317.75 on Pine Ridge Road, Project No. 60016, and adopt a Resolution reducing the speed limit on Pine Ridge Road from forty-five miles per hour (45 MPH) to forty miles per hour (40 MPH) in the vicinity of Naples Boulevard Intersection. Resolution 2002-478 Ce 9) Approve Budget Amendments to carry forward funds in several projects to re-open purchase orders in FY03 that were closed by mistake in FY02 in the amount of $100,996.70. PUBLIC UTILITIES De 1) Approve Budget Amendment to cancel the Marco Island Breakwater Modifications Project and return to the Tourist Tax Reserves $699,500. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Approve a Budget Amendment for the increase in Medicaid Waiver Revenue and Program Costs in the amount of $16,930. 2) Approve a Lease Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation for Collier Boulevard Boating Park. 3) Approve a Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program Grant Agreement for up to $120,000 for improvements at Bayview Park. Moved to Item 10K 4) Award Work Order #PBS-02-06 in the amount of $190,161 to Professional Building Systems for the renovation of Immokalee 12 November 19, 2002 Ee Airport Park. 5) Authorize temporary closure of 1 lth Street in Immokalee for safe access into the Farm City Barbeque to be held November 27, 2002. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1) Award Contracts//02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services" (Estimated Annual Amount $275,000). Awarded to five firms as contained in the executive summary 2) Approve Change Order No. One, Work Order BSSW-02-01, in the amount of $10,275.00, with Barany, Schmitt, Summers, Weaver and Partners, Inc. for design services for construction of EMS//19. 3) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve and ratify a Settlement Agreement resolving the Lawsuit styled Collier County vs. Chesley McDonald, Case No. 02-1520-CC, County Court, Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida. 4) Approval of a Contract between Collier County and Community Health Parmers Inc., for managed care services for the County's Group Health and Workers' Compensation Program. s) Approve an Amendment to Agreement for the conveyance of GAC Trust Reserved Lands to the District School Board of Collier County, Florida, for future construction of an elementary school in Golden Gate Estates, not to exceed ten dollars ($10.00). Withdrawn 6) Approval of elimination of the Sick Leave Bank Program and an increase in the Short Term Disability Benefit Program. F. COUNTY MANAGER 1) Award hurricane shelter upgrade and retrofit Contract #02-3429 to Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc., for the roof retrofit and shutter upgrade of the Laurel Oak and Vineyards Elementary Schools in the amount of $48,750. This project is 100% reimbursed from the State. 13 November 19, 2002 Ge 2) Selection of Underwriters (RFP 02-3435) in anticipation of financing future infrastructure improvements in Collier County. As detailed in the executive summary AIRPORT AUTHORITY H. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE J® 1) Miscellaneous Items to File for Record as Directed. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 1) Recommendation to adopt the Budget Amendment appropriating Carry Forward and Expenditure Budgets for open purchase orders at the end of Fiscal Year 2002. 2) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve Carry Forward Funding for the Sheriff's Office. 3) That the Board of County Commissioners make a determination of whether the purchases of goods and services documented in the detailed report of Open Purchase Orders serve a valid public purpose and authorize the expenditure of County funds to satisfy said purchases. A copy of the Goods and Services Document is on display in the County Manager's Office, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, W. Harmon Turner Building, Naples, FL. K. COUNTY ATTORNEY Moved to Item i) 10I Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners adopt and ratify the termination of a Lawsuit against a Collier County Employee, which sought reimbursement of a debt owed to the County by the Employee in the sum of Eleven Hundred Three Dollars and Sixty-Two Cents ($1,103.62), plus costs, on the basis that the County Employee has filed a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Moved to Item 10J 14 November 19, 2002 2) Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the Easement Acquisition of Parcel 101 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. Roberto Bollt, Successor Trustee, under Land Trust Agreement Dated 1/2 7/86, et al, Case No. 00-2433-CA (Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road Intersection) Project #60171. 3) Acceptance of payment of previously unpaid Education, Community and Regional Parks and Library Impact Fees for Bentley Village and Education Impact Fees for Encore Senior Living and approval of refunds due to facilities. 4) Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the Easement Acquisition of Parcel 132 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. James R. Colosimo, Trustee under Unrecorded Land Trust Agreement dated 12/10/92, et al, Case No. 00-0138-CA (Pine Ridge Road Project #60111). Staff to deposit the sum of $37,344.46 into the Registry of the court. 5) Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the Fee Simple Acquisition of Parcel 171 in the Lawsuit Styled Collier County v. Ismael Gonzales, et al, Case No. 02-2159-CA (Immokalee Road Project//60018) Staff to deposit the sum of $1,400.00 into the Registry of the court. 17. SUMMARY AGENDA - THIS SECTION IS FOR ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1) A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2) UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OR OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OF ALL MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3) NO WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE ITEM RECEIVED BY STAFF, THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE BCC MEETING ON WHICH THE ITEMS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD; AND 4) NO INDIVIDUALS ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE ITEM. SHOULD ANY OF THE FOLLOWING 15 November 19, 2002 ITEMS BE MOVED TO THE REGULAR AGENDA ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST BE SWORN IN. Moved to Item #SD A. Petition PUDA-2002-AR-2566, Robert Mulhere of RWA, Inc., representing J.E.D. of Southwest Florida, Inc., and Colony Corporate Center, Inc., requesting an amendment to the "Pelican Marsh" Planned Unit Development (PUD), for the purpose of increasing the allocation of Medical Office Space allowed from 9,000 square feet to 26,000 square feet within the approved overall general office leaseable floor area of 295,800 square feet for property located North of Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 901) and East of Livingston Road, in Sections 25, 27, 34, 35 and 36, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, and Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion item to DOA-2002-AR-2567 Moved to Item #8E B. Petition DOA-2002-AR-2567, Robert Mulhere of RWA, Inc., representing J.E.D. of Southwest Florida, Inc., and Colony Corporate Center, Inc., requesting an amendment to the "Pelican Marsh" Development of Regional Impact (DRI) for the purpose of increasing the allocation of Medical Office Space allowed from 9,000 square feet to 26,000 square feet within the approved overall general office leaseable floor area of 295,800 square feet and to correct a Scrivener's Error contained within the Development Order for property located North of Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 901) and East of Livingston Road, in Sections 25, 27, 34, 35 and 36, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, and Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion item to PUDA-2002-AR-2566. Moved to Item #8F C. Request that the Board of County Commissioners adopt an Ordinance amending Collier County Ordinance No. 2001-76, as amended, which created the Livingston Road Phase II Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit; providing for amendment to Section Six to increase the number of members who serve on the Advisory Committee from five to nine; providing for amendment to Section Six to limit membership on the Advisory Committee to three members from each subdivision or community; providing for inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances; providing for conflict and severability; and providing for an effective date 16 November 19, 2002 Dm' Request the Board adopt an Ordinance amending Collier County Ordinance No. 96-84 which created the Radio Road Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit; providing for amendment to Section Three to expand the purpose to include the cost for curbing, watering facilities, plantings and maintenance of the median areas of any public roadway adjoining Radio Road within the boundaries of the unit; providing for inclusion in the Code of Laws. Ordinance 2002-59 Ee This item to be continued to the December 3, 2002 BCC Meeting. VA- 2002-AR-2908, Craig J. Pajer, P.E., of AEC National, requesting a 40-foot height variance from the required 35 feet to 75 feet in the Public Use District for the addition to the Naples Jail Center located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Building "W", Collier County Government Center, in Section 12, Township 50 South, Range 25 East. Companion petition to CU-02-AR- 2759 and VA-02-AR-2909. Fe Ge This item to be continued to the December 3~ 2002 BCC Meeting. VA- 2002-AR-2909, Craig J. Pajer, P.E., of AEC National, representing Collier County Board of County Commissioners, requesting a variance from the maximum height of 35 feet to 110 feet for a parking garage at the Naples Jail Center. This variance is required for the 5-story construction and future expansion to eight stories of a parking garage. This request of 110 feet is 75 feet greater than that allowed in the Public Use District at this location. Companion petition to CU-2002-AR-2759 and VA-2002-AR-2908. This item to be continued to the December 3, 2002 BCC Meeting. CU- 2002-AR-2759, Craig J. Pajer, P.E., of AEC National, Inc., representing Collier County Board of County Commissioners, requesting Conditional Use 3 of the "P" Public Use zoning district to allow for the expansion of an existing jail facility for property located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, in Section 12, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion petition to VA-02-AR-2908 and VA-02-AR-2909. 18. ADJOURN. INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 774-8383. 17 November 19, 2002 AGENDA CHANGES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETING November 19, 2002 DELETE ITEM 10(D): Review Tourist Develo'pment related advertising and promotion invoices, determine expenditures serve a public purpose, approve appropriate invoices for payment in the amount of $14,850.47 from Fund 194 Reserves, and deny payment of invoice in the amount of $3,857.00, as recommended by the Tourist Development Council. (Staff request.) ADD ITEM #10(H): Approve budget amendment and dredging contract for Wiggins Pass Emergency Maintenance Dredging, in the total amount of $340,000. (Staff request.) MOVE ITEM 16(D)4 TO 10(K): Award Work Order #PBS-02-06 in the amount of $190,161 to Professional Building Systems for the renovation of Immokalee Airport Park. (Commissioner Fiala request) CONTINUE ITEM 16(E)6 TO DECEMBER 3, 2002 BCC MEETING: Approval of elimination of the Sick Leave Bank Program and an increase in the Short Term Disability Benefit Program. (Commissioner Coletta request.) MOVE ITEM 16(K)1 TO 10(I): Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners adopt and ratify the termination of a Lawsuit against a Collier County Employee, which sought reimbursement of a debt owed to the County by the Employee in the sum of $1,103.62, plus costs, on the basis that the County Employee has filed a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. (Commissioner Coyle request.) MOVE ITEM 16(K)2 TO 10(J): Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the Easement Acquisition of Parcel 101 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. Roberto Bo#t, Successor Trustee, under Land Trust Agreement Dated 1/27/86, et al, Case No. 00-2433-CA (Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road Intersection), Project #60171. (Commissioner Coyle and Commissioner Fiala request.) MOVE ITEM 17(A) TO 8(D): Petition PUDA-2002-AR-2566, Robert Mulhere of RWA, Inc., representing J.E.D. of Southwest Florida, Inc., and Colony Corporate Center, Inc., requesting an amendment to the "Pelican Marsh" Planned Unit Development (PUD), for the purpose of increasing the allocation of Medical Office Space allowed from 9,000 square feet to 26,000 square feet within the approved overall general office leaseable floor area of 295,800 square feet for property located North of Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 901) and East of Livingston Road, in Sections 25, 27, 34, 35 and 36, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, and Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion item to DOA-2002-AR-2567. (Commissioner Halas request.) MOVE ITEM 17(B) TO 8(E): Petition DOA-2002-AR-2567, Robert Mulhere of RWA, Inc., representing J.E.D. of Southwest Florida, Inc., and Colony Corporate Center, Inc., requesting an amendment to the "Pelican Marsh" Development of Regional Impact (DRI) for the purpose of increasing the allocation of Medical Office Space allowed from 9,000 square feet to 26,000 square feet within the approved overall general office leaseable floor area of 295,800 square feet and to correct a Scrivener's Error contained within the Development Order for property located North of Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 901) and East of Livingston Road, in Sections 25, 27, 34, 35 and 36, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, and Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion item to PUDA-2002-AR-2566. (Commissioner Fiala request.) **NOTE TO BE READ INTO THE RECORD: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 99-22 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. Item 16(A)7: Due to printing errors, some agenda packets may not contain Item 18 (A) 7, titled: Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the Final Plat of "Stonebridge Unit Three". Every effort has been made to distribute copies of this item. The document is part of the agenda package and available for viewing in the agenda book outside the Boardroom. Item 16(B)8: Signed copies of Resolution have been distributed to the Board of County Commissioners and the Clerk of Courts, and are available to the public. 16(E)5: Copies of the Amendment to Agreement and Corrective Statutory Deed are available for the public. WHEREAS, PROCLAMATT. ON I 4 A November 24-30 is Notional Form-City Week, a time set aside to recognize and honor the contributions of our country's agriculturalists and to strengthen the bond between urban and rural citizens; and, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, in Collier County the highpoint of Farm-City Week is the annual Form-City Barbecue, sponsored by Collier County's University Extension Service and a committee of volunteers; and, agriculture is an important element in Collier County's economic machine, with total economic activity of over $300 million annually; and, 2~% of Collier County is utilized for' agriculture, providing vital ecological benefits, including habitat for wildlife and recharge area for our aquifer; and, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, NOW THERI COUNTY County, the Board supports local agricult~ with the Unive s Exte~ ,I our at ARI~ the all of desi~ contributions our food bONE AND ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMT55TONERS aU LO PROCLAtAA TION WHEREAS, the global epidemic of HXV infect/on and AfD$ requires a worldwide effort to increase communication, education and united act/on to stop the spread of HXV/AID$; and, WHEREAS, the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (L/NAID$) observes December 1 of each year as World AIDS Day, a day to expand and strengthen worldwide efforts to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS; and, UNAIDS est/mates that over 37 re#lion adults and $ mil/ion children are currently living with HXV/AIDS, w/th your9 people under the age of 25 accounting for more than half of ali new infections; and, the American Association for World Health is encouragin9 a better understanding of the challenge of HXV/AXDS national/), as it that the number of people diagnosed with HIV and AIDS in the L/n/ted States continues to increase, wHh 900,000 people in the L/.S. now infected; and, WHEREAS, Coil/er County (as of July 31, ~00~9: intert~ti~l attention national and to disseminate wtth H~V or AIOS,... the World Stigma.and DiscriminatiOn, .. is.: Os socia ted with dlocr/minat/on, aa individuals ~t~fected w/th ~V ~h~ie.~am///es,~ their loved on~ and ~he/r or.campion, solidor(~, a~ support, ~heie ~ami#~. and communHies. living & AIDS stigma and rejected by ocross responses in people, NOW THERE?OR~, County, of Collier on December l, ~00~; and urge all citizens to take part in act/v/t/es and observances designed to increase awareness and understanding of HIV/AIDS as global challenge, to take part in HIV/AIDS prevent/on activities and programs, and to join the 91obal effort to prevent the further spread of HXV/AIDS. DONE AND ORDERED TI4~S l gth Day of November, ~00~. BOARD COL/NTY ?L E. BROCK, CLERK United Arts Council of Collier County "Cultural Collier" October, 2002 United Arts Council of Collier County "Cultural Collier" October, 2002 "Cultural Collier" A vision for the development of arts, culture, and heritage in Collier County, Florida The results of a countywide assessment and planning process commissioned by the United Arts Council of Collier County October 2002 Cultural Plan Steering Committee Funders United Arts Council Staff Chair: George Lange, Umted Arts Council Board qf Directors Newt Barrett, Gulfshore Media Dr. Ron Bowman, International College Dr. Jack Crocker, Florida Gulf Coast University Maury Dailey, Marco Island Film Festival Frank Dieffenwierth, NAACP qf Collier County Donna Fiala, Collier County Board of Commissioners Mary George, Community Foundation qf Collier County Anne Goodnight, Collier County Public Schools Board of Education Barbara Hill, von Liebig Art Center Joy Lelonek, United Arts Council Terry McMahan, International College Susan Mainwaring, Classic Chamber Concerts Fred Nold, Nold Gallery Bill O'Neill, United Arts Council Board of Directors Kathy Prutos, Tourism Alliance of Collier County David Rice, Community Foundation of Collier County John Sorey, Naples Players Jerry Thirion, Collier County Tourist Development Council Donna Ridewood, Collier County Museums Dolph von Arx, Florida Arts Council Community Foundation of Collier County Collier County Government Mary Elizabeth Ewing Foundation Northern Trust Bank of Florida NA State Street Foundation United Arts Council of Collier County Joy Lelonek, Executive Director Consultants AMS Pla]ming & Research Arthur Greenberg, Director (314) 727-2880 Web: AMS-Online.corn Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................... ] BACKGROUND WHY THE CULTURAL ASSESSMENT WAS CONDUCTED ................................. 1 \¥HAT DOES THE UNITED ARTS (.( UNCt]. OF COt,I,FF.R COUNTY DO? ........................... 1 METHODOLOGY HOW THE CULTURAL ASSESSMENT WAS CONDUCTED ................................ 4 HOW CULTURE IMPACTS OUR COMMUNITY WHAT WE LEARNED FROM ORGANIZATIONS, ARTISTS, AND CITIZENS OF COLLIER COUNTY ................................................................. 5 OUR COMMUNITY IN CONTEXT WHAT WE LEARNED FROM OTHER LOCAL ARTS AGENCIES ....................... 9 WI1A'i [8 A LOCAL ARTS AGENCY (LAA)? .................................................................. 9 MODEl, CASE STUDIES .............................................................................................. 11 "UNIFYING PRINCIPLES" THE OVERALL THEMES THAT PROVIDE A FOUNDATION FOR THE PLAN ]3 WllAT IS A CI_ILTURAL PLAN'? ................................................................................... 13 THE. PI.AN AS "STRUCTUR^I," SOl ,UTION .................................................................. 13 T._tS.,.~.;?...U_.N._n..!Z~..P..._~....c~LL..:E..s.. ...................................................................................... 14 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES A "CULTURAL VISION" FOR COLLIER COUNTY .............................................. IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND BENEFITS OF IMPLEMENTING THE CULTURAL PLAN ....................................................... 26 THE ARTS COMMUNITY ANECDOTES AND EVIDENCE OF HOW THE ARTS INFUSE OUR LIVES ..... Executive Summary Introduction The United Arts Council of Collier County is designated by the State of Florida as the county's official local arts agency. It is an umbrella organization for the arts in the county: approximately 40 organizations, including museums and educational institutions, fall under the UAC umbrella. The council provides a number of services and benefits including publishing a quarterly newsletter (Arts Alive), a monthly networking session for arts groups and artists, the mmual Dig the Arts festival, specialized arts education programs, and provides grant funds to the region's nonprofit groups, artists, teachers and students. The UAC accomplishes these programs through parmerships and collaborations with government agencies, other nonprofits, foundations, educational institutions, and human service agencies, with a full-time staff of one, four part-time staff members, and an annual budget of $287,000. A Cultural Assessment Plan Methodology The UAC commissioned a Cultural Assessment in fall 2001 to objectively assess the state of the arts in Collier County and support the Council's efforts toward cultural development. It was intended that the Assessment process would stimulate greater govermnental and public awareness and appreciation of the importm~ce of the arts to the people of Collier County, among other outcomes. The pimming process was coordinated by an independent consulting firm, AMS Planning & Research, working closely with staff of the United Arts Council. Ongoing guidance was provided by a volunteer Steering Committee representing a cross-section of cormnunity leadership. A series of research tasks included interviews with community leadership, written surveys of arts and cultural organizations and individual artists, an "intercept" survey of Collier County residents, a comparable analysis of arts councils in other Florida communities and in other similarly-sized markets nationally, an analysis of arts and cultural audiences and visitors (through geo-demographic lifestyle coding of arts group patron lists), town meetings and focus groups held throughout the county. Following the research steps the Steering Conmfittee held a series of plamfing meetings to review research findings and establish the "cultural vision" for Collier County. It can be summarized, therefore, that this Cultural Plan is the result of input received from almost 600 individuals who participated in surveys and meetings. AMS Planning & Research Page i October 2002 Research Organizational Survcv "Cultural Collier"-A Cultural Assessment & Plan Twenty cultural organizations responding to the survey account for ahnost 700 performances and 100 exhibits and festivals annually, serving just under one million visitors and audiences each year. Another 20,000 attend 700 classes and educational programs, in addition to outreach programs that provide almost 75,000 cultural experiences annually for students in Collier County. The nonprofit arts organizations alone provide full-time employment for almost 200. Annual impact on the region's economy, based on government and industry benchmarks, is in the range of $125-$175 million annually, including some 4,000-5,000 additional "jobs created" (through secondary spending). Well in excess of 100,000 volunteer hours are contributed each year. File Analysis Intercept Survey Six cultural groups submitted a total of 9,000 household addresses for analysis. The market area is fairly well centered on Naples though it does extend into Lee County, especially the Bonita Springs area. A diverse public is being served by these cultural groups, including traditional arts attenders (often empty nester or parents of teens), an "All-American family" segment, younger "non-family" households, and a substantial base among the senior population. Surveys conducted with members of the public revealed that more than three- quarters of survey respondents attended at least one performing arts event and at least one visual art exhibition in Collier County during the past year. The Philharmonic Center for the Arts was the venue attended most recently for any type of cultural event; lack of time and the cost of attending were the most often cited reasons for not attending more frequently. Theater, musical theater, popular and classical music, and festivals are the most preferred types of cultural programs. Seasonal residents showed a relatively high interest in lectures and historical programs (about 32% interested compared to only 21% of year-round residents). Sampler ticket packages, dimmer/theater packages, Web sites and visitor itineraries rated high among most respondent groups. More than 77% of respondents (with no difference by seasonal/year- round) believe local and county governments should provide funding for arts and culture. Model Case Studies Interviews were conducted with a "peer group" of 8 nonprofit/special district arts councils in Florida and in Santa Cruz (CA), Harry County (SC), Scottsdale (AZ), and Asheville (NC). Five of these councils serve markets in the 200-300,000 AMS Planning & Research October 2002 Page ii "Cultural Collier"-A Cultural Assessment & Plan range, comparable xvith UAC's service area population of 259,000. The following table summarizes the quantitative results of this research: Unifying Principles Goals & Objectives Goal A Total Budget $938,857 $287,000 Local Government $125,143 $0 Funding County Government $331,643 $0 Funding $55,000 $30,000 State Government Funding Total Public Funding $511,786 $2.44 Per Capita Funding Public Funding Per Capita $30,000 $1.11 $1.00 0.12¢ Two themes serve as central principles for the rest of the Plan's substance, and can be sununarized as follows: Enhance and expand access to arts, cultural, and heritage resources by the region's residents and visitors >' Provide resources to ensure a healthy, sustainable community of cultural organizations and artists It is through these two prisms the rest of the county's "Cultural Vision" should be understood. Moreover, it should be noted that throughout this document, "culture" is defined in the broadest sense of the term, intended to encompass fine arts, heritage, folk traditions, and other expressions. This goal, to "involve more of the public, more often, in cultural activities," is intended to improve access to arts and cultural opportunities by better promoting the county's cultural resources and Collier County as a cultural destination. Specific objectives include collaborative marketing and audience development approaches, establishing cultural tourism progrmns and packages, providing AMS' Planning & Research October 2002 Page iii "Cultural Collier" - A Cultural Assessment & Plan special attendance incentives for students and educators, encouraging countDvidc programming and use of nontraditional venues. Goal B This goal calls for offering "arts education for the citizenry, from preschoolers through elder-hostelers." It is premised on increasing participation in arts and culture by the young people of Collier County and strengthening community-based arts education by positioning the arts as a fun, social, and educational leisure experience. Objectives include a public advocacy campaign, audience development initiatives targeting students, "familiarity" events and materials to link the region's arts and cultural program providers with schools, expansion of student/public interface opportunities, creating new adult and community education programs, and making facilities available for these activities. Goal C Goal D Goal E This goal, to "provide support services to cultural organizations and individual artists," is a foundation of this and many other cultural plans, based on the belief that arts groups and artists benefit from professional development opportunities in marketing, fundraising, audience development, organizational management, and so forth. Individual artists can also be assisted through promotion of "goods and services" to consumers and local businesses. Objectives include nurturing partnerships among arts, cultural, al~d heritage organizations, and between the cultural sector and other organizations and agencies, expanding the base of volunteer support, technical assistance and marketing programs for individual artists, and professional development services for the region's cultural organizations. Goal D calls for "encouraging the creation, renovation, and adaptation of facilities for cultural activities throughout the county." Objectives include working with appropriate pampers to support the development of additional theater spaces, nonprofit exhibit venues, additional classroolns, support space (e.g., rehearsal, production, etc.), artist work/exhibit space, and, in particular, a cultural center and history museum on Marco Island. Quite simply, this goal recognizes the need to "advocate for Collier County's cultural vision." Its single objective (the plan's top priority) calls for a coordinated advocacy campaign involving work with elected officials to educate them about the impact of the arts. AMS Planning & Research October 2002 Page iv Goal F Goal G Goal H Implementation Ove/~ll Benefits "Cultural Collier"-A Cultural Assessment & Plan "Securing new sources of private and public funding to achieve the cultural vision" is the text of Goal F. The county's cultural supporters hope that strategic partnerships and more cohesive teamwork can have a significant and innnediate effect on furthering the County's overall economic and community development. Objectives call for working with city and county officials to identify and secure new, dedicated public funding sources for re-granting, operations, marketing/awareness campaigns, and other identified cultural plan needs. This goal proposes to "work to incorporate art in public places." Establishment of a dedicated art in public places program might involve murals, sculpture, and artist-designed public infrastructure projects (including such items as sewer covers, benches, and light poles) and could involve incorporating artists on planning and architectural teams. Objectives call for the United Arts Council to work with appropriate partners (e.g., Collier County, City of Naples, City of Marco Island, etc.)., including existing public art committees, to advocate for preparation of a formal Art in Public Places Ordinance and Plan. Finally, this goal intends to "strengthen and expand the United Arts Council" as a cornerstone in efforts to implement this Plan and advance the cultural sector in Collier County. The United Arts Council operates a full complement of programs on a budget about one-third that of its "peer" group of agencies, and with virtually no public dollars. Believing that the UAC provides a critical leadership role in implementing this Plan, objectives call for additional human and financial resources and other "advancement" strategies. Implementing Collier County's cultural plan is envisioned to result in the following overall benefits: Local groups will operate more effectively through individual effort and mutual cooperation. · Public interest, awareness, education and participation in cultural activities will increase. · There will be a positive economic hnpact as more cultural dollars are kept at home in Collier County, as more dollars relating to culture are generated, and as more people are attracted to the area as a result of its high quality of life. ASI, S' Planning & Research October 2002 Page v "Cultural Collier" - A Cultural Assesxment & Plan Cultural issues will become an integral part of governmental policy and partnerships: its legitimacy and importance will be assumed on the part of local governments. Strategies For most goals, the United Arts Council will coordinate a coalition of advocates and partners such as individual cultural institutions and artists, local and regional tourism promoters, chambers of commerce, educators, private businesses and foundations, and volunteers. Funding will be sought from private foundations (for "shared" marketing initiatives), from new or existing public dollars, from expanded fundraising efforts. The Community Foundation of Collier County and the region's institutions of higher learning (who have been integrally involved in this plan's creation) are anticipated to play a crucial role in advancing this plan by generating interest and conunitting resources. Most often funding will require a public/private combination and innovative incentives (e.g., tax credits, low-interest loans) for certain capital projects. Acknowledgements The consultants would like to thank the United Arts Council staff, board of directors, m~d Cultural Assessment Steering Committee for their gracious stewardship of this planning effort. In particular, George Lange (Committee Chairman), Bill O'Neill (UAC Board President), and Joy Leionek shepherded this assessment with a steadfast intent to create a cultural plan of which the community would be proud. AMS Planning & Research Page vi October 2002 Background Why the Cultural Assessment Was Conducted Florida's Collier County encompasses the City of Naples, Marco Island, Everglades City, the town of Immokalee, residential neighborhoods principally in the western portion of unincorporated Collier County stretching north to Bonita Springs, and hundreds of square miles of agricultural lands. The County is one of the nation's fastest growing, driven in large part by the influx of wealthy retirees to the Gulf Coast and the new employment offered by the related service industries. Residents of the County describe the evolution of a "world class" community over the past two decades, evidenced by numerous art galleries, first-class restaurants, and, not the least, the emergence of cultural institutions such as the Philharmonic Center for the Arts and the yon Liebig Art Center. Along with the rise of cultural groups came the establishment, in 1984, of the United Arts Council of Collier County (preceded by the Fine Arts Society of Collier County, established in the 1970s), designated by the State of Florida as the County's official local arts agency. The Council's official mission is as follows: "To enrich lives and strengthen our community through the power of the arts." Using advocacy, education, encouragement and coordination, the United Arts Council of Collier County focuses attention on the importance of all the arts to our economy and quality ofl!tre. We serve as an umbrella organization for the county, establishing partnerships with educational, political, business and social leaders, artists and art organizations, families, citizens and visitors. We grant funds, provide technical and managerial support, produce publications, and collaborate with others to address the needs of our members and our community. What does the United Arts Council of Collier County do? The programs of the United Arts Council of Collier County strive to meet the needs of a fast-growing, increasingly sophisticated cormnunity. It is m~ umbrella organization for the arts in the county, dedicated to bringing the arts to everyone. Approximately 40 organizations, including museums and educational institutions, fall under the UAC umbrella. Individual artists, students, teachers, and nonprofit organizations can apply for project grants awarded once yearly. Mentorship AMS Planning & Research Page 1 October 2002 "Cultural Collier" -,d Cultural Assessment & Plan opportunities and school residencies are also available. Major programs and activities include: Public Information - The United Arts Council serves as an arts information clearinghouse. It publishes a quarterly newsletter, Arts Alive, informing the public about the arts in Collier County, which contains an extensive calendar of events that is made widely available to the public (20,000 copies mmually), and maintains a Web site. The Council works with organizations such as the Naples Area Chamber of Commerce Visitors Center, Collier County libraries, area hotels, and community volunteers in implementing these programs. · Arts Forum - Members of the Arts Forum meet monthly in season to share information and hear speakers on topics of mutual interest. Community Arts Fund - Grants are awarded yearly to artists, nonprofit organizations, educators and students to support innovative arts projects in the community. Very Special Arts - Very Special Arts programs are geared to providing art experiences for children at risk and for developmentally and physically challenged children and adults. This UAC program involves a range of partners such as the Naples Woman's Club, the statewide VSA Florida, Collier County Public Schools, Immokalee Child Care Center, the Guadelupe Center, Redlands Christian Migrant Center, and Immokalee High School Beta Club. Immokalee Ceramics Studio - A ceramics cottage industry, created to become an economic generator and a force for conununity revitalization in an area ripe for artistic growth. This model progrmn is one of the UAC's most "integrated" efforts as it calls upon the resources of numerous nonprofit and govenunental entities (e.g., Empowerment Alliance of Southwest Florida, Florida Gulf Coast University, Youth Work Initiative, Collier County Public Schools, New Beginnings-Imrnokalee, PACE Center for Girls, Redlands Christian Migrant Association, League Club of Collier County, hnmokalee Foundatiom Colnmunity Foundation of Collier County, Scripps Howard Foundation, National Endowment for the Arts, and Florida Depamnent of State's Division of Cultural Affairs). Artist Registries - Databases, listings and files of infommtion concerning artists in all disciplines are open to the public at the United Arts Council offices. Dig the Arts Festival - An mmual event, partnering with the City of Naples, sponsored by the UAC, featuring sand castle art contests and children's programs on Naples beaches~ attended by more than 6~000 people each year. AMS Planning & Research Page 2 October 2002 "Cultural Collier "-,4 Cultural,4ssessment & Plan A Cultural Assessment Arts in Education - Arts in education programs supplement existing public and private arts learning for county students. Among education programs is the nationally-recognized Project Kaleidoscope, a consortium of schools and agencies in Collier County, one of which is the United Arts Council (involving other partners such as the United States Department of Education, Collier County Public Schools, and the Community Foundation of Collier County). Now in its third year, the program provides after-school academic and enrictunent programs for elementary school students, and parenting skills and technology skill development for community residents. Other programs and partnerships, such as the Care Club Choir (involving local high school students from the Gulf Coast High Photography Department, the Care Club Center of Naples, and VSA Florida) feature arts council staff helping Alzheimer's patients to recover lost memories through song. The UAC accomplishes these programs with a full-time staff of one, four part- time contracted staff, and an atmual budget of $287,000 (the vast majority of which is grant funding restricted to specific programs). The UAC commissioned a Cultural Assessment in fall 2001. The intent of the Assessment was to objectively assess the state of the arts in Collier County and to support the efforts of the UAC by: · Stimulating greater governmental and public awareness and appreciation of the importance of the arts to the people of Collier County · Encouraging and facilitating greater and more efficient use of governmental and private resources for the development and support of the arts · Encouraging mid facilitating opportunities for residents and nonresidents to participate in artistic activities · Promoting the development of Florida artists, arts institutions, and cormnunity organizations sponsoring arts activities and audiences · Supporting and facilitating the preservation and growth of the county's artistic resources. · Stimulating greater govenm~ental and public awareness and appreciation of the importance of the arts to the people of Collier County AMS Planning & Research Page 3 October 2002 Methodology How the Cultural Assessment Was Conducted After a competitive selection process, AMS Planning & Research was retained to coordinate the assessment process. The planning process was coordinated by the United Arts Council; ongoing guidance was provided by a volunteer Steering Committee recruited by the UAC to represent a cross-section of conm~unity leadership. A series of research tasks was employed to solicit input from arts and cultural organizations, individual artists, community leadership (representing government, education, business, human services, and other key sectors), members of the general public, and certain targeted constituencies. The specific research tasks conducted for the Cultural Assessment included: · Interviews with conununity leaders representing local and county governments, schools, universities, human service providers, businesses, the tourism industry, and other at-large residents of the County (56 interviews) · Written surveys of arts and cultural organizations located in Collier County (22 organizations responding) and a survey of individual artists residing in Collier County (35 responses) · An "intercept" survey of Collier County residents, administered at public locations (e.g., grocery stores, festivals, community centers) throughout the County (including a Spanish-language version conducted in Inunokalee) (354 total responses) · A comparable analysis of arts councils in other Florida conm~unities and in other similarly-sized markets nationally (8 agencies studied) · An analysis of arts and cultural audiences and visitors using demographic and lifestyle segmentation data (almost 9, 000 househoM addresses included. submitted by six cultural organizations) · Town meetings and focus groups conducted in distinct areas of Naples, Marco Island, and Inm~okalee (attended by almost 100 people) The Steering Committee held a series of plmming meetings to review research findings and establish the "cultural vision" for Collier County. This Cultural Plan is the result of input received from almost 600 people who participated in surveys and meetings. A~,l,S' Planning & Research October 2002 Pa,ge 4 How Culture Impacts Our Community What We Learned from Organizations, Artists, and Citizens of Collier County This section of the Plan highlights a few key findings from the extensive research conducted for the cultural assessment. More complete data are available in a separate technical appendix. Information relating to organizational budgets and lists is presented in aggregate form only. Organizational Survey The following section describes the county's arts and cultural groups in quantitative terms - the impact and numbers associated with nonprofit Cultural activities in the county (thereby excluding "for profit" art activities such as commercial art galleries, book and music stores, recording studios, and so forth~ as well any impact on the economy by individual visual and performing artists). Another section, entitled The Arts CommuniOn, offers descriptions of the individual groups and showcases some of their contributions to the conm~unity. From a sample of 20 organizations, it can be sunwaarized that the cultural sector in Collier County accounts for: · Nearly 700 performances and 100 exhibits and festivals attract just under one million visitors and audiences each year. · Another 20,000 attend 700 classes and educational programs, in addition to outreach and student programs that provide close to 75,000 educational experiences for students in Collier County. · Full-time jobs for ahnost 200, with more than 300 contractors and part-timers also employed. · An annual impact on the region's economy, based on government and industry benchmarks, in the range of $125-$175 million am~ually, including some 4,000-5~000 additional "jobs created" (through secondary spending). ~ ~ Audience ancillary spending estimates (1994, California), $8 above ticket cost spent per paid local attender, $35 above ticket cost spent per paid tourist attencler, 80°/6 of paid attendance is local (including seasonal residents), 20% tourist, 50% of total attendance is unpaid, 50% paid. total attendance = 908. 000 visits/year; [h~ited States Department of Commerce RI&~t,S' II multipliers for arts and cultural inclust~:V: Operating expenditures = 2. 49 x direct spending (of approximatel, v $40 million), audience AM, g Planning & Research Page 5 October 2002 "Cultural Collier '-.4 Cultural Assessment & Plan · Well in excess of 100,000 volunteer hours! File Analysis Intercept Survey Six cultural groups (Marco Island Film Festival, Naples Art Association, Irish- American Club, Neapolitan Barbershop Chorus, Classic Chamber Concerts, Actors Repertory Theater) submitted a total of 9,000 household addresses for analysis. The analysis yielded the following findings:: The market area is fairly well centered on Naples, with 25% of audiences coming from 3 ZIP codes, and half coming from 7. The market does extend into Lee County, especially the Bonita Springs area. An analysis of lifestyle segmentation reveals a diverse public being served by these cultural groups. Predominant lifestyle segments include the traditional arts attending (and often empty nester or parents of teens) "Mid-Life Successers," the Ali-American family "Home Sweet Home" segment, younger "non-family" households (such as the "A Good Step Forward" segment), and a substantial base among a few different seniors segments (Domestic Duos, Secure Adults - see appendix for additional information). · These top five segments account for 53% of the arts attender list and 38% of market. Surveys were administered by Arts Council staff and volunteers at a variety of locations throughout Collier County, including festivals, grocery stores, libraries, and other public gathering places. A Spanish-language version was offered as an option for respondents in the Immokalee area. A total of 354 completed surveys were received. From the intercept survey we learned: · About 19% of respondents are considered seasonal residents or visitors, residing in Collier County less than 6 months each year. · About half of all respondents have lived in the county i=or 10 or more years, with 30% living in town four years or less. ancillary expenditures = 1.99 x spending, capital spending = 2. 07 x spending. (]t can be assumed that, by including commercial art activities, direct spending is at least in the range of $50 Million annuall~v, accounting perhaps for up to $200 g¥illion in annual economic impact.) 2 Thefile analysis is intended to provide a snapshot ofaudience sonl. vfor those organizations that xubmitted list& and is by no means intended to represent an overall picture of cultural audiences in Collier Court.ry. Ag4,S' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 6 "Cultural Collier "-,4 Cultural Assessment & Plan · Fully 77% of all respondents reported attending at least one live performing arts event in Collier County during the past year, compared to only 25% who attended in Lee County, 13% elsewhere on Florida's West Coast, and 12% elsewhere in the state. Year-round residents and those without children living at home are more likely to be frequent attenders (attending five or more events annually) by wide margins. · Almost three-quarters of all respondents reported attending at least one visual art exhibit in Collier County during the past year, whereas fewer than 10% reported doing so in Lee County or elsewhere in Florida. · The Philharmonic Center for the Arts was the venue attended most recently for any type of cultural event by the majority of respondents, followed by an outdoor art festival, Naples Dinner Theatre, and Cambier Park Bandshell. · Lack of time and the cost of attending were the most frequently cited reasons for not attending more frequently, but for about 25% of respondents, difficulty accessing venues (e.g., lack of venues in Collier County and/or "too far to drive") and "lack of information" were also important factors. Those without children at home were more likely to cite time and cost as barriers, whereas those with kids were more likely to mention lack of information. · Theater, musical theater, popular and classical music, and festivals are the most preferred types of cultural programs. Seasonal residents showed a relatively high interest in lectures and historical programs (about 32% interested compared to only 21% of year-round residents). · Reading, spending time with family, and exercise are cited most often as activities competing for respondents' spare time; entertaining at home is a major pastime of seasonal residents (55% cite as a competing activity compared to only 33% of year-round residents). · Painting/drawing, photography, and cermnics are the types of classes of most interest to those surveyed', acting, film, ballet/other dance are of least interest. Art and music appreciation are significantly more interesting to those with children living at home. · Sampler ticket packages, dinner/theater packages, web sites and visitor itineraries rated highly mnong most respondent groups. · More than 77% of respondents (with no difference by seasonal/year-round) believe local and county govermnents should provide funding for arts and culture; respondents with children were slightly more in favor of local and county govermnent funding than those without (about 83% to 77%). · Survey respondents would like to see funding targeted at youth and senior programs, art in public places, and festivals. Seasonal residents were again particularly interested in funding lectures and seminars (38% versus 16% of year-round residents). AMS' Planning & Research Page 7 October 2002 "Cultural Collier"-A Cultural Assessment & Plan Local newspapers are by far the most frequently cited source of information on cultural events (by 90%) followed by family/friends (50%) and radio (36%). AMS Planning & Research October 2002 Page 8 Our Community in Context What We Learned from Other Local Arts Agencies What is a Local Arts Agency (I_AA)? In order to understand how the United Arts Council fits within a context of other arts councils nationally, research was conducted with a national service organization (Americans for the Arts) and with a specially-selected sample of "peer group" arts councils. This section summarizes these efforts. According to Americans for the Arts3, a national advocacy and service organization serving the more than 4,000 "LAAs" across the nation, a local arts agency is a private community organization or local government agency that supports cultural organizations, provides services to artists or arts organizations, and/or presents arts programming to the public. LAAs endeavor to make the arts part of the daily fabric of community living. Each LAA is unique to the community that it serves, and each changes as fast as its community changes. However, all seek to serve the diverse art forms in their community and make them accessible to every community member. All LAAs are involved in one or more of the following: Cultural programming. 88% present cultural programming in the form of music, dance, drama, visual arts, arts education, art in public places, festivals, literature readings, and more. IThe UAC of Collier County has not focused on programming, with the notable exception of the Dig the Arts Festival. · Grant making. 61% provide financial support to arts organizations and/or artists. The UAC's Conm~unity Arts Fund represents its grant making activity. · Arts education. 61% implement programs and activities such as supporting artists in schools, designing curricula, and/or advocating for arts education. 3 Americans for the Arts conducts an extensive triennial sura,ey to measure the status and condition of the local arts agenc, v field. The moxt recent findings were published August 2001 in a monograph entitled "Local Arts Agency Facts Fiscal }'ear 2000." AMS' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 9 "Cultural Collier" - A Cultural A xsessment & Plan Collier County's arts council is very active in arts education, primarily through its Very Special Arts and Kaleidoscope programs. Facility management. 65% manage one or more cultural facilities such as rehearsal and performance spaces, gallery space, museums, or cooperative office "incubators." IThe UAC do,es not currently manage any facilities. Services to artists and arts organizations. Most LAAs provide services to local artists and arts organizations - including seminars and workshops, technical assistance, fundraising, block booking, central accounting and marketing, group health insurance, and advocacy. IThe United Arts Council's monthly Arts Forum luncheons and guest spcakcr I programs are one way m which it fulfills this popular LAA function. I Community cultural planning. 31% lead the community-inclusive process of assessing the cultural needs of the conm~unity and mapping a plan of implementation. IThe UAC's sponsorship of this Cultural Assessment represents its foray into cUltural planning for the community. Collaborations and partnerships. Nearly all (91%) collaborate with community organizations or local governments to integrate the arts more fully into their community and to assist those agencies in achieving their missions (e.g., economic development departments to develop cultural districts, chambers of commerce to attract new businesses, parks and recreation departments to create after-school programs, convention and visitors bureaus to increase cultural tourism, and police departments to prevent crime). As noted throughout the earlier section, the UAC participates in a series of partnerships with a wide range of community organizations and govermnent agencies. The Americans for the Arts monograph provides a range of statistics that can serve as useful benchn~arks for the Collier County planning process, including: · Of the approximately 4,000 LAAs in the United States, 75% are private nonprofit agencies, and 1,200 have paid, professional staff. AMS Planning & Research October 2002 Page 10 "Cultural Collier"-A Cultural Assessment & Plan Financial support from city and county governments accounts for 33% of all LAA revenues: local government support has increased an average of 13% annually since 1997. In terms of LAAs whose service area populations range from 100,000 to 500,0004: (see comparable statistics for the United Arts Council in the table following this section) · Private nonprofits have average annual budgets of about $675,000 · 16% of revenues come from local governments, 14% from other public sources · 22% receive funds from hotel/motel taxes, 17% from percent-for-art ordinances, 10% through property levies · On average, five full- and six part-time staff are augmented by 15 contractors and 100 volunteers · 75% offer programs for "at-risk" youth, 66% are active in economic development, 37% in crime prevention programs · 56% partner with other agencies to provide cultural tourism programs and activities · 73% produce arts calendars, 78% publish newsletters and other publications, 73% have web sites Model Case Studies Interviews were conducted with a "peer group" of 8 nonprofit/special district arts councils in Sarasota, Pinellas, Brevard, and Hillsborough counties in Florida, and in Santa Cruz (CA), Horry County (SC), Scottsdale (AZ), and Asheville (NC). Five of this group of councils serve markets in the 200-300,000 range, comparable with UAC's service area population of 259,000. The following table summarizes the results of the interviews: 4 The Fiscal 2000 Local Arts Agency Facts monograph is based on a total sample of 454 LAA& of which 88 are private, nonprofit agencies sero,lng communities of lO0, 000- 500, 000 people. AMS Planning & Research October 2002 Page 11 "Cultural Collier"-A Cultural Assessment & ?lan Total Budget $938,857 $287,000 Local Government $125,143 $0 Funding County Government $331,643 $0 Funding State Government $55,000 $30,000 Funding Total Public Funding $511,786 $30,000 Per'Capita Funding $2.44 $1.11 Public Funding Per $1.00 0.12¢ Capita Ag&g Planning & Research October 2002 ?%~'e 12 "Unifying Principles" The Overall Themes That Provide a Foundation for the Plan What is a Cultural Plan? For the last two decades, more than 400 communities across America have endeavored to develop "blueprints" for cultural development. For many years, the National Endowment for the Arts and many state arts councils required local arts agencies (e.g., nonprofit arts councils, govenm~ent offices of cultural affairs) to complete a cultural plan in order to receive grant funds. The primary, motivation in requiring plans was to ensure that arts councils were serving their communities in relevant and appropriate ways. The essence of a cultural plan is a needs assessment process, designed to take stock of interests and opinions of artists, citizens, cultural groups, and other "stakeholders." Following from an assessment of needs, the plan itself typically consists of "goals, objectives, strategies and tactics," action steps that detail how the arts council, along with strategic parmers, should develop programs and services to address the identified needs. The central premise is that by implementing these programs and services, the community will be a better place for artists and cultural groups to produce their work, and that more citizens will participate (as audiences, volunteers, actors, dancers, writers, visitors, and so on) and enjoy the community's cultural offerings. Other benefits would also be realized - impact on the economy, improved quality of life, beautification of the conununity (through public art), improved learning opportunities for the county's young people (through comprehensive arts education), and so on. The Plan as "Structural" Solution This Plan represents a coming together of arts, cultural, heritage and other organizations that are concerned with Collier County's quality of life. It is grounded in the theory that the forging of strategic partnerships among the arts and other sectors is a critical key to successful long-term development of the arts and culture in the County. The Plan document is intended to provide a unifying focus for existing cultural and conununity organizations rather than recolmnending many new organizations, programs and activities. The "Vision for Collier County's Cultural Future" lays a structural groundwork by which arts, social, neighborhood and cmmnunity organizations can respond, cooperatively, to issues and concerns of the region's citizens and visitors. It is hoped that this Plan will assist the county in fulfilling its AMS Planning & Research October 2002 Page 13 "Cultural Collier"-A Cultural Assessment & Plan vision as a place that values quality of life and provides for the cultural enrichment of its residents and visitors. The Plan is for everyone, not just arts administrators and government officials, it will be implemented by drawing on the resources of citizens, volunteers, neighborhood groups, social clubs, small and large businesses, and a diverse cross-section of the County's residents and workers. Two Unifying Principles Most cultural plans entail a series of goals, usually between four and twelve statements of intent, covering topics ranging from arts education to public art and audience development. The Collier County Cultural Vision also contains a series of goals and objectives covering the specific topics that emerged from the research as priorities for the County. During the course of research and planning, a strong consensus emerged around two themes that serve as central principles for the rest of the Plan's substance. These unifying principles can be described as follows: Enhance and expand access to arts, cultural, and heritage resources by the region's residents and visitors Providing resources to ensure a healthy, sustainable community of cultural organizations and artists It is through these two prisms that rest of the County's Cultural Vision should be understood. Moreover, it should be noted that throughout this document, "culture" is defined in the broadest sense of the term, intended to encompass fine arts, heritage, folk traditions, and other expressions. Following are sections of the Plan covering specific goals and objectives making up the "vision," recommendations relating to the United Arts Council, and further highlights of the research. A~IS Planning & Research October 2002 Page 14 Goals and Objectives A "Cultural Vision" for Collier County Symbols Throughout this section of the Cultural Plan, the following symbols are used to denote the various objectives: Denotes a priority objective as determined by a vote of the Steering Committee. It is the Committee's intent that priority objectives be the focus of initial implementation efforts. Other objectives should be pursued as opportunities (e.g., funding sources, volunteer resources, facility developments, etc.) arise. Denotes other objectives that are no less important steps in accomplishing the stated goal under which they fall. These tasks and steps should be pursued when opportunities to assist with implementation become available. Used to signify a list of specific action steps related to the overall objective, or implementation steps or guidelines to assist in defining the objective under which it falls. These items are often advisory in nature, or concern tactics and strategies related to accomplishing the objective. AMS Planning & Research October 2002 Page 15 Goal A: "Cultural Collier '-A Cultural Assessment & Plan Involve more of the public, more often, in cultural activities Rationale As noted in the "Unifying Principles" section of this Cultural Plan, a major underpinning of the plan is the desire to improve access to arts and cultural opportunities. Arts activities, such as community theater, have been described as modem-day "neighborly rituals" in times when shared harvests and other cormnunity traditions have vanished. Whereas more than half of respondents to the intercept survey noted that "time with family" competes for spare time, it should be possible to "position" arts and cultural activities as fulfilling this need, among others. Other research results indicate that Collier County residents are hungry for more information about cultural activities, with 34% indicating they want more direct mail brochures. When the 1998 White House Conference on Tourism identified "Cultural Tourism" as a high-growth and high-potential area, conununities across the nation began brainstorming programs and promotions to lure cultural tourists, a decidedly upscale travel segment. Cultural tourism has been defined as "based on the mosaic of places, traditions, art forms, celebrations, and experiences" that define an area. According to a survey conducted by the Travel Industry Association of America, one-third of all adult United States travelers included either a visit to an historic place or cultural event on their itineraries. Research has documented the facts that cultural and heritage visitors spend more, stay longer, are more likely to stay in lodging, use air travel, shop, and pursue "shoulder season" (e.g., often spring and fall visits falling outside of typical peak travel months) visits than the average traveler and are a growing segment of the United States travel market. It is the intent of the Steering Committee that this goal prioritizes a range of approaches to better promoting the county's cultural resources, as well as to develop a concerted, strategic promotion of Collier County as a cultural destination. Objectives Pursue collaborative marketing and audience development approaches such as cooperative databases, scheduling calendars, media buying, Web sites, etc. Establish cultural tourism programs and packages that combine cultural, historic and other attractions (e.g., nature centers, botanical gardens, Lake Trafford, Roberts Ranch, famier's markets, recreation, golf, and so on). Focus on marketing and advertising targeting a range of visitor segments (e.g., AMS' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 16 "Cultural Collier"-A Cultura! Assessment & Plan those visiting friends and relatives [VFR], seasonal, tourist, regional day- tripper, etc.). [] Develop ticket subsidy and distribution programs including "rush" tickets. pay-as-you-can nights, permission-based e-mail distribution, endowed subscriptions for teachers and students, etc. [] Support the development of new programs, implemented by UAC's member agencies, such as a countywide choral concert and/or arts festival, a new playwrights series, literary events, and so forth. [] Conduct outreach to the diverse and underserved communities within the county, and explore transportation options to make cultural venues more accessible. [] Work with community facilities (schools, recreation centers, etc.) and other alternative venues (cafes, malls, parks, etc.) for outreach progran~ming to reach new potential audiences. [] Encourage more off-season programming to more effectively serve year-round residents. Goal B: Offer arts education for the citizenry, from preschoolers through "elder-hostelers" Rationale Recent research now provides conclusive evidence that children who partake of a comprehensive arts education curriculum perform better in all aspects of school work: from math and science test scores to team-building and social skill development. This goal is intended to increase participation in arts and culture by the young people of Collier County, to raise conununity expectations for the cultural enrichment these children will enjoy, establish high standards for arts education programs, and facilitate arts and cultural expression by the county's young generation. It is the vision of the Steering Cormnittee that a mutually beneficial relationship can be nurtured between the county's public school district and its arts, cultural, and heritage orgmfizations, individual artists, supporters and advocates. In addition to arts education opportunities for the county's young people, this goal contains an objective related to expanding and strengthening community-based arts education. In the development of this goal and its objectives, attention has been paid to a national trend regarding an increase in participation in adult and cormnunity-based education programs. Partly due to the aging of the Boomer generation, early retirements, and the accompanying "empty nester" syndrome (all AMS Planning & Research October 2002 Page 17 "Cultural Collier"-A Cultural Assesxment & Plan Objectives particularly evident in Collier County), adults are returning to public schools. colleges and universities for educational experiences. Many arts and cultural organizations across the country, have also seized upon this trend and are using educational programs as a marketing approach. In Des Moines, "Broadway University" incorporates group attendance at touring musicals with pre- and post- show lectures and discussions. The social aspects of the program, often involving spouses and close friends, also serve to position the arts as a fun, social, m~d educational leisure experience. Organize a public advocacy campaign involving private sector leadership, arts and cultural organization board members, artists and concemed citizens targeting consistent, high-quality arts education programs (e.g., minimum contact hours, credentialed specialists, curriculum integration, etc.). = The campaign would require the participation of several constituencies: educators, parents, students, business people, representatives of higher learning educational institutions, arts and cultural organizations, and audience members. Advocacy "tool kits" can be obtained from national arts service organizations (such as Americans for the Arts). A fom~al work plan should be developed calling on volunteer resources to identify current program gaps and needs, evaluate to what extent current programs are at risk, develop a "wish list" for an ideal arts education program, and slowly build support among key constituents for maintenance, and later expansion, of such programs. ~ The region's arts and cultural organizations should be seen as a critical resource in providing a well-rounded education to the region's young people. Initiatives designed to involve this generation as arts attenders and participators should go hand-in-hand with curriculum-based and program objectives. Create targeted audience development initiatives to improve access to arts and cultural resources by school students: = cultural event information through electronic mail m~d posters at school site bulletin boards = develop complimentary "sponsored" ticket programs for students = create new (repeat) attendance incentives through existing educational programs (such as discount tickets for family and friends) [] Establish a series of"familiarity" events and materials to link the region's arts and cultural program providers with schools, including: = An arts education resource directory (for distribution to art, music, PE, English, and .other teachers, the media, librarians, etc.) AMS Planning & Research Page 18 October 2002 "Cultural Collier"-,4 Cultural Assessment & Plan = An arts education resource fair to showcase assembly, residency, and other "enrichment" opportunities Work with appropriate partners to expand student/public interface opportunities: = Student art exhibits in public spaces (events center, libraries, etc.) = Scholarships and awards programs = Concerts, appearance at festivals, etc. Recent national trends suggest increasing enrollments in adult education programs: many new classes are being developed in the culinary arts, gardening, photography, m~d other creative pursuits. Adult and community education programs should be seen simultaneously as audience development opportunities. Work with partners to expand opportunities for community arts education programs including: = intergenerational corm~unity-based arts classes = coordinated scheduling of arts and cultural classes to facilitate concurrent attendance by younger students and parents Goal C: Rationale Provide support services to cultural organizations and individual artists The foundation of many cultural plans is promotion of a range of services for cormnunity-based arts and cultural organizations and individual artists. The research revealed a countywide arts sector consisting of many all-volunteer (or understaffed) arts organizations. These groups can benefit from professional development opportunities in marketing, fundraising, audience development, organizational management, and so forth. Individual artists can also be assisted through promotion of "goods and services" to consumers and local businesses. Throughout the nation both nonprofit organizations and commercial businesses are exploring partnerships and "shared service" initiatives amongst themselves and between each other and sectors of the community. Education, human services, and government partnerships abound in service of economic and conm~unity development, based on recognition of common concerns and opportunities. In many ways, the overall cultural plan is a recognition of the need for arts and cultural groups to join efforts. This goal contains general and specific strategies for providing support services and nurturing collaborations in Collier County. AMS' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 19 "Cultural Collier ' - ,4 Cultural,4 ssessment & Plan Obj'ectives Inventory and explore opportunities for collaborations and partnerships mnong arts, cultural, and heritage organizations, and between the cultural sector and other organizations and agencies (e.g., businesses, schools, social service groups, other nonprofits, chambers of commerce, tourism industry, etc.). [] Develop a range of technical assistance and marketing programs to meet the needs of individual artists in the region Identify and secure space for ongoing and temporary exhibitions, artist studios, and sales galleries = Work with chambers of commerce and individual businesses to facilitate business showcase of regional artists and art rental (loan) program Work with real estate industry professionals (e.g., realtors, developers, decorators, etc.) to promote sales by local artists = Offer "buy direct" seminars about art purchase opportunities at area fairs, high school exhibits, libraries, and other "discount" outlets Host meet-the-artist receptions, lectures, openings, and other public programs at libraries and other public and private spaces = Integrate artist-in-residence program at farmer's markets and other non- traditional public event settings = Consider developing an "Entrepreneurship" program for individual visual and performing artists working with local colleges and universities (perhaps offered as a summer residential workshop marketed regionally) [] Work with appropriate partners to expand the base of volunteer support for . cultural groups in the region [] Continue offering monthly Arts Forum meetings while exploring ways to incorporate more technical assistance and/or strategic partnerships (e.g., presentations by related sectors with development of mini-action plans out of each session) [] A full range of professional development programs and technical assistance services should be instituted for the region's cultural organizations, including: = Scheduling calendars Shared marketing, research, and audience development = Collective advocacy for expanded media coverage Development of helpful resources such as media list, service business directories (e.g., equipment rentals), etc. = Exchange newsletters = "Meet the Press" and other workshops AA¥,$' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 20 Goal D: "Cultural Collier "-.4 Cultural ,4ssessnlent & Plan Encourage the creation, renovation, and adaptation of facilities for cultural activities throughout the county Rationale Cultural facilities to accommodate performances, exhibitions, rehearsals, classes, and the creation of artwork represent an important cornerstone in the culture of a community. It is often difficult for arts and cultural organizations to grow and thrive without adequate venues that are welcoming and comfortable for audiences and visitors, and technically suitable for artists. Moreover, the vast geographic scope of the County almost necessitates a network of community-based spaces to facilitate performances/exhibitions, as nearly 1 in 5 respondents to the community survey indicated that travel distance is a barrier to attendance. As Collier County continues to experience population growth, many involved in this planning process have noted the need to develop new, and better utilize existing facilities to accommodate a growing supply of cultural programs. O~/ectives [] Work with appropriate partners to encourage and support the development of new, small theater spaces (perhaps in the range of 150-250 seats, as identified through the research) [] Consider development of a community, nonprofit exhibit space and additional classrooms for arts and cultural programs [] Investigate opportunities for providing support space for performing arts organizations (e.g., rehearsal, production, etc.) [] Work with appropriate parmers to develop artist work/exhibit space in redevelopment areas [] Work with appropriate partners to support efforts of Marco Island constituents to develop a cultural center and history museum Goal E: Rationale Advocate for Collier County's "cultural vision" Increasingly around the nation, supporters of cultural organizations are beconfing more sophisticated in their advocady efforts, ranging from the establislm~ent of a political action co~mnittee (in San Francisco) to the more frequent undertaking of economic impact and other studies to demonstrate the importance of arts and cultural sectors. It is reflective of the Steering Committee's concern to adequately AMS' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 21 "Cultural Collier "-A Cultural Assessment & Plan promote Collier County's cultural vision that the single objective under this goal received, by far, the most votes when prioritizing the Plan's objectives. The Committee, along with the UAC Board and regular participants in the UAC's arts forum, represents an important base of volunteer advocates who are committed to furthering the advancement of arts and culture in Collier County. Objectives Pursue a coordinated advocacy campaign to promote the cultural plan through: = Integration of arts concerns into other "agendas" (e.g., redevelopment of Bayshore, tourism development, natural resources, social services organizations, etc.) = Education of elected officials about arts impact, desirable assistance from public agencies (e.g., Via Colore example), etc. = Hosting candidate forums and other events to influence elected officials Goal F: Rationale Secure new sources of private and public funding to achieve the cultural vision During the process of creating this Cultural Plan, careful attention has been paid to making the objectives pragmatic, opportunistic, and achievable. A variety of partnerships and methods to work more cohesively are proposed in anticipation of a more unified and sustainable arts community. Respondents to the intercept survey offered resounding support for using local and county government dollars for arts and culture (more than 67% in favor). A few important funding and resource initiatives should be pursued in order to make significant progress on this Plan's vision, and see Collier County's cultural community as a vital element in the County's overall economic and conm~unity development efforts. Objectives Work with city and county officials, including Tourism Development Corm~ission members, to identify and secure new, dedicated public funding sources for re-granting, operations, marketing/awareness campaigns, and other identified needs through, potentially: Reallocation of Tourism Development Council (TDC) funds Creation of a municipal special taxing unit (MSTU) AMS Planning & Research October 2002 Page 22 "Cultural Collier"-,d Cultural,4ssessment & Plan 5A Creation and/or expansion of a community redevelopment area/agency (CRA) Work closely with the Community Foundation of Collier County to identi~; and secure private donations to the Cultural Endowment Fund Goal G: Rationale [Work to incorporate art in public places Collier County has a jump start on public art through the recent Gators Galore project sponsored by the Naples Art Association and Boys & Girls Club. Establishment of a dedicated art-in-public-places program might involve murals, sculpture, and artist-designed, public infrastructure projects such as sewer covers, benches, and light poles, and could involve incorporating artists on planning and architectural teams. Objectives The United Arts Council should work with appropriate partners (e.g.: the City ofNaples's Public Art Advisory Committee; the cities of Marco Island, Everglades City, and Immokalee; Collier County; FitCh Avenue South Association; etc.) to advocate for preparation of an art in public places ordinance and plan. Typically, such a municipal ordinance can apply to public expenditures (e.g., city capital improvement project budgets) and/or private developer fees. A logical first step would entail the passage of a public ordinance; the ordinance could include a resolution encouraging (but not requiring) private developers to identify opportunities for the incorporation of art in public places into their buildings, public plazas, and so forth. The Arts Council could encourage the establishment of a cormnittee to work with such developers in providing lists of recommended artists (for involvement with architect and design teams) or for discussions on art-in-public-places program priorities for installations of public art in private developments. A public percent-for-art ordinance typically provides between 1% and 2% of capital improvement project budgets for the commissioning, fabrication, and maintenance of art in public places (such as murals, sculptures, and public infrastructure). Administration of the program would be the domain cfa governmental entity such as the City of Naples, which would establish peer review panels to issue requests for proposals, sponsor competitions, and select artists and artworks. Review panels should include representation from the United Arts Council, arts m~d AMS' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 23 "Cultural Collier"-A Cultural Assessment & Plan design professionals (e.g., architects, artists, engineers), city staff (from related departments such as public works), and at-large members representing the community. It is also preferable that representatives of specific neighborhoods in which artworks might be located be involved in the selection process. The public art plan would consist of a comprehensive set of program guidelines relating to selection policies and procedures, goals of the program (e.g., that any art in public places program prioritize artworks that somehow relate thematically to Collier County's heritage), and other related city policies (e.g., such as relating to gifts of artworks, purchase of copyrights). Goal H: Rationale Objectives Strengthen and expand the United Arts Council Members of the Steering Committee were adamant that a concerted effort be made to strengthen the ability of the County's local arts agency to facilitate development of the County's arts and cultural sector. As noted in the research sections of this document, the United Arts Council operates a full complement of programs on a budget about one-third that of its "peer" group of agencies, and with virtually no public dollars. Those responsible for this Plan's creation believe strongly that the UAC can provide an important leadership role in implementing this Cultural Plan, but will need additional human and financial resources to do so, and more widespread acknowledgement of the important roles it currently plays. [] The Council should engage in comprehensive promotion of its full range of programs and services, highlighting its model programs targeting underserved communities and special target constituencies (as aligned with important human and social services functions) [] Work with the Community Foundation of Collier County and other parmers to attract higher levels of private donations, targeting increases to the UAC's cultural endowment fund with the Foundation [] Secure a donor relations staff person to work with professional financial advisers and other related professions [] Consider renmning the organization to reflect its embrace of all "cultural" organizations (e.g., not just arts groups), and to project a more easily recognizable "brand" (e.g., Cultural Collier, Collier Cultural Consortium, etc.) Ag/IS Planning & Research October 2002 Page 24 "Cultural Collier "-.4 CulturaI Assessment & Plan -q Pursue an arrangement to oversee regranting of TDC funds (and other possible local/county funding sources) for arts, cultural, and related recipients [] Secure in-kind donations of office space and equipment (possibly through county government) to alleviate an ongoing cost of operation and take advantage of proximity to strategic partners AMS Planning & Research October 2002 Page 25 Implementation Priorities, Responsibilities and Benefits of Implementing the Cultural Plan Overall Benefits Goal A: Benefits Implementing Collier County's cultural plan is envisioned to result in the following overall benefits: · Local groups will operate more effectively through individual effort and mutual cooperation. · Public interest, awareness, education and participation in cultural activities will increase. · There will be a positive economic impact as more cultural dollars are kept at home in Collier County, as more dollars relating to culture are generated, and as more people move to the area as a result of its high quality of life. · Cultural issues will become an integral part of government policy and partnerships; its legitimacy and importance will be assumed on the part of local governments. Involve more of the public, more often, in cultural activities The United Arts Council should work with appropriate partners, such as local and regional tourism promotion agencies, chambers of commerce, individual cultural institutions, commercial advertising/marketing firms, and volunteers to spearhead a series of marketing and promotional efforts. Funding may be sought from private foundations (for "shared" marketing .initiatives) and from TDC funds. Pro bono assistance should be recruited from retired volunteers (former marketing/advertising executives) and local finns. The benefits of involving more people in cultural activities are obvious to the arts sector, largely through the influx of additional earned income (ticket sales, memberships, tuition, etc.), but also through the building of a larger support base that may be called upon to advocate for the County's cultural plan. AA/ES' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 26 "Cultural Collier" - A Cultural Assessment & Plan Goal B: lOffer arts education for the citizenry, from preschoolers through "elder-hostelers" Xtl'ztctl, tre Benefits Goal C: Stru ctu re Benefits The United Arts Council is best positioned to coordinate a coalition of arts education advocates and partners. The UAC should enlist appropriate partners, in addition to the public school district, to include libraries and cultural organizations, board members and other volunteers. Funding from private sources, school districts, national foundations, and other government agencies may be sought. The direct benefits of improved arts education will affect the region's young people in a myriad of ways, including, as a body of national research concludes, higher test scores, greater team-building capacities, lower drop-out rates, and a more well-rounded student body. Cultural organizations will have the benefit of training an audience for the future as well as the artists, technicians, and board members to sustain the cultural groups into the next decades and beyond. Members of the COlnmunity will have more opportunities for adult education in arts, culture, heritage, and related areas. Provide support services to cultural organizations and individual artists The UAC has likely partners to implement this goal in the form of the Cormnunity Foundation of Collier County and the region's institutions of higher learning. UAC should evaluate ways to enhance the monthly Arts Forum through expanded technical assistance offerings. The Foundation and area colleges/universities should be targeted to assist with funding these activities; program fees (tuition) can also be considered to defray costs. Cultural organizations will be better able to market, raise funds, manage themselves and allow artists to pursue their creative endeavors. Individual artists would have more opportunities to sell their works and market their services to a wider public. AMS' Planning & Research Page 27 October 2002 Goal D: "Cultural Collier "-A Cultural Assessment & Plan Encourage the creation, renovation, and adaptation of facilities for cultural activities throughout the county Stl2tctItl'e The United Arts Council is envisioned to play a supportive role in this arena, working alongside developers, government agencies, and individual cultural organizations that seek to create/renovate performance and e,xhibit venues. UAC can play an advocacy role in working to expand access to existing venues. Funding for facilities will require a public/private combination; in addition to capital and operating dollars, innovative funding incentives (e.g., tax credits, low- interest loans) may be considered. Benefits More, better, and more accessible cultural venues are seen as a key ingredient in furthering the county's cultural sector, in allowing more groups more ways to reach a wider audience. Goal E: Structure Benefits Advocate for the Collier County's "cultural vision" ] The UAC board and collective boards of other cultural organizations should adopt this overall priority of the cultural plan; resources from national service organizations (such as Americans for the Arts) should be sought to develop a coordinated advocacy approach. The UAC board should assume the relatively low costs of organizing advocacy activities. The Steering Connnittee, by a wide margin, voted to make this goal (and its objectives) a top priority of the Cultural Plan, based largely on the belief that implementation of the entire plan can only follow from a more concerted effort to advocate for the arts and cultural vision countywide. Enlisting new partners and generating a wider base of support are cornerstones, and major benefits, of this approach. .dA~/,S' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 28 "Cultural Collier "-A Cultural Aar~'essment & Plan Goal F: Secure new sources of private and public funding to achieve the cultural vision Structure Again, the UAC has an important partner in this area by working closely with the Conununity Foundation of Collier County, and by (as proposed) hiring a new donor relations (development) staff member. Benefits The UAC can only play a leadership role through the injection of new human and financial resources. Funding the Plan's proposed goals and objectives will result in the numerous benefits described above. Goal G: [ Work to incorporate art in public places Structure Benefits As with the facilities goal, the United Arts Council is envisioned to play a supportive role in this arena, working alongside developers, government agencies, and individual cultural organizations that seek to establish public art programs and projects. The UAC can advocate for an art in public places ordinances. Funding would typically involve both public (through a percent-for-art ordinance) and private funds. Many conununities have adopted the inclusion of public art as a cornerstone of efforts to create livable, vibrant, and aesthetically-pleasing spaces. Attracting cultural tourists and exposing a wider public to the arts are also results of public art programs. Goal H: Strengthen and expand the United Arts Council Strucmre The UAC board should prioritize objectives to strengthen the organization's ability to play a leadership role in Plan implementation. Operating funds should be sought from municipal and county governments in addition to traditional funding sources. AMS Planning & Research October 2002 P%ge 29 "Cultural Collier"-A Cultural Assessmen! & Plan Benefits As noted earlier, the UAC can only play a leadership role through the injection of new human and financial resources. Funding the Plan's proposed goals and objectives will result in the numerous benefits described above. AMS' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 30 The Arts Community Anecdotes and .Evidence of How the Arts Infuse our Lives Please note: This section is not intended to represent a comprehensive listing arts and cultural organizations in Collier County, but rather a summary of notable programs from organizations that responded to the organizational survey. Actors Repertory Theater The Actors Repertory Theater is the Naples area's resident professional theater/performing arts organization. The company recently toured a Christmas production to several assisted-living facilities, offering performances at no charge. The troupe hopes to add a children's theater program to tour area schools in the near future. Art League of Marco Island City of Naples Cultural Arts Programs The Art League's mission is to sponsor and promote the study of, appreciation and support for, and interest in the visual arts and allied and related creative arts mad crafts. Classes in many media, workshops, exhibits, both in their newly expanded galleries and on the grounds, are offered along with scholarships, children's classes and programs. The Art League offers four outdoor arts mad crafts shows each year, attracting artists from various northern states and the southeast. During the school year, the Art League offers the Art Talks program involving 20 volunteers in elementary and middle schools to discuss a selected artist m~d a particular work. · The City of Naples offers a wide range of programs, including a series of free Sunday concerts at the recently renovated Cambier Park band shell in downtown Naples. · Free Shakespeare in the Park productions are also a benefit for local residents. AMS Planning & Research Page 3 l October 2002 "Cultural Collier" - A Cultural Assessment & Plan Classic Chamber Concerts Collier County Museum Gulf Coast Big Band Low-cost art and theater classes are offered for adults and children in the city's recreation facilities, and free programs for teens help keep them occupied and out of trouble. Classic Chamber Concerts seeks to provide world class music at affordable prices to the residents of southwest Florida and to encourage and educate young audiences to the joys of music. CCC's Concerts in the Schools program takes concert artists into area schools for 6 concerts a year, often including master classes, all offered at no charge to the schools. Classic Chamber is a partner in the United Arts Council-sponsored Kaleidoscope Program, serving at-risk youth with arts activities. The Collier County Museum in Naples consists of two historic homes, a steam locomotive, swamp buggy, lecture hall, exhibit gallery, and other artifacts on a 5-acre site. Some 10,000 school children visit the museum each year. In its 12th season, the Band performs Swing-era music from the 1930s through 1950s. Almost 30,000 people attend the Bm~d's 9 concerts in Naples and on Marco Island. The Sound of Swing scholarship progrmn provides funding for as many as 10 aspiring high school students to attend summer music camps each year. Since the inception of the scholarship progran~ 12 years ago, more than $33,000 has been awarded. International College · The Naples-based private college offers a "lifelong learning" Creative Retirement Center for seniors, with over 300 members, and overall student enrollment of more than 1,200. · Other progrmns include a speaker's bureau, fine arts lecture series, visual art exhibits, workshops and seminars. Local high school students were recently bused to a touring exhibit of photography, supported by the Community Foundation of Collier County. AMS' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 32 "Cultural Collier "-A Cultural Assessment & Plan Irish American Club International College sponsored the Summer Youth Camp 2002 with the NAACP, Collier County Branch,//5117. for area youth to experience classes in English, computer technology, and basic life skills. Twenty student graduates received a CHANCE Scholarship of a tuition-free associate's degree from International College. · With two annual Celtic festivals under its belt, the club, founded to promote the spirit of the Irish, their arts and culture, in Naples and Collier County, has plans to continue and grow. · The first annual festival drew more than 8,000 over two days and featured music, dance, food, and cultural programs for kids. Journey Arts Marco Island Film Festival Marco Island Players · This emerging arts organization is a producer/presenter of visual and performing arts, special exhibits, reader's theater, and music at alternative venues such as the Coffee Beanery caf6 and Koreshan State Park. · Journey Arts hopes to identify an industrial space as a home for alternative performing and visual arts activities. · The Festival's mission is "to contribute to education, awareness, and opportunities available to students pursuing a career in the film industry: to showcase and promote film projects developed by independent and student filmmakers; and to expose culturally and economically diverse children and adults to the business and art of cinematography." · Programs include screenings, panel discussions, international internships, "Kid Fest," and a national student film competition. · Through support of the Tourist Development Comnfission, the Festival offers hotel packages and is attracting more visitors to Marco and environs. Almost 9,000 people attended programs last year. This group operates a 90-seat conm~unity theater and produces almost 50 perforn~ances of four plays each year and a children's surmner theater workshop. A children's theatre program for 8-13 year olds features instruction in acting, production, directing, m~d technical aspects of theater, serving up to 40 students. AMS Planning & Research Page 33 October 2002 "Cultural Collier" - A Cultural Assessment & Plan The Players hope to grow into a 150-seat, more technically advanced theater some time in the future. Museum of the Everglades · A county-funded, 1920s building, renovated in 1998, is an important attraction in Everglades City (population 500), attracting some 13,000 visitors each year. · The Museum's exhibits, programs and special events serve a diverse visitor base ranging from 1,200 school children from the region, to local seniors and international visitors. · The museum restoration has received awards, including Rural Cormnunity of the Year, Great Floridians 2000 recognition, and a listing on the National Register. Naples Museum of Art Naples Music Club Naples Opera Society The Naples Museum of Art is the first, full-scale art museum in Southwest Florida, featuring a world-class permanent collection, traveling exhibitions and exclusive shows organized by the museum. The museum's mission is to inspire creativity and awaken curiosity while providing educational programs and lectures, as well as exhibitions. Museum and Galleries education programs include private docent-guided tours for students with interactive art projects that correlate to the exhibit the students are viewing. Museum progranuning also includes specifically designed programs for all school-age children and adult learners that focus on the permanent collections in the museum, and tie the exhibit not only to the information about the art but also the historical context and musical information that correlates to the period. The Naples Music Club promotes and fosters music in the Naples area through scholarships for student musicians and support of public school music programs. More than 100 children each year benefit from scholarships and classes. Almost 5,000 people attended a dozen free performances by members and visiting musicians offered in local churches and schools. The Naples Opera Society holds monthly meetings for members during "the season" (also open to the public), and provides educational programs and vocal concerts. AMS' Planning & Research October 2002 P%ge 34 "Cultural Collier" - A Cultural Assessment & Plan 5A Naples Philharmonic Orchestra Naples Players The Society sponsors trips to opera performances in Miami and Sarasota. As a community educational outreach, a limited number of local high school students with an interest in vocal music are invited as guests to attend the performances. As a group or with individual subscriptions, the members of the NOS support the touring opera performances at the Naples Philharmonic Center for the Arts. Future plans for the Naples Opera Society include a concert series for the season and the development of a scholarship program for vocalists. · The Naples Philharmonic Orchestra is increasingly recognized as one of the leading young orchestras in the United States. The mission of the Orchestra is to provide Southwest Florida with a steady and eclectic diet of classical and pops concerts, featuring world-class soloists and conductors and accomplished musicians from around the world. · In addition to regular classical, pops and chamber concerts the orchestra has international recording credits and has accompanied such renowned artists as Andrea Bocelli, Dmitri Hvorostovsky, Kiri Te Kanawa and the Monte Carlo Ballet in concert. The orchestra also reaches out with special community and school programs. · Orchestra education programs include Magic Carpet Concerts for preschool and early elementary grades, focusing on introducing different sections of the orchestra to students and their families. "A Trip to the Phil" is an orchestra concert designed for fifth- and seventh-grade students, and the study guide reinforces the interdisciplinary nature of the performing arts. · Outreach programs for the orchestra include ensembles going to the elementary schools on a yearly basis and the opportunity for high-school musicians to audition to perform side-by-side with members of the orchestra. The Sugden Theatre's convenient location in downtown Naples, combined with affordable tickets to this community theater company, helped attract almost 60,000 people to performances last year. Naples Players recemly established a new children's program, KidzAct, for children 8 to 15 years old. The year-round, performance-oriented progrm~ will teach all aspects of theater with scholarships supporting some 40% of students. AMS Planning & Research October 2002 Page 35 Naples Art Association/ von Liebig Art Center Philharmonic Center for the Arts "Cultural Collier"-,4 Cultural Asxessment & Plan · Opened to the public in 1998, the Naples Art Association's von Liebig Art Center provides changing exhibits and a permanent collection of American art since 1950, emphasizing work by Florida artists, and attracting more than 30,000 visitors (plus more than 60,000 who attend its annual outdoor art festivals). · Classes, lectures, and workshops are offered to adults and youth, supported by some 1,600 members, and attracting more than 30,000. The Naples Art Association sponsors surmner art camps in partnership with the Sugden Theater, featuring art and theater activities, and scholarship support for at-risk youth. After-school and weekend classes are offered throughout the school year. · "The Phil" is unique among arts centers in that it features both the performing and visual arts in a single complex and also hosts a resident orchestra. In addition to the 1,22 l-seat main hall and a 200-seat, black-box theater, the Phil has four museum-quality art galleries that showcase traveling and exclusive exhibitions. · Each season, the Phil is host to more than 400 individual events. The Center also provides programs for groups and schools. The Center has 250 full- and part-time employees, including a full-time administrative staff of 80, as well as several hundred volunteers. · The Philharmonic Center for the Arts offers extensive education and outreach programs for area school children. All programs are age-specific, from pre- kindergarten through high school. Some 42,000 school children participated in programs offered by the Philharmonic Center last year; study guides helped teachers integrate the experience of attending live performing arts with Sunshine State curriculum standards. · Among its programs for young people are a youth chorale and orchestra providing training for more than 150 budding musicians. The Philharmonic Center works in partnership with social service agencies, including QUEST, Big Brothers/Big Sisters, Colors Cultural Dance, and the Redlands Christian Migrant Association in hnmokalee. AA¥,$' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 36 "Cultural Collier "-.4 Cultural Asxessment & Plan Teddy Bear Museum of Naples · A museum devoted to the collection, education, and appreciation of the teddy bear as a sof~-sculpture art form. Displays include artist-created, manufactured and antique bears, archives, and classes in bear-making. · Special events include a Teddy Bear Fair and "Muffy Tea," outreach programs to nursing homes, and bear distribution to hospitalized children. · Local high school students participate in the Museum's programs through their conununity service requirement. AMS' Planning & Research October 2002 Page 37 United Arts Council of Collier County "Cultural Collier" Technical Appendix 5~ United Arts Council of Collier County "Cultural Collier" Intercept Survey Detail 354 Total Responses Intercept Survey Findings About half the sample are long-time residents, while seasonal residents are more likely to be more recent arrivals 90% 80% 70% 6O% 50% HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED IN COLLIER COUNTY (BY COLLIER COUNTY RESIDENCE STATUS) 4O% 3(P/o 2O% 10% 0% ~'_.:~;:'_.: All Respondelts (N=321~ [] Ten or more Years [] Five to Nine Years [] One to Four Years [] Less Than a Year Reside 6 months or less per year Reside 7 to 12 months pe~ year {N=247) Intercept Survey Findings RespondentS with children are more likely to be year-round residents 100% 90% 80% 700/0 60% 500/0 40%. 3O% 20% 10% 0% HOW MANY MONTHS OUT OF THE YEAR DOYOU "RESIDE" IN COLLIER COUNTY (BY CHILDREN UNDER 16 IN HOUSEHOLD) All Respondents (N=326) Respondents with Children (N=60) [] Seven to Twelve Months Six Months or Less Respondents without Children (N=266) Intercept Survey Findings (cont'd.) The intercept survey inquired about residents' patterns of attendance at performing arts events, visual arts exhibits, and community fairs and festivals... 90% 80% ~ 70% - 60% -- 50% ---- 40% 30% -- 2(P/0 -- 10% -- 0% FREQUENCY OF LIVE PERFORMING ARTS ATTENDANCE (PAST YEAR) (ALL RESPONDENTS, N=354) :-; i Collier County Lee County Other West Coast Florida Elsewhere in Florida [] Ten or more [] Five to Nine [] One to Four [] None Intercept Survey Findings (cont'd.) 5A FREQUENCY OF LIVE PERFORMING ARTS ATTENDANCE {PAST YEAR) (RESIDENTS 7 TO 12 MONTHS, N=251) 100% 50% ~ 30% Collier County Lee County OtherWest Coast Flodda Elsewhere in Flodda BTen or more Five to Nine One to Four DNone Year-round residents are more likely to be frequent attenders FREQUENCY OF LIVE PERFORMING ARTS ATTENDANCE (PAST YEAR) '{RESIDENTS 6 MONTHS OR LESS, N=75) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% Collier County Lee County Other West Coast Florida Elsewhere in Florida [] Ten or more E~ Five to Nine =a One to Four [] None Intercept Survey Findings (cont'd.) FREQUENCY OF LIVE PERFORMING ARTS ATTENDANCE (PAST YEAR) (RESPONDENTS WITH CHILDREN AT HOME, N=66) lO0% 70% 60% 40% 30% 20% i :.28i8% i :. 10% -- 0% Collier County Lee County Other West Coast Florida ~:i :i!i i~: : --- : F_.l~h~m in Florida Ten or more Five to Nine One to Four None Respondents without children are more likely to be frequent attenders FREQUENCY OF LIVE PERFORMING ARTS ATTENDANCE (PAST YEAR) (RESPONDENTS WITHOUT CHILDREN AT HOME, N=288) 100% 90% 80% 70% 40% 30% -- ~/~ Lee County Other West Coast Rorida a Ten or more [] Five to Nine mOnetoFour [] None Bsewhe~e in Flodda Intercept Survey Findings (cont'd.) As with performing arts attendance, respondents are most likely to attend in Collier County. Year- round residents and respondents without children are more likely to be frequent attenders 10 O% FREQUENCY OF VISUAL ARTS ATTENDANCE (PAST YEAR) · (ALL RESPONDENTS, N=354) 8O% 70% 60% ~% ~% 3O% 10% O% Collier County Lee County Other West Coast Florida Elsewhere in Florida BT eh or mo~ [] Fiveto Nine []Oneto Four [] None Intercept Survey Findings (cont'd.) .~ ~ When it comes to attending community festival and events, patterns are similar to performing and visual arts except that families with children are more likely to attend (88% attended at least once in past year compared to 75% of those without kids) 0O0/, 9O% FREQUENCY OF COMMUNITY FESTIVAL/EVENT ATTENDANCE (PAST YEAR) {ALL RESPONDENTS, N=354) 80% 70% 6O% 50% 4O0/o 30°1o 20*/0 10°/. 0% - : 83.3% 2Z9% - Collier County Anywhere Else Ten or more Fiveto Nine One to Four None Intercept Survey Findings (cont'd.) While lack of time and cost of attending are the most frequently cited reasons for not attending more frequently, lack of information and lack of nearby venues (combined with "Too' Far to Drive") are important barriers for many respondents 30.0% t200% I 0 0% Lack of Tim · WHY DON'T YOU ATTEND THE ARTS MORE FREQUENTLY (BY COLLIER COUNTY RESIDENCE STATUS) -- ~ All Respondents (N=313) a Reside 6 months or less per year (N=67) 1..,~__44:2% [] Reside 7 to 12 months per year (N=226} -- ~ -23~.9~.'9~.~/~ .... 2~.~/~- ............ ~-~.3o~ Cost of Lack of Not Interested Too Far to No one to Parking Lack of Venues Other Can't Find Attending Information in Type of Drive Attend WHh /Access in Collier Babysitters Programe Problems County Available WHY DON'T YOU ATTEND THE ARTS MORE FREQUENTLY (BY CHILDREN UNDER 16 IN HOUSEHOLD) ?0.0% I 59.9% 60.0% 140.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Lack of Time 4Z.~% 37.7o~ [] Respondents ~ith Children (N~I) ~ 29 5% ~ ' .~, · a Respondents ~ithout Children (N=252) --- -- ~1t~3°~ ' ',- ~ 4%19'°% 14 8% ~ ~ ~ .... 14 .... ~ 111% : ---~-~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ ~~ ' ~ ~.z~ 6.7% Co~ of La~ of Too Far to No one to Not Interested Parking Can't Find Lack of Venua~ ~h~ Attending Information Drive Attend With in Type of /A~ess Babysiflars i. Collier Programs Probit. Cou.~ Available Intercept Survey Findings, (cont'd.) We also tested different ways to develop new audiences... INTEREST VARIOUS ACTIVITIES (10 = MOST INTERESTING, 1 = LEAST INTERESTING) (BY SURVEY ADMINISTRATION POINT) 8.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 --a--Ail Respondents (N=288) -_ Reside 6 months or less per year (N=91) ~Reside 7 to 12 months per year (N=73) · -~l~-Respondents with Children (N=54) --~--Respondents without Children (N=234) ~L6'52 ~ ..~.32 A "sampler" ticket package Apackage AWeb site Recommended Walking tours (tickets and listing cultural %,isitor of arts, cultural, dinner at a local programs and itineraries" for and historic restaurant) events cultural day sites trips Recommended Recommended An artist studio "visitor "visitor tour with the itineraries" for itineraries" for opportunity to day trips day trips buy art directly combining combining from artists "culin a~J" outdoor activities with activities with cultural cultural . programs programs Intercept Survey Findings (cont'd.) P, eside 7 to 12 months per year (N=207) Reside 6 months or less per year (N=57) All Respondents (N=286) [] Ye~ SHOULD LOCAL GOVERNMENTS PROVIDE FUNDING FOR ARTS AND CULTURE? {BY COLLIER COUNTY RESIDENCE STATUS) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% m No Respondents are overwhelmingly in favor of government funding for arts and culture SHOULD COUNTY GOVERNMENTS PROVIDE FUNDING FOR ARTS AND CULTURE? (BY COLLIER COUNTY RESIDENCE STATUS) Reside 7 to 12 months per year (N=206) Reside 6 months or less per year (N=56) All Respondents (N=286) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% / [] Yes Intercept Survey Findings (cont'd.) Respondents are most supportive of arts and cultural funding for youth and senior programs, art in public places, festivals and events, and restoration of historic sites RECOMMENDATIONS FOR/~REAS OF ARTS FUNDING (BY COLLIER COUNTY RESIDENCE STATUS) Other New Exhibition Venues Lectu res/Semi n ar s New Thaetre~ Multicultural Programs Downtown Cultural Districts Arts Education Restored Historic Sites Seni or Program s FeslivalslEvents Art in Public Places Youth Programs 0.0% [] All Respondents (N=299) 37.1 __132.6% [] 31.1% ~ 42.3% ~.8% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 46.0% 50.0% · Reside 6 months or less per year (N=61) [] Reside 7 to 12 months per year {N=215) 6o.o*~ Intercept Survey Findings (cont'd.) NewspaPers and "word-of-mouth" are the most commonly-cited sources for information about arts and cultural events Other Internet I E-mail Through Schools Recreation Guide Posters Arts Groups Mailings Community Newsletters Magazine Brochures in the Mail Television Radio Station FamilyIFriends SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON ARTS AND CULTURAL EVENTS (BY COLLIER COUNTY RESIDENCE STATUS} Newspaper 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% [] Ail Respondents (N=$28) · Reside 6 months or less per year (N=69) I"] Reside 7 to 12 months per year (N=255) 100.0'/ Intercept Survey Findings (cont'd.) A Many respondents are interested in receiving more information via direct mail, via e-mail, and over the Internet PREFERRED SOURC ES OF INFORMATION ON ARTS AND CULTURAL EVENTS (BY COLLIER COUNTY RESIDENCE STATUS) Through Schools FamilyfFriends Arts Grpup Mailings Posters Recreation Guide Radio Community Newsletters Television Internst I E-m ail Direct Mail Brochure Newspaper 0.0% [] 0.8% [] 0.5% -I 0.8% J 0.5% I 1.5% aa 1.1% 1,2.4% I 1.5% [] 1.1% .... 15.0% '""~'3 18% ~ 33 8% ~'~-/' 3~ ,0% ~ I I ~ I [ 3B.3 ~ I I I .... I I I i 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% · All Respondents (N=188) · Reside 6 months or less per year (N=41) [] Reside 7 to 12 months per year (N=133) 50,0% United Arts Council of Collier County "Cultural Collier" Intercept Survey TOPLINE REPORT Collier County Cultural Plan Intercept Survey - TOPLINE REPORT (N=354) Intercept Survey-Tepllne Report For how long have you been a resident of Collier County? ............................ 11.33 Years How many months out of the year do you "reside" in Collier County? Six Months or Less ....................................................... 23.0% Seven to Twelve Months ....................................................... 77.0% How many times in the past year did you attend a live performing arts event (such as music, drama, dance) other than a school event: MEAN in Collier County ................................................................................................... 6.47 in Lee County ........................................................................................................ 2.36 elsewhere on the West Coast of Florida (e.g., Sarasota, Tampa) .....................................1.96 elsewhere in Florida ............................................................................................... 2.02 How many times in the past year did you attend an exhibition of visual art: MEAN in Collier County .................................................................................................... 4.23 in Lee County ........................................................................................................ 2.86 elsewhere on the West Coast of Florida (e.g., Sarasota, Tampa) ..................................... 1.65 elsewhere in Florida ........................................................................................... 2.06 How many times in the past year did you attend a community festival or event? MEAN in Collier County .................................................................................................. 3.15 anywhere else ....................................................................................................... 2.49 Please indicate which of the following you are "aware of," and/or have ever attended, or have "recently" attended (within the past 12 months): Aware Of Ever Attended Attended Recently Actors Repertory Theatre .................................... 31.6% .................. 8.5% ....................... 6.2% Art League of Marco Island ................................. 31.4% .................. 10.5% ....................... 2.8% Cambier Park Band Shell ................................... 26.8% .................. 24.3% ..................... 24.0% Classic Chamber Concerts ................................. 31.1% .................. 10.2% ............. ~ ......... 8.2% Collier County Mus.eum ...................................... 30.8% .................. 26.6% .....= ............... 14.7% Marco Island Film Festival .................................. 50.0% ................... 3.7% ....................... 2.3% Marco Island Players .......................................... 36.4% ................... 3.7% ....................... 2.0% Museum of the Everglades ................................. 28.8% .................. 16.9% ..................... 11.3% Naples Botanical Garden .................................... 40.4% .................. 14.1% ..................... 10.5% Naples Museum of Art ........................................ 24.3% .................. 18.1% ..................... 22.0% Naples Dinner Theatre ........................................ 34.2% .................. 18.6% ..................... 29.4% Outdoor Art Festival ........................................... 14.1% .................. 18.4% ..................... 35.6% Pelican Players ................................................... 26.6% ................... 6~2%---~ ................... 3.7% Philharmonic Center for the Arts ......................... 20.3% .................. 23.7% ..................... 38.1% Roberts Ranch .................................................... 33.1% ................... 6.2% ....................... 4.8% Sugden Theatre (Naples Players) ....................... 29.7% .................. 18.1% ..................... 24.3% Teddy Bear Museum .......................................... 42.9% .................. 2t .2% ....................... 6.8% The von Liebig Art Center (Naples Art Ass'n) ...... 22.0% .................. 19.8% ..................... 18.1% AMS Planning 5 RGSOBrCll ,.u,m. ,,uu,,L~ ,.,.,~u, a, r,-. intercept Survey-Topline Report 7. Where did you last attend a visual or performing arts event or historic site? [Record Verbatim] [LIMIT TO FIRST THREE RESPONSES] ............... See Attached Where would you take visitors for a "cultural experience" in Collier County? [Record Verbatim] [LIMIT TO FIRST THREE RESPONSES] ............... See Attached 9. What are some reasons that you don't attend arts events more frequently? (check all that apply) Lack of Time ................................................................... 58.5% Cost of Attending ............................................................. 41.9% Lack of Information ........................................................... 24.3% Too Far to Drive .............................................................. 16.9% No one to Attend With ....................................................... 13.4% Not Interested in Type of Programs Available ........................ 18.5% Parking/Access Problems ................................................... 9.6% Can't Find Babysitters ......................................................... 3.2% Lack of Venues in Collier County ........................................... 7.0% Other ............................................................................. 5.1% 10. Which of the following types of programs would you be most interested in seeing more of in Collier County? (check as many that apply) Classical Music ................................................................ 32.3% Popular Music ................................................................. 39.4% Folk or Jazz Music ................................. : ......................... 30.2% Stage Plays .................................................................... 44.0% Art Exhibitions ............................................................... 31.4% Art in Public Places ......................................................... 33.5% Historic Sites ................................................................... 27.7% Festivals ....................................................................... 37.2% Ballet ........................................................................... 20.6% Other Dance .............~ ..................................................... 17.8% Neighborhood Arts Programs .............................................. 17.2% Musical Theater ............................................................... 34.8% Arts/Crafts Fairs ............................................................... 32.0% Historical Programs .......................................................... 25,2% Arts/Crafts Classes ........................................................... 22.8% Lectures ......................................................................... 23.4% Children's Theatre ............................................................ 16.9% Children's Museum ........................................................... 12.6% Walking Tours ................................................................. 31.1% History Museum/Exhibits ................................................... 20.9% Family/Children's Programs ............................................... 16.0% Poetry/Novel Readings ........................................................ 8.9% Film Series .................................................................... 25.2% Other ............................................................................... 5.2% PleflfllflO G lIOSOAl'Uil bumm bUUIIL! bUlLUrd! rla,, Intercept Survey-Toplifle Report Which of the following activities compete for your spare time? (check as many that apply) ;~" ' ,~1 Movies ..................... 42.6% Reading ......................... 57.4% Exercise .................. 4~-'~/o~ Time with Family ........ 55.4% Attending Sports Events .... 13.4% Shopping ................. 33.0% Participating in Sports- 22.9% Home Improvement .......... 30.1% Television/Videos ......32.1% Outdoor Activities .......36.9% Gardening ...................... 24.7% Travel ..................... 44.3% Visiting Historic Sites .... 8.9% Arts/Crafts ...................... 20.2% Volunteer Work .........39.6% School Activities ........16.4% Entertaining at Home ........ 37.2% Other ........................ 9.8% 12. Which of the types of arts classes do you think you or any members of your family might be interested in taking (check as many that apply) Painting/Drawing ........ 52,8% Other Visual Art .............. 4.2% Photography ..............41.5% Printmaking ................... 7.5% Ballet/Other Dance ..... 10.2% Drama/Acting ............... 14.7% Art Appreciation .........27.9% Music Appreciation ........29.4% Film/Video Production- 11.7% Local History/Heritage ....24.2% Ceramics ............... 32.8% Sculpture ............... 15,1% Creative Writing ......17.4% Theater Appreciation 18.1% Other ...................... 7.5% 13. On a scale of 1 to 10, with I meaning "not interested" and 10 meaning "very interested," how interested might you be in each of the following packages or promotions if they were available in Collier County? (please write in number 1 through fO) MEAN A. A package including theatedconcert tickets and dinner at a local restaurant ........................ 6.53 B. Recommended "visitor itineraries" for cultural day trips throughout Collier County ................ 6.09 C. Recommended "visitor itineraries" for day trips combining outdoor activities (e.g., Lake Trafford) with cultural programs ...................................................... 5.79 D. Recommended "visitor itineraries" for day trips combining "culinary" activities (e.g., visiting regional farmer's markets, wine tasting, etc.) with cultural programs ................ 5.97 E. A "sampler" ticket package featuring admissions to different venues in the County ............... 6.58 F. Visiting a Web site listing cultural programs and events throughout Collier County ............... 6.31 G. Taking an artist studio tour with the opportunity to buy art directly from adists ..................... 5.39 H. Walking tours of arts, cultural, and historic sites in the County-7 ........................................ 6.03 14. Do you think that local governments should assist in providing fundinq for arts and culture? Yes ................................................... 67.7% No .................................................... 19.5% Don't Know ......................................... 12.8% 15. Do you think county government should assist in providing fundinq for arts and culture? Yes ................................................... 69.0% No .................................................... 18.7% Don't Know ......................................... 12.3% 16. If you could recommend how local and county governments should support non-profit arts, organizations, which of the following areas would you like to see receive more funding: (check as many that apply) Art in Public Places ........44.5% New Theatres ............... 24.4% Youth Programs ............ 52.2% Multicultural Programs ..... 25.1% Arts Education ....... 31.1% Lectures/Seminars-- 20.7% Senior Programs .... 39.8% Festivals/Events .....43.8% New Exhibition Venues ....... 14.7% Restored Historic Sites ....... 38.8% Downtown Cultural Districts-26.8% Other ............................... 4.0% AM5 Planfllntj t, flusual'lm IntorDopt Sorvey-Topllne Report 17. Would you be open to considering a small sales tax increase to support arts, cultural, and historic programs and facilities in Collier County? Yes ................................................... 35.1% No .................................................... 46.8% Don't Know ......................................... 18.2% 18. Would you be open to considering a small property tax increase to support arts, cultural, and historic programs and facilities in Collier County? Yes ................................................... 25.3% No .................................................... 57.7% Don't Know ......................................... 17.0% 19. Where do you get most of your information on arts and cultural events? (check as many that apply and p/ease specify which newspapers, radio or television stations, if appropriate) Newspaper ................................................ 89.3%. Magazine ................................................. 20.7% Radio Station ............................................. 35.7% Television ................................................. 34.1% Family/Friends ........................................... 50.0% Through Schools ........................................ 10.4% Recreation Guide ........................................ 12.8% Posters ..................................................... 14.9% Internet/Email .............................................. 9.8% Arts Groups Mailings ................................... 17.7% Community Newsletters ............................... 19.5% Brochures in the Mail ................................... 25.0% Other ......................................................... 1.2% 20. How would you most like to receive information on cultural events? Newspaper .............................................. 37.2% Radio ........................................................ 3.2% Television ................................................... 3.7% Family/Friends ............................................. 0.5% Through Schools .......................................... 0.5% Recreation Guide .......................................... 1.1% Posters ....................................................... 1.1% Internet/Email ............................................ 13.8% Arts Groups Mailings ..................................... 1.1% Community Newsletters ................... ; ............ 3.7% Brochures in the Mail ................................... 34.0% 22. How many people in your household under 23. What is your age? age 167 (MEAN SCORE) ......................... 1.88 Under 19 ............................................... 1.7% 19 to 24 ................................................ 2.3% 25 to 34 ................................................ 5.9% 35 to 44 .............................................. 12.1% 45 to 54 .............................................. 17.5% 55 to 64 .............................................. 23.7% 65 to 74 .............................................. 20.1% 75 or Over- ............................................ 8.8% /~Mb l'lilllllflllJ b IfltBroBpt SUKVey-ToplInB RBpor! DK/Refused ........................................... 7.9% ~ ~, United Arts Council of Collier County "Cultural Collier" County Comparisons The Sarasota CoUnty Arts Council Contact: Patricia Caswell, Executive Director 329,581 146,928 16.3% $541,000 501(c)3 7 FTE $224,000 $o.68 Local arts agency structure The Sarasota County Arts Council is a 501(c)3 non-profit arts organization whose mission is "to create an environment where the arts flourish" in Sarasota County. The Council accomplishes this mission through advocacy, promotion, coordination, education, and access. Number and composition of cultural grouos The SCAC officially represents just fewer than 100 area arts organizations .(individual artists do not hold membership status). Roughly a quarter of these organizations have moderate to large budget sizes. Community demographics and lifestyles Sarasota County contains roughly 70,000 more residents than Collier County, and subsequently has about 40,000 more households. Sarasota is generally poorer (half the number of the households in Sarasota make over $100,000 annually compared to Naples) and has an older population than the Naples area (nearly 40% of the residents of Sarasota are over 60). Likewise,. Sarasota, like Naples, has a large seasonal population. Funding sources and amounts The largest sum of money the SCAC receives annually is from the Sarasota County government in an annual operating grant of $174,000, which the Council directly uses to support program services they offer. Additionally, the Council received $48,000 grant from the State of Florida for ongoing arts-in-education programs. The SCAC annually receives $236,000 from corporations and .individuals in the Sarasota area. About half o£the SCAC's annual revenues are from contributions. Cooperative programs The SCAC produces a number of cooperative programs geared toward the arts community in general. It hosts SmARTalk luncheon program that unties leaders of arts organizations and individual artists through a current-events forum The Arts Council joined with other area organizations to create The Hermitage, an evolving artists' retreat on Manasota Key. Finally, the Council hosts the Cultural Executives Committee which serves to promote communication among the local arts groups, as well as address issues of relevance to the arts and advise on SCAC policy. Political~ structural, and organizational factors The Arts Council strives to take a leading role in being an advocate for the arts in Sarasota by being a liaison between the organizations and the government. Seven full-time staff members staff the SCAC. Marketing and outreach activities The Council maintains the Sarasota County Cultural Calendar, which lists all of the arts group's performances, as Well as publish a quarterly pocket guide to the arts that is distributed statewide. Furthermore, the SCAC produces Arts Day - an annual festival of the arts which showcases over 1000 performing and visual artists. The Council also produces a quarterly newsletter which is distributed countywide. Cultural Council of Santa Cruz County Contact: 7960 Soquel Drive, Suite I Aptos, CA 95003 (831) 688-5399 257,572 92,765 54.4% $1,62S,000 501(c)3 27 $310,000 $1.20 Local arts agency structure The Cultural Council of Santa Cruz County is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization serving as the main arts service organization for all arts groups based in Santa Cruz county, California. Number and composition of cultural ffrour~s The CCSCC lists well over 300 arts groups and individual artists who have been served by the Councils programs. One unique aspect of the Cultural Council is the presence of the Council Associates program; a program designed to give members of the Council a greater say in CCSCC governance. Representatives of the Associates serve on the Board as well as having a say in initiating Council projects and actions, and ultimately approve selection of the Council's executive director and grants committee members. 62 area artists and arts organizations have a membership to the Council Associates program. The CCSCC awarded over $230,000 in their various grant programs. Comlnunitv demographics and lifestyles Santa Cruz C.ounty contains nearly identical total population numbers (257,500) however the California county has a greater mix of ethnicities than does Collier County. Santa Cruz is a much younger county, containing nearly half of the over 60 population that Collier County does. However, wealth ratings are very similar, with both counties containing a quarter of the households with over $100,000 in income. Funding sources and amounts The largest source of contributed income that the CCSCC received is from the California Arts Council. In FY2001, the CCSCC received $185,000 of the total :$310,000 in unearned income. The CCSCC received the funding from four different grant programs: the State-Local Partnership Program, the Local Arts Education Partnership Program, the Artists in Residence in Schools and the Arts Partnerships for Education program. Unlike most of the arts councils studied, the CCSCC received the majority of its unearned income from private sources (over $700,000). Political, structural~ and organizational factors The establishment of the Council Associates program alleviates some of the competitive feelings of the area arts groups and provides an equal voice for all of the major organizations. Marketing and outreach activities The CCSCC maintains an online calendar of events on their website that any Santa Cruz county artist or arts organization can use. Furthermore, the Council maintains a very in-depth artists residency prograrn affiliated with the public and private schools of the County. Major challenges and initiatives The CCSCC has recently undergone a leadership change, with a new Executive Director taking the helm, a large turnover in Board membership, four new staff members, and a Cultural Action Plan that was recently put into place. Benchmarks for community "indicators" (e.g.~ wellness, sustainability~ etc.)" The Cultural Action Plan was developed along with a Strategic Plan in order to give the Council direction during the transition years and a plan for the future. Scottsdale Cultural Council Contact: Frank Jacobson, President & CEO 207,524 93,135 66.7% $10,160,000 501(c)3 77 FT $2,741,000 $13.21 Local arts agency structure The mission of the Cultural Council is "to create a climate wherein the arts may flourish through the active participation and cooperation of government, business, education and the private sector; to provide opportunities for the citizens of Scottsdale and the surrounding region to experience quality arts, cultural and educational activities; and demonstrate how the arts and our cultural heritage are integral to the vitality of our community and its citizens." The Scottsdale Cultural Council is unique among the arts councils studied in that it also manages the Scottsdale Museum of Contemporary Arts, the Scottsdale Center for the Arts, and the Scottsdale Public Art Program. The Council is incorporated as a 501(c)3 non-profit organization. Number and composition of cultural groups The SCC does not maintain 'membership' status for the groups it serves. An estimate of the number of groups in the Scottsdale area served by the SCC is around 250. Community demographics and lifestyles Scottsdale is located in Maricopa County, Arizona and adjacent to Phoenix, making the county population much larger than the other areas studied. However, when taken individually, the city itself contains a population very similar to the other locations. Scottsdale contains very little diversity (only 6.5% of the population is non-white) and has wealth levels similar to Santa Cruz. It also contains the highest level of residents with at least a Bachelor's degree. Funding sources and amounts 5~ The major source of governmental subsidies that the Scottsdale Cultural Council receives is from the city of Scottsdale in the form of an annual operating grant of $2.3 million, which is earmarked mainly for the operation of the facilities the SCC manages. The State of Arizona awarded the SCC a total $136,000 in grants, mainly in support of the arts-in-education program. Public support of the SCC totals just under $4 million. Cooperative programs There are no significant programs that incorporate the majority of the arts organizations of Scottsdale. Political~ structural~ and organizational factors The Scottsdale Cultural Council has an extremely large staff, with 77 full-time staff members. The staff is divided into divisions, which organized by program. The Marketing and Development departments centrally serve all four major programs - there is no delineation between the organizations. Marketing and outreach activities The largest outreach activity the Council participates in is the arts-in-education program, which annually serves nearly 50,000 students in Maricopa County. Major challenges and initiatives Due to the downturn in the economy, the SCC has decided to suspend some programs in order to remain fiscally responsibie. Among the cuts are a 10% reduction in staff (the elimination of 8 positions), the elimination of salary increases for the remaining staff, the contraction of many education programs and the elimination of the Community Arts Grants Program. The Council hopes to reestablish the Grants Program when the economy recovers. The cuts were mainly a reaction by very bad ticket sales at the Center and admissions at the Museum and reductions in the City's support. Benchmarks for community "indicators" (e.g. weliness~ sustainability~ etc.)" The Council just completed a 5-year Cultural Master Plan that will take the organization into the future. Horry Cultural Arts Council Contact: 303 Main Street Conway, SC 29526 (843) 248-7200 Horry C. utt. ura{ Arts Co,unci'[ 200,741 82,391 10.2% $779,000 501(c)3 3 FT $379,000 $1.89 Local arts agency structure The Horry Cultural Arts Council (HCAC) is an umbrella organization that provides assistance, support, resource information, and funding to individuals and organizations involved with the cultural, performing and visual arts in Horry County. Number and composition of cultural groups The HCAC currently serves around 180 arts organizations and individual artists in the county. Excluding those individual artists, there are just over 40 artistic organizations in Horry County the Council is affiliated with. A large majority of these groups (around 80%) can be considered -grassroots (their annual budgets in FY2001 were under $25,000). Community demographics and lifestyles Horry County composes the largest county in terms of total land area in South Carolina, being comprised of 1,134 square miles. The largest city in the county is Myrtle Beach, with a large fluctuation of seasonal residents, and a fast-growing destination of retirees over the age of 65 (the county has seen an increase of 69% between 1990 and 2000). Funding sources and amounts 5 HCAC received $379,000 in governmental based support in FY2001. The largest portion of that support ($261,000) came from the City of Myrtle Beach, earmarked especially for regranting. Additionally, $43,000 was received from the South Carolina Arts Commission for HCAC's arts- in-education program. The Council also receives $40,000 in Admissions Tax from the city (admission tax is levied on all recreational activities - mainly golf). Cooperative programs HCAC maintains a cultural calendar on their website in which any artist or organization can post their events, as well a listing of all area arts organizations/individuals in the county. Political, structural~ and organizational factors The HCAC is a very small organization with only three full-time staff members (an Executive Director, an arts-in-education Director, and an administrative assistant). Marketing and outreach activities The largest outreach activity that the Council participates in is the Arts Education Initiative (AEI) involving 39 weeks of artist residencies in 22 county schools. The program is very successful and was started in conjunction with the South Carolina Arts Commission funding (and currently receives the highest amount of any recipient in the state). Benchmarks for community "indicators" (e.g., wellness, sustainability, etc.)" There are no community indicators in place. They do maintain the wellness of their Arts Education pro.ams by monitoring the penetration in the schools and the number of students served. Asheville Area Arts Council Contact: Steve Steinert, Executive Director P.O. Box 507 Asheville, NC 28802 (828) 298-0710 209,097 85,121 10.1% $320,000 501(c)3 3 FT $81,500 $0.39 Local arts agency structure The role of the AAAC is to act as a uniting force and umbrella organization for the artistic organizations of the Asheville area and the rest of Buncombe County. The AAAC is not a presenter, nor is it a membership organization. It functions mainly as a granting and service organization. Number and composition of cultural groups The AAAC is not a membership organization; it serves all arts organizations located within the county boundaries. Currently the number of organizations with artistic mission in Buncombe County is around 80. Community demographics and lifestyles The Asheviile area (Buncombe County) contains roughly 1/5th fewer people than Collier County (200,000 vs. 250,000). Asheville contains a higher proportion of population aged 18-24 and fewer people over the age of 60, undoubtedly due to the presence of the University of North Carolina-Asheville. As a consequence, but not necessarily due to the University's presence, Executive Director Steve Steinert reports that the Asheville area contains many 'new age' arts companies, more so than in an 'average' town the size of Asheville. Steve described the Asheville area as 'the Santa Fe or Sedona of the East Coast.' Steve reported that the vast majority of arts offerings are avant-garde in nature (for example, many performance artists), and programming does no skew toward traditional fare. Funding sources and amounts 5~ In FY 2001, AAAC received $32,000 in grants from the city government and around $22,500 from the county.government. In addition, Steve reported that the state of North Carolina grants money annually by county based on population levels. Reported by the North Carolina Arts Council, the AAAC received approximately $35,000 in FY 99 for their internal programs (more is allocated earmarked as regranting funds). Contrastingly, AAAC barely receives any individual contributions, and even less corporate funding. According to their FY2000 Form 990, the AAAC received about 94% of their revenues from contributed sources, due to the fact that they do not present any major productions. Cooperative programs Other than the shared cultural calendar, the groups represented by the Arts Council do not participate in any cooperative programs. The Arts Council co-produces First Night Asheville with the City as well as serving on the Public Art and Urban Trail Committees. Political~ structural~ and organizational factors Steve mentioned that the climate of Buncombe County is not particularly political in nature, and personal agendas do not hinder arts growth. Marketing and outreach activities The AAAC unites the community through a cultural calendar listing all available events in Buncombe County. It also administers an Arts-in-Education plan that serves the children of the local city and county school system and provides inexpensive tickets to children through their Kids Tix program. Maior challenges and initiatives Since taking over the Executive Director position two years ago, Steve Steinert revealed that the biggest challenge he has faced (and is currently) is survival. The Arts Council was not financially healthy and he is in the process of reversing that trend. After a few years of financial sustainability, he plans then to look to the future of the organization and it's place in Buncombe County. Pinellas County Arts Council Contact: Judith Powers Jones, Executive Director P.O. Box 507 Asheville, NC 28802 (828) 258-07] 0 926,803 410,171 21.3% $1,4oo,ooo Indep. Special District of County 9 FT $1,165,000 $1.26 Local arts agency structure The Pinellas County Arts Council was created in 1976 by the Board of County Commissioners as a permanent outgrowth of the Pinellas Bicentennial Action '76 Committee. It is not set up as a county agency, but rather as an independent special district of the county government. Number and composition of cultural groups The number of individual artists and arts organization in Pinellas County number close to 300. Of this, approximately thirty can be considered major organizations. Community demographics and lifestyles Pinellas is very similar to the demographics of Hillsborough County. Pinellas County contains nearly four times as many residents as Collier County, with a similar retirement cross-section. However, Pinellas residents tend to be less wealthy and less educated. Funding sources and amounts The primary source of their contributed revenue comes from the County Commissioners office in the Pinellas County government, in the form of an annual operating grant of $800,000. Pinellas receives around $50,000 in annual arts license plate revenue and an additional $15,000 from the Department of Cultural Affairs for their local arts agency support grant. The St. Petersburg city government awards the Council with a support of around $350,000 that helps fund their arts-in- education programs. Cooperative programs The most significant cooperative program established by the Council is the Education Consortium. This group is comprised of education staff members from all of the major arts organizations with education programs who meet regularly to discuss opportunities and share information. Furthermore, most of the arts workshops and programs are duplicated by the Arts Council of Hillsborough County (and vice versa). Political, structural, and organizational factors The political factors influencing the Arts Council are not significant, considering that the 'major players' and funders of the arts in St. Petersburg usually are associated with the larger specific arts institutions. Further, the board of the Arts Council is assigned by the County Commissioners. Marketing and outreach activities The Council created a directory for artistic offerings and services in the Pinellas County area called ArtsLine. The main resource for disseminating performance listings of the arts organizations is handled 'quite well' by the St. Pete Times. Maior challenges and initiatives The biggest challenge mentioned by the Council is the identification of new resources (both individual and corporate) to move the member institutions beyond their current state of operations. Specifically for the Council, they would like to step up the grants program in order to cover the costs of institutional develop of the member organizations. One area the council mentioned they would like to explore would be some acquiring the bed tax money that is associated with tourism in the area to help support the grants program. Benchmarks for community "indicators" (e.g, wellness, sustainability, etc.)" The health and growth of the grants program is their major source of measuring how healthy their organization is. No other formal benchmarks are in place at this time. Brevard Cultural Alliance Contact: Kay Burke, Executive Director 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way, B-104 Viera, FL 32940 (321) 690-6817 482,073 198,718 21.8% $306,00O ~501(c)3 3 FT $155,000 Local arts agency structure The Brevard Cultural Alliance was established in 1975 as a non-profit 501(c)3 institution to develop, coordinate and promote the arts and culture in Brevard County. Number and composition of cultural groups The BCA officially has a membership of 30 major organizations in Brevard County, although it serves all groups located in the county. Community demographics and lifest3,1es Brevard County contains nearly twice as many residents as Collier County, however, both counties contain similar education levels. The major differences in the two counties vary mostly in wealth and age - Collier County's population is a bit older and Brevard County is less wealthy (only 7% of households earn over $99,000/year compared to 24% in Collier County). Funding sources and amounts The BCA received nearly $140,000 from government sources in FY 2001. it received a program grant from the State Department of Cultural Affairs for $15,000. The BCA is most heavily funded by the Brevard County Board of Commissioners, which gave it $110,000 for operating support. The BCA earns half of the total revenue dollars brought in per year. Cooperative programs The BCA maintains a cultural calendar (both printed and on the web) as well as a separate listing of all festival offered in Brevard County sponsored by the various arts organizations. Political, structural, and organizational factors The Brevard Cultural Alliance is a small operation, operating with a full-time staff of three. Marketing and outreach activities BCA offers an individual membership program offered to the general public. This program helps provide in-depth arts education programs for youth-at-risk at sites throughout the county as well as artist residencies in public elementary schools. Major challenges and initiatives Brevard County is experiencing tremendous growth (the population is projected to increase by ten percent in the next two years alone). In order to prepare for the future, the BCA underwent a strategic planning process that has culminated in the creation of the Brevard Cultural Plan. The Plan made recommendations for creating a year-round cultural presence, building a community of cultural organizations and public and private sector partners that collaborate and work effectively together to increase cultural funding, building a stronger cultural image for Brevard County;.and, using the cultural image to then influence and help shape Brevard's future growth and development. Benchmarks for community "indicators" (e.g, wellness~ sustainabilit¥~ etc.)" Benchmarks for community indicators most likely will be the achievement of the recommendations that resulted from the strategic planning process. No formal indicators were in place prior to the plan. Arts Council of Hillsborough County Contact: Arthur Keeble, Executive Director The Times Building 1000 N. Ashley, Suite 105 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 276-8250 1,011,483 400,029 30.5% $1,600,000 Special District of County 19 FT $1,268,000 $1.25 Local arts agency structure The Arts Council of Hillsborough County was established by the Florida State Legislature in 1967 as a public authority (it is now considered an 'Independent Special District' of the county government) to promote, coordinate, and develop the arts in Tampa. Since then, the mission of the Arts Council has expanded to include additionally "to contract for artistic services all for the enjoyment, education, cultural enrichment and benefit of the citizens ,of Hillsborough County." Number and composition of cultural groups It's estimated that the Council serves around 200 individual artists and arts organizations in Tampa. Around 34 of these organizations could be considered 'major.' Community demographics and lifestyles The City of Tampa and the remainder of Hillsborough County contain just over 1 million residents. Of the areas studied, Hillsborough County remains one of the most diverse, with a 23% non-white population. Tampa is a younger town that the rest of the Florida areas studied with only 17% of its total population being over the age of 60. Hillsborough and Collier Counties both share similar education levels, with just over one-fifth of the population having at least a bachelor's degree. Funding sources and amounts 5 ~ The Arts Council receives the bulk of its contributed revenue from the Hillsborough County government in the form of an annual operating grant of $1.1 million. The ACHC receives an operating grant specifically earmarked for support of the Tampa Theater of $153,000. There is also a minor operating grant from the State of Florida in the amount of around $15,000 that supports the arts-in-education initiatives of the Council. The Council receives the remainder of its unearned income from business and does not rely on the support of individual donors. Cooperative pro,rams The Arts Council has initiated a cooperative marketing initiative, which distributes event listings to local and regional tourist destinations that promote the area as a major cultural destination. About 20,000 pieces are distributed each year. Political, structural, and organizational factors The Arts Council is unique, in that it also manages a theater. Currently there are 10 full-time staff members dedicated to Council programs, and an additional 9 full-time staff members who manage the Tampa Theater and its programs. Marketing and outreach activities The Council maintains a 24-hour ~Artsline' where patrons can call to find out more information on cultural events. The Council also publishes FYI, a newsletter for artists, and Arts Organization Directory, an Artists Directory, and a 'Venue Menu'. For audiences, the Council organizes a ticket subsidy program to give social service clients on a limited income the chance to attend cultural events. Maior challenges and initiatives The biggest challenge facing the Arts Council is their attempt to spin-off the operation of the Tampa Theater into a separate 501(c)3 organization. If successful, this should create more of a separation between the theater and the arts council in order for the council to tap into the donor base that the theater currently enjoys. Benchmarks for community "indicators" {e.p.~ wellness~ sustainability~ etc0" The most common benchmark that Council uses is the growth' of the budget. If the budget increases than it was considered a successful year. United Arts Council of Collier County "Cultural Collier" Collier Master Matrix ° ~ o ~-~°°~o ~-°°o 6. A. PUBLIC PETITION 11/19/02 1) Violations, Chapter 119, FL Statu. tcs re: costs ~sociated with the duplicauon of videotaves - co~cted 11/15/02 . 2) Violation, FL Sunshine (Open Meetings) Law, section 286.011 reqmremen that all meetings be open to the public unless there is a specific statutory exemption- orientation of Commissioner Halas Respect~lly, Jim Kramer 239.450.2771 remarKRJ(~l.com RE: Pubic R~ord~ Law~O&~On of County Co ~_mmi~ion Meeti~S Videos ~. ~, ~S i~ ~ ~ Y~ ~ ~ ~l~on of ~ offi~ of~ C~ ~ ~~ ~~t ~ ~ to ~ by ~n~ ~f~ ~ ~ m~~ ~ ~- I ~ ~ ~ d~om ~th ~ M~ ~b~c ~~ D~or, ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ di~ ~d~ to ~S ~ ~s ~ time d~ m a ~ ~ ~~ ~~to ~~ ~ of~~~l~ o~ (1) ~ ~ m~, (~ ~ ~r ~ to ~ ~s proj~ ~ ~ ~e ~e ~ ~i~ m ~ ~e~ w~ ~ ~ ~ (1) ~). I ~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~ 8~ ~ is ~ ~ ~~ of ~ ~lic ~s ~ ~s m ~e ~m a~e ~ i~n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ in ~ch ~ ~ k~ (~ f~). By ~py of~ ~ I m ~~ ~t ~. M~ ~~ly Sincerely, Rsmim IVlsmflich Chief Assi~nt County Attorney !To: mW)Kttothe~L,nw. IwMthem. 0n~16, IWmimv#ldk)theoM~inlion,MMxl,'...ehoMdyoubeeleoted The only Idiue you oen hang your hlt il on pege 3. prmm~t m tmOd ~o that u~lm~ M a .tntute ena~;ed for the p.l~ bendlt, the Sunshine Law ttmuld be ttbM~ ~m~:l ~ ;~ve e~K~ ~) ~ public pUrpm4, while ~.~xid be a.noMy ~melmed (~). (IN~i~ from I:)at GlemK~ Ofthe FLAmxney GeneM'~ Mflce). Mu~we go that Itt, or canwe ~ometo ~)rne dim Kmm~, former c~,dgm, County ~ 239.4.50.2771 remmKRJ~m~.com p.L quote - "We rm~ ~ to dw~mg ~, ~ ~ ~ m u~~ ~" - Jimmy Ca,.l~ Fimt Amendment Fo~ Page 1 of I ! i.S bj ............... il:)l~: 11/11.2002 6:22.'02 AM Eastern 8tlmderd Time iFrom: RemMkRJ It wac my Ideim.l lam Thumdey to il)end 4 houm with Jim DMM~ dufktg a~ ~ lelilon wtth the new oommMow, FnlnkHMIL OurtowMN~du~/glvelnWo~the~ I~11 did ~ll~llt~n~lelndvlduMwl~nldto Jim Kramer, tom~e~ mm<Id.re. County ¢ommt~len 90'2 I:~y'~ Rock Neplel FL 34110 Wednesday, November 13, 2(X)2 America Online: RemarkR3 6 let'S roil! .,.for the iconoclastically inclined First AeC, ess State Pokey: Florida's Sunshinel that alt meetings of state :.agencies and local unless there is. a specific statutory e~Ption. Application: with~the- public agency, any ora at Timing PlaCement cO~tefi,t ~he me~ing. Exemptions: There is a or more members of the same there is a specific statutory exemPtion. Sanctions: An unintentional violation a fine of up to $500. term of up violation Orr be voided by the court. who record an open )hibited by a jail held in .....,.., ,...., ......... ,... n--~- ~.,~,^~ ¢'~.-.,.;.4... .'~,44 t~'1 9qcl A~¢~ 977t r~mRrkri(~acd.com COLLIER COUNTY DAVID C. WEIGEL ;AY: ,2'Jr:) .,'/ i (X,:'5 November 12,201/)2 Via Facsimile & U.S. Mail 1,643-7679) Mr. Jim Kramcr 992 Plymouth Rock Drive Naples, FL 34110 Re: Sunshine Law/County Manager Orientation for Commissioner-Elect DearMr Kramer: In accordance w~lh your reqt,est at our meeting on No~ember 8, 2002. I hereby ol'l~.r lhe felfo',a, mg explanation regarding my opinion that the aboYe-mentioned orientation is :lot sub ecl t,.) thc Sunshine Law ~lhe facts known to me are that the County Manager's Office hits :,chedt, lcd an orientalion session for tl~e Commissioner-Elect fi'om Districl 2. It is rny tmders~anding Ihat these sessions involve the Manager and his staff and the CommissJone~-Elect in order for bolh parties to get to know each other and to explain Counly organizalion and operations lo lhe Commiss:oner-Elect. (Attached are the Manager's letter and schedule regarding the orientation). You assert that said sessions are subject to the Sunshine La,,,,, because the Commissioner-Elect is a member of the public who has not yet been sworn init) office and, since the M,mager s meeting is with a member of the public, that means that other members of ,,.~*h~' ;7:i~;!.~c .'J-,,,t,,,~,~ al,~,o bc allowed It; I',¢ presenl. l'he Fh)rida Government in the Sunshine Law (Chapter 286, Florida Start,les) applies to elected and appointed public collegial bodies and to any gathering of two or more members of thc same board to discuss some matter which will foreseeably come before that board for action. Government in thc Sunshine Manual. 2002 Edition, at page I. See also City ~¢'Miami Beach Ber. x. 245 So. 2d 38 (Fllt. 1971 ) and AGO 73-223. Meetings of staff of boards or commissions covered by thc Sunshine Law are not ordinarily subject to Section 286.()11. Florida Statulcs. Occidental £?lwmical Company v. Mayo, 351 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 1977), l)ix~q~l~roved in ?art other,~,,rotmdx. Citiz. en.~ v. Beard, 613 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 1992); and AGO 89-39. More importantly, it has been held that where a mayor is not a member of the city council and docs not possess any power to vote even in the case of a tie vote but possesses only the power to veto legislation, then the mayor may meet privately with an individual member of the city council without violating the Sunshine La,,*,' (provided that the mayor is not acting as a liaison between members and neither the mayor nor the council member has been delegated the authority Io acl on behalf of the council). AGOs 90-26 and 85-36. 6 Mr..lira Kramer Page ' November 12, 2(')02 I am not aware of any facts indicating that any other commissioner will attend thc session or that the County Commission has delegated any authority to the Manager m regard to tile purpose and manner in which these sessions are conducted. It appears that the sessions arc merely designed to provide thc Commissioner~Elect with information about the County's organization and operations. I am not aware of any facts indicating that this orientation process is m any way intended to serve as a pseudo-advisory group to form recommendations for tile Coun!y Commission. I have not located any Attorney General opinions or case law indicating that the type of orientation session described above is subject to the Sunshine Law. Rather, I believe the orientation is analogous to a meeting between the County Manager and a Commissioner to discuss matters affecting the County. Such a meeting is not ordinarily subject to the Sunshine I;IW. You have asked me to refer to any "exemption" to support my opinion that the orientation is not subject to the Sunshine Law. As i mentioned in our meeting, the term cxcmptmn is used in regard to the Public Records Law. The analysis of this matter under the Sunshine Law (Open Meeting law) is whether thc statute or the applicable cases and General Attorney Opinions indicate that a given meeting has been determined to fall within the requirements of the Sunshine Law. I have not located any authority that indicates that this orientation, as described above, is subject to the Sunshine Law. You have indicated that you intend to ~'test" my opinion with the Office of the Attorney General. As 1 explained at our meeting, 1 welcome any review of this matter by authorities such as the Attorney General's office and I would appreciate knowing the result of that inquiry. Please contact me if you have additional questions or comments. Ramiro Mafialich Chief Assistant County Attorney RM/mw Attachments CC: James Mudd, County Manager David C. Wiegel, County Attorney REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC ItEARI/qGS ,erk to the Board: Please place the following as a: ~,~ ,-~ XXX Normal Legal Advertisement r'l Other: {"t~-'~ ~=~ (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dept/Div: Comm. Dev. Serv./Planniag Person: ~AOt ~ Date: ~' tt~'-O ~ Petition No. (If none, give brief description): VA-2001-AR-2015, Manatee Two Towers petitioner: (Name & Address): Austin White/Becket & poliakoff, P. A., 3003 Tamiami Trail North, Ste. 210, Naples, Florida 34103 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: Manatee Resort Condominium Association, etal, 9566 Gulfshore Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 Hearing before [] BCC . XXXX BZA [] Other Requested Hearing date: .'~/2002. Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News [] Other [] Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: VA-2002-AR-2015, Austin White, of Becket & Poliakoff, P.A., reprtsenting unit owners of the Manatee Resort Condominium Association, requesting relic~ in the RT zoning district from the 500 square foot maximum size for a hotel unit set forth ia LDC Section 2.2.8.4.7.2.1., to allow four (4) units of the total 19 as built units to have 3,200 square feet of floor area, (includes 550 square foot lanai) and to allow 15 units to have 2,625 square feet of floor area, (includes 543 sqgar, e foot lanai), for property located at 9566 Gulfshore Drive, further described as the north 50 feet of Lot 14 and all of Lots 15 & 16, Block B, Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit 1, as recorded ia Plat Book 3, Page 9, Collier County, Florida. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? XX Yes costs: 113-138312-649110 I~ivisi~n ~ { Date List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS [] No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising Approved by: County Manager Date For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLE~'SDate Received~O~CE ~SE ~NLY:Date of Public he~~ Date Adve~sed: ~ ~ /,/, RESOLUTION NO. 02- RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA-2002-AR-2015, FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected and lawfully constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a variance fi.om the required 500 square foot maximum size for a hotel unit set forth in LDC Section 2.2.8.4.7.2.1., to allow four (4) units of the total 19 as built units to have 2,650 square feet of floor area, and to allow 15 units to have 2,085 square feet of floor area, in the "RT" Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board has fully considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: Petition VA-2002-AR-2015, filed by Becker & Polliakoff, P.A., representing the Manatee Resort Condominium Association, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Lot 14, and all of Lots 15 and 16, Block B, Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit 1, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 9, of the Official Record Books of Collier County, Florida be and the same hereby is approved for a variance from the required 500 square foot maximum size for a hotel unit as set forth in LDC Section 2.2.8.4.7.2.1., to allow four (4) units of the total 19 as built units to have 2,650 square feet of floor area, and to allow 15 units to have 2,085 square feet of floor area, of the "RT" Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the Conditions attached as Exhibit A. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to VA-2002-AR-2015 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote. Petition Number Done this day of ,2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Patrick G. White Assistant County Attorney VA-2002-AR-2015~KD~lo Attachment: Exhibit A: Conditions Conditions for Manatee Resort Petition # VA-2002-AR-20! $ In the case of the destruction of the structure for any reason, to an extent equal to or greater than 50 percent of the actual replacement cost of the structure at the time of its destruction, any reconstruction shall conform to the provisions of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of reconstruction; and 2. On an annual basis beginning 30 days after this variance is approved, the ownership entity must provide to the county attorney's office and to Development Services staff the following items: a. An approved hotel/transient lodging license that specifically applies to and describes all units in Manatee Resort; and b. An affidavit from each owner that evidences the use of his or her respective unit as "hotel and transient lodging"; and c. Documentary evidence that demonstrates the payment of bed taxes by each individual unit owner. If appropriate, an affidavit from the affected unit owner that states that the unit has not been occupied within specific dates, therefore bed taxes were not due. 6/19/02 EXHIBIT A G:\Current\Deselem\Variances\Manatee--VA-2002-AR-2015\CondiUons for Manatee Resort.doc July 26, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: VA-2001-AR-2015 Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, August 25, 2002, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk P.O./Account # 113-138312-649110 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 10, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition VA-2001-AR-2015 Austin White, of Backer & Poliakoff, P.A., representing unit owners of the Manatee Resort Condominium Association, requesting relief in the RT zoning district from the 500 square foot maximum size for a hotel unit set forth in LDC Section 2.2.8.4.7.2.1, to allow four (4) units of the total 19 as built units to have 3,200 square feet of floor area, (includes 550 square foot lanai) and to allow 15 units to have 2,625 square feet of floor area, (includes 543 square foot lanai), for property located at 9566 Gulfshore Drive, further described as the north 50 feet of Lot 14 and all of Lots 15 & 16, Block B, Connors Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit 1, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 9, Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. Ail material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISISONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) , July 26, 2002 Austin White/Becket & Poliakoff, P.A. 3003 Tamiami Trail North Suite 210 Naples, FL 34103 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition VA-2001-AR-2015 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, September 10, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, August 25, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk Enclosure July 26, 2002 Manatee Resort Condo Assoc. 9566 Gulfshore Drive Naples, FL 34108 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition VA-2001-AR-2015 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, September 10, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, August 25, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Teri Michaels To: Subject: Thanks Para! paperrell@naplesnews.com VA-2001-AR-2015 VA-2001-AR-2015. doc VA-2001-AR-2015. doc Teri Michaels From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Friday, July 26, 2002 9:50 AM Teri Michaels Delivered: VA-2001-AR-2015 VA-2001-AR-2015 <<VA-2001-AR-2015>> Your message To: ' poperrell~naplesnews.com' Subject: VA-2001-AR-2015 Sent: Fri, 26 ,Tul 2002 10:04:05-0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pomela on Fri, 26 ,Tul 2002 09:50:23 -0400 naplesnews.com I Online Classified I Public Notices Page 1 of 1 Ordinances and Petitions VA-2001-AR-2015 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 10, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition VA-2001-AR-2015. Austin White, of Backer & Poliakoff, P.A., representing unit owners of the Manatee Resort Condominium Association, requesting relief in the RT zoning district from the 500 square foot maximum size for a hotel unit set forth in LDC Section 2.2.8.4.7.2.1, to allow four (4) units of the total 19 as built units to have 3,200 square feet of floor area, (includes 550 square foot lanai) and to allow 15 units to have 2,625 square feet of floor area, (includes 543 square foot lanai), for property located at 9566 Gult'shore Drive, further described as the north 50 t?eet of'Lot 14 and all of Lots 15 & 16, Block B, Connors Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit l, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 9, Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISISONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORiDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By:/s/Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Aug. 25 No. 2078823 [- Save Ad Ad first appeared:AUG 25,2002 VA-2G01-AR-~IS NOTK:E OF PU~L.iC HEARING Notice Is hereby given that the Beard of Couetv Commissioners of Collier County will hold a pubflc 'hearing on Tuesday, 'the Boardroom, 3ra Floor, Admlnlsfratlon Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 ISaai Tan'daml Trail, N~ple~ Florida. The _The _Bglll~ will cemlder I Austtn White, of Backer ~ I ~n~tee Resort Cando- /mialum Assoclatia~, re- /questing toilet In 1he RT / 500 sauare foot max!mum. /size for a hotel un~ SeT ''orth In LDC Section L2.8.4.7.2.1, to allow four ~4) unlls of Itle total 19 as ~ullt un~ to have 3,200 ~luare feet of floar ~ea~ [Includes 550 square Ianal) and to allow 15 u.n~ Io hove 2,625 square of ~ area, (Includes _543 square toot lanai), Gulfshore ur~ve, mrmer ~escrlbed as t~e north 50 feet of Lot 14 and all of .ors 15 & 16~ Blncl~ B, Can- ~rs Vande~ltt Beach Es- ~tes Unff 1, as recorded n Plat Book 3, Page 9, ~olller County, F[arlda. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak .on a.n.y 1agenda Item must re~s.- Iter wl~ the County Aa- |mlnlstralor briar to pre- Iffem to be - |divldual speakers will be /any item. TM selectton of /an Individual to sl:a~ak off /behaif of an organization / or ~-oup Is encodro~d, ff / recognized by .the Choir, a [sIx~es4~rs~__ mr a I or organization may oe m- I lotted 10 minutes to speak anan from. Persons wishing to I materials Included In. m.e IBeard agenda pacRe~s I must submit said material la minimum of 3 weeks /prlar ~ ~.e r.e~e ~publia Mar ng. ,n any case, written materials In- by ~e Board shall be s.u~b- County staff a .mln!m.u.m of seven days prior ~o m~ public hearing. All materi- al used In presentations before 1be Board will come a permanent part of the record. ~e ~tawllll need a re- cord af tbe pr~e. edlngs. oertalnlng there~o t~eretore, may neea TO ensure ~ a verl~_ m record of the procee~ngs Is made, which record In: dudes ~ testimony ann ,vldence uPan which ,~oeal Is based. ~ARD OF COUNTY ;OFRAAI~SONER$ :OLLIER COUNTY, :LOffiDA IAAAES N. COLETTA, :HAIR/~,~AN :)WIGHT F- BROC;~, ::L.BRK ~¥:/s/Tort Michaels, No, "xt78823 http ://www.naplesnews. corn/cgi-bin/class/GENERAL/class_res.pl 8/26/2002 Maureen.A. Kenyon From: Sent: To: Subject: Deselem, Kay Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:17 AM Filson, Sue; Johnson, Connie; Schmitt, Joseph; Murray, Susan; Martin, Cecilia; Student, Majorie; White, Patrick; Mudd, James; Weigel, David; Brock, Mary; Minutes and Records UPDATE--Manatee Towe~ VA,2002.AR~20:i~~INUANCE REQUEST; for 9/10/02 BCC Please note that the agent has faxed a REVISED continuance request to me regarding the above referenced case. The applicant is now seeking a continuance the same reason. THANKS Kay Deselem, AICP Current Planning/Planning Services Collier County, Florida Government Phone: (239)213-2931 Fax: (239)213-2916 Maize Maureen A. Kenyon Page 1 of 1 From: Sent: To: Cc: Diaz, Aha Monday, August 26, 2002 11:59 AM Brock, Mary Filson, Sue; Maureen A. Kenyon Subject: FW: Continued Items for the BCC Agenda MaryJo, This item has been continued indefinitely. :.~.'._. ~__~..-..~..,:,,~...~_'~_~i iN WHITE. OF BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A., REPRESENTING UNIT ~""O~/NERS OF THE MANATEE RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, REQUESTING RELIEF IN THE RT ZONING DISTRICT FROM THE 500 SQUARE FOOT MAXIMUM SIZE FOR A HOTEL UNIT SET FORTH iN LDC SECTION 2.2.8.4.7.2.1., TO ALLOW FOUR (4) UNITS OF THE TOTAL 19 AS- BUILT UNITS TO HAVE 3,200 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA (INCLUDES 550 SQUARE FOOT LANAI) AND TO ALLOW 15 UNITS TO HAVE 2,625 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA (INCLUDES 543 SQUARE FOOT LANAI), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9566 GULFSHORE DRIVE, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS THE NORTH 50 OF LOT 14 AND ALL OF LOTS 15 & 16, BLOCK B, CONNERS VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES UNIT 1, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. This item has been continued to the Oct. 22, 2002 BCC meeting. RZ-2001-AR-1595, JAMES G. O'GARA OF MARQUETTE, DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, REPRESENTING GOLDEN GATE CAPITAL, LTD., REQUESTING A REZONE FROM RSF-3 TO RSF- 5 FOR A SEVENTEEN-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME SUBDIVISION ON 4.26+/- ACRES ON 2951 44TH TERRACE SW, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS GOLDEN GATE UNIT 3, BLOCK 103, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGES 97-105, COLLIER COUNTY RECORDS, IN SECTION 27 TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. This item has been continued to the Oct. 22, 2002 BCC meeting. RZ-2001-AR-1596, JAMES O'GARA OF MARQUETTE, DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, REPRESENTING GOLDEN GATE CAPITAL, LTD., REQUESTING A REZONE FROM RSF-3 TO RSF-5 FOR A THIRTEEN-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION ON 3.15+ ACRES LOCATED AT 4501 30TH AVENUE SW, IN GOLDEN GATE UNIT #3, BLOCK 104, PARCEL 1, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGES 97-105, COLLIER COUNTY RECORDS, IN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Thanks, Ana Iris Diaz Administrative Secretary Community Development and Environmental Services AnaDiaz@¢olliergov.net (941 )403-2385 (941)403-2395 Fax 8/26/2002 Maureen A. Kenyon From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Deselem, Kay Monday, August 26, 2002 9:49 AM Filson, Sue; Johnson, Connie; Schmitt, Joseph; Murray, Susan; Martin, Cecilia; Student, Majorie; White, Patrick; Mudd, James; Weigel, David; Brock, Mary; Minutes and Records Austin White (E-mail) Manatee Towers, VA-2002-AR-2015--CONTINUANCE REQUEST; for 9/10/02 BCC Please note that the agent has faxed a continuance request to me regarding the above referenced case. The applicant is seeking an indefinite continuance for the following stated purpose: "The applicant is working to amend the Site Development Plan (SDP) to allow for the residential use of the nineteen (19) units in the Manatee Resort Condominium, which have been constructed and sold by the Developer to nineteen (19) individual unit owners." THANKS Kay Deselem, AICP Current Planning/Planning Services Collier County, Florida Government Phone: (239)213-2931 Fax: (239)213-2916 Maureen A. Kenyon From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Johnson, Connie Friday, August 23, 2002 9:34 AM Brock, Mary; Bodine, Judi; Filson, Sue; Maureen A. Kenyon Diaz, Ana FW: Continuance for Manatee variance petition Good morning ladies, Please be advised that petition VA-2001-AR-2015 - Manatee Two Towers has been continued from the 9/10 BCC meeting to a date that has not yet been determined. We will advsie as soon as we are notified by the petitioner. Thank you. Connie ..... Original Message ..... From: DeselemKay Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 9:28 ~M To: johnson_c Cc: DiazAna Subject: RE: Continuance for Manatee variance petition yep. I don't know what date yet. I will know when the applicant's agent submits the completed continuance form. I will advise you when I hear. THANKS Kay Deselem, AICP Current Planning/Planning Services Collier County, Florida Government Phone: (239)213-2931 Fax: (239)213-2916 ..... Original Message ..... From: johnson_c Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 8:33 To: DeselemKay Cc: DiazAna Subject: FW: Continuance for Manatee variance petition Good morning Kay, Do I understand that this item is being continued from the 9/10 BCC meeting to a later date? Thanks. Connie ..... Original Message ..... From: SchmittJoseph Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 9:42 PM To: johnson_c Cc: murray_s; wuerstlemargaret; martin_c; thurston_k; white_p; DeselemKay; 'Austin White' Subject: RE: Continuance for Manatee variance petition Connie, Please set up a meeting with Margaret, Susan, Kay, Patrick, David (CA), and Jim Mudd sometime after Sep 3 so that we can lay out all the issues and 1 facts. Patrick, Susan -- need to be prepared to discuss impacts on other related issues/projects. Joe ..... Original Message ..... From: white_p Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 5:00 PM To: DeselemKay; 'Austin White' Cc: murray_s; SchmittJoseph; wuerstlemargaret; martin c; thurston k Subject: RE: Continuance for Manatee variance petitio~ -- My understanding is there are no such costs unless the hearing is not continued to a known date and time certain stated no later than the 9/10 meeting. The sooner we know the date & time the better! Patrick G. White, Esq. Assistant County Attorney Telephone: (239) 659-5709 Facsimile: (239) 659-5720 e-mail: patrickwhite@colliergov.net ..... Original Message ..... From: DeselemKay Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 4:56 PM To: 'Austin White' Cc: murray_s; SchmittJoseph; wuerstlemargaret; martin_c; thurston_k; white_p Subject: RE: Continuance for Manatee variance petition I don't know how long it may take you to resolve the issue; that has to be your call. However I would offer that I will not be in the office for the 9/24 BCC meeting, so you may wish to continue to a date other than that one. Bear in mind that your client will need to pay any re-advertisin9 costs due to the continuance. THAiqKS ! Kay Deselem, AICP Current Planning/Planning Services Collier County, Florida Government Phone: (239)213-2931 Fax: (239)213-2916 ..... Original Message ..... From: Austin White [mailto:AWHITE@becker-poliakoff.com] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 3:55 PM To: DeselemKay Subject: Re: RESENDING--Have you made a decision regarding this? Yes. We wish to continue the variance request while we continue to work to resolve the issue of the use of the property, please let me know the date that the matter can be continued to, so that I can submit the written request to your office. Thank you. >>> DeselemKay <KayDeselem@colliergov.net> 08/22/02 03:38PM >>> Manatee Tower 9/10 BCC continuance request I got your phone message regarding a request to continue the Manatee Tower case for the 9/10 BCC hearing. To answer your questions: You asked me what reason to use to seek the continuance. You can state the reason as you know it to be. Perhaps a general statement that you are investigating alternative solutions to reach compliance or something similar may be appropriate. As to whether you can seek an indefinite continuance, I would respond that you can ask for it, but obviously it is the Board who ultimately grants or does not grant your request to continue. I have attached a copy of the continuance form. <<REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OR WITHDRAWAL.doc>> THANKS Kay Deselem, AICP Current Planning/Planning Services Collier County, Florida Government Phone: (239)213-2931 Fax: (239)213-2916 Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMHISSIONERS CHERI LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 1131383126~91 58510473 VA-2001-AR-2015 NOTI State of FLorida County of CoLlier Before the undersigned authority, personaLLy appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily neuspaper published a~ Naples, in Collier County, FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, FLorida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter mt the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; end affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pubLiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 08/25 AD SPACE: 108.000 INCH FILED ON: 08/26/02 ....... ..... * ........................... Personally knoun by me L~ ] , { 5//g~ ~"~-~ ~'. - RECEIVED r/ /Va /vc DEPT VA-2001-AR-2015 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice Is hereby given Commissioners of Cotller County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 10, 2OO2, In the Boardroom. 3rd Floor, Administration GOvernment Center, 3301 East Tamkimi Troll; Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin of 9~0 A.M. The Board will &oaslder patroon IAusfln White, of Be~e~ & IJ~nefee Resort Condo- Imlnlu,.m Asseclofl_o~. ~e- :luas~ng relief I~fMe RT ~00 S~lUore foot m~xlmum die for a hotel unit set 'orth In LDC Section I~.4.7.2.1, to allow four units of the total 19 as lit units to have 3,~00 k xd) and to Mow 15 units t( _have 2)25 square feet a hoar area, (Includes 543 s, uore foot lanai), for p ~oortv k)cated ,at 9566 G llfshore Drive, further d Kribed as the norih 50 feet of Lot 14 and all of ILats 15 & 10, Block B, G(gl- Inars Vanderblit Beach Itales Unit 1, as recorded /~shlng to ~ o~ limited to 5 minutes on any iten~ The selection I re~lzed by _the cfielr, 1 Persons wishing to have written or grc~hlc Bo~rd a~nda packets must submit ~ld material case, written materials In- by ~ Board shall be sub- miffed to rfle~ appro~rlofe County ~ ~ minimum J Any parson who decld. I cord of the l~Oceedlngs pertulnlne fhereto and ensure lhut a verbatim m mede, whl~ record In- ev~la~l~ w~lch the A.I oF COU.T COMMI~ISONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAM~S N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN By:/s/Tell Michaels, LuSts. ~ No. ~0788~i Teri Michaels From: Sent: To: Subject: Deselem, Kay Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:44 AM Filson, Sue; Johnson, Connie; Schmitt, Joseph; Murray, Susan; Martin, Cecilia; Student, Majorie; White, Patrick; Mudd, James; Weigel, David; Brock, Mary; Minutes and Records Manatee Towers VA-2002-AR-2015 new continuance date. The agent submitted a revised continuance request for the Manatee Resort variance application identified above. The applicant is now seeking a continuance from the September 10, 2002 BCC meeting to October 22, 2002. THANKS! Kay beselem, AICP Current Planning/Planning Services Collier County, Florida Government Phone: (239)213-2931 Fax: (239)213-2916 September 4, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: VA-2001-AR-2015 Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, October 6, 2002, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk P.O./Account # 113-138312-649110 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition VA-2001-AR-2015 Austin White, of Backer & Poliakoff, P.A., representing unit owners of the Manatee Resort Condominium Association, requesting relief in the RT zoning district from the 500 square foot maximum size for a hotel unit set forth in LDC Section 2.2.8.4.7.2.1, to allow four (4) units of the total 19 as built units to have 3,200 square feet of floor area, (includes 550 square foot lanai) and to allow 15 units to have 2,625 square feet of floor area, (includes 543 square foot lanai), for property located at 9566 Gulfshore Drive, further described as the north 50 feet of Lot 14 and all of Lots 15 & 16, Block B, Connors Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit 1, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 9, Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization.or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. Ail material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISISONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) September 4, 2002 Austin White/Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. 3003 Tamiami Trail North Suite 210 Naples, FL 34103 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition VA-2001-AR-2015 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 6, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure September 4, 2002 Manatee Resort Condo Assoc. 9566 Gulfshore Drive Naples, FL 34108 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition VA-2001-AR-2015 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 6, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Carleen A. Edwards To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com VA-2001 -AR-2015 Good Morning, Attached is advertising for October 6, 2002 (Sun.) Thank you, and have a Good Day. VA-2001-AR-2015. VA-2001-AR-2015. doc doc Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@clerk.collier.fi.us Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:00 AM Carleen A. Edwards Delivery Status Notification (Relay) A'l-I-/5235.txl: VA-2001-AR-2015 This is an automatically 9enerated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals~naplesnews.com Ellie J. Hoffman From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Deselem, Kay Monday, October 21,2002 4:04 PM Murray,'Susan; wuerstlemargaret; Bellows, Ray Schmitt, Joseph; Minutes and Records; Filson, Sue; Johnson, Connie; Brock, Mary; Martin, Cecilia Manatee Towers variance for 10/22 BCC Petition # VA-2002-AR-2015, Item 7B The petition has been continued by the applicant's agent until 11/19/02. Joe Schmitt is advising the Commissioners this afternoon of the continuance request. THANKS Kay Deselem, AICP Current Planning/Planning Services Collier County, Florida Government Phone: (239)213-2931 Fax: (239)213-2916 VA-2001-AR-2015 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Naples Dai Ly News Notice Is hereby given Naples, FL :~/+102 thaf ~he Board of County Commissioners o~ Cailler - _ Affidavit of Publication _ _ - - - · _COUl~y Will hold a pubic ~ . Building_', Collier coun?v oovern- menf Center, 3301 East Tarnloml Troll, I~les, Flor d~. The meeting will BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS begln~.0OA.NL CHERI LEFARA The Board will consider/ PO BOX ~13016 Peflflo~ VA-2001-AR-2015 NAPLES F L ~/+101-3016 Austin Whlte, of B(~.ker & POIk3koff, P~., re, resent. lng unif owners of ~hel miriam Assoclofion, re-I questing roi ef n fl~ RT zoning distrtcf from fl~e REFERENCE: 001230 113138]126491 500 so~Jo~e fool m~ximum 58531/~91 VA-2001-AR-2015NOTIC size for a hofel unlf set fortfl in LDC 5ecfion 2.2~.4.7.2;1. fo allow four (4) units ofthe fo~l 19 a bullf unlt~ fo hove 3~0 _square feet of floor c~ec (Includes 550 square fo~ I~1) and fo allow 15 unit State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News/ a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily Hews is a newspaper published at Naples/ in said Collier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples/ in said Collier County, FLorida, for a period of I year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person/ firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 10/06 AD SPACE: 11~.000 INCH FILED ON: 10/07/02 ....... ...... . ........................... Sworn to and Subscribed b~L~e .e Personally known by ma ~ ), RECEIVED oct FINANCE DEPT fo hove 2,625 square fee of floor e':~a, (Includes 54; ~luare foot l.anal), fo ~e Drive, furlhe, dsscrlbed as ~e norl~ ,~ foof of Lof 14 and all of. Lois 15 & 16, Block B, Coe~ nors Vendef;bllt Beach Es- tates Untt 1, os recorded In Plat .~3~ ~ 9, Collier NOT~: All P~t~Ims wish- lng fo .~ on any ng~n- ~ho ~ Admlnl~r~r agenaa ~em TO ~e aa- ers will organization or grou~ Is encouraged. If reco~lzed ~s?p ~or a grou~ ar organlz. a~en mav be atloffid 10 .an PerSons wlshlng fo have .wr_t~. n or g~'..~c 'malerl- als lncl~l~e B~d nmum of 3 ~s ~wl~' fo hearlr~ In any case, wrff- ten ma~'lals In~nded fo be considered by the Beard shall be submiffed STalT a minimum Of seven s Prier fo the oubllc ~rn~-~r~ Ix~rt of the re. Cord ~ a dsclslon of the Beard w#l need a record of. the proceedings I~er. tamlpg thereto .,end sure ttmta verbatim re- cludei ~e festlmonv and evidence upon which fha al~eai Is based. . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMtaSONER5 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAPMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Carleen Edwards, SDark RESOLUTION NO. 02- 4 7 8 -A RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA-2002-AR- 2015, FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected and lawfully constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a variance from the required 500 square foot maximum size for a hotel unit set forth in LDC Section 2.2.8.4.7.2.1., to allow four (4) units of the total 19 as built units to have 2,650 square feet of floor area, and to allow 15 units to have 2,085 square feet of floor area, in the "RT" Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provisions and arrangements have been not made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board has fully considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: Petition VA-2002-AR-2015, filed by Becker & Polliakoff, P.A., representing the Manatee Resort Condominium Association, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: The North 50 feet of Lot 14, and all of Lots 15 and 16, Block B, Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit 1, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 9, of the Official Record Books of Collier County, Florida be and the same hereby is DENIED for the requested variance based upon the evidence and comments made as part of the record. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA-2002-AR- 2015 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote. Done this ? ~-- day of Clerk Attest as to Chafrman's sfgnatu~e 2002. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Patrick G. White Assistant County Attorney VA-2002-AR-2015/KD/lo COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: Normal legal Advertisement (Display Adv., location, etc.) X Other: See Attached Originating Dept/Div: Comm. Dev. Serv./Comp. Planning Person: Marcia R. Kendall Petition No. (If none, give brief description): N/A Petitioner: (Name & Address): N/A Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) N/A Hearing before: XXX BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: November 19, 2002 Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News Other [] Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: See Attached Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: N/A Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? x Yes [] No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 111-138317-649110 Date: October 31, 2002 Division Head Date List Attachments: Advertisement Request (and copy of Ordinance). Based on advertisement appearing 10 and 5 days before hearing. Approved by: County Manager Date DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to Clerk's Office [] Requesting Division [] Original B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR Date Received: ./tg/,~.~ft~,~DateofPublichearing: /~,//,,~,~z,~' DateAdvertised:[/!Z~////.J/6,,l.~ CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: ~ .'8B November 19, 2002 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Friday November 8, 2002 and Wednesday, November 13, 2002, and furnish proof of publication to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement should be no less than one-quarter page and the headline in the advertisement should be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement should not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. ,8B NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, November 19, 2002 in the County Commissioners Boardroom, 3ra Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida the Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing to consider the adoption of the following County Ordinance, Amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The Title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 02- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, AND THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The purpose of the hearing is to consider the Adoption of the Future Land Use Element, Capital Improvement Element and Transportation Element to the Growth Management Plan in response to the Objections, Comments and Recommendations Report of the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), according to the Procedures and Criteria outlined in Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendments are available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, 4th Floor, Administration Building, County Government Center, East Naples, Florida; and at Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to November 19, 2002, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. 8B I~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk ( SEAL ) I T485 I T475 I T48S I T4gS I TSOS I T615 I I 0 .XJ.NIgOO OBV~O~B ~LLNIgOO 3(]¥0 62 -'~'S / / o~ 8B ORDINANCE NO. 02- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, AND THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187; Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Collier County did submit this Growth Management Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review on July 3, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs did review and issue its Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report (ORC) to the Future Land Use Element, Capital Improvement Element and Transportation Element amendments to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted the same in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 60 days from receipt of this ORC Report from the Department of Community Affairs, to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold public heatings concerning the adoption of the Future Land Use Element, Capital Improvement Element, and the Transportation Element amendments to the Growth Management Plan on November 19, 2002; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of these amendments to the Future Land Use Element, Capital Improvement Element and the Transportation Element, including the following: the Collier County staff report; and the other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meetings of the Collier County Planning Commission held November 7, 2002, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on November 19, 2002; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, AND TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts these amendments to the Future Land Use Element, Capital Improvement Element and the Transportation Element in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The amendments are attached hereto as Exhibit "A' and is incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of these amendments shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendments in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders or development permits dependent on these amendments may be issued or land uses dependent on these amendments commence before they have become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, these amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which Resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3rd Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the County Commissioners of Collier County this __ day of ., 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Marjorie M. Student, Assistant County Attorney COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONCURRENCY AMENDMENTS CCPC OCTOBER 17, 2002 BCC NOVEMBER 19, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA November 19, 2002 9:00 a.m. NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 99-22 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (239) 774-8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1 November 19, 2002 1. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SWEARING IN OF COMMISSIONER FRANK HALAS BY JUDGE LAWREN MARTIN 2. AGENDA AND MINUTES A. Approval of today's regular, consent and summary agenda as amended. (Ex Parte Disclosure provided by Commission members for summary agenda.) B. October 22, 2002- Regular Meeting 3. SERVICE AWARDS 4. PROCLAMATIONS A. Proclamation to recognize November 24-30 as National Farm City Week. To be accepted by Mr. David Santee. B. Proclamation to observe December 1, 2002 as National World AIDS Day. To be accepted by Andrea Taylor, Betty Ford and Betty Aubut. 5. PRESENTATIONS A. Presentation by the United Arts Council of Collier County to present the Collier County Cultural Assessment and Plan. 6. PUBLIC PETITIONS A. Public Petition Request by Mr. Jim Kramer as received via facsimile. 7. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A. This item has been continued from the September 107 2002 BCC Meeting. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. VA-2002-AR-2015 Austin White, of Becker and Poliakoff, P.A., representing unit owners of the Manatee Resort Condominium Association, requesting relief in the RT Zoning District from the 500 square foot maximum size for a hotel unit set forth in LDC Section 2.2.8.4.7.2.1, to allow four (4) units of the total 19 as-built units to have 3,200 square feet of floor area (includes 550 square foot lanai) and to allow 15 units to have 2,625 square feet of floor area (includes 543 square foot lanai), for property located at 9566 Gulfshore Drive, further described as tl~e North 50 feet of Lot 14 and all of Lots 15 and 16, Block B, Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit 1, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 9, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. 8. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition PUDA-01-AR-431, James G. 2 November 19, 2002 8B O'Gara representing Park East Development Ltd., requesting a rezone from "PUD" Planned Unit Development to PUD for the purpose of amending the Founders Plaza PUD to allow additional small-scale retail land uses only on those parcels that exceed 150 feet in depth for property located on the North and South sides of Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) and at the Santa Barbara Canal Crossing in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners adopt amendments to the Capital Improvement Element; Transportation Element; and Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the "Concurrency" Amendments, DCA No. 02-2. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Public Hearing to consider adoption of an Ordinance establishing the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 (CDD2) pursuant to Section 190.005, Florida Statutes. 9. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A. Discussion regarding the revision of the sign ordinance to allow for neon open signs at establishments. (Commissioner Fiala.) 10. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT Approve a Revised Right-of-Way Permit and Inspection Fee Schedule for the Transportation Operations Department. (Norman Feder, Administrator, Transportation Division) Consider request for funding from Tourism Alliance of Collier County in approximate amount of $10,000 to terminate its corporate affairs. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding to establish an area of mutual concern within which both the City of Marco Island and Collier County will be provided a courtesy review of proposed Land Development Projects involving Incorporated and Unincorporated Areas along the SR 951 and CR 92 corridors within five miles of the Marco Island City Limits. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) Review Tourist Development related advertising and promotion invoices, determine expenditures serve a public purpose, approve appropriate invoices for payment in the amount of $14,850.47 from Fund 194 Reserves, and deny payment of invoice in the amount of $3,857.00, as recommended by the Tourist Development Council. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) E. Request approval and funding of two (2) full time positions to establish a Tourist Development Department, as recommended by the Tourist Development Council. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) 3 November 19, 2002 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT This item has a Time Certain of 12:00 noon. Closed Attorney-Client Session pursuant to Section 286.011(8), Fla. Stat., to discuss Settlement Negotiations/Litigation Expenses in Aquaport v. Collier County, Case No. 2:01-CV-341-FTM-29DNF, now pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. For the Board of County Commissioners to provide direction to outside Counsel, Ted Tripp, Esq., and the Office of the County Attorney as to Settlement Negotiations/Litigation Expenses in Aquaport v. Collier County, Case No. 2:01-CV-341-FTM-29DNF, now pending in the United States District Court of the Middle District of Florida. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners ratify and authorize the retention of Ted Tripp, Esq., and the Law Firm of Garvin and Tripp to represent Collier County in the Bert Harris Act Claim filed by Aquaport Plaintiffs. 13. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 14. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 15. STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS 16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Naples Gateway, Phase I". 2) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Catamaran Court at Tarpon Cove". 3) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Tarpon Cove". 4) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Pelican Marsh Unit Twenty- Two". 4 November 19, 2002 s) Request to approve for recording the final plat of "Hemingway PI ~" and approval of the Standard Form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. 6) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Pine Air Lakes Unit One". 7) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Stonebridge Unit Three". 8) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Huntington Lakes Unit Two". 9) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Huntington Lakes Unit Three". 10) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Huntington Lakes Unit Four". 11) Petition CARNY-2002-AR-3335, Pastor Ettore Rubin, C.S., Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, requesting permit to conduct a carnival from November 27 through December 1, 2002, on Church property located at 207 South 9th Street, Immokalee. 12) Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2002-003 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Lloyd L. Bowein regarding violation of Sections 2.7.6.5, as amended of the Collier County Land Development Code. 13) Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2002-065 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Leonardo Portal regarding violation of Ordinance No. 91-102 as amended, Sections 2.7.6.1 and 1.5.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 14) Recommendation to approve Commercial Excavation Permit No. 59.835/AR-3135 "Livingston Lakes Commercial Excavation", located in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East; bounded on the North by vacant agriculture zoning and stiles PUD, on the West by Livingston Road right-of-way, on the East by Donovan Center PUD, and on the South vacant agriculture zoning. 15) Transfer $35,000 of funds from Utility Regulation Reserves to fund outside legal services in support of Resolution 2002-428 opposing the.Acquisition of the Marco Island/Marco Shores Utility System by the Florida Water Services Authority. B. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 1) Approve a Budget Amendment to combine funds in the Radio Road Beautification MSTU into one Project Number 60081 in the amount of $155,800. 5 November 19, 2002 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 8B Approve a Budget Amendment to transfer funds from the Golden Gate Parkway Landscape Maintenance Account into the CR951 Phase A and B Landscape Maintenance Account. Request that the Board of County Commissioners approve a donation agreement and accept a drainage easement from the Sabal Lake Subdivision Homeowners Association, Inc., for a parcel of land containing 0.07 acres for the purpose of providing additional drainage within the community which will allow the County legal access as required for all common drainage facilities within the common area of this development. Request that the Board of County Commissioners adopt an Ordinance amending Collier County Ordinance No. 2001-76, as amended, which created the Livingston Road Phase II Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit; providing for amendment to Section Six to increase the number of members who serve on the Advisory Committee from five to nine; providing for amendment to Section Six to limit membership on the Advisory Committee to three members from each subdivision or community; providing for inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances; providing for conflict and severability; and providing for an effective date. Approve Resolutions to establish "No Parking" Zones along the County road rights-of-way of Industrial Boulevard and Corporate Square Boulevard at a cost of approximately $2600. Approve an Interagency Agreement between Collier County and the State of Florida Department of Corrections, Hendry Correctional Institution, for continued use of inmate labor in road maintenance activities. Request the Board of County Commissioners adopt an Ordinance amending Collier County Ordinance No. 96-84 which created the Radio Road Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit; providing for amendment to Section Three to expand the purpose to include the cost for curbing watering facilities; plantings and maintenance of the median areas of any public roadway adjoining Radio Road within the boundaries of the unit; providing for inclusion in the Code of Laws. Approve Work Order No. BRC-FT-02-04 with Better Roads Inc., for median improvements in the amount of $128,317.75 on Pine Ridge Road, Project No. 60016, and adopt a Resolution reducing the speed limit on Pine Ridge Road from forty-five miles per hour (45 MPH) to forty miles per hour (40 MPH) in the vicinity of Naples Boulevard Intersection. Approve Budget Amendments to carry forward funds in sevej'al projects to re-open purchase orders in FY03 that were closed by mistake in FY02 in the amount of $100,996.70. Request the Board to adopt a Resolution authorizing Transportation Division Administrator and Transportation Maintenance Director to sign the Certification of Disbursements for the FDOT Asset Management Maintenance Agreement, Contract Number BD-418, Financial Project Number 412918-72-01. 6 November 19, 2002 11) Approve a Budget Amendment to recognize unanticipated revenue in the amount of $1,400,000 for the proposed Immokalee Road/I-75 Interchange Project for the improvements related to the Tarpon Bay Boulevard/Northbrooke Drive Intersection Improvements, Project No. 66042A. 12) Approve a request to apply for a FY 03-04 Community Development Block Grant in the amount of $195,000 for construction of a sidewalk along Colorado Avenue in Immokalee. C. PUBLIC UTILITIES 1) Approve Budget Amendment to cancel the Marco Island Breakwater Modifications Project and return to the Tourist Tax Reserves $699,500. D. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Approve a request to apply for a FY03-04 Community Development Block Grant in the amount of $700,000 for construction of a Senior Center addition to the existing East Naples Community Center. 2) Approve a Lease Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation for Collier Boulevard Boating Park. 3) Approve a Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program Grant Agreement for up to $120,000 for improvements at Bayview Park. 4) Award Work Order #PBS-02-06 in the amount of $190,161 to Professional Building Systems for the renovation of Immokalee Airport Park. 5) Approve a Budget Amendment for the increase in Medicaid Waiver Revenue and Program Costs in the amount of $16,930. E. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1) Award Contracts #02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services" (Estimated Annual Amount $275,000). 2) Approve Change Order No. One, Work Order BSSW-02-01, in the amount of $10,275.00, with Barany, Schmitt, Summers, Weaver and Partners, Inc. for design services for construction of EMS #19. 3) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve and ratify a Settlement Agreement resolving the Lawsuit styled Collier County vs. Chesley McDonald, Case No. 02-1520-CC, County Court; Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida. 4) Approval of a Contract between Collier County and Community Health Partners Inc., for managed care services for the County's Group Health and Workers' Compensation Program. 5) Approve an Amendment to Agreement for the conveyance of GAC Trust Reserved Lands to the District School Board of Collier County, Florida, for 7 November 19, 2002 future construction of an elementary school in Golden Gate Estates, not to exceed ten dollars ($10.00). 6) Approval of elimination of the Sick Leave Bank Program and an increase in the Short Term Disability Benefit Program. F. COUNTY MANAGER 1) Award hurricane shelter upgrade and retrofit Contract #02-3429 to Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc., for the roof retrofit and shutter upgrade of the Laurel Oak and Vineyards Elementary Schools in the amount of $48,750. This project is 100% reimbursed from the State. 2) Selection of Underwriters (RFP 02-3435) in anticipation of financing future infrastructure improvements in Collier County. G. AIRPORT AUTHORITY H. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 1) Miscellaneous Items to File for Record as Directed. J. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 1) Recommendation to adopt the Budget Amendment appropriating Carry Forward and Expenditure Budgets for open purchase orders at the end of Fiscal Year 2002. 2) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve Carry Forward Funding for the Sheriff's Office. 3) That the Board of County Commissioners make a determination of whether the purchases of goods and services documented in the detailed report of Open Purchase Orders serve a valid public purpose and authorize the expenditure of County funds to satisfy said purchases. A copy of the Goods and Services Document is on display in the County Manager's Office, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, W. Harmon Turner Building, Naples, FL. K. COUNTY ATTORNEY 1) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners' adopt and ratify the termination of a Lawsuit against a Collier County Employee, which sought reimbursement of a debt owed to the County by the Employee in the sum of Eleven Hundred Three Dollars and Sixty-Two Cents ($1,103.62), plus costs, on the basis that the County Employee has filed a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. 2) Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the Easement Acquisition of Parcel 101 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. Roberto 8 November 19, 2002 17. Bollt, Successor Trustee, under Land Trust Agreement Dated 1/27/86, et al, Case No. 00-2433-CA (Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road Intersection) Project #60171. 3) Acceptance of payment of previously unpaid Education, Community and Regional Parks and Library Impact Fees for Bentley Village and Education Impact Fees for Encore Senior Living and approval of refunds due to facilities. 4) Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the Easement Acquisition of Parcel 132 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. James R. Colosimo, Trustee under Unrecorded Land Trust Agreement dated 12/10/92, et al, Case No. 00-0138-CA (Pine Ridge Road Project #60111). 5) Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the Fee Simple Acquisition of Parcel 171 in the Lawsuit Styled Collier County v. Ismael Gonzales, et al, Case No. 02-2159-CA (Immokalee Road Project #60018). SUMMARY AGENDA - THIS SECTION IS FOR ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1) A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2) UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OR OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OF ALL MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3) NO WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE ITEM RECEIVED BY STAFF, THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE BCC MEETING ON WHICH THE ITEMS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD; AND 4) NO INDIVIDUALS ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE ITEM. SHOULD ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS BE MOVED TO THE REGULAR AGENDA ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST BE SWORN IN. Petition PUDA-2002-AR-2566, Robert Mulhere of RWA, Inc., representing J.E.D. of Southwest Florida, Inc., and Colony Corporate Center, Inc., requesting an amendment to the "Pelican Marsh" Planned Unit Development (PUD), for the purpose of increasing the allocation of Medical Office Space allowed from 9,000 square feet to 26,000 square feet within the approved overall general office leaseable floor area of 295,888 square feet for property located North of Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 901) and East of Livingston Road, in Sections 25, 27, 34, 35 and 36, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, and Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Petition DOA-2002-AR-2567, Robert Mulhere of RWA, Inc., representing J.E.D. of Southwest Florida, Inc., and Colony Corporate Center, Inc., requesting an amendment to the "Pelican Marsh" Development of Regional Impact (DRI) for the purpose of increasing the allocation of Medical Office Space allowed from 9,000 square feet to 26,000 square feet within the approved overall general office leaseable floor area of 295,888 square feet and to correct a Scrivener's Error contained within the Development Order for property located North of Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 901) and East of Livingston Road, in Sections 25, 27, 34, 35 and 36, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, and Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. 9 November 19, 2002 INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 774-8383. 10 November 19, 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY "8B RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADOPT AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT; AND FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE "CONCURRENCY" AMENDMENTS, DCA NO. 02-2. OB,~ECTIVE: To have the Board adopt the 2002-Second Cycle amendments to the Growth Management Plan (DCA No. 02-2), referred to as the "Concurrency" Amendments. BACKGROUND: In response to policy direction from the Board to the County Manager, finalized at the BCC meeting of May 14, 2002, a second 2002 Growth Management Plan amendment cycle was initiated. The Board heard and deliberated on three separate road conditions related agenda items on May 14, 2002. These included a moratorium ordinance for three road segments (Item 10A.), a status report from the Transportation Administrator on the implementation of real-time concurrency roads impact analysis for new development approvals (Item 10B.) and a proposed referendum on the issue of roads concurrency (Item 10C.). Staff drafted the proposed amendments to support adoption of a new real-time "q~ckbook" transportation concurrency management system into Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code (LDC). The transmittal public hearings were held before the CCPC on June 20, 2002 and the BCC on June 25, 2002. The intent of the proposed amendments, as transmitted, was to replace the current once a year (AUIR) concurrency determination for roads with a real-time "checkbook" methodology. Under a real-time traffic impact analysis system, the impacts of each final local development order on the available service volume capacity of all impacted road segments would be analyzed and applied prior to final approval. The Annual Update Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR) would continue to be the concurrency status notification to the BCC for Water, Sewer, Drainage, Solid Waste and Parks. Capacity and allocations of each facility, except roads, would continue to be monitored by the departments responsible for the management and planning for these facilities during the twelve months following the policy direction by the BCC on needed projects and funding identified in the AUIR. However, the AUIR would include a "checkbook balancing" update only for roads with the day to day concurrency status of each road segment subject to a real-time evaluation by the Transportation Division of the impacts of each final subdivision plat, final site development plan (SDP), and building permits. A~ ITE~ NOV ! B 2002 ,Capital Improvement Element (CIE) The transmitted GMP amendments included the following categories of amendments to the CIE, in addition to real-time roads concurrency related GOP's: Removal of Category "C" levels of service. Category "C" facilities are advisory only and are neither regulated or enforced by the BCC through implementation of the GMP Ordinance. Removal of "government buildings" and "dependent fire districts" from Category "B" facilities. The BCC gave staff direction at the 2001 AUIR meeting on December 18, 2001 to delete these facilities from the GMP. These facilities are not required to be included in the GMP by statute and fall within the administrative authority of the County Manager's implementation of annual BCC budget and policy direction. 3. Revisions to the levels of services standards for Sewer, Parks and Libraries based on BCC direction to staff at the 2001 AUIR meeting. 4. Schedule of Capital Improvements. Update of projects and revenue sources for all facilities based on direction by the BCC at the 2001 AUIR meeting. o Definition of final local development order for concurrency test. Final approved subdivision plat and final SDP were added to building permit as the concurrency test threshold development orders. o Significant impact of development proposals at the rezone and FLUE amendment were revised from 5% to 1% of population and from 5% to 1% of impacted deficient road segment capacity volume. Transportation Element The transmitted amendments included revised definitions for roads levels of service standards and approved development impact standards; removal of all references to Areas of Significant Influence (ASI); updates to the levels of service standards (LOSS) for state roads; definitions for the "constrained" and "backlogged" LOSS roads classification; and provisions to support the implementation of a mai-time "checkbook" concurrency management system for roads in the LDC. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) The transmitted amendments to the language of Policies 2.2 and 2.3 of the FLUE were proposed for internal consistency of GMP with the GOPs and implementation strategies for the concurrency management systems proposed in the CIE and Transportation Element. AGE[~ ITEM CONSIDERATIONS: The DCA issued its Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report (ORC) on September 16, 2002. The DCA identified one objection in the ORC Report. Subsequently, the BCC held a checkbook concurrency workshop on September 27, 2002. As a result of the workshop presentations and in consideration of the objection raised by DCA in the ORC report, the BCC gave the following policy direction on the implementation of the Transportation Concurrency Management System real-time checkbook methodology and modifications to the transmitted "concurrency" amendments prior to adoption: The implementation of real-time "checkbook" concurrency for roads will be delayed pending the collection of additional data to be used in the Transportation Concurrency Management System database. A review process for existing PUD's and subdivisions will be undertaken to ascertain the zoned but undeveloped projects which may be eligible for vesting for traffic impacts through an enforceable development agreement program. The vesting review is to begin with the adoption of changes to Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code. In the interim during the development of the checkbook concurrency system, the 2002 AUIR will be prepared as provided for currently in Division 3.15 LDC. Concurrency for all facilities including roads, will be established based on action and direction of the BCC upon the presentation of the 2002 AUIR in December 2002. The significant impact threshold for rezones and GMP amendments will be set at 3% of population and 3% of impacted deficient road segments as opposed to the transmittal 1% of both population and road LOS service volume. DCA "ORC" REPORT OB,IECTION: Ability to Achieve and Maintain Adopted Level of Service Standards: The proposed amendment would remove one of the options for addressing concurrency for transportation impacts. Essentially development applicants would no longer rely on road improvements listed within the first three years of the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. The County is required to have a financially feasible capital improvements plan which demonstrates that it will achieve and maintain adopted level of service (LOS) standards so that the public facility capacity needed to support growth and development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development. The proposed amendment is not supported by data and analysis demonstrating that the County will achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards given the proposed amendment. Chapter 163.3180(2)(c), Florida Statutes (FS), and Rule 9J-5.0055(1)(a) & (b), (2) (a)l., & (3) (c), and 9J-5.016(4)1., Florida Administrative Code (FAC). ~ RECOMMENDATION: The County should demonstrate that it has a financially feasible capital improvements plan to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS standards. Some of the options to consider include utilizing other concurrency mechanisms allowed by Chapter 163, FS and Rule 9J-5, FAC including adjusting the adopted level of service standards, project phasing, and developer contributions. In addition, data and analysis should be provided which show the relationship between the impacts of the proposed amendment and the improvements listed on the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. Furthermore, the analysis should indicate the impact of this amendment on other elements and objectives of the comprehensive plan, including encouraging a compact land use pattern, affordable housing and the protection natural resources. Alternatively, the County should consider not adopting the amendment. STAFF RESPONSE: Since the transmittal of the proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan (DCA No. 02-2) to initiate a renewed and more current method for the measurement of the impacts of development approvals on the roadway system, the Board of County Commissioners has resolved to approach this high impact issue in several carefully considered phases or steps: Adopt the transmitted amendments "with changes" to retain the current monitoring program for adequate public facilities (AUIR), including roads, for one year; to make new development subject to Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy (COA) approval at final subdivision plat or site development plan (SDP); to lower the threshold for traffic impact analysis at rezone or comprehensive plan amendment from 5% to 3%; to retain the inclusion of road projects in the first 3 years of the Schedule of Capital Improvements as available roads capacity; and to adopt a policy to establish the level of transportation impact vesting for previously approved planned unit developments (PUD) and subdivision developments. Prepare the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for 2002 as the concurrency determination for Category "A" public facilities, including roads, until the implementation of a real-time "checkbook" transportation concurrency management system. Adopt a financially feasible five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements with General Fund Revenues, Revenue Bonds, and Road Impact Fee increases approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 8, 2002. Adopt changes to Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code (LDC) to collect impact fees and make the funds available for facilities improvements or additions at final subdivision plat and final SDP approval; to revise the definition of Area of Significant Influence (ASI) for interim development controls on deficient roads; to define "de minimis" road impact; to adopt a threshold scale for traffic impact analysis for new development applications of "3%, 3% and 5%" for acce ~ .............. NO¥'I S 2002 8B adjacent road segments; to change the basis for peak hour traffic counts to reflect Collier County conditions. The result of these significant policy changes is the adoption of amendments which are significantly different than those which were transmitted on June 25, 2002. The County acknowledges that it lacks sufficient data on approved developments which may have vested status for roads impact and has decided to convert from the current yearly concurrency determination to the more timely checkbook system in two stages rather than make this massive conversion all at once. Without the data, which the County will collect in the interim under the revised amendments, the County believes it would be more prudent to delay the checkbook methodology implementation. At the time of transmittal, the County staff believed it was possible to collect all the data and assemble it in the transportation database by the time of adoption of the checkbook concurrency amendments. However, refinement of data sources and analysis of vested developments has proven to be time and resource intensive. Therefore, a staged implementation approach will be adopted. Since the amendments, as adopted, have been substantially revised and reduced in scope compared to the transmittal (for this interim period), many of the Department's concerns raised in it's objection and recommendation are no longer applicable and cannot be logically addressed. Detailed explanations of some if the interim measures to be implemented during this first stage of the County's transition to checkbook concurrency for roads follows: Ao Secure data on vested trips to be assigned to segments of the highway system. The delay in changing to a more timely (monthly or quarterly) update will allow the County time to collect data on "vested" trips that should be accounted for in the CMS. Current data on vested trips are incomplete and of uncertain validity. Therefore, the County will require everyone that claims to have projects vested for roadway concurrency to apply for certification of vesting during the next year. This will provide better information on vested trips to be included in the CMS as well as allow refinements to the zonal data used in the long range transportation planning models. Change the definition of an Area of Significant Impact (ASI). A significant change is proposed in the way an Area of Significant Impact (ASI) is defined. Currently when a road segment(s) is determined to be or is projected to become over capacity within three years, an ASI is to be declared by the Board of County Commissioners. For road segments within ASI's that still contain some capacity, that reserve is apportioned to new development. Within ASI's encompassing a currently deficient segment (i.e. a segment(s) having no reserve capacity) no development is allowed until the Capital Improvement Element is amended to include a project that will provide additional capacity for construction within the first three years. Currently an ASI is defined as an area within a three mile radius of any deficient or projected deficient segment of a principal arterial, within two miles for a minor arterial and one mile for a collector. The current designation of the area within an ASI is very arbitrary and would be difficult to support if challenged. If an ASI ~ ~'~-~"i~'7~ Do mo declared around a deficient segment that had no improvement scheduled for construction in the first three years of the CIE, a moratorium would be declared within a large area. In many instances, a project that would have no rational impact on the deficient link could be denied concurrency. In order to correct this problem, an ASI is to be defined as any deficient link directly accessed by a proposed project. Require payment of impact fees upon approval of a final plat, final site development plan or building permit and allow fees to be used immediately. Currently many SDPs or final residential plats take a waver on impact fees and pay them at building permit. This does not provide funds in time to design and acquire right of way to have a project scheduled for construction concurrent with impacts of the development. Change basis of peak hour calculation. The 100th highest hour is typically used as the basis of the peak season peak hour in Florida. However, Rule 9J-5.007(3)(c)1 only requires "Establishment of level of service standards at peak hour...". The rule does not mandate peak season, peak hour. Jurisdictions around the state use various definitions for peak hour. It is accepted practice to use something around the 250th highest hour as a basis for the average or non-peak season peak hour. Rather than confuse the public with arcane engineering terms, the County has decided that the basis of the peak hour will be derived from the annual average omitting the two highest peak months of February and March. This results in the peak hour basis being approximately the 248th highest hour. If the adopted LOS is maintained throughout the "non-peak" ten months, the adopted LOS may be exceeded during February and March. However, the Board felt that it was not an appropriate use of public funds to attempt to maintain LOS D throughout the peak season. As in many strongly seasonal communities, some congestion is expected and tolerated in the at peak of the peak season, the resulting use of the peak season peak hour for concurrency would not be an appropriate use of public funds. Change significant impact threshold. Under the current AUIR concurrency management system, developers are asked to model if the impact of their project is over 5% of the adopted LOS service volume on any link The numbers are used to refine gross traffic data and do not have any effect because there is no concurrency program other than the AUIR/ASI system. The transmitted amendments changed the significant impact threshold for the area to be covered for modeling in impact analyses from 5% of the adopted LOS across the board; to 1% for links directly accessed by the proposed project; 3% for the next links and 5% for subsequent segments. The County now wants to revise this to 3%, 3%, and 5% to reduce the cost of analyses to minor projects. And to allow better data to be generated, ftowever, it will help better refine data for traffic engineering purposes and will assist staff in discussions of PUD's, which are discretionary rezonings approved by the BCC. AGE~A ITEM NOV I 9 ZOO2 FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of these amendments will be followed by the implementation of a process to collect and appropriate impact fees for the expansion or addition of Category "A" public facilities to accommodate new development approvals at the time of final site development plan (SDP) or final subdivision plat approval. Impact fees are currently paid at the time of building permit pickup. Additional staff and operating expenses may be required within the Transportation Services Division and the Community Development & Environmental Services Division. Increases to the fee schedules for the processing of applications for development orders and Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy (COA) may be proposed in conjunction with the adoption of amendments to the Land Development Code (LDC) for implementation of these amendments. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: These amendments will support the adoption of changes to the County's concurrency management system methodology. Rule 9J- 5.0055 F.A.C. requires the County to adopt a concurrency management system to implement the requirements of the Growth Management Act, Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., to provide for the availability of adequate public facilities to serve new development concurrent with the impacts of new development approvals. ADDITIONAL NOTES: Since the transmittal of these amendments (DCA No. 02-2), there has been extensive editing and redrafting of both the CIE and the Transportation Element. As a result, the CIE, as proposed for adoption, has been formatted in ~ ~ and single underline to provide a readable document. The Transportation Element, as proposed for adoption, has been formatted in o~ ~4~,~ ~, ..... ~, .... ~, ............... ~,, and single underline to indicate the transmitted changes and in double underline and dotfl~ ~*~:~'-*~ ..... *' to indicate changes since the transmittal proposed for adoption. Due to the size of the documents package, the ordinance and amended element pages only are included with this Executive Summary. Complete notebooks will be delivered to the BCC after the CCPC hearing of November 7, 2002. CCPC RECOMMENDATION: The Collier County Planning Commission was scheduled to review these amendments at an advertised public hearing on October 17, 2002. The hearing was continued to the CCPC meeting of November 7, 2002. This Executive Summary agenda package is being forwarded to the Board prior to the CCPC meeting. Staff will convey the CCPC recommendations of November 7, 2002 by a supplement to this Executive Summary and as part of the presentation of these amendments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board review and adopt the 2002 Second Cycle Growth Management Plan Amendments (DCA No. 02-2). 7 PREPARED BY: ate: Stan Litsinger, Comprehensive Planning Manager REVIEWED B Y 5~-~t-~_ 4-~ ~~ Date: Margare~uerstle, AICP Planning Services Director APPROVED BY: ~~1:~~ Date: ?r/~7~ /j~eph K. Sgh/rr/itt,~Administra/tor //community Development & Environmental Services NOV ! ~ 8 8B Memorandum To: Board of County Commissioners From: Stan Litsinger, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Manager Date: November 12, 2002 Subject: Collier County Planning Commission Recommendations on GMP Amendments DCA No. 02-2. The CCPC heard staff presentations and received public comment on November 7, 2002, and forwarded the GMP amendments, DCA No. 02-2, to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for adoption with staff recommended page changes as follows: 1) 2) Transportation Element, page 4, a clarification reference to the Schedule of Capital Improvement. Transportation Element, page 8, a clarification reference to include future updates of the PTOP. 3) Transportation Element, page 13, a correction of reference to 110% volume to read 10%. 4) Transportation Element, page 19, additional clarification language was added, as well as a time frame, to traffic analysis thresholds a, b, and c in Policy 5.1. New language has been crafted to capture the intent of the BCC policy direction to conduct a Traffic Impact Vesting Affirmation Review in Policy 5.3. The CCPC also directed staff to research the question if a Level of Service should be adopted in Policy 1.1.5, page CIE-6, of the Capital Improvement Element for the Immokalee Water and Sewer District. Staff has confirmed that the Immokalee Water and Sewer District is an Independent Private Sector system which is not regulated by Collier County. Staff does not recommend the adoption of a specific LOS for the Immokalee Water and Sewer District other than the standards set out in Policy 1.2.1 of the Sewer Sub-Element, which further incorporates the standards set forth in Chapter 10D-6, Florida Administrative Code (FAC). Staff has also modified the revenues calculation for roads on the schedule, "Costs & Revenues By Type of Public Facility", appearing on CIE pages 49 and 50, to clarify the revenue stream over the five year planning period from General Fund Transfers. Cc: James V. Mudd, P.E. County Manager Joseph K. Schmitt, CD&ES Administrator Norm Feder, AICP, Transportation Administrator Margaret Wuerstle, AICP, Planning Director Marjorie Student, Asst. County Attorney SL/mk\f: bccadoptioncycle Comprehensive Planning Services Section JEB BUSH Governor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home' 8B STEVEN M. SEIBERT Secretary September 16, 2002 The Honorable Jim Coletta Chairman, Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Chairman Coletta: The Department has completed its review of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment for Collier (DCA No. 02-2), which was received on July 5, 2002. Based on Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S)., we have prepared the attached report which outlines our findings concerning the amendment. It is particularly important that the County address the "objections" set forth in our review report so that these issues can be successfully resolved prior to adoption. We have also included a copy of local, regional and state agency comments for your consideration. Within the next 60 days, the County should act by choosing to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendment. For your assistance, our report outlines procedures for final adoption and transmittal. The proposed amendment involves changes to the Capital Improvements Element, Transportation Element, and Future Land Use Element, all of which are intended to enable the implementation of a new concurrency management system. The Department appreciates Collier County's initiative to address traffic problems. However, we are concerned that the approach presented in the amendment, on its own, may not be feasible. It would be more appropriate and beneficial for the County to consider a comprehensive approach to the problem including reevaluating the adopted level of service standards, land uses strategies, and utilizing other options provided by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX:~ 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fl.us CRIIICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway. Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee. FL 32399-2100 rallahassee. FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (305) 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 (850) 413-9969 (850) 488-7956 JEB BUSH Governor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home' 8B STEVEN M. SEIBERT Secretary The Honorable Jim Coletta September 16, 2002 Page Three I believe the concerns outlined in our report can be resolved. We are available to work with your staff to develop an approach that will work for the County. If you or your staff have any questions, or if we maybe of further assistance, please contact Bernard O. Piawah, Senior Planner, at (850) 922-1810. Sincerely, H. E. "Sonny" Timmerman Director, Division of Community Planning HET~p Enclosures: Review Agency Comments CC: Mr. David Burr, Acting Director, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Mr. David Weeks, Collier County Planning Department Ms. Nancy Linnan, Esquire, Carlton Fields 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STALE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENr 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (305) 289-2402 (850) 48B-2356 (B50) 413-9969 (850) 488-7956 TRANSMITTAL PROCEDURES Upon receipt of this letter, Collier County has 60 days in which to adopt, adopt with changes, or determine not to adopt the proposed comprehensive plan amendment. The process for adoption of local comprehensive plan is outlined in Section 163.3184, F.S., and Rule 9J-11.011, F.A.C. Within ten working days of the date of adoption, County must submit the following to the Department: Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendment; A copy of the adoption ordinance; A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the plan, and pursuant to Rule 9J-11.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted plan directly to the Executive Director of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council. Please be advised that the Florida Legislature amended Section 163.3184(8)(b), F.S., requiring the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by the law to furnish to the Department the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information. This list is to be submitted at the time of transmittal of the adopted amendment. As discussed in our letter sent to you on May 25,2001, outlining the changes to Section 163.3184(8)(b), F.S., which were effective July 1, 2001, and providing a model sign-in information sheet, please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted plan for compliance review. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT COLLIER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 02-2 September 16, 2002 Division of Community Planning Bureau of Local Planning This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J- 11.010, F.A.C. 8B INTRODUCTION The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the Department's review of Collier County's proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.). The objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Codes (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163, Part 11, F.S. The objections include a recommendation of an approach that might be taken to address the cited objection. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objections may have initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. If there is a difference between the Department's objection and the external agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedence. The County should address each of these objections when the plan is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections which are not addressed may result in a determination that the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have raised an objection regarding missing data and analysis items which the County considers not applicable to its amendment. If that is the case, a statement justifying its non-applicability pursuant to Rule 9J-5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non-applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed. The comments which follow the objections and recommendations are advisory in nature. Comments will not form bases of a determination of non-compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar, organization, mapping, and reader comprehension. Appended to the back of the Department' s report are the comment letters from the other state review agencies and other agencies, organizations and individuals. These comments are advisory to the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections" heading in this report. OBJECTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 02-2 COLLIER COUNTY I. CONSISTENCY WITH RULE 9J-5., FAC., & CHAPTER 163., F.S. The amendment proposed by Collier County involves changes to the Capital Improvements Element (CIE), Transportation Element, and Future Land Use Element, all of which are intended to enable the implementation of a new concurrency management system (CMS). The Department has identified the following objection which needs to be addressed in order to achieve compliance: Objection: Ability to Achieve and Maintain Adopted Level of Service Standards: The proposed amendment would remove one of the options for addressing concurrency for transportation impacts. Essentially development applicants would no longer rely on road improvements listed within the first three years of the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. The County is required to have a financially feasible capital improvements plan which demonstrates that it will achieve and maintain adopted level of service (LOS) standards so that the public facility capacity needed to support growth and development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development. The proposed amendment is not supported by data and analysis demonstrating that the County will achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards given the proposed amendment. Chapter 163.3180(2)(c), Florida Statutes (FS), and Rule9J-5.0055(1)(a) & (b), (2)(a)1., & (3)(c), and 9J-5.016(4)1., Florida Administrative Code (FAC). Recommendation: The County should demonstrate that it has a financially feasible capital improvements plan to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS standards. Some of the options to consider include utilizing other concurrency mechanisms allowed by Chapter 163, FS and Rule 9J-5, FAC including adjusting the adopted level of service standards, project phasing, and developer contributions. In addition, data and analysis should be provided which show the relationship between the impacts of the proposed amendment and the improvements listed on the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvement. Furthermore, the analysis should indicate the impact of this amendment on other elements and objectives of the comprehensive plan, including encouraging a compact land use pattern, affordable housing and the protection natural resources. Alternatively, the County should consider not adopting the amendment. II. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed amendments are not consistent with the State Comprehensive plan including the following goals and policies (163.3177(9):) Public Facilities Goal (18)(a) and Policies (b)l., & 2.; regarding the provision of public facilities; Recommendation: Revise the proposed amendment as indicated in the objections and recommendations of this report in order to be consistent with the above goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan. 2 MEMORANDUM 8B TO: FROM: DATE: RE: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & DIVISION PLANNING SERVICES PLANNING SECTION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPT., COMPREHENSIVE MAY 29, 2OO2 RECOMMENDATION THAT THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING_ COMMISSION REVIEW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT; AND FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FORWARD TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. OBJECTIVE: To initiate the review process for the County's statutorily permitted second 2002 Growth Management Plan Amendment Cycle. CONSIDERATIONS: In response to policy direction by the BCC to the County Manager, finalized on May 14, 2002, staff has drafted proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plan to support adoption of a new Transportation Concurrency Management System into the Land Development Code (LDC). This transmittal public hearing before the CCPC is step 4 (ID #4) on the attached "2002 Second GMP/LDC Amendment Cycle (Concurrency)." These proposed amendments would begin the process of transition from a once a year concurrency determination for roads to a real time "checkbook" methodology. The traffic impact of each local development order will be analyzed and applied to all impacted road segments prior to final approval. The Annual Update Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR) will continue to be the concurrency status notification to the BCC for Water, Sewer, Drainage, Solid Waste and Parks. Capacity and allocations of each facility, except roads, will be monitored by the departments responsible for the management and planning for these facilities during the twelve months following the policy direction by the BCC on needed projects and funding identified in the AUIR. However, the AUIR will include a "checkbook balancing" update only for roads with the day to day concurrency status of each road segment subject to a real time evaluation by the Transportation Division of the impacts of each SDP, final plat and building permit. 8B Capital Improvement Element (CIE) The transmitted GMP amendments include the following categories of amendments to the CIE, in addition to real time roads concurrency related GOP's: Removal of Category "C" levels of service. Category "C" facilities are advisory only and are neither regulated or enforced by the BCC through implementation of the GMP Ordinance. Removal of "government buildings" and "dependent fire districts" from Category "B" facilities. The BCC gave staff direction at the 2001 AUIR meeting on December 18, 2001 to delete these facilities from the GMP. These facilities are not required to be included in the GMP by statute and fall within the administrative authority of the County Manager's implementation of annual BCC budget and policy direction. 3. Revisions to the levels of services standards for Sewer, Parks and Libraries based on BCC direction to staff at the 2001 AUIR meeting. 4. Schedule of Capital Improvements. Update of projects and revenue sources for all facilities based on direction by the BCC at the 2001 AUIR meeting. Definition of final local development order for concurrency test. Final approved subdivision plat and final SDP have been added to building permit as the concurrency test threshold development orders. Significant impact of development proposals at the rezone and FLUE amendment were revised from 5% to 1% of population and from 5% to 1% of impacted deficient road segment capacity volume. Transportation Element The transmitted amendments include revised definitions for roads levels of service standards and approved development impact standards; removal of all references to Areas of Significant Influence (ASI); updates to the levels of service standards (LOSS) for state roads; definitions for the "constrained" and "backlogged" LOSS roads classification; and provisions to support the implementation of a real time "checkbook" concurrency management system for roads in the LDC. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) The transmitted amendments to the language of Policies 2.2 and 2.3 of the FLUE are proposed for internal consistency of GMP with the GOPs and implementation strategies for the concurrency management systems proposed in the CIE and Transportation Element. CONSIDERATIONS: The DCA issued its Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report (ORC) on September 16, 2002. The DCA identified one objection in the ORC Report. Subsequently, the BCC held a checkbook concurrency workshop on September 27, 2002. As a result of the workshop presentations and in consideration of the objection raised by DCA in the ORC report, the BCC gave the following policy 2 direction on the implementation of the Transportation Concurrency Management System real-time checkbook methodology and modifications to the transmitted "concurrency" amendment prior to adoption: The implementation of real-time "checkbook" concurrency for roads will be delayed until October 2003 to facilitate additional data collection to be used in the Transportation Concurrency Management System database. A review process for existing PUD's and subdivisions will be undertaken to ascertain the zoned but undeveloped projects which may be eligible for vesting for traffic impacts through an enforceable development agreement program. The vesting review is to begin with the adoption of changes to Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code. In the interim during the development of the checkbook concurrency system, the 2002 AUIR will be prepared as provided for currently in Division 3.15 LDC. Concurrency for all facilities including roads, will be established based on action and direction of the BCC upon the presentation of the 2002 AUIR in December 2002. The significant impact threshold for rezones and GMP amendments will be set at 3% of population and 3% of impacted deficient road segments as opposed to the transmittal 1% of both population and road LOS service volume. DCA "ORC" REPORT OBJECTION: Ability to Achieve and Maintain Adopted Level of Service Standards: The proposed amendment would remove one of the options for addressing concurrency for transportation impacts. Essentially development applicants would no longer rely on road improvements listed within the first three years of the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. The County is required to have a financially feasible capital improvements plan which demonstrates that it will achieve and maintain adopted level of service (LOS) standards so that the public facility capacity needed to support growth and development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development. The proposed amendment is not supported by data and analysis demonstrating that the County will achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards given the proposed amendment. Chapter 163.3180(2)(c), Florida Statutes (FS), and Rule 9J-5.0055(1)(a) & (b), (2) (a)l., & (3) (c), and 9J-5.016(4)1., Florida Administrative Code (FAC). RECOMMENDATION: The County should demonstrate that it has a financially feasible capital improvements plan to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS standards. Some of the options to consider include utilizing other concurrency mechanisms allowed by Chapter 163, FS and Rule 9J-5, FAC including adjusting the adopted level of service standards, project phasing, and developer contributions. In addition, data and analysis should be provided which show the relationship between the impacts of the proposed amendment and the improvements listed on the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. Furthermore, the analysis should indicate the impact of this amendment on other elements and objectives of the comprehensive plan, including encouraging a compact land use pattern, affordable housing and the protection natural resources. Alternatively, the County should consider not adopting the amendment. STAFF RESPONSE: Since the transmittal of the proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan (DCA No. 02-02) to initiate a renewed and more current method for the measurement of the impacts of development approvals on the roadway system, the Board of County Commissioners has resolved to approach this high impact issue in several carefully considered phases or steps: Adopt the transmitted amendments "with changes" to retain the current monitoring program for adequate public facilities (AUIR), including roads, for one year; to make new development subject to Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy (COA) approval at final subdivision plat or site development plan (SDP); to lower the threshold for traffic impact analysis at rezone or comprehensive plan amendment from 5% to 3%; to retain the inclusion of road projects in the first 3 years of the Schedule of Capital Improvements as available roads capacity; and to adopt a policy to establish the level of transportation impact vesting for previously approved planned unit developments (PUD) and subdivision developments. Prepare the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for 2002 as the concurrency determination for Category "A" public facilities, including roads, until the implementation of a real time "checkbook" transportation concurrency management system in October 2003. Adopt a financially feasible five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements with Revenue Bonds, and Road Impact Fee increases approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 8, 2002. Adopt changes to Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code (LDC) to collect impact fees and make the funds available for facilities improvements or additions at final subdivision plat and final SDP approval; to revise the definition of Area of Significant Influence (ASI) for interim development controls on deficient roads; to define "de minimis" road impact; to adopt a threshold scale for traffic impact analysis for new development applications of "3%, 3% and 5%" for accessed and adjacent road segments; to change the basis for peak hour traffic counts to reflect Collier County conditions. The result of these significant policy changes is the adoption of amendments which are significantly different than those which were transmitted on June 25, 2002. The County acknowledges that it lacks sufficient data on approved developments that may have vested ,status for roads impact and has decided to convert from the current yearly concurrency determination to the more timely checkbook system in two stages rather than make this massive conversion all at once. Without the data, which the County will collect in the interim under the revised amendments, the County believes it would be more prudent to delay the checkbook methodology for a year. At the time of transmittal, the County staff believed it was possible to collect all the data and assemble it in the transportation database by the time of adoption of the checkbook concurrency amendments. However, refinement of data sources and analysis of vested developments has proven to be time and resource intensive. Therefore, a staged implementation approach will be adopted. Since the amendments, as adopted, have been substantially revised and reduced in scope compared to the transmittal (for this interim period), many of the Department's concerns raised in it's objection and recommendation are no longer applicable and cannot be logically addressed. 4 Detailed explanations of some if the interim measures to be implemented during this first stage of the County's transition to checkbook concurrency for roads follows: Secure data on vested trips to be assigned to segments of the highway system. The delay in changing to a more timely (monthly or quarterly) update will allow the County time to collect data on "vested" trips that should be accounted for in the CMS. Current data on vested trips are incomplete and of uncertain validity. Therefore, the County will require everyone that claims to have projects vested for roadway concurrency to apply for certification of vesting during the next year. This will provide better information on vested trips to be included in the CMS as well as allow refinements to the zonal data used in the long range transportation planning models. Bo Change the definition of an Area of Significant Impact (ASI). A significant change is proposed in the way an Area of Significant Impact (ASI) is defined. Currently when a road segment(s) is determined to be or is projected to become over capacity within three years, an ASI is to be declared by the Board of County Commissioners. For road segments within ASI's that still contain some capacity, that reserve is apportioned to new development. Within ASI's encompassing a currently deficient segment (i.e. a segment(s) having no reserve capacity) no development is allowed until the Capital Improvement Element is amended to include a project that will provide additional capacity for construction within the first three years. Currently an ASI is defined as an area within a three mile radius of any deficient or projected deficient segment of a principal arterial, within two miles for a minor arterial and one mile for a collector. The current designation of the area within an ASI is very arbitrary and would be difficult to support if challenged. If an ASI were declared around a deficient segment that had no improvement scheduled for construction in the first three years of the CIE, a moratorium would be declared within a large area. In many instances, a project that would have no rational impact on the deficient link could be denied concurrency. In order to correct this problem, an ASI is to be defined as any deficient link directly accessed by a proposed project. Co Require payment of impact fees upon approval of a final plat, final site development plan or building permit and allow fees to be used immediately. Currently many SDPs or final residential plats take a waiver on impact fees and pay them at building permit. This does not provide funds in time to design and acquire right of way to have a project scheduled for construction concurrent with impacts of the development. Do Change basis of peak hour calculation. The 100th highest hour is typically used as the basis of the peak season peak hour in Florida. However, Rule 9J-5.007(3)(c)1 only requires "Establishment of level of service standards at peak hour...". The rule does not mandate peak season, peak hour. Jurisdictions around the state use various definitions for peak hour. It is accepted practice to use something around the 250th highest hour as a basis for the average or non-peak season peak hour. Rather than confuse the public with arcane engineering terms, the County has decided that the basis of the peak hour will be derived from the annual average omitting the two highest peak months of February and March. This results in the peak hour basis being approximately the 248th highest hour. If the adopted LOS is maintained peak of the peak season, the resulting use of the peak season peak hour for concurrency would not be an appropriate use of public funds. Chanqe si.qnificant impact threshold. Under the current AUIR concurrency management system, developers are asked to model if the impact of their project is over 5% of the adopted LOS service volume on any link The numbers are used to refine gross traffic data and do not have any effect because there is no concurrency program other than the AUIR/ASI system. The transmitted amendments changed the significant impact threshold for the area to be covered for modeling in impact analyses from 5% of the adopted LOS across the board; to 1% for links directly accessed by the proposed project; 3% for the next links and 5% for subsequent segments. The County now wants to revise this to 3%, 3%, and 5% to reduce the cost of analyses to minor projects. And to allow better data to be generated. However, it will help better refine data for traffic engineering purposes and will assist staff in discussions of PUD's, which are discretionary rezonings approved by the BCC. ADDITIONAL NOTES: Since the transmittal of these amendments (DCA No. 02-02), _ there has been extensive editing and redrafting of both the CIE and the Transportation Element. As a result, the CIE, as proposed for adoption, has been formatted inv,,"~""~",~,.. sir!kc thrcuGh and sin,qle underline to provide a readable document. The Transportation Element, as proposed for adoption, has been formatted in sin.~Ic~.,"*-"~'",,.v *",, ,, ..... ~,~', and single underline to indicate the transmitted changes and in do~lble underline and de~ ~ to indicate changes since the transmittal proposed for adoption. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward the 2002 Second Cycle GMP amendments (DCA No. 02-02), with the proposed changes, to the BCC with a recommendation for adoption. PREP/~RED BY: STA~ LITSINGER, ER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION REVIEWED BY: I /') / DON SCOTT, DIRECTOR TRANSPORTATION/PLANNING REVIEWED BY: MARGAR,L~I' WUEF~TLE, AIOP, DIRECTOR PLANNIN~ SERVICES APPROVED BY: ~EP~ATOR DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: 8B \ COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: KENNETH ABERNATHY, CHAIRMAN Memorandum 8B It To: From: Date: Subject: Board of County Commissioners Marcia R. Kendall, Planning Technician November 12, 2002 Growth Management Plan Concurrency Adoption Amendments Advertisement Due to the short time frame, we have yet to receive the "Certified Advertisement" from Naples Daily News, which ran in the paper on November 8 & 13, 2002. Therefore, I have enclosed a copy of the (uncertified) advertisement for review. As soon as the "Certified Ad" is received, it will be placed in this notebook, prior to transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs. Thank you. Cc: Stan Litsinger, AICP Comprehensive Planning Manager mk/f:\compplan/rural lands Comprehensive Planning Services Section iNTENT TO! NSIDERORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, November 19, 2002 in the County Commissioners Boardroom,' 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida the Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing to consider the adoption of the folloWing County. OrdinanCe, Amendments to the' Collier County Growth Management Plan. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.~M. The T~i~ e of the proposed, ordinance, is aSoRDiNANCE.No.fOIIOwS: 02- ' ~' 8 . AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05,'AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, AND THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The purpose Of the hearing is to consider the Adoption of the Future Land Use Element, Capital Improvement Element and Transportation ~Element to the Growth Management Plan in respons~ to the Objections, Comments and Recommendations Report of the Department of Community Affairs (DCA)', according to the Procedures and Criteria outlined in Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes. All interested parties ara invited to appear and be heard..Copies of the proposed Growth Management .Plan Amendments are available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, 4th Floor, Administration Building, County Government Center, East Naples, Florida; ahd at Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to November 19, 2002, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any deCision'made by the Board .of County Commissioners with respect tO any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By:/s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Collier C°untU Florida No. 99706357 November 8~ 13~ 2002 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daily Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that ~hey serve as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising, being a PUBLIC NOTICE in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE was published in said newspaper 1 t/me(s) in the issue on October 6, 2002 Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for ( Signature of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me 28a d~ of Qctober, 2002 (~i~-namre of notary &~ ~ My Commission DD058336 :"e?%=~ bxp!~'ss September 11,2005 81t FINANCE DEPT RECEIVED 06T 3 1 2002 Memorandum To: From: Date: Subject: Collier County Planning Commission Marcia R. Kendall, Planning Technician October 10, 2002 Growth Management Plan Concurrency Adoption Amendments Advertisement Due to the short time frame, we have yet to receive the "Certified Advertisement" from Naples Daily News, which ran in the paper on October 6, 2002. Therefore, I have enclosed a copy of the (uncertified) advertisement for review. As soon as the "Certified Ad" is received, it will be placed in this notebook, prior to the BCC Meeting being held on October 22, 2002. Thank you. Cc: Stan Litsinger, AICP Comprehensive Planning Manager mk/f:\compplan/rural lands Comprehensive Planning Services Section NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public headng will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission on Thursday, October 17, 2002 at 8:30 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, County Government Center, East Nap[es, Florida, 34112. r~(~tion ~i The purpose of the hearing is to consider a racom or{ amendments to the Future Land Use Element, Capital Improvement Element and Transportion Element of the Growth Management Plan, and to forward consideration for adoption by the Board of County Commissioners. The Title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 02 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, AND THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; · AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendments are available for inspection at the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Section.(239-403-2300) Written comments filed with the Comprehensive Planning Section prior to October 17, 2002, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Kenneth Abernathy, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission No. 99642562 October 672002 ORDINANCE NO. 02- ~ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, AND THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et.seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187; Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Collier County did submit this Growth Management Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review on July 3, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs did review and issue its Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report (ORC) to the Future Land Use Element, Capital Improvement Element and Transportation Element amendments to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted the same in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 60 days from receipt of this ORC Report from the Department of Community Affairs, to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the Future Land Use Element, Capital Improvement Element, and the Transportation Element amendments to the Growth Management Plan on November 12, 2002; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of these amendments to the Future Land Use Element, Capital Improvement Element and the Transportation Element, including the following: the Collier County staff report; and the other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meetings of the Collier County Planning Commission held October 17, 2002, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on November 12, 2002; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: _SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, CAPFFAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, AND TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts these amendments to the Future Land Use Element, Capital Improvement Element and the Transportation Element in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The amendments are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated by reference herein. .SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. _SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of these amendments shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendments in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders or development permits dependent on these amendments may be issued or land uses dependent on these amendments commence before they have become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, these amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which Resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3rd Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the County Commissioners of Collier County this day of 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Marjorie M. Student, Assistant County Attorney COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 8B CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Prepared By Collier County Planning Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT SYMBOL DATE AMENDED (I) February 23, 1999 (11) May 9, 2000 ORDINANCE NO. Ordinance No. 99-14 Ordinance No. 2000-31 Indicates adopted portion Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. Words ctruckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions * III. IV. V. VI. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: Roads Projects Drainage Projects EMS Projects Jail Projects Library Buildings Projects Library Collection Government Buildings Projects Parks Projects Water Projects Sewer Projects Landfill Projects COST AND REVENUES PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION ANALYSIS (Support Documents) Public Facility Requirements Capital Improvements Projects Capital Improvement Financing Capacity Collier County School Board Capital Improvement Program Timing & Location of Capital improvements: Current Local Practices Financing Plan Collier County Fifth Annual Update & Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities Adopted portions PaRe CIE -I CIE - 2 CIE - 17 CIE - 26 CIE - 27 CIE - 29 CIE - 30 CIE - 31 CIE - 32 CIE - 33 CIE - 36 CIE - 42 CIE - 46 CIE - 47 CIE - 49 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G ± Words struckthrc'Jgh are deletions - Words underlined are additions I. INTRODUCTION In 1985 and 1986 the Florida Legislature significantly strengthened the requirements for county and city comprehensive plans. One of the provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act is the requirement that the comprehensive plan must contain a Capital Improvement Element to "... consider the needs for and location of public facilities ..." (Section 163.3177(3), Florida Statutes). The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) must identify public facilities that will be required during the next five years, including the cost of the facilities, and the sources of revenue that will be used to fund the facilities. One of the specific requirements of the legislation states that the public facilities that are contained in the CIE must be based on "standards to ensure the availability of public facilities and the adequacy of those facilities including acceptable levels of service." The administrative regulation that implements the statutes defines the phrase "level of service" as "... an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by ... a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility." (Section 9J-5.003 (41), Florida Administrative Code). CIE- 1 Words °* ....~'*~- ..... ~- ............. u,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT GOALS~ OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CONCURRENT WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN OR EXCEED ADOPTED STANDARDS FOR LEVELS OF SERVICE. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Identify and define types of public facilities for which the County is responsible, establish standards for levels of service for each such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities are needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. Policy 1.1.1: The County shall establish standards for levels of service for thrcc two categories of public facilities, as follows: Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in other elements of this comprehensive plan, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities. The standards for levels of service of Category A County provided public facilities shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the County's annual budget, and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan. The standards for levels of service of Category A facilities which are not County provided shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan, but shall not apply to the County's annual budget. Category B public facilities are facilities for the County's library, jail, and emergency medical services, '-'+~' ............ * ~'''"~; ..... ~ '~'p""'~""+ f~"" dlctdctc. The standards for levels of service of Category B public facilities shall apply to the County's annual budget, but not apply to development orders issued by the County. Public facilities shall include land, structures, the initial furnishings and equipment (including ambulances, fire apparatus, and library collection materials), design, permitting, and construction costs. Other "capital" costs, such as motor vehicles and motorized equipment, computers and office equipment, office furnishings, and small tools are considered in the County's annual budget, but such items are not "public facilities" for the purposes of the Growth Management Plan, or the issuance of development orders. CIE- 2 Words ctr'.-'ckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions Policy 1.1.2: The quantity of public facilities that is needed to eliminate existing deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall be determined for each public facility by the following calculation: Q=(SxD)-I. Where Q is the quantity of public facility needed, S is the standard for level of service, D is the demand, such as the population, and I is the inventory of existing facilities. The calculation will be used for existing demand in order to determine existing deficiencies. The calculation will be used for projected demand in order to determine needs of future growth. The estimates of projected demand will account for demand that is likely to occur from previously issued development orders as well as future growth. (11) The County Commission will review all rezone requests and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall County-Wide density or intensity of permissible development with consideration of their impact on both the variable "D" in the formula Q = (S x D) - I, and the overall roadway system. The County Commission shall not approve any such rezone request or FLUE amendment that significantly impacts either: (1) a deficient roadway segment al''.`'`'4 ....... ,.,m.: .......... , ......... p,..~.,., i ....,..,I ~,~.., ....~""":"".. or; (2) the BEBR high range growth rate population projections through the year_2000 2006, and then the BEBR medium range growth rate thereafter, for the variable "D", unless one er-mere of the following simultaneously occurs: Specific mitigating stipulations are approved in conjunction with the rezone to restore or maintain the Level of Service on the impacted roadway segment; (11) The adopted population standard used for calculation of "Q" in the formula Q = (S x D) - I is amended based on appropriate data and analysis; The Schedule of Capital Improvements is updated to include any necessary projects that would support the additional public facility demand(s) created by the rezone or amendment to the Future Land Use Element. Significant impact is hereby defined for Section B of this Policy as generating potential for increased County-Wide population greater than 5% 3% of the BEBR high range population projections for Parks, Solid Waste, Water, Sewer and Drainage facilities, or as generating a volume of traffic equal to or greater than 5% 3%of the adopted LOS standard service volume ' .... i ,.~ ~,..,,:..,. r.......~. ~. ....... , .... of an impacted roadway (11) There are three circumstances in which the standards for levels of service are not the exclusive determinant of need for a public facility: 1. Calculated needs for public facilities in coastal high hazard areas are subject to all limits and conditions in the Conservation and Coastal Management and Future Land Use Elements of this Growth Management Plan. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and repair, remodeling and renovation, will be determined by the Board of County Commissioners upon the recommendation of the County Admi~ictr~tcr Manager. CIE- 3 Words struckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions Public facilities that provide levels of service in excess of the standards adopted in this Growth Management Plan may be constructed or acquired at any time as long as the following conditions are met: the facility does not make financially unfeasible any public facility of the same type that is needed to achieve or maintain the standards for levels of service adopted in this Growth Management Plan, and the facility does not contradict, limit or substantially change the goals, objectives and policies of any element of this Growth Management Plan. Any public facility that is determined to be needed as a result of any of the factors listed in Section B and D of this Policy shall be included in the regular Schedule of Capital Improvements contained in this Capital Improvement Element. All capital improvement projects for such public facilities shall be approved in the same manner as the projects that are identified according to the quantitative analysis described in Section A of this policy. Policy 1.1,3: The determination of location of improvements to expand public facilities will take into consideration the projected growth patterns as identified in the County's annual population projections. Where applicable, public facility improvements will be coordinated with the capital facility plans of any other governmental entity providing public facilities within Collier County. Policy 1,1.4: Public facility improvements within a category are to be considered in the following order or priority: Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service. B. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies in levels of service. New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years, as updated by the annual review of the Capital Improvement Element. In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the capital improvements will be scheduled in the following priority order to serve: 1. previously approved development orders permitting redevelopment, 2. previously approved development orders permitting new development, 3. new development orders permitting redevelopment, and 4. new development orders permitting new developments. Eo Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility. New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years by either: 1. providing excess public facility capacity that may be needed by future growth beyond the next five fiscal years, or providing higher quality public facilities than are contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for such facilities. CIE- 4 Words ctruc~throuGh are deletions - Words underlined are additions 8 B ' 1 Policy 1.1.5: The standard~ for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: Cate.qory A Public Facilities Arterial and collector roads, including state highways not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System FIHS) A1 Cc'.' nty Roadways: A1.1 "' .... *" Aarterials and collector roads: Level of Service as indicated .... below on the basis of peak hour,-pe~,k-sea, se~ traffic volume: Level of Service "E" on the following designated roads: Roads Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road US 41 From - To Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Airport-Pulling Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway to US 41 ^; .... + D.,IH.~ D~.-,~I US41 to ~ '~5 Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard to Old US 41 Airport-Pulling Road Airport-Pulling Road Davis Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Golden Gate Parkway Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Airport-Pulling Road US 41 to Airport-Pullin,q Road Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road US 41 to Gulfshore Drive A1.2 (I))(11) A2 Level of Service "D" peak hourT~,v-,.'"'"""' ~w"~'"cc",, on all other County and State (not on the FIHS) arterial and collector roadsT, k ......... any "'-"*;'-"' '''~ -",'~ ......... *"' '"* ' .... ' of · -.~ e.....;,... ,,c,, ;,..-..,,~.. + ...... ~,~.. ,r... r- .... , ..... ;,k +i...., .... ....+""" ~ .... ...~ "~ Scr;!cc ,,~,,,.. ~':,' State and Federal Roads: Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for state roads with the exception of those on the Florida Intrastate Hi.qhway System (FIHS). In Collier County FDOT sets and maintains the LOS for 1-75. The standards for 1-75 are as follows: A3 1-75 'JS 'tl EXISTING TRANSITIONING RURAL AREA URBANIZED AREA URBANIZED AREA B C C DC D D D D D D D D D County Surface Water Management Systems: CIE- 5 Words °* ....~,,k ..... ~ ............. ~,, are deletions- Words underlined are additions (I)(11) A3.1 A3.2 (I) A4 A4.1 A4.2 A4.3 (I) A5 A5.1 A5.2 A5.3 (11) A6 A6.1 A6.2 A7 A7.1 A7.2 A7.3 Category B B1 B2 B3 B4 ,8B Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74-50 and 90-10. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing levels of service identified (by design storm return frequency event) by the completed portions of the Water Management Master Plan as listed in the Drainage/Water Management Subelement of the Public Facilities Element. County Potable Water Systems: County systems County Water District - 185 gallons per capita per day Goodland Water District - 163 gallons per capita per day City of Naples = 163 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area City of Everglades - 163 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area Private potable water systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.3.1 of the Potable Water Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. County Sanitary Sewer Systems: County systems: North Sewer Service Area = 145 gallons per capita per day South Sewer Service Area = !2! 100 gallons per capita per day City of Naples = 121 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area Private sanitary sewer systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.2.1 of the Sanitary Sewer Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities: Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years Ten years of permittable capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years. County Parks and Recreation Facilities: Regional Park land = 2.9412 acres per 1,000/pop. Community Park land = 1.2882 acres per 1,000/pop. Recreation facilities = ~ $240 capital investment per capita (~t current coot) Public Facilities: County Library Buildings: 0.33 square feet per capita County Library Collection: ! .35 2.05 books per capita by FY 10 County Jail: 0.0024 beds per capita (2.4 beds per 1000 population) County Emergency Medical Service: .000068 EMS units per capita ('1 Unit/15,000 Population) County '-'*~-'-- ~- ......... * Bui!dingc: o =Q .......~""*..,. ""- capit~ CIE- 6 Words ctruckthrough are deletions - Words underlined are additions 8B D~ C2 C2.! C3 C3.! F"/I -I St2tc Rccre2tlcn St2tc Prosorvcs: CIE- 7 Words ctruckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions C7.~ C~ C'O ,") St=to Ornamcnt2l r.- ~~11 ~11 ~;~1~ .................... ~ ..... on ........... ~ ..... on Picnic Areas = ~/5~ Play Areas = 8B CIE- 8 Words struckthrcugh are deletions- Words underlined are additions a. ,Nc ctcnd=rd in inductr/ to ucab~c ......... CIE- 9 Words struckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY OBJECTIVE 1.2: Provide public facilities in order to maintain adopted level of service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund, or within the County's authority to require others to provide. Existing facility deficiencies measured against the adopted level of service standards will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and intergovernmental revenues received based on economic activity. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special assessments and taxes. Policy 1.2.1: The estimated capital expenditures for all needed public facilities shall not exceed conservative estimates of revenues from sources that are available to the County pursuant to current law, and which have not been rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required to enact a source of revenue. Policy 1.2.2: Existing and future development shall both pay for the costs of needed public facilities. Existing development shall pay for some or all facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, some or all of the replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and may pay a portion of the cost of facilities needed by future development. Both existing and future development may have part of their costs paid by grants, entitlements or public facilities from other levels of government and independent districts. Policy 1.2.3: Public facilities financed by County enterprise funds (i.e., potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste) may be financed by debt to be repaid by user fees and charges for enterprise services, or the facilities may be financed from current assets (i.e., reserves, surpluses and current revenue). Policy 1.2.4: Public facilities financed by non-enterprise funds (i.e., roads, surface water management, parks, library, emergency medical service, and jail, "'*~' ............ * ~' '~'~ ..... ~ '~'-p'-,,~,,,',* ~-,- ~ ........ / shall be financed from current revenues and assets (pay-as-you-go financing) and Revenue Bonds approved by the Board of County Commissioners. c×ccpt '~'"* "*"""~"~'~' ~'"~ ' .... '~' "~ .... ; ............ * "';*~ ..... '~ .... ' ..... ~ Debt financing shall not be used to provide excess capacity in non-enterprise public facilities unless the excess capacity is an unavoidable result of a capital improvement that is needed to achieve or maintain standards for levels of service. Notwithstanding other provisions of this policy, general obligation bonds approved by referendum may be used for any public facilities to acquire capacity needed within the ~; ........ Schedule of Capital improvements~,~,~"'~-', or for excess capacity. Policy 1.2.5: The County shall not provide a public facility, nor shall it accept the provision of a public facility by others, if the County is unable to pay for the subsequent annual operating and maintenance costs of the facility. CIE -10 Words °* ....~-*~' ..... ~ ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions (11) Policy 1.2.G: The County shall continue to collect Road Impact Fees for road facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance transportation improvements necessitated by such development. Policy 1.2.?: The County shall continue to collect impact fees for Parks and Recreation~ EMS and Library facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance Parks and Recreation, EMS and Library improvements necessitated by such development. Policy 1.2.8: If, for any reason, the County cannot provide revenue sources identified as needed funding for specific projects within the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements, the Growth Management Plan shall be amended based on one or more of the following actions: Remove through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements that exceed the adopted levels of service for the growth during the next five (5) fiscal years; Remove from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities that reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility but do not provide additional facility capacity; Where feasible, transfer funds from a funded Non-Capital Improvement Element capital project in order to fund an identified deficient Capital Improvement Element public facility. The resulting revisions shall be reflected in the required annual update. Lower the adopted level of service standard through a plan amendment for the facility for which funding cannot be obtained. Do not issue development orders that would continue to cause a deficiency based on the facility's adopted level of service standard. Policy 1.2.9: Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources of 13%. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self-imposed level of constraint. Current bondable revenues are ad valorem taxes and State-shared revenues, specifically gas taxes and the half-cent sales tax. The Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy. CIE -11 Words "* ....I-'~' ..... ~' are deletions - Words underlined are additions 8B PUBLIC EXPENDITURES: COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA OBJECTIVE 1.3: Effective with plan implementation public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area shall be limited to those facilities needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the Future Land Use Element. In addition, public expenditures shall include the following categories: A. Maintenance of existing public facilities; B. Beach, shore and waterway access; C. Beach renourishment. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high hazard area for the replacement and maintenance of public facilities identified in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 1.3.2: The calculated needs for public facilities will be based on the adopted level of sen/ice standards and future growth projections within the coastal high hazard area. The Future Land Use Element limits _new residential development (thus obligations for infrastructure expenditures) to a maximum of four dwelling units per gross acre within portions of the coastal high hazard area. Policy 1.3.3: The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and will develop a program to expand the availability of such including funding options for acquisition. '~';*~'; CIE -12 Words ctruckthrcu..3h are deletions - Words underlined are additions PROVIDE NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS OBJECTIVE 1.4: The County shall coordinate its land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital improvements by providing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders. Policy 1.4.1: The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. :~ r-o,.~,..[, .......... * '-[ .... * The Schedule of Capital Improvements may be modified as follows: A. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be updated annually. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3187, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, developments of regional impact, and certain small scale development activities. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3177, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan. Policy 1,4.2: All Category A public facility capital improvements shall be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Policy 1.4.3: The County shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget all the public facility projects listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements for expenditures during the appropriate fiscal year. Projects for which appropriations have been made in the annual budget will not be removed once they have been relied upon for the issuance of a final site development plan, final plat, or building permit. The County ma:,' ~!cc shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget additional public facility projects that conform to Policy 1.1.2 (B.2) and Policy 1.1.4 (C) and (E). Policy 1.4,4: The County shall determine, prior to the issuance of final site development plans, final plats and building permits whether or not there is sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for existing population and the proposed development. No final site development plan, final plat, or building permit shall be issued unless the levels of service for the resulting development will achieve the standards in Policy 1.1.5 Category A, and the requirements for Concurrency Management as outlined in the policies within Objective 1.5 of this element are met. Policy 1.4,5: Public facilities and services provided by Collier County with public funds in accordance with the 5-year Schedule of Capital Improvements in the Capital Improvements Element will be limited to Service Areas established within the boundaries designated on Map PW-1 titled, "Collier County's Three (3) Water and/or Sewer Districts Boundaries" and PW-3 titled, "Rural Transition Water & Sewer District" appearing in the Public Facilities Element for water and sewer. Road improvements will be provided as designated on the Schedule of Capital Improvements Mapc 'r,', ..^~ .~,.,~ 'rD ~;~1~1 ....... yc"' r-~,;,.., !mprcv~m~nt =' .... , ~a~,.,, appearing in the Traffic r.; .... ..... ~ .................. ~- ............. ,, CIE-13 Words ctruckthrcu;h are deletions - Words underlined are additions 8B Capital Improvement Element. All other public facilities and service types will be provided on a County-Wide availability basis. CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE 1.5: To ensure that public facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development, the County's Concurrency Management System shall be consistent with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-5.0055, Florida Administrative Code. The County shall establish a regulatory and monitoring program to ensure the scheduling, funding and timely construction of Category A public facilities concurrent with, or prior to, the issuance of a final site development plan, final plat or a building permit to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards. Policy 1.5.1: The concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage and Solid Waste Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or The necessary facilities and services are under construction at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of paragraphs A and B of this policy. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. The agreement must guarantee that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the development occur. Policy 1.5.2: The concurrency requirement for the Parks and Recreation_.~""4.~ ~,-,,,,-,~,v.. Spcco Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policy 1.5.1 A, B and C is met; or At the time the final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed contract which provides for commencement of actual construction of the required facilities within one year of the issuance of the final site development plan, final plat or building permit; or The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement which requires the commencement of the actual construction of the facilities within one year of the issuance of the applicable final site development plan, final plat, or building permit. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. CIE -14 Words struckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions Policy 1,5.3: The concurrency requirement of the Tr~ff!c C!rc'.'!~t!o,", Transportation Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are is met: A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policies 1.5.1 A, B, and C and 1.5.2 B and C is met ;or In areas in which Collier County has committed to provide the necessary public facilities and services in accordance with its five-year schedule of capital improvements, the concurrency requirement of the Tr~ff!c C!rc'~'l~tlc,", Transportation Level of Service Standards would shall be achieved or maintained if all of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System, based upon an Adequate Capital Improvements Program and adequate implementing regulations are met: A Capital Improvement Element and a five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which, in addition to meeting all of the other statutory and rule requirements, must be financially feasible. The Capital Improvement Element and Schedule of Capital Improvements may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of the applicable, adopted Florida Department of Transportation five-year work program. A five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which must include both necessary facilities to maintain the adopted level of service standards to serve the new development proposed to be permitted and the necessary facilities required to eliminate those portions of existing deficiencies which are a priority to be eliminated during the five-year period under the Schedule of Capital Improvements. A realistic, financially feasible funding system based on currently available revenue sources which must be adequate to fund the public facilities required to serve the development authorized by the building permit and which public facilities are included in the five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements. A five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which must include the estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion. A five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which must demonstrate that all actual construction of the road facilities ~,nd tho prov~clo,", ~f c~,"vlccc is scheduled to commence in or before the third year of the five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements. A plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or delay construction of any road project which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year Schedule of Improvements. (11) Policy 1,5.4: The County shall continue to implement a Concurrency Management System, as identified !,", tho Adequate Publlc,'-""~'~*~"~'~,,,.,w "~-'~v,~,, ,~,,~v ..... ~'"',.~. ~w ..~,~'~ ~v~,,,~""'~.,,~ in Division 3.15 of the Collier County Land Development Code, which shall include a regulatory program and monitoring system consistent with this Growth Management Plan and consistent specifically with the policies under Objective 1.5 of this Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring system shall enable the County to determine whether it is adhering to the adopted Level of Service Standards and ~ Schedule of Capital Improvements. CIE -15 Words ctruc~thrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 8B The Schedule of Capital Improvements on the following pages will eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out facilities, and make available adequate facilities for future growth. Each project is numbered and named, and its cost during each of the next five fiscal years is shown in thousands of dollars (000). The month and year for actual commencement of construction and the month and year each project will be completed (in service) is indicated. Each project in Category A is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element and the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Each project in Category [] is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element. Optional elements were not developed for Category [] facilities. CIE -16 Words ctr'Jc?,thrcuGh are deletions - Words underlined are additions o o L~ 0 0 0 I'-- r-.- I,,.. W -J W W UJ ...I UJ ...I UJ I.- UJ .-I LU I.- 0 flu 0 I-- Z .-I UJ I-- Z I,U U.I o Q. 0 0 0 od 0 0 0 0 813 '" ! o o c:, o o o c, o o o DJ .-I LLI I-- Z 0 LU .J 0 m 0 0 I,U 0 co o ~ Z m 0 ._.1 0 Z tJ.. cq 0 ._1 >- 0 Z U..~ 0 _J 0 Ol,<, 0 8B 0 0 0 0 ~-~ 0 0 ~.~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z UJ I-- Z UJ 0 --I o .a o ~ o Zo~ ,,z,o~ IJJ 8B 0 0 0 0 0 0 C~ C~ CD 0 0 ~J C~J C~ I- z 0 .,J mi 0 rr O~ "'0 AZ -on,q. z '~ m ~ 0 orr'e) ~" ~., ~ 8B O O~ O cO O O (D O O (D O O (D O O (D aD O O O O 0 0 0 Z r--, 0 .0 I-- O "3 '~O o o ~ o L~ 0 o 0 81t o L~ 0 o 0 o o o o o Z IAI (7) Z 17,] IAI O. >- O Z LU I.l.I 0 _l 1.1.1 0 o g o 8B 0 0 zI- 0 qo o~ W 0 W W W m LU LIJ L J_ UJ iii UJ Z UJ iii 0 iii i-I .J UJ 0 0 o ..i 0 I.- n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cO 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 g CD CD 0 0 C~ I- z I.U ..J z 1.1.1 Q. fl. IiJ ,.I n- 0 0 n- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O~ 0 0 143 LO o~ O3 0 Z UJ iii i-I UJ iii UJ iii _.l W 0 0 0 81t I-- Z U,I o~ .J fl,. U.I z _J 81t cJ uJ i~j f~ iii UJ UJ UJ iii -J a: n- o o. ILl .J U.I I'- Z ELI u.I 0 Q,. 0 04 0 0 0 0 0 '1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~g 8B I-- Z U.I ._1 ILl Z LU I.U Q.. ..J U.I 0 UJ .-I .-I 0 0 0 Z aJ 8B 1~ l- O m ~ o I... Z UJ Z 0 -I >- I-- Z 0 ..I 0 I.- [U I- UJ 0 Z UJ UJ .d UJ Z 0 D. 0 UJ 0 0 UJ 0 zP ~ I-- Z ...I 1.1.1 ...I .-I COSTS & REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY) In the table below, the left column itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The center column contains the 5-year {-F-Y~(FY02-06) amounts of rcctrictcd facility specific revenues. The right column is a calculation of thc expenses vs. revenues def-i~t for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. Below the subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue that will be .... ~'-'- fund the deficit in order to maintain the standards for levels of service listed in used by the County to CIE Policy 1.1.5. COUNTY ROADS PROJECTS/EXPENSES LESS Available Revenues: Gas Taxes Road Impact Fees Carry Forward/Grants/Misc. Revenue Bonds General Fund Transfer Commercial Paper Loans 83,080,000 150,000,000 61,277,000 192,920,000 67,060,000 48,538,000 Balance $602,875,000 602,875,000 0 DRAINAGE PLANS AND PROJECTS LESS Available Revenues: SFWMD FDEP Naples 326,000 9,874,000 60,000 Deficit 18,808,000 10,260,000 (8,548,000) WATER & SEWER SYSTEMS LESS: Impact Fees/User Fees SOLID WASTE/LANDFILL Balance Balance 155,422,000 155,422,000 0 0 PARKS & RECREATION LESS Available Revenues: Park Impact Fees Bonds/Revenue Boating Improvement Funds 44,323,000 750,000 Balance 45,073,000 45,073,000 0 CIE 49 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE Less: EMS Impact Fees JAIL Deficit Balance 8B $ 6,650,000 2,341,000 (4,309,000) LIBRARYBULDINGS AND BANKS Less: Library Impact Fees Deficit Balance 15,703,000 6,828,000 (8,875,000) Subtotal of Facility Specific Revenues vs. Costs ADD: Non-Facility Specific Revenues: General Fund Revenues Deficit Balance (21,732,000) 21,732,000 $ 0 CIE 5o 8B PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION Through continued implementation of adopted land development regulations the following programs have been implemented to ensure that the goals, objectives and policies established in the Capital Improvement Element will be achieved or exceeded. I m,.',,.,.'.,,. D,..,...., Development Order Review As part of the review of all applications for final site development plans, final plats, and building permits, the County will determine whether or not there will be sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for the existing population and for the proposed development in accordance with the requirements of the Concurrency Management System. As part of the review for all development orders havinq negative impacts on Cateqory A Public Facilities other than final site development plans, final plats, building permits, the County will determine whether or not sufficient capacity of Cateqory "A" public facilities are planned for construction concurrent with the impacts on levels of service that will be created by the proposed development durinq the next five fiscal years. 32. Impact Fees Impact Fee Ordinances will require the same standard for the level of service as is required by Policy 1.1.5. 43. Annual Budqet The annual budget will include in its capital appropriations all projects in the Schedule of Capital Improvements that are planned for expenditures during the next fiscal year. G4. Semiannual Report The mandatory semiannual report to the Department of Community Affairs concerning amendments to the comprehensive plan due to emergencies, developments of regional impact and selected small developments will report on changes, if any, to adopted goals, objectives and policies in the Capital improvement Element. 65. Update of Capital Improvement Element The monitoring of and adjustment to the Capital Improvement Element to meet the changing conditions must be an ongoing process. Beginning in August of each year, the element will be updated in conjunction with the County's budget process and the release of the official BEBR population estimates and projections. The update will include: 1. Revision of population projections; 2. Updates of facility inventory; 3. Update of unit costs; Update of facilities requirements analysis to project 10 year needs (by fiscal year) in order to program projects to meet the service standards, 5. Update of revenue forecasts in order to evaluate financial feasibility and the CIE 51 County's ability to finance capital improvements needed to meet the Service standards Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next five years. The first year's schedule of projects will be incorporated into the County's budget effective October 1st. 7. Update of the public school and health facilities analysis. 7-6. Concurrency Management System The County has established a Concurrency Management System by adoption of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The system consists of the following components: The Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR) ............. '-""";*"-; ....... ~ ,..~.v,*. on the capacity and levels of service of public facilities compared to the standards for levels of service adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this Element. The AUIR report summarizes the actual capacity of existing public facilities and forecast the capacity of existing and planned public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years. For the purposes of long range capital facility planning, a ten year forecast of projected needed capacity is also done. These forecasts are based on the most recently updated Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvement Element. The annual approval of the AUIR and the identified needed projects and revenues by the Board of County Commissioners -r~,~ ....... ~ ..... * constitutes evidence of the capacity and levels of service of Category A__public facilities for the purpose of issuing development orders during the 12 months following :1:the approval e:~ of the AUIR ...... ' .... ,., 'r~,~ ..... ,-, ~,. ,h~, ^ ..... ~ I I~A~,I.,..,, .'~nA In,,,,,-,,.'H',.'.,.,,,, D~,~..,..I. ~ D,,~,I;,,', D.-.,.-;IH.;~-- /Al IID~ Public facility capacity review. The County shall use the procedures specified in Implementation Programs 1 and 26 to enforce the requirements of Policies 1.5.1, 1.5.2 and 1.5.3 of this Element. Review of changes in planned capacity of public facilities. The County shall review each amendment to this Capital Improvement Element in particular any changes in standards for levels of service and changes in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in order to enforce the policies of this Element. Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies. The County shall annually review the Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies that are incorporated in this Capital Improvement Element: Standards for levels of service are applied within appropriate geographical areas of the County. Standards for County-Wide public facilities are applied to development orders based on levels of service throughout the County. Standards for public facilities that serve less than the entire County are applied to development orders on the basis of levels of service within assigned areas. Levels of service are compared to adopted standards on an annual basis. Annual monitoring is used, rather than case-by-case monitoring, for the following reasons: annual monitoring corresponds to annual expenditures for capital improvements during the County's fiscal year; and b. annual monitoring covers seasonal variations in levels of service. CIE 52 -8B 87. Second 5-year Evaluation and Appraisal Report The required second 5-year evaluation and appraisal report will address the implementation of the goals, objectives and policies of the Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring procedures necessary to enable the completion of the 5-year evaluation include: a. Review of annual reports of the Concurrency Management System; bo Review of semiannual reports to DCA concerning amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and Co Review of annual updates of this Capital Improvement Element, including updated supporting documents. CIE 53 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Symbol Date Amended ** October 28, 1997 (I) February 23, 1997 (11) May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 97-62 Ordinance No. 99-13 Ordinance No. 2000-32 This is the EAR-based amendment. Due to the magnitude of the changes - which included reformatting the entire Element, affecting every page of the Element - a Roman Numeral is not assigned. * Indicates adopted portions Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. Words ctruc?.thrcugh are deletions- Words underlined are additions 8B I! TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ~. PgRPOS£ TDA~I I TDAWI ~ DA. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS* 1. O @2. 43_. 64. 1 L:nd Ucc Prcjccticnc* Travel Demand Tr:vcl Dcm:nd P:~crns * Traffic Circulation Constraints* Future Trsffic Circ'J!:t!cn M:p 2000*Five Year Capital Facility Proqram Future Traffic Circulation Map Series -2010' Year 2025 EB. INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION* 1. Non-motorized Trave~- 2. Aviation* 3. Mass Transit* PERSPECTIVES* 1. Land Use Issues* 2. Marco Island Airport Impacts-* 3. Inter-agency .Coordination Cooperation* 4. Funding of Roadway Improvements* GD. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY* HE. GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES* i Words6+ .... u+k ..... ~ ............. u,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions TABLE lA lB !D 3 ,4 MAP TD_4 A%Ai lit TD_I A C TD_t ~%AI iii i va LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES 8B PAGE Two Way P, rtoria!c 'T'D A KIIn TD A I~1_,') 1 TD A Iq, l_~ TD A ~I_~A TDAKI ,')o TRAN-39 TRAN-30 41 LIST OF MAPS Eastern Cc!!icr County 'T'D A kl_A Existing N'.:mbcr cf Lanes Ecctcrn Ccllicr County TD A KLI' TDAKI o T.D. AN-9 ii Words "f .... ~'f~' ..... ~' ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions I IO1' FtC'rADI COI&,IAD(~ICIP_I TR-! £ TD_I f"_l 'rD_4 TD_I 'rD_4 C_; iii i i v 'T'D_"~TAI TR - 1' Financially Feasible Plan and Traffic Circulation Map- Year 2025. TR - 2* Total Transportation Needs Plan - Year 2025. TR - 3* Future Roadway Functional Classification and Multi-Modal Facilities onn-~ Existing ~'[' '""~"" '''; Lanes TD_; AiR/ Functlon=l Cl2cslflc=tlcn Map 'T'DJ:: r~ %Al Lcvc!s cf Sar;ice Yccr 200! 'I'D A KI 40 ?D A kl TD A kl TRAN TD A M TRS.N 'rD h &l 25 26 27 42 43 44 45 41 47 'I iii Words struckthrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions TR-SD (11) ~o A ASA~ .~ n 4.° 49 50 Words ctruckthrcuGh are deletions - Words underlined are additions MAP TD_~ A I::: 11 LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES (continued) 8B PAGE Illl TD ?ATAI 17 Vn.-.,. Ortrtq ,'Jrt Di,-,,,..I,-, ~n,,4 D.-.,'In~'.+ri-~n ~,'-ili+i~- I~An,,-,.,n 111'~ '1'D_"7/'~%AI ~1 T..~n(,;) CO),-,,, ..Iv> '3 ~11I I I I i ! i! k I I I~llVll I IV~IV ~ TR-7CE 22 T;:r,~!t Rc'Jtc 4 'I'D_ 'Tr'_ 1 11,I T_ 1 iA/ Fut'Jrc Tr:nc!t Dcmcnd Centare & Tr3nclt Ccrddcrs Wactarn Co!!!or County Futura M~cc Transit Map* Figure I Ecctcr,-, Call!ar County* Five-year Transportation Capital Improvement Locations Table I Five-year Transportation Capital Improvements Work Proqram 54 55 56 59 60 61 62 64 74 75 29 3O ¥ Words ctruckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions D A. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS 1. Land U~e Pr~jeet'.'~n~ Travel Demand 8B The MPO Long Range Transportation Plan's Financially Feasible Plan and Needs Plan as adopted on March 23, 2001, are hereby incorporated to define the major roadway needs for Collier County. The 2025 Financially Feasible Plan is presented as Map TR-1 and shows the needed roadway improvements that can be funded through the year 2025. Map TR-2 shows the total nroiected roadway improvements needed bv 2025. Note that the Financially Feasible Plan does not include all needs identified through the Urban Area Transportation Study. It only includes the vroiects that can be funded from reasonably anticipated revenues. While the total 2025 needs are estimated to require funding of approximately 1.7 billion dollars, the cost feasible plan reflects funding of approximately $1.5 billion. Based on recent efforts to treat transportation as a top priority, the Board of County Commissioners has committed to increase revenues so tha~ future needs are fully met._As directed by the Board of County Commissioners, efforts are underway to develoo measures to close the 0.2 billion dollar shortfall between the total needs vlan and cost feasible vlan through public/private partnershivs such as reserving rie. ht of way and drainage. Apoendix A nresents the 2025 Transportation Plan resulting from the Urban Area Transportation Study vrevared by the MPO as additional data and analysis.. Man TR - 1 also serves as the Traffic Circulation Map that oresents the number of lanes on Collier County Roadways in 2025. May - TR 3 shows the functional classification of the roadways and the multi-modal facilities in the county. The refinement of these plans to incorporate updates to the MPO's Plan, development of a collector road system and results of corridor specific studies, shall occur on a regular basis upon approval of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC). 2. Travel Demand Patterns 1 Words *+ .... v+~ ..... ~ ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions 8B 't 3, 2. Traffic Circulation Constraints In many parts of the Naples Urban Area, traffic circulation movements are constrained by the natural features of the landscape such as the Gordon River. Still other parts offer constraints of the man-made variety, such as golf courses and the Naples Airport. In many instances approved developments (some existing, others not yet built) block the way of logical extensions of urban collector and arterial roads. The single most noticeable constraint is the Gordon River as it extends from the Naples Bay northward under the East Tamiami Trail (US 41) to its connection with the Golden Gate canal system. The characteristics of the highway network at this location resembles an "hour-glass". On the western extreme, US 41 and Goodlette Road converge on the narrow "straits" of the Gordon River bridge, while to the east, US 41 and Davis Boulevard do likewise. The result-is the typical "bottleneck" effect when too much traffic volume is forced through a ccn~tn:cted constricted area. The other contributing factor to current and future congestion problems is associated with the northwest/southeast configuration of the East Trail (US 41). Because this roadway converges with the east/west and north/south roadways at an angle it has the impact of forcing or "squeezing" the travel demand into the confined area of the Gordon River corridor. This one roadway serves both the north/south and the east/west travel demand in the East Naples area. 2 Words ~'+ ....~'+~' ..... ~' are deletions -Words underlined are additions Travelers at the southeastern comer of the Urban Area have only one route into the central City of Naples, i.e., the East Trail, whereas travelers in the northeast reaches of the Urban Area have a multitude of choices along the roadway grid for a route to downtown Naples. In developing plans for new and expanded roadways that make up the long range network, the County has kept in view these natural and man-made traffic circulation constraints. Even though environmental concerns are usually addressed through the permitting process, it is important to consider various highway alternatives in light of the sometimes fragile ecological features. Words struckthrough are deletions -Words underlined are additions ,, 8B :4 (II) 4. 3_ F-.'.turc Traffic Circulation 5~aps Ycars 2eec Five-year Capital Facility Program 2002 - 2006 "pi, .... A ....... ;~...4~.4 ;~ ,"p.~ ~ .~ ,c,,~g~.4 ;~ +~ ........ A ~ cmn '~n~ ~-'-~;,~! ]r2..~rovoi"...cilt f~r that y:~-. Table 1 and Fi.~re 1 present the Collier County Transpo~ation Work Pro~ram for the FY 2002 - FY 2006 time frame. The improvements shown on this table and fi.~re represent a sub-set of the needs identified in the Collier County 2025 Needs Plan (Ma~ TR - 2~ and ~e included in the cu~ent Capit~ Improvement Element (C~) Sehedule:,,o~;;~amt~ rtm~ove~n~s~,~;~,~menfle~ for funding within the next five years. 6. 4_ Future Traffic Circulation Map Series - Year 2025 Rule 9J-5.007 requires a mat~ or map series that presents the following: number of lanes on each facility; roadway functional classification; and multi-modal facilities (ports airports, and rail lines). Map TR - 1 (The 2025 Financially Feasible Transportation Plan) serves as the 2025 Traffic Circulation Map showing the number of lanes on Collier County Roadways. Map - TR 3 shows the 2025 roadway functional classification and the multi-modal facilities in the county. 4 Words ctruckthrough are deletions -Words underlined are additions 8B EB. INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION 1. Non-Motorized Travel Today in Collier County, there exists the potential for an integrated network of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that would provide a safe, clean, healthy, and efficient opportunity for travel throughout the urban area. To help create a more balanced and livable transportation system, one that provides for bicycling and walking, Collier County has undertaken new roles and responsibilities not previously performed. The Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan, developed by the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff, was adopted by the MPO in December, 1994. The purpose of the Pathway Plan is to plan for the future needs of bicyclists, pedestrians and other non-motorized travel modes. The Plan is a tool to guide the MPO's Bicycle/Pedestrian Program within six essential areas: (1) establishment; (2) engineering; (3) education; (4) enforcement; (5) encouragement; and (6) economics. These interrelated areas address Collier County's non-motorized issues, constraints, needs and opportunities. The Pathway Plan is currently being implemented in Collier County. The Pathway Plan documents the extent of the existing pathway system. Many of the major highways have sidewalks incorporated into their design. It is a policy of this plan that all future capacity improvements described in this plan shall include provisions for both bicycles and pedestrians. In addition, the Subdivision Regulations of Collier County provide for bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout a development. The 2020 Pathway Plan also provides for the systematic completion of an integrated system. It is a policy of this Plan that Collier County will annually adopt a 5 Year Pathway Work Program that establishes pathway priorities. The County, to the greatest extent possible, will identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathway Work Program. In addition to providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, the County will encourage their use, and promote safe bicycle and pedestrian practices through the continued support and implementation of the Comprehensive Pathway Plan. 2. Aviation ............... a ......................................... v ...... v .... ort Master Plans were prepared for the Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and the Marco Island Executive Airport. These plans provide insight as to existing facilities and conditiens and make recommendations regarding potential opportunities and necessary future facilities at the three airports. a. Existing Facilities The development of separate master plans for Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and Marco Island Executive Airport required the collection and evaluation of information relative to each of the airports and surrounding areas including the following: Physical inventories and descriptions of facilities and services currently provided by each of the airports 5 Words "'+ ....['*~ ..... ~' ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions · Background information pertaining to aircraft fleet mix and historical activity levels · Regional plans and studies potentially affecting future airport development activity Immokalee Regional Airport: The airport is located on a 1,100 acre site in the north-central part of the County, approximately 40 miles northeast of Naples. Located on the northeast side of Immokalee, the airport is only one mile from the Central Business District. Primary access to the airport is via State Route 29 to County Route 846, which intersects with Airpark Boulevard to the south of the airport. Little development has occurred at the airport since its transfer of ownership in 1960 from the United States Government. Both landside and airside facilities are located at the airport. Landside facilities include the aircraft storage hangars, fueling facilities, etc. Airside facilities included at Immokalee are three runways, each 5,000 feet long and 150 feet wide. Taxiways are available as well. The airside facilities presently available provide for opportunities that are not available at other general aviation airports within the County. The three 5,000 foot runways and pavement strength provide operational capability exceeded only by Naples Municipal Airport. Additionally, only a portion of the 1,100 acres at the Immokalee Regional Airport is currently being used for airfield purposes. Large tracts of land remain available for future development of additional landside facilities and future economic development activity. Everglades Airpark: Everglades Airpark was initially purchased and developed by Collier County in 1968. The airport purchase was funded through monetary assistance provided by the Federal Aviation Administration, a National Park Grant, and Collier County. Little development has taken place since its opening, other than the required maintenance projects. Situated outside the boundaries of Everglades National Park and the Big Cypress National Preserve, the airport is surrounded on three sides by water. The airport is immediately surrounded by lands zoned as areas of environmental concern. Facilities at Everglades Airpark include a single runway that is 50 feet wide and 2,400 feet long, a taxiway, and runway lighting. Parking facilities, fueling and hangar facilities are also available. A terminal building/pilots lounge has been recently constructed, which provides a number of services. Marco Island Executive Airport: In the late 1960's, plans for a resort-oriented area south of Naples were conceived. Deltona, the developer of the Marco Shores project, determined that along with the upscale resort area, an airport was needed capable of accommodating small air carrier and general aviation aircraft. Construction of the airport began in 1972, and was completed in 1976. Through a land swap with the State of Florida, the County recently acquired the airport property in exchange for property within the Fakahatchee Strand. Existing airfield facilities include one runway, which is 5,000 feet long and 100 feet wide, a taxiway, various navigational aids, as well as airfield lighting. Automobile parking facilities are available adjacent to the terminal building. b. Future Potential Opportunities Immokalee Regional Airport: According to the Immokalee Regional Airport Master Plan, a number of factors support the notion that this airport could become a regional airline/aircraft maintenance base in the future. The length, width, and pavement strength of the existing airfield is capable of accommodating nearly all of the aircraft in the national regional airline fleet. There is ample open land available for future development of additional hangar space. 6 Words "'* ....~'*~' ..... ~' ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions r8B The establishment of the airport in conjunction with the Southwest Florida International Airport as a Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) could provide some opportunities for expanded air cargo operations. The Immokalee Regional Airport can offer space for industrial development and warehousing taking advantage of the FTZ. Such services could involve turbo-prop, business jet, or even smaller commercial jet activity. Additionally, the shipping of fresh produce from the airport may be a possibility. Considering the large agricultural base in the Immokalee area, specialty produce opportunities could be developed for movement by air to restaurants and retailers within the region, or nationally. The regional climate may offer an incentive as well for future flight training facilities. The weather in Southwest Florida is ideal for training operations. The airport has the land area available on site to support this type of operation and development of the necessary hangar and terminal facilities. Everglades Airpark: Land and environmental constraints at the Everglades Airpark provide little in the way of increased operations. The general intent of the Everglades Airpark Master Plan is demand-based rather than time-based. This means that reasonable levels of activity potential that are derived from this forecasting effort will be related to planning levels rather than dates in time. The demand levels, combined with airfield limitations suggest that the Airpark will continue to serve primarily single engine and twin-engine piston aircraft. The waters surrounding Everglades Airpark are currently utilized by seaplanes. The waters surrounding the Airpark provide a unique opportunity to increase seaplane operations, by providing daily sight-seeing flights and overnight excursions to coastal areas with campground facilities. Marco Island Executive Airport: According to the Marco Island Executive Airport Master Plan, Collier County Airport Authority should continue its efforts on operating the airport as an attractive, efficient, and safe facility. It was recommended that the Airport Authority continue to market and develop the airport as a facility to serve primarily corporate type aircraft indicative of the visitor and resident clientele of the Marco Island Area, and attract and maintain scheduled commuter service for the community. c. Estimated Development Timelines And Costs The development timelines and costs are included in the Master Plans for each of the airports. ................................. r .......................... ~ ....................... adc cd in T ........ 1 flfl~ The short term planning horizon covers items of highest priority as well as items that should be developed as the airport approaches the short term activity milestones. Priority items include improvements to safety and pavement maintenance. Also included, are improvements to facilities that are inadequate for present demand. Because of their priority, those items will need to be incorporated into County, State, and FAA programming. When short term horizon activity levels are reached, it will then be time to program for the intermediate term based upon the next activity milestones. Similarly, when the intermediate term milestones are reached, it will then be time to program for the long range. The cost estimates within each of the airport master plans were increased by 30% in order to allow for engineering and other contingencies that may be experienced by the project. 7 Words ctruckthrcu.gh are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) 3. Mass Transit a. Purpose Collier County currcnt!y ~' ....... ~'~:~ .......... ~ ~:~'~ route ~- .......... initiated deviated fixed route service for public transportation on February 15, 2001. Private services offered in the County are fixed route "trolleys" which operate during the winter season in Naples and on Marco Island, and a network of para-transit providers that offer transportation services to the disadvantaged. The Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) program is coordinated by Collier County, which has been designated as the Coordinated Provider by the Naples Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The TD services offer home pick-up and delivery transportation for the elderly, handicapped, and economically disadvantaged in the County. The "trolley" systems mentioned above are run primarily for the tourist segment of the population and have fixed routes that visit the major shopping, beach and hotel interest points. b. Future System Needs On August 3, 1999 the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Public Transportation Development Plan (PTDP), and agreed to become the Governing Agency for Transit in Collier County. The PTDP contains estimates of un-met need in Collier County, both for the existing TD services, and for general public transportation. It contains planning level discussions on demand centers, route locations, vehicle sizes and types of services. --; ............... '~ ............. ~' ......... The Public Transportation Operating Plan (PTOP) was adopted by the MPO on December 8, 2000 and by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on January 9, 2001:1 hereby incorporated by reference. Other services proposed in the start up public transportation system are a vanpool program, circulator service in Immokalee, an Immokalee to Naples shuttle service, and a Commuter Assistance Program. Although the PTPD final report suggested the need for numerous public transportation services in Collier County, the scale and growth rate of the initial system was such that no local funding contribution was predicted to be required until fiscal year 2006. This situation is the result of gradual changes in the requirements for local matching funds that accompany state and federal grant funds. Collier County is already spending funds on public transportation that meet the match requirements. Words "* .... t.,~, ..... ~' are deletions -Words underlined are additions t~C. PERSPECTIVES 1. Land Use Issues The Transportation Element is closely related to the Future Land Use Element. It has long been the pattern that the development of land necessitates improvements and expansion to the transportation system. The two elements are so closely tied, in fact, that changes or shifts in the land use patterns can drastically impact the performance of the roadway system. It is for this reason that the County requires most land development proposals (e.g., DRI, rezone, and provisional use requests) to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. An analysis of the proposal's impact is prepared and submitted to the recommending and approving authorities. As an alternative to this pattern of demand driving the transportation system improvements, the County has begun to explore ways to have the roadway system guide the patterns and densities of development. The County can determine the type of roadway system it wishes to maintain at the adopted level of service and then take steps to permit the type of land uses that will be consistent with that system. In this way, the County will be in a better position to keep the demand for transportation services from outstripping the supply of the roadway system. The County has also recognized the importance of good site planning as it relates to a projects ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Inadequate control of access points, median openings and signalized intersections can accelerate the deterioration of the systems overall level of service just as fast as the increases in traffic volumes. The County has developed and adopted policies to control the number, location and type of access points to the road network. These policies are based on the Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution No. 92-42) and follow-up Resolution No. 01-246, and existing road and land use conditions. An access management plan map exists for each mixed-use activity center. The purpose of the access management plans is to minimize the adverse impacts to safety, capacity and operating conditions of the roadways, while providing adequate access to those properties. Access points on state controlled roads are subject to approval by the Florida Department of Transportation. 2. Marco Island Airport Impacts The Marco Island Airport, located east of SR-951 approximately 4.5 miles south of US 41 is a facility having a runway length of approximately 5,000 feet. Access to the facility is from SR-951 via Mainsail Drive. The facility currently provides only general aviation services to the southern urban area. Adjacent to the air strip is the Marco Shores Golf Club Community consisting of a golf course and a phase one residential area of 240 condominium units. All other lands surrounding the facility are under State ownership and are environmentally sensitive. Peak season-peak hour traffic counts taken in 1988 at the intersection of Mainsail Drive at SR-95t reveal 120 vehicles using Mainsail Drive during the period of 8:00a.m. and 10:00a.m. This count would include both residential and airport generated traffic. A 1985 analysis of Marco Island Airport operation is part of the Continuing Florida Aviation System Plan indicates the following current conditions: In 1994, Marco Island Airport had approximately 30 based aircraft with 15,000 annual general aviation operations. By 2005, the facility is expected to have 35 based aircraft and 21,000 annual operations. The airport has been served by regional airlines in the past. If commercial commuter Words ctruckthrough are deletions- Words underlined are additions ,8B service was ever resumed it could be expected to generate an additional 8,000 operations per year by 2005. The current limited use of this publicly owned facility places no significant impact on SR-951. 3. Inter-agency Coordination Cooperation In Collier County, the responsibility for providing transportation facilities rests with several different agencies. Long-range transportation planning is the primary charge of the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO is made up cf !cca! _~,,: ..... ;.,;,:ho r~. r,~,;~ r, ....... staff is housed in the Transportation Services Division, Transportation Planning Department. The Collier County Transportation Planning Department provides staff services to the MPO. The MPO coordinates its planning activities with the City, County, and State Department of Transportation. The programming and construction activities are handled by the City of Naples, City of Marco Island, Collier County, and the Florida Department of Transportation. Each agency's construction programs are monitored by the MPO to ensure inter-agency consistency. 4. Funding of Roadway Improvements In Collier County the pursuit of additional funding for roadway improvements has led to the implementation of numerous funding alternatives. The County has adopted the maximum allowable a f:.;'e cent local option gas taxes in addition to a one-cent voted gas tax. Impact fees for roadway construction were initiated in 1985 and up-dated in 1992 2000, and 2002. Municipal Service Taxing Units have been used to implement area specific projects. On the State level, local governments through the Metropolitan Planning Organization have directed their attention to the under-funded State roads in Collier County. One of the MPO's roles is to ensure that local governments in its jurisdiction ~eee4,~ direct .equitable treatment w~th:~n tSc FD©T D:~gt~ct state and federal funding to the highest priority projects. 10 Words ctruc,kthrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions 8B GD. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY As part of the Transportation Element, the County established minimum acceptable level of service standards on the existing highway system. For ,",,cst County facilities, the level of service standard to be maintained is "D" or "E". as measured on a ---' ....... peak hour basis. Several County and State facilities have been given a minimum LOS "E" standard. To maintain the adopted LOS on roadways, the County has implemented a concurrency management regulatory program that ties issuance of development orders to the demonstration of adequate capacity on all roadway segments that would be significantly impacted by new development. In summary this program maintains an inventory of the following for each arterial and collector roadway segment: · Actual traffic on each segment as determined through an annual traffic counting program, · The peak hour service capacity as determined by engineering analyses performed by the Transportation Division, and · Capacity that will be used by new development for which a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities has been issued. In order to prevent sudden unanticipated LOS failures, the County will adopt, within one year or sooner, a "real time .... checkbook accounting" concurrency management process. ~ See the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code) for details of this process. 11 Words ctruckthrough are deletions - Words underlined are additions '8B ill standards ...... ycars ............................ Program, .o ~,~. Policy 1. Monitoring Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code is also known as the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO). It describes the annual count program done on County roads to determine their annual average daily traffic (AADT). It describes how the relationship between that AADT and the segment's adopted level of service (LOS) standard determines the road segment's level of service. The current levels of service at which road segments are operating are reported annually in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). This report indicates which segments are operating at levels of service worse than their adopted standard LOS. It also contains predictions of when certain segments will reach levels of service that exceed their adopted standard LOS. Although traffic volumes are expressed as AADT, LOS calculations are done to ensure adequate levels of service, during Fcak Peak .season, peak hour traffic conditions are skewed in Collier County because of the heavy influx of seasonal residents and tourists. As such, it is deemed an inappropriate and unreasonable imposition on taxpayers to provide a roadway system designed for the peak of the peak season. Therefore, the LOS calculations are based on traffic conditions experienced for 10 months of the year with the peak seasonal and tourist months of February and March omitted from the analysis. 2. LOS Determination And BCC Findings · The annual average daily volumes will be calculated and the peak hour volume interpreted based upon the available data consistent with omitting February and March tourist months from the analysis. The Transportation r~ ........ _ ~v ..........Division shall prcFare a maintain and update a list of all roadway segments, for which a level of service standard has been adopted, that shows the current LOS/~ ~ .... ;-~'~ ~' .... ~ ' ' ' ~ ................... / as well as the adopted LOS standard found in this plan. T~,;~ ~;~ ;~ 12 Words ctruckthrough are deletions -Words underlined are additions Following ,u ......... :~. he ,u .... a ...... ':~' If the volume of traffic of any segments are is found to exceed tSe/r its adopted LOS, a report of the DcFaXmcnt's Division's findings ...... :_~ nl, he ,u~ County's .^.ao will be transmitted to the Board of County Commissioners. The APFO describes the consequences of a road segment operating at a LOS that exceeds its adopted LOS standard. 2.1 Constrained Roadways Constrained facilities are roadways which have been designated by action of the Board of County Commissioners once it has been determined that ~ the facility will not be expanded by two or more through lanes due to physical, environmental or policy constraints. Physical constraints primarily occur when a roadway is developed to the maximum six lane standard or when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to roads, thus making expansion cost prohibitive. Environmental and policy constraints primarily occur when decisions are made not to expand a road based on environmental, historical, archaeological, aesthetic or social impact considerations. Constrained roadways are identified by action of the BCC upon the recommendation of the Transportation Administrator. Roadways identified as constrained shall be subject to growth restrictions such that further LOS degradation does not occur once the roadway is determined to be operating below Level-of- Service standard. Constrained roadways are subject to growth restrictions that only allow for an increase in annual daily traffic volume of 10% above the service volume at Level-of-Service standard resulting in LOS operations not to exceed 110% of service volume. Roadway~ ~pcrat;.ng ~v~-~J; ..... If the service volume ~ exceeded by. :10;%; only de minimis growth ...... .. ~ ..... '" '" could __be applied to the roadway segment. :ncc t~:~ ....... _, ~ _~ ................ 13 Words ctruckthrough are deletions -Words underlined are additions 8B roadway. 14 Words °+ .... ~-+~' ..... h ............. ~., are deletions -Words underlined are additions GOALS~ OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES -8B (II) (II) GOAL 1: TO PLAN FOR, DEVELOP AND OPERATE A SAFE, EFFICIENT, AND COST EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES FOR BOTH THE MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT COLLIER COUNTY. OBJECTIVE 1: The County will maintain the major roadway systemw-*-----e,r~w'-a:"" ~.,.~.~c .... .-e,-~':~ ....... ...., o~ at an acceptable Level of Service by implementing improvements as identified in the annual AUIR or by working directly with other responsible jurisdictions to implement needed improvements to their facilities. Policy 1.1: The County will annually adopt a Schedule of Capital Improvements an Annual Update and ~.~ .......... ,*..~-J *-~v-'~r' ..... ~,r ^~mx~,.,~ covering a period no less than five (5) years, which shall include those projects needed to maintain the network at the adopted Level of Service standard. Policy 1.2: The County shall annually appropriate the funds in the ensuing fiscal year to accommodate those phases of projects listed in the first year of the Schedule of Capital Improvements ^ .-,4 t .......... o ..... /n t TTDx All Programming decisions are based on the AUIR, and annually incorporated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in the CIE. Policy 1.3: County arterial and collector roads as well as State highways not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) shall be maintained at Level of Service "D" or better as addressed in paragraph G-1 of the Transportation Element on *~-~ ~--~;0 ~c .~, .... ~ .......... 1, i~ .... ~-.nre~c:o vel'amc except: Level of Service "E" or better shall be maintained on the following designated roadways. Roadway Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road US 41 From T._qo Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Airport-Pulling Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway to US 41 a; .... . o,,,.... '-'"'"d US 41 tO I '7~ Lo,qan Blvd. Collier Boulevard to Old US 41 Airport-Pullinq Road Airport-Pullin,q Road Davis Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway US 41 to Golden Gate Parkway Pine Ridqe Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Airport-Pulling Road US 41 to Airport-Pullinq Road 15 Words ctruc?.thrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) Livingston Road Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Gulfshore Drive 8B Level of Service "D" or better shall be maintained on all other county and state arterial and collector roads, hcwc;'cr, any o The r,^.;_.~v...~. "'~v....; ....... ....x~t'r~ Collier County Transportation Division shall determine a.~...~ cpdmum LOS ~ ..... ~ count) .... '~ ....... ~'~; .... ;" ~ ~--~ ~ ............... ~" ~dcndfy~ng the traffic volumes that co~espond to the different LOS thresholds on county roads., ~-~ ................................ ; ....v ....... ~ ......................... . . ......... third Transpo~ation Division shall install, as funds pe~it, permanent traffic count stations to better identi[y traffic characteristics of county roads. Based on the traffic count data the Transportation Division shall develop a financially feasible Roads component for the Capital Improvement Policy 1.4: ef ser:4c: ~tan~ards for state ma:retained re, aaa: Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for State Roads with the exception of those on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS). In Collier County FDOT sets the LOS standards for 1-75. The standards for 1-75 are as follows: Existing Rural Area Urbanized Area Transitioning Urbanized Area I- 75 B C C 8R--84 [¢ t~ t~ SR 951 - ~ t~ ER 29 G - SR g2 G - T'::. z. zgn:.cnt cf US il .q;;m Ak-ix;r: Palling Rcva'J (CR 31) m R'a::Iz:.n"2:c fl'am'neck Rca'2 (CR g4~; .:,nj :.5; :.cg..'ncm at ER 95! (la. lc :,f Cai:rloRcad; fram N:.w Y::r!: zxpcdi:cd ,57 7DOT, 16 Words o, .... t.,~, ..... ~, ............. u,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) OBJECTIVE 2: The County will maintain the adopted Level of Service standard as provided for in Policy 1.3 by making the improvements identified on the Five (5) Year Work Program. Policy 2.1: The County shall include in its Schedule of Capital Improvements in the Capital Improvement Element those projects necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service on the roads identified on the Five (5) Year Work Program. Policy 2.2: The County shall annually appropriate the funds necessary to implement those projects shown in the annual element (first year) of the Schedule of Capital Improvements Annual Update and , O~+ f AITID~ (II) OBJECTIVE 3: The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future right-of-ways. Policy 3.1: The County has implemented an advanced Right-of-Way Preservation and Acquisition Program. Policy 3.2: The County includes in its annual Capital Improvement Element ne.~oo'~- t~'~-,,.. ,,vv,vvve°nn cmn w' ........ funding specifically earmarked for use in an advanced Right-of-Way Acquisition Program. ..... ~:~ ~ dyies ~ .... ~. ,~n~, ~n .... ~n ~:~:~,, ...... , .... ~ a c;..~ ~ ........ , a tu shall be conducted periodically to identify the long range right-of way needs of the tr~sportation system based on buildout. Following *~ their, completion, ~c ,u; ..... ~., ,~ n.~: ....... ............... ~, ............ ~ ........ may be .... ~ ............... ~ .... n .... ~ County'~ ...... ~ nee~.the Transportation Ad~nistrator will present a program of ~nding in actions to protect and acquire needed right-of-way. Policy 3.3: ....................................... ; ............... ~ ........ v ......... ~ r ....... sec ...... Land ,T~ ~, .... , o~,:~., ~ ~ ~-~ m ......... :~_ ~, ..... o~,:~., ~ ~ The County shall acquire sufficient amount of right-of-way to facilitate no less than a cross section of (6) traffic lanes, appropriate mm lanes, medians, bicycle and pedestrian features, drainage canals, and shoulder sufficient for pull offs and landscaping areas. Exceptions to the right-of-way standard may be considered when it can be demonstrated, through a traffic capacity analysis, that the maximum number of lanes at build-out will be less than the standard. Policy 3.4: Collier County shall acquire rights-of-way for tr~sportation improvements in fee simple, unless otherwise deter~ned appropriate by the BCC based upon reco~endation of the Transportation Ad~nistrator. 17 Words °* .... t.,~, ..... ~ ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) (II) OBJECTIVE 4: The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, and motorized and non-motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan. Policy 4.1: The County shall, incorporate the Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan by reference and update the Plan as needed. Policy 4.2: The County shall provide for support services, and resources -~d staff within the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization to coordinate the Bicycle/Pedestrian Program. Policy 4.3: The County shall provide an interconnected and continuous bicycle and pedestrian system by making the improvements identified on the 2020 Pathway Facilities Map series as funds permit. The County's pathway construction program should be consistent with the Comprehensive Pathway Plan. The Pathway Advisory Committee ~,~.,~,4 ..... :,~ ....... t- ...... shall, to the maximum extent feasible, provide recommendations on the choice of projects to be included in the pathway construction program, and the order in which they are constructed. Policy 4.4: The County shall annually adopt a 5 Year Pathway Work Program which establishes pathway priorities to retrofit existing streets to accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. Policy 4.5: The County shall, to the greatest extent possible, identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathway Work Program. Policy 4.6: The County shall provide for the safe movement of motorized vehicles through implementation of its Land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances and shall incorporate both bike lanes, and sidewalks and pathways as deemed appropriate in new construction and reconstruction of roadways. Policy 4.7: The County shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically possible and will not result in a safety or operational problem. Policy 4.8: The County shall follow the most current bicycle and pedestrian facilities design and construction standards developed by the Florida Department of Transportation to the extent which is physically and safely possible. OBJECTIVE 5: The County will coordinate the Transportation System development process with the Future Land Use Map. 18 Words ctr'dckthro'Jgh are deletions -Words underlined are additions 8B Policy 5.1: The County Commission will review all rezone requests with consideration of their impact on the overall system, and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or pr~i~cte~ to operate ~ at an unacceptable Level of Serwce w~thin:~fl~&.,vear,~lanmn~;~tmnod, unless specific rmtlgatlng snpulat~ons are approved. Traffic analyses to determine si..~nificant project impact shall use the following to determine the study area: a. On links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the vroiect where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project e~u~l~to~or:.~exce~s ................... 3% of the adopted LOS standard traffic is service volume; c. For all other links the r)roiect traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is i/i~;!i~}~ ~i 5% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Policy 5.2: · ~'~;~; ...... '~ ...... Project traffic that is less than 1% of the adooted oeak hour service volume ret)resents a de minimis impact, Policy 5.3 19 Words struckthrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) (Il) OBJECTIVE 6: The County shall coordinate the Transportation Element with the plans and programs of the State, Region, and other local jurisdictions. Policy 6.1: The Transportation Element shall incorporate to the greatest degree possible, the long range plans of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization. Policy 6.2: The Transportation Element shall consider any and all applicable roadway plans of the City of Naples, City of Marco Island, Florida Department of Transportation, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and Lee County. Policy 6.3: The Transportation Element shall be consistent in its interface into the arterial/collector system within the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island. Policy 6.4: The Transportation Element shall consider the State's adopted Five (5) Year Work Program, the Florida Transportation Plan, and the State Land Development Plan. Policy 6.5 The Collier County MPO's adopted Long Range Plan has identified a need for an interchange at 1-75 and Golden Gate Parkway and a grade separated overpass at Airport Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway A l, 1999.. The above proiects are now in the MPO Transvortation Improvement Pro~ram on t~,~, r,^,:~ r- .... ,, r::.,~ v~. r,.~:,~ r,^~ ...... xx~. m^zram alone with the six-lanine of Golden Gate Parkway. The County shall insure that the three projects mentioned above will be fully coordinated in timing and design OBJECTIVE 7: The County shall develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, as well as encourage safe and convenient on-site traffic circulation. Policy 7.1: ....... ;^~ ^c,~, ..... :~, ~-,~ ~u .............. capacity. Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as ma7 be amended to ensure the protection of the arterial and collector system's capacity and integrity. Policy 7.2: The County shall require the submission of a neighborhood traffic impact assessment as a part of all rezone and conditional use applications. This study will analyze the proposed project's impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. 20 Words °* .... t.,~. ..... ~. ............. u., are deletions -Words underlined are additions 8B Policy 7.3: The County shall implement, through its Zoning Ordinance, the provision of safe and convenient on-site traffic flow and the need for adequate parking for motorized and non-motorized vehicles as a primary objective in review for Planned Unit Developments, Site Development Plans, and other appropriate stages of review in the land development applications process. Policy 7.4: The County shall develop corridor management plans\o~r .... ,.~1~ .r2.~.. ~.~I ~A tt~uo~ Element) that take into consideration urban design and landscaping measures that will promote positive development along the major arterial entrances to the urban area. Such plans shall take into account the Community Character Plan and the initiatives of Smart Growth as the Board of County Commissioners may annually appropriate funding for these plans. Policy 7.5 sequence .......... ~ ...................... v ................. ~, ........ The County shall develop Corridor Access Management Plans. Such plans shall be designed to make median modifications and other operational improvements, including removal of traffic signals, necessary to recapture lost capacity and enhance safety, OBJECTIVE 8: The County shall establish and maintain a "Concurrency Management scheduling, funding, and timely construction of necessary road facilities. System" for the Policy 8.1 Each year, the county will use short term projections of previous years' traffic volume growth to estimate the year in which LOS deficiencies will occur on county roads. This information will be used to prepare the annual update of the county's schedule of Capital Improvements Capital Improvement~.....,~..~' ..... c,~, ..... .~o,~ in a manner that ensures the maintenance of concurrency on road facilities. Policy 8.2 Pursuant to Chapter 163.3180 F.S., and in accordance with the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Land Development Code Division 3.15), development proposals shall be required to submit traffic impact analyses. OBJECTIVE 9: - The County shall encourage neighborhood involvement and safe and pleasant conditions for the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists on neighborhood streets, not classified as arterials or collectors through the implementation of the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). Policy 9.1 The County shall incorporate the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program by reference and update as needed. 21 Words struckthrough are deletions -Words underlined are additions 8B I! Policy 9.2 The County shall provide for support services, resources and staff to coordinate the Program. Policy 9.3 The County shall encourage require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate the convenient movement throughout the !oca! road network. Policy 9.4 The County shall define on a project by project basis, the acceptable amount of rerouted traffic as a result of a traffic management project Policy 9.5 The County shall route through traffic to the major roadways designated in the Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Policy 9.6 The County shall neighborhoods. review impacts on emergency vehicle access or response time to Policy 9.7 Roadways.,o,~"~*^J :.n end:.x A ..v.~...j o ... ............. j ............................. ....... l:~a.l~ c~ ,ha hla~,D identified as collector or arterial facilities are not eligible for the NTMP. Policy 9.8 The County shall cmploy consider a variety of traffic calming devices to achieve the NTMP'S objectives for a project. Such traffic calming devices shall be planned and designed in conformance with sound engineering and planning practices. Primary funding for such plans shall come from the local funding initiatives such as MSTUs or MSTBUs for the area to benefit from the traffic calming. Policy 9.9 To implement the NTMP, certain procedures shall be followed in processing neighborhood traffic management requests in accordance with applicable codes and related policies and within the limits of available resources. At a minimum, the procedures shall provide for: submittal of project proposals; evaluation of proposals by staff; citizen participation in plan development and evaluation; methods of temporarily testing traffic management plans when needed; communication of any test results and specific findings to area residents and affected neighborhood organizations before installation of permanent traffic calming devices; and appropriate County Commission review. OBJECTIVE 10 The County shall encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public. 22 Words "* .... ~'*~' ..... "are deleuons -Words underlined are additions (II) 8B Policy 10.1 The County shall develop a program to examine the maintenance and operational needs of the rural roadway system. This program will address the mobility needs of the rural resident to include the availability of roads for rural-to-urban travel, as well as for hurricane evacuation purposes. Policy 10.2 The County shall continue to improve transit services for the Transportation Disadvantaged in the rural areas through the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC). Policy 10.3 The County shall incorporate herein by reference the Corridor Management Plan for the Tamiami Trail Scenic Highway, which formed part of the application for Scenic Highway designation authorized by the Board of County Commissioners on November 3, 1998. ¸1tl OBJECTIVE 11 The County shall maintain County owned airport facilities as attractive, efficient, safe, and environmentally compatible facilities Policy 11.1 The County shall incorporate by reference the Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and Marco Island Executive Airport Master Plans. Policy 11.2 The Collier County Airport Authority shall determine the most cost effective and efficient means for implementing future facility plans outlined within the airport master plans. (II) (II) (II) OBJECTIVE 12: The County shall encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future. Policy 12.1: The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization, through the Transportation Disadvantaged Program shall assist the local community transportation coordinator in the implementation of the most efficient and effective level of service possible for the transportation disadvantaged. Policy 12.2: The County Transportation Division and the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization shall coordinate the development and maintenance of transit development plans with the ~ Florida Department of Transportation. Policy 12.3 ~ ......':~- Planning Organization Collier Coun ....... ~ -~-~ shall be the managing authority of the Collier Area Transit (CAT) system, 23 Words ctruckthrcugh are deleuons -Words underlined are additions (II) (II) Policy 12.4: The County shall, in recognition that the potential for public transit service between Bonita Springs in Lee County and Naples exists, consider any intergovernmental efforts necessary. Policy 12.5: The County shall participate in the MPO planning process through an interlocal agreement with the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island, and in a Joint Participation Agreement with the FDOT. Policy 12.6: The County will participate in the MPO planning process by ~-;-*~;-: ...... ; ............. ~'~ ................... ~ ......................... as a voting presence on the MPO Board and ~ts' the Technical Advisory Com~ttee (TAC). Policy 12.7: Following the adoption of any transit development plan, the County shall initiate the development of transit right-of-way and comdor protection strategies, including ordinances and policy additions. Policy 12.8: Any adopted transit development plan shall include an acceptable level of service standard for transit facilities. Policy 12.9 The County shall include capital expenditures for any adopted transit development plan in the Capital Improvement Element. Policy 12.10 The County shall incorporate herein by reference the most recent Public Transportation Development Plan and Public Transit Operating Plan adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. on Aug'aat 3, ,aaa n-n ,U~ ~ab';c mm"°;* c, .... ,;_~ o,.~ ~n~-,~n ^.., 1 ........ fl 24 Words -'* ....u+~. ..... ~. ............. u,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions iRd Immokalee Rd m CR 858 m 25 TR - 2 COLLIER COUNTY 2025 LONG RANGE NEEDS PLAN~ (~ ~ L~g ~,©0~ LLR~ 2 - Lanes 4 - Lanes 6 - Lanes 8 - Lanes Interchanges I~ll Water Bodi~q Interstate Highway Roads US Highway County Boundary 2 0 2 4 Miles 26 TR- 3 COLLIER COUNTY FUNCTIONAL CLASS MAP [] MAJOR AIRPORTS I I ! RAILROAD ..... ~ ROUTES .... FUTURE ROADWAY ~ MINOR ARTERIAL ~ PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR ~ RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR URBAN COLLECTOR 0 2 4 8 12 16 ~ -- Miles 27 Data and Analysis Figure 1 * Construction Schedule FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 2002 200a 2O04 2006 2OO6 Description Qtrl Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtrl Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtrl Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtrl Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtrl Qt;2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Livingston Rd. Phase II (Golden Gate Pkwy. to Pine Ridge) Livingston Rd. Phase III (Pine Ridge Rd. to Immokalee Rd.) Livingston Rd. Phase IV (Immokalee Rd. to Lee County Line) Immokalse Rd.(CR 951 to .3r N.) Golden Gate Pkwy (Livingson Rd. to 66th St. and 60~h to Santa Barbara a~vd.) Goodlette-Frank Road (Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road) Vanderbilt Beach Road (Airport Pulling Road to Collier Boulevard) Santa Barbara Boulevard/Logan Blvd. (Davis to Pine Ridge Road) Immokalee Road (US 41 to ~-75) County Barn Road (Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Road) Golden Gate Parkway Grade Separted Overpass (Bear's Paw to Livingston Rd.) Immokalee Road/I-75 Interchange Rattlesnake-Hammock Road(Polly Ave. to Collier Blvd.) Collier Blvd. (Golden Gate Blvd. to Immokalee Rd.) 13th Street SW Improvement (16th Ave. SW to Golden Gate Blvd.) Collier Blvd. (Davis Blvd. S. to US 41 ) Goodlette-Frank Road (Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway} * Represents actual Construction schedule. Encumbrances of funds and lettings typically $0 to 60 days prior to start-up construction. Recently Completed Projects: Livingston Rd. Phase I (Radio Rd. to Golden Gate Prky), Pine Ridge Rd. (Airport Rd. to Logan Blvd.), Imm~kalee Rd. (I-76 to Collier Blvd.), Airport Rd.(Pine Ridge Rd. to Vanderbilt Beach Rd.), Golden Gate Blvd. (Collier Blvd. to Wilson Blvd.). Updated Oct. 03, 2002 Table 1 Transportation 5 Year Work Program (Dollars shown in Thousands) Project ~~kj U ~ Name FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY 06 SUMMARY OF PROJECTS Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Airport Pulling Rd/VBR to PRR 7,022 C/I 7,022 Golden Gate Blvd/951 - Wilson 7,864 R/C/I 7,864 Pine Ridge Road/Airport-Logan 4,809 C/I 4,809 i Livingston Road/GGPKWY-Radio 105 C/I 105 Immokalee Rd/CR951 - Wilson-43rd 30,900 D/PJM/C 3,675 34,575 Immok Rd/175-CR951 5,306 C/I 500 D 5,806 Livingston Road/GGPKWY-PRR 13,094 R/C/I 25 13,119 Livingston Road/PRR-IMMK 25,918 R/C/I 1,260 250 27,428 Golden Gate Pkwy/Airport-SBB 1,225 D/PJI 14,632 C/I 15,857 Golden Gate Pkwy Overpass 1,800 29,974 C/I 625 C/I 200 C/i 32,599 Livingston Road N/Immk - Imperial 11,452 D/PJI/C 400 11,852 ¥anderbilt Bch Rd/Airport-CR951 2,113 D/R/I 24,384 C/I 500 C/I 500 C/I 27,497 lmmokalee Rd/US41-175 7,874 D/R 27,500 C/I 500 C/I 250 C/] 36,124 CR951 Collier BlvdJImmk Rd-GG BI' 250 AM 7,500 C/C 500 C/I 2,700 R 5,005 15,955 Radio Road -Airport-Livingston Rd 25 S 250 AM 275 ~ Livingston Rd/Old 41-N/S LR 2,500 R 2,500 Goodlette Frank Rd/VBR - PRR 15,473 PJC/I 1,250 250 C/I 16,973 Logan Boulevard/PRRto IMMK 250 S 400 D 4,000 R 4,650 ;anta Barbara Blvd/PRR - Davis BIv 4,934 D/R 7,122 30,125 C/I 500 250 42,931 Radio Road Intersection 1,806 C 1,806 Radio Rd -LR-Santa Barbara 25 S 250 S 300 DIM 2,000 C 2,575 Livingston Road Extension TBD 600 D/M/C/I 10,000 i R 10,600 CR951 Collier Blvd/Davis Blvd-GGPKWY 1,900 D 1,900 Goodlette Frank Rd/PRR-GGPKWY 200 S 1,000 D 1,200 County Barn Road/Davis - CR864 226 D/R 1,215 R/M 11,300 C/I 250 12,991 Goodlette Frank Rd/Immk -VBR 1,200 D 5,000 R 6,200 Vanderbilt Beach Rd/CR951-Wilson 300 S 3,000 D 3,300 Green Bird Ext Liv - CR951 400 S 3,500 D 3,900 Immokalee Rd Oil Well to SR29 1,800 S * 3,500 D * 5,300 Vanderbilt Drive Wigg - BBR 1,000 D 6,500 R 7,500 Rattlesnake Polly to CR951 6,800 D/M/C/I 1,100 R 7,900 Davis - Radio to CR951 1,100 D * 7,100 R * 8,200 Collier Blvd (GGB S to Green Blvd.) 1,100 D 1,500 R 4,700 R 7,300 CR 951 (Davis S to US41 4,600 D/M 4,875 R 14,623 R 37,200 E/C/I 61,298 GoodletteFrank(PRR-GGPKWY) 1,200 D 14,700 F_JC/I 15,900 Green Blvd (Collier BIvd - SBB) 600 DIS 970 R 2,930 R 4,500 10% Contingency 3,048 2,241 488 2,485 8,262 Tota, 144,721 I I 108,061 I I 86,8151 I 55,7°6l I 63,27°1 I 478,573 Base Operations & Maintenance Bridge Repairs/Improvements 47 Major Intersection Improvements 971 Intersection Safety/Capacity Impro 1,000 New Traffic Signals 820 Shoulder Safety Program 40 Pathways/Sidewalks Bike Lanes 523 Subtotal Base Operations & Mainten 3,401 Impact Fee Credits Threshold J 2,000 Enhanced Operations & Maintenance Major Roadway Resurfacing/Recol Subtotal Enhanced O & M Collector Roads/Minor Arterial Ro; Advanced ROW Total Funding Request All Funds Total Revenue + Carry Forward New Debt Service 50 50 50 50 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 2,650 2,650 2,650 2,650 2,000 I 2,000 I 2,000 I 2,000 247 4,971 4,000 3,820 24O 723 14,001 10,000 971 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,971 971 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,971 10,148 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 36,548 1,090 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,090 162,331 121,311 100,065 68,956 96,520 86,833 24,730 25,120 25,522 25,936 5,878 12,484 23,106 25,503 549,183 188,141 66,971 Work Plan + Debt Service 162,331 127,189 112,549 92,062 122,023 616,154 BCC Dec. Approved Work Program Variance from Appvd/Revised Key: S = Study D = Design M = Mitigation C = Construction 159,670 106,572 93,490 36,305 50,430 446,467 2,561 14,739 6,575 32,651 46,090 102,716 R = ROW AM = Access Management * = Advanced Reimbursement E = Exfiltration 81t 8B ~j Collier County EXHIBIT A Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan Ulpdate ,.I Prepared for: v.,...~igollier County ,, MPO With funding from the Federal Highway Administration and Florida Department of Transportation Prepared by: WilspnMiller Adopted January 26, 2001 Revised and adopted March 23, 2001 I - Overview 1-1 2 - Public Involvement 2-1 3- Goals & Objectives 3-1 4- Previous 2020 LRTP 4-1 5 - Travel Model Validation 5-1 6- Land Use Forecasts 6-1 7 ~ 2025 Needs Plan 7-1 8- Finance Plan 8-1 9 - Financially Feasible Plan 9-1 10- Interim Year Plans 10-1 11 - Other Plan Components 11-1 12 - Appendices 12-1 ~%-hE:ollier C o u ri_fy Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 I - OVERVIEW Through the Transportation Efficiency Act of the 21 s~ Century, (TEA-21), the Federal Highway Administration requires the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to update its Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) periodically. The purpose of the 2025 Update of the MPO's LRTP is twofold: · To confirm the adopted LRTP's validity and consistency with current and forecasted transportation and land use conditions and trends · To extend the LRTP's forecast horizon to ensure a 20-year planning period Considered a minor update of the adopted 2020 LRTP, the 2025 Update generally addresses only the highway portion of the LRTP. The transit and non- motorized portions of the LRTP are being updated independently of the process and are being included and adopted by reference. TEA-21 recognized that transportation investments affect the economy, environment, and the community's quality of life. TEA-21 included seven factors that replace the 16 metropolitan and 23 state- wide planning factors to be considered in the metropolitan and state-wide planning processes. Specifically, the Collier County MPO LRTP Update process considered applicable strategies and improvements that would achieve the following: * Support the economic vitality of the United States, the states, and metropolitan areas, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency · Increase the safety and security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users * Increase the accessibility and mobility options available to people and freight · Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve quality of life * Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freigh( · Promote efficient system management and operation * Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system PROJECT PROCESS In addition to project coordination/ management and quality control/ assurance activities, the LRTP Update included the following steps, each of which is briefly described: · Public Involvement * Goals and Objectives Evaluation · 2025 Needs Plan Development · Financial Plan Development · 2025 Financially Feasible Plan Development Section 1, Page Collier County Metropolitan Pianning Orgamzation 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted ,January 26, 2001 2 - PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The public involvement/participation process of the LRTP Update included opportunities for public participation in various stages of developing the plan update, including the release of draft/ proposed plan work products to make the plan available for public review and comment. The process included the formulation of a Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) made up of interested citizens and member government representatives. The TCC was responsible for the oversight review and project guidance. At the beginning of the LRTP Update process, a "kick-off" public workshop was held on June 14, 2000 in conjunction with an annual MPO Transportation Fair. During the workshop, MPO staff and consultant described the current adopted LRTP, discussed the process, and invited comments from the public on issues regarding the future transportation system. Two written comments were submitted during that workshop. Both were in regard to the same future improvement--the Collier Boulevard extension from Immokalee Road north to Bonita Beach Road. One comment was in support of the project because of the expressed need for an additional north-south corridor linking Collier and Lee counties' metropolitan areas. The other comment expressed a negative reaction regarding the environmental impacts such a corridor could have. Both comments were considered during the project evaluation process. The specific improvement in question was in the current 2020 Plan. Ultimately, it was chosen to remain in the 2025 Adopted Needs Plan and Financially Feasible Plan. The FDOT has scheduled this project in its adopted work program for a Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) study, which ultimately will Col/ier County Metrooofitan Planning Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 determine what environmental impacts the project may have. During the early stages of project development, a "Road Show" presentation was made to interested groups, specifically the Community Character and Design Committee. The MPO developed and distributed two project newsletters during the course of the study to more than 900 recipients. During the development of the Needs Assessment and Financially Feasible Plan evaluation, presentations were made to the MPO's standing committees: Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). The Draft Needs Plan was presented to a joint meeting of the TAC and CAC on November 29, 2000. It was subsequently presented and endorsed by the MPO on December 6, 2000. On January 18, 2001 MPO staff and the consultant hosted an evening public workshop to present the draft Financially Feasible Plan to the public. Exhibits displayed the Plan Update Process and the Draft Finance Plan and described the proposed needs, Financially Feasible Plans, and an estimate of "Unfunded Needs." Lengthy discussions took place regarding the land use forecasts, revenues available, and the timing of future improvements. Members of the public in attendance expressed concerns over the level of expected growth in the community, as documented in the plan, and asked how projects that were needed but unfunded would be built eventually. The Financially Feasible Plan was presented to a joint meeting of the TAC and CAC on January 24, 2001 and adopted by the MPO on January 26, 2001. A revised Needs Plan also was adopted on January 26, 2001, to include two additional improvements on Marco Island, and the removal of specific grade separation locations that were shown on earlier plans. Section 2, Page 1 "'-~--h Collier County Long Range Transportation Plan Update 202 8 B As a result of revised revenue estimates resulting from Collier County's action to reauthorize a local option gas tax, the TAC/CAC recommended an amended Financially Feasible Plan to the MPO for consideration on March 21, 2001. The MPO adopted the Amended 2025 Financially Feasible Plan on March 23, 2001. The committees solicited and considered public input during the adoption (and readoption) process. Members of several neighborhood associations expressed concern regarding the impact of several new corridors under consideration. As a result of those concerns, the MPO and the consultant removed specific roadway alignments from the proposed plans in favor of a future corridor study designation. Following final adoption, copies of the published plan will be made available to the public in both printed and electronic form. Copies will be provided for use in public libraries. In addition, portions of the plan will be made available on the MPO's webs/re. MPO staff will continue to give presentations to the public as requested. Sect/on 2, Page 2 Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 - 3 - GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The project included a significant effort to reevaluate and confirm the validity of the MPO's adopted Goals and Objectives. As appropriate, new Goals and Objectives and recommended modifications to current Goals and Objectives were developed. The TCC reviewed a Technical Memorandum of the recommended changes/additions/ deletions. The revised Goals and Objectives are contained in the following pages. Copies of the Technical Memorandum are available upon request. Coflier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 LRTf~ Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 Section 3, Page 1 Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 8B COLLIER COUNTY MPC 2025 LRTP UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES corridors identified in the adopted Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan that are improved, should be planned and designed to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians. Goal 1: To develop a balanced and integrated multimodal transportation system Policy 1.3.3-- The MPO will prioritize the programming of expenditures for transportation enhancement activities to expand and enhance bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Balanced and Integrated Multimodal Transportation System Objective 1.1--To identify transportation alternatives which will provide multimodal transportation options, such as transit, bicycle and/or pedestrian options; for the movement of people and goods. Policy 1.1.1-- The MPO will evaluate and consider multimodal improvement alternatives that enhance the attractiveness and that encourage the use of alternative modes. Policy 1.3.4-- When estimating financial resources available for major transportation facilities and services, the MPO will set aside $500,000 per year of the available annual State/federal revenues for the construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Efficient Movement of People and Goods Objective 1.4--To maintain the level of service (LOS) standards adopted in local governmental comprehensive plans for all modes of travel. Policy 1.4.1-- The MPO will evaluate and consider the existing and projected operating LOS of area facilities when prioritizing the programming of federal/State transportation revenues. Objective 1.2--To encourage the use of alternative modes Policy 1.2. 1--The MPO will evaluate and consider improvement altematives that enhance intermodal linkages and minimize conflicts between transportation modes. Objective 1.3--To expand and enhance bicycle and pedestrian facilities, to the extent practical, Policy 1.3. 1-- The MPO will evaluate and consider bicycle and pedestrian needs, as identified in the Colfier County Comprehensive Pa th way Plan, when developing and prioritizing transportation projects. Objective 1.5--To minimize travel time and delay due to congestion. Policy 1.5. 1-- The MPO will explore the feasibility of implementing various transportation demand management (TDM) measures to relieve congestion during peak periods of travel. Policy 1.5.2--The MPO will use the Congestion Management System (CMS)-to identify transportation congestion needs and to help establish priorities. Policy 1.3.2--Afl new corridors, or those Section 3, Page 2 Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 ' -xCollier County Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 Objective 1.6--To minimize circuitous travel. Policy 1.6. 1-- The MPO will evaluate and consider improvement alternatives that increase the linkages and interconnections of major roads, reduce circuitous travel patterns, and relieve congestion during peak periods. Objective 1.7--To reduce dependence on single-occupant vehicles. Policy 1.7.1-- The MPO will explore the feasibility of implementing transportation demand management (TDM) measures to reduce reliance on single-occupant vehicles. Policy 1.7.2--The MPO will explore the feasibility of implementing park-n-ride lots and van-pool programs to reduce reliance on single-occupant vehicles. Objective 1.8--To maintain or improve the efficiency of existing roadways. Policy 1.8. 1-- The MPO will support the programming of State/federal and local funds for transportation system management (TSM) measures and Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) initiatives to enhance the efficiency of existing roadways, especially in capacity constrained corridors. Objective 1.9--To provide a multi-modal transportation system with sufficient connections to adjacent counties to facilitate regional, as well as local; travel. Policy 1.9.1-- The MPO will evaluate the expanding need for inter-county and inter- regional facility connections that will support the inter-local and regional travel demands. Policy 1.9.2-- The MPO will support the development of inter-county public transportation service. Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 8B I Objective 1.10--To maintain and enhance the efficient movement of goods. Policy 1.10. 1-- The MPO will evaluate the increasing need for improved inter-county and inter-regional facilities that support the efficient movement of goods and services. Policy 1. lO.2---the MPO will utilize the results/output of its Congestion Management System to assist in identifying transportation needs. Safe Movement of People and Goods Objective 1.11--To provide the safest possible service for all modes of travel. Policy 1.12. 1--The MPO will use the Safety Management System (SMS), once established, to identify transportation safety needs. Policy 1.1 I. I-- The MPO will actively participate in the Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST) program. Policy 1.11.2-- The MPO will evaluate and consider the accident/crash data of area facilities when prioritizing the programming of federal/State transportation revenues. Objective 1.12--To minimize vehicle- vehicle and vehicle-pedestrian conflicts. Policy 1.12. 1--Afl new or improved corridors should be planned and designed in accordance with appropriate access management standards to reduce potential conflict points. Policy 1.12.2 --All new or improved facilities should be designed to reduce accident potential through improved physical design and street lighting. Objective 1.13--To enhance pedestrian and bicycle education and safety. Policy 1.13. 1--The MPO will comply with the goals, objectives and policies related to Section 3, Page 3 ~'~.-\iCollier County ,8B Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 pedestrian and bicycle education and safety in the adopted Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan. Goal 2: To develop a financially feasible and cost-effective transportation system Hurricane Evacuation/Disaster Preparedness Objective 1.14,--To provide adequate transportation facilities to accommodate hurricane evacuation requirements and to reduce the occurrence of "bottlenecks" along hurricane evacuation routes. Policy 1.14. 1--The MPO shall consider hurricane evacuation route needs in evaluating long-range transportation altematives. Policy 1.14.2--The MPO shall consider the regional and State-wide importance of interconnecting hurricane evacuation routes with adjacent urban and non-urban areas. Policy 1.14.3--- The MPO shall coordinate with the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and local/State Emergency Management Officials in prioritizing improvements to help meet hurricane evacuation and disaster recovery needs. Affordability Objective 2.1 --To develop an affordable transportation system that accommodates future year 2025 travel demand, to the extent practical, while not exceeding projected financial resources. Policy2. 1.1--When estimating financial resources available for major transportation facilities and services, the MPO will set aside $300,000 per year for transportation enhancement activities and $500,000 of the available annual revenues for transportation system management (TSM) measures. Policy 2. 1.2-- The MPO will conduct a "LOS C" study to determine the affordability of raising the minimum acceptable standards on area roads from LOS "D" & "E" to LOS "C". Incident Management and Emergency Response Objective 1.15--To provide an efficient and safe response to incidents (accidents/ crashes) that addresses emergency services, law enforcement and traffic management criteria. Poficy 1.15. 1--The MPO will assist in the development of a County-wide Incident Management System. Policy 1.15.2-- The MPO will support the establishment of an Emergency Medical Service Station to be located at the 175/SR- 29 interchange. Objective 2.2--To identify the transportation system that accommodates future year 2025 travel demand without regard to exceeding projected financial resources, and to determine the increased levels of transportation revenues needed to accommodate the needs assessment within the planning period. Policy 2.2.1-- The MPO will update the Long-Range Transportation Plan to extend the horizon year to 2025 and to confirm the validity of the land use and transportation trends and conditions contained in the Plan. ~ Objective 2.3--To identify and evaluate existing, new, and innovative funding sources necessary to support the transportation needs during the planning period. Sect/on 3, Page 4 Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adooted January 26, 2001 '~%\C:ollier County Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 8B Policy 2.3.1-- The MPO will identify needed revenues to support the 2025 Needs Assessment, and identify funding options to address any deficiencies. Cost-Effectiveness Urban Area Buildout Study when identifying future right-of-way requirements. Policy 2. 7.2-- The MPO will conduct a "buildout network" study to determine maximum through-lane configuration for area roads. Objective 2.4---To maximize the cost- effectiveness of proposed improvements and alternative modes of travel. Policy 2.4.1--The MPO will consider life- cycle costs in evaluating transportation alternatives. Goal 3: To develop a convenient and accessible transportation system Accessibility Objective 2.5--To identify and support opportunities for joint public/private participation in transportation improvements. Policy 2.5. 1-- The MPO will identify, evaluate and consider improvement alternatives and funding initiatives that promote the use of joint public/private participation. Objective 3.1--To maximize ac~cessibility to transportation facilities and services for all modes of travel. Policy 3. 1.1-- The MPO will evaluate and consider the level of multimodal accessibility of improvement alternatives. Objective 2.6--To maximize the use and operational efficiency of existing transportation facilities before expanding or constructing new facilities. Policy 2.6. 1-- The MPO will explore the feasibility of implementing various transportation system management (TSM) and transportation demand management (TDM) measures to enhance the use and efficiency of existing roadways. Policy 2.6.2-- The MPO will explore the feasibility of implementing various Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) initiatives that are consistent with State and Regional ITS architecture. Objective 2.7--To identify future right-of- way requirements and encourage the preservation of future rights-of-way. Policy 2. 7. 1-- The MPO will consider the findings and conclusions of the Naples Colfier County Metropolitan Planning Organization Objective 3.2--To maximize accessibility to intermodal transfer points, such as airports. Policy 3.2. I-- The MPO will evaluate and consider the need for improving access to intermodal transfer points, such as airports. Objective 3.3--To maximize accessibility to major travel destinations, activity centers and public facilities inside and outside Collier County. Policy 3.3. 1-- The MPO will evaluate and consider the need for maximizing access to major travel destinations, activity centers and public facilities inside and outside the County. Objective 3.4 --To provide transportation options for non-motorists, as well as motorists, including elderly and handicapped Sect/on 3, Page 5 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 ,c 8B '-'x.\ :oilier County · P O---q Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 persons, to ensure that all person have access to transportation facilities and services and, thus, to employment, shopping and other opportunities. Policy 3.4.1--The MPO will support the implementation of an appropriate public transportation system, to be operated and funded to meet the needs of County residents and visitors. Goal 4: To develop a transportation system that maintains or enhances the environment and quality of life Environmental Protection Objective 4.1--To minimize adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive lands and waters. Policy 4.1.1-- The MPO will evaluate and give consideration to improvement alternatives that minimize adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive lands and waters when considering the need to add capacity to the transportation network. Objective 4.2--To minimize adverse noise and air quality impacts. Policy 4.2.1-- The MPO will evaluate and give consideration to improvement altematives that minimize adverse noise impacts to adjacent lands and the impacts to air qua#ty when considering the need to add capacity to the transportation network. Objective 4.3--To conserve energy through reduced gas/fuel consumption. Policy 4.3.1--The MPO will evaluate and give consideration to improvement alternatives that conserve energy through reduced motor fuel consumption. Objective 4.4--To minimize adverse impacts on cultural, historical and architectural landmarks and features. Policy 4.4. 1-- The MPO will evaluate and give consideration to improvement alternatives that minimize adverse impacts to cultural, historical and architectural landmarks and features. Neighborhood Preservation Objective 4.5--To preserve the-integrity of established neighborhoods. Policy 4.5. 1-- The MPO will evaluate and give consideration to improvement alternatives that minimize the need to divide or separate existing neighborhoods or communities. Objective 4.6--To consider alternative improvements that minimize through traffic on local neighborhood streets. Policy 4.6. 1--The MPO has developed a model Neighborhood Traffic Management Program and will encourage the funding and implementation of Neighborhood Traffic Management Programs by local jurisdictions. Policy 4.6.2-- The MPO will evaluate and give consideration to improvement alternatives that minimize the impacts on existing local streets. Objective 4.7--To minimize the displacement of existing residences. Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 Section 3, Page 6 Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 Policy 4.7. 1--The MPO will evaluate and give consideration to improvement alternatives that minimize the displacement of existing residences. Objective 4.12--To enhance existing and proposed freight transportation corridors. Objective 4.8--To minimize adverse impacts on public facilities, such as schools, parks and recreational facilities. Policy 4.8. 1-- The MPO will evaluate and give consideration to improvement alternatives that minimize the impacts on public facilities, such as schools, parks and recreational facilities. Economic Preservation Objective 4.9--To preserve, to the extent feasible, the integrity of established business and employment centers. Policy 4.9. 1-- The MPO will evaluate and consider improvement altematives that minimize the negative impacts on existing businesses. Policy 4. 12.1--The MPO will evaluate and consider improvement altematives that maintain or enhance the existing or proposed freight movement corridors. Goal 5: To ensure public involvement, intergovernmental coordination and comprehensive planning during the long-range transportation plan update Policy 4.9.2-- The MPO will support maintenance of traffic (MOT) plans for new construction projects that minimize the impact to adjacent businesses. Public Involvement Objective 4.1 O--To minimize business displacements. Policy 4. 10. 1-- The MPO will evaluate and consider improvement alternatives that minimize the displacement of existing businesses. Objective 5.1--To provide early and continuous public involvement opportunities. Policy 5. 1.1-- The MPO will comply with the adopted Public Involvement Process Manual. Objective 4.11--To preserve and enhance aesthetic features in existing and proposed transportation corridors. Policy 4. 11.1-- The MPO will program expenditures for transportation enhancement activities to enhance the aesthetics, including landscaping and signage, in existing and proposed transportation corridors. Objective 5.2--To provide adequate public notice of the time and place of public workshops and hearings for the Long-Range Transportation Plan Update and subsequent amendments. Policy 5.2. 1-- The MPO will comply with the adopted Public Involvement Process Manual. Objective 5.3--To make available to the Section 3, Page 7 Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organtzation 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 ~%\iSollier County P Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 public all pertinent information regarding key issues in the Long-Range Transportation Plan. Policy 5.3.1-- The MPO will comply with the adopted Public Involvement Process Manual. Objective 5.4--To allow adequate time for public review and comment at key decision points during the Long-Range Transportation Plan Update. Policy 5.4.1--The MPO will comply with the adopted Public Involvement Process Manual. Objective 5.5--To solicit and consider public and expert opinions about the Long- Range Transportation Plan Update. Policy 5.5. 1-- The MPO will comply with the adopted Public Involvement Process Manual. Objective 5.6---To implement, as appropriate to MPO planning actions, the Community Impact Assessment (CIA) process. Policy 5.6.1-- The MPO will take steps to integrate the CIA process concepts into the MPO's adopted Public Involvement Process Manual. Po#cy 5.6.2-- The MPO will evaluate and consider the effects of improvement alternatives on the community and its quafity of life. Objective 5.7--To include the CIA process as in integral part of project planning and development. Policy 5. 7. 1--The MPO will actively involve all affected parties and stakeholders in an open, cooperative, and collaborative planning process beginning at the earliest stages and continuing throughout the project. Policy 5.7.2--The MPO will provide Coflier County Metropolitan Plannir~g Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26. 2001 documentation of the current and anticipated social environment of a geographical area with and without the project improvement. Policy 5. 7. 3-- The assessment will include mobility, safety, employment effects, relocation, isolation and other community issues. Intergovernmental Coordination Objective 5.8--To facilitate local government participation during the Long- Range Transportation Plan Update. Policy 5.8. 1-- The MPO will utilize a Technical Coordinating Committee, including Iocal government repres_entatives, to coordinate the development of the Long- Range Transportation Plan Update and future amendments. Objective 5.9--To coordinate development of the Long-Range Transportation Plan activities (amendments, updates, etc.) with FDOT and other jurisdictions and MPOs in adjacent counties. Poficy 5.9. 1--The MPO will utilize a Technical Coordinating Committee, including representatives of FDOT and other jurisdictions and MPOs in adjacent counties, to coordinate the development of the Long-Range Transportation Plan Update and future amendments. Comprehensive Planning Objective 5.1 O--To consider the interrelationship between transportation and land use policy decisions and the effects of one on the other. Policy 5. 10.1--The MPO will evaluate land use decisions of member local governments and adjacent local governments with respect to the impacts such decisions may have on the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Section 3, Page 8 Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Objective 5.11--To consider the potential effects of alternative land use scenarios on the proposed Long-Range Transportation Plan and advise decision- makers of potential modifications to existing land use plans that may reduce travel demand or provide other transportation-related benefits. Policy 5.11.1--At the request of local governments, the MPC will evaluate the impacts of alternative land use scenarios on the 2025 Needs Assessment and Financially-Feasible Plans. Objective 5.12--To minimize disruption to existing and planned land uses. Policy 5. 12. 1--The MPC will consider improvement alternatives that minimize the disruption to existing and planned land uses. Objective 5.13--To review and consider the findings and conclusions of relevant area studies. Policy 5. 13. 1-- The MPO will consider the findings and conclusions of the Golden Gate Estates Transportation Study, and the Immokalee Mobility Studyin the development of the Long-Range Transportation Plan Updates and future amendments. Objective 5.14--To maintain, to the extent feasible, consistency between the MPO's Long-Range Transportation Plan and the Growth Management Transportation Elements of the local member governments. Policy 5. 14.1-- The MPO will evaluate changes to the LRTP and Local Government Transportation Elements and assist in the resolution of any conflicts or inconsistencies. Coflier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 LF?TP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 Section 3, Page 9 ~',..xi3ollier County Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 4 - PREVIOUS 2020 LRTP The Collier County MPO LRTP was last updated in December 1995, with the planning horizon and land use forecasts extended to the year 2020. The permanent county-wide population of 393,100 for the year 2020 was used to forecast traffic volume. The LRTP was amended in February 1998 as part of the interchange justification process for the new interchange at Golden Gate Parkway and 1-75. Although it retained the title "2020 Financially Feasible Plan," it was designed to serve a permanent county-wide population of 426,300, which is the predicted population in the year 2024 and the interchange's design year. The LRTP (see Exhibit 1 on the following page) was amended again in December 1999 to include several minor additions and deletions of roadway links. However, it retained the same predicted permanent population of 426,300. Section 4, Page 1 Colh'er County Metropolitan Ptann/ng Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26. 2001 EXHIBIT 1 - PREVIOUS COLLIER COUNTY 2020 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - NUMBER OF LANES Radio Rd Number of Directional Lanes by Color 1 ~2 3 Immokalee Rd ~ _~ WilspnMiller Immokalee Rd Immokalee Area 4-2 '~',..~,collierCoudy Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 '~ 5 - TRAVEL MODEL VALIDATION One of the most frequently used tools in long-range transportation planning is the travel demand estimation model. Computer models simulate future traffic conditions by converting land use data into travel demand and then applying that demand to the simulated transportation network which represents the actual or proposed roadways. These models allow users to identify capacity problems (congestion) easily and test applied changes to the model (e.g., adding additional lanes) by running the simulation again. This iterative process of testing, analyzing, and re-testing is a strategic part of the long-range transportation planning process. To produce reasonable results during the modeling process, the model itself must be able to simulate real world conditions. This is accomplished through a validation process that is meant to ensure that the model accurately simulates the conditions "on the ground" in the validation year. An integral part of the 2025 LRTP Update process involved revalidating the MPO's travel demand estimation model. In Florida, all metropolitan areas utilize the Florida Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS). In July-August 2000, Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan (PBS&J) and the MPO revalidated the Collier County FSUTMS model under contract to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District One. Several models had been developed previously and validated for Collier County's 1990 conditions; therefore, the purpose of this exercise was to review and refine the most recent model to prepare the LRTP Update. A summary of the results and conclusions follows. The entire Final Validation Report, dated August 2000, is on file in the Collier County MPO offices. Co/her County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 L R TP Update--Final Report Adooted January 26, 2001 8B !! The 1990 Collier County FSUTMS model includes all of Collier County and a portion of Lee County. As part of the revalidation effort, the model study area was revised to delete the Fort Myers Beach area. Additional revisions included the following: * Review/refinement of the two-digit highway network coding * Implementation of a new speed and capacity table * Inclusion of turn prohibitors and toll facility parameters * Refinement of screenlines and traffic count data The 1990 Collier County FSUTMS model was validated in accordance with FDOT methodologies and accuracy star~dards using 1990 land use data from Collier County and 1990 traffic count data from both Collier County and FDOT. As stated above, the model incorporated the latest two-digit area type and facility-type coding methods as well as default speeds, capacities, and variable factors based on the 1998 FDOT Level of Service (LOS) Handbook. It also included a specialized dual trip generation program used throughout Southwest Florida. This program modified trip rates for seasonal residents to remove potential sources of bias in accordance with average classifications from the 1992 Lee County Travel Characteristics Study (LCTCS). The internal-external and external-external trip estimates were modified based on knowledge of the area and logical travel patterns. Special generators were reviewed and refined to achieve better replication of 1990 ground counts and for consistency with the 1990 Lee County model validation update. Instead of using penalties at the Collier/Lee County line, K-factors were included in the model to better replicate travel patterns throughout the study area. Finally, adjustments were made to the default free-flow speeds and to locations of some centroids and centroid connectors. Section 5, Page 1 ~'""hC°llier~l!!~ MPC°6 __ Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 The model validation process included an evaluation of a number of key indicators that reflect the overall and specific performance characteristics of the model. Some of the most crucial statistics for model validation include the following: * Volume-over-count vehicle miles of travel (VMT) ratios · Volume-over-count vehicle hours of travel (VHT) ratios · Volume-over-count volume ratios · Volume-over-count ratios along screenlines The goal of model validation is for ratios to be as close to 1.00 as possible for each area type and facility type in the network. An additional statistic, root mean squared error (RMSE), is another good indicator of the overall error in the model by various categories based on roadway count volumes. The lower the percent RMSE, the more likely it is that the model is accurately replicating existing traffic counts. FDOT assignment validation standards for volume-over-count VMT, volume-over- count VHT, and volume-over-count volume ratios include an accuracy level of +/- 5 percent for overall area-wide statistics, and a +/- 15 percent accuracy level for each category of area type, facility type, and number of lanes. As shown in the Final Validation Report Table 5-3 (see Appendices), all categories, except collectors, in the Collier County model fell within these guidelines. Collectors also were a problem in previous validations of the Collier model. Three levels of accuracy are recommended by FDOT for evaluating screenlines: · +/- 20 percent for screenlines under 50,000 vehicles per day (VPD) · +/- 15 percent for screenlines with 50,000-75,000 VPD · +/- 10 percent for screenlines with counts greater than 75,000 VPD Final Validation Report Figure 2-4 and Table 5-4 (see Appendices) depict the screenline locations and various volume- to-count ratios along those screenlines. Most screenlines in the Collier County model fell within the FDOT recommended accuracy levels, except for the Lee/Collier county line, the Everglades, and several interchange screenlines. As has been the case with previous validations, the model still over-assigned trips crossing the county line; however, the latest effort was much closer to acceptable parameters than in previous models. The screenline at the Everglades is difficult to validate because the volumes are extremely Iow and few alternative roadways exist. Interchange screenlines also are difficult to validate. Ramps tend to be the hardest facility to replicate due to the micro- simulated nature of these trips. Finally, the RMSE statistics are very important because they represent the overall error in the model. Volume-to- count ratios alone may mask a problem, such as significantly over-assigned and under-assigned roadways within the same group averaging out to a 1.00 ratio. FDOT recommended RMSE accuracy ranges by count group and the results of the current and previous validation are depicted in Final Validation Report Table 5-5 (see Appendices). Thirteen validation runs were conducted on the 1990 Collier County FSUTMS model. Overall, the validation update effort was successful. Incorrect area-type and facility-type coding errors were corrected, penalties along the county line and on several interchange ramps were removed, and the screenlines were refined. In most cases, the model performed better than in previous validation efforts. The Final Validation Report concluded that the model validation met or exceeded FDOT validation criteria and would be a good tool for use in forecasting future travel demand in Collier County in the 2025 LRTP Update. Section 5, Page 2 Co/her County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 Lt~TP Update--Final Report AcloptedJanua~/26 2001 ~-'-,.N, iS oilier Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 8B 6 - 2025 LAND USE FORECAST Travel demand estimates for the year 2025 were developed using the MPO's travel demand model. This model depends on a forecast of various land use variables, such as the number of single family and multifamily dwellings and the number of retail and service employees that will exist in some future year-- in this case, 2025. The MPO staff developed the residential land use forecast of the model variables based on US Census and Collier County Certificate of Occupancy records for residential development. While under contract to the FDOT, PBS&J developed the employment variables for the MPO. Collier County used the Florida Bureau of Economic & Business Research (BEBR) projections to develop year 2025 control totals. Table 1 shows the predicted growth and percentage changes in various control totals between the calculated 1998 base year condition and the year 2025 projections. Exhibits 2A and 2B at the end of this section depict the growth in housing and employment between 1990 and 2025 by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). Ehibits 3A and 3B depict total housing and employment by TAZ. Forecast Data Sets Preparation The future land use inputs to the travel demand model generally are contained in two separate data files: * ZDATAl--residential and hotel/motel uses Table I - Collier County Totals, 1998 and 2025 (estimated) Land Use Vadable 1998 2025 Percentage Increase Single Family Dwelling Units 55,578 123,656 122 % Single Family Population 125,303 293,510 134 % Multifamily Dwelling Units 73,694 130,749 77 % Multifamily Population 83,650 159,490 91% Total Population 208,953 453,000 117 % Industrial Employees (SIC #s 1-39) 21,004 55,095 162 % Commercial Employees (SIC #s 50-59) 32,129 60,124 87 % Service Employees (SIC #s 40-49, 60-99) 59,078 105,683 79 % Total Employees 112,211 220,902 97 % Source: Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization Oct. 2000 * ZDATA2--employment and school enrollment Each ZDATA file contains land use data values for each TAZ within the study area. Buildout dwelling unit projections were used to develop interim horizon year estimates at the TAZ level. These were provided by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning section of the Planning Services Department in early 1999 as part of an investigation into the effect of density reduction measures on traffic volumes. ZDA TA 1 The ZDATA1 file includes a variety of land use variables associated with residential (single family and multifamily) and hotel/motel land uses. Population per dwelling unit (single family and multifamily), vacancy, and auto ownership rates were based on 1990 census data. Rates were borrowed from adjacent zones that had population in 1990 to determine rates for zones without data. Section 6, Page 1 Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 L RTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26 2001 ~'%~Collier County Buildout projections provided by Collier County were for dwelling units by type, without population figures. When buildout dwelling unit estimates were multiplied by the given occupancy rates, the total county- wide population was computed at 733,242. In 17 zones, 1990 population totals exceeded 1998 values, which were the result of annual accounting of certificates of occupancy. The 1998 values were left alone because these were regarded as more reliable. The 1998 estimated population total was 208,953. In 34 zones, 1998 population estimates exceeded buildout estimates. In these zones, 1998 numbers replaced buildout numbers. The county-wide population total estimate at buildout was 746,709. The Tourism Alliance Council of Collier County provided a year 2000 ground count of hotel and motel rooms. The Collier County Tourist Development Coordinator's opinion was that the market for hotel/motel rooms essentially was saturated; thus, the total of 7,769 rooms noted in 2000 would not increase substantially. For that reason, the year 2000 totals by TAZ are used in all of the future scenario year data sets. Inspection of the 1990 validation set revealed a typical assumption of 2.3 people per occupied room; this was used throughout the TAZs. Percent of rooms occupied was assumed at 100 percent in the peak season months. The Collier County Comprehensive Planning section provided future population estimates in July 2000. These estimates assume a BEBR high growth rate for the first five years, and the medium range growth rate thereafter: Year Population 2005 288,000 2010 326,000 2015 366,000 2020 408,000 2025 453, 000' extrapolated by MPO staff These county-wide control totals were appr~rfinn~.d intn th~. TAZ.~ u.~ing th~. Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 L~TP Update--Fim~l Report Adopted January 26, 200t method approved by the MPC in January 1996. The description of this method is contained in the support document to the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The Lee County MPC provided data for Lee County TAZs included in the study area for model consistency purposes. ZDA TA2 The ZDATA2 file includes land use variables associated with employment and school enrollment. Employment data for buildout (also provided by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department) was provided for "industrial" and "commercial" classifications. The "commercial" total had to be apportioned into the service and commercial classifications used in the ZDATA file format. An examination of the 1998 data by TAZ revealed that 38 TAZs contained higher employment estimates in 1990 than in 1998. In the following TAZs, the 1998 employment contents were replaced with the 1990 values deemed more reasonable: * #305 * #187 * #188 · #124 This changed the 1998 employment total from 111,016 to 112,211. Of the remaining 34 zones in which 1990 totals exceeded 1998 totals, a manual check suggested more reliability in the 1998 numbers. Therefore, these do not change. Buildout and 1998 employment totals for each TAZ were compared. In 114 zones, 1998 values exceeded buildout numbers. Buildout estimates were changed to match the 1998 numbers in those zones, changing the buildout employment total from 197,689 to 220,902. In 1998, a population total of 208,953 and employment total of 112,211 yielded a ratio of .537 employees per capita. This Section 6, Page 2 "',.--h, Collier County Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025' same ratio was 0.49 in 1990. When the latter ratio is multiplied by the 2025 population estimate of 453,000, it yields an employee control total of 221,970--a reasonable ratio for this planning effort. It should be noted that because the latest County estimate of employment at buildout is less than predicted for 2025, any subsequent studies that extend the horizon year before 2025 should examine the validity of the County buildout employment projections. MPO staff prepared an inventory of 1998 school enrollment numbers for each TAZ. The Collier County School District staff provided the MPO with student estimates forecast for the year 2020 for most schools. For schools not on the 1998 school board list, growth (or decline) rates for similar schools were borrowed to produce 2020 estimates for all schools. Enrollment trends then were projected to the year 2025. Employment and school enrollment forecast data for Lee County TAZs were provided by the Lee County MPO. are included in the Appendices. The last part of the forecasting effort involved developing "external trip" estimates for each forecast year. External travel models estimate trips traveling into or out of the study area. External trips are made of two components: internal-to- external (iE) trips, which are found in the ZDATA 4 file, and external-to-external (EE) trips, which are found in the EETRIPS file. EE trips are commonly referred to as "through" trips, with both beginning and ending points outside of the study area. IE trips differ in that one of the end-points of trip is within the study area and the other end-point is outside the study area. A map depicting the location of the external stations in the model and the ZDATA4 and EETRIPS contents for each forecast year are included in the Appendices. Special Generators (ZDATA3) and External Trips (ZDATA4 & EETRIPS) In addition to the housing and employment data that are used to generate trips in the travel demand modeling process, special generators are often used where normal trip generation variables do not adequately address the generation characteristics of a specific TAZ. Typically, special generators are used for airports, colleges, regional shopping centers, and parks and recreation areas. Previous Collier County models have included special generators for additional uses, such as the 1-75 Exit 15 Activity Center, the Naples Community Hospital, and the Fort Myers-Naples Dog Track. Adjustments were made to the ZDATA3 file during the revalidation effort and extrapolated as appropriate for the forecast years. The ZDATA3 file contents Section 6, Page 3 Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 Z 6-4 0 Z 0 Z 0 X LIJ 000000 000000 Og~~ ~8B I~ I-- Z 0 0 ! 6-6 [~oooooo O0 oooooo l.- Z mml 0 Z 0 0 I mmm X 6-7 ~ %\C:ollier County Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 8 B 7 - 2025 NEEDS PLAN DEVELOPMENT The first step in developing the Financially Feasible Plan was the development of a "needs-based" plan, unconstrained by financial limitations. Using the previously developed and adopted 2020 Needs Assessment as a starting point, a new 2025 Needs Assessment (also called the Needs Plan) was prepared based on the updated 2025 land use forecast. A Needs Plan was developed for the 2025 horizon year as a prerequisite to developing the 2025 Financially Feasible Plan. As part of supplemental work to this project, additional financially feasible plans will be developed for 2020, 2010, and 2005 year timeframes to assist local decision- makers in planning the future staging of improvements. As part of developing a needs-based plan, two alternative networks were developed and tested simultaneously. Both were based on the previously adopted 2020 Needs Plan. The two alternative networks differed only in their treatment of the proposed extension of Livingston Road south of Radio Road to Davis Boulevard. The base alternative assumed the same alignment adopted in the 2020 Financially Feasible Plan, an alignment that curves southwest from the intersection of Livingston Road at Radio Road and connects to North Road at its intersection with Airport Road. Alternative 1 provided for the testing of a direct north/ south extension of Livingston Road from Radio Road to Davis Boulevard. An analysis of the traffic assignments (model output) of both alternatives revealed a number of positive and negative impacts to both alternatives. In essence, no clear choice could be made based upon traffic volumes. The majority of public comment involved these alternatives. Therefore, it was recommended that a corridor study of the area between Radio Road and Davis Boulevard be conducted to determine if, and where, a new corridor alignment was viable. A corridor study area was designated on the 2025 Needs Plan map covering the area between Radio Road and Davis Boulevard from Airport Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard. In developing the two alternative plans, a number of other minor modifications were tested, primarily involving the addition of small collector roads that improved access to and between arterial roadways. A number of these suggested improvements were recommended through the work of the Community Character and Design Study. In total, four different network scenarios were developed and tested. All LOS testing was performed using the FDOT Generalized LOS Maximum Service Volume Tables for the applicable roadway type. For consistency in the analyses, all roadway service volume standards in the future year(s) were assumed to be LOS "D," even though the County has adopted LOS "E" on several arterial links. FDOT LOS Tables are expressed in terms of annual average daily traffic (AADT) and the FSUTMS model output is expressed in terms of peak season weekday traffic (PSWDT). This made it necessary to convert the FDOT AADT service volumes to PSWDT for ease and speed of comparing/evaluating model output from an extensive number of model runs. AADT was converted to PSWDT by dividing the appropriate service volume by the Model Output Conversion Factor (MOCF) of .89 (Soume: 1999 FDOT Peak Season Factoring Category Report). The service volumes used in the analysis are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Service Volumes Number Lanes Roadway Classification AADT PSWDT 2-Lane Class-1 Arterial 16,600 18,652 4-Lane Class-1 Arterial 35,000 39,326 6-Lane Class-1 Arterial 52,500 58,988 8-Lane Class-1 Arterial 64,400 72,360 4-Lane Freeway 66,200 74,382 6-Lan e Freeway 101,600 114,158 2-Lane Rural @ 55mph w/turn-bays 13,600 15,281 4-Lane Rural Multilane Div. w/turn-bays 51,000 57,303 4-Lane Rural Freeway 56,200 63,146 Section 7, Page 1 Collier County Metropolitan Ptann/ng Organization 2025 LRTP Update~Final Report Adopted January 26r 2001 ~'x-~Collier County Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 The draft Needs Plan was approved by the MPO on December 8, 2000. It generally depicts the improved network that must be in place by 2025 to maintain an acceptable LOS on those facilities that are not "policy-constrained." Policy-constrained facilities are those roadways which, by public policy or by their physical nature, are not intended to be improved. Therefore, these roadways must be expected to accept greater levels of congestion than otherwise would be permitted. On January 26, 2001 as part of the Financially Feasible Plan, the MPO also approved a modification to the Needs Plan to include two improvements to Marco Island. The final Needs Plan, depicted in the map set as Exhibits 4-6, was readopted on March 23, 2001. The entire list of the Needs Plan Improvements are shown in Table 3, totaling more than $1.4 billion. Coflier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 ,8B Section 7, Page 2 EXHIBIT 4 - COLLIER COUNTY 2025 NEEDS MODEL - NUMBER OF LANES Immokalee Rd Radio Rd Davis Bird Number of Directional Lanes by Color 1 2 3 4 Corridor Study WilspnMiller lmmokalee Area 7-3 EXHIBIT 5 - COLLIER COUNTY 2025 NEEDS MODEL - PSWT VOLUME RANGES Immokalee Rd Radio Rd Davis Bird PSVVT Volume Ranges by Color i'80,000 to 95,000 I'60,000 to 80,000 40,000 to 60,000 ~25,000 to 40,000 12,000 to 25,000 ....... 0 to 12,000 Rattlesn lmmokaleeI Area Immokalee Rd I \ WiispnMii~r 7-4 EXHIBIT 6 - COLLIER COUNTY 2025 NEEDS MODEL - PSWT VOLUMES IN HUNDREDS , ~45 4~2~ 314 ~ 184 167 267 270 ~ 185~ ~16 154 146 1'~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ Immokalee Rd ~ ' ~ ~35 ~ 312 425 ~Z? ~ 329 535 493 4~ ~ ~47 445 Golden Ga~e Pkwy ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 318 33~ ~ 307 ~ _ ~ 2~. ~ = Davis Bird ~ ~ ~ ~ ~81. 31~ ~ 488 ~3 4785!8 ~ 353 ~ 151 ~ R~lesn~e Hamm~k Rd 8 B 356 ~ ~ Immokalee Area % ~% ]co ~, 300 Wiis(inMiller 135 7-5 Table 3: Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 ~ 8 B 2025 Needs Plan Improvements ROADWAY NAME FROM I TO IMPROVEMENT ESTIMATED COST 111th Ave North Vanderbilt Dr to US 41 Two to Four Lanes $ 5,520,000 Airport Rd Irnmokalee Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Four to Six Lanes $ 8,090,000 Airport Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Pine Ridge Rd Four to Six Lanes $ 8,370,000 Alt CR 29 SR 29 North to SR 29 South Two to Four Lanes $ 5,040,000 Bald Eagle Dr SR 951 to CR 92 Two to Four Lanes $ 6,890,000 Collier Blvd Lee County Line to Irnrnokalee Rd. New Four Lane Road $ 15,890,000 Collier Blvd Irnrnokalee Rd to Golden Gate Blvd. Two to Four Lanes $ 12,820,000 Collier Blvd Irnrnokalee Rd to Golden Gate Parkway Four to Six Lanes $ 23,770,000 Collier Blvd Golden Gate Pkwy to Davis Blvd. Four to Six Lanes $ 13,490,000 Collier Blvd 1-75 to Davis Blvd Six to Eight Lanes $ 1,100,000 Collier Blvd Davis Blvd to US 41 E. Four to Six Lanes $ 36,000,000 Collier Bird Marco Island Bddge Two to Four Lanes $ 11,000,000 Collier Blvd. US 41 E. to Marco Island Bddge Four to Six Lanes $ 20,960,000 County Bam Rd Davis Blvd to CR 864 Two to Four Lanes $ 8,900,000 Davis Bird Airport Rd to Santa Barbara Blvd. Four to Six Lanes $ 23,870,000 Davis Blvd East of Santa Barbara Blvd to Radio Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 11,740,000 Davis Blvd Radio Rd to Collier Blvd Two to Six Lanes $ 9,480,000 East-West Collector (Granada Shoppes) US 41 to Goodletta-Frank Rd New Two Lane Road $ 1,760,000 Golden Gate Blvd CR 951 to Wilson Blvd Two to Four Lanes $ 2,750,000 Golden Gate Blvd Wilson Blvd to Everglades Blvd Two to Four Lanes $ 11,400,000 Golden Gate Pkwy Airport Rd to Santa Barbara Blvd. Four to Six Lanes $ 43,770,000 Golden Gate Pkwy Santa Barbara Blvd to Collier Blvd Four to Six Lanes $ 12,610,000 Goodlette-Frank Rd lmrnokalee Rd to Pine Ridge Rd. Two to Four Lanes $ 19,850,000 Goodlette-Frank Rd Imrnokalee Rd to Pine Ridge Rd Four to Six Lanes $ 14,290,000 Goodlette-Frank Rd Pine Ridge Rd to Golden Gate Pkwy Four to Six Lanes $ 13,990,000 Grade Separated Intersections At Three Locations to be Determined Urban Interchanges $ 90,000,000 Green Blvd Santa Badoara Blvd to Sunshine Blvd Two to Four Lanes $ 8,880,000 Green Blvd Ext Livingston Rd. to Whipporwill Lane New Two Lane Road $ 4,750,000 Green Blvd Ext Livingston Rd. to Whipporwill Lane Two to Four Lanes $ 1,120,000 Green Blvd Ext Whipporwill Lane to Santa Barbara Blvd. New Four Lane Road $ 26,610,000 1-75 Lee County Line to Golden Gate Pkwy Four to Six Lanes $ 85,100,000 1-75 Interchange at Golden Gate Parkway New Interchange $ 32,780,000 1-75 SR 951 to Golden Gate Ple, vy Four to Six Lanes $ 11,740,000 1-75 1/75/CR951/SR 84 interchange New Interchange $ 40,000,000 Irnmokalee Loop Rd Lake Trafford Rd to CR 846 New Four Lane Road $ 87,440,000 [rnmokalee Rd US 41 to 1-75 Four to Six Lanes $ 20,470,000 Irnmokalee Rd 1-75 to SR 29 Two to Four Lanes $ 78,520,000 Immokalee Rd 1-75 to Oil Well Rd. Four to Six Lanes $ 18,420,000 Immokalee Rd SR 29 to Irnrnokalee Loop Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 7,150,000 Lake Trafford Rd Imrnokalee Loop Rd to SR 29 Two to Four Lanes $ 3,810,000 Livingston Rd (ENV) Vanderbilt Dr to US 41 New Four Lane Road $ 7,450,000 Livingston Rd (ENV) US 41 to Livingston Rd. N/S New Six Lane Road $ 22,180,000 Livingston Rd (ENV) Livingston Rd (N/S) to Northbrooke Dr New Four Lane Road $ 12,910,000 Livingston Rd (E/W) Northbrooke Dr to Collier Blvd. Ext. New Two Lane Road $ 20,250,000 Livingston Rd (N/S) Imperial St to Livingston Rd (EA, V) New Two Lane Road $ 11,940,000 Livingston Rd (N/S) Livingston Rd (ENV) to Immokalee Rd Two to Six Lanes Included with above Livingston Rd (N/S) Immokalee Rd to Pine Ridge Rd. New Six Lane Road $ 24,750,000 Livingston Rd (N/S) Pine Ridge Rd to Golden Gate Parkway New Six Lane Road $ 10,770,000 Livingston Rd (N/S) Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Rd. New Six Lane Road $ 4,140,000 Logan Blvd Irnmokalee Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd New Four Lane Road $ 13,000,000 Logan Bird Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Pine Ridge Rd. Two to Four Lanes $ 11,230,000 Logan Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Pine Ridge Rd. Four to Six Lanes $ 6,040,000 Logan Blvd Ext Livingston Rd (ENV) to Immokalee Rd New Two Lane Road $ 5,280,000 N Gordon River Bridge Goodlette-Frank Rd to Livingston Rd. New Four Lane Road $ 35,800,000 New N/S Road Radio Rd to Davis BIvd New Six Lane Road $ 15,770,000 Northbrooke Dr Livingston Rd (ENV) to Immokalee Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 5,170,000 Oakes Blvd Imrnokalee Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 7,200,000 Old US 41 US 41 to Lee County Line Two to Four Lanes $ 5,990,000 Orange BIossorn Dr Goodlette-Frank Rd to Airpod Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 6,270,000 Orange Blossom Dr Airport Rd to Livingston Rd New Four Lane Road $ 5,380,000 Pine Ridge Rd Airport Rd to Logan Blvd. Four to Six Lanes $ 300,000 Polly Ave Santa Barabra Blvd Ext to Ra['tlesnake-Hammock Rd New Two Lane Road $ 10,140,000 Radio Rd Airport Rd to Santa Barbara Blvd. Four to Six Lanes $ 9,430,000 Radio Rd Santa Barbara Bird to SR 84 Two to Four Lanes $ 6,580,000 7-6 Table 3: Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 8B 2025 Needs Plan Improvements ROADWAY NAME FROM I TO IMPROVEMENT ESTIMATED COST Radio Rd Santa Barbara Blvd to SR 84 Four to Six Lanes $ 6,240,000 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd St Andrews Blvd to Collier Blvd Two to Four Lanes $ 8,960,000 S Gordon River Bddge Goodlette-Frank Rd to Airport Rd. New Four Lane Road $ 21,750,000 San Marco Road Collier Blvd to North Barfield Dr. Two to Four Lanes $ 9,840,000 Santa Barbara Blvd Pine Ridge Rd. to Gotden Gate Pkwy Four to Six Lanes $ 24,390,000 Santa Barbara Blvd Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Rd. Four to Six Lanes $ 6,240,000: Santa Barbara Blvd Radio Rd to Davis Blvd Four to Six Lanes $ 4,050,000 Santa Barbara Bird EXt SR 84 to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd New Six Lane Road $ 27,350,000 Santa Barbara Bird Ext Rattlesnake Hammock Rd to US 41 Four to Six Lanes $ 16,240,000 SR 29 SR 82 to 1.75 miles west of CR 846 Two to Four Lanes $ 11,600,000 SR 29 Alt CR 29 South to Immokalee Loop Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 6,070,000 SR 82 County Line to SR 29 Two to Four Lanes $ 10,860,000 Tamiami Trail East Barefoot Wins Rd to Collier Bird Four to Six Lanes $ 4,640,000 Tamiami Trail East. Collier Blvd to Greenway Rd. Two to Six Lanes $ 34,110,000 Tamiami Trail East Greenway Rd to San Marco Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 7,010,000 Tamiami Trail North Lee County Line to Livingston Rd (E/VV) Four to Six Lanes $ 6,370,000 Thomasson Dr Bayshora Dr to US 41 Two to Four Lanes $ 7,500,000 Trade Center Way Ext. Airport Rd to Livingston Rd New Two Lane Road $ 6,340,000 Vanderbilt Beach Rd US 41 to Airport Rd. Four to Six Lanes $ 8,900,000 Vanderbilt Beach Rd Airport Rd to Logan Blvd. Two to Six Lanes $ 22,700,000 Vanderbilt Beach Rd Logan Bird to Collier Btvd Two to Four Lanes Included with above Vanderbilt Beach Rd Logan Blvd to Collier Bird Four to Six Lanes $ 5,110,000 Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext. Collier Bird to Wilson Blvd New Four Lanes $ 35,260,000 Vanderbilt Dr Bonita Beach Rd to Wiggins Pass Rd. Two to Four Lanes ! $ 12,540,000 Vanderbilt Dr Wiggins Pass Rd to 111th Ave N Two to Four Lanes I $ 9,040,000 Whipporwill Lane Pine Ridge Rd. to Green Blvd. Ext New Two Lane Road $ 4,670,000 Whittaker Ave, County Barn Rd to Santa Barbara BIvd Ext Two to Four Lanes $ 2,680,000 Whittaker Ave, Ext. Santa Barbara Blvd Ext to CR 951 New Four Lane Road $ 20,510,000 Wilson Blvd Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 6,560,000 Needs Plan Total $ 1,465,650,000 7-7 '~',.--,hCollier County Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 8 B 8- FINANCIAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT Following the development of the Needs Plan, the MPO prepared a financially constrained or "Financially Feasible Plan." The Financially Feasible Plan was based on a LRTP Financial Plan consisting of two components: * Costs of various improvements * Revenues from various local and state funding sources Local and state/federal revenue estimates were developed in a manner consistent with FDOT accepted methodologies that reflect sources and levels that can reasonably be expected during the planning periods (horizon years). Revenue estimates were prepared for each of the planning periods/horizons. The list below summarizes the estimates of state, federal, and local revenues expected to be available for capital construction from fiscal year (FY) 2001 through FY 2025. These financial estimates were predicated on the reauthorization of the $.05 local option gas tax in December 2003 and the continuation of County Commission policy to use a portion of the local option gas tax for road and bridge maintenance. In the event that additional revenues are made available for capital construction, these estimates subsequently would be revised. Revenues for Capital Construction FY 2001 - FY 2025 (1998 dollars) State/Federal Revenues: $265,000,000~ Local Revenues: $428,907,0002 Total Financial Resources: $693,907,000 I Source: Florida Department of Transportation, December 1999 2 Source: Collier County, November 2000 The cost of making needed improvements were developed using the best available data and information for each project, derived from a variety of sources, including Collier County and state transportation programming and cost estimating documents. Each project cost estimate includes funds for all applicable phases of a project. Estimates usually incorporate preliminary engineering and design, right-of-way acquisition, construction, and construction engineering and inspection costs. The list below summarizes the costs for the 2025 Needs Plan and the 2025 Financially Feasible Plan. Capital Construction Cost Estimates FY 2001 - FY 2025 (1998 dollars) 2025 Needs Plan: $1,465,650,0001 2025 Financially Feasible Plan: $690,720,000~ 2025 Unfunded Needs: $774,930,000 1 Source: Tindale-Oliver, December 2000 The financial plan, prepared for this study by Tindale-Oliver, Inc. is included in its entirety in this section. Section 8, Page 1 Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26 2001 FINANCIAL PLAN 8B Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to compare the estimated costs of the Transportation Plan with the revenues and resources available for its implementation. This comparison has been undertaken on a program-by-program basis paralleling the components of the Transportation Plan. Phase One (2000-2005) costs and revenues are addressed in the currently adopted construction programs of the Florida Department of Transportation and Collier County. Table 1 compares the estimated costs and revenues for the Transportation Plan, and serves as the basis for the discussion below. The table summarizes the costs and revenues for the Transportation Plan from 2001 to 2025. Administrative maintenance, operational, and retrofit/upgrade funds have been addressed and budgeted, as discussed in Revenue Projections. The table indicates that the total costs of the Financially-Feasible Plan balance the anticipated available revenues to within 0.5 percent, however significantly more road improvements _are planned on the County road system than on the State road system. Therefore, the financial plan requires that a substantial proportion of the federal-aid surface transportation program funds be directed to fund County roads. Table 1 2001 to 2025 Cost and Revenue Summary (in $1,000's) Pro~lram Estimated Revenues Estimated Costs Difference State FIHS Roads ~ $147,882 $157,880 -$9,998 Other State Roads ~ $117,112 $32,230 $84,882 County Roads $428,907 $500,600 -$71,693 Public Transportation ~ $38,672 $38,672 $0 Totals: $732,573 $729,382 $ 3,191 Note: (1) Funds are for right-of-way acquisition and construction only. Funds for P.D.&E., design and other support services on the State Road System are not included in these funds. (2) County matching funds only. Prepared by: Tindale-Oliver and Associates, Inc. March 28, 2001 8-2 COLLIER COUNTY MPO 2025 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN REVENUE PROJECTIONS Prepared for: Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by: Tindale-Oliver and Associates, Inc. March 28, 2001 21502,00 8-3 REVENUE PROJECTIONS 8B Introduction To enable the Collier County MPO to address funding of capital needs, an estimate of the revenues that will be generated by current revenue sources from 2006 to 2025 was prepared. This estimate involved a review of revenues generated by current revenue sources for transportation services and a projection of these revenues into the future. Federal, State, and County revenue sources were considered. By act of the Florida State Legislature, municipal roads are defined as local and urban collector roads and are not included in the major road network considered in this planning study. Municipal revenues are primarily allocated to the maintenance and operation of these streets, and thus, were not considered to be available to implement the major road network plan. The revenue estimates were divided into two major categories: revenues allocated for capital improvements and revenues allocated for administration, maintenance, and operating expenditures. The results of this review are provided in this chapter. Revenues were estimated for the years 2006 through 2025, as revenues for the years 2000 through 2005 are represented in the currently adopted County Capital Improvement Program and the Florida DOT's Five-Year Work Program. I State and Federal Revenues For state facilities within Collier County, the primary revenue sources are federal and state fuel taxes. The federal fuel tax is equivalent to $0.14 per gallon of gasoline and the state fuel tax, which is comprised of a fuel sales tax and a "comprehensive enhanced transportation tax," is equivalent to $0.12 per gallon of gasoline. The federal sources are exclusively used for capital improvements, maintenance of the Interstate Highway System, and operating expenses for transit-related services. The revenues from these sources are distributed through the Florida DOT and have traditionally been used only for improvements to state facilities within Collier County. In recent years, flexibility has been increased, allowing the application of portions of federal revenue traditionally used exclusively for the state road system to non-state roads. Thus, the state revenue projections are divided into the following categories: · Interstate Highway System Funds; · Other Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) Funds; · Transit Capital Funds; · Transit Maintenance and Operating Funds; · Intermodal Facility Access Funds; and · Other Federal-Aid Highway System (FAHS) Funds. It is the "Other Federal-Aid Highway System" funds that provide the cross-jurisdictional and cross-system funding flexibility. The Florida DOT staff has prepared revenue estimates for the above categories for Collier County. These estimates are referenced in a document entitled "Revenue Forecast Handbook, 2020 Revenue Forecast Update, Forecast of State Transportation Revenues and Proqram Levels" dated December, 1999, This document provides projections of revenues for the 2006 to 2020 time period. This report does not clearly indicate funding levels for the FIHS program July 9, 2OOl J:1215021DocstRevPro/.doc Collier County 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan 8-4 Revenue Projections area. However, it indicates that improvements to 1-75 from Golden Gate Parkway to the Lee County Line and that right-of-way for an improvement to the 1-75/Collier Parkway (CR 951) interchange are funded between 2010 and 2020. From 2006 through 2020, $70.3 million has been estimated to be available for other federal-aid system capacity improvements. These revenues can be used for the acquisition of right-of-way or construction of roads, or even implementation of transit systems. Additional funding to address necessary planning studies, preliminary engineering and design, construction observation, and maintenance and operation expenses have been set aside by the Florida DOT and are not included in the above amounts. $9.3 million has been estimated available to improve access to facilities that provide for transfers between modes of transportation. Intermodal facilities include facilities such as bus stops, parking garages, airports, or ports. Improvements to facilities or programs providing improved access to intermodal transfer facilities are eligible for these funds. Another $5.7 million has been estimated for transportation system enhancement activities such as landscaping, preserving historic aspects of the system, or other qualified activities. Finally, $25.1 million has been earmarked specifically for public transportation needs. Federal regulations have provided for considerable flexibility regarding the application of some of these funds. The funds are "upwardly flexible", meaning that the MPO may choose to allocate "Other FAHS" funds "upwardly" to the Interstate or "Other FIHS" road systems, or further increase public transportation programs, including "off-system" roadways that are determined to benefit the state highway system. Similarly, the "Other FIHS" funds may be applied "upwardly" to Interstate Highway system improvements. 2 County Revenues Revenue sources at the county level for transportation involve several state and local funding sources. These sources include the following: Constitutional Gas Tax County Gas Tax · "Ninth Cent" Gas Tax · Local Option Gas Tax · Transportation Impact Fees · Ad Valorem Tax/General Fund Based Funding · Other Local Taxes and Fees Projections for these revenue sources through 2025 were provided by Collier County staff, and their applicability to capital needs are discussed in the following sections. 2.1 Constitutional Gas Tax The Constitutional Gas Tax of $0.02 per gallon tax on "gasoline and other like products of petroleum" was proposed in 1941 as an amendment to the Florida Constitution by the Florida Legislature and passed in 1943. This tax was originally called the "Second Gas Tax" and was intended to cover the costs of state road construction. The Governor, State Treasurer, and State Comptroller formed the State Board of Administration to manage, control and supervise the revenues from this tax. Presently, this tax is called the "Constitutional Gas Tax" and is July 9, 2001 J: ~21502~Docs~RevProj, doc Collier County 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan 8-5 Revenue Projections 8B intended to be a state-shared revenue source for counties only. The State Board of Administration still governs the revenues. This tax covers a portion of transportation-related debt service managed by the State Board of Administration for all counties. After covering the debt service, any surplus funds are distributed to the Board of County Commissioners. All counties are eligible for this revenue. The distribution factor for each county is calculated as follows: 1 County Area + I_ County Population + I Motor Fuel Gallons Sold in Ct¥ = 4 State Area 4 State Population 2 * Motor Fuel Gallons Sold Statewide County's Distribution Factor The monthly allocation for each county is calculated as follows: Monthly Statewide Constitutional * County's Distribution = County's Monthly Gas Tax Receipts Factor Allocation The distribution of the monthly allocation for each county is calculated as follows: Monthly Allocation * 80 percent = Allocated First to Meet Debt Service Requirement, then Remainder Transferred to County Monthly Allocation * 20 percent = Amount transferred directly to County The Constitutional Gas Tax transferred to the counties must be used for construction and maintenance of roads. Maintenance refers to periodic and routine maintenance, and may include the construction and installation of traffic signals, sidewalks, bicycle paths, and landscaping, as necessary for the safe and efficient operation of roads. The Constitutional Gas Tax yielded $2.586 million in 2000. All of the Constitutional Gas 'Fax revenue returned to Collier County is allocated to capital improvements. 2.2 County Gas Tax The County Gas Tax is $0.01 per gallon on motor fuel, imposed at the wholesale level. Enacted in 1941, the tax was originally called the "Seventh Cent Tax" and was intended to reduce a county's reliance on ad valorem taxes. Presently, this tax is called the "County Tax on Motor Fuel" and is still intended to reduce a county's reliance on ad valorem taxes. The State Department of Revenue administers the tax and distributes the net tax proceeds to the counties on a monthly basis, using the same distribution method used to distribute the Constitutional Gas Tax proceeds. In Collier County, this tax yielded $1.405 million in 2000. This tax may be used by the counties for transportation related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. All counties are eligible to receive this revenue. This tax is also allocated by Collier County to roadway capital improvements. 2.3 "Ninth Cent" Gasoline Tax The "Ninth Cent" gasoline tax is a local option gasoline tax authorized by the Florida legislature in 1972, and approved by local voters in March, 1980. For these revenue projections, this revenue source is assumed to continue indefinitely. It is allocated to maintenance and operations. Collier County 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan Revenue Projections July 9, 2001 J:12150210ocslRevProj. doc 8-6 2.4 First Local Option Gas Tax As a result of legislation enacted in 1983, local governments are authorized to levy the "original" Local Option Gas Tax (LOGT) through Board of County Commissioner action or local referendum. In 1999, Collier County reenacted a $0.06 tax on every gallon of motor and special fuel sold at retail in the County. This authorization extends for 16 years, through 2015, and is assumed to be renewed indefinitely. By inter-local agreement, the municipalities receive 19.01 percent of the proceeds of this tax, and the County 80.09 percent for the next five years. This tax generated $3.146 million in 2000 for Collier County. The proceeds are available to fund transportation expenditures such as the following: · Public transportation operations and maintenance; · Roadway and right-of-way maintenance and equipment and structures used primarily for the storage and maintenance of such equipment; · Paving roads; · Roadway and right-of-way drainage; · Street lighting; · Sidewalks; · Traffic signs, traffic engineering, signalization, and pavement markings; · Bridge maintenance and operation; and · Debt service and current expenditures for transportation capital projects in the foregoing program areas, including construction or reconstruction of roads. Collier County has traditionally used these revenues for roadway capital improvements; however, it has been reallocating these revenues to fund roadway maintenance in a progressive manner. 2.5 Second Local Option Gas Tax As a result of legislation enacted in 1993, local governments are authorized to levy a "second" Local Option Gas Tax (LOGT) of up to five cents per gallon of fuel. Collier County enacted the full $0.05 tax on every gallon of motor and special fuel sold at retail in the County. This authorization extends through December 31,2003. In March, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners confirmed their intent to extend this tax for an additional 20 years. By interlocal agreement, the municipalities receive 15.33 percent of the proceeds of this tax, and the County 84.77 percent. This tax provided $4.050 million to Collier County in 2000. The County uses the proceeds for roadway capital improvements 2.6 Transportation Impact Fees Collier County has adopted a transportation impact fee as a revenue source for improvements that increase the capacity of the transportation system. This includes construction of sidewalks and bicycle facilities as a part of roadway capacity expansion projects. Impact fees are assessed on new development and annual revenues are dictated by the rate of growth. They have historically generated about 14 percent of the County's transportation revenues. In January, 2000, Collier County increased its impact fee schedule rates by approximately 50 to 75 percent, and correspondingly increased revenues are expected. For this estimate, impact fee income of $12.404 million per year through 2010 was assumed, up from $8 million to $10 million per year over the last three years. From 2010 through 2025, impact fee income of $7.5 Col/ier County 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan Revenue Projections July 9, 2001 J:121502tDocslRevPro/.doc 8-7 8B 1,a million per year in constant 2010 dollars, was assumed as a conservative projection of available revenues. 2. 7 Public Transportation Revenues In February, 2001, Collier County will begin a fixed-route public transportation system. This system will be primarily funded by State and Federal grants through 2005. After 2005, according to the "Collier County Public Transportation Development Plan, FY 2000 - FY 2004" (Center for Urban Transportation Research, June, 1999), $14,608 per year will be needed in addition to approximately $110,000 per year currently being funded for Immokalee area public transportation. The source of this funding has not been determined yet. 2.8 Ad Valorem Tax/General Fund Based Funds General Fund transfers and property-value based assessments have historically been used to fund roadway maintenance. These revenues have made up 29 percent of the County's transportation revenues. These revenue sources will likely continue to fund maintenance in the future, but at a decreasing level. As the first local option gasoline tax is being allocated from capital into maintenance, the amount of general fund transfers has been reduced correspondingly. The tax roll has increased historically at a rate of 4.81 percent. This revenue source was not relied upon for capacity-increasing improvements. 2.9 Other Income Other funding sources, such as interest earned on fund balances, miscellaneous license fees, private contributions, and other miscellaneous funds have accounted for 15 percent of the County's transportation revenues in recent years. The largest single source of funds in this category is interest earnings on accumulated fund balances. With an accelerated road construction program, significant interest earnings are not expected in the future. Thus, these revenues were not relied upon for capacity-increasing improvements. 3 County Revenue Projections To project county revenues into the future, the following assumptions were made: · Countywide fuel sales (and thus, revenue per penny of tax) would grow at an annual rate of 3.0% per year through 2010, and stay constant thereafter; · Based on information provided by the Florida DOT, road improvement costs will grow by 3.3% per year; · Allocation of road systems funds by program area remains similar to the current program, with the exception of reallocation of the first local option gasoline tax to maintenance; Based on these assumptions, the projections of revenue available for capital needs, by funding source, are provided in Table 1. $126.9 million in 1998 dollars are estimated to be available for major roadway construction from 2001 to 2005, and an additional $293.4 million from 2006 through 2025 from existing County revenue sources. Significant carry-forward funds from prior July 9, 2001 J:1215021Docs I Re vProj, do c Collier County 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan 8-8 Revenue Projections years and grants from the Florida DOT create the higher proportion fund availability during the first five years of the planning period. 4 Combined Transportation Budget Table 2 summarizes revenues expected to be available for transportation services and facility expansion from 2006 to 2020 and from 2021 to 2025 from federal, state and county sources in accordance with the anticipated plan staging. These revenue projections, and allocation of funds by program area, served as the basis for evaluating the affordability of the transportation plan. 5 Potential Additional Revenue Sources Indications of the transportation planning analysis are that additional revenues will be required to finance the programs and facilities to serve future needs within the established levels of performance. This section considers the revenues that would be generated by additional motor fuel taxes, ad valorem taxes, and sales taxes. One penny per gallon of motor fuel taxes generated approximately $0.878 million per year in - 2000. Transportation costs are expected to grow at a rate of 3.3 percent per year. Each penny of motor fuel tax is, therefore, expected to generate $13.4 million (1998 dollars) over the 2006 to 2025 period. Changes to State legislation would be required to allow the assessment of additional motor fuel taxes, as the County currently levies the maximum allowable tax. One mill of ad valorem (property) tax generated $21.36 million per year in 1998. The value of Collier County's tax base has historically increased at a rate of 4.8 percent per year, and this trend was assumed with the estimated inflation of transportation costs of 3.3 percent per year, to estimate potential revenues. The yield of one mill of ad valorem assessment between 2006 and 2025 is estimated to be $267 million, in 1998 dollars. Sales tax revenues are also sometimes used to finance transportation. In 1998, a one percent sales tax rate generated $48.4 million in Collier County. Using a 4.5% per year countywide population growth rate and the 3.3% per year transportation cost inflation rate used above, commitment of one percent of the sales tax would generate an estimated $605 million between 2006 and 2025, in 1998 dollars. July 9, 2001 J:121502~Docs~RevProj. doc Collier County 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan 8-9 Revenue Projections Table 2 Summary of Estimated Revenues for Facility and Service Expansion ($1,000's, 1998 Dollars) Program Area I 2001- 2006- 2011 - 2016- 2021 - Total I 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025® Road Capacity Interstate $32,782 $85,100 $ 0 $0 $ 0 $117,882 Other FIHS~) $ 0 $ 0 $30,000 $ 0 $ 0 $30,000 Other FAHS~z'~ $11,012 $ 26,400 $ 26,500 $26,700 $ 26,500 $117,112 County Roads $135,480 $ 85,060 $ 66,391 $ 69,617 $ 72,359 $428,907 Roads Subtotals: $179,274 $196,560 $122,891 $ 96,317 $98,859 $693,901 Public Transportation State/Federal $2,415 $ 8,200 $ 8,400 $ 8,500 $ 8,367 $35,882 County $540 $ 575 $ 575 $ 575 $ 575 $ 2,790 Public Transportation $ 2,955 $ 8,775 $ 8,975 $ 9,075 $ 8,942 $ 38,672 Subtotals: TOTALS: $182,229 $205,335 $131,866 $105,392 $107,801 $732,573 Notes: 1. "Other FAHS" funding in this column ~s estimated as 33.3 percent of 2006 - 2020 revenue estimates. 2. Funds are for right-of-way acquisition and construction only. Funds for P, D, & E, design, and other support services on State roads are not included in these funds. 3. Includes Intermodal Facility Access funds of $9.3 million from 2006 to 2020, but excludes $5.7 million of Enhancement funds. July 9, 2001 J.'~215021DocslRevProj. doc Collier County 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan 8-11 Revenue Projections .8B 0 0 0 0 t~ 0 0 July 9, 2001 J:i2150210ocslRevProj. doc Coflier County 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan 8-10 Revenue Projections "%\Collier Court_fy Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 9- 2025 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE PLAN DEVELOPMENT The MPC has developed the Financially Feasible Plan based on the 2025 Needs Plan and the Financial Plan previously discussed. The recommended 2025 Financially Feasible Plan Map (see Exhibits 7-9) demonstrates the consistency of the proposed transportation investments with current and reasonably anticipated revenue sources as documented in the Financial Plan. In developing the Financially Feasible Plan, eleven alternative network scenarios were developed and tested by trimming the 2025 Needs Plan Network of new or expanded links (beyond those improvements included in the existing plus committed network). Based on computer modeling analyses, these links were identified as least beneficial regarding system performance (measured in terms of congestion). LOS analysis was performed on each scenario, as appropriate, using the FDOT Generalized LOS Maximum Service Volume Tables, converted to PSWDT volumes. As in the case of the Needs Plan development process, the use of LOS "D" as the acceptable LOS standard for comparison was assumed. Many issues were considered in analyzing various alternatives: the advantages and disadvantages of improving facilities within existing corridors as well as the often competing factors associated with developing new corridors. Improvements within existing corridors may or may not require additional right-of- way. Additionally, they may create varying degrees of disruption to both adjacent land owners/businesses and motorists. Conversely, opening new corridors may cause less disruption to motorists, but may be more costly and damaging to landowners. The following additional Coif/er County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 positive and negative evaluation criteria were considered: * Addresses existing and projected operating level of service · Increases linkages/interconnections to major roads/reduces circuitous travel patterns * Improves intercounty and interregional connections/facilities to support efficient movement of people, goods and services * Improves hurricane evacuation routes · Addresses interconnecting hurricane evacuation routes with adjacent urban and non-urban areas · Improves access to intermodal transfer points such as airports * Enhances existing or proposed freight movement corridors · Improves access to major travel destinations, activity centers, and public facilities inside and outside the county · Addresses bicycle and pedestrian needs o Promotes joint public/private participation · Has a disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effect on minority or Iow income populations * Potential adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive lands and waters · Potential impacts to existing local streets * Potential displacement of existing residences * Potential impacts to public facilities such as schools, parks, and recreational facilities o Potential negative impacts to existing businesses o Potential adverse noise impacts to adjacent residences and impacts to air quality · Potential adverse impacts to cultural, Section 9, Page 1 ,8B 'j ~-~..~Co,,~ cou~y Long IVange Transportation Plan Update 2025 historical, and architectural landmarks and features * Potential division or separation of existing neighborhoods or communities Each potential improvement was evaluated against the listed criteria. The results of the evaluation were used to help identify the most beneficial improvements to be included in the Financially Feasible Plan included in the appendices. Considering the available revenues and the applicable evaluation criteria, the projects shown in Table 4, the 2025 Financially Feasible Plan are the recommended improvements for the MPO 2025 LRTP Update. The additional projects shown in Table 5, the 2025 Unfunded Needs, are recommended alternate candidates that should be considered in the event that additional financial resources are made available to support the MPO 2025 LRTP. Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2025 L RTP Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 Section 9, Page 2 EXHIBIT 7 - COLLIER COUNTY 2025 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - NUMBER OF Imrnokaiee Rd Radio Rd Davis Bird Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Number of Directional Lanes by Color 2 3 ~4 Corridor Study ~.~/ Immokalee Area i WilspnMiller ........... 9-3 EXHIBIT 8 - COLLIER COUNTY 2025 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - PSWT VOLUME RANGES Immokatee Rd ~ Radio Rd Davis B/vd PSWT Volume Ranges by Color ~ 80,000 to 95,000 ~ 60,000 to 80,000 ~ 40,000 to 60,000 ~25,000 to 40,000 12,000 to 25,000 0 to 12,000 ~% ~ ,' Immokalee Area Wilspl~iiler 9-4 EXHIBIT 9 - COLLIER COUNTY 2025 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - PSWT VOLUMES IN HUNDREDS ~ ~ ~ ;~ , ~: Immokalee Rd 477 ~ A~ 664 _684 V3~2 ?~1 :690 707~.. 573 ~ ~32 291 Golden G~ Pk~ 711 ~6 ~ 51~506 471 471 ~6; 39? 373 ~ ~27~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ R~lesnakeHammockRd 367 % % % 455 45~ 3._00,~d3 3qo :~ - WilsOnMIIler 181 9-5 88 Table 4: 2025 Financially Feasible Plan 2025 FINA NCIA LLY ROA DWA Y NA ME FROM / TO IMPROV BVE~IT FEASIBLE PLA I~ ESTIMA TI~) COST Airport Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Pine Ridge Rd Four to Six Lanes $ 8,370,000 Collier Blvd Lee County Line to Irrrnokalee Rd. New Four Lane Road $ 15,890,000 Collier Bird ;~kalee Rd to Golden Gate Blvd. Two to Four Lanes $ ?--12 820'~00~ Collier Blvd Golden Gate Pkw y to Davis Blvd. Four to Six Lanes $ 13,4-§0,000 Collier Blvd Marco Island Bridge Two to Four Lanes $ 11,000,000 County Barn Rd Davis Blvd to CR 864 Two to Four Lanes $ 8,900,000 Davis Blvd East of Santa Barbara Blvd to Radio Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 11,740,000 Davis Btvd Radio Rd to Collier Blvd Two to Six Lanes $ 9,480,000 East-West Collector (Granada Shoppes) US 41 to Goodlette-Frank Rd New Two Lane Road $ 1,760,00© :Golden Gate Blvd CR 951 to Wilson BIvd Two to Four Lanes $ 2,750,000 Golden Gate Pkw y Airport Rd to Santa Barbara Blvd. Four to Six Lanes $ 43,770,000 Goodlette-Frank Rd Irrrr~kalee Rd toRne Ridge Rd. Two to Four Lanes $ 19,650,000 Goodlette-Frank Rd Pine Ridge Rd to Golden Gate Pkwy Four to Six Lanes $ 13,990,000 Green Blvd Ext Livingston Rd. to Whipporw ill Lane New Two Lane Road $ 4,750,000 1-75 Golden Gate Pkwy to Lee County line Four to Six Lanes $ 85,100,000 1-75 Interchange at Golden Gate Parkw ay New Interchange $ 32,780,000 1-75 1/75/CR951/SR 84 interchange New Interchange $ 40,000,000 ;r,-,~Jkalee Rd US 41 to 1-75 Four to Six Lanes $ 20,470,000 iiYf~ukalee Rd 1-75 toSR 29 Two to Four Lanes $ 78,520,000 Livingston Rd (F_/VV) US 41 to Livingston Rd. N/S New Six Lane Road $ 22,180,000 Livingston Rd (N/S) Imperial St to Livingston Rd (~) New Four Lane Road $ 11,940,000 Livingston Rd (N/S) Livingston Rd (E/VV) to Irnmokalee Rd New Six Lane Road Included with above Livingston Rd (N/S) Irnmokalee Rd to Pine Ridge Rd. New Six Lane Road $ 24,750,000 Livingston Rd (N/S) Pine Ridge Rd to Golden Gate Parkway New Six Lane Road $ 10,770,000 Livingston Rd (N/S) Golden Gate Pkw y to Radio Rd. New Six Lane Road $ 4,140,000 Logan Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Pine Ridge Rd. Two to Four Lanes $ 11,230,000 Logan Blvd Irnmokalee Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd New Four Lane Road $ 13,000,000 Oakes Blvd .~,]~)kalee Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 7,200,000 Pine Ridge Rd Airport Rd to Logan Blvd. Four to Six Lanes $ 300,000 Radio Rd Airport Rd to Santa Barbara Blvd. Four to Six Lanes $ 9,430,000 Radio Rd Santa Barbara Blvd to SR 84 Two to Four Lanes $ 6,580,000 Santa Barbara BIvd Pine Ridge Rd. to Golden Gate Pkw y Four to Six Lanes $ 24,390,000 ~ Santa Barbara BIvd Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Rd. Four to Six Lanes $ 6,240,000 Santa Barbara Blvd Radio Rd to Davis BIvd Four to Six Lanes $ 4,050,000 Tamiami Trail East Barefoot Wrns Rd to Collier Blvd Four to Six Lanes $ 4,640,000 Tarniami Trail North Lee County Line to Livingston Rd (E/VV) Four to Six Lanes $ 6,370,000 Trade Center Way Ext. Airport Rd to Livingston Rd Now Two Lane Road $ 6,340,000 Vanderbiit Beach Rd Airport Rd toLogan Blvd. Two to Six Lanes $ 22,700,000 Vanderbilt Beach Rd Logan Blvd to Collier Blvd Two to Four Lanes Included with above Vanderbilt Beach Rd Ext. Collier Bivd to Wilson Blvd New Four Lanes $ 35,260,000 Vanderbilt Dr Bonita Beach Rd toWiggins Pass Rd. Two to Four Lanes $ 12,540,000 Whipporw ill Lane Pine Ridge Rd. to Green Blvd. Ext New Two Lane Road $ 4,669,999 Wilson Blvd Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 6,560,000 Total $ 690,720,000 2025 Financially Feasible Plan - The table above identifies those improvements that are likely to be funded under the current revenue projections. The accompanying table identifies those projects for which funding was not available. In the event that additional revenues are made available, the Financially Feasible can be quickly updated to include additional projects from the "unfunded" Needs Plan list. 9-6 Table 5:2025 Unfunded Needs COST OF ROADWAY NA ME FROM / TO NF'F~ED IMPROV BVIENT UNFUNDED NEEDS 111th Ave North Vanderbilt Dr to US 41 Two to Four Lanes $ 5,520,000 Airport Rd Imn'~kalee Rd to Vanderbilt Beach Rd Four to Six Lanes $ 8,090,000 Alt CR 29 SR 29 North to SR 29 South Two to Four Lanes $ 5,040,000 Bald Eagle Dr SR 951 to CR 92 Two to Four Lanes $ 6,890,000 Collier Blvd Ir'rrr~kalee Rd to Golden Gate Parkw ay Four to Six Lanes $ 23,770,000 Collier Blvd 1-75 to Davis Blvd Six to Eight Lanes $ 1,100,000 Collier BIvd Davis BIvd to US 41 E. Four to Six Lanes $ 36,000,000 Collier Blvd. US 41 E to Marco Island Bridge Four to Six Lanes $ 20,960,000 Whittaker Ave. County Barn Rd to Santa Barbara Bird F..xt Two to Four Lanes $ 2,680,000 Whittaker Ave. Ext. Santa Barbara Blvd Ext to CR 951 New Four Lane Road $ 20,510,000 Davis Blvd Airport Rd to Santa Barbara Blvd. Four to Six Lanes $ 23,870,000 Golden Gate BIvd Wilson BIvd to Everglades Blvd Two to Four Lanes $ 11,400,000 Golden Gate Pkw y Santa Barbara Bird to Collier Blvd Four to Six Lanes $ 12,610,000 Goodlette-Frank Rd Irrf'r~kalee Rd to Pine Ridge Rd Four to Six Lanes $ 14,290,000 Green Blvd Santa Barbara BIvd to Sunshine Blvd Two to Four Lanes $ 8,880,000 Green BIvd Ext Whipporw ill Lane to Santa Barbara Blvd. New Four Lane Road $ 26,610,000 Green Blvd EXt Livingston Rd. to Whipporwill Lane Two to Four Lanes $ 1,120,000 1-75 SR 951 to Golden Gate Pkw y Four to Six Lanes $ 11,740,000 Immokalee Loop Rd Lake Trafford Rd to CR 846 New Four Lane Road $ 87,440,000 frrrnokalee Rd 1-75 to Oil Well Rd. Four to Six Lanes $ 18,420,000 Irnmokalee Rd SR 29 to Irrrnokalee Loop Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 7,150,000 Lake Trafford Rd Imrnokalee Loop Rd to SR 29 Two to Four Lanes $ 3,810,000 Livingston Rd (F_NV) Vanderbilt Dr to US 41 New Four Lane Road $ 7,450,000 Livingston Rd (E/W) Livingston Rd (N/S) to Northbrooke Dr New Four Lane Road $ 12,910,000 Livingston Rd (ENV) Northbrooke Dr to Collier Blvd. EXt. New Two Lane Road $ 20,250,000 New N/S Roadway Radio Rd to Davis Blvd New Six Lane Road $ 15,770,000 Logan Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Rd to Pine Ridge Rd. Four to Six Lanes $ 6,040,000 Logan BIvd EXt Livingston Rd (ENV) to Irrrnokalee Rd New Two Lane Road $ 5,280,000 N Gordon River Bridge Goodlette-Frank Rd to Livingston Rd. New Four Lane Road $ 35,800,000 Northbrooke Dr Livingston Rd (E/W) to Imm3kalee Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 5,170,000 Old US 41 US 41 to Lee county Line Two to Four Lanes $ 5,990,000 Orange Blossom Dr Goodlette-Frank Rd to Airport Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 6,270,000 Orange Blossom Dr Airport Rd to Livingston Rd New Four Lane Road $ 5,380,000 Pally Ave Santa Barabra BIvd Ext to Rattlesnake-Hamr'r~ck Rd New Two Lane Road $ 10,140,000 Radio Rd Santa Barbara Blvd to SR 84 Four to Six Lanes $ 6,240,000 Rattlesnake HarrcrDck Rd St Andrew s BIvd to Collier Bird Two to Four Lanes $ 8,960,000 S Gordon River Bridge Goodlette-Frank Rd to Airport Rd. New Four Lane Road $ 21,750,000 San Marco Road collier Blvd to North Barfield Dr. Two to Four Lanes $ 9,840,000 Santa Barbara Blvd Ext Rattlesnake Hammock Rd to US 41 Four to Six Lanes $ 16,240,000 Santa Barbara Blvd Ext SR 84 to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd New Six Lane Road $ 27,350,000 SR29 SR 82 to [75 miles w est of CR 846 Two to Four Lanes $ 11,600,000 SR29 Alt CR 29 South to In'Trokalee Loop Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 6,070,000 SR82 County Line to SR 29 Two to Four Lanes $ 10,860,000 Tamiarri Trail East Collier Bird to Greenw ay Rd. Two to Six Lanes $ 34,110,000 Tamiami Trail East Greenw ay Rd to San Marco Rd Two to Four Lanes $ 7,010,000 Thomasson Dr Bayshore Dr to US 41 Two to Four Lanes $ 7,500,000 Vanderbilt Beach Rd US 41 to Airport Rd. Four to Six Lanes $ 8,900,000 Vanderbilt Beach Rd Logan Blvd to Collier Btvd Four to Six Lanes $ 5,110,000 Vanderbilt Dr Wiggins Pass Rd to 111th Ave N Two to Four Lanes $ 9,040,000 Grade Separated Intersections Three Locations ,Grade Separated Intersections $ 90,000,000 Total $ 774,930,000 2025 Unfunded Needs List - The table above identifies those projects for which funding was not available. In the event that additional revenues are made available, the Financially Feasible Plan can be quickly updated to include additional projects from the "unfunded" Needs Plan list. 9-7 '~',,.-hE:ollier County Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 10- INTERIM YEAR PLANS Three additional "interim year" financially constrained plans were developed as part of the 2025 Financially Feasible Plan development process. Using the 2025 Financially Feasible Plan as a starting point and applying financial forecasts revealed funding thresholds that would require the scaling back of the 2025 plan. Using previously developed work program priorities, the three additional interim year plans were prepared and modeled using interim year land use data sets the MPO provided. Population, housing, and employment control totals for the interim years used in the modeling process are shown in Table 6. Table 7 depicts the entire list of the 2025 Financially Feasible Plan projects, divided into planning timeframes to yield the 2005, 2010, 2020 and 2025 plans. The three additional interim year networks are shown on the accompanying pages as Figures 10 - 18. The interim year plans are intended to be used as general guidelines. Projects may be advanced or deferred as deemed appropriate by changing priorities or funding capabilities. Table 6 Land Use Variable 2005 2010 2020 2025 Single Family Dwelling Units 78,733 89,235 111,929 124,382* Single Family Population 178,808 205,686 263,670 295,410' Multi-Family Dwelling Units 94,579 102,066 118,249 127,262' Multi-Family Population 109,192 120,314 144,330 157,590* Total Population 288,000 326,000 408,000 453,000 Industrial Employment 27,596 34,013 47,480 55,095 Commercial Employment 40,095 44,770 54,972 60,124 Service Employment 73,429 80,957 97,468 105,683 Total Employment 141,120 159,740 199,920 220,902 SourCe:Collies' County Melropolitan Planning Organization Ocl. 2000 · Components of total population pra~ou~y published v,~,ra rewsecl due to a correction o! resiclenlial zonal contents on Marco island. Sect/on 10, Page 1 Collier County Metropoh'tan Planning Organization 2025 LRTP Update--Final Report Adopted January26, 2001 tntenm Year P/ans. Page 1 8B I:~ EXHIBIT 10 - COLLIER COUNTY 2020 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - NUMBER OF LANES Immokalee Rd Radio Rd Davis Blvd Ratt esnake Hammock Rd Number of Directional Lanes by Color 2 3 4 Corridor Study "~ Imm°kalee Area e~m~l Immokalee Rd WilspnMiller 10 - 3 EXHIBIT 11 - COLLIER COUNTY 2020 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - PSWT VOLUME RANGES Immokalee Rd -~ Radio Rd Davis Blvd PSWT Volume Ranges by Color ~ 80,000 to 85,000 ~ 60,000 to 80,000 ~,40,000 to 60,000 ,25,000 to 40,000 12,000 to 25,000 .......... 0 to 12,000 ~ Im~°kal~ee Area ,, ImmokaleeR. T ",% ~ 10-4 EXHIBIT 12 - COLLIER COUNTY 2020 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - PSWT VOLUMES IN HUNDREDS ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ' Immokalee Rd 578 753 92 92 ~ 14~ 1~ ~ 4~ ~5 ~ ~3 575 ~ + 17~j~.51~ ~I ~3 ~ 3~ _~74~ ~10 576 ' ~ ~ each , Pine RidgeRd Golden Ga~ Pk~ 4~ 435 ~ 461 ~1 431 421 717 384 160 % 160 10-5 73 73 EXHIBIT 13 - COLLIER COUNTY 2010 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - NUMBER OF LANES Radio Rd Davis Blvd Number of Directional Lanes by Color 2 3 ~4 WilspnMiller \, ~.~ Immokalee Area 10-6 Corridor Study Immokelee Rd j EXHIBIT 14 - COLLIER COUNTY 2010 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - PSWT VOLUME RANGES B~ ,1 Radio Rd Davis B/vd PSWT Volume Ranges by Color ~ 80,000 to 85,000 ~ 60,000 to 80,000 40,000 to 60,000 ~ 25,000 to 40,000 12,000 to 25,000 .... 0 to 12,000 Immokalee Rd Rattlesnake Hammock Rd I I Immokalee Area Irnmokalee~ Rd ' WilspnMiller 10-7 EXHIBIT 15 - COLLIER COUNTY 2010 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - PSWT VOLUMES IN HUNDREDS ~88 .~2~4~ ~ 2~4~. 18_~ 49 45 45 ~52 ~}4__ ~ 3~ .~ 1~2 132 ...... ~ ' " ~ ~ ~ ~ , Immokalee Rd 83 83 g 129 149 ~ 503 3~[ ~ ~6 405 375 4~ ~~ 3~ 386 ~1 3~2 ~ ~38 ~ % ~7§.4~37 136 .~ ~ ~ 363 561 ~ 126 '~ ~ 8B '~ _9o : 424 ~13. 154 r '~2o~ ~ Immokalee Area ~ ~ Immokalee Rd I 10-8 62 62 EXHIBIT 16 - COLLIER COUNTY 2005 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - NUMBER OF LANES Immokalee Rd Radio Rd WilspnMiller Davis Blvd Number of Directional Lanes by Color 2 3 ~4 Corridor Study Ratt esnake Hammock Rd Immokalee Rd 1% \ /Immokalee Area 10-9 EXHIBIT 17 - COLLIER COUNTY 2005 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - PSWT VOLUME RANGES 'kwy Pine Ridge Rd Radio Rd PSWT Volume Ranges by Color ~ 80,000 to 85,000 ~ 60,000 to 80,000 ~ 40,000 to 60,000 '25,000 to 40,000 12,000 to 25,000 0 to 12,000 Immokalee Rd ~ I Immokalee Area L 1 WiispnMiller '- ~ '' ~ - ' ......... 10-10 EXHIBIT 18 - COLLIER COUNTY 2005 FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE MODEL - PSWT VOLUMES IN HUNDREDS r~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ /mmokalee/~d ' 248 72 72 ~ 118 ~43 ~ 417 ~1 ~ 275 ~2 ~3 383~13 ~3 295 287 285 2~ ~0 Golden G~ Pk~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2~ 2~7274 22~ 20~ 172 1~ 84 ~ 187 ~ ~Z7 ~69~ 374 374 ~2 33D. ;46~ m 112 %- · 24E 248 179 9 179 ,. · Immokalee Area WilsOnMiller 10-11 56 56 8B '~',.--~Collier ,, Long Range Transportation Plan Update 2025 11 - OTHER PLAN COMPONENTS This 2025 Update is intended to extend the horizon year of the 2020 LRTP. Other portions of the 2020 LRTP (not reproduced or amended herein) are to be considered valid until otherwise amended or deleted. The following LRTP components, listed here for information only, are incorporated into the 2025 LRTP Update by reference only. They are not intended to be updated as part of this project. Collier County 1990 Model Validation and Long-Range Plan Update (Amended February 1998 and December 1999) Public Transportation Component The Collier County Public Transportation Development Plan (June 1999, updated September 12, 2000) The Collier County Public Transportation Operations Plan (January 9, 2001) Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Enhancements Component Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan (December 16, 1994) Congestion Management System Naples (Collier County) Congestion Management System Manual (September 1997) Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Collier County is in the process of deploying ITS technology in the form of a coordinated traffic signal control system. This system will interconnect and coordinate most traffic signals in urban County. Signals will be coordinated with each other in a manner that allows groups of vehicles to efficiently move along a roadway corridor. Traffic detectors embedded in the roadways and closed circuit television cameras will allow system operators to adjust traffic signal timing to best meet the traffic conditions at that moment. The Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) Modal Plan recommends the deployment of ITS technology on 1-75 in Collier County. As specific ITS improvements and funding sources are identified, the MPC will consider including such enhancements as incident detection systems, variable message signs, and ramp metering in the Financially Feasible Plan. Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organzzation 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan Update--Final Report Adopted January 26, 2001 Other P/an Components, Page 1 Section 11, Page 1 TABLE 5-3 1990 COLLIER COUNTY FSUTMS MODEL VOLUME OVER COUNT SUMMARY STATISTICS AT/FT Desc'ription ....... v01'hme Over Volume 0ve~' Volume Over Group Count VMT* Count VHT* Count Volmne* FT 12 Other Freeway 1.04 1.05 1.03 FT 21 Divided Arterial 55mph 1.22 1.22 t. 17~ FT 22 Divided Arterial 45mph 0.89 0.89 0.93 FT 23 Divided Arterial I 1.00 1.01 1.02 FT 24 Divided Arterial II 0.96 0.95 0.96 FT 25 Divided Arterial I[I 1.08 1,07 1.05 Total Div. Arterial 1.00 1.00 1.00 FT 31 Undivided Arterial T/B 45mp'l~' 1.08 -- 1.08 1.-01 FT 32 Undivided Arterial T/B I 0.80 0.80 0.79 FT 35 Undivided Arterial NTB 45mph 1.06 1.05 1.06 FT 36 Undivided Arterial NTB I 0.92 0.92 0.92 Total Und Art 0.98 0.97 0.96 FT 4 i" Major Local Divided ....... 0.98 .......... 0.98 0.99 FT 42 Major Local T/B 0.62 0.62 0.72 FF 43 Major Local NTB 0.77 0.78 0.82 FT 44 Other Local Divided 0.40 0.40 0.40 FT 45 Other Local T/B 0.68 0.68 0.70 FT 46 Other Local NTB 0.71 0.75 0.70 FT 47 Local/Rural Collector 0.81 0.81 0.87 Total Collector 0.75 0.76 0.79 FT 71 High spee~i'"~nRamp 1.08 1.15 1,04 FT 72 Low Speed On Ramp 0.63 0.63 0.63 ;T 75 High Speed Off Ramp 1.07 1.09 1.03 Total Ramps 1.07 1.10 1.02 FT 95 "- Undivided Arter'i~l rrOll 1.03 "' 1.03 1.04 AT 12 Primary CBD 0.95 0.96 0.96 AT 14 Other CBD 1.07 1,07 1,07 Total CBD 0.97 0.97 0.97 iAT 21 CBD Fringe 1.00 0.99 1.01 'AT 31 Residential 0.88' 0.89 0,91 AT 32 Undeveloped Residential 1.00 1.00 1.00 AT33 Transitioning Residential 1.03 1,03 1.03 AT 34 Beach Residential 0.75 0.76 0.77 Total Residential 0.96 0.96 0.96 AT 42 Other OBD t.03 1.03 1.04 AT 43 Beach OBD 0.91 0.89 0.90 Total OBI) 1.0 t 1.00 1.02 Aq.~ 5~" Rural Undeveloped i.tl2 1.01 1.01 1 Lane Road 1.07 1.10 1.02 2 Lane Road 0.97 0.95 (11.92 4 Lane Road 0.97 0.97 0.c)9 6 1.anc Road 1.03 1.Ol 1.02 TABLE 5-4 1990 COLLIER COUNTY FSUTMS MODEL VOLUME-TO-COUNT RATIOS ON SCREENLINES Screenline Number Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 91 92 93 94 95 96 98 99 Lee/Collier County Line Pine Ridge Road North Pine Ridge Road South Golden Gate Pkwy South US 41/SR 951 Area Goodlette-Frank Road East Airport-Pulling Road East 1-75 East Everglades Boundary External Stations 1-75/Daniels Pkwy Interchange 1-75/Alico Rd Interchange 1-75/Corkscrew Rd Interchange 1-75/Bonita Beach Rd Interchange 1-75/Immokalee Rd Interchange 1-75/Pine Ridge Rd Interchange 1-75/SR 951 Interchange Misc. Counts 1990 Total "1990 Total 1990 V/C Total # Volume Count Ratio* of Links 91,605 81,800 1.12 4 117,049 117,300 1.00 7 135,160 141,400 0.96 7 147,560 151,000 0.98 6 53,263 55,500 0.96 2 152,553 [59,900 0.95 4 148,161 152,000 0.97 7 52,334 53,700 0.97 5 18,648 15,200 1.23 3 166,878 166,860 1.00 14 22,687 27,800 0.82 5 15,054 12,000 1.25 4 11,477 7,300 1.57 4 16,012 15,600 1.03 4 14,907 14,000 1.06 4 23,177 18,600 1.25 4 13,151 18,198 0.72 4 1,785,213 1,850,680 0.96 * FDOT acceptability ranges for screenlines are: -~/- 10% for screenlines with >75,000 total vpd from counts +/- 15?/0 for screenlines with 50,000-75,000 total vpd from counts +/- 20% for screcnlines with <50,000 total vpd from counts TABLE 5-5 1990 COLLIER COUNTY FSUTMS MODEL ROOT MEAN SQUARED ERROR SUMMARY Count Range (One-Way) FDOT Minimum 1990 Collier 1990 Collier Accuracy Range Revised Original ' ' 0-S',00~) " 45-"55 ............ 41.59% 39.15% 5,000-10,000 35-45 27.35% 24.89% 10,000-20,000 27-35 14.61% 15.84% 20,000-30,000 24-27 5.64% 9.84% Average Total 32-39 20.07% 20.05% 8B N.T.S. 6 5 9 I1. Lee/Collier County Line 10. External Stations I 2. Pine Ridge Road North 91. Daniels Pkwy. Interchange I 3. Pine Ridge Road South 92. Alico Road Interchange ~L 4. Golden Gate Parkway South 93. Corkscew Road Interchange ~. U.S. 41 / S.R. 951 Area 94. Bonita Beach Road Interchange ~, Goodlette - Frank Road East 95. Immokalee Road Interchange /. Airport- Pulling Road East 96. Pine Ridge Road Interchange 8.1-75 East 98. S.R. 951 Interchange 9, Everglades FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COLLIER COUNTY 1990 FSUTMS MODEL [~I~-VALIIDAT§O~ STUDY w 0 0 0 D~ ~ ua 0 o o re I- Z uJ ~ Z LU C~ ~- LU UJ 0 "'~ [3. O. Cl. '~e~n ~°uel '~euUel(1 P ue ~l.~!xe ol u°!ld~s/l~ le'quei°d 8B "'! d 8B '1 l- Z u.I ,,, 0 · .~ ~ 0 0 n- n- SeSn ~ue/ l~eu~,el~ I~ue ~ U Z w 0 ==~ n 0 0 ~' rr 8B I I I Z I I I 2005 3 0 lA + 3 0 37A + 3 0 39A + 3 0 83A + 3 0 100A + 3 0 188A + 3 0 213A 3 0 226A + 3 0 258A 3 0 304A + 3 0 306A + 3 0 323A + 3 0 335A + 3 0 381A 3 0 433A + 3 0 436A + 3 0 437A + 3 0 438A + 3 0 439A + 2010 3 0 423A + 3 0 37A + 3 0 39A + 3 0 83A + 3 0 100A + 3 0 188A + 3 0 213A + 3 0 226A + 3 0 258A + 3 0 304A + 3 0 306A + 3 0 323A + 3 0 335A + 3 0 381A + 3 0 433A + 3 0 436A + 3 0 437A + 3 0 438A + 3 0 439A + 2020 3 0 423A + 3 0 37A + 3 0 39A + 3 0 83A + 3 0 100A + 3 0 188A + 3 0 213A + 3 0 226A + 3 0 258A + 3 0 304A + 3 0 306A + 3 0 323A + 3 0 335A + 3 0 381A + 3 0 433A + 3 0 436A + 3 0 437A + 3 0 438A + 3 0 439A + 2025 3 0 423A + 3 0 37A + 3 0 39A + 3 0 83A + 3 0 100A + 3 0 188A + 3 0 213A + 3 0 226A + 3 0 258A + 3 0 304A + 3 0 306A + 3 0 323A + 3 0 335A + 3 0 381A + 3 0 433A + 3 0 436A + 3 0 437A + 3 0 438A + 3 0 439A + 18700 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 DANIELS PKWY (WEST) 42000 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 US 41 (NORTH) 7153 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 1-75 (NORTH) 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 BONITA BEACH PARK 1500 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 DOG TRACK 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 BAREFOOT BEACH PARK 12000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 WIGGINS STATE PARK & BE 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 VANDERBILT PUBLIC BEACH 3000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 CLAM PASS BEACHES 12500 35 35 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 COASTLAND MALL & FLEISC 3000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 LOWDERMILK PARK AREA BE 12500 40 0 10 40 10 0 0 0 0 0 NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPIT 12500 35 40 15 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 NAPLES CBD/CAMBIER PARK 10000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 TIGER TAIL BEACH 17000 6 0 0 69 25 0 0 0 0 0 AIRPORT 7338 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 TREELINE 0 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 LEE RD EXT 0 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 METRO PKWY 8115 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 THREE OAKS PKWY 15150 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 DANIELS PKWY (WEST) 42000 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 US 41 (NORTH) 7879 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 1-75 (NORTH) 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 BONITA BEACH PARK 1500 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 DOG TRACK 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 BAREFOOT BEACH PARK 12000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 WIGGINS STATE PARK & BE 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 VANDERBILT PUBLIC BEACH 3000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 CLAM PASS BEACHES 12500 35 35 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 COASTLAND MALL & FLEISC 3000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 LOWDERMILK PARK AREA BE 12500 40 0 10 40 10 0 0 0 0 0 NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPIT 12500 35 40 15 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 NAPLES CBD/CAMBIER PARK 10000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 TIGER TAIL BEACH 16160 6 0 0 69 25 0 0 0 0 0 AIRPORT 8561 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 TREELINE 1706 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 LEE RD EXT 32418 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 METRO PKWY 9468 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 THREE OAKS PKWY 8050 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 DANIELS PKVVY (WEST) 42000 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 US 41 (NORTH) 9332 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 1-75 (NORTH) 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 BONITA BEACH PARK 1500 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 DOG TRACK 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 BAREFOOT BEACH PARK 12000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 WIGGINS STATE PARK & BE 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 VANDERBILT PUBLIC BEACH 3000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 CLAM PASS BEACHES 12500 35 35 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 COASTLAND MALL & FLEISC 3000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 LOWDERMILK PARK AREA BE 12500 40 0 10 40 10 0 0 0 0 0 NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPIT 12500 35 40 15 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 NAPLES CBD/CAMBtER PARK 10000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 TIGER TAIL BEACH 14480 6 0 0 69 25 0 0 0 0 0 AIRPORT 11007 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 TREELINE 2558 12 I9 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 LEE RD EXT 48627 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 METRO PKWY 12173 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 THREE OAKS PKWY 4500 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 DANIELS PKWY (WEST) 42000 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 US 41 (NORTH) 10058 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 1-75 (NORTH) 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 BONITA BEACH PARK 1500 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 DQG TRACK 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 BAREFOOT BEACH PARK 12000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 WIGGINS STATE PARK & BE 4000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 VANDERBILT PUBLIC BEACH 3000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 CLAM PASS BEACHES 12500 35 35 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 COASTLAND MALL & FLEISC 3000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 LOWDERMILK PARK AREA BE 12500 40 0 10 40 10 0 0 0 0 0 NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPIT 12500 35 40 15 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 NAPLES CBDICAMBiER PARK 10000 0 0 70 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 TIGER TAIL BEACH 13640 6 0 0 69 25 0 0 0 0 0 AIRPORT 12230 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 TREELINE 3411 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 LEE RD EXT 64836 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 METRO PKWY 13525 12 19 14 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 THREE OAKS PKWY EETRIPS 2005 2010 9999 9999 101 101 421 421 422 422 = 560 101 101 421 421 422 422 = 580 101 101 421 421 431 431 = 33 101 101 421 421 431 431 = 38 101 101 421 421 432 432 = 13 101 101 421 421 432 432 = 14 101 101 422 422 421 421 = 560 I01 101 422 422 421 421 = 580 101 101 422 422 426 426 = 20 101 101 422 422 426 426 = 20 101 101 422 422 431 431 = 336 101 101 422 422 431 431 = 348 101 101 422 422 432 432 = 224 101 101 422 422 432 432 = 232 101 101 423 423 424 424 = 3603 101 101 423 423 424 424 = 4104 101 101 423 423 425 425 = 5935 101 101 423 423 425 425 = 6780 101 101 423 423 431 431 = 52 101 101 423 423 431 431 = 60 101 101 423 423 432 432 = 26 101 101 423 423 432 432 = 28 I01 101 423 423 433 433 = 3317 101 101 423 423 433 433 = 3840 101 101 424 424 423 423 = 3603 101 101 424 424 423 423 = 4104 101 101 424 424 431 431 = 3775 101 101 424 424 431 431 = 4300 101 101 424 424 432 432 = 323 101 101 424 424 432 432 = 347 101 101 424 424 433 433 = 6066 101 101 424 424 433 433 = 7022 101 101 425 425 423 423 = 5935 101 101 425 425 423 423 = 6780 101 101 425 425 433 433 = 853 101 101 425 425 433 433 = 987 101 101 426 426 422 422 = 20 101 101 426 426 422 422 = 20 101 101 427 427 428 428= 1014 101 101 427 427 428 428 = 1102 101 101 427 427 429 429 = 198 101 101 427 427 429 429 = 214 101 101 427 427 430 430 = 133 101 101 427 427 430 430 = 144 101 101 428 428 427 427 = 1014 101 101 428 426 427 427 = 1102 101 101 429 429 427 427 = 198 101 101 429 429 427 427 = 214 101 101 430 430 427 427 = 133 101 101 430 430 427 427 = 144 101 101 431 431 421 421 = 33 101 101 431 431 421 421 = 38 101 101 431 431 422 422 = 336 101 101 431 431 422 422 = 348 101 101 431 431 423 423 = 52 101 101 431 431 423 423 = 60 101 101 431 431 424 424 = 3775 101 101 431 431 424 424 = 4300 101 101 431 431 438 438= 0 101 101 431 431 438 438= 125 101 101 432 432 421 421 = 13 101 101 432 432 421 421 = 14 101 101 432 432 422 422 = 224 101 101 432 432 422 422 = 232 101 101 432 432 423 423 = 26 101 101 432 432 423 423 = 28 101 101 432 432 424 424 = 323 101 101 432 432 424 424 = 347 101 101 433 433 423 423 = 3317 101 101 433 433 423 423 = 3840 101 101 433 433 424 424 = 5923 101 101 433 433 424 424 = 6914 101 101 433 433 425 425 = 853 101 101 433 433 425 425 = 987 101 101 438 438 431 431 = 0 101 101 438 438 431 431 = 125 2020 2025 9999 9999 101 10I 421 421 422 422 = 620 101 101 421 421 422 422 = 640 101 101 421 421 431 431 = 47 101 101 421 421 431 431 = 51 101 101 421 421 432 432 = 16 101 101 421 421 432 432 = 17 101 101 422 422 421 421 = 620 101 101 422 422 421 421 = 640 101 101 422 422 426 426 = 20 101 101 422 422 426 426 = 20 101 101 422 422 431 431 = 372 101 101 422 422 431 431 = 384 101 101 422 422 432 432 = 248 101 101 422 422 432 432 = 256 101 101 423 423 424 424= 5106 101 101 423 423 424 424 = 5607 101 101 423 423 425 425 = 8471 101 101 423 423 425 425 = 9316 101 101 423 423 431 431 = 75 101 101 423 423 431 431 = 82 101 101 423 423 432 432 = 32 101 101 423 423 432 432 = 34 101 101 423 423 433 433 = 4885 101 101 423 423 433 433 = 5407 101 101 424 424 423 423 = 5106 101 101 424 424 423 423 = 5607 101 101 424 424 431 431 = 5349 101 101 424 424 431 431 = 5874 101 101 424 424 432 432 = 396 101 101 424 424 432 432 = 420 101 101 424 424 433 433 = 8933 101 101 424 424 433 433 = 9888 101 101 425 425 423 423 = 8471 101 101 425 425 423 423 = 9316 101 101 425 425 433 433 = 1256 101 101 425 425 433 433 = 1390 101 101 426 426 422 422 = 20 101 101 426 426 422 422 = 20 101 101 427 427 428 428 = 1277 101 101 427 427 428 428 = 1365 101 101 427 427 429 429 = 247 101 101 427 427 429 429 = 263 101 101 427 427 430 430 = 167 101 101 427 427 430 430 = _178 101 101 428 428 427 427 = 1277 101 101 428 428 427 427 = 1365 101 101 429 429 427 427 = 247 101 101 429 429 427 427 = 263 101 101 430 430 427 427 = 167 101 101 430 430 427 427 = 178 101 101 431 431 421 421 = 47 101 101 431 431 421 421 = 51 101 101 431 431 422 422 = 372 101 101 431 431 422 422 = 384 101 101 431 431 423 423 = 75 101 101 431 431 423 423 = 82 101 101 431 431 424 424 = 5349 101 101 431 431 424 424 = 5874 101 101 431 431 438 438 = 375 101 101 431 431 438 438 = 500 101 101 432 432 421 421 = 16 101 101 432 432 421 421 = 17 101 101 432 432 422 422 = 248 101 101 432 432 422 422 = 256 101 101 432 432 423 423 = 32 101 101 432 432 423 423 = 34 101 101 432 432 424 424 = 396 101 101 432 432 424 424 = 420 101 101 433 433 423 423 = 4885 101 101 433 433 423 423 = 5407 101 101 433 433 424 424 = 8897 101 101 433 433 424 424 = 9888 101 101 433 433 425 425 = 1256 101 101 433 433 425 425 = 1390 101 101 438 438 431 431 = 375 101 101 438 438 431 431 = 500 ZDATA4 20O5 4 0 421 15149 4 0 422 21200 4 0 423 2OO0 4 0 424 39116 4 0 425 10759 4 0 426 420 4 0 427 9206 4 0 428 3387 4 0 429 274 4 0 430 402 4 0 431 9368 4 0 432 1676 4 0 433 0 4 0 434 3244 4 0 435 4800 4 0 436 11350 4 0 437 0 4 0 438 0 4 0 439 12622 2O25 4 0 421 23676 4 0 422 21200 4 0 423 2000 4 0 424 44165 4 0 425 37079 4 0 426 420 4 0 427 26034 4 0 428 4570 4 0 429 347 4 0 430 536 4 0 431 16218 4 0 432 2261 4 0 433 0 4 0 434 8032 4 0 435 48OO 4 0 436 18775 4 0 437 5568 4 0 438 42416 4 0 439 20652 2O20 4 0 421 21544 4 0 422 21200 4 0 423 20OO 4 0 424 42903 4 0 425 3O499 4 0 426 42O 4 0 427 21827 4 0 428 4274 4 0 429 329 4 0 430 503 4 0 431 14506 4 0 432 2115 4 0 433 0 4 0 434 6835 4 0 435 48OO 4 0 436 16919 4 0 437 4176 4 0 438 31812 4 0 439 18645 2010 4 0 421 17281 4 0 422 21200 4 0 423 2000 4 0 424 40378 4 0 425 17339 4 0 426 420 4 0 427 13413 4 0 428 3683 4 0 429 292 4 0 430 436 4 0 431 11081 4 0 432 1822 4 0 433 0 4 0 434 4441 4 0 435 4800 4 0 436 13206 4 0 437 2784 4 0 438 21208 4 0 439 14630 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN '8B I1 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Prepared By Collier County Planning Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Symbol Date Amended Ordinance No. ** May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-25 *** May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-26 (I) May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-27 (11) May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-30 (111) May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-33 (IV) December 12, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-87 **** March 13, 2001 Ordinance No. 2001-11 (V) March 13, 2001 Ordinance No. 2001-12 (VI) May 14, 2002 Ordinance No. 2002-24 Ordinance No. 2000-25, rescinded and repealed in its entirety Collier County Ordinance No. 99-63, which had the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM). Ordinance No. 2000-26, amended Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, having the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM), more specifically portions of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element (Ord. No. 98-56), Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element (Ord. No. 97-59) and Drainage (Ord. No. 97-61) sub-elements of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element (Ord. No. 97-63), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (Ord. No. 97-64), Conservation and Coastal Management Element (Ord. No. 97-66), and the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map (Ord. No. 97-67); and re-adopts Policy 2.2.3 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Indicates adopted portions Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. **** Scrivener's Ordinance correcting omissions on Flue Map (VI) = Plan Amendments CP-2001-3,4,5,6 & 7 by Ordinance No. 2002-24 on May 14, 2002 (IV) 8B '11 Policy 1.3: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts: as described in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. ~ Policy 1.4: The CONSERVATION Future Land Use Designation shall include a Future Land Use District. Policy 1.5: Overlays and Special Features shall include: A. Area of Critical State Concern Overlay B. Areas of Environmental Concern Overlay C. Airport Noise Area Overlay D. Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay OBJECTIVE 2: The coordination of land uses with the availability of public facilities shall be accomplished through the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvements Element and implemented through the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance of the Land Development Code. Policy 2.1: The County shall prepare annually the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities which shall include a determination of the existing conditions of capital public facilities, determine the remaining available capacity, forecast future needs in the five year capital improvement schedule and identify needed improvements and funding to maintain the level of service adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of the Capital Improvements Element. Policy 2.2: Deficiencies or potential deficiencies that have been determined through the Annual Update and Inventory Report on capital public facilities may include the following remedial actions: establish an area of significant influence for roads, add projects to the Capital Improvements Element;. or defer development until improvements can be made; or amend the level of service is cmcndcd to ensure available capacity. Policy 2.3: Continue the Certificate of Adequate Public Facility ~ regulatory program, which requires the certification of public facility availability prior to the issuance of a final local development order. OBJECTIVE 3: Land Development Regulations have been adopted to implement this Growth Management Plan pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S. in order to ensure protection of natural and historic resources, the availability of land for utility facilities, promote compatible land uses within the airport noise zone, and to provide for management of growth in an efficient and effective manner. Policy 3.1: Land Development Regulations have been adopted into the Land Development Code that contain provisions to implement the Growth Management Plan through the development review process and include the following provisions: a. The Collier County Subdivision Code shall provide for procedures and standards for the orderly development and subdivision of real estate in order to ensure proper legal description, identification, documentation and recording of real estate boundaries and adequate infrastructure for development. 11 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT f..I;,,,,*l,, Aa, q,q,,,,~l I I,,-,,4-,~f,~ ~). Prepared By Collier County Planning Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT SYMBOL DATE AMENDED (I) February 23, 1999 (11) May 9, 2000 ORDINANCE NO. Ordinance No. 99-14 Ordinance No. 2000-31 Indicates adopted portion Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. Words ~'* ....~-*~' ..... ~' ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions III. * IV. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: Roads Projects Drainage Projects EMS Projects Jail Projects Library Buildings Projects Library Collection Government Buildings Projects Parks Projects Water Projects Sewer Projects Landfill Projects COST AND REVENUES PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION ANALYSIS (Support Documents) Public Facility Requirements Capital Improvements Projects Capital Improvement Financing Capacity Collier County School Board Capital Improvement Program Timing & Location of Capital Improvements: Current Local Practices Financing Plan Collier County Fifth Annual Update & Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities PaRe CIE -I CIE - 2 CIE - 17 CIE -26 CIE -27 CIE -29 CIE -3O CIE -31 CIE -32 CIE -33 CIE -36 CIE -42 CIE -46 CIE -47 CIE -49 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G ± Words "* .... I-~-hrr-,, ,,~h ............. U" are deletions -Words underlined are additions I. INTRODUCTION In 1985 and 1986 the Florida Legislature significantly strengthened the requirements for county and city comprehensive plans. One of the provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act is the requirement that the comprehensive plan must contain a Capital Improvement Element to "... consider the needs for and location of public facilities ..." (Section 163.3177(3), Florida Statutes). The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) must identify public facilities that will be required during the next five years, including the cost of the facilities, and the sources of revenue that will be used to fund the facilities. One of the specific requirements of the legislation states that the public facilities that are contained in the CIE must be based on "standards to ensure the availability of public facilities and the adequacy of those facilities including acceptable levels of service." The administrative regulation that implements the statutes defines the phrase "level of service" as "... an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by ... a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility." (Section 9J-5.003 (41), Florida Administrative Code). CIE- 1 Words o* .... t.,~. ..... ~ ............. u,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CONCURRENT WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN OR EXCEED ADOPTED STANDARDS FOR LEVELS OF SERVICE. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Identify and define types of public facilities for which the County is responsible, establish standards for levels of service for each such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities are needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. Policy 1.1.1: The County shall establish standards for levels of service for throe two categories of public facilities, as follows: Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in other elements of this comprehensive plan, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities. The standards for levels of service of Category A County provided public facilities shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the County's annual budget, and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan. The standards for levels of service of Category A facilities which are not County provided shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan, but shall not apply to the County's annual budget. Category B public facilities are facilities for the County's library, jail, and emergency medical services, "*~' ............ * ~',,~1'~; ..... ~ '~ .... ~"'* tiro '~o~'+" The standards for levels of service of Category B public facilities shall apply to the County's annual budget, but not apply to development orders issued by the County. Public facilities shall include land, structures, the initial furnishings and equipment (including ambulances, fire apparatus, and library collection materials), design, permitting, and construction costs. Other "capital" costs, such as motor vehicles and motorized equipment, computers and office equipment, office furnishings, and small tools are considered in the County's annual budget, but such items are not "public facilities" for the purposes of the Growth Management Plan, or the issuance of development orders. CIE- 2 Words struc~thrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions Policy 1.1.2: The quantity of public facilities except roadways that is needed to eliminate existing deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall be determined for each non-traffic public facility by the following calculation: O = (S x D) - I. Where Q is the quantity of public facility needed, S is the standard for level of service, D is the demand, such as the population, and I is the inventory of existing facilities. The calculation will be used for existing demand in order to determine existing deficiencies. The calculation will be used for projected demand in order to determine needs of future growth. The estimates of projected demand will account for demand that is likely to occur from previously issued development orders as well as future growth. (11) The County Commission will review all rezone requests and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall County-Wide density or intensity of permissible development with consideration of their impact on both the variable "D" in t_he formula Q = (S x D) - I, and tho overall roadway system. The County Commission shall not approve any such rezone request or FLUE amendment that significantly impacts "'~*~'"'" (!) .... ,4 ...... cogm~nt ""~",4 ....... *I ....,4/ ..... I"'"+'",4 *'-' operate '"'~*~';'- eno ~,,,,~, .... ~v,~j~ ~,~.~ vf.,~,~,,,bl .... '~' r"'vJ~'~ ~v .~,~,,,,, ..... '"*; ..... ;""*;""" through *~ ...... '~nnn "",4 than the BEBR medium range growth rate *~',, ,~, .... ~,,~,~*'--,~for the variable "D", unless one e~m-ece of the following simultaneously Occurs: (11) The adopted population standard used for calculation of "Q" in the formula Q = (S x D) - I is amended based on appropriate data and analysis; The Schedule of Capital Improvements is updated to include any necessary projects that would support the additional public facility demand(s) created by the rezone or amendment to the Future Land Use Element. Significant impact is hereby defined for Section B of this Policy as generating potential for increased County-Wide population greater than 5%1% of the BEBR high medium range population projections for Parks, Solid Waste, Water, Sewer and Drainage facilities, cr as There are three circumstances in which the standards for levels of service are not the exclusive determinant of need for a public facility: 1. Calculated needs for public facilities in coastal high hazard areas are subject to all limits and conditions in the Conservation and Coastal Management and Future Land Use Elements of this Growth Management Plan. CIE- 3 Words struckthrough are deletions - Words underlined are additions 8B (11) Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and repair, remodeling and renovation, will be determined by the Board of County Commissioners upon the recommendation of the County ,~,dm!nlstr~tor Manager. Public facilities that provide levels of service in excess of the standards adopted in this Growth Management Plan may be constructed or acquired at any time as long as the following conditions are met: the facility does not make financially unfeasible any public facility of the same type that is needed to achieve or maintain the standards for levels of service adopted in this Growth Management Plan, and the facility does not contradict, limit or substantially change the goals, objectives and policies of any element of this Growth Management Plan. Any public facility that is determined to be needed as a result of any of the factors listed in Section B and D of this Policy shall be included in the regular Schedule of Capital Improvements contained in this Capital Improvement Element. All capital improvement projects for such public facilities shall be approved in the same manner as the projects that are identified according to the quantitative analysis described in Section A of this policy. Policy 1.1,3: The quantity of traffic capacity on the county's arterial and collector road system, including location, needed to eliminate deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall be determined for each road seqment by one or more of the following: A traffic impact analysis to demonstrate adequate capacity as determined by the Transportation Concurrency Management System on road se.qments that would be impacted by a development order at the time of approval of the final site development plan (SDP), final subdivision plat or its equivalent. The County Commission shall not approve any rezone requests and or proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), which will .qenerate a volume of traffic equal to or qreater than 1% of the minimum Level Of Service peak hour volume of an impacted deficient road segment, unless specific miti.qating stipulations are approved in coniunction with the rezone or amendment to restore or maintain each road se.qment's adopted level of service. Pe~,iey4Fl-,,l+Polic¥ 1.1.4 The determination of location of improvements to expand public facilities will take into consideration the projected growth patterns as identified in the County's annual population projections. Where applicable, public facility improvements will be coordinated with the capital facility plans of any other governmental entity providing public facilities within Collier County. Peliey-l~l~4~Policy 1.1.5 Public facility improvements within a category are to be considered in the following order or priority: Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service. B. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies in levels of service. CIE- 4 Words "* ....~'*~ ..... ~- ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years, as updated by the annual review of the Capital Improvement Element. the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the capital improvements will be scheduled in the following priority order to serve: 1. previously approved orders permitting redevelopment, 2. previously approved orders permitting new development, 3. new orders permitting redevelopment, and 4. new orders permitting new developments. Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility. New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years by either: 1. providing excess public facility capacity that may be needed by future growth beyond the next five fiscal years, or providing higher quality public facilities than are contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for such facilities. In Pelit, y-lgk~: Policy 1.1.6 The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: Cate.qory A Public Facilities Arterial and collector roads, includin.q state hi.qhways not on the Florida Intrastate Hi.qhway System FIHS) A1 '"'vv....~,*" Roadways: A1.1 r- .... *" Aarterials and collector roads: Level of Service as indicated .... below on the basis of peak hour,-F~i~a-k-seaee~ traffic volume: Level of Service "E" on the following designated roads: Roads Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road US 41 From - To Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Airport-Pulling Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway to US 41 ^: .... * Pulling ~a~ US 41 to '-~ Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard to Old US 41 Airport-Pulling Road Airport-Pullin.q Road Davis Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Livin.qston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Golden Gate Parkway Pine Ridqe Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Airport-Pullin.q Road US 41 to Airport-Pullin.q Road Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road US 41 to Gulfshore Drive A1.2 Level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season on all other County and State (not on the FIHS) arterial and collector roadsT, h ......... any """*~"" ''~ ,~,.,,4 ......... *~ at ~ .... ~ of ~'~ "~" for .... ;~ ~,, ...... ~ + .... ~, ...... ~,, .... ~ ,h~ ~,~,;o~ of Levo! ............ prcvids *~c ~' '-*,, '"'~*~ *~ *~ rostoro ' .... ' ~ ~-';~ ,,n,, h,, CIE- 5 Words ~+ ....~m ..... k ............. u,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions (I))(11) A2 1-75 US 41 SR 94 8B State and Federal Roads: Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for state roads with the exception of those on the Florida Intrastate Hi,qhway System (FIHS). In Collier County FDOT sets and maintains the LOS for 1-75. The standards for 1-75 are as follows: EXISTING TRANSITIONING RURAL AREA URBANIZED AREA URBANIZED AREA B C C DC D D D D D D D D D CIE- 6 Words struckthro'Jgh are deletions - Words underlined are additions (I)(II) A3 A3.1 A3.2 (I) A4 A4.1 A4.2 A4.3 (I) A5 A5.1 A5.2 A5.3 (11) A6 A6.1 A6.2 A7 A7.1 A7.2 A7.3 Category B B1 B2 B3 B4 County Surface Water Management Systems: 8B Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74-50 and 90-10. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing levels of service identified (by design storm return frequency event) by the completed portions of the Water Management Master Plan as listed in the Drainage/VVater Management Subelement of the Public Facilities Element. County Potable Water Systems: County systems County Water District - 185 gallons per capita per day Goodland Water District - 163 gallons per capita per day City of Naples = 163 gallons per capita per day City of Everglades - 163 gallons per capita per day in incorporated service area Private potable water systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.3.1 of the Potable Water Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. County Sanitary Sewer Systems: County systems: North Sewer Service Area = 145 gallons per capita per day South Sewer Service Area = 121100 gallons per capita per day City of Naples = 121 gallons per capita per day Private sanitary sewer systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.2.1 of the Sanitary Sewer Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities: Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years Ten years of permittable capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years. County Parks and Recreation Facilities: Regional Park land = 2.9412 acres per 1,000/pop. Community Park land = 1.2882 acres per 1,000/pop. Recreation facilities = ~ $240 capital investment per capita fo* ....... * cost) Public Facilities: County Library Buildings: 0.33 square feet per capita County Library Collection: 1.35 2.05 books per capita by FY 10 County Jail: 0.0024 beds per capita (2.4 beds per 1000 population) County Emergency Medical Service: .000068 EMS units per capita (1 Unit/15,000 Population) CIE- 7 Words struckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions B6.! O1 C! .! C! .2 02 C2.1 C2.2 C3 C3.1 (" "40 C4.1 C5 C5.! C6.! C6.2 C7 C7.1 C7.3 8B ................................. ~ .......... protect meas~rab!= =tandard) F:dcr:! :nd St:ts Porks: St2tc Recreation Aro3: CIE- 8 Words struckthreugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions ,r8B C7.d r,7 c !. Backetba!! Courts 2. Batch2!! Fields 4. Beat Ramps 5. Bike Trails ~ =~m~,, Fie!ds ~ ~ ..... k~ Pits ! 6. Tennis Courts ! 7. Vc!!cyba!! Courts ; ="'cm'~' Fie!ds = ~/5-~,~ ..... 6. Pavilions = ~.¢~ ,DI'~ ,A, rcas j, 9. Tennis Courts = CIE- 9 Words o* .... ~-*~- ..... ~, ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions 8B C9 C!! to u~ablc cpon ~pace CIE -10 Words "* .... ~'+k ..... ~' ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY OBJECTIVE 1.2: Provide public facilities in order to maintain adopted level of service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund, or within the County's authority to require others to provide. Existing facility deficiencies measured against the adopted level of service standards will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and intergovernmental revenues received based on economic activity. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special assessments and taxes. Policy 1.2.1: The estimated capital expenditures for all needed public facilities shall not exceed conservative estimates of revenues from sources that are available to the County pursuant to current law, and which have not been rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required to enact a source of revenue. Policy 1.2.2: Existing and future development shall both pay for the costs of needed public facilities. Existing development shall pay for some or all facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, some or all of the replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and may pay a portion of the cost of facilities needed by future development. Both existing and future development may have part of their costs paid by grants, entitlements or public facilities from other levels of government and independent districts. Policy 1.2.3: Public facilities financed by County enterprise funds (i.e., potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste) may be financed by debt to be repaid by user fees and charges for enterprise services, or the facilities may be financed from current assets (i.e., reserves, surpluses and current revenue). Policy 1.2.4: Public facilities financed by non-enterprise funds (i.e., roads, surface water management, parks, library, emergency medical service, and jail, other gcvcrnm~nt~,~,,~,, ~', ,~',4~ shall be financed from current assets (pay-as-you-go financing) except as otherwise provided in this policy. Public facilities financed by non-enterprise funds shall not be financed by debt unless such borrowing is the only financing technique available that will enable the County to provide facility capacity sufficient to meet standards for levels of service concurrent with new development. Debt financing shall not be used to provide excess capacity in non-enterprise public facilities unless the excess capacity is an unavoidable result of a capital improvement that is needed to achieve or maintain standards for levels of service. Notwithstanding other provisions of this policy, general obligation bonds approved by referendum may be used for any public facilities to acquire capacity needed within the five year capital improvements plan or for excess capacity. Policy 1,2.5: The County shall not provide a public facility, nor shall it accept the provision of a public facility by others, if the County is unable to pay for the subsequent annual operating and maintenance costs of the facility. CIE-11 Words struckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions (11) 8B Policy 1.2.6: The County shall continue to collect Road Impact Fees for road facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1 .,~_ of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance transportation improvements necessitated by such development. Policy 1.2.7: The County shall continue to collect impact fees for Parks and Recreation~ EMS and Library facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1 .§6 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance Parks and Recreation, EMS and Library improvements necessitated by such development. Policy 1.2.8: If, for any reason, the County cannot provide revenue sources identified as needed funding for specific projects within the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements, the Growth Management Plan shall be amended based on one or more of the following actions: Remove through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements that exceed the adopted levels of service for the growth during the next five (5) fiscal years; Remove from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities that reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility but do not provide additional facility capacity; Where feasible, transfer funds from a funded Non-Capital Improvement Element capital project in order to fund an identified deficient Capital Improvement Element public facility. The resulting revisions shall be reflected in the required annual update. Lower the adopted level of service standard through a plan amendment for the facility for which funding cannot be obtained. Do not issue development orders that would continue to cause a deficiency based on the facility's adopted level of service standard. Policy 1.2.9: Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources of 13%. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self-imposed level of constraint. Current bondable revenues are ad valorem taxes and State-shared revenues, specifically gas taxes and the half-cent sales tax. The Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy. CIE-12 Words ctruckthrouGh are deletions - Words underlined are additions 8B PUBLIC EXPENDITURES: COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA OBJECTIVE 1.3: Effective with plan implementation public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area shall be limited to those facilities needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the Future Land Use Element. In addition, public expenditures shall include the following categories: A. Maintenance of existing public facilities; B. Beach, shore and waterway access; C. Beach renourishment. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high hazard area for the replacement and maintenance of public facilities identified in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 1.3.2: The calculated needs for public facilities will be based on the adopted level of service standards and future growth projections within the coastal high hazard area. The Future Land Use Element limits new residential development (thus obligations for infrastructure expenditures) to a maximum of four dwelling units per gross acre within portions of the coastal high hazard area. Policy 1.3,3: The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and will develop a program to expand the availability of such including funding options for acquisition. ,A,i+~,~ .... :,'sar ~'~ adoption '-'~ CIE-13 Words -'* .... ~-*~' ..... ~' ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions PROVIDE NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS OBJECTIVE 1.4: The County shall coordinate its land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital improvements by providing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders. Policy 1.4.1: The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in the ,, c~,:,,-, ,, ,v,.,~,, v,,,,.,,~ '~ ..... ,,. ~,-,,,v, r,~,.,~,~v~,~,.~, Improvements Programs to Ensure Implementation" section of this Capital Improvement Element. The Schedule of Capital Improvements may be modified as follows: A. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be updated annually. Bo Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3187, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, developments of regional impact, and certain small scale development activities. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3177, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be - adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan. Policy 1,4.2: All Category A public facility capital improvements shall be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Policy 1.4,3: The County shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget all the public facility projects listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements for expenditures during the appropriate fiscal year. Projects for which appropriations have been made in the annual budget will not be removed once they have been relied upon for the issuance of a final site development plan, final plat, building permit or the functional equivalent of each. The County m~y alcc shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget additional public facility projects that conform to Policy 1.1.2 (B.@2), 1.1.3 ~,--.--~R°~m and Policy 1.1.45(C) and (E). Policy 1,4,4: The County shall determine, prior to the issuance of final site development plans, final plats and building permits, or the functional equivalent of each, whether or not there is sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to met the standards for levels of service for existing population and the proposed development. No final site development plan, final plat, building permit, or the functional equivalent of each, shall be issued unless the levels of service for the resulting development will achieve the standards in Policy 1.1 .§6, Category A, and the requirements for Concurrency Management as outlined in the policies within Objective 1.5 of this element are met. Policy 1,4.5: Public facilities and services provided by Collier County with public funds in accordance with the 5-year Schedule of Capital Improvements in the Capital Improvements Element will be limited to Service Areas established within the boundaries designated on Map PW-1 titled, "Collier County's Three (3) Water and/or Sewer Districts Boundaries" and PW-3 titled, "Rural Transition Water & Sewer District" appearing in the Public Facilities Element for water and sewer. Road improvements will be provided as CIE -14 Words o* ....~-*~' ..... ~' are deletions - Words underlined are additions designated on Maps TR-4W and TR-4E as updated annually titled, "5-year Capital Improvement Element Map", appearing in the Traffic O!rcu!~tion Transportation Element. All other public facilities and service types will be provided on a County-Wide availability basis. CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE 1.5: To ensure that public facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development, the County's Concurrency Management System shall be consistent with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-5.0055, Florida Administrative Code. The County shall establish a regulatory and monitoring program to ensure the scheduling, funding and timely construction of Category A public facilities concurrent with, or prior to, the issuance of a building permit to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards. Policy 1.5.1: The concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage and Solid Waste Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development plan, final plat, building permit, or the functional equivalent of each is issued; or Bo The necessary facilities and services are under construction at the time a final site development plan, final plat, building permit, or the functional equivalent of each is issued; or The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of paragraphs A and B of this policy. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. The agreement must guarantee that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the development occur. Policy 1.5.2: The concurrency requirement for the Parks and Recreation~,"""4,~ ,--,,-,,-,,,v,..~,, Spccc Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policy 1.5.1 A, B and C is met; or At the time the final site development plan, final plat, building permit, or functional equivalent of each is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed contract which provides for commencement of actual construction of the required facilities within one year of the issuance of the final site development plan, final plat, building permit, or functional equivalent of each; or The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement which requires the commencement of the actual construction of the facilities within one year of the issuance of the applicable final site development plan, final plat, or building permit, or the functional equivalent of each. An enforceable development CIE -15 Words o* ....~-*~' ..... ~' ............. u,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Policy 1.5,3: The concurrency requirement of the Traffic Circ'~'!ation Transportation Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are is met: A. Compliance with any one of the followinq standards~v, ,v,,,, ,,, ,t"t~'F and 1.5.2 B and C !s met; or 1. Adequate capacity exists on all siqnificantly impacted roadway se.qments pursuant to the transportation concurrency mana.qement system determination procedure in the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, or 2. Improvements necessary to maintain adequate capacity are under construction, or 3. The necessary improvements are .quaranteed in an enforceable and executed development aqreement in which the improvements are completed or under construction before the impacts from the development or phased development accrue to the roadway system. B. In areas in which Collier County has committed to provide the necessary public facilities and services in accordance with its five-year schedule of capital improvements, the concurrency requirement of the Traffic O!rculatlon Transportation Level of Service Standards would shall be ach!eyed or maintained if ~II of th~ fo!iow!,n~ sta,ndardc of tho ~'"'*"'~' based upon an Adequate Capital Improvements r-~, ............ ,~,, v, ,~ Management ~, ....... Program and adequate implementing regulations are mot as follows: 6.5, A Capital Improvement Element and a five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which, in addition to meeting all of the other statutory and rule requirements, must be financially feasible. The Cap!tal Improvement E!emont and ~ched'~'le of Capital Improvements ma:,' ...... ~ .... '~ ~""" ,'~'- * ....... *'~*~ ..... ~,'"'*o ~, ,~ ;~ tho A five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which must include both necessary facilities to maintain the adopted level of se~ice standards to se~e the new development proposed to be permitted and the necessary facilities required to eliminate those portions of existing deficiencies which are a priority to be eliminated during the five-year period under the Schedule of Capital Improvements. A realistic, financially feasible funding system based on currently available revenue sources which must be adequate to fund the public facilities required to se~e the development authorized by the building permit and which public facilities are included in the five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements. A five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which must include the estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion. A ~;~,~ ~,nn~ ~h~, ,1~ n~ ~;~1 I~n~,,~ ,~,hl~h ~,,~+ ~n~ ~h~ ~11 A plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or delay construction of any road project which is needed to maintain the adopted level of se~ice standard and which is listed in the five-year Schedule of Improvements. CIE-16 Words struckthreugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions Policy 1.5,4: The County shall continue to implement a Concurrency Management System, as identified in the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance No. 96-53, codified in Division 3.15 of the Collier County Land Development Code, which shall include a regulatory program and monitoring system consistent with this Growth Management Plan and consistent specifically with the policies under Objective 1.5 of this Capital Improvement Element. The objective of the Concurrency Management regulatory system for traffic is to insure that the adopted LOS on any roadway seqment is not exceeded by new development. For roadway segments operating over 75% of the roadway's service capacity, the concurrency mana.qement system will address further impacts to the LOS on the segment until additional capacity is provided. The monitoring system shall enable the County to determine whether it is adhering to the adopted Level of Service Standards and whether its Schedule of Capital Improvements is adequate. REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The Schedule of Capital Improvements on the following pages will eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out facilities, and make available adequate facilities for future growth. Each project is numbered and named, and its cost during each of the next five fiscal years is shown in thousands of dollars (000). The month and year for actual commencement of construction and the month and year each project will be completed (in service) is indicated. Each project in Category A is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element and the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Each project in Category B is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this' element. Optional elements were not developed for Category B facilities. CIE -17 Words struckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions 8B "~ UJ o o o c~ ~D 0 L~ ~D 0 I.-. Z UJ UJ --I LU I-- Z UJ I.IJ 0 .-I 0 Z o ILl .-I --I 0 zI E ~ E h', I-- 0 <~ uJ (.3 W 0 0 (:3 8B I-"- Z U.I .-I Z o Z o --I -.I © 0 Z UJ o 0 0 ~0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8B "'~ F- UJ o LO 0 LO b'-, L~ b',- 0 0 L~ I'"- 0 0 o o o o o o I,-- Z u.I LU ..J ILl I-' Z U,J I,IJ o n- ,,.J I,- (.3 n-' UJ >- Z 0 0 I.U ,..J 0 0 I-- W I- UJ '""3 0 o o o I-- Z IJ.I -.I I.%J I.- Z LI.I I.IJ 0 -J ._1 -J zI 0 a~ o o o o ~z §.=_g C) LU 0 n- p- O p- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L~ o g g I-- Z LU UJ --I U.I Z LU UJ 0 ,-I D. UJ I.- Z 0 0 LU --I ,-.I 0 I-- 0 Il: 0 rr 0 0 0 0 C; 13) 0 .._1 0 h- Z 0 Z LU LU -J uJ Z LU 0 -J D. 0 h- Z 0 0 UJ -J 0 Z LU ~U -J Z U~ LU D. LU Z 0 0 UJ -J -J 0 o ~ o o0 o ° o Z I- Z LU LU o DC O. --I DC ,,, 0 LU --] o ,,, o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~J ~d 8B I-- Z uJ Ltl I-- Z UJ UJ 0 O. .-I Z 0 Ltl .-I .-I 0 I.- Z I,.IJ ..I Z L~ o n,-' -.I n" ILl >- I--' Z o n'- .J ..I 0 0 I.- I-. 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o o o'~ o Z LU I-- Z u.I IJJ 0 n" n .-I I'- n" LU >,- I-- Z 0 0 n- I.LI .,.I ...I 0 0 I.- Z .-I I-. Z I..U 0 n,- .-I ILl t-- Z 0 n" I.U .-.I ,-.I 0 I- Z uJ LU .-J ILl Z ILl UJ 0 .-I I'-- U.J >- I.- Z 0 n- LU ..J 0 LU o -J 81t 0 0 0 C) I,- Z LU u.I -J Ltl I-- Z LU LLI o n,' .-I o ILl :>- H- Z ;I o o o Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 Z u.I I-- Z uJ UJ 0 .-I Ltl 0 n- LU --] --I 0 k- Z 8B II zI I.- Z tU Ltl .-I UJ I-- Z UJ rtl 0 13: .-I 0 LU >,- Z 0 LU .-I 0 zI uJ 8 B '"i ti. tn -I o ,,i I- Z 0 I- Z UJ .-I uJ I- Z u.I Ltl 0 ff- >.. Z 0 .-I ..J 0 zI I-- Z U.I -J tel Z UJ rtl 0 ..=1 I-- Ltl >.- k- Z 0 0 I,Ll ..J 0 0 IAI '~ 8B "i I-- Z LM 1.1.1 ,.J ILl I-- Z u,J LU 0 n-' --I 0 n,- I.U >.. >.. I-- Z 0 n'- LU ...I --I 0 0 0 rr _~ o~ I.-. 0 LU 0 COSTS & REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY) q)(ll) In the table below, the left column itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The center column contains the 5-year (F-Y-gB-O~(FY02-06) amounts of restricted revenues. The right column is a calculation of the deficit for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. Below the subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue that will be used by the County to pay for the deficit in order to maintain the standards for levels of service listed in CIE Policy 1.1.8._6 (I)(II)COUNTY ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS LESS Available Revenues: Gas Taxes $67,063,700 Road Impact Fees 58,900,800 Carry Forward 52,379,216 Miscellaneous 9,797,700 STATE ROADS Balance Balance $477,201,000 188,141,416 (289,059,584) (8,2OO,OOO) DRAINAGE PLANS AND PROJECTS Less Available Revenues: SFWMD 326,000 FDEP 9,874,000 Naples 60,000 Balance 18,808,000 10,260,000 (8,548,000) (II)WATER & SEWER SYSTEMS LESS System Development Fees/User Fees SOLID WASTE/LANDFILL Balance Balance 155,422,000 155,422,000 0 (II)PARKS & RECREATION LESS Available Revenues: Park Impact Fees Bonds/Cash Boating Improvement Funds 44,323,000 750,000 Balance 45,073,000 45,073,000 0 CIE - 47. ~. (II)EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE Less EMS Impact Fees (II)JAIL (II)LIBRARYBULDINGS AND BANKS Less Library Impact Fees Balance Balance Balance 6,650,000 2,341,000 (4,309,000) 15,703,000 6,828,000 (8,875,000) (Il)Subtotal of Restricted Revenue vs. Costs (II)ADD Unrestricted Revenues: General Fund Revenues Balance (318,991,584) 318,991,584 CIE- 48 PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION 8B Through continued implementation of adopted land development regulations the following programs have been implemented to ensure that the goals, objectives and policies established in the Capital Improvement Element will be achieved or exceeded. 1._..._....,='""";"'~ .~"'"':+...... Development Order Review As part of the review of all applications for final site development plans, final plats, building permits, or the functional equivalent of each, the County will determine whether or not there will be sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for the existing population and for the proposed development in accordance with the requirements of the Concurrency Management System. As part of the review for all development orders havin.q ne.qative impacts on Cateqory A Public Facilities other than final site development plans, final plats, buildin.q permits, or the functional equivalent of each, the County will determine whether or not sufficient capacity of Cate.qory A public facilities is planned for construction concurrent with the impacts on levels of service that will be created by the proposed development durinq the next five fiscal years. ~32. Impact Fees Impact Fee Ordinances will require the same standard for the level of service as is required by Policy 43. Annual Bud,qet The annual budget will include in its capital appropriations all projects in the Schedule of Capital Improvements that are planned for expenditures during the next fiscal year. 84. Semiannual Report The mandatory semiannual report to the Department of Community Affairs concerning amendments to the comprehensive plan due to emergencies, developments of regional impact and selected small developments will report on changes, if any, to adopted goals, objectives and policies in the Capital Improvement Element. 65. Update of Capital Improvement Element The monitoring of and adjustment to the Capital Improvement Element to meet the changing conditions must be an ongoing process. Beginning in August of each year, the element will be updated in conjunction with the County's budget process and the release of the official BEBR population estimates and projections. The update will include: 1. Revision of population projections; 2. Updates of facility inventory; 3. Update of unit costs; Update of facilities requirements analysis to project 10 year needs (by fiscal year) in order to program projects to meet the service standards. 5. Update of revenue forecasts in order to evaluate financial feasibility and the County's CIE 49 ability to finance capital improvements needed to meet the service standards Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next five years. The first year's schedule of projects will be incorporated into the County's budget effective October 1st. 7. Update of the public school and health facilities analysis. 76. Concurrency Management System The County has established a Concurrency Management System by adoption of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The system consists of the following components: The Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR),,""""'I*'"~ ........... .... ~ ,v~v,,-"'r* on the capacity and levels of service of public facilities compared to the standards for levels of service adopted in Policy 1.1 .§6 of this Element. The AUIR rc~crt summarizes the actual capacity of existing public facilities and forecast the capacity of existing and planned public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years. For the purposes of long range capital facility planning, a ten year forecast of projected needed capacity is also done. These forecasts are based on the most recently updated Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvement Element. The annual approval of the AUIR and the identified needed proiects and revenues by the Board of County Commissioners This ~,q,",u~l rc~crt constitutes evidence of the capacity and levels of service of Cateqory Apublic facilities, except roads, for the purpose of issuing development orders during the 12 months following ::Fthe approval .... ~"'*I'"" of the AUIR a~. This ,,..~v,, *~"~ ^ ..... '~ ~"'~*" ~'-'~ Inw~tc,"¥ R~pcrt "'"' ~,,~"~" ~,,,-.a~,~,,o ~^~ ~,~ The Transportation Concurrency Mana.qement System will determine the adequacy of roads impacted by a development at final approval of site development plan (SDP), subdivision plat buildin.q permit, or the functional equivalent of each. Public facility capacity review. The County shall use the procedures specified in Implementation Programs 1 and 26 to enforce the requirements of Policies 1.5.1, 1.5.2 and 1.5.3 of this Element. Review of changes in planned capacity of public facilities. The County shall review each amendment to this Capital Improvement Element in particular any changes in standards for levels of service and changes in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in order to enforce the policies of this Element. Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies. The County shall annually review the Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies that are incorporated in this Capital Improvement Element: Standards for levels of service are applied within appropriate geographical areas of the County. Standards for County-Wide public facilities are applied to development orders based on levels of service throughout the County. Standards for public facilities that serve less than the entire County are applied to development orders on the basis of levels of service within assigned areas. Levels of service are compared to adopted standards for Category A facilities, except roads, in the AUIR. Levels of service for roads are compared to adopted standards by a real time analysis that relates the percentaqe of the roadway's capacity consumed by existing and permitted development to the schedule for capacity improvements prior to approval of the final site development plan (SDP), CIE 50 -8B subdivision plat, building permit, or the functional equivalent of each. On +~ following annual monitoring corresponds to annual expenditures for capital improvements during the County's fiscal year; and b. annual monitoring covers seasonal variations in levels of service. 87. Second 5-year Evaluation and Appraisal Report The required second 5-year evaluation and appraisal report will address the implementation of the goals, objectives and policies of the Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring procedures necessary to enable the completion of the 5-year evaluation include: a. Review of annual reports of the Concurrency Management System; Review of semiannual reports to DCA concerning amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and Review of annual updates of this Capital Improvement Element, including updated supporting documents. CIE 51 8B COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Symbol Date Amended ** October 28, 1997 (I) February 23, 1997 (11) May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 97-62 Ordinance No. 99-13 Ordinance No. 2000-32 This is the EAR-based amendment. Due to the magnitude of the changes - which included reformatting the entire Element, affecting every page of the Element - a Roman Numeral is not assigned. Indicates adopted portions Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. Words °*" '"'~'+~ .....~' ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions TABLE OF CONTENTS 8B SECTION PURPOSE SYSTEM OVERVIEW D. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS* 1. Land Use Projections * 2. Travel Demand Patterns* 3. Traffic Circulation Constraints* 4. Future Traffic Circulation Map -2000* 5. Future Traffic Circulation Map -2010' 6. Future Traffic Circulation Map -2020* E. INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION* 1. Non-motorized Travel* 2. Aviation* 3. Transit* PERSPECTIVES* 1. Land Use Issues* 2. Marco Island Airport Impacts* 3. Inter-agency Coordination Cooperation* 4. Funding of Roadway Improvements* G. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY* H. GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES* PAGE T~ A kl_'~ 'rD A I~1_'1 TD A I~1 ") 37 70 65 i Words 6, .... ~.,~, ..... ~. ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions T~BL£ !A MAP TD_I A%AI TR-!AE TD_I t~,%AI TD_I TO 1 t'~: TD_I r'tiAI LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES 8B Annual Average n~;i,, ~,;~ x/~ ..... *~' Urban TO A KI_01 TD A kl_,'~,'~ TD A I~.1_"~ A TI:) A TD A kl_'2YN 41 LIST OF MAPS TR~.N-3 TO A kl_,'! TD A I~Ll' Existing Numbor of Lcnes 'I'D TO h kl_"P' TDAKI n TD AKI_n ii Words o* .... ""'~ ..... ~' ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions TR-! F-3 T~_t mm A TR-I F-5 (11) TR-3 (11) TR-4W TR-4E TR-5AW TR-5AE TR-5BW TR-5BE TR-5CW TR-5CE TR-5D (11) TR-SAW '- ....... +;"'~ Routos and Pcdestricn Facilitlas Rural Area Conditions ~^/,-...+,~.,. ,.-,,-,.];,~, r, .... +,, Traffic Circulation Constraints - Western Collier County* 5 Year Capital Improvement Element Map 2001 Existing Number of Lanes Functional Classification Map Adopted Minimum LOS Standards - Year 2001 Levels of Service - Year 2001 Evacuation Routes - Year 2001 Number of Lanes- Year 2010 Evacuation Routes - Year 2010 Number of Lanes - Year 2025 Levels of Service - Year 2025 89 '!! PAGE TRAN-!0 TRAN-11 TRAN-12 TP, AN-!3 TRAN-14 TRAN-!5 TrI A KI_'I ~ TRAN-3S - 39 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 5O 111 Words °* .... ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions MAP TR-6AE (11) TR-6BW TR-6BE (11) TR-6CW TR-6CE (11) TR-SD (11) TR-7AW TR-7AE (11) TR-7BW TR-7BE (11) TR-7CW TR-7CE (11) TR-7D T~- 7~-~ MT-! £ LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES (continued) PAGE Year 2001 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Western Collier 51 Year 2001 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Immokalee 52 Year 2001 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Marco 53 Year 2001 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities- Everglades City 54 Year 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities- Western Collier 55 Year 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Immokalee 56 Year 2001 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Marco 57 Year 2001 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities- Everglades City 58 Transit Route 1 59 Transit Route 2 60 Transit Route 3 61 Transit Route 4 62 Transit Route 5 64 V~.. orion ~; .... I~ ~ D~a~+.~ :~,~+~.~ _ Marco lcl~nd ~ .... ~-~° .............. ~ 75 iv Words "* .... u,~, ..... h ............. ~,, are deletions- Words underlined are additions 8B D. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS 1. T ~! I-To~ 0~:~,:~ Travel Demand The MPO Long Range Transportation Plan's Financially Feasible Plan and Needs Plan as adopted on March 23, 2001, are hereby incorporated to define the major roadway needs for Collier County. The refinement of these plans to incorporate updates to the MPO's Plan, development of a collector road system and results of corridor specific studies, shall occur on a regular basis upon approval of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC). fac ', or adding, a nc':,'. ...... ] .............. ~ ....................................... or .... ~, ..... 37 Words struckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions ~. 2. Traffic Circulation Constraints In many parts of the Naples Urban Area, traffic circulation movements are constrained by the natural features of the landscape such as the Gordon River. Still other parts offer constraints of the man-made variety, such as golf courses and the Naples Airport. In many instances approved developments (some existing, others not yet built) block the way of logical extensions of urban collector and arterial roads. Map TR-3 depicts many of the traffic circulation constraints identified during the alternatives development phase of this plan. The single most noticeable constraint is the Gordon River as it extends from the Naples Bay - northward under the East Tamiami Trail (US 41) to its connection with the Golden Gate canal system. The characteristics of the highway network at this location resembles an "hour-glass". On the western extreme, US 41 and Goodlette Road converge on the narrow "straits" of the Gordon River bridge, while to the east, US 41 and Davis Boulevard do likewise. The result is the typical "bottleneck" effect when too much volume is forced through a constructed area. The other contributing factor to current and future congestion problems is associated with the northwest/southeast configuration of the East Trail (US 41). Because this roadway converges with the east/west and north/south roadways at an angle it has the impact of forcing or "squeezing" the travel demand into the confined area of the Gordon River corridor. This one roadway serves both the north/south and the east/west travel demand in the East Naples area. Travelers at the southeastern corner of the Urban Area have only one route into the central City of Naples, i.e., the East Trail, whereas travelers in the northeast reaches of the Urban Area have a multitude of choices along the roadway grid for a route to downtown Naples. In developing plans for new and expanded roadways that make up the long range network, the County has kept in view these natural and man-made traffic circulation constraints. Even though environmental concerns are usually addressed through the permitting process, it is important to consider various highway alternatives in light of the sometimes fragile ecological features. 38 Words ctruckthrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions 8 B "'t (II) 4. Future Traffic Circulation Map - Year 2000 5. Future Traffic Circulation Map - Year 2010 6. Future Traffic Circulation Map - Year 2020 40 Words struckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined, are additions Wilson Bird t.I ° ~g~ County Rd 951 County Rd 951 m ~$ I ~/ Coun[y Barn $ ~ Go~ b~e-Frank Rd / ~.E~ ~.~ ,~l~,~.:.~: ' -' ~ " '~!~o'-~ -'' ~ ~ Tamiami T~,I N ~ '* "~* :']' ': ~Q-r (~ UJ Z o 0 S~L~e ~ 2e O0 43 Z uJ 0 O0~ u o~o 46 ::3 Z I-- W State Rd 29 ,;' Ewrglades Bird ~ ~ I0 C~ ,J ill ~' Vanderbilt Dr ~iCsho~a~ County Rd 951 ~ ~nt~ B~v~ .... .~ounty Barn P-~I~! ~" Bayshore Rd 49 BIKtFMAP NAPLES U.~BAN AREA 0.5 0 0.5 1 Miles E~'4E I~hES PAVED 3~ L~ ~ ~RSC~ GRRPHICS BT: B~ Yn~G LEE m-~ O,~Y J Green Bird 5O N 0.5 PA%~T~ D .T~HOULDERS ® IMMOKALEE ~Oelawar 51 N Ell KEG~FMA P MARCOIISLAND NSIDEWALKS PAV~ SHOUL~RS ~OUNT'f ~L ~,DARY ~OR ~RPORT ~JOR SCHOOLS 52 -8B EVERGLADES CITY n Pky N EVERGLADES CITY 0.5 0 0.5 Miles B~KE LANES NSIOEWALK. S PAVED SHOULDERS OFF-ROAD PATHWAY LOCAL ROADS ~ COUNTY BOUNDARY I ~ ~ MAJOR A,IRPORT MAJOR SCHOOLS r ;KEE 53 2020 IMMOKALEE Lake T~ra~f. ord Rd / 0.6 N LEGEND BiKE LANES /~SIDEWALKS GREENWAY ~ COUNTY BOUNDARY 0 0.6 Graphics by: Beth Yang 1.2 Miles Lake TraffQrd :~4 54 2020 NAPLES URBAN AREA BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES N LEGEND BIKE LANES ,/~SIDEW ALKS GREENWAY COUNTY BOUNDARY I 0 I 2 Mile~ Graphics by: ~, ~?0 B~th Yang y~ltlilt. Q~ach. . Rd ~ Gate:Bird W .0 55 LEGEND BIKE LANES /VSIDEWALKS 1~4AJOR ROADS ~,~-- ~ COUNTY BOUNDARY 0.5 0 0.5 1 Miles ~-.'i~'~C~_' Gral~iCs by: Ba~h Yang 56 2020 EVERGLADES CITY AREA BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES ,P!a.n.tat!o.n, P, ~kY ~' ~' / ~ I ~SIDEWALKS 57 LEGEND ;=*"a,,~* ~,e ROUTE I - RED ROUTE ~OR COU~ ROADS N~t~ W E 58 LEGEND N W* ~ ~ · ' INTERSTATE HIGi-IWAY PLACES OF INTEREST 59 Green Bird ~--'~- .... ~ ........ :1 1 ,- ................... ~J i ....... ~ ....... : ~ .. ! ~~ I II .-., ..... ~- ..... ~_~ _:_ ~" ~,,. ........ ~._~ I ....~. / 1 .... --- '-~ I i'--i ' J ..... L ~r- ~ ~ : ~ ~ .. lb - ..-'~'-&~te~ Ave ~ I- f ............ " !- - -' . _.. · /..~_ ..... i.._'~ . . _..- ..... . . _ ~ ..... ~ .~ ....... · ' ii-- --~:_.__.__ ...... -,~f. ~ ~.~ LEGEND ~ V~OH ~R . ~ ~mo~,'~=,~ ~ro ROUTfi 3- PURPLE ROUTE 60 LEGEND ~ 'NTERST^TE HIGHWAY .... WATER BODIES N 61 LEGEND ROL~TE 5 = BLUE ROUTE 62 rSB E. INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION 1. Non-Motorized Travel Today in Collier County, there exists the potential for an integrated network of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that would provide a safe, clean, healthy, and efficient opportunity for travel throughout the urban area. To help create a more balanced and livable transportation system, one that provides for bicycling and walking, Collier County has undertaken new roles and responsibilities not previously performed. The Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan, developed by the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff, was adopted by the MPO in December, 1994. The purpose of the Pathway Plan is to plan for the future needs of bicyclists, pedestrians and other non-motorized travel modes. The Plan is a tool to guide the MPO's Bicycle/Pedestrian Program within six essential areas: (1) establishment; (2) engineering; (3) education; (4) enforcement; (5) encouragement; and (6) economics. These interrelated areas address Collier County's non-motorized issues, constrains, needs and opportunities. The Pathway Plan is currently being implemented in Collier County. The Pathway Plan documents the extent of the existing pathway system. Many of the major - highways have sidewalks incorporated into their design. It is a policy of this plan that all future capacity improvements described in this plan shall include provisions for both bicycles and pedestrians. In addition, the Subdivision Regulations of Collier County provide for bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout a development. The 2020 Pathway Plan also provides for the systematic completion of an integrated system. It is a policy of this Plan that Collier County will annually adopt a 5 Year Pathway Work Program that establishes pathway priorities. The County, to the greatest extent possible, will identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathway Work Program. In addition to providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, the County will encourage their use, and promote safe bicycle and pedestrian practices through the continued support and implementation of the Comprehensive Pathway Plan. 2. Aviation under the a'~ct'c- 0f .u~..~ ~,,:~...~. Ccunt) .... ~ ............ . ~ ..................... , , ........ n.,~ ..... u ..... J ............ ;_.. ........ , ........... , ........... Airport Master Plans were prepared for the Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and the Marco Island Executive Airpom These plans provide insight as to existing facilities and conditions and make reco~endations regarding potential opportunities and necessary future facilities at the three airpoas. a. E~sting Facilities The development of separate master plans for Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and Marco Island Executive Airpoa required the collection and evaluation of information relative to each of the ai~orts and surrounding areas including the following: · Physical inventories and descriptions of facilities and services currently provided by each of the airports · Background information pertaining to aircraft fleet mix and historical activity levels · Regional plans and studies potentially affecting future airport development activity -70- 63 Words o* .... t~,}, ..... ~' are deletions -Words underlined are additions Immokalee Regional Airport: The airport is located on a 1,100 acre site in the north-central part of the County, approximately 40 miles northeast of Naples. Located on the northeast side of Immokalee, the airport is only one mile from the Central Business District. Primary access to the airport is via State Route 29 to County Route 846, which intersects with Airpark Boulevard to the south of the airport. Little development has occurred at the airport since its transfer of ownership in 1960 from the United States Government. Both landside and airside facilities are located at the airport. Landside facilities include the aircraft storage hangars, fueling facilities, etc. Airside facilities included at Immokalee are three runways, each 5,000 feet long and 150 feet wide. Taxiways are available as well. The airside facilities presently available provide for opportunities that are not available at other general aviation airports within the County. The three 5,000 foot runways and pavement strength provide operational capability exceeded only by Naples Municipal Airport. Additionally, only a portion of the 1,100 acres at the Immokalee Regional Airport is currently being used for airfield purposes. Large tracts of land remain available for future development of additional landside facilities and future economic development activity. Everglades Airpark: Everglades Airpark was initially purchased and developed by Collier County in 1968. The airport purchase was funded through monetary assistance provided by the Federal Aviation Administration, a National Park Grant, and Collier County. Little development has taken place since its opening, other than the required maintenance projects. Situated outside the boundaries of Everglades National Park and the Big Cypress National Preserve, the airport is surrounded on three sides by water. The airport is immediately surrounded by lands zoned as areas of environmental concern. Facilities at Everglades Airpark include a single runway that is 50 feet wide and 2,400 feet long, a taxiway, and runway lighting. Parking facilities, fueling and hangar facilities are also available. A terminal building/pilots lounge has been recently constructed, which provides a number of services. Marco Island Executive Airport: In the late 1960's, plans for a resort-oriented area south of Naples were conceived. Deltona, the developer of the Marco Shores project, determined that along with the upscale resort area, an airport was needed capable of accommodating small air carrier and general aviation aircraft. Construction of the airport began in 1972, and was completed in 1976. Through a land swap with the State of Florida, the County recently acquired the airport property in exchange for property within the Fakahatchee Strand. Existing airfield facilities include one runway, which is 5,000 feet long and 100 feet wide, a taxiway, various navigational aids, as well as airfield lighting. Automobile parking facilities are available adjacent to the terminal building. b. Future Potential Opportunities Immokalee Regional Airport: According to the Immokalee Regional Airport Master Plan, a number of factors support the notion that this airport could become a regional airline/aircraft maintenance base in the future. The length, width, and pavement strength of the existing airfield is capable of accommodating nearly all of the aircraft in the national regional airline fleet. There is ample open land available for future development of additional hangar space. The establishment of the airport in conjunction with the Southwest Florida International Airport as a Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) could provide some opportunities for expanded air cargo operations. The Immokalee Regional Airport can offer space for industrial development and -7~- 64 Words "* .... t.,~. ..... ~. ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions warehousing taking advantage of the FTZ. Such services could involve turbo-prop, business jet, or even smaller commercial jet activity. Additionally, the shipping of fresh produce from the airport may be a possibility. Considering the large agricultural base in the Immokalee area, specialty produce opportunities could be developed for movement by air to restaurants and retailers within the region, or nationally. The regional climate may offer an incentive as well for future flight training facilities. The weather in Southwest Florida is ideal for training operations. The airport has the land area available on site to support this type of operation and development of the necessary hangar and terminal facilities. Everglades Airpark: Land and environmental constraints at the Everglades Airpark provide little in the way of increased operations. The general intent of the Everglades Airpark Master Plan is demand-based rather than time-based. This means that reasonable levels of activity potential that are derived from this forecasting effort will be related to planning levels rather than dates in time. The demand levels, combined with airfield limitations suggest that the Airpark will continue to serve primarily single engine and twin-engine piston aircraft. The waters surrounding Everglades Airpark are currently utilized by seaplanes. The waters surrounding the Airpark provide a unique opportunity to increase seaplane operations, by providing daily sight-seeing flights and overnight excursions to coastal areas with campground facilities. Marco Island Executive Airport: According to the Marco Island Executive Airport Master Plan, Collier County Airport Authority should continue its efforts on operating the airport as an attractive, efficient, and safe facility. It was recommended that the Airport Authority continue to market and develop the airport as a facility to serve primarily corporate type aircraft indicative of the visitor and resident clientele of the Marco Island Area, and attract and maintain scheduled commuter service for the community. c. Estimated Development Timelines And Costs The development timelines and costs are included in the Master Plans for each of the airports. January 1998. The short term planning horizon covers items of highest priority as well as items that should be developed as the airport approaches the short term activity milestones. Priority items include improvements to safety and pavement maintenance. Also included, are improvements to facilities that are inadequate for present demand. Because of their priority, those items will need to be incorporated into County, State, and FAA programming. When short term horizon activity levels are reached, it will then be time to program for the intermediate term based upon the next activity milestones. Similarly, when the intermediate term milestones are reached, it will then be time to program for the long range. The cost estimates within each of the airport master plans were increased by 30% in order to allow for engineering and other contingencies that may be experienced by the project. -72 65 Words struokthrough are deletions -~J-ords underlined are additions (II) 3. Mass Transit a. Purpose Collier County ......... fixed route service for public transportation on February 15, 2001. Initiated deviated Private services offered in the County are fixed route "trolleys" which operate during the winter season in Naples and on Marco Island, and a network of para-transit providers that offer transportation services to the disadvantaged. The Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) program is coordinated by Collier County, which has been designated as the Coordinated Provider by the Naples Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The TD services offer home pick-up and delivery transportation for the elderly, handicapped, and economically disadvantaged in the County. The "trolley" systems mentioned above are run primarily for the tourist segment of the population and have fixed routes that visit the major shopping, beach and hotel interest points. b. Future System Needs On August 3, 1999 the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Public Transportation Development Plan (PTDP), and agreed to become the Governing Agency for Transit in Collier County. The PTDP contains estimates of un-met need in Collier County, both for the existing TD services, and for general public transportation. It contains planning level discussions on demand centers, route locations, vehicle sizes and types of services. private-o~,,~: .......... ,,.~,'~ ............. ~,,,.,~, ,.~ ,,,~' ......... ~,,,v. The Public Transportation Operating Plan (PTOP) was adopted by the MPO on December 8, 2000 and by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on January 9, 2001. It is hereby incorporated by reference. Other services proposed in the start up public transportation system are a vanpool program, circulator service in Immokalee, an Immokalee to Naples shuttle service, and a Commuter Assistance Program. Although the PTPD final report suggested the need for numerous public transportation services in Collier County, the scale and growth rate of the initial system was such that no local funding contribution was predicted to be required until fiscal year 2006. This situation is the result of gradual changes in the requirements for local matching funds that accompany state and federal grant funds. Collier County is already spending funds on public transportation that meet the match requirements. -74- 66 Words "+ .... ~'+~ ..... ~' ............. u,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions F. PERSPECTIVES 1. Land Use Issues The Transportation Element is closely related to the Future Land Use Element. It has long been the pattern that the development of land necessitates improvements and expansion to the transportation system. The two elements are so closely tied, in fact, that changes or shifts in the land use patterns can drastically impact the performance of the roadway system. It is for this reason that the County requires most land development proposals (e.g., DRI, rezone, and provisional use requests) to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. An analysis of the proposal's impact is prepared and submitted to the recommending and approving authorities. As an alternative to this pattern of demand driving the transportation system improvements, the County has begun to explore ways to have the roadway system guide the patterns and densities of development. The County can determine the type of roadway system it wishes to maintain at the adopted level of service and then take steps to permit the type of land uses that will be consistent with that system. In this way, the County will be in a better position to keep the demand for transportation services from outstripping the supply of the roadway system. The County has also recognized the importance of good site planning as it relates to a projects ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Inadequate control of access points, median openings and signalized intersections can accelerate the deterioration of the systems overall level of service just as fast as the increases in traffic volumes. The County has developed and adopted policies to control the number, location and type of access points to the road network. These policies are based on the Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution No. 92-42) and follow-up Resolution No. 01-246, and existing road and land use conditions. An access management plan map exists for each mixed-use activity center. The purpose of the access management plans is to minimize the adverse impacts to safety, capacity and operating conditions of the roadways, while providing adequate access to those properties. Access points on state controlled roads are subject to approval by the Florida Department of Transportation. 2. Marco Island Airport Impacts The Marco Island Airport, located east of SR-951 approximately 4.5 miles south of US 41 is a facility having a runway length of approximately 5,000 feet. Access to the facility is from SR-951 via Mainsail Drive. The facility currently provides only general aviation services to the southern urban area. Adjacent to the air strip is the Marco Shores Golf Club Community consisting of a golf course and a phase one residential area of 240 condominium units. All other lands surrounding the facility are under State ownership and are environmentally sensitive. Peak season-peak hour traffic counts taken in 1988 at the intersection of Mainsail Drive at SR-951 reveal 120 vehicles using Mainsail Drive during the period of 8:00a.m. and 10:00a.m. This count would include both residential and airport generated traffic. A 1985 analysis of Marco Island Airport operation is part of the Continuing Florida Aviation System Plan indicates the following current conditions: In 1994, Marco Island Airport had approximately 30 based aircraft with 15,000 annual general aviation operations. By 2005, the facility is expected to have 35 based aircraft and 21,000 annual operations. The airport has been served by regional airlines in the past. If commercial commuter -7-6- 67 Words "* .... u,~, ..... ~ ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions 813 ' service was ever resumed it could be expected to generate an additional 8,000 operations per year by 2005. The current limited use of this publicly owned facility places no significant impact on SR-951. 3. Inter-agency Coordination Cooperation In Collier County, the responsibility for providing transportation facilities rests with several different agencies. Long-range transportation planning is the primary charge of the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO is made up of le~cal ~1 .... a e`fficials ~-'~ is charged r,,, r:~,~l n,a e .... ~ ..... * ..... ~; .....~ tran~pc~ati~n ~:~ activities ~' p~n:~, County. staff is housed in the Transpo~ation Services Division, Transportation Planning Depanment. The Collier County Transportation Planning Depanment provides staff services to the MPO. The MPO coordinates its planning activities with the City, County, and State Depaament of Transpo~ation. The programming and construction activities are handled by the City of Naples, City of Marco Island, Collier County, and the Florida Department of Transportation. Each agency's construction programs are monitored by the MPO to ensure inter-agency consistency. 4. Funding of Roadway Improvements In Collier County the pursuit of additional funding for roadway improvements has led to the implementation of numerous funding alternatives. The County has adopted the maximum allowable ~ local option gas taxe_ss in addition to a one-cent voted gas tax. Impact fees for roadway construction were initiated in 1985 and up-dated in !992 2000, and 2002. Municipal Service Taxing Units have been used to implement area specific projects. On the State level, local governments through the Metropolitan Planning Organization have directed their attention to the under-funded State roads in Collier County. One of the MPO's roles is to ensure that local governments in its jurisdiction r-eee4-ve direct equitable tre`atmcnt within the. FD©T District state and federal funding to the highest priority projects. -7-?- 68 Words struckthrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions As part of the Transportation Element, the County established m/i,fiimum acceptable level of service standards on the existl, n.g,,high,~,a,y system. For most Coun~y'facilities, the level of service standard to be maintained is 'D o__L E-- as measured on a F1Citl~3~eak hour basis. Several County and State facilities have been given a minimum LOS "E" standard. To maintain the adopted LOS on roadways, the County has implemented a concurrency management regulatory program that ties issuance of development orders to the demonstration of adequate capacity on all roadway segments that would be significantly impacted by new development. In summary this program maintains an inventory of the following for each arterial and collector roadway segment: · Actual traffic on each segment as determined through an annual traffic counting program, · The peak hour service capacity as determined by engineering analyses performed by the Transportation Department, and · Capacity that will be used by new development for which a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities has been issued. In order to prevent sudden unanticipated LOS failures, the County will adopt, within one year or sooner, a "real time .... checkbook accounting" concurrency management process. The process accomplishes this by use of a matrix that evaluates the amount of traffic any development requests to add to a roadway segment based on the relationship between the segment's available capacity and the time improvements to that segment are scheduled in the five year Capital Improvement Program. As existing and permitted traffic on a roadway segment consumes greater than 75% of the segment's service capacity, the amount of new traffic permitted by new development assigned to it each year is limited in relationship with remaining segment capacity and the year construction of an improvement is in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. Application of the matrix results in metering of project traffic added to each segment once volumes of existing and permitted traffic approach capacity such that by the time a segment reaches capacity, an improvement is under construction. See the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Section 3.15 of the Land Development Code) for details of this process. gg- 69 Words -'+ ...."*~- ..... ~' ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions ~^ ' ' ~ ~" ~*"'~*; ~" ' *~'~ affords ' In addition ,. prey:al:rig a .~ ............. per:ad .....two :,'ears the oppoaun:ty burden off of the LOS "E" roadway. standards policy of the Transportation Element. 1. Monitoring Section 3.15 of the Land Development Code is also known as the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO). It describes the annual count program done on County roads to determine their annual average daily traffic (AADT). It describes how the relationship between that AADT and the segment's adopted level of service (LOS) standard determines the road segment's level of service. The current levels of service at which road segments are operating are reported annually in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). This report indicates which segments are operating at levels of service worse than their adopted standard LOS. It also contains predictions of when certain segments will reach levels of service that exceed their adopted standard LOS. Although traffic volumes are expressed as AADT, LOS calculations are done to ensure adequate levels of service, during peak Peak season, peak hour traffic conditions are skewed in Collier County because of the heavy influx of seasonal residents and tourists. As such, it is deemed an inappropriate and unreasonable imposition on tax payers to provide a roadway system designed for the peak of the peak season. Therefore, the LOS calculations are based on traffic conditions experienced for 10 months of the year with the peak seasonal and tourist months of February and March omitted from the analysis. 2. LOS Determination And BCC Findings The annual average daily volumes will be calculated and the peak hour volume interpreted based upon the available data consistent with omitting February and March tourist months from the analysis. The Transportation ~ Division shall pre~arc a maintain and update a list of all roadway segments, for which a level of service standard has been adopted, that shows the current LOS ~ 4 ..... :.~ ..... / as well as the adopted LOS standard found in this plan. m~;~ 1;~+ :~ ~,-I- ~-I.,~ ATT'rD 70-70 Words °* .... t,,~, ..... ~, ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions =~, .... ;.g ,. ......... ;~. ^4o ~. .... a ...... ~;~ If the volume of traffic of any segments m:e is found to exceed their its adopted LOS, a report of the Depm:tmem:s Division's findings ~v,,~,,,,,,~;-- ..~" of the County's .v.~o-^~ao will be transmitted to the Board of County Commissioners. The APFO describes the consequences of a road segment operating at a LOS that exceeds its adopted LOS standard. 2.1 Constrained Roadways Constrained facilities are roadways which have been designated by action of the Board of County Commissioners once it has been determined that they the facility will not be expanded by two or more through lanes due to physical, environmental or policy constraints. Physical constraints primarily occur when a roadway is developed to the maximum six lane standard or when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to roads, thus making expansion cost prohibitive. Environmental and policy constraints primarily occur when decisions are made not to expand a road based on environmental, historical, archaeological, aesthetic or social impact considerations. Constrained roadways are identified by action of the BCC upon the recommendation of the Transportation Administrator. Roadways identified as constrained shall be subject to growth restrictions such that further LOS degradation does not occur once the roadway is determined to be operating below Level-of- Service standard. Constrained roadways are subject to growth restrictions that only allow for an increase in annual daily traffic volume of 10% above the service volume at Level-of-Service standard resulting in LOS operations not to exceed 110% of service volume. Roadways operating at maximum six lane standards can be considered constrained when the facilities exceed 75% capacity. If the service volume exceeds 110%, deminimis growth would be applied to the roadway segment. 2.2 Backlogged Roadways Backlogged facilities are roadways or segments that are not constrained, they either exceed capacity, or are operating above 75% of the roadway's service capacity without the needed improvement programmed within the year required in the five year Schedule of Capital Improvements as identified in the matrix and process found in the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Section 315 of the Land Development Code). Backlogged roadways are subject to 5% or 10% growth restrictions annually based on the percentage of capacity available and when the construction phase to add capacity is programmed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. Words °+ .... t.+~, ..... ~, ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions -88 ......... x ..... a ~ ................................... FOa~ ;vaj'. .................................... ~ ......... tyFc; of facilid~; are freeway~/ex~re~':,'ays, pdnc c .......... ~ncr ................................. ~ .......... j ' of influcncc areas ma/,' occur. Thc Transportation Department ':,'ill identify these influence arca; 4t~- 72 Words struckthrou;h are deletions -Words underlined are additions GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 8B (II) (II) GOAL 1: TO PLAN FOR, DEVELOP AND OPERATE A SAFE, EFFICIENT, AND COST EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES FOR BOTH THE MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT COLLIER COUNTY. OBJECTIVE 1: The County will maintain the major roadway system~,~....,~.~..~r~'"~;-~ ~...~e .... .-&-t':~u ....... .,..~ o~ at an acceptable Level of Service by implementing improvements as identified in the annual AUIR or by working directly with other responsible jurisdictions to implement needed improvements to their facilities. Policy 1.1: The County will annually adopt a schedule of Capital Improvements an Annual Update and ~ .......... r~ .....r ^ ~**r~x covering a period no less than five (5) years, which shall include those projects needed to maintain the network at the adopted Level of Service standard. Policy 1.2: The County shall annually appropriate the funds in the ensuing fiscal year to accommodate those phases of projects listed in the first year of the schedule of Capital Improvements Annual Update ~,~ ~ .......... o .... ~ ^ ~ xm~ All Programming decisions are based on the AUIR, and annually incorporated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in the CIE. Policy 1.3: County arterial and collector roads as well as State highways not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) shall be maintained at Level of Service "D" or better as addressed in paragraph G-1 of the Transportation Element on +~'~ ~,~o;o ^r .. .... , ....... peak u .......C~B volume except: Level of Service "E" or better shall be maintained on the following designated roadways. Roadway Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road US 41 From To Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Airport-Pulling Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway to US 41 ^; .... + ~' '";'""' Road US 41 to '-75 Lo.qan Blvd. Collier Boulevard to Old US 41 Airport-Pulling Road Airport-Pulling Road Davis Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway US 41 to Golden Gate Parkway Pine Ridqe Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Airport-Pulling Road US 41 to Airport-Pulling Road -8-2- 73 Words o* .... b,k ..... ~, ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions (II) Livin,qston Road Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Gulfshore Drive Level of Service "D" or better shall be maintained on all other county and state arterial and collector roads. ~' ......... , an;,' ~=~4~" ^c .^..~ may cpcratc -* T .... ' ~c S .... ~ "~:" ~" a -~.;~a .~, The r,~,,;~, r, ....... ~on Collier County Transportation Division shall determine ~ T ,~c ~ ..... ~. ..... , ..... a ...... · *~: .... :. ~ 4~_~ ~ ............. ~,., :a~-,:n,:-- the traffic volumes that co~espond to the different LOS thresholds on county roads., and mere accaratcly Transpo~ation Division shah install, as funds permit, permanent traffic count stations to better identify traffic characteristics of county roads. The Transpo~ation Division shall develop the Capital Improvement Program of the C~ to be consistent with the findings to the maximum extent financially feasible. Policy 1.4: of service standard~ for state maintained roads: Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for State Roads with the exception of those on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS). In Collier County FDOT sets the LOS standards for 1-75. The standards for 1-75 are as follows: Existing Rural Area Urbanized Area Transitioning Urbanized Area Thc acgmcn: cf US ~. ! f:'cm ' ~ H' ,) ~ /-o 7~ l) :c ""'""**"'"' H.::::mcck P. cad (CP. ,°.5~) and thc ,,.= ....... ..,- p. a., (!x!c ..... ... :'.cad) '"'~ Fl-.:',',' York ~3- 74 Words ctruckthrou;h are deletions - Words underlined are additions 8B (II) OBJECTIVE 2: The County will maintain the adopted Level of Service standard as provided for in Policy 1.3 by making the improvements identified on the Five (5) Year Work Program. Policy 2.1: The County shall include in its Schedule of Capital Improvements in the Capital Improvement Element those projects necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service on the roads identified on the Five (5) Year Work Program. Policy 2.2: The County shall annually appropriate the funds necessary to implement those projects shown in the annual element (first year) of the schedule of Capital Improvements Annua! Update and , D~*q- lA TTTD\ Inventor3 ~-~w, (II) OBJECTIVE 3: The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future right-of-ways. Policy 3.1: The County has implemented an advanced Right-of-Way Preservation and Acquisition Program. Policy 3.2: The County includes in its annual Capital Improvement Element na.~ool .... ..~..~-~- ,~,~.~,,~v,~¢qnn naa w' ........ ~=' funding specifically earmarked for use in an advanced Right-of-Way Acquisition Program. ~ ~;~ a ~tudyies shall be conducted periodically to identify the long range right-of way needs of the transportation system based on buildout. Following ~ their, completion, of thi: :tudy, *~ ~"-~: ....... ;~ ..... ~ .... n~ ............... ~ .... n .... ~ County's ...... ~ need.the Transportation Ad~nistrator will present a program of funding in actions to protect and acquire needed right-of-way· Policy 3.3: Use Element Palicy 4.2 and Transpcxatian Element Palicy 7.4) . The County shah acquire sufficient amount of right-of-way to facilitate no less than a cross section of (6) traffic lanes, appropriate turn lanes, medians, bicycle and pedestrian features, drainage canals, and shoulder sufficient for pull offs and landscaping areas. Exceptions to the right-of-way standard may be considered when it can be demonstrated, through a traffic capacity analysis, that the maximum number of lanes at build-out will be less than the standard. Policy 3.4: Collier County shall acquire rights-of-way for transportation improvements in fee simple, unless otherwise determined appropriate by the BCC based upon recommendation of the Transportation Administrator. OBJECTIVE 4: 84- 75 Words "* .... ~-*~' ..... ~' ............. u,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) (II) The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, and motorized and non-motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan. Policy 4.1: The County shall, incorporate the Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan by reference and update the Plan as needed. Policy 4.2: The County shall provide for support services, and resources and staff within the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization to coordinate the Bicycle/Pedestrian Program. Policy 4.3: The County shall provide an interconnected and continuous bicycle and pedestrian system by making the improvements identified on the 2020 Pathway Facilities Map series as funds permit. The County's pathway construction program should be consistent with the Comprehensive Pathway Plan. The Pathway Advisory Committee should prcv:,de shall, to the maximum extent feasible, provide recommendations on the choice of projects to be included in the pathway construction program, and the order in which they are constructed. Policy 4.4: The County shall annually adopt a 5 Year Pathway Work Program which establishes pathway priorities to retrofit existing streets to accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. Policy 4.5: The County shall, to the greatest extent possible, identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathway Work Program. Policy 4.6: The County shall provide for the safe movement of motorized vehicles through implementation of its Land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances and shall incorporate both bike lanes, and sidewalks and pathways as deemed appropriate in new construction and reconstruction of roadways. Policy 4.7: The County shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically possible and will not result in a safety or operational problem. Policy 4.8: The County shall follow the most current bicycle and pedestrian facilities design and construction standards developed by the Florida Department of Transportation to the extent which is physically and safely possible. OBJECTIVE 5: The County will coordinate the Transportation System develOpment process with the Future Land Use Map. Policy 5.1: The County Commission will review all rezone requests with consideration of their impact on the overall system, and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway -8-5 76 Words "'* ....t,,k ..... ~, ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) 8B segment already operating and/or projected to operate ve~*hi~h'~e-5~ at an unacceptable Level of Service unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. Policy 5.2: Significant Impact is hereby defined as generating a volume of traffic equal to or greater than 5% 1% of the adopted m/n~mum standard love! of service peak hour service volume of an impacted deficient roadway. OBJECTIVE 6: The County shall coordinate the Transportation Element with the plans and programs of the State, Region, and other local jurisdictions. (II) (II) Policy 6.1: The Transportation Element shall incorporate to the greatest degree possible, the long range plans of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization. Policy 6.2: The Transportation Element shall consider any and all applicable roadway plans of the City of Naples, City of Marco Island, Florida Department of Transportation, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and Lee County. Policy 6.3: The Transportation Element shall be consistent in its interface into the arterial/collector system within the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island. Policy 6.4: The Transportation Element shall consider the State's adopted Five (5) Year Work Program, the Florida Transportation Plan, and the State Land Development Plan. Policy 6.5 The Collier County MPO's adopted Long Range Plan has identified a need for an interchange at 1-75 and Golden Gate Parkway and a grade separated overpass at Airport Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway. A,, Interchange T .... :c:.,,;~- D..... I~11~. ........ a by '*'~ Florida OBJECTIVE 7: The County shall develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, as well as encourage safe and convenient on-site traffic circulation. Policy 7.1: protection of thc afferial and collector system's capacity. Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as may be amended to ensure the protection of the a~erial and collector system's capacity and integrity. Policy 7.2: _815 77 Words "'+ ....~-*~ ..... ~- - ............. ~,, are deletions Wbrds underlined are additions The County shall require the submission of a neighborhood traffic impact assessment as a part of all rezone and conditional use applications. This study will analyze the proposed project's impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. Policy 7.3: The County shall implement, through its Zoning Ordinance, the provision of safe and convenient on-site traffic flow and the need for adequate parking for motorized and non-motorized vehicles as a primary objective in review for Planned Unit Developments, Site Development Plans, and other appropriate stages of review in the land development applications process. Policy 7.4: The County shall develop corridor management plans~o~t .... L,~ ~r:~,~ ~,,oT ~.`4 T~o~o~ ~,~-,~-vr:~ ..... ~ that take into consideration urban design and landscaping measures that will promote positive development along the major arterial entrances to the urban area. Such plans shall take into account the Community Character Plan and the initiatives of Smart Growth as the Board of County Commissioners may annually appropriate funding for these plans. Policy 7.5 .......... J .... v ................. 6 gcnrcez. The County shall develop Corridor Access Management Plans. Such plans shall be designed to make median modifications and other operational improvements, including removal of traffic signals, necessary to recapture lost capacity and enhance safety. OBJECTIVE 8: The County shall establish and maintain a "Concurrency Management System" for the scheduling, funding, and timely construction of necessary road facilities. Policy 8.1 Each year, the county will use short term projections of previous years' traffic volume growth to estimate the year in which LOS deficiencies will occur on county roads. This information will be used to prepare the annual update of the county's schedule of Capital Improvements Capital T .......... ,,- -c~ .... ,- c ..... ,-'~ in a manner that ensures the maintenance of concurrency on road facilities. Policy 8.2 Pursuant to Chapter 163.3180 F.S., and in accordance with the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Land Development Code Section 3.15), development proposals shall be required to submit traffic impact analyses..ua ~ .... ~ ~c `4~;, ~c ,.a~;~u oU~,~ t.~ `4~,~;.~`4 ~.., .u~ ........................ ~o s .......... J .......... v ........ The methodology for preparing acceptable traffic impact analyses is found in the Collier County Traffic Concurrency Analysis Policy and Procedures Manual. OBJECTIVE 9: The County shall encourage neighborhood involvement and safe and pleasant conditions for the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists on neighborhood streets, not classified as arterials or collectors through the implementation of the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). 87- 78 Words struckthrough are deletions - Words underlined are additions Policy 9.1 The County shall incorporate the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program by reference and update as needed. Policy 9.2 The County shall provide for support services, resources and staff to coordinate the Program. Policy 9.3 The County shall cnccurage require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate the convenient movement throughout the local road network. Policy 9.4 The County shall define on a project by project basis, the acceptable amount of rerouted traffic as a result of a traffic management project Policy 9.5 The County shall route through traffic to the major roadways designated in the Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Policy 9.6 The County shall neighborhoods. review impacts on emergency vehicle access or response time to Policy 9.7 Roadways ,;~a in Appendix ^ ,,r,^~ ....... ................ ;o in Collier Ccunty not Considered Local Facil~tics" ....... ~4_:~.~ ~.~ .~.~ ~.rm~D identified as collector or arterial facilities are not eligible for the NTMP. Policy 9.8 The County shall employ consider a variety of traffic calming devices to achieve the NTMP'S objectives for a project. Such traffic calming devices shall be planned and designed in conformance with sound engineering and planning practices. Primary funding for such plans shall come from the local funding initiatives such as MSTUs or MSTBUs for the area to benefit from the traffic calming. Policy 9.9 To implement the NTMP, certain procedures shall be followed in processing neighborhood traffic management requests in accordance with applicable codes and related policies and within the limits of available resources. At a minimum, the procedures shall provide for: submittal of project proposals; evaluation of proposals by staff; citizen participation in plan development and evaluation; methods of temporarily testing traffic management plans when needed; communication of any test results and specific findings to area residents and affected neighborhood organizations before installation of permanent traffic calming devices; and appropriate County Commission review. · --88 79 Words struckthrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) 8B OBJECTIVE 10 The County shall encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public. Policy 10.1 The County shall develop a program to examine the maintenance and operational needs of the rural roadway system. This program will address the mobility needs of the rural resident to include the availability of roads for rural-to-urban travel, as well as for hurricane evacuation purposes. Policy 10.2 The County shall continue to improve transit services for the Transportation Disadvantaged in the rural areas through the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC). Policy 10.3 The County shall incorporate herein by reference the Corridor Management Plan for the Tamiami Trail Scenic Highway, which formed part of the application for Scenic Highway designation authorized by the Board of County Commissioners on November 3, 1998. OBJECTIVE 11 The County shall maintain County owned airport facilities as attractive, efficient, safe, and environmentally compatible facilities Policy 11.1 The County shall incorporate by reference the Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and Marco Island Executive Airport Master Plans. Policy 11.2 The Collier County Airport Authority shall determine the most cost effective and efficient means for implementing future facility plans outlined within the airport master plans. (II) (II) (II) OBJECTIVE 12: The County shall encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future. Policy 12.1: The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization, through the Transportation Disadvantaged Program shall assist the local community transportation coordinator in the implementation of the most efficient and effective level of service possible for the transportation disadvantaged. Policy 12.2: The County shall coordinate the development and maintenance of transit development plans with the r,~,;~. Count)' ~'~ ......':*"- ' ' ' .............. v ....... Planmng ©rgan:zat:on Collier County Transportation Division and the Florida Department of Transportation. Policy 12.3 Collier County Metrcpclitan Planning v,6 ............................... v,~,,o.~'° shall be the managing authority_ of the Collier Area Transit (CAT) system. ~- 80 Words o* .... ~'*~ ..... ~ ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) Policy 12.4: The County shall, in recognition that the potential for public transit service between Bonita Springs in Lee County and Naples exists, consider any intergovernmental efforts necessary. Policy 12.5: The County shall participate in the MPO planning process through an interlocal agreement with the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island, and in a Joint Participation Agreement with the FDOT. Policy 12.6: The County will participate in the MPO planning process ~'wv ~v~._;~ ............ Advigcry r~omm~L,.,~. ~ to ~.~ .......... ~r~r~ as a voting presence on the MPO Board and its' Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). (II) Policy 12.7: Following the adoption of any transit development plan, the County shall initiate the development of transit right-of-way and corridor protection strategies, including ordinances and policy additions. Policy 12.8: Any adopted transit development plan shall include an acceptable level of service standard for transit facilities. Policy 12.9 The County shall include capital expenditures for any adopted transit development plan in the Capital Improvement Element. Policy 12.10 The County shall incorporate herein by reference the most recent Public Transportation Development Plan and Public Transit Operating Plan adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. on August Words °+ .... t.+k ..... ~, ............. u,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Prepared By Collier County Planning Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Symbol Date Amended Ordinance No. ** May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-25 *** May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-26 (I) May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-27 (11) May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-30 (111) May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-33 (IV) December 12, 2000 Ordinance No. 2000-87 **** March 13, 2001 Ordinance No. 2001-11 (V) March 13, 2001 Ordinance No. 2001-12 Ordinance No. 2000-25, rescinded and repealed in its entirety Collier County Ordinance No. 99-63, which had the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM). Ordinance No. 2000-26, amended Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan, having the effect of rescinding certain EAR-based objectives and policies at issue in Administration Commission Case No. ACC-99-02 (DOAH Case No. 98-0324GM), more specifically portions of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element (Ord. No. 98-56), Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element (Ord. No. 97-59) and Drainage (Ord. No. 97-61) sub-elements of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element (Ord. No. 97-63), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (Ord. No. 97-64), Conservation and Coastal Management Element (Ord. No. 97-66), and the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map (Ord. No. 97-67); and re-adopts Policy 2.2.3 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Indicates adopted portions Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. **** Scrivener's Ordinance correcting omissions on Flue Map (V) = Plan Amendment CP-2000-3,4,5,7 & 11 by Ordinance No. 2001-12 on March 13, 2001 (IV) Policy 1.3: 8~ The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts: as described in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Policy 1.4: The CONSERVATION Future Land Use Designation shall include a Future Land Use District. Policy 1.5: Overlays and Special Features shall include: A. Area of Critical State Concern Overlay B. Areas of Environmental Concern Overlay C. Airport Noise Area Overlay D. Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay OBJECTIVE 2: The coordination of land uses with the availability of public facilities shall be accomplished through the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvements Element and implemented through the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance of the Land Development Code. Policy 2.1: The County shall prepare annually the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities which shall include a determination of the existing conditions of capital public facilities, determine the remaining available capacity, forecast future needs in the five year capital improvement schedule and identify needed improvements and funding to maintain the level of service adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of the Capital Improvements Element. Policy 2,2: Deficiencies or potential deficiencies that have been determined through the Annual Update and Inventory Report on capital public facilities may include the following remedial actions: ~ ..... ~ significant ~"~"e""" ~ ..... '~o add projects to the Capital Improvements Element or defer development until improvements can be made; or amend the level of service is-amer:~ to ensure available capacity. Policy 2.3: Continue the Certificate of Adequate Public Facility Adequacw regulatory program, which requires the certification of public facility availability prior to the issuance of a final local development order. OBJECTIVE 3: Land Development Regulations have been adopted to implement this Growth Management Plan pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S. in order to ensure protection of natural and historic resources, the availability of land for utility facilities, promote compatible land uses within the airport noise zone, and to provide for management of growth in an efficient and effective manner. Policy 3.1: Land Development Regulations have been adopted into the Land Development Code that contain provisions to implement the Growth Management Plan through the development review process and include the following provisions: a. The Collier County Subdivision Code shall provide for procedures and standards for the orderly development and subdivision of real estate in order to ensure proper legal description, identification, documentation and recording of real estate boundaries and adequate infrastructure for development. 11 Words strucl:thrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions October 31, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re~ Notice of Public Hearing to Consider an amendment to Ordinance 89-05, as Amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced notice and map on Friday, November 8, 2002, and again, on Wednesday, November 13, 2002. This advertisement should be no less than one-quarter page and the headline in the advertisement should be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement should not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, l~lie Hoffman Deputy Clerk Enclosure Account lll-138317-649110 Teri Michaels To: Subject: paperrell@naplesnews.com GROW.TH MGT DISPLAY 8B thx para! Growth ~nagement Display.c Growth ~nagement Display.c FAX TO: Pam Perrell LOCATION: Naples Daily News FAX NO: (941) 263-4703 COMMENTS: FROM: LOCATION: Please advertise as indicated COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE FAX NO: PHONE NO: DATE SENT: TIME SENT: # OF PAGES: (941) 774-8408 (941) 774- ~q Teri Michaels From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Monday, November 04, 2002 8:31 AM Teri Michaels Delivered: GROWTH MGT DISPLAY 8B GROWTH MGT DISPLAY <<GROWTH MGT D~ISPLAY>> Your message To: paperrell~naplesnews.com Subject: GROWTH MGT bi;SPLAY .Sent: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 08:35:19 -0500 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Mort, 4 Nov 2002 08:31:09 -0500 99706357 BCC 3xll nov 8 BCC/BT ZALLC.~L 78 17:32:14 11112/02 B PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, November 19, 2002 in the County Commissioners Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Buildir~, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida the Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing to consider the adoption of the following County Ordinance, Amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The Title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 02- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, AND THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The purpose of the hearing is to consider the Adoption of the Future Land Uso Element, Capital In~rovement Element and Transportation Element to the Growth Man, age~'nent Plan in response to the Objections, Comments and Recommendations Report of the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), according to the Procedures and Criteria outlined in Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendments are available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, 4th Floor, Administration Building, County Govemment Center, East Naples, Florida; arid at Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Ddve, Naples, Ftorida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Any questions pertaining to theso documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to November 19, 2002, will be read a~l considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceedirG, and for such purposo he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ~ JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By:/s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk No. 99706357 Novembe~ 8~ 13r 8B NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daily Naples, FL 34102 8 ~ ORDINANCE NO. 02- 6 o AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, AND THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABIL1TY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et.seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans pursuant to Sections 163.3184 and 163.3187; Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Collier County did submit this Growth Management Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs for preliminary review on July 3, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Affairs did review and issue its Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report (ORC) to the Capital Improvement Element and Transportation Element amendments to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted the same in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 60 days from receipt of this ORC Report from the Department of Community Affairs, to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the Capital Improvement Element, and the Transportation Element amendments to the Growth Management Plan on November 19, 2002; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of these amendments to the Capital Improvement Element and the Transportation Element, including the following: the Collier County staff report; and the other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meetings of the Collier County Planning Commission held November 7, 2002, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on November 19, 2002; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. Words Underlined are added; Words o*~'~-*~- ..... h ............. ~,, are deletions I rSB NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, AND TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts these amendments to the Capital Improvement Element and the Transportation Element in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The amendments are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of these amendments shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendments in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders or development permits dependent on these amendments may be issued or land uses dependent on these amendments commence before they have become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, these amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status. A copy of which Resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd., 3rd Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the County Commissioners of Collier County this day of ,~J 00gtv'X_h ~ , 2002. D W I~i~.~1~1~~:1~. rk ~~__~_.,,z' '4, I~, :,.,~/, :::. : g ,'". S ur , 5 al sufficiency: Mar)ori~}M. Student, Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY GOMMISSIONERS COLLIE~ BY: //"'"- ' -" -'- -~-' JAM~ N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Words Underlined are added; Words o,~_,.t...,4. ..... ~- are deletions 2 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Prepared By Collier County Planning Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT SYMBOL DATE AMENDED (I) February 23, 1999 (11) May 9, 2000 ORDINANCE NO. Ordinance No. 99-14 Ordinance No. 2000-31 Indicates adopted portion Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. Words ~'* ....~'*~' ..... ~' are deletions - Words underlined are additions * III. IV. V. VI. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: Roads Projects Drainage Projects EMS Projects Jail Projects Library Buildings Projects Library Collection Government Buildings Projects Parks Projects Water Projects Sewer Projects Landfill Projects COST AND REVENUES PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION ANALYSIS (Support Documents) Public Facility Requirements Capital Improvements Projects Capital Improvement Financing Capacity Collier County School Board Capital Improvement Program Timing & Location of Capital Improvements: Current Local Practices Financing Plan Collier County Fifth Annual Update & Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities Adopted portions Pa.qe CIE- 1 CIE - 2 CIE - 17 CIE - 26 CIE - 27 CIE - 29 CIE - 30 CIE - 31 CIE - 32 CIE - 33 CIE - 36 CIE - 42 CIE - 46 CIE - 47 CIE - 49 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G ± Words str,--'c!-.thrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions 8B I. INTRODUCTION In 1985 and 1986 the Florida Legisleture significantly strengthened the requirements for county end city comprehensive plens. One of the provisions of the Locel Government Comprehensive Plenning end Lend Development Reguletion Act is the requirement thet the comprehensive plan must contein e Cepitel Improvement Element to "... consider the needs for end Iocetion of public fecilities ..." (Section 163.3177(3), Florida Stetutes). ' The Cepitel Improvement Element (CIE) must identify public fecilities that will be required during the next five years, including the cost of the fecilities, end the sources of revenue thet will be used to fund the fecilities. One of the specific requirements of the legisletion states thet the public fecilities thet are contained in the CIE must be besed on "stenderds to ensure the availability of public fecilities and the adequacy of those fecilities including accepteble levels of service." The edministretive regulation thet implements the stetutes defines the phrase "level of service" es "... an indicetor of the extent or degree of service provided by ... a fecilit¥ based on end releted to the operational charecteristics of the fecility. Level of service shall indicete the cepecity per unit of demend for eech public facility." (Section 9J-5.003 (41), Florida Administretive Code). CIE- 1 Words str'-.'c~thrc'Jgh are deletions -Words underlined are additions GOAL 1: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT. GOALS~ OBJECTIVES AND POLIClEt5 TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CONCURRENT WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN OR EXCEED ADOPTED STANDARDS FOR LEVELS OF SERVICE. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Identify and define types of public facilities for which the County is responsible, establish standards for levels of service for each such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities are needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. Policy 1.1.1: The County shall establish standards for levels of service for three two categories of public facilities, as follows: Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in other elements of this comprehensive plan, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities. The standards for levels of service of Category A County provided public facilities shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the County's annual budget, and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan. The standards for levels of service of Category A facilities which are not County provided shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan, but shall not apply to the County's annual budget. Category B public facilities are facilities for the County's library, jail, and emergency medical services, "*~' ............ * bu!!d!ngc, ""'" '" .... ,~..,,+ ~;-,, ,~;,-*-;,-*~ The standards for levels of service of Category B public facilities shall apply to the County's annual budget, but not apply to development orders issued by the County. ..... r- .....................r' ...... r- .... , ....+~'" County's ...... ~ ~'' "~g"* Public facilities shall include land, structures, the initial furnishings and equipment (including ambulances, fire apparatus, and library collection materials), design, permitting, and construction costs. Other "capital" costs, such as motor vehicles and motorized equipment, computers and office equipment, office furnishings, and small tools are considered in the County's annual budget, but such items are not "public facilities" for the purposes of the Growth Management Plan, or the issuance of development orders. CIE- 2 Words st~ are deletions - Words underlined are additions 8B Policy 1.1.2: The quantity of public facilities that is needed to eliminate existing deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall be determined for each public facility by the following calculation: Q = (S x D)- I. Where (11) B. (11) Do (11) Q is the quantity of public facility needed, S is the standard for level of service, D is the demand, such as the population, and I is the inventory of existing facilities. The calculation will be used for existing demand in order to determine existing deficiencies. The calculation will be used for projected demand in order to determine needs of future growth. The estimates of projected demand will account for demand that is likely to occur from previously issued development orders as well as future growth. The County Commission will review all rezone requests and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall County-Wide density or intensity of permissible development with consideration of their impact on both the variable "D" in the formula Q = (S x D) - I, and the overall roadway system. The County Commission shall not approve any such rezone request or FLUE amendment that significantly impacts either: (1) a deficient roadway segment ..l~,...,~ ....... ,I .... ,~ ..... I,-,-*,-'~ * ...... *" ,.,~,~... .......... , ......... +..~.~.. ~ .... , ,.~ o...,,~,.~, or; (2) the BEBR high range growth rate population projections through the year 2000 2006, and then the BEBR medium range growth rate thereafter, for the variable "D", unless one er--mer-e of the following simultaneously occurs: 1. Specific mitigating stipulations are approved in conjunction with the rezone to restore or maintain the Level of Service on the impacted roadway segment; 2. The adopted population standard used for calculation of "Q" in the formula Q = (S x D) - I is amended based on appropriate data and analysis; 3. The Schedule of Capital Improvements is updated to include any necessary projects that would support the additional public facility demand(s) created by the rezone or amendment to the Future Land Use Element. Significant impact is hereby defined for Section B of this Policy as generating potential for increased County-Wide population greater than 5% 3% of the BEBR high range population projections for Parks, Solid Waste, Water, Sewer and Drainage facilities, or as generating a volume of traffic equal to or greater than 5% 3°/.o. of the adopted LOS standard service volume Lcvc! cf Scr':!cc C p~.u. hour ,;ol'--'m~ of an impacted roadway. There are three circumstances in which the standards for levels of service are not the exclusive determinant of need for a public facility: 1. Calculated needs for public facilities in coastal high hazard areas are subject to all limits and conditions in the Conservation and Coastal Management and Future Land Use Elements of this Growth Management Plan. 2. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and repair, remodeling and renovation, will be determined by the Board of County Commissioners upon the recommendation of the County Adm~ni-..trctcr Mana,qer. CIE- 3 Words st~ are deletions - Words underlined are additions r8B Public facilities that provide levels of service in excess of the standards adopted in this Growth Management Plan may be constructed or acquired at any time as long as the following conditions are met: the facility does not make financially unfeasible any public facility of the same type that is needed to achieve or maintain the standards for levels of service adopted in this Growth Management Plan, and the facility does not contradict, limit or substantially change the goals, objectives and policies of any element of this Growth Management Plan. Any public facility that is determined to be needed as a result of any of the factors listed in Section B and D of this Policy shall be included in the regular Schedule of Capital Improvements contained in this Capital Improvement Element. All capital improvement projects for such public facilities shall be approved in the same manner as the projects that are identified according to the quantitative analysis described in Section A of this policy. Policy 1.1.3: The determination of location of improvements to expand public facilities will take into consideration the projected growth patterns as identified in the County's annual population projections. Where applicable, public facility improvements will be coordinated with the capital facility plans of any other governmental entity providing public facilities within Collier County. Policy 1.1.4: Public facility Ao improvements within a category are to be considered in the following order or priority: Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies in levels of service. New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years, as updated by the annual review of the Capital Improvement Element. In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the capital improvements will be scheduled in the following priority order to serve: 1. previously approved development orders permitting redevelopment, 2. previously approved developmen, t orders permitting new development, 3. new development orders permitting redevelopment, and 4. new development ..orders permitting new developments. Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility. New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years by either: 1. providing excess public facility capacity that may be needed by future growth beyond the next five fiscal years, or 2. providing higher quality public facilities than are contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for such facilities. CIE- 4 Words ctruc?.thrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions "i Policy 1.1.5: The standard~ for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: Cateqor¥ A Public Facilities Arterial and collector roads, including state hiqhways not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System. FIHS) A1 Cc'_'.".t~,' Roadway. s: .... the basis A1.1 Co .... j Aarterials and collector roads: Level of Service as indicated below on of peak hour~ traffic volume: Level of Service "E" on the following designated roads: Roads Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road US 41 From - To Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Airport-Pulling Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway to US 41 ^I .... ,_D, ,,,I.... ~.....~ US 41 to I '~ Loqan Boulevard Collier Boulevard to Old US 41 Airport-Pullin.q Road Airport-Pullinq Road Davis Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Livin.qston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Golden Gate Parkway Pine Rid.qe Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Airport-Pullin,q Road US 41 to Airport-Pullin,q Road Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road US 41 to Gulfshore Drive A1.2 (i))(ll) A2 Level of Se~ice "D" peak hour~ pc:~ :c=ccn on all other Coun~ and State (not on the FIHS) a~erial and collector roadsT, hcwcvcr .... ~ ........... may ~ pcr!cd ycars ~_, pcr:cd *~ '~ ~'~* *~c; ......... c is ~c~;~*~* ....... State and Federal Roads: Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for state roads with the exception of those on the Florida Intrastate Hiflhwav System (FIHS}. In Collier County FDOT sets and maintains the LOS for 1-75. The standards for 1-75 are as follows: A3 1-75 US 4! SR 84 SR 95! SR 29 SR 82 EXISTING RURAL AREA B D D D D URBANIZED AREA C D D D TRANSlTIONING URBANIZED AREA C D D D County Surface Water Management Systems: CIE- 5 Words "* ....~'~' ..... h are deletions - Words underlined are additions A3.1 A3.2 Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74-50 and 90-10. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing levels of service identified (by design storm return frequency event) by the completed portions of the Water Management Master Plan as listed in the Drainage/Water Management Subelement of the Public Facilities Element. (i) A4 A4.1 A4.2 A4.3 County Potable Water Systems: County systems County Water District - 185 gallons per capita per day Goodland Water District - 163 gallons per capita per day City of Naples = 163 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area City of Everglades - 163 gallons per capita per day in the u_Dnincorporated service area Private potable water systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.3.1 of the Potable Water Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. A5 A5.1 A5.2 A5.3 County Sanitary Sewer Systems: County systems: North Sewer Service Area = 145 gallons per capita per day South Sewer Service Area = !21100 gallons per capita per day City of Naples = 121 gallons per capita per day in the unincorporated service area Private sanitary sewer systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.2.1 of the Sanitary Sewer Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. (11) A6 A6.1 A6.2 A7 A7.1 A7.2 A7.3 Category B B1 (I)(11) B2 B3 B4 O1= County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities: Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years Ten years of permittable capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years. County Parks and Recreation Facilities: Regional Park land Community Park land Recreation facilities cost) Public Facilities: County Library Buildings: 0.33 square feet per capita County Library Collection: 1.35 2.05 books per capita by FY 10 County Jail: 0.0024 beds per capita (2.4 beds per 1000 population) County Emergency Medical Service: .000068 EMS units per capita (1 Unit/15,000. population) County ...................................... ~' .... ~' .... r- .... *" Dcpcndcnt ~i,,, = 2.9412 acres per 1,000/pop. = 1.2882 acres per 1,000/pop. = $4-/n nn $240.00 capital investment per capita CIE- 6 Words ~'~ .... ~'*~' ..... ~' - ~,, ........... ~.. are deletions Words underlined are additions r8B Ochcpoc D!st;ict C3.! C3.2 C4.! C~ C7 Arc=: lira!tod tc no mcrc than 50% of T,, mdntaln .... p+;,-,~'"' cbjccts+ .... ,~;+;~,~-' Physic=! CIE- 7 Words ctruckthrc'--'gh are deletions - Words underlined are additions "8El C8.! C8.2 1. B,?/,L~,.,+~II r,,-,, ,~ ~ 1/~,nnn ..... m~+;~ 4, ~+~ .~ 7. Fcctba, :;-,~. ,.,.. = 1/!0,000 ~-~-.--'-'m"+;~"' 11 ~;~;~ a .... = 1/~,0nn ..... m~+i~ p~¥ a .... : 1 2 13. 15 .............. ~ ..... 4R T~;~ COU~S = 1/2,000 ..... I~+;A~ ~mm Courts E, ,,., ,.,., i ,., ,..i,., ,, r,;h,. 1 2. 5. Fcctb:1{ c;"ld~ = .1/534 ..... 6. c,,~,,;m;,-,,-,~- - 1/53~ ..... 7. 0;,.-,,-,;,-, ^,',~,',L" ~ '1 /~! 8. C~)l,-~l Am'~ ~ 'I /l~ ~,.',,l~,l ,I,,-~,l.;,,,~r~ · · m-abm hl.,,~e +,, c) ..... +'""' . CIE- 8 Words ''+ .... ............. ~.. are deletions - Words underlined are additions Cc!lJor r. .... ~., ,,...-,hi.. Op to ' '="~ grccc ama cha!l .......... cpc~ cpace t',,, t ,,I CIE- 9 Words "* .... t.,h ..... ~' are deletions - Words underlined are additions FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY OBJECTIVE 1.2: Provide public facilities in order to maintain adopted level of service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund, or within the County's authority to require others to provide. Existing facility deficiencies measured against the adopted level of service standards will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and intergovernmental revenues received based on economic activity. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special assessments and taxes. Policy 1.2.1: The estimated capital expenditures for all needed public facilities shall not exceed conservative estimates of revenues from sources that are available to the County pursuant to current law, and which have not been rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required to enact a source of revenue. Policy 1.2.2: Existing and future development shall both pay for the costs of needed public facilities. Existing development shall pay for some or all facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, some or all of the replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and may pay a portion of the cost of facilities needed by future development. Both existing and future development may have part of their costs paid by grants, entitlements or public facilities from other levels of government and independent districts. Policy 1.2.3: Public facilities financed by County enterprise funds (i.e., potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste) may be financed by debt to be repaid by user fees and charges for enterprise services, or the facilities may be financed from current assets (i.e., reserves, surpluses and current revenue). Policy 1.2.4: Public facilities financed by non-enterprise funds (i.e., roads, surface water management, parks, library, emergency medical service, and jail, c*~' ............ * ~''';['~;''~'', shall be financed from current revenues and assets (pay-as-you-go financing) and revenue bonds approved by the Board of County Commissioners." .... * ~.., .,.-~-*, .~.[ ....... ~' 5crrc;':i,",....3 c ,",!~,' fi,q=,-,cmg ..... mcct "+""'~""'~" ~"" ]c''''["' cf .... " ............, ,,,~+~, ..... ,~ .... [ .....* Debt financing shall not be used to provide excess capacity in non-enterprise public facilities unless the excess capacity is an unavoidable result of a capital improvement that is needed to achieve or maintain standards for levels of service. Notwithstanding other provisions of this policy, general obligation bonds approved by referendum may be used for any public facilities to acquire capacity needed within the fivc Schedule of. (~Capital i/mprovements plan or for excess capacity. Policy 1.2.5: The County shall not provide a public facility, nor shall it accept the provision of a public facility by others, if the County is unable to pay for the subsequent annual operating and maintenance costs of the facility. CIE -10 Words ctr,.'ckthrc'JGh are deletions - Words underlined are additions (11) 8B " Policy 1,2.6: The County shall continue to collect Road Impact Fees for road facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance transportation improvements necessitated by such development. Policy 1.2.7: The County shall continue to collect impact fees for Parks and Recreation, EMS and Library facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance Parks and Recreation, EMS and Library improvements necessitated by such development. Policy 1.2.8: If, for any reason, the County cannot provide revenue sources identified as needed funding for specific projects within the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements, the Growth Management Plan shall be amended based on one or more of the following actions: Remove through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements that exceed the adopted levels of service for the growth during the next five (5) fiscal years; Remove from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities that reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility but do not provide additional facility capacity; Where feasible, transfer funds from a funded Non-Capital Improvement Element capital project in order to fund an identified deficient Capital Improvement Element public facility. The resulting revisions shall be reflected in the required annual update. Lower the adopted level of service standard through a plan amendment for the facility for which funding cannot be obtained. Do not issue development orders that would continue to cause a deficiency based on the facility's adopted level of service standard. Policy 1.2.9: Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources of 13%. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self-imposed level of constraint. Current bondable revenues are ad valorem taxes and State-shared revenues, specifically gas taxes and the half-cent sales tax. The Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy. CIE-11 Words ''+ .... ~'+~' ..... ~' ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions PUBLIC EXPENDITURES: COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA OBJECTIVE 1.3: Effective with plan implementation public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area shall be limited to those facilities needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the Future Land Use Element. In addition, public expenditures shall include the following categories: A. Maintenance of existing public facilities; B. Beach, shore and waterway access; C. Beach renourishment. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high hazard area for the replacement and maintenance of public facilities identified in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 1.3,2: The calculated needs for public facilities will be based on the adopted level of service standards and future growth projections within the coastal high hazard area. The Future Land Use Element limits new residential development (thus obligations for infrastructure expenditures) to a maximum of four dwelling units per gross acre within portions of the coastal high hazard area. Policy 1.3.3: The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and will develop a program to expand the availability of such including funding options for acquisition. ~;'~*~'"" c ....... ,~ ---,~, ................................. ~' ..................... CIE -12 Words o' ....~"~' ..... ~ are deletions - Words underlined are additions f'SB PROVIDE NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS OBJECTIVE 1.4: The County shall coordinate its land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital improvements by providing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders. Policy 1.4.1: The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. iR-the ,,c) .... Caplt:l ~....~.....v.,,v.,.* c,_,v.,,~,,,., The Schedule of Capital Improvements may be modified as follows: A. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be updated annually. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3187, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, developments of regional impact, and certain small scale development activities. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3177, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan. Policy 1.4.2: All Category A public facility capital improvements shall be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Policy 1.4.3: The County shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget all the public facility projects listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements for expenditures during the appropriate fiscal year. Projects for which appropriations have been made in the annual budget will not be removed once they have been relied upon for the issuance of a final site development plan, final plat1 or building permit. The County mc~.' :Ico shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget additional public facility projects that conform to Policy 1.1.2 (B.3) and Policy 1.1.4 (C) and (E). Policy 1.4.4: The County shall determine, prior to the issuance of final site development plans, final plats and building permits, whether or not there is sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for existing population and the proposed development. No final site development plan, final plat, or building permit shall be issued unless the levels of service for the resulting development will achieve the standards in Policy 1.1.5 Category A, and the requirements for Concurrency Management as outlined in the policies within Objective 1.5 of this element are met. Policy 1.4.5: Public facilities and services provided by Collier County with public funds in accordance with the 5-year Schedule of Capital Improvements in the Capital Improvements Element will be limited to Service Areas established within the boundaries designated on Map PW-1 titled, "Collier County's Three (3) Water and/or Sewer Districts Boundaries" and PW-3 titled, "Rural Transition Water & Sewer District" appearing in the Public Facilities Element for water and sewer. Roads improvements will be provided as designated on the Schedule of Capital Improvements M~p TR '!.W t!t!cd, "5 ~,'c~r Cc~!t~l , .......... , ,-, .... , hA...," r-; .... ~"*~"" Capital Improvement Element. All .... ~. .................... appearing in the Traffic other public facilities and service types will be provided on a County-wide availability basis. CIE -13 Words "' .... u,~, ..... ~- are deletions - Words underlined are additions 8B CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE 1.5: To ensure that public facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development, the County's Concurrency Management System shall be consistent with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-5.0055, Florida Administrative Code. The County shall establish a regulatory and monitoring program to ensure the scheduling, funding and timely construction of Category A public facilities concurrent with, or prior to, the issuance of a final site development plan, final plat or a building permit to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards. Policy 1.5.1: The concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage and Solid Waste Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: A. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or B. The necessary facilities and services are under construction at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or C. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of paragraphs A and B of this policy. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. The agreement must guarantee that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the development occur. Policy 1.5.2: The concurrency requirement for the Parks and Recreation~,,.~"~"~ r~....,v~,, v~.-w° .... Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: Co Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policy 1.5.1 A, B and C is met; or At the time the final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed contract which provides for commencement of actual construction of the required facilities within one year of the issuance of the final site development plan, final plat or building permit; or The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement which requires the commencement of the actual construction of the facilities within one year of the issuance of the applicable final site development plan, final plat, or building permit. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Policy 1.5.3: CIE -14 Words "* ....~'*~' ..... ~ ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions The concurrency requirement of the Traffic C!rcul~tlc,", Transportation Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System a-m is met: A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policies 1.5.1 A, B, and C and 1.5.2 B and C is met; or B. In areas in which Collier County has committed to provide the necessary public facilities and services in accordance with its five-year schedule of capital improvements, the concurrency requirement of the Tr,?.ffic C~rcu!~t!c,". Transportation Level of Service Standards wcu!d shall be achieved or maintained if all of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System, based upon an Adequate Capital Improvements Program and adequate implementing regulations are met: 1. A Capital Improvement Element and a five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which, in addition to meeting all of the other statutory and rule requirements, must be financially feasible. The Capital Improvement Element and Schedule of Capital Improvements may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of the applicable, adopted Florida Department of Transportation five-year work program. 2. A five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which must include both necessary facilities to maintain the adopted level of service standards to serve the new development proposed to be permitted and the necessary facilities required to eliminate those portions of existing deficiencies which are a priority to be eliminated during the five-year period under the Schedule of Capital Improvements. 3. A realistic, financially feasible funding system based on currently available revenue sources which must be adequate to fund the public facilities required to serve the development authorized by the building permit and which public facilities are included in the five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements. 4. A five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which must include the estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion. 5. A five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which must demonstrate that all actual construction of the road facilities ~nd +~',, ,v ...... ~., v. i"~"",~.v,, '''~, .... I""~ is scheduled to commence in or before the third year of the five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements. 6. A plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or delay construction of any road project which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year Schedule of Improvements. (11) Policy 1.5.4: The County shall continue to implement a Concurrency Management System, as identified imthe .~,dcquatc c~, ,h,~,- :-,,-~,~*~,-,- O-,~ ..... k,,, n~ ~o C,,,~.'~.',,~ in Division 3.15 of the Collier County Land Development Code, which shall include a regulatory program and monitoring system consistent with this Growth Management Plan and consistent specifically with the policies under Objective 1.5 of this Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring system shall enable the County to determine whether it is adhering to the adopted Level of Service Standards and its Schedule of Capital Improvements. REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION CIE -15 Words ctr,--'c~thrcu.~h are deletions -Words underlined are additions ?SB SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The Schedule of Capital Improvements on the following pages will eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out facilities, and make available adequate facilities for future growth. Each project is numbered and named, and its cost during each of the next five fiscal years is shown in thousands of dollars (000). The month and year for actual commencement of construction and the month and year each project will be completed (in service) is indicated. Each project in Category A is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element and the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Each project in Category B is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element. Optional elements were not developed for Category B facilities. CIE-16 Words "* ....~'*~ ..... ~ are deletions- Words underlined are additions 0 o 0 o o o ~-) Z 0 -I 0 UJ UJ ~U I- Z 0 0 rr ..I ..J 0 o o o o ~Wo° .-I__ LIJ 0 0 a: o o o o o 0 o Z 0 _ -I m 0 0 I- Z UJ Z o I-- Z >- 0 Z o ._l 0 Z t~ 1.1_ c~l o _.1 .--_o > _.J o o o o o u3 o o o 0 o o o o o o o o 0 ILl .J I-' Z UJ LU 0 Q. -.I 0 >- 0 m,,,~ LLI I-- "3 813 '"i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L~ 0 I:1. .-I ..I .-I 0 I-- 0 U.I < 0 o~ m 0 Z 0 =~ z 0 · ~ o~ t8B o o o o o o co o o o o c~ c~ o t~ I- Z W ..I Z 0 0 .,J UJ o~ w 0 0),z (:3 8B o ~ O 0 ,-I .-I >- Z ILl i- U. L~ LU O 0 .fi& = z UJ 0 L~ .~o~ 0 c~ o 0 o OC ~J ~oo 0 r8B U.I .-I U.I C~ Z UJ 0 ...J W 1 .J o~ .~o 0 UJ 0 o g o o 0 ~0 o I- Z -- ILl --I 1 o 0 o r8B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~') LO LO LO LO LO L~) 0 0 0 0 ~0 0 Z U.I U,I ,.I UJ Z LU 0 t8B 0 0 t~8B 0 ,...I 0 0 0 I- Z U.I ..J U.I Z U.I 0 I- Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iii 0 FSB zI ~8B ~8B Z m 0 w r8B 0 I- z u.I ..I z u.I 0 ._1 0 ,_l _J '8B "' COSTS & REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY) In the table below, the left column itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The center column contains the 5-year (FY02-06) amounts of facility specific revenues. The right column is a calculation of expenses vs. revenues for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. Below the subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue that will be used by the County to fund the deficit in order to maintain the standards for levels of service listed in CIE Policy 1.1.5. COUNTY ROADS PROJECTS/EXPENSES LESS Available Revenues: Gas Taxes $ Road Impact Fees Carry Forward/Grants/Misc. Revenue Bonds General Fund Transfer (FY 03) Commercial Paper Loans 83,080,000 150,000,000 61,277,000 192,920,000 4,200,000 48,538,000 Deficit $602,875,000 602,875,000 0 DRAINAGE PLANS AND PROJECTS LESS Available Revenues: SFWMD FDEP Naples 326,000 9,874,000 60,000 Deficit 18,808,000 10,260,000 (8,548,000) WATER & SEWER SYSTEMS LESS: Impact Fees/User Fees SOLID WASTE/LANDFILL Balance Balance 155,422,000 155,422,000 0 0 PARKS & RECREATION LESS Available Revenues: Park Impact Fees Bonds/Revenue Boating Improvement Funds 44,323,000 75O,OOO Balance 45,073,000 45,073,000 0 49 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE Less: EMS Impact Fees JAIL Deficit Balance $ 6,650,000 2,341,000 (4,309,000) LIBRARYBULDINGS AND BANKS Less: Library Impact Fees Deficit Balance 15,703,000 6,828,000 (8,875,000) Subtotal of Facility Specific Revenues vs. Costs ADD: Non-Facility Specific Revenues: General Fund Revenues Deficit Balance (21,732,O00) 21,732,000 $o CIE 50 PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION Through continued implementation of adopted land development regulations the following programs have been implemented to ensure that the goals, objectives and policies established in the Capital Improvement Element will be achieved or exceeded. 1. "'"'~-~'--' ""-'""+ Development Order Review ~..~dl. 1111 As part of the review of all applications for final site development plans, final plats, and building permits, the County will determine whether or not there will be sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for the existing population and for the proposed development in accordance with the requirements of the Concurrency Management System. As part of the review for all development orders havin.q ne.qative impacts on Cate.qory A Public Facilities other than final site development plans, final plats, or buildinq permits, the County will determine whether or not sufficient capacity of Cate.qory "^" public facilities are planned for construction concurrent with the impacts on levels of service that will be created by the proposed development durinq the next five fiscal years. ,32. Impact Fees Impact Fee Ordinances will require the same standard for the level of service as is required by Policy 1.1.5. 43. Annual Budget The annual budget will include in its capital appropriations all projects in the Schedule of Capital Improvements that are planned for expenditures during the next fiscal year. 64. Semiannual Report The mandatory semiannual report to the Department of Community Affairs concerning amendments to the comprehensive plan due to emergencies, developments of regional impact and selected small developments will report on changes, if any, to adopted goals, objectives and policies in the Capital Improvement Element. 65. Update of Capital Improvement Element The monitoring of and adjustment to the Capital Improvement Element to meet the changing conditions must be an ongoing process. Beginning in August of each year, the element will be updated in conjunction with the County's budget process and the release of the official BEBR population estimates and projections. The update will include: 1. Revision of population projections; 2. Updates of facility inventory; 3. Update of unit costs; Update of facilities requirements analysis to project 10 year needs (by fiscal year) in order to program projects to meet the service standards. 5. Update of revenue forecasts in order to evaluate financial feasibility and the CIE 51 County's ability to finance capital improvements needed to meet the Service standards Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next five years. The first year's schedule of projects will be incorporated into the County's budget effective October 1st. 7. Update of the public school and health facilities analysis. 7-6. Concurrency Mana,qement System The County has established a Concurrency Management System by adoption of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The system consists of the following components: The Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR) '-"-'-;*'--;'-'-rcport on the capacity and levels of service of public facilities compared to the standards for levels of service adopted in Policy 1.1.5 of this Element. The AUIR r~ summarizes the actual capacity of existing public facilities and forecasts the capacity of existing and planned public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years. For the purposes of long range capital facility planning, a ten year forecast of projected needed capacity is also done. These forecasts are based on the most recently updated Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvements Element. The annual approval of the AUIR and the identified needed projects and revenues by the Board of County Commissioners 'r~,.',.,, ,,v =nnu=l , .... ,,~..,,'*, constitutes evidence of the capacity and levels of service of Cate.qory A__public facilities for the purpose of issuing development orders during the 12 months following q:the approval ccmp!ctlcn of the AUIR am~a4-r.~. Thlc rcpcrt "" thc Ann'c=! I I,~,-I,~.,~ ,*,~,.,I I,~,,~,~',~, [~,r,,,-,~.{. ,.~ [~..1~1;,-, r",-,,.,;I;H,~-, /Al IIr'~ Public facility capacity review. The County shall use the procedures specified in Implementation Programs 1 and 2-6 to enforce the requirements of Policies 1.5.1, 1.5.2 and 1.5.3 of this Element. Review of changes in planned capacity of public facilities. The County shall review each amendment to this Capital Improvement Element in particular any changes in standards for levels of service and changes in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in order to enforce the policies of this Element. Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies. The County shall annually review the Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies that are incorporated in this Capital Improvement Element: Standards for levels of service are applied within appropriate geographical areas of the County. Standards for County-Wide public facilities are applied to development orders based on levels of service throughout the County. Standards for public facilities that serve less than the entire County are applied to development orders on the basis of levels of service within assigned areas. Levels of service are compared to adopted standards on an annual basis. Annual monitoring is used, rather than case-by-case monitoring, for the following reasons: annual monitoring corresponds to annual expenditures for capital improvements during the County's fiscal year; and b. annual monitoring covers seasonal variations in levels of service. CIE 52 '813 87. Second 5-year Evaluation and Appraisal Report The required second 5-year evaluation and appraisal report will address the implementation of the goals, objectives and policies of the Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring procedures necessary to enable the completion of the 5-year evaluation include: a. Review of annual reports of the Concurrency Management System; Review of semiannual reports to DCA concerning amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and Co Review of annual updates of this Capital Improvement Element, including updated supporting documents. CIE 53 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Symbol Date Amended ** October 28, 1997 (I) February 23, 1997 (11) May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 97-62 Ordinance No. 99-13 Ordinance No. 2000-32 This is the EAR-based amendment. Due to the magnitude of the changes - which included reformatting the entire Element, affecting every page of the Element - a Roman Numeral is not assigned. Indicates adopted portions Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. Words ctrucP, thrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions I'SB CD. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY As part of the Transportation Element, the County established minimum acceptable level of service standards on the existing highway system. For mcat County facilities, the level of service standard to be maintained is "D" or "E" as measured on a peag-sea~m peak hour basis. Several County and State facilities have been given a minimum LOS "E" standard. To maintain the adopted LOS on roadways, the County has implemented a concurrency management regulatory program that ties issuance of development orders to the demonstration of adequate capacity on all roadway segments that would be significantly impacted by new development. In summatw this program maintains an inventory of the following for each arterial and collector roadway segment: · Actual traffic on each segment as determined through an annual traffic counting program, · The peak hour service capacity as determined by engineering analyses performed by the Transportation Division, and Capacity that will be used by new development for which a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities has been issued. In order to prevent sudden unanticipated LOS failures, the County will adopt, within one year or sooner, a "real time .... checkbook accounting" concurrency management process. See the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code) for details of this process. 1. Adz fac.-.z~ on the tc ,u~...~ LOS "E" 11 Words ctruckthrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions 1. Monitoring Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code is also known as the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO). It describes the annual count program done on County roads to determine their annual average daily traffic (AADT). It describes how the relationship between that AADT and the segment's adopted level of service (LOS) standard determines the road segment's level of service. The current levels of service at which road segments are operating are reported annually in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). This report indicates which segments are operating at levels of service worse than their adopted standard LOS. It also contains predictions of when certain segments will reach levels of service that exceed their adopted standard LOS. Although traffic volumes are expressed as AADT, LOS calculations are done to ensure adequate levels of service_, during peak Peak season, peak hour traffic conditions are skewed in Collier County because of the heavy influx of seasonal residents and tourists. As such, it is deemed an inappropriate and unreasonable imposition on taxpayers to provide a roadway system designed for the peak of the peak season. Therefore, the LOS calculations are based on traffic conditions experienced for 10 months of the year with the peak seasonal and tourist months of February and March omitted from the analysis. 2. LOS Determination And BCC Findings The annual average daily volumes will be calculated and the peak hour volume interpreted based upon the available data consistent with omitting February and March tourist months from the analysis. The Transportation ~ Division shall pr-epar-e~ maintain and update a list of all roadway segments, for which a level of service standard has been adopted, that shows the current LOS ~"- ~ .... :~.~ .u .... ~ pl ~ ................... ~ as well as the adopted LOS standard found in this an. mu:o ,:~. :~ ~,~- ~Cl-I..~ ATTTD Fc!!c;ving '~' ......... :^_ ~c +~ .... ~ ...... ':~' ilf the volume of traffic of any segments are is found to exceed their its adopted LOS, a report of the ~ Division's findings ...... :~., ~c ~.~ Ceunty'g ~^-~ will be transmitted to the Board of County Commissioners. The APFO describes the consequences of a road segment operating at a LOS that exceeds its adopted LOS standard. 12 Words ctruc~thrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions 2.1 Constrained Roadways Constrained facilities are roadways which have been designated by action of the Board of County Commissioners once it has been determined that the facility will not be expanded by two or more through lanes due to physical, environmental or policy constraints. Physical constraints primarily occur when a roadway is developed to the maximum six-lane standard or when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to roads, thus making expansion cost prohibitive. Environmental and policy constraints primarily occur when decisions are made not to expand a road based on environmental, historical, archaeological, aesthetic or social impact considerations. Constrained roadways are identified by action of the BCC upon the recommendation of the Transportation Administrator. Roadways identified as constrained shall be subject to growth restrictions such that further LOS degradation does not occur once the roadway is determined to be operating below Level-of- Service standard. Constrained roadways are subject to growth restrictions that only allow for an increase in annual daily traffic volume of 10% above the service volume at Level-of-Service standard resulting in LOS operations not to exceed 110% of service volume. If the service volume ~ exceeded bv 10%, only de minimis growth could be applied to the roadway segment. 13 Words "'+ ....~'+~' ..... ~' ............. ~,, are de~euons -Words underlined are additions 14 Words ctruckthrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions J'81 (II) (II) GOALS~ OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO PLAN FOR, DEVELOP AND OPERATE A SAFE, EFFICIENT, AND COST EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES FOR BOTH THE MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT COLLIER COUNTY. OBJECTIVE 1: The County will maintain the major roadway systemw-~-,~-.-..~,~-"'".4:-~ o,-,,~e .... ..~..~;~' ....... .../oj~ at an acceptable Level of Service by implementing improvements as identified in the annual AUIR or by working directly with other responsible jurisdictions to implement needed improvements to their facilities. CIE # Roadway From To ~] D;~ D;~l~ 0,4 A ;~- 0.4 T ~ 71 Immcka!ee Road CR951 W~l:cn Blvd. Policy 1.1: The County will annually adopt a Schedule of Capital Improvements an Annua! Update and ~ .......... o ..... r a ~,mx covering a period no less than five (5) years, which shall include those projects needed to maintain the network at the adopted Level of Service standard. Policy 1.2: The County shall annually appropriate the funds in the ensuing fiscal year to accommodate those phases of projects listed in the first year of the Schedule of Capital Improvements Annua! Update .--.4 T .......... D ..... /ATTm~ all pProgramming decisions are based on the AUIR, and annually incorporated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in the CIE. Policy 1.3: County arterial and collector roads as well as State highways not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) shall be maintained at Level of Service "D" or better as addressed in paragraph G-1 of the Transportation Element cn "'~,,.~ ~'"":"~.o.o ~.^¢ *~'.,~ .... v*~-' ....... o~.o~,, peak ,,~.. ~ .... traffic volume except: Level of Service "E" or better shall be maintained on the following designated roadways. Roadway Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road US 41 Airport-Pullinq Road Airport-Pullinq Road Davis Boulevard From T._.~o Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway Airport-Pulling Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkway US 41 Golden Gate Parkway A; .... + D, ,,,.'.... Read US 41 ' ?A Logan Blvd. Collier Boulevard Old US 41 US 41 Golden Gate Parkway Pine Ridqe Road US 41 Golden Gate Parkway US 41 Vanderbilt Beach Road Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Golden Gate Parkway US 41 Airport-Pullinq Road Airport-Pullinq Road Radio Road Gulfshore Drive 15 Words ctrucP, thrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions !811 (II) Level of Service "D" or better shall be maintained on all other county and state arterial and collector roads. ~' improvement:. The /~^11:~. tTM ....... ~PO Collier County Transportation Division shall determine the-optimum LOS ~ ..... ~' ..... * ..... ~ ....... m~.: .... :" ~'~ ~-~ ~ ............... ~" :~-~:~":-~ the traffic volumes that co~espond to the different LOS thresholds on county roads:, and mere accurately CO~ ...................... ~ ......... ~ u~ .............. ~ ........ ~ ......, ~ ................... Transpo~ation Division shaft install, as funds pe~t, permanent traffic count stations to better identi(y traffic characteristics of county roads. Based on the traffic count data the Transportation Division shall develop a financially feasible Roads component for the Capital Improvement Program of the C~. Policy 1.4: of gerv:.ce standards for state ma:.nta~ned rcad:: Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for State Roads with the exception of those on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS). In Collier County, FDOT sets the LOS standards for 1-75. The standards for 1-75 are as follows: Existing Rural Area Urbanized Area Transitioning Urbanized Area I- 75 B C C ~ G D D gR--84 D D D SR 951 D D .eR 29 D - - £R 82 D - - 16 Words ctruckthrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions OBJECTIVE 2: The County will maintain the adopted Level of Service standard as provided for in Policy 1.3 by making the improvements identified on the Five (5) Year Work Program. Tr-df:.c C:.rc'.:ladc,n Policy 2.1: The County shall include in its Schedule of Capital Improvements in the Capital Improvement Element those projects necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service on the roads identified on the Five (5) Year Work Program. T~.~:c.~ r-; .... ~.,;^_ ~,~ (II) Policy 2.2: The County shall annually appropriate the funds necessary to implement those projects shown in the ann-.:al element (first year) of the Schedule of Capital Improvements Ann-.:a! Update and OBJECTIVE 3: The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future right-of-ways. Policy 3.1: The County has implemented an advanced Right-of-Way Preservation and Acquisition Program. Policy 3.2: The County includes in its annual Capital Improvement Element nc, ~ .... ~'-~ $299,999 ........ funding specifically earmarked for use in an advanced Right-of-Way Acquisition Program. ]~ ~b~x)9-gr-, sS_tudsqes shall be conducted periodically to identify the long range right-of way needs of the transportation system based on buildout. Following t~e their completion, of t~g need.the Transportation Administrator will present a program of funding of actions to protect and acquire needed fight-of-way. (II) Policy 3.3: tt~- Cl ..... PcScy ~ ~ ~ m ......... :~ c~ ..... PeScy 7.4) The County shall acquire sufficient amount of right-of-way to hcilitate no less than a cross section of (6) tr~fic lanes, appropriate mm lanes, medians, bicycle and pedestrian features, drainage canals, ~d shoulder sufficient for pull offs ~d landscaping areas. Exceptions to the right-of-way standard may be considered when it can be demonstrated, through a traffic capacity analysis, that the maximum number of lanes at build-out will be less than the standard. Policy 3.4: Collier County shall acquire fights-of-way for transportation improvements in fee simple, unless otherwise determined appropriate by the BCC based upon recommendation of the Transportation Administrator. 17 Words ctruc~through are deletions - Words underlined, are additions (II) (II) OBJECTIVE 4: The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, and motorized and non-motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan. Policy 4.1: The County shall, incorporate the Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan by reference and update the Plan as needed. Policy 4.2: The County shall provide for support services, and resources and staff within the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization to coordinate the Bicycle/Pedestrian Program. Policy 4.3: The County shall provide an interconnected and continuous bicycle and pedestrian system by making the improvements identified on the 2020 Pathway Facilities Map series as funds permit. The County's pathway construction program should be consistent with the Comprehensive Pathway Plan. The Pathway Advisory Committeeo..w.~'~"~" ..... v.v ..~.:'~ shall, to the maximum extent feasible, provide recommendations on the choice of projects to be included in the pathway construction program, and the order in which they are constructed. Policy 4.4: The County shall annually adopt a 5 Year Pathway Work Program which establishes pathway priorities to retrofit existing streets to accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. Policy 4.5: The County shall, to the greatest extent possible, identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathway Work Program. Policy 4.6: The County shall provide for the safe movement of motorized vehicles through implementation of its Land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances and shall incorporate both bike lanes~ and sidewalks and pathways as deemed appropriate in new construction and reconstruction of roadways. Policy 4.7: The County shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically possible and will not result in a safety or operational problem. Policy 4.8: The County shall follow the most current bicycle and pedestrian facilities design and construction standards developed by the Florida Department of Transportation to the extent which is physically and safely possible. OBJECTIVE 5: The County will coordinate the Transportation System development process with the Future Land Use Map. 18 Words "* .... ~-*~' ..... ~' are deletions -Words underlined are additions 8B Policy 5.1: The County Commission will review all rezone requests with consideration of their impact on the overall system, and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service within the five year planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. Traffic analyses to determine significant project impact shall use the following to determine the study area: a. On links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b, For links adiacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 5% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Policy 5.2: Project traffic that is ]ess than ]% of the adopted p¢~ hour volume represents a de ~ni~s impact. Policy 5.3 The County will conduct a Traffic Impact Vesting Affirmation Review over the next year to determine which developments are vested for concurrency, the schedule of when these developments will be built and the magnitude of traffic that will be generated by these developments. During this process of vesting affirmation, revisions to approved final site development plans and final subdivision plats that decrease the impact of the development through such methods as reducing density, making additional provisions for mixed use development to capture trips or providing additional transportation system interconnections may be considered without risking vested status. OBJECTIVE 6: The County shall coordinate the Transportation Element with the plans and programs of the State, Region, and other local jurisdictions. (II) Policy 6.1: The Transportation Element shall incorporate to the greatest degree possible, the long range plans of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization. 19 Words o, .... u+~ ..... ~, ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions (II) Policy 6.2: The Transportation Element shall consider any and all applicable roadway plans of the City of Naples, City of Marco Island, Florida Department of Transportation, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and Lee County. Policy 6.3: The Transportation Element shall be consistent in its interface into the arterial/collector system within the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island. Policy 6.4: The Transportation Element shall consider the State's adopted Five (5) Year Work Program, the Florida Transportation Plan, and the State Land Development Plan. Policy 6.5 The Collier County MPO's adopted Long Range Plan has identified a need for an interchange at 1-75 and Golden Gate Parkway and a grade separated overpass at Airport Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway ^_ T~ .... T...,:c:~n,:~- o~. ~. ~. ........ ~ ~... ~,.~ r:~^~:~ -,~ .....~nnn . The above projects are now in the MPO Transportation Improvement Program along with the six-laning of Golden Gate Parkway. The County shall insure that the three projects mentioned above will be fully coordinated in timing and design. OBJECTIVE 7: The County shall develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, as well as encourage safe and convenient on-site traffic circulation. Policy 7.1: ..... :*" Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as may be amended to ensure the protection of the arterial and collector system' s capacity and integrity. Policy 7.2: The County shall require the submission of a neighborhood traffic impact assessment as a part of all rezone and conditional use applications. This study will analyze the proposed project's impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. Policy 7.3: The County shall implement, through its Zoning Ordinance, the provision of safe and convenient on-site traffic flow and the need for adequate parking for motorized and non-motorized vehicles as a primary objective in review for Planned Unit Developments, Site Development Plans, and other appropriate stages of review in the land development applications process. Policy 7.4: The County shall develop corridor management plans / .... ~ ~' ...... T .--.4 TT~ C1 ..... '~ that take into consideration urban design and landscaping measures that will promote positive development along the major arterial entrances to the urban area. Such plans shall take into account the Community Character Plan and the initiatives of Smart Growth as the Board of County Commissioners may annually appropriate funding for these plans. 20 Words "* .... t,,~, ..... ~' are deletions -Words underlined are additions Policy 7.5 standard~ for landgcap;~ng cnhancement~ al~ng major road cc~d~r~. Thi~ Plan ab~ i~cntifiz~ a ~ ................ : ...................... v ................. ~ ~urce~. The County shall develop Co~idor Access Management Plans. Such plans shall be designed to m~e medi~ modifications and other operational improvements, including removal of traffic signals, necessau to recapture lost capacity and enhance safety. OBJECTIVE 8: The County shall establish and maintain a "Concurrency Management scheduling, funding, and timely construction of necessary road facilities. System" for the Policy 8.1 Each year, the county will use short term projections of previous years' traffic volume growth to estimate the year in which LOS deficiencies will occur on county roads. This information will be used to prepare the annual update of the county's Schedule of Capital Improvements T ........... r:~ ..... c .....No in a manner that ensures the maintenance of concurrency on road facilities. Policy 8.2 Pursuant to Chapter 163.3180 F.S., and in accordance with the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Land Development Code Division 3.15), development proposals shall be required to submit traffic impact analyses. ,u^ ~ .... ~ ^,, .~,~:~ Ac ..,u:~u ~u,u ~.~ a .... :_Aa ~.., ,uA OBJECTIVE 9: The County shall encourage neighborhood involvement and safe and pleasant conditions for the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists on neighborhood streets, not classified as arterials or collectors, through the implementation of the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). Policy 9.1 The County shall incorporate the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program by reference and update as needed. Policy 9.2 The County shall provide for support services, resources and staff to coordinate the Program. Policy 9.3 The County shall encourage require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate the convenient movement throughout the !oc"2 road network. Policy 9.4 The County shall define on a project by project basis, the acceptable amount of rerouted traffic as a result of a traffic management project Policy 9.5 The County shall route through traffic to the major roadways designated in the Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 21 Words ctrucRthmugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions Policy 9.6 The County shall review neighborhoods. impacts on emergency vehicle access or response time to Policy 9.7 r:~:.. ........... ~:~:~.~o c^~ ,u~ xvr~sr~ identified as collector or a~efial facilities ~e not eligible for the ~P. Policy 9.8 The County shall emFIc, y consider a variety of traffic calming devices to achieve the NTMP'S objectives for a project. Such traffic calming devices shall be planned and designed in conformance with sound engineering and planning practices. Primau funding for such plans shall come from the local funding initiatives such as MSTUs or MSTBUs for the area to benefit from the traffic calming. Policy 9.9 To implement the NTMP, certain procedures shall be followed in processing neighborhood traffic management requests in accordance with applicable codes and related policies and within the limits of available resources. At a minimum, the procedures shall provide for: submittal of project proposals; evaluation of proposals by staff; citizen participation in plan development and evaluation; methods of temporarily testing traffic management plans when needed; communication of any test results and specific findings to area residents and affected neighborhood organizations before installation of permanent traffic calming devices; and appropriate County Commission review. OBJECTIVE 10 The County shall encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public. Policy 10.1 The County shall develop a program to examine the maintenance and operational needs of the rural roadway system. This program will address the mobility needs of the rural resident to include the availability of roads for rural-to-urban travel, as well as for hurricane evacuation purposes. Policy 10.2 The County shall continue to improve transit services for the Transportation Disadvantaged in the rural areas through the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC). (II) Policy 10.3 The County shall incorporate herein by reference the Corridor Management Plan for the Tamiami Trail Scenic Highway, which formed part of the application for Scenic Highway designation authorized by the Board of County Commissioners on November 3, 1998. OBJECTIVE 11 The County shall maintain County owned airport facilities as attractive, efficient, safe, and environmentally compatible facilities 22 Words ctruc~thrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) (II) (II) (II) Policy 11.1 The County shall incorporate by reference the Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and Marco Island Executive Airport Master Plans. Policy 11.2 The Collier County Airport Authority shall determine the most cost effective and efficient means for implementing future facility plans outlined within the airport master plans. OBJECTIVE 12: The County shall encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future. Policy 12.1: The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization, through the Transportation Disadvantaged Program shall assist the local community transportation coordinator in the implementation of the most efficient and effective level of service possible for the transportation disadvantaged. Policy 12.2: The County Transportation Division and the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization shall coordinate the development and maintenance of transit development plans with the C-og~ r, ....... ~s ......~:~_ m~__:__ r~ .... :.., .... .4 the Florida Department of Transpo~ation. Policy 12.3 ~he-Collier ~oumj ....... v ................. ~, ~. e, ~-~ shall be the managing authority of the Collier Area Transit System (CATS). Policy 12.4: The County shall, in recognition that the potential for public transit service between Bonita Springs in Lee County and Naples exists, consider any intergovernmental efforts necessary. Policy 12.5: The County shall participate in the MPO planning process through an interlocal agreement with the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island, and in a Joint Participation Agreement with the FDOT. Policy 12.6: The County will participate in the MPO planning process ~' ~ .................. ~ ........................ as a voting presence on the MPO Board and the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Policy 12.7: Following the adoption of any transit development plan, the County shall initiate the development of transit right-of-way and corridor protection strategies, including ordinances and policy additions. Policy 12.8: Any adopted transit development plan shall include an acceptable level of service standard for transit facilities. 23 Words ctruckthrcugh are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) Policy 12.9 The County shall include capital expenditures for any adopted transit development plan in the Capital Improvement Element. Policy 12.10 The County shall incorporate herein by reference the most recent Public Transportation Development Plan and Public Transit Operating Plan adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. on Aug~ast 2, ~ ,mn 24 Words -* .... ~'*~' ..... ~' are deletions -Words underlined are additions Rd CR 858 lmmokalee Rd ~8- Lanes Water Bodies Interstate Highway US Highway' 25 TR- 2 COLLIER COUNTY 2025 LONG RANGE NEEDS PLAN Rd CR 858 C. 2 - Lanes N4 - Lanes 8 - Lanes ~' Interchanges Water Bodies Interstate Highwas, Roads US Highway County Boundary. 0 2 4 rrl 26 8B TR- 3 COLLIER COUNTY FUNCTIONAL CLASS MAP MAJOR AIR POR'i"8 RAILROAD I~US ROUTES FUTURE ROADWAY MINOR ARTERIAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR tJRBAN COLLJ~CTOR 0 2 4 8 12 16 ~ ~ Miles STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2002-60 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 19th day of November, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 25th day of November, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex-officio to Board of County C.omm'is,s ioners "j,. ~'~iV C$',,,"'., ,.. ,, ~ ~... . -~ ... By: ~ -P~t~t~L. ~ ~gan, -..,,,<~,. ......... .. ~: ,,- COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: [] Normal legal Advertisement (Display Adv., location, etc.) x Other: See A~ached r8C Originating Dept/Div: Planning Services Person: Marcia Kendall Date: October 16, 2002 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): PROPOSED FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 2 Petitioner: (Name & Address): Comprehensive Planning Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before xx BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement a~ng 4 consecutive weeks_b.e.J_qre~) November 19, 2002. ~ed:_(Complete onlyif important): - - - -- - x Naples Daily News [] Other [] Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size): See Attached Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? xx Yes [] No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 111-138317-649100-00000 ~l~ivision Head Approved by: County Manager Date List Attachments: Legal Ad DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ON~Y: / ORDINANCE NO. 02- AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 2; DESCRIBING THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; NAMING THE INITIAL MEMBERS OF THE DISTRICT'S BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; NAMING THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, DY Land Associates Ltd., has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners (Board) of Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, to establish the FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT # 2 (District); and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, after proper published notice has conducted a public hearing on the petition and determined the following with respect to the factors to be considered in Section 190.005(1)(e), as required by Section 190.005(2)(c), Florida Statutes: The petition is complete in that it meets the requirements of Sections 190.005 (1)(e)2., and 190.005(2)(a), Florida Statutes; and all statements contained within the petition are true and correct. Establishment of the District on the land proposed in the petition is not inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the local comprehensive plan of Collier County, known as the Collier County Growth Management Plan, or the State Comprehensive Plan. The proposed area of land within the District is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. The District is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be serviced by the District. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. The area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate special-district government; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of this State, as provided for in Section 190.002 (2) (c), Florida Statutes, that the exercise by any independent district of its powers as set forth by uniform general law comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations, and policies governing planning and permitting of the development to be serviced by the district, to ensure that neither the establishment nor operation of such district is a development order under chapter 380 and that the district so established does not have any zoning or permitting powers governing development; and WHEREAS, Section 190.004 (3), Florida Statutes, provides that all governmental planning, environmental, and land development laws, regulations, and ordinances apply to all development of the land within a community development district. Community development districts do not have the power of a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan, building code, or land development code, as those terms are defined in the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. A district shall take no action which is inconsistent with applicable comprehensive plans, ordinances, or regulations of the applicable local general-purpose government; and 8 g WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 190.012, Florida Statutes, upon the establishment of the proposed community development district, the District Board of Supervisors will have the right to seek consent from Collier County for the grant of authority to exercise special powers without question as to the continued right, authority and power to exercise its limited powers as established by this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: AUTHORITY FOR ORDINANCE. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Section 190.005 (2), Florida Statutes, and applicable provisions of law governing county ordinances. Whereas clauses are deemed to be true and correct and are adopted as additional authority as if fully, and, set forth herein. Lastly, the State created charter for the District is recognized as Sections 190.006 through 109.041, Florida Statutes. SECTION TWO: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT # 2. The Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 is hereby established within the boundaries of the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION THREE: DESIGNATION OF INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS. The following five persons are herewith designated to be the initial members of the Board of Supervisors: 1. Rhea Riegalhaupt 3. 6001 Pelican Bay Boulevard, #1206 Naples, FL 34108 Randy Byrnes 2587 Half Moon Walk Naples, FL 34102 2. Arthur Woodward 4. 1136 Edington Place Marco Island, FL 34145 George Schmelzle 1119 Augusta Falls Way Naples, FL 34119-1362 Clifford (Chip) Olson 1020 Goodlette Road, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34102 SECTION FOUR: DISTRICT NAME. The community development district herein established shall henceforth be known as the "Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2." SECTION FIVE: STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISTRICT. The Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 shall be governed by the provisions of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and all other applicable general and local law. SECTION SIX: CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 will be duly and legally authorized to exist and exercise all of its general and special powers as limited by law; and has the right to seek consent from the Collier County Board of County Commissioners for the grant of authority to exercise special powers in accordance with Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes, without question as to the district's continued right, authority and power to exercise its limited powers as established by this Ordinance. The District Board's authority to exercise special powers may include the power to plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate, and maintain additional systems and facilities for: (i) parks and facilities for indoor.and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational 2 uses; and (ii) security, including, but not limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion-detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies; except that the District may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general-purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District boundaries; all as authorized and described by Section 190.012 (2)(a) through (d), Florida Statutes. SECTION SEVEN: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION EIGHT: INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or any other appropriate word. SECTION NINE: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this __ day of ,2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK , Deputy Clerk BY: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to Form And Legal Sufficiency PATRICK G. WHITE, Assistant County Attorney 8 C = October 16, 2002 Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced notice and map on Sunday, October 20, Sunday, October 27, Sunday, November 3, and Sunday, November 10, 2002. and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. The advertisement should be no less than one-quarter page and the headline in the advertisement should be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement should not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: Account 111-138317-649100 November 19, 2002 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing AdvertisinR Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Sunday, October 20, Sunday, October 27, Sunday, November 3, and Sunday, November 10, 2002 and furnish proof of publication to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 334104. The advertisement should be no less than one-quarter page and the headline in the advertisement should be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement should not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board") hereby gives notice to the citizens of Collier County that a public heating shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, at 9:00 a.m., in the Commission Board Room, 3rd Floor Building "F", Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, November 19, 2002. The subject of the Public Heating is the filing with the County of a petition by DY Land Associates Ltd., for the establishment by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, of a Community Development District form of local government. The district government would serve an area of land in Collier County generally described as follows: The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida. The proposed district covers approximately 999 acres of land. The site is located in portions of Sections 11, 13, and 14, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, and Section 18, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, as depicted below. LOCATION MAP Such community development district government is a way to provide infrastructure subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State of Florida and Collier County governing any existing or future lawful use and development of the land described above, and specifically governing the planning, implementation, maintenance and financing of basic community facilities, systems and services which may be required of any such development consistent with principles of concurrency, comprehensive planning and development permitting. On September 5, 2002, DY Land Associates Ltd. officially submitted and filed its petition to Collier County, along with the application-processing fee of $15,000.00 for review by the County. The Board will comply with Section 190.005(1)(c), Florida Statutes., in conducting this Public Heating. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition as submitted by DY Land Associates Ltd. to the six factors listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier County will adopt an ordinance establishing the Community Development District. According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the economic consequences of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida and its citizens; Collier County and its citizens; the present property owners; and the future property owners. A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including an explanation of its computations and determinations, is available for review, along with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at the Office of the County Clerk, Collier County, 3301 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida. Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property to be serviced by the proposed district, are also on file at the Collier County Planning Services Department, Comprehensive Planning Section at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. All interested persons are invited to attend. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) PUBLIC HEARING/GH/11/19/02 October 20, 27, November 3, & 10, 2002 DY Land Associates Ltd. E S.R. 951 COLLIER BOULEVARD FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 2 950 Encore Way Naples, FL. 34110 Phone: (941) 254-2000 Florida Cerflflcafe of AufhoHzation No.1772 DISTRICT 2 LOCATION MAP ICHECKE~ BY: I PROJECT No. W.T.C./~.~. I 98.70 I DRA~N ~~ I CDD2 EX-1 8C ""t ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 190.005(2), FLORIDA STATUTES, TO ESTABLISH ON THE PROPOSED PROPERTY THE FDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #2 / PETITION FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DY Land Associates Ltd., ("Petitioner"), by and through its undersigned attorney petitions the BOARD OF 'COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ("Commission") to adopt an ordinance establishing on proposed property a uniform community development district pursuant to the Uniform Community Development District Act of Florida, Section 190, Florida Statutes, (1997), as amended, and to designate the proposed land area within which the District may manage and fmance basic infi:astmcture, systems, facilities and services. In support thereof, Petitioner submits: 1. Petitioner, DY Land Associates Ltd. is a limited partnership Company for which Fiddler's Creek LLC is the Managing Member with its principal place of business at 3470 Club Center Blvd., Naples, FL 34114-0816 and whose Agent is Mark P. Strain. 2. The land area proposed to be served by the District is in Collier County. The land area is bounded on the north by agricultural, residential and roadway; the south by future residential and agricultural; on the east by residential and agxiculmral; and the west by residential, agricultural and pubhc school; and comprises approximately 998.794 contiguous acres. A map showing the location of the land area to be serviced by the District is attached as Exhibit "1". 3. A metes and bounds legal description of the external boundaries of the District is attached as Exhibit "2". Pursuant to section 190.005(1)(a), FS., an approximately 10 acre parcel is not owned by the Petitioner and is within the external boundaries of the District; the impact of the District on this property is not adverse. 4. Attached as Exhibit "3" is documentation constituting written consent to the establishment of the District by the owners of 100% of the real property to be included in the land to be serviced by the District. 5. The five (5) persons designated to serve as the initial members of the Board of Supervisors of the District, who shall serve in that office until replaced by elected members, as provided in Section 190.006, Florida Statutes, are: (1) whose address is: (2) whose address is: 3) whose address is: (4) whose address is: (5) whose address is: Rhea Riegelhaupt 6001 Pelican Bay Blvd.; Unit 1206; Naples, Fl. 34108 Arthur Woodward 1136 Edington Place, Marco Island; Florida 34145 Clifford (Chip) Olson 1020 Goodlette Rd.; Suite 200; Naples, F1 34102 Randy Byrnes 2587 Half Moon Walk; Naples, Fl. 34102 George Schmelzle 1119 Augusta Falls Way; Naples, Fl. 34119-1362 2 6. The name of the District is the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2. 7. A map of the District showing current major trunk water mains and sewer interceptors, utilities and outfalls, if any, is attached as Exhibit "4". 8. The proposed timetables and estimate of related costs of construction and provision of District services and facilities which are contemplated by Petitioners and which may be proposed to the District Board of Supervisors, based upon available data and which are subject to change, is attached as Exhibit "5". 9. Collier County has adopted all mandatory elements of its Local Government Comprehensive Plan known as the Collier Comprehensive Plan, found in County Ordinance No."89- 05", as amended, in accordance with requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985, as amended in 1986, and Collier County has completed its revised plan for minimum criterion review pursuant to Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, by Ordinance No."92-34" and "95-12", as amended, currently in effect. A copy of the entire Collier Comprehensive Plan, as amended, is within the possession of Collier County and its staff and a copy of only the future land use page is attached as Exhibit "6." 10. A Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs of the granting by the Commission of this Petition, and the establishment of the District pursuant thereto, in accordance with section 190.005(1), Florida Statutes, and Rule 42-l. 008(l)(c), Florida Administrative Code, is attached as Exhibit "7". 11. Petitioner attaches, as Exhibit "8" to this Petition, discussions by qualified engineers and planners providing information for use by the Collier County and its staff in consideration of the six 3 factors for establishment of the District on the proposed property, and in support of the Commission granting this Petition, and as additional materials in support of the statements in this Petition, alleges (with the sequence discussed logically with factor No. 4 considered last): A. The Petition hereby affirms that all of the statements contained herein are tree and correct, in compliance with sections 190.005(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)1., FS. (See Exhibit "8"). B. As according to the Future Land Use element of the Plan, the future land use designation for the land area proposed to be included in the District is "urban coastal fringe sub- district". (See Exhibit "8"). The District, if established on the proposed property, would not be inconsistent (and in fact, is consistent) with the Plan. For a further discussion on these matters and related applicable Plan matters and also the State Comprehensive Plan, please reference Exhibit "8". See s. 190.005(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)2., F.S. C. The land area proposed to be included within the state-created and chartered District is comprised of approximately 998.794 contiguous acres which are of sufficient size, sufficiently compact and contiguous sufficiently to be developable as one functional, interrelated community as discussed in Exhibit "8". See s. 190.005(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)3., FS. D. The community development systems, facilities and services to be provided by the District on the proposed property will supplement, and will not in any way be incompatible with, existing roads and other local and regional community development systems, facilities and services on the proposed property. This matter is described further in Exhibit "8". See s. 190.005(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)5., FS. E. The area proposed to be served by the District is amenable to separate special 4 district government in the light of the information to be considered regarding the other factors. This matter is described further in Exhibit "8". See s. 190.005(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)6, F.S. F. Because the information in the Petition is true and correct; because establishment is not inconsistent with applicable local or state comprehensive plans; because the land area is of sufficient size and compactness, and is contiguous sufficiently, to be developable as one functional interrelated community; because the systems, facilities and services of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development systems, facilities and services; because the land area proposed to be served by the District is amenable to separate special district government; and because, if established on the proposed property, following the procedures in s. 190.005(2), F.S., the District will constitute under s. 190.002(1)(b), F.S. a mechanism for timely, efficient, effective, responsive and economic delivery of its systems, facilities and services; the District is, therefore, the best alternative available for delivering these systems, facilities and services to the proposed property in light of the services, systems and facilities which would be provided otherwise as discussed in more detail in Exhibit "8". See s. 190.005(2)(a), FS., 190.005(1)(e)4, F.S. 12. Petitioner acknowledges certain legal and policy points regarding the Collier County Water-Sewer District and related matters, as set forth in the official Acknowledgment attached to the Petition as Exhibit "9", and incorporated herein. Petitioner contemplates a petition by the District, once established, to obtain consent of the Commission as provided by Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes, to exercise some or all the powers provided therein. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests the Commission respectfully to: A. Direct its staffto notice, as soon as practicable, a local public non-emergency and information- gathering and ordinance-enactment hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.005(2)(c), Florida Statutes, on the subject of whether to grant the petition for the establishment of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2, and to enact the ordinance to establish the District, on the proposed property. B. Grant the petition and adopt the ordinance to establish the District; designate the land area to be served by the District; designate the name of the District; designate the initial Board of Supervisors of the District; recognize the impending petition to allow the District to exercise powers under Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes; and finally provide that, with regard to any future specific consent by the county to exercise any other powers which may be authorized by general law, the legal existence and authority of the District shall have already been decided by this ordinance. Respectfully submitted this 30th day of August, 2002. Agent;Fiddler's CreekVLLC.,~ 3470 Club Center Blvd/'] Naples, FL 34114-0~16/ I~za l[an As ~ en'd ~~/'¢~ Yofing, van Assenderp & V~d-nadoe, P.A. 225 S. Adams Street, Suite 200 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (850) 222-7206 Fla. Bar No. 158829 Attorneys for Petitioner. 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY a c. opy of the foregoing was fumished this 30th day of August, 2002, by Federal Express to DAVID C. WEIGEL, Collier County Attorney, Collier County Attomey's Office, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112 and ItEIDI ASHTON~llier County // Attomey's Office, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples~ //~~ ~ ~ K/~ZA VASN ~r~'~END~ ¥6ung, van Assenderp, ~arnadoe, and Anderson, P.A. 225 S. Adams Street, Suite 200 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (850) 222-7206 Fla. Bar No. 158829 Attorney for Petitioner K:\UsersLKfolden~FIDDLERS CREEK~Petition to establish.wpd S.R. 951 COLLIER BOULEVARD F~MIBIT "1" FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 2 950 Encore Way Naples, FL ;~4110 Phone: (941) 254-2000 FlOrida Cerflflcafe of Aufhorlzoflon No.1772 DISTRICT 2 LOCATION MAP ICHECKED BY: I PROJECT W.T.C./F.F. 98.70 CDD2 EX-1 Exhibit "3-A" LANDOWNER'S CONSENT TO ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT GB Peninsula Ltd, by and' through its general partner, GB Peninsula, Inc., a Florida corporation, with its principal place of business at 3470 Club Center Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34114-0816, is the owner or. controller of certain property located in Collier County and more particularly described as follows: See Exhibits "1" & "2" of the "Petition to Establish the Fiddler's Creek #2 Community Development District" incorporated herein by reference. By signing below GB Peninsula, Ltd., as owner, or controller of 100% of the proposed land as set forth on Exhibit" "to be included in the FIDDLER'S CREEK #2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ("District"), as evidenced in the deed records of Collier County and/or as evidenced by documentation attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, hereby gives full consent to the establishment of the District by Collier County ordinance in accordance with section 190.005, Florida Statutes, and consents to the inclusion of its property within the proposed boundaries of said District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this I r~ qL day of ~'Cc~v-e_-., 2002. GB Peninsula, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership By: GB Peninsula, Inc., a Florida corporation, its general partner F and not STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 ~5'X'day of ~"bt~,.~_. 2002, by Aubrey J. Ferrao, President of GB Peninsula, Inc., as general partner of GB Peninsula, Ltd. Personally known ~(~ Produced Identification __ Type of Identification Produced Notar~ Public My commission expires: Exhibit "3-C" LANDOWNER'S CONSENT TO ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT DY Land Associates, Ltd., by and through its authorized representative, Aubrey J. Ferrao, attorney-in-fact, with its principal place of business at 3470 Club Center Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34114-0816, is the owner or controller of certain property located in Collier County and more particularly described as follows: See Exhibits "1" & "2" of the "Petition to Establish the Fiddler's Creek #2 Community Development District" incorporated herein by reference. By signing below DY Land Associates, Ltd., as owner, or controller of 100% of the proposed land set forth on Exhibit" "to be included in the FIDDLER'S CREEK #2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ("District"), as evidenced in the deed records of Collier County and/or as evidenced by documentation attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, hereby gives full consent to the establishment of the District by Collier County ordinance in accordance with section 190.005, Florida Statutes, and consents to the inclusion of its property within the proposed boundaries of said District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this I Q'~x. day of ~0,~'~_~ , 2002. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER DY Land Associates, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership ~// 1T t, and nolqndividualfy, pursuant to that Power of Attorney and Appointment of Attorney-in-Fact, recorded in O.R. Book '5oH9.., Page 27t%.7, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ 2002, by Aubrey J. Ferrao, attorney-in-fact. Personally Known ~( Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced My commissioner expires: Exhibit "3-C" LANDOWNER'S CONSENT TO ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT 951 Land Holdings, Ltd., by and through its authorized representative, Aubrey J. Ferrao, attorney-in-fact, with its principal place of business at 3470 Club Center Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34114-0816, is the owner or controller of certain property located in Collier County and more particularly described as follows: See Exhibits "1" & "2" of the "Petition to Establish the Fiddler's Creek #2 Community Development District" incorporated herein by reference. By signing below 951 Land Holdings, Ltd., as owner, or controller of 100% of the proposed land set forth on Exhibit" "to be included in the FIDDLER'S CREEK #2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ("District"), as evidenced in the deed records of Collier County and/or as evidenced by documentation attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, hereby gives full consent to the establishment of the District by Collier County ordinance in accordance with section 190.005, Florida Statutes, and consents to the inclusion of its property within the proposed boundaries of said District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this Iq day of ~ , 2002. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 951 Land Holdings, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership By: Q/'~ Aubre~ J. Ferra~, attorney-in-fact, andflot individu~illy, pursuant to that Power of Attorney and Appointment of Attorney-in-Fact, recorded in O.R. Book 2863, Page 26, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2002, by Aubrey J. Ferrao, attorney-in-fact. day of ~,,r, Personally Known ~ Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced NM0;~o~mPmUib~is~ner expires' E~IBIT "4" FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~5o £.¢o~. woy ~ ~g Facilities Naples, FL. 34110 Phone: ('941) 254-2000 within Proposed Floflda Certificate of Authorlzetlon N0.1772 District 2 DISTRICT 2 W.T.C./F.F. ~ aOa I C002 EX-~, ~6/o2 I~"~¥TM o~ u.,l~ O~ T!i35 6 8 U^[;~' COUN 1'" BRowAr?D COUN1 Y EXHIBIT "6-A" Future Land Use Map Provided By: Collier County Graphics Department STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 2 8O 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Introduction Purpose and Scope This statement of estimated regulatory costs ("SERC") supports the petition to form the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 2 ("District"). The District comprises approximately 999 acres of land on which 2,087 dwelling units are planned for development. The District would provide infrastructure and community services to the District as described more fully below. The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section 190.002(2)(d), F.S. (governing District establishment) as follows: "That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law shall be fair and based only on factors material to rear, aging and financing the service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerning permitting or plannine, of the development i$ not material or relevant (emphasis added)." Overview of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 2 The District provides community infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and maintenance, to a portion of the Fiddler's Creek community ("Development") under development by Gulf Bay ("Developer"). Fiddler's Creek is a luxury, master planned, community consisting of over 2,000 acres. The Development includes golf courses, clubhouses, a beach club, marina and yacht center, and other amenities designed to serve a community of more than 3,000 dwelling units. The State established the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 1 to serve a portion of the Development that is nearing its full development. District 2 will serve the next area in the Development with infrastructure and community services. Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Section 120.541(2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory costs must contain: "(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the rule. (b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. (c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional costs" are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practices, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring and reporting. (d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. Orange City is not defined as a small City for purposes of this requirement. (e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful. (f) In the statement or revised statement, whichever applies, a description of any good faith written proposal submitted under paragraph (1) (a) and either a statement adopting the alternative or a statement of the reasons for rejecting the alternative in favor of the proposed rule." 2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance. As noted above, the District will provide infrastructure and community services to a portion of the Development comprising approximately 2,087 dwelling units covering some 999 acres. All of the ultimate property owners in the District will be required to comply with District rules and their properties will be encumbered with District obligations to pay for infrastructure and operations and maintenance expenses incurred by the District to the special benefit of the property. Of course prior to the sell out of the real estate all of the undeveloped land owned by the Developer and any other landowner will also be under the jurisdiction of the District. 3.0 3.1 Good faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance State Governmental Entities The cost to State entities to review or enforce the proposed ordinance will be very modest. Since the District comprises less than 1,000 acres, Collier County is the reviewing agency for the petition. There are only modest additional ongoing costs to various State entities to implement and enforce the proposed ordinance. If established, the District, a special purpose unit of local government, will function. The District is required to file various reports to the State of Florida, the Department of Community Affairs and other agencies of the State. The filing requirements are outlined in Appendix A. The cost to the State and its various departments to process additional reports filed by the District will be very small since the State already collects these reports from numerous other units of government. The addition of one more set of reports will have very little cost impact. Finally, the District must pay a small annual filing fee to the Department of Community Affairs to help offset the costs to the State from the additional paperwork. Collier County The proposal for form the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 2 will require the County to review the petition and its supporting exhibits. In addition, the County may choose to hold a public hearing to discuss the petition and to take public input. These activities will absorb staff time and time of the County Commission. However, these costs are very modest at most for the following reasons. First, the review of this petition to establish the District does not include an analysis of the Development itself. In fact, such a review of the Project is prohibited by statute. Second, the petition contains all of the information necessary for its review. Third, Collier County already has all of the staff necessary to review the petition. Fourth, no capital costs are involved in the review. Fifth, Collier County routinely processes similar petitions for land use and zoning changes that are far more complicated than this petition to form the District. Finally, the filing fee will offset these costs. Collier County will incur only a small additional annual cost if this petition is approved. The District would be an independent unit of local government, so the District is responsible for its own budget, reporting, and the full conduct of its powers within its boundaries. The District will provide the County with its budget each year, but no County action is required. 3.2 4.0 Impact on State and Local Revenues Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or local revenues. The District is an independent unit of local government. It is designed to provide community facilities and services to serve the development. It has its own sources of revenue. No State or local subsidies are required or expected. In this regard it is important to note that any debt obligations incurred by the CDD to construct its infrastructure, or for any other reason, are not debts of the State of Florida or any unit of local government. By State law debts of the CDD are strictly its own responsibility. A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the ordinance. The Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 2 will provide various community facilities and services to the property in the District, as outlined in Table 1. The District may fund, own, operate and maintain all of the community's infrastructure facilities except for the utility system. Once constructed the water distribution system and the waste water collection system will be dedicated to Collier County's utility system. Table 1. Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 2 Community Development Proposed Facilities and Services FACILITY FUNDED O&M BY OWNERSHIP BY Roads CDD CDD CDD Streetlights CDD CDD CDD Drainage CDD CDD CDD Water/Sewer Utilities CDD County County Landscape CDD CDD CDD The petitioner has estimated the costs for providing the capital facilities outlined in Table 1. The cost estimates are shown in Table 2 below. Total costs for these facilities are estimated to be approximately $68,441,000. To fund this construction program the District may issue special assessment or other revenue bonds estimated to total $90,000,000. These would be repaid through non-ad valorem assessments levied on all properties in the District that may receive 4 ,8C ' special benefit from the District's capital improvement program as outlined in Table 2. Table 2. Summary of Estimated Capital Costs for Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 2 Construction Schedule 2003 2004 2005 2007 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 TOTALS Roadway Utilities Earthwork & Clearing Stormwater Management Roadway Lighting Landscaping Security Wetland Mitigation & Monitoring Off-Site Improvements Contingencies $3,001,000 $764,000 $3,114,000 $899,000 $9,562,000 $6,104,000 $702,000 $807,000 $427,000 $168,000 $2,650,000 $1,453,000 $0 $368,000 $73,000 $41,000 $0 $374,000 $1,953,000 $1,098,000 $1,828~000 $2,971,000 $7,111O0O $542 000 $408 000 $3,736 000 $368 000 $49 000 $374 000 $1,739,000 $2,008,000 $7,601,000 $1,845,000 $8,829,000 $7,762,000 $30,539,000 $512,000 $2,563,000 $321,000 $1,324,000 $1,817,000 $9,656,000 $0 $736,000 $59,000 $222,000 $0 $748,000 $1,433,000 $6,223,000 GRAND TOTALS $21,482,000 $12,076,000 $19,126,000 $15,757,000 $68,441,000 Prospective future landowners in the District may be required to pay non-ad valorem assessments levied by the District to' provide special benefit to the property from infrastructure and to secure the debt incurred through bond issuance. In addition to the levy of non-ad valorem assessments for debt service, the District may also levy a non-ad valorem assessment to fund the operations and maintenance of the District and its facilities and services which provide special benefit to the property. It is important to note that the various costs outlined in Table 2 are typical for developments of the type contemplated here. In other words, there is nothing peculiar about the District's infrastructure management and related financing that requires additional infrastructure over and above what would normally be needed. Therefore, these costs are not in addition to normal development costs. Instead, the facilities and services provided by the District are substituting in part for developer-provided infrastructure and facilities. Along these same lines, District-imposed assessments for operations and maintenance costs are similar to what would be charged in any event by a property owners association common to most master panned developments. Real estate markets are quite efficient, because buyers and renters evaluate all of the costs and benefits associated with various alternative locations. Therefore, market forces preclude developers from marking up the prices of their products beyond what the competition allows. To remain competitive the operations and maintenance charges must also be in line with the competition. Furthermore, locating in the District by new residents is completely voluntary. So, ultimately, all owners and users of the affected property choose to accept the District's costs in tradeoff for the benefits that the District provides. The District is an alternative means to manage necessary community services with related financing capability. District financing is no more expensive, and often less expensive, than the alternatives of a municipal service benefit unit (MSBU), a neighborhood association, County provision (directly or via a dependent special district), or through developer-bank loans. 5.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. There will be no impact on small businesses because of the establishment of the proposed District. If anything, the impact may be positive. This is because the District must competitively bid certain of its contracts. This affords small businesses the opportunity to bid on District work. The development is located in Collier County. As of the latest Census date, the 2000 Census, Collier County has a population of more than 75,000. Therefore, the proposed District is not located in a county defined as a "small" according to Section 120.52, F.S. 6.0 Any additional useful information. The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits. Inputs were received from the Developer's Engineer and other professionals associated with the Developer. Finally, it is useful to reflect upon the question of whether the establishment of of the District is the best alternative to provide community facilities and services to the Development. As an alternative to the District, the County could approve a dependent special district for the area, such as an MSBU or a special taxing district under Chapter 170, F.S. Either of these alternatives could finance the improvements contemplated in Table 2 in a fashion similar to the proposed District. However, in the case of establishing the District this would be awkward at best. This is because the area to be served is adjacent to the existing Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 1, and the land in the District is a part of the overall Fiddler's Creek Development. Furthermore, unlike the District the alternatives would require the County to continue to administer the project and its facilities and services. As a result, the costs for these services and facilities would not be sequestered to the land directly benefiting from them, as the case would be with the District. Administering a project of the size and scale contemplated herein would make little sense. A District also is preferable from a government accountability perspective. With a District as proposed, residents and renters in the District would have a focused unit of government under their direct control. The District can then be more responsive to resident needs without disrupting other County responsibilities. Another alternative to the District would be for the developer to provide the infrastructure and to use a property owners association (POA) for operations and maintenance of community facilities and services. A District is superior to a POA for a variety of reasons. First, unlike a POA a District can levy and arrange for collection of its assessments along with other property taxes. Therefore, the District is far more assured of obtaining its needed funds than is a POA. Second, the District is a unit of local government. Therefore, unlike the POA the District must abide by all other governmental rules and regulations. Fishkind & Associates certifies that this SERC meets the requirements for a SERC as set out in Chapter 120.541, F.S. We have developed over 25 SERCs. Below is a listing of some of these. · Urban Orlando Community Development District · Marshall Creek Community Development District · Cedar Hammock Community Development District · Meditera Community Development District · Brooks Community Development District · Pelican Marsh Community Development District · Pelican Landing Community Development District · Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 1 APPENDIX A LIST OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS REPORT Annual Financial Audit Annual Financial Report (AFR) TRIM Compliance Report Form I - Limited Financial Disclosure Public Depositor Proposed Budget Public Facilities Report Public Meetings Schedule Bond Report Registered Agent FLORIDA STATUTE CITE 11.45 218.32 200.068 112.3144 215 218.34 189.415 189.417 218.38 189.417 DATE 12 months after end of fiscal year by March 31 130 days after by July 1 by November 15 by September 1 March 1 beginning of fiscal year When issued 30 Days after FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 2 Engineering Considerations Establishment of Fiddler' s Creek Community Development District 2 My name is W. Terry Cole. By profession I am a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Florida. Attached is my resume. My job is to raise and discuss engineering aspects and consequences of proposed new community development projects in general, and the various alternatives for the delivery of basic infrastructure to community developments. This includes the use of the specialized governmental entities known as Community Development Districts for the provision of basic infrastructure. Regarding the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 2 which would provide infrastructure to the Fiddler's Creek Development, I have assisted in the preparation of the Petition, its required exhibits, and additional information pertinent to the engineering consequences of establishing the District. This document constitutes a summary of the engineering consequences of establishing the District on the identified property in the County. The general law which creates the charter of the District requires information which must be contained in all petitions, as required in the uniform establishment procedure set forth in Section 190.005, Florida Statutes. The Petition with its attachments establishes initial information on the record and triggers the process which results in an ordinance establishing the District on the legally described property, pursuant to Section 190.005(1)(a), Florida Statutes. The Statute then requires pertinent information as to the six factors which must be considered by the Petitioner, the County W:\2002\200203oq(WHITEPAPER)CDDs - Engineering Considerations Revised August 27, 2002.doc 1 District Processing Team, and, ultimately, the members of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County in establishing the District, pursuant to Section 190.005(1)(e)1-6, Florida Statutes. This document addresses the engineering aspects of not only the information in the Petition and its exhibits, but also the information related to consideration of the six statutory factors. I have reviewed the engineering consequences of establishing this District with the assumption, for the edification of the County staff and elected officials, that the District would exercise all of the systems, facilities, and services it is empowered to provide as basic infrastructure to the Community development under both subsection (c) and (2) of Section '190.012, Florida Statutes. After reviewing the Petition and its exhibits, I used the six factors as a guide for my engineering analysis in order to determine whether a particular problem specific to Collier County and the District is identified. I have also anticipated questions and concerns oriented specifically toward Collier County near the end of this document. FACTOR ONE Regarding creation and establishment of the District, my duties were to inspect the site within Collier County where the District is to be set up. I also helped prepare the Petition and its attachments from an engineering perspective. In my opinion, as an engineer, the Petition and its attached exhibits are true and correct. Special Problems No special engineering problems were evident during my review. FACTOR TWO W:\2002~2002036\(WH1TEPAPER)CDDs - Engineering Considerations Revised August 27, 2002.doc 2 Although not directly my responsibility because I am not a planner, I have reviewed the State Comprehensive Plan from an engineering perspective. I have found nothing in the State Comprehensive Plan with which creation and establishment of the proposed District would be inconsistent. Furthermore, I have reviewed the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and have determined there is nothing with which creation and establishment of this District would be inconsistent. My work assumes for analysis purposes that the District, on this property in Collier County, will exercise any and all of its special powers as set forth in its charter, Section 190.006-190.041, Florida Statutes. I have also used the six factors in Section 190.005(1)(e) 1-6, Florida Statutes, in the light of all the District's special powers to determine whether any specialized problems presently exist on this property in Collier County, or will evolve from the creation and establishment of the District. Currently, the Petitioner proposes to ask the Board of Supervisors of the District, once established, to provide certain specialized systems, facilities and services as basic infrastructure to the community development. However, once again, I have reviewed establishment of this District, from an engineering perspective, on the assumption that the district will exercise all of its powers under Section 190.012(1) and (2), Florida Statutes. Preliminary to all of my work, I have reviewed the actual physical property to be included within the District. Regarding enclaves, I note that Franklin and Judith Baker own a 10.9 acre parcel of vacant land located at 299 Creative Drive, Naples, Florida. Special Problems: W:\2002\2002036\(WHITEPAPER)CDDs - Engineering Considerations Revised August 27, 2002.doc 3 No special engineering problems were evident during my review. FACTOR THREE Having reviewed the property, in the light of the special powers available to the District, I then considered statutory Factor Three, which deals with whether the area of land within the District is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. From an engineering perspective, a "community" is a residential, commercial or industrial community, or a community made up of a combination of uses. It has an infrastructure system which has certain engineering functions. All of these infrastructure systems must be designed and constructed so that their operation does not conflict with other services. These services also interrelate because they are necessary in combination to provide for the health, welfare, benefit, and enjoyment to the service users within the community. The term "functionally interrelated community," from an engineering perspective, means a community which provides systems, facilities and services in a consistent, reliable, and cost effective manner. The size of the land area is important in order to determine whether the proposed community development can functionally interrelate, from an engineering viewpoint. Having reviewed the size of the land area in question, I have determined that it is 999 acres, more or less. This acreage, in my professional opinion, is of sufficient size, even with the small enclave, to provide for a functionally interrelated community development, which could be serviced by a Community Development District. From an engineering viewpoint, the word "compactness" means the lands within the W:\2002\2002036\(WHITEPAPER)CDDs - Engineering Considerations Revised August 27, 2002.doc 4 community are situated such that the systems, facilities, and services can be provided in a functional and cost effective manner. In reviewing the land area for the proposed community development, I have determined that it is sufficiently compact because based on my experience with similar development, the community systems, facilities, and services can be provided in a functional and cost effective manner. As an engineer, I understand the term "contiguous" to mean adjacent and abutting. After analyzing the proposed layout of the community, it is my opinion that the land area of the District is sufficiently contiguous to have its systems functionally interrelate in an economical manner. In my opinion, reviewing the land area involved, I determine that it is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact and is sufficiently contiguous to function as an interrelated community development itself. Special Problems: No special engineering problems were evident during my review. W:\2002\2002036X(WHITEPAPER)CDDs - Engineering Considerations Revised August 27, 2002.doc 5 FACTOR FOUR It is now logical to review Factor Four. To determine if there are any reasons why establishing the District constitutes needless proliferation of government services, it must be considered if it will be the best alternative to provide the required and desired services, systems and facilities to the proposed land area on which the District is to exist. There are three major public and private alternatives for the provisions of infrastructure systems, facilities, and services to proposed functionally interrelated community developments. Purely private alternatives include a developer and a homeowner's association. The first public alternative is a Community Development District. The other public alternatives include the County, County management with financing by a Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) or Municipal Service Benefit Unit (MSBU), County management and financing by dependent special districts, and other regional and local independent districts. In reviewing these alternatives for the particular land area in question in Collier County, I reviewed the availability of existing services, the effort and cost required to extend service to the community development, the cost of providing daily service, and the long term level of management and maintenance required for the systems, facilities and services. From an engineering perspective, although Collier County has decided under most circumstances to provide water, sewer, and irrigation services through a dependent district, or the County has not determined to provide other infrastructure to community developments. The County is not, in my opinion, the best alternative to provide those other systems, facilities and services from an engineering viewpoint for the following reasons: · The County has not master planned, designed, nor funded those other systems, W:\2002\2002036~(WHITEPAPER)CDDs - Engineering Considerations Revised August 27, 2002.doc 6 facilities, and services. The single, special purpose of the District is to design, build, fund, and operate those other systems, facilities, and services. · The County because it is a general purpose local government has to deal with legitimate counter pressures that do not enable it to focus sufficient time to infrastructure management for the Fiddler's Creek Development. · The County decision making and implementation timeframe is normally short-term, measured by four (4) year pre-election cycles. Regarding the private developer, any private company, or a homeowner's association as an alternative way to provide the remaining systems, facilities and services, I note as an engineer, that there are a number of disadvantages including: · The private developer may not have the funds to provide or complete the remaining systems, facilities, and services. · The private developer may only have short-term concerns and become distracted without long-term maintenance requirements. As a result, the developer may lack accountability. · The homeowner's association may not adequately plan for the long term maintenance and replacement of the systems, facilities, and services and they are generally non- professional and amateurish in regard to these issues. Accordingly, the best alternative for this property, in my opinion as a professional engineer dealing with infrastructure provisions for the community development project is the District itself. The basis for this opinion is my experience as a civil engineer working in Collier County and dealing with Collier County Government and the private development W:\2002\2002036~(WHITEPAPER)CDDs - Engineering Considerations Revised August 27, 2002.doc 7 r8C community on a daily basis. The District is a pinpointed, focused responsive and accountable form of public management by specialized single-purpose local government. Special Problems: No special engineering problems were evident during my review. FACTOR FIVE Factor Five should be considered next. It deals with whether the District would be incompatible with any community development systems, facilities or services, either existing or authorized. From an engineering perspective, I understand the term "community development services or facilities" to mean those infrastructure providing use, benefit, and enjoyment to the users of the services or facilities. In reviewing the site, I have determined that the community development services and facilities of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. Regarding the District proposed facilities, systems and services, I view the term "compatibility," as an engineer, to mean the District provide facilities, systems, and services can be integrated into adjacent existing facilities, systems, and services without significant loss of function or economy. In my opinion, creation and establishment of the District and its proposed systems and facilities will not be incompatible with all of the existing or future authorized local and regional W:\2002\2002036\(WHITEPAPER)CDDs - Engineering Considerations Revised August 27, 2002.doc 8 systems, facilities and services. There will not be an overlap or duplication of services. The services provided by the District will augment and improve those provided by Collier County and its special districts. Special Problems: No special engineering problems were evident during my review. FACTOR SIX Factor Six is addressed next. It deals with whether the land area to be serviced by the District is amenable to special district governance. Having determined, by applying the information relevant and material to Factor Three, that the land area is of sufficient size, sufficiently compact and sufficiently contiguous to be a functional interrelated community development, the question now arises whether the land area and its community development are serviceable by Community Development District. The Statute uses the term "amenable." From an engineering perspective, this term means the area can be adequately and economically served by the District provided systems, facilities or services. The key factor is to determine if there are economies of scale by providing the required and desired services through a Community Development District. Is the land area too small to obtain the benefits of a District event though it is not too small to be permitted as a new community? The answer is that since the land area, based on the proposed layout of the community, is sufficiently compact and contiguous to efficiently provide services, its size does not limit or render it incapable of providing significant economies of scale when governed by a special district. In my opinion the land area in the District is amenable because of its size and the proposed layout of the community. Also, there are no existing WA2002k2002036\(WHITEPAPER)CDDs - Engineering Considerations Revised August 27, 2002.doc 9 or proposed land features, facilities, encumbrances or restrictions that would make the services and special capabihties of the District difficult or inefficient to provide. Special Problems: No special engineering problems were evident during my review. This document has been prepared by: W. Terr~Cole, P.E. #42347 Fiddler's Creek CDD District Engineer Kfoldent\CDDs - Enghaeering Considerations.May 14, 2002 W:\2002X2002036~(WHITEPAPER)CDDs - Engineering Considerations Revised August 27, 2002.doc 10 FIDDLER'S CREEK C:DD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #2 TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL REDD, PLANNER Planning Considerations Establishment of Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 Work Experience My name is Michael Redd. I am President of Michael Redd & Associates and as a registered landscape architect in the State of Florida have 33 years of experience in governmental relations involving planning and land development. Primarily this expertise is focused on the subspecialties of golf course community master planning, park and recreation design and city and new town planning. The associated approval processes and financing alternatives, including the establishment of Community Development Districts (CDD), have been a significant part of my practice. I have been called as an expert witness with respect to large-scale (over 500 acres) community design. This encompasses in-depth knowledge in all facets of land use planning and site design, including physical, economic, social and political implications. I have a Bachelor of Landscape Architecture from the University of Georgia and have performed Post Graduate Work at the Graduate School of Design at Harvard University and the University of Virginia. I have represented numerous governmental entities in community design and planning, including the cities of North Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Palm Beach Gardens, Palm Beach County, The State of South Carolina, as well as the countries of France, the Czech Republic, and the United Arab Emirates. Page 1 of 32 \~Server\workfiles~PROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2\fiddlerscreek_cdd2_final.doc MICHAEL R_EDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 r8O I have served on the Editorial Board for the Urban Land Institute's book, Residential Streets, and have had by-lined articles published in Urban Land and Landscape Architect magazines. I am currently writing a reference book on Land Planning. I will address the planning aspects and consequences of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 on the proposed property based on the above mentioned training and professional experiences. I was responsible for the creation of the Fiddler's Creek Master Plan, assisted in the establishment of Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #1, and the petition and its exhibits for the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2. This paper contains an overview of the planning consequences relating to the establishment of Community Development District on the proposed land area in Colliers County from a planner's perspective. The Community Development Project Which The Community Development District will serve: Though not material, relevant, or pertinent to the establishment of a Community Development District, Fiddler's Creek is an existing 3921-acre Master Planned community located in Collier County. The District if established will be the second Community Development District in the community and is composed of 999 acres. It is bound by: future sections of Fiddler's Creek to the east, the existing and established Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #1 to the west, U.S. 41 to the north, and future sections of Fiddler's Creek to the south. The District will be composed of approximately: 71 acres of public right-of-way, 451 acres of residential use, 8 acres of retail and business services, and 36 acres of recreation Page 2 of 32 MICHAEL. R.EDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. \\Server\workfiles~PROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2~fiddlerscreek_cdd2_final.doc Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 facilities. These recreation facilities including a golf academy, tennis center, and golf club will provide for a variety of community events and activities. The District will also include a variety of outdoor facilities and natural environments totaling approximately 433 acres. This land operates as developed parks, golf courses, a hiker/biker trail system as well as natural areas including lakes, wetlands, conservation areas, and general open space. The community development proposed for the land area of the Community Development District is a composition of discrete neighborhoods oriented off of a system of no-load boulevards. This produces a scenic and private environment while continuing to provide functioning and efficient services to the variety of market segments developed in the community. The Master Plan, which provides this diverse assortment of housing types, ensures a level of social-economic mixing in the community. This variety of housing products and the complimenting land uses are made cohesive through the use of design guidelines, which direct landscaping, signage, utility services, stormwater management, and community services in a manner consistent with local and state regulations. The Six Statutory Factors: Section 190.005(1) (C) 1-6, F.S. The law generally mandates a level of redundancy in the documentation materials submitted for the establishment of a Chapter 190, F.S. District. There are legal and practical reasons for redundancy in the establishment of a Community Development District. From a legal point of view, should an action of the District be challenged, the first avenue of investigation is to determine if the District was established using the authority contained in the Florida statutes. Page 3 of 32 \\Ser~er\workfiles~PROJECT~FIDI~RK\CDD\CDD2~ ddlerscreek_cd d2_fin al. doc MICHAEL R. EDD &. ASSOCIATES, PA. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 Redundancy in the documentation, which supports the petition to establish the Community Development District, will minimize the exposure of Collier County and the District under this avenue of investigation. From a practical standpoint, redundancy of the six factors set forth in the statute can help to identify information and problems which can then be considered by the District Board of Supervisors after the District is established or by Collier County and the District Review Team during the petition process. The following consideration of the six factors is performed from a planning perspective so that those involved in the establishment of the District can consider the six factors as they pertain to the establishment of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 on the proposed land area. It is important to note that the Community Development District set forth in 190, Florida Statutes, has already been created upon the adoption of the statute by the Florida Legislature. Since the District has already been created, this document and the discussion and consideration of the six factors is to be used by the county and petitioner to consider the proposed land area for the establishment of a Community Development District based on the following six factors. Factor One: Whether all statements contained within the petition have been true and correct. In my professional opinion from the perspective of a professional planner, the petition and its exhibits meet the requirements of 190, F.S. The information provided is both true and correct and therefore factor one is satisfied in my opinion from a planning perspective. Page 4 of 32 \\Server\workfiles~PROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2\fiddlerscreek_cdd2_final. doc MICHAEL EEDD & A55OCI^'FrS, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 ~ 8 C Factor Two: Whether the establishment of the District is inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or the effective local government comprehensive plan. I have done a considerable amount of analysis of both the State Comprehensive Plan and the Collier County Comprehensive plan. This analysis was performed because factor two seeks information on whether the creation by law and establishment pursuant to law of the District on the proposed land area is inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the State Comprehensive Plan or the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. Discussion: The State Comprehensive Plan The State Comprehensive Plan is set forth in Chapter 187, Florida Statutes. I have analyzed the State Plan upon the assumption that the District will exercise all of its systems, facilities and services and related specialized powers set forth in its state created uniform charter of the District, Sections 190.006 through 190.041, Florida Statutes. As a methodology, I looked at all 26 subjects, 26 goals and several related policies under each goal in the State Plan from the following perspective. First, I eliminated all subjects, goals and policies of the State Plan that related neither to the development itself, nor the establishment of the District to serve the development. Further, I rejected any goals, subjects and policies that related only to the development and land use projects. As a result, I identify certain remaining Page 5 of 32 \\Scrvcr\workfiles~ROJEC'IXFIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2\fiddlerscreek_cdd2_final. doc MICHAEL REDD & A&SOCIATES, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 subjects, goals and policies, and was able to review and evaluate them, as they related, in my opinion, to the establishment of a Community Development District. Using this methodology, I have determined that four goals and related policies actually apply to the subject of this petition, the establishment of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2. I have analyzed each of these subjects and goals and then identified various specific policies under which they are related to the District. I applied all of these factors to the assumption that the District would exercise on the particular property in Collier County all of its specialized powers in subsections (1) and (2) of Section 190.012, Florida Statutes. Subject and Goal 16 (16)LAND USE - (a) Goal - In recognition of the importance of preserving the natural resources and enhancing the quality of life of the state, development shall be directed to those areas, which have in place, or have agreements to provide, the land and water resources, fiscal abilities, and service capacity to accommodate growth in an environmentally acceptable manner. First, Subject Number 16 and its related goal apply because the subject of development being directed to areas having, or programmed to have funded land, water resources, and service capacity to serve growth in an environmentally responsible manner. This relates directly to the District's purpose of fiscal responsibility and adequate service supply through District provided Page 6 of 32 MICHAEL REDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. \~Server\worlcfiles~PROJECT~IDDCRK\CDD\CDD2\fiddlerscreek_cdd2_fmal.doc Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 infrastructure improvements. I have determined that establishment of the District on the proposed land area would not be inconsistent with this goal and subject because Chapter 190, F.S., found that services provided by a .District can be "...a timely, effective, responsive and economic...' means of accommodating development demands "...without overburdening other governments and their taxpayers." Local Specialized Problem: None. Policy 16 (b) 1. Promote state programs, investments, and development and redevelopment activities, which encourage efficient development and occur in areas which will have the capacity to service new population and commerce. Regarding policy 16(b) 1, establishment of the District is not inconsistent because Chapter 190, F.S., requires efficiency and responsibility in the utilization of District powers in providing services to supply development demand. In fact, the establishment of the District would be the promotion of a state program and will have the capacity to service new population and commerce. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 16(b) 2. Develop a system of incentives and disincentives, which encourage separation of urban and rural land uses while protecting water supplies, resource development, and fish and wildlife habitats. Page 7 of 32 \\Server\workfiles~PROJEC'l~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2\fiddlerscreek_cdd2_final.doc MICHAEL KEDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 Regarding policy 16(b) 2, District establishment is a state legislative program which, when the District is established by the county, is required by law to provide service capacity in areas designated for urban services, and to provide such services in an environmentally sensitive manner. Establishing the District on the proposed property will follow this law and the approved Fiddler's Creek Master Plan, which addresses development in an environmentally sensitive manner and therefore is not inconsistent with policy 16(b) 2 of Chapter 187, F.S. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 16(b) 5. Encourage and assist local governments in establishing comprehensive impact-review procedures to evaluate the effects of significant development activities in their jurisdictions. Based on the fact that the District, when established, must report annually on such facilities using comprehensive impact review procedures set forth in Section 189.415, F.S., it is not inconsistent with Policy 16(b) 5 of Chapter 187, F.S. Furthermore, these reports can be use by Collier County to update the capitol improvement and future land use sections of their Plan. Local Specialized Problems: None Subject and Goal 18 Page 8 of 32 \~Scrver\workfflcsXPROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2~ ddlerscreek_cdd2_f'mal, doc MICHAEL KF_DD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 (18)PUBLIC FACILITIES (a) Goal - Florida shah protect the substantial investments in public facilities that already exist and shall plan and provide for and finance new facilities to serve residents in a timely, orderly, and efficient manner. I determined that Subject 18 and its related Goal would be directly implemented through the establishment of the District through the responsible provision of services and facilities when needed. The establishment of the District will also be more responsive to changing market demands and trends. Based on that determination, the District would not be inconsistent with this subject and goal. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 18(b) 3. Allocate the costs of new public facilities on the basis of the benefits received by the existing and future residents. Facilities and services provided by the District will be paid for by those whose property benefits from those facilities and services through assessments and use fees and will have no impact the Collier County budget or taxpayers outside the District. I therefore find that the District on the proposed property will implement policy 18(b) 3, and therefore, in my opinion, is consistent with the policy. Local Specialized Problems: None Page 9 of 32 \\Server\workfiles~PROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2X~fiddlerscreek_cdd2_fm al.doc MICHAEL R. EDD & ASSOCIATES, PA. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 Policy 18(b) 4. Create a partnership among state government, local governments, and the private sector, which would identify and build the needed public facilities and allocate the costs of such facilities among the partners in proportion to the benefits accruing to each of them. In regard to Policy 18(b) 4, the District is in fact a partnership between and coinciding the interest of State government, local government, and the private sector. Given that a District's charge is to utilize its statutory powers for the provision of infrastructure only in conformance with local and state regulations, the establishment of the District is not inconsistent with this policy. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 18(b) 5. Encourage local government self-sufficiency in providing public facilities. In regard to Policy 18(b) 5, the District, if established, would be a single and special purpose local government, and would be self-sufficient in the provision of infrastructure systems, services and facilities, given that it would not draw upon other County resources. This is possible through the taxation and assessment of those living and owning businesses in the District. Thus, the establishment of the District would not be inconsistent with this policy. Local Specialized Problems: None Page 10 of 32 \~Server~workfiles~PROJECTWIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2X~fiddlerscreek_cdd2_final.doc MICHAEL ILEDD & ASSOCIATES, Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 Policy 18(b) 6. Identify and implement innovative but fiscally sound and cost-effective techniques for financing public facilities. The establishment of the District is, in my opinion, the manifestation of Policy 18(b) 6's intent, whereby the District is an innovative means of providing fiscally sound and cost effective service and facility improvements. The establishment of the District is not inconsistent with this policy. Further, the District, when established, being a special purpose local government, would have limited powers to design, fund, and construct services and facilities necessary to accommodate the project's facility and service demand. It will coordinate with Collier County the connection to its capital facilities especially under section 189.415 (2) (6), Florida Statute. The District is not inconsistent with this policy. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 18(b) 7. Encourage that development, use, and coordination of capital improvement plans by all levels of government. Given that the District, when established, is subject to the reporting provisions of Section 189.415, Florida Statutes, which in paragraph (6) states, "For purposes of the preparation or revision of local government comprehensive plans required pursuant to Section 163.3161, a District public facilities report may be used and relived upon by the local general purpose government or governments within which the special District is located." The District on the Page 11 of 32 MICHAEL KEDD & ASSOCIATES, P~,. Copyright © 2002 \\S crvcr\worlffiles~PROJEC'r~lDDCRK\CDD\CDD2\fiddlerscreek_cdd2_fin al. doc FIDDLER'S CREEK C:DD #2 C:OLL1ER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/0:) proposed land area, if established, will implement this policy statement, and is therefore consistent. Local Specialized Problems: None Subject and Goal 21 (21) GOVERNMENTAL EFFICIENCY (a) Goal - Florida governments shall economically and efficiently provide the amount and quality of services required by the public. Subject 21 deals with Government Efficiency and it, along with its goal applies because of the statutory finding that a District is a means to deliver services and facilities in a timely, efficient and cost effective manner. The District is not inconsistent with Goal 21 from Chapter 187, Florida Statutes. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 21(b) 1. Encourage greater cooperation between, among, and within all levels of Florida government through the use of appropriate inter-local agreements and mutual participation for mutual benefit. Page 12 of 32 \\Server\workfiles~PROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2Lfiddlerscreek._cdd2._final. do c MICHAEL R. EDD & ASSOCIATES, PA. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 The Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2, when established, is a separate special-purpose local government of the proposed property, with the state granted authority to provide public services and facilities within a limited land area. As a local government, the District has the ability to enter into inter-local agreements with mutual participation for the benefits to the land and residents within the District, and the rest of the County. Given that any action on the part of the District cannot be inconsistent with any portion of Collier County's Comprehensive Plan, both governments will be operating within the parameters of the Comprehensive Plan. This leads to communication and coordination between the levels of government, which provides a mutual benefit for both the County and District. The District, in my opinion, implements this policy and is therefore consistent. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 21Co) 2. Allow the creation of independent special taxing districts, which have uniform general law standards and procedures and do not overburden other governments and their taxpayers while preventing the proliferation of independent special taxing districts, which do not meet these standards. Policy 21(b) 2 captures the intent of why Community Development Districts are an important and integral state created component in the delivery of infrastructure, community facilities, and services through management and financing. A Community Development District has uniform general law standards as specified by the State Statute, which created it. It obtains funding through the sale of bonds, which are repaid by the people whose property directly Page 13 of 32 MICHAEL R. EDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A, \~Scrvcr~workfiles~PROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2~fiddlerscreek_cdd2_final.doc Copyright ~} 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 80 receive the special benefits of the services and facilities that the District provides, and does not burden the general taxpayer with obligations to pay for services and facilities inside the District boundaries. Chapter 190, F.S., Districts are created by law and established pursuant to the laws specific general factors specified. Therefore the establishment of this type of District on the proposed land area is consistent with the policy not to allow the proliferation of independent taxing districts, which do not have those specific general law powers and do not implement state law and growth management policy. The District would serve to implement this policy, and in my opinion, is consistent. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 21(b) 5. Eliminate needless duplication of, and promote cooperation in, governmental activities between, among, and within state, regional, county, city, and other governmental units. As stated previously, a District is statutorily required to report as to operation and demand on its facilities pursuant to Section 189.415, F.S., which Collier County may utilize in its Annual Update and Inventory Report pursuant to its Comprehensive Plan. This, along with a District's charge to operate in conformance with local, regional and state growth management requirements, including the State mandated Intergovernmental Coordination Element's inter- Page 14 of 32 \\Scrver\workfilcs~PROIECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2Xfiddl erscreek_cdd2_final .doc MICHAEL KF. DD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright O 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 local agreements, proves, in my opinion, that the District would not be inconsistent with Policy 21¢)5. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 21(b) 9. Encourage greater efficiency and economy at all levels of government through adoption and implementation of effective record management, information management, and evaluation procedures. Information and records analysis and management are an operational requirement of Chapter 190, F.S., through record keeping, disclosure, and government-in-the-sunshine. This, in my opinion, effectively implements the call for efficiency in govermnent set forth in Policy 21 (b) 9, thereby, in my opinion, making a District consistent with that policy. Local Specialized Problems: None Subject and Goal 26 (26) PLAN IMPLEMENTATION (a) Goal- Systematic planning capabilities shah be integrated into all levels of government in Florida with particular emphasis on improving intergovernmental coordination and maximizing citizen involvement. Page 15 of 32 \\Server\workfilesXPROJECT~IDDCRK\CDD\CDD2~fiddlerscreek_cdd2_final.doc MICHAEL KEDD & ASSOCIATF_S, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 Subject No. 26 addresses plan implementation. Its related goal sets forth that systematic planning capabilities shall be integrated into all levels of government in Florida, with particular emphasis on improving intergovernmental coordination and maximizing citizen involvement. As stated previously, a District has a statutory mandate to report information concerning District operations. Further, a District being a special purpose local government must advertise its regularly scheduled meetings, ensuring public commenting opportunity. The District if established, in my opinion, is consistent with this goal and would implement it. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 26(b) 2. Ensure that every level of government has the appropriate operational authority to implement the policy directives established in the plan. By virtue of the fact that a District established pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, must not be inconsistent with any applicable portion of the State Comprehensive Plan, a District is granted the operation authority to implement policies of the Plan. The District is not inconsistent with Policy 26(b) 2. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 26(b) 3. Establish effective monitoring, incentive, and enforcement capabilities to see that the requirements established by regulatory programs are met. Page 16 of 32 \~S erver~worlcfilesXPROJECT~IDDCRK\CDD\CDD2kfiddlerscreek_cdd2_final.doc MICHAEL R.EDD &. ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright ~) 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22102 8C Policy 26(b) 3 calls for measures to assure that the regulatory programs are adhered to. District is not exempted from and as mentioned is subject to reporting to any applicable local, regional or state growth management regulatory programs, thus the Fiddler's~Creek Community Development District #2 on the proposed land area is not inconsistent with this policy. Local Specialized Problems: None Policy 26(b) 8. Encourage the continual cooperation among communities, which have a unique natural area, irrespective of political boundaries, to bring the private and public sectors together for establishing an orderly, environmentally, and economically sound plan for future needs and growth. The District is required to operate in the sunshine, encouraging public participation, and as stated previously, reporting of the District's facilities and services states to the County govemment provides a mechanism for cooperation between the general purpose and special purpose governments. A District, in my opinion, not only is consistent with Policy 26(b) 8, it implements the policy. Local Specialized Problems: None Caveat Page 17 of 32 \~ServeflworkfilesLPROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2~fiddl erscreek_cdd2_fin al .doc MICHAEL KEDD & ASSOCIATES, Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 I have also reviewed all the subjects, goals, and policies which I have determined do not apply to the District, and it is my professional opinion that establishment of the District is therefore, not inconsistent with any of those subjects, goals and related policies. When considering management and financing of all the basic infrastructure systems, facilities, and services that the District by law is authorized to provide. It is my opinion from a planning perspective, that the creation and establishment of the District is not inconsistent with any subject, goal and policy of the State Comprehensive Plan, as amended. Discussion: The Collier County Comprehensive Plan The Collier County Local Government Comprehensive Plan set forth in Collier County Ordinance No. 2000-31, as amended. This plan is currently effective in Collier County. Under the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Act, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, as amended, the plan consists of several elements, sub-elements, and components. These include required and recommended topics of Chapter 163, Part II, of the Florida Statutes. As a methodology I applied each of the available powers of a Community Development District under all of Section 190.012, Florida Statutes to each and every element, sub element, component, and other aspect of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. This allowed me to determine from a planning perspective whether there is any particular inconsistency between Page 18 of 32 \~Servefiworkfiles~PROJECTh~IDDCRK\CDD\CDD2kfiddlerscreek_edd2_fmal.doc MICHAEL KEDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright ~) 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 Collier County Comprehensive Plan and the establishment of the state created 190, Florida Statutes, Community Development District. In using this process I was able to make determinations similar to those used for the State Plan. First I eliminated goals, objectives, policies, elements, components, sections, and portions, which do not address creating and establishing the District. Then I also rejected those, which relate strictly to community developments. These subjects are irrelevant to the creation and establishment of the District. After eliminating these topics, I then identified and evaluated the remaining parts of the plan to determine whether the establishment of the District, exercising any and all of its special powers on the proposed property, would be inconsistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. The above-mentioned review of the elements, sub elements, goals, policies, components, and sections of the Collier County Comprehensive plan, calls attention to six topics of discussion either directly or indirectly, when discussing the establishment of the District in Collier County. The establishment of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 to provide infrastructure and a governmental service attendant to the proposed land area of the District complies fully with all elements, sub elements, goals, policies, components, and sections of the Collier County Plan. Further evidence of this can be noted by Collier County's approval of the Fiddler's Creek Master Plan, the PUD application, and Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #1, which is adjacent to the Districts land area and is of similar size, Page 19 of 32 \\Server\workfiles~PROSECT~DDCRK\CDD\CDD2\fiddlers creek_cdd2_final .doc MICHAEL REDD &. ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22102 8 C '~ '~'' compactness, contiguity, and character. The following topics will be discussed to assure that they are not inconsistent with Collier County Plan. Capital Improvements Element, Objective 1.5: To ensure that public facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development, the County's Concurrency Management System shall be consistent Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-5.0055, Florida Administrative Code. The county shall establish a regulatory and monitoring program to ensure the scheduling, funding, and timely construction of Category "A' public facilities concurrent with, or prior to, the issuance of a building permit to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards. This objective was established to assure that infrastructure is in place concurrent to the new needs and demands associated with future residents, services, and facilities. The creation of Community Development Districts by 190, Florida Statutes, was to assure concurrency among other things. The subsequent establishment of the District authorizes it to exercise it's one propose, that is the supply of timely, cost efficient, effective, and responsive infrastructure. The Collier County government has many purposes and the District will ease supply and monitoring burdens in the proposed land area with no effect on the Collier County Fiscal Budget or residents living outside the District. Furthermore, the District is required to be consistent with Collier County Comprehensive Plan and the State Comprehensive Plan and is also required to report once a year on its operations. Collier County to can use this report over see District actions and to assist in the planning of their own capitol improvements and future land uses. Therefore the District is not inconsistent with this objective. Page 20 of 32 \~Server\workfiles~PROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2~fiddlerscreek_cdd2_fmal.doc MICHAEL R. EDD & ASSOCIATES, Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 Local Specialized Problems: None Future Land Use Element, Goal 1: To guide land use decision making so as to achieve and maintain a high quality natural and human environment with a well planned mix of compatible land uses, which promotes the public's health, safety, and welfare consistent with state planning requirements and local desires. As noted, the District's establishment and actions must be consistent with the local and state plan. Therefore development decisions inside the District must be consistent with future land use maps created by Collier County. Furthermore, the Fiddler's Creek Master Plan, which will be developed on the proposed land area of the District, has already been approved and found to be consistent with Collier County's Future Land Use Plan. This proves that the establishment of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 in not inconsistent with this goal. Local Specialized Problems: None Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Objective 1.1: By the time mandated for the adoption of land development regulations pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including and amendments thereto, establish intergovernmental communication and a level of service coordination mechanisms to be used by Collier County, Cities of Everglades and Naples, adjacent counties, the Collier County School Board, the state, and any other entity that provides service but may not have land use authority. Page 21 of 32 \\Scrvcr\workfileskPROJECThCIDDC~\CDD\CDD2~id dl crscreek_cdd2_fmal.doc MICHAEL B. EDD & ASSOCIATES, PA. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 The Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 when established becomes a separate special-purpose local government with the authority to provide public services and facilities within a limited land area. As a local government, the District has the ability to enter into inter-local agreements with mutual participation for the benefits to the land and residents within the District, and the rest of the County. Given that any action on the part of the District cannot be inconsistent with any portion of Collier County's Comprehensive Plan, including the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, both governments will be operating within the parameters of the Comprehensive Plan. This leads to communication and coordination between the levels of government, which provides a mutual benefit for both the County and District. The District, in my opinion, implements this objective and is therefore consistent. Local Specialized Problems: None Potable Water Sub-Element, Policy 1.2.6: Where Community Development Districts, or other similar special districts are established to provide a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or other purposes, wholly or partially within the Collier County Water- Sewer District, water service shall be connected to the regional system, and internal facilities shall be conveyed when acceptable to the Collier County Water-Sewer District for operation and ownership in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 88-76, the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance, adopted September 27, 1988 or its latest revision, and District construction and operation. Page 22 of 32 \\Server\workfiles~ROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2X~fid dl erscreek_cdd2_fmal.do¢ MICHAEL R. EDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 The establishment and actions of the District must be consistent with the Collier County Plan. Any water services shall be connected to the regional system, and internal facilities shall be conveyed, when acceptable to the Collier County Water-Sewer District for operation and ownership pursuant an inter-local agreement between the District and Collier County Water- Sewer District. Therefore the District would not be inconsistent with this policy. Local Specialized Problems: None Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, 1.1.7: Where Community Development Districts, or similar special districts are established to provide a tool for developers to finance infra-structure or other purposes, wholly or partially within the Collier County Water-Sewer District, sewer service will be connected to the regional system, and all facilities shall be conveyed, when acceptable, to the Collier County Water-Sewer District for operation and ownership in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 88-76; the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance, adopted September 27, 1988 or its latest revision, and District construction and operating policies. The establishment and actions of the District must be consistent with the Collier County Plan. Any water services shall be connected to the regional system, and internal facilities shall be conveyed, when acceptable to the Collier County Water-Sewer District for operation and ownership pursuant an inter-local agreement between the District and Collier County Water- Sewer District. Therefore the District would not be inconsistent with this policy. Page 23 of 32 \\Scrvcr\workfilcskPROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2kfid diets creek_cdd2_fmal, doc MICHAEL KEDD &. ASSOCIATES, P~. Copydght © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK C:DD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 Local Specialized Problems: None Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, Policy 1.4.5: Where Community Development Districts, or other similar special districts are established to provide a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or other purposes, wholly or partially within the Collier County Water-Sewer District, and where such Districts make provisions for irrigation via dual systems utilizing effluent and/or other irrigation sources, said systems shall be connected to the regional system when available, and all internal irrigation systems shall remain in private ownership and master metered by the County. The establishment and actions of the District must be consistent with the Collier County Plan. Any irrigation via dual system utilizing effluent and/or other irrigation sources, said system shall be connected to the regional system when available, and all internal irrigation systems shall remain in private ownership and master metered by the county. Therefore the District would not be inconsistent with this policy. Local Specialized Problems: None Caveat Having thoroughly reviewed the Collier County Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the establishment of a Community Development District pursuant Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, I have found that the District is not inconsistent with any elements, sub elements, goals, policies, Page 24 of 32 \\Server\workfiles~PROJECTLglDDCRK\CDD\CDD2\fiddl erscreek_cdd2_fin al. doc MICHAEL R. EDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 components, or sections, which were found to be applicable to the establishment of a District on the proposed land area. Based upon the aforementioned findings, the establishment of the District would not be inconsistent with any elements, sub elements, goals, policies, components, or sections of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan, even if it were to exercise any and all of its statutory powers. In fact, the District would further the Plan in general, and in many of its specific components. Furthermore, the establishment of the District would not be inconsistent with those parts of the Plan, which were found not related to the establishment of a District. Factor Three: Whether the area of land within the District is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. Before this question is answered it is important to define two key terms pertinent to the discussion of factor three. A "community" from a planning perspective can be defined as a combination of physical and social components, which constitute a living environment. Physical components include land uses and a complete infrastructure system such as roads, drainage, stormwater management, utility systems, recreation, and other facilities and services that lead to the comfort and Page 25 of 32 MICHAEL R. EDD & ASSOCIAIFS, P~. Copyright © 2002 \XServer\workfiles\PROJECr~IDDCRK\CDD\CDD2~fid dlerscreek_cd d2_fmal .doc FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 convenience for residents. Social components include shelter, security, and welfare of the residents. These components combine to form a unifying connection between residents and land uses. A "functionally interrelated community" from a planning perspective is a community whose functions are integrated into a long-range plan that considers growth and the future needs of the community. These needs will require planning and funding sources to accommodate the evolving community. Therefore a functional interrelated community must be able to accommodate growth with infrastructure, which interrelates facilities in an efficient manner, as they are needed in the community. From the definitions outline above it is possible to determine if Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 located in Collier County is of sufficient size, compactness, and contiguity to develop as a functionally interrelated community. The size of the proposed land area for the District is 999 acres. In my opinion from a planning perspective, this is a sufficient size to support a Community Development District because the area is planned in an efficient manner utilizing land to provide a physically and socially self-sustaining environment. Compactness relates to the closeness and density of the parcels within the development. Compactness creates efficiency in the supply of infrastructure and services. Having reviewed the District, in my opinion from a planning perspective, the proposed land area is sufficiently Page 26 of 32 MICHAEL R_EDD & ASSOCIATES, Copyright © 2002 \\Servcr\workfiles~ROJ'ECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2\fiddlerscreck_cdd2_final.doc FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER C:OUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 compact to provide an efficiently operating community. Its boundary does not generate any obstacles and land uses are sufficiently close enough to provide a functionally interrelated community, which accommodates both physical and social aspects of a community. Furthermore, it abuts the existing Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #1, which is of similar compactness and has already been found to be acceptable as a Community Development District. Contiguity relates to pieces of land within a geographic area that are functionally connected in a meaningful manner and compliment the relationship between the adjacent properties. Although contiguous lands are typically physically connected it is not always necessary for properties to be contiguous, as long as it's parts still function cost effectively and efficiently. Regarding enclaves, I note that there is one 10.9-acre parcel of vacant land located at 299 Creative Drive, Naples, Florida. With this in mind the District remains contiguous because it will operate cost effectively and efficiently in the provision of infrastructure. In my opinion from a planning perspective, the proposed land area for the District is contiguous because it is spatially connected and its parts compliment existing and future land uses. Its adjacency to Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #1 also creates contiguity between the District and its surroundings due to its complementing size, compactness, contiguity, and use. This will allow the District to grow as a functional interrelated community which, can respond to changing markets, needs and requirements while providing efficient provision of infrastructure systems, facilities, services, and creates economies of scale. Page 27 of 32 \\Serverkworka'ilcskPROJECTkFIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2kfi ddlerscreek_cdd2_fin al. doc MICHAEL P-dZDD ~ ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 Factor Six: Whether the area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate special-district government. This factor is best examined out of order due to its association with the preceding factors. Before determining whether the District is amenable it will first be important to define two terms for this discussion. The term "separate special-district governance" is best described as governance having limited special functions and powers that can be applied within the District as a legally defined geographic area. Establishment of the District would subject the land to a separate special District government, as previously defined. It would be established by law through a petition or vote by the Board of County Commissioners, with limited special functions and powers to levy taxes or special assessments within the legally defined geographic area. The term "amenable" can be defined to be an appropriateness for accountability or responsible to authority. Having already determined that the proposed land area of the District is of sufficiently sized, compact, and contiguous to operate as a functionally interrelated community, I now as a planner can determine if the land area is amenable to being governed by a Community Development District. This would follow the uniform charter created by and consisting of sections 190.006 through 190.041, Florida Statutes. My review of this subject assumes that the District will exercise any and all of its special powers provided in that charter. Page 28 of 32 \\Scrvcr~workfiles~PROJECT~FIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2\fiddlerscreck_cdd2_final.doc MICHAEL I~EDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 ~" 8C ~ ~ ~ r In my opinion from a planning perspective, the proposed land area is amenable to the District because it is an area where certain services are not available and where they cannot otherwise be extended economically. Also, the land area is large enough to provide an adequate economy of scale and compact enough to provide the services efficiently. Furthermore, residents of the District would benefit physically and socially from the services provided. It will: allow growth to occur as needed, ensures long term growth and planning, and is valuable to planning, construction, and phasing of services in the community. Factor Five: Whether the community development services and facilities of the District will be incompatible with the capacity and users of the existing local and regional community development services and facilities. By legislative mandate, all actions and implementation of any or all of the Districts powers as created by legislature are to and must not be inconsistent with Collier County's plans. This insures compliance with county land development regulations and concurrency requirements. I have reviewed the proposed land area on which the District will be established to determine if there are any regional systems, services, or facilities, which through their existence would be problematic to the function and purpose of the District and have found no such facilities. In fact, the establishment of the District will assure that continued growth follows that of the already approved Fiddler's Creek Master Plan who's construction began under directions of Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #1. Therefore, in my opinion as a planner Page 29 of 32 MICHAEL KEDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. \\Server\workfiles~PROJECTLglDDCRK\CDD\CDD2~fiddlerscreek_cdd2_fmal.doc Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 the establishment of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 creates no problems relating to factor five and ensures that development occurs as planned and approved by Collier County in the proposed land area for the District. Factor Four: Whether the District is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the District. From a planning perspgctive there are three alternative ways to provide basic systems, facilities, and services to the community development on the proposed land area in Collier County. The first is in the private sector using: developer managed improvements, separate private infrastructure contractors, private utility companies, home owners associations, or any combination of these and related private forms of financing. The second is in the public sector using: the county itself, county management and financing through dependent Districts, or county management through the use of County Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTU), or County Municipal Service Benefit Units (MSBU) to finance the management by the county. The third alternative would also be public but through the specialized but limited and single purpose independent Community Development District created by Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, which provides collaboration and coinciding of public and private interest and capabilities. When considering alternative from a planning perspective it is important to consider: whether the alternative offers the highest quality of services and facilities, whether it is able to deliver these facilities in a timely manner and as services and facilities are required, whether its Page 30 of 32 MICHAEL FLEDID & ASSOCIATES, PA. Copydght © 2002 \\Server\workfilcs~PROJECT~IDDCRK\CDD\CDD2~fiddlerscreek_cdd2_final.doc FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 management is responsive over the life of the development, and whether it can obtain and maintain long term financing to facilitate the management benefits. The supply of infrastructure in advance of the impacts of the actual development concurrency is an important consideration. In this regard, it is vital to have an understanding of the community development infrastructure commitments during the master planning process to properly and efficiently phase the construction of the community development facilities. This allows a full utilization of construed facilities before new branches of those facilities are constructed. The statutory District reporting mandates described previously can be utilized by Collier County as a concurrency management mechanism to implement applicable provisions (i.e., Future Land Use Element, Capitol Improvement Element, etc.), of its Growth Management Plan. The Community Development District alternative means of providing community development systems, facilities and services allow for a cooperative concurrency management program between the county general purpose government and the District special purpose local government. Long term and sustained adequacy and efficiency of infrastructure are important, and I note that among the three alternatives the District would more closely and efficiently manage services and facilities given the District's sole responsibility is the community development's infrastructure needs, both immediate and in the long tenn. Further, a District can be more responsive to the residents of the community development and any other affected parties, than can be provided by the alternatives, which either have a broader public accountability, or narrowed interests. Page 31 of 32 \\Server~workfiles~PROJECTtFIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2\fi d die rscreek_cdd2_fmal.doc MICHAEL KEDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Copyright © 2002 FIDDLER'S CREEK CDD #2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Final: 8/22/02 Regarding the important planning principles of long-term implementations and maintenance, I find that among the three alternatives the District's unique operational and management role would provide the community development services and facilities. These would not be otherwise provided for by the alternatives at such a high level of quality, particularly in the long term. Collier County could supply the community development infrastructure, but it does not have the opportunity for phasing flexibility, nor does it have focused attention for monitoring and maintenance, as does the District. This is again due to Collier County's general purpose, where it must be responsive to multiple community development and other special interest, whereas a District created by law and established by county ordinance pursuant to chapter 190, Florida Statutes, has a singular special interest of the community development that it serves. The private installation of the community development infrastructure, while providing quality systems, services and facilities may not have the management and maintenance longevity, particularly when the conununity development is "built-out" and traditionally turned over to homeowners and/or condominium associations which traditionally are only interested in their individual association matters. The Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 on the proposed land area is the most appropriate means of providing community development systems, services and facilities because it is functionally involved in the overall physical master planning of the development. It will: equitably distributing the cost and responsibilities to users of the systems, services, and facilities, provides for long term maintenance, and provides a greater assurance that residents of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 will have a sustained quality of life. Page 32 of 32 MICHAEL KEDD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. \\Server\workfiles~PROJECTLFIDDCRK\CDD\CDD2~fiddlerscreek_cdd2_final.doc Copyright © 2002 Exhibit "9" ACKNOWLEDGMENT The Un/form Community Development District Act of 1980, chapter 190, Florida Statutes (1999 and hereafter except as otherwise noted)("Fla. Stat. hereafter"), restricts and limits expressly the exercise of the state-created District's exercise of its state charter powers. The petitioner acknowledges that the District's Board of Supervisors is bound legally and ethically to exercise its general and special powers subject to, and not inconsistent with, the laws and regulations contained in the Collier County Water-Sewer District Special Act, and any applicable P.U.D., preliminary subdivision plat and/or development order as provided in sections 190.004 and 190.012, Fla. Stat. In light of the statutory restrictions and mandates upon the powers and functions of a community district discussed below, the District will not and cannot diminish the customer base of the Collier County Water-Sewer District. Collier County under its ordinance is the permanent provider of water and sewer service to the development on which the Community Development District will be established. Also, the 1988 Special Act reestablishing the Collier County Water-Sewer District provides in Section 21 that: 1) Collier County can mandate connection to its water and sewer facilities; 2) Collier County can require installation and dedication of water and sewer facilities to the County; and 3) no water and sewer facilities can be built within the water-sewer district unless the Collier County Commissioners sitting as the Water-Sewer District Board gives its consent and approval. The land area which the District will serve is in the jurisdiction of the dependent Collier County Water-Sewer District and is subject therefore to the terms of the 1988 Special Act. The community to be served by the District is also subject to P.U.D. and preliminary subdivision plat. In addition, the land area involved is also subject to Collier County Ordinance No. 98-69, as amended, utility facihties requirements, as well as the state, regional and local comprehensive plans, permitting agencies and all related land development regulations. The Florida Legislature, in section 190.002(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991), has found expressly that the Community Development District is a solution to the management and capital infrastructure financing problems faced by counties. In solving these problems, the Community Development District also provides a method of servicing projected growth without over burdening other local governments and their taxpayers. The Legislature has found the Community Development District, a management entity, is a legitimate solution to infrastructure delivery challengeds. It is also the expressed policy of the legislature that Community Development Districts are " .... a legitimate alternative method available for use by the private and public sectors, as authorized by state law, to manage and finance basic services for community development." s. 190.002(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). This quoted language means that the District is a management tool for both Collier County and the petitioner. This management tool is to be used by both the developer and the county as authorized in chapter 190, Fla. Stat. In section 190.002(1)(b), Fla. Stat., the Legislature has found also that it is in the public interest that "...the operation of such a district and the exercise by the district of its powers be consistent with applicable due process, disclosure, accountability, ethics and government-in-the- sunshine requirements." This law means that no decision of the Board of Supervisors can be made in secret, and that Collier County will be given ample noticed opportunities to monitor the exercise 2 of the Board of Supervisors' special limited management powers, including those dealing with water and sewer services. In other words, this language mandates that the district board of supervisors as a local government works with the Collier County local government. In regard to possible conflicts between general purpose local government laws and actions of this Community Development District local government, the Legislature has stated expressly as its policy that the exercise by the district of its powers "...comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations and policies governing planning and permitting of the development to be serviced by the district to ensure that neither the establishment nor operation of such a district is a development order under chapter 380, Fla. Stat., and that the district so established does not have any zoning or permitting powers governing developments." s. 190.002(2)(c), Fla. Stat. In addition, section 190.003, Fla. Stat., provides that a Community Development District shall function in such a manner "...that all applicable planning and permitting, rules, regulations and policies control the development of the land to be serviced by the District." Even more illustrative of the Legislature's intent is its dispositive language in the "preemptive and sole authority" section of the Uniform Community Development District Act. s. 190.004(3), Fla. Stat. First, the statute states specifically that "...[alii governmental, planning, environmental and land use development laws, regulations and ordinances apply to all development of the land within a Community Development District." Id. Since the Collier County Water-Sewer District Special Act is a law of Florida, it applies to all development within the land to be serviced by the proposed Community Development District. Since "all development" includes by definition utility and other services, the Collier County Water- Sewer District requirements apply to all developments in the applicable land area, even after the establishment of the Community Development District. Ellie J. Hoffman To: Subject: paperrell@naplesnews.com Fiddler's Creek CDD Hi Pam, Please advertise the above referenced notice and map as per the attached. Thanks and have a great vacation. Fiddlers Creek Fiddler's Creek CDD,doc CDD.doc 8C Ellie J. Hoffman From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Wednesday, October 16, 2002 12:23 PM Ellie J. Hoffman Delivered: Fiddler's Creek CDD _1 Fiddler's Creek CDD <<Fiddler's Creek CDD>> Your message To: paperrell@naplesnews.com Subject: Fiddler's Creek CDD Sent: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:26:00 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:22:50 -0400 From: Tim Franklin [mailto:tfranklin@yvvalaw-tal.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:51 PM To: HeathGlenn; white_p Cc: kvanassenderp®yvvalaw-tal.com Subject: Fiddlers 2 Ad Deficiencies ,8C I! Gentlemen: I have just reviewed the proof of the ad which ran on the 20th of October (and which will run again this Sunday the 2th and by which date it must be changed) and it is missing two important legal elements. Namely, per chapter 286, the ad should contain: 1) a standard reference to appellate rights and ensuring that verbatim record is made in compliance with 286.0105, F.S. 2. A standard informational notice to handicapped persons for special accomodations upon two (2) days notice to Collier County in compliance with s. 286.26, F.S. Can someone, preferably you, Pat, Ellie and Mary Jo Brock and get this added/corrected for 10/27, 11/3, 11/10 and 11/17 ads and confirm for me this is done by email or telephone call. I will be out of the office at CLE all day tomorrow but will have Karen Folden call you if I haven't received any messages. Thanks for your prompt attention to this matter. Tim Franklin tfranklin®yvvalaw-tal.com cell phone 850-556-3747 Ellie J. Hoffman From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Heath, Glenn Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:02 AM White, Patrick; 'Tim Franklin'; Kendall, Marcia Brock, Mary; Ellie J. Hoffman RE: Fiddlers Creek #2 CDD Ad Marcia is e'en now in the process of talking to Ellie about this concern (8:59 a.m.). As discussed, we are using the language copied from the Board agenda sheet. Glenn E. Heath, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Section Collier County Board of County Commissioners (239) 403-2323 Fax: (239) 643-6968 ..... Original Message ..... From: white_p Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:48 AM To: 'Tim Franklin'; HeathGlenn Cc: brock m; Ellie J. Hoffman Subject: ~iddlers Creek #2 CDD Ad Importance: High I don't see s. 286.26, F.S., as being applicable to published notices. As to published notices required by s. 190.005 (2) (b), applying (1) (d), F.S., I can't assure you we have ever done that except as to the notices provided as part of the agendas for the actual meeting where the hearing takes place before the BCC. As to time frames for adding this type of text to the ad, I don't know the answer and ask that Ellie or Mary Jo advise if they know. Does your office have a specific form they suggest be used?? Patrick G. White, Esq. Assistant County Attorney Telephone: (239) 659-5709 Facsimile: (239) 659-5720 e-mail: patrickwhite@colliergov.net ..... Original Message ..... From: white_p Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:02 PM To: 'Tim Franklin' Subject: RE: Fiddlers 2 Ad Deficiencies I THOUGHT WE HAD THE FIRST FOR SURE!The other I'll check tomorrow AH-! Patrick G. White, Esq. Assistant County Attorney Telephone: (239) 659-5709 Facsimile: (239) 659-5720 e-mail: patrickwhite®colliergov.net ..... Original Message ..... October 24, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Amended Notice of Public Hearing to Consider the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District Dear Pam: The above-referenced notice and map was sent to you to be advertised on Sunday, October 20, Sunday, October 27, Sunday, November 3, and Sunday, November 10, 2002. The attorney's office is requesting that this ad be advertised also on November 17, 2002. Please note that the verbiage in this ad has been changed. The advertisement should be no less than one-quarter page and the headline in the advertisement should be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement should not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: Account 111-138317-649100 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board") hereby gives notice to the citizens of Collier County that a public heating shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, at 9:00 a.m., in the Commission Board Room, 3ra Floor Building "F", Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, November 19, 2002. The subject of the Public Heating is the filing with the County of a petition by DY Land Associates Ltd., for the establishment by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, of a Community Development District form of local government. The district government would serve an area of land in Collier County generally described as follows: The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida. The proposed district covers approximately 999 acres of land. The site is located in portions of Sections 11, 13, and 14, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, and Section 18, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, as depicted below. LOCATION MAP Such community development district government is a way to provide infrastructure subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State of Florida and Collier County governing any existing or future lawful use and development of the land described above, and specifically governing the planning, implementation, maintenance and financing of basic community facilities, systems and services which may be required of any such development consistent with principles of concurrency, comprehensive planning and development permitting. On September 5, 2002, DY Land Associates Ltd. officially submitted and filed its petition to Collier County, along with the application-processing fee of $15,000.00 for review by the County. The Board will comply with Section 190.005(1)(c), Florida Statutes, in conducting this Public Hearing. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition as submitted by DY Land Associates Ltd. to the six factors listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier County will adopt an ordinance establishing the Community Development District. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, 34112, (239) 774-8380; assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the County Commissioners' Office. According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the economic consequences of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida and its citizens; Collier County and its citizens; the present property owners; and the future property owners. A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including an explanation of its computations and determinations, is available for review, along with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at the Office of the County Clerk, Collier County, 3301 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida. Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property to be serviced by the proposed district, are also on file at the Collier County Planning Services Department, Comprehensive Planning Section at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. All interested persons are invited to attend. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) October 20, 27, November 3, 10 & 17, 2002 DY Land Associates Ltd. PUBLIC HEARING/GH/11 / 19/02 Ellie J. Hoffman To: Subject: paperrell@naplesnews.com Amended Notice re Fiddler's Creek CDD Good Morning, Pam, Attached is the "amended" notice for the above referenced public hearing. Please let me know if the changes can be incorporated into the ad to be run Sunday, Oct. 27th. Thank you and have a great day! Fiddlers Creek Fiddler's Creek CDD.doc CDD.doc Ellie J. Hoffman From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:35 AM Ellie J. Hoffman Delivered: Amended Notice re Fiddler's Creek CDD I Amended Notice m Fiddler's Cr... <<Amended Notice re Fiddler's Creek CDD>> Your message To: paperrell@naplesnews.com Subject: Amended Notice re Fiddler's Creek CDD Sent: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:39:03 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:35:21 -0400 99642578 bce 3xll oct 20 BCC/COTE ZAI_~LL 78 17:03:49 11/16/02 B PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board") hereby gives notice to the citizens of Collier County that a public hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, at 9:00 a.m., in the Commission Board Room, 3rd Floor Building "F", Collier County Government Center, 3301 TamiamioTrail, East, Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, November 19, 2002. The subject of the Public Hearing is the filing with the County of a petition by DY Land Associates Ltd., for the establishment by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, of a Community Development District form o~1 local government. The district government would serve an area of land in Collier County generally described as follows: The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Flodda. The proposed district covers approximately 999 acres of land. The site is located in portions of Sections 11, 13, and 14, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, and section 18, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, as depicted below. Such community development district government is a way to provide infrastructure subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State of Florida and Collier County governing any exisUng or future lawful use and development of the land described above, and specifically governing the planning, implementation, maintenance and financing of basic community facilities, systems and services which may be required of any such development consistent with princil~es of concurrency, comprehensive planning and development permitting. On September 5, 2002, DY Land Associates Ltd. officially submitted and filed its petition to Collier County, along with the application-processing fee of $15,000.00 for review by the County. The Board will comply with Section 190.005(1)(c), Florida Statutes, in conducting this Public Hearing. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition as submitted by DY Land Associates Ltd. to the six factors listed in section 190.005(1}{e}, Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier County will adopt an ordinance establishing the Community Development District. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board wilt need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbaUm record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, 34112, (239) 774-8380; assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the county Commissioners' Office. According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the economic consequences of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida and its citizens; Collier County and its citizens; the present property owners; and the future property owners. A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including an explanation of its computations and determinations, is available for review, along with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at the Office of the County Clerk, Collier County, 3301 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida. Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property to be serviced by the proposed district, are also on file at the Collier County Planning services Department, Comprehensive Planning Section at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. Afl interested persons are invited to attend. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ~ JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By:/st' Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk No. ~J642578 Oct. 20~ 27~ Nov. 3~ 10~ r8C NAPLES I~AILY NEWS Published Daily Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Pu' State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned ti ey set appeared Angela Bryant, serve as the Administrative Ass Naples Daily, a daily newspape: Collier County, Florida; distribt of Florida; that the attached cop~nn in the matter of PUBLIC NOd was published in said newspaper on October 20, 27, November 3 Affiant further says that the said Naple: published at Naples, in said Collier Cour newspaper has heretofore been continum County, Florida; distributed in Collier an each day and has been entered as second office in Naples, in said Collier County · year next preceding the first publicati, advertisement; and affiant further says l promised any person, firm or corpora commission or refund for the purpose of., publication in the said newspaper. ( Sigh~ure of affiani) "~' Swom to and subscribed before ~ n /2~th of November, 2002 ~S~gna~reYf n°tarY Public) -/~ RFCE!VED NOV ~ 5 200~ ORDINANCE NO. 02-63. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 2; DESCRIBING THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; NAMING THE INITIAL MEMBERS OF THE DISTRICT'S BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; NAMING THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, DY Land Associates Ltd., has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners (Board) of Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, to establish the FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT # 2 (District); and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, after proper published notice has conducted a public hearing on the petition and determined the following with respect to the factors to be considered in Section 190.005(1)(e), as required by Section 190.005(2)(c), Florida Statutes: The petition is complete in that it meets the requirements of Sections 190.005 (1)(e)2., and 190.005(2~a), Florida Statutes; and all statements contained within the petition are true and correct. Establishment of the District on the land proposed in the petition is not inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the local comprehensive plan of Collier County, known as the Collier County Growth Management Plan, or the State Comprehensive Plan. The proposed area of land within the District is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. The District is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be serviced by the District. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. o The area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate special-district government; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of this State, as provided for in Section 190.002 (2) (c), Florida Statutes, that the exercise by any independent district of its powers as set forth by uniform general law comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations, and policies governing planning and permitting of the development to be serviced by the district, to ensure that neither the establishment nor operation of such district is a development order under chapter 380 and that the district so established does not have any zoning or permitting powers governing development; and WHEREAS, Section 190.004 (3), Florida Statutes, provides that all governmental planning, environmental, and land development laws, regulations, and ordinances apply to all development of the land within a community development district. Community development districts do not have the power of a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan, building code, or land development code, as those terms are defined in the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. A district shall take no action which is inconsistent with applicable comprehensive plans, ordinances, or regulations of the applicable local general-purpose government; and · WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 190.012, Florida Statutes, upon the establishment of the proposed community development district, the District Board of Supervisors will have the right to seek consent from Collier County for the grant of authority to exercise special powers without question as to the continued right, authority and power to exercise its limited powers as established by this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: AUTHORITY FOR ORDINANCE. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Section 190.005 (2), Florida Statutes, and applicable provisions of law governing county ordinances. Whereas clauses are deemed to be true and correct and are adopted as additional authority as if fully, and, set forth herein. Lastly, the State created charter for the District is recognized as Sections 190.006 through 109.041, Florida Statutes. SECTION TWO: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT # 2. The Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 is hereby established within the boundaries of the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION THREE: DESIGNATION OF INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS. The following five persons are herewith designated to be the initial members of the Board of Supervisors: 1. Rhea Riegalhaupt 3. 6001 Pelican Bay Boulevard, Naples, FL 34108 #1206 Randy Byrnes 2587 Half Moon Walk Naples, FL 34102 2. Arthur Woodward 4. 1136 Edington Place Marco Island, FL 34145 George Schmelzle 1119 Augusta Falls Way Naples, FL 34119-1362 Clifford (Chip) Olson 1020 Goodlette Road, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34102 SECTION FOUR: DISTRICT NAME. The community development district herein established shall henceforth be known as the "Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2." SECTION FIVE: STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISTRICT. The Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 shall be governed by the provisions of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and all other applicable general and local law. SECTION SIX: CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 will be duly and legally authorized to exist and exercise all of its general and special powers as limited by law; and has the right to seek consent from the Collier County Board of County Commissioners for the grant of authority to exercise special powers in accordance with Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes, without question as to the district's continued right, authority and power to exercise its limited powers as established by this Ordinance. The District Board's authority to exercise special powers may include the power to plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate, and maintain additional systems and facilities for: (i) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational 2 uses; and (ii) security, including, but not limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion-detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies; except that the District may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general-purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District boundaries; all as authorized and described by Section 190.012 (2)(a) through (d), Florida Statutes. SECTION SEVEN: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION EIGHT: INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION NINE: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this Iq,~day of ~o~oxbar ,2002. It-lq-O/ , Depmy Clerk Approved as to Form ~d Legal Sufficiency BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAM~S N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN PATRICK G. WHITE, Assistant County Attorney 3 E Exhibit A COLLIER BOULEVARD FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN'~ .. 950 [n_.core_ ..W?_y '[~---'~'~TRI(~T 9 Phol ~--- 1 of 3 --- 2 of 3 3 of 3 OCT 03 ~02 ~2?RM Y V & V P.13/13 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2002-61 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 19th day of November, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 20th day of November, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex-officio to Board of County,,,~ ~m~isaioners By f Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 210 N. University Drive Suite 800 · Coral Springs, Florida 33071 · Telephone: (954) 753-0380 ° Fax: (954) 796-0623 December 10, 2002 Via FEDERAL EXPRESS .~' James Carter Clerk of the Board of County Court 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Jack Gaskins Community Program Administrator Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Dear Mr. Carter and Mr. Gaskins: Pursuant to Chapter 190 F.S. enclosed is a copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 02-61, establishing the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2. As required by the statutes, I am providing a map of the District, the legal description as shown in the Ordinance and Chapter 190 of the Florida Statutes, which will serve as the charter for the District. The District has selected Anthony P. Pires as the District's Registered Agent and his business address, Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, 3200 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34103- 4108 as the District's Registered Office whose telephone number is 239-649-6555. During the next several months the District will undertake the preparation of a capital improvements program which will serve as the basis for the District's public facilities report which will be submitted to each of you upon its completion. Please be advised that the District held its organizational meeting on December 2, 2002 and at that time each Supervisor was provided with the financial disclosure statement and advised to file same with the Supervisor of Elections within 30 days which will satisfy the requirements of Chapter 112 F.S. dealing with financial disclosure. The Board of Supervisors will hold their'meetings for Fiscal Year 2003 on the fourth Wednesday of each month at 9:30 A.M. on January 22, 2003 (Landowners Meeting), February 26, 2003, March 26, 2003, April 23, 2003, May 28, 2003, June 25, 2003, July 23, 2003, August 27, 2003, September 24, 2003 at the Club & Spa at Fiddler's Creek, 3470 Club Center Boulevard, Naples, Florida. Sincerely, James P. Ward Manager enc. ORDINANCE NO. 02-f:u]' ;-: AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBEK 2' DESCRIBING THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE,-,:-- DISTRICT; NAMING THE INITIAL MEMBERS OF THE~.o, DISTRICT'S BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; NAMING TH~2 DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT SEVER. ABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THL CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING A_N EFFECTIVE DAT~. WHEREAS, DY Land Associates Ltd., has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners (Board) of Collier County, F{orida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, to establish the FIDDLER'S CREEK COMIvlUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT # 2 (District); and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, after proper published notice has conducted a public hearing on the petition and determined the following with respect to the factors to be considered in Section 190.005(1)(e), as required by Section 190.005(2)(c), Florida Statutes: The petition is complete in that it meets the requirements of Sections 190.005 (l)(e)2., and 190.005(2)(a), Florida Statutes; and all statements contained within the petition are true and correct. Establishment of thc District on the land proposed in thc petition is not inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the local comprehensive plan of Collier County, known as the Collier County Growth Management Plan, or the State Comprehensive Plan. The proposed area of land within the District is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. The District is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be serviced by the District. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. The area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate special-district government', and WHEREAS, it is the policy of this State, as provided for in Section 190.002 (2) (c), Florida Statutes, that the exercise by any independent district of its powers as set forth by uniform general law comply with ali applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations, and policies governing planning and permitting of the development to be serviced by the district, to ensure that neither the establishment nor operation of such district is a development order under chapter 380 and that the district so established does not have any zoning or permitting powers governing development; and WHEREAS, Section 190.004 (3), Florida Statutes, provides that all governmental planning, environmental, and land development laws, regulations, and ordinances apply to all development of the land within a community development district. Community development districts do not have the power of a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan, building code, or land development code, as those terms are defined in the Local Government Comprehensive Plannin8 nnd Land Development Regulation Act. A district shall take no action which is inconsistent with applicable comprehensive plans, ordinances, or regulations of the applicable local general-purpose government; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 190.012, Florida Statutes, upon the establishment of the proposed community development district, the District Board of Supervisors will have the right to seek consent from Collier County for the grant of authority to exercise special powers without question as to the continued right, authority and power to exercise its limited powers as established by this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: AUTHORITY FOR ORDINANCE. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Section 190.005 (2), Florida Statutes, and applicable provisions of law 8overning county ordinances. Whereas clauses are deemed to be true and correct and are adopted as additional authority as if fully, and, set forth herein. Lastly, the State created charter for the District is recognized as Sections 190.006 through 109.041, Florida Statutes. SECTION TWO: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FIDDLER'S CREEK CONIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT# 2. The Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 is hereby established within the boundaries of the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by. reference herein. SECTION THREE: DESIGNATION OF INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS. The following five persons are herewith designated to be the initial members of the Board of Supervisors: 1. Rhea Riegalhaupt 3. 6001 Pelican Bay Boulevard, #1206 Naples, FL 34108 2. Arthur Woodward 4. 1136 Edington Place Marco Island, FL 34145 Clifford (Chip) Oison 1020 Goodlette Road, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34102 SECTION FOUR: DISTRICT NAME. Randy Byrnes 2587 Half Moon Walk Naples, FL 34102 George Schmelzle 1119 Augusta Fails Way Naples, FL 34119-1362 The community development district herein established shall henceforth be known ns the "Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2." SECTION FIVE: STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISTRICT. The Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 shall be governed by the provisions of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and all other applicable general and local law. SECTION SIX: CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 will be duly and legally authorized to exist and exercise all of its general and special powers as limited by law; and has the right to seek consent from the Collier County Board of County Commissioners for the grant of authority to exercise special powers in accordance with Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes, without question as to the district's continued right, authority and power to exercise its limited powers ns established by this Ordinance. The District Board's authority to exercise special powers may include the power to plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate, and maintain additional systems and facilities for: (i) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational t8C uses; and (ii) security, including but not limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion-detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper guvemmental agencies; except that the District may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local 8enernl-purpose 8overnment agencies for an increased level of such services within the District boundaries; ali as authorized and described by Section 190.012 (2)(a) through (d), Florida Statutes. SECTION SEVEN: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION EIGHT: INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS ~ ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION NINE: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this j°dkday of /k~mJ~- ,2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA II-lq-OZ '~, Deputy Clerk Approved as to Form And Legal Sufficiency PATRICK G. WHITE, Assistant County Attorney This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's Office the .2~ day of ~ 20°~' - ond acknowledgement of that filiog received this ~ dcw Exhibit A --______.__ S.R. 951 COLLIER BOULEVARD ~---...-.._...__. FIDDLER'8 CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN1 HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS. PLANNERS. SURVEYORS 950 Encore Way, Naples, Florida 34110, Phone: 239.254,2000. Fax: 239.254.2099 HM PROJECT #1998070 12/4/2002 REF. DWG. #A-1425 PAGE 1 of 7 FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF SECTIONS 11, 13 AND 14, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND A PORTION OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, ALL IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S.89°55'46"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 13, FOR A DISTANCE OF 4,688.27 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) A 200 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN S.54°21'29"E. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID US 41, FOR A DISTANCE OF 3,793.58 FEET; THENCE RUN S.35°39'17"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 162.92 FEET; THENCE RUN S.34°59'08"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.84 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N.60°09'23"W., A DISTANCE OF 62.84 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 62.84 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25046'26'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 28.03 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.42°43'50"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.27 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.34°57'42"E., A DISTANCE OF 227.26 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 227.26 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44048'54'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 173.26 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.32°37'51"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 177.75 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 201.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42°41'03", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 146.47 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.31°33'56"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 149.91 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.55°58'37"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.63°20'19"W., A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 150.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 83046'36", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 200.30 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.15°13'37"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 219.33 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N.84°53'30"W., A DISTANCE OF 195.23 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 195.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°24'31'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 115.49 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.22°18'46"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 117.25 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44051'40'., SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 152.63 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.17°05'11"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 156.60 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.79°32'28"W., A DISTANCE OF 86.55 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 86.55 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 171048'26'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 172.66 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.83°38'15"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 259.54 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.87°40'45"W., A DISTANCE OF 71.65 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE W:\I998\I998070',E'DD DISTRICT 2\CDD2LEGALDESCRIPTION.doc Naples. Fort Myers · Venice · Englewood r8c HM PROJECT #1998070 12/4/2002 REF. DWG. #A~1425 PAGE 2 of 7 RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 71.65 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71 °17'11", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 83.50 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.33°19'21"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 89.14 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 165.16 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46°05'12'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 129.30 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.45°55'20"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 132.85 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.03 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25°20'31 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 57.05 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.35°33'00"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 57.51 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 47.36 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 99°18'24'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 72.19 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.01°25'57"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 82.08 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.40°59'55"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 213.60 FEET; THENCE RUN S.45°16'50"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 431.07 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.55°14'36"W., A DISTANCE OF 170.96 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 170.96 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°34'50'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 81.50 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.48°32'50"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 82.29 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N.26°29'54"E., A DISTANCE OF 88.78 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 88.78 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°59'05'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 66.49 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.41°30'33"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 68.15 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 80.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58°25'12'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 78.08 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.09°41'35"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 81.57 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 177.90 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°50'15'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 106.51 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.56°19'19"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 108.17 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 115.82 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 111°08'02'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 191.05 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.18°10'25"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 224.65 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 175.68 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°17'07'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 149.28 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.62°32'10"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 154.18 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 149.49 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°07'11'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 112.29 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.70°15'41"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 115.11 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 173.46 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 61°40'49", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 177.85 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.17°21'41"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 186.74 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 128.37 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47°22'28'', W:~.I998\I998070\CDD DISTRICT 2\CDD2LEGALDESCRIPTION.doc HM PROJECT #1998070 12/4/2002 REF. DWG. #A-1425 PAGE 3 of 7 SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 103.14 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.10°12'30"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 106.14 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 95.40 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98°43'38'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 144.78 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.15°28'04"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 164.38 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 38.74 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°38'13'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 26.27 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.45°00'47"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.80 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.65°20'57"W., A DISTANCE OF 120.54 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.54 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°39'08'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 175.82 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.22°10'31"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 197.03 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.20°27'17"E., A DISTANCE OF 303.38 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 303.38 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°57'32'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 120.76 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.58°03'57"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 121.57 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.30°32'45"E., A DISTANCE OF 316.89 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 316.89 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 63°30'54'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 333.58 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.27°41'48"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 351.29 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 135.33 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°31'39'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 121.88 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.22°42'11"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 126.43 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 625.88 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°48'41", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 63.46 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.46°33'39"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.48 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 324.51 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°42'18'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 60.54 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.38°18'10"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.63 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.50 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 80°04'23'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 94.56 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.72°59'12"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 102.72 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 174.24 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 101°10'28'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 269.23 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.62°26'10"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 307.68 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 200.81 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 56°16'10", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 189.38 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.39°59'01"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 197.21 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 196.68 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37°55'19'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 127.81 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.49°09'27"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 130.17 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE W:'~I998\I998070',CDD DISTRICT 2\CDD2LEGALDESCR[PTION.doc r8c HM PROJECT #1998070 12/4/2002 REF. DWG. #A-1425 PAGE 4 of 7 ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.18 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°53'59", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 20.32 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.41°38'47"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.46 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 141.52 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 80°11'31 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 182.30 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.13°00'01 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 198.07 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.62°57'42"W., A DISTANCE OF 221.41 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 221.41 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°10'21 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 39.26 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.21°57'07"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.31 FEET; THENCE RUN N.77°46'12"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 239.43 FEET; THENCE RUN N.88°51'53"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 636.47 FEET; THENCE RUN S.45°53'28"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 58.20 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.66°02'35"W., A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 150.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 119°47'34'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 259.54 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.35°56'21"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 313.62 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.07°24'26"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.73 FEET; THENCE RUN N.71°08'30"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 278.51 FEET; THENCE RUN N.49°32'33"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 115.86 FEET; THENCE RUN N.73°21'57"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 121.18 FEET; THENCE RUN N.47°48'15"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 115.86 FEET; THENCE RUN N.62°56'36"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 260.80 FEET; THENCE RUN S.67°49'42"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.38 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.70°23'14"W., A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 60.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29°33'16", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 30.61 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.34°23'24"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.95 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.49°10'02"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 79.40 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 220.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°47'51", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 64.27 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.40°46'06"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 64.50 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 30.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°48'11 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 23.35 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.09°28'05"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.98 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.13°26'00"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.35 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 95.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 134°11'52", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 175.02 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.53°39'55"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 222.51 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.59°14'09"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 95.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE RUN WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 155.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70°01'59'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 177.88 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.85°44'52"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 189.46 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 260.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°36'21'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 163.30 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.69°02'03"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 166.11 FEET TO THE END OF SAID W:\I998\I998070\CDD DISTRICT 2\CDD2LEGALDESCRIPTION.doc r8c HM PROJECT #1998070 12/4/2002 REF. DWG. #A-1425 PAGE 5 of 7 CURVE; THENCE RUN N.87°20'14"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 76.56 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 30.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 80°17'08'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 38.68 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.47°11'40"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 42.04 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.07°03'06"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 61.34 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 60.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 62031'37'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 62.28 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.38°18'54"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 65.48 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.69°34'43"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 43.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 116044'05`', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 170.29 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.52°03'15"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 203.74 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.55°53'04"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 315.24 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N.23°50'44"W., A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47°56'15'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 56.87 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.42°11'08"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 58.57 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 170.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46°13'15'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 133.45 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.04°53'37"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 137.14 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.28°00'14"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 88.72 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60036'36'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 252.30 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.58°18'32"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 264.46 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.88°36'51"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 147.41 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 60.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 103°58'48", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 94.55 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.39°23'46"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 108.89 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35°43'08'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 122.67 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.05°15'56"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 124.68 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC; OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 135.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47059'49'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 109.81 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.00°52'24"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 113.09 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.24°52'19"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.34 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89°40'18"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 193.51 FEET; THENCE RUN N.13°18'01 "E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.29 FEET; THENCE RUN N.74°11'31"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 69.02 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77°11'31'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 249.53 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.35°35'46"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 269.45 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.03°00'00"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.69 W:\1998~.1998070\CDD DISTRICT 2\CDD2LEGA LDESCR IPTI ON doc ,8O HM PROJECT #1998070 12/4/2002 REF. DWG. #A-1425 PAGE 6 of 7 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91°37'44", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 50.20 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.42°48'52"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.97 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.88°37'44"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 109.05 FEET; THENCE RUN S.84°57'36"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 58.87 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 109°47'15'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 73.63 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.30°03'58"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 86.23 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.24°49'40"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 92.45 FEET; THENCE RUN S.19°45'17"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 120.70 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37°39'13'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 12.91 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.00°55'41"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.14 FEET TO THE END OF SAID; THENCE RUN S.17°53'56"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.67 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 80.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70°28'21'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 92.31 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.17°20'15"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 98.40 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.52°34'25"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.66 FEET; THENCE RUN S.77°39'49"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 931.61 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°25'58"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 2,870.69 FEET; THENCE RUN N.26°57'22"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N.26°57'22"W., A DISTANCE OF 709.89 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 709.89 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15023'22'', SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 190.10 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.70°44'19"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 190.68 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE AND TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE RUN N.00°26'31"W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13, FOR A DISTANCE OF 495.62 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE RUN N.88°20'44"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 692.50 FEET; THENCE RUN N.52°52'01"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 173.23 FEET; THENCE RUN S.37°07'59"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 123.46 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE RUN N.88°20'44"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 2,557.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE HALF, OF THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER, OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE RUN N.00°02'07"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE HALF, OF THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER, OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,389.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 51 S., RANGE 26 E. COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA; THENCE RUN N.88°05'43"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11, FOR A DISTANCE OF 590.35 FEET; THENCE RUN N.01°43'02"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,493.79 FEET; THENCE RUN S.88°09'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,274.00 FEET; THENCE RUN S.88°09'46"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 1374.52 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE RUN N.01°13'54"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF EAST ONE HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,860.10 FEET; W:\1998X1998070\CDD DISTRICT 2\CDD2LEGALDESCRIPTION.doc HM PROJECT #1998070 12/4/2002 REF. DWG. #A-1425 PAGE 7 of 7 THENCE RUN S.88°46'12"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 518.33 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS N.88°32'40"E., A DISTANCE OF 350.00 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 350.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37°05'11 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 222.61 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.17°05'16"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 226.55 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.35°37'51"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 214.87 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID US 41; THENCE RUN S.54°21'53"E. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID US 41, FOR A DISTANCE OF 807.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE RUN S.01°00'06"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 11, FOR A DISTANCE OF 3,308.61 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.; CONTAINING OR 1,009.700 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. LESS AND EXCEPT: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE NORTHEAST lA OF THE NORTHEAST lA OF THE NORTHEAST lA OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONTAINING 10.906 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. W:\I998\I998070\CDD DISTRICT 2\CDD2LEGALDESCRIPTION.doc 8C L i i 3 of 3 P.13/13 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2002-61 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 19th day of November, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 20th day of November, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex-officio to Board of County ,~ ~issioners ,,,"~,'.'?~ ¢£, .. % ~-.". ,,' ..',~ ? '/, 8C Certification I, James P. Ward, Secretary of the Board of Supervisors of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District do hereby certify that the attached copy of Resolution 2003-8 adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 on December 2, 2002 is a true and exact copy of said Resolution. Jam~ P. Ward Secretary Fiddler's Creek Community Development District #2 RESOLUTION 2003-8 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ANTHONY PIRES AS THE DISTRICT'S REGISTERED AGENT, AND FURTHER DESIGNATING THE DISTRICT'S REGISTERED OFFICE FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS AS WOODWARD, PIRES & LOMBARDO, 3200 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 200, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103- 4108 WHEREAS, Section 189.416 of the Florida Statutes requires each District to designate a Registered Office and a Registered Agent upon whom may be served any process, notice, or demand required or permitted by law to be served upon the District; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to designate Anthony Pires as its Registered Agent and designate his business address which is Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, 3200 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34103-4108 as its Registered Office; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #2: 1. Anthony Pires whose business address is Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, 3200 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34103-4108, and whose telephone number is 239-649-6555 is hereby designated as the Registered Agent of the District for the purpose of Section 189.416(1), Florida Statutes and his office as the Registered Office of the District. " 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. 3. The District Manager shall transmit certified copies of this Resolution to the Clerk of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, and to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs. Adopted this 2nd day of December, 2002. Chairman Sf rf,' tary Thursday, May 30, 2002 ,~.,Onliine uns lne Select Year: The 2001 Florida Statutes Title XII! Planning And Development 190.001 190.002 190.003 190.004 190.005 190.006 190.007 190.008 190.009 190.011 190.012 190.0125 district. 190.013 190.014 190.015 190.016 slatutes->Vlew Statutes: Online Sunshine Community Development Districts CHAPTER 190 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS Short title. Legislative findings, policies, and intent. Definitions. Preemption; sole authority. Establishment of district. Board of supervisors; members and meetings. Board of supervisors; general duties. Budget; reports and reviews. Disclosure of public financing. General powers. Special powers; public improvements and community facilities. View Entire Chapter Purchase, privatization, or sale of water, sewer, or wastewater reuse utility by Water management and control plan. Issuance of bond anticipation notes. Short-term borrowing. Bonds. 190.017 Trust agreements. 190.021 Taxes; non-ad valorem assessments. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode= Display_Statute&U RL=ChO190/ch0190.htm Page: 1 Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes.>View Statutes: Online Sunshine 190.022 Special assessments. 190.023 Issuance of certificates of indebtedness based on assessments for assessable improvements; assessment bonds. 190.024 190.025 tax sale. 190.026 190.031 190.033 190.035 Tax liens. Payment of taxes and redemption of tax liens by the district; sharing in proceeds of Foreclosure of liens. Mandatory use of certain district facilities and services. Bids required. Fees, rentals, and charges; procedure for adoption and modifications; minimum revenue requirements. 190.036 Recovery of delinquent charges. 190.037 Discontinuance of service. 190.041 Enforcement and penalties. 190.043 Suits against the district. 190.044 Exemption of district property from execution. 190.046 Termination, contraction, or expansion of district. 190.047 ]:ncorporation or annexation of district. 190.048 Sale of real estate within a district; required disclosure to purchaser. 190.0485 Notice of establishment. 190.049 Special acts prohibited. 190.001 Short title.--This act may be cited as the "Uniform Community Development District Act of 1980." History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407. 190.002 Legislative findings, policies, and intent.-- (1) The Legislature finds that: (a) There is a need for uniform, focused, and fair procedures in state law to provide a reasonable alternative for the establishment, power, operation, and duration of independent districts to manage and finance basic community development services; and that, based upon a proper and fair determination of applicable facts, an independent district can constitute a timely, efficient, effective, responsive, and economic way to deliver these basic services, thereby providing a solution to the state's planning, management, and financing needs for delivery of capital infrastructure in order to service projected growth without overburdening http :l/www.leg.state. fl.uslStatuteslindex.cfm ? App_mode= Display_Stat ute& U R L=Ch0190/ch0190.htm ~i ~ge: 2 Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine other governments and their taxpayers. (b) It is in the public interest that any independent special district created pursuant to state law not outlive its usefulness and that the operation of such a district and the exercise by the district of its powers be consistent with applicable due process, disclosure, accountability, ethics, and government-in-the-sunshine requirements which apply both to governmental entities and to their elected and appointed officials. (c) It is in the public interest that long-range planning, management, and financing and long-term maintenance, upkeep, and operation of basic services for community development districts be under one coordinated entity. (2) It is the policy of this state: (a) That the needless and indiscriminate proliferation, duplication, and fragmentation of local general-purpose government services by independent districts is not in the public interest. (b) That independent districts are a legitimate alternative method available for use by the private and public sectors, as authorized by state law, to manage and finance basic services for community developments. (c) That the exercise by any independent district of its powers as set forth by uniform general law comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations, and policies governing planning and permitting of the development to be serviced by the district, to ensure that neither the establishment nor operation of such district is a development order under chapter 380 and that the district so established does not have any zoning or permitting powers governing development. (d) That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law be fair and based only on factors material to managing and financing the service-delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerning permitting or planning of the development is not material or relevant. (3) It is the legislative intent and purpose, based upon, and consistent with, its findings of fact and declarations of policy, to authorize a uniform procedure by general law to establish an independent special district as an alternative method to manage and finance basic services for community development. It is further the legislative intent and purpose to provide by general law for the uniform operation, exercise of power, and procedure for termination of any such independent district. It is further the purpose and intent of the Legislature that a district created under this chapter not have or exercise any zoning or development permitting power, that the establishment of the independent community development district as provided in this act not be a development order within the meaning of chapter 380, and that all applicable planning and permitting laws, rules, regulations, and policies control the development of the land to be serviced by the district. It is further the purpose and intent of the Legislature that no debt or obligation of a district constitute a burden on any local general-purpose government without its consent. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 1, ch. 84-360. 190.003 Definitions.--As used in this chapter, the term: (1) "Ad valorem bonds" means bonds which are payable from the proceeds of ad valorem taxes levied on real and tangible personal property and which are generally referred to as general obligation bonds. http://www,leg.state,fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm ?App_mode= Display_Statute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190,htm Pa~e: 3 Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Stat ules: Online Sunshine 8 C ~' lPage: 4 (2) "Assessable improvements" means, without limitation, any and all public improvements and community facilities that the district is empowered to provide in accordance with this act, (3) "Assessment bonds" means special obligations of the district which are payable solely from proceeds of the special assessments levied for an assessable project. (4) "Board" or "board of supervisors" means the governing board of the district or, if such board has been abolished, the board, body, or commission succeeding to the principal functions thereof or to whom the powers given to the board by this act have been given by law. (5) "Bond" includes "certificate," and the provisions which are applicable to bonds are equally applicable to certificates. The term "bond" includes any general obligation bond, assessment bond, refunding bond, revenue bond, and other such obligation in the nature of a bond as is provided for in this act, as the case may be. (6) "Community development district" means a local unit of special-purpose government which is created pursuant to this act and limited to the performance of those specialized functions authorized by this act; the boundaries of which are contained wholly within a single county; the governing head of which is a body created, organized, and constituted and authorized to function specifically as prescribed in this act for the delivery of urban community development services; and the formation, powers, governing body, operation, duration, accountability, requirements for disclosure, and termination of which are as required by general law. (7) "Cost," when used with reference to any project, includes, but is not limited to: (a) The expenses of determining the feasibility or practicability of acquisition, construction, or reconstruction. (b) The cost of surveys, estimates, plans, and specifications. (c) The cost of improvements. (d) Engineering, fiscal, and legal expenses and charges. (e) The cost of all labor, materials, machinery, and equipment. (f) The cost of all lands, properties, rights, easements, and franchises acquired. (g) Financing charges. (h) The creation of initial reserve and debt service funds. (i) Working capital. (j) :Interest charges incurred or estimated to be incurred on money borrowed prior to and during construction and acquisition and for such reasonable period of time after completion of construction or acquisition as the board may determine. (k) The cost of issuance of bonds pursuant to this act, including advertisements and printing. (I) The cost of any election held pursuant to this act and all other expenses of issuance of bonds. (m) The discount, if any, on the sale or exchange of bonds. hltp://www.leg.stale, fl.us/Statutes/index.clm?App_mode= Display_Statute&URL=ChO190/chO190,htm Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine (n) Administrative expenses. (o) Such other expenses as may be necessary or incidental to the acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of any project or to the financing thereof, or to the development of any lands within the district. (p) Payments, contributions, dedications, and any other exactions required as a condition to receive any government approval or permit necessary to accomplish any district purpose. (8) "District" means the community development district. (9) "District manager" means the manager of the district. (10) "District roads" means highways, streets, roads, alleys, sidewalks, landscaping, storm drains, bridges, and thoroughfares of all kinds and descriptions. (11) "Elector" means a landowner or qualified elector. (12) "General obligation bonds" means bonds which are secured by, or provide for their payment by, the pledge, in addition to those special taxes levied for their discharge and such other sources as may be provided for their payment or pledged as security under the resolution authorizing their issuance, of the full faith and credit and taxing power of the district and for payment of which recourse may be had against the general fund of the district. (13) "Landowner" means the owner of a freehold estate as appears by the deed record, including a trustee, a private corporation, and an owner of a condominium unit; it does not include a reversioner, remainderman, mortgagee, or any governmental entity, who shall not be counted and need not be notified of proceedings under this act. Landowner shall also mean the owner of a ground lease from a governmental entity, which leasehold interest has a remaining term, excluding all renewal options, in excess of 50 years. (14) "Local general-purpose government" means a county, municipality, or consolidated city-county government. (15) "Project" means any development, improvement, property, utility, facility, works, enterprise, or service now existing or hereafter undertaken or established under the provisions of this act. (16) "Qualified elector" means any person at least 18 years of age who is a citizen of the United States, a legal resident of Florida and of the district, and who registers to vote with the supervisor of elections in the county in which the district land is located. (17) "Refunding bonds" means bonds issued to refinance outstanding bonds of any type and the interest and redemption premium thereon. Refunding bonds shall be issuable and payable in the same manner as the refinanced bonds, except that no approval by the electorate shall be required unless required by the State Constitution. (18) "Revenue bonds" means obligations of the district which are payable from revenues derived from sources other than ad valorem taxes on real or tangible personal property and which do not pledge the property, credit, or general tax revenue of the district. (19) "Sewer system" means any plant, system, facility, or property, and additions, extensions, and improvements thereto at any future time constructed or acquired as part thereof, useful or necessary or having the present capacity for future use in connection with the collection, http:l/www.leg.slate.fl.us/Statuteslindex.ctm?App_mode= Display_Statute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190.htrn Page: 5 Thursday, May 30, 2002 statules->View Statutes: Online Sunshine ~: 6 treatment, purification, or disposal of sewage, including, without limitation, industrial wastes resulting from any process of industry, manufacture, trade, or business or from the development of any natural resource. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term "sewer system" includes treatment plants, pumping stations, lift stations, valves, force mains, intercepting sewers, laterals, pressure lines, mains, and all necessary appurtenances and equipment; all sewer mains, laterals, and other devices for the reception and collection of sewage from premises connected therewith; and all real and personal property and any interest therein, rights, easements, and franchises of any nature relating to any such system and necessary or convenient for operation thereof. (20) "Water management and control facilities" means any lakes, canals, ditches, reservoirs, dams, levees, sluiceways, floodways, pumping stations, or any other works, structures, or facilities for the conservation, control, development, utilization, and disposal of water, and any purposes appurtenant, necessary, or incidental thereto. The term "water management and control facilities" includes all real and personal property and any interest therein, rights, easements, and franchises of any nature relating to any such water management and control facilities or necessary or convenient for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, operation, or maintenance thereof. (2:[) "Water system" means any plant, system, facility, or property and additions, extensions, and improvements thereto at any future time constructed or acquired as part thereof, useful or necessary or having the present capacity for future use in connection with the development of sources, treatment, or purification and distribution of water. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term "water system" includes dams, reservoirs, storage, tanks, mains, lines, valves, pumping stations, laterals, and pipes for the purpose of carrying water to the premises connected with such system, and all rights, easements, and franchises of any nature relating to any such system and necessary or convenient for the operation thereof. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 2, ch. 84-360; s. 10, ch. 87-363; s. 2, ch. 91-308; s. 33, ch. 2000-364. 190.004 Preemption; sole authority.-- (1) This act constitutes the sole authorization for the future establishment of independent community development districts which have any of the specialized functions and powers provided by this act. (2) The adoption of chapter 84-360, Laws of Florida, does not affect the validity of the establis, hment of any community development district or other special district existing on June 29, :[984; and existing community development districts will be subject to the provisions of chapter 190, as amended. All actions taken prior to July 1, 2000, by a community development district existing on June 29, 1984, if taken pursuant to the authority contained in chapter 80-407, Laws of Florida, or this chapter are hereby deemed to have adequate statutory authority. Nothing herein shall affect the validity of any outstanding indebtedness of a community development district established prior to June 29, :[984, and such district is hereby authorized to continue to comply with all terms and requirements of trust indentures or loan agreements relating to such outstanding indebtedness. (3) The establishment of an independent community development district as provided in this act is not a development order within the meaning of chapter 380. All governmental planning, environmental, and land development laws, regulations, and ordinances apply to all development of the land within a community development district. Community development districts do not have the power of a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan, building code, or land development code, as those terms are defined in the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. A district shall take no action http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm ?App_mode= Display_Stat ut e&U RL=Ch0190/ch0190.htm which is inconsistent with applicable comprehensive plans, ordinances, or regulations of the applicable local general-purpose government. (4) The exclusive charter for a community development district shall be the uniform community development district charter as set forth in ss. 190.006-190.041, including the special powers provided by s. 190.012. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 3, ch. 84-360; s. 27, ch. 85-55; s. 34, ch. 87-224; s. 34, ch. 99-378; s. 9, ch. 2000-304. :L90.005 Establishment of district.-- (1) The exclusive and uniform method for the establishment of a community development district with a size of 1,000 acres or more shall be pursuant to a rule, adopted under chapter 120 by the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission, granting a petition for the establishment of a community development district. (a) A petition for the establishment of a community development district shall be filed by the petitioner with the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. The petition shall contain: 1. A metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the district. Any real property within the external boundaries of the district which is to be excluded from the district shall be specifically described, and the last known address of all owners of such real property shall be listed. The petition shall also address the impact of the proposed district on any real property within the external boundaries of the district which is to be excluded from the district. 2. The written consent to the establishment of the district by all landowners whose real property is to be included in the district or documentation demonstrating that the petitioner has control by deed, trust agreement, contract, or option of 100 percent of the real property to be included in the district, and when real property to be included in the district is owned by a governmental entity and subject to a ground lease as described in s. 190.003(13), the written consent by such governmental entity. 3. A designation of five persons to be the initial members of the board of supervisors, who shall serve in that office until replaced by elected members as provided in s. 190.006. 4. The proposed name of the district. 5. A map of the proposed district showing current major trunk water mains and sewer interceptors and outfalls if in existence. 6. Based upon available data, the proposed timetable for construction of the district services and the estimated cost of constructing the proposed services. These estimates shall be submitted in good faith but shall not be binding and may be subject to change. 7. A designation of the future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for the area within the district by the future land use plan element of the effective local government comprehensive plan of which all mandatory elements have been adopted by the applicable general-purpose local government in compliance with the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. 8. A statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of s. 120,541, Page: 7 http:l/www.leg.state.fi.us/Statutes/index.ctm?App_mode= Display_Stat ute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190, him Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine (b) Prior to fil!ng the petition, the petitioner shall: age: 8 1. Pay a filing fee of $15,000 to the county and to each municipality the boundaries of which are contiguous with, or contain all or a portion of the land within, the external boundaries of the district. 2. Submit a copy of the petition to the county and to each municipality the boundaries of which are contiguous with, or contain all or a portion of, the land within the external boundaries of the district. (c) Such county and each such municipality may conduct a public hearing to consider the relationship of the petition to the factors specified in paragraph (e). The public hearing shall be concluded within 45 days after the date the petition is filed unless an extension of time is requested by the petitioner and granted by the county or municipality. The county or municipality holding such public hearing may by resolution express its support of, or objection to the granting of, the petition by the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. A resolution must base any objection to the granting of the petition upon the factors specified in paragraph (e). Such county or municipality may present its resolution of support or objection at the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission hearing and shall be afforded an opportunity to present relevant information in support of its resolution. (d) A local public hearing on the petition shall be conducted by a hearing officer in conformance with the applicable requirements and procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act. The hearing shall include oral and written comments on the petition pertinent to the factors specified in paragraph (e). The hearing shall be held at an accessible location in the county in which the community development district is to be located. The petitioner shall cause a notice of the hearing to be published in a newspaper at least once a week for the 4 successive weeks immediately prior to the hearing. Such notice shall give the time and place for the hearing, a description of the area to be included in the district, which description shall include a map showing clearly the area to be covered by the district, and any other relevant information which the establishing governing bodies may require. The advertisement shall not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. The advertisement shall be published in a newspaper of general paid circulation in the county and of general interest and readership in the community, not one of limited subject matter, pursuant to chapter 50. Whenever possible, the advertisement shall appear in a newspaper that is published at least 5 days a week, unless the only newspaper in the community is published fewer than 5 days a week. All affected units of general-purpose local government and the general public shall be given an opportunity to appear at the hearing and present oral or written comments on the petition. (e) The Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission shall consider the entire record of the local hearing, the transcript of the hearing, resolutions adopted by local general-purpose governments as provided in paragraph (c), and the following factors and make a determination to grant or deny a petition for the establishment of a community development district: 1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true and correct. 2. Whether the establishment of the district is inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan. 3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.clm?App_mode= Display_Statute& URL=Ch0190/ch0190.htrn Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine 4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district. 5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the district will be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. 6. Whether the area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate special-district government. (f) The Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission shall not adopt any rule which would expand, modify, or delete any provision of the uniform community development district charter as set forth in ss. :L90.006-190.041, except as provided in s. 190.012. A rule establishing a community development district shall: 1. Describe the external boundaries of the district and any real property within the external boundaries of the district which is to be excluded. 2. Name five persons designated to be the initial members of the board of supervisors. 3. Name the district. (g) The Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission may adopt rules setting forth its procedures for considering petitions to establish, expand, modify, or delete uniform community development districts or portions thereof consistent with the provisions of this section. (2) The exclusive and uniform method for the establishment of a community development district of less than 1,000 acres in size shall be pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the county commission of the county having jurisdiction over the majority of land in the area in which the district is to be located granting a petition for the establishment of a community development district as follows: (a) A petition for the establishment of a community development district shall be filed by the petitioner with the county commission. The petition shall contain the same information as required in paragraph (:~)(a). .(b) A public hearing on the petition shall be conducted by the county commission in accordance with the requirements and procedures of paragraph (1)(d). (c) The county commission shall consider the record of the public hearing and the factors set forth in paragraph (1)(e) in making its determination to grant or deny a petition for the establishment of a community development district. (d) The county commission shall not adopt any ordinance which would expand, modify, or delete any provision of the uniform community development district charter as set forth in ss. 190.006-:[90.041. An ordinance establishing a community development district shall include the matters provided for in paragraph (1)(f). (e) If all of the land in the area for the proposed district is within the territorial jurisdiction of a municipal corporation, then the petition requesting establishment of a community development district under this act shall be filed by the petitioner with that particular municipal corporation. In such event, the duties of the county, hereinabove described, in action upon the petition shall be the duties of the municipal corporation. If any of the land area of a proposed district is within the land area of a municipality, the county commission may not create the district http:llwww.leg.state.fi.uslstatutes/index.cfm ? App_mode= Display_Stalute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190.htrn Page: g Thursday, May 30, 2002 without municipal approval. statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine 10 (f) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, within 90 days after a petition for the establishment of a community development district has been filed pursuant to this subsection, the governing body of the county or municipal corporation may transfer the petition to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission, which shall make the determination to grant or deny the petition as provided in subsection (1). A county or municipal corporation shall have no right or power to grant or deny a petition that has been transferred to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. (3) The governing body of any existing special district, created to provide one or more of the public improvements and community facilities authorized by this act, may petition for reestablishment of the existing district as a community development district pursuant to this act. The petition shall contain the information specified in subparagraphs (1)(a)1., 3., 4., 5., 6., and 7. and shall not require payment of a fee pursuant to paragraph (1)(b). In such case, the new district so formed shall assume the existing obligations, indebtedness, and guarantees of indebtedness of the district so subsumed, and the existing district shall be terminated. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; ss. 4, 5, ch. 84-360; s. 28, ch. 85-55; s. 35, ch. 87-224; s. 34, ch. 96-410; s. 6, ch. 98-146; s. 35, ch. 99-378; s. 34, ch. 2000-364. 190.006 Board of supervisors; members and meetings.-- (1) The board of the district shall exercise the powers granted to the district pursuant to this act. The board shall consist of five members; except as otherwise provided herein, each member shall hold office for a term of 4 years and until a successor is chosen and qualifies. The members of the board must be residents of the state and citizens of the United States. (2)(a) Within 90 days following the effective date of the rule or ordinance establishing the district, there shall be held a meeting of the landowners of the district for the purpose of electing five supervisors for the district. Notice of the landowners' meeting shall be published once a week for 2 consecutive weeks in a newspaper which is in general circulation in the area of the district, the last day of such publication to be not fewer than 14 days or more than 28 days before the date of the election. The landowners, when assembled at such meeting, shall organize by electing a chair who shall conduct the meeting. (b) At such meeting, each landowner shall be entitled to cast one vote per acre of land owned by him or her and located within the district for each person to be elected. A landowner may vote in. person or by proxy in writing. A fraction of an acre shall be treated as I acre, entitling the landowner to one vote with respect thereto. The two candidates receiving the highest number of votes shall be elected for a period of 4 years, and the three candidates receiving the next largest number of votes shall be elected for a period of 2 years. The members of the first board elected by landowners shall serve their respective 4-year or 2-year terms; however, the next election by landowners shall be held on the first Tuesday in November. Thereafter, there shall be an election of supervisors for the district every 2 years in November on a date established by the board and noticed pursuant to paragraph (a). The two candidates receiving the highest number of votes shall be elected to serve for a 4-year period, and the remaining candidate elected shall serve for a 2-year period. (3)(a)1. If the board proposes to exercise the ad valorem taxing power authorized by s. 190.02:[, the district board shall call an election at which the members of the board of supervisors will be elected. Such election shall be held in conjunction with a primary or general election unless the district bears the cost of a special election. Each member shall be elected by the qualified electors of the district for a term of 4 years, except that, at the first such election, three members shall be elected for a period of 4 years and two members shall be http:/Iwww.leg.state.fl,us/Statuteslindex.cfm?App_mode= Display_Stat ute&U R L=ChOl§O/chO 190,him 8O Thursday. May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine elected for a period of 2 years. All elected board members must be qualified electors of the district. Page: 11 2.a. Regardless of whether a district has proposed to levy ad valorem taxes, commencing 6 years after the initial appointment of members or, for a district exceeding 5,000 acres in area, :1.0 years after the initial appointment of members, the position of each member whose term has expired shall be filled by a qualified elector of the district, elected by the qualified electors of the district. However, for those districts established after ~lune 21, 1991, and for those existing districts established after December 31, 1983, which have less than 50 qualified electors on .lune 21, 1991, sub-subparagraphs b. and c. shall apply. b. For those districts to which this sub-subparagraph applies if, in the 6th year after the initial appointment of members, or 10 years after such initial appointment for districts exceeding 5,000 acres in area, there are not at least 250 qualified electors in the district, or for a district exceeding 5,000 acres, there are not at least 500 qualified electors, members of the board shall continue to be elected by landowners. After the 6th or 10th year, once a district reaches 250 or 500 qualified electors, respectively, then the position of two board members whose terms are expiring shall be filled by qualified electors of the district, elected by the qualified electors of the district. One of these board members shall serve a 2-year term, and the other a 4-year term. The remaining board member whose term is expiring shall be elected for a 4-year term by the landowners and is not required to be a qualified elector. Thereafter, as terms expire, board members shall be qualified electors elected by qualified electors of the district. c. On or before July 15 of each year, the board shall determine the number of qualified electors in the district as of the immediately preceding .lune 1. The board shall use and rely upon the official records maintained by the supervisor of elections and property appraiser or tax collector in each county in making this determination. Such determination shall be made at a properly noticed meeting of the board and shall become a part of the official minutes of the district. (b) Elections of board members by qualified electors held pursuant to this subsection shall be conducted in the manner prescribed by law for holding general elections. (c) Candidates seeking election to office by qualified electors under this subsection shall conduct their campaigns in accordance with the provisions of chapter 106. Candidates shall file petitions, and take the oath required in s. 99.021, with the supervisor of elections in the county affected by such candidacy. (d) The supervisor of elections shall appoint the inspectors and clerks of elections, prepare and furnish the ballots, designate polling places, and canvass the returns of the election of board members by qualified electors. The board of county commissioners shall declare and certify the results of the election. (4) Members of the board shall be known as supervisors and, upon entering into office, shall take and subscribe to the oath of office as prescribed by s. 876.05. They shall hold office for the terms for which they were elected or appointed and until their successors are chosen and qualified. Tf, during the term of office, a vacancy occurs, the remaining members of the board shall fill the vacancy by an appointment for the remainder of the unexpired term. (5) A majority of the members of the board constitutes a quorum for the purposes of conducting its business and exercising its powers and for all other purposes. Action taken by the district shall be upon a vote of a majority of the members present unless general law or a rule of the district requires a greater number. (6) As soon as practicable after each election or appointment, the board shall organize by hltp:llwww.leg.state.fl,us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode= Display_Stat ute&URL=Oh0190/ch0190.btm Thursday, May 30, 2002 stalules->View Statules: Online Sunshine , age: 12 electing one of its members as chair and by electing a secretary, who need not be a member of the board, and such other officers as the board may deem necessary. (7) The board shall keep a permanent record book entitled "Record of Proceedings of (name of district) Community Development District," in which shall be recorded minutes of all ' meetings, resolutions, proceedings, certificates, bonds given by all employees, and any and all corporate acts. The record book shall at reasonable times be opened to inspection in the same manner as state, county, and municipal records pursuant to chapter 119. The record book shall be kept at the office or other regular place of business maintained by the board in the county or municipality in which the district is located or within the boundaries of a development of regional impact or Florida Quality Development, or combination of a development of regional impact and Florida Quality Development, which includes the district. (8) Each supervisor shall be entitled to receive for his or her services an amount not to exceed $200 per meeting of the board of supervisors, not to exceed $4,800 per year per supervisor, or an amount established by the electors at referendum. In addition, each supervisor shall receive travel and per diem expenses as set forth in s. 112.061. (9) All meetings of the board shall be open to the public and governed by the provisions of chapter 286. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 6, ch. 84-360; s. 23, ch. 85-80; s. 3, ch. 91-308; s. 962, ch. 95-147; s. 36, ch. 99-378; s. 19, ch. 2000-158. 190.007 Board of supervisors; general duties.-- (1) The board shall employ, and fix the compensation of, a district manager. The district manager shall have charge and supervision of the works of the district and shall be responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of this act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the district, and for performing such other duties as may be prescribed by the board. It shall not be a conflict of interest under chapter 112 for a board member or the district manager or another employee of the district to be a stockholder, officer, or employee of a landowner. The district manager may hire or otherwise employ and terminate the employment of such other persons, including, without limitation, professional, supervisory, and clerical employees, as may be necessary and authorized by the board. The compensation and other conditions of employment of the officers and employees of the district shall be as provided by the board. (2) The board shall designate a person who is a resident of the state as treasurer of the district, who shall have charge of the funds of the district. Such funds shall be disbursed only upon the order, or pursuant to the resolution, of the board by warrant or check countersigned by the treasurer and by such other person as may be authorized by the board. The board may give the treasurer such other or additional powers and duties as the board may deem appropriate and may fix his or her compensation. The board may require the treasurer to give a bond in such amount, on such terms, and with such sureties as may be deemed satisfactory to the board to secure the performance by the treasurer of his or her powers and duties. The financial records of the board shall be audited by an independent certified public accountant at least once a year. (3) The board is authorized to select as a depository for its funds any qualified public depository as defined in s. 280.02 which meets all the requirements of chapter 280 and has been designated by the Treasurer as a qualified public depository, upon such terms and conditions as to the payment of interest by such depository upon the funds so deposited as the board may deem just and reasonable. http:l/www.leg.slate.fl.us/Statuteslindex.cfm?App_mode= Display_Stat ute&URL=ChO 190/chO190.htm r8c Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine Page: 13 History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 7, ch. 84-360; s. 32, ch. 86-191; s. 963, ch. 95-147. 190.008 Budget; reports and reviews.-- (1) The district shall provide financial reports in such form and such manner as prescribed pursuant to this chapter and chapter 2:[8. (2)(a) On or before each July 15, the district manager shall prepare a proposed budget for the ensuing fiscal year to be submitted to the board for board approval. The proposed budget shall include at the direction of the board an estimate of all necessary expenditures of the district for the ensuing fiscal year and an estimate of income to the district from the taxes and assessments provided in this act. The board shall consider the proposed budget item by item and may either approve the budget as proposed by the district manager or modify the same in part or in whole. The board shall indicate its approval of the budget by resolution, which resolution shall provide for a hearing on the budget as approved. Notice of the hearing on the budget shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the district once a week for 2 consecutive weeks, except that the first publication shall be not fewer than 15 days prior to the date of the hearing. The notice shall further contain a designation of the day, time, and place of the public hearing. At the time and place designated in the notice, the board shall hear all objections to the budget as proposed and may make such changes as the board deems necessary. At the conclusion of the budget hearing, the board shall, by resolution, adopt the budget as finally approved by the board. The budget shall be adopted prior to October :[ of each year. (b) At least 60 days prior to adoption, the district board shall submit to the local governing authorities having jurisdiction over the area included in the district, for purposes of disclosure and information only, the proposed annual budget for the ensuing fiscal year and any proposed long-term financial plan or program of the district for future operations. (c) The local governing authorities may review the proposed annual budget and any long-term financial plan or program and may submit written comments to the board for its assistance and information in adopting its annual budget and long-term financial plan or program. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407. 190.009 Disclosure of public financing.-- (1) The district shall take affirmative steps to provide for the full disclosure of information relating, to the public financing and maintenance of improvements to real property undertaken by the district. Such information shall be made available to all existing residents, and to all prospective residents, of the district. The district shall furnish each developer of a residential development within the district with sufficient copies of that information to provide each prospective initial purchaser of property in that development with a copy, and any developer of a residential development within the district, when required by law to provide a public offering statement, shall include a copy of such information relating to the public financing and maintenance of improvements in the public offering statement. (2) The Division of Florida Land Sales, Condominiums, and Mobile Homes of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation shall ensure that disclosures made by developers pursuant to chapter 498 meet the requirements of subsection (1). (3) The Department of Community Affairs shall keep a current list of districts and their disclosures pursuant to this act and shall make such studies and reports and take such actions as it deems necessary. htt p://www. Jeg. state.fl, us/Stat uJ[es/in dex.cfm ?App_rnode= Display_Statute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190.htm History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 17, ch. 81-167; s. 15, ch. 83-55; s. 1, ch. 85-60; s. 2, ch. 90-46; s. 9, ch. 94-218; s. 37, ch. 99-378. 190.011 General powers.--The district shall have, and the board may exercise, the following po we rs: (1) To sue and be sued in the name of the district; to adopt and use a seal and authorize the use of a facsimile thereof; to acquire, by purchase, gift, devise, or otherwise, and to dispose of, real and personal property, or any estate therein; and to make and execute contracts and other instruments necessary or convenient to the exercise of its powers. (2) To apply for coverage of its employees under the state retirement system in the same manner as if such employees were state employees, subject to necessary action by the district to pay employer contributions into the state retirement fund. (3) To contract for the services of consultants to perform planning, engineering, legal, or other appropriate services of a professional nature. Such contracts shall be subject to public bidding or competitive negotiation requirements as set forth in s. 190.033. (4) To borrow money and accept gifts; to apply for and use grants or loans of money or other properly from the United StaLes, the state, a unit of local government, or any person for any district purposes and enter into agreements required in connection therewith; and to hold, use, and dispose of such moneys or property for any district purposes in accordance with the terms of the gift, grant, loan, or agreement relating thereto. (5) To adopt rules and orders pursuant to the provisions of chapter 120 prescribing the powers, duties, and functions of the officers of the district; the conduct of the business of the district; the maintenance of records; and the form of certificates evidencing tax liens and all other documents and records of the district. The board may also adopt administrative rules with respect to any of the projects of the district and define the area to be included therein. The board may also adopt resolutions which may be necessary for the conduct of district business. (6) To maintain an office at such place or places as it may designate within a county in which the district is located or within the boundaries of a development of regional impact or a Florida Quality Development, or a combination of a development of regional impact and a Florida Quality Development, which includes the district, which office must be reasonably accessible to the landowners. IVleetings pursuant to s. 189.4:[7(3) of a district within the boundaries of a development of regional impact or Florida Quality Development, or a combination of a development of regional impact and a Florida Quality Development, may be held at such office. (7) To hold, control, and acquire by donation, purchase, or condemnation, or dispose of, any public easements, dedications to public use, platted reservations for public purposes, or any reservations for those purposes authorized by this act and to make use of such easements, dedications, or reservations for any of the purposes authorized by this act. (8) To lease as lessor or lessee to or from any person, firm, corporation, association, or body, public or private, any projects of the type that the district is authorized to undertake and facilities or property of any nature for the use of the district to carry out any of the purposes authorized by this act. (9) To borrow money and issue bonds, certificates, warrants, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness as hereinafter provided; to levy such tax and special assessments as may be authorized; and to charge, collect, and enforce fees and other user charges. Page: 14 ht (p://www.leg.sta~e.f L us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode= Display_Statute&U RL=Ch0190/ch0190,htm Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine (10) To raise, by user charges or fees authorized by resolution of the board, amounts of money which are necessary for the conduct of the district activities and services and to enforce their receipt and collection in the manner prescribed by resolution not inconsistent with law. Page: 15 (11) To exercise within the district, or beyond the district with prior approval by resolution of the governing body of the county if the taking will occur in an unincorporated area or with prior approval by resolution of the governing body of the municipality if the taking will occur within a municipality, the right and power of eminent domain, pursuant to the provisions of chapters 73 and 74, over any property within the state, except municipal, county, state, and federal property, for the uses and purposes of the district relating solely to water, sewer, district roads, and water management, specifically including, without limitation, the power for the taking of easements for the drainage of the land of one person over and through the land of another. (12) To cooperate with, or contract with, other governmental agencies as may be necessary, convenient, incidental, or proper in connection with any of the powers, duties, or purposes authorized by this act. (13) To assess and impose upon lands in the district ad valorem taxes as provided by this act. (14) To determine, order, levy, impose, collect, and enforce special assessments pursuant to this act and chapter 170. Such special assessments may, in the discretion of the district, be collected and enforced pursuant to the provisions of ss. 197.3631, 197.3632, and 197.3635, or chapter 170. (15) To exercise all of the powers necessary, convenient, incidental, or proper in connection with any of the powers, duties, or purposes authorized by this act. (16) To exercise such special powers as may be authorized by this act. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 8, ch. 84-360; s. 46, ch. 89-169; s. 4, ch. 91-308; s. 38, ch. 99-378. 190,012 Special powers; public improvements and community facilities.--The district shall have, and the board may exercise, subject to the regulatory jurisdiction and permitting authority of all applicable governmental bodies, agencies, and special districts having authority with respect to any area included therein, any or all of the following special powers relating to public improvements and community facilities authorized by this act: (1) To finance, fund, plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate, and maintain systems, facilities, and basic infrastructures for the following: (a) Water management and control for the lands within the district and to connect some or any of such facilities with roads and bridges. (b) Water supply, sewer, and wastewater management, reclamation, and reuse or any combination thereof, and to construct and operate connecting intercepting or outlet sewers and sewer mains and pipes and water mains, conduits, or pipelines in, along, and under any street, alley, highway, or other public place or ways, and to dispose of any effluent, residue, or other byproducts of such system or sewer system. (c) Bridges or culverts that may be needed across any drain, ditch, canal, floodway, holding basin, excavation, public highway, tract, grade, fill, or cut and roadways over levees and embankments, and to construct any and all of such works and improvements across, through, or over any public right-of-way, highway, grade, fill, or cut. http:l/www.leg.state.fl,uslStatuteslindex.cfm?App_mode= Display_Statute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190.htm Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine (d)l. District roads equal to or exceeding the specifications of the county in which such district roads are located, and street lights. 2. Buses, trolleys, transit shelters, ridesharing facilities and services, parking improvements, and related signage. (e) Investigation and remediation costs associated with the cleanup of actual or perceived environmental contamination within the district under the supervision or direction of a competent governmental authority unless the covered costs benefit any person who is a landowner within the district and who caused or contributed to the contamination. (f) Conservation areas, mitigation areas, and wildlife habitat, including the maintenance of any plant or animal species, and any related interest in real or personal property. (g) Any other project within or without the boundaries of a district when a local government issued a development order pursuant to s. 380.06 or s. 380.061 approving or expressly requiring the construction or funding of the project by the district, or when the project is the subject of an agreement between the district and a governmental entity and is consistent with the local government comprehensive plan of the local government within which the project is to be located. (2) After the board has obtained the consent of the local general-purpose government within the jurisdiction of which a power specified in this subsection is to be exercised, to plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate, and maintain additional systems and facilities for: (a) Parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses. (b) Fire prevention and control, including fire stations, water mains and plugs, fire trucks, and other vehicles and equipment. (c) School buildings and related structures, which may be leased, sold, or donated to the school district, for use in the educational system when authorized by the district school board. (d) Security, including, but not limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion-detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies; except that the district may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general-purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services within the district boundaries. (e) Control and elimination of mosquitoes and other arthropods of public health importance. (f) Waste collection and disposal. (3) To adopt and enforce appropriate rules following the procedures of chapter 120, in connection with the provision of one or more services through its systems and facilities. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 51, ch. 83-217; s. 9, ch. 84-360; s. 47, ch. 89-169; s. 8, ch. 93-5:L; s. 39, ch. 99-378; s. 15, ch. 2000-317; s. 47, ch. 2000-364. 190.0125 Purchase, privatization, or sale of water, sewer, or wastewater reuse utility by district.--No community development district may purchase or sell a water, sewer, or wastewater reuse utility that provides service to the public for compensation, or enter into a wastewater facility privatization contract for a wastewater facility, until the governing body of http://www.leg.state.fL us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode= Display_Statute&U RL=Ch0190/ch0190.htm Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine the community development district has held a public hearing on the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract and made a determination that the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract is in the public interest. In determining if the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract is in the public interest, the community development district shall consider, at a minimum, the following: (1) The most recent available income and expense statement for the utility; (2) The most recent available balance sheet for the utility, listing assets and liabilities and clearly showing the amount of contributions-in-aid-of-construction and the accumulated depreciation thereon; (3) A statement of the existing rate base of the utility for regulatory purposes; (4) The physical condition of the utility facilities being purchased, sold, or subject to a wastewater facility privatization contract; (5) The reasonableness of the purchase, sales, or wastewater facility privatization contract price and terms; (6) The impacts of the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract on utility customers, both positive and negative; (7)(a) Any additional investment required and the ability and willingness of the purchaser or the private firm under a wastewater facility privatization contract to make that investment, whether the purchaser is the community development district or the entity purchasing the utility from the community development district; (b) In the case of a wastewater facility privatization contract, the terms and conditions on which the private firm will provide capital investment and financing or a combination thereof for contemplated capital replacements, additions, expansions, and repairs. The community development district shall give significant weight to this criteria. (8) The alternatives to the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract and the potential impact on utility customers if the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract is not made; (9)(a) The ability of the purchaser or the private firm under a wastewater facility privatization contract to provide and maintain high-quality and cost-effective utility service, whether the purchaser is the community development district or the entity purchasing the utility from the community development district; (b) I'n the case of a wastewater facility privatization contract, the community development district shall give significant weight to the technical expertise and experience of the private firm in carrying out the obligations specified in the wastewater facility privatization contract; and (10) All moneys paid by a private firm to a community development district pursuant to a wastewater facility privatization contract shall be used for the purpose of reducing or offsetting property taxes, wastewater service rates, or debt reduction or making infrastructure improvements or capital asset expenditures or other public purpose; provided, however, nothing herein shall preclude the community development district from using all or part of the moneys for the purpose of the community development district's qualification for relief from the repayment of federal grant awards associated with the wastewater system as may be required by federal law or regulation. Page: 17 http:l/www.leg,state.fLus/Statutes/index.cfm?App_rnode= Display_Statute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190.htm 8C Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine ~' ge: 18 The community development district shall prepare a statement showing that the purchase, sale, or wastewaLer facility privatization contract is in the public interest, including a summary of the purchaser's or private firm's experience in water, sewer, or wastewater reuse utility operation and a showing of financial ability to provide the service, whether the purchaser or private firm is the community development district or the entity purchasing the utility from the community development district. History.--s. 3, ch. 84-84; s. 9, ch. 93-51; s. 9, ch. 96-202. 190.013 Water management and control plan.--In the event that the board assumes the responsibility for providing water management and control for the district as provided in s. 190.012(1)(a) which is to be financed by benefit special assessments, the board shall proceed to adopt water management and control plans, assess for benefits, and apportion and levy special assessments, as follows: (1) The board shall cause to be made by the district's engineer, or such other engineer or engineers as the board may employ for that purpose, complete and comprehensive water management and control plans for the lands located within the district that will be improved in any part or in whole by any system of facilities that may be outlined and adopted, and the engineer shall make a report in writing to the board with maps and profiles of said surveys and an estimate of the cost of carrying out and completing the plans. (2) Upon the completion of such plans, the board shall hold a hearing thereon to hear objections thereto, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for such hearing by publication once each week for 2 consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the general area of the district, and shall permit the inspection of the plan at the office of the district by all persons interested. All objections to the plan shall be filed at or before the time fixed in the notice for the hearing and shall be in writing. (3) After the hearing, the board shall consider the proposed plan and any objections thereto and may modify, reject, or adopt the plan or continue the hearing to a day certain for further consideration of the proposed plan or modifications thereof. (4) When the board approves a plan, a resolution shall be adopted and a certified copy thereof shall be filed in the office of the secretary and incorporated by him or her into the records of the district. (5) The water management and control plan may be altered in detail from time to time until the appraisal record herein provided is filed, but not in such manner as to affect materially the conditions of its adoption. After the appraisal record has been filed, no alteration of the plan shall be made, except as provided by this act. (6) Within 20 days after the final adoption of the plan by the board, the board shall proceed pursuant to s. 298.301. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 5, ch. 91-308; s. 964, ch. 95-147; s. 26, ch. 97-40. 190.014 Tssuance of bond anticipation notes.--In addition to the other powers provided for in this act, and not in limitation thereof, the district shall have the power, at any time, and from time to time after the issuance of any bonds of the district shall have been authorized, to borrow money for the purposes for which such bonds are to be issued in anticipation of the receipt of the proceeds of the sale of such bonds and to issue bond anticipation notes in a principal sum not in excess of the authorized maximum amount of such bond issue. Such notes shall be in such denomination or denominations, bear interest at such rate as the board may determine in compliance with s. 215.84, mature at such time or times not later than 5 years http://www, leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode= Display_Stalute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190.htrn from the date of issuance, and be in such form and executed in such manner as the board shall prescribe. Such notes may be sold at either public or private sale or, if such notes shall be renewal notes, may be exchanged for notes then outstanding on such terms as the board shall determine. Such notes shall be paid from the proceeds of such bonds when issued. The board may, in its discretion, in lieu of retiring the notes by means of bonds, retire them by means of current revenues or from any taxes or assessments levied for the payment of such bonds; but in such event a like amount of the bonds authorized shall not be issued. Page: 19 History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 9, ch. 83-215. 190.015 Short-term borrowing.--The district at any time may obtain loans, in such amount and on such terms and conditions as the board may approve, for the purpose of paying any of the expenses of the district or any costs incurred or that may be incurred in connection with any of the projects of the district, which loans shall bear such interest as the board may determine in compliance with s. 215.84, and may be payable from and secured by a pledge of such funds, revenues, taxes, and assessments as the board may determine, subject, however, to the provisions contained in any proceeding under which bonds were theretofore issued and are then outstanding. For the purpose of defraying such costs and expenses, the district may issue negotiable notes, warrants, or other evidences of debt to be payable at such times, to bear such interest as the board may determine in compliance with s. 215.84, and to be sold or discounted at such price or prices not less than 95 percent of par value and on such terms as the board may deem advisable. The board shall have the right to provide for the payment thereof by pledging the whole or any part of the funds, revenues, taxes, and assessments of the district. The approval of the electors residing in the district shall not be necessary except when required by the State Constitution. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 80, ch. 81-259; s. 10, ch. 83-215. 190.016 Bonds.-- (1) SALE OF BONDS.--Bonds may be sold in blocks or installments at different times, or an entire issue or series may be sold at one time. Bonds may be sold at public or private sale after such advertisement, if any, as the board may deem advisable but not in any event at less than 90 percent of the par value thereof, together with accrued interest thereon. Bonds may be sold or exchanged for refunding bonds. Special assessment and revenue bonds may be delivered by the district as payment of the purchase price of any project or part thereof, or a combination of projects or parts thereof, or as the purchase price or exchange for any property, real, personal, or mixed, including franchises or services rendered by any contractor, engineer, or other person, all at one time or in blocks from time to time, in such manner and upon such terms as the board in its discretion shall determine. The price or prices for any bonds sold, exchanged, or delivered may be: (a) The money paid for the bonds; (b) The principal amount, plus accrued interest to the date of redemption or exchange, or outstanding obligations exchanged for refunding bonds; and (c) In the case of special assessment or revenue bonds, the amount of any indebtedness to contractors or other persons paid with such bonds, or the fair value of any properties exchanged for the bonds, as determined by the board. (2) AUTHORIZATION AND FORM OF BONDS.--Any general obligation bonds, benefit bonds, or revenue bonds may be authorized by resolution or resolutions of the board which shall be adopted by a majority of all the members thereof then in office. Such resolution or resolutions may be adopted at the same meeting at which they are introduced and need not be published http:llwww.leg.state,fl,uslStatutes/index.cfrn?App_mode= Display_Statute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190.htrn Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine Page: 20 or posted. The board may, by resolution, authorize the issuance of bonds and fix the aggregate amount of bonds to be issued; the purpose or purposes for which the moneys derived therefrom shall be expended, including, but not limited to, payment of costs as defined in s. 190.003(7); the rate or rates of interest, in compliance with s. 215.84; the denomination of the bonds; whether or not the bonds are to be issued in one or more series; the date or dates of maturity, which shall not exceed 40 years from their respective dates of issuance; the medium of payment; the place or places within or without the state where payment shall be made; registration privileges; redemption terms and privileges, whether with or without premium; the manner of execution; the form of the bonds, including any interest coupons to be attached thereto; the manner of execution of bonds and coupons; and any and all other terms, covenants, and conditions thereof and the establishment of revenue or other funds. Such authorizing resolution or resolutions may further provide for the contracts authorized by s. 159.825(1)(f) and (g) regardless of the tax treatment of such bonds being authorized, subject to the finding by the board of a net saving to the district resulting by reason thereof. Such authorizing resolution may further provide that such bonds may be executed in accordance with the Registered Public Obligations Act, except that bonds not issued in registered form shall be valid if manually countersigned by an officer designated by appropriate resolution of the board. The seal of the district may be affixed, lithographed, engraved, or otherwise reproduced in facsimile on such bonds. In case any officer whose signature shall appear on any bonds or coupons shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of such bonds, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until such delivery. (3) INTERIM CERTIFICATES; REPLACEMENT CERTiFICATES.--Pending the preparation of definitive bonds, the board may issue interim certificates or receipts or temporary bonds, in such form and with such provisions as the board may determine, exchangeable for definitive bonds when such bonds have been executed and are available for delivery. The board may also provide for the replacement of any bonds which become mutilated, lost, or destroyed. (4) NEGO-I-[ABILITY OF BONDS.--Any bond issued under this act or any temporary bond, in the absence of an express recital on the face thereof that it is nonnegotiable, shall be fully negotiable and shall be and constitute a negotiable instrument within the meaning and for all purposes of the law merchant and the laws of the state. (5) DEFEASANCE.--The board may make such provision with respect to the defeasance of the right, title, and interest of the holders of any of the bonds and obligations of the district in any revenues, funds, or other properties by which such bonds are secured as the board deems appropriate and, without limitation on the foregoing, may provide that when such bonds or obligations become due and payable or shall have been called for redemption and the whole amount of the principal and interest and premium, if any, due and payable upon the bonds or obligations then outstanding shall be held in trust for such purpose and provision shall also be made for paying all other sums payable in connection with such bonds or other obligations, then and in such event the right, title, and interest of the holders of the bonds in any revenues, funds, or other properties by which such bonds are secured shall thereupon cease, terminate, and become void; and the board may apply any surplus in any sinking fund established in connection with such bonds or obligations and all balances remaining in all other funds or accounts other than money held for the redemption or payment of the bonds or other obligations to any lawful purpose of the district as the board shall determine. (6) ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL BONDS.--If the proceeds of any bonds are less than the cost of completing the project in connection with which such bonds were issued, the board may authorize the issuance of additional bonds, upon such terms and conditions as the board may provide in the resolution authorizing the issuance thereof, but only in compliance with the resolution or other proceedings authorizing the issuance of the original bonds. http://www.leg.state.fl,us/Statutes/index.ctm?App_rnode= Display_Statute&U RL=Ch0190/ch0190.htm Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine age: 21 , (7) REFUNDING BONDS.--The district shall have the power to issue bonds to provide for the retirement or refunding of any bonds or obligations of the district that at the time of such issuance are or subsequently thereto become due and payable, or that at the time of issuance have been called or are or will be subject to call for redemption within 10 years thereafter, or the surrender of which can be procured from the holders thereof at prices satisfactory to the board. Refunding bonds may be issued at any time when in the judgment of the board such issuance will be advantageous to the district. No approval of the qualified electors residing in the district shall be required for the issuance of refunding bonds except in cases in which such approval is required by the State Constitution. The board may by resolution confer upon the holders of such refunding bonds all rights, powers, and remedies to which the holders would be entitled if they continued to be the owners and had possession of the bonds for the refinancing of which such refunding bonds are issued, including, but not limited to, the preservation of the lien of such bonds on the revenues of any project or on pledged funds, without extinguishment, impairment, or diminution thereof. The provisions of this act pertaining to bonds of the district shall, unless the context otherwise requires, govern the issuance of refunding bonds, the form and other details thereof, the rights of the holders thereof, and the duties of the board with respect to them. (8) REVENUE BONDS.-- (a) The district shall have the power to issue revenue bonds from time to time without limitation as to amount. Such revenue bonds may be secured by, or payable from, the gross or net pledge of the revenues to be derived from any project or combination of projects; from the rates, fees, or other charges to be collected from the users of any project or projects; from any revenue-producing undertaking or activity of the district; from special assessments; or from any other source or pledged security. Such bonds shall not constitute an indebtedness of the district, and the approval of the qualified electors shall not be required unless such bonds are additionally secured by the full faith and credit and taxing power of the district. (b) Any two or more projects may be combined and consolidated into a single project and may hereafter be operated and maintained as a single project. The revenue bonds authorized herein may be issued to finance any one or more of such projects, regardless of whether or not such projects have been combined and consolidated into a single project. If the board deems it advisable, the proceedings authorizing such revenue bonds may provide that the district may thereafter combine the projects then being financed or theretofore financed with other projects to be subsequently financed by the district and that revenue bonds to be thereafter issued by the district shall be on parity with the revenue bonds then being issued, · all on such terms, conditions, and limitations as shall have been provided in the proceeding which authorized the original bonds. (9) GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS.-- (a) The district shall have the power from time to time to issue general obligation bonds to finance or refinance capital projects or to refund outstanding bonds in an aggregate principal amount of bonds outstanding at any one time not in excess of 35 percent of the assessed value of the taxable property within the district as shown on the pertinent tax records at the time of the authorization of the general obligation bonds for which the full faith and credit of the district is pledged. Except for refunding bonds, no general obligation bonds shall be issued unless the bonds are issued to finance or refinance a capital project and the issuance has been approved at an election held in accordance with the requirements for such election as prescribed by the StaLe Constitution. Such elections shall be called to be held in the district by the board of county commissioners of the county upon the request of the board of the district. The expenses of calling and holding an election shall be at the expense of the district, and the district shall reimburse the county for any expenses incurred in calling or holding such election. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode= Display_Stalute&U RL=ChO190/ch0190.htm (b) The district may pledge its full faith and credit for the payment of the principal and interest on such general obligation bonds and for any reserve funds provided therefor and may unconditionally and irrevocably pledge itself to levy ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the district, to the extent necessary for the payment thereof, without limitations as to rate or amount. (c) If the board determines to issue general obligation bonds for more than one capital project, the approval of the issuance of the bonds for each and all such projects may be submitted to the electors on one and the same ballot. The failure of the electors to approve the issuance of bonds for any one or more capital projects shall not defeat the approval of bonds for any capital project which has been approved by the electors. (d) In arriving at the amount of general obligation bonds permitted to be outstanding at any one time pursuant to paragraph (a), there shall not be included any general obligation bonds which are additionally secured by the pledge of: 1. Special assessments levied in an amount sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the general obligation bonds so additionally secured, which assessments have been equalized and confirmed by resolution or ordinance of the board pursuant to s. 170.08. 2. Water revenues, sewer revenues, or water and sewer revenues of the district to be derived from user fees in an amount sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the general obligation bonds so additionally secured. 3. Any combination of assessments and revenues described in subparagraphs 1. and 2. (10) BONDS AS LEGAL INVESTMENT OR SECURITY.-- (a) Notwithstanding any provisions of any other law to the contrary, all bonds issued under the provisions of this act shall constitute legal investments for savings banks, banks, trust companies, insurance companies, executors, administrators, trustees, guardians, and other fiduciaries and for any board, body, agency, instrumentality, county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the state and shall be and constitute security which may be deposited by banks or trust companies as security for deposits of state, county, municipal, or other public funds or by insurance companies as required or voluntary statutory deposits. (b) Any bonds issued by the district shall be incontestable in the hands of bona fide purchasers or holders for value and shall not be invalid because of any irregularity or defect in the proceedings for the issue and sale thereof. (11) COVENANTS.--Any resolution authorizing the issuance of bonds may contain such covenants as the board may deem advisable, and all such covenants shall constitute valid and legally binding and enforceable contracts between the district and the bondholders, regardless of the time of issuance thereof. Such covenants may include, without limitation, covenants concerning the disposition of the bond proceeds; the use and disposition of project revenues; the pledging of revenues, taxes, and assessments; the obligations of the district with respect to the operation of the project and the maintenance of adequate project revenues; the issuance of additional bonds; the appointment, powers, and duties of trustees and receivers; the acquisition of outstanding bonds and obligations; restrictions on the establishing of competing projects or facilities; restrictions on the sale or disposal of the assets and property of the district; the priority of assessment liens; the priority of claims by bondholders on the taxing power of the district; the maintenance of deposits to assure the payment of revenues by users of district facilities and services; the discontinuance of district services by reason of delinquent payments; acceleration upon default; the execution of necessary instruments; the procedure for amending or abrogating covenants with the bondholders; and such other htr p://www.leg.st ate.fl .us/Slatutes/index,cfm?App_mode= Display_Statute& U RL=Ch0190/ch0190.htrn Thumday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine ! 8C covenants as may be deemed necessary or desirable for the security of the bondholders. (12) VALIDATION PROCEEDINGS.--The power of the district to issue bonds under the provisions of this act may be determined, and any of the bonds of the district maturing over a period of more than 5 years shall be validated and confirmed, by court decree, under the provisions of chapter 75 and laws amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto. (13) ACT FURNISHES FULL AUTHORITY FOR ISSUANCE OF BONDS.--This act constitutes full and complete authority for the issuance of bonds and the exercise of the powers of the district provided herein. No procedures or proceedings, publications, notices, consents, approvals, orders, acts, or things by the board, or any board, officers, commission, department, agency, or instrumentality of the district, other than those required by this act, shall be required to perform anything under this act, except that the issuance or sale of bonds pursuant to the provisions of this act shall comply with the general law requirements applicable to the issuance or sale of bonds by the district. Nothing in this act shall be construed to authorize the district to utilize bond proceeds to fund the ongoing operations of the district. (14) PLEDGE BY THE STATE TO THE BONDHOLDERS OF THE DISTRICT.--The state pledges to the holders of any bonds issued under this act that it will not limit or alter the rights of the district to own, acquire, construct, reconstruct, improve, maintain, operate, or furnish the projects or to levy and collect the taxes, assessments, rentals, rates, fees, and other charges provided for herein and to fulfill the terms of any agreement made with the holders of such bonds or other obligations and that it will not in any way impair the rights or remedies of such holders. (15) DEFAULT.--A default on the bonds or obligations of a district shall not constitute a debt or obligation of a local general-purpose government or the state. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 11, ch. 83-215; s. 10, ch. 84-360; s. 24, ch. 85-80; s. 6, ch. 91-308; s. 965, ch. 95-147; s. 8, ch. 98-47. 190.017 Trust agreements.--Any issue of bonds shall be secured by a trust agreement by and between the district and a corporate trustee or trustees, which may be any trust company or bank having the powers of a trust company within or without the state. The resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds or such trust agreement may pledge the revenues to be received from any projects of the district and may contain such provisions for protecting and enforcing the rights and remedies of the bondholders as the board may approve, including, without limitation, covenants setting forth the duties of the district in relation to: the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, maintenance, repair, operation, and insurance of any projects; the fixing and revising of the rates, fees, and charges; and the custody, safeguarding, and application of all moneys and for the employment of consulting engineers in connection with such acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, maintenance, repair, or operation. It shall be lawful for any bank or trust company within or without the state which may act as a depository of the proceeds of bonds or of revenues to furnish such indemnifying bonds or to pledge such securities as may be required by the district. Such resolution or trust agreement may set forth the rights and remedies of the bondholders and of the trustee, if any, and may restrict the individual right of action by bondholders. The board may provide for the payment of proceeds of the sale of the bonds and the revenues of any project to such officer, board, or depository as it may designate for the custody thereof and may provide for the method of disbursement thereof with such safeguards and restrictions as it may determine. All expenses incurred in carrying out the provisions of such resolution or trust agreement may be treated as part of the cost of operation of the project to which such trust agreement pertains. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407. http:l/www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode= Oisplay_Statute&U RL=Ch0190/ch0190.htrn Page:23 Thursday, May 30. 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine 190.021 Taxes; non-ad valorem assessments.-- (1) AD VALOREM TAXES.--An elected board shall have the power to levy and assess an ad valorem tax on all the taxable property in the district to construct, operate, and maintain assessable improvements; to pay the principal of, and interest on, any general obligation bonds of the district; and to provide for any sinking or other funds established in connection with any such bonds. An ad valorem tax levied by the board for operating purposes, exclusive of debt service on bonds, shall not exceed 3 mills, except that a district authorized by a local general-purpose government to exercise one or more powers specified in s. 190.012(2) may levy an additional 2 mills for operating purposes, exclusive of debt service on bonds. The ad valorem tax provided for herein shall be in addition to county and all other ad valorem taxes provided for by law. Such tax shall be assessed, levied, and collected in the same manner and same time as county taxes. The levy of ad valorem taxes shall be approved by referendum when required by the State Constitution. (2) BENEFIT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS.--The board shall annually determine, order, and levy the annual installment of the total benefit special assessments for bonds issued and related expenses to finance district facilities and projects which are levied under this act. These assessments may be due and collected during each year that county taxes are due and collected, in which case such annual installment and levy shall be evidenced to and certified to the property appraiser by the board not later than August 31 of each year, and such assessment shall be entered by the property appraiser on the county tax rolls, and shall be collected and enforced by the tax collector in the same manner and at the same time as county taxes, and the proceeds thereof shall be paid to the district. However, this subsection shall not prohibit the district in its discretion from using the method prescribed in either s. 197.363 or s. 197.3632 for collecting and enforcing these assessments. These benefit special assessments shall be a lien on the property against which assessed until paid and shall be enforceable in like manner as county taxes. The amount of the assessment for the exercise of the district's powers under ss. 190.011 and 190.012 shall be determined by the board based upon a report of the district's engineer and assessed by the board upon such lands, which may be part or all of the lands within the district benefited by the improvement, apportioned between benefited lands in proportion to the benefits received by each tract of land. (3) MAINTENANCE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS.--To maintain and preserve the facilities and projects of the district, the board may levy a maintenance special assessment. This assessment may be evidenced to and certified to the property appraiser by the board of supervisors not later than August 31 of each year and shall be entered by the property appraiser on the county tax rolls and shall be collected and enforced by the tax collector in the same manner and at the same time as county taxes, and the proceeds therefrom shall be paid to the district. However, this subsection shall not prohibit the district in its discretion from using the method prescribed in either s. 197.363 or s. 197.3632 for collecting and enforcing these assessments. These maintenance special assessments shall be a lien on the property against which assessed until paid and shall be enforceable in like manner as county taxes. The amount of the maintenance special assessment for the exercise of the district's powers under ss. 190.011 and 190.012 shall be determined by the board based upon a report of the district's engineer and assessed by the board upon such lands, which may be all of the lands within the district benefited by the maintenance thereof, apportioned between the benefited lands in proportion to the benefits received by each tract of land. (4) ENFORCEMENT OF TAXES.--The collection and enforcement of all taxes levied by the district shall be at the same time and in like manner as county taxes, and the provisions of the Florida Statutes relating to the sale of lands for unpaid and delinquent county taxes; the issuance, sale, and delivery of tax certificates for such unpaid and delinquent county taxes; the redemption thereof; the issuance to individuals of tax deeds based thereon; and all other h~,tp:/Iwww.leg.state.fl.uslSlatutes/index.cfrn?App_rnode= Display_Statute&U RL=Ch0190/ch0190.htm Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine 8C procedures in connection therewith shall be applicable to the district to the same extent as if such statutory provisions were expressly set forth herein. All taxes shall be subject to the same discounts as county taxes. (5) WHEN UNPAID TAX IS DELINQUENT; PENALTY.--All taxes provided for in this act shall become delinquent and bear penalties on the amount of such taxes in the same manner as county taxes. (6) TAX EXEMPTION.--All bonds issued hereunder and interest paid thereon and all fees, charges, and other revenues derived by the district from the projects provided by this act are exempt from all taxes by the state or by any political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof; however, any interest, income, or profits on debt obligations issued hereunder are not exempt from the tax imposed by chapter 220. Further, districts are not exempt from the provisions of chapter 212. (7) TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS.--Nothing in this act shall be deemed to affect any benefit tax, maintenance tax, non-ad valorem assessment, ad valorem tax, or special assessment imposed by a community development district as of ]une 21, 1991. Nothing in this act shall be construed to affect any tax or assessment pledged to secure or authorized pursuant to a trust indenture under this chapter, and the district imposing such tax or assessment is hereby authorized to impose such tax or assessment under the terms required by the trust indenture. The terms benefit taxes or maintenance taxes used in this chapter prior to .]une 21, 1991, are redesignated as benefit or maintenance special assessments pursuant to this act, and such terms may be used interchangeably under the terms of an existing trust indenture. (8) STATUS OF ASSESSMENTS.--Benefit special assessments, maintenance special assessments, and special assessments are non-ad valorem assessments as defined by s. 197.3632. (9) ASSESSMENTS CONS-I-[TUTE LIENS; COLLECTION.--Benefit special assessments and maintenance special assessments authorized by this section, and special assessments authorized by s. 190.022, shall constitute a lien on the property against which assessed from the date of imposition thereof until paid, coequal with the lien of state, county, municipal, and school board taxes. These non-ad valorem assessments may be collected, at the district's discretion, by the tax collector pursuant to the provisions of s. 197.363 or s. 197.3632, or in accordance with other collection measures provided by law. (:[0) LAND OWNED BY GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY.--Except as otherwise provided by law, no levy of ad valorem taxes or non-ad valorem assessments under this chapter, or chapter :[70, chapter 197, or otherwise, by a board of a district on property of a governmental entity that is subject to a ground lease as described in s. 190.003(13), shall constitute a lien or encumbrance on the underlying fee interest of such governmental entity. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 11, ch. 84-360; s. 48, ch. 89-169; s. 7, ch. 91-308; s. 40, ch. 99-378; s. 35, ch. 2000-364. ~.90.022 Special assessments.-- (1) The board may levy special assessments for the construction, reconstruction, acquisition, or maintenance of district facilities authorized under this chapter using the procedures for levy and collection provided in chapter :[70 or chapter :[97. (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 170.09, district assessments may be made payable in no more than 30 yearly installments. Page: 26 http:/Iwww.leg.state.fl,uslStatutes/index.cfm?App_rnode= Display_Statute&U RL=Ch0190/ch0190,htm Thursday, May 30, 2002 statules->View Statutes: Online Sunshine History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 12, ch. 84-360; s. 8, ch. 91-308; s. 41, ch. 99-378. 190.023 Zssuance of certificates of indebtedness based on assessments for assessable improvements; assessment bonds.-- (1) The board may, after any assessments for assessable improvements are made, determined, and confirmed as provided in s. 190.022, issue certificates of indebtedness for the amount so assessed against the abutting property or property otherwise benefited, as the case may be; and separate certificates shall be issued against each part or parcel of land or property assessed, which certificates shall state the general nature of the improvement for which the assessment is made. The certificates shall be payable in annual installments in accordance with the installments of the special assessment for which they are issued. The board may determine the interest to be borne by such certificates, in compliance with s. 215.84, and may sell such certificates at either private or public sale and determine the form, manner of execution, and other details of such certificates. The certificates shall recite that they are payable only from the special assessments levied and collected from the part or parcel of land or property against which they are issued. The proceeds of such certificates may be pledged for the payment of principal of and interest on any revenue bonds or general obligation bonds issued to finance in whole or in part such assessable improvement, or, if not so pledged, may be used to pay the cost or part of the cost of such assessable improvements. (2) The district may also issue assessment bonds or other obligations payable from a special fund into which such certificates of indebtedness referred to in the preceding subsection may be deposited; or, if such certificates of indebtedness have not been issued, the district may assign to such special fund for the benefit of the holders of such assessment bonds or other obligations, or to a trustee for such bondholders, the assessment liens provided for in this act unless such certificates of indebtedness or assessment liens have been theretofore pledged for any bonds or other obligations authorized hereunder. In the event of the creation of such special fund and the issuance of such assessment bonds or other obligations, the proceeds of such certificates of indebtedness or assessment liens deposited therein shall be used only for the payment of the assessment bonds or other obligations issued as provided in this section. The district is authorized to covenant with the holders of such assessment bonds or other obligations that it will diligently and faithfully enforce and collect all the special assessments and interest and penalties thereon for which such certificates of indebtedness or assessment liens have been deposited in or assigned to such fund; to foreclose such assessment liens so assigned to such special fund or represented by the certificates of indebtedness deposited in the special fund, after such assessment liens have become delinquent, and deposit the proceeds derived from such foreclosure, including interest and penalties, in such special fund; and to-make any other covenants deemed necessary or advisable in order to properly secure the holders of such assessment bonds or other obligations. (3) The assessment bonds or other obligations issued pursuant to this section shall have such dates of issue and maturity as shall be deemed advisable by the board; however, the maturities of such assessment bonds or other obligations shall not be more than 2 years after the due date of the last installment which will be payable on any of the special assessments for which such assessment liens, or the certificates of indebtedness representing such assessment liens, are assigned to or deposited in such special fund. (4) Such assessment bonds or other obligations issued under this section shall bear such interest as the board may determine, not to exceed a rate which is in compliance with s. 215.84, and shall be executed, shall have such provisions for redemption prior to maturity, shall be sold in the manner and be subject to all of the applicable provisions contained in this act for revenue bonds, except as the same may be inconsistent with the provisions of this section. http://www.leg,state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm ?App_rnode= Display_Statute& URL=Ch01901ch0190.htm Thumday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine (5) All assessment bonds or other obligations issued under the provisions of this act, except certificates of indebtedness issued against separate lots or parcels of land or property as provided in this section, shall be and constitute and shall have all the qualities and incidents of negotiable instruments under the law merchant and the laws of the state. Page: 27 flistory.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 81, ch. 81-259; s. 12, ch. 83-215. 190.024 Tax liens.--All taxes of the district provided for in this act, together with all penalties for default in the payment of the same and all costs in collecting the same, including a reasonable attorney's fee fixed by the court and taxed as a cost in the action brought to enforce payment, shall, from .lanuary 1 for each year the property is liable to assessment and until paid, constitute a lien of equal dignity with the liens for state and county taxes and other taxes of equal dignity with state and county taxes upon all the lands against which such taxes shall be levied. A sale of any of the real property within the district for state and county or other taxes shall not operate to relieve or release the property so sold from the lien for subsequent district taxes or installments of district taxes, which lien may be enforced against such property as though no such sale thereof had been made. The provisions of ss. 194.171, 197.122, 197.333, and 197.432 shall be applicable to district taxes with the same force and effect as if such provisions were expressly set forth in this act. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 33, ch. 82-226; s. 202, ch. 85-342; s. 27, ch. 95-280. 190.025 Payment of taxes and redemption of tax liens by the district; sharing in proceeds of tax sale.-- (1) The district has the right to: (a) Pay any delinquent state, county, district, municipal, or other tax or assessment upon lands located wholly or partially within the boundaries of the district; and (b) To redeem or purchase any tax sales certificates issued or sold on account of any state, county, district, municipal, or other taxes or assessments upon lands located wholly or partially within the boundaries of the district. (2) Delinquent taxes paid, or tax sales certificates redeemed or purchased, by the district, together with all penalties for the default in payment of the same and all costs in collecting the same and a reasonable attorney's fee, shall constitute a lien in favor of the district of equal · dignity with the liens of state and county taxes and other taxes of equal dignity with state and county .taxes upon all the real property against which the taxes were levied. The lien of the district may be foreclosed in the manner provided in this act. (3) ;In any sale of land pursuant to s. 197.542 and amendments thereto, the district may certify to the clerk of the circuit court of the county holding such sale the amount of taxes due to the district upon the lands sought to be sold; and the district shall share in the disbursement of the sales proceeds in accordance with the provisions of this act and under the laws of the state. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 203, ch. 85-342. 190.026 Foreclosure of liens.--Any lien in favor of the district arising under this act may be foreclosed by the district by foreclosure proceedings in the name of the district in a court of competent jurisdiction as provided by general law in like manner as is provided in chapter 173 and amendments thereto; the provisions of that chapter shall be applicable to such proceedings with the same force and effect as if those provisions were expressly set forth in this act. Any act required or authorized to be done by or on behalf of a municipality in htlp:llwww.leg.state.fl.uslStatuteslindex.cfm?App_mode= Display_Statute&U RL=Ch0190/ch0190.htm Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine foreclosure proceedings under chapter 173 may be performed by such officer or agent of the district as the board of supervisors may designate. Such foreclosure proceedings may be brought at any time after the expiration of I year from the date any tax, or installment thereof, becomes delinquent; however no lien shall be foreclosed against any political subdivision or agency of the state. Other legal remedies shall remain available. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407. 190.031 Mandatory use of certain district facilities and services.--To the full extent permitted by law, the district shall require all lands, buildings, premises, persons, firms, and corporatiOns within the district to use the water management and control facilities and water and sewer facilities of the district. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407. 190.033 Bids required.-- (1) No contract shall be let by the board for any goods, supplies, or materials to be purchased when the amount thereof to be paid by the district shall exceed the amount provided in s. 287.017 for category four, unless notice of bids shall be advertised once in a newspaper in general circulation in the county and in the district. Any board seeking to construct or improve a public building, structure, or other public works shall comply with the bidding procedures of s. 255.20 and other applicable general law. In each case, the bid of the lowest responsive and responsible bidder shall be accepted unless all bids are rejected because the bids are too high, or the board determines it is in the best interests of the district to reject all bids. The board may require the bidders to furnish bond with a responsible surety to be approved by the board. Nothing in this section shall prevent the board from undertaking and performing the construction, operation, and maintenance of any project or facility authorized by this act by the employment of labor, material, and machinery. (2) The provisions of the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act, s. 287.055, apply to contracts for engineering, architecture, landscape arChitecture, or registered surveying and mapping services let by the board. (3) Contracts for maintenance services for any district facility or project shall be subject to competitive bidding requirements when the amount thereof to be paid by the district exceeds the amount provided in s. 287.017 for category four. The district shall adopt rules, policies, or procedures establishing competitive bidding procedures for maintenance services. Contracts for other services shall not be subject to competitive bidding unless the district adopts a rule, policy, or procedure applying competitive bidding procedures to said contracts. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 9, ch. 91-308; s. 113, ch. 94-119; s. 42, ch. 99-378. 190.035 Fees, rentals, and charges; procedure for adoption and modifications; minimum revenue requirements.-- (1) The district is authorized to prescribe, fix, establish, and collect rates, fees, rentals, or other charges, hereinafter sometimes referred to as "revenues," and to revise the same from time to time, for the facilities and services furnished by the district, within the limits of the district, including, but not limited to, recreational facilities, water management and control facilities, and water and sewer systems; to recover the costs of making connection with any district facility or system; and to provide for reasonable penalties against any user or property for any such rates, fees, rentals, or other charges that are delinquent. (2) No such rates, fees, rentals, or other charges for any of the facilities or services of the http ://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statuteslindex.cfm ? App_rnode= Display_Statute&U RL=Ch0190/ch0190.htm 28 enter on any lands, waters, or premises of any person, firm, corporation, or body, public or private, within the district limits. Such delinquent fees, rentals, or other charges, together with interest, penalties, and charges for the shutting off and discontinuance and the restoration of such services and facilities and reasonable attorney's fees and other expenses, may be recovered by the district, which may also enforce payment of such delinquent fees, rentals, or other charges by any other lawful method of enforcement. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 82, ch. 81-259. 190.041 Enforcement and penalties.--The board or any aggrieved person may have recourse to such remedies in law and at equity as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the provisions of this act, including injunctive relief to enjoin or restrain any person violating the provisions of this act or any bylaws, resolutions, regulations, rules, codes, or orders adopted under this act. In case any building or structure is erected, constructed, reconstructed, altered, repaired, converted, or maintained, or any building, structure, land, or water is used, in violation of this act or of any code, order, resolution, or other regulation made under authority conferred by this act or under law, the board or any citizen residing in the district may institute any appropriate action or proceeding to prevent such unlawful erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, conversion, maintenance, or use; to restrain, correct, or avoid such violation; to prevent the occupancy of such building, structure, land, or water; and to prevent any illegal act, conduct, business, or use in or about such premises, land, or water. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 83, ch. 81-259. 190.043 Suits against the district.--Any suit or action brought or maintained against the district for damages arising out of tort, including, without limitation, any claim arising upon account of an act causing an injury or loss of property, personal injury, or death, shall be subject to the limitations provided in s. 768.28. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407. 190.044 Exemption of district property from execution.--Ail district property shall be exempt from levy and sale by virtue of an execution, and no execution or other judicial process shall issue against such property, nor shall any judgment against the district be a charge or lien on its property or revenues; however, nothing contained herein shall apply to or limit the rights of bondholders to pursue any remedy for the enforcement of any lien or pledge given by the district in connection with any of the bonds or obligations of the district. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407. 190.046 Termination, contraction, or expansion of district.-- (1) The board may petition to contract or expand the boundaries of a community development district in the following manner: (a) The petition shall contain the same information required by s. 190.005(1)(a)1. and 8. in addition, if the petitioner seeks to expand the district, the petition shall describe the proposed timetable for construction of any district services to the area, the estimated cost of constructing the proposed services, and the designation of the future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for the area by the future land use plan element of the adopted local government local comprehensive plan. If the petitioner seeks to contract the district, the petition shall describe what services and facilities are currently provided by the district to the area being removed, and the designation of the future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for the htr p://www.leg, stat e.fl.u s/Statutes/in dex.c fm?App_rnode= Display_Statute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190.htm Page: 30 Thursday. May 30. 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine f 8~ district shall be fixed until after a public hearing at which all the users of the proposed facility or services or owners, tenants, or occupants served or to be served thereby and all other interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard concerning the proposed rates, fees, rentals, or other charges. Rates, fees, rentals, and other charges shall be adopted under the administrative rulemaking authority of the district, but shall not apply to district leases. Notice of such public hearing setting forth the proposed schedule or schedules of rates, fees, rentals, and other charges shall have been published in a newspaper in the county and of general circulation in the district at least once and at least ;[0 days prior to such public hearing. The rulemaking hearing may be adjourned from time to time. After such hearing, such schedule or schedules, either as initially proposed or as modified or amended, may be finally adopted. A copy of the schedule or schedules of such rates, fees, rentals, or charges as finally adopted shall be kept on file in an office designated by the board and shall be open at all reasonable times to public inspection. The rates, fees, rentals, or charges so fixed for any class of users or property served shall be extended to cover any additional users or properties thereafter served which shall fall in the same class, without the necessity of any notice or hearing. (3) Such rates, fees, rentals, and charges shall be just and equitable and uniform for users of the same class, and when appropriate may be based or computed either upon the amount of service furnished, upon the number of average number of persons residing or working in or otherwise occupying the premises served, or upon any other factor affecting the use of the facilities furnished, or upon any combination of the foregoing factors, as may be determined by the board on an equitable basis. (4) The rates, fees, rentals, or other charges prescribed shall be such as will produce revenues, together with any other assessments, taxes, revenues, or funds available or pledged for such purpose, at least sufficient to provide for the items hereinafter listed, but not necessarily in the order stated: (a) To provide for all expenses of operation and maintenance of such facility or service; (b) To pay when due all bonds and interest thereon for the payment of which such revenues are, or shall have been, pledged or encumbered, including reserves for such purpose; and (c) To provide for any other funds which may be required under the resolution or resolutions authorizing the issuance of bonds pursuant to this act. (5) The board shall have the power to enter into contracts for the use of the projects of the district and with respect to the services and facilities furnished or to be furnished by the district.. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 10, ch. 91-308. 190.036 Recovery of delinquent charges.--Tn the event that any rates, fees, rentals, charges, or delinquent penalties shall not be paid as and when due and shall be in default for 60 days or more, the unpaid balance thereof and all interest accrued thereon, together with reasonable attorney's fees and costs, may be recovered by the district in a civil action. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407. 190.037 Discontinuance of service.--Tn the event the fees, rentals, or other charges for water and sewer services, or either of them, are not paid when due, the board shall have the power, under such reasonable rules and regulations as the board may adopt, to discontinue and shut off both water and sewer services until such fees, rentals, or other charges, including interest, penalties, and charges for the shutting off and discontinuance and the restoration of such water and sewer services or both, are fully paid; and, for such purposes, the board may http://www.leg.st ate. fl .us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode= Display_Statute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190,htm Page: 29 Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine Page: 31 area by the future land element of the adopted local government comprehensive plan. (b) For those districts initially established by county ordinance, the petition for ordinance amendment shall be filed with the county commission. If the land to be included or excluded is, in whole or in part, within the boundaries of a municipality, then the county commission shall not amend the ordinance without municipal approval. A public hearing shall be held in the same manner and with the same public notice as other ordinance amendments. The county commission shall consider the record of the public hearing and the factors set forth in s. 190.005(1)(e) in making its determination to grant or deny the petition for ordinance amendment. (c) For those districts initially established by municipal ordinance pursuant to s. 190.005(2)(e), the municipality shall assume the duties of the county commission set forth in paragraph (b); however, if any of the land to be included or excluded, in whole or in part, is outside the boundaries of the municipality, then the municipality shall not amend its ordinance without county commission approval. (d)l. For those districts initially established by administrative rule pursuant to s. 190.005(1), the petition shall be filed with the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. 2. Prior to filing the petition, the petitioner shall pay a filing fee of $1,500 to the county and to each municipality the boundaries of which are contiguous with or contain all or a portion of the land within the district or the proposed amendment, and submit a copy of the petition to the county and to each such municipality. In addition, if the district is not the petitioner, the petitioner shall file the petition with the district board of supervisors. 3. The county and each municipality shall have the option of holding a public hearing as provided by s. 190.005(1)(c). However, such public hearing shall be limited to consideration of the contents of the petition and whether the petition for amendment should be supported by the county or municipality. 4. The district board of supervisors shall, in lieu of a hearing officer, hold the local public hearing provided for by s. 190.005(1)(d). This local public hearing shall be noticed in the same manner as provided in s. 190.005(1)(d). Within 45 days of the conclusion of the hearing, the district board of supervisors shall transmit to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission the full record of the local hearing, the transcript of the hearing, any resolutions adopted by the local general-purpose governments, and its recommendation whether to grant the petition for amendment. The commission shall then proceed in accordance with s. 190.005(1)(e). 5. A rule amending a district boundary shall describe the land to be added or deleted. (e) In all cases, written consent of all the landowners whose land is to be added to or deleted from the district shall be required. The filing of the petition for expansion or contraction by the district board of supervisors shall constitute consent of the landowners within the district other than of landowners whose land is proposed to be added to or removed from the district. (f)l. During the existence of a district initially established by administrative rule, petitions to amend the boundaries of the district pursuant to paragraphs (a)-(e) shall be limited to a cumulative total of no more than 10 percent of the land in the initial district, and in no event shall all such petitions to amend the boundaries ever encompass more than a total of 250 acres. 2. For districts initially established by county or municipal ordinance, the limitation provided by this paragraph shall be a cumulative total of no more than 50 percent of the land in the initial http:llwww.leg.state.tl.uslStatuteslindex.c'~,rn?App-mode= Display_Statute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190,htm 8 C Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine . district, and in no event shall all such petitions to amend the boundaries ever encompass more than a total of 500 acres. 3. Boundary expansions for districts initially established by county or municipal ordinance shall follow the procedure set forth in paragraph (b) or paragraph (c). (g) Petitions to amend the boundaries of the district which exceed the amount of land specified in paragraph (f) shall be considered petitions to establish a new district and shall follow all of the procedures specified in s. 190.005. (2) The district shall remain in existence unless: (a) The district is merged with another district as provided in subsection (3); (b) All of the specific community development services that it is authorized to perform have been transferred to a general-purpose unit of local government in the manner provided in subsections (4), (5), and (6); or (c) The district is dissolved as provided in subsection (7) or subsection (8). (3) The district may merge with other community development districts upon filing a petition for establishment of a community development district pursuant to s. :[90.005 or may merge with any other special districts upon filing a petition for establishment of a community development district pursuant to s. 190.005. The government formed by a merger involving a community development district pursuant to this section shall assume all indebtedness of, and receive title to, all property owned by the preexisting special districts. Prior to filing said petition, the districts desiring to merge shall enter into a merger agreement and shall provide for the proper allocation of the indebtedness so assumed and [he manner in which said debt shall be retired. The approval of the merger agreement by the board of supervisors elected by the electors of the district shall constitute consent of the landowners within the district. (4) The local general-purpose government within the geographical boundaries of which the district lies may adopt a nonemergency ordinance providing for a plan for the transfer of a specific community development service from a district to the local general-purpose government. The plan must provide for the assumption and guarantee of the district debt that is related to the service by the local general-purpose government and must demonstrate the ability of the local general-purpose government to provide such service: (a) As'efficiently as the district. (b) At a level of quality equal to or higher than the level of quality actually delivered by the district to the users of the service. (c) At a charge equal to or lower than the actual charge by the district to the users of the service. (5) No later than 30 days following the adoption of a transfer plan ordinance, the board of supervisors may file, in the circuit court for the county in which the local general-purpose government that adopted the ordinance is located, a petition seeking review by certiorari of the factual and legal basis for the adoption of the transfer plan ordinance. (6) Upon the transfer of all of the community development services of the district to a general-purpose unit of local government, the district shall be terminated in accordance with a plan of termination which shall be adopted by the board of supervisors and filed with the clerk of the circuit court. http://www.leg, state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfrn?App_mode= Display_Statute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190.him Page: 32 Thursday, May 30, 2002 statutes->View Statutes: Online Sunshine 1 80 Page: 33 (7) If, within 5 years after the effective date of the rule or ordinance creating the district, a landowner has not received a development permit, as defined in chapter 380, on some part or all of the area covered by the district, then the district will be automatically dissolved and a judge of the circuit court shall cause a statement to that effect to be filed in the public records. (8) In the event the district has become inactive pursuant to s. :[89.4044, the board of county commissioners shall be informed and it shall take appropriate action. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; ss. :[3, 19, ch. 84-360; s. 49, ch. 89-169; s. :[1, ch. 9:[-308; s. 43, ch. 99-378. 190.047 Zncorporation or annexation of district.-- (:[) Upon attaining the population standards for incorporation contained in s. 165.061, any district wholly contained within the unincorporated area of a county shall hold a referendum on the question of whether to incorporate. However, any district contiguous to the boundary of a municipality may be annexed to such municipality pursuant to the provisions of chapter 171. (:2) The Department of Community Affairs shall annuaily monitor the status of the district for purposes of carrying out the provisions of this section. History.--s. 14, ch. 84-360. 190.048 Sale of real estate within a district; required disclosure to purchaser.--Subsequent to the establishment of a district under this chapter, each contract for the initial sale of a parcel of real property and each contract for the initial sale of a residential unit within the district shall include, immediately prior to the space reserved in the contract for the signature of the purchaser, the following disclosure statement in boldfaced and conspicuous type which is larger than the type in the remaining text of the contract: "THE (]Name of District/ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAY IMPOSE AND LEVY TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, OR BOTH TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS, ON THIS PROPERTY. THESE TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS PAY THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE COSTS OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES OF THE DISTRICT AND ARE SET ANNUALLY BY THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE DISTRICT. THESE TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS ARE IN ADDITION TO COUNTY AND OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS AND ALL OTHER TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS PROVIDED FOR BY LAW." History,--s. 15, ch. 84-360; s. 3, ch. 90-46; s. 44, ch. 99-378. 190.O485 Notice of establishment.--Within 30 days after the effective date of a rule or ordinance establishing a community development district under this act, the district shall cause to be recorded in the property records in the county in which it is located a "Notice of Establishment of the Community Development District." The notice shall, at a minimum, include the legal description of the district and a copy of the disclosure statement specified in s. 190.048. History.--s. 45, ch. 99-378. 190.049 Special acts prohibited.--Pursuant to s. 11(a)(21), Art. III of the State Constitution, there shall be no special law or general law of local application creating an independent special district which has the powers enumerated in two or more of the paragraphs contained in s. 190.0:[2, unless such district is created pursuant to the provisions of s. 189.404. History.--s. 2, ch. 80-407; s. 16, ch. 84-360; s. 47, ch. 99-378. http:llwww.teg.state.fi.uslStatuteslindex.cfm?App-m°de= Display_Statute&URL=Ch0190/ch0190-htrn Session · C.~_03._O~..e~ · ~ o Znformation Center ~, Lobbyist Znformation Disclaimer: The information on this system is unverified. The journals or printed bills of the respective chambers should be consulted for official purposes. Copyright ©2000-2002 State of Florida. Contact us. Privacy Statement Page: 34 http://www.leg.state,fl.us/$tatutes/index.cfm?App_mode= Display_Statule&URL=Ch0190/ch0'190.htrn COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: X Normal legal Advertisement [] Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dept/Div: Road Maintenance-Landscape Maintenance Person: Bob Petersen Date: 10/31/02 Petition No. (If none, give brief description: Amend Ordinance No. 2001-76- Livingston Road Phase II MSTU Petitioner: (Name & Address): N/A Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before X BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appeari before hear mber 19, 2002) Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): X Naples Daily News [] Other [] Legally Required PROPOSED TEXT: (INCLUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION & COMMON LOCATION & SIZE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2001-76, AS AMENDED, WHICH CREATED THE LIVINGSTON ROAD PHASE II BEATUFICIATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION SIX TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS WHO SERVE ON THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM FIVE TO NINE; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION SIX TO LIMIT MEMBERSHIP ON THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THREE MEMBERS FROM EACH SUBMDIVISION OR COMMUNITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? X Yes 111-1636~-649100 Revie id [~y: (] , Divisio/Administrator or Designee List Altachments: Ordinance No. 2002- [] No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: Date DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to Clerk's Office [] Requesting Division [] Original B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. I~ ° ********************************************************************************* ********************* t , ,,.._.. - z---.. r8F FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: Date of Public hearing: Date Advertised: ORDINANCE NO. 2002- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2001-76, AS AMENDED, WHICH CREATED THE LIVINGSTON ROAD PHASE II BEAUTIFICATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION SIX TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS WHO SERVE ON THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM FIVE TO NINE; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION SIX TO LIMIT MEMBERSIP ON THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THREE MEMBERS FROM EACH SUBDIVISION OR COMMUNITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on December 11, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 2001-76 which created the Livingston Road Phase II Beautification Municipal Service Taxing District; and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 2002-14 to amend Section Six of Ordinance No. 2001-76 to allow property owners and appointed representatives of property owners to serve on the Advisory Committee; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to increase the membership of the Advisory Committee from five (5) members to nine (9) members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SECTION SIX OF ORDINANCE NO. 2001-76, AS AMENDED. Section Six is amended to read as follows: SECTION SIX: CREATION OF THE LIVINGSTON ROAD BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE; AND COMPOSITION PHASE H APPOINTMENT A0 There is hereby created and established the Livingston Road - Phase II Beautification Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the "Committee". The Committee shall consist of fi-ye-(-5) nine (9) members that generally represent the area within the MSTU. Members of the Committee shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board of County Commissioners. Said members shall be permanent residents, property owners or appointed representatives of property owners within the MSTU and electors of Collier County. The Board of County Commissioners shall consider appointment of members from different subdivisions 1 Words Underlined are added; Words Sir'ack Through are deleted. ,8[ or communities within the MSTU. No more than three (3) members shall serve on the Advisory Committee from each subdivision or community, unless there are no other applicants to fill a vacancy. Appointment of members to the Committee shall be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, which resolution shall set forth the date of appointment and the term of office. Members of the Committee shall serve without compensation, but shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for expenses reasonably incurred in the performance of their duties upon prior approval of the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION TWO: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re- lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," or any other appropriate word. SECTION THREE: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ,2002. DATED: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney 2 Words Underlined are added; Words ~*~',~'- ~'~- ..... h ............. ~,. are deleted. r8F November 4, 2002 Georgia Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: AMEND ORDINANCE #2001-76; LIVINGSTON ROAD PHASE II MSTU Dear Georgia: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Friday, November 8, 2002, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk P.O./Account # 111-163647-649100 ?8F NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, November 19, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2001-76, AS AMENDED, WHICH CREATED THE LIVINGSTON ROAD PHASE II BEAUTIFICATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT! PROVINDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION SIX TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS WHO SERVE ON THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM FIVE TO NINE! PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION SIX TO LIMIT MEMBERSHIP ON THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THREE MEMBERS FROM EACH SUBDIVISION OR COMMUNITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk ( SEAL ) Teri Michaels To: Subject: thx 6eorDia! Amend 2001-76.doc legals@naplesnews.com ATTN: GEORGIA AMEND ORDINANCE 2001-76 AMEND ORD. 2001-76.doc.dot Teri Michaels From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@clerk.collier.fl .us Monday, November 04, 2002 11:07 AM Teri Michaels Delivery Status Notification (Relay) ,8F A]-F96954.txt I ATTN: GEORGIA AMEND ORDINAN...This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals~naplesnews.com Teri Michaels From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Monday, November 04, 2002 11:03 AM Teri Michaels Delivered: ATTN: GEORGIA AMEND ORDINANCE 2001-76 ATTN: GEORGIA AMEND ORDINAN... <<ATTN: GEORG;[A AMEND ORDZNANCE 2001-76>> Your message To: legals~naplesnews.com Subject: ATTN: GEORG;EA AMEND ORDT. NANCE 2001-76 Sent: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:07:03 -0500 was delivered to the following recipient(s): legals on Man, 4 Nov 2002 11:02:55 -0500 NmPles Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of PublicatiJ Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHERI LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 111-163646-6 58551473 NOTICE OF INTENT TO State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned su~hority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oa-~h says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the N~ples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says thst the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of I year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant · further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 1t/08 AD SPACE: 135.000 INCH FILED ON: 11/08/02 Signature of AffiantT~ Sworn to and SUbscribed be~-e.~ me tb-~s~/~hday of ~_~C~, . 20~ Personally known by NUI I(;E OF INTENTS- 8 F TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice Is hereby[ giver that On-Tuesday, No vembm' 19, 2002, In th, Boardroom, 3rd Administration Bulldln~ Collier Coun~ Gover, ment Cent~, 3301 E.a Tamlaml Trail, Napm Florida, the Board County Commissions will consider the enac merit of a county hartco. The meeting w commence, at 9'~ A.I The title ~ the propose( Ordlnanco Is as fo~lows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. ~001-76, A-~ AMENDED, WHIi~V~, CREATED THE LI - INGSTON I~OAD PHASE II BEAUTIFICATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT; PRO- FOR VlNDING AMENDMENT TO SEC. TION SIX TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS WHO SERVE ON THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM FIVE TO NINE; PROVID- ING FOR AMENDMENT LIMIT, MEMBERSHIP ON THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THREE MEMBERS FROM EACH SUBDIVI- SION OR COMMUNITY; PROVIDING FOR IN. CLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDI. NANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AN[: SEVF_.RABILITY; ANE PROVIDING FOR A~ EFFECTIVE DATE. Capias of the propo~_d Ordlr~nce ore on file with the Clerk to the Board and ore oval!able f~' Inspec~l..on. All. I .hie. r; OTE:' All persons ~hlneto ~ ~ a.n¥ ~ ~ mum reg,s.- lie 10 be · ir~dUal smeak~lil tlon of an inclvt~lufll m~ak on behalf' of a. nl nlz~l-by the Cha~r_~man_/~ Item. pa-~ons wbhlng ..~_ written ¢ a~_r~n,~. terlols Ii~ClU~l~g m . ..'~ Beard mg~?d~.. must submit ~ala mater Icl ~ minimum of weeks ~lor 10 the .re sl~ve ~Iic .hearing · n any case, Wr.me.n m~a terlals Intenclea considered by th 10 1be oplx*~r., .~e ~,~ ~ {I minimum public heorlng, All ~*lol used In ~ens before ~e Boar( will become a pe.rma- nenf IX~ o~the rer. or~. 10 a~pe~l a cma,.u,, tbe ~i~oard wilt need_~a~ record of fl~e Pr~..cee.a'/ fngs i~r101nlng thereToi ~ ~---efore, maYJ need 10 enture. ~at_al ver~x~m recto', a procoe~lngs rs Which record I OARDO¢ CONW~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COI pTTA, CHAIRMAN nW~GHT E. BROCK, ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 6 2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 2001-76, AS AMENDED, WHICH CREATED THE LIVINGSTON ROAD PHASE II BEAUTIFICATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT; PRO:VIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION SIX TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS WHO SERVE ON THEi ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM~ FIVEI TO NINE; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION SIX TO LIMIT MEMBERSIP ON THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THREE MEMBERS FROM EACH SUBDIVISION OR COMMUNITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 8F WHEREAS, on December 11, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 2001-76 which created the Livingston Road Phase II Beautification Municipal Service Taxing District; and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 2002-14 to amend Section Six of Ordinance No. 2001-76 to allow property owners and appointed representatives of property owners to serve on the Advisory Committee; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to increase the membership of the Advisory Committee from five (5) members to nine (9) members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY,, COMMISSIONERS OF COIJ,IER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SECTION SIX OF ORDINANCE NO. 2001-76, AS AMENDED. Section Six is amended to read as follows: SECTION SIX: CREATION OF THE LIViNGSTON ROAD BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE; AND COMPOSITION PHASE I1 APPOiNTMENT There is hereby created and established the Livingston Road - Phase 1I Beautification Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the "Committee". Bo The Committee shall consist of five--(5) nine (9) members that generally represent the area within the MSTU. Members of the Committee shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the 'Board of County Commissioners. Said members shall be v .................... ~,,,proper owners "' "vt' .........~- ............. rty .,. prcpe ow~u~r-s within the MSTU and electors of Collier County. The Board of County Commissioners shall consider appointment of members from different subdivisions 1 Words Underlined are added; Words e~ ............. ,,~ are deleted. or communities within the MSTU. No more than three (3) members shall serve on the Advisory Committee from each subdivision or community, unless there are no other applicants to fill a vacancy. Appointment of members to the Committee shall be by resolution of the Board of i County Commissioners, which resolution shall set forth the date of appointment and the term of office. Members of the Committee shall serve without compensation, but shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for expenses reasonably incurred in the performance of their duties upon prior approval of the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION TWO: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re- lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," or any other appropriate word. SECTION THREE: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such _hglding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners. of Collier County, Florida, this [ct4h day of/kiovemb0r, 2002. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: H i . &ton" Assistant County Attorney 2 Words Underlined are added; Words Struck Through are deleted. STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2002-62 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 19th day of November, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 21st day of November, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex-officio to Board of County.. C.~.~.i s s ioners Maureen A. Kenyon From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ashton, Heidi Monday, December 16, 2002 10:09 AM Petersen, Bob Kant, Ed; Weigel, David; Maureen A. Kenyon Liv Rd II MSTU Bob, You need to be aware the there are problems with the Ord. that was adopted on Nov. 19, 2002. The clerk dropped the ordinance in the internal mail system on Nov. 21. We received notification that it was filed with the secretary of state on Dec. 2. The filing does not meet the 10 days we have between adoption and filing per statute. This means that the ordinance is not recognized as having been adopted. We called the Secretary of State to determine if anything could be done since the delay occurred through the mail system, .and I was told no. David Weigel will be talking to Ms. Lenanne, Esq. and I will advise you of his determination. I learned from our mail department that certified mail takes two days to go out unless it is flagged as a priority item. Heidi RESOLUTION NO. 02- 479 IOA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING A REVISED SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR RIGHT-OF- WAY PERMITS AS ORIGINALLY SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION 2000-455. WHEREAS, Collier County Resolution No. 2000-455 sets forth the requirements for fees for permits for work within the rights-of-way of Collier County; and WHEREAS, Section E of Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. 2000-455 sets forth the fees to be charged for the various types of permits; and WHEREAS, staff has fully evaluated the costs of reviewing, inspecting, processing and evaluating these right-of-way Permits; and WHEREAS, the new or increased fees for certain development related activities including, but not limited to, driveway connections, re-inspections, open-cut and jack-and-bore construction, utility work, mm lane improvements and irrigation are reflective of the actual cost of processing, reviewing, and inspecting such permit work; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby declares that the fees set forth in the Revised Schedule of Fees for Right-of-way Permits, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "Al", are fair and reasonable sums to be assessed to those who receive the benefits of these services, reviews, and inspections required by the Land Development Code and the County permitting process. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to fees in the Land Development Code is recorded in the minutes of this Board and that the pertinent section of Resolution numbered 2000-455 is hereby superseded by the adoption of this Resolution. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring it. Done the / ~;~ day of x~~ 2002 DwIGHT~E. BROCK, Clerk :':: ~l~eptitY Clerk Approved as to ~o~ and He~di F. Asht~ Assistant Coun~ Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA c- Exhibit "Al" E) Right-of-way Permits Type Residential Non-residential Small* Large* Right-of-way Construction $ 150.00 $ 600.00 $1500.00 Renewal of unexpired or incomplete permit $ 100.00 $ 300.00 $ 750.00 Re-inspection-First $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 Second $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 Third $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 All subsequent inspections $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 Jack-and-Bore $ 250.00 $ 500.00 $1000.00 Open-cut Construction $1000.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 Sprinkler Head Placement in R/W $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 250.00 Turn Lane Construction N/A N/A $1500.00* After-the-Fact Permit 4 X Normal Fee ($6000.00 max) IOA ""' * Right-of-way Permit Notes: Small Commercial Development shall be defined as a non-residential (single- family or duplex) project generating 600 vehicles trips per day or less. o Large Commercial Development shall be defined as a non-residential (single- family or duplex) project generating greater than 600 trips per day. ° A right-of-way use fee of $800.00 per day shall apply to all non-residential projects requiring a lane closure on a major roadway. A major roadway is defined herein as being one of the following Collier County maintained roadways: Roadway Name From T....qo Immokalee Road Tamiami Trail North (US 41) Collier Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Tamiami Trail North (US 41) Collier Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Tamiami Trail North (US 41) Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Tamiami Trail North (US 41) Collier Boulevard Radio Road Airport Road Davis Boulevard Rattlesnake Hammock Road Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Collier Boulevard Tamiami Trail East (SR 90) Davis Boulevard Collier Boulevard Tarniami Trail North (SR 45) Lee County Line Creech Road Davis Boulevard US 41 East Collier Boulevard Goodlettc-Frank Road Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Immokalee Road Airport Road Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Immokalce Road Livingston Road Radio Road Lee County Line Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard Green Boulevard Logan Boulevard Green Boulevard Lee County Line Collier Boulevard Judge Jolley Bridge Immokalee Road SR 29 Everglades City Glades County Line SR 82 SR 29 Lee Count,/Line Page 1 of 2 Exhibit "Al" (continued) o .o The minimum right-of-way use fee shall be for a two-day duration. No refunds of unused fees shall be allowed. Lane use fees shall be calculated by Collier County and shall be due and payable at the time of permit application ifa permit is issued. If a Notice of Intent to Issue a permit is provided by the County in lieu of a permit, then the lane use fee shall be due and payable at the time of issuance of the actual permit. A discount to the right-of-way use fee will apply for work performed during the months of April through January. The discount will be 50% ($400 per day) during the months of January and April, 75% ($200 per day) during the months of May and December, and 87V2 % ($100 per day) during the months of June through November. The calculation of any discount shall be based upon the actual start date of construction. If work continues beyond the originally estimated lane use period, then additional lane use fees shall be due and payable within two working days of notice to the Permittee of such additional fees. Failure to provide the additional fees to the County within three working days of such notice shall be cause for the project to be "red-tagged" and shut down. Lane use fees shall continue to accrue during any period of shutdown and shall be added to the additional lane use fees calculated by Collier County. Additional lane use fees as calculated under Note 5 above shall be assessed at the rate of 150% per day for the additional period. If a third extension of the permit is required, then such extension shall be computed at the rate of 200% per day of such extension. Charges for any period of suspension shall accrue at the higher rate. Page 2 of 2 100 MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Re: November 21, 2002 Margaret Wuerstle, Director Planning Services Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Memorandum of Understanding - City of Marco Island and the Board of County Commissioners to Promote Dialogue Regarding the Impacts Associated with Future Development Along SR 951 and CR 92 Please find enclosed the document as referenced above, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 19, 2002 (Agenda Item #10C). Kindly forward this document to the City of Marco for the required signatures and return the fully executed original to the Minutes and Records Department. If you should have any questions, please call me at 774- 8406. Thank you. Enclosure CLERR ?O ?HE EOARD I~TERO~FICE 4T~ FLOOR ~XT ?240 3116177 OR: 3203 PG: 1853 RECORDED in the OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, PL 01/24/2003 at 09:58AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COPIES 15,00 THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (the "MOU") is entered into this /~;~:~ day of "/)~002, by .a. nd between the CITY OF MARCO ISLAND, FLORIDA, hereinafter called the City," and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, hereinafter called the "County." The City and County are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "Parties" or individually as the "Party." WlTNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City was incorporated by Special Act of the Florida Legislature that was approved on August 28, 1997, and by referendum; and WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, requires all municipal governments to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan, including an Intergovernmental Coordination Element, within three years of incorporation; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Marco Island, Florida adopted the City's Comprehensive Plan on January 22, 2001; and WHEREAS, Policy 1.11.4 of the City's Future Land Use Element states that, "Within two years of Plan adoption the City shall propose an Agreement with Collier County to involve, on a courtesy basis, City review of proposed land development projects along the SR 951 and CR 92 corridors within five miles of the City limits"; and WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that the SR 951 (a/k/a North Collier Boulevard) area is experiencing significant new growth and development; and WHEREAS, the many challenges and opportunities associated with that new and future development could have an adverse impact on the character, economy, infrastructure, services and amenities of Marco Island and Collier County; and WHEREAS, the uncertainty associated with these future challenges, opportunities and impacts related to land development can be assessed and addressed in a proactive manner through enhanced dialogue and communication between the County and the City; and OR: 3203 PG: 1854 lOC WHEREAS, the City and County mutually desire to establish procedures for the review of, and comment on, the other Party's land use petitions involving incorporated and unincorporated areas along SR 951 and CR 92 within and up to five miles beyond the Marco Island city limits; and WHEREAS, such review and comment by the Parties is intended to occur in a timely manner, consistent with the terms of this Memorandum of Understanding, and would be of a courtesy, or non-binding nature. NOW, THEREFORE, in the spirit of intergovernmental coordination and to foster effective and cooperative planning between adjacent local government jurisdictions, the Parties hereto agree to adhere to the following mutual understandings: That all new development with direct access to the SR 951 and CR 92 corridors (i.e., from the intersection of Collier Boulevard and San Marco Road to approximately five miles from the City's boundary) may have a significant impact on the services provided by the Parties, and thus is of special interest to both the City of Marco Island and Collier County. That upon execution of this MOU, staff representatives from both Parties will designate an agreed upon "area of mutual interest" within which the City or County will be afforded a courtesy review of pending land use petitions. That within the "area of mutual interest" the types of land development activities and/or petitions subject to the City's or County's consideration may include the following: Rezonings including Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezones. Amendments to Planned Unit Developments (PUD's). Developments of Regional Impact (DRI's). ., That the City or County will be provided one complete set of required documents to review the subject project/petition. That upon receipt of the documents the City or County, as may be applicable, will have ten (10) working days to complete its courtesy review and compile any verbal or written comments for consideration by the other Party's corresponding staff. 2 OR: 3203 PG: 1855 *** 1CC Any and all verbal or written comments from the City or County are to be considered non-binding on the County or City, and advisory only in nature. For all petitions or projects in the area of mutual interest that are reviewed by one Party and that are then approved by the other Party, the reviewing Party will be provided one stamped set or recorded copy of the other Party's approved plans or documents at no expense. THAT UPON EXECUTION this Memorandum of Understanding shall be recorded in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida at the County's expense. CITY OF MARCO ISLAND, FLORIDA E. Glenn Tucker Chairman Attest: A. William Moss, City Manager Approved as to form and sufficiency for the City of Marco Island, Florida: , Esq. City Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY By' ~ James N. Coletta Chairman ~: Attest: Dwight Clerk of Courts t /Do~utg Clerk ~test as to C~t~'l sl~ature Approved 8s to form 8nd legal sufficiency for Collier County: · Weigel, Esq. (7~¥[~(~ G',~ ~: County Attorney 3 WOR~ ORDER # UC-003 "UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONTRACTING SERVICES" Contract #00-3087, Dated October 10, 2000 This Work Order is for Underground Utility Contractor's Services, subject to the terms and conditions of the Contract referenced above, for wOrk known as: Project: NCWRF Oxidation Ditches Improvements The work is specified in the bid proposal dated November 14, 2002 from D.N. Hi_o~ins, Inc. which is attached hereto and made part of this V~ork Order. In accordance with terms and conditions of the Agreement referenced above, Work Order # UC-003 is assigned to D.N. Hio~llns, Inc. Scope of Work: Task: Provide material, labor, equipment and supervision to perform the NCWRF Oxidation Ditches Improvements, complete and ready for service within no later than January 15, 2003. ~chedule of Work: Substantially complete and ready for beneficial use by Owner no later than January 15, 2003, and finally complete no later than February 28, 2003. Compensation: In accordance with Item 4 of the Agreement, the County will compensate the Firm in accordance with the negotiated lump sum amount proVided in the schedule below. Task: $483,955,00 Total $483,955.00 (Lump Sum) Any change made subsequent to final department approval will be considered an additional service and charged according t,,o an execute~i Change Order as enumerated in Exhibit D of the Agreement. Peter Schalt, Interim Principal Project Mgr. ate Wastewater Department ~'~'(%; ~."' :.?,:,.i,J0se~h B. Cheatt~am, W~'stewater Director ...,? . . ?' .. AT~E~: ' :~, '.; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS D~.g,. ht E..Br~t,..:. ,2 ~'-erk Collier Co~~~~z : ":'t , , ,' By DepUty Clerk'A~test as ~0 Chats,I James N. Coletta, Chairman Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: ~ I Assist~kt C0u~iy Attorney Date: 11/15/02 ATTEST: (Corporate Secretary) R. Suzanne Hawker, Corporate Secretary Type Name and Title Daniel N. Hi.q,qins, Vice President D,N. Higgins, Inc. By: (or) witnesses (2) (1) (2) Signature Signature Print Name Print Name FUND: 413 COST CENTER: 263613 OBJECT CODE: 763100 Project No. 73251 FUND: 413 COST CENTER: 263613 OBJECT CODE: 763100 Project No. 73251 WORK ORDER # HM-FT-02-11 Agreement for Fixed Term Professional Engineering Services Dated April 10, 2001 (Contract #00-3119) 10G This Work Order is for professional engineering services for work known as (Title) NCWRF Oxidation Ditches Improvements. (Reason for Proiect) To improve reliability and sewa,qe treatment capacity at the NCWRF Oxidation Ditches. The work is specified in the proposal dated November 14, 2002, which is attached hereto and made a part of this Work Order. In accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above, Work Order #HM-FT-02-11 is assigned to HoleMontes. Scope of Work: (List all tasks: Task 1, Task 2, etc.) Task 1: Assistance during construction Task 2: Follow up services Schedule of Work: Complete all work no later April 30, 2003. Compensation: In accordance with Article Five of the Agreement, the County will compensate the Firm in accordance with the negotiated lump sum amount indicated in the schedule below (if a task is time and material, so indicate and use the established hourly rate(s) as enumerated in Schedule "A" of the Agreement). Task'One:' ' $ 90,000 T&~/I Task Two $ 40,000 T&M Total Fee ....... --) $130~000 T&M Any change within monetary authority of this Work Order made subsequent to final department approval will be considered an additional service and charged according to Schedule "A" of the Agreement. Peter, Schalt,, EMP,., Interim Principal Proj. Mgr. ' ~ate__ REVIEWED..~Y:' /~?' ¢ ~i //~ ~, ~:;,;~ Josep~ Cheatham, Wa~'tewater Director Da~e ATTES~~ :-.. ~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS D~']gh~:;Oro:Ck, C~rk Collier Countv~Florida/ '-~tZp~f'p, epu~,:;Cl6r~ Attest as to Chat~'l . ta, Chairman A,,.ov a to ,orm Legal Sufficiency: ~ f Asdiitant CoUnty Attorney HoleMontes ATTEST: Signature John E. ~o[sk~ Sdc~e~a~y/T~easu~e~ Type Name and Title (or) witnesses (2) (~) Signature Print Name (2) Signature Print Name COLLIER COUNTY V. ROBERTO BOLLT Case No. 00-2433-CA Parcel No. 101 lOJ Deposit 9/28/00 PARENT: COLrNTY 8 ACRES OWNER 2800 ACRES TAKE: 1 ACRE 1 ACRE RENLa, INDER: 7 ACRES 2799 ACRES VALLE OF LAND IN TAKE: 43,560 x 1 = $43,600 43,560 x 10 = $435,600 DAMAGES: NONE NONE IMPROVEMENTS: NONE NONE ZONING: CN PART OF ORANGETREE PUD CN PART OF ORANGETREE PUD USE: VACANT VACANT H & B USE: COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION: RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA DISTRICT URBAN (INCORRECT) TOTAL: $43.600 $435.600 WORK ORDER # PBS - 02-06 "General Contractor's Services" RFP # 02 - 3349, Dated June, 2002 This Work Order is for General Contracting Services, subject to the terms and conditions of the Contract referenced above, for Work known as: PROJECT: Immokalee Airport Park: The Restoration of two (2) Restroom building, Band shell and Cookout structure. The upgrading of the electrical and water services. The repair of parking lot, fencing and site work as specified in the proposal dated September 25, 2002 from Professional Building Systems, General Contractors, which is attached hereto and made part of this Work Order in accordance with Terms and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above. Work Order # PBS- 02- 06 is assigned to Professional Building Systems, General Contractors. Scope: The Contractor to supply all labor and material for the repair of the various buildings, site work and parking lot. The work includes restroom restoration with new fixtures, roof replacement with new metal, electrical upgrading with new under ground conduits, fence replacement at the west and north elevations, re-grading of existing parking lot and adding new compacted shell surface and general site work as shown on Contract Drawings and General Notes. Provide all required temporary fencing to protect the public. Schedule of Work: Complete within 90 calendar days from date of issued Permit and Notice to Proceed. Compensation: In accordance with Item3 of the Agreement, the County will compensate the Firm in accordance with the lump amount provided in the schedule b TASK l(Base Bid) $159,398.00 Site (Alt. 1) $ 7,129.00 Site (Alt. 2) $ 5,445.00 Site (Alt. 3) $ 1,175.00 Electrical (Alt. 1) $ 10,065.00 Plumbing (Alt. 1) $ 6,949.00 TOTAL $190,161.00 Any change made subsequent to final department approval will be considered an additional service and charged to an executed Change Order as enumerated in Exhibit D of the Agreement. PREPARED BY:,~~-~ Antonio Ruberto, Project Manager Parks- and Rec, reatiola"D--0part,ment 1V~aTl~ Ramsey, Direct~ ] Parks and Recreation De'l~fl.~ent ATTEST: ~-, Dwight E}~r~, Clerk, y: '" ' ~"-Deputy ulerK --Date BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS By: /~---'~-~- ¢-tF-~-'~- JAMES N. COLETTA, Chairman Attest as to Chairman'S signature onl$. Approved at to form A~ciency R~bert 2ach, -- Assistant County Attorney ~dent Type/Print Name and Title Affix the" (Corporate Seal)}" OR Type/Print "( Corporate Seal)" ATTEST: ( Corporation Secretary) By: Typed Name and Title (Print N/time) ,.3 Signature (Print Name) RESOLUTION NO. 02-4 6 6 1 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN NAPLES GATEWAY PHASE I, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on March 14, 2000 approved the plat of Naples Gateway Phase I for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended), and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Naples Gateway Phase I, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Naples Gateway property- owners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DWIGHT ~ZIR~CK, CLERK I~ature. ~pprovea as to to~ and legal Pmrick G. White Assist~t Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: '~~~,~'~ ~ J~S N. COLE~FT~, CI-~A~AN RESOLUTION NO. 02- 4 6 7 16A 2 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN CATAMARAN COURT AT TARPON COVE, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND WATER SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE THE AND NOT THE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on March 3, 1999 approved the plat of Catamaran Court at Tarpon Cove for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended), and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Review Department of Community Development Services has inspected the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORDA, that final acceptance is hereby granted for those roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in Catamaran Court at Tarpon Cove, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Tarpon Cove homeowners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. .~TTEST:' el,, W'IGHT.F_5. BI~OCK, CLERK Approve~ as t~io~ and l~gal Patrick G. White Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER~/~A By: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN 16A 3 RESOLUTION NO. 02- 4 6 8 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN TARPON COVE, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on January 28, 1997 approved the plat of Tarpon Cove for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended), and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is hereby granted for those roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in Tarpon Cove, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Tarpon Cove homeowners association. ';DWIGI~'I!E:'BROCK; CLE~ Attest as to Chalm~'$ signatuKe Approved as to ~o~ ~d legal Patrick G.~hite' Assistant Collier Co~ty Attorney This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: JA~f~~AN RESOLUTION NO. 02- 4 6 9 16A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN PELICAN MARSH UNIT TWENTY-TWO, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on January 12, 1999 approved the plat of Pelican Marsh Unit Twenty-Two for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended), and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is hereby granted for those roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in Pelican Marsh Unit Twenty-Two, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Pelican Marsh Community Development District. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. . pW[ ~,C~t .T'E. BROCK, CLERK Attest as to Chairman's signature ~3nl~.~ ~proved as m to~ ~a legal Pmfick G. White Assist~t Collier Co~ty Mtomey BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: J~S N. COLI~TTX, CI~AIRMAN COLLIER COUlqT~ LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CONSTRUCTION AND MA/NTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS TI-1/S CONSTRUCTION AND lVXAI~TENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION · PROVEMENTS entered into this /~'2C~ day of '~%~-t~ ,~_ ._ between ,'~f~0 f~/;~ hereinai%er referred to as"Develo'~r," and the ~Board of County Commissioners ~ .i~. ~o~ .Collier County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "Board." KECITALS: A. Developer has, simultaneously wit~ the delivery of this Agreement, applied for the B. Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Developer to post appropriate guarantees for the con~t~action of the improvements required by said subdi- vision regulations, said guarantees to be incorporated in a bonded agreement for the construc- tion of the required improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual covenantz hereinafter set forth, Developer and the Board do hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Developer will c~use to be constructed: within /g~ months from the date of approval ~aid subdivision plat, said improve- aents her n a r fe= as th. p omen : 2.' "Deve~.oper 'hereWith.. tenders its 'SubdiVision performance serum4 .~ · . .'- t~ ~er~o a~ ~it~!'..:~ by remrence rmme a par~ b~r~ m the .> : ... ' am°u~t of $ ~i.:"~:~."~'(~.'~0unt represents 10% .of the ~otal c. on- .. --. '....'- . . .'" ~." - In the event of-Sefautt'b~':the DeVeloper or failure of the Developer to - .. comple~ SUch ~rO~emen~ wire.in:the time required by t~be Land De- ./' . ~ velOPmen~ code~ Collie~'CoUnW, may call upon the subdivision per~or- .....:. ' : mance security to"~ ~atisfactorY'completion Of the required improve- · ' 4. The requiredimpr°Veme~ts ~ not'be considered complete until a stat~ ment Of substantial C°mpIetion'b3~ DeveloPer's engineer alon~ with the i'mai project records have been furnished to be reviewed and approved by the Development ~ervices Director for compliance with the Collier County Land Development ~de. §. The Development f~ervices Director s]~H, within sixty (~0) days of receipt of the statement of suhsta~~-~j completion, either, a) notify the Developer in writin~ of his preHm~uary approval of the improvements; or b) notify the Developer in ~ritin~ of his refusal to approve illlprovements, there- with specifyin~those conditions which the Developer must fulfi~ in order to obtain the Director's approval of the improvements. However, in no No. ~ APPENDIX A-STANDARD LEGAL DOCUMENTS 16 5 event shall the Development Services Director refuse preliminary ap- proval of the improvements if they are in fac: constructed and subm/tted for approval in accordance with the requirements o£ this Agreement. 6. The Developer shall maintain all required improvements for a minimum period of one year after preliminary approval by the DevelOpment Ser- vices Director. After the one year maintenance period by the Developer has terminated, the Developer shall petition the Development Services Director to inspect the required improvements. The Development Ser- vices Director or his designee shall inspect the improvements and, if found to be still in compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code as reflected by final approval by the Board, the Board shall release the remaining 10% of the subdivision performance secur/ty. The Devel- oper's responsibility for maintenance of the required improvements shall continue unless or unt/l the Board accepts maintenance responsibility for and by the County. 7. Six (6) months after the e~ecution of this Agreement and once within every six (6) months thereafter the Developer may request the Develop- ment Services Director to reduce the dollar amount of the subdivision performance security on the basis of work complete, Each request for a · reduction in the dollar amount of the subdivision performance security shall be accompanied by a statement of substantial completion by the Developer's engineer together with the project records necessary for re- view by the Development Services Director. ?he Development Services Director nmy grant the request £or a reduction in the amount of the · subdivision performance security for the improvements completed as of the date of the request. 8. In the event the Developer shall fail or neglect to fulfflI its obligations under this Agreement,.upon certification of such failure, the County Ad- ministrator may call upon the subdivision performance security to secure satisfactory completion, repair ~nd maintenance of the required improve- ments. The Board shall'have the i'ight to construct and maintain, or cause to be constructed, or maintained, pursuant to public advertisement and receipt and acceptance, of bids, the improvements required herein. The Developer, as principal under the subdivision performance security, shall be liable to pay and to indemnify the Board, upon completion of such construction, the i-mai total cost to the Board thereof, including, but not limited to, engineering, legal and contingent costs, together with any damages, either direct or consequential, which the Board may sustain on account of the failure of the Developer to fulfill all of the provisions of this Agreement. 9. All of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained are an shall be binding upon the Developer and the respective successors and assigns of the Developer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board and the Developer have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives this ?~ day of'-;) e~,o ~,~.z. Supp. No. I LDCA:ll COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SIGNE..~EALED AND DELIVERED IN By: ~ . . Printed or Typed Name BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF co cx 16A5 COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 2002-022 ISSUER: ("hereinafter Issuer") PLACE OF EXPIRY: DATE OF EXPIRY: APPLICANT: BENEFICIARY: ("hereinafter Beneficiary") AMOUNT: Peninsula Bank Attn: Karen Knight Miller, VP 3100 McCall Road South Englewood, FL 34224 At Issuer's counters. This Credit shall be valid until December 13, 2003, and shall thereafter be automatically renewed for successive one-year pedods on the anniversary of its issue unless, at least sixty (60) days prior to any such anniversary, the Issuer notifies the Beneficiary in writing by registered mail that the Issuer elects not to so renew this Credit. American Funding and Service Corp., as Trustee under Land Trust No. 330, 720 Goodlette Road #305, Naples, FL 34102 The Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Flodda, c/o Office of the County Attorney, Collier County Courthouse Complex, Naples, Flodda $711,238.00 (up to an aggregate thereof) CREDIT AVAILABLE WITH: Issuer BY: Payment against documents detailed herein and Beneficiary's drafts at sight drawn on the Issuer. DOCUMENTS REQUIRED: AVAILABLE BY BENEFICIARY'S DRAFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON THE ISSUER AND ACCOMPANIED BY THE BENEFICIARY'S STATEMENT PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY THE COUNTY MANAGER, CERTIFYING THAT: "American Funding and Service Corp., as Trustee under Land Trust No. 330, has failed to construct and/or maintain the improvements associated with that certain plat of a subdivision known as Hemingway Place or a final inspection necessary to Collier County has not been performed pdor to the date of expiry, and satisfactory alternative performance security has not been provided to and formally accepted by the Beneficiary." DRAFT(S) DRAWN UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT MUST BE MARKED: "Drawn under Peninsula Bank Credit No. 2002-022 dated December 13, 2002. The original Letter of Credit and all amendments, if any, must be presented for proper endorsement. This letter of Credit sets forth in full the terms of the Issuer's undertaking and such undertaking shall not in any way be modified, amended, or amplified by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement referenced to herein or in which this Letter of Credit relates, and any such reference shall not be deemed to incorporate herein by reference any document, instrument or agreement. Issuer hereby engages with Beneficiary that draft(s) drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this Letter of Credit will be duly honored by Issuer if presented within the validity of this Credit. APPENDIX A - STANDARD LEGAL DOCUMENTS This Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1983 Revision) International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 400. PENINSULA BANK Its Vice President 16A 6 RESOLUTION NO. 02- 4 7 0 RES OLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN PINE AIR LAKES UNIT ONE, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPTING THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on April 4, 1995 approved the plat of Pine Air Lakes for recording; and WHEREAS, the developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended); and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17), and WHEREAS, the developer has now requested final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Pine Air Lakes Unit One, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the homeowners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. :^X:T:V, % CO ZV, -DWIGHT E:~OCK, GLE~ Ag~gfs ~}~ ~d legal Pathck G. White Assist~t Collier County Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 02- 4 71 7 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN STONEBRIDGE UNIT THREE, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on December 5, 1995 approved the plat of Stonebridge Unit Three for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended), and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is hereby granted for those roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in Stonebridge Unit Three, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Stonebridge homeowners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ATTEgT.' ~!1,~I,~ ::DWiGI-LT E.~bRocK, CLERK .. .;-:q -., sufficiency: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: JAI~N: C~I~/~TT~,----~'~MAN Patri~: 0'7. ~hite ~ Assistant Collier County Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 02- 4 7 2 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN HUNTINGTON LAKES UNIT TWO, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on September 3, 1996 approved the plat of Huntington Lakes Unit Two for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended), and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Huntington Lakes Unit Two, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Huntington Lakes homeowners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATE: A~TT, E,ST? ~ttest as s~gnature ~ppmvcd as to [o~ patdc~ ~it~' Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER~/~~~/,)~/ By: ~~'~ 'rf- ~ -~1~// JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN RESOLUTION NO. 02- 4 7 3 9 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN HUNTINGTON LAKES UNIT THREE, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on September 23, 1997 approved the plat of Huntington Lakes Unit Three for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended), and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Huntington Lakes Unit Three, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Huntington Lakes homeowners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAg,~S N. COLETTA, CI~I'~AN Approved as to form and legal Patrick G. White Assistant Collier County Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 02- 4 7 4 16AlO RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN HUNTINGTON LAKES UNIT FOUR, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on May 5, 1998 approved the plat of Huntington Lakes Unit Four for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended), and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Huntington Lakes Unit Four, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Huntington Lakes homeowners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. :_. ', ~'.., ,. ATeii~EST.5: ~OU~ E. BROCK, CLE~ .' .... :'1/ , l Attest as to ~al~.8 stgna~re only. Approved as to fo~ ~d legal Assistant Collier Co~ty Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: J~,~C -~AN Permit No. PERMIT FOR CARNIVAL EXHIBITION 16All CP-2002-10 STATE OF FLORIDA · COUNTY OF COLLIER: WHEREAS, Pastor Ettore Rubin, of Our Lady Of Guadalupe Catholic Church, has made application to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, for a permit to conduct a carnival; and WHEREAS, Pastor Ettore Rubin, of Our Lady Of Guadalupe Catholic Church, has presented to the Board sufficient evidence that all criteria for the issuance of a permit to conduct a carnival as set forth in Chapter 10, Article II, Amusements and Entertainments, of the Collier County Code have been satisfied and that such carnival exhibition will be conducted according to lawful requirements and conditions; and WHEREAS, said Pastor Ettore Rubin, of Our Lady Of Guadalupe Catholic Church, has requested a waiver of the Surety Bond. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS PERMIT IS HEREBY GRANTED TO OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CATHOLIC CHURCH, to conduct a carnival from November 27th through December 1, 2002, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the petitioner's application and all related documents, attached hereto and incorporated herein for the following described property: (See attached Exhibit "A") The request for waiver of Surety Bond is hereby approved. WITNESS my hand as Chairman of said Board and Seal of said County, attested by the - ?l~rk~.9:f Courts in and for said County this / ~,~ day of ~~2002. ATTEST: DWIGH~r E, BROCK, CLERK Attest as to Chairman' s Legal Sufficiency: Mhjori M. ~tudent Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLL__/ JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN CARNY-2002-AR-3335/SM/lo NOTE: PETITION NO. Please read reverse side Copy: Zoning Director 1 6 /~t 1 1 before completing this Copy: Petitioner Petition. Copy: (2) County Manager CARNIVAL OPERATION PETITION ~f~ y,,.._ ~_,.~-- ~/P_- 3~,~DATE: October 30, 2002 PETITIONER'S NAME: 'Our Lady of Guadalupe Catholic Church PETITIONER' S ADDRESS: 207 South 9~ Street, Immokalee, Florida 34142 TELEPHONE: (239)657-2666 or 657-6303 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Ettore Rubin, c.s. PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS: 207 South 9th Street, Immokalee, Florida 34142 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. GENERAL LOCATION: TELEPHONE: (239)657-2666 or 657-6303 SE¼, NE¼ of the SW¼ of Section 4, Township 47 1 block South of State Road 29 on 9t~ Street in Immokalee, Florida. CURRENT ZONING: ':RMF-6 CURRENT USE: Place of worship NATURE OF PETITION: A request is hereby made for a permit from Collier County to hold our annual carnival from November 27 thru December 1, 2002. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN THIS PETITION. (FOR EXPLANATION, SEE REVERSE SIDE.) 3.a. Yes 3.e.1) Yes 3.b. Yes 3.e.2) Yes 3.c. Yes 3.e.3) Yes 3.d Yes Comments: 3.e.4) Yes 3.e.7) Yes 3.e.5). Yes 3.e.8). Yes 3.e.6) Yes 3.e.9) Yes SIOI~ATURE OF-PE FITIONER DATE REVIEWED by Board of County Commissioners: Approved: Conditions of Approval: Disapproved: Exhibit "A" SIGNATURE OF COUNTY MANAGER ection 3a. Section 3b. Section 3c. Section 3e. F. 16All CARNIVAL OPERATION PETITION October 30, 2002 A surety bond. Applicant is requesting a waiver of the surety bond due to the annual carnival being held on the Church grounds. Evidence of current public liability is herein attached to this petition from both our Church and the Tolve Presentations, Inc. Permit fee of $275.00 (Two Hundred Seventy-Five dollars) is herein attached per check. Information as you requested: Tolve Presentation, Inc., of 269 Orient Way Lyndhurst, New Jersey 07071, will provide the carnival rides again this year. Our Lady of Guadalupe Catholic Church, 207 South 9t~ Street, Immokalee, Florida 34142, will sponsor said carnival. As the Bishop's representative, Rev. Ettore Rubin, c.s., is solely responsible of the Church affairs. FOOD STANDS: Light foremostly Mexican dishes, hamburgers, hot dogs, each being run by a team of five (5) persons. SOFT DRINKS will be served from two (2) booths separated by food stands. NO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES will be sold or allowed on the church grounds. MECHANICAL RIDES for children and adults, since the availability of rides contingents upon what other areas Tolve Presentation, Inc. is working at the time, it is almost impossible to know which specific fides will be offered. GAMES OF SKILL or chance will be the type not prohibited by Florida State law. ACTIVITIES: a. Games of skill will be provided by Tolve Presentation, Inc. who will pay a fee percentage of the earnings. b. Games run by Our Lady of Guadalupe: 1. Loteria (Mexican Bingo) Names and Social Security numbers of each person that is responsible for a booth. Since neither Mr. Tolve nor I, Father Ettore Rubin, will know ahead of time which particular worker will be at the carnival, I am unable to provide, at this time, their names or Social Security numbers. Our parishioners are as follows: Kitqhen and Food Booths NAME Gerardo Alfaro Natividad Ayala Adan Contreras Anastacio Contreras Gloria Contreras Norrna Contreras Sylvia Contreras Natividad Gamez EMPLOYEE OR PARISHIONER Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner SOC. SECURITY 449-80-9292 455-64-2495 463-58-6585 460-65-4373 263-64-4965 451-64-6861 265-73-9524 387-42-2946 6, ,11 10. 11. Kitchen and Food Booths (Cont'd) EMPLOYEE OR NAME Dahlia Garcia Salvador Garcia Anis Gedeon Irma Gomez Maurilio Gomez Aurora Hernandez Satumino Hernandez Artemio Lozano Laura Lozano Andres Marquez Benjamin Marquez Isabel Marquez Jos~ A. Marquez Jose M. Marquez Mafia Marquez Nereida Marquez Nora M. Marquez Rueben Marquez Digna Martinez Rosa Martinez Lucy Ortiz Neflili Ortiz PARISHIONER Parishioner Parishioner Church employee Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Church employee Parishioner Church employee Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner Parishioner SOC. SECURITY 262-83-0179 267-91-3047 594-39-3280 595-54-6020 460-33-839! 460-33-9200 267-62-9181 263-68-1167 534-84-4685 592-05-086] 266-93-7617 266-79-7909 092-42-8226 261-04-5155 266-93-8520 264-77-8255 092-42-8033 261-97-4679 265-13-4519 463-72-1256 581-86-0094 For a description and sketch of the site, see next page. A water fountain is located in our parish hall, one outSide the Soup Kitchen and another in the Church. We have eight (8) functioning toilets in different church buildings and we will rent eight (8) portable toilets for the duration of the carnival. There are four (4) street lights in front of the church, eight (8) in the back and one (1) in the front of, the Soup Kitchen. Power will be supplied by a generator from Tolve Presentations, Inc. for their own rides. Plans for g~irbage, debris and sewerage disposal is as follows. Since our restrooms are permanently installed, we foresee no sewerage problems in this area. The portables will be serviced every day. The food concession booths will operate out of the "Soup Kitchen" and will enable us to use the facilities. Garbage and debris will be taken by truck to the local landfill daily. We have 3 dumpsters and 20 - 30 gallons garbage cans. The cans will be placed around the grounds. Diamond Security has been contacted. Denise L. Dufault, for Nicholas J. Lukacovic, Pres. signed contract with Father Ettore Rubin, c.s. This Contract states that there will be five (5) armed, uniformed and certified officers for security to our carnival. Fire extinguishers are available on the property for minor fires. The carnival shall be held from Wednesday, November 27, 2002 through Sunday, December 1, 2002. The hours of the carnival shall be from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. As a legal administrator of Our Lady of Guadalupe Catholic Church, I hereby give written consent for the carnival to be held on the Church grounds from November 27 through December i, 2002. A ORD Client#: 87 DIOVEN CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE PRODUCER ARTHUR J GALLAGHER & CO 8200 NW 41st Street, Ste. 200 MIAMI, FL 33166 305 592-6080 OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CHURCH DIOCESE OF VENICE P. O. BOX 2006 VENICE, FLORIDA 34284 INSURED THIS C~_~¥iFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MA ii~-R OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER A: UNITED NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. INSURER B: TNCRRG INSURER C: SAFETY NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. INSURER D: INSURER E: ~UV I::I~A~ I:;~ THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ~OI. JCY EFFECTIVE POUCY EXPIRATION INSR pnf I~.y NUMBER DATE {MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY) UMITS LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE A GENERAL LIABILITY CP65197-03 04/01/02 04/01/03 EACH OCCURRENCE 21,000,000 ~ X COMMERCIALGENERALLIABILrI~ 1053-03 04/01/02 04/01/03 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $1NCLUDED '1 CLAIMS MADE ~ OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) sNIL B I PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $1 t090~000 GENERAL AGGREGATE SN/A PRODUCTS -COMP/OPAGG $1x000~000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIM FF N:~t. IES PER: t POLICY ~--~PRO'JECT ~'-1LOc A AUTOMOBILE LIABII.IT~ CP65197-03 04/0tl02 04/01/03 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 21,000,000 & X ANYAUTO 1053-03 04/01102 04/01/03 (La. accident) a X ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ X SCHEDULED AUTOS X I HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ X NON-OWNED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ GARAGE LIABIMTY t ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EAACC AUTO ONLY: AGG $ EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIABIMTY I OCCUR ~'-~ CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ $ DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION $ WC STATU- [ OTH- A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND CP65t97-03 04101/02 04/01/03 X TORY LIMITS, ER EMPLOYERS' UABIETY SP4329-FL-03 0410tl02 04101103 E.L EACH ACCIDENT $17000,000 & C E.L DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 E.L DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT 21,000,000 OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS RE: THANKSGIVING CARNIVAL ON NOVEMBER 27-DECEMBER 1, 2002. CERTIFICATE HOLDER IS NAMED AS ADDITIONAL INSURE AS RESPECTS OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CARNIVAL. OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE 207 SOUTH 9TH STREET, IMMOKALEE, FL 34142 CERTIFICATE HOLDER I I AD D FrlONAL INSURED ;INSURER LETFE R: COLLIER COUNTY ACORD 25-S (7/97) 1 of 2 #S42943/M37884 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANYOFTHE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION i DATE TREREOF~ THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TOMAIL30~DAYSWRITTEN NOTICETOTHE CERTIFICATE HOLDERNAMED TOTHE LEFT, BUTFAJLURE TODOSOSHALL IMPOSE NOOBLIGATION OR LIABILITYOF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. A VE GXC ® ACORD CORPORATION ~mAllied Specialty Insurance, Inc 10451 Gulf Blvd. P.O. ~ox 67008 Treasure Island, FL 33736-7008 800/237-3355 Tolve Presenta~b~s, Inc. dba Third Generation 8628 Constitution Drive Homestead FL 33034 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE [ '"':'"~-~/2~/o= T.~ =mm.cam ,. ~ ~ ~ ~. o~ I~O~T, ON ~LY AND ~N~ NO .I=H~ U.~ ~ CERTIFICA~ HOLDER. THI. CERTWICATE DOE8 I~T ANEND, EXTEND OR AL'I~R THE I~V~I~QE AFFOI~DmD IIy'FHle POLl( :11=~ ~LC~N. IN~RER~ AFFORDIN(~ COVERAGE NAIC # ~,^: T.H.E. Insurance company IN 8U'4ER B: IN~IJ~f,R ~: IN~L~RER O: ~RAQE~, P ~uw ' M2MF1490 04/17/02 04/17/03 ~n~rm i : [ ~.E~~ ,10,000,000 - ~ ~ 'M2MF1490 04/17/02 0&/17/03 c~ s 500,000 NI~AU~ ~ILY ~ - {~r ~ -[~-~~ ~% ....... :____ , "~ * "' ' ~*~1 [~:~ ...... Ef~ective fr~ 10/2~/02 Additional Insured: O~ ~Y OF GU~~E t~ugh 12/03/02 207 S. 9TH S~EET I~O~EE, FL 33934 ~: ~~ FESTIV~ CER~F~aTEHOLDER OUR LADY OF GUADALAPE 207 S. 9TH STREET IMMOKALEE, FL 3393& ACOrn3 ~ CAIICAI I Al'lOll 9415428880 DIAMOND INGEST INC. 109 P84 SEP 25 'l~ 14:45 Al l)lllk, THll ~.~R1/ll&li it ~ Al A MATIII ~ IiITIOti ONLY )J~lO CX)MP~IE$ AFFCXRDING COVERAGE: i c~J,~, A EVANST~ :L'N~(:~ CO.ANY , ECLIPSE c~-~ C 5050 ~ST L~ON ~~ ~ .......................................................................................................................... ~ - ~ .................... ~ ............................................... . ..................... I A"'~-i~~ ~-~0-0~ 0~70~/02 ~ 0,/0~/03 ?~ ........................... ~""~':' 0'~,;"0' ~'~' ~ ~ fWC-T~C 0110-10193 ~10/01/01 ~10/01/02~ ...................................... ~ .................................... ONLY THOSE EMPLOYIES LEASED TO B~T ~ B17BCONTEACTO]~8 OF: DIAMOND IRVESTZGATIONS, INC. ~ DIAMOND SllCUi~ITg ADDED: 2/21/02 FAX DZAMONDZNV~STX~TZONB AND D XAMOND SICU~ZT~ 1314 CAP! CO~J~L PKNY I, BTE 203 C.I~s" 00~AL, FL 3390~-96&3 I~FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Fooa ~,rog,am - Other Food Service Issued to: Our Lady Of Guadalupe Cath.Chu For: Guadalupe Center 211 S 9th St Immokalee , FL 34143 Capacity: 88 Mailed to: Guadalupe Center P O Box 1053 Immokalee , FL 34143 502110 Permit Number: 11-48-00180 'C:ounty: COLLIER Issue Date: 10/1/02 Amount Paid: $ 160.00 Paid Date: 7/30/02 Permit Expires On: September 30, 2003 Issued by:. Envimnrnental Health & Engineering 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 (239) 403-2499 DISPLAY IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE Thomas G. VValker, P.E. Environmental Health Administrator ORIGINAL - CUSTOMER (Non-Transferable) that mai ~m ~ mm ~ t OUTH 6 ,11 BUILDING FUND 207 SOUTH 9TH STREET 'r', /3 IMMOKALEE, FL .~4142 raytoth ' - - r- ' ~'~7 ,. · Florida F~_R Community Imbibe: FL 3414-2-2202 n ,,~ ~ ~, ~o~,~ ~~ .... ~~~_.:_ ........ SPONSOR NOTIFICATION FORM FOR TEMPORARY EVENTS: Name of event Our Lady of Guadalupe Catholic Church Annual Carnival Address of event 219 South 9' Street, Immokalee, Florida 34142 Date(s) of event November 27-December 1, 2002 Sponsor of event Our Lady of Guadalupe Catholic Church Person in charge of food s~rvice Ettore Rubin, c.s. Number of food and beverage booths 12 Estimated number of attenders expected at the event at one time? 3,000 Number of toilets to be provided: Portable: Male ( Permanent: Male ( Method of toilet waste disposal: Hours of operation 16 ,11 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Phone (239)657-2666 or 657-6303 5 ) Female(5 ) 8 ) Female( 8 ) Immokalee Water & Sewer, Inc. and T&M Port-O-Let Services, Inc. Describe method of liquid kitchen waste disposal: Immokalee Water & Sewer, Inc. Describe containers and m~thod of solid waste disposal (garbage): plus fifteen (15) 30-gallon trash cans 3 large dumpsters from Immokalee Disposal Number of solid waste disposal containers provided: 3 dumpsters Describe facilities and method of hand washing: Sinks at Guadalupe Soup Kitchen and cooler with water spouts, soap and paper towels Describe facilities and method of utensil washing, rinsing and sanitizing: Sink at Guadalupe Soup Kitchen Source of potable water: Immokalee Water & Sewer, Inc. and assorted gallon containers with water spouts. 16All As the sponsor of this event you are responsible to notify all food vendors of the temporary food service requirements. Failure to comply may subject the booths to be closed for public health reasons. Do you understand this completely? Yes X No I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief all of the statements contained herein and on any attachments are true, correct, complete, and made in good faith. I understand that these regulations include food intended for service to the public regardless of whether there is a charge for the food. I agree to assume responsibility for this event and certify that said b, usiness will be conducted in compliance with the Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 64E- 11. Date: This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 SATISFACTION OF LIEN 16A12 This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of One Thousand and Eighty Six Dollars ($1086.00), arising out of the Code Enforcement Board Amended Order Imposing Fines/Costs/Lien dated July 25 2002, recorded in O.R. Book 3099, Pages 3480, et. seq., and O.R. Book 3100, Pages 0051, et. seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by Lloyd L. Bowein has been satisfied in full. Lots 48 and 49, Replat of part of Blocks 4 and 5, of Naples Park Subdivision Unit No. 1, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 6, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida Folio No. 62521520007 & 62521560009 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Lloyd L. Bowein and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this /~ day of ~)~ ,2002. ATTEST: " ~DWIGHT:,E. ,,BROCK, Clerk ,, ~~ By: , Deputy Clerk attest as to C~a~r~an's s fgnat, ure Approved as to form s ' ' · Ellen T. Chadwell Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA *** 3082455 OR: 3158 PG: 0806 *** 11/21/2002 at 07:57AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 I~T~ROFFIC~ 47H FLOOR This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 16 15 SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Five Hundred Seventy Six Dollars and Seventy Cents ($576.70), arising out of the Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Costs/Lien dated March 5 2002, recorded in O.R. Book 2995, Pages 0882, et. seq., and O.R. Book 2995, Pages 0922, et. seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by Leonardo Portal has been satisfied in full. Lot 7, Block 141, Golden Gate Unit 4, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5, at Pages 107 through 116, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida Folio No. 0000036127200003 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Leonardo Portal and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this /~' day of '~~/ , 2002. ATTEST: DWI.G, HTE. BROCK, Clerk pu~y"C1 , De erk Attest as to Chal~.8 Approved as to form Ellen T. Chadwell Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA Ja ~~' *** 3082454 OR: 3158 PG: 0805 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 11/21/2002 at 07:56AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBB 6.00 COPIBS 1,00 R~tn: CLBRK TO THE BOARD INTBROFHCH ~TH FLOOR BXT 7240 PROJECT: Sabal Lake Drainage PARCEL: Portion of Tract F FOLIO #: 71755000601 16B DRAINAGE EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, made and entered into this ay of ~,~ L: ,2002, by SABAL LAKE SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., ~ Florida not for profit corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR") whose mailing address is 2335 9th Street North, #504, Naples, FL 34103, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE") whose mailing address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112. (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns.) WITNESSETH: Grantor, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the Grantee, a perpetual, non-exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and to install and maintain drainage and utility facilities on the following described lands located in Collier County, Florida, to wit: See attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein by reference. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. THIS IS NOT HOMESTEAD PROPERTY TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee together with the right to enter upon said land, place, excavate, and remove materials for the purpose of constructing, operating, and maintaining drainage and utility facilities thereon. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. The easement granted herein shall constitute easements running with the land and shall burden the lands described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. Witne~ (Signature) Name (Print or Type) VV~tn ess [{~Sig-natu rc~ ~ Name (Print or Type) ' STATE OF ~/~ ~cJ ~ COUNTY OF ~ MARIAN THOMPSON ~me (Print or Type) 2335 9th Street North #504 Naples, Florida 34103 The.~ foregoing Drainage Easement was acknowledged before me this .~ day of '_~~/ , 2002, b,y, MARIAN THOMPSON as President of SABAL LAKE SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Said person is ~--S--o~/~to me or has produced as indentification,"ai~ates that she is authorized to sign on behalf of the Association. (Affix Notarial Seal) I~(~ta ry Public Serial/Commission#: My Commission Expires: 16B 3 EXMI~$1'I' "A;" SABAL LAKE, UNIT ONE DRAINAGE EASEMENT LEGAl. DESCRIPTION A portion of Tract "F", of the plat "Sabal Lake Unit One", as recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages i and 2, inclusive of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida and more parlicularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of Tract "F", of the plat "Sabal Lake unit One", as recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages I and 2, inclusive of the Public.Records of Collier County, Florida and run S88° 49'14"W a distance o!'302.02 feet; thence run N01°I0'46"W a distance of 20.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; Thence run N07°45'53"W a distance of 102.68 feet; thence run S88°49'14"W a distance of 30.20 feet; thence run S07°45'53"E a distance of 102.68 feet; thence run N88°49' 14"E a distance of 30.20 feet to the Point of Beginning; Said parcel containing 0.07 acres, more or less, subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations o f record. PreCd _By: ~ William C. MeAnly, P.S.M. Florida Registration No. 1543 Not valid unless signed Not valid unless sealed with the Original raised seal McAnly Engineering and Design, inc. 5435 Pa,'k Central Court Naples, Florida 34109 PROJECT: PARCEL: FOLIO: Sabal Lake Drainage Portion of Tract F 7175500O601 16B DONATION AGREEMENT THIS DONATION AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between SABAL LAKE SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), whose mailing address is 2335 9~h Street North, #504, Naples, Florida 34103 and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (hereinafter referred to as "County"), whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112. WlTNESSETH: WHEREAS, County has requested that Owner convey to the County a perpetual, non- exclusive easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under, upon and across the lands described in Exhibit "A" (said easement hereinafter referred to as the "Property"), which is attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement; WHEREAS, Owner has been maintaining and is willing to continue to maintain the subject drainage easement; and WHEREAS, Owner desires to grant an Easement for drainage purposes to the County over the Property; and WHEREAS, Owner recognizes the benefit to Owner and desires to grant an Easement on the Property to the County for the stated purposes, on the terms and conditions set forth herein, said terms including that no compensation shall be due and payable for the Easement requested by County; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby mutually acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. Owner shall grant a Drainage Easement to the County at no cost to the County, unless otherwise stated herein. 2. Owner acknowledges that during the annual membership meeting of the homeowners on February 26, 2002, the membership voted to approve the donation of the drainage easement to the County as required by the applicable Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of Sabal Lakes. 3. Prior to Closing, Owner shall obtain from the holders of any liens, exceptions and/or qualifications encumbering the Property, the execution of such instruments which will remove, release or subordinate such encumbrances from the Property upon their recording in the public records of Collier County, Florida. Owner shall provide such instruments, properly executed, to County on or before the date of Closing. 4. This Agreement shall be null and void, and of no further force or effect, unless Closing shall occur within sixty (60) days from the date County executes this Agreement; provided; however, that County shall have the unilateral right to extend the term of this Agreement pending receipt of such instruments, properly executed, which either remove, release or subordinate any and all such liens, encumbrances or qualifications affecting County's enjoyment of the Property. 5. Owner is aware and understands that this Agreement is subject to the acceptance and approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. 16B 6. Owner represents that the Property and all uses of the Property have been and presently are in compliance with all Federal, State and Local environmental laws; that no hazardous substances have been generated, stored, treated or transferred on the Property except as specifically disclosed to the County; that the Owner has no knowledge of any spill or environmental law violation on any property contiguous to or in the vicinity of the Property to be conveyed to the County, that the Owner has not received notice and otherwise has no knowledge of a) any spill on the Property, b) any existing or threatened environmental lien against the Property or c) any lawsuit, proceeding or investigation regarding the generation, storage, treatment, spill or transfer of hazardous substances on the Property. This provision shall survive Closing and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title. 7. Owner shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the County against and from, and to reimburse the County with respect to, any and all damages, claims, liabilities, laws, costs and expenses (including without limitation reasonable paralegal and attorney fees and expenses whether in court, out of court, in bankruptcy or administrative proceedings or on appeal), penalties or fines incurred by or asserted against the County by reason or arising out of the breach of Owner's representation under Section 6. This provision shall survive Closing and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title. 8. The County shall pay for all costs of recording the conveyance instrument, and recording costs for any curative instruments, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. County shall be responsible for paying any costs and/or fees associated with the securing and recording a Subordination, Consent & Joinder of Easement of the mortgage(s) recorded against the Property from the mortgagee(s). All other costs associated with this transaction including but not limited to transfer, documentary and intangible taxes shall be borne and paid by Owner. The cost of a title commitment shall be paid by County. 9. This Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof shall be effective as of the date this Agreement is executed by both parties and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors, successor trustees, and/or assignees, whenever the context so requires or admits. 10. Conveyance of the Property by Owner is contingent upon no other provisions, conditions, or premises other than those so stated above; and the written Agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire Agreement and understanding of the parties, and there are no other prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, undertakings, promises, warranties, or covenants not contained herein. 11. If the Owner holds the Property in the form of a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Owner shall make a written public disclosure, according to Chapter 286, Florida statutes, under oath, of the name and address of every person having a beneficial interest in the Property before the Property held in such capacity is conveyed to County, its successors and assigns. (If the corporation is registered with the Federal Securities Exchange Commission or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose stock is for sale to the general public, it is hereby exempt from the provisions of Chapter 286, Florida Statutes.) 12. This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 16g 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. DATE ACQUISITION APPROVED BY BCC: /.//?~/~"'~ AS TO COUNTY: ':ATTEST: ~:: ',DW1GHT E. BROCK, Clerk ~:'" :'" ' ': ' ~ ","Deputy Clerk Attest as to Chairman's Signature o~15. AS TO OWNER: WITNESSES: Witne.~ (Signature) (Print) tne~_,J.Signature)___r"' ,-,,__ (,.), , . Name: ,,_~u (Printl - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIEF~By: , Chairman SABAL LAKE SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation THOMPSON as President (Print or type) Approved as to form and Ellen T. Chadwell Assistant County Attorney SABAL LAKE, UNIT ONE DRAINAGE EASEMENT LEGAl.. DESCRIPTION A portion of Tract "F", of the plat "Sabal Lake Unit One", as recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages 1 and 2, inclusive of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida and more particularly described as tbllows: Comnmncc at the Southeast corner of Tract "F", of the plat "Sabal Lake Unit One", as recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages I and 2, inclusive of thc Public.Records of Collier County, Florida and run S88° 49'14"W a distance of 302.02 feet; thence run N01°I0'46"W a distance of 20.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; Thence run N07°45'53"W a distance of 102.68 feet; thence run S88°49'14"W a distance of 30.20 feet; thence run S07°45'53"E a distance of 102.68 feet; thence run N88°49' 14"E a distance of 30.20 feet to the Point of Beginning; Said parcel containing 0.07 acres, more or less, subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. ~Anly, p~.S.~M.0'O Florida Registration No. 1543 Not valid unless signed Not valid unless sealed with the Original raised seal McAnly Engineering and Design, Inc. 5435 Park Central Court Naples, Florida 34109 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 5 RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A "NO PARKING" ZONE ALONG INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD FROM RADIO ROAD (CR 856) TO MERCANTILE AVENUE. WHEREAS, on May 20, 1980, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Collier County Ordinance No. 80-47 regulating parking in the unincorporated areas of Collier County; and WHEREAS, Section Four, Paragraph 2 of said ordinance authorizes the Board of County Commissioners to adopt resolutions designating certain areas along County roads as being areas in which parking, standing or stopping are restricted or prohibited, and upon adoption of said resolutions by the Board of Commissioners, such roads shall be posted with signs specifying the restrictions or prohibitions of parking, standing, or stopping; and WHEREAS, a request has been submitted for the establishment of a "no parking" zone along Industrial Boulevard from Radio Road to Mercantile Avenue; and WHEREAS, through an investigation of the area by Collier County Transportation Operations Department, it has been determined to be in the interest of the County to establish a "No Parking" Zone along the County road right-of-way of Industrial Boulevard from Radio Road to Mercantile Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT the following County road right- of-way be designated as a "No Parking" Zone and said road be posted as necessary with signs specifying that parking is prohibited at any time: "NO PARKING" is to be along the east and west rights-of-way of Industrial Boulevard extending from Radio Road (CR 856) north to Mercantile Avenue. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second, and majority vote favoring same this / ~ day of ~,~x ,. ~,. DWIG~i~ B~CK, Clerk Deputy Clerk Attest Signature only. Approved as to fo~ and legal s~i~ncy: . ~eidi F. Ashton Assistant County A~tomey 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA J A~N. ~-O L,'E~ A~-Cha~rrian RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 4 7 6 16B 5 RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A "NO PARKING" ZONE ALONG THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CORPORATE SQUARE BOULEVARD. WHEREAS, on May 20, 1980, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Collier County Ordinance No. 80-47 regulating parking in the unincorporated areas of Collier County; and WHEREAS, Section Four, Paragraph 2 of said ordinance authorizes the Board of County Commissioners to adopt resolutions designating certain areas along County roads as being areas in which parking, standing or stopping are restricted or prohibited, and upon adoption of said resolutions by the Board of Commissioners, such roads shall be posted with signs specifying the restrictions or prohibitions of parking, standing, or stopping; and WHEREAS, a request has been submitted for the establishment of a "no parking" zone within the road right-of-way of Corporate Square Boulevard; and WHEREAS, through an investigation of the area by Collier County Transportation Operations Department staff, it has been determined to be in the interest of the County to establish a "No Parking" Zone along the County road right-of-way of Corporate Square Boulevard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT the following County road right- of-way be designated as a "No Parking" Zone and said road be posted as necessary with signs specifying that parking is prohibited at any time: "NO PARKING" is to be allowed along the road right-of-way of Corporate Square Boulevard. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second, and majority vote favoring the same this /9~G dayof ~:'.D~GH~,E~R~K, Clerk 7C'5 5.. ' ' ' Deputy Clerk ~ttest as to Chal~'l aignature ,2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER C~ BY: JA/r-'/''''~ML~N. ":' -" -~- ' COLETTA, Chairman Approved as to form and leg,al s~ufficiency: / Hgi~li'F. As~ton v Assistant County Attorney 16g 6 MEMORANDUM Date: November 20, 2002 To: Michael A. Etelamaki, P.E., Director Transportation Road Maintenance Department From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Interagency Agreement Between Collier County and the State of Florida Department of Corrections, Hendry Correctional Institution, for Inmate Labor in Road Maintenance Activities Enclosed please find one original document, as referenced above (Agenda Item #16B6), approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 19, 2002. Kindly forward this agreement to the appropriate parties for the required signatures and return the fully executed original to Minutes and Records. If you have any questions, please call me at: 774-8406. Thank you. Enclosure FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS' INTERAGENCY/PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT (LOCAL AGREEMENT) RECE ROAD MAINTENANCE DEPT, This Agreement made and entered into th/s/tz~day of~[ 20a :~..,, by and between the State of Florida, Department of Corre~ions, t~ou~-its : ' : ' " mstltut, on/thc:hty~ CharCI,q-IenCI W/C (hereinafter referred to as Department), and the C.C. Road & -B~ (hereinafter referred to as Agency"), is done so in accordance Mth Section 946.40 Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative Code Rule Chapters 33-601.201, Inmate Work Programs and 33- 601.202, Use of Inmates in Public Works. The duration ofth/s agreement is from 07/01,~,00.~ to 06/.>0/200,~ · mo/dd/~ mo/dd~¥T Work pedbrmed under t~s Local A~eement is dete~ined to be value added or cost savings as defin~ in the CommuniD: Work Squad M~ual (.check one). ~ Value Added ~ Cost Savings I. DEPARTMENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES The Department a~ees to pro'dale, or is responsible for, those items delineated by ' - p~acement of an not respons~hM qt~all be marked "N/A" ro the left of thc nnmhcr X I. Screen inmates for the work to be performed to assign inmates who do not present a danger to property or persons. ~provide up to 8 inmates each workday for the per/od of the agreement. Community custody ( ); ~finimum custody ( ); _Both_( X ). Provide I vehicles and 1 Correctional Officers each workday to transport inmates to and from the work site. Provide Correctional O~cer supervision of the work squad while - _ .~.-_ performing work unue] tm~ A~-eement. _~_X_ 6. _X 7. Provide food and drinks for inmate lunches. Apprehend escapees and handle problem inmates. Provide transportation ~om the work site to the correctional t. oim y for inrnates whom refuse to work, become unable to work, or cause a disruption in the work schedule. Inmate Labor Agr~ment X 9. Page 2 o£ 4 Administer all disciplinary action to be taken against inmate(s) for infractions committed while under the supervision of the Agenc>,. Provide for medical treatment of ill or injured inmates and transportation of such inmates. NA I0. 11. 12. Conduct a background check, which includes a criminal history check, and obtain approval by the institution/faeiliry Warden or designee prior to authorizing Non- Department Supervisors to participate in training to supervise inmates. Provide orientation and training to Non-Department Supervisor(s) approved to supervise inmates prior to their assuming supervisoW responsibility of an inmate work squad. Training MIl be in accordance with the Departmem's guidelines for Non-Department Supervision of Inmates and wilI include annual regesher training duhng each successive yea,- .~ ~upervis~on by the Non-L~eparlmen: Supervisor. Notify the Agency in the event that an Agency employee fhils supervSsion of inmate(s). 13. Provide inmates with ail personal items of'clothing appropriate for the season of the 5'ear. Have inmates ready for h-ansportation/work at the appropriate ,mc~ ,~gardt~ ot temperature or inclement w'eahhe,; unless notified by the Agency of mspended work -r ......... , ............ ~ ~a,m~m ucm~mmvS ~nar a work squad should not cu~c~ NA_ 15. Other (attach additional page(s) if necessary). II. Aur, Nt~ ~ S RESPONSIBELIT~_~S The Agency agrees to provide, or is "-' , responsluie ~'- - ' u~nneated by piacement of an ~ in the space ~ · a ' ~ ,ocme~ to ~e ~en of the ~esponding number. Items ~Br ~' ' w,~cn the Agency is not responsible shall be marked "~'*" ~., ~,/~ to the left o~ me number. .Provide the Department Mrh a schedule of hours that inmates wi11 be worked in accordance with the established workday for the Agency and the transportation time required. Any deviation from the established schedule will be reported to, and coordinated with, the Department. NA_ 2. Provide supervision of inmates in accordance w/th the Departmem's rules mud regulations while performing work under this Agreement. Non-Department Super,,Ssors may supervise Community and Minimum Custody inmates. Each Non- Department Supervisor must successfully pass a background check that includes cr/minal b/story check, and must be approved by the institmiordfacility Warden or designee and complete required orientation/training in *he supervision of inmates, prior to assuming supervision. lmnat¢ Labor Agreement Page 3 of 4 NA 3. Provide transportation of inmates each workday to and from the work ske. Provide ail tools, equipment, materials and personal items such as gloves, rubber boots, hard hats, etc., necessary and appropriate for performance of the work under this Agreement. Ensure that licensing or permits are obtained if required for the work to be performed under this Agreement. Pro,~4de necessary supervision and guidance for projects that require a permit and require technical assistance to complete the project. NA Immediately notify the Department in the event of an escape while the inmate is under super;is/on of the Agency. Report any inappropriate behavior displayed by inmates or any inmate who fails to perform tasks in an acceptable manner. Complete daily the Community Work Squad Activities Report, DC6-239 (to be provided by the Department) and submit the form on a weekly basis to the Department. - NA Report ail inmate injuries, regardless of how minor in nature, to the Department as soon as possible. Report any medically related complaints made by an inmate to the Department as soon as practical. In cases of emergency, render first aid, within the scope of the supervisor's medical training, to work squad inmates and provide emergency health care and related assistance to the Department. Provide inmates ~vith a fil~ccn-minute rem breat,r in the morning and afternoon. Lunch breaks shall normally begii~ at Noon and last at least thirty (30) minutes. Ensure inmates are supervised during rest and lunch breaks. NA 10. Require each Non-Department Supervisor, approved to superx, ise inmates and other appropriate staff members, to at~end orientation/training in the super~Ssion of inmates prior to assuming supervision of inmates and refresher training annually thereafter. X tl. Ensure that all work assignmentr~/projects utilizing inmates are authorized projects of the municipality, dty, county, governmental agency or non-profit organization and that private contractors employed by the Agency do not use inmates as any part of their labor force. ~A_ 12. Agency hereby agrees to be liable for, and shall indemnify, defend and hold the Department harmless from all claims, suits, judgments or damages including court costs and attorney's fees arising out of intentional acts, negligence or omissions by the Agency in its supervision of inmates pursuant to this Agreement. If agency is an agency or subdivision of the State of Florida, this paragraph shall not be interpreted as altering the state's waiver ofimmuniB~ in tort pursuant to Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, or to otherwise impose liability on Agency for which it would not otherwise by law be re~onsible. 6 X 13. Other special considerations regarding activities of the work squad that may be based on work location, etc. (attach additional page(s) if necessary). III. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT The Department or the Agency may suspend or terminate this agreement with immediate written notice, in whole or in part, to the other party when the interests of the Department or Agency so require. Agreed to and signed this/~'/~e~lay of b ~ 20o~. FOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS: · Signature Print/~ Si ntt,, e ' ;" Print Title: Majoff · FOR COUNTY: · K, Clerk '~' ' '~L Vx) · "~ :1 Clerk s lgnature onlff. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~q. uefi/ne Hubbard Robinson P~sistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 4 ? ? A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AUTHORIZING COUNTY OFFICIALS TO CERTIFY DISBURSEMENTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION lbB 7 BOARD OF COUNTY TRANSPORTATION TO THE FLORIDA WHEREAS, agreements exist between the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) and the State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and said agreements require ongoing approval of monthly progress payments to parties identified in the agreements; and WHEREAS, FDOT has advised County staff that adoption of a resolution giving the Board consent and specifically authorizing County staff to sign documents authorizing progress payments is acceptable to the FDOT; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Board that the positions, the titles of which appear in the chart below, are hereby delegated the authority to approve and execute on behalf of and in the name of the Board, certifications of disbursements; and WHEREAS, this Board authorization shall remain in full force and effect, and the FDOT shall be entitled to rely upon this authorization until written notice of modification, rescission, or revocation has been provided to the State Utility Engineer of the FDOT. No such modification, rescission, or revocation shall, in any event, be effective with respect to any certifications of disbursements provided by the County to FDOT prior to notice of such modification, rescission, or revocation to the FDOT as specified above. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: The positions, the titles of which appear in the chart below, and the persons, the names of who appear in the chart below, are hereby authorized to approve and execute on behalf of and in the name of the Board, the specified documents listed in the chart below. Name of Representative I Title of Representative ] Approved to Sign ( Please I check or specify type below) Norman Fcder Transportation Administrator Certification of Disbursements Michael Etelamaki Director, Road Maintenance Certification of Disbursements This Resolution is not hereby intended to confer discretionary authority on anyone other than the Board of County Commissioners. - 1 - This Resolution adopted this/~(4ay of second and majority vote favoring same. lbB 7 ~'~~002 after motion, Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:___ JAMES N. COLETTA, Chairman Chief Assistant County Attorney - 2 - RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 4 7 8 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SPEED LIMIT REDUCTION FROM FORTY-FIVE MILES PER HOUR (45 MPH) TO FORTY MILES PER HOUR (40 MPH) ON PINE RIDGE ROAD (CR 896) IN THE VICINITY OF NAPLES BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, A TOTAL DISTANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 1,322 FEET. WHEREAS, Chapter 316, Florida Statutes, permits the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to alter established speed limits on roads under its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) falls under the jurisdiction of the BCC; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 316, Florida Statutes, the BCC may alter such existing speed limits as may be appropriate upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation; and WHEREAS, the results of such engineering and traffic investigations determined that reducing the speed limit from 45 to 40 mph from approximately 905 feet west of the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Naples Boulevard to approximately 417 feet east of that intersection is reasonable and safer than present conditions and it conforms to criteria promulgated by the County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: SECTION 1: The BCC does hereby establish a forty-mile per hour (40 MPH) speed limit on Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) from approximately 905 feet west of the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Naples Boulevard to approximately 417 feet east of that intersection for a total distance of approximately 1,322 feet, and does hereby direct the Collier County Transportation Operations Department to erect appropriate speed limit signs giving notice thereof. SECTION 2: A copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the Collier County Sheriff's Office for proper enforcement of the established speed limit for Pine Ridge Road (CR 896) within the designated segment. SECTION 3: The effective date of the speed limit reduction shall be after written notification to the Sheriff' s Office and upon posting of appropriate signage. This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and majority vote favoring same this /~'-~ day .ATTEg~: :'; .'DWlGH~ E.,~ROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chats'8 signature Approved as to form and le~lfufficiency: ~ Heidi F. Ashton Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: _- _ _ _x~'' JAI~S N. COLETTA, Chairman STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LEASE AGRI~EMENT ITEM/SEGMENT NO.: 1993591 MANAGING DISTRICT: ONE F.A.P. NO.: N/A STATE ROAD NO.: 951 COUNTY.: Collier PARCEL NO.: 500-Collier Co. Boat Ramp THIS AGREEMENT, madethis ?~,, day of ~~, ~_..~ , by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, (l~erainaffer called the Lessor), and Collier County Government, a political subdivision of the State of Florida whose address is 3300 Santa Barara Blvd. Naples, FL. (hereinafter called the Lessee.) WITNE$SETH: In consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable considerations, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Property and Term. Lessor does hereby lease unto Lessee the lands described in Exhibit ."A", for a term of Twenty-Five(25) years beginning 08/15/2002 and ending 08/14/2027 . This Agreement may be renewed for an additional 25 years term at Lessee's option, subject to the rent adjustment as provided in Paragraph 3 below. Lessee shall provide Lessor sixty (60) days advanced written notice of its exercise of the renewal option. If Lessee holds over and remains in possession of the land after the expiration of the term specified in this Lease, or any renewals of such term, Lessee's tenancy shall be considered a tenancy at sufferance, subject to the same terms and conditions as herein contained in this Lease. This Lease is subject to all utilities in place and to the maintenance thereof as well as any other covenants, easements, or restrictions of record. This lease shall be construed as a lease of only the interest, if any, of Lessor, and no warranty of title shall be deemed to be given herewith. 2. Use. The leased land shall be used solely for the purpose of boat ramp parking and related activities If the land is used for any other purpose, the Lessor shall have the option of immediately terminating this Agreement. Lessee shall not permit any use of the land in any manner that would obstruct or interfere with any transportation facilities. The Lessee will further use and occupy said premises in a careful and proper manne~:,~ and not commit any waste thereon. Lessees will not cause, or allow to be caused, any nuisance or objectionable activity of any nature on the premises. Any activities in any way involving hazardous materials or substances of any kind whatsoever, either as those terms may be defined under any state or federal laws or regulations or as those terms are understood in common usage, are specifically prohibited. The Lessee will not use or occupy said premises for any unlawful purpose and will, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, conform to and obey any present or future ordinances and/or rules, regulations, requirements and orders of governmental authorities or agencies respecting the use and occupation of said premises. 3. Rent. Lessee shall pay to Lessor as rent, on or before the first day of each rent payment period, the sum of N/A plus tax, for each N/A of the term. If this Agreement is terminated prior to the end of any rent payment period, the unearned portion of any rent payment, less any other amounts that may be owed to Lessor, shall be refunded to Lessee. Lessee shall pay any and all state, county, city and local taxes that may be due during the term hereof, including any real property taxes. Rent payments shall be made payable to the Department of Transportation and shall be sent to N/A N/A . The Lessor reserves the right to review and adjust the rental fee biannually and at renewal to reflect market conditions. Any installment of rent not received within ten (10) days after the date due 160 RIGHT OF WAY 05/01 Page 2 o~4 shall bear interest at the highest rate allowed by law from the due date thereof. This provision shall not obligate Lessor to accept late rent payments or provide Lessee a grace Period. 4. Improvements. No structures or improvements of any kind shall be placed upon the land without prior approval in writing by the District Secretary for District One of Lessor. Any such structures or improvements shall be constructed in a good and workmanlike manner at Lessee's sole cost and expense. Subject to any landlords lien, any structures or improvements constructed by Lessee shall be removed by the Lessee, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, by midnight on the day of termination of this Agreement and the land restored as nearly as practical to its condition at the time this agreement is executed. Portable or temporary advertising signs are prohibited. Lessee shall perform, at the sole expense of Lessee, all work required in the preparation of the property or premises hereby leased for occupancy by Lessee, in the absence 'of any special provision herein contained to the contrary;, and Lessee does hereby accept the leased property or premises as now being in ffi and tenantable condition for all purposes of Lessee. Lessor reserves the right to inspect the leased area and to require whatever adjustment to structures or improvements as Lessor, in its sole discretion, deems necessary. Any adjustments shall be done at Lessee's sole costs and expense. 5. Maintenance. Lessee shall keep and maintain the land and any building or other structure, now or hereafter erected thereon, in good and safe condition and repair at Lessee's own expense during the existence of this lease, and shall keep the same free and clear of any and all grass, weeds, brush and debris of any kind, so as to prevent the same becoming dangerous, inflammable or objectionable. Lessor shall have no duty to inspect or maintain any of the land, buildings or other structures, if any, during the term of this Lease; however, Lessor shall have the right, upon twenty-four (24) hours notice to Lessee, to enter the property for purposes of inspection, including conducting an environmental assessment. Such assessment may include but would not be limited to: surveying, sampling of building materials, soil and groundwater, monitoring well installations; soil excavation; groundwater remediation; emergency asbestos abatement;, operation and maintenance inspections; and, any other actions which might be reasonable and necessary. Lessor's right of entry shall not obligate inspection of the property by Lessor, nor shall it relieve the Lessee of its duty to maintain the property. In the event of emergency due to a release or suspected release of hazardous waste on the premises, Lessor shall have the right of immediate inspection, and the right, but no the obligation, to engage in remedial action, without noticel 6. Indemnification. Lessee shall indemnify, defend, save and hold Lessor, its agents and employees, harmless of and from any losses, fines, penalties, costs, damage, claims, demands, suits and liabilities of any nature, including affomeys fees, (including regulatory and appellate fees), arising out of, because of, or due to any accidents, happening or occurrence on the leased land or arising in any manner on account of the exercise or attempted exercise of Lessee's rights hereunder whether the same regards person or property of any nature whatsoever, regardless of the apportionment of negligence, unless due to the sole negligence of Lessor. ri Lessee's obligation to indemnify, defend, and pay for the defense or at the Department's option, to participate and associate with the Department in the defense and trial of any claim and any related settlement negotiations, shall be triggered by the Department's notice of claim for indemnification to Lessee. Lessee's inability to evaluate liability or its evaluation of liability shall not excuse Lessee's duty to defend and indemnify within seven days after such notice by the Department is given by registered mail. Only an adjudication or judgement after the highest appeal is exhausted specifically find the Department solely negligent shall excuse performance of this provision by Lessee. Lessee shall pay all costs and fees related to this obligation and its enforcement by the Department. Depadment's failure to notify Lessee of a claim shall not release Lessee of the above duty to defend. 7. Insurance. Lessee at its expense, shall maintain at all time during the term of this Lease, public liability insurance protecting Lessor and Lessee against any and all claims for injury and damage to persons or property or for the loss of life or property occurring in, on or about the land arising out of the act, negligence, omission, nonfeasance or malfeasance of Lessee, its employees, agents, contractors, customers, licensees, and invitees. Such insurance shall be carried in a minimum amount of not less than one hundred thousand ($ 100,000.00 ) for bodily injury or death to any one person or any number of persons in any one occurrence and not less than two hundred thousand ($ ~ ) for property damage. All such policies shall be issued by companies of recognized responsibility licensed to do business in the State of Florida and all such policies shall contain a provision whereby the same cannot be canceled or modified unless Lessor is given at lease sixty (60) days prior written notice of such cancellation or modification. Lessee shall provide Lessor certificates showing such insurance to be in place and showing Lessor as additional name insured under the policies. 160 Page3 of 4 Lessor may require the amount of any public liability insurance to be maintained by Lessee be increased so that the amount thereof adequately protects Lessor's interest. Lessee further agrees that it shall during the full term of this Lease and at its own expense keep the land and any improvements on the land fully insured against loss or damage by fire and other casualty. Lessee also agrees that it shall during the full term of this Lease and ~at its own expense keep its contents and personal property located on the land fully insured against loss or damage by fire or other casualty and does hereby release and waive on behalf of itself and its insurer, by subrogation or otherwise, all claims against Lessor arising out of any fire or other casualty whether or not such fire or other casualty shall have resulted in whole or in part from the negligence of the Lessor. 8. Eminent Domain. Lessee acknowledges and agrees that its relationship with Lessor under this Lease is one of Landlord and Tenant and no other relationship either expressed or implied shall be deemed to apply to the parties under this Lease. Termination of this Lease for any cause shall not be deemed a taking under any eminent domain or other law so as to entitle Lessee to compensation for any interest suffered or lost as a result of termination of this Lease, including but not limited to (I) any residual interest in the Lease, or (ii) any other facts or cimumstances arising out of or in connection with this Lease. Lessee hereby waives and relinquishes any legal rights and monetary claims which it might have for full compensation, or damages of any sort, including but not limited to special damages, severance damages, removal costs or loss of business profits resulting from its loss of occupancy of the leased property specified in the Agreement, or adjacent properties owned or leased by it, when any or all such properties are taken by eminent domain proceedings or sold under the threat thereof. This waiver and relinquishment applies whether (I) this Lease is still in existence on the date of taking or sale; or (ii) has been terminated prior thereto. 9. Miscellaneous. ~, a. This Agreement may be terminated by Lessor immediately, without prior notice, upon default by Lessee hereunder, and may be terminated by either party upon sixty ( 60 ) days prior written notice to the other party. b. In the case of litigation arising out of the enforcement of any terms, covenants or provisions of this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover:its reasonable attomeys' fees from the non-prevailing party. c. Lessee acknowledges that it has reviewed this Lease, is familiar with its terms and has had adequate opportunity to review this Lease with legal counsel of L~essee's choosing. Lessee has entered into this Lease freely and voluntarily. This Lease contains the complete understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. All prior understandings and agreements, oral or written, heretofore made between the parties and/or between Lessee and the previous owner of the leased property and landlord of Lessee are me.rged in this Lease, which alone, fully and completely expresses the agreement between Lessee and Lessor with respect to the subject matter hereof. No modification, waiver or amendment of this Lease or any of its conditions or provisions shall be binding upon Lessor or Lessee unless in writing and signed by both such parties. d. Lessee shall not sublet the lease I~rcperty or any part thereof, nor assign this Lease, without the prior consent in writing of the Lessor, this Lease being executed by Lessor upon the credit and reputation of Lessee. Acceptance by Lessor of rental from a third party shall not be considered as an assign :ment or sublease. e. Lessee shall be solely responsible for all bills for electricity, lighting, power, gas, water, telephone and telegraph services, or any other utility or service used on the land. f. This Agreement shall be governed~;bY the laws of the State of Florida, and any applicable laws of the United States of America. g. All notices'to Lessor shall be sent ~to the address for rent payments and all notices to Lessee shall be sent to: Florida Department of Transportation, Property Management Section at P.O. Box 1249, Bartow, FI 33831 160 2 575-080-33 RIGHT OF WAY 05~01 Page4~4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed, the day and Year first above written. LESSOR Print Name By: Attest: STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION D~cretary Ricky A. Langley Print Name ~'- / ~- o 3.. (~e~ut~'Secretary ~- (SEAL) By: Print Name Description: A portion of the Right of Way of, State Rood 951 (Collier Boulevard) according to the Right of Way Map thereof (section 05030-2511) and being o portion of Section 35, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described os follows: Commence at the intersection of the North tract boundary of Development Tract-A, of the Collier-Read Tract Map, according to the plat thereof, os recorded in Pict Book 8, Pages 46 and 47 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, said parcel being located in the Collier-Read Tract Map and the existing Westerly Right of Way Line of State Road 951, (Collier Boulevard) said intersection being shown on aforesaid plot as Point Number 5; thence South 02"27'28" West, along said Westerly Right of Way Line, for a distance of 268.09 feet; thence North 87"32'32" West, for o distance of 40.00 feet a point on a circular curve, concave Westerly, whose radius point bears North 87"`32'32" West, a distance of 5:3,887.79 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, clang the crc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 5,887.79 feet, through a central angle of 10"47'43", subtended by o chord of 751.42 feet at a bearing of South 07"51'20" West, for an arc length of 752.51 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 76'44'49" East, for a distance of 15.3.11 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel; thence South 75"53'18" East, for a distance of 46.89 feet, to a point of intersection with the easterly Right of Way line of State Road 951 (Collier Boulevard) and a point on a circular curve, concave Westerly, whose radius point bears North 76'¢4'14" West, a distance of 4,087.79 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, along said easterly Right of Way line cna the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 4,087.79 feet, through a central angle of 07'17'34", subtended by a chord of 519.95 feet at a bearing of South 16"54'.33" Wes[, for an crc length of 520..30 feet to the end Of said curve; thence South 20'3.3'20" West, along said easterly Right of Way line, for a distance of 1,2.38.28 feet; thence North 69'09'27" West, for a distance of 6.3.58 feet; thence North 18"00'0.3" East, for o distance of 156.05 feet; thence North 19"30'28" East, for a distance of 500.16 feet; thence North 20".32'5.3" East, for o distance of 576.58 feet; thence North 20"58'09" East, for a distance of 591.15 feet; thence North 26"01'.37" East, for a distance of 37.61 feet; thence North 15'23'57" East, for a distance of 91.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 124,890.08 square feet or 2.87 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is state plane coordinates, Florida East Zone. 5. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION ~,lll~ WILKISON &: ~ASSOClATES II ~~NC.I ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA, 34.104- (94-1) 64,3-2404 FAX NO, (941) 64-3-5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS UCENSE qO. LB5770 SCALE SEC/SUB W.O. NO. DRAWN BY AS NOTED 33/51/26I I 0145.1 EAW J DAT~ I SHEET FB pG CHECKED BY · DWG. NO. 06/02 J 2 OF 2 DJH FILE NAME PO145SD.DWG 51-L-30-2 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT: / I TRACT "A" AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE, ~,! ROAD 951 I ,:.~¢; / _ / 0 1 O0 200 SCALE: 1"=~_.00 / P OF BEGINNING: 30( UNE TABLE UNE LENGTH BEARING L1 268.09 S02'27'28"W L2 40.00 N87'32'32"W L3 153.11 S76'44'49"E L4 46.89 S75'53'1 L5 63.38 N69'og'27'W L6 156.0,3 N15'OO'O3"E L7 300.16 Nlg'30'28"E L8 ,37.61 N26'O1'37"E L9 91.00 N15'23'57"E CURVE TABLE CURVE RAD US DELTA ARC LENGTH CHORD BEAR NG CHORD Cl 3887.79 10'47'43' 732 51 S07'51'20'W 7.31.42 C2 4087.791 717'34" I 520.30 S16'54.33"W I 51g.95 '"J SCALE SEC/SUB AS NOTED 35/51/26 DATE SHEET . o~/o= i~ o~ = ~ . ~ -/7-(~-'-'~ (DATE SIGNED) NOT VALID' WlTHOUT THE SlCNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION ~~1~, WILKISON &: ~ASsOCIATES ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 350§ EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34-104 (g4,1) 643-2404- FAX NO. (94-1) 64-.3-5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. L55770 W.O. NO. DRAWN BY I FILE NAME I 0145.1 LAW I PO145SD.DWG I FB PG CHECKED BYI DWG. NO. DJH I 51-L-30-1 16g 2 5 MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Re: November 21, 2002 Amanda Oswald, Operations Coordinator Parks and Recreation Department Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program Grant Agreement for Improvements at Bayview Park Enclosed please find two original agreements as referenced above, (Agenda Item #16D3), approved by the Board of County Commissioners on November 19, 2002. Kindly forward these documents to the Department of Environmental Protection for the required signature and return one fully executed original to Minutes and Records. If you should have any questions, please contact me at extension 8406. Thank you. Enclosures 16D F3604 DEP Contract Number CSFA Number: 37017 CSFA Title: FRDAP FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FLORIDA RECREATION DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (FRDAP) Project Grant Agreement (FY 2002-03) - Development This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 200 , by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, hereinafter called the DEPARTMENT, and COLLIER COUNTY, hereinafter called the GRANTEE, a local government, in furtherance of an approved public outdoor recreation project. In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and pursuant to section 375.075, Florida Statutes, and chapter 62D-5, Part V, Florida Administrative Code, the parties hereto agree as follows: This Project Agreement shall be performed in accordance with section 375.075, Florida Statutes, and chapter 62D-5, Part V, Florida Administrative Code, hereinafter called the RULE. The GRANTEE shall comply with all provisions of the RULE effective August 23,2000, which is incorporated into this Project Agreement as if fully set forth herein. It is the intent of the DEPARTMENT and the GRANTEE that none of the provisions of section 163.01, Florida Statutes, shall have application to this Project Agreement. o The DEPARTMENT has found that public outdoor recreation is the primary purpose of the project known as Balrview Park (Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program, FRDAP Project Number F03604), hereinafter called the PROJECT, and ~nters into this Project Agreement with the GRANTEE for the development of that Page 1 of 11 real property, the legal description of which shall be submitted to the DEPARTMENT as described in the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program Development Project Pre- reimbursement/Commencement Documentation Form, DEP Form FPS-A034. o The GRANTEE shall construct, or cause to be constructed, certain public outdoor recreation facilities and improvements consisting of the following PROJECT ELEMENTS which may be modified by the DEPARTMENT if GRANTEE shows good cause: Dock, picnic facilities, renovation of dock, boatramp, restroom/pavilion; security lights, landscaping and other related support facilities. The DEPARTMENT shall pay, on a reimbursement basis, to the GRANTEE, funds not to exceed $120,000.00, which will pay the DEPARTMENT'S share of the cost of the PROJECT. DEPARTMENT fund limits are based upon the following: DEPARTMENT Amount $120,000.00 50% GRANTEE Match $120,000.00 50% Type of Match Cash, In-Kind Services, Land Value o The PROJECT reimbursement request shall include all documentation required by the DEPARTMENT for a proper pre-audit and post-audit review. Within sixty (60) days after receipt of the request, the DEPARTMENT'S Contract Manager shall review the completion documentation and payment request from the GRANTEE for the PROJECT. If the documentation is sufficient and meets the requirements of the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program Completion Documentation Form, DEP Form FPS-A037, referenced in s. 62D-5.058(6)2(g), the DEPARTMENT will approve the request for payment. o The DEPARTMENT will periodically request proof of a transaction (invoice, payroll register, etc.) to evaluate the appropriateness of costs to the agreement pursuant to State and Federal guidelines including cost allocation guidelines), as appropriate. This information when requested must be provided within 30 calendar days of such request. The Grantee may also be required to submit a cost allocation plan to the Department in support of its multipliers (overhead, indirect, general administrative costs, and fringe benefits). All bills for amounts due under this agreement shall be submitted in detail sufficient for a proper pre-audit and post-audit thereof. State guidelines for Page 2 of 11 allowable costs can be found in the State Comptroller's Voucher Processing Handbook at (<http://www.dbf.state.fl.us/aadir/mainindex.html). o The GRANTEE agrees to comply with the Division of Recreation and Parks' Grant and Contract Accountability Procedure, hereinafter called the PROCEDURE and incorporated into this Project Agreement by reference as if fully set forth herein. All purchases of goods and services for accomplishment of the PROJECT shall be secured in accordance with the GRANTEE'S adopted procurement procedures. Expenses representing the PROJECT costs, including the required matching contribution, shall be reported to the DEPARTMENT and summarized on certification forms provided in the PROCEDURE. The DEPARTMENT and GRANTEE agree to use the PROCEDURE guidelines accounting for FRDAP funds disbursed under the PROJECT. The parties further agree that the principles for determining the eligible costs, supporting documentation and minimum reporting requirements of the PROCEDURE shall be used. o Allowable indirect costs as defined in the PROCEDURE shall not exceed 15% of the GRANTEE'S eligible wages and salaries. Indirect costs that exceed 15% must be approved in advance in writing by the DEPARTMENT to be considered eligible PROJECT expenses. o It is understood by the parties that the amount of this Project Agreement may be reduced should the Governor's Budget Office declare a revenue shortfall and assess a mandatory reserve. Should a shortfall be declared, the amount of this Project Agreement may be reduced by the same percentage as the DEPARTMENT is assessed for the mandatory reserve. 10. PROJECT funds may be reimbursed for eligible Preagreement Expenses (as defined in s. 62D-5.054(34) of the RULE) incurred by GRANTEE prior to execution of this Project Agreement as set forth in s.62D-5.055(9) of the RULE. The DEPARTMENT and the GRANTEE fully understand and agree that there shall be no reimbursement of PROJECT funds by the DEPARTMENT for any expenditure made prior to the execution of this Project Agreement with the exception of those expenditures which meet the requirements of the foregoing sections of the RULE. Page 3 of 11 16D 3 11. Prior to commencement of PROJECT development, the GRANTEE shall submit the documentation required by the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program Development Project Pre- reimbursement/Commencement Documentation Form, DEP Form FPS-A034, referenced in s. 62D-5.058(6) (f) of the RULE, to the DEPARTMENT. Upon determining that the documentation complies with the RULE, the DEPARTMENT will give written notice to GRANTEE to commence the development and approve the request for payment. 12. The Grantee shall obtain all required local, state and federal permits and approvals prior to commencement of project construction and shall certify that it has done so to the DEPARTMENT by completing the Permitting Certification, FPS-A034, referenced in s. 62D-5.058(7) (c) of the RULE. 13. This Project Agreement shall become effective upon execution and the GRANTEE shall complete construction of all PROJECT ELEMENTS on or before (hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT completion date). The GRANTEE may request up to two (2) one (1) year extensions from the DEPARTMENT for good cause at the written request of the GRANTEE and such request must be made prior to the PROJECT completion date. PROJECT must be completed within 5 years, or money may revert. 14. Project completion means the project is open and available for use by the public. Project must be completed prior to release of final reimbursement. 15. The GRANTEE shall retain all records supporting PROJECT costs for five (5) years after the fiscal year in which the final PROJECT payment was released by the DEPARTMENT or until final resolution of matters resulting from any litigation, claim or audit that started prior to the expiration of the five-year retention period. The DEPARTMENT, State Auditor General, State Comptroller and other agencies or entities with jurisdiction shall have the right to inspect and audit the GRANTEE'S records for said PROJECT within the five-year retention period. 16. In addition to the provisions contained in Paragraph 15 above, the GRANTEE shall comply with the applicable provisions contained in Attachment 1. A revised copy of Attachment 1, Exhibit-l, must be provided to the GRANTEE with each amendment which authorizes a funding increase or decrease. The revised Exhibit-1 shall Page 4 of 11 160 3 summarize the funding sources supporting the Project Agreement for purposes of assisting the GRANTEE in complying with the requirements of Attachment 1. If the GPJ~NTEE fails to receive a revised copy of Attachment 1, Exhibit-l, the GRANTEE shall notify the Department's FRDAP Grants Administrator at 850/488-7896 to request a copy of the updated information. 17. Following receipt of an audit report identifying any reimbursement due the DEPARTMENT for the GRANTEE'S non- compliance with this Project Agreement, the GRANTEE will be allowed a maximum of thirty (30) days to submit additional pertinent documentation to offset the amount identified as being due to the DEPARTMENT. The DEPARTMENT, following a review of the documentation submitted by the GRANTEE, will inform the GRANTEE of any reimbursement due the DEPARTMENT. 18. The Grantee, as an independent contractor and not an agent, representative, or employee of the DEPARTMENT, agrees to carry adequate liability and other appropriate forms of insurance. The DEPARTMENT shall have no liability except as specifically provided in this Project Agreement. 19. To the extent required by law, the Grantee will be self-insured against, or will secure and maintain during the life of this Agreement, Workers' Compensation Insurance for all employees connected with the work of this project and, in case any work is subcontracted, the Grantee shall require the subcontractor similarly to provide Workers' Compensation Insurance for all of the latter's employees unless such employees are covered by the protection afforded by the Grantee. Such self-insurance program or insurance coverage shall comply fully with the Florida Workers' Compensation law. In case any class of employees engaged in hazardous work under this Agreement is not protected under Workers' Compensation statutes, the Grantee shall provide, and cause each subcontractor to provide, adequate insurance satisfactory to the Department, for the protection of his employees not otherwise protected. 20. The purchase of non-expendable equipment is not authorized under the terms of this Agreement. Page 5 of 11 21. The DEPARTMENT'S Grant Manager for the purpose of this Project Agreement shall be responsible for ensuring performance of its terms and conditions and shall approve all reimbursement requests prior to payment. The GRANTEE's Grant Manager, as identified in the PROJECT application, or successor, shall act on behalf of the GRANTEE relative to the provisions of this Project Agreement. The GRANTEE, shall submit to the DEPARTMENT signed PROJECT status reports every ninety (90) days summarizing the work accomplished, problems encountered, percentage of completion, and other information which may be requested by the DEPARTMENT. Photographs to reflect the construction work accomplished shall be submitted when the DEPARTMENT requests them. Any and all notices shall be delivered to the parties at the following addresses: Grantee's Grant Manager Ms. Amanda Oswald Operations Coordinator 3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard Naples, Florida, 34116 Department's Grant Manager Mary Ann Lee Dept. of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS 585 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 22. Prior to final reimbursement, the GRANTEE must erect a permanent information sign on the PROJECT site which credits PROJECT funding or a portion thereof, from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program. 23. The DEPARTMENT has the right to inspect the PROJECT and any and all records related thereto at any reasonable time. 24. This Agreement may be unilaterally canceled by the DEPARTMENT for refusal by the GRANTEE to allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material made or received by the GRANTEE in conjunction with this Agreement, unless the records are exempt from Section 24(a) of Article I of the State Constitution and Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes. 25. Prior to the closing of the PROJECT the DEPARTMENT shall have the right to demand a refund, either in whole or in part, of the FRDAP funds provided to the GRANTEE for non-compliance with the material terms of this Project Agreement. The GRANTEE, upon such written notification from the DEPARTMENT, shall refund, and shall forthwith pay to the DEPARTMENT, the amount of money demanded by Page 6 of 11 the DEPARTMENT. Interest on any refund shall begin the date that the GRANTEE was informed that a refund was required until refund and interest is paid to the Department. 26. The GRANTEE shall comply with all federal, state and local rules, regulations and ordinances in acquiring and developing this PROJECT. The GRANTEE acknowledges that this requirement includes compliance with all federal, state and local health and safety rules and regulations including all applicable building codes. The GRANTEE further agrees to ensure that the GRANTEE'S contract' will include the requirements of this paragraph in all subcontracts made to perform this Project Agreement. 27. Land owned by the GRANTEE, which is developed or acquired with FRDAP funds, shall be dedicated in perpetuity as an outdoor recreation site by the GRANTEE for the use and benefit of the public as stated in Administrative Rule 62D-5.059(1). Land under control other than by ownership of the GRANTEE such as by lease, shall be dedicated as an outdoor recreation area for the use and benefit of the general public for a minimum period of twenty-five (25) years from the completion date set forth in the PROJECT completion certificate. All dedications must be recorded in the public property records by the GRANTEE. Such PROJECT shall be open at reasonable times and shall be managed in a safe and attractive manner appropriate for public use. 28. Failure to comply with the provisions of the RULE or the terms and conditions of this Project Agreement will result in cancellation of the Project Agreement by the DEPARTMENT. The DEPARTMENT shall give the GRANTEE in violation of the RULE or this Project Agreement a notice in writing of the particular violations stating a reasonable time to comply. Failure to comply within the time period stated in the written notice shall result in cancellation of the Project Agreement and may result in the imposition of the terms in Paragraph 25. 29. In the event of conflict in the provisions of the RULE, the Project Agreement and the Project Application, the provisions of the Rule shall control over this Project Agreement and this Project Agreement shall control over the Project Application documents. Page 7 of 11 30. 3 If the DEPARTMENT determines that site control is not sufficient under the RULE the DEPARTMENT shall give the applicant a notice in writing and a reasonable time to comply. If the deficiency cannot be reasonably corrected within the time specified in the notice, the DEPARTMENT shall cancel this Project Agreement. 31. The State of Florida's performance and obligation to pay under this Project Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Florida Legislature. 32. This Project Agreement strictly prohibits the expenditure of FRDAP funds for the purpose of lobbying the legislative, judicial, or executive branch of local, state, or federal government. 33. A0 o No person on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, marital status or disability, shall be excluded from participation in; be denied the proceeds or benefits of; or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in performance of this Project Agreement. An entity or affiliate who has been placed on the discriminatory vendor list may not submit a bid on a contract to provide goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not award or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity. The Florida Department of Management Services is responsible for maintaining the discriminatory vendor list and intends to post the list on its website. Questions regarding the discriminatory vendor list may be directed to the Florida Department of Management Services, Office of Supplier Diversity at 850/487-0915. 34. Each party hereto agrees that it shall be solely responsible for the wrongful acts of its employees and agents. However, nothing contained herein shall constitute a waiver by either party of its sovereign immunity or the provisions of s. 768.28, Florida Statutes. Page 8 of 11 16D } 35. The employment of unauthorized aliens by any GRANTEE is considered a violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act 8 USCA s.1324a(1) (A). If the GRANTEE knowingly employs unauthorized aliens, such violation shall be cause for unilateral cancellation of this Project Agreement. The GRANTEE shall be responsible for including this provision in all subcontracts with private organizations made to perform this Project Agreement. 36. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crime may not perform work as a grantee, contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017, Florida Statutes, or Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. 37. The Project Agreement has been delivered in the State of Florida and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of Florida. Wherever possible, each provision of this Project Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable Florida law, but if any provision of this Project Agreement shall be prohibited or invalid under applicable Florida law, such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of such provision or the remaining provisions of this Project Agreement. Any action hereon or in connection herewith shall be brought in Leon County, Florida unless prohibited by applicable law. 38. No delay or failure to exercise any right, power or remedy accruing to either party upon breach or default by either party under this Project Agreement, shall impair any such right, power or remedy of either party; nor shall such delay or failure be construed as a waiver of any such breach or default, or any similar breach or default thereafter. 39. This Project Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed as granting any rights, privileges or interest in any third party without mutual written agreement of the parties hereto. Page 9 of 11 16D 5 40. This Project Agreement is an exclusive contract and may not be assigned in whole or in part without the written approval of the DEPARTMENT. 41. This Project Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties. Any alterations, variations, changes, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Project Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing, duly executed by each of the parties hereto, and attached to the original of this Project Agreement. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 10 of 11 16D 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION By: By: Division Director (or Designee) Division of Recreation and Parks COLLIER COUNTY Persian Authorized to S.ign, //11 Printed Name Title Address: Bureau of Design and Recreation Services Division of Recreation and Parks 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Mail Station 585 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Approved as to Form and Legality: This form has been pre-approved as to form and legality by Jerome I. Johnson, Assistant General Counsel, on July 26, 2002 for use for one year. Addre s s: 3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard Naples, Florida Attest as DEP 42-058 Revised 04-05-2002 Page 11 of 11 SINGLE AUDIT ACT - SPECIAL AUDIT REQUIREMENTS 160 The administration of resources awarded by the Department of Environmental Protection (which may be referred to as the "Department", "DEP", "FDEP" or "Grantor", or other name in the contract/agreement) to the recipient (which may be referred to as the "Contractor", Grantee" or other name in the contract/agreement) may be subject to audits and/or monitoring by the Department of Environmental Protection, as described in this attachment. MONITORING In addition to reviews of audits conducted in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 and Section 215.97, F.S., as revised (see "AUDITS" below), monitoring procedures may include, but not be limited to, on-site visits by Department staff, limited scope audits as defined by OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and/or other procedures. By entering into this Agreement, the recipient agrees to comply and cooperate with any monitoring procedures/processes deemed appropriate by the Department of Environmental Protection. In the event the Department of Environmental Protection determines that a limited scope audit of the recipient is appropriate, the recipient agrees to comply with any additional instructions provided by the Department to the recipient regarding such audit. The recipient further agrees to comply and cooperate with any inspections, reviews, investigations, or audits deemed necessary by the Comptroller or Auditor General. AUDITS PART h FEDERALLY FUNDED This part is applicable if the recipient is a State or local government or a non-profit organization as defined in OMB Circular A-133, as revised. In the event that the recipient expends $300,000 or more in Federal awards in its fiscal year, the recipient must have a single or program-specific audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133, as revised. EXHIBIT 1 to this Agreement indicates Federal funds awarded through the Department of Environmental Protection by this Agreement. In determining the Federal awards expended in its fiscal year, the recipient shall consider all sources of Federal awards, including Federal resources received from the Department of Environmental Protection. The determination of amounts of Federal awards expended should be in accordance with the guidelines established by OMB Circular A-133, as revised. An audit of the recipient conducted by the Auditor General in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133, as revised, will meet the requirements of this part. In connection with the audit requirements addressed in Part I, paragraph 1., the recipient shall fulfill the requirements relative to auditee responsibilities as provided in Subpart C of OMB Circular A-133, as revised. If the recipient expends less than $300,000 in Federal awards in its fiscal year, an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133, as revised, is not required. In the event that the recipient expends less than $300,000 in Federal awards in its fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133, as revised, the cost of the audit must be paid from non-Federal resources (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from recipient resources obtained from other than Federal entities). The recipient may access information regarding the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) via the internet at http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/cfda. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DEP 55-203 (02-03) Page 1 of 4 PART II: STATE FUNDED 16D } This part is applicable if the recipient is a nonstate entity as defined by Section 215.97(2)(1), Florida Statutes. 1. In the event that the recipient expends a total amount of State financial assistance equal to or in excess of $300,000 in any fiscal year of such recipient, the recipient must have a State single or project-specific audit for such fiscal year in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes; applicable rules of the Executive Office of the Governor and the Compa'oller; and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General. EXHIBIT 1 to this Agreement indicates State financial assistance awarded through the Department of Environmental Protection by this Agreement. In determining the State financial assistance expended in its fiscal year, the recipient shall consider all sources of State financial assistance, including State financial assistance received from the Department of Environmental Protection, other state agencies, and other nonstate entities. State financial assistance does not include Federal direct or pass-through awards and resources received by a nonstate entity for Federal program matching requirements. In connection with the audit requirements addressed in Part II, paragraph 1, the recipient shall ensure that the audit complies with the requirements of Section 215.97(7), Florida Statutes. This includes submission of a financial reporting package as defined by Section 215.97(2)(d), Florida Statutes, and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General. If the recipient expends less than $300,000 in State financial assistance in its fiscal year, an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, is not required. In the event that the recipient expends less than $300,000 in State financial assistance in its fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the cost of the audit must be paid from the non-State entity's resources (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from the recipient's resources obtained from other than State entities). For information regarding the Florida Catalog of State Financial Assistance (CFSA), a recipient should access the Florida Single Audit Act website located at http://sun6.dms.state.fl.us/fsaa/catalo~.htm or the Governor's Office of Policy and Budget website located at http://www.eog.state.fl.us/for assistance. In addition to the above websites, the following websites may be accessed for information: Legislature's Website http://www.leg.state.fl.us/, Governor's Website http://www.fl~ov.com/, Department of Banking and Finance's Website http://www.dbf, state.fl.us/, and the Auditor General's Website http://www.state.fl.us/audgen. PART III: OTHER AUDIT REQUIREMENTS (NOTE: This part would be used to specify any additional audit requirements imposed by the State awarding entity that are solely a matter of that State awarding entity's policy (i.e., the audit is not required by Federal or State laws and is not in conflict with other Federal or State audit requirements). Pursuant to Section 215.97(7)(m), Florida Statutes, State agencies may conduct or arrange for audits of State financial assistance that are in addition to audits conducted in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. In such an event, the State awarding agency must arrange for funding the full cost of such additional audits.) PART IV: REPORT SUBMISSION Copies of reporting packages for audits conducted in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and required by PART I of this Agreement shall be submitted, when required by Section .320 (d), OMB Circular A-133, as revised, by or on behalf of the recipient directly to each of the following: A. The Department of Environmental Protection at each of the following addresses: Mary Ann Lee Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Design and Recreation Services 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS# 585 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 DEP 55-203 (02_-03) Page 2 of 4 Audit Director Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of the Inspector General, MS 40 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 The Federal Audit Clearinghouse designated in OMB Circular A-133, as revised (the number of copies required by Sections .320 (d)(1) and (2), OMB Circular A-133, as revised, should be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse), at the following address: Federal Audit Clearinghouse Bureau of the Census 1201 East 10th Street Jeffersonville, IN 47132 Co Other Federal agencies and pass-through entities in accordance with Sections .320 (e) and (f), OMB Circular A-133, as revised. Pursuant to Section .320(0, OMB Circular A-133, as revised, the recipient shall submit a copy of the reporting package described in Section .320(c), OMB Circular A-133, as revised, and any management letters issued by the auditor, to the Department of Environmental Protection at each of the following addresses: Mary Ann Lee Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Design and Recreation Services 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS# 585 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 Audit Director Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of the Inspector General, MS 40 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 Copies of financial reporting packages required by PART II of this Agreement shall be submitted by or on behalf of the recipient directly to each of the following: A. The Department of Environmental Protection at each of the following addresses: 3 Bo DEP 55-203 (02-03) Mary Ann Lee Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Design and Recreation Services 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS# 585 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 Audit Director Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of the Inspector General, MS 40 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 The Auditor General's Office at the following address: State of Florida Auditor General Room 401, Claude Pepper Building 111 West Madison Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1450 Page 3 of 4 Copies of reports or management letters required by PART III of this Agreement shall be submitted by or on behalf of the recipient directly to the Department of Environmental Protection at each of the following addresses: Mary Ann Lee Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Design and Recreation Services 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS# 585 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 Audit Director Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of the Inspector General, MS 40 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 Any reports, management letters, or other information required to be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted timely in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, Florida Statutes, or Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, as applicable. Recipients, when submitting financial reporting packages to the Department of Environmental Protection for audits done in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, or Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, should indicate the date that the reporting package was delivered to the recipient in correspondence accompanying the reporting package. PART V: RECORD RETENTION The recipient shall retain sufficient records demonstrating its compliance with the terms of this Agreement for a period of 5 (specify appropriate number of years, should be at least five years) years from the date the audit report is issued, and shall allow the Department of Environmental Protection, or its designee, Comptroller, or Auditor General access to such records upon request. The recipient shall ensure that audit working papers are made available to the Department of Environmental Protection, or its designee, Comptroller, or Auditor General upon request for a period of 3 (specify appropriate number of years) years from the date the audit report is issued, unless extended in writing by the Department of Environmental Protection. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DEP 55-203 (02-03) _Page 4 of 4 16El Contract # 02-3371 AGREEMENT FOR FIXED TERM PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this/f_/'~'-day of -'~,,,~,_~ ~,/ , 2002, by and between the Board of County Commissioners for Co er County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and (hereinafter referred to as the "OWNER") and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., a Florida Corporation, authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 1220 Tech Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33619-7832 (hereinafter referred to as the "CONSULTANT"). WlTNESSETH: WHEREAS, the OWNER desires to obtain Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services of the CONSULTANT concerning work and/or the improvement of areas within the operational jurisdiction of Collier County, such services to be performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement and with Work Orders to be issued by OWNER subsequent to execution of this Agreement; and in accordance with the conditions that each Work Order shall not exceed $90,000 and that total initial compensation for all Work Orders issued under this Agreement shall not exceed $500,000. WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT has submitted a proposal for provision of those services; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be required by the OWNER. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and provisions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE CONSULTANT'S RESPONSIBILITY 16£1 1.1. CONSULTANT shall provide to OWNER Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services in all phases of any Work Order to which this Agreement applies. 1.2. The Basic Services to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder are those set forth in this Agreement and Work Orders prepared and issued by the OWNER and executed by the parties hereto subsequent and pursuant to execution of the Agreement. The total compensation to be paid CONSULTANT by the OWNER for all Basic Services is set forth in Article Five and Schedule A, "Consultant's Employee Hourly Rate Schedule", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. 1.3. The CONSULTANT agrees to obtain and maintain throughout the period of this Agreement all such licenses as are required to do business in the State of Florida and in Collier County, Florida, including, but not limited to, all licenses required by the respective state boards and other governmental agencies responsible for regulating and licensing the professional services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement. 1.4. The CONSULTANT agrees that, when the services to be provided hereunder relate to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization or other form of legal entitlement to practice such services, it shall employ and/or retain only qualified personnel to provide such services. 1.5. CONSULTANT agrees to employ and designate a Work Manager in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving its Notice to Proceed under an executed Work Order. The Work Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of the CONSULTANT with respect to directing, coordinating and administering all aspects of the services to be provided 2 16El and performed under this Agreement and a Work Order. Within five (5) calendar days from the Notice to Proceed issued by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the OWNER a written statement, executed by the proper officers of the CONSULTANT, acknowledging that the Work Manager under the Work Order shall have full authority to bind and obligate the CONSULTANT on all matters arising out of or relating to such Work Order and this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the Work Manager shall devote whatever time is required to satisfactorily manage the services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder. The person selected by the CONSULTANT to serve as the Work Manager shall be subject to the prior approval and acceptance of the OWNER. 1.6. CONSULTANT agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of a written request from the OWNER, to promptly remove and replace the Work Manager, or any other personnel employed or retained by the CONSULTANT, or any subconsultants or subcontractors or any personnel of any such subconsultants or subcontractors engaged by the CONSULTANT to provide and perform services or work pursuant to the requirements of this Agreement, whom the OWNER shall request in writing to be removed, which request may be made by the OWNER with or without stating its cause to CONSULTANT. 1.7. The CONSULTANT has represented to the OWNER that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be performed pursuant to this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that all services to be provided by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the OWNER's review and approval and shall be in accordance with the generally accepted standards of professional practice in the State of Florida, as well as in accordance with all published laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations and requirements of any governmental agencies which regulate or have jurisdiction over the Project or the services to be provided and performed by CONSULTANT hereunder. In the event of any conflicts in these -3- 16El requirements, the CONSULTANT shall notify the OWNER of such conflict and utilize its best professional judgment to advise OWNER regarding resolution of each such conflict. 1.8. CONSULTANT agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third person, firm or organization, without OWNER's prior written consent, or unless incident to the proper performance of the CONSULTANT's obligations hereunder, or in the course of judicial or legislative proceedings where such information has been properly subpoenaed, any non-public information concerning the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder, and CONSULTANT shall require all of its employees, agents, subconsultants and subcontractors to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. 1.9. If required pursuant to a Work Order, CONSULTANT agrees to provide to OWNER professional evaluations of the OWNER'S work budget. The evaluations and opinions shall be delivered to OWNER in accordance with the following schedule: (a) The professional evaluations of the OWNER's work budget shall be delivered with the report to be furnished by CONSULTANT as part of the Scope of Services. 1.10. Evaluations of the OWNER'S budget, prepared by the CONSULTANT represent the CONSULTANT'S best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional Traffic Engineering consultant. ARTICLE TWO ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANT If authorized in writing by OWNER, CONSULTANT shall furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed in Article Two herein. These services will be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Article Five and Schedule A. The following services shall be Additional Basic Services: -4- 16El 2.1. Preparation of applications and supporting documents (except those already to be furnished under this Agreement) for private or governmental grants, loans, bond issues or advances. 2.2. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, OWNER's schedule or character of construction; and revising previously accepted studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents previously accepted by OWNER when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent to and not reasonably anticipated prior to the preparation of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond CONSULTANT's control. 2.3 Preparation and submission of information to and necessary consultations with the Collier County Transportation Department, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Transportation, South Florida Water Management District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or other appropriate regulatory agencies, in order to obtain necessary permits or approvals for construction of the Project. 2.4 Providing renderings or models for OWNER's use. 2.5. Investigations and studies involving detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; the preparation of feasibility studies, cash flow and economic evaluations, rate schedules and appraisals; and evaluating processes available for licensing and assisting OWNER in obtaining process licensing. 2.6. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other than the contract services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder. -5- 2,7, Services during out-of-town travel required of CONSULTANT and directed by OWNER, other than visits to the Project site or OWNER's office or local travel as defined herein. 2.8. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for construction, materials, equipment or services, except as otherwise provided for herein. 2.9. Providing any type of property surveys, aerial photography or related services needed for the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys for design purposes and engineering surveys and staking to enable contractors to proceed with their work and providing other special field surveys. 2.10. Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals, except as otherwise provided for herein. 2.11. Preparing to serve or serving as a CONSULTANT or witness for OWNER in any litigation, or other legal or administrative proceeding, involving the work (except for assistance in consultations which are included as part of the Basic Services to be provided herein). 2.12. Additional services rendered by CONSULTANTS not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in Collier County in accordance with generally accepted practice. ARTICLE THREE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1. The OWNER shall designate in writing a work coordinator to act as OWNER's representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement and a particular Work Order (hereinafter referred to as the "Work Coordinator"). The Work Coordinator shall have authority -6- 16£1 to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER's policies and decisions with respect to CONSULTANT's services for the work. However, the Work Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to the CONSULTANT that would have the effect, or be interpreted to have the effect, of modifying or changing in any way whatever: (a) The scope of services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder; (b) The time the CONSULTANT is obligated to commence and complete all such services; or (c) The amount of compensation the OWNER is obligated or committed to pay the CONSULTANT. 3.2. The Work Coordinator shall: (a) Review and make appropriate recommendations on all requests submitted by the CONSULTANT for payment for services and work provided and performed in accordance with this Agreement; (b) Provide all criteria and information requested by CONSULTANT as to OWNER's requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; (c) Upon request from CONSULTANT, assist CONSULTANT by placing at CONSULTANT's disposal all available information in the OWNER'S possession pertinent to the Project, including existing drawings, specifications, shop drawings, product literature, previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project (d) Arrange for access to and make all provisions for CONSULTANT to enter the site to perform the services to be provided by CONSULTANT under this Agreement; and _?_ (e) Provide notice to CONSULTANT of any deficiencies or defects discovered by the OWNER with respect to the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder. 3.3. CONSULTANT acknowledges that access to any work site, to be arranged by OWNER for CONSULTANT, may be provided during times that are not the normal business hours of the CONSULTANT. 3.4. OWNER shall be responsible for the acquisition of all easements, property sites, rights-of-way, or other property rights required for the work and for the costs thereof, including the costs of any required land surveys in connection with such acquisition. ARTICLE FOUR TIME 4.1. The period of service shall be from the date of execution of this Agreement through two (2) years from that date, or until such time as all outstanding Work Orders issued prior to the expiration of the Agreement period have been completed. This Agreement may be renewed for an additional two (2) years, renewable annually. Renewal shall be agreed to, in writing, by both parties. 4.2. Services to be rendered by CONSULTANT shall be commenced subsequent to the execution of this Agreement upon written Notice to Proceed from OWNER for all or any designated portion of the project established by a Work Order and shall be performed and completed in accordance with such Work Order. Time is of the essence with respect to the performance of this Agreement. 4.3 Should CONSULTANT be obstructed or delayed in the prosecution or completion of its services as a result of unforeseeable causes beyond the control of CONSULTANT, and not due to its own fault or neglect, including but not restricted to acts of nature or of public enemy, acts of government or of the OWNER, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine regulations, strikes or -8- lock-outs, then OONSULT^NT sh~ll notify O~NER in writing within five (5~ working d~ys ~fter commencement of such del~y, stating the ¢~use or c~uses thereof, or b~ deemed to h~ve w~ived ~ny right which OONSULT^NT m~y h~ve h~d to request ~ time extension. 4.4. No interruption, interference, inefficiency, suspension or delay in the commencement or progress of CONSULTANT's services from any cause whatsoever, including those for which OWNER may be responsible in whole or in part, shall relieve CONSULTANT of its duty to perform or give rise to any right to damages or additional compensation from OWNER. CONSULTANT's sole remedy against OWNER will be the right to seek an extension of time to its schedule. This paragraph shall expressly apply to claims for early completion, as well as claims based on late completion. Provided, however, if through no fault or neglect of the CONSULTANT, the services to be provided hereunder by CONSULTANT have not been completed within two (2) calendar years of a Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT's compensation may be equitably adjusted, with respect to those services that have not yet been performed, to reflect the incremental increase in costs experienced by CONSULTANT after expiration of the two year period, plus all time extensions granted by OWNER to CONSULTANT. 4.5. Should the CONSULTANT fail to commence, provide, perform or complete any of the services to be provided hereunder in a timely and reasonable manner, in addition to any other rights or remedies available to the OWNER hereunder, the OWNER at its sole discretion and option may withhold any and all payments due and owing to the CONSULTANT until such time as the CONSULTANT resumes performance of its obligations hereunder in such a manner so as to reasonably establish to the OWNER's satisfaction that the CONSULTANT's performance is or will shortly be back on schedule. -9- ARTICLE FIVE COMPENSATION 16£1 5.1. The COUNTY will compensate the CONSULTANT for the services performed on each Work Order in accordance with a negotiated lump sum, cost plus fixed fee, or established hourly rate as provided in Schedule A attached hereto. 5.2. Subcontractual services, if any, shall be invoiced by the CONSULTANT at the actual fees paid by the CONSULTANT. 5.3. Reimbursable expenses shall be invoiced for the expenditures incurred by the CONSULTANT as follows: 5.3.1. Expenses of transportation and living when traveling in connection with each Work Order, except for local travel within Collier or Lee Counties, as provided in Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, and fees paid for securing approval of authorities have jurisdiction over the Work Order. 5.3.2. Expenses of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings and Specifications including duplicate sets at the completion of each Work Order for the County's review and approval. 5.3.3. Expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, when authorized by the County. 5.3.4. Expense of models for the County's use. 5.4. Total compensation for all services and expenses shall not exceed the limit listed upon each Work Order without written approval. -10- 16El 5.5. Total initial compensation for all services and expenses shall not exceed $90,000 per Work Order and total contract limit shall not exceed $500,000. 5.6. Payments for Basic Services, Additional Basic Services, Subcontractual Services, and Reimbursable Expenses as defined in Section V, shall be made upon presentation of the CONSULTANT's County-approved itemized invoice. 5.7. Records of Reimbursable Expenses and Expenses pertaining to Additional Basic Services on the Work Order shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis and shall be available and provided to the County with submittal of invoices. ARTICLE SIX OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 6.1.. Upon completion or termination of this Agreement, all records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer assisted design or drafting disks and other technical data, prepared or developed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall be delivered to and become the property of OWNER. This does not apply to working papers. Said records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer disks and other technical data prepared by the CONSULTANT for each project under this Agreement are considered to be instruments of the CONSULTANT'S service. CONSULTANT, at its own expense, may retain copies for its files and internal use. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold harmless CONSULTANT with respect to any claim brought by any third party against CONSULTANT, including loss or damage from the claim including attorneys fees incurred by CONSULTANT, which claim arises out of OWNER's use of said records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer disks and other technical data on some other project unless such use is authorized by CONSULTANT. -11- 6.2. With respect to and in consideration for the indemnification provided by OWNER in paragraphs 6.1. above, CONSULTANT has paid to OWNER $10.00, the sufficiency and receipt of which is acknowledged by OWNER through the signing of this Agreement. ARTICLE SEVEN MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS 7.1. CONSULTANT will keep adequate records and supporting documentation which concern or reflect its services hereunder. The records and documentation will be retained by CONSULTANT for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of termination of this Agreement or the date the work is completed, whichever is later. OWNER, or any duly authorized agents or representatives of OWNER, shall, free of charge, have the right to audit, inspect and copy all such records and documentation as often as they deem necessary during the period of this Agreement and during the five (5) year period noted above; provided, however, such activity shall be conducted only during normal business hours. ARTICLE EIGHT INDEMNIFICATION 8.1. The CONSULTANT in consideration of $100.00, the sufficiency and receipt of which is acknowledged through the signing of this Agreement shall indemnify and hold OWNER and its officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney fees to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentional wrongful conduct of the CONSULTANT, its Subconsultants, Subcontractors, agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement or work performed thereunder. The CONSULTANT'S obligation under this paragraph shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Agreement or the CONSULTANT'S limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. 6.2. CONSULTANT acknowledges that the general conditions of any construction contract that CONSULTANT creates in performance of a Work Order shall include language, satisfactory to -]2- the OWNER's attorney, in which the contractor agrees to hold harmless and to defend OWNER, its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorney's fees, and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of the construction contract or work performed thereunder. ARTICLE NINE INSURANCE 9.1. During the life of the Agreement (and until final acceptance by Owner for work performed under any Work Order issued by Owner) the CONSULTANT shall provide, pay for, and maintain, with companies satisfactory to the OWNER, the type and amounts of insurance described herein and on Exhibit B. All insurance shall be from responsible companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida and/or responsible risk retention group insurance companies registered with the State of Florida. Promptly after written Notice of Award is issued by the OWNER, the insurance coverages and limits required must be evidenced by properly executed Certificates of Insurance on forms which are acceptable to the OWNER. The Certificates must be personally, manually signed by the Authorized Representatives of the insurance company/companies shown on the Certificate with proof that he/she is an authorized representative thereof. In addition, certified, true and exact copies of all insurance policies required shall be provided to the OWNER, on a timely basis, if required by the OWNER. These Certificates and policies shall contain provisions that thirty (30) days written notice by registered or certified mail shall be given to the OWNER of any cancellation, intent not to renew, or reduction in the policies' coverages, except in the application of the Aggregate Limits Provisions. In the event of a reduction in the Aggregate Limits of any policy, the CONSULTANT shall immediately take steps to have the Aggregate Limit reinstated to the full extent permitted under such policy. All insurance coverages of the CONSULTANT shall be primary to any insurance or self-insurance program carried by the OWNER applicable to the Work. -13- 16El 9.2. The acceptance by the OWNER of any Certificate of Insurance evidencing the insurance coverages and limits required in this Agreement does not constitute approval or agreement by the OWNER that the insurance requirements have been met or that the insurance policies shown on the Certificates of Insurance are in compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. 9.3. No work shall commence unless and until the required Certificates of Insurance are received and the written Notice to Proceed is issued to the CONSULTANT by the OWNER. 9.4. Promptly after written Notice of Award is issued by the OWNER and prior to approving any work CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain insurance of the types and to the limits specified in Schedule B entitled "Insurance Coverage", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. CONSULTANT shall require each of its subconsultants and subcontractors to procure and maintain, until the completion of that subconsultant's or subcontractor's work, insurance of the types and to the limits specified in Schedule B, unless such insurance requirement for the subconsultant or subcontractor is expressly waived in writing by the OWNER. Said waiver shall not be unreasonably withheld upon CONSULTANT representing in writing to OWNER that CONSULTANT's existing coverage includes and covers the subconsultants and subcontractors for which a waiver is sought, and that such coverage is in conformance with the types and limits of insurance specified in Schedule B. All liability insurance policies, other than the Professional Liability, Worker's Compensation and Employers' Liability policies, obtained by CONSULTANT to meet the requirements of this Agreement shall name OWNER as an additional insured as to the operations of the CONSULTANT under this Agreement and the Contract Documents and shall contain severability of interests provisions. 9.5. If any insurance provided pursuant to this Agreement expires prior to the completion and final acceptance by Owner of any works, performed hereunder, renewal Certificates of -14- 16 '1 Insurance and, if requested by Owner, certified, true copies of the renewal policies shall be furnished by CONSULTANT thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration. 9.6. Should at any time the CONSULTANT not maintain the insurance coverages required in this Agreement, the OWNER may cancel this Agreement or at its sole discretion shall be authorized to purchase such coverages and charge the CONSULTANT for such coverages purchased. The OWNER shall be under no obligation to purchase such insurance, nor shall it be responsible for the coverages purchased or the insurance company or companies used. The decision of the OWNER to purchase such insurance coverages shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of its rights under this Agreement. ARTICLE TEN SERVICES BY CONSULTANT'S OWN STAFF 10.1. The services to be performed hereunder shall be performed by CONSULTANT's own staff, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the OWNER. The employment of, contract with, or use of the services of any other person or firm by CONSULTANT, as independent consultant or otherwise, shall be subject to the prior written approval of the OWNER. No provision of this Agreement shall, however, be construed as constituting an agreement between the OWNER and any such other person or firm. Nor shall anything in this Agreement be deemed to give any such party or any third party any claim or right of action against the OWNER beyond such as may otherwise exist without regard to this Agreement. ARTICLE ELEVEN WAIVER OF CLAIMS 11.1. CONSULTANT's acceptance of final payment under any Work Order shall constitute a full waiver of any and all claims, except for insurance company subrogation claims, by it against OWNER arising out of this Agreement or otherwise related to the work, except those previously made in writing and identified by CONSULTANT as unsettled at the time of the final payment. -]5- Neither the acceptance of CONSULTANT's services nor payment by OWNER shall be deemed to be a waiver of any of OWNER's rights against CONSULTANT. ARTICLE TWELVE TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 12.1. CONSULTANT shall be considered in material default of this Agreement and such default will be considered cause for OWNER to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, as further set forth in this section, for any of the following reasons: (a) failure to begin work under the Agreement within the times specified under the Notice(s) to Proceed, or (b) failure to properly and timely perform the services to be provided hereunder or as directed by OWNER, or (c) the bankruptcy or insolvency or a general assignment for the benefit of creditors by CONSULTANT or by any of CONSULTANT's principals, officers or directors, or (d) failure to obey laws, ordinances, regulations or other codes of conduct, or (e) failure to perform or abide by the terms or spirit of this Agreement, or (f) for any other just cause. The OWNER may so terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, by giving the CONSULTANT seven (7) calendar day~ written notice of the material default. 12.2. If, after notice of termination of this Agreement as provided for in paragraph 12.1 above, it is determined for any reason that CONSULTANT was not in default, or that its default was excusable, or that OWNER otherwise was not entitled to the remedy against CONSULTANT provided for in paragraph 12.1, then the notice of termination given pursuant to paragraph 12.1 shall be deemed to be the notice of termination provided for in paragraph 12.3 below and CONSULTANT's remedies against OWNER shall be the same as and limited to those afforded CONSULTANT under paragraph 12.3 below. 12.3. OWNER shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, without cause upon seven (7) calendar days written notice to CONSULTANT. In the event of such termination for convenience, CONSULTANT's recovery against OWNER shall be limited to that -]6- portion of the fee earned through the date of termination, together with any retai6age withheld and any costs reasonably incurred by CONSULTANT that are directly attributable to the termination, but CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to any other or further recovery against OWNER, including, but not limited to, anticipated fees or profits on work not required to be performed. CONSULTANT must mitigate all such costs to the greatest extent reasonably possible. 12.4. Upon termination, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the OWNER all original papers, records, documents, drawings, models, and other material set forth and described in this Agreement including Section 6.1. 12.5. The OWNER shall have the power to suspend all or any portions of the services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder upon giving CONSULTANT two (2) calendar days prior written notice of such suspension. If all or any portion of the services to be rendered hereunder are so suspended, the CONSULTANT's sole and exclusive remedy shall be to seek an extension of time to its schedule in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article Four herein. ARTICLE THIRTEEN TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION REPRESENTATIONS 13.1. CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement and that CONSULTANT has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. -17- 16El 13.2. In accordance with provisions of Section 287.055, (5)(a), Florida Statutes, the CONSULTANT agrees to execute the required Truth-In-Negotiation Certificate, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Schedule C, stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation are accurate, complete and current at the time of the Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the original Agreement price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the OWNER determines the Agreement price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such adjustments shall be made within one (1) year following the end of this Agreement. ARTICLE FOURTEEN CONFLICT OF INTEREST 14.1. CONSULTANT represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. ARTICLE FIFTEEN MODIFICATION 15.1. No modification or change in this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon either party unless in writing and executed by the party or parties intended to be bound by it. ARTICLE SIXTEEN NOTICES AND ADDRESS OF RECORD 16.1. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the CONSULTANT to the OWNER shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following OWNER's address of record: Board of County Commissioners, Collier County Florida Purchasing Department 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FI. 34112 Attention: Purchasing Director 16El 16.2. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT shall be made in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by the United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following CONSULTANT's address of record: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1220 Tech Boulevard Tampa, FL 33619-7832 Attention: Jerry W. Ingram, P.E. 16.3. Either party may change its address of record by written notice to the other party given in accordance with requirements of this Article. ARTICLE SEVENTEEN MISCELLANEOUS 17.1. CONSULTANT, in representing OWNER, shall promote the best interest of OWNER and assume towards OWNER a duty of the highest trust, confidence, and fair dealing. 17.2. No modification, waiver, suspension or termination of the Agreement or of any terms thereof shall impair the rights or liabilities of either party. 17.3. This Agreement is not assignable, or otherwise transferable in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of OWNER. 17.4. Waiver by either party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement. -]9- 16El 17.5. The headings of the Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments as contained in this Agreement are for the purpose of convenience only and shall not be deemed to expand, limit or change the provisions in such Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments. 17.6. This Agreement, initially consisting of 26 continuously numbered pages including the referenced Schedules and Attachments hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and shall supersede, replace and nullify any and all prior agreements or understandings, written or oral, relating to the matter set forth herein, and any such prior agreements or understanding shall have no force or effect whatever on this Agreement. 17.7 COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS AGREEMENT. This Agreement consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the Agreement as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, RFP #02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services", Consultant's Fee Schedule "A", Insurance Coverage Schedule "B", Truth in Negotiation Schedule "C". ARTICLE EIGHTEEN APPLICABLE LAW 18.1. Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the laws, rules, and regulations of the State of Florida, and by such laws, rules and regulations of the United States as made applicable to when providing services funded by the United States government. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate Florida state court in Collier County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Professional Services Agreement for Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services the day and year first written above. -20- ATTESTi,. Dwight E. Breck,'C~rk Approved as to form and /C Ass~tan~ou~°rn,y Witnessed: (CORPORATE SEAL) 16£1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA By: j~ Kimley-Horn and Associates~ Inc. (Type name): (Title): -21- SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE A Collier County Standard Fee Schedule RFP 02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services" Professional Credentials Principal P.E. $150.00/hr Project Manager P.E. $[00.00/hr Senior Planner/Engineer A.T.C.P. or P.E. $100.00/hr Planner/Engineer A.I.C.P. or P.E. $90.00/hr Senior Technician $55.00/hr Technician $45.00/hr Suo~ort Administrative Assistant, Secretary $45.00/hr Clerical, other support $35.00/hr 6£! This list is not intended to be all-inclusive. The County and firm on a project-by-project basis as needed shall mutually negotiate hourly rate fees for other categories of professional, support and other services. END OF SCHEDULE A -22- SCHEDULE B INSURANCE COVERAGE 16El (1) The amounts and types of insurance coverage shall conform to the following minimum requirements with the use of Insurance Services Office (ISO) forms and endorsements or their equivalents. WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Insurance shall be maintained by the Contractor/Consultant/Professional during the term of this Agreement for all employees engaged in the work under this Agreement in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The amounts of such insurance shall not be less than: a. Worker's Compensation - Florida Statutory Requirements b. Employers' Liability (check one) X $100,000 Each Accident $500,000 Disease Aggregate $100,000 Disease Each Employee (2) The insurance company shall waive its Rights of Subrogation against the Owner and the policy shall be so endorsed. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Insurance shall be maintained by the Contractor/Consultant/Professional. Coverage will include, but not be limited to, Bodily Injury, Property Damage, Personal Injury, Contractual Liability for this Agreement, Independent Contractors, Broad Form Property Damage including Completed Operations and Products and Completed Operations Coverage. Products and Completed Operations coverage shall be maintained for a period of not less than five (5) years following the completion and acceptance -23- by the Owner of the work under this Agreement. following: (check one) X General Aggregate Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Personal and Advertising Injury Each Occurrence Fire Damage Limits of Liability shall not be less than the $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $ 50,000 (2) The General Aggregate Limit shall apply separately to this Project and the policy shall be endorsed using the following endorsement wording. "This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: Commercial General Liability Coverage Part. The General Aggregate Limit under LIMITS OF INSURANCE applies separately to each of your projects away from premises owned by or rented to you." (3) If the General Liability insurance required herein is issued or renewed on a "claims made" basis, as opposed to the "occurrence" form, the retroactive date for coverage shall be no later than the commencement date of the Project and shall provide that in the event of cancellation or non-renewal the Extended Reporting Period (Discovery Period) for claims shall be no less than three (3) years. (4) The Owner shall be named as an Additional Insured and the policy shall be endorsed that such coverage shall be primary to any similar coverage carried by the Owner. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE shall be maintained by the Contractor / Consultant / Professional for the ownership, maintenance or use of any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle with limits of not less than: (check one) X Bodily Injury & Property Damage - $ 500,000 PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE shall be maintained by the Consultant/Professional to insure its legal liability for claims arising out of the performance of professional services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall have limits of not less than X $1,000,000 each claim and in the aggregate -24- (2) Any deductible applicable to any claim shall be the sole Consultant/Professional and shall not be greater than $50,000 each claim. responsibility of the (3) The Consultant/Professional shall continue this coverage for this Project for a period of not less than five (5) years following completion and acceptance of the Project by the Owner. END OF SCHEDULE B. -25- Fl~ :~rcr~b~e Ins Fl~X NO. :cJB43c~6137 Oct,, 14 10/14/02 HON 10:51 [TX/RZ NO 5235I ACORD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 10.4/02 PRODUCER TIIIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION BB&T Insurance Services, Inc. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTH~CATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 7823 National Service Road ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 2nd Floor Greensboro, NC 27419 IN--RS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED INSURER A: Security Insurance Co of Hartford Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. INSURER B: Attn: Mindy Zeni INSURER C: PO Box 33068 INSURER D: Raleigh, NC 27636 I INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDIN( ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. 1N'SRI ; POLICY EFFECTIVE ]POLICY EXI~IRATION I LTR I TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE (M~M/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIAB IL1TY i FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ l i [ CLAIMS MADE II OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ GEN'LAGGREGATELIMITAPPLIES PER: PRODUCTS -COMP/OPAGG $ I POLICY [~PRO'JECT ~-~ LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT ANY AUTO I (Ha accident) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY : $ i . SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $ (Per occident) ~I NON-OWNED AUTOS i ,! PROPERTY DAMAGE $ Ii I (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTOONLY: AGG ~ $ EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ I OCCUR ~] CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ $ WC STATU- WO~ COMPENSATION AND ' I I OTH- EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ! ! E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ I E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE! $ E.L. DISEASE ~ POLICY LIMIT I $ A ,ormm Professional PLl19905 08101102 08101104 Limit: $1,000,000 Liability DESC~m'rIoN OF O~R~ONSmOCATXO~S~r£mCLESmXCLUSIONS ~d~DED E¥ ~m)ORSm~NT/S~CX~ PROWS~O~S Contract 02-3371 Fi×e Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services KHA Project Mgr: Angelo Rao CERTIFICATE HOLDER I ' ADDIIIONALIWSURED;~NSURERLETIER: CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLIE]ES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXP~.AT~ON Collier County Board of County C DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILLENDEAVOR TOMAIL.~[O DAYS WR/rIEN Att: Kelsey Ward NOTg2E TOTIIE CERT~'K2ATE HOLDERNAMED TOTHE LEFT, BUTFAILURE TODOSOSHALL Purchasing Building IMPOSE NOOBLIGATION OR LIABIL1TYOFANYKIND UPON THE INSUKER,1TS AGENTS OR 3301 E. Tamiami Trail RE~s~.~rnTr~S. INaples, FL 34112 AtnmO~UZEDRE .~~4~~..~. -- . ACORD 25-S (7/97) 1 of 2 #S711g01/M61838¢ ~ ~ ! ~ ~I~[~ORATION 1988 SCHEDULE C TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE 16£1 In compliance with the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act, Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. hereby certifies that wages, rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation for the Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services of the CONSULTANT to be provided under the Professional Services Agreement are accurate, complete and current as of the time of contracting. BY: DATE: -26- 16El Contract # 02-3371 AGREEMENT FOR FIXED TERM PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ,,/~' day of -/. 2002, by and between the Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and (hereinafter referred to as the "OWNER") and PBS&J a Florida Corporation, authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 5300 W. Cypress Street, Suite 300, Tampa, FL 33607 (hereinafter referred to as the "CONSULTANT"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the OWNER desires to obtain Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services of the CONSULTANT concerning work and/or the improvement of areas within the operational jurisdiction of Collier County, such services to be performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement and with Work Orders to be issued by OWNER subsequent to execution of this Agreement; and in accordance with the conditions that each Work Order shall not exceed $90,000 and that total initial compensation for all Work Orders issued under this Agreement shall not exceed $500,000. WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT has submitted a proposal for provision of those services; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be required by the OWNER. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and provisions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: the mutual covenants and ARTICLE ONE CONSULTANT'S RESPONSIBILITY 16El 1.1. CONSULTANT shall provide to OWNER Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services in all phases of any Work Order to which this Agreement applies. 1.2. The Basic Services to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder are those set forth in this Agreement and Work Orders prepared and issued by the OWNER and executed by the parties hereto subsequent and pursuant to execution of the Agreement. The total compensation to be paid CONSULTANT by the OWNER for all Basic Services is set forth in Article Five and Schedule A, "Consultant's Employee Hourly Rate Schedule", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. 1.3. The CONSULTANT agrees to obtain and maintain throughout the period of this Agreement all such licenses as are required to do business in the State of Florida and in Collier County, Florida, including, but not limited to, all licenses required by the respective state boards and other governmental agencies responsible for regulating and licensing the professional services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement. 1.4. The CONSULTANT agrees that, when the services to be provided hereunder relate to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization or other form of legal entitlement to practice such services, it shall employ and/or retain only qualified personnel to provide such services. 1.5. CONSULTANT agrees to employ and designate a Work Manager in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving its Notice to Proceed under an executed Work Order. The Work Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of the CONSULTANT with respect to directing, coordinating and administering all aspects of the services to be provided and performed under this Agreement and a Work Order. Within five (5) calendar days from the Notice to Proceed issued by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the OWNER a written statement, executed by the proper officers of the CONSULTANT, acknowledging that the Work Manager under the Work Order shall have full authority to bind and obligate the CONSULTANT on all matters arising out of or relating to such Work Order and this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the Work Manager shall devote whatever time is required to satisfactorily manage the services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder. The person selected by the CONSULTANT to serve as the Work Manager shall be subject to the prior approval and acceptance of the OWNER. 1.6. CONSULTANT agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of a written request from the OWNER, to promptly remove and replace the Work Manager, or any other personnel employed or retained by the CONSULTANT, or any subconsultants or subcontractors or any personnel of any such subconsultants or subcontractors engaged by the CONSULTANT to provide and perform services or work pursuant to the requirements of this Agreement, whom the OWNER shall request in writing to be removed, which request may be made by the OWNER with or without stating its cause to CONSULTANT. 1.7. The CONSULTANT has represented to the OWNER that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be performed pursuant to this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that all services to be provided by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the OWNER's review and approval and shall be in accordance with the generally accepted standards of professional practice in the State of Florida, as well as in accordance with all published laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations and requirements of any governmental agencies which regulate or have jurisdiction over the Project or the services to be provided and performed by CONSULTANT hereunder. In the event of any conflicts in these -3- requirements, the CONSULTANT shall notify the OWNER of such conflict and utilize its best professional judgment to advise OWNER regarding resolution of each such conflict. 1.8. CONSULTANT agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third person, firm or organization, without OWNER's prior written consent, or unless incident to the proper performance of the CONSULTANT's obligations hereunder, or in the course of judicial or legislative proceedings where such information has been properly subpoenaed, any non-public information concerning the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder, and CONSULTANT shall require all of its employees, agents, subconsultants and subcontractors to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. 1.9. If required pursuant to a Work Order, CONSULTANT agrees to provide to OWNER professional evaluations of the OWNER'S work budget. The evaluations and opinions shall be delivered to OWNER in accordance with the following schedule: (a) The professional evaluations of the OWNER's work budget shall be delivered with the report to be furnished by CONSULTANT as part of the Scope of Services. 1.10. Evaluations of the OWNER'S budget, prepared by the CONSULTANT represent the CONSULTANT'S best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional Traffic Engineering consultant. ARTICLE TWO ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANT If authorized in writing by OWNER, CONSULTANT shall furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed in Article Two herein. These services will be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Article Five and Schedule A. The following services shall be Additional Basic Services: -4- 2.1. Preparation of applications and supporting documents (except those furnished under this Agreement) for private or governmental grants, loans, advances. 16El already to be bond issues or 2.2. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, OWNER's schedule or character of construction; and revising previously accepted studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents previously accepted by OWNER when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent to and not reasonably anticipated prior to the preparation of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond CONSULTANT's control. 2.3 Preparation and submission of information to and necessary consultations with the Collier County Transportation Department, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Transportation, South Florida Water Management District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or other appropriate regulatory agencies, in order to obtain necessary permits or approvals for construction of the Project. 2.4 Providing renderings or models for OWNER's use. 2.5. Investigations and studies involving detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; the preparation of feasibility studies, cash flow and economic evaluations, rate schedules and appraisals; and evaluating processes available for licensing and assisting OWNER in obtaining process licensing. 2.6. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other than the contract services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder. -5- 2.7. Services during out-of-town travel required of CONSULTANT and directed by OWNER, other than visits to the Project site or OWNER's office or local travel as defined herein. 2.8. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for construction, materials, equipment or services, except as otherwise provided for herein. 2.9. Providing any type of property surveys, aerial photography or related services needed for the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys for design purposes and engineering surveys and staking to enable contractors to proceed with their work and providing other special field surveys. 2.10. Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals, except as otherwise provided for herein. 2.11. Preparing to serve or serving as a CONSULTANT or witness for OWNER in any litigation, or other legal or administrative proceeding, involving the work (except for assistance in consultations which are included as part of the Basic Services to be provided herein). 2.12. Additional services rendered by CONSULTANTS not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in Collier County in accordance with generally accepted practice. ARTICLE THREE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1. The OWNER shall designate in writing a work coordinator to act representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement particular Work Order (hereinafter referred to as the "Work Coordinator"). The Coordinator shall have authority as OWNER's and a Work -6- to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER's policies and decisions with respect to CONSULTANT's services for the work. However, the Work Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to the CONSULTANT that would have the effect, or be interpreted to have the effect, of modifying or changing in any way whatever: (a) The scope of services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder; (b) The time the CONSULTANT is obligated to commence and complete all such services; or (c) The amount of compensation the OWNER is obligated or committed to pay the CONSULTANT. 3.2. The Work Coordinator shall: (a) Review and make appropriate recommendations on all requests submitted by the CONSULTANT for payment for services and work provided and performed in accordance with this Agreement; (b) Provide all criteria and information requested by CONSULTANT as to OWNER's requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; (c) Upon request from CONSULTANT, assist CONSULTANT by placing at CONSULTANT's disposal all available information in the OWNER'S possession pertinent to the Project, including existing drawings, specifications, shop drawings, product literature, previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project (d) Arrange for access to and make all provisions for CONSULTANT to enter the site to perform the services to be provided by CONSULTANT under this Agreement; and (e) Provide notice to CONSULTANT of any deficiencies or defects discovered by the OWNER with respect to the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder. 3.3. CONSULTANT acknowledges that access to any work site, to be arranged by OWNER for CONSULTANT, may be provided during times that are not the normal business hours of the CONSULTANT. 3.4. OWNER shall be responsible for the acquisition of all easements, property sites, rights-of-way, or other property rights required for the work and for the costs thereof, including the costs of any required land surveys in connection with such acquisition. ARTICLE FOUR TIME 4.1. The period of service shall be from the date of execution of this Agreement through two (2) years from that date, or until such time as all outstanding Work Orders issued prior to the expiration of the Agreement period have been completed. This Agreement may be renewed for an additional two (2) years, renewable annually. Renewal shall be agreed to, in writing, by both parties. 4.2. Services to be rendered by CONSULTANT shall be commenced subsequent to the execution of this Agreement upon written Notice to Proceed from OWNER for all or any designated portibn of the project established by a Work Order and shall be performed and completed in accordance with such Work Order. Time is of the essence with respect to the performance of this Agreement. 4.3 Should CONSULTANT be obstructed or delayed in the prosecution or completion of its services as a result of unforeseeable causes beyond the control of CONSULTANT, and not due to its own fault or neglect, including but not restricted to acts of nature or of public enemy, acts of government or of the OWNER, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine regulations, strikes or -8- lock-outs, then CONSULTANT shall notify OWNER in writing within five (5) working days after commencement of such delay, stating the cause or causes thereof, or be deemed to have waived any right which CONSULTANT may have had to request a time extension. 4.4. No interruption, interference, inefficiency, suspension or delay in the commencement or progress of CONSULTANT's services from any cause whatsoever, including those for which OWNER may be responsible in whole or in part, shall relieve CONSULTANT of its duty to perform or give rise to any right to damages or additional compensation from OWNER. CONSULTANT's sole remedy against OWNER will be the right to seek an extension of time to its schedule. This paragraph shall expressly apply to claims for early completion, as well as claims based on late completion. Provided, however, if through no fault or neglect of the CONSULTANT, the services to be provided hereunder by CONSULTANT have not been completed within two (2) calendar years of a Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT's compensation may be equitably adjusted, with respect to those services that have not yet been performed, to reflect the incremental increase in costs experienced by CONSULTANT after expiration of the two year period, plus all time extensions granted by OWNER to CONSULTANT. 4.5. Should the CONSULTANT fail to commence, provide, perform or complete any of the services to be provided hereunder in a timely and reasonable manner, in addition to any other rights or remedies available to the OWNER hereunder, the OWNER at its sole discretion and option may withhold any and all payments due and owing to the CONSULTANT until such time as the CONSULTANT resumes performance of its obligations hereunder in such a manner so as to reasonably establish to the OWNER's satisfaction that the CONSULTANT's performance is or will shortly be back on schedule. -9- ARTICLE FIVE COMPENSATION 5.1. The COUNTY will compensate the CONSULTANT for the services performed on each Work Order in accordance with a negotiated lump sum, cost plus fixed fee, or established hourly rate as provided in Schedule A attached hereto. 5.2. Subcontractual services, if any, shall be invoiced by the CONSULTANT at the actual fees paid by the CONSULTANT. 5.3. Reimbursable expenses shall be invoiced for the expenditures incurred by the CONSULTANT as follows: 5.3.1. Expenses of transportation and living when traveling in connection with each Work Order, except for local travel within Collier or Lee Counties, as provided in Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, and fees paid for securing approval of authorities have jurisdiction over the Work Order. 5.3.2. Expenses of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings and Specifications including duplicate sets at the completion of each Work Order for the County's review and approval. 5.3.3. Expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, when authorized by the County. 5.3.4. Expense of models for the County's use. 5.4. Total compensation for all services and expenses shall not exceed the limit listed upon each Work Order without written approval. 5.5, ISE1 Total initial compensation for all services and expenses shall not exceed $90,000 per Work Order and total contract limit shall not exceed $500,000. 5.6. Payments for Basic Services, Additional Basic Services, Subcontractual Services, and Reimbursable Expenses as defined in Section V, shall be made upon presentation of the CONSULTANT's County-approved itemized invoice. 5.7. Records of Reimbursable Expenses and Expenses pertaining to Additional Basic Services on the Work Order shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis and shall be available and provided to the County with submittal of invoices. ARTICLE SIX OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 6.1. Upon completion or termination of this Agreement, all records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer assisted design or drafting disks and other technical data, prepared or developed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall be delivered to and become the property of OWNER. This does not apply to working papers. Said records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer disks and other technical data prepared by the CONSULTANT for each project under this Agreement are considered to be instruments of the CONSULTANT'S service. CONSULTANT, at its own expense, may retain copies for its files and internal use. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold harmless CONSULTANT with respect to any claim brought by any third party against CONSULTANT, including loss or damage from the claim including attorneys fees incurred by CONSULTANT, which claim arises out of OWNER's use of said records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer disks and other technical data on some other project unless such use is authorized by CONSULTANT. -11- 16E1 6.2. With respect to and in consideration for the indemnification provided by OWNER in paragraphs 6.1. above, CONSULTANT has paid to OWNER $10.00, the sufficiency and receipt of which is acknowledged by OWNER through the signing of this Agreement. ARTICLE SEVEN MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS 7.1. CONSULTANT will keep adequate records and supporting documentation which concern or reflect its services hereunder. The records and documentation will be retained by CONSULTANT for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of termination of this Agreement or the date the work is completed, whichever is later. OWNER, or any duly authorized agents or representatives of OWNER, shall, free of charge, have the right to audit, inspect and copy all such records and documentation as often as they deem necessary during the period of this Agreement and during the five (5) year period noted above; provided, however, such activity shall be conducted only during normal business hours. ARTICLE EIGHT INDEMNIFICATION 8.1. The CONSULTANT in consideration of $100.00, the sufficiency and receipt of which is acknowledged through the signing of this Agreement shall indemnify and hold OWNER and its officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney fees to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentional wrongful conduct of the CONSULTANT, its Subconsultants, Subcontractors, agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement or work performed thereunder. The CONSULTANT'S obligation under this paragraph shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Agreement or the CONSULTANT'S limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. 8.2. CONSULTANT acknowledges that the general conditions of any construction contract that CONSULTANT creates in performance of a Work Order shall include language, satisfactory to -]2- the OWNER's attorney, in which the contractor agrees to hold harmless and to defend OWNER, its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorney's fees, and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of the construction contract or work performed thereunder. ARTICLE NINE INSURANCE 9.1. During the life of the Agreement (and until final acceptance by Owner for work performed under any Work Order issued by Owner) the CONSULTANT shall provide, pay for, and maintain, with companies satisfactory to the OWNER, the type and amounts of insurance described herein and on Exhibit B. All insurance shall be from responsible companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida and/or responsible risk retention group insurance companies registered with the State of Florida. Promptly after written Notice of Award is issued by the OWNER, the insurance coverages and limits required must be evidenced by properly executed Certificates of Insurance on forms which are acceptable to the OWNER. The Certificates must be personally, manually signed by the Authorized Representatives of the insurance company/companies shown on the Certificate with proof that he/she is an authorized representative thereof. In addition, certified, true and exact copies of all insurance policies required shall be provided to the OWNER, on a timely basis, if required by the OWNER. These Certificates and policies shall contain provisions that thirty (30) days written notice by registered or certified mail shall be given to the OWNER of any cancellation, intent not to renew, or reduction in the policies' coverages, except in the application of the Aggregate Limits Provisions. In the event of a reduction in the Aggregate Limits of any policy, the CONSULTANT shall immediately take steps to have the Aggregate Limit reinstated to the full extent permitted under such policy. All insurance coverages of the CONSULTANT shall be primary to any insurance or self-insurance program carried by the OWNER applicable to the Work. 9.2. The acceptance by the OWNER of any Certificate of Insurance evidencing the insurance coverages and limits required in this Agreement does not constitute approval or agreement by the OWNER that the insurance requirements have been met or that the insurance policies shown on the Certificates of Insurance are in compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. 9.3. No work shall commence unless and until the required Certificates of Insurance are received and the written Notice to Proceed is issued to the CONSULTANT by the OWNER. 9.4. Promptly after written Notice of Award is issued by the OWNER and prior to approving any work CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain-insurance of the types and to the limits specified in Schedule B entitled "Insurance Coverage", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. CONSULTANT shall require each of its subconsultants and subcontractors to procure and maintain, until the completion of that subconsultant's or subcontractor's work, insurance of the types and to the limits specified in Schedule B, unless such insurance requirement for the subconsultant or subcontractor is expressly waived in writing by the OWNER. Said waiver shall not be unreasonably withheld upon CONSULTANT representing in writing to OWNER that CONSULTANT's existing coverage includes and covers the subconsultants and subcontractors for which a waiver is sought, and that such coverage is in conformance with the types and limits of insurance specified in Schedule B. All liability insurance policies, other than the Professional Liability, Worker's Compensation and Employers' Liability policies, obtained by CONSULTANT to meet the requirements of this Agreement shall name OWNER as an additional insured as to the operations of the CONSULTANT under this Agreement and the Contract Documents and shall contain severability of interests provisions. 9.5. If any insurance provided pursuant to this Agreement expires prior to the completion and final acceptance by Owner of any works, performed hereunder, renewal Certificates of -14- Insurance and, if requested by Owner, certified, true copies of the renewal policies shall be furnished by CONSULTANT thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration. 9.6. Should at any time the CONSULTANT not maintain the insurance coverages required in this Agreement, the OWNER may cancel this Agreement or at its sole discretion shall be authorized to purchase such coverages and charge the CONSULTANT for such coverages purchased. The OWNER shall be under no obligation to purchase such insurance, nor shall it be responsible for the coverages purchased or the insurance company or companies used. The decision of the OWNER to purchase such insurance coverages shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of its rights under this Agreement. ARTICLE TEN SERVICES BY CONSULTANT'S OWN STAFF 10.1. The services to be performed hereunder shall be performed by CONSULTANT's own staff, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the OWNER. The employment of, contract with, or use of the services of any other person or firm by CONSULTANT, as independent consultant or otherwise, shall be subject to the prior written approval of the OWNER. No provision of this Agreement shall, however, be construed as constituting an agreement between the OWNER and any such other person or firm. Nor shall anything in this Agreement be deemed to give any such party or any third party any claim or right of action against the OWNER beyond such as may otherwise exist without regard to this Agreement. ARTICLE ELEVEN WAIVER OF CLAIMS 11.1. CONSULTANT's acceptance of final payment under any Work Order shall constitute a full waiver of any and all claims, except for insurance company subrogation claims, by it against OWNER arising out of this Agreement or otherwise related to the work, except those previously made in writing and identified by CONSULTANT as unsettled at the time of the final payment. -]5- !6El Neither the acceptance of CONSULTANT's services nor payment by OWNER shall be deemed to be a waiver of any of OWNER's rights against CONSULTANT. ARTICLE TWELVE TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 12.1. CONSULTANT shall be considered in material default of this Agreement and such default will be considered cause for OWNER to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, as further set forth in this section, for any of the following reasons: (a) failure to begin work under the Agreement within the times specified under the Notice(s) to Proceed, or (b) failure to properly and timely perform the services to be provided hereunder or as directed by OWNER, or (c) the bankruptcy or insolvency or a general assignment for the benefit of creditors by CONSULTANT or by any of CONSULTANT's principals, officers or directors, or (d) failure to obey laws, ordinances, regulations or other codes of conduct, or (e) failure to perform or abide by the terms or spirit of this Agreement, or (f) for any other just cause. The OWNER may so terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, by giving the CONSULTANT seven (7) calendar day~ written notice of the material default. 12.2. If, after notice of termination of this Agreement as provided for in paragraph 12.1 above, it is determined for any reason that CONSULTANT was not in default, or that its default was excusable, or that OWNER otherwise was not entitled to the remedy against CONSULTANT provided for in paragraph 12.1, then the notice of termination given pursuant to paragraph 12.1 shall be deemed to be the notice of termination provided for in paragraph 12.3 below and CONSULTANT's remedies against OWNER shall be the same as and limited to those afforded CONSULTANT under paragraph 12.3 below. 12.3. OWNER shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, without cause upon seven (7) calendar days written notice to CONSULTANT. In the event of such termination for convenience, CONSULTANT's recovery against OWNER shall be limited to that -16- 16E1 portion of the fee earned through the date of termination, together with any retainage withheld and any costs reasonably incurred by CONSULTANT that are directly attributable to the termination, but CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to any other or further recovery against OWNER, including, but not limited to, anticipated fees or profits on work not required to be performed. CONSULTANT must mitigate all such costs to the greatest extent reasonably possible. 12.4. Upon termination, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the OWNER all original papers, records, documents, drawings, models, and other material set forth and described in this Agreement including Section 6.1. 12.5. The OWNER shall have the power to suspend all or any portions of the services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder upon giving CONSULTANT two (2) calendar days prior written notice of such suspension. If all or any portion of the services to be rendered hereunder are so suspended, the CONSULTANT's sole and exclusive remedy shall be to seek an extension of time to its schedule in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article Four herein. ARTICLE THIRTEEN TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION REPRESENTATIONS 13.1. CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement and that CONSULTANT has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. -]?- 13.2. In accordance with provisions of Section 287.055, (5)(a), Florida Statutes, the CONSULTANT agrees to execute the required Truth-In-Negotiation Certificate, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Schedule C, stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation are accurate, complete and current at the time of the Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the original Agreement price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the OWNER determines the Agreement price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such adjustments shall be made within one (1) year following the end of this Agreement. ARTICLE FOURTEEN CONFLICT OF INTEREST 14.1. CONSULTANT represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. ARTICLE FIFTEEN MODIFICATION 15.1. No modification or change in this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon either party unless in writing and executed by the party or parties intended to be bound by it. ARTICLE SIXTEEN NOTICES AND ADDRESS OF RECORD 16.1. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the CONSULTANT to the OWNER shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following OWNER's address of record: Board of County Commissioners, Collier County Florida Purchasing Department 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FI. 34112 Attention: Purchasing Director 16.2. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT shall be made in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by the United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following CONSULTANT's address of record: PBS&J 5300 W. Cypress Street Suite 300 Tampa, FL 33607 Attention: Mr. Gary Kleker, Associate VP, Program Manager 16.3. Either party may change its address of record by written notice to the other party given in accordance with requirements of this Article. ARTICLE SEVENTEEN MISCELLANEOUS 17.1. CONSULTANT, in representing OWNER, shall promote the best interest of OWNER and assume towards OWNER a duty of the highest trust, confidence, and fair dealing. 17.2. No modification, waiver, suspension or termination of the Agreement or of any terms thereof shall impair the rights or liabilities of either party. 17.3. This Agreement is not assignable, or otherwise transferable in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of OWNER. 17.4. Waiver by either party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement. -19- 17.5. The headings of the Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments as contained in this Agreement are for the purpose of convenience only and shall not be deemed to expand, limit or change the provisions in such Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments. 17.6. This Agreement, initially consisting of 26 continuously numbered pages including the referenced Schedules and Attachments hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and shall supersede, replace and nullify any and all prior agreements or understandings, written or oral, relating to the matter set forth herein, and any such prior agreements or understanding shall have no force or effect whatever on this Agreement. 17.7 COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS AGREEMENT. This Agreement consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the Agreement as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, RFP #02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services", Consultant's Fee Schedule "A", Insurance Coverage Schedule "B", Truth in Negotiation Schedule "C". ARTICLE EIGHTEEN APPLICABLE LAW 18.1. Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the laws, rules, and regulations of the State of Florida, and by such laws, rules and regulations of the United States as made applicable to when providing services funded by the United States government. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate Florida state court in Collier County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Professional Services Agreement for Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services the day and year first written above. -2.0- ATTEST: Dwight E. BroCk, Clerk Date: Approved as'to,'~m and 16£1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Jgrrf~es N. Coletta, Chairman PBS&J Witnessed: BECKY S. (Typ~ name): ,,~..,-~,~,-,,J.- L. (CORPORATE SEAL) By: ' (Type name): RICHARDA:'WICKETT (Title): Chairman of the Board -21- SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE A Collier County Standard Fee Schedule RFP 02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services" Professional Credentials Principal P.E. $150.00/hr Project Manager P.E. $100.00/hr Senior Planner/Engineer A.T.C.P. or P.E. $100.00/hr Planner/Engineer A.I.C.P. or P.E. $90.00/hr Senior Technician $55.00/hr Technician $45.00/hr Support Administrative Assistant, Secretary $45.00/hr Clerical, other support $35.00/hr This list is not intended to be all-inclusive. The County and firm on a project-by-project basis as needed shall mutually negotiate hourly rate fees for other categories of professional, support and other services. END OF SCHEDULE A -22 - SCHEDULE B INSURANCE COVERAGE 16£1 (1) The amounts and types of insurance coverage shall conform to the following minimum requirements with the use of Insurance Services Office (ISO) forms and endorsements or their equivalents. WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Insurance shall be maintained by the ContractodConsultant/Professional during the term of this Agreement for all employees engaged in the work under this Agreement in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The amounts of such insurance shall not be less than: a. Worker's Compensation - Florida Statutory Requirements b. Employers' Liability (check one) X $100,000 Each Accident $500,000 Disease Aggregate $100,000 Disease Each Employee (2) The insurance company shall waive its Rights of Subrogation against the Owner and the policy shall be so endorsed. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Insurance shall be maintained by the ContractodConsultant/Professional. Coverage will include, but not be limited to, Bodily Injury, Property Damage, Personal Injury, Contractual Liability for this Agreement, Independent Contractors, Broad Form Property Damage including Completed Operations and Products and Completed Operations Coverage. Products and Completed Operations coverage shall be maintained for a period of not less than five (5) years following the completion and acceptance -23- by the Owner of the work under this Agreement. following: (check one) X General Aggregate Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Personal and Advertising Injury Each Occurrence Fire Damage Limits of Liability shall not be less than the $1,000,000 SI,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $ 50,000 (2) The General Aggregate Limit shall apply separately to this Project and the policy shall be endorsed using the following endorsement wording. "This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: Commercial General Liability Coverage Part. The General Aggregate Limit under LIMITS OF INSURANCE applies separately to each of your projects away from premises owned by or rented to you." (3) If the General Liability insurance required herein is issued or renewed on a "claims made" basis, as opposed to the "occurrence" form, the retroactive date for coverage shall be no later than the commencement date of the Project and shall provide that in the event of cancellation or non-renewal the Extended Reporting Period (Discovery Period) for claims shall be no less than three (3) years. (4) The Owner shall be named as an Additional Insured and the policy shall be endorsed that such coverage shall be primary to any similar coverage carried by the Owner. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE shall be maintained by the Contractor / Consultant / Professional for the ownership, maintenance or use of any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle with limits of not less than: (check one) X Bodily Injury & Property Damage - $ 500,000 PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE shall be maintained by the Consultant/Professional to insure its legal liability for claims arising out of the performance of professional services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall have limits of not less than X $1,000,000 each claim and in the aggregate -24- (2) Any deductible applicable to any claim shall be the sole Consultant/Professional and shall not be greater than $50,000 each claim. lt£1 responsibility of the (3) The Consultant/Professional shall continue this coverage for this Project for a period of not less than five (5) years following completion and acceptance of the project by the Owner. END OF SCHEDULE B. -25- ........................................................... -..-.,., .....v.v.v,v..,v .. ............................................ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND Collinswo rth, Alter, Nielson,CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. TH/S CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW Fowler & Dowling,lnc.(WMC/DIA) COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE 5979 NW 151 Street, Suite 105 COMPANY Miami Lakes, FL 33014 LETTER A Continental Casualty Co A XV COMPANY INSURED LETTER B Nat'l Union Fire Ins Co/AIG A+ +XV COMPANY Post, Buckley, Schuh & LETTER C American Cas Co of Reading PA AXV Jernigan, Inc. d/b/a PBS&J COMPANY 2001 NW 107 Avenue LETTER . I) Lloyds of London A- XV Miami FL 33172 COMPANY LETTER E !~i~iiiiiiii!i!i%i!%iiiiiiiiiiiiii!!!i!iiiiiii!!!! ii!iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!i!!!iiiiiiiii::::::i::i::i!!!!!iiiiiiiiiii iii::iii!!::i::i:=iii!i::iii::iii::i::i::!::?: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::~ ??~ ~i :~i ii:/:i ::i~ ~:~:iii ~:i ~:i::i::!:: ii ://: ii:: i~i~::~?:~i~::~i~::~?:~i~???:~ ................................................................. · ..,...,..,.,..,.,,...v......, : =================================================: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR TH~ POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTH~ICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY TH~ POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ICC TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF. POLICY EXP. hTR DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY) LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY GL247843206 9/30/02 9/30/03 GENERAL AGGREGATE 2000000 X CUM3/. GENERAL LIABILITY PROD-COMP/UP AGG. 2000000 i?~i!i!i:~!ii' I CLAIMS M,nE I--~--IOCC. mRS. ~ ~v. INru~y 1 oooooo OWNER'S & CONTRACT'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE 1000000 ~; Per Project Aqq ~ DAMAGE(One FL'e) 1000000 MED. EXP. (One Per) 25000 A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BUA247843223 9/30/02 9/30/03 COMBINED SINGLE 1000000 X ANY AUTO LIMIT X ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) X HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY X NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE B EXCESS LIABILITY BE2131608 9/30/02 9/30/03 EACH OCCURIU~NCE 10000000 X UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE 10000000 OTHER T~N ~HELLA FOR~ C WC247843268 9/30/02 9/30/03 X J STAXUTORY LIMITS WORKERS' COMPENSATION EACH ACCWENT 1000000 DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT 1000000 EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY DISEASE-EACH EMP, 1000000 D OTHER P42302 9/30/02 9/30/03 Professional / $1,000,000 Limits Pollution Liab ea claim/aggregate Claims-Made Form 1/11/61 retrodate DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEmCLES/SPECIAL ITEMS RE: Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services. SEE ATTACHED ........... . ..................................................... ======================== ...... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ii::iSHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE ilii EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO Collier County Government ii!i~~AIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO TIm CERTI~CATE HOLDER NAMED TO Tim iii[ LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR Administrative Services Div. :.:.:LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. 3301E TamiamiTrail i?iiii ~[F//,~' // ~! / Na les FL 34112 i!iii AUTHORIZED RE~ATI~ // ,F/ I .~ ,, P , ::ii::::i//,/,/'//j/',~'~ //?'_ ~ ~j~'~r" ~ L,2.~ ~J 6 ......................... :':':':':':':'' :':-.-:' :-:'.' :':':' .': ':' .-. ':':':-:-:' :-:-:': ':':-:':':' :' :': ';-: ':-:':-:':-:' :':':':':' :-: ::: :::::::: :: ::::::::': ':':-:-: ':' :':':':-:' :': ':': ':; :;: ;:;:;:;:;:: :; :;::: ;:;:;: ;:;: ;::: ~:: ;~ ~ :i: T:i:i:i:i:! :i:!:i: i:i:i:i: i:i:i? :i: i¢ !:~:!:i:~: ~:]:~:i :::: :::: :~: ~: [:; ? 7; i:i:~M: ~:i :~:~:~:iiii:ill ii'il i~?! i?iiiiif~ ii iiiiiiiii!! ~!~??i ~! ~ii iii~iii[~!~!: i~!~iiiiii!ili!i!i!~i~!~ ?:-~!ii~!i! ii NAMED INSURED: Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. d/b/a PBS&J CERTIFICATE HOLDER: Collier County Government RE: Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Svcs Certificate Holder is named additional insured on the general liability, excluding professional services. Worker's Compensation & Employer's Liability endorsed to include a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of Certificate Holder. Issuing companies will provide 30 days written notice of cancellation, non-renewal and/or material reduction of coverage/limits. SCHEDULE C TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE In compliance with the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act, Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, PBS&J hereby certifies that wages, rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation for the Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services of the CONSULTANT to be provided under the Professional Services Agreement are accurate, complete and current as of the time of contracting. DATE: -26- Contract # 02-3371 AGREEMENT FOR FIXED TERM PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ,/~ day of ,/~//E-/~/2~/,'~ , 2002, by and between the Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and (hereinafter referred to as the "OWNER") and CH2M Hill, Inc., a Florida Corporation, authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 4350 West Cypress Street #600, Tampa, FL 33607 (hereinafter referred to as the "CONSULTANT"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the OWNER desires to obtain Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services of the CONSULTANT concerning work and/or the improvement of areas within the operational jurisdiction of Collier County, such services to be performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement and with Work Orders to be issued by OWNER subsequent to execution of this Agreement; and in accordance with the conditions that each Work Order shall not exceed $90,000 and that total initial compensation for all Work Orders issued under this Agreement shall not exceed $500,000. WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT has submitted a proposal for provision of those services; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be required by the OWNER. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and provisions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE CONSULTANT'S RESPONSIBILITY 1.1. CONSULTANT shall provide to OWNER Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services in all phases of any Work Order to which this Agreement applies. 1.2. The Basic Services to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder are those set forth in this Agreement and Work Orders prepared and issued by the OWNER and executed by the parties hereto subsequent and pursuant to execution of the Agreement. The total compensation to be paid CONSULTANT by the OWNER for all Basic Services is set forth in Article Five and Schedule A, "Consultant's Employee Hourly Rate Schedule", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. 1.3. The CONSULTANT agrees to obtain and maintain throughout the period of this Agreement all such licenses as are required to do business in the State of Florida and in Collier County, Florida, including, but not limited to, all licenses required by the respective state boards and other governmental agencies responsible for regulating and licensing the professional services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement. 1.4. The CONSULTANT agrees that, when the services to be provided hereunder relate to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization or other form of legal entitlement to practice such services, it shall employ and/or retain only qualified personnel to provide such services. 1.5. CONSULTANT agrees to employ and designate a Work Manager in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving its Notice to Proceed under an executed Work Order. The Work Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of the CONSULTANT with respect to directing, coordinating and administering all aspects of the services to be provided 2 and performed under this Agreement and a Work Order. Within five (5) calendar days from the Notice to Proceed issued by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the OWNER a written statement, executed by the proper officers of the CONSULTANT, acknowledging that the Work Manager under the Work Order shall have full authority to bind and obligate the CONSULTANT on all matters arising out of or relating to such Work Order and this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the Work Manager shall devote whatever time is required to satisfactorily manage the services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder. The person selected by the CONSULTANT to serve as the Work Manager shall be subject to the prior approval and acceptance of the OWNER. 1.6. CONSULTANT agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of a written request from the OWNER, to promptly remove and replace the Work Manager, or any other personnel employed or retained by the CONSULTANT, or any subconsultants or subcontractors or any personnel of any such subconsultants or subcontractors engaged by the CONSULTANT to provide and perform services or work pursuant to the requirements of this Agreement, whom the OWNER shall request in writing to be removed, which request may be made by the OWNER with or without stating its cause to CONSULTANT. 1.7. The CONSULTANT has represented to the OWNER that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be performed pursuant to this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that all services to be provided by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the OWNER's review and approval and shall be in accordance with the generally accepted standards of professional practice in the State of Florida, as well as in accordance with all published laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations and requirements of any governmental agencies which regulate or have jurisdiction over the Project or the services to be provided and performed by CONSULTANT hereunder. In the event of any conflicts in these -3- 16£1 requirements, the CONSULTANT shall notify the OWNER of such conflict and utilize its best professional judgment to advise OWNER regarding resolution of each such conflict. 1.8. CONSULTANT agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third person, firm or organization, without OWNER's prior written consent, or unless incident to the proper performance of the CONSULTANT's obligations hereunder, or in the course of judicial or legislative proceedings where such information has been properly subpoenaed, any non-public information concerning the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder, and CONSULTANT shall require all of its employees, agents, subconsultants and subcontractors to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. 1.9. If required pursuant to a Work Order, CONSULTANT agrees to provide to OWNER professional evaluations of the OWNER'S work budget. The evaluations and opinions shall be delivered to OWNER in accordance with the following schedule: (a) The professional evaluations of the OWNER's work budget shall be delivered with the report to be furnished by CONSULTANT as part of the Scope of Services. 1.10. Evaluations of the OWNER'S budget, prepared by the CONSULTANT represent the CONSULTANT'S best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional Traffic Engineering consultant. ARTICLE TWO ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANT If authorized in writing by OWNER, CONSULTANT shall furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed in Article Two herein. These services will be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Article Five and Schedule A. The following services shall be Additional Basic Services: -4- 2.1. Preparation of applications and supporting documents (except those already'to be furnished under this Agreement) for private or governmental grants, loans, bond issues or advances. 2.2. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, OWNER's schedule or character of construction; and revising previously accepted studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents previously accepted by OWNER when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent to and not reasonably anticipated prior to the preparation of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond CONSULTANT's control. 2.3 Preparation and submission of information to and necessary consultations with the Collier County Transportation Department, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Transportation, South Florida Water Management District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or other appropriate regulatory agencies, in order to obtain necessary permits or approvals for construction of the Project. 2.4 Providing renderings or models for OWNER's use. 2.5. Investigations and studies involving detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; the preparation of feasibility studies, cash flow and economic evaluations, rate schedules and appraisals; and evaluating processes available for licensing and assisting OWNER in obtaining process licensing. 2.6. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other than the contract services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder. -5- 2.7, 16£1 Services during out-of-town travel required of CONSULTANT and directed by OWNER, other than visits to the Project site or OWNER's office or local travel as defined herein. 2.8. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for construction, materials, equipment or services, except as otherwise provided for herein. 2.9. Providing any type of property surveys, aerial photography or related services needed for the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys for design purposes and engineering surveys and staking to enable contractors to proceed with their work and providing other special field surveys. 2.10. Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals, except as otherwise provided for herein. 2.1 1. Preparing to serve or serving as a CONSULTANT or witness for OWNER in any litigation, or other legal or administrative proceeding, involving the work (except for assistance in consultations which are included as part of the Basic Services to be provided herein). 2.12. Additional services rendered by CONSULTANTS not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in Collier County in accordance with generally accepted practice. ARTICLE THREE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1. The OWNER shall designate in writing a work coordinator to act as OWNER's representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement and a particular Work Order (hereinafter referred to as the "Work Coordinator"). The Work Coordinator shall have authority -6- 16£1 to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER's policies and decisions with respect to CONSULTANT's services for the work. However, the Work Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to the CONSULTANT that would have the effect, or be interpreted to have the effect, of modifying or changing in any way whatever: (a) The scope of services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder; (b) The time the CONSULTANT is obligated to commence and complete all such services; or (c) The amount of compensation the OWNER is obligated or committed to pay the CONSULTANT. 3.2. The Work Coordinator shall: (a) Review and make appropriate recommendations on all requests submitted by the CONSULTANT for payment for services and work provided and performed in accordance with this Agreement; (b) Provide all criteria and information requested by CONSULTANT as to OWNER's requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; (c) Upon request from CONSULTANT, assist CONSULTANT by placing at CONSULTANT's disposal all available information in the OWNER'S possession pertinent to the Project, including existing drawings, specifications, shop drawings, product literature, previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project (d) Arrange for access to and make all provisions for CONSULTANT to enter the site to perform the services to be provided by CONSULTANT under this Agreement; and _?_ (e) Provide notice to CONSULTANT of any deficiencies or defects discovered by the OWNER with respect to the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder. 3.3. CONSULTANT acknowledges that access to any work site, to be arranged by OWNER for CONSULTANT, may be provided during times that are not the normal business hours of the CONSULTANT. 3.4. OWNER shall be responsible for the acquisition of all easements, property sites, rights-of-way, or other property rights required for the work and for the costs thereof, including the costs of any required land surveys in connection with such acquisition. ARTICLE FOUR TIME 4.1. The period of service shall be from the date of execution of this Agreement through two (2) years from that date, or until such time as all outstanding Work Orders issued prior to the expiration of the Agreement period have been completed. This Agreement may be renewed for an additional two (2) years, renewable annually. Renewal shall be agreed to, in writing, by both parties. 4.2. Services to be rendered by CONSULTANT shall be commenced subsequent to the execution of this Agreement upon written Notice to Proceed from OWNER for all or any designated portion of the project established by a Work Order and shall be performed and completed in accordance with such Work Order. Time is of the essence with respect to the performance of this Agreement. 4.3 Should CONSULTANT be obstructed or delayed in the prosecution or completion of its services as a result of unforeseeable causes beyond the control of CONSULTANT, and not due to its own fault or neglect, including but not restricted to acts of nature or of public enemy, acts of government or of the OWNER, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine regulations, strikes or -8- lock-outs, then CONSULTANT shall notify OWNER in writing within five (5) working days after commencement of such delay, stating the cause or causes thereof, or be deemed to have waived any right which CONSULTANT may have had to request a time extension. 4.4. No interruption, interference, inefficiency, suspension or delay in the commencement or progress of CONSULTANT's services from any cause whatsoever, including those for which OWNER may be responsible in whole or in part, shall relieve CONSULTANT of its duty to perform or give rise to any right to damages or additional compensation from OWNER. CONSULTANT's sole remedy against OWNER will be the right to seek an extension of time to its schedule. This paragraph shall expressly apply to claims for early completion, as well as claims based on late completion. Provided, however, if through no fault or neglect of the CONSULTANT, the services to be provided hereunder by CONSULTANT have not been completed within two (2) calendar years of a Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT's compensation may be equitably adjusted, with respect to those services that have not yet been performed, to reflect the incremental increase in costs experienced by CONSULTANT after expiration of the two year period, plus all time extensions granted by OWNER to CONSULTANT. 4.5. Should the CONSULTANT fail to commence, provide, perform or complete any of the services to be provided hereunder in a timely and reasonable manner, in addition to any other rights or remedies available to the OWNER hereunder, the OWNER at its sole discretion and option may withhold any and all payments due and owing to the CONSULTANT until such time as the CONSULTANT resumes performance of its obligations hereunder in such a manner so as to reasonably establish to the OWNER's satisfaction that the CONSULTANT's performance is or will shortly be back on schedule. -9- ARTICLE FIVE COMPENSATION 16£1 5.1. The COUNTY will compensate the CONSULTANT for the services performed on each Work Order in accordance with a negotiated lump sum, cost plus fixed fee, or established hourly rate as provided in Schedule A attached hereto. 5.2. Subcontractual services, if any, shall be invoiced by the CONSULTANT at the actual fees paid by the CONSULTANT. 5.3. Reimbursable expenses shall be invoiced for the expenditures incurred by the CONSULTANT as follows: 5.3.1. Expenses of transportation and living when traveling in connection with each Work Order, except for local travel within Collier or Lee Counties, as provided in Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, and fees paid for securing approval of authorities have jurisdiction over the Work Order. 5.3.2. Expenses of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings and Specifications including duplicate sets at the completion of each Work Order for the County's review and approval. 5.3.3. Expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, when authorized by the County. 5.3.4. Expense of models for the County's use. 5.4. Total compensation for all services and expenses shall not exceed the limit listed upon each Work Order without written approval. -10- 5,5. Total initial compensation for all services and expenses shall not exceed $90,000 per Work Order and total contract limit shall not exceed $500,000. 5.6. Payments for Basic Services, Additional Basic Services, Subcontractual Services, and Reimbursable Expenses as defined in Section V, shall be made upon presentation of the CONSULTANT's County-approved itemized invoice. 5.7. Records of Reimbursable Expenses and Expenses pertaining to Additional Basic Services on the Work Order shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis and shall be available and provided to the County with submittal of invoices. ARTICLE SIX OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 6.1. Upon completion or termination of this Agreement, all records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer assisted design or drafting disks and other technical data, prepared or developed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall be delivered to and become the property of OWNER. This does not apply to working papers. Said records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer disks and other technical data prepared by the CONSULTANT for each project under this Agreement are considered to be instruments of the CONSULTANT'S service. CONSULTANT, at its own expense, may retain copies for its files and internal use. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold harmless CONSULTANT with respect to any claim brought by any third party against CONSULTANT, including loss or damage from the claim including attorneys fees incurred by CONSULTANT, which claim arises out of OWNER's use of said records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer disks and other technical data on some other project unless such use is authorized by CONSULTANT. -11- 6.2. With respect to and in consideration for the indemnification provided by OWNER in paragraphs 6.1. above, CONSULTANT has paid to OWNER $10.00, the sufficiency and receipt of which is acknowledged by OWNER through the signing of this Agreement. ARTICLE SEVEN MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS 7.1. CONSULTANT will keep adequate records and supporting documentation which concern or reflect its services hereunder. The records and documentation will be retained by CONSULTANT for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of termination of this Agreement or the date the work is completed, whichever is later. OWNER, or any duly authorized agents or representatives of OWNER, shall, free of charge, have the right to audit, inspect and copy all such records and documentation as often as they deem necessary during the period of this Agreement and during the five (5) year period noted above; provided, however, such activity shall be conducted only during normal business hours. ARTICLE EIGHT INDEMNIFICATION 8.1. The CONSULTANT in consideration of $100.00, the sufficiency and receipt of which is acknowledged through the signing of this Agreement shall indemnify and hold OWNER and its officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney fees to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentional wrongful conduct of the CONSULTANT, its Subconsultants, Subcontractors, agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement or work performed thereunder. The CONSULTANT'S obligation under this paragraph shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Agreement or the CONSULTANT'S limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. 8.2. CONSULTANT acknowledges that the general conditions of any construction contract that CONSULTANT creates in performance of a Work Order shall include language, satisfactory to -12- 16£1 the OWNER's attorney, in which the contractor agrees to hold harmless and to defend OWNER, its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorney's fees, and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of the construction contract or work performed thereunder. ARTICLE NINE INSURANCE 9.1. During the life of the Agreement (and until final acceptance by Owner for work performed under any Work Order issued by Owner) the CONSULTANT shall provide, pay for, and maintain, with companies satisfactory to the OWNER, the type and amounts of insurance described herein and on Exhibit B. All insurance shall be from responsible companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida and/or responsible risk retention group insurance companies registered with the State of Florida. Promptly after written Notice of Award is issued by the OWNER, the insurance coverages and limits required must be evidenced by properly executed Certificates of Insurance on forms which are acceptable to the OWNER. The Certificates must be personally, manually signed by the Authorized Representatives of the insurance company/companies shown on the Certificate with proof that he/she is an authorized representative thereof. In addition, certified, true and exact copies of all insurance policies required shall be provided to the OWNER, on a timely basis, if required by the OWNER. These Certificates and policies shall contain provisions that thirty (30) days written notice by registered or certified mail shall be given to the OWNER of any cancellation, intent not to renew, or reduction in the policies' coverages, except in the application of the Aggregate Limits Provisions. In the event of a reduction in the Aggregate Limits of any policy, the CONSULTANT shall immediately take steps to have the Aggregate Limit reinstated to the full extent permitted under such policy. All insurance coverages of the CONSULTANT shall be primary to any insurance or self-insurance program carried by the OWNER applicable to the Work. -13- 9.2. The acceptance by the OWNER of any Certificate of Insurance evidenci insurance coverages and limits required in this Agreement does not constitute approval or agreement by the OWNER that the insurance requirements have been met or that the insurance policies shown on the Certificates of Insurance are in compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. 9.3. No work shall commence unless and until the required Certificates of Insurance are received and the written Notice to Proceed is issued to the CONSULTANT by the OWNER. 9.4. Promptly after written Notice of Award is issued by the OWNER and prior to approving any work CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain insurance of the types and to the limits specified in Schedule B entitled "Insurance Coverage", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. CONSULTANT shall require each of its subconsultants and subcontractors to procure and maintain, until the completion of that subconsultant's or subcontractor's work, insurance of the types and to the limits specified in Schedule B, unless such insurance requirement for the subconsultant or subcontractor is expressly waived in writing by the OWNER. Said waiver shall not be unreasonably withheld upon CONSULTANT representing in writing to OWNER that CONSULTANT's existing coverage includes and covers the subconsultants and subcontractors for which a waiver is sought, and that such coverage is in conformance with the types and limits of insurance specified in Schedule B. All liability insurance policies, other than the Professional Liability, Worker's Compensation and Employers' Liability policies, obtained by CONSULTANT to meet the requirements of this Agreement shall name OWNER as an additional insured as to the operations of the CONSULTANT under this Agreement and the Contract Documents and shall contain severability of interests provisions. 9.5. If any insurance provided pursuant to this Agreement expires prior to the completion and final acceptance by Owner of any works, performed hereunder, renewal Certificates of -14- Insurance and, if requested by Owner, certified, true copies of the renewal policies shall be furnished by CONSULTANT thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration. 9.6. Should at any time the CONSULTANT not maintain the insurance coverages required in this Agreement, the OWNER may cancel this Agreement or at its sole discretion shall be authorized to purchase such coverages and charge the CONSULTANT for such coverages purchased. The OWNER shall be under no obligation to purchase such insurance, nor shall it be responsible for the coverages purchased or the insurance company or companies used. The decision of the OWNER to purchase such insurance coverages shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of its rights under this Agreement. ARTICLE TEN SERVICES BY CONSULTANT'S OWN STAFF 10.1. The services to be performed hereunder shall be performed by CONSULTANT's own staff, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the OWNER. The employment of, contract with, or use of the services of any other person or firm by CONSULTANT, as independent consultant or otherwise, shall be subject to the prior written approval of the OWNER. No provision of thi~ Agreement shall, however, be construed as constituting an agreement between the OWNER and any such other person or firm. Nor shall anything in this Agreement be deemed to give any such party or any third party any claim or right of action against the OWNER beyond such as may otherwise exist without regard to this Agreement. ARTICLE ELEVEN WAIVER OF CLAIMS 11.1. CONSULTANT's acceptance of final payment under any Work Order shall constitute a full waiver of any and all claims, except for insurance company subrogation claims, by it against OWNER arising out of this Agreement or otherwise related to the work, except those previously made in writing and identified by CONSULTANT as unsettled at the time of the final payment. -15- Neither the acceptance of CONSULTANT's services nor payment by OWNER shall be deemed to be a waiver of any of OWNER's rights against CONSULTANT. ARTICLE TVVELVE TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 12.1. CONSULTANT shall be considered in material default of this Agreement and such default will be considered cause for OWNER to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, as further set forth in this section, for any of the following reasons: (a) failure to begin work under the Agreement within the times specified under the Notice(s) to Proceed, or (b) failure to properly and timely perform the services to be provided hereunder or as directed by OWNER, or (c) the bankruptcy or insolvency or a general assignment for the benefit of creditors by CONSULTANT or by any of CONSULTANT's principals, officers or directors, or (d) failure to obey laws, ordinances, regulations or other codes of conduct, or (e) failure to perform or abide by the terms or spirit of this Agreement, or (f) for any other just cause. The OWNER may so terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, by giving the CONSULTANT seven (7) calendar day~ written notice of the material default. 12.2. If, after notice of termination of this Agreement as provided for in paragraph 12.1 above, it is determined for any reason that CONSULTANT was not in default, or that its default was excusable, or that OWNER otherwise was not entitled to the remedy against CONSULTANT provided for in paragraph 12.1, then the notice of termination given pursuant to paragraph 12.1 shall be deemed to be the notice of termination provided for in paragraph 12.3 below and CONSULTANT's remedies against OWNER shall be the same as and limited to those afforded CONSULTANT under paragraph 12.3 below. 12.3. OWNER shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, without cause upon seven (7) calendar days written notice to CONSULTANT. In the event of such termination for convenience, CONSULTANT's recovery against OWNER shall be limited to that -].6- portion of the fee earned through the date of termination, together with any retainage withheld and any costs reasonably incurred by CONSULTANT that are directly attributable to the termination, but CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to any other or further recovery against OWNER, including, but not limited to, anticipated fees or profits on work not required to be performed. CONSULTANT must mitigate all such costs to the greatest extent reasonably possible. 12.4. Upon termination, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the OWNER all original papers, records, documents, drawings, models, and other material set forth and described in this Agreement including Section 6.1. 12.5. The OWNER shall have the power to suspend all or any portions of the services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder upon giving CONSULTANT two (2) calendar days prior written notice of such suspension. If all or any portion of the services to be rendered hereunder are so suspended, the CONSULTANT's sole and exclusive remedy shall be to seek an extension of time to its schedule in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article Four herein. ARTICLE THIRTEEN TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION REPRESENTATIONS 13.1. CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement and that CONSULTANT has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. -17- 16£'1 13.2. In accordance with provisions of Section 287.055, (5)(a), Florida Statutes, the CONSULTANT agrees to execute the required Truth-In-Negotiation Certificate, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Schedule C, stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation are accurate, complete and current at the time of the Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the original Agreement price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the OWNER determines the Agreement price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such adjustments shall be made within one (1) year following the end of this Agreement. ARTICLE FOURTEEN CONFLICT OF INTEREST 14.1. CONSULTANT represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. ARTICLE FIFTEEN MODIFICATION 15.1. No modification or change in this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon either party unless in writing and executed by the party or parties intended to be bound by it. ARTICLE SIXTEEN NOTICES AND ADDRESS OF RECORD 16.1. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the CONSULTANT to the OWNER shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following OWNER's address of record: Board of County Commissioners, Collier County Florida Purchasing Department 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FI. 34112 Attention: Purchasing Director 16£1 16.2. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT shall be made in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by the United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following CONSULTANT's address of record: CH2M Hill, Inc. 4350 West Cypress Street #600 Tampa, FL 33607 Attention: Mr. John W. Mogge, Jr. 16.3. Either party may change its address of record by written notice to the other party given in accordance with requirements of this Article. ARTICLE SEVENTEEN MISCELLANEOUS 17.1. CONSULTANT, in representing OWNER, shall promote the best interest of OWNER and assume towards OWNER a duty of the highest trust, confidence, and fair dealing. 17.2. No modification, waiver, suspension or termination of the Agreement or of any terms thereof shall impair the rights or liabilities of either party. 17.3. This Agreement is not assignable, or otherwise transferable in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of OWNER. 17.4. Waiver by either party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement. -19- 17.5. The headings of the Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments as conl Agreement are for the purpose of convenience only and shall not be deemed to expand, limit or change the provisions in such Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments. 17.6. This Agreement, initially consisting of 26 continuously numbered pages including the referenced Schedules and Attachments hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and shall supersede, replace and nullify any and all prior agreements or understandings, written or oral, relating to the matter set forth herein, and any such prior agreements or understanding shall have no force or effect whatever on this Agreement. 17.7 COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS AGREEMENT. This Agreement consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the Agreement as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, RFP #02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services", Consultant's Fee Schedule "A", Insurance Coverage Schedule "B", Truth in Negotiation Schedule "C". ARTICLE EIGHTEEN APPLICABLE LAW 18.1. Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the laws, rules, and regulations of the State of Florida, and by such laws, rules and regulations of the United States as made applicable to when providing services funded by the United States government. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate Florida state court in Collier County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Professional Services Agreement for Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services the day and year first written above. -20- 16£I . ... , . ~?. , Dwight E. Brock, Clelr,k ApPr6~odasto form and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Ja(,d~s N. Coletta, Chairman CH2M Hill, Inc. Witnessed: By: (Type name): ¢,~$~ LLZ.- (Title): kC (Tyl;:~-name):,-] d ~ ,.r4~ CA (CORPORATE SEAL) -21- SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE A Collier County Standard Fee Schedule RFP 02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services" Professional Credentials Principal P.E. $150.00/hr Project Manager P.E. $100.00/hr Senior Planner/Engineer A.T.C.P. or P.E. $100.00/hr Planner/Engineer A.[.C.P. or P.E. $90.00/hr Senior Technician $55.00/hr Technician $45.00/hr Support Administrative Assistant, Secretary $45.00/hr Clerical, other support $35.00/hr 16£1 This list is not intended to be all-inclusive. The County and firm on a project-by-project basis as needed shall mutually negotiate hourly rate fees for other categories of professional, support and other services. END OF SCHEDULE A -22 - SCHEDULE B INSURANCE COVERAGE 16£1 (1) The amounts and types of insurance coverage shall conform to the following minimum requirements with the use of Insurance Services Office (ISO) forms and endorsements or their equivalents. WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Insurance shall be maintained by the ContractodConsultant/Professional during the term of this Agreement for all employees engaged in the work under this Agreement in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The amounts of such insurance shall not be less than: a. Worker's Compensation - Florida Statutory Requirements b. Employers' Liability (check one) X $100,000 Each Accident $500,000 Disease Aggregate $100,000 Disease Each Employee (2) The insurance company shall waive its Rights of Subrogation against the Owner and the policy shall be so endorsed. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Insurance shall be maintained by the Contractor/Consultant/Professional. Coverage will include, but not be limited to, Bodily Injury, Property Damage, Personal Injury, Contractual Liability for this Agreement, Independent Contractors, Broad Form Property Damage including Completed Operations and Products and Completed Operations Coverage. Products and Completed Operations coverage shall be maintained for a period of not less than five (5) years following the completion and acceptance -23- by the Owner of the work under this Agreement. following: (check one) X General Aggregate Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Personal and Advertising Injury Each Occurrence Fire Damage 16£1 Limits of Liability shall not be less than the $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $ 50,000 (2) The General Aggregate Limit shall apply separately to this Project and the policy shall be endorsed using the following endorsement wording. "This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: Commercial General Liability Coverage Part. The General Aggregate Limit under LIMITS OF INSURANCE applies separately to each of your projects away from premises owned by or rented to you." (3) If the General Liability insurance required herein is issued or renewed on a "claims made" basis, as opposed to the "occurrence" form, the retroactive date for coverage shall be no later than the commencement date of the Project and shall provide that in the event of cancellation or non-renewal the Extended Reporting Period (Discovery Period) for claims shall be no less than three (3) years. (4) The Owner shall be named as an Additional Insured and the policy shall be endorsed that such coverage shall be primary to any similar coverage carried by the Owner. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE shall be maintained by the Contractor / Consultant / Professional for the ownership, maintenance or use of any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle with limits of not less than: (check one) X Bodily Injury & Property Damage - $ 500,000 PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE shall be maintained by the Consultant/Professional to insure its legal liability for claims arising out of the performance of professional services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall have limits of not less than X $1,000,000 each claim and in the aggregate -24- (2) Any deductible applicable to any claim shall be the sole Consultant/Professional and shall not be greater than $50,000 each claim. ~ 0 ~'~ t]~e responsibility (3) The Consultant/Professional shall continue this coverage for this Project for a period of not less than five (5) years following completion and acceptance of the Project by the Owner. END OFSCHEDULEB. -25- '~'-; ....... ' ........ ' ' THIS CERTIFICATE 18 18SUE0 A8 A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS PRODUCER NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER OTHER THAN THOSE PROVIDEO IN THE MARSH USA, iNC. 1225 1TrH STREET, SUITE 2100 poLIcY. TNIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVER&GE DENV~ CO 80202-5534 AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE 15114 -00t 24-ALL-2000 'l'PA 812293 A ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY . , INSURED COMPANY CH2M HILL, INC. B 4350 WEST CYPRESS STREET, SUITE 600 COMPANY TAMPA, FL 33607 C COMPANY D TH~ IE TO CERTIFY THAT POUCIE~, OF IH~URANCE DESCR)BED HERE)N HAW BEEN )S,~UED TO 1~4E INSURED N/~MED HEREIN FOR ~tE POtJCY PERK)D INDICATED. NO'~HSTANDING ANY REQklIR~MENT, TERM OR CONOmON OF ANY OONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT Wil~ REEPEC, T TO WHICH THE. CERTIFICATE MAY BE I~U~=D OR MAY pERTNN. THB INff4JRA~ICE AFFOI~ED BY THE FOLICIE~ DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, CONDITIONS NCO EXCLUSIONS OF 5UOH POUCIE6, AGGREGATE POLICYEFFEGTIYE POLICY EXPIR&TIOI UNITE CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE (MMIDD/~ DATE (MMIODPi~'Y) GENEI~U. UABILIT~ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 A ~- Oo~aEnc~.~,u.U,mlt-~'Y iGLO8378563-07 05/01/02 05/01/03 p;K~OUCTS-OO~P~:~PAGG $ O.UUU,00U ~ "-'1 ~ PERSO~u- & ~ nuu~ iS 750.000 / OWNFI~'~ & CI:)1~$1-- I PFIIDT GACH OGCURRF-NOE $ 750,000 IqRE OAMAC~ {~ny ~ r~} $ 750.000 A AUTOMOBILE LiABILiTY COMBINED SINGLE UMIT $ X aNyAm'O BAP8378516'07 (AO$) 05/01/02 05/01/03 .. ~ OwnED ~'TOS TAP9378560'4)7 (TX) 05J01102 0~0'~/03 BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED ,MJTOS BAP8378561-07 {VA) 05/01/02 05/01103 O~r H~IE= Au'roE MA8378562-07 (MA) 05/01/02 05/01103 aOOiLY INJURY $ NON-OWNED AUTO~ pRQPER'TY DFLMAGE OAIM, GE LbkEiUTY AUTO ONLY - E~ ACCIDF-NT ,aNY AUTQ EXCESS I..I&EILIT~ ' , BACH OCCURRENCE $ S OTt'I~R THAN L-'~}-~--=i I & FORM WORKERGOOILIpENSATION'AND X I VW;STATU- 1 ] ~_~ ENP,OYERS' LIAaIUTY $ 1,000,000 A WC~37~ 05/01/02 05/01103 ;, eac~ nCCi~NT A THE pROPRIETORI [~ ireD. WC~378565-07 05/01/02 05/01/03 ;. DISEASE-POUCY UMIT $ 1,00O,000 pAR~;~.~cunw GL OiS~n.~--F.~.H ~MPLOYB~ $ t ,000,000 OTHER ~S(~RIPTION OF OPER&TION,~/I. OGATIONE/VEHICLEei''~'eCIAL ;; RE; FIXED-TERM PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES; PM: BILL GRAMER. 9HOULD ,aNY OF THE POLIC&'E5 DEIiCI,'I/~ED HERE~ ~ CAI~LD~J_I_LD') BEFORE THE EXP~TION O~TE ~ ",lit DAYa ~ NO'rlC~ TO ~ THE INaURER AFFOR~I~ COlOr. RAni; WI~. eI~DF.~VOR TO MAIL -- COLLIER COUNTY (FL) cr;m~-a~TE ~ ~ ~F.~.~, ~UI' ~:,~,.U~S TO ~,~. SUC~ ~O*nC£ ,~U. ~V,~O~ NO OSCO'nON O~ NAPLES, FL 34112-3969 ISSUER OF THIS MARSH USA INC. BY: Dorothy A. Stevens OCT-iS 88 1~:89 FROM:CHSM HILL 81~8743056 T0:941738084z ,~ PAGE:08 ~RODU~ER T~I8 ~ERTI~I~AT~ 15 I~U~D ~ A MA~R O~ INFO~&~OM ONLY AND ~SH USA, INC. NO RIGHT& UPOM THE C~RTIFiGATE flOLU~R OTHER THAN ~0GE ~ROVIDED IN THE DE~R, CO .0202~ AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE ~Y 15114 .~~1-~ ~A 612~0 A ZU~CH AMERIC~ INSU~CE COMPLY IN&URED CH2M HILL, INC, B 4~0 ~ST CY~SS STREET, SUre 600 T~P~ FL 3a607 C O ~ ~ ~ CERTI~ ~T ~C~ ~ I~U~Ce ~SCR~ED HEWN HA~ B~ ~U~ TO ~E {~URED NA~O HE~IN FOR ~E ~Y P~IOD ~D. ~~IN6 A~ ~QUI~M~, ~ OR ~NO~ OF ~Y ~ OR 0~ ~ME~ ~ ~SPE~ TO WHI~ ~E C~TIR~ ~Y BE I~UED ~ PE~NN, ~E INSU~ ~F~EO BY ~E ~LICI~ ~i~D H;~N ~ SU~E~ ~ ~ ~E ~6, ~NDmONS ~ ~CLUS~ ~ SUCH PO~IEE, POLICY EFFEC~! POLI~ E~I~Ol LIMITS CO TYPE OF IMSU~NCE POWCY NUIBER ~ (MUDDY{ DA~ (M~ L~ GGNE~L UABI~ G~ A~ ~ ~~ ~o~ ~&~u~Y S ., ~MOBILE L~BILI~ ~EO SING~ UM~ ~Y ~O ~DILY ~Y S~DU~D~ -- HI~D ~ ~LY I~URY AGO~GA~ S ~.FLO~' ~BI~I~ E ~H AC~DENT ~i PRom~O~ ~ IN2 ~ DIS~B~O~ UM~ - OTHER A PROFESSION~ LI~ILI~' EOo3~gszq~0 0~1~ ~01/03 $1,000.000 ~CH C~IM AND TOT~ FOR ~L ~; FI~=TE~ P~OFE~ION~ T~SPO~ATION P~NING CONSULTING SERVICES; PM: BILL G~E~ 'FOR PROFESSIO~C COVE~E. THE AGGRE~TE UMIT IS ~E TOTAL INSU~CE AVAI~CE ~OR C~ME PRESENTED W~IN ~E ~OCICY PERIOD FO~ ~L OPE~ON~ OF T~E INSU~D, THE LIMIT ~ BE REDUCED ~Y ~A~E~S OF INDEMN~ ~D ~ ~ ~ ~E ~l~ O~ HE~IN 8E ~n n~ ~ ~T~ ~m ~, ~E I~U~ ~ING CO~E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~N N~ COLLIER COU~ {FL) ~ .~u~ ~ ,enU~w, a~ F~ ~ ~ au~ ~mE n~ t~eosa NO ~u~la. 3301 TAMI~I T~IL ~T NAPLES, FL ~112-~69 L~L~ oF ~ ~ UP~ m,U I,SU~ ~;o~ ~[ ~ ~ ~ ~.~S~S. OA M~H US& iNC. BY: Dom~y ~ SteeDs ~ ~ ~" SCHEDULE C TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE 16£1 In compliance with the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act, Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, CH2M Hill, Inc. hereby certifies that wages, rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation for the Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services of the CONSULTANT to be provided under the Professional Services Agreement are accurate, complete and current as of the time of contracting. DATE: -26- 16E1 Contract # 02-3371 AGREEMENT FOR FIXED TERM PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this /~e~t~ day of /~O L}P-4~ ~J~ , 2002, by and between the Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and (hereinafter referred to as the "OWNER") and David Plummer & Associates, a Florida Corporation, authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 1531 Hendry Street, Fort Myers, FL 33901 (hereinafter referred to as the "CONSULTANT"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the OWNER desires to obtain Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services of the CONSULTANT concerning work and/or the improvement of areas within the operational jurisdiction of Collier County, such services to be performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement and with Work Orders to be issued by OWNER subsequent to execution of this Agreement; and in accordance with the conditions that each Work Order shall not exceed $90,000 and that total initial compensation for all Work Orders issued under this Agreement shall not exceed $500,000. WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT has submitted a proposal for provision of those services; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be required by the OWNER. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and provisions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE CONSULTANT'S RESPONSIBILITY 1.1. CONSULTANT shall provide to OWNER Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services in all phases of any Work Order to which this Agreement applies. 1.2. The Basic Services to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder are those set forth in this Agreement and Work Orders prepared and issued by the OWNER and executed by the parties hereto subsequent and pursuant to execution of the Agreement. The total compensation to be paid CONSULTANT by the OWNER for all Basic Services is set forth in Article Five and Schedule A, "Consultant's Employee Hourly Rate Schedule", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. 1.3. The CONSULTANT agrees to obtain and maintain throughout the period of this Agreement all such licenses as are required to do business in the State of Florida and in Collier County, Florida, including, but not limited to, all licenses required by the respective state boards and other governmental agencies responsible for regulating and licensing the professional services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement. 1.4. The CONSULTANT agrees that, when the services to be provided hereunder relate to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization or other form of legal entitlement to practice such services, it shall employ and/or retain only qualified personnel to provide such services. 1.5. CONSULTANT agrees to employ and designate a Work Manager in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving its Notice to Proceed under an executed Work Order. The Work Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of the CONSULTANT with respect to directing, coordinating and administering all aspects of the services to be provided 16El and performed under this Agreement and a Work Order. Within five (5) calendar days from the Notice to Proceed issued by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the OWNER a written statement, executed by the proper officers of the CONSULTANT, acknowledging that the Work Manager under the Work Order shall have full authority to bind and obligate the CONSULTANT on all matters arising out of or relating to such Work Order and this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the Work Manager shall devote whatever time is required to satisfactorily manage the services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder. The person selected by the CONSULTANT to serve as the Work Manager shall be subject to the prior approval and acceptance of the OWNER. 1.6. CONSULTANT agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of a written request from the OWNER, to promptly remove and replace the Work Manager, or any other personnel employed or retained by the CONSULTANT, or any subconsultants or subcontractors or any personnel of any such subconsultants or subcontractors engaged by the CONSULTANT to provide and perform services or work pursuant to the requirements of this Agreement, whom the OWNER shall request in writing to be removed, which request may be made by the OWNER with or without stating its cause to CONSULTANT. 1.7. The CONSULTANT has represented to the OWNER that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be performed pursuant to this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that all services to be provided by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the OWNER's review and approval and shall be in accordance with the generally accepted standards of professional practice in the State of Florida, as well as in accordance with all published laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations and requirements of any governmental agencies which regulate or have jurisdiction over the Project or the services to be provided and performed by CONSULTANT hereunder. In the event of any conflicts in these -3- professional judgment to advise OWNER regarding resolution of each such conflict. 1.8. CONSULTANT agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third person, firm or organization, without OWNER's prior written consent, or unless incident to the proper performance of the CONSULTANT's obligations hereunder, or in the course of judicial or legislative proceedings where such information has been properly subpoenaed, any non-public information concerning the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder, and CONSULTANT shall require all of its employees, agents, subconsultants and subcontractors to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. 1.9. If required pursuant to a Work Order, CONSULTANT agrees to provide to OWNER professional evaluations of the OWNER'S work budget. The evaluations and opinions shall be delivered to OWNER in accordance with the following schedule: (a) The professional evaluations of the OWNER's work budget shall be delivered with the report to be furnished by CONSULTANT as part of the Scope of Services. 1.10. Evaluations of the OWNER'S budget, prepared CONSULTANT'S best judgment as an experienced Engineering consultant. by the CONSULTANT represent the and qualified professional Traffic ARTICLE TWO ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANT If authorized in writing by OWNER, CONSULTANT shall furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed in Article Two herein. These services will be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Article Five and Schedule A. The following services shall be Additional Basic Services: -4- 2,1. furnished advances. Preparation of applications and supporting documents (except those already to be under this Agreement) for private or governmental grants, loans, bond issues or 16Ei 2.2. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, OWNER's schedule or character of construction; and revising previously accepted studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents previously accepted by OWNER when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent to and not reasonably anticipated prior to the preparation of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond CONSULTANT's control. 2.3 Preparation and submission of information to and necessary consultations with the Collier County Transportation Department, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Transportation, South Florida Water Management District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or other appropriate regulatory agencies, in order to obtain necessary permits or approvals for construction of the Project. 2.4 Providing renderings or models for OWNER's use. 2.5. Investigations and studies involving detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; the preparation of feasibility studies, cash flow and economic evaluations, rate schedules and appraisals; and evaluating processes available for licensing and assisting OWNER in obtaining process licensing. 2.6. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other than the contract services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder. -5- 2.7. Services during out-of-town travel required of CONSULTANT and directed by OWNER, other than visits to the Project site or OWNER's office or local travel as defined herein. 16El 2.8. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for construction, materials, equipment or services, except as otherwise provided for herein. 2.9. Providing any type of property surveys, aerial photography or related services needed for the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys for design purposes and engineering surveys and staking to enable contractors to proceed with their work and providing other special field surveys. 2.10. Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals, except as otherwise provided for herein. 2.11. Preparing to serve or serving as a CONSULTANT or witness for OWNER in any litigation, or other legal or administrative proceeding, involving the work (except for assistance in consultations which are included as part of the Basic Services to be provided herein). 2.12. Additional services rendered by CONSULTANTS not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in Collier County in accordance with generally accepted practice. ARTICLE THREE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1. The OWNER shall designate in writing a work coordinator to act as OWNER's representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement and a particular Work Order (hereinafter referred to as the "Work Coordinator"). The Work Coordinator shall have authority -6- to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER's pc i and decisions with respect to CONSULTANT's services for the work. However, the Work Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to the CONSULTANT that would have the effect, or be interpreted to have the effect, of modifying or changing in any way whatever: (a) The scope of services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder; (b) The time the CONSULTANT is obligated to commence and complete all such services; or (c) The amount of compensation the OWNER is obligated or committed to pay the CONSULTANT. 3.2. The Work Coordinator shall: (a) Review and make appropriate recommendations on all requests submitted by the CONSULTANT for payment for services and work provided and performed in accordance with this Agreement; (b) Provide all criteria and information requested by CONSULTANT as to OWNER's requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; (c) Upon request from CONSULTANT, assist CONSULTANT by placing at CONSULTANT's disposal all available information in the OWNER'S possession pertinent to the Project, including existing drawings, specifications, shop drawings, product literature, previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project (d) Arrange for access to and make all provisions for CONSULTANT to enter the site to perform the services to be provided by CONSULTANT under this Agreement; and -?- (e) Provide notice to CONSULTANT of any deficiencies or defects discovered by the OWNER with respect to the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder. 3.3. CONSULTANT acknowledges that access to any work site, to be arranged by OWNER for CONSULTANT, may be provided during times that are not the normal business hours of the CONSULTANT. 3.4. OWNER shall be responsible for the acquisition of all easements, property sites, rights-of-way, or other property rights required for the work and for the costs thereof, including the costs of any required land surveys in connection with such acquisition. ARTICLE FOUR TIME 4.1. The period of service shall be from the date of execution of this Agreement through two (2) years from that date, or until such time as all outstanding Work Orders issued prior to the expiration of the Agreement period have been completed. This Agreement may be renewed for an additional two (2) years, renewable annually. Renewal shall be agreed to, in writing, by both parties. 4.2. Services to be rendered by CONSULTANT shall be commenced subsequent to the execution of this Agreement upon written Notice to Proceed from OWNER for all or any designated portion of the project established by a Work Order and shall be performed and completed in accordance with such Work Order. Time is of the essence with respect to the performance of this Agreement. 4.3 Should CONSULTANT be obstructed or delayed in the prosecution or completion of its services as a result of unforeseeable causes beyond the control of CONSULTANT, and not due to its own fault or neglect, including but not restricted to acts of nature or of public enemy, acts of government or of the OWNER, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine regulations, strikes or -8- 16El lock-outs, then CONSULTANT shall notify OWNER in writing within five (5) working days after commencement of such delay, stating the cause or causes thereof, or be deemed to have waived any right which CONSULTANT may have had to request a time extension. 4.4. No interruption, interference, inefficiency, suspension or delay in the commencement or progress of CONSULTANT's services from any cause whatsoever, including those for which OWNER may be responsible in whole or in part, shall relieve CONSULTANT of its duty to perform or give rise to any right to damages or additional compensation from OWNER. CONSULTANT's sole remedy against OWNER will be the right to seek an extension of time to its schedule. This paragraph shall expressly apply to claims for early completion, as well as claims based on late completion. Provided, however, if through no fault or neglect of the CONSULTANT, the services to be provided hereunder by CONSULTANT have not been completed within two (2) calendar years of a Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT's compensation may be equitably adjusted, with respect to those services that have not yet been performed, to reflect the incremental increase in costs experienced by CONSULTANT after expiration of the two year period, plus all time extensions granted by OWNER to CONSULTANT. 4.5. Should the CONSULTANT fail to commence, provide, perform or complete any of the services to be provided hereunder in a timely and reasonable manner, in addition to any other rights or remedies available to the OWNER hereunder, the OWNER at its sole discretion and option may withhold any and all payments due and owing to the CONSULTANT until such time as the CONSULTANT resumes performance of its obligations hereunder in such a manner so as to reasonably establish to the OWNER's satisfaction that the CONSULTANT's performance is or will shortly be back on schedule. -9- ARTICLE FIVE COMPENSATION 16El 5.1. The COUNTY will compensate the CONSULTANT for the services performed on each Work Order in accordance with a negotiated lump sum, cost plus fixed fee, or established hourly rate as provided in Schedule A attached hereto. 5.2. Subcontractual services, if any, shall be invoiced by the CONSULTANT at the actual fees paid by the CONSULTANT. 5.3. Reimbursable expenses shall be invoiced for the expenditures incurred by the CONSULTANT as follows: 5.3.1. Expenses of transportation and living when traveling in connection with each Work Order, except for local travel within Collier or Lee Counties, as provided in Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, and fees paid for securing approval of authorities have jurisdiction over the Work Order. 5.3.2. Expenses of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings and Specifications including duplicate sets at the completion of each Work Order for the County's review and approval. 5.3.3. Expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, when authorized by the County. 5.3.4. Expense of models for the County's use. 5.4. Total compensation for all services and expenses shall not exceed the limit listed upon each Work Order without written approval. -10- 5.5. Total initial compensation for all services and expenses shall not exceed $90,000 per Work Order and total contract limit shall not exceed $500,000. 5.6. Payments for Basic Services, Additional Basic Services, Subcontractual Services, and Reimbursable Expenses as defined in Section V, shall be made upon presentation of the CONSULTANT's County-approved itemized invoice. 5.7. Records of Reimbursable Expenses and Expenses pertaining to Additional Basic Services on the Work Order shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis and shall be available and provided to the County with submittal of invoices. ARTICLE SIX OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 6.1. Upon completion or termination of this Agreement, all records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer assisted design or drafting disks and other technical data, prepared or developed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall be delivered to and become the property of OWNER. This does not apply to working papers. Said records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer disks and other technical data prepared by the CONSULTANT for each project under this Agreement are considered to be instruments of the CONSULTANT'S service. CONSULTANT, at its own expense, may retain copies for its files and internal use. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold harmless CONSULTANT with respect to any claim brought by any third party against CONSULTANT, including loss or damage from the claim including attorneys fees incurred by CONSULTANT, which claim arises out of OWNER's use of said records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer disks and other technical data on some other project unless such use is authorized by CONSULTANT. 6.2. With respect to and in consideration for the indemnification provided by OWNER in paragraphs 6.1. above, CONSULTANT has paid to OWNER $10.00, the sufficiency and receipt of which is acknowledged by OWNER through the signing of this Agreement. 16El ARTICLE SEVEN MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS 7.1. CONSULTANT will keep adequate records and supporting documentation which concern or reflect its services hereunder. The records and documentation will be retained by CONSULTANT for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of termination of this Agreement or the date the work is completed, whichever is later. OWNER, or any duly authorized agents or representatives of OWNER, shall, free of charge, have the right to audit, inspect and copy all such records and documentation as often as they deem necessary during the period of this Agreement and during the five (5) year period noted above; provided, however, such activity shall be conducted only during normal business hours. ARTICLE EIGHT INDEMNIFICATION 8.1. The CONSULTANT in consideration of $100.00, the sufficiency and receipt of which is acknowledged through the signing of this Agreement shall indemnify and hold OWNER and its officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney fees to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentional wrongful conduct of the CONSULTANT, its Subconsultants, Subcontractors, agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement or work performed thereunder. The CONSULTANT'S obligation under this paragraph shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Agreement or the CONSULTANT'S limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. 8.2. CONSULTANT acknowledges that the general conditions of any construction contract that CONSULTANT creates in performance of a Work Order shall include language, satisfactory to the OWNER's attorney, in which the contractor agrees to hold harmless and to defend OWNER, its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorney's fees, and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of the construction contract or work performed thereunder. 16El ARTICLE NINE INSURANCE 9.1. During the life of the Agreement (and until final acceptance by Owner for work performed under any Work Order issued by Owner) the CONSULTANT shall provide, pay for, and maintain, with companies satisfactory to the OWNER, the type and amounts of insurance described herein and on Exhibit B. All insurance shall be from responsible companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida and/or responsible risk retention group insurance companies registered with the State of Florida. Promptly after written Notice of Award is issued by the OWNER, the insurance coverages and limits required must be evidenced by properly executed Certificates of Insurance on forms which are acceptable to the OWNER. The Certificates must be personally, manually signed by the Authorized Representatives of the insurance company/companies shown on the Certificate with proof that he/she is an authorized representative thereof. In addition, certified, true and exact copies of all insurance policies required shall be provided to the OWNER, on a timely basis, if required by the OWNER. These Certificates and policies shall contain provisions that thirty (30) days written notice by registered or certified mail shall be given to the OWNER of any cancellation, intent not to renew, or reduction in the policies' coverages, except in the application of the Aggregate Limits Provisions. In the event of a reduction in the Aggregate Limits of any policy, the CONSULTANT shall immediately take steps to have the Aggregate Limit reinstated to the full extent permitted under such policy. All insurance coverages of the CONSULTANT shall be primary to any insurance or self-insurance program carried by the OWNER applicable to the Work. -13- 9.2. The acceptance by the OWNER of any Certificate of Insurance evidencing the insurance coverages and limits required in this Agreement does not constitute approval or agreement by the OWNER that the insurance requirements have been met or that the insurance policies shown on the Certificates of Insurance are in compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. 9.3. No work shall commence unless and until the required Certificates of Insurance are received and the written Notice to Proceed is issued to the CONSULTANT by the OWNER. 9.4. Promptly after written Notice of Award is issued by the OWNER and prior to approving any work CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain insurance of the types and to the limits specified in Schedule B entitled "Insurance Coverage", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. CONSULTANT shall require each of its subconsultants and subcontractors to procure and maintain, until the completion of that subconsultant's or subcontractor's work, insurance of the types and to the limits specified in Schedule B, unless such insurance requirement for the subconsultant or subcontractor is expressly waived in writing by the OWNER. Said waiver shall not be unreasonably withheld upon CONSULTANT representing in writing to OWNER that CONSULTANT's existing coverage includes and covers the subconsultants and subcontractors for Which a waiver is sought, and that such coverage is in conformance with the types and limits of insurance specified in Schedule B. All liability insurance policies, other than the Professional Liability, Worker's Compensation and Employers' Liability policies, obtained by CONSULTANT to meet the requirements of this Agreement shall name OWNER as an additional insured as to the operations of the CONSULTANT under this Agreement and the Contract Documents and shall contain severability of interests provisions. 9.5. If any insurance provided pursuant to this Agreement expires prior to the completion and final acceptance by Owner of any works, performed hereunder, renewal Certificates of -14- Insurance and, if requested by Owner, certified, true copies of the renewal policies shall be furnished by CONSULTANT thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration. 1 6E 1 9.6. Should at any time the CONSULTANT not maintain the insurance coverages required in this Agreement, the OWNER may cancel this Agreement or at its sole discretion shall be authorized to purchase such coverages and charge the CONSULTANT for such coverages purchased. The OWNER shall be under no obligation to purchase such insurance, nor shall it be responsible for the coverages purchased or the insurance company or companies used. The decision of the OWNER to purchase such insurance coverages shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of its rights under this Agreement. ARTICLE TEN SERVICES BY CONSULTANT'S OWN STAFF 10.1. The services to be performed hereunder shall be performed by CONSULTANT's own staff, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the OWNER. The employment of, contract with, or use of the services of any other person or firm by CONSULTANT, as independent consultant or otherwise, shall be subject to the prior written approval of the OWNER. No provision of this Agreement shall, however, be construed as constituting an agreement between the OWNER and any such other person or firm. Nor shall anything in this Agreement be deemed to give any such party or any third party any claim or right of action against the OWNER beyond such as may otherwise exist without regard to this Agreement. ARTICLE ELEVEN WAIVER OF CLAIMS 11.1. CONSULTANT's acceptance of final payment under any Work Order shall constitute a full waiver of any and all claims, except for insurance company subrogation claims, by it against OWNER arising out of this Agreement or otherwise related to the work, except those previously made in writing and identified by CONSULTANT as unsettled at the time of the final payment. -]5- Neither the acceptance of CONSULTANT's services nor payment by OWNER shall be deemed to be a waiver of any of OWNER's rights against CONSULTANT. 1 6El ARTICLE TWELVE TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 12.1. CONSULTANT shall be considered in material default of this Agreement and such default will be considered cause for OWNER to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, as further set forth in this section, for any of the following reasons: (a) failure to begin work under the Agreement within the times specified under the Notice(s) to Proceed, or (b) failure to properly and timely perform the services to be provided hereunder or as directed by OWNER, or (c) the bankruptcy or insolvency or a general assignment for the benefit of creditors by CONSULTANT or by any of CONSULTANT's principals, officers or directors, or (d) failure to obey laws, ordinances, regulations or other codes of conduct, or (e) failure to perform or abide by the terms or spirit of this Agreement, or (f) for any other just cause. The OWNER may so terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, by giving the CONSULTANT seven (7) calendar day~ written notice of the material default. 12.2. If, after notice of termination of this Agreement as provided for in paragraph 12.1 above, it is determined for any reason that CONSULTANT was not in default, or that its default was excusable, or that OWNER otherwise was not entitled to the remedy against CONSULTANT provided for in paragraph 12.1, then the notice of termination given pursuant to paragraph 12.1 shall be deemed to be the notice of termination provided for in paragraph 12.3 below and CONSULTANT's remedies against OWNER shall be the same as and limited to those afforded CONSULTANT under paragraph 12.3 below. 12.3. OWNER shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, without cause upon seven (7) calendar days written notice to CONSULTANT. In the event of such termination for convenience, CONSULTANT's recovery against OWNER shall be limited to that -]6- 16El portion of the fee earned through the date of termination, together with any retainage withheld and any costs reasonably incurred by CONSULTANT that are directly attributable to the termination, but CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to any other or further recovery against OWNER, including, but not limited to, anticipated fees or profits on work not required to be performed. CONSULTANT must mitigate all such costs to the greatest extent reasonably possible. 12.4. Upon termination, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the OWNER all original papers, records, documents, drawings, models, and other material set forth and described in this Agreement including Section 6.1. 12.5. The OWNER shall have the power to suspend all or any portions of the services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder upon giving CONSULTANT two (2) calendar days prior written notice of such suspension. If all or any portion of the services to be rendered hereunder are so suspended, the CONSULTANT's sole and exclusive remedy shall be to seek an extension of time to its schedule in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article Four herein. ARTICLE THIRTEEN TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION REPRESENTATIONS 13.1. CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement and that CONSULTANT has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. -]% 16El 13.2. In accordance with provisions of Section 287.055, (5)(a), Florida Statutes, the CONSULTANT agrees to execute the required Truth-In-Negotiation Certificate, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Schedule C, stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation are accurate, complete and current at the time of the Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the original Agreement price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the OWNER determines the Agreement price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such adjustments shall be made within one (1) year following the end of this Agreement. ARTICLE FOURTEEN CONFLICT OF INTEREST 14.1. CONSULTANT represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. ARTICLE FIFTEEN MODIFICATION 15.1. No modification or change in this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon either party unless in writing and executed by the party or parties intended to be bound by it. ARTICLE SIXTEEN NOTICES AND ADDRESS OF RECORD 16.1. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the CONSULTANT to the OWNER shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following OWNER's address of record: Board of County Commissioners, Collier County Florida Purchasing Department ~18- 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FI. 34112 Attention: Purchasing Director 16£1 16.2. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT shall be made in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by the United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following CONSULTANT's address of record: David Plummer & Associates 1531 Hendry Street Fort Myers, FI 33901 Attention: Mr. Mark J. Gillis, Sr. Vice-President 16.3. Either party may change its address of record by written notice to the other party given in accordance with requirements of this Article. ARTICLE SEVENTEEN MISCELLANEOUS 17.1. CONSULTANT, in representing OWNER, shall promote the best interest of OWNER and assume towards OWNER a duty of the highest trust, confidence, and fair dealing. 17.2. No modification, waiver, suspension or termination of the Agreement or of any terms thereof shall impair the rights or liabilities of either party. 17.3. This Agreement is not assignable, or otherwise transferable in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of OWNER. 17.4. Waiver by either party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement. -19- 17.5. The headings of the Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments as contained in this Agreement are for the purpose of convenience only and shall not be deemed to expand, limit or change the provisions in such Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments. 16El 17.6. This Agreement, initially consisting of 26 continuously numbered pages including the referenced Schedules and Attachments hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and shall supersede, replace and nullify any and all prior agreements or understandings, written or oral, relating to the matter set forth herein, and any such prior agreements or understanding shall have no force or effect whatever on this Agreement. 17.7 COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS AGREEMENT. This Agreement consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the Agreement as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, RFP #02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services", Consultant's Fee Schedule "A", Insurance Coverage Schedule "B", Truth in Negotiation Schedule "C". ARTICLE EIGHTEEN APPLICABLE LAW 18.1. Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the laws, rules, and regulations of the State of Florida, and by such laws, rules and regulations of the United States as made applicable to when providing services funded by the United States government. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate Florida state court in Collier County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Professional Services Agreement for Fixed Term Professinal Transportation Planning Consulting Services the day and year first written above. -20- 16El BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL S U B DIVI S IO~~.~/TATE OF. FLORIDA By: James N. Coletta, Chairman David Plummer & Associates Witnessed: By: ' - '- · %/ (Ty~e name):/ susan ~. :K±11meyer (Type hame): Rn.ario 8oruvides (CORPORATE SEAL) By: (Type name): ~b.v J. (Title): ~resid~nt Plummer -2]- SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE A Collier County Standard Fee Schedule RFP 02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services" Professional Credentials Principal P.E. $150.00/hr Project Manager P.E. $100.00/hr Senior Planner/Engineer A.T.C.P. or P.E. $100.00/hr Planner/Engineer A.I.C.P. or P.E. $90.00/hr Senior Technician $55.00/hr Technician $45.00/hr Sur~m~rt Administrative Assistant, Secretary $45.00/hr Clerical, other support $35.00/hr 16El ' This list is not intended to be all-inclusive. The County and firm on a project-by-project basis as needed shall mutually negotiate hourly rate fees for other categories of professional, support and other services, END OFSCHEDULEA -22- SCHEDULE B INSURANCE COVERAGE 16£1 (1) The amounts and types of insurance coverage shall minimum requirements with the use of Insurance Services endorsements or their equivalents. conform to the following Office (ISO) forms and WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Insurance shall be maintained by the Contractor/Consultant/Professional during the term of this Agreement for all employees engaged in the work under this Agreement in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The amounts of such insurance shall not be less than: a. Worker's Compensation - Florida Statutory Requirements b. Employers' Liability (check one) X $100,000 Each Accident $500,000 Disease Aggregate $100,000 Disease Each Employee (2) The insurance company shall waive its Rights of Subrogation against the Owner and the policy shall be so endorsed. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Insurance shall be maintained by the Contractor/Consultant/Professional. Coverage will include, but not be limited to, Bodily Injury, Property Damage, Personal Injury, Contractual Liability for this Agreement, Independent Contractors, Broad Form Property Damage including Completed Operations and Products and Completed Operations Coverage. Products and Completed Operations coverage shall be maintained for a period of not less than five (5) years following the completion and acceptance -23- by the Owner of the work under this Agreement. following: (check one) X General Aggregate Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Personal and Advertising Injury Each Occurrence Fire Damage Limits of Liability shall not be less than the 16El $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $ 50,000 (2) The General Aggregate Limit shall apply separately to this Project and the policy shall be endorsed using the following endorsement wording. "This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: Commercial General Liability Coverage Part. The General Aggregate Limit under LIMITS OF INSURANCE applies separately to each of your projects away from premises owned by or rented to you." (3) If the General Liability insurance required herein is issued or renewed on a "claims made" basis, as opposed to the "occurrence" form, the retroactive date for coverage shall be no later than the commencement date of the Project and shall provide that in the event of cancellation or non-renewal the Extended Reporting Period (Discovery Period) for claims shall be no less than three (3) years. (4) The Owner shall be named as an Additional Insured and the policy shall be endorsed that such coverage shall be primary to any similar coverage carried by the Owner. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE shall be maintained by the Contractor / Consultant / Professional for the ownership, maintenance or use of any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle with limits of not less than: (check one) X Bodily Injury & Property Damage - $ 500,000 PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE shall be maintained by the Consultant/Professional to insure its legal liability for claims arising out of the performance of professional services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall have limits of not less than X $1,000,000 each claim and in the aggregate -24- (2) Any deductible applicable to any claim shall be the sole Consultant/Professional and shall not be greater than $50,000 each claim. responsibility of the 16E1 (3) The Consultant/Professional shall continue this coverage for this Project for a period of not less than five (5) years following completion and acceptance of the Project by the Owner. END OF SCHEDULE B. -25- From: Teresa Dawson At ©swald Trppe 5 CD FaxlD: To Rosemarie Date: !C/1/02 01:28 PM Page: 2 of 2 ACO.e .. CERTIFICATE OF LIABII PRODUCER Oswald Trippe & Co. Ft. Myers ~. C. Box 60139 Ft. Myers FL 33906-6139 Phone:239-433-4535 Fax:239-433-4148 INSURED avid Plummet & Associates 750 Ponce Deleon Blvd Coral Gables F~ 33134-4417 .ITY INSURANCF OP,D TDl ~AVI- t I 1 0/01/02 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. IN SIJ RE ;4 A: INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE The Hartford Insurance Co. iNSURER C INSURER D INSURER 16E COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF ;NSLIRANCE LISTED BELOW ~.VE ~EEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLIC~ PERIO~ INO~ATED NO [WITHSIANDING ANY REQUIREM EhT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANv CONTACT O R OTHER DOCUMENT WITH ~S PEC~ TO WHICH TH[S CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PEE~AIN. THE iNSURANCE AFFORDEO BY THE POL~IE~ DE SCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL TH~ TERN'S. EXCLUSIONS AND CONOI'E~ONS OF SUCH PDLIC~ES AGGREGATE LMITS ~HOWN MAY HA~ BEEN REDUCED BY mAID C~IMS LTR ~PE GF tN~ORANCE P~ICY NUMBER A A PDUCY EFFEC TIrE PCUCY EXPIRATION DAT~ (MMiD~h~') DANTE [N GENERAL LIABILITY ~ !COMN1ERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Ic,^~s M~E L_X_ OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT ~PPLIES PER 21SBALD5168 0e/;~/02 AUTOMOBILE LIABI Li*"Y X ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULE O AU I OS HIRED A~TOS NON-OWNF'D AU FOS GENERAL AGGREGATE i ~.~ 000,000 - ccMa~:~os~aL~:~,n' ] S ~ O00,OOC BO~LY JN~RY j~ (Per accident) P~E~TY DAMAGE (Per accident) GAP. AGE LIAB!LITY ANY AUTO EXCESS LIABILITY ~ OCCUR ~ CLA!M5 M,~'DE RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYER~' LIABILITY 21UECVP9351 07/23/02 , OTHER 0?/23/03 i AUTOONL¥-EAACCIDENT j $ I OYHER ThAN EAACC: j $ AUTO ONlY AGO S LAC H OCCURRE NC E S AGGEFGATE j B is wC?'ffi'X"'~ u TORY L I ;1IT ~_~I_____F_~j EACH ACCIDENT ] $ DISEASE - EAFMPLOYEE $ DISEASE - POLI~Y L~iT DESCRIPTmONOF~E~TION~OCAF~NS~VEHICL~XCLUS~NSADDEDBYEND~SEMENT~PEClA~OVIS,~O~S Re: Contract 02-3371 CertiEicate holder is named as additional insured with interest operations with respect to General Liability only, i~ insu=ed's r AD IT I ( CERTIFICATE HOLDER y j o I~ INSURED; NSURER.E?TER~ __. CANCELLATION col3301 Collier County Government Purchasing Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples FL 34112 ACORO 25-S (?lC?) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DE,CAlLED ;OulCIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAil ~ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTJF~ATE ~LDE~ N~ TO THE ~FT. B~T FAIL~ TO ~ SO SHALL IMPOSE NO ~L:GATiON OR LIABILITY ~F ANY KIND UPON THE IN8~ R ER, I~ AGENTS ~ ~PR~ENTATIV~. ~ACORD CORPO~T~N 198B ACORDr. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MMIDD/YYYY) 09/27/2002 PRODUCER INSURED Elliott McKiever Stowe Inc. 2222 Ponce DeLeon Blvd Fourth Floor Coral Gables, FL 33134-5039 David Plumier & Associates, Inc. 1750 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 COVERAGES THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. / _ INSURE~RS AFFORDI~N_G COVERAG~E _ _ ]NAIC # [J_~_s.~uEE?61 Lloyds Underw_rit.e_r~ % StewartSm_itb~SE~ INSURER C: ....... !~ ~llI INSURER D: INSURER E: i THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BE-EN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADD'L '~-I~)~i~¥-E'~TIVE i POLICY ExPIRA-Ti0N .... LTR NSRD; TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER / DATE tMMIDD/yyI ! DATE IMM/DD/YY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE I DAMA~E~ TO RENTED C~MMERclAL I ~R_E_MISES (Ea occurence) GENERAL LIABILITY $ , CLAIMS MADE OCCUR i MED EXp (~Any one person) $ ..... ; PERSONAL_& ADV INJ~URY ~$ _. GENERAL AGGREGATE $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: : PRODUCTS - COMP/DP AGO --I POLICY [---1J,GTPR°' ~-1 LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT __ ANYAUTO i (Ea accident) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) $ HIRED AUTOS I , BODILY INJURY ~ NON-OWNED AUTOS I i (Per accident)~ ..... $ (Per accident) I AUTO ONLY- EA ACCIDENT I I OTHER THAN EA ACC $ ~ I ; ' AUTO ONLY: j AGG $ EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILIW i i EACH OCCUR_~R_E.N~E ~ OCCUR ~ CLAIMS MADE ! i AGGREGATE $ [r~DEDUCTIBLE I i is RETENTION $ ! I i , I [ WC STATU- OTH- WORKERS COMPENSATION AND I ~ L~J~Y_ LIMITS · ER EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY I ; E.g. EACH ACCIDENT I ' I ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNEPJEXECUTIVE I $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, descdbe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below , EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ OTHER I A ' EF40000-53 10/22/2001 10/22/2002 ~ $2,oo0,00o EACH CLAIM Professional Liability/ $2,000,000 AGGREGATE i "Claims Made Form" DEDUCTIBLE: $25,000 each claim DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES ! EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT / SPECIAL PROVISIONS ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS RE: CONTRACT NO. 02-3371, "FIXED TERM PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES" CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Administrative Services Div., Purchasing Dept. Purchasing Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples FI. 34112 ACORD 25 (2001108) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. ~x~x'~c~x~'~m~:~r~Kxxx._AxG~ENT 0f REC0~[~) ~.~.. ©{~ORD CORPORATION 198~' ACORDr. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DDfYY) 09/27/2002 PRODUCER Elliott McKiever Stowe Inc. 2222 Ponce DeLeon Blvd Fourth Floor C_ora~l._G__~bJes__, FL 33134-5039 INSURED David Plumier & Associates, Inc. 1750 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER A: FLORIDA R_~TAIL FE_DERAT QN S_ELF- NSU_RER_ FUND .1_6E1_ iNSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR -POLICY EFFECTIVE I~LICY EXP~'i'IO~ ~ LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE (MMIDD/YY) ! DATE(MM/DD/YY) LIMITS , GENERAL LIABILITY [ ~ EACH OCCURRENCE , $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ' FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ _. CLAIMS MADE ,' OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) : $ ! .... I pERSONAL &.,~D¥ iNJURY _ $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: ~ PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ ---- ~PRO. r--~ .... i' POLICY ~ JEgT· / LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ---- COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT r- ANY AUTO (Ea accide_nt) _ FALL OVVNED AUTOS I BODILY INJURY I $ (Per person) SCHEDULED AUTOS ........ HIRED AUTOS ~ ~ ] BODILY INJURY '! NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) $ I I PROPERTY DAMAGE I (Per accident) I $ GARAGE LIABILITY i AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO i I ' ] OTHER THAN EAACC $ i j j AUTO ONLY: - j ! j AGG EXCESS LIABILITY i . EACH OCCURRENCE $ !~ .I OCCUR j CLAIMS MADEIi I AGGREGATE.. . ~J $ i ~/ I WC STAIN- I JOTH- i LRETENTION S $ A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS, LIABILITY #520-05122 01/01/2002 01/01/2003 i/~ L T_O~RY_ LIMITS, : ~ , E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ ; .... 1000000 i i E.L. DISEASE- EA EMPLOYEE] $ 1000000 J J E.L. DISEASE - POliCY LIMIT ! $ 1000000 j OTHER ; I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS RE: CONTRACT NO. 02-3371, "FIXED TERM PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES" CERTIFICATE HOLDER j ADDITIONAL INSURED; INSURER LETTER: CANCELLATION COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Administrative Serv. Div.-Purchasing Dept. Purchasing Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail I Naples FI 34112 ACORD 25-S (7197) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 * DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAJLURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (e'A~ ORD CORPORATION 191i8 SCHEDULE C TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE 16E1 In compliance with the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act, Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, David Plummer & Associates hereby certifies that wages, rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation for the Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services of the CONSULTANT to be provided under the Professional Services Agreement are accurate, complete and current as of the time of contracting. BY: ~ DATE: /0///~,..~ -26- 16E1 Contract # 02-3371 AGREEMENT FOR FIXED TERM PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this / ?~f'~' day of .~] I) tJ~_rvk~ e.~._ , 2002, by and between the Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and (hereinafter referred to as the "OWNER") and TBE Group a Florida Corporation, authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 380 Park Place Boulevard, Suite 300, Clearwater, FL 33759 (hereinafter referred to as the "CONSULTANT"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the OWNER desires to obtain Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services of the CONSULTANT concerning work and/or the improvement of areas within the operational jurisdiction of Collier County, such services to be performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement and with Work Orders to be issued by OWNER subsequent to execution of this Agreement; and in accordance with the conditions that each Work Order shall not exceed $90,000 and that total initial compensation for all Work Orders issued under this Agreement shall not exceed $500,000. WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT has submitted a proposal for provision of those services; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be required by the OWNER. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and provisions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: the mutual covenants and 16El ARTICLE ONE CONSULTANT'S RESPONSIBILITY 1.1. CONSULTANT shall provide to OWNER Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services in all phases of any Work Order to which this Agreement applies. 1.2. The Basic Services to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder are those set forth in this Agreement and Work Orders prepared and issued by the OWNER and executed by the parties hereto subsequent and pursuant to execution of the Agreement. The total compensation to be paid CONSULTANT by the OWNER for all Basic Services is set forth in Article Five and Schedule A, "Consultant's Employee Hourly Rate Schedule", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. 1.3. The CONSULTANT agrees to obtain and maintain throughout the period of this Agreement all such licenses as are required to do business in the State of Florida and in Collier County, Florida, including, but not limited to, all licenses required by the respective state boards and other governmental agencies responsible for regulating and licensing the professional services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement. 1.4. The CONSULTANT agrees that, when the services to be provided hereunder relate to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization or other form of legal entitlement to practice such services, it shall employ and/or retain only qualified personnel to provide such services. 1.5. CONSULTANT agrees to employ and designate a Work Manager in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving its Notice to Proceed under an executed Work Order. The Work Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of the CONSULTANT with respect to directing, coordinating and administering all aspects of the services to be provided 2 16El and performed under this Agreement and a Work Order. Within five (5) calendar days from the Notice to Proceed issued by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the OWNER a written statement, executed by the proper officers of the CONSULTANT, acknowledging that the Work Manager under the Work Order shall have full authority to bind and obligate the CONSULTANT on all matters arising out of or relating to such Work Order and this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the Work Manager shall devote whatever time is required to satisfactorily manage the services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder. The person selected by the CONSULTANT to serve as the Work Manager shall be subject to the prior approval and acceptance of the OWNER. 1.6. CONSULTANT agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of a written request from the OWNER, to promptly remove and replace the Work Manager, or any other personnel employed or retained by the CONSULTANT, or any subconsultants or subcontractors or any personnel of any such subconsultants or subcontractors engaged by the CONSULTANT to provide and perform services or work pursuant to the requirements of this Agreement, whom the OWNER shall request in writing to be removed, which request may be made by the OWNER with or without stating its cause to CONSULTANT. 1.7. The CONSULTANT has represented to the OWNER that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be performed pursuant to this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that all services to be provided by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the OWNER's review and approval and shall be in accordance with the generally accepted standards of professional practice in the State of Florida, as well as in accordance with all published laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations and requirements of any governmental agencies which regulate or have jurisdiction over the Project or the services to be provided and performed by CONSULTANT hereunder. In the event of any conflicts in these -3- 16E1 requirements, the CONSULTANT shall notify the OWNER of such conflict and utilize its best professional judgment to advise OWNER regarding resolution of each such conflict. 1.8. CONSULTANT agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third person, firm or organization, without OWNER's prior written consent, or unless incident to the proper performance of the CONSULTANT's obligations hereunder, or in the course of judicial or legislative proceedings where such information has been properly subpoenaed, any non-public information concerning the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder, and CONSULTANT shall require all of its employees, agents, subconsultants and subcontractors to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. 1.9. If required pursuant to a Work Order, CONSULTANT agrees to provide to OWNER professional evaluations of the OWNER'S work budget. The evaluations and opinions shall be delivered to OWNER in accordance with the following schedule: (a) The professional evaluations of the OWNER's work budget shall be delivered with the report to be furnished by CONSULTANT as part of the Scope of Services. 1.10. Evaluations of the OWNER'S budget, prepared by the CONSULTANT represent the CONSULTANT'S best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional Traffic Engineering consultant. ARTICLE TWO ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANT If authorized in writing by OWNER, CONSULTANT shall furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed in Article Two herein. These services will be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Article Five and Schedule A. The following services shall be Additional Basic Services: -4- 16E! 2.1. Preparation of applications and supporting documents (except those already to be furnished under this Agreement) for private or governmental grants, loans, bond issues or advances. 2.2. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, OWNER's schedule or character of construction; and revising previously accepted studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents previously accepted by OWNER when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent to and not reasonably anticipated prior to the preparation of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond CONSULTANT's control. 2.3 Preparation and submission of information to and necessary consultations with the Collier County Transportation Department, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Transportation, South Florida Water Management District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or other appropriate regulatory agencies, in order to obtain necessary permits or approvals for construction of the Project. 2.4 Providing renderings or models for OWNER's use. 2.5. Investigations and studies involving detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; the preparation of feasibility studies, cash flow and economic evaluations, rate schedules and appraisals; and evaluating processes available for licensing and assisting OWNER in obtaining process licensing. 2.6. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other than the contract services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder. -5- 16El 2.7. Services during out-of-town travel required of CONSULTANT and directed by OWNER, other than visits to the Project site or OWNER's office or local travel as defined herein. 2.8. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for construction, materials, equipment or services, except as otherwise provided for herein. 2.9. Providing any type of property surveys, aerial photography or related services needed for the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys for design purposes and engineering surveys and staking to enable contractors to proceed with their work and providing other special field surveys. 2.10. Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals, except as otherwise provided for herein. 2.11. Preparing to serve or serving as a CONSULTANT or witness for OWNER in any litigation, or other legal or administrative proceeding, involving the work (except for assistance in consultations which are included as part of the Basic Services to be provided herein). 2.12. Additional services rendered by CONSULTANTS not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in Collier County in accordance with generally accepted practice. ARTICLE THREE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1. The OWNER shall designate in writing a work coordinator to act as OWNER's representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement and a particular Work Order (hereinafter referred to as the "Work Coordinator"). The Work Coordinator shall have authority -6- 16El_ decisions with respect to CONSULTANT's services for the work. However, the Work Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to the CONSULTANT that would have the effect, or be interpreted to have the effect, of modifying or changing in any way whatever: (a) The scope of services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder; (b) The time the CONSULTANT is obligated to commence and complete all such services; or (c) The amount of compensation the OWNER is obligated or committed to pay the CONSULTANT. 3.2. The Work Coordinator shall: (a) Review and make appropriate recommendations on all requests submitted by the CONSULTANT for payment for services and work provided and performed in accordance with this Agreement; (b) Provide all criteria and information requested by CONSULTANT as to OWNER's requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; (c) Upon request from CONSULTANT, assist CONSULTANT by placing at CONSULTANT's disposal all available information in the OWNER'S possession pertinent to the Project, including existing drawings, specifications, shop drawings, product literature, previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project (d) Arrange for access to and make all provisions for CONSULTANT to enter the site to perform the services to be provided by CONSULTANT under this Agreement; and -7- 16El (e) Provide notice to CONSULTANT of any deficiencies or defects discovered by the OWNER with respect to the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder. 3.3. CONSULTANT acknowledges that access to any work site, to be arranged by OWNER for CONSULTANT, may be provided during times that are not the normal business hours of the CONSULTANT. 3.4. OWNER shall be responsible for the acquisition of all easements, property sites, rights-of-way, or other property rights required for the work and for the costs thereof, including the costs of any required land surveys in connection with such acquisition. ARTICLE FOUR TIME 4.1. The period of service shall be from the date of execution of this Agreement through two (2) years from that date, or until such time as all outstanding Work Orders issued prior to the expiration of the Agreement period have been completed. This Agreement may be renewed for an additional two (2) years, renewable annually. Renewal shall be agreed to, in writing, by both parties. 4.2. Services to be rendered by CONSULTANT shall be commenced subsequent to the execution of this Agreement upon written Notice to Proceed from OWNER for all or any designated portion of the project established by a Work Order and shall be performed and completed in accordance with such Work Order. Time is of the essence with respect to the performance of this Agreement. 4.3 Should CONSULTANT be obstructed or delayed in the prosecution or completion of its services as a result of unforeseeable causes beyond the control of CONSULTANT, and not due to its own fault or neglect, including but not restricted to acts of nature or of public enemy, acts of government or of the OWNER, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine regulations, strikes or -8- lock-outs, then CONSULTANT shall notify OWNER in writing within five (5)worki~l~ ~~ commencement of such delay, stating the cause or causes thereof, or be deemed to have waived any right which CONSULTANT may have had to request a time extension. 4.4. No interruption, interference, inefficiency, suspension or delay in the commencement or progress of CONSULTANT's services from any cause whatsoever, including those for which OWNER may be responsible in whole or in part, shall relieve CONSULTANT of its duty to perform or give rise to any right to damages or additional compensation from OWNER. CONSULTANT's sole remedy against OWNER will be the right to seek an extension of time to its schedule. This paragraph shall expressly apply to claims for early completion, as well as claims based on late completion. Provided, however, if through no fault or neglect of the CONSULTANT, the services to be provided hereunder by CONSULTANT have not been completed within two (2) calendar years of a Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT's compensation may be equitably adjusted, with respect to those services that have not yet been performed, to reflect the incremental increase in costs experienced by CONSULTANT after expiration of the two year period, plus all time extensions granted by OWNER to CONSULTANT. 4.5. Should the CONSULTANT fail to commence, provide, perform or complete any of the services to be provided hereunder in a timely and reasonable manner, in addition to any other rights or remedies available to the OWNER hereunder, the OWNER at its sole discretion and option may withhold any and all payments due and owing to the CONSULTANT until such time as the CONSULTANT resumes performance of its obligations hereunder in such a manner so as to reasonably establish to the OWNER's satisfaction that the CONSULTANT's performance is or will shortly be back on schedule. -9- ARTICLE FIVE COMPENSATION 16E1 5.1. The COUNTY will compensate the CONSULTANT for the services performed on each Work Order in accordance with a negotiated lump sum, cost plus fixed fee, or established hourly rate as provided in Schedule A attached hereto. 5.2. Subcontractual services, if any, shall be invoiced by the CONSULTANT at the actual fees paid by the CONSULTANT. 5.3. Reimbursable expenses shall be invoiced for the expenditures incurred by the CONSULTANT as follows: 5.3.1. Expenses of transportation and living when traveling in connection with each Work Order, except for local travel within Collier or Lee Counties, as provided in Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, and fees paid for securing approval of authorities have jurisdiction over the Work Order. 5.3.2. Expenses of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings and Specifications including duplicate sets at the completion of each Work Order for the County's review and approval. 5.3.3. Expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, when authorized by the County. 5.3.4. Expense of models for the County's use. 5.4. Total compensation for all services and expenses shall not exceed the limit listed upon each Work Order without written approval. -10- 5.5. 16El Total initial compensation for all services and expenses shall not exceed $90,000 per Work Order and total contract limit shall not exceed $500,000. 5.6. Payments for Basic Services, Additional Basic Services, Subcontractual Services, and Reimbursable Expenses as defined in Section V, shall be made upon presentation of the CONSULTANT's County-approved itemized invoice. 5.7. Records of Reimbursable Expenses and Expenses pertaining to Additional Basic Services on the Work Order shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis and shall be available and provided to the County with submittal of invoices. ARTICLE SIX OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 6.1.. Upon completion or termination of this Agreement, all records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer assisted design or drafting disks and other technical data, prepared or developed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall be delivered to and become the property of OWNER. This does not apply to working papers. Said records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer disks and other technical data prepared by the CONSULTANT for each project under this Agreement are considered to be instruments of the CONSULTANT'S service. CONSULTANT, at its own expense, may retain copies for its files and internal use. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold harmless CONSULTANT with respect to any claim brought by any third party against CONSULTANT, including loss or damage from the claim including attorneys fees incurred by CONSULTANT, which claim arises out of OWNER's use of said records, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports, computer disks and other technical data on some other project unless such use is authorized by CONSULTANT. -11- 16E1 6.2. With respect to and in consideration for the indemnification provided by OWNER in paragraphs 6.1. above, CONSULTANT has paid to OWNER $10.00, the sufficiency and receipt of which is acknowledged by OWNER through the signing of this Agreement. ARTICLE SEVEN MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS 7.1. CONSULTANT will keep adequate records and supporting documentation which concern or reflect its services hereunder. The records and documentation will be retained by CONSULTANT for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of termination of this Agreement or the date the work is completed, whichever is later. OWNER, or any duly authorized agents or representatives of OWNER, shall, free of charge, have the right to audit, inspect and copy all such records and documentation as often as they deem necessary during the period of this Agreement and during the five (5) year period noted above; provided, however, such activity shall be conducted only during normal business hours. ARTICLE EIGHT INDEMNIFICATION 8.1. The CONSULTANT in consideration of $100.00, the sufficiency and receipt of which is acknowledged through the signing of this Agreement shall indemnify and hold OWNER and its officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney fees to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentional wrongful conduct of the CONSULTANT, its Subconsultants, Subcontractors, agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement or work performed thereunder. The CONSULTANT'S obligation under this paragraph shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Agreement or the CONSULTANT'S limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. 8.2. CONSULTANT acknowledges that the general conditions of any construction contract that CONSULTANT creates in performance of a Work Order shall include language, satisfactory to -12- 16£1 the OWNER's attorney, in which the contractor agrees to hold harmless and to defend OWNER, its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorney's fees, and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of the construction contract or work performed thereunder. ARTICLE NINE INSURANCE 9.1. During the life of the Agreement (and until final acceptance by Owner for work performed under any Work Order issued by Owner) the CONSULTANT shall provide, pay for, and maintain, with companies satisfactory to the OWNER, the type and amounts of insurance described herein and on Exhibit B. All insurance shall be from responsible companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida and/or responsible risk retention group insurance companies registered with the State of Florida. Promptly after written Notice of Award is issued by the OWNER, the insurance coverages and limits required must be evidenced by properly executed Certificates of Insurance on forms which are acceptable to the OWNER. The Certificates must be personally, manually signed by the Authorized Representatives of the insurance company/companies shown on the Certificate with proof that he/she is an authorized representative thereof. In addition, certified, true and exact copies of all insurance policies required shall be provided to the OWNER, on a timely basis, if required by the OWNER. These Certificates and policies shall contain provisions that thirty (30) days written notice by registered or certified mail shall be given to the OWNER of any cancellation, intent not to renew, or reduction in the policies' coverages, except in the application of the Aggregate Limits Provisions. In the event of a reduction in the Aggregate Limits of any policy, the CONSULTANT shall immediately take steps to have the Aggregate Limit reinstated to the full extent permitted under such policy. All insurance coverages of the CONSULTANT shall be primary to any insurance or self-insurance program carried by the OWNER applicable to the Work. -13- 16El 9.2. The acceptance by the OWNER of any Certificate of Insurance evidencing the insurance coverages and limits required in this Agreement does not constitute approval or agreement by the OWNER that the insurance requirements have been met or that the insurance policies shown on the Certificates of Insurance are in compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. 9.3. No work shall commence unless and until the required Certificates of Insurance are received and the written Notice to Proceed is issued to the CONSULTANT by the OWNER. 9.4. Promptly after written Notice of Award is issued by the OWNER and prior to approving any work CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain insurance of the types and to the limits specified in Schedule B entitled "Insurance Coverage", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. CONSULTANT shall require each of its subconsultants and subcontractors to procure and maintain, until the completion of that subconsultant's or subcontractor's work, insurance of the types and to the limits specified in Schedule B, unless such insurance requirement for the subconsultant or subcontractor is expressly waived in writing by the OWNER. Said waiver shall not be unreasonably withheld upon CONSULTANT representing in writing to OWNER that CONSULTANT's existing coverage includes and covers the subconsultants and subcontractors for which a waiver is sought, and that such coverage is in conformance with the types and limits of insurance specified in Schedule B. All liability insurance policies, other than the Professional Liability, Worker's Compensation and Employers' Liability policies, obtained by CONSULTANT to meet the requirements of this Agreement shall name OWNER as an additional insured as to the operations of the CONSULTANT under this Agreement and the Contract Documents and shall contain severability of interests provisions. 9.5. If any insurance provided pursuant to this Agreement expires prior to the completion and final acceptance by Owner of any works, performed hereunder, renewal Certificates of -14- Insurance and, if requested by Owner, certified, true copies of the renewal poli be furnished by CONSULTANT thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration. 9.6. Should at any time the CONSULTANT not maintain the insurance coverages required in this Agreement, the OWNER may cancel this Agreement or at its sole discretion shall be authorized to purchase such coverages and charge the CONSULTANT for such coverages purchased. The OWNER shall be under no obligation to purchase such insurance, nor shall it be responsible for the coverages purchased or the insurance company or companies used. The decision of the OWNER to purchase such insurance coverages shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of its rights under this Agreement. ARTICLE TEN SERVICES BY CONSULTANT'S OWN STAFF 10.1. The services to be performed hereunder shall be performed by CONSULTANT's own staff, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the OWNER. The employment of, contract with, or use of the services of any other person or firm by CONSULTANT, as independent consultant or otherwise, shall be subject to the prior written approval of the OWNER. No provision of this Agreement shall, however, be construed as constituting an agreement between the OWNER and any such other person or firm. Nor shall anything in this Agreement be deemed to give any such party or any third party any claim or right of action against the OWNER beyond such as may otherwise exist without regard to this Agreement. ARTICLE ELEVEN WAIVER OF CLAIMS 11.1. CONSULTANT's acceptance of final payment under any Work Order shall constitute a full waiver of any and all claims, except for insurance company subrogation claims, by it against OWNER arising out of this Agreement or otherwise related to the work, except those previously made in writing and identified by CONSULTANT as unsettled at the time of the final payment. 16Ei Neither the acceptance of CONSULTANT's services nor payment by OWNER shall be deemed to be a waiver of any of OWNER's rights against CONSULTANT. ARTICLE TWELVE TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 12.1. CONSULTANT shall be considered in material default of this Agreement and such default will be considered cause for OWNER to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, as further set forth in this section, for any of the following reasons: (a) failure to begin work under the Agreement within the times specified under the Notice(s) to Proceed, or (b) failure to properly and timely perform the services to be provided hereunder or as directed by OWNER, or (c) the bankruptcy or insolvency or a general assignment for the benefit of creditors by CONSULTANT or by any of CONSULTANT's principals, officers or directors, or (d) failure to obey laws, ordinances, regulations or other codes of conduct, or (e) failure to perform or abide by the terms or spirit of this Agreement, or (f) for any other just cause. The OWNER may so terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, by giving the CONSULTANT seven (7) calendar day~ written notice of the material default. 12.2. If, after notice of termination of this Agreement as provided for in paragraph 12.1 above, it is determined for any reason that CONSULTANT was not in default, or that its default was excusable, or that OWNER otherwise was not entitled to the remedy against CONSULTANT provided for in paragraph 12.1, then the notice of termination given pursuant to paragraph 12.1 shall be deemed to be the notice of termination provided for in paragraph 12.3 below and CONSULTANT's remedies against OWNER shall be the same as and limited to those afforded CONSULTANT under paragraph 12.3 below. 12.3. OWNER shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, without cause upon seven (7) calendar days written notice to CONSULTANT. In the event of such termination for convenience, CONSULTANT's recovery against OWNER shall be limited to that 16El portion of the fee earned through the date of termination, together with any retainage withheld and any costs reasonably incurred by CONSULTANT that are directly attributable to the termination, but CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to any other or further recovery against OWNER, including, but not limited to, anticipated fees or profits on work not required to be performed. CONSULTANT must mitigate all such costs to the greatest extent reasonably possible. 12.4. Upon termination, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the OWNER all original papers, records, documents, drawings, models, and other material set forth and described in this Agreement including Section 6.1. 12.5. The OWNER shall have the power to suspend all or any portions of the services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder upon giving CONSULTANT two (2) calendar days prior written notice of such suspension. If all or any portion of the services to be rendered hereunder are so suspended, the CONSULTANT's sole and exclusive remedy shall be to seek an extension of time to its schedule in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article Four herein. ARTICLE THIRTEEN TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION REPRESENTATIONS 13.1. CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement and that CONSULTANT has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. -17- 16E1 13.2. In accordance with provisions of Section 287.055, (5)(a), Florida Statutes, the CONSULTANT agrees to execute the required Truth-In-Negotiation Certificate, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Schedule C, stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation are accurate, complete and current at the time of the Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the original Agreement price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the OWNER determines the Agreement price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such Agreement. adjustments shall be made within one (1) year following the end of this ARTICLE FOURTEEN CONFLICT OF INTEREST 14.1. CONSULTANT represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. ARTICLE FIFTEEN MODIFICATION 15.1. No modification or change in this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon either party unless in writing and executed by the party or parties intended to be bound by it. ARTICLE SIXTEEN NOTICES AND ADDRESS OF RECORD 16.1. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the CONSULTANT to the OWNER shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following OWNER's address of record: Board of County Commissioners, Collier County Florida Purchasing Department 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FI. 34112 Attention: Purchasing Director 16E1 16.2. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT shall be made in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by the United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following CONSULTANT's address of record: TBE Group, Inc. 380 Park Place Boulevard Suite 300 Clearwater, FL 33759 Attention: Mr. Richard T. Doyle, Sr. Vice-President 16.3. Either party may change its address of record by written notice to the other party given in accordance with requirements of this Article. ARTICLE SEVENTEEN MISCELLANEOUS 17.1. CONSULTANT, in representing OWNER, shall promote the best interest of OWNER and assume towards OWNER a duty of the highest trust, confidence, and fair dealing. 17.2. No modification, waiver, suspension or termination of the Agreement or of any terms thereof shall impair the rights or liabilities of either party. 17.3. This Agreement is not assignable, or otherwise transferable in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of OWNER. 17.4. Waiver by either party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement. 16E1 17.5. The headings of the Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments as contained in this Agreement are for the purpose of convenience only and shall not be deemed to expand, limit or change the provisions in such Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments. 17.6. This Agreement, initially consisting of 26 continuously numbered pages including the referenced Schedules and Attachments hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and shall supersede, replace and nullify any and all prior agreements or understandings, written or oral, relating to the matter set forth herein, and any such prior agreements or understanding shall have no force or effect whatever on this Agreement. 17.7 COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS AGREEMENT. This Agreement consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the Agreement as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, RFP #02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services", Consultant's Fee Schedule "A", Insurance Coverage Schedule "B", Truth in Negotiation Schedule "C". ARTICLE EIGHTEEN APPLICABLE LAW 18.1. Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the laws, rules, and regulations of the State of Florida, and by such laws, rules and regulations of the United States as made applicable to when providing services funded by the United States government. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate Florida state court in Collier County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Professional Services Agreement for Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services the day and year first written above. -2.0- COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA ,.l~-r~s ~. Coletta, Cha'~man TBE Group, Inc. Witnessed: (Type oCime):. Joan M. Rice ~3¢~p~~~d q e (Type name): Richard T. Doyle, AICP. (Title): Senior Vice President PE (CORPORATE SEAL) -21- SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE A Collier County Standard Fee Schedule RFP 02-3371 "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services" Professional Credentials Principal P.E. $150.00/hr Project Manager P.E. $100.00/hr Senior Planner/Engineer A.T.C.P. or P.E. $100.00/hr Planner/Engineer A.T.C.P. or P.E. $90.00/hr Senior Technician $55.00/hr Technician $45.00/hr Suooort Administrative Assistant, Secretary $45.00/hr Clerical, other support $35.00/hr 16El This list is not intended to be all-inclusive. The County and firm on a project-by-project basis as needed shall mutually negotiate hourly rate fees for other categories of professional, support and other services. END OF SCHEDULE A -22- SCHEDULE B INSURANCE COVERAGE 16El (1) The amounts and types of insurance coverage shall conform to the following minimum requirements with the use of Insurance Services Office (ISO) forms and endorsements or their equivalents. WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Insurance shall be maintained by the ContractodConsultant/Professional during the term of this Agreement for all employees engaged in the work under this Agreement in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The amounts of such insurance shall not be less than: a. Worker's Compensation - Florida Statutory Requirements b. Employers' Liability (check one) X $100,000 Each Accident $500,000 Disease Aggregate $100,000 Disease Each Employee (2) The insurance company shall waive its Rights of Subrogation against the Owner and the policy shall be so endorsed. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Insurance shall be maintained by the Contractor/Consultant/Professional. Coverage will include, but not be limited to, Bodily Injury, Property Damage, Personal Injury, Contractual Liability for this Agreement, Independent Contractors, Broad Form Property Damage including Completed Operations and Products and Completed Operations Coverage. Products and Completed Operations coverage shall be maintained for a period of not less than five (5) years following the completion and acceptance -23- by the Owner of the work under this Agreement. following: (check one) X General Aggregate Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Personal and Advertising Injury Each Occurrence Fire Damage Limits of Liability shall not be less than the $1,000,000 SI,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,ooo,ooo $ 5o,ooo (2) The General Aggregate Limit shall apply separately to this Project and the policy shall be endorsed using the following endorsement wording. "This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: Commercial General Liability Coverage Part. The General Aggregate Limit under LIMITS OF INSURANCE applies separately to each of your projects away from premises owned by or rented to you." (3) If the General Liability insurance required herein is issued or renewed on a "claims made" basis, as opposed to the "occurrence" form, the retroactive date for coverage shall be no later than the commencement date of the Project and shall provide that in the event of cancellation or non-renewal the Extended Reporting Period (Discovery Period) for claims shall be no less than three (3) years. (4) The Owner shall be named as an Additional Insured and the policy shall be endorsed that such coverage shall be primary to any similar coverage carried by the Owner. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE shall be maintained by the Contractor / Consultant / Professional for the ownership, maintenance or use of any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle with limits of not less than: (check one) X Bodily Injury & Property Damage - $ 500,000 PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE shall be maintained by the Consultant/Professional to insure its legal liability for claims arising out of the performance of professional services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall have limits of not less than X $1,000,000 each claim and in the aggregate -24- (2) Any deductible applicable to any claim shall be the sole Consultant/Professional and shall not be greater than $50,000 each claim. responsib the (3) The Consultant/Professional shall continue this coverage for this Project for a period of not less than five (5) years following completion and acceptance of the Project by the Owner. END OF SCHEDULE B. c,ie.=:3103 TAMP.AY3 '1 /-- E 1 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE j- U &E,M. O 10101102 PRODUCER Suncoast Insurance Associates P.O. Box 22668 Tampa, FL 33622-2668 813 289-5200 INSURED TBE Group, Inc. 380 Park Place Blvd, Suite 300 Clearwater, FL 33759 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURERA: United States Fidelity & Guaranty INSURER B: American Manufacturers Mutual Ins ~NSURERC: Security Ins of Hartford INSURER D: INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FORTHEPOLICYPERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. IN~R POLICY' EFFECTIVE POUCY EXPIRATION LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POUCY NUMBER DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE ¢IIIMtODfYY) UMITS A GENERAL UAmLm' BK01158348 06130102 06/30103 EACH OCCURRENCE ' X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY FIRE DAMAGE (Any onefire) $1,000,000 CLAIMSMADE I X J OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $10,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUC'I'S - COMPIOP AG G $2,000,000 POLICY JECT LOC A AUTO.Om. ~ UAS..n~ BA01158301 06/30/02 06130103 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT X ANY AUTO (La accident) $1,000,000 ALL OWNED AUTOS -- BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) $ X HIRED AUTOS -- BODILY INJURY X~ NON-OWNED AUTOS i (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE ! (Per accident) $ ~ GARAGE UABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT$ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC AUTO ONLY: AGG $ A EXCESS UAS,,rrY BK01158348 06130102 06130103 EAC~ OCCUR~NCE $7,000,000 X OCCUR I ICLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ $ B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND ?CQ61261203 05101102 05101103 XToRyWC STATU-uMiTS r OTH-ER EMPLOYERS' MABILITY E.L. EACH ACCIDENT ' $1,000,000 E.L DISEASE - EA EMPL OYEI $1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 C OTHER PL515/// 06130102 06/30103 $5,000,000 Each Claim Professional $5,000,000 Ann Aggr Liability DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUaONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS Professional Liability is written on a claims made basis. RE: Contract 02-3371; "Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services" 'The Certificate Holder is also Additional Insured with respects to the General Liability, Automobile Liability and Excess Liability policies. C~.KI I~'ICATE HOLDER I I ADDITIONALINSURED;INSURERLETrER: CANCELLATION Collier County Board of County Commissioners 330t East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 SHOULD/t-NY OF ~ E ABOVE D ESCRJBED POLICIES B E CANCELLED BEFORE TH E EX~I RATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WlLL]~MAIL30 DAYSWRITTEN NONCE TO TH E CERTIFICATE HOLD ER NAMED TO TH E LEFT, ~UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MDL e ACORD CORPORATION 1988 ACORD 25-S (7/97) 1 of 2 #S664201M63116 IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. A statement on this certificate does not confer dghts to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. ACORD25-S(7/97)2 of 2 #S66420/M63116 SCHEDULE C TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE 16El In compliance with the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act, Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, TBE Group, Inc. hereby certifies that wages, rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation for the Fixed Term Professional Transportation Planning Consulting Services of the CONSULTANT to be provided under the Professional Services Agreement are accurate, complete and current as of the time of contracting. BY: ////~/~//¢¢, o~___ Richard T. Boy]e, AICP, PE Senior Vice President DATE: / ~~"~o0 ~ -26- 16E DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF DECEMBER 13, 2002 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF DECEMBER 13, 2002 Community Health Partners- 16E Letter of Agreement between Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida and Naples Physician Hospital Organization, Inc. ~e~althis Letter of Agreement dated ~)o9~. / ~ , 2002, and is effective as of /t 2'~t~t by and between Naples Physician Hospital Organization, Inc. d/b/a Community Partners,'a Florida Corporation ("CHP"), and the Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida. The purpose of this Letter of Agreement is to set forth a timeframe for Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida and CHP to articulate and document the parameters and intent of the parties to work together to obtain a mutually acceptable risk share program and formula to be completed within ninety (90) days from the effective date of this Letter of Agreement. The Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida and Community Health Partners shall actively participate in a review board and work toward creating the equitable methods to measure outcomes of the CHP utilization strategies that have an impact on medical costs. Agreement Community Health Partners agrees to: 1. Establish and chair a Review Board composed of physicians, hospital, Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida, other government entities representatives and Willis representatives to identify and implement utilization strategies that will have an impact on medical costs. 2. Provide input and assistance in working toward the goals articulated in this Letter of Agreement. 3. Maintain the fee schedule that was implemented on August 1,2001. 4. Actively participate to obtain a mutually acceptable risk share program and formula to be implemented ninety (90) days from the effective date of this Letter of Agreement. 5. CHP will work with Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida to identify the factors that are driving the cost of medical claims and work to develop initiatives designed to address those factors that will improve the quality and consistency of medical care while at the same time reducing the overall cost of care. CHP shall take steps to educate its member providers regarding these programs and compliance with them. CHP will monitor provider compliance with the terms of this contract and the initiatives that result from it. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida agrees to: 1. Maintain current contract with CHP in effect. 2. Cause their TPA to release claims and utilization information to CHP and Willis. 3. Actively participate with CHP in the Review Board. 4. Actively participate to obtain a mutually acceptable risk share program and implemented ninety (90) days from the effective date of this Letter of Agreement. formula to be Community Health Partners- Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida and CHP agree to continue the agreement and negotiate in good faith to maintain an exclusive agreement. Term This Letter of Agreement shall terminate ninety (90) days from the effective date above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Letter Agreement to be duly executed as of this /~::~ dayof ~P~~,200~. A~EST: 'Dwight F. Brocl~'Clerk of Courts f- f-,:;.x..~.:&:..;,,: .:.. -. .. -. signature onll. Seal: First Witness BOARD OF COUNTY/COMMIS~SION~RS COLLIER COUNTY, FL~ By: //'~ - :' - -~ '- Print Names and Title NAPLES PHYSICIAN HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION, INC. d/b/a COMM~IT~Y HEALTH PARTNERS A1Fen"S. Wmss, M.D., Chairman Second Witness Approved as to form and legal sufficienfy~: ~ ~Assistaht County(A~t~,rne)' - [' " Print Names CORPORATE SEAL (Corporations only) 1SE NAPLES PHYSICIAN HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION, INC. COLLATERAL NETWORK AGREEMENT This COLLATERAL NETWORK AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") effective as of the /~" day of ~ , 20(1~, (the "Effective Date"), is entered into, by and between Naples Physician Hosp~ta~Organlzatlon, Inc. d/b/a Community Health Partners ("CHP") and Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida, ("Payor"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Community Health Panners has as its primary objective arranging for the delivery or provision of certain health services through a cost effective, coordinated, and integrated health care delivery system. WHEREAS, Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida has adopted a self-insured employee benefit plan for the provision of health care benefits to Plan Members; WHEREAS, Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida, a self-insured employer, is ultimately responsible for payment of health care benefits in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida desires to increase control over the cost of providing health care benefits to Plan Members and enters into this Agreement to arrange for CHP to contract with a Collateral Network. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I PROVISION OF SERVICES 1.1 Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida hereby appoints Community Health Panners as Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida's duly appointed agent with the power and authority to enter into and execute Collateral Network Payor Agreement on behalf of Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida to access Collateral Network for it's enrollees outside of local CHP service area. 1.2 Community Health Panners shall maintain a National Collateral Network Payor Agreement. 1.3 Community Health Panners shall notify Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida of any changes to the National Collateral Network Payor Agreement. 1.4 Community Health Panners shall notify Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida and Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida's claim administrator of the name of the Collateral Network. Page 1 06/19/02 16E 1.5 Community Health Parmers shall provide no less then ninety (90) days written notice of the termination of any Collateral Network Agreement that provides access to Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida enrollees outside of CHP's service area. 1.6 Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida shall provide CHP sixty (60) days written notice of termination of this Collateral Network Agreement. 1.7 Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida shall pay CHP the fees listed on Schedule 1.7 as compensation for CHP providing Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida access to a Collateral Network. Fees are dependent on the charges accessed by the Collateral Network to CHP and may be adjusted without amendment to this contract. CHP shall provide ninety (90) day prior written notice to Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida of any fee adjustments. ARTICILE II TERM AND TERMINATION 2.1 Term. The initial term of the Agreement shall be from January 1, 0~nd shall automatically renew for successive one (1) year terms thereafter unless either party gives the other notice of it intention not to renew at least ninety ( 90 ) days prior to the annual anniversary of the Effective Date. 2.2 Automatic Termination. This Agreement shall automatically terminate as of the effective date of termination of Payor's Benefit Programs if no other successor or substitute self-insured plan is adopted by Payor. Payor shall provide CHP written notice no less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of termination of each Benefit Program covered under this Agreement. 2.3 Termination Without Cause. This Agreement may be terminated by either party with ninety (90) days written notice to the other party. Page 2 06/19/02 16E IN WITNESS WHEREOF,.the parties have caused this Letter Agreement to be duly executed as of this / ~ day of ~~l~.~, 2001, ATTEST: Dwight F. Brock, Clerk of Courts First Witness BOARD OF COUNT~,/COMMJ~SIO. J~ERS ~OLLIER COUNTY, FLO~ By: ///""- ' '-' - -v - Print Names and Title NAPLES PHYSICIAN HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION, INC. d/b/a COMMthNITY HEALTH PARTNERS Alle.~<~: Wv~eisg/,, M.D., Chairman Second Witness App?ved as to form and. legal sufficiency:/ ~ A~l'siant Couniy Attorney [/- - Print Names CORPORATE SEAL (Corporations only) Page 3 06/19/02 SCHEDULE 1.7 NATIONAL COLLATERAL NETWORK FEES Payor shall pay Community Health Partners monthly the fees listed below as indicated for Access to a Collateral Network. The fee(s) shall be received by Community Health Partners by the 20th of each month. Fees to be disbursed to: Community Health Partners 408 Goodlette Road S. Naples, FL 34102 Please indicate choice of Florida only or National Access: __ Collateral Network for State of Florida only Access Fee .............................. $0.95 PEPM* (per employee per month) Collateral Network for Nationwide includes Florida Access Fee ..................... $4.00 PEPM* (per employee per month) *This access fee is subject to change without amendment to the Agreement. Page 4 06/19/02 NAPLES PHYSICIAN HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION, INC. MANAGED CARE SERVICE AGREEMENT 16E 4 This MANAGED CARE SERVICE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") effective as of the day of ~, 20C~, (the "Effective Date"), is entered into by and between Naples Physician Hospital-Organizatibn, Inc. d/b/a Community Health Partners ("CHP") and Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida, ("Payor"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Community Health Partners has as its primary objective arranging for the delivery or provision of certain Managed Care Services and Utilization Review Services through a cost effective, coordinated, and integrated health care delivery system. WHEREAS, Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida has adopted a self-insured employee benefit plan for the provision of Health Care Benefits, Managed Care Program and Utilization Review Program to Plan Members; WHEREAS, Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida a self-insured employer, is ultimately responsible for payment of Health Care Benefits, Managed Care Program and Utilization Review Program in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida desires to increase control over the cost of providing Health Care Benefits to Plan Members and enters into this Managed Care Agreement to arrange for CHP, through CHP Providers, to render Managed Care Program(s) to Plan Members in conjunction with Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida's various Benefit Programs. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meaning ascribed thereto: 1.1 Agreement. This Managed Care Agreement. 1.2 Benefit Program. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida's self insured employee benefit plans covered under this Agreement as listed on Schedule 1.2, as amended from time to time. 1.3 Medical Emergency. The sudden onset of a medical condition manifesting itself by acute symptoms of sufficient severity which, if not immediately diagnosed and treated, could reasonably be expected to result in serious physical impairment to a bodily function, or serious and permanent dysfunction of any body, organ or body part, or to cause other serious medical consequences which include placing a Plan Member's health in permanent jeopardy. Page 1 08/07/02 16E 4 1.4 CHP Hospital. Naples Community Hospital and North Collier Hospital which have contracted as independent contractors with CHP to provide certain Health Benefit Plan to Plan Members. 1.5 CHP CHP Physician. A physician who has contracted as an independent contractor with 1.6 CHP Provider. A CHP Physician, CHP Hospital, and any licensed health care facility or professional, who or which has entered into a written agreement with CHP. 1.7 Plan Benefits. Those inpatient and outpatient services that are ordered for Plan Members by physicians and other licensed health care providers, covered under a Benefit Program 1.8 Plan Member. Any person who has elected to receive health care benefits from or through Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida's Benefit Program and who is eligible to receive Plan Benefits under the Utilization Review or Managed Care portion of the Benefit Program included in this Agreement. ARTICLE II PROVISION OF SERVICES 2.1 UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Community Health Partners' Utilization Management Program shall use nationally recognized guidelines to determine the appropriateness of medical services as well as the delivery setting and length of stay for inpatient hospital and outpatient services. The appropriateness guidelines have been developed to create practice pathways that integrate with procedures that require Precertificiation. Community Health Partners will be responsible for: Maintain a local telephone line and an out of area toll free telephone line for enrollees of the Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida's Benefit Plan to call for Precertificiation of defined procedures and medical services, This may include non-emergent inpatient hospital confinements, outpatient hospital services, surgeries, diagnosis testing and or medical procedures. Utilization Management service will be available during standard business days, Monday through Friday 8:00 am through 5:00 pm. Voice mail messaging will be available during non-business hours, and calls will be returned on the next business day. Respond to Utilization Management requests for the medical services within 24 hours of the request verbally when all necessary medical information and eligibility status is provided. Written confirmation of the decision will be mailed within the next business day of the decision. · Provide retrospective process of emergent admissions. · Perform concurrent review and assist with discharge planning, · Provide Precertificiation forms. Page 2 08/07/02 16E · Assist the Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida to determine the medical services and procedures that are to be included in the Utilization Management Program. · Provide analysis and reports of the Utilization Management Program. Standard reporting of authorizations and Denials by CPT codes. · Provide Precertification information to Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Floridas claim administrator via email or fax. CHP will coordinate with claim administrator the assignment of authorization numbers. · Follow CHP Grievance Procedure process that does not include medical services excluded by the benefit plan. · Provide Nurse and Physician review as necessary. · Provide Pharmacy over rides and Pharmacy utilization reports. · Provide basic Case Management. · Provide basic Benefit Verification and Eligibility Information. · Precertification process will not include any medical services requested or begun prior to the effective date of this Agreement. CHP will not handle overlap Precertificiation processing. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida will be responsible for: · Provide written notification to their Benefit Plan enrollees of the Utilization Management Program and the requirements of this program. · Provide up to date enrollment eligibility information to CHP online. · Assist CHP with the integration of the Utilization Management Program with the Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida's claim administrator. · Distribute the Precertificiation forms as necessary to enrollees. 2.2 SMARTCHOICE PROGRAM (Large Case Management) Community Health Partners will be responsible for: Disease Management portion of this Program · Assist with notification to members reminding them to utilize their Preventative Benefits and call for free telephonic assessment to determine entry to Smartchoice. · Provide telephonic entry assessment to determine eligibility for Smartchoice program. Page 3 08/07/02 16E · Determine inappropriate Emergency Room utilization of members that have had (3) or more emergency room visits per calendar year. The ICD-9 codes will be reviewed, and members with inappropriate ER use will be contacted by the case manager. The case manager will encourage the member to establish with a participating Primary Care Physician. · Provide Disease Management for the following diagnoses: Coronary Vascular Disease, Asthma, Diabetes and Life Style Management. · Member will be discharged from the Smart Choice Disease Management program when goals are met. · CHP will provide anonymous cost savings report to the Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida. · A maximum of (60) members at a time will be enrolled in the Disease Management portion of this program. Large Case Management portion of this Program: · Case managing catastrophic chronic and acute illness. · Case manage transplants, inclusive of negotiating rates, all authorizations, working with in-house case management with discharge planning, i.e. home health, DME, Rehab services, etc. · The Smartchoice Case Manager will use claims data to determine which members can most benefit from the program. Members will be selected by high cost and high complexity diagnoses. Need for out-of-network services will also be a factor. · The Smartchoice Case Manager will attempt to negotiate rates for all services not available within the CHP network, or the employer's national network. This service will be provided only with the written approval of the employer's reinsurer when applicable. Maximum of twenty (20) members can be enrolled into the Large Case Management Program at one time. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida will be responsible for: Encouraging their enrollees to participate in the Smartchoice Program. Assist with the notification to employees about the Smartchoice Program. Provide Preventative Benefits to help identify potential health problems early. Provide claims data to the Smartchoice program as described below. Page 4 08/07/02 While the exact format outlined below is not required, the elements listed are required. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida shall produce and send to CHP quarterly. Reports including the following information from claims submitted by CHP preferred providers: Provider Name Provider Tax ID Patient Date of Patient Sex (M/F) Primary Procedure Birth Code (CPT) Secondary Dx Code (ICD9) Dx Code (ICD9) Dx Code (ICD9) Date of Service Procedure Code Primary Secondary Third Mm/dd/yy (CPT) Charge Amount Negotiated Paid Amount Allowable Amount These reports should be sent on 3 1/2" diskette in excel format or may be emailed to the Smartchoice Case Manager. Please include the field layout legend and indicate if files have been "zipped". 2.3 ACCESS HEALTHLINE PROGRAM The Access Healthline Program is a call center administered by Community Health Partners' Registered Nurses that provides Triage Service to the Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida's Benefit Plan enrollees. This Triage Service gives enrollees the opportunity to call, give short medical history, and a description of a medical problem that they, or a covered member of their family, are experiencing. The Registered type of medical facility and time frame Nurse will use medical algorithms to determine the best necessary to deal with that medical problem. Community Health Partners will be responsible for: · Provide Physician and Medical Service referrals to enrollees. · Provide information on health related topics. · Registered Nurse available to enrollees 24 hours daily, 7 days a week, 365 days annually. · Assist with appropriate utilization of emergency room care. · Provide education and resources to enrollees and their families regarding their medical questions. · Provide an exclusive telephone number for enrollees to call for Referral or Triage Service. · Provide information to the Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida about the Access Healthline Program for their enrollees. · Attend annual benefit fair offered to enrollees by the Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida to explain the Access Healthline program. Page 5 08/07/02 16E Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida will be responsible for: Distribute information about the Access Healthline and exclusive telephone number to their enrollees. 2.4 Board of County Commissioners Collier County., Florida Representations and Warranties. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida represents and warrants that the terms of this Agreement do not conflict with any other agreements, whether written or oral, between Board of County Conmnissioners Collier County, Florida and any other third person or entity. For purposes of CHP Providers compliance with Rule 4-153, Florida Administrative Code, Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida represents and warrants that its Benefit Programs arc completely and fully self-insured, except for any reinsurance or similar form of stop-loss insurance. 2.5 Grievances. Any complaints received by Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida or its claims administrator with respect to the provision of the Managed Care Program by CHP shall be forwarded to CHP and shall be submitted for resolution in accordance with the CHP's then current patient grievance resolution procedures as the same may be in effect from time to time. 2.6 Force Majeure. Neither CHP nor any CHP Provider shall be liable nor deemed to be in default for any delay or failure in performance under this Agreement or other interruption of service or employment deemed resulting, directly or indirectly, from Acts of God, civil or military authority, acts of public enemy, war, accidents, fires, explosions, employee strikes or work interruptions, earthquakes, floods, hurricane, failure of transportation or any similar or dissimilar cause beyond the reasonable control of such party. 2.7 Managed Care and Utilization Review Requirements. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida shall provide CHP copies of the Utilization Review and Managed Care requirements, Schedule 2.6 and other conditions to be followed by CHP and Plan Members with respect to providing Managed Care Services under a particular Benefit Program. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and such policies the Plan Benefits shall govern if the Plan Benefits address the specific conflict and if not the terms of this Agreement shall govern provided, however that in no event shall this Agreement amend the Benefit Program. 2.8 Review Board. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida and CHP shall actively participate in a review board and work toward creating equitable methods to measure outcomes of the CHP Managed Care Programs and utilization strategies that have an impact on medical costs. 2.9 Notification of Claims Payment Administrator. Upon execution of this Agreement, Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida shall provide CHP with written notification of its designated third party administrator, if any, and shall thereafter provide CHP with written advance notice ninety (90) days prior to any changes. 2.10 Program Fees. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida shall choose the Managed Care Program(s) and pay CHP the fees for each program chosen as listed on Schedule 4.7 as compensation for each Managed Care Program CHP provides. Page 6 08/07/02 16E ARTICLE III TERM AND TERMINATION 3.1 Term. The initial term of the Agreement shall be for three (3) years, from ,'fan_ 1 ,2fl133_to~ ,2006 and shall automatically renew for successive one (1) year terms unless either party gives the other notice of it intention not to renew at least ninety ( 90 ) days prior to the annual anniversary of the Effective Date after the initial term of this Agreement. 3.2 Termination With Cause. If either party materially breaches this Agreement (the "Breaching Party") the other party (the "Non-Breaching Party") shall have the right to give the Breaching Party written notice of the alleged breach and the Breaching Party shall have thirty (30) days following receipt of such notice to cure the breach to the reasonable satisfaction of the Non-Breaching Party. If the breach is not cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the Non-Breaching Party within the thirty (30) day period the Non-Breaching Party shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement. 3.3 Obligations After Termination; Continuation of Care. Termination of the Agreement shall not affect the rights, obligations and liabilities of the parties arising out of transactions occurring prior to termination. Termination of this Agreement shall be without the consent of or notice to any Plan Member or any other third party. Upon the termination of this Agreement for any reason or cause, CHP shall cooperate with Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida by taking reasonable and medically appropriate measures to assure the assumption of Managed Care Services to Plan Members. CHP shall be compensated for such services in accordance with the terms of this agreement. CHP shall furnish any information and take any action including, without limitation, continuing to provide Managed Care Services, for up to thirty (30) days, as Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida may reasonably request in order to effectuate an orderly and systematic termination of CHP duties and activities under this Agreement and the transfer of obligations. ARTICLE IV GENERAL PROVISIONS 4.1 Relationship of Parties. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida and CHP acknowledge that CHP is an independent contractor. 4.2 Recitals. Each of the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into and made part of this Agreement by reference. 4.3 Limitation of Assignment. This Agreement shall not be assigned by either party without the prior express written consent of the other party. 4.4 Binding on Successors in Interest. To the extent permitted by this Agreement, the provisions of, and obligations arising under, this Agreement shall extend to, be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of CHP and Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida. 4.5 Severability; Changes in Law. If any part of this Agreement is determined to be invalid, illegal, inoperative or contrary to law or professional ethics, the part shall be reformed, if Page 7 08/07/02 16E possible, to conform to law and ethics; the remaining parts of this Agreement shall be fully effective and operative to the extent reasonably possible. If any restriction contained in this Agreement is held by any court to be unenforceable and unreasonable, a lesser restriction shall be enforced in its place and the remaining restrictions shall be enforced independently of each other. 4.6 Conformance With Law. Each party agrees to carry out all activities undertaken by it pursuant to this Agreement in conformance of all applicable federal, Florida and local laws, rules and regulations. 4.7 Time of the Essence. Time shall be of the essence with respect to each and every term, covenant, and condition of this Agreement. 4.8 Attorney Fees. In the event of any action, dispute, litigation or other proceeding relating to or in connection with this Agreement, each party shall be responsible for their own fees, costs, and expenses of counsel incurred in connection with that action, dispute, litigation or other proceeding. 4.9 Entire Agreement/Amendments. This Agreement supersedes all previous Managed Care Service contracts and constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. Oral statements or prior written materials not specifically incorporated in this Agreement shall not be of any force and effect. In entering into and executing this Agreement, the parties rely solely upon the representations and agreements contained in this Agreement. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement to the contrary, no changes in or additions to this Agreement shall be recognized unless and until made in writing and signed by an authorized officer or agent of CHP and Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida. 4.10 Governing Law. This Agreement has been executed and delivered and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida excluding and without application of any choice of law principles except to the extent pre emptied by federal law. Any action brought by the parties whether at law or in equity shall be commenced and maintained and venue shall properly be in Collier County, Florida. The parties knowingly, intentionally and irrevocable waive any claim that any suit, action or proceeding brought in Collier County, Florida has been brought in an inconvenient forum. Each party further waives all rights to any trial by jury in all litigation relating to or arising out of this Agreement. 4.11 Waiver of Breach. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed waived unless evidenced by a written document signed by an authorized officer or agent of CHP and Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida. The waiver by either party of a breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement shall not operate as, or be construed to be, a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or other provision of this Agreement unless specifically provided for in the written instrument consenting to the waiver. 4.12 Paragraph and Other Headings. The section and other headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 4.13 Gender and Number. When the context of this Agreement requires, the gender of all words shall include the masculine, feminine, and neuter, and the number of all words shall include the singular and plural. Page 8 08/07/02 1_6E 4 4.14 Execution. This Agreement and any amendments may be executed in multiple originals, each counterpart shall be deemed an original, but all counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 4.15 Additional Assurances. The provisions of this Agreement are self-operative and do not require further agreement by the parties; provided, however, at the request of either party, the other shall execute, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any additional instruments and take any additional acts as may be reasonably necessary to effectuate this Agreement. 4.16 Construction. This Agreement shall be construed without regard to any presumption or other rule requiring construction against the party causing this Agreement to be drafted. 4.17 Authority. Each signatory to this Agreement represents and warrants that he possesses all necessary capacity and authority to act for, sign, and bind the respective entity on whose behalf he is signing. 4.18 Notice. Any notice given pursuant or relating to this Agreement shall be given by United States mail, postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, hand delivery, or overnight delivery, and delivered to the addressee at the following address unless otherwise changed in accordance with the provisions of this Section: To Community Health Partners: 408 Goodlette Road South Naples, Florida 34102 Attn: Contracting Dept. To Board of County Commissioners Collier County Florida 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 4.19 Cumulative Remedies. Remedies provided for in this Agreement shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any other remedies available to either party and shall not be deemed waivers or substitutions for any action or remedy the parties may have under law or in equity. 4.20 Marketing and Promotion. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida and CHP each reserve the right to and control of its name, symbols, trademarks, logos and service marks presently existing or established in the future. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida agrees that CHP may use its name in any publication listing the names of managed care programs and health benefit plans with which CHP contracts. Except as provided in this Section, the use of any written promotional documents, publicity, media advertising, or any other materials for public disclosure carrying the name, trademark, service mark, or a pictorial likeness of either party shall require the prior written consent of the other party. 4.21 ConfidentialiW. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida and CHP shall take all reasonable precautions to maintain the confidentiality of this Agreement and any related information provided to or discovered and shall not disclose this Agreement, the terms thereof, or such other information to any party other than a party directly involved in the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. 4.22 Coordination of Defense of Claims. Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida and CHP shall promptly notify the other of any claims or demands asserted by third parties that arise under or related to this Agreement. The parties shall make all reasonable efforts, consistent with advice of counsel and the requirements of the respective insurance policies and carriers, to coordinate Page 9 08/07/02 16E and assist in the defense of all claims in which the other party is either a named defendant or has a substantial possibility of being named. This Section shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement. 4.23 Compliance with Laws and Regulation. In the event any applicable federal, state, or local law or any regulation, order or policy issued under such law is changed (or any judicial interpretation thereof is developed or changed) in a way which will have a material adverse effect on the practical realization of the benefits anticipated by one or both parties to this Agreement, the adversely affected party shall notify the other party in writing of such change and the effect of the change. The parties shall enter into good faith negotiations to modify this Agreement to compensate for such change. If an agreement is not reached within 30 days of such written notice; the Agreement may be terminated by either party. Page 10 08/07/'02 (,~ Community Health Partners- 16E 4 IN WITNESS WItEREOF, the, parties hav.e caused this Letter of Agreement to be duly executed as of this/~;l~itay of "~.~/~d, 2002. First Witness BOARD OF COUNTy,~OMMI~IOb3~RS COLLIER COUN~ By: Print Name and Title NAPLES PHYSICIAN HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION, INC. dPo/a COMMUNITY HEALTH Alle~eis~; MD, Chairman Second Witness Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: -eh4xvf As~fstant County Attorney It- v' Print Name CORPORATE SEAL (Corporations only) SCHEDULE 2.6 UTILIZATION REVIEW PROGRAM 16E To be attached here. Page 12 08/O7/O2 SCHEDULE 4.7 PROGRAM FEES 16E Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida shall pay Community Health Partners monthly the fees listed below for the Managed Care Programs that are indicated as purchased. The fee(s) shall be received by Community Health Partners by the 20th of each month. Fees to be disbursed to: Community Health Partners 408 Goodlette Road S. Naples, FL 34102 Check off the appropriate Managed Care Programs being purchased: CHP Utilization Management Program Standalone $2.46 PEPM CHP Utilization Management Program with Large Case Management and Disease Management Package includes 20 Lg. Case Mgmt. Cases and 60 Disease Mgmt. Cases unless otherwise specified. $3.39 PEPM 24 hour Access Utilization Management Nurse Add'l $1.50 PEPM SmartChoice Standalone - Large Case Management and Disease Management Package includes 20 Lg. Case Mgmt Cases and 60 Disease Mgmt. Cases unless otherwise specified. $98,400 Annually Access Healthline $1.29 PEPM Minimum 1000 employees Page 13 08/07/02 Community Health Partners- 16E WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROVIDER NETWORK EMPLOYER/PAYOR AGREEMENT This Agreement to participate in Naples PHO's WorkCare program entered into as of '~ 2..a~,~ ("Effective Date") by and between Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government. ("Payor"), and the WorkCare program of the Naples Physician Hospital Organization, Inc. d/b/a Community Health Partners ("WorkCare"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Community Health Partners has developed a Workers Compensation Managed Care Arrangement Plan pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 440, which provides a comprehensive network of services for the treatment of employees of payors protected by the Florida Workers' Compensation Laws who have accidental injuries and occupational diseases arising out of and in the course of employment (hereinafter referred to as the "WorkCare Program"); and WHEREAS, The WorkCare Program provides comprehensive services and information gathering for occupational injuries and diseases which may occur in the course of employment at Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government; and WHEREAS, Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government has arranged for a workers' compensation insurance plan and desires to enter into this agreement to participate in the WorkCare Program; and WHEREAS, WorkCare, a division of Community Health Partners, arranges cost- effective hospital, physician, and other health care provider services and certain other services designed to control the overall costs of work-related injuries and illnesses; and WHEREAS, Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government desires assistance in the management of worker injuries and illnesses and desires access to a network of health care providers for the purpose of controlling workers' compensation costs; and WHEREAS, Community Health Partners has offered Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government the opportunity to participate in the WorkCare Program and Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government has elected to accept the services of the WorkCare Program; and 16F NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants herein contained, it is mutually agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Definitions. For the purposes of this agreement the following terms have the ascribed meanings: 1.1 "Beneficiary" - means any person receiving health care services for which a Payor is under a legal obligation to pay or indemnify for the cost of such services provided under the WorkCare program. 1.2 "Case Management" - means to plan, organize, coordinate, and monitor a Beneficiary's progress while in the WorkCare Program. 1.3 "Covered Services" - means services provided to a Beneficiary when such services are authorized for payment in accordance with the Payor's workers' compensation program. 1.4 "Fee Schedule" - means the schedule of fees charged for the provision of Covered Services. 1.5 "Participating Provider" - means any duly licensed hospital, physician, skilled nursing facility, or other health care provider of inpatient or outpatient services which has entered into a contract with the Community Health Partners to participate in WorkCare. 1.6 "Payor" means either (1) an employer with the responsibility for providing health benefits to its workers for work related injuries and illnesses; or, (2) a third party who administers such health benefits on behalf of an employer; 1.7 "Provider Directory" - means the listing of all Participating Providers including type of service provided, address, phone number, and hours of operation. 1.8 "Tracking Report" - means the report utilized by employer to initiate and authorize treatment and by WorkCare and Participating Providers to document care of referred worker. 2. Responsibilities of WorkCare. In addition to any other obligations set forth in other sections of this Agreement, the WorkCare Program within Community Health Partners shall: a. Provide injured workers access to CHP Participating Providers who participate in the WorkCare Program. b. Provide a comprehensive network of Participating Providers to begin treatment process within two hours for acute illnesses and injuries and within one (1) working day 16E 4 for all chronic conditions for Beneficiaries referred by their employer for work-related injury or illness. c. Provide employer a template, for printing, of Tracking Report forms and instruction on the use. d. Provide Payor or Payor's workers' compensation claim administrator with verification, either verbal or written, of a beneficiary's work-related injury or illness within twenty-four hours of the beneficiary's evaluation and notification by a participating provider. e. Provide Payor or Payor's workers' compensation claim administrator with completed Tracking Reports within twenty-four hours of receipt from Participating Provider. f. Provide Case Management services on call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. g. Provide Payor or Payor's workers' compensation claim administrator WorkCare Participating Provider fee schedule for all services provided by the WorkCare Participating Providers and updated fee schedules, as necessary. h. Provide Payor or Payor's workers' compensation claim administrator WorkCare Participating Provider demographic information and update with any adds, changes or terminations monthly. i. Provide Payor or Payor's workers' compensation claim administrator with progress and status reports for, rehabilitation services only, every two weeks on beneficiaries receiving treatment from rehabilitation participating providers, j. Assist Payor with training their management personnel with respect to participating in the WorkCare Program. k. Case Manager will authorize all non-emergent medical care and provide documentation of authorizations. 1. Notify employer or payor when there is a question of compensability for a reported injury. m. Provide local case management services by a registered nurse case manager for up to one (1) year from date of injury or date of surgery. Refer to Exhibit 4.1 of the Agreement for cost to provide case management after one (1) year. n. Case management for injured workers who relocate out of the local services area may be requested by the employer. Refer to Schedule 4.7 of the Agreement for cost to provide case management for injured workers who relocate out of the local services area. 16E 4 Provide pre-certification utilizing Interqual criteria for all tests, procedures and surgeries with expected cost greater than $1000.00 o. Provide file reviews with case manager and employer/payor as necessary. 3. Responsibilities of Payor. In addition to any other obligations set forth in other sections of this Agreement, the Payor shall: a. Use its best efforts to assure that employees utilize the WorkCare program and protocols. b. Use best efforts to assure that management initiates Tracking Reports for employee injuries or illnesses and sends Tracking Report with employee to treatment location. c. Use best efforts to assure that WorkCare is contacted within twenty-four hours of beneficiary injury or initial onset of illness. d. Participate in appropriate WorkCare program training. e. Find modified duty positions for beneficiaries receiving treatment when appropriate. f. Make payment to Participating Providers for medical services rendered within forty fine (45) days of receipt of claims at the WorkCare fee schedule rates. f. Upon request, provide WorkCare within a reasonable period, information related to claims paid under the employer's workers' compensation program. h. Verify the enrollment and eligibility status of workers who present to Workcare Participating Providers. i. Compensation: Payor agrees not to disclose the fee schedule information to outside third parties other then their worker's compensation claim administrator. Community Health Partners may revise the WorkCare Fee Schedule from time to time without amendment to this Agreement. Community Health Partners must provide sixty 60 days written notice in advance of any fee schedule adjustment. j. Compliance with Rules and Policies: Payor shall comply with all rules and policies that CHP may from time-to-time develop or amend in connection with the administration of the WorkCare program. CHP shall be responsible for delivering a copy 16E of such rules and policies to the Payor which shall become binding on Payor upon receipt. This change shall not require an amendment to this agreement. 4. Compensation and Program Fees. Payor shall pay to Participating Providers compensation for those Covered Services provide to the Payer's Beneficiaries under the WorkCare Program at a rate of one hundred percent (100%) of the WorkCare Fee Schedule as outlined in Exhibit 4. Payor shall pay Community Health Partners the program fees listed in Exhibit 4.1 as compensation for providing Payor with the WorkCare Program and for access to and use of the Participating Provider network. 5. Compliance with Rules and Policies. Payor shall comply with all rules and policies that WorkCare may from time-to-time develop or amend in connection with the administration of the WorkCare program. WorkCare shall be responsible for delivering a copy of such rules and policies to the Payor which shall become binding on Payor upon receipt. 6. Independent Contractor. This agreement is not intended to create nor shall any provision of this Agreement be deemed or construed to create any relationship between the parties other than that of independent contractors. Neither of the parties to this Agreement, nor any of their respective employees, shall be construed to be the agent, the employer or the representative of the other. 7. Term and Termination. a. Term. The initial term of the Agreement shall be for three (3) years, from ,7anuary 1., ,2D_0_g_to December 31,, 2006and shall automatically renew for successive one (1) year terms unless either party gives the other notice of it intention not to renew at least ninety ( 90 ) days prior to the annual anniversary of the Effective Date after the initial term of this Agreement. b. Obligations after Termination. Following the effective date of termination of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall be of no further force or effect except that each party to this Agreement shall remain liable for any obligations or liabilities arising from activities carried on by such party prior to the effective date of termination. The provisions relating to proprietary information (Section 11) shall survive termination of this Agreement. 8. Material Breach. Either party may terminate this Agreement for "cause" upon thirty (30) days written notice, which notice shall set forth the material breach which gives grounds for the termination. If the material breach continues for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice, the non-breaching party shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement. Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement to the contrary, the Participating Facility shall continue to provide covered services to beneficiaries during the thirty day period. 16E 4 9. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including any amendments, riders, attachments, or appendices contains the entire understanding of the parties and supersedes any prior understandings and agreements between the parties, whether written or oral, respecting the subject matter of this agreement. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written agreement executed by both parties. 10. Waiver of Breach. The waiver by either party of a breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement shall not operate as or be construed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of this Agreement. 11. Proprietary Information. Payor acknowledges that WorkCare has developed certain symbols, trademarks, service marks, designs, data processes, plans, procedures and information, all of which are proprietary information and trade secrets of WorkCare. The information includes, without limitation, materials relating to the utilization review program, compensation mechanisms and any mark or name which incorporates the words "WorkCare" or any variant thereof. Payor shall not use this information without the prior written consent of WorkCare, as applicable. Payor shall cease any and all use of, and shall return to WorkCare all such information immediately upon the termination of this Agreement. 12. Force Majeure. WorkCare shall not be liable nor deemed to be in default for any delay or failure in performance under this Agreement or other interruption of service or employment deemed resulting, directly or indirectly, from Acts of God, civil or military authority, acts of public enemy, war, accidents, fires, explosions, employee strikes or work interruptions, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, failure of transportation or any similar or dissimilar cause beyond its reasonable control. 13. Conformity with Laws. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect. Any suit, action or proceeding with respect to this Agreement shall be brought in the Circuit Court for the twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County Florida. In the event that any party brings an action to enforce its rights under this Agreement then the prevailing party in that action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees. 14. Assignment. Except as otherwise provided in this Section, this Agreement is not transferable or assignable by either party without the prior written consent of the non-assigning party. WorkCare may assign its fights and obligations under the Agreement to any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with Community Health Partners. 15. Section Headings. All section headings contained herein are for convenience of reference only and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provisions of this Agreement. 16. Notices. Any notice or other communication required by this Agreement is to be in writing, and shall be sent by certified mail return receipt requested postage prepaid, hand delivered, or overnight prepaid delivery to the following addresses: Naples Physician Hospital Organization, Inc. d/b/a Community Health Partners 408 Goodlette Rd. Naples, FL 34102 Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government 3301 Tamiami Trail E. Naples, FL 34112 16E 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. ATTEST:C :.. D.wiglit E: Br~;?~lerk of Courts ,'-By:' &~ '.,.'.>'. / A~te'~t~ ~ ~i~an's signature only Board of Coun/~ Commi~ioners Collier Co~~.~~ By: Print Name and Title Date: '~ ~~Ok. First Witness Type/Print Witness Name Second Witness Type/Print Witness Name Naples Physician Hospital Organization, Inc. d/b/a Comm.u/m~ Hea~,,h Part,ners A/t4e'~r~'. Weiss, MD, Chairman Corporate Seal (Corporations only) Approved as to form and legal Suffi.ciency: t (Print Name) Cl~¢f Assistant County Attorney Exhibit 4 COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS WORKERS' COMPENSATION FEE SCHEDULE Hospital Fee Schedule Inpatient and Outpatient Hospital Services will be reimbursed at the Florida State Workers' Compensation fee schedule. Ancillary Facility Fee Schedule All other Ancillary Facility Services will be reimbursed at the Florida State Workers' Compensation fee schedule. Physician Visits - Fee Schedule* All Physicians will be reimbursed according to the Florida State Workers' Compensation fee schedule with the exception to the procedures listed below. These procedures will be reimbursed according to the 2000 Fee amount illustrated. 99201 t iOFFICE/OUTPATIENT VISIT, NEW $48.54i 99203 I OFFICE/OUTPATIENT VISIT, NEW $105.241 99204 i iOFFICE/OUTPATIENT VISIT, NEW $153.26i i99205 i ?OFFICE/OUTPATIENT VISIT, NEW $191.16i 992 ....................................... 11 iOFFICE/OUTPATIENT VISIT, EST 99212 ; OFFICE/OUTPATIENT VISIT, EST $41.93 99213 iOFFICE/OUTPATIENT VISIT, EST ~ $57.501 99215 ~OFFICE/OUTPATIENT VISIT, EST ~ $134.95~ ~99241 ~OFFICE CONSULTATION $70.02 ~99242 ~ ............ ~OFFICE CONSULTATION '~-' ............. ~ ...................... ~'~'~'~i~" ~ ~'~'0~¥'~¥i'~ ............ : $143.30 ;OFFICE CONSULTATION $199.21 All other Physician Services will be reimbursed based on the Florida State Workers' Compensation Fee Schedule. EXHIBIT 4.1 WORKCARE PROGRAM FEES Payor shall pay Community Health Partners monthly the fees listed below for WorkCare Program. The fee shall be received by Community Health Partners by the 20th of each month. Fees to be disbursed to: Community Health Partners 408 Goodlette Road S. Naples, FL 34102 Workcare Program ...................................................................... $2.85 PEPM 10 16E Exhibit 2 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES The managed care arrangement has an appeals process designed to allow treating providers and injured employees to appeal the utilization review determinations made by clinical review staff. Appeals Informal Appeal During Pre-Certification If, based on the available case information in consultation with a Physician Advisor, WorkCare is unable to certify a hospitalization or procedure, the review nurse will inform the claims representative, attending physician and facility of WorkCare's non-certification recommendation and will explain the appeals process. At that time, the provider, facility, or injured employee may file an informal appeal by calling 941-594- 8000 (or 888-446-6422 if out of area) and asking that the Physician Advisor who recommended non- certification review additional medical information which may impact his or her decision. The Physician Advisor will review the additional information and complete his review within 24 business hours of receipt of the additional information. If after reviewing this additional information the Physician Advisor continues to recommend non-certification, a second level appeal will be offered to the attending physician, facility and injured employee. Formal Appeal During Pre-Certification The attending physician, facility or injured employee is asked to submit an appeal to WorkCare or the insured in writing. In explaining the appeals process, the review nurse will inform the appellant that the written request for appeal should include additional medical information which is believed to support the request for a procedure or hospitalization. This written request may be sent to WorkCare at: WorkCare 408 Goodlette Rd. S Naples, Florida 34102 In the event that an attending physician declines the opportunity to a formal appeal but still plans to admit the patient to the hospital, the review nurse will inform the hospital that the admission has not been certified. The hospital itself then has the opportunity to submit a written request for an appeal, which should contain additional medical information believed to support the request for hospitalization or procedure. Upon receipt of the written appeal from the provider, facility or injured employee, the Utilization Review Supervisor will review the appeal in consultation with a second Physician Advisor (who has not been involved in the first recommendation of non-certification) in the same specialty or higher as the attending provider. If, after reviewing the medical information, WorkCare determines that the procedure or hospitalization will be recommended for certification, the Utilization Review Supervisor will inform the claims 11 16E 4 representative and then the attending provider and hospital that, based on the additional medical information provided in the formal written appeal, WorkCare recommends certification of the procedure or hospitalization. Again, the determination will be made within 24 business hours of receipt of the additional medical information. If WorkCare is still unable to recommend certification based on a review of the additional medical documentation, the attending provider, hospital and claims representative will be notified immediately by telephone, with a follow-up written report within 48 business hours of the non-certification determination. Standard Appeals Process Non-Authorization/Non-Certification A standard appeal is conducted any time a provider requests an appeal of a non-authorization/non- certification determination. Requests for a standard appeal are received via mail, telephone or FAX within one (1) month of the occurrence. The appeal is entered into the Case Management System and routed to the Utilization Review Supervisor within 24 hours of receipt. A request for a standard appeal must include additional medical information believed to support medical necessity of the treatment in question or any unusual circumstance which may affect the determination. Upon receipt of the additional medical information, the Utilization Review Supervisor will review the medical documentation with a second Physician Advisor of the same specialty or higher as the attending. The Supervisor will then inform the claims representative, attending provider and facility of WorkCare's recommendation regarding certification of the medical treatment. If WorkCare's decision is to certify the care, the Supervisor will inform the attending provider, facility, claims representative and/or patient that the treatment has been certified based on the submission of an appeal which included additional medical information not made available to WorkCare at the time of the original request for treatment. This decision will be made within seven (7) days of receipt of the additional medical documentation. If the decision is to uphold the original non-authorization/non-certification recommendation, the provider, facility, claims representative and/or injured employee will be notified within seven (7) business days of the receipt of the additional information. Clinical rationale will be outlined as the basis for the determination in all written reports. Patient Complaints of Physicians The handling of complaints should include prompt acknowledgment, immediate review, impartial hearings, and transmittal of the decisions to those concerned. Once a complaint has been received, it should be acknowledged promptly, and the complainant should be informed of the procedures that WorkCare will follow in response to the complaint. Complaints may be filed by patient, employer, or physician. Complaints should be submitted in writing, by phone or by fax within one (1) month of the occurrence and a simple form may be developed for the filing of complaints. In addition, WorkCare should ask permission from the complainant to review medical records that are relevant to the complaint. If permission is not received, the complainant should be informed that it may not be possible to process the complaint. 12 16E 4 All complaints should be referred to the grievance committee for the following procedures: Screening Complaints against physicians must be screened to determine whether they should be reviewed by the grievance committee, referred to another agency for review, both, or neither. In several situations, a referral of the complaint would be appropriate. If there is reason to believe that a threat to the health of the physician's patients exists, then the state licensing board and the physician's hospital should be notified immediately. Review When a review is appropriate, the chair of the grievance committee should designate one or more members of the committee to conduct a review. The review should include one or more of the following steps: interviews of the complainant, the physician and any other person who has knowledge of the facts involved; interviews of other physicians in the physician's field of practice; and examination of relevant medical records. Interviews may be conducted through written correspondence. Reviews should be conducted as quickly as possible and every effort should be made to complete them within one (1) month. Upon completion of the review, the reviewer should make a report to the grievance committee of his/her findings. After the committee reaches a decision, it should notify the complainant and the physician of its decision along with a full explanation for its conclusions: (a) the physician did not act improperly and therefore no further proceedings are warranted, (b) the matter should be referred to the disciplinary committee and/or other agency or institution for further proceedings, (c) the physician acted inappropriately but not seriously enough to warrant disciplinary proceedings or proceedings by an outside agency, (d) efforts should be made to resolve the matter through mediation. Mediation By using mediation, the grievance committee can achieve two important goals: (1) an amicable settlement of the complaint and (2) education of the physician as to the proper course of conduct. A committee member trying to mediate a dispute should encourage the parties to discuss their relative positions and should allow a full discussion before attempting to bring the matter to a conclusion. Expedited Appeals Process Non-Authorization/Non-Certification An expedited appeal is conducted when an appeal is needed within 24 business hours of the original non- certification determination. At the time the original non-certification determination is given to the attending physician and facility, the right to an expedited appeal is explained. If the provider, facility or injured employee requests an expedited appeal, a telephonic appeal will be conducted. A second Physician Advisor of the same specialty or higher as the attending provider will conduct a peer-to-peer telephonic consultation with the attending provider to determine if medical necessity is established. This telephonic peer-to-peer review with the attending provider will be conducted within 24 hours or the next business day. Results of the appeal will be telephoned to the attending provider, facility, and claims representative within the same working day as the determination. If the Physician Advisor reverses the initial non-certification recommendation, the traditional concurrent review process will be resumed as the certified treatment progresses. If the Physician Advisor upholds 13 the initial non-certification at the expedited appeal level (not resolving the difference of opinion), the provider may resubmit the appeal through the standard formal appeal process. All the above written appeals procedures will be made available to all providers, facilities, and employees as required by Florida law. The procedures will also be included in the informational materials distributed by the insurer to the covered employees. Upon full completion of the grievance procedures offered by Managed Care Arrangement, the provider, facility or injured employee may file an appeal with the Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security, Division of Workers' Compensation. A copy of the final decision rendered by WorkCare will be provided to the Division of Workers' Compensation at the time an appeal with the Division is requested. Change of Provider An injured employee is allowed one change of provider by requesting such change directly from the employee's Medical Care Coordinator Physician(s). Should an injured employee desire a second change of provider, an appeal must be filed detailing the reasons for the second change of provider. Review personnel will review the appeal and make a final determination. If a change in Medical Care Coordinator Physician(s) is requested, a written request must be forwarded to the insurer for approval. Arbitration All appeals procedures are aimed at mutual agreement for settlement. Should an injured employee, provider or facility desire arbitration of a difference of opinion, WorkCare will make available an impartial arbitrator to hear the case and resolve the dispute. Client Concerns WorkCare's Client Concerns Department is responsible for the initial processing of "Client Concerns", and they can be reached at the telephone number, 941-594-8000 (or 888-446-6422 if out of area). Client Concerns are issues and problems raised by clients, employers or providers to the Field Service Representatives or directly to WorkCare Client Concerns. Note:Periodic employee satisfaction surveys will be conducted by WorkCare. These will be compiled in order to determine any potential service/quality problems and to note service trends. Within seven (7) days of admission to the program, a Field Service Representative will contact the client by telephone. The purpose of this contact is to take a proactive stance in assessing the concerns of the client. Feedback is elicited from the client in an attempt to better address any concerns they may have. The Field Service Representative will begin a Client Concerns Assessment Form upon contacting the individual. Any problem or issue not addressed via the Field Service Representative contact may be brought to the attention of the Field Service Representative either by faxing or mailing in a Client Concern Form to the 14 Client Concerns Supervisor. The Client Concerns Supervisor logs each Client Concern in an automated tracking program, assigns a tracking number, and identifies the type of concern (please see Standard Types of Client Concerns). By logging all items identified, WorkCare is better able to identify categories for improvement and any trends or areas of concern. If the Client Concerns Supervisor is able to resolve the issue, the concern is resolved immediately. If, however, the concern must be forwarded to another area for resolution, several additional items are logged. Additional items noted may include: the area assigned, the person responsible for resolution, the date assigned and the date resolved. The area given the concern is responsible to resolve the problem promptly and take corrective action when necessary. Contact is again made to the client by this person at this time. The response is then forwarded back to WorkCare Client Concerns. The resolution is documented on a Client Concern Response Form and is returned to the appropriate Field Service Representative within 48 business hours of receipt. The Field Service Representative will then notify the client, provider, employer or employee of the resolution. This program is evaluated by the ability of the staff to address all client concerns within a reasonable response time. WorkCare also strives to keep the number of client concerns initiated to a minimum by providing quality client service and a thorough quality improvement program. Standard Types of Client Concerns Explanation of Standard Type Codes: A Turnaround Time Response not within established service standard. B C D E F G H Communication/Follow-up Requests for case status, lack of follow up, status of bills sent in, etc. Error Correction Specific errors in dates, dollar amounts, social security numbers, telephone numbers, spelling of names, providers, facilities, bills returned without discounts applied, void requests, repricing errors. Cost/Invoices Pricing clarification, invoice inaccuracies, statement issues. reports not attached to invoices, customer balance Improper Handling Information routed to incorrect offices or departments, wrong carrier invoiced. Special Requests/Carrier Instructions Requests for report or invoice copies, requests for special procedure changes and arrangements. Personnel Complaints Inappropriate comments to callers, rudeness, client dissatisfaction with any WorkCare staff. System/Procedure Complaints Dissatisfaction with WorkCare procedure or system issue, criteria questions or issues. 15 16E 4 Does Not Warrant a Client Concern Form Form submitted when issue not a true client concern. Provider Issues Providers refusing to honor contracted discounts, contract clarification requests, balance billing issues. K Appeals Disagreement with recommendations rendered. L Other All other issues. Annual Grievance Report All grievance information will be maintained in the system for follow-up and reporting purposes. The information that will be maintained includes, but is not limited to number of grievances filed, the subject of all grievances filed, the nature of the grievance and the resolutions of all grievances filed. This information will be filed with the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration no later than March 31 of each year. 16 16E 5 MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Re~ November 21,2002 Stacey Sandman, Property Acquisition Specialist Property Acquisition & Construction Management Facilities Management Department Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Corrective Statutory Deed and Amendment to Agreement with the School Board for Future Construciton of an Elementary School in Golden Gate Estates Enclosed please find the original documents as referenced above (Agenda Item #16E5), as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 19, 2002. Please forward the Agreement to the School Board for the required signatures and after recording the deed, kindly have both originals returned to Minutes and Records. If you should have any questions, please call me at 774-8406. Thank you'. Enclosures CORRRECTIVE STATUTORY DEED THIS DEED, made this .,/~1~ day of ~'~}~ , 200~. by COLLIER COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ACTING IN THEIR CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE GAC LAND TRUST, having a mailing address of 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter called the Grantor, to DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, having a mailing address of 3710 Estey Avenue, Naples, Florida 34104, hereinafter called the Grantee. (Whenever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations.) WITNESSETH that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) to it in hand paid by the Grantee, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the Grantee, his heirs and assigns forever, the following described land lying and being in Collier County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the Lands: All of Tracts 2 and 3, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 72, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Board of County Commissioners acting by the Chairman or Vice Chairman of said Board, the day and year aforesaid. ,-.?wiGHT B~ BR~,.~CK, Clerk ~. ., ~. , ~:'~.,~., :'~.~ . s lgnat~e"::~l~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: It'~l~'~~ JA ~ N. COLE"I fA, CHAIRMAN ~Dproved asto form ~/legal sufficiency ,.tqm., /k .... .......... - '-AsSistant C0unt~ a~t~r"~; AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT 16E ~_ THIS A ~MENDMENT TO AGREEMENT entered into this ~day of 7~0-.~, 2002, by and between, the DISTRICT SC,,HOOL,,B, OARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, (hereinafter referred to as the School ) whose mailing address is 5775 Osceola Trail, Naples, Florida 34109, and COLLIER COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ACTING IN THEIR CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE GAC LAND TRUST, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112 (hereinafter referred to as the "County"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the County and School have previously entered into an Agreement dated January 16, 2001; and WHEREAS, the County and the School are desirous of amending said Agreement; and NOW ,THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements provided within the said Agreement dated January 16, 2002 and Ten Dollars ($10.00) and Other Valuable Consideration, the said Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 1. Paragraph "1" of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following provision is substituted in its place: The County hereby agrees to convey to the school, via Statutory Deed and for no monetary compensation, all of Tracts 2 and 3, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 72, to be utilized by the School for the purposes hereinafter stated, (hereinafter referred to as the "Lands"), in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2. Paragraphs "2" and "4" of the Agreement are hereby deleted in their entirety. 2. Except as expressly provided herein, the said Agreement between the County and School remains in full force and effect according to the terms and conditions contained therein, and said terms and conditions are applicable hereto except as expressly provided otherwise herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the School and County have hereto executed this Amendment to Agreement the day and year first abo~,e written. Attest as to signature BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS JAMI:~ N COLETTA, Chairman AS TO SCHOOL: DATED: ATTEST: Superintendent of Schools and Ex-Officio Secretary !6E 5 DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: ANNE GOODNIGHT, Chair Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Assistant Cqunty Attorney 16F 1_ DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF DECEMBER 13, 2002 16F 2 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF DECEMBER 13, 2002 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE November 19, 2002 FOR BOARD ACTION: 1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED: mo Co Clerk of Courts: Submitted for public record, pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1), the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period: 1. Disbursements for October 19, 2002 through October 25,2002. 2. Disbursements for October 26, 2002 through November 1, 2002. Districts: Mediterra South Community Development District - Minutes of the July 24, 2002 Meeting, Adopted Budget FY 2003 and Unaudited Financial Statements dated 6/30/02. o Port of the Islands Community Improvement District - Minutes of Meeting held September 20, 2002, Auditor's Report FY Ended 9/30/01, Management Letter, Response to Management Letter and Financial Report dated September 20, 2002. o Naples Heritage Community Development District - Minutes of Meeting held August 12, 2002, Adopted Budget FY 2003 and Unaudited Financial Statement 7/31/02. Minutes: Vanderbilt Beach M.S.T.U.Advisory Committee - Agenda for November 7, 2002, Minutes of October 3, 2002. 2. Library Advisory Board_- Minutes of September 25, 2002. ° Collier County Hispanic Affairs Advisory Board - Agenda for October 30, 2002. 4. Workforce Housing Advisory Committee - Agenda for October 14, 2002 o Bayshore Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board Workshop_-Agenda for October 21, 2002. H:Data/Format 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Value Adjustment Board_- Agenda and Minutes of October 2, 2002 and the Agenda and Minutes of October 3, 2002. Community Character/Smart Growth Committee_- Agenda for June 26, 2002 and minutes of September 18, 2002. Development Services Advisory Committee_- Agenda for November 6, 2002, Minutes of October 2, 2002. Workforce Housing Advisory Committee - Minutes of October 14, 2002. Environmental Advisory Council - Agenda for November 6, 2002. Golden Gate Beautification Advisory Committee- Agenda for November 12, 2002, Minutes of October 8, 2002. Bayshore Beautification M.S.T.U. - Minutes of October 9, 2002. I_-75/Golden Gate Ad Hoc Landscaping Beautification Committee - Minutes of October 9, 2002. Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board_- Agenda for November 6, 2002. Collier County Planning Commission_- Agenda for November 7, 2002, Minutes of October 3, 2002. H:Data/Format Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County, Florida Finance & Accounting Department MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: 10/22//02 Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners Constance C. Murray, General Operations Manager Finance Department/Clerk to the Board Board of County Commissioners Disbursements Please find attached a listing of the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period October 19, 2002 through October 25, 2002. In accordance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1) I request that these reports be included as miscellaneous correspondence to the Board of County Commissioners and made part o£the official records. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please telephone me at 774- 8481. 161 1 Q:lManual CheckslAPMLOG BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A/P Manual Check Log DATE ISSUED TO: CK# AMOUNT 0/1612002 011712002 0/18~2002 0/18~2002 0118~2002 0118/2002 0118/2002 0118/2002 0/21 ~2002 0/2212002 0/22/2002 United States Postal Service Clerk of Courts Metro Ice JC Productions Jackie Nolder Adriana Gomez The Clown Connection Dodge City Amusements Derek Bennett Custom Catering Check Run Beginning Check Run Ending 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 5OO 592849 593314 74.00 2,000.00 140.00 400.00 275.O0 230.00 375.00 425.00 8,600.00 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET 161 VCHR DISC 1 PAGE VCHR NET CHECK NO 30001009 30001009 30001009 CHECK NO 30000706 CHECK NO 30000704 CHECK NO 30000937 30000938 30000975 30001095 30000937 30000938 30000937 593213 VENDOR 356020 - 3001 INC 4918 205386 6/16-7/13/02 4962 205386 7/14-8/24/02 5011 205386 8/25-9/24/02 301-210140-631400-50014 0.00 301-210140-631400-50014 0.00 301-210140-631400-50014 0.00 593220 VENDOR 359700 - AA LASER SERVICE & SUPPLY, INCORP 3822 001-121710-646710-00000 250746 REPAIR 593115 VENDOR 302420 - AAA BLIND FACTORY ACCT#7708 001-122240-646110-00000 250598 BLINDS 592976 VENDOR 161100 - AAA GENERATOR & PUMP INC. G02-1009 310338 SUPPLIES 408-233351-634999-00000 G02-1055 311438 SUPPLIES 001-122240-634999-00000 GO2 1044 310600 SERVICE 408-233352-634999-00000 G02-1048 310338 REPAIR 408-233351-634999-00000 G02-0994 310338 SUPPLIES 408-233351-634999-00000 G02-1052 311438 SUPPLIES 001-122240-634999-00000 G02-1000 310338 SUPPLIES 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.675.00 46,125.00 27,675.00 CHECK TOTAL 163.95 CHECK TOTAL 344.00 CHECK TOTAL 520.59 320.52 503.47 1,002.43 298.71 240.47 407.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,675.00 46,125.00 27,675.00 101,475.00 163.95 163.95 344.00 344.00 520.59 320.52 503.47 1,002.43 298.71 240.47 407.71 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000937 30000961 30000937 30001095 30000937 30000938 30000937 30000938 30000937 30000976 30000937 30000937 30000969 30000937 30000938 30000937 30000938 DESCRIPTION G02-1006 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1065 310704 REPLACEMNETS G02-0999 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1047 310338 MATERIALS G02-0993 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1050 311438 SUPPLIES G02-1001 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1059 311438 SUPPLIES G02-0991 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1063 310731 REPAIR G02-1004 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1010 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1045 310459 LABOR G02-0995 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1056 311438 SUPPLIES G02-1012 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1058 311438 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 408-253221-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 408-253211-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 408-233312-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 135.60 0.00 2,355.06 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 135.60 2.355.06 318.66 0.00 318.66 381.10 0.00 381.10 359.10 0.00 359.10 204.40 0.00 204.40 318.66 0.00 318.66 610.40 0.00 610.40 399.10 0.00 399.10 485.67 0.00 485.67 402.55 O.OO 402.55 248.41 0.00 248.41 900.11 0.00 900.11 299.16 0.00 299.16 147.92 0.00 147.92 1,010.00 0,00 1.010.00 180.56 0.00 180.56 OCTOBER 23, 2002 PAGE 3 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000937 30000937 30000975 30000937 30000938 30000937 30000937 30000976 30000937 30000938 30000938 30000938 30001095 30000938 DESCRIPTION G02-1003 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1007 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1043 310600 SERVICE G02-0992 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1016 311438 SUPPLIES G02-1002 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1008 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1064 310731 REPLACEMENTS G02-1011 310338 SUPPLIES G02-1054 311438 SUPPLIES G02-1049 311438 SUPPLIES G02-1057 311438 SUPPLIES G02-1041 310338 MATERIALS G02-1053 311438 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 408-233352-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 408-253211-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000694 593067 VENDOR 263750 - AARENDS COURIER SERVICE 2729 111-138317-641950-00000 250928 FOR 10/17 MEETING 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 314.41 0.00 1 VCHR NET 314.41 142.70 0.00 142.70 463.67 0.00 463.67 399.10 0.00 399.10 256.39 0.00 256.39 307.87 0.00 307.87 931.68 0,00 931.68 481.69 0.00 481.69 1,090.00 0.00 1,090.00 306.67 0.00 306.67 93.68 0.00 93.68 157.49 0.00 157.49 381.10 0.00 381.10 805.34 0.00 805.34 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 18.182.15 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 160.00 0.00 160.00 0,00 160.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 592961 VENDOR 147860 - ABE SKINNER, PROPERTY APPRAISER 20045233 NAPLES PARK NAPLES PARK TAX ROLL 226-959050-930600-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000718 593093 VENDOR 288960 - ABLE BODY TEMPORARY SERVICE 115009522 109-182602-634999-00000 109-182901-634999-00000 310019 TEMP LABOR 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 430058 593265 VENDOR 900010 - ACTION TITLE OVRPYMT 54-517409 OVRPYNT 54-517409 410-000000-121200-00000 CHECK NO 30001050 593165 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 335370 - ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 001-000000-218810-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30000719 30000719 30000719 30000719 30000719 30000719 593087 VENDOR 282670 - ADVANCED AIR & REFRIGERATION, INC. 4972 311435 LABOR 001-122240-652997-00000 4975 311435 LABOR 001-122240-652997-00000 4976 311435 LABOR 001-122240-652997-00000 4971 311435 LABOR 001-122240-652997-00000 4921 311435 LABOR 001-122240-652997-00000 4974 311435 LABOR 001-122240-652997-00000 2,275.04 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 905.19 3,491.09 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 2,275.04 2,275.04 4,396.28 4.396.28 0.00 233.52 0.00 233.52 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 233.52 0.00 247.50 0.00 247.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 247.50 0.00 212.50 0.00 212.50 0.00 112.50 0.00 112.50 0.00 112.50 0.00 112.50 0.00 262.50 0.00 262.50 0.00 771.50 0.00 771.50 0.00 87.50 0.00 87.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,559.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30000929 30001005 30000926 30000929 30000926 30000926 30000931 30000926 30000926 30000926 30000932 30000929 30001004 592860 13354 915545 TO 9/13/02 13352 6446 TO 9/13/02 R13358 916790 TO 9/13/02 13353 915545 TO 9/13/02 R13362 916790 TO 9/13/02 13361 916790 TO 9/13/02 R13356 103268 TO 9/13/02 13359 916790 TO 9/13/02 R13360 916790 TO 9/13/02 13357 916790 TO 9/13/02 13436 206931 TO 9/13/02 R13355 915545 TO 9/13/02 R13343-2 102866 TO 9/13/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 300 - AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC. 325-172940-631400-51101 325-172972-631400-31212 325-172940-631400-51212 313-163673-631400-60071 325-172940-631400-51101 331-163650-631400-62071 331-163650-631400-62071 333-163650-631400-65031 313-163673-631400-65031 313-163673-631400-62071 313-163673-631400-62071 313-163673-631400-60071 313-163673-631410-65061 325-172940-631400-51101 368-116360-631400-00163 368-116365-631400-80163 AMT DISC 0.00 161 1 AMI NET VCHR DISC 38,410.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 358.75 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 38,410.60 358.75 0.00 518.85 0.00 518.85 0.00 9,222.50 0.00 9,222.50 0.00 298.49 0.00 298.49 CHECK NO 30000738 592995 VENDOR 172480 - ALAN PRODUCTIONS P.LOPEZ 02-832 681-410310-634406-00000 P. LOPEZ 02-832 8,826.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 152.50 0.00 9,477.50 0.00 0.00 8,826.00 152.50 9,477.50 0.00 293.99 0.00 293.99 0.00 0.00 5,561.00 0.00 45,410.75 0.00 5,561.00 45,410.75 0.00 184.96 0.00 184.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 191.25 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 191.25 118,907.14 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30000690 593192 VENDOR 346490 - ALARMS BY BELL,INC. 7073 101-163612-634999-00000 250456 MONITORING 0.00 CHECK NO 30000974 30000726 593221 10-10-02 8- 11:30 ALEXANDER YOUNG 10-10 8-12 4 HOURS 8-12 4 HOURS VENDOR 360300 - ALEXANDER YOUNG 681-431590-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30000739 30000973 30000973 30000739 30000739 30000973 30000739 30000739 593226 8:30-11:30 8:30-11:30 10-14-02 ALICIA FERRER ALICIA FERER 8-12 10-09-02 ALICIA FERRER ALICIA FERRER 10-09-02 8:30 11:00 8:30-10:30 8:30-10:30 8:30-12 12-1:30 8:30-12 12-1:30 10-10-02 8- 12 4 HOURS ALICIA FERRER 10-10-02 8:30-12 1-7 8:30-12 1-7 8-12 1-7:30 8-12 1-7:30 VENDOR 361520 - ALICIA M FERRER 681-421190-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30000727 592942 VENDOR 127610 - ALL ANIMALS CLINIC J.ROOZEN 02-10605 610-155413-631970-00000 311482 J. ROOZEN 02-10605 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 104.85 CHECK TOTAL 56.00 64.00 CHECK TOTAL 48.00 48.00 40.00 32.00 80.00 64.00 152.00 168.00 CHECK TOTAL 60.00 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 150.00 104.85 104.85 56. O0 64.00 120.00 48.00 48.00 40.00 32.00 80.00 64.00 152.00 168.00 632.00 60,00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000727 DESCRIPTION C, MOBLEY 02-9780 311482 C. MOBLEY 02-9780 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000716 30000716 30000715 30000716 30000716 30000715 592930 I0306167 310604 SUPPLIES I0304589 310604 SUPPLIES I0304764 310714 SUPPLIES I0304737 310604 SUPPLIES I0303966 310604 SUPPLIES I0304376 310714 SUPPLIES VENDOR 109450 - ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORPORATION 408-233352-652310-00000 0.00 408-233352-652310-00000 0.00 408-233312-652310-00000 0.00 408-233352-652310-00000 0.00 408-233352-652310-00000 0.00 408-233312-652310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000825 593139 VENDOR 318980 - ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. VFB2CZ2 10/2/02 198-157440-641700-00000 VFB2CZ2 10/2/02 311417 0.00 CHECK NO 30000737 30000692 30000695 30000728 592861 037529 310468 23007A 250921 113722 250991 037969 202503 VENDOR SUPPLIES COPIER COPIER MNT RENTAL 550 - ALPHA OMEGA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 111-156381-646710-00000 001-155410-646710-00000 113-138915-651910-00000 301-121125-644600-50017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 65.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,754.78 1,748.05 1,822.39 1,782.39 1,752.65 1,820.27 CHECK TOTAL 35.33 CHECK TOTAL 41.00 695.57 145.28 50.29 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 65.00 125.00 1.754.78 1,748.05 1,822,39 1,782.39 1,752.65 1,820.27 10,680.53 35.33 35.33 41.00 695.57 145.28 50.29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 932.14 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30000693 30000697 593206 112032 250090 REPAIR MEMORIAL PLAQUE 111897 250089 PLAQUE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 351750 - ALPHA SPECIALTIES AND AWARDS 001-156363-634999-00000 001-156363-652910-00000 AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30000703 593247 VENDOR 365560 - AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SPORTS MEDICINE 10087 111-156313-654210-00000 250125 MEMBERSHIP PAGE CHECK NO 3000962 3000962 3000962 3000962 593099 12487 310113 PARTS 12564 310113 PARTS 12563 310113 PARTS 12553 310113 PARTS VENDOR 295120 - AMERICAN LAFRANCE MEDICMASTER 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 VCHR NET 0.00 99.20 0.00 99.20 0,00 786.89 0.00 786.89 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 886.09 CHECK NO 30000705 593160 VENDOR 332550 - AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 118604 113-138312-654210-00000 250766 MEMBERSHIP DUES 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 CHECK NO 30000711 593167 VENDOR 336430 - AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE MEMBERSHIP MSAWYER 113-138312-654210-00000 250964 MSAWYER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 90.00 CHECK NO 430062 593306 VENDOR 900140 - AMY GRANATO VOLTA, ARNP 0101- 9/13/02 PLANNED PRT 681-410310-634406-00000 PLANNED PARENTHOOD RAPE KIT 9/13 0.00 199.84 0.00 199.84 0.00 583.10 0.00 583.10 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 1,141.16 O. O0 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,141.16 1,959.10 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 363.00 0.00 363.00 0.00 363.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 30000573 593191 VENDOR 346270 220558 206946 SUPER WALMART APPRAISAL CHECK NO 30001156 593177 VENDOR 339570 9643 311580 COPIES CHECK NO 30000707 593122 VENDOR 308670 10/01/02 250944 FUEL EXPENSE CHECK NO 30001130 592937 VENDOR 119490 MEMBER#74231 251034 MEMBERSHIP CHECK NO 30000735 593183 VENDOR 343990 R3035 311622 RENTAL CHECK NO 30000740 30000967 30000740 30000740 592963 VENDOR 148190 1:30-2:30 i HOUR 1:30-2:30 I HOUR 10-10-02 1- 2:30 10-10-02 1.5 HOUR 9-1 4 HOURS 9-1 4 HOURS 8:30-9 1/2 HOUR 8:30-9 1/2 HOUR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC ANDERSON & CARR INC. 313-163673-631600-60171 0.00 ANOTHER PRINTER 111-100130-647110-00000 0.00 ANTON BURTSCHER 001-144510-652410-00000 0.00 APCO, INC. 001-121141-654210-00000 0.00 AQUA PURE OF SW FLORIDA 118-144211-652990-34300 0.00 ARSENE MAJUSTE 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 161 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 4,000.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,196.80 CHECK TOTAL 251.37 CHECK TOTAL 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 49.95 CHECK TOTAL 16. O0 24.00 8.00 36.00 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 150.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 1,196.80 1,196.80 251.37 251.37 60.00 60.00 49.95 49.95 16.00 24.00 8.00 36.00 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000740 30000967 30000740 30000740 30000967 30000967 30000967 30000967 30000967 30000967 30000740 DESCRIPTION 9-1 4 HOURS 9-1 4 HOURS 10-09-02 8:30 11:00 ARSENE MAJUSTE 2.5 HOURS 8:30-12 URS 8:30- 12 8:30-9 1/2 HOUR 8:30-9 1/2 HOUR 10-11-02 8:30 12:00 ARSENE MAJUSTE 3.5 HOURS 10-15-02 9:30 2:45 ARSENE MAJUSTE 1.75 HOUR 10-10-02 8:30 11:00 ARSENE MAJUSTE 1.5 HOUR 10-14-02 8:30 2:30 ARSENE MAJUSTE 5 HOUR 10/15/02 8:30 3:30 ARESENE MAJUSTE 10-15-02 10-10-02 9:30 12:30 ARSENE MAJUSTE 2.5 HOUR 8:30-12 3 1/2 HOURS 8:30-12 3 1/2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000966 592934 VENDOR 115320 - ASHBROOK CORPORATION 57445 408-253211-655100-00000 ASHBROOK CORPORATION CHECK NO 30000820 30001089 593148 VENDOR 323320 - AT & T 730 511 2831 001 9/27 730 511 2831 001 9/27 311008 056 281 8867 001 9/21 056 281 8867 001 9/21 681-431310-641900-00000 408-253211-641210-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 36.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 36.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 28.00 0.00 28.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 80.00 0,00 80.00 44.00 0.00 44.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 600.00 0.00 194.21 0.00 194.21 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 194.21 0.00 34.59 0.00 34.59 0.00 53.24 0.00 53.24 10 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001089 30001010 30001160 30001160 30000821 30001089 30001089 30000821 30000821 30000821 30001010 30001089 30000821 DESCRIPTION 055 281 0122 001 9/12 055 281 0122 001 9/12 055 282 3117 001 9/10 055 282 3117 001 9/10 730 510 4853 001 10/6 730 510 4853 001 10/6 056 275 7365 001 10/4 056 275 7365 001 10/4 730 511 5457 001 8/18 730 511 5457 001 8/18 056 283 9336 001 9/30 056 283 9336 001 9/30 730 511 5515 001 9/18 730 511 5515 001 9/18 058 063 1831 001 9/6 058 063 1831 001 9/6 056 594 8842 001 9/27 056 594 8842 001 9/27 056 286 0866 001 9/21 056 286 0866 001 9/21 055 284 2170 001 9/03 055 284 2170 001 9/3 730 511 3524 001 10/3 730 511 3524 001 10/3 730 511 5780 001 9/21 730 511 5780 001 9/21 CHECK NO 30001011 30001159 30001011 593040 VENDOR 236190 - AT&T 019 785 0647 001 9/18 019 785 0647 001 9/1 030 373 8367 001 10/6 030 373 8367 001 10/6 030 383 1893 001 8/7 030 383 1893 001 8/7 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155810-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 495-192370-641900-00000 0.00 408-253211-641100-00000 0.00 001-100110-641210-00000 0.00 408-210151-641100-00000 0.00 001-155810-641900-00000 0.00 113-138722-641900-00000 0.00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 146-144380-641900-00000 0.00 001-144210-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 408-233312-641100-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 AMT NET 21.17 61.41 156.87 48.10 17.51 51.59 46.04 19.54 16.17 13.28 58.22 30.47 33.07 CHECK TOTAL 2.931.34 22.11 24.09 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 21.17 61.41 156.87 48.10 17.51 51.59 46.04 19.54 16.17 13.28 58.22 30.47 33.07 661.27 2,931.34 22.11 24.09 11 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000819 DESCRIPTION 020 112 1860 001 9/16 020 112 1860 001 9/16 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-641400-00000 0.00 521-122450-641400-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430059 593266 VENDOR 900010 - ATI TITLE COMPANY OVR PYMT 51-378305 410-000000-121200-00000 OVR PYMT 51-378305 CHECK NO 30001202 30001202 593137 VENDOR 318740 - AVAYA, INC. 2714442664/0101441126 271442664/0101441126 2714564417/0100901789 2714564417/0100901789 001-000000-202800-00000 001-000000-202800-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 69.92 1.19 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30000736 592862 VENDOR U661194575 310112 SUPPLIES 1500 - AVIS RENT A CAR 521-122410-644610-00000 PAGE CHECK NO 30000574 30001087 30000709 30000712 30001168 30000729 593089 2377 207420 INSTALL FIBER 2340 310343 LABOR 2356 250047 PHONE LINE 2355 250459 COMPUTER 2374 206951 LABOR AND INSTALL 2379 206927 LABOR VENDOR 286720 - AZTEK COMMUNICATIONS 301-120435-762200-52001 408-233351-634999-00000 301-120435-763100-52525 101-163612-634999-00000 301-120435-762200-52001 301-120435-762200-52001 VCHR NET 71.11 3,048.65 0.00 192.58 0.00 192.58 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 192.58 7,253.63 0.00 7,253.63 0.00 443.64 0.00 443.64 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7,697.27 0.00 194.07 0.00 194.07 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 194.07 0.00 3,541.10 0.00 3,541.10 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 800.00 0.00 800.00 12 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000696 DESCRIPTION 2332 250967 COMPUTER LINE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 113-138930-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000734 592953 VENDOR 137960 - AZULE INDUSTRIES, INC. 2002693 001-155410-652910-00000 311189 SUPPLIES 161 1 CHECK NO 30000720 30000720 593140 VENDOR 320020 - AZURIX NORTH AMERICA 214223 001-122240-652994-00000 311817 REPAIRS 213560 001-122240-652994-00000 311817 REPAIRS AMT NET VCHR DISC 75.00 0,00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000635 30000839 592876 VENDOR 5003850943 311158 BOOKS 5003871651 311158 BOOKS 5003792051 311158 BOOKS 5003800468 311158 BOOKS 5003833386 311158 BOOKS 5003834586 311158 BOOKS 5003789898 311158 BOOKS 5003878791 311374 BOOKS 5003865788 311158 BOOKS 1740 - BAKER & TAYLOR CO 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 PAGE VCHR NET 75.00 22,611.10 0.00 977.69 0.00 977.69 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 977.69 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 1,384.99 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.384.99 1,534.99 0.00 16.80 0.00 16.80 0.00 79.92 0.00 79.92 0.00 126.36 0.00 126.36 0.00 93.42 0.00 93.42 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 55.28 0.00 55.28 0.00 155.79 0.00 155.79 0.00 92.40 0.00 92.40 2,475.09 0.00 0.00 2,475.09 13 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000634 30000635 30000635 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000635 30000839 30000635 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000635 30000635 30000635 DESCRIPTION 5003919298 311374 BOOKS 0000958644 311374 BOOKS 2009787142 311374 BOOKS 5003802122 311158 BOOKS 5003865523 311158 BOOKS 5003819849 311158 BOOKS 5003809223 311158 BOOKS 5003900479 311374 BOOKS 5003818794 311158 BOOKS 5003880948 311374 BOOKS 5003827419 311158 BOOKS 5003867723 311158 BOOKS 5005800529 311158 BOOKS 5003818789 311158 BOOKS 2009807517 311374 BOOKS 5003897781 311374 BOOKS 5003725188 311374 BOOKS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 O.O0 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 135.80 0.00 23.51- 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 135.80 23.51- 156.50 0.00 156.50 105.14 0.00 105.14 187.46 0.00 187.46 2,412.40 0.00 502.33 0.00 502.33 282.40 0.00 282.40 401.92 0.00 401.92 275.40 0.00 275.40 562.37 0.00 562.37 8.40 0.00 104.40 0.00 104.40 4.00 0.00 1,673.05 0.00 401.65 0.00 401.65 1,673.05 4.00 2,412.40 8.40 14 478.49 0.00 478.49 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000635 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000965 30000635 30000634 30000839 30000965 30000839 30000635 30000635 30000839 30000635 30000839 30000839 DESCRIPTION 5003909530 311374 BOOKS 5003809224 311158 BOOKS 5003792050 311158 BOOKS 5003815047 311158 BOOKS 5003800470 311158 BOOKS 2009866445 311740 AUDIO BOOKS 5003900548 311374 BOOKS 5003923283 311374 BOOKS 5003809225 311158 BOOKS 5003905505 311740 AUDIO BOOKS 5005787044 311158 BOOKS 5003914810 311374 BOOKS 5003904312 311374 BOOKS 5003818790 311158 BOOKS 5003898088 311374 BOOKS 5003871652 311158 BOOKS 5003819792 311158 BOOKS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0,00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 25.69 O. O0 PAGE VCHR NET 25.69 154.43 0.00 154.43 90.00 0.00 90.00 270.03 0.00 270.03 105.65 0.00 105.65 78.75 0.00 78.75 192.95 0.00 192.95 56.88 0.00 56.88 176.90 0.00 176.90 483.24 0.00 483.24 982.20 0.00 982.20 271.86 0.00 271.86 299.19 0.00 299.19 60.00 0.00 60.00 213.26 0.00 213.26 106.56 0.00 106.56 21.60 0.00 21.60 15 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000635 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000635 30000839 30000839 30000635 30000635 30000839 30000839 DESCRIPTION 2009753155 311158 BOOKS 2009585505 311158 BOOKS 5003859356 311158 BOOKS 5003812959 311158 BOOKS 5003908528 311374 BOOKS 5003818795 311158 BOOKS 5003810915 311158 BOOKS 5003875707 311158 BOOKS 5003814202 311158 BOOKS 5003792049 311158 BOOKS 5003886840 311374 BOOKS 5003834587 311158 BOOKS 5003809222 311158 BOOKS 2009787288 311374 BOOKS 5003874736 311374 BOOKS 5003806729 311158 BOOKS 5003850944 311158 BOOKS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 O.OO 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 161 AMT NET 259.19 444.96 93.81 125.34 746.08 59.88 493.31 170.96 163.66 46.80 55.52 157.30 135.00 979.16 32.00 2,028.20 122.85 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 259.19 444.96 93.81 125.34 746.08 59.88 493.31 170.96 163.66 46.80 55.52 157.30 135. O0 979.16 32.00 2,028.20 122.85 16 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000839 30000635 30000839 30000965 30000839 30000839 30000634 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000635 30000839 30000634 30000635 30000839 30000839 30000635 DESCRIPTION 5003802340 311158 BOOKS 5003886883 311374 BOOKS 5003796871 311158 BOOKS 5003900519 311740 AUDIO BOOKS 5003834588 311158 BOOKS 5003846826 311158 BOOKS 5003923128 311374 BOOKS 5003872293 311158 BOOKS 5003839666 311158 BOOKS 2009728056 311158 BOOKS 2009807159 311374 BOOKS 5003843846 311158 BOOKS 5003920811 311374 BOOKS 3005996933 311374 BOOKS 5003866090 311158 BOOKS 5003809221 311158 BOOKS 5003882866 311374 BOOKS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 1~. 6 I 1 ~ PAGE AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 61.58 0.00 61.58 1,749.77 17 0.00 1,749.77 547.14 0.00 547.14 333.56 0.00 333.56 162.25 0.00 162.25 47.90 0.00 47.90 75.00 0.00 75.00 11.97 0.00 11.97 230.53 0.00 230.53 611.97 0.00 611.97 268.55 0.00 268.55 145,92 0.00 145.92 689.86 0.00 689,86 1.597,85 0.00 1,597.85 166.32 0.00 166.32 85.32 0.00 85.32 458.38 0.00 458.38 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000635 30000839 30000635 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000839 30000635 30000839 30000634 30000635 30000634 30000634 30000839 30000634 30000635 DESCRIPTION 5003882966 311374 BOOKS 5003871653 311158 BOOKS 5003886839 311374 BOOKS 5003818792 311158 BOOKS 5003818793 311158 BOOKS 5003818791 311158 BOOKS 5003808121 311158 BOOKS 5003832685 311158 BOOKS 2009866466 311374 BOOKS 5003815045 311158 BOOKS 5003909081 311374 BOOKS 5003894242 311374 BOOKS 5003922020 311374 BOOKS 2009866485 311374 BOOKS 5003802356 311158 BOOKS 50036919295 311374 BOOKS 2009795652 311374 BOOKS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 1 ¸61 AMT NET VCHR DISC 303.42 0.00 5,902.28 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 303.42 5.902.28 103.08 0.00 103.08 82.80 0.00 82.80 91.02 0.00 91.02 79.92 0.00 79.92 314.39 0.00 314.39 191.80 0.00 191.80 450.86 0.00 450.86 115.09 0.00 115.09 71.50 0.00 71.50 951.79 0.00 951.79 109.50 0.00 109.50 25.95 0.00 25.95 35.84 0.00 35.84 567.54 0,00 567.54 53.81 0.00 53.81 18 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000635 30000839 30000634 30000635 3000O839 30000635 30000839 30000634 30000634 30000839 30000839 30000635 30000839 30000635 30000839 30000634 30000839 DESCRIPTION 5003882263 311374 BOOKS 5003842293 311158 BOOKS 5003914646 311374 BOOKS 5003889835 311374 BOOKS 5003796885 311158 BOOKS 5003919177 311374 BOOKS 5003809906 311158 BOOKS 5003919683 311374 BOOKS 5003919294 311374 BOOKS 5003845678 311158 BOOKS 3005933485 311158 BOOKS 5003902541 311374 BOOKS 5005880453 311158 BOOKS 5003905521 311374 BOOKS 5003833016 311158 BOOKS 5003916695 311374 BOOKS 5003845858 311158 BOOKS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 O.OO 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 O.O0 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 161 AMT NET 321.25 31.14 284.87 430.27 185.28 20.85 229.80 107.89 104.70 292.40 1,749.28 7.45 835.06 101.70 4.894.11 52.81 169.43 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 321.25 31.14 284.87 430.27 185.28 20.85 229.80 107.89 104.70 292.40 1.749.28 7.45 835.06 101.70 4.894.11 52.81 169.43 19 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000839 5003865925 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003792053 311158 BOOKS 30000635 5003898090 311374 BOOKS 30000839 5003832690 311158 BOOKS 30000635 5003880954 311374 BOOKS 30000839 0000938133 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003873143 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003845856 311158 BOOKS 30000839 2009449301 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003852078 311158 BOOKS 30000635 5003900376 311374 BOOKS 30000839 5003823285 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003859357 311158 BOOKS 30000635 5003898089 311374 BOOKS 30000634 5003923854 311374 BOOKS 30000635 5003882262 311374 BOOKS 30000839 5003832712 311158 BOOKS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 O.OO 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 6,151.19 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 6,151.19 60.12 0.00 60.12 354.63 0.00 354.63 16.90 0.00 16.90 2,661.48 0.00 59.31- 0.00 2,661.48 59.31- 120.38 0.00 120.38 199.56 0.00 199.56 329.66 0.00 329.66 476.17 0.00 476.17 61.67 0.00 61.67 207.06 0.00 207.06 259.83 0.00 259.83 192.32 0.00 192.32 83.64 0.00 83.64 93.15 0.00 93.15 20 601.93 0.00 601.93 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000635 20098707120 311374 BOOKS 30000634 5003919296 311374 BOOKS 30000839 5003865926 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003792052 311158 BOOKS 30000635 5003905511 311374 BOOKS 30000839 5003852083 311158 BOOKS 30000635 5003880453 311374 BOOKS 30000634 5003919301 311374 BOOKS 30000839 5003810112 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003865924 311158 BOOKS 30000634 5003919297 311374 BOOKS 30000839 5003800472 311158 BOOKS 30000839 2009585518 311158 BOOKS 30000635 5003880466 311374 BOOKS 30000635 5003760508 311374 BOOKS 30000839 5003802477 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003800469 311158 BOOKS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 21 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 532.96 0.00 532.96 490.69 0.00 490.69 483.07 0.00 483.07 108.99 0.00 108.99 2,395.62 0.00 2,395.62 222.67 0.00 222.67 134.10 0.00 134.10 1,040.52 0.00 1,040.52 108.99 0.00 108,99 53.28 0.00 53.28 2,485.59 0.00 2,485.59 124.28 0.00 124.28 459.20 0.00 459.20 78.47 0.00 78.47 150.05 0.00 150.05 62.40 0.00 62.40 108.99 0.00 108.99 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000839 5003834584 311158 800KS 30000635 5003886841 311374 BOOKS 30000839 5003808125 311158 BOOKS 30000635 5003898091 311374 BOOKS 30000635 5003885760 311374 BOOKS 30000839 5003785913 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003878156 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003839665 311158 BOOKS 30000634 3006067794 311374 BOOKS 30000839 5003870081 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003866989 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003785250 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003800471 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003833014 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003790096 311158 BOOKS 30000839 5003834585 311158 BOOKS 30000635 5003886844 311374 BOOKS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 60.00 0.00 4,925.21 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 60.00 4.925.21 10.80 0.00 10.80 93.36 0.00 93.36 358.12 0.00 358.12 156.35 0.00 156.35 145.78 0.00 145.78 603.61 0.00 603.61 906.96 0.00 906.96 35.99 0.00 35.99 172.53 0.00 172.53 541.29 0.00 541.29 213.42 0.00 213.42 3,025.63 0.00 3.025.63 354.19 0.00 354.19 79.92 0.00 79.92 2.618.01 0.00 2,618.01 22 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000839 30000839 30000965 30000839 DESCRIPTION 2009728057 311158 BOOKS 2009727639 311158 BOOKS 5003883329 311740 AUDIO BOOKS 5003817852 311158 BOOKS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO ART DISC 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 CHECK NO 30000579 30000579 30000578 30000578 30000579 30000579 30000579 30000578 30000578 30000579 30000578 30000578 593023 B01478250 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33052441 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33032680 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33073081 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33101800 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33101830 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33060360 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33013641 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33052440 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33087370 311444 VIDEOS/CDS R27727090 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33067910 311444 VIDEOS/CDS VENDOR 205230 - BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 001-156110-652670-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 30.06 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 30.06 466.13 0.00 466.13 583.48 0.00 583.48 729.33 0.00 729.33 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 84,089.64 0.00 18.85 0.00 18.85 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 125.86 0.00 125.86 1,584.19 0.00 1,584.19 37.48 0.00 37.48 34.95 0.00 34.95 539.77 0.00 539.77 1,442.09 O. O0 1,442.09 209.70 0.00 209.70 59.96 O.OO 59.96 26.10 0,00 26.10 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 14.52 0.00 14.52 145.51 0.00 145.51 23 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000578 30000579 30000578 30000579 30000578 30000578 DESCRIPTION G33073080 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33060370 311444 VIDEOS/CDS G33000051 311444 VIDEOS/CDS B01672270 311444 VIDEOS/CDS B01085860 311444 VIDEOS/CDS R27579420 311444 VIDEOS/CDS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 001-156110-652670-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000999 593143 VENDOR 321340 - BANK AMERICA COMMERCIAL CARD 21002510 408-210151-652990-00000 311562 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 30000839 30000831 593016 VENDOR 198760 - BANK OF NEW YORK-CORPORATE TRUST 5906-98916 PAYING AGENT 202-939030-873100-00000 PAYING AGENT FEE FFCOLLIER 73 1992 SERIES ADMIN FEES 215-939030-873100-00000 COLLIER CAP 92 ADMIN FEES AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 15.76 0.00 15.76 182.19 0.00 182.19 CHECK NO 430071 593278 VENDOR 900050 - BARK ENGINEERING INC REF 365529 BARKS 113-000000-115420-00000 REF 365529 BARKS ENGINEERING 684,76 0.00 684.76 CHECK NO 30000698 593028 VENDOR 218330 - BAUDVILLE 900493 250401 SUPPLIES 001-122240-651110-00000 24.10 0.00 24.10 281.60 0.00 281.60 185.45 0.00 185.45 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,612.84 0.00 350.40 0.00 350.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 350.40 O.O0 275.00 0.00 275.00 0.00 350.96 0.00 350.96 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 625,96 0.00 10,00 0.00 10.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.00 0.00 126.40 0.00 126.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 126,40 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 593279 VENDOR 900050 - BAY COLONY GATEWAY INC 430057 REF 364542 BAY COLONY REF 364542 BAY COLONY 113-000000-115420-00000 161 11 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 593227 30000576 S057820 311443 AUDIOBOOKS 30000960 5058010 311443 BOOKS 30000576 231450 311443 AUDIOBOOKS VENDOR 361720 - BBC AUDIOBOOKS AMERICA 001-156110-652670-00000 001-156110-652670-00000 001-156110-652670-00000 PAGE VCHR NET 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 CHECK NO 592997 30001013 264102 311378 30001013 267795 VENDOR 174260 - BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 307-156111-766100-54001 TELEPHONE BOOKS 307-156111-766100-54001 311378 TELEPHONE BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.00 1,432.37 0.00 CHECK NO 592926 VENDOR 103560 - BERNAN ASSOCIATES 30000829 DEPOSIT 307-000000-155900-00000 DEPOSIT 1,056.62 0.00 CHECK NO 593074 VENDOR 272970 - BEST WESTERN 30001084 214714 R. KIPP 00-1216 30001084 214712 R, KIPP 00-1216 681-421190-634405-00000 681-421190-634405-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30000838 592877 VENDOR 1910 - BETTER ROADS, INC. 23441 111-163645-763110-00000 310987 EMERGENCY REPAIR 0.00 6.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,432.37 1,056.62 6.50 2,495.49 0.00 148.96 0.00 148.96 0.00 568.89 0.00 568.89 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 717.85 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,000. O0 3,000.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 300.00 0.00 10,302.39 0.00 10,302.39 25 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30000731 30000732 30000731 30000731 592955 C. SELLS 02-9960 C. SELLS 02-9960 02-9835 R. HINASOSA 311476 02-9835 R. HINOSOSA 02-10082 A. SMALA 02-10082 A. SMALA A. REDDING 02-10599 A. REDDING 02-10599 VENDOR 141230 - BIG CYPRESS ANIMAL CLINIC 610-155413-631970-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 10,302.39 CHECK NO 30000702 30000702 O.DO 75.00 0.00 75,00 65.00 0.00 65.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 CHECK NO 30000700 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 30001030 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 592954 VENDOR 140250 - BILL SMITH APPLIANCES 106611 001-122240-652996-00000 250600 A/C 106636 001-122240-652996-00000 250600 A/C CHECK TOTAL 0.00 280.00 CHECK NO 30001085 30001085 593238 VENDOR 365310 - BLEVINS REPAIR 772818 470-173443-634999-00000 250371 RELOCATING 0.00 381.10 0.00 381.10 0.00 237.15 0.00 237.15 VENDOR 2270 - BOARD OF CNTY COMMISSIONERS 001-000000-217210-00000 001-000000-217220-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 618.25 0.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 500.00 2,166.00 7,858.58 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7.79- O. O0 10,024.58 592878 PP#2 PP#2 592945 VENDOR 133300 - BOB TAYLOR CHEVROLET CM124442 521-122410-646425-00000 310126 SUPPLIES 1248091 521-122410-646425-00000 310126 SUPPLIES 10,024.58 7.79- 26 0.00 45.59 0.00 45.59 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001085 DESCRIPTION 124947 310126 SUPPLIES 30001085 125054 310126 SUPPLIES 30001085 125085 310126 SUPPLIES 30001085 124442 310126 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593302 VENDOR 900100 - BOBIE ROGERS 430076 R. KIPP 00-1216 R. KIPP 00-1216 681-421190-634405-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593233 VENDOR 364920 - BOMAR MARKETING. INC. 30001109 SEM22020 001-122240-654370-00000 311405 REGIST-DOVE,SIMPSON.EAGER 0.00 CHECK NO 592993 30000964 629017 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 627919 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 628381 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 627470 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 628393 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 628884 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 626606 310128 PARTS VOUCHER VENDOR 168720 - BONITA AUTO SUPPLY/NAPA 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 4.90 22.83 210.95 7.79 CHECK TOTAL 423.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,185.00 CHECK TOTAL 7.50 55.62 13.22- 83.61 3.31 323.26 203.14 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 27 VCHR NET 4.90 22.83 210.95 7.79 284.27 423.00 423.00 2.185.00 2,185.00 7.50 55.62 13.22- 83.61 3.31 323.26 203.14 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30000964 627467 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 627492 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 629063 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 628194 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 628397 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 626753 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 629047 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 627734 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 627477 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 628216 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 627729 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 627956 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 628389 310128 PARTS VOUCHER 30000964 627434 310128 PARTS VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001086 30001086 593031 VENDOR 222440 - BONITA VETERINARY CLINIC J. CONNORS 02-10166 610-155413-631970-00000 311571 J. CONNORS 02-10166 02-104805S. GARCIA 610-155413-631970-00000 311571 S. GARCIA 02-10480 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 10.12 13.56 38.92 19.45 14.76 252.56- 2.92 91.13 8.82 357.73 20.16 71.58 5.08 290.67 CHECK TOTAL 75.00 75.00 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 28 VCHR NET 10.12 13.56 38.92 19.45 14.76 252.56- 2.92 91.13 8.82 357.73 20.16 71.58 5.08 290.67 1.355.56 75.00 75.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30001086 02-9848 M. ESPARSA 311571 02-9848 M. ESPARSA 30001086 02-9787 J. KASSEL 311571 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593008 VENDOR 187560 - BOOKS ON TAPE INC. 30000701 4970486P 001-156145-652670-00000 250828 AUDIO BOOKS 30000701 4979523P 001-156145-652670-00000 250828 AUDIO BOOKS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 593043 VENDOR 242070 - BPR 30000710 EXP 11/30 250496 CERTIFICATE 312-163615-654210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593135 VENDOR 318160 - BRADANNA INC. 30001169 10549 311419 LABOR. 001-122240-646110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001131 593263 VENDOR 365880 - BRANDON DAVIDSON REIMB CLASS D LICENSE 408-253212-649010-00000 251139 REIMB CLASS D LICENSE 0.00 CHECK NO 30001120 593181 VENDOR 343380 - BRYANT ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. SMARTINEZ 70921534258 191-138785-884200-44200 70921534258 SMARTINEZ 311730 0.00 CHECK NO 30000633 593106 VENDOR 295300 - BUMPER TO BUMPER I293991 521-122410-646425-00000 311619 PARTS 0.00 AMT NET 65.00 75. O0 CHECK TOTAL 41.60 57.60 CHECK TOTAL 230.00 CHECK TOTAL 5,401.24 CHECK TOTAL 25.25 CHECK TOTAL 2,770.00 CHECK TOTAL 12.38 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 29 VCHR NET 65.00 75.00 290.00 41.60 57.60 99.20 230.00 230.00 5,401.24 5,401.24 25.25 25.25 2,770. O0 2,770.00 12.38 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000708 30000629 30000630 30000631 30000633 30000632 30000631 30000631 30000632 30000630 30000631 30000633 30000631 30000633 30000633 30000633 30000631 DESCRIPTION I289760 250909 FLASH TUBE I293885 311042 PARTS I293934 310129 PARTS I293786 310129 PARTS I293839 311619 PARTS I293611 311619 PARTS I293742 310129 PARTS I293522 310129 PARTS I293501 311619 PARTS I293716 310129 PARTS I293509 310129 PARTS I293717 311619 PARTS I293633 310129 PARTS I293995 311619 PARTS I293740 311619 PARTS I293892 311619 PARTS I293692 310129 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163620-652990-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 16t 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 26.48 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 26.48 33.39 0.00 33.39 126.28 0.00 126.28 24.30 0.00 24.30 14.96 0.00 14.96 6.67 0.00 3.62 0.00 4.33 0.00 2.97 0.00 6.67 3.62 4.33 2.97 17.37 0.00 17.37 8.48 0.00 7.86 0.00 7.94 0.00 8.48 7.86 7.94 12.38 0.00 12.38 7.19 0.00 7.19 127.66 0.00 127.66 12.58 0.00 12.58 30 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000630 I293542 310129 PARTS 30000633 I293790 311619 PARTS 30000628 I293901 310129 PARTS 30000630 I293541 310129 PARTS 30000629 C26822 311042 PARTS 30000632 I293630 311619 PARTS 30000631 I293685 310129 PARTS 30000632 I293504 311619 PARTS 30000632 I293322 311619 PARTS 30000632 I293492 311619 PARTS 30000631 I293500 310129 PARTS 30000632 I293806 311619 PARTS 30000632 I293609 311619 PARTS 30000631 I293440 310129 PARTS 30000632 I293680 311619 PARTS 30000631 I293605 310129 PARTS 30000632 I293590 311619 PARTS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 84.85 O. O0 7.82 0.00 3.79 0.00 PAGE 31 VCHR NET 84.85 7.82 3.79 186.51 0.00 186.51 10.00- 0.00 9.97 0.00 1.29 0.00 10.00- 9.97 1.29 13.85 0.00 13.85 10.17 0.00 10.17 8.55 0.00 8.55 39.09 0.00 39.09 9.70 0.00 9.70 35.12 0.00 35.12 2.49 O. O0 2.49 13.46 0.00 13.46 4.33 0.00 4.33 25.07 0.00 25.07 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000630 I293997 310129 PARTS 30000633 I293846 311619 PARTS 30000631 I293536 310129 PARTS 30000633 I293739 311619 PARTS 30000631 I293544 310129 PARTS 30000633 I293842 311619 PARTS 30000631 I293642 310129 PARTS 30000628 I293897 310129 PARTS 30000632 I293802 311619 PARTS 30000631 I293171 310129 PARTS 30000630 I293753 310129 PARTS 30000630 I293567 310129 PARTS 30000629 I293851 311042 PARTS 30000630 C26760 310129 PARTS 30000630 I293994 310129 PARTS 30000630 I293618 310129 PARTS 30000633 I293804 311619 PARTS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 O.O0 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1.44 0.00 PAGE 32 VCHR NET 1.44 28.46 0.00 28.46 51.11 0.00 51.11 31.35 0.00 31.35 100.20 0.00 100.20 16.69 0.00 16.69 20.84 0.00 20.84 28.05 0.00 28.05 7.13 0.00 7.13 18.19 0.00 18.19 11.83 0.00 11.83 69.19 0.00 69.19 31.99 0.00 31.99 200.00- 0.00 200.00- 21.86 0.00 21.86 24.03 0.00 24.03 9.09 0.00 9.09 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000630 30000630 30000630 30000628 30000633 30000632 30000630 30000630 30000632 30000631 30000631 30000633 30000632 30000632 30000630 30000633 30000633 DESCRIPTION I293545 310129 PARTS I293879 310129 PARTS I293646 310129 PARTS I293634 310129 PARTS I293583 311619 PARTS I293803 311619 PARTS I293517 310129 PARTS I293183 310129 PARTS I293560 311619 PARTS I293511 310129 PARTS I293493 310129 PARTS I293844 311619 PARTS I293549 311619 PARTS I293395 311619 PARTS I293631 310129 PARTS I293843 311619 PARTS I293845 311619 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 14. O0 O. 00 PAGE VCHR NET 14.00 69.19 0.00 69.19 20.84 0.00 20.84 7.94 0.00 7.94 15.47 0.00 15.47 9.09 0.00 9.09 73.66 0.00 73.66 15.66 0.00 15.66 17.04 0.00 17.04 1.77 0.00 1.77 202.40 0.00 202.40 29.42 0.00 29.42 16.18 0.00 16.18 10.17 0.00 10.17 7.94 0.00 6.00 0.00 7.94 6.00 26.69 0.00 26.69 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30000721 592971 VENDOR 159780 - BURZYNSKI LAW OFFICE, P.A. 12684 681-421190-631020-00000 310941 GUARDIAN SHIP 0.00 CHECK NO 593007 30000627 1361921 311372 BOOKS 30000627 1361922 311372 BOOKS 30000627 1351300 311372 BOOKS 30000577 1372484 311372 CHILDRENS BOOKS 30000577 1371320 311372 CHILDRENS BOOKS 30000577 1371321 311372 CHILDRENS BOOKS 30000627 1361920 311372 BOOKS VENDOR 186290 - BWI/BOOK WHOLESALERS, INC. 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 355-156190-766100-54260 AHT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,200.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 34 VCHR NET 1.717.81 2,200.00 CHECK NO 593035 VENDOR 230790 - C.E.D. INC. 30001137 4977-196114 311416 SUPPLIES 30001137 4977-195991 311416 SUPPLIES 001-122240-652991-00000 001-122240-652991-00000 2,200.00 0.00 190.36 0.00 190.36 CHECK NO 30001125 593218 VENDOR 359510 - CARLTON FIELDS. P.A. 273293 411-273511-763100-70054 311809 LEGAL SERVICES 0.00 11.93 0.00 11.93 0.00 168.59 0.00 168.59 0.00 88.37 0.00 88.37 0.00 1,049.77 0.00 1,049.77 0.00 722.75 0.00 722.75 0.00 4.76 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 4.76 2.236.53 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 0.00 15.50 0.00 15.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 33.50 3.838.42 0.00 0.00 3.838.42 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3.838.42 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 592935 30001126 30001126 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 610-155413-631970-00000 610-155413-631970-00000 DESCRIPTION VENDOR 117060 - CAT CARE CLINIC 02-10603 NSCHARICH 311574 ANIMAL FEES 02-10355 DREABURN 311574 ANIMAL FEES 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30001155 593015 VENDOR 196910 - CECIL'S COPY EXPRESS 13991 001-155410-647110-00000 311188 COPIES PAGE CHECK NO 30000687 592879 VENDOR 3050 - CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 707343 001-122240-652510-00000 250601 ANTISEPTIC VCHR NET CHECK NO 30001152 592977 VENDOR 161760 - CERTIFIED SLINGS INC. 276144 521-122410-646425-00000 276144 SUPPLIES 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 30001146 592850 VENDOR 3210 - CHARLES GRIFFIN A RAMOS 10/02 RENT 001-155930-634153-00000 AND 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 30001132 592948 VENDOR 133880 - CHECKPOINT 209929 251176 MONITORING 11/02 001-156110-634999-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 120.00 CHECK NO 30001134 592880 VENDOR #176 9/25 #176 9/25 3360 - CITY OF EVERGLADES 198-157430-643400-00000 1,125.00 0,00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,125. O0 1,125.00 0.00 153.79 0.00 153,79 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 153.79 0.00 74.75 0.00 74.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 74.75 0.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 450.00 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 18.00 0.00 69.22 0,00 69.22 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001153 30001129 592881 VENDOR 3390 - CITY OF NAPLES 50221 129220 7/25-9/24 408-233351-643400-00000 50221 129220 7/25-9/24 3633 9/02 521-122450-652410-00000 311741 FUEL 9/02 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30000771 593184 VENDOR 344750 - CLARA E BERON 10/10/02 8-11:00 CBERON 10/10/02 8-11:00 CBERON 681-431590-634402-00000 PAGE CHECK NO 30001133 592970 VENDOR 158740 - CLERK OF COURTS 2715 10/7/02 198-157440-634999-00000 250831 FEE FALSE ALARM VCHR NET 69.22 CHECK NO 593108 30001045 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 296230 - CLERK OF COURTS - HIGHLAND COUNTY 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 13.45 0.00 13,45 CHECK NO 593004 VENDOR 182370 - COASTAL APPRAISAL SERVICES 30001124 30331 313-163673-631990-60171 207067 IMPACT FEE 3,391.29 0.00 CHECK NO 593203 30001053 PP #2 PP#2 VENDOR 350590 - COLLECTION SERVICES CENTER 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000688 593075 VENDOR 274740 - COLLEGIATE PACIFIC 0118076-IN 111-156332-646315-00000 250088 POLY CAP ROLL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,391.29 3,404.74 0.00 48.00 0.00 48.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 48.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 0.00 177.62 0.00 177.62 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 177.62 1,890.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1,890.00 1,890.00 0.00 316.24 0.00 316.24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 316.24 0.00 967.00 0.00 967.00 36 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO ANT DISC CHECK NO 30000588 30000588 593161 VENDOR 332890 - COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, 1756 111-156349-649035-00000 250126 FIRE ALARM CITATION 2039 111-156349-649035-00000 250126 FIRE ALARM CITATION 161 1 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 30000713 592958 VENDOR 142550 - COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 2002100543 113-138900-322110-00000 CC SCHOOL BOARD VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 30001135 30000832 592923 VENDOR 100430 - COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 7942 001-122240-634999-00000 311430 SVS 9/02 LOCAL HEROS 490-000000-206903-00000 LOCAL HEROS PAGE VCHR NET 967.00 CHECK NO 30001122 592854 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20030003 TAGS/TITLES 521-122410-649010-00000 AND 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 30001123 592855 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20030002 TAGS/TITLES 521-122410- 649010- 00000 AND 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 30000848 592852 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR TAXES PARCEL 144 331-163650-649050-60018 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 3.04 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 3.04 3.04 0.00 685.20 0.00 685.20 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 785.20 0.00 52.85 0.00 52.85 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 52.85 0.00 52.85 0.00 52.85 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 52.85 0.00 73.59 0.00 73.59 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 73.59 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001121 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 592853 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20030001 TAGS/TITLES 521-122410-649010-00000 AND AMT DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 30000847 592851 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR TAXES PARCEL 154 331-163650-649050-60018 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001113 592890 02700614800 9/26 02700614800 9/26 02700216700 9/26 02700216700 9/26 02700307000 9/26 02700307000 9/26 02700311800 9/26 02700311800 9/26 03600100500 9/30 03600100500 9/30 02700120300 9/25 02700120300 9/25 02700703700 9/27 02700703700 9/27 02700700500 9/27 02700700500 9/27 03600100801 9/30 03600100801 9/30 02700302300 9/26 02700302300 9/26 02700313800 9/26 02700313800 9/26 03901644700 10/1 03901644700 10/1 VENDOR 3690 - COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY BILLING 109-182901-634253-00000 109-182901-634253-00000 109-182901-634253-00000 109-182901-634253-00000 001-156170-643400-00000 109-182901-634253-00000 109-182901-634253-00000 109-182901-634253-00000 111-156332-643400-00000 109-182901-634253-00000 109-182901-634253-00000 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 52.85 CHECK TOTAL 10.27 CHECK TOTAL 104.60 337.95 27.75 6.30 195.06 303.50 43.50 87.00 12. O0 149.45 73.40 48.30 '1. VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 52.85 52.85 10.27 10.27 104.60 337.95 27.75 6.30 195.06 303.50 43.50 87.00 12. O0 149.45 73.40 48.30 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001028 02700412600 02700412600 30001113 03610634100 03610634100 30001028 02700711000 02700711000 30001028 02700715300 02700715300 30001028 02700309200 02700309200 DESCRIPTION 9/26 9/26 10/1 10/1 9/26 9/26 9/27 9/27 9/26 9/26 30001028 0270050100059/27 02700501000 9/27 30001028 02700711600 9/26 02700711600 9/26 30001028 02700704100 9/26 02700704100 9/26 30001028 02700300901 9/26 02700300901 9/26 30001028 02700700200 9/27 02700700200 9/27 30001113 03600296900 10/1 03600296900 10/1 30001028 02700300300 9/26 02700300300 9/26 30001028 02700703500 9/27 02700703500 9/27 30001028 02700100300 9/25 02700100300 9/25 30001028 02700709300 9/26 02700709300 9/26 30001028 02700303900 9/26 02700303900 9/26 30001113 03901643700 10/1 03901643700 10/1 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0,00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0,00 161 AMT NET 61.05 2,345.75 8.90 6.95 6.95 10.85 12.15 8.90 172.85 43.50 27.84 44.15 43.50 4.35 14.75 9.55 48.30 VCHR DISC 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 39 VCHR NET 61.05 2.345,75 8.90 6.95 6,95 10.85 12.15 8.90 172.85 43.50 27.84 44.15 43.50 4.35 14.75 9.55 48.30 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001028 30001028 30001113 30001113 30001028 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001113 30001028 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 DESCRIPTION 02700706600 9/26 02700706600 9/26 02700310500 9/26 02700310500 9/26 03619005700 9/27 03619005700 9/27 03901641100 10/1 03901641100 10/1 02700512800 9/27 02700512800 9/27 03900160900 10/1 03900160900 10/1 02701074300 9/27 02701074300 9/27 02700305500 9/26 02700305500 9/26 02700715900 9/27 02700715900 9/27 03902720800 10/2 03902720800 10/2 02700502600 9/27 02700502600 9/27 06102553000 9/18 06102553000 9/18 02700413500 9/26 02700413500 9/26 02700615100 9/26 02700615100 9/26 02700121200 9/25 02700121200 9/25 02700301900 9/26 02700301900 9/26 02700306500 9/26 02700306500 9/26 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 408-233351-643400-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-106010-643200-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 12.15 O. O0 12.15 6.95 0.00 6.95 69.12 0.00 69.12 141.00 0.00 141.00 23.90 0.00 23.90 30.00 0.00 30.00 43.50 0.00 43.50 87.70 0.00 87.70 11.50 0.00 11.50 191.82 0.00 191.82 13.45 0.00 13.45 65.41 O.O0 65.41 313.25 0.00 313.25 286.60 0.00 286.60 243.00 0.00 243.00 4.35 0.00 4.35 8.25 O. O0 8.25 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001028 30001028 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 DESCRIPTION 02700705700 9/26 02700705700 9/26 02700201200 9/27 02700201200 9/27 03901641200 10/1 03901641200 10/1 02700413800 9/26 02700413800 9/26 02700700700 9/27 02700700700 9/27 02700300402 9/26 02700300402 9/26 02700716800 9/27 02700716800 9/27 02700316100 9/26 02700316100 9/26 02700300502 9/26 02700300502 9/26 02700700100 9/27 02700700100 9/27 02700312900 9/26 02700312900 9/26 02700605500 9/26 02700605500 9/26 02700308100 9/26 02700308100 9/26 02700308600 9/26 02700308600 9/26 02700100400 9/25 02700100400 9/25 02700507100 9/27 02700507100 9/27 02700301200 9/26 02700301200 9/26 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0,00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 4,35 0.00 PAGE 41 VCHR NET 4.35 43.50 0.00 43.50 1,899.20 0.00 1,899.20 550.50 0.00 550,50 110.45 0.00 110.45 55.85 0.00 55.85 177.40 0.00 177.40 5.00 0.00 5.00 220.15 0.00 220.15 43.50 0.00 43.50 6.30 0.00 6.30 44.64 0.00 44.64 220.30 0.00 220.30 14.10 0.00 14.10 5.65 0.00 7.60 0.00 5.65 7.60 176.75 0.00 176,75 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001028 30001028 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001113 DESCRIPTION 02700101000 9/25 02700101000 9/25 02700100100 9/25 02700100100 9/25 03600100901 9/30 03600100901 9/30 02700100600 9/25 02700100600 9/25 02700700900 9/27 02700700900 9/27 03901644200 10/1 03901644200 10/1 02700716400 9/27 02700716400 9/27 02700303000 9/26 02700303000 9/26 03900149600 10/2 03900149600 10/2 02700605700 9/26 02700605700 9/26 02700503800 9/27 02700503800 9/27 02700703800 9/27 02700703800 9/27 02700304900 9/26 02700304900 9/26 02700431600 9/26 02700431600 9/26 02700504500 9/27 02700504500 9/27 02700413100 9/26 02700413100 9/26 03600297000 10/1 03600297000 10/1 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 103.95 0.00 PAGE 42 VCHR NET 103.95 17.40 0.00 17.40 2,762.16 0.00 2. 762.16 62.35 0.00 62.35 43.50 0.00 43.50 30.60 0.00 30.60 9.55 0.00 6.95 0.00 9.55 6.95 26.40 0.00 26.40 285.95 0.00 285.95 16.05 0.00 16.05 178.70 0.00 178.70 7.60 0.00 7.60 257.28 0.00 257.28 117.60 0.00 117.60 11.50 0.00 11.50 555.00 0.00 555.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001113 30001113 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 30001028 DESCRIPTION 07806012500 9/23 07806012500 9/23 02700305800 9/26 02700305800 9/26 02700500100 9/27 02700500100 9/27 02700708600 9/26 02700708600 9/26 02700605600 9/26 02700605600 9/26 03904895300 10/2 03904895300 10/2 06102727101 9/18 06102727101 9/18 02700100800 9/25 02700100800 9/25 02700304500 9/26 02700304500 9/26 02700411300 9/26 02700411300 9/26 02700307300 9/26 02700307300 9/26 02700302000 9/26 02700302000 9/26 CHECK NO 593223 30001128 004002 311197 30001128 3576 311197 30001128 003990 311197 30001128 003989 311197 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233351-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 001-106010-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 VENDOR 360920 - COLLIER TIRE COMMERCIAL CENTER 521-122410-646425-00000 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 26.40 0.00 9.55 0.00 9.55 0.00 PAGE 43 VCHR NET 26.40 9.55 9.55 12.80 0.00 12.80 219.65 0.00 219.65 373.75 0.00 373.75 92.98 0.00 92.98 43.50 0.00 43.50 57.15 0.00 57.15 113.70 0.00 113.70 6.95 0.00 6.95 118.90 0.00 118.90 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14,973.71 50.38 0.00 50.38 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 337.92 0.00 337.92 838.10 0.00 838.10 0.00 476.14 0.00 476.14 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001128 003516 311197 30001128 003927 311197 30001128 003970 311197 30001128 003966 311197 30001128 003847 311197 30001128 3656 311197 30001128 003880 311197 30001128 003907 311197 30001128 003511 311197 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000428 593039 VENDOR 235530 - COLOR TEC COPY CENTER 6173 334-163654-651210-60134 205696 COPIES CHECK NO 30001197 30000686 592933 VENDOR 115280 - COMMERCIAL LAND MAINTENANCE 996531 310921 LAWN CARE 001-126334-646314-00000 996653 250046 MOWING 001-126334-646314-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 215.07 0.00 PAGE 44 CHECK NO 30001147 592857 VENDOR 270450 - COMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIPS, INC E HYPPOLITE 10/02 RENT 001-155930-634153-00000 AND VCHR NET 215.07 404.80 0.00 404.80 958.08 0.00 958.08 118.80 0.00 118.80 1,152.78 0.00 1,152.78 323.50 0.00 323.50 196.91 0.00 196.91 104.28 0.00 104.28 45.62 0.00 45.62 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,222.38 0.00 53.98 0.00 53.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 53.98 17,695.16 0.00 0.00 17.695.16 0.00 240.00 0.00 240.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17,935.16 0.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 30001138 592882 VENDOR 001256 311431 SERVICES 3530 CHECK NO 30001198 593084 VENDOR 281620 211095 310747 REPAIRS CHECK NO 430085 593268 VENDOR 900030 10/4 TRVL P/D C.WHITEWAY 10/4 TRVL P/D C.WHITEWAY CHECK NO 30001182 592858 VENDOR 325820 10/2002 ADMIN FEES AND CHECK NO 30001150 593034 VENDOR 230460 36607647 311456 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 30000689 30001151 30000762 30001151 593080 VENDOR 276650 36607637 250121 VOICE RECORDER 36338752 310015 SUPPLIES 29942023 29942023 CREDIT 36411389 310015 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CONDITIONED AIR CORP 001-122240-652997-00000 161 1 CONSOLIDATED POWER SERVICES, INC. 408-253211-634999-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CONSUELA WHITEWAY 111-178980-640200-00000 PAGE 45 CORPORATE BENEFIT SERVICES 517-121640-631153-00000 VCHR NET 450.00 CORPORATE EXPRESS 001-155410-651110-00000 0.00 384.40 0.00 384,40 CORPORATE EXPRESS 111-156341-651910-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 384.40 8,701.74 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8,701.74 8.701.74 0.00 26.85 0.00 26.85 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 26.85 30,112.25 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30.112.25 30,112.25 0.00 272.91 0.00 272.91 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 272.91 0.00 69.97 0.00 69.97 111-138317-651110-00000 0.00 001-144110-651110-00000 0.00 111-138317-651110-00000 0.00 13.82 0.00 13.82 7.72- 0.00 7.72- 153.20 0.00 153.20 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001149 DESCRIPTION 36862934 310015 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-138317-651110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001148 593180 VENDOR 342490 - CORPOP, ATE EXPRESS 36571946 198-157410-651110-00000 311294 SUPPLIES 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 8.05 0.00 CHECK NO 30001176 593229 VENDOR 362440 - COUNTRY INN AND SUITES BY CARLSON CON#1268DJG G.SANTOS 10/2 001-121148-640300-00000 251169 CON#1268DJG G.SANTOS 10/27-30 PAGE CHECK NO 30001205 593198 VENDOR 348090 - COUNTY WASTE, INC. 1775 109-182901-643300-00000 310815 WASTE DISPOSAL VCHR NET 8.05 CHECK NO 30000778 30000779 593091 VENDOR 288320 - CPOC REALTY, L.L.C. 0CT-2002 1906-17-CU 113-138900-646360-00000 0CT-2002 311935 0CT-2002 1906-7-CU 113-138900-646360-00000 0CT-2002 311659 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 237.32 0.00 8.40 0.00 8.40 CHECK NO 593166 VENDOR 335640 - CROWN PLAZA HOTEL 30000887 CON#66105016/66104659 001-122240-654370-00000 250411 M.CALLIS R.DOVE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 592959 VENDOR 144930 - CUES, INC. 30001194 187715 310379 PARTS 408-233351-646510-00000 8.40 0.00 207.00 0.00 207.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 207.00 0.00 1,750.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,750.50 1,750.50 0.00 303.94 0.00 303.94 0.00 159.12 0.00 159.12 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 463.06 0.00 196.00 0.00 196.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 196.00 9,580.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 9,580.00 9,580.00 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 592891 30001141 805119 310681 30001136 240291 311184 30001145 257048 311174 30001140 206615 311285 30001143 207258 310524 30001130 773762 311412 30001144 828111 310995 30001142 731174 310831 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 4400 - CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 001-138710-652990-00000 001-155410-652990-00000 001-100110-634999-00000 001-144210-634999-00000 408-233312-652990-00000 001-122240-652510-00000 101-163630-652990-00000 111-156332-634999-00000 9/24 BOI-~LED WATER 9/24 WATER 9/24 BOTTLED WATER 9/24 BOTTLED WATER 9/24 BO1-FLED WATER 9/24 BOTTLED WATER 9/24 BOI~-LED WATER 9/24 BOI~-LED WATER ART DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30000788 593083 VENDOR 281390 - DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC 09570 414-263611-763100-73922 414-263614-763100-73922 205052 SVS FOR LIFT STATIONS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30000594 30001027 592999 VENDOR 174930 - DAVID B FOX 8/26-10/02/02 310698 KARATE 9/4-10/14/02 311489 I(~J~qTE 111-156381-634999-00000 111-156395-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30000907 593024 VENDOR 205380 - DAVID WEIGEL 10/9-11 P/D D.WEIGEL 10/9-11 P/D D.WEIGEL 001-100510-640310-00000 0.00 161 AMT NET 20.79 77.22 2.97 11.91 23.76 29.70 11.88 53.30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16.533.00 CHECK TOTAL 390.00 695.50 CHECK TOTAL 21.00 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 47 VCHR NET 20.79 77.22 2.97 11.91 23.76 29.70 11.88 53.30 231.53 16.533.00 16.533.00 390.00 695.50 1.085.50 21.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 430056 593303 VENDOR 900100 - DEBORAH SIMKINS D.SIMKINS 01-1812CFKUHNS 681-421190-634405-00000 D.SIMKINS 01-1812-CF (R.KUHNS) 161 1 CHECK NO 430090 593269 VENDOR 900030 - DEBORAH WIGHT 9/3-9/7/02 P/D D.WRIGHT 9/3-9/02 P/D D. WRIGHT 001-100130-640300-00000 ~ NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001200 30000595 593010 VENDOR 193310 - DEHART ALARM SYSTEMS, INC. 14476 311016 MONITORING 111-156332-634999-00000 111-156334-634999-00000 001-156363-634999-00000 111-156332-646970-00000 111-156334-646970-00000 001-156363-646970-00000 14697 250086 SEC.SYSTEM E NAPLES PARK 111-156332-652910-00000 PAGE VCHR NET 21.00 CHECK NO 30000584 593159 VENDOR 332420 - DELL COMPUTER CORP 118056507 313-162111-764900-00000 101-163651-764900-00000 207456 FLAT PANEL MONITOR 0.00 84.00 0,00 84.00 CHECK NO 30001060 30000784 593056 VENDOR 256190 - DELL MARKETING L.P. 119730985 118-144211-764210-34300 207177 OPTIPLEX COMP. 116327942 001-172910-764900-00000 207370 OPTIPLEX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 592892 VENDOR 4970 - DEMCO 84.00 0.00 15.88 0.00 15,88 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.88 0.00 3,312.00 0.00 1,008.00 0.00 864.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 5,184. O0 0.00 495.00 0.00 495.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,400.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0,00 2,330.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,165.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,679. O0 1,400.00 1,400.00 2,330.00 1,165.00 3,495.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000769 DESCRIPTION 1128994 250643 SUPPL. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156175-652610-00000 0.00 001-156175-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000774 30000773 593193 VENDOR 347280 - DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL R.MCLAUGHLIN 408-233352-649010-00000 251037 APP.RICHARD MCLAUGHLIN REG.FUZI,MACDONALD.SMI1-FE 408-233312-649010-00000 251132 WASTEWATER TRTMNT CERT. 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 615.27 44.70 0.00 CHECK NO 30000851 30001023 30000850 30001186 592972 VENDOR 160920 - DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES 33-4295 7/02 FAC. 33-4295 7/02 FAC. 001-122240-641900-00000 33-4302 7/02 FAC. 33-4302 7/02 FAC. 001-122240-641900-00000 3J-4364 8/02 PARK&REC 3J-4364 8/02 P & R 111-156341-641900-00000 26-0589 8/02 26-0589 8/02 SUNCOM 001-000000-202800-00000 PAGE VCHR NET 659.97 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 659.97 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK NO 30000785 592956 VENDOR 141790 - DILLER & BROWN D29133 412-273511-763100-70094 412-273512-763100-70094 206885 BUTTERFLY VALVES 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 CHECK NO 30001019 593141 VENDOR 321130 - DIRECT TV 0026-016746794 311985 ANN.SUB. 118-144211-652990-34300 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 400.00 CHECK NO 30000589 593069 VENDOR 265230 - DIRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ASSOCIATES 59621 307-156111-766100-54001 311387 PHONE BOOKS 0.00 23.56 0.00 23.56 0.00 235.60 0.00 235.60 0.00 23.93 0.00 23.93 6.855.15 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,848.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6.855.15 7.138.24 13,848. O0 13,848.00 0.00 339.99 0.00 339.99 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 339.99 0.00 70.12 0.00 70.12 49 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000589 DESCRIPTION 59386 311387 PHONE BOOKS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 307-156111-766100-54001 0.00 CHECK NO 30000940 592984 VENDOR 165960 - DISTRICT ll4ENTY 30TH PYMT 001-144710-634108-00000 310007 30TH PYNMT 0.00 CHECK NO 30001201 30001201 30001201 593219 S-15423 310221 MAINT.WELLS S-15422 310221 MAINT.WELLS S-15424 310221 MAINT.WELLS VENDOR 359610 - DIVERSIFIED DRILLING 408-253212-634999-00000 408-253212-634999-00000 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001021 592947 VENDOR 133560 - DONNA WINN PEI-FING ZOO & PONY RIDES 250626 COUNTY PICNIC 001-100190-634999-00000 161 1 CHECK NO 30001040 592987 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 166490 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 001-000000-218800-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 98.98 0.00 CHECK NO 30001015 30000767 30000767 592990 2743106 2743106 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2815510 2815510 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2804635 2804635 COPIES.RECORDING,ETC. VENDOR 166510 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 313-163673-649030-60134 111-156310-651210-00000 113-138320-649030-00000 PAGE VCHR NET 98.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 169.10 30,208.33 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10,124.59 0.00 10,673.38 0.00 12.458.60 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30,208.33 30,208.33 10,124.59 10,673.38 12,458.60 33,256.57 0.00 800.00 0.00 800.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 800.00 1,068.94 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 1,068.94 1,068.94 9.00 4.00 0.00 120.70 0.00 120.70 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000767 30000767 30000768 30000767 30000767 30000767 30001015 30000767 30000767 30000767 30000767 30000768 30000767 30001015 30000767 30001015 30000767 DESCRIPTION 2813395 2813395 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2802040 2802040 COPIES.RECORDING.ETC. 12386 Q.BILL.JUL-SEPT/02 1238655 QUART.BILL JUL-SEPT/02 2809919 2809919 COPIES.RECORDING.ETC. 2724060/2724053 2724060/272053 COPIES,RECORDING 2800424 2800424 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2815442 2815442 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2804578 2804578 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2807048 2807048 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2805675 2805675 COPIES.RECORDING,ETC. 2815138 2815138 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 12391 JUL-SEP/02 Q.BILLIN 1239155 QUART.BILL JUL-SEPT/02 2815118 2815118 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2818338 2818338 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2807682 2807682 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2818336 2818336 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2812343 2812343 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 681-431590-651210-00000 0.00 408-210105-654110-00000 0.00 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 331-163650-651210-00000 0.00 408-210151-649030-00000 0.00 313-163673-649030-60018 0.00 473-173413-649030-00000 0.00 331-163650-649030-62071 0.00 325-172940-649030-51101 0.00 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 113-138900-631820-00000 0.00 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 313-163673-649030-60018 0.00 681-421190-634401-00000 0.00 313-163673-649030-60018 0.00 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 14. O0 O. O0 1 PAGE 51 VCHR NET 14.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 23.00- 0.00 5.00 0.00 23.00- 5.00 61.50 0.00 61.50 40.50 0.00 40.50 43.50 0.00 43.50 34.50 0.00 34.50 72.00 0.00 72.00 338.10 0.00 338.10 5.00 0.00 5.00 135.00 0.00 135.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 42.50 0.00 42.50 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000767 30001015 30001015 30000767 30000767 30000768 30000767 30000767 30000767 DESCRIPTION 2814931 2814931COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2815443 2815443 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2743105 2743105 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2814932 2814932 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2807047 2807047 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 12195 Q.BILL,OCT-DEC/01 1219555 QUART.BILL OCT-DEC/01 2813365 2813365 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2810812 2810812 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2807685 2807685 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. CHECK NO 30000786 30000787 30000787 30000787 30000787 30000786 30000787 592985 VENDOR 166220 - E. B. SIMMONDS 13315 205029 EL.SVS 13294 311090 EL.SVS 13295 311090 EL.SVS 13296 311090 EL.SVS 13313 311090 EL.SVS 13324 205029 EL.SVS 13291-02 311090 EL.SVS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 313-163673-633011-60018 0.00 313-163673-649030-60018 0.00 313-163673-649030-60134 0.00 331-163650-633011-60018 0.00 325-172940-649030-51101 0.00 113-138912-631820-00000 0.00 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 681-421190-634401-00000 0.00 313-163673-763100-60172 0.00 101-163630-646510-00000 0.00 101-163630-646510-00000 0.00 101-163630-646510-00000 0.00 101-163630-646510-00000 0.00 313-163673-763100-60172 0.00 101-163630-646510-00000 0.00 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 107.50 0.00 VCHR NET 107.50 55.50 0.00 55.50 332.50 0.00 332.50 107.50 0.00 107.50 44.60 0.00 44.60 394.75 0.00 394.75 67.50 0.00 67.50 6.00 0.00 6.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7,452.07 0.00 2,985.40 0.00 1,771.00 0.00 1,472.80 O. O0 3,171.00 0.00 1,615.00 0.00 7,538.00 0.00 2,329.15 7,452.07 2,985.40 1,771.00 1,472.80 3,171.00 1,615.00 7,538.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000787 13232 311090 EL.SVS 30000787 13292 311090 EL.SVS 30000786 13194 205029 EL.SVS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163630-646510-00000 0.00 101-163630-646510-00000 0.00 313-163673-763100-60172 0.00 CHECK NO 30001061 592980 VENDOR 163810 - E. B. SIMMONS ELECTRICAL INC. 13259 301-120435-763100-52525 311167 EL.SVS 0.00 CHECK NO 30000781 592960 VENDOR 145150 - EAST NAPLES FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT LOCAL HEROES 490-000000-209201-00000 LOCAL HEROES CONTRIBUTION 161 CHECK NO 30001020 30001020 30001020 30001020 592940 02-10472 P.AMANDIS 311671 02-10472 P.AMANDIS 02-9647 K.GRACE 311671 02-9647 K.GRACE 02-8643 C.MIDKIFF 311671 02-8643 C.MIDKIFF 02-10566 B.HAUSLER 311671 02-10566 B.HAUSLER VENDOR 123830 - EASTSIDE ANIMAL CLINIC 610-155413-631970-00000 610-155413-631970-00000 610-155413-631970-00000 610-155413-631970-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1,423.00 0.00 5,420.20 0.00 2,584.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001199 592991 VENDOR 168170 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 03-02 001-138760-882100-00000 310944 PAYROLL 3,519.00 0.00 CHECK NO 593257 VENDOR 365790 - EDWARD HUTCHESON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 1,423.00 5,420.20 2,584.00 35,432.47 3,519.00 3,519.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 230.00 12,529.84 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 12.529.84 12,529.84 53 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000883 DESCRIPTION 9/24 P/D TRVL E.HUTCHESON 9/24 P/D TRVL E. HUTCHESON COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163640-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001025 30001025 592998 VENDOR 174350 - ELITE FIRE & SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC 19523 521-122410-646425-00000 310061 SUPPL. 19584 521-122410-646425-00000 310061 SUPPL. AMT NET VCHR DISC 21.00 O. O0 PAGE CHECK NO 30001022 593088 VENDOR 284520 - ENGLE HOMES OF SOUTHWEST FLA., INC. REF.365481 113-000000-115420-00000 REF.ENGLE HOMES 7791 BERKSHIRE VCHR NET 21.00 CHECK NO 430037 593280 VENDOR 900050 - ENGLE HOMES/SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. REF.ENGLE HOMES 362244 113-000000-115420-00000 REF.ENGLE HOMES 7811 BERKSHIRE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.00 CHECK NO 430036 593281 VENDOR 900050 - ENGLE HOMES/SOUTHWEST FLORIDA,INC. REF.ENGLE HOMES 362243 113-000000-115420-00000 REF.ENGLE HOMES 7813 BERKSHIRE 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 30000876 593258 VENDOR 365810 - ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECH OF TAMPA REGIST. 10/24-25 G.YANDA 408-233350-654360-00000 251035 REGIST 10/24-25 G.YANDA 0.00 190.00 0.00 190.00 CHECK NO 430035 593282 VENDOR 900050 - ERIC CHRISTOPHER BURRIS REF.PARK ERIC BURRIS 670-000000-220010-00000 REF.PARKS ERIC C BURRIS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 265.00 0.00 214.80 0.00 214.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 214.80 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 35.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 115.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30.00 54 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001024 30001024 30001024 30001024 592894 231973 310134 MOTOR OILS 231824 DISC. 310134 MOTOR OILS 231824 310134 MOTOR OILS 231824 DISC. 310134 MOTOR OILS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 6120 - EVANS OIL COMPANY 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC PAGE 55 VCHR NET CHECK NO 30001114 593236 VENDOR 365070 - EXECUTIVE TITLE & ADAN HERNANDEZ D/P AHERNANDEZ5268000808 191-138785-884100-44200 52658000808 AHERNANDEZ 311717 0.00 188.38 0.00 188.38 CHECK NO 30001115 593237 VENDOR 365240 - EXECUTIVE TITLE & FROYLAN RESENDIZ D/P FRESENDIZ5268000743 191-138785-884100-44200 52658000743 D/PFRESENDIZ 311737 0.00 18.34- 0.00 CHECK NO 430060 593283 VENDOR 900050 - F.C. PROPERTIES, INC. REF,FC PROPERTIES 364884 113-000000-115420-00000 REF.FC PROPERTIES 950 ENCORE WAY 18.34- CHECK NO 30000783 30000775 30000852 30000782 593026 VENDOR 214900 - F.P.L. 32426-54246 9/3-10/2/02 32426-54246 9/3-10/2/02 08799-45103 9/12-10/11/02 08799-45103 9/12-10/11/02 30204-30389 9/3-10/2/02 30204-30389 9/3-10/2/02 32536-07331 9/3-10/2/02 32536-07331 9/3-10/2/02 408-233351-643100-00000 111-156332-643100-00000 001-156363-643100-00000 408-233351-643100-00000 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 916.61 0.00 916.61 0.00 3.77- 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3.77- 1,082.88 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 11,546.39 0.00 25,011.82 3,093.67 0.00 2,510.54 0.00 14,432.60 0.00 11,546.39 28,105.49 2,510.54 14,432.60 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001059 DESCRIPTION 02776-08089 9/16-10/15/02 02776-08089 9/16-10/15/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-106010-643100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000587 593241 VENDOR 365350 - FACON ASSOCIATES, INC. 8633 EMPL.RELATIONS MGR 001-121810-648160-00000 250853 JOB BULLETIN 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 30,703.28 O. O0 CHECK NO 30001105 593264 VENDOR 365930 - FAMA REG 11/13-15/02 TWEEDIE 251152 TWEEDIE 11/13-15/02 495-192310-654360-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30000871 593199 VENDOR 349760 - FAPPO REGIST 10/25-28 L.WOOD 250959 REGIST 10/25-28 L.WOOD C/O WALTER PRYOR 001-121710-654360-00000 PAGE 56 CHECK NO 592895 VENDOR 30000581 5-087-13246 250966 SHIPPING 30000593 4-395-54709 311626 SHIPPING 30001018 4-399-52479 310424 SHIPPING 30001161 4-395-54983 310935 SHIPPING 30000777 4-399-52214 206615 SHIPPING 30000592 4-379-58318 311411 SHIPPING 6250 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 113-138930-641950-00000 118-144211-641950-34300 101-163612-641950-00000 681-421510-641950-00000 121-138755-641950-34500 001-121810-641950-00000 VCHR NET 30,703.28 87,298.30 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 90.00 CHECK NO 592996 VENDOR 172870 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 250.00 0.00 26.98 0.00 26.98 0.00 8.50 0.00 0.00 8.50 0.00 8.50 8.50 0.00 33.50 0.00 33.50 0.00 17.35 0.00 17.35 0.00 5.90 0,00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.90 100.73 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001163 30000583 30000776 30000582 30001162 DESCRIPTION 4-422-40496 310376 SHIPPING 4-413-22242 310013 SHIPPING 4-401-49302 311668 SHIPPING 4-418-80838 310897 SHIPPING 4-419-21089 310897 SHIPPING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 114-178975-641950-00000 0.00 111-138317-641950-00000 0.00 470-173410-641950-00000 0.00 001-000000-142900-00000 0.00 001-000000-142900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000853 30000853 592931 VENDOR 110620 - FERGUSON ENTERPRISES 855404 408-233351-655100-00000 310409 PARTS 855580 408-233351-655100-00000 310409 PARTS 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 5.25 0.00 9.05 0.00 CHECK NO 30000872 593152 VENDOR 327520 - FGFOA REGIST 11/17-22 S.USHER 250033 REGIST 11/17-22 S. USHER 001-101520-654360-00000 5.90 0.00 CHECK NO 30000580 593250 VENDOR 365600 - FINGER LAKES BOOK COMPANY 8367 307-156111-766100-54001 250946 KIDS REF.MAT. PAGE CHECK NO 430061 593307 VENDOR 900140 - FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA FIRST NAT.BANK 021842CFA 681-421190-634401-00000 FIRST NAT.BANK 02-1842-CFA N.BERLAND VCHR NET 5.25 CHECK NO 593136 VENDOR 318400 - FIRST UNION FINANCIAL 9.05 5.90 44.95 0.00 44.95 10.80 0.00 10.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.95 0.00 12.60 0.00 12.60 2,900.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.900. O0 2.912.60 0.00 230.00 0.00 230.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 230.00 0.00 150,00 0.00 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 7.50 7.50 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001056 PP#2 PP#2 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AJ4T DISC 001-000000-216210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001062 593092 VENDOR 288620 - FLA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY 21-02-3236-1-1 9/13-10/9 408-210105-643400-00000 21-02-3236-1-1 9/13-10/9 0.00 CHECK NO 30001034 592969 PP #2 PP#2 VENDOR 158730 - FLORIDA DEPT OF EDUCATION 001-000000-218900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000590 30000590 593207 878006PI 310051 PARTS 877444PI 310051 PARTS VENDOR 352360 - FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001017 593190 VENDOR 346120 - FLORIDA ENGINEERING SOCIETY COMM.CARTER 11/15/02 001-100010-640312-00000 251201 SW FL b~ATER RES.CONF. 0.00 CHECK NO 30001063 30000602 30000602 30001063 592899 84137-38272 9/4-10/3/02 84137-38272 9/4-10/3/02 84580-86579 9/3-10/2/02 84580-86579 9/3-10/2/02 93380-95574 9/3-10/02/02 93380-95574 9/3-10/2/02 47877-28106 9/9-10/8/02 47877-28106 9/9-10/8/02 VENDOR 6790 - FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 001-156110-643100-00000 408-233351-643100-00000 408-233351-643100-00000 113-138900-643100-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AM1- NET 387.80 CHECK TOTAL 190.07 CHECK TOTAL 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 61.72 40.73 CHECK TOTAL 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 5,195.85 8.75 9.85 16.75 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 387.80 387.80 190.07 190.07 25.00 25.00 61.72 40.73 102.45 50.00 50.00 5.195.85 58 8.75 9.85 16.75 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000602 30000602 30001063 30001063 30000602 30000602 30001063 30000602 30001063 30001063 30001063 30000602 30001063 30000602 30000602 30001063 30001063 DESCRIPTION 97229-32085 8/22-9/23/02 97229-32085 8/22-9/23/02 41285-39279 9/9-10/8/02 41285-39279 9/9-10/8/02 69488-10285 9/9-10/8/02 69488-10285 9/9-10/8/02 94977-51314 9/9-10/8/02 94977-51314 9/9-10/8/02 02968-36240 9/9-10/8/02 02968-36240 9/9-10/8/02 81704-51135 9/10-10/9/02 81704-51135 9/10-10/9/02 57154-73574 9/11-10/10/02 57154-73574 9/11-10/10/02 29113-35137 9/5-10/4/02 29113-35137 9/5-10/4/02 20572-11571 9/12-10/11/02 20572-11571 9/12-10/11/02 81290-37431 9/12-10/11/02 81290-37431 9/12-10/11/02 13749-79324 9/9-10/8/02 13749-79324 9/9-10/8/02 02368-36284 9/9-10/8/02 02368-36284 9/9-10/8/02 39984-36509 9/13-10/14/02 39984-36509 9/13-10/14/02 46281-90284 9/9-10/8/02 46281-90284 9/9-10/8/02 67285-11574 9/9-10/8/02 67285-11574 9/9-10/8/02 43730-78221 9/9-10/8/02 43730-78221 9/9-10/8/02 74015-71141 9/12-10/11/02 74015-71141 9/12-10/11/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-157110-643100-00000 0.00 470-173441-643100-00000 0.00 408-210151-643100-00000 0.00 101-163612-643100-00000 0.00 470-173435-643100-00000 0.00 408-253221-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-253212-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 111-178980-643100-00000 0.00 470-173435-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-210151-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 101-163610-643100-00000 0.00 408-233312-643100-00000 0.00 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 8.46 0.00 PAGE 59 VCHR NET 8.46 140.98 0.00 140.98 546.51 0.00 546.51 368.36 0.00 368.36 8.68 0.00 2,187.96 0.00 8.68 2,187.96 19.70 0.00 19.70 598.85 0.00 598.85 15.00 0.00 15.00 31.23 0.00 31.23 166.84 0.00 166.84 73.32 0.00 73.32 11.61 0.00 11.61 542.31 0.00 542.31 9.49 0.00 9.49 12.93 0.00 12.93 434.30 0.00 434.30 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30000602 78113-41267 9/9-10/8/02 78113-41267 9/9-10/8/02 30001063 73547-83560 9/12-10/11/02 73547-83560 9/12-10/11/02 30001193 56244-74077 8/30-10/1/02 56244-74077 8/30-10/1/02 30001063 65407-23027 9/12-10/11/02 65407-23027 9/12-10/11/02 30001063 82797-60329 9/9-10/8/02 82797-60329 9/9-10/8/02 30001192 01458-36201 9/9-10/8/02 01458-36201 9/9-10/8/02 30000602 46304-11595 9/3-10/2/02 46304-11595 9/3-10/2/02 30001063 61474-52020 9/12-10/11/02 61474-52020 9/12-10/11/02 30000602 69075-41483 8/30-10/1/02 69075-41483 8/30-10/1/02 30000602 58478-43348 9/6-10/7/02 58478-43348 9/6-10/7/02 30001063 08707-89229 9/9-10/8/02 08707-89229 9/9-10/8/02 30000602 55472-44078 9/4-10/3/02 55472-44078 9/4-10/3/02 30001063 70747-88212 9/12-10/11/02 70747-88212 9/12-10/11/02 30000602 64612-30390 9/3-10/2/02 64612-30390 9/3-10/2/02 30000602 36818-99237 9/10-10/9/02 36818-99237 9/10-10/9/02 30000602 95030-30299 9/3-10/2/02 9530-30299 9/3-10/2/02 30001063 19095-06238 9/12-10/11/02 19095-06238 9/12-10/11/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-138710-643100-00000 0.00 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 408-253221-643100-00000 0.00 001-106010-643100-00000 0.00 101-163610-643100-00000 0.00 113-138900-643100-00000 0.00 111-156332-643100-00000 0.00 001-106010-643100-00000 0.00 408-253221-643100-00000 0.00 188-140480-643100-00000 0.00 101-163610-643100-00000 0.00 001-156145-643100-00000 0.00 408-233312-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 001-121730-643100-00000 0.00 111-156332-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 319.43 0.00 8.46 0.00 51,862.99 0.00 PAGE 60 VCHR NET 319.43 8.46 51,862.99 8.95 0.00 8.95 291.85 0.00 291.85 8,303.09 0.00 1,584.49 0.00 8,303.09 1,584.49 167.90 0.00 167.90 2,527.25 0.00 2,527.25 633.60 0.00 633.60 466.27 0.00 466.27 2,637.50 0.00 2,637.50 11.61 0.00 11.61 22.64 0.00 22.64 9.04 0.00 1,277.56 0.00 9,04 1,277.56 13.81 0.00 13.81 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000602 DESCRIPTION 52477-53097 9/3-10/2/02 52477-53097 9/3-10/2/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BO~.RD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000591 592900 VENDOR 6940 - FLORIDA TREND D.BLANTON 250037 RENEW SUBSCRIPTION 001-157110-654110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001016 30001016 30001016 593044 009727285-0 8/7-10/8 009727285-0 8/7-10/8 009727305-6 9/6-10/8 009727305-6 9/6-10/8 009727295-9 9/9-10/9 009727295-9 9/9-10/9 VENDOR 243280 - FLORIDA WATER SERVICES 001-106010-643400-00000 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 8.46 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001165 1 PAGE 61 CHECK NO 30001195 VCHR NET 8.46 80,562.63 CHECK NO 30000914 30000917 30000912 29.95 0.00 29.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 29,95 0.00 28.55 0.00 28.55 470-173442-643400-00000 0.00 184.59 0.00 184.59 174.86 0.00 174.86 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 388.00 001-106010-643400-00000 0.00 593235 VENDOR 364990 - FRANKLIN COVEY 23946/19091 681-421510-651110-00000 681-421510-641950-00000 250936 BINDERS,FILLERS 0.00 176.70 0.00 11.00 0.00 0.00 592967 VENDOR 157320 - FREEMAN AND FREEMAN INC. E PHARISIEN 191-138785-884200-44200 311978 SHIP REHAB 187.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 187.70 15,000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 408-210130-652130-00000 593162 VENDOR 333980 - G&K SERVICES 836787 310559 UNIFORMS 837854 310636 UNIFORMS 836781 310310 UNIFORMS 408-233352-652130-00000 408-233312-652130-00000 0.00 328.86 0.00 328.86 0.00 102.72 0.00 102.72 0.00 132.08 0.00 132.08 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000753 829005 311511 30000760 829804 311221 30000916 832251 310260 30000753 829005 311511 30000758 832245 310998 30000753 833123 311511 30000913 837853 310361 30000754 832240 311558 CHECK NO 593175 30000759 832252 310088 30000756 828130 311409 30000757 833090 311104 30000757 828972 311104 30000757 829803 311104 30000756 832242 311409 30000755 836786 DESCRIPTION UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORM UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS VENDOR 339190 - G&K SERVICES UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156381-634999-00000 0.00 101-163628-652130-00000 0.00 408-233313-652130-00000 0.00 111-156381-652130-00000 0.00 101-163630-652130-00000 0.00 111-156381-652130-00000 0.00 408-233350-652130-00000 0.00 001-155410-652130-00000 0.00 109-182602-652130-00000 0.00 109-182901-652130-00000 0.00 109-182901-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652130-00000 0.00 101-163620-652130-00000 0,00 101-163620-652130-00000 0.00 101-163620-652130-00000 0.00 001-122240-652130-00000 0.00 109-182602-652130-00000 0.00 109-182901-652130-00000 0.00 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1.44 0.00 PAGE 62 VCHR NET 1.44 69.45 0.00 69.45 16.52 0.00 16.52 4.05 0.00 4.05 48.63 0,00 48.63 4.05 0.00 4.05 34.30 0.00 34.30 36.10 0.00 36.10 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16.20 49.34 6.35 0.00 778.20 71.89 16.20 49.34 110.42 0.00 110.42 264.56 0.00 264.56 85.43 0.00 85.43 79.53 0.00 79.53 109.61 0.00 109.61 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 310088 UNIFORMS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182901-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 592902 VENDOR 30000722 11781610 311391 BOOKS 30000722 11810773 311391 BOOKS 30000921 11884403 311391 LARGE PRINT TITLES 30000722 11810774 311391 BOOKS 30000722 11785080 311391 BOOKS 30001167 141416 311605 RENEWAL 30000722 11813978 311391 BOOKS 30000722 11818220 311391 BOOKS 30000746 11825489 311391 BOOKS 30000911 11875598 250938 SUPPLIES 30000921 11874476 311391 LARGE PRINT TITLES 30000722 11807284 311391 BOOKS 30000722 11782092 311391 BOOKS 7400 - GALE RESEARCH COMPANY 355-156190-766100-54260 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 6,10 O. O0 1 PAGE 63 VCHR NET 71.64 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 793.08 0.00 130.29 0.00 130.29 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-654380-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 CHECK NO 593308 VENDOR 900140 - GARY A. RALPH ESQ. 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 307-156111-766100-54001 0.00 160.97 0.00 160.97 413.34 0.00 413.34 482.98 0.00 482.98 271.81 0.00 271.81 27,287.00 0.00 27,287.00 44.17 0.00 44.17 274.06 0.00 274.06 223.15 0.00 223.15 230.64 0.00 230.64 130.29 0,00 130,29 413.34 0.00 413.34 179.58 0.00 179.58 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30,241.62 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 430055 DESCRIPTION SFL~RP CHILDRENO2-259CJA SFL~RP CHILDREN 02-259 CJA COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-421190-631020-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430051 593284 VENDOR 900050 - GARY D. WALDROP INC. REF 365253 G. WALDROP 113-000000-115420-00000 REF 365253 G. WALDROP CHECK NO 30000939 593063 VENDOR 260540 - GATES MCVEY CAPITAL GROUP,L.L.C. REF 365742 GATES MCVEY 113-000000-115420-00000 REF 365742 GATES MCVEY AMT NET VCHR DISC 85.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30000747 593228 VENDOR 362410 - GEORGE W. PARK SEED COMPANY, INC. 2160870-1 001-157110-646320-00000 001-157110-641950-00000 250797 SUPPLIES PAGE 64 CHECK NO 30000881 593245 VENDOR 365450 - GEORGINA MAUSEN REIMB,10/11/02 LUNCH.MILE 516-121650-649990-00000 516-121650-640200-00000 250937 REIMB. 10/11/02 LUNCH, MILEAG VCHR NET 85.00 CHECK NO 30000919 30000751 30000919 30000750 30000750 592903 VENDOR 76679 311114 SUPPLIES 76241 311114 SUPPLIES 76691 311114 SUPPLIES 76673 310439 SUPPLIES 76667 310439 SUPPLIES 7770 - GOLDEN GATE NURSERY 111-163645-646314-00000 111-163645-646314-00000 111-163645-646314-00000 408-233351-646314-00000 408-233351-646314-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 85.00 0.00 10.60 O.O0 10.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10,60 0.00 19.55 0.00 19.55 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.80 0.00 3,95 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.00 0.00 7.54 0.00 19.55 25.75 25.75 22.54 0.00 34.00 0.00 34.00 0.00 34.00 0.00 34.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 22.50 0.00 22.50 0.00 190.00 0.00 190.00 CHECK TOTAL 0,00 22.54 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000919 DESCRIPTION 76685 311114 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-163645-646314-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000761 30000714 30000714 30000714 30000714 30000714 593000 VENDOR 178630 - GRAINGER 287-320660-7 310638 SUPPLIES 834-191124-9 311406 SUPPLIES 931-217258-9 311406 SUPPLIES 480-874824-0 311406 SUPPLIES 287-111486-0 311406 SUPPLIES 931-874823-4 311406 SUPPLIES 408-233352-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000724 30000724 30000724 30000724 30000920 30000724 30000752 592905 VENDOR 0630265980 311408 SUPPLIES 0630268262 311408 SUPPLIES 0630265395 311408 SUPPLIES 0630267840 311408 SUPPLIES 0620891759 310548 SUPPLIES 0630260241 311408 SUPPLIES 0630267950 310447 SUPPLIES 7900 - GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 001-122240-652991-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 190.00 0.00 PAGE 65 VCHR NET 190.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 565.50 32.22 0.00 32.22 457.30 0.00 457.30 559.98 0.00 559.98 308.23 0.00 308.23 226.72 0.00 226.72 4,721.68 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,721.68 6,306.13 408-233351-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 21.30 0.00 21.30 596.52 0.00 596.52 12.60 0.00 12.60 320.78 0.00 320.78 158.34 0.00 158.34 642.60 0.00 642.60 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-122240-652993-00000 0.00 001-122240-652993-00000 0.00 0.00 13.73 0.00 13.73 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000724 30000724 30000920 30000724 30000920 30000724 30000724 30000724 30000724 30000724 DESCRIPTION 0630260446 311408 SUPPLIES 0630268034 311408 SUPPLIES 0620890625 310548 SUPPLIES 0630265397 311408 SUPPLIES 0620891914 310548 SUPPLIES 0630267574 311408 SUPPLIES 0630264882 311408 SUPPLIES 0630268151 311408 SUPPLIES 0630266770 311408 SUPPLIES 0630268181 311408 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652993-00000 0.00 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-122240-652993-00000 0.00 001-122240-652993-00000 0.00 001-122240-652993-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000749 593041 VENDOR 239140 - GREAT AMERICA LEASING CORPORATION 2687601 111-156310-644620-00000 310208 LEASE FOR COPIER CHECK NO 30000925 30000748 592928 VENDOR 106780 - GREGORY COURT REPORTING A. DEJESUS 01-2764 681-410310-634406-00000 A. DEJESUS 01-2764 960645 001-155410-634999-00000 250773 REPORTING PANEL AMT NET VCHR DISC 81.15 0.00 I I PAGE 66 CHECK NO 592979 VENDOR 163780 - GREGORY MANGONE VCHR NET 81.15 55.34 0.00 55.34 51.84 0.00 51.84 108.00 0.00 108.00 32.76- 0.00 32.76- 22.00 0.00 22.00 196.48 0.00 196.48 245.60 0.00 245.60 257.25 0.00 257.25 158.34 0.00 158.34 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,909.11 0.00 393.97 0.00 393.97 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 393.97 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 97.50 0.00 97.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 127.50 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000909 30000910 30000909 30000909 30000910 DESCRIPTION J. TRUGLIO 01-2891 J. TRUGLIO 01-2891 B. TAYLOR 01-515 B. TAYLOR 01-515 MERISTIL 01-3106 MERISTIL 01-3106 D. BAILEY 02-977 D. BAILEY 02-977 M. DAVIS 02-1554 M. DAVIS 02-1554 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-421190-631020-00000 0.00 681-421190-631020-00000 0.00 681-421190-631020-00000 0.00 681-421190-631020-00000 0.00 681-421190-631020-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000723 30000723 593021 VENDOR 203270 - GROLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY 10739592 307-156111-766100-54001 311598 BOOKS 10741044 307-156111-766100-54001 311598 BOOKS 0.00 CHECK NO 30000745 593110 VENDOR 299230 - GUARDIAN PERSONAL STORAGE D-2-153 111-156425-644170-00000 310740 STORAGE AMT NET VCHR DISC 900.00 0.00 CHECK NO 430052 593267 VENDOR 900010 - GULFCOAST TITLE OVRPYMT 1003-918817 111-000000-122500-00000 OVRPYMT 1003-918817 1 CHECK NO 30001127 593254 VENDOR 365650 - GULFSANDS CONTRACTING, INC. TOLLEY 10/16/02 191-138785-884200-33752 40743640004 BTOLLEY 311976 PAGE CHECK NO 593154 VENDOR 329170 - HANSEN ELECTRICAL SUPPLY VCHR NET 900.00 900.00 0.00 900.00 900.00 0.00 900.00 900.00 0.00 900.00 go0.o0 0.00 900.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,060.80 0.00 4,500.00 1,060.80 0.00 421.40 0.00 421.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.482.20 0.00 58.00 0.00 58.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 58.00 0.00 76.27 0.00 76.27 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 76.27 0.00 2,200.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 67 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000744 DESCRIPTION 1034288 250606 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001047 593150 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 323370 - HARRIS COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 001-000000-218810-00000 CHECK NO 30001185 593240 VENDOR 365340 - HAZEL GRIFFIN CLOSING PAR 144 311830 CLOSING PAR 144 331-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 30000928 #10 603943 TO 8/02 30000928 #44 603943 8/1-31/02 592927 VENDOR 106690 - HAZEN & SAWYER, ENGINEERS 413-263611-763100-73077 AMT NET VCHR DISC 570.21 0.00 CHECK NO 30000918 PAGE VCHR NET 570.21 CHECK NO 30000924 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 570.21 0.00 179.08 0.00 179.08 CHECK NO 30000922 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 179.08 413-263613-631400-73031 0.00 593201 VENDOR 350490 - HERMAN MILLER WORKPLACE RESOURCE 07544 101-163621-651910-00000 250969 FILE CABINET 26,311.41 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17,925.15 0.00 7,418.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 26,311.41 26,311.41 17,925.15 7,418.00 25,343.15 593001 VENDOR 178790 - HIDEAWAY STORAGE 543/160 470-173463-644170-00000 311689 STORAGE 593057 VENDOR 257530 - HIGH TECH SWEEPING. INC PAVEMENT SWEEP 10/8,10/13 495-192370-634999-00000 250792 SWEEPING 10/8-10/13 0.00 364.59 0.00 364.59 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 364.59 0.00 95.00 0.00 95.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 95.00 0.00 530.00 0.00 530.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 530.00 68 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 593179 VENDOR 342220 - HOLLISTER INC. 30000742 90909652 311347 ANIMAL COLLAR 001-155410-652990-00000 1 AMI NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 593285 VENDOR 900050 - HOLLY STUTTS 430053 REF PARKS H. STUTTS REF PARKS H. STUTTS 430054 REF PARKS H, STU1-FS REF PARKS H. STUI-rS 111-156390-347290-00000 111-156390-347290-00000 PAGE 69 VCHR NET CHECK NO 593249 30001046 PP #2 PP#2 VENDOR 365580 - HOLLY WINCHESTER 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 545,25 0.00 545.25 CHECK NO 30000743 30000743 30000743 30000743 30000743 30000743 30000743 30000743 592982 VENDOR 164250 - HOME DEPOT 000393/9030520 311403 SUPPLIES 000422/2010828 311403 SUPPLIES 000323/7141433 311403 SUPPLIES 000399/1111404 311403 SUPPLIES 000719/6030745 311403 SUPPLIES 000408/1091624 311403 SUPPLIES 000501/5010651 311403 SUPPLIES 000419/8080522 311403 SUPPLIES 001-122240-652989-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 001-122240-652989-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652989-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 545.25 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 46.00 0.00 98.00 0.00 98.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 98.00 0.00 34.64 0.00 34.64 0.00 123.62 0.00 123.62 0.00 26.40 0.00 26.40 0.00 342.68 0.00 342.68 0.00 16.84 0.00 16.84 0.00 43.86 0.00 43.86 0.00 41.86 0.00 41.86 0,00 19.85 0.00 19.85 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000743 30000743 DESCRIPTION 000395/2021375 311403 SUPPLIES 000467/1031227 311403 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652989-00000 0.00 001-122240-652989-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000770 593209 VENDOR 352900 - HOME DEPOT 6191671 00075440006 SESTRAJ)A 251133 191-138785-884200-33752 0.00 CHECK NO 30000923 593170 VENDOR 337670 - HOOVER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT,INC EXPERT WITNESS 313-163673-761100-60111 105912 PROF SERVICES 9/27 CHECK NO 30001033 592950 PP ~¢2 PP#2 VENDOR 134560 - ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 001-000000-217001-00000 ANT NET VCHR DISC 23.82 0.00 CHECK NO 30000741 593072 VENDOR 270140 - IFAS PUBLICATIONS #54 001-157110-652990-00000 001-157110-641950-00000 250924 SUPPLIES PAGE 70 CHECK NO 30000908 593123 VENDOR 310350 - IMAGE ONE 41530 205777 SCANNED IMAGES 301-210140-764900-50014 VCHR NET 23.82 CHECK NO 30001196 593178 VENDOR 341540 - IMMOKALEE AIR & APPLIANCE COMPANY 1006 191-138785-884200-33752 311937 SHIP RES.REHAB.ORTIZ 85.02 0.00 85.02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 758.59 35.00 0.00 35.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 35.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 190.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 190.00 0.00 30,052.75 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 30,052.75 30,052.75 130.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 130.00 2,076.86 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 2,076.86 2,076.86 15,000.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15,000.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AliT DISC CHECK NO 592951 VENDOR 134950 - IMMOKALEE DISPOSAL COMPANY 30001183 10/02 FRANCHISE FEES 311541 10/02 FRANCHISE FEES 473-173412-313720-00000 0.00 30001183 10/02 COLLECTIONS 311541 10/02 COLLECTIONS 473-173411-634800-00000 473-173412-634800-00000 161 1 CHECK NO 30001116 593243 VENDOR 365390 - INDEPENDENT TITLE & JOSHUA SNYDER D/P JSNYDER 38720320003 191-138785-884100-44200 38720320003 D/P JSNYDER 311975 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30000915 593248 VENDOR 365570 - INDIANA UNIVERSITY PRESS 291234 307-156111-766100-54001 250931 FLORIDAS FRONTIER 911.08- 0.00 CHECK NO 30000944 593107 VENDOR 296020 - INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS 2057749 9/13 001-000000-202800-00000 2057749 9/13 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,510.79 0.00 CHECK NO 592949 30001035 PP#2 PP#2 30001036 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 134360 - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 001-000000-218900-00000 001-000000-218900-00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 593038 30001037 PP ~2 PP ~P2 VENDOR 234030 - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 001-000000-218900-00000 2,500.00 0.00 CHECK NO 593033 VENDOR 228570 - INTERNATIONAL RIGHT OF WAY ASSOC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 71 VCHR NET 911.08- 29,510.79 28,599.71 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 64.50 0,00 64.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 64.50 0.00 10.55 0.00 10.55 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.55 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 175.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 175.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001104 DESCRIPTION REG 10/28 J BRACK 250506 J BRACK 10/28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AM1- DISC 312-163615-654360-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000733 593128 VENDOR 313840 - IOSCAPITAL 56464236 311245 SUPPLIES 681-410710-644620-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000982 30000982 30000982 30000982 593037 VENDOR 231810 - J. M. TODD COMPANY 85637 250715 MAINTENANCE 85638 250715 MAINTENANCE 85639 250715 MAINTENANCE 85635 250715 MAINTENANCE 101-163620-634999-00000 0.00 101-163620-634999-00000 0.00 101-163620-634999-00000 0.00 101-163620-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000977 30000977 30000977 30000977 593168 8212388 SUTURE SCISSORS 8212388 CREDIT 8212388 POLY CATHETERS 8212388 THORACIC PLAST SET VENDOR 336570 - J.A. WEBSTER, INC. 001-155410-652720-00000 ~J~T NET VCHR DISC 245.00 0.00 PAGE 72 VCHR NET 245.00 CHECK NO 30000989 30001000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 245.00 716.08 0.00 716.08 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 716.08 100.00 0.00 100.00 350.00 0.00 350.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 350.00 0.00 350.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 900.00 0.00 4.60 0.00 001-155410-652720-00000 0.00 001-155410-652720-00000 0.00 001-155410-652720-00000 0.00 0.81- 0.00 4.60 0.81- 12.69 0.00 12.69 63.34 0.00 63.34 0.00 593036 VENDOR 231020 - J.M. TODD COMPANY 85417 146-144380-646710-00000 250741 TONERS 85115 101-163620-764360-00000 311071 9/28 10/27 CHECK TOTAL 79.82 0.00 241.00 0.00 241.00 0.00 92.25 0.00 92.25 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30000447 593156 VENDOR 329950 - JAMES COLETTA 9/25 BREAKFAST J. COLETTA 9/25 KICKOFF BREAKFAST J.COLETTA 001-010110-640200-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001173 30001171 30001172 593208 VENDOR 352800 - JAMES DELONY 8/28-29 P/D TRVL J.DELONY 8/28-29 P/D TRVL J,DELONY 9/25-27 P/D J. DELONY 9/25-27 P/D J.DELONY 10/02 TRVL J. DELONY 10/02 TRVL J.DELONY 408-210105-654360-00000 0,00 408-210105-640300-00000 0.00 408-210105-654360-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430080 593309 VENDOR 900140 - JAMES SIMKINS 01-1812 SIMKINS 01-1812 SIMKINS VS R KUHNS 681-421190-634405-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430079 593310 VENDOR 900140 - JANE MCGUIGAN 00-00121CF MRS MCGUIGAN MCGUIGAN VS R KIPP 681-421190-634405-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430087 593270 VENDOR 900030 - JANEEN D. PERSON-COALE 10/6-8/02 TRVL J.PERSON 121-138755-640300-34500 10/6-8/02 TRVL P/D J. PERSON-COALE 161 1 CHECK NO 30001103 593256 VENDOR 365710 - JAY SEIDL REIMB TRAVEL 9/18-21/02 250960 TRAVEL 9/18-21/02 111-100130-640300-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 333.25 20.00 0.00 20.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.00 21.00 0.00 21.00 36.00 0.00 36.00 1.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.00 58.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 245.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 138.00 138.00 0.00 138.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 84.00 84.00 0.00 84.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30000979 30000979 30000979 30000979 592994 14855 250071 LOCK FOR RESTROOM 14771 250071 REPLACE 14929 250071 LATCH SET 14866 250071 WALL STOP COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 169770 - JENNINGS ARCHITECTURAL HARDWARE 001-122240-652987-00000 001-122240-652987-00000 001-122240-652987-00000 001-122240-652987-00000 AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC PAGE VCHR NET CHECK NO 430047 593286 VENDOR 900050 - JESSICA C ASSAM REFUND PARKS 111-156390-347911-00000 REFUND 0.00 30.15 0.00 30.15 CHECK NO 430091 430092 593287 VENDOR 900050 - JESSICA C. ASSAM REF PARKS J. ASSAM 111-156390-347911-00000 REF PARKS J. ASSAM REF PARKS J. ASSAM 111-000000-208901-00000 REF PARKS J. ASSAM 0.00 141.75 0.00 141.75 0.00 35.00 0,00 35.00 CHECK NO 30001001 593098 VENDOR 292620 - JM TODD, INC. 85601 311352 10/4 11/3/02 517-121640-634999-00000 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 CHECK NO 430078 593311 VENDOR 900140 - JOHN MCGUIGAN 00-001216CF J MCGUIGAN 00-001216CF MCGUIGAN VS R KIPP 681-421190-634405-00000 CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 430088 593271 VENDOR 900030 - JOHN VANMETER 10/8 TRVL 3.VANMETER 10/8/02 TRVL J.VANMETER 001-157110-640200-00000 0.00 278.90 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 80.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 4.80 0.00 4.80 0.00 42.92 0.00 42.92 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 138.00 0.00 138.00 0.00 138.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 273.00 0.00 273.00 0.00 273.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 84.80 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC ANT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 42.92 75 CHECK NO 30001008 592946 VENDOR 133420 - JOHNSON ENGINEERING INC. #44 801731 TO 9/1/02 334-163650-631400-60134 411-273511-631400-70028 413-263611-631400-73028 413-263611-631400-74028 313-163673-631400-60134 412-273511-631400-70028 331-163650-631400-60134 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,640.00 0.00 1,650.00 1,650.00 0.00 1,650.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 14,590.00 14,590.00 CHECK NO 30OOO87O 593244 VENDOR 365440 - JOLE HOLLOCHER REIMB 10/11/02 LUNCH 516-121650-649990-00000 250941 REIMB 10/11/02 LUNCH 0.00 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 15.00 15,00 CHECK NO 30000890 592893 VENDOR 6070 - JUDGE EUGENE TURNER 10/7-9/02 TRVL E. TURNER 001-432020-640300-00000 10/7-9/02 TRVL E.TURNER 0.00 105.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 105.80 105.80 CHECK NO 30001164 593071 VENDOR 267290 - JUDI BODINE PETTY CASH PE1-FY CASH 001-100190-640250-00000 0.00 37.33 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 37.33 37.33 CHECK NO 430043 593288 VENDOR 900050 - JULIE SALLERFIELD PARRI BOOK REFUND J PARRI 001-156110-347110-00000 REFUND J PARRI 0.00 14.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 14.50 14.50 CHECK NO 593239 VENDOR 365330 - JULIO AND LORI PEREZ 30001184 CLOSING PARCEL 154 331-163650-761100-60018 311832 CLOSING PAR 154 0.00 5,289.73 0.00 5,289.73 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,289.73 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001177 DESCRIPTION 593076 VENDOR 275140 - KADY ARNOLD REIMB 9/18-21/02 K.ARNOLD 250952 REIMB 9/18-21/02 K. ARNOLD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-100130-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001007 593172 VENDOR 338030 - KCCS, INC. #12 106605 8/12-9/8/02 313-163673-631400-60071 0.00 331-163650-631400-60071 0,00 CHECK NO 30000980 593025 VENDOR 213820 - KEEP AMERICAN BEAUTIFUL, INC. C03411-628115 111-156349-652990-00000 250123 TRICK OR TREAT BAGS CHECK NO 30000991 593163 VENDOR 334110 - KEVIN SMITTER REIMBERS. CLASS C SMITTER 250226 SMITTER K 9/30 408-233312-649010-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30001100 593234 VENDOR 364960 - KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER 632760194-001 001-122240-654370-00000 250400 SIMPSON,CALLIS,RODRIGUEZ CHECK NO 30000990 593259 VENDOR 365820 - KRISTOPHER FUZI FUZI 9/30 REIMB.CLASS A E 408-233312-649010-00000 250227 FUZI REIMBERS, PAGE CHECK NO 430044 593289 VENDOR 900050 - LA PRINCIPAL REF 355763 LA PRINNCIPAL REF LA PRINCIPAL 14950 OLD 41 113-138900-321110-00000 VCHR NET 410.90 0.00 410.90 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 410.90 0.00 43,197.98 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 43,197.98 43,197.98 0.00 125.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 200.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 507.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 200.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 125.00 0.00 507.00 0.00 507.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 469.25 0.00 469.25 0.00 469.25 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 592906 VENDOR 11050 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 30000968 1002212806 250607 SUPPLIES 001-122240-652720-00000 161 CHECK NO 593020 VENDOR 201990 30000996 2002147 206788 SUPPLIES LANGHAM CONSULTING SERVICES 301-121125-634999-50017 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30000867 593133 VENDOR 317010 LAUREN BEARD 10/17 MBA LUNCH L. BESuRD 10/17 MBA LUNCH L. BEARD 191-138785-654360-44200 1 CHECK NO 430081 593272 VENDOR 900030 9/24/02 TRVL L.NETT 9/24/02 TRVL L. NE1-F LAVONNE NETT 001-156130-640200-00000 PAGE CHECK NO 593224 30001031 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 361110 LAW OFFICE OF ERSKINE AND FLEISHER 001-000000-218900-00000 VCHR NET CHECK NO 593251 VENDOR 365620 LAWYERS TITLE & FRUMENCIO LORA 30001118 D/P FLOP, A 48600000747 191-138785-884100-44200 48600000747 D/P FLOP, A 311973 0.00 20.28 0,00 20.28 CHECK NO 30001117 593252 VENDOR 365630 LAWYERS TITLE & JOSE GONZALEZ D/P JGONZALEZ 48600001526 191-138785-884100-44200 48600001526 D/P JGONZALEZ 311972 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.28 CHECK NO 593253 VENDOR 365640 LAWYERS TITLE & SAMUEL RIVEEA 0.00 3,831.75 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,831.75 3,831.75 0.00 15.00 0.00 15,00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9.57 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.00 9.57 9.57 O.O0 286.75 0.00 286.75 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 286.75 5.000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 3000119 DESCRIPTION D/P SRIVERA 00446960005 00446960005 D/P SRIVERA 311974 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 191-138785-884100-44200 0.00 CHECK NO 30000993 30000993 30000993 30000993 592907 20195-145917 9/3 10/03 20195-145917 9/3 10/03 20195-101180 9/11 10/10 20195-101180 9/11 10/10 20195-101440 9/11 10/10 20195-101440 9/11 10/10 20195-101183 9/11 10/10 20195-101183 9/11 10/10 VENDOR 11110 - LEE CO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 001-155410-643100-00000 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 5.000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 CHECK NO 30001179 593216 VENDOR 358790 - LEE COMBS 10/6-10 TRVL L.COMBS 10/6-10 TRVL L. COMBS PAGE CHECK NO 430048 VCHR NET 5.000.00 5,000.00 CHECK NO 30000646 30000997 30001191 30000963 30000995 0.00 24.95 0.00 24.95 001-156150-643100-00000 0.00 198-157440-643100-00000 0.00 001-156150-643100-00000 0.00 121-138755-640300-34500 0.00 593290 VENDOR 900050 - LENNAR FAMILY OF BUILDERS 363752 LENNAR FAMILY 113-000000-115420-00000 LENNAR FAMILY 363752 2.502.54 0.00 2,502.54 47.17 0.00 47.17 2,502.54 0.00 CHECK TOTAL O.O0 593095 VENDOR 290080 - LENNAR HOMES, INC 364022 LENNAR FAMILY BUIL 364022 LANNAR FAMILY OF BUILDERS 365223 LENNAR FAMILY 365223 LENNAR FAMILY 363144 LENNAR FAMILY OF BUILDERS 365691 LENNAR FAMILY LENNAR FAMILY 365691 365041 LENNER FAMILY 365041 LENNAR FAMILY OF BUILDERS 113-000000-116420-00000 113-000000-115420-00000 2.502.54 5.077.20 41.80 0.00 41.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 41.80 0.00 27.79 0.00 27.79 113-000000-115420-00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 113-000000-115420-00000 27.79 113-000000-115420-00000 0.00 77.79 0.00 77.79 0.00 8.33 0.00 8.33 0.00 89.40 0.00 89.40 0.00 23.33 0.00 23.33 0.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 430093 593291 VENDOR 900050 - LENNAR/ US HOMES REFUND 363469 LENNAR 113-000000-115420-00000 REFUND LENNAR 3800 SWAGRASS WAY CHECK NO 30001166 30000983 592908 9216 311155 FLORATAM SOD 9244 250341 SOD FOR FDOT SITE VENDOR 11240 - LEO'S SOD & LANDSCAPING 322-183825-646320-51125 101-163624-634999-00000 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 30000988 593197 VENDOR 348020 - LERNER GROUP L477152 250827 NON FICTION TITLES 307-156111-766100-54001 CHECK NO 30000972 30000639 30000639 30000972 30000639 30000972 30000639 593182 VENDOR 343480 - LILIANA CARRENDER 10-11-02 9-7 LILIANA 9-7 4 HOURS 681-421190-634402-00000 10-02-02 8:30 2:00 CARRENDER 10-02-02 681-421190-634402-00000 10-04-02 8:30 3:00 CARRENDER 10-04-02 681-421190-634402-00000 10-14-02 8:30 12:30 CARRENDER 4 HOURS 681-421190-634402-00000 10-07-02 8:30-2:00 CARRENDER 10-07-02 681-421190-634402-00000 10-10-02 8- 11:30 CARRENDER 8- 11:30 681-431590-634402-00000 10-03-02 8-12:30 4.5 HOUR CARRENDER 10-03-02 681-431590-634402-00000 PAGE VCHR NET 230.85 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 35.00 5.151.60 0.00 5,151.60 0.00 119.70 0.00 119.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.271.30 0.00 221.65 0.00 221.65 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 221.65 0.00 64.00 0.00 64.00 0.00 88.00 0.00 88.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 64.00 0.00 64.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 504.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 430045 DESCRIPTION 593292 VENDOR 900050 - LINA GWNN BOOK REFUND L GWYN LINA GWYNN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156110-347110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001102 30000891 593009 VENDOR 193100 - LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES 1535726-1 FUENTES/PIERCE 250040 FUENTES/PIERCE 001-122240-654370-00000 1537130-1 11/14/02 250397 VALINSKY,JOKELA,CALLIS 001-122240-654370-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30001038 592981 PP~¢2 PP #2 VENDOR 164110 - LOYAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO 001-000000-218400-00000 1 CHECK NO 30000955 30000955 30000955 30000955 30000955 30000955 30000955 30000955 592966 VENDOR 156570 - M. D. MOODY & SONS FC85421 311153 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 FC85189 311153 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 FC84938 311153 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 FC85330 311153 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 FC84607 311153 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 FC83591 311153 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 FC84000 311153 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 FC85025 311153 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 PAGE VCHR NET 36.95 0.00 36.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 36.95 0.00 558.00 0.00 558.00 0.00 867.00 0.00 867.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,425.00 0.00 208.09 0.00 208.09 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 208.09 0.00 21.99 0.00 21.99 0.00 291.26 0.00 291.26 0.00 84.15 0.00 84.15 0.00 87.05 0.00 87.05 0.00 268.30- 0.00 268.30- 0.00 64.39 0.00 64.39 0.00 249.94 0.00 249.94 0.00 18.36 0.00 18.36 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000955 30000955 30000955 FC85586 311153 PARTS FC85577 311153 PARTS FC85089 311153 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000526 592957 VENDOR 141870 - M. JEAN RAWSON 294676 PdkWSON- MONTEZ 681-421190-631020-00000 RAWSON MONTEZ 161 CHECK NO 30000970 593111 VENDOR 299770 - MACBETH VIDEO 12100 FL VS A DEJESUS 12100 01-2764 681-410310-634406-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 9.89 0.00 CHECK NO 30000984 593081 VENDOR 280100 - MAIL STATION COURIER 20005 113-138320-641950-00000 250843 COURIER SERVICES 84.15- 0,00 CHECK NO 30000992 30000986 30001003 30000998 30001003 30000985 592941 VENDOR 127090 - MARCO OFFICE SUPPLY 210020683 311481 SUPPLIES 001-156100-651110-00000 210010582 250001 TONER AND SUPPLIES 111-138317-651110-00000 209270679 311346 INK/PHOTO PAPER 001-122240-652990-00000 210080658 311455 PAPER 113-138900-651110-00000 209260577 311346 INK/PHOTO PAPER 001-122240-652990-00000 209200666 MARCO OFFICE SUPPLY 130-157710-651930-00000 1 PAGE VCHR NET 9.89 84.15- 0.00 28.82 0.00 28.82 0.00 690.18 0.00 690.18 0.00 959.60 0.00 959.60 0.00 45.74 0.00 45.74 0.00 231.59 0.00 231.59 0.00 534.00 0.00 534.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 35.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 475.00 0.00 475.00 0.00 475.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 491.26 16.68 0.00 16.68 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000992 30000992 30000994 30001002 DESCRIPTION 209260695 311481 SUPPLIES 209260688 311481 SUPPLIES 209090635 311846 SUPPLIES 209300707 311497 COPY PAPER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156100-651110-00000 0.00 001-156100-651110-00000 0.00 130-157710-651930-00000 0.00 001-121710-651110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000971 30000971 30000971 30000971 30000971 30000971 30000971 592939 10-9-02 12-1 DELASHMET 10-09-02 i HOUR 10-10-02 8-5 9 HOURS DELASHMET 10-10-02 10-14-02 8:30 2:30 DELASHMET 5 HOUR 10-9-02 8-3:30 10-9-02 DELASHMET 10-15-02 8:30 11:30 10-15-02 DELASHMET 10-15-02 i 2:30 DELASHMET 1.5 HOURS 10-11-02 8-12 DLEASHMET 4 HOURS VENDOR 122850 - MARIA G. DELASHMET 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0,00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000640 30000638 30000638 593217 10-01-02 8-5 9 HOURS GOOCH 10-01-02 10-03-02 8- 7:30 GOOCH 10-03-02 8- 7:30 10-04-02 8-2:00 10-04-02 8-2:00 VENDOR 358810 - MARIA PIA GOOCH 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 AMT NET 95.96 553.02 2,231.56 47.98 CHECK TOTAL 16. O0 144.00 80.00 104.00 48.00 24. O0 64.00 CHECK TOTAL 144.00 168.00 96.00 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 95.96 553.02 2,231.56 47.98 5,418,45 16.00 144.00 80.00 104.00 48.00 24.00 64.00 480.00 144.00 168.00 96.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000638 DESCRIPTION 10-02-02 8:30 7:30 GOOCH 10-02-02 8:30 7:30 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001099 593231 VENDOR 364120 - MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN CONF 86927716 R HIGDON 001-121148-640300-00000 251192 R HIGDON 10/27-30/02 161 CHECK NO 430041 593293 VENDOR 900050 - MARY BURT REF 362868 M BURT REF M BURT 113-000000-115420-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 52.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001049 593126 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 312600 - MARYLAND CHILD SUPPORT ACCOUNT 001-000000-218810-00000 1 CHECK NO 30000981 30001029 592909 VENDOR 11700 - MATULAYS CONTRACTORS SUPPLY 326381 250714 MISC SUPPLIES AND SERVICE 101-163620-652990-00000 326874 310072 SHOP SUPPLIES 109-182901-652990-00000 PAGE VCHR NET 52.00 CHECK NO 30000987 593045 VENDOR 244500 - METEORLOGIX I5337231 250961 SUBSCRIPTION 495-192330-634999-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 460.00 CHECK NO 30001039 593029 PP#2 PP #2 VENDOR 218750 - METROPOLITAN LIFE 001-000000-217700-00000 001-000000-217710-00000 001-000000-217720-00000 001-000000-217730-00000 0.00 329.97 0.00 329.97 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 329.97 0.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 49.00 0.00 49.00 0.00 17.94 0.00 17.94 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 66.94 0.00 936.00 0.00 936.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 936.00 0.00 3,122.45 0.00 393.35 0.00 609.69 0.00 192.00 0.00 4,317.49 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 430050 593294 VENDOR 900050 - MICHAEL N NICHOLS REF PARKS M NICHOLS 111-156380-347990-00000 REF M NICHOLS 0.00 CHECK NO 430040 593295 VENDOR 900050 - MIMI HIRSCH BOOK REFUND M HIRSCH REFUND M HIRSCH 001-156110-347110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001052 593202 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 350580 - MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001044 593047 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 250350 - MISDU 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430089 593273 VENDOR 900030 - MITCH RILEY 9/24 P/D TRVL M.RILEY 9/24 P/D TRVL M.RILEY 101-163640-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 592943 VENDOR 129260 - MITCHELL & STARK CONSTRUCTION 30000930 ~ 204015 TO 9/24/02 413-263613-763100-73076 30000930 ~ RETAINAGE 204015 TO 9/24/02 RETAINAGE 413-000000-205100-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30000978 593225 VENDOR 361340 - MTR CONCRETE JOE DALATS 361340 250085 GOLDEGATE COM PARK POUR WALK 111-156332-634999-00000 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 80.00 CHECK TOTAL 10.80 CHECK TOTAL 109.66 CHECK TOTAL 80.00 CHECK TOTAL 6.00 CHECK TOTAL 77,720.00 7,772.00- CHECK TOTAL 650.00 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 4,317.49 80.00 80.00 10.80 10.80 109.66 109.66 80.00 80.00 6.00 6.00 77,720. O0 7,772.00- 69,948.00 650.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001014 593210 VENDOR 353390 - NANCY JENSEN-NAUFEL 8/13-10/2/02 111-156395-634999-00000 311483 8/13-10/2/02 161 CHECK NO 30000780 592910 VENDOR 13030 - NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY 0CT-2002 COLL11 001-144510-644100-00000 0CT-2002 311907 AMI' NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30000625 30000625 592911 VENDOR 13080 - NAPLES ARMAllJRE WORKS 67685 001-122240-652996-00000 250608 SUPPLIES/LABOR 67688 001-122240-652996-00000 250608 SUPPLIES/LABOR 1 PAGE CHECK NO 30001082 593146 VENDOR 322650 - NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN 9/6/02 - #5 193-101Ev$1-882100-10283 193-101541-882100-00000 203637 TO 9/6/02 VCHR NET 650.00 CHECK NO 30000827 30000844 30000827 30000615 30000844 593062 9138 V ST LOUIS 02-1516 8562-1A D SCHOLD 01-2071 9168 B ST LOUIS 02-1516 9124 L PASCAL 02-832 9076-1A A URBAY 01-2897 VENDOR 259460 - NAPLES COURT REPORTING, INC. 681-410310-634406-00000 681-410310-633042-00000 681-410310-634406-00000 681-410310-634406-00000 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 484.25 0.00 484.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 484.25 0.00 601.00 0.00 601.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 601.00 0.00 49.95 0.00 49.95 0.00 445.50 0.00 445.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 495.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,932.79 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 46,932.79 46,932.79 0.00 192.00 0.00 192.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30000844 8811-1 J BALLARD 01-1353 30000844 9140 C CHARITE 02-508 30000844 9141 J GALES 02-814 30000844 8477 K CORBY 01-3092 30000844 9093 D WILLIAMS 01-1939 30000844 8930-2 J BALLARD 01-1353 30000844 9160 I ACOSTA 02-1188 30000843 8188-1 A.F., A MINOR CHILD 01-1360 30000615 9118 L PASCAL 02-832 30000844 8449 M ORTEGA 01-2822 30000844 8562-1 D SCHOLD 01-2071 30000844 8400 M BURGESS 01-2252 30000844 T-2970 R MEDP~ANO 00-2822 30000844 8443 A GENNARO 01-1728 30000844 8094-1 R WILLIAMS 01-2047 30000844 8451 J VAN DAVIS SR 01-704 30000844 8950-1 J WASHINGTON 01-3032 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633051-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-634406-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633062-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633052-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 161 I"^"" AMT NET VCHR DISC 53.60 0.00 VCHR NET 53.60 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 10.40 0.00 10.40 45.00 0.00 45.00 204.00 0.00 204.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 204.00 0.00 204.00 60.00 348.00 0.00 408.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 220.80 0.00 220.80 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000844 30000844 30000844 30000844 30000844 30000844 30000844 30000844 30000844 30000844 30000941 30000844 30000844 30000843 30000844 30000844 30000844 DESCRIPTION 8043-1 B WEEKS 01-1400 9159 S PEAVY 02-777 T-2852 C SCOTT 01-330 9053-1 D WYLAND 02-949 8435 R PEREZ 01-2903 8596-1 L FERRO 01-2646 ETC. 8401-1 R INSKIP 01-3102 5827-2 J POPE 00-1363 8471 G PEREZ 01-813 9163 K GREY 01-2945 T-2960 F COWAN 02-668 9044-1 C WILLIAMS 8895-1 T FLICK 02-420 9105 R JOHNSON 02-391 9152 H GREEN 02-1189 9185 W PALUCH 02-1374 T-2974 J HERNANDEZ 99-1827 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633062-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633051-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633052-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633061-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633033-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633062-00000 0.00 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 99.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 99.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 352.00 0.00 352.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 66.00 0.00 66.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 36.00 0.00 36.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000844 30000844 30000844 30000844 30000844 30000843 30000844 30OOO844 30000844 DESCRIPTION 8468 B WALTERS 01-2046 9117 J DUTIL 02-6455 9185 W PALUCH 02-1374 9144 P DANIELS 02-1288 8907-1 D CORTAZAL 02-884 9178 B ST LOUIS 02-1516 9172 R STONECYPHER 02-984 9076-2 A URBAY 01-2905 9158 A GARCIA 02-560 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-634406-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000613 30000613 30000613 30000613 30000861 30000613 30000613 592912 VENDOR 2100339/053926 311046ADS 2100337/053926 311046 ADS 2100340/053926 311046 ADS 2100338/053926 311046 ADS 2092460/1230 311815 AD 2100342/053926 311046ADS 2100341/053926 311046 ADS 13300 - NAPLES DAILY NEWS 113-138312-649100-00000 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 45.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 45.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 312.00 0.00 312.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 159.00 0.00 159.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,828.80 0.00 643.20 0.00 643.20 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 175.00 0.00 175.00 643.20 0.00 643.20 643.20 0.00 643.20 1,061.28 0.00 1,061.28 643.20 0.00 643.20 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 001-101520-649100-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 643.20 0.00 643.20 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30000624 592913 VENDOR 17226 250769 FEED 13370 - NAPLES FEED & SEED. INC. 001-155410-652210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000616 592983 VENDOR 164860 - I~APLES TRUCK ACCESSORIES 117693 521-122410-646425-00000 310139 PARTS 0.00 CHECK NO 593058 VENDOR 258170 - NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE 30000611 WNO11/9Fl'O018 001-100190-649100-00000 251134 AD-HEARING EXAMINER 0.00 CHECK NO 593211 30001032 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 354000 - NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS 001-000000-217001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000605 30000607 30000606 30000834 593090 VENDOR 286930 - NEXTEL 758258414-007 8/25-9/24 758258414-007 8/25-9/24 310272 338598415-007 9/7-10/6 338598415-007 9/7-10/6 311621 649857418-006 7/25-8/24 649857418-006 7/25-8/24 311323 633697411 8/15-9/14/02 633697411 8/15-9/14/02 310551 001-155110-641700-00000 118-144211-634999-34300 144-144360-641700-00000 001-121140-641700-00000 001-121141-641700-00000 001-121143-641700-00000 001-121148-641700-00000 001-121152-641700-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 227.62 CHECK TOTAL 374.00 CHECK TOTAL 83.72 CHECK TOTAL 33,607.96 CHECK TOTAL 80.55 39.61 85.02 456.63 102.51 780.53 816.11 120.63 CHECK TOTAL 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 4,452.28 227.62 227.62 374.00 374.00 83.72 83.72 33,607.96 33,607.96 80.55 39.61 85.02 2,276.41 2,481.59 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30000842 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 593065 VENDOR 261470 - NOLEN-MARTINA REPORTING SERVICES 47032 681-410310-633011-00000 NOLEN-MARTINA - B HIGGINS 95-2284 AMT DISC 161 1 CHECK NO 593125 VENDOR 310560 - NORA SEHEULT 30000603 10/7/02 3.5 HRS SEHEULT 10/7/02 3.5 HRS 30000603 10/2/02 9.5 HRS SEHEULT 10/2/02 9.5 HRS 30000845 10/10/02 3.5 HRS SEHEULT 10/10/02 3.5 HRS 30000845 10/14/02 2.5 HRS SEHEULT 10/14/02 2.5 HRS 30000845 10/15/02 3 HRS SEHEULT 10/15/02 3 HRS 30000603 10/3/02 10.5 HRS SEHEULT 10/3/02 10.5 HRS 30000845 10/9/02 2 HRS SEHEULT 10/9/02 2 HRS 30000603 10/4/02 5 HRS SEHEULT 10/4/02 5 HRS 30000845 10/10/02 2.5 HRS SEHEULT 10/10/02 2.5 HRS 30000845 10/11/02 4.5 HRS SEHEULT 10/11/02 4.5 HRS 30000603 10/8/02 2.5 HRS SEHEULT 10/8/02 2.5 HRS 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 O.O0 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001096 593032 VENDOR 226410 - NOTARY PUBLIC UNDERWRITERS INC. SHARON FRAZIER - NOTARY 113-138935-652990-00000 251529 SHARON FRAZIER NOTARY AMT NET VCHR DISC PAGE VCHR NET 0.00 53.60 0,00 53.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 53.60 56,00 0.00 56.00 152.00 0.00 152.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 32.00 16.00 0.00 48.00 0.00 93.00 0.00 93.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 784.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 168.00 0.00 168.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001048 593174 PP #2 PP#2 VENDOR 338800 OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 001-000000-218810-00000 161 1 CHECK NO 30000942 593073 VENDOR 272950 OMNI CONTROLS, INC. 6642 441-256110-652990-00000 250774 REPLACEMENT CHART AI,fr NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30000626 593176 VENDOR 339380 1190479 250609 SVS 9/02 ONESOURCE 001-122240-634999-00000 VCHR NET 93.00 CHECK NO 30001043 593145 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 321600 ONONDAGA COUNTY SCU 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 267.86 0.00 267.86 CHECK NO 30000617 592968 VENDOR 157710 445588900-01 310531 SUPPLIES ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY INC. 130-157710-652990-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 267.86 CHECK NO 30000828 30000849 593100 VENDOR 295210 4459 205795 PROCESS SERVERS 4797 B ST LOUIS 02-1516 ORTINO ENTERPRISES 313-163673-631990-62071 681-410310-634406-00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 30000614 593116 VENDOR 304150 - OSMONICS INC 90231388 250610 PARTS 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 42.56 0.00 42.56 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 42.56 0.00 94.00 0.00 94.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 94.00 0.00 835.43 0.00 835.43 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 835.43 0.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 1,037. O0 O. O0 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,037. O0 1,107. O0 0.00 169.80 0.00 169.80 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 430082 593274 VENDOR 900030 - PAUL LAVALLEE 10/6-9/02 TRVL P.LAVALLEE 10/6-9/02 TRVL P.LAVALLEE 001-121148-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000927 593204 VENDOR 350630 - PBS & O CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 168931 313-163673-631400-60109 204087 4/1-8/31/02 0.00 CHECK NO 30001178 593042 VENDOR 241150 - PETER KRALEY 10/4-11/02 TRVL P.KRALEY 10/4-11/02 TRVL P.KRALEY 001-155230-640300-00000 161 1 CHECK NO 30001189 30001189 30001189 30001188 30001189 30001188 30001189 30001189 30001189 593079 348748 311191 FUEL 348291 311191 FUEL 347199 311191 FUEL 350886 311191 FUEL 349818 311191 FUEL 352698 311191 FUEL 346016 311191 FUEL 348601 311191 FUEL 346787 311191 FUEL VENDOR 276020 - PETROLEUM TRADERS CORP. 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 169.80 52.70 0.00 52.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 52.70 13,575.32 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13,575.32 13,575.32 0.00 129.54 0.00 129.54 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 129.54 0.00 0.00 1,312.88 0.00 2,375.69 O. O0 1,312.88 2,375.69 0.00 403.38 0.00 403.38 3,633.99 0.00 2,339.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,633.99 2,339.21 0.00 198.94 0.00 198.94 0.00 178.08 0.00 178.08 0.00 469.92 0.00 469.92 0.00 709.53 0.00 709.53 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001188 352699 311191 FUEL 30001188 351270 311191 FUEL 30001187 350073 311191 FUEL 30001189 348719 311191 FUEL 30001187 349476 311191 FUEL 30001188 350882 311191 FUEL 30001189 348287 311191 FUEL 30001188 350888 311191 FUEL 30001188 351269 311191 FUEL 30001187 350074 311191 FUEL 30001188 350881 311191 FUEL 30001189 349819 311191 FUEL 30001189 347198 311191 FUEL 30001189 346017 311191 FUEL 30001189 346014 311191 FUEL 30001189 348599 311191 FUEL 30001189 348288 311191 FUEL DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0,00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 646.06 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 646.06 614.66 0.00 614.66 1,169.60 0.00 1,169.60 195.06 0.00 195.06 4,005.91 0.00 3,412.09 0.00 2,955.66 0.00 6,241.21 0.00 1,205.51 0.00 4,005.91 3,412.09 2,955.66 6,241.21 1,205.51 598.86 0.00 598.86 6,766.40 0.00 6,766.40 479.08 0.00 479.08 1,141.67 O. O0 1,141.67 461.34 0.00 461.34 217.81 0.00 217.81 294.10 0.00 294.10 3,568.11 0.00 3,568.11 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001189 348607 311191 FUEL 30001187 349475 311191 FUEL 30001189 346015 311191 FUEL 30001187 348951 311191 FUEL 30001189 346018 311191 FUEL 30001189 346013 311191 FUEL DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000604 593119 VENDOR 305460 - PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORPORATION 4673225-SP02 310017 RENT POSTAGE METER 109-182601-641950-00000 0.00 109-182900-641950-00000 0.00 778-182700-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593132 VENDOR 315440 - PLUMBMASTER 30000833 51363832 311390 SUPPLIES 30000833 51368029 311390 SUPPLIES 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001097 593185 VENDOR 344980 - PMI IMAGING SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA 7183 408-210151-646710-00000 311204 10/1/02-9/30/03 MAINT 0,00 CHECK NO 30001190 592856 VENDOR PERMIT#499 AND 15130 - POSTMASTER 408-210151-641950-00000 0.00 161 AMT NET 6,800.25 5,836.26 318.13 1,209.70 2,401.03 1,073.60 CHECK TOTAL 55.66 55.66 55.66 CHECK TOTAL 83.90 1,795.28 CHECK TOTAL 880.00 CHECK TOTAL 13,214.60 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 6,800.25 5,836.26 318.13 1,209.70 2,401.03 1,073.60 63,233.72 166.98 166.98 83.90 1,795.28 1,879.18 880.00 880.00 13,214.60 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30000620 30000621 593055 VENDOR 255770 - PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST,LLC PJ 377317 408-233351-652990-00000 310558 SUPPLIES PJ377320 408-253211-652990-00000 310639 SUPPLIES AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 30000608 593068 VENDOR 264400 - PREFERRED TRAVEL OF NAPLES C765 S MARESCA 9/24-25 681-421190-640101-00000 S MARESCA 9/24-25 01-1432 VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 30000619 593230 VENDOR 363380 - PRIDE ENTERPRISES ZI088059 114-178970-647110-00000 311807 PRINTING VCHR NET 13,214.60 CHECK NO 30000622 593070 VENDOR 267130 - PROFESSIONAL BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. 29568 111-156332-634999-00000 250087 SVS 0.00 650.00 0.00 650.00 CHECK NO 30000618 593186 VENDOR 345140 - PROVIDENT CAPITAL 1312282 001-157110-644620-00000 311353 10/02 0.00 230.98 0.00 230.98 CHECK NO 30000612 593017 VENDOR 199640 - QUILL CORP. 5483566 251030 PAD HOLDER 001-156175-652610-00000 0.00 30.98 0.00 30.98 CHECK NO 30000840 593164 VENDOR 334120 - RANDY MACDONALD REIMB CLASS A EXAM 408-233312-649010-00000 250225 MACDONALD REIMB CLASS A 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 164.25 0.00 164.25 0.00 698.00 0.00 698.00 0.00 23.17 0.00 23.17 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 56.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 698.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 164.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 650.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 230.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30.98 0.00 33.08 0.00 33.08 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001174 593134 VENDOR 318010 - RAY HIGDON 10/27-30/02 ADV P/D R.HIG 10/27-30/02 ADV P/D R.HIGDON 001-121148-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000609 30000609 593149 VENDOR 323340 - RECYCLE FLORIDA TODAY, INC. DUES - D KIRK 470-173463-654210-00000 250376 DUES - D KIRK DUES - JANET GO 470-173463-654210-00000 250376 DUES - JANET GO AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 30000772 593212 VENDOR 354590 - REEVES OF SW FLORIDA, INC. 15372 191-138785-884200-33752 48790240008 SWEEKS 250951 VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 30000610 593131 VENDOR 315150 - REXEL CONSOLIDATED 12-282192 001-122240-652991-00000 250612 SUPPLIES PAGE CHECK NO 30000841 593153 VENDOR 328990 - REXFORD G. DARROW, II M SPRING 01-3017 681-421190-631020-00000 M SPRING 01-3017 VCHR NET 100.00 CHECK NO 430038 593312 VENDOR 900140 - RICHARD A GREER, M.D. R PATTEN 01-176CF R GREER 681-421190-631010-00000 R GREER - R PATTEN 01-176CF 75.00 0,00 75,00 CHECK NO 30000623 593255 VENDOR 365690 - RISK AND INSURANCE MANAGEMENT 111975 516-121650-654110-00000 250949 DUES- J HOLLOCHER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 0.00 987.07 0.00 987.07 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 987.07 0.00 32.40 0.00 32.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 32.40 0.00 900.00 0.00 900.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 go0.o0 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,000.00 3.000.00 0.00 545.00 0.00 545.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30000873 593171 VENDOR 337780 - ROBERT ABREU 10/7-9/02 TRVL R.ABREU 10/7-9/02 TRVL R.ABREU 312-163615-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000888 593129 VENDOR 313860 - ROBERTA REISS 9/30-10/1/02 TRVL R.REISS 9/30-10/1/02 TRVL R.REISS 001-156130-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001111 593151 VENDOR 325200 - ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY CONTINUING CONF 632760094-001 113-138935-654360-00000 113-138935-654110-00000 250457 A SMILEY 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 430066 593304 VENDOR 900100 - ROETZEL & ANDRESS OVRPYMT 51000-376954 410-000000-121200-00000 OVRPYMT 51000-376954 0.00 CHECK NO 30000835 30000837 30000836 593112 VENDOR 301300 - ROLSAFE REF 362140 ROLSAFE REF 362140 ROLSAFE REF 362142 ROLSAFE ROLSAFE 362142 REF 362134 ROLSAFE ROLSAFE REF 362134 113-138900-322110-00000 113-138900-322110-00000 113-138900-322110-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 430063 430064 593296 VENDOR 900050 - RON WINTERS REF ADOPTION R. WINTERS REFADOPTION R. WINTERS REFADOPTION R. WINTERS REF ADOPTION R. WINTERS 001-155410-346410-00000 610-155410-346450-00000 0.00 0.00 AMI' NET CHECK TOTAL 67.50 CHECK TOTAL 218.08 CHECK TOTAL 139.00 12.95 CHECK TOTAL 28.59 CHECK TOTAL 22.00 22.00 22.00 CHECK TOTAL 20.00 30.00 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 545.00 67.50 67.50 218.08 218.08 151.95 151.95 28.59 28.59 22.00 22.00 22.00 66. O0 20.00 30.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30000846 593261 VENDOR 365860 - ROSAURA BURGOS 10/1/02 5 HRS 681-421190-634402-00000 RURGOS 10/1/02 5 HRS CHECK NO 30000863 592914 VENDOR 32798 250005 BELTS 16520 - SARLO POWER MOWERS, INC. 521-122410-646425-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001101 593118 VENDOR 304880 - SCOTT CONLEY REIMB TANKER ENDORSEMENT 251141 RIEMB TANKER ENDORSEMENT 408-253212-649010-00000 PAGE CHECK NO 30000904 30000904 30000904 30000904 30000904 30000904 30000904 30001065 30000904 593012 090003956 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090004092 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090003928 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090004044 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090004055 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090003913 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090004043 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090003971 310274 PAINT 090003960 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT VENDOR 193330 - SCOI-F PAINT CORP. 001-122240-652999-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 408-253212-652990-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 VCHR NET 50.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 80.00 0.00 15.92 0.00 15.92 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 15.92 0.00 20.25 0.00 20.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.25 0.00 20.72 0.00 20.72 0.00 15.57 0.00 15.57 0.00 71.12 0.00 71.12 0.00 48.07 0.00 48.07 0.00 49.19 0.00 49.19 0.00 6.47 0.00 6.47 0.00 14.93 0.00 14.93 0.00 134.28 0.00 134.28 0.00 146.58 0.00 146.58 OCTOBER 23. 2002 PAGE REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000453 30000904 30000904 30000904 30000904 30000904 30000904 30000904 DESCRIPTION 090004009 310319 PAINT 090004034 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090003987 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090004095 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090004062 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090004049 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090003828 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT 090003921 311383 SUPPLIES/PAINT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-210130-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000864 592915 VENDOR 17221 250613 LABOR 16700 - SEWELL DOOR CONTROL & GLASS 001-122240-646110-00000 CHECK NO 30001077 30001077 593086 VENDOR 282410 - SHAMROCK PLUMBING & MECHANICAL INC 35090 001-122240-652994-00000 311381 LABOR 35110 001-122240-652994-00000 311381 LABOR AMT NET VCHR DISC 126.78 0.00 1 CHECK NO 430068 430067 593297 VENDOR 900050 - SHARON RUTKUICH REF PARKS S. RUTKUICH 111-000000-208901-00000 REF PARKS S. RUTKUICH REF P~,RKS S. RUTKUICH 111-156313-347911-00000 REF PARKS S. RUTKUICH VCHR NET 126.78 0.00 155.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 9.30 0.00 9.30 0.00 265.16 0.00 265.16 0.00 660.00 0.00 660.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 105.00 13.62 0.00 13.62 109.90 0.00 109.90 20.74 0.00 20.74 16.45 0.00 16.45 18.37 0.00 18.37 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 926.49 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 105.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 925.16 71.32 0.00 71.32 42.38 0.00 42.38 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30000882 593242 VENDOR 365370 - SHEREE MEDIAVILLA REIMB. 10/11/02 LUNCH 516-121650-649990-00000 250942 REIMB. 10/11/02 LUNCH 0.00 CHECK NO 30000894 593064 VENDOR 260690 - SIGNCRAFT 19785 206604 SIGN 195-116360-763100-10520 0.00 CHECK NO 30001064 593215 VENDOR 357890 - SIRSI CORPORATION SMLT 100083 129-156112-634200-33774 311914 10/02 0.00 CHECK NO 593005 30001170 7039618 250409 D.HOLMES 30001170 7039619 250409 K.JOKELA 30001170 7039616 250409 M.CALLIS 30001170 7039617 250409 K.EAGER 30001170 7039620 250409 J.VALINSKY VENDOR 185830 - SKILLPATH, INC. 001-122240-654370-00000 001-122240-654370-00000 001-122240-654370-00000 001-122240-654370-00000 001-122240-654370-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 592916 VENDOR 17080 - SKIP CAMP 30000889 10/5-9/02 P/D TRVL S.CAMP 10/5-9/02 P/D TRVL S.CAMP 001-122240-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 592932 VENDOR 114210 - SMALL ENGINE WORLD 161 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,120.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,990.00 CHECK TOTAL 139.00 139. O0 139.00 139.00 139.00 CHECK TOTAL 843.94 CHECK TOTAL 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 100 VCHR NET 164.30 15.00 15.00 2,120.00 2,120.00 2,990.00 2,990.00 139.00 139.00 139.00 139.00 139.00 695.00 843.94 843.94 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001071 015762 310048 PARTS 30001071 15664 310048 PARTS 3000107i 15866 310048 PARTS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 O.O0 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593305 VENDOR 900100 430070 OVRPY~ff 80-15817 OVRPYMT 80-15817 SMITH,HIA1-F.& DIAZ 226-000000-121900-00000 161 1 CHECK NO 30001106 593013 VENDOR 193860 SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MG~T REGIST- G CARTER 10/27-30 101-163609-654360-00000 250497 G CARTER 10/27-30/02 AMT NET VCHR DISC 11.20 0.00 CHECK NO 30001079 593127 VENDOR 313450 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 94AB5 101-163620-651950-00000 250953 ADOBE ACROBAT/AUTOCARD LT PAGE 101 CHECK NO 30000893 593085 VENDOR 282370 654 310724 SERVICE SOUTHWEST ELECTRIC. INC. 408-253221-634999-00000 VCHR NET 11.20 CHECK NO 30001055 593120 PP#2 PP#2 VENDOR 305680 SOUTHWEST FL PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHT 001-000000-218700-00000 58.55 0.00 58.55 CHECK NO 30000866 593030 VENDOR 221660 SPECIALTY STORE SERVICES 832201 001-156175-652610-00000 001-156175-641950-00000 250648 PROCESSING SUPPLIES 33.22- 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 33.22- 36.53 0.00 72.89 0.00 72.89 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 72.89 0.00 615.00 0.00 615.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 615.00 0.00 877.37 0.00 877.37 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 877.37 1.192.83 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.000.22 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 320.00 0.00 76.80 0.00 1.192.83 1.192.83 2,000.22 2.000.22 396.80 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30000900 593014 VENDOR 195660 - SPECTRUM PAINTING & RESTORATION 640 001-122240-639961-00000 311379 LABOR CHECK NO 30000901 592917 VENDOR 17410 - SPEEDY BLUEPRINTING 10208124 322-183825-651210-51125 310826 BLUELINES BID#02-3365 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30000826 593046 VENDOR 250020 - SPRINT 923011246 9/26 923011246 9/26 101-163620-643400-00000 PAGE 102 CHECK NO 30000817 30001158 30001088 30001158 30001012 30001158 30001088 30001094 593054 VENDOR 255040 - SPRINT 695 2226 723 10/4-11/3 695 2226 723 10/4-11/3 455 2275 227 10/10-11/9 455 2275 227 10/10-11/9 394 3402 652 10/7-11/6 394 3402 652 10/7-11/6 455 9282 744 10/10-11/9 455 9282 744 10/10-11/9 657 3232 716 9/28-10/27 657 3232 716 9/28-10/27 455 1202 295 10/10-11/9 455 1202 295 10/11-11/9 101 1724 306 10/1-10/31 101 1724 306 10/1-10/31 394 3355 969 10/7-11/6 394 3355 969 10/7-11/6 311472 521-122450-641400-00000 408-253221-641100-00000 001-122240-641900-00000 001-156363-641900-00000 001-000000-202800-00000 408-253211-641100-00000 408-253212-641100-00000 408-253221-641100-00000 495-192370-641900-00000 VCHR NET 396.80 0.00 771.95 0.00 771.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 771.95 0.00 220.50 0.00 220.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 220.50 0.00 18.18 0.00 18.18 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 18.18 0.00 23.36 0.00 23.36 0.00 69.52 0.00 69.52 0.00 31.45 0.00 31.45 0.00 88.47 0.00 88.47 0.00 28.69 0.00 28.69 0.00 36.29 0.00 102.95 0.00 139.24 0,00 407.28 0.00 407.28 0.00 147.40 0.00 147.40 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001088 30001012 30000817 30000817 30001012 30001012 30000817 30000817 30001088 30001158 30001088 30001012 30001012 30000817 30001088 30001158 DESCRIPTION 394 6750 137 10/7-11/6 394 6750 137 10/7-11/6 657 3232 716 8/28-9/27 657 3232 716 8/28-9/27 695 4331 144 10/4-11/3 695 4331 144 10/4-11/3 394 2793 738 10/7-11/6 394 2793 738 10/7-11/6 092 2026 143 9/16-10/15 092 2026 143 9/16-10/15 732 2700 159 9/22-10/21 732 2700 159 9/22-10/21 695 4425 196 10/4-11/3 695 4425 196 10/4-11/3 597 2265 030 10/7-11/6 597 2265 030 10/7-11/6 695 3473 779 10/4-11/3 695 3473 779 10/4-11/3 352 1995 446 10/13-11/12 352 1995 446 10/13-11/12 593 0336 468 10/4-11/3 593 0336 468 10/4-11/3 732 3168 316 9/22-10/21 732 3168 316 9/22-10/21 657 1035 739 9/28-10/27 657 1035 739 9/28-10/27 642 6652 151 10/4-11/3 642 6652 151 10/4-11/3 101 1739 184 10/1-10/31 101 1739 184 10/1-10/31 261 5010 616 9/25-10/24 261 5010 616 9/25-10/24 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 441-256110-641100-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 470-173443-641900-00000 0.00 001-156363-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 188-140480-641400-00000 0.00 109-182601-641400-00000 0.00 109-182900-641400-00000 0.00 778-182700-641400-00000 0.00 146-144380-641900-00000 0.00 111-156332-641900-00000 0,00 408-233313-641100-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 521-122450-641400-00000 0.00 408-253221-641100-00000 0.00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 161 I ' AMT NET VCHR DISC 32.12 0.00 PAGE 103 VCHR NET 32.12 28.69 0.00 28.69 44.79 0.00 44.79 27.81 0.00 27.81 206.30 0.00 206.30 1,031.30 0.00 1,031.30 26.01 0.00 26.01 62.20 62.20 38.86 0.00 163.26 44.61 0.00 44.61 23.11 0.00 23.11 160.00 0.00 160.00 28.90 0.00 28.90 42.33 0.00 42.33 116.93 0.00 116.93 62.94 0.00 62.94 61.98 0.00 61.98 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30001088 101 1824 383 10/1-10/31 101 1824 383 10/1-10/31 30001158 793 4055 481 10/13-11/12 793 4055 481 10/13-11/12 30001158 352 1991 791 10/13-11/12 352 1991 791 10/13-11/12 30000817 394 2134 664 10/7-11/6 394 2134 664 10/7-11/6 30001012 775 6687 010 9/22-10/21 775 6687 010 9/22-10/21 30001012 774 9106 107 9/19-10/18 774 9106 107 9/19-10/18 30001012 774 9356 752 9/19-10/18 774 9356 752 9/19-10/18 30000817 597 6707 284 10/7-11/6 597 6707 284 10/7-11/6 30001088 348 9083 255 10/7-11/6 348 9083 255 10/7-11/6 30001012 774 7686 686 9/19-10/18 774 7686 686 9/19-10/18 30000817 657 6566 069 9/28-10/27 657 6566 069 9/28-10/27 30001012 774 9207 207 9/19-10/18 774 9207 207 9/19-10/18 30001088 261 2590 318 9/25-10/24 261 2590 318 9/25-10/24 30001012 101 1919 850 9/1-30/02 101 1919 850 9/1-30/02 30001012 774 8049 140 9/19-10/18 774 8049 140 9/19-10/18 30000817 394 0372 557 10/7-11/6 394 0372 557 10/7-11/6 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-253212-641100-00000 0.00 111-156341-641900-00000 0.00 111-156332-641900-00000 0.00 111-156395-641900-00000 0.00 470-173442-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 109-182601-641400-00000 0.00 109-182900-641400-00000 0.00 778-182700-641400-00000 0.00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 470-173435-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 101-163612-641400-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 408-253212-641100-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 140.00 0.00 PAGE 104 VCHR NET 140.00 63.10 0.00 63.10 65.78 32.88 0.00 98.66 77.00 0.00 77.00 33.77 0.00 33.77 33.77 0.00 33.77 33.77 0.00 33.77 12.87 12.87 8.03 0.00 33.77 31.45 0.00 31.45 23.03 0.00 23.03 118.79 0.00 118.79 51.22 0.00 51.22 31.45 0.00 31.45 296.40 0.00 296.40 1,632.39 0.00 1,632.39 34.35 0.00 34.35 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000817 30001012 30001012 30001088 30001088 30001012 30001012 30001012 30001158 30001012 30001088 30001158 30000817 30001088 30000817 30001158 DESCRIPTION 597 1749 015 10/7-11/6 597 1749 015 10/7-11/6 657 8228 320 8/28-9/27 657 8228 320 8/28-9/27 334 6249 326 9/4-10/3 334 6249 326 9/4-10/3 695 4114 945 10/4-11/3 695 4114 945 10/4-11/3 695 4450 232 10/4-11/3 695 4450 232 10/4-11/3 101 2081 379 9/1-30/02 101 2081 379 9/1-30/02 658 7300 233 9/13-10/12 658 7300 233 9/13-10/02 643 6575 575 9/16-10/15 643 6575 575 9/16-10/15 455 5051 078 10/10-11/9 455 5051 078 10/10-11/9 657 8228 320 9/28-10/27 657 8228 320 9/28-10/27 597 8078 038 10/7-11/6 597 8078 038 10/7-11/6 793 4414 098 10/13-11/12 793 4414 098 10/13-11/12 695 4130 604 10/4-11/3 695 4130 604 10/4-11/3 348 2784 799 10/7-11/6 348 2784 799 10/7-11/6 394 7776 689 10/7-11/6 394 7776 689 10/7-11/6 455 2830 960 10/10-11/9 455 2830 960 10/10-11/9 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182601-641400-00000 0.00 109-182900-641400-00000 0.00 778-182700-641400-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 146-144380-641900-00000 0.00 146-144380-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 470-173435-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 408-233313-641100-00000 0.00 111-156332-641900-00000 0.00 111-156380-641900-00000 0.00 188-140480-641400-00000 0.00 408-253211-641100-00000 0.00 001-156160-641900-00000 0.00 470-173435-641900-00000 0,00 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 52.67 52.67 32.90 O. O0 1 PAGE 105 VCHR NET 138.24 53.23 0.00 53.23 991.21 0.00 991.21 74.21 0.00 74.21 43.79 0.00 43.79 298.25 0.00 298.25 553.71 0.00 553.71 1,945.32 0.00 1,945.32 33.57 0.00 33.57 48.40 0.00 48.40 31.14 O. O0 31.14 33.80 159.17 0.00 192.97 87.99 0.00 87.99 33.55 0.00 33.55 50.34 0.00 50.34 61.22 0.00 61.22 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001088 101 1680 101 1680 30001012 213 5800 213 5800 30000817 513 1235 513 1235 30001158 597 9189 597 9189 30000817 394 6835 394 6835 30001012 774 8999 774 8999 30001012 658 0781 658 0781 30001012 643 8400 643 8400 30000817 597 3653 597 3653 30000817 597 1737 597 1737 30001012 530 5300 530 5300 30001094 642 7878 642 7878 30001088 597 5355 597 5355 30001158 597 7209 597 7209 30000817 394 3272 394 3272 30001088 101 1371 101 1371 30000817 394 2383 394 2383 DESCRIPTION 085 10/1-10/31 085 10/1-10/31 861 9/1-30/02 861 9/1-30/02 601 10/4-11/3 601 10/4-11/3 699 10/7-11/6 699 10/7-11/6 931 10/7-11/6 931 10/7-11/6 001 9/19-10/18 001 9/19-10/18 466 9/13-10/12 466 9/13-10/12 400 9/16-10/15 400 9/16-10/15 597 10/7-11/6 597 10/7-11/6 074 10/7-11/6 074 10/7-11/6 097 9/16-10/15 097 9/16-10/15 920 10/4-11/3 930 10/4-1103 311472 941 10/7-11/6 941 10/7-11/6 311 10/7-11/6 311 10/7-11/6 147 10/7-11/6 147 10/7-11/6 919 10/1-10/31 919 10/1-10/31 111 10/7-11/6 111 10/7-11/6 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233352-641100-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 188-140480-641400-00000 0.00 129-156112-634999-33015 0.00 521-122450-641400-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-156175-641900-00000 0.00 001-156170-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 495-192370-641900-00000 0.00 408-233312-641100-00000 0.00 129-156112-634999-33015 0.00 001-156160-641900-00000 0.00 408-233352-641100-00000 0.00 001-156160-641210-00000 0.00 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 140.00 0.00 IPAGE 106 VCHR NET 140.00 888.74 0.00 888.74 26.06 0.00 26.06 36.15 0.00 36,15 28.90 0.00 28.90 6,740.47 0.00 6,740.47 34.14 0.00 34.14 2,304.44 0.00 2,304.44 36.90 0.00 36.90 465.00 0.00 465.00 2,275.72 0.00 2,275.72 34.27 0.00 34.27 88.00 0.00 88.00 86.08 0.00 86.08 37.89 0.00 37.89 157.45 0.00 157.45 349.76 0.00 349.76 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000817 30000817 DESCRIPTION 101 2104 735 10/1-10/31 101 2104 735 10/1-10/31 597 8444 092 10/7-11/6 597 8444 092 10/7-11/6 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 188-140480-641400-00000 0.00 001-156170-641900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001203 30000818 593200 VENDOR 349940 - SPRINT 455 7891 012 10/10-11/9 455 7891 012 10/10-11/9 311579 101 2218 703 10/1-10/31 101 2218 703 10/1-10/31 311304 111-156390-641900-00000 0.00 130-157710-641900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001093 30001157 593173 VENDOR 338370 - SPRINT YELLOW PAGES 300164257 10/7/02 495-192370-641900-00000 300164257 10/7/02 311474 206811078 10/4/02 113-138900-634999-00000 206811078 10/4/02 311463 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 184.10 0.00 CHECK NO 30001075 592938 VENDOR 120640 - ST. FRANCIS II ANIMAL CLINIC 02-100567 D SCHLOTTMAN 610-155413-631970-00000 311690 02-100567 D SCHLOTTMAN PAGE 107 CHECK NO 593196 30001051 PP #2 PP~2 VENDOR 347970 - STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 001-000000-218810-00000 VCHR NET 184.10 CHECK NO 593114 30001041 PP~K2 PP ~2 VENDOR 301540 - STATE OF FLORIDA DISBURSMENT UNIT 001-000000-218810-00000 108.86 0.00 108.86 CHECK NO 592978 VENDOR 163460 - STEVEN P. MARESCA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 24,429.48 109.00 0.00 109.00 109.00 0.00 109.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 218.00 0.00 47.50 0.00 47.50 0.00 48.50 0.00 48.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 96.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 140.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 140.00 0.00 6,777.65 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6.777.65 6,777.65 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000903 DESCRIPTION A.CARPENTER 01-204CF-LLM A.CARPENTER 01-204CF-LLM COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-421190-640101-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000896 593155 VENDOR 329930 - SUMMERLIN'S SEVEN SEAS, INC. 1129 117-178981-634999-44001 207099 REMOVE/DISPOSE 0.00 CHECK NO 430075 593313 VENDOR 900140 - SUNCOAST SCHOOLS FED CREDIT UNION SUBPEONA-N SORIA 2836819 681-421190-634401-00000 SUNCOAST FED CRED 02-1842 N BERLAND 0.00 CHECK NO 30000905 30000905 30000905 30001080 30001078 30000905 592918 VENDOR 17660 - SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 106959 001-122240-652990-00000 311376 SUPPLIES 105879 001-122240-652987-00000 311376 SUPPLIES 106801 001-122240-652987-00000 311376 SUPPLIES 486925 408-233351-652910-00000 310582 SUPPLIES 384108 130-157710-652910-00000 130-157710-652990-00000 310889 SUPPLIES 106352 001-122240-652990-00000 311376 SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001068 30001066 593019 VENDOR 200380 - SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 384231 408-253221-652990-00000 310725 SUPPLIES 385018 408-253211-652990-00000 310192 SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 ~ NET 92.48 CHECK TOTAL 15,000.00 CHECK TOTAL 44.25 CHECK TOTAL 32.82 2.16 0.79 19.99 34.65 550.56 4.76 CHECK TOTAL 12.22 107.13 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 92.48 92.48 15,000.00 15,000.00 108 44.25 44.25 32.82 2.16 O. 79 19.99 585.21 4.76 645.73 12.22 107.13 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001066 384224 310192 30001068 384374 310725 30001068 384271 310725 30001067 383952 310286 30001068 384480 310725 30001067 384844 310286 30001066 384909 310192 30001067 384475 310286 30001068 384228 310725 30001068 384727 310725 30001068 384890 310725 30001066 384892 310192 30001066 384967 310192 30001066 384704 310192 30001066 384763 310192 30001068 384892 310725 DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO ART DISC 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253212-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253212-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253212-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253212-652990-00000 0.00 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 52.28 0.00 1 PAGE 109 VCHR NET 52.28 86.81 0.00 86.81 19.46 0.00 19.46 2.42 0.00 2.42 23.17 0.00 23.17 37.65 0.00 37.65 53.01 0.00 53.01 32.97 0.00 32.97 8.54 0.00 8.54 35.91 0.00 35.91 68.22 0.00 68.22 156.08 0.00 156.08 18.86 0.00 18.86 144.21 0.00 144.21 65.60 0.00 65.60 17.63 0.00 17.63 26.33 0.00 26.33 30001067 384880 310286 SUPPLIES OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001068 384332 310725 30001066 384792 310192 30001067 384889 310286 30001068 384684 310725 DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253212-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430086 593275 VENDOR 900030 - SUZANNE L. FRITZ 10/16 TRVL S.FRITZ 001-156110-640300-00000 10/16 TRVL S. FRITZ 0.00 CHECK NO 30001069 30001070 30001069 30001070 30001069 30001069 30001069 30001070 30001069 593189 296387 311447 OIL CHANGES 188745 311447 OIL CHANGE 188301 311447 OIL CHANGES 188834 311447 OIL CHANGE 188442 311447 OIL CHANGES 188503 311447 OIL CHANGES 296805 311447 OIL CHANGES 188563 311447 OIL CHANGE 296591 311447 OIL CHANGES VENDOR 345700 - SWIFT OIL CHANGE INC 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 44.64 21.22 8.66 53.47 CHECK TOTAL 20.50 CHECK TOTAL 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22,00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AGE 110 VCHR NET 44.64 21.22 8.66 53.47 1,096.49 20.50 20.50 22. O0 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001069 296616 311447 30001069 296806 311447 30001069 188492 311447 30001070 188347 311447 30001070 188828 311447 30001069 188055 311447 30001069 296409 311447 30001070 297401 311447 30001069 188478 311447 30001069 188084 311447 30001070 188273 311447 30001069 296663 311447 30001069 188855 311447 30001069 188024 311447 30001069 188202 311447 30001069 296546 311447 DESCRIPTION OIL CHANGES OIL CHANGES OIL CHANGES OIL CHANGE OIL CHANGE OIL CHANGES OIL CHANGES OIL CHANGE OIL CHANGES OIL CHANGES OIL CHANGE OIL CHANGES OIL CHANGES OIL CHANGES OIL CHANGES OIL CHANGES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0,00 521-122410-646425-00000 O.OO 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 111 VCHR NET 22.00 22. O0 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 550.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 592920 VENDOR 30000899 100623 310150 PARTS 30000899 100741 310150 PARTS 30000899 CM100653 310150 PARTS 30000899 100787 310150 PARTS 30000899 100751 310150 PARTS 30000898 595457 310150 PARTS 30000899 100658 310150 PARTS 30000899 CM100652 310150 PARTS 30000899 CM97213 310150 PARTS 30000899 100782 310150 PARTS 30000899 CM100787 310150 PARTS 30000899 100656 310150 PARTS 30000899 CM1006522 310150 PARTS 30000899 CM1006521 310150 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 18020 - TAMIAMI FORD INC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0,00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000879 593121 VENDOR 307400 - TAMMY SMITH 10/6-9/02 TRVL T.SMITH 10/6-9/02 TRVL T.SMITH 001-121148-640300-00000 0.00 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1 PAGE 112 VCHR NET 76.02 0.00 76.02 331.41 0.00 331.41 75.00 0.00 75.00 204.66 0.00 204.66 44.24 0.00 44.24 18.06 0.00 18.06 16.81 0.00 16.81 75.00- 0.00 66.74- 0.00 75.00- 66.74- 19.70 0.00 19.70 75.00- 0.00 75.00- 37.86 0.00 37,86 75.00- 0.00 129.66- 0.00 75.00- 129.66- 16.00 0.00 16.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 402.36 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 161 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 16.00 113 CHECK NO 30001180 30001180 592936 VENDOR 117110 - TAMPA BAY TRANE SERVICE 315117 001-122240-652997-00000 311375 SERVICE 316099 001-122240-652997-00000 311375 SERVICE 0.00 0.00 6,847.20 1.818.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,847.20 1,818.00 8.665.20 CHECK NO 30001072 30001072 593117 VENDOR 304690 - TAPS AUTOMOTIVE 21041 310077 PARTS 521-122410-646415-00000 21047 310077 PARTS 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 0.00 22.95 22.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.95 22.95 45.90 CHECK NO 430084 593276 VENDOR 900030 - TERRI MEYER 9/24 P/D TRVL T.MEYER 9/24 P/D TRVL T. MEYER 101-163640-640300-00000 0.00 21.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 21.00 21.00 CHECK NO 30000860 593094 VENDOR 289190 - TERRY LURRIE, PA & VICTOR MARRERO REF 365078 TOLL BROTHERS 113-000000-115420-00000 REF 365078 TOLL BROTHERS 0.00 10.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 CHECK NO 30000691 593205 VENDOR 351550 - THE BUTLER COMPANY 6044367 250772 MEDICAL 001-155410-652720-00000 001-155410-652710-00000 001-155410-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.94 17.88 5.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 64.82 64.82 CHECK NO 30001026 592925 VENDOR 103380 - THE FLORIDA BAR FL BAR JOURNAL L.MILLER 001-421040-654110-00000 251154 FL BAR JOURNAL L.MILLER 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 593027 VENDOR 216810 - THE STATE CHEMICAL liANUFACTURING CO 30000862 91675859 001-122240-652510-00000 250615 SCRUB SKIN CLEENERS 161 1 CHECK NO 30001098 593142 VENDOR 321250 - THE WESTIN CINCINNATI CONF 497204856 AXELROD 001-121152-640300-00000 251156 B AXELROD 11/6-9/02 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 430083 593277 VENDOR 900030 - THOFta, S PERCHOUX 10/15-17 P/D T.PERCHOUX 521-122410-640300-00000 10/15-17 P/D T.PERCHOUX PAGE 114 CHECK NO 30000897 593195 VENDOR 347620 - TIME WARNER CABLE 9/26/02 8381480510429646 111-156313-643500-00000 310212 9/26/02 8381 48 051 0429646 VCHR NET 30.00 CHECK NO 30000859 30001112 593082 VENDOR 280250 - TITAN CUSTOM HOMES REF 364079 TITAN CUSTOM 113-000000-115420-00000 REF 364079 TITAN CUSTOM HOMES REF 365468 TITAN CUSTOM 113-000000-115420-00000 TITAN CUSTOM REF 365468 0.00 134.10 0.00 134.10 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 134.10 CHECK NO 30001074 30001074 592952 VENDOR 136090 - TOWN & COUNTRY 02-10096 B BERN/%RD 610-155413-631970-00000 316692 02-10096 B BERNARD 02-10501 J GOLDMAN 610-155413-631970-00000 316692 02-10501 J GOLDI'UkN 0.00 386.40 0,00 386.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 386.40 0.00 33.00 0.00 33.00 CHECK TOTAL 0,00 33.00 0.00 12.95 0.00 12.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 12.95 0.00 455.25 0.00 455.25 0.00 362.42 0.00 362.42 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 817.67 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 130.00 OCTOBER 23. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001181 30001181 593096 315583 311371 SERVICE 314258 311371 SERVICE DESCRIPTION VENDOR 290610 - TRANE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001110 593097 VENDOR 291440 - TRAVEL CREATIONS B AXELROD 11/6-9/02 001-121152-640300-00000 251150 B AXELROD 11/6-9/02 CHECK NO 30000902 592964 VENDOR 153470 - TRIARCO 572095 310901 SUPPLIES 111-156395-652990-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30001076 593260 VENDOR 365830 - TRICKS-N-TREAT, INC. 10/29 JUGGLING/BALLOONS 130-157710-634999-00000 250199 10/29 JUGGLING/BALLOONS 4,683.33 0.00 CHECK NO 593003 30000906 14248592 311370 SUPPLIES 30000906 14244206 311370 SUPPLIES 30000906 14248594 311370 SUPPLIES 30000906 14248593 311370 SUPPLIES 30000906 14244205 311370 SUPPLIES 30000906 14248595 311370 SUPPLIES VENDOR 182050 - TROPIC SUPPLY INC. 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 001.122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 4,683.34 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 115 VCHR NET 4.683.33 4.683.34 9.366.67 0.00 521.00 0.00 521.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 521.00 0.00 17.92 0.00 17.92 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17.92 0,00 150,00 0.00 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 0.00 136.44 0.00 136.44 0.00 499.68 0.00 499.68 0.00 23.62 0.00 23.62 0.00 44.76 0.00 44.76 0.00 19.30 0.00 19.30 0.00 58.00 0.00 58.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000906 30000906 30000906 DESCRIPTION 14239363 311370 SUPPLIES 14244207 311370 SUPPLIES 14248596 311370 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 52.56 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 52.56 38.25 0.00 38.25 93.19 0.00 93.19 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 965.80 116 CHECK NO 30001054 592924 PP#2 PP/~2 VENDOR 102380 - UNITED WAY 001-000000-217100-00000 0.00 513.01 0.00 513.01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 513.01 CHECK NO 30001081 30001081 30001081 30001081 593138 VENDOR 318860 - US BIOSYSTEMS, INC. 97925 310406 CHEMICALS 99828 310406 CHEMICALS 100017 310406 CHEMICALS 99862 310406 CHEMICALS 408-233350-634999-00000 0.00 408-233350-634999-00000 0.00 408-233350-634999-00000 0.00 408-233350-634999-00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 215.00 0.00 215.00 168.00 0.00 168.00 14.00 0.00 14.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 432.00 CHECK NO 30001073 30001073 30001073 30001073 30001073 593157 P2289650 8/28 311446 MAP/CHARTS P2247934 7/31 311446 MAP/CHARTS P2308390 9/25 311446 MAP/CHARTS P2317971 9/25 311446 MAP/CFIARTS P2271168 7/31 311446 MAP/CHARTS VENDOR 330340 - US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,FAA 495-192330-652940-00000 0.00 81.90 0.00 81.90 495-192330-652940-00000 0.00 495-192330-652940-00000 0.00 495-192330-652940-00000 0.00 495-192330-652940-00000 0.00 4.92 0.00 4.92 0.00 5.10 0.00 5.04 0.00 4.92 4.92 5.10 5.04 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 161 1 PAGE VOUCHER 30001073 30001073 DESCRIPTION P2259494 7/31 311446 MAP/CHARTS P2329512 9/25 311446 MAP/CHARTS ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 495-192330-652940-00000 0.00 495-192330-652940-00000 0.00 AMT NET 5.10 5.04 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 5.10 5.04 112.02 CHECK NO 430065 593298 VENDOR 900050 - US HOME/LENKAR REF 362069 LENNAR/US HOME 113-000000-115420-00000 REF 362069 LENNAR/ US HOME 0.00 3.13 0.00 3.13 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3.13 CHECK NO 593130 VENDOR 314680 - VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES 30000823 A2102151CJ 10/1-31 311803 - A2102151CJ 10/1-31 111-156310-641150-00000 111-156313-641150-00000 111-156341-641150-00000 111-156425-641150-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.80 5.90 40.40 2.95 0.00 62.05 30001091 A2005908CJ 10/1-31 310169 - A2005908CJ 10/1-31 408-253211-641150-00000 408-253221-641150-00000 0.00 0.00 2.95 17.10 0.00 20.05 30001092 A2117053CJ 10/1-31 311295 - A2117053CJ 10/1-31 001-144210-641150-00000 0.00 50.75 0.00 50.75 30001090 A2005371CJ 10/1-31 310592 - A2005371CJ 10/1-31 408-233350-641150-00000 0.00 23.07 0.00 23.07 30000823 A2102151C3 10/1-31 310939 - A2102151CJ 10/1-31 111-156343-641150-00000 111-156349-641150-00000 111-156380-641150-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.90 28.85 2.95 0.00 42.70 30000824 ~013996C3 10/1-31 311812 - A2013996CJ 10/1-31 408-210155-641150-00000 0.00 17.21 0.00 17.21 30000822 A2120464C3 10/1-31 311363 - A2120464CJ 10/1-31 001-122240-641150-00000 0.00 68.85 0,00 68.85 30001090 A2005371CJ 10/1-31 310169 - A2005371CJ 10/1-31 408-210105-641150-00000 408-210125-641150-00000 408-253211-641150-00000 408-253212-641150-00000 408-253250-641150-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.73 8.50 5.90 23.25 2.95 0.00 88.33 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001042 593214 PP#2 PP~2 VENDOR 357800 - VERMONT STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORP 001-000000-218900-00000 161 1 CHECK NO 30000895 592921 VENDOR 19260 - VICS SHOE REPAIR 906000057 109-182602-652110-00000 109-182901-652110-00000 310005 SAFETY BOOTS AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 430069 593299 VENDOR 900050 - VICTORIA L. BEDFORD REF PARKS V. BEDFORD 111-156380-347990-00000 REF PARKS V. BEDFORD PAGE 118 CHECK NO 30000949 593113 VENDOR 301500 - W.E. JOHNSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY 4276 470-173441-652990-00000 250377 VIDEO TAPE VCHR NET 373.01 CHECK NO 30000953 30000945 30000948 30000951 30000948 30000952 592929 1499878-0200186 10/02 1499878-0200186 10/02 311136 1495295/0197542 10/02 1495294/0197542 10/02 311729 8657878-191201 8/02 8657878-191201 8/02 1499673-0199575 10/02 1499673-0199575 10/02 310153 1487276-199546 9/1/02 1487276-199546 9/1/02 1602415-0199888 10/02 1602415-0199888 10/02 311208 VENDOR 109110 - WASTE MGMT OF COLLIER COUNTY 001-157110-643300-00000 495-192370-643300-00000 001-156110-643300-00000 521-122410-643300-00000 001-122240-643300-00000 495-192350-643300-00000 0.00 87.15 0.00 87.15 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 87.15 250.00 1,087.35 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,337.35 1,337.35 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 0.00 43.00 0.00 43.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 43.00 0.00 90.97 0.00 90.97 0.00 311.11 0.00 311.11 0.00 221.52 0.00 221.52 0.00 533.12 0.00 533.12 0.00 128.07 0.00 128.07 0.00 90.97 0.00 90.97 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 ACCOUNT NO ART DISC CHECK NO 30000943 593169 VENDOR 337370 CG210741 311361 CARPET WAYNE WILES FLOOR COVERINGS 001-122240-646110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000957 593066 VENDOR 261900 REF 363938 WCI COMM WCI COMM REF 363938 WCI COMMUNITIES LTD 113-000000-115420-00000 CHECK NO 30000959 592944 VENDOR 129350 WELLESLEY INN P51051-02 RM 124 9/9-13 R KUHNS 01-1812 WELLESLY INN 681-421190-634405-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000877 593158 VENDOR 332390 WENDY KLOPF 10/17 MBA LUNCH W.KLOPF 10/17 MBA LUNCH W. KLOPF 191-138785-654360-44200 0.00 CHECK NO 430074 593314 VENDOR 900140 WENDY POSTON WITNESS FEE-W POSTON WENDY POSTON WITNESS FEE 00-1216 681-421190-634405-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430072 593300 VENDOR 900050 WEST COAST GUARANTY TITLE INS CO OVPY 6521047/6623139 473-000000-115570-00000 WESTCOAST GUAR TITLE 6521047/6623139 ART NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30000954 592965 VENDOR 155480 V BOCK 02-10632 311478 V BOCK 02-10632 WESTCOAST VETERII~ARY CLINIC 610-155413-631970-00000 1,969.30 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 1,375.76 1,969.30 1,969.30 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 360.00 0.00 360.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 360.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.00 423.00 0.00 423.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 423.00 0.00 379.87 0.00 379.87 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 379.87 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30000956 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 593002 VENDOR 180010 - WHITE SANDS VETERINARY CLINIC 02-10551 J ORTIZ 610-155413-631970-00000 311477 J ORTIZ 02-10551 AMT DISC 161 CHECK NO 30000958 593109 VENDOR 297010 - WILSON MILLER INC REF 329617 WILSON MILLER WILSON MILLER REF 329617 113-138900-322430-00000 113-138900-323710-00000 113-138900-322420-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30000947 592922 VENDOR 193 9/02 310438 9/02 19690 - WIN-CAR 146-144380-652990-00000 CHECK NO 30001006 593194 VENDOR 347500 - WOODS HOLE GROUP 2044 REVISED 325-172984-631400-31011 325-172940-631400-51011 203233 7/1-31/02 PAGE 120 CHECK NO 30000865 593246 VENDOR 365470 - WWW.742STOREFRONT.COM, INC. 21494 470-173463-634999-00000 250373 HOSTING OF WEBSITE VCHR NET CHECK NO 30001108 593006 VENDOR 185880 - WYNDHAM HARBOUR ISLAND HOTEL CONF 322095 G YANDA 408-233350-640300-00000 251036 G YANDA 10/24-25/02 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 CHECK NO 30001107 593124 VENDOR 310510 - WYNDFL~M PALACE RESORT & SPA G CARTER 10/27-30/02 101-163609-640300-00000 250498 G CARTER 10/27-30/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,451.00 146.00- 37.00- 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,268.00 2.268.00 0.00 88.04 0.00 88.04 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 88.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,255.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,255.00 2,255.00 0.00 549.00 0.00 549.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 93.00 0.00 93.00 0.00 93.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 479.40 0.00 479.40 0.00 479.40 OCTOBER 23, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 22, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO ~ DISC CHECK NO 30000725 592986 VENDOR 166250 - XERISCAPE WATER SYSTEMS, INC. REF 361602 XERISCAPE 113-138900-322110-00000 REF 361602 XERISCAPE 161 1 CHECK NO 30000946 593144 VENDOR 321440 - XPEDX PAPER & GRAPHICS 650-N403460 001-156175-651110-00000 311019 PAPER AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 430073 593301 VENDOR 900050 - YAMILE ROMAQUERE REFUND PARKS Y ROMAQUERE 670-000000-220010-00000 ROMAQUERE REFUND PARKS VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 30000950 593262 VENDOR 365870 - ZEBEDEE HARRIS REIMB CLASS D LICENSE 408-253212-649010-00000 251138 REIMB CLASS D LICENSE PAGE 121 CHECK NO 30000880 593232 VENDOR 364850 - ZOCKLEIN & ASSOCIATES REGIST 1/9-10/3 K.WARD 001-121710-654360-00000 250958 REGIST 1/9-10/03 K.WARD VCHR NET 549.00 408 CHECKS WRITTEN 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 25.00 0.00 89.73 0.00 89.73 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 89.73 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 0.00 25.25 0.00 25.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.25 0.00 299.00 0.00 299.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 GRAND TOTAL 0.00 299.00 1,589,322.69 Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County, Florida Finance & Accounting Department 161 MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Re: 11/01//02 Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners Constance C. Murray, General Operations Manager Finance Department/Clerk to the Board Board of County Commissioners Disbursements Please find attached a listing of the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period October 26, 2002 through November 01, 2002. In accordance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1) I request that these reports be included as miscellaneous correspondence to the Board of County Commissioners and made part of the official records. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please telephone me at 774- 8481. Q:/Manual Checks/APMLOG BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A/P Manual Check Log DATE ISSUED TO: CK# AMOUNT 0/2412002 0/2412002 0/2412002 0~24~2002 0/2412002 0~25~2002 0~28~2002 0~28~2002 0~28~2002 0129/2002 0~29~2002 0~29~2002 0~29~2002 Tamara Lee Ludwig J. Abruzzo Michael F. Beal Abbas Ahrabi Asli Collier County Tax Collector Fred Coyle Shannon Brown Atlantis Computer Center, Inc. Big Island Builders Dept of Business & Professional Reg. DCA Cashier Dept. Of Community Affairs Check Run Beginning Check Run Ending 501 502 5O3 5O4 5O5 5O6 5O7 5O8 5O9 510 511 593315 593800 $81.40 81.40 4,509.00 125,614.80 156.57 500.00 120.00 4,999.05 6,339.10 24,604.26 23,570.44 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK NO 30001847 593752 VENDOR 366150 - FLORIDA CHILDREN'S FORUM REGIS 11/16/02 CARE SEMIN 111-156343-654360-00000 250183 REGIS 11/16/02 CARE SEMINAR 0.00 CHECK NO 30001842 593565 VENDOR 273240 - 21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY G.DESIR 9/6/02 001-155930-631210-00000 312024 G.DESIR 9/6/02 0.00 CHECK NO 30001555 30001555 30001555 30001492 593451 G02-1046 310459 PARTS G02-1072 310459 PARTS G02-1071 310459 PARTS G02-1042 311369 SVS VENDOR 161100 - AAA GENERATOR & PUMP INC. 408-233312-634999-00000 408-233312-634999-00000 408-233312-634999-00000 408-233313-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001466 593660 VENDOR 332540 - AAOHN MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION 76085 517-121640-654110-00000 251233 MHAMACHEK MBRSHP RENEWAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001803 593438 VENDOR 147860 - ABE SKINNER, PROPERTY APPRAISER 2001 NON-AD VALOREM ROLL 410-959050-930600-00000 312082 2001 NON-AD VALOREM TAX ROLL 0.00 CHECK NO 593643 VENDOR 325040 - ACE TOOL COMPANY 30001553 3320434-01 101-163624-652910-00000 206950 TOOLS 0.00 105.00 CHECK TOTAL 705.12 CHECK TOTAL 87.50 1,124.06 1,204.06 552.46 CHECK TOTAL 195.00 CHECK TOTAL 16,884.21 CHECK TOTAL 28.54 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 105.00 105.00 705.12 705.12 87.50 1,124.06 1,204.06 552.46 2,968.08 195.00 195.00 16,884.21 16,884.21 28.54 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001553 30001553 DESCRIPTION 3320434-00 206950 TOOLS 3320434-03 206950 TOOLS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163624-652910-00000 0.00 101-163624-652910-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001615 30001615 593513 CONF~i]006426102 D.DOMINGU 311722 C0NF#0006426102 D.DOMINGUEZ CONF#006525102 C. REYES 311722 C0NF#006525102 C.REYES VENDOR 228400 - ADAM'S MARK DAYTONA BEACH RESORT 101-163628-640300-00000 ~ NET VCHR DISC 2,062.03 O. O0 PAGE CHECK NO 30001573 VCHR NET 2,062.03 96.88 0.00 96.88 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,187.45 0.00 237.00 0.00 237.00 101-163628-640300-00000 0.00 593520 VENDOR 237550 - ADAMS TANK & LIFT INC. 95411 521-122450-646510-00000 251213 REPAIR 408-210151-634999-00000 381-120402-631401-80003 237.00 0.00 237.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 474.00 0.00 480.64 0.00 480.64 CHECK NO 593627 VENDOR 317580 - ADECCO 30001497 58957571 311559 TEMPS 381-120402-631401-80003 CHECK NO 593620 VENDOR 315350 - AEC NATIONAL 20045594 21010 203133 TO 9/30/02 20045594 21001 203133 TO 9/30/02 20045595 21002 5706 TO 9/30/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 480.64 CHECK NO 593637 30001638 21004 381-120402-631402-80196 0.00 438.80 0.00 438.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 438.80 39,078.00 0.00 99,708.00 0.00 4,698.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 260.00 VENDOR 320830 - AEC NATIONAL/WILKISON JOINT VENTURE 414-263611-631400-73060 412-273511-631400-70074 412-273512-631400-70074 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,078.00 99,708.00 4,698.00 143,484.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000935 DESCRIPTION 7239 TO 9/30/02 21009 106976 TO 9/30/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 414-263614-631400-73060 0.00 412-273511-631400-70077 0.00 409-287150-631400-70077 0.00 CHECK NO 593428 VENDOR 131010 - AFFORDABLE PETCARE CENTER 30001496 A DIRKEY 02-9976 610-155413-631970-00000 311567 A DIRKEY 02-9976 CHECK NO 593555 VENDOR 264920 - AIRBORNE EXPRESS 30001495 S9101750 001-155410-641950-00000 311555 SHIPG AMT NET VCHR DISC 295.00 0.00 CHECK NO 593605 VENDOR 300460 - AIRS 30001468 9/13 MBR#IBL1199 251173 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 001-156110-652630-00000 0.00 3,230.00 0.00 CHECK NO 593583 VENDOR 281770 - ALAN AND PATRICIA BOOLE 30001838 0CT-2002 001-106010-644100-00000 0CT-2002 312217 30001837 0CT-2002 001-106010-644100-00000 0CT-2002 312218 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 555.00 CHECK NO 30001469 593669 VENDOR 340640 - ALDO R. BERETTA, MD I FRAGOSA 9/9 001-155930-631210-00000 251241 I FRAGOSA 9/9 3.230.00 CHECK NO 30001563 593473 VENDOR 184390 - ALL STATE BIOGUARD SERVICES, INC. 43558 111-156313-634999-00000 311306 SVS 3,785. O0 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 65.00 0.00 20.84 0.00 20.84 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.84 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 250.00 2,018.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,163.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,018.80 2,163.00 4,181.80 0.00 71.50 0.00 71.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 71.50 0.00 26.00 0.00 26.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001498 593403 VENDOR 109450 - ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORPOPu~TION I0305711 408-233312-652310-00000 310714 BLEACH CHECK NO 593640 VENDOR 323290 - ALLTEL COMMUNIATIONS, INC. 30001685 VFB2BTV 10/15/02 470-173410-641700-00000 VFB2BTV 10/15/02 311681 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001742 593634 VENDOR 318980 - ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. VFB2BWH 10/15/02 VFB2BWH 10/15/02 311556 30001686 VFB2B6Z 10/15/02 VFB2B6Z 10/15/02 30001741 VFB2LM6 10/15/02 VFB2LM6 10/15/02 311051 30001684 VFB2B5V 10/15/02 VFB2B5V 10/15/02 30001681 VFB2CM7 10/15/02 VFB2CM7 10/15/02 310676 30001682 VFB2B64 10/15/02 VFB2B64 10/15/02 30001686 VFB2B6V 10/15/02 VFB2B6V 10/15/02 30001680 VFB2F86 10/15/02 VFB2F86 10/15/02 001-155410-641700-00000 114-178970-641700-00000 113-138312-641700-00000 30001743 VFB2B55 10/15/02 VFB2855 10/15/02 310994 408-210111-641700-00000 408-253211-641700-00000 408-253221-641700-00000 001-138710-634999-00000 001-155110-641700-00000 114-178970-641700-00000 30001686 VFB2B63 10/15/02 VFB2B63 10/15/02 198-157430-641900-00000 198-157440-641700-000D0 001-122310-641700-00000 114-178970-641700-00000 0.00 1,699.91 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 26.00 1,699.91 1,699.91 0.00 74.60 0.00 74.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 74.60 0.00 370.38 0.00 370.38 0.00 89.75 0.00 89.75 0.00 49.23 0.00 49.23 0.00 23.87 0.00 25.64 0.00 23.29 0.00 72.80 0.00 46.95 0.00 46.95 0.00 19.95 0.00 19.95 0.00 85.53 0.00 85.53 0.00 42.90 0.00 0.00 0,00 42.90 0.00 87.41 0.00 87.41 0.00 74.80 0.00 74.80 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001683 30001743 DESCRIPTION VFB2CNF 10/15/02 VFB2CNF 10/15/02 250414 VFB2B5X 10/15/02 VFB2B5X 10/15/02 310994 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122255-641700-00000 0.00 001-122310-641700-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001599 30001600 30001600 30001603 30001597 30001597 30001603 30001602 30001602 30001601 30001597 30001598 593326 VENDOR 550 - ALPHA OMEGA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 037986 310465 10/1/02-10/03/02 111-156313-646710-00000 23064A 310467 COPIES 111-156380-646710-00000 111-156380-651210-00000 038017 310467 9/9-10/9/02 111-156380-646710-00000 111-156380-651210-00000 23153A 311591 COPIES 113-138930-644600-00000 037905 310155 MAINT 10/02 408-210105-634999-00000 22929A 310155 COPIES 408-210105-634999-00000 038033 311591 10/10-11/10/02 113-138930-644600-00000 113-138930-651210-00000 113-138930-641950-00000 037843 311590 10/02 113-138915-644600-00000 113-138915-651210-00000 113-138915-641950-00000 23155A 311590 COPIES 113-138915-644600-00000 037813 310735 10/1/02-10/1/03 408-253211-634999-00000 037804 310155 MAINT 10/1/02-10/1/03 408-210105-634999-00000 037763 310463 9/28-10/28/02 111-156310-646710-00000 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 78.11 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 78.11 44.90 0.00 44.90 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,062.71 0.00 643.49 0.00 643.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.67 0.00 0.00 47.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.67 47.97 0.00 24.42 0.00 24.42 0.00 295.74 0.00 295.74 0.00 46.74 0.00 46.74 0.00 83.25 0.00 221.74 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 83.25 0.00 123.70 0.00 3.50 0.00 308.49 210.45 0.00 203.50 0.00 203.50 0.00 595.00 0.00 595.00 0.00 316.94 0.00 316.94 0.00 73.90 0.00 73.90 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001474 593638 VENDOR 322460 - ALTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. 1295231 521-122410-646415-00000 250008 INSPECTION 0.00 CHECK NO 30001564 593617 VENDOR 314200 - AMBIANCE AUDIO DESIGN & SECURITY 6668 408-210151-634999-00000 311636 MONITORING 0.00 CHECK NO 30001565 593597 VENDOR 295120 - AMERICAN LAFRANCE MEDICMASTER 12516 521-122410-646425-00000 310113 PARTS 0.00 CHECK NO 30001829 30001829 30001829 30001829 30001829 30001829 30001554 30001829 30001829 593629 P. SYBERT 9/3 P. SYBERT 9/3 G. COLE 9/13 G. COLE 9/13 S. BANTER 9/23 S. BANTER 9/23 B. DRILICH 9/17 B. DRILICH 9/17 D. BOSTICK 9/16 D. BOSTICK 9/16 M. OLEARY 5/4 M. OLEARY 5/4 37532 311324 10/02 SVS G. COLE 9/10 G. COLE 9/10 P. SYBERT 9/17 P. SYBERT 9/17 VENDOR 317980 - ANCHOR HEALTH CENTER 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 518-121630-631990-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 613.75 CHECK TOTAL 105.00 CHECK TOTAL 721.70 CHECK TOTAL 57.20 131.30 130.65 73.45 57.20 1,810.90 2,000.00 57.20 35.75 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 2.823.31 613.75 613.75 105.00 105.00 721.70 721.70 57.20 131.30 130.65 73.45 57.20 1.810.90 2,000,00 57.20 35.75 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001829 30001829 30001829 30001829 30001829 30001829 30001829 30001829 DESCRIPTION P. SYBERT 9/3 P. SYBERT 9/3 P. SYBERT 9/3 P. SYBERT 9/3 P. SYBERT 9/3 P. SYBERT 9/3 B. DRILICH 9/17 B. DRILICH 9/17 P. SYBERT 9/18 P. SYBERT 9/18 J. SIMMONS 8/21 J. SIMMONS 8/21 E. ANDERSON 9/18 E. ANDERSON 9/18 E. RUIZ 9/9 E. RUIZ 9/9 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430119 593776 VENDOR 900050 - ANGELINA NEWELL BOOK REFUND A. NEWELL 001-156110-347110-00000 BOOK REFUND A. NEWELL 161 1 CHECK NO 430099 593761 VENDOR 900030 - ANN SIMPSON 10/16-18/02 P/D A.SIMPSON 10/16-18/02 P/D A.SIMPSON 001-122240-654370-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 41.60 0.00 CHECK NO 593402 VENDOR 109240 - ANTONINO G. 7~AMPOGNA M.D. P.A. 30001583 D ANZUALDA 8/27/02 001-155930-631210-00000 251323 D ANZUALDA 8/27/02 PAGE CHECK NO 593677 VENDOR 343990 - AQUA PURE OF SW FLORIDA 30001476 R2924 001-144210-652990-00000 250346 RENTAL CFU~RGES VCHR NET 41.60 39.00 0.00 39.00 9.75 0.00 9.75 40.95 0.00 40.95 89.05 0.00 89.05 308.75 0.00 308.75 57.20 0.00 57.20 131.95 0.00 131.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,071.90 0.00 15.95 0.00 15.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.95 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 42.00 0.00 26.00 0.00 26.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 26.00 0.00 49.95 O.OO 49.95 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001562 593518 VENDOR 235890 - AQUASURE, INC. 20470 311428 SVS 001-122240-646284-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001804 593749 VENDOR 366050 - ARMANDO MORENO, ARMANDO MORENO JR., CLOSING PAR 168A 313-163673-761100-60018 312177 CLOSING PAR 168A 0.00 CHECK NO 30001557 30001558 30001557 30001557 30001557 30001557 30001557 593440 11-12:30 i 1/2 HOUR 11-12:30 i 1/2 HOUR M. BYSAINTHE 98-1399 M. BYSAINTHE 98-1399 10:30-11 1/2 HOUR 10:30-11 1/2 HOUR 8:30-10;30 2 HOURS 8:30-10:30 2 HOURS 8:30-1 4 1/2 HOUR 8:30-1 4 1/2 HOUR 8:30-12 1:30-3 5 HOURS 8:30-12 1:30-3 5 HOURS 1:30-2:30 2:30-31 1/2 HOU 1:30-2:30 2:30-3 i 1/2 HOUR VENDOR 148190 - ARSENE MASUSTE 681-421190-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001467 593575 VENDOR 278380 - ASCE/MEMBERSHIP 3361222 001-172970-654210-00000 250507 AMINOR MEMBERSHIP 0.00 CHECK NO 593642 VENDOR 323320 - AT & T AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 806.66 CHECK TOTAL 87,882.31 CHECK TOTAL 24.00 32.00 8.00 32.00 72. O0 80.00 24.00 CHECK TOTAL 210.00 CHECK TOTAL 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 49.95 806.66 806.66 87,882.31 87,882,31 24.00 32.00 8.00 32.00 72. O0 80.00 24.00 272.00 210.00 210.00 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001671 30001687 30001671 30001671 30001671 30001788 30001671 30001687 30001671 30001687 30001666 30001671 30001671 30001671 30001687 DESCRIPTION 0580658570001 9/25/02 0580658570001 9/25/02 0562827604001 10/13/02 0562827604001 10/13/02 0562875665001 9/15/02 0562875665001 9/15/02 7305115763001 9/21/02 7305115763001 9/21/02 0562849101001 9/25/02 0562849101001 9/25/02 730 511 5496 001 10/18 730 511 5496 001 10/18 0562826110001 9/13/02 0562826110001 9/13/02 0552810928001 10/13/02 0552810928001 10/13/02 7305115350001 9/18/02 7305115350001 9/18/02 7305115457001 10/18/02 7305115457001 10/18/02 0562826124001 10/13/02 0562826124001 10/13/02 0562860862001 9/21/02 0562860862001 9/21/02 7305112690001 9/27/02 7305112690001 9/27/02 0552810928001 9/13/02 0552810928001 9/13/02 0562826925001 10/13/02 0562826925001 10/13/02 CHECK NO 30001677 593519 VENDOR 236190 - AT&T 7305101276001 10/12/02 7305101276001 10/12/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-100110-641210-00000 0.00 198-157410-641900-00000 0.00 521-122410-641400-00000 0.00 490-144610-641900-00000 0.00 001-156160-641900-00000 0.00 001-156180-641210-00000 0.00 001-156160-641210-00000 0.00 470-173441-641900-00000 0.00 001-100510-641210-00000 0.00 001-100110-641210-00000 0.00 441-256110-641100-00000 0.00 495-192330-641900-00000 0.00 113-138936-641900-00000 0.00 470-173442-641900-00000 0.00 001-156170-641900-00000 0.00 001-156110-641900-00000 0.00 161 1 AMI NET VCHR DISC 61,24 O. O0 PAGE' VCHR NET 61.24 14.96 0.00 14.96 16.17 0.00 16.17 27.75 0.00 27.75 61.86 0.00 61.86 47.99 0.00 47.99 O. 13 O. O0 0.13 22.48 0,00 22.48 56.35 0.00 56.35 30.71 0.00 30.71 14.96 0.00 14.96 31.05 0.00 31.05 20.78 0.00 20.78 34.63 0.00 34.63 14.96 0.00 14.96 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 456.02 19.64 0.00 19.64 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001668 30001676 30001676 30001667 30001677 30001676 30001667 30001667 30001677 DESCRIPTION 020176053001 10/1/02 0200176053001 10/1/02 0303612379001 9/4/02 0303612379001 9/4/02 0207175083001 9/18/02 0207175083001 9/18/02 0300916198001 10/9/02 0300916198001 10/9/02 7305106293001 10/9/02 7305106293001 10/9/02 7305101276001 9/12/02 7305101276001 9/12/02 7305103638001 10/12/02 7305103638001 10/12/02 0207158348001 9/18/02 0207158348001 9/18/02 0303612379001 10/4/02 0303612379001 10/4/02 CHECK NO 30001675 30001673 30001675 30001672 30001673 30001674 593661 VENDOR 333620 - AT&T WIRELESS 10026082 10/5/02 10026082 10/5/02 10053654 9/13/02 10053654 9/13/02 200305 17254657 9/30/02 17254657 9/30/02 10053654 8/13/02 10053654 8/13/02 200305 10020908 9/21/02 10020908 9/21/02 200305 10100024 9/21/02 10100024 9/21/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO A~IT DISC 495-192350-641900-00000 0.00 470-173442-641210-00000 0.00 001-144210-641900-00000 0.00 408-253211-641100-00000 0.00 408-253212-641100-00000 0.00 001-156145-641900-00000 0.00 001-156110-641900-00000 0.00 408-253221-641100-00000 0.00 144-144360-641900-00000 0.00 470-173441-641210-00000 0.00 408-210130-641700-00000 0.00 146-144380-641700-00000 0.00 408-210130-641700-00000 0.00 146-144380-641900-00000 0.00 146-144380-641700-00000 0.00 001-144210-641700-00000 0.00 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 35.42 0.00 35.42 16.14 0.00 16.14 15.95 0.00 15.95 4.07 14.63 0.00 18.70 16.83 0.00 16.83 31.82 0.00 31.82 114.13 0.00 114.13 43.69 0.00 43.69 15.05 0.00 15.05 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 327.37 508.39 0.00 508.39 3.43 0.00 3.43 145.09 0.00 145.09 6.66 0.00 6.66 2.86 0.00 2.86 11.72 0.00 11.72 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001740 30001675 DESCRIPTION 10058439 10/5/02 10058439 10/5/02 311066 10026086 10/5/02 10026086 10/5/02 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-100010-641700-00000 0.00 408-210130-641700-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001815 593747 VENDOR 366030 - ATTORNEY TIM COTTER & D/P EFULTON40807280009 191-138785-884100-44200 40807280009 EFULTON 312376 0.00 CHECK NO 30001566 30001579 30001566 30001566 30001579 30001566 593604 VENDOR 300230 - AUTOLECTRIC 8265 311094 PARTS 8227 251214 PARTS 8254 311094 PARTS 8253 311094 PARTS 8232 251214 PARTS 8259 311094 PARTS 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 492.30 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 492.30 86.89 0.00 86.89 CHECK NO 30001409 593569 VENDOR 275370 - AWWA 2000207467 312096 MEMBERSHIP 408-210111-654210-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001475 30001580 593589 VENDOR 286720 - AZTEK COMMUNICATIONS 2353 114-178975-649990-00000 250922 WORK ORDER#49848 2405 312-163615-634999-00000 2,500.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,257.34 2.500.00 2,500.00 0.00 257.00 0.00 257.00 0.00 257.00 0.00 257.00 0.00 257.00 0.00 257.00 0.00 58.00 0.00 58.00 0.00 68.00 0.00 68.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 922.00 3.760.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,760.00 3,760.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30001582 30001477 30001589 30001581 250508 CAT RUNS 2343 251393 CAT RUN 2365 250291 COMPUTER RUNS 2354 251298 CAT RUN 2399 250905 SVS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163609-634999-00000 0.00 101-163612-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 001-155410-634999-00000 0.00 001-155910-649990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001507 30001507 30001507 30001507 593439 VENDOR 147980 - B & B TOWING 56824 310123 SUPPLIES 55733 310123 SUPPLIES 56823 310123 SUPPLIES 55541 310123 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001508 30001508 593655 VENDOR 331390 - B & B TOWING HH SERVICES INC. 2826 521-122410-646415-00000 310122 SUPPLIES 2310 521-122410-646415-00000 310122 SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001577 593427 VENDOR 129820 - B & W GOLF CARS, INC 10101 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-641950-00000 251221 PARTS 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 150.00 225.00 150.00 75.00 44.14 CHECK TOTAL 35.00 35.00 48.50 38.00 CHECK TOTAL 155.00 125.00 CHECK TOTAL 252.88 8.50 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 375.00 225.00 150.00 75.00 44.14 944.14 35.00 35.00 48.50 38.00 156.50 155.00 125.00 280.00 261.38 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 261.38 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK NO 593684 VENDOR 348520 - BADGER EQUIPMENT CO, 30001506 32994 310045 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 CHECK NO 30001731 593505 VENDOR 216420 - BANK OF AMERICA R. FL~RDY 00-1326 681-421190-634401-00000 R. HARDY 00-1326 VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 30001502 593725 VENDOR 362110 - BARBAPJ~ CACCHIONE PROF SVS 9/9-10/8 111-138317-634999-00000 206925 PROF SVS 9/9-10/8 0.00 72.61 0.00 72.61 CHECK NO 30001362 593517 VENDOR 232460 - BARRY'S BARBELL & EQUIPMENT 3013 518-121630-652990-00000 518-121630-641950-00000 251305 FITNESS SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 72.61 CHECK NO 30001504 30001504 593514 VENDOR 229220 - BERKSHIRE VETERINARY HOSPITAL L. DAVIDSON 02-10655 610-155413-631970-00000 L. DAVIDSON 02-10655 D. KIRK 02-10699 610-155413-631970-00000 D, KIRK 02-10699 0.00 11.09 0.00 11.09 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 11.09 CHECK NO 30001512 593564 VENDOR 272970 - BEST WESTERN 214291 R. KIPP 00-1216 681-421190-634405-00000 2,500.00 CHECK NO 30001381 593753 VENDOR 366170 - BEST WESTERN INN CON~823869 11/7-8 R.SMITH 114-178975-640310-00000 251283 CON~823869 11/7-8/02 R,SMITH CHECK TOTAL 958.00 32.50 0.00 2,500,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 990.50 0.00 59.00 0.00 59.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0,00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 990.50 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 593327 VENDOR 1820 - BETTER BUSINESS FORMS 30001514 3096750 113-138312-647110-00000 251239 ENVELOPES CHECK NO 30001511 593434 VENDOR 141230 - BIG CYPRESS ANIMAL CLINIC K. DAMPIER 02-10650 610-155413-631970-00000 311476 K. DAMPIER 02-10650 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 59.00 CHECK NO 30001510 593328 VENDOR 936880 250801 SUPPLIES 2310 - BOB DEAN SUPPLY, INC. 408-233312-655200-00000 0.00 373.50 0.00 373.50 CHECK NO 30001576 30001576 30001576 593429 CM124796 251220 P~hRTS 124796 251220 PARTS 124799 251220 PARTS VENDOR 133300 - BOB TAYLOR CHEVROLET 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 373.50 0.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.00 CHECK NO 30001712 593697 VENDOR 354720 - BODY WORKS CLAIM 136855 251485 CLAIM 136855 516-121650-645920-00000 0.00 103.20 0.00 103.20 CHECK NO 30001501 30001501 593461 VENDOR 168720 - BONITA AUTO SUPPLY/NAPA 626542 521-122410-646425-00000 310128 SUPPLIES 626543 521-122410-646425-00000 310128 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 103.20 210.95- 0.00 0.00 210.95- 0.00 21.55- 0.00 21.55- 0.00 171.47 0.00 171.47 0.00 805.00 0.00 805.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.72 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 805.00 0.00 50.72 0.00 50.72 0.00 210.95 0.00 210.95 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30001501 626599 310128 SUPPLIES 30001501 626598 310128 SUPPLIES 30001574 625075 251217 PARTS 30001501 626529 310128 SUPPLIES 30001501 626165 310128 SUPPLIES 30001574 625258 251217 PARTS 30001501 626451 310128 SUPPLIES 30001501 626686 310128 SUPPLIES 30001501 626438 310128 SUPPLIES 30001574 625444 251217 PARTS 30001501 626440 310128 SUPPLIES 30001501 626601 310128 SUPPLIES 30001578 625452 251215 PARTS 30001501 626360 310128 SUPPLIES 30001501 627287 310128 SUPPLIES 30001501 626264 310128 SUPPLIES 30001501 626026 310128 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 O.O0 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410~646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 46.15 0.00 1 PAGE 15 VCHR NET 46.15 53.55 0.00 53.55 22.19 0.00 22.19 35.36 0.00 35.36 6.50- 0.00 6.50- 42.45 0.00 42.45 34.03 0.00 34.03 131.89 0.00 131.89 6.79 0.00 6.79 83.77 0.00 83.77 14.06 0.00 14.06 28.76 0.00 28.76 14.46 0.00 14.46 16.00 0.00 16.00 49.09 0.00 49.09 351.46 0.00 351.46 74.46 0.00 74.46 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001574 625135 251217 PARTS 30001501 626772 310128 30001501 626520 310128 30001574 625344 251217 30001501 627403 310128 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PARTS SUPPLIES DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001515 593653 VENDOR 329590 - BONNESS INC 2967 250252 ASPHALT REPAIR 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001505 30001505 593476 VENDOR 187560 - BOOKS ON TAPE INC. 5035712P 001-156110-652670-00000 311751 BOOKS 5042450P 001-156110-652670-00000 311751 BOOKS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001655 593671 VENDOR 341560 - BRANDY BUTCHER TUIT.REIMB.B.BUTCHER 490-144610-654310-00000 TUITION REIMB.BRANDY BUTCHER 0.00 CHECK NO 30001516 593723 VENDOR 361550 - BRIEFINGS PUBLISHING GROUP 5574332 001-156175-641950-00000 251396 POSTAGE 0.00 CHECK NO 593442 VENDOR 151240 - BSN 161 AMT NET 69.76 15.20 244.88 74.46 69.52 CHECK TOTAL 546.98 CHECK TOTAL 289.60 211.20 CHECK TOTAL 459.05 CHECK TOTAL 5.00 CHECK TOTAL 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 69.76 15.20 244.88 74.46 69.52 1,621.71 546.98 546.98 289.60 211.20 500.80 459.05 459.05 5.00 5.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30001513 91013979 250162 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156381-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001575 593598 VENDOR 295300 - BUMPER TO BUMPER I293353 251219 PARTS 30001575 I293427 251219 PARTS 30001575 I293212 251219 PARTS 30001575 I293398 251219 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 210.40 0.00 PAGE 17 CHECK NO 593606 VENDOR 302850 - C&H DISTRIBUTORS INC 30001358 450666501 111-156381-652990-00000 250163 CIGARETTE RECEPTACLE VCHR NET 210.40 CHECK NO 30001361 593479 VENDOR 193260 - CALYPSO CAR WASH 010023/010024 521-122410-646415-00000 310109 LUBE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 210.40 CHECK NO 30001824 30001823 30001824 30001824 30001824 593329 VENDOR 91375 251392 PARTS 91269 251222 PARTS 91321 251392 PARTS 91224 251392 PARTS 91320 251392 PARTS 2860 - CAPRI LAWN & GARDEN EQUIP 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 23.96 0.00 23.96 0.00 65.48 0.00 65.48 0.00 192.13 0.00 192.13 0.00 16.68 0.00 16.68 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 298.25 0.00 130.38 0.00 130.38 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 130.38 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.00 0.00 606.76 0.00 606.76 0.00 19.86 0.00 19.86 0.00 61.49 0.00 61.49 0.00 9.48 0.00 9.48 0.00 196.10 0.00 196.10 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001824 30001823 DESCRIPTION 91329 251392 PARTS 91258 251222 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001822 593530 VENDOR 247990 CARDIAC SURGICAL ASSOCIATES E ROBERTS 6/25 001-155930-634101-00000 312182 E ROBERTS MEDICAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001542 593666 VENDOR 338350 CAROLINA SOFTWARE 21563 470-173435-634999-00000 312149 WASTEWORKS SOFTWARE SUPPORT 161 1 CHECK NO 30001482 593491 VENDOR 201920 CARTER FENCE COMPANY INC. 2002091344 CARTER FENCE 113-138900-322110-00000 2002091344 CARTER FENCE CO, INC ~ NET VCHR DISC 34.43 0.00 CHECK NO 30001537 593478 VENDOR 190350 CDW COMPUTER CENTER INC. GV81548 522-122464-764900-00000 207520 COMPUTER SUPPLIES VCHR NET 34.43 CHECK NO 30001549 593330 VENDOR 3050 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 711916 111-156332-646381-00000 250554 TRAX PATCHING COMPOUND 104.19 0.00 104.19 CHECK NO 30001548 593587 VENDOR 283030 91632770 250484 TONER CHARRETTE CORPORATION 111-138313-651110-00000 111-138313-641950-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,180.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,032.31 5,180.50 5,180.50 0.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 450.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 2,310,11 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,310.11 2,310.11 0.00 494.40 0.00 494.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 494.40 0.00 807.00 0.00 8.82 0.00 815.82 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 815.82 18 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 593437 VENDOR 146710 - CHRISTINE FORSZPANIAK M.D. 30001546 E PREYSS 9/11 251242 E PREYSS 001-155930-631210-00000 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 430137 593769 VENDOR 900040 - CHRISTOPHER MARSALA 04317942701 408-000000-115001-00000 9301 TROON LAKES DR PAGE CHECK NO 30001541 30001541 30001816 30001541 593331 VENDOR 3360 - CITY OF EVERGLADES 338 495-192350-643400-00000 312155 WATER/SEWER SVS 339 495-192350-643400-00000 312155 WATER/SEWER SVS 313 9/25 001-106010-643400-00000 313 9/25 337 495-192350-643400-00000 312155 WATER/SEWER SVS VCHR NET 0.00 52.00 0.00 52.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001836 30001832 593516 VENDOR 232440 - CITY OF NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY 0CT-2002 COLL13 001-106010-644100-00000 0CT-2002 312214 0CT-2002 COLL13 001-106010-644100-00000 0CT-2002 312213 52.00 0.00 38.62 0.00 38.62 CHECK NO 30001349 593679 VENDOR 344750 - CLARA E BERON 10/3/02 8-12 10/3/02 8-12 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001545 593407 4215 250255 VENDOR 111750 - CLARK'S NURSERY 408-233351-646314-00000 LIGUSTRUM CHECK TOTAL 38.62 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 64.00 0.00 64.00 0.00 595.05 0.00 595.05 0.00 305.30 0.00 305.30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 187.06 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 900.35 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 64.00 0.00 86.43 0.00 86.43 0.00 21.40 0.00 21.40 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 44.23 0.00 44.23 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001212 30001212 30001212 30001212 30001212 30001212 30001212 30001212 30001212 30001212 30001212 593458 2810150 311858 28101505 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC 2814568 311858 28145685 COPIES.RECORDING,ETC 2806499 311858 28064995 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC 2811534 311858 28115345 COPIES,RECORDING.ETC 2770375 311858 27703755 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC 2814565 311858 28145655 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC 2814566 311858 28145665 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC 2814567 311858 28145675 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC 2806498 311858 28064985 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC 2806496 311858 28064965 COPIES,RECORDING ETC 2809998 311858 28099985 COPIES.RECORDING ETC VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 001-454010-647110-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 001-454010-647110-00000 0.00 001-454010-647110-00000 0.00 001-454010-647110-00000 0.00 001-454010-647110-00000 0.00 001-454010-647110-00000 0.00 001-454010-647110-00000 0.00 001-454010-647110-00000 0.00 001-454010-647110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001821 001-454010-647110-00000 0.00 6.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001357 001-454010-647110-00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 593610 VENDOR 305220 - CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA T.CAMPBELL 8/19/02 001-155930-631210-00000 312032 T.CAMPBELL 8/19/02 593432 VENDOR 136290 - CLIPPING BUREAU OF FLORIDA 105610 111-100130-634999-00000 250696 CLIPPING SERVCES PAGE 20 VCHR NET 300.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 5.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 5.00 4.00 6.00 5.00 2.00 2.00 5.00 40.00 0.00 156.83 0.00 156.83 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 52.00 0.00 52.00 0.00 52.00 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001480 593612 VENDOR 310880 - CLUB CAR 933209 2036976 GOLF CART 301-120435-762200-52001 0.00 CHECK NO 30001540 30001366 593332 VENDOR 3570 - COASTAL COURIER 3818 001-100010-641950-00000 311037 COURIER SVS 4145 001-106010-643400-00000 INV4145 COURIER SVS AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001539 593672 VENDOR 342160 - COASTAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH FOUNDA 2003 SUB RENEWAL 111-178980-654110-00000 251388 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 4.814.40 0.00 CHECK NO 30001536 30001536 593713 25938 206978 25937 206978 VENDOR 359320 - COLEMAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 301-120435-763100-52525 301-120435-763100-52525 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 CHECK NO 30001820 30001820 30001820 30001820 593498 J MOFFATT 6/27 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES D ANZUALDA 8/30 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES T VANWINKLE 9/3 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES T VANWINKLE 9/3 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES VENDOR 205190 - COLLIER ANESTHESIA P.A. 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 PAGE 21 VCHR NET 156.83 4,814.40 4,814.40 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 76.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 155.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 3,389.80 0.00 1,098.18 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,389.80 1,098.18 4,487.98 0.00 144.95 0.00 144.95 0.00 277.55 0.00 277.55 0.00 390.00 0.00 390.00 0.00 585.00 0.00 585.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001820 30001820 30001820 30001820 30001820 30001820 30001820 30001820 30001820 DESCRIPTION D CRUISE 1/29 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES D ACOSTA 9/3 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES A THOM 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES 0 TURNER 9/3 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES T VANWINKLE 9/5 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES M SIMONISE 8/26 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES V HALL 8/21 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES E ROBERTS 6/25 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES J HOUSE 8/09 312033 MEDICAL SERVICES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001470 593475 VENDOR 187320 - COLLIER CAT HOSPITAL 02-10646 PMORRIS 610-155413-631970-00000 311575 PMORRIS ANIMAL FEES CHECK NO 30001812 30001812 593393 VENDOR 100430 - COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AIRMEC2325 311906 001-144510-646860-00000 AIRMEC26 311906 001-144510-646860-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 156.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 156.00 277.55 0.00 277.55 234.00 0.00 234.00 273.00 0.00 273.00 277.55 0.00 277.55 936.00 0.00 936.00 277.55 0.00 277.55 2.691.00 0.00 2,691.00 585.00 0.00 585.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7,105.15 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 2,652.51 0.00 4,685.98 0.00 2. 652.51 4,685.98 CHECK NO 30001785 593317 VENDOR 20030005 AND 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 521-122410-649010-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7.338.49 0.00 52.85 0.00 52.85 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001786 593318 VENDOR 20030004 AND 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 521-122410-649010-00000 161 CHECK NO 30001805 593319 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR CLOSING PAR 168A 313-163673-649050-60018 AND AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001369 593316 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20030100 TAGS/TITLES 521-122410-649010-00000 AND 1 CHECK NO 30001538 30001364 30001353 30001353 30001352 30001828 30001356 30001356 30001352 593334 VENDOR 0570173380 9/16 - 10/16 0570173380 9/16 - 10/16 03918623200 9/3 03918623200 9/3 04602512600 9/5-10/3 04602512600 9/5-10/3 04614614700 9/5-10/3 04614614700 9/5-10/3 04800002700 9/9-10/7 04800002700 9/9-10/7 07801284200 8/21 - 9/24 07801284200 8/21 - 9/24 06910223500 8/20-9/23 06910223500 8/20-9/23 07202279700 9/24 07202279700 9/24 04810397300 9/9-10/7 04810397300 9/9-10/7 3690 - COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY BILLING 408-253212-643400-00000 408-233351-643400-00000 408-233351-643400-00000 408-233351-643400-00000 111-156332~643400-00000 144-144360-643400-00000 521-122410-643400-00000 408-233352-643400-00000 111-156332-643400-00000 PAGE VCHR NET 52.85 0.00 52.85 0.00 52.85 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 52.85 0.00 417.69 0.00 417.69 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 417.69 0.00 21.60 0.00 21.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.60 0.00 233.58 0.00 233.58 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 33.00 0.00 33.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 30.60 0.00 30.60 0.00 36.48 0.00 36.48 0.00 6.72 0.00 6.72 0.00 402.96 0.00 402.96 0.00 93.60 0.00 93.60 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001817 30001354 30001352 30001817 30001353 30001353 30001352 30001817 30001544 30001353 30001353 30001352 30001544 30001605 30001352 DESCRIPTION 05726214000 9/13 - 10/11 05726214000 9/13 - 10/11 06102282300 8/15 - 9/18 06102282300 8/15 - 9/18 04802003100 9/10-10/7 04802003100 9/10-10/7 05702185200 9/19 - 10/11 05702185200 9/19 - 10/11 04717634900 9/6-10/4 04717634900 9/6-10/4 04500642900 9/6-10/7 04500642900 9/6-10/7 04803311500 9/10-10/8 04803311500 9/10-10/8 05426214200 9/11-10/10 05426214200 9/11 - 10/10 04500046000 9/5 - 10/4 04500046000 9/5-10/4 04900602901 9/9-10/7 04900602901 9/9-10/7 04502681700 9/16-10/14 04502681700 9/16-10/14 04833302500 9/10-10/8 04833302500 9/10-10/8 03918623200 9/3 - 10/2 03918623200 9/3-10/2 0481763500 9/10 - 10/7 0481763500 9/10 - 10/7 04810397400 9/9-10/7 04810397400 9/9-10/7 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233351-643400-00000 0.00 001-106010-643400-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 408-233351-643400-00000 0.00 408-233351-643400-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 408-233351-643400-00000 0.00 408-233351-643400-00000 0.00 408-233351-643400-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 408-233351-643400-00000 0.00 408-233351-643400-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001550 593596 VENDOR 292660 - COLLIER CUSTOM GLASS 6958 001-122240-652910-00000 250435 PIVOT KIT 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 12.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 12. O0 167.89 0.00 167.89 200.52 0.00 200.52 12.00 0.00 12.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 227.40 0.00 227.40 76.32 0.00 76.32 40.20 0.00 40.20 26.40 0.00 26.40 115.29 0.00 115.29 720.22 0.00 720.22 249.60 0.00 249.60 12.00 0.00 12.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 1.44 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 1.44 2,746.22 0.00 85.00 0.00 85.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001819 30001819 30001819 30001819 593595 VENDOR 291770 - COLLIER NEUROLOGIC SPECIALISTS D.MARTINEZ 9/24/02 312045 D.MARTINEZ 9/24/02 001-155930-631210-00000 S.SWEENEY 4/9/02 312045 S.SWEENEY 4/9/02 001-155930-631210-00000 C,DAVIS 9/17/02 312045 C,DAVIS 9/17/02 001-155930-631210-00000 P.STEWART 9/13/02 312045 P.STEWART 9/13/02 001-155930-631210-00000 161 1 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 VCHR NET 85.00 CHECK NO 30001818 593441 VENDOR 150010 - COLLIER SURGERY CENTER D BOSTICK 9/17 001-155930-634101-00000 312046 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE 0.00 71.50 0.00 71.50 CHECK NO 30001360 30001360 30001360 30001360 30001360 30001360 30001360 30001811 593721 003716 310132 SUPPLIES 003677 310132 SUPPLIES 003666 310132 SUPPLIES 003664 310132 SUPPLIES 003676 310132 SUPPLIES 003515 310132 SUPPLIES 003510 310132 SUPPLIES 003721 311197 PARTS VENDOR 360920 - COLLIER TIRE COMMERCIAL CENTER 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 178.75 0.00 178.75 0.00 48.75 0.00 48.75 0.00 32.50 0.00 32,50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 331.50 7,243.87 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 7,243.87 7,243.87 0.00 91.75 0.00 91.75 0.00 63,00 0,00 63.00 0.00 38.25 0.00 38.25 0.00 38.25 0.00 38.25 0.00 95.50 0.00 95.50 0.00 40.50 0.00 40.50 0.00 8.50 0.00 8.50 0.00 83.00 0.00 83.00 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001360 003758 310132 30001360 003812 310132 30001811 003741 311197 30001811 003709 311197 30001360 003578 310132 30001360 003590 310132 30001811 003712 311197 30001360 003647 310132 30001360 003771 310132 DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PARTS PARTS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PARTS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0,00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001826 593740 VENDOR 365760 - COMMERCE TITLE & FELIX BORGES D/P FBORGES 35645520004 191-138785-884100-44200 35645520004 FBORGES 312124 0.00 CHECK NO 30001363 436894 251268 MICROPHONE 30001359 437073 251033 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 593552 VENDOR 263070 - COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 126-138333-634999-35020 188-140480-649990-00000 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 63.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001543 593503 VENDOR 214920 - COMPUTER DISCOUNT WAREHOUSE GY06468 495-192310-651950-00000 250768 PALM M515 1 PAGE VCHR NET 63.00 38.25 0.00 38.25 1,121.73 0.00 1.121.73 122.82 0.00 122.82 157.50 0.00 157.50 63.00 0.00 63.00 208.56 0.00 208.56 85.50 0.00 85.50 38.25 0.00 38.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.357.36 2,500.00 2,500. O0 0.00 335.32 0.00 335.32 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 146.22 0.00 71.22 0.00 71.22 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 430136 593777 VENDOR 900050 - CONOTEL, LC 366290 CONOTEL, LC 366290 CONOTEL, LC 113-000000-115420-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001547 593738 VENDOR 365680 - CONTINENTAL MARKETING GROUP 188862 470-173410-651110-00000 250365 RUBBER STAMPS 0.00 CHECK NO 30001481 593335 VENDOR 126427 310110 COPIES 3800 - COPY CONCEPTS 521-122410-646710-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001839 593325 VENDOR 325820 - CORPORATE BENEFIT SERVICES 11/2002 ADMIN FEES 517-121640-631153-00000 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 30001343 30001606 30001342 30001345 30001606 311187 593572 36792346 311000 SUPPLIES 36506693 310857 SUPPLIES 36862909 310999 SUPPLIES 3664696 310504 SUPPLIES 36170499 310857 SUPPLIES 36862897 311187 SUPPLIES VENDOR 276650 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 101-163612-651110-00000 312-163615-651110-00000 001-122310-651110-00000 130-157710-651110-00000 312-163615-651110-00000 518-121630-651110-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 61.20 CHECK TOTAL 81.52 CHECK TOTAL 27,755.77 CHECK TOTAL 38.73 3.99- 161.40 22.85- 97.97- 80.70 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 IPAGE VCHR NET 335.32 50.00 50.00 61.20 61.20 81.52 81.52 27,755.77 27,755.77 38.73 3.99- 161.40 22.85- 97.97- 80.70 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001344 30001348 30001472 30001344 30001347 30001606 30001606 30001347 30001344 30001347 30001606 30001346 30001344 30001367 DESCRIPTION 36792307 311034 SUPPLIES 36824310 310946 SUPPLIES 36825742 310025 SUPPLIES 36707051 311034 SUPPLIES 36014156 310378 SUPPLIES 36198489 310857 SUPPLIES 36505345 310857 SUPPLIES 35982491 310378 SUPPLIES 36702219 311034 SUPPLIES 35982490 310378 SUPPLIES 36505343 310857 SUPPLIES 36505304 310673 SUPPLIES 36862899 311034 SUPPLIES 3664311 310015 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 30001355 593538 VENDOR 254990 - CPCU SOCIETY J WALKER 9/30 251032 MEMBERSHIP 3 WALKER 9/30 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 113-138312-651110-00000 0.00 111-138318-651110-00000 0.00 109-182900-651110-00000 0.00 113-138312-651110-00000 0.00 408-233351-651110-00000 0.00 312-163615-651110-00000 0.00 312-163615-651110-00000 0.00 408-233351-651110-00000 0.00 113-138312-651110-00000 0.00 408-233351-651110-00000 0.00 312-163615-651110-00000 0.00 001-138710-651110-00000 0.00 113-138312-651110-00000 0.00 111-138317-651110-00000 0.00 516-121650-654110-00000 0.00 AMT NET 3.31 104.04 53.67 168.97 622.55 8.82- 89.54 80.32 344.23- 421.64 41.53 4.90 53.12 258.88 CHECK TOTAL 140.00 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 3.31 104.04 53.67 168.97 622.55 8.82- 89.54 80.32 344.23- 421.64 41.53 4.90 53.12 258.88 1. 705.44 140.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 140.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001831 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 593592VENDOR 288320 - CPOC REALTY, L.L.C. OCT-2002 1905-145-CU HUI 001-138710-644100-00000 121-138755-644100-34500 191-138785-644100-44200 0CT-2002 312165 AHT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 30001473 593651 VENDOR 328250 - CREDIT DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 331672 001-157110-634999-00000 311146 CREDIT REPORTS 1,627.90 1,675.00 1,412.83 CHECK NO 30001471 30001471 30001471 30001471 30001471 593507 02-10512 T BLATECKY 311576 ANIMAL FEES 02-10544 E LANGFORD 311576 ANIMAL FEES 02-10550 E LANGFORD 311576 ANIMAL FEES 02-10511T BLATECKY 311576 ANIMAL FEES 02-10766 S KOZLOW 311576 ANIMAL FEES VENDOR 222430 - CROSSROADS VETERINARY CLINIC 610-155413-631970-00000 610-155413-631970-00000 610-155413-631970-00000 610-155413-631970-00000 610-155413-631970-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,715.73 0.00 4,715.73 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 30001351 593701 VENDOR 355610 - CRS TECHNOLOGY 47477 408-210105-634999-00000 250781 REPAIR 0.00 110.00 0.00 110.00 CHECK NO 301847 593770 VENDOR 900040 - CURTIS & JOCELYN WIMBERLY 06302509102 C WIMBERLY 408-000000-115001-00000 C WIMBERLY 2881 RIVERVIEW DR 0.00 17.24 0.00 17.24 CHECK NO 593716 VENDOR 359750 - D-PRO, INC 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 315.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 110.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17.24 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 144.00 0.00 144.00 0.00 144.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001485 30001486 DESCRIPTION 24/25/33 206197 PROJECT MGMT 24/25/32 206196 PROJECT MGMT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 411-273511-631400-70075 0.00 412-273511-631400-70066 0.00 412-273512-631400-70066 0.00 CHECK NO 30001406 30001406 30001406 30001406 30001406 30001406 30001406 30001406 30001406 30001406 30001406 30001406 30001406 593699 2002090178 2002090178 2002090611 2002090611 2002090401 2002090401 2002090400 2002090400 2002090406 2002090406 2002090408 2002090408 2002090314 2002090314 2002090397 2002090397 2002080551 2002080551 2002090114 2002090114 2002081007 2002081007 2002090399 2002090399 2002090387 2002090387 VENDOR 354820 - DAN'S YARD AND TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 111-138911-634804-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 2,100.00 0.00 0.00 1,050.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 2,100.00 1,050.00 3,150.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 4,900.00 0.00 0.00 4,900.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001406 2002100115 2002100115 30001406 2002080324 2002080324 30001406 2002090181 2002090181 30001406 2002080017 2002080017 DESCRIPTION DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR DAN'S YARD/TRACTOR COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-138911-634804-00000 0.00 111-138911-634804-00000 0.00 111-138911-634804-00000 0.00 111-138911-634804-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001849 593582 VENDOR 281390 - DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC 09677 414-263611-763100-73922 414-263614-763100-73922 205052 TAC PACK & INST. 161 CHECK NO 30001373 593635 VENDOR 319000 - DAVE WEST 2908 251177 LETHAL YELLOW DISEASE 001-157110-649990-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 55.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001706 593467 VENDOR 174930 - DAVID B FOX 10/-10/27/02 KARATE 310697 KARATE INSTR. 111-156380-634999-00000 1 CHECK NO 30001236 593728 VENDOR 364040 - DAVID L. COOK AND LISA DARBY COOK EASEMENT COSTS 207408 100.00 FOR 49 DAYS 325-172972-761200-31212 325-172977-761200-31107 325-172940-761200-51212 325-172940-761200-51107 PAGE CHECK NO 30001487 593658 VENDOR 331700 - DAWN RAGONE PE1-FY CASH PETTY CASH 001-121810-654360-00000 001-121810-652210-00000 VCHR NET 55.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 780.00 0.00 780.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,044.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,720.00 22,044.00 22,044.00 0.00 376.75 O.O0 376.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 376.75 0.00 611.00 0.00 611.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 611.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,300.00 0.00 600.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 29.97 0.00 8.98 0.00 4.900.00 4,900.00 38.95 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001376 30001200 593480 VENDOR 193310 - DEHART ALARM SYSTEMS. INC. 14778 311016 ANN.MONITORING 001-156363-646970-00000 14476 311016 ANNUAL MONITORING 111-156332-634999-00000 111-156334-634999-00000 001-156363-634999-00000 111-156332-646970-00000 111-156334-646970-00000 001-156363-646970-00000 161 1 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 30001552 30001552 30000376 593659 VENDOR 332420 - DELL COMPUTER CORP 122798235 311181 DESKTOP COMP. 001-122310-764900-00000 122789036 311181 DESKTOP COMP. 001-122310-764900-00000 115928948 207410 LATITUDE 101-163612-764900-00000 VCHR DISC 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 38.95 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 3,312.00 0.00 1,008.00 0.00 864.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.244.00 0.00 1,491.00 0.00 2,222.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,184.00 5,214.00 2,244.00 1,491.00 2,222.00 CHECK NO 30001620 30001797 30001623 593649 VENDOR 327060 - DENISE KIRK 10/6-8/02 P/D D.KIRK 10/6-8/02 P/D D.KIRK 10/18 P/D D.KIRK 10/18/02 P/D D.KIRK 10/3-4/02 P/D D.KIRK 10/3-4/02 P/D D.KIRK 470-173410-640300-00000 470-173463-640300-00000 470-173463-640300-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,957.00 0.00 36.00 0.00 36.00 0.00 6.00 O.OO 6.00 0.00 21.00 0.00 21.00 CHECK NO 30001707 593702 VENDOR 355770 - DENISE YAKIMO 10/1-10/27/02 SKATING 310699 SKATING INSTR. 111-156380-634999-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 63.00 0.00 429.00 0.00 429.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 429.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001854 DESCRIPTION 593759 VENDOR 366360 - DENNIS MC GEE 11/2-8/02 P/D D.MCGEE 11/2-8/02 P/D D. MCGEE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 412-273512-640300-70124 0,00 CHECK NO 30001656 30001790 30001705 30001404 30001656 593450 VENDOR 160920 - DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES 33-4361 UTIL/FRANCH.8/02 32-4361UTIL/FRANCHISE REG.8/02 669-100220-641900-00000 0.00 32-4419 P&R 9/02 33-4419 P&R 111-156395-641900-00000 0.00 32-4427 PARK&REC 9/02 3J-4427 P&R 9/02 111-156341-641900-00000 0.00 33-4364 FAC. 8/02 33-4364 8/02 FAC. 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 33-4423 UTIL/FRANCH.9/02 32-4423 UTIL/FRANCHISE REG.9/02 669-100220-641900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001464 593471 VENDOR 181410 - DEPARTMENT OF STATE OO-LSTA-E-02 FY02 INT 129-000000-208400-00000 O0-LSTA-E-02 FY02 INTEREST 0.00 CHECK NO 30001654 30001654 30001654 30001654 30001654 593337 VENDOR 5240 - DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, INC. R.MOONEY 8/15/02 312049 R.MOONEY 8/15/02 001-155930-631990-00000 I.BATALLAN 9/4/02 312049 I.BATALLAN 9/4/02 001-155930-631990-00000 D.BONETA 7/5/02 312049 D.BONETA 7/5/02 001-155930-631990-00000 2M.GARRETT 7/12/02 312049 3M.GARRETT 7/12/02 001-155930-631990-00000 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 126.00 0.00 126.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 126.00 50.62 0.00 50.62 154.43 0.00 154.43 23.64 0.00 23.64 235.50 0.00 235.50 50.93 0.00 50.93 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 515.12 1,308.42 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,308.42 1,308.42 0.00 23.40 0.00 23,40 0.00 26.33 0.00 26.33 0.00 201.50 0.00 201.50 0.00 25.03 0.00 25.03 MA.MURRAY 7/2/02 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 63.38 0.00 63.38 312049 MA.MURRAY 7/2/02 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001654 30001654 30001654 30001654 30001654 30001654 30001654 30001654 30001654 30001654 30001654 DESCRIPTION B.PROGANSKY 6/6/02 312049 B.PROGANSKY 6/6/02 I.BATALLAN 9/4/02 312049 I.BATALLAN 9/4/02 S.NIESEN 9/11/02 312049 S.NIESEN 9/11/02 R.MOONEY 8/15/02 312049 R.MOONEY 8/15/02 D.ANZUALDA 7/31/02 312049 D.ANZUALDA 7/31/02 D.BONETA 9/4/02 312049 D.BONETA 9/4/02 B.PROGANSKY 6/6/02 312049 B.PROGANSKY 6/6/02 D.CHARLES 9/6/02 312049 D.CHARLES 9/6/02 S.NIESEN 9/11/02 312049 S.NIESEN 9/11/02 A.NOWAK 9/11/02 312049 A.NOWAK 9/11/02 E.HINOJOSA 8/28/02 312049 E.HINOJOSA 8/28/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO ANT DISC 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 119.60 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 119.60 122.20 0.00 122.20 118.30 0.00 118.30 132.60 0.00 132.60 45.18 0.00 45.18 141.70 0.00 141.70 31.20 0.00 31.20 127.08 0.00 127.08 10.73 0.00 10.73 25.03 0.00 25.03 129.35 0.00 129.35 CHECK NO 430132 593762 VENDOR 900030 - DIANE FLAGG 10/6-10/02 TRVL D.FLAGG 10/6-10/02 TRVL D.FLAGG 491-144611-640300-33417 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,342.61 93.00 0.00 93.00 CHECK NO 430100 593778 VENDOR 900050 - DIANNE DISTLER REF.PARKS D.DISTLER 111-156380-347990-00000 REF.PARKS D.DISTLER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 93.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 CHECK NO 593678 VENDOR 344400 - DIRTY BILLY'S SUTLERY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001374 DESCRIPTION HATS FOR MILITARY EXHIBIT 250837 HATS FOR MILITARY EXHIBIT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 198-157410-652960-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001783 30001783 30001783 30001783 593714 VENDOR 359610 - DIVERSIFIED DRILLING 15432 310221 MAINT.OF WELLS 15434 310221MAINT.OF WELLS 15430 310221 MAINT.OF WELLS 15433 310221 MAINT.OF WELLS 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001214 593338 VENDOR 5270 - DOMESTIC CUSTOM METALS 12035 001-122240-652989-00000 250342 STEEL SHEET 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 458. O0 O. O0 CHECK NO 30001665 30001781 30001782 30001781 593396 VENDOR 104885 - DON HUNTER, SHERIFF 9/27-9/30/02 SEPT.CLAIM 9 9/27-9/30/02 SEPT.CLAIM 9 110-182800-634999-00000 OCT-02 CLAIM 10 SEPT 2002 CLAIM 10 199-611040-651110-00000 199-611040-652910-00000 199-611040-654110-00000 199-611040-654360-00000 199-611040-764990-00000 OCT-02 CLAIM 10-02 SEPT 2002 CLAIM 10-02 199-611040-640380-00000 199-611040-641100-00000 OCT-02 CLAIM 10 199-611040-512100-00000 199-611040-514100-00000 199-611040-521100-00000 199-611040-522100-00000 199-611040-523150-00000 199-611040-523160-00000 PAGE VCHR NET 458.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 458.00 2,377.50 0.00 2,377.50 830.46 0.00 830.46 197.38 0.00 197.38 4,955.77 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,955.77 8,361.11 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40.00 14,527.87 0.00 28.00 9,250.84 2,024.00 135.00 1,050.25 0.00 589.36 2,476.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,429.20 383.07 283.07 219.58 1,008.04 24.57 14,527.87 12,488.09 3,065.76 OCTOBER 30, 2002 / REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION SEPT 2002 CLAIM 10 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AliT DISC 199-611040-524100-00000 0.00 199-611040-641950-00000 0.00 199-611040-641100-00000 0.00 199-611040-646610-00000 0.00 AliT NET VCHR DISC 11.43 35.00 31.37 855.60 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 6,280.93 CHECK NO 30001780 30001780 593399 VENDOR 106680 - DON HUNTER. SHERIFF 21279 REIMB.COMBS OIL 21279 REIMB.COMBS OIL 001-106010-643200-00000 21442 REIMB.COMBS OIL 21442 REIMB.COMBS OIL 001-106010-643200-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,848,00 0.00 1,878.00 0.00 36,362.65 1,848.00 1,878.00 CHECK NO 30001215 30001215 30001215 593710 VENDOR 358390 - DOUGLAS L. SHEPARD, MD. PA D.BEHRINGER 4/25/02 251243 D,BEHRINGER 4/25/02 001-155930-631210-00000 D.BEHRINGER 8/22/02 251243 D.BEHRINGER 8/22/02 001-155930-631210-00000 D.BEHRINGER 8/7/02 251243 D.BEHRINGER 8/7/02 001-155930-631210-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3. 726. O0 0.00 71.50 0.00 71.50 0.00 52.00 0.00 52.00 0.00 52.00 0.00 52.00 CHECK NO 30001658 593378 VENDOR 14070 - DRS. DERY & EADS. P.A. A.GARCIA 9/20/02 001-155930-631210-00000 312048 A.GARCIA 9/20/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 175.50 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK NO 30001653 30001653 30001653 30001425 593457 VENDOR 166510 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 2817903 2817903 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 313-163673-633011-60018 2820565 2820565 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 191-138785-651210-44200 2819370 2819370 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 605-122390-651210-00000 12389 Q.BILL.JULY-SEPT/02 12389 QUARTER BILL.JULY-SEPT/02 113-138912-631820-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.00 0.00 95.50 0.00 95.50 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.570.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1,570.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001653 30001653 30001372 30001653 30001424 30001425 30001424 30001653 30001653 DESCRIPTION 2820567 2820567 COPIES.RECORDING,ETC. 2822581 2822581 COPIES.RECORDING,ETC. 12384 Q.BILL.JULY-SEPT/02 12384 QUART.BILL.JULY-SEPT/02 2815783 2815783 COPIES.RECORDING,ETC. 12388 Q.BILL.JULY-SEPT/02 12388 QUARTER BILL.JULY-SEPT/02 12282 Q.BILL.APRIL-JUN/02 12282 QUARTER BILL.APRIL-JUN/02 12390 Q.BILL.$ULY-SEPT/02 12390 QUARTER BILL.JULY-SEPT/02 2820029 2820029 COPIES,RECORDING.ETC. 2817905 2817905 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 001-122310-651210-00000 0.00 111-138317-651210-00000 0.00 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 113-138312-631820-00000 0.00 470-173410-651210-00000 0.00 113-178983-631820-00000 0.00 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 313-163673-633011-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 30001401 593544 VENDOR 256410 - DYNAMIC GRAPHICS MAGAZINE 806316 111-100130-652920-00000 251385 COMP.GP~APHICS SW 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 66.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 66.00 3.00 22.00 0.00 22.00 79.50 0.00 79.50 2,325.30 0.00 2,325.30 22.00 0.00 22.00 621.00 0.00 621.00 67.50 0.00 67.50 113.50 0.00 113.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4.987.30 0.00 687.62 0.00 687.62 CHECK NO 30001216 593339 VENDOR 6040 - E. RICHARD GRIECO M.D., P.A. D.ANZUALDA 8/30/02 001-155930-631210-00000 251244 D.ANZUALDA 8/30/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 687.62 0.00 487.50 0.00 487.50 CHECK NO 30001400 593526 VENDOR 240580 - EAGLE PACKAGING PRODUCTS, INC. 17382 472-173430-652990-33821 250383 SUPPL. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 487.50 0.00 284.90 0.00 284.90 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 284.90 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 593419 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC VENDOR 123830 - EASTSIDE ANIMAL CLINIC 30001225 02-10131 B.COBB 311671 02-10131 B.COBB 610-155413-631970-00000 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 30001225 01-09106 H.MCGILL 311671 01-09106 H.MCGILL 610-155413-631970-00000 PAGE VCHR NET 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 30001708 593732 VENDOR 364600 - EDGAR MARTINEZ 10/1-10/27/02 COMP.INST. 111-156380-634999-00000 310792 COMP.INSTR. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 120.00 0.00 156.00 0.00 156.00 CHECK NO 30001217 593418 VENDOR 122900 - EDUARDO R. HUERGO. M.D. J.COWDREY 9/24/02 001-155930-631210-00000 251245 J.COWDREY 9/24/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 156.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 130.00 CHECK NO 30001232 593741 VENDOR 365790 - EDWARD HUTCHESON REIMB.OF STYLUS M500 101-163640-652910-00000 251202 REIMB.PALM PILOT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 130.00 0.00 9.99 0.00 9.99 CHECK NO 30001423 593408 VENDOR 114800 - ELLIS K. PHELPS & COMPANY 062346 408-233351-655100-00000 310400 PARTS 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,149.00 0.00 9.99 3.149.00 CHECK NO 30001226 593470 VENDOR 179840 - EMERGENCY PET HOSPITAL OF COLLIER 15092 001-155410-631980-00000 311475 VET CARE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,149.00 0.00 92.00 0.00 92.00 CHECK NO 30001791 593756 VENDOR 366240 - ENTERPRISE LEASING CO. D672617 521-122410-644610-00000 312294 LEASING 0,00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 92.00 1,641.77 0.00 1.641.77 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001221 593488 VENDOR 199770 - ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECH OF SW FL 8138 001-122240-652994-00000 251108 GOLDEN GATE AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 1.641.77 0.00 601.00 0.00 601.00 CHECK NO 430101 593779 VENDOR 900050 - EUGENIA CHUCON REF.PARKS E.CHUCON 111-156313-347275-00000 REF.PARKS E.CHUCON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 601.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK NO 30001375 30001375 593340 VENDOR 6120 - EVANS OIL COMPANY 232351 310134 MOTOR OIL 521-122410-646425-00000 232351 DISC. 310134 MOTOR OIL 521-122410-646425-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.00 0.00 101.96 0.00 101.96 0.00 2.04- 0.00 2.04- CHECK NO 30001825 CHECK NO 30001857 CHECK NO 30001218 593746 VENDOR 365960 - EXECUTIVE TITLE & 62157240007 MSTGEORGES 191-138785-884100-44200 62157240007 MSTGEORGES 312140 593748 VENDOR 366040 - EXECUTIVE TITLE & CHARLES TROIA D/P C TROIA 00073600000 191-138785-884100-44200 00073600000 C TROIA 312377 593558 VENDOR 266240 - EYE CENTERS OF FLORIDA, P.A. L.CROSBY 9/9/02 001-155930-631210-00000 251246 L.CROSBY 9/9/02 0,00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 99.92 5,000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.000.00 5,000.00 2.500.00 2,500.00 0.00 125.45 0.00 125.45 CHECK NO 30001851 593502 VENDOR 214900 - F.P.L. 28385-65485 9/19-10/18/02 408-253211-643100-00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 125.45 25,494.61 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30001850 28385-65485 9/19-10/18/02 48425-34572 9/19-10/18/02 48425-34572 9/19-10/18/02 CHECK NO 30001219 593484 VENDOR 194860 - FCCMA DUES FOR LEO OCHS,JR 251235 ANNUAL DUES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-253212-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 001-100110-654210-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 38.396.99 0.00 8,346.98 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 63,891.60 8,346.98 72.238.58 308.00 0.00 308.00 CHECK NO 30001403 593322 VENDOR 256660 - FDLE/USER SERVICES BUREAU L.CHACON BACKGROUND CK 111-156343-634999-00000 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 308.00 0.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 CHECK NO 30001398 30001228 30001227 30001789 30001779 30001402 30001661 30001664 593341 VENDOR 6250 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 4-409-71336 311017 SHIPPING 4-391-96692 311257 SHIPPING 4-409-72474 310750 SHIPPING 4-436-41445 311085 SHIPPING 4-420-49266 311909 SHIPPING 4-393-97220 251384 SHIPPING 4-391-98344 312103 SHIPPING 4-391-59262 312103 SHIPPING 001-122310-641950-00000 518-121630-641950-00000 408-210120-641950-00000 001-101520-641950-00000 001-144510-641950-00000 111-100130-641950-00000 495-192310-641950-00000 495-192310-641950-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 6.35 0.00 32.00 6.35 0.00 16.25 0.00 16.25 0.00 5.55 0.00 0.00 9.15 0.00 5.55 9.15 0.00 73.10 0.00 73.10 0.00 52.65 0.00 52.65 0.00 6.05 0.00 6.05 0.00 15.35 0.00 15.35 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 184.45 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 593462 30001211 4-399-91691 310806 SHIPPING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC VENDOR 172870 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 30001491 4-403-90308 250861 SHIPPING 30001778 4-419-62407 310897 SHIPPING 001-138710-641950-00000 0.00 101-163630-641950-00000 0.00 101-163610-641950-00000 0.00 001-000000-142900-00000 0.00 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 7.50 0.00 11.80 17.85 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 7.50 29.65 27.95 0.00 27.95 CHECK NO 30001551 593562 VENDOR 271870 - FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. 735256-1 204231 PARTS 30001551 751144 204231 PARTS 30001551 751104 204231 PARTS 30001551 751107 204231 PARTS 30001551 749797 204231 PARTS 30001551 751098 204231 PARTS 301-120402-762200-53196 301-120402-762200-53196 301-120402-762200-53196 301-120402-762200-53196 301-120402-762200-53196 301-120402-762200-53196 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 65.10 0.00 936.58 0.00 936.58 0.00 110.52 0.00 110.52 0.00 102.49 0.00 102.49 0.00 299.16 0.00 299.16 0.00 182.96 0.00 182.96 0.00 138.74 0.00 138.74 CHECK NO 30001709 593398 VENDOR 105760 - FERGUSON UNDERGROUND 854104 310679 PARTS 30001489 848470 310224 PARTS 30001709 854358 310679 PARTS 30001222 855647 250229 STONE SOC FLAG 408-253212-655100-00000 408-253212-655100-00000 408-253212-655100-00000 408-233313-652990-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1. 770.45 0.00 791.00 0.00 791.00 0.00 40.87 0.00 40.87 0.00 137.40 0.00 137.40 0.00 547.13 0.00 547.13 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 30001230 30001230 30001230 593675 VENDOR 343520 - FGCA J.MERRITT 250935 ANN.DUES B.PEDONE 250935 ANN.DUES J.SEIDL 250935 ANN.DUES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-100130-654210-00000 0.00 111-100130-654210-00000 0.00 111-100130-654210-00000 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 60.00 35.00 60.00 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 1.516.40 60.00 35.00 60.00 CHECK NO 30001660 593608 VENDOR 303710 - FIRST ANESTHESIA ASSOC INC C.WRIGHT 8/9/02 001-155930-631210-00000 312052 C.WRIGHT 8/9/02 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 338.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 338.00 CHECK NO 430102 CHECK NO 30001224 30001235 593780 VENDOR 900050 - FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH NAPLES REF.PARKS FST BAPT.CHURCH 111-156390-347940-00000 REF.PARKS FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 593646 VENDOR 326720 - FIRST NATIONAL BANK 5436844203700127 408-210151-634999-00000 311207 LOCKBOX,DNAFTS&C/C SVS 5436844203700127 408-210151-634999-00000 311207LOCKBOX.DRAFTS,C/C SVS 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 40.00 CHECK TOTAL 785.19 1,171.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 338.00 40.00 40.00 785.19 1.171.44 CHECK NO 593411 VENDOR 116470 - FIRST TITLE & ABSTRACT, INC. 30001399 B-12696 408-210105-649990-00000 251319 BUENA VISTA PARCELS CHECK NO 30001223 593342 VENDOR 6430 - FISHER SCIENTIFIC 2154152 408-253221-652990-00000 250780 TNANS.ASSEMB. 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 225.00 CHECK TOTAL 38.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,956.63 225.00 225.00 38.75 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001234 593406 VENDOR 111530 - FISHER SCIENTIFIC 2325725 310351 SUPPL. 408-233350-652310-00000 408-233350-652990-00000 CHECK NO 30001229 30001229 30001229 593566 VENDOR 273880 - FLASH EQUIPMENT, INC. 32301 310052 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 32267 310052 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 32252 310052 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 148.30 0.00 1 CHECK NO 30001231 593522 VENDOR 239040 - FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COORDINATED MMB/SHIP COLLIER CTY MPO 126-138332-654210-35000 251275 MMB/SHIP COLLIER CTY MPO PAGE CHECK NO 30001657 593395 VENDOR 101720 - FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES REG.COMM.COLETTA 001-100010-640315-00000 251473 REG.COLE1-FA CONF.12/02 VCHR NET 38.75 CHECK NO 30001490 593501 VENDOR 211180 - FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF MUSEUMS MMB/SHIP DUES EVERGLADES 198-157430-654210-00000 251403 MMB/SHIP DUES EVERGLADES 148.30 CHECK NO 30001659 30001659 593532 VENDOR 248020 - FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS J,MARTINEZ 9/11/02 312053 J.MARTINEZ 9/11/02 001-155930-631210-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 148.30 0.00 91.82 0.00 91.82 0.00 471.12 0.00 471.12 0.00 463.27 0.00 463.27 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.026.21 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 200.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 200.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 4.55 0.00 4.55 G.OSTERVAL 9/3/02 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 35.75 0.00 35.75 312053 G.OSTERVAL 9/3/02 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001659 30001659 DESCRIPTION J.MARTINEZ 9/11/02 312053 J.FLARTINEZ 9/11/02 G.OSTERVAL 9/3/02 312053 G.OSTERVAL 9/3/02 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593321 VENDOR 132370 - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 30001220 APP.CONSTR.OF 8"MAIN 409-287150-649010-70077 AND 161 CHECK NO 30001710 593465 VENDOR 174410 - FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRO PROTECTION PERMIT APP FEE 412-273512-649010-70045 251491 PERMIT APP FEE AMI' NET VCHR DISC 11.70 0.00 CHECK NO 30001620 593603 VENDOR 299710 - FLORIDA EDACS USERS GROUP REGIS 11/18-22/02 J.DALY 001-121141-654360-00000 251407 REGIS 11/18-22/02 J.DALY 1 CHECK NO 30001233 593499 VENDOR 209390 - FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES IVC0003969 001-121110-634999-00000 251282 ADV.ADM.POSITION PAGE CHECK NO 30001488 593581 VENDOR 281320 - FLORIDA MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC 021218 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-641950-00000 310121 PARTS VCHR NET 11.70 CHECK NO 30001465 593346 VENDOR 6790 - FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 01110-99024 9/9-10/8/02 101-163609-643100-00000 312-163615-643100-00000 01110-99024 9/9-10/8/02 11.70 0.00 11.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 63.70 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 250.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 500.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 0.00 45.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.25 0.00 126.83 0.00 126.82 0.00 253.65 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001652 30001652 30001465 30001465 30001465 30001652 30001652 30001465 30001465 30001652 30001465 30001652 30001652 30001465 30001465 30001465 30001465 DESCRIPTION 67921-12424 9/20-10/21/02 67921-12424 9/20-10/21/02 94697-48330 9/23-10/22/02 94697-48330 9/23-10/22/02 90159-54119 9/9-9/26/02 90159-54119 9/9-9/26/02 04220-92486 9/18-10/17/02 04220-92486 9/18-10/17/02 23856-80547 9/18-10/17/02 23856-80547 9/18-10/17/02 75152-48438 9/23-10/22/02 75152-48438 9/23-10/22/02 87251-32073 9/20-10/21/02 87251-32073 9/20-10/21/02 17775-55192 9/18-10/17/02 17775-55192 9/18-10/17/02 41885-16233 9/18-10/17/02 41885-16233 9/18-10/17/02 76422-01375 11/27-12/28/1 76422-01375 11/27-12/28/01 46435-93405 9/18-10/17/02 46435-93405 9/18-10/17/02 39125-82172 9/20-10/21/02 39125-82172 9/20-10/21/02 48611-71017 9/23-10/22/02 48611-71017 9/23-10/22/02 83744-53408 9/18-10/17/02 83744-53408 9/18-10/17/02 40357-28403 9/17-10/16/02 40357-28403 9/17-10/16/02 55109-29473 9/16-10/15/02 55109-29473 9/16-10/15/02 97820-17231 9/18-10/17/02 97820-17231 9/18-10/17/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 001-106010-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 001-156140-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 161 1 990.30 0.00 990,30 20.04 0.00 20.04 10.37 0.00 10.37 7.59 O. O0 7.59 30.57 0.00 30.57 972.85 0.00 972.85 17.42 0.00 17.42 390.08 0.00 390.08 5.70 0.00 5.70 78.80 0.00 78.80 12.05 0.00 12.05 11.69 0.00 11.69 83.39 0.00 83.39 8.46 0.00 8.46 931.18 0.00 931.18 76.86 0.00 76.86 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 8.46 0.00 8.46 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 30001652 90849-80235 9/20-10/21/02 90849-80235 9/20-10/21/02 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 11.39 0.00 11.39 30001652 99914-46015 9/23-10/22/02 99914-46015 9/23-10/22/02 001-156170-643100-00000 0.00 886.34 0.00 886.34 30001848 63291-11170 9/23-10/22/02 63291-11170 9/23-10/22/02 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 7,197.70 0.00 7,197.70 30001465 85144-11340 9/9-10/8/02 85144-11340 9/9-10/8/02 312-163615-643100-00000 0.00 212.92 0.00 212.92 30001652 25211-69579 9/19-10/18/02 25211-69579 9/19-10/18/02 408-233313-643100-00000 0,00 1,163.44 0.00 1,163.44 30001465 49448-23196 9/16-10/15/02 49448-23196 9/16-10/15/02 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 79.17 0.00 79.17 30001465 67496-05199 9/18-10/17/02 67496-05199 9/18-10/17/02 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 30001465 84554-61122 9/18-10/17/02 84554-61122 9/18-10/17/02 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 8.46 0.00 8.46 30001848 03677-75210 9/19-10/18/02 03677-75210 9/19-10/18/02 408-233312-643100-00000 0.00 14,308.49 0.00 14,308.49 30001848 42765-77089 9/13-10/14/02 42765-77089 9/13-10/14/02 001-156175-643100-00000 0.00 8,862.51 0.00 8,862.51 30001652 24516-13315 9/23-10/22/02 24516-13315 9/23-10/22/02 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 330.91 0.00 330.91 30001465 23664-71569 9/19-10/18/02 23664-71569 9/19-10/18/02 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 10.96 0.00 10.96 30001465 44367-71481 9/18-10/17/02 44367-71481 9/18-10/17/02 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 11.47 0.00 11.47 30001465 78097-77233 9/18-10/17/02 78097-77233 9/18-10/17/02 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 71.61 0.00 71.61 30001465 33992-34388 9/16-10/15/02 33992-34388 9/16-10/15/02 111-156332-643100-00000 0.00 971.58 0.00 971.58 30001465 48933-09023 9/9-10/8/02 48933-09023 9/9-10/8/02 101-163609-643100-00000 0.00 312-163615-643100-00000 0.00 139.48 139.47 0.00 278.95 30001465 42069-24401 9/18-10/17/02 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 66.35 0.00 66.35 42069-24401 9/18-10/17/02 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001652 30001848 DESCRIPTION 72563-70011 9/20-10/21/02 72563-70011 9/20-10/21/02 70418-33158 9/17-10/16/02 70418-33158 9/17-10/16/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-253212-643100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001662 593609 VENDOR 305020 - FLORIDA RESEARCH, INC 105753 470-173410-634999-00000 312148 CLIPPING SVS 0.00 CHECK NO 30001483 30001483 593683 VENDOR 347960 - FLORIDA SEALING PRODUCTS, INC 024808 DISC. 311593 SUPPL. 408-233352-652910-00000 024808 311593 SUPPL. 408-233352-652910-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001640 30001630 30001630 30001640 593431 VENDOR 135230 - FLORIDA STATE UNDERGROUND. INC #13 102895 TO 8/25/02 411-273511-763100-70862 #2 - RETAINAGE 206258 TO 9/25/02 - RETAINAGE 412-000000-205100-00000 206258 TO 9/25/02 412-273512-763100-70066 #13 - RETAINAGE 102895 TO 8/25/02 - RETAINAGE 411-000000-205100-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001405 593630 VENDOR 318590 - FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC 14691 521-122410-646425-00000 310120 PARTS 0.00 CHECK NO 593347 VENDOR 6960 - FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION AMT NET 12.36 6,770.31 CHECK TOTAL 59.00 CHECK TOTAL 1.09- 229.54 CHECK TOTAL 3,895.50 21,590.53- 215,905.35 389.55- CHECK TOTAL 273.20 CHECK TOTAL 161 VCHR DISC 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 12.36 6,770.31 45,174.38 59.00 59. O0 1.09- 229.54 228.45 3,895.50 21,590.53- 215,905.35 389.55- 197,820.77 273.20 273.20 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001484 DESCRIPTION 30-SEP QUARTER ENDED 9/30/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AliT DISC 001-103010-525100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001663 593528 VENDOR 243280 - FLORIDA WATER SERVICES 001612805-0 9/4-10/7 495-192370-643400-00000 001612805-0 9/4-10/7 312161 CHECK NO 593626 VENDOR 316800 - FOCUS ENGINEERING, INC. 30001641 #27 414-263611-631400-74023 414-263614-631400-74023 6127 9/02 AMT NET VCHR DISC 7,528.50 0.00 CHECK NO 30001813 593445 VENDOR 157320 - FREEMAN AND FREEMAN INC. 77 191-138785-884200-44200 3268040001VASQUEZ 312129 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001371 30001371 30001371 30001371 30001371 30001371 30001371 593707 575144 310119 PARTS 575155 310119 PARTS 575326 310119 PARTS 574785 310119 PARTS 574907 310119 PARTS 575146 310119 PARTS 575171 310119 PARTS VENDOR 358110 - FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS-SW FL 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 1 PAGE VCHR NET 7,528.50 7,528.50 0.00 248.69 0.00 248.69 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 248.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,815.77 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 70.00- 0.00 14,815.77 14.815.77 15,000.00 15,000.00 70.00- 0.00 214.16 0.00 214.16 0.00 173.58 0.00 173.58 0.00 389.98 0.00 389.98 0.00 601.78 0.00 601.78 0.00 134.04 0.00 134.04 0.00 606.70 0.00 606.70 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001371 575093 310119 PARTS 30001371 575145 310119 PARTS 30001371 575103 310119 PARTS 30001371 574604 310119 PARTS 30001371 574649 310119 PARTS CHECK NO 593662 30001320 836775 310227 30001311 831437 311657 30001316 833111 311656 30001319 836773 310178 30001311 835766 311657 30001324 835779 311602 30001316 828993 311656 30001325 835780 310712 30001320 832241 310227 DESCRIPTION VENDOR 333980 - G&K SERVICES UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 408-253212-652130-00000 0.00 470-173441-652130-00000 0.00 470-173442-652130-00000 0.00 408-253211-652130-00000 0.00 470-173441-652130-00000 0.00 408-253250-652130-00000 0.00 470-173442-652130-00000 0.00 408-253221-652130-00000 0.00 408-253212-652130-00000 0.00 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 337.22 0.00 319.98- 0.00 1 PAGE 49 VCHR NET 337.22 319.98- 67.02 0.00 67.02 136.61 0.00 136.61 575.20 0.00 575.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,846.31 235.97 0.00 235.97 31.33 0.00 31.33 12.51 0.00 12.51 88.37 0.00 88.37 32.08 0,00 32.08 35.70 0.00 35.70 18.37 0.00 18.37 69,72 0.00 69.72 255,72 0.00 255.72 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 779.77 CHECK NO 593667 VENDOR 339190 - G&K SERVICES OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001315 30001315 30001315 30001323 30001315 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 828973 311745 SUPPLIES 833091 311745 SUPPLIES 833936 311745 SUPPLIES 833934 311104 UNIFORMS 829805 10/2/02 311745 SUPPLIES 521-122410-652130-00000 0.00 521-122410-652130-00000 0.00 521-122410-652130-00000 0.00 101-163620-652130-00000 0.00 521-122410-652130-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001309 30001309 30001309 593349 11903271 311391 LARGE PRINT 11891644 311391 LARGE PRINT 11898983 311391 LARGE PRINT VENDOR 7400 - GALE RESEARCH COMPANY 355-156190-766100-54260 AMI' NET VCHR DISC 8.36 0.00 8.41 0.00 CHECK NO 30001308 593425 VENDOR 127700 - GAMETIME 680445 250974 PLIERS 1 CHECK NO 30001624 593709 VENDOR 358260 - GARY MOROCCO 10/3-4/02 TRVL G.MOROCCO 10/3-4/02 TRVL G.MOROCCO PAGE CHECK NO 30001445 593348 VENDOR 330197 311178 SUPPLIES VCHR NET 8.36 8.41 162.04 0,00 162.04 270.45 0.00 270.45 114.54 0.00 114.54 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 563.80 0.00 411.08 0.00 411.08 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 355-156190-766100-54260 0.00 44.17 0,00 44.17 160.22 0.00 160.22 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 615.47 179.00 0.00 179.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 179.00 28.80 0.00 28.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 28.80 1,243.50 0.00 111-156332-652910-00000 0.00 470-173463-640300-00000 0.00 0.00 7320 - GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC. 001-156175-652610-00000 1,243.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.243.50 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 593781 VENDOR 900050 GENEVIEVE ADAMS 430120 BOOK REFUND G. ADAMS 001-156110-347110-00000 0.00 BOOK REFUND G. ADAMS CHECK NO 30001448 593654 VENDOR 330010 GEORGE A. GAMOURAS, M.D. W. GI~ANT 7/31,8/1&8/2 001-155930-631210-00000 W. GRANT 7/31 8/1 8/2 251247 161 CHECK NO 430104 593771 VENDOR 900040 04729839400 GL HOMES 04729839400 GL HOMES GL HOMES BUILDING CORP 408-000000-115001-00000 NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 430108 593772 VENDOR 900040 GL HOMES BUILDERS CORP 04729484900 GL HOMES 408-000000-115001-00000 GL HOMES 2171KHASIA PT PAGE CHECK NO 430107 593773 VENDOR 900040 GL HOMES BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 04728329700 GL HOMES 408-000000-115001-00000 GL HOMES 2330 BU1-FERFLY PALM DR 1 CHECK NO 430111 430106 430110 430109 430105 593774 04729793100 C. RIC~AS C.RIGAS 2342 BU1-FERFLY PALM DR. 04729793200 GL HOMES GL HOMES 2151 KHASIA PT 04729859200 GL HOMES GL HOMES 2317 BU1-FERFLY PALM DR. 04729860000 GL HOMES GL HOMES 1292 BARRIGONA CT 04729610300 GL HOMES GL HOMES 1418 KING SAGO CT VENDOR 900040 GL HOMES BUILDING CORP 408-000000-115001-00000 408-000000-115001-00000 408-000000-115001-00000 408-000000-115001-00000 408-000000-115001-00000 VCHR NET 10.00 0.00 10.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.00 0.00 412.75 0.00 412.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 412.75 0.00 27.34 0.00 27.34 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 27.34 0.00 27.22 0.00 27.22 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 27.22 0.00 12.70 0.00 12.70 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 12.70 0.00 22.06 0.00 22.06 0.00 44.44 0.00 44.44 0.00 13.86 0.00 13.86 0.00 33.76 0.00 33.76 0.00 20.20 0.00 20.20 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001318 593615 VENDOR 313740 - GLADYS R. COOKE PEEWEE & JR SOCCER 8/27 111-156381-634999-00000 PEE WEE & JR SOCCER 8/27-10/8 0.00 CHECK NO 30001328 593350 VENDOR 7740 - GOLDEN GATE ANIMAL CLINIC N. REISINGER 02-10607 610-155413-631970-00000 N. REISINGER 02-10607 0.00 CHECK NO 30001313 30001313 30001313 30001313 593351 VENDOR 76736 310439 MULCH 76750 310439 MULCH 76704 310439 MULCH 76738 310439 MULCH 7770 - GOLDEN GATE NURSERY 408-233351-646314-00000 408-233351-646314-00000 408-233351-646314-00000 408-233351-646314-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001322 30001322 30001322 593468 VENDOR 178630 - GP. AINGER 2875133320 310136 SUPPLIES 2873206581 310136 SUPPLIES 2875133338 310136 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001440 593352 VENDOR 0630268404 310829 SUPPLIES 7900 - GP~AYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 111-156332-652991-00000 0.00 AM1- NET CHECK TOTAL 292,50 CHECK TOTAL 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 26.90 95.00 21.52 190.00 CHECK TOTAL 235.77 86.02 5.08 CHECK TOTAL 1,543.35 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 134.32 292.50 292.50 75.00 75.00 26.90 95.00 21.52 190.00 333.42 235.77 86.02 5.08 326,87 1,543.35 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001446 30001446 30001446 30001312 30001446 30001446 30001312 30001446 30001314 30001446 DESCRIPTION 0630267473 310829 SUPPLIES 0630267117 310829 SUPPLIES 0630267056 310829 SUPPLIES 0630268578 310564 SUPPLIES 0630268393 310829 SUPPLIES 0630268583 310829 SUPPLIES 0630268577 310564 SUPPLIES 0630267119 310829 SUPPLIES 0620892161 310548 SUPPLIES 0630268374 310829 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156332-652991-00000 0.00 111-156332-652991-00000 0.00 111-156332-652991-00000 0.00 408-233312-655200-00000 0.00 111-156332-652991-00000 0.00 111-156332-652991-00000 0.00 408-233312-655200-00000 0.00 111-156332-652991-00000 0.00 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652991-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001310 593524 VENDOR 239140 - GREAT AMERICA LEASING CORPORATION 2700600 408-210105-644620-00000 310160 LEASES CHECK NO 30001317 593706 VENDOR 357210 - GREGG STRAKALUSE REIMB G, STRAKALUSE 312-163615-649010-00000 REIMB G. STRAKALUSE AMT NET VCHR DISC 27.73 0.00 CHECK NO 30001321 593353 VENDOR 7990 - GULFSHORE ANIMAL CLINIC M. PINDER 02-10745 610-155413-631970-00000 M, PINDER 02-10745 VCHR NET 27.73 481.68 0.00 481.68 166.35 0.00 166.35 119.08 0.00 119.08 40.20 0.00 40.20 805.14 0.00 805.14 240.47 0.00 240.47 87.26 0.00 87.26 32,76 0.00 32,76 329.30 0.00 329.30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,873.32 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 225.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 225.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 489.00 0.00 489.00 0.00 489.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30001321 C. STEWART 010284 C. STEWART 02-10284 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593443 VENDOR 152410 - HACH 30001332 3211559 310370 TEST 30001330 3216336 310382 SUPPLIES 30001303 3213592 250300 SUPPLIES 30001332 3211559 310370 TEST 408-233350-652990-00000 0.00 114-178975-652910-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-233350-652310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593354 VENDOR 8180 - HARBORSIDE ANIMAL CLINIC 30001327 D. DOUGLAS 02-10369 610-155413-631970-00000 D. DOUGLAS 02-10369 30001327 A. AYERS 02-10569 610-155413-631970-00000 A. AYERS 02-10569 AMT NET VCHR DISC 60.00 0.00 CHECK NO 430094 593799 VENDOR 900080 - HEALTH TRADITION HEALTH PLAN COMMER AMB REF T. SEIBEL 2/14/02 490-000000-116004-00000 AMB REFT. SEIBEL 2/14/02 1 CHECK NO 30001380 593469 VENDOR 179280 - HEIDI ASHTON 10/16-18/02 TRVL H.ASHTON 10/16-18/02 TRVL H.ASHTON 001-100510-640300-00000 PAGE CHECK NO 30001799 593489 VENDOR 199810 - HELENE ROSSLER 8/21-10/8 TRVL H.ROSSLER 8/21-10/8 TRVL H.ROSSLER 123-155972-640200-34640 123-155974-640200-44600 123-155974-640200-44620 VCHR NET 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 105.00 25.48 0.00 25.48 402.44 0.00 402.44 179.00 0.00 179.00 515.59 0.00 515.59 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.122.51 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 O.O0 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 120.00 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 42.00 0.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 12.68 0.00 15.23 0.00 22.84 0.00 56.00 50.75 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001503 593355 VENDOR 8470 HERB LUNTZ H. LUNTZ POLITICAL SIGN H. LUNTZ POLITICAL SIGN 670-000000-220113-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001630 593535 VENDOR 251890 HERIBERTO HARTNACK 10/6-10 TRVL H.HARTNACK 001-155230-640300-00000 10/6-10/02 TRVL H.HARTNACK PAGE 161 1' CHECK NO 30001305 593700 VENDOR 355210 3954834-001 250290 WATER TRUCK HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL 408-253212-644600-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001617 593758 VENDOR 366320 HILTON SANDESTIN BEACH GOLF 10/4-6/02 HOTEL J.COLETTA 001-100010-640315-00000 251474 10/4-6/02 HOTEL J.COLETTA VCHR NET 50.75 CHECK NO 30001621 593435 VENDOR 144300 HILTON TOWERS CONF#3151906233 J.DALY 251408 CONF#3151906233 J.DALY 001-121141-640300-00000 500.00 0.00 500.00 CHECK NO 593656 VENDOR 331450 30001444 900ADK0209 311633 SUPPLIES 30001444 900ADK0208 311633 SUPPLIES HIRECHECK. INC. 001-121810-634999-00000 001-121810-634999-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 500.00 0.00 129.30 0.00 129.30 CHECK NO 593356 VENDOR 8810 - HOLE MONTES AND ASSOC INC 30001722 44494 334-163650-631990-60134 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 129.30 0.00 415.85 0.00 415.85 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 415.85 0.00 242.00 0.00 242.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 242.00 0.00 495.00 0.00 495.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 495.00 1,149.00 0.00 0.00 1.149.00 0.00 673.00 0.00 673.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.822.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 205044 8/24-9/27/02 30001727 44539 102671 8/24-9/27/02 30001720 43795R2 205760 3/30-5/24/02 30001720 44102R 205760 5/25-7/26/02 30001726 44538 7479 8/24-9/27/02 30001725 44537 103670 8/24-9/27/02 30001724 44541 103671 8/24-9/27/02 30001723 44540 106876 8/24-9/27/02 CHECK NO 593673 VENDOR 342220 - HOLLISTER INC. 30001439 90921503 311347 ANIMAL COLLAR CHECK NO 593455 VENDOR 164250 - HOME DEPOT 30001307 00455/2311048 251170 SUPPLIES CHECK NO' 593694 VENDOR 352900 - HOME DEPOT 30001814 6191670 00075440006 ESTRADA 251390 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 334-163654-631990-60134 0.00 496-192340-631400-33010 0.00 497-192340-631400-33010 0.00 497-192343-631400-33010 0.00 414-263614-631400-74011 0.00 414-263614-631400-74011 0.00 496-192341-631400-33330 0.00 496-192340-631400-33343 0.00 496-192340-631400-33327 0.00 496-192340-631400-33327 0.00 496-192340-631400-33383 0.00 001-155410-652990-00000 0.00 001-157110-652990-00000 0.00 001-157110-652310-00000 0.00 001-157110-646320-00000 0.00 191-138785-884200-44200 0.00 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1,281.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 983.10 0.00 27,536.85 0.00 10,382.50 0.00 3,742.50 O. O0 4,114. O0 0.00 0.00 5,010.75 0.00 3,635. O0 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,055.70 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,97 33.93 27.29 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 1,281.94 983.10 27,536.85 10,382.50 3,742.50 4,114.00 5,010.75 3.635.00 56,686.64 1,055.70 1,055.70 64.19 64.19 35.00 0.00 35.00 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001535 DESCRIPTION 6191669 00075440006 ESTRADA 251391 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 ACCOUNT NO ~JvFF DISC 191-138785-884200-44200 0.00 CHECK NO 30001329 30001443 593578 VENDOR 279710 - HORVATH ELECTRIC MOTORS 5459 408-253212-634999-00000 310234 LABOR 5432 408-253221-634999-00000 310716 SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001340 593424 VENDOR 127370 - HOWCO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LTD. 70036561 521-122410-649990-00000 310118 SUPPLIES 0.00 CHECK NO 430095 593800 VENDOR 900080 - HUMANA HEALTH INSURANCE AMB REF C. JOHNSON 2/23/0 490-000000-116004-00000 ~ REF C. JOHNSON 2/23/00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001304 593521 VENDOR 238740 - HY TECH WHOLESALE SI-2001499 518-121630-652990-00000 251157 SUPPLIES 0.00 CHECK NO 30001306 30001306 30001306 30001331 593357 VENDOR 099487 310137 SUPPLIES 099585 310137 SUPPLIES 100251 310137 SUPPLIES 100168 310137 SUPPLIES 9020 - HYDRAULIC HOSE AND EQUIP 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 495.00 1.650.35 CHECK TOTAL 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 185.00 CHECK TOTAL 200.50 CHECK TOTAL 61.69 58.24 48.60 93.71 16.1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 30.00 65.00 495.00 1,650.35 2,145.35 45.00 45.00 185.00 185.00 200.50 200.50 61.69 58.24 48.60 93.71 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30001306 100250 310137 SUPPLIES 30001326 100164 250374 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 470-173441-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593611 VENDOR 310350 - IMAGE ONE 30001299 41794 250779 SOFTWARE 30001334 41772 250504 MAINTNANCE 30001442 41009 311776 HARDWARE MAINT 30001333 41793 250929 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 408-210111-634999-00000 0.00 312-163615-634999-00000 0.00 001-121710-646910-00000 0.00 101-163610-649990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593358 VENDOR 30001337 484 10/1-10/31 484 10/1-10/31 30001337 371 10/1-10/31 371 10/1-10/31 30001302 #432 10/1-10/31 ~432 10/1-10/31 9180 - IMMOKALEE DISPOSAL CO 111-156334-643300-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 58.00 0.00 PAGE CHECK NO 593754 VENDOR 366180 - INDCO 30001300 00134517 251284 SUPPLIES 1 CHECK NO 593359 VENDOR 30001338 42862 311735 SUPPLIES VCHR NET 58.00 147.31 0.00 147.31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 467.55 210.00 0.00 210.00 567.00 0.00 567.00 1,069,00 0.00 1,069.00 210.00 O.O0 210.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,056,00 0.00 330.66 0.00 330.66 73.28 0.00 73.28 330.66 0.00 330.66 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 734.60 217.22 0.00 217.22 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 217.22 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 001-122370-643300-00000 0.00 111-156334-643300-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 9270 - INDUSTRIAL AIR PRODUCTS 101-163620-652990-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 593739 VENDOR 365730 - INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT 30001301 17743 251023 REINSURANCE ADV 516-121650-645910-00000 161 CHECK NO 30001298 593579 VENDOR 280060 - INTERNATIONAL SOC. OF ARBORICULTURE CD ROM HORTICOPIA 111-163647-652920-00000 111-163647-641950-00000 251307 CD ROM AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30001297 593735 VENDOR 365400 - INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF GUIDE FOR PLANT APPR 312-163615-654110-00000 312-163615-641950-00000 250501 BOOKS PAGE CHECK NO 30001336 30001441 30001335 30001335 593616 VENDOR 313840 - IOSCAPITAL 56345337 311936 SUPPLIES 56451685 311242 SUPPLIES 56476027 311014 SUPPLIES 56476031 311014 SUPPLIES 681-421510-644620-00000 681-431310-644620-00000 681-410510-644620-00000 681-410510-644620-00000 1 VCHR NET 0.00 722.00 0.00 722.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 722.00 CHECK NO 30001833 593715 VENDOR 359620 - ISLANDS AND HIGHLANDS, LLC 0CT-2002 001-106010-644100-00000 0CT-2002 312215 0.00 275.00 0.00 31.95 0.00 CHECK NO 3O001634 593744 VENDOR 365910 - ITS FLORIDA TRANSPO 2002 REG 12/8-11/02 E.ICANT 101-163610-654360-00000 250860 REGIS 12/8-11/02 E.ICANT 306.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 306.95 0,00 150.00 0.00 10.95 0.00 160.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 160.95 0.00 810.34 0.00 810.34 1,017.05 0.00 0.00 1,017.05 0.00 359.07 0.00 359.07 0.00 139.82 0.00 139.82 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3.006.25 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.326.28 3.006.25 3,006.25 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001775 593454 VENDOR 163520 - J. DANIEL LABS, M.D. CONYERS J 9/5 001-155930-631210-00000 251249 CONYERS J 0.00 CHECK NO 30001764 593515 VENDOR 229750 - J.C.PRODUCTIONS 100522 111-156341-634999-00000 SOUND SYSTEM CHILD SAFELY 0.00 CHECK NO 30001773 30001773 30001773 593674 VENDOR 343350 - J.W. CRAFT 37337 311658 PORTABLE TOILET 37336 311658 PORTABLE TOILET 37336 311658 PORTABLE TOILET 470-173443-634999-00000 470-173443-634999-00000 470-173443-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 430121 593782 VENDOR 900050 - JACK VAN HOORRBEKE REF 2002100395 J HOORRBEK 113-138900-322110-00000 2002100395 J VANHOORRBEKE 0.00 CHECK NO 30001765 593570 VENDOR 275540 - JACKIE NOLDER 10-29-02 JACKIE NOLDER 250200 JACKIE NOLDER 10-29-02 130-157710-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430129 593783 VENDOR 900050 - JACKSON POOLS, INC 2002100219 JACKSON POOLS 113-000000-209102-00000 2002100219 JASKSON POOLS INC 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 51.35 CHECK TOTAL 500.00 CHECK TOTAL 70.00 43.40 20.00 CHECK TOTAL 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 125.00 CHECK TOTAL 50.00 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 150.00 51.35 51.35 500.00 500.00 70.00 43.40 20.00 133.40 100.00 100.00 125.00 125.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 430126 DESCRIPTION 593784 VENDOR 900050 JAMES AMBROSE J AMBROSE REFUND PARKS J AMBROSE REFUND PARKS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 670-000000-220010-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001631 593537 VENDOR 254550 JAMES VON RINTELN 10/16-18/02 TRVL J.VONRIN 118-144211-640300-34300 10/16-18/02 TRVL J,VONRINTELN CHECK NO 30001806 593737 VENDOR 365550 JAN BENNEl-r REIMB EXP LESS TAXES 251172 REIMB EXP LESS TAXES 001-157110-652990-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30001758 593453 VENDOR 162530 JAN FORSZPANIAK M.D. HOLDER B 8-30-02 001-155930-631210-00000 251250 HOLDER B 8-30-02 VCHR NET CHECK NO 430130 593763 VENDOR 900030 JANEEN D.PERSON-COALE 10/14 TRVL J.PERSON-COALE 121-138755-640300-34500 10/14 TRVL J.PERSON-COALE 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 30001625 30001616 30001798 593648 VENDOR 327050 JANET GO 10/3-4/02 P/D J.GO 10/3-4/02 P/D J.GO 10/6-8/02 P/D TRVL J.GO 10/6-8/02 P/D TRVL J.GO 10/18/02 P/D J.GO 10/18/02 P/D J.GO 470-173463-640300-00000 470-173410-640300-00000 470-173463-640300-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 0.00 89.00 0.00 89.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 89.00 CHECK NO 593785 VENDOR 900050 - JANETH LLAROA 0.00 244.63 0.00 244.63 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 244.63 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 65.00 0.00 21.80 0.00 21.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.80 0.00 21.00 0.00 21.00 0.00 38.00 0.00 38.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 6.00 65.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 430128 DESCRIPTION J LLAROA REFUND PARKS J LLAROA REFUND PARKS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 670-000000-220010-00000 0,00 CHECK NO 30001757 593510 VENDOR 226290 HARKER JUDY 9-10-02 HARKER JUDY 9-10-02 JANICE N. YOUNG, M.D., P.A. 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430123 593786 VENDOR 900050 JASON LASHLEY JASON LASHLEY BOOK REFUND JASON LASHLEY BOOK REFUND 001-156110-347110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001378 593523 VENDOR 239070 JEAN MERRITT 9/18-21/02 TRVL J.MERRITT 9/18-21/02 TRVL J,MERRI1-F 111-100130-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593360 VENDOR 9920 JEFFREY MCCARTNEY, M.D.P.A. 30001755 BRADBURY LYNDA 9-06-02 001-155930-631210-00000 251252 BRADBURY LYNDA 9-06-02 0.00 CHECK NO 30001852 593751 VENDOR 366100 JEFFREY RUGGIERI INTERVIWE EXP J RUGGIERI 113-138312-640310-00000 251285 INTERVIEW EXP J RUGGIERI 0.00 CHECK NO 30001766 593742 VENDOR 365890 10-08-02 JESUS ESCOBAR 251200 JESUS ESCOBAR JESUS ESCOBAR 408-253212-649010-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430131 593764 VENDOR 900030 10/6-8/02 P/D J.BROWN 10/6-8/02 P/D J.BROWN JILL BROWN 470-173410-640300-00000 0.00 AMT NET 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 98.15 CHECK TOTAL 45.84 CHECK TOTAL 245.00 CHECK TOTAL 81,25 CHECK TOTAL 360.36 CHECK TOTAL 60.25 CHECK TOTAL 30.00 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 1 VCHR NET 30.00 30.00 98.15 98.15 45.84 45.84 245.00 245.00 81.25 81.25 360.36 360.36 60.25 60.25 30.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001749 593536 VENDOR 253330 - JILL DALTON 10-16-02 LINE DANCING 310770 LINE DANCING 111-156390-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001756 593668 VENDOR 340500 - JILL V. HICKEY, D.P.M. 3600 001-155930-631210-00000 251253 PRO SERV AIMEE CHECK NO 30001809 30001809 593650 VENDOR 327630 - JIM & SLIM'S TOOL SUPPLY 730102 521-122410-646425-00000 251225 FILTER CAP 731618 521-122410-646425-00000 251225 FILTER CAP AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE CHECK NO 30001754 593446 VENDOR 157530 - JOHN A. CRIST, M.D. PREYSS, E 9/5 9/12 9/20 001-155930-631210-00000 251254 PREYSS E 9/5 9/12 9/20 VCHR NET 30.00 CHECK NO 30000934 593361 VENDOR 10240 - JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 4-FINAL 313-163673-631400-60018 104580 12/3/01-9/30/02 195.00 0.00 195.00 CHECK NO 30001748 30001748 593423 VENDOR 127280 - JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 194113 001-122240-652996-00000 311340 24V MOTOR 194809 001-122240-652996-000D0 311340 FILTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 195.00 0.00 77.03 0.00 77.03 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 77.03 0.00 35.15 0.00 35.15 0.00 26.59 0.00 26.59 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 61.74 0.00 333.45 0.00 333.45 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 333.45 2,321.98 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,321.98 2,321.98 O. O0 76.54 O. O0 76.54 0.00 11.47 0.00 11.47 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 88.01 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001808 30001808 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 593482 VENDOR 193480 - JONES CHEMICAL 108744 408-253221-652310-00000 310718 CAUSTIC SODA 108743 408-253221-652310-00000 310718 CAUSTIC SODA AMT DISC 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001438 593734 VENDOR 365300 - JOSEPH QUINTY INTERVIEW EXP J QUINTY 250499 QUINTY J 101-163612-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001457 593568 VENDOR 275140 - KADY ARNOLD 9/18-21 PARKING K.ARNOLD 9/18-21 PARKING K.ARNOLD 111-100130-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430134 593765 VENDOR 900030 - KAREN GREISIGER 10/23 TRVL K.GREISIGER 001-122240-654370-00000 10/23/02 TRVL K.GREISIGER 0.00 CHECK NO 30001769 593362 VENDOR 10690 - KELLY BLUEPRINTERS 16278 113-138320-651210-00000 311154 EQUIPTMENT 0.00 CHECK NO 593483 VENDOR 194110 - KILPATRICK TURF EQUIPMENT 30001771 4269000 310117 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 30001771 4297500 310117 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 30001771 4116500 310117 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 AffF NET 3,089.39 3,097.11 CHECK TOTAL 387.30 CHECK TOTAL 32.00 CHECK TOTAL 12.09 CHECK TOTAL 18.51 CHECK TOTAL 217.80 43.10 182.05- 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 1' VCHR NET 3,089.39 3,097.11 6,186.50 387.30 387.30 32.00 32.00 12.09 12.09 18.51 18.51 217.80 43.10 182.05- 30001771 '4239300 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 47.00 0.00 47.00 310117 PARTS OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001771 30001771 30001771 30001771 4282100 310117 PARTS 4278000 310117 PARTS 4306700 310117 PARTS 4261000 310117 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430049 593787 VENDOR 900050 - KIMBALL HILL HOMES KIMBALL HILL HOMES 364519 113-000000-115420-00000 KIMBALL HILL HOMES 364519 161 CHECK NO 20046090 20046090 30001646 30001646 593363 VENDOR 10890 - KRAFT CONSTRUCTION #11 - RETAINAGE 202300 TO 9/25/02 - RETAINAGE 301-000000-205100-00000 #11 202300 TO 9/25/02 301-120402-762200-80196 #2 - RETAINAGE 311007 TO 9/25/02 - RETAINAGE 113-000000-205100-00000 311007 TO 9/25/02 113-138311-762200-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 126.72- 0.00 1 PAGE 65 VCHR NET 126.72- CHECK NO 30001772 593686 VENDOR 349520 - KRISTEN GOGERTY 10/1-24/02 111-156390-634999-00000 310772 10/1-24/02 287.74 0.00 287.74 CHECK NO 430098 593766 VENDOR 900030 - KRISTINA EAGER 10/16-18/02 P/D K.EAGER 001-122240-654370-00000 10/16-18/02 P/D K.EAGER 182.05 0.00 182.05 32.30 0.00 32.30 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 51,693.28- 0.00 553,589.90 0.00 4,625.77- 0.00 48,572.01 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 501.22 2.00 2.00 51,693.28- 553,589.90 4,625.77- 48,572.01 545,842.86 0.00 448.50 0.00 448.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 448.50 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.00 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001777 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 593459VENDOR 167650 - L.B. SMITH INC. P86387044 521-122410-646425-00000 310050 PARTS AMT DISC 161 CHECK NO 593614 VENDOR 312940 - LANDSCAPE FLORIDA 20046091 ~US-FINAL 107666 TO 5/31/02 111-163646-763100-60039 20046091 ~ - RELEASE RETAINAGE 111-000000-205100-00000 107666 TO 5/31/02 RELEASE RETAINAGE NET VCHR DISC 1 CHECK NO 30000641 593430 VENDOR 135200 - LAWN EQUIPMENT CENTER 21821 310043 REPAIR CHAINSAW 30000643 21877 310043 REPAIR SPRAYER 30000643 21877 310043 REPAIR SPRAYER 30000645 51994 310043 EQUIPTMENT PARTS 30000641 21821 310043 REPAIR CHAINSAW 109-182901-634999-00000 109-182901-634999-00000 109-182901-652990-00000 109-182901-652990-00000 109-182901-652990-00000 ,PAGE 66 VCHR NET 0.00 46.42 0.00 46.42 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 46.42 14,135.69- 0.00 CHECK NO 30001747 593652 VENDOR 329400 - LAWSON PRODUCTS. INC. DISC 310138 OPERATION VOUCHER 30001747 185248 310138 OPERATION VOUCHER 30001747 DISC 310138 OPERATION VOUCHER 30001747 181011 310138 OPERATION VOUCHER 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 61.529.91 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 14,135.69- 61,529.91 47,394.22 0.00 67.50 0.00 67.50 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 223.56 0.00 223.56 0.00 35.84 0.00 35.84 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.28- 0.00 373.90 2.28- 0.00 492.63 0.00 492.63 0.00 4.83- 0.00 4.83- 0.00 233.42 0.00 233.42 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001747 30001751 30001747 DESCRIPTION DISC 310138 OPERATION VOUCHER 9640118 251226 NUTS, BOLTS. WASHERS 176766 310138 OPERATION VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001776 593490 VENDOR 201490 - LEADERSHIP DIRECTORIES INC. 242370-7 307-156111-766100-54001 311804 SUBSCRIPTION 0.00 CHECK NO 30000993 30000993 30001528 30000993 30000993 593364 VENDOR 11110 - LEE CO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 20195-101440 9/11 10/10 198-157440-643100-00000 20195-101440 9/11 10/10 20195-101180 9/11 10/10 001-156150-643100-00000 20195-101180 9/11 10/10 20195-110589 10/30/02 470-173442-643100-00000 20195-110589 10/30/02 20195-145917 9/03 10/03 001-155410-643100-00000 20195-145917 9/03 10/03 20195-101183 9/11 10/10 001-156150-643100-00000 20195-101183 9/11 10/10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001520 30001519 593594 VENDOR 290080 - LENNAR HOMES. INC 365806 LENNAR FAMILY 113-000000-115420-00000 LENNAR FAMILY 365806 365885 LENNAR FAMILY 113-000000-115420-00000 LENNAR FAMILY 365885 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 430122 593788 VENDOR 900050 - LENNAR HOMES, INC 366235 LENRAR HOMES 113-000000-115420-00000 366235 LENNAR HOMES 0.00 161 AMT NET 0.34- 856.50 34.25 CHECK TOTAL 340.00 CHECK TOTAL 47.17 2.502.54 139.88 24.95 512.46 CHECK TOTAL 49.33 6.98 CHECK TOTAL 4.00 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 0.34- 856.50 34.25 1,609.35 340.00 340.00 47.17 2.502.54 139.88 24.95 512.46 3.227.00 49.33 6.98 56.31 4.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AFfr DISC CHECK NO 30001858 30001855 593760 VENDOR 366370 - LEO GUTIERREZ 11/2-8/02 P/D T.b~ALSH 11/2-8/02 P/D T.WALSH 11/3-8/02 P/D L.GUTIERREZ 11/3-8/02 P/D L. GUTIERREZ 412-273512-640300-70124 0.00 412-273512-640300-70124 0.00 CHECK NO 30001532 593365 VENDOR 9251 310250 SOD 11240 - LEO'S SOD & LANDSCAPING 408-253212-646314-00000 CHECK NO 30000642 593397 VENDOR 105260 - LESCO SERVICE CENTER 2B2ZAO 109-182602-652990-00000 310063 INJECT SPPJkY AM1- NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001770 30001770 593704 VENDOR 356230 - LEXISNEXIS MAll-HEW BENDER 4995217X 307-156111-766100-54001 311599 FL EMPTY 49952188 307-156111-766100-54001 311599 FL EMPTY PAGE VCHR NET 4.00 CHECK NO 430124 593789 VENDOR 900050 - LISA ACEVEDO 2002022786 LISA ACEVEDO 2002022786 LISA ACEVEDO 111-138317-322530-00000 126.00 0.00 126.00 CHECK NO 30001761 593689 VENDOR 351180 - M/A-COM PRS, INC 90162175 101-163640-634999-00000 251136 INSTALLATION VEHICLE CHARGER 126.00 0.00 126.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 252.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.00 0.00 17.10 0.00 17.10 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 17.10 0.00 96.85 0.00 96.85 0.00 96.85 0.00 96.85 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 193.70 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 35.00 0.00 209.00 0.00 209.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 209.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 593676 VENDOR 343930 - M/A-COM RADIO SYSTEMS 30001759 90147884 251013 REPROGRAM RADIO 408-210125-646610-00000 161 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 593639 20045880 00014-02 200013 9/20-30/02 30001637 00001-03 200013 10/1-8/02 30001637 00001-03 311577 10/1-8/02 VENDOR 322920 - MAGGIE MCCARTY 194-101540-882100-10275 194-101540-882100-10275 194-101540-882100-00000 194-101540-882100-10275 PAGE VCHR NET 0.00 37.50 0.00 37.50 CHECK NO 30001746 20003 250799 DELIVERY 30001746 20003 250799 DELIVERY 30001746 20003 250799 DELIVERY 593580 VENDOR 280100 - MAIL STATION COURIER 408-233312-649990-00000 408-233352-649990-00000 408-233351-649990-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 37.50 0.00 663.12 0.00 663.12 0.00 0,00 0.00 23.90 0.00 CHECK NO 30001643 593670 VENDOR 340980 - MALCOLM PIRNIE 100015307/14520 106856 8/10-9/6102 413-263611-631400-73949 414-263611-631400-73949 413-263613-631400-73949 414-263614-631400-73949 23.90 CHECK NO 30001531 593394 VENDOR 100800 - MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 30076432 408-210152-634999-00000 311198 SECRETARY 0.00 710.81 0,00 710.81 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,397.83 0.00 103.33 0.00 103.33 0.00 103.33 0.00 103.33 0.00 103.34 0.00 103.34 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 310.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,601.54 1,837.30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21,438.84 21,438.84 0.00 811.44 0.00 811.44 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 811.44 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001529 30001522 DESCRIPTION 593559 VENDOR 267060 - MARCIA GALLE 10/1-29/02 311484 DANCE 10/1-29/02 10-16-02 310776 DANCE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET 111-156395-634999-00000 0.00 111-156390-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001433 30001521 30001427 30001750 30001435 30001524 30001432 30000999 30001430 30001523 30001434 30001428 30001774 593422 210080635 310440 SUPPLIES 210140042 311550 SUPPLIES 210150512 310064- 10/02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 209180505 251223 PAPER INV 210080665 310385 SUPPLIES 210110596 311248 PAPER 210040654 310163 PAPER 210020510 311562 SUPPLIES 210010710 310996 SUPPLIES 20970509 310996 PAPER 210080672 310420 SUPPLIES 210080610 CREDIT 210020568 310937 CASSETTE VENDOR 127090 - MARCO OFFICE SUPPLY 114-178967-651110-00000 0.00 001-156363-647110-00000 0.00 109-182601-651110-00000 0.00 521-122410-651110-00000 0.00 114-178975-651110-00000 0.00 681-410710-651110-00000 0.00 408-210105-651110-00000 0.00 408-210151-652990-00000 0.00 101-163612-651110-00000 0.00 126-138332-651110-35000 0.00 114-178970-651110-00000 0.00 681-421510-651110-00000 0.00 681-421510-651110-00000 0.00 809.90 1,097.52 CHECK TOTAL 132.50 1,854. O0 97.33 71.97 583.62 89.90 71.97 350.40 391.56 35.98 140.47 5.90- 43.20 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 809.90 1.097.52 1,907.42 132.50 1,854. O0 97.33 71.97 583.62 89.90 71.97 350.40 391.56 35.98 140.47 5.90- 43.20 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001435 30001527 30001525 30001436 30001431 30001428 30001523 30001435 30001429 30001427 30001437 DESCRIPTION 209170523 310385 SUPPLIES 209230632 311027 PAPER 210030618 310383 SUPPLIE 209270600 310858 CRTRDG 210030502 310494 SUPPLIES 210110592 310937 SUPPLIES 20970509 310996 PAPER 2091650519 310385 SUPPLIES 21070506 310016 SUPPLIES 210150512 310064- 10/02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 210080636 310450 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 114-178975-651110-00000 0.00 001-122310-651110-00000 0.00 408-233350-651110-00000 0.00 312-163615-651110-00000 0.00 681-431310-651110-00000 0.00 681-421510-651110-00000 0.00 101-163612-651110-00000 0.00 114-178975-651110-00000 0.00 111-138317-651110-00000 0.00 109-182900-651110-00000 0.00 114-178969-651110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30000641 30000531 30000641 30000641 30000641 593417 10/08/02 DELASHMET DELASHMET 8:30 3:30 10/02/02 DELASHMET MARIA DELASHMET .5 HOURS 10/4/02 DELASHMET DELASHMET 8-1 5 HR 10/4/02 DELASHMET DELASHMET 1- 3:30 2.5 HOURS 10/7/02 DELESHMET 8-11 1- 3:30 DELASHMET VENDOR 122850 - MARIA G. DELASHMET 681-421190-634402-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 45.98 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 45.98 57.80 0.00 57.80 99.73 0.00 99.73 316,00 0.00 316,00 12.98 0.00 12.98 41.68 0.00 41.68 35.99 0.00 35.99 190.40 0.00 190.40 117.95 0.00 117.95 97.34 0.00 97.34 79.27 0.00 79.27 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,952.12 0.00 96.00 0.00 96.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 88.00 0.00 88.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0,00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 80,00 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30000531 30000531 30000641 30000641 DESCRIPTION 10/01/02 DELASHMET MARIA DELASHMET 8-4 7.5 HOURS 10/02/02 DELASHMET MARIA DELASHMET 7,5 HOURS 10/3/02 DELASHMET DELASHMET 8-3 7 HOURS 10/7/02 DELASHMET DELASHMET 12-1 i HOUR COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001526 593711 VENDOR 358810 MARIA PIA GOOCH 10/02/02 MAIRIA PIA GOOCH 681-421190-634402-00000 MARIA PIA GOOCH 10/02/02 161 1 CHECK NO 30001763 593420 VENDOR 126700 MARINE LUMBER SUPPLY, INC. 187218 111-156332-652990-00000 LUMBER FOR BOAT RACK AT SUGEN PARK AMT NET VCHR DISC 120.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001753 593663 VENDOR 334100 MARK E. PETRITES, MD 01426 001-155930-631210-00000 251255 PRO SERV JUSTIN A HOGAN PAGE CHECK NO 430125 593790 VENDOR 900050 MARK LORI AND BENEDICT MARK BENEDICT REFUND ADOP 001-155410-346410-00000 MARK BENEDICT REFUND ADOPTION VCHR NET 120.00 CHECK NO 593657 VENDOR 331580 30001633 9/5 TRVL REIMB M.FOORD 9/5 TRVL REIMB M.FOORD MARLENE FOORD 001-121151-640300-00000 120.00 0.00 120.00 CHECK NO 593743 VENDOR 365900 MAUREEN & JACK TYBURSKI 112.00 0.00 112.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 CHECK TOTAL 0,00 680.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 425.55 0.00 425.55 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 425.55 0.00 341.25 0.00 341.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 341.25 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 0.00 55.00 0,00 55.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 55.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001767 DESCRIPTION 10/04/02 358270 250294 10-04-02 358270 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430127 593791 VENDOR 900050 · MAYKEL CONSTANTIN M CONSTANTIN REFUND PARKS 670-000000-220010-00000 M CONSTANTIN REFUND PARKS 16¸! CHECK NO 30001752 593366 VENDOR 12200 - MCCONNELLS TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 172615 521-122410-646425-00000 251224 BOLTS SCREWS NUTS AMT NET VCHR DISC 95.80 0.00 CHECK NO 30001670 593719 VENDOR 360280 - MCI 4DR07836 10/11/02 4DR07836 10/11/02 113-138900-641700-00000 1 CHECK NO 30000933 30001642 30000933 593496 VENDOR 204140 - METCALF & EDDY INC. 169009 917436 TO 9/30/02 411-273511-631400-70054 169253 502882 TO 9/20/02 412-273511-631400-70859 411-273511-631400-70859 412-273511-631400-70887 412-273511-631400-70890 412-273512-631400-70859 412-273512-631400-70890 169051 917436 TO 9/30/02 411-273511-631400-70054 PAGE VCHR NET 95.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 95.80 CHECK NO 30001810 593633 VENDOR 318910 - MICHAEL T. HAVIG. MD SHEPARD S 9-17-02 001-155930-631210-00000 251256 SHEPARD S 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 50.00 0.00 10.80 0.00 10.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.80 0.00 24.15 0.00 24.15 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 141,905.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,067.49 0.00 0.00 26,058.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 24.15 141.905,80 22,067.49 26.058.72 190,032.01 0.00 48.75 0.00 48.75 CHECK TOTAL 0,00 48.75 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001768 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 593733VENDOR 365260 - MIFFLIN VALLEY, INC. 0028450-IN 144-144360-652110-00000 250812 GEAR AND UNIFORMS AMT DISC 161 AMI' NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30001530 593554 VENDOR 264410 - MILER TRONICS 100202MT 311707 MAINTENANCE 495-192370-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001807 30001807 593755 VENDOR 366190 - MILNER-FENWICK, INC. DIABETES EDUCATION 517-121640-652990-00000 251288 DIABETES EDUCATION DIABETES EDUCATION 517-121640-641950-00000 251288 DIABETES EDUCATION PAGE VCHR NET 0.00 70.21 0.00 70.21 CHECK NO 30001846 593576 VENDOR 278600 - MOHAN THAMPI 10/6-8/02 P/D M.TFLAMPI 10/6-8/02 P/D M.THAMPI 408-210155-640300-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 70.21 CHECK NO 593410 VENDOR 115710 - MR JAMES NOE II TRUST 30001835 0CT-2002 SHERIFF 001-106010-644100-00000 0CT-2002 312216 834.50 0.00 834.50 CHECK NO 30001760 30001760 593367 VENDOR 12960 - MUNICIPAL CODE CORP 304715 408-210111-654110-00000 250782 SUBSCRIPTION 304803 408-210111-654110-00000 250782 SUBSCRIPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 834.50 0.00 299.00 0.00 299.00 CHECK NO 593368 VENDOR 13000 - MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & SIGN CO 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 309.00 0.00 36.00 0.00 36.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 36.00 4,458.33 O. O0 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 4,458.33 4,458.33 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 215.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 85.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001762 DESCRIPTION 4201 250075 ORANGE BUMPER MARKERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156363-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001253 30001278 593413 10181 BALANCE 251149 BAL INV 10181 001 00000 11229 GTS 311358 9/19-20/02 GTS VENDOR 118880 - NABORS, GIBLIN, & NICKERSON, P.A. 001-100510-634999-00000 0.00 001-100520-631100-00000 0.00 001-100510-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001279 593631 VENDOR 318840 - NAPLES ARMATURE 68096 408-233352-652910-00000 310656 SUPPLIES 0,00 CHECK NO 593369 VENDOR 13080 - NAPLES ARMATURE WORKS 30001585 64058 101-163628-652990-00000 312001 GLOVES 30001387 68350 001-122240-652991-00000 251113 PHOTOCELL 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 593370 VENDOR 30001280 CAR WASH 9/02 310046 9/02 13200 - NAPLES CAR WASH 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001700 30001700 30001700 593371 E ANDERSON 8/26 312062 E ANDERSON 8/26 A HAMPSON 8/1-31/02 312062 A HAMPSON 8/1-31/02 S NOWAKOWSKI 6/19-30/02 312062 S NOWAKOWSKI 6/19-30/02 VENDOR 13230 - NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 001-155930-634101-00000 001-155930-634101-00000 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 564.00 CHECK TOTAL 34.81 385.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 12.50 CHECK TOTAL 22.95 79.50 CHECK TOTAL 931,75 CHECK TOTAL 55.18 201.50 1,091.50 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 564.00 564.00 34.81 385.00 419.81 12.50 12.50 22.95 79.50 102.45 931.75 931.75 55.18 201.50 1,091.50 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001700 30001700 30001700 30001700 30001700 30001700 DESCRIPTION D ANZUALDA 8/31 312062 D ANZUALDA 8/31 S NOWAKOWSKI 7/1-8/02 312062 S NOWAKOWSKI 7/1-8/02 2 LOT~ANO 2/28 312062 J LOZANO 2/28 I FRAGOSO 8/20-31/02 312062 I FRAGOSO 8/20-31/02 D BONETA 7/22 312062 D BONETA 7/22 D ANZUALDA 9/02 312062 D ANZUALDA 9/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001268 593549 VENDOR 259460 - NAPLES COURT REPORTING, INC. 9102 681-410310-633031-00000 R KUHNS SR 01-1812 CHECK NO 30001569 30001264 30001569 30001281 30001281 30001281 30001569 593409 56395 251203 PARTS 56698 250789 CONNECTOR DEVICES 56367 251203 PARTS 56523 310116 PARTS 56491 310116 PARTS 56393 310116 PARTS 56394 251203 PARTS VENDOR 115170 - NAPLES CUSTOM HITCH & TRAILER SALES 521-122410-646425-00000 111-163647-652990-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 52.83 0,00 593.75 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 52.83 593.75 384.50 0.00 384.50 211.00 0.00 211.00 107.60 0.00 107.60 76.96 0.00 76.96 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,774.82 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 45.00 0.00 69.97 0.00 69.97 0.00 25.35 0.00 25.35 0.00 27.54 0.00 27.54 0.00 55.22 0.00 55.22 0.00 40.50 0.00 40.50 0.00 57.54 0.00 57,54 0.00 7.20- 0.00 7,20- OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001493 30001584 30001274 30001274 30001567 30001385 30001274 30001274 30001567 30001584 593372 VENDOR 2103817/1230 311581 AD 2103852/057522 206393 ADS 47242 311805 SUBSCRIPTIONS 42659 311805 SUBSCRIPTIONS 2101775/029507 312114 AD 2080547/1230 311648 AGENDA 45099 311805 SUBSCRIPTIONS 185349 311805 SUBSCRIPTIONS 2101776/029507 312114 AD 2103932/057522 206393 ADS 13300 - NAPLES DAILY NEWS 111-100130-649100-00000 161 ~ NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 ' PAGE VCHR NET 268.92 0.00 95.63 0.00 95.63 126-138332-649100-35000 0.00 001-156130-652650-00000 0.00 001-156130-652650-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001699 30001699 30001699 30001699 593692 T VANWINKLE 9/17 312063 T VANWINKLE 9/17 A NOWAK 9/13 312063 A NOWAK 9/13 T VANWINKLE 9/5 312063 T VANWINKLE 9/5 T VANWINKLE 9/3 312063 T VANWINKLE 9/3 495-192310-648160-00000 0.00 75.24 0.00 75.24 111-100130-648160-00000 0.00 001-156130-652650-00000 0.00 001-156130-652650-00000 0.00 190.19 0.00 190.19 190.19 0.00 190.19 28.80 0.00 28.80 307.40 0.00 307.40 190.19 0.00 190.19 190.19 0.00 190.19 28.80 0.00 28.80 75.24 0.00 75.24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,371.87 495-192310-648160-00000 0.00 126-138332-649100-35000 0.00 VENDOR 352210 - NAPLES DAY SURGERY, LLC 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 351.00 0.00 351.00 1,307.80 0.00 1,307.80 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 520.00 0.00 520.00 520.00 0.00 520.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001699 30001699 DESCRIPTION T VANWINKLE 9/10 312063 T VANWINKLE 9/10 C DAVIS 9/11 312063 C DAVIS 9/11 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001239 593546 VENDOR 257050 - NAPLES DERMATOLOGY, P.A. J MARTINEZ 9/19/02 001-155930-631210-00000 251257 J MARTINEZ 9/19/02 CHECK NO 30001698 30001698 30001698 30001698 30001698 593373 J MARTINEZ 9/12 312064 ~ MARTINEZ 9/12 M SIMONISE 8/2 312064 M SIMONISE 8/2 T NUNEZ 9/6 312064 T NUNEZ 9/6 I BATALLAN 8/30 312064 I BATALLAN 8/30 H MANCMA 8/16 312064 H MANCHA VENDOR 13340 - NAPLES DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 520.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 520.00 520.00 0.00 520.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001255 593464 VENDOR 174250 - NAPLES ENGRAVING 12514 681-421510-652990-00000 250955 PROPERTY TAGS 3,738.80 CHECK NO 30001593 30001592 30001244 593374 17247 251289 SUPPLIES 17252 251290 CAT FOOD 17241 251174 FEED VENDOR 13370 - NAPLES FEED & SEED, INC. 001-155410-652210-00000 001-155410-652210-00000 001-155410-652210-00000 0.00 126.60 0.00 126.60 O.O0 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 126.60 1,768.00 0.00 1,768.00 0.00 325.00 0.00 325.00 0.00 845.00 0.00 845.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 55.90 0.00 55.90 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,058.90 0.00 248.20 0.00 248.20 0.00 99.90 0.00 99.90 0.00 221.64 0.00 221.64 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER.29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 3O001568 593486 VENDOR 197570 - NAPLES GRAPHICS & PRINTING, INC. 40516 251457 NEWSLETTER BENEFITS 30001258 40425 250908 PRINTING CARDS 30001395 517-121640-647110-00000 001-156175-647110-00000 40540 251398 GUEST PASS/OLD FL FESTIVAL 198-157410-647110-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 569.74 CHECK NO 593401 30001697 S NOW~J(OWSKI 9/6 312068 S NOWAKOWSKI 9/6 30001697 G TOWNSEND 9/16 312068 G TOWNSEND 9/16 30001697 S BECERRA 7/31,8/23-27 312068 S BECERRA 7/31. 8/23-27/02 30001697 G TOWNSEND 9/16 312068 G TOWNSEND 9/16 30001697 S NOWAKOWSKI 9/20 312068 S NOWAKOWSKI 9/20 30001697 A MCGEE 9/18/02 312068 A MCGEE 9/18/02 30001697 S BECERRA 8/1-4/02 312068 S BECERRA 8/1-4/02 30001697 S BECERRA 8/1/02 312068 S BECERRA 8/1/02 30001697 D PRIEST 9/18 312068 D PRIEST 9/18 30001697 G TOWNSEND 9/6 312068 G TOWNSEND 9/6 VENDOR 108550 - NAPLES MEDICAL CENTER 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 657.89 0.00 657.89 0.00 203.00 0.00 203.00 0.00 234.66 0.00 234.66 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,095.55 0.00 61.75 0.00 61.75 0.00 52.65 0.00 52.65 0.00 500.50 0.00 500.50 0.00 206.70 0.00 206.70 0.00 61.75 0.00 61.75 CHECK NO 593400 VENDOR 107670 - NAPLES PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES 0.00 113.75 0.00 113.75 0.00 240.50 0.00 240.50 0.00 105.30 0.00 105.30 0.00 55.25 0.00 55.25 1,647.10 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,647.10 3,045.25 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001588 30001588 30001588 30001588 DESCRIPTION M SIMONISE 8/26 312069 M SIMONISE 8/26 D ANZUALDA 8/27, 8/30 312069 D ANZUALDA 8/27, 8/30 E VEGA 5/14 312069 E VEGA 5/14 J HOUSE 8/9 312069 J HOUSE 8/9 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001252 593375 VENDOR 13690 - NAPLES PRINTING COMPANY 043135 001-121810-647110-00000 251269 POST CARDS CHECK NO 30001696 593320 VENDOR 13700 - NAPLES RADIOLOGISTS D CRUSE 1/22-1/30/02 001-155930-631990-00000 AND AMT NET VCHR DISC 143.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001694 30001694 30001694 30001694 30001694 30001694 30001694 593376 VENDOR E ROSAS 8/07 312070 E ROSAS 8/07 E ROSAS 7/13 312070 E ROSAS 7/13 H MANCHA 8/17-26/02 312070 H MANCHA 8/17-26/02 S ELDRIDGE 8/05 312070 S ELDRIDGE 8/05 J HOUSE 8/9. 8/12 312070 J HOUSE 8/9, 8/12 G DESIR 9/03 312070 G DESIR 9/03 J SIMMONS 8/20/02 312070 J SIMMONS 8/20 13700 - NAPLES RADIOLOGISTS 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 PAGE VCHR NET 143.00 21.17 0.00 21.17 16.25 0.00 16.25 52.00 0.00 52.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 232.42 0.00 226.00 0.00 226.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 226.00 0.00 1,127.75 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,127.75 1,127.75 O.OO 165.75 0.00 165.75 0.00 386.75 0.00 386.75 0.00 253.50 0.00 253.50 0.00 117.00 0.00 117.00 0.00 269.75 0.00 269.75 0.00 35.75 0.00 35.75 0.00 185.25 0.00 185.25 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 30001694 30001694 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30001694 OTIS TURNER 8/31-9/2 312070 0 TURNER 8/31-9/2 L CROSBY 9/02 312070 L CROSBY 9/02 S ELDRIDGE 5/20 312070 S ELDRIDGE 5/20 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631990-00000 0,00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001282 30001282 593636 VENDOR 319080 - NAPLES SAFARI ANIMAL HOSPITAL L BUBER 02-10047 610-155413-631970-00000 311685 L BUBER 02-10047 L BUBER 02-10048 610-155413-631970-00000 311685 L BUBER 02-10048 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001283 30001283 593717 VENDOR 359990 - NAPLES TRUCK PARTS 276 521-122410-646425-00000 310140 TRUCK PARTS 281 521-122410-646425-00000 310140 TRUCK PARTS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 593691 VENDOR 352050 - NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR STORAGE TANK 30001384 REG 10/24,25 DOVE.CALLIS 001-122240-654370-00000 250410 REGIST 10/24,25 R.DOVE,M CALL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001256 593563 VENDOR 272820 - NATIONS RENT OF FLORIDA, INC. 35-1165964 408-233312-644600-00000 250221 STREET SWEEPER 0.00 CHECK NO 30001243 593690 VENDOR 351790 - NCS PEARSON INCORPORATED 3123487/3 517-121640-649990-00000 251140 MAINT 0.00 AMT NET 341.25 139.75 22.75 CHECK TOTAL 45.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 192.23 734.20 CHECK TOTAL 500.00 CHECK TOTAL 182.50 CHECK TOTAL 216.00 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 341.25 139.75 22.75 1,917.50 45.00 60.00 105.00 192.23 734.20 926.43 500.00 500.00 182.50 182.50 216.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001693 30001693 30001693 30001693 30001693 30001693 30001693 30001693 30001693 593531 S NIESEN 9/20 312071 S NIESEN 9/20 S NIESEN 9/9 312071S NIESEN 9/9 T LONGORIA 9/4 312071 T LONGORIA 9/4 C NEWCOMB 9/12 312071 C NEWCOMB 9/12 M CHRISTOPHER 9/11 312071 M CHRISTOPHER 9/11 E ROSAS 9/6 312071 E ROSAS 9/6 C NEWCOMB 9/5 312071 C NEWCOMB 9/5 S POWELL 8/29 312071 S POWELL 8/29 T LONGORIA 9/4 312071 T LONGORIA 9/4 VENDOR 248010 - NEUROSCIENCE & SPINE ASSOCIATION 001-155930-631210-00000 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,,~ PAGE VCHR NET 216.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 130.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001494 30001604 30001275 30001276 30001500 593590 VENDOR 286930 - NEXTEL 666517413-008 9/15-10/14 666517413-008 9/15-10/14 311423 608547417-007 8/15-9/14 608547417-007 8/15-9/14 311908 364858415-007 8/25-9/24 364858415-007 8/25-9/24 310373 70793419-008 9/15-10/14 70793419-008 9/15-10/14 311255 544365411-008 9/15-10/14 544365411-008 9/15-10/14 311211 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-121810-649990-00000 0.00 001-144510-641700-00000 0.00 146-144380-641700-00000 0.00 286.65 0.00 286.65 898.95 0.00 898.95 345.80 0.00 345.80 130.00 0.00 130.00 106.60 0.00 106.60 345.80 0.00 345.80 724.10 0.00 724.10 130.00 0.00 130.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,097.90 111.38 0.00 111.38 70.79 0.00 70.79 59.32 0.00 59.32 137.08 198.15 0.00 518-121630-641700-00000 0.00 516-121650-641700-00000 0.00 408-210130-641700-00000 0.00 1,109.40 0.00 335.23 1,109.40 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001408 30001411 30001604 30001500 30001277 DESCRIPTION 544365411-007 8/15-9/14 544365411-007 8/15-9/14 310544 801245412-008 9/15-10/14 801245412-008 9/15-10/14 311395 608547417-008 9/15-10/14 608547417-008 9/15-10/14 544365411-008 9/15-10/14 544365411-008 9/15-10/14 310544 147347417-007 9/7-10/6 147347417-007 9/7-10/6 311621 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233351-641700-00000 0.00 408-210120-641700-00000 0.00 001-122240-641700-00000 0.00 001-144510-641700-00000 0.00 408-233351-641700-00000 0.00 408-210120-641700-00000 0.00 118-144211-634999-34300 0.00 CHECK NO 30001267 593625 VENDOR 316250 - NEXTEL 627335411-008 9/15-10/14 627335411-008 9/15-10/14 311680 470-173410-641700-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430113 593792 VENDOR 900050 - NICOLE ANDERSON BOOK REFUND-N ANDERSON 001-156110-347110-00000 N ANDERSON BOOK REFUND CHECK NO 30001800 30001801 593703 VENDOR 355790 - NORMAN FEDER 10/9-10/02 P/D N.FEDER 10/9-10/02 P/D N.FEDER 10/3-7/02 TRVL N.FEDER 10/3-7/02 TRVL N.FEDER 101-163609-640300-00000 101-163609-640300-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1,106.84 73.33 0.00 1,358.59 0.00 CHECK NO 30001272 30001272 593377 VENDOR 14060 - NORTH COLLIER ANIMAL CLINIC A ST LOUIS 02-10378 610-155413-631970-00000 311480 A ST LOUIS 02-10378 S BROUNCE 02-10371 610-155413-631970-00000 311480 S BROUNCE 02-10371 VCHR NET 1,180.17 1,358.59 63.79 0.00 63.79 1.213.73 51.71 0.00 1,265.44 154.20 0.00 154.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,708.31 427.12 0.00 427.12 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 427.12 0.00 4.99 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4.99 4.99 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 149.00 0.00 116.00 0.00 116.00 0.00 33.00 0.00 33.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001284 593647 VENDOR 326790 - NORTH NAPLES VETERINARY HOSPITAL M BARKER 02-10638 610-155413-631970-00000 311686 M BARKER 02-10638 161 1 CHECK NO 30001242 593511 VENDOR 226410 - NOTARY PUBLIC UNDERWRITERS INC. C MARTIN - NOTARY 113-138312-649990-00000 251286 C MARTIN - NOTARY AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 30001238 593452 VENDOR 162490 - OFFICE DEPOT 6932 10/17 250050 PRINTER 301-120435-762200-52001 VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 30001273 593696 VENDOR 354290 - OLDE NAPLES SELF STORAGE 02004 RENT 310860 RENTAL 312-163615-644170-00000 101-163612-644170-00000 VCHR NET 110.00 CHECK NO 30001285 30001595 593447 VENDOR 157710 - ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY INC. 450033337-01 130-157710-652990-00000 310531 SUPPLIES 451271258-01 111-156349-652990-00000 250180 SUPPLIES 0.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001410 593682 VENDOR 345910 - OUTSIDE AIR SOLUTIONS, INC. 1047 001-122240-652997-00000 312014 INSP/SVS CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 593577 VENDOR 279400 - P&W SERVICE CENTER 15.00 0.00 93.00 0.00 93.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 93.00 0.00 399.99 0.00 399.99 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 399.99 0.00 94.50 0.00 94.50 0.00 189.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 189.00 0.00 298.02 0.00 298.02 0.00 148.45 0.00 148.45 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 446.47 0.00 3,097.94 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,097.94 3,097.94 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001391 DESCRIPTION 21236 250923 MONITOR 4-ONE CHANNEL COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 146-144380-641150-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001263 593680 VENDOR 345120 - PAIN ENTERPRISES, INC. A1373149 111-156313-652311-00000 250127 C02 16i 1 CHECK NO 30001587 30001587 30001587 30001587 593509 #910 - B ROGACKA 10/9 312072 B ROGACKA 10/9 #910 - D WARREN 10/01 312072 D WARREN 10/01 #910 - H HESTER 10/14 312072 H HESTER 10/14 #910 - S LEVENSON 9/23 312072 S LEVENSON 9/23 VENDOR 224590 - PALM MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP. 001-155930-652810-00000 001-155930-652810-00000 001-155930-652810-00000 001-155930-652810-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 338.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 338.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 338.00 CHECK NO 30001397 593504 VENDOR 216160 - PARAGON ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS 1849 495-192370-646970-00000 251296 LABOR/REPAIR SECURITY CAMERAS 0.00 244.43 0.00 244.43 CHECK NO 30001827 593745 VENDOR 365950 - PARRISH, WHITE, ET AL & RYAN MOODY D/P RMOODY 66260001647 191-138785-884100-44200 6620001647 RMOODY 312138 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 244.43 CHECK NO 430116 430117 593793 VENDOR 900050 - PATRICIA GENSLER REFUND ADOPT-P GENSLER 001-155410-346410-00000 P GENSLER - REFUND ADOPT REFUND ADOPT-P GENSLER 610-155410-346450-00000 P GENSLER - REFUND ADOPT 0.00 295.72 0.00 295.72 0.00 220.10 0.00 220.10 0.00 52.80 0.00 52.80 0.00 146.94 0.00 146.94 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 715.56 0.00 206.63 0.00 206.63 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 206.63 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,500.00 2.500.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 PAGE REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001388 30001254 30001248 30001572 30001250 30001389 30001386 593529 VENDOR 247350 - PEDERSEN PRINTING 1722 113-138312-647210-00000 0.00 250618 BUS CARDS - M SAWYER 1730 251137 BUS CARDS MITCH RILEY 1728 250775 BUS CARDS - KII-FY EDMONDS 1737 251468 BUS CARDS D FLAGG, B NIEVES 1723 250324 BUS CARDS FRANK INZANO 1724 250522 BUS CARDS -D ROLL 1732 250851 BUS CARDS - J SNYDER 101-163640-647110-00000 0.00 408-210111-647110-00000 0.00 101-163612-647110-00000 0,00 408-210155-647110-00000 0.00 113-138320-647110-00000 0.00 001-155910-647110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001240 593547 VENDOR 257160 - PHILIP T. REGALA. M.D. B DRILICH CL#002240 001-155930-631210-00000 251258 B DRILICH 9/11/02 161 CHECK NO 30001691 593405 VENDOR 110100 - PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY 632 814 709 2 10/16 001-144510-652410-00000 311967 10/16 FUEL AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001286 30001286 30001286 593624 K GOMEZ 02-10804 311516 K GOMEZ 02-10804 02-10691L ROBINSON 311516 02-10691 L ROBINSON 02-10403 M KOCHER 311516 02-10403 M KOCHER VENDOR 316240 - PINEGATE VETERINARY CENTER 610-155413-631970-00000 610-155413-631970-00000 610-155413-631970-00000 1 VCHR NET 50.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 38.00 0.00 38.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 248.00 0.00 150.80 0.00 150.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.80 1,106.96 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,106.96 1,106.96 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 O.O0 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001286 30001286 30001286 30001286 30001286 30001286 30001286 30001286 30001286 30001286 30001286 DESCRIPTION 02-10642 MASTIFF RESCUE 311516 02-10642 MASTIFF RESCUE 02-10639 BOLEN RESCUE 311516 02-10639 BOLEN RESCUE 02-9622 L GLIVIC 311516 02-9622 L GLIVIC 02-10532 BOLEN RESCUE 311516 02-10532 BOLEN RESCUE 02-10341 D FLOYD 311516 02-10341 D FLOYD 02-10638 M BARKER 311516 02-10638 M BARKER 02-10640 BOLEN RESCUE 311516 02-10640 BOLEN RESCUE 02-10645 BOLEN RESCUE 311516 02-10645 BOLEN RESCUE 02-10690 L ROBINSON 311516 02-10690 L ROBINSON 02-10540 C CAGATA 311516 C CAGATA 02-10540 A FERREP~A 02-9851 311516 A FERRERA 02-9851 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 610-155413-631970-00000 O.O0 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 610-155413-631970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593551 30001287 260844 310143 PARTS 30001287 260836 310143 PARTS 30001287 260841 310143 PARTS VENDOR 260210 - PIONEER-KAISER INC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593381 VENDOR 15030 - PLASTIC SPECIALTIES OF FL AMT NET 75.00 75.00 75.00 75. O0 60.00 75.00 65.00 65.00 75.00 75. O0 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 89.60 141.55 202.10 CHECK TOTAL 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 60.00 75.00 65.00 65.00 75.00 75, O0 75.00 985.00 89.60 141.55 202.10 433.25 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001390 DESCRIPTION 8859 250424 DESK COVERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001426 30001426 30001426 30001426 30001426 593621 VENDOR 315440 - PLUMBMASTER 51380621 311390 SUPPLIES 51386009 311390 SUPPLIES 51361069 311390 SUPPLIES 51382085 311390 SUPPLIES 51382084 311390 SUPPLIES 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001499 593512 VENDOR 227890 - PMI IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC. 007199 001-156110-646710-00000 312152 MAINT 9/02-9/03 0.00 CHECK NO 30001690 593664 VENDOR 334800 - POLYDYNE, INC. 633044 408-253211-652310-00000 310188 POLYMER 0.00 CHECK NO 30001266 30001296 30001295 30001266 593543 PJ364163 310389 CYLINDER RENTAL PJ377314 310042 RENT WELDING TANK PJ391346 310578 SUPPLIES P3377315 310389 CYLINDER RENTAL VENDOR 255770 - PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST,LLC 114-178975-652910-00000 109-182901-644600-00000 408-233312-652990-00000 114-178975-652910-00000 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 110.00 0.00 PAGE 88 VCHR NET 110.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 110.00 1,322.20 0.00 1,784.85 0.00 1,322.20 1,784.85 943.58 0.00 943.58 497.05- 0.00 497.05- 557.40 0.00 557.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,272.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,200.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,110.98 1,272.00 1,272.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 0.00 275.00 0.00 275.00 0.00 7.99 0.00 7.99 0.00 77.92 0.00 77.92 0.00 25.15 0.00 25.15 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001293 30001294 30001295 30001266 DESCRIPTION P2377316 310144 PARTS PJ386405 310558 SUPPLIES P3377319 310578 SUPPLIES P3366842 310389 CYLINDER RENTAL COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 408-233351-652990-00000 0.00 408-233312-652990-00000 0.00 114-178975-652910-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001689 30001689 593449 VENDOR 159000 - PRECISION CLEANING INC. 7197 001-122220-634999-00000 310924 SVS 7186 001-122220-634999-00000 310924 SVS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 593466 30001570 0421182084 251228 BATTERIES 30001570 157481 251228 BATTERIES 30001571 157695 251229 BA1-FERIES 30001571 157679 251229 BATTERIES 30001571 0421182098 251229 BATTERIES 30001261 157861 250071 BATTERIES VENDOR 174760 - PROCRAFT BATTERIES 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001396 593550 VENDOR 259910 - PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGIES S186347-000 001-122310-641900-00000 250823 PHONE 0.00 AMT NET 0.00 54.05 30.05 5.26 182.50 CHECK TOTAL 617.82 562.46 CHECK TOTAL 282.75 180.80 87.35 42.09 235.44 192.68 CHECK TOTAL 678.00 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 54.05 30.05 5.26 182.50 657.92 617.82 562.46 1,180.28 282.75 180.80 87.35 42.09 235.44 192.68 1.021.11 678.00 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001392 30001262 DESCRIPTION S186001-000 250685 HEADSET/ADAPTER S185711-000 250338 PHONES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-121148-652910-00000 0.00 001-121148-641950-00000 0.00 101-163612-651910-00000 0.00 101-163612-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001260 593463 VENDOR 173650 - PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. S185440-000 001-122240-651910-00000 250611 DIS 161 1 CHECK NO 30001259 593645 VENDOR 325880 - PROSOURCE ONE 08009800 250015 HERBICIDE 109-182901-652310-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 275.00 8.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001288 593613 VENDOR 312210 - PROVIDENT CAPITOL GROUP. INC. 10051881 11/02 001-157110-644620-00000 311754 11/02 880.00 16.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001249 30001291 593448 VENDOR 158120 - PUBLIX #410 I04082438 10/18/02 250271 SUPPLIES I04082427 10/11 310844 SUPPLIES 408-253211-652990-00000 130-157710-652210-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 283.00 CHECK NO 30001290 30001290 593722 VENDOR 361000 - PUBLIX#781 I04082417 10/9 310842 SUPPLIES I04247362 10/10 310842 SUPPLIES 111-156395-652210-00000 111-156395-652210-00000 896.00 1,857.00 0.00 630.00 0.00 630.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 630.00 0.00 138.00 0.00 138.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 138.00 0.00 354.91 0.00 354.91 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 354.91 0.00 400.40 0.00 400.40 0.00 95.95 0.00 95.95 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 496.35 0.00 14.69 0.00 14.69 0.00 10.04 0.00 10.04 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 24.73 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 593436 30001596 323977 250133 REPAIR 30001594 325785 250132 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC VENDOR 144550 - PYRAMID II JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 111-156390-646970-00000 0.00 111-156313-652510-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001292 30001292 593492 VENDOR 202510 - PYRAMID II, INC. 324867 001-155410-652510-00000 311123 SUPPLIES 325259 001-155410-652510-00000 311123 SUPPLIES AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30001644 30001644 593695 VENDOR 354130 - QUALITY ENTERPRISES USA, INC. #3 195-116361-763100-90514 204957 TO 9/30/02 #3 - RETAINAGE 195-000000-205100-00000 204957 TO 9/30/02 - RETAINAGE VCHR NET 62.50 0.00 62,50 CHECK NO 30001265 30001265 593527 VENDOR 242000 - QUARTERMASTER P57448200001 251313 UNIFORMS P57444890001 251313 UNIFORMS 001-122255-652110-00000 001-122255-641951-00000 001-122255-652110-00000 001-122255-641951-00000 95.00 0.00 95.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 157.50 CHECK NO 30001561 30001561 593750 VENDOR 366090 - QUEST DIAGNOSTIC M CALANA 8/22/02 001-155930-631990-00000 251266 M CALANA 8/22/02 J MARTINEZ 9/11/02 001-155930-631990-00000 251266 J MARTINEZ 9/11/02 0.00 748.20 0.00 748.20 0.00 373.32 0.00 373.32 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 39,379.60 0.00 3,937.96- 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 133.85 0.00 10.50 0.00 1,121.52 39,379.60 3,937.96- 35,441.64 17.95 144.35 0.00 107.51 0.00 107.51 0.00 32.18 0.00 32.18 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 162.30 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 161 ~AGE VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 VCHR NET 139.69 CHECK NO 593495 30001695 12388 311388 VENDOR 202830 - QUICK KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES 001-122240-639965-00000 SVS 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30001695 12366 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 36.00 30001586 12294 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 0.67- 0.00 0.67- 30001695 12368 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 85.00 0.00 85.00 30001695 12346 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 380.00 0.00 380.00 30001695 12385 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 116.84 0.00 116.84 30001556 A12369 311176 SVS 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 2,111.20 0.00 2,111.20 30001586 12296 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 52.50 0.00 52.50 30001251 12386 251159 SVS 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 39.00 0.00 39.00 30001586 12292 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 0.58- 0.00 0.58- 30001695 12365 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 31.60 0.00 31.60 30001586 12297 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 3.40- 0.00 3.40- 30001586 12297 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 170.20 0.00 170.20 30001695 12367 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 183.90 0.00 183.90 30001695 12364 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 33.50 0.00 33.50 30001586 12292 311388 SVS 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 29.40 0.00 29.40 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001586 12294 311388 SVS 30001695 12387 311388 SVS 30001586 12293 311388 SVS 30001586 12295 311388 SVS 30001586 12293 311388 SVS 30001586 12295 311388 SVS 30001586 12296 311388 SVS 30001695 12377 311388 SVS 30001695 12376 311388 SVS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 001-122240-639965-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 593382 VENDOR 30001413 860608 311954 BOOKS 30001413 857683 311954 BOOKS 15690 - R. R. BOWKER 307-156111-766100-54001 0.00 307-156111-766100-54001 0.00 CHECK NO 593588 30001692 B MACIAS 8/29 312075 B MACIAS 8/29 30001692 G WEATHERLEY 8/12 312075 G WEATHERLEY 8/12 30001692 B HOLDER 8/19 312075 B HOLDER 8/19 VENDOR 285410 - P~qDIOLOGY REGIONAL CENTER 001-155930-631990-00000 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 33.80 0.00 PAGE 93 VCHR NET 33.80 87.90 0.00 87.90 26.10 0.00 26.10 0.30- 0.00 O. 52- O. O0 0.30- 0.52- 15.00 0.00 15.00 1.05- 0.00 1.05- 27.20 0.00 27.20 55.00 0.00 55.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,537.62 710.53 0.00 710.53 482.84 0.00 482.84 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,193.37 163.32 0.00 163.32 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 464.66 0.00 464.66 0.00 105.90 0.00 105.90 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001692 DESCRIPTION G WEATHERLEY 8/23 312075 G WEATHERLEY 8/23 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001383 30001382 593591 CON#228691 11/13-15 D.FIT 251309 C0N#228691 11/13-15 D.FITTS CON#228690 11/13-15 S.NAG 251308 C0NF#228690 11/13-15 S.NAGY VENDOR 288130 - RADISSON DEAUVILLE RESORT 408-233351-640300-00000 161 ANT NET VCHR DISC 464.66 0.00 CHECK NO 30001590 593731 VENDOR 364590 - RALPH GORTON 10/1-27/02 SKATING GORTON I0/1-27/02 SKATING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001591 593730 VENDOR 364580 - RAPRAEL GELIN 10/1-27/02 310794 10/1-27/02 GELIN 1 CHECK NO 430097 430133 593767 VENDOR 900030 - PAY DOVE 10/16-18/02 P/D R.DOVE 10/16-18/02 P/D R.DOVE 10/24,25/02 P/D R.DOVE 10/24,25/02 P/D R.DOVE PAGE VCHR NET 464.66 CHECK NO 30001834 1,198.54 0.00 157.00 0.00 157.00 CHECK NO 30001269 408-233351-640300-00000 0.00 111-156380-634999-00000 0.00 111-156380-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-654370-00000 0.00 157.00 0.00 157.00 001-122240-654370-00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 314.00 585.00 0.00 585.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 585.00 491.40 0.00 491.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 491.40 42.00 0.00 42.00 19.50 0.00 19.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 61.50 3,087.59 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 593712 VENDOR 359250 - RAYMOND PETERS, GUARDIAN OF THE 0CT-2002 001-106010-644100-00000 0CT-2002 312212 3,087.59 15730 - RECORDED BOOKS, LLC. 001-156110-652670-00000 593383 VENDOR 1578286 311753 TAPES 3,087.59 0.00 11.90 0.00 11.90 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001271 30001271 593567 132741 310563 ICE 131692 310563 ICE VENDOR 275110 - REDDY ICE CORPOP~qTION 408-233351-652990-00000 161 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 30001241 VCHR DISC 0.00 1 CHECK NO 30001393 PAGE VCHR NET 11.90 CHECK NO 430114 0.00 64.80 0.00 64.80 408-233351-652990-00000 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 CHECK NO 30001632 593414 VENDOR 119000 - RETINA CONSULTANTS OF S.W. FLORIDA R GARCIA 9/19/02 001-155930-631210-00000 251260 R GARCIA 9/19/02 0.00 593619 VENDOR 315150 - REXEL CONSOLIDATED 12-284294 001-122240-652991-00000 251115 CKT BRKR CHECK TOTAL 136.80 593794 VENDOR 900050 - RICARDO GOMEZ BOOK REFUND-R GOMEZ R GOMEZ BOOK REFUND 001-156110-347110-00000 0.00 55.25 0.00 55.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 55.25 0.00 32.66 0.00 32.66 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 32.66 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 CHECK TOTAL O.O0 10.00 593693 VENDOR 352480 - RICHARD ZYVOLOSKI 10/16-18/02 TRVL R.ZYVOLO 118-144211-640300-34300 10/16-18/02 TRVL R.ZYVOLOSKI 0.00 89.00 0.00 89.00 CHECK NO 593775 VENDOR 900040 - RITA & MARIA SANTOS 430118 06102621100 R SANTOS 408-253212-343320-00000 R SANTOS 2316 ANDREW DR A&B 430118 06102621100 R SANTOS 411-273511-343360-00000 R SANTOS 2316 ANDREW DR A&B CHECK TOTAL 0.00 89.00 0.00 554.00 0.00 554.00 4,075.00 0.00 0.00 4,075.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,629, O0 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001270 DESCRIPTION 593584 VENDOR 281860 - ROBBINS C4496-0902 311386 SVS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC TELECOMMUNICATIONS 001-122240-641150-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001414 30001414 593607 VENDOR 303240 - ROBERT FLINN RECORDS MGMT CENTER 0208-00051 8/02 001-122240-639964-00000 311385 FILE RETRIEVAL 8/02 0209-00051 9/02 001-122240-639964-00000 311385 FILE RETRIEVAL 9/02 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001635 593556 VENDOR 265210 - ROCKHURST COLLEGE CONTINUING CON#632760067-001K.GREIS 001-122240-654370-00000 251114 C0NF~32760067-001 10/23 K.GR 161 CHECK NO 593736 30001412 COL-S-08/09 311939 PARTS 30001412 COL-S-09/09 311939 PARTS 30001412 COL-S-06/06 311939 PARTS 30001412 COL-S-07/09 311939 PARTS 30001412 COL-SlO/IO 311939 PARTS 30001412 COL-S-05/05 311939 PARTS 30001412 COL-S-04/05 311939 PARTS VENDOR 365480 - ROLLSECURE SHU1-FERS, INC, 001-122240-646110-00000 001-122240-646110-00000 001-122240-646110-00000 001-122240-646110-00000 001-122240-646110-00000 001-122240-646110-00000 001-122240-646110-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1 PAGE VCHR NET 137.50 0.00 137.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 137.50 3,657.14 0.00 CHECK NO 593795 VENDOR 900050 - RONALD H STAHNKE 3,578.60 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,657.14 3,578.60 7,235.74 0.00 139.00 0.00 139.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 139.00 0.00 941.25 0.00 941.25 0.00 937.50 0.00 937.50 0.00 934.00 0.00 934.00 0.00 934.00 0.00 934.00 0.00 934.00 0.00 934.00 0.00 640.00 0.00 640.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,380.75 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 430115 DESCRIPTION BOOK REFUND-R STAHNKE R STAHNKE BOOK REFUND COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156110-347110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 430112 593796 VENDOR 900050 - RONALD FLqENER REF 361996 R HAENER R HAENER REF 361996 113-138900-321110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001645 30001645 30001645 30001645 30001407 30001645 30001645 30001645 30001645 593644 VENDOR 325750 - RWA INC. 10028 102659 8/02 9955 102659 8/02 9817 102659 7/02 9822 102659 7/02 0010048 204402 SVS 9/02 9823 102659 7/02 9824 102659 7/02 10027 102659 8/02 10026 102659 8/02 333-163653-631400-60027 0.00 333-163653-631400-60027 0.00 333-163653-631400-60027 0.00 333-163653-631400-60027 0.00 111-138317-634999-00000 0.00 333-163653-631400-60027 0.00 333-163653-631400-60027 0.00 333-163653-631400-60027 0.00 333-163653-631400-60027 0.00 CHECK NO 30001456 593487 VENDOR 199020 - SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IV51034 001-156363-F>46970-00000 311533 PARTS 0.00 AMT NET 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 54,932.89 267.50 3,024.13 27,643.75 2,826.38 48,084.34 267.50 63,929.83 2,684.15 CHECK TOTAL 661.50 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 30.00 30.00 75.00 75.00 54,932.89 267.50 3,024.13 27,643.75 2,826.38 48,084.34 267.50 63,929.83 2,684.15 203,660.47 661.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 661.50 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 30001379 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 593557VENDOR 266010 - SCHWAB READY MIX INC 30098463 111-163645-653150-00000 311055 CONCRETE AMT DISC 161 1 CHECK NO 30001463 593481 VENDOR 193330 - SCOTT PAINT CORP. 090004318 408-210130-652990-00000 310319 PAINT AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 30001614 30001614 30001614 30001614 593601 2000864894 0654748 310275 TOOLS 2000864894 0654747 310275 TOOLS 2000864894 0656404 310275 TOOLS 2000864894 0659538 310275 TOOLS VENDOR 298330 - SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE 408-253212-652910-00000 408-253212-652910-00000 408-253212-652910-00000 408-253212-652910-00000 VCHR NET 0.00 313.75 0.00 313.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 313.75 0.00 611.16 0.00 611.16 CHECK NO 30001479 593500 VENDOR 211140 - SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY 0228960 191-138785-884100-44200 36247920001 OURQUIA 310979 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 611.16 CHECK NO 30001422 593705 VENDOR 356620 - SECURITY DESIGN SERVICES CORP 9978 001-122240-652910-00000 250597 PANASONIC WV-CK2020A 0.00 7.93 0.00 CHECK NO 30001237 593593 VENDOR 288890 - SEVERN TRENT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 10/02 PELICAN BAY 311501 10/02 PELICAN BAY 109-182601-634999-00000 109-182900-634999-00000 778-182700-634999-00000 7.93 0.00 47.00 0.00 47.00 0.00 80.90 0.00 80.90 0.00 201.18 0.00 201.18 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 337.01 1,089.98 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,089.98 1,089.98 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 400.00 1.320.00 1,360.00 1,320.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.000.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO ~JqT DISC CHECK NO 30001421 593384 VENDOR 16910 5024-7 311380 PAINT SUPPLIES SHERWIN WILLIAMS 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001622 593385 VENDOR 17080 SKIP CAMP 10/24-25/02 TRVL S.CAMP 10/24-25/02 TRVL S.C$~MP 001-122240-654370-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001419 593386 VENDOR 17260 302214 311912 USER FEES SOLINET 129-156112-634200-33774 0.00 CHECK NO 30001608 593622 VENDOR 315770 SOUTH FLORIDA INPATIENT MEDICAL 3/4,5,7 4/23.24 M.OLEARY 001-155930-631210-00000 312077 3/4,5,7 4/23,24 M.OLEARY 0.00 CHECK NO 20041992 593324 5837BH AND VENDOR 318510 SOUTH SEAS RESORT R HOVELL 9/25-27 195-110407-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001418 593586 VENDOR 282370 644 311699 REPAIRS SOUTHWEST ELECTRIC, INC. 001-122240-652992-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001609 593561 VENDOR 271040 SPECIALISTS IN UROLOGY 8/17-20/02 H.MANCHA 001-155930-631210-00000 312078 8/17-20/02 H.M~JtCHA 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 13.76 CHECK TOTAL 66.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,622.79 CHECK TOTAL 572.65 CHECK TOTAL 104.00 CHECK TOTAL 3,979.06 CHECK TOTAL 2,096.25 CHECK TOTAL 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 pAGE VCHR NET 4,000.00 13.76 13.76 66.00 66.00 2.622.79 2,622.79 572.65 572.65 104.00 104.00 3,979.06 3,979.06 2,096.25 2,096.25 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK NO 593485 VENDOR 195660 - SPECTRUM PAINTING & RESTORATION 30001792 REF 2002091448 SPECTRUM REF 2002091448 SPECTRUM PAINTING 113-138900-322110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001420 593387 VENDOR 17410 - SPEEDY BLUEPRINTING 10208862 001-122240-647110-00000 251116 BOND COPY 24X36 0.00 CHECK NO 30001735 30001735 593534 VENDOR 250020 - SPRINT 362935190 10/7 362935190 10/7 484799095 10/13 484799095 10/13 109-182601-641400-00000 109-182900-641400-00000 778-182700-641400-00000 001-155410-641900-00000 001-155410-641200-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001744 30001734 30001787 30001734 30001744 30001744 30001738 593542 VENDOR 255040 - SPRINT 262-8526-135 10/13-11/12 262-8526-135 10/13-11/12 643 3266 004 10/16-11/15 643 3266 004 10/16-11/15 774 4010 010 10/19-11/18 774 4010 010 10/19-11/18 092 1460 172 9/16-10/15 092 1460 172 9/16-10/15 261-2382-279 9/25-10/24 261-2382-279 9/25-10/24 455-2612-627 10/10-11/9 455-2612-627 10/10-11/9 657 9795 548 9/28-10/27 657 9795 548 9/28-10/27 312162 001-156110-641900-00000 113-138900-641900-00000 001-100110-641210-00000 495-192370-641900-00000 001-156110-641900-00000 001-156145-641900-00000 495-192330-641900-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,681.00 CHECK TOTAL 12. O0 CHECK TOTAL 16.10 16.10 10.07 24.76 69.27 CHECK TOTAL 94.41 32.30 29.80 190.90 135.80 28.82 56.52 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 1,681.00 1,681. O0 12.00 12.00 42.27 94.03 136.30 94.41 32.30 29.80 190.90 135.80 28.82 56.52 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30001787 092 2087 866 10/16-11/15 092 2087 866 10/15-11/15 30001734 643 6968 299 10/16-11/15 643 6968 299 10/16-11/15 30001734 658 0783 565 10/13-11/12 658 0783 565 10/13-11/12 30001734 101 2152 615 10/1-10/31 101 2152 615 10/1-10/31 30001744 352-7000-700 10/13-11/12 352-7000-700 10/13-11/12 30001744 455-8088-880 10/10-11/9 455-8088-880 10/10-11/9 30001744 262-0132-913 10/13-11/12 262-0132-913 10/13-11/12 30001739 695 2778 742 10/4-11/3 695 2778 742 10/4-11/3 312159 30001744 793-7520-659 10/13-11/12 793-7520-659 10/13-11/12 30001734 643 6870 870 10/16-11/15 643 6870 870 10/16-11/15 30001744 793-0883-151 10/13-11/12 793-0883-151 10/13-11/12 30001744 254-0139-718 10/10-11/9 254-0139-718 10/10-11/9 30001744 793-5655-272 10/13-11/12 793-5655-272 10/13-11/12 30001744 262-4130-621 10/13-11/12 262-4130-621 10/13-11/12 30001744 254-1494-531 10/10-11/9 254-1494-531 10/10-11/9 30001744 455-1441-953 10/10-11/9 455-1441-953 10/10-11/9 30001787 774 5148 147 10/19-11/18 774 5148 147 10/19-11/18 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 441-256110-641100-00000 0.00 113-138900-641900-00000 0.00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 001-155410-641900-00000 0.00 408-253221-641100-00000 0.00 001-156145-641900-00000 0.00 129-156112-634999-33015 0.00 495-192350-641900-00000 0.00 521-122450-641900-00000 0.00 001-155810-641900-00000 0.00 521-122410-641900-00000 0.00 001-156110-641900-00000 0.00 521-122410-641400-00000 0.00 001-156110-641900-00000 0.00 129-156112-634999-33015 0.00 001-156140-641900-00000 0.00 001-156180-641210-00000 0.00 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC 171.05 0.00 VCHR NET 171.05 215.00 0.00 215.00 624.78 0.00 624.78 214.57 0.00 214.57 76.46 0.00 76.46 330.06 0.00 330.06 47.25 0.00 47.25 32.47 0.00 32.47 26.95 0.00 26.95 100.89 0.00 100.89 200.61 0.00 200.61 371.42 0.00 371.42 36.15 0.00 36.15 167.81 0.00 167.81 90.13 0.00 90.13 42.89 0.00 42.89 PAGE 101 37.39 0.00 37.39 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001738 30001744 30001734 30001734 30001734 DESCRIPTION 657 9003 434 9/28-10/27 657 9003 434 9/28-11/27 312162 793-2234-808 10/13-11/12 793-2234-808 10/13-11/12 643 6870 870 9/16-10/15 643 6870 870 9/16-10/15 774 5653 109 9/19-10/18 774 5653 109 9/19-10/18 597 1737 063 10/7-11/6 597 1737 063 10/7-11/6 30001734 417 0417 719 9/28-10/27 417 0417 719 9/28-10/27 30001734 304 0513 853 10/10-11/9 304 0513 853 10/10-11/9 30001734 352 8323 718 10/13-11/12 352 8323 718 10/13-11/12 30001734 591 4986 618 10/19-11/18 591 4986 618 10/19-11/18 30001745 092 4316 305 10/16-11/15 092 4316 305 10/16-11/15 30001734 092 4237 364 9/16-10/15 092 4237 364 9/16-10/15 30001734 793 3795 299 10/13-11/12 793 3795 299 10/13-11/12 30001744 643-1883-119 10/16-11/15 643-1883-119 10/16-11/15 30001734 643 3099 953 10/16-11/15 643 3099 953 10/16-11/15 30001733 092 4262 715 10/16-11/15 092 4262 715 10/16-11/15 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 495-192330-641900-00000 0.00 198-157410-641900-00000 0.00 001-155810-641900-00000 0.00 001-155810-641900-00000 0.00 109-182601-641400-00000 0.00 109-182900-641400-00000 0.00 778-182700-641400-00000 0.00 101-163620-641900-00000 0.00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 001-156363-641900-00000 0.00 408-253212-641100-00000 0.00 408-233352-641100-00000 0.00 408-253211-641100-00000 0.00 408-253221-641100-00000 0.00 408-233312-641100-00000 0.00 495-192370-641900-00000 0.00 001-122240-641210-00000 0.00 101-163610-641900-00000 0.00 470-173441-641900-00000 O.O0 001-156110-641900-00000 0.00 161 1' AMT NET VCHR DISC 212.75 0.00 PAGE 102 VCHR NET 212.75 99.01 0.00 99.01 32.59 0.00 32.59 34.32 0.00 34.32 46.10 46.10 28.80 0.00 121.00 2.06 0.00 2.06 31.65 0.00 31.65 70.48 0.00 70.48 178.93 0.00 178.93 184.10 184.10 368.45 368.45 409.55 0.00 1,514.65 215.00 0.00 215.00 43.82 0.00 43.82 29.01 0.00 29.01 87.85 0.00 87.85 3,058.00 0.00 3.058.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001787 30001734 DESCRIPTION 774 4702 219 10/19-11/18 774 4702 219 10/19-11/18 591 1611 301 10/19-11/18 591 1611 301 10/19-11/18 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AM1- DISC 129-156112-634999-33015 0.00 408-233351-641100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001737 30001736 593688 VENDOR 349940 - SPRINT 597 1737 078 10/7-11/6 597 1737 078 10/7-11/6 455 7891 010 10/10-11/9 455 7891 010 10/10-11/9 311303 111-156380-641900-00000 0.00 111-156390-641900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001416 30001415 593729 41195 311030 EQUIPMENT 41191 311029 EQUIPMENT VENDOR 364180 - SPY TOWN SURVEILLANCE 301-120435-762200-52001 0.00 301-120435-762200-52001 0.00 CHECK NO 30001793 593416 VENDOR 120640 - ST. FRANCIS II ANIMAL CLINIC 02-10689 M.ALLIGOOD 610-155413-631970-00000 311690 02-10689 M.ALLIGOOD 0.00 CHECK NO 430138 593768 VENDOR 900030 - STEVE MESSNER 10/6-8/02 P/D S.MESSNER 10/6-8/02 P/D S.MESSNER 408-253221-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001450 593477 VENDOR 188390 - STEVEN R. POLIAKOFF,MD. PA. 8/23 G.DESIR 001-155930-631210-00000 251261 8/23 G.DESIR 0.00 CHECK NO 593388 VENDOR 17800 - SUMMIT HOME RESP. SVC, INC AMT NET 36.57 775.29 CHECK TOTAL 109.00 109.00 CHECK TOTAL 4,795.00 4,795.00 CHECK TOTAL 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 42.00 CHECK TOTAL 243.75 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 103 VCHR NET 36.57 775.29 9,897.41 109.00 109.00 218.00 4,795. O0 4,795.00 9,590. O0 75.00 75.00 42.00 42.00 243.75 243.75 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001610 30001610 30001610 30001610 DESCRIPTION E.SOTO 10/7/02 11/6/02 312079 E.SOTO 10/7/02 11/6/02 G.KOGER 10/4/02 11/3/02 312079 G.KOGER 10/4/02 11/3/02 G,KOGER 10/4/02 11/03/02 312079 G.KOGER 10/4/02 11/3/02 E.SOTO 10/7/02 11/6/02 312079 E.SOTO 10/7/02 11/6/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-652810-00000 0.00 001-155930-652810-00000 0.00 001-155930-652810-00000 0.00 001-155930-652810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001840 593323 VENDOR 262150 SUN LIFE OF CANADA 10/2002 ADVICE PLUS SVS 517-121640-645170-00000 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 30001721 593444 VENDOR 156260 206979 TO 9/25/02 SURETY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 301-120435-762200-52001 0.00 CHECK NO 30001460 593389 VENDOR 18040 TAYLOR RENTAL 1-228028-04 251103 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 001-122240-644600-00000 CHECK NO 30001451 593574 VENDOR 278210 TECHNICAL TREATMENT SERVICES INC 1531 408-253221-634999-00000 250304 EQUIPMENT /LABOR AMT NET VCHR DISC 80.03 0,00 CHECK NO 593525 VENDOR 240470 30001478 022040 250296 PARTS THE AVANTI COMPANY 408-253212-655100-00000 PAGE 104 CHECK NO 593404 VENDOR 109480 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS VCHR NET 80.03 55,00 0,00 55.00 213.75 0.00 213.75 213.75 0.00 213.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 562,53 4,191.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75,633.28 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,191.00 4.191.00 75,633,28 75,633.28 0.00 212.84 0.00 212.84 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 212.84 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 343.88 0.00 343.88 0.00 343.88 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001509 DESCRIPTION SUBS 10/1-10/1/03 311857 SUBS 10/1-10/1/03 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-454010-654110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001213 593602 VENDOR 298860 - THE EQUIPMENT BOOKIE 13218 322-183825-644600-51125 109-182901-652990-00000 250014 RENT SUPPL. 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001447 593718 VENDOR 360240 - THE GAIL EASLEY COMPANY 02-157 113-138312-634999-00000 206366 SUPPLIES 0.00 CHECK NO 30001257 30001257 30001257 '30001246 30001246 30001289 30001247 30001289 30001394 30001247 593380 VENDOR 14880 - THE PHOTO LAB 82957 PUBLIC INFO 250933 PROCESSING 83048 PUBLIC INFO 250933 PROCESSING 83060 PUBLIC INFO 250933 PROCESSING 83149 ANIMAL CONTROL 251164 PROCESSING 83210 ANIMAL CONTROL 251164 PROCESSING 82942 WASTEWATER 310557 PROCESSING 83222 ANIMAL CONTROL 251167 PROCESSING 83039 WASTEWATER 310557 PROCESSING 83271 PUBLIC INFO 251386 PROCESSING 111-100130-647210-00000 111-100130-647210-00000 111-100130-647210-00000 001-155410-647210-00000 001-155410-647210-00000 408-233351-647210-00000 001-155410~647210-00000 408-233351-647210-00000 111-100130-647210-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 977.00 CHECK TOTAL 850.00 5.98 CHECK TOTAL 4,524.50 CHECK TOTAL 50.30 5.30 42.00 6.40 5.20 10.60 6.40 16.10 82.20 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 1 PAGE 105 VCHR NET 977.00 977.00 855.98 855.98 4,524.50 4,524.50 50.30 5.30 42.00 6.40 5.20 10.60 6.40 16.10 82.20 83130 ANIMAL CONTROL 001-155410-647210-00000 0.00 5.80 0.00 5.80 251167 PROCESSING OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001257 30001257 30001245 30001245 30001394 DESCRIPTION 83110 PUBLIC INFO 250933 PROCESSING 82938 PUBIC INFO 250933 PROCESSING 83008 ANIMAL CONTROL 251168 PROCESSING 83079 251168 PROCESSING 83230 PUBLIC INFO 251386 PROCESSING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-100130-647210-00000 0.00 111-100130-647210-00000 0.00 001-155410-647210-00000 0.00 001-155410-647210-00000 0.00 111-100130-647210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001618 593708 VENDOR 358240 - THOMAS HENNING 10/17/02 TRVL T.HENNING 001-100010-640200-00000 10/17/02 TRVL T.HENNING 161 CHECK NO 30001452 593412 VENDOR 118280 - THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP ACT#1245418 FEINt52127351 001-122240-654110-00000 251104 RENEWAL FOR SKIP CAMP AMT NET VCHR DISC 34.85 0.00 CHECK NO 30000860 593600 VENDOR 298190 - TOLL BROTHERS. INC. REF 365078 TOLL BROS. 113-000000-115420-00000 REF 365078 TOLL BROS. PAGE 106 CHECK NO 30001461 30001461 30001461 30001461 593685 7/18-30 S.SHEPARD 251263 7/18-30/02 S.SHEPARD 8/1,6,8 S.SHEPARD 251263 8/1,6.8 S.SHEPARD 8/27,29 9/6 S.SHEPARD 251263 8/27,29 9/6 S.SHEPARD 8/13.15,20 S.SHEPARD 251263 8/13,15,20 S.SHEPARD VENDOR 348580 - TONI SANTOS, INC. 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 VCHR NET 34.85 181.35 0.00 181.35 6.40 0.00 6.40 10.00 0.00 10.00 7.75 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 7.75 470.65 0.00 179.40 0.00 179.40 0.00 179.40 0.00 179.40 0.00 179.40 0.00 179.40 0.00 179.40 0.00 179.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 249.00 0.00 249.00 0.00 249.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16.24 0.00 16.24 0.00 16.24 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001611 30001611 30001611 593548 8/29/02 S.POWELL 312083 8/29/02 S. POWELL 9/5,12/02 C.NEWCOMB 312083 9/5,12/02 C.NEWCOMB 9/4/02 S.BECKER 312083 9/4/02 S.BECKER VENDOR 259320 - TOTAL SURGERY CENTER 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001454 593390 VENDOR 18490 - TRI-COUNTY BLUEPRINT & SUPPLY 6 020632 126-138332-652990-35000 251278 XEROX BOND CHECK NO 430139 593797 VENDOR 900050 - TRIMAR CONSTRUCTION INC. REF 366135 TRIMAR CONSTRU 113-000000-115420-00000 REF 366135 TRIMAR CONSTRUCTION AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001462 30001462 30001462 30001462 30001462 30001462 30001462 593472 14235275 311370 PARTS 14252365 311370 PARTS 14235277 311370 PARTS 14252366 311370 PARTS 14252364 311370 PARTS 14252367 311370 PARTS 14235276 311370 PARTS VENDOR 182050 - TROPIC SUPPLY INC. 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 1,537.25 O. O0 1,358.50 0.00 2,288.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 107 VCHR NET 717.60 1,537.25 1,358.50 2,288.00 5,183.75 0.00 17.50 0.00 17.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17.50 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 250.00 0.00 241.91 0.00 241.91 0.00 129.95 0.00 129.95 0.00 9.50 0.00 9.50 0.00 61.20 0.00 61.20 0.00 98.74 0.00 98.74 0.00 54.86 0.00 54.86 0.00 100.48 0.00 100.48 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001462 30001462 30001462 30001462 14252363 311370 PARTS 14235274 311370 PARTS 1423573 311370 PARTS 14252362 311370 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652998-00000 0.00 AMT NET 25.92 3.36 111.16 15.01 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 108 VCHR NET 25.92 3.36 111.16 15.01 CHECK NO 30001455 CHECK NO 30001853 593681 VENDOR 345310 - TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1852408069 001-156363-634999-00000 250980 OCT LANDSCAPE MAINT FOR SUGDE 593506 VENDOR 221770 - TY STULLER 11/2-8/02 P/D T. STULLER 11/2-8/02 P/D T.STULLER 412-273512-640300-70124 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 832.84 CHECK TOTAL 126.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 852.09 832.84 832.84 126.00 CHECK NO 30001459 593687 VENDOR 349930 - U S FILTER/R J ENVIRONMENTAL RJE-2909 408-253221-634999-00000 311615 MAINT 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 842.50 0.00 0.00 126.00 842.50 CHECK NO 30001607 593433 VENDOR 137390 - U.S. POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE 2 ROLLS 001-421040-641950-00000 251153 POSTAGE 2 ROLLS 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 97.00 0.00 0.00 842.50 97.00 CHECK NO 30001619 CHECK NO 593726 VENDOR 362230 - UF/IFAS OFFICE OF CONFERENCES & REGIS 10/27-30 E.MIAVITZ 001-157110-654360-00000 251270 REGIS 10/27-30 E.MIAVITZ 593585 VENDOR 282270 - UNITED RENTAL 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 130.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 97,00 130.00 130.00 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001458 DESCRIPTION 28284426-001 251199 RENTAL-FRONT END LOADER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 495-192370-644600-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001417 30001417 30001613 30001613 30001417 30001417 30001417 593632 VENDOR 318860 - US BIOSYSTEMS, INC. 98173 310392 LAB ANALYSIS 114-178975-634999-00000 99172 310392 LAB ANALYSIS 114-178975-634999-00000 99717 311870 SERVICES 408-253250-634999-00000 99669 311870 SERVICES 408-253250-634999-00000 98976 310392 LAB ANALYSIS 114-178975-634999-00000 98189 310392 LAB ANALYSIS 114-178975-634999-00000 100168 310392 LAB ANALYSIS 114-178975-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 196.60 CHECK TOTAL 30.00 387.00 292.00 66.00 459.00 225.00 255.00 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 109 VCHR NET 196.60 196.60 30.00 387.00 292.00 66.00 459.00 225.00 255.00 CHECK NO 30001453 593599 VENDOR 297530 - US FILTER CORP 8778011 408-233312-652910-00000 250222 REPAIR PARTS FOR MAIN LIFT ST CHECK NO 30001688 A2118449CJ 10/1-10/31/02 A2118449CJ 10/1-10/31/02 311990 593618 VENDOR 314680 - VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES 001-178985-641150-00000 30001678 A2102038CJ 10/1-10/31/02 A2102038CJ 10/1-10/31/02 311865 30001669 A2003669CJ 10/1-10/31/02 001-454010-641150-00000 408-233351-641150-00000 408-210130-641150-00000 408-233312-641150.00000 408-233352-641150-00000 408-233313-641150-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 270.00 CHECK TOTAL 19.87 5.95 109.00 38.35 8.50 8.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.714.00 270.00 270.00 19.87 5.95 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 30001679 A2003669CJ 10/1-10/31/02 310592 A2013336CJ 10/1-10/30/02 A2013336CJ 10/1-10/31/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233350-641150-00000 0.00 408-210120-641150-00000 0.00 114-178970-641150-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001612 593757 VENDOR 366280 - VOICE & SPEECH, INC. 5003 116-121830-654110-34200 251472 PRESENTATION SKILLS MATERIAL 161 CHECK NO 30001841 20045746 30001841 30001841 30001841 30001841 30001841 30001841 30001841 30001843 30001841 593474 VENDOR 185990 - VWR SCIENTIFIC 12477980 310394 LAB SUPPLIES 114-178975-652910-00000 12198971 9/9 206068 DUP PYMT 408-253211-652310-00000 12564188 310394 LAB SUPPLIES 114-178975-652910-00000 12493858 CM 310394 LAB SUPPLIES 114-178975-652910-00000 12448669 CH 310394 LAB SUPPLIES 114-178975-652910-00000 12395686 310394 LAB SUPPLIES 114-178975-652910-00000 12210031 310394 LAB SUPPLIES 114-178975-652910-00000 12444278 310394 LAB SUPPLIES 114-178975-652910-00000 12354573 310394 LAB SUPPLIES 114-178975-652910-00000 12629936 310588 SUPPLIES 408-233312-652990-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 0.00 8.50 0.00 PAGE 110 VCHR NET 173.20 14.87 0.00 14.87 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 213.89 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.00 0.00 328.40 0.00 328.40 0.00 127.90- 0.00 127.90- 0.00 216.30 0.00 216.30 406.08- 0.00 0.00 0.00 117.36- 0.00 406.08- 117.36- 0.00 80.15 0.00 80.15 0.00 382.20 0.00 382.20 0.00 84.51 0.00 84.51 0.00 289.05 0.00 289.05 0.00 40.31 0.00 40.31 12339160 114-178975-652910-00000 0.00 140.85 0.00 140.85 310394 LAB SUPPLIES OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AM1- DISC CHECK NO 30001716 593665 VENDOR 335990 - WALGREEN COMPANY 227549 001-155930-652710-00000 251265 9/15-9/30 PRESC DRUGS 0.00 CHECK NO 30001729 30000955 30000955 30000955 30000955 30000171 30000955 30000955 30000171 30000171 30000171 30000955 30000955 593392 VENDOR 19370 - WALLACE INTERNATIONAL FC83301 251230 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 FC85586 311152 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 FC85577 311152 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 FC85330 311152 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 FC85421 311152 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 FC86169 311152 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 FC84000 311152 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 FC83591 311152 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 FC85711 311152 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 FC85680 311152 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 FC86137 311152 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 FC85189 311152 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 237.10 CHECK TOTAL 2.58 9.89 84.15- 87.05 21.99 24.72- 249.94 18.36 17.68 4O.38 83.40 291.26 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 910.43 237.10 237.10 2.58 9.89 84.15- 87,05 21.99 24.72- 249.94 18.36 17.68 40.38 83.40 291.26 FC84938 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 84.15 0.00 84.15 311152 SUPPLIES OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 30001729 30001729 30000955 30000955 30001729 30001729 30000171 30000171 30000955 DESCRIPTION FC83938 251230 SUPPLIES FC84096 251230 SUPPLIES FC85025 311152 SUPPLIES FC84607 311152 SUPPLIES FC83927 251230 SUPPLIES FC83277 251230 SUPPLIES FC85979 311152 SUPPLIES FC85320 311152 SUPPLIES FC85089 311152 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 30001802 30001802 593415 VENDOR 119030 - WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. 10/02 FRANCHISE FEE 311543 10/02 FRANCHISE FEE 473-173411-313710-00000 10/02 COLLECTIONS 311543 10/02 COLLECTIONS 473-173411-634800-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 30001728 593727 VENDOR 362610 - WATER WORKS AQUATIC PT, INC. G. COOPERSMITH 8/6.8/8-8/ 001-155930-631990-00000 G. COOPERSMITH 8/6.8/8-8/15 161 CHECK NO 30001713 593573 VENDOR 276690 - WEATHER SERVICES INTERNATIONAL 18881 001-144510-644620-00000 311910 WEATHER SVS EQUIPTMENT AMT NET VCHR DISC 440.16 0.00 1 PAGE 112 VCHR NET 440.16 307.68 0.00 307.68 64.39 0.00 64.39 268.30- 0.00 268.30- 19.25 0.00 19.25 213.96 0.00 213.96 363.09 0.00 363.09 24.72 0.00 24.72 16.68 0.00 16.68 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16,053.89- 0.00 496,048.84 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,979.44 16.053.89- 496.048.84 479.994.95 0.00 147.00 0.00 147.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 273.00 0.00 273.00 0.00 273.00 OCTOBER 30. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001830 593553 VENDOR 264010 - WEISS RATINGS INC 445483 307-156111-766100-54001 311394 RENEWELS FOR YEAR 03-04 0.00 CHECK NO 30001715 30001732 30001715 30001732 593426 VENDOR 129350 - WELLESLEY INN L00168 8/23-8/23 250965 RESERVATION FOR INTERVIEWED L00168 9/16 251423 L00168 9/16 L00168 8/24-8/24 250965 RESERVATION FOR INTERVIEWED P50993-01 9/4-9/5 251423 P50993-01 9/4-9/5 113-138312-640310-00000 101-163612-640300-00000 113-138312-640310-00000 101-163612-640300-00000 161 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,929.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 30001714 593545 VENDOR 256920 - WEST GROUP 802891784 251448 FLA PRACTIVE HANDBOOK 001-421030-654110-00000 1 CHECK NO 430135 593798 VENDOR 900050 - WHITEHALL QUALITY HOMES, INC WHITEHALL QUALITY 365878 113-000000-115420-00000 WHITEHALL QUALITY HALL 365878 PAGE CHECK NO 30001718 593560 VENDOR 267390 - WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN INC 27048514 001-122240-634999-00000 251105 RENT MULTI SECTIONAL 9/22-30 VCHR NET 147.00 CHECK NO 30001636 593724 VENDOR 361660 - WYNDHAM RIVERFRONT HOTEL CONF#220874 D.BARTHEL 001-121148-640300-00000 251320 CON# 220874 11/11-14 D.BARTHE 3,929.50 3,929.50 0.00 114.00 0.00 114.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 114.00 0.00 114.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 393.00 0.00 91.50 0.00 91.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 91.50 0.00 796.00 0.00 796.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 332.10 0.00 332.10 0.00 332.10 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.20 0.00 21.20 0.00 21.20 OCTOBER 30, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 30001730 30001730 30001717 593508 VENDOR 223690 - XEROX CORPORATION 181675921 250490 COPIES 111-138313-651110-00000 181693046 250490 COPIES 111-138313-651110-00000 181583867 250483 YAN TONER CARTIDGE 111-138313-651110-00000 0.00 0.00 0,00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 215,98 387.98 193.99 161 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 796.00 215.98 387.98 193.99 CHECK NO 30001719 593533 VENDOR 249650 . XEROX CORPORATION 091290221 111-138317-644620-00000 250762 X-12 FIERY SER. 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 128.96 0.00 0.00 797.95 128.96 463 CHECKS WRITTEN CHECK TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 0.00 0.00 128.96 2,756,554.17 161 1 Misc. Correspondence Agenda Date Agenda Item # TO: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners FROM: Derek Johnssen, General Accounting Manager Clerk of the Circuit Court/Finance Department DATE: RE: October 23, 2002 Miscellaneous Correspondence - BCC Agenda Please place the following items on the next available BCC agenda and call me at extension 8350 with the date and Miscellaneous Correspondence agenda item number. MI=DITI:::RRA ~OHTH COMMUNITY DI=VF:LOPMF:NT DISTRICT Pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapters 189 and 190, Mediterra District, has submitted the following: (a) (b) (c) Minutes of the July 24, 2002 Meeting Adopted Budget FY2003 Unaudited Financial Statements dated 06/30/02 South Community Development Thank you :\special\special Mediterra South Community Development District 10300 NW 11th Manor · Coral Springs, Florida 33071 · Telephone: (954) 796-6631 · Fax: (954) 796-0623 DATE: October 14, 2002 Cheryl Deering, Sales Manager MEDITERRA ~TY 15836 Savona Way Naples, Florida 34110 GRAU & COMPANY, P.A. 2700 N. Military Trail, #350 Boca Raton, FL 33431 Mr. James L. Mitchell CI,ERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT Finance Department 2671 Airport Road, Court Plaza III P.O. Box 413016 Naples, Florida 34112-3016 Mr. Jim Mudd COLLIER COUNTY MANAGER Governmental Center 3301 East Tamiami Trail Administrative Bldg Naples, Florida 34112 Dennis H. Derby, Jr. Municipal Credit Analyst FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK 255 South County Road, 2nd Floor Palm Beach, Florida 33480-6300 FROM: RE: James P. Ward, District Manager July 24, 2002 Meetin~ Enclosed for your records is a copy of the above referenced meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Mediterra South Community Development District, which are to be kept on file for public access. JPW/tj Enel: MINUTES OF MEETING MED1TERRA SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The regular meeting of the Mediterra South Community Development District was held Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 12:20 p.m. at the Club at Mediterra, 15755 Corso Mediterra Circle, Naples, Florida. Present and constituting a quorum were: Margaret Emblidge Grady Miars Jim Carroll Lowell Ferguson Katherine Green Chairman Vice Chairman Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary ~Assistant Secretary Also present were: James P. Ward C. Sam Kissinger Brian Lamb Dan Cox District Manager District Staff District Staff District Attorney FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS Roll Call Mr. Kissinger called the meeting to order and called the roll. TI-IIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS Approval of the Minutes of the June 26, 2002 Meetings Mr. Kissinger stated that each Board member received a copy of the minutes of the June 26, 2002 meeting and requested any additions, corrections or deletions. There not being any, [On MOTION by Mr. Miars seconded by Mr. Ferguson [with all in favor the minutes of the June 26, 2002 I meeting were approved. FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Public Hearing to Consider the Adoption of the Budget for Fiscal Year 2003 and Levy of Non Ad Valorem Assessments On MOTION by Ms. Green seconded by Mr. Carroll with all in favor the public hearing was opened. July 24, 2002 Mediterra South CDD There being no comments or questions from the public, I,On MOTION by Mr. Carroll seconded by Mr. Ferguson,I I with all in favor the public hearing was closed. FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Staff Reports A. Attorney There not being any, the next item followed. 161 There not being any, the next item followed. C. Manager - Financial Statements There not being any the next item followed. SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS Oath of Office for Supervisor Katherine Green Mr. Ward stated after checking our records we found Ms. Green had not been sworn into office, which I will do today. At the next meeting I will prepare a resolution to codify any actions that were taken from November 2001 election through the swearing in today. Mr. Ward, being a Notary Public of the State of Florida, administered the The signed oath is attached hereto and made a Oath of Office to Katherine Green. part of the public record. FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Public Hearing to Consider the Adoption of the Budget for Fiscal Year 2003 and Levy of Non Ad Valorem Assessments (continued) [On MOTION by Mr. Ferguson seconded by Mr. Carroll [with all in favor Resolution 2002-5 Adopting the Final [Budget for Fiscal Year 2003 was adopted. liOn MOTION by Ms. Green seconded by Mr. Carroll with[[ [all in favor Resolution 2002-6 Levying a Debt Service and[[ [Maintenance Assessment for Fiscal Year 2003 was[[ [adopted. SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Supervisor's Requests and Audience Comments There not being any, the next item followed. 1 2 July 24, 2002 Mediterra South CDD SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment 161 IlOn MOTION by Mr. Ferguson seconded by Mr. Carroll Iwith all in favor the meeting was adjourned at 12:28 Jim~/~r~oll, Assistan~t Secretary lidge, Chairman Wednesday July 24, 2002 12:00 p.m. 1. 2. 3. 4. AGENDA MEDITERRA SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Club at Mediterra 15755 Corso Mediterra Circle Naples, Florida Public Hearing to Consider the Adoption of the Budget for Fiscal Year 2003 and Levy of Non Ad Valorem Assessments 5. Staff Reports A. Attorney B. Engineer C. Manager - Financial Statements 6. Supervisor's Requests and Audience Comments 7. Adjournment NOTE TO ALI. MEETING ATTENDEES: Please identify yourself each time you speak to facilitate transcription of meeting minutes. Tbnnk you for your assistance. Roll Call Oath of Office for Katherine C. Green Approval of the Minutes of the June 26, 2002 meeting NapLes DaiLy News NapLes, FL 34102 HEDITERRA SOUTH COHflUNITY DEVELOPHENT DISTRICT 210 N UNIVERSITY DR #301 CORAL SPRINGS FL 33071 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily Neus REFERENCE: 056~ 58~86589 Notice of Public Mee State of FLorida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared AngeLa Bryant, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Secretary of the Naples Daily Heus, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said news~per on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a news~per published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said ColL~*~ County, FLorida, each day and ~s been entered as sec~d class matter at the I~)st office in HapLes, ~n said Collier County, Florida, for a perJ~ of 1 year next prec~ing the f~rst publication of the atta;h~ oopy of advertisem~t; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor pr~Js~ any person, f~rm or cor~ration any discount, rehte, commission or refund for the pur~se of securing th~s advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLZSHED ON: 07/04 07/~1 AD SPACE: I00.000 INCH FILED ON: 07/11/02 , ................ Signature of Affiant ~y~- -'-T.._~'~ . Y. ~ ~ y Commission DD05~336 ~ '*~ Exp,re~ September ~ 2005 Oath of Office 161 ! I, Katherine C. Green, a resident of the State of Florida and citizen of the United States of America, and being a Supervisor of the Mediterra South Community Development District and a recipient of public funds on behalf of the District, do hereby solemnly swear or affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States and of the State of Florida, and will faithfully, honestly and impartially discharge the duties devolving upon me in the office of Supervisor of the Mediterra South Community Development District, Naples, Florida. Katherine C. Green Date 7/~ c~/~)~ Sworn to (or affirmed) before me this 24th day of July, 2002 by Katherine C. Green whose signature appears herein above. .--~ ,~ James P. Ward _--"*.-'~?~..'.,~ MY COMMISSION # CC864934 EXPIRES '; '"'~'~ December 19, 2005 BONOED 'rHRU T~OY FAIN INSURANCE, INC Nota~ Public State 5-f Florida Print Name My Commission expires Personally known I/~ or produced identification Type of identification RESOLUTION 2002-5 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL BUDGET OF THE MEDITERRA SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 Whereas, the District Manager has heretofore prepared and submitted to the Board, for approval, the District's proposed General Fund Budget for the ensuing fiscal year; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held on this 24th day of July, 2002, at which members of the general public were accorded the opportunity to speak prior to the adoption of the final budget; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE MEDITERRA SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; 1. The General Fund Budget heretofore submitted to and approved by the Board is hereby adopted as the final General Fund Budget of the District for Fiscal Year 2003. 2. A verified copy of said final General Fund Budget shall be attached as an exhibit to this Resolution in the District's "Official Record of Proceedings". Adopted this 24th day of July, 2002. Chairperson Ja~aes P. Ward Secretary Mediterra North & South Community Development Districts Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Proposed ~)uly 2002 ADOPTED WITH NO CHANGES JULY 24, 2OO2 Mediterra North & South Community Development Districts Operating Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Table of Contents Appropriation Comparison of General Fund Projections General Funds - Operating Budget Debt Service Fund 201 - Hediterra North Series 2001 Debt Service Fund 201 - f4editerra South Series 1999 Debt Service Fund 202 - Hediterra South Series 2001 Exhibit "A" - IVlediterra North Assessment Summary ExhiDit "B" - Hediterra South Assessment Summary Page 1-2 3-8 10- 14 15-19 20- 24 Community Development District General Fund 001 Appropriation Comparison / Detail Analysis Item Administrative Supervisor's Fees Engineering Legal Audit Management Accounting Services Assessment Roll Preparation Travel & Per Diem Telephone Postage & Reproduction Pdnting & Binding Legal Advertising Office Supplies Subscriptions & Memberships Tnsurance Contingencies Department Totals: Total Costs Fiscal Year Percentage 2002 2003 Chan~le $o $o o% $15,000 $7,977 .47% $t5,000 $7,977 .47% $5,500 $2,925 .47% $36,500 $19,935 .45% $8,500 $4,643 0% $0 $798 n/a $300 $160 .47% $350 $186 .47% $1,500 $798 .47% $750 $399 .47% $7,500 $3,324 -56% $275 $146 -47% $175 $93 -47% $3,000 $3,457 15% $500 $266 .47% $94,850 $53,082 -44°/o Field Management Services Other Contractual Services Telephone Office Supplies Subscriptions and Memberships Travel Operating Supplies Department Totals: $10,487 $5,727 .45% $1,000 $532 .47% $750 $399 .47% $50 $27 .47% $100 $53 -47% $1,600 $851 .47% $13,987 $7,589 -460/o Water Management Services Other Contractual Services Aquascaping Miscellaneous Department Totals: $151,000 $53,977 -64% $0 $13,295 n/a $5~000 $2,659 '470/0 $156,000 $70,595 -55°/o Other Fees and Charges Developer Collection Fee Tax Collector Property Appraiser Revenue Reserve Department Totals: $2,675 $1,321 -51% $0 $10 n/a $0 $5 n/a $0 $20 n/a $2,675 $1,357 -49% $267,512 $132,623 -50% Total Appropriations: 1 Mediterra South Community Development District General Fund 001 Appropriation Comparison / Detail Analysis Total Costs Fiscal Year Ztem 2002 2003 Percentage Change Administrative Supervisors Fees Engineering Legal Audit Management Accounting Services Assessment Roll Preparation Travel & Per Diem Telephone Postage & Reproduction Printing & Binding Legal Advertising Office Supplies Subscriptions & Memberships Insurance Contingencies Department Totals: $o $o o% $15,000 $22,023 47% $15,000 $22,023 47% $5,500 $8,075 47% $36,500 $55,037 51% $8,500 $12,817 0% $1,500 $2,202 47% $300 $440 47% $350 $514 47% $1,500 $2,202 47% $750 $1,101 47% $5,000 $9,176 84% $275 $404 47% $175 $257 47% $3,000 $9,543 218% $500 $734 470/0 $93,850 $146,550 56% Field Management Services O~her Contractual Services $10,~87 $15,813 51% Telephone $1,000 $1,468 47% Office Supplies $750 $1,101 47% Subscriptions and Memberships $50 $73 47% Travel $100 $147 47% Operating Supplies $1,600 $2~349 47% Department Totals: $13,987 $20,951 50% Water Management Services Other Contractual Services Aquascaping Miscellaneous Department Totals: Other Fees and Charges Developer Collection Fee Tax Collector Property Appraiser Revenue Reserve Department Totals: Total Appropriations: $70,631 $149,019 111% $0 $36,705 n/a $5,000 $7~341 47% $75,631 $194,901 158% $1,271 $2,197 73% $1,152 $3,115 170% $576 $1,558 170% $2,305 $6,231 170% $5,304 $13,101 147% $188,772 $375,503 99% 161 1 Revenues: Assessment Levy Developer Assessment Expenditures: Administration Services: Supervisor's Fees Engineering Legal Audit Management Accounting Services Assessment Roll Preparation Travel & Per Diem Telephone Postage & Reproduction Printing & Binding Legal Advertising Office Supplies Subscriptions & Memberships Insurance Contingencies Mediterra North & South Community Development Districts Budget Fiscal Year 2003 General Funds Total Revenue: 1 MNCDD MSCDD Total $506 $155,764 $156,270 SL32t117 $219f738 $351~855 ~:1.32~623 ~375;503 $508r125 Total Administrative Services $o $o $o $7,977 $22,023 $30,000 $7,977 $22,023 $30,000 $2,925 $8,075 $11,000 $19,935 $55,037 $74,972 $4,643 $12,817 $17,460 $798 $2,202 $3,000 $160 $,~t0 $600 $186 $514 $700 $798 $2,202 $3,000 $399 $1,101 $1,500 $3,324 $9,176 $12,500 $146 $404 $550 $93 $257 $350 $3,457 $9,543 $13,000 $266 $734 $1,000 $53;082 $146,550 $199,632 Field Management Services Other Contractual Services Telephone Office Supplies Subscriptions and Memberships Travel Operating Supplies Water Management Services Other Contractual Services Aquascaping Aeration - Capital Aeration - Operating Supplies Miscellaneous Total Field Management Services Total Aquatic Services Total Field Services $5,727 $15,813 $21,540 $532 $1,468 $2,000 $399 $1,101 $1,500 $27 $73 $100 $53 $147 $200 $851 $2,349 $3,200 $7,589 $20,951 $28,540 $53,977 $149,019 $13,295 $36,705 $o $o $665 $1,835 $2f659 $7,341 $202,996 $50,000 $0 $2,500 $10,000 $70,595 $194,901 $265,496 $78~184 $215~852 $294,036 Expenditures (conUnued): Other Fees & Charges: Developer Collection Fee Tax Collector Property Appraiser Revenue Reserve Mediterra North & South Community Development Districts 161 Budget Fiscal Year 2003 General Funds MNCDD MSCDD Total 1 Total Other Fees & Charges Total Appropriations $1,321 $2,197 $3,519 $10 $3,115 $3,125 $5 $1,558 $1,563 $20 $6,231 $6,251 $1~357 $13~101 $14r457 $132~623 $375r503 $508r125 Meditarra North Resident Developer Number Charge per ERU of ERUs FY 2002 FY 2003 Revenue i $186.98 278 $175.65 $505.90 J $506 $475.24 $132,117 279 $132,623 Med~erraSouth Number Charge per ERU of ERUs FY2002 FY2003 Revenue Resident Developer 308 $254.77 I $505.73 $155,764 462.53 $347.13 I $475.08 $219,738 770.53 $375,503 4 Mediterra North & South Community Development Districts 161 Budget Fiscal Year 2003 General Funds All Appropriations within the General Fund are shared between Mediterra North and South CDDs based upon the total projected number of ERU$ for each District. The only exception to this cost sharing are the "Other Fees and Charges", which deal with the collection of the assessments through the County Property Tax billing process. MNCDD MSCDD Total Total Projected ERUs: 279 770.53 Cost Allocation: 26,59% 73.41% 1049.53 Administration Services: Supervisor's Fees The amount paid to each Supervisor for the time devoted to the Districts' business and monthly meetings. The amount permitted is $200.00 per meeting for each member of the Board. Since there are five (5) members of each Board and the Boards meets on a monthly basis. Total: $0 Engineering Consists of attendance at scheduled meetings of the Board of Supervisor's, offering advice and consultation on all matters related to the works of the Districts, such as bids for yearly contracts, operating policy, compliance with regulatory permits, etc. Total: $ 30,000 Legal Requirements for legal services are estimated at an annual expenditure of $30,000 and also cover such items as attendance at scheduled meetings of the Board of Supervisor's, contract preparation and review, etc. Total: $ 30,000 Audit The Districts are required to annually undertake an independent examination of its books, records and accounting procedures. This audit is conducted pursuant to State Law and rules of the Auditor General. Total: $ 11,000 Management The Districts retain the services of a consulting manager, who is responsible for the daily administration of the Districts' business, including preparation of the minutes of the Board of Supervisor's. In addition, the District Manager prepares the annual budgets, implements all policies of the Board of Supervisor's, and attends all meetings of the Board of Supervisor's. Total: $ 74,972 Total Professional Services: MNCDD Portion MSCDD Portion $o $o $7,977 $22,023 $7,977 $22,023 $2,925 $8,075 $19,935 $55,037 $38,814 $107,158 Mediterra North & South Community Development Districts 1 6! Budget Fiscal Year 2003 General Funds MNCDD Administrative Services Portion Accounting Services Total: $17,460 $4,643 Assessment Roll Preparation Tetah $3,000 $798 Travel & Per Diem Total: $600 $160 Telephone Total: $700 $186 Postage & Reproduction Totah $3,000 $798 Printing & 8inding Total: $1,500 $399 Legal Advertising Tetah $12,500 $3,324 Office Supplies Total: $550 $146 Subscriptions & Memberships Total: $350 $93 Insurance $3,457 The Districts carry Public Officials and General Uability Insurance with policies written by United National Insurance. The Umit of Liability for this coverage is set at $2,000,000. Total: $13,000 Contingencies Total: $1,000 $266 MSCDD Portion $12,817 $2,202 $44O $514 $2,202 $1,101 $9,176 $404 $257 $9,543 $734 Total Administrative Services: Field Management Services Other Contractual Services As part of the consulting managers contract, the Districts retain the services of a Field Manager. The Field Manager is responsible for the day to day field operations. These responsibilities include, but are not limited to, preparing and bidding of services and commodities, contract administration, hidng and maintaining qualified personnel, preparation and implementation of operating schedules and policies, insuring compliance with all operating permits, prepare field operating budgets, provide information/education to the public regarding District programs and attend Board meetings. This service is specific to both the Mediterra CDDs and is charged based on a fiat rate which is reviewed annually. Total: $21,540 The following are considered to be incidental to the daily operation of the District's Field Operation $14;268 $39,392 $5,727 $15,813 Telephone Total: $2,000 $532 $1,468 Office Supplies Total: $1,500 $399 $1,101 Subscriptions and Memberships Total: $100 $27 $73 Travel Total: $200 $53 $147 Operating Supplies Total: $3,200 $851 $2,349 Total Field Management Services: $7,589 $20,951 Mediterra North & South Community Development Districts Budget Fiscal Year 2003 General Funds Water Management Services Other Contractual Services The District contracts with a qualified contractor on an annual basis for the control of unwanted vegetation within the community's water management system and wetland areas that may otherwise become unsightly and impede the flow of water. Total: $202,996 Aquascaping This category covers the costs associated with the ongoing replacement and augmentation of the District aquatic plantings within it's water management system. Total: $50,000 Aeration - Capital This category covers d~e cost of installing aeration systems in certain lakes within the community as identified by District staff and various local agencies. Total: Aeration - Operating Supplies This category covers the cost of electricity and service repairs and maintenance to the Districts' existing aeration systems. $0 Miscellaneous This category covers any unforeseen costs. Total: $2,500 Total: $10,000 Total Water Management Services: Total Field Services: 161 1 MNCDD Portion MSCDD Portion $53,977 $149,019 $13,295 $36,705 $o $o $665 $1,835 $2,659 $7,341 $70,595 $194,901 $78,184 $215,852 Mediterra North & South Community Development Districts Budget Fiscal Year 2003 General Funds Other Fees & Charges Developer Collection Fee Pursuant to the contract, between Moyer and Associates and the District, Noyer and Associates charges and collects a fee for the collection of assessments that is equal to one (1) percent of the assessments collected. Tax Collector Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2003 assessments to be collected. The Tax Collector charges two (2) percent of the assessments collected. Property Appraiser Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2003 assessments levied. The Property Appraiser charges one (1) percent of the amount levied. Revenue Reserve Pursuant to State Law, the District is permitted to appropriate 96% of e~mated revenues, which will cover discounts and non-payment of assessments. Total Other Fees & Charges 161 1 MNCDD Portion MSCDD Portion $1,321 $2,197 $10 $3,115 $1,558 $20 $6,231 $1~357 $13,101 Total Appropriations $132r623 $375r503 8 Mediterra North Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 201- Series 2001 Bonds A & B Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2002 161 ! Revenues: Unappropriated Fund Balance Principal Prepayments Developer Contribution Assessment Levy Interest Income & Other Transfers Total Revenue Appropriations: Principal Prepayments Principal Retirement Interest Expense Admin & Other Fees Total Appropriations Net Income Actual Anticipated Total Budget Received or Expended Thru Fiscal Year FY 02 3/31/2002 9/30/2002 2002 Variance Favorable (UnfavorableI ($242,826) $0 $0 $0 $242,826 0 $14,148 $0 $14,148 $14,148 $1,695,855 $21,434 $1,827,523 $1,848,957 $153,102 $o $o $o $o $o $85,304 $14,171 $15,000 $29,171 ($56,133) $1,538,333 $49,753 $1,842,523 $1,892,276 $353,943 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 ($20,000) $390,000 $0 $390,000 $390,000 $0 $1,122,833 $449,133 $673,700 $1,122,833 $0 $25,500 $1,875 $23,625 $25,500 $0 $1,538,333 $451,008 $1,107,325 $1,558,333 ($20,000) $333,943 $0 $652,620 $2,212,937 $1,894,260 $o $652,620 $o Fund Balance September 30, 2001 (Actual) Reserved for Debt Service(All Years) Reserved for Adjustment to Cost/Market Reserved for Debt Service(Fiscal Year 2004): Principal on Bonds Due 11/1/03 Interest Expense Due 11/1/03 Unappropriated Fund Balance September 30, 2002 10 Mediterra North Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 201- Series 2001 Series A & B Revenues: Unappropriated Fund Balance- October 1, 2002 Assessment Levy Developer Contribution Interest Income & Other Transfers Appropriations: Debt Service: Principal Debt Retirement Principal Debt Prepayment Interest Expense Administrative: Accounting Services Trustee Arbitration Calculation Fee Dissemination Agent Special Assessment Preparation Other Fees & Charges Developer Collection Fee Tax Collector Property Appraiser Revenue Reserve Total Revenue: Total Debt Service: Total Administrative: Total Fees & Charges: $0 $3,600 $1,528,258 $28,414 $1,560,272 $210,000 $0 $1,319,520 $1,529,520 $4,500 $4,500 $1,500 $5,ooo $15,000 $30,500 $0 $72 $36 $144 $252 Total APpropriations: $1,560,272 11 Mediterra North Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 201- Series 2001 Series A & B Revenue Summary: Reserve Account: The Bond Resolution authorizing the issuance of the Series 2001 Bonds established this account and provides that the Bond Reserve Requirement shall be an amount equal to the maximum amount of principal installments and interest payable in any year on all bonds outstanding. The monies in the Reserve Account, to the extent of the bond reserve requirement, are not available for any purpose other than the payment of the principal installment and interest on the bonds Reserve Requirement $1,894,260 The Distdct has invested the reserve funds in the following: US Treasury Money Market 1.50% $1,894,260 $1,894,260 These investments are in accordance with those permitted as outlined in the Bond Indenture $28,414 Debt Service Accounts: The Bond Indenture authorizing the issuance of the Series 2001 Bonds established four (4) Debt Service Accounts to track the flow of funds from the receipt of monies through the Payment of Debt Service. The following are the accounts which have been established pursuant to the Bond Indenture. Description Interest Revenue Fund Interest Account Pre-Payment Account Sinking Fund $0 $o $o $o $0 $0 12 Mediterra North Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 201- Series 2001 Series A & B Appropriations Summary: Debt Service: Principal Prepayment - November 1, 2002 Principal Retirement - May 1, 2003 Total Principal Payments: Interest Expense for the period ending November 1, 2002 for the period ending November 1, 2002 for the period ending Nay 1, 2003 for the period ending May 1, 2003 Total Interest Expense: Administrative: Accounting Services $0 $21o,ooo $210,000 $604,860 $54,900 $604,860 $54,900 $1r319,520 Trustee The District has entered into a trustee agreement with First Union to handle all trustee matters concerning the 2001 Series Bonds. Arbitration Calculation Fee Dissemination Agent The District must comply with the requirements of Rule 15c2-12 of the SEC requiring periodic filing of informational data with the National Repositories. Special Assessment Preparation The District is required to prepare and maintain a special assessment roll (see attached exhibit) Total Administrative: 161 $1,529,520 1 $4,500 $4,5oo $1,500 $5,000 $15,000 $30,500 13 Mediterra North Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 201- Series 2001 Series A & B 1 Other Fees & Charges: Developer Collection Fee Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2003 Developer assessments not collected thru Collier County Tax Collector. The fee is one (1) percent of assessments collected. Tax Collector Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2003 Assessments to be collected. The Tax Collector's fees are two (2) percent of the assessments collected. Proper~y Appraiser Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2003 Assessments to be collected. The Property Appraiser's fees are one (1) percent of the assessments collected. $0 $72 $36 Revenue Reserve The District currently reserves, and State Law permits the District to appropriate 96% of estimated revenues, which will cover discounts and non payment of assessments. Total Other Fees & Charges $144 $252 $1,560,272 Total Appropriations 14 Mediterra North Community Development District Debt Service AmorllzatJon Schedule Series 2001 A Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds ReOular Principal Znterest Date Principal Prepa~fmenbs Expense 11/1/2001 $412,533.33 5/1/2002 $390,000.00 $20,000.00 $618,800.00 11/1/2002 $604,860.00 5/1/2003 $210,000.00 $604,860.00 11/1/2003 $597,720.00 5/1/2004 $225,000.00 $597,720.00 11/1/2004 $590,070.00 5/1/2005 $240,000.00 $590,070.00 11/1/2005 $581,910.00 5/1/2006 $255,000.00 $581,910.00 11/1/2006 $573,240.00 5/1/2007 $275,000.00 $573,240.00 11/1/2007 $563,890.00 5/1/2008 $295,000.00 $563,890.00 11/1/2008 $553,860.00 5/1/2009 $315,000.00 $553,860.00 11/1/2009 $543,150.00 5/1/2010 $335,000.00 $543,150.00 11/1/2010 $531,760.00 5/1/2011 $360,000.00 $531,760.00 11/1/2011 $519,520.00 5/1/2012 $380,000.00 $519,520.00 11/1/2012 $506,600.00 5/1/2013 $410,000.00 $506,600.00 11/1/2013 $492,660.00 5/1/2014 $435,000.00 $492,660.00 11/1/2014 $477,870.00 5/1/2015 $46.5,000.00 $477,870.00 11/1/2015 $462,060.00 5/1/2016 $495,000.00 $462,060.00 11/1/2016 $445,230.00 5/1/2017 $530,000.00 $445,230.00 11/1/2017 $427,210.00 5/1/2018 $565,000.00 $427,210.00 11/1/2o18 $4o8,ooo.oo 5/1/2019 $605,000.00 $408,000.00 11/1/2019 $387,430.00 5/1/2020 $645,000.00 $387,430.00 11/1/2020 $365,500.00 5/1/2021 $690,000.00 $365,500.00 11/1/2021 $342,040.00 5/1/2022 $735,000.00 $342,040.00 11/1/2022 $317,050.00 5/1/2023 $785,000.00 $317,050.00 11/1/2023 $290,360.00 5/1/2024 $840,000.00 $290,360.00 11/1/2024 $261,800.00 5/1/2025 $895,000.00 $261,800.00 11/1/2025 $231,370.00 5/1/2026 $960,000.00 $231,370.00 11/1/2026 $198,730.00 5/1/2027 $1,025,000.00 $198,730.00 11/1/2027 $163,880.00 5/1/2028 $1,095,000.00 $163,880.00 11/1/2028 $126,650.00 5/1/2029 $1,170,000.00 $126,650.00 11/1/2029 $86,870.00 5/1/2030 $1,245,000.00 $86,870.00 11/1/2030 $44,540.00 5/1/2031 $1,310,000.00 $44,540.00 totals Outstanding Prindlml $18,200,000.00 $18,200,000.00 $17,790,000.00 $17,790,000.00 $17,580,000.00 $17,580,000.00 $17,355,000.00 $17,355,000.00 $17,115,000.00 $17,115,000.00 $16,860,000.00 $16,860,000.00 $16,585,000.00 $16,585,000.00 $16,290,000.00 $16,290,000.00 $15,975,000.0{) $15,975,000.00 $15,640,000.00 $15,640,000.00 $15,280,000.00 $15,280,000.00 $14,900,000.00 $14,900,000.00 $14,490,000.00 $14,490,000.00 $14,055,000.00 $14,055,000.00 $13,590,000.00 $13,590,000.00 $13,095,000.00 $13,095,000.00 $12,565,000.00 $12,565,000.00 $12,000,000.00 $12,000,000.00 $11,395,000.00 $11,395,000.00 $10,750,000.00 $10,750,000.00 $10,060,000.00 $10,060,000.00 $9,325,000.00 $9,325,000.00 $8,540,000.00 $8,540,000.00 $7,700,000.00 $7,700,000.00 $6,805,000.00 $6,805,000.00 $5,845,000.00 $5,845,000.00 $4,820,000.00 $4,82o,ooo.oo $3,725,000.00 $3,725,000.00 $2,555,ooo.oo $2,s55,ooo.oo $1,310,000.00 $1,310,000.00 $o.oo $18,180,000.00 $20,000.00 $24t422,993.33 16{ 1 ',~iii~ Mediterra North Community Development District Debt Service AmortizaUon Schedule Series 2001 B Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds Regular Prindpal Interest O,.L~: -nding Date Principal Prepayments Expense Principal $1,830,000.00 11/1/200! $36,600.00 $1,830,000.00 5/1/2002 $54,900.00 $1,830,000.00 11/1/2002 $54,900.00 $1,830,000.00 5/1/2003 $54,900.00 $1,830,000.00 11/1/2003 $54,900.00 $1,830,000.00 5/1/2004 $54,900.00 $1,830,000.00 11/1/200~ $54,900.00 $1,830,000.00 5/1/2005 $54,900.00 $1,830,000.00 11/1/2005 $54,900.00 $1,830,000.00 5/1/2006 $54,900.00 $1,830,000.00 11/1/2006 $54,900.00 $1,830,000.00 5/1/2007 $54,900.00 $1,830,000.00 11/1/2007 $54,900.00 $0.00 5/1/2008 $1,830,000.{)0 161 3. totals $1~830f000.00 $0.00 $695,400.00 Mediterra outh Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 161 Debt Service Fund 201- Series 1999 Bonds A & B Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2002 1 Actual AnUcipated Total Budget Received or Expended Thru Fiscal Year FY 02 3/31/2002 9/30/2002 2002 Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) Revenues: Unappropriated Fund Balance $1,686,316 $0 $0 $0 ($1,686,316) Principal Prepayments $0 $759,213 $99,731 $858,944 $858,944 Developer Contribution $192,,107 $0 $192,,107 $192,,107 $0 Assessment Levy $32,1,219 $280,373 $,13,846 $32,1,219 $0 interest Income $7,1,125 $18,220 $18,000 $36,220 ($37,905) Total Revenue $2,277,067 $1,057,806 $353,98,1 $1,,111,790 ($865,277) Appropriations: Principal Prepayments $1,150,000 $1,760,000 $730,000 $2,,190,000 ($1,340,000) Principal Retirement $110,000 $0 $110,000 $110,000 $0 Interest Expense $961,467 $498,703 $443,318 $9,12,021 $19,4,17 Admin & Other Fees $55,600 $28,659 $26,941 $55,600 $0 Total Appropriations $2,277,067 $2,287,362 $1,310,259 $3,597,621 ($1,320,554) Net ]:ncome ($2,185,831) Fund Balance September 30, 2001 (Actual) Reserved for Debt Service(All Years) Reserved for Adjustment to Cost/Market Reserved for Debt Service(Fiscal Year 200,1): Principal on Bonds Due 11/1/03 Interest Expense Due 11/1/03 Unappropriated Fund Balance September 30, 2002 $0 $,106,069 $3,951,008 $1,172,678 $o $406,069 $186,431 15 Mediterra South Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 201- Series 1999 Series A & B 161 Revenues: Unappropriated Fund Balance- October 1, 2002 Assessment Levy Developer Assessment Interest Income & Other Transfers Total Revenue: $186,431 $347,400 $651,035 $17,592 $1,202,458 Appropriations: Debt Service: Principal Debt Retirement Principal Debt Prepayment Interest Expense Administrative: Accounting Services Trustee Dissemination Agent Arbitrage Rebate Calculation Special Assessment Preparation Other Fees & Charges Developer Collection Fee Tax Collector Property Appraiser Revenue Reserve Total Debt Service: Total Administrative: Total Fees & Charges: $115,000 $200,000 $826,380 $1,141,380 $5,000 $8,500 $5,000 $i,75o $io,ooo $30,250 $6,510 $6,948 $3,474 $13,896 $30,828 Total Appropriations: $1,202,458 16 Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 201- Series 1999 Series A & B Revenue Summary: Reserve Account: The Bond Resolution authorizing the issuance of the Series 1999 Bonds established this account and provides that the Bond Reserve Requirement shall be an amount equal to the maximum amount of principal installments and interest payable in any year on all bonds outstanding. The monies in the Reserve Account, to the extent of the bond reserve requirement, are not available for any purpose other than the payment of the principal installment and interest on the bonds Reserve Requirement $1,172,678 The D:~trict has invested the reserve funds in the following: US Treasury Money Market 1.50% $1,172,678 $1,172~678 These investments are in accordance with those permitted as outlined in the Bond Indenture Debt Service Accounts: The Bond Indenture authorizing the issuance of the Series 1999 Bonds established four (4) Debt Service Accounts to track the flow of funds from the receipt of monies through the Payment of Debt Service. The following are the accounts which have been established pursuant to the Bond Indenture. Description Interest Revenue Fund $0 Interest Account $0 Pre-Payment Account $0 Sinking Fund $0 $0 $17,592 $0 17 Mediterra South Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 201- Series 1999 Series A & B 161 Appropriations Summary: Debt Service: Principal Prepayment - November 1, 2002 Principal Retirement - May 1, 2003 $200,000 $115,000 Total Principal Payments: $315,000 Interest Expense for the pedod ending November 1, 2002 for the period ending November 1, 2002 for the period ending May 1, 2003 for the period ending May 1, 2003 $385,378 $30,938 $385,378 $24,688 Total Interest Expense: $826,380 Administrative: Accounting Services Trustee The District has entered into a trustee agreement with First Union to handle all trustee matters concerning the 1999 Series Bonds. Dissemination Agent The District must comply with the requirements of Rule 15c2-12 of the SEC requiring periodic filing of informational data with the National Repositories. Arbitrage Rebate Calculation The District is required to prepare Arbitrage Rebate Calculations for each Bond ]~ssue, in accordance with the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Special Assessment Preparation The District is required to prepare and maintain a special assessment roll. $1,141,380 $5,000 $8,500 $5,000 $1,750 $10,000 Total Administrative: $30,250 18 Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 20:L- Series :~999 Series A & B ! Other Fees & Charges: Developer Collection Fee Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2003 Developer assessments not collected through the Collier County Tax Collector. The fee is one (1) percent of assessments collected. Tax Collector Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2003 Assessments to be collected. The Tax Collector's fees are two (2) percent of the assessments collected. Property Appraiser Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2003 Assessments to be collected. The Property Appraiser's fees are one (1) percent of the assessments collected. Revenue Reserve The District currently reserves, and State Law permits the District to appropriate 96% of estimated revenues, which will cover discounts and non payment of assessments. Total Other Fees & Charges Total Appropriations $6,510 $6,948 $3,474 $13,896 $30,828 $1,202,458 19 Mediterra South Community Development District Debt Service AmorUzaUon Schedule Series 1999 A/B Capital improvement Revenue Bonds Regular Principal Interest Date Prindpal Prepayments Expense 5/1/2000 $0.0O $0.00 $827,434.38 11/1/2000 $0.00 $11,995,0O0.00 $992,921.25 5/1/2001 $0.00 $3,820,000.00 $618,077.50 1111/2001 $0.00 $1,760,000.00 $498,702.50 5/1/2002 $110,000.00 $730,000.00 (~143,317.50 11/1/2002 $0.0O $200,000.00 $416,315.00 5/1/2003 $115,000.00 $0.0O $410,065.00 11/1/20O3 $0.00 $0.00 $406,068.75 5/1/2004 $915,000.00 $0.00 $406,068.75 111112004 $0.00 $0.00 $377,037.50 5/1/20O5 $135,000.00 $0.00 $377,037.50 11/1/2005 $0.0O $0.0O $372,346.25 5/1/2006 $145,00O.00 $0.0O $372,346.25 11/1/2006 $0.00 $0.00 $367,307.50 5/1/2007 $155,000.00 $0.00 $367,307.50 11/1/2007 $0.00 $0.00 $361,921.25 5/1/2008 $165,000.00 $0.00 $361,921.25 11/1/2008 $0.00 $0.00 $356,187.50 5/1/2009 $175,0O0.00 $0.00 $356,187.50 11/1/2009 $0.00 $0.00 $350,106.25 5/1/2010 $190,000.00 $0.00 $350,106.25 11/1/2010 $0.0O $0.0O $343,503.75 5/1/2011 $200,000.00 $0.0O $343,503.75 11/1/2011 $0.00 $0.00 $336,553.75 5/1/2012 $215,000.00 $0.0O $336,553.75 11/1/2012 $0.00 $0.00 $329,082.50 5/1/2013 $230,000.00 $0.00 $329,082.50 11/1/2013 $0.00 $0.00 $321,090.00 5/1/2014 $245,000.00 $0.00 $321,090.00 11/1/2014 $0.00 $0.00 $312,576.25 5/1/2015 $265,000.00 $0.00 $312,576.25 11/1/2015 $0.00 $0.00 $303,367.50 5/1/2016 $280,000.00 $0.00 $303,367.50 11/1/2016 $0.00 $0.00 $293,637.50 5/112017 $300,000.00 $0.00 $293,637.50 11/1/2017 $0.00 $0.00 $283,212.50 5/1/2018 $320,000.00 $0.00 $283,212.50 11/1/2018 $0.00 $0.00 $272,092.50 5/1/2019 $345,000.00 $0.00 $272,092.50 11/1/2019 $0.00 $0.00 $260,103.75 5/1/2020 $365,00O.0O $0.00 $260,103.75 11/1/2020 $0.00 $0.00 $247,420.00 5/1/2021 $395,000.00 $0.00 $247,420.00 11/1/2021 $0.00 $0.00 $233,693.75 5/1/2022 $420,000.00 $0.00 $233,693.75 11/1/2022 $0.00 $0.00 $219,098.75 5/1/2023 $450,000.00 $0.00 $219,098.75 11/1/2023 $0.00 $0.00 $203,461.25 5/1/2024 $480,000.00 $0.00 $203,461.25 11/1/2024 $0.00 $0.00 $186,781.25 5/1/2025 $515,000.00 $0.00 $186,781.25 11/1/2025 $0.00 $0.00 $168,885.00 5/1/2026 $550,000.00 $0.00 $168,885.00 11/1/2026 $0.00 $0.00 $149,772.50 5/1/2027 $590,000.00 $0.00 $149,772.50 11/1/2027 $0.00 $0.00 $129,270.00 5/1/2028 $630,000.00 $0.00 $129,270.00 11/1/2028 $0.00 $0.00 $107,377.50 5/1/2029 $675,000.00 $0.0O $107,377.50 11/1/2029 $0.00 $0.00 $83,921.25 5/1/2030 $720,000.00 $0.00 $83,921.25 11/1/2030 $0.00 $0.00 $58,901.25 5/1/2031 $1,695,000.00 $0.00 $58,901.25 Outstanding Prindpal $30,495,0O0.00 $30,495,000.00 $18,5oo,0oo.oo $14,68o, ooo.oo $12,920,000.00 $12,080,000.00 $11,880,000.00 $11,765,000.00 $11,765,000.00 $10,850,000.00 $10,850,000.00 $10,715,000.00 $10,715,000.00 $10,S70,000.0O $10,570,000.00 $10,415,000.00 $10,415,000.00 $10,250,000.00 $1o,2so, ooo.oo $1o, o75,ooo.oo $10,075,000.00 $9,885,000.00 $9,885,000.00 $9,685,000.00 $9,685,000.00 $9,470,000.00 $9,470,000.00 $9,240,000.00 $9,240,000.00 $8,995,000.00 $8,995,00O:00 $8,730,000.00 $8,730,000.00 $8,450,000.00 $8,450,000.00 $8,150,000.00 $8,150,000.00 $7,830,000.00 $7,830,0O0.00 $7,485,000.00 $7,485,000.00 $7,120,000.00 $7,120,000.00 $6,725,000.00 $6,725,000.00 $6,305,00O.00 $6,305,000.00 $5,855,000.00 $5,855,000.00 $5,375,000.00 $5,375,000.00 $4,860,000.00 $4,860,000.00 $4,310,000.00 $4,310,000.00 $3,720,000.00 $3,720,000.00 $3,090,000.00 $3,090,000.00 $2,415,000.00 $2,415,000.00 $1,695,000.00 $1,695,000.00 $o.oo totals $11r990~000.00 $18~505~000.00 $19r076e388.13 161 Mediterra South Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 202- Series 200:L Bonds A & B Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2002 161 1 Actual AnUcipated Total Budget Received or Expended Thru Fiscal Year FY 02 3/31/2002 9/30/2002 2002 Variance Favorable (UnfavorableI Revenues: Unapprepdated Fund Balance ($61,519) $0 $0 $0 $61,519 Principal Prepayments $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Developer Assessment $415,595 $2,846 $405,397 $408,243 ($7,352) Assessment Levy $91,612 $115,031 $7,424 $122,455 $30,843 Interest Income $31,689 $19,392 $3,500 $22,892 ($8,797) & Other Transfers Total Revenue $477~377 $137,269 $416~321 $553r590 $76,213 Appropriations: Principal Prepayments $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Principal Retirement $120,000 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $0 Interest Expense $318,809 $127,524 $191,285 $318,809 $0 Admin & Other Fees $38,568 $14,681 $23,887 $38,568 $0 Total Appropriations $477,377 $142,205 $335,172 $477,377 $0 Net Income $76,213 Fund Balance September 30, 2001 (Actual) Reserved for Debt Service(All Years) Reserved for Adjustment to Cost/Market Reserved for Debt Service(Fiscal Year 2004): Principal on 8onds Due 11/1/03 Interest Expense Due 11/1/03 Unappropriated Fund Balance September 30, 2002 $0 $184r950 $549,235 $440,498 $o $184,950 $0 20 Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 202- Series 2001 Series A & B 1 Revenues: Unappropriated Fund Balance- October 1, 2002 Assessment Levy Developer Assessment Interest Income & Other Transfers Total Revenue: $0 $190,800 $276,312 $6,609 $473,722 Appropriations: Debt Service: Principal Debt Retirement Principal Debt Prepayment Int~estExpense Administrative: Accounting Services Trustee Dissemination Agent Arbitrage Rebate Calculation Special Assessment Preparation Other Fees & Charges Developer Collection Fee Tax Collector Property Appraiser Revenue Reserve Total Debt Service: Total Administrative: Total Fees & Charges: $65,000 $o $374,353 $439,353 $4,500 $3,500 $1,000 $1,750 $7,500 $18,250 $2,763 $3,816 $1,908 $7,632 $16,119 Total Appropriations: $473,722 21 Community Development District Budget fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 202- Series 2001 Series A & B Revenue Summary: Reserve Account: The Bond Resolution authorizing the issuance of the Series 2001 Bonds established this account and provides that the Bond Reserve Requirement shall be an amount equal to the maximum amount of principal installments and interest payable in any year on all bonds outstanding. The monies in the Reserve Account, to the extent of the bond reserve requirement, are not available for any purpose other than the payment of the principal installment and interest on the bonds Reserve Requirement $440,498 The D,o~rict has invested the reserve funds in the following: US Treasury Money Market 1.50% $440,~98 $440r498 These investments are in accordance with those permitted as outlined in the Bond Indenture Debt Service Accounts: The Bond Indenture authorizing the issuance of the Series 2001 Bonds established four (4) Debt Service Accounts to track the flow of funds from the receipt of monies through the Payment of Debt Service. The following are the accounts which have been established pursuant to the Bond Indenture. Descdotion Interest Revenue Fund Interest Account Pre-Payment Account Sinking Fund $0 $o $o $o $0 $6,609 $0 22 Community Development District Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 202- Series 2001 Series A & B Appropriations Summary: Debt Service: Principal Prepayment - November 1, 2002 Prindpal Retirement - May 1, 2003 $0 $65,000 Total Principal Payments: $65,000 Interest Expense for the period ending November 1, 2002 for the period ending May 1, 2003 $187,176 $187,176 Total Interest Expense: $374,353 Administrative: Accounting Services Trustee The District has entered into a trustee agreement with First Union to handle all trustee matters concerning, the 2001 Series Bonds. Dissemination Agent The Distdct must comply with the requirements of Rule 15c2-12 of the SEC requiring periodic filing of informational data with the National Repositories. Arbitrage Rebate Calculation The District is required to prepare Arbitrage Rebate Calculations for each Bond Issue, in accordance with the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Special Assessment Preparation The District is required to prepare and maintain a special assessment roll. Total Administrative: $439,353 $4,500 $3,500 $1,000 $1,750 $7,500 $18,250 23 Community Development District BudDer Fiscal Year 2003 Debt Service Fund 202- Series 2001 Series A & B Other Fees & Charges: Developer Collection Fee Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2003 Developer assessments not collected thru Collier County Tax Collector. The fee is one (1) percent of assessments collected. Tax Collector Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2003 Assessments to be collected. The Tax Collector's fees are two (2) percent of the assessments collected. $2,763 $3,816 Property Appraiser Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2003 Assessments to be collected. The Property Appraiser's fees are one (1) percent of the assessments collected. $1,908 Revenue Reserve The District currently reserves, and State Law permits the District to appropriate 96% of estimated revenues, which will cover discounts and non payment of assessments. Total Other Fees & Charges Total Appropriations $7,632 $16,119 $473,722 1 24 Mediterra South Community Development District Debt Service AmorUzation Schedule Series 200]. C~pital Zmprovement Revenue Bonds 161 Regular Principal Inter=st Date Principal Prepayments Expense 11/1/2001 $127,524.17 5/1/2002 $120,000.00 $191,286.25 11/1/2002 $187,176.25 5/1/2003 $65,000.00 $187,176.25 11/1/2003 $184,950.00 5/1/2004 $70,000.00 $184,950.00 111112004 $182,552.50 5/1/2005 $75,000.00 $182,552.50 11/1/2005 $179,983.75 5/1/2006 $80,000.00 $179,983.75 11/1/2006 $177,243.75 5/1/2007 $85,000.00 $177,243.75 11/1/2007 $174,332.50 5/1/2008 $90,000.00 $174,332.50 11/1/2008 $171,250.00 5/1/2009 $95,000.00 $171,250.00 11/1/2009 $167,996.25 5/1/2010 $100,000.00 $167,996.25 11/1/2010 $164,571.25 5/1/2011 $110,000.00 $164,571.25 111112011 $160,803.75 5/112012 $115,000.00 $160,803.75 11/1/2012 $156,865.00 5/1/2013 $125,000.00 $156,865.00 111112013 $152,583.75 5/1/2014 $135,000.00 $152,583.75 11/1/2014 $147,960.00 5/1/2015 $140,000.00 $147,960.00 11/1/2015 $143,165.00 5/1/2016 $150,000.00 $143,165.00 11/1/2016 $138,027.50 5/1/2017 $160,000.00 $138,027.50 11/1/2017 $132,547.50 5/1/2018 $175,000.00 $132,547.50 11/1/2018 $126,553.75 5/1/2019 $185,000.00 $126,553.75 11/1/2019 $120,217.50 5/1/2020 $200,000.00 $120,217.50 11/1/2020 $113, 367.50 5/1/2021 $210,000.00 $113,367.50 11/1/2021 $106,175.00 5/1/2022 $225,000.00 $106,175.00 11/1/2022 $98,468.75 5/1/2023 $240,000.00 $98,468.75 11/1/2023 $90,248.75 5/1/2024 $260,000.00 $90,248.75 11/112024 $81,:343.75 5/1/2025 $275,000.00 $81,343.75 11/1/2025 $71,925.00 5/1/2026 $295,000.00 $71,925.00 11/1/2026 $61,821.25 5/1/2027 $315,000.00 $61,821.25 11/1/2027 $51,032.50 5/1/2028 $335,000.00 $51,032.50 11/1/2028 $39,558.75 5/1/2029 $360,000.00 $39,558.75 11/1/2029 $27,228.75 5/1/2030 $385,000.00 $27,228.75 11/1/2030 $14,042.50 5/1/2031 $410,000.00 $14,042.50 Outstanding Principal $5,585,000.00 $5,585,000.00 $5,465,000.00 $5,465,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $5,400,000.00 $5,330,000.00 $5,330,000.00 $5,255,000.00 $5,255,000.00 $5,175,000.00 $5,175,000.00 $5,o9o, ooo.oo $s,o9o, ooo.oo $s,ooo,ooo.oo $s,ooo,ooo.oo $4,905,000.00 $4,905,000.00 $4,805,000.00 $4,805,000.00 $4,695,000.00 $4,695,000.00 $4,580,000.00 $4,580,000.00 $4,455,000.00 $4,455,000.00 $4,320,000.00 $4,320,000.00 $4,180,000.00 $4,180,000.00 $4,030,000.00 $4,030,000.00 $3,870,000.00 $3,870,000.00 $3,695,000.00 $3,695,000.00 $3,510,000.00 $3,510,000.00 $3,310,000.00 $3,310,000.00 $3,100,000.00 $3,100,000.00 $2,875,000.00 $2,875,000.00 $2,635,000.00 $2,635,000.00 $2,375,000.00 $2,375,000.00 $2,100,000.00 $2,100,000.00 $1,805,000.00 $1,805,000.00 $1,490,000.00 $1,490,000.00 $1,155,000.00 $1,155,000.00 $795,000.00 $795,000.00 $410,000.00 $410,000.00 $o.oo totals ~00 $0.00 ~;7r566~795.42 , , ~ , , ~ , , ~~ 000~00~00~~ 000~00~00~~ RESOLUTION 2002-6 A RESOLUTION LEVYING A DEBT SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE MEDITERRA SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the Mediterra South Community Development District finds that the assessment for operation and maintenance of the District during 2003 will amount to $ 155,764.00; and it is hereby determined that said maintenance is required within the District; WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the Mediterra South Community Development District finds that the assessment for debt service of the District during 2003 will amount to $347,400.00 (Series 1999) and $190,800.00 (Series 2001); and it is hereby determined that said debt service is required for the District; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE MEDITERRA SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; 1. That a maintenance assessment in the total sum amount of $155,764.00 and the same is hereby levied upon each tract or parcel of land within the Mediterra South Community Development District. 2. That a debt service assessment in the total sum amount of $347,400.00 (Series 1999) and $190,800.00 (Series 2001) and the same is hereby levied upon each tract or parcel of land within the Mediterra South Community Development District. 3. That the collection and enforcement of the aforesaid assessment shall be at the same time and in like manner as Collier County taxes. All assessments shall be subject to the same discounts as Collier County taxes. 4. That the said debt service and maintenance assessment levy and the lists of lands included in the District are hereby certified to the Collier County Property Appraiser to be extended on the County Tax Roll and shall be collected by the Collier County Tax Collector in the same manner and time as Collier County taxes. The proceeds therefrom shall be paid to the Mediterra South Community Development District. 1 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this Resolution be transmitted to the proper public officials so that its purpose and effect may be carried out in accordance with the law. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 2002, by the Board of Supervisors of the Mediterra South Community Development District, Collier County, Florida. Ja~es P. Ward Secretary Margaret ~ml~lidge Chairman RESOLUTION 2002-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE MEDITERRA SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT RATIFYING AND APPROVING ALL ACTIONS TAKEN BY KATHERINE C. GREEN PRIOR TO SUBSCRIBING TO AN OATH OF OFFICE WHEREAS, the Mediterra Community Development District hereafter referred to as District in accordance with the provisions of chapter 190 Florida Statutes did hold a landowners meeting on November 28, 2001 at which time Katherine C. Green was elected to the Board; and WHEREAS, Katherine C. Green did attend and participate in meetings held May 22, June 26, and July 24, 2002 prior to subscribing to an oath of office; and WHEREAS, Katherine C. Green has now subscribed to an oath of office; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LANDOWNERS AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE MEDITERRA SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; 1. It is the desire of the Board of Supervisors to ratify and approve all actions taken by the Board of Supervisors where Katherine C. Green was in attendance, which meetings were the May 22, June 26, and July 24, 2002 meetings which include but are not limited to the following items: Minutes of the February 27, 2002 meeting Resolution 2002-4 Approving the Budget and Setting the Public Hearing Minutes of the May 22, 2002 meeting Minutes of the June 26, 2002 meeting Adoption of the Budget and Levy of Non Ad Valorem Assessments for Fiscal Year 2003 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS, 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2002. Assistant Secretary 161 1 .ct_ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 r~ .~ H ~0o §§googOOoo ~ o o§§~°§°o o U o o o o U 0 Iu 0 03 H 121 o o §O§§o Q §§§ooo§§§§§§§§§o§§EE~o o o o §§~o~§§§~§ooo§~o~oO~§o o ~ ~ o~oo~§~°§§°°~§§~E§~ oo ~ ~°°~g°2~°°~°~°°°~°o ~ o~ ~ ~ .... §o~§ .... ~go§oo ~ 161 1 r.j o o ~oo~o~ lt-I X · 0 Ill ~oOO o o o o o o o 161 1 ~J ~ 0 0 §§§§§§§g2§§§°§§§§§o ~ o§o§§§g§§§§§o§§§o§ ~ o ~ §oo§o§o§§§§o§ogg§§oo o o o o §gg§ o o r.~ 4-1 0 ~oo~ooo~oo o §~§§§o§o§§O§~o §§§o§oo§o§OO~oooooo ~o ~ o 0 oo~oo§~§§~ ~§§§oooO§§o ooo o§§o oo !61 ~o§§~§§ooo~o§ §oo§§g§o§§~O§oo o o ~ o§§§oo§§§§§OOoo ~ o°§§§°§§g°§§§°o o o o ,§§oo 0 0 ~ ~ooO~§o~ o :§:o~o ~o:oo§~§o~ §o§§§§§OOOo o o o 0000000000 ~o~o§~~ o oo oo~§§§~§§§§o o ~oo§~o~ooo ~ ~ o ~§o~§§Z§§OOo oo o~ HHHHHZ~~ §§§oo§o§§§§oo o §§§§§§o§§§Oo o 161 1 ggg~go o ggggg : ggggg ~. gg§gg g§ gg g 0 0 0.) H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 ~ o U ~ ,< 0 0 ~ ~H ~ H~ H~ ~0 ~0~ 0 O0 o§o§§o 0 0 0 -ri o o 0 go g o r~ O~ 0 O0 §§ 161 o§ 0 ~0 H {J O0 O0 o o o o o o 16I Mediterra South COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 1999 A & B $30,495,000.00 For the Month Ended June 30, 2002 Source of Funds Construction Year to Date Total Overall Projects Amounts Paid / Year to Date Overall Received by Variance Budget Bond Funds (Fav.)- Unfav. Deposit to Construction Account Deposit to Cost of Issuance Deposit to Interest Account Deposit to 1999 A & B Reserve Account Underwriter's Discount Interest from Construction/Cost of Issuance Acct Total $24,344,152.59 $24,344,152.59 $0.00 $145,000.00 $ 145,000.00 $0.00 $3,419,052.55 $3,419,052.55 $0.00 $2,136,739.53 $2,136,739.53 $0.00 $457,425.00 $457,425.00 $0.00 $809,576.36 $809,576.36 $0.00 $31,311,946.03 $31,311,946.03 $0.00 Use of Funds Construction Year to Date Total Overall Projects Amounts Paid / Year to Date Overall Received by Variance Budget Bond Funds (Fav.)- Unfav. Costs of Issuance Underwriters Discount Bond Counsel- Nabors, Giblin, Nickerson Bond Underwriter- Prager, Mc Carthy & Sealy Financial Advisor- Fishkind & Associates Trustee Counsel - Holland & Knight Trustee Fee - First Union National Bank District Counsel- Young, vanAssenderp District Manager - Severn Trent Environ. Bond Printing - Bowne of Atlanta, Inc. Deposit to Interest Account Deposit to Reserve Account Total Costs of Issuance: $457,425.00 $457,425.00 $0.00 $42,743.25 $42,743.25 $0.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 $20,281.69 $20,281.69 $0.00 $5,25O.OO $5,250.00 $0.00 $9,648.75 $9,648.75 $0.00 $25,000.00 $25,00O.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $0.00 $6,280.00 $6,280.00 $0.00 $3,419,052.55 $3,419,052.55 $0.00 $2,136,739.53 $2,136,739.53 $0.00 $6,142,420.77 $6,142,420.77 $0.00 Use of Funds- (continued) Mediterra South COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 1999 A & B $30,495,000.00 161 1 Construction Year to Date Total Overall Projects Amounts Paid / Year to Date Overall Received by Variance Budget Bond Funds (Fav.)- Unfav. Project Description Water Management Consulting Fees Utilities ROW Improvements Perimeter Landscaping Recreation & Parks Wetland Mitigation Off Site Improvem~.~ts Technical Fees Land Acquisitions Total Costs Acquisition Agreement #1 TRANSFER TO PREPAYMENT ACCOUNT PER LOAN DOCUMENTS Future Projects $6,168,539.83 $6,168,539.83 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $2,003,876.95 $2,003,876.95 $0.00 $473,341.34 $473,341.34 $0.00 $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $196,287.15 $196,287.15 $0.00 $5,630,965.04 $5,630,965.04 $0.00 $1,282,624.87 $1,282,624.87 $0.00 $5,522,125.00 $5,522,125.00 $0.00 $21,277,760.18 $21,277,760.18 $0.00 $3,589,500.00 $3,589,500.00 $0.00 $581,986.10 Total Expenditures Funds Remaining $28,002,167.05 $31,009,680.95 $302,265.08 Reconciliation to Bank Statement: Construction Account at 6/30/02 Cost of Issuance Account at 6/30/02 Total Funds Available $302,265.08 $o.oo $302,265.08 161 Mediterra South COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2001 $5,585,000.00 For the Month Ended June 30, 2002 Source of Funds Construction Year to Date Total Overall Projects Amounts Paid / Year to Date Overall Received by Variance Budget Bond Funds (Fay.) - Unfav. Deposit to Construction Account Deposit to Cost of Issuance Deposit to Interest Account Deposit to Reserve Account Underwriter's Discount Interest from Construction/Cost of Issuance Acct Total $4,826,260.01 $4,826,260.01 $0.00 $135,000.00 $135,000.00 $0.00 $120,993.01 $120,993.01 $0.00 $440,497.50 $440,497.50 $0.00 $78,190.00 $78,190.00 $0.00 $9,963.97 $9,963.97 $0.00 $5,610,904.49 $5,610,904.49 $0.00 Use of Funds Construction Year to Date Total Overall Projects Amounts Paid / Year to Date Overall Received by Variance Budget Bond Funds (Fav.)- Unfav. Costs of Issuance Underwriters Discount Bond Counsel- Nabors, Giblin, Nickerson Bond Underwriter- Prager, Mc Carthy & Sealy Financial Advisor- Fishkind & Associates Trustee Counsel - Holland & Knight Trustee Fee - First Union National Bank District Counsel- Young, vanAssenderp District Manager- Severn Trent Environ. Bond Printing - Bowne of Atlanta, Inc. Deposit to Interest Account Deposit to Reserve Account $78,190.00 $78,190.00 $0.00 $42,145.25 $42,145.25 $0.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $12,341.60 $12,341.60 $0.00 $3,750.00 $3,750.00 $0.00 $4,531.51 $4,531.51 $0.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $0.00 $4,065.00 $4,065.00 $0.00 $120,993.01 $120,993.01 $0.00 $440,497.50 $440,497.50 $0.00 Total Costs of Issuance: $747,513.87 $747,513.87 $0.00 Use of Funds- (continued) Mediterra South COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2001 $5,585,000.00 161 ! Construction Year to Date Total Overall Projects Amounts Paid / Year to Date Overall Received by Variance Budget Bond Funds (Fav.)- Unfav. Project Description Water Management Consulting Fees Utilities ROW Improvements Perimeter Landscaping Recreation & Parks Wetland Mitigation Off Site Improvements Technical Fees Land Acquisitions Total Costs Acquisition Agreement #1 $1,427,310.06 $1,427,310.06 $0.00 $16,115.48 $16,115.48 $0.00 $1,084,210.60 $1,084,210.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $44,725.00 $44,725.00 $0.00 $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $49,402.87 $49,402.87 $0.00 $2,241,400.00 $2,241,400.00 $0.00 $4,863,164.01 $4,863,164.01 $0.00 $5,610,677.88 $5,610,677.88 Total Expenditures Funds Remaining $226.61 Reconciliation to Bank Statement: Construction Account at 6/30/02 Cost of Issuance Account at 6/30/02 $226.61 $o.oo Total Funds Available $226.61 MEMORANDUM Misc. Correspondence Agenda Date Agenda Item # TO: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners FROM: Derek Johnssen, General Accounting Manager Clerk of the Circuit Court/Finance Department DATE: RE: October 31,2002 Miscellaneous Correspondence - BCC Agenda Please place the following items on the next available BCC agenda and call me at extension 8350 with the date and Miscellaneous Correspondence agenda item number. PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMLINITY IMPROVFMI=_NT DISTRICT Pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapters 189 and 190, Port of the Islands Community Improvement District, has submitted the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Minutes of Meeting held September 20, 2002 Auditor's Report FY Ended 9/30/01 Management Letter Response to Management Letter Financial Report dated September 20, 2002 Thank you :\special\special Port of the Islands Community Improvement District ~10 N. University Dr. · Coral Springs, Florida $$071 · Telephone: (954) 755-0580 · Fax: (954) 755-6185 161 1 October 25, 2002 Memorandum To: Reference: From: Clerk of the Circuit Court c/o Derrick Johnssen 2671 Airport Road, Court Plaza III P.O. Box 415016 Naples, Florida S~112-$016 Jim Mudd Collier County Manager Governmental Center SSOl East Tamiami Trail Administration Building Naples, Florida $4112 David Black Hoch, Frey & Zugman {875 North Federal Hwy., +th Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida ~08-~610 Tim Stephens Port of the Islands C.I.D. 12600 Union Road Naples, Florida $4,1 Minutes of Meeting held September 20, 2002 Darrin Mossing Manager Enclosed for your records is a copy of the referenced minutes held by the Board of Supervisors of Port of the Islands Community Improvement District and approved at their September 20, 2002 meeting. Please note that at this time we do not have a signed copy of the Contract with Big Cypress Landscape Company, therefore this contract will be mailed to you under a separate cover. Should you have any questions or comments do not hesitate to contact Jennifer McC0nnell at 95~-796-6658. jm MINUTES OF MEETING PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Port of the Islands Community Improvement District was held Friday, September 20, 2002, 25000 Tamiami Trm], Naples, Florida. Present and constituting a quorum were John Robinson Bermrd Wolsky Ted Bis sell Richard Burgeson at 10:00 a.m. at the Egret Roon~ Supervisor Vice Chairman Supervisor (via photo) Assistant Secretary Also present were Darrin Mossing Daniel Cox Ronald Benson Tim Stephens Numerous residents District Manager District Counsel District Engineer Field Manager The following are the actions taken at the September ~o, 2002 meeting. A copy of the tape recording of the meeting is on file at the District office. FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS Mr. Wolsky called the meeting to order. quorum was present. Roll Call Mr. Mossing called the roll and indicated a SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS Attorney/Client Session Mr. Cox stated that since Mr. Gatti was not going to be here today, I decided that we would wait and have this session at the next meeting, so we will just continue that item We did have a pre-trial contbrence yesterday, and the judge has set trial for the proceedings for January 15, 16 and 17. It will be at the Federal Courthouse in Fort Myers. Mr. Wolsky asked ~vhat happens at that timer Mr. Cox responded that is the real dog and pony show. September ~o, ~o0~ Mr. Wolsky asked what do you mean;> show. Port of the Islands Community Improvement District I thought the last one was the real do~g an~d !ony Mr. COx stated nowit is the real one. We will be calling witnesses and calling the full trial on the merits of the case The judge will issue a ruling probably within sixty days aPrer that, somewhere around the middle of March we should be all done Mr. Mossing asked on the attorney/client session, are we continuing that or will we have to re-advertise? Mr. Cox responded we will re-advertise it. THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS Approval of Minutes of August 16, ~00~ Meeting Mr. Wolsky stated the next item is the approval of the minutes of the August 16 meeting. I will entertain a motion. [[ ON MOTION by Mr. Bissell, seconded by Mr. Robinson, with all in favor, II the minutes of the August 16, ~00~ meeting were approved. FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Acceptance of Engineer's Annual Report Mr. Wolsky asked is this a continuation since last timeO Mr. Benson responded yes. That was I think an opportunity for the Board to review the report sumrmrized briefly last meeting. Mr. Wolsky asked does anyone have any questions about the report? Mr. Bissell mentioned several iterm that he would like to get together withyoujust for clarification at~erward. Mr. henson responded OK. the Engineer's Annual Report was accepted. ON MOTION by Mr. Burgeson, seconded by Mr. Bissell, with all in favor, September Port of the Islands Community Improvement District Mr. 1Mossing stated Mr. Chairman, encbsed in your agenda package was a copy of the ]District's audited financial statements from the District's independent audkor, Hock Frey and Zugnmn. V~hat I would like to do is highlight some o£the required reports, and i£the Board has any questions abou~ any of the spedfic numbers, ! would be happy to m~swer those and keep in n~nd that you are just accepting this report. You are not approving it. Mr. Wolsky asked what do you mean~ Mr. Mossing responded you are accepting it on behalf of the District. You are not approving it. Mr. Wolsky asked we are not agreeing with what he says; is that what you are saying? Mr. Mossing responded not necessarily. Mr. Burgeson stated we are not agreeing or disagreeing. Mr. Mossing stated yes, you are just accepting that Let me go through this. On Page S is the independent auditor's report. The third paragraph stales in our opinion the general purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material respects the financial position ofthePortofthe Island's Comn~nity Improvement District as of September sOO 1, and the results of its operations and cash flows; of its water and sewer enterprise fund for the year-end; and conbrming with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Basically, it is a clean opinion that they believe that these numbers accurately reflect our financial position. Then you have the various balance sheets, income statements of the District. If I could ask you to turn to the back starting on Page SS, there are various disclosures that the auditor is required to make The first one is to start on Page ss. The first item is compliance. The last sentence states the results of our test disclosed no instance of non-compliance that are required to be reported under the government auditing standards. The next one is the internal control over financial reporting. Again, the last sentence states that we noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operations that ~ve consider to be material weakness. Then on Page s~, this is the independent auditor's management letter. Basically, this is where they take the opportunity to report to the Board any iter~ that may be immaterial or that September fl0, fl00~ Port of the Islands Conumnity Improvement District they feel necessary that should be disclosed to the Board of Supervisors, there are numerous findings and recommendations, but basically they are all related to, as the Board is aware of, our assessments, our collection problem with our assessments and the financial emergency that the District finds itsdfin as it relates to the repayment of the bonds. Currently our operating funds all have positive cash flows and we are meeting all of our current obligations. The difficulty the District has is collecting its assessments on certain property owners and the payment of the District's bond indebtedness as it relates to those specific properties. Mr. Bissell asked when are we going to start repaying the road fund that Mr. Benson was alluding to, the $68,oo0, and they borrowed those funds to pay other bills? Mr. Mossing responded no. We have that money sitting in the account. In my discussions with Mr. Benson, what we wan~ed to do is put off the starting of that road project until next sunumr because we may need to borrow those funds as part of the completion of the irrigation project. As you recall, we signed an $185,000 contract for which technically we only had available $150,0oo. So there was $$5,000 that may need to be borrowed in the short-term to repay that If we did borrow those funds, I would pf recommend to take it from the roadway reserve. We then simultaneously increased our irrigation rates to replenish those funds. We have not borrowed the money yet, and there is a chance depending on how our utility fund goes, and the collection of standby fees that there is a chance that we might not need to borrow that money. We should be in a position to start the roadway improvement project this time next year. Mr. Wolsky stated one of the recommendations that I sort of focused on was that they had recommended in the past, the auditors had recommended in the past, that we increase our usage rates. They point out that while we increased our standby fees 58 percent, we have not increased our usage rates. They sortofmake a judgment about that that we should increase our usage rates. What sort of credence do you give to that~ Mr. Mossing stated I at this point do not agree with the auditors in their position on that When we set those standby rates, I worked with Mr. Benson and Mr. Stephens and we took our water and sewer budget and we broke it down betv~en the fixed cost, which would be covered by standby and our variable cost, which I attribute to the user fees. Those are things like utilities and a September ~0, ~0o~ Port of the Islands Comrmnity Improvement District large portion of the District's water operating expenditures is fixed, e ,~w~ic [ 1 The salaries and administrative budget make up a large part of our budg h re fixed cost I did not necessarily agree with him and we went back and forth on that He felt it was necessarily to place it in the audk. I just told him that we would continue, as we have with this Board keeping you apprised of the financial condition of the utilities and of our cash flow. I do not necessarily agree with that at this point, but will again continue to look at that Our cash flow, I believe at the end of this year, we budgeted for a $95,000 reserve. I think that we are probably going to end up with about $45,000 to $50,000 of that in the reserve at the end of this year. The engineers really recommended 895,000, but to have $50,000 in the reserve I do not think would call for an immediate increase in user fees. The only reason that we are not putting the $~5,000 in there is because we have a collection problem. I do not think we have a rate problem. Eventually those collection problems are anticipated to be resolved; we are going to have a lot of funds flowing into the District's various funds at that time Mr. Bissell stated are we going to have to foreclose on some properties? Mr. Mossing stated yes. I think in either case that that cash flow problem is going to be resolved. If those properties are foreclosed on, they will then be technically - and these are steps you get into a legal issue - but basically the property would be in the District's ownership debt free, and then I believe would be more marketable and developable in the future. The future property owner would be able to sustain the rate structure the District has in place. Mr. Wolsky asked any other questions? accept. Mr. Mossing stated if the Board doesn't have any questions, we will ask for a motion to ON MOTION by Mr. Robinson, seconded by Mr. Bissell, with all in favor, the Audit for Fiscal Year ~001 was accepted. SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS StaffReports A. Attorney (There being none, the next agenda itemwas addressed.) September ~o, ~00~ Port of the Islands Comnmnity Improvement District B. Engineer 161 ~ Mr. Benson stated I received a letter for the Islands Resort and Marina regarding a drainage pipe that has caved in over by the marina area It is a pipe that runs from a catch basin that is in the swale along the side of the road It is the outlet pipe that goes over to the canal. That wall is over by the dock I viewed that and inspected that Mr. Stephens and I talked. Mr. Stephens talked informally with someone who does the construction activity. He also made a couple phone calls to get prices for the pipe We still have not got the full assessment here yet, but it looks like it would be probably greater than $5,000 and less than $10,00o to replace this, depending on howlong of a section of pipe I think it could be may end up being at least $5,0o0. Now that I know exactly what the pipe is, what the condition is, my feeling is that that is partofthe drainage system for the CID, but I do need to verify with the documents in my office. We have the easement, where that pipe is located and again I will need to check this and also check it with Mr. Cox. My understanding woukt be, that that is part of the drainage system of the District. Then the question is; is there a legal document that says that we own that pipe and can do maintenance on that pipe I am going to need to talk to Mr. Cox about that As of this time, without the verification, it looks like a part of the system of the CID and would require our maintenance Mr. Wolsky asked you will proceed with that depending on what you find out? Mr. Benson responded yes, I guess we need some type of authorization for Mr. Stephens to be able to arrange to have the work done Mr. Mossing stated I think if the Board is in agreement with the District to move forward with that work, I think that is sufficient. I would, maybe if you wanted a motion, that would certainly be acceptable and that maybe if you said if it is not to exceed a dollar amount. Mr. Benson stated it is ~{-inch corrugated pipe The pipe there is metal, which with the seawater, salt water, has caused it to eventually cave in, you know the pipe will corrode. It would be rep]aced ~vith plastic material that is now available and serves the same purpose. That pipe is less than $1~ a foot Mr. Stephens made two phone calls for a price and they were both less than $1~. The question is how many feet It could be S0 feet up to maybe ~oo or soo feet, depending if you have to repress the whole section. Mr. Stephens got a price for the whole September 20, 2002 Port of the Islands Community Improvement Dislrict thing. 161 1 Mr. Stephens stated for about $~,500 for the work itsdf. Mr. Benson sta~ed and that partly is dependent on how long of a section, but them is some minimum involved in that because the part that is caved in is close to the sea walk which would be a little more expensive. Mr. Wolsky asked do you want to motion? Mr. Benson responded I would say it is going to be at least $5,0oo. Mr. Bissell asked did I miss the reason of the failure? Mr. Benson responded because thepipe is in excess. It is older than twenty years and it is corrugated metal pipe and it is exposed to salt water because it drains into a salt water area, so it is just part oft he system that will eventually happen at some point and would have to be replaced. Mr. Burgeson asked would it be possible to connect the metal pipe to plastic pipe~ Mr. Benson responded yes, this is drainpipe. Mr. Mossing asked do we have many more of these types of structures throughout the District? Mr. Benson responded well I need numbers. A lot of the pipe is concrete, but there is some that is metal mostly concrete under the roads. It is difficult at this point to say. There is not that many that the District has that actually go out to the canal. Mr. Stephens stated I know of three. Mr. Benson stated I think there are about three of these pipes or connections that actually drain the water out to the canal. Mr. Stephens stated there are five Mr. Benson asked is it five> Mr. Stephens responded yes. Mr. Benson stated I could think of three, but there may be three more It is one of those things that will happen over the years and when they get replaced, we recommend that they get replaced with material that doe not have the corrosion but those materials were not available 20-R5 years ago when it was put in. Mr. Bissell asked how Mr. Stephens is going to do this workP Mr. Benson responded he had received a price for someone to do it. That is also an option; I 7 September ~0, ~00~ Port of the Islands Community Improvement District guess he would have equipment. Mr. Bissell asked if we have other corrugated pipe that is going to rust out, would it not be cheaper now to do the whole job at once than to do it piecemeal? Mr. Benson responded that is the reason why I was giving you a price that would potentially be rephcing the entire length from the catch basin out to the sea wall, which would be somewhere more than $5,000. I think our first estimate would be $6,000 or $7,000 if you rep]ace the entire section. I mean I am not sure I would reconunend going and just finding all the other ones. Mr. Bissell stated no, but in that area Mr. Benson stated that is why I want to do a little more inspection other than what I was able to do this morning. I guess one potential motion would be to authorize an expenditure not to exceed some amount of money. Then I would hand this over to my company to work with Mr. Stephens to get the thing done Mr. Bissell stated I move we allot no more than $6,000 to that project. Mr. Wolsky asked would that be sufficient? Mr. Stephens responded I do not know until we start opening the pipe Mr. Bissell stated then them is no need to make a motion to start witk Mr. Mossing stated that we could determine that this falls under our norrml repairs. Mr. Benson stated the entire length to do the whole job is more like $7,500 if it is the whole length. I mean again, we are not sure of the condition of the whole entire thing. Mr. Bissell stated if it is in the maintenance just go ahead and do it. Mr. Benson stated that would be hiring somebody to do the construction. Mr. Burgeson asked howdeep is the height? Mr. Benson responded it is ~-inch pipe and it is not like a few feet of cover so. It is probably five feet depth of digging. Mr. Stephens stated we could not do that in-house. It would too much for us. It would need to be done quickly because of the tides. It is waytoo muchfor us takeon. We have got a couple of plants to operate on here Mr. Bissell stated go ahead and do it then It is maintenance Mr. Mossing stated I think we can just do it as norrml. The Board is in concurrence that September 520, ~00~ Port of the Islands Community Improvement District the work needs to be done Mr. Stephens can handle it under his norlml repairs an [, ( te[ance'[ Mr. Benson stated one thing I would say it probably is a rule of check. I have made copies of the easements. We will make sure that there is an easement in that area If there is not, I would get one from Mr. Cox, as there should be. It is an outlet for our drainage system. Mr. Wolsky asked do you have anything else? Mr. Benson stated no. Mr. Wolsky asked let me ask a question thett At the last meeting you were anticipating approval of the perrrit momentarily? Mr. Benson responded thank you. I submitted a revised application after the last meeting. The DEP would have another week on their time clock to review that We have been making phone calls. Basically what we propose at this point, or to try to comply with this rule that kind of does not make a lot of sense for our application, but what we have suggested is that we would install a chlorine bleach feed system at the irrigation pump station. That would work when the pump comes on, there would be a 55-gallon drum of liquid bleach, which is a way to feed chlorine. A little feed pump would come on and inject the bleach into the pipe at the same time the water is being pumped. The intention would be disinfecting that water. It is basically a way of not only keeping the cost low and try to get DEP there to say we are complying with the intent of the rule, even though it is not 100 percent to the letter. As I said before, complying 100% to the letter could cost halfa million dollars. I was hoping to hear by this meeting. We have called and they have not returned our call. Mr. Mossing stated we are running out of time Mr. Benson stated and we are running out of time Mr. Mossing asked should we file for another extension on that grant? Mr. Benson responded I always think that is a possibility, with Mr. Tier, at Cypress Basin. Mr. Benson stated I wish I had a solution. I think we are getting close, but some of it does not make a lot of sense and obviously they knowyou do not have the money just to throw money at something that would comply with a rule that they are not even sure they agree witk Mr. Robinson asked what do they estimate the operating cost of the bleach system? Mr. Benson responded it would not be that expensive. I wish I had something else to tell you. At this point, we have made a number of phone calls in the last week and have not gotten a September 90, flOOfl Port of the Islands Community Improvement District return phone call ~ ~. ~ Mr. Cox stated until they have taken action to really know. I mean if they deny our application then of course we have recourse through the administrative hearing process to take that Until they make a final agency action, I do not have any place to get involved. Mr. Benson stated that is what I have been trying to push this month is that we have given you everything. This is all we are giving you. Approve it or turn it dowr~ I was hoping based on the last meeting I had with them in their office that they coukt approve this. We were trying to comply with the intent of the rule Mr. Wolsky stated I think it is absolutely crazy to have the Southwest Florida Management District declare a policy to do thing in this fashion and to reward us with federal grants for pursuing that course of action, and then to have another branch of the stall government come in and say that is not possible. To me that is a house divided against itself and it is going to fall I mean that is absolutely stupid, certifiably stupid in my opinion, but what do you do? Mr. Wolsky asked is there anything else~ Mr. Benson responded there was one other item that was brought up at the last meeting. It was a question about a drainage feature. Over at Stella Maris, there is a little dip as you cross. As that is part of the drainage feature for that road, the way the roads are there is a catch basin on one correr, but not on both, and that is a continuation of the curb and gutter that is along the road that gets the water across that road into that catch basin. That is a standard detail for subdivisions in this part of the country. After it was brought up at the meeting, I did go over and look at it. It is a standard detail. I would also, when I went home the same day to where I live - I live in North Naples in Longshore Lake Community - and I crossed the same type of thing in my own subdivision that I live in. I had not even realized that I was driving over that same feature, but I have seen it throughout the comrmnity now that it was brought to my attention. Mr. Burgeson stated you will notice that in a few more years when you get more time on your hands. Mr. Benson stalld I drive over it multiple times a day. It is like the same thing. Mr. Wolsky stated you will also be able to watch the grass grow, name the blades. Mr. Benson stated it is something that should not be filled in, and that was the request to fill lO September co, 2002 it in. Port of the Islands Cornnmnity Improvement District 161 Mr. Bissell stated the County said that it could be reconstructed there. It could be a four foot wide so it is not a sharp dip. It coukl be wide until about four feet, you know, with a slope. This is what they told me about four or five months ago. Mr. Benson stated I personally would not see an engineering reason to make a change. Mr. Burgeson stated they just need to slow down These people are driving too fast Mr. Benson stated it is sortofthe opposite of a speed bump;, it is a dip. Mr. Burgeson stated traffic calming device. Only bottoms out Lincolns. Mr. Bissell stated there is a problem. You see it should never have been there. The county said they never would have approved that road, that being them, if they knew that at the time That is the county engineer, Tom Cooke and Dick Roll_ I do not know if you know those gentlemen. Mr. Benson stated I suppose them are always other options that could have been done One woukt have been to have another catch basin and a pipe under the road contacting two catch basins, but it does not - in this area it is not as cormmn because we have such high ground water and things that most of the source water is taken care of on the sur~ce. ! mean there is a standard feature throughout subdivisions in this part of the state. C. Manager Mr. Mossing stated I have one item Last month the Board autlmrized us to go out to bid for the landscape maintenance contract. After that meeting and talking to Mr. Stephens I realized that they have raised the threshold for bidding for the community development districts - local governments. I wanted to come back to the board because Mr. Stephens said that the existing contractor is willing to hold this price for three years. If the Board would be interested, rather than going out for bid and potentially getting another contractor out here that does not perBrm as well, and everyone is happy with Big Cypress, would the Board rather continue on with Big Cypress at their same price or to actually go out to bid. Mr. Bissell stated I think we should do anything we canto keep what we have Mr. Burgeson stated Big Cypress does a good job. Mr. Bissell stated they do a good job. Mr. Wolsky stated I have never signed a plan Is there any legal reason why we cannot do 11 September ~0, ~oo~ this? Cox. Port of the Islands Community Improvement District Mr. Bissell stated because the ones we had before, we had a lot of complaints. Mr. Mossing stated I think he reviewed last contract two years ago, but I will get with Mr. Mr. Bissell asked are you talking about a three-year contract? Mr. Mossing responded two or three year. It will have a thirty-day ternination clause in it so that if, for whatever reason we are unhappy, we terminate. Currently we have 9o-day terrrination clause. Mr. Bissell stated and you will hold the price for three years? Great. Mr. Mossing stated I need a motion from the board to enter into a contract with Big Cypress for a three-year contract at the existing price. ON MOTION by Mr. Bissell, seconded by Mr. Burgeson, with all in favor, the acceptance to enter into a contract with Big Cypress for a three-year contract at existing price was approved. D. Field Manager Mr. Stephens stated everything that I have has been taken care of. SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Supervisor's Requests and Audience Comments An audience member stated I want to talk about drainage. On the cu]-de-sacs over there in Phase II, on the end of all those cul-de-sacs where they loop around, there is a lot of growth buikling up on those things. The flow going through those drainage areas is probably a shoulder job, not a machine job. That should be looked at I would say just to help our drainage down in that area You know where I am talking about? Mr. Stephens stated we will look at it. Mr. Wolsky stated just an item as I was going through the engineer's report, there were a number of drawings of the community, the standard drawing and you know there is a discrepancy between reality and the drawing. On Phase II, all the Cays and then three lots on the cd-de-sac, and September ~o, ~o0~ that is not the way it is. the Phase I plans. plan. Port of the Islands Community Improvement District ~dl~ }n an~ 4 There are only two lots on the cul-de-sac, on the point. It r t th two lots. It is the representation on the drawing is three lots. how they count those. Mr. Benson stated we will get that out and re-verify it. Mr. Wolsky stated we need to redo the property tax assessment. assessment should go up then if them are only two. Mr. Benson stated we could always correct that I thot~ght that was taken right from the We will verify and correct that Mr. Wolsky stated well you know, I mean, I live in Venus Cay and my cul-de-sac ends in So where the extra lot comes in and The property tax EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Financial Statements Mr. Bissdl stated the financial statements look fine as far as I am concerned. over everything pretty well and I do not know why, but they look pretty good I have gone ON MOTION by Mr. Bissell, seconded by Mr. Burgeson, with all in favor, the invoices were approved. Mr. Wolsky stated let tne just introduce Jerry Worden. Mr. Vdorden stated I am an inner over outsider. I am not one of you at this point. Mr. Wolsky stated he is potentially interested in doing something in the comn~nity here, butI do not knowifit is appropriate to discuss that I would guess not. Mr. Worden asked does anybody have an aerial photo that shows the north part north of 417 I have seen several aerial pictures that show the south, real nice view down to the gulf If there such a thing, does anybody have one that looks out to the norhh on an aerial photo. Mr. Wolsky responded what you are interested in is a slant. Mr. Benson stated I think I do. Mr. Burgeson stated all right. Mr. Bissell could crawl up that tower and take a picture. Mr. Wolsky stated but he is not interested in the overhead photography that Andy has. 15 Seplember eo, ~00~ Port of the Islands Community Improvement Dislrict Mr. Stephens staled the County has that on the Internet now. All you have to the Internet. You can see that Mr. Worden staled thatis the straight overhead, not an aerial photo. I want a slant thing like you have on your phombook and the postcards that looks south that kind of depict the feel of the place a whole lot better than just a rather sterile, straight-down view. When they had the auction for the convention center, there were a couple photos on that brochure they gave out; one looking somewhere north of the convention center looking south; and then another one looking a little off`to the northwest, but none depicted the ~vhole area Mr. Burgeson staled we have had some aerials taken. I have to look I might have Mr. Benson staled a couple of companies take those photos. Mr. Wolsky staled I can get in touch with him by E-Mail. Mr. Benson staled One Minute Aerial Markings. One Minute Aerials is the name of the company. They have an office up at the airport in Naples. You can hire them for a couple hundred dollars to take a bunch of pictures. NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment ON MOTION by Mr. Bissell, seconded by Mr. Burgeson, with all in favor, II the meeting was adjourned. Secretary / Assistant Secretal5l/ Chairman / Vice Chairman Friday September ~o, ~OOe lO:OO a.m. Agenda Port of the Island Community Improvement District 1. Roll Call Attorney / Client Session Approval of the Minutes of the August 16, ~009. Meeting Acceptance of Engineer's Annual Report 5. Acceptance of the Audit for Fiscal Year 2001 161 1 Egret Room ~5ooo Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 6. Staff Reports a. Attorney b. Engineer c. Manager d. Field Manager 7. Supervisor's Requests and Audience Comments 8. Financial Statements and Approval of Check Register 9. Adjournment NapLes Daily News NapLes/ FL 34102 Affidavit of PubLication . Naples Daily News : PORT OF THE ISLANDS 10300 NW 11TH MANOR CORAL SPRINGS FL 33071 REFERENCE: 010948 58519294 NOTICE OF flEETING OF State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared AngeLa Bryant/ who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Secretary of the Naples Daily News/ a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County/ FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising vas published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily Ne~s is a newspaper published at Naples, Jn said Collier County/ FLorida/ and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously pubLishe~l in said Collier County/ FLorida/ each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples/ in said Collier County, Florida, for a peric~J of I year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 09/13 AD SPACE: 144.000 INCH FILED ON: 09/1~/02 PersonaLLy known by me My Camm Exp. 12J10/04 No. CC 983546 [ I Person~ly Known [ ] Othe~ I.D. NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE PORT OF THE ISLANDS C~)MMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT A ragu ar meeting of the Board of ~he Supervisors of the Port of the Island Community ImproYe- ment Dlstrlct .Is sched- uled to be held on Friday, September 20, 2002, 1000 a.m., at the Egret Room, 25000 Tamlamll Trail East, Naples, Florl-J dc~ The meeting Is open to the publk: and will be condi~ted In 'accordance with the provisions of Florida law for Commu- nit? Development DIs- fi.lcts. A copy of the Agenda for this meeting may be obtained fi.om Darrln Mossing 1030( NW 11th Manor,. cora Springs, Florlda 33071 (954) 753-0380. Pursuant to SeCtion 286.011(8), FlOrida Stautes a p6rtion of this meeting will cOncern matters related to 'aend- Drstrld Is presently' a party. The. discussions concernlng the pending litigation will be con- ductod in a closed ses- sion, The Chairman shall announce the com- mencement and the esti- mated length of the attorney/clleat Session and the names of the persons attending. , The. I persons who may (menuI the meeting are the Board of 'Supervlsors;I Danln Mossing, DlstrlcfJ Manager;, and Daniel H.I co~ ..Esej:, Dial.ct httard ney. AT me cancluslon aT; the closed session, the L meeting shall be ree~en-I ed andre person ~alr-I ng the meeting ~all an- nounce the termlnaton of the closed sessto~. The entire closed Session shall be recorded by a cerrdled' court reporter. The court reparte[ shall re~ord the times of com. mencement and terma, tan of, the sesslPn, all discussion anand pro- ceedlngs, fha names of ail ~s ~esent at ar~ ~me and the names of ail persons speakln~ No portion of the session shaft be off the record, The court reporters notes shall be fully fi.an- . Sarlbed and filed .with the : Dlstrlcl's Clerk within .a reasonable time after the meetlgg. HoweVer, 'the transcript will n~ be public record until con- cluslan of the litigation. The sublect matter of the meeting shall be con- fined to settlement neao- flaflons or Strategy ses- slons related to litigation expenditures. As re. qulred by SeCtion 286.011(8), Florl,d,a Stat- utes, the Districts affor- ne? advised the Board of Supervisors at a public meeting on August 16, 2002, that he had con- cerns In regards to the l litigation and .the Board of Supervisors set thls meeting, ' 161 1 There may be occasions[ ._ when one or more S~lper- visors will partlclPat!~.- bY1 - telephone. At ~e aoovel location there will beJ present a spewer tale-/ phone so th~ any Inter-/ ested person can oftendJ the meeting ~ the abovel location and be f~lN In-/ formed of the dlScus-/ signs faking place e.lther/ In person or by telepn_gn, e/ communication, TinS/ meeting may be contln-/ ued to a dote and time/ cer'mln to be announcedl at the meefln~ Each person who. decid- es to appeal any n~ by the Board, w~_m~_ rospecf to any ~ consldered ~t the meet- lng Is advised that .per: son will need a recara m the proceedings, and acCOrdingly, the ~ may need to ens.ore. ~m~_ a verbatim recora m me ~roceedlngs Is made, CIudlng the tesflmon~ and evldence u~oa whlct such appeal IS to be MGory I. Mover anager 101549 ~eat. ]3 No. 2 NapLes Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News -- -- PORT OF TltE ISLANDS 10300 NW 11TH MANOR CORAL SPRZNGS FL 33071 REFERENCE: (710948 58519193 Notice to Bidders Po State of FLorida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared Angela Bryant, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples/ in said Collier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, FLorida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a peric~ of I year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person/ firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 09/12 AD SPACE: 27.000 INCH FILED ON: 09/12/02 Signature of Affiant ~/~ ~ ~"~~o:-~: :-ii-:: ....... Sworn to and Subscribed before me this_L~_day I Persia[ky kno. n by me Notice to Bidders Port of th® Island Community Improvement DIsITIct Sealed bids for fha pur- chase of certain Item de- clared as surplus will be 'received no Icier than 11:00 AAA October 7th, 2002 af 12600 Unlon Road, Naples, Florida 34114. The Item declared as 5ur~lus Is: 1994 Ford Ranger 148,0000 miles. Interested parties may obtain a detailed Invento- ry fist and view the sur- plus Item .during normal working hours ~t the above referenced ad- dress. Tim Stephens Fleld AAanager. 941-642-9219 Sept, 12 No, 2102492 Prepared by: Port of the Islands COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ANNUAL ENGINEERING REPORT JULY 2002 Ro~ald E. Benson, Jr. Ph.D., P.E. r~ P.E. 39926 ~ Dat, HOLE MONTES, INC 950 Encore Way Naples, Florida 3411(] Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 1772 161 1 FY' 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1-I SECTION 2 2.1 2.2 AUTHORITY, PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION Authority and Purpose ............................................................................. 2-1 Organization ............................................................................................. 2-2 SECTION 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 EXISTING FACILITIES Sewage Collection System ....................................................................... 3-1 Water Distribution System ....................................................................... 3-1 Fire/Irrigation Distribution System .......................................................... 3-2 Drainage System ...................................................................................... 3-3 Roads ........................................................................................................ 3-3 Fire/Irrigation Pump Station .................................................................... 3-4 Water Treatment Facilities ....................................................................... 3-4 Wastewater Treatment Facilities .............................................................. 3-5 Table 3-1 Effluent Value Comparison ..................................................... 3-8 SECTION 4 4.1 FINANCIAL REVIEW OF BOND IMPROVEMENTS Financial Review of Capital Projects Funded by Special Assessment Bonds, Series 1990 .................................................. 4-1 SECTION 5 EXHIBITS SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................... 5-1 Table 5-1 Replacement Cost & Life Expectancy for Equipment ...... 5-11; 13 Exhibit A - POI Sewer System Exhibit B - POI Potable Water System Exhibit C - POI Irrigation Water System FY2001 - Figures Road Resurfacing Phasing Plan Pavement Condition Report of April 18, 2001 Section 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents to the Bondholders, and to the Port of the Island Community Improvement District (District), an assessment of the condition of the water and wastewater systems, the drainage system, roads, and other miscellaneous improvements. This report covers those facilities completed and a summary of those facilities to be constructed. The Port of the Islands community is separated into four quadrants divided east-west by US 41 and north-south by the Faka Union Canal. The Northwest quadrant did not have any development planned that was part of the Special Assessment Bonds, Series, 1990. This quadrant contains the District's irrigation and fire protection pumping facilities. The Northeast quadrant contains the District's water and wastewater treatment facilities. The remaining portion of the Northeast quadrant consists of the RV site and one of the two hotels on the site. This hotel is closed. The Southwest and Southeast quadrants contain the bulk of the residential development with a mix of patio homes, single-family and multi-family homes. The Southwest quadrant also contains the second of two hotels and the marina. This hotel reopened during FY2000. W:\ 1990\ 1990154~amnlRpts~200 I~FY01 DRAFT.doc 1-1 161 Section 2 AUTHORITY, PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION 2.1 AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE The Port of the Islands Community Improvement District (District) entered into a Professional Services Agreement on February 28, 1991 with Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. (HM&A) that appointed HM&A as the District Engineer of Record for the Port of the Islands Community Improvement District. This report is prepared to meet the reporting requirements contained in the Special Assessment Bonds, Series, 1990. The Annual Report provides to the bondholders the Engineer's Opinion of the District Facilities in the following areas: · The financial status of the improvements to be done under the Bond. · Observation and assessment of the conditions of the District Facilities. · Determination of whether the District has maintained the District Facilities in good condition and operated them in an efficient manner at a reasonable cost. · Follow-up of recommendations from the previous report. · Advice and recommendations as deemed appropriate. W:\ 1990\ 1990154La. NNLRPTS~200 I\FY01 DRAFT. DOC 2-1 2.2 ORGANIZATION This Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2001 is presented as follows: Section 3 - Existing Facilities presents a brief discussion of the major components and operation of the existing facilities. Section 4 - Financial Review of Bond Improvements presents the status of the improvements listed under the Special Assessment Bonds, Series, 1990. Section 5 - Summary and Recommendations presents the follow-up of recommendations from the previous report and a summary of findings and recommendations. W:\ 1990\1990154LMqNLRPTSX2001 \FY01 DRAFT.DOC 2-2 161 1 Section 3 EXISTING FACILITIES 3.1 Sewage Collection System The sewage transmission system owned and maintained by the District appears to be well maintained. The sewage transmission system, as show in Exhibit A, consists of five pump stations (one in the Northeast quadrant and two each in the Southeast and Southwest quadrant), and a pressure force main connecting the pump stations to the wastewater treatment plant. A review of the pump station flows and pressures indicates that there are no constrictions in the force mains and that the force main system is operating as designed. During 2001, one pump was rebuilt from the pump station in the Northeast quadrant. The District owns and maintains the gravity sewer collection system in the southwest and southeast quadrants, with the exception of the gravity system within the south hotel and marina property. The District does not own or maintain any gravity sewer collection system on the northeast quadrant as of this report. The gravity sewer collection system owned by the District has been inspected in the last several years to determine the amount of infiltration and inflow that exists within the confines of this system. Repairs have been made to the sanitary sewer system as they have been identified that have reduced infiltration into the system. The operators continue to monitor and test the system in an effort to further reduce infiltration into the system. 3.2 Water Distribution System The water distribution system that provides potable water to the residents is owned and maintained by the District, and it appears to be well maintained. This system is depicted in Exhibit B. The backbone of the water distribution system is complete with the only remaining systems to be constructed by the developers of the various undeveloped parcels. There were no W:\! 990\1990154LANNLRPTS~200 I~Y01 DRAFT.DOC 3-1 items of concern noted during a recent inspection of the facilities. The wellfield consists of two wells approximately 1½ miles from the plant. During FY2000, the well pumps and motors were replaced. To ensure continual performance, it is recommended that the wells be examined and evaluated to determine their structural integrity and hydrogeological condition. 3.3 Fire/Irrigation Distribution System The fire irrigation system is illustrated in Exhibit C. In 2001, the South hotel owners extended the fire/irrigation system to service the South hotel (Port of the Islands, Phase One plat area). During 2002, the fire/irrigation distribution in the northeast quadrant was constructed. During recent drought periods, the water in the canal that provides the water for the fire/irrigation system has experienced higher than normal chloride levels. To alleviate this problem, plans were completed to connect the newly extended the fire/irrigation main to the wastewater treatment plant and supplying a combination of reclaimed water and raw water into the fire/irrigation main. Permit application for a reclaimed water system was submitted to FDEP for approval. The District has obtained a commitment for matching funds from South Florida Water Management District (up to $75,000) to construct this proposed project estimated to cost approximately $185,000. A review of the fire/irrigation distribution system owned and operated by the District shows no signs of leakage and appears to be well maintained. During the recently completed fire/irrigation distribution system extension, a minor leak at the plug in fire/irrigation main located at the North Entrance Road was corrected. Fire flow testing conducted during FY2001 demonstrated that the system has sufficient capacity to meet Collier County's requirements for multi-story buildings. The SFWMD Individual Use Class Water Use Permit No. 11-00372-W expired December 15, 1995, but was extended to December 15, 1997 by the South Florida Water Management District because rule making was not complete concerning the Lower West Coast Supply Plan. On W:\1990\1990154XANNLRPTSX200 IXFY01 DRAFT.DOC 3-2 October 9, 1997, the Governing Board of the SFWMD again extended the expiration date of the permit from December 15, 1997 to December 15,2001. Port of the Islands was notified that the South Florida Water Management District will notify them when the rules adopted to implement the Plan have been completed and expiration dates for permits have been established. At that time, a renewal application must be submitted within 30 days of the effective date of the rules adoption. During FY2001, no notification was received by operating staff. 3.4 Drainage System The drainage system at the Port of the Islands has been maintained by the District in an adequate manner. During FY2001, the drainage system did not have any washout areas. In FY98, three repair needs were identified. Only one of the three repairs to the drainage system was completed. The remaining repairs are tentatively scheduled for FY2002. 3.5 Roads The conditions of the roads within the Port of the Islands, which are maintained by the District, range from fair to poor based on FDOT's visual classification criteria. This was reported by Hole Montes, Inc from their site observations on April 12, 2001. The streets in the Southeast quadrant are in fair condition and will need re-strengthening (1" overlay of S-III asphaltic concrete) in about three to five years. These streets include: Cays Drive, Stella Maris South, Sunset Cay, Venus Cay, Windward Cay and Wilderness Cay. The streets in the Southwest quadrant are in poor condition. These streets include: Newport Drive, Newport Cay, Morningstar Cay, Eveningstar Cay and Sunrise Cay. These streets shall be scheduled for an overlay of one inch minimum of S-III asphaltic concrete. The Northwest quadrant that contains the North Road was observed to be in fair condition and will require re-strengthening in about three to five years. In recent years, paving cost including labor and material costs has doubled. The budget for roadway maintenance was increased to meet this higher cost. Since Newport Cay, Morningstar Cay, Eveningstar Cay and Sunrise Cay will not have additional utility crossings, it is recommended that overlaying of these streets be completed first. The overlaying of Newport Drive should be completed when the planned crossing for utility connections have all been completed. After the overlay is completed, it is recommended that any future crossing be W:\1990\1990154L~NNLRPTS~2001 \FY01 DRAFT.DOC 3-3 completed only with trenchless excavation techniques. The District has established an annual maintenance program of annually adding lime rock and grading the lime rock road leading to the treatment plant. 3.6 Fire/Irrigation Pump Station The fire/irrigation pump station with emergency generator power is located in the northwest quadrant. The station is approximately eleven years old. A review of the facilities and records indicate that the system requires some maintenance and repair, or replacement of some valves and equipment. The automatic self-cleaning strainer at the pumps requires annual repair and/or maintenance. Some equipment at the pump station is rusting and requires cleaning and painting. During the recent drought, the system was experiencing higher than normal chloride levels. During this period, the operations staff indicated that these levels reached as high as 5,000 mg/l. Following summer rains, the chloride concentration returned to normal levels. During FY2000, the equipment at the pump station was painted. The replacement air compressor was purchased and is scheduled for installation during FY2002. A temporary hose on discharge valve is leaking; this hose should be replaced with piping. 3.7 Water Treatment Facilities The water treatment plant (WTP) was completed in early 1994 and has been in operation since that time. The WTP consists of a degasifier to remove hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide gases, a softening reactor unit (solids contact unit) where lime is added to remove hardness, a sand filter to remove turbidity, chlorine is added for disinfection, and a 150,000 gallon finished water storage tank. The WTP has an FDEP permitted capacity to treat 432,000 gallons per day. The South Florida Water Management District's Water Use Permit No. 11-00271-W allows for the maximum daily allocation not to exceed 450,000 gallons. This permit expires on March 9, 2005. During FY2000, the monthly average flow produced by the water plant ranged from 58,000 gpd W:\1990\1990154L4aNNLRPTSX200 I\FY01 DRAFT.DOC 3-4 161 to 101,357 gpd. This range is higher than previous years because the South hotel was reopened during FY2000 and recent new construction of single and multi-family homes resulting in additional water demands on the system in comparison to FY99 and FY00. Historically, the water demands have been significantly lower than the water plant capacity. Because of this lower demand, the WTP was operated each day to only produce the amount of water needed for current demands. The finished water that is stored in the finished water storage tank supplies the pumps that feed the potable water system as needed. During FY2001, the maximum daily water usage ranged from 99,000 to 163,000 gpd with two maximum days exceeding 150,000-gallon storage capacity. The maximum daily usages were due to both the recent drought conditions that resulted in lowering the quality (high chloride levels) of the irrigation water that increased the use of potable water. The facility is manned a minimum of five days per week, six hours per day. During FY2001, the operations staff reported that raw water hardness levels ranged from 250 to 350 mg/l, and the finished water hardness levels ranged from 90 to 110 mg/l. The plant is meeting its operational objective for removal of hardness. The recorded lowest residual disinfectant entering the system ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 mg/1 of free chlorine. The lowest residual disinfectant concentration reported during FY2001 at the remote point in system ranged from 0.3 to 1.01 mg/1 of free chlorine. These reported values exceed FDEP's minimum chlorine residual requirement of 0.2 mg/1. Consideration should be given to implementing a water line flushing program in order to maintain residual chlorine throughout the system. During FY2001, the second new solenoid valve for the solid contact units was installed. Additionally, a new check valve on one of the high service pump, a new chlorine residual analyzer and a filter valve were installed during FY2001. 3.8 Wastewater Treatment Facilities In November 1993, the construction of the new wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) was substantially completed and began operation. The WWTP was designed to meet the stringent Advanced Wastewater Treatment (AWT) effluent limits imposed by the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for disposal to the on-site wetland. The W:\1990\i 990154~,NNLRPTSX200 I\FY0 ! DRAFT DOC 3-5 effluent must meet AWT standards of 5 mg/l 5-day carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBODs), 5 mg/l total suspended solids (TSS), 3 mg/l total nitrogen, and 1 rog/1 total phosphorus. Following treatment, the effluent is disposed to the existing 36-acre, on-site natural wetland through overland flow across an approximately 5-acre, man-made wetland. There is no discharge of water from the wetland into surface waters as the water is absorbed by the vegetation or evapotranspirated from the vegetation, evaporated from the ground, or seeps into the ground. The facility is manned a minimum of six hours per day - five days per week with a weekend observation to ensure proper operation. During periods when the operator is not present, the treated effluent is stored until the operator rems. If the continuous monitoring charts indicate proper operation while the operator was off duty, the stored water is then released to the wetland for disposal. On March 18, 1998, Port of Island Community Improvement District was issued permit number FL0141704-DW2P by the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to operate a 200,000 gallons per day (gpd) maximum monthly average daily flow Bardenpho process domestic advanced wastewater treatment facility. This permit expires on March 17, 2003. The application for renewal must be completed and submitted to FDEP 6 months prior to the expiration, or by September 17, 2002. The maximum 3-month average daily flow was 51,000 gpd during FY2001, or 25.5 percent of the permitted capacity, which is slightly greater than FY00. During FY2000, the South hotel was reopened while the North hotel remains closed. When it is required to meet future build out flow projections, the capacity can be increased to 300,000 gpd with minor modifications. The monthly operating reports for FY2001 indicated that the POI AWT produces effluent within effluent limits. During 2001, operation staff eliminated the use of sugar addition to provide a carbon source for nitrification. During low flow periods in FY2001, the operation staff utilized on and off aeration (8 hours on W:\1990\1990154~M'qNLRPTS~2001 ~FY01 DRAFT.DOC 3-6 and 8 hours off) to meet nitrogen effluent requirements. This procedure maintains the required carbon source of the wastewater for nitrification. A new recycle pump and a blower were rebuilt during FY2001. During FY2001, the annual average phosphorus level in the effluent was 0.41 mg/l, which was within the permit limits. The effluent phosphorus values for the maximum monthly average and maximum single sample were also below permit limits. During FY2001, the values for the average monthly effluent CBOD5 have consistently been within the permit limits of 5 mg/l and ranged from 1.0 mg/l to 2.0 mg/l. The values for the average monthly effluent total suspended solids have been within the permit limits of 5 mg/l, with bi-monthly values ranging from 1.0 mg/1 to 1.5 mg/l. During FY2001, the effluent from the POI AWT was below all permit limits for nitrogen. The total nitrogen level in the effluent for the annual average was 0.98 mg/1, the maximum average monthly was 1.5 mg/1 and the maximum single sample was 2.2 mg/1, which were within the permit limits. Table 3-1 compares POI WWTP's effluent values for FY2001 to the permit limits. The effluent values for CBOD5 TSS, Total Nitrogen (N) and Total Phosphorus (P) are within permit limits. W51990\1990154~dNNLRPTS~2001 \FY01 DRAFT.DOC 3-7 Table 3-1 Comparison of Effluent Values for FY2001 to Permit Limits 161 1 FY2001 Permit FY2001 Permit FY2001 Permit Annual Limit Maximum Limit Maximum Limit Average Annual Average Maximum Single Maximum Average Monthly Average Sample Single Parameter Monthly Sample CBOD5 (mg/1) 1.21 5.0 1.50 6.25 2.00 10.0 TSS (mg/1) 1.38 5.0 2.10 6.25 3.30 10.0 Total N (mg/l) 0.98 3.0 1.50 3.75 2.20 6.0 Total P (mg/l) 0.41 1.0 0.53 1.25 0.75 2.0 W:\ 1990\ 1990154LANNLRPTSX200 ILFY01 DRAFT.DOC 3-8 161 1 Section 4 FINANCIAL REVIEW OF BOND IMPROVEMENTS 4.1 Financial Review of Capital Projects Funded by the Special Assessment Bonds, Series 1990 All projects identified in the Updated Project Description prepared by Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. (December 1992) were constructed except the Fire/Irrigation Main to the NE Quadrant. As of January 2001, the balance sheet for the Port of the Island CID reported having $68,973 in the Capital Project Fund. Utilizing these funds from the Capital Project Fund along with funds in the operating budget plus funds in the General Reserve fund appears to be sufficient to complete this project during 2002. (The fire/irrigation main was completed in July 2002.) Once the permit is approved for the reclaimed water system, additional funds will be required to complete the reclaimed water facilities. The grant for $75,000 from the South Florida Water Management District will be used for the reclaimed water project. W:\1990\1990154La3qNLRPTS~200 I~FY01 DRAFT.DOC 4-1 1 Section $ SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The facilities owned and maintained by the Port of the Island Community Improvement District generally appear to be well maintained. The existing facilities have been maintained in such a manner as not to reduce the life expectancy of any of the facilities reviewed. The District Staff appears to be well managed and administered by qualified and capable personnel. The staff responsible for maintaining the work is knowledgeable of the system and appears to be capable of effectively maintaining the various facilities. STATUS OF RECOMMENDATIONS FROM PREVIOUS REPORT Roads and Drainage 1. The conditions of the roads withln the Port of the Islands, which are maintained by the District, range from fair to poor based FDOT's visual classification criteria. This was reported by Hole Montes, Inc from their site observations on April 12, 2001. There are approximately 20,000 linear feet of roads at Port of the Islands. Cost for milling and resurfacing of these roads is expected to be between $9.00 and $12.00 per linear foot for 18-foot wide residential streets. Other factors that affect the overlay costs are actual pavement conditions and petroleum costs at the time of overlay. For an average of ten years between resurfacing, an annual cost of between $18,000 and $24,000 is estimated to maintain these roads, although more than that may be needed to catch up on activity that continues to be postponed. The streets in the Southeast quadrant are in fair condition and will need re-strengthening (1" overlay of S-III asphaltic concrete) in about three to five years. These streets include: Cays Drive, Stella Marls South, Sunset Cay, Venus Cay, Windward Cay and Wilderness Cay. The streets in the Southwest quadrant in poor condition are Newport Drive, Newport Cay, Momingstar Cay, Eveningstar Cay and Sunrise Cay. These streets should be scheduled for an overlay of a minimum of one-inch of S-III asphaltic concrete. The Northwest quadrant, which contains the North Road, was observed to be in fair W:\1990\ 1990154LadNNLRPTSX200 I~FY01 DRAFT.DOC 5-1 1 condition and will require re-strengthening in about three to five years. Since paving costs which include labor and material costs have doubled in recent years, the current budget for roadway maintenance has been increased to meet this higher cost. Since the following streets will not have additional utility crossings, it is recommended that overlaying of these streets be completed first. These streets include: Newport Cay, Momingstar Cay, Eveningstar Cay, and Sunrise Cay. The overlaying of Newport Drive should be completed when all the planned crossing for utility connections have been completed. After the overlay is completed, it is recommended that any future crossing only be completed with trenchless excavation techniques. Status: This recommendation is under consideration. Fire/Irrigation Distribution System 1. Continue to remove vegetation around pad at pump station and grade to facilitate drainage. Status: This work continues. 2. Since the water supply (Faka Canal) for fire/irrigation distribution has seasonal high chloride levels that are detrimental to some of the landscaping, continue planning to connect the fire/irrigation distribution system to the new reclaimed water system. Status: The underground portion of this project has been completed The permit for the reclaimed water system has been submitted and once the approval is obtained, the cost for reclaimed water system can be finalized 3. Replace the pressure sustaining valve and automatic strain unit. Status: This is being considered Sewage Collection System 1. Continue to monitor for infiltration into gravity sewer collection Status: This work continues. Annually inspect all pump stations including pumps, controls and alarms. Status: This work continues. system. W:\1990\1990154XANNLRPTS~200 IWY01 DRAFT.DOC 5-2 Water Treatment Plant 1. Continue operation of the softening unit to ensure continuous supply of soft water. Status: This work continues 2. The launders and the inside surface of the solids contact unit are rusting and require sand blasting and painting. The launders near the aerator stilling well and the stilling well need to be repaired or replaced. The inside surface of the sand filter requires painting. NSF-approved paint shall be used. Status: The launders have been temporarily repaired and painted Due to the condition of the existing metal type launders, consideration should be given to replacing the launders with ones constructed from fiberglass. Cost should be determined and funds set aside. 3. To ensure the continual performance of the raw water wells, the wells should be examined and evaluated to determine their structural integrity and hydrogeological condition. Status: The scope of study and cost should be determined 4. Install the second solenoid valve on the solids contact unit used to waste calcium carbonate sludge. Status: This work was completed. 5. Consideration should be given to replacement of the transfer pumps (bearings are making noise). It has been in operation for the past eight years. This equipment was purchased in a "used condition" and is approaching the end of its normal service life. Status: This work is being considered. 6. To supplement the new reclaimed water system, provide water from the raw water line to the effluent storage tank. Status: The underground portion of this work was completed No connections were made at this time. Awaiting permit approval. 7. o Consideration should be given to replace the 4 backwash valves for the sand filter. Status: This work was completed. Consideration should be given to sealing the minor cracks in the glass liner in the W:\1990\1990154~kNNLRPTS~200 lkFY01 DRAFT.DOC 5-3 finished water storage tank. 161 1 Status: Inspection of the tank is being considered during FY2002. Water usage should be monitored along with monitoring the building in the district and the status of the closed North hotel. Planning should begin to ensure that there is an adequate supply of stored water available for pumping during the periods when the facility is unmanned. Status: Planning for this item is under consideration. Wastewater Treatment Plant 1. Continue to collect effluent samples at a minimum of once every two weeks and have the outside laboratory analyze the samples for CBODs, TSS, fecal coliform, nitrogen and phosphorus as required by the operating permit. Status: This work continues. 2. The package plant from the old south WWTP was placed on the new plant site following abandonment and sale of the old plant and plant site. The package plant should be rehabilitated (sandblasted/painted/repaired) to provide a system for sludge stabilization and thickening. This will result in a reduction in contract hauling costs that have increased by approximately 50% during FY2000. Status: This work is being considered. 3. The District obtained a used sand filter unit that is stored at the plant site. It is anticipated that this unit can be used during Phase II expansion. The unit should be examined annually and the structural steel components should be maintained by painting to prevent rusting. Consideration should be given to installing this unit during the proposed reclaimed water project. This unit would provide backup to the existing sand filter. Status: This work is being considered 4. Continue to monitor dissolved oxygen level in the First Anoxic Basin, Nitrification Basins, Second Anoxic Basin, and Reaeration Basin using portable DO meter. If the DO levels need adjusting in the Nitrification or Reaeration Basins, adjust the air control valves accordingly. Status: The operation staff installed a submersible mixer in the first anoxic basin W:\1990\ 1990154L4.NNLRPTS~200 ILFY01 DRAFT.DOC 5-4 and converted end portion of the nitrification to anoxic tank and changed the continuous aeration system to an &hours on and 8-hours off operation. Additionally, augmentation of the carbon source in the influent with sugar water was stopped. Effluent from the WWTP continues to be below effluent limits. 5. Continue sampling of effluent from the chlorine contact basin and perform field tests for ammonia and nitrate. The ammonia level in the effluent should be less than 1 mg/1 and the sum of the nitrate and ammonia should be less than 3 mg/l in order to meet the required effluent limits. Also, test a sample from the chlorine contact basin for phosphorus using field test kit. The phosphorus in the effluent should be less than 1 mg/1 if the alum feed rate is adequate. Status: This work continues. 6. Develop an historical CBOD5 to COD ratio. This ratio can be used to control the nitrification process. Status: This is being considered. 7. Continue annual power cleaning program, when required. The roof on the building requires painting. Consider adding painting program. Status: The power cleaning continues. _Painting of the roof is being considered. g. The frames for the recycle pumps require cleaning and painting. Status: The North pump was removed and replaced with new pump. Some additional electrical work needs to be completed. South pump needs to be replaced. 9. Stucco is cracking on the aeration basin and filters. Continue to monitor the cracks and condition of the stucco. Status: This work continues. 10. Continue to monitor the cracks in concrete walls of the filters and aeration basins. Status: This work continues. 11. Vegetation around the effluent discharge pipe at the wetland shall be maintained and cleared as often as necessary to maintain proper operation of the overland flow system. The distribution pipe shall be cleared of all roots. If required, adjust distribution orifice to ensure uniform distribution of effluent into the wetlands. Status: This work is being considered. 12. Continue the planning process to modify the effluent disposal system by adding a reclaimed water system. This also includes submitting an application to FDEP for modification to current WWTP permit. Utilize the effluent storage tank to store W:\! 990\1990154La3qNLRPTS~200 I~Y01 DRAFT.DOC 5-5 13. reclaimed and supplement the demand for reclaimed water with raw water from raw water wells. Provide reclaimed water pumps to meet the irrigation demands. Extend the fire/irrigation line to the WWTP site and connect to the reclaimed water pumps. The existing effluent disposal system will be maintained as an alternative disposal system. Status: The permit application for a reuse system was submitted and the additional information requested by FDEP was submitted Awaiting permit approval. The underground piping has been installed Connections or modification to the WWT_P will not be started until permit is issued. Consider the acquisition of used steel water tank for future use as an effluent storage tank. This will increase storage capacity of treated effluent for use as irrigation water. Status: This work is being considered. All Utilities under the District Established a budget item in the furore for Repair and Replacement of Major Equipment at $100,000 per year with any unused amounts in a given year retained in the account for future years when expenditures may exceed the average. See Table 5- 1 - Replacement Cost and Life Expectancy for Equipment. Status: This was established at $95, O00 per year in the budget for the past year. Due to problems with collection of standby fees from some larger properties, the funding of the account has not actually occurred RECOMMENDATIONS Roads and Drainage The conditions of the roads within the Port of the Islands, which are maintained by the District, range from fair to poor based FDOT's visual classification criteria. To provide the best finished product, it is recommended that the roadway overlay project be completed in four phases at an estimated total cost for the four-phase project of $288,300. W:\1990\1990154XANNLRPTS~200 IXFY01 DRAFT, DOC 5-6 161 1 The limits of each phase and estimated cost for each phase are as follows: The first phase would include the southern portion of the roads in the Southwest portion of the community including Newport Cay, Morning Star Cay, Evening Cay, Sunrise Cay (these roads are in poor condition) and the portion of Newport Drive South off Sunrise Cay. The estimated cost for this phase is $76,800. The second phase would include the southern portion of the roads in the Southeast portion of the community including Sunset Cay, Venus Cay, Windward Cay, Wildness Cay and the portion of Cays Drive South of Stella Maris. The estimated cost for this phase is $72,000. · The third phase would include Stella Maris and the remaining portion of Newport Drive and Cay Drive. The estimated cost for this phase is $55,500. · The fourth phase would overlay the North Road. The estimated cost for this phase is $84,000. After each overlay phase is completed, it is recommended that any future crossing for utilities only be completed with trenchless excavation techniques. Fire/Irrigation Distribution System 1. Continue to remove vegetation around pad at pump station and grade to facilitate drainage. 2. Since the water supply (Faka Canal) for fire/irrigation distribution has seasonal high chloride levels that are detrimental to some of the landscaping, continue plan to connect the fire/irrigation distribution system to the new reclaimed water system. 3. Replace the pressure sustaining valve and automatic strainer unit. Replace the temporary hose at the valve with piping. Sewage Collection System 1. Continue to monitor for infiltration into gravity sewer collection system. 2. Annually inspect all pump stations including pumps, controls and alarms. Water Treatment Plant 1. Continue operation of the softening unit to ensure continuous supply of soft water. 2. Since the condition of the metal launders walkway continues to deteriorate, consideration should be given to replacing the metal launders and walkway with fiberglass launders and W:\1990\1990154VLN'NLRPTS~2001~FY01 DRAFT.DOC 5-7 161 3. To ensure the continual performance of the raw water wells, the wells should be examined and evaluated to determine their structural integrity and hydrogeological condition. Scope of study and cost should be determined. 4. Consideration should be given to replacement of the transfer pumps (bearings are making noise). This equipment was purchased in a "used condition", has been in operation for the past eight years, and is approaching the end of its normal service life. 5. After the reclaimed water permit is issued by FDEP, complete the work to supplement the proposed new reclaimed water system by completing the raw water line connections. 6. Consideration should be given to having the finished water storage tank inspected by manufacturer. All repair work should be completed to ensure the continuous operation of the tank. The repairs should include sealing the minor cracks in the glass liner in the finished water storage tank. 7. Water usage should be monitored along with monitoring the building in the district and the status of the closed North hotel. Planning should begin to ensure that there is an adequate supply of stored water available for pumping during the periods when the facility is unmanned. 8. To improve security at the water treatment plant, consideration should be given to replacing the deteriorated doors (3 single doors and 2 double doors) on building at the water treatment plant with fiberglass doors. Wastewater Treatment Plant 1. Continue to collect effluent samples at a minimum of once every two weeks and have the outside laboratory analyze the samples for CBODs, TSS, fecal coliform, nitrogen and phosphorus as required by the operating permit. 2. The package plant from the old south WWTP was placed on the new plant site following abandonment of the old plant and sale of the old plant site. The package plant should be rehabilitated (sandblasted/painted/repaired) to provide a system for sludge stabilization and thickening. This will result in a reduction in contract hauling costs. 3. The District obtained a used sand filter unit that is stored at the plant site. It is anticipated that this unit can be used during Phase II expansion. The unit should be examined annually W:\1990\ 1990154L4NNLRPTSX2001 \FY01 DRAFT.DOC 5-8 and the structural steel components should be maintained by painting to prevent rusting. Consideration should be given to installing this unit during the proposed reclaimed water project. This unit would provide backup to the existing sand filter. 4. Continue to monitor dissolved oxygen level in the First Anoxic Basin, Nitrification Basins, Second Anoxic Basin, and Reaeration Basin using portable DO meter. If the DO levels need adjusting in the Nitrification or Reaeration Basins, adjust the air control valves accordingly. 5. Continue sampling of effluent from the chlorine contact basin and perform field tests for ammonia and nitrate. The ammonia level in the effluent should be less than 1 mg/l and the sum of the nitrate and ammonia should be less than 3 mg/1 in order to meet the required effluent limits. Also, test a sample from the chlorine contact basin for phosphorus using field test kit. The phosphorus in the effluent should be less than 1 mg/1 if the alum feed rate is adequate. 6. Develop an historical CBOD5 to COD ratio. This ratio can be used to control the nitrification process. 7. Continue annual power cleaning program, when required. The roof on the building requires painting. Consider adding painting program. 8. Consideration should be given to replace the second recycle pump. 9. Stucco is cracking on the aeration basin and filters. Continue to monitor the cracks and condition of the stucco. 10. Continue to monitor the cracks in concrete walls for the filters and aeration basins. 11. Vegetation around the effluent discharge pipe at the wetland shall be maintained and cleared as often as necessary to maintain proper operation of the overland flow system. The distribution pipe shall be cleared of all roots. If required, adjust distribution orifice to ensure uniform distribution of effluent into the wetlands. Consideration should be given to contracting a specialist in killing and removing all vegetation around the distribution. Once all vegetation is removed, replace any distribution pipe that has been damage from vegetation growth. 12. After receiving the permit from FDEP, complete the reclaimed water system. 13. Consider the acquisition of used steel water tank for future use as an effluent storage tank. This will increase storage capacity of treated effluent for use as irrigation water. 14. Contact the filter manufacturer to inspect and service the filter. Recently, floatable solids were observed in the chlorine contact tank. W:\1990\1990154XANNLRPTS~200 I~FY01 DRAFT.DOC 5-9 All Utilities under the District 161 1 The District established a budget item for Repair and Replacement of Major Equipment at $95,000 per year with any unused amounts in a given year retained in the account for future years when the expenditures may exceed the average. See Table 5-1 - Replacement Cost and Life Expectancy for Equipment. As financial conditions improve with collection of unpaid fees, this account should eventually be funded. It is anticipated that those projects that are being postponed will be caught up at that time. W:\ 1990\ 1990154'¢dqNLRPTS'O.00 I\FY01 DRAFT.DOC 5-10 161 1 '5 0 0 ! O~ O0 O0 ~ 000 0000 O0 O00 ~ O0 00000000 0 O00 O0 000 O0 00 O000 O000 0000 O0 0 O0 O0 O0 O000 O000 00 O000 000 O0 oo ~~~ o o oo oo ooo oo 0 0 C C 0000000 ~000000 o o 161 1 EXHIBITS Z 000000000000 ~ 000000000~00 ~ ~ 000000000000 ~ ~000000~0 ~ ~ ~00~000000~0 ~ 000000~00000 ~ 000000000000 ~ ~ 88888°°°°°88 8 ..... ~:~. , 000:000000000 ~ !61 PORT OF THE ISLANDS AWWTP FY 2001 ' Average Flows 0.22 0.20 0,18 0.16 0.14 0.12 ~0.10 0.08 0.08 0,04 0.02 0.00 o Month/Year Permitted Maximum Annual Flow Monthly Avg Flow 3-Month ADF 3-Month ADF as % of Capacity O w <~ w <~ Z C3 -~ LL ~ Month/Year PORT OF THE ISLANDS AWWTP FY 2001 !61 CBODs'Effluent Monthly Average 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 Permitted Monthly Limit mg/I Permitted Annual Limit --IB---CBOD5 Effluent Monthly Average 1.0 0o5f Month/Year 12.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 E~6o0 5.0 4.0 :3.0 2.0 ~.o~ CBOD5 Effluent Permitted Maximum Month/Year FY01 .xls 7/15/2002 PORT OF THE ISLANDS AWWTP FY 2001 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2,5 2.0 1.5 1,0 0.5 0.0 o o TSS Effluent Monthly Average Permitted Monthly Limit 6.25 u. ~; <~ ~ '~ ~ Permitted Annual Limit Month/Year , TSS Monthly Average TSS Effluent 11.0 Permitted Maximum 10.5 10,0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4,5 4.0 3.5 3,0 Month/Year I n z 5- ~ r-- ~:) --~ ::3 13. PORT OF THE ISLANDS AWWTP FY 2001 1_6'! Total Nitrogen Effluent Monthly Average 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 Z ~3 ~ u. ~ ~: Month/Year Permitted Average Monthly Limit - 3.75 mg/I - Total Nitrogen Effluent Monthly Average Permitted Annual Average Limit Total Nitrogen Effluent 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6,5 6.0 5.5 ~,5.0 E 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2°5 ~ 2.0 1.5 I! 1.0 · 0.,5 t 0.0 0 Permitted Maximum Limit · · · · · · I · I -'3 03 Month/Year PORT OF THE ISLANDS AWWTP FY 2001 Total Phosphr0us Effluent Monthly Average 2.00 E 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 o o o O UJ .~ UJ 0 Z C3 ~ u_ ~ Month/Year Permi[ted Average Monthly Limit Permitted Average Annual Limit Total Phosphrous Effluent Monthly Average Total Phosphrous Effluent 6.0 5.5 I 5.0 4.5 4.0 $.5 2.5 Pormittod Maximum Limit 2.0 1.5 1.0 · . o.sm ! · · · I ! · m 0 0 0 - 0 Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W Month/Year l! r ~/I8/a001 4 HOLE, MONTES & ASSOC. -~ HMA MAIN EIaNEERS * PL,~N~S - ~J~%'YOR5 NO. 492 16[ 1 6202-F P~'e~lde~ial C~urt. Fort I~yef&, Fledde ~391 II. Pll®e: 941.61~5,12DO- Fax: G,~I .lta5.12.59 Apdl 18, 2001 Mr. Jerry Taricska Hole Montes, Inc. PO Box 111629 Naples, FL 34108 RE: Port of the Islands Development HM Project No.: 90.154Z VIA FAX & MAIL. Dear Mr. Taricska: On April 12, 2001, representatives from Hole Montes, Inc. conducted a limited visual observation of pavement conditions within the Port of the Islands Development in Collier County Florida. The purpose of our observations was to determine the general overall condition of the roadways with respect to planning for future rehabilitation. The visual clarification criteria used is from the FDOT Manual for New Construction and Pavement Rehabilitation. The criteria is as follows: GOOD - No cracking, minor rutting/distortion. FAIR- Some cracking, minor ruffing/diMortion, POOR, - Severe cracking, raveling of aggregate, ruUing ½ inch in depth or more. Three areas of the development were observed with the eastern development area being observed first. This area contains the following streets: Cays Drive, Stella Morris South, Sunset Cay, Venus Cay. Windward Cay and Wilderness Cay. Generally speaking these roadways were observed to be in fair condition with surface oxidation, some longitudinal cracking, cracking around man'F{~l-es ~nd some minor pavement distortion, It Is believed this area was overlaid about five (5) years ago. Based upon our observations, we anticipate these pavements will need m-strengthening in about three (3) more years. For re-strengthening, we recommend a minimum of one inch of S-Ill asphaltic concrete. Areas, at the time of overlay, demonstrating localized failure should be cutout and repaired before the overlay to minimize reflective cracking, As preventative maintenance, the cracks observed as well as others discovered should be cleaned and filled with pourable crack filler, such as Flex-Master crack sealer, manufactured by Sealmaster or similar product. The western development area was observed second, This area contains the following streets: Newport Drive, Newport Cay, Mornlngstar Cay, Eveningstar Cay and Sunrise Cay. Generally speaking these roadways were observed to be in poor condition with NaOlee, Fo~ Mlmra, Venire, E~lleWmd 10:01 HOLE, MONTES & ASSOC. · HMA MAIN Ur, Jerry Tel4c~k~ AI~tl 16. 200t Page 2 NO. 49~ ~2 advanced surface oxidation, edge failures, longitudinal cracking, some pothollng, unrepalred utility cuts and raveling aggregate, The pavement age Is not known, but appears to have reached Its useful fife. Deterioration will mostly likely acoelerate from this time forward. We would recommend this area be 13rogrammed for an overlay of a minimum of one Inch of 8-111 asphaltic concrete, Areas at the time of overly, demonstrating localized failure should be cutout and repaired. Any utility cuts should be repaired or leveled pdar 1o the overlay. North Road was observed last. The majority of this road was observed to be In fair condition, with some Isolated areas of distress near the north end. We re--mend this roadway be re-strengthened in about three (3) years wilh a minimum one-inch overlay of S-Ill asphaltic concrete. Preventive maintenanoe in the form of crack filling should be followed until the overlay is performed, The aforementioned Sealmaster product can be considered. Areas, at the time of overlay, demonstrating localized failure should be cutout and repaired before the overlay to minimize reflective cracking. Presently, we would estimate the cost of the recommended overlay to be around $5.00 per square yard, or $12.00 per lineal foot for an 18-foot wide residential street. Other factors that could effect the overlay .c~sts are actual pavement conditions al the time of overlay and petroleum costs when the overlay is bid. I trust this letter provides you with the information you requested. I am available should you require more Information in this matter, Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. DARRELL G, HARTLEY, P,I i. Contract Administrator/Associate DGH/dd c,c, File W:~200~.O-Oa ~eml~,Dgh~Jt0 lO41 Port of the Island Site Observations on the Roadways On April 12, 2001 (H M 1990154) 161 1 Cays Drive · Entrance lane near the first bend in the roadway has cracks. · In the entrance lane, the pavement dips around a manhole. · Cracks are in the entrance lane north of Stella Marls entrances. · Approximately 10 feet of road gutter on the East side of Cays Drive across from Stella Maris. · The roadway is turning a white color, which indicates that pavement is losing asphaltic bonding chemicals. Stella Maris · The roadway is turning a white color, which indicates that pavement is losing asphaltic bonding chemicals. Sunset Cay · The roadway is turning a white color, which indicates that pavement is losing asphaltic bonding chemicals. Venus Cay · There is a dip around the valve box at the entrance to Venus Cay. · The roadway is turning a white color, which indicates that pavement is losing asphaltic bonding chemicals. Windward Cay · South side of Windward Cay has cracks near the midpoint of Windward Cay. · There are cracks around the valve box that is on the South side of the entrance into Windward Cay. · The roadway is turning a white color, which indicates that pavement is losing asphaltic bonding chemicals. Wildness Cay · The cracks around the three manholes near the entrance of Wildness Cay were patched but cracks have reappeared. · The roadway is turning a white color, which indicates that pavement is losing asphaltic bonding chemicals. Newport Drive The entrance lane was cut and patched but the patch is higher than the road. · The entrance lane has a pothole developing and cracks in the pavement. · Another location on the entrance lane has a dip. · At North end of Newport Drive both the entrance and exist lanes have been cut and patch. · At another location on the North end of Newport Drive, both the entrance and exist lanes have been cut but not patch. · The westerly edge of the entrance lane near Sunrise is missing base and is cracking. · The southern half of Newport Drive the stones are coming out of the pavement. Momingstar Cay · Stones are coming out of the pavement. Eveningstar Cay · The pavement has edge cracking. · The drainpipe north of Eveningstar Cay on the east side of Newport Drive requires a new concrete collar. · The stones are coming out of the pavement in the circle areas. Sunrise Cay · The pavement has edge cracking. North Road · The roadway is turning a white color, which indicates that pavement is losing asphaltic bonding chemicals. · The pavement has some edge cracking · The roadway near the North hotel has been patched. These patched area are reoccurring repaired areas. PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT GENERAL-PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT HO(3H, FRtiY & ZUGMAN, GPA's PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 Independent Auditors' Report General-Purpose Financial Statements: Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - All Governmental Fund Types Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual - General and Debt Service Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Eamings- Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund Statement of Cash Flows - Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund Notes to Financial Statements Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Independent Auditors' Management Letter Auditee's Response to Management Letter Comments Supplementary Data: Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund: Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures - Budget and Actual (Budget Accounting Basis) Debt Service Fund and Capital Projects Fund: Schedule of Cash Receipts and Disbursements - Restricted Accounts 2-3 4 7 8 9 -21 22 - 23 24 - 27 28 29 30 Hoci~, FR:EY 8e ZUOIW~kN, CPA's CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS A PARTNERSHIP OF pROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS DAVID B. ZlJOl, iAN, CPA, P.A. DAVID B. BL~CK, CPA, P.A. FI~EDERICK S. WEINSTEIN, CPA, P.A. STEVEN M. BORISMAN, CPA, P.A. JOEL HOCH. CPA - RETIRED SAMUEL FRE¥, CPA- RETIRED FOURTH FLOOR 4875 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY FORT LAIJDERDALE, FLORIDA aa3o8-401o bROWaRD 954.351.9000 · DADE 305.947.77 17 fAX 954.3B1.9011 401 CAM[NO GARDENS BOULEVArd BOCA ~TON, FLORIDA 313431~-5810 56 [ .368.9~7 ~ FAX 561.39a .15El EMAIL: admin@hfzcpa.com April 5, 2002 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Board of Supervisors Port of the Islands Community Improvement District Naples, Florida We have audited the accompanying general-purpose financial statements of Port of the Islands Community Improvement District as of and for the year ended September 30, 2001 as listed in the table of contents. These general-purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the District's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general-purpose financial statements based on our audit. We conducted ot~r audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general-purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general-purpose financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall general- purpose financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the general-purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Port of the Islands Community Improvement District, as of September 30, 2001, and the results of its operations and the cash flows of its Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund for the year then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. As discussed in Note 3 to the general-purpose financial statements, several owners of property within the District have failed to pay their property taxes and assessments when due. As a result, the District has been unable to pay the Bond obligations since May 1, 2001. -2- Port of the Islands Community Improvement District April 5, 2002 Page Two 161 1 In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated April 5, 2002 on our consideration of Port of the Islands Community Improvement District's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general-purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary data listed in the table of contents is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the general-purpose financial statements of Port of the Islands Community Improvement District. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general-purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the general-purpose financial statements taken as a whole. HOCH, FP~EY a Z%JGMAI~ Certified Public Accountants -3- HocH, FRi~y fi: ZUGi~.AN, CPA's 161 1 ,< 0 f-- -4- HOCH, FREY & Zu(~l~kN, CPA's 161 PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 Debt Capital General Service Projects Fund Fund Fund REVENUES Assessments $273,509 Interest 3,257 Miscellaneous 400 Total Revenues 277,166 EXPENDITURES Current General Government Personal services Operating Total General Government Road and Street Personal services Operating Total Road and Street Debt Service Principal Interest and fees Total Debt Service Capital Outlay Total Expenditures EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES Fund Balances - Beginning of Year FUND BALANCES - END OF YEAR 4,500 68,159 72,659 62,549 94,717 157,266 0 0 229,925 47,241 172,897 $220.138 Totals (Memorandum Only) $ 603,951 $ 877,460 12,526 $ 2,909 18,692 400 616,477 2,909 896,552 0 0 0 Q 230,000 545,727 775,727 0 0 2,910 775,727 2,910 4,500 68,159 72,659 62,549 94,717 157,266 230,000 545,727 775,727 2,910 1,008,562 (159,250) (1) (112,010) 473,535 65,682 712,114 $ 314,285 $65,681 $ 600,104 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. -5- HOCH, FREY & ZUGlVlAlg, CPA's PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRII61 STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL AND DEBT SERVICE FUNDS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 REVENUES Assessments Interest Miscellaneous Total Revenues General Fund Variance Favorable/ Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget $314,351 $273,509 $(40,842) $746,000 4,000 3,257 (743) 0 0 400 400 318,351 277,166 (41,185) Debt Service Fund Actual Variance Favorable/ (Unfavorable) $ 603,951 $(142,049)- 12,526 12,526 746,000 616,477 (129,523) EXPENDITURES Current General Government Personal services Operating Capital outlay Total General Government 6,000 4,500 1,500 65,118 68,159 (3,041) 500 0 500 71,618 72,659 (1,041) 0 0 0 Road and Street Personal services 74,333 62,549 11,784 Operating 132,400 94,717 37,683 Capital outlay 40,000 0 40,000 Total Road and Street 246,733 157,266 89,467 0 0 0 Debt Service Principal Interest and fees Total Debt Service 0 0 0 365,000 230,000 135,000 440,400 545,727 (105,327) 805,400 775,727 29,673 Total Expenditures 318,351 229,925 88,426 805,400 775,727 29,673 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES 0 47,241 47,241 (59,400) (159,250) (99,850) Fund Balances - Beginning of Year 172,897 172,897 0 462,167 462,167 0 FUND BALANCES - END OF YEAR $172,897 $220:138 $ 47,241 $402,767 $ 302,917 $ (99,850) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. -6- Hoci-r, FREY & ZUGI~LiN, CPA's 161 PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 OPERATING REVENUES Charges for services Water and imgation water Sewer Meter fees Maintenance assessments Miscellaneous Total Operating Revenues OPERATING EXPENSES Personal services Materials, supplies, and services Bad debt expense Depreciation Total Operating Expenses Operating Loss NONOPERATING REVENUES/(EXPENSES) Interest earnings Interest expense Total Nonoperating Revenues/(Expenses) NET INCOME/(LOSS) Retained Eamings/(Deficit) - Beginning of Year RETAINED EARNINGS/(DEFICIT) - END OF YEAR $ 57,695 53,596 6,750 240,777 11,577 370,395 66,748 234,888 35,345 150,389 487,370 (116,975) 431 (2,355) (1,924) (118,899) (486,335) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. -7- Hock, F~¥ 8,: Ztro~taa, q, CPA's PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTWITIES Operating loss Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation (Increase)/decrease in assets: Accounts receivable Prepaid expenses Increase/(decrease) in liabilities: Accounts payable Customer deposits Due to other funds Total Adjustments Net Cash Used In Operating Activities CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES Purchases of equipment Interest paid Principal payments on long term debt Net Cash Used In Capital and Related Financing Activities CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Interest earnings NET DECREASE IN CASH Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $150,389 (38,318) 14,940 (12,629) 2,800 (17,574) (25,378) (2,355) (7,010) $(116,975) 99,608 (17,367) (34,743) 431 (51,679) 74,746 $ 23.067 NONCASH INVESTING, CAPITAL AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES Assets acquired through capital lease agreements $ 39,505 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. -8- HocH, FREY & ZUGlVtAN, CPA's 161 PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 NOTE 1 - REPORTING ENTITY Port of the Islands Community Improvement District ("the District") was created September 16, 1986 by Ordinance 86-64 of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, pursuant to the authority of Section 190 of the Florida Statutes for the purpose of establishing and maintaining a water and sewer system, road and drainage systems, and other systems and facilities as provided in that statute. In order to determine and define the reporting entity, the District applies the provisions set forth in Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 14, "The Financial Reporting Entity" ("GASB 14"). GASB 14 states that the reporting entity consists of the primary government, organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and other organizations which should be included because of the nature or significance of their relationships with the primary government. The District is the primary government and there are no other organizations included in accordance with GASB 14. All activities of the District are included in the funds described in Note 2 below. NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The accounting policies of the District conform to generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") as applicable to governments. The following is a summary of the more significant policies: GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES GENERAL FUND The General Fund is established to account for all financial transactions not properly accounted for in another fund. DEBT SERVICE FUND The Debt Service Fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, general long-term debt principal and interest. CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND The Capital Projects Fund is used to account for financial resources used for the construction of flood control facilities and related land improvements and those constructed for the water and sewer system. -9- HOCH, FRI!:y & ZUGI~_AI~/, CPA's 161 PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) PROPRIETARY FUND TYPE WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND The Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund is established to account for activities that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises. The costs of providing services to the residents are recovered primarily through user charges. ACCOUNT GROUPS GENERAL FIXED ASSETS AND GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT The general fixed assets and general long-term debt self-balancing groups of accounts are used solely to account for the long-term assets and liabilities that are not properly accounted for in the Governmental Funds. Purchases and sales of long-term assets are recorded as expenditures and revenues in the Governmental Funds. Maturities of long-term debt principal are recorded as expenditures in the Debt Service Fund. All property and equipment, including public domain general fixed assets (such as roads and canals) are recorded at cost. Those assets purchased by and used in the general operations of the District are accounted for in the general fixed assets group of accounts. No depreciation has been provided on general fixed assets. Donated fixed assets are recorded on the books at the estimated fair value at the date of donation. These two account groups are not "funds". They are concerned only with the measurement of financial position. They are not involved with measurement of results of operations. ENTERPRISE FUND FIXED ASSETS Those assets placed in service by and used in the utilities operations are accounted for at cost in the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund. Depreciation has been provided over the estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives range from 5 to 48 years. Donated fixed assets are reported at their estimated fair value on the date donated. TOTALS - (MEMORANDUM ONLY) COLUMNS The totals columns on the financial statements are captioned "Memorandum Only" to indicate that they are presented only to facilitate financial analysis. Data in these columns do not present financial position, results of operations, or cash flows in conformity ~vith GAAP. Neither is such data comparable to a consolidation. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. -10- HOCH, FRI~Y & ZUOl~tiN, CPA's 11 PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) BASIS OF ACCOUNTING Governmental funds are used to account for the District's general government activities. Governmental fund types use the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when susceptible to accrual (i.e., when they are "measurable and available"). The District considers all revenues available if they are collected within 60 days after the end of the year. Expenditures are recorded when the related fund liability is incurred, except for unmatured interest on general long-term debt which is recognized when due. Accrued interest on general long-term debt, not reflected in these statements at September 30, 2001 was $169,875. Interest and assessments are susceptible to accrual. Other receipts and permit fees become measurable and available when cash is received by the government and are recognized as revenue at that time. The Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund is accounted for using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when incUrred. In accounting and reporting for its Water and Sewer Fund, the District applies all applicable FASB pronouncements issued on or before November 30, 1989 that do not conflict with or contradict GASB pronouncements. BUDGETS On July 20, 2000, the District adopted the operating budgets for the current year. The Capital Projects Fund was not .budgeted. Unexpended balances expire at the end of the year. The District does not use formal encumbrance accounting. Legal budgetary control is exercised at the program (total expenditures) level. Accordingly, an overexpenditure is contrary to the law only if total expenditures exceed total appropriations. The basis of accounting applied to each Governmental Fund budget is the same as the basis utilized by each respective fund. The Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund budget is not GAAP basis and is presented only in the accompanying supplementary data. -11 - Hoc~z, FRay 8,: ZUGM. A2'¢, CPA's PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 161 1 NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) BUDGET/GAAP RECONCILIATION In the year ended September 30, 2000 (and only in that year), the Debt Service Fund budget differed from GAAP in that it did not include provisions for prepaid special assessments (see Note 6) or appropriations for bond principal paid with the proceeds from prepaid assessments. The following schedule reconciles the amounts on the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual to the amounts on the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances: Debt Service Fund Fund Balance - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual Prepaid assessments - Year 2000 Bond principal paid with the proceeds from prepaid assessments - Year 2000 $302,917 101,368 (90,000) Fund Balance - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances $314,285 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents in the Enterprise Fund equals cash and investments on the balance sheet for a total of $23,067. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE Accounts receivable reflected in the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund consist of charges to customers for serv/ce and availability. The District estimates amounts that are probably uncollectible and reports these amounts as bad debt expense and offsets accounts receivable with an allowance for doubtful accounts. At September 30, 2001, the allowance was $344,792. -12- HOCH, FREY & ZUGMAN, CPA's PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMM-JNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT1 6 ] NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 NOTE 2 - NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL Contributed capital includes a non-routine transfer of residual equity from the General Fund. Advances from the General Fund have supported cash flow shortages in recent years in the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund. Improvements are constructed in the Capital Projects Fund and transferred fi-om General Fixed Assets to the Enterprise Fund when complete. Special Assessment Bonds finance the construction and the asset transfers to the Enterprise Fund are accounted for as contributed capital. Improvements constructed and dedicated to the District by the developer and other private sources are accounted for as contributed capital. Contributed capital did not change during the year. PROPERTY TAX CALENDAR Assessments are validated with the Collier County Property Appraiser and collected by the Collier County Tax Collector. The key dates in the property tax cycle are as follows: Precedin~ Fiscal Year Enforceable lien date Assessment roll validated Assessments levied January 1 July 1 July 20 Current Fiscal Year Beginning of fiscal year for which assessments have been levied Assessment bills rendered Assessment due date Delinquent tax lien Tax certificates sold October 1 November 1 March 31 April 30 June 1 STATUS OF THE DISTRICT Several owners of property within the District which are subject to the assessment levies have failed to pay their property taxes and assessments when due. In past years, these amounts have been paid either prior to, or as a result of, tax certificate sales. However, since 1999 approximately twenty-eight percent of the District's assessments remain uncollected when no one bought the tax certificates. As a result, the District has been unable to maintain the reserve account required by the Bond Indenture since May 1999, and has been unable to pay the Bond obligations since May 1, 2001. -13- HocH, Fa~.¥ & Zuo~N, CPA's PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 NOTE 3 - NOTE 4 - STATUS OF THE DISTRICT (Continued) The District attempted to negotiate a refunding issue with the Bondholder that could have ameliorated the financial problems faced by the District. However, due to the number of property owners who are delinquent in paying their assessments, the Bondholder determined a refunding was not in its best interest, and thus withdrew from negotiations. The District has in the past, and continues to levy its Benefits Special Assessments in accordance with the law and the terms of the Bond Indenture. The 2001 Debt Service Assessments were stratified for billing and collection. Seven delinquent accounts (developers) were assessed directly by the District in the amount of $471,340. As of October 3,2001, the District had collected the assessments from two of the developers that were directly assessed. These two collections amounted to $119,268. The intended effect of direct assessing is to give the District the option to join any tax certificate holders in any foreclosure on the properties. Currently, there have been no foreclosures instituted. The remainder of the assessment roll was submitted to Collier County for billing and collection. Of the assessments billed by Collier County, approximately 68% ($588,000) were collected. On October 19, 2001, the District collected, from one developer, back assessments in the amount of $203,004. The Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund has had a retained earnings deficit for three years. Bad debt expense and depreciation expense are major reasons for the declining equity in the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund. Depreciation expense has exceeded $100,000 annually since 1994 when a substantial wastewater treatment plant and systems were placed in service. Bad debt expense, totaling $344,000 in the last five years, consists of uncollectible standby (availability) revenues. The District sets and adjusts the utilities service rates to cover its budgeted operating expenses in its Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund. On August 16, 2001, the District's Board approved a 58% increase in the water and sewer standby fees. The increase will amount to $150,000 annually. Collections are expected to approximate 68%. The additional revenues are to be reserved for renewal and replacement of the water and sewer facilities. CASH AND INVESTMENTS The District's investment policy for surplus funds conforms to Florida Statute 218.415(17) and provides that the District may invest or reinvest any surplus public funds in their control or possession in: (a) The Local Govemment Surplus Funds Trust Fund, or any intergovernmental investment pool authorized pursuant to the Flor/da Interlocal Cooperation Act. -14- Hoc}x, Fx~v.¥ & Zuo~, CPA's NOTE 4 - 161 PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 CASH AND INVESTMENTS (Continued) 1 (b) Securities and Exchange Commission registered money market funds with the highest credit quality rating from a nationally recognized rating agency. (c) Interest-bearing time deposits or savings accounts in qualified public depositories. (d) Direct obligations of the U.S. Treasury. The securities listed in paragraphs (c) and (d) shall be invested to provide sufficient liquidity to pay obligations as they come due. The District's Bond resolutions provide similar limitations on authorized investment securities. The Florida State Board of Administration Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund is operated and regulated by the State of Florida and is an external investment pool that is not registered with the SEC as an investment company, but nevertheless has a policy that it will, and does, operate in a manner consistent with the SEC's Rule 2a7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (! 7 Code of Federal Regulations Section 270.2a-7). Rule 2a7 allows SEC-registered mutual funds to use amortized cost rather than market value to report net assets to compute share prices if certain conditions are met. Those conditions include restrictions on the types of investments held, restrictions on the term-to-maturity of individual investments and the dollar-weighed average of the portfolio, requirements for portfolio diversification, requirements for divestiture considerations in the event of security downgrades and defaults, and required actions if the market value of the portfolio deviates from amortized cost by a specified amount. The District's investment in this account is reported at cost, which approximates the District's share of the fair value of the pool's underlying securities. The 1990 Bond Resolution provides that the District may invest debt service funds only in U.S. Treasury obligations, repurchase agreements (if the trustee takes possession of the underlying collateral), or certificates of deposit at qualified banking institutions. Investments in the bond accounts are reported at fair value, which approximates cost. All deposits and investments during and at the end of the year were in compliance with the District's investment policy and the Bond resolution. The following is a schedule of the District's cash and investments at September 30, 2001: Insured - FDIC Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund Money market fund collateralized by U.S. Treasury Securities held by and registered to the Bond Trustee Totals (Memorandum Only) Cash Investments $35,947 $35:947 $133,906 206,482 $34O:388 -15- Hocx~, FI~E¥ ~ ZUGi~_~, CPA's PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 161 NOTE 5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT The following is a schedule of changes in general fixed assets: Beginning of Assets Year Purchased End of Year Equipment Construction in progress Improvements other than buildings $ 13,161 $ 13,161 $2,910 2,910 1,656,646 1,656,646 Total $1,669,807 $2,910 $1,672,717 The following is a schedule of changes in Enterprise Fund fixed assets: Improvements Construction Water and Sewer Other Than in Enterprise Fund Land Buildings Equipment Progress Total Balance-Beginning of Year $90,480 $5,388,563 $40,066 $ 0 $5,519,109 Additions 22,976 40,032 1,875 64,883 Dispositions (3,361) (3,361) BALANCE-END OF YEAR $90,480 $5,408,178 $80,098 $1.87____~5 $5,580,631 Accumulated Depreciation: Balance - Beginning of Year Depreciation expense Dispositions $1,020,517 $13,694 $1,034,211 142,196 8,193 150,389 (3,361) (3,361) BALANCE - END OF YEAR $1.159.35__~_________~2 $21,887 $1.181.23~9 NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT $4,399,392 As discussed in Note 6, a backhoe was lease-purchased by the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund for $39,505 during the year. The lessor holds a security interest in the equipment until the lease is paid in full. -16- HocH, FR~.Y 8: ZUGMAlV, CPA's 161 PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM DEBT GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT BONDS PAYABLE Special Assessment Bonds Series 1990 were issued October 25, 1990 in the amount of $7,000,000 to finance the acquisition, construction and installation of the District's Water Management System and Water and Sewer System. The District covenants to levy special assessments in annual amounts adequate to provide for payment of debt service and reserve requirements. However, the Series 1990 Bonds do not constitute a direct indebtedness of the District and payment of principal and interest on the Bonds is dependent on the money available in the Debt Service Accounts and the District's ability to collect special assessments levied. For the current year, the District levied $746,000 of debt service assessments but collected only $316,000 leaving $430,000 uncollected and delinquent. The District also collected $115,000 in delinquent special assessments from 1999 and 2000. The Series 1990 Bonds are reported as long-term debt of the District in accordance with GAAP because the District is obligated in some manner to assume payment of the related debt service in the event of default by the property owners. In certain circumstances, if any property is offered for sale for the nonpayment of any benefit special assessments, and no person purchases the same for an amount at least equal to the full amount due on the benefit special assessments, the District may purchase the property for an amount equal to the balance due on the benefit special assessments and any other due and unpaid taxes and assessments, but only from legally available funds of the District. Interest is payable on the first day of each May and November at a rate of 9% per annum. Special assessments may be prepaid in part or in whole at the option of the landowner. On the next interest payment date after special assessments are prepaid, the District is required to use the prepaid special assessment proceeds to redeem Bonds at par plus accrued interest. The Bonds are subject to optional redemption by the District on or after May 1, 2000. Mandatory principal payments are payable on a schedule through May 1, 2011. During the year the District redeemed Bonds in the amount of $230,000 of which $120,000 was paid from prepaid assessments. Total Bonds payable was reduced from $4,760,000 to $4,530,000. -17- Hoc~I, FREY & ZUGMAN, CPA's NOTE 6 o 161 1 PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued) BONDS PAYABLE (Continued) The following is a schedule of debt service requirements for the next five years and thereafter: Year Ending September 30, Principal Interest TOtal 2002 $ 345,000 $ 407,700 $ 752,700 2003 380,000 376,650 756,650 2004 415,000 342,450 757,450 2005 450,000 305,100 755,100 2006 490,000 264,600 754,600 ThereaRer 2,450,000 575,100 3,025,100 Total $4,530.000 $2,271,600 $6,801.600 WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FLINT) LEASE PAYABLE On November 20, 2000, the District entered into a lease purchase agreement with John Deere Credit, Inc. for the purchase of a wheel loader backhoe. Purchase price of the backhoe was $39,505. The lease is for five years. The nominal interest rate is 7.150%. Payments are $780 per month. Principal balance on the note was reduced from $39,505 to $32,495, at September 30, 2001. The following is a schedule of the debt service requirement for the lease purchase agreement for the next four years: Minimum Year Ending Lease September 30 Payrnents 2002 $ 9,365 2003 9,365 2004 9,365 2005 9,365 Total 37,460 Less: Amount representing interest (4,965) Present value of minimum lease payments $32,495 -18- HOCH, FREY & ZUOI~-_AN, CPA's PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 161 NOTE 7 - NOTE 8 - DESIGNATIONS OF FUND EQUITY AND RESERVES At the August 16, 2001 Board meeting, the District established a designation of fund balance for roadxvay maintenance. Funds designated for roadway maintenance would be kept in an account with the State Board of Administration. The amount sent to the State Board of Administration at September 30, 2001 was $67,200. DEBT SERVICE RESERVE The 1990 Special Assessment Bond indenture requires the establishment of a reserve account equal to 10% of the gross proceeds of the Bonds. The reserve requirement is $700,000. However, due to the inability to collect special assessments, moneys in the reserve account have been used to pay debt service. The balance in the reserve account at September 30, 2001 was $8,051. ASSESSMENTS AND COLLECTIONS The District levies assessments for maintenance, debt service and utility availability. On seven large parcels (approximately 63%), the debt service assessments are assessed directly by the District, otherwise all of the assessments are turned over to Collier County for billing and collection as described in Note 2 above. The District also collects debt service prepaid special assessments at the landowners' option as described in Note 6 above. The following is a schedule of assessments levied and assessments collected for the year ended September 30, 2001' General Fund Maintenance current Maintenance prior years Total Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund Availability- Current Availability - Prior years Total Assessments Assessments Levied Collected $314,351 $222,521 50,988 $314,351 $273,509 $248,082 $168,426' ...37,006 *Net of bad debt expense -19- HocI-t, Fa~.¥ & Zu~_~N, CPA's PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 NOTE 8 - NOTE 9 - NOTE 10 - NOTE ASSESSMENTS AND COLLECTIONS (Continued) Debt Service Fund Assessed by county - Current Assessed by county - Prior years Assessed by District Prepaid assessments Assessments Assessments Lev/ed Collected $274,660 $196,651 115,010 471,340 119,268 173,022 Total $746:000 $603..951 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS The District participates in a Defined Contribution Pension Plan. The plan is qualified under Sections 401(a), 403(a), and 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan is administered by independent trustees. All employees who meet the one-year length-of-service requirement are qualified to participate. Employees are prohibited from making voluntary contributions to the plan. The District's required contribution is 6% of the total salaries of qualified participants. Total salaries for the year were $96,595. Total salaries of qualified participants were $96,595. Each participant's nonforfeitable percentage of his employer's contribution account increases (vests) 20% for each year of service. Employer contributions for the period totaled $5,792 and are included in personal services expenditures of the General and Water and Sewer Funds. RISK MANAGEMENT The District is exposed to various risks of losses related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees, and natural disasters. The District carries commercial insurance to handle these various risks of losses. Claims, expenditures, and liabilities would have been reported if it were probable that a loss in excess of policy limits had occurred and the amount of that loss could be reasonably estimated. CONTINGENCIES A landowner ("Debtor"), which has filed for protection under Chapter l 1 of the bankruptcy code, has filed a complaint against the District seeking a determination of the validity of the District's assessment methodology. Debtor has asked the court to reduce its prior years' assessments by $1,157,488. If Debtor were to prevail, then it is expected that the court would instruct the District to redetermine the apportionment of the debt service and maintenance assessments, which could reallocate the prior years' assessments among the landowners. - 20 - HocIt, FRI~Y ~: ZUO~N, CPA's PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 161 NOTE 11 - CONTINGENCIES (Continued) The owner of the District's Bonds has joined in the defense and, together with the District, they have taken the position that the Debtor's case is without merit, and are actively defending the position that the assessment liens are valid. The proceedings are in the early stages and the probability that the District's defense will prevail is currently uncertain. The District's exposure to liability cannot currently be measured. Accordingly, there is no provision in these financial statements for any liability that the District may incur as a result of this matter. -21 - HOCH, FREY & ZUGI~IAN, CPA's HocI-I, F E¥ & ZuG CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS A PARTNEI~SH~P OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS D.~V~D B. ZUGM~-N, CPA, P.A.. D~.VID 151. BLACK, CPA, P.A. FREDERIC~r $. WEINS~rEXN, CPA-, P.A. STEV~N M. BOR~SM~>*, CPA, P.A. JOEL HOCH, CP-A- - RETIRED SAMUEL FREY, CP_A~ - RETIRED FOURTH FLOOR 4875 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY FORT LAUDI~RDALE, FLORIDA 3~08'z~610 BROWABD 954.35I .9000 · DADE 305.947 ,77 I7 FAX 954.35 I . 90 I I 401 cAm~NO GARDeNs BOULEVARD BOCA ~TON, FLO]~IDA 561.368.927~ FAX 56 ~ .39~: EMAIL: admin@hfzcpa.com April 5, 2002 1 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING The Board of Supervisors Port of the Islands Community Improvement District Naples, Florida We have audited the accompanying general-purpose financial statements of Port of the Islands Community Improvement District, as of and for the year ended September 30, 2001, and have issued our report thereon dated April 5; 2002, which emphasized that the District has been unable to pay the Bond obligations since May 1, 2001. We conducted our audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether Port of the Islands Community Improvement District's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered Port of the Islands Community Improvement District's internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. - 22 - Port of the Islands Community Improvement District April 5, 2002 Page Two 161 1 However, we noted other matters involving the internal control over financial reporting that we have reported to the management of Port of the Islands Community Improvement District in our management letter dated April 5, 2002. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, Collier County and various departments of the State of Florida, and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. - HOcH, FREY & ~rUGMANg Certified Public Accountants -23 - HOCH, FREy 8( ZUGI~IXN, CPA's Hoci-i, FREY & ZUGM_A_ CERTIFIED PUBLIC aCCOUNTaNTS A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS D~.VID B. Zuo~f~.~, CPA, P.A. D~.vID B. BI2. C~{, CPA, P,A. FREDERICK S. WEINSTEI~, CPA, P.A. STEVEN ~. DORISMAN, CPA, JOEL HocH, CPA - RETIRED SAMUEL FREY. CPA - RETIRED 161 FOURth FLOOR 4875 NORTH FEDERAL hIGhWAY FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA :3~:308-4610 BROWARD 954.351 .9000 · DADE 305.947.7717 FAX 954,351 .90~ ~ 401 CAMINO GARDENS BOULEVARD BOCA R~TON, FLORIDA ~1114~2-5810 561 .368.927~ FAX 561.392.15~1 EMAIL: admin@hfzcpa.com April 5, 2002 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' MANAGEMENT LETTER The Board of Supervisors Port of the Islands Community Improvement District Naples, Florida Gentlemen: This letter is written in conjunction with our audit of the general-purpose financial statements of Port of the Islands Community Improvement District, as of and for the year ended September 30, 2001. The purpose of this letter is to communicate to you our comments and recommendations, and to comply with the requirements of Chapter 10.550 Rules of the Auditor General. Disposition of Prior Year Findings and Recommendation: Prior Year Finding: In our pr/or year management letter, we reported that the District was in a state of financial emergency due to deficits and its inability to pay debt service on its Special assessment bonds beginning with the payments due May 1,2001. Recommendation: We had previously recommended that the District should increase their water and sewer utility rates. Disposition: On August 16, 2001, the District raised the rate of standby fees by 58%. There has been no increase in the rates for water and sewer user fees. The increase in standby fees is projected to provide $100,000 annually to be reserved for renewals and replacements in the water and sewer facilities. - 24 - Port of the Islands Community Improvement District April 5, 2002 Page Two 161 1 Current Year Findings and Recommendations: Finding Number One: The District continued in a state of financial emergency as a consequence of conditions described in Section 218.503(1) Florida Statutes. On May 1, 2001 the District failed to make its Special Assessment Bond Debt Service payment when due. The District paid only part of the debt service that was due May 1,2001 and has not paid any since that date. The total of Bond principal and interest due annually is approximately $750,000. Further, the District has not been able to maintain the balance in the Debt Service Reserve account required in the Bond Indenture. The Debt Service Reserve account only had $8,051 at September 30, 2001, while the requirement is $700,000. The District has reported the conditions that constitute the financial emergency to the appropriate personnel in the Florida Governor's Office. Several owners of the property within the District have failed to pay their special assessments when due. In past years, the county sold tax certificates and the District received its share of the proceeds. For 1999 and 2000, 34% of the assessments remained uncollected when no one bought the tax certificates. The Bondholder, acting under provisions of the Series 1990 Special Assessment Bond Indenture, directed the District to directly assess the 2001 debt service assessments on seven properties whose owners had continually failed to pay their assessments when due. The Bondholder determined that the District would be in a better position to foreclose on properties if the District would directly assess the property owners rather than using the county tax appraiser and tax collector. The goal is to eventually clear the properties' outstanding certificate debt so these properties could be developed. As of October 3, 2001, two of the property owners that were directly assessed have paid the assessments. The Bondholder has not yet directed the District to begin foreclosures due to complications arising from the lawsuit discussed in Note 11 of the financial statements. For the year ended September 30, 2001, the District assessed approximately $275,000 of debt service special assessments through the county tax appraiser and tax collector. The District directly assessed approximately $471,000 of debt service special assessments. Collections were approximately 72% and 25% respectively. The District and the Bondholder and their respective attorneys continue to pursue successful collection alternatives. Recommendation: The District should continue to coordinate with its attomeys and the Bondholder to determine the appropriate timing and extent to exercise legal methods, including foreclosure if necessary, to collect the District's debt service special assessments. Further, due to the 72% collection experience with the properties assessed through the county, the District should determine if more landowners should be directly assessed. - 25 - HOCH, FREY & ZUGI~-~N, CPA's Port of the Islands Community Improvement Disthct April 5, 20O2 Page Three 161 1 Finding Number Two: We applied financial condition assessment procedures pursuant to General, to determine if deteriorating financial conditions exist. significantly deteriorated over the past three years. Section 10.556(8), Rules of the Auditor The District's financial condition has The District's primary revenue source is assessments. The District received all of the assessments that had been levied through the year ended September 30, 1998. However, some of these collections were attributable to sales of tax certificates after certain property owners failed to pay their taxes to the county tax collector. After that year, investors were no longer willing to purchase tax certificates. As a result, in the next three years the District collected an average of 72% of the amounts assessed. There are several effects of this revenue loss. The Debt Service problem is discussed in our first finding and in the notes to the financial statements. There were operating losses in years 1999, 2000 and 2001 combined amounting to a total of $136,000 before depreciation. During that three-year period, the losses were $53,000 in the General Fund and $83,000 in the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund. However, the operations of the District have proceeded and the District has been able to pay its operating expenses as they come due using cash fi.om prior years' surpluses. Cash balances and unreserved fund balances/retained earnings are below desirable levels compared with current liabilities and total expenditures, respectively. At September 30, 2001, the combined total of cash, investments and receivables in the General and the Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds was $265,000. The District's engineer has scheduled the replacement cost and life expectancy of the water and sewer facilities as well as studied increasing the utility service rates in order to provide for the renewal and replacement of the water and wastewater plant facilities. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, an increase in the rates for water and sewer standby fees is expected to bring in $100,000 annually beginning in November 2001. These projected profits are to be placed in a renewal and replacement fund. There has been no increase in the rates for water and sewer user fees during the last three years. There was an increase of $50 (now $309) per unit in the rate for maintenance assessments for the year 2001 and no increase in maintenance assessments per unit for the year 2002. Recommendations: The District should continue to closely monitor its cash flows. All revenue sources should be continually considered for rate increases. - 26 - HOCH, FREY 8: ZUGMAN, CPA's Port of the Islands Community Improvement District April 5, 2002 Page Four 161 The following statements relate to requirements of the Auditor General: 1) There were no other findings or recommendations reported for the preceding audit. 2) The District has complied with the provisions of Section 218.415, Florida Statutes regarding the investment of public funds. 3) There were no other violations of laws, rules, regulations or contractual provisions discovered during our audit. 4) There were no illegal or improper expenditures discovered during our audit. 5) There were no other matters requiting correction discovered during our audit. 6) The financial report filed with the Florida Department of Banking and Finance, pursuant to Section 218.32(1)(a), Florida Statutes, is in agreement with the annual financial audit report for the period ended September 30, 2001. Very truly yours, HOCH, FREY & ZUGMAN Certified Public Accountants - 27 - HOCH, FREY & Zu61~q, CPA's 161 1 AUDITEE'S RESPONSE TO MANAGEMENT LETTER COMMENTS PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 Management's Response. The District is currently in discussions with the Bondholder regarding foreclosure of the properties that were directly assessed by the District in accordance with the auditors recommendation. II. Management's Response. The District issues monthly financial reports to the Board of Supervisors which currently reflect positive cash flow in both operating funds. However, the District will continue to closely monitor it's cash flow in accordance with the auditors recommendations. Submitted this 30th day of August, 2002, Port of the Islands Community Improvement District By: - 28 - PORT OF THE ISLANDS COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 (BUDGET ACCOUNTING BASIS) The budget is prepared on the accrual basis of accounting with major adjustments as indicated in the reconciliation below: Budget Actual REVENUES Charges for services Water/sewer $116,500 $111,291 Maintenance assessments 240,777 240,777 Meter fees 10,000 6,750 Interest 500 431 Miscellaneous 0 11,577 Total Revenues 367,777 370,826 EXPENSES Personal services Materials, supplies and services Renewals and replacement Bad debt expense Total Expenses Operating Income 80,444 66,748 212,873 234,631 5,526 257 68,934 35,345 367,777 336,981 0 33,845 Reconciliation With Reported Net Income/(Loss) Depreciation Interest expense NET INCOME/(LOSS) (150,389) (2,355) $(118,899) - 29 - HOCH, FREY 8: ZUGI~IAN, CPA's 161 1 o - 30 - Hoc~i, FREY & ZUGI~_A_~, CPA's Por~ of ~he Islands Community Improvement District Financial Reporting Sep[ember 20, 2002 Table of Contents 161 1 Financial Statements - August 31, 2002 II. Special Assessment Receipts - Fiscal Year 2002 III. Check Register - September 20, 2002 IV. Bank Statement - August 31, 2002 8 © II ]. Reuer//.les Maintenance Assessments Interest/Miscellaneous Income Total Revenues Port of the Islands Community Improvement District General Fund Statement of Revenues & Expenditures For Period Ending August 31, 2002 General Fund Prorated Budget Actual Budget thru 08/31/02 thru 08/31/02 Variance $308,115 $308,115 $266,107 ($42,008) $3,200 $2,933 $5,544 $2,611 $311,315 $311,048 $271,651 ($39,397)[[ Administrative Expenditures Supervisors Fees Engineering Fees Attorney's Fees Annual Audit Management Fees Accounting Recording Secretary Computer Fees Rebate Calculation Trustee Fees Property Appraiser Assessment Roll Travel & Per Diem Telephone Postage Rentals & Leases Insurance Printing & Binding Legal Advertising Other Current Charge Office Supplies Dues & Licenses Capital Outlay Total Administrative Expenditures [ $6,000 $12000 $12,000 $4,700 $10,635 $4,925 $3,128 $750 $625 $1,310 $4,537 $8,000 $250 $100 $2,500 $1,200 $5,900 $350 $1,000 5200 $350 $175 $500 $5,500 $4,800 $700 $11,000 $13,888 ($2,888) $11,000 $9,506 $1,494 $4,700 $4,950 ($250) $9,749 $9,749 $0 $4,515 $4,515 (50) $2,867 $2,867 ($0) $688 $688 $0 $625 $625 $0 $1,310 $1,208 $102 $4,537 $0 $4,537 $7,333 $7,333 ($0) $229 $0 $229 $92 $105 ($14) $2,292 $1,750 $542 $1,1oo $1,1oo $o $5,900 $4,453 $1,447 $321 $820 ($499) $917 $1,328 ($411) $183 $224 ($41) $321 $35 $286 $175 $175 $0 $458 $0 $458 $81,135 $75,811 $70,119 $5,692 -2- Port of the Islands Community Improvement District 161 General Fund Statement of Revenues & Expenditures For Period Ending August 31, 2002 General Ftmd Prorated Budget Actual Budget thru 08/31/02 thru 08/31/02 Maintenance Expenditures Personnel FICA Expense Health Insurance Pension Workers Compensation Landscape Maintenance Street Lighting Irrigation Rentals & Leases Maintenance - Roads Maintenance - Drainage Mosquito Control Repairs & Maintenance Operating Supplies Capital Outlay $60,638 $4,639 $4066 $3638 $2500 $60000 $19000 $55O0 $~ 700 $~ 000 $2 500 $1~ 500 $5 000 $1,500 $40,000 Total Maintenance Expenditures Variance Total Expenditures Excess Revenues (Expenditures) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $55,584 $49,899 $5,685 $4,252 $3,800 $452 $3,727 $5,951 ($2,224) $3,335 $1,450 $1,885 $2,500 $2,266 $235 $55,000 $47,541 $7,459 $17,417 $16,693 $724 $5,042 $2,360 $2,681 $2,475 $1,971 $504 $4,583 $0 $4,583 $2,292 $0 $2,292 $12,375 $13,171 ($796) $5,000 $5,467 ($467) $1,375 $124 $1,251 $36,667 $0 $36,667 $230,180 $211,623 $150,693 $60,930 $311,315 $287,434 $220,812 $66,622 $0 $50,839 $219,738 $270,577 -3- Revenues Special Assessments Prepaid Assessments Interest Income Total Revenues Port of the Islands Community Improvement District 161 Debt Service Fund Statement of Revenues & Expenditures For Period Ending August 31, 2002 Debt Service Prorated Budget Actual Budget thru 08/31/02 thru 08/31/02 Variance $766,350 $766,350 $229,968 ($536,382) $0 $0 $217,129 $217,129 $0 $0 $5,717 $5,717 $766,350 $766,350 $452,814 ($313,536)I Expenditures Principal Expense Interest Expense Special Call Other Debt Service Costs Total Expenditures Excess Revenues (Expenditures) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $345,000 $345,000 $0 $345,000 $436,050 $436,050 $0 $436,050 $60,000 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $15,000 $15,000 $183,706 ($168,706) $856,050 $856,050 $183,706 $672,344 ($89,700) ($89,700) $269,108 $358,808 $278,025 $314,285 $188,325 $583,394 -4- Revenues Interest Income Total Revenues Port of the Islands Community Improvement District Capital Projects Fund Statement of Revenues & Expenditures For Period Ending August 31, 2002 161 1 Capita Projects Prorated Budget Actual Budget thru 08/31/02 thru 08/31/02 Variance $0 $0 $978 $978 $0 $0 $978 $978 Expenditures Capital Outlay Total Expenditures Other Financing Sources(Uses) Inter fund Transfer Out Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) Excess Revenues and other Financing Sources Over(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $0 $o ($2,910) $2,910 $0 $0 ($2,910) $2,910I $0 $0 $69,529 ($69,529) $0 $0 $69,529 ($69,529)1] I $0 $0 ($65,641) ($68,551)1 [ $0 $65,681 ] I $0 $40 I -5- Port of the Islands Community Improvement District 161 1' Water & Sewer Statement of Revenues & Expenditures For Period Ending August 31, 2002 Water & Sewer Prorated Budget Actual Bud~;et thru 08/31/02 thru 08/31/02 Variance Revenues Standby Fees Sewer Revenue Water Revenue Irrigation Revenue Meter Fees Interest Income $391,119 $391,119 $317,546 ($73,573) $73,336 $67,225 $48,313 ($18,911) $40,172 $36,824 $30,423 ($6,401) $30,576 $28,028 $19,541 ($8,487) $5,250 $4,813 $10,975 $6,163 $500 $500 $5,729 $5,229 Total Revenues $540,953 $528,509 $432,528 ($95,981)11 Administrative Expenditures Supervisors Fees Engineering Fees Legal Fees Annual Audit Management Fees Accounting Fees Recording Secretary Computer Services Trustee Fees Property Appraiser Arbitrage Calculation Utility Billing Travel & Per Diem Telephone Postage Rentals & Leases Insurance Printing & Binding Legal Advertising Other Current Charge Office Supplies Capital Outlay Bad Debt $6,000 $5,500 $5,200 $300 $12,000 $11,000 $13,888 ($2,888) $12,000 $11,000 $9,958 $1,042 $4,700 $4,700 $4,950 ($250) $10,635 $9,749 $9,749 $0 $4,925 $4,515 $4,515 ($0) $3,128 $2,867 $2,867 ($0) $750 $688 $688 $0 $1,310 $1,201 $0 $1,201 $5,037 $5,037 $0 $5,037 $625 $625 $625 $0 $8,500 $7,792 $7,792 $0 $250 $229 $0 $229 $100 $92 $105 ($14) $2,500 $2,292 $1,822 $470 51,200 $1,100 $1,100 $0 $16,500 $16,500 $13,874 $2,626 $350 $321 $553 ($233) $1,000 $917 $1,328 ($411) $500 $458 $1,244 ($786) $350 $321 $219 $102 $500 $458 $0 $458 $9O,258 $82,736 $0 $82,736 Total Administrative $183,118 $170,096 $80,477 $89,620 -6- Port of the Islands Community Improvement District 161 Water & Sewer Statement of Revenues & Expenditures For Period Ending August 31, 2002 Water & Sewer Prorated Budget Actual Budset thru 08/31/02 thru 08/31/02 Variance Maintenance Expenditures Personnel FICA Expense Health Insurance Pension Workers Compensation Contractual Services Telephone Utilities Rentals & Leases Repairs & Maintenance Operating Supplies Licenses Renewal & Replacement $60,638 $4,639 $4,066 $3,638 $2,5O0 $25,000 $4,000 $27,500 $13,500 $40,000 $50,000 $1,500 $95~000 $55,584 $49,896 $5,688 $4,252 $3,800 $452 $3,727 $3,630 $97 $3,335 $1,450 $1,885 $2,500 $2,266 $235 $22,917 $15,921 $6,995 $3,667 $3,398 $269 $25,208 $23,632 $1,577 $12,375 $10,996 $1,379 $36,667 $37,482 ($815) $45,833 $56,153 ($10,320) $1,375 $96 $1,279 $8Z083 $11,854 $75,230 Total Maintenance Total Expenditures Net Income (Loss) $331,980 $304,523 $220,573 $83,951 $515,098 $474,620 $301,049 $173,570 $25,856 $131,479 Other Financing Sources(Uses) Interftmd Transfer In Reclaimed Water Project Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) Beginning Retained Earnings Ending Retained Earnings $0 $0 $69,529 ($69,529) $0 $0 ($118,126) $118,126 I $0 $0 ($48,597) $48,597] I ($604,571) I I ($521,689) I 1 -7- Port of the Islands Community Improvement District Special Assessment Receipts Fiscal Year 2002 September 20, 2002 Receipts Date ! Description i Net Receipts 11/02/01 #1400000344 $3,690.04 11 / 1470i i #300026~0 ' - g¥7-,~9-3.30 12/13/01 #300027961 $180,507.62 12/31/01 #300028672 $57,488.59 01/22/02 #300029037 $31,776.22 01/29/02 #300029134 $123.59 02/04/02 ~ #140000371 I $1,922.26 02/20/02 . #30002_9293 03/04/02#1400000381 $38,168.14 03/20/02 i__ #300029492 i . ~57A9~3'-5-3 04/02/021 #1400000391 $1,973.75 64 A 5765- ~ -#5660-25~il ~- $69.99 04/26/021 #300029854 : $1,350.68 -6g7517o2 I #300029929 I $42,291.04 o67i8/6-2-' ! #300029987 I $28,448.17 o6?o4/02 r #1400000408 $2,025.23 07/05702- #1'400006~17 '- $~-7,~06.69 · 0~2]'~'765 7-~ #300030034 $4,928.76 0721'~0~ ~- ~00-630060 ..... : .... $96~-8- 08/66702 -~-- ~30~b-3-00§7 ~ Total i $813,621.13 On Roll Assessments I Amount ! ! Assessments Assessments To be i Assessed I Percentage I Collected Transferred ~ Transferred O&M ! $308,094.87 32.71% $266,106.69 ($266,106.69) $0.00 W~S --~ ] $367,650.83 39.03% $317,546.17 ($317,541.82) $4.35 D-cbt Service i $266,254.27i 28.26% $229,968.27 i ($229,965.11) $3.16 Total I $941,999.96! 100.00% ! $813,621.13I ($813,613.62)i $7.51 161 1 Off Roll Assessments Property Parcel Amount i Amount I Balance Check i Owner No. Assessed i Paid Discounts I Due No. i Date H~rbc~ ~lub-~evel-op-~eni~ IX- M-1 ~ $56,545.32 $56,545.32 I $0.00 $0.00 t ---, 02/28/02 Harbor Club Develo ment Inc IX M-2 $52,325.52 ........ P~ ...... - Olde Florida Investments Ltd XI i $30,474.72 I United Trust Financial Corp ~ XIV ~ $46,437.65 I The Olde Florida Land Trust XI 4 $105,935.95 , , N0rth]"ort O~Teiopm~nt, In~i" i '- XI ; $111,740.65-~( ' Total ' $421,005.901 $74,091.41 ; $0.00 i $0.00 ' Total Assessment $1,423,133.52 Port of the Islands Community Improvement District Special Assessment Receipts Fiscal Year 2002 September 20, 2002 1 Interfund Transfers Date ] W&S DS Total 12/04/01 $73,433.50 $53,180.85 $126,614.35 01/08/02 -i $92,8-86.95" ~7-~6-9.11-'-~160,~.b~ 0220~_/~_:~'_~ .......$1-~J,01~6 ...... -~§~8~8- $21,383.34 03/06/02 $6,781.74 $4,911.37 $11,693.11 03/12/02 [- $]4,8c)~i~5 .... ~; 1 O, 78-8~71 ~- --~,~4:7~ '04/10/02 ~-' $25~92.25 ! $14~'~53.50- $39,815.75 04/24)05--1 .... g36,8~261 ........ §56,,6~i~29 $63,475.90 60;0620-21 ~1~ $ ~2~3~4- $29,368.06 06~:2~'b~. ~ $11,102.97 ~_ $8,040.82 $19,143.79 07/2~,/6~ 7 ~-~7~.42- ~ $572.42 $1,362.84 0821626:/ 7 ~28}3~871'1§1 - ~20750~'8-87- ..... $48-'.829'p3 Total I $317,541.82[ $229,965.11 I $547,506.93 Port of the Islands Community Improvement District Summary of Check Registers September 20, 2002 General Fund Date Check No. Amount 1 08/03/02 - 09/10/02 Water & Sewer Fund 724- 759 $105,921.63 Date Check No. Amount 08/03/02- 09/10/02 1632- 1698 $44,016.61 Total $149,938.24 161 1 o~ 8 ~H 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o~o~o~o o~o~o o o o o S So~ S S S S S S S S S 161 0 E~ E~E~ ,--4 d o o o o o o' o cD o cD 0 cz, c~ 0 o~ CO o o o o o~ o~ 0 r~ o~ CD 0 0 0 >~ © 0 c~ 161 I 0 0 0 X -0 0 > 0 r~ 0 r~ 0 o 0 H o~ o 0 © © C~ © o~ o o 0 o~ o 0 H co o o o 0 H © r~ © g 0 offi o 0 o~ r~ ,,~ E~ 0 E~ o~ 0o LA 0 0 cq t~. CD E~ 0 cq o 0 ~ 0 o o o~o o o o o ~°~~°~° ~ ° o o ~~O~O~O~O~O~O~OH~ ~ ~° ~° ~° 88 ~o~o~og o o~o~o~o 0o0o0o d 0 0 ~ ~-1 * d 0 c~O H H 0 o o o o o~ o~ o 0 offi !61 o~ 0 o~ 0 > o on:: oE~ o 0 cq rtl 161 1 o o~ o~ o 0 o p 0 o~ o~ o~ mrJ o~ u~rJ o~ 0 0 0 ~nH © © 161 I 0 [I2 , ~H 0 ~ 0 o~ 0 © I-4 c~ f.z.1 oD-, cD c~ 0 H 0~1 o © o cq 0 © 0 © 161 Port of the Islands Community Improvement District Balance Per Bank Statement Add: Transfers/Deposits in Transit Less: Outstanding Checks Balance Per Bank Beginning Bank Balance Per Books Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Adjustments Balance Per Books Month Ending Aug-02 $65,882.24 ($9,225.97) $56,656.27 $125,016.58 $11.15 ($68,369.30) $15.79 ($117.95) $56,656.27 GF Check # 63O 686 731 739 741 742 743 744 745 Outstanding Checks Amount Check # $1,503.05 $100.00 VOID $100.00 $104.59 $233.67 $4,950.00 $1,248.08 $986.58 Amount Por Islands Community Improvement District Month Ending Aug-02 Balance Per Bank Statement Add: Transfers/Deposits in Transit Less: Outstanding Checks Balance Per Bank $61,899.22 $o.oo ($11.,133.91 $50,765.31 $40,065.46 $37,089.02 ($6,677.08 ($19,591..92 $8.49 ($128.66) $50,765.31 Beg4m2ng Bank Balance Per Books Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Adjustments Balance Per Books Outstanding Checks Check # Amount Check # 1625 $50.00 1666 1638 $43.71 1667 1640 $551.82 50171 1651 $242.23 1654 void 1660 $100.00 1662 $68.88 1663 $104.60 1664 $233.68 1665 $4,950.00 ws Amount $2,083.28 $986.59 $1,719.12 161 1 MEMORANDUM Misc. Correspondence Agenda Date Agenda Item # TO: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners FROM: Derek Johnssen, General Accounting Manager Clerk of the Circuit Court/Finance Department DATE: RE: October 31,2002 Miscellaneous Correspondence - BCC Agenda Please place the following items on the next available BCC agenda and call me at extension 8350 with the date and Miscellaneous Correspondence agenda item number. NAPLI=S HI::RITA~E COMMUNITY DI=Vl--_LEiPMI::NT DISTRICT 1. Pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapters 189 and 190, Naples Heritage Community Development District, has submitted the following: (a) (b) (c) Minutes of Meeting held August 12, 2002 Adopted Budget FY 2003 Unaudited Financial Statement 7/31/02 Thank you :\special\special Naples Heritage Community Development District 10300 NW llth Manor, Coral Springs, Florida 33071 Tel. (954) 753-0380 · Fax (954) 755-6701 DATE: October 21, 2002 Mr. Derrick Johnssen C! JERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT Finance Department 2671 Airport Road, Court Plaza III Post Office Box 413016 Naples, Florida 34112-3016 Mr. Jim Mudd COLLIER COUNTY MANAGER Governmental Center 3301 East Tamiami Trail Administrative Building Naples, Florida 34112 Bruce Anderson, Esq. YOUNG, VAN ASSENDERP, ANDERSON, P~A. 801 Laurel Oak Drive Ste 300 Naples, Florida 34108 VARNADOE, & GRAU & COMPANY, P.A. 2700 North Military Trail Suite 350 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 FROM:' James P. Ward, District Manager RE: Au_gust 12, 2002 Meetirm Enclosed for your records is a copy of the minutes of the above meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Naples Community Development District which are to be kept on file for public access. JPW/tj Encl: MINUTES OF.MEETING ~ NAP!,ES HERITAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Naples Heritage Community Development District was held Monday, August 12, 2002 at 9:10 a.m. at the Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Clubhouse, 8150 Heritage Club Way, Naples, Florida. Present were: Peter J. Lombardi Peter Ramundo Michael Hueniken Gerald James Jack Spitz Chairman Vice Chairman Supervisor Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Also present were: James P. Ward Dan Cox District Manager District Attorney FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS Call to Order Mr. Lombardi called the meeting to order and called the roll. (via phone) (via phone) (via phone) SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS Approval of the Minutes of the May 13, 2002 Meeting Mr. Lombardi stated each Board member had received a copy of the minutes of the May 13, 2002 meeting and requested any additions, corrections or deletions. There not being any, IOn MOTION by Mr. James seconded by Mr. Ramundo[[ with all in favor the minutes of the May 13, 2002 were[[ approved. TIHRD ORDER OF BUSINESS Public Hearing to Consider the Adoption of the Budget for Fiscal Year 2003 and Levy of Non Ad Valorem Assessments Mr. Lombardi opened the public hearing. August 12, 2002 Naples Heritage C.D.D. Mr. Spitz asked do we have an engagement letter with the auditors that spell out their rates and what they are going to do? 161 Mr. Ward responded yes. Mr. Spitz asked the accounting shows $667 per month; if we are paying $100 per hour it comes out to six hours and forty minutes per month, is that what it takes to do this? It looks like the management fee, accounting, telephone, postage, rentals and printing are all on one check; does this seem a little high to you? Mr. Ward responded I lowered our management fee from $35,000 per year to $15,000, which is intended to account for the time we have in the project including accounting and other fees we charge. Most of the postage, telephone, printing and binding charges is passed on directly. Mr. Spitz stated it just seems six hours and forty minutes for accounting per month is a lot for the small amount of accounting we have. Mr. Ward stated it probably takes more time than that to get it to a governmental standard, especially when you deal with audit requirements. Mr. S~itz stated I see in contingency we had plenty of money in the bank last year with the telephone being the only account going over budget by $200; overall the budget was under by $6,500. I do not see why we need any money in contingency this year. On the Supervisors fee, there were only six meetings, which amounts to $6,000 and we budgeted for $8,000. Mr. James asked what does the insurance cover that we have budgeted? Mr. Ward responded it covers general liability, property and director's and officer's liability. Mr. James asked ! understand the director's liability, but what is the CDD responsible for insuring? Mr. Ward responded the general liability covers issues that result from just having a District in place and any accidents that may occur. The property insurance is relatively minimal because it is covered under the HOA insurance. Mr. James asked did that type of insurance go up 17%? Mr. Ward responded post September 114 insurance for governmental agencies across the country did, but specifically what we are seeing in Florida is a dramatic increase in the insurance premiums because of two carriers pulling out this year. The Florida League is no longer writing policies for any governmental agency in the state and premiums have changed dramatically. Mr. Lombardi asked do we have a definite bid on that amount? Mr. Ward responded not yet. 2 August 12, 2002 Naples Heritage C.D.D. Mr. Lombardi asked how soon could you get a bid on it? 161 Mr. Ward responded unfortunately the carriers have not been giving us bids, I will not know until September of this year. Mr. Ramundo stated I am also questioning the accounting bill, for the number of transactions that we have during the course of the year it seems high. Mr. Ward stated I adjusted the management fee to deal with that issue. The combined fees are intended to provide you with the level of service that you need. Frankly, $8,000 is the minimum charged to do one general fund. Actually, we charge about $8,000 for each fund that we normally do. Our minimum fee for management services is generally $35,000, which I reduced to $15,000 thinking the combined fee with the accountant will be sufficient for next year. Mr. Lombardi asked the audit went from $5,000 to $5,500; is that a contracted advance amount? Mr. Ward responded that is a fixed fee and we will be getting those bids in the coming month. Mr. Lombardi asked could it come in for less? Mr. Ward responded it could, but I doubt it. We get a discount from a lot of the auditor's we work with because they do a lot of CDD work and that is about the minimum fee you will see. Mr. Lombardi stated after reviewing this year's audit it seems like there will be less work than the previous year because of the bond fund they had to audit. Now that they do not have that, I assume it would stay the same or go down. Mr. Ward stated we will get the numbers, but just the liability portion of what the auditor's are picking up these days almost dictates a minimum fee of $4,500 to $5,500 per year. Mr. Lombardi asked do they submit their reports to a governmental agency? Mr. Ward responded they are submitted to the District and the District provides them to the Department of Community Affairs and the Auditor General's office as a requirement of law. Mr. Spitz asked does the engagement letter tell us what they are going to do for so much per hour and what they are going to prepare for those hours? Mr. Ward stated an audit for a governmental agency is dictated by law, we get an engagement letter that requires them, for a fixed fee, to provide audited financial statements of the District in accordance with generally accepted accounting principle, rules of the Auditor General, rules of the Department of 3 August 12, 2002 Naples Heritage C.D.D. rJis a1 Banking and Finance and bond compliance and laws of the State itself., standard they all must meet just by providing the audit letter itself. I do not ask them to provide us hourly rates because I want them to do this on a fixed fee basis. They provide a fixed fee to perform the audit for the District in accordance with all the governmental laws, rules and regulations that are required in order to give you an audit with an unqualified opinion attached thereto. liOnMOTION by Mr. Ramundo seconded by Mrll ]Hueniken with all in favor the public hearing wa~ ]closed. On MOTION by Mr. James seconded by Mr. Spitz witl~l all in favor Resolution 2002-4 approving the udgo oll I fiscal year 2003 was adopted. On MOTION by Mr. Ramundo seconded by Mr. Spitz]l ]]with all in favor Resolution 2002-5 levying ][maintenance assessment for fiscal year 2003 w asll Iladopted. FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Staff Reports A o Attorney Mr. Cox stated there is a small easement on District property that needs to be dedicated to the County that I will work on with U.S. Home over the next few weeks to line everything up and will report back to the Board at the next meeting for direction on how to proceed. Mr. Lombardi asked what would that involve? Mr. Cox responded by the development order there is a requirement to dedicate a 100' x 100' easement and the County asked for a 200' x 200' section wanting four times the land requirement, but have not indicated what they are willing to do in return. Once we get more information from the County and the Water Management District as to what they are going to require we will let you know what will be required of the District, what those costs will be and who we can recover them from. Mr. Ramundo asked is that piece of property any specific parcel or location within Naples Heritage? Mr. Cox responded it was generalized, but it will be close to the Davis Road right-of-way in the northwest quadrant of the property. 4 August 12, 2002 Naples Heritage C.D.D. Mr. Lombardi asked is that currently part of the reserve area? 16[ Mr. Cox responded I believe it may be. Mr. Lombardi asked how could they take it out of the reserve area? Mr. Cox responded that is what we are working on. Mr. Lombardi stated if we were to ask to take something out of the reserve area we would have to make adjustments somewhere else. Now if the County wants to take it out are they going to have to make an adjustment as well? Mr. Cox responded they would have to do an adjustment as well, whether it means buying an off-site credit or what. Mr. Lombardi asked is it something we can negotiate with them? Mr. Cox responded that is what I will be doing with them over the coming months. Mr. Lombardi asked then nothing final would be done until it comes back to the Board? Mr. Cox responded the Board would have to ultimately approve all of the terms and conditions of the conveyance with the County. Mr. Lombardi asked if they take a 100' x 100' segment, would they need an easement to get back and forth through that area? Mr. Cox responded they already have it. Mr. Ward stated for example on your existing roads there are easements that already exist and they are allowed to use them; if it abuts a public road they will not need the easement. Mr. Lombardi asked why do they need that piece of land? Mr. Cox responded it is for a lif~ station for the sewage treatment facility's expansion into this area. Mr. Lombardi stated then we have to make sure it is not close to any properties. Mr. Cox stated the lift stations do not have any odors, it is only during construction that it would be an inconvenience to the property owners close by. Mr. Lombardi stated we also would not want it close to the entrance on Davis Boulevard. Mr. Cox stated we would definitely keep that point in mind in identifying a place for the County to look at. Mr. Spitz asked is that the same piece of property that has not been deeded over to the CDD yet? 5 August 12, 2002 Naples Heritag~ C~,¥. Mr. Cox responded no, it is on the opposite side; they are looking in the northwest corner. Mr. Lombardi stated this issue is with the attorney to work out and wiI1 be discussed with us later. There not being any, the next item followed. C. M~nager i. Financial Statements There not being any comments, the next item followed. ii. Meeting Dates for Fiscal Year 2003 Mr. Lombardi stated the meeting dates for the year are usually set in advance to be able to publish notice in an appropriate manner. These dates can be changed as long as we give sufficient notice. Are there any comments or changes to the dates listed? Hearing none, the dates for the annual meetings are accepted as follows: October 14, 2002, January 13, March 10, May 12, June 9, and July 14, 2003. FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Supervisors Requests and Audience Comments Mr. Lombardi stated I have a letter addressed to the Board dated May 13, 2002 from Mr. Hueniken in regards meetings that reads as follows: Dear Board Members: The documentation to to the plantings talked about at previous transfer the South Florida Water Management District Permit from Construction Phase to Operation Phase has been turned into the Water Management District for review. Before SFWMD can transfer the permit all Limiting and Special Conditions of the permit have to be met. At this time there are two outstanding issues. 1. A Conservation Easement has to be recorded on Tract B; U.S. Home's Attorney Steve Kushner will be submitting the easement to the WMD for approval within the next week to ten days. After the WMD approves the easement, it will then be recorded with Collier County. At that time the land that the Conservation Easement encompasses will be deeded to Naples Heritage CDD. 6 August 12, 2002 Naples Heritage C.D.D. 2. The Permit required the planting of 2.4 acres of Littoral Pla~s,~] U.S. Home will be planting 1,928 trees and 3,853 herbaceous plants divided between Lakes 6,8,9,11,12,13 and 14. The trees will consist of Laurel Oaks, Maple, Bay, Cypress and Willow depending on availability. Herbaceous plants will be composed of Dahoon Holly, Wax Myrtle, Spartina, Dlechnum, Boston fern, Bacopa, Maidencan, Sagittaria, Pontederia, Thalia, and Water lily again depending on availability. The Littoral Planting Contract will require a five-year 80% survival guarantee. When the two permit issues are resolved, SFWMD should transfer the Environmental Resource Permit from the Construction Phase to Operation Phase. If you remember we talked about this in great detail at previous meetings and asked Mr. Hueniken to get a statement to us from U.S. Home regarding the planting of these trees and plants requesting in writing that they will be responsible for their survival rate for a five year period, which is what this letter is. I talked to the Chairman of the Green's Committee, who has already talked to the U.S. Home representative, to determine where these trees will be planted. Before they are planted we requested they coordinate it with the Green's Committee to ensure these trees will not be in the middle of fairways or too close to impede play. Consequently, they have met with the Green's Committee and are working on that plan now. I thought we already had title to all of the reserve areas. Mr. Hueniken stated we are missing Tract B. When we did our estimates Tract B was never turned over, it remained in U.S. Home's name. The District brought that to our attention and we are now in the process of writing the easement and have submitted it to the District for their approval. Mr. Lombardi stated then that section is not covered by the agreement with the CDD and Naples Heritage management Board. Mr. Hueniken stated technically it is still in U.S. Home's name. Mr. Lombardi asked when that is done do we also have to ask them to take this section as well? Mr. Cox responded it would be transferred or deeded over to the District. Mr. Lombardi stated by agreement they will maintain it then. Mr. Cox stated yes, the CDD will. 1 7 August 12, 2002 Naples H~i~g~C.D.~ .i Mr. Ward stated we have an agreement with the HOA for the maintenance of the wetland areas and so forth. Mr. Lombardi stated consequently we would have to include that segment in the agreement. Mr. Cox stated it is already included and they have been doing the maintenance on it. It is just a technicality that has been overlooked and was never deeded from U.S. Home to the District. Mr. Lombardi asked do we need another statement or not. Mr. Ward responded I do not think we do. Mr. Cox stated we have been working with the Green's Committee, we have the bid out, and it looks like Florida Environmental is the low bid for the tree and littoral plantings. We also looked at the irrigation issue with S&S, the golf management company for Naples Heritage, and they feel all these areas are already covered by the golf course irrigation. We will confirm that and then go ahead and do the plantings. Mr. Ramundo asked could you send a copy of that letter to the Supervisors? Mr. Ward responded it would be in the minutes as read. SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment Mr. Lombardi stated the next meeting will be October 14, 2002. IHueniken with all in favor the meeting adjourned at ]a.m. Ja~y~s P.-~Vard Secretary Chairman 8 Monday August 12, 2002 9:00 A.M. 1. 2. 3. AGENDA NAPLES HERITAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Clubhouse 8150 Heritage Club Way Naples, Florida Roll Call Approval of the Minutes of the May 13, 2002 Meeting Public Hearing to Consider the Adoption of the Budget for Fiscal Year 2003 and Levy of Non Ad Valorem Assessments 4. Staff Reports A. Attorney B. Engineer C. Manager i. Financial Statements ii. Meeting Dates for Fiscal Year 2003 5. Supervisors Requests and Audience Comments 6. Adjournment NOTE TO A!,I, MEE~G ATTENDEES: Please identify yourself each time you speak to facilitate transcription of meeting minute~ Thank you for your assistance. NapLes DaiLy News NapLes, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication NapLes Daily News NAPLES HERITAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTR~CT 210 N UNIVERSITY DR #?02 CORAL SPRINGS FL 33071 REFERENCE: 052512 58495?46 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA State of FLorida County of CoLLier Before the undersigned authority, personaLLy appeared B. Laeb, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the NapCes OaiLy News, a daily newspaper published at NapLes, in CoLLier County, FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said neuspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said NapLes DaiLy Neus is a newspaper published at NapLes, in said CoLLier County, FLorida, and that the sa~d newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said CoLLier County, FLorida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in NapLes, in said CoLLier County, FLorida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the f~rst publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor proeised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pubL~ction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 07/23 07/30 AD SPACE: 98.000 INCH FILED ON: 07/30/02 PersonaLLy known by me , L~rYJ~,,~<2)/TL~ p~ Donna Chesney '~-",~ .-,, < My Commission DD056336 · Expires September 11, 2005 ~en ore ~ mare auper. ~'1SO¢S W~I ~ by ~on ~ ~ ~ , ~m~n~ Any: P~On re~ul~lng I ~lal ~~l Im~lre~ ~[d: ~n:l ~ ~ DI~ ~e mi ~ve ~ ~s ~1 ~ ~e m~. ~Ea~ ~ ~ ~1 tls ~ ~ ~1 prOc~n~ and ~ m~ ~ m:e~ { 'e ve~m ~d~ cludine ~e ~sflm~y { RESOLUTION 2002-4 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL BUDGET OF THE NAPLES HERITAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 Whereas, the District Manager has heretofore prepared and submitted to the Board, for approval, the District's proposed General Fund Budget for the ensuing fiscal year; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held on this 12th day of August, 2002, at which members of the general public were accorded the opportunity to speak prior to the adoption of the final budget; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE NAPLES HERITAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; 1. The General Fund Budget heretofore submitted to and approved by the Board is hereby adopted as the final General Fund Budget of the District for Fiscal Year 2003. 2. A verified copy of said final General Fund Budget shall be attached as an exhibit to this Resolution in the District's "Official Record of Proceedings". Adopted this 12th day of August, 2002. Peter J. L(f-~bardi Chairman J~es P. Ward Secretary Naples Heritage COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT DISTINCT General Fund Budget Fiscal Year 2003 Adopted- August 2002 Naples Heritage 161 Community Development District General Fund Budaet for Fiscal Year 2003 Final Adopted Amounts Received or Expended Budget Year to Date Projected FY 2002 3/31/02 to 9/30/02 Total Revenues: Irrigation Fees Interest Income Surplus Assessment Levy Total Revenues: Expenditures: Professional and Administration Fees: Board of Supervisor's Fees Engineering Legal Audit Manager Accounting Telephone Postage Printing and Binding Legal Advertising Office Supplies Annual District Filing Fee Rentals and Leases Insurance Contingencies Total Profe~ional & Admin Fee., Other Fees and Charges: Tax Collector Property Appraiser Revenue Reserve Total Other Fees & Charges Total Appropriations Net Income From Operations Fund Balance Audited 9/30/01 Projected Fund Balance 9/30102 $0.00 $3,200.00 $78,112.00 $81,312.00 $6,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,ooo,oo $5,500.00 $35,0OO.OO $8,000.00 $5OO.OO $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $6OO.O0 $175.00 $2,400.00 $3,000.00 $500.00 $75,675.00 $788.00 $1,594.00 $3,255.00 $5,637.00 $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $1,277.23 $1,277.23 $2,554.46 $75,862.37 $2,249.63 $78,112.00 $77,139.60 $3,526.86 $2,200.00 $3,800.00 $6,000.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $797.46 $2,000.00 $2,797.46 $%ooo,oo $o.oo $5,ooo.oo $14,583.35 $20,416.65 $35,000.00 $3,333.34 $4,666.66 $8,000.00 $354.53 $350.00 $704.53 $429.54 $570.46 $1,000.00 $422.20 $500.00 $922.20 $499.68 $500.00 $999.68 $o.oo $500.00 $500.00 $175.00 $0.00 $175.00 $1,000.00 $1,400.00 $2,400.00 $2,892.00 $0.00 $2,892.00 $o.oo $500.00 $500.00 $31,687.10 $37,703.77 $69,390.87 $0.00 $788.00 $788.00 $1,744.96 $0.00 $1,744.96 $0.00 $3,255.00 $3,255.00 $1,744.96 $4,043.00 $5,787.96 $81,312.00 $33,432.06 $41,746.77 $75,178.83 $0.00 $43r707.54 ($38r219.91) $5,487.63 $166,677.00 $172,164.63 Adopted Budget FY2003 $0.00 $2,500.00 $56,264.00 $58,764.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,ooo.oo $5,500.00 $15,000.00 $8,000.00 $750.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $2,4O0.00 $6,500.00 $500.00 $54,825.00 $1,125.00 $563.00 $2,251.00 $3,939.00 $58,764.00 $o.o0 Naples Heritage Community Development District General Fund 001 Appropriation Comparison / Detail Analysis Item Administrative Board of Supervisor's Fees Engineering Legal Audit Manager Accounting Telephone Postage Printing and Binding Legal Advertising Office Supplies Annual District Filing Fee Rentals ~nd Leases Insurance Contingencies Department Totals: Total Costs Fiscal Year Percentage 2002 2003 Change $6,000 $8,000 33% $5,000 $2,500 -50% $5,000 $2,000 -60% $5,500 $5,500 0% $35,000 $15,000 -57% $8,000 $8,000 0% $SO0 $750 50% $1,ooo $1,ooo 0% $1,500 $1,000 -33% $1,500 $1,000 -33% $600 $500 -17% $175 $175 0% $2,400 $2,400 0% $3,000 $6,500 117% $5oo $500 0% $75,675 $54,825 -28°/o Other Fees and Charges Tax Collector Property. Appraiser Revenue Reserve Department Totals: Department Totals $788 $1,125 43% $1,594 $563 -65% $3,255 $2,251 -31% $5,637 $3,939 -30°/o $81,312 $58,764 -28% $0 $0 0% $81,31.2 $58,764 -28o/o Revenue Reserves Total Appropriations: 2 Naples Heritage Community Development District Budget- General Fund 001 Fiscal Year 2003 Revenue: Interest Income Assessment Levy Total Revenue: $2,500 $56,264 $58,764 Appropriations: Professional Fees: Board of Supervisor's Fees Engineering Legal Audit Manager Administrative Fees: Accounting Telephone Postage Printing and Binding Legal Advertising Office Supplies Annual District Filing Fee Rentals and Leases Insurance Contingencies Other Fees & Charges: Tax Collector Property Appraiser Revenue Reserve Subtotal: Subtotal: $8,000 $2,500 $2,000 $5,soo $15,000 $33,000 $8,000 $750 $i,ooo $i,ooo $i,ooo $soo $i75 $2,400 $6,500 $soo $21,825 $1,125 $563 $2,251 Subtotal: $3,939 Total Appropriations: $58,764 Assessable Units Assessment Per Unit - FY 2002 FY 2003 799 799 $97.76 [ $70.42 RESOLUTION 2002-5 A RESOLUTION LEVYING A MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE NAPLES HERITAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the Naples Heritage Community Development District finds that the assessment for operation and maintenance of the District during 2003 will amount to $56,264; and it is hereby determined that said maintenance is required within the District; WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the Naples Heritage Community Development District finds that the assessment for debt service of the District during 2003 will amount to $0; and it is hereby determined that no debt service is required for the District; WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the Naples Heritage Community Development District finds based upon the reports of the District Manager and District Engineer, that maintenance of the Districtls systems and facilities provides peculiar and special benefits to the parcels set forth in the attached Exhibit "A", and that the amounts of the maintenance non-ad valorem assessments are fairly and reasonably apportioned between benefited parcels in proportion to the benefits received by each parcel; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE NAPLES HERITAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; 1. That a maintenance assessment in the total sum amount of $56,264 be and the same is hereby levied upon each tract or parcel of land within the Naples Heritage Community Development District. 2. That the collection and enforcement of the aforesaid assessment shall be at the same time and in like manner as Collier County taxes. All assessments shall be subject to the same discounts as Collier County taxes. 3. That the said maintenance assessment levy and the lists of lands included in the District to be levied upon are hereby certified to the Collier County Property Appraiser on Exhibit "AI' to be extended on the County Tax Roll and shall be collected by the Collier County Tax Collector in the same manner and time as Collier County taxes. The proceeds therefrom shall be paid to the Naples Heritage Community Development District. 1 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this Resolution be transmitted to the proper public officials so that its purpose and effect may be carried out in accordance with the law. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of August, 2002, by the Board of Supervisors of the Naples Heritage Community Development District, Collier County, Florida. Jes~ncreS P. Ward Chairman ggg 888 8gg 7 161 gg8 z i oz o Z oz oz ~ o z~ o z o z oz z 888 z 888 z 800 zoo z z z z oo 008 °88 888 888 z d~O z dd' z z O000001000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000/0 oooooo oooooo oooooo oooooo oooooo qqqqq~qqqqqqlQ°°°°° dddddd dd~dd6 6~dddd~dddddd'~6ddd ooooo oooooofodd~o~ ~z LLI Ill I..U~- o o o o o %o.°,_ 'dt o o o o o o o o o n~wz ~fOm -r~ zo o o ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 I-- Z ~-,,, mil- ~o~. 888 oo o o oo o°88 o 8.oo. Z Z o ~°° z oo88 Z o~dd z 888 Z d~ OOOOOO OOOO O OOOOO OOOOOO OOOO oooooo oooo~o ooooo~ oooooo oooo dddddd'dddddd'dddddd'dddddd'dddd Z Z ZOZO o o o o o. o I- Z D o ~_g o o o o o o O 'rD ~o ~ ~o '1- 0 m 0 o o oo o o *~ LU 0 o o o 888 o ~ z ~ o°8 o o o o o o o m I-- 80°8 o ~o~o~ Z ~ o Z o Z z 8o08 z ~oOoo 0~o o o o Z o Z D o 0 U.i~L z 888 o o g~ o ggg ooo. Z iii go°g o°gg z z I-- Z ~) 0 o g O O fl[ 16 o g o°o°o° o o© §8~ o g o°~g o o° g 0 0 CD 0 0 oo oOoO8 oOoO8 oOoO8 ~ o ~ o~ o ~ogg o ~ o Z Z Z Z i{ Z Z o Z o o o o Z ! o Z §§ OoOg z 8oO00 z oOgoO z 800o0 ZioOoOoO z ~ ~d z! 'dO z Z Z Z Z D D ~D {,,'oD O O ~ O 0 0 ~ .0 t'~!'''o 1o~ o~_ -m LU i-,,, <- ~3 <_~ zo zo zc.) , 0 zo 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ° ° °-- ° ° ° .~ o o ® o o.~ ~. o o~ 00 o o~ o o 00 ~0000 o ~ o o ~ o ~ o ~ o o o o o ~ o o o ~ o o o~ o o~ o~ 0 ~ OJ~ 0 ~ 0 _ ~ -- ~ - o ~ o o a o ~ ~ o i~ o a o oo. oo o~Lo oo 888 o 8 0°88 Z o~o~ z o 888 o 8 888 o 8 ~;~ ...... .,, ,,, o~ ooo ,o o o°88 Z Z Z Z z 888 z z ddd z 0 0 ooo~ ~m-o ~iz - o o zo~ 0 o°~_.~ _Oz~ ck-,,, -Zl-- j j ,= .o.~, CJOOnO '-. 0 ~ t- 888 ~oo oo ~ o o 888 o 0000 00000 00000 88oooo 800000 800000 ~dddd d'd ddd dd'd d d ddd W 8~ ~<z zO ~d~o O~ o8 d'd c~ c~ o 7 7 z 80o8 z ~dd 0 0 0 z 0 ~ ° 888 08 z ~ z ~ I- z 0 Lt. LtJn ...j r~ 888 o 8 888 0 0 0 0 0 0 C~ o o~'- oo oO o o ~0 :~ c5 0 0 0 ~ 0 z ~o~ o Z Z o z 8. oO.o©. :. z ~o~o z o 880© o 8 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~0 ~ {:5 Z oO. oO, o©, = o°.o?o? Z oO. oO.oo. = Z Z oogg z o Z oogg z c50c5 z o o o ooo Z Z z g§g Z ~ o Z Z o Z Z o 000000 000000 000000 O00000tO000000 00000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000I 000000 0 I-- Z~ 0 o 0 >- _1 0 0 0 ~0 ~0 O~ 0 O~ 0 0 r~ o o o o o o 0 0 iW ~m mu_mm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 Z Z §§§ z z LUn o oo Z Z Z Z Z Z O0 O0 000 000000 00000 00000 000000 ~dddd d'dddddd' 'ddd d d'dddd d d'd d ddd d dddd~d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 zo 0 0 0 ~,. 0 -r~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l- g_ ~g .J 0 0 0 0 z I-- z 0 T© 0 0 0 tO o ~, _J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 888 00008 o o ~; 7 z o ~o ~3 0 0 0 0 0 ~,D 0 0 .q. Z Z oO88 z dd~ Z ~ddddd'dd d O db d I- Z o LiJfl- W Z / o°88 o°88 Z ~ o 8 ~o .-JO3 ZtD z 00000 00000 00000 0 CO LLI ~o Z o ~ z o Z o o ~ 000 0 Z Z 0 ~ Z 0 ~ o ~ z z 000000 000 O0 o 888 Z Z n~ ZO o o o 888 2: Z 8008 z o o ~61 ol ~ ~ o ~ o~ooo o Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 888 z ooo z ~ z z ooo 8 8 888 7 z 8000© z c~ c~ c5 0°88 Z ~o~ 0 88o° Z oOoOoO z <5~5~ z 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 ~00000 I-- z 0 (.> 0 0 0 0 m ._l rtl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b,.. lO-- ~q 0 0 o o Z Z z 88~ z ~ 8ooo© ~ooooo ooooooi~ooooo qqqoq,qqqqqq oooo o o I0 z o o i o 0 0 0 o I o o 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 i 0 c~ c~ c~ o z 888 z o8~- [ ~ ~dd o · e. ~. ~. 7 Z 88o© z o~c~d z 888888 ~W o z o~dd Z z 888 z Z 8008 z ~dd z o o ~;~;~ o z Z 8008 z dc~e~ z o dcid 0 Z 8008 z ~ ~; o..; z o 00000 00000 0000 0 000000 000000 0 n,, k,- Z o r~ _J o o o o o o o o o o o°88888 oj~o o o o IZ~ Z Z o o o o o o o o o o 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 I",- o~x ~o m~o ~ ° n- l,.- Z D o o~ ~ t- Z D o (D ~ I..I.I o o o o o o ~ o ~ o o ~ o ~ o Z o CL Z 0 0 0 oo z ~ z 0 o zz~ 00o~ III.U-- oooo8 Z oo88 z ooo ooo oOoOg z o ~c~ Z o ~00000 000000 00000 000000 Z Z Z 88 z 888 z 888 00000 00000 000000~0 _J 0 0 0 0 8 ° 0 0 0 ~ -r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~o o ,z 0 C~ 0 0 ° o°8 Z oO8 z 00000 ~=q ._1__ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 oo 'E~ i,,.- ;~z--- ouJ ~ ZT 03 n _ ,,,0z m 7 (D Z oO. oO. 8. z °°~ ~>~ 888 o 888 z 888 Z Z 888 z q~qq ooooo o~ ~=o, 0 0 ~=0 0 ~- 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ LLI 8 0 Z 888 z o~ c5 c~ z o o o 00000 000000 00000 000000 I- z,~ ~,S>- :r zo>m o 0 0 ,..: 0 c5 0 ',cf' 0 0,,I 0 o 888 o o z 888 z c~dd 0 ~ o°.88 Z 000000 000000 0 0 0 qqq oo8 888 Z Z o z 888 Z Z Z Z 88~ 0°88 Z Z oo88 z Z o 88~ ~ ~ 80°.8 o 80°8 ~ o Z Z z 88 z z SS z 80°8 o~do z 8008 z ~c~d z o 00000 O000001000000 000000 oooooo ~ooooo oooooo ~ooooo oooooo oooooo ooooo oooooo dddddd ~ddddd'dddddd ~ddddd'dddddd dddddd'ddddddi o~o ~o~ 0 0 0 o~o =°~S o~ ~°~S =°~S 0 i O. S ® 8 0°8 o i o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 & Z °o. g8 0°88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t~ 0 0 0 0 z >- z 'tm 8gg 888 z dd~ z 0 0 0 0 o°88 Z oo88 z ggg z 88~ ~ ,~ 8g~ o ~ g,gg o Z oOgg z dd~ 0 Z ggoo z ~5~d z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° _JZ z~_~0 <--_. o o o o~ ~ ~ oo 0 t~- 0 0 ° LI.I >- ~m mm 88o°' Z Z ggg z oo88 z ~ Z 80°.8 oo~o Z §gg z g~ oogg 161 1 0 0 0 Z Z Z 888 z gag z gg z 000000 000000 000000 000000 O00000iO00000 000000 000000 000000 000000 O00000iO00000 d dddd d d d d d d d'dddd d d eeeeee z< z~ z< jz< ~z~ z~ 0~ JO~ 0~ u~ iu~ 0~0 0~0 0~0 0~0 iO~O 0~0 8~~°~ -~ 8o~ xo~ ~ o~ mZ lzo~m -- ~ o o o ~ o o i o f o o o o o i o t o ~ o o o ~ o oo~oo~oo ~oo¢~o .oo o o ~ o ~ o o o o ~ o ~f~ o o 0 0 i 0 0 ~ 0 o o /i~ o o i o o ~ o ~ o o ~ o ~ o o o o o io o ~ o o · '~ °o~ °o~ o o& -z~ ~× z~ ~ ~ ~~o~~ii~s~ ~os~*~..z ~ ~ ~z ~ 8oO~ ~ ~ o ~ 88~ z c5 c5 c5 Z 80°.8. Z 888 z ~c~ z z~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IJ.I LLI mm <~ ~q 8 ~ 888 o o o ~ o z ~ z o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o,,, ~: ___mm' Z(D>m 0 0 161 888 888 Z Z o 8~8 z 888 o Z ~o ~_g -' -5 0 I&l Om zo>m O O 0 0 Z goooo .~.~ o Z Z oooooo z o o ~ ~ o ~ Z Z Z Z z §~ z Z ~ Z o o ~00000 000000 00000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ow Il I~ 00 Z Z ~:o O ~-~ w O t4~ o~ 5 u.I ~__~z O O o O O o O 16 ~oooo ~;~ o Z o~oo z 1 ~c/ O 000000 00000 o~. =°~S I.IJ ° {2> ~-- Z~ w I-- ..J 03T--S .J[B~W <_.1__~, 0 o 0 ,~- c~ ,-J w o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 ggg o z z oOgg z Z~ o o 0 ooo 8gg gg ggg ggg gdo~ o gdO~ o 'gg o gdO~ o Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 888 z 8gg z 8gg z ooo z ooo ggg z~ ~66 z 66 ' z o z · ' ' 5z ~Sm USz ~<~z o o 6 o o ~ o ~ o ~ o o ~ o o o o ~ o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o 8 o 8 o 6 o ~ o o Z 7 o o z ggg z z ggg z 0 0 go°.oo. 000 0 Z Z g§g z ~d~ z o ~00000 000000 00000 000000 ~W® W o o m > I.-UJ ZO OZ Fo,_ ,~Z)Z~ Z 0 0 0 o~ ..rZ 161 o 1 Z Z ooo Z ooo Z o ~ z ~ z ~ddddd'oddddd UJ ZO>rn 0 ~ o o~o u?, oz6' ~->- Om mill -.r2o ~_.~ .--I __ ._1 .--I I--' 11,1o II. 12.00 c O O O O Z Z 88o0 z ~oc~ z cz, Z 0088 z dd~ z o 7 Z O O?~ Z O h- I.- Z 0 13- --I 0 O O O O O O O O O O (.ID I--- Z 0 (D L1 --I 0 O II ~l[ o~ llILLl n,-' l.- Z D 0 LL .-J O o ~ o Z Z Z Z o o z 888 z Z d~ Z 8 LL --3 0 I-- Z D 0 o LL 0 'l-rD ~o~g o Z Z ooo w ~ ~ Z~ ~ ~ ~ ow ~ zz 5 j~ ~ ~'z~< Oo -IH o Z Z 888 z o o o o Z Z ggg z cSdc5 Z n~ I-- Z "3 0 LL --I 0 m c5 / ooo0 z z 888 Z ~o~o~ z ~ 0 8o°.8 Z 888 z ~cSd z o ~00000 000000 000000 00000~ 00000 000000 000000 00000 z 0 LL _J 0 0 00 0 C~ 0 0 0 o'J <2> m r5 ,-~ {2> C~ n, I-- Z 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CID cq II mu_ ~q 8ooo° ~ o Z Z db 0 88o° ~o~ o Z Z 8oO8 z o 161, 1 ~o~ ~o~ o~ o ~ o ~.. o z ~ o ~ o Z ~ o Z 8~§ z 88 z 000000000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 dddddd dddddd'dddddd I- z 0 Ill --I i' 0 0 0 0 0 0 n~ z 0 0 c~ LL -.4 0 U.I ._l_l ~LU 0 m c~ ,--: 0 0 0 0 0 0 ',ct- 0 LU~OU ~0 zo~ o 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ILl TO O0 ~ddddd 2~ O O C~ O O Z Z 000000 000000 o o 0 Z Z 888 z Ow ~T U_I-- ~u_ mu.-O o o~ ,,,~z -JIB Z Z Z Z o o o 7 7 7 7 z 888 z OOZy 0 0 0 0 50,6` ~ ~ ~ 0 0 o 0 0 z z T 0 ~q 0 0 o o 0 000 0 7 7 7 Z 0 0 z 888 z z OdO z o o ~00000 000000 00000 000000 oZ~- ~¥>- "i- .< 7o> 0 cid ~0 ~q o°~ ~ 7 Z OmO o81.--.--I o~ o Z Z ggoo z o~ o~ o~ z 0 0 0 0 0 Z oooog z °°~ ~ ~ 7 Z goOoO z c5 c5 ¢5 Z o°~. ~ Z Z oOoOoo z z o o° o C, U.I w~z mil-0') c> ° o g Z oOoOoO z ~ z o >3 ~ <zw ~ o Z ~c~c5 z Z oo§oo z ~00000 000000 000000 00000 000000 000000 ::D Z (.9 o.~ oo:--, oo~ nGo zoo> zo~ ,CO 0 z z c~ ~ ~..>. 7 U.I w~ 0 ',r-- 0 0 C~ 8'o°o0 °°°'°°~ o o Z o Z oooooo zo°'='o z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z oooooo z §§oo go°§ O~ ddd 0 z §§~ z z dd~ z ~00000 000000 00000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~1 I-' _1 ~,~>- 0 0 0 0 (iD ~0 Z Z oooooo z 16 ~o~o~ o Z Z g§oo z ~c5 Z o Z 00000 000000 000000 00000 000000 000000 w~z o~z -l-r--l_ c> 0 0 0 o °o 0 0 o zn- ~©.J ~q h- 0 0 0 0 o zo> {2* 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0°88 Z 88o© z ~S~S z o 0 0 0 0 oOSoO o~ ~ o~ o o ooo Z Z Z Z z 888 z z ~d~ z 800000 080088 0 0 0 0 :> oo ,,,, 0 0 0 0 icl:) o ~6 00 LI_ (,.) I'-- ~' oo~ o ',el' oe~ 0 0 c5 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ o 0 o 0 8oO8 Z oOoO8 z o o o 888 o Z 88~ 8.88 888 o ~8 o Z Z Z Z o o z oOSoO z z 8~ z o o 88880 8oooooo oooooo 008000 0 0 0 o c~ o. ~zG o~ Lu~Z O-- 0 0 0 8~ oo 0 0 0 14} 0 0 0 -- ~z u-ow n Om Z II~ 00 88- 0 0 0 0 o~ 8 o ~ 0 0 0 ~0 8 · ~0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 88oO z ~c~c~ z o ~d~ 0 0 0 0 0 Z goO. o? LU ujn CO ,~ ..J _ c~c~ 0 c~ Z Z g. gg. ggg z Z goOg z ~ c5 <:5 z 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 oo~ oo~ o~ OJ --0~ O~ O> zo> 0 0 0 o o o ~gg~gg[~gg~goo® o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o o ~ o o goOoo Z Z oOoOoo z z o ~ddddd ~c~c~ 0 ' Z ggoo z oe~c~d z 1_61 ggg 7 Z ggg z (5 (:5 d z ddddd'dddddd 0 0 0 888 o~ o z Z o Z Z o 888 z o o o o o 88,~ ddd o o o~'~ o~ o o z ~ z 0 O0 OO00 808800 000088 ~Z0 0,- o _8 Z~> o o o 88~ ~ ~ ~d~ Od o z o~dd Z 88~- o Z ddo~ z 1_61 88~- ~ ~ 88~ o o~ o~ o~ o z z o o o z 008 ddo~ z 1 z 888 z 888o8 8oo8oo oooooo ooooo 'ddddd'6ddddd'dddddd dddodI o (.o o o o c~ o o o o o o !to u'~ -ltl o o o o o o o~ t z __. ~ w, t z ... w ~_10~o ~_-~ °° 8o°8 oo o 888 Z ~c5c~ z o°.8.8 o oo 8o°8 0 0 O0 0 Z Z Z Z 0 0 z 8oo8 z z c~c~d z ~00000 000000 000000 00000 000000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z OZ 888 888 o o ~00000 000000 00000 000000 ZO> 0 0 ~ 0z 0{~~ DlZo 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 88o° 88o° ~00000 000000 00000 000000 ~w {oo~ ~Z~ O~Om ~zo T {:2> o -r-m ~q o o z oO88 z z o~ o~ o~ z Z oo~ 7 888 o Z 8.8.8 z dddddd'ddddd~ o~S Z O-J O> fao. 888 Z o o Z dddddd ,=6~, ZO> 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 0 ° Z ~dd Z 88~ ~- Z 888 z c~c~ Z 00808 880800 8m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 mm ~o~ 888 Z 888 z ,~;~ z 161 88~ 888 888 88~ 888 ~ 1 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~:DZ ~0 CD 0 i- :r~< 0 0 0 O~ 0 0 ~2o oz ~q 8 m 002 ~Z ZO> oo888 ooooo8 oooooo 0°.88 Z Z o°gg ~ o Z Z oOgg z ,~,~ z oe~cSd 0 Z Z ggoo z ~.~d z ggg ggg Z Z ggoo z ~ z ~ ~oo ~ o Z Z Z Z z g§§ z z ~ z 8o0. o© o ggg ggg o Z goOo© z Z ~D,-- 0 0 0 0 0 LUiw Z >- ~;m _ tO~z w < ~ ~Z~ 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 I-- Z g o o<~ U_ Z~- 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 ~" -J (D LL~LUI~ WZ Z UJ~ --~ UJ ~q ~ © O> zo> ~ooOOOooooo ~ooOOOooooo oooOOOoooooo ~~~'~0~°°°°°°°°°° oooooo°°°°°°I°°°°°°oooooo0~~ ~d~O~°°°°°°°°°° Z goo§ z §go° ggoo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C~ CD, 0 1 ~-0n 03 gg~ ~ o ogggo 0 0 g g 0 0 0 0 0 o° .L~- Z o Z 0 0 0 ~ fi 0 · ~'Jz 0 .JlO~ u-j-~z 0 0 ggg o Z ggg z go.,ig o z ggg c5 c5 c5 o Z LLI n-~ OZ 0 0 0 ° o°88 z Z 8008 z ~ Z Z 0088 z d ,::5 ~ z z 0088 z (:5 ~ (:5 z Z 0o88 z ~00000 000000 000000 000000 000000 00000 000000 000000 000000 000000 0 0 II q~ Wo ~ ° o o o o o o W 5~ 07 m~ o o o o ~ ~ o o o ~0 o o o o 8 8 W 5~, o o oo o o ILl c~ oo o o o oo o o z z 88 z 888 z ~ z ~ z 'ddddd'dddddd 0 o° ~ o ILl o o o o o o o °~ oz Z o 80o8 z o~d~OdO o°88 Z 8800 z 88~ 888 Z 888 Z 8~8 z 000000 000 O0 O0 O0 O O '~' W Zr~ 0 888 Z 888 z ~dd Z o o 888 888 ~ o ~ o Z Z Z Z 888 z 8~8 z o LLI 0 LLI Z 8 8 ~.1 II''~ C~ O O 8 ~ W T 8 161 Z 888 z ~,~ c:5 ~5 Z 1 88~ ~ 888 888 Z 0 0 888 Z 888 Z ~c:¢d z Z 888 z ddd z o ooooo ~8 888888 W W ~, ° o 0 0 o 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 888 o c~dd Z Z o z 888 o Z o 00000 000000 0 C> 000 000000 ~,,~d d 0 d d'd d d d 0 d o o o 888 888 888 o~o~ o ,~o~ o o~ o Z Z Z Z Z Z o o o z z ~ '~ o = ~ ~ o o~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ddddd'dddddd~dddddd 0 0 0 ~ om o o ~ ~ 8 8~ ~ 8 8~ ~ o o ~ o ~ o ~ o 00 ~ 0 0 O~ ~ o ~ 0 0 0 Z goo§ z o .~,~.~ o Z Z oo8oo z Z o~dd z gg~ ~ ggg o Z Z gg~ z o Z Z o~dd z Z oo88 z ~(Sd z 00000 000000 000000 000000 000 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 n,'l- OZ n.o w0 i-~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ Z ~§~ z 88 z O0 000 0 oogooolo~§ LLI 0 0 0 0 0 0 oOg~ ~oo 0 00 (9 O9 ggg ¢ojo~ o Z Z oOoOoo z 000000 ~ooo o Z o~ <:5 (5 z 000 0 Z Z ggg z cSdc~ z o ~00000 000000 00000 O~ $/~o gg~ ggg Z oOgg z OOmaOOm Z oOoOg z cSd~ z g 0 0 0 ~0 w- 0 0 ~0 O0 T I&l 0 0 ~0 tl~ _1 m~ gg~ o~ ggg 161 1 gg~ gg~ o~ 7 ggg °Z °Z~ °Z ggg z g~g z gg z 0 o 0 0 0 ~0 ~0 C> Z ~ddd z o oo~ ~ Z Z 8oO8 z ddd z ~ddddd'dddddd 0 0 0 ~ 0 · q' . t ° Z 0088 z o~o~ z o 888 Z oo8~ z dd~ z o o°°~o°o ~ 0v- 0 0 888 oj~ o Z Z 880° z o ,qqQqq W 5~ 0 (..) 0 0 0 0 Z oo88 z c5c5~ o Z Z 888 z d~d z o ~00000 000000 00000 000000 ~dc~ 0 oO. 8~ 00.88 ddd 0 d z ggoo z dd~ Z o dd~d 0 d Z z 8oOoO z o~dc5 z o oO. oo. ~. z z 00.88 ~ ~o~o~ o o o 0°.88 z Z Z c5 c5 c5 Z ~dd z 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 00000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 0 ~~,~~ ooooo o~ Sg o~ oz ~z ~z~ o o o ~o o OQ ~Z ~Z Z Z ~z Z 0 0 0 0 ;0 0 o ~ ~ o o ~ o o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~ . . ~ . ~~ . .~ ~oo~ ~ 0 0 0 0 1 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 o 6 Oo~ o 6 oJ o o 6 o o Oo~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ · 0 0 0 o , ol~ o , ol ~ ~ o ~ o1~ o ~ ~ W ~; ° 0 ~ ddd 0 o ~d~ o z z z z Z ~dd Z o o ~ I~. 0 0 0 o. ,-- lin ~,,,= {2> Z ~.oo. oo z ~::~ o c~ Z Z ~§~ z 0 Z ~Z U~ io~0 0 0 8~ Z 0 0 0 o ZLIJ 01- I...-m o°88 ~o~ o Z Z oo88 z (,0z .LaZ~ I-'-~ c> ° .J ooo Z oo88 z o o°.88 7 Z oO. 88 z 888888 888888 o o 0 0 0 oo oo 0 0 0 ul UJ Z Z w0 0 0 o ~0 0 888 Z Z 888 z ~ z o 8o,~ ~ 8o°.8 Z Z 8oO8 z o ~00000 00000 000000 o o n- zO LLIZ o°.88 88o°' 7 Z Z 888 z 888 z 03z Uj::D o 0 0 ~0 oOoO~ ~ 0 0 0 ~0 0 0 0 0 0 oo 8 0 0 o 0 a~-~ O~ 0_--1 oo~ ~ oo o Z OOm~ Z 0 z Ox zo nO 0 0 Z Z o gg~ z gg. z o 0000 0 0 o. Z Z ggg z ddd z o ~00000 000000 00000 000000 0 0 {33 tO 0 W o_ ~z 0 O3 -J(~3 o,,, ~ _ ~o <~a~ z' o~ Z o 0 ~o g g Z oo8 z Z oogg z ggg z Z o~dd z Z ggg z ggg z ~00000 000000 000000 00000 000000 000000 0 0 0 n z 0 <~ 0 ILI.I 0 <~ 0 0 0 00 o Z n,'-r >- >- ~ o~ Z w0 I-< o 0 0 0 0°88 88~ ~ ~ Od 000 0 Z Z o 888 z ~ z 0 ~00000 000000 00000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 888 888 Z ooo ooo z ~ Z ~00000 000000 00000 0 oO~ I'--'~' 0 0 (,ID (ID ~ ° 0 g ° 8oO~'- o W 0 0 888 Z 8gg z 161 o°o°.~ ~ ~8~ Z oO88 z ~c~c5 z 8o°8 o~o~ Z oO. oooo z ggo~ z ~00000 000000 000000 00000 000000 000000 =~ i~ wo ~0 On n 0 0 0 g 0 0 >- 0 T mil- O0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 g o g [ ~q 0 0 ~D ~0 D <.~. 0 0 0 0 0 0 888 Z Z oO~oO z o~d z 880°' Z ¢5 ¢5 c5 Z (:3 888 Z Z dd d ddd'd dd dd d'd d d d dd 88~ 888 o o qqq o ~ o Z Z Z Z o Z ooo Z z d6~ z 888888 888 ~o~ o Z Z 8oo8 z ~o~o~ z o o o oo o, qo. 8o°8 z 8oO8 z ~ z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0 Z Z o Z 0 0 ggg Z 888 z 8.8.8 oo~o Z 888 z c5 c~ oe~ Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 D IJ.II- ~ o0--® w - NI- ~n~ Z w~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 0 Z ggg z o°.g8 ooo~ o°gg o°8g Z Z o z 8oO. oo. o 88o° 7 ggg z ~(5c5 z ~00000 000000 000000 000000 00000 000000 000000 000000 g z w~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 o g z =~ 0 0 <× ~0 © I..I. II3.. ° o 0 0 0 0 oo.~8 Z oo88 z dO0 z 88~ 0°88 OOo°OO 000000 O00OO0 O0 oooooo oooooo oo88oooo 0 0 0 0 0 ~OZ uj0 © ~o~ o ~ o°.88 888 Z 88~ 8oo~ 888 oooo§ z 0 0 CO ~0 CO CO W~t~ i-. U.I z-r U JO 161 ~ oooo~ o oooooo o ~ Z Z o z oooooo z 0oo o Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 ~0 CO tl.l _.l CO 898 Z Z ggg z ggog o gSoo g,gg o Z Z ~ c:; <5 z o oo. gg Z ggg z c~d¢5 Z o m W oo oo 0 0 03Z W~ 0 CO 0°88 z ggg Z ~00000 000000 00000 000000 AZ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 W ~ ~0 0 0 8o°8 o°gg o ~ ggoo. Z Z o z gS.o©. Z o o ol Z ooooo oooooo oooooo ooooo 000000 000000 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 AZ o o o ° ~/O~ ~ ° o 0 o o g 0 0 0 o z 888 z z c~ c~ c~ z o 7 888888 888888 888888 0 0 W0 0 I~- 0 zn' 0 _J Z o 88~ ~- 8[~ ,~ o o ooo 888 ooo Z Z Z oo~°°° ~ 888 z o o 00000 0 0 00000 800000 880808 800000 0 Z 0 C~ w- 0 ° ..~lfl ffi __ '-~>- 0 < Z Z 888 z ~ Z o 03=o 'mD o o 8 0 0 E E E ddd 0 ~ Z 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 0 o 0 0 888 go~o~ o Z Z oO§o© z o~ o~,~ z o 0 0 0 8o°8 Z ~dd z o Z Z oo.~ z ~,~ z o ~00000 000000 00000 000000 o°8.~ 8. o°.o©. Z 88oo z ~d~ z 8oO. o©' ~00000 000000 00000 o~ o ZZ 0%> 0 0 Z Z 8oOo© z ~;~o~ z o ¥ z 0 0 0 oo~ ~ oOoo I~ 0 0 zz 0 0 O~ 0 ~00000 000000 00000 000000 Z 0 0 0 oOoo. ~°~S o Z Z oo~. o~ ~ oooooo 000088 008080 008800 880008 0 0 0 0 0 C~ ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZZ oo 8 oo 0 0 aO 0 0 0 16 o Z o Z oooooo z ~.~ z o Z o ggg o Z oo °i 0 0 0 0 (D CD .,r- 1:2> ~o . g 0 0 0 g g 0 0 00 goog o Z oOoOoO z ,ggg z 00O4 000 0 Z Z ooSg z ~d z o Z Z 8gg z 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 o 0 0 0 0 (3) o o - ~© 0 0 w0 ~-< -->- z ~uj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z oOoOoO z ggg z g' o~ ggg ddd Z oOoOoo z <::; ~5 <5 Z Z oO~g z g'g z 00000 0000001000000 00000 000000 000000 0 ~ ~ o ~. 00 0 0 (D o o o UJI-- D o 10 ~~ ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LUI-- z~ o~ m~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O~ o 0 >- ILl 'Z 0 Nw~O ~WwO ~w~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o°.88 ~,~ o Z Z ~oo~ z 0 0 0 0 r'," ~ o°8 0 0 888 0 0 =~ 0 0 o ~z Zz ° Z oooo ~dddd d'dddddd 0 0 C~ go° ~oo 0 .,r.. o o°.88 Z oooog z ~dd z goooo o Z 888 Z 00000 000000 000000 00000 000000 000000 0 0 0 ° o e~dd z 0 0 · UJ o ~ ~o4 o Z Z z z o Z o~ c5 c5 Z o 20°2 Z oooooo z ~o~ Z o 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 7tU g oo o o o .J & Z o~cSd z Z 00002 z c~d~ z ~OOOOO OOOOOO OOOOO OOOOOO O O Cq r.D ID o (.3 Z < Z WI-- z~ C~ t~ ° o 161 1 8o°.8 ~oo cD z goOoO z o~dc~ z Z oOoOoO z ~; o~ .~ z ~00000 000000 00000 000000 o o < O O O O O 07 o o =~ 0 0 0 ~0 O~ o ,-: 0 QQOQQ 88o° ,~ o Z Z 888 z 0 Z 8o°8 7 7 z 888 z Z (5c~ Z 0 o 0 0 ° LUI- Z-- 88,~ 80°8 888 o 888 z ~ Z ~00000 000000 00000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 ID) WI,- Z- UJ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Z ,~. mr~ o ~> · nn,' (D 0 I'-- 0 8o°~ o°88 888 ~ o Z Z Z Z z 888 z ~00000 000000 00000 00000 000000 00000~ o 0 00 fl> 03 II ----- ~>_ 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 i'.- 0 0 L~ o ~ 0 0 0-~ Z ' {Zl ooo Z 0 o C) C) {2, o Z Z oOoOoo z ~ z o oooo oo o~ oo 'dd o o~' Z Z Z oo ~g~ ~d z o~ z o o wO ~/~m zJm~O P-~ zz zz u JO ° Z Z z z o o oo Z ggoo z o~o~ z o Z oOoOoo z ~c~d z Z ~ooooo oooooo oooooo ooooo oooooo oooooo 0 o 0 0 0 C~ ~0 CD o~ ° 0 ~cCd 0 ~.oo. Z Z 88o°' z §o°8 Z Z oOoO~ 8o°8 Z 000000 O0 000 000000 0 0000 0 0 aoo. 0 o o 0 w0 O O O o O O o 0 0 0 LC) c.O 0 0 ~ ~ z o 0 . oz 0 z-O oOoO~ Z Z oOoOoo z o,?; ~ o,s; z LUr- Z-- !61 Z oo88 z ~c~d Z ddd 0 Z ~00000 000000 00000 000000 o o 0 0 · ~,- I~ O3 (3) (D CO 4, Tm z~O<g ~ ° ,-.-8 ~o 1 Z 8oo8 z o,s; ,,S; o,S; z o ~ddddo w0 o o 0 Z z 0000 0 0 0000 Z o~dd z o: o Z Z 8gg z cJd~ z ooo88 8o8~oo Z 0 8o°' 0 0 Z 88~ ~ Z ~oooo z o~dd z Z 888 z c~dd z o~ o Z Z 888 z o;~; z ~ 'dddd'dddddd'dddd6d 8 8 o~ 0 0 0 n-___ oz o~ ~ 0 0 ~. . ~q o 0 0 0 0 0 7 Z 888 z c~ ~5 o~ z 000000 O0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~n o o z 888 z z dc~c~ z o o ~ddddd'dddddd n,'~- OZ IJ.l (,~ 0 Z §88 z Z 888 z dd~ z Z Z o z §88 z ~dc5 o Z ooooo oooooo oooooo oooooo ooooo oooooo oooooo oooooo 'ddddd~dddddd'dddddd~dddddd UJ ~1-. OZ 0 0 0 0 0 oz <z 0 I U.I ~3 0.. i I-- u3 o~ o o 0 8 oo I.U OZ 0 ~° 0qJ O0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 Z Z 888 z o oo o 7 z 88oo ;Z Z Ul 0 0 0 g IJ.I n~l-- OZ 0 0 0 Z o~dc5 z 8. o°.8 Z 8,88 z C~ W 5~ ',~e o oZ oo88 o~dd 88o° o ,,% .,% o~ o Z Z Z Z z ~8oo z ggggg8 88gggglgggggg ~ddddd'dddddd dddddd 0 o C~ 0 0 0 Z Z 8oog z o~ c~ c~ z o z 888 Z OZ OZ · 888 z z z o°~ 'ddddd'ddddd d;d d d ddd oz o~ o 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ o ~ o ~ o o ~ ' ~ oi~ o & o z 88 z o ~ o z z 888 z ~ z ~00000 000000 ~00000 00000 000000 00000 ILl I-,- '< oo oo o 0 o o o o 0 ~o o Z Z 8o~8 z o 0 m 5 O~ 0 dci~ 0 888 o o ooo Z Z o Z ~ o z 88 Z 888 z 0 000 000000 0 000 8o8ooo oooooo o88ooo 0 0 0 Z 'i- n go ~ LU ~u- 0 5~ ~q 0 0 o~cSd 0 Z 888 z o~dc5 Z Z 888 z c5c5~ z Z Z o 888 z 1 Z CD 0 0 IJJ n-_ OZ .q- CD (~ 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 n~___ oz n~O w0 0 L~ CD ~ CD CD CD CD 0 CD ~__. OZ © 0 0 000 O0 00000 000000 000000 8o°~ 8o°8 o°o°~ ~c5c/ oO88 c5 c5 c5 888 0 c~ c5c~c5 0 (5 z ~ z 000000 000000 qqqqqq,qqqq~q,qqqqqq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =~ 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 (3O o~o°o° 0O. 8o©' ~ooo Z oO88 z o~dd z S~oS o Z Z 888 z <5c5~ z c) ~00000 000000 00000 000000 0 0 1.1.1 0 0 0 W ~0 ~, o 0 0 nl 88o© Z 8gg z 16 ~¢5c5 0 8.88 7 Z 88o© z o~ c5 c5 z o 8o°8 o~So~ o Z Z 88o© z o ooooo oooooo ooooooI ~ooooo~oooooo~oooooo~ W OZ 0 0 o u~ J~. ,-- >- - I.l.I ~5 o wO co W =~ 0 0 0 8 8 ¥ 0 E~EEEE ooooOe 888 Z Z 0088 z c5 c3 c5 Z o 888 Z o 0 0 0 ~ ~0 o 0 8 o. Z Z oo. 88 z W 5~ ©z 888 o ~ o Z Z Z Z z 888 z z ~ ~ ooo8o 000088 0 0 oo 8 n,~- OZ o ° 888 Z 888 z !61 1 888 888 Z Z o z 888 Z ~z m° 1~0 ~ oo Cq ¢q ..j w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O~ ~0 8 o ~- >~ oo oo~ ~ o°o°8 Z Z 000000 ~ooo~ oo~oo U.I gg~ ~ ~ o Z Z goooo z ~gg z go°.g Z §8§ z ~(:5 Z o 0 LU 0 0 0 0 Z oooog z ggoo. Z Z ggg z ~,~ c5 c5 Z 000000 z ~gg z z dd z o o 0 0 0 0 ~q ULI Z iLU . .~ m (.9 13._ _1 ,,o,, 88,~ 888 888 Z Z 888 z 88~ ~ ~- c~ c~ c~ 0 Z Z 888 z c~ c~ c~ z w0 0 0 0 0 8 ° 0 0 0 88~- ~ ~ 88~- ~ 88~- ~ ~ 88 ooo 008 Z Z Z Z Z Z 888 z 888 z 888 z 88888 800888 800008 o ~o ~ 88~ 88~ ~o~ ~o ~ ~o ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~o ~ ~o 6 o 6 8 & o ~ ' ~ ~ o~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 1 o o 888 o o~o~ o Z Z Z Z o o z 888 z o o 0 0 o ~oo ° O-- ooo Z §§8 z ddo~ z w(D c~ co 00 . 0 I-- LLI ?w --.u_[ go°§ ~ o Z Z o ~oOoO z rom . z]~: u_ 888 ~ o Z Z 008§ z 8o°.8 Z 88~ z 00000 0 0000 ~ddddo'd ddddd o W0 o oo o oo oo~ ~ ~ 888 Z o Z Z oog~ z Z 8000° z ddd Z o ~00000 000000 000000 000000 00000,000000 000000 000000 (D 0 0 0 0 0 W o o 0 0 0 C~ 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r~ o o 888 WO o o o ¢ o o 888 888 z 888 z ooooo 808088 · ~ . . ~ . 888 Z oo88 z ~;~o~ z 0°.88 o o Z Z Z Z z 888 z w0 o o o°.8 o o o o ~,o mmmO oo o~ W0 o o 888 o~ o Z o oO88 z r~ Z oo88 z ~d~5 Z W0 o o o . o o°88 00.8.0°' Z o 0°88 000 0 Z Z z o088 Z 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 I~. . . & q 0 0 0 ~o caz_ .-~ cO o 8o°8 o;~ o Z Z z 888 z Z Z o z ~ Z o°.88 Z Z Z 00000 000000 000000 000000! ~00000 000000 000000 000000 0 0 0 0 z z <_z 0 u.lO 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 I'~ ~0 0 0 0 O0 Z oOo~oo z oq CD 0 0 0 zI. LIn' Oi~ ~ Oz Z oooooo z 0 ILl Z LLI .-I 0 o o o ~ ~,~oo. z z .,~ .~ .~ z 0 o oo o ~q 0 o~ Z o~ c5 c5 z Z oo. oo. 8 z Z oooooo z 'ddddd'dddddd'dddddd 0 0 w0 0 0 o O~ >- 1 ~d Od z o 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0°8 Z gS§ z 888 Z z z 880© Z 00008 z ddd z 0°88 Z Z 80000 z 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 dddddd'dddddo'ddbddd w0 0 0 0 w0 C~ 0 0 0 w0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W C~ n" °o. 88 ~o ,,~ ,~ o Z Z 888 z o~dci z o°88 o~ o o o°.88 Z Z Z Z z 888 z z ~d z ~ 0 ~ o ~o; o o Z Z Z Z Z Z 8~ z ~8~ z ooo z odd z ddd z ddd z ~dd d d d~dd d ddd'd d dddd Z Zz Zz w0 w0 w0 0 0 0 ~ >~ z/<o I-- 0 z w< On~ n~w ~D 88~ ooo o oo Z 161 1 ~ o ~ o Z Z o o 888 zooo°°° z o o 00000 000000 00000 000000 0 ~0 w0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o i 0°88 Z ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 888 Z~ 0 0 0 0 0 O ZZ ~ ~ o ~ 0 .... ~ °o 888 o~o~ o Z Z 8oO8 z o~ o~ o~ z o Z oO88 z o~]o~ o Z Z o088 z ooo Z 8oo8 z o~c~d z o 88o© ~So~ o Z Z ~o ~o o~ z o 161 oo°~. ~ ~ ~ o ~ o~ o Z 8oO8 z ~o~ z o 1 Z oo88 z dc~o~ z ~00000 000000 000000 00000 000000 00000 000000 000000 ~00000 000000 0 ~ 0 bzom 0 w0 0 0 0 0 0 ~Eoooo 0 eO d ~0 d ,-': o 6 8 ~' 8 © 0 gg Z o~oOoo z 0 0 0 Z 880° z ~ z Z 888 z o~ <:5 c5 z o ggg 7 Z 888 z ~ z o Z 7 Z 80o8 z ~c~ z o ooooo gggooo ooooog goooOoooog googoo°° oo >~: o ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ o 0 O0 0 o~ 0 0 0 0 g g 0 0 .~. 0 0 c5 o 7 Z 0o. 88 = ggg z Z 888 z ~.~ ¢~ c~ z ~00000 000000 00000 000000 000o8 Z ooo ~ 0°88 Z i_--~ ti> g 8 ~c5 0 z 0 ° rn o u?, Z Z ddo~ z U.I ~-n~ ---z tow o o o Z 0088 z ~c~c~ z Z 888 z c5 c5 c5 z 161 1 gog~ o~ ~ o~ o o g88 ggg z ggg z Z ~ Z 00000 000000 000000 000000 000000 o ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r~ ti> ~ > © ~o Zz 0 o 0 0 0 0 O~ 888 Z 00008 z 00000 0 0 0 0 ~z ~ 888 ~o~ o Z Z 888 z ~;~;~ z o 888888 0 -r W o o o o z 888 z z ~ z 0 0 ~ o I'-- 0 0 I'-,- II ),./ =J ~ o Z 0 0 0 0 88o° Z ~c~d z Z 0o88 z dc~c~ z ~00000 000000 000000 00000 000000 Wo 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0o88 z ~;~o~ z 16t I Z ~ 888 ggg o 00.8.0©' oo~ 8g~ ~ ~ o~d~ 0 Z ggg z o Z 00000 oooooo ooooo oooooo ~88 0 ° o. I--C~ 0 0 Z o o°.o°.~ 7 Z ggg z o :[o] o Z Z ggg z ggg z o 88~ ~ ~ ~.~dd 0 Z g8g z o 00000 000000 000000 00000 000000 000000 ~o zg z~o _ Zo o ~o I o 0 w0 0 w o o o ! o ~ o o o ~ ~ g 8 ~ g 8 8 ~ g 8 o1~ g 8 8 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O~ O0 0 0 o ~ ~ z ,- XZ ~ LUZ -- (DO 0 ~ wo~ ~ ~.~.~ ~=w ~ w~ ~ z<~ ~z ~ ~ Wu~ ~ ~ o wO~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o ggg Z Z 888 z c~ c~ o~ z o 00000 000000 00000 000000 ~ 0 o 7, oo~ ~ Z Z oooooo 22,2,2.2.2 o w0 ~ o Z oo~oo z Z Z ~ooo~ ooooo~ ~Z <0 o Z Z 8oooo z ~ z wo >< Z ~ o Z z 0 0 0 0 Z Z ~,~o° z z o o Z z oo. oo. oO. = o~o z o ~Z ZzU~ Zz ~Z ~o ~ o o z o o UJ ~ )>- )1-- o gg~ ~ ggg Z oo~g z 0 0 0 0 Z ~dd z ooo 0 0 0 0 Z ~00000 000000 00000 000000 ~,~ ¢0 ~ 0 0 "-- ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 gg~ ~ o ggg ggg o Z Z ggg z o~ z o Z ggg z dd~ z o >< gg~ ~ o goOg Z oOgg z o Z ggoo z c::; ~ d z >< Z Z o E~EEEE Z z Z oo~ Z ddd Z 000000 000000 0000 0 ddddod;dddddd 'ddddd'dd .... iLLIn", _1 Z Zz 0 ~0 z 0 W0 W0 0 o o o o o o o o o ~,ww zl-- Z~ 5 o o o o ~0 o ~ c~ [ ° ~Z ~ ° o o o o o o o ~0 o o o o o o o Z oOoOoO z W0 o o co'lOW z oooo~ z ~' z Z oooooo z oe~d~ z 0000 0 880000 o~oooo <cz c~ o o o o o 0 o o o ~o ~o ~o & o o o oo Z oOoOoO z ddo~ Z o ~00000 00000 o o ~0~ ~ 0 w-- 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 E~EE~ gsg Z gsg Z ¢~ c~ o~ z Z ggg z ~ z oog Z ggoo z ~d z Z ggg z ~ z o ggg oOoOg ~oo. Z Z o z ggg Z Z Z Z / oooooo oooooo oooooo ooooo oo~ooo ggg.gg 000000 000000 000000 .00000 o rj 0 O. 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 II ~' ~>-~- "rw .ti.. w0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 Z 0 o wo ~ ~ o g 0 . 0 0 0 ~goo z]z ~ oJ '-i ~ n,./n.,' 0 0 0 0 ~0 0 o wo o~o°~ ~ ~ · g~ o ~ I° oO. goo. Z Z .qq~qq w0 0 0 0 0 o Z Z 8oo8 z °o88 z 0 0 0 Z ~ z o o o o 0 ~0 ~wn- o o oo o o ~ Z>- Z 000 Z 000 Z 0o88 z 8~- ~ o 0°8 Z o088 z 08080 008808 800000 WO o 0o e~ LLI ~tm~a 0 · II.-r .r..wu') WO o o o ~0 (3o z .~ o~ o~ o z Z oo88 z (5<5(5 z o o o o o ! o 8oo ~ o o · 0 0 0 OD 0 ©© 0 000 000000 ~dddd d'd ddddo o°88 Z Z z 08oO z ooooooloooooo dddddd dddddd o o°88 Z Z z 888 z 888 o 000 0 Z Z 0 z 888 Z ddd o Z Z o z ~ ooo qqq z 888 z ~ ~00000 000000 00000 000000 000000 000000 00000 000000 ~00000 000000 000000 000000 ~ddddd'dddddd ~ddddd'bddddd'dddddd'dddddd W ~-~w o o 0 & W © Z Z ~8.8. z ~.o z oo 888 Z Z oo~ z 888 Z g88 z o~ Z ooo gg~ o ~ ~.88. Z Z 8.8.8 z oooe~ z o oo o TGI Z Z~ Z Z Z Z ~ z ~ z ~ = ~ Z ~ Z ~' z gSooo o~o88o ~ooooo mm Z 888 z ~ z go°g z ggoo z o z ddd z z dd~ z z § § ,?:, z ~dd z Z 800.8 z ~o o~ ~o z ~od o z Z o gOOoo z ddd z o E~EEEE o ~4 ~r 0 0 0 ~0 o o o 0 __z n F. ° Zz {2> ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o II ~ W0 0 o o 0 ~' 0 ~- ° o o ~0 .l-tiJ ~'- LLi LLi ~_z ~ Zz tlJ03 o o° o o~ ~ o°8 0 0 0 Z~ © © o o c0 I~J UJ Z W ~ n N ii ,~ w '~' 0 o o o o Z Z 8~ z o 0 0 0 0 0 o oo Z 880° z ooo Z §008 z Z ggg z g~g z goooog ooogoo ooggoo ~d dd6 d'dddddd'dd dddd 0 0 0 Z-3 DCm m~ 0 go° go° 0 '~ LO0 l ° c~ oo~ z~ ~ ozl~ ggg o o o o o o 7 7 7 z §goo z z c~dd z ggggg zTM n,u'> UO (.> ~z~ z(~ oo8 Z 8gg z Z::D fid 0 ~go° C> "~ C~ ~0 ° o Z Z o 8oO8 z ggg z r~ d c~ c~ d d :g o ~ n W W z oo. oO. oO. z o ~ ~ ° ° o o. c0 o o~ ~, ~o o z °088 .~.~g o z Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~§ z ~§ z ooo z ooo z z ~ Z~ ~d d Z ' ' ' Z Z ' ' ' Z ~ooooo oooooo oooooo oooooo oooooo oooooo oooooot o o o o 00 ° =r LLI Z 0 0 o o ~0 ~o Z~ o o c:, o o o o o o o ,, i~ ~ _l o o Itl o o & Z~ I--._i c~ LIJ &-~> o o o o o 880°' 8oO. 8 0 0 ,,,,88. C~ ~0 ~0 C~ C~ ~S o ~ ~ '~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z~ Z~ Z~ Z~ <~ ~z ~_ ~ 0 0 ~0 0 0 0 W0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 & ~ ~ o o o · o ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ o O0 O~ O0 O0 0 ! Oz ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Z ~ ~0 ~ o~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 Z 8oo8 z ~dd Z 16 Z oo88 z ~dd z o8oo8 o88oo 8ooo88 W0 0 8 0 0 80°.8 ~o ~o ~o o Z Z 888 z ~;~ z o z: i © W0 0 0 0 ~ ~o ,~ oo c5 c~ c5 0 888 Z o 88.8 Z oO88 8.88 Z Z oO88 z c~d~ z 8. o°.8 000 0 Z Z 888 z o~ c5 <5 z o 8o°8 ~; ~; o~ o Z Z oO. 88 = ~, ,~, ,~ z o ~00000 000000 ~00000 000000 00000 000000 00000 ~ 8Oo Z~ lZ~ Z~ 'Z~ Z~ Z~ w~ w~ w~ ~ u~ ~Z Zz Zz ~o ~o wO w0 Iw · 0 0 0 w0 0 0~ ~1 0 0 t'- 0 0 I~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~'~ O0 ~ ~0/1~ m ~ zz W/zT T~WO °I" ~R ~ ° I~ ° Z [8Oo z oo8 Z 888 z o~ c5 c5 z o o ~ 888 o~ o 00000 000000 000000 00000 000000 000000 z:~ n,~,- 0 0 o 0 8 ° 0 88.8 o ~ Z Z o z Z oo88 z o~ z 000000 0000 0 000000 --~Z Z~ z_ ZD w0 o o o. c~ o i° 0 m~. ~ ° © W~ o o o oo8o° Z e~C~c~ Z 161 ~oo~ o ~ z Z o o 1 z 0 O0 000000 ZD n-0~ D~n m~ o° o W Z >- n- < o oo o o ZD n,~o 0 o o ~0 0 '~-- 0 ,~0 O0 ° 7 Z o Z oooooo z ~;~ z Z goOoO z ~,~ z o oO~ Z Z oOgoo z c~c~ Z o go°§ Z oooo§ z 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 oooooo oooooo oooooo ooooo~,~~ d d d ddd'd d d d dd'dddddd'd d ddd~ oo~ Z~ Z~ ~ Z~ ~ ZTM ~ ~ Z~ ~ ~ d o o o ~ ~ !° ° ~o~o ~oo gS~ ~oo 0 0 0 0 0 o a o ~ o ~ o o 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ Z ~ II o~ ~ ~ ~~ i <~ ~ WZ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 O0 0 Z 0 Z Z z 0o. 88 Z Z oOoOoo z ~cSd z o ~00000 000000 00000 00000 000000 ~00000 j~ Z~ n~o~ ZI-- Z~ o o Z< zn' wQ '-~ U.I tuff- ~: ~-m ~ o Z z oOoOoO z 0 ZD ° oooooo z Z Z 0 0 o o o z ~d~ z ' 'd 'dd'ddddd ' o o ~0 ~0 z~ J~ Z~ D W 0 z ggg Z ~ 000 0 00000 ~8~ooo ~o~ 8ooooo o o Z~ wo o° o o .J~ LU-- Wn~ I~O ~ ° w0 o ' Z Z ~ z ~oooo z ! I 0 z gg§ z ~ 8g~ ggg o O~ ddd 0 Z Z g§g z g°°oo z ~g ujo i° II Z 0 0 0 o°gg 7 Z ggg z ~d~ z o o Z Z z ~ z ~ gooSoo gooooo~oooooo ogggg8 ggg§gg o 0 0 o ° 0 0 0 © © 0 0 Z Z Z o z ggg z z ggg z 8oo. 0 0 io~ o ~ o~ oO g 00 Z ddo~ z 888888 o o 88~ ~ 888 Z 888 z ~o~o~ z Z"- . 0 Z n,'l- 0 ~- _o. z ~z z ~ ° 0 0 0 888 Z ~dd z 88,~ ,~ Z oO88 z dc~o~ z 0 0 =~ ~ ,- o o o ~0 ~0 "-~ LIJ aO o 0 0 o o Z 888 z ~o~ z Z 888 7z ~ddddd'dddddd Z 888 z ~o~ z o o. 888 ~ o Z Z o ~E~. 0 0 0 II ~c5~ 0 Z Z Z c5 (:5 c5 Z (;3 ~d dd dd'd dddd d U.I._ o. 0 0 0 C~ Z oo~ z o~gg o Z Z 88oo z ddd z ° 161 Z §o~g z oo o 8oo. o°' dddddd dddddd:dddddd Om 0 >< 0 o ~0 w0 0 0 O< 1 ~; o; ~; o ~00000 000000 00000 000000 0 0 CO 00 ooo Z 0 0 0 cO 0 II W O> ~× CO 88~- ~ ~ o~ o ~ o Z Z o 888 z o O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 o~88 ~ oo~ 80880 oooooo >4 0 0 B9 © >4 o. 8. 8.~ 5 ~. 0 w- ~ 0 0 0 _J IJ.l o 888 o ~ o Z Z Z Z o o z 888 z z ~ z o o o88oo ~5 5e 0 o. o~ >- W Z DD ~/0~ ~ o o OZ 888 o Z 888 z ~o~ z o8888 008000 Z © 0 o ~m ° ~ 8~ o ~z h~ o 888 888 z o g o Z ~ z ~oo~ z o 00000 00000 0 0 0 0 ~ CO 8°o8 Z 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 ~) oo g o 0 oo 8 000000 0 0 (~ ~ ~ o 0 o~ ~ Z o o o o ggo~ o Z Z ggg z 0000 000 O0 goooo8 ooo8oo 0 ~0 ~0 ~0 w0 Ct n'~ Oo. oO.~ ~,_ C> oct 0. T'~-- _J ~oo 0 Z ggg z ~ z o o°.88 go°§ Z 888 z ogogg z Z 8gg z dd~ z 0000 000000 000000 ~0000 000000 000000 zl- z zD Om O~ zTM UJ~ 0 ~ o0 o Z goooo z ~c5c5 z o 0 cO 0 0 0 0 oO. oO.~ E ° o ~ o o Z c5c5~ z o o~ o Z Z 88~ z o~dc~ 0 o ~c~c~ o Z 8008 z ~c5~ Z o oooog goooog ooo8oo 0 0 ~0 0 0 =_~ Z Z o~g~ o ~ o o~o~ o Z Z ~c5c5 Z o c~c~ 0 ' Z o088 z c5 c5 c5 Z o !6 ~ o ~ Z ~.oo.~ z ,.~ ,~ ,~ z o ~o~ o ~ Z Z 0088 z 0 0 0 00 zE "-iz 7~ U.I~ 0 0 o wO 0 0--C~ 0 z LUW zu.I ~ ° 00 z'~ LLi ,~,- TO O,n w0 00 ~0 ~0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 ~oo8I 0 E~EEEE 0 0 0 0 Z Z o~o~ z Z Z oo88 z o 888 '7 Z Z 88o© z o~dd z 888 ~ o Z Z oO88 z o~ o~ ~; z Z 888 z ~d z 00000 000000 00000 000000 0000 ZZ~ w0 z~ z_ z~ ~z ~z ~z Z~ Z~ Z~ Om m om 0 0 0 0 d ~ o , o ~ O0 O0 O0 --z ~ Z 0 0 0 r~ O~ I-- Z W o°88 o~,~ o Z Z o 8oO~ ~ ~ c5 c5 c5 0 888 Z 888 z ~ z Z~ t--n ~..J Om u.i0 0 0 0 0 Z ooooo~ z Z oogoo z Z ~dd z 0 C> 0 0 0 (D .~ zE --~z z~ i.iJ ~-- w0 >< 00 ~ ° ~/) . z goooo z 7 Z o o Z Z oogg z c~do~ z Z ~dd z o LU~- 0 mO 0m z~ D_J ° w ~, w E zD ~,~ LU~- m~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~- ._.1 ~ ° 000 000000 00000 000000 ~ddddd'dddddd'dddddd'dddddd ~ddddd 888 Z 888 Z gSoo z o .._1 o o ~ o Z Z Z Z z 888 z z ~ z o 00000 000000 o W0 >< 0 0 0 w W ~ O~ o ww o Z oo88 z o~dd z Z~ o 0 0 _JO') 888 Z Z Z 888888 W0 n," / i~ iiiz O/wg0 I o°88 o°88 Z Z Z Z z oO88 z Z dOo~ Z o 0 o "'iZ Z~ LIJ "'- 32(.9 003 qqq~ qqq~ ooo~ ooo~ dd~ ~ qqq~q~ q ~ 000000 0 ~ !61 161 1' Notice Of Meetings Naples Heritage Community Development District The Board of Supervisors of the Naples Heritage Community Development District will hold their meetings for Fiscal Year 2003 at the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Clubhouse, 8150 Heritage Club Way, Naples, Florida at 9:00 a.m. on the second Monday as follows: October 14, 2002 January 13, 2003 March 10, 2003 May 12, 2003 June 9, 2003 July 14, 2003 There may be occasions when one or more Supervisors will participate by telephone. At the meeting location there will be present a speaker telephone so that any interested person can attend the meeting at the meeting location and be fully informed of the discussions taking place either in person or by telephone communication. Any person requiring special accommodations at this meeting because of a disability or physical impairment should contact the District Office at (954) 753- 0380 at least five calendar days prior to the meeting. Each person who decides to appeal any action taken at these meetings is advised that person will need a record of the proceedings and that accordingly, the person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, including the testimony and evidence upon which such appeal is to be based. Gary L. Moyer Manager 161 1 US HOME CORPORATION South Florida Land Division · 10481 Six Mile Cypress Parkway · Fort Myers, Florida 33912 · Administration 941-278-1177 · Fax 941-278-0883 May13,2002 Board of Supervisors Naples Heritage Community Development District Dear Board Members: The documentation to transfer the South Florida Water Management District Permit from Construction Phase to Operation Phase has been turned in to the Water Management District for review. Before SFWMD can transfer the permit all Limiting and Special. Conditions of the permit have to be meet. At this time there are two out standing issues. A Conservation Easement has to be recorded on Tract B, US Home's Attorney Steve Kushner will be submitting the easement to the WMD for approval within the next week to ten days. After the WMD approves the easement, it will then be recorded with Collier County. At that time the land that the Conservation Easement encompasses will be deeded to Naples Heritage CDD. The Permit required the planting of 2.4 acres of Littoral Plants, US Home will be planting 1,928 Trees and 3,853 Herbaceous plants divided between Lakes 6,8,9,11,12,13 and 14. The trees will consist of Laurel Oaks, Maple, Bay, Cypress and Willow, depending on availability. Herbaceous plants will be composed of Dahoon Holly, Wax Myrtle, Spartina, Dlechnum, Boston fern, Bacopa, Maidencan, Sagittaria, Pontederia, Thalia and Water lily again depending on availability.. The Littoral Planting Contract will require a five year 80% survival guarantee. When the two permit issues are resolved, South Florida Water Management District should transfer the Environmental Resource Permit from the Construction Phase to Operation Phase. ~oo o U ~ r,. oooo oooo oooo o o D 161 oo ZZ U 0 HH~ §~SOO~o §°°~oo ~ 0 ~> W oo oo 0 0 0 §~§°§°°§§°§~°°§oo§o~7oo ~ ~ ~ o~§§§§§§§~°~§°°~°°~~o~oo oo ~ ~ ~ 0 161 Advt$oe¥ ~o~Itt~ 2685 Horseshoe Dhve South, Suite 212 Naples, FL 34104 November 7, 2002 AGENDA II. III. IV. Vo VII. VIII. X. CAI,I, MEETING TO ORDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 3, 2002 TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. Budget Report 1. MSTU Fees LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT: OLD BUSINESS: A. Street Lights B. New Member- Charles Arthur C. Utility Pole Easemem D. Installation of Benches E. Logo F. Sidewalk & Bike Paths G. Sign Posts H. Comer of Vanderbilt Beach & Vanderbflt Drive water I. WCI - Landscaping in front of pipes J. Febmarys Meeting NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC COMMENTS ADJOImNMF2~ The next meeting is scheduled for Z:30 PM, December 5th, Z00Z AT VETERANS PAl:IrK It'!isc. Corres: ,Advtsoe¥ ~om~ltt~ 2685 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 SUMMARY Minutes October 3~, 2002 III. VII. Approval of Minutes: BJ moved to approve the minutes of Sept. 4% 2002 as corrected. Seconded by Carol Wright. Carried. NEW BUSINESS: BJ moved to authorize the Transportation Dept. to purchase the 4x4 wooden posts, like the original ones, install them, and the property owners will paint them and the original names will be placed on them. Seconded Carol Wright. Carried unanimously. Dick will write letter to Mr. Etelamki concerning the MSTU fees charged to the Committee. The committee wants a clarification of the charges for justification. An arbitrary fee of $25,000 is charged to ali MSTU's for support services. The committee feels it should be fair and equitable and would like to see a summary. Advtsoe¥ ~o~itt~ 2685 Horseshoe Drive South, Suite 212 Naples, FL 34104 Minutes October 3~, 2002 I. Dick Lydon, Vice Chairman, called the meeting to order at 2:40 PM. II. ATrF2qDANCE: Committee Members: Dick Lydon, Carol Wright, BJ. Savard-Boyer, Bud Martm (excused). Collier County: Bob Petersen, Val Prince, Others: MariaJost- Commercial Land Maintenance, Sue Chapin-Manpower Services. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Corrections to Sept. 4~ minutes are as follows: Bottom of Page 2 - last sentence should read "Charles Arthur previously (of) Arthur Andersen and Bill Eliene both seemed to be very qualified." Same page - 5* lines down should read: "He stated that the total value is set at 1 MIL." This should be changed through-out the minutes. Page 4 - third paragraph down should read "There was an item of New Business, which was the need to vote for the new chairman since "Frank Halas" is no longer with the committee and Dick is "Vice Chair". BJ. moved to approve the minutes of Sept. 4'~, 2002 as corrected. Seconded by Carol Wright. Carded Unanimously. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: Bob Petersen explained this is now the end of the fiscal year and a new system (SAP) will hopefully be in operation by January 2003. This will make the budgets much easier to read. Val Prince went over the figures with the Committee. The Revenues are estimated at $917,300 - interest $10,000, and a negative $46,100. To simplify it there will be an improved Spread Sheet next month. No money has been put into Capitol Improvements yet or any debt incurred. The Contractual Services of $80,000 will be mostly for Commercial Land Maintenance. He explained the balance of the budgeting process. This is just a draft. A fiscal person from Finance will be working with the Department. The Contract for CLM is for a 2 year period and can be renewed at that time. The new Contracts are for a 3 year renewal period and if the County is happy with their service the County then offers them an opportunity to renew their Contract. If they do not wish to renew, then the Contract would be let. It is the 161 Counties option on renewing fa'st, and then theirs with a 30 day cancellation ff not satisfied. Bob mentioned they will have another item on their budget sheet called "Carry Forward". This committee's money will probably roll into the following year if no large projects are done. Val checked the Contract with CLM and their renewal is for a total of 3 years. Dick said they will wait until January and see how the Budget and Spread Sheets look before they make any other comments. Bob assured the Committee that their mil rate is a .5 Mil. At the first of the year the Committee will be asked if they wish to keep it at that rate. The cap can be changed and if increased would have to go the Board of County Commissioners and can lower if so wished. If not a lot of large projects dne, it can be lowered. It was noted that the community is not happy with the Mil rate at this time and perhaps needs to be explained to them. It was brought up that this Committee has the highest amount of Revenues to be received. BJ. mentioned the Non-Homestead properties increased tremendously and many have never paid attention to the MSTU's figure. She mentioned Abe Skinner will be attending and speaking at their Association meeting to explain their appraisals. LANDSCAPE MAINTF2qANCE REPORT: Bob introduced MariaJost who is taking Roberts place today. She handed out a report on the Vandalism Tracking Report. She has been in touch with Deputy Matthews and Corporal Dean. Corporal Dean is in an interviewing process to see if they can fmd who is responsible for the damages and vandalism. Corporal Dean suggests the neighborhood report all incidents to the North Naples Police Sub-Station at 793-9426. They are also working closely with the Vanderbilt Beach Property Owners Association. A camera installed in a tree was suggested. OLD BUSINESS: A. Street Lights - Bob didn't have anything to report at this meeting but suggested having a meeting with property owners or Associations. A community wide evening meeting was discussed with an agenda to explain what an MSTU is and also the lighting situation. It was discussed holding the meeting in February as their regular meeting. The members will discuss it among their Associations, get feed-back, and make a decision at the next meeting. B. New Member - Charles Arthur - will be officially invited to the next meeting. C. Utility Poles - Sprint will bury all the telephone lines on Vanderbilt Drive. Dick mentioned that all the telephone poles on the side streets on Vanderbilt Beach are on private property. It was discussed whether there 2 161 has been an easement granted in their deeds. BJ will check and report back to the Committee. D. Installation of Benches - Maria reported they discussed a way of securing the benches without being unsightly. They are making cement nmners from the front of the bench to the back. The decorative brick will be placed on top then drill through the brick into the cement. Three are fmished: Palm Court, Trade Winds and the end of Vanderbilt (entrance of the dunes). One will be in front of Vanderbilt Inn, one in front of Vanderbilt Resort and one at the comer of Vanderbilt Beach and Vanderbilt Drive and one at Gulf Shore Drive. CLM will come up with a solution of some type of grass at Trade Winds. E. Logo - will discuss later. Carol asked ff anyone looked into the situation of the Sidewalk and Bike Paths coming together. Bob will remind Mr. Etelamaki and report at the next meeting. 1 NEW BUSINESS: -Dick talked abut the posts. The posts are being replaced with steel posts from the wooden posts that have been there for many years. The Committee felt the beauty of it is not there with the steel posts. Property owners would replace them in the past, paint and put them in the ground. Bob said if the MSTU wished to supply the lumber they would continue with the wooden posts. BJ moved to authorize the Transportation Dept. to purchase the 4x4 wooden posts, like the original ones, install them, and the property owners will paint them and the original names will be placed on them. Seconded Carol Wright. Carried Unanimously. -Dick will write a letter to Mike Etelamaki concerning the MSTU fees charged to the Committee. The Committee wants a ratification of the charges for justification. An Arbitrary fee of $25,000 is charged to all MSTU's for support services. The Committee feels it should be fair and equitable and would like to see a summary. -Dick talked about the Reconnection meeting between Vanderbilt Lagoon and Clam Pass. The Corp. of Engineers is proposing $10 Million to regrow the mangroves. Dick is asking whether they could get Pelican Bay to put in 2/3 - they put in 2 Milhon and this MSTU Committee put in 1 Million. He feels Pelican Bay has a lot more to gain. This would benefit many people. The Ordinance would have to be rewritten. Discussion followed. -BJ asked ff something could be done about the pond on the comer of Vanderbilt Beach and Vanderbilt Drive. She feels it is a mosquito swamp since water is being trapped in that area. It is poorly designed and needs 1 drainage. Bob and Val will fred out who to contact about the issue and report back at the next meeting. -BJ asked if there is any type of landscaping that could be done in front of the Treasse ? Building's red water pipes. Bob suggested that the Vice Chairman write a letter to them requesting they do some landscaping m the front of the pipes in keeping with the beautification of the neighborhood. Dick will call WCI and make them aware of it. -Naples Park was discussed. VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT: BJ moved to adjourn, seconded Carol. Meeting was adjourned at 3:50 PM. The next meeting is scheduled for 2:30 PM, November 7th, 2002 AT VEq~S PARK 4 ~ COMMERCIAL LAND MAINTENANCE, INC. 370 COMMERCIAL BLVD. · NAPLES, FL 34104 OFFICE: (941) 643-6205 · FAX: (941) 643-5012 ~.-MAIL: cornrnland@aol, corn Vanderbilt Vandalism Tracking Report 1. First report called in on 06-14-02 to report vandalism to sprinkler heads and risers from Egret and Heron to the north end of Flamingo. In addition, we reported that the exact pattern of damage has occurred over the past few weeks, (same location). ACTION TAKEN: Additional Patrols during late evening to early morning hours. Report #0200018827 2. Second report called in on 07-16-02 to report vandalism to sprinkler heads and risers once again, from Egret and Heron to the north end of Flamingo. Reminded Deputy, J. Michael Matthews, that this is an on-going problem. ACTION TAKEN: Corporal Scott Dean assigned to patrol area. No suspect found at this time. Report #0200021827 3. Third report called in on 09-30-02 to report three incidences of vandalism as follows: A. 09-20-02 sprinkler heads and risers unscrewed and smashed or tossed onto the street between Flamingo and Seabee. Report # 29760-02. B. 09-26-02 same type of damage and same location. Report #29765-02. C. 09-30-02 Same type of damage from Conners to Egret. Report #29767-02. ACTION TAKEN: I suggested that the damage might be happening during the day as children leave school and many are "latch-key kids" with time to spare before parents arrive home from work. This has been reported to Corporal Scott Dean and he will change patrol hours. October 1, 2002 received a message from Bob Petersen, Project Manager, that Mastec workers have seen some vandalism in progress. Reported this information to Deputy J. Michael Matthews today, 10-01-02 at 11:10 a~m. He is reporting to Corporal Scott Dean to possibly interview the Mastec workers. He is also alerting the neighborhood to report all incidents to the North Naples Police Sub-Station at 793-9426. October 3, 2002 spoke with Corporal Scott Dean (793-9528) who informed me that Deputy Joe Indiero (Community Oriented Police) is working closely with the "Vanderbiit Home Owner's Association" in order to catch the criminals in the act. Also, Corporal Scott will call Mastec in an attempt to locate the workers that were in the area on 09-30- 02. Maria Jost Administrative Assistant o o 0 U 0 ~ 00000000000000 0 0 ~ 00000000000000 0 0 ~o oooooooooooooo ~ ~ o~ooooomoom~ ~ ~ O~ O~ >4 r~l 00000000000000 0 0 00000000000000 0 0 1 0 o 0 © 0 o m o cq n. 0 U © 00000000000000 0 0 00000000000000 0 00000000000000 0 00000000000000 0 0 00000000000000 0 0 ~ 00000000000000 0 0 ~ 00000000000000 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~o~o~ ~ ~ 0 0~0~0~~ oooooooooooo ~oo~ooooooo ~00~~00 o o o o o O0 O0 O0 0 0 O0 O0 O0 0 0 161 o o o 0 0 oo oo oo ~ oo oo oo o oo oo oo ~0 ~U $ O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 o o o o ~; o o o o o o o o o o 120 0 0 o o 161 I ~' 8 8888888888888 ~ ~" zw z o~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ w~ii ~<< z 0 WWwll~ 0~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ 0 --w ~11 w ~O00wg~mm~OwO ~ ~mm _ FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 Vendor ! Contractor: Commercial Land Maintenance Fund Numbel 143-162543-634999-00000 Vanderbilt Beach MSTU Beautification PO#: 000000 Budgeted Amount: $80,000 !61 Invoice Date Description of Services / Materials Adjustments Invoice Amt alance on Pt 00/00/2002 Ori~linal Purchase Order ~ ~ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $o.o0 $o.00 $o.oo $o.oo $o.o0 $o.oo $o.0o $o.o0 Totals to Date $0.00 $0.00 ~ 1 FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 Vendor / Contractor: Commercial Land Maintenance, In~ PO #: 000000 Fund Numbe1143-162543-634999-00000 Inc. PO. $10,000.00 Vanderbilt Beach MSTU Beautification Budgeted Amount: $80,000 INCIDENTALS Invoice Date Description of Expense PO Amount Amount Exp. Balance 4-Oct-02 Original Budgeted Amount ~ ~ $0.00 $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo, , $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Totals to Date [ $0.001 $0.00 ~~ September 25, 2002 I LET IT BE KNOWN that the LIBRARY ADVISORy BOARD met on this date session at 2:00 p.m. in the Main Library with the following members present: Ftala CHAIR: Jaculyn K. Dering Carter _ -- Herming _ - -- VICE-CHAIR: Doris J. Lewis Goyle v/Z/ Sabina Musci Col~tta _-- L/ -- ~ ~,.-:~: ABSENT: Syd Mellinger Diane Williams ALSO PRESENT: John W. Jones, Library Director Jim Mudd, County Manager Marilyn Matthes, Assistant Director Helen Eckhardt, President, Friends of the Library Roberta Reiss, Literacy Coordinator Linda Fasulo, Public Information Specialist Luz Pietri, Administrative Assistant APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mrs. Dering asked for comments or corrections to the minutes of September 25, 2002. There being none, Mrs. Lewis moved, seconded by Ms. Musci and carded unanimously, that the minutes be approved as submitted. There were two members of the public who had requested to speak to the Library Board. Mr. Graham Ginsberg and Mrs. Kim Swat (?). Mr. Ginsberg wanted the Library to make the video descriptions more definitive .... that his concern was that 'R' rating should be elaborated beyond what was on the packaging. Mr. Jones explained the Library's present policy to Mr. Ginsberg and to Mrs. Swat. She stated she was pleased to learn that we had such a policy in effect. Mr. Jones informed all present that from now on, he would ask all libraries to post ratings in a conspicuous location with expanded descriptions for all ratings. The poster will also advise patrons of the availability of a video comments form and where they can pick one up. Should someone accidentally select an 'R' rated movie, a notation will be made in the patron's library record, at the patron's request, that will signal the circulation staff to advise the patron that the video he has may contain footage he would prefer not to view. Mr. Ginsberg and company left. The Library Advisory Board cautioned the library director not to become a censor and stated they felt his solutions to be excellent. Mrs. Dering read letters of commendation to Roberta Reiss for her excellent work with the Literacy Program and to Ronney Cox for her excellent work with the Seniors on Line Program. Roberta Reiss, Literacy Coordinator, talked about the upcoming events. She illtroduced Linda Fasulo, Public Information Specialist for the Library, who had been appro~'~e~[[gS~'heresa Lane from Verizon offering a literary partnership with the Library. They would ~ut ad ad in the Library's web page and the Library would, in mm, be listed onltheir would also give the Library a grant in the amount of $20,000.00. Mr. Jones stated that he wanted the Library Board to be aware of this proposal. Mr. Mudd commented that the Library should be aware of link connections and study the matter carefully to avoid any future problems. More to come. REPORTS OF OFFICERS -None COMMUNICATIONS - None UNFINISHED BUSINESS The Board reviewed the nominations submitted for selection of the Library's Employee of the Month. Mrs. Lewis moved, seconded by Ms. Musci and carried unanimously, to select Silvia Puente from the Immokalee Branch as Employee of the Month for September 2002. Mr. Jones reported that the first of three conditional use heatings was held on September 19, 2002, with the second and third tentatively scheduled for mid-October and mid-November, respectively. As the State of Florida matching construction grant is due to expire December 23, 2002. Construction bids have already been solicited, reviewed, and are ready to be awarded. This is subject to the granting of a conditional use permit on the property. The results of the bidding will be presented to the BCC for approval and contract award at the October 22, 2002 Board meeting. NEW BUSINESS - None GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Some of the Board members expressed their congratulations to Mr. Jones for a recent well- written article in the Naples Daily News. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Mr. Jones stated that the Library would be holding its semi-annual book sale starting October 25th. He also stated that all the upcoming Library Programs have been listed on the website. He is also working on a newsletter to the public via the website. He has presented his budget proposal to the Friends of the Library for the new fiscal year. Lastly, he stated that circulation at the new library has increased tremendously. FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY Mrs. Eckhardt reported that the Friends would be holding elections at their next meeting. They will also be discussing the proposed budget. She also stated that there is a membership drive going on. Lastly, she stated that the Friends would be planning to meet at different library locations, if possible. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Library Advisory Board, Mrs. Lewis moved, seconded by Ms. Musci and carded unanimously, that the meeting be adjourned. ~me: 3:10 p.m. LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD Wednesday,October 2~ 2002 Call to Order Approval of Minutes Literacy Report - Verizon Grant Report of Officers Communications a. Written b. Personal Unfinished Business 1. Employee of the Month (Oct. & Nov.) 2. Immokalee Library Construction New Business General Considerations Director's Report Report of the Friends Adjournment NOTICE OF MEETING & AGENDA 161 1 COLLIER COUNTY HISPANIC AFFAIRS ADVISORY BOARD WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2002 7:00 P.M. '" County Commission Meeting Room _ Turner Building (Building Fl, Third Floor _ Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail East ~':" ~ Naples, Florida. 34112 NOTICES Public comments will be limited to 5 minutes unless permission for additional, time is granted by the Chairman. Colli~r County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commi.~ioners) before h~ Board of County Comroissioncrs and i~ advisory boards, register with the Clerk to file Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. AGENDA II. IH. IV. 7:00 P.M. Meeting called to order and determination of quorum.. Approval of minutes of the September 26, 2002 meeting. Determination. of excusal of absences. New Business. A. Board discussion regarding .HAAB functions, priorities and ordinance. B. 800 p.m. - Discussion with Commissioner. James N. Coletta, Chairman of thc Collier County Board of County Commissioners re issues a£fecting the Hispanic Community and the function, of the Hispanic Affairn Advisory Board. Public Comments. Meeting adjourns. / Fiala V' r , ,,, Carter ~ v~'/ 16 ! Henning ~ Coyle v/ Coletta v/ - WORKFORCE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE - AGENDA October 14~ 2002 - 3:30 p.m. Board of County Commissioners' Conference Room 2. 3. 4. Call to Order Approval of September 30, 2002 Minutes. Discussion on Housing Development Corp - Barbara Cacchione Continued discussion on Inclusionary Zoning (IZ). a. Confirm consensus on size of project that is affected. b. At what stage of existing projects does IZ kick in? i. Exceptions. c. Percent required to be affordable and mix of affordable. d. Buyout provisions. i. Buy out money. ii. Buy out with off-site location. Review of staff report on LDC amendments. Initial discussion of Linkage fees (if time permits). MS/ksh Misc. Cortes: Date: ~ item# I i Copies To: ,~nnlng 7748301 PUB INFO Collier County Government Department of Public Information 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (941) 774-8999 Contact: PAGE 161 1 Lavah Hetzel Public Information 774-8373 Ol/Ol Oct. 14, 2002 FOR.IMMEDIATE ~LEASE BAYSHOREtGATEWAY TRIANGLE LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD WORKSHOP MEETING Monday, October 21, 6 p.m. Community Development & Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Conference Room E Agenda 1. Roll Call 2. Adoption of Agenda 3. Announcement~ 4. Review and Discussion of Mini-Triangle Redevelopment Proposal. 5. Citizen Comments 6. Adjournment Note: All meetings are publicly noticed in the W. Harmon Turner Building (Administration Building F) and on the CRA website. Please call Thomas Tomerl.in, Principal Planner, at (239) 659-5752 if you have any questions about the meeting. In accordance with the American.~ with Disabilities .dct, persons needing assistance to participate in any oftheseproceedings should contact Thomas Tomerlin at least 48 ho~trs priOr:t~ ~g~th~. I=i~la Carter ..-" Henning Cotetta MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD Naples FL, October 2' 2002 October 2, 2002 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Value Adjustment Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m. in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Jim Coletta, (County Commissioner) Donna Fiala (County Commissioner) Fred Coyle Anne Goodnight (School Board) Linda Abbott (School Board) ALSO PRESENT: Abe Skinner, Property Appraiser; Bruce D. Stephens, Sally Garrett, Doug Gourum, John Hamblen, Dan Eby, and Don Wegner, Property Appraiser's office; Heidi Ashton and Ellen Chadwell, Assistant County Attorney's. I~isc. Corres: Date: ~ Copies To: Pagel VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA OCTOBER 2, 2002 161 I me ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN (Said Chairman must be a member of the Collier County Commission) MOTION to adopt RESOLUTION 2002-01 (VAB) relating to filing fees for the Value Adjustment board Petitions. Chairman authorized to sign. PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR THE FOLLLOWING PROPERTY VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD PETITIONS: 9~00 A.M.- HOMESTEAD PETITIONS HP-26 Zeb Billings,225 4th Ave. North(T3 Blk.25-Lots 13-19) LATE-HP-27 Andrea Lissette,3381 Erick Lk. Dr. (Lot5,Regent Pk Villas) AGRICULTURAL PETITIONS A-1 A-2 Gregory M. Morris, representing Colonial Bank, 27200 Riverview Center Blvd., Bonita Springs, (s/w corner of Rattlesnake Hammock and Collier Blvd.) Gregory M. Morris, representing Alanda, Ltd., 12800 University Drive #240, Ft. Myers, (s/w corner of Rattlesnake Hammock and Collier Blvd.) A-4 Antonio M. Longo, 6729 Harwick Ct. Naples, Unit 4, Golden Gate Estates) (Tract 104, 10~00 A.M. - PERSONAL PROPERTY PETITIONS PP-1 PP-2 PP-3 PP-4 Sun Trust Banks, 3315 Davis Blvd. Sun Trust Banks, 2420 Vanderbilt Beach Road Sun Trust Banks, 3201 Tamiami Trail North Sun Trust Banks, 350 5tn Ave. South. PP-5 Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. PP-6 TP-50 Tri-County Realty (Personal Property in equipment and supplies, 1295 Wildwood Lakes Blvd.) Tri-County Realty - Apartments PP-9-16, 18&19 PP-21-26 Verizon Wireless - Kevin Snow PP-32-44 Burr Wolf,LP (Bank of America) PP-45 AT & T Wireless (Ernst & Young, LLP-Vincent Cheng) 11~00 A.M. - TAX PETITIONS TP-1 Paul C. Daniels. 2345 Clipper Way, Coconut River, Unit 1 TP-2 Karen J. Kurtz-Purdie, 4860 14th St N.E., Naples, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 59S TP-3 Paul W. Sullivan, 1330 Caxambas Court, Marco Island TP-6 Glenn & Una Irene Youell, 1112 Ridge St. Rosemary Heights Add., LB1 & W~ of L83 (Petitioner will not be Present) TP-7 Colleen O'Connor, 3624 Collee Ct., Naples, Fi. TP-8 Michael & Geraldine Silverstein, 2517 Spicebush Lane TP-10 Lidi Eberhardt, Marco Beach, Unit 7, Block 206, Lot 2 Lunch Recess 12 - 1~00 P.M. 1:00 P.M. TP-14 Jeffrey L. Mandler, Esq. (Villas of Capri, Plantation, Unit 2, Tract B) TP-22 Francisco Pinho, Marco Beach, Unit 4, Block 129, Lot 5 TP-25 James A. Lagrippe, 1450 Gulfstar Dr., Windstar Cntry Club 2:00 P.M. TP-36 TP-37 TP-38 Robert Ribar c/o Stallings-Ribar Group, Robert Ribar c/o Stallings-Ribar Group, Robert Ribar c/o Stallings-Ribar Group, (656 Elm Street) (Marco Island) (Marco Island) TP-39 TP-40 Aaron Bilton c/o Flanagan,Bilton, (M&I Building) Aaron Bilton c/o Flanagan,Bilton, (M&I Building) TP-45 TP-46 TP-47 TP-48 TP-49 Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz, LLP, Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz, LLP, Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz, LLP, Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz, LLP, (Golden Gate Est., Unit 44W) Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz, LLP, (Tamiami Ford, Inc.) (Tamiami Ford, Inc.) (Tamiami Ford, Inc.) (Tamiami Ford, Inc.) (Tamiami Ford, Inc.) Progress Commercial Park, Lot 4 3: O0 P.M. 161 1' TP-55 TP-56 Darrin Mitchell, Whistler's Green. Naples (Petitioner will not be Present) Darrin Mitchell, Whistler's Cove, Naples (Petitioner will not be present) TP-58 Jozsef Kelemen, 516 12th Ave. S., (Gardenia Court, Inc., Condo, Apt 516 TP-59 Adam & Margaret Scheer, 5949 Amberwood Dr. (Pelican Strand, Replat #6, Tract 10, Lot 3) TP-61 Michael Schaefers,Marco Beach, Unit 7, Blk. 195, Lot 14 (Adirondack) TP-62 Raymond Brooks, 1260 Martinique Ct. Marco Island, (Marco Beach, Units 1 & 4 Replat, Blk. 123, Lot 26 TP-65 TP-66 TP-67 TP-68 TP-69 TP-71 TP-72 TP-73 Easley, McCaleb & Assoc Easley, McCaleb & Assoc Easley, McCaleb & Assoc Easley, McCaleb & Assoc Easley, McCaleb & Assoc Easley, McCaleb & Assoc Easley, McCaleb & Assoc Easley, McCaleb & Assoc (Pine Ridge Crossing) (Courthouse Shadows) (Courthouse Shadows - Shop) (Longhorn of Naples) (Northgate Place Apts.) (Plaza on 3rd St.) (land) (Plaza on 3rd St. Shop) (Plaza at 1170 3rd St. -- Shop) 4:00 P.M. TP-75 Steven & Susan Myhelick, 145 Conners Ave., Vanderbilt Beach TP-76 John Dougherty, 560 S. Collier Blvd. (Hilton Resort) TP-79 TP-80 TP-81 Henry Halle, Sr. Henry Halle, Sr. Henry Halle, Sr. 1046 12th Ave. N. 1046 12th Ave. N. 1046 12th Ave. N. (Self Storage) (Apartment Bldg.) TP-82 Dr. Susan Lee, Marco Bch Unit 4 Blk 127 Lot 10 TP-85 William Koupa, 680 Solana Ct,Marco Bch U 11 Blk 360 Lot 16 TP-88 Douglas Cook, 796 Starboard Dr,Moorings U6 Blk F Lot 12 TP-89 APF Develop. II LLC,5121 Castello Dr, Ste 2, (Hangars @ Naples Airport-Units 703,719,723,721) Recess and reconvene on October 3, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 9:00AM October 2, 2002 161 1 II. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN -Mr. Coyle made a motion to elect Mr. Coletta as the Chairman, it was seconded by Donna Fiala, All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously (5-0). HI. MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2002-01 (VAB) - Relating to filing fees for the Value Adjustment board Petitions. Chairman authorized to sign. -Donna Fiala made a motion to approve the resolution, it was seconded by Anne Goodnight, all were in favor the motion passed unanimously (5-0). PUBLIC HEARING -Heidi Ashton, Assistant County Attorney, stated that on the homestead petitions and the agricultural petitions, two issues needed to be addressed. Whether there is a finding of extenuating circumstances to justify a late petition and whether the eligibility criteria has been met (this is only applicable to some of them). She added that with all petitions, (as on memo), there is a presumption that favor's the property appraiser's decision is presumed correct. With respect to the tax petitions, the burden to overcome the presumption of correctness is for the property owner to establish; the appraiser must have considered the criteria in section 193.011 Florida Statutes, (copy given to board). Or the burden is to establish that the property appraiser's assessment is arbitrarily based on appraisal practices which are different from appraisal practices generally applied by the property appraiser to comparable property with the same class and within the same county. The property owner has to establish that the property appraiser failed to meet those two criteria, by use of clear and convincing evidence. -Mr. Skinner stated they have considered each position and they feel they were correct in their appraisals. 9:00am - HOMESTEAD PETITIONS 1) HP-26 Zeb Billings, 225 4~h Ave. North (T3 Blk. 25 -Lots 13-19) -Jane and Zeb Billings. Jane Billings stated the board had their letter in their possession. She requested to hand out a second letter that stated what they wanted to say. (Mr. Skinner stated he had no objections to this after he reviewed it - he added Page2 that technically they did not have to allow this.) Jane Billings read the letter. It stated that since their first letter they had done more research and found ads for 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002. They estimated approximately 25 ads have appeared in the Naples Daily News about Homestead Exemptions during these four years. She added that the adds to not show the 3% assessment cap savings or the CPI assessment cap. She added that on the County Appraiser's website, these two items are not explained or mentioned. She asked if they were correct in assuming that the Save our Homes exempt value and the CPI assessment cap are one in the same. (Mr. Skinner explained that the Homestead entitles you to a $25,000 tax exemption on the property, and the Save Our Homes is something that would be after you apply for Homestead. He added that in the papers, legally, they are not required to advertise that, this is a courtesy they advertise Homestead. He stated that added the Save Our Homes into the ad was a good suggestion but legally they did not have to.) Jane Billings went on to explain that because they were not aware, they have overpaid their taxes by $23,770.08 and that without the 1.6% CPI assessment for 2002 they will have overpaid $4,1142.75. She explained that this is based on the fact that they applied for Homestead in 1996, but because they were not aware of the other two savings, they did not sign up till 2001. Because they felt that they did not receive full disclosure, she stated they believe they should at least receive the 1.6% cap assessment for 2002 as well the $25,000 deduction. She added that they still would have overpaid by $34,160.00 and that they will continue to overpay in the future years in the amount of $10,394.00 but they will live with this. -Commissioner Coyle asked about the application for Homestead in December and how it would affect this years taxes. -Mr. Skinner stated that this is not a unique situation, that people have not applied for Homestead not knowing about amendment 10. Mr. Skinner stated that legally they cannot go back and apply amendment 10 and homestead in retrospect. This case was applied for last year for 2002, this sets the base, in the following years the CPI will kick in, but it has to be after the base, so it will not kick in till 2003. -Anne Goodnight explained that she felt they were asking for Save our Homes, which has nothing to do with their present job, and that due to the limitations, they can not go back retrospectively. -Linda Abbott asked if there was anyway they could, more officially, notify the public about these items, so that this problem is avoided in the future. Page3 October 2, 2002 -Mr. Skinner stated that legally they do not have to, but this is a good decision and1 since they are here to serve the public they will take this into consideration, to notify the public of amendment I 0 and what it can do for them. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial based upon the fact that extenuating circumstances do not exist which justify the exemption, it was seconded by Anne Goodnight, all were in favor, the motion passed unanimously (5-0). 2) HP - 27 Andrea Lissette, 3381 Erick Lk. Dr. (Lot 5, Regent Pk Villas). -The petitioner was not present. -It was explained that, according to the information received by the County Appraiser's Office, Miss Lissette moved into this property in 2000, she believed that her previous homestead would be transferred, she inherited the homestead in 2000 from the previous owner, she was mailed a letter in December of 2000 advising her to file for Homestead by March 1, 2001. She never came in to apply. Miss Lisette's letter stated that she went once to the wrong office and forgot to go again to the correct office, she stated that she was told she had to wait till January to apply. The County Appraiser's Office is unaware of how she came by this, stating that they take applications 12 mos. out of the year. Last week Miss Lissette filed an application for 2003 and filed a petition regarding her 2002, it was filed a day late. -Mr. Coyle made a motion to deny, it was seconded by Donna Fiala, all were in favor, the motion passed unanimously (5-0). AGRICULTURAL PETITIONS A-1 Gregory M. Moms, representing Colonial Bank, 272000 Riverview Center Blvd., Bonita Springs, (S/W comer of Rattlesnake Hammock and Collier Blvd.) A-2 Gregory M. Moms, representing Alanda, Ltd., 12800 University Drive #240, Ft. Myers, (S/W comer or Rattlesnake Hammock and Collier Blvd) 1) A-1 & A-2 were heard together. Gregory Moms stated that he was going to address A-1 & A-2 together, since essentially they are the same piece of property. He stated that the property is -40 acres on the comer of 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock. The property has been under Agricultural exemption since the early 1980's. He explained that they were in the process of renewing the current exemption and entered into a new cattle lease on December 10, 2001 with Perry Johnson. On February 20th, they Page4 submitted there agricultural exemption to Dan Eby. The petition was submitted in a timely fashion. Mr. Moms explained that sometime in March, Perry Johnson passed away and at the time, they were unaware of his death, they also were not notified of the removal of the cattle. In early June Mr. Eby notified them that the cattle had been removed. On June 26, immediately after they were informed, they entered into a new lease, put cattle back onto the property, and repaired the fences. On August 28~', Mr. Moms met with John Hamblen and Mr. Eby, he explained the circumstances of Mr. Johnson's demise and discussed the history of the property. Mr. Morris stated that he was informed, that in prior years the exemption on the Colonial Bank had been removed. He therefore stated that he was withdrawing the exemption on A-1. He added that due to the circumstances, he believed there were extenuating circumstance, and they would like the agricultural exemption on A-2 be reinstated. Heidi Ashton clarified that he had filed timely for a late filing, it was therefore not a matter of a late petition, the issue before the board was whether they were eligible for the agricultural exemption. Mr. Humble stated that the property had been under scrutiny since early 2001, before these people purchased it. Mr. Corothers had a small cattle operation and a nursery, originally on this property. During inspections, they found that the nursery was no longer on the property, there were no livestock to be found, and the fences were down (from June of 2001 to April of 2002). He explained that in 2001 they sent a concern letter to Eagle Trust, stating these conditions. They removed it in January 2002 since it was not being utilized as it was supposed to. Mr. Coyle asked if the property was a PUD, zoned commercial. Mr. Humble informed him that the entire property was zoned commercial. Mr. Moms explained that he agreed and explained that the property was not platted, there was no development there, and no development order. He added that they were unaware of the letter sent to Eagle Trust, and had they known of Mr. Johnson's demise, they would have corrected the situation sooner. Mr. Coyle asked when Mr. Johnson passed. Mr. Morris stated he believed that it was in March of 2002. Mr. Coyle added that as early as October 2001 it was stated that there were no cattle on the property. Mr. Morris stated when they entered into contract with Mr. Johnson in December of 2001, they believe that there were cattle on the property. Heidi Ashton added that under FL Statute 193.461, the criteria to be Page5 October 2, 2002 considered was whether or not it is a bona fide agricultural use, the length oftim~e it had been utilized, if the use has been continuous, the purchase price paid for the size, whether efforts have been made to care sufficiently and adequately for land in accordance with accepted commercial agricultural practices, whether it is under lease, the lease terms and conditions, and any other circumstances that become applicable. Mr. Morris replied that the property has been under agricultural use since the early 1980's, it has been in continuous use for 20 years, and he believes that they demonstrated good management practices. He added that previously Mr. Caruthers had leased the property for agricultural use, when he passed, Mr. Johnson began to lease the property. He explained that it was always there intention to use the property for agricultural purposes. Mr. Coyle asked Mr. Skinner what the policy was for property that has been rezoned PUD. Mr. Skinner informed him he believed this was a way to prohibit someone from getting a PUD and then applying for an agricultural exemption. He does not grant this "in-house", but if historically they have had cattle on a property and then they got a PUD, as long as they had continuous agricultural use, he would grant the agricultural exemption. He explained in this case the fences were down, there were no cattle and no nursery, therefore it was not ready for cattle, therefore they did not grant the exemption. Mr. Coyle asked for clarification of FL Statute under section 193.461 subparagraph 4A3. Mr. Humble stated that the agricultural classification went into effect in 1972. He added that this property had continuous use as agricultural until June 2001, it had a gap until at least April 2002. Mr. Coyle stated that his concern was, this section of the law left them with no latitude to make a decision. Heidi Ashton stated there was no case law for example, but it was current law and he was correct in what the law stated. Mr. Moms stated that there was a lapse but it was due to the extenuating circumstances of Mr. Johnson's and Mr. Carruther's deaths, and they corrected the situation as soon as the became aware of it. Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial on A-2, because there were no extenuating circumstances that justified anything but denial. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. Heidi Ashton questioned the issue of eligibility and read the factors to be considered: the length of time the land has been so utilized, whether the use has been continuous, the purchase price paid for size, whether an indicated effort has 61 Page6 been made to care sufficiently and adequately in accordance with accepted commercial agricultural practices, whether the land is under lease, and such other factors that may from time to time become applicable. Mr. Coletta added to his motion that the land has not been in continuous agricultural use. All were in favor of the motion, it passed unanimously 5-0. Mr. Morris then stated that he formally withdrew the petition for A-1 because the agricultural exemption had been removed prior to his petition. 2) A-4 Antonio M. Longo, 6729 Harwick Ct. Naples, (Tract 104, Unit 4, Golden Gate Estates). -Mr. Longo stated that he has about 5 acres on Golden Gate Blvd. He explained that last year it was $1064.00 and this year it was $2054.00, he asked why there was such a large difference. -Mr. Humble stated that they never received an application. He explained that historically it had been a small citrus grove, the petitioner purchased the property in February of 2001, they were mailed a new application, but the county appraiser never received it and therefore withdrew the agricultural exemption. -Mr. Coletta asked if it was and still is a working citrus grove. Mr. Skinner replied yes, and that they had no problem with it qualifying, the only problem was that they didn't receive the application for new ownership until September of 2002 and it was due March 1st, 2002. Mr. Longo stated his accountant sent the application in late. -Mr. Skinner stated that they would have no problem with granting the exemption, if the petition had been filed in a timely fashion. -Mr. Coletta stated he believed that there were some extenuating circumstances. -Anne Goodnight stated that the application stated the family was caring for an ill parent and wanted to know if this is why they filed late. Mr. Skinner stated that he believed this could be extenuating circumstances. -Mr. Coyle made a motion to approve the exemption, it was seconded by Anne Goodnight. -Mr. Coyle stated that the illness of Mr. Longo's mother and his trip to Italy served as extenuating circumstances, he added that the property remains in continuous use with no changes. Anne Goodnight stated she seconded this as part of the motion. -All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously (5-0). Page7 A five minute recess was taken until 10am. PERSONAL PROPERTY PETITIONS October 2, 2002 161 10:00AM 1) PP-1, PP-2, PP-3, & PP-4 were all heard together. PP-1 Sun Trust Bans, 3315 Davis Blvd. PP-2 Sun Trust Banks, 2420 Vanderbilt Beach Road PP-3 Sun Trust Banks, 3201 Tamiami Trail North PP-4 Sun Trust Banks, 350 5~ Ave. South -The petitioner was not present. -Douglas Gourum, Director of Special Assessments and Tangible Personal Proper for the Property Appraisers Office, stated that he did not know what Sun Trust Banks argument was, they had not filed any paperwork other than the petition requesting a lower value. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial based on lack of sufficient material for rejection. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. -Heidi Ashton stated the board should do a separate motion for each. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-1, based on lack of sufficient material for rejection. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-2, based on lack of sufficient material for rejection. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-3, based on lack of sufficient material for rejection. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-4, based on lack of sufficient material for rejection. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously 5-0. 2) PP-5 Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. -The petitioner was not present. Mr. Gourum stated that the petitioner had provided them with a letter, he read this into the record: Page8 October 2, 2002 "Dear Collier County Property Appraiser, 16[ Enclosed please find the rendition of property for the aforementioned company. Kindly note that on January 28t~, 2002 Global Crossings US based Companies filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result the issuance of final 2001 financial statements has been delayed. Significant among the reasons of the delay is a proposed write-down of fixed assets, which is to be reflected in the financial statements for the companies as of December 31, 2001. Included in the financial statements will be a massive write-down, i.e. projected to be greater than 75% in value of the world wide assets of Global Crossing, which is being prepared in accordance with provisions of SFAS # 121 .Unfortunately, because of the bankruptcy, the actual amount of the write-off will not be know for another few weeks, as such, we are filing our rendition for your jurisdiction, projecting a write- down at 50%, something that is a conservative position and is being used so as to timely file this return. We will be sending to you the actual write-down as soon as it becomes available." -(A copy of this letter was not provided to the court reporter). -Mr. Gourum stated that the letter was dated April 29th and that they have not received anything from them since the aforementioned letter. He added that the fact that Global Crossings is in bankruptcy has no bearing on the 2001 value that they have in place. He explained that a listing of assets (an accounting function) does not mean it will cause a loss in value of items of tangible personal property. -Mr. Coyle stated he made the same observation and that this is not a defense. -Mr. Coyle made a motion for denial because there is no linkage between assessment and write-down, it was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously 5-0. 1 3) PP-6 Tri-County Realty (Personal Property in equipment and supplies, 1295 Wildwood Lakes Blvd.) -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Gourum stated that this was the Enclave at Naples. He added that they have never been contacted by the Enclave to know what the position was. He explained that they petitioned a value of $550,000 and the value of the County Appraiser's office was $699,401. Page9 October 2, 2002 161 -Mr. Coyle recommended denial because the presumption of correctness by the assessor and no evidence to the contrary. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously 5-0. 4) PP-50 Tri-County Realty - Apartments -The petitioner was not present. -Bruce Stephens, stated that they have received nothing in the way of evidence. He added that this is the same apartment complex. -Mr. Coyle made a motion for denial because of the presumption for correctness of the assessor and lack of evidence to the contrary. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously 5-0. 5) PP-9, PP-10, PP-11, PP-12, PP-13, PP-14, PP-15, PP-16, PP-18, PP-19, PP-21, PP-22, PP-23, PP-24, PP-25, & PP-26 were heard together. -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Gourum explained that this was Verizon Wireless, they had multiple millage areas throughout the county and it is just an allocation of value from our office to these other millage areas. He added that they were dealing with cellular tower installations and storefronts. He explained that Verizon Wireless's argument, essentially, was they do not believe the cost evaluation tables that are provided by the FL Department of Revenue are accurate. He stated the accuracy rate was determined to be between 0.96 & 1.04, therefore they are fight around 100% fair market value, where they are supposed to be. He explained that Verizon Wireless's argument deals with assets removed from the site and sold at auction. He further explained that his office is dealing with highest and best use when the tangible property is in place and being used in a business, which is a different value than liquidation, salvage, or market value removed. He added they feel there tables are correct. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-9, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property appraisers office. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-10, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property appraisers office. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. Pagel0 -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-11, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property apprmsers office. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were ~n favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-12, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property apprmsers office. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were ~n favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-13, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property appraisers office. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were ~n favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-14, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property apprmsers office. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-15, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property appraisers office. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, it passed unammously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-16, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property apprmsers office. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were ~n favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-18, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property apprmsers office. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, it passed unammously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-19, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property apprmsers office. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were xn favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-21, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property apprmsers office. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were ~n favor, it passed unammously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-22, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property apprmsers office. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-23, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property apprmsers office. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. Pagell October 2, 2002 -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-24, based upon the fact of presu n of correctness of the property appraisers office. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-25, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property appraisers office. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-26, based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of the property appraisers office. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, it passed unanimously 5-0. 6) PP-32, PP-33, PP-34, PP-35, PP-36, PP-37, PP-38, PP-39, PP-40, PP-41, PP-42, PP-43, & PP-44 were heard together. Burr Wolf, LP (Bank of America) -Scott Piper, stated that they were all Bank of America. The issue was they do not believe that the Collier County Appraiser's Office is using economic life factors in there depreciation schedules, which truly reflect what the market is. He provide a handout to the board, (copy not provided to court reporter). He stated that in another county they had multiple years, 1997-2001, tied up into lawsuits, where they settled with the property appraiser's office. They settled in April at something less than 55%, the property appraiser's office split the difference with them. He stated that either he can sit down with the property appraiser and go through the information that they have had, so far, used for past court cases, and come to some sort of compromise. Or they will get an appraisal and file this case to court if they lose the petition today. He added that they really do not believe that the economic life factors, especially in the first couple of years, are indicative of what the assets are worth. He stated that within months computer equipment is worth half of what was originally paid for it. He explained that currently, Bank of America adopted lease program for their computers, rather than owning, this is to avoid depreciation. He showed that a company, ASI, did a market study for them and they faxed this study in prior to the meeting. -Mr. Coletta referenced in the handout, a section that stated the appraisal was $354,170, and the petitioner's estimation of the fair market value of this property is $21,940. He asked why the numbers are so far apart, (this was petition PP-35). Pagel2 Oct°ber 2, 20~ 6[ -Mr. Piper explained the difference was due to residual value in computer assets. He explained that there was a value of $128,000 in old computer assets at this location, they are using a present value factor of 7% for 1997, 5% for 1995, 1% for assets 1991 and prior. He then explained on the $86,000 in assets discussed they are currently using 1% and the property appraiser's office is using -18%-28% and this is why the numbers are so skewed. -Mr. Coletta asked Mr. Skinner if this company was picked out from any other company, with regards to the way this situation is being handled. Mr. Skinner replied No. Mr. Coletta asked how they explained the difference. Mr. Skinner stated they are using state guidelines for depreciation from the Department of Revenue. Mr. Gourum added that under FL Statute 193.011, the first factor talks about the present cash value. He explained that this is what the "hat is hanging on" in this study, the problem with the study, is it fails to consider the second criteria, which is highest and best use. Highest and best use is when the assets are in the banking and earning money, which is different then selling them on the market. He explained that on PP- 35, the original tax return stated that everything had been disposed of. One of the field men went out to verify and stated that the same stuff that was previously there was still currently there and being used. Mr. Gourum stated that they are using the original cost figures reported to them by Bank of America on their assets. -Mr. Coletta asked Mr. Piper if he was aware that Bank of America declared that their assets had been sold off and it was shown that they weren't. Mr. Piper stated that he was not aware of it, that he didn't file the returns, that someone else would file the return, and if their was any evaluation issues remain it goes to a different department. He asked them to keep in mind that they follow returns for 1000's of places. Mr. Coletta stated he dropped this particular question. -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny this claim (PP-32), based upon the fact of presumption of correctness of behalf of the property appraiser. -Mr. Skinner asked Mr. Piper about the reference of going to court, and if he had the authority to make this decision. Mr. Piper stated that he, personally, wouldn't go to court over 12 petitions. -Hiedi Ashton requested the board to make some findings with respect to whether or not the property appraiser has failed to consider the criteria in FL Statute section 193.011. Mr. Coletta added the language to his motion. Pagel3 October 2, 2002 -Mr. Coyle asked Mr. Piper if he would sell the CPU, originally bought for 161 $3,352,000, for $10,908, which is the current value Mr. Piper gave for the equipment. Mr. Piper stated he would because that it all it is worth on the market today. Mr. Piper stated it would have to be replaced with a new piece of equipment, since this is an old piece of technology. He added that the issue is value & use versus value & exchange. He explained that the mason he believes that the people don't challenge the issue, because it is cheaper to pay the tax, then to go to court. -Donna Fiala seconded the motion on PP-32. -Heidi Ashton stated there needed to be a second finding as well as to whether the property appraiser's assessment was based on appraisal practices generally applied to like properties. Mr. Coletta made this part of his motion as well; that this is based on accepted practices in the state of FL. He added that the petitioner has not presented evidence that shows that the property appraiser had neglect in his original findings. Mr. Coletta added to his motions that he found it an acceptable answer when Mr. Skinner stated he treated this business in the same respects as all others. Donna Fiala Seconded the motion with all the additions of language. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-33, for the same reasons listed in the denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-34, for the same reasons listed in the denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-35, for the same reasons listed in the denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-36, for the same reasons listed in the denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-37, for the same reasons listed in the denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. Pagel4 October 2, 2002 -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-38, for the same reasons listed in the~t6 1 denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-39, for the same reasons listed in the denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-40, for the same reasons listed in the denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial ofPP-41, for the same reasons listed in the denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-42, for the same reasons listed in the denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-43, for the same reasons listed in the denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of PP-44, for the same reasons listed in the denial of PP-32, it was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 7) PP-45 AT&T Wireless (Emst& Young, LLP-Vincent Cheng). -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Gourum stated that they filed a petition and never contacted his office. He explained that AT&T Wireless has the same situation as Verizon, and that they have never contacted his office to state what they are disgruntled about. -Heidi Ashton asked that if there was a statement in the petition, that it be read to the board. -Anne Goodnight made a motion to deny PP45 due to the fact that the petitioner has not shown evidence that the property appraiser has not shown the presumption of correctness. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously 5-0. Page15 October 2, 2002 11:00AM - TAX PETITIONS 161 -The first petitioner was present so they began the tax petitions at 10:50am. 1) TP-1 Paul C. Daniels. 2345 Clipper Way, Coconut River, Unit 1. -Mr. Daniels stated this is his rental property, and in one years time the property value was raised $51,000. He disagrees with this. He stated he wrote a letter to the Property Appraiser's Office, agreeing to sell the property for $190,000 if they would like to buy it. The house was built in the early "70's" and it is 1500 square feet. He added that it is infested with the white footed ant, and it is impossible to get rid of them, he believes this decreases the value. He checked and the land is valued at $120,000 because it is on a canal, but it takes an hour to get into the canal. -Bruce Stephens, with the Property Appraiser's Office, stated that the petitioner has not provided any evidence to indicate that their value was incorrect. He provided the board with a packet that showed the property and comparable properties. He stated anything on a canal, the properties have increased. He explained that the petitioner is not Homestead and that some of the questionable neighbors are Homesteaded. He stated that the property is currently being rented, and he believes the appraisal is accurate because he took into account that the development is not an income producing type development. -Mr. Daniels stated that he has property on Two Door Court, he had it appraised this year for sale, and it was appraised at $205,000. He then stated that the Property Appraiser's Office had raised this from $146,000 to $161,000, he then asked if just because it was on the water, they then had to pay an astronomical amount of money. -Mr. Stephens explained that sale #1 and sale #2 were not on the canal. Sale #1 sold for $175,000 and sale #2 sold for #172,000. He explained that when you look at comparables #3, #5, &#6 they go over the $300,000 mark because they are on the canal. -Mr. Daniels stated the buildings around him are much nicer, newer, and larger. -Mr. Stephens stated that comp #6 was built in 1989 and it sold for $450,000; they have close to the same square footage. He does not believe their value exceeds the fair market value. -Mr. Skinner stated the house alone, according to the petitioner, was valued at $121,000. Pagel6 October 2, 2002 -Mr. Coyle recommended denial due to the presumption of correctness o~e'~ I assessor and a lack of evidence otherwise. It was seconded by Donna Fiala, all were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. No other petitioners scheduled at 1 lam were present at this time (10:55am) so a ten minute recess was taken. 2) TP-2 Karen J. Kurtz-Purdie, 4860 14th St. N.E., Naples, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 59S -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated they had the property appraised at a little over $134,000. He explained that the petitioner has a recorded deed, where she paid $132,000. When they investigated it, she had owned the property in Golden Gates Estates and decided to build the house. She "quick-claimed" the property over to Holiday Builders, they then built the house and sold it back to her for the cost of the house, therefore the recorded deed was for the cost of the house, not including the land. The Property Appraiser's Office appraised the house at $190,000. He explained the petitioner also had the house appraised and sent it in to their department, the appraisal was more than their original value and did not include the pool. He added that nothing the petitioner has presented changes their position on what the market value is, he showed comparable supportive sales in the packet provided. -Mr. Coyle made a motion to deny based on the fact that there is no evidence to overcome the presumption of correctness by the assessor, it was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 3) TP-3 Paul W. Sullivan, 1330 Caxambas Court, Marco Island -The petitioner was not present. -Bruce Stephens stated that he had communicated with Mr. Sullivan via email. Mr. Sullivan informed him that he could not be present until after the 21 st of October. Mr. Stephens stated he had just sent an email informing Mr. Sullivan that after the hearing, when he is in town, he will meet with him to review all of the evidence provided to the board. -Linda Abbott asked if he was simply disputing the information. Mr. Stephens replied yes. Pagel7 -Mr. Coyle asked if he had provided any information at all. Mr. Stephens stated that with the petition, the petitioner attached a note comparing assessments with other properties, but size, location, and area were different. -Donna Fiala asked if he was Homesteaded. Mr. Stephens informed her that this was the first year he was Homesteaded. -Mr. Coletta made a motion of denial based upon the presumption of correctness of the property appraiser, it was seconded by Anne Goodnight, All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously 5-0. 4) TP-6 Glenn & Una Irene Youell, 1112 Ridge St. Rosemary Heights Add., L81 & W1/2 of L83 -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated that the only information the petitioner gave them was a complaint in the increase of value. He explained his office showed six comparable sales in the area that more than support their value. -Mr. Coyle moved to Deny because the petitioner failed to produce any evidence which could overcome the presumption of correctness for the assessor, it was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5- 0. 5) TP-7 Colleen O'Connor, 3624 Collee Ct., Naples, FL -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated this is virtually the same situation, the petitioner gave no information to dispute the value. He stated the petitioner did mention that there was a sandbar behind her house that prevented her from using the water in similar ways as her neighbors. The Property Appraiser's Office did take this into account and appraised her property lower due to this fact. -Donna Fiala made a motion to deny based on insufficient evidence. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 6) TP-8 Michael & Geraldine Silverstein, 2517 Spicebush Lane -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated they believed they could support the value without any difficulty and the petitioner has not provided any information. He stated the Pagel8 petitioner gave calculations that were unclear and in comparison with his neighbors who were Homestead, he was not. -Mr. Skinner stated that at times people look at the capped properties to compare, he added that shortly legislation is to be made that will mandate a lawyer to state if a property is capped or not, and allow the people to know what the taxes could be, he hopes this passes. -Donna Fiala made a motion to deny due to insufficient evidence from the petitioner. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 7) TP-10 Lidi Eberhardt, Marco Beach, Unit 7, Block 206, Lot 2 -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated that the petitioner mentioned some sales, they did look at these, but some were not even the same area. He stated that there are a few petitions in this same area of Marco because they are close to the Fire Department. He added that there were four comparable sales that justified the house and land value on this property. -Donna Fiala made a motion to deny based on lack of sufficient evidence. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5- 0. A lunch recess was taken at 11:20am-1:00pm I:00PM (Linda Abbot and Anne Goodnight not currently present) 1) TP-14 Jeffrey L. Mandler, Esq. (Villas of Capri, Plantation, Unit 2, Tract B) -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated that the petitioner showed nothing to overcome their assessment. The committee reviewed the packet provided. This is a low-income project. -Mr. Coyle asked that their appraisal was actually below the evaluation established by the income method. Mr. Stephens stated that this was correct. Mr. Stephens added that the low-income projects throughout the state are in lawsuits over taxes. He added that for this property, the actual cost to build was $17million and it is Pagel9 October 2, 2002 appraised for $11,300,000. Part of the statute states they must recognize the income of low-income property, and this is done by his office. -Mr. Skinner stated that in income producing properties, income is only one of the issues they must consider. -Mr. Coyle made a motion to deny on the basis that the petitioner has provided no evidence to overcome the presumption of accuracy of the appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. -Heidi Ashton apologized and stated the motion must be redone when one of the school board members arrived. -At 1:1 Opm Linda Abbot arrived and reviewed the information. -The motion was recalled, all were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0; Anne Goodnight was not present. 2) TP-22 Francisco Pinho, Marco Beach, Unit 4, Block 129, Lot 5 -Mr. Pinho stated that the county assessed his house for $871,530. He stated the house is 27 years old. In 1986, when he purchased the property, he paid $340,000 plus he has spent $43,000 on it since. It is his opinion that the house is not worth what it was assessed for. He showed photos to the board of the house. (Mr. Skinner reviewed the photos first and stated he had no objections of them being shown to the board). -Mr. Stephens stated that the comparables all have similar views of the Gulf. He explained that sale #1 was a vacant lot and sold for $807,000. He also showed comparable photographs in the packet. He informed the board that this is a very transitional part of Marco, some areas have lower sell rates, he added that people are buying the land and tearing the houses down. He added that in some of the cases today he shows 2002 sales. He explained the assessment did not use 2002 sales but they are shown today just to show that the market is not necessarily going down. -Mr. Coyle stated, according to the petitioners statement, it was valued at $659,000 last year. -Mr. Stephens stated this was incorrect, last year it was valued at $860,666. It went from $659,000 to $871,000 in 2001, this property was Homesteaded this year. It therefore will be capped at this year's value. Page20 October 2, 2002 -Mr. Coyle asked if the large increase was due to the fact that it was not Homesteaded. Mr. Stephens replied that last year's value to this year's value, the increase was not 'an enormous increase, the large increase was the year before. -Mr. Skinner added that the comparables in the packet are proof that the value is there and justified. -Linda Abbot stated that once again, Homestead would have made a difference in taxes, had the petitioner filed earlier. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial because the property appraiser demonstrated the presumption of correctness and there is no evidence to support the petitioner's claim. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Anne Goodnight was not present). 3) TP-25 James A. Lagrippe, 1450 Gulfstar Dr., Windstar Country Club -Mr. Stephens stated that the petitioner had withdrawn his petition early that morning. A Thirty Five minute recess was taken until 2PM. 2:00PM 1) TP-65 Easley, McCaleb & Assoc. (Pine Ridge Crossing) -TP-66 Easley, McCaleb & Assoc. (Courthouse Shadows) -TP-67 Easley, McCaleb & Assoc. (Courthouse Shadows - Shop) -TP-68 Easley, McCaleb & Assoc. (Longhorn of Naples) -TP-71 Easley, McCaleb & Assoc.(Plaza on 3rd St. -Land) -TP-72 Easley, McCaleb & Assoc. (Plaza on 3rd St. - Shop) -& TP-73 Easley, McCaleb & Assoc. (Plaza at 1170 3rd St. - Shop) were all heard at 2PM rather than 3PM since no 2PM petitioner was present, they were heard together. -Ellen Chadwell, Assistant County Attorney, stated for the record that she would be sitting in for Heidi Ashton who had to leave. Page21 -Denise Mally, representing the petitioner, stated that she had no evidence other than the petitions themselves, she was present to keep the claim rights open for the property owner. -Mr. Skinner stated they did not have any information as to the complaint besides the petition. -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-65, based on lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness by the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Anne Goodnight was not present). -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-66, based on lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness by the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Anne Goodnight was not present). -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-67, based on lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness by the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Anne Goodnight was not present). -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-68, based on lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness by the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Anne Goodnight was not present). -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-71, based on lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness by the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Anne Goodnight was not present). -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-72, based on lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness by the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Anne Goodnight was not present). -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-73, based on lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness by the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Anne Goodnight was not present). Page22 October 2, 2002 161 2) TP-69 Easley, McCaleb & Assoc. (Northgate Place Apts.) -Denise Mally, representing the petitioner, handed out a packet of information to the board. (copy was not provided to the court reporter). -Mr. Coletta clarified that the property appraiser had seen this information. -Denise Mally stated that the apartment complex was made up of 120 units. She claimed the property suffered heavy foot traffic from a pathway to a bus stop, this traffic has caused safety and damage issues for the residents, due vandalism, and it has caused the property to have a difficult time leasing the apartments. She stated the property was at 99% occupancy in January and it is currently at 95%. She added that the assessment increase is not justified, due to the aforementioned circumstances and that it should be appraised at $4,300,000. -Donna Fiala asked if they couldn't put up fences or bushes to stop the heavy foot traffic and she added that 95% occupancy is very good. -Donna Fiala made a motion to deny based on a lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the assumption of correctness on behalf of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Mr. Coletta. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Anne Goodnight was not present). -At 2:15PM Anne Goodnight returned and joined the board in the proceedings. 3) TP-36 Robert Ribar C/O Stallings-Ribar Group, (656 Elm Street) -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated that the petitioner provided no evidence as to what their position was. All information on the property appraiser's assessment and comparable properties were listed in the packet provided to the board. -Mr. Coyle recommended denial of the petition based on the fact that there was no evidence provided capable of overcoming the presumption of correctness on behalf of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in Favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 4) TP-37 Robert Ribar C/O Stallings-Ribar Group, (Marco Island) -The petitioner was not present. Page23 October 2, 2002 -Mr. Stephens stated that the petitioner provided no evidence as to what their position was. All information on the property appraiser's assessment and comparable properties were listed in the packet provided to the board. -Mr. Coyle recommended denial of the petition based on the fact that there was no evidence provided capable of overcoming the presumption of correctness on behalf of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in Favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 5) TP - 38 Robert Ribar C/O Stallings-Ribar Group, (Marco Island) -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated that the petitioner provided no evidence as to what their position was. All information on the property appraiser's assessment and comparable properties were listed in the packet provided to the board. -Mr. Coyle recommended denial of the petition based on the fact that there was no evidence provided capable of overcoming the presumption of correctness on behalf of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in Favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 6) TP-39 Aaron Bilton C/O Flanagan, Bilton, (M&I Building) & TP-40 Aaron Bilton C/O Flanagan, Bilton, (M&I Building) -Both petitions were heard together. -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated these were actually one piece of property with two ID#'s. He stated that TP-39 was the Founders bank and TP-40 was a triangular piece of the property leased to the Water-Side Shops for parking. -Mr. Coyle stated that the assessed value was actually less than what it sold for. Mr. Stephens replied that they had no information on the complaint, but the petitioner filed every year. -Mr. Coyle made a motion for denial of the petition TP-39, based on the fact that there was no evidence provided, capable of overcoming the presumption of correctness on behalf of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in Favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coyle made a motion for denial of petition TP-40, based on the fact that there was no evidence provided, capable of overcoming the presumption of correctness on Page24 behalf of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. October 2, 2002 7) TP-45 Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz, LLP, (Tamiami Ford, Inc.) - TP-46 Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz, LLP, (Tamiami Ford, Inc.) - TP-47 Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz, LLP, (Tamiami Ford, Inc.) -TP-48 Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz, LLP, (Tamiami Ford, Inc.) (Golden Gate Est. Unit 44W) -TP-49 Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz, LLP, (Tamiami Ford, Inc.) Progress Commercial Park, Lot 4 -TP-45-TP-49 were all heard together. -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated he had nothing from the petitioner to support objections and there was no paperwork. The Petitioner had informed him that he would not be coming and refused to withdraw the petitions. -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-45 based on a lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-46 based on a lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-47 based on a lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-48 based on a lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny TP-49 based on a lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. A twenty-five minute recess was taken until 3PM. Page25 October 2, 2002 3:00PM 1) TP-55 Damn Mitchell, Whistler's Green. Naples & TP-56 Darrin Mitchell, Whistler's Cove, Naples -Mr. Stephens stated that Maureen Keenen had received a letter, that stated, "Please accept this letter as a formal request to read into the record the current assessed values for the above referenced petitions that are scheduled to be heard. Our client has decided not to dispute the value, so we will not be appearing to make a presentation." -Mr. Coletta asked that the values be read into the record. -Mr. Stephens stated PP-55 the value is $7,514,371. -Mr. Coletta stated that they denied the petition for the lack of evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness by the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5- 0. -Mr. Stephens read the value of TP-56 as $13,144,470. -Mr. Coletta recommended denial for the lack of evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 2) TP-58 JozsefKelemen, 516, 12t~ Ave. S., (Gardenia Court, Inc., Condo, Apt 516) -Mr. Kelemen asked to submit a letter to the board. Mr. Skinner reviewed it first and stated that he had no objections. He explained his English was poor and requested that his letter be read into the record: (A copy was not provided to the court reporter) It was dated - October 2nd, 2002. The letter stated the complex was built in 1992 and not in 1975. His apartment is 870 square feet and not 1,000 square feet, the complex is 55 and over and he gets a senior citizen discount, he has Homestead, and he also has disability. The letter went on to say there is no porch and the complex does not have a swimming pool. It further stated his "purchase price was not $219,900, it is purchase for $187,500. The appraising for $204,000, it is my appraising, it is a seller's appraising value. My appraising value it is; $20,000 for materials, $20,000 for labor, $20,000 for income, plus -$5,000; so the real value is $65,000. The swimming pool is paid as a land lease, shouldn't deduct it. Finally, I was relocated by the State due to my property purchase for Save the Everglades Program. So as a Page26 October 2, 2002 relocated person I should have all the exemptions, even no new tax for my reloc~,l~6 property should not occur. I am confused, my property in Golden Gate Estates was calculated by a contractor for $800,000 because the property appraiser value for $27,000, I was paid $87,000, 10% of the real value, relocating me to the present address. Again, I was treated as you see, I hope your honorable judgement. Thank you again your honorable attention." -Mr. Coyle asked if it was read correctly. Mr. Kelemen stated it was. -Mr. Kelemen stated that he had another item read into the record that does not have to do with this. Mr. Skinner informed him he would have to read it. Mr. Coletta informed him it will only be heard if it has to do with taxes. -Mr. Kelemen stated "people come to America, rich people they buy for million dollar property and then rising the tax. And then original American people cannot afford this. So I suggesting for the American people to give different tax to people 55 and older. That is my proposal." -Donald Wagner, Director of Condominium Appraisals for Collier County, stated most of Mr. Kelemen's statements regarding his condominium are correct. He stated that he agrees it was built in 1974, the declaration of condo was in 1975. He measured the property and it was approximately 910 square feet. He stated, of the four comparable sales provided by Mr. Kelemen, only one was in 2001. He further explained that the first one was in 1998, the second actually had no sale, the third was in the year 2000, and the last one was in 2001. Mr. Wagner added that he agrees the purchase price of $219,000 was high and is not reflective of the current market value, but the $189,000 value is correct, and the property is appraised at $142,500. Comparable sales were provided by the appraisers. He added that a lot of Mr. Kelemen's problem is the increase in taxes and that the reason they went up so much this year is that the previous owner had Homestead. He explained that when the property transfers it goes up to just value. Mr. Kelemen is receiving Homestead for 2002 and a senior exemption for income adjustment, giving him a $50,000 deduction from his market value. -Mr. Coyle asked if the petition stating market value at $204,000 was correct. Mr. Wagner informed him that Mr. Kelemen had stated he put this on there in error. Mr. Coyle then asked if Mr. Kelemen paid $219,000 for the condo. Mr. Wagner replied that the deed was recorded at $219,000 but the state gave back $15,000 at closing, but the sale was not used in the determination for value. Mr. Coyle asked what the Page27 October 2, 2002 appraised value was now. Mr. Wagner stated it was $142,131 with $50,000 in 1 6 l exemptions after that $142,131. -Mr. Coyle and Mr. Wagner then clarified the value was around $92,131 for tax purposes. -Mr. Kelemen stated the problem is with that he is an appraiser from his country and he appraises the value at $65,000. He added that he did not see any deductions for the error of 100 square feet. -Mr. Coletta stated that they admitted it was ~900 square feet. -Mr. Skinner stated that in condominiums they will register the square footage, or what appears to be, but they look at the market and this is what they reflect in their appraisal. Since the gentlemen paid $219,000 he believes they are very conservative on their assessment. -Donna Fiala stated that he was getting a good deal. -Donna Fiala made a motion to deny the request because the evidence isn't sufficient to warrant approval. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 3) TP-59 Adam & Margaret Scheer, 5949 Amberwood Dr. (Pelican Strand, Replat #6, Tract 10, Lot 3) -Mr. Scheer stated they wanted a re-evaluation of their assessment. Their property was initialed assessed for -$684,000. He added when he met with the property appraiser they reduced the square footage slightly and the assessment was reduced to $681,002. He stated that compared to other houses in the neighborhood, he believes they are over-assessed. He used four other comparable houses to back his statements. He used calculations to determine the cost per square foot. He then showed his cost per square foot was $123.32, while the four comparables were between $101-$114 per square foot. He stated there was an identical house, that his was modeled after, and that house was assessed for $590,000. He therefore wanted his assessment re- evaluated. -Mr. Skinner asked if the identical house had identical lots. Mr. Scheer stated they were approximately the same. -Mr. Stephens showed comparables in the packet provided to the committee. The comparable sold in 2001-2002. They were all approximately the same size. He added with the comparative approach the value should be in the neighborhood of Page28 October 2, 2002 $750,000. Based on their information, they believed it is assessed fairly comparel,6 [ the market value. -Linda Abbott asked how they compared that to the information Mr. Scheer spoke of · Mr. Stephens replied that he had not seen the information, he was not saying that it was not given to them, only that he could not recall it or find it at the moment. Mr. Scheer stated that the information was provided to Sherry Flagle on 9/24/2002 at 1:45pm and he had a receipt from her. -Mr. Coletta stated that the petitioner had conflicting numbers and the property appraiser didn't have the information provided by the petitioner and asked if they could continue this till tomorrow in order to a lot the property appraiser time to review the information. -Mr. Skinner said he would like to take the information on the identical house. -Linda Abbott asked for a clarification of the "adjusted" value. -Mr. Scheer stated he understood it was found from 100% of the base area of the house, which is the air conditioned living area, the garage is 70% of the square footage, then any patio or lanai is 20%-30% depending on the quality of construction, those items are then added to get an "adjusted" square footage. Mr. Skinner said it sounded correct. Mr. Scheer stated you then get a comparable comparison when you use the adjusted square footage and if you subtract out the land from the overall evaluation, you are left with the evaluation for the building and the pool and so on... Using this adjusting square footage, a comparable house should have a comparable value per square foot. -Donna Fiala asked the property appraiser to look at this again due to the identical house. -Mr. Coletta made a motion to continue this till the following day. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. -Mr. Scheer had scheduling conflicts. Mr. Skinner sent an appraiser with the Scheer's to discuss the comparables and the idenhcal and then they would try to come back with something this afternoon. -Mr. Coletta amended his motion to continue it until later the same day. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor. (5-0) 4) TP-61 Michael Schaefers, Marco Beach, Unit 7, Blk. 195, Lot 14 (Adirondack) -The petition stated he was not be able to present this in person. Page29 October 2, 2002 -Mr. Stephens stated the petitioner paid $$55,000 for the property in December 2001~ and the petitioner believes it should be appraised at the same. He stated the information provided in the packet, indicates that this price was a very good deal, their assessment was $609,024. -Mr. Coletta stated that three of the comparables were assessed below his and asked what the thought process behind this was. -Mr. Stephens replied that this was the land value, the residual value of the sales that took place minus the buildings. -Mr. Coletta asked if the petitioner had offered any evidence. -Mr. Stephens replied nothing but his own sale. -Mr. Skinner stated they appraise in mass at any given area, some they are over, some are under, that it the reason for so many comparables. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial based on the fact that the evidence the petitioner had provided does not overweigh the presumption of correctness on the part of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 5) TP-62 Raymond Brooks, 1260 Martinique Ct. Marco Island, (Marco Beach, Units 1 & 4 Replat, Blk. 123, Lot 26. -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated the only evidence provided by the petitioner was a letter stating his opinion of value and the petitioner included a sales flyer that showed the asking price for another house that the petitioner stated was identical to his house. (A copy was provided to the court reported and placed with the files received by Minutes) -Mr. Stephens stated this is an older section of Marco. He showed in his packet, that the comparable sales in his packet, also on the canal, support his assessment. -Donna Fiala stated that it look as though the houses were selling for more than his. He said this was basically correct. Donna Fiala asked why they were assessing his house higher than the sales of the comparables. Mr. Stephens told her to take into consideration the ages, the size, and location. He explained the subject house was valued at $285.76/square foot and the sales came in -$290--$334/square foot and he went with a conservative $300/square foot value as for what it would be worth in the market. Page30 October 2, 2002 -Mr. Stephens informed the board that the property in the flyer is on an 80 foot lo~,6 I which is quite smaller than the petitioner's which is -100 foot lot. -Mr. Coyle clarified that the house value is $69,000 and the total assessment is driven mostly by the land, which is valued at -$390,000. Mr. Stephens stated this was correct. Mr. Coyle clarified that the average of comparable land sales was about -390,000. Mr. Stephens stated this was in the "ballpark". -Mr. Coletta stated that he had a problem with his comfort level on this one. Donna Fiala stated she was as well, but she knew by law they were to vote in favor of the property appraiser without clear and convincing evidence otherwise, provided by the petitioner. -Mr. Stephens stated they needed to look at it in an adjusted value per square foot, since there were differences in the lot sizes. -Mr. Skinner stated that if you made it an 80fi lot you would be dealing with -$300,000. -Mr. Coletta and Donna Fiala felt better when considering it in terms of adjusted sale price per adjusted square foot. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial based on the fact that the evidence received does not overturn the presumption of correctness of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 4:00PM -The 4PM petitions were heard starting at 3:55PM since the first petitioners were present at the time. 1) TP-75 Steven & Susan Myhelick, 145 Conners Ave., Vanderbilt Beach -Kevin Jurjinsky, representing the petitioner, stated he had a display that would be appropriate and he had some information that he filed. Mr. Stephens asked if this was the same information provided to the property appraiser's office. Mr. Jurjinsky stated it was the basically the same information, presented differently, in a graph chart. Mr. Stephens stated he wasn't sure that the information displayed truly related to the information he had received, but he would take the word of Mr. Jurjinsky. -Mr. Jurjinsky stated that they felt the assessment on the subject property was higher than what the comparable sales in the area are and much higher per square foot. He Page31 stated public record showed that his clients were the original owners of the property, that it was originally purchased in 1997 and assessed at $210,000. At the time it was a vacant parcel, waterfront of Vanderbilt beach. He stated that before the current assessment they are contesting it was still a vacant parcel of property and was assessed at $464,945. After contracting with Vicon Construction they did $700,000 in improvements and if this was added on it would come to $1,114,115 which they believe to be a comparable assessment. It has currently been assessed at $1,810,000, which is what they are objecting to. He showed a chart of comparable properties taken from Collier County public records. The averages of these properties per square foot were -$210.00 - $349.00 per square foot, his clients property is assessed at least double, sometimes triple of these comparable properties. He added there were two properties, not in the public records, assessed like his clients since they had done improvements, that he included in his comparables list. He stated that they believe the property should be appraised at -$1.2 million not -1.8million. He further explained a condominium has been built in the past years blocking his clients view, and rather than the price decreasing because of this, it has continued to increase. He believes the chart clearly shows that this assessment is not fair and equitable. -Mr. Skinner explained that in the multi-story buildings they use an adjusted square footage, as explained previously with Mr. Scheer's petition. He added any floor above ground floor is taken at a percentage, just as though it was an appendage, which is usually -70% and therefore it would not indicate how much living area under roof, this adjusted square footage is used in all multi-story houses and buildings. He added that he would like to get with Mr. Jurjinsky later, to make sure his calculations were correct, because Mr. Jurjinsky is showing large differences. -Mr. Stephens stated that they have not seen this chart before, the only thing they saw was a sheet that displayed public record broken down into assessed values, taxes, etc... He added that in at least one of the properties Mr. Jurjinsky used an incorrect value, he had used the "capped value" rather than the "market value" which made the large difference in numbers. He stated on the surface it appears that he was comparing "assessed value" and not the "market value", which should have been used. He added all the values used were last years value, not this year. He provided the committee with a packet that listed comparables, that showed the assessment was justified and very reasonable. He stated he was baffled because the petitioner had an appraisal done on the property that valued it at $1.3million on the house (doing the Page32 October 2, 2002 cost approach)and another $675,000 on thc land. gave to the property appraiser's office was for $2,074,000 which is higher than the property appraiser's value of $1.8million. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial due to the fact that the evidence presented did not overset the presumption of correctness on the part of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. -Mr. Stephens stated that as part of the administrative code, this is not the place to dwell on compared assessments from one house to the other, they are to discuss the individual piece of property and whether or not it exceeds market value. He added at a later point, like Mr. Skinner, he would like to sit down with Mr. Jurjinsky and see where these numbers came from, but at this point it appears the numbers were taken from the taxable value or the assessed value and not the market value. He explained that Homestead makes a large difference in this sense. -Mr. Jurjinsky stated he did use assessed value but it still does not figure correctly with the total value. Mr. Stephens stated that those are not the current year values. -Mr. Coletta verified that this information was not previously provided to the property appraiser's office. Mr. Stephens stated that it was not pulled together and displayed as it was today, and therefore they were not aware of the argument the petitioner was trying to make. -Mr. Jurjinsky stated that even if they used the enhanced values, his petitioner's adjusted square footage is still -50% higher than the comparables. -Mr. Coyle asked what the date for the petitioner's appraisal was. Mr. Stephens stated the County appraisal date was January 1st and the petitioner's appraisal date was 9/22/02 and it indicated a value of $2,074,000. Mr. Coyle clarified that the County's appraiser was appraising it for less than the petitioner's appraisal. Mr. Stephens stated that this is true. Mr. Coyle asked about the adjusted square footage assessment. Mr. Stephens stated he believed the petitioner came at the wrong solutions because he used the wrong assessment totals and square footage totals, which do not match those of the county. -Donna Fiala asked if the fact that it was on the waterfront came into factor in the charge per square foot. Mr. Stephens stated it does on the land. -Donna Fiala stated her second stands, Mr. Coletta stated his motion stood as well. -The motion and the second for denial, were recalled. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. Page33 October 2, 2002 161 2) TP-59 Mr. Humble stated that they looked at the information provided by the petitioner and that of the County Appraiser's Office, they came up with a new figure, which was $591,734. Mr. Scheer agreed with this figure. -Mr. Scheer stated that based on this agreement he withdrew his petition. -Ellen Chadwell explained that he could either withdraw his petition and state the agreement on the record or they could amend the petition to state the new assessment amount of $591,734. -Mr. Scheer stated then, that he amended his petition to $591,734 as opposed to $590,095. -The property appraiser stated he agreed to this amount. 3) TP-76 John Dougherty, 560 S. Collier Blvd. (Hilton Resort) -Mr. Dougherty, Vice President of Olshan Hotel Management, stated that they are the management company that operates the Hilton. He informed the board that the past two years have been devastating economically to the Hilton. The hardships are due to hotel growth state wide and the September 11th attacks affecting the tourism. He cited an article that further explained the hotel decline in profits for the previous year. His hotel suffered a bottom line decline of 19.1%. He added that the value of the hotel stems from the stream of income, which in the last 2 ½ years has dramatically decline. He presented the board with information detailing the decline of income for the Hilton, it had an expanded view of future years, which also showed a decline in income. The appraised value in 2001 went up to $38.8 million from $35.5 million in 2000. He stated that based on the income form of value, this is not a justifiable raise. They do not have an exact figure of what it should be appraised at, but they feel -$32 million dollars would be in the approximate neighborhood. -Linda Abbott asked if they were seeing the same decline in the other hotels of Marco Island. Mr. Dougherty stated they were not only seeing it in the other hotels of Marco Island, but in all the hotels of Collier County. Linda Abbott then asked if this was taken into consideration. Mr. Stephens stated if the hotel provides the income they do take it into consideration, and he will explain this further in discussion of the packet provided to the board. -Mr. Stephens stated that they do not only consider the income, but the statute states they must consider all three approaches to value. He added that the petitioner has not Page34 October 2, 2002 done so, that they only considered income, and although it may be down, it does']- generate a higher value than the County Appraiser's assessment. -Donna Fiala asked how they create a higher value if the income has been down two years in a row. Mr. Skinner stated they are looking at it from the Market, Replacement, and Income standpoint, not just the income standpoint. Mr. Stephens added that the value of the property is $130,300 per room. He then showed comparables, which sold much higher prices in previous years; one example was the La Playa, which sold for $313,000 per room and the Pink shell sold for $103,000 per room in 1988. He stated that these examples showed, from a comparison standpoint, that the assessment was well within reason. -Donna Fiala asked when their only business is tourism, wouldn't this weigh more heavily. Mr. Skinner stated that they must take all three approaches and that they have received three different income reports and they used all three of these, none of which include the market approach or the replacement approach. -Mr. Coyle asked why their was a large difference with the numbers, the petitioner came up with $32 million. Mr. Stephens stated he was unaware of the calculations the petitioner used to derive this number. He added that he used a cap rate of 11.5% which is higher than what the petitioner used and this would indicate a lower value. -Mr. Dougherty stated he used a different cap rate, because they did not include the real estate index number in the calculations as did the County Appraiser's Office. He stated the reason for the three different submittals were because it was requested three times in a different format. -Mr. Dougherty and the County Appraiser's Office further discussed differences in how they came to their calculations. -Mr. Coyle stated he was still confused as to the difference of $39 million in the opinion of the County Appraiser's Office and $32 million in the opinion of the Hilton. Mr. Dougherty explained his calculations to the board, step by step. Mr. Skinner stated the petitioner did not use the other two approaches that the Property Appraiser's Office is required to use by FL statute. -Linda Abbott asked if the hotel's sold in 1998 were comparable since there has been a recent decline. Mr. Stephens stated this was probably so, but there are other, more recent comparables (La Playa) that sold for higher prices. Page35 -Linda Abbott stated that this is a significant amount of money and that it may be "over their head" to discuss such fine details of accounting and suggested it coming again before the board, the following day. -Mr. Coletta stated that they must remember that the ramifications of this will go through the entire industry and he asked if consideration of income levels had been done in the calculations of the Property Appraiser. -Mr. Skinner stated that as of January 1 st, they look at all income producing properties from an income value and this was taken into consideration of all properties. Mr. Coletta stated that this is looking at the previous year. Mr. Skinner stated this was correct, they look at it as of January 1st, which shows the income of the previous years, and they are required by law to do so and cannot look past that point. -Mr. Coletta stated that the petitioner's evidence is correct but it is current incomes. Mr. Skinner stated this is correct on behalf of the petitioner and when the Appraisers Office looks at it in the following year, they will consider income, replacement, and market approaches for the entire year. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial due to the evidence shown does not relate to what they are using to make the decision. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. -Donna Fiala asked if there was a way for compromise in this situation. Mr. Skinner stated that there is not, they have taken everything into consideration, and he does not see a replacement cost or market approach on the Hilton from the petitioner. He explained these are necessary and if they do not look at all three they would be doing a false appraisal and the Department of Revenue would not allow this. He believes there assessment is fair and just and the Department of Revenue, in approving the tax roll, shows they feel it was done correctly. -Mr. Coletta added to his motion that the property appraiser has done his full "duty" and "researched" all three approaches, in accordance with the law. Anne Goodnight amended her seconded to follow Mr. Coletta's amended motion. At 5:15PM a five minute recess was taken. -Over the recess Ellen Chadwell reviewed the statutes. She stated there is a rule that addresses the boards power, which says "that the board has no power to fix the original evaluation of property for Ad Valorum tax purposes or to grant an exemption not authorized by law and the board is bound by the same standards as the County Page36 October 2, 2002 Property Appraiser in determining values and granting exemptions." She stated s~6' does not believe this applies here because they are not discussing values. She added that it was important to consider the criteria that the appraiser must follow. The petitioner must show that the appraiser has failed to consider one of these criteria in order to lighten "his load". As for the question of whether or not the petitioner has to use these approaches, Ellen Chadwell stated that it is not mandatory they explain all three approaches. -Mr. Coletta added to his motion that they found that the property appraiser has taken into consideration all statutory criteria in his appraisal and arrived at a just value of the property. Anne Goodnight amended her second to follow. -Linda Abbott based that on legal council's previous description, she feels the property appraiser has addressed all three approaches, and if the petitioner wanted to overturn this, she believes that he would need to consider the other two approaches, not just the income. Donna Fiala stated that she agreed, and she believed the petitioner addressed present day value for the market, but she does not feel he look at the replacement approach. She added that she believes the property appraiser feels he has done his job correctly. -Linda Abbott asked if the appraised Market Value had gone up. Mr. Stephens stated yes, last year it was assessed at $35.5 million to $38.8 million and the Market Value is one of the approaches taken into consideration during the assessment. -Mr. Coletta recalled the motion. All were in favor, the motion for denial passed unanimously, 4-0 (Mr. Coyle left at 5:15PM and was not in attendance for this motion). 4) TP-79 Henry Halle, Sr. 1046 12t~ Ave. N. (Self Storage) -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated the petitioner provided no information to his office. The self storage unit is a 3story building built this year. They have the property valued at $5.2 million, they used all three approaches, and believe their value is just. He provided the committee with comparables. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of the petition due to the lack of sufficient evidence to overtum the presumption of correctness of the property appraiser. Donna Fiala seconded the motion. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0. (Mr. Coyle was not in attendance). Page37 October 2, 2002 5) TP-80 Henry Halle, Sr. 1046 12th Ave. N. (Apartment Bldg.) -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated they assessed it at $779,719, the petitioner paid $975,000 for the property in December of 2001. -Ellen Chadwell asked if anything had been submitted by the petitioner. Mr. Stephens stated no. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial due to the lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness of the property appraiser. Anne Goodnight seconded the motion. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0. (Mr. Coyle was not in attendance). 6) TP-81 Henry Halle, Sr. 1046 12th Ave. N. -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated they had not received any information from the petitioner. He added that this was a new house built at Lake Park, it was assessed for $388,510 from a cost and market standpoint, he believes they can justify over $400,000. -Mr. Skinner stated, that according to the insurance, it is $313,990. -Donna Fiala made a motion for denial based on a lack of evidence to support the petition. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0. (Mr. Coyle was not in attendance). 7)- TP-82 Dr. Susan Lee, Marco Beach Unit 4 Blk 127 Lot 10 -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated that the petitioner provided his office with a letter from a realtor, that showed listings of properties that closed in the year 2002, one did not sell. It was included in the evidence package provided to the board, it was dated August 24, 2002. Mr. Stephens stated the best comparable was the property directly across the street, which sold for $535,000 and the subject property was assessed at $469,000. -Donna Fiala asked if she had been Homesteaded. Mr. Stephens informed her they were not and he was unaware of what her intentions are. -Anne Goodnight made a motion for denial based on the lack of evidence provided by the petitioner and the assessment of the property appraiser should hold. It was Page38 October 2, 2002 seconded by Mr. Coletta. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0. (Mr. Coyle was not in attendance). 16[ 8) TP-85 William Koupa, 680 Solana Ct, Marco Beach U 11 Blk 360 Lot 16 -Mr. Stephens stated the petitioner went home earlier in the evening due to illness. The petitioner asked that the material be read into the record. He indicated that he had not discussed this with the Property Appraiser's Office, Mr. Skinner stated that he would allow it into the record and at a later point they can discuss the document in the Property Appraiser's Office. -Ellen Chadwell read this document into the record. (A copy was not provided to the court reporter). The document stated that the estimated market value as of January 1st is $657,538. Attached to the petition was a letter dated September 5th, 2002, which stated the assessed value was too high because it failed to consider comparable properties and it did not consider the devaluation protests of properties being filed with the city of Marco Island, Department of Transportation, the US Coast Guard and any other entity related directly and indirectly with the implementation of navigable markers. Both proposals had attached sheets further clarifying their positions. The document was signed William Koupa "and/or" Robbie S. Koupa, attached were listing's of the two comparable properties. -Donna Fiala stated that he made a great case for the problems with the Coast Guard and how the waterways affect his property, but she did not have a problem with what the property appraiser appraised the property at. -Donna Fiala made a motion for denial because the property appraiser is entitled to presumption of correctness and the tax payer has not proven that the property appraiser is incorrect and there is not sufficient to overcome the presumption. It was seconded by Anne Goodnight. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Mr. Coyle was not in attendance). 1 9) TP-88 Douglas Cook, 796 Starboard Dr., Moorings U6 Blk F Lot 12 -Mr. Cook, stated that he wanted to present a 4page composite, he stated he did not provide it sooner due to a medical condition and surgery. Mr. Coletta stated for the record that it was a lengthy document and they probably would not have time to read it. Mr. Skinner reviewed the composite and stated he had no objections. (A copy was not provided to the court reporter). Mr. Cook stated it was only a summary of Page39 October 2, 2002 what he wanted to say. He stated that after applying for his Homestead in 2002, h~e6 I was granted Homestead. His taxes increased from $51,018 2001 to $66,095 in 2002. This represents 30%+ increase in his taxes. He stated that he feels this tax increase was a gross increase (from $394,279 in 2001 to $550,793 in 2002). He stated this represented a gross increase of almost 40%. He explained the assessment is much higher than true and fair evaluation, based on numerable comparable properties. He listed comparables when he filed the petition, it included 11 comparable properties, they came in at an average of $422,545. He added that his property was a comer and went on to further discuss the setting and factors he took into account on his property (noise, traffic, neighboring communities and properties, etc..). He believes that these negative factors support his claim that the assessment is too high. He added that the proposed assessment increase represents 91% of the original lot value in 1968 ($73,000). He questioned if he owned a front lot property of 125ft as he was informed by the County Appraiser's Office. He questioned this because the City of Naples informed him that they have a 60ft right away on Bennacle and Starbaord. Due to all the aforementioned facts, he asked that his assessed property value be $435,221 for 2002. After Homestead is taken into consideration his proposal becomes $410,221. He added that he bought the property for $385,000 in 2000. Mr. Cook provided a photo to the board of the Chateau Susan. -Anne Goodnight asked if this was one of the Save Our Homes, homes. Mr. Stephens stated that last year there was no Homestead, but this year there is, he is not sure why the petitioner did not apply when he bought it. Anne Goodnight stated she thought if it was a Save Our Homes and then it did not transfer when Mr. Cook bought the property, which would explain the large increase. Mr. Stephens said that was a good possibility. Mr. Skinner asked Mr. Cook if the previous owner had Homestead. Mr. Cook stated she did and had purchased the property in 1994, she also had widow exemptions. Anne Goodnight explained that she had Save our Homes as well and when it was sold the assessed value reverted back. Mr. Skinner stated this was correct. Mr. Cook stated he did not apply earlier for Homestead because he was under the assumption that he did not meet the eligibility. Mr. Cook verified that he did not live there until February of 2001 and therefore did not qualify till the following year. Page40 October 2, 2002 -Mr. Skinner stated that in reference to the 125ft, they did their calculations by ~ ~ platted subdivision. Mr. Coletta clarified that this was universal through the whole county. Mr. Skinner stated that was correct. -Mr. Stephens stated the petitioner should have received a corrected notice, that they made a change to this property, based on the fact that it was a comer lot, and it was adjusted. It was adjusted down to $502,751. The value actually petitioned was $557,093, therefore the adjustment took the value down -$50,000.. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial based on the lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness on the part of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 3-0 (Mr. Coyle was not in attendance, Linda Abbott left the meeting at 6:20, therefore she was not in attendance either). 1 10) TP-89 APF Develop. II LLC, 5121 Castello Dr. Ste 2, (Hangars @ Naples Airport-Units 703,719, 723,721) -Howard Mede, owner of APF Development, stated this was a property at the Naples Airport. He went on to state that they have resided at the airport for over five years, this is the 3rd facility they have been in, and in the past they were always exempt from property taxes based on classification as a "fixed base operator". He explained his petition was that it should have been exempt due to its classification. He stated they contacted the Airport concerning the matter, but did not receive a reply until an hour before this meeting. He read the letter allowed, which was from Ted Sulliday, executive Director. The letter stated that they were in fact leasing property at the airport and that it met the criteria for the classification as a "fixed base operator". -Mr. Gourum read from FL statute 196.0.0 which clarifies a fixed base operator. He added the problem they run into is that on September 10, 2002 Sheila Dugan told him APF was not a fixed base operator. He asked Mr. Merle what the four hangers are used for. Mr. Merle replied that they are for storage of aircraft, which are not currently owned by him. Mr. Gourum explained that just because someone leases a hanger, does not mean that they are a fixed base operator, and that he received nothing on the situation prior to March 1st, which is the deadline for exemption. -Mr. Merle stated that he was told that he had to get the information from the Airport, and he was unaware that he, himself, had to apply for the petition. When he received his trim notice, he stated he immediately went to the airport and requested the letter Page41 October 2, 2002 about September 9t~, 2002, unfortunately he did not receive the letter from the ~fl~po~ until this day. -Ellen Chadwell stated that they can consider if he had extenuating circumstances, but they also needed to consider if he qualified for the exemption. -Mr. Coletta asked Mr. Gourum for the qualifications of a fixed base operator. Mr. Gourum listed the qualifications, and stated that leasing the space only, will not qualify (this is the position of his office and their attorneys). Mr. Gourum stated that they will allow the letter into the record, but this is the first that they heard of it and that they heard the opposite from Sheila Dugan. -Ellen Chadwell read into the record, FL statute 196.012 subsection 6, which was previously read from by Mr. Gourum. -Mr. Coletta asked Mr. Merle if anyone in Collier County called and requested space in his hanger, would he provide it to them. Mr. Merle stated yes. Mr. Coletta asked what other services he provides. Mr. Merle stated chartering, buying & selling of airplanes, and they have an on-site jet fuel that they are attempting to get permitted to sell fuel to the general public. -The board discussed the possibility of a continuance until they could speak with Ted Sulliday about his letter. -Mr. Skinner asked if they could review this after the fact. He wanted to discover why one person stated it was not a fixed base operation while another said it was. -Through discussion it was found that the reason for the two answers is that APF used to be under another name, and they built the hangers, therefore Sheila Dugan may have been under the assumption that they were merely the developers, when in actuality they kept five hangers for their existing operation that is exempted. Mr. Gourum and Mr. Mede stated they believed that this information explained the discrepancy and the hangers therefore were a fixed base operation. -Anne Goodnight made a motion for approval finding that this is a fixed base operation at the airport. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 3-0 (Linda Abbott and Mr. Coyle were not in attendance). The meeting recessed at 6:55PM and reconvened at 9AM October 3rd, 2002. Page42 October 2, 2002 VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD Jim Coletta, Chairman ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK These minutes approved by the Board on As presented or as corrected Page43 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD Naples FL, October 3' 2002 October 3, ~0~,~ ! LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Value Adjustment Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m. in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Jim Coletta, (County Commissioner) Donna Fiala (County Commissioner) Fred Coyle Nelson Faerber, (School Board) Don York, (School Board) ALSO PRESENT: Abe Skinner, Property Appraiser; Bruce D. Stephens, Sally Garrett, Doug Gorham, John Hamblen, Don Wegner, and Kevin J. Lilly, Property Appraiser's Office; and Ellen Chadwell, Assistant County Attorney. Pagel Misc. Corres: Item# ~ ~ ~. Copies To: 9=00 A.M. TP-93 TP-94 TP-95 TP-96 TP-97 TP-98 TP-99 TP-112 10.'00 A.M. TP-125 TP-131 TP-132 11~00 A.M. TP-135 TP-139 TP-140 TP-146 TP-148 TP-149 TP-150 VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA OCTOBER 3, 2002 161 1 Carroll & Carroll/Rosemarie Tranchina, Lot 2, Blk 20, Royal Harbor, Unit 3 Carroll & Carroll/Michael Lusk,Lot 11 Blk 10 Royal Harbor Unit 2 Carroll & Carroll/Todd Grooms,Lot 9 Blk 5 Royal Harbor Unit 1 Carroll & Carroll/Thomas Tadych,Lot 34 Blk 12 Royal Harbor Unit 3 Carroll & Carroll/David Gardner,Lot 34 Blk 10 Royal Harbor Unit 3 Frank McGinnis,Marco Bch Unit 8 Blk 281 Lot 18 Cheffy, Passidomo,Wilson&Johnson James Silloway, 5000 Groveland Terrace James Wilson, 1897 N. Bahama Ave, Marco Island Irvin Povlow, Marco Bch Unit 11 Blk 359 Lot 8 vittorio Polsinelli, Little Hickory Shores Unit 2 Blk E Lot 7 Vittorio Polsinelli, Little Hickory Shores Unit 2 Blk E Lot 8 Donald O'Hare,520 Turtle Hatch Rd, Park Shore Unit 3 Blk 19 Lot 30 Red Lobster #444, 2355 N. US Hwy 41 Marriott - Naples Brighton Gardens, 7801 Airport Rd Hines Prop. Tax Consult. (RSG Family Ltd), Parkway Plaza Replat Tract A Caruthers &Assoc. Inc., Hilton Hotel-Naples Caruthers &Assoc. Inc., Hilton Hotel-Naples Caruthers &Assoc. Inc., Baymont Inn & Suites Page i THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS WERE NOT APPROPRIATELY AND/OR TIMELY FILED: a o b o e o go Judith Jaffe, no filing fee and not on appropriate form and not notarized Henry Juenemann, untimely filed and not notarized Nick Benjacob, untimely filed and no filing fee Robert Kurimsky, not filed on appropriate form and not notarized Francis D. Hussey, Jr., untimely filed Ernie Benedetto representing Zannos Grekos & Athina Kyritsis, untimely filed. JR's Custom Cabinets of So. Fl., Inc. - untimely filed Mitchell G. Goberna, 6875 Friendship Lane, - untimely filed Kenneth B. Block, 6 Gulf Cottage Dr., - untimely filed MOTION TO APPROVE CERTIFICATE FOR TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY MOTION TO APPROVE CERTIFICATE FOR REAL PROPERTY ADJOURN - SINE DIE Page 2 9:00AM October 3, 2002 -Chairman Coletta called the meeting to order at 9:05am. -Ellen Chadwell gave a short presentation, reviewing the FL Statute 193.011. The taxpayer has the burden of showing, through clear and convincing evidence, that the Property Appraiser has failed to consider one of the eight criteria or that the appraisal practices were arbitrary in comparison to like comparables, otherwise the presumption of correctness is for the Property Appraiser. Ellen Chadwell handed the board written information to follow through the meeting. 1) TP-93 Carroll & Carroll/Rosemarie Tranchina, Lot 2, Blk 20, Royal Harbor, Unit 3 TP-94 Carroll & Carroll/Michael Lusk, Lot 11 Blk 10 Royal Harbor Unit 2 TP-95 Carroll & Carroll/Todd Grooms, Lot 9 Blk 5 Royal Harbor Unit 1 TP-96 Carroll & Carroll/Thomas Tadych, Lot 34 Blk 12 Royal Harbor Unit 3 TP-97 Carroll & Carroll/David Gardner, Lot 34 Blk 10 Royal Harbor Unit 3 -Ray Carroll, Carroll & Carroll, stated his firm is representing the petitioner Tranchina on TP-93. (State Certified General Appraiser #000165). Mr. Carroll explained that he wanted to clarify his objections: 1) The County Appraiser has not followed FL Statute 194.011 sub 4 sub B, which requires him to provide the petitioner, no later than 5 days after the petitioner provides the information required under paragraph A, the Property Appraiser shall provide to the petitioner, a list of evidence to be provided at the hearing, together with all documentation to be considered by the board, and a summary of evidence to be provided by witnesses. 2) A series of procedures, required by the Department of Revenue, under Section 194.011 Sub 5, are not to be found. 3) The Value Adjustment Board has not held the organizational meeting required by FL Statute 194.011 sub 5 sub B -Mr. Carroll added that because these things have not been done, he does not believe his clients have had a fair opportunity to prepare. He asked that all those testifying, be sworn in. Page2 October 3, 2002 161 -Mr. Coletta stated that they will deal only with the parcels he is testifying in. Mr. Carroll stated the only people testifying in these were himself and Cindy Faulkner. The court reporter swore in Ray Carroll and Cindy Faulkner. -Nelson Faerber stated that he would abstain from voting on TP-94, because the petitioner, Dr. Michael Lusk, is his Doctor. -Ellen Chadwell suggested that if the petitioner has concerns about the boards not having seen evidence, that the board have the opportunity to view the information now. She also suggested that the Property Appraiser allow time for the petitioner to review the evidence that he will present to the board. She added there is a concern whether or not the petitioner feels that they have been unduly prejudiced. -Mr. Skinner stated that they have no objection to the petitioner viewing the evidence they will be showing before the board. -Mr. Coyle asked if the "extensive database" of comparisons compiled by the petitioner, was seen by the Property Appraiser. -Mr. Faerber asked Mr. Carroll to further address the objections he had against the board, and wanted Mr. Carroll to clarify what it was he was asking the board to do in preparation. Mr. Carroll reviewed the FL Statute 194.011 sub 5 sub B. Mr. Faerber stated he did not notice anything procedurally done different, in the board's preparation, in the last 14 years. Mr. Coletta stated that on both days they have been briefed by the Tax Appraiser's Office and they have also had literature on what is expected of them. He asked Mr. Carroll what he was asking them to do. Mr. Carroll stated that he had a problem with the fact procedure was not followed and that if the Property Appraiser has any information he has not had the opportunity to review, then he will object. Mr. Coletta stated that it would be noted in the record. -Mr. Skinner asked if the FL Statute the petitioner was referencing was current or one that was to go into effect next year, January 1st, 2003. -Mr. Carroll stated the board did not have their information, submitted September 25th, 2002, which was the deadline date for submittal of materials. He added, if the board did not have their materials, then his clients are at a distinct disadvantage since the board will not be aware of what he is speaking of. Page3 October 3, 2002 161 -Mr. Coyle made a motion that the board postpone this particular portion of the hearing to permit the petitioner to resolve data exchange with the tax assessor. It was seconded by Mr. Faerber. -Ellen Chadwell stated that these portions (regarding 10day and 5day requirements) are part of a new legislation that does not become effective until January 1st, 2003. -Mr. Skinner stated that according to the information given by Ellen Chadwell, the first objection is not relevant. -Kevin Lily, Property Appraiser's Office, stated that the statute was passed in May and takes effect January 1 st, 2003, and they do not believe it is relevant in the case today. -Mr. Coyle agreed that it was irrelevant but added his concern was that they do not have the information submitted by the petitioner, and if it was submitted on time, then they should be able to review it and this was the reason for the motion. -Mr. Coletta stated that they would allow an adequate amount of time for the petitioner to gather copies of his information for the board to view. -Ellen Chadwell had concems of the delay being too long and stated she would be happy to have copies made for each of the board members, so that they may proceed as soon as possible. -Mr. Coyle and Mr. Faerber included Ellen Chadworth's statement into their motion and second. -The motion was recalled. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, (5-0). 2) TP-98 Frank McGinnis, Marco Bch Unit 8 Blk 281 Lot 18 -The petitioner was not present. -Bruce Stephens stated Maureen was given a letter yesterday, that he believed the petitioner would like read into the record. -Mr. Faerber asked if it was not so that if the petitioner is not present than the motion is denied. Mr. Coletta explained they have been presenting what they could in order to carry out due justice. -Mr. Faerber stated his legal profession states if you are not present to state your case, then you lose. Therefore, he made the motion to deny the motion, based on Page4 the fact that the petitioner is not here to present his case. York. -Mr. Coletta asked that the letter be read into the record. October 3, 2002 It was seconded by Mr. -Ellen Chadwell read the letter into the record. It was dated September 28th, 2002, written by Frank McGinnis. It stated that he was employed out of state and unable to attend, therefore he requested a hearing January of 2003. He added that on the petition, he noted the house is all wood and therefore decreases the value of his house. He added photos for the board to view. -Ellen Chadwell stated they should address the request for the continuance. -Donna Fiala asked why they don't receive submittal's of information of petitioners. -Mr. Skinner stated, at this time, it is the petitioner's responsibility to present it to the Clerk of Courts so that it goes to the board. The new statute will change this and that information will be forthcoming in the future. -The motion was recalled for denial. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Faerber moved to deny the motion of continuance as well. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 3) TP-99 Cheffy, Passidomo, Wilson & Johnson James Silloway, 5000 Groveland Terrace -James and Mary Silloway. Mrs. Silloway stated they believe in comparison to neighboring houses, they feel the appraisal of their house was overstated. They did comparisons by viewing the tax rolls for neighbors in the community. She added they moved into the home in 1999, from 2000-2001 their taxes went up 7%, they then filed for domicile and Save Our Homes. They were upset that it took a year to go into effect, because there taxes have now gone up 20% in one year. -Mr. Coyle asked if they were Homesteaded and when. Mrs. Silloway stated they were Homesteaded but it had not kicked in yet. Mr. Coyle stated this was where the problem came in. He then asked if they were looking at the assessments of the value of property when they were comparing. Mrs. Silloway stated yes, the market value that was on the tax record. Page5 October 3, 2002 161 -Mr. Skinner stated the records can be misleading on the tax records, without knowing who had Homestead and other exemptions. -Mr. Faerber stated he has not heard any testimony that would show one of the 8 elements of 193.011 has not been met by the appraiser and he so moved that the petition TP-99 be denied. It was seconded by Mr. Coletta. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Stephens suggested one of the appraisers go and discuss the papers with the Silloways so that they may understand the situation better. It was so done. 4) TP-112 James Wilson, 1897 N. Bahama Ave, Marco Island -Mr. Wilson stated he bought his home in June for $189,500, the tax assessment at the time was -$110,000. After the sale his market value increased -51% to $164,000. He objects to the large increase. He sent in three comparable sales, that sold within six months of his and their market values were -69% to -78% of the actual sale, his was 87% and he believes this is arbitrarily high. -Mr. Skinner stated they are not dealing with percentages, they are mass appraising, sometimes it hits higher, other times lower. He added percentages will skew the image. -Mr. Wilson stated he was being assessed at build-out level and there are vacant lots surrounding his home. -Mr. Skinner pointed out that his house is being assessed lower than what he actually paid for the house. -Mr. Faerber stated he had set market value at $189,000 when he bought it for that price. -Mr. Wilson stated that his house is also an older house in the neighborhood. -Mr. Skinner stated that when you look at the website, you are looking at last years figures. -Mr. Stephens stated his sale price was not considered in the assessment of January 1 st, because the house had not even been purchased at that point. He added that the petitioner gave 2 out of 3 comparables for 2002. He explained also that non-water side properties in Marco increased greatly this past year. He feels they have supported their appraisal adequately and it is a fair and just value. Page6 October 3, 2002 -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial based on a lack of sufficient evidence to161 overturn the presumption of correctness on the part of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 10:00AM -The first petitioners were present so they began a few minutes before 10am. 1) TP-131 Vittorio Polsinelli, Little Hickory Shores Unit 2 Blk E Lot 7 TP-132 Vittorio Polsinelli Little Hickory Shores Unit 2 Blk E Lot 8 -Mrs. Polsinelli stated that since the year 2000, their assessment and their taxes have doubled. She added that they have resided their since 1986. She explained her husband retired this year and they are not sure that they can afford to continue living there on a fixed income. One of the properties is a neighboring vacant lot they purchased in -1987 for $89,000, it is currently assessed for $407,000. She stated they were not Homesteaded, she has Homestead in another state. -Mr. Skinner informed her that if she considers this her legal residence then she should apply for Homestead. He added that she can only have it in one state and therefore needs to weigh the options. -Mrs. Polsinelli stated their house is being assessed higher than a neighboring house that sold last year for -$580,000. She stated there house is older and not as nice. She asked why her vacant lot increased so high as well. -Mr. Skinner stated she is on the water and the market has increased greatly in the last few years. -Mr. Stephens provided the board with the information of the County Appraiser. -Mr. Faerber made a motion for denial of TP-131, based on a the fact that there was no clear and convincing evidence to prove that the eight criteria of Property Appraiser were not met and there was no evidence of arbitrary practices. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Faerber made a motion for denial of TP-132, based on a the fact that there was no clear and convincing evidence to prove that the eight criteria of Property Appraiser were not met and there was no evidence of arbitrary practices. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 2) TP-125 Irvin Povlow, Marco Bch Unit 11 Blk 359 Lot 8 Page7 October 3, 2002 -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated they had a note that stated the petitioner had called the day before and stated she would not be attending. Mr. Stephens stated at the bottom of the petition some sales were written down. His office investigated the sales and they were not in the same area. -Mr. Faerber made a motion for denial of TP-125 because the petitioner did not present any information to support the criteria in FL Statute 193.011 or 194.301. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, (5-0). At 10:15am a fifteen minute recess was taken. 3) TP-93 Unit 3 TP-94 TP-95 TP-96 TP-97 Carroll & Carroll/Rosemarie Tranchina, Lot 2, Blk 20, Royal Harbor, Carroll & Carroll/Michael Lusk, Lot 11 Blk 10 Royal Harbor Unit 2 Carroll & Carroll/Todd Grooms, Lot 9 Blk 5 Royal Harbor Unit 1 Carroll & Carroll/Thomas Tadych, Lot 34 Blk 12 Royal Harbor Unit 3 Carroll & Carroll/David Gardner, Lot 34 Blk 10 Royal Harbor Unit 3 -Mr. Carroll provided his handouts for the board. -Ellen Chadwell provided the board and the court reporter with a copy of the new FL Statute that was being referenced. She referenced Pg. 6 & 7, which discussed paragraph 4 sub B. She noted on the last page of the document, a listing which stated it does not take effect until January 1st, 2003. -Mr. Carroll, discussed the assessment process in Florida and stated that it was a confusing system. He referenced the eight criteria and stated that #8 is in to allow deductions for cost of sale. He stated that 15% is a reasonable deduction used throughout the sate of Florida. He explained then that the target value is 85%. He did not know the assessment ratio used, but added that they attempted to find the assessment ratio being used, and explained to the committee the ratio they came to, which was 72% - 74%. He stated that Royal Harbor was 90% and this poses a problem. He stated he would discuss five of the properties in Royal Harbor. His point was that, by law, they are to start with 100%, apply the eight criteria, and in the eighth they can apply cost of sale. Page8 October 3, 2002 -Cindy Faulkner, state certified Residential Appraiser. In reference to TP-93 she showed the MLS listing for this property and reviewed the information with the board. Their opinion of just value as of January 1 st, 2002 was $1,050,000, she added that after the discount of 75% they arrive at $756,000. She stated their request is the adjustment to $756,000 for this property. She explained that property values in Royal Harbor has increased, but her studies showed the increase seem to cease and stabilize in early 2001. In her opinion, in the first or second quarter of 2001, this market stabilized. -Mr. Skinner stated the 85% they use, is to be presented with their tax roll to Tallahassee for roll approval. He added that other counties use different percentages on different properties and that Collier County uses a 15% deduction on all properties, for roll approval. -Mr. Humble stated the trim notice on this parcel went out on 08/01/2002, they then found a minus factor for size was not applied, it has been corrected and the petitioner is aware of this. The new value is $842,580 for the land and $27,996 for a wood dock built after the sale, for a new value of $875,076. -Kevin Lily, Property Appraiser's Office, stated his qualifications. He explained he is currently the tax roll analysts for the Property Appraiser's Office and is normally here to listen to the presentation for the Property Appraiser in defense of just value. He added that he would like to present his information on TP-93 through TP-97, due to the concerns presented earlier in the meeting. He specifically wanted to point out some of the flaws in the petitioners way of arriving at just value. He handed out a document to the board and the petitioner, that discussed the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, summary points, and evidence of the information. Summary points: 1) The sales ratio study for January 1st assessment date cannot include 2002 sales. 2) An assessment to sales ratio study may not be used to challenge individual parcel values. 3) The petitioner's data used in the assessment/sales ratio analysis is seriously flawed. 4) Our analysis of the assessment/sales ratio study show the County to be approximately 100.1% (unadjusted 85.05%) and the Royal Harbor neighborhood at 100% (unadjusted 84.98%). Page9 October 3, 2002 5) Equalizing assessments at a percentage below fair market value is contrary to our Florida statutes, Administrative Codes and appraisal methods, and therefore should not be allowed. -Mr. Lilly went through the second page of the packet, which discussed the date of assessment. He then referenced Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, which sited mass appraisals rules. He explained the petitioner is attempting to use a retrospective analysis using 2002 sales. He then cited information in the packet discussing the retrospective analysis. He added that there cut-off point for assessment is January 1st (by law), this means they can only use sales from the prior year. The petitioner is using sales from June of 2001 to June of 2002. He also went through the factors used to determine highest and best value; the eight criteria listed under FL Statute 193.011. FL Statute 195.096 was also referenced in order to show what the Department of Revenue does when they receive the roll submitted by the county. Mr. Lily included a letter to Mr. Schultz that described the eighth criteria and how it is applied, he added that there is case law in these matters. The letter states that a taxpayer appearing before the VAB cannot adjust comparable sales prices by 15%. Mr. Lilly explained that another letter included in the packet also to Mr. Schultz stated that you cannot use property assessment ratios in individual property assessment challenges before the VAB. The letter also clarifies that it is not the purpose of the value adjustment board to equalize assessments. Mr. Lilly reviewed sampling errors included in the petitioner's study, listed in the packet, page 19-20. The errors were in sale price, no actual recorded sale, duplication of sales, and recorded sales dated in 2002 or with the wrong recorded date. Mr. Lilly included the petitioner's packet in his own, in order for the board to see how the petitioner came to his conclusions and the errors in doing so. Mr. Lilly stated if they did use the petitioner's study, that it shows the property appraiser is actually low and that Royal Harbor prices are increasing, but this is an unofficial study and has elements not allowed to be used (2002 sales, etc.). Prior to today's meeting, the Property Appraiser did not have the petitioner's information on Royal Harbor, so in his packet he added the Royal Harbor 2001 information from the County Appraiser's Office, and the ratio unadjusted is 84.5%. He finalized that their roll was approved again this year without any problems. Pagel0 October 3, 2002 -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of TP-93, based on the lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness on behalf of the Property Appraiser. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. -Mr. Carroll stated the County Appraiser's Office failed to meet criteria #1, because they did not consider current listings at the time. He added Mr. Lilly and Mr. Skinner made his case when they stated that it is not 100% of market value, but a fraction of that. He stated that you cannot take a group of properties and apply them as they have been this morning, out of context, and there is case law to support this. He discussed a case where a property owner was being assessed on a house that did not exist, and added that this is not meeting the criteria #6. He said that if one does not apply the assessment ratio then one is being arbitrary and the county has been arbitrary. He asked the board to reconsider their motion. -The motion was recalled, all were in favor of denial, the motion passed unanimously, (5-0). -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of TP-94, for the same reasons listed in the denial of TP-93. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. -Mr. Faerber stated he would not vote on TP-94 because the petitioner is his doctor. -Mr. Carroll asked that each be heard separately. The board stated they were under the impression that earlier he chose to have them all heard together, they allowed him to provide any information that was different and unique to each property. -TP-94 - Mr. Carroll stated that TP-94 had a listing that was active for less than its original assessment. He believes this is an older home, improvements were not considered accurately in the appraisal. -TP-94 - Cindy Faulkner, handed out a packet of information on the property and its comparables. She began to discuss the information listed in the packet. She explained that in the MLS the property was listed on October 18, 2001 for $625,000. The 2002 proposed assessed value was $643,460. She stated in June 2002 the property sold for $580,000. She added the conflict is in the list price and the assessed value. She stated that the sale price shows it is not worth the assessed value. -Mr. Stephens stated the assessed value was $643,460 and the value is based on information of 2001. He stated he did a cost and market approach, adjusting for differences in houses. This value includes the structure added to it. Mr. Stephens then reviewed the comparables in the packet they provided to the board. Page 11 -The motion was recalled. All were in favor of the motion for denial of TP-94, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Mr. Faerber did not vote due to conflict) -TP-95 - Cindy Faulkner handed a packet of information to the board. She stated the MLS in September of 2001 was $795,000, assessment in the trim notice was $662,516, sold in April of 2002 for & 685,000. Their belief of a just value is $501,840. -Mr. Coyle asked if the list and sale price represents an accurate value for taxation purposes. Mr. Skinner stated the list price is not, they deal with sales and comparable sales. Mr. Coyle then asked if it served a purpose in stating sale price. Mr. Skinner stated it is used only when other comparables are doing the same. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of TP-95, for the same reasons listed in the denial of TP-93. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor of the motion for denial of TP-95, the motion passed unanimously, 4-0 (Mr. Faerber was not present for the presentation) -TP-96 - Cindy Faulkner stated that the proposed assessment value is $1,018,683, the MLS listing October 2001 was $824,900, it sold in May 2002 for $770,000, the house no longer exists, their estimated market value as of 1/1/02 is $790,000. She added that with the applied discount, the result is $568,800. -Mr. Stephens stated the house was torn down in 2002. He referred to a map showing comparables (also referred to in TP-95) and discussed the comparables used by the county and petitioner. He explained the petitioners comparables were not always as accurate as they could have been. He added he didn't understand why the petitioner used 2002 sales in some cases and not others. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of TP-96, for the same reasons listed in the denial of TP-93. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor of the motion for denial of TP-96, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0 -TP-97 - Mr. Carroll stated they could see there was no point in a presentation and stated they would stand aside. Mr. Faerber stated there was a point and he added that he wanted to hear the information. -Mr. Stephens stated the petitioner came in and discussed the value of the property before they petitioned. After the petitioner left, and the assessment value was Pagel2 October 3, 2002 lowered on the subject property and a number of others in that area. He stated thl 6 assessment was changed from $1.4 million to $1,190,928. A trim notice was then sent to the petitioner. -Ellen Chadwell asked if the petitioner is withdrawing or not making a presentation. -Mr. Carroll stated that they see no point in making a presentation but they are not withdrawing the petition. -Ellen Chadwell asked that the changes in assessment be reiterated. -Mr. Stephens stated the original petitioned assessment was $1,453,128 and it was changed to $1,190,928. -Mr. Faerber stated that he wanted a presentation because it was on the water, but the petitioner did not want to present information, so he didn't have a choice. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial of TP-97, for the same reasons listed in the denial of TP-93. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor of the motion for denial of TP-97, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0 A ten minute recess was taken at ll:38AM 11:00AM -Review of these petitions began at 11:48AM. 1) TP-140 Marriott - Naples Brighton Gardens, 7801 Airport Rd -Renee Linten handed out packets of information to the board. She stated this is an assisted living facility with 143 units; 103 are assisted living, 40 are nursing units Alzheimer's care. She stated she was here for 2001 year end income information. She reviewed her calculations in the packet and stated they came to a rounded figure of $4 million. She stated that they do not believe the assessed value shows a fair market value and they request it be adjusted to $4 million or to $4,216,292 (the assessed value in 2000). -Mr. Skinner stated they did an income, replacement, and market approach. They could find no comparable market in this city. -Mr. Stephens stated the property is the Brighton Gardens. He added before the trim notices went out, he made an adjustment due to the income they provided. He stated that he rarely gets an automated statement on income in these situations because they can't determine Medicare and the like. He added his point is that Pagel3 October 3, 2002 they are currently at $5million, the current land value is $333,000 and the improvements are almost $4.7 million, the income has been taken into consideration. In 1996 they paid $800,000 and the construction permit was for $6.3 million just for the building. He believes there value is well within range for this property. He added he does not have a market study, because they are normally sold as a package deal. He added that after looking at their income, it was adjusted from $6.2 million. -Donna Fiala made a motion for denial of TP-140, based on a lack of sufficient evidence to support the petitioner's request. It was seconded by Mr. York. -Renee Lintin stated that when you look at the county's typical and actual income, they show it is lower than the value they come up with. The market shows $4.6 million and the actual shows $4.3 million, using their capitalization, therefore she did not understand why they are not relying on the income approach. -Mr. Skinner stated this is because they use replacement, income, and market value; the replacement cost was over $6million. They are obligated to consider all three approaches and that is what they did. -The motion for denial was recalled. All were in favor, the motion for denial of TP-140 passed unanimously, 5-0. 2) TP-146 Hines Prop. Tax Consult. (RSG Family Ltd), Parkway Plaza Replat Tract A -Chris Hienes, stated that this property has two parcels, the Kmart portion and the remainder of the center. He handed out a packet of information on the subject. Mr. Skinner stated he did not object to the information but they did not previously see the information. -Mr. Hienes stated that the income and expense information it deals with the entire center, including Kmart. The income has dropped $60,000 while expenses have gone down is well. The net operating income for 2000 was $731,768 it has dropped to $686,559 for 2001. The petitioner's are objecting to the increase in assessment due to a slight fall in income and Kmart is an anchor and currently suffering from financial difficulties. The owner's feel this poses a risk and causes a devaluation in the property's value. Pagel4 -Mr. Stephens stated he did not receive a copy of the income, and he would make no guarantees but requested to review it after the hearing. He added that Kmart is the anchor, but it is two separate pieces of property, this is done so Kmart can pay their own taxes. He explained it is hard to pull this one piece out, but he has made a meager approach to do so. He then discussed the comparables and the square footage cost. He stated that there is a third piece of property where the petitioner is adding new shopping areas and yet the petitioner states they are not doing well. He added that the comparables the petitioner used are not in Collier County, but the county's comparables are. They feel there value is well within reason. -Mr. Coletta made a motion for denial, based on the fact that there was not sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of the Property Appraiser. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. -Mr. Hienes stated that this is owned by Benderson Development Company. This company often goes in and attempts to liven a center, they have 8 properties in Collier County, and they base their opinion on how the property is doing, and it would be bought and sold on this same basis. -The motion for denial was recalled. All were in favor, the motion for denial passed unanimously, 5-0. 3) TP-135 Donald O'Hare, 520 Turtle Hatch Rd, Park Shore Unit 3 Blk 19 Lot 30 -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Skinner stated that this was a single family home. -Mr. Faerber stated that if the petitioners, who have the burden of proof, have not presented anything, then we have no option but to deny the petition. -Mr. Faerber made a motion for denial, based upon failing to meet any of the criteria of FL Statute 193.011 by the petitioner for burden of proof. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion for denial passed unanimously, 5-0. 4) TP-139 Red Lobster g444, 2355 N. US Hwy 41 -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Skinner stated they have appraised this as they have all other commercial properties and used all three approaches. Pagel5 -Mr. Faerber stated that failing to hear anything from the petitioner on TP-139, he moved for denial. It was seconded by Mr. York. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 5) TP-148 Caruthers & Assoc. Inc., Hilton Hotel-Naples TP-149 Caruthers & Assoc. Inc., Hilton Hotel-Naples -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens stated that this came up last year, petition 148 & 149 is on property that doesn't even exist. -Mr. Faerber stated failing to have property on TP-148, he moved to deny the petition. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion for denial passed unanimously, 5-0. -Mr. Faerber stated failing to have property on TP-149, he moved to deny the petition. R was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion for denial passed unanimously, 5-0. 7-) TP-150 Caruthers & Assoc. Inc., Baymont Inn & Suites -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens read a fax from the petitioner. It stated that they could not attend, and asked the board to consider the fact that the assessment is considerably less than current appraisal. It was signed Marty Zinderolf. -Mr. Stephens added he spoke to her Wednesday evening. He gave her a new assessment and she was happy, but stated that she would not withdraw the petition, and later sent the fax to his office. -Mr. Coletta made a motion to deny based on a lack of sufficient evidence to overturn the presumption of correctness on behalf of the property appraiser. It was seconded by Mr. Faerber. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 1) TP-151 Caruthers & Assoc. Inc., Hilton Hotel -Naples -The petitioner was not present. -Mr. Stephens said nothing was presented by the petitioner, last year they filed a lawsuit, but nothing had been provided on this petition. Page 16 October 3, 2002 -Mr. Faerber made a motion for denial, in light of the circumstances, these parties have presented nothing to overcome the presumptions set forth in the FL Statute 193.011, they have also failed to attend or provide paperwork other than the petition. It was seconded by Donna Fiala. All were in favor, the motion for denial passed unanimously, 5-0. THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS WERE NOT APPROPRIATELY AND/OR TIMELY FILED: A) Judith Jaffe, no filing fee and not on appropriate form and not notarized B) Henry Juenemann, untimely filed and not notarized C) Nick Benjacob, untimely filed and no filing fee D) Robert Kurimsky, not filed on appropriate form and not notarized E) Francis D. Hussey, Jr., untimely filed F) Ernie Benedetto representing Zannos Grekos & Athina Kyritsis, untimely filed G) JR' s Custom Cabinets of So. Fl., Inc. - untimely filed H) Mitchell G. Gobema, 6875 Friendship Land, untimely filed I) Kenneth B. Bloc, 6 Gulf Cottage Dr., untimely filed -Mr. Faerber made a motion for denial of A-I, because of the filing errors listed next to their names. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion of denial passed unanimously, 5-0. MOTION TO APPROVE CERTIFICATE FOR TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY -Donna Fiala made a motion to approve. It was seconded by Mr. Faerber. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. MOTION TO APPROVE CERTIFICATE FOR REAL PROPERTY -Donna Fiala made a motion to approve. It was seconded by Mr. Coyle. All were in favor, the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. SINE DIE - 12:25PM October 3' 2002 Page 17 VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD October 3, 2002 1 Jim Colletta, Chairman ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK These minutes approved by the Board on As presented or as corrected__ Page 18 161 1. Meeting called to order :2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of September 27, 2002 4. Landscape Maintenance Report 5. Landscape Architect's Report - Mike McGee t~. Transportation Landscape Services Report - Val Prince, Robert Petersen a. Current budget ?. Committee Members' Reports 8. Old Business New Business '10. Public Comments 1 '1. Adjournment 161 ! Golf Estates Beautificati°n Advisory Committee :Minutes - :Meeting of September 26, 2oo2 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS & MOTIONS Minutes of July 18, 2002: Bob Cole moved to accept the minutes as presented; seconded by Bill Erickson and carried unanimously. Minutes of August i5, 2002 meeting: Bob Cole moved to accept the minutes as presented; seconded by Bill Erickson and carded unanimously. 8. Transportation Road Maintenance Report Bo Bob Petersen reported that Sue Filson had sent over a memo listing 2 candidates for the vacant seats, but Bob Slebodnik pointed out that one of them, Charles Krout Jr., did not live in the district. Bob Slebodnik also explained that he had not received a notice that his term expired, but that he had been out of town and had his mail held, and that that may be the reason it was not received. He stated that he wished to remain a member of the committee, and that he would send Sue a letter stating this and updating his resume. Bill Erickson moved they retain Bob Slebodnik on the committee; seconded by Bob Cole. The motion passed 2-0 with one abstention. Bill Erickson then moved to accept Ron Torp as a new member of the committee; seconded by Bob Cole and carried unanimously. Golf :Estates Beautification Advisory Committee :Minutes- :Meeting of September 26, 2002 Meeting called to order at 4:15 pm. Location: Transportation Road Maintenance Conference Room Attendance Taken: Present - Robert Cole, Bill Erickson, and Bob Slebodnik, members; Bob Petersen and Val Prince, Transportation Road Maintenance; Gerald Morris, Collier County Traffic; Robert Kindelan, Commercial Land Maintenance; Mike McGee, McGee & Associates Absent: Robert Weyers, member; Jacqueline Silano, recording secretary. Minutes of July 18, 2002: Bob Cole moved to accept the minutes as presented; seconded by Bill Erickson and carded unanimously. Minutes of August 15, 2002 meeting: Bob Cole moved to accept the minutes as presented; seconded by Bill Erickson and carried unanimously. Landscape Maintenance Report A. Robert Kindelan reported normal maintenance. B. Bob Slebodnik asked about Pentas dying due to irrigation. Robert indicated new ones would go in next week, and the irrigation would be adjusted to give extra water. Road Construction Update Gerald Morris, reported on the Warren Street realignment. A discussion pursued about how it would affect the MSTU's current water source and the future mixing chamber that is planned. Landscape Architect's Report Mike McGee requested that the buttonwoods at the entranceway monuments be pruned, about 50% or so, also, to remove some branches form the Pandanus (Screw Pine). There were some oyster plants coming up in the beds and weeds that also need to be removed. The lantana needs to be hand pruned to level off. The liriope is being cut back, and the mulch needs to be turned. Mike also reported that there are some hollies showing decline in medians 5 and 6 on St. Andrews, and that we were attempting to find the cause. The area behind the monument on Baltrasol had high weeds, Bob Slebodnik will talk to Brad, the Golf Pro at the club about cutting it. Robert Kindelan said they would cut the area close to the monument. Bob Cole asked about mulch, it will be applied after the new fiscal year. Bob Slebodnik asked about red mulch. Bob Petersen felt it was not a viable alternative. Transportation Road Maintenance Report A. Val Prince reported on the budget, and that it was the end of the fiscal year. B. Bob Petersen reported that Sue Filson had sent over a memo listing 2 candidates for the vacant seats, but Bob Slebodnik pointed out that one of them, Charles Krout Jr., did not live in the district. Bob Slebodnik also explained that he had not received a notice that his term expired, but that he had been out of town and had his mail held, and that that may be the reason it was not received. He stated that he wished to remain a member of the committee, and that he would send Sue a letter stating this and updating his resume. Bill Erickson moved they retain Bob Slebodnik on the committee; seconded by Bob Cole. The motion passed 2-0 with one abstention. Bill Erickson then moved to accept Ron Torp as a new member of the committee; seconded by Bob Cole and carried unanimously. Committee Reports: none 10. Old Business A. Bob Slebodnik asked about water use, gph/zone. Robert Kindelan indicated that it had not been done yet, but would report on it at the next meeting. B. Bob Slebodnik asked about accident reports. Bob Petersen is to meet with Sheree in Risk Management to review the process. C. Discussion took place about the upgrade to the irrigation system. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 5:05 p.m. The next scheduled meeting will be held on Thursday, October 17th @ 4:00 p.m. at the Transportation Road Maintenance conference room on South Horseshoe Drive. £e£¥ ~eautification ~isor~j Committee 2 Sejgtem~er 26~ 2002 COLLIER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING OR~ANiZATi~ 161 1 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2685 SOUTH HORSESHOE DRIVE, SUITE 211 TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION NAPLES, FL 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT (239) 403-2310 FAX: (239) 213-5815 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Members, News Media and Other Interested Parties / Robert M. Herrington, MPO Manager ~/~ November 8, 2002 Meeting November 1, 2002 Attached, please find an agenda/agenda packet for the November 8, 2002, MPO meeting to be held at the Collier County Government Center, Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Building "F", 3ra Floor, Naples, Florida at 10:00 a.m. Should you have any questions regarding this meeting, please feel free to contact our office. RMH:tlc Attachments All meetings of the MPO Board are open to the public. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting should contact the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 48 hours prior to the meeting by calling (239) 403-23 i0. L,,o~,. Corres: Rem# Copies To: 161 AGENDA Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization Collier County Government Center Building "F", 3rd Floor Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room Naples, Florida November 8, 2002 10:00 a.m. This meeting of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is open to the public and citizen input is encouraged. Any person wishing to speak on any scheduled item may do so upon recognition by the Chairperson. Any person desiring to have an item placed on the agenda shall make a request in writing, with a description and summary of the item, to the MPO Manager or the MPO Chair 14 days prior to the date of the next scheduled meeting of the MPO. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this committee will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. 1. Call to Order A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call 2. Aooroval of the Agenda 3. MPO Manager's Report ('To be Distributed at Meeting) Committee Chairman's Report Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Report Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Report Pathway Advisory Committee (PAC) Report 5. .Open to the Public Consent Section A. Approval of October 11, 2002 Meeting Minutes J Board Action B. C. D. Approval of the Amended Collier County Public Involvement Plan Approval of the Prioritized Pathway Project List for FY 2002-2003 Approval of the FDOT' s Draft Tentative Work Program for FY 2003/04-2007/08 Annual Appointment of a Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC) Representative Appointment of a Southwest Florida Transportation Subcommittee Representative ge Reports and Presentations Co (May Require Board Action) FDOT Report Review of the Collier County MPO Long-Range Transportation Plan Amendment Procedures Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) Update 9. Other Business 10. Next Meeting Date The next regular MPO Board meeting is tentatively scheduled to be held on December 13, 2002, at 10:00 a.m. at the Collier County Board of County Commission Chambers. 11. Ad. lournment All meetings of the MPO Board are open to the public. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiting special accommodations to participate in this meeting should contact the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 48 hours prior to the meeting by calling (239) 403-2310. Fiala Carter Her~ing Coyle Coletta TO: FROM: bATE: MEMORANDUM Kathleen Martinson, Administrative Aide to BCC Sam Tucker, Executive Aide to BCC ~ October 28,200;~ RE: Community Character/Smart Growth Advisory Committee Agenda and Minutes ~[ am submitting the following Agenda and Minutes of the Community Character/Smart Growth Advisory Committee to be filed by your office. 1. Agenda and Minutes of ,Tune 26*h, 2002. 2. Agenda and Minutes of September 18th, 2002. Please be advised: there were no meetings in ,Tuly or August of 2002. Thank You, Sam Tucker Executive Aide to BCC ~,~Jsc. Corres: Item// ) L~ Copies 1'o: COMMUNITY CHARACTER/SMART GROWT,U ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MEETING DATE: MEETING TIME: LOCATION: Wednesday, June 26th, 2002 2:00 pm Collier County Government Domestic Animal Services Building 7610 Davis Boulevard - Conference Room off of Lobby Naples, FL :34104 II. III. III. CALL TO ORDER - Roll Call APPROVAL OF MINUTES: a. Smart Growth Sub-Committee minutes of June 12, 2002. b. Minutes of regular meeting of May 22, 2002. Update from Sub-Committee by Mike Bauer Handouts: a. Smart Growth Checklist b. San Diego Municipal Code Urban Village Overlay c. Multifamily Housing (from HGTV Website; Real Estate & Finance) d. Introducing Russell Budd, The Naples Chambers New Chairman of the Board e. From Highway to My Way (from the Flexible Design Standards for Communities by Rutgers University) f. Getting to Smart Growth - I00 Policies for Implementation (book) Update from Barb Cacchione VI. OTHER Community Character/Smart rowth Advisory Committee Minutes of Tune 26, 2002 II. III. IV. Meeting called to order by Chairman, Jim Rideoutte at 2:12 p.m. Members present: Sam Noe, Jim Rideoutte, Sally Barker, Bruce Anderson, Mike Bauer, Kathy Prosser, Ellin Goetz. Absent: Jim Lucas, Bill West, Mark Morton. Staff: Sam Tucker, Barb Cacchione. Approval of Minutes: a. No approval of Sub-committee minutes of June 12, 2002. b. Minutes of regular meeting of May 22, 2002. Motion by Bruce Anderson, seconded by Mike Bauer. Approved. Update on Smart Growth Sub-Committee by Mike Bauer The sub-committee would like to change the Naples "power center", which is the four corners at the intersection of Airport Pulling Road and Pine Ridge Road, to more of a "Town Center". Group to evaluate the area at next sub-committee meeting and make recommendations to include Smart Growth concepts. Mike explained each of the handouts provided by the Smart Growth sub-committee: Smart Growth Checklist, San Diego Municipal Code Overlay, Smart Growth: 100 Policies For Implementing Smart Growth. Barb Cacchione: Handout: Growth Management Plan Amendments Suggested that the "architectural standards" should be handled by a separate consultant and that the Rural Areas and Golden Gates Estates areas be handled by their own committees, rather than our committee focusing on them. Recommended prioritizing: 1. Urban Area 2. Future Land Use Elements (FLUE) 3. Thoroughfare plan - work with Transportation Department. Don Scott, Transportation Planning Director is currently doing a study on "secondary collective road systems in an urban area". He will be available in September to speak to our group. 4. Recreation and open space - Mike Bauer suggested we work with the group "Vote Conservation 2002" on open space issues. VI. VII. VIII. The group agrees that Barb should develop language for consideration into the Land Development Code which states: C-1 through C-4 zoning will allow residential uses as permitted above the first floor commercial space. Motion to approve by Bruce Anderson, seconded by Mike Bauer. Unanimously approved. The future committee meetings will be scheduled according to when Barb has language to discuss with us. Sam Noe on the Smart Growth Sub-Committee: a. Set principles and policies b. No selection of work areas allowed until principles are defined and agreed upon c. Present list of deliverable to regular Community Character Committee Next meeting: Wednesday, August 14th, 2002 at 2:00 p.m. in the Supervisor of Elections Building Training Room. IX. Meeting adjourned. COMMUNITY CHARACTER/SMART GROWTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MEETING DATE: MEETING TIME: LOCATION: September 18th, 2002 2:00 pm Supervisor of Elections Training Room Collier County Government Complex 3301 E. Tamiami Trial Naples, FL 34112 II. III. IV. VI. VII. VIII. IX. Roll Call Approval of Minutes: June 26, 2002 meeting. Presentation of East Naples, Bob Murray Review of schedule and work programs. Discussion of a possible presentation at the BCC Workshop in early October to review work plan and to request a separate cycle for LDC and Comp Plan Amendments. LDC Amendments current cycle Agenda for next meeting Schedule for future meetings Adjournment 16[ 1 Community Character/Smart Growth Advisory Committee Minutes of September 18, 2002 II. III. Meeting called to order by Chairman, Jim Rideoutte at 2:05 p.m. Members present: Mark Morton, Mike Bauer, Sam Noe, Jim Rideoutte, Bruce Anderson. Members absent: EIlin Goetz, Kathy Prosser, Jim Lucas, Bill West, Sally Barker, Pat Pochopin, Gordon Watson. Staff: Sam Tucker, Barb Cacchione, Aaron Blair of Planning Services, Tom Tomerlin of Planning Services, Commissioner Tom Henning. Other: Bob Murray, Myrna Correa, Jack Mischung, Lance Woodward, Ron Cummings all of East Naples Civic Association. Debrah Forester. Minutes of June 26, 2002 NOT approved, quorum not present. Presentation by Bob Murray of East Naples Civic Association a. March 12, 2002 - presentation to BCC: BCC directed staffto move forward implementing study for East Naples. b. September 10, 2002 - BCC approved funding for Dover Kohl study in Naples Manor. c. Home Owners Associations trying to change their community, ENCA supports HOAs d. East Naples needs community redevelopment i. Ingress/egress ii. Community center iii.Parking facilities e. Scoping - 7.4 miles along the East Trail "East Corridor" has begun f. Also needs addressing: i. Architectural standards ii. Boarded buildings iii.Combine business traffic g. Jim Mudd speaking at the next ENCA luncheon on Development Efforts of the County on Corridor 41. h. Everyone is invited to a FREE Wine and Cheese Social, sponsored by the ENCA on October 30th at 6:00 pm at the First National Bank on the East Trail. The theme is "Let's Come Together" i. In their efforts to rebuild East Naples, ENCA would like to involve Chief Shank and Sheriff Hunter. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. Please note that Gary Davis of the Conservancy is in attendance in Kathy Prosser's Barb Cacchione, Handouts provided: a. Towards Better Places: Collier County Community Character Plan matrix, updated b. Memo to committee members from Barb Cacchione c. Course of Action matrix/priorities d. Growth Management Plan Amendment/LDC Cycles e. Scope of Services Advisory Committee to request their own cycle for LDC amendments at the October LDC Workshop, Chairman to present to board. Barb suggests a sub-contractor for Architectural standards. Community Development Block Grant should apply to sidewalk installation in Naples Manor ...... one way streets in Naples Manor (another suggested idea). Commissioner Henning suggested an MSTU for East Naples. County should hire firm to review commercial standards; committee to help with writing the language. Next meeting Tuesday, October 15th, 2002 at 2:00 pm, County Manager's Conference Room, Administrative Building, Second Floor. November meeting on Thursday, the 14th at 2:00 pm, Supervisor of Elections Building. 1 XII. Adjournment at 3:52 pm. 'le " DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA November 6, 2002 3:30 p.m. I. Approval of Agenda- Minutes- October 2, 2002 Meeting II. Staff Announcements A. Transportation Division Update B. Public Utilities Division Update III. Old Business A. V. Subcommittee Reports A. Land Development Regulation (Bob Duane) B. Construction Code (Dino Longo) C. Utility Code (Tom Masters) D. Ad Hoc Committee on Fees VI. New Business A. Presentation of Revised Right-Of-Way Permit Fees and Lane Use Fee B. LDC Division 3.15 Adequate Public Facilities VII. Committee Member Comments 1_61 '1_~ MINUTES October 2, 2002 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE DEFELOP~E~N IT 1 SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, October 2, 2002 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Development Services Advisory Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on October 2, 2002 this date at 9:30 AM in REGULAR SESSION IN Conference room "E" at 2800 Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: ALSO PRESENT: CHAIRMAN: Dino Longo Marco Espinar Bob Mulhere Blair Foley Brian Jones Herb Savage Tom Peek Robert Duane Thomas Masters Brian Milk Kay Deselem Patrick White Mike Bosi Don Schneider Ross Gochemer Susan Murray Vince Barraco Deborah Forester Ron Nino October 2, 2002 Chairman Dino Longo called the meeting to order at 9:35 AM. A quorum was established with no official Agenda He stated the purpose of the meeting is to review the Land Development Code Amendments. He started with Page 1 of the Handout. He asked for comments on: Zoning Districts. Tony Pires asked Susan about the Car Wash. She mentioned setbacks were the same. Comments on: Zoning Districts-Estates Districts. It was stated there was a split recommendation concerning this issue. Page 9 was discussed about frontage lots - wondering if there can be two local roads if a through lot. Kay Deselem showed a map explaining the lots backing up to oil well road and have frontage on local road - no two local roads. At this time Chairman Dino welcomed Mr. Robert Mulhere to the Committee as a new member. Dino asked about: Zoning Districts-Commercial Districts. Zoning Districts-Vanderbilt Beach Residential Tourist District Supplemental District Regulations-Guesthouse Mr. Peek made it part of the record that he has a conflict of interest voting on this issue. He owns property that has a guest house in the Estates area. He filed his form identifying his conflict. In his opinion he didn't feel that the renting of guesthouses in those districts are illegal and not in the best interest of the County. Mr. Savage agreed. Mr. Peek would like to vote on that/particular issue separately so he can abstain but will vote on the remainder. Discussion followed on the guesthouse issue. This Amendment isn't a change but was inadvertently omitted for 11 years. Marco voted against this amendment in sub-committee because a guest house is an allowable use, and stated that when there is money given for the use of the guest house the County says it is not allowed. He does not see the logic. Mr. Patrick White, Assistant County Attorney said that whoever occupies that guesthouse is intended to occupy it on a non- permitted basis, less than a six month term. It is a guest house - not a rental. Mr. Peek wondered if this type of conversation may have occurred 11 years ago when this amendment was not included at that time. Mr. Ross Gochemer - Planning Services mentioned that this amendment was strictly intended to be an addition to language which they believed was inadvertently omitted from the 1982 Code. He read from the Code for the Committee. They are trying to bring Agricultural and State Zoning in line with guesthouse on residential property. There was- 2 October 2, 2002 never any intent of addressing the renting of guesthouses. Mr. Mulhere felt the definition should be included with the Amendment when the final decisions are made. Thomas Masters moved to approve the Supplemental District Regulations Guesthouse amendment as is to get the consistently and the Board make a policy change if they are going to allow rentals in the rules and look into it further. Seconded Robert Duane. 3 Yes - 6 No - ! Abstention (Peek) Tom Peek moved to approve the Zoning Districts - Vanderbilt Beach Residential Tourist District. Seconded Blair Foley. Carried unanimously. Tony Pires moved to approve the Commercials Districts, Estates District and Zoning Districts. Seconded Blair Foley. Carried Unanimously Tony Pires had a question on the Enforcement-Notice and Appeal concerning pending violations, stop work-orders and narrowing of applet rights. Mr. Patrick White noted this is a violation of the LDC. He is trying to fit the right remedy into the right entity. He is trying to prevent circumstances in which they could be sued by an adjacent property owner. Can't have two separate lists of violations. Tony has a problem with the way it is written. Tony Pires moved that the language for the Enforcement-Notice and Appeal as proposed not be approved and recommend it be changed. (Have the articulation now in this cycle of where the various applet remedies can be found). Seconded Herb Savage. Discussion followed in defining the different codes and particular language possibly added. Vote - 5 Yes - 5 No - motion fails. Bob Mulhere moved to approve the staff recommendation of the Enforcement- Notice and Appeals Amendment. Seconded Robert Duane. 8 Yes - 3 No - Carried The second page of the handout was discussed briefly. Wording concerning rental and owner occupied was also discussed. All condos are privately owned, unless it is a governmental entity, no other type of ownership applies so suggests appropriately striking through condominiums and inserting owner occupied. Robert Duane noted to the Committee that there were several of the items that they included or deleted certain wording, language and or changed in some way. On page 50 deviations from the fire code were discussed. Bob Mulhere moved to amend the language of this section as proposed and recommended by the sub-committee with additional comments that there should be some identification of the fiscal impacts. October 2, 2002 Seconded Blair Foley. Ron Nino - WCI spoke concerning deviations on page 10 of the report. A regulation concerning a PUD is a regulation. He suggested they consider deleting the last additions to the last paragraph. Bob amended his motion to include revising #10, and also amending #10 to eliminate the requirement - deviations be noted on the Master Plan. Blair seconded the Amended Motion. Carried Unanimously. Mr. Robert Mulhere left at 10:30 AM. Blair Foley moved to approve the other three conditions recommended by the sub- committee on page 2 of the Summary Sheet. Seconded Tom Peek. Carried Unanimously. Blair Foley moved to approve all items on page 3 of the Summary Sheet. Seconded Tom Peek. Carried Unanimously. Tony Pires moved to approve all items on page 4 of the Summary Sheet. Seconded Tom Peek. Carried Unanimously. Susan Murray asked the committee to review a language change for the Page 5 summary on Section 3.3.10 - Site Development Plans - Site Development Plan time limits. The Committee discussed the second paragraph concerning the SDP approval letter and extensions granted. Brian Milk moved to maintain the amendment as is with the strike-outs (ref. Page 5.) Tom Peek Seconded. Discussion continued. / Carried Unanimously - motion denied. Brian Milk moved to approve all the sections on Page 5 of the Summary Sheet. Seconded Robert Duane. Carried Unanimously. Blair Foley moved to approve all items on Page 6 of the Summary Sheet. Seconded Tom Peek. Carried Unanimously. Tony Pires moved to approve all items on Page 7 of the Summary Sheet. Seconded Marco Espinar. Carried Unanimously. Tony Pires and Blair Foley noted they will abstain from voting on Section 3.13.8. Tom Peek moved to approve Section 3.13.8. 4 October 2, 2002 Seconded Brian Milk. Carried - 7-Yes l-No 161 Tom Peek moved to approve the last two sections on Groundwater Protection Applicability. Seconded Marco Espinar. Carried Unanimously. Tom Peek moved to approve the Sections on page 9 of the Summary Sheet. Seconded Tom Masters. Carried Unanimously. Robert Duane abstained and would like the Sections broken out. Tom Peek moved to approve Section 6.3 on page 9 & 10 of the Summary Sheet. Seconded Herb Savage. Carried Unanimously. Tom Masters moved to approve the Wellfield Protection Zones Maps on page 10 of the Summary Sheet. Seconded Marco Espinar. Carried Unanimously. Tom Masters moved to approve as amended Section 2.2.20 on page 10 of the Summary Sheet. Seconded Brian Milk. Carried with 1 Abstention -Robert Duane. Robert Duane moved to ~approve the item the Sub-committee approved yesterday according to their hand6ut which is Section 2.7.5 Variance Procedures/ Seconded Tom Peek. Carried Unanimously. Tom Peek asked that meetings be scheduled a month in advance and the Committee be notified as to that date, time and place. Robert Duane asked that Susan come up with some creative changes to the Section 2.7.3.4 concerning the PUD Procedures and notify the Committee. Tom Peek made note that he will not be attending the November meeting. Patrick White mentioned the Committee submits the annual report summary by end of the year. Meeting adjourned 10:55 AM. NEW BUSINESS Memorandum 161 1 To: From: Date: Subject: The Development Services Advisory Committee Edward J. Kant, P.E. ~ Transportation Operations Director October 22, 2002 Briefing Paper on Proposed Increase for Right-of-way Permit Fees We are proposing to raise fees for all permits and to impose fees for services not previously charged based on the Board's stated direction to make the Section economically self-sufficient. Based on permit activity over the four-month period from April 1 through July 31, we anticipate collecting under 50% of the cost of providing the services rendered to the public by the Right-of- way Permitting and Inspection Section. Beginning-in June 2001, the responsibility for issuing right-'of-way permits was transferred from the Community Development and Environmental Services Division's Engineering Services Department to the Transportation Services Division's Transportation Operations Department. That responsibility was taken on with a single person and no clerical support. The only roads for which we became responsible at that time were the major arterial roadways with the exception of 1-75 and all other State roads. In April 2002, right-of-way pe2'rnitting for all roads in Collier County came under the responsibility of the Transportation Operations Department. To adequately service this function, we structured the Right-of-way Permitting and Inspection Section as a major component of the Transportation Operations Department. There is a Section Manager, Mitch Riley, P.E., an Administrative Assistant, Terd Meyer, three Project Managers rather than initial one, Larry Henry, Mark Burtchin and A. Korti, and an Engineering Technician, Ed Zacka. An additional Project Manager position has been provided for in the FY 2003 budget, pending final budget approvals. Attached is an organization chart for the Section along with a list of the typical duties for the personnel assigned to the Section. In addition to issuing right-of-way permits, this Section performs all Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) reviews, inspects all work performed under the permits issued and sets grades for single- family and two-family home driveways. There is significantly more involved in the permitting function than merely providing the intake and issuing a Permit. Among the tasks required for each permit, regardless of whether for a residential structure or a commercial building, are: Transportation Operations Department Development Services Advisory Committee October 22, 2002 161 l Page 2 of 4 Log in, engineering review, MOT review, travel time for inspections and inspection time, permit closeout and filing. In addition, residential permits require a stakeout for driveway grades and commercial permits require a verification of as-built conditions and multiple inspections. The following "quick look" at our activity over the past four months will provide a window into the scope of this activity: Month Permits Issued Walk-ins April 208 39 May 207 83 June 180 87 July 185 80 Au g u st 248 71 September 182 9~4 Average 173 65 Based on the number of current personnel and the available hours for those personnel, additional staff may be needed to provide the same level of service to keep up with continued growth. The following table documents this issue: Permit Type Permits issued/year. Average time/Permit Total time Residential 1800 3 hours 5,400 hours Commercial 500 12 hours 6,000 hours Misc. 100 2 hours 200 hours / Estimated total hours required: 11,600 HOURS Based on current staffing, there are about 10,680 hours available annually (6 people X 1780 hours/person), without overtime. In addition to the basic permitting services, we are performing significantly more work to assure that the various contractors working within Collier County's rights-of-way keep MOT as specified in their permits. To this end, there are many hours spent reviewing MOT in the field and responding to complaints about inadequate MOT. This added emphasis on MOT is consistent with the CAA 5807, Maintenance of Traffic as set forth in the Practices and Procedures Handbook (the Collier County "Green Book"). It is not unusual for any one of our Project Managers or Technicians to have to travel from one end of the county to the other just to keep up with the flow of work and to maintain the standards that the building industry has requested to assure that they are not unnecessarily held up in the pursuit of their goals. Transportation Services Department Development Services Advisory Committee October 22, 2002 Page 3 of 4 To comply with that direction and to offset the approximate $510,000 annual cost for the Section, we have proposed the following fee schedule: TYpe Right-of-way Construction Renewal of unexpired or incomplete permit Re-inspection - First Second Th/rd All subsequent inspections Jack-and-Bore Open-cut Construction Sprinkler Head Placement in R/W Turn Lane Construction After-the-Fact Permit -Existine Fee Residential or Non-residential Proposed Fee Residential (No distinction made in current fee schedule) $125.00 $ 250.00 $ 600.00 $50.00 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 $50.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $75.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $100.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $100.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $170.00 $ 250.00 $ 500.00 $235.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 $25.00 $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $125.00+$50/day insp. Fee N/A N/A 4 X Normal Fee ($1000 max) 4 X Normal Fee ($6000.00 max) Non-resi____dential Small* Large* $1500.00 $ 750.00 $ 100.00 $ 150.00 $ 200.00 $ 250.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 $ 250.00 $1500.00' * Right-of-way Permit Notes: Small Commercial Development shall be defined as a non-residential (single-family or duplex) project generating 600 vehicles trips per day or less. Large Commercial Development shall be defined as a non-residential (single-family or duplex) project generating greater than 600 trips per day. A right-of-way use f~ of $800.00 per day shall apply to all non-residential projects requiring a lane closure on a major roadway. A major roadway is defined herein as being one of the following Collier County maintained roadways: Roadway Name ,From T_.qo Immokalee Road Tamiarni Trail North (US 41) Collier Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Tarnlami Trail North (US 41) Collier Boulevard Pine Ridge Road Tarniarni Trail North (US 41) Collier Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Tarn/ami Trail North (US 41) Collier Boulevard Radio Road Airport Road Davis BoUlevard Rattlesnake Hanmxock Road Tarn/ami Trail East (US 41) Collier Boulevard US 41 East Davis Boulevard Collier Boulevard US 41 North Lee County Line Creech Road Goodlette-Frank Road Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Immokalee Road Airport Road Tamiami Trail East (US 41) ln~mokalee Road Livingston Road Radio Road Lee County l,i~e Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard Green Boulevard Logan Boulevard Green Boulevard Lee County Line Collier Boulevard Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Lee County Line Transportation Services Department Development Services Advisory Committee October 22, 2002 Page 4 of 4 161 4. The minimum right-of-way use fee shall be for a two-day duration ($1,600.00). No refunds of unused fees shall be allowed. 5. Lane use fees shall be calculated by Collier County and shall be due and payable at the time of permit application if a permit is issued. If a Notice of Intent to Issue a permit is provided by the County in lieu of a permit, then the lane use fee shall be due and payable at the time of issuance of the actual permit. 6. A discount to the right-of-way use fee will apply for work performed during the months of April through January. The discount will be 50% ($400 per day) during the months of January and April, 75% ($200 per day) during the months of May and December', and 87½% ($100 per day) during the months of June through November. The calculation of any discount shall be based upon the actual start date or completion date of construction. 7. If work continues beyond the originally estimated lane use period, then additional lane use fees shall be due and payable within two working days of notice to the Permittee of such additional fees. Failure to provide the additional fees to the County within three working days of such notice shall be cause for the project to be "red-tagged" and shut down. Lane use fees shall continue to accrue during any period of shutdown and shall be added to the additional lane use fees calculated by Collier County. 8. Additional lane use fees as calculated under Note 5 above shall be assessed at the rate of 150% per day for the additional period. If a third extension of the permit is required, then such extension shall be computed at the rate of 200% per day of such extension. Charges for any period of suspension shall accrue at the higher rate. The foregoing fee schedule is predicated on all support costs for the Right-of-way Permitting and Inspection Section (personnel and equipment) being derived from Permit fees rather than from right-of-way use fees. All fund~ collected as right-of-way use fees shall be accounted for in a separate revenue account and shall be made available for Transportation System Management enhancement projects. These types of projects may include, but are not limited to, lengthening of existing mm lanes, addition of new turn lanes, median modifications, traffic signal timing adjustments, pedestrian crossing enhancements, etc. CC: James V. Mudd, County Manager Leo Ochs, assistant County Manager Norman E. Feder, AICP, Transportation Administrator Mitch Riley, P.E., Permitting and Inspection Section Manager Connie Deane, Transportation Services Division Community Liaison File: Permits (Fee Structure) Attachments as stated: Organization Chart for Permitting and Inspection Section List of duties for permitting personnel Transportation Services Department Mitch Riley, P.E., Section Manager Residential ~61 · Assist walk in customers when an issue arises and staffneeds a decision Help with engineering & code enforcement questions from staff · Assist with citizens who wish to speak with me regarding an issue or a problem · Perform field work when necessary or shorthanded Utilities/Commercial · Make an engineering judgment call when asked by the reviewers for assistance · Help with engineering analysis and code verifications · Review & issue some permits Commercial (SDP-AR) · Review applications and file in the system · Make initial contact with the applicant if obvious errors on plans · Perform a thorough review & analysis once SDP is approved · 'Review the MOT and approve/contact the permittee to modify · Issue permit and notify inspectors · Field check & inspect some permits Management &Administrative duties · Always available to assist staff · Hold regular staff meetings to share information and ideas · Prepare a list of responsibilities & duties (Key Result Area) for each staff member · Evaluate performance on a regular basis · Distribute workload logically and fairly · Prepare quarterly reports on the Section's progress · Modify, enhance, and refine the permitting process & procedures · Report on the Section's performance to the Director on a regular basis · Prepare budget for the Section · Monitor revenue & 6~perating cost for budget projections Residential Terri Meyer, Administrative Assistant 161 · Assist walk in customers · Assign new permit numbers in Prowler (County's network database) · Do receipt in CD Plus (database) for fee · Check CD Plus for correct address and strap information · Enter all permit information · Print ROW Permit card for field work · After received back fi.om Project Manager/Inspector, a formal driveway form is completed · Update permits to be issued including expiration date · Copy permits · If Building Permit number attached, send a copy of the driveway card, driveway form, and septic tank survey to Building dept. · Mail out permit or call permittee for pickup · File Utilities/Commercial · Track Sprint permits for payment of days in the row · Assign new permit number in Prowler · Do receipt in CD Plus for any Utilities received with permit fee · Do Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Invoice for fee for internal Utility permits and mail out · Enter all permit information · After review by Project Manager and approval, update permits to be issued including expiration date · Mail out or call permittee for pickup · File Commercial (SDP-AR) · Assign new permit application numbers in Prowler · Do receipt in CD Plus, deposit check, and mail out permittee's Official Receipt · Enter all permit information · Enter row permit number in CD Plus for Transportation Engineer's review · Enter permit informatioff'into SDP Tracking Log · After SDP is approved and approval by Project Manager, update permits to be issued including expiration date · Mail out permit or call permittee for pickup · File Miscellaneous Administrative work · Enter data in Survey Log · Track permits in Permit Log · Track BCC Invoices · Do BCC Invoices for internal customers · Pay invoices · Budget updates · Calculate total permit fees · Issue refund memos · Assist with KRA and evaluations · Payroll Larry Henry, Project Manager Commercial · · · · · · · Review applications and file in the system Make initial contact with the applicant if obvious errors on plans Perform a through review & analysis once SDP is aPProved to assure all codes, guidelines, and specifications have been followed properly Review the MOT and approve/contact the permittee to modify Review some items with the Section Manager to assure consistency Issue Permit Field Check and inspect the MOT as submitted Inspect the actual construction in the ROW Perform final inspection to verify as-built accuracy Close out permit Utilities · Review permit application for work to be performed in the ROW · Review and approve, disapproVe, or modify MOT · Contact the applicant to make revisions if necessary · Meet the applicant in the field if necessary to complete permit application Misc. · Advise other departments of MOT deficiencies/hazardous conditions/items to be corrected on daily trips · Assist in any tasks out of the daily routine to assure smooth operation · Inspect and report on caJls from the Section Manager and the Department Director · Assist walk in customers when needed Mark Burtchin, Project Manager Residential Determine if the access point location is public or private · Determine if a site visit is necessary or not · Determine the pipe size, flow direction, and set inverts · Draw up sketch for the Administrative Assistant to log into the system · Set grades with the engineering technician assistance in the field · Verify the accuracy of the work produced by the engineering technician · Follow up on inquiries by the applicants, revisit sites, conduct courtesy meetings and inspections · Conduct £mal inspection for permit close out Commercial · Review applications and file in the system · Make initial contact with the applicant if obvious errors on plans · Perform a thorough review & analysis once SDP is approved to assure all codes, guidelines, and specifications have been followed properly Review the MOT and approve/contact the permittee to modify Review some items with the Section Manager to assure consistency Issue Permit Field Check and inspect the MOT as submitted Inspect the actual construction in the ROW Perform final inspection to verify as-built accuracy Close out permit /' Utilities · Review permit application for work to be performed in the ROW · Review and approve, disapprove, or modify MOT · Contact the applicant to make revisions if necessary · Meet the applicant in the field if necessary to complete permit application Misc. · Advise other departments of MOT deficiencies/hazardous conditions/items to be corrected on daily trips · Assist in any tasks out of the daily routine to assure smooth operation · Inspect and report on calls from the Section Manager and the Department Director Korti, Project Manager Residential · Determine if the access point location is public or private Determine if a site visit is necessary or not · Determine the pipe size, flow direction, and set inverts Draw up sketch for the Administrative Assistant to log into the system Set grades with the engineering technician assistance in the field · Verify the accuracy of the work produced by the engineering technician · Follow up on inquiries by the applicants, revisit sites, conduct courtesy meetings and inspections · Conduct final inspection for permit close out Commercial · Review applications and file in the system · Make initial contact with the applicant if obvious errors on plans · Perform a thorough review & analysis once SDP is approved to assure all codes, guidelines, and specifications have been followed properly ~ · Review the MOT and approve/contact the permittee to modify · Review some items with the Section Manager to assure consistency · Issue Permit · Field Check and inspect the MOT as submitted · Inspect the actual construction in the ROW · Perform final inspection to verify as-built accuracy · Close out permit / Utilities · Review permit application for work to be performed in the ROW · Review and approve, disapprove,, or modify MOT · Contact the applicant to make revisions if necessary · Meet the applicant in the field if necessary to complete permit application Misc. · Advise other departments of MOT deficiencies/hazardous conditions/items to be corrected on daily trips · Assist in any tasks out of the daily routine to assure smooth operation · Inspect and report on calls from the Section Manager and the Department Director Ed Zacka, Engineering Technician Scheduling & routing the daily fieldwork (Residential Permits only) by map and legal descriptions Assist Project Managers to set grades and size drainage pipes for residential driveways Assist in setting up temporary Bench Mark in the field for all driveway permit requests on a daily basis Assist in conducting courtesy inspections as required Assist in conducting final inspections to close out permits Review some permits for conformance with the current codes and Collier County Ordinance 93-64 (Standard of Construction in ROVV) Assist in preparing maps, research, field check MOT and anything else project managers might need help with 1(-.I 1 CCPC LDC Cycle 2 First Hearing, Wednesday, October 23, 2002 Division 3.15 Adequate Public Facilities 1"- CCPC Recommended Changes, Corrections, Policy Issues Section 3.15.3.3: Staff was directed to review alternatives to the proposed "10 months excluding February and March" traffic count methodology, including retention of the current methodology. Section 3.15.3.21: Change the references throughout Division 3.15 to "final local development order" where the new definition including final subdivision plat, final site development plan or building permit is intended. Section 3.15.7.3.1.1: A policy issue was raised as to the retention of the provision for a "waiver and release" option in lieu of a COA at final SDP, or final subdivision plat approval. Staff has proposed that the "waiver and release" option be removed. Section 3.15.7.3.2.2: Change the payment of impact fees due from, at the time of COA and final local development order application submittal to, at the time of issuance of the final local development order. Section 3.15.7.3.2.5: A policy issue was raised on the current provision for expiration of COA's in 3 years. If the concurrency test is now going to be applied and impact fees collected at the SDP or final subdivision plat, should a COA be valid for a longer period than 3 or 5 years? Staff is exploring alternative timeframes with legal counsel and industry representatives for consideration at the next hearing. Section 3.15.7.3.4.2: Staff was directed to evaluate other official COA approval notification methods in addition to "facsimile" in consideration of applicants who may not have ready access to receive timely notification by fax machine. ORIGIN: Community Development & Environmental Services Div./ Transportation Services Division AUTHOR: Stan Litsinger, Comprehensive Planning Manager/ Donald Scott, Director, Transportation Planning DEPARTMENT: Planning Services/Transportation Planning LDC PAGE: LDC3:162.5-182.7 LDC SECTION: Division 3.15 CHANGE: This is a comprehensive rewrite of the County LDC implementing the adequate public facilities regulatory and monitoring policies adopted in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Changes include revisions to Level of Service Standards (LOS); redefinition of a final local development order; the timing of the calculation and collection of impact fees; application content, timing, process, notification and issuance of a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy (COA) in conjuction with the issuance of a final local development order; redefinition of roads operating conditions, Collier peak hour traffic measurement, traffic analysis thresholds, criteria for designation of Areas of Significant Influence (ASI), and "de minimis" traffic impact; and providing for a certification of transportation impact vesting process for previously approved planned unit developments (PUD) and subdivisions which are not statutorily vested. REASON: The BCC has adopted amendments to the GMP and given staff policy direction to revise the concurrency management system to measure, analyze, and plan for the impacts of new development on public facilities at earlier stages in the land development process, and to collect and apply impact fees concurrently. FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS: Impact fees will be deposited directly into the Consolidated Impact Fee Trust Funds at the time of approval and/or issuance of final SDP, subdivision plat or building permit (final impact fees due will be determined at building permit based on the impact fee schedule in affect at that time). Funds associated with new development would be available for appropriation by the BCC for public facilities in the next Annual Budget. Additional staff and analytical systems may 161 be required which may require adjustment to the various fees charged for review and processing of applications. RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: Division 3.2;Division 3.3;Article 4 Amend the LDC as follows: DIVISION 3.15. ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES* 1 *Code reference--Adequate public facilities ordinance, § 106-71 et seq. State law reference(s)--Concurrency, F.S. § 163.3180. Sec. 3.15.1. Short title, authority and applicability. 3.15.1.1. Short title. This division shall be known and may be cited as the "Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance." 3.15.1.2. Authority. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County has the authority to adopt this division pursuant to Article VIII, Section l(f), Fla. Const., F.S. § 125.01 et. seq., F.S. § 163.3161 et. seq., F.S. § 163.3161(8), F.S. §§ 163.3177(10)(h) and F.S. § 163.3202(2)(g), and Rule 9J-5, F.A.C. 3.15.1.3. Applicability. This division shall apply to all development in the total unincorporated area of Collier County, and to all public facilities owned by Collier County in the incorporated or unincorporated areas of Collier County, and to all privately-owned public facilities where the level of service has been established by the county. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.1.) Sec. 3.15.2. Intent and purpose. 3.15.2.1. Intent. This division is intended to implement and be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan, F.S. § 163.3161 et. seq., and Rule 9J-5, F.A.C., by ensuring that all development in Collier County be served by adequate public facilities. 3.15.2.2. Purpose. This objective is accomplished by (1) establishing a management and monitoring system to evaluate and coordinate the timing and provision of the necessary public facilities to service development, and (2) by establishing a regulatory program that ensures that each public facility is available to serve development concurrent with when the impacts of development occur on the public facilities. 161 3.15.2.3. Minimum requirements. The provisions of this division in their interpretation and application are declared to be the minimum requirements necessary to accomplish the stated intent, purposes, and objectives of this division. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.I.) Sec. 3.15.3. Definitions. 3.15.3.1. Annual update and inventory report or AUIR means the county report on public facilities described in section 3.15.6.2. 3.15.3.2. Application for development approval means an application submitted to Collier County requesting the approval of a development order. 3.15.3.3. Average annual daily traffic (AADT) shall be calculated consistent with the methodology established by the Florida Department of Transportation (I~'DOT). However the peak hour shall be established by using only 10 months of the year excluding February and March data. 3.15.3.4. Reserved. 3.15.3.5. Capital drainage facilities means the planning of, engineering for, acquisition of land for, or the construction of drainage and water management facilities necessary for proposed development to meet the LOS for drainage facilities. 3.15.3.6. Capital park facilities means the planning of, engineering for, acquisition of land for, or construction of buildings and park equipment necessary to meet the LOS for park facilities. 3.15.3.7. Capital road facilities or capital road improvement shall include transportation ~: .... :~ ~ and planning for, engineering for, right-of-way acquisition for, ,,,e ......... ~ .... construction of any project eligible for inclusion as a road project in the road component of the CE of the Collier County Growth Management Plan or the Five-Year Florida Department of Transportation Plan. 3.15.3.8 Capital potable water facilities mean the planning of, engineering for, acquisition of land for, or construction of potable water facilities necessary to meet the LOS for potable water facilities. 3.15.3.9. Capital sanitary sewer facilities mean the planning of, engineering for, acquisition of land for, or construction of sanitary sewer facilities necessary to meet the LOS for sanitary sewer facilities. 3.15.3.10. Capital solid waste facilities mean the planning of, engineering for, acquisition of land for, or construction of solid waste facilities necessary to meet the LOS for solid waste facilities. 3.15.3.11. Comprehensive plan means a plan that meets the requirements of F.S. §§ 163.3177 and 163.3178, and shall mean the Collier County Growth Management Plan, where referenced in this division. 3.15.3.-14-12. ~. Constrained facilities are roadways which have been designated by action of the Board of County Commissioners once it has been determined that the facility will not be expanded by two or more through lanes due to physical, environmental or policy constraints. Physical constraints occur when a roadway is developed to the maximum six lane standard or when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to roads, thus making expansion cost prohibitive. Environmental and policy constraints occur when decisions are made not to expand a road based on environmental, historical, archaeological, aesthetic or social impact considerations. Constrained roadways are identified by action of the BCC upon the recommendation of the Transportation Administrator. Roadways identified as constrained shall be subject to growth restrictions such that further LOS degradation does not occur once the roadway is determined to be operating below Level-of-Service standard. Constrained roadway segments are subject to growth restrictions that only allow for an increase in annual daily traffic volume of 10% above the service volume at Level-of-Service standard resulting in LOS operations not to exceed 110% of service volume. If the standard service volume is exceeded by 110%, only de minimis growth can be applied to the roadway segment. 3.15.3.12.1. Physical constraints occur when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to highways making roadway expansion cost prohibitive, or a facility has reached the maximum through lane standards acceptable to the county. 3.15.3.12.2. The maximum through lane standard shall be no greater than six through lanes with allowances for auxiliary_ or service lanes as deemed operationally necessary for county maintained facilities and as designated by the Florida Department of Transportation for state maintained facilities. 3.15.3.12.3. Policy constraints are artificial barriers to roadway expansions based on environmental or political realities within a community. Unlike physical constraints. however, these barriers to roadway expansion can change over time, as needs and community goals change. 3.15.3.13. Deficient road segment means a county or state road segment on the major road network system that is operating below its adopted level of service standard. 3.15.3.14. Roadway service volumes shall be determined based on the methodology contained in the most recent edition of the "Highway Capacity Manual", Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) procedures and applications, and the level of service standards set forth in the Capital Improvements and Transportation Elements of the Growth Management Plan. 3.15.3.14.1. In determining the capacity of a county road segment or a state road segment for the purpose of determining whether it is a deficient road segment, the county shall consider: Current roadway facilities including, but not limited to, number of lanes, provision of turn lanes and number of signals. 2. Capital road improvements under construction. Any improvements that are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement in which the improvements are completed or under construction before the impacts from the development or phased development accrue to the roadway system. Construction of the required capital improvement is included in or before the third year of either the state's five-year work program or the county's current five-year capital improvement schedule adopted as part of the Growth Management Plan. 3.15.3.4415. Developer means any person, including undertaking any development as defined in this division. a governmental agency, 3.15.3.4-516. Development agreement has the meaning contemplated in F.S. § 163.3220 et seq. 3.15.3.4-617. Development has the meaning given it in F.S. § 380.04. 3.15.3.-1-~18. Development order means any order, permit, determination, or action granting, denying, or granting with conditions as application for any final local development order, building permit, temporary use permit, temporary construction and development permit, sign permit, well permit, spot survey, electrical permit, plumbing permit, occupational license, boat dock permit, HVAC permit, septic tank permit, right- of-way permit, blasting permit, excavation permit, construction approval for infrastructure (including water, sewer, grading, paving), approved development of regional impact (DRI), zoning ordinance amendment, comprehensive plan amendment, flood variance, coastal construction control line variance, tree removal permits, site development plan approval, subdivision approval (including plats, plans, variances, and amendments), rezoning, PUD amendment, certification, conditional use (provisional use), variance, or any other official action of Collier County having the effect of permitting development as defined in this division. 3.15.3.-1-819. Final development order means a final local development order or a final DRI development order. 3.15.3.-1-920. Final DRI development order means a development order, as amended from time to time, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County and 161 approved by the state pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, notice of which is recorded pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(15)(f). 3.15.3.gO21. Final local development order means a final approved subdivision plat, a final appro--~ed site development plan, or building permit or mobile home tie-down permit issued by the county. 3.15.3.-2422. Growth management plan or GMP means the most recently adopted and effective comprehensive plan of Collier County, as amended from time to time. 3.15.3.g323. Land development regulations mean ordinances enacted by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 163.3161 et. set., for the regulation of development, and includes any zoning, subdivision, impact fee, building construction, or sign regulations, or any other regulations controlling the development of land. 3.15.3.-2-324. Level of service (LOS) means an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by, or proposed to be provided by a public facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the public facility, as adopted in the Collier County growth management plan. LOS shall indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility. 3.15.3.24.1. Level of service calculations for roads means calculations that are performed annually by_ comparing average annual daily traffic counts to the annual average daily traffic service volume. These service volumes are calculated to express the average daily traffic volumes based upon the ten-month average omitting February anct March. 3.15.3.25. Reserved. 3.15.3.g--526. LOS for capital drainage facilities varies among 1) new or existing capital drainage facilities owned or operated by a local government or other public entity, 2) existing capital drainage facilities owned or operated by private persons, and 3) new capital drainage facilities owned or operated by private persons. For those capital drainage facilities (publicly or privately owned) that are in existence on the effective date of this division and for those new capital drainage facilities owned or operated by a local government or other public entity, the LOS is the existing LOS as identified (by design storm return frequency event) in the Collier County Water Management Master Plan. For new capital drainage facilities owned or operated by private persons, the LOS is identified in the drainage sub-element and capital improvement element policy 1.1 .$6.A.3 (present requirements are a 25-year, three-day storm event) and is based on those standards and requirements for renewal and approval of drainage and stormwater management plans established in the Collier County Water Management Policy Ordinance No. 74-50, as amended and Ordinance No. 90-10 which are incorporated herein by reference. 3.15.3.2-627. LOS for capital park facilities means 2.9412 acres per 1,000 persons for regional park land; 1.2882 acres per/i,000 persons for community park land; and $179.00 $240 of capital investment per capita (at current cost) for recreational facilities. 3.15.3.2428. LOS for capital potable water facilities varies between public water systems and private water systems. For the county water and sewer district the LOS is 185 gallons per capita per day (GPCD). For the Goodland water district the LOS is 163 GPCD. For the city of Naples unincorporated service area the LOS is 163 GPCD. For the Everglades City unincorporated service area the LOS is 163 GPCD. For private potable water systems; the LOS is the sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.31 of the Potable Water Sub-Element of the Growth Management Plan~o~o ,,,-,,c~" ..... - o, except that approved private wells are exempt from these LOS requirements.'-._ ~1~ A l:~T 1:2 T~T~. club .......... v .... nt 25 .............. * (p t) ...... ~ ............... space. 50 ............. k~ ........ ) 5 1 Sh ......... , ...... ;,h.-..,, ,e,-.A.-1 A. 1 ....A..,, t..~. square ............ r,-~w ,-. it "P~ ) (b) s ............. ,,~, ....... space .... Churches r ...... *~ 3 k~a~ ~'~/ (p ......\ ,n bli Pu c ........................................ r ..... \v,~* v ...... ., Schocl~ (per ( )si Two ............... , .... .~ 3.15.3. ,,~,29. LOS for capital road facilities on the major road network system are as set forth in Policy 1.1.5 of the Capital Improvement Element and Policy 1.4 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. ' 16! 3.15.3.-2-930. The LOS for capital sanitary sewer facilities varies between public sanitary sewer systems and private sanitary sewer systems. The LOS for ~'"'~; ~ .... l ..... * ~.1.;.~ *~ I ~C I QI gpcd ~the North Sewer Area is 145 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The LOS for the South Sewer Area is 100 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The LOS for the City of Naples Uninco~orated Service Area is 121 gallons per day per capita (gpcd). The LOS for private sanitary sewer systems is as required by the State of Florida in Chapter 10-D-6, F.A.C. These standards vary according to the type of land use. :r-heg-a~ ............... v .... aApproved private septic systems are exempt from {-hose LOS requirements+= q-ar~t ~ D?SET: 10 161 (0 Carry cut ~nly: (C) ................................................ j .......... k~ ............. , .... ............................. p~k ) lyr ......... ~ 5 1 11 161 3.15.3..~,,31. LOS for capital solid waste disposal facilities '~,.,';'~ .... -~+ .... -~ , ......... ~ '~:" ..... ~"~ ..... : .... + ...... + ~;" ......~:~ (2) years oz-~ ........... j ..................... ~ ~"V .... j -~ tWO constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years, and ten (10) ye~s of per~ttable landfill capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) ye~s. 12 161 3 1~5 3 ~32 t~e *ct~' "-: ....... '~ ~":~' ~ .... -. The major road network system is depicted in the traffic circulatien Transpo~ation element of the Collier County Growth M~agement Plan. 3.15.3.33. The Peak season, peak hour is based on the average of 10 months of the year (omitting February/March) and is the basic time reference used to calculate levels of service using the definitions and methodologies of the current edition of the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual and the procedures and applications from the Florida Department of Transportation. 3.15.3.354. Person means an individual, corporation, governmental agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, two or more persons having a joint or common interest, or any other entity, and its designated agents, successors or assigns. 13 161 ! as 3.15.3.3-335. Public facilities mean capital drainage facilities, capital park facilities, capital potable water facilities, capital road facilities, capital sanitary sewer facilities, and capital solid waste facilities. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 96-66, § 3.J.; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.1.) Sec. 3.15.4. Rules of construction. In the construction of this division, the rules set out in this section shall be observed unless such construction is inconsistent with the manifest intent of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. The rules of construction and definitions set forth herein shall not be applied to any provisions which expressly exclude such construction, or where the subject matter, content or context of such provisions would make such construction internally inconsistent or inconsistent with other provisions of this division. 3.15.4.1. Generally. All provisions, terms, phrases and expressions contained in this division shall be liberally construed in order that the true intent and meaning of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners may be fully carried out. Terms used in this division, unless otherwise specifically provided, shall have the meanings prescribed by the statutes of this state for the same terms. In the interpretation and application of any provision of this division it shall be held to be the minimum requirement adopted for the promotion of the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare. Where any provision of this division imposes greater restrictions upon the subject matter than a general provision imposed by the growth management plan or another provision of this division, the provision imposing the greater restriction or regulation shall be deemed to be controlling. 3.15.4.2. Text. In case of any difference of meaning or implication between the text of this division and any figure, the text shall control. 14 3.15.4.3. Computation of time. The time within which an act is to be done shall be computed by excluding the first and including the last day; if the last day is Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, that day shall be excluded. 3.15.4.4. Day. The word "day" shall mean a calendar day, unless "business" day is indicated. 3.15.4.5. Delegation of authority. Whenever a provision appears requiring a division administrator, the head of a department or some other county officer or employee to do some act or perform some duty, it is to be construed to authorize the division administrator, head of the department or some other county officer or employee to designate, delegate and authorize professional level subordinates to perform the required act or duty unless the terms of the provision or section specify otherwise. 3.15.4.6. Gender. Words importing the masculine gender shall be construed to include the feminine and neuter. 3.15.4.7. Month. The word "month" shall mean a calendar month. 3.15.4.8. Non-technical and technical words. Words and phrases shall be construed according to the common and approved usage of the language, but technical words and phrases and such others as may have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law shall be construed and understood according to such meaning. 3.15.4.9. Number. A word importing the singular number only, may extend and be applied to several persons and things as well as to one person and thing. The use of the plural number shall be deemed to include any single person or thing. 3.15.4.10. Shall, may. The word "shall" is mandatory; "may" is permissive. 3.15.4.11. Tense. Words used in the past or present tense include the future as well as the past or present. 3.15.4.12. Week. The word "week" shall mean seven calendar days. 3.15.4.13. Written or in writing. The term "written" or "in writing" shall be construed to include any representation of words, letters, or figures whether by printing or other form or method of writing. 3.15.4.14. Year. The word "year" shall mean a calendar year, unless a fiscal year is indicated or 365 days is indicated. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 96-66, § 3.J.; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.1.) 15 Sec. 3.15.5. Establishment of management and monitoring program and regulatory program: the annual update and inventory report (AUIR), Transportation Concurrency Management System, CIE amendments, and annual budget. In order to implement the mandate of the Collier County Growth Management Plan to ensure that adequate potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, park and road public facilities are available to accommodate development in Collier County concurrent with when the impacts of development occur on such public facilities, the Board of County Commissioners establishes, pursuant to the terms of this division, (1) a management and monitoring program that evaluates the conditions of public facilities to ensure they are being adequately planned for and funded to maintain the LOS for each public facility herein after referred to as the AUIR, and (2) a regulatory program that ensures that each public facility is available to serve development orders which are subject to the provisions of this division. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.1.) Sec. 3.15.6. Management and monitoring program. 3.15.6.1. General. In order to ensure that adequate potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, park and road public facilities are available concurrent with when the impacts of development occur on such public facilities, the county shall establish the following management and monitoring practices. Their purpose is to evaluate and coordinate the timing, provision, and funding of potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, park and road public facilities (1) to ensure adequate planning and funding to maintain the LOS for the public facilities, and (2) to evaluate the capacity of the public facilities for use in the regulatory program to ensure that no development orders subject to concurrency regulation are issued unless adequate public facilities are available to serve the development concurrent with when the impacts of that development occur. 3.15.6.2. Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR). On or about December 1 of each year, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator shall complete an annual update and inventory report on public facilities (hereinafter "AUIR"). The AUIR shall determine the existing conditions of all capital potable water, capital sanitary sewer, capital solid waste, capital drainage, capital park, and capital road public facilities to determine and summarize the available capacity of these capital improvements (public facilities) based on their LOS, forecast the capacity of existing and planned public facilities identified in the five-year capital improvement schedule for each of the five succeeding years, and ten succeeding years, and identify new projects needed to maintain adopted LOS. The forecasts shall be based on the most recently updated schedule of capital improvements (public facilities) for each public facility. The AUIR shall be based on the most recent bureau of economic and business research (BEBR) population projections, updated public facility inventories, updated unit costs and revenue projections, and analysis of the most recent traffic county data_. 16 The findings of the AUIR, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners, shall be the basis for the preparation of the next annual update and amendment of the CIE and the annual determination of deficient, or constrained "Category A" facilities. The AUIR shall identify additional projects and funding for inclusion in the Schedule of Capital Improvements and the Costs and Revenues Schedule of the CIE needed to maintain or restore adopted LOS for all "Category A" facilities for the next five years. Direction by the Board of County Commissioners to update and amend the CIE to include projects and revenues needed to maintain adopted LOS for "Category A" facilities, as identified in the AUIR, shall constitute a finding of concurrent "Category A" facilities, for the review and issuance of development orders subject to the provisions of this division until the presentation of the next AUIR. In addition to identifying needed capacity expansion projects and revenues for inclusion in the CIE, the roads component of the AUIR will include an audit and update of the capacity balances in the Transportation Concurrency Management System database factoring in development approvals since the previous AUIR and capacity expansion projects included in the financially feasible Schedule of Capital Improvements of the CIE. 3.15.6.2.1. Annual determination of adequate "Category A" public facilities (concurrency) On ~ ~"~ ~ .... ,.~ ~ ~c ~ ..... t~.~ r- ...... :.., r~ .... , .....· ~ ~..; ......~, e~-.;~o r~;.,;~;~ ^,4~;~:~,~,~ The County Manager will annually present the AUIR report to the Board of County Commissioners identifying deficiencies pv or potential deficiencies in "Category A" public facilities and remedial action options including but not limited to the following: Establishment of areas of significant influence (ASI's)i Public facility project additions to the financially feasible CIE; r~c~,~ ~ ~ .... , ....., ~.~.; ........ Establish interim development controls in affected service areas pending: Lowering of LOS via growth management plan amendment; Inclusion of necessary public facility projects in the next adopted annual budget and next annual CIE update and amendment; Approval of new or increased revenue sources for needed public facility projects by the Board of County Commissioners, the state legislature or the county voters. Private development improvements guaranteed by an enforceable development agreement. Designation of a constrained roadway segment. 3.15.6.3 Recommendations on the annual CIE update and annual budget. Based upon the AUIR analysis, the. Administrat,~r the County Manager or designee shall propose to the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners ^- ~- .... I 17 eaeh-ye~, the annual update and amendment to the CIE as part of the annual growth management plan amendment cycle transmittal public hearings. It will include the public facilities needed to maintain LOS as directed by the Board of County Commissioners upon presentation of the AUIR. The annual budget, which is to be adopted by October 1 of each year shall also include projects and funding as directed by the board upon presentation of the prior AUIR. 3.15.6.4. Establishment of Deficient, or Constrained segments. 3.15.6.4.1 Establishment of deficient roadway segments. - .... c o;~.,,;~., ;.n ...... ~-* ..... ;**~' .....~"+ ~*~' I ~.a ,~ .... ; .... a ......~ '~;~"~ ..... ;' .... ;~ that ~' ..... ~ '" ..... :~:~ '~: ...... ;"'~ Deficient roadway segments may be defined as constrained with provisions for li~ted additional impact as defined in section 3.15.3.12. For deficient roadway segments that cannot be defined as constrained, no trips shall be allotted under a certificate of public facility adequacy for development that generates more than a de ~ni~s impact to a deficient segment as deter~ned after consideration of the development's traffic impact analysis. 3.15.6.4.1.1 Significant impact for traffic impact analysis for a proposed development shall be defined as the following: On links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is up to and including 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is 5% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. 3.15.6.4.2. Establishment of area(s) of significant influence (ASI). If the finding of the AUIR analysis identify additional road improvement projects needed to maintain adopted LOS, they may be included in the road component of the proposed annual CIE update and amendment at the discretion of the board. Based upon board direction on inclusion of additional road projects, the community development and environmental services 18 division administrator, in conjunction with the Transportation Services Administrator may propose and identify one or more areas of significant influence (AS1) for any deficient road segment. The limits of any ASI shall be established pursuant to the standards in subsection 3.15.6.4.3 of this division. No trips greater than 1% of the adopted peak hour service volume shall be allotted to any single development in an ASI encompassing a deficient road segment. o A o 19 3.15.6.4.g3. Standards in establishing area of significant influence (ASI). 3.15.6.4.g3.1. General. The boundaries for an An ASI shall include the directly impacted roadway segments that are deficient. ~-~ ~'~ .......... ,,~ .... ~,, ~h., - segments. 3.15.6.4.3.2. Interim development controls on ASI links. The directly impacted deficient link shall be limited to de minimis development, which allows an impact of less 20 161 1 than 1% of the peak hour service volume. The immediately adjacent links to the directly impacted roadway segment shall be continuously reviewed to insure that no development is approved on those links that would allow more than de minimis development to occur on the directly impacted link. Development of a single-family home on a lot, tract ot parcel of land is exempt from the provisions of this section. 3.15.6.4.g4. Review and approval by board of county commissioners. After receipt of the propo boundaries of a potential ASI proposed Transpo~ation Se~ices Division Ad~nistrator~ the ~oard of County ~o~ssioners, Janu~y I cf each ye~, shall hold a public hemng noticed pursuant to the requirements of F.S. ~ 125.66(5):, and aAfter consideration of the proposal and public comment, the Bo~d may approve the ~ designation of an ASI, (including a map of the ~ impacted roadway segments ....................... ~ eT with or without modifications, or deter~ne that competent substantial evidence has ,~,:~,.~ deficient and been placed on the record to show that the road segment is not v deter~ne that the establishment of an ASI is not necess~y to ensure that development orders are served by adequate road public facilities. The approved ...... ~ ~:~..~ ..... :.-, *~:~ ~- ..... *~ fo. .... ~h ~ eT will become effective upon adoption by the Bo~d of CounW Comssioners. on ...... j 3.15.6.4.4~. Map of areas of significant influence (ASI). A map showing the ~ affected roadway segments within_each ASI established by the Board of County Co~ssioners shall be kept in the Co--unity Development and Environmental Services Division and the office of the Clerk to the Board of ...... ;*-. County Comssioners for review an~ inspection by the public during norm~ business hours. 3.15.6.4.56. Duration of established ~ea of signific~t influence (ASI). Once the bound~ies of an ASI are approved by the bo~d of county comssioners, they are valid for one ye~, unless otherwise dissolved. ,,,~ ~ approve ................. j cc ....... s,c .... s, ,--~7 ~e ........ ye~. 3.15.6.4.V. Dissolution of ~ea of significant influence (ASI). for,~.~ ~-~:**~ ~- ...... ~.o.~-*~'~*;~- o~,. ~ the Schedule of Capital ~provements is amended to include the needed road improvements to eli~nate the classification of a ~,~,o,,., ~v:~:~. road segment, then the area of significant road as a deficient or v ..........~ ~,~,.,.~ ~n~;~ road segment shall influence (ASI) established for that deficient or v ..........J be dissolved in the same manner in which it was established. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 96-66, § 3.J.; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.I.) 21 1 Sec. 3.15,?. Regulatory program: review of development to ensure ~adequate public facilities are available. 3.15.7.1. General. In order to ensure that adequate potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, park and road public facilities are available concurrent with when the impacts of development occur on each public facility, Collier County shall establish the following development review procedures to ensure that no development orders subject to concurrency regulation are issued unless adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed development. 3.15.7.2. Exemptions. The following development orders and development shall be exempt from the terms of this division: 3.15.7.2.1. All valid, unexpired final development of regional impact (DRI) development orders which were issued prior to adoption of the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989, except where: 3.15.7.2.1.1. Development conditions or stipulations applicable to concurrency, or the provision of adequate public facilities concurrent with the impacts of development, exist in the DRI development order; 3.15.7.2.1.2. Substantial deviations are sought for a DRI development order and then this division shall apply only to those portions of the development for which the deviation is sought; 3.15.7.2.1.43. The county can demonstrate pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the development order have occurred or the development order was based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the developer or that the application of this division to the development order is clearly established to be essential to the public health, safety and welfare; or 3.15.7.2.1.54_. The new requirements would not so change or alter a DRI development order that they would materially or substantially affect the developer's ability to complete the development authorized by the DRI development order. 3.15.7.2.2. Construction of public facilities that are consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 3.15.7.2.43. Original T_temporary construction and development permits and any subsequent renewals not to exceed a cumulative period of one year. 22 161 ii 3.15.7.2.54. Development orders permitting replacement, reconstruction or repair of existing de-velopment consistent with all elements of the growth management plan. 3.15.7.2.65. Original T_temporary use permits and any subsequent renewals not to exceed a cumulative period of one year. 3.15.7.2.:36._ Any development order or development whose current owner is entitled to receive, and who properly obtains, a determination of vested rights for adequate public facilities ("APF") in accordance with the provisions of this section. 3.15.7.2.7. 3.15.7.2.:36.1. Application. An application for determination of vested rights for APF shall be submitted in the form established by the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator. An application fee in an amount to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners shall accompany and be part of the application. The application shall, at a minimum, include: 3.15.7.2.:36.1.1. Name, address, and telephone number of the owner and authorized applicant if other than the owner; 3.15.7.2.:36.1.2. Street address, legal description, and acreage of the property; and 3.15.7.2.745.1.3. All factual information and knowledge reasonably available to the owner and applicant to address the criteria established in section 3.15.7.2.:36.7. 3.15.7.2.745.2. Determination of completeness. After receipt of an application for determina~on of vested rights for APF, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator shall determine whether the application submitted is complete. If he determines that the application is not complete, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator shall notify the applicant in writing of the deficiencies. The Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator shall take no further steps to process the application until the deficiencies have been remedied. 3.15.7.2.:36.3. Review and determination or recommendation by community development and environmental services division administrator and the county attorney. After receipt of a completed application for determination of vested rights for APF, the community development and environmental services division administrator and the county attorney shall review and evaluate the application in light of all of the criteria in section 3.15.7.2.:36.7. Based on the review and evaluation, the community development and environmental-services division administrator and the county attorney shall prepare a written recommendation to the hearing officer that the application should be denied, granted or granted with conditions by the hearing officer. Such recommendation shall include findings of fact for each of the criteria established in section 3.15.7.2.:36.7. to the extent that information is represented or obtained or inclusion feasible or applicable. If the community development and environmental services division administrator and the county attorney agree based on the review and evaluation that the application for 23 161 determination of vested rights for APF so clearly should be granted or granted with conditions, then they may enter into a written stipulated determination of vested rights for APF with the owner, in lieu of the written recommendation to the hearing officer and the provisions in sections 3.15.7.2.g6.4., 3.15.7.2.;t6.5. and 3.15.7.2.:16.6. However, any such stipulated determination shall be in writing, signed by the community development and environmental services division administrator, the county attorney and the owner, and shall include findings of fact based on the criteria established in section 3.15.7.2.;t6.7., conclusions of law for such criteria, and the determination granting or granting with conditions, in whole or in part, the vested rights for adequate public facilities. 3.15.7.2.:;t6.4. Review and determination of vested rights determination for APF by hearing officer. Upon receipt by the hearing officer of the application for determination of vested rights for APF and the written recommendation of the community development and environmental services division administrator and the county attorney, the hearing officer shall hold a public hearing on the application. At the hearing, the hearing officer shall take evidence and sworn testimony in regard to the criteria set forth in $section 3.15.7.2.6.7.,7.2.7.7., and shall follow the rules of procedure set forth in g~4on F.S. § 120.57(1)(b), 4, 6, 7, and 8~;~r:'~;'~,~,~,~ ~-~,~.~.-o,e~"~ .... ,~.~,~'~ ~,....~...~"*~"'~ F.S. § 120.58(1)(a),(d) and (f)~; ~ and geetion F.S. § 120.58(1)(b),~r:~:-~,~,~,~ ~,~,~,~,,o,C*~"'*~° only to the extent that the hearing officer is empowered to swear witnesses and take testimony under oath. The hearing officer shall follow the procedures established for administrative hearings in Rules 60Q-2.009, 2.017, 2.020, 2.022, 2.023, 2.024, 2.025, 2.027, and 2.031, F.A.C. Fl,orida Administrative, Cc, de, except as expressly set forth herein. The parties before the hearing officer shall include the county, the owner or applicant, and the public. Testimony shall be limited to the matters directly relating to the standards set forth in section 3.15.7.2.6.7.7.2.7.7. The county attorney shall represent the county, shall attend the public hearing, and shall offer such evidence as is relevant to the proceedings. The owner of the property and its authorized agents, may offer such evidence at the public hearing as is relevant to the proceedings and criteria. The order of presentation before the hearing officer at the public hearing shall be as follows: 1) the county's summary of the application, written recommendation, witnesses and other evidence; 2) owner or applicant witnesses and evidence; 3) public witnesses and evidence; 4) county rebuttal, if any; and 5) applicant rebuttal, if any. 3.15.7.2.;t6.5. Issuance of vested rights determination for APF by hearing officer. Within 15 working days after the completion of the public hearing under section 3.15.7.2.6.4.7.2.7.4., the Hearing officer shall consider the application for determination of vested rights for APF, the recommendation of the community development and environmental services division administrator and the county attorney, and the evidence and testimony presented at the public hearing, in light of all of the criteria set forth in section 3.15.7.2.6.7.7.2.7.7., and shall deny, grant, or grant with conditions the application for determination of vested rights for APF for the property or properties at issue. The determination shall be in writing and shall include findings of fact for each of the applicable criteria established in section 3.15.7.2.6.7.7.2.7.7., conclusions of law for 24 each of such criteria, and a determination denying, granting, or granting with conditions, in whole or in part, the vested rights for adequate public facilities. 3.15.7.2.~6.6. Appeal to the Board of County Commissioners. Within 30 days after issuance of the Hearing Officer's written determination of vested rights for APF, the County Attorney, the Cormnunity Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator, or the owner or its authorized attorney or agent, may appeal the determination of vested rights for APF of the Hearing Officer to the Board of County Commissioners. A fee for the application and processing of an owner-initiated appeal shall be established at a rate set by the Board of County Commissioners from time to time and shall be charged to and paid by the owner or its authorized agent. The Board of County Commissioners shall adopt the Hearing Officer's determination of vested rights for APF, with or without modifications or conditions, or reject the Hearing Officer's determination of vested rights for APF. The Board of County Commissioners shall not be authorized to modify or reject the Hearing Officer's determination of vested rights for APF unless the Board of County Commissioners finds that the Hearing Officer's determination is not supported by substantial competent evidence in the record of the Hearing Officer's public hearing or that the Hearing Officer's determination of vested rights for APF is contrary to the criteria established in Ss_ection 3.15.7.2.6.7.7.2.7.7. 3.15.7.2.~6.7. Criteria for vested rights. This section is intended to strictly adhere to and implement existing case law as they relate to the doctrine of vested rights and equitable estoppel as applied to a local government exercising its authority and powers in zoning, the provision of adequate public facilities concurrent with development (concurrency), and related matters. It is the express intent of Collier County to require application of the provisions of this division to as much development and property in the unincorporated areas of the county as is legally possible without violating the legally vested rights which the owner may have obtained in accordance with Florida common law and statutory law, particularly F.S. § 163.3167(8). The criteria herein provided shall be considered in rendering a vested rights determination under this section. It is intended that each case be decided on a case by case factual analysis. An owner shall be entitled to a positive determination of vested rights for APF only if he demonstrates by substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to complete his development without regard to the otherwise applicable provisions of this division based on the provisions of F.S. § 163.3167(8), or all three of the following requirements of the three-part test under Florida common law: 1) upon some act or omission of the county, 2) a property owner relying in good faith, 3) has made such a substantial change in position or has incurred such extensive obligations and expenses that it would by highly inequitable and unjust to destroy the rights acquired. 3.15.7.2.;t6.8. Limitation on determination of vested rights for APF. A determination of vested rights for APF which grants an application for determination of vested rights for APF shall expire and be null and void unless construction is commenced pursuant to a final development order, final subdivision plat, or final site development plan, within two years after the issuance of the determination of vested rights for APF under tb~,s section 3.15.7.2.:¢6., or unless substantial permanent buildings have been, or are being constructe-~] or installed pursuant to a valid, unexpired, final development order of Collier 25 161 1 County within two years after issuance of the determination of vested rights for APF under this section 3.15.7.2.:36, and such development pursuant to a final development order, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, final subdivision master plan, or planned unit development master plan is continuing in good faith. The aforementioned two-year time limitation on the determination of vested rights for APF shall be stayed during any time periods within which commencement of construction pursuant to a final development order, final subdivision plat, or final site development plan is prohibited or deferred by the county solely as a result of lack of adequate public facilities to serve the property, pursuant to this division. 3.15.7.2.6.9. Certification of transportation impact vesting in conjunction with a development agreement. Within six months of the effective date of this ordinance, previously approved Planned Unit Developments (PUD) and subdivision plats, without statutory vesting, may apply for certification of vesting for transportation impacts. The form and content of the application will be determined by the Transportation Services Division Administrator. Revisions to the PUD or plat that do not increase impacts may be allowed without losing vesting or being required to go through the initial application process under a development agreement under the provisions of Chapter 163.3220 F. S. During the process of determining the status of vesting, revisions to planned unit developments and subdivision plats that decrease the impact of the development through such methods as reducing density, making additional provisions for mixed use development to capture trips or providing additional transportation system interconnections may be modified to maintain or attain traffic impact vesting. These types of changes shall be evaluated and upon concurrence of the Transportation Services Division Administrator presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval in the form of a development agreement as provided for in Chapter 163.3220 F.S. 3.15.7.3. Certificate of public facility adequacy. 3.15.7.3.1. General. 3.15.7.3.1.1. A ,,~n,~,,,_~, ...... -,-,,~,-v-:~'~,~-, certificate of public facility adequacy shall be obtained concu~ently with m the approval of the v:n_~ v~ _ ~ ..... ~ ~ e~liest or next to occur of final residential final subdivision plat, final site development plan or building per~t ~ ......................... vv .................. J--e .......... At the time a Ceffificate of Public Facility Adequacy is issued, all applicable impact fees must be paid into the applicable Trust Fund and will be i~ediately available to implement "Category A" apit l~-~i p i 1 dig d c a .... m rovements, nc u n roa s. 26 161 1 3.15.7.3.1.2. Reserved. 3.15.7.3.1.3. Where the proposed development has been issued final subdivision plat approval or final site development plan approval prior to the effective date of this division, a certificate of public facility adequacy shall be obtained prior to approval of the next development order required for the proposed development. 3.15.7.3.1.4. Estimated applicable impact fees for a development shall be paid into the Applicable Impact Fee Escrow Trust Funds in the amount estimated to be due as a prerequisite to the issuance of the a final plat, final site plan or building permit(s) for the development upon or prior to issuance of a certificate of public facility adequacy for the d 1 p _pt :" ....... * ~ *~-~ ~*; .... ,~ impact fees into the Impact Fee Escrow Trust Fund prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall be applied as a credit towards the impact fees calculated and due as a prerequisite to the issuance of the building permit(s) for the development. Impact fees paid into the Impact Fee Escrow Trust Fund prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall be refundable upon written request to the community development and environmental services division administrator accompanied by the surrender of the original certificate of public facility adequacy obtained prior to issuance of building permit(s) for the development. Fees paid as a prerequisite to the issuance of building permit(s) in accordance with the applicable consolidated impact fee ordinances shall be refundable pursuant to the provisions of such ordinances upon written request to the finance director, clerk of courts. 3.15.7.3.2. Rules of general applicability for certificate of public facility adequacy. 3.15.7.3.2.1. Timing. An application for a certificate of public facility adequacy may only be submitted at--amjq4m~, subject to section 3.15.7.3.1.1. 3.15.7.3.2.2. Impact Fees. A complete application for a certificate of public facility adequacy will include the tender of the total amount of impact fees estimated to be due, as determined by the Impact Fee Coordinator, on the development for which a development order application has been submitted. Impact fees will be deposited into the applicable Impact Fee Trust Fund and will be immediately available for appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners for capital improvements. Final calculation of impact fees due will based on the impact fee schedule in effect at the time of the issuance of building permit(s). Additional impact fees may be due prior to issuance of the building permit(s), or a refund from the Impact Fee Trust Fund (accompanied by the surrender of the Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities) may be due to the applicant in the case of an overpayment at application for a development order. 27 3.15.7.3.2.g3. Consolidated application. A building permit, final subdivision plat or final site development plan shall receive final approval only to the extent to which the proposed development receives a certificate of public facility adequacy. The application for a certificate of public facility adequacy may only be submitted with an application for development approval, where appropriate under this division. An application for a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy will receive final approval and a certificate will be issued concurrently with a final site development plan, final subdivision plat or building permit. 3.15.7.3.2.S.4_ Assignability and transferability. A certificate of public facility adequacy shall mn with the land, shall be assignable within a proposed development, and shall not be assignable or transferable to other development. 3.15.7.3.2.&5_ Expiration. A certificate of public facility adequacy shall expire three years from the date of its approval except to the extent that building permits have been issued for the proposed development for which the certificate is approved or a final residential subdivision plat has been approved and recorded, and the proposed development is then completed pursuant to the terms of the Collier County Building Code:,---pr-reticle: Refund of Impact Fees will be subject to the provisions of the Consolidated Impact Fee Trust Fund Ordinance. 3.15.7.3.2.45.1. For large developments as indicated below, a five year Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy may be obtained provided the Developer enters into an enforceable development agreement with the County. For development comprised of more than 500 residential dwelling units, or for a phased increment of development comprised of more than 150 residential dwelling units, or for a commercial/industrial development of more than 100,000 square feet of gross leasable area, a certificate of public facility adequacy shall expire five years from the date of its approval except to the extent that building permits have been issued for the proposed development for which the certificate is approved, and the proposed development is then completed pursuant to the ty B ..... ;,~,4 ,~.~ ~:~: ....~,~. terms of the Collier Coun uilding Code:, v .............................. 28 161 1 3.15.7.3.2.56_. Effect. Issuance of a certificate of public facility adequacy shall demonstrate proof of adequate public facilities to serve the development approved in the development order, subject to the conditions in the development order. A subsequent application for development approval for development approved in a development order for which a certificate of public facility adequacy has been approved shall be determined to have adequate public facilities as long as the certificate of public facility adequacy is valid and unexpired. When a certificate of public facility adequacy expires, any subsequent application for development approval shall require a new certificate of public facility adequacy to be issued pursuant to the terms of this section prior to approval of any subsequent development order for the proposed development. Application for approval of a certificate of public facility adequacy for subsequent or continuing development once a certificate has expired shall be based on public facility availability at the time of the new application. Under no circumstances shall a certificate of public facility adequacy be automatically renewed. 3.15.7.3.3. Effect of development agreement in conjunction with a certificate of public facility adequacy. Upon approval by the board of county commissioners, any applicant may enter into a development agreement with Collier County pursuant to the provisions of F.S. §§ 163.3220--3242, in conjunction with the approval of a development order and/or a certificate of public facility adequacy. The effect of the development agreement shall be to bind the parties pursuant to the terms and conditions of the development agreement and the certificate of public facility adequacy in order to insure that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed development concurrent with when the impacts of the development occur on the public facilities. 3.15.7.3.4. Procedure for review of application. 3.15.7.3.4.1. Submission of applications and fees. TheAn Application for a Certificate ~c,.,,.. ~11 ........+ ...... *'^~'~° shall be submitted in of Public Facility Adequacy .......... v ............ .e ....... duplicate to the Community Development and Environmental Services Division n rator ...... ~,e ............ a .......................... s .... ..~-.--_, ........ 29 161 1 shall be submitted at the filing of the earliest or next to occur of final residential final subdivision plat, final site development plan, or building permit as specifically provided for under subsection 3.15.7.3. I. 1. An application fees in an amount to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners shall accompany and be part of the applications. 3.15.7.3.4.2. Application contents. The form and contents for the Application for Public Facility Adequacy except for the road component shall be established by the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator. In all cases, the applicant shall provide a facsimile number at which communications and notifications from the County to the applicant may be sent. The form and contents for the Application for Public Facility Adequacy for the roadway component shall be established by the Transportation Services Division Administrator. Although the application will have two major components (transportation and all other "Category A" facilities), complete applications in their entirety are necessary to allow proper and adequate review by both the Community Development and Environmental Services Division and the Transportation Services Division. The form and contents for the entire Application shall be published and made available to the general public. 3.15.7.3.4.3. Determination of completeness and review. Upon receipt of an Application for Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy by the Community Development and Environmental Services Division, all copies of the application will be time and date stamped. One copy will be forwarded to the Transportation Services Division for processing no later than the next business day. After receipt of the a~ Application for Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator and Transportation Services Division Administrator shall determine whether its respective component is complete within five business days. If it is determined that th~ · ,er ..............any component of the application is not complete, written notice via facsimile shall be ser-vea~m provided to the applicant specifying the deficiencies. The Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator and Transportation Services Division Administrator shall take no further action on the application unless the deficiencies are remedied. The applicant shall provide the additional information within 60 days or the application will be considered withdrawn and the application fee is forfeited. Within twenty business days after the application is determined to be complete, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator shall review and grant, or deny each public facility component except for roads in the application pursuant to the standards established in g_section 3.15.7.3.5. The Transportation Services Administrator shall review and grant, or deny a certificate of adequate public facility for roads within twenty business days after the application is determined to be complete. 3.15.7.3.4.4. Appeal to_of Public Facilities Determination._, ^~vv,~,~ r,^~;+,~,.~,_,__,,~,~,~. Within 30 days after issuance of the deter~nation of the Co--unity Development and Environmental Services Division Ad~nistrator ancot the Tr~sponation Services Division Ad~nistrator on the Application for a Ce~ificate of Public Facility Adequacy, the applicant may appeal the deter~nation of ~ ~ ...... :+-' ~ .... ~ ..... · ~-~ 30 Collier County Bo~d of County Co~ssioners. A fee for the application and processing on an appeal sh~l be established at a rate set by the Board of County Co~ssioners from time to time and shall be ch~ged to and paid by the applicant for a third p~y evaluation. The third p~y sh~l be ~ outside consultant who has been previously approved by the county for the pu~ose of providing independent review and reco~endations on public facility adequacy deter~nations. The Bo~d of County Co~ssioners o,,~,;~ ~.;,;,~. ~,~-~;~,;~ ~ .... ~ .................................. ~ .............. shall hold a hearing on the appeal and shall consider the deter~nation of the Co--unity Development and Environmental Services Division Ad~nistrator and the Transportation Services Division Ad~nistrator, independent third p~y testimony and public testimony in light of all the criteria set fo~h in ~ection 3.15.7.3.5 of tSi~ ordinance. The Bo~d of County Co~ssioners ~"~;~ =~;~;';~' ~ ..... ;~';~ * .... ~ ~; .... shall adopt the Co--unity Developmem and Environmental Services Division Ad~nis~ator's and the Transpo~ation Se~ices Division Ad~nistrator's deter~nation on the Application for a Ce~ificate of Public Facility Adequacy with or without modifications or conditions, or reject the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Ad~nistrator's and the Transpo~ation Services Division Administrator's deter~nation. The Board of CounW Co~ssioners ~"~ ~;~;';~' ~*~'~;~';~ shall not be authorized to modify or reject the Co--unity Development and Environmental Se~ices Division Ad~nistrator's and the Transpo~ation Services Division Ad~nistrator's determination unless the Bo~d of County Co~ssioners ........ ~ ............ finds that the deter~nation is not supposed by substantial competent evidence or that the Co--unity Development and Environmental Services Division Ad~nistrator's and the Transpo~atJon Services Division Ad~nistrator's deter~nation is contr~y to the criteria established in ~ection 3.15.7.3.5 ~ m;~ ~.~; ..... The decision of the Board of County Co~ssioners Fa~u;*;~ m~*~-~;-~*;~- * .... ~ ~;**~ shall include findings of fact for each of the criteria. 3.15.7.3.4.5. Cancellation of certificates. Upon notification by the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator or his designee and the Transportation Services Division Administrator or his designee, that an application for a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy has been approved and a Certificate issued, the applicant shall have ~ 5 business days to pick up the Certificate and pay all applicable impact ""'~ ....... '~ .... ' ..... * fe T~ +1-, .... 1;~- ~e~:lo +~ .-d~l .... ~-1~ thc ~':~* ~' .... ,-+:e:=n ~:, If the applicant does not pick up the Certificate and pay 31 all applicable impact fees within ~ 5 business days of notification by facsimile by,,,,,~"*~'~-~,,,~ ~---,~:' the Certificate will be voided. In such a case, the applicant shall then be required to apply for issuance of a new Certificate. 3.15.7.3.5. Standards for review of application. The following standards shall be used in the determination of whether to grant or deny a certificate of public facility adequacy. Before issuance of a certificate of public facility adequacy, the application shall fulfill the standards for each public facility component (potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, parks and roads). 3.15.7.3.5.1. Potable water facilities. 3.15.7.3.5.1.1. The potable water component shall be granted if any of the following conditions are met: 3.15.7.3.5.1.1.1. The required public facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.1.1.2. The required public facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.1.1.3. The required public facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of subsections 3.15.7.3.5.1.1.1. and 3.15.7.3.5.1.1.2. 3.15.7.3.5.2. Sanitary sewer facilities. 3.15.7.3.5.2.1. The sanitary sewer component shall be granted if any of the following conditions are met: 3.15.7.3.5.2.1.1. The required public facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.2.1.2. The required public facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.2.1.3. The required public facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of subsections 3.15.7.3.5.2.1.1. and 3.15.7.3.5.2.1.2. 3.15.7.3.5.3. Solid waste facilities. 3.15.7.3.5.3.1. The solid waste component shall be granted if any of the following conditions are met: 32 161 1' 3.15.7.3.5.3.1.1. The required pubic facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.3.1.2. The required public facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.3.1.3. The required public facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of subsections 3.15.7.3.5.3.1.1. and 3.15.7.3.5.3.1.2. 3.15.7.3.5.4. Drainage facilities. The drainage component shall be granted if the proposed development has a drainage and water management plan that has been approved by the environmental services division that meets the LOS for Capital Drainage Facilities defined in subsection 3.15.3.26.43.22. 3.15.7.3.5.5. Park and recreation facilities. 3.15.7.3.5.5.1. The parks and recreation component shall be granted if any of the following conditions are met: 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.1. The required public facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.2. The required public facilities are under construction at the time of building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.3. The required public facilities are the subject of a binding contract executed for the construction of those public facilities, which provides for the commencement of actual construction within one year of issuance of a building permit. 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.4. The required public facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of subsections 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.1., 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.2. and 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.3. 3.15.7.3.5.6. Road facilities. The road component shall be considered based upon whether sufficient capacity is available based on the findings of the transportation ..................... ~ .... *~ impact analysis, which shall be based upon the provisions of 3.15.6.4.1 and 3.15.6.4.3.2. ~ ........ '~ ~ .... ' ..... ~ ; .... ~:.4~ ~ (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 96-66, § 3.J.; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.1.) Sec. 3.15.8. Liberal construction, severability, and penal provision. 33 161 3.15.8.1. The provisions of this division shall be liberally construed to effectively carry out its purpose in the interest of the public health, safety, welfare and convenience. 3.15.8.2. If any section, phrase, sentence or portion of this division is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not effect the validity of the remaining portion. 3.15.8.3. A violation of this division shall be misdemeanor punishable according to law; however, in addition to or in lieu of any criminal prosecution, Collier County shall have the power to sue in civil court to enforce the provisions of this division. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.1.) 34 BUILDING S TA TlS TICS 0 0 t~l. luJJecl 161 1 ! ! ~nl~A I I , t I I ®nueA~U 8UOl~Oedeul 0 0 0 -' 8uop, oecleul 0 0 E eUOl:~oecleul 0 0 0 euoBoecieul Carter Henning COyle Coletta 6 MINUTES Members Present: Barbara Cacchione, Karen Homiak, Mark Lindner,, Essie Serrata, Mario Valle and Susan Golden Members Absent: David Ellis, Larry Keesey, Joe Patemo and Mark Strain Staff present: Commissioner Donna Fiala, County Attorney Patrick White, Cormac Giblin Guests: Vince Cautero, Debrah Forester, Phil Peters, John R. Wood Barb Cacchione reviewed the nonprofit Housing Development Corporation (HDC) concept and proposed budget of approximately $150,000.00 in the first year. Some of the potential start-up funds for the HDC could come from the "opt- out fee", CDBG, SHIP, linkage fees, general revenue and other sources. Mario Valle suggested that the nonprofit HDC could assist the PUD developers and others with the actual implementation and building of the required affordable housing units. 2. Quorum present. Minutes from September 30, 2002 were presented. Motion to approve Lindner/Homiak passed unanimously. 3. The draft Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance was reviewed including Cormac's October 7th email of"Key Decision Areas". There was a discussion about a notice of action so the development community is aware of the proposed IZO and don't rush to get rezoning and circumvent the proposed process. The Board of County Commissioners can direct staff to prepare a LDC amendment outside of the twice each year cycle. Patrick White suggested that the committee develop a work product that can be taken to the BCC. The committee can request that the BCC review the IZO as a special amendment to the LDC for workforce housing. The committee reviewed members position on a buy-out provision. For discussion purposes, Golden/Lindner motioned to create a buy-out provision. Motion unanimous. The members present concurred with the need for a buy-out provision but suggest that there be a high price to opt-out. However, for a new rezoning of undeveloped land, the m6mbers do not want to ......... :~:7~:~' provide a buy-out provision as there is sufficient opportunity prio~.~l~l~rnent to incorporate the required affordable units in their propOsed mix. Mario Vialle Copies To: 161 1 stressed the need to place the workforce units near places of employment to reduce the transportation impacts on the road network. There was extensive discussion that "clean slate"/no vertical construction sites requesting rezoning would not be allowed a buyout provision. Motion Cacchione/Lindner: At the time of rezoning, those PUD's with more than 50 residential units or undeveloped parcels of land that contemplate more than 50 units will not be allowed a buy-out provision from the inclusionary zoning requirements. Passed unanimously. It was suggested that the developer be responsible for demonstrating that they are more than 35% developed and vested. There was a lengthy discussion regarding creating a vesting provision within the IZO. The developer would present an argument before a hearing officer who would determine vesting and potential exemption from IZO. It was also suggested that a developer's agreement be the vehicle that triggers the issuance of certificate of adequate public facility. The certificate of adequate public facility is the primary incentive available. Those developments that pay to opt out or build units outside the boundaries of their development will not qualify for preferred status at the head of the certificate of adequate public facility line. Patrick White said that the Board has established sunsetting provisions that would be helpful for the committee to look at. Meeting adjourned at 5:55 p.m. Submitted by, Susan Golden, secretary ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL Fiala AG EN DA Carter November 6, 2002 9:00 A.M. Henning-- Coyle _--~-- Coletta _ /~,/' Commission Boardroom W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F") - Third Floor II. III. IV. Roll Call Approval of Agenda Approval of October 16, 2002 Meeting Minutes Land Use Petitions A. Planned Unit Development Amendment No. PUDA-2002-AR-2702 "Lands End Preserve PUD" Section 4 & 5, Township 51 South, Range 26 East Old Business: New Business: Brief discussion about proposed interagency agreement for wildlife protection. VII. Council Member Comments VIII. Public Comments IX. Adjournment Council Members: Please notify the Environmental Services Department Administrative Assistant no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 30, 2002 if you cannot attend this meeting or if you have a conflict and will abstain from voting on a petition (732-2505) General Public: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to ensure tha.t...a, verbatim record of proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and e~ideh(~'e- upon which the appeal is to be based. ~l~isc. Cortes: Date: Copies 1. Meeting called to order 2. Roll Call :~. Approval of Minutes - Meetings of September 10 and October 8, 2002 Z~. Landscape Maintenance Report 5. Landscape Architect's Report - Mike McGee 6. Transportation Landscape Services Report - Val Prince, Robert Petersen a. Current budget b. Update on Sunshine Boulevard median improvements c. Progress on 18~h Place & 18~h Street medians d. Replacement lamp post for Tropicana Boulevard ?. Committee Members~ Reports 8. Old Business 9. New Business Public Comments Adjournment Misc. Corres: Copies To: 161 1 SUMMARY OF MOTIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval of the minutes of the September 10th meeting: As there was no quorum present, approval of the minutes was postponed. 5. TRANSPORATION OPERATIONS REPORT Bob Petersen reported that the fill that was installed was below standard and will need to be removed and replaced at the contractor's expense. The sleeves and curbing were acceptable. Mike McGee estimated the cost for a Live Oak tree, plants, pavers and irrigation will be approximately $2300 for each location, 18"~ Place and Sunset and 18"' Street and 40th Terrace. If three sables are used, the estimate will be reduced by about $300 for each area. Sabina Musci moved to set a cap of $6000 for these improvements and to share in the cost of the pavers; seconded by Cheryle Newman. Motion passed by consensus of those present. 161 1 Meeting called to order at 4:05 p.m. at the Golden Gate Community Center. Roll Call - Present: Cheryle Newman and Sabina Musci, members. Robert Petersen and Val Prince, Landscape Operations; Robert Kindelan, Commercial Land Maintenance; Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Jacqueline Silano, recording secretary. Guest: Gerald Mords, Senior Planner, Transportation Operations. Absent: Bonner Bacon and Phil Mudrak, members; Approval of the minutes of the September 10th meeting: As there was no quorum present, approval of the minutes was postponed. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT A. Mr. Kindelan advised that scheduled fertilization for September has been completed. There were some minor irrigation problems - fuses for the pumps were replaced. He will be adjusting the irrigation in the dry areas. Medium sized trees will be tdmmed on the Parkway and C.R. 951 A & B; scheduled fertilization for October and mulching will be done within the next couple of weeks. The plant materials that need to be replaced will take place when the trees are tdmmed. TRANSPORATION OPERATIONS REPORT Gerald Morris asked whether the committee wished to install pavers on 18"' Place. He estimated the cost for 22 square yards of concrete (~ $30 plus approximately $3,000 for pavers. Mike McGee will be meeting with Mr. O'Gara, as he will be needing pavers also which should reduce the cost since more will be needed. Bob Petersen reported that the fill that was installed was below standard and will need to be removed and replaced at the contractor's expense. The sleeves and curbing were acceptable. Mike McGee estimated the cost for a Live Oak tree, plants, pavers and irrigation will be approximately $2300 for each location, 18th Place and Sunset and 18~ Street and 40~h Terrace. If'three sables are used, the estimate will be reduced by about $300 for each area. Sabina Musci moved to set a cap of $6000 for these improvements and to share in the cost of the pavers; seconded by Cheryle Newman. Motion passed by consensus of those present. (Gerald Morris left at 4:30 p.m.) 161 1' 6. TRANSPORTATION LANDSCAPE SERVICES REPORT There was a discussion regarding the future improvements and partnering with Parks and Recreation for the two medians on Sunshine Boulevard. Bob Petersen will contact Joe Delate and report on this next month. Copies of the budget statement were distributed and reviewed. Val Prince provided details. Bob Petersen noted that the new accounting system would not be on line until January. Bob Petersen reported that he met with Mike McGee and Mr. O'Gara to reevaluate how many trees need to be removed. Cheryle Newman noted that Mr. O'Gara would be going before the Planning Board on October 17 to request rezoning for additional retail shopping space. D. Bob Petersen advised that the replacement light post is expected to ship on October 18*h to ardve 10 days ~ater. E.B Simmons will do the installation. 7. COMMI'i-rEE MEMBERS' REPORTS Cheryle Newman expressed her concems about a section on Tropicana Boulevard that seems very dark. There was a brief discussion regarding up lighting, lights in the median and on either side of the alleyway. 8. OLD BUSINESS A. Theincreasein speedlimiton Tropicana was pulled from the BCC consent agenda. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 5:10 p.m. The next scheduled meeting will be held on November 12th @ 4:00 p.m. at the Golden Gate Community Center. Fiela _ ~. ---...- Carter HenningT ~, , --- C, oyle _ coletm ~'"' - Advisory Committee 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 SUMMARY MINUTES OF OCTOBER 9, 2002 III. Vm Approval of Minutes: Tom Moved to approve the minutes of Sept. 1t, 2002. Carried unanimously. Seconded Maurice, TRANSPORTION SERVICES REPORT: Next month Bob Petersen will present a summary of what the revenues were for the last fiscal year and ending balance. Gloria Hararas (Budget Analyst) was introduced and will help the Committee find past expenditures and revenues. Bill Neai would like to have a complete summary of all the revenues since inception of the MSTU. Bill feels the figures will show about $1.5 million spent. Not the $2,977,000 the County is showing. ^ full accounting for the completer project of expenses and revenues and the typical operation expenses is needed. Gloria will report back to the Committee next month with her findings. Tom stated they felt strongly about getting the corrected figures and will pursue this if they have to get an independent outside audit. She asked if the committee has approached Dwight Brock for an audit. Bill responded they will approach him if they canl get the information needed. OLD BUSINESS: A. Update on Mailing for Name Change The letter was drafted, reviewed and corrections made. Bill will meet with Bob to review and mail. D. Liability Insurance Coverage: Bob will get in writing from Risk Management that the Committees have the same coverage as the Commissioners or elected officials and have it for the next meeting. E. Right Turn Lane onto Bayshore: Bill talked with Commissioner Coyle to look into the situation and see if it can be done. tvlisc..Corres: 0ate: ~ t \ Copies To: ~dviso~y Committee 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite 212 Naples FL 34104 October 9, 2002 III. Chairman Bill Neal called the meeting to order at 4:05 PM. ATTENDANCE: A. Members: Bill Neal, Tom Welstead, Maurice Gutierrez, Ed McCarthy, Dave Benson (excused) B. Collier County: Bob Petersen, Val Prince C. Others: Robert Kinderian-Commercial Land Maintenance, Tom Shadez, Clyde Shadley, Sue Chapin-Manpower Services The new member, Mr. Ed McCarthy, was welcomed and Bob will get him a 'New Member' packet at the next meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Tom moved to approve the minutes of Sept. 11, 2002. Seconded Maurice. Carried unanimously. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: Bob Petersen handed out the Budget. He noted the forms airs changing and introduced Val Prince. Val covered the Revenues first. Next month they will present a summary of what the revenues were for last year and the ending balance. Bill would like to have a complete summary of all the revenues since inception of the MSTU. Bob asked Gloda Harairss (Budget Analyst) to address the committee and see if she can help with their requests. Bill referred to a sheet that was passed out in the past in which it showed the committee will have spent $2,977,000. on the bridge project. He told Gloria the if the Revenues collected since the MSTU was organized, plus the income from the County, and a grant of $200,000, and the expenditures in each category, a balance in the Committees favor will be found. The advance or loan from the County of $570,000 has not been spent by the Committee, but the County is charging them. Discussion of figures was explained to Gloria hoping she can find a solution to the problem of accounting. Bill feels the figures will shew about $1.5 million spent. A full accounting for the complete project of expenses and revenues and the typical operation expenses is needed. Discussion followed on the grants, Gloria will report back to the Committee next month. The committee is also asking for a breakdown of the $25,000 that is paid to the County for the MSTU. Bob indicated those expenditures on the budget sheet of the transfer figures. He explained each item on the budget sheet. Bill said this is the best report they have seen. He asked of Val how many dollars airs going to be spent this fiscal year. Val pointed out the operating expenses will be $283,300. Approx. $500,000 including the two projects will be spent along with the $300,000 advance. Theirs may be a surplus of $315,000 if the $300,000 is not a legitimate expense to the Committee. They want to make sums they are not spending moms monies than they airs collecting in taxes. VI. Bob & Val talked about the expenses for the bridge and that Simmons has not been paid yet. It was noted the "Operating" and "Other Miscellaneous Services" are for tapes, paper, Manpower Services or any other secretarial services needed. The "Other Contractual Services" are for the actual Landscape Maintenance - a one year Contract bid out with two year renewal extended to a three year renewal for both parties. Other categories were discussed and the committee again asked about the violation collections. Bob will meet with Risk Management and ask them the information needed. Gloda mentioned to the Committee that she will work with finance and Val very closely. She will get the information as soon as she can and report back to the Committee. Tom stated they feel strongly about getting the corrected figures and will pursue this if they have to get an independent outside audit. She asked if the Committee has approached Dwight Brock for an audit. Bill responded that they will approach him if they can't get the information needed. Bill has already had discussions with Commissioner Coyle. Commissioner Coyle asked if Botner's fees were in the report that he received. Val reminded the Committee this is a draft of which he will have the correct figures for Sue to mail out with the minutes. Bob reported the Board approved the Contract for Kris Tel - lower of two bids. ($51,400 the other $91,000) It was awarded to the lowest qualified bidder. Bob reported on the work Road & Bddge were doing on the bddge. He also asked Pam Lulich to do a Landscape plan, and summarized the work yet to be done. He will set up a pre-construction meeting next Monday and start construction the following Monday with a 60 day completion date. The concrete work is $165,000 and is concerned about the funds. Bill is concerned about funds also and need to have them identified since he would like to see the project finished by the end of the year. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT: Robert reported the lights were out and Simmons was contacted. They are on one circuit, so consequently they all go out at the same time. When there is an accident, he gives instructions to shut the master switch off for safety reasons. Tdmming of the palms are being done this week. The pavers will be looked at to minimize the tdp hazards that are occurring. A fertilizer application is scheduled for October, and the mulch is scheduled for November. Bill wanted Robert to know they are doing a great job and are appreciated. OLD BUSINESS: A. Update on Mailing for Name Change - The letter was drafted, reviewed and corrections made. The committee went through the list and chose which ones they will hand deliver. Sue will make the corrections on the Bayshore Letterhead and e-mail back to Bob. Bill will meet on Monday with Bob to review and mail. B. Bridge - discussed earlier. C. Lights - Bob contacted Ron Stedman to do the study at no charge. D. Liability Insurance Coverage - The Committee has the same coverage as the Commissioners or elected officials. Bob will get it in writing from Risk Management and have it with the packet for next month. 161 VIE VIII. Grants - Bob will call Madene Foord and ask her for a summary of Grants that have been granted to the Bayshore MSTU. Right Turn Lane on Bayshore - Bill talked with Commissioner Coyle to look into the situation and see if it can be done. NEW BUSINESS - None PUBLIC COMMENTS - There was two members of the public in attendance. Meeting was adjoumed at 5:30 PM. The next meeting is at 4:00 pm, November 13~, 2002 At Collier County Transportation Road Maintenance 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 212 Naples, FL 324104 Advisory Gommittee 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL. 34104 October 10, 2002 Bayshore Drive Property Owner RE: Changing name of Bayshore Drive to Botanical Garden Parkway Dear Bayshore Drive Property Owner: The Bayshore Drive Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee has voted to change the name of Bayshore Ddve. The now name will better reflect the direction of beautification and redevelopment that is occurring in this area. It has been the desire of many since the beginning of the beautification effort to make this change. After considering many different names, the committee vo~ed to recommend changing the name to Botanical Garden Parkway. As part of the name changing process, it is required that every property owner who has a Bayshore Drive address be notified of the recommended name change and to obtain a simple majority of the affected property owners. The Committee felt this was an excellent time to implement the name change due to the fact that our Area Cede will be changing which will require updating stationery, signage etc. Attached is a copy of a petition, with a stamped, addressed retum envelope, that we would like to have you sign and return to us. The committee is venj excited about this name change and encourages your positive support. It will be great benet"R to all those who live in the Bayshore area. If you would like to discuss this change call Bob Petersen, (the liaison to the Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee), or myself, Bill Neal, (Chairman of the Bayshore Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee). We would be happy to talk with you either in person or over the telephone. Please call Bob Petersen at 213-5871, or me, Bill Neal at 774-6325. We look forward to talking with you. Please sign the petition and return by November 1, 2002. Thank you. Very truly youm, Bill Neal, Chairman, Bayshore Drive Beautification MSTU (Municipal Service Taxing Unit) Petition to Change the Name of Bayshore Drive to Botanical Garden Parkway The Bayshore Drive Beautification MSTU has voted to change the name of Bayshore Drive to Botanical Garden Parkway. In order to institute this change, 50% plus one of the Property Owners that have a Bayshore Address must agree to this change. Please indicate by signing below your preference. If you choose not to return this petition, please be aware that your lack of response to this petition will be considered a vote in favor of this name change. Name: Bayshore Address: Phone: FOR: Date (Your MSTU Advisory Committee Supports this position) Against Date Attached is a copy of a petition, with a stamped, addressed return envelope, that we would like to have you sign and return to us. Failure to Return this Petition will be considered a vote in favor of this name change. Return by November 1, 2002 Advisory Committee 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 212 Naples FL 34104 161 AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 13'm~ 2002 I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER II. ATTENDANCE III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 9, 2002 III. IV. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. Report from Gloria Hararas LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT: VI. OLD BUSINESS: A. Name Change Vote B. Bridge C. Lights D. Liability Insurance Coverage - Packet E. Packet for New Member F. Grants G. Right Turn Lane on Bayshore NEW BUSINESS: VII. PUBUC COMMENTS VIII. ADJOURNMENT The next meeting is Wednesday, December 11, 2002 Transportation Road Maintenance 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 212 Naples, FL 34104 rmll "4 0 C: BI, 161 ~mm ~ m~Oz ~ ~ ~ ~m~ ~ ~ ~ ' · im ~ ~ i~ ~o < ~o~ m <~m mil >0~ ~ z -~ m) ,~ m~ ~ ~m mml ......... ~ ~ IIS~ ,:: ~ ................. ~ . . ,~- ~ ~ m II ~ II ~o co ~0 --~ 0 o ~0 --~ OO -~ ~o -~ co oo --~o .-~ ~ o c~ --~ ~ o -~ 00 ~ co -~ o ~ oo O0 ~m ~m co ro o {.~ co ~o o o o~o oooo m m 0oo 0oo ooo oooo o oooo ooo o ..~ o o 0oo0ooo ooooo o o m m Z m m C~rter Her~ing ~ _ Coyle Coletta 1-751Golden Gate Ad Hoc Landscaping,,,., ,, Beautification Committee Transportation Operations Department 2705 Horseshoe Ddve South Naples FL 34104 October 9, 2002 IV* Al Moore called the meeting to order at 10:07 A.M. ATTENDANCE: A. City of Naples: Bonnie MacKenzie (Absent) B. Golden Gate Civic Orga~_ni~tion: Bill Poteet, Tun O'Crara C. Unincorporated Collier County: Al Moore, Thomas A. Collins II, Mark Morton D. Collier County: Pam Lulich-ASLA Landscape Oixa~ons Mgr., Nancy Siemion- Landscape Architect, Bob Petersen-Road Maintenance Landscape E. Others: Michael McGee-McGee & Associates, FDOT Landscape Architecture Consultant, Sue Chapin-Manpower Secretarial Services Mr. Moore introduced the new member Jim O'Gara. He has been very active in the Golden Gate MSTU. He is with Marquette Development Corp. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes were reviewed and a correction was made under New Business that the Meandering Sidewalks "were not" approved. They will not have meandering sidev~Jk~. Bill Poteet moved to approve the minutes of June 13, 2002 with the above correction. Seconded Mark Morton. Carried. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. Resnlts of Sept. 24, 2002 Board Meeting: Pam Lulich reported and handed out a copy of the Executive Summary. The Board of County Commissioners approved the hardscape elements: the decorative railing and the decorative mesh fence e~mated at $100,000. The lower portion of the bridge, texturing of the bridge pier, column and beams, the painting, and the slope pavement under the bridge was approved at an estimated cost of $95,034. B. Reimbursable MPO Grant Awards ($100,000): The MPO Grant applied for and received is for $100,000 (reimbursable). The Board is funding the Hardscape for $195,000 - making the net expense by the County is $95,000. The $300,000 request for landscaping Buffer and Irrigation was denied by the Board. C. 60% Plan Review-McGee & Associates: Mike McGee has been asked to produce the 60% Plan by FDOT. Pam asks the Committee ff they want to pursue any additional funding for Landscaping. They have to direct Mike to continue with his pla~ Bill Poteet mentioned the Board had asked ff the City of Naples would be contributing. Pam stated that at the September 24, 2002 meeting when asked by the Board her answer was "no" since this was their first attempt for outside funding. She said there is FDOT money and possibly matching funds available. The maximum, amount for the Grants is $300,000. Several different grants can be applied for. Marlene Ford, Collier County, will be of assistance. ~TiSC. Cortes: Mike McC~ stated they am to provide 60% to FIX)T next week. He ri.e? a, _ I_ cia c tion of what the 400,000 be on. the co, p, to .r n Jtem# Copies To: 1 and Ramps or disburse it throughout the whole site and addressing some of the retention ponds off site and side access roads into the residential community? Mark asked ff it made sense to have a design outline with drawings and esthetics. He feds they need an outline presentation to show persons or corporations for funding requests. Mike displayed his 60% design on the visualizer for the Committee. He showed and explained where the raised planters on the bridge, palm tree plantings for the on and off ramps, and other plantings are located. Mark Morton asked about a Master Plan and Mike agreed and indicated it would be under a separate contract with the County. Al asked about the cost of a Master Plan. Mike estimated between $5-10,000 for color rendering and cost estimates. Pam stated that FDSOT has not budgeted for conceptual plans and that Mike McGee is being paid for construction documents only. The Committee is not funded and has no budget in place to fund any proposed design. Pam stated she will verify this with FDOT. 61 Mark Morton moved to hire McGee & Associates in the range of $5-10,000 for a color rendering and Master Plan for the entire Interchange area. Seconded Bill Poteet. Carried Unanimously. Al Moore moved to approve and adopt the $300,000 for the 60% design plan from McGee & Associates. Seconded Mark Morton. Carried Unanimously. Discussion followed on thc matching grant monies. Marlenc Ford, Collier County grant coordinator, would be contacted for additional information on grants which may be available for the project. The $300,000 would address the buffer along the Interchange, and add more or larger plant material along Golden Gate. It was noted that the City of Naples has not been approached since it was the Committee's strategy to approach the Board first. At the Landscape Workshop held on September 5, 20023, the Board requested a survey be done through the League of Women Voters to poll the community in support of an urban area MSTU dedicated t the landscaping of arterial roadways. The MSTU would provide the Capital Funding road beautification. At the Workshop several requests went before the Board and were denied. Para & Bob mentioned that Norm Feder and the Board have stated that Landscaping is not included in the impact fees. More discussion followed on asking thc City of Naples for funding and when. Mark stated the County came up with $95,000 and only seems reasonable to ask the City to match $95,000 and possibly Golden Gate also. It is a gateway to both communities. He felt having a nice plan or presentation with pictures etc. would help in presenting the project in asking for funding. It was discussed that matching funds need to be in place before matching grants are given. Mike mentioned there are Highway Grants but they are competition grants. The committee has to determine the amount of money they wish to ask for. The $100,000 grant from the MPO is to fund the first item on their Summary. The County then advances the $100,000 when it is needed and reimbursed in 2008. Annual applications are to be in by January and usually find out in June whether the grant is awarded. Then there is an 18 month limit to spending the grant. Mark stated the next few meetings can be spent working on a Master Plan, a Booklet that lays out all the aspects of the project and costs associated with it, matching funds, and grants. The Committee would then know what they're looking for, when and what to ask for and be ready to proceed with the materials to do it. Discussion followed on extensions and time frame for the use of grants. 2 Bill Poteet moved to authorize staff to research the grant process and give the Committee some recommendations on the monies to be contributed by various sources in order to attain their total goal of $300,000 of additional Landscaping, Seconded Tom Collins. Carried Unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: A1 Moore asked what the proper protocol for the Committee is concerning reporting back to the MPO of current status and also report to the City of Naples. It was asked if a letter has been sent to the City for a replacement on the Committee. Pam will follow up with Sue Filson requesting a replacement. It was decided the Committee needs to regroup and come up with strategy, look for new grant monies and need to establish a presentation. Pam will need time to research these issues and let the Committee know at the next meeting. Time flames and scheduling were discussed in achieving the Mater Plan, presentations, researcl~ applying for grants, going to the City of Naples and having monthly meetings. Mark moved that Para put together a Project Management Schedule on decisions for the Committee, information as to when to install Landscaping at the Interchange, along with an outline of presentation materials including the grants and all information relating to them. Seconded Bill Poteet. Carried Unanimously. Tom brought up the subject of buffering for the neighborhoods. He would like to make this a priority, see some recommendations along with a proposal and implemented in the Master Plan. Right-of-way and condemnation was discussed. Nancy stated they are not required to replace landscaping loss due to a right-of-way improvement. Tom is referring to areas on public property. He's asking about enhancements perhaps to the medians, frontage roads, or buffers with 1-75. Mike McGee said it would be part of the Master Plan and work with the Committee developing the Plan. Bob said any clarification needed in what particular areas landscaping can be done should be on the Master Plan. Discussion followed on neighborhood buffers, grants, design and funding costs for various items. Tom would like to see these buffers incorporated into the plan. NEW BUSINESS: Jim O'Gara was welcomed again and gave a brief statement. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None VIII. ADJOURNMENT: Tom moved to adjourn, Seconded Mark. Meeting was adjourned at 11:25 AM. The next meeting will be announced at a later date. 3 1-751Golden Gate Ad Hoc Landscaping Beautification Committee Transportation Operations Department 2705 Horseshoe Ddve South Naples FL 34104 November 12, 2002 AGENDA L IL m. Iv'. CAIJ, MEETING TO ORDER: ATYENDANCE: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 9, 2002 TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT A. FDOT Verification of Funding for Master Plan Vo OLD BUSINESS: A. Grant Availability B. Project Management Schedule/FDOT Schedule Update C. Committee Membership Status 1. Filling Gary Galleberg's position NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC COMMENTS: ADJOURNMENT: This meeting will be held at 1:30 PM, Tuesday, November 12, 2002 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room Turner Building, Bldg. F, fa Floor Naples, FL 1-75/Golden Gate Ad Hoc Landscaping Beautification Committee Transportation Operations Department 2705 Horseshoe Ddve South Naples FL 34104 October 9, 2002 SUMMARY 011= MINUTES & MOTIONS III. Approval of Minutes: A correction was made to the June 13, 2002 minutes that the Meandering Sidewalks "were not" approved. Bill Poteet moved to approve the minutes of June 13, 2002 with the above correction. Seconded Mark Morton. Carried Transportation Services Report: A. Results of Septembers 24, 2002 Board Meeting The Board of County Commissioners approved the Hardscape elements. B. Reimbursable MPO Grants Awards The MPO Grant received is $100,000. The Board is funding the Hardscape for $195,000. C. 60% Plan Review-McGee & Associates Mark Morton moved to hire McGee & Associates in the range of 10,000 for color rendering and Master Plan for the entire interchange area. Seconded Bill Poteet. Carried unanimously. Al Moore moved to approve and adopt the $300,000 for the 60% design plan from McGee & Associates. Seconded Mark Morton. Carried Unanimously. Bill Potset moved to authorize staff to research the grant process and give the Committee some recommendations on the monies to be contributed by various sources in order to attain their total goal of $300,000 of additional Landscaping. Seconded Tom Collins. Carried Unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: Mark Morton moved that Para put together a Project Management Schedule on decisions for the Committee, information as to when to install Landscaping at the Interchange, along with an outline of presentation, materials including the grants and all information relating to them. Seconded Bill Poteet. Carried unanimously. OPINION OF COST"A" FOR ~D$CAPE CONCr. PT WIIdflower pMntlng. (1% of budget Federal requirement) L.Ittoml plantings in pond. (Gounty bDO requirement) Brldg® pMnt~8 (Gommunity recommendation) 3,000.00 4,000.00 ~8,500.00 1. Golden Gate Plrkw~y Median8 t thru :3 . (Medians 58,000 SCl. ft. ~ $2.50 p.t.f.) (Ramp Embankments 31,656 sq, ft. 0t $2,50 p.i.f.} Totll: - - 8300,000.00 ( Opinion of co~t numbem contain no contingency funding) FDOT Project I.~nd"cipe.Budget: $300,000.00 Ih, * ll:m. ironmeml M milt * ~ - S0~Tsdud Trdl But I P.O. Bos 80S1 NNb,, Jledds 34101 lqJono ~41) 417.4/0'7 * I.CQN * Illin (~41) 41'/.4'7M Z b mo,') .-.-i f,,4 i;::;i t,o Z ~:;um ~ m ~" -nz n F- Fq 3:> ;;~ I;::zl Z r-1c F" Z t3 t~ "0 < -.q x~ m m Fq ~ ~ Fr-i P-I Z Cz, F- Frl ]> n .Z ~ ..~ t:::::l P-I Z P'l ~ r~ Frl t::;iZ t::;I ~ T Z ._0 :~,. C3 7 CZ P'I Z m~m Fq Z n~m m r.-1 z z 63 r"q z I 0 I'~ r'q o z m~x m --q ]> :Z> ::)> Z Z z ,-. rrI . SCALE~ 1' = 150' (_J1 LJ'I bj CE) £1 h S T L j___ I - 75 AT GOLDEN GATE INTERCHANGE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT 'A' C~I I lpg ~.t'tl IM'T"V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STATUS REPORT FOR THE BOARD'S REVIEW OF THE INTERCHANGE ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS REQUESTED BY THE GOLDEN GATE / 1-75 AD HOC BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE. OBJECTIVE: Status report for the Board's review of the Committee's selection of bridge improvements, lighting, and landscape beautification for the 1-75/Golden Gate Interchange, and authorize the Committee to negotiate design options on unfunded items for subsequent Board approval. CONSIDERATION: In February 27, 2001, the Board approved the formation of the 1-75/Golden Gate Parkway Ad Hoc Beautification Committee (Committee) to advise on the landscaping and other aesthetic enhancements for the 1-75/Golden Gate Interchange at the request of the Metropolitan Planning Organization. The Committee has provided guidance in the aesthetic appearance of the 1-75/Golden Gate corridor and coordinated with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) as they developed their detailed design plans. In the Streetscape Master Plan, the 1-75/Golden Gate Interchange was designated as a Transportation Network Gateway. As a gateway to the Community, the Committee focused on maintaining the residential character of the area consistent with current zoning. The methodology of the Committee was to incorporate the residential character into the design, focus on the concerns of the community, look at the long-term maintenance, and analyze the cost of each design element. Initially, the Committee members believed that they had $1,000,000 dedicated to landscaping and irrigation alone. The Committee discovered that this figure was an approximation based on the initial FDOT budget. The actual FDOT Budget which FDOT provided during the PD&E Study, allocated $874,000.00 for landscape and irrigation, conventional lighting, special signal poles, noise wall aesthetic treatment, special light poles, bike lanes, wider sidewalks, and a contingency (Attachment No. 1). The aesthetic enhancements to the bridge will help maintain the residential character of the corridor they include the following recommended Committee expenditures: median planters; decorative wall and columns for light poles on the bridge; eight (8) decorative light poles on the bridge; and brick pavers on the bridge sidewalk and median. The total cost for these non-landscape items is estimated to be $150,318.00, leaving a landscape budget of $296,144.00 (Attachment No. 2). The Committee estimates the project to cost'$1,369,000.00;_an estimated $495,000 above the funding capabilities of FDOT. The items the Committee would like the Board to consider are as follows: FDOT had originally proposed a chain-link pedestrian-walk cage along the sides of the bridge, which the Committee was able to eliminate from the design. The current design incorporates a more decorative mesh screen. However, the Committee is not satisfied with the appearance of the decorative mesh, which is a federal requirement on bridges that have pedestrian sidewalks. The Committee is exploring design solutions and has decided to move toward a decorative grillwork screen enhancement to provide a visual buffer and to make the project a signature structure. Conceptual designs were presented at a Public Meeting on June 6, 2002 and were well received by the Community. The estimated additional cost is $100,000 (Attachment No. 2). The Committee has focused its efforts and limited financial resources on bridge superstructure enhancements and landscaping. These remaining hardscape components are unfunded: texturing the bridge pier, column and beams ($70,656.00); and painting the slope pavement under the Executive Summary 1-75/Golden Gate Interchange Committee Recommendations Page 2 of 2 161 1 bridge or texturing and painting (max $24,378.00). The total estimate for these two lower portion enhancements of the bridge is $95,034.00 The landscape budget of $296,144.00 will provide basic landscaping and irrigation along Golden Gate Parkway from 60th Street SW to 66th Street SW. This basic landscaping will not provide the necessary visual buffer needed to screen the adjacent residences. In addition, there are several water retention areas that will require natural aquatic planting and landscape buffers. The Committee would like further analysis from FDOT describing the impact upon the existing buffer and the opportunity to focus on irrigating these areas for future landscaping. Additional funds in the amount of $300,000 are needed for landscaping these areas and for enhancing the areas near residences. The project has been awarded $100,000 in reimbursable FDOT enhancement grants. These additional funds would be available in Fiscal Year 07/08. FISCAL IMPACT: The total estimated construction cost is $1,369,000.00 of which $874,000.00 is budgeted by FDOT for the project. The remaining balance of $495,000.00 is being requested of the County. Although an FDOT enhancement grant of $100,000 has been awarded for the project, which would be reimbursed to the County leaving a difference of $395,034.00 as a net County contribution to this project. If the Board agrees to fund all or a portion of these additional enhancements, it would be budgeted for in Fiscal Year 07/08. An estimated annual maintenance amount of $200,000 would be budgeted in Fund 111 MSTD General Fund/Landscape Operations in Fiscal year 07/08. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated with this project. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board accept this status report and provide direction to staff with respect to the added enhancements requested by the Ad Hoc Committee. If the Board determine that additional funding is in the best interest of the County, then staff also request to budget for the project's capital and maintenance costs. PREPARED BY: Pamela J. Lulich, ASLA, Landscape Operations Manager Date: REVIEWED B Y: Edward J. Kant, PE, Transportation Operations Director Date: APPROVED BY: Norman E. Feder, AICP, Transportation Administrator Date: Attachments: No. 1 - Original FDOT Budget Estimate Breakdown No. 2 - Revised Budget Breakdown (Funded v. Unfunded) No. 3 - Plan View of Interchange No. 4-Elevation of Proposed Interchange JEB BUSH GOVERNOR Florida Department'of Transportation August 16, 2001 MGR-L 13-01 Attachment 1 161 THOMAS F. BARRY, 3R. SECRETARY 1 1-75/Golden Gate Interchange Advisory Committee Transportation Operations Depamnent 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 Reference: Breakdown of Estimated Costs of Amenities 1-75 at Golden Gate Parkway New Interchange Financial Management ID No. 200732-1-32-01 Dear Committee Members: As requested at the Committee meeting of August 9, 2001, the following is a detailed breakdown of the estimated costs of the amenities that were agreed to by the FDOT during the PD&E Study; Landscape & Irrigation Conventional Lighting (in lieu of high mast) Special Signal Poles (2 locations) Noise Wall Aesthetic Treatment Special (Aesthetic) Light Poles Bike Lanes Wider Sidewalk (from 5' to 6') o $300,000.00 $208,000.00 (increase) $ 60,000.00 (increase) $ 80,000.00 $ 32,000.00 $ 32,000.00 $ 16,000.00 Subtotal = $728,000.00 20% Contingency (includes Mobilization, MOT, etc.) $146,000.00 Grand Total = $874,000.00 (increase) If you have any questions, please contact me at (941) 461-4300. Director, Southwest Area Office MGR\lss CC; Nicole Mills, FDOT Bryan Dennis, FDOT Johnny Limbaugh, FDOT Sarah Clarke, FDOT District One, Southwest Area Office 2295 Victoria Avenue*Post Office Box 1030*Fort Myers, FL 33902-1030 (941) 4614300 *(941) 338-2353 (Fax) * MS 1-98 vvww.d ot:.stat;e.fl.us ~ RECYCLED PAPER GOLDEN GATE//-75 INTERCHANGE LANDSCAPE BUDGET IDEA COST FUNDING ENTITY INCORPORATE / WAIT / VETOED Curb and gutter the $225,000.00 Landscaping budget Vetoed frontase roads Decorative Lighting $1921.00 per 30' pole, FDOT Eliminate except on based on Mediterra bridge. Committee fixture from voted for std. 30' Architectural Area light poles spun Lighting. aluminum finish w/ 400 watt metal halide £~xtu res~ Chri~ta~s Attachment Approx. $25.00 / pole FDOT Incorporate Wiring Meandering $16,037.00 FDOT Eliminate- use Sidewalks funds toward brick pavers - sidewalk & median* Integral color $7274.00 (sw) FDOT Eliminate per to sidewalk and concrete $11,178.00 (sep) county's concern separator regarding maintenance - use funds toward brick pavers* Median planters on $66,500.00 Landscaping budget Incorporate. Oval bridge with decorative shaped planters 10' fencing long x 5' wide, 1 every 50'. Connect planters with deco fence. Color? Style? Overpass fencing Black vinyl coated FDOT Incorporate per mesh fence included FHWA requirement in DOT construction estimate. A change in fence would be a deduction from the landscaping budget. Decorations for wire Depends on size Landscaping budget Wait. Pending next mesh fence meeting (ex. Manatees with ($102,000.00, #1) waves and sea grass) ($192,000.00, #2) Wait - price Decorative metal Price Pending dependent work similar to Coastland Mall 16'! 1 Integral color on the $14,560.00 FDOT Incorporate. Federal Standards color to bridge. Outside match as close as bridge beams, piers possible to the and columns. English Ivy Green. Integrate color on $10,944.00 FDOT Previous vote was to incorporate. What barrier, color? Paint existing bridge $58,240.00 Landscaping budget Wait fe~_mres Brick pavers in $37,400.00 sidewalks Landscaping budget Incorporate- median and sidewalk $68,567.00 median sidewalks and ($55.00 / SY) decorative border in median (cost to be determined)* Texturize the bridge $18,240 (on barrier) Tandscaping budget Wait components with $17,472 (on exist concrete spray form piers) $34944 (on exist piers, columns, and beams) Total $ 70,656.00 p_alnting o£ slope $20,315.00 Landscaping budget Wait pavement, under bridge. Texlan-ize slope $24,378.00 Landscaping budget Wait pavement (inc. color) Moclifiedjersey $43,750.00 Landscaping budget , Incorporate barrier, as depicted on (combination o£ Pain's drawing, barrier wall and columns listed below.) Columns for light See line above. Landscaping budget Incorporate poles, as depicted on Pain's drawing. Budget Summary: 300,000.00 80,000.00 32,000.00 16,037.00 7,274.00 11,178.00 landscaping budget noise wall aesthetic treatment painting light poles meandering sidewalks * integral color- sidewalk * integral color- median separator $ 446,462.00 available funding Expenditures: $ 66,500.00 4.3,750.00 2,168.00 37,400.00 5,ooo.oo $ 150,318.00 median planters barrier wall and columns for light poles on bridge decorative lights on bridge - 8 lights brick pavers for sidewalks on bridge * brick pavers for median border - estimate * 1 Total: $ 446,462.00 - 150,318.00 $ 296,144.00 * Discussed at meeting held May 30, 2002. official vote. Consensus of members present; no quorum for ATTACHMENT%4 PPI ~:18 GAP FAX COVER SHEET To: Pam Lullich Company' COLLIER COUNTY Fax Number · 1 941 659 5787 From · Elena Allison Company' GAP Architectural Fax Number' Subject · I - 75 GOLDEN GATE INTERCHANGE Pages including cover page: 2 Time · 4:14:28 PM Date · 7/29/2002 MESSAGE Attached is pricing requested by Spencer Fabrications. I apologize for the delay but it took a long time for the supplier to respond with their materials cost. We are happy to provide you with any additional information or assistance when you need it. WinFax PRO Cover Page SPENCER FABRICATIONS, INC. 29511 County Road 561 - Tavares, FL 32778-9492 Phooe: (352) 343-0014 - Fax: (352) 343-8899 16{ I "Quotation" To: Re; Gdll Inserts for Chain Link Fencing 1-75 Golden Gate Interchange Collier County D.O.T. - Para Lulich Attn: We are pleased to quote on the following materials: Date: July 29, 2002 Quote: 02-0221 Ten'ns: See Below F.O.B. Job,site Qty. Approx. 900 lineal feet- Fabricate Grill Inserts for attachment to Chain Link Fencing. Framework from 2" x 6" x .125 aluminum tubing with decorative leaves laser cut and formed from .063 aluminum sheet. Framework painted brilliant gold, and leaves painted green acrylic enamel Fabrfcated in 50' sections. Approximate weight 600 lbs. per 50' section. All Installation by others. All concrete work by others. Qty. 900 LF ~ $153.00 per LF. Approximate Freight Installation by others. - All Conc4'ete work by others. Quote does not include Sales Tax. ~/~_ ,Deposit due upon receipt of purche=~-~ order Balance due upon _compLetion of °rd~. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. Estimator = $137,700.00 = $ 1,250.00 · Please reference our quote number on your purchase order, · Delivery subject to shop workload at time of order, · Quote is good for 60 days. NOTE: THIS QUOTE IS SPENCER FABRICATIONS INTERPRETATION OF THE DRAWINGS, ANY CHANGES IN MATERIAL AND DESIGN FROM THOSE DESCRIBED IN THE QUOTE WILL ALTER THE QUOTED PRICING. ESTIMATED WEIGHT IS ONLY THAT AND ANY ENGINEERING FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE ADDED TO THE QUOTED PRICE. WITHOUT ANY SPECIFICS ON THE I~'ENCiNG, ATTACHMENT HARDWARE CANNOT I~E SPECULATED AND IS THEREFORE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS QUOTE. lulich_P From: Sent: To: Cc: Curtisdesign [Curtisdesign @email.msn.com] Thursday, June 20, 2002 7:07 AM. lulich_P Jim McMullen Subject: Golden Gate Bridge Pam Sorry I did not get this to you sooner. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. Thanks again 10/8/2002 Collier County Golden Gate Bridge Capital Manufacturing 6-20-02 Description Totals Decorative Aluminum plants with 3"x 1.5" tube frame. Flat cut out .125 alum. Plants to stand off frame at various depths. frame sections attached to std.( D.O.T. fence by other), by means of tamper proof fasteners. Faces painted two colors with frame work to be a third color. Backs of to be painted to match fence interior. Four Four sections to be 150' long x 4'-0" high. Single face $80,000 Six Decorative .125 flat cut out plant aprox. 6'-0" high. $3,000 located at pole. Painted and mounted same as 150' sections. Installation $12,000.00 Installation to include survey and permits. 1 Subtotal taxes Total I $95,0001 57O0 154oo,7ool General Notes: No lighting or high way signs are included at this time. D.O.T. fence by others and installed by others. Components are to be installed on both exterior sides of bridge. All fasteners to be stainless steel, non visible and tamper proof. 10/30/2002 Ft~l].,~ 22 7-2'48381./ ~ ~puI:t~ I'NFO ,~ PA~E Department of Public Information 3301 East Tamlami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Contact: Lavah He=el Communication and Customer Relations 774-8373 Oct. 30, 2002 FOR_IM.. MEDIATE .RELEASE BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE LOCAl. REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, November 6, 6 p.m. Community Development & Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Conference Room E Agenda 1, Roll Call 2. Adoption of Agenda 3. Minutes Hand Out - October 2, 2002 meeting Octobc'r 11, 2002 meeting 4. Announcements 5- Old Business a. Review of Submitted Proposal for the Mini-Triangle Catalyst Project b. Phase II Bayshore Drive Mixed Use Zoning Overlay - Community Meetings e. Bel-Air Motel Property Update d. Discussion and Update on Various Old Business Item.~: Davis Blvd. LightSng, Art Festiva]., Development Activity witl~i.n the CRA District, Organizational Structure, Bonding 6. Now Business .... a. Review of Draft Soop¢ of Services Document for Creation of a Compreher~sive Z~I~ ~ Plan 7. Citizen Comment, 8. Adjournment Item# [ ~0 I2 [ Not,: Ail meetings are publicly noficgd in the W. Harmon Tamer Bui. kling (Adm~ni~rafion Building F) and ~1~3(~. websi~¢. Plea~, "l~ommq Tomerli~, Principal Planner, at (239) 659-5752 if you have any que~ions about thc meeting. In accordance with tl~e ~merica~ with Di,~abil#i~ Act. per.~or~ needing a$~istance to participate in any of the.~ proceedings ~hould contact Tomerlin at lea~rt 48 fio~ry prior to th~ meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2002, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMnqlSTR~TION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FL 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. NOTE; INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN pRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILLBECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 3, 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: RUSSELL BUDD OUT 21gr OF NOVEMBER BCC REPORT- RECAPS- OCTOBER 8, 2002 CHAIRMAN'S REPORT ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS (LUNCH 12:00 P.M.- 1:00 P.M) Ao BD-2002-AR-2918, Ben Nelson, Jr., of Nelson Marine Construction, representing Paul & Linda McCullough, requesting an extension to allow for a boat dock facility protruding 50 feet into the waterway for property located at 197 San Mateo Drive, further described as Lot 32, Southport on the Bay Unit One. (Coordinator: Ross Gocheanaur) Bo VA-2002-AR-2389, Linda B. Bcrthelsen and Stuart S. McDaniel--requesting variances in the RSF-3 zoning district from the required 30 foot front yard setback pursuant to LDC Sections 2.2.4.4.4. and 2.6.2. to allow: 1) an after-the fact 5- foot variance, 25 feet, for the existing house; and 2) a 5-foot variance, to 25 feet, for a prOp0~d 15001 and screen enclosure, on property located at 571 Piper Boulevard, further described as Ix~g P{~yer Estates, Unit I, Plat Book 3, page 90 as recorded in Collier County public records, Collier C~'fiii6j', 'lq~r[~ in Section 23, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. (Coordinator: Kay Deselem) . 1 Copies To: · 161 1"' I VA=2002=AR-2431, Trna Levan requesting a 6.5 foot variance'for a pool screen enclosure in the RSF-I zoning district, from the 30-foot side yard setback requirement, to allow a 23.5 foot setback, pursuant to Land Development Code Sections 2.2.4.4.4 and 2.6.2. lA.on property located at 250 Carica Road further described as Lot 4, Block 7, Unit 2, Pine Ridge 2~a Extension. Plat Book 10, page 86 as recorded in Collier County public records, Collier County, Florida in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. (Coordinator: Kay Deselem) ' VA-2002-AR-2552, R. Brace Anderson of Young, van Assenderp, Varnadoe & Anderson, P.A., representing The Bailey Company, requesting variances m the PUD zoning district granted by Ordinance No. 92-8; 1) a variance from LDC § 2.3.16. Off-street parking and stacking requirements that require nine car stacking lengths, to allow a reduction to five-car stacking lengths; and 2) a variance from LDC § 2.8.4.4.2. that requires windows to cover a minimum of 25% of the building faqade, to allow windows to cover only the existing 10.7% of the faqade on Outparcel gl (formerly occupied by Arby's Restaurant), in the Courthouse Shadows Shopping Center located in Section 12, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida (Coordinator: Kay Deselem) (CONTINUED INDEFINITELY) Eo VA-2002-AR-2617, Mario Valle, of Creative Homes of Southwest Florida, Inc., representing Lloyd E. Wynn, requesting after-the-fact variances in the Estates (E) zoning district fi.om the required: 1) 30-foot side yard setback (LDC Section 2.2.3.4.3.1.), to allow a 14.4 feet side yard setback (a variance of 15.6 feet); and 2) 75-foot front yard setback (LDC Section 2.2.3.4.3.2.), to allow a 70.1 feet front yard setback (a variance of 4.9 feet), for property located at 2231 149 Avenue NE, further descn~eed as Golden Gate Estates Unit 16, Tract 99, Lot E-150, as recorded in Plat Book 7, pages 3-4, Collier County records, in Section 36, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. (Coordinator: Kay Deselem) Go VA-2002-AR-2908, Craig J. Pajer, P.E., of AEC National, requesting a 40-foot height variance from the required 35 feet to 75 feet in the Public Use District for the addition to the Naples Jail Center located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Building "W", Collier County Government Center, in Section 12, Township 50 South, Range 25 East. (Coordinator: Don Schneider) 0NOT BEFORE 2:00 P.M.) VA-2002-AR-2909, Craig J. Pajer, P.E., of AEC National, representing Collier County Board of Co~-igsioners, requesting a variance from the maximum height of 35 feet to 110 feet for a parking garage at the Collier County Jail. This variance is required for the 5-sto~y construction and future expansion to eight stories of a par~g garage. This request of 110 feet is 75 feet greater than that allowed in the Public Use District at this location. (Coordinator: Don Schneider) PUDZ-2002-AR-2200, Rich Yovanovich, Esquire, of Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson, representing First Baptist Church of Naples, Inc., requesting a rezone from "C-I' to "PUD" Planned Unit Development known as Mission Square PUD for property located at 1595 Pine Ridge Road, in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 10.5:t: acres. (Coordinator: Fred Reischl) CU-2002-AR-2759, Craig J. Pajer, P.E., of AEC National, Inc., representing Collier Board of County Coiiaaissioners, requesting Conditional Use 3 of the "P" Public Use zoning district to allow for the expansion of an existing jail facility for property located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, in Section 12, Township 50, Soutlh Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Don Schneider) (NOT BEFORE 2:00 P.M.) J. PDI=2002-AR-2562, D. Wayne Arnold ofQ. Grady Minor & Associates, representing B. II Development, Inc., an insubstantial change determlo~tion to the Eboli PUD revising the Master Plan to establish a specific development plan identifying building placement, on-site vehicular access, and wetland identification for property located in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida (Coordinator: Fred Reischl) 9. OLD BUSINESS: Second 2002 Growth Management Plan Amendment Cycle (DCA No. 02-02) Use including amendments to the Transportation Element, Capital Improvement Element and the Future Land Element (Continued from 10-17-02) TIME CERTAIN 1:00 P.M- ~ ~I~" 10. NEW BUSINESS 2 11. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEMS 12. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 13. ADJOURN ! 1/07/02 CCPC AGENDA./SMfLO 161 3 October~, 2002 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida, October 3, 2002 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the, Collier County Planning Commission in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Kenneth Abemathy Frank Fry Paul Mindy Lindy Adelstein Russell Budd Dwight Richardson David Wolfley Mark Strain Lora Jean Young ALSO PRESENT: Joe Schmitt, Community Dev. & Environmental Serv. Kay Deselern, Principal Planner, Planning Serv. Dept. Ray Bellows, Chief Planner, Planning Serv. Dept. Marjorie Student, Assistant Attorney Greg Garcia, Principal Planner, Trans. Planning Dept. Don Schneider, Principal Planning, Planning Serv.Dept. Fred Reischl, Principal Planning, Planning Serv. Dept. 1 Page 1 Pledge of Allegiance was recited. October 3, 2002 The meeting was called to order at 8:32 by Chairman Kenneth Abernathy. Roll Call was taken - a Quorum was established. e Addenda to the Agenda - Mrs. Young moved to ratify and approve the Agenda as per Ray Bellows. Seconded Mr. Adelstein. Carried Unanimously. Mr. Bellows mentioned Item C & D -PUDZ-2001-AR-1639, Robert'L. Duane, AICP, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing The Strand LTD and DOA-2001-AR- 1638, Robert L. Duane, AICXP, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Hardy Development Group Inc. will be continued until the next meeting. Mr. Richardson moved to continue the two PUD's mentioned until the next meeting. Seconded Mrs. Young. Carried Unanimously. The Eastern Lands meeting and Concurrency Amendments were discussed. Joe Schmitt explained the time frames and procedures. Mr. Mindy arrived at 8:45 AM. It was noted that the Election of Officers was omitted from the Agenda. Mr. Richardson moved to add it to the Agenda at 7A under Chairman's Report. Seconded Mrs. Young. Carried Unanimously. Approval of Minutes - September 5, 2002 and Amended Minutes of August 1, 2002. Mr. Richardson moved to approve Minutes of Sept. 5, 2002 and Amended Minutes of August 1, 2002, Seconded, Carried Unanimously. 5. Planning Commission Absences: Mrs. Young stated she will not be able to attend the October 17th, 2002 meeting. 6. BCC Report - Recaps - September 10, 2002 - None 7. Chairman's Report- None 7A. Mr. Strain complimented the officers in doing such a good job and moved they keep the same set of officers for the 2002-2003 year. Seconded Mr. Budd. Carried Unanimously. Advertised Public Hearings: A. VA-2002-AR-2432 -Stan Wittemore, representing W. Belden & Georgeue Burns, requesting a 5 foot rear yard variance from the required 30 feet to 25 feet for property located at 275 Kings Way, 2 Page 2 October 3, 2002 further described as Lot 13, Bock G, Fox_fire Unit 3, in Section 6, Township 50 Sdouth, Range 26 East, Comer County, Florida. Those testifying were sworn in by Mr. Kenneth Abemathy. Mr. Fred Reishl - Planning Services Dept. - He noted that staff has advised the petitioner's agent that if additional homeowners in this are of the Foxfire PUD request a reduction from the 30 foot rear yard to a 25 foot rear yard, it should be done in the form ora PUD Amendment. The staff recommends approval, subject to the conditions in the resolution. Mr. Abernathy closed the Public Hearing and opened it for discussion and motion. Mr. Budd moved to forward this petition (VA-2002-AR-2432) to the BCC and recommend approval subject to the conditions in the resolution. Seconded Mrs. Young. Carried Unanimously 9-0. B. VA-2002-AR-2445 - Douglas Eaton, PSM, representing Ben Arledge, requesting a variance in the Estates "E' Zoning district from the required 75 foot front setback. Kay Deselem- Principal Planner - Planning Services Dept. - Kay explained the situation and referred to staffs report and felt it was pretty straight forward. The Petitioner wished to build a home on the property and has been issued a building permit. It was placed on hold when it was discovered that the structure would encroach 26 feet into the setback from 33rd Ave. This variance is being asked for in order to be closer to 33rd Ave. The structure meets all other required .yard setbacks. The 50% rule, straight zoning and variances was discussed. Mr. Abemathy closed the Public Hearing and opened it for discussion and motion. Mr. Budd moved to approve and forward Petition VA-2002-AR-2445 to the BZA for recommendation with conditions. Seconded Mr. Mindy. Carried Unanimously 9-0. E. PUD-2002-AR-2566, Robert Muihere, representing J.E.D. of Southwest Florida, Inc., and Colony Corporate Centre, Inc. requesting an amendment to the Pelican Marsh PUD/DRI for the purpose of amending the PUD document to revise the square footage for medical offices. The property is located north of Vanderbilt Beach Road (C.IL 901) and east of Livingston Road, in Sections 25, 27, 34, 35, and 36, Township 48 South, Range 25 East and Section 31, Township 48 south, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to DOA-2002-AR-2567) Also 3 Page 3 October 3, 2002 F. DOA-X002-AR-2567, Robert Mulhere, representing J.E.D. of Soutli!st61 Florida, Inc., and Colony Corporate Centre, Inc. requesting an amendment to the Pelican Marsh DRI to increase square footage for medical office use' to 26,000 square feet and to correct a scrivener's error that occurred in 1999 which left out the phrase "office commercial use, with up to 9,000 square feet" causing a conflict between the Development Order and the PUD for property located north of Vanderbflt Beach Road (C.R. 901) and east of Livingston Road, in Sections 25, 27, 34, 35 and 36, Township 48 South, Range 25 east and Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 26 East~ Collier County, Florida. (Companion Item to PUD-2002-AR-2566) Those testifying were sworn in by Mr. Abemathy. Mr. Ray Bellows - Planning Services - This Amendment, according to report, indicated staffs opinion that the amendment would not affect any impact on. development strategy for Pelican Mash PUD or affect residential properties with- in or adjacent to the PUD. The petitioner is requesting to increase the mount of Medical Office space allowed. They now have 295,800 square feet of leasable space allocated to general office within the pelican Marsh PUD. 9,000 sq. feet of the 295,800 sq. feet is dedicated to medical office and they are asking to increase usage to 26,000 sq. feet. The Amendment will also correct an inadvertent omission of the term "office uses" from Paragraph 4 in the Findings of Fact. The language will also add "including up to 26,000 square feet". The proposed revisions do not affect the adopted level of service standards. It shifts allocations of the leaseable office floor area to a category of medical office. Providing additional parking was discussed. Ray stated general office would have less customers and different use category is based on counts. It was noted there are only two things being changed, one is to amend the PUD Document and the other the technical term. Ray talked about staff making sure everything is okay and adhered to. MR. Richardson felt the applicant had not followed the commitments he signed up for. This is a good time to clear up any language. Mr. Schmitt discussed talking with Mr. Feder, PUD's submitted by Professional Engineers and the need for validity into the reports. Mr. Fry talked about a conditional approval. Petitioner - Mr. Robert Mulhere - Consultant David Plummer and Associates. -representing the Developers - He discussed the increased parking and the increased square footage in the Medical Building. He indicated they are not increasing the overall square footage and the need for additional parking. Mr. Abemathy states that the staff's report said "the petitioner indicating that the parking probe is a separate issue and that the owner will have to provide additional parking spaces." He wanted to make sure they are not talking about Pelican Marsh, but his project. Mr. Mulhere stated he is not representing WCI. For the record they are sending in DRI and PUD reports prepared by professionals and staff. The developer has an obligation 4 Page 4 The process of providing easements was talked about. Mr. Richardson talked about potential for disconnect and discussed the traffic numbers and number of trips without any level of service standards being impacted and the comp plan providing ,5% before it affects the level of service. The staffs report states there will be minimal increase (1.2%) in daily trips generated, so no level of service standard will be affected by the amendment. Ron Talone - David Plummer & Associates - He discussed the adjacent roads with the different types of LOS in the various areas. Mr. Richardson stated he is looking at any opportunity to make sure they do not go forward and put more traffic on failed roadways, if possibly worked into the system. Mr. Mulhere talked about the number of trips and approx. 30 peak hour trips with the worse case scenario being 71/2 trips in a segment. Mr. Richardson just want to stress again to think more constructively of construction projects that put more traffic on failed roadways. Mr. Mulhere felt this was a legitimate issue and the level of service would be minimal. Mr. Abemathy wanted to know, when they do a level of service on a road, do they differentiate between Eastbound and Westbound? Mr. Mulhere answered it was done by segments. Speakers: Juan Ramirez - 866 10--5th Ave. North, Naples - He stated he lives across from Pelican Marsh. Mr. Abemathy reminded Mr. Ramirez that his house is across from Pehcan Marsh and the subject property discussed is at the comer of Airport and Vanderbilt. Mr. Ramirez stated he received a letter. Mr. Mulhere stated the letter shows the entire PUD and amending the whole PUD but only changing the Medical Office and property immediately to the west of Airport and north of Vanderbilt so will not have any bearing on his property. Mr. Ramierz would not be affected by this amendment. Peter Meyers - 23710 Walden Center Drive//205, Bonita Springs - Mr. Meyers was asking for information. Mr. Abemathy stated Mr. Meyers does not live in the area and informed him this isn't an informational meeting but a meeting for the Committee to pass on this particular petition. They will not pursue further questions. Discussion followed on monitoring reports being correct and Landscape Codes being met. Mr. Abemathy closed the Pubhc Hearing and opened it for discussion and motion. Mr. Strain moved to approve and recommend to the BCC - DOA-2002-AR- 2567. Seconded Mr. Budd. 5 Page 5 October 3, 2002 Mr. Richardson is looking forward to staffs submission on the whole issue.o~ 6 [ monitoring reports, catching problems and in favor of tightening up. Carried unanimously 9-0. ~ ' Mr. Strain moved to approve and recommend to BCC PUD/DRI-2002-AR- 2566. Seconded Mr. Budd. Carried unanimously - 9-0. 9:45 AM Break. Meeting reconvened at 9:55 AM. G.RZ-2001-AR-1649 - Robert L. Duane, of Hole Montes, Inc. representing Craig D. Timmins, Trustee, requesting a rezone from RSF-3 to C-I for property located South of Immokalee Road on the east side of Veterans Parkway, in Section 26, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Those testifying were sworn in by Mr. Abernathy. Disclosures - Mr. Strain stated he had discussions with the applicant Bob Duane and Tom Taylor. Fred Reischl - Planning Services - The petitioner wishes to rezone 3.51 acres from Residential Single-Family (RSF-3) zoning district to Commercial Professional and General Office (C-l) zoning district. Maps were shown. An 8 foot strip of property abuts Immokalee Road and then south along Veterans Park Drive becomes wider as it extends southward. The buildable portion abuts Southwind Estates subdivision and Southampton PUD. Letters had been distributed from property owners and Mr. Bruce Anderson. Mr. Reischel described surrounding areas of the subject property. All those to the West are non-residential and to the East are residential. This would be the only parcel that has access from Veterans Park Drive, along with the entrance to a North Naples Fire Station. It has been on the market to sell as Residential and was stated from the petitioner that he has been unable to sell it as such with no offers. The eastern boundary abuts a small waterway. The creek offers a natural barrier which would favor the petitioner. If the subject property were zoned Agricultural, the adjacent Homeowners might expect the property would be rezoned in the future. But being that it is zoned single family, it would be reasonable to think the property would be developed with single family homes. Staff indicates if the parcel were developed as a residential subdivision, under current zoning, it would be the only residential access off Veterans' Park Drive. Staff is recommending denial of the petition because it does not meet the criteria for approval. The unusual shape of the lot was questioned and discussed. The map was referred to. 6 Page 6 October 3, 2002 Mrs. Young asked about more detailed report on traffic density. It was brought up the hours would be regular office hours. It would generate more traffic but not exceed the threshold. Mr. Abemathy wondered if the 8 foot strip nmning up to a major medal was done with a purpose in mind. Mr. Reischel did not find a reason. PETITIONER: Mr. Bruce Anderson - Representing the Applicant -Mr. George Visnich is owner of the property. He felt staff made this rather complicated, but it was not and very straight forward for this rezoning request. PUD does allow Medical office uses and perform medical services. Circumstances have changed since Mr. Visnich bought the property because of the Counties actions. He stated that the configuration of the 8 foot strip along Immokalee Road is there because it is ~e only way to have access to the public. Mr. Visnich paid dearly for it. Mr. Visnich - owner of said property - stated the property was bought so he could take care of his Mother who was in a nursing home, but in the meantime passed away. At one time his intentions were to build a bridge across the creek. He bought the piece of property from John Pulling at $50,000. It was noted the water is a stream not a river. Mr. Andersen stated there are "rezoning conditions" they are recommending for approval. They have had two meetings with residents. He talked abut recording the deed restrictions. As part of the packet for the Committee he stated there are 6 conditions they are abiding by: 1) Building height shall be 2 stories with a maximum of 30 feet. 2) A type "D" landscape buffer, 8 feet in width, shall be indicted on the SDP. The buffer shall begin at the Immokalee River property line and continue south to the Cocohatchee River. 3) The following are not permitted uses: barbershops, beauty shops, shoe repair shops & shoeshine parlors, and individual & family social services. 4) Parking lots at the rear of structures abutting the Cocohatchee River are prohibited. 5) A type "B" landscape buffer along the Cocohachee River shall be indicted on the SDP. The buffer shall incorporate the existing native vegetation. 6) A wall shall not be required along the Cocohatchee River. (Lighting will be shielded) A map and plan were handed to the Committee. It will be made part of the record. 7 Page 7 1 October 3, 2002 Staff mentioned this is open to the BCC level. If they make the five fin~mgs listed in the Analysis, the petition would be consistent with the Growth Management Plan and the Board could approve it. SPEAKERS: Kris Gomory- 1920 Bethany Place-Southwind Estates -Kris talked about the pond or stream - it doesn't flow, only when it rains. He is concerned about drainage easements and setbacks. His main issue is the drainage. There is no rip-rap and is a major concern. He is concerned about flooding, nm off and flooding properties to the back. Also changing to C-1 would affect their property values. He also didn't know what the enforceability of the deed restrictions are with the County. He didn't feel the residents had any control as was stated earlier. Another issue is that they want to work with everyone but do not want to see their property values go down. His concern is with the 25 foot height of the building. It would be looking down at his property, and now sees it is 30 feet high. Mr. Strain & Mr. Mindy asked about different access roads and Kris discussed and referred to the map on Bethany Place and Veterans' Park Drive. Mr. Abemathy asked about one story buildings. Kris stated at one of the meetings they were showed a rendering of nice one story buildings with nice landscaping. Margie Welch - 1904 Bethany Place -Southwind Estates - She showed where her property is located and how they built an expensive home and enjoy the privacy and quietness o the area. She gave a history of the properties and the county creating Veterans Road Park and trying to £md the owner of said property. It was researched and the Realtor could not find who the owner was. She also checked into who would be responsible for cleaning the creek. She stated the County would clean it out if they had permission by all land owners. (Water Management). Since they did not have Mr. Visnich's permission, they would not clean it. Her main concern is "noise". She's not against the Park because she has children and knows the parks are important. There were medical building put up across Veterans Highway and they were never notified. Then a Fire Station was built on Veterans Park and goes past her master bedroom with sirens blowing. They were told at that time they would not mm on their sirens until they reached Immokalee Road, but does not happen every time. She talked about traffic concerns and the gopher turtles. She finds this all very unacceptable but would not be opposed to a one story building. She summarized it by saying her main concerns are height and traffic. The residents saw drawings of one story buildings at meetings by the petitioner and the residents. They were not conducted by County staff. Mr. Ray Bellows reminded everyone the C-1 can be built to a maximum of 35 feet. Terry Jolly - 1916 Bethany Place-Southwind Estates -Her home would face the back of the buildings. She is concerned about the living conditions and being an 8 Page 8 October 3 2002 office building looking at Residential homes. She also had concerns about the traffic and mount of trips per day. Lighting was discussed .along with property values going down., She felt the landscaping should be left along the creek. She talked about one story compared to the two story buildings with lighting being a real problem. Mr. Abernathy stated there can be 3 units per acre. He asked how they would like to have 10 residents jammed into that area. Those residents are there 24 hours while in office buildings, people are only on the premises until 5:00 PM. They could also build anywhere fi.om 10-35 feet homes. Joe Schmitt stated low density could be pursued and there could be a 35 foot building with 14 units per acre. (Multi-family rezoning). James Welch - 1904 Bethany Plaee-Southwinds Estates -One concern is the lighting on a 30 foot building. He had a plat that he showed everyone. He discussed the prixiate property, the bridge and park. The plat will be copied as part of the record. David Sugrue -1928 Bethany Place - Southwinds Estates - He told everYone he works the midnight shifts so would be sleeping during the day. His bedroom would face that piece of commercial property consequently one of his concerns also. Mr. Abernathy is interested in the storm water nm off. Mrs. Young had environmental concerns about reviewing the gopher tortoises and how it all figures into the staffs plans. Mr. Reischel commented that an Environmental Impact Statement was not required as the property did not meet the size threshold. Mrs. Young then brought up the flooding and drainage issue. Mr. Reischel responded that this is a straight re-zoning and because it doesn't have specifics as a PUD, those things are deferred until the SDP - then if Wetlands on site, they would have to meet South Florida rules and the specifics of the engineering but don't have to be addressed at this time. They would have to meet South Florida criteria at time of construction. Mr. Fry discussed units per acre, multi-family zoning, changing the zoning, and if not approved, worse case scenario for the residents could be "several" single family homes 35 feet in height. It was noted that Habitat for Humanity could purchase the property and meet the criteria. Discussion followed on what other types of construction could purchase the property. Tom Taylor - A purchaser of the Property -He referred to the access map and discussed the concerns of the neighbors. He felt they have addressed all their issues and concerns and are meeting all standards. They submitted applications, public notices and held neighborhood meetings. The things they heard today are the same concerns the neighbors had at the meetings and they have attempted to address them all. They would meet any criteria for drainage and as far as the lighting issue is concerned, they did a study on the tree canopy heights and found some of the pines were 50-55 feet high. They also addressed timing of the lights, and would look at the security issue also. 9 Page 9 October 3, 2002 161 Mr. Mindy asked about the drainage problem. Mr. Taylor talked about swale retention. It was stated the rendering was laid out for 1 story buildings but are building 2 story buildings. Parking and drainage was again discussed. Mr. Duane stated they are willing to meet all the rezoning conditions. Mr. Strain asked if they would object to one story buildings, and the answer was "yes' they want to proceed with 2 stories. Mr. Abemathy closed the Public Hearing for discussion and motion. Mr. Richardson moved to support the planning staffs' recommendation of denial of this petition RZ-2001-AR-1649 and report to the BCC on that basis and leave it Single Family Residential. Seconded Mr. Fry. Discussion followed and Mr. Budd agrees with the previous comments concerning the buffers and densities that the neighbors may not want because other entities and other uses that would not be favorable to the neighborhoods. If this motion fails a single stipulation added to the stipulations already agreed to by the petitioner would make it the best possible compromise. Mr. Abernathy feels the Residential Zoning on this parcel has come and gone. He didn't feel the traffic is an issue at all. He can not support the present motion. Mrs. Young cannot support the present motion either and feels the needs and desires of both sides could be met and if allowed she would support a motion for the one story business change. Vote was taken - 3-Yes (Mr. Fry, Mr. Mindy, Mr. Richardson) 6 -No - Motion denied. Mr. Strain moved to go forward with the recommendation for approval on RZ- 2001-AR-1649 with rezoning stipulations presented by staff with correction that 2 story buildings be 1 story. Seconded Mr. Mindy. Motion Carried unanimously - 9-0. e OLD BUSINESS: Mr. Fry received a notice about a meeting in Key West and wondered about expenses paid by the County. Mr. Schmitt will address these issues on the next agenda - such as whose budget it comes under and the procedures that need to be followed etc. The Urban Land Meeting was cancelled on October 10, 2002. 10. NEW BUSINESS: Mr. Abemathy wanted to comment on a thought he had about being the "Counties Planning Agency". He wasn't sure they had ever initiated anything in a positive way. They react to what staffputs before them. Mr. Richardson has, on several occasions, brought up different issues for the LDC, but never said "this is what I want staff to consider". He is not sure whether staffwould do that, or a motion is needed from the whole commission but this is something he has thought about when they discussed the issue of Vanderbilt Beach being a condo or a hotel. He was concerned about legal issues. He proceeded to discuss some of those issues. 10 Page 10 October 3, 2002 4161 Staff will come back and define that issue. Marjorie stated they can move to direct smffto investigate and bring back on the~ agenda and can be a workshop item. Mr. Abemathy asked if the Development Services Board generate requests on changes. He feels that if they would point out a change or conflict that it should be nm past the Planning Commission before it becomes an LDC Amendment. He felt it should be looked at by them before it gets into the packet ofLDC Amendments. The subject was discussed on staff's agreeing to certain things and Procedures that are followed. 98% of LDC amendments are staff generated. Being no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 12:10 PM. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COlVIlVIISSION 1 KENNETH L. ABERNATHY, CHAIRMAN 11 Page 11 16K4 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFIC AS OF MAY 20, 2003 16K5 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFIC AS OF MAY 20, 2003 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: 17D X Normal legal Advertisement (Display Adv., location, etc.) [] Other: Originating Dept/Div: Road Maintenance-Landscape Maintenance Person: Bob Petersen Date: 10/31/02 Petition No. (If none, give brief description: Amend Ordinance No. - 96-84 - Radio Road MSTU Petitioner: (Name & Address): N/A Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before X BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appearing ys before ber 19, 2002) Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): X Naples Daily News [] Other [] Legally Required PROPOSED TEXT: (INCLUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION & COMMON LOCATION & SIZE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 96-84 WHICH CREATED THE RADIO ROAD BEAUTFICATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION THREE TO EXPAND THE PURPOSE TO INCLUDE THE COST FOR CURBING, WATERING FACILITIES, PLANTINGS AND MAINTEANNCE OF THE MEDIAN AREAS OF ANY PUBLIC ROADWAY ADJOINING RADIO ROAD WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE UNIT; PROVIDING FOR INCLUDISON IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? X Yes Fund 150fi~162545- Revie~w/4bY:/] - · 'si?Administrator or Designee Date / / ./ . List ~/ttachments: Ordinance No. 2002- [] No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS Ao For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to Clerk's Office [] Requesting Division [] Original B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: Date of Public hearing: Date Advertised: t70 ORDINANCE NO. 2002- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 96-84 WHICH CREATED THE RADIO ROAD BEAUTIFICATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION THREE TO EXPAND THE PURPOSE TO INCLUDE THE COST FOR CURBING, WATERING FACILITIES, PLANTINGS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE MEDIAN AREAS OF ANY PUBLIC ROADWAY ADJOINING RADIO ROAD WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE UNIT; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1711 WHEREAS, on December 17, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 96-84 which created the Radio Road Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit CMSTU"); and WHEREAS, on September 17, 2002, the Radio Road Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit Advisory Board voted to include the cost of maintenance of the medians on Devonshire Boulevard in the fiscal year '92/'93 budget; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to change the Ordinance to allow median and right-of-way work on Radio Road and any adjoining public road within the MSTU boundaries. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SECTION THREE OF ORDINANCE NO. 1996-84. Section Three is amended to read as follows: SECTION THREE: PURPOSE AND GOVERNING BODY. The MSTU is created for the purpose of providing curbing, watering facilities, plantings and maintenance of the median areas for that portion of Radio Road lying between Airport- Pulling Road (County Road 31) and Santa Barbara Boulevard and for any adjoining public road within the MSTU boundaries. The governing body of the MSTU shall be the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. SECTION TWO: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or 1 Words Underlined are added; Words ~*~.~- ~v~. ..... h ............. ~, are deleted. re-lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," or any other appropriate word. SECTION THREE: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ,2002. DATED: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:. JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney h: HFA\OrdXAmendRadioRdlBeautification96_ 84 2 Words Underlined are added; Words Str'.:c~z Through are deleted. November 4, 2002 Georgia Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: AMEND ORDINANCE #96-84; RADIO ROAD MSTU Dear Georgia: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Friday, November 8, 2002, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk P.O./Account # 150-162545-649100 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, November 19, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 96-84 WHICH CREATED THE RADIO ROAD BEAUTIFICATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT; PROVINDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION THREE TO EXPAND THE PURPOSE TO INCLUDE THE COST FOR CURBING, WATERING FACILITIES, PLANTINGS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE MEDIAN AREAS OF ANY PUBLIC ROADWAY ADJOINING RADIO ROAD WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE UNIT; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 17D JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Teri Michaels To: Subject: thanks! legals@naplesnews.com ATTN: GEORGIA AMEND ORDINANCE 96-84 171] "~ AMEND ORD.96-84.doc AMEND ORD.96-84.doc Teri Michaels From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@clerk.collier.fi.us Monday, November 04, 2002 11:10 AM Ted Michaels Delivery Status Notification (Relay) A~q-97022.txt I A'I-rN: GEORGIA ~MEND ORDINANC..This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals~naplesnews.com Teri Michaels From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Monday, November 04, 2002 11:06 AM Teri Michaels Delivered: ATTN: GEORGIA AMEND ORDINANCE 96-84 170 I ATFN: GEORGIA tMEND ORDINANC,. ~ATTN: GEOP,~,TA AMEND ORbT. NANCE 96-84>> Your message To: legols~naplesnews.com Subject: ATTN: GEORGT. A AMEND ORb'rNANCE 96-84 Sent: Man, 4 Nov 2002 1!:09:4! -0500 was delivered to the following recipient(s): legals on Man, 4 Nov 2002 11:05:36 -0500 t-~ ^ ^ 1'13 Z 0 o v v ^ ^ I'n Z C~ 0 o v v Naples DaiLy News , Naples, FL 34102 Alfidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHERI LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 3410'i-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 150162545649 58551471 NOTICE OF INTENT TO State of FLorida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that d~e said Naples Daily News is a newupeper published at Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper ha~ heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, FLorida, each day and has been entered aB second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; ~nd affian~ further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose o'~ securing this advertisement for pubLiction in ti~e said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 1'1/08 AD SPACE: 133.000 INCH FILED ON: 11/08/02 r 17D NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice Is hereby given that on Tuesday, No- vember 19, 2002/In the ae~rdronm. 3rd Floor, Admlnlstrddo~ Building, Collier Cour~ Gov. ernment Center, 3301 East Tamlaml Trall~ N~Ples, Florl .da, the missioners will c~nsld- er the enactment of o Courtly Ordinance. The meeting will com- mence ~ 9'.00 A.M. The title of the oll~3~llo3eedows: Ordinance. · IsPru°; ANI ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCEi NO. 96-84 WHICH CRE-I ATED THE RADIO/ ROAD BEAUTIFICATION[ MUNICIPAL SERVICE1 TAXING UNIT; PRO-I VINDING FORI AMENDMENT TO SE.C.-I TO INCLUDE THEI COST FOR __C_U..~_LN~,/ NL~INTENANCE THE MEDIAN AREAS1 OF ANY PUBLIC ROADWAY ADJOINING RADIO ROAD' WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF! THE UNIT; PROVIDtNGI FOR INCLUSION IN THE! CODE OF LAWS ANDi ORDINANCES; PROVID-I lNG FOR CONFLICT1 AND SEVERABILITY;I AND PROVIDING FORI AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Copies of the propasedI Ordinance are on fllel ~ the Clerk to thel Board and are available[ for lnspec~l_on. All. Inter:J ested parties ore mvlteal to attend and be heard. openda Item must regis- ter with the County ad- 4mlnlstrator prior to pre- ~tutlon of the agenda ~tem to be addressed. ~vlduol speakers will be limited to $ minutes on any Item. The selec- tion of ~n Indlvldual sponk on befmlf of { org~nlzoflon or group encouraged. It reco nlzed by the Chalrma o spakesperson for group or orgonlzoflo~ may be alloffedl0 mln utes fo spook on a~ Item. Persons wishing to hove wrlffen or grophlc ma-I terlals included In the[ Bourd ogenda packefsl must submit sold rnuter-I Iai a minimum of 3l weeks prior to the re-/ spectlve public .heoring.| I~ ally case~ written ma-I terlols Intended to considered by the Beard shoil be submlffed to the opproprlofe Coun. fy' stuff a ml.nlmum ol seven days prior to the public hearing. All ma. terlal used In presonta. flons before the Boarc will become a perma-I nent part of the record. Any perspn wh.o .d.ecldes,I to ODDeal a aeCiSlOll o! the ~ard wm need record of the prncee~.-/ Ings pertaining thereto and therefore, may/ need to ensure that a/ verbatim record of the/ · record ~n.c~uee. s the tostlmony ~e ew-i dance upon which the epae~l Is bused ~OARD O~ COU"~Y CO~,~SS~ONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 5 9 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 96-84 WHICH CREATED THE RADIO ROAD BEAUTIFICATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION THREE TO EXPAND THE PURPOSE TO INCLUDE THE COST FOR CURBING, WATERING FACILITIES, PLANTINGS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE MEDIAN AREAS OF ANY PUBLIC ROADWAY ADJOINING RADIO ROAD WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE UNIT; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on December 17, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 96-84 which created the Radio Road Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit CMSTU"); and WHEREAS, on September 17, 2002, the Radio Road Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit Advisory Board voted to include the cost of maintenance of the medians on Devonshire Boulevard in the fiscal year '92/'93 budget; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to change the Ordinance to allow median and right-of-way work on Radio Road and any adjoining public road within the MSTU boundaries. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SECTION THREE OF ORDINANCE NO. 1996-84. Section Three is amended to read as follows: SECTION THREE: PURPOSE AND GOVERNING BODY. The MSTU is created for the purpose of providing curbing, watering facilities, plantings and maintenance of the median areas for that portion of Radio Road lying between Airport- Pulling Road (County Road 31) and Santa Barbara Boulevard and for any adjoining public road within the MSTU boundaries. The governing body of the MSTU shall be the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. SECTION TWO: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or 1 Words Underlined are added; Words e ..... ~r ~-~. ..... ~. ............. e,- are deleted. re-lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," or any other appropriate word. SECTION THREE: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED County,, Florida, this .,,' .~.'~ ~',.l?~ % AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier i q44~ day of No,emir, 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: JAI~E~ N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN I I-lq-0z Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney h:HFA\OrdXAmendRadioRdlBeautification96-84 2 Words Underlined are added; Words Struc~c Through are deleted. 17D ' STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2002-59 .Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 19th day of November, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 20th day of November, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex-officio to~.Board of County .Co~~ne r s '~'~ ~"~ ~'"*~ I ~ ~'" ' '