The URL can be used to link to this page

Documents 10/08/2002 RBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 8, 2002 Sent by: Konica Fax 9825 9412634864 ; 10/18/02 10:25; #856; Page 6/10 NapLes DoiLy Ne~s NapLes, FL 34102 BO~RDOF [O~MTY CO~q3$$JO~R$ CHER/ LEFA~A PO BOX 413016 I~PLES FL REFERENCE: 001230 20021] County et CoLLier e~er~ B. ~b, ~ on oath says that she serves ~ity ~s, · Oeity ~r ~tis~ ~ ~tes, in CoLLier Co~ty, FLorida: that the ~ ~Teo tiat~. A~ftont furtheP say~ that the ~a~d N~Le~ D6ity CoLLier C~nty, Ftori~, ~ that t~ said ~a~per has heretofore been contin~mLy ~Lish~ tn ~td ~k:~er C~ty, F:orl~, ~ch ~ ofldha~ b~n e~er~ ~e~o~ class ~[[ier C~nty, F[ori~, foe a peri~ ef I yea~ ~ext pr~i~ the first publication of att~ G~y Of ~vertis~ent; ~d further ~ay~ that ~ ha~ nei~ee ~iu nor pr~i~ any person, fire or cor~rati~ any ~r~me 0t ae~ring this advertisement tar ~[igti~ in the aaid newa~per. AD SPACE: PILED oN: 10/07/02 Signature of Affiant /4~ - COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA October 8, 2002 9:00 a.m. NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISI-HNG TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 99-22 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS PERMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY 1 October 8, 2002 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (239) 774-8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. Pastor Josh Perez, New Hope Ministries ® 1, ® AGENDA AND MINUTES A® Approval of today's regular, consent and summary agenda as amended. (Ex Pane Disclosure provided by Commission members for summary agenda.) Approved and/or Adopted with changes- 5/0 Be C. D. E. F. G. September 5, 2002 -Landscape Workshop September 5, 2002 - Special-Budget Hearing September 6, 2002 - GIS Workshop September 9, 2002 - Special-Pelican Bay Meeting September 10, 2002 - Regular Meeting September 17, 2002 - Impact Fee Workshop Approved as Presented - 5/0 SERVICE AWARDS PROCLAMATIONS A® Be Proclamation for Weed and Seed Program in Immokalee. To be accepted by Will Daniels, U.S. Department of Justice-Tampa District; Sheriff Don Hunter; Commissioner James N. Coletta; Terrance Sumter, Resident Te'rrie Aviles, Temporary Chairperson-Executive Committee/Seeding Chair Lieutenant Mark Baker, Temporary Vice-Chairperson-Executive Committee/Weeding Chair Corporal Martha Bucholtz, Temporary Secretary-Executive Committee. Adopted - 5/0 Proclamation for Naples Players Day. To be accepted by Dolores Gamble, John Sorey, President, Jim Rideoutte, Executive Director and Ted Tobye, 2 October 8, 2002 e Ce De E® Fe Ge Chairman on the 50th Anniversary Committee. Adopted - 5/0 Proclamation for Lights on After School. To be accepted by Susan Luenberger, President and Linda Flewelling, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Community Foundation. Adopted - 5/0 Proclamation to recognize October as National Arts and Humanities Month in Collier County. To be accepted by Joy Lelonek, Executive Director of the United Arts Council; William R. O'Neill, President and George Lange, Chairman of Collier County Cultural Plan. Adopted - 5/0 Proclamation to recOgnize October as Brain Injury Awareness Month. To be accepted by Lisa A. Phipps. Adopted - 5/0 Proclamation to designate October 6 - 12, 2002 as National 4-H Week. To be accepted by Brooke Haas, County Council President. Adopted- 5/0 Proclamation to recognize October 8, 2002 as NAACP Freedom Fund Day. To be accepted by LaVerne Franklin, President of the NAACP, Collier County Branch. Adopted - 5/0 PRESENTATIONS ge PUBLIC PETITIONS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Att Petition ST-2194 continued from the September 10, 2002 BCC Meeting. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition ST-2194,. Michael Landy, P.E., of Landy Engineering, Inc., representing a Southwest Florida Oppommity Fund, L.L.C., requesting a Special Treatment Development Permit to construct a 11,200 square foot drug store and a 266-seat restaurant via the 3 October 8, 2002 B® Ce De site development plan approval process on a 4.02 Acre Site Zoned C-3ST, located at the Northeast comer of the intersection of US-41 and CR-951 in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Resolution 2002-422 - Adopted 5/0 This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition PUDA-02- AR-2098, Mr. Robert L. Duanc, AICP, of Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc., representing Benderson Development Company, requesting a rezone from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development known as Lawmetka Plaza for property located on the Northwest comer of Wiggins Pass Road (CR 888) and US-41, in Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 34 acres. Ordinance 2002-51 ' Adopted 5/0 To obtain Board approval of local amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code by adoPting an Ordinance and directing staff to complete the process to make the amendments effective. Ordinance 2002-49 - Adopted 5/0 Amendment to the Emergency Management Ordinance expanding the succession of authority to include all County Commissioners, the County Clerk of Courts and the Deputy County Manager. Ordinance 2002-50 - Adopted 5/0 Withdrawn E. Petition PUD-2001-AR-1404 I)wight Nadeau of RWA Inc., representing Conquest Development USA, L.C., requesting an amendment to the Silver Lakes PUD to allow modification to the Land Use Distribution Table of the PUD. The subject property is located on the East side of Collier Boulevard approximately one and three quarter miles South of Tamiami Trail East.and Collier Boulevard Intersection in Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. This property consists of 146 acres. To approve County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Section 66-116, as amended by the County Attorney, creating stricter enforcement of Public Swimming Pools currently under Florida Statutes. Continued and to be brought back with a redesigned program - 5/0 4 October 8, 2002 ® 10. Ge Adoption of a Resolution amending the Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule, which is Schedule One of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Law and Ordinances, the same being the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance. Resolution 2002-423 - Adopted w/changes - 5/0 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Appointment of member to the Affordable Housing Commission. Resolution 2002-424 appointing David Ellis - Adopted 5/0 B. Appointment of member to the Workforce Housing Advisory Committee. Resolution 2002-425 appointing Esmeralda Serrata - Adopted 5/0 CJ Appointment of member to the Historical/Archaeological Preservation Board. Resolution 2002-426 appointing Thomas Franchino - Adopted 5/0 De E® Appointment of members to the Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee. Resolution 2002-427 appointing Ron Torp and Robert Slebodnik- Adopted 5/0 Resolution opposing the Acquisition of the Marco Island/Marco Shores Utility System by the Florida Water Services Authority. (Commissioner Fiala) Resolution 2002-428 - Adopted 5/0 COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT A® Staff request the Collier County Board of County Commissioners' discuss, at a Public Hearing, the proposed contents of an Ordinance providing for the acquisition of environmentally sensitive lands and indicate to staff whether to prepare the Ordinance for advertising and adoption upon the passage of the November 5, 2002 General Election Ballot. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Adrn/nistrator, Community Development) Staff to prepare ordinance if the November Referendum ballot question passes - 4/0 (Commissioner Henning out) Be Recommendation to approve a Resolution superseding Resolution No. 01- 410 establishing the Schedule of User Fees for Ground and Air Ambulance 5 October 8, 2002 Ce Transport and Related Services. (John Dunnuck, Administrator, Public Services) Resolution 2002429 - Adopted with change regarding one year waiver 4/0 (Commissioner Itenning out) Adopt a Resolution establishing and implementing beach parking fees and rules and repealing Resolution No. 99-240. (John Dunnuck, Administrator, Public Services) Resolution 2002430 - Adopted 4/0 (Commissioner Itenning out) Continued to October 22, 2002 D. This item continued from the September 24~ 2002 BCC Agenda. Approve amended Median Landscaping Agreement between Collier County and the Vineyards Development Corporation in the amount of $80,000. (Norman Feder, Administrator, Transportation Services) Added E. 11. 12. Approve Budget Amendment for Wiggins Pass emergency maintenance dredging engineering services in the amount of $10,000. (Staff Request) Approved - 5/0 PUBLIC COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS A. Mr. Kramer requesting a debate against Frank Halas. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT A. Request of the County Attorney that the Board of County Commissioners enter into a Closed Attorney-Client Executive Session pursuant to Section 286.011(8), Fla. Stat., at the October 22, 2002 regularly scheduled Board of County Commissioners Meeting for purposes of advice/discussing Settlement Negotiations and Strategy related to Litigation Expenditures in Aquaport v. Collier County, Case No. 2:01-CV-341-FTM-29DNF, now pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Approved 5/0 Resolution authorizing Commission District Newsletters, Informative Notices, Mailers or Other Informational Sites or Transmittals. Resolution 2002-431 - Adopted 4ll (Commissioner Henning opposed) 6 October 8, 2002 13. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 14. 15. AIRPORT AUTHORITY STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS A. Staff directed to Implement and collect School Impact Fees re Homewood Estate and Bentley Village. - 5/0 B. Discussion regarding water quality of Vanderbilt Bay C. Staff directed to work with Mosquito Control to incorporate Golden Gate Estates and Immokalee into the District. 16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. Approved and/or Adopted with changes - 5/0 A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approve 2003 Tourism Agreement with Marco Island Historical Society for Tourist DevOopment Special Museum Grant of $25,000. ® Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of"Stonebridge Unit Four". Resolution 2002-420 e Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for "Stonebridge Unit Five". Resolution 2002-421 m Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforeement Board Case No. 2002-198 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Palm River Estates regarding violation of Ordinances No. 99-51 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 7 October 8, 2002 ® e ® 0 ® 10. 11. Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2002-199 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Palm River Estates regarding violation of Ordinances No. 99-51 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2001-045 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Patrick and Erin Rose regarding violation to Ordinance No. 91-102, Sections 3.9.3 as amended of the Collier County Land Development Code. Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2000-035 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. I.E.C. Rentals, Inc. and Ivy Jean Nebus regarding violation to Ordinance No. 91-102, Sections 1.5.6,2.1.11,2.1.15,2.2.16.2.1,3.3.9, as amended of the Collier County Land Development Code and Ordinance No. 99-51, Sections 6,7,8,9 of the Collier County Weeds and Litter Ordinance. Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2002-200 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Palm River Estates regarding violation of Ordinances No. 99-51 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2002-175 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Palm River Estates regarding violation of Ordinances No. 99-51 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2002-181 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Palm River Estates regarding violation of Ordinances No. 99-51 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2002-182 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Palm River Estates regarding violation of Ordinances No. 99-51 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 8 October 8, 2002 12. 13. Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2002-196 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Palm River Estates regarding violation of Ordinances No. 99-51 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Approval of the Satisfaction of Lien for Code Enforcement Board Case No. 2002-197 styled Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida vs. Palm River Estates regarding violation of Ordinances No. 99-51 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 14. Approve renewing temporary parking and staging area easements between CPOC Development Company, L.L.C., and Collier County for one year's continued use of land located South of Development Services during construction of the parking deck, at a cost not to exceed $53,549. Be TRANSPORTATION SERVICES Request that the Board of County Commissioners approve Work Order #CT-02-02 to Chris-Tel Company in the amount of $51,750.00 for the construction of the median landscape planter on the Haldeman Creek Bridge on Bayshore Drive. e Approve Selection Committee ranking of three firms for contract negotiations for RFP 02-3398 "Professional Design and Related Services for Collier Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road", Projoct No. 65061. Staff to begin negotiations with CH2MhilI, Agnoli, Barber & Brundage and Boyle Engineering Continued to October 22,2002 - 3. Board approval to utilize insurance proceeds to purchase two reconditioned transit buses and other support equipment in an amount not to exceed $91,853. Ce PUBLIC UTILITIES 1. Accept Water and Sewer Utilities provided in accordance with Developer Contribution Agreement with LB/P Groveway, LLC in thc 9 October 8, 2002 De ge Fe Ge He J® amount of $223,496.25. PUBLIC SERVICES 1. Approve an Agreement with the District School Board of Collier County for transporting school age Summer Camp Participants at an estimated cost of $60,000. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1. To authorize staff to reject Bid #02-3410 "Purchase of Limerock and Fill Materials". 2. Approval to pUrchase Property, Casualty and Workers' Compensation Insurance and related services for FY2003. EMERGENCY SERVICES COUNTY MANAGER AIRPORT AUTHORITY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1. Commissioners' request for approval for payment to attend functions serving a valid public purpose. Commissioner Coletta$o be reimbursed $20; and Commissioner Carter to be reimbursed $18.95 MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 1. Miscellaneous Items to be Filed for Record as Directed. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 1. That the Board of County Commissioners make a determination of whether the purchases of goods and services docum6nted in the Detailed Report of Open Purchase Orders serve'a valid public purpose and authorize the expenditure of County funds to satisfy said 10 October 8, 2002 Purchases. 17. L. COUNTY ATTORNEY Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the Easement Acquisition of Parcel 182 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. Lazaro Herrera, et al, Case No. 02-2211-CA (Immokalee Road Project #60018). Staff to deposit $700 into the Registry of the Court Recommendation that the Board pay the reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred by two (2) County employees in connection with the March 7, 1999 Sulfuric Acid Spill at the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant as they have successfully completed pretrial diversion and the charges against them have been dismissed and that the Board approve any necessary Budget Amendment. Fees in the amounts of $9,749.20 for Barry Erickson; and $2,049.00 for Robert Wheeler e Approve the Agreed Order awarding Supplemental Attorney's Fees relative to Easement Acquisitions of Parcels 170 and 770 in the Lawsuit entitled Collier County v. Fred R. Sutherland, individually and D/B/A Sutherland Paint Horses, et al, Case No. 01-0756-CA (Livingston Road Project No. 60071) in the amount of $273.00. ® Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the Easement Acquisition of Parcel 175B in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. Michael $. Combs, et al,, Case No. 02-2315-CA (Immokalee Road Project #60018). Staff to d. eposit $800 into the Registry of the Court Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the Acquisition of Parcel 210 in the Lawsuit entitled Collier County v. Efrain Arce, et al, (Immokalee Phase 1 Project). Staff to deposit $8,200 into the Registry of the Court SUMMARY AGENDA - THIS SECTION IS FOR ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1) A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2) UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OR OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OF 11 October 8, 2002 ALL MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3) NO WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE ITEM RECEIVED BY STAFF, THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE BCC MEETING ON WHICH THE ITEMS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD; AND 4) NO INDIVIDUALS ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE ITEM. SHOULD ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS BE MOVED TO THE REGULAR AGENDA ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST BE SWORN IN. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition PUDA-2002- AR-2559, Dwight Nadeau of RWA Inc., representing Richard Davenport, requesting an amendment to the "Hibiscus Village" Planned Unit Development (PUD), for the purpose of revising Table I, Residential Development Standards to add lot area and width standards for the multi- family land usc in order to facilitate the opportunity to subdivide thc multi- family tract associated with the attached townhousc residences for fec simple conveyance for property located on the West side of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and approximately one and a quarter miles South of Immokalec Road (CR 846) in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Ordinance 2002-46 Be Ce This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition PUDZ-01-AR- 1331, R. Bruce Anderson of Young, VanAssenderp, Vamadoe and Anderson and Wayne Arnold of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, representing Martin Adler, requesting a rezone from "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as the ASGM Business Center PUD allowing a business park for property located on the East side of Collier. Boulevard (CR 951) and approximately one-half mile South of Tamiami Trail (US 41) in Section 10, Township 41 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Ordinance 2002-47 with stipulation This item requires that all participants be sworn in, and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. An Ordinance amending Ordinance 02-35 ~to correct a Scrivcner's Error in Section 3.5 - Development Standards of the Winding Cypress PUD that is located on thc 12 October 8, 2002 East side of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Sections 26 and 35, Township 50 South, Range 26 East and Sections 2 and 3; Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Ordinance 2002-48 18. ADJOURN IN_.~._QUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE B.B_0_OARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 774-8383. 13 October 8, 2002 AGENDA CHANGES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETING October 8, 2002 Withdraw Item 8E: Petition PUD-2001-AR-1404 Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc., representing Conquest Development USA, L.C., requesting an amendment to the Silver Lakes PUD to allow modification to the Land Use Distribution Table of the PUD. The subject property is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard approximately one and three quarter miles south of Tamiami Trail East and Collier Boulevard intersection in Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. This property consists of 146 acres. (Petitioner request.) Continue Item 10 D to the October 22, 2002 BCC Meetin.q.' Approve Median Landscaping Agreement between Collier County and the Development Corporation in the amount of $80,000. (Staff's request.) amended Vineyards Add Item 10E: Approve budget amendment for Wiggins Pass emergency maintenance dredging engineering services in the amount of $10,000. (Staff request.) Continue Item 16(B) 3 to the October 22, 2002 BCC Meetinq' Board approval to utilize insurance proceeds to purchase two reconditioned transit buses and other support equipment in an amount not to exceed $91,853. (Staff request.) Move Item 17 B to 8 H: This item requires that all participants be sworn in ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members Petition PUDZ-01-AR- 1331, R. Bruce Anderson of Young, VanAssenderp, Varnadoe and Anderson and Wayne Arnold of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, representing Martin Adler, requesting a rezone from "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as the ASGM Business Center PUD allowing a business park for property located on the East side of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and approximately one-half mile South of Tamiami Trail (US 41) in Section 10, Township 41 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Commissioner Fiala) NOTE: The followinq must be read into the record to correct the Executiw Summary for item 17B: Planning Services Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Petition PUDZ-01-AR-1331 subject to the stipulations contained in the PUD document and as otherwise described by the Ordinance of Adoption and Exhibits thereto. Note: Item 16 B 16 Continued from the September 24, 2002 BCC Meetinq and i~ further continued to the October 22, 2002 BCC Meetin.q: Approve Change Order with APAC, Inc. for roadway improvements on the North 11th Street Extension Project at the Intersection of State Road 29 in the amount of $31,733.60, Project #62021. ~/HER~$, NOW PROCLA44A TION the United State~ Del~rtment of ~Tustice ha$ mcognized the Immokalee Communi~ ~s ~n off/cid Weed ~nd ~ed ~ite: ~nd, O~r~tion ~d ~nd ~d is o n~tionol p~9~m thigh th~ UnH~d ~dd~ss~$ four cWdcol ~l~m~ts: I~w ~nfo~m~nt, communi~ O~rotion ~d ~nd ~d ~m~w~ms communi~ ~ddents id~ntifyi~ ~nd solvi~ p~bl~m$ in th~im n~ighborhood: ond, d~ u$~ f~m s~lect~d ndghborhoods ond m h~lp p~wnt crim~ from r~occu~in9 by '~di~" thos~ sit~s with ~ wid~ wri~ of o~d, ~tch P~m$, and Polic~ A~tiviti~s L~gu~s in Xmmok~l~; and, Op~don ~d ~nd ~d translates ndghboehood n~ds comp~h~nsiw ~iw-y~ strategic plan; ~nd, th~ st~t~ o~ ~d and ~d hop~s m ' the and ,~ed Coalition o/der of stretts and the and Seed received of Collier additional Bed projects in 8~ ZOO2 as 14leed DONE AND ORDER~=D TH_~$ 8th Day of October, 2002. PI~O~LAtAA TXON ~ ~VI4EI~A$, The Naples Players, Xnc. was £ounded in ~9~$; and. the current ~002-2005 schedule o£ plays represents/ts Fi£tieth Anniversary season; and, over those f/fly years with the support of the Cailler Counly Commun/ly The Nap/es Players has ~trown From one yearly per£ormance at a high school auditorium to over 160 per£ormances on two sta~.tes at/ts home, The Sudden ~ommun/ty Theatre; and, ~VIqEREA$, The Naples Players affirms/ts m/ss/on of pray/ding h/Eh quality live volunteer, amateur ~VblEgGA$, on begin a series rversary, NOI, V be it day DONE AND COtAt~X$$XONEI~$ PLOI~DA A ~I'E$ T: PI~OCLAMA T~ON the citizens of Cailler County stand firmly committed to quality a£terschool programs because they p~ovide a safe, friendly learning environment £or our kids that boosts their academic achievement; support workin9 families by ensurin9 that their children are safe and productive after the regular school day ~nds; build s~rong~r communiH~s by involvin9 our s~ud~n?s, por~n~s, business Moders nad oduH volunteers in ?h~ Iiws of our youn9 p~opM; and ~ncourog~ families m b~com~ mor~ ~ffecHw por~n~es in ~h~ir childr~n~ ~ducoHon; and, WHEREAS, The Community Foundation of Collier County has p~ovided significant leadership in the area of community involvement in the education and well-bein9 of our youth, 9rounded in the principle that quality afterschool programs are a critical link to helping our children V,'HEREA$, quality. :~ aHerschool progran~ ~ familt~ and their:communities. NOW ?i~ it where?the lights ar~ ..,- com~nt~ acHViH~ ~ ~ha~ en~ur~ .~:~ha~ are the ..day ends?: DONE AND 'Lights of afterschool programs On Oc tober loth,, promO~eg !the!crt't/ca! importance o£ their day to place county commits our and when COMM.~.G$_rONE~.G WHER~A$~ P R O C L A IIII A T Z O N the month o£ October is recognixed as;National A~ts and 14umanities Month by rh~sond$ o[ o~s ond cu]~] o~onizorions, commonHi~, Cong~ss for s~w~l y~re; on~ ar'ts nad humanities enhance and enrich the/ives of eve~/ American and embody much of the accumulated wisdom, intellect, and imaginatian of humankind/and, F/t-IEREA$, help close the achievement 9ap, especially aman9 disadvantaged youth; the arts improve the academic skills essential for readin9 and language development/ the arts build stroh9 mathematica/ski/Is/ the arts advance the mot/vat/on to/ear~ and the a~ks promote positive social deve/opmant/ and, the nonprofit at-ts industry of Cailler County also sl~engthans our /nc/ud/n9 4, s~nd/ng; The of ~ ~/HEREA$, /n economic activi~/ annually, through secondary arts of all the ar'ts to on3anization political, families; /n October of Coil/er NA TXONAL ARTS COLliER COLINT'Y and call upon our citizens to celebrate and promote the at-ks and cullure in our county and to specifically encourage the 9rearer parficipotian of our res/dents and visitors in programs and activities in the arfs and humanities. DONE AND ORDERED TFff$ 8th Day of October, 2002. BOARD OF COLtNT"Y COM44.r$$.~ONER$ PI~OCLA~AA T£ON 4E b~in inju~/ is the leadin9 cause of death of p~rsons ag~ 44 and younger, and kills more Floridians age 34 and younger than other diseases combined; and, ~k'HEREA$, an estimated I§, 000 brain injuries, which physically nad mentally impair our residents, occur in the state of F/or/da each year; and, the Brain Xnjur~ Association of Florida, in conjunction with the Brain and Spinal Cord £njury Program, was organized to advocate on behal£ o£ v/ct/ms o£ brain injury, to provide a clearinghouse for in£ormat/on and resources, and to provide a network o£ £am/Iy support centers £or survivors otc brain injury and their tcami//es. AIO~V THEI~EFOI~E, be it Coil/er Commissioners of October as E. BgOCK, PROCLAA~A TION W14EREA$, the 9oal of 4-14 is to provide educational opportunities for the youth and adult volunteers in Collier County in the areas of leadership, citizenship, p~rsonal development, and practical skills; and, accomplishments that have received State and National ~¢ognJtion; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Counly Commissioners o£ Coil/er Counl~/ £eels this 4-t4 program contributes to the overall development o£ our youth and strengthens out' communities; and, ~V14EREA$, the 4=14 members parents, volunteer and 9uidance £rom interested and StaFF From many youth-servin9 NOW Collier and 9ivin9 Clubs o£ DONE AND ORDERED TH£$ 8~' day of October ..... COmmissioners o£ designated this Board in o£ the 4-14 BOARD OF COUNTY COtHA4_r$$IONER$ COLLEER COUNTY, FLOI~EDA PROCLAA~A TION The National Association of the Advancement of Colored People Freedom Fund Branch (NAACP), will hold its l~ventXeth Freedom Fund Banquet and Awards Ceremony on Saturday, October 2002 at the Elks Lodge; and, ~lillie ~. 6~ry, Esq., ~nior Partner of Gary, ~Iilliams, Parenti, Finney. Lewis. A4ctAanus. Watson and 5perando Law Firm, will be the featured speaker at the Freedom Fund Banquet and Awards Ceremony; and, proceeds of this event will be used to ensure that economical. political, educational and soda/equalHy remain strong within our commun/ly; and. WHEREAS, the public is invited ~ share in this celebration of freedom NOW of designated as DONE AND A TTE$ T: RESOLUTION NO. 02 - 4 2 2 [8A RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER ST-2194 FOR A SPECIAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AN 11,200 SQUARE FOOT DRUG STORE AND A 266-SEAT RESTAURANT ON PROPERTY ZONED C-3ST, LOCATED IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes has conferred on Collier County, the power to establish, coordinate and enforce, zoning and such business regulations as necessary for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted Ordinance 91-102 as amended which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Commissioners, being the duly elected constituted board of the area hereby affected, has held a heating in regular session as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of allowing the construction of an 11,200 square foot drug store and a 266-seat restaurant as shown on the attached plans, Exhibits "A", "B", "C" and "D", in a C-3ST, Commercial Zoning District with Special Treatment Overlay for the property hereinafter described in Exhibit "E", and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and is in accordance with Section 2.2.24 of the Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Petition ST-2194 filed by Michael Landy, P.E., of Landy Engineering, representing the Southwest Florida Opportunity Fund, with respect to the property more particularly described in Exhibit "E" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, be approved for a Special Treatment Development Permit allowing the construction of an 11,200 square foot drug store and a 266-seat restaurant as shown on the attached plot plans, Exhibits "A", "B", "C" and "D", in a C-3ST, Commercial Zoning District with Special Treatment Overlay wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: 1. Permits or letters of exemption from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) shall be presented prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. -1- 8A An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance plan for the site shall be submitted to Current Planning Section Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. Minor revisions to Special Treatment Development Permit No. ST-2194 (including changes in siting and structures) may be approved, in writing, by the Planning Services Director or his/her designee. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number ST-2194 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA OCT - 8 2002 DATE: ~A ? ~, ,A~TTEST: BY: .-,':?: '.." :' '.D~.T E. BROCK, CLERK JA N & .~'~ ,,?,-/ >:. ' ;4': : g~U:~ CLERZ~tCesC as to Chal~'s ~ ~proved as to Form and ~gal Sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney h/ST Resolution -2- C.R. 951 Exhibit "A" SITE DEV~'~OPM£NT P&,4N / / / / ,/~ I I E- ~ ----- s_ L:\67100 Center,~Point\671-OOa.dwg, 9/23/2002 3'48:38 PM I_---- L · :c~ ~ Exhibit "B Il !'~ r8~ Exhibit "C" KENT D. HAMILTON, A.I.A., ARCHITECT ~ ~ Exhibit "D" WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE is made..this day of /~U~,- , 2000, between RICHARD A. VAN WERT, with a mailing add~ess of Van Weft, Zimmer, Bonesteel, Conlin & McCann, P.C., One Militia Drive, ..Lexington, Massachusetts 02421, as the successor Trustee under LAND TRUST NO. 27-8128-00-4 (fOrmerly known as Land Trust ~No. 50,0656)',- and not= individually, as the 'Grantor", and _ SOUTHWEST FLORIDA OPPORTUNITX FUND, L~.L'.C.,- aFlortda Limited Liability Company, with a mailing address of 2223 Trade Center Way, Naples, Florida 34109, as the "Grantee". The Grantor, in consideration of the sum of ONE MILLION ON~ HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($1,150,000.00), and other good and valuable considerations in hand paid, does hereby grant, sell and convey Unto the Grantee the following described real property, situate, lying and~being in Collier County, Florida, together with the tenements and appurtenances thereunto belonging, to wit: Parcel 1 (Oliver); ~The Northwest quarte~ (NW 1/4) of Section 3, Township 51 Sbuth, :Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida: From the Northeast corner of sai~ Northwest quarter (~q4 1/4)' run w~th the SeCtion line North ~9°23,53. West a distance of 324.27 feet to the East right-of-way line Of State Road #951; thence with said right-of-way line South 35°40,08· West a distance of 887.72 feet to the true POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing with said right-of-way line South B5°40,08- West a distance of 365.0 feet to its junction with the North right-of-way line of State Road #RD; thence with the right-of-way line of State Road #90 South~ 24°19'52" East a distance of 69.99 feet and South 54°20,16" East a distance of 159.38 feet; 'thence North 35°39,44" East a distance of 400.0 feet; thence North 54°20,16· West a ' distance of 220.'0 feet to the POINT OF* BEGINNING. Parcel Identification No. 00724640005 Parcel 2 (Collier) : The Northwest quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,~Florida: From the Northeast corner of said Northwest quarter (NW 1/4) run with the Section line North 89°23,53" West a distance of 324.27! feet to the East rig~. t!of-way line o~ State Road #951; thence with said right-of-way line So6th 35°40,08" West a distance of 1252.72 feet to its junction with the North right-of-way line of State'Road #90; thence with the right-of-way line of State Road'#90 South 24~19,52. ~ast a distance of 69.99 feet and South 54°20,16" East a distance of 159.38 feet to the true POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence North -" Exhibit "E" Page 1 of 2 35°39,~4" East a distance of 400 feet;[thence South -- 54°20'16" East a distance of 220 feet; thence South 35o39,44-~West a distance of 400 feet; thence North 54°20,16" West a distance of 220 feet to the POINT OF- BEGINNING. ' :. ..... propertg. i gt :t e: omes ead of the Gra or, who ~ a resident of the state of Ma'Ssachu~s~tts' TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple and to the proper use and benefit forever of said Grantee; This Deed is made subject to real estate taxes; zoning and use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; restrictions and easements common to the subdivision; and 0~tstanding oil, gas and mineral.interests of record, if any. ' - Grantor has s{et his hand and seal, 'IN WITNESS WHERe,the this~ ~ day of ., 2000. Signed~, sealed ~a~d delivered in presence of: ~I~NATURE OF WITNESS No. 1 PRINTED NAME OF WITNESS NO. I NATURk' OF WITNESS No. 2 PRINTED NAME OF WITNESS NO. 2 ~ick~RD ~.- v~ ~RT,: as successor Trustee under LAND TRUST NO. 27-8128-00-4, and not individually, as Grantor t, 8A Exhibit "E" Page 2 of 2 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC NEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: XXX Normal Legal Advertisement [] Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) ************************************************************************************ originating Dept/Div: Comm. Dev. Serv./Planning Person: / ~/~ Date: Petition No. (If none, give brief description): PUDZ-2002-AR-2098, L~nnetka Plaza PUD Petitioner: (Name & Address): Robert L. Duane, Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: Bcnderson Development Company, 8441 Cooper Creek Blvd., University Park, FL 34201 Hearing before [] BCC [] BZA [] Other Requested Hearing date: October 8, 2002 Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if importan0: XXX Naples Daily News [] Other [] Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & conualon location & Size: PUDZ-2002-AR-2098, Robert L. Duanc, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Benderson Development Company, requesting a rezone from PUD to PUD Planned Unit Development known as Lawmetka Plaza PUD for the purpose of readopting the Lawmetka Plaza Planned Unit Development Ordinance No. 99-4, which was originally approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on January 26, 1999, for property located on the northwest comer of Wiggins Pass Road and U.S. 41, in Secfionl 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? advertising costs: 113-138312-6491 l0 · w d by: Approved by: Division H?4~ - Dat~/ County Manager List Attach~/nts: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS Date [] Yes [] No If Yes, what account should be charged for A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLE~'S OffiCE USE O~Y: . Date Received: , '/ Date of Public he,g: Date Adve~sed:.. ORDINANCE NO. 02- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 8516N BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "PUD" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS LAWMETKA PLAZA PUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WIGGINS PASS ROAD (C.R. 888) AND U.S. 41, IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 34+ ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBERS 99-4 AND 90-26 RESPECTIVELY, THE FORMER LAMETKA PLAZA PUD(s); AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Robert L. Duane, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Benderson Development Company, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification o£ the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the Lawmetka Plaza PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 8516N, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. _SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 99-4 and Ordinance Number 90-26, both known as the Lawmetaka Plaza PUD, adopted on January 26, 1999 and March 27, 1990, repsectively, are hereby repealed in their entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ~ day of ,2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency ~~Marjorie M. Student Assistant County Attorney PUDZ-2002-AR-2098/RB/lo LAWMETKA PLAZA A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT A Prepared for: BENDERSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 8441 Cooper Creek Blvd. University Park, FL 34201 Prepared by: HOLE MONTES, INC. 950 Encore Way Naples, Florida 34110 And YOUNG, VANASSENDERP, VARNADOE, AND ANDERSON, P.A. 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Ste. 300 Naples, Florida 34108 October, 1998 REVISED AUGUST, 2002 HMA File No. 2001.126 Date Reviewed by CCPC: Date Approved by BCC: Ordinance No. Amendments & Repeals Exhibit "A" TABLE OFCONTENTS Page SECTION I - Statement of Compliance ................................................................................................... 1 SECTION II - Property Ownership, Legal Description Short Title and Statement of Unified Control .................................................................................... 2 SECTION III - Statement of Intent and Project Description ................................................................... 3 SECTION IV - General Development Regulations ................................................................................. 4 SECTION V - Permitted Uses and Dimensional Standards for Tracts A and B ..................................... 8 SECTION VI - Permitted Uses and Dimensional Standards for Tract C .............................................. 11 SECTION VII- Environmental Standards .............................................................................................. 14 SECTION VIII- Transportation Requirements ...................................................................................... 16 SECTION IX - Utility and Engineering Requirements .......................................................................... 17 SECTION X - Water Management Requirements ................................................................................. 19 Exhibit A - PUD Master Plan Exhibit B - Legal Description EXHIBITS SECTION I Statement of Compliance The development of approximately thirty-four (34) acres of property in Collier County, as a Planned Unit Development, to be known as Lawmetka Plaza, will be in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The commercial uses of Lawmetka Plaza will be consistent with growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives of each of the elements of the Growth Management Plan for the following reasons: The subject property is located in an area identified as an Activity Center on the Future Land Use Map of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Activity Centers are the preferred locations for the concentration of commercial and mixed use development activities. The subject tract is located on the northwest comer of the intersection of U.S. 41 and Wiggins Pass Road. This strategic location allows the site superior access for the placement of commercial activities. The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the Growth Management Plan. o The project will be served by a complete range of services and utilities as approved by the County. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. o The project development will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policies 3.1 .H and L of the Future Land Use Element. o The project development is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities as may be required by Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element. All final Local Development Orders for this project are subject to the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. -1- SECTION II Property Ownership, Legal Description Short Title and Statement of Unified Control 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Property_ Ownership The subject property is currently under the ownership of Benderson Development Company. Legal Description All that part of the southeast ~,4 of the northeast ~,4 of Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. General Description of Property The subject property is located on the northwest comer of Wiggins Pass Road and U.S. 41. The zoning of the subject property prior to the application of rezoning is PUD. Physical Description The site is generally flat and naturally drains to the east and west. Access to the property will be via four entrances, two on U.S. 41 and two from Wiggins Pass Road. A wetland Preserve Area, comprising 8.5 acres, is located along the western portion of the property. The flood elevation of the subject property is A.E. 11. Short Title This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Lawmetka Plaza Planned Unit Development Ordinance". Statement of Unified Control This statement represents that the current property owner has lands under unified control for the purpose of obtaining PUD Zoning on the subject property. Development of this Planned Unit Development will occur in accordance with the Planned Unit Development regulations contained herein and any conditions approved with the Rezone Petition as described and agreed to within the PUD Ordinance. -2- SECTION III Statement of Intent and Project Description 3.1 Introduction It is the intent of this ordinance is to establish a Planned Unit Development meeting the requirements as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) that will permit approximately thirty-four (34) acres of retail, office, hotel/motel use, including 8.5 acres of Preservation Area for the subject property. The purpose of this document is to set forth guidelines for the future development of the project that meet accepted planning principles and practices, and to implement the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 3.2 Project Description It is the intent of this project to create an integrated commercial development with a compatible mixture of commercial land uses and open spaces. The developer, who has unified control over the subject property, intends to commence development of a mixed use activity center Planned Unit Development (PUD). It is the intent of the developer to develop architecturally unified commercial establishments based on the concept of arrangement and unified management control. The unified development approval under the PUD district designation will ensure that the shopping center is aesthetically pleasing and functionally efficient. It will allow an efficient pattern of internal circulation to be established and limited points of vehicular ingress and egress. These functional and aesthetic advantages, which cannot be provided in the conventional strip commercial development configurations, have been maximized and shall be sustained in the approval of this Planned Unit Development. 3.3 Land Use Plan and Project Phasing mo The PUD Master Plan contains a total of three (3) tracts consisting of development areas A, B, and C and one Tract D consisting of an upland and wetland Preserve Area in addition to street right-of-way. The Master Plan is designed to be flexible with regard to the placement of buildings, tracts and related utilities and water management facilities. More detailed plans will be submitted at the time of site development plan and permitting approval, based on compliance with all applicable requirements of this ordinance, the LDC and Local, State and Federal permitting requirements. All tracts may be combined or developed separately subject to compliance with the applicable dimensional requirements contained within this document. Bo The anticipated time of build-out of the project is approximately five (5) years from the time of issuance of the first building permit. -3- SECTION IV General Development Regulations The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development regulations that may be applied generally to the development of the Lawmetka Plaza Planned Unit Development and Master Plan. 4.1 General The following are general provisions applicable to the PUD Master Plan: Regulations for development of the Lawmetka Plaza PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, the PUD-Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorize the construction of improvements. The developer, his successor or assignee, agree to follow the PUD Master Plan and the regulations of this PUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this agreement. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of building permit application. Co All conditions imposed and all graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the Lawmetka Plaza PUD shall become part of the regulations which govern the manner in which this site may be developed. Do Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Div. 3.15 Adequate Public Facilities of the LDC at the earliest or next to occur of either final SDP approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. Unless specifically waived through any variance or waiver provisions from any other applicable regulations, the provisions of those regulations not otherwise provided for in this PUD remain in full force and effect. 4.2 Site Clearing and Drainage Clearing, grading, earthwork, and site drainage work shall be performed in accordance with the Collier County LDC and the standards and commitments of this document in -4- 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 effect at the time of construction plan approval. Easements for Utilities Easements, where required, shall be provided for water management areas, utilities and other purposes as may be required by Collier County. All necessary easements, dedications or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continued operation and maintenance of all services and utilities. This will be in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time construction plans and plat approvals are requested. Amendments to the Ordinance The proposed PUD Master Plan is conceptual in nature and subject to change within the context of the development standards contained in this ordinance. Amendments to this Ordinance and PUD Master Plan shall be made pursuant to Section 2.7.3.5 of the Collier County LDC in effect at the time such amendment may be requested. Project Plan Approval Requirements Exhibit "A", the PUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. Subsequent to, or concurrent with PUD approval, a Preliminary Subdivision Plat (if required) shall be submitted for the entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan. All division of property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the subdivision regulations set forth in Section 3.2 of the LDC. Prior to the recording of the final subdivision plat, when required by the Subdivision Regulations set forth in Section 3.2 of the LDC, final plans of the required improvements shall receive the approval of all appropriate Collier County governmental agencies to ensure compliance with the PUD Master Plan, the County Subdivision Regulations and the platting laws of the State of Florida. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development orders, the provisions of Section 3.3, Site Development Plans shall be applied to all platted parcels, where applicable. Should no subdivision of land occur, Section 3.3 shall be applicable to the development of all tracts as shown on the PUD Master Plan. Provision for Off-site Removal of Earthen Material The excavation of earthen material and its stockpiling in preparation of water management facilities or to otherwise develop water bodies is hereby permitted. If, after consideration of fill activities on buildable portions of the project site, there is a surplus of earthen material, off-site disposal is also hereby permitted subject to the following conditions: -5- 8B "'1 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 4.12 mo Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a "Development Excavation" pursuant to Section 3.5.5.1.3 of the LDC, whereby off-site removal shall not exceed ten (10) percent of the total volume excavated up to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards. B. A timetable to facilitate said removal shall be submitted to the Development Services' Manager for approval. Said timetable shall include the length of time it will take to complete said removal, hours of operation and haul routes. C. All other provisions of Section 3.5 of the LDC are applicable. Sunset and Monitoring Provisions Lawmetka Plaza PUD shall be subject to Section 2.7.3.4 of the LDC, Time Limits for Approved PUD Master Plans and Section 2.7.3.6 Monitoring Requirements. Polling Places Any community recreation/public building/public room or similar common facility located within the Lawmetka Plaza PUD may be used for a polling place, if determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners upon recommendation of the Supervisor of Elections in accordance with Section 2.6.30 of the LDC. Native Vegetation The project will meet the native vegetation requirements of Division 3.9, Vegetation Removal, Protection and Preservation of the LDC for the subject property. Open Space Open space may be in the form of landscaping, additional buffers, passive or active recreation areas and water management facilities. The total aggregate of such open space areas shall meet or exceed the open space requirements of Sec. 2.6.32.3 of the LDC, which requires a minimum of thirty (30) percent for commercial developments. A majority of the open space area for the project is provided in the 8.5 acre Preserve Area, parcel D. Archaeological Resources The developer shall be subject to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the LDC pertaining to archaeological resources in the event that they are contained on the property. Common Area Maintenance Common Area Maintenance, including the maintenance of common facilities, open -6- 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 spaces, and water management facilities shall be the responsibility of a homeowners' association to be established by the developer. Architectural and Site Design Standards All development within Lawmetka Plaza shall be subject to Division 2.8 of the LDC and architectural considerations shall be unified for each tract including building design, landscaping, and signage. The development of the first tract will set the standards for other development areas, unless architectural guidelines are established in advance of development of the first tract in the form of deed restrictions or other measures acceptable to Collier County. Signs All signage shall be in conformance with Division 2.5 of the LDC; however, platted interior tracts are permitted two (2) ground signs at the tract entrance, not to exceed a total of one hundred and twenty (120) feet at each tract entrance. Parking All development shall be subject to Division 2.3 of the LDC, Off-Street Parking and Loading. Landscaping All landscaping shall be in conformance with Division 2.4 of the LDC. Utility Areas Utility areas, including trash receptacles, shall be completely screened from the view of customers and adjacent property owners to a height of 6 feet above finished grade. -7- 5.1 5.2 5.3 SECTION V Permitted Uses and Dimensional Standards for Tracts A and B Purpose The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for Tracts A and B within the Lawmetka Plaza PUD designated for commercial development on the PUD Master Plan, Exhibit "A". Development Intensity A maximum of two hundred and seventy_thousand (270,000) square feet of floor area is allowed for permitted retail and office uses on Lawmetka Plaza's parcel A and B and C or subdivisions, thereof. Hotel/motel uses may be developed at twenty-six (26) dwelling units per acre on Tract A. In calculating the number of Hotel/Motel units all or a portion of the Preservation Area on Parcel D may be utilized. General Description The PUD Master Plan designates the following uses for each tract designated on the PUD Master Plan. TRACT ACRES HEIGHT USE A 16.4 50 Retail, Office, Hotel/Motel B 2.7 35 Retail or Office C 4.9 35~ Retail or Office2 D 8.5 N.A. Preservation Area ROAD 1.5 N.A. Road TOTAL 34 Architectural_embellishments are permitted above the height of thirty-five (35) feet to a maximum height of fifty (50) feet. 2~Other uses are also permitted on Tract C. (See Section VI of this Ordinance.) The approximate acreage of commercial tracts is depicted on the PUD Master Plan. Actual acreage of all development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with Article 3, Division 3.3, and Division 3.2, respectively, of the Collier County Land Development Code. All tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways, open spaces, water management facilities, and other similar uses to support non-residential development of the subject property. -8- J 8B 5.4 5.5 5.6 Permitted Principal Uses and Structures No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: Permitted commercial and conditional uses allowed in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate District, as of the effective date of adoption of this Ordinance, excluding Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. Bo Permitted commercial and conditional uses in the C-4, General Commercial District with the exception of the following uses: Bottle Clubs; Fuel Dealers (groups 5983 - 5989); Automotive repair services, parking (groups 7514, 7515,7521); Amusement and recreational services, outdoor (all groups); Homeless Shelters, Soup Kitchens, Justice, Public Order and Safety (groups 9222-9224); Communication Towers above height of 100 feet M.S.L., subject to Section 2.6.3.5 of the LDC, Flea Markets, Recycling Activities except as may be required by the County, Outside Kennels, Tattoo or Massage Parlors, and Agricultural Services (all groups). Permitted Accessory_ Uses and Structures No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, on land, in whole or part, for other than the following: mo Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the above permitted commercial principal uses and structures. Dimensional Requirements Minimum Lot Area Twenty thousand (20,000) square feet B. Minimum Lot Width One hundred (100) square feet C. Minimum Yard Requirements From Project Perimeter boundary lines -thirty-five (35) feet. From internal tract boundary lines - twenty (20) feet. ° Distance between principal structures shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet or one-half (1/2) the sum of the heights of the two buildings, whichever is greater. -9- Do II, Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structure 1000 square feet per building on the ground floor except that freestanding specialty structures of nationally recognized standard size less than 1000 square feet shall be permitted when site plan approval has been received. Maximum Height Fifty (50) feet above finished grade for Tract A and thirty-five (35) feet above finished grade for Tract B. Minimum Off-Street Parking and Off-Street Loading Requirements As required by Division 2.3 of the LDC. Minimum Landscaping Requirements As required by Division 2.4 of the LDC. Merchandise Storage and Display Unless specifically permitted by certain uses, there shall be no outside storage or display of merchandise. Hotel/Motel Use Should hotel/motel uses develop on Tract A, such uses shall be subject to the requirements of Section 5.2, Development Intensity, of this Ordinance. Design Guidelines For all development tracts, the total maximum floor area for a single business establishment, either free standing or located within a building with other establishments shall be sixty-five thousand (65,000) square feet of gross leaseable floor area at the ground level. The development shall be designed so that glare from lighting shall not penetrate adjoining properties. All fixtures shall be designed such that the actual lighting element shall not be visible from adjoining properties. All mechanical equipment shall be enclosed or shielded by a visual and noise absorbing barrier when placed on the north or west side of the structure to which it is attached including roof mounted mechanical equipment. -10- For any use involving the placement of vehicles, including but not limited to parking lots, internal circulation areas, and loading areas, adjacent to buffers areas, a minimum of four (4) feet tall opaque vegetative hedge shall be installed to eliminate headlights shining into and across the buffer area. -11 - SECTION VI Permitted Uses and Dimensional Requirements for Tract C 6.0 6.1 6.2 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the permitted uses and land development regulations for Tract C designated on the PUD Master Plan, along with other permitted uses. USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Homes for the Aged Hospices Adult/child care centers Convalescent centers Nursing Homes Rest homes Sanitariums Adult Congregate Living Facility Retail or office use as permitted by Section 5.4, excluding free-standing cocktail lounge Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the director determines to be compatible in the District. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this District. DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Minimum Lot Area One (1) acre B. Minimum Lot Width One hundred (100) feet -12- C. Minimum Yard Requirements The following building setback shall apply: From eastern property line - thirty-five (35) feet. From northern property line - seventy (70) feet (inclusive of 40 foot Florida Department of Transportation drainage easement). From internal tract boundary lines - twenty (20) feet. Distance between principal structures shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet or one-half the sum of the heights of the two buildings, whichever is greater. D. Maximum Height Three stories not to exceed thirty five (35) feet, however, architecture embellishments may be extended above the thirty-five height limitation to a maximum height of fifty (50) feet. E. Minimum Off-Street Parking and Off-Street Loading Requirements As required by Division 2.3 of the LDC. F. Minimum Landscaping and Buffering Requirements 1. For all but northern property line as required by Division 2.4 of the LDC. For the northern property line, the owner of Parcel C shall maintain a fifteen (15) foot landscape buffer measured from the southern edge of the Florida Department of Transportation drainage easement. An architecturally finished opaque masonry wall a minimum of six (6) feet in height shall be installed within the buffer area. This buffer shall be installed as a required improvement for the first Site Development Plan within the PUD. To the greatest extent practical the existing native vegetation (Pine trees, etc.) shall be retained within the buffer area and Florida Department of Transportation drainage easement, and where not practical within the buffer area, trees no more than twenty-five (25) feet on center or a hedge no more than four (4) feet on center, or a combination shall be planted on the northern side of the wall. Any new trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height with a three (3) foot spread at the time of installation. Any hedge shall be a minimum often (10) gallon plants five (5) feet in height with a three (3) foot spread at time of installation. Except to the extent of any conflict with the foregoing requirement, all of the Landscaping and Buffering requirements of Division 2.4 of the LDC also apply to Parcel C, and in the event of a conflict between the -13- Go Landscaping and Buffering requirements of this section and those of the LDC, the more restrictive shall apply. Design Guidelines In accordance with the requirements of Section 5.6J of this Ordinance. - 14- SECTION VII Environmental Standards The purpose of this Section is to set forth the environmental commitments of the Project Developer. 7.1 An 8.4 acre upland and wetland Preserve Area is located along the western portion of the subject property and is permitted to be used for open space and passive recreational use only. All preservation areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation tracts or easements on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Buffers shall be provided in accordance with Subsection 3.2.8.4.7.3 of the LDC. 7.2 A Gopher Tortoise relocation plan shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. The approved language shall be added to the site development plan or construction plans. Off-site relocation may be required if the applicant cannot provide adequate habitat for on-site relocation. 7.3 Petitioner shall be subject to the Collier County Growth Management Plan Policy 12.1.3 contained in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (discovery of a archaeological or historical site, artifact or other indicator of preservation). 7.4 7.5 7.6 Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the state of Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules and be subject to review and approval by Current Planning Environmental Review Staff. Removal of exotic vegetation shall not be counted towards mitigation for impacts to Collier County jurisdictional wetlands. Buffers shall be provided around wetlands, extending at least fifteen (15) feet landward from the edge of wetland preserves in all places and averaging twenty-five (25) feet from the landward edge of wetlands. Where natural buffers are not possible, structural buffers shall be provided in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resources Permit Rules and be subject to review and approval by Current Planning Environmental Staff. Native vegetation preservation shall conform to the requirements of Subsection 3.9.5.5.4 of the Collier County LDC and the Preserve Areas, shall be generally provided for as depicted on the PUD Master Plan, Exhibit A. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance (exotic free) plan for the site, with emphasis on the preservation area, shall be submitted to the Current Planning Environmental Review staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan/Construction Approval. A schedule for exotic removal with all Preservation Areas shall be submitted with the above mentioned plan. -15- 7.7 Petitioner shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) regarding potential impacts to protected wildlife species. Where protected, species are observed on site, a habitat management plan for these protected species shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan/Construction Approval. -16- SECTION VIII Transportation Requirements The purpose of this Section is to set forth the transportation commitments of the project development. 8.1 Subject to Florida Department of Transportation approval, the developer shall provide left and right turn lanes on Tamiami Trail at both project entrances. Should any of the required turn lanes be constructed due to other development activity in the area prior to completion of this project, the developer shall provide a fair share reimbursement of the cost of such construction. The Florida Department of Transportation and Collier County each reserve the right to control median openings, both existing and future, and to limit access points to right tums in and right turns out. 8.2 The developer shall provide left and right turn lanes on Wiggins Pass Road at the project's two entrances. 8.3 All road access points requiring turn lanes and use of existing right-of-way shall provide for compensating right-of-way dedication. 8.4 Existing drainage easements, future drainage easements, and planned preserve areas shall remain available to Collier County and Florida Department of Transportation for future roadway water management purposes subject to appropriate capacity controls and operating controls. The responsibility for maintenance of such areas shall remain with the developer/owner and/or assignees. 8.5 The northern access on Tamiami Trail shall be in alignment with Old U.S. 41 (CR 887). The developer shall be responsible for any and all costs incurred in modifying the traffic signal installation at Old U.S. 41 so as to accommodate the project. 8.6 The road impact fees shall be in accordance with the fee structure set forth in Ordinance 92-22 or as may be amended and shall be paid at the time building permits are issued unless otherwise approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 8.7 All required access improvements shall be in place before any certificates of occupancy are issued and shall not be subject to impact fee credits. 8.8 All traffic control devices used shall conform to requirements of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as required by Chapter 316.0747, Florida Statutes. 8.9 Internal roadways will be public or private. -17- SECTION IX Utility and Engineering Requirements The purpose of this Section is to set forth the utilities and engineering commitments of the project developer. 9.1 Utilities mo Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 88-76, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. Bo All customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage collection facilities to be constructed will be customers of the County and will be billed by the County in accordance with the County's established rates. Should the County not be in a position to provide sewer service to the project, the sewer customers shall be customers of the interim utility established to serve the project until the County's off- site sewer facilities are available to serve the project. Prior to approval of construction documents by the County, the developer must present verification, pursuant to Chapter 367, Florida Statutes, that the Florida Public Service Commission has granted territorial rights to the developer to provide sewer service to the project until the County can provide these services through its sewer facilities. Do The utility construction documents for the project's sewerage system shall contain the design and construction of an onsite force main, which will ultimately connect the project to the future central sewerage facilities of Collier County. The force main must be interconnected to the pump station with appropriately located valves to permit for simple redirection of the project's sewage, when connection to the County's central sewer facilities becomes available. Prior to or at the time of submission of construction plans and final plat for the project, the potable water supply from the Collier County Water-Sewer District to serve this project shall be installed adjacent to the property and be in service. 9.2 Engineering mo Detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to the Development Services Department for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to the and until approval of the proposed construction, in accordance with the submitted plans, is granted by the Development Services Department. -18- 8B B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County LDC. C. Subdivision of the site shall require platting in accordance with Section 3.2 of LDC to define the right-of-way and tracts shown on the PUD Master Plan. Do The developer and all subsequent owners of this project shall be required to satisfy the requirements of all County ordinances or codes in effect prior to or concurrent with any subsequent development order relating to this site, including but not limited to Preliminary Subdivision Plats, Site Development Plans and any other applications that will result in the issuance of a final development order. -19- SECTION X Water Management Requirements The purpose of this Section is to set forth the water management commitments of the project developer. 10.1 Detailed paving, grading and site drainage plans shall be submitted to the Development Services Department for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction, in accordance with the submitted plans, is granted by the Development Services Department. 10.2 Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County LDC, except that excavation for water management features shall be allowed within twenty (20) feet from side, rear or abutting property lines with side, rear or abutting property lines fenced. 10.3 Landscaping may be placed within the water management area in compliance with the criteria established within Section 2.4.7.3 of the LDC. 10.4 The wet season water table elevation shall be established at the time of South Florida Water Management District permitting, which is required for the subject property. 10.5 One half (1/2) inch of dry pretreatment shall precede the discharge of any water into the preservation area or whatever alternate conditions may be incorporated into the South Florida Water Management District permitting requirements. 10.6 The stormwater system shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County Public Works Engineering (PWED) in order to verify its consistency with the Wiggins Pass outfall project now being designed by PWED. W5200 IX2001126~?~LD\PUD-ORIGINAL 08-2002.doc - 20 - I I I I I I EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of the southeast ¼ of the northeast ¼ of Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Flofida~, August 30, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUDZ-2002-AR-2098 Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Sunday, September 22, 2002 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: Account 113-138312-649110 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 8516N BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "PUD" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS LAWMETKA PLAZA PUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WIGGINS PASS ROAD(C.R. 888) AND U.S 41, IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 34+ ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBERS 99-4 AND 90-26 RESPECTIVELY, THE FORMER LAWMETKA PLAZA PUD(S); AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition PUDZ-2002-AR-2098, Robert L. Duane, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Benderson Development Company, requesting a rezone from PUD to PUD Planned Unit Development known as Lawmetka Plaza PUD for the purpose of readopting the Lawmetka Plaza Planned Unit Development Ordinance No. 99-4, which was originally approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on January 26, 1999, for property located on the northwest corner of Wiggins Pass Road and U.S. 41, in Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) August 30, 2002 Robert L. Duane Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition PUDA-2002-AR-2098 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, September 22, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Carleen A. Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure August 30, 2002 Benderson Development Company 8441 Cooper Creek Blvd. University Park, FL 34201 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition PUDA-2002-AR-2098 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, September 22, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Carleen A. Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Carleen A. Edwards To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com PUDZ-2002-AR-2098 Attached is the advertising to run in the paper on 09/22/02. Thank you & have a nice Labor Day Weekend. PUDZ-2002-AR-209 PUDZ-2002-AR-209 8.doc 8.doc Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@clerk.collier.fl .us Friday, August 30, 2002 2:43 PM Carleen A. Edwards Delivery Status Notification (Relay) A~-F07161.txt PUDZ-2002-AR-209 8 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals@naplesnews.com Naples Daily News NapLes/ FL Affidavit of Publication NapLes Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COflMISSIOHERS CHERI LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 1131383126491 58523709 PUDZ-2002-AR-2098 NO State of FLorida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, ~ho on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily Ne~s, a daily newspaper published bt Naples/ in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said ne~sbaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida/ and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, FLorida/ each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples/ in said Collier County/ FLorida, for a period of I year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pubLiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 09/22 AD SPACE: 163.000 INCH FILED ON: 09/23/02 Signature of Affiant ,//~J -~' ' to and Subscribed b f me t ~-~4;~ay o'f , Personally known by me PUDZ.2002-AR-2098 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice Is hereby given that on TUESDAY, OC- TOBER 8, 2002, In the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Govern- menf Center, 3301 East Tamlaml Trail NapleS, Florida, ttm BOard of County Commissioners will consider the enact- merit of a County Ordl- commence at ~.00 Ordinance is as tollov~ AN ORDINANCE[ AMENDING ORDI-I NANCE NUMBER| 91-102, THE COLLIER| COUNTY LAND DE-| ' VELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHEN- SIVE ZONING REGU- LATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUM- BERED 8516N BY CHANGING THE ZON- ING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DE- SCRIBED REAL PROP- ERTY FROM "PUD" ,TO ~UD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS LAWMET- KA PLAZA PUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WIGGINS| PASS ROAD(CR. 888)1 AND U.S 41, IN SEC-I TION 16, TOWNSHIP 48| SOUTH, RANGE 25| EAST, COLLIER/ COUNTY, FLORIDA,| CONSISTING OF 34+/ ACRES; PROVIDINGi FOR .THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUM- BERS 99.4 AND 90-26 RESPECTIVELY, THE FORMER LAwMET~) pLAZA PUD(S); A BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition PUDZ- 2002.AR-2098, Reberf L. Duana, of Hole Inc., rel~esenflng ~ae~- son Develop. mart ny~ requesting a rezor~. from PUD to PUD Piannea Unlf Development known os Lowmeika Plaza. PUD for the purpose o~ r..ea- dopflng the LawmelKo Plaz= Planned Unit Devel- opment Ordinance No. 99-4, which was originally opproved by the ~:olller County Board of County Commissioners on Jonu- Ro~:l and U.S. 41, In $~.c2 tlon 16, Townshl~ ~ South, Range 25 East, Col- I1~ County, Florlcla. Copies of the Ordlr~nce c~e on hie wrm the Clerk to the Board and ~re available for Imeec- are Invited to effend aflol be hOard. NO:FIE: All persons wish- lng to speak on qny oge..n:j cia Ifem musf register w~n! orlor to preser~mon o~/ ers will be ilm..ne<3 minutes on (my .~e.m... selection of qn i .n~jv.~um to sl~ on ~mo~ o~ a.n organlzc~oO...or group. encouroge~. I~ .recogn~ze~ by the Chairman, seokesp.er .sqp for a ~ro~p_ ~ org~nlzollon m~¥ ~e m- IoYmd 10 mlnufes to spe~k on an hem. Persons wishing to h.~ ~ emmda ~kets must Imum ~f 3 waeks prm~. heoring. In any case, wt'.' ORDINANCE NO. 02- 51 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 8516N BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "PUD" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS LAWMETKA PLAZA PUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WIGGINS PASS ROAD (C.R. 888) AND U.S. 41, IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 34+ ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBERS 99-4 AND 90-26 RESPECTIVELY, THE FORMER LAMETKA PLAZA PUD(s); AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 8B WHEREAS, Robert L. Duane, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Benderson Development Company, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the Lawmetka Plaza PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 8516N, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 99-4 and Ordinance Number 90-26, both known as the Lawmetaka Plaza PUD, adopted on January 26, 1999 and March 27, 1990, repsectively, are hereby repealed in their entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, . :.,Ftori~da','.tih~:~[/~_ day of ~ ,2002. : " ' ~:~ BOARD OF CO~TY COMMISSIONERS DW~ E BROCK, Approved as to Fo~ signature only. and Legal Sufficiency Mmjorie~. Student Assistant Coun~ A~orney PUDZ-2002-AR-2098/RB/Io LAWMETKA PLAZA A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT A Prepared for: BENDERSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 8441 Cooper Creek Blvd. University Park, FL 34201 Prepared by: HOLE MONTES, INC. 950 Encore Way Naples, Florida 34110 And YOUNG, VANASSENDERP, VARNADOE, AND ANDERSON, P.A. 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Ste. 300 Naples, Florida 34108 October, 1998 REVISED AUGUST, 2002 HMA File No. 2001.126 Date Reviewed by CCPC: Date Approved by BCC: 10 / 08 / 02 Ordinance No. 2002 - 51 Amendments &Repeals 90-26 and 99-4 F:LPUD DocumentsXLawmetka5. doc TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I - Statement of Compliance .................................................................................................... 1 SECTION II - Property Ownership, Legal Description Short Title and Statement of Unified Control ..................................................................................... 2 SECTION III - Statement of Intent and Project Description .................................................................... 3 SECTION IV - General Development Regulations .................................................................................. 4 SECTION V - Permitted Uses and Dimensional Standards for Tracts A and B ...................................... 8 SECTION VI - Permitted Uses and Dimensional Standards for Tract C ............................................... 12 SECTION VII- Environmental Standards ............................................................................................... 15 SECTION vm- Transportation Requirements ....................................................................................... 17 SECTION IX - Utility and Engineering Requirements ........................................................................... 18 SECTION X - Water Management Requirements .................................................................................. 19 Exhibit A - PUD Master Plan Exhibit B - Legal Description EXHIBITS F:\PUD Documents'~Lawmetka5.doc SECTION I Statement of Compliance The development of approximately thirty-four (34) acres of property in Collier County, as a Planned Unit Development, to be known as Lawmetka Plaza, will be in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The commercial uses of Lawmetka Plaza will be consistent with growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives of each of the elements of the Growth Management Plan for the following reasons: The subject property is located in an area identified as an Activity Center on the Future Land Use Map of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Activity Centers are the preferred locations for the concentration of commercial and mixed use development activities. o The subject tract is located on the northwest comer of the intersection of U.S. 41 and Wiggins Pass Road. This strategic location allows the site superior access for the placement of commercial activities. The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the Growth Management Plan. The project will be served by a complete range of services and utilities as approved by the County. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. o The project development will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policies 3.1.H and L of the Future Land Use Element. ° The project development is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities as may be required by Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element. All final Local Development Orders for this project are subject to Division 3-15, Adequate Public Facilities of the Land Development Code. F:\PUD DocumentsXLawmetka5.doc -1- 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 SECTION II Property Ownership, Legal Description Short Title and Statement of Unified Control Property Ownership The subject property is currently under the ownership of Benderson Development Company. Legal Description All that part of the southeast ¼ of the northeast ¼ of Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. General Description of Property The subject property is located on the northwest comer of Wiggins Pass Road and U.S. 41. The zoning of the subject property prior to the application ofrezoning is PUD. Physical Description The site is generally flat and naturally drains to the east and west. Access to the property will be via four entrances, two on U.S. 41 and two from Wiggins Pass Road. A Wetland Preserve Area, comprising 8.5 acres, is located along the western portion of the property. The flood elevation of the subject property is A.E. 11. Short Title This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Lawmetka Plaza Planned Unit Development Ordinance". Statement of Unified Control This statement represents that the current property owner has lands under unified control for the purpose of obtaining PUD Zoning on the subject property. Development of this Planned Unit Development will occur in accordance with the Planned Unit Development regulations contained herein and any conditions approved with the rezone petition as described and agreed to within the PUD Ordinance. FAPUD Documents~Lawmetka5.doc 2 3.1 3.2 3.3 SECTION m Statement of Intent and Project Description Introduction It is the intent of this Ordinance is to establish a Planned Unit Development meeting the requirements as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) that will permit approximately thirty-four (34) acres of retail, office, hotel/motel use, including 8.5 acres of Preservation Area for the subject property. The purpose of this Document is to set forth guidelines for the future development of the project that meet accepted planning principles and practices, and to implement the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Project Description It is the intent of this project to create an integrated commercial development with a compatible mixture of commercial land uses and open spaces. The developer, who has unified control over the subject property, intends to commence development of a mixed use activity center Planned Unit Development (PUD). It is the intent of the developer to develop architecturally unified commercial establishments based on the concept of arrangement and unified management control. The unified development approval under the PUD district designation will ensure that the shopping center is aesthetically pleasing and functionally efficient. It will allow an efficient pattern of internal circulation to be established and limited points of vehicular ingress and egress. These functional and aesthetic advantages, which cannot be provided in conventional strip commercial development configurations, have been maximized and shall be sustained in the approval of this Planned Unit Development. Land Use Plan and Project Phasing The PUD Master Plan contains a total of three (3) tracts consisting of development areas A, B, and C and one Tract D consisting of an Upland and Wetland Preserve Area in addition to street right-of-way. The Master Plan is designed to be flexible with regard to the placement of buildings, tracts and related utilities and water management facilities. More detailed plans will be submitted at the time of site development plan and permitting approval, based on compliance with all applicable requirements of this Ordinance, the LDC and local, state and federal permitting requirements. All tracts may be combined or developed separately subject to compliance with the applicable dimensional requirements contained within this Document. The anticipated time of build-out of the project is approximately five (5) years from the time of issuance of the first building permit. F:LPUD Documents~Lawmetka5.doc SECTION IV General Development Regulations The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development regulations that may be applied generally to the development of the Lawmetka Plaza Planned Unit Development and Master Plan. 4.1 General The following are general provisions applicable to the PUD Master Plan: Regulations for development of the Lawmetka Plaza PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Document, the PUD-Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorize the construction of improvements. The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the PUD Master Plan and the regulations of this PUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this agreement. Bo Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of building permit application. All conditions imposed and all graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the Lawmetka Plaza PUD shall become part of the regulations which govern the manner in which this site may be developed. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.15 Adequate Public Facilities of the LDC. Uo Unless specifically waived through any variance or waiver provisions from any other applicable regulations, the provisions of those regulations not otherwise provided for in this PUD remain in full force and effect. 4.2 Site Clearing and Drainage Clearing, grading, earthwork, and site drainage work shall be performed in accordance with the Collier County LDC and the standards and commitments of this Document in effect at the time of construction plan approval. 4.3 Easements for Utilities Easements, where required, shall be provided for water management areas, utilities and other F:kPUD DocumentskLawmetka5.doc 4 '813 ' 4.4 4.5 4.6 purposes as may be required by Collier County. All necessary easements, dedications or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continued operation and maintenance of all services and utilities. This will be in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time construction plans and plat approvals are requested. Amendments to the Ordinance The proposed PUD Master Plan is conceptual in nature and subject to change within the context of the development standards contained in this Ordinance. Amendments to this Ordinance and PUD Master Plan shall be made pursuant to Section 2.7.3.5 of the Collier County LDC in effect at the time such amendment may be requested. Project Plan Approval Requirements Exhibit "A", the PUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. Subsequent to, or concurrent with PUD approval, a Preliminary Subdivision Plat (if required) shall be submitted for the entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan. All division of property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the subdivision regulations set forth in Section 3.2 of the LDC. Prior to the recording of the final subdivision plat, when required by the Subdivision Regulations set forth in Section 3.2 of the LDC, final plans of the required improvements shall receive the approval of all appropriate Collier County governmental agencies to ensure compliance with the PUD Master Plan, the County Subdivision Regulations and the platting laws of the State of Florida. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development orders, the provisions of Section 3.3, Site Development Plans shall be applied to all platted parcels, where applicable. Should no subdivision of land occur, Section 3.3 shall be applicable to the development of all tracts as shown on the PUD Master Plan. Provision for Off-site Removal of Earthen Material The excavation of earthen material and its stockpiling in preparation of water management facilities or to otherwise develop water bodies is hereby permitted. If, after consideration of fill activities on buildable portions of the project site, there is a surplus of earthen material, off-site disposal is also hereby permitted subject to the following conditions: FSPUD DocumentsXLawmetka5.doc -5- Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a "Development Excavation" pursuant to Section 3.5.5.1.3 of the LDC, whereby off-site removal shall not exceed ten (10) percent of the total volume excavated up to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards. A timetable to facilitate said removal shall be submitted to the Development Services Manager for approval. Said timetable shall include the length of time it will take to complete said removal, hours of operation and haul routes. C. All other provisions of Section 3.5 of the LDC are applicable. 4.7 Sunset and Monitoring Provisions Lawmetka Plaza PUD shall be subject to Section 2.7.3.4 of the LDC, Time Limits for Approved PUD Master Plans and Section 2.7.3.6, Monitoring Requirements. 4.8 Polling Places Any community recreation/public building/public room or similar common facility located within the Lawmetka Plaza PUD may be used for a polling place, if determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners upon recommendation of the Supervisor of Elections in accordance with Section 3.2.8.3.14 of the LDC. 4.9 Native Vegetation The project will meet the native vegetation requirements of Division 3.9, Vegetation Removal, Protection and Preservation of the LDC for the subject property. 4.10 Open Space Open space may be in the form of landscaping, additional buffers, passive or active recreation areas and water management facilities. The total aggregate of such open space areas shall meet or exceed the open space requirements of Subsection. 2.6.32.3 of the LDC, which requires a minimum of thirty (30) percent for commercial developments. A majority of the open space area for the project is provided in the 8.5 acre Preserve Area, Parcel D. 4.11 Archaeological Resources The developer shall be subject to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the LDC pertaining to archaeological resources in the event that they are contained on the property. -6- 4.12 4.13 4.14 Common Area Maintenance Common Area Maintenance, including the maintenance of common facilities, open spaces, and water management facilities shall be the responsibility of a homeowners' association to be established by the developer. Architectural and Site Design Standards All development within the Lawmetka Plaza PUD shall be subject to Division 2.8 of the LDC and architectural considerations shall be unified for each tract including building design, landscaping, and signage. However, as an alternative to the requirement of Section 2.8.3.1.4(b) of the LDC, parking for comer lots that require a specified percentage of the required parking to be located behind the entire commercial building or project, this requirement shall be waived if the U.S. 41 and Wiggins Pass street frontages are developed with out parcels along the entirety of these street frontages or where there are gaps between out parcels, a type "B" buffer shall be provided along the street frontage to screen proposed parking areas from view. The north wall of any structure, including walls and building facades on Parcel C, shall at a minimum be stuccoed and painted, or otherwise be an architecturally finished opaque masonry wall, however, no north wall shall be painted concrete block as its final finish. The development of the first tract will set the standards for other development areas, unless architectural guidelines are established in advance of development of the first tract in the form of deed restrictions or other measures acceptable to Collier County. Signs All signage shall be in conformance with Division 2.5 of the LDC; however, platted interior tracts are permitted two (2) ground signs at the tract entrance, not to exceed a total of one hundred and twenty (120) feet at each tract entrance. 4.15 Parking All development shall be subject to Division 2.3 of the LDC, Off-Street Parking and Loading. 4.16 Landscaping All landscaping shall be in conformance with Division 2.4 of the LDC. 4.17 Utility Areas Utility areas, including trash receptacles, shall be completely screened from the view of customers and adjacent property owners to a height of 6 feet above finished grade. F:XPUD DocumentsXLawmetka5.doc 7 5.1 5.2 5.3 SECTION V Permitted Uses and Dimensional Standards for Tracts A and B Purpose The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for Tracts A and B within the Lawmetka Plaza PUD designated for commercial development on the PUD Master Plan, Exhibit "A". Development Intensity A maximum of two hundred and seventy_thousand (270,000) square feet of floor area is allowed for permitted retail and office uses and all other uses on Lawmetka Plaza PUD Parcels A, B and C, or subdivisions thereof, with the exception of hotel and motel uses governed by the following standards. Hotel/motel uses may be developed at twenty-six (26) dwelling units per acre on Tract A. In calculating the number of Hotel/Motel units, all or a portion of the Preservation Area on Parcel D may be utilized, however, the maximum number of hotel/motel units will not exceed one hundred and thirty (130) units. General Description The PUD Master Plan designates the following uses for each tract designated on the PUD Master Plan. TRACT ACRES HEIGHT USE A 16.4 50~ Retail, Office, Hotel/Motel B 2.7 35 ~ Retail or Office C 4.9 35 ~ Retail or Office2 D 8.5 N.A. Preservation Area ROAD 1.5 N.A. Road TOTAL 34 Architectural_embellishments are permitted above the height of thirty-five (35) feet to a maximum height of fifty (50) feet. Other uses are also permitted on Tract C. (See Section VI of this Ordinance.) The approximate acreage of commercial tracts is depicted on the PUD Master Plan. Actual acreage of all development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with Article 3, Division 3.3, and Division 3.2, respectively, of the Collier County Land Development Code. All tracts are designed to accommodate internal F:~PUD Documents~Lawmetka5. doc -8- 5.4 5.5 5.6 roadways, open spaces, water management facilities, and other similar uses to support non- residential development of the subject property. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: Permitted commercial and conditional uses allowed in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate District, in effect on the date of adoption of this Ordinance, excluding Homeless Shelters and Soup Kitchens. Permitted commercial and conditional uses in the C-4, General Commercial District in effect on the date of adoption of this Ordinance with the exception of the following uses: Bottle Clubs (all of group 5813, except bottle clubs); Fuel Dealers (groups 5983 - 5989); Automotive repair services, parking (groups 7514, 7515,7521); Amusement and recreational services, outdoor (all groups); Homeless Shelters, Soup Kitchens, Justice, Public Order and Safety (groups 9222-9224); Communication Towers above height of 100 feet Mean Sea Level, subject to Section 2.2.6.35 of the LDC, Flea Markets, Recycling Activities except as may be required by the County, Outside Kennels, Tattoo or Massage Parlors, and Agricultural Services (groups 0711-0783). Permitted Accessory_ Uses and Structures No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, on land, in whole or part, for other than the following: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the above permitted commercial principal uses and structures. Dimensional Requirements A. Minimum Lot Area Twenty thousand (20,000) square feet B. Minimum Lot Width One hundred (100) square feet F:LPUD Documents~Lawmetka5.doc -9- Co Fo Jo Minimum Yard Requirements 1. From project perimeter boundary lines - thirty-five (35) feet. From intemal tract boundary lines - twenty (20) feet. 2. Distance between principal structures shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet or one-half (1/2) the sum of the heights of the two buildings, whichever is greater. Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structure 1000 square feet per building on the ground floor, except that freestanding specialty structures of nationally recognized standard size less than 1000 square feet shall be permitted when site plan approval has been received. Maximum Height Fifty (50) feet above finished grade for Tract A and thirty-five (35) feet above finished grade for Tract B. Minimum Off-Street Parking and Off-Street Loading Requirements As required by Division 2.3 of the LDC. Minimum Landscaping Requirements As required by Division 2.4 of the LDC. Merchandise Storage and Display Unless specifically associated with a certain use, there shall be no outside storage or display of merchandise. Hotel/Motel Use Should hotel/motel uses develop on Tract A, such uses shall be subject to the requirements of Section 5.2, Development Intensity, of this Ordinance. Design Guidelines For all development tracts, the total maximum floor area for a single business establishment, either free-standing or located within a building with other establishments shall be sixty-five thousand (65,000) square feet of gross leaseable floor area. The development shall be designed so that glare from lighting shall not penetrate adjoining properties. All fixtures shall be designed such that the actual lighting element shall not be F:LPUD Documents\Lawmetka5.doc -10- visible from adjoining properties. All mechanical equipment shall be enclosed or shielded by a visual and noise absorbing barrier when placed on the north or west side of the structure to which it is attached including roof mounted mechanical equipment. For any use involving the placement of vehicles, including but not limited to parking lots, internal circulation areas, and loading areas, adjacent to buffers areas, a minimum of four (4) feet tall opaque vegetative hedge shall be installed to eliminate headlights shining into and across the buffer area. F:XPUD Documents~Lawmetka5.doc -11- SECTION VI Permitted Uses and Dimensional Requirements for Tract C 6.1 6.2 6.3 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the permitted uses and land development regulations for Tract C designated on the PUD Master Plan, along with other permitted uses. USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Homes for the Aged Hospices Adult/child care centers Convalescent centers Nursing Homes Rest homes Sanitariums Adult Congregate Living Facility Retail or office uses as permitted by Section 5.4 of that Ordinance, excluding free- standing cocktail lounge B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this District. C. Permitted Uses No accessway between the northernmost principal building and the north property line shall permit any deliveries, shipping or stopping between 8 p.m. to 6 a.m., and the accessway shall be so posted. DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. Minimum Lot Area One (1) acre F:\PUD Documents\Lawmetka5.doc - 12- Bo Eo '"8B ""I Minimum Lot Width One hundred (100) feet Minimum Yard Requirements The following building setbacks shall apply: From eastern property line - thirty-five (35) feet. From northern property line - seventy (70) feet (inclusive of 40 foot Florida Department of Transportation drainage easement). From internal tract boundary lines - twenty (20) feet. Distance between principal structures shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet or one-half the sum of the heights of the two buildings, whichever is greater. Maximum Height Three stories not to exceed thirty five (35) feet, however, architectural embellishments may be extended above the thirty-five height limitation to a maximum height of fifty (50) feet. Minimum Off-Street Parking and Off-Street Loading Requirements As required by Division 2.3 of the LDC. Minimum Landscaping and Buffering Requirements 1. For the east, west, and south property lines as required by Division 2.4 of the LDC. For the northern property line, the owner of Parcel C shall maintain a fifteen (15) foot landscape buffer as measured from the southern edge of the Florida Department of Transportation drainage easement. An architecturally finished opaque masonry wall a minimum of six (6) feet in height shall be installed within the buffer area and shall be located along the southern part of the buffer area. This buffer shall be installed as a required improvement for the first Site Development Plan within the PUD. To the greatest extent, practical the existing native vegetation shall be retained within the buffer area and the Florida Department of Transportation drainage easement, and where not practical within the buffer area, trees no more than twenty-five (25) feet on center or a hedge no more than four (4) feet on center, or a combination thereof shall be planted on the northern side of the wall. Any new trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height with a three (3) foot spread at the time of installation. Any hedge shall consist of a minimum often (10) gallon plants, five (5) feet in height with a three (3) foot spread at time of installation. Except to the extent of any conflict with the foregoing requirement, all of the Landscaping and Buffering requirements of Division 2.4 of the LDC shall also apply to Parcel C, in the event of a conflict F:LPUD Documents~LawmetkaS.doc -13- between the Landscaping and Buffering requirements of this Section and those of the LDC, the more restrictive shall apply. G. Design Guidelines In accordance with the requirements of Section 5.6J of this Ordinance. F:~UD Documents~Lawmetka5.doc - 14- SECTION VII Environmental Standards The purpose of this Section is to set forth the Environmental Standards of the project developer. 7.1 An 8.4 acre upland and wetland Preserve Area is located along the western portion of the subject property and is permitted to be used for open space and passive recreational use only. All preservation areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation tracts or easements on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Buffers shall be provided in accordance with Subsection 3.2.8.4.7.3 of the LDC. 7.2 A Gopher Tortoise relocation plan shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. Any standards approved by the Environmental Staff shall be added to the site development plan or construction plans. Off-site relocation may be required if the applicant cannot provide adequate habitat for on-site relocation. 7.3 The petitioner shall be subject to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Policy 12.1.3 contained in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (discovery of a archaeological or historical site, artifact or other indicator of preservation). 7.4 7.5 7.6 Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the state of Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules and be subject to review and approval by Current Planning Environmental Review Staff. Removal of exotic vegetation shall not be counted towards mitigation for impacts to Collier County jurisdictional wetlands. Buffers shall be provided around wetlands, extending at least fifteen (15) feet landward from the edge of wetland preserves in all places and averaging twenty-five (25) feet from the landward edge of wetlands. Where natural buffers are not possible, structural buffers shall be provided in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resources Permit Rules and be subject to review and approval by Current Planning Environmental Staff. Native vegetation preservation shall conform to the requirements of Subsection 3.9.5.5.4 of the Collier County LDC. The Preserve Areas shall be generally provided for as depicted on the PUD Master Plan, Exhibit A. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance (exotic free) plan for the site, with emphasis on the preservation area, shall be submitted to the Current Planning Environmental Review Staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan/Construction Approval. A schedule for exotic removal within all Preservation Areas shall be submitted with the above- referenced plan. F:~UD Documents~Lawmetka5.doc -15- 7.7 The petitioner shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Conservation Commission (FGFWFCC) regarding potential impacts to protected wildlife species. Where protected, species are observed on site, a habitat management plan for these protected species shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan/Construction Approval. F:~UD Documents~Lawmetka5.doc - 16- SECTION VIII Transportation Requirements The purpose of this Section is to set forth the transportation standards of the project developer. 8.1 Subject to Florida Department of Transportation approval, the developer shall provide left and right turn lanes on Tamiami Trail at both project entrances at the time of a certificate of occupancy for the first structure with access to US 41. Should any of the required turn lanes be constructed due to other development activity in the area prior to completion of this project, the developer shall provide a fair share reimbursement of the cost of such construction prior to final site plan approval. The Florida Department of Transportation and Collier County Transportation Department each reserve the right to control median openings, both existing and future, and to limit access points to right tums in and right tums out. 8.2 The developer shall provide left and right turn lanes on Wiggins Pass Road at the project's two entrances at the time of the certificate of occupancy for the first structure requiring access from Wiggins Pass Road. 8.3 All road access points requiring turn lanes and use of existing right-of-way shall provide for compensating right-of-way dedication at the time of subdivision plat or site plan approval. 8.4 Existing drainage easements, future drainage easements, and planned preserve areas shall remain available to Collier County and Florida Department of Transportation for future roadway water management purposes subject to appropriate capacity controls and operating controls. The responsibility for maintenance of such areas shall remain with the developer/owner and/or its assignees. 8.5 The northern access on Tamiami Trail shall be in alignment with Old U.S. 41 (CR 887). The developer shall be responsible for any and all costs incurred in modifying the traffic signal installation at Old U.S. 41 so as to accommodate the project. 8.6 The road impact fees shall be in accordance with the fee structure set forth in Ordinance 2001-13 or as may be amended and shall be paid at the time building permits are issued unless otherwise approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 8.7 All required access improvements shall be in place before any certificates of occupancy are issued and shall not be subject to impact fee credits. 8.8 All traffic control devices used shall conform to requirements of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as required by Chapter 316.0747, Florida Statutes. 8.9 Internal roadways shall be public or private at the option of the developer. -17- F:~PUD Documents~Lawmetka5. doc SECTION IX Utility and Engineering Requirements The purpose of this Section is to set forth the utilities and engineering commitments of the project developer. 9.1 Utilities 9.2 Ao Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. Bo All customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage collection facilities to be constructed will be customers of the County and will be billed by the County in accordance with the County's established rates. Should the County not be in a position to provide sewer service to the project, the sewer customers shall be customers of the interim utility established to serve the project until the County's off-site sewer facilities are available to serve the project. Co Prior to approval of construction documents by the County, the developer must present verification, pursuant to Chapter 367, Florida Statutes, that the Florida Public Service Commission has granted territorial rights to the developer to provide sewer service to the project until the County can provide these services through its sewer facilities. The utility construction documents for the project's sewerage system shall contain the design and construction of an onsite force main, which will ultimately connect the project to the future central sewerage facilities of Collier County. The force main must be interconnected to the pump station with appropriately located valves to permit for simple redirection of the project's sewage, when connection to the County's central sewer facilities becomes available. Prior to or at the time of submission of construction plans and final plat for the project, the potable water supply from the Collier County Water-Sewer District to serve this project shall be installed adjacent to the property and be in service. Engineering mo Detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to the Development Services Department for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans are approved by the Development Services Department. B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be in compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County LDC. F:~PUD DocumentsXLawmetka5.doc -18- SECTION X Water Management Requirements The purpose of this Section is to set forth the water management commitments of the project developer. 10.1 Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County LDC, except that excavation for water management features shall be allowed within twenty (20) feet from side, rear or abutting property lines as long as the side, rear or abutting property lines are fenced. 10.2 Landscaping may be placed within the water management area in compliance with the criteria established within Section 2.4.7.3 of the LDC. 10.3 The wet season water table elevation shall be established at the time of South Florida Water Management District permitting, which is required for the subject property. 10.4 One half (1/2) inch of dry pretreatment shall precede the discharge of any stormwater into the preservation area or whatever alternate conditions may be incorporated into the South Florida Water Management District permitting requirements. 10.5 The stormwater system shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County Public Works Engineering Department (PWED) in order to verify its consistency with the Wiggins Pass Outfall Project now being designed by PWED. W:~001 ~2001126\RID\PUD-ORIGINAL 08-2002.doc FSPUD Documents'~Lawmetka5.doc - 19- EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of the southeast ¼ of the northeast ¼ of Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida,, STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2002-51 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 8th day of October, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this llth day of October, 2002. DWIGHT E BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk.~,~?~ Ex-officio to Board of' County Commissioners By: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: [] Normal legal Advertisement [] Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dept/Div: Fire Code Official's Office Person: Ed Riley, Fire Code Official Date: 09/20/2002 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Code Ordinance Petitioner: (Name & Address): N/A Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Linde Rutkoski, 2780 S. Horseshoe Dr., Ste. 3, Naples, FL 34104 Hearing before × BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appearing 10 days before hearing.) October 8, 2002 Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): [] Naples Daily News [] Other [] Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: ORDINANCE'NO. 2002- Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: N/A Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? [] Yes [] No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: Fire Code Official's Office, 2780 S Horseshoe Dr., Suite3, Naples, FL 34104 P.O. #01001M2 Reviewed by: Ed Riley, Fire Code Official Division Administrator or Designee September 20,2002 Date List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS Ao For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda f'fle: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLE~'S OFFICE USE ~LY~~ /~~ ~ Date Received: ~/~ Date of Public hea~g: Date Adve~ised: September 20, 2002 Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Readopting Collier County's Fire Prevention and Protection Code Dear Georgia: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Frid&y, September 27, 2002 and send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, to this office. Kindly forward charges to the Fire Code Official's Office at 2780 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 3, Naples, FL 34104. Thank you. Sincerely, Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Purchase Order #0100042 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Harmon Turner Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE READOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION CODE BY AMENDING THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 58, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION, ARTICLE II, FIRE SAFETY STANDARDS FOR THE UNINCORPOP~ATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, BY REPLACING SECTION 58- 26, PERTAINING TO ADOPTED STANDARDS AND CODES OF THE NATIONAL FIRE CODES PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA); REPLACING SECTION 58-27, PERTAINING TO AMENDMENTS TO ADOPTED FIRE CODES, SPECIFICALLY NFPA 1, 2002 EDITION; REPLACING SECTION 58-28, PERTAINING TO AMENDMENTS TO THE ADOPTED LIFE SAFETY CODE, SPECIFICALLY NFPA 101, 2002 EDITION; RESERVING SECTION 58-29; REPEALING CERTAIN.ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR THE INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. Ail material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk ( SEAL ) ORDINANCE NO. 2002- AN ORDINANCE READOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION CODE BY AMENDING THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 58, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION, ARTICLE II, FIRE SAFETY STANDARDS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, BY REPLACING SECTION 58-26, PERTAINING TO ADOPTED STANDARDS AND CODES OF THE NATIONAL FIRE CODES PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA); REPLACING SECTION 58-27, PERTAINING TO AMENDMENTS TO ADOPTED FIRE CODES, SPECIFICALLY NFPA 1, 2002 EDITION; REPLACING SECTION 58-28, PERTAINING TO AMENDMENTS TO THE ADOPTED LIFE SAFETY CODE, SPECIFICALLY NFPA 101, 2002 EDITION; RESERVING SECTION 58-29; REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR THE INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (Board) has fire safety responsibilities for Collier County; and WHEREAS, Section 633.025, Florida Statutes, subsection (1) establishes the Florida Fire Prevention Code and the Life Safety Code as the state minimum code; and WHEREAS, Section 633.025, Florida Statutes, subsection (4) enables a county with fire safety responsibilities to adopt more stringent fire safety standards or alternative requirements where, as here, a determination has been made that there is a need to strengthen the requirements of the minimum fire safety code adopted and enforced by Collier County; and WHEREAS, the Board hereby determines upon its review of local conditions - which review demonstrates that local conditions justify more stringent requirements than those specified in the minimum fire and life safety code for the protection of life and property or justify requirements that meet special situations arising from historic, geographic, or unusual conditions - that local amendments to the statewide minimum code are needed and will serve a public purpose; and WHEREAS, by operation of certain statutory provisions the previously existing local amendments to then existing fire and life safety code provisions then in effect have been replaced by the statewide minimum code making appropriate the repeal of no longer effective local ordinances comprising Article II of Chapter 58 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 633.025, subsection (4)(a) a properly advertised public hearing was held and all interested persons were afforded the opportunity to provide any comments; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to update the Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Code to reflect the foregoing matters; and WHEREAS, the amendments to the statewide minimum code set forth below are essential to maintain an established and effective level of fire prevention and protection. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The text of the following sections of Chapter 58 of Article II, of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, are replaced with the text which follows: Sec. 58-26. Collier County Fire Protection and Prevention Code Adopted. The standards and Code sections of the "National Fire Codes", as published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), as adopted by the rules of the Division of the State Fire Marshal section 4A-3.012, 4A-60.005 or referenced by the 2000 edition of NFPA 1 or NFPA 101 and those listed below by standard number and edition and as amended herein, are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of the "Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Code," intended to protect the health, safety, common interest, and convenience of the citizens, visitors, and residents of Collier County, Florida. NFPA Code Standard Edition 18 1995 42 1997 50A 1999 70E 2000 79 1997 97 2000 170 1999 412 1998 423 1999 513 1998 560 1995 600 2000 601 2000 801 1998 901 2001 1961 1997 1964 1998 Description Wetting Agents Storage of PyroxyBn Plastic Gaseous Hydrogen Systems Electrical Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces Electrical Standard for Industrial Machinery Glossary of Terms Relating to Chimneys and Vents Fire Safety Symbols Evaluating Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Foam Equip. Const. and Protection of Aircraft Engine Test Facilities Motor Freight Terminals Storage, Handling and Use of Ethylene Oxide Industrial Fire Brigades Security Service in Fire Loss Prevention Facilities Handling Radioactive Materials Standard Classi. fications for Incident Reporting Fire Hose Spray Nozzles Sec. 58-27. Amendments to Fire Codes. The 'q',lational Fire Codes, NFPA 1, Fire Prevention Code, 2000 Edition," is hereby amended by local amendment as follows: 8C (A) CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT (1) BOARD OF APPEALS i) Strike all existing text and amend 1-8 to read as follows: 1-8 BOARD OF APPEALS Will operate and be comprised as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code, Division 5.4, except that the Collier County Fire Marshal's Association may recommend those two members one of whom would be an architect or engineer and one whom must be a fire protection specialist for consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. (2) NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS, PENALTIES i) Amend 1-19.3 to read as follows; 1-19-3 Any person who fails to comply with the provisions of this code or who fails to carry out an order made pursuant of this code or violates any condition attached to a permit, approval, or certificate shall be subject to the penalties established by this jurisdiction. Nothing herein contained is intended to prevent the Independent Fire Districts of Collier County from taking such other lawful action in any court of competent jurisdiction as the District deems necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. Such other lawful action shall include, but shall not be limited to, any equitable action for injunctive relief or action at. law for damages. The Independent Fire Districts of Collier County shall have the power to enforce the provisions of this Code and ordinances by means of the Collier County Code Enforcement Boards. (B) CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT (1) APPLICATION i) Amend subsection 1-5.2 to read as follows: 1-5.2 Details regarding prpcesses, methods, specifications, equipment testing and maintenance, design standards, performance, installation, or other pertinent criteria contained in those standards and codes listed in Chapter 32 of this Code and those adopted pursuant to the Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Code Section 58-26 shall be considered a part of this code. ii) Amend Subsection 1-5.5 to read as follows: 1-5.5 Buildings in existence or permitted for construction prior to the adoption of this Code shall comply with the provisions stated herein or referenced for existing buildings Existing buildings or installations that do not comply with the provisions of the publications referenced in 1-5.2 shall be permitted to be continued in use, unless the authority having jurisdiction determines that the lack of conformity with these standards presents an imminent danger. Exception: A limited but reasonable time shall be allowed for compliance with any part of this Code for existing buildings, commensurate with the magnitude of expenditure, disruption of services, and degree of hazard. Occupied existing buildings shall comply with 1-9.2. (2) OCCUPANCY i) Amend Subsection 1-9.1 to read as follows: 1-9.1 No new construction or existing building shall be occupied in whole or in part in violation of the provisions of this Code or other applicable Collier County laws and ordinances. All tenants and occupants shall obtain a "Notice of Fire Compliance" certificate from the appropriate fire district prior to the occupancy and .use of a new or existing building as evidence of compliance with the Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Code. Such original certificate shall be displayed in a prominent location within the structure, building, or portion thereof. Exception: Occupants of one and two family dwellings and residential tenants in multi-family buildings are exempt from the requirement of obtaining a "Notice of Fire Compliance". (3) PERMITS AND APPROVALS i) Amend Subsection 1-16.16(3) to read as follows: Bonfires and Outdoor Rubbish Fires. Kindling or maintaining any open fire or a fire in any public street, alley, road, or other public or private ground. Instructions and stipulations of permit shall be adhered to. Cooking fires and small recreational fires not intended for vegetation or rubbish disposal, when conducted safely and on the property of the subject are exempt and do not require a permit. ii) Not withstanding the above provisions, for 30 days commencing with the declaration of a state of emergency by the Governor of the State of Florida, because of extended drought and the resulting potential for wildfires, which includes all or parts of Collier County, there shall become effective a prohibition against kindling, creating or maintaining any .campfire, bonfire, open or barrel burning of trash, discarding of 4 lighted smoking materials outdoors, smoking in county parks, and the sale or use of fireworks. The use of open barbecues or barbecue pits utilizing charcoal or wood shall be prohibited within 600 yards of any forest, grassland, woods, wild lands or marsh area within Collier County. The prohibitions expressly provided herein may be extended by resolution duly adopted by the board. (4) PLANS REVIEW i) Amend Subsection 18.2 to read as follows: 1-18.2 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that: (1) The construction documents include all of the fire protection requirements (2) The shop drawings are correct and in compliance with the applicable codes and standards (3) All plans for proposed new structures and square footage additions to existing structures include 8 and ½ x 11 page or pages entitled "Fire Protection Plan" that depict the following: (a) Completed form titled "Collier County Fire Districts Pre-Incident Planning Data". Form must be completely filled out, indicating N/A where not applicable. (b) Use of Uniform Drawing Symbols and Legend as published in NFPA 170, Standard for Fire Safety Symbols (particularly chapters 5 & 6) 1999 Edition: Copyright National Fire Protection Association. (c) North arrow. (d) Overall building dimensions. To scale site plan showing the entire property boundaries, entire structural footprint, all building entrance openings, exit stairs, pavement areas and fire lanes, fire hydrants, adjacent roadways with names, and distances to all fire hydrants within 1000 fi (304.8m) measured along the centerline of the street, driveway or fire lane. (f) Florida Building Code Construction Type. (g) Number of stories of structure and total square footage under roof per story. (h) A wall detail/section from foundation through the roof illustrating the predominant or typical floor(s), wall(s) and roof materials. Such detail/section shall be keyed with a call mark on the structural footprint required (a) above. (i) Needed fire flow as required by section 7-5.1.1. (j) Fire district water supply flow test(s) as required by section 7- 5.1.5. (k) Main utility (electric, gas, water, etc,) shutoff locations. (1) Hazardous and/or combustible materials locations and estimated quantities. (m)Locations of features of fire protection systems (fire department connections, fire sprinkler shut-off, fire alarm panels, standpipes etc.) Exception 1: Group R-3. One and Two-family Residences. Exception 2: Ancillary structures like guardhouses, restrooms etc. Not exceeding 1000 square feet in area. Exception 3: Square footage additions that do not exceed 1000 square feet. (5) COST OF PERMIT (i) Add Section 1-21 to read as follows: 1-21 COST OF PERMIT Refer to Collier County Resolution No. 01-313, (establishing fees), Exhibit B (C) CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS (1) DEFINITIONS (i) Add the following definitions to read as follows: 2-1.166 Fire Marshal - The Fire Chief or his/her designee within each independent fire district or the Collier County manager or his/her designee within any dependant fire district within Collier County. 2-1.167 Fire Official- The individual appointed by the FIRE DISTRICTS and employed by the Administrative District who is responsible for the fire plan review office. 2-1.168 Owner- Any person or entity having a legal or equitable interest in the property. 2-1.169 Interlocal agreement- An agreement entered into between the board of County Commissioners and any Independent Fire District(s). 2-1.170 Manual Wet Standpipe- Refer to NFPA 14:3-2.5 2-1.171 Residential Occupancy (Group R) - Refer to the Florida Building Code, 2000 Edition for the definition and sub-classification, or its successor. (ii) Amend 2-1.67 to read as follows; 2-1.67 Fire lane means any driveway, road, or unobstructed area, which may be used by the fire 6 department for the movement of fire vehicles or firefighting operations. (D) CHAPTER 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS (1) OPEN OUTDOOR FIRES, INCINERATORS, OUTDOOR FIREPLACES. i) Amend Subsection 3-4.1 to read as follows: 3-4.1 Permits. Permits are required and shall comply with Section 1-16. Exception; Cooking fires and small recreational fires not intended for vegetation or rubbish disposal when conducted safely and on the property of the subject. Notwithstanding the above provisions, for 30 days commencing with the declaration of a state of emergency by the Governor of the State of Florida, because of extended drought and the resulting potential for wildfires, which includes all or parts of Collier County, there shall become effective a prohibition against kindling, creating or maintaining any campfire, bonfire, open or barrel burning of trash, discarding of lighted smoking materials outdoors, smoking in county parks, and the sale or use of fireworks. The use of open barbecues or barbecue pits utilizing charcoal or wood shall be prohibited within 600 yards of any forest, grassland, woods, wild lands or marsh area within Collier County. The prohibitions expressly provided herein may be extended by resolution duly adopted by the board ii) Amend Subsection 3-4.7 to read as follows: 3-4.7 No charcoal burners shall be kindled or maintained on balconies or within 10 feet of any structure. Exception: Single-family dwellings. iii) 3-4.8 No gas-fired cooking grill shall be kindled or maintained on balconies or within 10 feet of any structure. LP gas cylinders in excess of 21/2 lbs, water weight shall not be,stored within 10 f~ of a residential building. Exception: Single-family dwellings. (2) Vlm [At,rES i) Amend Subsection 3-5.2 to read as follows; 3-5.2 All buildings that a fire department may be called to protect that are not readily accessible to an adjacent local street shall be provided with a suitable fire lane or parallel access drive unless the analysis of the fire official indicates the fire access is unnecessary. Such fire access is necessary for all buildings three (3) or more stories in height which are not adjacent to a local street. (a) Parking spaces adjacent to structures that, in the opinion of the fire official, may hinder or delay firefighting forces in the performance of their duties are prohibited. Limited designated parking spaces may be approved by the fire official when alternative arrangements are made prior to construction, which must include automatic fire suppression systems. (b) The fire official may require additional fire lanes around commercial buildings when his or her analysis indicates additional access to the building is needed. (c) No new wet or dry retention or detention areas shall be located directly adjacent to any structure unless prior approval is received from the fire official. ii) Add subsection 3-5.2.1 to read as follows; 3-5.2.1 Fire lanes shall be not less than 20 fi (6m) of unobstructed width, able to with stand live loads of fire apparatus, and have a minimum of 14 fi vertical clearance. Turning radii for fire lanes not exceeding a 90 degree turn where serving buildings shall be 25 fi inside and 49 fi outside and turning radii for fire lanes serving parking lots only shall be 25 R inside and 45 fi outside. Where turns exceed 90 degrees the standards for turnarounds shall apply. An approved turn around for fire apparatus shall be provided where an access road is a dead end and in excess of 150 fi (46m) in length. The turnaround shall have a minimum centerline radius of 40 feet (12.7m). The grade surface and location of the fire lane shall be approved by the authority having jurisdiction. At least one elevation of each building shall be accessible to the fire department. Required fire lanes shall be provided with the inner edge of the roadway no closer than 10 feet and no farther than 30 feet from the building. Such lanes shall have a surface designed to accommodate fire apparatus with a minimum weight of 32 tons. Exception No. 1: Adequacy of emergency vehicle access shall be determined by the authority having jurisdiction. Exception No. 2: T or Y turnaround arrangements shall be permitted. Exception No. 3: - When acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction, turnaround arrangements other than a cul-de-sac shall be permitted to be used. iii) Add Subsection 3-5.5.1 to read as follows: 3-5.5.1 EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS 3-5.5.1 This section is intended to apply to all gate installations EXCEPT those serving individual single-family residences. iv) Add Subsection 3-5.5.1.1 to read as follows: 3-5.5.1.1 All electronic access control gate to structures and properties that may require emergency services that restrict the free ingress and egress of emergency vehicles and are not constantly attended 24 hours per day shall be provided with an electronic transmitter/receiver system capable of being programmed with a unique activation code and frequency approved by the authority having jurisdiction. Such code or frequency shall not be used by or provided to other gate users. Existing installations shall comply within 180 days subsequent to the notification date by the authority having jurisdiction. v) Add Subsection 3-5.5.2.3 to read as follows; 3-5.5.2.3 All electronic access control gates under section 3-5.5.1.1 shall be compatible with the uniform county -wide transmitters. Said transmitters are carried only within emergency services vehicles. vi) Add Subsection 3-5.5.2.4 to read as follows; 3-5.5.2.4 All electronic access control gates shall have a battery backup with a fail safe override. Exception No. 1 - Any other override system acceptable to the Authority having jurisdiction. Exception No. 2 - Gates serving individual single-family residences. vii) Add Subsection 3-5.5.2.5 to read as follows; 3-5.5.2.5 All non-electronic access control gates to structures and properties that may require emergency services that restrict the free ingress and egress of emergency vehicles and are not constantly attended 24 hours a day shall be provided with a key box per section 3-6. Exception No. 1 - Gates serving individual single-family residences. viii) Add Subsection 3-5.5.2.6 to read as follows; 3-5.5.2.6 All electronic gates are required to receive a building permit with fire review prior to installation. ix) Amend Subsection 3-5.6.2. lto read as follows; 3-5.6.2.1 Hydrants. Clearance of 3 feet to the rear and sides of fire hydrants and clear to the street. No new wet or dry retention or detention areas shall be located between the fire hydrant and the fire access area unless prior approval is received from the fire official. x) Amend Subsection 3-5.6.2.2 to read as follows; 3-5.6.2.2 Fire Protection Appliances. Clearance of 3 feet to sides and clear to the street. No new wet or dry retention or detention areas shall be located between the fire appliance and the fire access area unless prior approval is received from the fire official. (3) PUBLIC ASSEMBLAGES AND EVENTS i) Add section 3-10.7 to rear as follows; 3-10.7 Public Assemblages and Events ii) Add subsection 3-10.7.1 to read as follows; Where the authority having jurisdiction determines that the gathering of persons in a structure or outside of a structure or the nature of the performance, exhibition, display, contest, or activity presents or is predicted to present unusual and significant impact on public safety, including access to buildings, structures, fire hydrants, fire lanes, and the like, or other provisions of public safety services, including fire protection and emergency medical services, the authority having jurisdiction shall have the authority to order the development of or prescribe a plan for the provision of safety services which provides a reasonable degree of safety for the attendees, participants and other affected members of the public. iii) Add Subsection 3-10.7.2 to read as follows; 10 3-10.7.2 The plan shall address such items as emergency vehicle ingress and egress, fire protection, emergency medical services, fire and safety inspections, public assembly areas and the directing of attendees and vehicles, vendor and food concession distribution, and the need for the presence of law enforcement, fire, and medical services personnel at the event. Said plan shall be submitted to the authority having jurisdiction a minimum of two weeks prior to the starting date of the event. iv) Add Subsection 3-10.7.3 to read as follows; 3-10.7.3 The authority having jurisdiction is hereby authorized to assess and collect reasonable compensation for services rendered to public assemblages and events covered by the provisions of section 3-10.7, as it may deem necessary in accordance with the applicable service resolution of the governing body. (4) CLOTHES DRYER VENTING i) Add section 3-11 to read as follows; Venting of clothes dryers, whether electric or gas fired shall be on the floor of origin or into an approved shaft. Exception 1: Group R-3, Detached one and two-family residences. Exception 2: Other arrangements as may be approved by the authority having jurisdiction. (E) CHAPTER 7 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS i) Amend Subsection 7-2.2.2 to read as follows; Exception 1: Buildings classified as R-2, four stories in height are required to have manual wet standpipes in accordance with NFPA 14. ii) Add Subsection 7-2.2.2.1 to read as follows 7-2.2.2.1 Any building five stories or more in height and not otherwise classified as a high rise building as defined by the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition, shall have an automatic wet standpipe system in accordance with NFPA 14 capable of supplying the required gallons per minute with a residual pressure of 65 psi at the uppermost hose connection. iii) Add Subsection 7-2.2.2.2 to read as follows; 7-2.2.2.2 Any high-rise building as defined by the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition shall have an automatic wet standpipe system in 11 accordance with NFPA 14 capable of supplying the required gallons per minute with a residual pressure of 100 psi at the uppermost hose connection. iv) Add Subsection 7-2.2.2.3 to read as follows; 7-2.2.2.3 Fire department valves on standpipe systems shall not be pressure-reducing valves. Pressure restricting devices shall be installed on any valve with pressure in excess of 175 psi. Pressure restricting devices shall be so as to be readily removable, leaving hose threads acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction. v) Add Subsection 7-2.2.2.4 to read as follows; 7-2.2.2.4 All fire department connections, other than those serving a high rise building, shall be located within 50 fi (15.25m) of a fire hydrant and within 50 fi (15.25m) of a fire department vehicle access road. Exception 1: Fire department connections supplying fire sprinkler systems in accordance with NFPA 13R that are not a part of a standpipe system. Exception 2: Actual locations of fire department connections shall be as approved by the authority having jurisdiction. vi) Add Subsection 7-2.2.2.5 to read as follows; 7-2.2.2.5 New high-rise buildings shall be equipped with two fire department connections. One connection shall be located at the building and one shall be located within 15 t~ (4.6m) of a fire hydrant. Either fire department connection shall be capable of operating independently of the other. The second fire department connection required at the building shall not be required to be located within 50 ft (15.25m) ora fire hydrant. vii) Add subsection 7-3.1.1. to read as follows: 7-3.1.1. Automatic sprinklers shall be installed and maintained in full operating condition, as specified for the occupancy involved in the codes or standards listed in Chapter 32. Installations shall be in accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems; NFPA 13R, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Residential Occupancies up to and Including Four Stories in Height; or NFPA 13D, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One and Two Family Dwellings and Manufactured Homes, as appropriate. 12 viii) ix) 7-3.2.2.1 All fire sprinkler systems shall be designed with hydraulic calculation method. System design will be based on a current flow test. For flow tests with a static pressure of 55 PSI or more the test will be extrapolated to seasonal static of 50 PSI.i The formula is as follows: X Factor = Seasonal Static / Measured Static Design Res. Pres. = (Residual Pres) x (X Factor) Design Pitot PSI = (Pitot Press) x (Xfactor) For flow tests with a static of less than 50 PSI the un-extrapolated flow test shall be used. However in this case a minimum safety factor of 5 psi above the demand point of the system shall .be used. Fire flow data shall be attached to the hydraulic calculations as per section 7-5.1.1. Add to Section 7-3.2.2 to read as follows: Automatic fire extinguishing systems shall be provided, in accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, when required by this Code, or referenced codes and standards listed in Chapter 32; and in all new residential occupancies containing more than four (4) living units; and when otherwise required by Collier County. Exception No. 1: Residential occupancies up to four (4) stories in height may be protected in accordance with NFPA 13R, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Residential Occupancies up to and Including Four Stories in Height, where not otherwise required to be protected by sprinklers pursuant to the Building Code or other applicable standards. Add subsection 7-3.2.2.1, to read as follows; All Automatic fire extinguishing systems, installed voluntarily, arbitrarily or otherwise, shall provide an adequate means (stub-out) for future fire sprinkler protection on lanais, balconies and canopies in residential occupancies. Amend subsection 7-3.4.2 to eliminate (2),(3) and (4). And add two exceptions to the existing exception as follows: Exception No 2: 13D systems in one and two family dwellings. Exception No 3: Sprinkler piping serving not more than six sprinklers connected directly to a domestic 13 water supply system. However the control valve shall be locked in the open position. xi) Add Subsection 7-5.1.1 to read as follows; 7-5.1.1 The following are fire flow requirements for new construction, changes in occupancy or use to a more hazardous classification (according to National Fire Protection Association 101, 2000 edition) or any physical enlargement of existing buildings. All one and two family dwellings are exempt form these requirements except new subdivisions as provided for in (1) a below: New exclusive one and two family subdivisions: Building Square Footage Min. Fire Flow (GPM) Less than or equal to 5000 500 Greater than 5000 750 Subdivisions not capable of delivering the required fire flow shall provide automatic sprinkler systems in accordance with NFPA 13, 13R or 13D, 1999 editions as applicable. All other buildings shall calculate required fire flows in accordance with the following formula shown in subsection (3) below. This formula establishes a base flow from which the degree of hazard, credit for fire sprinkler protection and separation distance will result in a final needed fire flow. National Fire Protection Association 13, 1999 edition shall be used for the purpose of determining hazard classification. NFPA classification Light Ordinary I & II Extra Formula application Light Ordinary High Fire flow based on the formula NFF= [(18) x COEFFICIENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE) x { SQUARE ROOT (BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE)} x HAZARD FACTOR x EXPOSURE FACTOR x FIRE SPRINKLER FACTOR Coefficients based on construction type. 1.5 = Wood (Type VI) 1.0 = Ordinary (Type V) 0.8 = Noncombustible (Type III & IV) 0.6 = * Fire resistive (Type I & II) Coefficient based on hazard. 0.75 = Light hazard 1.0 = Ordinary hazard 1.25 = High hazard 14 Coefficient based on exposure distance in feet. 0-10 = 1.25 11-30 = 1.2 31-60 = 1.15 61-100 = 1.1 101-150 = 1.05 >150 = 1 Coefficient based on fire sprinklers. 0.5 = Fully fire sprinklered 1 = Not fully fire sprinklered *Fire resistive construction need only be calculated on the three (3) largest successive floors of highest hazard classification. A four-hour "fire wall" may be used to reduce total square footage of a building for the purposes of fire flow requirements, providing the wall intersects each successive floor of the building and complies with NFPA 221. The minimum required fire flow for commercial and multi-family occupancies shall be 750 GPM. Owners and developers shall make provisions to install water lines and fire hydrants to meet spacing and fire flow. requirements. Where fire mains exist but do not meet the fire flow requirements, alternative arrangements may be made, prior to construction, with the authority having jurisdiction. Due to the concern for public safety, failure to meet the fire flow requirements or come to alternative agreement shall be grounds for refusal for the county to issue building permits. xii) Add Subsection 7-5.1.2 to read as follows; 7-5.1.2 Where buildings are constructed, with the furthest point of the structure being one hundred fifty (150) feet or more from a public street, requires private mains and fire hydrants which shall meet the required fire flow with spacing to be determined by the fire official, not to exceed three hundred (300) foot maximum distance between hydrants. Hydrant spacing and required fire flow may be altered by the fire official if, by prior arrangement with the fire official, automatic fire suppression systems are installed in all buildings on the premises. xiii) Add subsection 7-5.1.3 to read as follows: 7-5.1.3 Maximum distance between fire hydrants shall be five hundred (500) feet in exclusive one and two family areas with buildings not exceeding 5000 sq f~, and three hundred (300) feet in all other areas. xiv) add subsection 7-5.1.4 to read as follows: 7-5.1.4 Where buildings are proposed in an area not meeting the hydrant spacing requirements, the owner or 15 8C developer shall provide the number of hydrants prescribed by the fire official, under the terms of this section. xv) Add subsection 7-5.1.5 to read as follows: 7-5.1.5 Prior to development of new structures or fire protection systems, a fire flow test in accordance with NFPA 291 shall be preformed by the fire district having jurisdiction. Such tests shall be completed no longer than six months prior to'the submittal for permit. Calculations of the available fire flow at a minimum of 20 psi residual shall be provided on the fire protection plan required by section 1-18.2 or with the hydraulic calculation package submitted for fire protection system permits. Fire flow test reports shall be submitted on the official letterhead of the fire district having jurisdiction. xvi) Add subsection 7-5.1.6 to read as follows: 7-5.1.6 Fire hydrants shall be provided for structures in accordance with NFPA 24 and shall be distributed so that the Needed Fire Flow determined by the fire official may be delivered. Hydrant locations and distances to proposed structures shall be indicated on the Fire Protection Plan required in section 1-18.2 xvii) Add subsection 7-5.1.7 to read as follows: 7-5.1.7 Proposed single structure site developments within 1000 ft (304.8m) of existing water mains shall extend such mains so that the main sizes and hydrant locations comply with the provisions of this code. Measurement of the distance shall be along existing or proposed roads, street, driveways or fire lanes as applicable. Where no piped water supply exists within 1000 ft (304.8m) distance criteria, the requirements of NFPA 1142, Standard on Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting 1999 edition, shall apply. Proposed multi-structure site developments shall provide permanent fire protection water supply from a public or private utility system or construct a private engineered water system acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction and capable of delivering the required Needed Fire Flow specified in subsection7- 5.1.1 xviii) Add subsection 7-7.1.4 to read as follows: 7-7.1.4 All fire sprinkler systems shall be monitored by a UL listed Remote or Central station monitoring agency. Exception No 1: One and two family dwellings xix) Add subsection 7-7.1.5 to read as follows: 7-7-1.5 All fire sprinkler systems shall activate one or more monitored audio/visual device located on the exterior of the building. The number and location of the device(s) shall be approved by the authority having jurisdiction. 16 Exception: Single family dwellings (F) CHAPTER 13: COMMERCIAL COOKING EQUIPMENT (1) 13-2 PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS i) Amend subsection 13-2.3 to eliminate the exception. Sec. 58-28. Amendments to the Life Safety Code. NFPA 101 Code for Safety to Life from Fire in Buildings and Structures, 2000 Edition, is amended as follows: (A) CHAPTER 4: GENERAL i) Add new subsection 4.8, "Use of Fire and Spark Producing Devices in Public Places" to read as follows: 4.8 Use of Fire and Spark Producing Devices in Public Places. ii) Add new subsection 4.8.1 to read as follows: 4.8.1. It shall be unlawful for any person to smoke, light or carry a lighted cigar, cigarette, pipe, match or use any spark, flame, or fire producing device not specifically authorized by the appropriate district or area fire chief or inspector in any of the following areas: 1) In the board of county commissions chambers, and in all other public meeting rooms in the county courthouse complex, and administrative buildings, when a public meeting is in progress. 2) In any public theater, church, tent, motion picture house or other auditorium used for such shows or performance when the public gathers. 3) In any mercantile store which voluntarily elects, by and through the actions of its management, to be included within this section. This prohibition shall not apply to restrooms, restaurants, coffee shops, soda fountain counters, executive offices or beauty parlors in such mercantile stores. (B) CHAPTER 9: BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT (1) SECTION 9.6 FIRE DETECTION, COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS ALARM, AND (I) GENERAL i) Add Subsection 9.6.1.10 to read as follows; 9.6.1.10 The authority having jurisdiction may approve and shall have the authority to require listed manual fire alarm box covers or listed double action pull stations to be installed where manual fire alarm systems are susceptible to malicious false alarms. 17 (II) OCCUPANT NOTIFICATION ii) Amend subsection 9-6.3.8 to read as follows; 9-6.3.8 Audible alarm notification appliances shall be of such character and so distributed as to be effectively heard above the average ambient sound level occurring under normal conditions of occupancy. Residential occupancies: Audible alarm indicating devices shall be clearly audible in all bedrooms over background noise levels with all intervening doors closed. The audible alarm indicating device sounding shall be measure a minimum of 70 decibels at the pillow height in all bedrooms. (2) SECTION 9.7 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS AND OTHER EXTINGUISHING EQLrIPMENT SECTION 9.7.4 MANUAL EXTINGUISHING EQUIPMENT i) Amend 9.7.4.1 to read as follows: 9.7.4.1 Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in all commercial and multi-family occupancy classifications in accordance with NFPA 10, The Standard for the Installation of Portable Fire Extinguishers. Sec. 58-29. Reserved. SECTION TWO: Repeal of certain no longer effective ordinances. The following Collier County ordinances, having been preempted by operation of state law, are hereby repealed and are no longer of any force or effect: Ordinance #'s 76-7, 92-72, 98-74, 99-29, and 99-47. SECTION THREE: Inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances: The provisions of this Ordinance are intended to become and to be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re-lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION FOUR: Conflict and severance. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive provisions are intended to apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion is deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding will not affect the validity of the remaining portion. 18 SECTION FIVE: Effective date. This Ordinance becomes effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ,2002 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Deputy Clerk Approved as to form l~fipdc~i~'e~''~ Assistant County Attorney and legal BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLI~ER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JA1VIES N. COLETTA, Chairman Carleen A. Edwards To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com Fire Prevention Code 9/20/02 Attached please find advertising for Fri. 9/27/02. Thank you and have a Good Weekend. Fire Prevention and Fire Prevention Code. doc Code. doc Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Friday, September 20, 2002 3:01 PM Carleen A. Edwards Delivered: Fire Prevention Code 8C Fim Prevention C~e <<Fire Prevention Code>> Your message To: legals@naplesnews.com Subject: Fire Prevention Code Sent: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:03:25 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): legals on Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:01:19 -0400 NapLes Daily News NapLes, FL 34102 Affidavit of PubLication NapLes Daily News ........... ~:_;_: ........ :_ . BOARD OF COUNTY CONflISSIONERS CHER! LEFARA PO BOX ~13016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 0100042 58526223 NOTICE OF INTENT TO State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News, · daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, FLorida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida, for a period of I year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pubLiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 09/27 AD SPACE: 140.000 INCH FILED ON: 09/27/02 .... ....................................... Sworn to and Subscribed{ ~re le~h_i e~f'h day of~ '~----' 20-~ c~ Personally known by me I~-~. L.~ /)~C~U NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given rnof on TUESDiDAY CountY Commissioners WIH ~sld~r ~ enact. nance. The meetfno will commence ~e~0 Ordinance Is as Iottows: PREVENTI PROTECTION CODE BY AMENDING THE[ CODE OF LAWS AND J ORDINANCES OFI COLLIER COUNTY,/ FLORIDA, AMENDING[ CHAPTER 58, FIRE[ PREVENTION AND1 PROTECTION, ARTI- CLE II, F~E SAFETY STANDARDS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, BY RE- ~[A~"1N G SECTION 5~-26, PERTAINING TO ADOPTED STAN- DARDS AND CODES OF THE NATIONAL FIRE CODES PUB- LiSHED BY THE NA- TIONAL FIRE PRO- TECTION ASSOOATION (NFPA); REPLACING SECTION 58-27, PERTAINING TO AMENDMENTS TO ADOPTED FIRE CODES, SPECIFICAL- LY NFPA 1, ~)02 EDI- TION; REPLACING TAiNING TO AMEND- MENTS TO THE ADOPTED LIFE SAFE- TY CODE, SPEClFI- EDITION; RESE. RrvIN~ SECTION ~-29: RE- PEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES:- PRO- VIOtNG FOR q'HE IN- CLUSION IN THEI beNh~TE: ~1, persons Itemtobe~ ln- dlvlducd ~k~ ers will be limited ~ $ minut~ on ~,an ~nlz~ ree(~qtted ~ the Ch~.lr- m~y be allotted 10 mln- u~eto sl~ak oran iten~ rsons wishing' TO genda pock e,~, mu~ submlf ~]ld o minimum of 3 w~eks publlc .l:~,mrmo,, m., Qp¥ ~ ~0 be COA~ld~r~d by ~e Boord ~]11 b~ sub- public h~rlne. All .m~.. ri. before the Boardrd will be- the recor~ ~ne BoeY~ will need o re-I tcord of ~he progeedlnos/ Ipertelnlng thsrefo~ an.d[ ltterefore,/.mew need 7o/ lensure ~ o venxmm[ 8C ORDINANCE NO. 2002- AN ORDINANCE READOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION CODE BY AMENDING THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 58, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION, ARTICLE II, FIRE SAFETY STANDARDS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, BY REPLACING SECTION 58-26, PERTAINING TO ADOPTED STANDARDS AND CODES OF THE NATIONAL FIRE CODES PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA); REPLACING SECTION 58-27, PERTAINING TO AMENDMENTS TO ADOPTED FIRE CODES, SPECIFICALLY NFPA 1, 2002 EDITION; REPLACING SECTION 58-28, PERTAINING TO AMENDMENTS TO THE ADOPTED LIFE SAFETY CODE, SPECIFICALLY NFPA 101, 2002 EDITION; RESERVING SECTION 58-29; REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR THE INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (Board) has fire safety responsibilities for Collier County; and WHEREAS, Section 633.025, Florida Statutes, subsection (1) establishes the Florida Fire Prevention Code and the Life Safety Code as the state minimum code; and WHEREAS, Section 633.025, Florida Statutes, subsection (4) enables a county with fire safety responsibilities to adopt more stringent fire safety standards or alternative requirements where, as here, a determination has been made that there is a need to strengthen the requirements of the minimum fire safety code adopted and enforced by Collier County; and WHEREAS, the Board hereby determines upon its review of local conditions - which review demonstrates that local conditions justify more stringent requirements than those specified in the minimum fire and life safety code for the protection of life and property or justify requirements that meet special situations arising from historic, geographic, or unusual conditions - that local amendments to the statewide minimum code are needed and will serve a public purpose; and WHEREAS, by operation of certain statutory provisions the previously existing local amendments to then existing fire and life safety code provisions then in effect have been replaced by the statewide minimum code making appropriate the repeal of no longer effective local ordinances comprising Article II of Chapter 58 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 633.025, subsection (4)(a) a properly advertised public hearing was held and all interested persons were afforded the opportunity to provide any comments; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to update the Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Code to reflect the foregoing matters; and WHEREAS, the amendments to the statewide minimum code set forth below are essential to maintain an established and effective level of fire prevention and protection. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The text of the following sections of Chapter 58 of Article II, of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, are replaced with the text which follows: Sec. 58-26. Collier County Fire Protection and Prevention Code Adopted. The standards and Code sections of the "National Fire Codes", as published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), as adopted by the rules of the Division of the State Fire Marshal section 4A-3.012, 4A-60.005 or referenced by the 2000 edition of NFPA 1 or NFPA 101 and those listed below by standard number and edition and as amended herein, are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of the "Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Code," intended to protect the health, safety, common interest, and convenience of the citizens, visitors, and residents of Collier County, Florida. NFPA Code Standard Edition 18 1995 42 1997 50A 1999 70E 2000 79 1997 97 2000 170 1999 412 1998 423 1999 513 1998 560 1995 600 200O 601 2000 801 1998 901 2001 1961 1997 1964 1998 Description Wetting Agents Storage of Pyroxylin Plastic Gaseous Hydrogen Systems Electrical Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces Electrical Standard for Industrial Machinery Glossary of Terms Relating to Chimneys and Vents Fire Safety Symbols Evaluating Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Foam Equip. Const. and Protection of Aircraft Engine Test Facilities Motor Freight Terminals Storage, Handling and Use of Ethylene Oxide Industrial Fire Brigades Security Service in Fire Loss Prevention Facilities Handling Radioactive Materials Standard Classifications for Incident Reporting Fire Hose Spray Nozzles Sec. 58-27. Amendments to Fire Codes. The "National Fire Codes, NFPA 1, Fire Prevention Code, 2000 Edition," is hereby amended by local amendment as follows: (A) CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT (1) BOARD OF APPEALS Strike all existing text and amend 1-8 to read as follows: 1-8 BOARD OF APPEALS Will operate and be comprised as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code, Division 5.4, except that the Collier County Fire Marshal's Association may recommend those two members one of whom would be an architect or engineer and one whom must be a fire protection specialist for consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. (2) NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS, PENALTIES i) Amend 1-19.3 to read as follows; 1-19-3 Any person who fails to comply with the provisions of this code or who fails to carry out an order made pursuant of this code or violates any condition attached to a permit, approval, or certificate shall be subject to the penalties established by this jurisdiction. Nothing herein contained is intended to prevent the Independent Fire Districts of Collier County from taking such other lawful action in any court of competent jurisdiction as the District deems necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. Such other lawful action shall include, but shall not be limited to, any equitable action for injunctive relief or action at law for damages. The Independent Fire Districts of Collier County shall have the power to enforce the provisions of this Code and ordinances by means of the Collier County Code Enforcement Boards. (B) CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT (1) APPLICATION i) Amend subsection 1-5.2 to read as follows: 1-5.2 Details regarding processes, methods, specifications, equipment testing and maintenance, design standards, performance, installation, or other pertinent criteria contained in those standards and codes listed in Chapter 32 of this Code and those adopted pursuant to the Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Code Section 58-26 shall be considered a part of this code. ii) Amend Subsection 1-5.5 to read as follows: 1-5.5 Buildings in existence or permitted for construction prior to the adoption of this Code shall comply with the provisions stated herein or referenced for existing buildings Existing buildings or installations that do not comply with the provisions of the publications referenced in 1-5.2 shall be permitted to be continued in use, unless the authority having jurisdiction determines that the lack of conformity with these standards presents an imminent danger. Exception: A limited but reasonable time shall be allowed for compliance with any part of this Code for existing buildings, commensurate with the magnitude of expenditure, disruption of services, and degree of hazard. Occupied existing buildings shall comply with 1-9.2. (2) OCCUPANCY i) Amend Subsection 1-9.1 to read as follows: 1-9.1 No new construction or existing building shall be occupied in whole or in part in violation of the provisions of this Code or other applicable Collier County laws and ordinances. All tenants and occupants shall obtain a "Notice of Fire Compliance" certificate from the appropriate fire district prior to the occupancy and .use of a new or existing building as evidence of compliance with the Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Code. Such original certificate shall be displayed in a prominent location within the structure, building, or portion thereof. Exception: Occupants of one and two family dwellings and residential tenants in multi-family buildings are exempt from the requirement of obtaining a "Notice of Fire Compliance". (3) PERMITS AND APPROVALS i) Amend Subsection 1-16.16(3) to read as follows: Bonfires and Outdoor Rubbish Fires. Kindling or maintaining any open fire or a fire in any public street, alley, road, or other public or private ground. Instructions and stipulations of permit shall be adhered to. Cooking fires and small recreational fires not intended for vegetation or rubbish disposal, when conducted safely and on the property of the subject are exempt and do not require a permit. ii) Not withstanding the above provisions, for 30 days commencing with the declaration of a state of emergency by the Governor of the State of Florida, because of extended drought and the resulting potential for wildfires, which includes all or parts of Collier County, there shall become effective a prohibition against kindling, creating or maintaining any campfire, bonfire, open or barrel burning of trash, discarding of lighted smoking materials outdoors, smoking in county parks, and the sale or use of fireworks. The use of open barbecues or barbecue pits utilizing charcoal or wood shall be prohibited within 600 yards of any forest, grassland, woods, wild lands or marsh area within Collier County. The prohibitions expressly provided herein may be extended by resolution duly adopted by the board. (4) PLANS REVIEW i) Amend Subsection 18.2 to read as follows: 1-18.2 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that: (1) The construction documents include all of the fire protection requirements (2) The shop drawings are correct and in compliance with the applicable codes and standards (3) All plans for proposed new structures and square footage additions to existing structures include 8 and ½ x 11 page or pages entitled "Fire Protection Plan" that depict the following: (a) Completed form titled "Collier County Fire Districts Pre-Incident Planning Data". Form must be completely filled out, indicating N/A where not applicable. (b) Use of Uniform Drawing Symbols and Legend as published in NFPA 170, Standard for Fire Safety Symbols (particularly chapters 5 & 6) 1999 Edition: Copyright National Fire Protection Association. (c) North arrow. (d) Overall building dimensions. (e) To scale site plan showing the entire property boundaries, entire structural footprint, all building entrance openings, exit stairs, pavement areas and fire lanes, fire hydrants, adjacent roadways with names, and distances to all fire hydrants within 1000 f~ (304.8m) measured along the centerline of the street, driveway or fire lane. (f) Florida Building Code Construction Type. (g) Number of stories of structure and total square footage under roof per story. (h) A wall detail/section from foundation through the roof illustrating the predominant or typical floor(s), wall(s) and roof materials. Such detail/section shall be keyed with a call mark on the structural footprint required (a) above. (i) Needed fire flow as required by section 7-5.1.1. (j) Fire district water supply flow test(s) as required by section 7- 5.1.5. (k) Main utility (electric, gas, water, etc.) shutoff locations. (1) Hazardous and/or combustible materials locations and estimated quantities. (re)Locations of features of fire protection systems (fire department connections, fire sprinkler shut-off, fire alarm panels, standpipes etc.) Exception 1: Group R-3. One and Two-family Residences. Exception 2: Ancillary structures like guardhouses, restrooms etc. Not exceeding 1000 square feet in area. Exception 3: Square footage additions that do not exceed 1000 square feet. (5) COST OF PERMIT (i) Add Section 1-21 to read as follows: 1-21 COST OF PERMIT Refer to Collier County Resolution No. 01-313, (establishing fees), Exhibit B (C) CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS (1) DEFINITIONS (i) Add the following definitions to read as follows: 2-1.166 Fire Marshal - The Fire Chief or his/her designee within each independent fire district or the Collier County manager or his/her designee within any dependant fire district within Collier County. 2-1.167 Fire Official- The individual appointed by the FIRE DISTRICTS and employed by the Administrative District who is responsible for the fire plan review office. 2-1.168 Owner- Any person or entity having a legal or equitable interest in the property. 2-1.169 Interlocal agreement- An agreement entered into between the board of County Commissioners and any Independent Fire District(s). 2-1.170 Manual Wet Standpipe- Refer to NFPA 14:3-2.5 2-1.171 Residential Occupancy (Group R) - Refer to the Florida Building Code, 2000 Edition for the definition and sub-classification, or its successor. (ii) Amend 2-1.67 to read as follows; 2-1.67 Fire lane means any driveway, road, or unobstructed area, which may be used by the fire department for the movement of fire vehicles or firefighting operations. (D) CHAPTER 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS (1) OPEN OUTDOOR FIRES, INCINERATORS, OUTDOOR FIREPLACES. i) Amend Subsection 3-4.1 to read as follows: 3-4.1 Permits. Permits are required and shall comply with Section 1-16. Exception; Cooking fires and small recreational fires not intended for vegetation or rubbish disposal when conducted safely and on the property of the subject. Notwithstanding the above provisions, for 30 days commencing with the declaration of a state of emergency by the Governor of the State of Florida, because of extended drought and the resulting potential for wildfires, which includes all or parts of Collier County, there shall become effective a prohibition against kindling, creating or maintaining any campfire, bonfire, open or barrel burning of trash, discarding of lighted smoking materials outdoors, smoking in county parks, and the sale or use of fireworks. The use of open barbecues or barbecue pits utilizing charcoal or wood shall be prohibited within 600 yards of any forest, grassland, woods, wiM lands or marsh area within Collier County. The prohibitions expressly provided herein may be extended by resolution duly adopted by the board ii) Amend Subsection 3-4.7 to read as follows: 3-4.7 No charcoal burners shall be kindled or maintained on balconies or within 10 feet of any structure. Exception: Single-family dwellings. iii) 3-4.8 No gas-fired cooking grill shall be kindled or maintained on balconies or within 10 feet of any structure. LP gas cylinders in excess of 21/2 lbs, water weight shall not be stored within 10 f~ of a residential building. Exception: Single-family dwellings. (2) FIRE LANES i) Amend Subsection 3-5.2 to read as follows; 3-5.2 All buildings that a fire department may be called to protect that are not readily accessible to an adjacent local street shall be provided with a suitable fire lane or parallel access drive unless the analysis of the fire official indicates the fire access is unnecessary. Such fire access is necessary for all buildings three (3) or more stories in height which are not adjacent to a local street. (a) Parking spaces adjacent to structures that, in the opinion of the fire official, may hinder or delay firefighting forces in the performance of their duties are prohibited. Limited designated parking spaces may be approved by the fire official when alternative arrangements are made prior to construction, which must include automatic fire suppression systems. (b) The fire official may require additional fire lanes around commercial buildings when his or her analysis indicates additional access to the building is needed. (c) No new wet or dry retention or detention areas shall be located directly adjacent to any structure unless prior approval is received from the fire official. ii) Add subsection 3-5.2.1 to read as follows; 3-5.2.1 Fire lanes shall be not less than 20 fi (6m) of unobstructed width, able to with stand live loads of fire apparatus, and have a minimum of 14 t~ vertical clearance. Turning radii for fire lanes not exceeding a 90 degree turn where serving buildings shall be 25 fi inside and 49 fi outside and turning radii for fire lanes serving parking lots only shall be 25 fi inside and 45 fi outside. Where tums exceed 90 degrees the standards for turnarounds shall apply. An approved mm around for fire apparatus shall be provided where an access road is a dead end and in excess of 150 fi (46m) in length. The turnaround shall have a minimum centerline radius of 40 feet (12.7m). The grade surface and location of the fire lane shall be approved by the authority having jurisdiction. At least one elevation of each building shall be accessible to the fire department. Required fire lanes shall be provided with the inner edge of the roadway no closer than 10 feet and no farther than 30 feet from the building. Such lanes shall have a surface designed to accommodate fire apparatus with a minimum weight of 32 tons. Exception No. 1: Adequacy of emergency vehicle access shall be determined by the authority having jurisdiction. Exception No. 2: T or Y turnaround arrangements shall be permitted. 8 Exception No. 3: - When acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction, turnaround arrangements other than a cul-de-sac shall be permitted to be used. iii) Add Subsection 3-5.5.1 to read as follows: 3-5.5.1 EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS 3-5.5.1 This section is intended to apply to all gate installations EXCEPT those serving individual single-family residences. iv) Add Subsection 3-5.5.1.1 to read as follows: 3-5.5.1.1 All electronic access control gate to structures and properties that may require emergency services that restrict the free ingress and egress of emergency vehicles and are not constantly attended 24 hours per day shall be provided with an electronic transmitter/receiver system capable of being programmed with a unique activation code and frequency approved by the authority having jurisdiction. Such code or frequency shall not be used by or provided to other gate users. Existing installations shall comply within 180 days subsequent to the notification date by the authority having jurisdiction. v) Add Subsection 3-5.5.2.3 to read as follows; 3-5.5.2.3 All electronic access control gates under section 3-5.5.1.1 shall be compatible with the uniform county -wide transmitters. Said transmitters are carried only within emergency services vehicles. vi) Add Subsection 3-5.5.2.4 to read as follows; 3-5.5.2.4 All electronic access control gates shall have a battery backup with a fail safe override. Exception No. 1 - Any other override system acceptable to the Authority having jurisdiction. Exception No. 2 - Gates serving individual single-family residences. vii) Add Subsection 3-5.5.2.5 to read as follows; 3-5.5.2.5 All non-electronic access control gates to structures and properties that may require emergency services that restrict the free ingress and egress of emergency vehicles and are not constantly attended 24 hours a day shall be provided with a key box per section 3-6. Exception No. 1 - Gates serving individual single-family residences. viii) Add Subsection 3-5.5.2.6 to read as follows; 3-5.5.2.6 All electronic gates are required to receive a building permit with fire review prior to installation. ix) Amend Subsection 3-5.6.2. lto read as follows; 3-5.6.2.1 Hydrants. Clearance of 3 feet to the rear and sides of fire hydrants and clear to the street. No new wet or dry retention or detention areas shall be located between the fire hydrant and the fire access area unless prior approval is received from the fire official. x) Amend Subsection 3-5.6.2.2 to read as follows; 3-5.6.2.2 Fire Protection Appliances. Clearance of 3 feet to sides and clear to the street. No new wet or dry retention or detention areas shall be located between the fire appliance and the fire access area unless prior approval is received from the fire official. (3) PUBLIC ASSEMBLAGES AND EVENTS i) Add section 3-10.7 to rear as follows; 3-10.7 Public Assemblages and Events ii) Add subsection 3-10.7.1 to read as follows; Where the authority having jurisdiction determines that the gathering of persons in a structure or outside of a structure or the nature of the performance, exhibition, display, contest, or activity presents or is predicted to present unusual and significant impact on public safety, including access to buildings, structures, fire hydrants, fire lanes, and the like, or other provisions of public safety services, including fire protection and emergency medical services, the authority having jurisdiction shall have the authority to order the development of or prescribe a plan for the provision of safety services which provides a reasonable degree of safety for the attendees, participants and other affected members of the public. iii) Add Subsection 3-10.7.2 to read as follows; 10 3-10.7.2 iv) 3-10.7.3 The plan shall address such items as emergency vehicle ingress and egress, fire protection, emergency medical services, fire and safety inspections, public assembly areas and the directing of attendees and vehicles, vendor and food concession distribution, and the need for the presence of law enforcement, fire, and medical services personnel at the event. Said plan shall be submitted to the authority having jurisdiction a minimum of two weeks prior to the starting date of the event. Add Subsection 3-10.7.3 to read as follows; The authority having jurisdiction is hereby authorized to assess and collect reasonable compensation for services rendered to public assemblages and events covered by the provisions of section 3-10.7, as it may deem necessary in accordance with the applicable service resolution of the governing body. (4) CLOTHES DRYER VENTING i) Add section 3-11 to read as follows; Venting of clothes dryers, whether electric or gas fired shall be on the floor of origin or into an approved shaft. Exception 1: Group R-3, Detached one and two-family residences. Exception 2: Other arrangements as may be approved by the authority having jurisdiction. (E) CHAPTER 7 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS i) Amend Subsection 7-2.2.2 to read as follows; Exception 1: Buildings classified as R-2, four stories in height are required to have manual wet standpipes in accordance with NFPA 14. ii) Add Subsection 7-2.2.2.1 to read as follows 7-2.2.2.1 Any building five stories or more in height and not otherwise classified as a high rise building as defined by the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition, shall have an automatic wet standpipe system in accordance with NFPA 14 capable of supplying the required gallons per minute with a residual pressure of 65 psi at the uppermost hose connection. iii) Add Subsection 7-2.2.2.2 to read as follows; 7-2.2.2.2 Any high-rise building as defined by the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition shall have an automatic wet standpipe system in 11 accordance with NFPA 14 capable of supplying the required gallons per minute with a residual pressure of 100 psi at the uppermost hose connection. iv) Add Subsection 7-2.2.2.3 to read as follows; 7-2.2.2.3 Fire department valves on standpipe systems shall not be pressure-reducing valves. Pressure restricting devices shall be installed on any valve with pressure in excess of 175 psi. Pressure restricting devices shall be so as to be readily removable, leaving hose threads acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction. v) Add Subsection 7-2.2.2.4 to read as follows; 7-2.2.2.4 All fire department connections, other than those serving a high rise building, shall be located within 50 t~ (15.25m) of a fire hydrant and within 50 f't (15.25m) of a fire department vehicle access road. Exception 1: Fire department connections supplying fire sprinkler systems in accordance with NFPA 13R that are not a part of a standpipe system. Exception 2: Actual locations of fire department connections shall be as approved by the authority having jurisdiction. vi) Add Subsection 7-2.2.2.5 to read as follows; 7-2.2.2.5 New high-rise buildings shall be equipped with two fire department connections. One connection shall be located at the building and one shall be located within 15 f~ (4.6m) of a fire hydrant. Either fire department connection shall be capable of operating independently of the other. The second fire department connection required at the building shall not be required to be located within 50 f~ (15.25m) of a fire hydrant. vii) Add subsection 7-3.1.1. to read as follows: 7-3.1.1. Automatic sprinklers shall be installed and maintained in full operating condition, as specified for the occupancy involved in the codes or standards listed in Chapter 32. Installations shall be in accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems; NFPA 13R, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Residential Occupancies up to and Including Four Stories in Height; or NFPA 13D, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One and Two Family Dwellings and Manufactured Homes, as appropriate. 12 viii) ix) 7-3.2.2.1 All fire sprinkler systems shall be designed with hydraulic calculation method. System design will be based on a current flow test. For flow tests with a static pressure of 55 PSI or more the test will be extrapolated to seasonal static of 50 PSI. The formula is as follows: X Factor = Seasonal Static / Measured Static Design Res. Pres. = (Residual Pres) x (X Factor) Design Pitot PSI = (Pitot Press) x (Xfactor) For flow tests with a static of less than 50 PSI the un-extrapolated flow test shall be used. However in this case a minimum safety factor of 5 psi above the demand point of the system shall be used. Fire flow data shall be attached to the hydraulic calculations as per section 7-5.1.1. Add to Section 7-3.2.2 to read as follows: Automatic fire extinguishing systems shall be provided, in accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, when required by this Code, or referenced codes and standards listed in Chapter 32; and in all new residential occupancies containing more than four (4) living units; and when otherwise required by Collier County. Exception No. 1: Residential occupancies up to four (4) stories in height may be protected in accordance with NFPA 13R, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Residential Occupancies up to and Including Four Stories in Height, where not otherwise required to be protected by sprinklers pursuant to the Building Code or other applicable standards. Add subsection 7-3.2.2.1, to read as follows; All Automatic fire extinguishing systems, installed voluntarily, arbitrarily or otherwise, shall provide an adequate means (stub-out) for future fire sprinkler protection on lanais, balconies and canopies in residential occupancies. x) Amend subsection 7-3.4.2 to eliminate (2),(3) and (4). And add two exceptions to the existing exception as follows: Exception No 2: 13D systems in one and two family dwellings. Exception No 3: Sprinkler piping serving not more than six sprinklers connected directly to a domestic 13 water supply system. However the control valve shall be locked in the open position. xi) Add Subsection 7-5.1.1 to read as follows; 7-5.1.1 The following are fire flow requirements for new construction, changes in occupancy or use to a more hazardous classification (according to National Fire Protection Association 101, 2000 edition) or any physical enlargement of existing buildings. All one and two family dwellings are exempt form these requirements except new subdivisions as provided for in (1) a below: New exclusive one and two family subdivisions: Building Square Footage Min. Fire Flow (GPm) Less than or equal to 5000 500 Greater than 5000 750 Subdivisions not capable of delivering the required fire flow shall provide automatic sprinkler systems in accordance with NFPA 13, 13R or 13D, 1999 editions as applicable. All other buildings shall calculate required fire flows in accordance with the following formula shown in subsection (3) below. This formula establishes a base flow from which the degree of hazard, credit for fire sprinkler protection and separation distance will result in a final needed fire flow. National Fire Protection Association 13, 1999 edition shall be used for the purpose of determining hazard classification. NFPA classification Light Ordinary I & II Extra Formula application Light Ordinary High Fire flow based on the formula NFF= [(18) x COEFFICIENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE) x { SQUARE ROOT (BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE)) x HAZARD FACTOR x EXPOSURE FACTOR x FIRE SPRINKLER FACTOR Coefficients based on construction type. 1.5 = Wood (Type VI) 1.0 = Ordinary (Type V) 0.8 = Noncombustible (Type III & IV) 0.6 = * Fire resistive (Type I & II) Coefficient based on hazard. 0.75 = Light hazard 1.0 = Ordinary hazard 1.25 = High hazard 14 Coefficient based on exposure distance in feet. 0-10 = 1.25 11-30 = 1.2 31-60 = 1.15 61-100 = 1.1 101-150 = 1.05 >150 = 1 Coefficient based on fire sprinklers. 0.5 = Fully fire sprinklered 1 = Not fully fire sprinklered *Fire resistive construction need only be calculated on the three (3) largest successive floors of highest hazard classification. A four-hour "fire wall" may be used to reduce total square footage of a building for the purposes of fire flow requirements, providing the wall intersects each successive floor of the building and complies with NFPA 221. The minimum required fire flow for commercial and multi-family occupancies shall be 750 GPM. Owners and developers shall make provisions to install water lines and fire hydrants to meet spacing and fire flow requirements. Where fire mains exist but do not meet the fire flow requirements, alternative arrangements may be made, prior to construction, with the authority having jurisdiction. Due to the concern for public safety, failure to meet the fire flow requirements or come to alternative agreement shall be grounds for refusal for the county to issue building permits. xii) Add Subsection 7-5.1.2 to read as follows; 7-5.1.2 Where buildings are constructed, with the furthest point of the structure being one hundred fifty (150) feet or more from a public street, requires private mains and fire hydrants which shall meet the required fire flow with spacing to be determined by the fire official, not to exceed three hundred (300) foot maximum distance between hydrants. Hydrant spacing and required fire flow may be altered by the fire official if, by prior arrangement with the fire official, automatic fire suppression systems are installed in all buildings on the premises. xiii) Add subsection 7-5.1.3 to read as follows: 7-5.1.3 Maximum distance between fire hydrants shall be five hundred (500) feet in exclusive one and two family areas with buildings not exceeding 5000 sq fi, and three hundred (300) feet in all other areas. xiv) add subsection 7-5.1.4 to read as follows: 7-5.1.4 Where buildings are proposed in an area not meeting the hydrant spacing requirements, the owner or 15 developer shall provide the number of hydrants prescribed by the fire official, under the terms of this section. xv) Add subsection 7-5.1.5 to read as follows: 7-5.1.5 Prior to development of new structures or fire protection systems, a fire flow test in accordance with NFPA 291 shall be preformed by the fire district having jurisdiction. Such tests shall be completed no longer than six months prior to the submittal for permit. Calculations of the available fire flow at a minimum of 20 psi residual shall be provided on the fire protection plan required by section 1-18.2 or with the hydraulic calculation package submitted for fire protection system permits. Fire flow test reports shall be submitted on the official letterhead of the fire district having jurisdiction. xvi) Add subsection 7-5.1.6 to read as follows: 7-5.1.6 Fire hydrants shall be provided for structures in accordance with NFPA 24 and shall be distributed so that the Needed Fire Flow determined by the fire official may be delivered. Hydrant locations and distances to proposed structures shall be indicated on the Fire Protection Plan required in section 1-18.2 xvii) Add subsection 7-5.1.7 to read as follows: 7-5.1.7 Proposed single structure site developments within 1000 f~ (304.8m) of existing water mains shall extend such mains so that the main sizes and hydrant locations comply with the provisions of this code. Measurement of the distance shall be along existing or proposed roads, street, driveways or fire lanes as applicable. Where no piped water supply exists within 1000 Pt (304.8m) distance criteria, the requirements of NFPA 1142, Standard on Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting 1999 edition, shall apply. Proposed multi-structure site developments shall provide permanent fire protection water supply from a public or private utility system or construct a private engineered water system acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction and capable of delivering the required Needed Fire Flow specified in subsection7- 5.1.1 xviii) Add subsection 7-7.1.4 to read as follows: 7-7.1.4 All fire sprinkler systems shall be monitored by a UL listed Remote or Central station monitoring agency. Exception No 1: One and two family dwellings xix) Add subsection 7-7.1.5 to read as follows: 7-7-1.5 All fire sprinkler systems shall activate one or more monitored audio/visual device located on the exterior of the building. The number and location of the device(s) shall be approved by the authority having jurisdiction. 16 Exception: Single family dwellings (F) CHAPTER 13: COMMERCIAL COOKING EQUIPMENT (1) 13-2 PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS i) Amend subsection 13-2.3 to eliminate the exception. Sec. 58-28. Amendments to the Life Safety Code. NFPA 101 Code for Safety to Life from Fire in Buildings and Structures, 2000 Edition, is amended as follows: (A) CHAPTER 4: GENERAL i) Add new subsection 4.8, "Use of Fire and Spark Producing Devices in Public Places" to read as follows: 4.8 Use of Fire and Spark Producing Devices in Public Places. ii) Add new subsection 4.8.1 to read as follows: 4.8.1. It shall be unlawful for any person to smoke, light or carry a lighted cigar, cigarette, pipe, match or use any spark, flame, or fire producing device not specifically authorized by the appropriate district or area fire chief or inspector in any of the following areas: 1) In the board of county commissions chambers, and in all other public meeting rooms in the county courthouse complex, and administrative buildings, when a public meeting is in progress. 2) In any public theater, church, tent, motion picture house or other auditorium used for such shows or performance when the public gathers. 3) In any mercantile store which voluntarily elects, by and through the actions of its management, to be included within this section. This prohibition shall not apply to restrooms, restaurants, coffee shops, soda fountain counters, executive offices or beauty parlors in such mercantile stores. (El) CHAPTER 9: BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT (1) SECTION 9.6 FIRE DETECTION, ALARM, COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (I) GENERAL i) Add Subsection 9.6.1.10 to read as follows; 9.6.1.10 The authority having jurisdiction may approve and shall have the authority to require listed manual fire alarm box covers or listed double action pull stations to be installed where manual fire alarm systems are susceptible to malicious false alarms. 17 (II) OCCUPANT NOTIFICATION ii) Amend subsection 9-6.3.8 to read as follows; 9-6.3.8 Audible alarm notification appliances shall be of such character and so distributed as to be effectively heard above the average ambient sound level occurring under normal conditions of occupancy. Residential occupancies: Audible alarm indicating devices shall be clearly audible in all bedrooms over background noise levels with all intervening doors closed. The audible alarm indicating device sounding shall be measure a minimum of 70 decibels at the pillow height in all bedrooms. (2) SECTION 9.7 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS AND OTHER EXTINGUISHING EQUIPMENT SECTION 9.7.4 MANUAL EXTINGUISHING EQUIPMENT i) Amend 9.7.4.1 to read as follows: 9.7.4.1 Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in all commercial and multi-family occupancy classifications in accordance with NFPA 10, The Standard for the Installation of Portable Fire Extinguishers. Sec. 58-29. Reserved. SECTION TWO: Repeal of certain no longer effective ordinances. The following Collier County ordinances, having been preempted by operation of state law, are hereby repealed and are no longer of any force or effect: Ordinance #'s 76-7, 92-72, 98-74, 99-29, and 99-47. SECTION THREE: Inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances: The provisions of this Ordinance are intended to become and to be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re-lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION FOUR: Conflict and severance. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive provisions are intended to apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion is deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding will not affect the validity of the remaining portion. 18 SECTION FIVE: Effective date. This Ordinance becomes effective upon filing with the Department of State. pASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of ~ ,,:/C'Co[l:i~r'C,o!~nty, Florida, this day of ,2002 "'.ATTF. g~: }~) . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS o~~--~, ~oc~, cl~r~ co~ co~y2.o~.z~X.~ BY: Deputy Clerl( Attest as to Approved as to form~t~n]tUre~a~15'--- ---- Assistant County Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoin9 is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2002-49 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 8th day of October, 2002, durin9 Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 9th day of October, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts a.na C'terk : ' Ex-officio to BQar~, o-f~. County Commissioner~ ' By: Ellie Hof fman, Deputy Clerk COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: X Normal legal Advertisement (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dept/Div: Emergency Management Person: Kenneth F Pineau Date: 8/20/02 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): Petitioner: (Name & Address): Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) }tearing betbre X BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appearing 10 days before hearin~ Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): X Naples Daily News [] Other [] Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 38, CIVIL EMERGENCIES, ARTICLE Ill, DECLARATION OF STATE OF EMERGENCY, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES, ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 84-37, AS AMENDED, AM ENDING SECTIONS 38.58 AND 38.59 ADDING TO SUCCESSION OF AUTHORITY TO 1NCLUDE ALL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AND THE DEPUTY COUNTY MANAGER; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? X Yes [] No . Revie .'ed by:~ ., / Division Head Date If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 001-144110-649100 List Attachments: Ordinance DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS Ao For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same. is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to Clerk's Office [] Requesting Division [-]Original B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. Date Received: ~ Date of Public hearing: ate Advertised: ORDINANCE NO. 2002 - j 811 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 38, CIVIL EMERGENCIES, AR'FICI.E III, DECLARATION OF STATE OF EMERGENCY, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE ()F I.AWS sND ORDINANCES. ALSO KNOWN ,kS ORDINANCE NO. 84-37. ~ya~l'~,T'? C'DI, NTY MANkGER; PROVIDING FOR iNC!.a~SII)N ;?~ ~q)DE OV I.AgVS ~ND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR ~NF1A{T kND SEVERABII.AT¥: ~Ni) PRO~IDIN('; FOR xN ~, ~tt:Rlz.k,~, i.'k)rida Statutes. Chaptcr ..5_ provides li0r emergency m;magcmcnt ibr Florida and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes, Chapter 252 has been amended from time to time and Collier County desires to i~ave its existing Emergency Management Ordinance conform to the Florida statutory provisions; and WHEREAS, there is a need to clarify certain provisions of the existing Collier County Emergency Management Ordinance in order to better define the extent of the County's emergency management powers; and WHEREAS, certain issues pertaining to rendering outside aid and liability for the use of private property are being provided for herein; and WHEREAS, the intent of the following amendments is to ensure that Collier County is properly prepared in the event of a hurricane or other natural or manmade disaster; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that Collier County Ordinance 84-37, as amended, is further amended as follows: SECTION ONE: Article III. Declaration of State of Emergency, Sections 38-56, through 38-70 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida are amended as follows: Section 38-56. Intent. It is the intent of the county to designate a county official to declare a local state of emergency and to authorize certain actions relating thereto when a quorum of the board of county commissioners is unable to meet. For the purpose of this article, "emergency" is defined as provided in F.S. ch. 252, as follows: any occurrence, or threat thereof, whether accidental, natural or caused by man, in war or in peace, which results or may result in substantial injury or harm to the population or substantial damage to or loss of property. Words underlined added; Words are ........... ~h are deleted. i 8D (Ord. No. 84-37, § 1) Section 38.57. Definitions. ~1 } 'q')isaster" means anv natural, technological, or civil emergency that causes damage of i)dcrai assist~cc, including immediate military mvolvcmcm. "Major d~saster" means a dis~ter that wilt likely exceed local capabilities and require a broad range of state and federal assistance. (c) "Minor disaster" me~s a disaster that is likely to be within the response capabilities of local government ~d to result in only a minimal need for state or federal ~sist~ce. (2) "Division" me~s the Division of Emergency M~agement ofthe D~a~ent of Co~ity Aff~rs, or the successor to ~at division. (3) "Emergency" means ~y occ~mce, or t~eat thereof, whe~er natal, technolo~cal, or m~ade, in w~ or in peace, which results or may result in subst~ti~ inj~ or h~ to the population or subst~tial d~age to or loss ofprop~y. (4) "Emergency m~agement" me~s ~e prep~ation for, ~e mitigation eL ~e re~onse to, ~d the recovery ~om emergencies ~d dis~tem Specific merg~cy m~agement responsibilities include, but ~e not limited to: (a) Reduction of ~lnerability of people ~d co--unities of this state to dmage, inju~, ~d loss of life ~d propemy resulting Rom na~ml, tec~olo~c~, or m~ade emergencies or hostile milit~ ofp~milit~ action. (b) Prep~mion for prompt md effici~t response ~d recove~ to prot~t lives ~d prope~y affected by emergencies. (c) Re~onse to emergencies using all systms, plus, ~d reso~ces necessa~ to prese~e adequately ~e heal~, safety, ~d welf~e of persons or prope~y affected by ~e emergency. (d) Recove~ ~om em~gencies by providing for ~e rapid md orderly s~ of restoration ~d rehabilitation of persons ~d prope~ affected by em~genci~. 2~ Words underlined are added; Words s~_':]: t?.ra'.:'gk are deleted. (e) Provision of an emergency management system embodying all aspects ofpre- cmergency preparedness and post-emergency response, recovery, and mitigation. \sslstancc in anticipation, reco~mition, appraisal, prevention, anti m~tigation -.::}Cl'~Zcnc7 Managclncnt l)epaNment mcatls die Coulltv ~.icpartnlcnt created tccordancc 'x~th the provisions or' Florida taw to discharge the emergency managcmcnl responsibilitics and Ihnctions of Collicr County. (6) "Manmade emergency" me~s m~ emergency caused by an action against persons or society, including, but not limited to, enemy attack, sabotage, te~orism, civil ~rest, or other action impairing the orderly administration ofgovement. (7) "Natural emergency" me~s an emergency caused by a nat~al event, including, but not limited to, a humc~e, a sto~, a flood, severe wave actio~ a drou~t, or ~ ea~qu~e. (8) The Director of the Office of Emergency M~agem~t is ~e co~ty official having the responsibility to execute the emergency m~agement pl~ in Collier CounW md shall hereinafter be refe~ed to as ~e "Director". Section 3~58. Officer designated to declare emergent. P~su~t to F.S. ch. 252, which authorizes the wMver ofproced~m ~d fo~aliti~ o~emse required of political subdivisions to t~e w~tever prudent action is necess~ to ensue ~e heal~, safety ~d welf~e of the co~ity in ~e event of a state of em~gency, when a quo~ of ~e bo~d of county co~ission is unable to meet, the chai~ of the bo~d of co~w co~issioners, or vice-chai~ in his or her absence, ~d in the absence of the chai~an md vice-chai~; ~e next County Co~issioner in order of seniority; ~d in the absence of ~y Commissioner: ~ ~e ~ounW M~ager, in the ~sence of the County M~ager; ~ ~e dzzi~cc cf the Cl~k of Coups; md in the Clerk's absence ~e Deputy Co~ty Mmag~ g ~ hereby desi~ated ~d empowered to decI~e a local state of emerg~cy whenever ~ the desi~ated person . according to the above order of preference shall dete~ine that a na~ or mmade ~s~ter h~ occ~ or that ~e occ~ence or threat o f one is i~inent ~d reqmres i~ediate ~d exp~itious action. (Ord. 84-37, ~ 2) Words underlined are added; Words s~::!: ,s..~...., ~-~h are deleted. Section 38-59. Extent of Statement of Emergency. A ~latc of emergency shall' be declared by proclamation of the chairman, or the vice chairman 2f i~_c:£ :lbsence, md in Ibc absence of tim chairman :md vice chairman: Ibc next ;'- 'k:,~ Je:;:3::~.:: ,~l' .he i)cputy County Manager. Fhc state oi'~m~rl3cnc?r shall conlinuc i~>r sc~cn ~7~ iaxs ;lltd ltlax i)C extended m seven i7) day increments until thc chaimmn, or Xr'~Cc-chaim~an i~ his absence, thc next County Commissioner in order of senibnty, and in the absence of any Commissioner: ~ count) ........... ~n '~ ....~ ....... c +~ ~k~ ..... ~' vice ~,h,,; .... c~dcsi~ncc of the County M~ager, ~d in the absence of the County Manager, the Clerk of CouPs, ~d in the Clerk's absence; the Deputy County Manager finds that the threat or d~ger no longer exists ~or until ~ emergency meeting of a quorum of the Bo~d of Co~ty Commissioners cm t~e place ~d te~inate the state of emergency proclmation. (Ord. No. 84-37, ~ 3) Section 38-60. Proclamation. A proclamation decl~ng a state of emergency shall activate the dis~ter emergency pl~s applicable to the co~ty ~d shall be the au~ofity for the use or distribution of ~y supplies, equipment, materials or hcilities ~sembled or ~ged to be m~e avalable p~s~t to such pl~s. (Ord. No. 84-37, ~ 4) Section 38-61. Use of Public Facffifie~ for Shelters. Public facilities, including schools, postsecond~ education flcilities, ~d o~er facilities o~ed or le~ed by ~e state or local govements, but excluding he,it,s or n~sing homes, w~ch ~e suitable for use ~ public hu~c~e evacuation shelters sh~l be made available at the request of the Emergency M~agement Director or Emergency M~agement Director's desi~ee. The Director or the Director's desi~ee sh~l coordinate with the appropriate school bo~d, ~ivemi~, totality college, or local governing board when requesting the use of such hcilifies ~ public hmcme evacuation shelters. Section 38-62. Power of Employees Rendedng Oumide Aid. (1) ~enever ~e ~ployees of~e Cowry ~e rendering md beyond ~e t~tofial bo~dmes of the testy, such employees shall have ~e sac powers, duties, h~ts, pfihleges, ~d i~ities ~ if they were perfoming their duties in ~e County. Words underlined are added; Words z~.:'zk t~-eugh are deleted. t'8[l (2)(a) The political subdivision in which any equipment is used pursuant to this section shall be liable lbr any loss or damage thereto and shall pay ~y expense incurred in the operation and m~:mtcnancc thcreot; No claim tbr such loss, damage, or expense shall be allowed unless an itemized ~,,t~,:.: :t :4~ci~ ciam~ uudcr :~ath is sc~.'cd by mail or othc~visc upon the chief fiscal officer of lbo '.~ ;"he >: iincai ~;ubdivi:m)n which i~¢ aided pursuant io ~his :;ecnon shall :dso pay and ~-cm~lmrsc ~ac C~;tmt) for i~trnistm~g such aid lbr compensauon paid to employees ihmishcd trader section dunng the time of the rendition of such aid and shall dctkay the actual travel and maintenance expenses o f such employees while they are rendering such aid. Such reimbursement shall include any ~ounts paid or due for compensation due to personal injuu or death while such employees ~e engaged in rendering such ~d. The te~ "employee" as used in ~is section me~s, ~d ~e provisions of this section apply with equal effect to, p~d, vol~teer, ~d auxili~ employees ~d emergency management se~ices workers. The sine shall apply for aid rendered to Collier County. Section 38-63. Mutual gd Agreement. (1) The CounW is au~ofized to develop ~d ent~ ~to mull ~d a~eements within ~e state for reciproc~ emergency aid ~d ~sist~ce in case of emergencies too extensive to be dealt with unassisted. Copies of such ageements shall be sent to the Florida Division of Emergency M~agement. Such a~eements shall be consistent with the state comprehensive emergency management pl~ ~d pro,m, ~d in time of emergency it shall be ~e duty of the County to render ~sist~ce in accord~ce with ~e provisions of such mutual ~d a~emmts to ~e fullest possible extent. Section 38-64. Compensation. (1) Compensation for sewices or for ~e ~ing or use ofprope~y shall be owed only to the extent ~at a claimer may not be deemed to have volunteered her or Ms se~ices or prope~ wi~out compensation ~d only to the extent ~at such t~ing exceeds ~e legal respo~ibility of a claimer to render such se~ices or m~e such property so av~lable. (2) Compensation owed for personal services shall be only such as may be fixed by the Florida Division of Emergency Management. (3) Compensation for property shall be owed only if the property was commandeered or otherwise used in coping with an emergency and its use or destruction was ordered by the County. 5- Words underlined are added; Words :m:zl: ~.rm:'gk are deleted. .'8D (4) Any person claiming compensation for the use, damage, loss, or destruction of property shall file a claim therefor with the County utilizing the claim form attached hereto as Exhibit "A". ~', Unless the amount of compensation owed on account of property damaged, lost, or h:~r ,' (~,,1 ~ n_~reed between thc claimant 'ADd ltlC (.'ounty. thc annount of compensation shall be (6) Nothing in this section applies to or authorizes compensation for the destruction or damaging of standing timber or other prope~y in order to provide a firebreak or damage resulting t~om thc relcase of waters or the breach of impoundments in order to reduce pressure or other d~ger from actual or t~emened flood or applies to or authohzes compensation beyond the extent of funds available for such compensmion. Section 38-65. Emergency Orders and Rules. All emergency orders :d roles ~opted by the Coun~ dmng a decl~ed state of emergency shall ~ve the full force ~d effect of law a~er adoption when filed in the office of the Clerk of Co~s or the desi~ee of the Clerk of CouPs. Section 38-66. Enforcement The law enfomment authohties of the County md municip~ities of the County shall enforce the orders ~d roles issued pumu~t to Section 38.65 herein. Section 38-67. Liabili~. ~y person or orgmzatio~ public or phvate, owing or con.oiling real estate or o~ praises who volummly ~d wi~out comp~safion other th~ pa~ent or reimb~sement of costs ~d expmses, ~ts a license or privilege or othe~ise pe~its ~e desi~ation by ~e Cowry Emerg~cy M~agment Depment for use of the whole or any pa~ of such real estate or premises for' ~e p~ose of sheltering persons during ~ actual, impendin~ moc~ or practice mergency, toge~ with her or his successor in interest, iffy, sh~l not be li~le for ~e demh o[ or inj~ to, ~y pe~on on or about such real estate or promises dmng ~e ~ml, impending, mock, or practice ~g~cy, or for loss off or dmage to, the property of such pemom solely by re.on or ~ a result or.ch license, 6- Words underlined ~e added; Wor~ s~a:[: tk:cug5 are deleted. privilege, designation, or use, unless the gross negligence or the willful and wanton misconduct of such person owning or controlling such real estate or premises or her or his successor in interest is the proxnnatc cause oF such death, iniury, loss, or damage occumng during such sheltering period. Any .i.~ct: pcr~;op, ,;F >r~amzatltm 'M~o provides such shelter space tbr compensation shall be deemed to be Scciion .~8-,~8. kuthorized Emergency Measures. !H :~ddit:~>m ~o :lily )thor powers conib~Ted ~}v iil,,V. !lpoll the declaration o~ a state of emcrgenc5 ?lr:;tlan~ ~o h~:¢ ~rticlc. the chaimlan, or vice-chai~an in his absence, ~)r county manager m the :mscnce oF the ctmimmn and vice-chaimmn, may order and promulgate all or any of' thc Ibllowing emergency measures to be effective during the period of such emergency in whole or in pa~, and with such limitation and conditions as he may deem appropdate to protect the health, safety ~d welf~e of the communiW: (1) Suspend or limit the sale, dispensing or ~spo~ation of alcoholic beverages, fire~s, explosives, ~d combustibles. (2) Establish c~ews, including but not limited to the prohibition of or resections on pedes~ ~d vehicul~ movement, st~ding ~d p~ng, exert for the provision of desi~ated, essential s~ices, such ~ fire, police, emergency m~ic~ s~ices ~d hospit~ sewices, including ~e ~spon~ion of patients, utility emergency repots ~d emergency c~ls by ph~ici~s. - (3) Utilize all available resources of ~e county govem~t ~ re~onably necess~ to cope with the dis~ter emergency. ~y single expendit~e exceeding $50,000.00 shall be co- si~ed by the Co~ty Attorney or his or her desi~ee. (4) Emergency m~agement powers; political subdivisions 1. To appropriate ~d expend ~ds; m~e con,acts; obt~n ~d dis~bute equipment, materials, ~d supplies for mergency m~agement p~oses; provide for the he~th ~d safety of persons ~d prope~y, including emergency ~sist~ce to ~e victims of~y emergency; 2. To appoint, employ, remove, or provide, wi~ or wi~out compensation, coordinator, rescue terns, fire ~d police perso~el ~d o~er emergency m~agment workers. (5) Decl~e c~m ~ off limits to all but ~gency pe~o~el. Words underlined are added; Words ........... ~,.. are deleted. (6) Make provisions tbr availability and use of temporary emergency housing and emergency warehousing of materials. !7) Establish emergency operating centers and shelters in addition to or in place of those ~;ro,~ided i'or m thc county'.s emergency plan. ;tiler-;:lIlii{;:; i,)r 311y ptH~osc other Iran t:ookmg, drinking ,:;r bathimg. {~}~ Deciarc lhat during an emergency it 3hail be unla~vfl~l and an otTcnse against thc connt5 ibr any pcrson operating within the coun~ to charge more than the nomml average retail price for any merchandise, goods or se~ices sold during the emergency. The average retail price ~ used herein is defined to be that price at w~ch simil~ merch~dise, goods or se~ices were being sold during the 30 days immediately preceding the emergency or at a m~k-up which is a l~ger percentage over wholesale cost th~ w~ being added to wholesale cost prior to the emergency. (10)Confiscate merch~dise, equipment, vehicles or prope~y needed to alleviate the emergency, with the exception of em~gency vehicles. Reimb~sement shall be within 60 days ~d at custom~ value ch~ged for ~e items dmng 90 days previous to the emergency. (Il)Preceding or dmng the emergency, ~e chaired, ~e hce-chai~, or in their absence, ~e m~ager, shall have the authority to request the Natioml Gu~d or the ~y, Co~t G~d, or o~er law enforcement divisions ~ necess~y to ~sist in ae mitigation of the emergency or to help maintain law ~d order, rescue ~d ~fic consol. (Ord. No. 84-37, ~ 5) (12) Fu~er, the Co~W has the pow~ ~d authority to w~ve the proced~es ~d fomalifi~ o~emse required by law pe~aining to: i. Perfom~ce of public work ~d t~ng whatever pmdmt action is necessa~ to ensue ~e heal~, s~eW, ~d welf~e of~e co~ity. ii. Entering into contact. iii. Inc~ng obligaions. iv. Emplo~ent ofpem~ent ~d tempo~ workers. v. Utilization of volunteer work,s. vi. Rental of equipment. 8- Words ~derl~ed ~e added; Words smazk tk-z:~ ~e deleted. vii. Acquisition and distribution, with or without compensation, of supplies,,.,, materials, and thcilities. viii. Appropriation and expenditure of public thnds. Section 38-69. Declaration, termination by board while in session. '~,i~;il]= ~i ~iI;i ,~J',]CIc ,[littl ~C ,~)llS[i'l!Cti ~; ~lll[ll lit: ,i~[ilOfl[~ ~)~ ~]~C DD~iI(I ~L Section 38-7!i. Penalty lbr violation. Penalties.--Any pcrson violating ~y provision oflhis Emergency Management Code or any rule or order made pursuant to this Emergency M~agement Code is guilty ora misdemeanor of the second degee, p~ishable as provided in Florida Statutes, Sections 775.082 or 775.083. Each day of continued noncompli~ce or violation shall constitute a sep~ate offense. In ~dition to the foregoing, any licensee of ~e counW found guilty of violation ~y provision of this micle, or the emergency me~ures which may be made effective pursuit to ~is ~icle, may have ~s license s~pend~ or revoked by the bo~d of cowry co~issioners. (a) Nothing herein cont~ned shall prevmt the co~ty from t~g such o~ law~l action in ~y coua of competent jurisdiction ~ is necess~ to prevent or remedy ~y re~sal to comply with, or violation on t~s ~icle or ~e emergency me~es which may be m~e effective puget to ~is micle. Such other lawful action shall include but not be limited to ~ equitable action for inj~ctive relief or ~ action at taw for dmages. (Ord. No. 84-37, ~ 7) SECTION TWO: ~CLUSION ~ THE CODE OF LAWS ~ O~ANCES The provisions of ~is ~din~ce shall become ~d be made a pm of ~e Code of Laws md Ordin~ces of Collier CounW, Florida. ~e sections of the Ordin~ce may be renmbered or re- levered to accomplish such, ~d ~e word "ordin~ce" may be ch~ged to "sectiom" "~icle," or ~y o~er approphate word. SECTION ~E: CO~LICT ~ SERVILITY h ~e event ~is Ordin~ce conflicts with ~y o~er ~din~ce of Collier CounW or other applicable law, the more res~ctive shall ~ply. If any phrase or potion of the Ordinance is held invalid or uncor~ti~tional by ~y eom of competent j~sdiction, such potion sh~l be deemed a sep~ate, distinct ~d independent provision md such hold~g shall not ~fect ~e validity of ~e rem~mng potion. 9- Words ~derlined are added; Words s~ack X~zxgh are deleted. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon tiling with the Department of State. ~,\:SSED ..kND Dl'iLk· ADOPTED bv~ the Board of County Commissioners of Coilicr C~mnty, BOARD OF COUNTT COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO[~TY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~ ' ounty Attorney lO- Words underlined are added; Words :m:'ck Ih.rough are deleted. September 19, 2002 Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Amending Chapter 38 Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Friday September 27, 2002 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Carleen A. Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: Account 001-144110-649110 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 38, CIVIL EMERGENCIES, ARTICLE III, DECLARATION OF STATE OF EMERGENCY, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES, ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 84-37, AS AMENDED, AMENDING SECTIONS 38.58 AND 38.59 ADDING TO SUCCESSION OF AUTHORITY TO INCLUDE ALL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AND THE DEPUTY COUNTY MANAGER; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOTEs Ail Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. Ail material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Carleen A. Edwards To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com Amend Chapter 38, Civil Emergencies 8D 09/19/02 Attached herein is advertising for Fri. 9/27/02. Thank you. Amend Chapter Amend Chapter 38.doc 38.doc Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@clerk.collier.fi.us Thursday, September 19, 2002 4:42 PM Carleen A. Edwards Delivery Status Notification (Relay) A'l-F295481.txt Amend Chapter 38, Civil Emerge... This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals@naplesnews.com Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Thursday, September 19, 2002 4:40 PM Carleen A. Edwards Delivered: Amend Chapter 38, Civil Emergencies Amend Chapter 38, Civil Emerge.,. <<Amend Chapter 38, Civil Emergencies>> Your message To: legals@naplesnews.com Subject: Amend Chapter 38, Civil Emergencies Sent: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 16:42:22 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): legals on Thu, 19 Sep 2002 16:40:14 -0400 NapLes DaiLy News NapLes, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication NapLes DaiLy Neus BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHERI LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 00114/,1106491 58526178 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA State of FLorida County of CoLLier Before the undersigned authority, personaLLy appeared B. Lamb, uho on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naptes DaiLy Ne~s, a daily newspaper published at NapLes, in CoLLier County, FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said NapLes DaiLy News is a newspaper published at NapLes, in said CoLLier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said CoLLier County, FLorida, eacE day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in NapLes, in said CoLLier County, FLorida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pubLiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 09/27 AD SPACE: 106.000 INCH ON: 09/27/0~ ...... ,_______--------------------,,"' thla~a of ~00 c'~ PersonaLLy known by me ~1 /~/~D (_ ~~X J OF ~DI- AND AND AN Persons In- lectlon of on a group , be al- wishing to ffnOphlc weeks sub- fo ~he m~erl- tof Any pers~, who decld- ~ to ~l~ae~l a decision of he ~ will need q. re- ;etd of 1be mrtelnlng thereto one herefors,..may need .fo .ecord of pr s mode, which record In~ COLIJER COUNTY, jFL~A~SI~'~COLETTA, CLERK ir ORDINANCE NO. 2002 - 5 0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 38, CIVIL EMERGENCIES, ARTICLE III, DECLARATION OF STATE OF EMERGENCY, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES, ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 84-37, AS AMENDED, AMENDING SECTIONS 38.58 AND 38.59 ADDING TO SUCCESSION OF AUTHORITY TO INCLUDE ALL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AND THE DEPUTY COUNTY MANAGER; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Florida Statutes, Chapter 252 provides for emergency management for Florida counties; and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes, Chapter 252 has been amended from time to time and Collier County desires to have its existing Emergency Management Ordinance conform to the Florida statutory provisions; and WHEREAS, there is a need to clarify certain provisions of the existing Collier County Emergency Management Ordinance in order to better define the extent of the County's emergency management powers; and WHEREAS, certain issues pertaining to rendering outside aid and liability for the use of private property are being provided for herein; and WHEREAS, the intent of the following amendments is to ensure that Collier County is properly prepared in the event of a hurricane or other natural or manmade disaster; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that Collier County Ordinance 84-37, as amended, is further amended as follows: SECTION ONE: Article III. Declaration of State of Emergency, Sections 38-56, through 38-70 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida are amended as follows: Section 38-56. Intent. It is the intent of the county to designate a county official to declare a local state of emergency and to authorize certain actions relating thereto when a quorum of the board of county commissioners is unable to meet. For the purpose of this article, "emergency" is defined as provided in F.S. ch. 252, as follows: any occurrence, or threat thereof, whether accidental, natural or caused by man, in war or in peace, which results or may result in substantial injury or harm to the population or substantial damage to or loss of property. Words underlined are added; Words sir'ac!: t~rcugh are deleted. (Ord. No. 84-37, § 1) Section 38.57. 8B Definitions. (1) "Disaster" means any natural, technological, or civil emergency that causes damage of sufficient severity and magnitude to result in a declaration of a state of emergency by the county, the Governor, or the President of the United States. resulting damage, as follows: (2) Disasters shall be identified by the severity of (3) (4) "Catastrophic disaster" means a disaster that will require massive state and federal assistance, including immediate military involvement. "Major disaster" means a disaster that will likely exceed local capabilities and require a broad range of state and federal assistance. "Minor disaster" means a disaster that is likely to be within the response capabilities of local government and to result in only a minimal need for state or federal assistance. "Division" means the Division of Emergency Management of the Department of Community Affairs, or the successor to that division. "Emergency" means any occurrence, or threat thereof, whether natural, technological, or manmade, in war or in peace, which results or may result in substantial injury or harm to the population or substantial damage to or loss of property. "Emergency management" means the preparation for, the mitigation of, the response to, and the recovery from emergencies and disasters. Specific emergency management responsibilities include, but are not limited to: (a) Reduction of vulnerability of people and communities of this state to damage, injury, and loss of life and property resulting from natural, technological, or manmade emergencies or hostile military of paramilitary action. (b) Preparation for prompt and efficient response and recovery to protect lives and property affected by emergencies. (c) Response to emergencies using all systems, plans, and resources necessary to preserve adequately the health, safety, and welfare of persons or property affected by the emergency. (d) Recovery from emergencies by providing for the rapid and orderly start of restoration and rehabilitation of persons and property affected by emergencies. (a) (b) (c) Words underlined are added; Words struck t~rm:gk are deleted. (e) Provision of an emergency management system embodying all aspects of pre- emergency preparedness and post-emergency response, recovery, and mitigation. (f) Assistance in anticipation, recognition, appraisal, prevention, and mitigation of emergencies which may be caused or aggravated by inadequate planning for and regulation of, public and private facilities and land use. (5) Emergency Management Department means the County department created in accordance with the provisions of Florida law to discharge the emergency management responsibilities and functions of Collier County. (6) "Manmade emergency" means an emergency caused by an action against persons or society, including, but not limited to, enemy attack, sabotage, terrorism, civil unrest, or other action impairing the orderly administration of government. (7) "Natural emergency" means an emergency caused by a natural event, including, but not limited to, a hurricane, a storm, a flood, severe wave action, a drought, or an earthquake. (8) The Director of the Office of Emergency Management is the county official having the responsibility to execute the emergency management plan in Collier County and shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Director". Section 38-58. Officer designated to declare emergency. Pursuant to F.S. ch. 252, which authorizes the waiver of procedures and formalities otherwise required of political subdivisions to take whatever prudent action is necessary to ensure the health, safety and welfare of the community in the event of a state of emergency, when a quorum of the board of county commission is unable to meet, the chairman of the board of county commissioners, or the vice-chairman in his or her absence, and in the absence of the chairman and vice-chairman; the next County Commissioner in order of seniority, or if two or more were appointed on the same date, then in alphabetical order among them; and in the absence of any Commissioner; o~ the eCounty Manager, in the absence of the County_ Manager; o~ ~-'~,,,, ---,o,e,,,-,,~'4~°~ .... ~f the Clerk of Courts; and in the Clerk's absence the Deputy County Manager is are hereby designated and empowered to declare a local state of emergency whenever he the designated person, according to the above order of preference shall determine that a natural or manmade disaster has occurred or that the occurrence or threat of one is imminent and requires immediate and expeditious action. (Ord. 84-37, § 2) 3- Words underlined are added; Words struck t~mug~ are deleted. 8D Section 38-59. Extent of Statement of Emergency. A state of emergency shall be declared by proclamation of the chairman, or the vice chairman in his or her absence, and in the absence of the chairman and vice chairman; thc next County Commissioner in order of seniority, or if two or more were appointed on the same date, then in alphabetical order among them, and in the absence of any Commissioner; ~ the ~County mM__anager, in the absence of the County Manager; the Clerk of Courts; and in thc Clerk's absence; o~ ~',, ~'~ ~: ..... ~ the Deputy County Manager. Thc state of emergency shall continue for seven (7) days and may be extended in seven (7) day increments until the chairman, or vice-chairman in his absence, the next County Commissioner in order of seniority, or if two or more were appointed on the same date, then in alphabetical order among them, and in the absence of any Commissioner; oF c-oumy mat,,age~ ;" ~'~ "~' ......~ ,t.~ ..~..: ..... a .,:..~ ~.n:~.. or_deaignee ~ the County Manager, and in the absence of the County Manager, the Clerk of Courts, and in the Clerk's absence; the Deputy County Manager finds that the threat or danger no longer exists and/or until an emergency meeting of a quorum of the Board of County Commissioners can take place and terminate the state of emergency proclamation. (Ord. No. 84-37, § 3) Section 38-60. Proclamation. A proclamation declaring a state of emergency shall activate the disaster emergency plans applicable to the county and shall be the authority for the use or distribution of any supplies, equipment, materials or facilities assembled or arranged to be made available pursuant to such plans. (Ord. No. 84-37, § 4) Section 38-61. Use of Public Facilities for Shelters. Public facilities, including schools, postsecondary education facilities, and other facilities owned or leased by the state or local governments, but excluding hospitals or nursing homes, which are suitable for use as public hurricane evacuation shelters shall be made available at the request of the Emergency Management Director or Emergency Management Director's designee. The Director or the Director's designee shall coordinate with the appropriate school board, university, community college, or local governing board when requesting the use of such facilities as public hurricane evacuation shelters. Section 38-62. Power of Employees Rendering Outside Aid. Words underlined are added; Words struck t~roug~ are deleted. (1) Whenever the employees of the County are rendering aid beyond the territorial boundaries of the county, such employees shall have the same powers, duties, rights, privileges, and immunities as if they were performing their duties in the County. (2)(a) The political subdivision in which any equipment is used pursuant to this section shall be liable for any loss or damage thereto and shall pay any expense incurred in the operation and maintenance thereof. No claim for such loss, damage, or expense shall be allowed unless an itemized notice of such claim under oath is served by mail or otherwise upon the chief fiscal officer of the political subdivision in which the equipment was used within 60 days after the loss, damage, or expense is sustained or incurred. (b) The political subdivision which is aided pursuant to this section shall also pay and reimburse the County for furnishing such aid for compensation paid to employees furnished under this section during the time of the rendition of such aid and shall defray the actual travel and maintenance expenses of such employees while they are rendering such aid. Such reimbursement shall include any amounts paid or due for compensation due to personal injury or death while such employees are engaged in rendering such aid. The term "employee" as used in this section means, and the provisions of this section apply with equal effect to, paid, volunteer, and auxiliary employees and emergency management services workers. The same shall apply for aid rendered to Collier County. Section 38-63. Mutual Aid Agreements. (1) The County is authorized to develop and enter into mutual aid agreements within the state for reciprocal emergency aid and assistance in case of emergencies too extensive to be dealt with unassisted. Copies of such agreements shall be sent to the Florida Division of Emergency Management. Such agreements shall be consistent with the state comprehensive emergency management plan and program, and in time of emergency it shall be the duty of the County to render assistance in accordance with the provisions of such mutual aid agreements to the fullest possible extent. Section 38-64. Compensation. (1) Compensation for services or for the taking or use of property shall be owed only to the extent that a claimant may not be deemed to have volunteered her or his services or property without compensation and only to the extent that such taking exceeds the legal responsibility of a claimant to render such services or make such property so available. - 5- Words underlined are added; Words struck t~r,~:g~ are deleted. (2) Compensation owed for personal services shall be only such as may be fixed by the Florida Division of Emergency Management. (3) Compensation for property shall be owed only if the property was commandeered or otherwise used in coping with an emergency and its use or destruction was ordered by the County. (4) Any person claiming compensation for the use, damage, loss, or destruction of property shall file a claim therefor with the County utilizing the claim form attached hereto as Exhibit "A". (5) Unless the amount of compensation owed on account of property damaged, lost, or destroyed is agreed between the claimant and the County, the amount of compensation shall be calculated in the same manner as compensation due for a taking of property pursuant to the condemnation laws of this state except that if a party making a claim pursuant to this provision who disagrees with the amount of compensation offered by the County shall bear its own costs and attorney fees. (6) Nothing in this section applies to or authorizes compensation for the destruction or damaging of standing timber or other property in order to provide a firebreak or damage resulting from the release of waters or the breach of impoundments in order to reduce pressure or other danger from actual or threatened flood or applies to or authorizes compensation beyond the extent of funds available for such compensation. Section 38-65. Emergency Orders and Rules. All emergency orders and rules adopted by the County during a declared state of emergency shall have the full force and effect of law after adoption when filed in the office of the Clerk of Courts or the designee of the Clerk of Courts. Section 38-66. Enforcement. The law enforcement authorities of the County and municipalities of the County shall enforce the orders and rules issued pursuant to Section 38.65 herein. Section 38-67. Liability. Any person or organization, public or private, owning or controlling real estate or other premises who voluntarily and without compensation other than payment or reimbursement of costs and expenses, grants a license or privilege or otherwise permits the designation by the County Emergency Management Department for use of the whole or any part of such real estate or premises for the 6- Words underlined are added; Words struck thr.vugk are deleted. purpose of sheltering persons during an actual, impending, mock, or practice emergency, together with her or his successor in interest, if any, shall not be liable for the death of, or injury to, any person on or about such real estate or premises during the actual, impending, mock, or practice emergency, or for loss of, or damage to, the property of such person, solely by reason or as a result of such license, privilege, designation, or use, unless the gross negligence or the willful and wanton misconduct of such person owning or controlling such real estate or premises or her or his successor in interest is the proximate cause of such death, injury, loss, or damage occurring during such sheltering period. Any such person or organization who provides such shelter space for compensation shall be deemed to be an instrumentality of the State or the County where applicable, for the purposes of F.S. 768.28. Section 38-68. Authorized Emergency Measures. In addition to any other powers conferred by law, upon the declaration of a state of emergency pursuant to this article, the chairman, or vice-chairman in his or her absence, and in the absence of the chairman and vice-chairman; the next County Commissioner in order of seniority, or if two or more were appointed on the same date, then in alphabetical order among them, and in the absence of any Commissioner; o~ the County manager, in the absence of the County Manager; the Clerk of Courts; and in the Clerk's absence; the Deputy County Manager '~'~.... v.,,.,....-,,"~'~; ..... ~,.,..'~ .,~,.~..,~.~ v,,.-....,-,.,~'n;~" may order and promulgate all or any of the following emergency measures to be effective during the period of such emergency in whole or in part, and with such limitation and conditions as he may deem appropriate to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community: (1) Suspend or limit the sale, dispensing or transportation of alcoholic beverages, firearms, explosives, and combustibles. (2) Establish curfews, including but not limited to the prohibition of or restrictions on pedestrian and vehicular movement, standing and parking, except for the provision of designated, essential services, such as fire, police, emergency medical services and hospital services, including the transportation of patients, utility emergency repairs and emergency calls by physicians. (3) Utilize all available resources of the county government as reasonably necessary to cope with the disaster emergency. Any single expenditure exceeding $50,000.00 shall be co- signed by the County Attorney or his or her designee. (4) Emergency management powers; political subdivisions 1. To appropriate and expend funds; make contracts; obtain and distribute equipment, materials, and supplies for emergency management purposes; 7- Words underlined are added; Words struck thm',:gh are deleted. o provide for the health and safety of persons and property, including emergency assistance to the victims of any emergency; To appoint, employ, remove, or provide, with or without compensation, coordinators, rescue teams, fire and police personnel and other emergency management workers. (5) Declare certain areas off limits to all but emergency personnel. (6) Make provisions for availability and use of temporary emergency warehousing of materials. emergency housing and (7) Establish emergency operating centers and shelters in addition to or in place of those provided for in the county's emergency plan. (8) Declare that during an emergency it shall be unlawful and an offense against the county for any person to use the fresh water supplied by the county, or local municipalities or other entities for any purpose other than cooking, drinking or bathing. (9) Declare that during an emergency it shall be unlawful and an offense against the county for any person operating within the county to charge more than the normal average retail price for any merchandise, goods or services sold during the emergency. The average retail price as used herein is defined to be that price at which similar merchandise, goods or services were being sold during the 30 days immediately preceding the emergency or at a mark-up which is a larger percentage over wholesale cost than was being added to wholesale cost prior to the emergency. (10)Confiscate merchandise, equipment, vehicles or property needed to alleviate the emergency, with the exception of emergency vehicles. Reimbursement shall be within 60 days and at customary value charged for the items during 90 days previous to the emergency. (Il)Preceding or during the emergency, the chairman, the vice-chairman, or in their absence, the manager, shall have the authority to request the National Guard or the Army, Coast Guard, or other law enforcement divisions as necessary to assist in the mitigation of the emergency or to help maintain law and order, rescue and traffic control. (Ord. No. 84-37, § 5) (12) Further, the County has the power and authority to waive the procedures and formalities otherwise required by law pertaining to: Words underlined are added; Words~.. ...... ~..~ *~'.,.. ..... v~,.~' are deleted. i. Performance of public work and taking whatever prudent action is necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the community. ii. Entering into contracts. iii. Incurring obligations. iv. Employment of permanent and temporary workers. v. Utilization of volunteer workers. vi. Rental of equipment. vii. Acquisition and distribution, with or without compensation, of supplies, materials, and facilities. viii. Appropriation and expenditure of public funds. Section 38-69. Declaration, termination by board while in session. Nothing in this article shall be construed to limit the authority of the board of county commissioners from declaring or terminating a state of emergency and taking any action authorized by law when sitting in regular or special session. (Ord. No. 84-37, § 6) Section 38-70. Penalty for violation. Penalties.--Any person violating any provision of this Emergency Management Code or any rule or order made pursuant to this Emergency Management Code is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in Florida Statutes, Sections 775.082 or 775.083. Each day of continued noncompliance or violation shall constitute a separate offense. In addition to the foregoing, any licensee of the county found guilty of violation any provision of this article, or the emergency measures which may be made effective pursuant to this article, may have his license suspended or revoked by the board of county commissioners. (a) Nothing herein contained shall prevent the county from taking such other lawful action in any court of competent jurisdiction as is necessary to prevent or remedy any refusal to comply with, or violation of, this article or the emergency measures which may be made effective pursuant to this article. Such other lawful action shall include but not be limited to an equitable action for injunctive relief or an action at law for damages. (Ord. No. 84-37, § 7) SECTION TWO: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re- Words underlined are added; Words stn:zk t~r.~'ag~ are deleted. lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to section, "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION THREE: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this~l., ay of(~~t~ 2002. D?iGHT E. B.,ROCK, Clerk Att l Cha 1. '1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER C~ BY: M~N - JA . COLETTA, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: J~queli~e Hubbard Robinson A~istant County Attorney 10- Words underlined are added; Words struck t,h.r,m:'g~ are deleted. 8D STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2002-50 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 8th day of October, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 9th day of October, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK --3~-.. Clerk of Courts and Clerk~ Ex-officio to Board 'of~, ~' County Commissioners - By: Ellie Hof fman, Deputy Clerk COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: .~. Normal legal Advertisement (Display Adv., location, etc.) =Other: ISF Petition No. (If none, give brief description): Petitioner: (Name & Address): Name & Address of any person(s)to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) ~t402~ -2-¼ q q~ Hearing before Q BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appearing 10 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): ~ Naples Daily News [] Other Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: ~0~L\C- %~,~'x~et~.~ )Legally Required Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? ~ Yes [] No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: oror List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE O]NLY;~ Date Received: ~/~_~/~ Date of Public hearing: /0~//~ Date Advertised: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO AMEND COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES, SECTION 66-116, CREATING STRICTER ENFORCEMENT OF PUBLIC SWIMMING POOLS CURRENTLY EXEMPT UNDER FLORIDA STATUTES. OBJECTIVE: To provide safer public facilities for the community. CONSIDERATION: Florida Statute 514 and Administrative Code for Public Pools Construction and Operational Standards, 64E-9 allow for exemptions from regular inspections primarily to public pools serving less than 32 living units. The Department of Health (DOH) estimates that there are approximately 350 such pools in Collier County that are not permitted or inspected by DOH. It is believed that many of these pools are operating without certain safety provisions and with substandard water quality. More specifically, many of these exempt pools are operating with direct suction systems, with no relief tank. If a pool operates with such a system and has a broken drain grate, a swimmer can become trapped within the main drain, causing catastrophic injury or death. Similarly, there are many other health and safety issues that can present operational hazards for the casual swimmer as well. These issues can be minimized if the pools are inspected on a regular basis by trained staff. These inspections will also provide the user with a level of reliance that the water quality meets standards. Presently, these pools are not monitored; however, there is a belief from the users that their pool is inspected. To accommodate these concems and to provide the public with better health and safety provisions, the Collier County Health Department recommends that exemptions be removed for all existing and new public pools. Attached are the proposed language changes to Article V. Public Swimming Pools, Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Section 66-116. Implementation of these changes will translate into: · CCHD'S permitting and inspection of all public pools in Collier County. Approximately 1600 existing pools shall be inspected 2-4 times/year. Construction of all new public pools shall be required to have construction plan reviews and installation inspections by the CCHD. Commercial grade products and all applicable safety features shall be required on all new construction. Certain safety violations, resulting from un-inspected and non-engineered pools, are anticipated at existing exempt pools. The DOH will work with the owners of these facilities to resolve issues. The added workload will require an additional 1.5 inspectors. The permitting fees from the exempt pools shall provide the revenue for these additional inspection services. Economic Impact of this program change will be $255/year for each exempt pool to obtain an operating permit and to have DOH provide inspection and water quality testing services. With each pool serving an average of 15 units and 2 people per unit, the average cost to the individual customer for this service is estimated at $8.50/year. Assuming there are 350 exempt pools currently in existence in Collier County, the additional revenue generated will be $89,250/year. These funds shall be utilized to offset the cost of the inspections including: 1.5 inspectors, water quality testing, inspection vehicles, and associated expenses. Similarly to the sign ex)de change several years ago, staff anticipates that pool owners will be concerned with the economic burden of retrofitting older pools to the new code. To address this issue, language provisions will be added to the ordinance providing for affording a schedule, for older pools to comply with the code as long as there is no immediate health / safety risk to the user. If the Board directs staff to proceed with this amendment, the proposed Ordinance will be presented to the Development Services Advisory Committee for recommendation prior to the Public Hearing. GROWTH MANAGEMENT: Growth Management Plan. This Ordinance does not impact the County's FISCAL IMPACT: There is no immediate fiscal impact at this time. However, once the Ordinance is adopted, it is anticipated that annual revenues in the amount of $89,250 will be raised to offset the expense of inspections. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the County Attorney to amend the Code of Laws and Ordinances, Section 66-116 as recommended, and advertise said changes for Public Hearing. PREPARED BY~ Thomas G. Walker, PE Environmental Health & Engineering Administrator Collier County Health Department DATE: jor. Joan C°lfer, D~rector/ ' ' llier County Health D6partment 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29' 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ORDINANCE NO. 2002- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAW AND ORDINANCES CHAPTER 66, HEALTH AND SANITATION, ARTICLE V, PUBLIC SWIMMING 'POOLS, ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE 77-$1, AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 99-65; AMENDING SECTION 66-119, PERTAINING TO SWIMMING POOL WATER QUALITY AND SAFETY; AMENDING SECTION 66-121, PERTAINING TO VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION INTO THE COUNTY'S CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, including its respective municipalities, has the highest percentage of "exempt" public swimming pools in the State of Florida; and WHEREAS, a recent survey of "exempt" pools by the Collier County Health Department has revealed that significant health and safety concerns exist with regard to the construction, operation, and maintenance of such pools; and WHEREAS, adopting limited regulations that are more restrictive than the "exempt" pool provisions contained in Chapter 514, F.S.,~within Collier County so the new and existing public pools will be in compliance with the Florida Administrative Code (FAC) 64E-9, pertaining to operational and permitting requirements for such pools will serve and promote a public purpose; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to eliminate the requirement for a performance plan review for "exempt" pools to further that public purpose; and WHEREAS, it is also necessary to require those seeking to construct a public swimming pool to obtain a construction permit and comply with the requirement of FAC 64E-9, except for section 16(1). NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the board of county commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: The text of the following sections of Chapter 66, Health and Sanitation, of Article V, Public Swimming Pools, of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, are amended by ~the text which follows where underlined words reflect new text and ~,~.ot. ~ ..... t. words reflect deleted text: Sec. 66-116. Regulations incorporated by reference and definitions. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 (a) The provisions and definitions of Chapter 64E-9 of the Florida Administrative Code in effect on the effective date of this article, and future amendments to Chapter 64E-9 or to any successor in function to Chapter 64E-9 which regulates public swimming pools and/or public bathing places are incorporated by reference into this article as though set out fully herein. (b) For the purpose of this article, the following terms are defined: Health department shall mean the county health department, a subdivision of the Florida Department Of Health. Public swimming pool shall mean any swimming pool, spa-type pool, wading pool, special purpose pool, or water recreation attraction, together with buildings, appurtenances and equipment used in connection therewith. A public swimming pool, where admission is gained with or without payment of any fee for admission, operated by or serving a camp, church, city, county, day care center, group home facility for eight or more clients, health spa, institution, park, state or federal agency, school, subdivision; or cooperative type living project of five or more living units, such as an apartment or condominium, boarding house, mobile home park, recreational vehicle park, townhouse, or transient living location (such as a motel or hotel) or where the public is allowed to swim. Course shall mean a course of study in the care, maintenance and operation of public swimming pools as the course is approved and administered by the health department. Transient lodging shall mean a building, facility, or portion thereof (excluding inpatient medical care facilities) which contains one or more dwelling units or sleeping accommodations, including, but not limited to, a resort, group home, hotel, motel, or dormitory. Barrier shall mean fence, wall, building wail, or combination thereof, which completely or surrounds the swimming pool and obstructs unauthorized access to/or from the swimming pool. (Ord. No. 77-51, § 1; Ord. No. 99-65, § 1, 9-14-99) Sec. 66-117. Pool operator's certificate. (a) From the effective date of this article, it shall be unlawful for any person, corporation, partnership, association or other legal entity to operate and/or maintain a public swimming pool unless and until some person directly responsible for the maintenance and care of such swimming pool shall first obtain a pool operator's certificate from the health department, which must be displayed at the pool area. The pool shall have daily maintenance and records of the daily maintenance must be retained on the pool site for review by the health department. (b) All persons engaged in public swimming pool services or maintenance must acquire a pool operator's certificate from the health department. Pool service contractors holding a current license to operate issued by the county or by the State of Florida are excluded from this requirement. All pool service contractors must be prepared, upon oral request by the health department., to immediately present this license at the pool for inspection. (Ord. No. 77-51, § 2; Ord. No. 99-65, § 2, 9-14-99) See. 66-118. Procedure for obtaining a pool operator's certificate. (a) All applications for a pool operator's certificate shall be made and filed with the 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 health department. The health department shall prescribe the form of application and make such investigation concerning all applications filed as it shall deem necessary. (b) A pool operator's certificate shall be issued by the health department to all applicants who shall first present evidence of satisfactory completion of an approved course in the care, maintenance and operation of public swimming pools. A $20.00 fee shall be charged for the issuance of each pool operator's certificate. (c) Upon payment of a fee of $20.00, any applicant may elect to challenge the final examination instead of completing the course. If the examination is passed, a pool operator's certificate shall be issued. If the examination is failed, the course must be completed before re-examination and the course fee must be paid. The pool operator's certificate will be valid for three years and may be reissued upon payment of an additional fee of $20.00. Certificates valid on the effective date of this article will remain valid until September 30, 2001. (d) A pool operator's certificate issued pursuant to section 66-118(b) of this article shall be valid for the time periods specified in subsection (c), above unless sooner revoked for cause by the health department. Continued violation of any provision of the Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 64E-9, as amended, shall be prima facie grounds for revocation of the pool operator's certificate. The certificate may be declared invalid if the holder does not attend a refresher course as prescribed by the health department. Such refresher courses shall not be required more frequently than annually. (e) In lieu of a pool operator's certificate, a provisional certificate will be issued for an indi- vidual on registration for the course. This provisional certificate will be valid until the date of satisfactory completion of the course, or for six months, whichever occurs first. (f) A fee of $50.00 shall be charged by the health department for all of the following: Pro- cessing applications, issuing a certificate, conducting the course and supplying the required educational materials. (Ord. No. 77-51, § 3; Ord. No. 99-65, § 3, 9-14-99) Sec. 66-119. Swimming Pool Water Quality and Safety (a) The health department will conduct unannounced inspections o~ public swimming pools (including water sampling) at least two times per year but not more frequently than four times per year for each pool. Each water sample shall be analyzed for .bacterial contamination. Upon a positive reading of the sample, the pool owner or owner~' representative will be notified of the positive reading. The swimming pool and adjacent areas shall be immediately posted as being "closed" and shall remain closed until completion of the then required superchlorination procedures. Co) In the event of fecal contamination of any pool water, the health department must be noti- fied immediately by the staff of the swimming pool; and the pool and adjacent area shall immediately be posted as "closed." All solids must be removed; filters must be backwashed and be thoroughly cleaned, and the pool shall be superchlorinated to 20 parts per million. The chlorine level shall be checked to assure that it meets the then applicable minimum standards before the pool is reopened. (c) Any pool, on inspection, that is found to be in violation of the Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 64E-9, or that is creating a public health hazard shall be closed by the health department until corrections are made and such corrections are verified by a re-inspection. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 (d) The ex~mpti0n provisions contained in Sections 514,0115 (1) - (4), Florida Statutes, ~-~ they may be amended 'from ~;im~ to time. relating to public swimming pools, specifically including, but not limited to. those serving condominiums or C~Ooperativ¢ living units, do not apply within Collier County, Existing and now public swimming pools, as defined h©r~in, are and will be subject to $h~ operational and permitting requirements of the Floridn Administrative Code (FAC), 64E-9. (d .e.) A fee of $180.00 shall be charged annually by the health department for the above-specified pool water sampling and analysis, and an additional annual fee of $75.00 will be charged for permitting and inspection services required by applicable regul~tions. (Ord. No. 77-51, § 4; Ord. No. 99-65, § 4, 9-14-99) State law reference~Penalty for ordinance violations, F.S. § 125.69. Sec. 66-120. Plumbing inspections. (a) A health department engineer shall perform inspections onthe plumbing for each planned public swimming pool to verify compliance with the approved engineered plans. Upon completion of the plumbing installation, the pool contractor must contact the health department's engineer for inspection before hydraulically compacting the backfill around the pool. (b) A fee of $50.00 shall be charged by the health department for each such plumbing inspec- tion. When compliance with the inspection has been established, the health department will issue written confirmation of same as no extra charge. (Ord. No. 99-65, § 5, 9-14-99) Sec. 66-121. Violations. (a) Violation of any of the provisions of this article may be punished as provided by law. Each day such violation is committed or permitted to continue shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such thereafter. (b) It shall be a violation of this article to commence any construction, modification, or re- surfacing of a public swimming pool or any adjacent deck adjacent without obtaining prior written approval to do so from the health department. (c) Each spa located within a pool/spa combination and the pool having a water capacity of 25,000 gallons or more, or where the pool is within (or is a component part of) transient lodg- ing, shall comply with Subsection 64E-9.O10, Florida Administrative Code, as now exists or amended hereafter (or its successor in function) which now reads: "Oxidation reduction potential" (ORP) controllers shall be provided on spa pools to assist in maintaining proper disinfection levels." Such ORP/PH controllers must be installed by or on behalf of the pool owner (at no cost to the county) within one year following the effective date of this article. (d) Each person seeking to construct a public swimming pool .......... ~- .... t:~ fzr 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 ? 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3O 31 32 obtain a construction permit, and tho plans for such pools must comply with FAC Chapter 64E-9, except for section 16 (e) A civil frae of $500.00 shall be paid for each first violation of any provision of this article. A fine of $1,000.00 shall be paid for a second violation of this article by the same pool facility within any 360 days of the effective date of the first violation. In addition, enforcement of this article may be accomplished by applying section 1-6 of the county's Code of Ordinances. (Ord. No. 99-65, § 6, 9-14-99) Sec. 66-122. Fees. Fees specified in this article may be revised from time-to-time by resolution of the board of county commissioners. (Ord. No. 99-65, § 7, 9-14-99) SECTION TWO: Inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances: The provisions of this ordinance are intended to become and to be made part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re-lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION THREE: Conflict and severance. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive provisions are intended to apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion is deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding will not affect the validity of the remaining portion. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 SECTION FOUR: Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ,2002 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Deputy Clerk Approved as to form~ufficiency: Patrick G. White Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: James N. Colletta, Chairman ORDINANCE NO. 2002- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAW AND ORDINANCES CHAPTER 66, HEALTH AND SANITATION, ARTICLE V, PUBLIC SWIMMING POOLS, ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE 77-51, AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 99-65; AMENDING SECTION 66-119, PERTAINING TO SWIMMING POOL WATER QUALITY AND SAFETY; AMENDING SECTION 66-121, 'PERTAINING TO VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION INTO THE COUNTY'S CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, including its respective municipalities, has the highest percentage of "exempt" public swimming pools in the State of Florida; and WHEREAS, a recent survey of"exempt" pools by the Collier County Health Department has revealed that significant health and safety concerns exist with regard to the construction, operation, and maintenance of such pools; and WHEREAS, adopting limited regulations that are more restrictive than the "exempt" pool provisions contained in Chapter 514, F.S., within Collier County so the new and existing public pools will be in compliance with the Florida Administrative Code (FAC) 64E-9, pertaining to operational and permitting requirements for such pools will serve and promote a public purpose; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to eliminate the requirement for a performance plan review for "exempt" pools to further that public purpose; and WHEREAS, it is also necessary to require those seeking to construct a public swimming pool to obtain a construction permit and comply with the requirement of FAC 64E-9, except for section 16(1). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The text of the following sections of Chapter 66, Health and Sanitation, of Article V, Public Swimming Pools, of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, are amended by the text which follows where underlined words reflect new text ando.~'~'~t'...~...~.~.~.....tv.~, words reflect deleted text: Sec. 66-116. Regulations incorporated by reference and definitions. (a) The provisions and definitions of Chapter 64E-9 of the Florida Administrative Code in effect on the effective date of this article, and future amendments to Chapter 64E-9 or to any successor in function to Chapter 64E-9 which regulates public swimming pools and/or public bathing places are incorporated by reference into this article as though set out fully herein. (b) For thc purpose of this article, thc following tcrms arc defined: ~ Health department shall mean the county health department, a subdivision of the Florida Department Of Health. Public swimming pool shall mean any swimming pool, spa-type pool, wading pool, special purpose pool, or water recreation attraction, together with buildings, appurtenances and equipment used in connection therewith. A public swimming pool, where admission is gained with or without payment of any fee for admission, operated by or serving a camp, church, city, county, day care center, group home facility for eight or more clients, health spa, institution, park, state or federal agency, school, subdivision; or cooperative type living project of five or more living units, such as an apartment or condominium, boarding house, mobile home park, recreational vehicle park, townhouse, or transient living location (such as a motel or hotel) or where the public is allowed to swim. Course shall mean a course of study in the care, maintenance and operation of public swimming pools as the course is approved and administered by the health department. Transient lodging shall mean a building, facility, or portion thereof (excluding inpatient medical care facilities) which contains one or more dwelling units or sleeping accommodations, including, but not limited to, a resort, group ~home, hotel, motel, or dormitory. Barrier shall mean fence, wall, building wail, or combination thereof, which completely or surrounds the swimming pool and obstructs unauthorized access to/or from the swimming pool. (Ord. No. 77-51, § 1; Ord. No. 99-65, § 1, 9-14-99) Sec. 66-117. Pool operator's certificate. (a) From the effective date of this article, it shall be unlawful for any person, corporation, partnership, association or other legal entity to operate and/or maintain a public swimming pool unless and until some person directly responsible for the maintenance and care of such swimming pool shall first obtain a pool operator's certificate from the health department, which must be displayed at the pool area. The pool shall have daily maintenance and records of the daily maintenance must be retained on the pool site for review by the health department. CO) All persons engaged in public swimming pool services or maintenance must acquire a pool operator's certificate from the health department. Pool servi~:e contractors holding a current license to operate issued by the coUnty or by the State of Florida are excluded from this requirement. All pool service contractors must be prepared, upon oral request by the health department., to immediately present this license at the pool for inspection. (Ord. No. 77-51, § 2; Ord. No. 99-65, § 2, 9-14-99) Sec. 66-118. Procedure for obtaining a pool operator's certificate. (a) All applications for a pool operator's certificate shall be made and filed with the health department. The health department shall prescribe the form of application and make such investigation concerning all applications filed as it shall deem necessary. Co) A pool operator's certificate shall be issued by the health department to all applicants who shall first present evidence of satisfactory completion of an approved course in the care, maintenance and operation of public swimming pools. A $20.00 fee. shall be charged for the issuance of each pool operator's certificate. , (c) Upon payment of a fee of $20.00, any applicant may elect to challenge thc final examination instead of completing the course. If the examination is passed, a pool operator's certificate shall be issued. If the examination is failed, the course must be completed before re-examination and thc course fee must be paid. The pool operator's certificate will be valid for three years and may be reissued upon payment of an additional fee of $20.00. Certificates valid on the effective date of this article will remain valid until September 30, 2001. (d) A pool operator's certificate issued pursuant to section 66-118(b) of this article shall be valid for the time periods specified in subsection (c), above unless sooner revoked for cause by the health department. Continued violation of any provision of the Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 64E-9, as amended, shall be prima facie grounds for revocation of the pool operator's certificate. The certificate may be declared invalid if the holder does not attend a refresher course as prescribed by the health department. Such refresher courses shall not be required more frequently than annually. (e) In lieu of a pool operator's certificate, a provisional certificate will be issued for an indi- vidual on registration for the course. This provisional certificate will be valid until the date of satisfactory completion of the course, or for six months, whichever occurs first. (f) A fee of $50.00 shall be charged by the health department for all of the following: Pro- cessing applications, issuing a certificate, conducting the course and supplying the required educational materials. (Ord. No. 77-51, § 3; Ord. No. 99-65, § 3, 9-14-99) Sec. 66-119. Swimming Pool Water Quality and Safety (a) The health department will conduct unannounced inspections of public swimming pools (including water sampling) at least two times per year but not more frequently than four times per year for each pool. Each water sample shall be analyzed for bacterial contamination. Upon a positive reading of the sample, the pool owner or owners' representative will be notified of the positive reading. The swimming pool and adjacent areas shall be immediately posted as being "closed" and shall remain closed until completion of the then required superchlorination procedures. (b) In the event of fecal contamination of any pool water, the health department must be noti- fied immediately by the staff of the swimming pool; and the pool and adjacent area shall immediately be posted as "closed." All solids must be removed; filters must be backwashed and be thoroughly cleaned, and the pool shall be superchlorinated to 20 parts per million. The chlorine level shall be chocked to assure that it meets the then applicable minimum standards before the pool is reopened. (c) Any pool, on inspection, that is found to be in violation of the Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 64E-9, or that is creating a public health hn,nrd shall be closed by the health department until corrections are made and such corrections are verified by a re-inspection. (d) The exemption provisions contained in Sections 514.0115 (1) - (4), Florida Statutes, as they may be amended from time to time, relating to public swimming pools, specifically inciuding, but not limited to, those serving condominiums or cooperative living units, do not apply within Collier County_. Existing and new public swimming pools, as defined herein, are ~d will be subject to the operational and permitting requirements of the Florida Administrative Code (FAC), 64E-9. (d e_) A fee of $180.00 shall be charged annually by the health department for the above-specified pool water sampling and analysis, and an additional annual fee of $75.00 will be charged for permitting and inspection services required by applicable regulations. (Ord. No. 77-51, § 4; Ord. No. 99-65, § 4, 9-14-99) State law reference--Penalty for ordinance violations, F.S. § 125.69. ~ Sec. 66-120. Plumbing inspections. (a) A health department engineer shall perform inspections on the plumbing for each planned public swimming pool to verify compliance with the approved engineered plans. Upon completion of the plumbing installation, the pool contractor must contact the health department's engineer for inspection before hydraulically compacting the backfill around the pool. (b) A fee of $50.00 shall be charged by the health department for each such plumbing inspec- tion. When compliance with the inspection has been established, the health department will issue written confirmation of same as no extra charge. (Ord. No. 99-65, § 5, 9-14-99) Sec. 66-121. ViolatiOns. (a) Violation of any of the provisions of this article may be punished as provided by law. Each day such violation is committed or permitted to continue shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such thereafter. (b) It shall be a violation of this article to commence any construction, modification, or re- surfacing of a public swimming pool or any adjacent deck adjacent without obt_oinJng prior written approval to do so from the health department. (c) Each spa located within a pool/spa combination and the pool having a water capacity of 25,000 gallons or more, or where the pool is within (or is a component part of) transient lodg- ing, shall comply with Subsection 64E-9.O10, Florida Administrative Code, as now exists or amended hereafter (or its successor in function) which now reads: "Oxidation reduction potential" (OR.P) controllers shall be provided on spa pools to assist in maintaining proper disinfection levels." Such ORP/PH controllers must be installed by or on behalf of the pool o.wner (at no cost to the county) within one year following the effective date of this article. (d) Each person seeking to construct a public swimming pool o;vner '::he, applies for 3 ' 8F d~amm~r~ ~ .... ~ ........ ' ....... : ...... ~ +N~ ~-~, · · pply for and obt~n a const~cfion permit, and the plans for such pools must compl? with FAC Chapter 64~-9, except for $eaion 15 (e) A ci~l fmc of $500.00 s~l be p~d for ~h tim violation of ~y provision of ~cle. A fine of $1,000.00 s~l be p~d for a ~cond ~o~fion of ~is ~icle by the pool f~ility wi~in ~y 360 ~ys of ~ eff~ive da~ of ~e tim ~olafion. h ~difio~ e~orcem~nt of ~is ~cle ~y be acwmplished by appl~nt s~fion l~ of ~e count's C~e of O~i~es. (o~. No. ~$, ~ ~, ~-14-~) Sec. 66-122. Fees. Fees specified in this article may be revised from time-to-time by resolution of the board of county commissioners. (Ord. No. 99-65, § 7, 9-14-99) SECTION TWO: Inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances: The provisions of this ordinance are intended to become and to be made part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re-lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to secUon, "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION THREE: Conflict and severance. ~ In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive provisions are intended to apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion is deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding will not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION FOUR: Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ,2002 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk · Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: James N. Colletta, Chairman ovcd as to form and legal sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney 4 iSF ' September 23, 2002 Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance regarding Public Swimming Pools Dear Georgia: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Friday September 27, 2002 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Carleen A. Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: Account: 001-155810-649110 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. THE BOARD WILL CONSIDER: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAW AND ORDINANCES CHAPTER 66, HEALTH AND SANITATION, ARTICLE V, PUBLIC SWIMMING POOLS, ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE 77-51, AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 99-65; AMENDING SECTION 66-119, PERTAINING TO SWIMMING POOL WATER QUALITY AND SAFETY; AMENDING SECTION 66-121, PERTAINING TO VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION INTO THE COUNTY'S CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. Ail material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISISONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Carleen A. Edwards To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com Amend Chapter 66 - Public Swimming Pools '8F 09/24/02 Good Morning, Attached is legal advertising for Fri. 09/27/02. Thank you. Have a nice Day. Amend Chapter Amend Chapter 66.doc 66.doc Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:19 AM Carleen A. Edwards Delivered: Amend Chapter 66 ~ Public Swimming Pools Amend Chapter 66 - Public Swim,.. <<Amend Chapter 66 Public Swimming Pools>> Your message To: legals@naplesnews.com Subject: Amend Chapter 66 Public Swimming Pools Sent: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:21:46 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): legals on Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:19:21 -0400 NapLes Daily News NapLes, FL 34102 Affidavit of PubLication · NapLes DaiLy News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHERI LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 0011558106491 58526289 NOTZCE OF PUBLIC HEA State of FLorida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, FLorida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida, for a period of I year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pubLiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 09/27 AD SPACE: 108.000 INCH FILED ON: 09/27/02 ....... ........ ..................... Sworn to and Subscribed ~c~e re t~e~l O~.ay of~, 20~~,~ PersonaLLy known by" ~ ~~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice Is herelw give that the Board of Ceur~ Commissioners of CoIIh Cantv will hokl o publ hooting On T__u~, 0 teber I, 200_~,_ IX t~ Boardroom. aid FIDe Admlnlstroflon Buildln Florida. The rtt~Mlng w be~Hn at 9~0 AJ~L I E BOARD WILLI CONSIDER: AN ORDI-I NANCE AMENDINGI CQLLIER COUNTYI CODE OF LAW AND I ORDINANCES CHAP-I TER 66, HEALTH AND~ SANITATION, ARTI-~ CLE V, PUBLK: SWIM- MING POOLS, ESTAB- LISHED BY aY ORm- NANCE 99-65; AMENDING SECTION 66'119, PERTAINING TO SWIMMING POOL WATER GUALITY AND SAFETY; AMENDING SECTION TO VlOLATION~ PRD- VIDING FOR INCLU- SION INTO THE COUN- TY'S CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CON- FLICT AND SE'VERA- BILITY; AND PROVID- ING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOTE: All Persons wlshlng to sleek On o.nY ogonda Item must regis- Iter with tile CeuntvAd- mlnlstrator prior to pre- Item to be addressed, n- dlvldual speakers will be limited to $ minutes on any Item. The selectl.on of on IndNklual to s~_K on beholf of on orgonlzoflon or group Is enco~aged. If recognized by ~e Choir, o Persons wishing to have wrlften or oraehlc Board agenda pa~_e~. must submit sam material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing, In ctpy caw, wrlthm niatorlals m- by_ the Boord stroll be sub- County st~f o minimum of seven doys prior to the pertaining thereta ana ensure ~ a vertmflm dud~ ttte te~lmmy and ~:JAI~D OF C~JNTY COAW~I~SONERS COLLIER C:OUN'IW,, FLORDA I JA~S N. COLETTA, CHAI~JV6~N I DWlOHT E; BROCK, I O.IEEK I BY:/s/Carleon Edword~, I '8F Collier County, Florida !1/28/84-S50 REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS 8 G To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: /XXXX/ Normal Legal Advertisement / / Other: {Display Adv., location, etc.) // ,,[[ Originating Dept/Div: Com. Dev. Serv./Impact Fee Admin. Person: . Date: Petition No. (If none, give brief descripUion): Pe?itionor: (Name & address): N~une & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (if mo~e space needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before: / X / BCC / / BZA / / Other Recfaesued hearing date: October 8, 2002 Based on advertisement appearing 10 days before hearing. Newspaper{s) to be used: {Complete only if important / /, /XXXi~7-- Naples Daily News or legally required ~--/) f------/ Other Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location a size): A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SCHEDULE ONE OF APPENDIX A OF CHAPTER 74 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAW AND ORDINANCES, AS AMENDED, THE SAME BEING THE COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE, IN TWO PIIASES; PROVIDING FOR PHASE ONE OF THE RATE INCREASE, RAISING ROAD IMPACT FEE RATES FOR ALL LAND USE CATEGORIES LISTED IN THE CURRENT ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE, WHICII ttAS BEEN IN EFFECT SINCE APRIL 1, 2000, BY AN AVERAGE OF NINETY PERCENT, WITH THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING SAID RATES INCLUDING A CREDIT FACTOR FOR THE COSTS ASOCIATED WITH RELOCATING WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE AS NECESSITATED BY TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS; PROVIDING FOR SAID RATES TO REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL SUCIt TIME THAT UPDATED COLLIER COUNTY WATER AND SEWER USER FEES AND WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES ARE ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND SUBSEQUENTLY BECOME EFFECTIVE, AT WHICH TIME PHASE TWO OF THE RATE INCREASE SHALL TAKE EFFECT, TIlE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING SAID RATES NO LONGER INCLUDING A CREDIT FACTOR FOR TIlE COSTS ASOCIATED WITtt RELOCATING WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE, FURTHER RAIS1NG ROAD IMPACT RATES FOR ALL LAND USE CATEGORES TO AN AVERAGE OF ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN PERCENT ABOVE THE RATES IN THE CURRENT ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE; PROVIDING FOR A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 2002. Companion petition(s), if any, & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee Include Advertisin~Cost? Yes /~ No / ~ If yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 113 1389~/~9110 Division Heag" Dat~/~m~.m~C&~n[9 Manager ~j~ Date List AltacP~enL~: (1) / ' (2) (3) // A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. NOTE: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's Office will distribute copies: /--I County Manager agenda file; /~ Requesting Division; /-----7 Original to Clerk's Office B. O~her hearings: Initiating Division Head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY l~ate Received ~/~ Date Advertised RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SCHEDULE ONE OF APPENDIX A OF CHAPTER 74 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAW AND ORDINANCES, AS AMENDED, THE SAME BEING THE COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE, IN TWO PHASES; PROVIDING FOR PHASE ONE OF THE RATE INCREASE, RAISING ROAD IMPACT FEE RATES FOR ALL LAND USE CATEGORIES LISTED IN THE CURRENT ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE, WHICH HAS BEEN IN EFFECT SINCE APRIL 1, 2000, BY AN AVERAGE OF NINETY PERCENT, WITH THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING SAID RATES INCLUDING A CREDIT FACTOR FOR THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RELOCATING WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE AS NECESSITATED BY TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS; PROVIDING FOR SAID RATES TO REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT UPDATED COLLIER COUNTY WATER AND SEWER USER FEES AND WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES ARE ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND SUBSEQUENTLY BECOME EFFECTIVE, AT WHICH TIME PHASE TWO OF THE RATE INCREASE SHALL TAKE EFFECT, THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING SAID RATES NO LONGER INCLUDING A CREDIT FACTOR FOR THE COSTS ASOCIATED WITH RELOCATING WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE, FURTHER RAISING ROAD IMPACT RATES FOR ALL LAND USE CATEGORES TO AN AVERAGE OF ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN PERCENT ABOVE THE RATES IN THE CURRENT ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE; PROVIDING FOR A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 2002. WHEREAS, on April 16, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County (the Board) adopted Ordinance No. 92-22, the Collier County Road Impact Fee Ordinance, thereby establishing the County's then applicable road impact fee rates; and WHEREAS, on January 11, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 2000-3, thereby establishing updated road impact fee rates using the same calculation formulas as those used for the rate schedule established by Ordinance No. 92-22, but employing updated variables; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 2001-13, the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, repealing and superceding all of the County's then existing impact fee regulations, and consolidating all of the County's impact fee regulations into that Ordinance, codified as Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Law and Ordinances (the Code), and incorporating the aforementioned road fee rates established by the adoption of Ordinance No. 2000-3; and 8G '"? WHEREAS, Section 74-502 of the Code states that impact fee studies should be reviewed at least every three (3) years; thus the County has retained expert consultants to evaluate and update unit costs and recommend changes to the fees where appropriate; and WHEREAS, Section 74-201 of the Code states that impact fee rates may be changed from time-to-time by resolutions of the Board, provided the Board holds a public hearing with regard to the impact fee rate schedule amendments; and WHEREAS, Collier County uses impact fees to supplement the funding of necessary capital improvements required to provide public facilities to serve new population and related development; and WHEREAS, the County's exceptional growth in the past two (2) years, in conjunction with sharply increasing road construction costs, warrants that the Board should undertake proactive measures to match road construction funding with documented future needs; and WHEREAS, the County's Consultant recommends road impact fee rate increases, an average increase of one hundred and eleven percent (111%), for all land use categories listed in the current road impact fee rate schedule, Schedule One Phase Il of Appendix A [as amended and attached hereto] of Ordinance No. 2001-13, as amended, the same being Schedule One of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Law and Ordinances; and WHEREAS, staff has recommended a phased implementation of the proposed road impact fee rates whereby the cost of relocation of water and sewer infrastructure necessitated by growth-related transportation capital improvements shall be initially excluded from the rate calculation formula until such time that updated Collier County water and sewer user fee rates and water and sewer impact fee rates have been adopted by the Board of County Commissioners, thereby removing the cost of relocating underground water and sewer infrastructure necessitated by growth-related transportation capital improvements from the Collier County water and sewer user fee rates and water and sewer impact fee rates; and 2 WHEREAS, said phased implementation of the proposed road impact fee rates shall, on the effective date of this Resolution, initially result in an average increase of ninety percent (90%) for all land use categories listed in the current road impact fee rate schedule, as shown in Appendix A, Schedule One, Phase I, attached hereto; and said Phase I road impact fee schedule shall remain in effect until such time that updated Collier County water and sewer user fee rates and water and sewer impact fee rates have been adopted by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners and subsequently the rates in Phase II take effect; and WHEREAS, staff has thoroughly reviewed the Consultant's findings and recommendations and concurs with the recommended road impact fee rate increases as specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby declares that the road impact fee rates set forth in the revised Schedule One of Appendix A, Phase I of Ordinance No. 2001-13, as amended, the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, are fair and reasonable, and shall be assessed as authorized by Collier County Ordinance No. 2001-13, as now or hereafter amended. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforesaid Phase I road impact fee schedule, reflecting an average rate increase of ninety percent (90%) above the current road impact fee rates that became effective on April 1, 2000, shall take effect on November 1, 2002 and shall remain in effect until such time that the current Collier County water and sewer user fee rates have been updated and amended by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, at which time the fully implemented road impact fee schedule, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein as Schedule One of Appendix A, Phase II, reflecting an average rate increase of one hundred and eleven percent (111%) above the current road impact fee rates that became effective on April 1, 2000, being hereby declared by the Board of County Commissioners as fair and reasonable, shall take effect, and 3 shall from that time thenceforth be assessed as authorized Ordinance No. 2001 - 13, as then and thereafter amended. This Resolution is adopted after motion, second favoring adoption this __ day of October, 2002. by Collier County and majority vote ATTEST Dwight E. Brock, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By By: Deputy Clerk James N. Coletta, Chairman Approved as to form and legal?~fficiency: (~a~cq441ine Hubbard Rob'i-ns6n, L3ssigthnt County Attorney 4 8(] September 23, 2002 Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution Amending Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances Dear Georgia: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Friday September 27, 2002 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Carleen A. Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: Account 113-138913-649110 8C NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SCHEDULE ONE OF APPENDIX A OF CHAPTER 74 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAW AND ORDINANCES, AS AMENDED, THE SAME BEING THE COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE, IN TWO PHASES; PROVIDING FOR PHASE ONE OF THE RATE INCREASE, RAISING ROAD IMPACT FEE RATES FOR ALL LAND USE CATEGORIES LISTED IN THE CURRENT ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE, WHICH HAS BEEN IN EFFECT SINCE APRIL 1, 2000, BY AN AVERAGE OF NINETY PERCENT, WITH THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING SAID RATES INCLUDING A CREDIT FACTOR FOR THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RELOCATING WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE AS NECESSITATED BY TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS; PROVIDING FOR SAID RATES TO REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT UPDATED COLLIER COUNTY WATER AND SEWER USER FEES AND WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES ARE ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND SUBSEQUENTLY BECOME EFFECTIVE, AT WHICH TIME PHASE TWO OF THE RATE INCREASE SHALL TAKE EFFECT, THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING SAID RATES NO LONGER INCLUDING A CREDIT FACTOR FOR THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RELOCATING WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE, FURTHER RAISING ROAD IMPACT RATES FOR ALL LAND USE CATEGORIES TO AN AVERAGE OF ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN PERCENT ABOVE THE RATES IN THE CURRENT ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE; PROVIDING FOR A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 2002. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. Ail material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) APPENDIX A SCHEDULE ONE- PHASE I ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE Residential Rate Single Family Detached House Less than 1,500 Sq. Ft. 1,500 to 2,499 Sq. Ft. 2,500 Sq. Ft. or larger Multi-Family (1-2 Stories) Multi-Family (3-9 Stories) Multi-Family (Above 10 Stories Assisted Living Facility (ALF) Condominium/Townhouse Mobile Home Retirement Home/Adult Congregate Living Facility (ACLF) High-Rise Condominium $ ! ,825.9953,472.00/Dwelling Unit ~,-,¢'~ '~..,~ ~. 9954,629.00/Dwelling Unit $2,87! .9955,462.00/Dwelling Unit $ !,899.9053,429.00/Dwelling Unit $ 1,811.9953,449.00/ Dwelling Unit ~,.,.¢ ~ ~ ~7.9952,185.00/Dwelling Unit $262.90 $503.00/Dwelling Unit ,~.,..~ ' ~ ~ 2 .9952 ,882 .00/Dwelling Unit ~,.,¢' 953 .0952 ,009 .00/Dwelling Unit · , ...... $1,933.00/Dwelling Unit ,979.9952,056.00/Dwelling Unit LodEinE Hotel Motel Resort Hotel RV Park ~,., ...... ,-,,-,.,,-.,~u Per Room $892.99 $1,703.00 Per Room $1,559.9052,949.00 Per Room $1,965.9952,029.00/Dwelling Unit Recreation Golf Course Movie Theaters Marina $156,33 ~..005298,043.00/18 Holes $!9,571.99520,318.00 Per Screen $862.90 $1,641.00/Boat Berth Institutional Hospital Nursing Home Church Elementary School Middle School High School Jr./Community College University Day Care $3,763.0057,164.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $2~.9.99 $653.00 Per Bed $2,199.9054,172.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $2 !3.905406.00 Per Student $322.095613.00 Per Student $d2!.995801.00 Per Student $382.005728.00 Per Student $599.0051,125.00 Per Student $225.005439.00 Per Student Carleen A. Edwards To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com Amend Chapter 74, Code of Law & Ordinances 86 O9/23/O2 Hi Georgia, Attached is advertising for Fri. 9/27/02. Thank you & Have a Nice Day. Amend Chapter 74. Amend Chapter 74. (2).doc (2).doc Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@clerk.collier.fi.us Monday, September 23, 2002 1:07 PM Carleen A. Edwards Delivery Status Notification (Relay) A'l-1-348369.txt Amend Chapter 74, Code of Law ... This is an Your message has been successfully delivery status notifications may automatically 9enerated Delivery Status Notification. relayed to the following recipients, but the requested not be 9enerated by the destination. legals@naplesnews.com Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Monday, September 23, 2002 1:05 PM Carleen A. Edwards Delivered: Amend Chapter 74, Code of Law & Ordinances 4..i Amend Chapter 74, Code of Law ... <<Amend Chapter 74, Code of Law & Ordinances>> Your message To: legals@naplesnews.com Subject: Amend Chapter 74, Code of Law & Ordinances Sent: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:06:59 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): legals on Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:04:37 -0400 ' 8G Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Dail~ News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHERI LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 1131389136491 585262.52 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published a: Naples, in Collier County, FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said HapLes Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, FLorida/ each day and has been entered as second class n~il ~tter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida/ for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 09/27 NO31CE O~ I PUBLIC HEARING Notice Is hereby glvenJ wing or rue~ay, Oc-/ Adtnlnls'lr~ on Bulldlno, Tamlaml rail, . Florida. 31 . meeltng wm, ARES LUTION OF THE OARD OF COUNT ' COMMIS- SI,NE S OF COLLIER C,UN Y. FLORIDA, AME~ )lNG SCHED- ULE ~ ~E OF APPEN. DIX A, )F CHAPTER 74 OF Tk4E COLLIER COUNTY CODE ,FI LAW AND ORDI-I N_A.NC_E5~ AS A/~ND-1 ED, THE SAME BEING L THE COLLBE COUN-i TY CONSOLIDATED iMPACT FEE ORDI- NANCE, IN TWO PHASES:' PROVIDING FOR PHASE ONE OF THE RATE INCREASE, I~AI~ING- ROAD IM- PACT FEE RATES; FOR ALL LAND USE I CATEGORIES LISTED I N THE CURRENT/ i ROAD IMPACT FEEl SCHEDULE, WHICH/ HAS BEEN IN EFFE.C:r_ SINCE APRIL 1, 2000, BY AN A~v~.RAGE OF NINETY PERCENT, WITH THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING AD SPACE: 164.000 INCH ON: 09/27/02 ....... ,________-------------------'''" S,orn to and Subscribed ~,me ~a~__~~: .... Personally known by me . SAID RATES INCLUD- ING A CREDIT FAC- TOR FOR THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RELOCATING WATER AND SEWER UTILI- TIES INFRASTRUC-I TURE AS NECESSI-I TATED BYI TRANSPORTATIONI CAPITAL IMPROVE-/ MENT PROJECTS;/ PROVIDING FOR SAID I RATES TO REMAIN EFFECT UNTIL SUCH~ TIME THAT UPDAT-/ ED COLLIER COUNTY| WATER AND SEWER| USER FEES ANDI WATER AND SEWER I IMPACT FEES ARE I ADOPTED BY THEI BOARD OF COUNTY| COMMISSIONERS A~NED. J SUBSEQUENTLY B -J COME EFFECTIVE,/ AT WHICH TIME: PHASE TWO OF THE RATE INCREASE TAKE EF- SHALL :ORMULA ATING NO 'OR AS- SOCIATED WITH RE- LOCATING WATER AND SEWEt UTILI- TIES INFR kSTRUC- TURE. F RTHER RAISING R ~AD PACT R~ ;S FOR ALL LANe ~E CATE- GORIES Ti ~N AVER- AGE OF ~IE HUN'/ DEED A~ ~EN PERCEN AB'YE| THE RA~T IN THE/ CURRENT ,AD PACT FI 5CHED-| ULE; PRO )lNG FOR/ A DELA~ ) EFFEC-| 11VE DA OF NO-/ : All Personsl Ifem must or prior fo pre-/ he oddresse~l. In-~ spe~k_ ers..will be ~o 5 minutes on The selectig, n of Idu=l to spe~K on of an organization on an Ifem. Persons wishing to hove wrlften or .g.rap.h. Ic ,.~,~-IaJ~ Inclu~eQ In met RESOLUTION NO. 2002- ~l 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SCHEDULE ONE OF APPENDIX A OF CHAPTER 74 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAW AND ORDINANCES, AS AMENDED, THE SAME BEING THE COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE, IN TWO PHASES; PROVIDING FOR PHASE ONE OF THE RATE INCREASE, RAISING ROAD IMPACT FEE RATES FOR ALL LAND USE CATEGORIES LIS~TED IN THE CURRENT ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE, WHICH HAS BEEN IN' 'EFFECT SINCE APRIL 1, 2000, BY AN AVERAGE OF NINETY PERCENT, WITH THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING SAID RATES INCLUDING A CREDIT FACTOR FOR THE COSTS ASOCIATED WITH RELOCATING WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE AS NECESSITATED BY TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS; PROVIDING FOR SAID RATES TO REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT UPDATED COLLIER COUNTY WATER AND SEWER USER FEES AND WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES ARE ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND SUBSEQUENTLY BECOME EFFECTIVE, AT WHICH TIME PHASE TWO OF THE RATE INCREASE SHALL TAKE EFFECT, THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING SAID RATES NO LONGER INCLUDING A CREDIT FACTOR FOR THE COSTS ASOCIATED WITH RELOCATING WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE, FURTHER RAISING ROAD IMPACT RATES FOR ALL LAND USE CATEGORES TO AN AVERAGE OF ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN PERCENT ABOVE THE RATES IN THE CURRENT ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE; PROVIDING AUTHORIZATION FOR ALL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED PRIOR TO JULY 30, 2002 TO BE ABLE TO HAVE A SIMULTANEOUS REVIEW OF SITE DEVEVELOPMENT PLANS AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS UNTIL NOVEMBER 1, 2002, THEREBY AUTHORIZING THE ASSESSMENT OF APPLCIABLE ROAD IMPACT FEES AT THE RATES IN EFFECT PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NEW ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE, WHICH IS SET FORTH HEREIN; AND PROVIDING FOR A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 2002. WHEREAS, on April 16, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County (the Board) adopted Ordinance No. 92-22, the Collier County Road Impact Fee Ordinance, thereby establishing the County's then applicable road impact fee rates; and WHEREAS, on January 11, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 2000-3, thereby establishing updated road impact fee rates using the same calculation formulas as those used for the rate schedule established by Ordinance No. 92-22, but employing updated variables; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 2001-13, the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, repealing and superceding all of the County's then existing impact fee regulations, and consolidating all of the County's impact fee regulations into that Ordinance, codified as Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Law and Ordinances (the Code), and incorporating the aforementioned road fee rates established by the adoption of Ordinance No. 2000-3; and WHEREAS, Section 74-502 of the Code states that impact fee studies should be reviewed at least every three (3) years; thus the County has retained expert consultants to evaluate and update unit costs and recommend changes to the fees where appropriate; and WHEREAS, Section 74-201 of the Code states that impact fee rates may be changed from time-to-time by resolutions of the Board, provided the Board holds a public hearing with regard to the impact fee rate schedule amendments; and WHEREAS, Collier County uses impact fees to supplement the funding of necessary capital improvements required to provide public facilities to serve new population and related development; and WHEREAS, the County's exceptional growth in the past two (2) years, in conjunction with sharply increasing road construction costs, warrants that the Board should undertake proactive measures to match road construction funding with documented future needs; and WHEREAS, the County's Consultant recommends road impact fee rate increases, an average increase of one hundred and eleven percent (111%), for all land use categories listed in the current road impact fee rate schedule, Schedule One of Appendix A [as amended and attached hereto] of Ordinance No. 2001-13, as amended, the same being Schedule One of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Law and Ordinances; and WHEREAS, staff has recommended a phased implementation of the proposed road impact fee rates whereby the cost of relocation of water and sewer infrastructure necessitated by growth-related transportation capital improvements shall be initially excluded from the rate calculation formula until such time that updated Collier County water and sewer user fee rates and water and sewer impact fee rates have been adopted by the Board of County Commissioners, thereby removing the cost of relocating underground water and sewer infrastructure necessitated by growth-related transportation capital improvements from the Collier County water and sewer user fee rates and water and sewer impact fee rates; and WHEREAS, said phased implementation of the proposed road impact fee rates shall, on the effective date of this Resolution, initially result in an average increase of ninety percent (90%) for all land use categories listed in the current road impact fee rate schedule, as shown in Appendix A, Schedule One, Phase I, attached hereto; and said Phase I road impact fee schedule shall remain in effect until such time that updated Collier County water and sewer user fee rates and water and sewer impact fee rates have been adopted by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners and subsequently take effect; and WHEREAS, staff has thoroughly reviewed the Consultant's findings and recommendations and concurs with the recommended road impact fee rate increases as specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby declares that the road impact fee rates set forth in the revised Schedule One of Appendix A, Phase I of Ordinance No. 2001-13, as amended, the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, are fair and reasonable, and shall be assessed as authorized by Collier County Ordinance No. 2001-13, as now or hereafter amended. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforesaid Phase I road impact fee schedule, reflecting an average rate increase of ninety percent (90%) above the current road impact fee rates 8G that became effective on April 1, 2000, shall take effect on November 1, 2002 and shall remain in effect until such time that the current Collier County water and sewer user fee rates have been updated and amended by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, at which time the fully implemented road impact fee schedule, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein as Schedule One of Appendix A, Phase II, reflecting an average rate increase of one hundred and eleven percent (111%) above the current road impact fee rates that became effective on April 1, 2000, being hereby declared by the Board of County Commissioners as fair and reasonable, shall take effect, and shall from that time thenceforth be assessed as authorized by Collier County Ordinance No. 2001-13, as then and thereafter amended; and that for any development for which a complete and sufficient Site Development Plan (SDP) application package was submitted to the County for review prior to July 31, 2002, the developer or designated builder for the development may submit a complete and sufficient building permit application through October 31, 2002 without first obtaining (SDP) approval from the County, and the County shall subsequently calculate and assess Road Impact Fees for said development at the rate or rates for the applicable land use category or categories in effect on the date the building permit application is submitted pursuant to Schedule One of Appendix A of Collier County Ordinance No. 2001-13, which took effect on April 1, 2000 and remains in effect until superceded by this Resolution on the effective date of November 1, 2002. This Resolution is adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring adoption this ~day of October, 2002. · ,,~-\ j~ .... . ~.;~ £~, .5: -,D~ght E.-Or0c$~{ Clerk "2 ~BY:~6~uty Clefk ~ t Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: [~cq[el(ne-~ubba{d ~binson, ssistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Jam~ APPENDIX A SCHEDULE ONE - PHASE I ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDUIJE Residential Rate Single Family Detached House Less than 1,500 Sq. Ft. 1,500 to 2,499 Sq. Ft. 2,500 Sq. Ft. or larger Multi-Family (1-2 Stories) Multi-Family (3-9 Stories) Multi-Family (Above 10 Stories Assisted Living Facility (ALF) Condominium/Townhouse Mobile Home Retirement Home/Adult Congregate Living Facility (ACLF) High-Rise Condominium Lodffinff ,S25.0053,472.00/Dwelling Unit 22,~. 33.O054,629.00/Dwelling Unit Q.7~ .0055,462.00/Dwelling Unit ,800.0053,429.00/ Dwelling Unit ~ .0053,449.00/Dwelling Unit 7.0052,185.00/Dwelling Unit .00 $503.00/Dwelling Unit 2.0052,882.00/Dwelling Unit ...... $2,009.00/Dwelling Unit ,0 ! 2.0051,933.00/Dwelling Unit 079 0052 056 00/Dwelling Unit Hotel Motel Resort Hotel RVPark Recreation $!,752.0053,352.00 Per Room ~oc~,~ nt~ $1 703 00 Per Room 2 !,550.0052,949.00 Per Room 2 !,055.0052,029.00/Dwelling Unit Golf Course Movie Theaters Marina $ ! 55,22 ~..005298,043.00/18 Holes $ ! 0,57 ! .00520,318.00 Per Screen $852.00 $1,641.00/ Boat Berth Institutional Hospital Nursing Home Church Elementary School Middle School High School Jr./Community College University Day Care 22,752.0057,164.00/1000 Sq. Ft. e-~Ata nr~ $653 00 Per Bed 22,!90.0054,172.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $212.005406.00 Per Student 2222.005613.00 Per Student $'~.21.005801.00 Per Student $282.005728.00 Per Student ....... $1,125.00 Per Student 2225.00.$439.00 Per Student Words s~.:'c~x *&zo'agh are deleted; words underlined are added. APPENDIX A SCHEDULE ONE - PHASE 1 ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE (CONTINUED) Office Office 50,000Sq Ft or less Office 50,001-100,000Sq Ft or less Office 100,001-200,000Sq Ft or less Office 200,001-400,000Sq Ft or less Office Greater than 400,000Sq Ft Medical Office Retail Specialty Retail Retail 50,000Sq Ft. or less Retail 50,001-100,000Sq Ft Retail 100,001-150,000Sq Ft Retail 150,001-200,000Sq Ft Retail 200,001-400,000Sq Ft Retail 400,001-600,000Sq Ft Retail 600,001-1,000,000Sq Ft Retail greater than 1,000,000Sq Ft Pharmacy/Drag Store w/Drive-Thru Home Improvement Superstore Restaurant: High Turnover Restaurant: Low Turnover Restaurant: Drive-in Gasoline/Service Station Supermarket Quick Lube Convenience Store Convenience Store w/Gas Pumps Convenience Store/Gas/Fast Food Services Auto Repair/Body Shop Tire Store New/Used Auto Sales Bank/Savings: Walk-in ~.~, ...... ~,.,., 17.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $2,251.9956,401.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $2,$5!.9955,450.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $2,a-25.9954,640.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $2,2 I$.9054,224.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $7,255.99513,854.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $5, I !9.90511,696.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $2,258.9956,517.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $2,828.9057,403.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $2,91 !.0957,528.00/1000 Sq. Ft. ?.,032.9957,747.00/1000 Sq. Ft. ?.,5!4.9958,642.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $a.,750.0959,079.00/1000 Sq. Ft. ca ogA nn~:o ql 1.00/1000 Sq. Ft. ~:< n¢~ .9059,637.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $3,589.9056,923.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $4,2?,.9058,299.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $!9,575.90520,365.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $9-,St0d~$17,877.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $21,!5!.90541,198.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $2,q 05.00$4,704.00Pert~mpFuel Position eA A1 $.0058,522.00/ 1000 Sq. Ft. $4,579.9058,760.00 Per Bay $I !,a, fi$.90522,914.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $5,913.99513,710.00PergumpFuel Posn. $!2,182.99513,597.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $4,a. 55.9058,531.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $3,258.9956,264.00 Per Bay $8,993.99515,413.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $5,535.99512,836.00/1000 Sq. Ft. Words :mazk tFccugh are deleted; words underlined are added. APPENDIX A SCHEDULE ONE - PHASE I ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE (CONTINUED) Bank/Savings: Drive-in Car Wash !,125.00521,518.00/1000 Sq. Ft. 0,0 ! 7.00519,234.00 Per Bay Industrial and Agricultural General Industrial Business Park (Flex-space) Mini-Warehouse ...... ~,-,, .... 1000 Sq. Ft. $~,2S5.0058,357.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $1,080.00/1000 Sq. Ft. Words s.~.ac~: t?zc'agh are deleted; words underlined are added. APPENDIX A SCHEDULE ONE - PHASE II ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE Residential Rate Single Family Detached House Less than 1,500 Sq. Ft. 1,500 to 2,499 Sq. Ft. 2,500 Sq. Ft. or larger Multi-Family (1-2 Stories) Multi-Family (3-9 Stories) Multi-Family (Above 10 Stories Assisted Living Facility (ALF) Condominium/Townhouse Mobile Home Retirement Home/Adult Congregate Living Facility (ACLF) High-Rise Condominium $2,472.0053,835.00/Dwelling Unit $4,429.0055,113.00/Dwelling Unit $5,n. 42.0056,034.00/Dwelling Unit $2,429.0053,789.00/Dwelling Unit $2, n. ~. 9.0053,812.00/Dwelling Unit ¢° 125.0052,415.00/Dwelling Unit $502.00 $556.00/Dwelling Unit $2,222.0053,185.00/Dwelling Unit $2,009.0052,222.00/Dwelling Unit $1,922.0052,139.00/Dwelling Unit $2,054.0952,272.00/Dwelling Unit Lodffinff Hotel Motel Resort Hotel RV Park $2,252.9053,703.00 Per Room ~, ...... ..,884.00 Per Room $2,?.9.0053,258.00 Per Room $2,029.0052,242.00/Dwelling Unit Recreation Golf Course Movie Theaters Marina $295,0~.3.005329,475.00/18 Holes eon ~ ~ 2.00522,524.00 Per Screen ¢ ~ ,;A ~ .0051,813.00/Boat Berth Institutional Hospital Nursing Home Church Elementary School Middle School High School Jr./Community College University Day Care $7,!4~.9057,916.00/1000 Sq. Ft. ¢~:~.005723.00 Per Bed ~, ...... ,~,,11.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $d95.005449.00 Per Student $6 ! 2.005678.00 Per Student $891.005886.00 Per Student $72S.995804.00 Per Student $ I, !25.9051,243.00 Per Student $429.905489.00 Per Student Words s.~..z'c~x tFzm:gh are deleted; words underlined are added. APPENDIX A SCHEDULE ONE - PHASE II ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE (CONTINUED) Office Office 50,000Sq Ft or less Office 50,001-100,000Sq Ft or less Office 100,001-200,000Sq Ft or less Office 200,001-400,000Sq Ft or less Office Greater than 400,000Sq Ft Medical Office $7,517.0058,307.00/1000 Sq. Ft. e~ Aa~ .0057,073.00/1000 Sq. Ft. ,~, ..... 0.$6,023.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $~.,6~0.00.$5,128.00/1000 Sq. Ft. ?.,22n..0054,668.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $~-~,oqn 00515,316.00/1000 Sq. Ft. Retail Specialty Retail Retail 50,000Sq Ft. or less Retail 50,001 ~ 100,000Sq Ft Retail 100,001-150,000Sq Ft Retail 150,001-200,000Sq Ft Retail 200,001-400,000Sq Ft Retail 400,001-600,000Sq Ft Retail 600,001-1,000,000Sq Ft Retail greater than 1,000,000Sq Ft Pharmacy/Drag Store w/Drive-Thru Home Improvement Superstore Restaurant: High Turnover Restaurant: Low Turnover Restaurant: Drive-in Gasoline/Service Station Supermarket Quick Lube Convenience Store Convenience Store w/Gas Pumps Convenience Store/Gas/Fast Food ~., ...... ,~2,948.00/1000 Sq. Ft. ~.v, ...... $7,249.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $7,~. 02.0058,217.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $7,528.00.$8,349.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $7,7a. 7.00.$8,587.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $8,6~.2.0059,568.00/1000 Sq. Ft. en twa ~q:~ 0,045.00/1000 Sq. Ft. ~$10,518.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $9;6-3--%00510,656.00/1000 Sq. Ft. ,v, ...... $7,683.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $8,299.0059,174.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $20,265.00.$22,590.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $!7,877.00519,811.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $4!,!9E.00545,868.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $~,70a-.0055,245.00PergumpFuel Position $8,522.0059,459.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $~,760.0059,701.00 Per Bay $22,9!~.00525,730.00/1000 Sq. Ft. el ~,-~ 0 00515,357 00PergampFuel Posn. $!2,597.00516,594.00/1000 Sq. Ft. Services Auto Repair/Body Shop Tire Store New/Used Auto Sales Bank/Savings: Walk-in $8,521.00~;9,444.00/1000 Sq. Ft. ~$6,938.00 Per Bay $15,n. 12.00517,033.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $!2,826.00514,259.00/1000 Sq. Ft. Words s,ack t~zcugh are deleted; words underlined are added. APPENDIX A SCHEDULE ONE - PHASE II ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE (CONTINUED) Bank/Savings: Drive-in Car Wash $21,518.90523.904.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $19,22n..99521,315.00 Per Bay Industrial and Agricultural General Industrial Business Park (Flex-space) Mini-Warehouse $4,222.0054,786/1000 Sq. Ft. $8,257.0059,237.00/1000 Sq. Ft. $!,080.0051,194.00/1000 Sq. Ft. Words s~ac~: t~cm:'g~ are deleted; words underlined are added. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-424 RESOLUTION REAPPOINTTNG DAVtD LEE ELLTS TO THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION. 9A WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 91-65 created the Affordable Housing Commission and provides that the County Commission shall appoint five (5) members to the Affordable Housing Commission and the City of Naples shall appoint four (4) members to the Affordable Housing Commission; and WHEREAS, there is currently a vacancy on this Commission; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties; and WHEREAS, the Affordable Housing Commission has provided to the Board of County Commissioners its recommendation for appointment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COIVlIVlTSSTONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that David Lee Ellis is hereby reappointed to the Affordable Housing Commission for a 3 year term, said term to expire on October 1, 2005. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: October 8, 2002 Al'TEST.: ;~W~ E. BROCK, Clerk ~.~i to Chairman's Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel County Attorney DCW/k:;h;public;kay;adv.bds. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA .lAME COLETTA, Chairman RESOLUTZON NO. 2002-425 RESOLUTZON APPOINTI'NG ESI~IERALDA "ESSIE" SERRATA TO THE WORKFORCE HOUSZNG ADVISORY COI~II~IITTEE. WHEREAS, on June 26, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Collier County Ordinance No. 2001-042 establishing the Workforce Housing Advisory Committee as an Ad Hoc Committee; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2001-42 provides that the Workforce Housing Advisory Committee shall be composed of ten (10) members; and WHEREAS, there is currently a vacancy on this committee; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties; and WHEREAS, the Workforce Housing Advisory Committee has provided the Board of County Commissioners with its recommendation for appointment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMIVlISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Esmeralda "Essie" Serrata is hereby appointed to the Workforce Housing Advisory Committee to fulfill the remainder of the vacant term, said term to expire on .lune 26, 2003. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DAEED: October 8, 2002 : :?: '~tGH~,E. ~[:~OCK, Clerk Attest as to $tltnature BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY:JAME~ Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weige[ "' County Attorney DCW/kn :h;public;kay;advisoryboards RESOLUTI'ON NO. 2002-426 ' RESOLUTTON REAPPOI~NTTNG THOMAS W. FRANCHTNO TO THE HISTORTC/ARCHAEOLOGZCAL PRESERVATTON BOARD WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 91-70 created the Historic/Archaeological Preservation Board and provides that the County Commission shall appoint seven (7) members to the Historical/Archaeological Preservation Board; and WHEREAS, there is currently a vacancy on this Board for the real estate category; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties; and WHEREAS, the Historical/Archaeological Preservation Board has submitted to the Board of County Commissioners its recommendation for appointment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD COIVlM][SSIONERS OF COLLI~ER COUNTY, FLORIDA, representing the category of real estate, is Historic/Archaeological Preservation Board for a 3 year term, said term to expire on October 1, 2005. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. OF COUNTY that Thomas W. Franchino, hereby reappointed to the ATED: October 8, 2002 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS -., .~!..]~ E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA :.: ~~ By: ,',..~,fl'~ ~s ~ ~atrmn $ signature onll, Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel ~" ~ County Attorney DCW/kn: h;public;kay;advisoryboards 9D RESOLUTi'ON NO. 2002-427 A RESOLUTI'ON APPOI'NTI'NG AND REAPPOtNTING I~IEI~IBERS TO THE LELY GOLF ESTATES BEAUTI'FI'CATI'ON ADVl'SORY COI~ll~I]:TTEE WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 87-69 created the Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee and provides that the Committee shall be composed of five (5) members; and WHEREAS, there are currently a vacancies on this Committee; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties; and WHEREAS, the Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee has provided the Board of County Commissioners with its recommendations for appointment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Ron Thorp is hereby appointed to the Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee for a 4 year term, said term to expire October 1, 2006. 2. Robert M. Slebodnik is hereby reappointed to the Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee for a 4 year term, said term to expire October 1, 2006. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and unanimous vote. DATED: October 8, 2002 A'[-EE$~: ~ ..i> 'bW:[GH~:-F'~ BROCK, Clerk AtteSt as to Chat~'s Approved as to form and legal su~ciency: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: //~ ' ',F-z.- ~.- ~.~/~' ]AME~I. COLE-I-FA, Chairman David C. Weigel County Attorney DCW/kn:h;public: kay;advisory boards '9E RESOLUTION NO. 02- 428 A RESOLUTION OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DIRECTING AND AUTHORIZING THAT NOTICE BE GIVEN IMMEDIATELY TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GULF BREEZE, FLORIDA; TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILTON, FLORIDA; TO THE FLORIDA WATER SERVICES AUTHORITY, TO ALLETE, INC., AND TO THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY HAS CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROPOSED SALE OF WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS OWNED BY FLORIDA WATER SERVICES, INC. TO THE FLORIDA WATER SERVICES AUTHORITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION 1. Expression of Concerns. A. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board") has recently become aware that the City of Gulf Breeze, Florida, ("Gulf Breeze") and the City of Milton, Florida ("Milton") within a very short period of time have agreed with Florida Water Services, Inc. ("FWS") and its parent corporation, Allete, Inc. ("Allete") - without any prior notice to, or consultation with, Collier County or the City of Marco Island, or to the best of our knowledge with any other affected local governments throughout Florida to create by interlocal agreement pursuant to Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, (the "lnterlocal Act") a legal entity called the "Florida Water Services Authority" ("FWSA") for the purpose of acquiring title to 152 water and/or wastewater utility systems owned by Allete throughout Florida. One of these systems is located in the City of Marco Island and one other system is located near the City of Marco Island, but in unincorporated Collier County. These two (2) utility systems are regulated by the Collier County Water-Wastewater Authority. B. Allete, Gulf Breeze and Milton have apparently agreed to a transaction (the "Transaction") which will, among other things, pay annually to Gulf Breeze two percent (2%) of the annual gross revenues of all of the subject 152 systems throughout Florida, and such annual payments will not in any event be less than 1.5 MILLION DOLLARS ($1,500,000) each year. The Board understands that these added costs will be passed on to the utility systems' customers. The Board has concerns whether these added costs will be prudent, just and reasonable. Furthermore, the Board is concerned that there are inherent conflicts of interest between Allete, Gulf Breeze and Milton and the FWSA, which are likely to benefit them to the detriment of all current FWS customers, including those in Collier County. First, the fact that the FWSA participants are compensated as a percentage of customer annual gross revenues means that Gulf Breeze and Milton will see financial advantage each time utility rates are ir~creased. Secondly, there is no advantage for Gulf Breeze to have pressed for a lower purchase price since it separately receives income based on the gross amount of bonds issued in connection with the purchase transaction. The higher the purchase price, the more bond transaction income that flows to Gulf Breeze. C. The Board has concerns that the creation of the FWSA and the proposed Transaction appear to have been conducted in undue haste. D. The Board has concerns whether it was possible for the City Council of the City of Gulf Breeze and the City Council of the City of Milton, in such a short period of time, to have conducted valid due diligence assessments of the physical condition of the 152 utility systems that are planned to be purchased by the FWSA, including, but not limited to, the need for clearly necessary and very expensive capital improvements to such systems in the foreseeable future. The Board has concerns whether the two cities could lawfully base any decision to purchase these 152 systems without having first rendered their own independent, objective analysis to determine the fair market value of each of the 152 systems. Furthermore, the Board has concerns that the total purchase price agreed to by FWSA of $507 million, which is $57 million in excess of the most recent offer considered to be reasonable by the Florida Governmental Utility Authority ("FGUA"), will necessarily increase the likelihood of short-term rate increases, the deferral of essential capital improvements, or both, merely so Allete may take from the sale substantially more "contributed property" already paid for by the utility's customers than would have been the case under the pending Florida Governmental Utility Authority's offer to purchase. E. The Board has concerns whether the creation of the FVVSA to implement the Transaction is in the public interest. FWSA's actions may be contrary to proper public purposes and may be unconscionable, illegal, or both. The Board has concerns whether the Transaction is authorized by law and the Florida Constitution. F. The Board has concerns that the Transaction, as structured, may render the subject 152 utility systems to be without any effective regulation if the Transaction takes place, including with regard to rates, capital improvements, and quality of service. The Board has concerns that if the Transaction takes place, whether these utility systems will be without effective, objective, regulation that might be controlled by, or unduly influenced by, the officers of these utility systems. The Board has concerns whether the City Council of the City of Gulf Breeze and the City Council of the City of Milton have sufficient time, sufficient ability or sufficient expertise to effectively regulate and operate these 152 utility systems. Pursuant to Chapter 367, Florida Statutes, many employees of the Florida Public Service Commission ("FPSC") have historically expended innumerable hours regulating such of these 152 utility systems that are under the FPSC's jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 367, Florida Statutes. The systems that are not regulated by the FPSC pursuant to Chapter 367, F.S., are regulated by five (5) Florida counties, including the Collier County Water-Wastewater Authority with regard to the two (2) systems located in Collier County. Apparently all such FPSC and Florida county regulation is to be transferred to the FWSA. While there is a line of political accountability for the actions of the FPSC running through the Governor and the Florida legislature and for county utility regulation through the elected County Commissioners, there will be no political accountability for the actions of the officials of City of Gulf Breeze and the City of Milton or the board members and management of the FWSA they appoint with regard to the customers of the 152 utility systems located in 27 other Florida counties. The Board has concerns that such a lack of accountability may be intolerable. G. It appears that with regard to the utility systems that are under the FPSC's Chapter 367, F. S., jurisdiction, the Transaction requires formal approval from the FPSC pursuant to Section 367.071, Florida Statutes. The Board is interested in how the FPSC will make its decisions with regard to the Transaction. SECTION 2. Direction to Deliver Resolution. The County Manager is hereby directed to immediately provide a certified copy of this Resolution to the City Manager of the City of Gulf Breeze, to the City Manager of the City of Milton, to the FWSA, to Allete, and to the Florida Public Service Commission. This Resolution is adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring adoption this ~ay of October 2002. ATTEST.. ,,,:~,,D~.!~6t~. ,groC'k Clerk · .. ,.-, andlegal ~ufficiency: Thomas G. ~almor, Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: dan(~ N. Cole~a, Chairman 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 10B RESOLUTION NO. 0 2- 4 2 9 RESOLUTION APPROVING USER FEES FOR COLLIER COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICES PURSUANT TO COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 96 - 36; ADOPTING BILLING AND COLLECTION PROCEDURE; PROVIDING ADJUSTMENTS AND WAIVERS; AND APPROVING HARDSHIP CASES AND PAYMENT PLANS WHEREAS, Collier County Emergency Medical Services (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "EMS") provides ambulance services to the residents and visitors of Collier County; and WHEREAS, the Collier County EMS operating budget is funded exclusively through ad valorem taxes and user fees; and WHEREAS, Collier County staff analysis of the cost for ambulance services requires an adjustment to the user fees to properly identify current costs of services to the residents and visitors of Collier County; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance 96 - 36 provides that the user fees for ambulance services may be established by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "the Board"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: SECTION ONE: EMS USER FEES BASE RATES SERVICE LEVELS A. EMS - BLS NON-EMERGENCY B. EMS - BLS EMERGENCY C. EMS-ALS 1 NON-EMERGENCY D. EMS- ALS 1 EMERGENCY E. EMS-ALS 2 EMERGENCY F. EMS- SPECIALTY CARE G. EMS- HELICOPTER F. EMS- HELICOPTER LOGISTICAL CODES BASE CHARGE A0428 $ 300.00 A0429 $ 325.00 A0426 $ 350.00 A0427 $ 400.00 A0433 $ 550.00 A0434 $ 650.00 A0431 $ 3,407.00 A0431 $ 650.00 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 4? MILEAGE RATES SERVICE LEVELS CODES MILEAGE CHARGE Do EMS- IN COUNTY GROUND UNIT (MINIMUM OF 1 MILE- CAP OF 10 MILES) EMS - OUT OF COUNTY GROUND UNIT (MINIMUM OF 1 MILE WITH NO CAP) EMS - IN COUNTY AIR UNIT (MINIMUM OF 1 MILE- CAP OF 10 MILES) EMS- OUT OF COUNTY AIR UNIT (MINIMUM OF 1 MILE WITH NO CAP) $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 49.00 $ 49.00 SPECIAL EVENTS AND MISCELANEOUS RATES SERVICE LEVELS RATES - TWO (2) MEDICS/ONE ALS VEHICLE (PER HOUR) - ONE (1) MEDIC/NO VEHICLE (PER HOUR) COPIES OF DOCUMENTS/PER PAGE (EXCLUDING GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES) INTEREST ON PAST DUE ACCOUNTS SECTION TWO: BILLING AND COLLECTION PROCEDURE The following shall be the minimum guidelines for procedures for ambulance service fees and charges: $ 150.00 $ 5o.oo $ 1.00 1% billing and collection A. Initial fees and charges for ambulance service(s) shall be assessed either prior to or following the service provision, as service dynamics reasonably permit. Unpaid fees and charges, subsequent to time of service, shall be reflected in an accounts receivable subsidiary ledger system to be maintained by the EMS Department. B. An initial bill for ambulance services shall be processed in the following manner within thirty (30) days after service is provided. 1. The County will send an initial bill to the service recipient's or responsible party's insurance carrier provided that appropriate insurance information is made available to the EMS Billing Section. The EMS Billing Section will accept Medicare assignment, as a participating provider, and will wait no less than 45 days for payment if Medicare or other insurance carrier's are billed. If the claim is denied, a bill will be sent to the service recipient or responsible party. 1..OB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 2. The County will also send a bill to Medicaid and accept assignment if appropriate insurance information is made available to the EMS Billing Section by the service recipient or responsible party. The EMS Billing Section will wait no less than 60 days for payment if Medicaid is billed. If the claim is denied because of no coverage at time of service, a bill will sent to the service recipient or responsible party. If Medicaid denies because they felt it was not medically necessary to be transported by ambulance, then the account will be adjusted off per the rules and regulations of Medicaid. 3. In the event the service recipient or responsible party does not have or does not provide proof of insurance coverage, the bill for ambulance service(s) shall be sent directly to the service recipient or responsible party for payment. The EMS Billing Section will wait no less than 30 days for payment. The following will occur if payment has not been received within above set guidelines: 1. A past due notice will be sent in accordance with the above provisions (45 days after billing third party or Medicare, 60 days after billing Medicaid and 30 days after billing responsible party or service recipient). 2. Thirty (30) days) after the first past due notice is sent, a second past due notice will be sent. 3. After a ten (10) day grace period, the account will be sent to the County's contracted collection agency. C. Interest will be assessed at 1% per month on all accounts that are sent to the County's contracted collection agency. (excluding hardships that adhere to County policy). D. A reasonable and customary payment plan will be made available for all service recipients or responsible parties. Should the service recipient or responsible party at any time fail to meet the terms and conditions of the payment plan, the unpaid balance shall be administered in accordance with Section B.3 above. E. When ambulance service bill(s), at any stage in this billing and collection procedure, are returned because the Postal Service cannot 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3O 31 32 33 34 35 36 10B effectuate delivery, the EMS Billing Section shall make a reasonable effort to ascertain the correct mailing address. If reasonable efforts to ascertain a correct address fail, the account(s) may be considered for other collection alternatives. F. Nothing contained in this section shall preclude reasonable telephone or other appropriate contact for billing and collection purposes, in accordance with all applicable laws. G. Throughout the fiscal year, the EMS Billing Section shall review all past due accounts and report to the Board of County Commissioners on an annual basis, of all past due accounts which are believed to be uncollectible. The Board shall, after reviewing these past due accounts and after finding that diligent efforts at collection have proven unsuccessful, remove these past due accounts from active accounts receivable in accordance with generally accepted accounting procedures and pursuant to law by Resolution. SECTION THREE: ADJUSTMENT OF EMS USER FEES The following shall be minimum guidelines for adjustments to ambulance service fees. The Board of County Commissioners in accordance with criteria established by the enabling Ordinance may authorize other adjustments. A. Medicare and Medicaid Adiustments Contractual adjustments under Medicare and/or Medicaid assignment will be made in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. Victim's Compensation Contractual Adjustments adjustments will be made in accordance with applicable rules and Contractual regulations. C. Contractual regulations. D. Worker's Compensation Contractual Adiustments adjustments will be made in accordance with applicable rules and County Employee Adiustments Board of County Commissioners and Constitutional Officers' employees that have Primary coverage under Collier County's insurance policy will receive an adjustment in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of Ordinance 96-36. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 3? 38 39 40 41 42 108 E. Champus/Tricare Adiustments Contractual adjustments will be made in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. F. Railroad Retirement Adiustments Contractual adjustments will be made in accordance with applicable rules and regulations, G. Social Services Adiustments Contractual adjustments will be made in accordance with rules established by the County Manager and memorialized by a memorandum of understanding executed by the Social Services Director and the EMS Operations Director. SECTION FOUR: WAIVER OF EMS USER FEE Pursuant to Ordinance No. 96 - 36, and from the effective date of this Resolution, user fees for EMS ambulance stand-by services for the following community special events shall be waived as the Board finds that a valid public purpose is hereby established in recognition of their charitable contributions to the Community: (1) Collier County Fair; (2) Everglades Seafood Festival; (3) Collier County Public High School varsity football games. Fees for other community special events may be waived in accordance with criteria established by the enabling Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: HARDSHIP CASES AND PAYMENT PLANS The Board recognizes that certain service recipients may need to be identified and processed as hardship cases. Payment plans will be established pursuant to the minimum guidelines set forth in this Resolution. A. Hardship cases will be established in accordance with the Federal Poverty guidelines, as used by the Social Services Department of Collier County. B. Payment plans for hardship cases will be set up on a monthly basis, with a minimum payment of $10.00 per month. Hardship cases, placed on a payment plan will not accrue interest or be placed into collection. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a service recipient has a payment plan and does not make the agreed scheduled payments for a period longer than two (2) months, the account will be turned over to the County's contracted collection agency and interest will begin to accrue. 5 lOB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14' 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 SECTION SiX: SUPERSESSION OF RESOLUTION 2001-410 This Resolution shall supersede Resolution No. 2001-410 SECTION SEVEN: ADOPTION AND EFFECTIVE DATE This Resolution shall become effective on October ,2002. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this z~'~ day of ~--~~ , 2002. Attest as to Chatriaa'$ signature only, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER C/O~TY, James~lq. Coletta, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ~c.q(L/eline Hubbard Robinson Assistant County Attorney RESOLUTION No. 2002 - 4 3 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING AND IMPLEMENTING BEACH PARKING FEES AND RULES PROPOSED BY THE COUNTY'S PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT THAT SPEC~Y THE DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED TO PROVE ELIGIBILITY TO BE ISSUED A STICKER TO INDICATE THAT A VEHICLE IS EXEMPT FROM PAYMENT OF BEACH PARKING FEES BASED UPON THE APPLICANT'S RESIDENCY IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 99-240. WHEREAS, by adoption of Resolution No. 99-240 on May 25, 1999, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, formally affirmed the County's policies regarding fees for parking vehicles at the County's beach parking facilities as specified in that Resolution; and WHEREAS, eligibility for exemption from payment of beach parking fees is based upon residency in Collier County because ad valorem taxes assessed against residential real property located in Collier County, plus other taxes that are paid by permanent residents partially pay for the County's expenses and the City of Naples' expenses related to the subject public beach facilities; such taxes are not paid by persons who are not permanent residents of Collier County or who do not own such real property. WHEREAS, beach parking fees for vehicles without a valid beach parking sticker will be established according to the Parks and Recreation Department's Facilities and Outdoor License and Fee Policy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. The above WHEREAS CLAUSES are incorporated herein by reference as if restated verbatim in this section. These Rules may be amended from time-to-time by Resolution(s) of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. The Board of County Commissioners makes the following findings of fact: 1. Most motor vehicles that are parked at the County's beach parking facilities are occupied by people who are not residents of Collier County. 2. Costs to provide beach parking facilities and to police, maintain and repair beaches, and to expand such parking facilities or construct new beach parking facilities increase with the increasing numbers of vehicles that are parked at those beach parking facilities. 3. This Resolution is to facilitate collection of those parking fees. SECTION TWO. APPLICABLE BEACH FACILITY LOCATIONS. Parking fees apply to the following beach parking facilities in Collier County. a. Barefoot Beach Access. b. Barefoot Beach Park. c. Vanderbilt Beach Access. d. Calm Pass Park. e. North Gulfshore Beach Access. f. Tigertail Beach. South Marco Beach Park. 2. Additional beach parking facilities may be added to this list from time-to-time by Resolution(s) adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION THREE. BEACH FACILITY PARKING FEES. The County's beach parking fees are: A. As set forth by the Parks and Recreation Department's Facilities and Outdoor Areas License and Fee Policy; and B. The fees are collected through parking meters or by direct collection by authorized county personnel at the respective beach parking facility. SECTION FOUR. VEHICLE EXEMPTION FROM BEACH FACILITY PARKING FEES FOR PERMANENT COLLIER COUNTY RESIDENTS; PROOF OF RESIDENCY IN COLLIER COUNTY. A. No vehicle shall be exempt from any beach facility parking fees unless the vehicle displays a valid beach parking sticker issued by Collier County or by the City of Naples. B. Rules adopted by the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department, entitled "Beach Facilities Parking Fees Exemptions - Documentation Required to Prove Residency in Collier County", and previously approved by the Board of County Commissioners by Resolution No. 99-240, are hereby reaffirmed. lOC C. The Rules are hereby affirmed by the Board of County Commissioners as the County's policies regarding the documentation that is required to be submitted to County's staff to prove that the applicant is eligible to be issued a sticker to be affixed to a vehicle to indicate that the vehicle is exempt from payment of beach parking fees at specified beach facilities in Collier County. SECTION FIVE. RESTRICTED PARKING AREAS. Pursuant to Section FOUR of Collier County Ordinance No. 80-47, as amended, each parking space at any the above-listed "Applicable Beach Facility Locations" is a geographic area where vehicle parking is prohibited except for vehicles that either display a valid vehicle parking sticker or the applicable beach parking fees have been paid to park that vehicle. SECTION SIX. PARKING PROHIBITED AT "EXPIRED" PARKING METERS. Pursuant to Section FOUR of Collier County Ordinance No. 80-47, as amended, at each of the above-listed "Applicable Beach Facility Locations" no parking space controlled by an individual parking meter shall be occupied by any vehicle when the parking meter reads "expired." Such parking is "prohibited" except when the respective metered parking fees have been paid into the parking meter applicable to the respective vehicle. SECTION SEVEN. PARKING CITATIONS. Pursuant to Chapter 89-449, Laws of Florida, as now or hereafter amended, and pursuant to Resolution(s) that may be adopted from time-to-time by the Board of County Commissioners in conjunction with Chapter 89-449, Collier County Park Rangers are authorized by that Special Act to issue parking citations at each beach facility in accordance with Ordinance No. 80-47, as now or hereafter amended, or as that Ordinance may be superseded in function by subsequent ordinance(s). SECTION EIGHT. REPEAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 99-240. Collier County Resolution No. 99-240, expressing the County's current policies regarding exemptions from these beach facilities parking fees, adopted on May 25, 1999, is hereby repealed in its entirety. lOC This Resolution adopted this ~ day of motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ,2002, after ~?~ ~WI'GH~.: BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUN~TY COI%~VIISSIONERS. ' 5 ' By:. By: .).'. -r .... .' .- _ -# ~,- 'Ddp~y-'Clerk Signal;ute only. J-AMiES N. CO ~ ~TTA, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney H:tcp/Res.99 - Beach Parking Fees -required documentation to prove eligibility for exemptions RESOLUTION INFORMATIVE NOTICES, RESOLUTION 2002 - AUTHORIZING COMMISSION 431 DISTRICT NEWSLETTERS, MAILERS OR OTHER INFORMATIONAL SITES OR TRANSMITTALS. WHEREAS, it is desirable for the people of Collier County government to be informed of county governmental issues, programs, proposals and plans including the thoughts and activities of the commissioners; and WHEREAS, newsletters, websites, emails and other informational notices prepared and transmitted by U.S. Mail, electronic or other means can serve the valid public purpose of informing county citizens of their local county government; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners considers the use of newsletters, emails, websites and other conventional message media as desirable to better fulfill the need to inform the citizens of their local government. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT NOW RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board finds the preparation and transmittal of commission district newsletters and informational notices to be a valid public purpose and in the public interest, and such newsletters or notices may be mailed, transmitted electronically, and/or be created as part of the County's website or otherwise communicated to the citizens of Collier County. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. DATED: OCT - 8 2002 Attest as to Chairman's signature onl$. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David c. Weigel, C~)t~nty At~lXne~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Jan~N. C-0~et~ a ,:~ h ~ rm-~a~"-"' OFFICE OF THE COUNTYATTORNEY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Maureen Kenyon, Supervisor Minutes and Records Rosa E. Martinez, Legal Secretary December 3, 2002 Homewood Residence-Notice of Publication/Foreclosure of Unpaid Impact Fee Liens/In Rem Action- Case No. Please find attached a copy of the correspondence that was sent to Dwight E. Brock on today's date. This notice needs to be advertised by this Sunday, December 8th. The account number to be charged is 113138913649100. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you. Cc~ David C. Weigel, County Attorney Ramiro Mafialich, Chief Assistant County Attorney Jacqueline Hubbard Robinson, Assistant County Attorney Denton Baker, Director Financial Administration & Housing Phil Tindall, Impact Fee Coordinator Maria Corzo, Administrative Assistant-Financial Administration & Housing H: Jackie/Homewood/ Litigation/ Memo transmitting notice of publication to minutes and records COLLIER COUNTY DAVID C. WEIGEL COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112-4902 Telephone: (239) 774-8400 FAX: (239) 774-022,5 December 3, 2002 (Via Facsimile and Hand Delivery) Dwight E. Brock, Clerk of Courts Collier County Courthouse 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Heidi E Ashton Jennifer A. Belpedio Ellen T. Chadwell Ramiro Mafialich William E. Mounfford Thomas C. Palmer Michael W. Pettit Jacqueline Hubbard Robinson Marjorie M. Student Patrick G. White Robert N. Zachary Re~ Itomewood Residence - Notice by Publication / Foreclosure of Unpaid Impact Fee Liens/In Rem Action- Case No. Dear Mr. Brock: On November 5, 2002 the Collier County Board of County Commissioners approved the filing of a Claim of Lien and the continuance of collection efforts against the above-referenced property. Pursuant to Section 74-501 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, unpaid impact fees are to be collected pursuant to the Procedure for Bringing Foreclosure Suit set forth in Florida Statutes, Section 173.04. For your convenience, I have attached a copy of the relevant statutory provisions. The nature of the action is in rem and this permits Collier County to proceed directly against the property. Jurisdiction of the lands in issue and of all parties interested therein or having a lien thereon is obtained by publication of a Notice in the Naples Daily News that is issued by your office at the request of the Complainant, which in this case is Collier County. The publication of the Notice, [a Notice is attached to this correspondence for your convenience], is to occur once each week for four [4] consecutive weeks, directed to all persons and corporations interested in or having any lien or claim upon the land described in the Notice. I am in the process of preparing a Complaint which will be filed with your office. If possible, this Notice needs to be published in an expedited fashion. Under the Notice, all parties are to be directed to appear and defend the suit on or before the day specified in the Notice, which shall be not less than 4 weeks after the date of the first publication. The appropriate dates in the Notice need to be filled in by your office after the dates of publication have been established. Dwight E. Brock, Clerk of Courts December 3, 2002 Page Two Proof of publication of the notice shall be by affidavit of the publisher. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you have any questions. Sin~cerely, inson UAssi~tant County Attorney Cc~ David C. Weigel, County Attorney Ramiro Mafialich, Chief Assistant County Attorney Board of County Commissioners (5) James V. Mudd, County Manager Joseph Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development Denton Baker, Director of Financial Administration & Housing Phil Tindall, Impact Fee Coordinator Amy Patterson, Impact Fee Analyst Paula Fleishman, Impact Fee Specialist Minutes & Records- Maureen Kenyon, Supervisor H: Jackied Homewood Ltr to Dwight Brock 112602 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA A Political Subdivision of the State of Florida Plaintiff V. CERTAIN LANDS UPON WHICH IMPACT FEES ARE DELINQUENT (A/K/A NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.- HOMEWOOD) Defendant NOTICE CASE NO. IN CHANCERY To all persons and corporations interested in or having any lien or claim upon any of the lands described herein: You are hereby notified that COLLIER COUNTY has filed its Bill of Complaint in the above named court to foreclose delinquent impact fees, with interest and penalties, upon the parcel of land set forth in the following schedule, the aggregate amount of such impact fees, interest and penalties, as set forth in said bill of complaint, being set opposite such parcels in the following schedule, to-wit: DESCRIPTION OF LANDS: Homewood Residence Address: 770 Goodlette Road North, Naples, Florida 34102 Legal Description: Lot 6 of Common Professional Park, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 23, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AMOUNT OF IMPACT FEES OWED: $118,695.00 plus a penalty/delinquent fee of 10% ($11,869.50), for a total of $130,564.50 plus accrued interest at the statutory rate of 9%. In addition to the amounts set opposite each parcel of land in the foregoing schedule, interest and penalties, as provided by law, on such delinquent taxes and special assessments, together with a proportionate part of thc costs and expenses of this suit, are sought to be enforced and foreclosed in this suit. You are hereby notified to appear and make your defenses to said bill of complaint on or before the l0th day of January, 2003, and if you fail to so on or before said date the bill will be taken as confessed by you and you will be barred from thereafter contesting said suit, and said court for nonpayment of said taxes and assessment liens and interest and penalties thereon and the costs of this suit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said court, this __ day of ,200__. DWIGHT E. BROCK BY: Deputy Clerk December 3, 2002 Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Publication/Foreclosure of Unpaid Impact Fee Liens Dear Georgia: Please advertise the above referenced publication once each week for four (4) consecutive weeks being Sunday, December 8, 2002 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Maureen Kenyon, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: Account 113-138913-649100 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1511 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA A Political Subdivision of the State of Florida Plaintiff V. CERTAIN LANDS UPON WHICH IMPACT FEES ARE DELINQUENT (A/K/A NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.- HOMEWOOD) Defendant NOTICE CASE NO. IN CHANCERY To all persons and corporations interested in or having any lien or claim upon any of the lands described herein: You are hereby notified that COLLIER COUNTY has filed its Bill of Complaint in the above named court to foreclose delinquent impact fees, with interest and penalties, upon the parcel of land set forth in the following schedule, the aggregate amount of such impact fees, interest and penalties, as set forth in said bill of complaint, being set opposite such parcels in the following schedule, to-wit: DESCRIPTION OF LANDS: Homewood Residence Address: 770 Goodlette Road North, Naples, Florida 34102 Legal Description: Lot 6 of Common Professional Park, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 23, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. AMOUNT OF IMPACT FEES OWED: $118,695.00 plus a penalty/delinquent fee of 10% ($11,869.50), for a total of $130,564.50 plus accrued interest at the statutory rate of 9%. In addition to the amounts set opposite each parcel of land in the foregoing schedule, interest and penalties, as provided by law, on such delinquent taxes and special assessments, together with a proportionate part of the costs and expenses of this suit, are sought to be enforced and foreclosed in this suit. You are hereby notified to appear and make your defenses to said bill of complaint on or before the l0th day of January, 2003, and if you fail to so on or before said date the bill will be taken as confessed by you and you will be barred from thereafter contesting said suit, and said court for nonpayment of said taxes and assessment liens and interest and penalties thereon and the costs of this suit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said court, this 3rd day of December, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS By:/s/Maureen Kenyon, Deputy Clerk (Seal) Maureen A. Kenyon To: Subject: legals@ naplesnews.com Home Residence Georgia: Please advertise the following for 4 consecutive Sundays beginning December 8, 2002. thanks. If you have any questions, please contact me at 774-8399. Homewood.do¢ Homewood.do¢ Maureen A. Ken~/on From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@clerk.collier.fl .us Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:48 PM Maureen A. Kenyon Delivery Status Notification (Relay) A'l-1'69303,t:xt Home Residence Notification. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals®naplesnews.com Maureen A. Kenyon From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:43 PM Maureen A. Kenyon Delivered: Home Residence HomeResidence <<Home Residence>> Your message To: legals@naplesnews.com Subject: Home Residence Sent: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 16:47:55 -0500 was delivered to the following recipient(s): legals on Tue, 3 Dec 2002 16:42:45 -0500 Home Residence Page 1 of 1 Maureen A. Kenyon From: legals [legals@naplesnews.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:54 PM To: Maureen A. Kenyon Subject: RE: Home Residence rcvd 4-sundays georgia ..... Original Message ..... From: Maureen A. Kenyon [mailto:Maureen. Kenyon@clerk.collier.fl.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:48 PM To: legals@naplesnews.com Subject: Home Residence Georgia: Please advertise the following for 4 consecutive Sundays beginning December 8, 2002. thanks. If you have any questions, please contact me at 774-8399. <<Homewood.doc>> <<Homewood.doc>> Haples Daily Ne~s Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COHHISSIONERS CHER! LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 1131389136~9 58577975 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT State of FLorida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared Angela Bryant, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person/ firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 12/08 12/15 12/22 12/29 AD SPACE: 123.000 INCH FILED ON: 12/31/02 S~orn toand Subscribed~ Personally knoun by me ~. RECEIVED 'JAN 0 2003 FINANCE DEPT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT 1 OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. IN CHANCERY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA A Political Subdivision of the Stoto of Florida Plofnflff v, CERTAIN LANDS UPON WHICH IMPACT FEES ARE DELINQUENT (A/K/A NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES; INC,- HOMEWOOD) Defendant NOTICE To a persons and cor- parations interested or having any lien orl claim uR any o.f theJ lands described herein: I You are hereby no-I rifled that COLLIERI COUNTY has filed Ifs[ Bill of Complaint In thai above named court roi foreclose delinquent Im- pact fees, with Interest and oena]fies~ upon the! Parcel of land set forth[ In the following sched-I ule, the aggregatel amount of such Impact/ fees, Interest and penal-J ties, as set form in sold/ bill of complaint, beln~ sat opposite such par cels 'In the followln~ schedule, fo.wl~. DESCRIPTION O.F LANDS: Homewood Residence Address: 770 Goadlefl Road Norm, Naples, Flor- Ida 34102 . Legal Description: Lot 6 of Common Pro- fesslonal Pork, accord- lng to the plat thereof re- corded In Plat Book 23, Page 23, of the Public Records of Collier Coun- tv, Flerlda. AMOUNT OF IMPACT FEES OWED: $118,695.00 plus a penal- tv/delinquent fee of 10%($11,869.50), for a total of $130~564.50 us accrued Interest at e sto~mr¥ rate of 9%. In addition to the amounts set of~oslte each parcel of land In the foregoing schedule, Interest and penofties, as provided by law, on such delinquent faxes merits, fogether with a proportionate part of the costs and expenses of this suit, are sought to be enforced and fore- closed In thls suit. You are hereby no. rifled to appear ant make your defenses tc said bill of complaint or before the 10th da' of January, 2003, and dof~ the bill ~11 be token os can° f~s.~d by you and you wlfl be Imrred ~rorn ther~fler corfl~stlng ~ld surf, and said court for nom~¥ment of said toxe< and assessmenl liens ond Interest and penalties thereon and costs of thls suit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have here- unto set mv hand and af fixed the official seal e said court, this 3rd da' of December, 2002; DWIGHT E. BROCK CLERK OF COURTS BY:. /s/Moureeh Ke~ yon, Daputv Clerk 2003 TOURISM AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND THE MARCO ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY, INC. FOR ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this tgffj/~lay of~~ , 2002, by and between the Marco Island Historical Society, Inc., a Florida not for profit corporation, hereinafter referred to as "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY". WHEREAS, the COUNTY has adopted a Tourist Development Plan (hereinafter referred to as "Plan") funded by proceeds from the Tourist Development Tax; and WHEREAS, the Plan provides that certain of the revenues generated by the Tourist Development Tax are to be allocated for the promotion and development of museums of Collier County and for the promotion and advertising of activities and certain special events intended to bring tourists to Collier County; and WHEREAS, the County may use Tourist Development Tax funds for museums of Collier County in general and the advertising, promotion and holding of special events in Collier County in particular during the months of May through November nationally and internationally; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY desires to fund the proposed acquisition and development of the Marco Island Historical Museum of Collier County pursuant to this Agreement with the advice of the Tourism Alliance of Collier County; and NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE MUTUAL COVENANTS AND PREMISES PROVIDED HEREIN, AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF WORK: "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" shall be the recipient of a grant in the amount of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars [$25,000.00] to be used as set forth in Exhibit "A" for: a. Architectural Design; b. Artist rendering/Floor Plan; c. Preparation of a Scale model of the proposed Marco Island Historical Museum of Collier County. The "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" shall provide matching funds in the amount of Five- Thousand Dollars [$5,000.00], said funds to be available at the time of the receipt of the initial funding of the Grant. 2. PAYMENT: The County Manager or his designee shall determine that the invoice payments are authorized and the goods or services covered by such invoice(s) have been provided or performed in accordance with such authorization. (a) The amount to be paid under this Agreement shall be Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000). The GRANTEE shall be paid in accordance with fiscal procedures of the County for expenditures incurred for the architectural expenses as described in Paragraph 1 upon submittal of an invoice and upon verification that the services described in the invoice have been completed or that goods have been received. (b) GRANTEE shall determine that the goods and services contracted for have been properly provided, and shall submit invoices to the County Administrator or his designee for review. (c) The County Administrator or his designee shall determine that the invoice payments are authorized and that the goods or services covered by such invoice[s] have been provided or performed in accordance with such authorization. The line item budget attached as Exhibit "A" shall constitute authorization for the expenditure[s] described in the invoice[s]. (d) All expenditure shall be made in conformity with this Agreement. (e) Each invoice submitted by GRANTEE shall be itemized in sufficient detail for audit thereof and shall be supported by copies of corresponding documentation such as vendor invoices and proof of receipt of the goods or performance of the services invoiced. (f) GRANTEE shall certify to the COUNTY in writing that all subcontractors and vendors have been paid for work and materials previously performed or received prior to receipt of any further payments. (g) The COUNTY shall not pay GRANTEE until the Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners pre-audits all payment invoices in accordance with law. 2 (h) Any expenditures paid by COUNTY which are later deemed to be ineligible expenditures shall be repaid to COUNTY within 30 days of COUNTY's written request to repay said funds. (i) COUNTY may request repayment of funds for a period of up to three years after termination of this Agreement or any extension or renewal thereof. 3. CHOICE OF VENDORS AND FAIR DEALING: "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" has recommended and the County has agreed to the selected architectural firm to provide services as described in paragraph one [ 1 ] herein. 4. COUNTY shall be responsible for paying said firm up to the amount of the grant. 5. NOTICES: All notices from the COUNTY to the "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" shall be in writing and deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail the following address: William Tyson, Director Marco Island Historical Society, Inc. 168 Royal Palm Drive Marco Island, Florida 34145 All notices from "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" to the COUNTY shall be in writing and deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the COUNTY to: Administrator Community Development & Environmental Services Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 The "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" and the COUNTY may change the above mailing addresses at any time upon giving the other party written notification pursuant to this section. 6. NO PARTNERSHIP: Nothing herein contained shall be construed as creating a parmership between the COUNTY and the "HISTORICAL SOCIETY", or any vendor or subcontractor of the "HISTORICAL SOCIETY", as an agent or employee of the COUNTY. 7. COOPERATION: "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" shall fully cooperate with the COUNTY in all matters pertaining to this agreement and provide all information and 3 documents as requested by the County from time to time. Failure to cooperate, as interpreted by the COUNTY, shall constitute grounds for the COUNTY to impose sanctions that may not result in termination of this agreement. 8. TERMINATION: The COUNTY or the "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" may cancel this Agreement with cause immediately or without cause by giving 30 days advance written notice of such termination and specifying the effective date of termination. 9. AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS: The "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" shall maintain all records, books, documents, papers and financial information pertaining to work performed under this Agreement. "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" agrees that the COUNTY, or any of its duly authorized representatives, shall, until the expiration of three [3] years after final payment under this Agreement, have access to, and the right to examine and photocopy any pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" involving transactions related to this Agreement. 10. PROHIBITION OF ASSIGNMENT: "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" shall not assign, convey, or transfer in whole or in part its interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. 11. TERM: This Agreement shall become effective on October 1, 2002 and shall terminate on September 30, 2003. 12. "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" shall request an extension of this Agreement in writing at least thirty [30] days prior to the expiration date an the COUNTY may agree by amendment to this Agreement to extend the term for an additional one year. Any funds not used by "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" during the term of this Agreement and any extension thereto shall be returned to the County and made available for future applicants. 13. The COUNTY shall be the owner of and in possession of the originals of all intellectual property created or furnished pursuant to this agreement, including, but not limited to drawings, paintings, photography, film, video, and printed documents, unless specifically exempted by the COUNTY. All materials provided by the selected architectural firm are exempt from this provision. 14. The COUNTY, pursuant to the policies and procedures of the COUNTY, approves and finds a public purpose, through approval of the attached Exhibit "A", in the 1 4 16A "HISTORICAL SOCIETY" directly contracting with the architectural firm named in Exhibit "A" for the expenditure of the Grant funds. 15. AMENDMENTS: This Agreement may only be amended by mutual agreement of the parties and after recommendation by the Tourist Development Council. 16. WRITTEN REPORTS: (a) GRANTEE shall provide to County written reports on the duties performed and services provided by GRANTEE, its vendors or subcontractors. (b) The reports shall identify the amounts spent, the duties performed, the services provided and the goods delivered during the preceding 30 days. 6. GRANTEE shall take reasonable measures to assure the continued satisfactory performance of all vendors and subcontractors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTEE and COUNTY have each respec, tjyf!y, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the ~first above written. ATTEST "~>'" D~iGHS~:h 'B~OcK, Clerk WlT~SS~natuve onll, Printed/Typed Name Pfinte~T~ed Name BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COLrjhlTY, FLORIDA By: _ ~ . =- -_~--; ,. Jii~A~ES N. CULkI'l'A,*Uhalrman G~TEE: M~CO ISLA~ HISTORICAL SOCIETY, ~C., COLLIER CO~TY Printed/Typed Name /o~l ~-~ / p ~---/,./ 7-' Printed/Typed Title Approved as to form and legal su~ffi_fi&ciency: J~tuelhfie Hubbard Robinson A~qistant County Attorney H: Jackie/Tourist Development Tax/2002 Tourism Agrmt-Marco Island Historical Society 9-26-O2; 11 : 1nAM;COLLIER CTY. DEV. 03/'..9/2002 15:14 F.~[ 6437435 .. B anvSc irtS, mmersWeaver ..... /-- '-'-~ -- O R A T E D A N D p A R T N E R S I N C O R P ;941 403 2395 Exhibit "A" 16'i 1 2/' 2 Marcfl 19, 2002 Josop~ A. B~an¥. AIA Eugene C. Schmitt, Daniel ^. Summers, Ronald G. Weevel. AIA Ke~.'~oth L. I.~ne~s. RA Kenneth G. Alitf, Foe Myers Otlico: [] Royal Palm Sq. Bird, Suite Fort Myers, FL 3;39t 9 341127~-3831~ FAX 941/275-5356 BSgWP. m@sot.com NapbJs Cffice:l-t 5t85 Cast~o Drive ~u~te 4 N apleo, FL 34103 941/643-3103 FAX 941/643-7435 BS~Wnap r~ aol.c~m License # AA C001863 Pedo{mance In Archflect~re and Mrs. Bill Tyson Director Marc~ lsla~td Historical Society P.O. Box 2282 Memo Island, [=L 34145 Dear Mr. 'l'~yson, 'i'hank you for the opportunity to provide preliminary design and planning services for the Marc/3 Island Museum. The following is a 13riel summary of the services needed to produce an effective marketing pacY, age for the Museum's fund caising campaign. Barany Sohmitt Summers Weaver & Partners, inc. proposes 1o: Meet with Museum and County ~epresentattves to develop a preliminary program for an 8,0130 si. museum building. Provide conceptual site and building design. Produce rendered conceptual elevations and ~cor plans for presentation display. Build a scale model of proposed design for display and fund raising. Tile total fee for this wor~ is as fo!lo',~: programming and conceptual design Presentation floor plans and renderings of building Scale model construction TOTAL 15,000,00 7,000.00 30,000.00 Should you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at anytime. Daniel A. Summers, AIA, V.P. 16A 2 RESOLUTION NO. 02- 4 2 0 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN STONEBRIDGE UNIT FOUR, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on October 28, 1997 approved the plat of Stonebridge Unit Four for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier Cotmty Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended), and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Stonebridge Unit Four, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Stonebridge Homeowners Association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ....... c" OCT - 8 2002 · ?." DAT.E':i ~.. ?,.. . : AT~ESTx~ ~ ?, i' BROCK, CLE~ ~ved as t~tb~'~ ~a''--~,e~.l nc~: Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: J~ N. COLEYTA, CI~AIRMAN RESOLUTION NO. 02- 4 2 J_ RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE AND WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN STONEBRIDGE UNIT FIVE, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE AND WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on September 1, 1998 approved the plat of Stonebridge Unit Five for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended), and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway, drainage and water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Review Department of Community Development Services has inspected the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is hereby granted for those roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in Stonebridge Unit Five, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Stonebridge Homeowners Association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. '.. OCT - 8 2002 ATTESt: I~,W.:IGHt-_~.. ~.ROCK, CLERK ~roved as t$ ~o~ and legal Patrick G. ~ite Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA J N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars ($245.00), arising out of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 2002-198 dated April 23, 2002, recorded in O.R. Book 3036, Pages 1508, et. seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by Palm River Estates, Inc. has been satisfied in full. Lot(s) 858, 859,860,861,862 and 863, Palm River Estates, Unit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3, Page 96, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Folio No. 65274920003 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Palm River Estates, Inc., and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Datedthis ~ dayof (~~ ,2002. DWIGHT E);BROCK, Clerk ".~,., '~... ~' , Deputy Clerk Attest a~ to Chairman'S ~ignature Approved as to form And legal sufficiency: homas C.-Paln~er Assistant County Attorney By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Jam~l~. Coletta, (~ha~rm~ - *** 3060122 OR: 3129 PG: 0295 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/11/2002 at 08:09AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK RHC ~HH 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EX? 7240 This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars ($245.00), arising out of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 2002-199 dated April 23, 2002, recorded in O.R. Book 3036, Pages 1510, et. seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by Palm River Estates, Inc. has been satisfied in full. Lot(s) 858, 859,860,861,862 and 863, Palm River Estates, Unit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3, Page 96, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Folio No. 65274880004 5 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Palm River Estates, Inc., and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~ day of ,2002. ', · ATTEST '~ ~ , :~ D,WIGHT E~BROCK, Clerk ' '::: , Deputy Clerk ltt st to Chalman'$' Signature only. Approved as to form And legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ja~~~- *** 3060121 OR: 3129 PG: 0294 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUN?¥, FL 10/11/2002 at 08:09AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC ~EE 6, O0 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFfiCE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 16A 6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Three Dollars and Seventy Five Cents ($3,673.75) arising out of the Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien dated August 22, 2002 and modified by Code Enforcement Board Order on Respondents' Request for Waiver of Fine/Lien dated August 22, 2002 waiving the fines but continuing the Order for operational costs in the amount of One Thousand Five Hundred Three Dollars and Seventy Five Cents ($1,503.75), and recorded at Official Records Book 3099, Pages 3474, et. Seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by Patrick and Erin Rose has been satisfied in full. THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST Folio No. 0000000438360804 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Patrick and Erin Rose, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~';f:~-~ day of (~ ~ ,2002. :/'DWIGHT E.BROCK, Clerk :'..g ~ ', ~.~i~ ~' , Del~uty Clerk Attest,as to Chatnman'$ signature onl$~ By: Approved as to form An~legal sufficiency: C/E~len T. Cha~lwell Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Jarr~s N. Coletta, -Chairma[ *** 3060127 OR: 3129 PG: 0300 *** Rg¢ORDgD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/11/2002 at 08:09AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK RBC ~ 6.00 COPIB8 1.00 Retn: CL)RK TO THE BOARD BX? 7240 This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 7 SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Seven Hundred Seventy Six Dollars and Forty Two Cents ($776.42), arising out of the Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien dated January 25, 2001, recorded in O.R. Book 2749, Pages 2159, et. seq., and modified by Code Enforcement Board Order on Respondents' Request for Wavier of Fine/Lien dated February 22, 2002, and recorded at Official Record Book 2787, Pages 2531, et seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by I.E.C. Rentals, Inc. and Ivy Jean Nebus has been satisfied in full. 36 49 25 N152 Fr OF FOIJ. DESC, COMM. CNT SEC, N 1609.19 Fl' TO POB, CONT N 396.69 FT, W 329.99 FT, S 396 FI', Folio No. 00275560003 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by I.E.C. Rentals Inc. and Ivy Jean Nebus, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ATTEST: '~/ ' ' DWIGHT E; BROCK, Clerk .~ :i~~~ By: , Deputy Clerk Attest as to Chairman's $1Onature Approved as to form An~ legal sufficiepcy: '~'~len T. Chadwell Assistant County Attorney ,2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA /,~_~ --~ !_ v--~.d Jam~. Coletta, Chairman" *** 3060128 OR: 3129 PG: 0301 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/11/2002 at 08:09AM DWIGR? E. BROCK, CLERK REC F~E 6,00 CO?IES 1,00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FhOOR BXT 7240 This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 16A SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars ($245.00), arising out of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 2002-200 dated April 23, 2002, recorded in O.R. Book 3036, Pages 1512, et. seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by Palm River Estates, Inc. has been satisfied in full. Lot(s) 858, 859,860,861,862 and 863, Palm River Estates, Unit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3, Page 96, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Folio No. 65274800000 8 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Palm River Estates, Inc., and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~"~ DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk , Deputy Clerk Attest as to Cha~rll~'S s~gnature only. Approved as to form And legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney ,2002. By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA i:lll~r'lN. %.~OIU;tti:l.,-X~ll~.ll lllillYr *** 3060129 OR: 3129 PG: 0302 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/11/2002 at 08:09AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK R~C F~ 6.00 C0PIB$ 1.00 Retn: CIBR~ TO ?HB BOARD INTBROFHC~ 47H FhOOR EX? 7240 This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Five Dollars ($255.00), arising out of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 2002-175 dated April 9, 2002, recorded in O.R. Book 3027, Pages 2685, et. seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by Palm River Estates, Inc. has been satisfied in full. Lot(s) 851,852, 853,855, 856 and 857, Palm River Estates, Unit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3, Page 96, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Folio No. 65274720009 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Palm River Estates, Inc., and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this J;~jt., day of C~~ ,2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk , Deputy Clerk A.~est as t:o Cha~rslan'$ s~gnature onl.y. Approved as to form And legal sufficiency: Thomfis C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA *** 3060130 OR: 3129 PG: 0303 RECORDED in OFHClAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/11/2002 at 08:09AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK RIC PEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTBROFHC~ {TH f~OOR EXT 7240 This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 16 10 SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars ($245.00), arising out of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 2002-181 dated April 9, 2002, recorded in O.R. Book 3027, Pages 2683, et. seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by Palm River Estates, Inc. has been satisfied in full. Lot(s) 851,852, 853, 855,856 and 857, Palm River Estates, Unit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3, Page 96, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Folio No. 65274760001 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Palm River Estates, Inc., and consents to this lien being discharged of record. ,.. Dated this J:~71~ D~GHT E. BROCK, Clerk By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Jame~ N. Coletta, Chairman"' Attest as to Chairman'S signature onl$, Approved as to form And legal sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney *** 3060126 OR: 3129 PG: 0299 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/11/2002 at 08:09AM DWIGHT ), BROCK, CLERK RBC FBB 6.00 COPIBS 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THB BOARD INTHROFFICB 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 16 11 SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars ($245.00), arising out of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 2002-182 dated April 9, 2002, recorded in O.R. Book 3027, Pages 2685, et. seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by Palm River Estates, Inc. has been satisfied in full. Lot(s) 851,852, 853,854, 855,856 and 857, Palm River Estates, Unit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3, Page 96, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Folio No. 65274720009 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Palm River Estates, Inc., and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~ day of ~~~,~.~ ,2002. DWIG~ E. BROCK, Clerk - t~y: t., ~ '~ Depute'Clerk Attest as to Chat~'$ signature 0n)l. Approved as to form And legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA J ame N.~~Coletta, C~lairman~ *** 3060125 OR: 3129 PG: 0298 *** RECORDED in O~FICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUN?¥, FL 10/11/2002 at 08:09AM DWIGH~ E. BROCK, CLERK R~C F~ 6,00 COPIES 1,00 Retn: CLBR~ gO g~ BOARD INTBROFFIC~ 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 16/1,12 SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars ($245.00), arising out of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 2002-196 dated April 23, 2002, recorded in O.R. Book 3036, Pages 1504, et. seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by Palm River Estates, Inc. has been satisfied in full. Lot(s) 858, 859, 860, 861,862 and 863, Palm River Estates, Unit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3, Page 96, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Folio No. 65275000003 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Palm River Estates, Inc., and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ,~eO"~ day of Q-~ ~ ,2002. ATTEST: ~ DWIGI{T I~,iiBROCK , Clerk , Deputy Clerk Attest as to Chairman'S signature Approved as to form And legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Jam~;~N. Coletta, Uha~rm~fl" *** 3060124 OR: 3129 PG: 0297 *** RECORDED in OFFICIA~ RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/11/2002 at 08:09AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK R~C ~E 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR gXT 7240 This instrument prepared by: Janet Powers, Operations Manager Code Enforcement 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 403-2440 SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars ($245.00), arising out of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 2002-197 dated April 23, 2002, recorded in O.R. Book 3036, Pages 1506, et. seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property, and all other real and personal property, located in Collier County, which is owned by Palm River Estates, Inc. has been satisfied in full. Lot(s) 858, 859,860,861,862 and 863, Palm River Estates, Unit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3, Page 96, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Folio No. 65274960005 The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release this lien as to the whole of the above-described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Palm River Estates, Inc., and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this ~ day of (~)~ ,2002. DWIGI-I~{t~. BROCK, Clerk ~ Dep~t~ Clerk Attest as to Chatmaa'$ signature 0~15. Approved as to form And legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Jam~ Coletta, Chmrman *** 3060123 OR: 3129 PG: 0296 *** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/11/2002 at 08:09AM DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK RBC FEB 6.00 ~ COPIES 1,00 R~tn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTBROFFICH 4TH FLOOR BXT 7240 This instrument prepared by and after recording return to: Leo J. Salvatori, Esq. Quarles & Brady LLP 4501 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 RENEWAL TEMPORARY PARKING EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, made this ~',~,a~ day of ', ~ , 2002, between CPOC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.L.c., a Delawar~ lif-nited liability company, as GRANTOR, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, as GRANTEE. (Wherever used herein, the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations.) WHEREAS, the parties hereto previously entered into a Temporary Parking Easement recorded in Official Records Book & ~ 7&, page / ? ¢, o , of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, which expired July 26, 2002. WHEREAS, the parties wish to renew said Easement in accordance with the terms contained herein. WITNE S SETH: GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS and other valuable consideration paid by the GRANTEE, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, a temporary, non-exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and park automobiles on lands located in Collier County, Florida, described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by virtue of this reference (the "Easement Area"). By acceptance hereof, Grantee does hereby agree as follows: This Easement is given for the purpose of allowing Grantee to park automobiles upon the premises owned by Grantor and described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and for no other purpose. The temporary parking easement given by Grantor to Grantee herein shall be for use of employees of the Division of Community and Environment Services of Collier County, and for no other purpose. In particular and without limitation, no other agency of Collier County, nor members of the public, are authorized to park in the Easement Area as a result of this temporary parking easement. QBNAP\367478.1 16A14 o o This Easement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect on October 30, 2003. Grantee may terminate this easement prior to the termination date herein upon sixty (60) days prior written notice to Grantor. Grantor shall not have any obligation to make any improvements to the Easement Area, Grantee specifically accepting the same in their "as is" condition. Grantee shall be responsible for complying with all statutes, laws and regulations as the same relate to the Easement Area and the intended uses thereof. No improvements shall be constructed upon the Easement Area, unless and until such time as Grantee has provided Grantor with plans and specifications for the same, and Grantor has approved of the same, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any such improvements shall be constructed at Grantee's sole expense. At the conclusion of the term of this Easement Agreement, Grantee shall, upon demand of Grantor, remove said improvements, all at Grantee's sole cost and expense. As consideration for the granting of this Easement and the Renewal Temporary Staging Easement ("Staging Easement") executed by the parties of even date herewith, and commencing August 1, 2002, Grantee shall pay to Grantor Four Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($4,200.00) per month and all other costs associated with the Easement Area, including but not limited to, taxes and property owner association assessments. Said monthly fee and expenses shall be paid to Grantor on the first day of each month at Lund Capital Group, Attention: Chad Lund, 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 350, Naples Florida 34103. Upon execution of this Easement, Grantee shall pay Grantor said monthly fee for the months of July through October at the above-referenced address. Payment of said monthly fee and expenses shall continue to be due and payable as long either this Easement or the Staging Easement is in full force and effect. Grantee does hereby agree that Grantee shall hold Grantor harmless, and indemnify Grantor, against any and all losses or damage that Grantor may suffer as a result of Grantee's use of this Easement Area. Grantee does hereby agree that as a condition precedent to utilizing the Easement Area for its intended purposes, that Grantee shall provide Grantor with evidence of liability insurance in an amount no less than $1,000,000 per single occurrence, and $2,000,000 aggregate coverage, underwritten by companies reasonably acceptable to Grantor; or, in the alternative, provide Grantor with evidence reasonably acceptable to Grantor that Grantee's self-insurance program has sufficient proceeds and liquidity to pay any claims. Grantee does hereby agree that Grantee shall not store, transport, dispose, or otherwise utilize any hazardous materials upon the Easement Area, nor permit others to do so. For purposes of this Easement Agreement, the term "hazardous materials" shall deemed to be any materials deemed by any federal, state, or local statute, ordinance or regulation to be capable of environmental contamination. Grantee does hereby agree that Grantee shall hold Grantor harmless, and indemnify Grantor, from any and all losses or damages that Grantor may suffer as a result of a violation of this paragraph, which obligation shall survive the termination of this Easement Agreement. QBNAP\367478.1 - 2 - sole cost and expense. Any and all other materials or improvements that Grantee should locate, store or construct upon the premises described on Exhibit "A" including, but not limited to, excess fill that Grantor does not demand from Grantee, shall be removed from the Easement Area by Grantee upon the conclusion of this Easement Agreement, all at Grantee's sole cost and expense. Grantee does hereby further agree that upon termination of this Easement Agreement, Grantee shall clean the subject site, and grade the same to its current elevation, all at Grantee's sole cost and expense. o Grantee does hereby agree that the parking garage that Grantee shall be constructing on the premises described Exhibit "B" shall be designed and located in such a fashion so as to allow Grantor to construct a building on the premises described on Exhibit "A-2" as close as 20 feet away from the common boundary between the premises described in Exhibit "A-2", and those described in Exhibit "B". Grantee does hereby agree that Grantee shall not locate its parking garage any closer than 20 feet to said common boundary. The terms and provisions of this Paragraph 8 shall survive the termination of this Temporary Staging Area Easement Agreement. In the event that Grantee should violate any terms and provisions of this Easement Agreement, Grantor shall have the right to pursue all of its lawful remedies; and, further, the right to terminate this Easement Agreement. 10. In the event that any action is instituted to enforce or interpret the terms of this Easement Agreement, the parties hereto do hereby agree that the prevailing party shall be entitled to the recovery of all reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred, including, but not limited to, those incident to any appeal. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the GRANTEE and its assigns, together with the right to enter upon said land and excavate and take materials for the purpose of constructing, operating, and maintaining facilities thereon consistent herewith. GRANTOR and GRANTEE are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. W~s~(-l"( Print n am?6-~J/o,w' )1 /Witnes~2 (Print n~e below) CPOC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (Corporate Seal) By: TCL REALTY, INC., an Illinois corporation, as Man~ff Thomas C. Lund, as President QBNAP\367752.1 - 3 - COLLIER COUNTY, a political Jam~ N. Cole tt a, Chairman Approved as to legal sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney Thomas C. Palmer , as STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was ~ acknowledged before me this ~ilc-'~ day of ~f,_~ , 2002, by Thomas C. Lund, as President of TCL REALTY, INC., an illinois corporation, as Manager of CPOC Development Company, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, who is personally known to me. (SEAL) Signature of ~ot~ary Print i'4,*.d, C omr ssio. Number: My commission expires: QBNAD,367752.1 - 4 - This instrument prepared by and after recording return to: Leo J. Salvatori, Esq. Quarles & Brady LLP 4501 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 RENEWAL TEMPORARY STAGING EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, made this.~~ day of,-~'?~.' 2002, between CPOC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.L.C., a Delaware li :ed naoility company, as GRANTOR, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, as GRANTEE. (Wherever used herein, the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations.) WHEREAS, the parties hereto previously entered into a Temporary Staging Easement recorded in Official Records Book ~a-i~ 7~.---, page ? ~:1/,, 6, , of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, which expired July 26, 2002. WHEREAS, the parties wish to renew said Easement in accordance with the terms contained herein. WITNESSETH: GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS and other valuable consideration paid by the GRANTEE, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, a temporary, non-exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and store non-hazardous materials and equipment on lands described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Easement Area"), which materials and equipment are to be utilized in the construction of a parking garage by Grantee upon the premises described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. By acceptance hereof, Grantee does hereby agree as follows: This Easement is given for the purpose of allowing Grantee utilize the premises owned by Grantor upon the premises described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto as a staging area for construction of a parking garage by Grantee upon the premises described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and for no other purpose. This Easement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect on October 30, 2003. Grantee may terminate this easement prior to the termination date herein upon sixty (60) days prior written notice to Grantor. QBN AP~,367752.1 16 ,14 Grantor shall not have any obligation to make any improvements to the Easement Area, Grantee specifically accepting the same in their "as is" condition. Grantee shall be responsible for complying with all statutes, laws and regulations as the same relate to the Easement Area and the intended uses thereof. No improvements shall be constructed upon the Easement Area, unless and until such time as Grantee has provided Grantor with plans and specifications for the same, and Grantor has approved of the same, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any such improvements shall be constructed at Grantee's sole expense. At the conclusion of the term of this Easement Agreement, Grantee shall, upon demand of Grantor, remove said improvements, all at Grantee's sole cost and expense. As consideration for the granting of this Easement and the Renewal Temporary Parking Easement ("Parking Easement") executed by the parties of even date herewith, and commencing July 1, 2002, Grantee shall pay to Grantor Four Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($4,200.00) per month and all other costs associated with the Easement Area, including but not limited to, taxes and property owner association assessments. Said monthly fee and expenses shall be paid to Grantor on the first day of each month at Lund Capital Group, Attention: Chad Lund, 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 350, Naples Florida 34103. Upon execution of this Easement, Grantee shall pay Grantor said monthly fee for the months of July through October at the above-referenced address. Payment of said monthly fee and expenses shall continue to be due and payable as long either this Easement or the Parking Easement is in full force and effect. o Grantee does hereby agree that Grantee shall hold Grantor harmless, and indemnify Grantor, against any and all losses or damage that Grantor may suffer as a result of Grantee's use of this Easement Area. Grantee does hereby agree that as a condition precedent to utilizing the Easement Area for its intended purposes, that Grantee shall provide Grantor with evidence of liability insurance in an amount no less than $1,000,000 per single occurrence, and $2,000,000 aggregate coverage, underwritten by companies reasonably acceptable to Grantor; or, in the altemative, provide Grantor with evidence reasonably acceptable to Grantor that Grantee's self-insurance program has sufficient proceeds and liquidity to pay any claims. Grantee does hereby agree that Grantee shall not store, transport, dispose, or otherwise utilize any hazardous materials upon the Easement Area, nor permit others to do so. For purposes of this Easement Agreement, the term "hazardous materials" shall deemed to be any materials deemed by any federal, state, or local statute, ordinance or regulation to be capable of environmental contamination. Grantee does hereby agree that Grantee shall hold Grantor harmless, and indemnify Grantor, from any and all losses or damages that Grantor may suffer as a result of a violation of this paragraph, which obligation shall survive the termination of this Easement Agreement. Grantee has advised Grantor that Grantee anticipates storing fill on the Easement Area. Grantee does hereby agree that in the event there should be any excess fill that Grantor does not utilize in the construction of the contemplated parking garage, that Grantee shall, on Grantor's demand, convey to Grantor all or such portion of the same demanded by Grantor, and store the same on the premises described on Exhibit "A", all at Grantee's QBNAP\367752.1 - 2 - 16 14 In the event that Grantee should violate any terms and provisions of this Easement Agreement, Grantor shall have the right to pursue all of its lawful remedies; and, further, the right to terminate this Easement Agreement. In the event that any action is instituted to enforce or interpret the terms of this Easement A~eement, the parties hereto do hereby agree that the prevailing party shall be entitled to the recovery of all reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred, including, but not limited to, those incident to any appeal. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the GRANTEE and its assig-ns, together with the right to enter upon said land and excavate and take materials for the purpose of constructing, operating, and maintaining facilities thereon consistent herewith. GRANTOR and GRANTEE are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. Approved as to legal sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney CPOC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (Corporate Seal) By: TCL REALTY, INC., an Illinois corporation, as ...M~ger Thomas C. Lund, as ~res~ent - COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the S4ate of FlOrida Ja~F NJ C~±~'tt-~, ~-'irman Thomas C. Palmer , as STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER QBNAPL367478. I -3- 16A14 The foregoing instrument was ~ acknowledged before me this _~!--~- day of L"~-eCd_ , 2002, by Thomas C. Lund, as President of TCL REALTY, INC., an Illinois corporation, as Manager of CPOC Development Company, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, who is personally known to me. (SEAL) Signature of Notary Print Name: .~i/qJ/~ Commission Number My commission expires. QBNAP\367478.1 -4- Jun-30-03 14:57 From-Cotller County Purchasing 941 ?32 0844 T-45T P 001/007 F-010 33Ol E. Ta~niamt Trail Napms Fl,_ .'~112 Phone: 2:~.Cj-T74-8967 F~x, 239-13Z~844 To: ~ Fa~c ?~4-937~ From: ,Sue Date=. June 30, 2003 Phone: Page: Six (6) plus cover [-] Urgent [] For Review [] Please Comment [] Please Reply [] Please Recycle .Commen~: HI Gloria Here i~ the PO #312211 and the attached papenNad~ Hope this works for Youi Sue 14:~Z From-Collier County Purchas~ni 041 732 0844 Sf~ND INVOICES '[O; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSrONERS ATTN: FINANCE DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 413016 NAPLES, FLOR[DA 34101-3016 VENDOR NUMBER: CF_RT S-T-~.L CO. 2545 MDSSON AVENU-~- ~T ~ERS, FL T-457 P 00Z/007 F-010 l,"'- ',:";' '" ;,r~.~. ';-,; ORZGINAL DA'?E SHIP TO NUMBER: 000072 26~5 SO~TH HORSeShOE DRIVE NAPLES. FL 3q204 3.0/22. 160-I62519-763100-66069 I. CONSTRUC-m'r,ON OF ,~4ED!AP~ LP}'iSSCAPE PLz~MT~R ON 2 - I. 00 EA D~E. UCT ALT ~ 2 !,I:3}~5' ~OLE ~_470. OCO0 52470. 2000 128C . 2000. TAX EXEMPTION (FL.) NO. 21-07-.019995-53,C Jo"r AL ill750,00 FOLLOW UP INFORMATION, COMMENTS, ETC. Jun-30-03 14:52 From-Collier County Purchaslna 0844 T-45F P.O03/O0~ F-OtO 16BI WORK ORDER # CT-02-02 "General Contractor's Services" 'Cmztra~ ~4Y2-~49, Dated 5~tember 2,~, 2002 This Work Order is for ~3eneral Con~r's Servlcea, subject to the terms and cor, clitlons ot the C~ntr~t referenced aJ~ove, for work Icnown as: Project: Bavshore B~_d_~ B~ami~cafion. Me_~m Plantem The work is specified in the proposal dated 9/! 2/02 trom Chris-Tel Construction Company, wlMch is attached hereto and made par~ of this Work Order. In ~.ccorclance with terms an0 conditior~ of the Agreement referenced aloove, Work Order #CT-02-O2 is assigned to Chris-Tel Construction Company. TAsk I: Sohedule of Work: Sma Work within f'~een {15) clays of Notice of Award, Substantially Complete all work for E~'tgineer's Punch I.~ review within sixty (BO} days after Notice of Contract Award. F~nal completion after punch list review within ninety {90) days ~~_,~: In accordimce with Item 3 of the Agreement, the County will compensate the Rrm in acoordance with thu negotiated lump sum amount pmvldecl In the schedule below. Task I: $5~,750,00 Ally change marlo aul~sequent to f~al deparmlent approval will be considered an additional service and charged ac,~ot~ling to an executed Change Order as enumm'ated In Exhibit [] of the Agreement. Jun-30-03 14:hZ From-golller gounty Purcha~lni 941 T3Z 0844 T-4§T P 004/00? F-010 R£VI~tNEI:~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: _..~j~.~ Approved as to Form and legal sufficiency: A~'sis~ant County Attorney Jun-30-03 14:53 From-Collier County Purchas~ni 941 7'32 0644 T-457 P 005/00? F-010 ee~/~2/2B82 11:16 941226BSla3 Ct'RiS ~ r~ ~ Ami ~ I~l: Cra,ami= Furnish md lrudn]l ~2mnliG ttl= ~n Ecu of Paint. Dedu~ ~ Light Pale Baas. Oetels ImslatmtlOfl of ~ fight paid basee for wark by ~dUCt,Alt. ~ TOTAL BID After wodc orator aw"~-d, w~ agree to submil the fail'aw'lng item wilhin ~n (1D) day~ 1. Detaited Ag4;heelule ~VeJue~ for ltema ar work. · F~. carnpJ~afl attm' pum:h list review ~thJn AL'my (gO) days. ~ ay. Jun-30-03 14:53 From-Collier County Purchas~ni 941 ?3Z 0844 T-457 P 006/007 F-010 LIb"T OF~.SU~ICONTRACTORS · ' ' at' wad( ta be erlarm~a ay e. am, nrta mat suon ,mu wm n~ ~,-...u,.~/. tl'l~ Project 8nci the ~= . P' ....... .--, .- ...... 'r~. ,,,,4--mi,,n~,, n~r alfred u~ithout wrlt~n . - .............. ~-"" '-s defined in Ordinanco B7-25 and Section 15 of Irmlrucllons lo umaersj aha rnm~; a,I 1~3a, mqu applicab~ to and neaess~ ~ ttds Agmement,~mcludln_gL_b_ut__n_o.t ~r~n~'_~l._?~ pra~p.~_~ .fi.,a,~.n~,. bidder Who inclucie~ nan.compliant or nan-qummeo sutmantmamm m m~/rl=:r ma an~r. mm=, County may direct the bidcler/eantrac~r ta mmave/mplac~ any ~ubcantractor that is found to be nan- aarnpliaat w~h this requirement sul~eque~ to aw'4M cd' the contract at n~ acld~anal cost t= County, THIS LIST MUST BE COMPLETED OR 8ID WILL BE DE;EZMED (Atta~ additional sheet~ as needed). ~c~r end Address Class of Work to_be Perform~ NON-RESPONSIVE. . Jun-3O-03 14:53 From-Collier County Purchaslni 941 732 0844 89/-~2'/2~i2 ,11:I6 =J412,?.61~583 ~ ~ ~T~I~ ~UFAC~RE~ T-457 P OOT/O0? F-OIO 1681 change will be allowed attar suDmlttel of Bid. If suave= -,-~,-, ~, ~P~- --,~ appm~ ~ ~Bm~, ~'" _ ~ ~ _~_, .--.~.~ .. ,h~ ' ~T MUST BE COMP~ OR BiD ~ BE D~F~ NON-~SPONS~ _ ~ MAN~FACTURER ,. _ 16C1 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 20, 2003 160 1 MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Re: October 10, 2002 Amanda Oswald, Operations Coordinator Department of Parks and Recreation Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Agreement with the District School Board of Collier County for transporting school age Summer Camp Participants Enclosed please find one original agreement as referenced above, (Agenda Item #16D1), approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 8, 2002. I am retaining one original for the record and have copied same to the Finance Department. If you should have any questions, please contact me at extension 8406. Thank you. Enclosure 160 ! TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT FOR NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS TRANSPORTING SCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this ~ day o£ ~)~ ,2002 by and between the DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA and, COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION. WHEREAS, Chapter 234 o£ the Florida Statutes authorizes local school districts to enter into agreements with nonprofit corporations and nonprofit civic associations and groups for the transportation o£ school age children £or activities sponsored by these organizations, and WHEREAS, the Organization is a nonprofit corporation or nonprofit civic association, and WHEREAS, the School Board desires to assist the Organization in providing transportation to school age children £or activities sponsored by the organization, and WHEREAS, this Agreement contemplates three (3) use options with concomitant reimbursement available to the organization. IT 1S THEREFORE AGREED: that the school board shall provide buses, drivers or ESE attendants in accordance with the terms provided herein: 1. Option A - Bus and Driver a. Organization shall reimburse the School Board £or each vehicle with driver at the rate o£$18.31 per hour and $1.14 per operated mile for each bus and driver plus a £ee (labor rate as needed) £or cleaning and maintenance. b. Operated mile is defined as every mile driven for each bus operated in support o£ the Agency's Program, whether with passengers or not, and to include necessary trips to and from a School Board Transportation Department. Mileage will be recorded and billed by the School Board. c. Such bus will only be operated by employees o£ the Organization who are licensed and approved as school bus drivers by the Department o£ Transportation o£ the School Board. d. Organization will be billed a minimum o£two hours plus mileage. Option B - Mus, Driver and ESE Attendant a. Agency shall reimburse the School Board at the rate of $30.87 per hour and $1.14 per operated mile for each vehicle with driver and ESE attendant plus a fee (labor rate as needed) for cleaning and maintenance b. Agency shall be billed a minimum of two hours plus mileage for each vehicle with driver and ESE attendant. o o Option C- Bus Only a. Agency shall reimburse the School Board at the rate of $1.14 per operated mile for each bus. b. Each bus will be returned to the Transportation Department of the School board at the end of each operating day. c. Agency will be assessed a cleaning fee (labor rate as needed) for each bus checked back if it is not clean. d. Buses will only be operated by employees of the Agency who are licensed and approved as school bus drivers by the Department of Transportation of the School Board. The Agency agrees that all requests for use of buses, drivers and ESE attendants will be made at least two weeks prior to the date requested. All service is contingent upon bus and/or driver and/or ESE attendant availability. The Agency agrees that in the event of a cancellation the School Board will be given at least 24 hours advance notice. In the event the notice of cancellation issued to the School Board is less than 24 hours, a 2 hour charge per vehicle will be due and payable to the School Board. Payment for services rendered or due shall be assessed by the School Board by the 10th of each month and paid by the Agency by the 30th Of each month. Agency shall provide the School Board with evidence of liability insurance in connection with this agreement. The Agency, pursuant of Section 234.211 (2)(b), Fla. Stat., shall for purposes of liability for negligence be covered by Section 768.28, Fla. Stat. The Agency agrees that there shall be no fee charged to passengers on the bus. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Effective January 1, 1995, each Agency entering into a Transportation Agreement with Collier County Public Schools under Option C shall comply fully with the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991. The Act requires persons who are operators of commercial motor vehicles, including school bus drivers, and who are subject to the requirement of a Commercial Driver License (CDL), be tested for drugs and alcohol in compliance with the Act. The Agency may utilize the school district's approved testing lab and the Agency shall pay the costs for each person tested by the laboratory. The use of vehicles by the Agency shall at all times be subject to rules adopted by the School Board. The Agreement shall commence on the date first above written and remain in effect through August 31, 2003. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement between the parties and may not be amended except by written instrument signed by all parties hereto. All the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the parties and their legal representatives, successors and assigns. 16B 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement of the day and year first above written. Signed in the Presence of' Print Name: DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY BY: Dr. Dan W. White, Superintendent Print Name: BY: Anne Goodnight, Chair Print Name: COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION Name: Title: Print Name: BY: Name: Title: Attest as to Chairman's signature BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE October 8, 2002 163 FOR BOARD ACTION: 1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED: 1 mo Co Clerk of Courts: Submitted for public record, pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1), the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period: 1. Disbursements for September 7, 2002 through September 13, 2002. 2. Disbursements for September 14, 2002 through September 20, 2002. Districts: Collier Soil and Water Conservation District_- Agenda for August 21, 2002, Agenda for June 19, 2002; Agenda for September 18, 2002, Minutes of August 21, 2002. Naples Heritage Community Development District - Agenda for Meeting Dates for FY 2003. o Mediterra South Community Development District - Agenda Minutes of June 26, 2002 and Unauditied Financial Stmnt. 4. Immokalee Water & Sewer District - Adopted Budget FY 2002-03. o Heritage Greens Community Development District - Minutes of Meeting May 13, 2002, Audit FY 2001 and Management Ltr. o Cedar Hammock Community Development District - Minutes of Meeting May 13, 2002. Audit FY 2001 and Management Ltr. Naples Heritage Community Development District - Schedule of Meetings FY 2003 and District Map. Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Fire Rescue District - Audited Finacial Statements and Management Letter. Fiddlers Creek Community Development District Minutes of July 24, 2002 and Unaudited Financial Statements dated 6/30/02. Minutes: H:DatadFormat o o o o 11. 12. 13. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee_- Agenda for September 18, 2002. Immokalee Beautification Advisory Committee_- Agenda for August 21, 2002. Hispanic Affairs Advisory Board - Notice of Meeting and Agenda for August 29, 2002. Collier County Planning Commission - Agenda for September 19, 2002, Minutes of August 1, 2002; Agenda for September 5, 2002, Minutes of July 18, 2002. Collie County Citizens Advisory Task Force - Agenda for September 12, 2002. Collier County Contractors' Licensing Board - Agenda for August 21, 2002. Historic & Archaeological Preservation Board - Agenda for August 21, 2002. Bayshore Gateway Triangle Local Redev. Advisory Board - Agenda for September 11, 2002. Workforce Housing Advisory Committee - Minutes of August 19, 2002 Isles of Capri Fire/Rescue Advisory Board - Minutes of March 7, 2002 and April 4, 2002. Pelican Bay MSTU Advisory Committee - Agenda for September 4, 2002, Minutes of August 7, 2002, Minutes of August 20, 2002. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee - Minutes for March 15, 2002, April 5, 2002 and May 9, 2002. Environmental Advisory Council - Agenda for September 4, 2002, Minutes of July 3, 2002. H:Data/Format Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County, Florida Finance & Accounting Department MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Re: 09/13/02 Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners Constance C. Murray, General Operations Manager Finance Department/Clerk to the Board Board of County Commissioners Disbursements Please find attached a listing of the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period September 7,2002 through September 13, 2002. In accordance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1) I request that these reports be included as miscellaneous correspondence to the Board of County Commissioners and made part of the official records. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please telephone me at 774- 8481. Q:/Manual CheckslAPMLOG BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A/P Manual Check Log DATE ISSUED TO: CK# AMOUNT 1 9~5~2002 City of Everglades 9~5~2002 Wal-Mart 9~6~2002 Kraft Construction 9/11/2002 Check Run Beginning 9/11/2002 Check Run Ending 464 465 466 588685 589424 20,838.00 2,259.48 763,816.45 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 303477 589266 VENDOR 900040 - :PHYLLIS HAMILTON 04501140200 PHYLLIS HAMIL 408-000000-115001-00000 196 MADISON DR. PHYLLIS HAMILTON 16J CHECK NO 20041002 589031 VENDOR 271770 - AA ELECTRONICS S.E. INC. 256326 408-233352-652910-00000 202535 EQUIP AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 20040722 589067 VENDOR 285940 - AACTION MULCH OF SW FL, INC. 305 111-163646-646318-00000 201898 MULCH I i PAGE CHECK NO 20040731 588973 VENDOR 237370 - ABB WATER METERS INC. 5235 408-253212-655100-00000 200195 METERS VCHR NET CHECK NO 20040727 589073 VENDOR 288960 - ABLE BODY TEMPORARY SERVICE 115008885 200061 TEMPS 109-182602-634999-00000 109-182901-634999-00000 320-183800-634999-00000 322-183825-634999-00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 CHECK NO 20040747 588720 VENDOR 101338 201279 MAINT 120 - ACCENT BUSINESS PRODUCTS 130-157710-646710-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30.00 CHECK NO 20040748 588721 VENDOR 101385 202235 SVS 130 - ACCENT BUSINESS PRODUCTS 001-156110-646710-00000 0.00 108.64 0.00 108.64 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 108.64 6,099.60 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 167,094.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,291.53 0.00 812.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,099.60 6,099.60 167,094.00 167,094.00 5,103.84 5,103.84 0.00 132.00 0.00 132.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 165.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 165.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040723 589233 VENDOR 361730 - ADAMS & O'REILLY, INC. 361730 119-156342-652210-00000 206751 FOOD 0.00 CHECK NO 20040754 589115 VENDOR 317580 - ADECCO 58803363 204370 LABOR 408-210151-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041104 589156 PP #25 PP #25 VENDOR 335370 - ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040726 20040726 20040726 20040721 20040721 20040721 20040721 20040726 20040721 589062 4702 201511 LABOR 4605 201511 LABOR 4618 201511 LABOR 4598 201511 LABOR 4585 201511 LABOR 4589 201511 LABOR 4587 201511 LABOR 4626 201511 LABOR 4695 201511 LABOR VENDOR 282670 - ADVANCED AIR & REFRIGERATION, INC. 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 5,031.00 CHECK TOTAL 416.86 CHECK TOTAL 247.50 CHECK TOTAL 112.50 25.00 25.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 150.00 75.00 250.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 I PAGE VCHR NET 132.00 5,031.00 5,031.00 416.86 416.86 247.50 247.50 112.50 25.00 25.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 150.00 75.00 250.00 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040721 4599 201511 LABOR 20040726 4610 201511 LABOR 20040721 4597 201511 LABOR 20040726 4595 201511 LABOR 20040726 4625 201511 LABOR 20040726 4613 201511 LABOR 20040726 4614 201511 LABOR 20040726 4627 201511 LABOR 20040726 4609 201511 LABOR 20040726 4601 201511 LABOR 20040721 4583 201511 LABOR 20040721 4596 201511 LABOR 20040721 4590 201511 LABOR 20040726 4619 201511 LABOR 20040721 4582 201511 LABOR 20040726 4621 201511 LABOR 20040726 4622 201511 LABOR DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 25.00 0.00 VCHR NET 25.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 175.00 0.00 175.00 325.00 0.00 325.00 125.00 0.00 125.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 225.00 0.00 225.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 200.00 0.00 200.00 175.00 0.00 175.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 175.00 0.00 175.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040726 20040726 20040726 20040726 20040721 20040726 20040721 20040726 20040726 20040721 20040721 20040726 20040726 20040721 20040726 20040726 20040721 DESCRIPTION 4603 201511 LABOR 4623 201511 LABOR 4616 201511 LABOR 4620 201511 LABOR 4586 201511 LABOR 4602 201511 LABOR 4592 201511 LABOR 4612 201511 LABOR 4607 201511 LABOR 4593 201511 LABOR 4584 201511 LABOR 4606 201511 LABOR 4624 201511 LABOR 4594 201511 LABOR 4611 201511 LABOR 4615 201511 LABOR 2591 201511 LABOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 AMT NET 25.00 100.00 375.00 25.00 75.00 125.00 25.00 100.00 25.00 50.00 25.00 50.00 150.00 25.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 i PAGE VCHR NET 25.00 100.00 375.00 25.00 75.00 125.00 25.00 100.00 25.00 50.00 25.00 50.00 150.00 25.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040726 4600 201511 LABOR 20040726 4617 201511 LABOR 20040721 4588 201511 LABOR 20040726 4608 201511 LABOR 20040726 4604 201511 LABOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303653 589374 VENDOR 900050 - AERIAL RESTORATION CONTRACTORS REF 355304 AERIAL COMPANI 113-000000-115420-00000 REF 355304 AERIAL COMPANIES 0.00 CHECK NO 20041152 589021 VENDOR 264920 - AIRBORNE EXPRESS R6125744 001-155410-641950-00000 159841 AIR EXPRESS SERVICE 0.00 CHECK NO 20040505 588899 VENDOR 172480 - ALAN PRODUCTIONS 0725 02 D CAPLINGER 681-410310-634406-00000 0725 02 D CAPLINGER 0.00 CHECK NO 20041138 589223 VENDOR 360300 - ALEXANDER YOUNG 8:15- 11:15 3 HRS 681-431590-634402-00000 8:15- 11:15 3 HRS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041139 589231 VENDOR 361520 - ALICIA M FERRER 8-30 12-30 4 HRS 681-431590-634402-00000 8-30 12-30 4 HRS 0.00 AMT NET 75.00 50.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 72.00 CHECK TOTAL 70.61 CHECK TOTAL 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 48.00 CHECK TOTAL 64.00 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 75.00 50.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 4,187.50 72.00 72.00 70.61 70.61 150.00 150.00 48.00 48.00 64. O0 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041139 8-30 11-30 3 HRS 8-30 11-30 3 HRS 20041139 8:30-11:30 3 HRS 8:30 11:30 3 HRS 20041139 8-12 4 HRS 8-12 4 HRS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041014 20041014 588842~ VENDOR 127610 - ALL ANIMALS CLINIC 02-10487 M.ERNST 610-155410-631970-00000 200590 M. ERNST 02-10487 M. ERNST 02-10486 610-155410-631970-00000 200590 M. ERNST 02-10486 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040750 588722 VENDOR 420 - ALLENS AUTO PARTS 682094 101-i63620-652990-00000 201495 AUTO PARTS 0.00 CHECK NO 20040725 20040724 588816 VENDOR 109450 - ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORPORATION I0293103 408-253211-652310-00000 202568 CHEMICALS I0290820 408-233352-652310-00000 200741 CHEMICALS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041131 20041010 20041074 20041075 589121 VFB2BTS 8-15 VFBSBTS 8-15 VFB2CiU7 8/15 VFB2CiU7 8/15 200001 VFB2DSR 8/15 206367 VFB2DSR 8/15 VFB2F3P 8/15/02 201129 VFB2F3P 8/15/02 VENDOR 318980 - ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 101-163630-641700-00000 001-138710-634999-00000 111-138911-641700-00000 101-163620-641700-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 48.00 48.00 64.00 CHECK TOTAL 65.00 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 208.81 CHECK TOTAL 1,187.70 1,605.74 CHECK TOTAL 1,045.05 185,96 127,55 242.28 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 iPAGE VCHR NET 48.00 48.00 64.00 224.00 65.00 45.00 110.00 208.81 208.81 1,187.70 1,605.74 2,793.44 1,045.05 185.96 127.55 242.28 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041069 VFB2B6S 8/16 200269 VFB2B6S 8/16 20041073 VFB2BWV 8/15 203698 VFB2BWV 8/15 20041074 VFB2DSR 8/15/02 206367 VFB2DSR 8/15/02 20041011 VFB2CS3 8/15 VFB2CS3 8/15 205897 20041073 VFB2BWV 8/15 203698 VFB2BWV 8/15 20041074 VFB2DS4 7/15 206367 VFB2DS4 7/15 20041075 VFB2CGF 8/15/02 201129 VFB2CGF 8/15/02 20041134 VFB2B6Q 8-15-02 VFB2B6Q 200269 20041074 VFB2DS2 8/15 206367 VFB2DS2 8/15 20041012 VFB2BTR 8/15 202581VFB2BTR 8/15 20041073 VFB2BWV 8/15 203698 VFB2BWV 8/15 20041075 VFB2BTT 8/15/02 VFB2BTT 8/15/02 20041073 VFB2BWV 8/15 20040995 203699 VFB2BWV 8/15 VFB2BWG 200043 SVS 7/16-8/15 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 113-138915-641700-00000 0.00 111-156381-641700-00000 0.00 111-138911-641700-00000 0.00 111-138721-641700-00000 0.00 111-156390-641700-00000 0.00 111-138911-641700-00000 0.00 101-163620-641700-00000 0.00 113-138915-641700-00000 0.00 111-138911-641700-00000 0.00 001-172910-641150-00000 0.00 111-156332-641700-00000 0.00 101-163620-641700-00000 0.00 111-156341-641700-00000 0.00 111-156343-641700-00000 0.00 111-156349-641700-00000 0.00 111-156395-641700-00000 0.00 111-156425-641700-00000 0.00 130-157710-641700-00000 0.00 111-156380-641700-00000 0.00 109-182602-641700-00000 0.00 109-182901-641700-00000 0.00 778-182701-641700-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 325.00 0.00 2.16 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 325.00 2.16 161.67 0.00 161.67 88.70 0.00 88.70 0.96 0.00 0.96 449.92 0.00 449.92 89.75 0.00 89.75 1.194.60 0.00 1,194.60 231.80 0.00 231.80 149.99 0.00 149.99 289.92 0.00 289.92 307.14 0.00 307.14 221.88 143.29 12.46 46.60 41.33 86.91 38.34 0.00 185.06 211.48 187.38 0.00 590.81 583.92 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040995 DESCRIPTION VFB2BWF 8/15 VFB2BWF 8/15 200481 20041075 VFB2F3H 8/15/02 201129 VFB2F3H 8/15/02 20041073 VFB2BWV 8/15 203698 VFB2BWV 8/15 20041074 VFB2DS9 8/15 206367 VFB2DS9 8/15 20041074 VFB2DS3 7/15 206367 VFB2DS3 7/15 20041006 VFBCNM 8/15 VFBCNM 8/15 205612 20041074 VFB2DS3 8/15 206367 VFB2DS3 20041074 VFB2DS9 7/15 206367 VFB2DS9 7/15 20041074 VFB2DS4 8/15 206367 VFB2DS4 8/15 20041072 VFB2BWT 8/15/02 201706 VFB2BWT 8/15/02 20041071 VFB2DQZ 8/15/02 VFB2DQZ 8/15/02 20041074 VFB2DSZ 7/15 206367 VFB2DSZ 7/15 20041074 VFB2DS2 7/15 206367 VFB2DS2 7/15 20041074 VFB2DSZ 8/15/02 206367 8/15/02 20041073 VFB2BWV 8/15 203698 VFB2BWV 8/15 20041013 VFB2BTR 7/15 VFB2BTR 7/15 202581 20041073 VFB2BWV 8/15 203698 VFB2BWV 8/15 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163612-641700-00000 0.00 101-163620-641700-00000 0,00 119-156342-641700-00000 0.00 111-138911-641700-00000 0.00 111-138911-641700-00000 0.00 001-122240-641700-00000 0.00 111-138911-641700-00000 0.00 111-138911-641700-00000 0.00 111-138911-641700-00000 0.00 001-156130-641700-00000 0.00 101-163610-641700-00000 0.00 111-138911-641700-00000 0.00 111-138911-641700-00000 0.00 111-138911-641700-00000 0.00 111-156310-641700-00000 0.00 001-172910-641150-00000 0.00 001-156363-641700-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 249,69 0,00 PAGE 8 VCHR NET 249.69 144.50 0.00 144.50 128.48 0.00 128.48 99.71 0.00 99.71 131.49 0.00 131.49 384.28 0.00 384.28 679.25 0.00 679.25 63.78 0.00 63.78 40.93 0.00 40.93 144.50 0.00 144.50 135.00 0.00 135.00 144.50 0.00 144.50 19.99 0.00 19.99 476.37 0.00 476.37 214.90 0.00 214.90 264.39 0.00 264.39 63.70 0.00 63.70 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040746 588723 VENDOR 228042 158269 SUPPLIES 460 - ALPHA CHEMICAL 001-122220-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040753 20041149 20040755 20040753 588724 VENDOR 036737 201429 SUPPLIES 035024 159781 MAINTENANCE 036625 200270 SUPPLIES 036022 201429 SUPPLIES 550 - ALPHA OMEGA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 111-138911-651210-00000 0.00 001-010510-646710-00000 0.00 113-138930-644600-00000 0.00 113-138930-651210-00000 0.00 113-138930-641950-00000 0.00 111-138911-651210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041151 589193 VENDOR 351750 - ALPHA SPECIALTIES AND AWARDS 111729 001-156363-652990-00000 157621 PLAQUE FOR PAUL MATTHEWS 0.00 CHECK NO 20040732 589204 VENDOR 354060 - AMERICAN OFFICE 4452 001-157110-644620-00000 205691 EQUIP 0.00 CHECK NO 588922 VENDOR 193950 - AMERIGAS 20041132 A5330-028960 200825 GAS 20041132 A5330-028960 200825 GAS 490-144610-643200-00000 001-061010-643200-00000 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 399.93 CHECK TOTAL 85.91 329.31 83.25 187.98 3.50 61.58 CHECK TOTAL 139.92 CHECK TOTAL 192.70 CHECK TOTAL 40.76 13.59 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~PAGE VCHR NET 9,452.64 399.93 399.93 85.91 329.31 274.73 61.58 751.53 139.92 139.92 192.70 192.70 40.76 13.59 54.35 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 588942 20041147 A5578-243013 159838 A5578-243013 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VENDOR 212040 - AMERIGAS - NAPLES 001-155410-643200-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040831 589139 VENDOR 326290 - AMY TOZIER 8/19-28 TRVL A.TOZIER 8/19-28 TRVL A.TOZIER 123-155974-640200-44600 0.00 123-155960-640200-33060 0.00 CHECK NO 20041133 20041133 589157 VENDOR 336510 - ANCHOR TREE SERVICE 8/07/02 322-183825-634999-00000 202065 LABOR 8/15/02, 322-183825-634999-00000 20265 LABOR 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303648 589267 VENDOR 900040 - ANDREA FRIEDA 02700115101 A. FRIEDA A. FRIEDA 551 BAY VILLAS LN 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303650 589268 VENDOR 900040 - ANDREW MORTENSEN 04501129303 A. MORTENSEN 408-000000-115001-00000 A. MORTENSEN 101JOHNNYCAKE DR 0.00 CHECK NO 20041015 20041015 588830 VENDOR 117070 - ANIMAL HOSPITAL OF BONITA W. MOI-F 02-9948 610-155410-631970-00000 200591 W. MOl[ 02-9948 M. GROVES 02-9860 610-155410-631970-00000 M. GROVES 02-9860 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 588969 VENDOR 233010 - ANIMALIFE VETERINARY CENTER, P.A. 423.26 CHECK TOTAL 21.75 14.21 CHECK TOTAL 18,000.00 6,000.00 CHECK TOTAL 60.68 CHECK TOTAL 52.02 CHECK TOTAL 65.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4GE VCHR NET 423.26 423.26 35.96 35,96 18,000.00 6,000.00 24.000.00 60.68 60.68 52.02 52.02 65.00 75.00 140.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041016 D. ATWELL 02-10304 200922 D. A1-FWELL COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589135 VENDOR 323350 - ANN MARIE SAYLOR 20041135 ANN MARIE REMB 408-210105-652990-00000 159287 ANN MAIRIE 0.00 CHECK NO 303638 589375 VENDOR 900050 - ANITA MARY ASHWORTH BOOK REFUND A. ASHWORTH 001-156110-347110-00000 BOOK REFUND A. ASHWORTH 0.00 CHECK NO 303649 589269 VENDOR 900040 - ANTHONY J. ADAMS 04307417501 A. Ai)AMS 408-00D000-115001-00000 A.ADAMS 1884 TIMARRON WAY 0.00 CHECK NO 20040751 589097 VENDOR 302200 - AROMA EXPRESSIONS INC 4550 495-192370-634999-00000 200360 SCENTS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041136 20041136 20041136 20041136 20041136 588865 8-30 9-30 8-30 9-30 9 1-30 9 1-30 2-3 1 HOUR 2-3 I HOUR 9-30 12 9-30 12 9-30 11-30 9-30 11-30 VENDOR 148190 - ~.RSENE MAJUSTE 681-431590-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 165.00 CHECK TOTAL 21.95 CHECK TOTAL 35.46 CHECK TOTAL 38.00 CHECK TOTAL 28.00 48.00 16.00 28.00 32.00 16J I VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 45.00 45.00 165.00 165.00 21.95 21.95 35.46 35.46 38.00 38.00 28.00 48.00 16.00 28.00 32.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041136 8-30 9-30 8-30 9-30 20041136 8-30 9 8-30 9 20041136 8-30 9-00 .5 HR 8-30 9-00 20041136 9-12 3 HR 9-12 3 HR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040752 588825 VENDOR 115320 - ASHBROOK CORPORATION 56900 408-253211-655100-00000 201775 SUPPLIES lbJ 1 CHECK NO 303655 589270 VENDOR 900040 - ASHBROOK MANOR INC. 03001758202 ASHBROOK 408-000000-115001-00000 ASHBROOK MANOR 801 97TH AVE. N PAGE CHECK NO 20041076 20040997 20041076 20041076 20041076 20041076 20040997 589134 VENDOR 323320 - AT & T 056 287 5665 001 8/15 056 287 5665 001 8/15 7305115439001 9/18 7305115439001 9/18 203293 730 511 5580 001 8/18 730 511 5580 001 0562860364001 056 286 0364 001 8/21 056 284 9101 001 9/25 056 284 9101 001 9/25 730 511 5780 001 8/21 730 511 5780 001 8/21 7305115486001 9/18 7305115486001 9/18 203293 521-122410-641400-00000 681-421510-641900-00000 470-173410-641210-00000 408-233313-643100-00000 001-156160-641900-00000 001-144210-641900-00000 681-421510-641900-00000 0.00 16.17 0.00 16.17 0.00 23.22 0.00 23.22 0.00 24.93 0.00 24.93 0.00 48.36 0.00 48.36 0.00 23.88 0.00 23.88 0.00 30.41 0.00 30.41 0.00 13.28 0.00 13.28 0.00 33.13 0,00 33.13 0.00 275.84 0.00 275.84 16.00 0.00 16.00 48.00 0.00 48.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 264.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 275.84 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 33.13 32.00 0.00 32.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 16.00 0.00 16.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041076 0562860993001 8 21 056 286 0993 001 8/21 20041076 056 284 2143 001 8/16 056 284 2143 001 8/16 20041076 058 065 8570 001 8/25 058 065 8570 001 8/25 20041076 056 286 1391 001 8/21 056 286 1391 001 8/21 CHECK NO 20041077 588972 VENDOR 236190 - AT&T 019 260 6291 001 8-18 019 260 6291 001 20041077 020 717 5083 001 8-18 020 717 5083 001 8-18 20041077 020 112 1860 001 8-16 020 112 1860 001 8-16 20041077 020 480 3933 001 8-18 020 480 3933 001 20041077 030 159 3399 001 8-15 030 159 3399 001 8-15 20041077 020 112 1860 001 8-16 020 112 1860 001 8-16 20041077 730 511 5702 001 8-21 730 511 5702 001 8-21 CHECK NO 20041070 589150 VENDOR 333620 - AT&T WIRELESS 355-10058439 8/5/02 200298 355-10058439 8/5/02 20040996 355-9000062 8/5 355-9000062 8/5 201372 20041007 355-10031926 8/5/02 355-10031926 8/5/02 200122 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 198-157430-641900-00000 0.00 495-192370-641900-00000 0.00 001-010110-641210-00000 0.00 001-144210-641900-00000 0.00 408-233352-641100-00000 0.00 001-144210-641900-00000 0.00 521-122410-641400-00000 0.00 408-233351-641100-00000 0.00 001-144510-641900-00000 0.00 521-122450-641400-00000 0.00 408-253212-641100-00000 0.00 001-010110-641700-00000 0.00 001-144210-641700-00000 0.00 490-144610-641700-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 96.25 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 96.25 159.32 0.00 159.32 28.49 0.00 28.49 21.95 0.00 21,95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 486.26 3.51 0.00 3.51 15.95 0.00 15.95 56.50 0.00 56.50 76.91 0.00 76.91 40.97 0.00 40.97 1.18 0.00 1.18 34.31 0.00 34.31 115.06 0.00 115.06 626.49 0.00 626.49 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 256.83 61.81 0.00 61.81 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041150 589183 VENDOR 349400 - AUDIO-TECH BUSINESS BOOK SUMMARIES 2831761-131 111-156349-654110-00000 159551 BUSINESS BOOKS 0.00 CHECK NO 303654 589271 VENDOR 900040 - AUGUST L. LONGO 03000386201 A.LONGO 408-000000-115001-00000 A. LONGO 680 96TH AVE N 0.00 CHECK NO 20040734 589095 VENDOR 300230 - AUTOLECTRIC 8109 200839 SUPPLIES 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040733 20040749 589069 VENDOR 286720 - AZTEK COMMUNICATIONS 2158 001-121143-634999-00000 203745 INSTALL 2207 301-120402-763100-80524 206564 INSTALL 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040944 589133 VENDOR 323310 - AZURIX NORTH AMERICA UNDERGROUND Z02-010 212523 6/11 001-122240-652994-00000 Z02-010 REPAIR 0.00 CHECK NO 20040739 20040739 20040739 588864 VENDOR 147980 - B & B TOWING 59634 200694 TOWING 60868 200694 TOWING 59728 200694 TOWING 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 149.00 CHECK TOTAL 5.02 CHECK TOTAL 165.00 CHECK TOTAL 150.00 185.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,381.22 CHECK TOTAL 35.00 35.00 86.00 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 14 VCHR NET 775.86 149.00 149.00 5.02 5.02 165.00 165.00 150.00 185.00 335.00 1.381.22 1,381.22 35.00 35.00 86.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040742 589145 VENDOR 331390 - B & B TOWING HH SERVICES INC. 3688 521-122410-646415-00000 200607 PARTS 16J CHECK NO 20040730 20040730 20040730 20040730 20040730 20040730 20040730 20040730 20040730 20040730 588725 VENDOR G32908851 206851 BOOKS B58636480 206851 BOOKS G32908850 206851 BOOKS GO15938CM 206851 BOOKS R26475900 206851 BOOKS B58269200 206851 BOOKS G32893180 206851 BOOKS G32884740 206851 BOOKS G32893181 206851 BOOKS R26475901 206851 BOOKS 1740 - BAKER & TAYLOR CO 129-156110-652670-33774 129-156110-652670-33774 129-156110-652670-33774 129-156110-652670-33774 129-156110-652670-33774 129-156110-652670-33774 129-156110-652670-33774 129-156110-652670-33774 129-156110-652670-33774 129-156110-652670-33774 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE ' 15 VCHR NET 156.00 0.00 131.00 0.00 131,00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 131.00 0.00 157.43 0.00 157.43 0.00 229.49 0.00 229,49 0.00 4.67 0.00 0.00 22.49- 0.00 CHECK NO 303652 589376 VENDOR 900050 - BARBARA WARD REF PARKS B. WARD REF PARKS B. WARD 670-000000-220010-00000 4.67 22.49- 0.00 292.12 0.00 292.12 0.00 161.81 0.00 161.81 0.00 26.61 0.00 26.61 0.00 310.27 0.00 310.27 0.00 52.36 0.00 52.36 0.00 121.38 0.00 121.38 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,333.65 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO CHECKNO 589195 VENDOR 352540 - BARRY H. AXELROD 20040837 8/23 TRVL B.AXELROD 001-121152-640300-00000 8/23 TRVL B.AXELROD AMT DISC 16J CHECK NO 20041003 20041003 588992 VENDOR 249960 - BARRY'S GRAVELY TRACTOR'S INC. 201694 521-122410-646425-00000 200693 PARTS 201600 521-122410-646425-00000 200693 PARTS AMT NET VCHR DISC 1 CHECK NO 20040995 588981 VENDOR 240380 - BAYSIDE UPHOLSTERY 382307 111-156313-646970-00000 201468 SUPPLIES PAGE CHECK NO 20040995 20040995 588901 VENDOR 173430 - BEAUMONT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 23456 495-192370-634999-00000 201986 MONITORING 25612 495-192370-634999-00000 201986 MONITORING VCHR NET 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 20041018 588962 VENDOR 229220 - BERKSHIRE VETERINARY HOSPITAL M. HAILER 02-10534 610-155410-631970-00000 M. HAILER 02-10534 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 CHECK NO 20041137 588719 VENDOR 363480 - BETTE L EVENSTAD SHELTER REQUEST 001-155930-634153-00000 AND 0.00 425.00 0.00 425.00 CHECK NO 588726 VENDOR 1820 - BETTER BUSINESS FORMS 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 705.18 0.00 705.18 0.00 299.24 0.00 299.24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 720.67 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 705.18 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 120.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 65.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 425.00 0.00 421.43 0.00 421.43 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041004 4031768 202981 BINDING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-210151-647110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588727 VENDOR 1910 - BETTER ROADS, INC. 20040611 #1 RETAINAGE 313-000000-205100-00000 206087 TO 8/9/02 RETAINAGE 20040611#1 (INVOICE 23642) 206087 TO 8/9/02 20041019 23659 206002 LOADS 0.00 313-163673-763100-60016 0.00 301-155410-763100-80096 0.00 CHECK NO 588857 20041017 J. SERGO 02-10492 200932 J. SERGO 02-10492 20041017 K. BROWN 02-10416 200932 K. BROWN 02-10416 VENDOR 141230 - BIG CYPRESS ANIMAL CLINIC 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589410 VENDOR 900080 - BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF MASSACHUSETT 303637 MB REF E. BARTON 3/29/02 490-000000-116004-00000 AMB REF E. BARTON 0217439-1 0.00 CHECK NO 588728 VENDOR 20041110 PP#25 PP #25 2270 - BOARD OF CNTY COMMISSIONERS 001-000000-217210-00000 001-000000-217220-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040741 20040741 588845 VENDOR 133300 - BOB TAYLOR CHEVROLET 123455 521-122410-646425-00000 205075 PARTS 123577 521-122410-646425-00000 205075 PARTS 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 2,308.50 CHECK TOTAL 4,194.10- 41,941.00 1,967.48 CHECK TOTAL 75. O0 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,166.00 8,591.92 CHECK TOTAL 22.64 34.39 1bi VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 17 VCHR NET 2,308.50 2,308.50 4,194.10- 41,941.00 1,967.48 39,714.38 75.00 75.00 150.00 75.00 75.00 10,757.92 10,757.92 22.64 34.39 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040741 123606 205075 PARTS DESCRIPTION 20040741 123158 205075 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588892 20041000 616349 203458 20041000 616347 203458 20041000 615625 203458 20041001 614984 203458 20041000 616171 203458 20041000 616262 203458 VENDOR 168720 - BONITA AUTO SUPPLY/NAPA PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 25.29 0.00 25.29 21.95 0.00 21.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 104.27 0.00 76.74 0.00 76.74 0.00 54.66 0.00 54.66 CHECK NO 20041148 588915 VENDOR 187560 - BOOKS ON TAPE INC. 4910099P 129-156110-652670-33774 159880 BOOKS 0.00 140.54 0.00 140.54 CHECK NO 20040998 20040744 20040998 20040998 589052 8011534 203477 PARTS 8011371 202065 PARTS 8011322 203477 PARTS 8011357 203477 PARTS VENDOR 280540 - BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION SUPPLY 111-156332-646311-00000 111-163646-646311-00000 111-156332-646311-00000 111-156332-646311-00000 0.00 17.05 0.00 17.05 0.00 39.12 0.00 39.12 0.00 28.14 0.00 28.14 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 356.25 0.00 84.00 0.00 84.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 84.00 0.00 13.07 0.00 13.07 0.00 59.54 0.00 59.54 0.00 158.54 0.00 158.54 0.00 16.90 0.00 16.90 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040998 8011323 203477 PARTS 20040998 8011088 203477 PARTS 20040999 8011371 202903 PARTS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156332-646311-00000 0.00 111-156332-646311-00000 0.00 160-162518-646311-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589081 VENDOR 293380 - BQ CONCRETE 20040729 1059 201612 CONCRETE 20040729 1058 201612 CONCRETE 20040729 1057 201612 CONCRETE 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303645 303646 589377 VENDOR 900050 - BRIGE1-FE PALMER REF B. PALMER ADOPTION 001-155410-346410-00000 REF ADOPTION B. PALMER REF B. PALMER ADOPTION 610-155410-346450-00000 REF ADOPTION B, PALMER 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 588690 VENDOR 133150 - BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF 20040718 99-3381 001-013010-649040-00000 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 303651 589272 VENDOR 900040 - BRUCE AND LYNN FRASER 04602922600 L. FRASER 408-000000-115001-00000 L. FRASER 4371 BITTERN CT 0.00 CHECK NO 589273 VENDOR 900040 - BRUNO SIWEK AMT NET 40.40 187.80 158.54 CHECK TOTAL 1,212.54 2,840.82 728. O0 CHECK TOTAL 20.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 42.00 CHECK TOTAL 9.24 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 40.40 187.80 158.54 634.79 1,212.54 2,840.82 728.00 4,781.36 20.00 30.00 50.00 42.00 42,00 9.24 9.24 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 303647 05032501401 B. SIWEK B. SIWEK 3603 EL SEGUNDO CT CHECK NO 588867 VENDOR 151240 - BSN 20041129 90966101 206672 SUPPLIES 20040743 90964480 204366 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 589088 VENDOR 295300 - BUMPER TO BUMPER 20040728 I289890 203457 PARTS 20040736 I289566 201289 PARTS 20040728 I289897 203457 PARTS 20040728 I289733 203457 PARTS 20040728 I289924 203457 PARTS 20040735 C26211 203457 PARTS 20040735 C26184 203457 PARTS 20040736 I289322 201289 PARTS 20040728 I290079 203457 PARTS 20040728 I289726 203457 PARTS 20040728 I290076 203457 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 111-156341-652990-00000 0.00 111-156332-646315-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET 7.32 CHECK TOTAL 5,983.80 453.24 CHECK TOTAL 172.91 1.19 150,11 2.84 14.50 282.20- 155.00- 28.74 51,35 27.77 24.35 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 20 VCHR NET 7.32 7.32 5,983.80 453.24 6,437.04 172.91 1.19 150.11 2.84 14.50 282.20- 155.00- 28.74 51.35 27.77 24.35 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040738 I289337 203457 PARTS 20040740 I290168 203457 PARTS 20040737 01289858 201289 PARTS 20040728 I289964 203457 PARTS 20040735 I289413 203457 PARTS 20040728 I290063 203457 PARTS 20040728 I289917 203457 PARTS 20040736 I289411 201289 PARTS 20040737 01290061 201289 PARTS 20040735 I289698 203457 PARTS 20040728 I289830 203457 PARTS 20040728 I289835 203457 PARTS 20040735 I289321 203457 PARTS 20040728 I290042 203457 PARTS 20040728 I289771 203457 PARTS 20040728 I289906 203457 PARTS 20040737 01290018 201289 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 8.07 0.00 1 'PAGE VCHR NET 8.07 18.76 0.00 18.76 9.24 0.00 9.24 25.58 0.00 25.58 213.54 0.00 213.54 62.23 0.00 62.23 14.50 0.00 14,50 138.86 0.00 138.86 300.08 0.00 300.08 7.22 0.00 7.22 29.06 0.00 29.06 193.83 0.00 193.83 151.52 0.00 151.52 17.33 0.00 17.33 5.71 0.00 5.71 40.44 0.00 40.44 20.44 0.00 20.44 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040738 20040745 20040740 20040738 20040728 20040728 20040735 20040735 20040737 20040728 20O40728 20040745 20040735 20040728 20040728 20040728 20040728 DESCRIPTION I289222 203457 PARTS I290238 203457 PARTS I290099 203457 PARTS I289398 203457 PARTS I289915 203457 PARTS I289867 203457 PARTS I289057 203457 PARTS I289221 203457 PARTS 01290058 201289 PARTS I290087 203457 PARTS I289930 203457 PARTS C26264 203457 PARTS I289704 203457 PARTS I290077 203457 PARTS I289954 203457 PARTS I289763 203457 PARTS I289759 203457 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 33..21 O. O0 1 PAGE VCHR NET 33.21 49.96 0.00 49.96 14.92 0.00 14.92 0.93 0.00 0.93 22.02 0.00 22.02 82.44 0.00 82.44 34.91 0.00 34.91 204.52 0.00 204.52 5.42 0.00 2.31 0.00 5.42 2.31 23.09 0.00 23.09 175.75- 0.00 7.01 0.00 175.75- 22 7.01 24.64 0.00 24.64 7.91 0.00 6.56 0.00 8.00 0.00 7.91 6.56 8.00 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040735 20040735 20040738 20040738 20040737 20040735 20040738 20040735 20040738 20040736 20040735 20040737 20040728 20040737 20040728 20040728 20040728 DESCRIPTION C26180 203457 PARTS C26155 203457 PARTS I289572 203457 PARTS I289301 203457 PARTS 01289970 201289 PARTS I289290 203457 PARTS I289268 203457 PARTS I289545 203457 PARTS I289385 203457 PARTS I289223 201289 PARTS I289708 203457 PARTS 01289862 201289 PARTS I289789 203457 PARTS 01289725 201289 PARTS I289928 203457 PARTS I289639 203457 PARTS I290080 203457 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 O.O0 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 230.54- 0.00 58.30- 0.00 PAGE 23 VCHR NET 230.54- 58.30- 26.07 0.00 26.07 10.50 0.00 10.50 63.19 0,00 63.19 187.27 0.00 187.27 33.81 0.00 33.81 209.72 0.00 209.72 77.68 0.00 77.68 1.45 0.00 1.45 99.15 0.00 99.15 34.79 0.00 34.79 8.00 0.00 8.00 36.19 0.00 36.19 7.44 0.00 7.44 22.31 0.00 22.31 29.28 0.00 29.28 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040737 01290054 201289 PARTS 20040738 I289567 203457 PARTS 20040740 I290097 203457 PARTS 20040736 I289568 201289 PARTS 20040735 I289642 203457 PARTS 20040737 01289706 201289 PARTS 20040728 I289946 203457 PARTS 20040735 I289702 203457 PARTS DESCRIPTION 20040735 C26221 203457 PARTS CHECK NO 588966 VENDOR 230790 - C.E.D. INC. 20040627 4977-172414 200081 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 20040580 4977-172368 201239 SUPPLIES 20040580 4977-172375 201239 SUPPLIES 20040580 4977-172366 201239 SUPPLIES 20040580 4977-172365 201239 SUPPLIES 20040580 4977-172435 201239 SUPPLIES 20040580 4977-172245 201239 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 778-182701-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-122240-652993-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 10.70 0.00 1 'PAGE 24 VCHR NET 10.70 29.04 0.00 29.04 4.10 0.00 1.83 0.00 4.10 1.83 22.32 0.00 22.32 154.27 0.00 154.27 22.02 0.00 22.02 11.52 0.00 11.52 1.67- 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 1.67- 2.457.21 80.12 0.00 80.12 39.65 0.00 39.65 5.92 0.00 5.92 40.80 0.00 40.80 112.00 0.00 112.00 207.00 0.00 207.00 43.94 0.00 43.94 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040626 4977-172916 200081 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 778-182701-652990-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 89.60 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 89.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 619.03 25 CHECK NO 588729 20040583 089110 202812 20040583 089108 202812 20040593 088393 158733 20040555 088836 159279 20040779 085436 159417 20040583 089109 202812 20040779 085975 159417 VENDOR 2860 - CAPRI I_AWN & GARDEN EQUIP 408-233351-652910-00000 SUPPLIES 408-233351-652910-00000 SUPPLIES 001-156363-652910-00000 TRACTOR CUI-TER HOUSING 495-192370-646410-00000 REPLJ~CE BI~DE 001-172930-646510-00000 SUPPLIES 408-233351-652910-00000 SUPPLIES 001-172930-652910-00000 SUPPLIES 0.00 94.92 0.00 94.92 0.00 43.75 0.00 43.75 0.00 695.00 0.00 695.00 0.00 40.05 0.00 40.05 0.00 149.47 0.00 149.47 0.00 41.69 0,00 41.69 0.00 61.34 0.00 61.34 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,126.22 CHECK NO 20040564 589224 VENDOR 360330 - CAPRI LAWN EQUIPMENT CENTER 089718 111-156313-652910-00000 157891 HEDGE TRIMMER 0.00 248.96 0.00 248.96 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 248.96 CHECK NO 303589 589274 VENDOR 900040 - CARLOS GUZMAN 03300453404 C. GUZMAN C. GUZMAN 782 101ST AVE N 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 31.46 0.00 31.46 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 31.46 CHECK NO 303618 303620 589275 VENDOR 900040 - CARLTON LAKES LLC 04530465700 CARLTON LAKES 408-000000-115001-00000 CARLTON I_AI(ES 5890 NORTHRIDGE DR. N 04531013500 C/~RLTON LAKES 408-000000-115001-00000 CARLTON I. AKES 5866 NORTHRIDGE DR N 0.00 31.50 0.00 31.50 0.00 156.41 0.00 156.41 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 303621 303622 303623 303619 DESCRIPTION 04531013600 CARLTON LAKES CARLTON LAKES 6120 MANCHESTER PL 04531014300 CARLTON LAKES CARLTON LAKES 5862 NORTHRIDGE DR. N 04532413000 CARLTON LAKES CARLTON LAKES 6196 ASHWOOD LN 04530465900 CARLTON LAKES CARLTON LAKES 5870 NORTHRIDGE DR. N COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 150.68 0.00 PA~E VCHR NET 150.68 43.03 0.00 43.03 141.43 0.00 141.43 38.22 0.00 38.22 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 561.27 26 CHECK NO 20040562 20040760 20040561 588932 943 159805 REPAIRS 8810 107583 INSTALL FENCE 892 159804 REMOVE CONSTRUCTION FENCE VENDOR 201920 - CARTER FENCE COMPANY INC. 111-156334-646317-00000 0.00 875.00 0.00 875.00 301-155410-763100-80096 0.00 111-156332-646317-00000 0.00 12.480.00 0.00 12.480.00 195.00 0.00 195.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13,550.00 CHECK NO 20040579 20040579 588829 VENDOR 117060 - CAT CARE CLINIC B RESCUE 02-10142 610-155410-631970-00000 200940 B RESCUE 02-10142 K RADDIN 02-10239 610-155410-631970-00000 200940 K RADDIN 02-10239 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 110.00 CHECK NO 303596 589260 VENDOR 900030 - CATHY RIVAS 10/18/01-4/26 TRVL RIVAS 10/18/01-4/26/02 TRVL C.RIVAS 001-156150-640200-00000 0.00 91.64 0.00 91.64 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 91.64 CHECK NO 589155 VENDOR 334310 - CDWG GOVERNMENT, INC. 20040557 GN63676 113-138930-651950-00000 113-138930-641950-00000 159263 APC BACK UPS 0.00 399.00 0.00 38.87 0.00 437.87 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040538 G001780 159213 SPLITTER COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 301-121125-651950-01017 0.00 CHECK NO 588926 20040554 13791 159183 LETTERHEAD 20040637 13790 206549 CANOE TRAIL BROCHURES 20040565 13817 201153 COPIES 20040581 13802 204815 COPIES 20040582 13812 159068 COPIES 20040637 13790 206552 ASSESMENT LETTERS VENDOR 196910 - CECIL'S COPY EXPRESS 001-121152-647110-00000 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 62.03 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 62.03 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 499.90 0.00 45.00 0,00 45.00 CHECK NO 589172 20041020 35817 205923 7/1-31/02 20040969 35372 201739 5/1-31/02 320-183805-647110-00000 0.00 001-172910-647110-00000 0.00 001-000000-142900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303592 109-182601-647110-00000 0.00 109-182900-647110-00000 0.00 2,950.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040576 109-182601-647110-00000 0.00 109-182900-647110-00000 0.00 0.00 VENDOR 345040 - CEDAR ENTERPRISE SOLUTION. INC. 301-121125-654370-01017 301-121125-649010-01017 0.00 301-121125-640310-01017 0.00 2,950.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 116.00 116.00 0.00 938.00 938.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0,00 54.464.63 0.00 0.00 26,068.20 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.268.00 0.00 589378 VENDOR 900050 - CELINE EMERSON REF PARKS C. EMERSON 130-157710-347290-00000 REF PARKS C. EMERSON 589166 VENDOR 343050 - CENTRAL FLORIDA MULCHES 3640 111-156332-646318-00000 206116 SUPPLIES 0.00 232.00 1,876.00 5,223.00 54.464.63 26.068.20 80.532.83 8.00 8.00 2.268.00 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040787 589191 VENDOR 350880 - CHALMERS & KUBECK - SOUTH 1002267-01 408-253221-634999-00000 204142 PARTS 16J 1 CHECK NO 20040559 20040558 588916 VENDOR 188280 - CHANNEL INNOVATIONS CORP. TESTING SVS 8/9/02 146-144380-634999-00000 159419 8/9 TESTING 14702 146-144380-652990-00000 159698 SUPPLIES AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE CHECK NO 303591 589411 VENDOR 900080 - CHARLES ROUSER AMB REF C. ROUSER 1/9/02 490-000000-116004-00000 AMB REF C. ROUSER 0208751-1 VCHR NET 2,268.00 CHECK NO 20040578 589159 VENDOR 337310 - CHARLIE HICKS B-BALL 8/24/02 205491 8/24 BBALL 130-157710-634999-00000 0.00 540.00 0.00 540.00 CHECK NO 20040577 20040542 20040543 588847 VENDOR 133880 - CHECKPOINT CHP4941 9/02 200849 9/02 4617/203369 158344 MONITORING 1273404/203124 159609 MONITORING 521-122410-634999-00000 470-173435-634999-00000 001-156110-634999-00000 0.00 24.95 0.00 24.95 0.00 297.00 0.00 297.00 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 CHECK NO 20040556 588883 VENDOR 165950 - CHECKPOINT. LTD. MUSEU/17083 198-157410-634999-00000 158702 UPGRADE SECURITY 0.00 199.00 0.00 199.00 0.00 14.66 0.00 14.66 0.00 259.70 0.00 259.70 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 634.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14.66 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 540.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 339.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 557.95 0.00 557.95 0.00 557.95 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040638 588920 VENDOR 193460 00152481 202567 SUPPLIES CHEMICAL LIME COMPANY 408-253211-652310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040788 589182 VENDOR 348740 CHILD CARE OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA,INC IOHR CLASS DYE,HIRST,RIV 111-156390-654360-00000 159732 CLASS DYE HIRST RIVERSON 0.00 CHECK NO 20040834 589125 VENDOR 320880 8/1-30 TRVL C.OBERG 8/1-30 TRVL C.OBERG CHRIS OBERG 111-156310-640200-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303590 589276 VENDOR 900040 03600309000 C. HELSE C. HELSE 03600309000 CHRISTIAN HELSE 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040552 588918 VENDOR 192400 320502630260 8/27 159539 DIGITAL CAMERA CIRCUIT CITY 111-156395-764370-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040614 20040614 20040614 588965 VENDOR 230780 CITY OF CAPE CORAL 1259 111-156343-634999-00000 206214 SUMMER CAMP FIRLD TRIP 1260 206214 SUMMER CAMP FIRLD TRIP 1259 206214 SUMMER CAMP FIRLD TRIP 111-156380-634999-00000 111-156381-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J PAGE 29 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 VCHR NET 199.00 3,047.25 0.00 3,047.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,047.25 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 20.88 0.00 20.88 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.88 42.94 0.00 42.94 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.94 839.98 0.00 839.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 839.98 208.25 0.00 208.25 119.00 0.00 119.00 714.00 0.00 714.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,041.25 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC AMT NET CHECK NO 588730 VENDOR 3390 CITY OF NAPLES 20040625 10965-408954/10963-46046 10965-408954/10963-46046 001-000000-155900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589171 VENDOR 344750 20040785 8:11:30 3 1/2 HRS 8-11:30 3 1/2 CLARA E BERON 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588819 VENDOR 111750 20040541 3408 159035 PLANTS CLARK'S NURSERY 001-156363-646320-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589090 20041099 PP~25 PP~25 VENDOR 296230 CLERK OF COURTS - HIGHLAND COUNTY 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588698 VENDOR 166520 20040770 J. RICHARDSON 02-2118 AND CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 331-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 588700 VENDOR 166520 20040772 M. COMBS 02-2135 AND CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 331-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 588703 VENDOR 166520 20040775 A. LAMBERT 02-2132 AND CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 331-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 588702 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 1,325.08 CHECK TOTAL 56.00 CHECK TOTAL 438.00 CHECK TOTAL 177.62 CHECK TOTAL 82,700.00 CHECK TOTAL 15,500.00 CHECK TOTAL 26.100.00 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 30 VCHR NET 1,325.08 1,325.08 56.00 56. O0 438.00 438.00 177.62 177.62 82,700.00 82,700.00 15,500.00 15,500.00 26,100.00 26,100.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040774 EFRAIN ARCE 02-2119 AND COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 331-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 20040771 588699 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK M. ALVAREZ 02-1282 331-163650-761100-60018 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20040773 588701 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK T. GONZALEZ 02-2159 331-163650-761100-60018 313-163673-761100-60018 AND 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040776 588704 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK CENTEX HOMES 02-1602 334-163650-761100-60134 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20040612 588693 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK COLLIER DEV CORP 02-1480 334-163650-761100-60134 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20040778 588706 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK TIBURON GOLF 02-1909 313-163673-761100-62071 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20040613 588694 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK PELICAN MARSH 02-1694 334-163650-761100-60134 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 588695 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 38,000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 22,100.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16,000.00 82,900.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25,700.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25,700.00 O.O0 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 31 VCHR NET 38,000.00 38.000.00 22,100.00 22,100.00 98,900.00 98.900.00 25,700.00 25,700.00 2,000. O0 2,000.00 25,700.00 25,700.00 2.500.00 2,500.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040767 FIRST BAPTIST CH. 02-0221 AND COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 313-163673-761100-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 20040769 588697 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 5TH AVE 02-1766 313-163673-761100-62071 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20040768 588696 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK ORCHARDS COMM 02-1635 331-163650-761100-60018 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20040777 588705 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK G4 PARTNER 02-1741 334-163650-761100-60134 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20040539 20040551 589210 VENDOR 356800 - CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA 1003 111-156395-654360-00000 159537 HEARTSAVE CARD FEES 1002 111-156313-652720-00000 157889 HEARTSAVER FACTS TOOL KIT 16J 1 CHECK NO 303582 589277 VENDOR 900040 - CLYDE C. QUINBY TR 05827401600 C. QUINBY 408-000000-115001-00000 C. QUINBY 3716 BUTTONWOOD WAY PAGE CHECK NO 20040588 588731 VENDOR 3571 JULY 02 3571 JULY 02 3570 - COASTAL COURIER 001-061010-643400-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 627,300.00 0.00 627,300.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,790,400.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 78,200.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 408,500.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 627,300.00 1,790,400.00 1,790,400.00 78.200.00 78.200.00 408,500,00 408,500.00 0,00 295.00 0.00 295.00 0.00 470.00 0.00 470.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 765.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 12. O0 0.00 66.00 0.00 66.00 32 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 66.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 589278 VENDOR 900040 - COASTAL PLASTERING INC 303617 04900653001 COASTAL COASTAL 5780 HOUCHIN ST 408-000000-115001-00000 CHECK NO 589245 20040621 1065 207056 STAFFING SVS 20040621 1156 207056 STAFFING SVS 20040621 1135 207056 STAFFING SVS VENDOR 362780 - COASTAL STAFFING SERVICE, INC. 001-121110-634999-00000 001-121110-634999-00000 001-121110-634999-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1 PAGE CHECK NO 589218 20040575 25072 206263 SURVEY 20040766 25063 206465 SUPPLIES 20040766 25098 206465 SUPPLIES VENDOR 359320 - COLEMAN TECHNOLOGIES. INC. 001-138710-634999-00000 101-163624-764900-00000 101-163624-764900-00000 VCHR NET 0.00 50.69 0.00 50.69 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.69 CHECK NO 589190 20041107 PP #25 PP #25 VENDOR 350590 - COLLECTION SERVICES CENTER 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 345.60 0.00 345.60 CHECK NO 303581 589379 VENDOR 900050 - COLLIER COUNTY BAIL BONDS 02-2134 MMMA 001-431510-351100-00000 C.C. BAIL BONDS C/O LANDON MILLERESQ 0.00 204.80 0.00 204.80 CHECK NO 588732 VENDOR 3650 - COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20040640 #47 001-156363-634999-00000 0.00 512.00 O.O0 512.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,300.00 0.00 3,577.92 0.00 22,538.60 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,062.40 1,300.00 3,577.92 22,538.60 27,416.52 0.00 316.24 0.00 316.24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 316.24 1,250.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 426.44 0.00 0.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 33 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 204799 TRANSPORTATION 20010640 204801 TRANSPORTATION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156343-634999-00000 0.00 111-156390-634999-00000 0.00 111-156381-634999-00000 0.00 111-156425-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040715 588689 VENDOR 130700 - COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT 99-3561 001-013010-649040-00000 AND 16J I CHECK NO 20040714 588688 VENDOR 130700 - COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT 99-3790 001-013010-649040-00000 AND AMT NET VCHR DISC 1,500.00 800.00 485.77 0.00 CHECK NO 20040887 588733 VENDOR TD 11407-09 TD 11407-09 3680 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 001-321110-369200-00000 PAGE CHECK NO 20040590 588686 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR ~20020141 TAGS & TITLE 521-122410-649010-00000 AND VCHR NET 3,212.21 CHECK NO 20040622 20040622 20040622 20040622 588734 VENDOR 0780184410057/23-8/23 07801844100 7/23-8/23 05418830500 7/11-8/12 05418830500 7/11-8/12 07806012500 7/25-8/22 07806012500 7/25-8/22 07809800300 7/25-8/22 07809800300 7/25-8/22 3690 - COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY BILLING 408-253211-643400-00000 001-155410-643400-00000 408-233351-643400-00000 408-233351-643400-00000 207.73 0.00 207.73 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,419.94 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 160.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 160.00 0.00 1,685.13 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,685.13 1,685.13 0.00 52.85 0.00 52.85 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 52.85 0.00 73.55 0.00 73.55 0.00 714.48 0.00 714.48 0.00 26.40 0.00 26.40 0.00 26.40 0.00 26.40 34 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040786 07501887900 7/23-8/21 07501887900 7/23-8/21 20040622 07511796700 7/23-8/21 07511796700 7/23-8/21 20040622 07801284200 6/25-7/24 07801284200 6/25-7/24 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156180-643400-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 144-144360-643400-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040592 588852 VENDOR 137550 - COLLIER FENCE AND WIRE. INC. 1987 109-182901-652990-00000 206226 CHAIN LINK FENCE 0.00 CHECK NO 20040569 588736 VENDOR 4120 - COLLIER SPORTS OFC ASSOC SOFTBALL 8/17-18/02 111-156341-634999-00000 202059 SOFTBALL 8/17-18/02 0.00 CHECK NO 20040624 20040624 20040624 20040624 20040624 20040624 20040624 588961 002341 200623 SUPPLIES 002373 200623 SUPPLIES 002278 200623 SUPPLIES 002279 200623 SUPPLIES 00221 200623 SUPPLIES 002177 200623 SUPPLIES 002263 200623 SUPPLIES VENDOR 227020 - COLLIER TIRE & AUTO REPAIR 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 ~ NET 487.09 481.08 36.48 CHECK TOTAL 693.00 CHECK TOTAL 870.00 CHECK TOTAL 215.07 302.00 52.14 29.70 29.70 380.88 1,005.13 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 487.09 481.08 36.48 1,845.48 693.00 693.00 870.00 870.00 215.07 302.00 52.14 29.70 29.70 380.88 1,005.13 35 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.014.62 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040819 20040570 20040819 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 589229 VENDOR 360920 - COLLIER TIRE COMMERCIAL CENTER 2303 206491 SUPPLIES 002315 206491 PARTS 2318 206491 SUPPLIES AMT DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040623 20040623 589014 VENDOR 260030 - COLOR WHEEL PAINT 117043406 201990 PAINT 111-156332-646313-00000 117043407 201990 PAINT 111-156332-646313-00000 0,00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040961 589244 VENDOR 362760 - COMMERCE TITLE & GWEN BELLAMY D/P G. BELLAMY63825001700 191-138785-884100-44200 63825001700 D/P G. BELLAMY 207027 0.00 CHECK NO 20040544 588994 VENDOR 250460 - COMMERCIAL AIR MANAGEMENT, INC. 6015 001-122240-652996-00000 158231 CURB ADAPTOR 0.00 CHECK NO 20040762 20040761 20040619 20040764 588824 996537 203679 LABOR 996536 203680 MOWING AND EDGING 995980 203681 REPAIRS 996523 200846 TRIM TREES VENDOR 115280 - COMMERCIAL LAND MAINTENANCE 136-162590-634999-00000 136-162590-634999-00000 136-162590-634999-00000 150-162545-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 117.00 71.50 63.00 CHECK TOTAL 655.50 437.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,500.00 CHECK TOTAL 152.75 CHECK TOTAL 4.162.00 354.00 1.638.50 8,345.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 117.00 71.50 63.00 251.50 655.50 437.00 1,092.50 2,500.00 2.500.00 152.75 152.75 4.162.00 354.00 1.638.50 8,345.00 36 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040618 996512 202160 LABOR 20040761 996525 203680 MOWING AND EDGING 20040885 996272 202160 LABOR 20040616 996470 203678 REPAIRS 20040586 996398 200833 REPAIRS 20040616 996433 203678 REPAIRS 20040620 996407 206500 MULCH 20040763 996534 203676 LABOR 20040587 996397 203678 REPAIRS 20040616 996432 203678 REPAIRS 20040761 996514 203680 MOWING AND EDGING 20040885 995690 202160 LABOR 20040765 996524 200838 ROAD SVC 20040762 996515 203679 LABOR 20040763 996513 203676 LABOR 20040758 996494 200446 REPAIRS 20040618 996533 202160 LABOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 155-112593-634999-00000 0.00 136-162590-634999-00000 0.00 155-112593-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 136-162590-634999-00000 0.00 155-112593-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 136-162590-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 155-112593-634999-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 563.64 0.00 5,035.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 563.64 5,035.00 563.64 0.00 563.64 71.85 0.00 71.85 147.97 0.00 147.97 187.00 0.00 187.00 1,710.00 0.00 19,142.00 0.00 1,710. O0 19,142.00 294.00 0.00 294.00 1,196.00 0.00 1,196.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 3,372. O0 O. O0 5,450.00 0.00 4,162.00 0.00 21,050.00 0.00 3.372.00 5,450.00 4,162. O0 21,050.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 563.64 0.00 563.64 37 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040885 996106 202160 20040761 996541 203680 20040586 996438 200833 20040616 996530 203678 20040585 996404 202356 20040616 996488 203678 20040566 996475 200850 20040587 996314 203678 20040563 996505 159856 20040587 996455 203678 20040587 996423 203678 DESCRIPTION LABOR MOWING AND EDGING REPAIRS REPAIRS REPAIRS REPAIRS REPAIRS REPAIRS BLUEPRINTS/FOREST LAKES REPAIRS REPAIRS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 155-112593-634999-00000 0.00 136-162590-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 160-162518-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 150-162545-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 155-112593-647110-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303616 589279 VENDOR 900040 - COMMERCIAL PROP SW INC 08027511300 COMMERCIAL 408-000000-115001-00000 COMMERCIAL 7097 PEACH BLOSSOM CT 0.00 CHECK NO 20040545 589018 VENDOR 263070 - COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 435664 001-122240-646610-00000 158202 ANTENNA 0.00 CHECK NO 588939 VENDOR 209680 - COMPASS MICROFILM SERVICES INC. AMT NET 563.64 4,487.00 105.21 1.710.00 42.00 124.00 219.00 273.00 18.62 126.00 66.87 CHECK TOTAL 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 30.00 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P)m~GE VCHR NET 563.64 4,487.00 105.21 1,710.00 42.00 124.00 219.00 273. O0 18.62 126.00 66.87 86,181.58 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 38 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040783 10037 159878 FILM COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 129-156110-652690-33774 0.00 CHECK NO 20040553 588835 VENDOR 123580 - CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. INC. 4977-84078 001-122240-652993-00000 158270 PARTS 0.00 CHECK NO 20040574 20040540 20040759 589055 211045 206141 SVS ORDER 211041 157957 DESIGN BACKUP BOOSTER STA 211044 205907 SVS ORDER VENDOR 281620 - CONSOLIDATED POWER SERVICES. INC. 408-253221-634999-00000 412-273511-634999-70124 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303588 589280 VENDOR 900040 - CONSTANTINE 04729860000 C. RIGAS C. RIGAS 1292 BARRIGANA CT. RIGAS TR. 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303584 303587 303583 303585 303586 589281 04729793200 C. RIGAS C. RIGAS 2151KHASIA PT 04728329700 C. RIGAS C. RIGAS 2330 BU1-FERFLY PALM DR. 04729839400 C. RIGAS C. RIGAS 1397ARECA COVE 04729610300 C. RIGAS C. RIGAS 1418 KING SAGO CT 04729484900 C. RIGAS C. RIGAS 2171 KHASIA PT VENDOR 900040 - CONSTANTINE RIGAS TR 408-000000-115001-00000 408-000000-115001-00000 408-000000-115001-00000 408-000000-115001-00000 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~uMT NET 70.95 CHECK TOTAL 538.70 CHECK TOTAL 2,205.83 700.00 5,693.65 CHECK TOTAL 44.44 CHECK TOTAL 33.76 12.70 27.34 22.06 27.22 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 ~GE 39 VCHR NET 70.95 70.95 538.70 538.70 2,205.83 700.00 5,693.65 8,599.48 44.44 44.44 33.76 12.70 27.34 22.06 27.22 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 123.08 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 588735 20040546 45716A VENDOR 159427 TONER DESCRIPTION 3800 - COPY CONCEPTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163609-652990-00000 0.00 313-163611-652990-00000 0.00 101-163609-641950-00000 0.00 313-163611-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040782 20040797 588964 VENDOR 230460 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 35360350 001-122240-652990-00000 158926 SUPPLIES 35278648 101-163610-651110-00000 203459 SUPPLIES AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 20038154 20040791 20040820 20040757 20040757 20040791 20040804 20040799 20040757 20040886 589045 34559342 203539 SUPPLIES 35329609 203778 SUPPLIES 38164744001 PD TWICE 203781 PD TWICE 34841974 203434 SUPPLIES 35175517 203434 SUPPLIES 35543388 203778 SUPPLIES 35239445 203326 SUPPLIES 35057945 203440 SUPPLIES 35550493 203434 SUPPLIES 35057964 203539 SUPPLIES VENDOR 276650 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 001-156180-651110-00000 001-100110-651110-00000 111-156332-651110-00000 001-010510-651110-00000 001-010510-651110-00000 001-100110-651110-00000 408-253211-651110-00000 408-233351-651110-00000 001-010510-651110-00000 001-156145-651110-00000 25.47 25.48 2.25 2.25 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 Ii~PAGE 40 VCHR NET 55.45 55.45 0.00 54.84 0.00 54.84 0.00 4.07 0.00 4.07 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 58.91 0.00 115.42 0.00 115.42 0.00 33.31 0.00 33.31 113.88- 0.00 0.00 113.88- 0.00 390.11 0.00 390.11 0.00 5.04 0.00 0.00 19.00- 0.00 5.04 19.00- 0.00 70.54 0.00 70.54 0.00 3.18 0.00 3.18 0.00 140.80 0.00 140.80 0.00 134.76 0.00 134.76 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040757 DESCRIPTION 34738260 203434 SUPPLIES 20040801 35360358 203347 SUPPLIESSS 20040817 35390611 203291 SUPPLIES 20039054 34803036 203781 SUPPLIES 20040801 348029993 203347 SUPPLIESSS 20040886 35206055 203539 SUPPLIES 20038154 34555835 203539 SUPPLIES 20038154 34730231 203539 SUPPLIES 20040810 34889541 203298 SUPPLIES 20038154 34659125 203539 SUPPLIES 20040886 35057964 203539 SUPPLIES 20040757 34623614 203434 SUPPLIES 20040757 35058325 203434 SUPPLIES 20040810 35278897 203298 SUPPLIES 20040757 35094280 203434 SUPPLIES 20040886 35058349 203539 SUPPLIES 20038154 34555835 203539 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-010510-651110-00000 0.00 113-138930-651110-00000 0.00 408-233312-651110-00000 0.00 111-156332-651110-00000 0.00 113-138930-651110-00000 0.00 001-156150-651110-00000 0.00 001-156145-651110-00000 0.00 001-156110-651110-00000 0.00 101-163612-651110-00000 0.00 001-156110-651110-00000 0.00 001-156150-651110-00000 0.00 001-010510-651110-00000 0.00 001-010510-651110-00000 0.00 101-163612-651110-00000 0.00 001-010510-651110-00000 0.00 001-156175-651110-00000 0.00 001-156140-651110-00000 0.00 AMT NET 69.74 36.44 113.64 93.32 111.24 50.00 50.00 59.47- 90.15 59.44 140.80 325.52 36.72 47.98 4.08- 7,043.40 7.20 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 JJAGE 41 VCHR NET 69.74 36.44 113.64 93.32 111.24 50.00 50.00 59.47- 90.15 59.44 140.80 325.52 36.72 47.98 4.08- 7,043.40 7.20 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20038154 34659125 203539 SUPPLIES 20040781 34949258 159743 FILE CABINET 20040793 35384093 203616 SUPPLIES 20038154 34730234 203539 SUPPLIES 20040802 35278852 203344 SUPPLIES 20038154 34555835 203539 SUPPLIES 20040886 35206055 203539 SUPPLIES 20038154 345919131 203539 SUPPLIES 20040791 352278846 203778 SUPPLIES 20040799 35171140 203440 SUPPLIES 20040804 35360258 203326 SUPPLIES 20040801 35390284 203347 SUPPLIESSS 20040886 35206055 203539 SUPPLIES 20040800 35329597 203358 SUPPLIES 20038154 34555835 203539 SUPPLIES 20038154 34555835 203539 SUPPLIES 20040795 35321096 203577 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156175-651110-00000 0.00 101-163624-652990-00000 0.00 001-100130-651110-00000 0.00 001-156175-651110-00000 0.00 408-210155-651110-00000 0.00 001-156145-651110-00000 0.00 001-156180-651110-00000 0.00 001-156175-651110-00000 0.00 001-100110-651110-00000 0.00 408-233351-651110-00000 0.00 408-253211-651110-00000 0.00 113-138930-651110-00000 0.00 001-156175-651110-00000 0.00 521-122410-651110-00000 0.00 001-156180-651110-00000 0.00 001-156110-651110-00000 0.00 111-156395-651110-00000 0.00 AMT NET 100.00 445.50 41.00- 29.70- 1.89 75.00 60.00 25.00 19.00 219.55 2.52 19.98 75.00 37.41 100.00 75.00 87.57- VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 !PAGE VCHR NET 100.00 445.50 41.00- 29.70- 1.89 75.00 60.00 25.00 19.00 219.55 2.52 19.98 75.00 37.41 100.00 42 75.00 87.57- SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040805 35239460 203319 SUPPLIES 20040809 35516860 203309 SUPPLIES 20040886 35206055 203539 SUPPLIES 20040790 35390286 204310 SUPPLIESSS 20040802 35234331 203344 SUPPLIES 20040798 35144969 203438 SUPPLIES 20040806 35278901 203322 SUPPLIES 20038154 34555835 203539 SUPPLIES 20040757 34889534 203434 SUPPLIES 20040757 34951409 203434 SUPPLIES 20040886 35278838 203539 SUPPLIES 20040816 35360362 203288 SUPPLIES 20040800 35360363 203358 SUPPLIES 20038154 34559342 203539 SUPPLIES 20038154 34555835 203539 SUPPLIES 20040886 35388785 203539 SUPPLIES 20040801 35360312 203347 SUPPLIESSS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 116-121830-651110-33297 0.00 001-122240-651110-00000 0.00 001-156130-651110-00000 0,00 516-121650-651110-00000 0.00 408-210155-651110-00000 0.00 130-157710-651110-00000 0.00 408-253212-651110-00000 0.00 001-156160-651110-00000 0.00 001-010510-651110-00000 0.00 001-010510-651110-00000 0.00 001-156175-651110-00000 0.00 408-210105-651110-00000 0.00 521-122410-651110-00000 0.00 001-156160-651110-00000 0.00 001-156175-651110-00000 0.00 001-156175-651110-00000 0.00 113-138930-651110-00000 0.00 AMT NET 53.75 61.36 40.00 76.06 208.74- 67.51 562.43 100.00 6.72 8.39 79.26 94.18 3.31 100.00 410.00 6,871.68- 275.53 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 J PAGE 43 VCHR NET 53.75 61.36 40.00 76.06 208.74- 67.51 562.43 100.00 6.72 8.39 79.26 94.18 3.31 100.00 410.00 6,871.68- 275.53 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER . DESCRIPTION 20040800 35360279 203358 SUPPLIES 20040792 35173712 203696 SUPPLIES 20040886 35206055 203539 SUPPLIES 20040757 35239479 203434 SUPPLIES 20040757 35390303 203434 SUPPLIES 20040886 35057964 203539 SUPPLIES 20040757 331B1841 203434 SUPPLIES 20038154 34591931 203539 SUPPLIES 20040808 35360280 203309 SUPPLIES 20040800 35329622 203358 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-651110-00000 0,00 111-156349-651110-00000 0.00 001-156170-651110-00000 0.00 001-010510-651110-00000 0.00 001-010510-651110-00000 0.00 001-156160-651110-00000 0.00 001-010510-651110-00000 0.00 001-156110,651110-00000 0.00 001-122240-651110-00000 0.00 521-122410-651110-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 48.99 0.00 1 PAGE 44 VCHR NET 48.99 60.94 0.00 60.94 245.76 0.00 245.76 113.99 0.00 113.99 235.71 0.00 235.71 140.80 0.00 140.80 226.57 0.00 226.57 25.75 0.00 25.75 16.56 0.00 16.56 210.23 0.00 210.23 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,253.28 CHECK NO 20040796 589164 VENDOR 342490 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 35278902 198-157410-651110-00000 203526 SUPPLIES 0,00 118.04 0.00 118.04 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 118.04 CHECK NO 20040789 589176 VENDOR 347750 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 51037612001 001-432040-651110-00000 204870 SUPPLIES 0.00 22.51 0.00 22.51 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 22.51 CHECK NO 20040568 589101 VENDOR 308630 - CREEL TRACTOR, CO. 187794 521-122410-646425-00000 200854 PARTS 0.00 69.08 0.00 69.08 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040584 20040584 588956 VENDOR 222430 - CROSSROADS VETERINARY CLINIC J HINES 02-10454 200971 J HINES 02-10454 610-155410-631970-00000 D ASHCROFT 02-10258 200971 D ASHCROFT 02-10258 610-155410-631970-00000 16J AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 20040567 588853 VENDOR 137570 - CROWTHER ROOFING AND SHEET METAL F30086 001-122240-639962-00000 201505 ROOFING REPAIRS VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20040811 20040815 20040560 20040813 20040814 20040812 588737 VENDOR 828111 8/26 200469 BO1-FLED WATER 8/26 814541 8/26 201808 BOTTLED WATER 8/26 933630 8/26/02 159765 WATER 907782 8/26 200857 BOTTLED WATER 8/26 767319 5/25 201606 BOTTLED WATER 5/25 875997 8/26 201163 BO1-FLED WATER 8/26 4400 - CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 001-172930-652990-00000 001-122310-652990-00000 001-100130-649990-00000 101-163612-652990-00000 001-157110-652990-00000 001-172910-652990-00000 PAGE 45 VCHR NET 69.08 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 130.00 0.00 519.43 0.00 519.43 CHECK NO 20040589 20040589 20040571 588806 8047005 203770 PARTS/CREDIT 08046920 203770 PARTS/CREDIT 08046793 203770 PARTS VENDOR 102870 - CUMMINS SOUTHEASTERN POWER, INC. 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 519.43 0.00 23.76 0.00 23.76 0.00 14.85 0.00 14.85 0.00 17.82 0.00 17.82 0.00 47.52 0,00 47.52 0.00 8.67 0.00 8.67 0.00 50.49 0.00 50.49 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16.64- 0.00 163.11 16,64- 0.00 19.82 0.00 19.82 0.00 19.82 0,00 19.82 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040639 20040639 20040639 20040639 20040639 589048 280966 202099 WATER TREATMENT 30191 202099 WATER TREATMENT 30218 202099 WATER TREATMENT 30243 202099 WATER TREATMENT 280917 202099 WATER TREATMENT VENDOR 278120 - CUSTOM WATER SYSTEMS 001-122240-646284-00000 0.00 001-122240-646284-00000 0.00 001-122240-646284-00000 0.00 001-122240-646284-00000 0.00 001-122240-646284-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040361 589023 VENDOR 265700 - DAI)E PAPER COMPANY 739120 408-253211-652510-00000 200382 SUPPL. 0.00 CHECK NO 20040370 589205 VENDOR 354820 - DAN'S YARD AND TI~ACTOR 164309 111-138911-634804-00000 2002070879 0.00 CHECK NO 303636 589380 VENDOR 900050 - DAWA WILLIAMS REF.PARKS D WILLIAMS REF.PARKS D WILLIAMS 111-156395-347290-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041179 589259 VENDOR 363510 - DANIEL NEJA INTERV TRVL REIMB-8/8/02 160062 - INTERV TRVL REIMB 8/8 194-101540-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589239 VENDOR 362510 - DANIELLE ROSEN AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 234.95 662.60 1.580.90 637.60 560.00 CHECK TOTAL 52.50 CHECK TOTAL 55.00 CHECK TOTAL 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 742.30 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 P~GE 46 VCHR NET 23.00 234.95 662.60 1,580.90 637.60 560.00 3,676.05 52.50 52.50 55.00 55.00 150.00 150.00 742.30 742.30 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040461 000100 159375 SAILBOAT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156332-764400-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303542 589282 VENDOR 900040 DARLA EWERT LAMBERSON REF.LAMBERSON06302482400 408-000000-115001-00000 REF,D LAMBERSON 3339 BASIN ST 0.00 CHECK NO 589122 VENDOR 319000 20040382 96 159090 COCONUT TREES DAVE WEST 408-253212-646314-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588717 VENDOR 362240 20040897 E.NERIO 9/02 #4583 AND DAVENPORT MOBILE HOME PARK 001-155930-634153-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589146 VENDOR 332320 20040393 98418 159078 INS.CERT. DAVID H PAUL INC 408-253211-654360-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589283 VENDOR 900040 DAVID HYATT 303548 REF.D HYATT05502427701 REF.D HYATT 4604 PARROT AVE 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588854 VENDOR 138670 20040830 8/19-29 TRVL D.MAXON 8/19-29 TRVL D.MAXON DEBBI MAXON 123-155972-640200-34640 123-155974-640200-44600 123-155960-640200-33060 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589071 VENDOR 287200 - DENIS DIPERT AMT NET 900.00 CHECK TOTAL 73.04 CHECK TOTAL 33.00 CHECK TOTAL 200.00 CHECK TOTAL 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 27.51 CHECK TOTAL 5.45 8.18 13.63 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 900.00 900.00 73.04 73.04 33.00 33.00 200.00 200.00 250.00 250,00 27.51 27.51 27.26 27.26 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040838 8/3-29 TRVL D.DIPERT 8/3-29 TRVL D.DIPERT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156313-640200-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589206 VENDOR 355770 20041028 8/3-8/9/02 205295 SOCCER DENISE YAKIMO 111-156380-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589253 VENDOR 363050 20040368 CTY V.C.MCDONALD 159835 SUMMONS DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL PROCESS 516-121650-631990-00000 16J' CHECK NO 303541 589284 VENDOR 900040 DIETER GRUETZNER REF.GRUETZNER05801164202 408-000000-115001-00000 REF.D GRUETZNER 4256 LAKEWOOD CHECK NO 20041142 588858 VENDOR 141790 IV054450 202542 VALVES DILLER & BROWN 408-233352-652910-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 42.92 0.00 CHECK NO 20041033 589174 VENDOR 345930 0012-021872622 202905 MONTHLY CHARGES DIRECT TV 490-144610-634999-00000 PAG~ CHECK NO 20040383 20040384 589170 VENDOR 343980 166008 159283 CARRY CASE 166005 159282 BAI-TERY&TRVL CHARG. DIRECT WIRELESS 001-121152-641700-00000 001-121148-641700-00000 VCHR NET 42.92 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.92 390.00 0.00 390.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 390.00 0.00 22.00 0.00 22.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 22.00 0.00 62.48 0.00 62.48 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 62.48 0.00 1,839.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,839.00 1,839.00 0.00 64.99 0.00 64.99 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 64.99 0.00 18.74 0.00 18.74 0.00 107.97 0.00 107.97 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 126.71 48 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20041009 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 589252 VENDOR 363040 - DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF 9502 346-116360-763100-00181 207089 UPGPJ~DE REC FIELDS AMT DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20040689 588884 VENDOR 165960 - DISTRICT IWENTY 15TH PYMT 001-144710-634108-00000 001-144710-645300-00000 200316 15TH PYMT 16J CHECK NO 20041145 589219 VENDOR 359610 - DIVERSIFIED DRILLING S-15342 408-253212-634999-00000 206583 MAINT.OF WELLS AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 20040459 588909 VENDOR 180260 - DIXIE TRUCKING, INC. 70473 001-156363-646381-00000 158910 TIGERTAIL 389,794.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040385 588817 VENDOR 111440 - DOLPH MAP CO. INC. 1247 001-155110-652990-00000 159508 MAP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 302780 589381 VENDOR 900050 - DOLPHIN COVE OF GOODLAND INC REF 115903 DOLPHIN COVE 336-163650-363630-00000 REF 115903 DOLPHIN COVE 0.00 28,475.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040392 588738 VENDOR 5270 - DOMESTIC CUSTOM METALS 11823 001-122240-649990-00000 158207 SECURITY HASPS 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 24,373.14 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 I~AGE VCHR NET 389,794.00 389,794.00 28,475.00 28,475.00 24,373.14 24,373.14 0.00 355.00 0.00 355.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 355.00 0.00 147.00 0.00 147.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 147.00 37,400.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 37,400.00 37,400.00 0.00 285.00 0.00 285.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 285.00 '49 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 588807 VENDOR 104885 - DON HUNTER. SHERIFF 20040662 AUG-02 CLAIM 8 JULY.2002 CLAIM 8 199-611040-512100-00000 199-611040-514100-00000 199-611040-521100-00000 199-611040-522100-00000 199-611040-523150-00000 199-611040-524100-00000 199-611040-640380-00000 199-611040-641100-00000 199-611040-652910-00000 199-611040-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20040662 AUG-02 CLAIM 8 JULY.2002 CLAIM 8 199-611040-654360-00000 199-611040-764210-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040829 588890 VENDOR 167380 - DON JEFFERY 8/6-9/3 TRVL D.JEFFERY 8/6-9/3 TRVL D.JEFFERY 111-156381-640200-00000 16J 1 CHECK NO 589412 VENDOR 900080 - DOROTHY M.WATTS 303446 AMB.REF.D WATTS 4/12/02 490-000000-116004-00000 AMB.REF.D WATTS 0218921-1 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 303551 589285 VENDOR 900040 - DOUGLAS FRENCH REF.D FRENCH 04516223901 408-000000-115001-00000 REF.D FRENCH 6037 HIGHWOOD 6,840.56 297.43 532.90 411.13 31.90 21.41 2.249.65 34,750.73 1.329.50 5.15 CHECK NO 20040388 589053 VENDOR 280820 - DRAGER SAFETY INC 1193846 144-144360-652990-00000 159754 SUPPL. 0.00 CHECK NO 589035 VENDOR 275160 - DSI LABORATORIES 540.00- 10.481.97 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 46.470.36 9,941.97 56,412.33 0.00 17.98 0.00 17.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17.98 0.00 291.20 0.00 291.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 291.20 0.00 7.32 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7.32 7.32 0.00 160.50 0.00 160.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 160.50 50 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040395 200207-0 159575 DRUG SCREEN 20040396 200205-0 159574 DRUG SCREEN COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 517-121640-649990-00000 0.00 517-121640-649990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589102 VENDOR 308840 DUNN ALUMINUM 20041027 6/17/02 157096 SCREENS FOR WELLSITE 408-253212-649990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040962 589236 VENDOR 362140 DUNN TITLE & ERIC GAUMANN D/P E. GAUMAN 74860010004 191-138785-884100-44200 748600100004 D/P E. GAUMAN 0.00 CHECK NO 20040960 589249 VENDOR 362950 DUNN TITLE & LAURA ROYS D/P L. ROYS 67990560004 191-138785-884100-44200 67990560004 D/P L. ROYS 207095 0.00 CHECK NO 20040669 589016 VENDOR 261490 DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK CIR CT CIVIL/BAL.DUE 7/02 681-421190-634401-00000 CIR CT COST CIVIL/BAL.DUE FROM 8/27 0.00 CHECK NO 20040821 588692 VENDOR 166420 DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK OF COURTS TAX DEED SALES FOR 1999 001-013010-649040-00000 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20041120 588886 PP ~25 PP #25 VENDOR 166490 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 001-000000-218800-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 30.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 30.00 975.00 0.00 975.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.005.00 475.00 0.00 475.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 475.00 5.000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.500.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.100.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4.331.35 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,724.19 0.00 5.000.00 5.000.00 2.500.00 2,500.00 2,100.00 2.100.00 4.331.35 4,331.35 1.724.19 51 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.724.19 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040454 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 588887 VENDOR 166500 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS NSF FEES 001-000000-206901-00000 441-000000-206901-00000 NSF FEES AMT DISC 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040901 20041185 20040901 20040901 20040901 20040901 20040901 20040901 20041185 20040901 20040901 20041185 20039396 20040901 588889 2781143 2781143 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 12319/12255 DP CREDIT 12319/12255 DP CREDIT 2778580 2778580 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2781142 2781142 COPIES,RECORDING.ETC. 2773043 02-2869MMA 2773043 COPIES,RECORDING.ETC. 2781046 2781046 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2773089 2773089 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2782491 2782491 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 12319/12171 DP CREDIT 12319/12171 DP CRED. 2779530 2779530 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2781752 2781752 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 12319/12140 DP CREDIT 12319/12140 DP CRED. 2775898 2775898 COPIES,RECORDING,FEES 2776606 2776606 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. VENDOR 166510 - DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK OF COURTS 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 408-210151-634201-00000 0.00 111-138911-651210-00000 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 681-421190-634400-00000 0.00 111-138911-651210-00000 0.00 681-421190-634401-00000 0.00 111-138911-651210-00000 0.00 408-210151-634201-00000 0.00 113-138910-651210-00000 0.00 113-138312-651210-00000 0.00 408-210151-634201-00000 0.00 325-172977-649030-00000 0.00 111-138911-651210-00000 0.00 AMT NET 371.25 40.00 CHECK TOTAL 6.00 10.33- 2.00 18.00 128.00 2.00 50.00 2.00 11.73- 6.00 6.00 12.43- 19,315.50 1.00 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 '~PAGE 52 VCHR NET 411.25 411.25 6.00 10.33- 2.00 18.00 128.00 2.00 50.00 2.00 11.73- 6.00 6.00 12.43- 19,315.50 1.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041185 20040901 20040901 20040901 20041185 DESCRIPTION 12319/12230 DP CREDIT 12319/12230 DP CRED. 2781632 2781632 COPIES.RECORDING,ETC. 2781911 2781911 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2779527 2779527 COPIES.RECORDING,ETC. 12319/12207 DP CREDIT 12319/12207 DP CRED. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-210151-634201-00000 0.00 111-138911-651210-00000 0.00 111-138911-651210-00000 0.00 113-138910-651210-00000 0.00 408-210151-634201-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589286 VENDOR 900040 - E PAUL FERGUSON JR 303593 REF.E FERGUSON08401704300 441-000000-220024-00000 REF.E FERGUSON 643 PALM AVE 0.00 CHECK NO 20040599 588885 VENDOR 166220 - E. B. SIMMONDS 13213 001-172930-634999-00000 159887 HAWK'S RIDGE 0.00 CHECK NO 20041031 588982 VENDOR 240580 - EAGLE PACKAGING PRODUCTS. INC. 3500 470-173463-652990-00000 158822 LINERS 0.00 CHECK NO 20040391 589063 VENDOR 283280 - EAST NAPLES FIRE CONTROL COMPL.INSP.FEE 198-157410-646180-00000 159457 COMPL.INSP.FEE 0.00 CHECK NO 20040367 588836 VENDOR 123830 - EASTSIDE ANIMAL CLINIC 00-6684 V.HINTZE 610-155410-631970-00000 200973 V.HINTZE 0.00 AMT NET 10.54- 10.00 4.00 1.00 10.96- CHECK TOTAL 11.76 CHECK TOTAL 465.25 CHECK TOTAL 105.18 CHECK TOTAL 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 65.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 IPAGE 53 VCHR NET 10.54- 10.00 4.00 1.00 10.96- 19.495.51 11.76 11.76 465.25 465.25 105.18 105.18 75.00 75.00 65.00 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040460 20040671 588945 VENDOR 214040 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REG.H CASELTINE 001-138710-652990-00000 159862 AWARDS LUNCHEON #25 001-138710-882100-00000 201085 PAYROLL 16J AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 20040898 588714 VENDOR 341610 - EDDIE FROST L.STEWART 8/02 #5721 AND 001-155930-634153-00000 VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20040661 20040661 589207 488034 205722 NEW VOTING EQUIPM. 491068 205722 NEW VOTING EQUIPM. VENDOR 355820 - ELECTIONS SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE, INC. 301-522010-764550-01019 301-522010-764550-01019 1 ~PAGE CHECK NO 20040594 20040387 588902 VENDOR 174350 - ELITE FIRE & SAFETY EQUIPMENT. INC 19258 521-122410-646425-00000 200858 PARTS 19172 144-144360-652990-00000 159753 SUPPL. VCHR NET 65.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK NO 20040455 20040455 20040455 588821 061826 200766 PARTS 061787 200766 PARTS 061829 200766 PARTS VENDOR 114800 - ELLIS K. PHELPS & COMPANY 408-233351-655100-00000 408-233351-655100-00000 408-233351-655100-00000 0.00 14.183.02 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14.183.02 14,228.02 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 118.600.00 0.00 2.649.569.30 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 118,600.00 2.649.569.30 2,768,169.30 0.00 170.66 0.00 170.66 0.00 20.67 0.00 20.67 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 191.33 0.00 1.993.00 0.00 1.993.00 0.00 55.90 0.00 55.90 0.00 168.00 0.00 168.00 54 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040663 588739 VENDOR 061760 206402 PARTS 5840 - ELLIS K. PHELPS COMPANY 413-263611-763100-73031 0.00 CHECK NO 20041024 588907 VENDOR 179840 - EMERGENCY PET HOSPITAL OF COLLIER 13601 001-155410-631980-00000 159930 VET CARE CHECK NO 20040362 20040362 20040362 20040362 20040362 20040362 20040362 589199 B.DRILICH 7/17/02 206905 B.DRILICH 7/17/02 A.MCGEE 6/8/02 206905 A.MCGEE 6/8/02 D.BONILLA 6/18/02 206905 D.BONILLA 6/18 B.DRILICH 7/17/02 206905 B.DRILICH 7/17/02 K.TRAYNOR 5/18/02 206905 K.TRAYNOR 5/18/02 J.MOFFATT 5/30/02 206905 J.MOFFAI-F 5/30/02 V.NII-I'OLO 7/12/02 206905 V.NII-FOLO 7/12/02 VENDOR 353360 - EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OF NAPLES 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 PAGE , 55 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.216.90 10,343. O0 O. O0 CHECK TOTAL O. O0 10,343. O0 10,343. O0 O. O0 95.25 O. O0 95.25 CHECK NO 303600 589287 VENDOR 900040 - EMPIRE BUILDERS OF CC INC. REF.EMPIRE 05226816500 408-000000-115001-00000 REF.EMPIRE BLDRS 3017 GAINESBOROUGH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 95,25 CHECK NO 589288 VENDOR 900040 - ENGLE HOMES/SW FL INC. 0.00 226.85 0.00 226.85 0.00 226.85 0.00 226.85 0.00 226.85 0.00 226.85 0.00 160.55 0.00 160.55 0.00 241.15 0.00 241.15 0.00 226.85 0.00 226.85 0.00 102.05 0.00 102.05 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 9.85 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,411.15 9.85 9.85 SEPTEHSER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 303538 303539 303540 DESCRIPTION REF.ENGLE HM05728474900 REF.ENGLE HM 7860 STRATFORD REF.ENGLE HM 05725312900 REF.ENGLE HM 7930 WEXFORD REF.ENGLE HM 05729266600 REF.ENGLE HM 7852 STRATFORD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303599 589289 VENDOR 900040 ENGLE HOMES/SW FLORIDA INC. REF.ENGLEHM05731631300 408-000000-115001-00000 REF.ENGLE HOMES 7853 STRATFORD CHECK NO 303537 589290 VENDOR 900040 ENGLE HOMES/SWFL INC. REF.ENGLE HOMES0572877150 408-000000-115001-00000 REF.ENGLE HOMES HAVERHILL CT AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 104.74 0.00 104.74 CHECK NO 20040458 589103 VENDOR 309900 11672 159806 RENTAL EQUIPMENT BOOKIE 111-156332-644600-00000 381.45 0.00 381.45 CHECK NO 303550 589291 VENDOR 900040 ERIC M.HOFER REF.E HOFER04503372701 REF. E HOFER 11122 PALMEI-FO 408-000000-115001-00000 14.88 0.00 14.88 CHECK NO 589292 VENDOR 900040 ERROL AND KATHERINE SILVESTRI 303547 REF.SILVESTRI05404027303 408-000000-115001-00000 REF.E SILVESTRI 638 LAMBTON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 501.07 CHECK NO 303601 589293 VENDOR 900040 ESTATE OF EARL FRANKS REF.FRANKS 08101325400 408-000000-115001-00000 REF. EST.E FRANKS 853 MANATEE RD 0.00 54.22 0.00 54.22 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 54.22 0.00 76.42 0.00 76.42 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 76.42 0.00 550.00 0.00 550.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 550.00 0.00 13.24 0.00 13.24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13.24 0.00 66.40 0.00 66.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 66.40 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 56 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041026 20040601 20040601 588740 VENDOR 230364 159567 LUBE 230245 200625 MOTOR OIL 230245 DISC. 200625 MOTOR OIL 6120 - EVANS OIL COMPANY 101-163620-652990-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20041143 20041005 20041144 20040667 588948 VENDOR 214900 - F.P.L. 32536-07331 8/2-9/3/02 32536-07331 8/2-9/3/02 30204-30389 8/2-9/3/02 30204-30389 8/2-9/3/02 32426-54246 8/2-9/3/02 32426-54246 8/2-9/3/02 53212-55092 7/26-8/26/02 53212-55092 7/26-8/26/02 PAGE 57 VCHR NET 50.00 0.00 861.75 0.00 861.75 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303536 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 544.23 0.00 544.23 CHECK NO 20040664 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 10.89- 0.00 CHECK NO 20041029 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 101-163630-643100-00000 0.00 589382 VENDOR 900050 - FAAS BROTHERS. INC. REF.FAAS BR 2002023416 113-138900-322110-00000 REF.FAAS BR 5938 AMBERWOOD 589017 VENDOR 262560 - FAERBER & CLIFF AUG.2002 681-421190-631020-00000 681-421190-631025-00000 202352 DEP.CASES 11,357.09 0.00 2,356.78 0.00 9,878.54 0.00 20.093.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.89- 1.395.09 11,357.09 2,356.78 9,878.54 6250 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 001-010510-641950-00000 588742 VENDOR 4-354-81060 159994 SHIPPING 20,093.50 43,685.91 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.00 0.00 10,950.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 7.85 0.00 10.950.00 10,950.00 7.85 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041037 4-292-71253 200120 SHIPPING 20040465 4-346-86933 201314 SHIPPING 20041037 4-341-34233 200120 SHIPPING 20040888 4-298-25303 01-1602CFMACN 4-298-25303 01-1602CF MACNICOL 20040888 4-298-25303 01-1745CFBUIS 4-298-25303 01-1745CF BUIS 20041035 4-355-60623 4-355-60623 SHIPPING 20040464 4-348-87295 200991 SHIPPING 20041029 4-355-55559 159994 SHIPPING 20041039 4-347-62319 201152 SHIPPING 20040462 4-355-23489 SHIPPING 20040598 4-345-30523 159836 SHIPPING 20041030 4-378-04462 159991 SHIPPING 20040463 4-325-84467 200567 SHIPPING 20040389 4-344-93455 159769 SHIPPING 20041037 4-293-07349 200120 SHIPPING 20041037 4-340-96371 200120 SHIPPING 20040595 4-330-89027 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 490-144610-641950-00000 0.00 681-421510-641950-00000 0.00 490-144610-641950-00000 0.00 681-421190-634401-00000 0.00 681-421190-634401-00000 0.00 001-010110-641950-00000 0.00 001-443010-641950-00000 0.00 001-010510-641950-00000 0.00 118-144210-641950-33781 0.00 001-010110-641950-00000 0.00 001-100130-641950-00000 0.00 001-121152-641950-00000 0.00 001-144510-641950-00000 0.00 001-100130-641950-00000 0.00 490-144610-641950-00000 0.00 490-144610-641950-00000 0.00 313-163673-641950-60018 0.00 313-163611-641950-00000 0.00 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 5.90 0.00 7,75 0.00 5.55 0.00 3.97 0.00 3.98 0.00 PAGE 58 VCHR NET 5.90 7.75 5.55 3.97 3.98 33.58 0.00 33.58 5.55 0.00 5.55 10.50 0.00 10.50 6.35 0.00 6.35 35.42 0.00 35.42 5.15 0.00 8.30 0.00 5.15 8.30 99.70 0.00 99.70 19.60 0.00 19.60 6.05 O. O0 6.05 57.85 5.90 13.00 0.00 13.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 159426 SHIPPING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 313-163673-641950-62071 0.00 313-163673-641950-60012 0.00 CHECK NO 20040900 588900 VENDOR 172870 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 4-372-23110 200437 SHIPPING 20041038 4-364-95906 200515 SHIPPING 20041036 4-370-52000 200057 SHIPPING 20041041 4-341-69583 201721 SHIPPING 20040466 4-340-95341 201721 SHIPPING 113-138312-641950-00000 111-138317-641950-00000 001-000000-142900-00000 111-156313-641950-00000 20041040 4-355-57166 201208 SHIPPING 111-156310-641950-00000 111-156313-641950-00000 111-156341-641950-00000 111-156349-641950-00000 130-157710-641950-00000 119-156342-641950-00000 470-173410-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040995 588881 VENDOR 165200 - FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND PP 9/6/02 001-000000-218500-00000 PP 9/6/02 0.00 CHECK NO 20040371 849794-2 200212 PARTS 20040889 850751 200211 PARTS 20040371 851633 200212 PARTS 588811 VENDOR 105760 - FERGUSON UNDERGROUND 408-253212-655100-00000 408-253212-655100-00000 408-253212-655100-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 7.75 5.90 CHECK TOTAL 5.90 27.00 316.05 5.90 18.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.65 29.65 CHECK TOTAL 800.00 CHECK TOTAL 339.30 10,954.00 31.12 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 77.40 355.60 5.90 27.00 316.05 5.90 25.05 29.65 409.55 800.00 800.00 339.30 10,954.00 31.12 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040600 851261-1 200656 PARTS 20040665 851180 206414 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233313-652990-00000 0.00 408-253212-655100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040369 589099 VENDOR 307380 - FIBER SOLUTIONS OF SOUllJWEST FLA 1528 001-157110-649990-00000 159655 BACKUP FOR PHONE&VMAIL 0.00 CHECK NO 20040372 20040373 20040374 20040372 20040374 588947 17831 202103 FIRE ALARM INSP. 17813 202103 FIRE ALARM INSP. 17834 206680 FIRE ALARM INSP. 17832 202103 FIRE ALARM INSP. 17833 206680 FIRE ALARM INSP. VENDOR 214800 - FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS COMPANY. INC 001-122240-646281-00000 001-122240-646281-00000 001-122240-646281-00000 001-122240-646281-00000 001-122240-646281-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040453 589140 VENDOR 326720 - FIRST NATIONAL BANK 7/02 LOCKBOX 408-210151-634999-00000 201186 RETAIL LOCKBOX 0.00 CHECK NO 20040390 588826 VENDOR 116470 - FIRST TITLE & ABSTRACT, INC. B-12316 306-116360-631650-80607 159694 TITLE SVS 0.00 CHECK NO 589116 VENDOR 318400 - FIRST UNION FINANCIAL Al~r NET 722.00 5,590.50 CHECK TOTAL 336.00 CHECK TOTAL 144.75 100.00 436.35 60.00 410.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,499.17 CHECK TOTAL 460.00 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 722.00 5,590.50 17,636.92 336.00 336.00 144.75 100.00 436.35 60.00 410.00 1,151.10 2,499.17 2,499.17 460.00 460.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041092 PP 25 PP 25 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-000000-216210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588927 20041091 PP #25 PP#25 VENDOR 197290 - FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK 001-000000-216210-00000 16J CHECK NO 20040377 20040377 588818 VENDOR 111530 - FISHER SCIENTIFIC 1348068 205997 PARTS 1286040 205997 PARTS 20040375 1337212 204054 PARTS 20040376 1257903 204232 PARTS 20040377 1388217 205997 PARTS 20040377 1257902 205997 PARTS 408-233350-652310-00000 20040377 408-233350-652310-00000 408-233350-652990-00000 408-210130-652140-00000 408-233352-652990-00000 408-233350-652990-00000 408-233350-652990-00000 1165706 205997 PARTS 408-233350-652310-00000 408-233350-652990-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 133.86 0.00 ! PAGE i 61 VCHR NET 133.86 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 133.86 0.00 204.56 0.00 204.56 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 204.56 0.00 358.80 0.00 358.80 CHECK NO 588952 VENDOR 218480 - FL DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 20040457 W & S PERMIT APPL. 346-116360-649010-80602 159807 WATER 500.00 SEWER 250.00 0.00 120.71 0.00 40.04 0.00 CHECK NO 20040597 588940 VENDOR 210030 - FL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAVEMENT SURV/COND/DESIGN 313-162111-654110-00000 159889 SURVEY AND MANUAL 160.75 0.00 136.01 0.00 136.01 0.00 74.10 0.00 74.10 0.00 60.89- 0.00 60.89- 0.00 60.89 0.00 60.89 0.00 482.36 0.00 180.43 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 662.79 1,392.45 0.00 15.20 0.00 15.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 750.00 0.00 750.00 0.00 750.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040670 20040670 20040670 589072 21-08-0800-1-7 7/24-8/22 21-08-0820-1-3 7/24-8/22 21-08-0821-0-4 7/24-8/22 VENDOR 288620 - FLA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY 130-157710-643400-00000 0.00 001-156140-643400-00000 0.00 001-061010-643400-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040822 588718 VENDOR 363330 - FLAGLER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 99-3561 001-013010-649040-00000 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20040378 20040378 20040378 20040378 589033 31370 200627 PARTS 31409 200627 PARTS 31407 200627 PARTS 31307 200627 PARTS VENDOR 273880 - FLASH EQUIPMENT, INC. 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041025 588803 VENDOR 101720 - FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES 08026 194-101540-648160-00000 158796 ADV.TOURISM MGR 0.00 CHECK NO 20040500 589051 VENDOR 280340 - FLORIDA BAY HOMES REF.2002070582 113-000000-115420-00000 REF.3114 DAHLIA WAY 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 376.42 56.55 242.50 CHECK TOTAL 20.00 CHECK TOTAL 22.29 462.87 233.81 529.41 CHECK TOTAL 20.00 CHECK TOTAL 90.00 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 15.20 376.42 56.55 242.50 675.47 20.00 20.00 22.29 462.87 233.81 529.41 1.248.38 20.00 20.00 90.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041114 588874 VENDOR 158730 - FLORIDA DEPT OF EDUCATION PP~K25 001-000000-218900-00000 PP #25 16J CHECK NO 20040366 588743 VENDOR 6650 - FLORIDA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 2 COPIES DESIGN STAND. 101-163612-654110-00000 159822 STAND.FOR DESIGN,CONST.MAINT. AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 20040904 20041032 20040903 20041023 20040902 588744 T.KUCK 11820 159925 10/1-9/30/03 S.CHRZANOWSKI 1004207 159987 DUES N.KORTI 1004226 159969 10/1-9/30/03 G.YILMAZ/I.BERZON 158820 ENG.SEALS M.RILEY 1001040 159970 10/1-9/30/03 VENDOR 6670 - FLORIDA ENGINEERING SOCIETY 113-138312-654210-00000 113-138312-654210-00000 101-163640-654210-00000 470-173410-654210-00000 101-163640-654210-00000 VCHR DISC 0.00 1 PAGE 63 VCHR NET 90.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 CHECK NO 20040379 588832 VENDOR 119550 - FLORIDA KAI~ATE CENTER INC. 8/12-10/2 130-157710-634999-00000 201053 KARATE 0.00 CHECK NO 20040365 588938 VENDOR 209390 - FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES QUALITY CITIES MAG. 001-100130-654110-00000 159770 YEAR SUB. CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 589054 VENDOR 281320 - FLORIDA MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC 25.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 292.00 292.00 292.00 68.00 292.00 CHECK TOTAL 617.51 CHECK TOTAL 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 20.00 292.00 292.00 292.00 68.00 292.00 1.236.00 617.51 617.51 15.00 15.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040380 020919 200629 PARTS CHECK NO 20041140 20040452 20040452 20041140 20041140 20041140 20041140 20040452 20040452 20040452 20041140 20041140 20040452 20041140 20041140 DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 588748 VENDOR 6790 - FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 87091-34053 7/23-8/21/02 87091-34053 7/23-8/21/02 14702-51446 7/25-8/23/02 14702-51446 7/25-8/23/02 22122-81469 7/25-8/23/02 22122-81469 7/25-8/23/02 77760-35086 7/23-8/21/02 77760-35086 7/23-8/21/02 72492-84055 7/31-8/29/02 72492-84055 7/31-8/29/02 88172-16313 7/26-8/26/02 88172-16313 7/26-8/26/02 51912-14047 8/1-8/30/02 51912-14047 8/1-8/30/02 67247-36027 7/26-8/26/02 67247-36027 7/26-8/26/02 01933-76233 7/29-8/27/02 01933-76233 7/29-8/27/02 75264-82588 7/31-8/29/02 75264-82588 7/31-8/29/02 69075-41483 8/1-8/30/02 69075-41483 8/1-8/30/02 18511-41034 7/29-8/27/02 18511-41034 7/29-8/27/02 15849-70444 7/25-8/23/02 15849-70444 7/25-8/23/02 87091-34053 7/23-8/21/02 87091-34053 7/23-8/21/02 73214-88293 7/30-8/28/02 73214-88293 7/30-8/28/02 490-144610-643100-00000 0.00 101-163624-643100-00000 0,00 001-155410-643100-00000 0.00 152-162541-643100-00000 0,00 152-162541-643100-00000 0.00 111-156313-643100-00000 0.00 408-253221-643100-00000 0.00 111-156332-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 408-233313-643100-00000 0.00 408-253221-643100-00000 0.00 111-156332-643100-00000 0.00 101-163624-643100-00000 0.00 001-000000-115400-00000 0.00 155-112593-643100-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 170.42 0.00 '~PAGE '~ 64 VCHR NET 170.42 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 170.42 393.99 0.00 393.99 21.84 0.00 21.84 3,797.99 0,00 3.797.99 18.96 0.00 18.96 8.46 0.00 3,907.96 0.00 2,060.95 0.00 1,239.47 0.00 8.46 3,907.96 2,060.95 1,239.47 10.29 0,00 10.29 9.64 0.00 2.676.16 0.00 9.64 2.676.16 18.45 0.00 18.45 616.25 0.00 616.25 202.99 0.00 202.99 10.04 0.00 10.04 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041140 79337-32260 79337-32260 20041140 69931-32247 69931-32247 20041140 03801-54062 03801-54062 20040452 04021-36196 04021-36196 20040452 97219-34058 97219-34058 20040452 96340-21449 96340-21449 20040452 74697-39044 74697-39044 20041140 80381-36118 80381-36118 20040452 11720-15578 11720-15578 20041140 95646-99230 95646-99230 20041140 11744-78113 11744-78113 20040452 11784-34336 11784-34336 20041140 74357-30069 74357-30069 20040452 33496-39108 33496-39108 20041140 42477-61549 42477-61549 20040452 76422-01375 76422-01375 20041140 74407-37091 74407-37091 DESCRIPTION 7/31-8/29/02 7/31-8/29/02 7/30-8/28/02 7/30-8/28/02 7/24-8/22/02 7/24-8/22/02 7/29-8/27/02 7/29-8/27/02 7/24-8/22/02 7/24-8/22/02 7/25-8/23/02 7/25-8/23/02 7/25-8/23/02 7/25-8/23/02 7/24-8/22/02 7/24-8/22/02 7/29-8/27/02 7/29-8/27/02 7/26-8/26/02 7/26-8/26/02 7/24-8/22/02 7/24-8/22/02 7/29-8/27/02 7/29-8/27/02 7/25-8/23/02 7/25-8/23/02 3/15-4/15/02 3/15-4/15/02 7/24-8/22/02 7/24-8/22/02 7/29-8/27/02 7/29-8/27/02 7/25-8/23/02 7/25-8/23/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 152-162541-643100-00000 0.00 152-162541-643100-00000 0.00 150-162545-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 001-157110-643100-00000 0.00 101-163624-643100-00000 0.00 001-172930-643100-00000 0.00 001-061010-643100-00000 0.00 490-144610-643100-00000 0,00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 111-163646-643100-00000 0.00 160-162518-643100-00000 0.00 408-253221-643100-00000 0,00 101-163620-643100-00000 0.00 144-144360-643100-00000 0.00 111-163646-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0,00 101-163620-643100-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 24.26 0.00 24.26 8.46 0.00 8.46 52.89 0.00 52.89 12.28 0.00 12.28 1,356.97 0.00 1,356.97 316.06 0.00 316.06 51.07 0.00 51.07 140.58 93.72 0.00 234.30 33.63 0.00 33.63 204,22 0.00 204.22 318.72 0.00 318.72 8.46 0.00 8.46 7.36 0.00 7.36 385.78 0.00 385.78 16.31 0.00 16.31 10.07 0.00 10.07 220.39 0.00 220.39 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041140 92617-71175 7/26-8/26/02 92617-71175 7/26-8/26/02 20041140 35318-65347 7/24-8/22/02 35318-65347 7/24-8/22/02 20040452 76318-00443 7/25-8/23/02 76318-00443 7/25-8/23/02 20040452 89618-38201 7/31-8/29/02 89618-38201 7/31-8/29/02 20040452 97752-59121 7/29-8/27/02 97752-59121 7/29-8/27/02 20041140 06515-54057 7/24-8/22/02 06515-54057 7/24-8/22/02 20041140 74267-33023 7/25-8/23/02 74267-33023 7/25-8/23/02 20041140 72276-43017 7/30-8/28/02 72276-43017 7/30-8/28/02 20041140 52568-34341 7/23-8/21/02 52568-34341 7/23-8/21/02 20040452 05698-81444 7/25-8/23/02 05698-81444 7/25-8/23/02 20041140 02679-74525 7/30-8/28/02 02679-74525 7/30-8/28/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 160-162518-643100-00000 0.00 490-144610-643100-00000 0.00 101-163624-643100-00000 0.00 001-156180-643100-00000 0.00 408-233352-643100-00000 0.00 001-061010-643100-00000 0.00 490-144610-643100-00000 0.00 101-163620-643100-00000 0.00 155-112593-643100-00000 0.00 490-144610-643100-00000 0.00 101-163624-643100-00000 0.00 152-162541-643100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040386 589111 VENDOR 314660 - FLORIDA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 115 001-156363-646314-00000 159042 REMOVE TREE 0.00 CHECK NO 303546 303544 589294 VENDOR 900040 - FLORIDA STATE UNDERGROUND REF.FL ST UNDO5094444500 408-000000-115001-00000 REF.FL ST UND.O ISLAND WALK REF.FL ST UNDO4794409400 408-000000-115001-00000 REF.FL ST UND.O BELLEZZA LN 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 8.46 306.35 275.05 964.57 12.93 326.21 217.47 669.02 17.23 450.95 320.97 8.46 CHECK TOTAL 750.00 CHECK TOTAL 647.86 673.78 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 I PAGE 66 VCHR NET 8.46 306.35 275.05 964.57 12.93 543.68 669.02 17.23 450.95 320.97 8.46 21.832.34 750.00 750.00 647.86 673.78 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 303545 303543 DESCRIPTION REF.FL ST UNDO4794408400 REF.FL ST UND 0 CELLE WAY REF.FL ST UNDO7894407200 REF.FL STATE UNDERGR TAMIAMI TR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040596 589251 VENDOR 363030 - FLORIDA STORMWATER ASSOCIATION R.WILEY MMB/SHIP 001-172970-654210-00000 159432 MMB/SHIP RENEWAL WILEY 0.00 CHECK NO 20040381 589117 VENDOR 318590 - FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC 0013897 521-122410-646425-00000 200630 PARTS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041141 20041141 20041141 20041141 20041141 20041141 20041141 588984 010019512-2 010019512-2 000576615-9 000576615=9 001065735-1 001065735-1 000473365-5 000473365-5 010085645-9 010085645-9 009818435-1 009818435-1 001065725-2 001065725-2 VENDOR 243280 - FLORIDA WATER SERVICES 001-156363-643400-00000 001-156363-643400-00000 001-156160-643400-00000 001-156363-643400-00000 001-156363-643400-00000 001-156363-643400-00000 001-156160-643400-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303549 589295 VENDOR 900040 - FOOTE. ROBERT AND DUNN, M REF.FOOTE,ROB04707281801 408-000000-115001-00000 REF.FOOTE,ROBERT,DUNN5767PERSIMMON 0.00 AMI' NET 715.54 259.20 CHECK TOTAL 1,000.00 CHECK TOTAL 164.15 CHECK TOTAL 93.68 488.25 227.75 163.43 55.53 649.70 211.78 CHECK TOTAL 27.42 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 715.54 259.20 2,296.38 1,000.00 1,000.00 164.15 164.15 93.68 488.25 227.75 163.43 55.53 649.70 211.78 1,890.12 27,42 SEPTEHSER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040456 588837 VENDOR 126420 - FORESTRY RESOURCES 602842 111-156334-646318-00000 111-156334-652310-00000 201089 CYPRESS 16J 1 CHECK NO 20040712 589250 VENDOR 363000 - FORT LAUDERDALE CSI REGISTER-T RUBERTO 111-156332-654360-00000 159808 T RUBERTO REGISTER AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20041034 20041034 20041034 588906 8/30/02 201807 GRAVESITES 6/28/02 201807 GRAVESITES 7/31/02 201807 GRAVESITES VENDOR 179580 - FORT MYERS VAULT COMPANY 001-122370-631990-00000 001-122370-631990-00000 001-122370-631990-00000 0.00 1,189.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 68 CHECK NO 303552 589296 VENDOR 900040 - FRED GIUFFRIDA REF.GIUFFRIDA04604626301 408-000000-115001-00000 REF.F GIUFFRIDA 11802 QUAIL VLGE VCHR NET 27.42 CHECK NO 588872 VENDOR 157320 - FREEMAN AND FREEMAN INC. 20040784 #66 191-138785-884200-33752 159833 CHAMBERLAIN 71020920005 1,189.30 CHECK NO 20041008 588935 VENDOR 203680 - FUEL TECH INC. 021428 495-192350-646410-00000 202049 REPAIRS 1,189.30 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 0.00 620.00 0.00 620.00 0.00 260.00 0.00 260.00 0.00 360,00 0.00 360.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,240.00 0.00 86.01 0.00 86.01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 86.01 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 250.00 2,825.45 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 2,825.45 2,825.45 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 16J 1 PAGE 69 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 589154 20041184 776940 205306 UNIFORMS 20041184 780965 205306 UNIFORMS 20041184 793092 205306 UNIFORMS 20041184 760610 205306 UNIFORMS 20041184 754973 205306 UNIFORMS 20041184 805239 205306 UNIFORMS 20041184 772862 205306 UNIFORMS 20041184 748777 205306 UNIFORMS 20041184 797133 205306 UNIFORMS VENDOR 333980 - G&K SERVICES 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 34.61 0.00 34.61 49.41 0.00 49.41 43.75 0.00 43.75 43.17 0.00 43.17 38.10 0.00 38.10 47.55 0.00 47.55 62.45- 0.00 62.45- 41.73 0.00 41.73 47.55 0.00 47.55 20041184 784993 205306 UNIFORMS 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 38.35 0.00 38.35 20041184 750893 205306 UNIFORMS 20041184 764697 205306 UNIFORMS 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 128.57 0.00 128.57 38.67 0.00 38.67 20041184 809307 205306 UNIFORMS 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 47.55 0.00 47.55 20041184 789038 205306 UNIFORMS 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20041184 746826 205306 UNIFORMS 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 45.97 0.00 45.97 20041184 768810 205306 UNIFORMS 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 31.69 0.00 31.69 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041184 801183 205306 UNIFORMS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-163646-652130-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589161 VENDOR 339190 - G&K SERVICES 20041068 812555 201127 UNIFORMS 20041068 813375 201127 UNIFORMS 101-163620-652130-00000 0.00 101-163620-652130-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303673 589383 VENDOR 900050 - C~ARY JUAREZ REFUND ~J)OPTION GARY JUAREZ ADOPTION REFUND 001-155410-346410-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303662 589297 VENDOR 900040 - GARY WALKER 02700709903 WATER REFD GARY WALKER WATER REF 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040702 20040702 588749 VENDOR 300409 201227 SUPPLIES 301965 201227 SUPPLIES 7320 - GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC. 129-156110-652610-33775 ART NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 40.95 0.00 40.95 CHECK NO 20040697 588998 VENDOR 254810 - GBSI 12616 206650 MAILING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 655.17 CHECK NO 20040615 85.47 0.00 85.47 311.03 0.00 311.03 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 396.50 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 44.01 0.00 44.01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 44.01 0.00 53.20 0.00 53.20 129-156110-652610-33775 0.00 473-173413-634999-00000 0.00 589243 VENDOR 362700 - GCO CARPET OUTLET V. RODRIGUEZ 8/17 191-138785-884100-44200 207026 V. RODRIGUEZ 26681800001 274.40 0.00 274.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 327.60 18.219.26 CHECK TOTAL 2.430.96 0.00 0.00 18.219.26 0.00 18,219.26 0.00 2.430.96 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 16J AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 2,430.96 71 CHECK NO 303661 589298 VENDOR 900040 - GEORGE SHERRILL 04200172601 WATER REFD 408-000000-115001-00000 G SHERRILL WATER REF 0.00 138.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 138.00 138.00 CHECK NO 303663 589299 VENDOR 900040 - GERALD AND DONNA DEFLORIO 03600261803 WATER REFD 408-000000-115001-00000 G DEFLORIO WATER REF 0.00 17.28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 17.28 17.28 CHECK NO 20040710 588712 VENDOR 254610 - GFOA REGISTER-WINONA STONE AND 001-101520-654360-00000 0.00 550.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 550.00 550.00 CHECK NO 303665 589300 VENDOR 900040 - GILBERT AND TAMARACOURET 05431653800 WATER REFD 408-000000-115001-00000 G COURET WATER REF 0.00 16.32 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 16.32 16.32 CHECK NO 303667 589301 VENDOR 900040 - GLACID GROUP OF FL 08000274000 WATER REFD 408-000000-115001-00000 GLACID GROUP OF FL WATER REF 0.00 82.38 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 82.38 82.38 CHECK NO 20040703 20040703 588751 02-9820 J JACKSON 200975 02-9820 J JACKSON 02-9885 B JEPSON 200975 02-9885 B JEPSON VENDOR 7740 - GOLDEN GATE ANIMAL CLINIC 610-155410-631970-00000 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 0.00 75.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 75.00 150.00 CHECK NO 20040929 588752 VENDOR 75911 201599 SUPPLIES 7770 - GOLDEN GATE NURSERY 408-233351-646314-00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040929 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 75879 201599 SUPPLIES 20040928 75956 200836 SUPPLIES 20041051 76241 159848 TURF 20040928 75954 200836 SUPPLIES 20040928 75965 200836 SUPPLIES 20040928 75997 200836 SUPPLIES 20040928 75961 200836 SUPPLIES 20041061 75937 206507 POSTS 20040928 75964 200836 SUPPLIES 408-233351-646314-00000 0.00 111-163645-646314-00000 0.00 111-163645-646314-00000 0.00 111-163645-646314-00000 0.00 111-163645-646314-00000 0.00 111-163645-646314-00000 0.00 111-163645-646314-00000 0.00 408-253212-646314-00000 0.00 111-163645-646314-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040701 588896 VENDOR 171810 - GOLDEN GATE POOL SUPPLIES INC. 17266 111-156349-652311-00000 202787 SUPPLIES 0.00 CHECK NO 20040849 589020 VENDOR 264430 - GOODLETTE, COLEMAN & JOHNSON, P.A. CLOSING-LB/P GROVEWAY 313-163673-631990-62071 159430 CLOSING-LB/P GROVELAND 0.00 CHECK NO 20041044 588944 VENDOR 213590 - GORDON HAZEN 1/8-8/30 TRVL G.HAZEN 1/8-8/30 TRVL G.I~qZEN 111-156380-640200-00000 0.00 AMT NET 25.00 190.00 22.50 190.00 95.00 190.00 140.00 163.80 190.00 CHECK TOTAL 132.00 CHECK TOTAL 350.00 CHECK TOTAL 89.90 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 25.00 190.00 22.50 190.00 95.00 190.00 140.00 163.80 190.00 1,256.30 132.00 132.00 350.00 350.00 89.90 89.90 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040704 20040704 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 588750 VENDOR 7700 - GORMAN COMPANY, INC. S1868983.001 408-253211-652310-00000 200385 MURATIC ACID S1868992.001 408-253211-652310-00000 200385 MURATIC ACID AMT DISC 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040931 20040930 20040931 20040931 588904 VENDOR 178630 - GRAINGER 287-542783-9 201414 SUPPLIES 287-223920-3 200726 SUPPLIES 834-223919-4 201414 SUPPLIES 490-065363-8 201414 SUPPLIES 408-233352-652990-00000 0.00 408-210130-652410-00000 0.00 408-233352-652990-00000 0.00 408-233352-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040700 589198 VENDOR 352990 - GRAYBAR 0630260191 159399 GREENLEE TRACKER II 101-163630-646510-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040934 20041067 20041067 20041067 20040935 588755 VENDOR 0630257528 200782 PARTS 0630258864 201488 ELEC 0630259268 201488 ELECTRIC 0630259046 201488 ELEC 0620882083 201351 PARTS 7900 - GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 408-233351-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652993-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-122240-652993-00000 0.00 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 AMl' NET 116.46 50.00- CHECK TOTAL 7.44 463.16 37.56 110.36 CHECK TOTAL 601.13 CHECK TOTAL 415.52 468.00 167.11 314.05 41.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 pAGE 73 VCHR NET 116.46 50.00- 66.46 7.44 463.16 37.56 110.36 618.52 601.13 601.13 415.52 468.00 167.11 314.05 41. O0 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041067 0630258650 201488 ELECTRIC 20041067 0630258037 201488 ELEC 20040936 0630257034 201421 SUPPLIES 20041067 0630257890 201488 ELEC 20040935 0620880074 201351 PARTS 20041067 0630258803 201488 ELEC 20040934 0630256720 200782 PARTS 20041067 0630257028 201488 ELECTRIC 20041067 0630258947 201488 ELECTRIC 20040933 0630260413 200628 SUPPLIES 20041067 0630259146 201488 ELECTRIC 20040935 0620881505 201351 PARTS 20041067 0630258920 201488 ELECTRIC 20041067 0630258364 201488 ELECTRIC 20040927 0630257628 201800 PARTS 20040935 0620881508 201351 PARTS 20041067 0630258917 201488 ELECTRIC COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-122240-652993-00000 0.00 408-233352-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652993-00000 0.00 408-233351-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 408-233312-655200-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 408-253211-655100-00000 0.00 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652991-00000 0.00 AMT NET 58.19 601.80 32.34 567.45 114.08 119.40 43.02 90.58 75.81 850.03 23.23 41.00 5.48 26.52 617.06 376.52 24.34 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 58.19 601.80 32.34 567.45 114.08 119.40 43.02 90.58 75.81 850.03 23.23 41.00 5.48 26.52 617.06 376.52 24.34 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040933 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 0630257564 200628 SUPPLIES 20040935 0620881347 201351 PARTS 20040933 0630257629 200628 SUPPLIES 20040935 0620881326 201351 PARTS 20040935 0620880075 201351 PARTS 20040934 0630256719 200782 PARTS 20040935 0620882445 201351 PARTS 408-233312-655200-00000 0.00 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 408-233312-655200-00000 0.00 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 408-233351-652990-00000 0.00 001-121141-652910-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040604 588855 VENDOR 138810 - GREELEY & HANSEN 120840 411-273511-763100-70070 413-263611-763100-73066 205026 TO 8/14/02 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303672 589384 VENDOR 900050 - GREG HENDRICHKSON REFUND ADOPTION 001-155410-346410-00000 GREG HENDRICKSON ADOPTION REFUND 16J CHECK NO 303671 589385 VENDOR 900050 - GREYSTIONE BUILDERS INC FIRE REVIEW REFUND 113-000000-209102-00000 GREYSTIONE BUILDERS INC FIRE REFUND AMT NET VCHR DISC 28.20 0.00 CHECK NO 20041052 589094 VENDOR 299230 - GUARDIAN PERSONAL STOFU~GE UNIT A3-313 & D2-153 111-156341-646710-00000 111-156425-644170-00000 159904 A3 SEPT-OCT D2 SEPT 1 PAGE VCHR NET 28.20 14.02 0.00 14.02 320.00 0.00 320.00 63.70 0.00 63.70 25.48 0.00 25.48 74.80 0.00 74.80 26.14 0.00 26.14 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10,968.00 18,908.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,624.87 29,876.00 29,876.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0,00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 0.00 108.00 0,00 58.00 0.00 166.00 75 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 303666 589302 VENDOR 900040 - GULF COAST DEV INC 04822885100 WATER REFD 408-000000-115001-00000 GULF COAST DEV WATER REF CHECK NO 303669 589303 VENDOR 900040 - GULF COAST HOLIDAY ON NAPLES INC 06001998903 WATER REFD 408-000000-115001-00000 GULF COAST HOLIDAY ON NAP WATER REF AliT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 166.00 CHECK NO 20040967 20040968 589173 VENDOR 345360 - GULF COAST LANDFILL N0702-02 408-233312-634999-00000 201918 TO 8/7/02 S0702-02 408-233352-634999-00000 201920 TO 8/7/02 0.00 76.60 0.00 76.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 76.60 CHECK NO 20040705 588756 VENDOR 7990 - GULFSHORE ANIMAL CLINIC 02-10541 G BILLING 610-155410-631970-00000 200987 G BILLING 02-10541 0.00 31.70 0.00 31.70 CHECK NO 20041055 589197 12239 201645 VENDOR 352910 - H20 SERVICES INC 495-192370-634999-00000 COFFEE SERV 0.00 CHECK NO 303659 303660 589304 VENDOR 900040 - HALSTA1-F PARTNERSHIP 052266500001'LALSTAI-I' WREFD 408-000000-115001-00000 I~ALSTA1-F WATER REF 05226291800 WATER REFD 408-000000-115001-00000 I~ALSTA1-F WATER REF CHECK TOTAL 0.00 31.70 19.517.44 22,907.26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 19.517.44 0.00 22,907.26 0.00 42,424.70 0.00 96.86 0.00 96.86 0.00 167.00 0.00 167.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 263.86 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 23.50 0.00 23.50 0.00 23.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 588893 20040602 #1 206546 TO 8/9/02 20040602 #1 RETAINAGE 206546 TO 8/9/02 RETAINAGE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 169540 - HANNULA LANDSCAPING, INC. 111-163646-763100-60098 ANT DISC 0.00 111-000000-205100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588757 20041066 02 10098 R FOX 201012 SPAY NEUTER 20041066 02 10118 J BALTELYON 201012 SPAY NEUTER 20041066 02 10176 B ATHANACIA 201012 SPAY NEUTER 20041066 02 10187 K SINGH 201012 SPAY NEUTER 20041066 02 10156 B RENAUD 201012 SPAY NEUTER VENDOR 8180 - HARBORSIDE ANIMAL CLINIC 610-155410-631970-00000 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 65,311.55 0.00 6,531.15- 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 589136 20041100 PP#25 PP ~T25 !PAGE ~, 77 VCHR NET CHECK NO 20040605 65.311.55 6.531.15- CHECK NO 20041058 58.780.40 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 60.00 0,00 60.00 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 310.00 0.00 179.08 0.00 179.08 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 179.08 8,299.20 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 0.00 8,299.20 VENDOR 323370 - HARRIS COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 001-000000-218810-00000 588871 VENDOR 156920 - HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES 4348 412-273511-631400-70063 4652 7/31/02 589167 VENDOR 343340 - HEFTY TRUCKING INC 11418 111-156332-646315-00000 204140 SAND 8,299.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 640.00 0.00 640.00 0.00 640.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 589131 20040708 20041180 20040698 20041180 20040698 20041180 20041180 20040707 20040708 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION VENDOR 322600 - HELENA CHEMCAL, CO. ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC ~J'IT NET 111-156332-652310-00000 001-172930-652310-00000 111-156332-652310-00000 001-172930-652310-00000 111-156332-652310-00000 001-172930-652310-00000 001-172930-652310-00000 111-156334-652310-00000 111-156332-652310-00000 22725472 206762 MOLE CRICKET BAIT 22725327 202241 CHEMCALS 22725470 206800 PESTICIDE 22725246 202241 CHEMCALS 22725469 206800 PESTICIDE 22724053 202241CHEMCALS 22724682 202241CHEMCALS 22725468 206764 PESTICIDE 22725471 206762 MOLE CRICKET BAIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040706 589188 VENDOR 350490 - HERMAN MILLER WORKPLqCE RESOURCE 07209 001-010510-651930-00000 206897 CHAIRS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041183 20040261 589201 VENDOR 353870 - HERMAN MILLER WORKPLACE RESOURCE 07393 001-061010-646110-00000 204887 FURNITURE 07403 001-061010-646110-00000 206060 CMAIRS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589257 VENDOR 363340 - HIRECHECK, INC. 1,063.50 212.00 10,626.00 7,398.00 10,626.00 415.20 16,489.28 3,668.50 1,063.50 CHECK TOTAL 1,853.38 CHECK TOTAL 13,910.11 16,154.94 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 1,063.50 212. O0 10,626.00 7,398.00 10,626.00 415.20 16,489.28 3,668.50 1,063.50 51,561.98 1,853.38 1,853.38 13,910.11 16,154.94 30,065.05 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041053 7005FC0207 & 7005FC0208 159993 RECORD CHECK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-010510-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303670 589305 VENDOR 900040 - HITTNER, C AND PARRAS, 05711437401 WATER REFD 408-000000-115001-00000 HITTNER WATER REF 0.00 CHECK NO 588758 VENDOR 8810 - HOLE MONTES AND ASSOC INC 20040966 44091 414-263611-631400-74011 205426 3/30-7/26/02 0.00 CHECK NO 588879 20041062 5140228 201159 SUPPLIES 20041062 9040937 201159 SUPPLIES 20041063 0080504 201486 SUPPLIES 20041063 8092395 201486 SUPPLIES 20041063 4084554 201486 SUPPLIES 20041064 00200003 201486 SUPPLIES 20041064 9070548 201486 SUPPLIES 20041060 4014164 200912 SUPPLIES 20041064 1094280 201486 SUPPLIES VENDOR 164250 - HOME DEPOT 111-156332-652990-00000 111-156332-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 001-156363-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 155.00 CHECK TOTAL 83.40 CHECK TOTAL 8,345.75 CHECK TOTAL 59.97 191.02 158.24 73.98 15.88 11.34 34.66 104.29 6.89 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 155.00 155.00 83.40 83.40 8,345.75 8,345.75 59.97 191.02 158.24 73.98 15.88 11.34 34.66 104.29 6.89 79 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 656.27 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040780 20040636 DESCRIPTION 589196 VENDOR 352900 - HOME DEPOT 7190763 159135 MAWKINS 36320760007 1211544 158401 TOLLEY 40743640004 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC ~ NET 191-138785-884200-44200 0.00 191-138785-884200-33752 0.00 CHECK NO 20040573 20040633 20040629 20040635 20040591 20040634 20040631 20040630 20040572 20040632 20040628 589056 8140044 62045040005 R CORREA 206665 2042035 158865 G. LEON 36383240001 4212019 159505 D. VEGA 28931400007 4140270 159503 J. FRANCOIS 35767240000 5201238 21820002063 206688 LEBALLY 1043207 159728 L. MAYER 83243000347 4043244 159014 M. CLERCIN 28930440000 8211967 159238 N. LEBAILLY 21820002063 1140137 28930440000 M CLERAN 206773 6140207 159504 G. LEON 36383240001 5211875 159013 N. LEBAILLY 21820002063 VENDOR 281640 - HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 191-138785-884100-44200 0.00 191-138785-884100-44200 0.00 191-138785-884100-33752 0.00 191-138785-884100-44200 0.00 191-138785-884100-44200 0.00 191-138785-884100-33752 0.00 191-138785-884100-44200 0.00 191-138785-884100-44200 0.00 191-138785-884100-33752 0.00 191-138785-884100-33752 0.00 191-138785-884100-44200 0.00 CHECK NO 20040699 589078 VENDOR 291390 - HOOVER PUMPING SYSTEMS 21677 111-156332-634999-00000 159803 PUMPING SYSTEMS 0.00 79.99 35.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,457.36 251.10 134.00 849.00 1,548. O0 327.99 30.00 686.99 1,652.95 169,00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 355.20 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 '~AGE VCHR NET 79.99 35.00 114.99 2,457.36 251.10 134.00 849. O0 1,548.00 327.99 30.00 686.99 1,652.95 169.00 30.00 8,136.39 355.20 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20039807 589110 VENDOR 314010 - HORSESHOE DEVELOPMENT L.C. 9/02 STORMWATER 001-172910-644100-00000 201506 9/02 STORMWATER 0.00 CHECK NO 20041059 589049 5302 200972 VENDOR 279710 - HORVATH ELECTRIC MOTORS 111-156332-646311-00000 ELECTRIC MOTORS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041065 20041065 589091 VENDOR 296660 - HUMANE SOCIETY OF COLLIER CO INC 02 10496 610-155410-631970-00000 201018 SPAY NEUTER 02 10208 M JIMERSON 610-155410-631970-00000 201018 SPAY NEUTER 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20040695 589184 VENDOR 349480 - HURRICANE SOLUTIONS, INC. 1114 001-122240-634999-00000 158936 3M CLEAR FILM 5,697.49 0.00 CHECK NO 589100 VENDOR 308470 - I-CON SYSTEMS INC 20040696 80248 001-122240-652995-00000 158190 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 588849 20041113 PP~K25 PP #25 VENDOR 134560 - ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 001-000000-217001-00000 2,836.47 0.00 CHECK NO 20041130 589104 VENDOR 310350 - IMAGE ONE 41233 205777 STORAGE 301-210140-764900-01014 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 PAGE 81 VCHR NET 355.20 5,697.49 5,697,49 2,836.47 2,836.47 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 90.00 0.00 743.40 0.00 743.40 CHECK TOTAL 0,00 743.40 0.00 664.22 0.00 664.22 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 664.22 27,538.51 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,569.65 0.00 0.00 27,538.51 27,538.51 3,569.65 SEPTEHBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC CHECK NO 588759 VENDOR 20041049 371 9/1-9/30 371 9/1-9/30 9180 - IMMOKALEE DISPOSAL CO 001-122370-643300-00000 16J CHECK NO 20041054 20041050 588863 VENDOR 147920 - IMMOKALEE WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 69988 496-192340-649010-33327 159921DEVELOP DP, AW REVIEW 212606540057/24-8/26 001-122370-643400-00000 2126065400 7/24-8/26 /~MT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20041181 588760 VENDOR 9270 - INDUSTRIAL AIR PRODUCTS 39249 470-173441-652990-00000 201194 AIR PRODUCTS 1 CHECK NO 303668 589306 VENDOR 900040 - INGE AND THEO MUELLER 06304090001 WATER REFD 408-000000-115001-00000 I MUELLER WATER REF PAGE CHECK NO 20041116 20041115 588848 PP #25 PP #25 PP #25 PP #25 VENDOR 134360 - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 001-000000-218900-00000 001-000000-218900-00000 VCHR NET 3.569.65 0.00 72.10 0.00 72.10 CHECK NO 20041117 588971 PP #25 PP #25 VENDOR 234030 - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 001-000000-218900-00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 72.10 0.00 58.75 0.00 58.75 0.00 7.63 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7.63 66.38 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.00 0.00 179.74 0.00 179.74 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 179.74 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 175.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 175.00 82 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 588910 20040932 2682 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 183160 - IRELAND NEEDLE CRAFT, INC 001-432040-652110-00000 001-432040-641950-00000 158862 ROBE-JUDGE MURPHY AMT DISC 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303664 589307 VENDOR 900040 - ISTRAN DUDAS 04500642601 WATER REFD ISTRAN DUDAS WATER REF 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040308 588805 VENDOR 102860 - J & M PUMP SERVICE, INC. 15355 408-253212-634999-00000 159092 SVS 0.00 CHECK NO 303606 589308 VENDOR 900040 - J A CHUGG 03900156201 JA CHUGG JA CHUGG 1298 GRAND CANAL DR 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040876 588968 VENDOR 231810 - J. M. TODD COMPANY 83425 111-156313-646710-00000 201491 8/2-9/1/02 0.00 CHECK NO 588764 VENDOR 20040264 35028 206671 7/7-8/3 20040264 35946 206671 6/11/02 20040264 33936 206671 6/7-7/6 10570 - J. W. CRAFT 130-157710-644600-00000 130-157710-644600-00000 130-157710-644600-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 588949 VENDOR 215840 - 2.J. KELLER & ASSOCIATES, INC. AMT NET 250.00 16.00 CHECK TOTAL 14.64 CHECK TOTAL 180.98 CHECK TOTAL 33.66 CHECK TOTAL 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 70.00 35.00 75. O0 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 266.00 266.00 14.64 14.64 180.98 180.98 33.66 33.66 25.00 25.00 70.00 35.00 75.00 180.00 83 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040307 004608241 159761 EZ NEWSLETTER CUSTOMIZER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 518-121630-652990-00000 0.00 518-121630-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588967 20040877 82992 200668 8/22-9/21/02 20041173 80671 159956 7/30/01-7/29/03 20041173 80672 159956 7/30/01-7/29/03 VENDOR 231020 - J.M. TODD COMPANY 408-233313-651210-00000 001-155910-646710-00000 001-155910-646710-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589168 20041178 36124 202068 8/4-31/02 20040861 36135 159883 8/4-31/02 20041178 36125 202068 8/4-8/31 20040875 36825 203297 8/4-16/02 VENDOR 343350 - J.W. C~FT 470-173441-634999-00000 470-173443-634999-00000 101-163624-634999-00000 470-173443-634999-00000 001-172930-644600-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 588761 VENDOR 20040851 01861 206699 SUPPLIES 20040841 01568 206124 SUPPLIES 20040851 01999 206699 SUPPLIES 20040298 01610 206090 SUPPLIES 9540 - JACK AND ANN'S FEED 111-156349-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 111-156349-652990-00000 495-192330-652990-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 249.00 24.80 CHECK TOTAL 20.00 374. O0 31.35 CHECK TOTAL 26.60 36.80 67.50 70.00 38.30 CHECK TOTAL 7.93 5.89 7.65 9.08 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 273.80 273.80 20.00 374.00 31.35 425.35 63.40 67.50 70.00 38.30 239,20 7.93 5,89 7.65 9.08 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040297 01292 206699 SUPPLIES 20040852 02046 204829 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 589143 VENDOR 328300 20040301 02-778 205475 PARTS CHECK NO 588978 VENDOR 239620 20040446 54855 206819 DMI KIT CHECK NO 303507 589309 VENDOR 900040 04603808800 BARTHEL BARllqEL 12824 COCO PLUN LN CHECK NO 303508 589310 VENDOR 900040 04823332501 BARTHEL BARTHEL 8142 LOWBANK DR CHECK NO 20040265 588976 VENDOR 238580 1987098 206877 FL CRIM CA~SE UPDATE CHECK NO 20040299 20040300 588827 VENDOR 116700 79603 201286 SUPPLIES 79543 103857 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156349-652910-00000 0.00 101-163620-652990-00000 0.00 JACOBS AIR WATER SYSTEMS 408-253211-655100-00000 16J JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 101-163640-652910-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1.52 0.00 JAMES A AND WENDY K BARTHEL 408-000000-115001-00000 1 JAMES BARTHEL 408-000000-115001-00000 PAGE JAMES PUBLISHING, INC. 001-454010-654110-00000 VCHR NET 1.52 JAMESON SUPPLY INC. 001-122240-652995-00000 30.29 0.00 30.29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 62.36 0.00 629.00 0.00 629.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 629.00 0.00 1,108.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 9.15 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,108.00 1,108.00 9.15 9.15 0.00 174.15 0.00 174.15 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 174.15 0.00 76.94 0.00 76.94 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 76.94 0.00 28.70 0.00 28.70 0.00 556.72 0.00 412-273511-652990-70033 0.00 412-273511-652990-70881 0.00 556.72 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040299 79609 201286 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303506 589311 VENDOR 900040 JAMIE HORSLEY 04634695801HORSLEY HORSLEY 11125 LONGSHORE WAY W 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303462 589413 VENDOR 900080 JANE TALBERT AMB REF JANE TALBERT 6/7 AMB REF JANE TALBERT 0223757-1 490-000000-116004-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589106 VENDOR 310970 20040835 8/1-30 TRVL J.SEITZ 8/1-30 TRVL J.SEITZ JASON C SEITZ 001-178985-640200-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303509 589312 VENDOR 900040 JENNIFER DUNKLEBERGER 04501129202 DUNKLEBERGER 408-000000-115001-00000 DUNKLEBERGER 95 JOHNNYCAKE DR 16J CHECK NO 303510 589313 VENDOR 900040 JENNIFER WHITIS 05801172401 WHITIS 408-000000-115001-00000 WHITIS 4489 LAKEWOOD BLVD AMT NET VCHR DISC 40.99 0.00 CHECK NO 20040853 588894 VENDOR 169770 14631 158170 PARTS JENNINGS ARCHITECTURAL HARDWARE 001-122240-652987-00000 1 CHECK NO 303594 589261 VENDOR 900030 JILL M. BROWN 8/26-27 TRVL JILL M BROWN 8/26-27 TRVL JILL M. BROWN 470-173410-640300-00000 PAGE 86 VCHR NET 40.99 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 626.41 46.87 0.00 46.87 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 46.87 293.89 0.00 293.89 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 293.89 197.20 0,00 197.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 197.20 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 20.00 0.00 23.60 0.00 23.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 825.00 0.00 825.00 0.00 825.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 19.86 0.00 19.86 0.00 19.86 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 1 PAGE VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 VCHR NET 23.60 CHECK NO 20040313 589142 VENDOR 327630 - JIM & SLIM'S TOOL SUPPLY 725225 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-641950-00000 158775 LADDER RACK 0.00 0.00 239.00 12.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 251.98 251.98 CHECK NO 589079 20040878 83093 200637 7/29-8/28 20040878 83091 200637 7/25-8/24 20040878 81095 200637 7/25-7/31/02 VENDOR 292620 - JM TODD, INC. 001-000000-142500-00000 001-000000-142500-00000 001-000000-142500-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 308.61 210.49 145.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 308.61 210.49 145.07 20040878 83097 200637 7/29-8/28 001-000000-142500-00000 0.00 295.55 0.00 295.55 20040878 83082 200637 7/25-8/24 001-000000-142500-00000 0.00 248.13 0.00 248.13 20040878 83095 200637 7/29-8/28 001-000000-142500-00000 0.00 255.39 0.00 255.39 20040878 83092 200637 7/25-8/24 001-000000-142500-00000 0.00 242.08 0.00 242.08 20040475 83428 202348 7/26-8/25 001-121810-634999-00000 0.00 384.44 0.00 384.44 20040878 83096 200637 7/29-8/28 001-000000-142500-00000 0.00 126.91 0.00 126.91 20040878 83088 200637 7/31-8/24/02 001-000000-142500-00000 0.00 602.03 0.00 602.03 20040474 83427 200915 7/26-8/25 001-121810-634999-00000 0.00 271.00 0.00 271.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,089.70 CHECK NO 20040926 589228 VENDOR 360900 - JOBBERS EQUIPMENT 107099 521-122410-764990-00000 158776 GREASE PUMP 0.00 749.00 0.00 749. O0 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 588762 20040995 798199 159102 20040306 795430 159063 20040306 795429 159063 20040879 787140 200146 20040306 795578 159063 VENDOR 10160 - JOHN COLLINS AUTO PARTS. INC. 408-253221-652990-00000 AUTO PARTS PARTS/RETURN PARTS/RETURN PARTS PARTS/RETURN AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 PAGE 88 VCHR NET 749. O0 CHECK NO 589180 20040268 02324806 203343 PARTS/RETURN/CREDIT 20040995 02318056 203372 PARTS 20040281 01855494 203372 PARTS 20040269 02002072 203427 PARTS 20040268 02314607 203343 PARTS/RETURN/CREDIT 20040281 01926104 203372 PARTS 20040871 02318057 203445 PARTS 20040268 02312785 203343 PARTS/RETURN/CREDIT 20040854 02307451 158241 CEMENT DONUT 0.00 351.45 0.00 351.45 109-182901-652990-00000 0.00 109-182901-652990-00000 0.00 109-182901-652990-00000 0.00 109-182901-652990-00000 0.00 0.00 VENDOR 348490 - JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 109-182901-646311-00000 111-163646-646311-00000 0.00 111-163646-646311-00000 0.00 150-162545-646311-00000 0.00 109-182901-646311-00000 0.00 111-163646-646311-00000 0.00 40.00- 0.00 40.00- 357.92 0.00 357.92 7.95 0.00 7.95 188.08 0.00 188.08 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 865.40 317.65- 0.00 317.65- 61.16 0.00 61.16 12.60 0.00 12.60 280.49 0.00 280.49 317.65 0.00 317.65 118.16 0.00 118.16 408-253212-655100-00000 0.00 109-182901-646311-00000 0.00 001-122240-646311-00000 0.00 478.56 0.00 478.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.20 0.00 50.20 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040267 02284872 203429 PARTS 20040281 02284873 203372 PARTS 20041172 02335072 158281 PARTS 20040325 02323285 203343 PARTS 20040281 02052935 203372 PARTS 20040281 01811422 203372 PARTS 20040281 01832015 203372 PARTS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 160-162518-646311-00000 0.00 111-163646-646311-00000 0.00 001-126334-646314-00000 0.00 109-182901-646311-00000 0.00 111-163646-646311-00000 0.00 111-163646-646311-00000 0.00 111-163646-646311-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040832 589064 VENDOR 285810 - JOHN FERRELL 8/18-22 TRVL J.FERRELL 8/18-22 TRVL $.FERRELL 123-155972-640300-34640 0.00 123-155974-640300-44600 0.00 123-155960-640300-33060 0.00 CHECK NO 589314 VENDOR 900040 - JOHN HAY 303511 03005953602 J HAY J HAY 619 98TH AVE N 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303607 589315 VENDOR 900040 - JOHN K STEINHAUER 03000346800 J STEINHAUER 408-000000-115001-00000 J STEINHAUER 512 93RD AVE N CHECK NO 303512 589316 VENDOR 900040 - JOHN MANDERSCH 06102465602 J MANDERSCH 408-000000-115001-00000 J MANDERSCH 1920 ESTEY AVE AMT NET VCHR DISC 296.50 0.00 7.74 0.00 1 PAGE 89 VCHR NET 296.50 7.74 224.05 0.00 224.05 284.00 0.00 284.00 30.24 0.00 30.24 42.35 0.00 42.35 15.12 0.00 15.12 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.35 109.77 18.24 0.00 1,901.17 188.36 0.00 91.17 0.00 91.17 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 104.64 0.00 104.64 0.00 104.64 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 29.08 29.08 0.00 29,08 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 188.36 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AJ'iT DISC CHECK NO 20041174 589241 VENDOR 362600 - JOHN P. LANDI, MD W DOMKE 6/27/02 001-155930-631210-00000 159957 W DOMKE 6/27/02 CHECK NO 303513 589317 VENDOR 900040 - JOHN PINTER 05711421302 J PINTER J PINTER 270 W NAOMI DR #1 408-000000-115001-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 91.17 CHECK NO 303514 589318 VENDOR 900040 - JOHN R RICCI 05036886902 J RICCI J RICCI 3390 CERRITO CT 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 318.50 0.00 318.50 CHECK NO 20041122 20041122 588812 VENDOR 108280 - JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. 0207250101 201285 SVS 001-122240-639963-00000 0207250091 201285 SVS 001-122240-639963-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 318.50 0.00 235.42 0.00 235.42 CHECK NO 20040444 20040840 20040E~40 20040444 20040444 588921 105273 202571 106055 202571 105763 202571 104959 202571 105518 202571 VENDOR 193480 - JONES CHEMICAL CAUSTIC SODA CAUSTIC SODA CAUSTIC SODA CAUSTIC SODA CAUSTIC SODA 408-253221-652310-00000 408-253221-652310-00000 408-253221-652310-00000 408-253221-652310-00000 408-253221-652310-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 235.42 0.00 78.53 0.00 78.53 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 78.53 0.00 688.29 0.00 688.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,433.03 0.00 6,433.03 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7,121.32 3,121.94 0.00 3,121.94 3,118.97 0.00 3,118.97 3,214.32 0.00 3,214.32 3,268.42 0.00 3,268.42 3,075.18 O. O0 3,075.18 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO ~ DISC CHECK NO 303463 589414 VENDOR 900080 - JOSEPH LANGKAWEL AMB REF J LANGKAWEL 12/31 490-000000-116004-00000 AMB REF J LANGKAWEL 0207761-1 0.00 CHECK NO 589415 VENDOR 900080 - JOYCE G DENT 303464 AMB REF JOYCE DENT 5/9/01 AMB REF J DENT 0122068-1 490-000000-116004-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303608 589319 VENDOR 900040 - JOZEF KRIVICKA 03300549102 J KRIVICKA 408-000000-115001-00000 J KRIVICI~A 740 108TH AVE N 0.00 CHECK NO 20040445 589192 VENDOR 351470 - JP'S I_AWN CARE INC 1520 408-233352-634999-00000 204276 MAINT 8/02 0.00 CHECK NO 20040823 589187 VENDOR 350270 - JUAN R. SANCHEZ 8/1-29 I'RVL J.SANCHEZ 113-138936-640200-00000 8/1-29 TRVL J.SANCHEZ 0.00 CHECK NO 20040833 589068 VENDOR 285980 - JUANITA PANIAGUA 8/15-30 TRVL 3.PANIAGUA 111-156349-640200-00000 8/15-30 TRVL J.PANIAGUA 0.00 CHECK NO 303515 589320 VENDOR 900040 - JUDITH ANN & JOSEPH SACCUZZO 06007845601 SACCUZZO 408-000000-115001-00000 J ~CCUZZO 3304 DUCHESS DR 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 399.00 CHECK TOTAL 335.00 CHECK TOTAL 40.98 CHECK TOTAL 2,076.00 CHECK TOTAL 227.00 CHECK TOTAL 129.92 CHECK TOTAL 25.42 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 '~PAGE 91 VCHR NET 15,798.83 399.00 399.00 335.00 335.00 40.98 40.98 2.076. O0 2,076.00 227.00 227.00 129.92 129.92 25.42 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.42 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040827 DESCRIPTION 588763 VENDOR 10500 - JUDY SCRIBNER 8/5-28 TRVL J.SCRIBNER 8/5-28 TRVL J.SCRIBNER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO ~ DISC AMT NET 123-155972-640200-34640 0.00 123-155974-640200-44600 0.00 123-155960-640200-33060 0.00 123-155972-640300-34640 0.00 123-155974-640300-44600 0.00 CHECK NO 303516 589321 VENDOR 900040 - JULIA VASSALUZZO 04321374000 VASSALUZZO 408-000000-115001-00000 J VASSALUZZO 2350 CHESHIRE LN 0.00 CHECK NO 20041165 588970 VENDOR 233780 - KATHERINE DAVENPORT 8/10-9/28 SWIM LESSONS 111-156313-634999-00000 200990 8/10-9/28 SWIM LESSONS 0.00 CHECK NO 303609 589322 VENDOR 900040 - KATHERINE WALL 04914276801 K WALL 408-000000-115001-00000 K WALL 6545 AUTUMN WOODS DR 0.00 CHECK NO 20040842 589130 VENDOR 322300 - KATHLEEN CASEY 8/3-9/5/02 YOGA 111-156380-634999-00000 201010 YOGA 8/3-9/5/02 0.00 CHECK NO 303602 589386 VENDOR 900050 - KATHRYN COMISA REFUND PARKS-COMISA 111-156390-347940-00000 COMISA REFUND PARKS 0.00 CHECK NO 20040480 589235 VENDOR 362100 - KAY CAMPBELL E PREYSS 9/02 RENT E PREYSS 9/02 RENT 001-155930-634153-00000 0.00 4.18 2.78 9.86 70.18 69.18 CHECK TOTAL 230.90 CHECK TOTAL 682.50 CHECK TOTAL 31.08 CHECK TOTAL 300.30 CHECK TOTAL 20.00 CHECK TOTAL 450. O0 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 92 VCHR NET 156.18 156.18 230.90 230.90 682.50 682.50 31.08 31.08 300.30 300.30 20.00 20.00 450.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 303517 589323 VENDOR 900040 06602367202 K MASON K MASON 4010 IVY LN KEITH MASON 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040263 588891 VENDOR 168380 KELLEY FOX 8/29 205910 8/29 CHEERLEADING 130-157710-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040303 588765 VENDOR 15143 158751 FLAGS 10690 KELLY BLUEPRINTERS 101-163630-653900-00000 16J 1 CHECK NO 20040283 588989 VENDOR 248720 Y2918502 159588 RENTAL KELLY TRACTOR 322-183825-644600-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303518 589324 VENDOR 900040 KENCO DEVELOPMENT INC 04730884200 KENCO DEV 408-000000-115001-00000 KENCO DEV 14551 INDIGO LAKES CIR AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 303610 589325 VENDOR 900040 KENNETH OKOLSKI 07801273301 K OKOLSKI 408-000000-115001-00000 K OKOKLSKI 118 CAPRI BLVD VCHR NET 450.00 CHECK NO 303519 589326 VENDOR 900040 04902743501 K SMITH K SMITH 5345 JAEGER RD KEVIN & PAMELA SMITH 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 104.12 0.00 104.12 0.00 16.32 0.00 16.32 0.00 110.98 0.00 110.98 0.00 553.02 0.00 553.02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 156.27 357.50 0.00 357.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 357.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 553.02 900.00 0.00 900.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 900.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 110.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16.32 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 104.12 PAGE 93 156.27 0.00 156.27 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040296 20040296 20040296 20040296 20040296 588923 3922100 202174 PARTS 3944300 202174 PARTS 3817500 202174 PARTS 3919700 202174 PARTS 4007400 202174 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 194110 - KILPATRICKTURF EQUIPMENT 521-122410-646425-00000 AMT DISC 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040485 588820 VENDOR 113430 - KING ROOFING SERVICE. INC. REF 2002080467 KING ROOF 113-138900-322110-00000 KING ROOFING REF 2002080467 0.00 CHECK NO 20040839 20040839 20040839 20040874 20040874 20040839 20040839 20040839 588766 428238 203830 428871 203830 429069 203830 223783 204235 224319 204235 428518 203830 429251 203830 428678 203830 VENDOR CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE MASONRY MAT'L MASONRY MAT'L CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE 10900 - KREHLING INDUSTRIES 301-120402-762200-80196 301-120402-762200-80196 301-120402-762200-80196 301-120402-762200-80196 301-120402-762200-80196 301-120402-762200-80196 301-120402-762200-80196 301-120402-762200-80196 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 81.84 124.20 299.90 248.40 50.60- CHECK TOTAL 199.00 CHECK TOTAL 559.87 314.15 209.89 816.68 955.24 559.87 683.30 1,366.60 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 81.84 124.20 299.90 248.40 50.60- 703.74 199.00 199.00 559.87 314.15 209.89 816.68 955.24 559.87 683.30 1.366.60 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040880 588905 VENDOR 179430 KYLE CONSTRUCTION. INC. 22-100 109-182901-762200-00000 206550 INSTALL SEWER SVS 0.00 CHECK NO 20040693 589225 VENDOR 360580 CS14432 206446 MAINT L3 COMMUNICATIONS 001-122240-646970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303520 589327 VENDOR 900040 LANCE MURDOCK 04604625600 L MURDOCK L MURDOCK 4489 SILVER FOX DRIVE 408-000000-115001-00000 CHECK NO 20040482 589151 VENDOR 333840 342-00M #18 204317 #18 LANDERS & PARSONS 470-173410-634999-00000 ART NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 303611 589328 VENDOR 900040 LANE & MELISSSA STRUMLAUF 05102164703 L STRUMLAUF 408-000000-115001-00000 L STRUMLAUF 6742 MILL RUN CIR 1.680.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040443 588933 VENDOR 201990 LANGHAM CONSULTING SERVICES 2002119 301-121125-634999-01017 206788 CONSULTING SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20040995 588911 VENDOR 183340 383283 201969 SURVEY STAKES LARC. INC. 101-163620-652990-00000 1,845.75 O. O0 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 5,465.60 1.680.00 1,680.00 1.845.75 1.845.75 0.00 57.05 0.00 57.05 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 57.05 0.00 87.50 0.00 87.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 87.50 O.OO 72.40 0.00 72.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 72.40 4.578.43 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 4,578.43 4.578.43 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 957.24 0.00 957.24 0.00 957.24 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 303612 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 589329 VENDOR 900040 - LARRY & LUCINDA KEESEY 04505904502 L KEESEY 408-000000-115001-00000 L KEESEY 495 CHATHAM CIR AMT DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 303474 303473 303475 589387 REFUND PARKS- CHAPLIN REFUND PARKS CHAPLIN REFUND PARKS- CMAPLIN REFUND PARKS CHAPLIN REFUND PARKS- CMAPLIN REFUND PARKS CHAPLIN VENDOR 900050 - LAUREL CHAPLIN 111-156395-347290-00000 0.00 111-156395-347290-00000 0.00 111-156395-347290-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040481 588943 VENDOR 212390 - LAUREL RIDGE APARTMENTS R WHITE 8/02 RENT 001-155930-634153-00000 R WHITE 8/02 RENT 0.00 CHECK NO 303521 589330 VENDOR 900040 - LAUREN MAXWELL 04809940402 L MAXWELL 408-000000-115001-00000 L MAXWELL 5831 CINZANO CT 0.00 CHECK NO 589185 VENDOR 349920 - LAW ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL 20040606 4033573486 413-263611-631400-73949 203837 TO 8/2/02 0.00 CHECK NO 589230 20041111 PP #25 PP #25 VENDOR 361110 - LAW OFFICE OF ERSKINE AND FLEISHER 001-000000-218900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588851 VENDOR 135200 - LAWN EQUIPMENT CENTER AMT NET 82.26 CHECK TOTAL 150.00 75.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 399.50 CHECK TOTAL 74.59 CHECK TOTAL 9,176.25 CHECK TOTAL 286.75 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 82.26 82.26 150.00 75.00 75.00 300.00 399.50 399.50 74.59 74.59 9,176.25 9,176.25 286.75 286.75 SEPTEHBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040304 51664 159586 CHAIN SAW 20040305 51546 159067 BLOWER 20040326 21117 200406 REPAIR CHAINSAW COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182901-652910-00000 0.00 109-182901-652910-00000 0.00 109-182901-652990-00000 0.00 109-182901-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303522 589331 VENDOR 900040 - LAWRENCE & ELLE KOKESH SR 08016661700 L KOKESH SR 408-000000-115001-00000 L KOKESH SR 8329 OCOTILLO CT 0.00 CHECK NO 303613 589332 VENDOR 900040 - LAWRENCE PISTORI 03002353700 L PISTORI 408-000000-115001-00000 L PISTORI 770 95TH AVE N 0.00 CHECK NO 20040309 589221 VENDOR 360040 - LE CHATEAU ENTERPRISES GROUP, INC. 1688-02 159510 CREOLE SVS 681-421190-634402-00000 681-421510-640200-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041163 20041163 20041163 20041163 20041163 588767 VENDOR 11110 - LEE CO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 20195-154756 8/30 111-163646-643100-00000 20195-154756 8/30 20195-154733 8/20 760-162711-643100-00000 20195-154733 8/20 20195-154735 8/29 001-156363-643100-00000 20195-154735 8/29 20195-144932 8/2-9/3 198-157430-643100-00000 20195-144932 8/2-9/3 20195-154730 8/29 101-163630-643100-00000 20195-154730 8/29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 275.96 423.96 61.88 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 18.66 CHECK TOTAL 33.66 CHECK TOTAL 650.00 23.20 CHECK TOTAL 45.03 3,894.83 1,205.87 289.18 880.50 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 P~e VCHR NET 275.96 423.96 106.88 806.80 18.66 18.66 33.66 33.66 673.20 673.20 45.03 3,894.83 1,205.87 289.18 880.50 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041163 20041163 20041163 20041163 20041163 20041163 20041163 DESCRIPTION 20195-137263 8/2-9/3 20195-137263 8/2-9/3 20195-153415 7/26-8/27 20195-153415 7/26-8/27 20195-154732 8/23 20195-154732 8/23 20195-99360 8/2-9/3 20195-99360 8/2-9/3 20195-153068 8/27 20195-153068 8/27 20195-99668 9/4 20195-99668 9/4 20195-171307 7/22-8/21 20195-171307 7/22-8/21 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-061010-643100-00000 0.00 111-163646-643100-00000 0.00 111-156332-643100-00000 0.00 001-061010-643100-00000 0.00 111-156334-643100-00000 0.00 001-061010-643100-00000 0.00 101-163630-643100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303489 303487 303488 589388 REF 2002023684 LENNAR FAM LENNAR FAM REF 2002023684 REF 2002081385 LENNAR FAM LENNAR FAM REF 2002081385 REF 2001111689 LENNAR FAM LENNAR FAM REF 2001111689 VENDOR 900050 - LENNAR FAMILY OF BUILDERS 113-000000-115420-00000 0.00 113-000000-115420-00000 0.00 113-000000-115420-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040293 20040294 588768 VENDOR 8887 201993 SOD 8906 200235 SOD 11240 - LEO'S SOD & LANDSCAPING 408-253212-646314-00000 0.00 408-253212-646314-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040872 588808 VENDOR 105260 - LESCO SERVICE CENTER 2B2W83 109-182901-652990-00000 159589 GLOVES 0.00 AMT NET 1,736.07 5.13 6,803.14 1,852.92 26.42 20.64 0.21 CHECK TOTAL 450.00 36.08 9.12 CHECK TOTAL 79.80 39.95 CHECK TOTAL 41.10 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -~1 PAGE 98 VCHR NET 1,736.07 5.13 6,803.14 1,852.92 26.42 20.64 0.21 16,759.94 450.00 36.08 9.12 495.20 79.80 39.95 119.75 41.10 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040995 20040995 20040478 20040477 588882 30HOR7 157953 FERTILIZER 30GZE9 157996 SUPPLIES 2B2VZ1 159387 FERTILIZER W-2BA194 159802 LABOR/SVS VENDOR 165410 - LESCO SERVICE CENTER 408-233352-652310-00000 AMI NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 41.10 0.00 143.50 0.00 143.50 CHECK NO 20040295 408-253212-652990-00000 0.00 75.10 0.00 75.10 CHECK NO 303490 303493 303496 303494 303491 303492 303495 111-156332-652310-00000 0.00 111-156332-634999-00000 0.00 589203 VENDOR 354030 - LIBERTO OF FLORIDA INC 4079083-00 495-192370-652990-00000 204949 SUPPLIES LIBERTY ALUMINUM CO AL ALUMINUM AL ALUMINUM AL ALUMINUM AL ALUMINUM AL ALUMINUM 113-138900-322110-00000 113-138900-322110-00000 113-138900-322110-00000 113-138900-322110-00000 113-138900-322110-00000 113-138900-322110-00000 113-138900-322110-00000 282.60 0.00 282.60 302.30 0.00 302.30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 803.50 0.00 109.47 0.00 109.47 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 109.47 0.00 29.00 0.00 29.00 0.00 25.50 0.00 25.50 589389 VENDOR 900050 - REF 2002023402 LIBERTY REF 2002023402 LIBERTY REF 2002023184 LIBERTY REF 2002023184 LIBERTY REF 2002022878 LIBERTY REF 2002022878 LIBERTY REF 2002022865 LIBERTY REF 2002022865 LIBERTY REF 2002023403 LIBERTY REF 2002023403 LIBERTY REF 2002023182 LIBERTY REF 2002023182 LIBERTY REF 2002022860 LIBERTY REF 2002022860 LIBERTY AL ALUMINUM 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 39.50 0.00 39.50 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 AL ALUMINUM 194.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040883 20040883 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 589169VENDOR 343480 - LILIANA CARRENDER 8/29/02 3.5 HRS 681-431590-634402-00000 CARRENDER 8/29/02 3.5 HRS 8/28/02 2.5 HRS 681-421190-634402-00000 CARRENDER 8/28/02 2.5 HRS AMT DISC 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303614 589333 VENDOR 900040 - LINDSEY LACAVA 05029641201 L LACAVA 408-000000-115001-00000 L LACAVA 3812 VALENTIA WAY 0.00 CHECK NO 20040873 589163 VENDOR 340920 - LINE i COMMUNICATIONS, INC. CCEM 9/02 118-144210-641210-33781 202891 9/02 0.00 CHECK NO 303472 303471 589390 VENDOR 900050 - LISA TAYLOR REFUND PARKS-TAYLOR REFUND PARKS TAYLOR REFUND PARKS-TAYLOR REFUND PARKS TAYLOR 111-156395-347290-00000 111-156395-347290-00000 0.00 0,00 CHECK NO 303604 303605 589391 VENDOR 900050 - LISETrE VILLANUEP~A REFUND ADOPT-L VILLANERA 001-155410-346410-00000 L VILLANUEPu~ REFUND ADOPT REFUND ADOPT-L VILLANERA 610-155410-346450-00000 L VILLANUERA REFUND ADOPT 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303523 589334 VENDOR 900040 - LOGAN MORSE 06602245502 L MORSE L MORSE 5898 WESTBOURGH CT 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 AMI' NET 56.00 40.00 CHECK TOTAL 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 57.93 CHECK TOTAL 30.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 20.00 20.00 CHECK TOTAL 36.52 16J 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 56. O0 40.00 96.00 30.00 30.00 57.93 57.93 30.00 30.00 60.00 20.00 20.00 40.00 36.52 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 36.52 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 589335 VENDOR 900040 - LOLA & ROBERT ARENA 303524 04013932401 L ARENA 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 L ARENA 1281 SILVERSTRAND DR CHECK NO 303525 589336 VENDOR 900040 - LONG BAY PARTNERS LLC 04720021300 LONG BAY PRTN 408-000000-115001-00000 LONG BAY PA, RTNERS 15923 ROSETO WAY CHECK NO 303526 589337 VENDOR 900040 - LONGSHORE LAKE HOMES 04630902500 LONGSHORE LK 408-000000-115001-00000 LONGSHORE LK 10830 FULMAR CT AJqT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 303527 589338 VENDOR 900040 - LOUIS J & VALERIE G RAMSBURG 04500622902 L RAJ~SBURG 408-000000-115001-00000 L P,~MSBURG 112 CORAL VINE DR 7.32 0.00 CHECK NO 20041118 588878 PP #25 PP #25 VENDOR 164110 - LOYAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO 001-000000-218400-00000 CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 303528 589339 VENDOR 900040 - LUKAS BI~AUNSCHWEILER 06310317701 L BRAUNSCHWEI 408-000000-115001-00000 BP, AUNSCHWEILER 1749 YORK ISLAND DR 0.00 CHECK NO 20040690 589242 VENDOR 362660 - LUMIGENT TECHNOLOGIES AIkAQ3857 001-121148-764950-00000 001-121148-641950-00000 206971 LOG EXPL SERVEE 1 .PAGE 101 VCHR NET 7.32 7.32 0.00 92.97 0.00 92.97 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 92.97 0.00 149.99 0.00 149.99 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 149.99 0.00 18.66 0.00 18.66 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 18.66 0.00 208.09 0.00 208.09 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 208.09 0.00 12.91 0.00 12.91 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 12.91 0.00 6.645.25 0.00 10.00 0.00 6.655.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6.655.25 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 303498 303497 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 589392VENDOR 900050 - LYNETTE VANDER WENDE REFUND ADOPT-L VANDERWEND 610-155410-346450-00000 L VANDERWEND REFUND AI)OPT REFUND ADOPT-L VANDERWEND 001-155410-346410-00000 L VANDERWEND REFUND ADOPT AMT DISC 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 303597 589262 VENDOR 900030 - LYNN R. THORPE 8/29 TRVL LYNN THORPE 313-163611-640300-00000 8/29 TRVL LYNN THORPE '~AGE 102 CHECK NO 20040692 20040692 20040692 589216 1176 206943 LABOR/MATERIALS 1174 206943 LABOR/MATERIALS 1175 206943 LABOR/MATERIALS VENDOR 350480 - MADE IN RIO, INC. 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 VCHR NET 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 CHECK NO 303499 589393 VENDOR 900050 - MADELINE M O'HARA REFUND ADOPT-M O'HAP~A 001-156110-347110-00000 M O'MARA - REFUND ADOPT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 20040995 588937 VENDOR 206040 - MADER ELECTRIC MOTOR & CONTROL 1209201-01 441-256110-655100-00000 159096 PARTS 0.00 64.00 0.00 64.00 CHECK NO 20040848 588999 VENDOR 254880 - MAIL BARCODING SERVICES OF #711 001-000000-141400-00000 159931 TAJ)/LABEL MAIL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 64.00 0.00 382.64 0.00 382.64 0.00 1,933.84 0.00 1,933.84 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,616.48 0.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.00 0.00 397.91 0.00 397.91 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 397.91 0.00 96.65 0.00 96.65 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 96.65 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK NO 589050 VENDOR 280100 - MAIL STATION COURIER 20040288 19502 201907 SVS 8/1-15/02 113-138312-641950-00000 0.00 20040290 19420 200945 8/1-15/02 408-233351-649990-00000 408-233352-649990-00000 408-233312-649990-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040266 589181 VENDOR 348640 - MANIFEST FUNDING SERVICES 106555706 101-163612-644650-00000 203435 9/02 0.00 CHECK NO 20040860 20040694 588802 VENDOR 100800 - MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 30049267 001-122240-639967-00000 158272 TEMPS 30041937 001-122240-639967-00000 206970 TEMPS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040470 20040857 20040470 20040470 20040855 20040470 20040470 589066 30067275 207032 TEMPS 30066108 159942 TEMPS 30065026 207032 TEMPS 30060032 207032 TEMPS 30063938 158563 TEMPS 30062929 207032 TEMPS 30066106 207032 TEMPS VENDOR 285890 - MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 001-010510-634999-00000 001-155910-634999-00000 001-010510-634999-00000 001-010510-634999-00000 001-155910-634999-00000 001-010510-634999-00000 001-010510-634999-00000 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 105.67 105.67 105.66 CHECK TOTAL 705.52 CHECK TOTAL 764.80 1,468.80 CHECK TOTAL 729.33 524.40 695.52 772.80 524.40 637.56 724.50 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAtE 103 VCHR NET 30.00 317.00 347.00 705.52 705.52 764.80 1,468.80 2,233.60 729.33 524.40 695.52 772.80 524.40 637,56 724.50 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040857 30068371 159942 TEMPS 20040472 30069634 201189 TEMPS 20040859 30062932 158562 TEMPS 20040472 30068366 201189 TEMPS 20040858 30061208 158560 TEMPS 20040470 30061206 207032 TEMPS 20040856 30065029 158564 TEMPS 20040470 30063936 207032 TEMPS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155910-634999-00000 0.00 408-210151-634999-00000 0.00 001-155910-634999-00000 0.00 408-210151-634999-00000 0.00 001-155910-634999-00000 0.00 001-010510-634999-00000 0.00 001-155910-634999-00000 0.00 001-010510-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589028 VENDOR 267060 - MARCIA GALLE 20040473 8/19-27/02 204320 8/19-27/02 111-156395-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040292 588769 VENDOR 11590 - MARCO ACE I-LqRDWARE 233710 200871 SUPPLIES 20040292 233735 200871 SUPPLIES 20040292 233853 200871 SUPPLIES 001-156363-652990-00000 001-156363-652990-00000 001-156363-652990-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040494 588841 VENDOR 127090 - MARCO OFFICE SUPPLY 208160682 681-410510-651110-00000 201337 SUPPLIES 0.00 AMT NET 52.44 347.76 485.07 318.78 419.52 772.80 524.40 743.82 CHECK TOTAL 195.66 CHECK TOTAL 2.99 9.68 14.25 CHECK TOTAL 4.97 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 52.44 347.76 485.07 318.78 419.52 772.80 524.40 743.82 8,273.10 195.66 195.66 104 2.99 9.68 14,25 26.92 4.97 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040498 2008090590 200455 SUPPLIES 20040494 208160643 201337 SUPPLIES 20040499 208120581 201608 SUPPLIES 20040843 208210612 204567 SUPPLIES 20040488 208200659 203513 SUPPLIES 20040497 208210719 200636 SUPPLIES 20040493 208090606 201427 SUPPLIES 20040499 207310632 201608 SUPPLIES 20040843 208290642 204567 SUPPLIES 20040484 208210682 159557 TONER 20041164 208230598 203443 SUPPLIES 20041169 208280555 159708 SUPPLIES 20041167 208210565 159801 SUPPLIES 20040487 208200585 203516 SUPPLIES 20040756 208200514 206817 SUPPLIES 20040843 208260580 204567 SUPPLIES 20040847 110040615 154463 CHAIR DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 113-138312-651110-00000 0.00 681-410510-651110-00000 0.00 001-157110-652990-00000 0.00 408-233352-651110-00000 0.00 111-156381-651110-00000 0.00 001-000000-142500-00000 0.00 111-138911-651110-00000 0.00 001-157110-652990-00000 0.00 408-233352-651110-00000 0.00 001-100130-651110-00000 0.00 408-210130-651110-00000 0.00 408-233351-651110-00000 0.00 001-121140-651110-00000 0.00 001-156363-651110-00000 0.00 130-157710-651110-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 408-233352-651110-00000 0.00 198-157430-651930-00000 0.00 AMT NET 498.28 244.59 153,22 110.31 69.90 143.94 11.60 245.02 58.07 79.00 328.00 0.00 50,00 59,80 42.80 3,549.57 49.95- 85.74 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 P~GE 105 VCHR NET 498.28 244.59 153.22 110.31 69.90 143.94 11.60 245.02 58.07 79.00 328.00 50.00 59.80 42.80 3,549.57 49.95- 85.74 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040483 208080517 200860 SUPPLIES 20041168 110080510 201812 SUPPLIES 20041166 208230586 157260 PAPER 20040486 208150504 204603 SUPPLIES 20040495 208160645 201332 SUPPLIES 20040489 208190572 203442 SUPPLIES 20040499 207310621 201608 SUPPLIES 20040845 208230562 159787 GUEST CHAIRS 20040492 208120606 201723 SUPPLIES 20040496 208210575 201205 SUPPLIES 20040499 208140638 201608 SUPPLIES 20040495 208160686 201332 SUPPLIES 20040491 208210718 202085 SUPPLIES 20040499 206250532 201608 SUPPLIES 20040490 208200534 202343 SUPPLIES 20040499 208140726 201608 SUPPLIES 20040844 208190610 203443 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-210151-651110-00000 0.00 001-122310-651110-00000 0.00 111-156380-651110-00000 0.00 111-156395-651110-00000 0.00 681-431310-651110-00000 0.00 408-233351-651110-00000 0.00 001-157110-652990-00000 0.00 198-157410-651930-00000 0.00 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 470-173435-651110-00000 0.00 001-157110-652990-00000 0.00 681-431310-651110-00000 0.00 001-454010-651110-00000 0.00 001-157110-652990-00000 0.00 301-121125-651110-01017 0.00 001-157110-652990-00000 0.00 408-210130-651110-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 498.45 0.00 1 VCHR NET 498.45 140.25 0.00 140.25 80.10 0.00 80.10 93.49 0.00 93.49 130.51 0.00 130.51 622.70 0.00 622.70 764.40 0.00 764.40 498.66 0.00 498.66 205.33 0.00 205.33 73.08 0.00 73.08 329.85 0.00 329.85 270.49 0.00 270.49 191.92 0.00 191.92 47.88 0.00 47.88 305.40 0.00 305.40 119.80 0.00 119.80 ~AGE 106 15.93 0.00 15.93 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040495 DESCRIPTION 208160683 201332 SUPPLIES 20040490 208190632 202343 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-431310-651110-00000 0.00 301-121125-651110-01017 0.00 CHECK NO 303500 303501 589394 VENDOR 900050 - MARGARET BEARD REFUND ADOPT-M BEARD M BEARD REFUND ADOPT 001-155410-346410-00000 REFUND ADOPT-M BEARD M BEARD REFUND ADOPT 610-155410-346450-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040884 20040884 20040884 20040884 588834 VENDOR 122850 - MARIA G. DELASHMET 8/26/02 6 HRS DELASHMET 8/26/02 6 HRS 681-421190-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 8/27/02 6.5 HRS DELASHMET 8/27/02 6.5 HRS 681-421190-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 8/29/02 4 HRS DELASHMET 8/29/02 4 HRS 681-421190-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 8/28/02 5.5 HRS DELASHMET 8/28/02 5.5 HRS 681-421190-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 CHECK NO 589217 VENDOR 358810 - MARIA PIA GOOCH 20040882 8/27/02 3 HRS 681-421190-634402-00000 GOOCH 8/27/02 3 HRS 0.00 CHECK NO 589416 VENDOR 900080 - MARIAN C SHERMAN 303468 AMB REF M SHERMAN 3/30/02 490-000000-116004-00000 AMB REF M SHERMAN 0217566-1 0.00 AMT NET 1.28 247.86 CHECK TOTAL 20.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 96.00 0.00 56.00 48.00 64.00 0.00 40.00 48.00 CHECK TOTAL 48.00 CHECK TOTAL 375.12 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 ~JAGE 107 VCHR NET 1.28 247.86 10,322.24 20.00 30.00 50.00 96.00 104.00 64.00 88.00 352.00 48.00 48.00 375.12 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 303469 589417 VENDOR 900080 - MARIE MULLER AMB REF MARIE MULLER 1/11 AMB REF M MULLER 0208946-1 490-000000-116004-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041042 588844 VENDOR 130890 - MARILYN NORRIS 3/28-8/28 TRVL M.NORRIS 001-156110-640300-00000 3/28-8/28 TRVL M.NORRIS 0,00 CHECK NO 20040449 20040449 589232 VENDOR 361620 - MARINA MIKES, INC. 004972 206740 BOAT & MOTOR 109-182901-764400-00000 004972 159585 SHPG/FILING FEE 109-182901-634999-00000 109-182901-649010-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303532 589340 VENDOR 900040 - MARK SERENA 05502396601 M SERENA M SERENA 4409 ROBIN AVE 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303529 589341 VENDOR 900040 - MARK TATLER 05711133701 M TATLER M TATLER 745 CROSSFIELD CIR 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040324 20040302 588936 VENDOR 204680 - MARKING DEVICES 89228 159757 DATE STAMPER 001-421030-647110-00000 89170 158678 DATERS 101-163609-652990-00000 101-163609-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 14. O0 CHECK TOTAL 49.79 CHECK TOTAL 4,393.00 150.00 125.00 CHECK TOTAL 55.01 CHECK TOTAL 195.43 CHECK TOTAL 35.13 52.88 3.25 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 108 VCHR NET 375.12 14.00 14.00 49.79 49.79 4,393.00 275.00 4,668,00 55.01 55.01 195.43 195.43 35.13 56.13 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040312 589240 VENDOR 362580 - MARTIN AIRCONDITIONING, INC. 1259 001-122240-652997-00000 158240 TEST/BALANCE FEES 0.00 CHECK NO 303533 589342 VENDOR 900040 - MARY ANN GIBSON 03902666601M GIBSON 408-000000-115001-00000 M GIBSON 104 INAGUA LN 0.00 CHECK NO 303615 589343 VENDOR 900040 - MARY MEDII%A 08101327603 M MEDINA M MEDINA 1229 SKYLINE DR 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303530 589344 VENDOR 900040 - MARY WILLIAMS 04627520601M WILLIAMS M WILLIAMS 1957 CRESTVIEW WAY #1 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303634 303635 589395 VENDOR 900050 - MARYANN CALERO REFUND PARKS-M CALERO 111-156381-347911-00000 REFUND PARKS-M CALERO REFUND P~,RKS-M CALERO 111-000000-208901-00000 REFUND PARKS-M CALERO 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041102 589108 PP /f25 PP #25 VENDOR 312600 - MARYLAND CHILD SUPPORT ACCOUNT 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041171 588960 VENDOR 224910 - MASUNE COMPANY 820508 111-156349-652720-00000 158496 SUPPLIES 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 600.00 CHECK TOTAL 114.55 CHECK TOTAL 8.38 CHECK TOTAL 53.66 CHECK TOTAL 80.00 4.80 CHECK TOTAL 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 94.30 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 91.26 109 600.00 600.00 114.55 114.55 8.38 8.38 53.66 53.66 80.00 4.80 84.80 100.00 100.00 94.30 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040291 588977 VENDOR 238850 - MBC FASTENERS 7633 202420 PARTS 408-233352-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040322 20039139 20038655 20040322 20040315 20040315 20040262 20038655 20039139 20038655 20040318 20040316 20040317 588777 171259 205920 SUPPLIES 169348 206474 SUPPLIES 171038 206134 SUPPLIES 171196 205920 SUPPLIES 171523 206143 SUPPLIES 171207 206143 SUPPLIES 171319 206149 SUPPLIES 171143 206134 SUPPLIES 169666 206474 SUPPLIES 171131 206134 SUPPLIES 171562 205914 SUPPLIES 171573 206134 SUPPLIES 171607 206073 SUPPLIES VENDOR 12200 - MCCONNELLS TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 521-122410-646425-00000 001-172930-652990-0D000 001-122240-652987-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 111-156332-652910-00000 111-156332-652990-00000 111-156332-652910-00000 111-156332-652990-00000 001-156363-652990-D0000 001-122240-652990-00000 001-172930-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 408-253212-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 408-233352-652910-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 236.40 CHECK TOTAL 16.15 17.95 8.19 5.57 0.00 26.12 0.00 36.12 13.47 5.53 14.52 58.38 25.34 11.23 131.94 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 110 VCHR NET 94.30 236.40 236.40 16.15 17.95 8.19 5.57 26.12 36.12 13.47 5.53 14.52 58.38 25.34 11.23 131.94 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040316 171503 206134 20038655 171311 206134 20035650 171094 205920 20038655 171025 206134 20038808 170619 206474 20041177 170914 159920 20038655 171009 206134 20040316 171629 206134 20040317 170795 206073 20035650 170835 205920 20040318 171306 205914 20040322 171396 205920 20040316 171473 206134 20039139 169799 206474 20035650 170942 205920 20035650 170881 205920 20040315 171626 DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 001-172930-652990-00000 0.00 001-155410-652990-00000 0.00 001-155410-652910-00000 O.OO 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 408-233352-652910-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 408-253212-652990-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-172930-652990-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 111-156332-652910-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 19.78 0.00 1 PAGE 111 VCHR NET 19.78 13.30 0.00 13.30 4.18 0.00 4.18 50.86 0.00 50.86 8.99 0.00 8.99 13.28 32.39 0.00 45.67 10.52 0.00 10.52 17.56 0.00 17.56 40.45 0.00 40.45 37.44 0.00 37.44 20.94 0.00 20.94 7.19 0.00 5.39 0.00 8.99 0.00 7.19 5.39 8.99 15.98 14.38 0.00 14.38 22.36 0.00 22.36 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 206143 SUPPLIES 20038655 171243 206134 SUPPLIES 20040323 171070 200275 SUPPLIES 20040320 171322 206075 SUPPLIES 20040315 171146 206143 SUPPLIES 20040315 171145 206143 SUPPLIES 20040262 171300 206149 SUPPLIES 20040316 171468 206134 SUPPLIES 20039139 170465 206474 SUPPLIES 20038655 171344 206134 SUPPLIES 20040315 171524 206143 SUPPLIES 20040315 171605 206143 SUPPLIES 20040262 171340 206149 SUPPLIES 20038655 171251 206134 SUPPLIES 20040315 171102 206143 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 113-138915-652990-00000 0.00 408-210130-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 111-156332-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 001-156363-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-172930-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 111-156332-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 111-156332-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 001-156363-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 111-156332-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 AMT NET 12.72 0.45 20.00 12.49 0.00 3.92 0.00 20.65 18.44- 16.69 3.58 14.10 0.00 38.51 0.00 47.98 89.02 0.83 0.00 19.13 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 28.70 0.45 20.00 12.49 112 3.92 20.65 18.44- 16.69 3.58 14.10 38.51 47.98 89.02 0.83 19.13 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040262 171224 206149 SUPPLIES 20040262 171336 206149 SUPPLIES 20040314 171015 206275 SUPPLIES 20040314 171197 206275 SUPPLIES 20040315 171234 206143 SUPPLIES 20040262 171430 206149 SUPPLIES 20040315 171117 206143 SUPPLIES 20038807 1711268 206474 SUPPLIES 20038655 171138 206134 SUPPLIES 20040316 171455 206134 SUPPLIES 20040360 171193 206274 SUPPLIES 20038655 171350 206134 SUPPLIES 20040317 171282 206073 SUPPLIES 20040320 171516 206075 SUPPLIES 20040322 171633 205920 SUPPLIES 20040322 171296 205920 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156363-652990-00000 0.00 001-156363-652990-00000 0.00 111-156381-652990-00000 0.00 111-156381-652990-00000 0.00 111-156332-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 001-156363-652990-00000 0.00 111-156332-652910-00000 0,00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 001-172930-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 408-233352-652910-00000 0.00 408-210130-652910-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 25.27 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 25.27 11.69 0.00 11.69 33.63 0.00 33.63 1.48 0.00 0.00 18.04 0.00 1.48 18.04 31.90 0.00 31.90 0.00 51.57 0.00 51.57 29.23 0.00 29.23 6.91 0.00 6.91 36,01 0.00 36.01 11.77 0.00 11.77 9.51 0,00 9.51 113 22.72 0.00 22.72 67.45 0.00 67.45 1.25 0.00 1.25 12.08 0.00 12.08 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040318 171658 205914 SUPPLIES 20040322 171223 205920 SUPPLIES 20035650 170912 205920 SUPPLIES 20041177 171637 159920 SUPPLIES 20040316 171409 206134 SUPPLIES 20039139 169256 206474 SUPPLIES 20040315 171305 206143 SUPPLIES 20038655 171109 206134 SUPPLIES 20040316 171273 206134 SUPPLIES 20035650 170872 205920 SUPPLIES 20040319 171346 206076 SUPPLIES 20035650 170863 205920 SUPPLIES 20040316 171458 206134 SUPPLIES 20040317 171417 206073 SUPPLIES 20035650 171013 205920 SUPPLIES 20035650 170985 205920 SUPPLIES DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-253212-652990-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0,00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 001-155410-652990-00000 0.00 001-155410-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-172930-652990-00000 0.00 111-156332-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 408-233352-652910-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 41.44 0.00 VCHR NET 41.44 17.23 0,00 17,23 2.67- 0.00 10.57 13.50 0.00 2.67- 24.07 16.10 0.00 16.10 104.30 0.00 104.30 9.89 19.38 0.00 3.23 0.00 4.43 0.00 2.67 0.00 0.44 0.00 29.27 3.23 4,43 2.67 0.44 35.00 0.00 35.00 58.92 0.00 58.92 6.10 0,00 4.04 0.00 6,10 4.04 10.80 0.00 10.80 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040315 171561 206143 SUPPLIES 20040262 171612 206149 SUPPLIES 20040315 171499 206143 SUPPLIES 20040317 171301 206073 SUPPLIES 20040319 171627 206076 SUPPLIES 20040322 171462 205920 SUPPLIES 20038656 170822 205999 SUPPLIES 20038655 171206 206134 SUPPLIES 20040324 171415 200948 SUPPLIES 20038655 171360 206134 SUPPLIES 20040316 171450 206134 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156332-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 001-156363-652990-00000 0.00 111-156332-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 408-233352-652910-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 470-173442-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 101-163620-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589222 VENDOR 360280 - MCI 20039993 08685439485 8/19 08685439485 8/19 113-138900-641900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040311 20040310 589149 VENDOR 333500 - MCKESSON GENERAL MEDICAL CORP. 166623 490-144610-652720-00000 158849 BANDAIDS 325761 490-144610-652710-00000 157570 ELECTRODES 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 0.00 3.48 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 33.94 0.00 3.85 0.00 2.52 0.00 9.89 0.00 PAGE 115 VCHR NET 348 0.50 33.94 3.85 2.52 9.89 26.60 0.00 26.60 8.52 0.00 8.52 12.53 0.00 12.53 5.16 0.00 5.16 26.14 0.00 26.14 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,855.13 12.78 0.00 12.78 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 12.78 0.00 94.80 0.00 94.80 0.00 70.08 0.00 70.08 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040448 589212 VENDOR 357710 - MCLAUGHLIN TOURISM MANAGEMENT #2 194-101540-634999-00000 205790 PROF SVS 0.00 CHECK NO 20040289 588862 VENDOR 144810 - MCMASTER-CARR 58969779 202421 PARTS 408-233352-652910-00000 16J 1 CHECK NO 303465 303467 303466 589418 AMB REF EVELYN AMES 3/26/ AMB REF E AMES 0217101-1 AMB REF R PYLE 6/19/02 AMB REF R PYLE 0224720-1 AMB REF B KUTLER 7/2/02 AMB REF B KUTLER 0225725-1 VENDOR 900080 - MEDICARE PART B/FINANCIAL SVS DEPT 490-000000-116004-00000 490-000000-116004-00000 490-000000-116004-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 303461 589396 VENDOR 900050 - MERCEDES CHAVEZ REFUND PARKS-M CHAVEZ 111-156390-347990-00000 REFUND PARKS- M CHAVEZ PAGE 116 CHECK NO 20040716 588708 VENDOR 194880 - METRO DADE POLICE 99-3790 001-013010-649040-00000 AND VCHR NET 164.88 CHECK NO 20040717 588709 VENDOR 194880 - METRO DADE POLICE 99-3561 001-013010-649040-00000 AND 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 79.83 0.00 79.83 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 79.83 0.00 250.23 0.00 250.23 0.00 221.60 0.00 221.60 0.00 243.98 0.00 243.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 715.81 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 0.00 63.00 0,00 63.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 63.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.00 0.00 21.00 0.00 21.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO ANT DISC CHECK NO 20040719 588710 VENDOR 194880 - METRO DADE POLICE 99-3381 001-013010-649040-00000 AND 16J 1 CHECK NO 20040720 588711 VENDOR 194880 - METRO DADE POLICE 99-3368 001-013010-649040-00000 AND AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 588953 20041119 PP #25 PP ~25 VENDOR 218750 - METROPOLITAN LIFE 001-000000-217700-00000 001-000000-217710-00000 001-000000-217720-00000 001-000000-217730-00000 PAGE 117 CHECK NO 589345 VENDOR 900040 - MICHAEL RYAN 303535 06632487902 M RYAN M RYAN 6123 THRESHER DR 408-000000-115001-00000 VCHR NET CHECK NO 303534 589346 VENDOR 900040 - MICHALE & LINDA HOLLOWAY 04800676502 M HOLLOk~AY 408-000000-115001-00000 M HOLLOWAY 9611 LITCHFIELD LN 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 CHECK NO 303503 303502 589397 VENDOR 900050 - MICHELE LOMELI REFUND ADOPT-M LOMELI 610-155410-346450-00000 M LOMELI REFUND ADOPT REFUND ADOPT-M LOMELI 001-155410-346410-00000 M LOMELI REFUND ADOPT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 CHECK NO 589132 VENDOR 323000 - MICHELLE DORALUS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.00 0.00 3,113.70 0.00 388.35 0.00 629.04 0.00 189.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,320.09 4,320.09 0.00 40.99 0.00 40.99 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40.99 0.00 9.32 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9.32 9.32 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040881 8/26/02 4 HRS DORALUS 8/26/02 4 HRS 20040881 8/28/02 2.5 HRS DORALUS 8/28/02 2.5 HRS 20040881 8/27/02 5 HRS DORALUS 8/27/02 5 HRS 20040881 8/29/02 3 HRS DORALUS 8/29/02 3 HRS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041176 20041176 588778 VENDOR 12710 - MIDWEST TITLE GUARANTEE 40151 313-163673-631650-60012 206863 TITLE COMM 40150 313-163673-631650-60012 206863 TITLE COMM 16, J AMT NET VCHR DISC 32.00 32.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040691 589226 VENDOR 360840 - MIKE SCHWAB CABINETS, INC. FINAL-STORAGE UNIT 301-522010-764550-01019 206477 FINAL-STORAGE UNIT 8.00 32.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303470 589419 VENDOR 900080 - MILDRED NORTON AMB REF M NORTON 6/23/02 490-000000-116004-00000 AMB REF M NORTON 0224974-1 80.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589019 VENDOR 264410 - MILER TRONICS 20040846 90202MT 200365 MAINT 9/02 495-192370-634999-00000 48.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589189 VENDOR 350580 - MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT ~PAGE i18 VCHR NET 64.00 40.00 80.00 48.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 232.00 0.00 260.00 0.00 260.00 0.00 260.00 0.00 260.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 520.00 13,680.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 13,680. O0 13,680. O0 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 709.50 0.00 709.50 0.00 709.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 445.00 0.00 445.00 0.00 445.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041106 PP #25 PP #25 DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AHT DISC 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040284 20040286 20040285 589006 VENDOR 256580 - MINOLTA CORPORATION C081599417 202254 7/02 408-233312-646710-00000 C081599408 201536 7/02 001-155230-646710-00000 C081599502 201722 7/02 111-156349-646710-00000 16, J AMT NET VCHR DISC 109.66 0.00 PAGE 119 CHECK NO 20040850 589128 VENDOR 321760 - MINOTTI'S PIZZA 8/16/02 202898 PIZZA 8/16/02 130-157710-652210-00000 VCHR NET 109.66 CHECK NO 20041098 588993 PP #25 PP #25 VENDOR 250350 - MISDU 001-000000-218810-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 109.66 CHECK NO 20040476 589256 VENDOR 363140 - MODERN POSTCARD POSTCARDS 198-157410-647110-00000 159785 POSTCARDS 0.00 61.69 0.00 61.69 CHECK NO 20040287 588898 VENDOR 172350 - MOTION INDUSTRIES FL42-553713 408-233352-655100-00000 201420 PARTS 0.00 23.50 0.00 23.50 CHECK NO 588988 VENDOR 248480 - MOTOROLA - SOUTHEAST PCC 20041170 W0463776 490-144610-646610-00000 158392 REPAIRS 0.00 180.95 0.00 180.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 266.14 0.00 368.00 0.00 368.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 368.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 80.00 0.00 561.00 0.00 561.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 561.00 0.00 14.57 0.00 14.57 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14.57 0.00 36.00 0.00 36.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 120 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041170 W0452791 158392 REPAIRS 20041170 W0449068 158392 REPAIRS ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 490-144610-646610-00000 0.00 490-144610-646610-00000 0.00 AMI' NET 36.00 36.00 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 36.00 36.00 108.00 CHECK NO 303531 589347 VENDOR 900040 - MS VAN ARSDALE 06302513201 MS VANARSDALE 408-000000-115001-00000 VANARSDALE 3193 LAKEVIEW DR 0.00 135.86 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 135.86 135.86 CHECK NO 20041175 20041175 589008 VENDOR 257030 - MULLER-THOMPSON FUNERAL CHAPEL B PHILLIPS 8/18/02 001-155930-634150-00000 159971 B PHILLIPS 8/18/02 D REINHOLD 8/10/02 001-155930-634150-00000 159971 D REINHOLD 8/10/02 0.00 0.00 300.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 300.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 600.00 CHECK NO 20040479 588779 VENDOR 12960 - MUNICIPAL CODE CORP DEV CODE BOOKS 111-138317-654110-00000 159855 CODE BOOKS 0.00 225.00 0.00 225.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 225.00 CHECK NO 589137 VENDOR 323870 - MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING, INC. 20040447 92083 205093 CABINET SYSTEM 368-116360-652991-80604 0.00 4,858.00 0.00 4,858.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,858.00 CHECK NO 589398 VENDOR 900050 - MYRA BZDIL 303504 REFUND ADOPT-M BZDIL M BZDIL REFUND ADOPT 001-155410-346410-00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 303505 REFUND ADOPT-M BZDIL M BZDIL REFUND ADOPT 610-155410-346450-00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 588850 VENDOR 134940 - N & N ASSOCIATES, INC. SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040252 6469 202030 MAINT. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC 408-233312-652410-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040656 20040656 588831 VENDOR 118880 - N/~BORS, GIBLIN, & NICKERSON, P.A. 001-00000-9968 GTS 001-010520-631100-00000 206953 LEGAL SERVICES 2/02/02 001-00000-10181GTS 001-010520-631100-00000 206953 LEC~AL SERVICES 3/02/02 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041187 589200 VENDOR 353390 - NANCY JENSEN-NAUFEL 5/9-6/4/02 G.G PRESCHOOL 111-156395-634999-00000 5/9-6/4/02 G.G PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTION CHECK NO 20041086 588780 VENDOR 13080 - NAPLES ARMATURE WORKS 66943 001-172930-652990-00000 206852 SUPPLIES AMI' NET VCHR DISC 66.67 0.00 CHECK NO 20041126 20041126 20041154 20041153 589011 T-2376 J PEREZ O0-802-CFA CERT OF COSTS 8/02 CERT OF COSTS 8/02 8964 S.PEAVY 02-O00777-CF-O-FGB T-2788 J,EMMANUEL 99-1857-CFA VENDOR 259460 - [~APLES COURT REPORTING, INC. 681-410310-633010-00000 681-410310-633010-00000 681-410310-633032-00000 681-410310-633021-00000 ~AGE 121 VCHR NET 66.67 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 66.67 4,894.76 0.00 CHECK NO 20040236 588782 VENDOR 2072461/001230 159782 AD 13300 - NAPLES DAILY NEWS 001-100130-647110-00000 1,837.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4.894.76 1,837.50 6,732.26 0,00 256.75 0,00 256.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 256.75 0.00 30.53 0.00 30.53 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 30.53 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 14,635.00 0.00 14,635.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 33.00 0.00 33.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14,737.00 0.00 292.80 0.00 292.80 SEPTEHSER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040451 2081800 206186 NON ADVERTISING 20040647 2073803/055786 207054AD 20040451 2084301/001230 206186 NON ADVERTISING 20040451 2081798/053926 206186 NON ADVERTISING 20040645 1045346 48 WEEK 159821 RENEWAL 20040451 2077665/001230 206186 NON ADVERTISING 20040451 2084299/001230 206186 NON ADVERTISING 20040451 2084302/001230 206186 NON ADVERTISING 20040236 2073401/050126 159782 AD 20040451 2081801/053926 206186 NON ADVERTISING 20040451 2084303/001230 206186 NON ADVERTISING 20040649 2084402/057522 206393 NOTICE 20040451 2084298/001230 206186 NON ADVERTISING 20040451 2081799/053926 206186 NON ADVERTISING 20040451 2081802/053926 206186 NON ADVERTISING 20040641 2077677/027354 159593 LEGAL AD 20040451 2084300/001230 206186 NON ADVERTISING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 001-100130-647110-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 101-163612-654110-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 001-100130-647110-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 126-138332-649100-35000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 111-138911-649100-00000 0.00 113-138312-649100-00000 0.00 AMT NET 585.60 3,636.60 172.56 585.60 130.00 90.92 177.27 164.71 105.50 585.60 192.97 65.80 200.82 585.60 585.60 198.96 156.86 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 122 VCHR NET 585.60 3. 636.60 172.56 585.60 130.00 90.92 177.27 164.71 105.50 585.60 192.97 65.80 200.82 585.60 585.60 198.96 156.86 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC CHECK NO 20040658 20040658 589015 VENDOR 261100 - NAPLES FIRE SPRINKLER. INC 502-692-C 414-263611-634999-74023 206588 LABOR 502-736-S 414-263611-634999-74023 206588 LABOR 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041084 588897 VENDOR 172110 - NAPLES FUNEP~AL HOME 8/28 J.LOPEZ-ROIS 001-155930-634150-00000 201871 8/28 J.LOPEZ-RIOS PAGE 123 CHECK NO 20040245 588928 VENDOR 197570 - NAPLES GP~APHICS & PRINTING, INC. 40034 517-121640-647110-00000 159726 NEWSLETTER FOR AUGUST 16J 1' CHECK NO 20040937 588917 VENDOR 190280 - NAPLES INTENAGENCY COUNCIL MEP~ DUES-SVS FOR SENIORS 123-155972-654210-34640 159890 MEMBERSHIP-SVS FOR SENIORS AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8.513.77 CHECK NO 20041083 588814 VENDOR 108550 - NAPLES MEDICAL CENTER 8/27 H. ROBINSON 001-155930-652810-00000 159972 8/27 H.ROBINSON 7,330.50 CHECK NO 20040650 20040650 20040650 589123 02-9873 D. POWELL 201043 02-9873 D. POWELL 00-6202 Q. BROWN 201043 00-6202 O. BROWN 02-10370 D. POWELL 201043 SERVICE 02-10370 D. POWELL VENDOR 319080 - NAPLES SAFARI ANIMAL HOSPITAL 610-155410-631970-00000 610-155410-631970-00000 610-155410-631970-00000 2,475.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7,330.50 0.00 2,475.0O 0.00 9,805.50 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0,00 75.00 0.00 75,00 0.00 102.00 0.00 102.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 102.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 674.14 O. O0 674.14 O. O0 674.14 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 660.00 0.00 660.00 0,00 660.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041080 20041080 DESCRIPTION 02-10244 G.ARBOLEDA 201043 02-10244 G.ARBOLEDA 02-10469 J.BESSERY 201043 02-10469 J.BESSERY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040653 588866 VENDOR 150000 8/1/02-8/31/02 202616 SOFTBALL NAPLES SCOREKEEPERS ASSOCIATION 111-156341-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040251 588880 VENDOR 164860 117140 200919 SERVICE NAPLES TRUCK ACCESSORIES 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040253 589220 VENDOR 359990 190 206264 P/~RTS NAPLES TRUCK P/~RTS 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040660 589025 VENDOR 266020 8/28 4HRS 6:30-10:30 8/28 4HRS 6:30-10:30 NATASHA A. CULAR 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040644 588913 VENDOR 186070 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 015042747 M. HONDZINSKI 001-157110-649010-00000 159529 NOTARY LICENSE 0.00 CHECK NO 20040709 588810 VENDOR 105610 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP CONF 632210173-001 SWEET 408-210151-654360-00000 159179 REG-HEATHER SWEET 0.00 AMT NET 75.00 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 440.00 CHECK TOTAL 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 664.40 CHECK TOTAL 64.00 CHECK TOTAL 39.00 CHECK TOTAL 395.00 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 124 1 VCHR NET 75.00 45.00 335.00 440. O0 440. O0 50.00 50.00 664.40 664.40 64.00 64.00 39.00 39.00 395.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 395.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 589032 20040237 20040237 20040237 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 109-182901-644600-00000 109-182901-652990-00000 109-182901-644600-00000 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 272820 - NATIONS RENT OF FLORIDA, INC. 36-1036478 159583 RENT EQUIPMENT 36-1036478 159583 CONCRETE BLADE 400088850 159583 CREDIT RETURN AMT DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589202 20041112 PP #25 PP#25 VENDOR 354000 - NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS 001-000000-217001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040603 20040603 589074 VENDOR 289160 - NATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. J02-174-03 RETAINAGE 325-000000-205100-00000 205168 TO 8/13/02 RETAIItAGE J02-174-03 325-172921-634999-31005 205168 TO 8/13/02 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041082 588860 VENDOR 143900 - NCH/CPR FUND 071102-2 159989 STUDENT FOR HEARTSAVER CPR 113-138312-654360-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040244 589047 VENDOR 277900 - NEW URBAN NEWS I16912 111-138317-654110-00000 159057 RENEWAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20041078 20040893 589070 VENDOR 286930 - NEXTEL 449727417 7/15-8/14 202302 449727417 7/15-8/14 608547417 7/15-8/14 200555 608547417 7/15-8/14 408-233313-641700-00000 001-144510-641700-00000 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 58.00 9.00 58.00- CHECK TOTAL 32.801.87 CHECK TOTAL 70.65- 706.54 CHECK TOTAL 36.00 CHECK TOTAL 69.00 CHECK TOTAL 151.92 63.79 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 125 1 VCHR NET 58.00 9.00 58.00- 9.00 32,801.87 32,801.87 70.65- 706.54 635.89 36.00 36.00 69.00 69.00 151.92 63.79 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040892 DESCRIPTION 453175418 7/15-8/14 202303 453175418 7/15-8/14 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233312-641700-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041103 589227 PP ~(25 PP #25 VENDOR 360850 - NIAGARA COUNTY SCU 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303476 589348 VENDOR 900040 - NICHOLAS MATURO 04603129000 NICHOLAS MATU 408-000000-115001-00000 11741 NIGHT HERON DR. NICHOLAS MATUR 0.00 CHECK NO 20040894 20040894 20040894 20040894 20040894 589105 VENDOR 310560 - NORA SEHEULT 8/28 2HRS 8:30-10:30 8/28 2HRS 8:30-10:30 8/27 5HRS 8:30-2:30 8/27 5HRS 8:30-2:30 8/26 3.5HRS 8:30-12:00 8/26 3.5HRS 8:30-12:00 8/29 4 1/4HRS 8:00-12:15 8/29 4 1/4HRS 8:00-12:15 8/29 4 1/4HRS 11:00-1:25 8/29 4 1/4HRS 11:00-1:25 681-421190-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 681-421190-634402-00000 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303674 589349 VENDOR 900040 - NORMAN & DOROTHEA COTE 05102763301 NORMAN & DORO 408-000000-115001-00000 6903 MILL POND CIR. NORMAN & DOROTHE 0.00 CHECK NO 20040652 588783 VENDOR 14060 - NORTH COLLIER ANIMAL CLINIC 02-9810 R.WILLIAMS 610-155410-631970-00000 201049 02-9810 R.WILLIAMS 0.00 AMT NET 278.47 CHECK TOTAL 70.00 CHECK TOTAL 8.04 CHECK TOTAL 32.00 80.00 56.00 48.00 20.00 CHECK TOTAL 223.84 CHECK TOTAL 75.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 126 VCHR NET 278.47 494.18 70.00 70.00 8.04 8.04 32.00 80.00 56. O0 48.00 20.00 236.00 223.84 223.84 75. O0 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041079 DESCRIPTION 02-10564 D. MCKNIGHT 201049 02-10564 D.MCKNIGHT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040651 20040651 20040651 20040651 589141 02-10015 K.TAUB 201052 02-10015 K.TAUB 01-9040 M.GISPAN 201052 M.GISPAN 02-10464 C.VANDERZEE 201052 02-10464 C. VANDERZEE 02-10267 D.BANKSTON 201052 02-10267 D.BANKSTON VENDOR 326790 - NORTH htAPLES VETERINARY HOSPITAL 610-155410-631970-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 15.00 0.00 VCHR NET 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 90.00 CHECK NO 20040246 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK NO 20041128 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303677 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 589080 VENDOR 292860 - NORTH STAR TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. 6000 001-121141-652910-00000 159560 BYPASS SWITCH 589214 VENDOR 357870 - NORTHLAND INSURANCE COMPANIES WC CLAIMS 518-121630-645928-00000 205772 WC CLAIMS 75.00 0.00 75.00 589350 VENDOR 900040 - NPB LIMITED LLC 02700100001 NPB LIMITED 408-000000-115001-00000 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD NPB LIMITED LL CHECK NO 589351 VENDOR 900040 - NTC DEV 303481 04530107100 NTC DEV 6171ASHWOOD LN. NTC DEV 408-000000-115001-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 245.00 0.00 415.00 0.00 415.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 415.00 9,726.65 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,742.32 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,726.65 9.726.65 1,742.32 CHECK NO 589352 VENDOR 900040 - NTC DEVELOPMENT LTD 1,742.32 0.00 36.57 0.00 36.57 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 36.57 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 303478 DESCRIPTION 04526857500 NTC DEVELOPME 6127 MANSHESTER PL NTC DEVELOPMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041156 588876 VENDOR 162490 - OFFICE DEPOT 178354689 0010 206590 EQUIPMENT 408-233351-764360-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040243 588784 VENDOR 14140 - OFFICE FURNITURE & DESIGN 4187 101-163612-651930-00000 157018 EQUIPMENT 0.00 CHECK NO 20041101 589160 PP #25 PP #25 VENDOR 338800 - OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041157 20041157 589162 VENDOR 339380 - ONESOURCE 1146630 200073 CLEANING 1148483 200073 CLEANING 001-122220-634999-00000 001-122220-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041097 589127 PP #25 PP #25 VENDOR 321600 - ONONDAGA COUNTY SCU 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040469 588873 VENDOR 157710 - ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY INC. 437584618-01 111-156425-652990-00000 202399 DECORATIONS 0.00 AMT NET 39.16 CHECK TOTAL 2,499.99 CHECK TOTAL 342.50 CHECK TOTAL 267.86 CHECK TOTAL 62,878.57 771.00 CHECK TOTAL 14. O0 CHECK TOTAL 134.35 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 128 VCHR NET 39.16 39.16 2,499.99 2,499.99 342.50 342.50 267.86 267.86 62,878.57 771.00 63,649.57 14.00 14.00 134.35 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 134.35 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040254 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 589082 VENDOR 295210 - ORTINO ENTERPRISES 4574 313-163673-631990-62071 205795 SERVICE AMT DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20040655 20040655 588785 VENDOR 3814 206521 LABOR 3814 206521 LABOR 14380 - OVERDOORS OF FLORIDA 101-163624-763100-00000 0.00 101-163624-763100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303676 589353 VENDOR 900040 - PAGE L. HILAND 003300525900 PAGE L. HILA 408-000000-115001-00000 574 106TH AVE N.$PAGE L. HILAND 0.00 CHECK NO 588959 20041085 8/26 E. GERMAN 159973 8/26 E. GERMAN 20041085 8/30 H. VASQUEZ 159973 8/30 H.VASQUEZ VENDOR 224590 - PALM MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP. 001-155930-652810-00000 001-155930-652810-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589211 VENDOR 357700 - PASSARELLA AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 20040249 02CPR785 306-116360-649010-80611 205835 DOLPHIN COVE 0.00 CHECK NO 20040260 589144 VENDOR 330350 - PAT'S PUMP AND BLOWER 302951 521-122410-646425-00000 200696 PARTS 0.00 CHECK NO 589354 VENDOR 900040 - PATRICIA & JOHN SCHAWB AMT NET 35.00 CHECK TOTAL 7,740. O0 772.00 CHECK TOTAL 60.36 CHECK TOTAL 60.40 355.34 CHECK TOTAL 445. O0 CHECK TOTAL 256.50 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 pAGE 129 VCHR NET 35.00 35.00 7,740.00 772. O0 8.512. O0 60.36 60.36 60.40 355.34 415.74 445.00 445.00 256.50 256.50 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 303675 DESCRIPTION 05028867501 P SCHWAB 6132 TOWNCENTER CIR. P. SCHAWB COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303688 589399 VENDOR 900050 - PATRICIA M. LANKO REFUND-PARKS P.M LANKO 111-156380-347990-00000 REFUND P.M LANKO 0.00 CHECK NO 20040657 589012 VENDOR 259870 - PATRICK C. WEBER, P.A. 8/30/02 GUARDIANSHIP PROG 201382 GUARDIANSHIP PR~M 192-432515-631130-00000 192-432515-631990-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589263 VENDOR 900030 - PAUL LAVALLEE 303598 8/4-7 TRVL PAUL LAVALLEE 8/4-7 TRVL PAUL LAVALLEE 001-121148-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303480 589355 VENDOR 900040 - PEBBLE CREEK % I P M 02700412800 PEBBLE CREEK 408-000000-115001-00000 7576 PEBBLE CREEK IRR-EFF 0.00 CHECK NO 20040241 20040255 20040646 588986 1687 159091 BUSINESS CARDS 1689 204849 BUSINESS CARDS 1656 158112 BUS. CARDS VENDOR 247350 - PEDERSEN PRINTING 408-253212-647110-00000 001-000000-142900-00000 001-155910-647110-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040258 588869 VENDOR 152460 - PELUSO MOVERS INC. 11831 198-157410-634999-00000 200577 STORAGE 0.00 ANT NET 28.50 CHECK TOTAL 105.00 CHECK TOTAL 11,100.00 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 69.00 CHECK TOTAL 406.90 CHECK TOTAL 38.00 150.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 340.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 28.50 28.50 105.00 105.00 11,115.00 11.115.00 69.00 69.00 406.90 406.90 38.00 150.00 30.00 218.00 340.00 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040257 11906 200575 STORAGE 20040258 11315 200577 STORAGE COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 198-157430-634999-00000 0.00 198-157410-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040450 588877 VENDOR 163500 - PENINSULAR PAPER COMPANY 85330 101-163620-652990-00000 206977 WIPER-IND 0.00 CHECK NO 303485 589356 VENDOR 900040 - PETE SMITH INC. 05102766600 PETE SMITH IN 408-000000-115001-00000 2111 MISSION DR. PETE SMITH INC. CHECK NO 20040896 588946 VENDOR 214250 - PETER G. BOLTON 9/4/02 P. BOLTON 001-144510-649990-00000 159959 MEDICAL EXAM ~J4T NET VCHR DISC 200.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041161 20041162 20041159 20041162 20041159 20041159 20041162 589039 338033 200956 FUEL 343493 200956 FUEL 338036 200956 FUEL 343295 200956 FUEL 341902 200956 FUEL 341901 200956 FUEL 343179 200956 FUEL VENDOR 276020 - PETROLEUM TRADERS CORP. 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 VCHR NET 200.00 170.00 0.00 170.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 710.00 4.230.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,230.00 4,230.00 0.00 26.11 0.00 26.11 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 26.11 0.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 70.00 0.00 307.68 0.00 307.68 6.420.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,904.78 0.00 6.420.92 5.904.78 0.00 328.62 0.00 328.62 0.00 899.07 0.00 899.07 0.00 269.70 0.00 269.70 0.00 785.52 0.00 785.52 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041161 338791 200956 FUEL 20041162 342224 200956 FUEL 20041162 343494 200956 FUEL 20041162 341695 200956 FUEL 20041159 341044 200956 FUEL 20041161 338787 200956 FUEL 20041162 343497 200956 FUEL 20041161 339662 200956 FUEL 20041161 339764 200956 FUEL 20041161 338789 200956 FUEL 20041161 340688 200956 FUEL 20041161 339765 200956 FUEL 20041162 343183 200956 FUEL 20041159 338299 200956 FUEL 20041159 341435 200956 FUEL 20041159 341029 200956 FUEL 20041162 343420 200956 FUEL DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 4.044.38 0.00 3,119.93 0.00 3.107.00 0.00 1 PAGE 132 VCHR NET 4,044.38 3,119.93 3,107. O0 763.22 0.00 763.22 204.51 0.00 204.51 4,548.00 0.00 4.548.00 582.26 0.00 582.26 847.12 0.00 847.12 9.184.24 0.00 9,184.24 532.66 0.00 532.66 1,089.69 0.00 5,199.62 0,00 1,089.69 5,199.62 385.47 0.00 385.47 5,833.92 0.00 1.789.76 0.00 6,259.46 0,00 5,833.92 1,789.76 6,259.46 810.61 0.00 810.61 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041159 38036A 200956 FUEL 20041162 343496 200956 FUEL 20041162 341699 200956 FUEL 20041161 339663 200956 FUEL 20041161 338035 200956 FUEL 20041161 338096 200956 FUEL 20041161 338788 200956 FUEL 20041161 338336 200956 FUEL 20041162 343180 200956 FUEL 20041161 338097 200956 FUEL 20041161 338338 200956 FUEL 20041161 340689 200956 FUEL 20041161 338786 200956 FUEL 20041162 343294 200956 FUEL 20041162 341701 200956 FUEL 20041159 340577 200956 FUEL DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 5,904.78- 0.00 1,844.65 0.00 VCHR NET 5,904.78- 1,844.65 419.81 0.00 419.81 287.63 0.00 287.63 159.14 0.00 159.14 6,516.69 0.00 2,420.32 0.00 1,029.58 0.00 6,516.69 2,420.32 1,029.58 235.66 0.00 235.66 3,128.83 0.00 3,128.83 711.89 0.00 711.89 429.16 0.00 429.16 4,006.84 0.00 4,006.84 960.53 0.00 960.53 106.50 0.00 106.50 39.53 0.00 39.53 20041161 338060 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 2.638.49 0.00 2,638.49 200956 FUEL SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041161 338790 200956 FUEL 20041162 342222 200956 FUEL 20041159 341436 200956 FUEL 20041162 343182 200956 FUEL 20041162 341697 200956 FUEL 20041159 341030 200956 FUEL COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040247 588951 VENDOR 217960 - PHIL BURNHAM SUPPLY 530 408-253212-655200-00000 200242 HARDWARE 16J 1 CHECK NO 303479 589357 VENDOR 900040 - PHILIP J. SMITH 04501129101 PHILIP J. SMI 408-000000-115001-00000 91 JOHNNYCAKE DR. PHILIP J. SMITH AMT NET VCHR DISC 4,574.55 0.00 CHECK NO 303483 589400 VENDOR 900050 - PHOENIX HOMES REF 355044 PHOENIX HOMES REF 355044 OP~ANGETREE, INC. 113-000000-115420-00000 5,685.71 0.00 CHECK NO 303482 589401 VENDOR 900050 - PHYLLIS A. SIMPSON REF 354481 PHYLLIS A. SIM 113-000000-115420-00000 REF 354481 PHYLLIS A. SIMPSON PAGE 134 CHECK NO 588856 VENDOR 140310 - PHYSIO CONTROL VCHR NET 4,574.55 5,685.71 823.88 0.00 823.88 61.54 0.00 61.54 290.94 0.00 290.94 3,115.11 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,115.11 96,800.34 0.00 52.50 0.00 52.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 52.50 0,00 29.00 0.00 29,00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 29.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 50.00 5.00 5.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040659 IV988649 206703 SERVICE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 350-140470-764250-55125 0.00 CHECK NO 588715 VENDOR 357380 20040895 J. AUGUSTINE AUG 2002 AND PIERRE AURELIEN 001-155930-634153-00000 16J CHECK NO 20040239 588828 VENDOR 117020 PITNEY BOWES, INC. 404757/1931-4954-20-7 001-156110-644600-00000 159611 POSTAGE METER RENTAL A~FF NET VCHR DISC 27,257.57 0.00 CHECK NO 20040238 589030 VENDOR 271160 903627/1581-6384-86-9 201103 SUPPLIES PITNEY BOWES, INC. 408-210151-651110-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20040240 588787 VENDOR 15030 PLASTIC SPECIALTIES OF FL 8460 001-122240-652910-00000 158204 CLEAR LAXAN LIGHT COVERS 1 CHECK NO 589114 VENDOR 315440 20040248 51327234 205709 SUPPLIES PLUMBMASTER 001-122240-652995-00000 PAGE 135 CHECK NO 588955 VENDOR 222290 20039549 C071700868 206241 LASERJET POMEROY COMPUTER SERVICES 408-210151-764900-00000 408-253212-764900-00000 VCHR NET 27,257.57 CHECK NO 589358 VENDOR 900040 - PORT OF ISLAND CONST. 27.257.57 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 250.00 0.00 332.24 0.00 332.24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 332.24 0.00 482.95 0.00 482.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 482.95 0.00 540.00 0.00 540.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 540.00 0.00 251.71 0.00 251.71 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 251.71 500.00 1,174.75 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,674.75 1,674.75 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 303486 DESCRIPTION 05494474400 PORT OF ISLAN 0 RECREATION LN-TEMP PORT OF ISLAND COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041158 588687 VENDOR PERMIT #499 AND 15130 - POSTMASTER 408-210151-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041088 20041088 20041088 20041088 20041088 589248 163666 155319 SUPPLIES 183912 155319 SUPPLIES 163475 155319 SUPPLIES 182693 155319 SUPPLIES 165759 155319 SUPPLIES VENDOR 362920 - POWER SYSTEMS 111-156313-652910-00000 0.00 111-156313-652910-00000 0.00 111-156313-652910-00000 0.00 111-156313-652910-00000 0.00 111-156313-652910-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041081 20041081 20040467 589005 PJ339751/17196 201407 CYLINDER PJ339752/17196 201407 CYLINDER PJ338401 201040 MAINT. VENDOR 255770 - PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST.LLC 490-144610-652720-00000 0.00 490-144610-652720-00000 0.00 111-156332-646313-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041160 588875 VENDOR 159000 - PRECISION CLEANING INC. 6434 001-122240-646110-00000 206806 CLEANING 0.00 AMT NET 867.98 CHECK TOTAL 9,538.04 CHECK TOTAL 205.02 318.97 59.90 32.90 39.95 CHECK TOTAL 69.88 96.80 10.80 CHECK TOTAL 8.067.29 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAgE 136 VCHR NET 867.98 867.98 9,538.04 9,538.04 205.02 318.97 59.90 32.90 39.95 656.74 69.88 96.80 10.80 177.48 8,067.29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8,067.29 SEPTEHSER 11, 2002 REPORT 100~601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040468 20040468 20040256 588903 H 21031865 200698 PARTS 421182042 200698 PARTS 421182049 200698 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC VENDOR 174760 - PROCRAFT BATTERIES 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040242 589013 VENDOR 259910 - PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGIES S181835-000 113-138935-641900-00000 113-138935-641950-00000 159204 TELEPHONE FOR DENISE METCALF 16J CHECK NO 20041090 589124 VENDOR 320540 - PROLIME CORPORATION 7403 408-253211-634999-00000 200395 LIME SLUDGE AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 20041089 20041089 20041089 589138 VENDOR 325880 - PROSOURCE ONE 07715100 201467 FERTILIZER 07593200 201467 FERTILIZER 07715200 201467 FERTILIZER 111-163646-652310-00000 111-163646-652310-00000 111-163646-652310-00000 I ~ PAGE ! 137 VCHR NET 278.96 0.00 278.96 CHECK NO 20041155 20040250 588861 VENDOR 144550 · PYRAMID II JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 320203 408-233351-652510-00000 200767 SUPPLIES 319764 408-233351-652510-00000 200767 SUPPLIES 106.68 0.00 106.68 219.04 0.00 219.04 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 604.68 0.00 100.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 112.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 112.00 4,485.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 233.26- 0.00 4,485.00 4.485.00 233.26- 0.00 233.26 0.00 233.26 0.00 241.28 0.00 241.28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 241.28 0.00 8.25 0.00 8.25 0.00 53.56 0.00 53.56 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 61.81 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 588934 20040654 20040654 20040654 20040891 2OO4O891 20040891 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 202830 - QUICK KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES 001-122240-639965-00000 001-122240-639965-00000 001-122240-639965-00000 001-122240-639965-00000 001-122240-639965-00000 001-122240-639965-00000 12213 OVER PAID 201542 OVER PAID 121135 OVER PAID 201542 OVER PAID 12136 BALANCE DUE 201542 BALANCE DUE 12269 DISCOUNT 201542 SERVICE DISCOUNT 12269 201542 SERVICE 12331 201542 SERVICE AMT DISC 16J AJ,iT NET VCHR DISC 0.00 14.30- 0.00 0.00 2.73- 0.00 PAGE 138 VCHR NET CHECK NO 20041087 589194 VENDOR 352250 - QUICKSILVER RECYCLING SERVICES 1545 472-173430-634999-33821 204520 EQUIPMENT 14,30- CHECK NO 20040825 588963 VENDOR 229720 - P~AYMOND SMITH 8/19-22 TRVL R.SMITH 8/19-22 TRVL R.SMITH 114-178970-640300-00000 2.73- CHECK NO 20038990 20040627 589034 VENDOR 275110 - REDDY ICE CORPORATION 136425 408-210130-652990-00000 202246 ICE 130190 408-253212-652990-00000 200245 ICE 0.00 107.06 0.00 107.06 0.00 1.43- 0.00 CHECK NO 20040711 589246 VENDOR 362810 - RENAISSANCE CHICAGO WINONA STONE 9/15/02 001-101520-640300-00000 159745 W STONE 9/15/02 1.43- 0.00 57.20 0.00 57.20 0.00 106.80 0.00 106.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 252.60 1,294.02 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,294.02 1,294.02 7.00 7.00 0.00 534.30 0.00 534.30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 154.80 0.00 82.80 0.00 82.80 0.00 72.00 O.O0 72.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040956 588997 VENDOR 254040 13490377-001 200771 SUPPLIES RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION 408-233351-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303557 589402 VENDOR 900050 RICHARD E. STEPHENSON II R STEPHENSON 2002020177 113-138900-322110-00000 R STEPHENSON 2002020177 0.00 CHECK NO 20040028 588950 VENDOR 216270 RICHARDS PORTABLE WELDING SERVICE 8/17 MAKE SS 2-4 408-253221-634999-00000 203517 8/17 MAKE SS 2-4 0.00 CHECK NO 303564 589359 VENDOR 900040 ROBERT AND FLORA SEYDLITZ R&F SEYDLITZ 08110028600 408-000000-115001-00000 R&F SEYDLITZ 246 RIVERWOOD RD 0.00 CHECK NO 20040976 589009 VENDOR 257090 324858 2002040454 ROBERT ASBEL JR. LANDSCAPING 111-138911-634804-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303559 589360 VENDOR 900040 ROBERT AZOULEI R AZOULEI 06033939101 408-000000-115001-00000 R AZOULEI 5073 BERKELEY DR 0.00 CHECK NO 303561 589361 VENDOR 900040 R BRADY 06600861000 R BRADY 208 POTOMAC PL ROBERT BRADY 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 231.50 CHECK TOTAL 240.00 CHECK TOTAL 27.10 CHECK TOTAL 670. O0 CHECK TOTAL 283.27 CHECK TOTAL 44.64 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 AGE 139 VCHR NET 534.30 250.00 250.00 231.50 231.50 240.00 240.00 27.10 27.10 670.00 670.00 283.27 283.27 44.64 44.64 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 303580 DESCRIPTION 589420 VENDOR 900080 - ROBERT CURTIS R CURTIS AMB REF 3/2/02 R CURTIS AMB REF 3/2/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET 490-000000-116004-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20039004 589126 VENDOR 321350 - ROBERT GEORGE PRODUCTIONS INC. 00000216 495-192310-648170-00000 159511 CASSETTE TAPE HOLD MESSAGE 0.00 CHECK NO 20040945 588987 VENDOR 248090 - ROBICON HR298838 202678 REPAIR 408-253221-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20038979 589027 VENDOR 266940 - ROCHESTER MIDLAND CREATIVE CHEM 13450197 001-122220-652990-00000 200075 SANITIZING AND DEODERIZING 0.00 CHECK NO 588925 20039816 9/02 SUITE 102 200448 9/02 SUITE 102 20039816 9/02 2ND FLOOR 200448 9/02 2ND FLOOR 20039816 9/02 SUITE 104 200448 9/02 SUITE 104 VENDOR 196120 - ROGER CARVALLO 001-041010-644100-00000 001-041010-644100-00000 001-041010-644100-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 588941 VENDOR 211960 - ROLL-A-WAY 20040958 9/5 SHUTTERS 158413 SHUTTERS 408-233312-646970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589403 VENDOR 900050 - ROLLSECURE SHUTTERS 120.01 CHECK TOTAL 350.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,438.13 CHECK TOTAL 576.03 CHECK TOTAL 1,370.71 5,767.21 1,480.80 CHECK TOTAL 537.45 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 120.01 120.01 350.00 350.00 2,438.13 2,438.13 576.03 576,03 1,370,71 5,767.21 1,480.80 8,618.72 537.45 537.45 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 303556 ROLLSECURE 2002022349 ROLLSECURE 2002022349 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AffF DISC 113-138900-322110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303579 589421 VENDOR 900080 - ROMA WINGER R WINGER AMB REF 1/8/02 R WINGER AMB REF 1/8/02 490-000000-116004-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303558 589362 VENDOR 900040 - RON AND ANITA LUCAS R&A LUCAS 06002798802 408-000000-115001-00000 R&A LUCAS 1868 CROWN POINTE BLVD W 16J CHECK NO 303566 589363 VENDOR 900040 - SAR~J~ L TITUS S TITUS 04529857901 S TITUS 293 ~WC~RASS CT 408-000000-115001-00000 CHECK NO 303553 589404 VENDOR 900050 - SAP~AH LYMAN S LYMAN BOOK REFUND S LYMAN BOOD REFUND 001-156110-347110-00000 AMI' NET VCHR DISC 57.50 0.00 CHECK NO 20040957 20040959 588788 VENDOR 32594 158778 P~%RTS 32593 158777 P;%RTS 16520 · S~%RLO POWER MOWERS, INC. 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 PAG~ 141 VCHR NET 57.50 CHECK NO 303633 589405 VENDOR 900050 - SATORINI DEVELOPMENT LLC 355745 SATORINI CT 113-000000-115420-00000 355745 STORINI CT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 57.50 70.00 0.00 70.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 70.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 0.00 143.70 0.00 143.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 143.70 0.00 16.95 0.00 16.95 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 16.95 0.00 23.54 0.00 23.54 0.00 35.55 0.00 35.55 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 59.09 0.00 16.44. 0.00 16.44- CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16.44 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 588995 VENDOR 251530 - SCHENKEL SHULTZ, INC 2OO4O6O7 #2 206487 TO 8/10/02 301-120435-762200-52001 0.00 CHECK NO 20040952 589024 VENDOR 266010 - SCHWAB READY MIX INC 30094657 205260 READY MIX 20040952 30094547 205260 READY MIX 111-163645-653150-00000 111-163645-653150-00000 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 303563 589364 VENDOR 900040 - SCOTI' AND AMY ELLIS S&A ELLIS 07810885701 408-000000-115001-00000 S&A ELLIS 8413 BENT CREEK WAY 13,486.12 0.00 CHECK NO 303569 589424 VENDOR 900100 - SCOTT MCCARTHY S MCCARTHY R KIPP 001216 681-421190-634405-00000 S MCCARTHY R KIPP 001216 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20040954 20039610 20040953 20039610 20040955 20040954 588919 VENDOR 193330 - SCOTI' PAINT CORP. 090003395 201270 PAINT 090003021 200980 PAINT 090003154 200980 PAINT 090003047 200980 PAINT 090002534 201824 PAINT 090002299 201270 PAINT 001-122240-652999-00000 111-156332-652999-00000 111-156332-652999-00000 111-156332-652999-00000 408-253211-652990-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 1 IPAGE 142 VCHR NET 13,486.12 13.486.12 0.00 293.75 0.00 293.75 0.00 411.25 0.00 411.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 705.00 0.00 42.52 0.00 42.52 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 42.52 0.00 76.38 0.00 76.38 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 76.38 0.00 20.80 0.00 20.80 0.00 90.94 0.00 90.94 0.00 54.32 0.00 54.32 0.00 46.68 0.00 46.68 0.00 64.29 0.00 64.29 0.00 16.16 0.00 16.16 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040953 20040954 20040954 20040953 20040954 DESCRIPTION 090003142 200980 PAINT 090002629 201270 PAINT 090003337 201270 PAINT 090003155 200980 PAINT 090003352 201270 PAINT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156332-652999-00000 0.00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 111-156332-652999-00000 0.00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 16J 1' AMT NET VCHR DISC 89.07 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 89.07 140.84 0.00 140.84 5.69 0.00 5.69 8.92 0.00 8.92 42.72 0.00 42.72 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 580.43 CHECK NO 20040546 589254 VENDOR 363060 - SECRETARY OF STATE SUMMONS FOR C MCDONALD 516-121650-631990-00000 159837 SUMMONS FOR C MCDONALD 0.00 8.75 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8.75 8.75 CHECK NO 20040503 589075 VENDOR 290100 - SENIOR SOLUTIONS OF CCE CO-PAYS 8/6/02-8/27/0 123-000000-208400-00000 CCE CO-PAYS 8/6/02-8/27/02 0.00 298.00 0.00 298.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 298.00 CHECK NO 20041095 588846 VENDOR 133440 - SERVICE PAINTING OF FLORIDA 4012 495-192370-646970-00000 206359 PAINT FUEL FARM 0.00 19,254.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 19,254.00 19,254. O0 CHECK NO 20040939 588983 VENDOR 242720 - SETON C755927-01 152776 SUPPLIES 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 177.40 0.00 177.40 CHECK TOTAL O.O0 177.40 CHECK NO 20040504 588996 VENDOR 253100 - SEW SHORE 26031 158861 T SHIRTS FOR DEPT STAFF 518-121630-649990-00000 0.00 120.50 0.00 120.50 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040504 25864 158861 T SHIRTS FOR DEPT STAFF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 518-121630-649990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588789 VENDOR 20039582 172111 158235 LABOR 16700 - SEWELL DOOR CONTROL & GLASS 001-122240-646110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040947 589058 VENDOR 282410 - SHAMROCK PLUMBING & MECHANICAL INC 38324 201268 REPAIRS 20040947 38327 201268 REPAIRS 20040946 38320 201765 SVS 20040949 38342 201939 SVS 001-122240-652994-00000 0.00 001-122240-652994-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 412-273511-634999-70881 0.00 CHECK NO 589022 VENDOR 265590 - SFLARI FERGUSON 20040975 512 111-156341-634999-00000 201941 WEB SITE UPDATES 20040975 499 111-156341-634999-00000 201941 WEB SITE UPDATES 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303568 589406 VENDOR 900050 - SHERRIE MASSEY S MASSEY REFUND PARKS 111-156395-347290-00000 S MASSEY REFUND PARKS 0.00 CHECK NO 20040951 588790 VENDOR 5931-5 201267 PAINT 16910 - SHERWIN WILLIA~IS 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 AMT NET 66.00 CHECK TOTAL 105.00 CHECK TOTAL 4,337.69 470.00 1,330.00 200.96 CHECK TOTAL 675.00 125.00 CHECK TOTAL 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 69.99 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 66.00 186.50 105.00 105.00 4,337.69 470.00 1,330.00 200.96 6,338.65 675.00 125.00 800.00 60.00 60.00 69.99 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040950 3902-0 201267 PAINT 20040950 3641-4 201267 PAINT COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20039567 589152 VENDOR 333860 - SHORELINE FLOORING SUPPLIES 620945 001-122240-652990-00000 158211 EZ SKIDS CHECK NO 303562 589365 VENDOR 900040 - SIDNEY ROSE AND SON INC SIDNEY ROSE 07501061300 408-000000-115001-00000 SYDNEY ROSE 5462 MARTIN ST 0.00 51.51 0.00 51.51 CHECK NO 20040941 20040507 20040506 588791 VENDOR 16950 - SIGN CRAFT 19808 159026 INFO SIGNS 19159 157262 BANNERS FOR MOTORCYCLE EXPO 19806 157938 7 PLEX SIGNS 001-156363-646316-00000 130-157710-652990-00000 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 393.00 0.00 393.00 0.00 499.00 0.00 499.00 CHECK NO 20040035 20040035 588809 VENDOR 105270 - SIGNS OF NAPLES 5812 408-253212-634999-00000 200279 SUPPLIES 5790 408-253212-634999-00000 200279 SUPPLIES 0.00 325.00 0.00 325.00 0.00 362.50 0.00 362.50 CHECK NO 20039570 589238 VENDOR 362400 - SIGNS OF THE TIMES 605 113-138915-652990-00000 159659 BLANK MAGNETIC SIGNS 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 131.80 0.00 131.80 26.45 0.00 26.45 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 144.91 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 131.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 51.51 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 982.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 687.50 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 48.47 0.00 48.47 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 303656 303657 303658 589264 8/23/01-7/9/02 TRVLPUENTE 8/23/01-7/9/02 TRVL S.PUENTE 8/31TRVL SILVIA PUENTE 8/31TRVL SILVIA PUENTE 8/24 TRVL SILVIA PUENTE 8/24 TRVL SILVIA PUENTE VENDOR 900030 - SILVIA P. PUENTE 001-156150-640200-00000 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 589109 20041094 8CF9E 206959 ENTERPRISE LICENSES 20040948 84EB7 206419 LICENSES 20040940 5802B 155417 VISIO ENGLISH 2002 20040520 83B63 158894 LICENSE PAGE 146 VCHR NET 300.00 0.00 208.80 0.00 208.80 001-156150-640300-00000 0.00 001-156150-640300-00000 0.00 0.00 90.88 0.00 90.88 VENDOR 313450 - SOFll~ARE HOUSE INTERMATIOMAL 001-121148-764950-00000 408-253211-652920-00000 0.00 27.46 0.00 27.46 001-121148-652920-00000 0.00 113-138900-652920-00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 327.14 CHECK NO 588691 VENDOR 137280 - SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT 20040963 GEN.PERMIT/G.G.COMM.CTR. 368-116360-649010-00163 AND 588707 VENDOR 174650 - SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DIST SURF.WATER PERMIT/IMMK.RD 331-163650-649010-66042 AND 24,899.06 0.00 24,899.06 540.51 0.00 540.51 559.18 0.00 559.18 491.18 0.00 491.18 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 26,489.93 0.00 350.00 0.00 350.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 350.00 1,000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,750.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040965 588713 VENDOR 328130 - SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DIST BASIN R.O.W.PERMIT/IMM.RD 331-163650-649010-66042 AND CHECK NO 20040964 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,750.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040943 588813 VENDOR 108390 - SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE CONGRESS 32582 111-156332-654210-00000 159809 DUES 0.00 CHECK NO 20040942 589255 VENDOR 363070 · SOUTHERN SOFFIT. INC. 1289 368-116360-634999-00165 158723 SF_AJqLESS GUll'ER 0.00 CHECK NO 20041109 589098 PP #25 PP ~P25 VENDOR 305680 - SOUTHWEST FL PROFESSIOItAL FIREFIGHT 001-000000-218700-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040037 588924 VENDOR 195660 - SPECTRUM PAINTING & RESTORATION i 02535 01 001-122240-639961-00000 201266 PAINT AND SUPPLIES 0.00 CHECK NO 20040970 20040970 20040970 20040970 20040970 20040970 589004 VENDOR 255040 - SPRINT 353 0404 404 8/25 9/24 353 0404 404 8/25 9/24 353 2500 463 8/25 9/24 353 2500 463 8/25 9/24 732 1728 710 8/22 9/21 732 1728 710 8/22 9/21 657 8575 075 8/28 9/27 657 8575 075 8/28 9/27 657 4449 691 8/28 9/27 657 4449 691 8/28 9/27 657 2882 502 8/28 9/27 657 2882 502 8/28 9/27 111-156310-641900-00000 111-156341-641900-00000 111-156332-641900-00000 001-156363-641900-00000 111-156343-641900-00000 111-156349-641900-00000 001-156150-641900-00000 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 418.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,056.83 CHECK TOTAL 613.49 CHECK TOTAL 371.03 60.00 34.55 38.15 77.28 223.48 167.96 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 147 VCHR NET 1,750.00 50.00 50.00 418.00 418.00 2.056.83 2,056.83 613.49 613.49 431.03 34.55 38.15 77.28 223.48 167.96 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040970 774 7133 269 8/19 9/18 774 7133 269 8/19 9/18 20040970 353 9669 908 8/25 9/24 353 9669 908 8/25 9/24 20040970 417 2653 567 8/28 9/27 417 2653 567 8/28 9/27 20040970 775 5008 338 8/22 9/21 775 5008 338 8/22 9/21 20040970 530 7387 098 8/16 9/15 530 7387 098 8/16 9/15 20040970 774 5987 212 8/19 9/18 774 5987 212 8/19 9/18 20040970 643 9757 263 8/16 9/15 643 9757 263 8/16 9/15 20040970 774 5607 574 8/19 9/18 774 5607 574 8/19 9/18 20040970 732 0844 293 8/22 9/21 732 0844 293 8/22 9/21 20040970 261 8208 579 8/25 9/24 261 8208 579 8/25 9/24 20040970 775 2007 829 8/22 9/21 775 2007 829 8/22 9/21 20040970 417 1545 985 8/28 9/29 417 1545 985 8/28 9/29 20040970 774 6470 505 8/19 9/18 774 6470 505 8/19 9/18 20040970 254 1494 531 8/10 9/9 254 1494 531 8/10 9/9 20040970 353 7128 128 8/25 9/24 353 7128 128 8/25 9/24 20040970 643 9824 884 8/16 9/15 643 9824 884 8/16 9/15 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC 123-155974-641900-44600 0.00 111-156390-641900-00000 0.00 129-156110-634999-33015 0.00 001-144210-641900-00000 0.00 001-155410-641900-00000 0.00 001-155410-641200-00000 0,00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 001-121143-641400-00000 0.00 408-253211-641100-00000 0.00 001-121710-641400-00000 0.00 001-156110-641900-00000 0.00 408-253212-641100-00000 0.00 001-144110-641900-00000 0.00 408-233352-641100-00000 0.00 129-156110-634999-33015 0.00 111-156313-641900-00000 0.00 111-156332-641900-00000 0.00 113-138912-641900-00000 0.00 AMT NET 62.90 227.51 36,15 94.09 239,95 26,47 62.90 148.27 30.22 37.06 330.16 172.49 29.00 31.45 22.56 104.76 35.00 31.37 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 148 VCHR NET 62,90 227.51 36.15 94.09 266.42 62.90 148.27 30.22 37.06 330.16 172.49 29.00 31.45 22,56 139.76 31.37 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040970 643 5421 145 8/16 9/15 643 5421 145 8/16 9/15 20040970 643 5506 345 8/16 9/15 643 5506 345 8/16 9/15 20040970 775 5592 091 8/22 9/21 775 5592 091 8/22 9/21 20040970 417 5105 952 8/28 9/27 417 5105 952 8/28 9/27 20040970 261 2382 268 8/25 9/24 261 2382 268 8/25 9/24 20040970 261 5010 616 8/25 9/24 261 5010 616 8/25 9/24 20040970 774 6646 142 8/19 9/18 774 6646 142 8/19 9/18 20040970 732 1295 600 8/22 9/21 732 1295 600 8/22 9/21 20040970 774 7470 893 8/19 9/18 774 7470 893 8/19 9/18 20040970 394 8770 089 8/7 9/6 394 8770 089 8/7 9/6 20040970 657 6818 212 8/28 9/27 657 6818 212 8/28 9/27 20040970 566 2367 258 8/25 9/24 566 2367 258 8/25 9/24 20040970 101 2152 615 8/1 8/31 101 2152 615 8/1 8/31 20040970 775 390 815 8/22 9/21 775 390 815 8/22 9/21 20040970 261 2382 114 8/25 9/24 261 2382 114 8/25 9/24 20040970 591 4903 159 8/19 9/18 591 4903 159 8/19 9/18 20040970 353 6816 050 8/25 9/24 353 6816 050 8/25 9/24 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-144510-641900-00000 0.00 001-144510-641900-00000 0.00 001-156180-641900-00000 0.00 111-156349-641900-00000 0.00 001-156110-641900-00000 0.00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 001-172930-641900-00000 0.00 521-122410-641400-00000 0.00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 144-144360-641900-00000 0.00 111-156334-641900-00000 0.00 111-156380-641900-00000 0.00 001-155410-641900-00000 0.00 470-173463-641900-00000 0.00 001-121143-641400-00000 0.00 408-253211-641100-00000 0.00 408-253211-641100-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 132.16 0.00 'I PAGE 149 VCHR NET 132.16 29.36 0.00 29.36 34.85 0.00 34.85 23.03 0.00 23.03 369.60 0.00 369.60 28.90 0.00 28.90 39.99 0.00 39.99 95.66 0.00 95.66 132.35 0.00 132.35 130.89 0.00 130.89 41.06 0.00 41.06 147.47 0.00 147.47 215.00 0.00 215.00 41.05 0.00 41.05 1,866.90 0.00 1,866.90 31.37 0.00 31.37 33.63 0.00 33.63 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040970 353 2874 099 8/25 9/24 353 2874 099 8/25 9/24 20040970 732 1001 360 8/22 9/21 732 1001 360 8/22 9/21 20040970 774 9222 005 8/19 9/18 774 9222 005 8/19 9/18 20040970 566 3010 077 8/25 9/24 566 3010 077 8/25 9/24 20040970 774 3430 711 8/19 9/18 774 3430 711 8/19 9/18 20040970 389 4505 068 8/22 9/21 389 4505 068 8/22 9/21 20040970 657 1951 307 8/28 9/27 657 1951 307 8/28 9/27 20040970 774 6886 703 8/19 9/18 774 6886 703 8/19 9/18 20040970 643 9757 263 7/16 8/15 643 9757 263 7/16 8/15 20040970 775 1522 694 8/22 9/21 775 1522 694 8/22 9/21 20040970 566 3244 685 8/25 9/24 566 3244 685 8/25 9/24 20040970 353 3636 726 8/25 9/24 353 3636 726 8/25 9/24 20040970 353 3028 514 8/25 9/24 353 3028 514 8/25 9/24 20040970 657 9696 109 8/28 9/27 657 9696 109 8/28 9/27 20040970 774 7960 020 8/19 9/18 774 7960 020 8/19 9/18 20040970 092 2013 245 8/16 9/15 092 2013 245 8/16 9/15 20040970 498 1789 018 8/4 9/3 498 1789 018 8/4 9/3 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-253211-641100-00000 0.00 111-156332-641900-00000 0.00 470-173410-641210-00000 0.00 001-010110-641210-00000 0.00 123-155974-641210-44600 0.00 001-156363-641900-00000 0.00 111-156349-641900-00000 0.00 408-233352-641100-00000 0.00 001-121143-641400-00000 0.00 001-156363-641900-00000 0.00 111-156313-641900-00000 0.00 111-156332-641900-00000 0.00 111-156313-641900-00000 0.00 111-156332-641900-00000 0.00 001-156363-641900-00000 0.00 408-210151-641100-00000 0.00 113-138936-641900-00000 0.00 490-144610-641900-00000 0.00 16J 1 PAGE 150 AMT NET VCHR DISC 29,00 0,00 VCHR NET 29.00 451.67 0.00 451.67 38.74 0.00 38.74 31.57 0.00 31.57 53.29 0.00 53,29 28.90 0.00 28.90 491.24 0.00 491.24 429.22 0.00 429.22 148.97 0.00 148.97 50.94 25.48 0.00 76.42 38.32 0.00 38.32 26.09 0.00 26.09 298.25 0.00 298.25 197.75 0,00 197.75 39.82 0.00 39.82 259.73 0.00 259.73 101.27 0.00 101.27 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041105 589177 VENDOR 347970 PP #25 PP #25 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041121 589096 PP #25 PP #25 VENDOR 301540 STATE OF FLORIDA DISBURSMENT UNIT 001-000000-218810-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303555 589407 VENDOR 900050 STEINBURG AND MILANO,INC STEINBURG VRP 2002 AR3021 113-138900-341260-00000 STEINBURG VRP 2002 AR 3021 0.00 CHECK NO 20039000 589237 VENDOR 362310 SUE HEBBE REIMB FOR POSTAGE 8/19 159532 REIMB FOR POSAGE 8/19 001-121710-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589408 VENDOR 900050 303554 S RICE BOOK REFUND S RICE BOOK REFUND SULIE ROCE 001-156110-347110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588954 VENDOR 220080 20039569 RG0320331 159212 SAFETY VIDEOS SUMMIT TRAINING SOURCE, INC. 518-121630-652990-00000 518-121630-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20039615 588792 VENDOR 17660 - SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 381608 408-233351-652990-00000 206051 SUPPLIES 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 140.00 CHECK TOTAL 6,022.82 CHECK TOTAL 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 8.84 CHECK TOTAL 37.90 CHECK TOTAL 834.00 11.00 CHECK TOTAL 2.16 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 8.828.28 140.00 140.00 6,022.82 6,022.82 150.00 150.00 8.84 37.90 37.90 845.00 845.00 2.16 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 1 PAGE ~152 VOUCHER 20040971 482678 206048 20039598 101646 206435 20039598 102085 206435 DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES 20039599 102022 206405 SUPPLIES 20039600 102259 206405 SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-210130-652990-00000 O.O0 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 109-182602-652990-00000 0.00 109-182901-652990-00000 0.00 NET 7.63 14.27 54.52 9.49 34.18 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 7.63 14.27 54.52 9.49 34.18 20039606 381479 206272 SUPPLIES 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 25.23 0.00 25.23 20040971 482241 206048 SUPPLIES 408-210130-652990-00000 0.00 3.67 0.00 3.67 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 151.15 CHECK NO 588931 20040979 381999 205944 VENDOR 200380 - SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 408-253221-652990-00000 SUPPLIES 0.00 22.10 0.00 22.10 20040979 381867 205944 SUPPLIES 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 59.43 0.00 59.43 20040979 381430 205944 SUPPLIES 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 108.51 0.00 108.51 20040973 381903 205930 SUPPLIES 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 10.87 0.00 10.87 20040979 382150 205944 SUPPLIES 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 9.45 0.00 9.45 20040979 381907 205944 SUPPLIES 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 60.27 0.00 60.27 20039603 381581 206398 SUPPLIES 101-163630-652990-00000 0.00 31.38 0.00 31.38 20040979 381793 205944 SUPPLIES 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 4.15 0.00 4.15 20040979 382328 205944 SUPPLIES 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 17.98 0.00 17.98 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040973 381568 205930 20040973 381601 205930 20040979 382327 205944 20040979 381925 205944 20040979 382186 205944 20040979 381472 205944 20040979 382019 205944 20040973 381708 205930 20040979 381704 205944 20040979 381954 205944 20040979 381317 205944 DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CHECK NO 589010 20040040 842018 204713 PARTS 20040041 839386 204713 PARTS 20040041 838889 204713 PARTS 20040040 840869 204713 PARTS VENDOR 257340 - SUPER PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0,00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 13.39 0.00 1 PAGE 153 VCHR NET 13.39 23.68 0.00 23.68 89.99 0.00 89.99 68.74 0.00 68.74 18.04 0.00 18.04 30.38 0.00 30.38 12.92 0.00 12,92 24,68 0.00 24.68 30.59 0.00 30.59 21.45 0.00 21.45 5.38 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 5.38 663.38 59.46 0.00 59.46 140.58 0.00 140.58 56.31 0,00 56.31 73.86 0.00 73.86 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 330.21 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040828 DESCRIPTION 588980 VENDOR 239980 - SUSAN L SATOW 8/2-9/3 TRVL S.SATOW 8/2-9/3 TRVL S,SATOW COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC ~J~tT NET 111-156381-640200-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040510 588795 VENDOR 18690 - T-SHIRT EXPRESS 5133 111-156349-652110-00000 156135 LIFEGUARD UNIFORM 0.00 CHECK NO 303565 589366 VENDOR 900040 - TACI AKADAG T AKADAG 030603862601 T AY-JkDAG 709 MAINSAIL PL 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041046 203103 588793 VENDOR 18020 - TAMIAMI FORD INC 35486 101-163630-764110-00000 206352 2002 FORD F 150 CREW CM9403 521-122410-646425-00000 203103 CREDIT 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20039586 588975 VENDOR 238410 - TANNER INDUSTRIES 86890 408-253211-641950-00000 159076 FRT ON EMPTY RETURNED CYLIND 0.00 CHECK NO 589265 VENDOR 900030 - TANYA W, SALDIVAR 303595 8/28 TRVL TANYA SALDIVAR 001-156150-640300-00000 8/23 TRVL TANYA SALDIVAR 0.00 CHECK NO 20040608 589165 VENDOR 343040 - I'BE GROUP, INC. #1 (REV.8/8/O2-TBE#75099) 331-163650-631400-66042 205740 5/22-7/11/02 0.00 36.54 CHECK TOTAL 119.25 CHECK TOTAL 39.14 CHECK TOTAL 26.182.20 135.45- CHECK TOTAL 44.23 CHECK TOTAL 20.30 CHECK TOTAL 18,810.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 36.54 36.54 119.25 119.25 39.14 39.14 26,182.20 135.45- 26,046.75 44.23 44.23 20.30 20,30 18,810. O0 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 303484 589367 VENDOR 900040 TBI! NAPLES LTD PARTNERSHIP 05830986000 TBI/ NAPLES L 408-000000-115001-00000 4907 CERROMAR DR. TBI/ NAPLES LTD PA 16J CHECK NO 20041186 589258 VENDOR 363500 TEDDE THOMPSON INTERV TRVL REIMB-8/8/02 194-101540-640300-00000 160060 - INTERV TRVL REIMB 8/8 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 20040471 588985 VENDOR 244940 41882192/4226712 159842 9/14/02 TELIMAGINE, INC. 001-155410-641900-00000 VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20040971 588912 VENDOR 184950 TERRY SIDENER 8/12-9/6 SOCCER INSTRUCT 204393 8/12-9/6 SOCCER INSTRUCTOR 111-156380-634999-00000 1 CHECK NO 589089 VENDOR 295310 20040818 2029 8/1 SHORT PAID 2029 8/1 SHORT PAID THE CENTURIAN GROUP, INC 101-163620-652990-00000 PAGE 155 CHECK NO 589093 VENDOR 298860 20040364 11786 200706 PARTS 20040394 11819 159579 TRASH PUMPS 20040363 11636 200706 PARTS THE EQUIPMENT BOOKIE 521-122410-646425-00000 320-183805-644600-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 VCHR NET 18,810.00 0.00 74.94 0.00 74.94 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 74.94 0.00 704.64 0.00 704.64 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 704.64 0.00 483.00 0.00 483.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 483.00 0.00 291.20 0.00 291.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 291.20 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 14.92 0.00 14.92 0.00 840.00 0.00 840.00 0.00 95.56 0.00 95.56 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 950.48 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC ~ NET CHECK NO 588958 VENDOR 223930 - THE HILLER GROUP. INC. 20041056 1011941 8/9 200147 FUEL 495-192370-642415-00000 0.00 20041182 1011940 200145 FUEL 495-192370-642416-00000 0.00 20041127 1012027 200145 JET-A FUEL 495-192370-642416-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588786 VENDOR 14880 - THE PHOTO LAB 20040643 82107 ANIMAL CONTROL 159858 FILM 20040648 82511 PARKS AND RECREATIO 201209 FILM 20040642 82164 ANIMAL CONTROL 159857 FILM 20039557 82225 PUBLIC LIBRARY 200458 PRINTS 001-155410-647210-00000 111-156310-647210-00000 001-155410-647210-00000 129-156110-652990-33774 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040509 589247 VENDOR 362830 - THE TROPHY CASE OF NAPLES, INC. 10484 517-121640-649990-00000 159772 ENGI~AVING PLAQUE AND PLATE 0.00 CHECK NO 20040713 588716 VENDOR 361850 - THE WESTIN GALLERIA CONF 677199526 J YONKOSKY 408-210151-640300-00000 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20040826 20040826 589234 VENDOR 361850 - THE WESTIN GALLERIA CONF#177195786 M.THURSTON 408-210151-640300-00000 206801 - CONF#177195786 M.THURSTON CONF#177195786 D.DEOSS 408-210151-640300-00000 206801 - CONF#177195786 D.DEOSS 0.00 0.00 12,564.45 9,511.76 9,447.53 CHECK TOTAL 60.60 26.35 6.10 40.00 CHECK TOTAL 46.00 CHECK TOTAL 596.00 CHECK TOTAL 596.00 596.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 156 VCHR NET 12,564.45 9,511.76 9,447.53 31,523.74 60.60 26.35 6.10 40.00 133.05 46.00 46.00 596.00 596.00 596.00 596.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO ~ DISC CHECK NO 303560 589368 VENDOR 900040 - THEODORE AND LINDA FEKETE T&L FEKETE 06009210402 408-000000-115001-00000 T&L FEKETE 1812 PICCADILLY CIRCUS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041045 20040824 589215 VENDOR 358240 - THOMAS HENNING 9/9 TRVL T.HENNING 001-010110-640310-01003 9/9 TRVL T.HENNING 8/29 TRVL T.HENNING 001-010110-640310-01003 8/29 TRVL T.HENNING 0,00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041043 589178 VENDOR 348460 - THOMAS J LEITHAUSER 8/7-9/3 TRVL T.LEITHAUSER 111-156395-640200-00000 8/7-9/3 TRVL T.LEITFL~USER 0.00 CHECK NO 20040836 589147 VENDOR 333390 - TONI MOTT 8/21-29 TRVL T,MOTT 8/21-29 TRVL T.MO1-F 001-122310-640200-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040519 589107 VENDOR 311820 - TONY'S DOCKSIDE SERVICE 690062 144-144360-646810-00000 159750 REMOVED OLD RUBP~qIL 0.00 CHECK NO 20039009 20039005 20039012 588979 267 159411 VGA MONITOR 271 159506 LINE FOR EXT 265 159410 RUN NEW DATA LINE FOR PRINTER VENDOR 239650 - TOTAL COMMUNICATION CONCEPTS GROUP. 001-156175-634999-00000 001-156110-634999-00000 001-156110-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 14.78 CHECK TOTAL 46.60 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 45.24 CHECK TOTAL 17.40 CHECK TOTAL 464.85 CHECK TOTAL 65.00 56.25 297.16 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PA.:~.~ 157~ VCHR NET 1.192.00 14.78 14.78 46.60 45.00 91.60 45.24 45.24 17.40 17.40 464.85 464.85 65.00 56.25 297.16 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 589076 VENDOR 290610 - TRANE 20041047 4634576 206654 REPLACE 2 CONDENSING OUTDOOR 20041047 4634575 206654 REPLACE 2 CONDENSING OUTDOOR 301-120435-763100-80162 0.00 301-120435-763100-80162 0.00 CHECK NO 588794 20039013 7.005270 159018 XEROX BOND 20039612 6.020476 200188 COPIES / BLUEPRINTS 20039612 7.005286 200188 COPIES / BLUEPRINTS VENDOR 18490 - TRI-COUNTY BLUEPRINT & SUPPLY 413-263611-651210-73950 0.00 408-210105-647110-00000 0.00 408-210105-647110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041048 589158 VENDOR 336600 - TSI RETAIL INC. 6692 205945 CARPORT 470-173410-764990-00000 472-173430-764990-33821 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589077 VENDOR 291300 - U.S. FILTER 20040807 8917485 8/7 8917485 8/7 408-233351-652310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040909 588974 VENDOR 237380 - U.S. FILTER/DAVIS PROCESS DIVISION 8917580 8/16/02 408-233352-652310-00000 8917580 8/16/02 0.00 CHECK NO 20040918 589026 VENDOR 266740 - U.S. FILTER/STRANCO 186513 8/6/02 408-233352-652990-00000 202702 PARTS 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 1,404.52 3,231.14 CHECK TOTAL 18.00 3.00 1.44 CHECK TOTAL 1,837.50 1,837.50 CHECK TOTAL 4,207.50 CHECK TOTAL 2,557.50 CHECK TOTAL 183.52 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 F~GE 15~ VCHR NET 418.41 1,404.52 3,231.14 4,635.66 18.00 3.00 1.44 22.44 3,675.00 3,675.00 4,207.5O 4,207.50 2,557.50 2,557.50 183.52 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040920 20040920 588796 VENDOR 18900 - UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 0000363797332 8/17/02 001-000000-142900-00000 200056 SHIP 0000363797342 8/24/02 001-000000-142900-00000 200056 SHIP 16J AMT NET CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 20040914 589057 VENDOR 282270 - UNITED RENTAL 27961332-000 8/27/02 206199 SUPPLIES 101-163640-652910-00000 VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20041108 588804 PP #25 PP #25 VENDOR 102380 - UNITED WAY 001-000000-217100-00000 1 CHECK NO 20040921 20040919 20040921 20040919 589118 VENDOR 318860 - US BIOSYSTEMS, INC. 99781 8/14/02 206043 CHEMICAL 408-233350-634999-00000 97500 6/10/02 206059 6/10/02 408-253250-634999-00000 100210 8/26/02 206043 CHEMICAL 408-233350-634999-00000 97953 6/24/02 206059 CHEMICALS 408-253250-634999-00000 PAGE 159 VCHR NET 183.52 0.00 93.73 0.00 93.73 0.00 97.37 0.00 97.37 CHECK NO 20040863 589092 VENDOR 297530 - US FILTER CORP 8634283 408-253212-655200-00000 159094 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 191.10 CHECK NO 589186 VENDOR 350110 - US FILTER/RJ ENVIRONMENTAL 0.00 1,375.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,375.00 1,375.00 0.00 519.26 0.00 519.26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 519.26 0.00 245.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 369.00 0.00 369.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 326.00 0.00 326.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,030.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040908 8917598 8/20/02 203880 CHEMICALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233352-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303632 303631 589409 VENDOR 900050 - VALERIE FINK REF,PARKS V.FINK REF.PARKS VALERIE FINK REF,PARKS V.FINK REF.PARKS VALERIE FINK 111-156381-347290-00000 0.00 111-156381-347290-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589113 VENDOR 314680 - VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES 20040906 A2205908CH 8/1/02 A2005908CH 8/1/02 408-253211-641150-00000 0.00 20040912 A2006266CH 8/1/02 201231 A2006266CH 8/1/02 470-173410-641150-00000 0.00 20040993 A2102038CI 9/1/02 202083 SERVICE 001-454010-641150-00000 0.00 20040925 A2015434CH 8/1/02 203748 SERVICE 669-100220-634999-00000 0.00 20040906 A2003669CH 8/1/02 A2003669CH 8/1/02 408-210105-641150-00000 0.00 20040911 A2101970CI 9/1/02 201745 SERVICE 109-182601-641150-00000 0.00 109-182900-641150-00000 0,00 20040906 A2005371CH 8/1/02 A2005371CH 8/1/02 408-253221-641150-00000 0.00 408-210105-641150-00000 0.00 408-210125-641150-00000 0,00 408-253211-641150-00000 0,00 408-253212-641150-00000 0,00 408-253250-641150-00000 0,00 20040905 A2003669CH 8/1/02 A2003669CH 8/1/02 408-233351-641150-00000 0.00 408-233312-641150-00000 0.00 408-233352-641150-00000 0.00 408-233313-641150-00000 0,00 408-233350-641150-00000 0.00 408-210130-641150-00000 0,00 AMT NET 4,950.00 CHECK TOTAL 110.00 45,00 CHECK TOTAL 2.95 8.54 5.95 4.33- 98.22- 3.00 2.95 17.10 47.67 8.50 9.44 23.25 2.95 27.04 70.51- 8.85 0.00 0.00 35.40 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 4.950.00 4.950.00 110.00 45.00 155.00 160 2.95 8.54 5.95 4.33- 98.22- 5.95 108.91 O. 78 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20039105 A2014704CH 8/1/02 202272 SERVICE 20040916 A2014611CH 8/1/02 201837A2014611CH 8/1/02 20040910 A2102085CI 9/1/02 201323 SERVICE 20040993 A2102038CH 8/1/02 202083 SERVICE 20040922 A2106862CI 9/1/02 201336 SERVICE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 495-192350-641150-00000 0.00 113-138910-641150-00000 0.00 681-421510-641150-00000 0.00 001-454010-641150-00000 0.00 681-431310-641150-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589213 20041093 PP#25 PP #25 VENDOR 357800 - VERMONT STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORP 001-000000-218900-00000 CHECK NO 20040913 588990 VENDOR 249210 - VETROL DATA SYSTEMS. INC. 168-735 5/8/02 113-138900-634999-00000 206384 MAINTENANCE AMT NET VCHR DISC 8.54 0.00 CHECK NO 20040924 20040917 20040923 20040923 20040988 20040988 588797 VENDOR 19260 - VICS SHOE REPAIR 286307 7/30/02 408-233351-652140-00000 SHOE SERVICE 9060000523 9/2/02 113-138917-652110-00000 206813 SHOE SERVICE 285942 7/25/02 408-233352-652140-00000 200603 SHOE SERVICE 285941 7/25/02 408-233352-652140-00000 200603 SHOE SERVICE 9060000477 8/6/02 101-163620-652140-00000 200952 SHOE SERVICE 9060000477 8/6/02 101-163620-652140-00000 200952 SHOE SERVICE 2.97 0.00 VCHR NET 8.54 2.97 71.14 0.00 71.14 5.95 0.00 5.95 21.97 0.00 21.97 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 141.10 0.00 87.15 0.00 87.15 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 87.15 2,800.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,800.00 2.800.00 0.00 113.90 0.00 113.90 0.00 125.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 123.25 0.00 123.25 0.00 93.50 0.00 93.50 0.00 249.86 0.00 249.86 0.00 125.00 0.00 125,00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040924 286306 7/30/02 200802 SHOE SERVICE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233351-652140-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 588833 20041021 VL-O0-08 (8/12/02) 107311 TO 8/12/02 20041021 VL-O0-08 (8/30/02) 107311 TO 8/30/02 20040609 VL-O0-2 (8/8/02) 3376 TO 8/8/02 VENDOR 122690 - VICTOR J. LATAVISH, P.A. 365-116360-631500-00174 0.00 365-116360-631500-00174 0.00 195-116360-763100-80088 0.00 CHECK NO 303628 589369 VENDOR 900040 - VINCENZO ROSATI 05030018301 408-000000-115001-00000 2780 ISLAND POND LN 0.00 CHECK NO 589422 VENDOR 900080 - VIRGINIA KINSEY 303625 AMB.REF.V.KINSEY 12/28/01 490-000000-116004-00000 AMB.REF.VIRGINIA KINSEY 0207511-1 0.00 CHECK NO 20040865 20040866 589129 VENDOR 322110 - VISUAL EDGE TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING 163234 101-163630-634999-00000 159236 METER CHARGE 164860 101-163630-634999-00000 159720 COPIER 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040982 588798 VENDOR 19370 - WALLACE INTERNATIONAL FC82391 8/15/02 521-122410-646425-00000 200937 PARTS 0.00 CHECK NO 589370 VENDOR 900040 - WARREN A & DONNA M OWENS TRS AMT NET 35.95 CHECK TOTAL 5.200.00 600.00 800.00 CHECK TOTAL 21.47 CHECK TOTAL 269.68 CHECK TOTAL 64.51 23.18 CHECK TOTAL 67.10 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 35.95 866.46 5.200.00 600.00 800.00 6,600.00 21.47 21.47 269.68 269.68 64.51 23.18 87.69 67.10 67.10 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 303629 04822669500 9815 ROCKY BANK DR. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040979 20040915 588815 VENDOR 109110 - WASTE MGMT OF COLLIER COUNTY 1602415/0194039 9/02 495-192350-643300-00000 201772 SERVICE 1499878/0194000 9/2/02 001-157110-643300-00000 201648 1499878/0194000 9/2/02 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 48.10 0.00 CHECK NO 20040869 588868 VENDOR 151900 - WATER TREATMENT & CONTROL CO. 056349 441-256110-652310-00000 157119 SUPPLIES 1 CHECK NO 20040991 588895 VENDOR 169960 - WBBH-NBC 51292 8/25/02 205482 HAZARDOUS WASTE 470-173462-634999-00000 PAGE 163 CHECK NO 303630 589371 VENDOR 900040 - WCI COMMUNITIES INC 04731457700 408-000000-115001-00000 1867 TARPON BAY DR. SOUTH VCHR NET 48.10 CHECK NO 20040981 589046 VENDOR 276690 - WEATHER SERVICES INTERNATIONAL 0000014898 8/5/02 001-144510-644620-00000 0000014898 8/5/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 48.10 CHECK NO 20040870 589148 VENDOR 333430 - WELLNESS COUNCIL OF AMERICA MEM6OFEB03 517-121640-654110-00000 159826 MEMBERSHIP 0.00 89.50 0.00 89.50 0.00 89.50 0.00 89.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 179.00 0.00 579.21 O.O0 579.21 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 579.21 0.00 1,040.25 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,040.25 1,040.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 292.00 0.00 292.00 0.00 292.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 147.00 0.00 147.00 0.00 147.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 92.88 0.00 92.88 0.00 92.88 SEPTEHBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040982 DESCRIPTION 589007 VENDOR 256920 - WEST GROUP 1000223416/802465366 8/3 202082 1000223416/802465366 8/3/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC ~ NET 001-454010-654110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040978 20040978 588870 VENDOR 155480 - WESTCOAST VETERINARY CLINIC M.THORSON 02-9881 610-155410-631970-00000 201083 M.THORSON 02-9881 8/20 D.CRAWFORD 02-9991 8/27 610-155410-631970-00000 D.CRAWFORD 02-9991 8/27 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303627 589372 VENDOR 900040 - WESTLINKS ASSOC LLP 04619991800 408-000000-115001-00000 4437 BRYNWOOD DR. 0.00 CHECK NO 20040990 589208 VENDOR 356520 - WFTX-TV 20810197 8/25/02 205483 WASTE/ELECTRONICS 470-173462-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040981 588908 VENDOR 180010 - WHITE SANDS VETERINARY CLINIC M. JOHNSON 02-9925 8/13 610-155410-631970-00000 201087 M.JOHNSON 02-9925 8/13/02 0.00 CHECK NO 20040864 588929 VENDOR 198440 - WHOLESALE SCREEN PRINTING 6114 470-173463-652110-00000 158824 EMBROIDER SHIRTS 0.00 CHECK NO 20040980 589175 VENDOR 347060 - WILLIAM ARELL HARRIS W.A. HARRIS 9/6 T-BALL 111-156380-634999-00000 202778 W.A.HARRIS 9/6 T-BALL 0.00 61.25 CHECK TOTAL 65.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 174.38 CHECK TOTAL 1,710.00 CHECK TOTAL 65.00 CHECK TOTAL 263.75 CHECK TOTAL 236.60 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 164 VCHR NET 61.25 61.25 65.00 75.00 140.00 174.38 174.38 1.710.00 1.710.00 65.00 65.00 263.75 263.75 236.60 SEPTEMBER 11. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 303626 589373 VENDOR 900040 04610060202 8224 ALLENDALE CT. WILLIAM PIONATI'E 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303624 589423 VENDOR 900080 WILMA DARLING AMB REF.WILMA DARLING AMB.REF.WILMA DARLING 0222393-1 490-000000-116004-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040610 588799 VENDOR 19770 56115 103342 TO 6/28/02 WILSON MILLER ET AL 325-172921-631400-31005 0.00 CHECK NO 20041022 588843 VENDOR 130660 56855 205387 TO 7/26/02 WILSON. MILLER ET AL 109-182602-631400-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040862 588914 VENDOR 187110 7/29-8/25 159834 JULY/AUG WINK-RADIO 001-100130-648160-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040995 20040995 20040995 20040995 588859 VENDOR 141840 WOODSIDE LANES 22 BOWL g $5 PER 7/5/02 22 BOWL g $5 PER 7/5/02 130-157710-634999-00000 0.00 148 BOWL g $5 PER 7/1/02 206009 148 BOWL B $5 PER 7/1/02 111-156381-634999-00000 0.00 130-157710-634999-00000 0.00 129 BOWL g $5 PER 7/1/02 129 BOWL B $5 PER 7/1/02 111-156395-634999-00000 0.00 13 BOWL g $5 PER 6/24/02 13 BOWL @ $5 PER 6/24/02 111-156341-634999-00000 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 17.06 CHECK TOTAL 339.00 CHECK TOTAL 8.608.00 CHECK TOTAL 340.00 CHECK TOTAL 360.00 CHECK TOTAL 110.00 152.50 587.50 645.00 65.00 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P~..~?E 165 VCHR NET 236.60 17.06 17.06 339.00 339.00 8.608.00 8,608.00 340.00 340.00 360.00 360.00 110.00 740.00 645.00 65.00 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040989 589209 VENDOR 356530 - WT1/K-TV 64561804 8/25/02 205486 HAZARDOUS WASTE 470-173462-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040994 20040994 589029 VENDOR 270320 - WZVN-~J~C 50504 7/28/02 205471 WASTE/RECYCLING 51527 8/25/02 205471 WASTE/RECYCLING 470-173462-634999-00000 0.00 470-173462-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040984 588800 VENDOR 19960 - XEROX CORP 090184430 8/1/02 2O0004 LEASE 001-138710-651210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040977 20040992 588957 VENDOR 223690 - XEROX CORPORATION 090184388 200112-RENTAL & COPIES 6/27-7/27/02 109-182601-644600-00000 109-182900-644600-00000 778-182700-644600-00000 090338398 8/7/02 2061~ COPIER 113-138930-764900-00000 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20040985 588991 VENDOR 249650 - XEROX CORPOFLATION 592403325 8/2/02 113-138900-634999-00000 200168 LEASE 3,430.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040986 588801 VENDOR 20050 - ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 89165614 8/12/02 495-192370-652720-00000 201792 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,444.00 0.00 1,444.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 ~PAGE 166 VCHR NET 1,560.00 3,430,00 3,430.00 1.444.00 1,444.00 2,888.00 720.60 0.00 720.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 720.60 0.00 78.56 0.00 78.56 0.00 78.56 0.00 1,945.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 235.68 1,945.00 2,180.68 0.00 16.35 0.00 16.35 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 824.65 0.00 824.65 0.00 824.65 SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040867 89078355 158701 RESTOCK FIRST AID KIT 20040987 89165569 8/8/02 200529 SUPPLIES 20040868 89433088 157887 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 198-157410-652990-00000 0.00 001-121710-652990-00000 0.00 111-156313-652720-00000 0.00 692 CHECKS WRITTEN 16J PAGEI AMT NET 52.85 VCHR DISC 0.00 VCHR NET 52.85 15.30 0.00 15.30 825.90 0.00 825.90 CHECK TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 0.00 0.00 910.40 8,383,985.59 16J 1 Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County, Florida Finance & Accounting Department MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Re: 09/20/02 Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners Constance C. Murray, General Operations Manager Finance Department/Clerk to the Board Board of County Commissioners Disbursements Please find attached a listing of the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period September 14, 2002 through September 20, 2002. In accordance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1) I request that these reports be included as miscellaneous correspondence to the Board of County Commissioners and made part of the official records. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please telephone me at 774- 8481. Misc. Corms: Date: ~ Copies 10: Q:/Manual Checks/APMLOG BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A/P Manual Check Log DATE ISSUED TO: CK# 16J AMOUNT 9/13/2002 Shell 9/17/2002 National Audubon Society 9/17/2002 Check Run Beginning 9/17/2002 Check Run Ending 467 468 589425 590208 76.82 270.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK NO 20041941 20041941 20041941 20041941 20041941 20041941 20041941 20041941 20041941 20041941 20041941 589850 J FLIPPEN 5/28,6/04.05,06 206893 J FLIPPEN 5/28,6/04.05,06,07 J FLIPPEN 7/09,10,11.12 206893 J FLIPPEN 7/09.10,11,12 J FLIPPEN 6/24,26,27,28 206893 J FLIPPEN 6/24,26,27,28 J FLIPPEN 7/8,09,15 206893 ~ FLIPPEN 7/08.09,15 2 FLIPPEN 6/17,18,19,13,2 206893 ~ FLIPPEN 6/17/18/19/13/20 J FLIPPEN 6/21 206893 J FLIPPEN 6/21 ~ FLIPPEN 6/11,12,05,13,1 206893 J FLIPPEN 6/11,12,05,13.14 J FLIPPEN 7/01,02.03,05, 203893 ~ FLIPPEN 7/02.02,03.05.6/28 J FLIPPEN 5/16,5/22 206893 ~ FLIPPEN 5/16.5/22 J FLIPPEN 5/28.29,30,31, 206893 ~ FLIPPEN 5/28,29,30,31,6/4 2 FLIPPEN 5/16 206893 J FLIPPEN 5/16 VENDOR 273240 - 21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041816 590124 VENDOR 363100 - A!A TI~qNSMISSION & REPAIR 8665 521-122410-646415-00000 159661 REPAIR TRUCK 0.00 CHECK NO 20041804 589915 VENDOR 304440 - A. RIFKIN COMPANY PD7085 159774 NYLON BAGS 001-156160-641950-00000 001-156110-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 3.523.36 943.37 4,536.80 1,506.05 4,536.80 1,013.44 4,536.80 4. 536.80 4.556.12 5,702.88 189.31 CHECK TOTAL 654.05 CHECK TOTAL 507.10 14.94 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 3,523.36 943.37 4.536.80 1,506.05 4,536.80 1,013.44 4,536.80 4.536.80 4,556.12 5,702.88 189.31 35,581.73 654.05 654.05 522.04 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC CHECK NO 20041541 20041541 20041541 20041541 20041541 20041541 589669 G02-0853 200192 OVERTIME G02-0841 200192 SUPPLIES AND LABOR G02-0842 200192 SUPPLIES AND LABOR G02-0843 200192 SUPPLIES AND LABOR G02-0840 200192 SUPPLIES AND LABOR G02-0839 200192 SUPPLIES AND LABOR VENDOR 161100 - ~ GENERATOR & PUMP INC. 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041540 589887 VENDOR 285940 - /kACTION MULCH OF SW FL, INC. 22400 160-162518-646318-00000 202278 EUCALYPTUS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041538 20042263 589892 VENDOR 288960 - ABLE BODY TEMPORARY SERVICE 115009092 200061 TEMPERARY SERVICES 115009115 200061 LABOR 109-182901-634999-00000 20041538 115009092 200061 TEMPERARY SERVICES 109-182602-634999-00000 109-182901-634999-00000 109-182602-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589709 VENDOR 182940 - ACCENT SIGNS 20041815 20641 159038 BEACH SIGNS 001-156363-646316-00000 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 94.00 228.24 274.04 228.24 234.79 516.59 CHECK TOTAL 6,099.60 CHECK TOTAL 3,305.01 720.83 5,233.65 720.83 CHECK TOTAL 240.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~kGE VCHR NET 522.04 94.00 228.24 274.04 228.24 234.79 516.59 1,575.90 6,099.60 6,099.60 3,305.01 5,954.48 720.83 9,980.32 240.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042266 20514 156817 REPLACE, STRIP & CLEAN UP COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-649990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589468 VENDOR 20041806 184788 158278 DOOR SVS 20041806 184876 158278 DOOR SVS 110 - ACTION AUTOMATIC DOOR CO 001-122240-646281-00000 0.00 001-122240-646281-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042262 589631 VENDOR 134370 - AD DESIGNS OF NAPLES, INC. 2183 111-156341-647110-00000 206545 PARKS/REC 0.00 CHECK NO 20042055 589941 VENDOR 317580 - ADECCO 58821833 204370 LABOR 408-210151-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041543 20041543 20042054 20041543 20042054 20041543 20041543 589881 4687 201511 LABOR 4669 201511 LABOR 4731 201511 LABOR 4660 201511 LABOR 4730 201511 LABOR 4667 201511 LABOR 4665 201511 LABOR VENDOR 282670 - ADVANCED AIR & REFRIGERATION, INC. 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 35.00 CHECK TOTAL 175.90 76. O0 CHECK TOTAL 6,188.00 CHECK TOTAL 433.32 CHECK TOTAL 245.11 90.00 212.97 175.00 50.00 262.50 150.00 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 35.00 275.00 175.90 76.00 251.90 6,188.00 6,188.00 433.32 433.32 245.11 90,00 212.97 175.00 50.00 262.50 150.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041543 4661 201511 LABOR 20041543 4662 201511 LABOR 20041543 4663 201511 LABOR 20041543 4666 201511 LABOR 20041543 4508 201511 LABOR 20042054 4732 201511 LABOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589857 20041807 59521 158277 SVS 20042269 59502 201510 DRY CHEMICALS 20042269 58999 201510 DRY CHEMICALS 20041807 59522 158277 SVS 20042269 58997 201510 DRY CHEMICALS 20041807 59528 158277 SVS 20041807 59523 158277 SVS 20042269 59501 201510 DRY CHEMICALS 20041807 58998 158277 SVS 20041807 59531 158277 SVS VENDOR 276040 - ADVANCED FIRE SYSTEMS, INC 001-122240-634007-00000 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 37.50 0.00 1 PAGE ' VCHR NET 37.50 100.00 0.00 100.00 195.95 0.00 195.95 175.00 0.00 175.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 112.50 0.00 112.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.881.53 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 25.35 0.00 25.35 20.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 30.60 0.00 30.60 20.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 80.65 0.00 80.65 44.15 0.00 44.15 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 0.00 43.70 0.00 43.70 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042269 59500 201510 DRY CHEMICALS 20042269 59503 201510 DRY CHEMICALS 20041807 59532 158277 SVS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 001-122240-634007-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041813 589723 VENDOR 189000 - AERIAL CARTOGRAPHICS OF AMERICA INC 84629 320-183805-647210-00000 159584 PRINTS 0.00 CHECK NO 20042009 589744 VENDOR 203600 - AFFORDABLE FENCE & SCREEN 3531002 111-156332-646317-00000 206472 GATES 0.00 CHECK NO 20041409 589469 VENDOR 300 - AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC. 13204 516-121650-631990-00000 205831 TO 8/16/02 0.00 CHECK NO 20041725 590075 VENDOR 357360 - AIR ADVANTAGE MARTINEZ 8/19 206792 MARTINEZ 8/19 191-138785-884200-33752 0.00 CHECK NO 20041818 20041817 589835 VENDOR 264920 - AIRBORNE EXPRESS R4152105 001-155410-641950-00000 160050 AIR EXPRESS S2097001 001-155410-641950-00000 159840 AIR EXPRESS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589757 VENDOR 216840 - ALAMAR SMILEY AMT NET 20.00 20.00 33.15 CHECK TOTAL 266.00 CHECK TOTAL 797.00 CHECK TOTAL 4,081.50 CHECK TOTAL 2,900.00 CHECK TOTAL 16.33 52.08 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I'~AGE VCHR NET 20.00 20.00 33.15 397.60 266.00 266.00 797.00 797.00 4,081.50 4,081.50 2,900.00 2,900.00 16.33 52.08 68.41 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041994 8/2-30 TRVL A.SMILEY 8/2-30 TRVL A.SMILEY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 113-138936-640200-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303728 590154 VENDOR 900030 - ALBERTO SANCHEZ 8/25-9/1 TRVL A.SANCHEZ 001-155410-640300-00000 8/25-9/1 TRVL ALBERTO SANCHEZ 0.00 CHECK NO 20042050 589909 VENDOR 298420 - ALISON BANK VETERANS PARK 201136 INSTRUCTION 111-156380-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041827 20041826 590090 VENDOR 359970 - ALL FINANCIAL NETWORK WCNZ 02-08-054 001-100130-634999-00000 160038 RADIO SPOTS 02-08-053 001-100130-634999-00000 160037 RADIO SPOTS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041544 20041544 20041550 20041547 20041545 20041545 20041545 589593 I0293265 200688 CHEMICALS I0294502 200688 CHEMICALS I0293714 206975 BULK CHEMICALS I0294206 202568 CHEMICALS I0293598 200741 CHEMICALS I0294575 200741 CHEMICALS I0295544 200741 CHEMICALS VENDOR 109450 - ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORPORATION 408-233312-652310-00000 408-233312-652310-00000 408-253211-652310-00000 408-253211-652310-00000 408-233352-652310-00000 408-233352-652310-00000 408-233352-652310-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J AMT NET 151.38 CHECK TOTAL 114.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,332.50 CHECK TOTAL 136.00 144.50 CHECK TOTAL 1,753.01 1,759.03 2.281.14 791.80 1,756.19 1,807.17 1,756.90 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 151.38 151.38 114.00 114.00 1.332.50 1.332.50 136.00 144.50 280.50 1,753.01 1,759.03 2.281.14 791.80 1.756.19 1,807.17 1,756.90 SEPTEM8ER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 589946 20042274 VFB2B27 8/15 VFB2B27 200062 VENDOR 318980 - ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 313-163611-641700-00000 20042271 VFB2B63 8/15 VFB2B6 8/15 200342 20042275 VFB2BP8 8/27/02 VFB2BP8 204905 20042272 VFB2HCS 8/15 VFB2HCS 8/15 205303 20042260 VFB2GUM 9/4 VFB2GUM 9/4 205592 20042273 VFB2BWM 8/15 VFB2BWM 8/15 203386 20042274 VFB2BV4 8/15 VFB2BV4 200062 20042272 VFB2HCS 7/15 VFB2HCS 7/15 205303 20042260 VFB2G4M 5/2 VFB2G4M 5/2 205592 20042276 VFB2BT1/ 8/15/02 VFB2BT1/ 8/15 201953 20042271 VFB2B6V 8/15 VFB2B6 8/15 200342 20042271 VFB2B6Z 8/15 VFB2B6 8/15 200342 20042274 VFB2B25 8/15 VFB2B25 200062 20042274 VFB2B27 8/15 VFB2B27 200062 0.00 114-178970-641700-00000 0.00 123-155972-641700-34640 0,00 111-163646-641700-00000 0.00 101-163640-641700-00000 0.00 001-010510-641900-00000 0,00 313-163611-641700-00000 0.00 111-163646-641700-00000 0.00 101-163640-641700-00000 0.00 470-173410-641700-00000 0.00 114-178970-641700-00000 0.00 114-178970-641700-00000 0.00 313-163611-641700-00000 0.00 101-163609-641700-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589470 VENDOR 460 - ALPHA CHEMICAL AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 110.68 98.60 89.75 171.60 286.55 85.48 144.50 347.50 296.96 74.60 83.65 89.75 144.50 184.50 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I !I PAGE VCHR NET 11,905.24 110.68 98.60 89.75 171.60 286.55 85.48 144.50 347.50 296.96 74.60 83.65 89.75 144,50 184.50 2,208.62 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041808 228211 158268 20041814 228547 158925 20041863 228156 159540 20041803 227550 158209 20042010 228583 204287 20041808 227987 158268 DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES WATER HO(] MAT 19" FLOOR MACHINE FLOOR SIGN SUPPLIES SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122220-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-646283-00000 0.00 111-156395-764990-00000 0.00 001-122240-646283-00000 0.00 001-122240-646283-00000 0.00 001-122220-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589471 20042012 036876 204212 20042011 037024 204519 20042346 037153 201796 20042015 037136 201539 VENDOR 550 - ALPHA OMEGA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 111-156381-646710-00000 111-156381-651210-00000 COPIES SUPPLIES COPIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 111-156310-646710-00000 495-192370-651210-00000 001-010510-646710-00000 0.00 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 382.24 0.00 382.24 211.93 0.00 211.93 CHECK NO 20042085 20042085 589710 VENDOR 183690 - AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF 1153085-REGIST-TWEEDIE 495-192330-654360-00000 159690 - UNDERPYMT 1153085-REGIST-KIRCHNER 495-192370-654360-00000 159690 - OVERPYMT 970.00 0.00 970.00 76.28 0.00 76.28 CHECK NO 590059 VENDOR 351480 - AMERICAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLC 20041406 #13 313-163673-763100-60012 204298 TO 7/27/02 608.60 0.00 608.60 314.44 0.00 314.44 CHECK TOTAL 41.00 7.25 0.00 2,563.49 0.00 48.25 0.00 203.50 0.00 203.50 0.00 96.50 0.00 96.50 0.00 198.56 0.00 198.56 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 546.81 0.00 90.00 0.00 90,00 0.00 35.00- 0.00 35.00- 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 55.00 48,541.89 0.00 48,541.89 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041406 #13 RETAINAGE 204298 TO 7/27/02 RETAINAGE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 313-000000-205100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042265 590012 VENDOR 342040 - AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC. ID~099091 001-121110-654360-00000 206949 MEMBERSHIP 0.00 CHECK NO 20041542 20041542 20041542 20041542 20041542 20041542 20041542 20041542 589596 8/20/02 RED CROSS 201302 TRAINING 8/20/02 RED CROSS 201302 TRAINING 8/20/02 RED CROSS 201302 TRAINING 8/20/02 RED CROSS 201302 TRAINING 8/20/02 RED CROSS 201302 TRAINING 8/20/02 RED CROSS 201302 TRAINING 8/20/02 RED CROSS 201302 TRAINING 8/20/02 RED CROSS 201302 TRAINING VENDOR 111740 - AMERICAN RED CROSS 111-156313-654360-00000 111-156313-654360-00000 111-156313-654110-00000 111-156313-654360-00000 111-156313-654360-00000 111-156313-654360-00000 111-156313-654360-00000 111-156313-654360-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042267 589995 VENDOR 336430 - AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE 784164 113-138312-654210-00000 159988 DUES-C VALERA 0.00 CHECK NO 20042268 589957 VENDOR 325420 - AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES. INC. 28979 001-121810-654360-00000 159517 VIOLENCE/WORKPLACE TRAINING 0.00 AMT NET 4,854.20- CHECK TOTAL 99.00 CHECK TOTAL 450.00 40.00 350.00 150.00 30.00 80.00 50.00 329.00 CHECK TOTAL 338.50 CHECK TOTAL 498.95 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 4,854,20- 43,687.69 99,00 99.00 450.00 40.00 350.00 150.00 30.00 80.00 50.00 329.00 1.479.00 338.50 338.50 498.95 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041819 29109 159613 SAFETY VIDEOS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 518-121630-652990-00000 0.00 518-121630-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041539 590058 VENDOR 351390 - AMERICAN WATER CHEMICALS INC 05-02097 408-253221-652310-00000 204266 CHEMICALS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041822 20042261 589729 VENDOR 193950 - AMERIO~AS A5578-244852 160134 PROPANE A5578-244595 8/22 159721 PROPANE 8/22 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041805 589752 VENDOR 212040 - AMERIGAS - NAPLES A5578-244552 001-155410-643200-00000 160049 FUEL 0.00 CHECK NO 20042168 589965 VENDOR 326290 - AMY TOZIER 9/3-13 TRVL A.TOZIER 9/3-13 TRVL A.TOZIER 123-155974-640200-44600 123-155960-640200-33060 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042339 20042339 20042339 20042339 589942 79186 207202 SINTIVAL JOSEPH 8-06-02 124826 207202 BAINTER SUSAN 4-16-02 124826 207202 BAINTER SUSAN 129461 207202 WRIGHT CARLTON 8-15-02 VENDOR 317980 - ANCHOR HEALTH CENTER 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 990.00 3.95 CHECK TOTAL 15,730.40 CHECK TOTAL 379.68 206.52 CHECK TOTAL 565.56 CHECK TOTAL 36.25 6.38 CHECK TOTAL 289.25 131.95 57.20 955.50 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 993.95 1,492,90 15,730.40 15,730.40 379.68 206.52 586.20 565.56 565,56 42.63 42.63 289.25 131.95 57.20 955.50 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042339 124826 207202 BAINTER SUSAN 4-16-02 20042339 53858 207202 DRUGE BARBARA 5-02 20042339 79186 207202 SINTIVAL JOSEPH 8-06-02 20042339 116846 207202 SYBERT PHYLISS 4-01-02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 590114 VENDOR 362460 - ANDREW ALLEN 20041824 8/19-9/23 159548 8/19-9/23 111-156390-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041828 590008 VENDOR 339920 - ANDREW PERFILIO M.D. P SYBERT 3/12/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160106 P SYBERT 3/12/02 CHECK NO 303738 303735 590155 VENDOR 900030 - ANN CATHRINE VIETS 9/11-12 TRVL ANN C. VIETS 001-156110-640200-00000 9/11-12 TRVL ANN C. VIETS 2/6 & 12 TRVL ANN VIETS 001-156110-640300-00000 2/6 & 2/12 TRVL ANN C. VIETS AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 89.05 0.00 89.05 26.00 0.00 26.00 CHECK NO 20041742 590145 VENDOR 363630 - ANN CERULLO CLOSING 207229 CLOSING 338-163650-761100-60018 269.75 0.00 269.75 CHECK NO 303718 590156 VENDOR 900030 - ANN MARIE MCGOWAN 5/8,6/19.7/17 TRV MCGOWAN 111-156395-640300-00000 5/8,6/19.& 7/17 TRVL ANN MCGOWAN 57.20 0.00 57.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,875.90 362.70 0.00 362.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 362.70 0.00 178.75 0.00 178.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 178.75 0.00 2.03 0.00 2.03 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14.03 2,998.30 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,998.30 0.00 2,998.30 0.00 41.76 0.00 41.76 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20042296 589923 VENDOR 308670 ANTON BURTSCHER REIMB TRVL 11/3-7-PLANE T 001-144510-640300-00000 REIMB TRVL 11/3-7 PLANE TICKETS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041820 589963 VENDOR 325930 1221113 159955 WATER COOLER AQUA PURE OF SW FLORIDA, INC 001-155910-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042013 589776 VENDOR 235890 20333 203054 WATER TRTMT AQUASURE, INC. 001-122240-646284-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042005 589671 VENDOR 161840 22184 200417 CABLE AQUIFER MAINTENANCE & PERFORMANCE 408-253221-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041744 590103 VENDOR 361280 ARCHITECTURAL LAND DESIGN, INC WATERWAYS 3V SVS 331-163650-631990-60018 206941 WATERWAYS JV SVS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041811 589607 VENDOR 115980 ARMSTRONG MEDICAL INDUSTRIES 0920158 159549 INSTR MODEL W TEACH CAPABLY 111-156313-652910-00000 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042198 589649 VENDOR 148190 - ARSENE MAJUSTE 8-30-02 9:30 10:30 681-421190-634402-00000 8-30-02 i HOUR 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 540.00 CHECK TOTAL 55.00 CHECK TOTAL 265.66 CHECK TOTAL 1,436.40 CHECK TOTAL 3,500.00 CHECK TOTAL 397.29 62.00 CHECK TOTAL 16.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 1.. VCHR NET 41.76 540.00 540.00 55.00 55.00 265.66 265.66 1,436.40 1,436.40 3,500.00 3,500.00 459.29 459.29 16.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042198 8-30-02 8:30 9:30 8-30-02 I HOUR 20042198 9-03-02 7:30 1:00 9-03-02 5.5 HOURS 20042198 8-30-02 11:00 12:00 8-30-02 i HOUR 20042198 9-04-02 10:00 12:00 9-04-02 2 HOURS 20042198 8-30-02 10:30 11:00 8-30-02 .5 HOUR 20042198 9-02-02 9:30 10:00 9-04-02 .5 HR 20042198 9/04/02 9-9:30 9-4-02 5 HOURS CHECK NO 589629 VENDOR 132690 - ARTYPE, INC. 20042007 024238 200193 JOURNALS CHECK NO 589952 VENDOR 323320 - AT & T 20041316 730 511 5350 001 7/18 730 511 5350 001 7/18 20042259 730 511 2690 001 8/27 730 511 2690 001 8/27 20041316 058 065 4806 001 6/18 058 065 4806 001 6/18 20042259 056 594 8842 001 8/27 056 594 8842 001 8/27 20042259 056 286 1091 001 8/21 056 286 1091 001 8/21 20042259 056 281 8867 001 8/21 056 281 8867 001 8/21 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 001-100130-647110-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 113-138936-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 188-140480-641400-00000 0.00 408-253211-641210-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 16.00 0.00 ~AGE VCHR NET 16.00 88.00 0,00 88.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 192.00 2,059.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,059.00 2.059. O0 35.57 0.00 35.57 81.05 0.00 81.05 16.17 0.00 16.17 48.78 0.00 48.78 26.09 0.00 26.09 60.86 0.00 60.86 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041316 058 065 4806 001 3/18 058 065 4806 001 3/18 20042259 730 511 5763 001 8/21 730 511 5763 001 8/21 20041316 058 065 4806 001 4/18 058 065 4806 001 4/18 20041316 058 063 7868 001 5/16 058 063 7868 001 5/16 20042259 056 282 6124 001 8/13 056 282 6124 001 8/13 20042259 056 286 0866 001 8/21 056 286 0866 001 8/21 20041316 056 286 1091 001 7/21 056 286 1091 001 7/21 20041316 058 065 4806 001 7/18 058 065 4806 001 7/18 20042259 056 283 9336 001 8/31 056 283 9336 001 8/31 20042259 730 511 5350 001 8/18 730 511 5350 001 8/18 CHECK NO 20042277 589777 VENDOR 236190 - AT&T 055 281 0928 001 8/13 055 281 0928 001 8/13 20041317 019 785 0647 001 7/18 019 785 0647 001 7/18 20042277 730 511 5522 001 7/18 730 511 5522 001 7/18 20042277 730 511 5543 001 8/18 730 511 5543 001 8/18 20042258 020 318 9060 001 8/24 020 318 9060 001 8/24 20041317 030 383 1893 001 6/7 030 383 1893 001 6/7 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 490-144610-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 441-256110-641100-00000 0.00 001-122240-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 408-210151-641100-00000 0.00 001-010510-641210-00000 0.00 470-173442-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-443010-641210-00000 0.00 001-172930-641900-00000 0.00 408-210151-641100-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 52.21 0.00 52.21 54.45 0.00 54.45 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.31 0.00 0.31 17.35 0.00 17.35 13.23 0.00 13.23 76.74 0.00 76.74 3.01 0.00 3.01 28.30 0.00 28.30 85.51 0.00 85.51 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 629.63 16.87 0.00 16.87 2.092.16 0.00 2.092.16 18.80 0.00 18.80 13.31 0.00 13.31 18.98 0.00 18.98 21.55 0.00 21.55 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042277 20042258 DESCRIPTION 056 282 5843 001 7/13 056 282 5843 001 7/13 030 091 6198 001 8/9 030 091 6198 001 8/9 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-443010-641900-00000 0.00 408-253211-641100-00000 0.00 408-253212-641100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042270 589982 VENDOR 333620 - AT&T WIRELESS 17254657 8/30 17254657 8/30 201522 408-210130-641700-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041823 589702 VENDOR 178870 - ATLANTIC BONDING CO. NOTARY - EKNA HU 111-138911-634999-00000 159825 NOTARY COMMISSION 0.00 CHECK NO 589925 20041821 6420495400 160205 COMMITMENT A/B 20041810 6420484800 159717 COMMIT 20041810 6420484700 159717 COMMIT 20041825 6420479300 159420 PALME1-FO RIDGE VENDOR 309230 - A1-FORNEYS' TITLE INSURANCE FUND INC 413-263611-631650-74035 412-273511-631650-70066 412-273511-631650-70066 331-163650-631650-66042 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 590055 VENDOR 349980 - AVATECH 20042264 1420IN 206879 TRAINING 313-162111-654360-00000 101-163630-654360-00000 325-172930-654360-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589944 VENDOR 318740 - AVAYA, INC. AMT NET 21.95 11.56 25.16 CHECK TOTAL 152.38 CHECK TOTAL 74.00 CHECK TOTAL 175.00 175.00 175.00 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 7,400.00 1,850.00 1,850.00 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 21.95 36.72 2,240.34 152.38 152.38 74.00 74.00 175.00 175.00 175.00 150.00 675.00 11,100,00 11,100.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041537 2713988092 AVAYA ACCT 01014411 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589573 VENDOR 101770 - AVIALL 20041809 1500205334 159960 AIRCRAFT PARTS 001-144510-646860-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589472 VENDOR 20042003 U191025542 200692 CAR RENTAL 20042003 Ul17346331 200692 CAR RENTAL 20042003 U149320474 200692 CAR RENTAL 1500 - AVIS RENT A CAR 521-122410-644610-00000 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 7,253.63 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 589888 20041548 2262 201352 FLAT RATE INSTALLATION 20041548 2264 201352 FLAT RATE INSTALLATION 20041812 2275 159095 SVS REPROGRAM 20041548 2233 201352 FLAT RATE INSTALLATION 20041546 2239 206848 INSTALLATION AND LABOR 20041548 2263 201352 FLAT RATE INSTALLATION 20042016 2265 206752 INSTALLATION )PAGE ~16 VCHR NET 7,253.63 7,253.63 370.59 0.00 370.59 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 370.59 0.00 264.20 0.00 264.20 521-122410-644610-00000 0.00 128.09 0.00 128.09 232.07 0.00 232.07 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 624.36 521-122410-644610-00000 0.00 VENDOR 286720 - AZTEK COMMUNICATIONS 001-121141-634999-00000 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 001-121141-634999-00000 0.00 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 001-121141-634999-00000 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 3,721.00 0.00 3,721.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 101-163624-634999-00000 0.00 001-121141-634999-00000 0.00 001-454010-646610-00000 0.00 876.75 0.00 876.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,797.75 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC ART NET CHECK NO 589594 VENDOR 109970 - B & B HYDRAULICS 20042047 41124 200754 PARTS 408-233351-646510-00000 0.00 20042047 41164 200754 PARTS 408-233351-646510-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589648 VENDOR 147980 - B & B TOWING 20042045 59797 200694 SUBLET VOUCHER 20042045 59796 200694 SUBLET VOUCHER 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042046 20042046 589976 VENDOR 331390 - B & B TOWING HH SERVICES INC. 3357 521-122410-646415-00000 200607 SUBLET VOUCHER 3361 521-122410-646415-00000 200607 SUBLET VOUCHER 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041853 20041830 589626 VENDOR 129820 - B & W GOLF CARS, INC 66327 495-192370-646410-00000 159799 PARTS/LABOR 67172 495-192370-646410-00000 160142 TIRES 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041835 590109 VENDOR 362010 - BACKSAVER INTERNATIONAL 110558 111-156332-652910-00000 158904 BACKSAVER TAILGATE ASSIST 0.00 CHECK NO 20042058 589473 VENDOR 1740 - BAKER & TAYLOR CO G32974450 001-156175-652670-00000 204182 MERCHANDISE 0.00 52.51 68.52 CHECK TOTAL 35.00 35.00 CHECK TOTAL 134.00 254. O0 CHECK TOTAL 113.33 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 779.85 CHECK TOTAL 48.74 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 P~GE VCHR NET 52.51 68.52 121.03 35.00 35.00 70.00 134.00 254.00 388.00 113.33 50.00 163.33 779.85 779,85 48.74 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042004 G32934870 207112 MOVIES 20042058 G32938811 204182 MERCHANDISE 20042004 R26849701 207112 MOVIES 20042004 G32839810 207112 MOVIES 20042004 B58987100 207112 MOVIES 20042004 G32936450 207112 MOVIES 20042004 R26849700 207112 MOVIES 20042004 G32879160 207112 MOVIES 20042058 5003866086 204182 MERCHANDISE 20042058 G32938810 204182 MERCHANDISE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 129-156110-652670-33774 0.00 001-156175-652670-00000 0.00 129-156110-652670-33774 0.00 129-156110-652670-33774 O.OO 129-156110-652670-33774 0.00 129-156110-652670-33774 0.00 129-156110-652670-33774 0.00 129-156110-652670-33774 0.00 001-156175-652670-00000 0.00 001-156175-652670-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589943 20042059 342237 BALO~AS VENDOR 318200 - BALGAS 113-138900-322110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042130 20042131 20042132 589651 2646 206018 7/1-31/02 2644 103092 7/1-31/02 2643 203536 7/1-31/02 VENDOR 150030 - BARANY, SCHMITT & WEAVER 351-140475-631401-80119 350-140475-631401-80119 113-138900-631402-80532 355-156150-631500-33776 0.00 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 63,82 0.00 I ~AGE '18 VCHR NET 63.82 112.26 0.00 112.26 67.47 O. O0 67.47 466.81 0.00 466.81 368.65 0.00 368.65 3.90 0.00 3.90 167.03 0.00 167.03 64.27 0.00 64.27 1,336.60 0.00 1,336.60 26.77 0.00 26.77 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,726.32 25.00 0.00 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.00 12,332.69 6,166.35 0.00 18,499.04 0.00 797.49 0.00 797.49 0,00 1,326.60 0.00 1,326.60 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20042129 589841 VENDOR 270830 2632 205072 7/1-31/02 BARANY, SCHMITT. WEAVER 350-140470-763100-80118 0.00 CHECK NO 20042133 589964 VENDOR 326080 2634 102865 7/1-31/02 BAP~ANY.SCHMITT,SUMMERS,WEAVER AND 368-116360-631500-00163 0.00 CHECK NO 20041734 590148 VENDOR 363660 CLOSING 207236 CLOSING BARBARA L. JORDAN 313-163673-761100-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 20036992 590104 VENDOR 361670 BARRY WILLIAMS TUITION REIMB B WILLIAMS 001-155910-654310-00000 TUITION REIMB B WILLIAMS 5/16 16J CHECK NO 590105 VENDOR 361720 20042008 S057617 207109 AUDIOBOOKS BBC AUDIOBOOKS AMERICA 129-156110-652670-33774 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 589694 VENDOR 173430 20042014 25842 201986 MONITORING BEAUMONT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 495-192370-634999-00000 6,902.38 0.00 CHECK NO 589697 VENDOR 174260 20041862 261911 160031 DIRECTORIES 20041862 262786 160031 DIRECTORIES BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 355-156190-766100-00000 355-156190-766100-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.412.35 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 74.849.82 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE i 19 VCHR NET 20,623.13 6.902.38 6,902.38 2,412.35 2.412.35 74.849.82 74.849.82 0.00 491.82 0.00 491.82 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 491.82 1.144.37 O. O0 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.144.37 1.144.37 0.00 33.24 0.00 33.24 0.00 30.77 0.00 30.77 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20042279 589768 VENDOR 229220 - BERKSHIRE VETERINARY HOSPITAL 02-10610 S TREISER 610-155410-631970-00000 200929 02-10610 S TREISER CHECK NO 20042006 20042002 20042125 20041836 589474 VENDOR 23781 206515 LEVELING 23783 203110 ASPHALT #11 106825 TO 8/2/02 23851 157999 FOSSIL ROCK 1910 - BE1-FER ROADS, INC. 195-116360-763400-10521 111-163645-763110-00000 411-273511-763100-70039 331-163650-763100-60071 408-253212-652990-00000 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 VCHR NET 64.01 CHECK NO 20042278 20042278 589642 VENDOR 141230 - BIG CYPRESS ANIMAL CLINIC 02-10228 D BALDWIN 610-155410-631970-00000 200932 02-10228 D BALDWIN 02-10227 D BALDWIN 610-155410-631970-00000 200932 02-10227 D BALDWIN 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041852 589695 VENDOR 173450 - BILL BRANCH CHEVROLET 210483 521-122410-646425-00000 158780 MOTOR & TP~qNSMISS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 20041829 20041829 590134 VENDOR 363310 - BILL HILL - POLK COUNTY EXTENSION DUES-D BLANTON 001-157110-654210-00000 159962 DUES- D BI_ANTON DUES-J BENNET 001-157110-654210-00000 159962 DUES-J BENNET 1,624.00 0.00 194,156.24 0.00 598.00 767,032.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,624.00 194,156.24 767,630.58 0.00 53.72 0.00 53.72 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 963.464.54 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 193.64 0.00 193.64 0.00 193.64 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0,00 75.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041831 589641 VENDOR 140250 - BILL SMITH APPLIANCES 627386 001-122240-652996-00000 158259 AGV 24 BD 0.00 CHECK NO 590127 VENDOR 363230 - BIOLECTRON 20042338 473365 ZAPATA YOLANDA 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589475 VENDOR 20042049 930460 200842 PARTS 20042049 930460 200842 PARTS 2310 - BOB DEAN SUPPLY, INC. 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589630 20042053 123655 205075 PARTS 20042052 124033 202075 PARTS 20042052 123912 202075 PARTS 20042052 123920 202075 PARTS 20042052 123792 202075 PARTS 20042052 121000 202075 CREDIT VENDOR 133300 - BOB TAYLOR CHEVROLET 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589684 VENDOR 168720 - BONITA AUTO SUPPLY/NAPA AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 475.15 CHECK TOTAL 3,181.75 CHECK TOTAL 57.27 0.57- CHECK TOTAL 17.62 196.88 210.95 88.13 248.02 83.20- CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P/~GE VCHR NET lO5.00 475.15 475.15 3,181.75 3.181.75 57.27 0.57- 56.70 17.62 196.88 210.95 88.13 248.02 83.20- 678.40 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042044 617116 203458 PARTS 20042044 618073 203458 PARTS 20042044 617048 203458 PARTS 20042044 617286 203458 PARTS 20042044 617866 203458 PARTS 20042044 617130 203458 PARTS 20042044 616401 203458 PARTS 20042044 617253 203458 PARTS 20042044 618526 203458 PARTS 20042044 617384 203458 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303701 590173 VENDOR 900050 - BONITA BAY PROPERTIES, INC 356228 BONITA BAY 113-000000-115420-00000 356228 BONITA BAY 16J CHECK NO 20042018 589872 VENDOR 280540 - BOYNTON PUMP & IRRIGATION SUPPLY 8011266-00 111-156332-646311-00000 203477 PARTS AMT NET VCHR DISC 22.16 0.00 CHECK NO 20042056 589898 VENDOR 293380 - BQ CONCRETE 1056 201244 MATERIALS 001-122240-646110-00000 .(PAGE ~22 VCHR NET 22.16 298.57 0.00 298.57 49.36 0.00 49.36 3.61 0.00 17.53- 0.00 3.61 17.53- 35.36 0.00 35.36 17.53 0.00 17.53 19.23 0.00 19.23 40.32 0.00 40.32 12.32 0.00 12.32 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 480.93 0.00 20.14 0.00 20.14 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.14 0.00 484.50 0.00 484.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 484.50 0.00 2,491.06 0.00 2.491.06 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042017 DESCRIPTION 1060 202251 MATERIALS/LABOR 20041861 1061 158271 REMOVE CONCRETE PAD CHECK NO 589974 VENDOR 329660 20041837 44882 159790 SUBWOOFER CHECK NO 590015 VENDOR 342890 20041832 D58158 8/21 159276 SHOE/PADS CHECK NO 590204 VENDOR 900100 303713 B ARNOLD 0146673TB B ARNOLD 0146673TB CHECK NO 589653 VENDOR 151240 20042057 90966117 206716 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 20041833 589719 VENDOR 186760 22294 154831 FLUSH METAL DOORS CHECK NO 20042048 20042043 589902 VENDOR 295300 1290484 203457 PARTS I290673 201289 FILTERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233351-634999-00000 0.00 301-120402-763100-80172 0.00 BRENT'S MUSIC HEADQUARTERS 111-156349-652910-00000 BRIGGS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 101-163620-652910-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 914.39 0.00 BRUCE ARNOLD 681-431590-634405-00000 1 BSN 111-156332-646315-00000 0.00 BUILDERS LUMBER & SUPPLY INC. 001-122240-652989-00000 ~AGE 23 BUMPER TO BUMPER 521-122410-646425-00000 VCHR NET 914.39 280.00 0.00 280.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,685.45 0.00 899.98 0.00 899.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 899.98 0.00 782.50 0.00 782.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 782.50 0.00 107.60 0.00 107.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 107.60 2,541.42 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,541.42 2,541.42 0.00 180.00 0.00 180.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 180.00 0.00 6.80 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 6.80 188.02 0.00 188.02 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042048 1290315 203457 PARTS 20042048 1290468 203457 PARTS 20042043 I290608 201289 FILTERS 20042043 I290467 201289 FILTERS 20042048 1290346 203457 PARTS 20042048 1290482 203457 PARTS 20042043 I290554 201289 FILTERS 20042043 I290384 201289 FILTERS 20042048 C26091 203457 PARTS 20042048 1290383 203457 PARTS 20042043 I290596 201289 FILTERS 20042043 I290255 201289 FILTERS 20042048 1290211 203457 PARTS 20042048 1290300 203457 PARTS 20042048 1290257 203457 PARTS 20042043 I0290385 201289 FILTERS 20042048 1290272 203457 PARTS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 31.20 0.00 1 AGE :24 VCHR NET 31.20 17.63 0.00 17.63 2.37 0.00 2.37 168.62 0.00 168,62 3.78 0.00 3.78 1.88 0.00 3.95 0.00 1.97 0.00 119.59- 0.00 7.36 0.00 2.31 0.00 1.88 3.95 1.97 119.59- 7,36 2.31 23.61 0,00 23.61 10,76 0.00 10.76 16.21 0.00 16.21 18.44 0.00 18.44 1.97 0.00 1.97 31.18 0.00 31.18 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042048 1290397 203457 PARTS 20042048 1290167 203457 PARTS 20042048 1290527 203457 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20037436 589940 VENDOR 317460 BUREAU OF ELEVATOR SAFETY RENEW APPL CERT OF OPERAT 408-253221-649010-00000 157109 CERT OF OPERATION RENEWAL CHECK NO 20041834 589999 VENDOR 338610 5470765 159923 PYRETHRIN DIP BURNS VETERINARY SUPPLY 001-155410-652710-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 32.52 0.00 CHECK NO 20042051 589666 VENDOR 159780 BURZYNSKI LAW OFFICE. P.A. 12627 681-421190-631020-00000 201325 PROFESSIONAL FEES PAGE t 25 CHECK NO 20041506 589771 VENDOR 230790 4977-172371 200022 PARTS C.E.D. INC. 101-163630-634999-00000 VCHR NET 32.52 CHECK NO 20041661 589724 VENDOR 193260 010022 202168 LUBE CI{qNGE CALYPSO CAR WASH 521-122410-646415-00000 56.95 0.00 56.95 CHECK NO 20041479 589610 VENDOR 117000 089137 205298 SUPPLIES CAPRI LANDSCAPING & LAWN SERVICE 111-163646-634999-00000 32.95 0.00 32.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 540.89 0.00 82.00 0.00 82.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 82.00 0.00 298.44 0.00 298.44 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 298.44 0.00 2,200.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,200.00 2.200.00 0.00 79.54 0.00 79.54 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 79.54 0.00 22.50 0.00 22.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 22.50 0.00 59.35 0.00 59.35 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041479 DESCRIPTION 089138 205298 SUPPLIES 20041479 089139 205298 SUPPLIES 20041479 089146 205298 SUPPLIES 20041479 089145 205298 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 20041476 589478 VENDOR 89689 200616 PARTS 20041477 88997 200616 PARTS 20041481 089316 202812 SUPPLIES 20041480 88330 200616 PARTS 20041478 89097 200616 PARTS 20041476 89413 200616 PARTS 20041477 89079 200616 PARTS 20041481 089317 202812 SUPPLIES 20041480 88884 200616 PARTS 20041476 89190 200616 PARTS 20041480 88814 200616 PARTS 20041476 89174 200616 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AM1- DISC 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 2860 - CAPRI LAWN & GARDEN EQUIP 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0,00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET 52.01 16.00 260.28 138.59 CHECK TOTAL 30.18 19.25 50.96 15.66 15.35- 124.40 28.60 22.50 38.00 258.47- 233.92 42.07 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 52,01 16.00 260.28 138.59 526.23 30.18 19.25 50.96 15.66 15.35- 124.40 28.60 22.50 38.00 258.47- 233.92 42.07 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041480 88417 200616 PARTS 20041476 88214 200616 PARTS 20041476 89153 200616 PARTS 20041476 89702 200616 PARTS 20041522 088802 159023 PARTS 20041480 88934 200616 PARTS 20041476 89642 200616 PARTS 20041476 89277 200616 PARTS 20041476 89569 200616 PARTS 20041480 088783 200616 PARTS 20041476 D17404 200616 PARTS 20041480 88962 200616 PARTS 20041480 88718 200616 PARTS 20041476 89236 200616 PARTS 20041476 89387 200616 PARTS 20041476 88686 200616 PARTS 20041476 89669 200616 PARTS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 001-156363-652910-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0,00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET 25.35 37.72 11.97 735.00 115.02 205.26 20.62 19.87 6.42 5.04 285.34 43.38 42.07 291.64 5.84- 17.20 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 1PAG~ 27 VCHR NET 25.35 5.84 37.72 11.97 735.00 115.02 205.26 20.62 19.87 6.42 5.04 285.34 43.38 42.07 291.64 5.84- 17.20 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041476 89275 200616 PARTS 20041476 89217 200616 PARTS 20041480 88876 200616 PARTS 20041480 88720 200616 PARTS 20041477 89002 200616 PARTS 20041654 089831 207053 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 495-192330-646410-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041662 589728 VENDOR 193540 - CARIBBEAN LAWN SERVICE 3600 141-112555-634999-00000 200498 ROAQDSIDE MOWING CHECK NO 303719 590157 VENDOR 900030 - CAROLYN COCHRANE 7/9-8/29 TRVL C.COCHRANE 001-157110-640200-00000 7/9-8/29 TRVL CAROLYN COCHP~ANE AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 76.96 0.00 76.96 CHECK NO 20042323 20042323 20042323 589652 E. NERIO 7/23 207204 E. NERIO 7/23 E. NERIO 8/8 207204 E. NERIO 8/8 E. NERIO 7/12 207204 E. NERIO 7/12 VENDOR 150740 - CARROLL A. ENGLISH. M.D., P.A. 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 120.00 0.00 120.00 15.35 0.00 15.35 82.16 0.00 82.16 CHECK NO 20041484 589739 VENDOR 201920 - CARTER FENCE COMPAJ~Y INC. 942 111-156334-646317-00000 206331 REPAIR FENCES 6.24 0.00 6.24 1,829.83 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,829.83 0.00 4.324.16 0.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 500.00 0.00 114.55 0.00 114.55 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 114.55 0.00 48.75 0.00 48.75 0.00 168.35 0.00 168.35 1.839.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 3,175.00 0.00 1.839.50 0.00 2,056.60 0.00 3.175.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041485 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 965 207062 KEY PAD/RECEIVER 20041520 908 158577 CHAIN LINK FENCE 20041521 907 158576 CHAIN LINK FENCE 301-155410-763100-80096 0.00 001-156363-646317-00000 0.00 001-156363-646317-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041659 M. RANSOME 02-10127 200940 M. RANSOME 02-10127 20041659 BOLEN RESCUE 02-10143 200940 BOLEN RESCUE 02-10143 589611 VENDOR 117060 - CAT CARE CLINIC 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589732 20041660 13816 206556 COPIES 20041666 13711 158797 SUPPLIES 20041507 13844 200180 COPIES 20041526 13839 159421 ENVELOPES 20041670 13841 157970 COPIES 20041508 13843 159462 POST CARDS VENDOR 196910 - CECIL'S COPY EXPRESS 114-178975-647110-00000 408-233351-647110-00000 408-253212-647110-00000 408-210105-651210-00000 313-163611-652990-00000 408-210105-651210-00000 413-263611-647110-73949 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041663 590079 VENDOR 357740 - CELLULAR OUTFITTERS, INC. 2820 517-121640-649990-00000 160181 REPAIR 0.00 AMT NET 1,995.00 445.00 685.00 CHECK TOTAL 65.00 65.00 CHECK TOTAL 135.00 52.50 52.50 770.00 20.00 71.60 62.76 CHECK TOTAL 48.00 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 1,995.00 445.00 685.00 6.300.00 65.00 65.00 130.00 135.00 105.00 770.00 20.00 71.60 62.76 1,164.36 48.00 48.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20041494 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 589670 VENDOR 161760 - CERTIFIED SLINGS INC. 273161 521-122410-646425-00000 202226 PARTS AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 20042000 589662 VENDOR 158370 - CHARLES RICE 9/3-5 TRVL C,RICE 9/3-5 TRVL C,RICE 681-431310-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041504 20041504 20041504 20041503 589656 48285 200848 PARTS 5010 200848 PARTS 5011 200848 PARTS 48257 200848 PARTS VENDOR 155420 - CHARLIE'S AUTO GLASS AT NAPLES 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 261.58 0.00 261.58 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 261.58 48.00 0.00 48.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 48.00 CHECK NO 20041509 20041509 20041509 20041510 20041535 20041665 589677 VENDOR 165950 - CHECKPOINT, LTD. CCGBLDGW 202346 MONTHLY MAINT 0.00 152.15 0.00 152,15 CCGBLDGW 202346 MONTHLY MAINT 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 CCGBLDGW 202346 MONTHLY MAINT 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 CHP9857/205005 200068 MONTHLY MONITORING 521-122410-646415-00000 0,00 CHP1841/203736 157954 BURGLAR ALARM 001-122240-646281-00000 S7441 158279 MONTHLY MONITORING 001-122240-646281-00000 304.30 0.00 304.30 289.31 0.00 289.31 85.00 0.00 85.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 830,76 0.00 149.70 0.00 149.70 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 001-122240-646281-00000 408-233352-634999-00000 313-163611-634999-00000 101-163609-634999-00000 001-122240-646281-00000 0.00 12.48 0.00 12.47 0.00 24.95 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041665 A200741 158279 MONTHLY MONITORING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-646281-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041512 589727 VENDOR 193460 - CHEMICAL LIME COMPANY 00153048 408-253211-652310-00000 202567 PEBBLE 0.00 CHECK NO 20041505 589479 VENDOR 3190 - CHEVRON 7898692756208 8/30/02 200617 FUEL 521-122450-652410-00000 521-122410-652410-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042078 590043 VENDOR 348340 - CHRISTOPHER L. HOGENSON 9/3/02 DISC 20KEY EQUIP 130-157710-644600-00000 159735 RENTAL EQUIP 0.00 CHECK NO 303726 590158 VENDOR 900030 - CHUCK DIEHL 8/23 TRVL CHUCK DIEHL 8/23 TRVL CHUCK DIEHL 001-121141-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041483 589480 VENDOR 176 8/25 176 8/25 3360 - CITY OF EVERGLADES 198-157430-643400-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041729 20041729 589481 VENDOR 3390 - CITY OF NAPLES 27743-105544 6/19-8/22 111-163646-643400-00000 27743-105544 6/19-8/22 29761-106094 6/25-8/21 111-156332-643400-00000 29761-106094 6/25-8/21 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 54.90 CHECK TOTAL 5,874.84 CHECK TOTAL 336.76 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 350.00 CHECK TOTAL 21.00 CHECK TOTAL 37.78 CHECK TOTAL 315.30 13.45 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~'AGE 31 VCHR NET 54.90 489.55 5,874.84 5,874.84 336.76 336.76 350.00 350.00 21.00 21.00 37.78 37.78 315.30 13.45 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041513 20041514 589685 VENDOR 168900 - CITY OF I~APLES COLLECTIONS W/E 9/6/02 COLLECTIONS W/E 9/6/02 408-000000-208750-00000 408-000000-208751-00000 408-000000-208764-00000 LOCKBOX W/E 9/6/02 LOCKBOX W/E 9/6/02 408-000000-208750-00000 408-000000-208751-00000 408-000000-208764-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 590159 VENDOR 900030 - CLAIRE OSS 303722 7/9 TRVL CLAIRE OSS 7/9 TRVL CLAIRE OSS 001-156175-640300-00000 CHECK NO 590149 VENDOR 363670 - CLARENCE M. JORDAN 20041735 CLOSING 313-163673-761100-60018 207238 CLOSING AM1- NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20041490 589597 VENDOR 111750 - CLARK'S NURSERY 3591 111-156332-646320-00000 205936 SUPPLIES 5.019.84 1.210.92 92.67 0.00 CHECK NO 20042120 590140 VENDOR 363560 - CLASSIC TITLE & JEAN ALTENORD D/P J.ALTNRD 3637120007 191-138785-884100-44200 J.ALTENORD 3637120007 207220 10.745.40 2.679.41 24.08 CHECK NO 20041491 20041491 590092 VENDOR 360100 - CLEAR CHANNEL RADIO 3858 470-173462-634999-00000 206314 BROADC~ST ADS 3860 470-173462-634999-00000 206314 BROADCAST ADS 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 PAGE 32 VCHR NET 328.75 6,323.43 13,448.89 19.772.32 0.00 29.20 0.00 29.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 29.20 74,849.82 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 74,849.82 74,849.82 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 72.00 2.500.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.121.00 0.00 1.254.00 0.00 2.500.00 2.500.00 1.121. O0 1. 254. O0 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO ANT DISC CHECK NO 20041516 589663 VENDOR 158740 CLERK OF COURTS 1735 101-163609-649035-00000 159435 CITATION-ALARM 3+ TIMES 0.00 CHECK NO 20041848 589449 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK NORTH NAPLES FIRE 02-1702 334-163650-761100-60134 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20041849 589450 VENDOR 166520 B. COLLINS 02-2134 AND CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 338-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 20041727 589438 VENDOR 166520 J. PULLING 02-1908 AND CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 313-163673-761100-62071 0.00 CHECK NO 20041726 589437 VENDOR 166520 J. PULLING 02-1908 AND CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 313-163673-761100-62071 0.00 CHECK NO 20041841 589442 VENDOR 166520 R.PIEPLOW 02-2133 AND CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 338-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 20041847 589448 VENDOR 166520 BIG CORKSCREW 02-2218 AND CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 338-163650-761100-60018 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 28,160.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,900.00 CHECK TOTAL 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 4,900.00 CHECK TOTAL 77,200.00 CHECK TOTAL 92,650.00 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 AGE 33 VCHR NET 2,375.00 75.00 75.00 28,160.00 28,160.00 2,900.00 2,900.00 100.00 100.00 4,900.00 4,900.00 77,200.00 77,200.00 92,650.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 92,650.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20041846 DESCRIPTION 589447 VENDOR 166520 GJR OF NAPLES AND CHECK NO 589446 VENDOR 166520 20041845 L. HERRERA 02-2211 AND CHECK NO 589441 VENDOR 166520 20041840 D. JOHNSON 02-1446 AND CHECK NO 589445 VENDOR 166520 20041844 R. BOLLT 02-2217 AND CHECK NO 589444 VENDOR 166520 20041843 R. SCHUBRING AND CHECK NO 20041839 589440 VENDOR 166520 N.N.UNITEDCHURCH 02-1742 AND CHECK NO 589443 VENDOR 166520 20041842 E. STREAT 02-1906 AND CHECK NO 589439 VENDOR 166520 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 338-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 338-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 334-163650-761100-60134 0.00 CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 338-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 334-163650-761100-60134 0.00 CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 334-163650-761100-60134 0.00 CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK 334-163650-761100-60134 0.00 CLERK OF COURTS DWIGHT E. BROCK AMT NET 96,400.00 CHECK TOTAL 15,000.00 CHECK TOTAL 36,650.00 CHECK TOTAL 164,600.00 CHECK TOTAL 9,700.00 CHECK TOTAL 165,250.00 CHECK TOTAL 938,750.00 CHECK TOTAL 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 96,400.00 96,400.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 36,650.00 36,650.00 164,600.00 164,600.00 9,700.00 9,700.00 165.250.00 165,250.00 938,750.00 938,750.00 34 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041838 CALUSA BAY 02-2040 AND COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 334-163650-761100-60134 0.00 CHECK NO 589482 VENDOR 20041519 3261 159980 SVS 3570 - COASTAL COURIER 001-010510-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041664 590013 VENDOR 342160 - COASTAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH FOUNDA RENEWAL SUB 2003 111-178980-654110-00000 159911 RENEWAL SUBSCRIPTION 0.00 CHECK NO 20042202 589667 VENDOR 160170 - COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC 2812 195-110406-631400-90527 205779 7/6-8/6/02 0.00 CHECK NO 20041517 20041523 590052 VENDOR 349900 - COASTAL STAFFING 1234 159996 STAFFING 1439 157973 STAFFING 001-010510-634999-00000 408-210111-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041488 20041488 20041488 590046 351370-071202 206988L TRAINING SUPPLIES 348416-070302 206988L TRAINING SUPPLIES 353022-071802 206988L TRAINING SUPPLIES VENDOR 348560 - COASTAL TRAINING TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 518-121630-652990-00000 518-121630-641950-00000 518-121630-652990-00000 518-121630-641950-00000 518-121630-652990-00000 518-121630-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 402,100.00 CHECK TOTAL 44.00 CHECK TOTAL 155.00 CHECK TOTAL 5,031.80 CHECK TOTAL 204.80 512.00 CHECK TOTAL 425.00 0.00 1,020.00 0.00 0.00 10.40 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 402,100.00 402,100.00 44.00 44.00 155.00 155.00 5,031.80 5,031.80 204.80 512.00 716.80 425.00 1,020.00 10.40 35 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20011719 590086 VENDOR 359320 - COLEMAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 25192 301-121125-646110-01017 206111 SUPPLIES 0.00 CHECK NO 20041527 20041527 20041527 20041527 589747 VENDOR 205190 - COLLIERANESTHESIA P.A. E PREYSS 7/16 160107 E PREYSS 7/16 D ACOSTA 8/1 160107 D ACOSTA 8/1 D ACOSTA 8/1 160107 D ACOSTA 8/1 V TIPTON 8/13 160107 V TIPTON 8/13 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042163 20042163 20042163 589483 REGIST-M.PE1-FIT 160228 - REGIST-M.PETTIT REGIST-D.WEIGEL 160228 - REGIST-D.WEIGEL REGIST-O.BELPEDIO 160228 - REGIST-2.BELPEDIO VENDOR 3600 - COLLIER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 001-010510-654360-00000 001-010510-654360-00000 001-010510-654360-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041851 589815 VENDOR 257590 - COLLIER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 8/02 CONTRIBUTIONS 001-155810-881100-00000 202094 CONTRIBUTIONS 8/02 0.00 CHECK NO 20041515 589759 VENDOR 218570 - COLLIER COUNTY OVERALL EXTENSION REG D VIDAURRI 111-138721-654360-00000 159595 D VIDAURRI TRAINING 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 3,011.04 CHECK TOTAL 273.00 144.95 277.55 273.00 CHECK TOTAL 20.00 20.00 20.00 CHECK TOTAL 65,733.33 CHECK TOTAL 45.00 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 1,455.40 3,011.04 3,011.04 273.00 144.95 277.55 273.00 968.50 20.00 20.00 20.00 60.00 65,733.33 65,733.33 45.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 589484 VENDOR 3650 20041850 67 AUGUST 02 200619 TRANSPORTATION CHECK NO 20041518 589571 VENDOR 100430 HROiO2JULY RECORD CK 7/18 155983 RECORD CHECK 7/18 CHECK NO 589427 VENDOR 20041737 TAXES/CLOSING AND 8O5O CHECK NO 589429 VENDOR 8050 20042079 20020146 TAGS & TITLE AND CHECK NO 589434 VENDOR 8050 20042084 20020151 TAGS & TITLE AND CHECK NO 589433 VENDOR 8050 20042083 20020150 TAGS & TITLE AND CHECK NO 589426 VENDOR 20041736 TAXES/CLOSING AND 8050 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 001-010510-634999-00000 0.00 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 313-163673-649050-60018 0.00 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 101-163620-649010-00000 0.00 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 521-122410-649010-00000 0.00 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 101-163620-649010-00000 0.00 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 338-163650-649050-60018 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 13,142.43 CHECK TOTAL 5.00 CHECK TOTAL 58.78 CHECK TOTAL 50.85 CHECK TOTAL 52.85 CHECK TOTAL 21.60 CHECK TOTAL 78.52 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 45.00 13,142.43 13,142.43 5.00 5.00 58.78 58.78 50.85 50.85 52.85 52.85 21.60 21.60 78.52 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 78.52 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK NO 589432 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20042082 20020145 TAGS & TITLE AND 101-163620-649010-00000 CHECK NO 20042081 589431 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20020148 TAGS & TITLE 101-163620-649010-00000 AND VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 20042080 589430 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20020147 TAGS & TITLE 101-163620-649010-00000 AND 0.00 50.85 0.00 50.85 CHECK NO 589428 VENDOR 20041738 CLOSING AND 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 338-163650-649050-60018 0.00 300.36 0.00 300.36 CHECK NO 589494 VENDOR 20041728 02700700900 7/25-8/28 02700700900 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700708600 7/25-8/28 02700708600 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700309200 7/25-8/28 02700309200 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700100100 7/25-8/28 02700100100 7/25-8/28 20041717 03900149600 7/31-9/4 03900149600 7/31-9/4 20041717 03600297000 7/31-9/3 03600297000 7/31-9/3 20041717 03600100801 7/31-8/30 03600100801 7/31-8/30 3690 - COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY BILLING 109-182901-634253-00000 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 0.00 43.50 0.00 43.50 0.00 21.60 0.00 21.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.85 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 300.36 2.60 0.00 2.60 6.95 0.00 6.95 18.70 0.00 18.70 26.40 0.00 26.40 330.84 0.00 330.84 12.00 0.00 12.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.60 0.00 21.60 0.00 21.60 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041728 02700100600 7/25-8/28 02700100600 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700512800 7/25-8/28 02700512800 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700501000 7/25-8/28 02700501000 7/25-8/28 20041731 05104076500 7/10-8/7 05104076500 7/10-8/7 20041732 02033620900 7/19-8/15 02033620900 7/19-8/15 20041728 02700216700 7/25-8/28 02700216700 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700715300 7/25-8/28 02700715300 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700316100 7/25-8/28 02700316100 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700304900 7/25-8/28 02700304900 7/25-8/28 20041732 06302463900 7/19-8/16 06302463900 7/19-8/16 20041730 07201452300 7/23-8/21 07201452300 7/23-8/21 20041728 02700305800 7/25-8/28 02700305800 7/25-8/28 20041653 03600100901 7/31-8/30 03600100901 7/31-8/30 20041728 02700507100 7/25-8/28 02700507100 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700310500 7/25-8/28 02700310500 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700500100 7/25-8/28 02700500100 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700605600 7/25-8/28 02700605600 7/25-8/28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-163646-643400-00000 0.00 470-173431-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0,00 152-162541-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 AMT NET 101.35 25.20 14.10 69.48 1,093.56 302.85 6.30 79.10 6.30 63.12 26.40 9.55 1,954.27 6.95 7.60 5.65 172.20 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 101.35 25.20 14.10 69.48 1,093.56 302.85 6.30 79.10 6.30 63.12 26,40 9.55 1,954.27 6.95 7.60 5.65 172.20 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041731 04901636200 7/9-8/7 04901636200 7/9-8/7 20041732 06302614700 7/19-8/16 06302614700 7/19-8/16 20041728 02700703800 7/25-8/28 02700703800 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700304500 7/25-8/28 02700304500 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700605500 7/25-8/28 02700605500 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700605700 7/25-8/28 02700605700 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700301900 7/25-8/28 02700301900 7/25-8/28 20041717 03904895300 7/31-9/4 03904895300 7/31-9/4 20041728 02700120300 7/25-8/28 02700120300 7/25-8/28 20041731 05101636000 7/10-8/9 05101636000 7/10-8/9 20041717 03901644200 7/31-9/4 03901644200 7/31-9/4 20041728 02700711000 7/25-8/28 02700711000 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700716400 7/25-8/28 02700716400 7/25-8/28 20041730 07201961700 7/23-8/20 07201961700 7/23-8/20 20041728 02700306500 7/25-8/28 02700306500 7/25-8/28 20041731 04901636100 7/11-8/8 04901636100 7/11-8/8 20041728 02700303000 7/25-8/28 02700303000 7/25-8/28 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-163646-643400-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-163646-643400-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 152-162541-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-163646-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 AMT NET 266.65 81.16 192.35 66.90 48.30 545.51 4.35 431,60 350.95 127.08 33.00 9.55 12.15 21.00 6.30 300.20 8.25 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t"^ l 40 VCHR NET 266.65 81.16 192.35 66.90 48.30 545.51 4.35 431.60 350.95 127.08 33.00 9.55 12.15 21,00 6.30 300.20 8.25 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041730 07201385900 7/23-8/20 07201385900 7/23-8/20 20041732 06302558100 7/19-8/16 06302558100 7/19-8/16 20041728 02700413600 7/25-8/28 02700413600 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700413100 7/25-8/28 02700413100 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700413500 7/25-8/28 02700413500 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700705700 7/25-8/28 02700705700 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700300300 7/25-8/28 02700300300 7/25-8/28 20041731 02700300402 7/25-8/28 02700300402 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700201200 7/25-8/28 02700201200 7/25-8/28 20041730 07818978801 7/25-8/22 07818978801 7/25-8/22 20041728 02700100300 7/25-8/28 02700100300 7/25-8/28 20041732 05501890800 7/15-8/12 05501890800 7/15-8/12 20041728 02700711600 7/25-8/28 02700711600 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700311800 7/25-8/28 02700311800 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700716800 7/25-8/28 02700716800 7/25-8/28 20041717 03619005700 7/29-8/30 03619005700 7/29-8/30 20041717 03901641100 7/31-9/4 03901641100 7/31-9/4 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 152-162541-643400-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-163646-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 113-138900-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 408-233351-643400-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 64.30 0.00 PA~E 41 VCHR NET 64.30 233.56 0,00 233.56 94.80 0.00 94.80 66.90 0,00 66.90 543.35 0.00 543,35 4.35 0.00 4.35 269.05 0.00 269.05 64.30 0.00 64.30 43.50 0.00 43.50 79.20 0.00 79.20 8.70 0.00 8.70 347.10 0.00 347.10 14.10 0.00 14.10 6.30 0.00 6.30 208.20 0.00 208.20 72.00 0.00 72.00 192.35 0.00 192.35 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041728 02700413800 7/25-8/28 02700413800 7/25-8/28 20041653 03901641200 7/31-9/4 03901641200 7/31-9/4 20041728 02700706600 7/25-8/28 02700706600 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700302000 7/25-8/28 02700302000 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700305500 7/25-8/28 02700305500 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700703500 7/25-8/28 02700703500 7/25-8/28 20041730 07202022000 7/22-8/19 07202022000 7/22-8/19 20041728 02702336301 7/25-8/28 02702336301 7/25-8/28 20041731 05713524200 7/15-8/13 05713524200 7/15-8/13 20041732 06304397400 7/19-8/15 06304397400 7/19-8/15 20041728 02700715900 7/25-8/28 02700715900 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700121200 7/25-8/28 02700121200 7/25-8/28 20041717 03901644700 7/31-9/4 03901644700 7/31-9/4 20041717 03902720800 7/31-9/4 03902720800 7/13-9/4 20041728 02700307000 7/25-8/28 02700307000 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700615100 7/25-8/28 02700615100 7/25-8/28 20041730 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AM1- DISC 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 152-162541-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-163646-643400-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 315.20 0.00 1,876.95 0.00 VCHR NET 315.20 1,876.95 12.80 0.00 12.80 126.70 0.00 126.70 103.30 0.00 103.30 43.50 0.00 43.50 12.00 0.00 12.00 10.90 0.00 10.90 93.42 0.00 93.42 451.82 0.00 451.82 12.80 0.00 12.80 294.40 0.00 294.40 68.40 0.00 68.40 249.24 0.00 249.24 31.00 0.00 31.00 466.00 0.00 466.00 07818978101 7/25-8/22 111-163646-643400-00000 0.00 158.40 0.00 158.40 07818978101 7/25-8/22 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041728 02700100400 7/25-8/28 02700100400 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700303900 7/25-8/28 02700303900 7/25-8/28 20041717 03600100500 7/31-8/30 03600100500 7/31-8/30 20041728 02700300901 7/25-8/28 02700300901 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700709300 7/25-8/28 02700709300 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700700500 7/25-8/28 02700700500 7/25-8/28 20041731 04901635900 7/11-8/8 04901635900 7/11-8/8 20041731 02700300502 7/25-8/28 02700300502 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700700100 7/25-8/28 02700700100 7/25-8/28 20041732 05404171300 7/11-8/9 05404171300 7/11-8/9 20041728 02700502600 7/25-8/28 02700502600 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700503800 7/25-8/28 02700503800 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700504500 7/25-8/28 02700504500 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700700700 7/25-8/28 02700700700 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700312900 7/25-8/28 02700312900 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700313800 7/25-8/28 02700313800 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700308600 7/25-8/28 02700308600 7/25-8/28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156175-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-163646-643400-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-156313-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 6.30 0.00 6.95 0.00 PAGE t 43 VCHR NET 6.30 6.95 195.06 0.00 195.06 201.45 0.00 201.45 41.20 0.00 41.20 217.50 0.00 217.50 35.40 0.00 35.40 471.05 0.00 471.05 31.28 0.00 31.28 1,787.58 0.00 1,787.58 16.70 0.00 16.70 8.90 0.00 8.90 15.40 0.00 15.40 151.40 0.00 151.40 6.95 0.00 6.95 18,00 0.00 18.00 63.65 0.00 63.65 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041717 03900160900 7/31-9/4 03900160900 7/31-9/4 20041717 03600296900 7/31-9/3 03600296900 7/31-9/3 20041717 03901643700 7/31-9/4 03901643700 7/31-9/4 20041732 06102282300 7/17-8/15 06102282300 7/17-8/15 20041728 02700411300 7/25-8/28 02700411300 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700101000 7/25-8/28 02700101000 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700704100 7/25-8/28 02700704100 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700412600 7/25-8/28 02700412600 7/25-8/28 20041731 02714573200 7/25-8/28 02714573200 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700302300 7/25-8/28 02700302300 7/25-8/28 20041730 02729541300 7/26-8/27 02729541300 7/26-8/27 20041728 02700703700 7/25-8/28 02700703700 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700700200 7/25-8/28 02700700200 7/25-8/28 20041730 07215951100 7/22-8/20 07215951100 7/22-8/20 20041730 02729541400 7/26-8/27 02729541400 7/26-8/27 20041728 02700307300 7/25-8/28 02700307300 7/25-8/28 20041732 06302570700 7/19-8/14 06302570700 7/19-8/14 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 001-061010-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 001-156363-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-163646-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 152-162541-643400-00000 0.00 111-163646-643400-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 30.00 0,00 ~ PAGE '~ 44 VCHR NET 30.00 27.84 0.00 27.84 64.38 0.00 64.38 280.49 0.00 280.49 187.15 0.00 187.15 146.85 0.00 146.85 9.55 0.00 9,55 161.15 0.00 161.15 199.80 0.00 199.80 174.80 0.00 174.80 589.90 0.00 589.90 43.50 0.00 43.50 87.00 0.00 87.00 26.40 0.00 26.40 84.96 0.00 84.96 6.95 0.00 6.95 293.10 0.00 293.10 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041728 02700308100 7/25-8/28 02700308100 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700614800 7/25-8/28 02700614800 7/25-8/28 20041728 02701074300 7/25-8/28 02701074300 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700100800 7/25-8/28 02700100800 7/25-8/28 20041728 02700301200 7/25-8/28 02700301200 7/25-8/28 20041653 03610634100 8/15-9/03 03610634100 8/15-9/03 20041730 07202178400 7/23-8/20 07202178400 7/23-8/20 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 109-182901-634253-00000 0.00 111-156332-643400-00000 0.00 152-162541-643400-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589496 VENDOR 3880 - COLLIER FENCE 20041525 2032 158350 REMOVE/REPLACE FENCE 470-173442-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042230 20042332 589800 VENDOR 254850 - COLLIER HEALTH SERVICES. INC PRESC 6/1-6/30 001-155930-652710-00000 206921 PRESCRIP 6/1-6/30 PRESCRIP.DRUGS 7/1-7/31 001-155930-652710-00000 207216 PRESCRIPTION DRUGS 7/1-7/31 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042320 20042320 20042320 589972 J. BRENDLE 7/30 207205 J. BRENDLE 7/30 G. COOPERSMITH 8/15 207205 G. COOPERSMITH 8/15 N. SMITH 8/1 207205 N. SMITH 8/1 VENDOR 329210 - COLLIER NEUROLOGIC NEUROLOGY 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 244.35 117.86 43.50 43.50 386.43 1.268.85 532.23 CHECK TOTAL 687.00 CHECK TOTAL 8,921.66 13,613. O0 CHECK TOTAL 1,548.30 104.00 104.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 244.35 117.86 43.50 43.50 386.43 1,268.85 532.23 21,854.47 687.00 687.00 8,921.66 13,613.00 22.534.66 1,548.30 104.00 104.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042320 N. SMITH 8/15 207205 N. SMITH 8/15 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO ~IT DISC 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041528 20041528 589895 VENDOR 291770 - COLLIER NEUROLOGIC SPECIALISTS P STEWART 8/14 001-155930-631210-00000 160108 P STEWART 9/14 N SMITH 8/15 001-155930-631210-00000 160108 N SMITH 8/15 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042319 589650 VENDOR 150010 - COLLIER SURGICAL CENTER J. WOOD 8/16 001-155930-634101-00000 207208 J. WOOD 8/16 0.00 CHECK NO 589766 20041718 002406 200623 SUPPLIES 20041720 2522 200623 SUPPLIES 20041720 2654 200623 SUPPLIES 20041718 002824 200623 SUPPLIES 20041720 2664 200623 SUPPLIES 20041718 002674 200623 SUPPLIES 20041718 2751 200623 SUPPLIES 20041718 002451 200623 SUPPLIES 20041720 2723 200623 SUPPLIES VENDOR 227020 - COLLIER TIRE & AUTO REPAIR 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~J~T NET 104.00 CHECK TOTAL 48.75 107.93 CHECK TOTAL 1,829.30 CHECK TOTAL 1,708. O0 60.70 927.99 274.20 339.46- 53.86 182.48 82.60 59.40 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 104.00 1,860.30 48.75 107.93 156.68 1,829.30 1,829,30 1,708.00 60.70 927.99 274.20 339.46- 53.86 182.48 82.60 59.40 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041720 DESCRIPTION 2548 200623 SUPPLIES 20041718 002666 200623 SUPPLIES 20041718 002815 200623 SUPPLIES 20041718 02725 200623 SUPPLIES 20041718 002773 200623 SUPPLIES 20041720 2572 200623 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410~646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041529 590099 VENDOR 360920 - COLLIER TIRE COMMERCIAL CENTER 002513 206491 PARTS 20041530 2499 206491 PARTS 20041530 2724 206491 PARTS 20041530 2623 206491 PARTS 20041529 002578 206491 PARTS 20041530 2365 206491 PARTS 20041530 2422 206491 PARTS 20041529 002561 206491 PARTS 20041530 2656 206491 PARTS 20041530 2705 206491 PARTS 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 503.45 0.00 VCHR NET 503.45 84.24 0.00 84.24 1.011.29 0.00 1.011.29 59.40 0.00 59.40 59.40 0.00 59.40 391.30 0.00 391.30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.118.85 63.00 0.00 63.00 116.00 0.00 116.00 62.00 0.00 62.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 66.50 0.00 66.50 91.75 0.00 91.75 158.05 0.00 158.05 17.00 0.00 17.00 157.00 0.00 157.00 58.00 0.00 58.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041529 002567 206491 PARTS 20041530 2376 206491 PARTS 20041530 2401 206491 PARTS 20041530 2405 206491 PARTS 20041529 002580 206491 PARTS 20041529 002582 206491 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AHT DISC 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589775 20041671 6194 159388 COPIES 20041532 6225 200333 COPIES 20041532 6153 200333 COPIES 20041667 6196 202194 COPIES 20041534 6206 201460 COPIES VENDOR 235530 - COLOR TEC COPY CENTER 331-163650-651210-60018 AMT NET VCHR DISC 63.00 0.00 VCHR NET 63.00 22.00 0.00 22.00 CHECK NO 20041501 62.00 0.00 62.00 121.50 0.00 121.50 CHECK NO 20041500 63.00 0.00 63.00 158.05 0.00 158.05 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,338.85 589606 VENDOR 115280 - COMMERCIAL LAND MAINTENANCE 996405 111-163646-634999-00000 200446 REPAIRS 589924 VENDOR 309030 - COM-NET ERICSSON CRITICAL RADIO 435663 113-138915-646610-00000 200274 REPAIR RADIOS 111-156425-651210-00000 0.00 0.00 288.00 0.00 288.00 111-156341-651210-00000 0.00 0.00 121.50 0.00 121.50 11.79 0.00 11.79 55.55 0.00 55.55 243.34 0.00 243.34 94.70 0.00 94.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 638.18 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 121.50 114-178970-647110-00000 0.00 114-178970-647110-00000 0.00 0.00 232.80 0.00 232.80 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041499 996176 200850 20041495 996399 200833 20041496 996437 202356 20041500 996451 200446 20041499 996453 200850 20039941 995872 201082 20039941 995449 201082 20041486 996425 201064 20041511 996461 201071 20041511 996429 201071 20041497 996400 200844 20041497 996454 200844 20039941 996085 201082 20041482 996315 202356 20041500 996413 200446 20041482 995826 202356 DESCRIPTION REPAIRS REPAIRS REPAIRS REPAIRS REPAIRS LABOR LABOR MULCH INSTALL PALMS INSTALL PALMS REPAIRS REPAIRS LABOR LABOR REPAIRS LABOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 150-162545-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 160-162518-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 150-162545-634999-00000 0.00 152-162541-634999-00000 0.00 152-162541-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 152-162541-634999-00000 0.00 160-162518-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 160-162518-634999-00000 0.00 152-162541-634999-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 62.97 0.00 :~ PAGE I 49 VCHR NET 62.97 36.99 0.00 36.99 252.00 0.00 252.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 2.245.20 0.00 2,245.20 422.70 0.00 422.70 2,692.80 0.00 11,588.81 0.00 2,692.80 11,588.81 84.54 0.00 84.54 129.43 0.00 129.43 36.98 0.00 36.98 177.76 0.00 177.76 63.00 0.00 63.00 252.00 0.00 252.00 9,399.56 0.00 9,399.56 285.64 0.00 285.64 20039941 996259 201082 LABOR SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041498 996444 201082 REPAIRS 20041524 996456 156812 RESTAKE TREES 20041511 996452 201071 INSTALL PALMS 20039941 996288 201082 LABOR 20041498 996403 201082 REPAIRS 20041482 996239 202356 LABOR 20039941 996159 201082 LABOR 20042349 994749 200840 MAINTENANCE 20039941 995379 201082 LABOR 20039941 996306 201082 LABOR 20039941 995680 201082 LABOR 20041487 996293 206952 LABOR 20041500 996430 200446 REPAIRS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 152-162541-634999-00000 0.00 001-126334-646314-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 152-162541-634999-00000 0.00 152-162541-634999-00000 0.00 160-162518-634999-00000 0.00 152-162541-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 152-162541-634999-00000 0.00 152-162541-634999-00000 0.00 152-162541-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 111-163646-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589831 20041669 435810 159824 SUPPLIES 20041658 435808 205355 SUPPLIES 20041658 435809 205355 SUPPLIES VENDOR 263070 - COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 126-138333-634999-35020 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 326.71 0.00 ~PAGE 450 VCHR NET 326.71 114.80 0.00 114.80 126.81 0.00 126.81 463.54 0.00 463.54 61.26 0.00 61.26 195.96 0.00 195.96 551.34 0.00 551.34 11.570.00- 0.00 11.570.00- 102.10 0.00 102.10 61.26 0.00 61.26 204.20 0.00 204.20 2,697.71 0.00 2,697.71 105.00 0.00 105.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21,564.07 188-140480-646610-00000 0.00 188-140480-646610-00000 0.00 500.60 0.00 500.60 250.30 0.00 250.30 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041723 IN000304478 205807 ACCESSORIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 146-144380-764210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042229 589463 VENDOR 287310 - COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS 9/02 ACCESS FEES 517-121640-631153-00000 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20041531 20041531 20041531 590016 21735 200436 REPAIRS 21684 200436 REPAIRS 21669 200436 REPAIRS VENDOR 343330 - CONNECTION POINT 408-253212-646610-00000 408-253212-646610-00000 408-253212-646610-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 2,497.75 0.00 2,497.75 CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 303709 303708 590167 04729793100 C. RIGAS C. RIGAS 2342 BU1-FERFLY PALM DR 04729859200 C. RIGAS C. RIGAS 2317 BUTTERFLY PALM DR VENDOR 900040 - CONSTANTINE RIGAS TR 408-000000-115001-00000 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 3,323.65 4,331.25 CHECK NO 589495 VENDOR 20041489 125099 200571 COPIES 20041492 125097 9/02 200851 COPIES 20041493 125322 200574 MAINT 3800 - COPY CONCEPTS 198-157410-646710-00000 521-122410-646710-00000 198-157430-646710-00000 0.00 4,331.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,331.25 CHECK NO 589465 VENDOR 325820 - CORPORATE BENEFIT SERVICES 0.00 34.90 0.00 34.90 0.00 119.95- 0.00 119.95- 0.00 99.95 0.00 99.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14.90 0.00 20.20 0.00 20.20 0.00 13.86 0.00 13.86 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 34.06 0.00 58.97 0.00 58.97 0.00 93.70 0.00 93.70 0.00 57.00 0.00 57.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 209.67 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ~AGE VOUCHER 20042035 ADMIN.FEES AND DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET 517-121640-631153-00000 0.00 26,676.75 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 26.676.75 26.676.75 CHECK NO 20041678 20041678 589770 VENDOR 230460 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 34522381 001-155410-651110-00000 159919 SUPPLIES 35390259 001-155410-651110-00000 159919 SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 56.35 9.95 0.00 0.00 56.35 9.95 20041678 34659050 159919 SUPPLIES 20041678 35423415 159919 SUPPLIES 20041713 35360354 205248 SUPPLIES 001-155410-651110-00000 001-155410-651110-00000 101-163640-651110-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.15 78.03 47.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.15 78.03 47.34 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 215.82 CHECK NO 589864 VENDOR 276650 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 20041673 35239484 203507 SUPPLIES 313-163611-651110-00000 0.00 26,73 0.00 26.73 20041676 35543789 203449 SUPPLIES 113-138312-651110-00000 0.00 59.70 0.00 59.70 20041676 35547051 203449 SUPPLIES 113-138312-651110-00000 0.00 9.28 0.00 9.28 20041707 35360351 203720 SUPPLIES 114-178970-651110-00000 0.00 41.00 0.00 41.00 20041692 35390300 203334 SUPPLIES 001-121710-651110-00000 0.00 45.90 0.00 45.90 20041694 35516773 203347 SUPPLIES 113-138930-651110-00000 0.00 19.90 0.00 19.90 20041693 35512064 203344 SUPPLIES 408-210155-651110-00000 0.00 31.50 0.00 31.50 20041694 35609916 203347 SUPPLIES 113-138930-651110-00000 0.00 19.98- 0.00 19.98- SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041696 20041679 20041657 20039679 20041657 20041695 20041695 20041697 20041657 20041691 20041700 20041701 20041657 20041698 20041704 20041687 20041672 DESCRIPTION 35516906 203371 SUPPLIES 51004618001 159401 SUPPLIES 35547037 203444 SUPPLIES 35141648 203441 SUPPL. 35468914 203444 SUPPLIES 32187673 203358 SUPPLIES 35543389 203358 SUPPLIES 35468926 203371 SUPPLIES 35423430 203444 SUPPLIES 35423458 203334 SUPPLIES 35581550 203438 SUPPLIES 35516874 203439 SUPPLIES 35581485 203444 SUPPLIES 34559366 203375 SUPPLIES 35516911 203539 SUPPLIES 35519382 203314 SUPPLIES 35581566 203463 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-138710-651110-00000 0.00 001-121143-651110-00000 0.00 111-156310-651110-00000 0.00 408-210130-651110-00000 0.00 111-156310-651110-00000 0.00 521-122410-651950-00000 0.00 521-122410-651950-00000 0.00 001-138710-651110-00000 0.00 111-156310-651110-00000 O.OO 001-121710-651110-00000 0.00 130-157710-651110-00000 0.00 111-156425-651110-00000 0.00 111-156310-651110-00000 0.00 001-155910-651110-00000 0.00 001-156160-651110-00000 0.00 001-121810-651110-00000 0.00 111-138911-651110-00000 0.00 16J Alit NET VCHR DISC 91.25 0.00 1 PAGE 53 VCHR NET 91.25 70.13 0.00 70.13 8.09 0.00 8.09 138.57 0.00 138.57 0.83 0.00 0.83 48.99 0.00 48.99 48.99- 0.00 48.99- 42.95 0.00 42.95 1,666.98 0.00 1,666.98 26.16 0.00 26.16 121.85 0.00 121.85 42.51 0.00 42.51 1.95 0.00 1.95 65.34 0.00 65.34 145.80 0.00 145.80 236.36 0.00 236.36 26.90 0.00 26,90 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041685 20041681 20041709 20041711 20041711 20041683 20042331 20041673 20041704 20041684 20041673 20041680 20041707 20041711 20041701 20041704 20041675 DESCRIPTION 35468954 203316 SUPPLIES 35360360 203279 SUPPLIES 35423494 203781 SUPPLIES 34918774 206778 SUPPLIES 35423422 CORPORATE EXPRESS 35516898 203298 SUPPLIES 35746732 206233 SUPPLIES 34841953 203507 SUPPLIES 35516911 203539 SUPPLIES 35543366 203306 SUPPLIES 35327972 203507 SUPPLIES 35620620 203278 SUPPLIES 35423445 203720 SUPPLIES 35423422 206778 SUPPLIES 35547034 203439 SUPPLIES 35547057 203539 SUPPLIES 35329608 203527 SUPPLIESSS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AM1- DISC 001-121152-651110-00000 0.00 111-156313-651110-00000 0.00 111-156332-651110-00000 0,00 123-155972-651110-34640 0.00 123-155960-651110-33060 0.00 101-163612-651110-00000 0.00 301-121125-651930-01017 0.00 101-163609-651110-00000 0.00 001-156150-651110-00000 0.00 101-163630-651110-00000 0.00 101-163609-651110-00000 0.00 495-192350-651110-00000 0.00 114-178970-651110-00000 0.00 123-155972-651110-34640 0.00 111-156425-651110-00000 0.00 001-156145-651110-00000 0.00 113-138900-651110-00000 0.00 AMT NET 72.85 139.01 26.81 222.10 34.93 164.93 11,451.92 58.51 150.00 38.20- 220.10 44.14 21.18 7.53 8.09 68.64 42.23 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 ~AGE 54 VCHR NET 72,85 139,01 26.81 222.10 34.93 164.93 11,451,92 58.51 150.00 38.20- 220,10 44.14 21.18 7.53 8.09 68.64 42.23 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041657 DESCRIPTION 35516872 203444 SUPPLIES 20041697 35581508 203371 SUPPLIES 20041688 35423447 203318 SUPPLIES 20041699 35547047 203406 SUPPLIES 20041693 35278850 203344 SUPPLIES 20041657 34803033 203444 SUPPLIES 20041673 35516908 203507 SUPPLIES 20041698 35423424 203375 SUPPLIES 20041692 35278857 203334 SUPPLIES 20041686 35390285 203317 SUPPLIES 20041695 35614390 203358 SUPPLIES 20041688 35278845 203318 SUPPLIES 20041702 35545987 203440 SUPPLIES 20041715 35581500 206818 SUPPLIES 20041709 35614391 203781 SUPPLIES 20041706 35614407 203616 SUPPLIES 20041710 35423538 204034 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156310-651110-00000 0.00 001-138710-651110-00000 0.00 113-138931-651110-00000 0.00 101-163620-651110-00000 0.00 408-210155-651110-00000 0.00 111-156310-651110-00000 0.00 101-163609-651110-00000 0.00 001-155910-651110-00000 0.00 001-121710-651110-00000 0.00 001-121148-651110-00000 0.00 521-122410-651110-00000 0.00 113-138931-651110-00000 0.00 408-233351-651110-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 111-156332-651110-00000 0.00 001-100130-651110-00000 0.00 111-156390-651110-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 17.64 0.00 17.64 41.08 0.00 41.08 50.35 0.00 50.35 411.47 0.00 411.47 72.22 0.00 72.22 469.98 0.00 469.98 74.74 0.00 74.74 4.48 O. O0 4.48 9.44 O. O0 9.44 58.17 0.00 58.17 4.41 0.00 4.41 151.56 0.00 151.56 168.18 0.00 168.18 759.95 0.00 759.95 221.67 0.00 221.67 26.92 0.00 26.92 96.19 0.00 96.19 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041707 DESCRIPTION 35175557 203720 SUPPLIES 20041695 35468925 203358 SUPPLIES 20041673 34730260 203507 SUPPLIES 20041676 35432216 203449 SUPPLIES 20041684 35614416 203306 SUPPLIES 20040807 35360309 203306 SUPPLIES 20041673 34841953 203507 SUPPLIES 20041676 35612415 203449 SUPPLIES 20041673 35516908 203507 SUPPLIES 20041709 35390276 203781 SUPPLIES 20041714 35516899 206395 SUPPLIES 20042331 35842427 206233 SUPPLIES 20041685 35516886 203316 SUPPLIES 20041682 35545988 203291 SUPPLIES 20041705 35390314 203593 SUPPLIES 20041701 35581565 203439 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 114-178970-651110-00000 0.00 521-122410-651110-00000 0.00 313-163611-651110-00000 0.00 113-138312-651110-00000 0.00 101-163630-651110-00000 0.00 101-163630-651110-00000 O.O0 313-163611-651110-00000 0.00 113-138312-651110-00000 0.00 313-163611-651110-00000 0.00 111-156332-651110-00000 0.00 126-138332-651110-35000 0.00 301-121125-651930-01017 0.00 001-121152-651110-00000 0.00 408-233312-651110-00000 0.00 001-010110-651110-00000 0.00 111-156425-651110-00000 0.00 16J I' PAGE 56 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 41.00 0.00 41.00 56.92 0.00 56.92 80.19- 0.00 80.19- 93.78 0.00 93.78 18.58 0.00 18.58 70.86 0.00 70.86 58.52 0.00 58.52 487.55 0.00 487.55 174.40 0.00 174.40 24.48 0.00 24.48 27.20 0.00 27.20 124.68 0.00 124.68 19.38 0.00 19.38 23.52 0.00 23.52 102.95 0.00 102.95 8.09 0.00 8.09 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 19.484.64 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20042322 20041674 2OO41703 20042321 20041703 DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 590014 35809929 203528 SUPPLIES 35516863 203526 SUPPLIES 35360313 203530 SUPPLIES 35714995 203530 SUPPLIES 35390228 203530 SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC VENDOR 342490 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 198-157430-651110-00000 0.00 198-157410-651110-00000 0.00 198-157440-651110-00000 0.00 198-157440-651110-00000 0.00 198-157440-651110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 590041 VENDOR 347750 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 20041712 32361797 204870 SUPPLIES 001-432040-651110-00000 20041716 34623534 203782 SUPPLIES 001-172910-651110-00000 20041677 35654937 159577 SUPPLIES 001-421020-651110-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1 CHECK NO 303710 590174 VENDOR 900050 - CREEKSIDE WEST CASH BOND REFUND 670-000000-220331-00000 CREEKSIDE /BARRON COLL PAGE ' 57 CHECK NO 20041502 589636 VENDOR 137570 - CROWTHER ROOFING AND SHEET METAL F30089 001-122240-639962-00000 201505 LABOR VCHR NET CHECK NO 20042023 589500 VENDOR 4400 - CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 874875 2/24 470-173410-652990-00000 201210 BO1-FLED WATER 38.08 0.00 38.08 28.01 0.00 28.01 52.95 0.00 52,95 49.62 0.00 49.62 9.78 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13.79- 0.00 9.78 178.44 13.79- 0.00 96.37 0.00 96.37 0.00 105.80 0.00 105.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 188.38 43,943.24 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 43,943.24 43,943.24 0.00 17.82 0.00 17.82 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 246.70 0.00 246.70 0.00 246.70 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042025 20042075 20042027 20042077 20042075 20042021 20042023 20042026 20042021 20042022 20042030 20042023 20042075 20042023 20042032 20042023 20042020 DESCRIPTION 207803 7/25 201213 BOIDLED WATER 792986 8/7 200144 BOTTLED WATER 8/7 824250 8/26 202466 BOTTLED WATER 792986 200144 BOTTLED WATER 792986 5/28 200144 BOTTLED WATER 5/28 788166 8/26 200067 BOTTLED WATER 8/26 874875 5/25 201210 BOTTLED b~ATER 805119 8/26 200852 BOTTLED WATER 788166 8/26 200067 BOTTLED WATER 8/26 295923 8/26 201200 BO1-FLED WATER 8/26 803759 8/26 200088 BOTTLED WATER 8/26 874875 8/25 201210 BOTTLED WATER 792986 4/2 200144 BOTTLED WATER 4/2 874875 12/24 201210 BOTTLED WATER 876367 8/26 200023 BOTTLED WATER 874875 4/25 201210 BO1-FLED WATER 86813358/26 200124 BOTTLED WATER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 470-173441-652990-00000 0.00 109-182602-652990-00000 0.00 408-253212-652990-00000 0.00 109-182901-652990-00000 0.00 109-182602-652990-00000 0.00 101-163609-652990-00000 0.00 470-173410-652990-00000 0.00 001-138710-652990-00000 0.00 313-163611-652990-00000 0.00 470-173435-652990-00000 0.00 113-138900-634999-00000 0.00 470-173410-652990-00000 0.00 109-182602-652990-00000 0.00 470-173410-652990-00000 0.00 101-163630-634999-00000 0.00 470-173410-652990-00000 0.00 490-144610-634999-00000 0.00 23.12 0.00 23.12 14.85 0.00 14.85 38.45 0.00 38.45 14.85 0.00 14.85 8.91 0.00 8.91 8.91 0.00 8.91 20.73 0.00 20.73 8.91 0.00 8.91 2.97 0.00 2.97 261.36 0.00 261.36 2.97 0,00 2.97 14.85 0.00 14.85 5.94 0.00 5.94 35.64 0.00 35.64 8.91 0.00 8.91 35.64 0.00 35.64 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 2.97 0.00 2.97 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042075 79298655/14 200144 BOTTLED WATER 5/14 20042023 874875 11/24 201210 BOTTLED WATER 20042029 207092 6/25 201202 BOTTLED WATER 6/25 20042075 792986 8/21 200144 BOTTLED WATER 8/21 20042021 8888362 8/26 200067 BOI-[LED WATER 8/26 20042075 792986 1/8 200144 BOll-LED WATER 1/8 20042023 874875 3/25 201210 BOTTLED WATER 20042025 207803 8/25 201213 BOTTLED WATER 20042075 792986 4/16 200144 BOTTLED WATER 4/16 20042075 792986 4/30 200144 BOTTLED WATER 4/30 20042020 891556 8/26 200124 BOTTLED WATER 20042020 868133 7/25 200124 BOTTLED WATER 20042020 910547 7/25 200124 BOTTLED WATER 20042023 874875 6/25 201210 BOTTLED WATER 20042076 257048 8/26 201246 BOTTLED WATER 8/26 20042075 792986 6/11 200144 BO1-FLED WATER 792986 6/11 20042023 874875 1/24 201210 BO1-FLED WATER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182602-652990-00000 0.00 470-173410-652990-00000 0.00 470-173435-652990-00000 0.00 109-182602-652990-00000 0.00 313-163611-652990-00000 0.00 109-182602-652990-00000 0.00 470-173410-652990-00000 0.00 470-173441-652990-00000 0.00 109-182602-652990-00000 0.00 109-182602-652990-00000 0.00 490-144610-634999-00000 0.00 490-144610-634999-00000 0.00 490-144610-634999-00000 0.00 470-173410-652990-00000 0.00 001-100110-634999-00000 0.00 109-182602-652990-00000 0.00 470-173410-652990-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 14.85 0.00 8.91 0.00 5.94 0.00 ~PAGE )59 VCHR NET 14.85 8.91 5.94 20.79 0.00 20,79 17.82 0.00 17.82 2.97 0.00 2.97 23,76 0.00 23.76 8.91 0.00 8.91 14.85 0.00 14.85 14.85 0.00 14.85 14.85 0.00 14.85 53.46 0.00 53.46 27.95 0.00 27.95 23.76 0,00 23.76 11.88 0.00 11.88 11.88 0.00 11.88 8.91 0.00 8.91 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042075 792986 200144 20042020 891556 200124 20042024 789834 200449 20042023 874875 201210 DESCRIPTION 11/13 BOTTLED WATER 11/13 7/25 BOTTLED WATER 8/26 BOTTLED WATER 826 8/26 BOTTLED WATER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182602-65299D-00000 0.00 490-144610-634999-00000 0.00 001-101520-652990-00000 0.00 470-173410-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042028 589575 VENDOR 102780 - CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 884841 8/26 517-121640-649990-00000 202349 BOTTLED WATER 8/26 CHECK NO 20041870 20041869 590089 VENDOR 359750 - D-PRO, INC 24/25/33 206197 PROJ.MGMT 24/25/32 206196 PROJ.MGMT 411-273511-631400-70075 412-273511-631400-70066 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 11.88 0.00 11.88 2.97 0.00 2.97 CHECK NO 20040666 589990 VENDOR 334860 - D.N. HIGGINS INC. WD-150 155-112593-763100-00000 205744 FOREST LAKES DEV. 5.94 0.00 5.94 CHECK NO 20041373 20041373 20041884 20040676 589836 716900 159922 SUPPL. 709946 159922 SUPPL. 697580 160186 BLEACH 745233 200208 SUPPL. VENDOR 265700 - DADE PAPER COMPANY 001-155410-652510-00000 001-155410-652510-00000 001-155410-652510-00000 408-253212-652510-00000 2.97 0.00 2.97 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 837.90 0.00 14.85 0.00 14.85 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14.85 2,175.00 3,300.00 CHECK TOTAL 47,329.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 2,175.00 0.00 3,300.00 0.00 5,475.00 0.00 47,329.00 0.00 47,329.00 0.00 54.87 0.00 54.87 0.00 114.00 0.00 114.00 0.00 517.35 0.00 517.35 0.00 85.50 0.00 85.50 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040678 738960 200622 SUPPL. 20040677 745512 200419 SUPPL. DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233312-652510-00000 0.00 408-253221-652510-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041314 590151 VENDOR 363760 - DALE WALLER TUITION REIMB D WALLER515 TUITION REIMB D WALLER 5/15 408-233312-654310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042001 590009 VENDOR 340850 - DARLENE MITCHELL 8/26-30 TRVL D.MITCHELL 681-410510-640300-00000 8/26-30 TRVL D.MITCHELL 0.00 CHECK NO 20041417 589700 VENDOR 174930 · DAVID B FOX 8/3-9/6/02 201433 KAP~qTE 111-156380-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041995 589934 VENDOR 314930 - DAVID CHALICK 7/18& 8/28 TRVL D,CHALICK 7/18 & 8/28 TRVL D.CHALICK 001-156110-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042310 20042310 20042310 20041371 589676 46113 207178 BOOKS 43691 207178 BOOKS 43691 207178 BOOKS 45894 160000 VIDEOS VENDOR 165270 - DAVIDSON TITLES INC. 355-156175-766100-80259 355-156175-766100-80259 355-156175-766100-80259 307-156110-652670-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 140. O0 119.28 CHECK TOTAL 490.65 CHECK TOTAL 182.20 CHECK TOTAL 734.50 CHECK TOTAL 29.46 CHECK TOTAL 4.50- 335.00- 58.38- 192.08 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 140.00 119,28 1,031.00 490.65 490.65 182.20 182.20 734.50 734.50 29.46 29.46 4.50- 335.00- 58.38- 192.08 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042310 42403 207178 BOOKS 20042310 42403 207178 BOOKS 20042310 25314 207178 BOOKS 20042310 42396 207178 BOOKS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355-156175-766100-80259 0.00 355-156175-766100-80259 O.O0 355-156175-766100-80259 0.00 355-156175-766100-80259 0.00 CHECK NO 20041888 589988 VENDOR 334290 - DAVIDSON'S DRY CLEANERS AND FORMAL 257850 8/02 001-122255-634999-00000 158939 DRY CLEANING CHECK NO 20041425 590128 VENDOR 363240 - DEAN HILDAHL, MD E.CAJOUX 8/12/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160109 E.CAJOUX 8/12 ~ PAGE~ 62 CHECK NO 20040680 590031 VENDOR 345880 - DEANGELO BROS, INC. EINVO0001404 109-182602-652310-00000 202264 2-4-D LV6 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 9,337.88 0.00 9,337.88 CHECK NO 20042169 589637 VENDOR 138670 - DEBBI MAXON 9/4-13 TRVL D.MAXON 9/4-13 TRVL D.MAXON 123-155972-640200-34640 123-155974-640200-44600 123-155960-640200-33060 269.20- 0.00 269.20- CHECK NO 20042326 20041879 589978 VENDOR 332420 - DELL COMPUTER CORP 900753898 101-163624-764900-00000 206648 COMPUTER 863208781 001-421010-651950-00000 174.81- 0.00 174.81- 14,690.33 0.00 14,690.33 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 23,378.40 0.00 82.46 0.00 82.46 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 82.46 0.00 48.75 0.00 48.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 48.75 0.00 495.00 0,00 495.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 495.00 8.47 12.70 19.14 0.00 40.31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40.31 1,165.00 0.00 1,165.00 746.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 157692 MONITOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-421010-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042325 20042344 20042325 20042344 589721 901118315 206600 WORKSTATION 878269349 205989 COMPUTERS 901118307 206600 WORKSTATION 878258417 205989 COMPUTERS VENDOR 187770 - DELL COMPUTER CORPOP~qTION 001-122240-764900-00000 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE CHECK NO 20041883 20042328 20042327 589812 868710419 157801 NETWORK CARD 898310495 206611 COMPUTER 886779644 206409 COMPUTER VCHR NET 746.00 1,911.00 0.00 138.95 0.00 138.95 114-178975-764900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041635 20041878 001-122240-764900-00000 0.00 2,238.00 0.00 2,473.88 O. O0 CHECK NO 20041988 8,793.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 114-178975-764900-00000 0.00 2,238.00 VENDOR 256190 - DELL MARKETING L.P. 101-163609-651950-00000 2,473.88 8,793.00 13,643.83 0.00 134.00 0.00 134.00 2,783. O0 O. O0 0.00 1,295.00 0.00 113-138900-651950-00000 0.00 313-163611-764900-00000 0.00 101-163609-764900-00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 7,234.70 0.00 589668 VENDOR 160920 - DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES 25 6141 6/02 BILLING 001-000000-202800-00000 25 6141 6/02 BILLING 30-4174 UNIV.EXT.5/02 001-157110-641900-00000 33-4174 UNIV.EXT.5/02 589985 VENDOR 333920 - DESIGNERS FLOOR COVERINGS INC. 3881 191-138785-884100-44200 C. TORRES 35751720002 206859 2,783.00 1,295.00 4,212.00 7,234.70 0.00 78.39 0.00 78.39 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,514.32 0.00 7,313.09 2,514.32 63 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041997 590084 VENDOR 358580 - DESIREE SAWYER 5/8-7/31 TRVL D.SAWYER 130-157710-640300-00000 5/8-7/31 TRVL D.SAWYER 0.00 CHECK NO 20041426 589501 VENDOR 5240 - DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES. INC. P.SYBERT 2/28/02 001-155930-631990-00000 160111 P.SYPBERT 2/28/02 0.00 CHECK NO 589751 VENDOR 211770 - DIANNE MARTIN 20041882 8/1-8/10 201062 AEROBICS 130-157710-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589793 VENDOR 249860 - DISTRIBUCO 20040681 CPRLL090102 201070 RESTOCK SEPT. 111-156341-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 590088 20040890 15349 206583 MAINT.OF WELLS 20041867 15350 206583 MAINT.OF WELLS VENDOR 359610 - DIVERSIFIED DRILLING 408-253212-634999-00000 408-253212-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041418 589502 VENDOR 5270 - DOMESTIC CUSTOM METALS 11866 408-253211-634999-00000 201782 METAL FAB. 0.00 CHECK NO 20041894 589576 VENDOR 104885 - DON HUNTER. SHERIFF DUI CLAIM #9 115-000000-206903-00000 DUI CLAIM ~q9 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 180.96 CHECK TOTAL 103.68 CHECK TOTAL 497.25 CHECK TOTAL 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 8.668.59 19.332.07 CHECK TOTAL 48.84 CHECK TOTAL 2.545.10 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I !AGE 64 VCHR NET 2.514.32 180.96 180.96 103.68 103.68 497.25 497.25 100.00 100.00 8.668.59 19.332.07 28,000.66 48.84 48.84 2,545.10 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041897 DUI CLAIM #10 DUI CLAIM #10 20041898 TRAFFIC CRASH ~9 TRAFFIC CRASH ~9 20042196 JULY 2002 CLAIM ~ JULY/02 CLAIM #6 20041893 TRAFFIC CRASH #10 TRAFFIC CRASH #10 20041896 JAM CLAIM #10 JAM CLAIM #10 20041899 WIRELESS 911 7/02 WIRELESS 911 JULY/02 20041895 TRAFFIC CRASH #8 TRAFFIC CRASH ~ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 115-000000-206903-00000 0.00 115-000000-206903-00000 0.00 110-182800-634999-00000 0.00 115-000000-206903-00000 0.00 115-000000-206903-00000 0.00 189-000000-206903-00000 0.00 115-000000-206903-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589583 20042222 5330-029016 REIMB.AMERIG REIMB.AMERIGAS 20042222 5330-028979 REIMB.AMERIG REIMB.AMERIGAS 20042222 5330-028948 REIMB.AMERIG REIMB.AMERIGAS VENDOR 106680 - DON HUNTER, SHERIFF 001-061010-643200-00000 0.00 001-061010-643200-00000 0.00 001-061010-643200-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042238 20042238 590093 VENDOR 360410 - DONAVAN COURT REPORTING, INC. 13158 113-138900-634999-00000 207023 TRANSCR.SVS 13066 113-138900-634999-00000 207023 TRANSCR.SVS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303697 590175 VENDOR 900050 - DOUG BI1-FNER REF.ADOP.D BITTNER REF.ADOPTION DOUG BI1-FNER 001-155410-346410-00000 0.00 AMT NET 3,572.87 2,133.20 27,369.81 3,137.47 10,869.71 3,125.82 3,719.17 CHECK TOTAL 169.70 122.71 191.88 CHECK TOTAL 516.00 824.00 CHECK TOTAL 50.00 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~PAGE ~65 VCHR NET 3,572.87 2.133.20 27,369.81 3,137.47 10,869.71 3,125.82 3,719.17 56,473.15 169.70 122,71 191.88 484.29 516.00 824.00 1,340.00 50.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041993 589693 VENDOR 173060 - DOUG SUITOR 6/3-9/6 TRVL D.SUITOR 6/3-9/6 TRVL D.SUITOR 111-178980-640200-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041427 590083 VENDOR 358390 - DOUGLAS L. SHEPARD, MD, PA C.NEWELL 8/9/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160110 8/9/02 C.NEWELL It CHECK NO 303694 590168 VENDOR 900040 - DR. THOMAS STANFIELD DR THOMAS 05801217901 408-000000-115001-00000 DR THOMAS 4782 LAKEWOOD BLVD AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 20041372 589855 VENDOR 275160 - DSI LABORATORIES 200208-0 517-121640-649990-00000 159998 ALCOHOL SCREEN 64.38 0.00 64.38 CHECK NO 20041890 20041890 590074 VENDOR 356580 - DUA COMPUTER RESOURCES, INC. 11902 113-138915-764900-00000 205507 SOFTWARE 11901 113-138915-764900-00000 205507 SOFTWARE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 64.38 0.00 71.50 0.00 71.50 CHECK NO 20041900 20041872 20041872 589830 CIR CT COST FINES,FORF. CIR CT COST FINES,FORF.CONV. CIR CT COST FELONY 8/02 CIR CT COST FELONY 8/02 CIR CT COST CIVIL 8/02 CIR CT COST CIVIL 8/02 VENDOR 261490 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK 681-421190-634401-00000 681-421190-634401-00000 681-421190-634401-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 71.50 0.00 5.64 0.00 5.64 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.64 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.00 2,080.00 1,560.00 CHECK TOTAL 9,640.00 10,410.00 1,720. O0 0.00 0.00 2,080.00 0.00 1,560.00 0.00 3,640.00 0.00 9,640.00 0.00 10,410.00 0.00 1,720.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041872 20041872 DESCRIPTION CTY CT COSTTI~AFFIC 8/02 CTY CT COST TEAFFIC 8/02 CTY CT COST MISD.8/02 CTY CT COST MISD.8/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-431590-635700-00000 0.00 681-431590-635700-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041356 20041889 20041356 20041356 20041356 20041356 20041889 20041889 20041889 20041889 20041889 20041889 20041356 20041889 589682 2788997 2788997 COPIES 2780344 2780344 COPIES 2746396 2746396 COPIES 2780672 2780672 COPIES 2789217 2789217 COPIES 2786275 2786275 COPIES 2789712 2789712 COPIES 2745111 2745111 COPIES 2789707 2789707 COPIES 2785664 2785664 COPIES 2783927 2783927 COPIES 2789710 2789710 COPIES 2784439 2784439 COPIES 2784805 2784805 COPIES VENDOR 166510 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING.ETC, RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING,ETC. 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 331-163650-649030-00000 0.00 001-010510-649030-00000 0.00 518-121630-651210-00000 0.00 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 681-431590-651210-00000 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 001-010510-651210-00000 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 675.00 0.00 675.00 13,035.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13,035.00 0.00 35.480.00 55.50 0.00 55.50 5.00 0.00 5.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 17.00 0.00 17.00 15.00 0.00 15,00 2.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 97.50- 0.00 97.50- 1.00 0.00 1.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041356 DESCRIPTION 2558549 2558549 COPIES 20041889 2789706 2789706 COPIES 20041889 2775290 2775290 COPIES 20041889 2630438 2630438 COPIES 20041356 2558547 2558547 COPIES 20041356 2781990 2781990 COPIES 20041356 2558548 2558548 COPIES 20041889 2780366 2780366 COPIES 20041356 2789141 2789141 COPIES 20041871 12327 D/P 8/02 D/P CHARGES 8/02 20041889 20041356 20041356 20041356 20041356 20041889 RECORDING,ETC. RECORDING.ETC. RECORDING.ETC. RECORDING ETC. RECORDING ETC. RECORDING ETC. ,RECORDING.ETC. 20041356 ,RECORDING.ETC. RECORDING.ETC. 2788025 2788025 COPIES RECORDING,ETC. 2581579 2581579 COPIES RECORDING,ETC. 2781361 2781361 COPIES RECORDING,ETC. 2627080/2631479 2627080 COPIES RECORDING.ETC. 2786930 2786930 COPIES RECORDING.ETC. 2768196 2768196 COPIES RECORDING.ETC. 2782524 2782524 COPIES RECORDING,ETC. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-454010-647110-00000 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 681-431590-651210-00000 0.00 681-431590-634400-00000 0.00 681-421190-651210-00000 0.00 313-163673-633011-62071 0.00 681-421190-651210-00000 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 473-173413-634201-00000 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 111-138911-651210-00000 0.00 408-253212-651210-00000 0.00 113-138312-649030-00000 0.00 413-263611-651210-74034 0.00 681-421190-651210-00000 0.00 313-163673-633011-62071 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 2.00- 0.00 I ~PAGE ~68 VCHR NET 2.00- 2.00 0.00 2.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 127.00 0.00 127.00 2.00- 0.00 2.00- 29.70 0.00 29.70 2.00- 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00- 2.00 19.00 0.00 19.00 1,037.31 O. O0 1.00 0.00 23.00- 0.00 1.00 0.00 66.00- 0.00 6.00 0.00 1.037.31 1.00 23.00- 1.00 66.00- 6.00 68.00 0.00 68.00 12.00 O.OO 12.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041889 20041356 20041889 20041356 20041889 20041889 20041356 20041889 20041889 20041356 20041356 DESCRIPTION 2789709 2789709 COPIESRECORDING.ETC. 2627081/2631481 2627081 COPIES RECORDING.ETC. 2778064 2778064 COPIES RECORDING,ETC. 2767155 2767155 COPIES RECORDING,ETC. 2780365 2780365 COPIES RECORDING.ETC. 2630436 2630436 COPIES RECORDING.ETC. 2786379 2786379 COPIES RECORDING ETC. 2783926 2783926 COPIES RECORDING ETC. 2780368 2780368 COPIES RECORDING ETC. 2785990 2785990 COPIES,RECORDING,ETC. 2780575 2780575 COPIES RECORDING,ETC. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 113-138312-649030-00000 0.00 681-431590-651210-00000 0.00 313-163673-649030-60018 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 681-431590-634400-00000 0.00 191-138785-651210-44200 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 001-454010-651210-00000 0.00 605-122390-649030-00000 0.00 001-010510-651210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041415 20042315 589678 VENDOR 166220 - E. B. SIMMONDS 13270 111-178980-634999-00000 153145 LIGHT MAINT. 13239 368-116360-652992-80604 204511 SVS 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 4.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042233 589618 VENDOR 123830 - EASTSIDE ANIMAL CLINIC 02-9959 B.CARD 610-155410-631970-00000 200973 02-9959 B.CARD 115.50- 0.00 1 ~AGE 69 VCHR NET 4.00 115.50- 39.00 0.00 39.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 127.00 0.00 127.00 6,00 0.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 1.00 102.20 0.00 102.20 74.50 0.00 74.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.983.21 0.00 651.00 0.00 651.00 4.742.50 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,742.50 5.393.50 0,00 75.00 0.00 75.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042233 02-10090 J.COX 200973 02-10090 J.COX CHECK NO 589686 VENDOR 169350 20042343 1346 COLLCT 8/3 207217 8/3 RX CHECK NO 589503 VENDOR 5600 20041368 071702CCG 159982 7/17 MIXER CHECK NO 589451 VENDOR 168170 20041364 COMM,CARTER AND CHECK NO 589454 VENDOR 168170 20041367 COMM.COLEI-TA AND CHECK NO 589453 VENDOR 168170 20041366 COMM.FIALA AND CHECK NO 589452 VENDOR 168170 20041365 COMM.HENNING AND CHECK NO 589897 VENDOR 293290 20042200 1629 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 ECKERD DRUG CO, 001-155930-652710-00000 0.00 ECONOMIC DEVEL COUNCIL 111-100210-654360-00000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 001-010110-640310-01002 AMT NET VCHR DISC 75.00 0.00 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 001-010110-640310-01005 PAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 001-010110-640310-01001 VCHR NET 75.00 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 001-010110-640310-01003 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 ECOSYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES 408-233352-652310-00000 5,247.77 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,247.77 5,247.77 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 45.00 70 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AM[ DISC 205933 TO 6/21/02 408-233352-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041428 589617 VENDOR 122900 - EDU/%RDO R. HUERGO. M.D. J.COWDREY 8/20/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160112 J.COWDREY 8/20/02 0.00 CHECK NO 590176 VENDOR 900050 - EDWARD SKILLIN 303699 REF.E SKILLIN 356172 113-138900-322510-00000 REF.E SKILLIN 5071 HICKORY 0.00 CHECK NO 20042165 20042164 589890 1/16&7/18 TRVL NAGENGAST 1/16 & 7/18 TRVL E.NAGENGAST 7/23-9/12 TRVL NAGENGAST 7/23-9/12 TRVL E.NAGENGAST VENDOR 288340 - ELI7~ABETH NAGENGAST 001-156110-640300-00000 001-156110-640200-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041419 20040686 589602 VENDOR 114800 - ELLIS K. PHELPS & COMPANY 061947 408-233351-655100-00000 200766 PUMP PARTS 061944 408-233351-655100-00000 200766 PARTS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041432 589788 VENDOR 243680 - EMC OIL CORPORATION 83575 495-192350-634999-00000 160140 DISP.USED PETRO. 0.00 CHECK NO 20041874 589955 VENDOR 324180 - EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 329083 490-144610-652720-00000 490-144610-652710-00000 206837 MED SUPPL. 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 2,390.00 CHECK TOTAL 130.00 CHECK TOTAL 21.01 CHECK TOTAL 39.73 32.48 CHECK TOTAL 168.00 777.00 CHECK TOTAL 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 447.50 4,437.48 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 i ~AGE VCHR NET 2,390.00 2,390.00 130.00 130.00 21.01 21.01 39.73 32.48 72.21 168.00 777.00 945.00 30.00 30.00 4,884.98 71 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041370 589705 VENDOR 179840 - EMERGENCY PET HOSPITAL OF COLLIER 13528 001-155410-631980-00000 159965 VET CARE 0.00 CHECK NO 590064 VENDOR 353360 - EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OF NAPLES 20041429 E.PREYSS 7/15/02 160113 E.PREYSS 7/15/02 001-155930-631210-00000 20041429 B.DRILICH 7/24/02 160113 B.DRILICH 7/24/02 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303742 590205 VENDOR 900100 - EMILY 30 HERNANDEZ REIMB.E3 HERNANDEZ0203493 681-431590-634405-00000 REIMB.E3 HERNANDEZ 0203493TB-C 0.00 CHECK NO 20041430 20041430 589939 VENDOR 317080 - ENDOCRINE SPECIALIST PA B.DRILICH 8/1/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160115 B.DRILICH 8/1/02 W.DOMKE 5/6/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160115 W.DOMKE 5/6/02 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303711 590177 VENDOR 900050 - ENGLE HOMES/SW FLORIDA, INC. REF.ENGLEHOMES356739 113-000000-115420-00000 REF.ENGLE HOMES 7830 SANDPIPE 0.00 CHECK NO 303741 590206 VENDOR 900100 - ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ PENA REIMB.E HERNANDEZ0203493 681-431590-634405-00000 REIMB.E HERNANDEZ 0203493TB-C 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 210.00 CHECK TOTAL 226.85 102.05 CHECK TOTAL 42.00 CHECK TOTAL 84.50 162.50 CHECK TOTAL 158.48 CHECK TOTAL 181.20 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 4,884.98 210.00 210.00 226.85 102.05 328.90 42.00 42.00 84.50 162,50 247.00 158.48 158.48 181.20 72 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 181.20 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20042308 DESCRIPTION 590129 VENDOR 363250 ESOTERIX, INC. J.DYSERT 6/25/02 207209 J.DYSERT 6/25/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041431 589600 VENDOR 113710 M.SOPENA 8/5/02 160116 M.SOPENA 8/5/02 EUGENE J. CARR, D.P.M., P.A. 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589460 VENDOR 269730 20041885 L.RAMIE#13600 8/02 AND EUGENIO HERRERA 001-155930-634153-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589504 VENDOR 6120 20041868 30010 8/02 200686 8/02 FUEL EVANS OIL COMPANY 521-122450-652410-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 590034 VENDOR 346510 20041424 11000 159946 PARTS & LABOR EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO. INC. 495-192330-646410-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042221 20041865 589754 VENDOR 214900 08238-56273 8/7-9/6/02 08238-56273 8/7-9/6/02 36531-34472 8/6-9/5/02 36531-34472 8/6-9/5/02 F.P.L. 001-041010-643100-00000 0.00 760-162711-643100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041990 590096 VENDOR 360820 - FAPA REGIST-GLENN HEATH, 9/24 159472 - REGIST-GLENN HEATH 9/24 111-138317-654360-00000 0.00 1,118.00 CHECK TOTAL 54.93 CHECK TOTAL 320.00 CHECK TOTAL 6,430.88 CHECK TOTAL 350.22 CHECK TOTAL 794.28 34,692.95 CHECK TOTAL 340.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 1,118.00 1,118.00 54.93 54.93 320.00 320.00 6,430.88 6,430.88 350.22 350.22 794.28 34,692.95 35,487.23 340.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC ANT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 340.00 CHECK NO 20041360 20041361 589790 64938 158256 INSTALL.HINGE KITS 64844 158208 CLEAN DUCTS AND FANS VENDOR 246380 - FAT FREE SYSTEMS 001-122240-646110-00000 0.00 001-122240-646110-00000 0.00 619.00 450.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 619.00 450.00 1,069.00 CHECK NO 20041375 20041375 20041876 20041876 20041413 20042312 20041877 20041374 589505 VENDOR 4-347-25801 159436 SHIPPING 4-331-66738 159436 SHIPPING 4-347-23786 201314 SHIPPING 4-347-61414 201314 SHIPPING 4-345-67004 160034 SHIPPING 4-372-58507 9/3 200567 SHPG 9/3 4-343-67003 203714 SHIPPING 4-331-29249 159433 SHIPPING 6250 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 338-163650-641950-60018 0.00 338-163650-641950-60018 0.00 681-421510-641950-00000 0.00 681-421510-641950-00000 0.00 001-100130-641950-00000 0.00 001-144510-641950-00000 0.00 518-121630-641950-00000 0.00 331-163650-641950-60018 0.00 325-172977-641950-31101 0.00 5.55 10.15 27.10 21.25 24.25 9.15 18.65 39.85 10.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.55 10.15 27.10 21.25 24.25 9.15 18.65 50.45 166.55 CHECK NO 20041423 20041875 589692 4-351-59790 200002 SHIPPING 4-361-41449 201102 SHIPPING VENDOR 172870 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 001-138710-641950-00000 121-138755-641950-33024 408-210120-641950-00000 408-233312-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.55 0.00 0.00 22.55 0.00 0.00 5.55 22.55 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041421 4-370-89018 200057 SHIPPING 20041422 4-279-52159 200356 SHIPPING 20042311 4-371-24524 9/11 200057 SHPG 9/11 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-000000-142900-00000 0.00 114-178975-641950-00000 0.00 001-000000-142900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589574 20041362 736210 158194 20041362 730781 158194 20042040 730361 154836 20041362 734790 158194 VENDOR 101860 - FERGUSON ENTERPRISES PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS 001-122240-652989-00000 001-122240-652989-00000 001-122240-652989-00000 001-122240-652989-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 84.00 0.00 9.65 0.00 CHECK NO 589435 20041891 849994 AND VENDOR 110620 - FERGUSON ENTERPRISES 408-233351-655100-00000 VCHR NET 84.00 CHECK NO 589581 20041445 850530 201624 PARTS 20041444 852016 206642 PARTS 20040683 852695 200599 PARTS 20041416 852814 159877 REBUILD VLV 20041443 850109 200212 PARTS VENDOR 105760 - FERGUSON UNDERGROUND 408-253221-652990-00000 441-256110-655100-00000 408-233352-652910-00000 408-233313-652990-00000 408-253212-655100-00000 9.65 17.65 0.00 17.65 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 139.40 0.00 173.45 0.00 173.45 0.00 431.20 0.00 431.20 0.00 477.52 0.00 477.52 0.00 75.82 0.00 75.82 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 4,730.15 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.157.99 4,730.15 4,730.15 0.00 89.00 0.00 89.00 0.00 1,447.90 0.00 0.00 2.17 0.00 1,447.90 2.17 0.00 752.00 0.00 752.00 0.00 999.00 0.00 999.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041442 850804-1 200211 PARTS 20041443 852735 200212 PARTS 20041445 852677 201624 PARTS 20041442 CM041019 200211 PARTS 20041442 852514-1 200211 PARTS 20041443 852780 200212 PARTS 20040683 851576 200599 PARTS 20040682 851185-1 200212 PARTS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-253212-655100-00000 0.00 408-253212-655100-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253212-655100-00000 0.00 408-253212-655100-00000 0.00 408-253212-655100-00000 0.00 408-233352-652910-00000 0.00 408-253212-655100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 590035 VENDOR 346890 - FILE STOR 20042235 0013465 205205 STORAGE 20042236 0013462 202776 STORAGE 20041433 0013232 204302 STORAGE 20041433 0013227 204302 STORAGE 113-138312-644170-00000 0.00 001-138710-634999-00000 0.00 113-138931-634999-00000 0.00 113-138931-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041873 20041873 589753 VENDOR 214800 - FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC 17911 001-122240-646281-00000 206680 FIRE ALARM INSP, 17913 001-122240-646281-00000 206680 FIRE ALARM INSP. AMT NET VCHR DISC 53.00 0.00 PAGE 76 VCHR NET 53.00 21.06 0.00 21.06 1,016.23 0.00 312.09- 0.00 1,016.23 312.09- 763.00 0.00 763.00 41.04 0.00 41.04 81.86 0.00 81.86 375.60 0.00 375.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,329.77 195.90 0,00 195.90 11.23 0.00 11.23 928.49 0.00 928.49 656.66 0.00 656.66 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,792.28 0.00 71.00 0.00 71.00 0.00 196.59 0.00 196.59 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041873 17915 206680 FIRE ALARM INSP. 20041873 17912 206680 FIRE ALARM INSP. 20041420 17932 206680 FIRE ALARM INSP. 20041420 17931 206680 FIRE ALARM INSP. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC 001-122240-646281-00000 0.00 001-122240-646281-00000 0.00 001-122240-646281-00000 0.00 001-122240-646281-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041448 590036 VENDOR 347100 - FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSUP~ANCE CO. REF.356333 113-000000-115420-00000 REF.356333 16J I CHECK NO 20042307 20042307 20042307 589913 D.MARTINEZ 7/29/02 207210 D.MARTINEZ 7/29/02 S.HAIGHT 4/11/02 207210 S.I~AIGHT 4/11/02 J.CONYERS 6/25/02 207210 J.CONYERS 6/25/02 VENDOR 303710 - FIRST ANESTHESIA ASSOC INC 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 730.05 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 730.05 CHECK NO 20041435 20042341 20041434 20041435 20041434 589608 VENDOR 116470 - FIRST TITLE & ABSTRACT. INC. B-12625 204940 TITLE WORK 333-163650-631650-60027 02-TC-3908 207181 OWNERS POLICY 325-172977-631650-31101 B-12328/8-12323 202660 TITLE WORK 313-163673-631650-62071 B-12655 204940 TITLE WORK 333-163650-631650-60027 71.00 0.00 71.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 380.00 0.00 380.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.538.64 0.00 67.38 0.00 67.38 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 67.38 0.00 702.00 0.00 702.00 0.00 270.40 0.00 270.40 0.00 338.00 0.00 338.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,310.40 0.00 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 9.450.00 0.00 9.450.00 0.00 172.50 0.00 172.50 0.00 225.00 0.00 225.00 B-12331 313-163673-631650-62071 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 202660 TITLE WORK SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041435 B-12654 204940 TITLE WORK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 333-163650-631650-60027 0.00 CHECK NO 20041436 20041437 589595 VENDOR 111530 - FISHER SCIENTIFIC 1277506 408-233312-652990-00000 204052 SUPPL. 1306699 408-253212-652990-00000 204067 SUPPL. 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041358 589758 VENDOR 218480 - FL DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT GOODLAND PARK 306-116360-649010-80611 159816 TRANSFER OF FEE 0.00 CHECK NO 20041987 20041987 589891 VENDOR 288620 - FLA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY 21-08-0822-0-3 7/24-8/22 21-08-0822-0-3 7/24-8/22 001-041010-643400-00000 001-051020-643400-00000 001-122240-643400-00000 21-08-0824-0-1 7/24-8/22 21-08-0824-0-1 7/24-8/22 001-041010-643400-00000 001-051020-643400-00000 001-122240-643400-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041951 589852 VENDOR 273880 - FLASH EQUIPMENT, INC. 31598 521-122410-646425-00000 200627 PARTS 0.00 CHECK NO 20040673 589954 VENDOR 323960 - FLORAQUATICS, INC. 100560 109-182602-652990-00000 205640 BARE ROOT PLANTS 0.00 16J AMT NET 225.00 CHECK TOTAL 119.50 245.04 CHECK TOTAL 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 144.65 159.87 456.78 44.66 49.36 141.04 CHECK TOTAL 90.56 CHECK TOTAL 2,943.00 CHECK TOTAL 1t VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 225.00 10.397.50 119.50 245.04 364.54 50.00 50.00 761.30 235.06 996.36 90.56 90.56 2,943.00 2,943.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040684 20040685 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 589708 VENDOR 182420 - FLORIDA AERIAL SERVICES INC. 12527 414-263611-634999-73949 205454 MONTHLY AERIAL PHOTO 12533 411-273511-634999-70054 159715 8/02 AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 0.00 92.00 0.00 92,00 CHECK NO 20042237 589713 VENDOR 184860 - FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING, PAUL NARGI MMB/SHIP 113-138915-654210-00000 160231 MMB/SHIP P.I~qRGI 0.00 112.00 0.00 112.00 CHECK NO 20042292 590152 VENDOR 363800 - FLORIDA ATI.ANTIC UNIVERSITY REGIST-LYN WOOD 9/26-27 001-121710-654360-00000 160207 - REGIST-LYN WOOD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 204.00 CHECK NO 20041881 20041881 20041881 589792 G.OSTERVAL 8/12/02 201856 G.OSTERVAL 8/12/02 G.OSTERVAL 8/12/02 201856 G.OSTERVAL 8/12/02 G.OSTERVAL 8/12/02 201856 G.OSTERVAL 8/12/02 VENDOR 248020 - FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 20041989 590137 VENDOR 363460 - FLORIDA CHAPTER OF AFCC REGIST-BILL SMITH, 10/25 681-421510-654360-00000 160057 - REGIST-BILL SMITH 10/25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 20041414 589780 VENDOR 238360 - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE LIC.MARGARITE A.CRISP 001-172930-654210-00000 160029 LIC.MA CRISP 0.00 14.30 0.00 14.30 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 0.00 62.40 0.00 62.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 88.40 0.00 95.00 0.00 95.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 95.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20041359 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 590147 VENDOR 363650 - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL LF~qSE PERMIT GOODLAND 306-116360-649010-80611 159817 TRANSFER LEASE PERMIT AMT DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20041886 590062 VENDOR 352360 - FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL 870961PI 160192 SEAL & PLATE 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042234 589506 VENDOR 6670 - FLORIDA ENGINEERING SOCIETY MMB/SHIP DALE BATHON 313-163611-654210-00000 159438 MMB/SHIP D.BATHON 0.00 CHECK NO 20041447 589908 VENDOR 297630 - FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY 017 001-000000-142900-00000 207200 TRAINING 0.00 CHECK NO 20042231 20041917 20041917 20041917 20042231 20041917 20042231 589509 VENDOR 33496-39108 7/16-8/14/02 33496-39108 7/16-8/14/02 93380-95574 8/2-9/3/02 93380-95574 8/2-9/3/02 64612-30390 8/2-9/3/02 64612-30390 8/2-9/3/02 05710-94515 7/26-8/26/02 05710-94515 7/26-8/26/02 69488-10285 8/8-9/9/02 69488-10285 8/8-9/9/02 55472-44078 8/5-9/4/02 55472-44078 8/5-9/4/02 85144-11340 8/8-9/9/02 85144-11340 8/8-9/9/02 6790 - FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 144-144360-643100-00000 408-233351-643100-00000 408-233351-643100-00000 301-121125-643100-01017 473-173413-643100-00000 001-156145-643100-00000 313-163611-643100-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 200.00 CHECK TOTAL 90.66 5.00 CHECK TOTAL 267.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,750.00 CHECK TOTAL 431.47 9.19 21.67 80.12 664.96 2,707.63 227.53 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 200.00 200.00 95.66 95.66 267.00 267.00 1.750.00 1,750.00 431,47 9.19 21.67 80.12 664.96 2,707.63 227.53 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041917 20041917 20041917 20042232 20042231 20042231 20041917 20042231 20041917 20042231 20042345 20041917 20041917 20042231 20041917 20042231 20041917 DESCRIPTION 84580-86579 8/2-9/3/02 84580-86579 8/2-9/3/02 58478-43348 8/7-9/6/02 58478-43348 8/7-9/6/02 27538-70035 7/26-8/26/02 27538-70035 7/26-8/26/02 81704-51135 8/9-9/10/02 81704-51135 8/9-9/10/02 02968-36240 8/8-9/9/02 02968-36240 8/8-9/9/02 41285-39279 8/8-9/9/02 41285-39279 8/8-9/9/02 52477-53097 8/2-9/3/02 52477-53097 8/2-9/3/02 46281-90284 8/8-9/9/02 46281-90284 8/8-9/9/02 67285-11574 8/8-9/9/02 67285-11574 8/9-9/9/02 01110-99024 8/8-9/9/02 01110-99024 8/8-9/9/02 56244-74077 8/1-8/30/02 56244-74077 8/1-8/30/02 72478-62076 7/25-8/23/02 72478-62076 7/25-8/23/02 29113-35137 8/6-9/5/02 29113-35137 8/6-9/5/02 24644-18371 8/7-9/6/02 24644-18371 8/7-9/6/02 46304-11595 8/2-9/3/02 46304-11595 8/2-9/3/02 02368-36284 8/8-9/9/02 02368-36284 8/8-9/9/02 97229-32085 7/24-8/22/02 97229-32085 7/24-8/22/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 188-140480-643100-00000 0.00 301~121125-643100-01017 0.00 408-253221-643100-00000 0,00 470-173435-643100-00000 0.00 470-173442-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 473-173413-643100-00000 0.00 408-233351-643100-00000 0.00 101-163609-643100-00000 0.00 313-163611-643100-00000 0.00 408-253221-643100-00000 0.00 188-140480-643100-00000 0.00 408-253212-643100-00000 0.00 001-051020-643100-00000 0.00 111-156332-643100-00000 0.00 470-173435-643100-00000 0.00 001-157110-643100-00000 0.00 AMT NET 8.60 621.09 146.99 2,028.61 8.68 94.10 8.46 554.29 9.26 128.40 128.39 48.982.01 575.47 657.04 1,101.56 1,819.25 80.74 8.46 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 8.60 621.09 146.99 2,028.61 8.68 94.10 8.46 554.29 9.26 256.79 48,982.01 575.47 657.04 1,101.56 1,819.25 80.74 8.46 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 16J IPA~E 82 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20041917 40840-51434 7/26-8/26/02 40840-51434 7/26-8/26/02 001-122260-643100-00000 0.00 352.88 0.00 352.88 20042231 48933-09023 8/8-9/9/02 48933-09023 8/8-9/9/02 101-163609-643100-00000 0.00 313-163611-643100-00000 0.00 146.04 146.04 0.00 292.08 20041917 95030-30299 8/2-9/3/02 95030-30299 8/2-9/3/02 111-156332-643100-00000 0.00 987.76 0.00 987,76 20042231 84137-38272 8/5-9/4/02 84137-38272 8/5-9/4/02 001-156145-643100-00000 0.00 5,765.29 0.00 5,765.29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 68,501.98 CHECK NO 589628 VENDOR 131290 - FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 20041357 37778-34064/22432-31061 37778-34064/22432-31061 7/26-8/26 001-122260-643100-00000 0.00 13,847.57 0.00 13,847.57 20041357 37778-34064/22432-31061 37778-34064/22432-31061 7/26-8/26 001-051020-643100-00000 001-061010-643100-00000 001-081020-643100-00000 001-443010-643100-00000 001-454010-643100-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,142.15 9,043.65 3,202.50 2,178.61 652.32 0.00 17,219.23 20041357 37778-34064/22432-31061 37778-34064/22432-31061 7/26-8/26 001-000000-155900-00000 0.00 1,185.11 0.00 1,185.11 20041357 37778-34064/22432-31061 37778-34064/22432-31061 7/26-8/26 001-041010-643100-00000 001-155810-643100-00000 0.00 0.00 5,947.33 6,149.24 0.00 12,096.57 20041357 37778-34064/22432-31061 37778-34064/22432-31061 7/26-8/26 408-210155-643100-00000 470-173410-643100-00000 114-178975-643100-00000 408-210105-643100-00000 490-144610-643100-00000 516-121650-643100-00000 517-121640-643100-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 677.55 581.92 764.08 1,476.66 771.17 65.16 130.16 0.00 4,466.70 20041357 37778-34064/22432-31061 37778-34064/22432-31061 7/26-8/26 518-121630-643100-00000 681-410510-643100-00000 681-410710-643100-00000 681-421510-643100-00000 681-431310-643100-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 147.38 233.81 232.13 7,923.02 625.49 0.00 9,161.83 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20040672 590108 VENDOR 362000 - FLORIDA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 120 001-156363-646314-00000 159039 DEBRIS REMOVAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20042060 589917 VENDOR 305020 - FLORIDA RESEARCH, INC 104860 470-173410-634999-00000 201233 CLIPPING SVS 0.00 CHECK NO 20040675 20040674 20041441 20040668 20040668 20040675 20040675 20040668 20040675 20040675 20040675 589599 1140017029 200809 LIMEROCK 1140016977 201972 LIMEROCK 1550000874 206001 LIMEROCK 1140017316 206001LIMEROCK 1140016980 206001LIMEROCK 1140017098 200809 LIMEROCK 1140017314 200809 LIMEROCK 1140017210 206001 LIMEROCK 1140017260 200809 LIMEROCK 1550000848 200809 LIMEROCK 1140017230 200809 LIMEROCK VENDOR 112450 - FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES 111-163645-653110-00000 313-163673-763100-66066 111-163645-763110-00000 111-163645-763110-00000 111-163645-763110-00000 111-163645-653110-00000 111-163645-653110-00000 111-163645-763110-00000 111-163645-653110-00000 111-163645-653110-00000 111-163645-653110-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 990.00 CHECK TOTAL 59.00 CHECK TOTAL 235.94 184.50 972.07 77.21 2.052.91 21.18 709.02 152.55 503.40 34.93 392.27 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 57,977.01 990.00 990.00 59.00 59. O0 235.94 184.50 972.07 77.21 2,052.91 21.18 709.02 152.55 503.40 34.93 392.27 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041439 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 1140017401 200809 LIMEROCK 20040675 1140017315 200809 LIMEROCK 20040668 1140016978 206001 LIMEROCK 20040668 1140016950 206001 LIMEROCK 20040674 1140016979 201972 LIMEROCK 20040675 1140017121 200809 LIMEROCK 20040675 1140017073 200809 LIMEROCK 20040675 1140016949 200809 LIMEROCK 20040668 1140017360 206001LIMEROCK 20040668 1140017030 206001 LIMEROCK 20040675 1550000866 200809 LIMEROCK 20041440 1140017402 205006 LIMEROCK 20040668 1140017074 206001 LIMEROCK 111-163645-653110-00000 0.00 111-163645-653110-00000 0.00 111-163645-763110-00000 0.00 111-163645-763110-00000 0.00 313-163673-763100-66066 0.00 111-163645-653110-00000 0.00 111-163645-653110-00000 0.00 111-163645-653110-00000 0.00 111-163645-763110-00000 0.00 111-163645-763110-00000 0.00 111-163645-653110-00000 0.00 313-163673-763100-60016 0.00 111-163645-763110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041446 590042 VENDOR 347960 - FLORIDA SEALING PRODUCTS, INC 024601 408-233352-652910-00000 203092 SEALS 0.00 CHECK NO 589833 VENDOR 264140 - FLORIDA SHERIFF'S SELF-INSURANCE AMT NET VCHR DISC 162.56 0.00 VCHR NET 162.56 84.59 0.00 84.59 1,709.88 0.00 2,221.22 0.00 1,709.88 2,221.22 119.08 0.00 119.08 307.14 0.00 307.14 244.62 0.00 244.62 157.89 0.00 157.89 799.48 0.00 799.48 1,300.46 0.00 1,300.46 68.84 0.00 68.84 489.90 0.00 489.90 82.28 0.00 82.28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,660.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13,083.92 3,660.00 3,660.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042342 FSM-030026 207173 COVERAGE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 516-121650-645910-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589633 VENDOR 135230 - FLORIDA STATE UNDERGROUND. INC 20042134 #12 REVISED 8/19/02 411-273511-763100-70862 102895 TO 7/25/02 20042134 #12 RETAINAGE 411-000000-205100-00000 102895 TO 7/25/02 RETAINAGE 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041438 589817 VENDOR 258610 - FLORIDA TOOL & FASTENER 110663-00 408-253211-652990-00000 201793 SUPPL. CHECK NO 20041866 589787 VENDOR 243280 - FLORIDA WATER SERVICES 009815855-3 441-256110-655900-00000 009815855-3 AMT NET VCHR DISC 25.000.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303698 590178 VENDOR 900050 - FONES-4-U REF.FONES-4-U 9/02 REF.FONES-4-U OV/PMT 199-611040-314210-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20040679 589746 VENDOR 204170 - FORESTRY RESOURCES 603084 198-157440-646314-00000 159451 MULCH 8.181.94 0.00 CHECK NO 20041892 590033 VENDOR 346390 - FORT BEND SERVICES 99934 408-233312-652310-00000 204109 POLYMER 818.19- 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 ~ PAGEt 85 VCHR NET 25.000.00 25.000.00 8.181.94 818.19- 7,363.75 0.00 79.74 0.00 79.74 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 79.74 16.796.12 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16.796.12 16,796.12 0.00 3.00 0,00 3.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3.00 0.00 240.29 0.00 240.29 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 240.29 8.467.20 0.00 8.467.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8,467.20 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 590082 20040899 572775 205854 PARTS 20040687 572381 205854 PARTS 20040687 572327 205854 PARTS 20040687 572481 205854 PARTS 20040899 572538 205854 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VENDOR 358110 - FREIGHTLINER TRUCKS-SW FL 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041369 590011 VENDOR 341460 - FTCSAA, LAUP~A PEPIN, CO-CHAIR REG.NICOLE GOETZ 681-421510-654360-00000 160058 REG.NICOLE GOETZ 0.00 CHECK NO 20040688 589745 VENDOR 203680 - FUEL TECH INC. 021592 495-192370-646410-00000 202044 REPAIRS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041880 589998 VENDOR 338500 - FUNKY FISH KIDS DAY 194 206107 FIELD TRIP 130-157710-634999-00000 001-156363-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042097 20042112 20042108 589987 801185 202113 UNIFROMS 803678 200774 UNIFORMS 802800 200420 UNIFORMS VENDOR 333980 - G&K SERVICES 001-172930-652130-00000 408-233351-652130-00000 408-253221-652130-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.05 174.32 47.20 101.89 701.62 CHECK TOTAL 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 61.07 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 493.00 CHECK TOTAL 69.81 333.97 69.72 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 18.05 174.32 47.20 101.89 701.62 1,043.08 60.00 60.00 61.07 61.07 493.00 493.00 69.81 333.97 69.72 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042111 803686 200612 UNIFORMS 20042112 799618 200774 UNIFORMS 20042097 926838 202113 UNIFROMS 20042099 792298 201478 UNIFORMS 20042099 800391 201478 UNIFORMS 20042099 796345 201478 UNIFORMS 20042112 807736 200774 UNIFORMS 20042117 803684 200658 UNIFORMS 20042107 799609 200384 UNIFORMS 20041971 815871 159985 UIFORM SERV 20042104 800379 201124 UNIFORMS 20042098 799616 206697 UNIFORMS 20042099 788258 201478 UNIFORMS 20041972 811800 160048 UNIFORM SERV 20042097 793094 202113 UNIFROMS 20042117 807742 200658 UNIFORMS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233312-652130-00000 0.00 408-233351-652130-00000 0.00 001-172930-652130-00000 0.00 111-156381-652130-00000 0.00 111-156381-634999-00000 0.00 111-156381-652130-00000 0.00 111-156381-634999-00000 0.00 111-156381-652130-00000 0.00 111-156381-634999-00000 0.00 408-233351-652130-00000 0.00 408-233313-652130-00000 0.00 408-253211-652130-00000 0.00 001-155410-652130-00000 0,00 470-173442-652130-00000 0.00 101-163630-652130-00000 0.00 111-156381-652130-00000 0.00 111-156381-634999-00000 0,00 001-155410-652130-00000 0.00 001-172930-652130-00000 0.00 408-233313-652130-00000 0,00 AMT NET 177.12 334.68 60.00- 4.03 1.44 4.05 1.44 4.03 1.44 406.94 17.17 92.67 36.58 12,54 48.71 4,03 1.44 36.58 69.45 27.17 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 177.12 334.68 60,00- 5.47 5.49 5.47 406.94 17.17 92.67 36.58 12.54 48.71 5.47 36.58 69.45 27.17 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042097 797135 202113 UNIFROMS 20042111 807744 200612 UNIFORMS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-172930-652130-00000 0.00 408-233312-652130-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 590002 VENDOR 339190 - G&K SERVICES 20042110 803674 201234 UNIFORMS 20042113 800360 200954 UNIFORMS 20042110 795564 201234 UNIFORMS 20042110 79614 201234 UNIFORMS 20042113 801186 200954 UNIFORMS 20042109 802785 201127 UNIFORMS 001-122240-652130-00000 0.00 521-122410-652130-00000 0.00 001-122240-652130-00000 0.00 001-122240-652130-00000 0.00 521-122410-652130-00000 0.00 101-163620-652130-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303717 590179 VENDOR 900050 - G,L, HOMESHEZ REFUND WTR METER PERMIT GL HOMES WTR METER PERMIT REFUND 113-000000-115420-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042118 20042118 20042118 20042118 589512 VENDOR 11104764 207193 BOOKS 11669572 207193 BOOKS 674480 207193 BOOKS 674481 207193 BOOKS 7400 - GALE RESEARCH COMPANY 355-156190-766100-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-00000 0.00 AMT NET 69.75 132.65 CHECK TOTAL 110.10 4.86 118.74 114,16 105,57 24.22 CHECK TOTAL 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 44.17 130.29 161.50- 161.50- 163 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 69,75 132.65 1,897.41 110.10 4.86 118.74 114.16 105.57 24.22 477.65 50.00 50.00 44.17 130,29 161,50- 161.50- SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042118 11698800 207193 BOOKS 20042118 11696704 207193 BOOKS 20042118 11738416 207193 BOOKS 20042118 11686216 207193 BOOKS 20042118 11737298 207193 BOOKS 20042118 11723261 207193 BOOKS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355-156190-766100-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-00000 0.00 355-156190-766100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589587 VENDOR 108940 - GALLS, INC. 20041977 558882080101 156041 CROSS 146-144380-652120-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303716 590180 VENDOR 900050 - GAPSS INCCHEZ REFUND PERMIT CNX GAPSS INC PERMIT REFUND 113-138900-322110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041965 589932 VENDOR 314410 - GARDEN ST. PAPER PRODUCTS CORP. 5192 470-173442-652990-00000 159951 BALE WIRE 0.00 CHECK NO 20042101 589696 VENDOR 173740 - GASTROENTEROLOGY GROUP OF NAPLES PA 8/12 A MC GEE 001-155930-631210-00000 201857 MED. 0.00 CHECK NO 590106 VENDOR 361900 - GASTROENTEROLOGY SPECIALISTS AMT NET 130.29 413.34 44.17 223.15 274.06 386.61 CHECK TOTAL 34.96 CHECK TOTAL 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 288.00 CHECK TOTAL 27.95 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~GE 89 VCHR NET 130.29 413.34 44.17 223.15 274.06 386.61 1,323.08 34.96 34.96 100.00 100.00 288.00 288. O0 27.95 27.95 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041981 O. ARIZABALETA W3053 160117 MED SERV COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589511 20041976 312147 159783 20041978 306781 159008 20041959 312509 159914 20042095 315968 159916 VENDOR 7390 - GAYLORD BROS., INC. 198-157430-652990-00000 ARCHIVAL SUPPLIES ARCIVAL SUPPLIES ARCHIVAL SUPPLIES ARCHIVAL PAPER 0.00 198-157430-652990-00000 0.00 198-157430-652990-00000 0.00 198-157430-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589510 20041983 298135 160068 20042114 297791 201227 20042114 303563 201227 20042114 297791 201227 20042114 304623 201227 20042114 298134 201227 VENDOR 7320 - GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC. 001-156130-652610-00000 001-156145-652610-00000 BOOK LABELING 129-156110-652610-33774 BOOKS 129-156110-652610-33774 BOOKS 129-156110-652610-33775 BOOKS 129-156110-652610-33774 BOOKS 129-156110-652610-33774 BOOKS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589799 20041961 12618 159978 VENDOR 254810 - GBSI DATA PROCESSING 111-100210-631990-00000 0.00 AMT NET 44.20 CHECK TOTAL 165.80 236.82 86.29 49.48 CHECK TOTAL 107.00 13.40 40.25 810.00 46.55 5.60 140.00 CHECK TOTAL 800.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I tAGE VCHR NET 44.20 44.20 165.80 236.82 86.29 49.48 538.39 120.40 40.25 810.00 46.55 5.60 140.00 1,162.80 800.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 800.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20041740 DESCRIPTION 590144 VENDOR 363620 - GERALD VITALE CLOSING 207228 CLOSING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 303715 338-163650-761100-60018 0.00 2,998.30 0.00 2,998.30 CHECK NO 20041964 590181 VENDOR 900050 - GL HOMES OF MAPLES REFUND OVERAGE PERMITS 113-000000-115420-00000 G ATKINSON GL HOMES BUILDING CORP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,998.30 CHECK NO 20042115 20042115 20042115 590094 VENDOR 360450 - GLOBAL ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS 01335354 518-121630-654110-00000 518-121630-641950-00000 159414 DOC ISEA VENDOR 7740 - GOLDEN GATE ANIMAL CLINIC 610-155410-631970-00000 610-155410-631970-00000 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 39.30 0.00 39.30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 39.30 0.00 72.00 0.00 13.53 0.00 85.53 CHECK NO 20042116 20042116 20041970 20041982 20042116 589513 02-10334 H PROTOS 200975 SPAY/NEUTER 02-10008 C CARSON 200975 SPAY/NEUTER H PROTOS 02-10332 200975 SPAY/NEUTER 589514 VENDOR 76045 200836 TURF 76005 200836 TURF 8/21/02 159929 HAY 75835 160185 COSTAL HAY 7770 - GOLDEN GATE NURSERY 111-163645-646314-00000 111-163645-646314-00000 001-155410-652210-00000 001-155410-652210-00000 111-163645-646314-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 85.53 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 195.00 76039 200836 TURF 0.00 190.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 156.00 0.00 156.00 0.00 112.50 0.00 112.50 0.00 95.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 190.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041957 76239 159966 TURF 20042116 76009 200836 TURF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BO~uRD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155410-652210-00000 0.00 111-163645-646314-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589691 20042105 17242 202000 VENDOR 171810 - GOLDEN GATE POOL SUPPLIES INC. 111-156313-652311-00000 111-156313-652990-00000 POOL SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041986 589515 VENDOR 7830 - GOLDEN GATE WELL DRILLING & WATER WELL PERMIT 338546 113-138900-322270-00000 G G WELL DRILLING REFUND WELL PERMIT 0.00 CHECK NO 20041633 590032 VENDOR 346350 - GOODLE1-FE ARMS 239 262 3229 436 DATA LIN 129-156110-634999-33015 239 262 3229 436 DATA LINE 0.00 CHECK NO 20041969 20041954 20041969 20041969 20041954 20041969 589701 VENDOR 178630 - GP, AINGER 287 049937 9 158412 SUPPLIES 483 694025 6 159278 SUPPLIES 001 049936 6 158412 SUPPLIES 287 049937 158412 SUPPLIES 287 953761 8 159278 SUPPLIES 287 298180 4 158412 SUPPLIES 408-233312-652990-00000 101-163620-646610-00000 408-233312-652990-00000 408-233312-652990-00000 101-163620-646610-00000 408-233312-652990-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AJ,IT NET 17.90 95.00 CHECK TOTAL 148.40 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 37.50 CHECK TOTAL 59.99 CHECK TOTAL 60.00 832.14 799.25 9.00 161.76- 45.24- VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 17.90 95.00 856.40 148.40 148.40 37.50 37.50 59.99 59.99 60.00 832.14 799.25 9.00 161.76- 45.24- SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041954 287 982990 7 159278 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163620-646610-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042042 589885 VENDOR 285690 - GRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY, INC. 302845 206630 LIBRARY CARDS 129-156110-652610-33775 001-156110-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042220 589783 VENDOR 239140 - GREAT AMERICA LEASING CORPORATION 2634690 111-156310-644620-00000 204514 LEASING COPIER 0.00 CHECK NO 20042126 20041412 20041410 20041411 20042127 20042128 589638 120836 206216 TO 8/9/02 120842 205703 TO 8/9/02 120837 204747 TO 8/9/02 120839 204970 TO 8/9/02 120843 205958 TO 8/9/02 120838 204746 TO 8/9/02 VENDOR 138810 - GREELEY & HANSEN 413-263611-763100-73945 413-263611-763100-73945 411-273511-631400-70054 411-273511-631400-70892 413-263611-763100-73945 413-263611-631400-73066 413-263611-631400-73948 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041949 20041949 589584 959348 207024 959683 207024 VENDOR 106780 - GREGORY COURT REPORTING 113-138900-634999-00000 COURT REPORTING 113-138900-634999-00000 COURT REPORTING 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 146.40 CHECK TOTAL 3,667.93 52.27 CHECK TOTAL 393.97 CHECK TOTAL 14,611,00 1,704.00 10,260.00 24,760.50 27.078.00 14.936.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 158.30 538.95 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.. VCHR NET 146.40 1.639.79 3,720.20 3.720.20 393.97 393.97 14,611.00 1.704.00 10,260,00 24,760.50 27,078.00 14,936.00 93.349.50 158.30 538.95 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041949 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 959370 207024 COURT REPORTING 20041949 959388 207024 20041949 658544 207024 20041984 20041949 COURT REPORTING COURT REPORTING 960344 01-2491 3 WHIPPLE 958923 207024 COURT REPORTING 20041949 959365 207024 COURT REPORTING 690541 02-1025 DENISE VARBLE 20041985 113-138900-634999-00000 0.00 113-138900-634999-00000 0.00 113-138900-634999-00000 0.00 681-410310-634406-00000 0.00 113-138900-634999-00000 0.00 113-138900-634999-00000 0.00 681-410310-634406-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041962 589742 334371 160053 VENDOR 202580 - GREY HOUSE PUBLISHING 307-156110-766100-00000 PUBLICATION CHECK NO 20042300 589844 VENDOR 272370 - GREYSTONE MOBILE HOME PARK W4362 JEANETT L CP~qVEN 001-155930-634153-00000 JEANETTE CRACEN RENT AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 664.00 0.00 664,00 CHECK NO 20042106 589910 VENDOR 299230 - GUARDIAN PERSONAL STORAGE C1-7 UNIT 118-144210-644170-33781 202558 STORAGE 242.10 0.00 242.10 CHECK NO 20041963 589969 117377 159446 VENDOR 327620 - GULF ICE SYSTEMS INC. 521-122410-764990-00000 COOLER 298.45 0.00 298.45 30.00 0.00 30.00 389.65 0.00 389.65 211.80 0.00 211.80 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,593,25 0.00 179.50 0.00 179.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 179.50 0,00 220.00 0,00 220,00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 220.00 0.00 216.00 0.00 216.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 216.00 0.00 932.00 0.00 932.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 932.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20041739 DESCRIPTION 590143 VENDOR 363610 - GUS DEMUZIO CLOSING 207227 CLOSING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET 338-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 20042207 589912 VENDOR 302880 - HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER #7 FINAL 121-138755-882100-33024 203870 FINAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20041968 20041967 589849 VENDOR 273200 - HACH COMPANY 3166477 157584 CHEM 3155089 158410 CARTRIDGE 408-233350-652310-00000 408-233312-652310-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041975 589774 VENDOR 232340 - HARLEQUIN SALES GROUP 25088 355-156190-766100-00000 159876 BOOKS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041952 589516 VENDOR 8360 - HARRINGTON'S PROF. ARTS PHARMACY 7/19-8/9 001-155930-652710-00000 207154 RX'S (17) 0.00 CHECK NO 20042201 590019 VENDOR 343540 - HDR CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORP #1 205614 5/28-6/30/02 331-163650-631400-65041 313-163673-631400-65041 414-263611-631400-73065 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041979 589992 VENDOR 335760 - HEALTH ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS 02 1557 517-121640-652990-00000 159928 PROGRAM 0.00 2.998.29 CHECK TOTAL 45,898.60 CHECK TOTAL 238.44 791.60 CHECK TOTAL 11.96 CHECK TOTAL 1.162.84 CHECK TOTAL 23.315.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 138.03 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 2.998.29 2,998.29 45,898.60 45.898.60 238.44 791.60 1.030.04 11.96 11.96 1.162.84 1.162.84 23.315.00 23.315.00 138.03 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 303747 590182 VENDOR 900050 HEIDI SELF REFUND FLAG FOOTBALL REFUND FLAS FOOTBALL H SELF 001-156341-347270-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042100 589949 VENDOR 322600 22725800 159902 CHEM HELENA CHEMCAL, CO. 001-172930-652310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041953 589517 VENDOR 22725693 206972 CHEM 8430 HELENA CHEMICAL CO 101-163620-652310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042091 589795 VENDOR 251890 8/1-30 TRVL H.HARTNACK 8/1-30 TRVL H.HARTNACK HERIBERTO HARTNACK 001-155230-640200-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041966 590056 VENDOR 350490 07456 154459 DESIGN TIME HERMAN MILLER WORKPLACE RESOURCE 111-178980-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042302 590065 VENDOR 353870 07467 206133 FURNITURE HERMAN MILLER WORKPLACE RESOURCE 473-173413-764310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041960 589518 VENDOR 8610 HILL DONNELLY CORP 5340 0432 111-138911-654110-00000 159137 DIRECTORY 2001 BOOK 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 195.00 CHECK TOTAL 5.995.50 CHECK TOTAL 75.40 CHECK TOTAL 880.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,527.81 CHECK TOTAL 110.57 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 138.03 30.00 30.00 195.00 195.00 5,995.50 5,995.50 75.40 75.40 880.00 880.00 1,52 7.81 1,527.81 110.57 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 110.57 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20040533 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 590038 VENDOR 347490 - HISTORIC PRESERVATION SERVICES /RREXP 198-157440-647210-00000 159453 PHOTO PROCESSING AMT DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20042209 20041408 589519 VENDOR 8810 - HOLE MONTES AND ASSOC INC 44183 313-163673-631400-65041 101622 TO 7/26/02 43287 334-163650-631990-60134 205044 2/23-3/29/02 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303729 590207 VENDOR 900140 - HOLIDAY INN HARBORSIDE 1665 BOBBY ROGERS 2/21 681-421190-634405-00000 1665 BOBBBY ROGERS 2/21 0.00 CHECK NO 20041063 589675 VENDOR 164250 - HOME DEPOT 2070981 201486 SUPPLIES 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041722 589876 VENDOR 281640 - HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 1211787 191-138785-884100-33752 M. VALDEZ 62156040004 207096 0.00 CHECK NO 20042301 20042301 590087 VENDOR 359350 - HOMEWOOD RESIDENCE AT NAPLES M GUNTLE 7/23-8/2 123-155972-634104-34660 206280 D RESIDENCE AT NAPLES 01 123-155972-634104-34660 206280 D RESIDENCE AT NAPLES 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 590085 VENDOR 358960 - HOOLIHAN INC. AMT NET 182.85 CHECK TOTAL 825.92 653.75 CHECK TOTAL 1,521.00 CHECK TOTAL 8.20 CHECK TOTAL 1,184.98 CHECK TOTAL 600.00 2,500.00 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 P.~GE VCHR NET 182.85 182.85 825.92 653,75 1,479.67 1,521.00 1,521.00 8.20 8.20 1,184.98 1,184.98 600.00 2.500.00 3,100.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK NO 590038 VENDOR 347490 - HISTORIC PRESERVATION SERVICES 20040533 /RREXP 159453 PHOTO PROCESSING 198-157440-647210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042209 20041408 589519 VENDOR 8810 - HOLE MONTES AND ASSOC INC 44183 313-163673-631400-65041 101622 TO 7/26/02 43287 334-163650-631990-60134 205044 2/23-3/29/02 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303729 590207 VENDOR 900140 - HOLIDAY INN HARBORSIDE 1665 BOBBY ROGERS 2/21 681-421190-634405-00000 1665 BOBBBY ROGERS 2/21 0.00 CHECK NO 20041063 589675 VENDOR 164250 - HOME DEPOT 2070981 201486 SUPPLIES 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041722 589876 VENDOR 281640 - HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 1211787 191-138785-884100-33752 M. VALDEZ 62156040004 207096 0.00 CHECK NO 20042301 20042301 590087 VENDOR 359350 - HOMEWOOD RESIDENCE AT NAPLES M GUNTLE 7/23-8/2 123-155972-634104-34660 206280 D RESIDENCE AT NAPLES 01 123-155972-634104-34660 206280 D RESIDENCE AT NAPLES 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 590085 VENDOR 358960 - HOOLIHAN INC. 182.85 CHECK TOTAL 825.92 653.75 CHECK TOTAL 1,521.00 CHECK TOTAL 8.20 CHECK TOTAL 1,184.98 CHECK TOTAL 600.00 2,500.00 CHECK TOTAL 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.. PAGE VCHR NET 182.85 182.85 825.92 653.75 1,479.67 1,521.00 1,521.00 8.20 8.20 1,184.98 1,184.98 600.00 2,500.00 3,100. O0 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042306 129066 1599198 PACK AND DELIVER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 198-157430-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589870 20042103 5348 206628 VENDOR 279710 - HORVATH ELECTRIC MOTORS 114-178975-652910-00000 ELECTRIC MOTORS 0.00 CHECK NO 589975 20041955 8/20 159700 VENDOR 330140 - HP EXPRESS SERVICE 001-157110-649990-00000 SERVICE 0.00 CHECK NO 20041057 20040534 589520 VENDOR 9020 - HYDRAULIC HOSE AND EQUIP 099519 521-122410-646425-00000 202312 099617 521-122410-646425-00000 159706 SWIVEL AND GOLF CUl~-ING EQUIP 0,00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041974 590048 VENDOR 348900 - IFAS COMMUNICATION SERVICES M082101 001-157110-647110-00000 159696 BUSINESS CARDS 0.00 CHECK NO 20042087 589455 VENDOR 181960 - IFMA REGIST-SKIP C~J~P 10/5-9 AND 001-122240-640300-00000 001-122240-654360-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041980 590006 VENDOR 339530 - IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 12163549 681-421510-646710-00000 160032 SERV ON FAX MACH 0,00 AMI' NET 395.00 CHECK TOTAL 690.00 CHECK TOTAL 549.00 CHECK TOTAL 429.55 16.78 CHECK TOTAL 40.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 785.00 CHECK TOTAL 130.95 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 395.00 395.00 690.00 690.00 549.00 549.00 429.55 16.78 446,33 40.00 40.00 785. O0 785.00 130.95 CHECK TOTAL O. 00 130.95 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 303714 DESCRIPTION 590183 VENDOR 900050 - ILENS SANCHEZ REFUND DARATE CLASS I SANCHEZ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET 111-156390-347990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042197 590069 VENDOR 354520 - IMMOKALEE BULLETIN 10/3/02 001-157110-654110-00000 159981 SUBSCRIP. RENEW 0.00 CHECK NO 20042305 20042102 20039896 20042102 20042102 589521 VENDOR 114 9/1-9/30 114 9/1-9/30 464 6/1-6/30 464 6/1-6/30 484 8/2 484 8/2 464 9/1-9/30 464 9/1-9/30 464 6/1/-6/30 464 6/1-6/30 9180 - IMMOKALEE DISPOSAL CO 001-061010-643300-00000 495-192330-643300-00000 111-156334-643300-00000 DISPOSAL DISPOSAL 495-192330-643300-00000 495-192330-643300-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20040171 20040171 20040171 20040171 20040171 589647 2104011800 2104011800 2126060700 2126060700 2126066400 2126066400 2111161500 2111161500 2126066400 2126066400 VENDOR 147920 - IMMOKALEE WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 7/24-8/26 7/24-8/26 7/17-8/16 7/17-8/16 6/17-7/17 6/17-7/17 6/12-7/11 6/12-7/11 7/17-8/16 7/17-8/16 111-156334-643400o00000 111-156334-643400-00000 111-156334-643400-00000 111-156334-643400-00000 111-156334-643400-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 40.00 CHECK TOTAL 595.81 62.76 325.32 188.98 56.22 CHECK TOTAL 10.05 8.93 81.25 998.13 78.17 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 60.00 60.00 40.00 40.00 595.81 62.76 325.32 188.98 56.22 1.229.09 10.05 8.93 81.25 998.13 78.17 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20042170 20042170 590110 VENDOR 362160 - IMSOFTECH, INC. 10593-REGIST TAMMY SMITH 001-121148-654360-00000 207233 - USERS CONF-TAMMY SMITH 10593-REGIST P.LAVALLEE 001-121148-654360-00000 207233 - USERS CONF P.LAVALLEE 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042303 20042304 590153 VENDOR 363870 - INCURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT 17300 516-121650-645910-00000 160279 INSURANCE 17299 516-121650-645910-00000 160276 INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 590139 VENDOR 363550 - INDEPENDENT TITLE & JESUS SOLORIO 20042119 D/P J.SOLORIO 35642200000 191-138785-884100-44200 J. SOLORIO 35642200000 207263 0.00 CHECK NO 589522 VENDOR 9270 - INDUSTRIAL AIR PRODUCTS 20041958 41959 001-155410-652720-00000 159927 AIR PRODUCTS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041318 589904 VENDOR 296020 - INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS 2057749 7/14 001-000000-202800-00000 2057749 7/14 0.00 CHECK NO 20041956 20041956 590102 VENDOR 361230 - IRON AGE SAFETY SHOES 1280768 473-173413-641950-00000 158866 SAFETY SHOES 1272778 473-173413-641950-00000 158866 SAFETY SHOES 0.00 0.00 AMI' NET CHECK TOTAL 350.00 350.00 CHECK TOTAL 211.00 644.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,500.00 CHECK TOTAL 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 10.03 CHECK TOTAL 92.17- 99.58 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 : PAGE 100 VCHR NET 1,176.53 350.00 350.00 700.00 211.00 644.00 855.00 2,500.00 2,500. O0 15.00 15.00 10.03 10.03 92.17- 99.58 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041950 617024P IRON AGE SAFETY SHOES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-163646-652140-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303727 590160 VENDOR 900030 - IRVING BERZON 9/5-6 TRVL IRVING BERZON 9/5-6 TRVL IRVING BERZON 470-173410-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041973 590121 62 159760 VENDOR 362770 - ISA - FLORIDA CHAPTER 001-157110-654110-00000 001-157110-641950-00000 LITERATURE CHECK NO 20042122 590119 VENDOR 362720 - ISLAND TITLE & GABRIEL CASSEUS D/P G.CASSEUS 25577800983 191-138785-884100-44200 G.CASSEUS 25577800983 207098 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1,069.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042121 590120 VENDOR 362730 - ISLAND TITLE & ROSA VALTIERRA D/P R.VLTRR 25577800284 191-138785-884100-44200 R. VALTIERRA 207151 25577800284 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20041236 590001 VENDOR 339070 - J&J WHOLESALE NURSERY 1626 322-183825-646320-00000 201994 PLANTS CHECK NO 20041335 589673 VENDOR 163520 - J. DANIEL LABS. M.D. J CONYERS 8/6-21/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160118 J CONYERS 8/6-21/02 PAGE 101 CHECK NO 589926 VENDOR 309480 - J. HEITMANN & R. PETERSEN, MD VCHR NET 1.069.00 1.076.41 79.18 0.00 79.18 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 89.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 79.18 97.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 97.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,000,00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5.000.00 5.000.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 637.00 0.00 637.00 0.00 637.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 661.80 0.00 661.80 0.00 661.80 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041334 B DRUGE 8/12/02 160119 B DRUGE 8/12/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041326 20042142 589773 VENDOR 231810 - J. M. TODD COMPANY 84144 101-163620-651910-00000 159853 FAX 84076 408-233352-764360-00000 207153 COPIER PAGE 102 , AMT NET VCHR DISC 71,50 0.00 CHECK NO 20041757 20041757 20041757 20041757 20041757 20041757 20041757 20041757 589528 VENDOR 10570 - J. W. CP~qFT 36126 201970 SVS 8/4-31/02 36130 201970 SVS 8/4-31/02 36129 201970 SVS 8/4-31/02 36133 201970 SVS 8/4-31/02 36132 201970 SVS 8/4-31/02 36127 201970 SVS 8/4-31/02 36131 201970 SVS 8/4-31/02 36134 201970 SVS 8/4-31/02 111-156332-644600-00000 111-156332-644600-00000 111-156334-644600-00000 111-156334-644600-00000 111-156334-644600-00000 111-156332-644600-00000 111-156332-644600-00000 111-156332-644600-00000 VCHR NET 71.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 71.50 0.00 695.00 0.00 695.00 2,710.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0,00 2,710.00 3,405.00 CHECK NO 20041193 20041192 589640 VENDOR 139990 - J.C. DRAINFIELD 7786 001-122240-652994-00000 201288 SVS 7761 408-233351-634999-00000 201107 SVS 0.00 235.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 0,00 140.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 650.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 589772 VENDOR 231020 - 3.M. TODD COMPANY 20041194 83462 204044 8/28-9/27 101-163620-764360-00000 20041197 83429 203692 7/29-8/28 669-100220-646710-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 590017 VENDOR 343350 - J.W. CPd%FT 20042161 36123 160145 SYNERGY 001-122240-644600-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589525 VENDOR 20041345 74417 206185 SUPPLIES 20041191 02492 204829 SUPPLIES 20041191 02483 204829 SUPPLIES 20041190 02409 206699 SUPPLIES 20041211 01825 206124 SUPPLIES 20041345 74189 206185 SUPPLIES 20041755 02435 206090 SUPPLIES 20041211 01865 206124 SUPPLIES 20041345 74428 206185 SUPPLIES 20041755 01867 206090 SUPPLIES 9540 - 3ACK AND ANN'S FEED 111-156334-652990-00000 101-163620-652990-00000 101-163620-652990-00000 111-156349-652910-00000 111-156349-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 111-156334-652990-00000 495-192330-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 111-156334-652990-00000 495-192330-652990-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 241.00 62.35 CHECK TOTAL 210. O0 CHECK TOTAL 41.45 3.95 48.12 0.00 440.99 16.77 32.67 13.09 8.88 3.99 4.49 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PA~E 103 VCHR NET 685.00 241.00 62.35 303.35 210.00 210.00 41.45 3.95 48.12 440.99 16.77 32.67 13.09 8.88 3.99 4.49 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041191 02490 204829 SUPPLIES 20041211 01663 206124 SUPPLIES 20041211 74559 206124 SUPPLIES 20041345 74166 206185 SUPPLIES 20041345 74329 206185 SUPPLIES 20042148 02714 206124 SUPPLIES 20041211 01809 206124 SUPPLIES 20042148 02756 206124 SUPPLIES 20042225 02723 206699 SUPPLIES 20041211 01802 206124 SUPPLIES 20042148 02743 206124 SUPPLIES 20041345 01666 206185 SUPPLIES 20041211 01928 206124 SUPPLIES 20041211 01765 206124 SUPPLIES 20041755 01962 206090 SUPPLIES 20041755 02317 206090 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163620-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 111-156334-652990-00000 0.00 111-156334-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 111-156349-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 111-156334-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 495-192330-652990-00000 0.00 495-192330-652990-00000 0.00 AMT NET 3.95 2.58 2.69 4.81 17.98 19.08 35.62 8.21 45.33 196.30 43.29 194.52 11.44 25.28 1.90 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 3.95 2.58 2.69 4.81 17.98 19.08 35.62 8.21 45.33 196.30 43,29 194.52 11.44 25.28 1.90 5.94 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,233.32 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 589592 VENDOR 109260 - SACQUELINE SILANO 20041756 4/9/02 GG 136-162590-649990-00000 0.00 203922 GG SVS 20041756 7/9/02 GG 136-162590-649990-00000 0.00 203922 GG SVS 7/9 20041756 5/14/02 GG 136-162590-649990-00000 0.00 203922 GG SVS 5/14/02 CHECK NO 20041346 590136 VENDOR 363430 - JAMES DENNIS MCGEE MOVING EXP-J MCGEE 408-210155-528100-00000 159763 MOVING EXP-J MCGEE 0.00 CHECK NO 20042337 20042337 20042337 590077 VENDOR 357690 - JAMES DUNCAN AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 1156 346-156310-631990-00000 205738 CONSULT SVS 1182 346-156310-631990-00000 205738 CONSULT SVS 1171 346-156310-631990-00000 205738 CONSULT SVS 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041202 20041202 20041208 20041202 20041208 589609 79647 201286 PARTS 79741 201286 PARTS 79774 201286 PARTS 79666 201286 PARTS 79810 201286 PARTS VENDOR 116700 - JAMESON SUPPLY INC. 001-122240-652995-00000 001-122240-652995-00000 001-122240-652995-00000 001-122240-652995-00000 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 376.85 290.53 261.35 CHECK TOTAL 756.00 CHECK TOTAL 2.260.00 9.860.00 9,000.00 CHECK TOTAL 46.46 35.56 71.56 80.74 45.24 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 376.85 290.53 261.35 928.73 46.46 35.56 71.56 80.74 45.24 105 21,120.00 2.260.00 9.860.00 9,000.00 756.00 756.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041208 79757 201286 PARTS 20041202 79758 201286 PARTS 20041202 79636 201286 PARTS 20041208 79767 201286 PARTS 20041202 79665 201286 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 001-122240-652995-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303734 590208 VENDOR 900140 - JANE & SHANNON HAGENBUCH 00-1216 MEALS-HAGENBUCH 681-421190-634405-00000 HAGENBUCH MEALS 00-1216 R KIPP 16J CHECK NO 20042141 590101 VENDOR 361120 - JASPER SEATING CO.. INC. 187356 001-122240-651930-00000 206567 TABLE/CHAIRS AMT NET VCHR DISC 59.70 0.00 CHECK NO 590115 VENDOR 362470 - JEFFERY GREEN 20041752 T BALL 8/20-9/17 159547 T BALL 111-156390-634999-00000 CHECK NO 20041333 20041333 589526 VENDOR 9920 - JEFFREY MCCARTNEY. M.D. P.A. L BP, ADBURY 8/8/02 160120 L BRADBURY 8/8/02 001-155930-631210-00000 R OUELLET 8/12/02 160120 R OUELLET 8/12/02 001-155930-631210-00000 VCHR NET 59.70 70.16 0.00 70.16 CHECK NO 589687 VENDOR 169770 - JENNINGS ARCHITECTURAL HARDWARE 979.90 0.00 979.90 35.94 0.00 35.94 106.66 0.00 106.66 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,531.92 0.00 210.00 0.00 210.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 210.00 0.00 1,498.61 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.498.61 1,498.61 0.00 254.80 0.00 254.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 254.80 0.00 81.25 0.00 81.25 0.00 81.25 0.00 81.25 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 162.50 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042155 DESCRIPTION 14810 158199 SUPPLIES 20042155 14653 158199 SUPPLIES 20042155 14730 158199 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041210 589797 VENDOR 253330 - JILL DALTON 8/30. 9/6, 9/9 DANCING DALTON DANCING 8/30, 9/6. 9/9 111-156390-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303689 590184 VENDOR 900050 - JILL DENTON REFUND PARKS-DENTON DENTON-REFUND PARKS 111-156395-347990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042156 20041195 20041195 20042137 589896 83596 158289 STAPLES 83627 204454 8/4-9/3 83626 204454 9/4-10/2 84035 205792 8/9-9/8 VENDOR 292620 - JM TODD. INC. 001-122240-651210-00000 0,00 517-121640-634999-00000 0.00 517-121640-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-651210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041332 589659 VENDOR 157530 - JOHN A. CRIST, M.D. E PREYSS 7/16-8/22 001-155930-631210-00000 160121 E PREYSS 7/16-8/22 0.00 CHECK NO 589527 VENDOR 10160 - JOHN COLLINS AUTO PARTS, INC. AMT NET 349.60 533.58 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 162.50 CHECK TOTAL 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 73.30 19.55 273.00 274.45 CHECK TOTAL 787.80 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 349.60 533.58 75.00 958.18 60.00 73.30 19.55 273.00 274.45 640.30 787.80 787.80 107 60.00 162.50 162.50 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042160 799279 158260 MINI LAMP 20041200 798986 201738 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 408-233351-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041199 590045 02112706 203428 PARTS VENDOR 348490 - JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 152-162541-646311-00000 20041198 02335073 203427 PARTS/DISC 20041198 02335073 203427 PARTS/DISC 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 82,18 0,00 1 CHECK NO 589625 20041209 193640 206375 PARTS 20041201 193250 206375 SUPPLIES 20042159 194016 158275 3/4 HP 2SP D-DR 20041209 193669 206375 PARTS VENDOR 127280 - JOHNSTONE SUPPLY PAGE 108 VCHR NET 82.18 10.50 0.00 10.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 92.68 0.00 18.50 0.00 18.50 0.37- 0.00 CHECK NO 20041758 150-162545-646311-00000 0.00 0.37- CHECK NO 20041741 150-162545-646311-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 18.49 0.00 18.49 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 001-122240-652996-00000 590037 VENDOR 347350 - JUAN VARGAS LAWN MAINTENANCE AND 8/02 139-172531-634999-00000 202929 8/02 590141 VENDOR 363590 - JULIUS VITALE CLOSING 207225 CLOSING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 36.62 0.00 12.60 0.00 12.60 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 85.19 0.00 85.19 0.00 432.39 0.00 432.39 338-163650-761100-60018 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 830.18 0.00 750.00 0.00 750.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 750,00 0.00 2,998.29 0.00 2.998.29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,998.29 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK NO 589645 VENDOR 146900 - KARLA A. SEIBERT, M.D. 20041331 S NEWELL 6/11 160122 S NEWELL 6/11 001-155930-631210-00000 20041331 S NEWELL 6/17 160122 S NEWELL 6/17 001-155930-631210-00000 VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20041331 S NEWELL 1/24/02 160122 S NEWELL 1/24/02 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 35.75 0.00 35.75 20041331 S NEWELL 12/10/01 160122 S NEWELL 12/10/01 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 26.00 0.00 26.00 CHECK NO 590116 VENDOR 362530 - KATHY HARWICK 20042143 135 206948 SAILBOATS 111-156332-764990-00000 111-156332-764400-00000 0.00 35.75 0.00 35.75 CHECK NO 590138 VENDOR 363490 - I~TZ PLUMBING 20041668 6933 63548000008 NIETO 160061 191-138785-884200-33752 0.00 68.25 0.00 68.25 CHECK NO 589996 VENDOR 338030 - KCCS, INC. 20041407 #11 106605 7/15-8/11/02 313-163673-631400-60071 331-163650-631400-60071 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 165.75 CHECK NO 20041342 589762 VENDOR 221100 - KEEP COLLIER BEAUTIFUL, INC. 84 205684 REIMB 20041342 85 205684 REIMB 470-173410-634999-00000 470-173410-634999-00000 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3.000.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0,00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 180.00 0.00 48,759,70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 48.759.70 0.00 48,759.70 0.00 414.00 0.00 414.00 0.00 325.00 0.00 325.00 20041342 86 470-173410-634999-00000 0.00 262.50 0.00 262.50 205684 REIMB SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041349 79 205684 RECYCLE PROG COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO /LMT DISC 470-173410-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041205 589900 VENDOR 294690 - KEISER CORPORATION 0142804 111-156313-646970-00000 157939 PARTS CHECK NO 303732 590185 VENDOR 900050 - KEITH SANDESON REFUND ADOPT- K SANDESON 001-155410-346410-00000 K SANDESON REFUND ADOPT ~ NET VCHR DISC 3,935.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042317 20042317 20042317 20042317 20042317 20042317 20042317 20042317 20042317 20042317 590050 18060 203733 6/5-23/02 18079 203733 6/02 18063 203733 6/3-21/02 18080 203733 6/3/02 18061 203733 6/4-21/02 18077 203733 6/02 18062 203733 6/5-23/02 18115 203733 6/9/02 18072 203733 6/02 18073 203733 6/02 VENDOR 349070 - KELLEY SWOFFORD ROY, INC. 194-101540-634999-10524 194-101540-634999-10524 194-101540-634999-10524 194-101540-634999-10524 194-101540-634999-10524 194-101540-634999-10524 194-101540-634999-10524 194-101540-634999-10524 194-101540-634999-10524 194-101540-634999-10524 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 3,935.00 4,936.50 0.00 631.29 0.00 631.29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 631.29 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 12,000.00 0.00 1,220.00 0.00 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,000.00 1,220.00 4,500.00 0.00 11.50 0.00 11.50 7,539.06 0.00 1,880.00 0.00 12,090.00 0.00 5,483.50 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 1,687.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,539.06 1,880.00 12,090.00 5,483.50 9,000.00 1.687.20 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042317 18064 203733 6/5-23/02 20042317 18117 203733 6/23/02 20042317 18066 203733 7/1/02 20042317 18076 203733 6/11-17/02 20042317 18075 203733 6/02 20042317 18116 203733 6/16/02 20042317 18074 203733 6-8/02 NEWSP. 20042317 18071 203733 6/02 20042317 18067 203733 6/17/02 & 6/24/02 20042317 18070 203733 6/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 194-101540-634999-10524 0.00 194-101540-634999-10524 0.00 194-101540-634999-10524 0.00 194-101540-634999-10524 0.00 194-101540-634999-10524 0.00 194-101540-634999-10524 0.00 194-101540-634999-10524 0.00 194-101540-634999-10524 0.00 194-101540-634999-10524 0.00 194-101540-634999-10524 0.00 CHECK NO 20041381 589704 VENDOR 179190 - KENNETH R. DEVOS,MAI, SP~q CL-02-05 334-163650-631600-60134 106010 SVS 0.00 CHECK NO 303730 303730 590186 VENDOR 900050 - KETCH CAY REC 1169117 ERICKSEN/KETC KETCH CAY/GROVER ELEC REF REC 1326791 ERICKSEN/KETC KETCH CAY/GROVER ELEC REF 670-000000-220113-00000 670-000000-220113-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589730 VENDOR 194110 - KILPATRICK TURF EQUIPMENT ~JqT NET 12,150.00 6,355.38 38,356.00 746.99 307.50 5,234.00 6,000.00 1,260.00 2,134.00 791.00 CHECK TOTAL 3.260.42 CHECK TOTAL 6,785.60 11,672.70 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 12,150.00 6,355.38 38,356.00 746.99 307.50 5,234.00 6,000.00 1,260.00 2,134.00 791.00 128,746.13 3,260.42 3,260.42 6,785.60 11,672.70 18,458.30 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041759 3983900 202174 PARTS 20041759 4035700 202174 PARTS 20041759 4006700 202174 PARTS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589918 VENDOR 305300 - KONE, INC 20041760 15721056 202198 8/02 20041189 15721055 200424 8/02 20041319 15721054 201280 MAINT 8/02 408-233312-634999-00000 0.00 408-253221-634999-00000 0.00 001-122240-646285-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 590187 VENDOR 900050 - KRISTIN WOLFF 303748 REFUND PARKS-WOLFF REFUND PARKS-WOLFF 111-156390-347990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589683 20041387 P85081044 200869 PARTS 20041383 P-854600-44 160193 PARTS VENDOR 167650 - L.B. SMITH INC. 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041322 589740 VENDOR 201990 - LANGHAM CONSULTING SERVICES 2002133 301-121125-634999-01017 206788 CONSULTING SERVICES 0.00 CHECK NO 590053 VENDOR 349920 - LAW ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL AMT NET 45.04 60.82 5.04 CHECK TOTAL 106.00 106.00 2,941.96 CHECK TOTAL 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 79.45 275.13 8.04 CHECK TOTAL 2.176.28 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 ~PAGE VCHR NET 45.04 60.82 5.04 110.90 3,153.96 100.00 100.00 79.45 283.17 362.62 2.176.28 2,176.28 2,941.96 106.00 106.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042223 4033576506 206715 ENG SVS 20041377 4033576509 206805 ASBESTO SURVEY 20041754 4033576510 160015 SAMPLE ANALYSIS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 306-116360-631400-00163 0.00 301-120435-762200-52001 0.00 301-120435-762200-52001 0.00 CHECK NO 20041237 589632 VENDOR 135200 - LAWN EQUIPMENT CENTER 51256 200406 Pb~NTS 20041239 51566 200095 EQUIP PARTS 20041238 21519 200406 REPAIR EQUIP 109-182901-652990-00000 109-182901-652990-00000 20041240 21518 200406 REPAIR EQUIP 109-182901-652990-00000 109-182901-634999-00000 109-182901-634999-00000 AMI' NET VCHR DISC 700.00 0.00 1t PAGE 113 CHECK NO 20041348 589853 VENDOR 274230 - LAZENBY & ASSOCIATES 11135 408-253211-652310-00000 203399 CORROSION INHIBITOR VCHR NET 700.00 CHECK NO 20042162 20041325 20042162 20042162 20042162 589529 20195-154729 8/28 20195-154729 8/28 20195-154713 9/4 20195-154713 9/4 201785 20195-99362 8/2-9/3 20195-99362 8/2-9/3 20195-99365 8/2-9/3 20195-99365 8/2-9/3 20195-110589 8/8-9/9 20195-110589 8/8-9/9 VENDOR 11110 - LEE CO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 188-140480-643100-00000 495-192350-643100-00000 101-163620-643100-00000 470-173435-643100-00000 470-173442-643100-00000 800.00 0.00 800.00 160.00 0.00 160.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.660.00 0.00 806.21 0.00 806.21 0.00 2.88 0.00 0.00 133.60 0.00 45.00 0.00 2.88 178.60 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 997.69 4,038.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.457.85 0.00 4,038.50 4.038.50 1.457.85 0.00 146.55 0.00 146.55 0.00 76.32 0.00 76.32 0.00 447.23 0.00 447.23 0.00 348.23 0.00 348.23 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042162 20042162 20042162 20042162 DESCRIPTION 20195-154799 9/11 20195-154799 9/11 20195-145917 8/2-9/3 20195-145917 8/2-9/3 20195-100816 9/10 20195-100816 9/10 20195-101440 8/12-9/11 20195-101440 8/12-9/11 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-061010-643100-00000 0.00 001-155410-643100-00000 0.00 001-061010-643100-00000 0.00 198-157440-643100-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041991 20041991 20041991 589967 VENDOR 327030 - LEE COUNTY OVERALL EXT. ADVISORY REGIST-A.SULECKI, 9/23 159778 - REGIST-A.SULECKI REGIST-S.BROWN, 9/23 159778 - REGIST-S.BROWN REGIST-S.MASON, 9/23 159778 - REGIST-S.M/LSON 111-138911-654360-00000 0.00 111-138911-654360-00000 0.00 111-138911-654360-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041385 20041385 589874 VENDOR 281070 - LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE CO. 608836 001-155410-652110-00000 160182 SAFETY SHOE 609950 001-155410-652110-00000 160182 SAFETY SHOE 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041203 589905 VENDOR 296750 - LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE CO. 616404 408-233352-652140-00000 200602 SAFETY SHOES 0.00 CHECK NO 20041196 589735 VENDOR 200110 - LEIBOWITZ AND ASSOCIATES 2400-01M#4 111-100210-631990-00000 159979 RESEARCH CABLE TV REG ISSUES 0.00 AMT NET 1,180.42 24.95 8.12 52.74 CHECK TOTAL 15.00 15.00 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 146.00 146.00 CHECK TOTAL 101.16 CHECK TOTAL 100.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1PA114 VCHR NET 1,180.42 24.95 8.12 52.74 3,742.41 15.00 15.00 15.00 45.00 146.00 146.00 292.00 101.16 101.16 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20041379 20041378 20041380 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET 113-000000-115420-00000 113-000000-115420-00000 113-000000-115420-00000 DESCRIPTION 589893 VENDOR 290080 - LENNAR HOMES, INC REF 356168 LENNAR FAMILY LENNAR FAMILY REF 356168 REF 356340 LENNAR HOMES REF 356340 LENNAR HOMES REF 356328 LENNAR HOMES REF 356328 LENNAR HOMES 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303733 590188 VENDOR 900050 - LENNAR HOMES, INC REF 353936 LENNAR HOMES 113-138900-322490-00000 LENNAR HOMES REF 353936 0.00 CHECK NO 20041212 20041748 20041213 20041229 20041229 20041355 20041352 589530 VENDOR 9003 200235 SOD 8845 206602 SPD 8944 201993 SOD 8925 200879 SOD 8912 200879 SOD 8904 206370 SOD 8920 206370 SOD 11240 - LEO'S SOD & LANDSCAPING 408-253212-646314-00000 001-156363-646314-00000 408-253212-646314-00000 111-163645-646314-00000 111-163645-646314-00000 322-183825-646320-00000 322-183825-646320-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041747 589578 VENDOR 105260 - LESCO SERVICE CENTER 2B2VG4 111-156332-646320-00000 206807 RYEGRASS SEED 0.00 17.00 2,12 0.90 CHECK TOTAL 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 45.00 3,296.00 79.80 159.60 159.60 5,151.60 2,098.80 CHECK TOTAL 9,760. O0 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 17.00 2.12 0.90 20.02 75. O0 75.00 45.00 3,296.00 79.80 159.60 159.60 5,151.60 2.098.80 10,990.40 9,760.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042158 2B2X79 159934 SUPPLIES 20041749 2B2VG2 206808 RYEGRASS SEED COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182901-652990-00000 0.00 111-156334-646320-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 590021 VENDOR 344170 - LESCO, INC. 20041347 2B2V73 203648 ll~qCKER DYE 111-156332-652310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041218 590072 VENDOR 356230 - LEXISNEXIS MATTHEW BENDER 4792103X/2099450001 307-156110-766100-00000 160052 FL CONDO LAW #10 0.00 CHECK NO 590018 VENDOR 343480 - LILIANA CARRENDER 20041354 9/3/02 6 HRS LARRENDER 9/3/02 6 HRS 681-431590-634402-00000 20041354 9/4/02 3.5 HRS LARRENDER 9/4/02 3.5 HRS 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589531 VENDOR 11330 - LINDA DENNING 20042297 8/20-9/1 TRVL L.DENNING 8/20-9/1 TRVL L.DENNING 001-157110-640200-00000 001-157110-640300-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589875 VENDOR 281470 - LISA ANN 20041341 YOGA 8/20-27/02 200988 YOGA 8/20-27/02 111-156313-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041761 589818 VENDOR 258940 - LITTLE CEASARS 9/6/02 PIZZA 111-156390-652210-00000 202003 9/6/02 PIZZA 0.00 A~fl' NET 110.35 4,880.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,075.00 CHECK TOTAL 65.15 CHECK TOTAL 96.00 56.00 CHECK TOTAL 19.72 325.36 CHECK TOTAL 61.11 CHECK TOTAL 18.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1PA~ 116 VCHR NET 110.35 4,880.00 14,750.35 1,075.00 1,075.00 65.15 65.15 96.00 56.00 152.00 345.08 345.08 61.11 61.11 18. O0 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20042136 589948 VENDOR 321620 - LONG BAY PARTNERS, LLC LIVINGSTON ROAD NORTH 411-273511-763100-70049 413-263611-763100-73002 204222 LIVINGSTON ROAD NORTH 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303749 303749 590189 VENDOR 900050 - LUCY ORTIZ REFUND PARKS-ORTIZ REFUND PARKS-ORTIZ REFUND PARKS-ORTIZ REFUND PARKS-ORTIZ 111-000000-208901-00000 111-156343-347911-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042089 589980 VENDOR 332820 - LYNN CLARKE 8/26-29 TRVL L.CLARKE 8/26-29 TRVL L.CLARKE 111-156425-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041382 20042144 589643 VENDOR 141870 - M. JEAN RAWSON 29466B 681-421190-631020-00000 M JAMES 98-1079 29690 111-138911-631100-00000 203229 7/25 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041343 20041224 20041224 589801 785 160139 SVS 702 200049 FOREIGN MAIL 702 200048 1ST CLASS MAIL VENDOR 254880 - MAIL BARCODING SERVICES OF 001-000000-141400-00000 001-000000-141400-00000 001-000000-141400-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 459,710.13 424,115.07 CHECK TOTAL 5.40 90.00 CHECK TOTAL 69.00 CHECK TOTAL 100.00 1,000.00 CHECK TOTAL 7.52 298.13 965.69 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,~AGE ~ 117 VCHR NET 18.00 883,825.20 883,825.20 5.40 90.00 95.40 69.00 69.00 100.00 1,000.00 1,100.00 7.52 298.13 965.69 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,271.34 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 I~,GE VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO CHECKNO 589871 VENDOR 280100 - MAIL STATION COURIER A~FF DISC ~uMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20041226 19581 200945 8/16-31/02 408-233351-649990-00000 408-233352-649990-00000 408-233312-649990-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 103.33 103.33 103.34 0.00 310. O0 20041227 19503 201914 8/1-15/02 408-210151-634999-00000 0.00 242.00 0.00 242.00 20041225 19582 201907 8/16-31/02 113-138312-641950-00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 20041340 19583 201914 SVS 8/16-31/02 408-210151-634999-00000 0.00 242.00 0.00 242.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 829.00 CHECK NO 590190 VENDOR 900050 - MAJESTIC SPRINKLER & LANDSCAPING 303731 REF 348152 MAJESTIC SPRKL MAJESTIC SPRINKLER REF 348152 113-138900-322110-00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 CHECK NO 590010 VENDOR 340980 - MALCOLM PIRNIE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.00 20042208 100013738/13739 106856 7/6-8/9/02 413-263611-631400-73949 414-263611-631400-73949 0.00 0.00 26,122.18 2,240.66 0.00 28,362.84 CHECK NO 590047 VENDOR 348800 - MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 28,362.84 20042298 REC~I~333561 L.COMBS 207257 - REGIST-COMBS F/2 CLASSES 121-138755-654360-34500 0.00 1,150. O0 0.00 1,150.00 CHECK NO 589572 VENDOR 100800 - MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,150.00 20041222 30069633 200076 TEMPS 001-126334-646311-00000 0.00 650.00 0.00 650.00 CHECK NO 589886 VENDOR 285890 - MANPOWER TEMPOP, ARY SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 650.00 20041336 30056461 408-210151-634999-00000 0.00 463.68 0.00 463.68 201189 TEMPS SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041753 589532 VENDOR 234039 200871 TOOLS 11590 - MARCO ACE HARDWARE 001-156363-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041404 20041399 20041392 20041403 20041398 20041767 20041396 20041393 20041376 20041395 20042282 20041395 20041376 589624 208260597 200292 SUPPLIES 208280665 200527 SUPPLIES 110080586 203634 SUPPLIES 208280769 200014 SUPPLIES 208160661 200636 SUPPLIES 110150545 201608 SUPPLIES 209050752 201317 SUPPLIES 208160596 201575 SUPPLIES 208260518 201251 SUPPLIES 208280667 201332 SUPPLIES 208260696 200331 SUPPLIES 208230646 201332 SUPPLIES 208210642 201251 SUPPLIES VENDOR 127090 - MARCO OFFICE SUPPLY 146-144380-651110-00000 0.00 001-121710-651110-00000 0.00 001-138710-651110-00000 0.00 001-155110-651110-00000 0.00 001-000000-142500-00000 0.00 001-157110-652990-00000 0.00 681-421510-651110-00000 0.00 001-121810-651110-00000 0.00 001-122240-651110-00000 0.00 681-431310-651110-00000 0.00 111-178980-651110-00000 0.00 681-431310-651110-00000 0.00 001-122240-651110-00000 0.00 16J PAGE 119 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 VCHR NET 463.68 2.97 0.00 2.97 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.97 62,30- 0.00 62,30- 57.30 0.00 57.30 37,08 0.00 37.08 191,92 0.00 191.92 220.58 0.00 220.58 305.89 0.00 305.89 249.30 0.00 249.30 126.67 0.00 126.67 191.32 0.00 191.32 201.60- 0.00 201.60- 61,59 0.00 61.59 25.13 0.00 25.13 171.84 0.00 171.84 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041763 DESCRIPTION 208120545 200276 SUPPLIES 20041400 204080539 200511 SUPPLIES 20041389 208260702 204999 SUPPLIES 20041764 208150608 200336 SUPPLIES 20041393 110190633 201575 SUPPLIES 20041395 208160644 201332 SUPPLIES 20041388 110240549 203378 SUPPLIES 20041396 209050751 201317 SUPPLIES 20041767 208260522 201608 SUPPLIES 20042282 111050601 200331 SUPPLIES 20041390 208210520 203636 SUPPLIES 20041404 208050508 200292 SUPPLIES 20041398 208300502 200636 SUPPLIES 20041393 208160595 201575 SUPPLIES 20041401 207300547 200311 SUPPLIES 20041765 209040542 200636 PAPER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 113-138930-651110-00000 0.00 101-163610-651110~00000 0.00 111-156343-651110-00000 0.00 473-173413-651110-00000 0.00 001-121810-651110-00000 0.00 681-431310-651110-00000 0.00 101-163612-651110-00000 0.00 681-421510-651110-00000 0.00 001-157110-652990-00000 0.00 111-178980-651110-00000 0.00 001-155910-651110-00000 0.00 146-144380-651110-00000 0.00 001-000000-142500-00000 0.00 001-121810-651110-00000 0,00 490-144618-651110-00000 0.00 001-000000-142500-00000 0.00 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 150.82 O. O0 8.20 O. O0 PAGE 120 VCHR NET 150,82 8.20 800.80 0.00 800.80 43.15 0.00 43.15 3,53 O. O0 3.53 858.92 0.00 858.92 8.12 0.00 8.12 79.72 0.00 79.72 281.59 0.00 281.59 20.40 0.00 20.40 60.19 0.00 60.19 116.15 0.00 116.15 68.97 0.00 68.97 186.53 0.00 186.53 307.29 0.00 307.29 95.96 0.00 95.96 20041397 208230527 001-156110-651110-00000 0.00 950.68 0.00 950.68 200947 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041376 208230526 201251 SUPPLIES 20041395 207260614 201332 SUPPLIES 20041394 208230647 201337 SUPPLIES 20041376 110310568 201251 SUPPLIES 20041376 208280589 201251 SUPPLIES 20041376 209030539 201251 SUPPLIES 20041763 208260568 200276 SUPPLIES 20041394 208230650 201337 SUPPLIES 20041404 208190596 200292 SUPPLIES 20041399 208300539 200527 SUPPLIES 20041402 208300544 159775 DRAWER LEGAL 20041766 208200578 200860 SUPPLIES 20041397 201280642 200947 SUPPLIES 20041396 207260617 201317 SUPPLIES 20041767 208270555 201608 SUPPLIES 20041396 208280787 201317 SUPPLIES 20041768 208290646 204567 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-651110-00000 0.00 681-431310-651110-00000 0.00 681-410510-651110-00000 0.00 001-122240-651110-00000 0.00 001-122240-651110-00000 0.00 001-122240-651110-00000 0.00 113-138930-651110-00000 0.00 681-410510-651110-00000 0.00 146-144380-651110-00000 0.00 001-121710-651110-00000 0.00 111-163647-651110-00000 0.00 408-210151-651110-00000 0.00 001-156110-651110-00000 0.00 681-421510-651110-00000 0.00 001-157110-652990-00000 0.00 681-421510-651110-00000 0.00 408-233352-651110-00000 0.00 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 820.00 0.00 PAGE 121 VCHR NET 820.00 88.14 0.00 88.14 13.80 0.00 13.80 7.11 0.00 851.83- 0.00 7.11 851.83- 46.02 0.00 46.02 274.08 0.00 274.08 2.51 0.00 2.51 65.60 0.00 65.60 47.98 0.00 47.98 62.45 0.00 62.45 239.90 0.00 239.90 939.70- 0.00 939.70- 14.52 0.00 14.52 20.01 0.00 20.01 81.21 0.00 81.21 156.56 0.00 156.56 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041404 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111140027 200292 SUPPLIES 20041393 208220581 201575 SUPPLIES 20041391 208190674 203510 SUPPLIES 146-144380-651110-00000 0.00 001-121810-651110-00000 0.00 111-156310-651110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589616 20041353 8/30/02 3 HRS DELASHMET 8/30/02 3 HRS 20041353 9/03/02 8.5 HRS DELASHMET 9/03/02 8.5 HRS VENDOR 122850 - MARIA G. DELASHMET 681-421190-634402-00000 20041750 02-7018 P MUNZO DELASHMET 02-7018 P MUNZO 20042226 01-2936 P ACEVEDO DELASHMET 01-2936 P ACEVEDO 20042226 02-4977 A CALLEJAS DELASHMET 02-4977 A CALLEJAS 20042226 01-2466 J DIMAS DELASHMET 01-2466 J DIMAS 20041750 02-1712 V QUIEJ DELASHMET 02-1712 V QUIEJ 20041750 01-2439 J BENITEZ DELASHMET 01-2439 J BENITEZ 9/04/02 4.5 HRS DELASHMET 9/04/02 4.5 HRS 02-1524 R RODRIGUEZ DELASHMET 02-1524 A RODRIGUEZ 02-1505 J GAMEZ DELASHMET 02-1505 J GAMEZ 02-1529 C PAREDES DELASHMET 02-1529 C PARADES 20041353 20041750 20041750 20041750 AMT NET VCHR DISC 4.09 0.00 1 PAGE 122 VCHR NET 4.09 143.94 0.00 143.94 379.72 0.00 379.72 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6. 091.85 0.00 48.00 0.00 48.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 136.00 0.00 136.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 40.00 32.00 0.00 72.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 16J 1 PAGE VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20041750 02-0108 A MANZANILLA DELASHMET 02-0108 A MANZANILLA 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 20042226 97-393 H GARCIA DEU~SHMET 97-393 H GARCIA 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 20041750 98-0562 A BONORA DELASHMET 98-0562 A BONOP~A 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 20041750 02-1703 E SANCHEZ DELASHMET 02-1703 E SANCHEZ 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 16.00 0,00 16.00 20041750 02-1846 S LHOMMEUS DELASHMET 02-1846 S LHOMMEUS 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 CHECK NO 590161 VENDOR 900030 - MARILYN MCICAY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 512.00 303736 8/28 TRVL MARILYN MCICAY 8/28 TRVL MARILYN MCKAY 001-156180-640300-00000 0.00 10.44 0.00 10.44 CHECK NO 589722 VENDOR 188200 - MARRIOTT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.44 20042090 C0NF#86924386 R.ABREUiO/7 313-163611-640300-00000 159437 - CONFi~q)6924386 R,ABREAU 10/7 0.00 196.00 0.00 196.00 CHECK NO 589533 VENDOR 12080 - MARTIN'S UNIFORM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 196.00 20041188 91302390 001-155410-652110-00000 0.00 001-155410-641950-00000 0.00 160039 SHIRTS 591.75 5.55 0.00 597.30 CHECK NO 589782 VENDOR 238850 - MBC FASTENERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 597.30 20041223 7692 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 201696 PARTS 442.80 0.00 442.80 CHECK NO 589539 VENDOR 12200 - MCCONNELLS TRUE VALUE HARDWARE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 442.80 20041215 171619 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 40.47 0.00 40.47 205920 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041219 171888 206075 20041386 171999 205920 20041221 171692 206134 20041221 171680 206134 20041215 171632 205920 20041220 171720 206076 20041386 171941 205920 20041221 171945 206134 20041221 171860 206134 20042147 172028 206134 20042147 172074 206134 20041215 171723 205920 20041386 172000 205920 20041214 171724 200948 20041221 171895 206134 20041221 171691 206134 20041384 171876 160195 DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-210130-652910-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 101-163620-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET VCHR DISC 25.15 0.00 0.67 0.00 6.36 0.00 7.45 0.00 1.79- 0.00 9.06 0.00 VCHR NET 25.15 0.67 6.36 7.45 1.79- 9.06 12.85 0.00 12,85 17.52 0.00 17.52 68.81 0.00 68.81 11.11 0,00 11.11 1,75 0.00 1.75 13.50 0.00 13.50 2.51 0.00 2.51 46.90 0.00 46.90 7.09 O.OO 1.61- 0.00 7.09 1.61- 19.25 0.00 19.25 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041221 171991 206134 20041217 171886 206074 20041221 171774 206134 20041337 172022 206076 20041762 171998 206143 20042147 171975 206134 20041221 171903 206134 20041214 171707 200948 20041215 171406 205920 20041220 171731 206076 20041215 171736 205920 20041221 171925 206134 20042224 172080 206274 20041214 171833 200948 20041386 171900 205920 20041386 171916 205920 20041221 171762 206134 DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 408-233350-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 101-163620-652990-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 101-163620-652990-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 AMT NET 48.30 40.09 2.42 43.22 34.66 2.38 14.92 17.41 6.27 15.08 6.29 1.96 112.13 3.48 6.56 6.56 8.53 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 48.30 40.09 2.42 43.22 34.66 2.38 14,92 17.41 6.27 15.08 6.29 1.96 112.13 3.48 6.56 6,56 8.53 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041216 171426 206073 20041221 171653 206134 20041216 171850 206073 20041221 171949 206134 20041338 171980 206075 20041327 172087 160143 20041337 171984 206076 20041762 171797 206143 20041216 171884 206073 20041221 171989 206134 20041221 171652 206134 20041215 171528 205920 20042147 171973 206134 20041215 171713 205920 20041220 171906 206076 20041221 171272 206134 DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-233352-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 408-233352-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 408-210130-652910-00000 0.00 495-192370-652990-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 111-156332-652990-00000 0.00 408-233352-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 001-122240-652987-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 AMT NET 40.39 7.90 27.56 2.48 51.79 28.57 2.20 22.83 12.01 44.99 9.25 2.13 7.44 23.44 121.71 8.37 16J VCHR DISC 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 40.39 7.90 27.56 2.48 51.79 28.57 2.20 22.83 12.01 44.99 9,25 2.13 23.44 121.71 8.37 20041214 171832 101-163620-652990-00000 0.00 26.67 0.00 26.67 200948 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041221 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 171697 206134 SUPPLIES 20041221 171725 206134 SUPPLIES 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589534 20041230 202383.180 8/02 202383 8/02 20041234 200445.176 8/02 200445 8/02 20041233 200537.181 8/02 200537 8/02 20041235 200444.174 8/02 200444 8/02 20041231 202379.179 8/02 202379 8/02 20041351 202376.175 8/02 202376 8/02 20041233 200537.182 8/02 200537 8/02 20041350 202375.178 8/02 202375 8/02 20041232 202369.177 8/02 202369 8/02 VENDOR 12140 - MCGEE AND ASSOCIATES 111-163646-631403-00000 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 2.69 0.00 1.47 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 PAGE 127 VCHR NET 2.69 1.47 1,101.20 CHECK NO 20041324 0.00 777.50 0.00 777.50 111-163646-631403-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042149 136-162590-631403-00000 0.00 152-162541-631403-00000 0.00 111-163646-631403-00000 0.00 111-163646-631403-00000 0.00 111-163646-631403-00000 0.00 540.00 0.00 540.00 71.00 0.00 71.00 530.00 0.00 530.00 332.50 0.00 332.50 230.00 0.00 230.00 629.50 0.00 629.50 377.50 0.00 377.50 540.00 0.00 540.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,566.23 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 111-163646-631403-00000 0.00 111-163646-631403-00000 0.00 0.00 590078 VENDOR 357710 - MCLAUGHLIN TOURISM MANAGEMENT #3 194-101540-634999-00000 205790 PROF SVS 4,028.00 589577 VENDOR 104940 - MCM ELECTRONICS 786998 001-121143-651950-00000 159779 TAPE ERASER 2,566.23 2.566.23 0.00 50.99 0.00 50.99 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041228 20041228 20041228 20041228 20041228 20041228 20041228 20041228 20041228 20041228 20041228 589968 20536 200117 UNIFORMS 20539 200117 UNIFORMS 20533 200117 UNIFORMS 20540 200117 UNIFORMS 20537 200117 UNIFORMS 20538 200117 UNIFORMS 20530 200117 UNIFORMS 20535 200117 UNIFORMS 20534 200117 UNIFORMS 20532 200117 UNIFORMS 20531 200117 UNIFORMS VENDOR 327370 - MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STORE 490-144610-652110-00000 16J AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 1 PAGE 128 VCHR NET 50.99 0.00 47.50 0.00 47.50 490-144610-652110-00000 0.00 490-144610-652110-00000 0.00 490-144610-652110-00000 0.00 490-144610-652110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303746 490-144610-652110-00000 0.00 29.16 0.00 29.16 CHECK NO 20042154 490-144610-652110-00000 0.00 490-144610-652110-00000 0.00 70.15 0.00 70.15 490-144610-652110-00000 0.00 490-144610-652110-00000 0.00 490-144610-652110-00000 0.00 93.90 0.00 93.90 58.32 0.00 58.32 58.32 0.00 58.32 80.20 0.00 80.20 8.95 0.00 8.95 0.00 8.95 8.95 0.00 427.32 0.00 427.32 0.00 35.96 0.00 35.96 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 746.19 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 35.96 VENDOR 236840 - MEYER LAMINATES, INC. 001-122240-652989-00000 5X12 FIGURED MAHOGANY 589778 255891 158258 590162 VENDOR 900030 - MELISSA HENNING 8/25-9/2 TRVL M.HENNING 001-178985-640200-00000 8/25-9/2 TRVL MELISSA HENNING 173.09 0.00 173.09 117.65 0.00 117.65 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041330 590130 VENDOR 363260 - MICHAEL D. MCPHEE. MD. PA J DYSERT 6/25, 7/2 001-155930-631210-00000 160123 J DYSERT 6/25. 7/2 16J CHECK NO 303720 303721 590163 VENDOR 900030 - MICHAEL LEVY 8/7-8/21 TRVL MIKE LEVY 8/7-8/21 TRVL MIKE LEVY 8/7-8/21 TRVL MIKE LEVY 8/7-8/21TRVL MIKE LEVY 001-138710-640300-00000 001-138710-640200-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 CHECK NO 20041328 589761 VENDOR 220520 - MICHAEL S. FLYNN, M,D. Y ZAPATA 6/26/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160124 Y ZAPATA 6/26/02 PAGE 129 CHECK NO 20041751 589950 VENDOR 323000 - MICHELLE DORALUS 01-0724 A MAISONEUVE 681-421190-634402-00000 DORALUS 0100724 A MAISONEUVE VCHR NET 427.32 CHECK NO 20041323 20041323 20041746 20041746 20041323 589540 30290001 205756 SIGNAL REPAIRS 30300001 205756 SIGNAL REPAIRS 30140002 206012 SVS 30160002 206012 SVS 30260001 205756 SIGNAL REPAIRS VENDOR 12420 - MID CONTINENT ELECTRIC 101-163630-646510-00000 101-163630-646510-00000 313-163673-763100-60172 313-163673-763100-60172 101-163630-646510-00000 0.00 438.75 0.00 438.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 438.75 0.00 21.95 0.00 21.95 0.00 12.76 0.00 12.76 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 34.71 0.00 26.00 0.00 26.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 26.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16.00 2,516.00 0.00 3,421.79 0.00 33,143.10 0.00 28,356.50 0.00 20,625.12 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,516.00 3,421.79 33,143.10 28,356.50 20,625.12 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041746 30150002 206012 SVS 20041323 30280001 205756 SIGNAL REPAIRS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 313-163673-763100-60172 0.00 101-163630-646510-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041206 589614 69374 159815 20041204 070059 207040 20041204 070108 207040 20041204 068300 207040 VENDOR 122160 - MIDWEST BLUEPRINT DIGITAL PRINT 368-116360-651210-00163 COPIES 355-156150-652210-33776 COPIES 355-156150-652210-33776 COPIES 355-156150-652210-33776 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 23,809.00 0.00 1 CHECK NO 20041321 589748 VENDOR 205860 - MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 502181 207111 MOVIES 20041321 505596 207111 20041321 502182 207111 20041321 505597 207111 129-156110-652670-33774 MOVIES 129-156110-652670-33774 MOVIES 129-156110-652670-33774 MOVIES 129-156110-652670-33774 PAGE 130 VCHR NET 23,809.00 700.00 0.00 700.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20041339 589582 VENDOR 106140 - MILLIPORE CORP. 3119961 114-178975-652910-00000 200813 FILTERS 112,571.51 CHECK NO 20041241 590076 VENDOR 357660 - MOBILE MINI STOFU~GE 47729906 109-182602-644600-00000 205733 RENT STOP~AGE UNIT 0.00 31.50 0.00 31.50 0.00 34.20 0.00 34.20 0.00 65.88 0.00 65.88 0.00 852.00 0.00 852.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 983.58 2,279.24 0.00 0.00 2.279.24 0.00 569.81 0.00 569.81 0.00 103.96 0.00 103.96 1.139.62 0.00 0.00 0;00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.554.17 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,139.62 4.092.63 1,554.17 1,554.17 0.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041344 589867 VENDOR 278600 DUES REIMB 159768 DUES REIMB MOHAN THAMPI 408-210155-654210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041207 590146 VENDOR 363640 23049 154949 PARTS MONTCAP FINANCIAL CORPORATION 111-156313-646970-00000 16J i CHECK NO 20041329 589920 VENDOR 305500 MORGAN MEDICAL CORP S BECKER 8/12/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160125 S BECKER 8/12/02 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20041320 590123 VENDOR 363090 MOVIE LICENSING USA 628766 355-156175-649010-80259 207107 COPYRIGHT LICENSE PAGE 131 CHECK NO 20042239 590070 VENDOR 355260 MS. SARA E. CATLETT CCG 1008 301-121125-634999-01017 205199 COMMUNICATION SVS FMS SVS VCHR NET 115.00 CHECK NO 20042318 589541 VENDOR 310037 207222 BOOKS 12960 MUNICIPAL CODE CORP 113-138312-654110-00000 267.00 0.00 267.00 CHECK NO 20042153 20042152 589542 VENDOR 078610 160147 SIGNS 078698 158262 SIGNS 13000 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & SIGN CO 001-122240-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 267.00 0.00 179.85 0.00 179.85 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 179.85 0.00 747.50 0.00 747.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 747.50 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,700.00 1,700. O0 0.00 720.13 0.00 720.13 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 720.13 1,600.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 0.00 267.46 0.00 267.46 0.00 826.80 0.00 826.80 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042152 078733 158262 SIGNS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041745 589953 VENDOR 323870 - MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING, INC. 92635 368-116360-652991-80604 205093 CABINET SYSTEM 0.00 CHECK NO 20041471 590023 VENDOR 344580 - NAACP 10/19 BANQUET-JIM COLETTA 160075 BANQUET- JIM COLE1-FA 001-010110-640310-01003 16J 1 CHECK NO 20041277 589543 VENDOR 13030 - NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY 02-050841 001-144510-652410-00000 206886 FLOWAGE FEES AMT NET VCHR DISC 713.30 0.00 CHECK NO 20041291 20041280 20041299 20041280 589544 VENDOR 67284 200799 PARTS 67283 202214 SUPPLIES 67296 200239 SUPPLIES 67279 202214 SUPPLIES 13080 - NAPLES ARMATURE WORKS 408-233351-655200-00000 408-253221-652990-00000 408-253212-655100-00000 408-253221-652990-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,716.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 132 CHECK NO 20042330 20042330 589545 VENDOR 13230 - NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL B.DRILICH 7/17/02 001-155930-634101-00000 207211 B.DRILICH 7/17/02 K.TRAYNOR 5/18/02 001-155930-634101-00000 207211 K.TRAYNOR 5/18/02 VCHR NET 713.30 1,807.56 9. 716. O0 9. 716. O0 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 1,730.75 O. O0 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,730.75 1,730.75 0.00 110.98 0.00 110.98 0.00 184.32 0.00 184.32 0.00 147.00 0.00 147.00 1,495.63 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1,495.63 1,937.93 0.00 312.97 0.00 312.97 0.00 724.59 0.00 724.59 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 PAGE 133 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042330 20042330 20042330 20042330 20042330 20042330 DESCRIPTION I.FRAGOSO 7/23/02 207211 I.FRAGOSO 7/23/02 B.DRILICH 7/24/02 207211 B.DRILICH 7/24/02 V.AGUILAR 7/13/02 207211 V.AGUILAR 7/13/02 A.HAMPSON 7/17/02 207211 A.HAMPSON 7/17/02 V.AGUILAR 7/10/02 207211 V.AGUILAR 7/10/02 G.TARVIN 7/1/02 207211 G.TARVIN 7/1/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 001-155930-634101-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041637 20041637 20041637 20041637 20041637 20041637 20041637 20041637 20041637 20041637 589827 VENDOR 259460 - NAPLES COURT REPORTING, INC. 8915 H. Pd~MIREZ 01-2724-CFA-LLM 8846 J.PUENTE 01-O01884-CF-LLM 8677-1 B.VICENTE 01-02574-CFA-LLM 8973 S.RUSSO 01-O02830-CF-LLM 8970 J.SPELL 01-O02693-CF-LLM 8886 D.LAYTON 02-577-CFA-LLM 9033 T.ROWLES 01-O02569-CF-FGB 8888 C.WOODS 01-O02882-CF-LLM 8807-1 T.ROWLES 01-2569-CFA-FGB 8959-1 L.TARVER$O2-1192-CFA-LLM 681-410310-633032-00000 681-410310-633032-00000 681-410310-633042-00000 681-410310-633032-00000 681-410310-633032-00000 681-410310-633032-00000 681-410310-633032-00000 681-410310-633032-00000 681-410310-633042-00000 681-410310-633042-00000 16J 1 AMI' NET VCHR DISC 724.59 0.00 VCHR NET 724.59 73.75 0.00 73.75 48.13 0.00 48.13 311.75 0.00 311.75 724.59 0.00 724.59 128.75 0.00 128.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,049.12 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 0.00 69.00 0.00 69.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 108.00 0.00 108.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041637 DESCRIPTION 8910 S.HOUSTON 01-2590-CFA-FGB 20041637 8967 L.HERREP~A 02-633-CFA-LLM 20041637 8895 T. FLICK 02-O00420-CF-LLM 20041637 8914 J.BELSINCE 02-O01065-CF-LLM 20041637 9025 G.PITMAN 01-O02635-CF-C-FGB 20041637 8824-1 K.PAULEY 01-002343-CF-FGB 20041637 8986 K.CORBY 01-003092-CF-FGB 20041637 888O C.MCCLAIN 01-O03061-CF-LLM/O03079 20041637 8681-1 J.BALLARD 01-1353-CF-LLM 20041637 8911 N.RIVERA 02-O00002-CF-LLM 20041637 9051 D.WILLIAMS 01-01940-CF-FGB 20041637 9048 F.SMIllq 01-O03029-CF-FGB 20041637 8688-1 B.SOLOMOND 01-2516-CFA-LLM 20042175 8960-1 T.FLICK 02-O00420-CF-LLM 20042175 8967-1 L. HERREP~A 02-633-CFA-LLM 20042175 8986-1 K.CORBY 01-3092-CFA-FGB COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 O.OO 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0,00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0,00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 AMT NET 30.00 45.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 66.00 30.00 60.00 99.00 30.OO 30.00 45.00 81.00 48.00 219.00 96.00 16J VCHR DISC 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 30.00 45.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 66.00 30.00 60.00 99.00 30.00 30.00 45.00 81.00 48.00 219.00 96.00 20042175 8847-1 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 C.CHARITE 02-O0508-CFA-FGB SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 16J 1 PAGE VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042175 8794-1 M.CONYERS 01-1319-CFA-FGB ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 AMT NET 180.00 VCHR DISC 0.00 VCHR NET 180.00 20042175 88O9 C.HOERSCH 02-714-CFA-FGB 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 30.00 69.00 0.00 99.00 20042175 8930-1 J.BALLARD 01-1353-CFA-LLM 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 39.00 0.00 39.00 20042175 8948-1 3.BALLARD 01-1353-CFA-LLM 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 117.00 0.00 117.00 20041637 8793-1 A.MAISONEUVE 01-724-CFA-LLM 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 93.00 0.00 93.00 20042175 8766-1 M.FAUCETTE 02-OOO649-CF-LLM 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 147.00 0.00 147. O0 20041637 8885 N.RIVERA 02-O00002-CFA-LLM 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 20041637 9004 A.WELLS 02-O00264-CF-LLM 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 20041637 9018-1 G.SMITH 02-O01221-CF-O-LLM 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 20041637 8892-1 3.PUENTE 01-1884-CFA-LLM 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 20041637 8808-1 J.ISAAC O0-O01590-CF-FGB 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 20041637 8971 J.MALESPINA 02-731-CFA-FGB 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 20041637 8889 J.GALES 02-O00705-CF-O-FGB 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 20042175 7270-2 C.CARTER 01-1985-CFA-FGB 681-410310-633052-00000 0.00 55.20 0.00 55.20 20042175 8971-1 J.MALESPINA 02-731-CF-LLM 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 138.00 0.00 138.00 20041637 8878 J.CANTU 01-O02264-CF-FGB 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 20041637 8820-1 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 36.00 W.DRAKE 01-351-CFA-FG8 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041637 DESCRIPTION 8821-1 K.PAULEY 01-2343-CFA-FGB 20041637 8959 L.TARVER 02-1192-CF-LLM 20041637 9044 C.WILLIAMS 02-3296-MMA-VM 20041637 8847 C.CHARITE 02-O00508-CF-O-FGB 20041637 8992 L.BLASUCCI 02-004715MM VM 20041637 8981 D.KLINE 00-O02674-CF-LLM 20041637 8599-1 V.MONTES 01-2821-CFA-LLM 20041637 8950 J.WASHINGTON 01-O03032-CF-LLM 20041637 8882 M.JOHNSON 01-O02258-CF-LLM 20041637 8894 J.CANTU 01-O02264-CFA-FGB 20041637 8912 T.GILLINGS 01-3000-CFA-FGB 20041637 8883 K.CORBY 01-OD3092-CF-FGB 20041637 9023 J.MENEDEZ 02-O00039-CF-FGB 20041637 8972 H.SANCHEZ 02-O00287-CF-LLM 20041637 9042 E.ELIASIN 01-476-CF-LLM 20041637 8907 D.CORTAZAL 02-O00884-CF-FGB 20041637 8960 T.FLICK 02-420-CF-LLM COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 AMT NET 27.00 30.00 30.00 60.00 30.00 45.00 120.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 60.00 30.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 27.00 136 30.00 30.00 60.00 30.00 45.00 120.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 60.00 30.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 PAGE 137 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041637 8686-1 R.ACOSTA 02-O0522-CF-LLM 20041637 8892 J.PUENTE 01-O01884-CF-O-LLM 20041637 8683-1 B.VICENTE 01-02574-CFA-FGB 20041637 9041 C.ALEXANDER 02-641-CJA-DRM 20041637 8427-2 D.RUFFIN 01-2713-CFA-LLM 20041637 8875 C.OLGIN 02-O00277-CF-LLM 20041637 8638-1 R.ACOSTA 01-O03118-CF-LLM 20041637 8538-1 R.PEREZ 01-2903-CFA-LLM 20041637 8881 ~.GALES 02-814-GFA-FGB 20041637 8987 A.MARTINEZ O0-O01685-CF-FGB 20041637 8991 R.MACNICOL 01-1602-CFA-FGB 20042175 8883-1 K.CORBY 01-3092-CFA-FGB 20042175 8811 ~.BALLARD 01-1353 CFA-LLM 20041637 8720A-1 C.DIAZ 02-000251-CFA-LLM 20041637 8660-2 T.HARVEY 01-195-CFA-LLM 20041637 9029 J.MENDEZ 02-O00039-CF-FGB COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633052-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 54.00 0.00 1 VCHR NET 54.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 306.00 0.00 306.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 48.00 0.00 48.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 96.00 0.00 96.00 44.00 0.00 44.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 45.00 201.00 5.00 0.00 251.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 132.00 0.00 132.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041637 DESCRIPTION 8984 B.VICENTE 01-O02574-CF-LLM 20041637 8871 J.SMITH 02-555-CJA-FGB 20041637 8896 C.TRAVIS 02-556-CJ-FGB 20041637 9020 J.DIMAS 01-O02466-CF-O-LLM 20042175 8968-1 L.HERRERA 02-602-CFA-LLM 20042175 8805-1 J.BALLARD 01-O01353-CFA-LLM 20042175 8894-1 J.CANTU 01-O0264-CF-FGB 20041637 8878-1 J.CANTU 01-2264-CFA-FGB 20041637 8913 D.TORRES 01-2254-CFA-LLM 20041637 8877 C.DOYLE 02-O00904-CF-LLM 20041637 9024 R.VEGA 01-O0289-CF-FGB 20041637 9054 C.GOMEZ 02-O00939-CF-FGB 20041637 8700-1 M.REED 01-2797-CFA-LLM 20041637 8968 L.HERRERA 02-602-CFA-LLM 20041637 8879 D.PONDS 01-O02928-CF-FGB 20041637 8906 J.CANTU 01-2264-CFA-FGB 20041637 T-2804 M.WILLIAMS O0-O00177-CF-LLM COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633022-00000 0.00 AMT NET 45.00 30.00 60.00 45.00 99.00 254.00 75.00 150.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 45.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 271.40 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 45.00 138 30.00 60.00 45.00 99.00 254.00 75.00 150.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 45.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 271.40 SEPTEHSER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041637 9018 L.SMITH 02-O01222-CF-O-LLM 20041637 8762-1 T.HARVEY 01-O00195-CF-LLM 20041637 8827-1 M.LOUIS 01-1081-CFA-LLM 20041637 8846-1 J.PUENTE 01-O01884-CF-O-LLM 20041637 9030 F.GARCIA 01-O01265-CF-FGB COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633042-00000 0.00 681-410310-633032-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041452 589603 VENDOR 115170 - NAPLES CUSTOM HITCH & TRAILER SALES 55823 206866 TRAILER 20041290 55367 200917 PARTS 20041290 55399 200917 PARTS 20041451 55823 206823 TRAILER 20041474 55935 160070 EMERSON TRAILER 001-172930-764990-00000 0.00 001-172930-764900-00000 O.O0 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 101-163620-764150-00000 0.00 101-163620-764150-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589546 VENDOR 13300 - NAPLES DAILY NEWS 20041472 2086270/002533 198-157430-648160-00000 159915 AD FOR MUSEUM EVENTS 20041461 2090209/029507 200413 LEGAL AD 200412842084330/053926 206661 ADS 200412832085051/057522 206393 ADS 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 30.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 30.00 111.00 0.00 111,00 129.00 0.00 129.00 69.00 0.00 69.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,357.40 0.00 0,00 2.57- 0.00 6,566.60 6,357.40 2.57- 126-138332-649100-35000 0.00 111-138317-649100-00000 0.00 495-192310-648160-00000 0.00 39.12 0.00 39.12 966.24 0.00 966.24 61.09 0.00 61.09 0,00 366.00 0.00 366.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 850.25 0.00 850.25 6,357.40 0.00 6,357.40 13,581.74 19.26 0.00 19.26 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041304 1040133 159434 SUBCRIPTION 12 WEEKS 20041303 45096 160046 SUBCRIP. VANDERBILT BEACH BRA 20041283 2084560/057522 206393 ADS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163609-654110-00000 0.00 307-156110-652650-00000 0.00 126-138332-649100-35000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041652 589547 VENDOR 13310 - RAPLES DAILY NEWS 2084970/051869 001-156145-634999-00000 160197 LEGAL AD 16J 1 CHECK NO 20042329 20042329 20042329 20042329 590060 V.TIPTON 8/13/02 207212 V.TIPTON 8/13/02 V.HALL 8/21/02 207212 V.HALL 8/21/02 D. ACOSTA 8/20/02 207212 D.ACOSTA 8/20/02 D. ACOSTA 8/1/02 207212 D.ACOSTA 8/1/02 VENDOR 352210 - NAPLES DAY SURGERY. LLC 001-155930-634101-00000 001-155930-634101-00000 001-155930-634101-00000 001-155930-634101-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 32.50 0.00 PAGE 140 VCHR NET 32.50 190.19 0.00 190.19 CHECK NO 20041639 20041639 20041639 20041639 20041639 589548 8/5 D.GHISLAINE 201863 8/5 D.GHISLAINE 8/15 D.MCKENNA 201863 8/15 D. MCKENNA 8/9 S.BAINTER 201863 8/9 S.BAINTER 8/13 Y. ZAPATA 201863 8/13 Y.ZAPATA 8/8 M. SOPENA 201863 8/8 M. SOPENA VENDOR 13340 - NAPLES DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 001-155930-631990-00000 65.80 0.00 65.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.720.94 0.00 966.24 0.00 966.24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 966.24 0.00 934.70 0.00 934.70 0.00 520.00 0.00 520.00 0.00 520.00 0.00 520.00 0.00 520.00 0.00 520.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,173.25 0.00 2.494.70 1.173.25 0.00 72.15 0.00 72.15 0.00 75.75 0.00 75.75 0.00 533.00 0.00 533.00 0.00 162.50 0.00 162.50 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041639 8/6 N.SMITH 201863 8/6 N.SMITH COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041470 589882 VENDOR 284680 - NAPLES ENDOSCOPY ASSOC. 8/2/02 O. ARIZABALETA 001-155930-631210-00000 160126 8/2/02 O. ARIZABALETA 0.00 CHECK NO 20041858 20041858 20041857 20041310 589549 18120 160198 SUPPLIES 18121 160198 SUPPLIES 18118 160184 RABBIT FOOD 17197 159865 FOOD VENDOR 13370 - NAPLES FEED & SEED, INC. 001-155410-652210-00000 001-155410-652210-00000 001-155410-652210-00000 001-155410-652210-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041638 20041638 20041638 20041638 20041638 20041638 20041638 589586 6/11 A. MCGEE 201872 6/11 A. MCGEE 8/12 V. TIPTON 201872 8/12 V. TIPTON 7/1 M. SANTOS 201872 7/1 M.SANTOS 8/15 S.NOWAJ(OWSKI 201872 8/15 S,NOWAKOWSKI 7/4 Y.ZAPATA 201872 Y.ZAPATA 8/6 8/13 G. TOWNSEND 201872 8/6 8/13 G.TOWNSEND 8/6 G. TOWNSEND 201872 8/6 G.TOWNSEND VENDOR 108550 - NAPLES MEDICAL CENTER 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 68.25 CHECK TOTAL 614.25 CHECK TOTAL 454.65 16.00 67.00 502.21 CHECK TOTAL 29.25 76.05 29.25 61.75 29.25 1,064.70 52.65 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 141 VCHR NET 68.25 2.084.90 614.25 614.25 454.65 16.00 67.00 502.21 1,039.86 29.25 76.05 29.25 61.75 29.25 1,064.70 52.65 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041455 20041455 20041455 20041455 20041455 20041455 20041455 589585 V. NITTOLO 7/12/02 203273 V.NITTOLO 7/12/02 V.NI1-FOLO 7/12/02 203273 V.NI1-FOLO 7/12/02 S. NOWAKOWSKI 7/22/02 203273 S.NOWAKOWSKI 7/22/02 V.NITTOLO 7/12/02 203273 V. NI1-FOLO 7/12/02 S.BAINTER 5/2/02 203273 S. BAINTER 5/2/02 V.AGUILAR 7/8,10 203273 V.AGUILAR 7/8,10 Y.ZAPATA 7/9/02 203273 Y.ZAPATA 7/9/02 VENDOR 107670 - NAPLES PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041640 20041473 589550 VENDOR 13690 - NAPLES PRINTING COMPANY 042767 129-156110-647110-33775 206622 PRINTING 042592 001-121810-647110-00000 159527 PRINTING POST CARD 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041645 20041645 20041645 20041645 589551 VENDOR 13700 - NAPLES RADIOLOGISTS 7/15,16 E.PREYSS 001-155930-631990-00000 203360 7/15,16 E.PREYSS 8/4 G.TOWNSEND 001-155930-631990-00000 203360 8/4 G.TOWNSEND 7/18-7/22 E.PREYSS 001-155930-631990-00000 203360 7/18-7/22 E.PREYSS 8/11 A. HAMPSON 001-155930-631990-00000 203360 8/11 A.HAMPSON 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 36.14 52.53 94.25 31.33 26.00 65.91 472.55 CHECK TOTAL 3,100.00 226.00 CHECK TOTAL 152.75 39.00 403.00 22.75 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 142 VCHR NET 1,342.90 36.14 52.53 94.25 31.33 26.00 65.91 472.55 778.71 3,100.00 226.00 3,326.00 152.75 39.00 403.00 22.75 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041645 20041645 20041645 DESCRIPTION 7/12 7/14 E. NERIO 203360 7/12 7/14 E.NERIO 8/13 R.GARCIA 203360 8/13 R.GARCIA 8/10 R. C~%RCIA 203360 8/10 R.C~kRCIA COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041647 20041647 589947 VENDOR 319080 - NAPLES SAFARI ANIMAL HOSPITAL E.GRIGGS 02-10035 610-155410-631970-00000 201043 E.GRIGGS 02-10035 A.LONG 02-10582 610-155410-631970-00000 201043 A.LONG 02-10582 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589981 VENDOR 333370 - NAPLES SURGICAL ASSOCIATES 20041468 8/16 J. WOOD 001-155930-634101-00000 160127 8/16 J. WOOD 0.00 CHECK NO 590091 20041281 209 206264 PARTS 20041281 206 206264 PARTS 20041281 212 206264 PARTS 20041281 203 206264 PARTS 20041281 199 206264 PARTS VENDOR 359990 - NAPLES TRUCK PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303700 590191 VENDOR 900050 - NASSAU POOLS CONST. REF 356433 NASSAU POOLS C 113-000000-115420-00000 NASSAU POOLS CONST. 0.00 AMT NET 78. O0 35.75 260.00 CHECK TOTAL 75.00 75. O0 CHECK TOTAL 823.55 CHECK TOTAL 100.00 69.80 370.09 132.45 345.86 CHECK TOTAL 50,00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 78.00 35.75 260.00 991.25 75. O0 75.00 150.00 823.55 823.55 50.00 1.018.20 345.86 132.45 370.09 69.80 100.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041307 589847 VENDOR 272820 - NATIONS RENT OF FLORIDA, INC. 35-1099273/103803 001-122240-644600-00000 NATIONS RENT OF FLORIDA, INC. 0.00 CHECK NO 20041459 589869 VENDOR 278890 - NEWS-PRESS 0001793149 201319 ADVERTISING 681-421510-648160-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041276 589763 VENDOR 223060 - NEWSPAPER PRINTING COMPANY 60012 111-156341-647110-00000 206934 BASE COST 0.00 CHECK NO 20041648 20041649 20041650 20041282 20041641 20441644 20041643 20041648 589889 VENDOR 286930 - NEXTEL 627335411/ 7/15-8/14 201221 627335411 7/15-8/14 0002012526-6 6/15-7/14 201241 0002012526-6 6/15-7/14 845596418 7/15-8/14 201192 845596418 7/15-8/14 666517413 7/15-8/14 202371 666517413 7/15-8/14 544365411 7/15-8/14 201108 544365411 7/15-8/14 640815410 7/15-8/14 202070 640815410 7/15-8/14 801245412 7/15-8/14 201275 801245412 7/15-8/14 627335411 7/15-8/14 202501 627335411 7/15-8/14 470-173410-641700-00000 408-210151-641700-00000 473-173413-641700-00000 001-121810-649990-00000 408-233351-641700-00000 495-192310-641700-00000 001-122240-641700-00000 470-173410-641700-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 44.50 CHECK TOTAL 86.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,756.00 CHECK TOTAL 87.49 303.07 344.29 110.38 1,000.54 129.48 675.30 492.60 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 144 VCHR NET 50.00 44.50 44.50 86.00 86.00 2,756.00 2,756.00 87.49 303.07 344.29 110.38 1,000.54 129.48 675.30 492.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,143.15 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 303744 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 590192VENDOR 900050 - NOEMI B. VILLAVERDE REFUND-PARKS NOEMI B.VILL 111-156390-634999-00000 REFUND NOEMI B. VILLAVERDE ANT DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20041465 20041465 20042036 20041465 589927 VENDOR 310560 - NORA SEHEULT 9/4 3.5 8:30-12:00 9/4 3,5 8:30-12:00 8/30 4HRS 8:00-12:00 8/30 4HRS 8:00-12:00 8/7 1.5 HRS 3:30-5:00 8/7 1.5HRS 3:30-5:00 9/3 6HRS 7:00-1:00 9/3 6HRS 7:00-1:00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-421190-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 681-431590-634402-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041467 20041467 590131 VENDOR 363270 - NORTH NAPLES FAMILY CARE E. PREYSS 8/2/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160128 E. PREYSS 8/02/02 7/29 E. PREYSS 001-155930-631210-00000 160128 7/29 E. PREYSS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041450 589914 VENDOR 304380 - NORTRAX EQUIPMENT COMPANY 2071147 101-163620-764150-00000 206660 EQUIPMENT 0.00 CHECK NO 20042037 589764 VENDOR 224230 - NTC DEVELOPMENT PERMIT# VRSFP-99-03 670-000000-220113-00000 NTC DEVELOPMENT 0.00 CHECK NO 590193 VENDOR 900050 - OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP 303724 CASH BOND REF. 670-000000-220331-00000 OCEAN BLVD./BARRON COLLIER COMPANIES 0.00 AMT NET 185.00 CHECK TOTAL 56.00 64.00 24.00 96.00 CHECK TOTAL 33.53 125.98 CHECK TOTAL 64,995.00 CHECK TOTAL 4,125.00 CHECK TOTAL 131,845.72 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 145 VCHR NET 185.00 185.00 56.00 64.00 24.00 96.00 240.00 33.53 125.98 159.51 64,995.00 64,995.00 4,125.00 4,125.00 131,845.72 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20042288 589461 VENDOR 285590 - OFFICE MAX DIGITAL CAMEP~A AND 111-163646-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042289 589462 VENDOR 285590 - OFFICE MAX DIGITAL C~JqERA AND 101-163624-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041646 590066 VENDOR 354290 - OLDE NAPLES SELF STORAGE 02004 9/19/02 MONTHLY INV 101-163612-644170-00000 204992 STOP, AGE 0.00 CHECK NO 20042038 590004 VENDOR 339380 - ONESOURCE 1148481 203794 CLEANING OF TMAILER 001-122240-646210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041456 20041457 589660 VENDOR 157710 - ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY INC. 439329202-01 111-156341-652990-00000 202394 SUPPLIES 437744543-01 111-156381-652990-00000 202396 SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042150 589769 VENDOR 229780 - PAPER DIRECT, INC. 336095820101 158874 WALL PLAQUE KITS 001-157110-652990-00000 001-157110-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589756 VENDOR 216160 - PARAGON ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS 16J AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 549.97 CHECK TOTAL 549.97 CHECK TOTAL 189.00 CHECK TOTAL 42.56 CHECK TOTAL 789.40 290.37 CHECK TOTAL 735.68 23.95 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 146 VCHR NET 131,845.72 549.97 549.97 549.97 549.97 189.00 189. O0 42.56 42.56 789.40 290.37 1,079.77 759.63 759.63 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041449 1784 8/30/02 206645 LABOR 20041313 1781 PAI~AGON ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652992-00000 0.00 495-192370-646970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041463 590030 VENDOR 345730 - PATRICE C. Ft~CK. M.D. W.WALLEN 01-2077-CFA 681-421190-631010-00000 W. WALLEN 01-2077-CFA 16J CHECK NO 20041996 20042167 589848 VENDOR 273080 - PATRICIA ROSEN 8/1-28 TRVL P.ROSEN 111-156341-640200-00000 8/1-28 TRVL P.ROSEN 8/6 TRVL P.ROSEN 111-156341-640200-00000 8/6 TRVL P.ROSEN AMI' NET VCHR DISC 5,658.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042299 20042299 20042299 589922 2439 K.TIMMONS 01-O01512CF-LLM 2435 E.WARRINER 2410 R.DURAND 95-1564CF-LLM VENDOR 307770 - PAUL S KLING, PHD 681-421190-631010-00000 681-431590-631010-00000 681-421190-631010-00000 1 PAGE 147 VCHR NET 5.658.00 CHECK NO 20041475 20041305 20041306 589791 1692 159610 BUSINESS CARDS 1691 159413 BUSINESS CARDS 1690 159400 BUSINESS CARDS VENDOR 247350 - PEDERSEN PRINTING 001-156110-647110-00000 518-121630-647110-00000 490-144610-634999-00000 793.98 0.00 793.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,451.98 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 400.00 0.00 111.65 0.00 111.65 0.00 84.50 0.00 84.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 196.15 0.00 280.00 0.00 280.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 210.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 700.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 90.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20041274 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 589654VENDOR 152460 - PELUSO MOVERS INC. 11831/9211 198-157410-634999-00000 200577 STORAGE FEES AMT DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20041856 590003 VENDOR 339260 - PERFECTION ALUMINUM 10440 001-156110-634999-00000 159830 SCREEN PORCH AREA 0.00 CHECK NO 20041460 20041460 20041460 589813 8/7/02 J. HELVESTON 160129 8/7/02 J. HELVESTON 8/12/02 I.DOMKE 160129 8/12/02 I. DOMKE 8/16/02 I. DOMKE 160129 8/16/02 I. DOMKE VENDOR 257160 - PHILIP T. REGALA. M.D. 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 303725 590194 VENDOR 900050 - PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF SF REF IMPACT FEE PHOENIX AS 331-163650-363650-00000 PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF S.F 0.00 CHECK NO 20041462 20041469 589919 VENDOR 305460 - PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORPORATION 4673225-JN02 200103- RENTAL 7/20-10/20 109-182601-641950-00000 109-182900-641950-00000 778-182700-641950-00000 509379 159932 SOFTWARE 109-182601-651910-00000 109-182900-651910-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041466 590132 VENDOR 363280 - PLANNED PARENTHOOD OD COLLIER CO. 8/15 S.POCZEKAj 001-155930-634101-00000 160131 8/15 S. POCZEKAJ 0.00 AMT NET 134.66 CHECK TOTAL 945.00 CHECK TOTAL 65.00 295.10 65. O0 CHECK TOTAL 10.117.65 CHECK TOTAL 55.66 55.66 55.66 107.50 107.50 CHECK TOTAL 149.50 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 148 VCHR NET 134.66 134.66 945.00 945.00 65.00 295.10 65.00 425.10 10.117.65 10,117.65 166.98 215. O0 381.98 149.50 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041453 590063 VENDOR 352840 - POWER CALL SYSTEMS, INC 20025 408-210151-634999-00000 205057 SERVICE 0.00 CHECK NO 20041458 20041301 20041285 20041287 20041458 20041301 589810 PJ296133 200347 CYLINDER PJ341665 200924 PARTS P3342870 201040 CHEMICALS PJ345423 201815 CHEMICALS PJ328041 200347 CYLINDER PJ344111 200924 PARTS VENDOR 255770 - PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST,LLC 114-178975-652910-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 111-156332-646313-00000 408-253211-652990-00000 114-178975-652910-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041551 590024 VENDOR 345060 - PRECISION CARPENTRY & CONTRACTING 155 191-138785-884200-44200 #62263460001 TANGUMA 158719 0.00 CHECK NO 20041275 589983 VENDOR 333800 - PRINTERS INK 83919 206853 MAP BROCHURE 126-138333-647110-35020 0.00 CHECK NO 20041300 589698 VENDOR 174760 - PROCRAFT BATTERIES 421182056 521-122410-646425-00000 200698 BATTERIES 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 570.00 CHECK TOTAL 73.02 45.60 28.96 249.27 24.75 34.16 CHECK TOTAL 850.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,335.25 CHECK TOTAL 245.07 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 149 VCHR NET 149.50 570.00 570.00 73.02 45.60 28.96 249.27 24.75 34.16 455.76 850.00 850.00 1,335.25 1,335.25 245.07 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20042281 589838 VENDOR 267130 - PROFESSIONAL BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. 29567 111-156332-634999-00000 206932 LABOR 0.00 CHECK NO 20042151 589828 VENDOR 259910 - PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGIES S182752-000 159597 PHONE 001-121810-652910-00000 001-121810-641950-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041295 20041279 20041270 20041296 20041294 20041269 20041267 20041271 20041273 20041268 20041272 589962 VENDOR 325880 - PROSOURCE ONE 07663900 201463 CHEMICALS 07763700 200863 FERTILIZER 0771600 201463 FERTILZER 07714200 200264 FERTILIZER 07717300 201463 CHEMICALS 07713900 201464 FERTILIZER 0771440 200178 FERTILIZER 07721300 201463 FERTILIZER 07721400 200178 FERTILIZER 07715800 202118 FERTILIZER 07719900 201463 FERTILIZER 111-163646-652310-00000 001-156363-652310-00000 111-163646-652310-00000 160-162518-652310-00000 111-163646-652310-00000 111-163646-652310-00000 150-162545-652310-00000 111-163646-652310-00000 150-162545-652310-00000 111-163646-652310-00000 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ART NET CHECK TOTAL 17.448.00 CHECK TOTAL 450.00 10.00 CHECK TOTAL 113.05 1,728.40 742.40 269.14- 500.64- 613.12- 690.78- 277.08- 791.91- 46.40 154.51 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 245.07 17,448.00 17,448.00 460.00 460.00 113.05 1,728,40 742.40 269.14- 500.64- 613.12- 690.78- 277.08- 791.91- 46.40 154.51 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041266 20041272 20041261 20041273 20041295 20041294 20041296 20041268 20041296 20041295 20041293 20041266 20041261 20041273 20041295 20041294 20041293 DESCRIPTION 07714700 200174 FERTILIZER 07720800 201463 FERTILIZER 07593100 201467 FERTILIZER 07571600 200178 FERTILIZER 07663500 201463 CHEMICALS 07717400 201463 CHEMICALS 07592900 200264 FERTILIZER 07715700 202118 FERTILIZER 07714300 200264 FERTILIZER 07663400 201463 CHEMICALS 07560500 201463 FERTILIZER 07592700 200174 FERTILIZER 07714900 201467 FERTILIZER 07560400 200178 FERTILIZER 07663700 201463 CHEMICALS 07306300 201463 CHEMICALS 07721100 201463 FERTILIZER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 152-162541-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0,00 111-163646-652310-00000 0,00 150-162545-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0,00 160-162518-652310-00000 O.OO 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 160-162518-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0,00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 152-162541-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 150-162545-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET 358.85- 157.21- 352.01 791.91 139.65 519.68 269,14 44.85- 278.40 67.74 742.77 358.85 352.01- 839.42 15.93 500.64 742.77- 1 VCHR DISC 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 358.85- 157.21- 352.01 791.91 139.65 519.68 269.14 44.85- 278.40 67.74 742.77 358.85 352.01- 839,42 15.93 500.64 742.77- SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041293 07720000 201463 FERTILIZER 20041266 07714800 200174 FERTILIZER 20041272 07560600 201463 FERTILIZER 20041271 07560900 201463 FERTILIZER 20041270 07593400 201463 FERTILZER 20041273 07720700 200178 FERTILIZER 20041267 07592800 200178 FERTILIZER 20041268 07593000 202118 FERTILIZER 20041271 07720100 201463 FERTILIZER 20041269 07714000 201464 FERTILIZER 20041270 07715900 201463 FERTILZER 20041261 07715000 201467 FERTILIZER 20041273 07571500 200178 FERTILIZER 20041269 07593500 201464 FERTILIZER 20041267 07714500 200178 FERTILIZER 20041278 07751800 205773 CHEMICALS 20041295 07663800 201463 CHEMICALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 152-162541-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 150-162545-652310-00000 0.00 150-162545-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 150-162545-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 150-162545-652310-00000 0,00 001-156363-652310-00000 0.00 111-163646-652310-00000 0.00 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 734.67 0.00 PAGE VCHR NET 734.67 371.20 0.00 371.20 157.21 0.00 157.21 277.08 0.00 277.08 717.70 0.00 717.70 788.40 0.00 788.40 690.78 0.00 690.78 44.85 0.00 44,85 275.19 0.00 275.19 626.38 0.00 626.38 717.70- 0.00 717.70- 351.06 0.00 351.06 839.42- 0.00 839.42- 33.25 0.00 33.25 1,380.80 0.00 1.380.80 152 714.56 0.00 714.56 613.12 0.00 613,12 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 20041860 590025 VENDOR 345140 1254929 201615 9/02 CHECK NO 20041297 589928 VENDOR 312210 9969178 201607 TELEPHONE CHECK NO 20042093 589930 VENDOR 314210 105555 204881 HAZ. WASTE CHECK NO 20041298 589661 VENDOR 158120 1-04082338/3216-004-00 202020 FOOD CHECK NO 20041464 589846 VENDOR 272800 REF 356272 PULTE HOME COR PULTE HOME CORPORATION CHECK NO 20041302 20041288 20041454 20041288 589644 VENDOR 144550 321042 159800 SUPPLIES 320794 206711 SUPPLIES 320202 206754 SUPPLIES 320799 206711 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC PROVIDENT CAPITAL 001-157110-644620-00000 16J 1 PROVIDENT CAPITOL GROUP, INC. 001-157110-644620-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PSI 470-173410-634999-00000 0.00 PUBLIX //410 130-157710-652210-00000 PAGE 153 PULTE HOME CORPORATION 113-000000-115420-00000 VCHR NET 9,081.67 PYRAMID II JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-156363-652510-00000 0.00 230.98 0.00 230.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 230.98 0.00 354.91 0.00 354.91 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 354.91 9,365.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,365.00 9.365.00 111-156332-652510-00000 0.00 130-157710-652510-00000 0.00 111-156332-652510-00000 0.00 0.00 81.56 0.00 81.56 81.90 0.00 81.90 150.00 0.00 150.00 912.00 0.00 912.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 146.55 0.00 146.55 0.00 146.55 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 73.36 0.00 73.36 0.00 73.36 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041289 319765 206754 SUPPLIES 20041642 320334 206711 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 130-157710-652510-00000 0.00 111-156332-652510-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041859 589741 VENDOR 202510 - PYRAMID II, INC. 322503 001-155410-652510-00000 160196 CITRI SOLV 0.00 CHECK NO 20042210 20042210 20042211 589845 #9 REIMB. 102644 TO 7/29/02 #9 RELEASE RETAINAGE 102644 TO 7/29/02 RELEASE RETAINAGE #7 CONSTRUCTION 102642 TO 7/29/02 VENDOR 272640 - QUALITY CONTROL BUILDERS, INC 496-192340-763100-33326 496-000000-205100-00000 496-192340-763100-33326 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041651 589743 VENDOR 202830 - QUICK KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES 12328 521-122410-646425-00000 159230 KEYS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041774 590135 VENDOR 363390 - R.K. JACKSON COMPANY LIBRARY BREAK ROOM 612-156110-634999-00000 160051 LIBRARY BREAK ROOM 0.00 CHECK NO 20042256 20042256 589884 VENDOR 285410 - RADIOLOGY REGIONAL CENTER A ESCOBAR 8/01 001-155930-631990-00000 A ESCOBAR 8/01 207214 B MASON 7/23 001-155930-631990-00000 B MASON 7/23 207214 0.00 0.00 16J AMT NET 150.00 1,001.17 CHECK TOTAL 406.64 CHECK TOTAL 2,691.00 6,308.00 1,300.00 CHECK TOTAL 327.20 CHECK TOTAL 725.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,879.96 199.71 1 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 154 VCHR NET 150.00 1,001.17 2,376.63 406.64 406.64 2,691.00 6,308.00 1,300.00 10,299.00 327.20 327.20 725.00 725.00 1,879.96 199.71 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042256 G WEAHELEY 7/15 G WEAHELEY 7/15 207214 20042256 B DRUGE 7/30 B DRUGE 7/30 207214 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589689 20042157 083174 157890 SUPPLIES 20042157 RTNO01623 157890 SUPPLIES 20042157 083255 157890 SUPPLIES VENDOR 170630 - RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 111-156313-652990-00000 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1,611.36 0.00 PAGE CHECK NO 20040511 VCHR NET 1,611.36 315.69 0.00 315.69 CHECK NO 20041251 20041253 20038989 20041252 20041930 20040026 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,006.72 0.00 883.85 0.00 883.85 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 589688 VENDOR 170590 - RECREONICS CORPORATION 270768 111-156313-652910-00000 157888 COMPETITOR RACING LANES 589854 VENDOR 275110 - REDDY ICE CORPORATION 408-210130-652990-00000 408-253212-652990-00000 408-210130-652990-00000 408-210130-652990-00000 408-253212-652990-00000 408-253212-652990-00000 5.75- 0.00 5.75- 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 0.00 61.20 0.00 61.20 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 0.00 82.80 0.00 82.80 130336 200245 ICE 136947 200245 ICE 132129 202246 ICE 0.00 82.80 0.00 82.80 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 0.00 845.99 0.00 845.99 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 997.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 845.99 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 442.80 132278 202246 ICE 130151 200245 ICE 132135 202246 ICE 155 119.60 0.00 119.60 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20041864 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 589786 VENDOR 240490 - REGENT BOOK COMPANY INC. 371592 307-156110-766100-00000 160055 POOH'S CHRISTMAS GIFT DISC 16J 1 CHECK NO 20042424 590081 VENDOR 358070 - RENDON PAINTING VARSALLO 9/11 191-138785-884200-33752 32680120006 VARSALLO 207186 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 20041794 589798 VENDOR 254040 - RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION 13060177-001 408-253211-644600-00000 156158 DIESEL FUEL PAGE 156 CHECK NO 20041936 20041936 589789 VENDOR 245490 - REVERE LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 45326 5/20/02 001-454010-654110-00000 202084 EGAL UPDATES FI 01/02 46326 DUI DEFENSE UPDATE 001-454010-654110-00000 202084 EGAL UPDATES FI 01/02 VCHR NET 0.00 10.91 0.00 10.91 CHECK NO 20042062 20042062 20042062 589935 12 279987 158251 SUPPLIES 12 280090 158251 SUPPLIES 12 279988 158251 SUPPLIES VENDOR 315150 - REXEL CONSOLIDATED 001-122240-652993-00000 001-122240-652993-00000 001-122240-652993-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.91 1,200.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20040026 20040026 589971 VENDOR 328990 - REXFORD G. DARROW, II J DAVIS O0 574 CFA 681-421190-631020-00000 202296 J DAVIS O0 574 CFA J ALVAREZ 01 1682 CFA 681-421190-631020-00000 202296 J ALVA. REZ 01 1682 CFA 0.00 1,200.00 1,200,00 0.00 536,25 0.00 536.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 536.25 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 0,00 41.00 0.00 41.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 83.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 900.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 195.76 0.00 35.76 0.00 35.76 0.00 146.31 0.00 146.31 0.00 13.69 0.00 13.69 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041935 589690 VENDOR 170740 - RITA ROSE MEYER 8/2-9/6 BALLET TAP 111-156380-634999-00000 201001 8/2-9/6 BALLET TAP 16J 1 CHECK NO 303706 303704 590195 VENDOR 900050 - RIVERS DRILLING REF 184790 RIVERS DRILLG 113-138900-322270-00000 RIVERS DRILLG REF 184790 REF 184792 RIVERS DRILLG 113-138900-322270-00000 RIVERS DRILLG REF 184792 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 157 CHECK NO 20041250 20041920 20041933 20041932 20041934 589877 VENDOR 281860 - ROBBINS C4496-0806 201274 ANSWERING SVS C4495-0802 204399 ANSWEING SVS C4494-0802 206325 ANSWERING SVS C4498-0802 206679 ANSWERING SVS C4497-0802 204847 ANSWERING SVS TELECOMMUNICATIONS 001-122240-641150-00000 408-210105-641150-00000 101-163620-634999-00000 470-173410-634999-00000 408-233352-641150-00000 VCHR NET 1,800.00 0.00 533.00 0.00 533.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 533.00 0.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 CHECK NO 20041998 589811 VENDOR 255920 - ROBERT CASEY 9/8-10 TRVL R.CASEY 9/8-10 TRVL R.CASEY 408-233313-640300-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 64.00 CHECK NO 303695 590169 VENDOR 900040 - ROBERT L RUSSELL R RUSSELL 06623173001 408-000000-115001-00000 R RUSSELL 3733 ROYAL WOOD BLVD 0.00 137.50 0.00 137.50 0.00 341.80 0.00 341.80 0.00 135.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 17.45 0.00 17.45 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 661.75 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 12. O0 0.00 57.84 0.00 57.84 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041363 589931 VENDOR 314290 - ROBERT TWEEDIE PETTY CASH 495-192350-652990-00000 PETTY CASH 0.00 CHECK NO 303696 590170 VENDOR 900040 - ROBERT ZVOCEC R ZVOCEC 08101358200 R ZVOCEC 177 KATHY LN LOT-1 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303753 303751 303750 303752 590196 VENDOR 900050 - ROD GARNER REFUND ADOPT-R GARNER REFUND ADOPT-R GARNER REFUND ADOPT-R GARNER REFUND AI)OPT-R GARNER REFUND ADOPT-R G/~RNER REFUND ADOPT-R GARNER REFUND ADOPT-R GARNER REFUND ADOPT-R GARNER 610-155410-329810-00000 610-155410-346450-00000 001-155410-346410-00000 001-155410-329810-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041999 590112 VENDOR 362200 - ROGER KASTEL 9/8-10 TRVL R.KASTEL 9/8-10 TRVL R.KASTEL 408-233313-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041247 8/26 SLAT HANGER 158248 REPLACE CURTAIN ON SLAT 20042064 COL S 3/03 158261 2 CURTAINS FOR NEW SHERIFF 20041248 9/3 .3 ELERO 158252 REPLACE 562 SOMFY 590125 VENDOR 363120 - ROLL SECURE SHUTTERS, INC. 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 25.78 CHECK TOTAL 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 6.10 30.00 20.00 6.00 CHECK TOTAL 12. O0 CHECK TOTAL 487.00 640.00 600.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 57.84 25.78 25.78 150.00 150.00 6.10 30.00 20.00 6.00 62.10 12.00 12.00 487.00 640.00 600.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BO~RD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 303705 590197 VENDOR 900050 - ROLSAFE REF 338750 ROLSAFE ROLSAFE REF 338750 113-138900-322110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042061 590111 VENDOR 362170 - ROOMS TO GO 7285415 160225 FURNITURE FOR STAFF ROOM 001-156145-651930-00000 0.00 001-156145-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303707 590198 VENDOR 900050 - ROSS H MANELLA PA REF 351342 R MANELLA 113-138900-343907-00000 ROSS MANELLA REF 351342 16J CHECK NO 20041782 589973 VENDOR 329260 - ROY ANDERSON REIMB PHOTOS 160097 REIMB PHOTOS 408-210155-647210-00000 ~ NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 20041259 589785 VENDOR 240040 - ROYAL STEAMER, INC. 389978 111-156395-634999-00000 207013 SYSTEM TILE AND GROUT PAGE 159 CHECK NO 20041931 590022 VENDOR 344370 - RUSH MESSENGER SERVICE WEST, INC 00022703 200523 COURIER SVS 8/16-8/30 109-182601-641950-00000 109-182900-641950-00000 778-182700-641950-00000 VCHR NET 1,727.00 CHECK NO 20041781 589899 VENDOR 294080 - RUSSELL TROUTMAN M.D. R C~RCIA 8/14-15/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160132 R C~ARCIA 8/14-15/02 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 789.97 84.99 0.00 874.96 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 874.96 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 25.88 0.00 25.88 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.88 0,00 2,000.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 47.75 0.00 47.75 0.00 20.00 0.00 2.000.00 2.000.00 115.50 0.00 197.60 0.00 197.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 115.50 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041937 589958 VENDOR 325750 - RWA INC. 9833 204402 CONSULTING 111-138317-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042257 589907 VENDOR 297410 - RYDER ORTHOPEDICS 3750 001-155930-652810-00000 207244 PERSON CARE ITEMS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041946 20039568 20039568 20041946 589837 354982 201131 SUPPLIES 355350 159614 SUPPLIES 355489 159614 SUPPLIES 358246 201131 SUPPLIES VENDOR 267020 - SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 101-163620-652140-00000 518-121630-652990-00000 518-121630-652990-00000 101-163620-652140-00000 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 160 VCHR NET 197,60 CHECK NO 20042240 20041801 589816 18910 158213 QUALITATIVE TEST 01183 159975 QUAL FIT TEST APPARATUS VENDOR 258050 - SAFETY SUPPLY WAREHOUSE 001-122240-652720-00000 518-121630-652990-00000 250.00 0.00 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 250.00 CHECK NO 20041603 20041602 589712 VENDOR 184630 - SAM GALLOWAY FORD 588144 521-122410-646425-00000 200926 PARTS AND CREDITS 91007 521-122410-646425-00000 200926 PARTS 2.856.66 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0,00 2,856.66 2,856.66 0.00 92.70 0.00 92.70 0.00 27.50 0.00 27.50 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 5,734.58 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 5,734.58 5,909.78 0.00 245.12 0.00 245.12 0,00 119.58 0.00 119.58 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 465.00 0.00 310.00 0.00 310.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 155.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20039607 CM584409 200926 PART AND CREDITS 20041600 589065 200926 PARTS 20041776 FTCS589567 158774 REPAIRS 20041600 589841 200926 PARTS 20041600 589975 200926 PARTS 20041602 591053 200926 PARTS 20041603 573039 200926 PARTS AND CREDITS 20041600 590222 200926 PARTS 20041602 591145 200926 PARTS 20041603 CM5730393 200926 PARTS AND CREDITS 20041600 589728 200926 PARTS 20041600 590785 200926 PARTS 20039607 CM584427 200926 PART AND CREDITS 20041603 588969 200926 PARTS AND CREDITS 20039607 586179 200926 PART AND CREDITS 20041600 586585 200926 PARTS 20041603 588636 200926 PARTS AND CREDITS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET 19.02- 496.98 268.08 2.86 38.89 80.47 24.00 25.65 25.65 24.00- 195.72 100.53 45,00- 47.32 53.04 146.11 162.93 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 19.02- 161 496.98 268.08 2.86 38.89 80.47 24.00 25.65 25.65 24.00- 195.72 100.53 45.00- 47.32 53.04 146.11 162.93 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20039607 CM584184 200926 PART AND CREDITS 20041600 CM589065 200926 PARTS 20041600 588526 200926 PARTS 20041603 CM5744802 200926 PARTS AND CREDITS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20040515 589665 VENDOR 159590 - SAW'S CLUB #6364 NAPLES 101 51366342988 8/28 001-156110-652210-00000 159697 101 51366342988 8/28 0.00 CHECK NO 20041948 589467 VENDOR 363840 - SANDRA MORRIS J MORRIS 9/02 RENT AND 001-155930-634153-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303693 590171 VENDOR 900040 - SANDRA NEUMAN S NEUMAN 04804856001 S NEUMAN 219 VIA PERIGNON 408-000000-115001-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041611 20041611 20041611 20041611 20041611 589699 VENDOR 174790 - SATCO 238127 200428 SULFURIC ACID 238244 200428 SULFURIC ACID 238086 200428 SULFURIC ACID 238075 200428 SULFURIC ACID 238311 200428 SULFURIC ACID 408-253221-652310-00000 408-253221-652310-00000 408-253221-652310-00000 408-253221-652310-00000 408-253221-652310-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 53.04- 193.05- 14.21 311.78- CHECK TOTAL 86.29 CHECK TOTAL 400.00 CHECK TOTAL 10.98 CHECK TOTAL 1,105.83 1,102.74 1,122.17 1,112.45 1,128.80 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 53.04- 193.05- 14.21 311.78- 400.00 400.00 10.98 10.98 1,105.83 1,102.74 1,122.17 1,112.45 1.128.80 86.29 86.29 1.401.25 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041611 238245 200428 SULFURIC ACID 20041611 238134 200428 SULFURIC ACID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-253221-652310-00000 0.00 408-253221-652310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041802 20041802 590007 VENDOR 339700 - SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORP. 50899277 CR 001-155410-652720-00000 159984 SUTURES 17592207 001-155410-652720-00000 159984 SUTURES 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041256 20041255 20041582 20041255 20041257 20042244 20041583 20041255 20041258 20041255 589726 90003370 200733 PAINT SUPPLIES 90003252 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 90003410 200429 PAINT SUPPLIES 90003235 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 90003298 200429 SUPPLIES 90003569 159679 PAINT REUSED PIPES 90003411 200248 PAINT SUPPLIES 90003279 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 90003368 200248 PAINT SUPPLIES 90003240 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES VENDOR 193330 - SCO1-F PAINT CORP. 408-210130-652990-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 408-253221-652990-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 408-253221-652990-00000 408-233352-652910-00000 408-253212-652990-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 408-253212-652990-00000 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 1,131.89 1,115.54 CHECK TOTAL 803.20- 868.43 CHECK TOTAL 38.74 30.98 13.62 76.21 41.54 581.89 35.59 151.74 134.37 81.72 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 1,131.89 1,115.54 7,819.42 803.20- 868.43 65,23 38.74 30.98 13.62 76,21 41.54 581.89 35.59 151.74 134.37 81.72 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041581 90003508 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 20041256 90003372 200733 PAINT SUPPLIES 20041256 8733 200733 PAINT SUPPLIES 20041583 90003445 200248 PAINT SUPPLIES 20041234 90003333 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 20041256 90003371 200733 PAINT SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 408-210130-652990-00000 0.00 408-210130-652990-00000 0.00 408-253212-652990-00000 0,00 001-122240-652999-00000 0.00 408-210130-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041612 589639 VENDOR 139410 - SCREEN PRINTING UNLIMITED 16439 408-253212-654370-00000 206643 WATER DROPLET STESS BALLS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041655 589750 VENDOR 211140 - SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY 0227935 191-138785-884100-33752 36250600004 O. URIQUA 206860 0.00 CHECK NO 589970 VENDOR 328280 - SEDA 20041797 MEMBER-M THAMPI 159497 M THAMPI DUES 408-210155-654210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 590126 VENDOR 363180 - SERGIO VALDES 20041786 REIMB GAS 159947 REIMB GAS 146-144380-652410-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589866 VENDOR 278480 - SEVERN TRENT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AMT NET 158.05 60.09 112.06- 93.42 5.69 112.06 CHECK TOTAL 2,250.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,189.98 CHECK TOTAL 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 61.32 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 158.05 60.09 112.06- 112.06 1,503.65 2,250.00 2,250.00 1,189.98 1,189.98 50.00 50.00 61,32 61,32 164 5.69 93.42 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041943 71366 203522 INSTALL RADIO READ METERS 20041943 71367 203522 INSTALL P, ADIO READ METERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMI' DISC 412-273511-634999-70076 0.00 412-273511-634999-70076 0.00 CHECK NO 589879 20041553 35073 201268 PLUMBING 20041553 38371 201268 PLUMBING 20041939 35085 206869 REPAIR AND UPGRADE 20041553 35075 201268 PLUMBING VENDOR 282410 - SHAMROCK PLUMBING & MECHANICAL INC 001-122240-652994-00000 0.00 001-122240-652994-00000 0.00 301-120402-763100-80172 0.00 001-122240-652994-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042041 589966 VENDOR 326350 - SHARON FRYE REIMB FOR FOOD 15990 S FRYE REIMB FOR FOOD 001-121152-652210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042255 20042255 20042255 20042255 20042255 589883 G WEATHERLEY 7/11,8/05,12 G WEATHERLEY 7/11,8/05,12 207215 VENDOR 284700 - SHARON L. JOHNSTON, D.O. 001-155930-631210-00000 B DRUGE 8/19 B DRUGE 8/19 207215 G CLARK 8/12 G CLARK 8/12 207215 B DRUGE 8/02 B DRUGE 8/02 207215 B DRUGE 7/30 B DRUGE 7/30 207215 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 001-155930-631210-00000 0.00 AMT NET 9,957.50 425.67 CHECK TOTAL 770.00 426.80 19,240.00 540.00 CHECK TOTAL 18.62 CHECK TOTAL 650.00 562.25 130.00 97.50 520.00 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 165 VCHR NET 9,957.50 425.67 10,383.17 770.00 426.80 19,240.00 540.00 20,976.80 18.62 18.62 650.00 562.25 130.00 97.50 520.00 1,959.75 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 589733 20042294 20042294 20042294 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DISC 121-138755-640300-34500 0.00 121-138755-640300-34500 0.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 198170 - SHERATON BISCAYNE BAY CONF#117201790/REG-LANGHO 160281 - REGIST-LANGHORN CONF#117201790/REG-COMBS 160281 - REGIST-COMBS CONF#117201790/REG-YOUNG 160281 - REGIST-YOUNG 121-138755-640300-34500 0.00 CHECK NO 20042214 590067 VENDOR 354360 - SHEREE KREN 8/10-9/10/02 204996 ACTING INSTR. 111-156380-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041792 589646 VENDOR 147180 - SHESHUNOFF INFORMATION SERVICES INC 9734608 159945 SLG EMPL LAW & PRAC H~J~DBOOK 001-121810-654110-00000 0.00 001-121810-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041249 589984 VENDOR 333860 · SHORELINE FLOORING SUPPLIES 622650 001-122240-652990-00000 158274 CLEARSET 4 GAL SOLVENT FREE 16J CHECK NO 20041246 20041790 589554 VENDOR 16950 - SIGN CRAFT 19736 157632 LOGO SANDBLASTED 19767 158591 SANDBLAST SIGN 001-156363-646316-00000 313-163673-646316-60031 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1 CHECK NO 20041791 589829 VENDOR 260690 - SIGNCRAFT 19179 156118 LOGOS 111-156349-652990-00000 PAGE 166 VCHR NET 196.00 0.00 196.00 196.00 0.00 196.00 196.00 0.00 196.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 588.00 2,239.25 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 295.00 31.95 0.00 2. 239.25 2,239,25 326.95 CHECK TOTAL 0,00 326.95 0,00 25.50 0.00 25,50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.50 0.00 775.00 0.00 775.00 0.00 330.00 0.00 330.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,105.00 0.00 238.00 0.00 238.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20040512 19827 157447 PORTION OF LABOR COST FLAG COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156381-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041604 589579 VENDOR 105270 - SIGNS OF NAPLES 5803 408-253212-634999-00000 200279 SIGNS 0.00 CHECK NO 20042213 20040022 590080 VENDOR 357890 - SIRSI CORPORATION 203299 001-156175-634999-00000 207171 NEll~ORK ACCESS 203072 129-156110-634210-33775 206183 USERS FEES FOR FY 02 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041574 20041777 20041574 20041575 20041575 20041575 20041575 589601 14853 200701 SUPPLIES 015129 160199 OIL CAP 14835 200701 SUPPLIES 014915 200701 SUPPLIES 015027 200701 SUPPLIES 15026 200701 SUPPLIES 14945 200701 SUPPLIES VENDOR 114210 - SMALL ENGINE WORLD 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041947 589755 VENDOR 215640 - SNAP-ON-TOOLS 77235 206821 SUPPLIES 521-122410-764900-00000 0.00 AMT NET 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 325.00 CHECK TOTAL 4,257.90 2,990.00 CHECK TOTAL 16J 3.17 1.02 20.72 36.11 49.40 15.08 36.11 CHECK TOTAL 6,195.00 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 167 VCHR NET 250.00 488. O0 325,00 325.00 4,257.90 2,990.00 7,247.90 3.17 1.02 20.72 36.11 49.40 15.08 36.11 161.61 6,195.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041605 77089 200702 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-652910-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589929 20042063 8BF22 159723 VISIO STANDARD LICENSE 20041599 4C03B 204558 SOFTWARE AND LICENSING 20041784 6E11D 153839 FRONT PAGE 2000 VENDOR 313450 - SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 001-121143-652920-00000 0.00 408-233351-652920-00000 0.00 408-210111-652920-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589555 VENDOR 17260 - SOLINET 20041613 299814 201705 USER'S FEE FOR FY 02 129-156110-634210-33775 0.00 CHECK NO 20041778 20041778 589937 VENDOR 315770 - SOUTH FLORIDA INPATIENT MEDICAL B DRILICH 7/18,7/22 001-155930-631210-00000 160133 B DRILICH 7/18, 7/22 E PREYSS 7/15-23/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160133 E PREYSS 7/15-23/02 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041992 589464 VENDOR 318510 - SOUTH SEAS RESORT 5837BH R.HOVELL 9/25-27 195-110407-640300-00000 AND 0.00 CHECK NO 20041616 589738 VENDOR 201320 - SOUTHEASTERN EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT 447390 490-144610-652720-00000 206831 EMERGANCY EQUIPTMENT 0.00 CHECK NO 590113 VENDOR 362360 - SOUTHERN COAST PAINTING, INC. AMT NET 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 104.71 982.36 74.24 CHECK TOTAL 2. 769.29 CHECK TOTAL 238.55 728.00 CHECK TOTAL 104.00 CHECK TOTAL 1.143.36 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 168 VCHR NET 15.00 6,210.00 104.71 982.36 74.24 1.161.31 2.769.29 2,769.29 238.55 728.00 966.55 104.00 104.00 1,143.36 1,143.36 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041656 150-12262 35767240000 J. FRANCOIS 206902 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 191-138785-884100-44200 0.00 CHECK NO 20041944 589749 VENDOR 210810 - SOUTHERN SERVICES 1716 111-163645-634999-00000 204157 MONTHLY MOWING CONTRACT 0.00 CHECK NO 20041793 589664 VENDOR 158780 - SOUTHERN TREE FARMS 10579 109-182901-634254-00000 159587 LIVE OAK TREE 16J 1 CHECK NO 20041606 20041606 20041576 589878 627 203912 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 628 203912 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 626 203564 ON CALL ELECTRICAL SVS VENDOR 282370 - SOUTHWEST ELECTRIC, INC. 408-253221-634999-00000 408-253221-634999-00000 408-253211-634999-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1,200.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,925.60 0.00 CHECK NO 20041614 20041615 20041614 589731 i 02535 02 201266 ON CALL PAINTING CONTRACTORS 600 4760 PAINTING SUPPLIES I 02535 03 201266 ON CALL PAINTING CONTRACTORS VENDOR 195660 - SPECTRUM PAINTING & RESTORATION 001-122240-639961-00000 301-120435-763100-80506 001-122240-639961-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 169 VCHR NET 1,200.00 CHECK NO 20041785 589556 VENDOR 10207056 159379 BOARD 17410 - SPEEDY BLUEPRINTING 306-116360-652910-00175 1,200.00 9,925.60 9,925.60 0.00 160.00 0.00 160.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 160.00 0.00 357.50 0.00 357.50 0.00 325.42 0.00 325.42 0.00 283.57 0.00 283.57 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 966.49 0.00 391.84 0.00 391.84 0.00 0.00 2,040.00 0.00 2,042,29 0,00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,040.00 2,042.29 4,474.13 0.00 237.50 0.00 237.50 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042241 10207122 160150 PLAN CLAMPS 20041598 1207267 203930 SUPPLIES FOR HP 20040518 10206696 159759 ROLATAPE 400 20042241 10207278 160150 PLAN CLAMPS 20042219 10207179 205108 PRINTS 20041597 10207356 206364 ENGINEER AND SURVEY SUPPLIES 20039587 10206918 159499 SUPPLIES 20042219 10206983 205108 PRINTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-651110-00000 0.00 408-210111-651110-00000 0.00 101-163630-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-651110-00000 0.00 313-162111-647110-00000 0.00 101-163640-651910-00000 0.00 113-138312-652990-00000 0.00 313-162111-647110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041772 590118 VENDOR 362650 - SPER SCIENTIFIC LTD 27224 518-121630-649990-00000 159724 CALIBRATE SOUND METER 0.00 CHECK NO 20041627 20041315 20041628 20041627 20041626 589794 VENDOR 250020 - SPRINT 470832040 8/20 470832040 8/20 471959120 6/30 471959120 6/30 370725485 8/26 370725485 8/26 410262055 8/13 410262055 8/13 923011246 8/26 923011246 8/26 408-210130-641100-00000 001-000000-202800-00000 111-156381-641900-00000 111-156395-641900-00000 001-157110-641900-00000 101-163620-641900-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 85.50 968.00 128.00 320.44 49.14 77.90 208.05 78.62 CHECK TOTAL 40.50 CHECK TOTAL 14.94 67.26 19,24 8.45 89.61 41.08 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 170 VCHR NET 85.50 968.00 128.00 320.44 49.14 77.90 208.05 78.62 2,153.15 40.50 40.50 14.94 67,26 27.69 89.61 41.08 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 1 PAGE VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20041626 923391057 8/24 923391057 8/24 408-233312-641100-00000 0.00 19.49 0.00 19.49 20041628 370725485 8/26 370725485 8/26 111-156332-641900-00000 0.00 111-156310-641900-00000 0.00 111-156313-641900-00000 0.00 111-156390-641900-00000 0.00 111-156349-641900-00000 0.00 111-156341-641900-00000 0.00 130-157710-641900-00000 0.00 001-156363-641900-00000 0.00 111-156380-641900-00000 0.00 111-156343-641900-00000 0.00 31.54 89.76 50.04 32.40 117.48 5.82 51.97 67.40 4.82 35,76 0.00 486.99 20041627 463017895 8/10 463017895 8/10 001-010110-641210-00000 0.00 7.04 0.00 7.04 20041315 471959120 7/31 471959120 7/31 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 72.70 0.00 72.70 20041627 484799095 8/12 484799095 8/12 001-155410-641900-00000 0.00 001-155410-641200-00000 0.00 29.34 54.44 0.00 83.78 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 910.58 CHECK NO 589809 VENDOR 255040 - SPRINT 20041630 093 2466 572 8/16 9/15 093 2466 572 8/16 9/15 001-121143-641900-00000 0.00 205,00 0.00 205.00 20042251 353 4244 543 8/25 9/24 353 4244 543 8/25 9/24 001-157110-641900-00000 0.00 567.54 0.00 567.54 20041617 101 2104 735 9/1 9/31 101 2104 735 9/1 9/31 188-140480-641400-00000 0.00 184.10 0.00 184.10 20042251 657 5567 436 8/28 9/27 657 5567 436 8/28 9/27 129-156110-634999-33015 0,00 75,61 0.00 75.61 20041629 657 3234 151 8/28 9/27 657 3234 151 8/28 9/27 521-122450-641400-00000 0.00 20.48 0.00 20.48 20041634 261 2382 114 7/25 8/24 261 2382 114 7/25 8/24 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 1,866.90 0.00 1,866.90 20041629 657 2655 649 8/28 9/27 657 2655 649 8/28 9/27 101-163620-641900-00000 0.00 192.78 0.00 192.78 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041634 774 9356 752 7/19 8/18 774 9356 752 7/19 8/18 20041629 101 1611 759 9/1 9/31 101 1611 759 9/1 9/31 20041634 643 8400 400 7/16 8/15 643 8400 400 7/16 8/15 20041629 775 4454 081 8/22 9/21 775 4454 081 8/22 9/21 20041629 867 5435 137 8/28 9/27 867 5435 137 8/28 9/27 20041617 732 8747 603 8/22 9/21 732 8747 603 8/22 9/21 20041629 263 8246 103 9/1 9/31 263 8246 103 9/1 9/31 20042251 695 2226 723 9/4 10/3 695 2226 723 9/4 10/3 20041634 774 9106 107 7/19 8/18 774 9106 107 7/19 8/18 20042251 657 1446 244 8/28 9/27 657 1446 244 8/28 9/27 20041631 774 4803 218 8/19 9/18 774 4803 218 8/19 9/18 20041629 657 6566 069 8/28 9/27 657 6566 069 8/28 9/27 20042251 643 6870 870 8/16 9/15 643 6870 870 8/16 9/15 20041629 774 0225 335 8/19 9/18 774 0225 335 8/19 9/18 20041634 658 0781 466 7/13 8/12 658 0781 466 7/13 8/12 20041623 774 3618 217 8/19 9/18 774 3618 217 8/19 9/18 20041617 732 9405 299 8/22 9/21 732 9405 299 8/22 9/21 201340 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-156110-641400-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 490-144610-641900-00000 0.00 521-122410-641400-00000 0.00 188-140480-641400-00000 0.00 001-156110-641900-00000 0.00 521-122450-641400-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 111-156334-641900-00000 0.00 111-156349-641900-00000 0.00 681-410710-641900-00000 0.00 470-173435-641900-00000 0.00 001-155810-641900-00000 0.00 001-010510-641210-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 681-421510-641900-00000 0.00 188-140480-641400-00000 0.00 AMT NET 33.89 160.00 2,305.16 36.81 99,93 26.93 85.74 23.11 33.89 87.00 220.18 28.90 120.05 31.40 40.94 34.26 30.92 62,90 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 172 VCHR NET 33.89 160.00 2,305.16 36.81 99.93 26.93 85.74 23.11 33.89 307.18 28.90 120.05 31.40 40.94 34.26 30.92 62.90 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041623 093 2800 130 8/16 9/15 093 2800 130 8/16 9/15 20041629 261 2590 318 8/25 9/24 261 2590 318 8/25 9/24 20041634 261 2382 279 5/25 6/24 261 2382 279 5/25 6/24 20041634 334 6249 326 7/4 8/3 334 6249 326 7/4 8/3 20041634 732 3168 316 7/22 8/21 732 3168 316 7/22 8/21 20042334 239-774-7960-025 239-774-7960-025 20042251 695 4331 144 9/4 10/3 695 4331 144 9/4 10/3 20041630 101 1087 919 8/1 8/31 101 1087 919 8/1 8/31 20041634 643 6575 575 7/16 8/15 643 6575 575 7/16 8/15 20042251 498 0880 194 9/4 10/3 498 0880 194 9/4 10/3 20041630 101 1087 919 7/1 7/31 101 1087 919 7/1 7/31 20041630 092 4177 894 7/16 8/15 092 4177 894 7/16 8/15 20041617 101 1371 919 9/1 9/31 101 1371 919 9/1 9/31 20041624 092 4237 364 8/16 9/15 092 4237 364 8/16 9/15 20041634 732 2700 159 7/22 8/21 732 2700 159 7/22 8/21 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681-421510-641900-00000 0.00 101-163612-641400-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 101-163609-641900-00000 0.00 313-163611-641900-00000 0.00 101-163612-641900-00000 0.00 101-163610-641900-00000 0.00 001-172910-641900-00000 0.00 001-172970-641900-00000 0.00 470-173443-641900-00000 0.00 001-121143-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-156363-641900-00000 0.00 001-121143-641900-00000 0.00 001-121143-641900-00000 0.00 408-233352-641100-00000 0.00 495-192370-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 815.25 0.00 PAGE 173 VCHR NET 815.25 31.45 0.00 31.45 932.29 0.00 932.29 912.01 0.00 912.01 42.47 0.00 42.47 60.05 60.05 60.05 60.05 30.03 30.02 0.00 300.25 45.79 0.00 45.79 298.25 0.00 298.25 1.769.26 0.00 1.769.26 215.00 0,00 215.00 802.79 0.00 802.79 88.00 0.00 88.00 465.00 0.00 465.00 298.25 0.00 298.25 35.00 0.00 35.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042249 657 9795 657 9795 20041634 657 3232 657 3232 20041623 775 5538 775 5538 20041617 092 2087 092 2087 20041617 101 1824 101 1824 20041634 774 7686 774 7686 20042251 513 9264 513 9264 20041630 093 2466 093 2466 20041634 213 5800 213 5800 20041629 659 9172 659 9172 20041610 092 4316 DESCRIPTION 548 8/28 9/27 548 8/28 9/27 716 7/28 8/27 716 7/28 8/27 558 8/22 9/21 558 8/22 9/21 866 8/16 9/15 866 8/16 9/15 383 9/1 9/31 383 9/1 9/31 686 7/19 8/18 686 7/19 8/18 452 9/4 10/3 452 9/4 10/3 572 7/16 8/15 572 7/16 8/15 861 7/1 7/31 861 7/1 7/31 725 8/25 9/24 725 8/25 9/24 305 8/16 9/15 092 4316 305 20041617 101 1680 085 101 1680 085 20042324 657 1448 244 657 1448 244 20042251 498 4726 837 498 4726 837 20041629 8/16 9/15 203509 9/1 9/31 9/1 9/31 7/26 7/26 9/4 10/3 9/4 10/3 657 3002 1010 8/28 9/27 657 3002 1010 8/28 9/27 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 495-192330-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 681-421510-641900-00000 0.00 441-256110-641100-00000 0.00 408-253212-641100-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-156363-641900-00000 0.00 001-121143-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 408-210151-641100-00000 0.00 408-253212-641100-00000 0.00 408-233352-641100-00000 0.00 408-253211-641100-00000 0.00 408-253221-641100-00000 0.00 408-233312-641100-00000 0.00 408-233352-641100-00000 0.00 111-156334-641900-00000 0.00 111-156349-641900-00000 0.00 001-156363-641900-00000 0.00 001-155410-641900-00000 0.00 001-155410-641200-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 56.52 0.00 1 PAGE 174 VCHR NET 56.52 28.87 0.00 28.87 34,29 0.00 34.29 171.05 0.00 171.05 140.00 0.00 140.00 23.15 0.00 23.15 65.08 0.00 65.08 205.00 0.00 205.00 882.73 0.00 882.73 62.90 0.00 62.90 184.10 184.10 368.45 368.45 409.55 0,00 1.514.65 140.00 0.00 140.00 98.00 246.34 0.00 344.34 99.90 0.00 99.90 38.52 13.27 0.00 51.79 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042251 642 0818 064 9/4 10/3 642 0818 064 9/4 10/3 20041634 774 8999 001 7/19 8/18 774 8999 001 7/19 8/18 20041629 101 1549 760 9/1 9/31 101 1549 760 9/1 9/31 20041634 774 8049 140 7/19 8/18 774 8049 140 7/19 8/18 20041634 658 7300 233 7/13 8/12 658 7300 233 7/13 8/12 20041629 101 0486 976 9/1 9/31 101 0486 976 9/1 9/31 20041617 101 2152 615 9/1 9/31 101 2152 615 9/1 9/31 20041617 101 1724 306 9/1 9/31 101 1724 306 9/1 9/31 20041623 657 6608 321 8/28 9/27 657 6608 321 8/28 9/27 20041634 775 6687 010 7/22 8/21 775 6687 010 7/22 8/21 20041617 101 1739 184 9/1 9/31 101 1739 184 9/1 9/31 20041617 593 0336 468 9/4 10/3 593 0336 468 9/4 10/3 20041617 389 2650 604 8/22 9/21 389 2650 604 8/22 9/21 20041629 101 1609 763 9/1 9/31 101 1609 763 9/1 9/31 20041629 101 1612 761 9/1 9/31 101 1612 761 9/1 9/31 20041634 774 9207 207 7/19 8/18 774 9207 207 7/19 8/18 20041624 092 1460 172 9/16 9/15 092 1460 172 9/16 9/15 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156363-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 408-253212-641100-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 001-156110-641400-00000 0.00 001-155410-641900-00000 0.00 408-253221-641100-00000 0.00 681-421510-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 408-253221-641100-00000 0.00 408-233313-641100-00000 0.00 188-140480-641400-00000 0.00 001-156110-641400-00000 0.00 001-156110-641400-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 495-192370-641900-00000 0.00 AMT NET 54.48 6,615.42 140.00 1,642.07 544.08 134.30 215.00 147.40 79.53 33.91 160.00 120.37 29.10 140.00 140.00 48.29 190.90 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 175 VCHR NET 54.48 6,615.42 140.00 1,642.07 544.08 134.30 215.00 147.40 79.53 33.91 160.00 120.37 29.10 140.00 140.00 48.29 190.90 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041634 20042251 20042333 20041630 20041634 20042249 20041623 20041623 20041617 20041634 20041617 20042248 20042251 20041632 20042251 20041629 DESCRIPTION 657 8228 320 7/28 8/27 657 8228 320 7/28 8/27 642 6652 151 9/4 10/3 642 6652 151 9/4 10/3 239-334-1040-979 239-334-1040-979 092 4177 894 8/16 9/15 092 4177 894 8/16 9/15 657 1035 739 7/28 8/27 657 1035 739 7/28 8/27 657 9003 434 8/28 9/27 657 9003 434 8/28 9/27 092 1528 163 8/16 9/15 092 1528 163 8/16 9/15 793 1314 154 8/13 9/12 793 1314 154 8/13 9/12 657 3391 060 8/28 9/27 657 3391 060 8/28 9/27 530 5300 097 7/16 8/15 530 5300 097 7/16 8/15 732 8680 600 8/22 9/21 732 8680 600 8/22 9/21 695 2778 742 9/4 10/3 695 2778 742 9/4 10/3 695 0008 900 9/4 10/3 695 0008 900 9/4 10/3 657 8336 098 7/28 8/27 657 8336 098 7/28 8/27 261 2382 239 8/25 9/24 261 2382 239 8/25 9/24 774 5653 109 8/19 9/18 774 5653 109 8/19 9/18 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 521-122450-641400-00000 0.00 001-443010-641900-00000 0.00 001-121143-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 495-192330-641900-00000 0,00 681-421510-641900-00000 0.00 681-421510-641900-00000 0.00 113-138936-641900-00000 0.00 001-000000-202800-00000 0.00 188-140480-641400-00000 0.00 495-192350-641900-00000 0.00 198-157430-641900-00000 0.00 681-431310-641900-00000 0.00 001-157110-641900-00000 0.00 001-155810-641900-00000 0.00 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 55.37 0.00 PAGE 176 VCHR NET 55.37 23.11 0.00 23.11 498.45 0.00 498.45 465.00 0.00 465.00 82.19 0.00 82.19 218.05 0.00 218.05 184,55 O, O0 184.55 63.37 0,00 63,37 135.06 0.00 135.06 2.082.82 0.00 2,082.82 97.19 0.00 97.19 340.90 0.00 340.90 156.22 0.00 156.22 196.62 0.00 196.62 201.00 0.00 201.00 33,28 0.00 33.28 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 32,713.78 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20042250 DESCRIPTION 589865 VENDOR 278050 - SPRINT C090402194/24379200 9/4 C090402194/24379200 9/4 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109-182601-641400-00000 0,00 109-182900-641400-00000 0,00 778-182700-641400-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041621 20041620 20041618 20041619 590054 VENDOR 349940 - SPRINT 101 2218 703 9/1 9/31 101 2218 703 9/1 9/31 204763 597 1737 078 8/7 9/6 597 1737 078 8/7 9/6 204764 455 7891 010 8/10 9/9 455 7891 010 8/10 9/9 774 7960 032 8/19 9/18 774 7960 032 8/19 9/18 130-157710-641900-00000 0.00 111-156380-641900-00000 0.00 111-156390-641900-00000 0.00 111-156381-641900-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041622 20041601 589997 VENDOR 338370 - SPRINT YELLOW PAGES 300184358 9/2 470-173463-648160-00000 300184358 9/2 202830 206811078 8/04 113-138900-634999-00000 206811078 8/01 202901 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 20041609 589553 VENDOR 16420 - ST FRANCIS ANIMAL CLINIC G DAVIS 02 10537 610-155410-631970-00000 G DAVIS 02 10537 201067 50.00 50.00 45.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041607 20041608 589613 VENDOR 120640 - ST. FRANCIS II ANIMAL CLINIC T OESTERREICHER 02 10577 610-155410-631970-00000 T OESTERREICHER 02 10577 201073 E SINGER 02 10611 610-155410-631970-00000 E SINGER 02 10611 201073 PAGE VCHR NET 145.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 145.00 109.00 0.00 109.00 109.00 0.00 109.00 109.00 0.00 109.00 109.00 0.00 109.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 436.00 0.00 47.41 0.00 47.41 0.00 44.00 0.00 44.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 91.41 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 15,00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041608 DESCRIPTION J ALVARADO 02 10609 J ALVAP~qDO 02 10609 201073 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 610-155410-631970-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041928 20041928 589557 VENDOR 17540 - STATE OF FLORIDA H MIGUEL 02 6955 MMA 681-431590-635700-00000 H MIGUEL 02 6955 MMA R ALVAP, ADO 02 7566 R ALVARADO 02 7566 MM 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 15.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042088 PAGE 178 VCHR NET 15.00 CHECK NO 20042086 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 0.00 17.00 0.00 17.00 13.00 0.00 13.00 CHECK NO 20041779 681-431590-635700-00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 20041945 589921 VENDOR 306810 - STEPHEN WHITTIER 8/26-29 TRVL S.WHI1-FIER 111-156341-640300-00000 8/26-29 TRVL S.WHITTIER 0.00 CHECK NO 303745 589715 VENDOR 185740 - STEVE PEFFERS 8/26-29 TRVL S.PEFFERS 8/26-29 TRVL S.PEFFERS 111-156341-640300-00000 30.00 589906 VENDOR 297180 - STEVEN L CASE M.D. P.A. D DIPASCALE 8/20/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160135 D DIPASCALE 8/20/02 590100 VENDOR 361010 - STORAGE ON WHEELS 9/3 40'CONTAINERS/DELIVER 101-163624-763100-00000 207046 9/3 40' CONTAINERS/DELIVER 0.00 69.00 0.00 69.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 69.00 0.00 69.00 0.00 69.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 69.00 0.00 97.50 0.00 97.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 97.50 0.00 5,550.00 0.00 590164 VENDOR 900030 - STU SENNEFF 9/12 TRVL STU SENNEFF 9/12 TRVL STU SENNEFF 001-122255-640300-00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,550.00 5,550.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 105.89 0.00 105.89 0.00 105.89 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 303702 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 590199 VENDOR 900050 - SUMMERS FIRE SPRINKLERS INC REF 357039 SUMMERS FIRE 113-000000-115420-00000 SUMMERS FIRE SPRKLR REF 357039 AMT DISC 16J I CHECK NO 20042245 589436 VENDOR 124220 - SUMMERWIND APARTMENTS M CASTILLO 9/02 RENT 001-155930-634153-00000 AND AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 20041800 589760 VENDOR 220080 - SUMMIT TPJ~INING SOURCE, INC. RG0321940 159752 SAFETY I~NDBOOKS 518-121630-652990-00000 518-121630-641950-00000 PAGE 179 CHECK NO 20041561 589635 VENDOR 136600 - SUN BELT MEDICAL/EMERGI-SOURCE 103047 SUN BELT MEDICAL/EMERGI-SOURCE 490-144610-652720-00000 490-144610-652710-00000 VCHR NET CHECK NO 20042336 589459 09102 AND VENDOR 262150 - SUN LIFE OF CANADA 517-121640-645910-00000 0.00 63.40 0.00 63.40 CHECK NO 20042228 589457 VENDOR 262150 - SUN LIFE OF CANADA 9/02 CONVERSION 517-121640-645910-00000 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 63.40 CHECK NO 20042335 589458 VENDOR 262150 - SUN LIFE OF CANADA 09/02 PREMIUMS 517-121640-645930-00000 AND 0.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 450.00 0.00 336.00 0.00 11.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 347.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 347.00 430.00 1,956.44 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 65,603.04 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,443.75 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,461.99 0.00 2,386.44 2.386.44 65,603.04 65,603.04 1,443.75 1,443.75 24,461.99 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 24,461.99 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 589456 VENDOR 262150 - SUN LIFE OF CANADA 20042227 9/02 SHORT TERM 517-121670-645170-00000 0.00 AND CHECK NO 20040072 590068 VENDOR 354490 - SUNBELT PRINTING 18969 001-013010-647110-00000 TRIM INSERT 20040072 18779 001-013010-647110-00000 0.00 TRIM NOTICE 0.00 CHECK NO 20041536 590107 VENDOR 361960 - SUNCOAST PEST CONTROL 2308 191-138785-884200-33752 #48790240008 WEEKS 159284 16J 1 CHECK NO 20041263 20041591 20042242 20041587 20041587 20041593 20041260 20041587 589561 VENDOR 483727 206048 SUPPLIES 382802 206272 SUPPLIES 104377 154834 TITANIUM BIT 383005 206435 SUPPLIES 383014 206435 SUPPLIES 382016 206048 SUPPLIES 484327 206050 SUPPLIES 382469 206435 SUPPLIES 17660 - SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 408-210130-652990-00000 111-156313-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 408-210130-652990-00000 408-233351-652910-00000 001-122240-652990-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 4,188.80 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,405.00 0.00 3,704.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 180 VCHR NET 4,188.80 4,188.80 4,405.00 3,704.50 8,109.50 0.00 825.00 0.00 825.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 825.00 0.00 668.74 0.00 668.74 0.00 172.25 0.00 172.25 0.00 14.27 0.00 14.27 0.00 15.16 0.00 15.16 0.00 9.87 0.00 9.87 0.00 32.61 0.00 32.61 0.00 31.90 0.00 31.90 0.00 3.51 0.00 3.51 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041587 382648 206435 SUPPLIES 20041588 103356 206405 SUPPLIES 20041263 483575 206048 SUPPLIES 20041260 382715 206050 SUPPLIES 20041263 483888 206048 SUPPLIES 20041587 103086 206435 SUPPLIES 20039616 381879 206048 SUPPLIES 20041592 380003 206229 SUPPLIES 20041590 382679 206273 SUPPLIES 20041586 395502 206473 SUPPLIES 20041262 483700 206047 SUPPLIES 20041587 382680 206435 SUPPLIES 20042212 383210 206273 SUPP. 20041262 484197 206047 SUPPLIES 20041587 382981 206435 SUPPLIES 20041592 382313 206229 SUPPLIES 20041587 381996 206435 SUPPLIES DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 109-182901-652990-00000 0.00 408-210130-652990-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 408-210130-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 408-210130-652990-00000 0,00 111-156395-652990-00000 0.00 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 001-172930-652990-00000 0.00 408-233312-652910-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 111-156313-652910-00000 0.00 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 408-233312-652910-00000 0,00 001-122240-652990-00000 0,00 111-156395-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 16J AMT NET VCHR DISC 26.96 0.00 1 PAGE 181 VCHR NET 26.96 26.24 0.00 26.24 13.50 0.00 13.50 12.59 0.00 12.59 180.71 0.00 180.71 6.78 0.00 6.78 239.50 0.00 239.50 145.11 0.00 145.11 32.72 0,00 32.72 87.93 0.00 87.93 71.10 0.00 71.10 6.84 0.00 0.00 16.66 0.00 6.84 16.66 28.48 0.00 28.48 133.33 0.00 133.33 10.86 0.00 10.86 16.87 0.00 16.87 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20039614 381962 206229 SUPPLIES 20041263 484037 206048 SUPPLIES 20041586 395532 206473 SUPPLIES 20041593 484859 206048 SUPPLIES 20041587 102873 206435 SUPPLIES 20041592 380755 206229 SUPPLIES 20041587 102998 206435 SUPPLIES 20041586 381226 206473 SUPPLIES 20041590 381993 206273 SUPPLIES 20041263 483625 206048 SUPPLIES 20041590 382797 206273 SUPPLIES 20041260 484354 206050 SUPPLIES 20041260 484353 206050 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156395-652910-00000 0.00 111-156395-652990-00000 0.00 408-210130-652990-00000 0.00 001-172930-652990-00000 0,00 408-210130-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 111-156395-652990-00000 0.00 001-122240-652990-00000 0.00 001-172930-652990-00000 0.00 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 408-210130-652990-00000 0.00 111-156313-652990-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 408-233351-652910-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589737 VENDOR 200380 - SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 20041594 382699 408-253212-652990-00000 205971 SUPPLIES 20041596 382280 408-253211-652990-00000 205930 SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 8.09 25.91 31.02 16.44 624.00 7.88 56.74 5.54 23.14 12.54 39.87 19.72 28.61 19.49- CHECK TOTAL 18.78 63.38 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 34.00 31.02 16.44 624.00 182 7.88 56.74 5.54 23.14 12.54 39.87 19.72 28.61 19.49- 63.38 18.78 2,884.50 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041589 DESCRIPTION 382276 206398 SUPPILES 20041595 382541 205944 20041261 382216 205930 20041596 382769 205930 20041596 382448 205930 20041595 382655 205944 20040979 382328 205944 20041261 382011 205930 20041596 382841 205930 20041245 382329 205944 20041595 382459 205944 20041261 381994 205930 20041589 381899 206398 20041594 382309 205971 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CREDIT FOR OVER PAY SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPILES SUPPLIES CHECK NO 20041580 20041577 590057 VENDOR 350870 - SUNTEC PAINT 208004 206760 SUPPLIES 208003 206759 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163630-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652990-00000 0.00 101-163630-652990-00000 0.00 408-253212-652990-00000 0.00 111-156334-646313-00000 0.00 111-156332-646313-00000 0.00 AMT NET 44.96 6.96 8.61 9,17 2.51 24.06 35.96- 71.98 55.89 30.56 9.44 5.84 294.81 19.34 CHECK TOTAL 792.00 792.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 44.96 6.96 8.61 9.17 2.51 24.06 35.96- 71.98 55.89 30.56 9.44 5.84 294.81 19.34 630.33 792.00 792.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041577 208008 206759 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156332-646313-00000 0,00 CHECK NO 589814 20041579 843066 204713 PARTS 20041579 828796 204713 PARTS 20041578 855675 204713 SUPPLIES 20041579 841697 204713 PARTS 20041579 823502 204713 PARTS 20041579 844843 204713 PARTS VENDOR 257340 - SUPER PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042246 589658 VENDOR 156260 - SURETY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 020831-15 001-122240-646110-00000 206719 INSTALL SOFFIT VENT 0.00 CHECK NO 303723 590165 VENDOR 900030 - SUSAN PECK 7/9 TRVL SUSAN PECK 7/9 TRVL SUSAN PECK 001-156110-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042166 589991 VENDOR 335100 - SUSAN PETR 2/6 & 12 TRVL S.PETR 2/6 & 12 TRVL S.PETR 001-156110-640300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589851 VENDOR 273600 - SWANA AMT NET 792.00 CHECK TOTAL 96.22- 29.78- 177.96 96.22 29.78 62.62 CHECK TOTAL 4,379. O0 CHECK TOTAL 29.20 CHECK TOTAL 12.00 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 792. O0 2,376.00 96.22- 29.78- 177.96 96.22 29.78 62.62 184 240.58 12.00 12.00 29.20 29.20 4,379.00 4,379.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041799 DUS- G YILMAZ 158840 DUES- G YILHAZ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 470-173410-654210-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041552 589619 VENDOR 126470 - SW~,RTZ ASSOCIATES 2679 001-156363-646315-00000 206332 SUPPLIES 0.00 CHECK NO 20041585 20041585 20041585 20041585 20041585 20041585 20041584 20041584 20041584 20041585 20041584 20041584 590029 293383 202173 OIL CFL~NGE 185986 202173 OIL CHANGE 293470 202173 OIL CHANGE 294062 202173 OIL CHANGE 294533 202173 OIL CHANGE 293526 202173 OIL CHANGE 186035 202173 OIL CHANG 186939 202173 OIL CHANG 185985 202173 OIL C~ANG 186611 202173 OIL CHANGE 185929 202173 OIL CHANG 185991 202173 OIL CHANG VENDOR 345700 - SWIFT OIL CHANGE INC 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 123.00 CHECK TOTAL 4,323.90 CHECK TOTAL 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 163 VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 185 VCHR NET 123.00 123.00 4,323.90 4,323.90 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041584 186012 202173 20041585 186764 202173 20041584 186918 202173 20041585 293655 202173 20041584 185962 202173 20041585 294110 202173 20041584 186971 202173 20041584 186030 202173 20041585 186780 202173 20041585 186170 202173 20041585 293562 202173 20041585 186236 202173 20041584 186010 202173 20041584 294750 202173 20041585 186692 202173 20041584 186956 202173 DESCRIPTION OIL CHANG OIL CHANGE OIL CHANG OIL CHANGE OIL CHANG OIL CHANGE OIL CHANG OIL CHANG OIL CHANGE OIL CHANGE OIL CHANGE OIL CHANGE OIL CHANG OIL CHANG OIL CHANGE OIL CHANG COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 AMT NET 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22,00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 22.00 186 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22,00 22.00 22.00 22,00 20041584 186049 202173 OIL CHANG SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 16J 1 PAGE VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20041585 186166 202173 OIL CHANGE 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 22.00 0.00 22.00 20041584 186046 202173 OIL CHANG 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 22.00 0.00 22.00 20041584 186021 202173 OIL CHANG 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 22.00 0.00 22.00 20041585 294066 202173 OIL CHANGE 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 22.00 0.00 22.00 20041585 196311 202173 OIL CHANGE 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 22.00 0,00 22.00 20041584 185911 202173 OIL CHANG 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 22.00 0.00 22.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 770.00 CHECK NO 589566 VENDOR 18690 - T-SHIRT EXPRESS 20041563 5678 202048 T-SHIRTS 111-156390-652110-00000 0.00 81.60 0.00 81.60 20041769 5670 159905 T SHIRTS 111-156343-652110-00000 0.00 212.40 0.00 212.40 20041560 5690 207138 PROMOTIONAL PROD 111-156341-648170-00000 111-156313-648170-00000 0.00 380.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 380.30 20041560 5691 207138 PROMOTIONAL PROD 111-156341-648170-00000 111-156313-648170-00000 0.00 675.00 0.00 74.30 0.00 749.30 20041560 5689 207138 PROMOTIONAL PROD 111-156341-648170-00000 111-156313-648170-00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 70.30 0.00 470.30 20041795 5514 157926 POM-POMS 111-156341-652990-00000 0.00 808.60 0.00 808.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,702.50 CHECK NO 589563 VENDOR 18020 - TAMIAMI FORD INC 20041923 99648 203103 PARTS 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 3.02 0.00 3.02 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041925 DESCRIPTION 99299 201657 PARE KEYS FOR VEHICLES 20041923 99162 203103 PARTS 20041923 99620 203103 PARTS 20041924 CM99647'2 203103 PARTS 20038972 FOCS63071 203105 PARTS 20041923 99798 203103 PARTS 20041923 99645 203103 PARTS 20041924 99647-1 203103 PARTS 20041923 99566 203103 PARTS 20041925 FOCS63975 201657 PARE KEYS FOR VEHICLES 20041923 99647 203103 PARTS 20041921 F0CS65021 203105 PARTS 20041924 CM99645 203103 PARTS 20041923 99698 203103 PARTS 20041923 CM996471 203103 PARTS 20041938 36034 206958 2002 FORD TAURUS 20041923 99672 203103 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101-163630-634999-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 101-163630-634999-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 522-122464-764110-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 AMT NET 15.95 12.90 128.00 140.64- 103.43 15.95 113.14 307.30 13.89 80.85 13.98 100.00 23.58- 37.22 11.65- 15,843.32 6.30 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 15.95 12.90 128.00 140.64- 103.43 15.95 113.14 307.30 13.89 80.85 13.98 100.00 23.58- 37.22 11.65- 6.30 15,843.32 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20041921 FOCB6467 203105 PARTS 20041924 99621 203103 PARTS 20041923 99726 203103 PARTS 20041924 99870 203103 PARTS 20041923 99409 203103 PARTS 20041923 99670 203103 PARTS DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521-122410-646415-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 521-122410-646425-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042314 590095 VENDOR 360670 - TAMMY DAVID KICKBOXING 9/6-29/02 206443 KICKBOXING 9/6-29/02 111-156313-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589843 VENDOR 272270 - TAMPA BAY ENGINEERING, INC. 20042206 88453 107399 3/8-8/1/02 414-263611-631400-70127 412-273511-631400-70127 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041559 589612 VENDOR 117110 - TAMPA BAY TRANE SERVICE 313593 201257 HVAC MAINT 20041942 314621 201257 HVAC MAINT 20041558 314609 201257 HVAC MAINT 20041559 314613 201257 HVAC MAINT 20041558 313815 201257 HVAC MAINT 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 359.50 231.84 8.64 23.54 46.40 150.26 CHECK TOTAL 175.00 CHECK TOTAL 194.16 194.16 CHECK TOTAL 3,527.50- 7,881.60 6,375. O0 2,592.50 4,188.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 189 VCHR NET 359.50 231.84 8.64 23.54 46.40 150.26 17,439.56 175.00 175.00 388.32 388.32 3,527.50- 7,881.60 6,375.00 2,592.50 4,188.00 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042243 431363 154833 COMPRESSOR 3692 20041558 313593 201257 HVAC MAINT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 2O041564 589781 VENDOR 238410 - TANNER INDUSTRIES 86870 408-253221-652310-00000 202573 AMMONIA 0.00 CHECK NO 303737 590166 VENDOR 900030 - TANYA W. SALDIVAR 6/25-9/12 TRVL T.SALDIVAR 001-156150-640200-00000 6/25-9/12 TRVL TANYA SALDIVAR 0.00 CHECK NO 20041565 589916 VENDOR 304690 - TAPS AUTOMOTIVE 20622 521-122410-646415-00000 202166 PARTS 0.00 CHECK NO 20041567 20041566 20041567 589564 VENDOR 18040 - TAYLOR RENTAL 1-226226-04 201532 RENTAL EQUIPM. 1-228026-01 201532 RENTAL EQUIPM. 1-226456-02 201532 RENTAL EQUIPM. 001-122240-644600-00000 001-122240-644600-00000 001-122240-644600-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041556 589734 VENDOR 199520 - TECH OF COLLIER COUNTY 024685996 7/02 111-156332-634999-00000 201195 LANDSCAPE MAINT SVS 0.00 CHECK NO 590071 VENDOR 355620 - TECHNOLOGIA, INC. AMT NET 695.60 7,650.00- CHECK TOTAL 768.06 CHECK TOTAL 179.42 CHECK TOTAL 22.95 CHECK TOTAL 270.23 212.84 140.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,560.00 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 190 VCHR NET 695.60 7,650.00- 10.555.20 768.06 768.06 179.42 179.42 22.95 22.95 270.23 212.84 140.00 623.07 1,560.00 1,560.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20040535 20042065 DESCRIPTION BCC 08222 159164 RACK AND SETUP FOR DUBBING EQ BCC8232 206430 RACK UNIT FOR SOUND SYSTEM COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-100130-652910-00000 0.00 001-100130-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 590051 VENDOR 349710 - TELOG 20040513 S 2682 158003 REPAIRED PRESSURE RECORDER 408-253212-646510-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589903 VENDOR 295310 - THE CENTURIAN GROUP, INC 20041724 2050 101-163620-652990-00000 206969 FUEL 0.00 CHECK NO 20041292 20041292 589911 VENDOR 301350 - THE NAPLES STUDIO 3204 001-100130-634999-00000 200834 COUNTY HIGHLIGHTS 3205 001-100130-634999-00000 200834 COUNTY HIGHLIGHTS 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041312 20041855 20041286 20041854 20041308 20041311 589552 VENDOR 14880 - THE PHOTO LAB 82451 ANIMAL CONTROL 159859 FILM 82661 ANIMAL CONTROL 160183 FILM PROC 82434 WASTEWATER 200720 FILM 82192 UNIV EXT 159961 SLIDE DEV 82445 ANIMAL CONTROL 159863 FILM PROCESSING 82357 ANIMAL CONTROL 159861 FILM 001-155410-647210-00000 001-155410-647210-00000 408-210130-647210-00000 001-157110-647210-00000 001-155410-647210-00000 001-155410-647210-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 883.61 7,971.23 CHECK TOTAL 215.97 CHECK TOTAL 1,142.00 CHECK TOTAL 210.00 281.00 CHECK TOTAL 30.60 52.90 8.50 7.00 6.40 12.50 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 1 PAGE 191 VCHR NET 883.61 7,971.23 8,854.84 215.97 215.97 1,142.00 1,142.00 210.00 281.00 491.00 30.60 52.90 8.50 7.00 6.40 12.50 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041309 82395 PUBLIC INFO 159687 PRINTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BO~RD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 473-173413-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303392 590172 VENDOR 900040 - THE STP~qND LLC Sll~AND 04729919300 408-000000-115001-00000 STRAND 5930 BARCLAY LN 0.00 CHECK NO 20041789 20041557 20041557 589832 40045547-000 160040 VIDEO TAPES 38616179-001 200216 BULK VIDEO TAPES 38616179-001 159777 VIDEO TAPES VENDOR 263500 - THE TAPE COMPANY 001-100130-651910-00000 001-100130-652990-00000 001-100130-652990-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041780 589714 VENDOR 184910 - THOMAS M. FITZPATRICK M.D. T VANWINKLE 8/16/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160136 T VANWINKLE 8/16/02 0.00 CHECK NO 20042204 20042135 20042205 589842 150247 4416 TO 8/9/02 150252 107840 TO 8/9/02 150256 4539 TO 8/9/02 VENDOR 271800 - TILDEN LOBNITZ & COOPER, INC. 414-263611-631400-74039 412-273511-634999-70057 414-263611-631400-73916 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041721 589979 VENDOR 332650 - TIM WILLIAMS. INC. 02-0773 191-138785-884100-33752 R. GARDNER 77262840002 0.00 AMT NET 10.10 CHECK TOTAL 125.49 CHECK TOTAL 126.00 1.200.10 702.20 CHECK TOTAL 171.60 CHECK TOTAL 1,830.00 975.00 250.00 CHECK TOTAL 2.500.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 192 VCHR NET 10.10 128.00 125.49 125.49 126.00 1.200.10 702.20 2.028.30 171.60 171.60 1.830.00 975.00 250.00 3.055.00 2,500.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20041568 590040 VENDOR 347620 - TIME WARNER CABLE 8381480510429646 111-156313-643500-00000 205588 CABLE SVS 16J CHECK NO 20041773 589784 VENDOR 239650 - TOTAL COMMUNICATION CONCEPTS GROUP, 320 129-156110-634999-33015 160043 INSTALL MODEM CHECK NO 20041775 20041569 590061 3222470003 160200 BRAKE PAD 3222390016 204493 PARTS VENDOR 352290 - TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC 521-122410-646425-00000 521-122410-646425-00000 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20041555 589894 VENDOR 290610 - TP~ANE 4675780 206776 REPLACE REC CENTER 301-120435-763100-80162 CHECK NO 20041926 20041927 20041919 20039581 20041796 589565 VENDOR 18490 - TRI-COUNTY BLUEPRINT & SUPPLY 9.001123 201386 BLUEPRINT COPIES 111-156310-651210-00000 7.005342 200788 BLUEPINTS COPIES 408-233351-652990-00000 7.005306 200188 BLUEPRINTS AND COPIES 408-210105-647110-00000 7.005310 157428 SUPPLIES 408-233313-647110-00000 7.005348 159465 BOND 412-273511-651210-70045 413-263611-651210-73076 PAGE 193 VCHR NET 2,500.00 0.00 12.95 0.00 12.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 12.95 0.00 335.00 0.00 335.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 335.00 0.00 280.00 0.00 280.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 140.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 420.00 0.00 2.095.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 7.74 0.00 2.095.00 2,095.00 7.74 0.00 12.75 0.00 12.75 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 52.65 0.00 52.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 0.00 8.25 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041783 7.005414 159762 COPIES 20041927 7.005366 200788 BLUEPINTS COPIES 20041796 7.005335 159465 BOND 20041918 9.001077 201386 BLEWPRINT PRINTING 20041798 7.005405 158320 BOND COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 413-263611-647110-73076 0,00 408-233351-652990-00000 0.00 412-273511-651210-70045 O.O0 413-263611-651210-73076 0.00 111-156310-651210-00000 0,00 111-138313-651110-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589655 VENDOR 153470 - TRIARCO 20041570 267072 205404 ARTS AND CRAFT SUPPLIES 20041570 262205 205404 ARTS AND CRAFT SUPPLIES 130-157710-652990-00000 0.00 130-157710-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589707 20041571 14218676 201256 SUPPLIES 20041571 14218678 201256 SUPPLIES 20041572 14223012 201256 HVAC PARTS 20041571 14193320 201256 SUPPLIES 20041571 14185522 201256 SUPPLIES 20041572 14223010 201256 HVAC PARTS 20041571 14214346 201256 SUPPLIES VENDOR 182050 - TROPIC SUPPLY INC. 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0,00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 AMT NET 2.40 18. O0 59.40 0.00 g.o0 257.46 CHECK TOTAL 7.76 277.01 CHECK TOTAL 1.60 10.60 6.12 37.85 24.75 44.76 9.84 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 2.40 18.00 59.40 9.00 257.46 430.65 7.76 277,01 284.77 1.60 10.60 6,12 37.85 24.75 44.76 9.84 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041571 14193323 201256 SUPPLIES 20041571 14218677 201256 SUPPLIES 20041572 14223011 201256 HVAC PARTS 20041571 14214345 201256 SUPPLIES 20041571 14172597 201256 SUPPLIES 20041571 14214347 201256 SUPPLIES 20041571 14185523 201256 SUPPLIES 20041571 14176698 201256 SUPPLIES 20041571 14214348 201256 SUPPLIES 20041571 14193321 201256 SUPPLIES 20041571 14193322 201256 SUPPLIES 20041571 14214344 201256 SUPPLIES 20042313 14176698 OVER PAY 201256 OVER PAY 14176698 20041571 10 85461 201256 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0,00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 001-122240-652996-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041770 589873 VENDOR 280880 - TROPICOOL GARDENS 8492 001-157110-646320-00000 159820 PLANTS 0.00 AMT NET 140.36 101.62 43.72 41.70 37.20- 98.21 79.11 37.50 23.65 65.32 55.36 31.81 74.40- 155.37- CHECK TOTAL 67.50 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 140.36 101.62 195 43.72 41.70 37.20- 98.21 79.11 37.50 23.65 65.32 55.36 31.81 74.40- 155.37- 586.91 67.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 67.50 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20041554 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 590020VENDOR 343600 - TRUEGREEN LANDSCAPE 1852325860 001-122240-646314-00000 206930 FLUSH CUT PALMS AMT DISC 0.00 CHECK NO 20041771 589868 VENDOR 278670 - TRUGREEN 824601 160016 TREATMENT WORMS ON TREES 001-126334-646314-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041787 20041788 590026 1852367676 158282 AIRPORT RD 1852323592 158283 SVS VENDOR 345310 - TRUGREEN LANDCARE 001-126334-646314-00000 16J 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 20041573 20041940 20041573 589796 29450 206410 THERMOPLASTIC MARKINGS AND RA 29074 206849 ROADWAY PAINT 29449 206410 THERMOPLASTIC MARKINGS AND RA 1,145. O0 O. O0 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 196 VCHR NET CHECK NO 20040517 20040514 20040508 1,145.00 1,145.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 450.00 0.00 830.00 0.00 830.00 990.00 0.00 990.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,820.00 001-126334-646314-00000 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 145.00 VENDOR 253060 - TRUTWIN INDUSTRIES, INC. 313-163673-763100-60173 8,709.08 0.00 8,709.08 794.48 0.00 794.48 101-163630-634999-00000 0.00 313-163673-763100-60173 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,648.56 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 847.90 001-100130-648160-00000 0.00 111-156395-654110-00000 0.00 589634 EMUSEU 8/27 159784 AS IN ECHO FOR EVERGLADES SUBCRRIP ANNUAL GAZZE1-FE 157448 ANNUAL SUBSCRIP GAZETTE CCGOVG 8/27 159766 AUGUST ADS FOR SUMMER BREAK VENDOR 135240 - TUFF PUBLICATIONS. INC 198-157430-648160-00000 710.40 0.00 710.40 25.50 0.00 25.50 0.00 112.00 0.00 112.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER CHECK NO 20042253 20042247 20042247 589672 107545 207197 REPAIR 107331 207064 ENGINE RENTAL 107558 207064 ENGINE RENTAL COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO VENDOR 163320 - TURBOMECA ENGINE CORPORATION 001-144510-646860-00000 AMT DISC 0.00 001-144510-646860-00000 0.00 001-144510-641950-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041243 20041243 20041243 589779 8917555 8/16 200709 CHEMICALS 8917597 8/20 200709 CHEMICALS 8917486 8/7 200709 CHEMICALS VENDOR 237380 - U.S. FILTER/DAVIS PROCESS DIVISION 408-233312-652310-00000 0.00 408-233312-652310-00000 0.00 408-233312-652310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20041733 590150 VENDOR 363680 - UDO M. & EVA M. BECKERMANN CLOSING 313-163673-761100-60018 207239 CLOSING 0.00 CHECK NO 20042185 590044 VENDOR 348410 - UNITED RENTALS 27128032-001 408-253212-644600-00000 157980 BOOM TRUCK 0.00 CHECK NO 303739 590200 VENDOR 900050 - UNITY FAITH MISSIONARY REF.PARKS UNITY FAITH 670-000000-220010-00000 REF.PARKS UNITY FAITH MISS.BAPTIST 0.00 CHECK NO 20042189 589703 VENDOR 179110 - UNIVERSAL MAP 930225 159977 WALL MAP 001-010510-654110-00000 0.00 AMT NET 17,033.01 2,378.76 21.28 CHECK TOTAL 6,476.25 1,650.00 2,310.00 CHECK TOTAL 72,941.22 CHECK TOTAL 75.36 CHECK TOTAL 200.00 CHECK TOTAL 225.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 197 VCHR NET 17,033.01 2,378.76 21.28 19,433.05 6,476.25 1,650.00 2,310.00 10,436.25 72,941.22 72,941.22 75.36 75.36 200.00 200.00 225.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20042293 589767 VENDOR 228260 - UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIST-D.BILAN/RETAKE EX 473-173413-654360-00000 159514 - REGIST-D.BILAN 0.00 CHECK NO 303740 590201 VENDOR 900050 - US HOME/LEE COLLIER REF.USHOME 356651 113-000000-115420-00000 REF.USHOME/LEE COLLIER 3840 SAWGRASS 0.00 CHECK NO 20042184 589993 VENDOR 335860 - USA BLUE BOOK 577612 159100 PARTS 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042183 590122 VENDOR 362910 - VENTURE PUBLISHING, INC. 00222590 111-156425-654110-00000 157935 BOOKS 0.00 CHECK NO 589933 VENDOR 314680 - VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES 20042216 A2003669CI 9/1-9/30 201138 A2003669CI 9/1-9/30 408-233351-641150-00000 408-233312-641150-00000 408-233352-641150-00000 408-233313-641150-00000 408-233350-641150-00000 408-210130-641150-00000 20042139 A2102151CI 201718 SVS 111-156343-641150-00000 111-156349-641150-00000 111-156380-641150-00000 20042190 A2102051CI 9/1-9/30 159986 PAGING SVS 001-155410-641150-00000 20042284 A2-118449 9/02 A2-118449 9/02 200412 001-178985-641150-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 AMT NET CHECK TOTAL 70.00 CHECK TOTAL 11,743.24 CHECK TOTAL 652.88 CHECK TOTAL 43.40 CHECK TOTAL 207. O0 2.24- 9,09 8,74 0.00 38.59 10.90 28.85 2.95 72.60 19.87 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE lgB VCHR NET 225.00 70.00 70.00 11,743.24 11,743.24 652.88 652.88 43.40 43.40 261.18 42.70 72.60 19.87 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042285 A2-014704 9/02 A2-014704 9/02 202272 20042138 A2102151CI 201717 SVS 20042283 A2-119934 9/02 A2-119934 9/02 202268 20042171 A2106885CI 200935 9/1 SERVICE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 495-192350-641150-00000 0.00 111-156310-641150-00000 0.00 111-156313-641150-00000 0.00 111-156341-641150-00000 0.00 111-156425-641150-00000 0.00 119-156342-641150-00000 0,00 495-192370-641150-00000 0.00 521-122410-641150-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 303690 590202 VENDOR 900050 - VERONICA CHAVEZ REF.PKS. VERONICA CHAVEZ 111-156395-347990-00000 REF.PARKS VERONICA CHAVEZ 0.00 CHECK NO 20042194 589567 VENDOR 19260 - VICS SHOE REPAIR 9060000506 113-138915-652140-00000 159573 SHOES T.STICK 0.00 CHECK NO 303691 590203 VENDOR 900050 - VICTORIA BOCK REF,PKS.VICTORIA BOCK REF,PARKS VICTORIA BOCK 111-156390-347990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042145 590000 VENDOR 338880 - VIRGINIA LAVUNDI 404996 129-156110-652650-33774 160177 YOGA CD'S 0.00 CHECK NO 589466 VENDOR 350960 - VISION SERVICE PLAN-(IC) 20042034 9/02 VISION PREMIUM 517-121640-645910-00000 AND 0.00 AMT NET 8.54 11.80 5.90 40,40 2.95 1.00 25.61 28.81 CHECK TOTAL 120.00 CHECK TOTAL 135.15 CHECK TOTAL 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 120.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,747.03 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 199 VCHR NET 8.54 62.05 25.61 28.81 521.36 120.00 120.00 135.15 135.15 25.00 25.00 120.00 120.00 2,747.03 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 16J i PAGE 200 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 VCHR NET 2,747,03 CHECK NO 589989 VENDOR 334620 - VOPAK USA INC 20042146 TA-638373 159112 MINEP~AL OIL 408-233351-652310-00000 0.00 561.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 561,00 561.00 CHECK NO 589717 20042180 11634140 206067 CHEM. 20042179 11527785 206066 CHEM. 20042181 11852056 206068 CHEM. 20042179 11768527 206066 CHEM. 20042181 11852058 206068 CHEM. 20042179 11906445 206066 CHEM. 20042181 11842190 206068 CHEM. 20042181 11608154 206068 CHEM. VENDOR 185990 - VWR SCIENTIFIC 408-253221-652310-00000 0.00 408-253250-652910-00000 0.00 408-253211-652310-00000 0.00 408-253250-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652310-00000 0.00 408-253250-652310-00000 0.00 408-253211-652310-00000 0.00 408-253211-652310-00000 0.00 115.20 502.60 31.68 419.20 48.96 38.27 63.36 95.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 115.20 502,60 31.68 419.20 48.96 38.27 63.36 95.04 20042178 11615857 205996 CHEM. 20042181 11628657 206068 CHEM. 408-233350-652310-00000 0.00 408-233350-652990-00000 0.00 408-253211-652310-00000 0.00 127.68 0.00 91.08 0.00 0.00 127.68 91.08 20042180 11906885 206067 CHEM. 408-253221-652310-00000 0.00 19.13 0.00 19.13 20042179 11568456 206066 CHEM. 20042180 11619343 206067 CHEM. 408-253250-652310-00000 0.00 408-253221-652990-00000 0.00 13.38 10.94 0.00 0.00 13.38 10.94 SEPTEMBER 18. 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER 20042181 11541197 206068 CHEM. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17. 2002 20042179 11767770 206066 CHEM. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408-253211-652310-00000 0.00 408-253250-652310-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042123 20042123 589568 VENDOR 19440 - WAL-MART PHARMACY INV 6/16/02-6/30/02 001-155930-652710-00000 201913 PRESCRIPTION INV 6/1/02-6/15/02 001-155930-652710-00000 201913 PRESCRIPTION 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 589994 VENDOR 335990 - WALGREEN COMPANY 20042195 8/1-8/14/02 001-155930-652710-00000 159974 PRESC.DRUGS 0.00 CHECK NO 590142 VENDOR 363600 - WARREN VITALE 20041743 CLOSING 207226 CLOSING 338-163650-761100-60018 0.00 CHECK NO 589591 VENDOR 109110 20041244 1503271/0194044 9/02 1503271/0194044 9/02 20041244 1488426/0194004 9/02 1488426/0194004 9/02 20041244 8656840/0194051 9/02 8656840/0194051 9/02 20041244 1494949/0194043 9/02 1494949/0194043 9/02 20041244 1507838 0194418 9/02 20041244 1484692/0194033 9/02 1484692/0194033 9/02 · WASTE MGMT OF COLLIER COUNTY 001-156363-643300-00000 111-156332-643300-00000 111-156332-643300-00000 001-156363-643300-00000 001-156145-643300-00000 408-233312-643300-00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMT NET 91.08- 13.38- CHECK TOTAL 12,280.31 19.385.84 CHECK TOTAL 514.24 CHECK TOTAL 2,998.30 CHECK TOTAL 559.09 126.00 217.94 403.03 10.52 149.94 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 91.08- 13.38- 12.280.31 19,385.84 31.666.15 514.24 514.24 2.998.30 2.998.30 559.09 126.00 217.94 403.03 10.52 149.94 201 1.472.06 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041244 1492687/0193996 9/02 1492687/0193996 9/02 20042215 1495295/0195285 200153 1495295/0195282 20041244 8657431 0194315 9/02 20041244 1487705/0193999 9/02 1487705/0193999 9/02 20041244 8657533/0191596 8/02 8657533/0191596 8/02 20041244 8656593 0194063 9/02 20041244 1501694/0194046 9/02 1501694/0194046 9/02 20041244 2392759 0195294 9/02 20041244 1484455/0194064 9/02 1484455/0194064 9/02 20041244 1508117/0193701 9/02 1508117/0193701 9/02 20041244 1490811/0193700 9/02 1490811/0193700 9/02 20042172 1499673/0194038 09/02 200712 09/02 20041244 2392724 0194377 9/02 20041244 1501996/0195777 9/02 1501996/0195777 9/02 20041244 1484684/0194032 9/02 1484684/0194032 9/02 20041244 1478943/0194713 9/02 1478943/0194713 9/02 20041244 1496518/0194065 9/02 1496518/ 0194065 9/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111-156332-643300-00000 0.00 495-192370-643300-00000 0.00 001-155410-643300-00000 0.00 111-156332-643300-00000 0.00 490-144610-643300-00000 0.00 001-061010-643300-00000 0.00 001-156363-643300-00000 0.00 001-156160-643300-00000 0.00 001-061010-643300-00000 0.00 111-156332-643300-00000 0.00 113-138900-643300-00000 0.00 521-122410-643300-00000 0.00 001-156180-643300-00000 0.00 109-182602-643300-00000 0.00 109-182901-643300-00000 0.00 408-253211-643300-00000 0.00 130-157710-643300-00000 0.00 001-061010-643300-00000 0.00 AMT NET 579.32 126.00 238.10 714.14 10.52 126.00 366.50 89.50 403.03 311.11 403.03 217.94 89.50 54.85 163.09 217.94 206.38 89.50 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE VCHR NET 579.32 202 126. O0 238,10 714,14 10.52 126.00 366.50 89.50 403.03 311.11 403.03 217.94 89.50 217.94 217.94 206.38 89.50 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20041244 1481553 0194718 9/02 20041244 1499835 0194030 9/02 20041244 8657878/0194005 9/02 8657878/0194005 9/02 20041244 2160394/0195352 9/02 2160394/0195352 9/02 20041244 2307557/0195898 9/02 2307557/0195898 9/02 20041244 1514605 0194031 9/02 20042290 0074270-0332-7 8/02 0074270-0332-7 8/02 160187 20041244 2328597/0193990 9/02 2328597/0193990 9/02 20041244 1486636/0195352 9/02 1486636/0195352 9/02 20041244 2214338/0195646 9/02 2214338/0195646 9/02 20041244 1485915/0194034 9/02 1485915/0194034 9/02 20041244 1487683/0193998 9/02 1487683/0193998 9/02 20041244 1586193/0195899 9/02 1586193/0195899 9/02 20041244 1505851/0194045 9/02 1505851/0194045 9/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001-156140-643300-00000 0.00 001-061010-643300-00000 0.00 001-156175-643300-00000 0.00 111-156332-643300-00000 0.00 111-156332-643300-00000 0.00 001-061010-643300-00000 0.00 495-192370-643300-00000 0.00 001-156363-643300-00000 0.00 408-253212-643300-00000 0.00 408-253221-643300-00000 0.00 408-233352-643300-00000 0.00 111-156332-643300-00000 0.00 408-233351-643300-00000 0.00 001-156363-643300-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042182 590005 VENDOR 339390 - WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION 106879 408-233352-654110-00000 157951 BOOKS FOR TRAINING 0.00 AMT NET 10.52 89.50 533.23 238.10 15.14 149.94 227,61 403.03 403.03 126.00 66.00 641.13 195.11 311,11 CHECK TOTAL 268.25 CHECK TOTAL 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 203 VCHR NET 10,52 89.50 533.23 238.10 15.14 149.94 227.61 403.03 403.03 126.00 66.00 641.13 195.11 311.11 9,282.42 268.25 268.25 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET CHECK NO 590117 VENDOR 362610 - WATER WORKS AQUATIC PT, INC. 20042188 G.COOPERSMITH 7/23-7/30 159958 G.COOPERSMITH 7/23-7/30 001-155930-631990-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589569 VENDOR 20042291 217513 156987 BENCH 19530 - WAUSAU TILE 001-156363-646316-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 589720 VENDOR 187100 - WAVV-RADIO 20042192 8029 159767 RADIO SPOTS 001-100130-648160-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042187 589657 VENDOR 155480 - WESTCOAST VETERINARY CLINIC 3457 7/2/02 001-155410-631970-00000 159963 VET CARE 0.00 CHECK NO 20042286 20042286 590073 VENDOR 356520 - WFTX-TV 20910037 205483 TV AD SPOTS 9/02 20910037 205483 TV AD SPOTS 9/02 470-173462-634999-00000 470.173462-634999-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042191 589977 VENDOR 331470 - WGCU-TV PS-3010 160035 CTY HIGHLIGHTS 001-100130-634999-00000 0.00 CHECK NO 20042287 589834 VENDOR 264710 - WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES LTD 12578 111-156313-634999-00000 203835 WATER SLIDE CLEANING 0.00 250.25 CHECK TOTAL 677.00 CHECK TOTAL 284.75 CHECK TOTAL 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 285.00 570.00 CHECK TOTAL 618.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,000.00 16J VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 PAGE 204 VCHR NET 250.25 250.25 677.00 677.00 284.75 284.75 50.00 50,00 285.00 570.00 855,00 618.00 618.00 1,000.00 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 20042217 590133 VENDOR 363290 - WILLIAM A. DELUCCIA, MD, PA Y.ZAPATA 7/4/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160137 Y.ZAPATA 7/4/02 0.00 CHECK NO 20042295 589938 VENDOR 316740 - WILLIAM D LORENZ OR 8/1 & 14 TRVL WM LORENZ 111-178980-640300-00000 8/1 & 8/14 TRVL WM LORENZ 0.00 CHECK NO 20042176 589718 VENDOR 186530 - WILLIAM J. VARIAN CONSTRUCTION CO. #3 001-121710-634999-00000 205765 PERMIT FEE,LABOR,MATERIALS 0.00 CHECK NO 20042173 589839 VENDOR 267390 - WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN INC 26905211 9/4/02 301-120435-634999-80525 301-120435-762200-52001 206704 SERVICE 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20041405 20042203 589627 VENDOR 130660 - WILSON, MILLER ET AL 57770 202719 TO 8/16/02 109-182602-631400-00000 57771 200110 TO 8/16/02 109-182602-634300-00000 0.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042218 589936 VENDOR 315760 - WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE PHYSICIANS S.VIDAURRI 8/2/02 001-155930-631210-00000 160138 S.VIDAURRI 8/2/02 0.00 CHECK NO 590039 VENDOR 347500 - WOODS HOLE GROUP 16J ~ NET CHECK TOTAL 227.50 CHECK TOTAL 34.22 CHECK TOTAL 7,229.15 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,578.00 CHECK TOTAL 512.00 500.00 CHECK TOTAL 70.20 CHECK TOTAL VCHR DISC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 205 VCHR NET 1,000.00 227.50 227.50 34.22 34.22 7,229.15 7,229.15 3,578.00 3,578. O0 512.00 500.00 1,012. O0 70.20 70.20 SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT 100-601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20042316 2004 REVISED 203233 6/1-30/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 325-172984-631400-31011 0.00 CHECK NO 20042309 590097 VENDOR 360880 - WTW MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS 00015407 414-263611-764180-73916 206766 CHEM. 0.00 CHECK NO 20042140 589840 VENDOR 270320 - WZVN-ABC 52113 9/8 205471 FUZZ WASTE Ai)S 470-173462-634999-00000 lbJ CHECK NO 20042174 589956 VENDOR 324850 - XEROX CORPORATION 10397338 8/14 001-010510-651110-00000 201755 MAINTENANCE CHECK NO 20042193 20042177 20042177 589570 VENDOR 20050 - ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 89165836 198-157410-652990-00000 159454 FIRST AID KIT 89165749 157940 SUPPL. 89433111 157940 SUPPL. 111-156425-652720-00000 111-156425-652720-00000 AMT NET VCHR DISC 23.947.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20,890.00 0.00 CHECK NO 20042186 589674 VENDOR 164080 - ZEP MANUFACTURING CO. 64260477 408-233351-652990-00000 159111 SUPPL. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 702 CHECKS WRITTEN l PAGE 206 VCHR NET 23.947.50 23,947.50 20.890.00 20,890.00 0.00 722.00 0.00 722.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 722.00 0.00 114.84 0.00 114.84 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 114.84 0.00 28.15 0,00 28.15 0.00 21.75 0.00 21.75 0.00 286.75 0.00 286.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 336.65 0.00 972.69 0.00 972.69 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 GRAND TOTAL 0.00 972.69 6,759.972.47 '"' ~ECEIVED ~! AGENDA Collier Soil and Water Conservation Board of Supe~so~ Au~st 21, 2002 1. Call to order 2. Roll call 3. Dispositionof6-19-02 minutes 4. Reports a. Financial b. DC Report c. MIL Report d. FDACS - Rebecca Elliot 5. Old Business a. RC&D Endorsement 6. New Business a. Budget b. Insurance c. Malibu Lakes 7. Other Business a. Disposal of Typewriter 8. Adjournment Item# Copies 1o: Subject to Board Approval Collier Soil & Water Conservation District Regular Meeting June 19, 2002 Supervisors Present: Supervisors absent: Others present: Michael R. Ramsey, Chair Stanley Weiner, Vice-Chair Sean Morton, Secretary/Treasurer Michael Simonik Carmine Pittelli (resigned) Nancy Hughes, Administrative Assistant Tony Polizos, NRCS Rebecca Elliot, FDACS Michael Urbanik The meeting was called to order by Chair Michael R. Ramsey at 5:10 p.m. at the Collier County Extension Service at 14700 Immokalee Road. Motion was made by Stan Weiner to approve the minutes of the May meeting, seconded by Sean Morton, motion passed. The Financial Report for May was passed out for board review. Nancy informed the board that we had received the Lower West Coast MIL 1st and 2nd Quarters payment along with the Big Cypress Basin MIL 4th Quarter payment. Tony Polizos went over his DC Report. The Big Cypress Basin MIL 1st Quarter Report was also passed out for board review. The BCB MIL has started its second year and completed 28 evaluations during the first quarter. The evaluations were of sprinkler systems at single- family homes in Naples and Marco Island. Evaluations were also completed at a church and a community of single family homes in Naples identified as a high water user. Tony Polizos went over the Cooperative Working Agreement between the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and the Collier Soil and Water Conservation District. Tony then went on to the next item under New Business, the formation of an EQIP Working Group. Tony explained that the rules have changed this year for the Old Farm Bill 1996 dealing with the EQIP cost share programs to implement conservation practices. Funding will be based on a tier system. A representative from NRC, S, FSA, the Extension Service and the Soil and Water District will form the EQIP Working Group for Collier County. Michael Ramsey volunteered to represent the SWD. The meeting is set for July 26th at 10:00 am at the Collier Extension Service at 14700 Immokalee Road. 16J 1 Next item under New Business was the Contract for Markham, Norton and Stroemer to continue on as the Districts auditors. Nancy informed the board that the auditors were extremely helpful and timely in answering all questions, willing to come to the office when needed and familiar with all aspects of the District. After some discussion a motion was made by Stan Weiner to approve the 3-year contract, seconded by Sean Morton and the motion passed. Final item under New Business was the request for a pay increase for MIL Technician David Roddguez. David has been working for the District for a year as of June 4t~. David exceeds in all aspect of his job performance evaluation, being a conscientious hard worker. David has represented the District at the CEEC Meetings, numerous workshops, the Collier County Water Symposium, was the Districts Environthon representative and judge at the Collier County Regional Science Fair. Sean. Morton moved to give a 6% pay raise, seconded by Stan Weiner, and the motion was passed. Under Other Business, Tony Polizos explained to the board that a RC&D Council is being proposed for Lee, Collier, Charlotte, Glades and Hendry counties. RC&D's help people plan and carry out activities that increase conservation of natural resources, support economic development and enhance the environment and standard of living in local communities. The program objectives focus on "quality of life" improvements. A meeting is set for July 24th at 1:00 p.m. at the Fort Myers Extension Office to explain the steps needed to form a RC&D Council which will be made up of non-elected officials. The DC's from the three counties would be sending out letters to various members of the communities inviting them to participate in this first meeting. Michael Ramsey expressed an interest in attending. Next item under Other Business, Rebecca Elliot introduced herself as the new Florida Department Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) staff member liaison. She will coordinate information to and input from the Soil & Water Districts to FDACS. Final item under Other Business, Nancy briefly went over the election qualifications for the open seats on the board. Qualifying will be July 22nd through noon on July 26th. Meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. 1:00 PM 08121102 Accrual Basis Collier Soil & Water Conservation District Profit & Loss June 2002 Z6J J. Income 640 · Interest 650. MIL Total Income Expense Contingency Fund Office Expenses 730 - Office Supplies 740 · Other Supplies 780 - Postage/Fed Ex Total Office Expenses Payroll Expenses 701 · Employer FICA 702 · Employer MC 703 · Other Taxes FUTA Tax UCT-6 Tax Total 703 · Other Taxes Payroll Expenses - Other Total Payroll Expenses 700 - Salaries Employee FICA Employee MC Withholding Total 700 · Salaries 704 · Florida Retirement Syst... 720-Insurance 790 - Cellular Phone 800 · Vehicle Expense 810 · Travel 818 · ROMA 820 - Miscellaneous TotalExpense Netincome Jun 02 11.15 27,250.00 27,261.15 370.97 13.76 145.34 18.20 177.30 843.20 197.20 7.68 5.44 13.12 5,440.00 6,493.52 505.92 118.32 945.00 1,569.24 595.68 2,023.00 159.50 6.36 365.40 8.34 13.97 11,783.28 15,477.87 ' t:~3 PM 'Coll[~r Soil' &:Water conservation District 08/21/02 PrOfit & Loss Accrual Basis July 2002 Jul 02 Income Mlsc Income 630 · Soil Survey 20.00 Total Misc Income 20.00 640 · Interest 11.77 650 - MIL BCB Urban MIL 12,500.00 Total 650 - MIL 12,500.00 Total Income 12,531.77 Expense Contingency Fund 576.99 Office Expenses 730 - Office Supplies 159.27 740 · Other Supplies 148.67 780 · Postage/Fed Ex 107.85 Total Office Expenses 415.79 Payroll Expenses 701 · Employer FICA 682.88 702 - Employer MC 159.72 703 · Other Taxes FUTA Tax 7.36 UCT-6 Tax 24.62 Total 703 - Other Taxes 31.98 Payroll Expenses. Other 5,574.40 Total Payroll Expenses 6,448.98 700 · Salaries Employee FICA 337.28 Employee MC 78.88 Withholding 630.00 Total 700 · Salaries 1,046.16 704- Florida Retirement Sys... 397.12 710 · Dues 50.00 720 · Insurance 473.00 790 · Cellular Phone 36.54 800 · Vehicle Expense 75.25 820 · Miscellaneous DR-15 Sales Tax 4.09 820 · Miscellaneous - Other 23.29 Total 820 · Miscellaneous 27.38 Total Expense 9,547.21 Net Income 2,984.66 DC REport Naples Field Office August 21, 2002 July - August Report Landuser Acres Location EOIP Applications Processing Jay Dana ( Exotic Control)' 200 Davis Finks Cattle Co. (Pasture Mgt. & Exotic) 49 Louisa Soler (irrigation) 5 Harvest Farms (irrigation) 1 Hy. 8'58 & DeSoto Hy. 858 N. Belle Meade Area Immokalee 163 WHIP Application Processing Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary (exotic control & presc, bum) 1004 Corkscrew Conservation Planning Immokalee Ranch (on-going) 26,000 Pacific Tomato Growers (complete) 7,000 North Grove (on-going) 6,000 Ban-on Collier Hunt Preserve (partial) 5,000 T0piai'y Creations (new) 55 Immokalee Hy. 858 Hy. 29N Hy. 858 Keane Av. Wetland Determinations Pat Burrows (completion & stakeout) 10 N. Belle Meade Others ROMA - Assisted consultant define new ROMA boundaries. CR - Completed mandatory Civil Rights training. Plant Materials - Assisted Brooksville Plant Materials Center staffwith evaluation of plantings of 2 varieties of maidencane and one of eastern gama grass on a ranch in a slough. Water Quality Certification - Passed test for certification for pesticide management. Jury Duty - Served for one day in Iuly. ICC - Attended the regular meeting of the Irrigation Conservation Committee in Naples· TMDL's - Attended DEP's meeting in Ft. Myers to release TMDL data and map of' impaired watersheds and waterbodies for our area. SW F1 Feasibility Study - Attended a regular meeting of the Study Team. Water Reservations and critical projects were discussed and an update for each of the sub committees. PD Veg. Committee - Participated in finalizing last draf~ of the pre-development vegetation maps for the SW Fl. Feasibility Study. RC&D - Attended public meeting to announce and get feedback for proposed area to be called SW Florida RC&D. About 25 were in attendance with 5 from Collier Co. The SW Florida Regional Planning Council unanimously approved to support the RC,&D and to provide office space, equipment, and some personnel to get it started. Had the first executive board of director's meeting. David P. Loving, Everglades City councilperson, will represent Collier Co. on the board. Two more members will be selected by the board to serve as regular members. thonolizos servationist 16J Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services CHARLES H. BRONSON, Commissioner Please Respond to: Rebecca Elliott FDACS, Office of Agricultural Water Policy P.O. Box 24680 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 (561) 682-6040 relliott @ sfwmd.gov 1 Collier Soil & Water Conservation District Meeting FDACS Memo - August 21, 2002 1. WATER USE RULES SFWMD held public workshops on revisions to a series of water use rules known as the "B" list rules. There is concern among all the users that the proposed "B" list of rules doesn't include all those that are interrelated. Regulated interest have consistently recommended that Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) rules that are inter-related are required to be adopted concurrently. The revisions currently proposed were presented by SFWMD staff to the SFWMD Governing Board at their August meeting. Representatives from the various stakeholders also spoke from their perspective during the public comment period. The Governing Board directed that the issues and concerns be addressed in two forums; one being a Governing Board Workshop where staff and stakeholders will be able to give detailed substantive presentations to the Board and the other being an assignment to the Water Resource Advisory Council (WRAC) to conduct their own meetings to investigate and define the issues for a consensus recommendation. These meetings will be scheduled for sometime in September and October. Staff is hoping to move the "B" List Rule development to a Governing Board hearing to publish in November so the can move to a Governing Board hearing to adopt in time to meet the next round of permit renewals which begins with the Upper East Coast Basin A on February 15, 2003. For information on this topic using the SFWMD web page go to www.sfwmd.gov and look on the left hand side of the home page for the "News" item which is "Water Use Rulemaking ..... ". 2. WATER RESERVATIONS - part of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) A Water Reservations site has been also been posted on the SFWMD web page at www.sfwmd.gov to address issues related to the reservation of water for the environment and assurances for existing legal sources consistent with Federal and State law. Look on the left-hand side of the home page for the "News" item "Reservations .... "This has also become an area of critical concern for the water supply stakeholders since the process will establish the protection of the water supply sources for uses existing as of December 2000. A 2000 Pre-CERP Legal Sources Baseline is being developed which, as its currently taking shape, will be used to determine water allocation in the SFWMD for approximately the next 30- 50 years. The stakeholders are asking for a clearer distinction between Florida's State Water Law and its integration into the federal CERP components. As it stands now, the WRAC members are tasked with providing direction to SFWMD staff on policy decisions regarding this baseline. The interconnectivity of this process is one of the issues for the "B" List Water Rules. Page 1 of 2 16J 3. TOTAL MAXIMUM DALLY LOADS The July 25th, 2002 Public Meeting at the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Service Center in Fort Myers was well attended. FDEP staff presented an overview of the program and a Draft Verified List of Impaired Waters for the Everglades West Coast Basin. They also presented maps depicting the data category status of areas within the basin. Waters which are finally "verified" as Category 5 -" Water quality standards not attained; water impaired and requires a TMDL" will be subject to pollutant load reduction goals and watershed implementation plans. FDEP and FDACS will continue with agriculture's self implementing BMP approach to reduce nonpoint source pollution. FDACS will develop BMPs for producers to install for a liability waiver and FDEP will verify the effectiveness of the BMPs for a report to the Florida Legislature on the self-implementing approach on January 1,2005. Two FDEP websites for TMDL related information are http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/tmdl and http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/watersheds As a special note, a large amount of data generated by Collier County will not be included in this initial assessment of the Everglades West Coast Basin because it is not in the national STORET database in time. This data set will probably not be included until the Group 1 Basins are revisited in 5 years for another comprehensive review of potentially impaired waters requiring a TMDL. The Collier County data omission has been noted by FDEP but the cut-off date for retention of federal funding related to this program for the Group One Basins is October 1 2002. As I understand it, FDEP is planning to make one more computer assessment run on August 29 in order to incorporate other additional data provided in a useable format since the August 7 assessment which is the current basis for the Southwest Everglades Basin verified list. 4. UPDATE OF SUPERVISOR'S HANDBOOK UNDERWAY by FDACS Any suggestions welcome. Goal is to have this project completed in early Fall, 2002. 5. MIL 5 Year Plan FDACS Office of Agricultural Water Policy (OAW) is participating in the development of the MIL 5 Year as part of its commitment to support and promote the SWCD efforts in this area. We hope a Water Conservation Program budget will be approved on an ongoing basis for use in funding conservation programs in general and MILs in particular throughout Florida. Page 2 of 2 Collier Soil & Water Conservation District Budget Overview Oct '01 - Sop 02 Oct '02 - Sop '03 Income Carry Over- Prior Year 38,681.00 21,331.00 Mlso Income 810. Sales Tax 120.00 0.00 820 · Shipping & Handling 250.00 0.00 630 · Soil Survey 100.00 100.00 Total Miso Income 470.00 100.00 600. Florida Plats 640 · Interest 850. MIL BCB Urban MIL 660. MIL - Other Total 660. MIL Total Income Expense Capital Outlay Contingency Fund Office Expenses 730 · Office Supplies 740- Other Supplies 760. Books/PubliCations 780. Postage/Fed Ex 830- Bank Servl~e Charge Total Office Expenses Payroll Expenses 703. Other Taxes FUTA Tax UCT-6 Tax Total 703. Other Taxes Total Payroll Expenses 700 · Salaries 704 · Florida Retirement System 710 · Dues 720. Insurance 760 · Printing I Advertising 770- Professional Fees 790 · Cellular Phone 800- Vehicle Expense 810. Travel 816. Florida Plat 818- ROMA 820. Miscellaneous Total Expense 2,000.00 160.00 50,000.00 53,5OO.OO 103,600.00 141,711.00 10,600.00 2,970.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 400.00 1,OO0.00 50.00 4,960.00 240.00 71,$80.00 6,091.00 2,000.00 10,600.00 1,600.00 4,600.00 400.00 3,900.00 1,300.00 600.00 20,000.00 1,600.00 0.00 100.00 50,000.00 54,000.00 104,000.00 125,531.00 2,600.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 1,700.00 450.00 850.OO 0 6,600.00 170.00 75.00 245.OO 248.00 78,01t.00 4,176.00 1,100.00 10,800.00 1,600.00 4,600.00 1,000.00 1,600.00 0.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 125,531.00 16J 1 Page I of I 16J 1~ Lower West Coast Mobile Irrigation Laboratory Third Quarter Report Fiscal Year 2002 Sponsored by: South Florida Water Management District Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Collier Soil and Water Conservation District Agriculture Center 14700 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34120 (941) 455-4100 16J 1 USDA- Natural Resources Conservation Service The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 16J 1 Abstract The Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2002, from April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2002 continues the fourteenth year of the Lower West Coast Mobile Irrigation Lab (MIL). The MIL completed 28 evaluations during the third quarter; 8 evaluations were agricultural, and 20 were urban sprinkler system evaluations. The agricultural evaluations were all citrus systems that normally are the bulk of our assistance. The agricultural evaluations were completed on a large citrus grove in Hendry County. The Urban sprinkler system evaluations were of multi-family residences in a gated community in Naples. The MIL staff prepared and set up a display booth and participated in the evening speakers panel of the Collier County Water Symposium held at International College. These 28 evaluations represent one quarter of the contract goals for FY 2002, and it is anticipated that the annual contract goals will be completed in the fourth quarter. 16J Mobile Irrigation Laboratory Quarterly Report Lower West Coast MIL Naples Field Office Third Quarter FY 2002 - April 1, 2002 to June 30, 2002 1 SYSTEMS EVALUATED This report covers the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2002. The MIL completed 28 evaluations during the quarter. Eight (8) evaluations were Agricultural systems, and twenty (20) were Urban sprinkler system evaluations. Of the total evaluations, the 8 sprayjet systems on citrus represented 29%, and the 20 Urban were 71% (Chart I). These systems irrigated 221.0 acres, and 9.1 acres, respectively, for a total of 230.1 irrigated acres. RESULTS Agricultural system evaluations are rated based on the measured Emission Uniformity (EU) of systems. Chart 2 shows that of the 8 Agricultural evaluations no (0) sprayjet systems were Poor (<70%), four (4) were Fair (70-79%), four (4) were Good (80-89%) and none (0) were Excellent (above 90%). WATER SAVINGS Potential Water Savings are based on first time evaluations and estimate the amount of water that would be saved by making the recommended system improvements and/or following recommended irrigation scheduling guides. Potential Water Savings (PWS) for third quarter evaluations were estimated at 18.62 million gallons (57.14 acm-feet). Actual Water Savings are calculated from follow-up re-evaluations. No follow-up re-evaluations were reported. An analysis of the third quarter Water Savings (Chart 3) shows that the average Potential Water Savings per acre for citrus systems were 0.06 million gallons per acre, and .50 million gallons per acre for urban systems. Following is a list of common problems that were encountered which limited the efficiency of the systems evaluated: -Lower pressure than manufacturer's specifications -Different pressures between manifolds -Poor overlap, improper sprinkler spacing -Turf and landscape area irrigated in the same zone -Mixed sprinklers - precipitation not matched -Mixed sprinkler brands and/or types -Missing/malfunctioning sprinklers -Missing/malfunctioning pressure gauge, regulator, valves -Leaks in pipes, laterals, tubes, sprinklers -Broken sprinklers -Sprinkler overflow -Clogged emitters/sprinklers -Stream of water blocked by vegetation -Operating time too long or too frequent -No rain shut-off device 16J 1 PUblic Relations and Additional Activities April MIL staff attended and chaired the Irrigation Conservation Committee for all MIL's held at the FFVA Headquarters in Orlando. Agenda items included FDACS and SFWMD funding, MIL Urban and Agricultural methodology and software. May · MIL staff participated in the Collier County Water Symposium. · MIL team leader attended the NRCS training in Irrigation Water Management. June · MIL staff cooperated with the Univ. of FL. IFAS, Immokalee, in their research project on emitter plugging. Key to Table Problems 1. Undersized pump for number and type of sprinkler heads 2. Undersized pipe creating excessive friction losses 3. Higher pressure than manufacturer's specifications 4. Lower pressure than manufacturer's specifications 5. Low system pressure due to water supply 6. Different pressures between manifolds. 7. Poor emitter orifice uniformity 8. Poor overlap, improper sprinkler/emitter spacing 9. Small wetted area 10. Pressure loss due to inadequate pipe size 11. Application rate > soil infiltration rate (ponding) 12. Air in lines 13. Turf and landscape area irrigated in the same zone 14. Pressure variation due to elevation differences 15. Mixed sprinklers/emitters - precipitation not matched 16. Mixed sprinkler/emitter brands or types in same zone 17. Various riser heights in same zone 18. Missing/malfunctioning emitters or sprinklers 19. Missing/malfunctioning pressure gauge, regulator, valves 20. Leaks in pipes, laterals, tubes, emitters/sprinklers 21. Clogged filter SJ 1 16J ! CH Charlotte CS Coarse Sand CO Collier S Sand GL Glades FS Fine Sand HE Hendry VFS Very Fine Sand LE Lee ** Follow-up re-evaluation. Soil Type Soil Texture (Urban) NOTE: Evaluation and/or design may involve private consultants in cooperation with USDA-NRCS. 22. Missing/broken emitters/sprinklers 23. Sprinkler overflow 24. Clogged emitters/sprinklers 25. Stream of water blocked by vegetation 26. Variable crop spacing 27. Poor drainage, requiring water control 28. System used for frost protection only 29. Operating time too long 30. Operating time too short 31. No rain shut-off device 32. No soil moisture measuring device Follow-up Requirements 1. Not necessary. 2. Review and evaluate recommendations through computer modeling. Document changes implemented by cooperator. A redesign may be needed in accordance with NRCS standards and specifications. 3. Re-evaluate system in the field after recommendations have been implemented. 0 0 16J 1 MGlacre Collier County Soil Legend Revised Jan. 1990 - H. Yamataki l_6J 1_ HYDRIC H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 2 3 4 6 7 8 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 2O 21 22 23 25 27 28 29 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4O 41 42 43 45 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 56 HOLOPAW FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM MALABAR FS CHOBEE, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM and DANIA MUCKS, DEPRESSIONAL RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM - COPELAND FS IMMOKALEE FS MYAKKA FS OLDSMARFS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM HALLANDALE FS PINEDA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM POMELLO FS OLDSMAR FS BAS1NGER FS RIVIERA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM FT. DRUM and MALABAR HIGH FS BOCA FS CHOBEE, WINDER and GATOR SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW and OKEELANTA SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM and COPELAND FS, DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW FS PINEDA and RIVIERA FS WABASSO FS HILOLO, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, JUPITER and MARGATE SOILS URBAN LAND URBAN LAND - HOLOPAW, BASINGER COMPLEX URBAN LAND - IMMOKALEE, OLDSMAR, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM COMPLEX URBAN LAND - AQUENTS COMPLEX, ORGANIC SUBSTRATUM UDORTHENTS, SHAPED TUSCAWILLA FS URBAN LAND - MATLACHA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, BOCA COMPLEX SATELLITE FS DURBIN and WULFERT MUCKS URBAN LAND - SATELLITE COMPLEX CANAVERAL BEACHES ASSOCIATION WINDER, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM and CHOBEE SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL PAOLA FS (1% - 8 % slopes) PENNSUCCO SOIL (marl prairie) HALLANDALE and BOCA FS (slough) OCHOPEE FSL, PRAIRIE (marl) OCHOPEE FSL KESSON MUCK, FREQUENTLY FLOODED ESTERO and PECKISH SOILS, FREQUENTLY FLOODED JUPITER, BOCA COMPLEX BASINGER FS, OCCASIONALLY FLOODED 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 31 32 33 34 37 39 42 43 44 45 47 49 50 51/55 53 56 57 58 Hendry County Soil Legend BOCA SAND PINEDA SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM OLDSMAR SAND EAUGALLIE SAND WABASSO SAND IMMOKALEE SAND MALABAR SAND RIVIERA FINE SAND PINEDA FINE SAND EAUGALLIE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM WINDER FINE SAND GENTRY FINE SAND WABASSO SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM MYAKKA SAND BASINGER SAND POMPANO SAND GATOR MUCK OKEELANTA MUCK HOLOPAW SAND VALKARIA SAND HALLANDALE SAND POMELLO FINE SAND, 0 to 5 PERCENT SLOPES HOLOPAW SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM RIVIEKEA SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM BOCA SAND, DEPRESSIONAL OLDSMAR SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM PARKWOOD FINE SAND RIVIERA SAND, DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW SAND, DEPRESSIONAL BLUFF SANDY CLAY LOAM, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM TUSCAWILLA FINE SAND UDORTHENTS, 0 to 5 PERCENT SLOPES RIVIERA SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, DEPRESSIONAL POPLE FINE SAND JUPITER FINE SAND PAHOKEE MUCK UDORTHENTS- PITS COMPLEX, 0 to 2 PERCENT SLOPES MATLACHA 0 to 2 PERCENT SLOPES DELRAY MUCKY SAND MALABAR FINE SAND, HIGH ADAMSVILLE FINE SAND TERRA CEIA MUCK CHOBEE SANDY LOAM OLDSMAR SAND, DEPRESSIONAL 16J 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Hendry County Soil Legend CONE WINDER FINE SAND, DEPRESSIONAL MYAKKA SAND, DEPRESSIONAL MALABAR SAND, DEPRESSIONAL PINEDA SAND, DEPRESSIONAL HALLANDALE© ROCK OUTCROP COMPLEX HALLANDALE SAND, DEPRESSIONAL PLANTATION MUCK MARGARE FINE SAND LAUDERHILL MUCK DANIA MUCK DENAUD- GATOR MUCK DENAUD 160 Il AGENDA Collier Soil and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors June 19, 2002 1 2. 3. 4. o Call to order Roll call Disposition of5-15-02 minutes Reports a. Financial b. DC Report c. MIL Report New Business a. Review of Agreement with NRCS b. EQIP Working Group Representative c. Auditor Contract d. David Rodriguez - Pay Increase Other Business a. RC&D Meeting July 24th 7. Adjournmem Subject to Board Approval Collier Soil & Water Conservation District Regular Meeting May 15, 2002 Supervisors present: Others present: Michael R. Ramsey, Chair Stanley Weiner, Vice-Chair Sean Morton, Secretary/Treasurer Michael Simonik Carmine Pittelli Nancy Hughes, Administrative Assistant Tony Polizos, NRCS Jeff Tuscan, Markham Norton Stroemer Mike Moore The meeting was called to order by Chair Michael R. Ramsey at 5:00 p.m. at the Collier County Extension Service at 14700 ]:mmokalee Road. Motion was made by Sean Morton to approve the minutes of the March meeting, seconded by Michael Simonik, motion passed. The Financial Report for March and April was passed out for board review. Nancy informed the board that we are still waiting for the 4th Quarter Payment for the Big Cypress Basin M]:L along with the 1~ and 2nd Quarter Payments for the Lower West Coast M]:L Tony Polizos passed out his DC Report for review and informed the board that two EQ]:P Contracts were awarded this fiscal year. The Lower West Coast M]:L's 2nd Quarter Report was also passed out for board review. The LWC M]:L completed 27 evaluations, all agriculture, including 1 follow-up. The evaluations were on citrus grOves in Charlotte and Hendry counties, plus the Budwood Grove at ]:FAS in ]:mmokalee. .leff Tuscan went over with the board the Fiscal Year 00-01 Audit and General Purpose Financial Statement and informed the board that they were in compliance..left did bring to the attention of the board that they will nccd to either adopt a written investment policy or adopt to stay with Florida Statue 218.415 and abide by it's rules. Jeff also explained the new Government Auditing Standards that are anUcipated to be effective for September 30, 2004. Once these new standards are implemented, there will be 3 sections to the audit, thus increasing the length of Ume to complete. After reviewing the context of the Audit Report, Start Weiner moved to accept the Audit as presented, Michael Simonik seconded and the moUon passed. 16J Next item under New Business, was a discussion on the legal representation contract from Mimi Wolok to conUnue representing the District in ROMA activities. Ms. Wolok's fee for services would be at a rate of $175.00/hour, plus expenses. After some discussion, Carmine Pittelli moved to accept her proposed contract due to the fact that she has knowledge on the process of the ROMA, being involved since conception. Stan Weiner SeConded the motion, which was passed by a majority. Nancy next requested approval from the board to purchase a new desk for the office. Upon obtaining 3 quotes, a U-shaped desk was found for approximately $400. Carmine Pittelli moved to purchase the desk, seconded by Michael Ramsey and the motion passed. Final item under New Business was the need to Adjust the Budget by doing a Budget Transfer and reallocating funds from one budgetary account to another. ]~n order to have a better picture on expenditures, as new "ROMA Expenses" budgetary account with a budget of $20,000.00 should be added. ]:t was then recommended to the board that they transfer $15,000 from Professional Fees and $5,000 from Contingency to this new "ROMA" account,. Nancy also recommended that $600 be transferred from Florida Plats to Travel, $1,000 be transferred from Florida Retirement System to Miscellaneous and $2,400 be transferred from Capital Outlay to Vehicle Expense ~this is to cover the cost of repainting the Chevy pickup approved at the March 27 Regular Meeting). Carmine Pittelli moved to approve these budgetary transfers, seconded by Sean Morton and the motion passed. Under Other Business, it was with regret that Carmine Pittelli tendered his resignation as a supervisor of the Collier Soil & Water Conservation District. Carmine expressed his appreciation at having the opportunity to serve as a supervisor of the District. The next regular meeting of the CSWCD is set for June 19th at 5:00 p.m. at the Collier Extension Service. Meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. 0~t9~2 Collier Soil & Water Conservation District Profit & Loss May 2002 Income Misc Income 630- Soil Survey Total Misc Income 640 · Interest 650 · MIL BCB Urban MIL Total 650 · MIL Total Income Expense Office Expenses 730 · Office Supplies 740 · Other Supplies 750 · Books/Publications 780 · Postage/Fed Ex Total Office Expenses Payroll Expenses 701 · Employer FICA 702. Employer MC 703- Other Taxes FUTA Tm( UCT-6 Tax Total 703 · Other Taxes Payroll Expenses - Other Total Payroll Expenses 700 · Salaries Employee FICA Employee MC Withholding 700 · Salaries - Other Total 700 · Salaries 704. Florida Retirement System 760 · Printing / Advertising 770 · Professional Fees 790 - Cellular Phone 800 · Vehicle Expense 818. ROMA 820 · Miscellaneous Total Expense Net Income May 02 40.00 40.00 7.87 16,125.00 16,125.00 16,172.87 645.22 162.15 179.51 287.73 1,274.61 843.20 197.21 125.12 2.72 127.84 8,160.00 9,328.25 337.28 78.88 630.00 4,393.84 5,440.00 397.12 359.80 525.00 50.86 3,018.38 1,020.92 169.00 21,583.94 -6,41 t .07 16J DC Report Naples Field Office June 19, 2002 16J Landowner Acres Location Resource Management System Immokalee Ranch (planning) 20,000 North Grove (planning) 6,000 Harvest Farms (planning-EQIP) 1 Brush Management Bobby Kirkland Irrigation System-Trickle SWFREC (design) Dike Troyer Bros. Grove (layout) Wetland Determinations Pat Burrowes (preliminary) Others Hy 846E. Hy 29N. Lake Trafford Rd. 200 Hy 846 1 Hy 29N 12 Hy 82 10 Belle Meade *SWFF Study Team - Attended regular meeting. Discussed Issues Paper and status of subcommittees. *Natural Systems Subcommittee - Met to review pre-development maps for each county. *Training - Attended Nutrient Management Training in Okeechobee. *Teleconference - On the 2002 Farm Bill. 16J BIG CYPRESS BASIN URBAN MOBILE IRRIGATION LAB Quarterly Report Second Quarter Project Year 2002 - June I to August 31, 2002 Sponsored by: BIG CYPRESS BASIN OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT COLLIER SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT NRCS NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 14700 IMMOKALEE ROAD NAPLES, FLORIDA 34120 (941) 455-4100 16J 1t USDA- Natural Resources Conservation Service The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Abstract The Second Quarter of Project Year 2002, from June 1, 2002 through August 31, 2002 continues the second year of the Big Cypress Basin Mobile Irrigation Lab (BCBMIL). The BCBMIL completed 27 evaluations during the second quarter. The evaluations were of sprinkler systems at single-family homes in Naples and Marco Island. Evaluations were also completed at a large condominium, and a community of single family homes in Naples identified as a high water user. Public awareness and educational activities began with staff responding to numerous calls related to the new County water rate structure. The County Water Department referred customers with concerns over increases in water bills to us to advise them on appropriate irrigation schedules and system problems. The BCBMIL staff chaired the Irrigation Conservation Committee for all Florida MIL's, held at the Collier County Extension Service. The BCBMIL staff wrote a column on rain shut-off devices for the Naples Daily News. BCBMIL staff met with Collier County officials to initiate a demonstration project that will evaluate irrigation systems at County parks and road medians. These 27 evaluations and public education/awareness activities represent one quarter of the project goals for PY 2002. It is anticipated that the goals will continue to be met in the third quarter. SYSTEMS EVALUATED l_6J This report covers the second quarter of Project Year 2002. Twenty-seven evaluations of sprinkler irrigation systems were completed. Evaluations were of single-family homes in Naples and Marco Island, a large condominium in Naples, and a Naples community of single-family homes identified as a very high water user. System evaluations were completed using methods contained in the Mobile Irrigation Laboratory Urban Irrigation Evaluation Teaching Manual prepared by the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. System evaluations are rated based on the Distribution Uniformity (DU) of systems. The DU is a measurement of how evenly irrigation water can be applied to an area of turf. A DU of 85% is possible for a well designed sprinkler system. As DU decreases some areas of turf will receive less water while other areas are over- watered. Systems are often run longer to compensate for the uneven application of water. The DU can be measured through the use of a "catch can test", when appropriate, and is more frequently determined through a thorough visual inspection of the system in operation and measurement of pressures and flow rates. RESULTS The system ratings for the DU values are as follows: Distribution Uniformity % Rating 80 and above Excellent 70-79 Good 60-69 Fair < 60 Poor Of the 27 evaluations, 11 systems were rated Poor, 14 systems were rated Fair, and 2 were rated Good (Chart 1). No Follow-up re-evaluations were completed, but one property owner has requested a re-evaluation and is scheduled for the third quarter. WATER SAVINGS Potential Water Savings are based on first time evaluations and estimate the amount of water that would be saved by making the recommended system improvements and/or following recommended irrigation scheduling guides. Potential Water Savings (PWS) for second quarter evaluations were estimated at 3.60 million gallons (11.04 acre feet). Actual Water Savings are calculated from follow-up re-evaluations. Actual Water Savings are also now reported from changes to the control clock or repairs completed during the initial evaluation. Actual Water Savings (AWS) reported for seven second quarter evaluations were calculated at 4.04 million gallons. An analysis of the Potential Water Savings shows that the average water savings per system was 0.13 million gallons, or 133,000 gallons per year. As a result of Collier County and the City of Naples passing Irrigation Ordinances, many irrigation systems have been adjusted to operate only three times a week, on specified days, and during the hours of 12:01 AM to 8:00 AM. This has reduced the quantities of water unnecessarily used by overly frequent operation and irrigating during the heat of the day, which can cause significant losses from evaporation and wind drift. 16J Following is a list of common problems that were encountered which limited the efficiency of the systems evaluated: -Lower pressure than manufacturer's specifications -Poor overlap, improper sprinkler spacing -Tuff and landscape area irrigated in the same zone -Sprinkler precipitation not matched -Mixed sprinkler brands or types -Leaks in pipes, laterals, sprinklers -Sprinkler overflow -Stream of water blocked by vegetation -Operating time too long or too frequent -No rain shut-off device 1 PUBLIC AWARENESS AND EDUCATION The Public Awareness and Education element of the BCBMIL project is designed to deliver the water conservation message to large groups of people to complement the education of individual irrigation system owners and operators during evaluations. As a result of our involvement in the Collier County Water Symposium, the BCBMIL has become a familiar resource in the County. The Symposium served as a major catalyst to water conservation awareness and action throughout the County. Numerous customers reacting to water bills reflecting the new County rate structure were referred to us by the County. We advised the callers on appropriate irrigation schedules and other elements of irrigation water management. Several callers were scheduled for MIL evaluation. A major effort towards water conservation is in evidence in Collier County government. At a meeting with County officials the BCBMIL made plans to complete a demonstration project by evaluating the irrigation system at a representative County park, and on new County roadway medians. This demonstration will combine evaluation work with educational efforts targeting County staff. The County is in the process of reviewing irrigation systems at County facilities, to plan for system improvements. The goal is for the County to lead the community by example in becoming efficient water users. The BCBMIL hosted and chaired the Irrigation Conservation Committee for all Florida MILs. The progress of sub-committees working on developing an Urban Evaluation spreadsheet, a Distribution Uniformity estimation table, and MIL database dominated the agenda. B CBMIL staff researched and wrote a guest column on rain shut-off devices that appeared in the Naples Daily News and advertised the MIL. The BCBMIL Team 16J Robert Beck has been the Lower West Coast Mobile Irrigation Lab (MIL) Team Leader since February 1996, and riow also leads the new Big Cypress Basin MIL. He received a B.S. degree in Environmental Studies from Stockton State College. He was an Environmental Specialist with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection for 15 years before re-locating to southwest Florida. He is now a Soil Conservationist with the USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service and serves as the chair of the State Irrigation Conservation Committee, which represents the fourteen MILs in Florida. Bill Gaddis has been the BCBMIL technician with the Collier Soil and Water Conservation District since February of this year. Bill is retired from the U.S. Army. He received his A.A. degree from Dmry College. He is certified as a Master Gardener with the Collier County Extension Service and has several years' experience as a Pest Control Technician for residential and commercial lawns and landscapes. l_6J 1_' Public Awareness and Educational Activities June The BCBMIL staff responded to numerous calls related to the new County water rate structure. Callers were advised of appropriate irrigation schedules and other elements of irrigation water management to assist in analyzing water use. Several callers were scheduled for evaluation. July The BCBMIL staff chaired the Irrigation Conservation Committee for all Florida MIL's held at the Collier County Extension Service. Agenda items included MIL methodologies, Urban MIL evaluation spreadsheet, DU estimate table, NRCS technical oversight, and MIL funding. August · The BCBMIL staff researched and wrote a guest column about rain shut-off devices for the Naples Daily News. The BCBMIL staff met with Collier County officials to initiate a demonstration project that will evaluate the irrigation systems at County parks and road medians irrigated with re-use water. · The BCBMIL staff appeared before the Big Cypress Basin Board to present a progress report on the MIL program. ~16J Key to Table Problems 1. Undersized pump for number and type of sprinkler heads 2. Undersized pipe creating excessive friction losses 3. Higher pressure than manufacturer's specifications 4. Lower pressure than manufacturer's specifications 5. Low system pressure due to water supply 6. Different pressures between manifolds. 7. Poor emitter orifice uniformity 8. Poor overlap, improper sprinkler/emitter spacing 9. Small wetted area 10. Pressure loss due to inadequate pipe size 11. Application rate > soil infiltration rate (ponding) 12. Air in lines 13. Turf and landscape area irrigated in the same zone 14. Pressure variation due to elevation differences 15. Mixed sprinklers/emitters - precipitation not matched 16. Mixed sprinkler/emitter brands or types in same zone 17. Various riser heights in same zone 18. Missing/malfunctioning emitters or sprinklers 19. Missing/malfunctioning pressure gauge, regulator, valves 20. Leaks in pipes, laterals, robes, emitters/sprinklers 21. Clogged filter 16J 16J 22. Missing/broken emitters/sprinklers 23. Sprinkler overflow 24. Clogged emitters/sprinklers 25. Stream of water blocked by vegetation 26. Variable crop spacing 27. Poor drainage, requiring water control 28. System used for frost protection only 29. Operating time too long 30. Operating time too short 31. No rain shut-off device 32. No soil moisture measuring device Follow-up Requirements 1. Not necessary. 2. Review and evaluate recommendations through computer modeling. Document changes implemented by cooperator. A redesign may be needed in accordance with NRCS standards and specifications. 3. Re-evaluate system in the field after recommendations have been implemented. ** Follow-up re-evaluation. Soil Type (Urban) CS Coarse Sand S Sand FS Fine Sand VIeS Very Fine Sand NOTE: Evaluation and/or design may involve private consultants in cooperation with USDA-NRCS. AGENDA Collier Soil and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors September 18, 2002 1. Call to order 2. Roll call 3. Disposition of 8-21-02 minutes 4. Reports a. Financial b. DC Report c. MIL Report d. FDACS - Rebecca Elliot 5. Old Business a. RC&D 6. New Business a. Insurance 7. Other Business a. Next Board Meeting Date 8. Adjournment 1 Bate'. Co~es l_6j 1_ Subject to Board Approval Collier Soil & Water Conservation District Regular Meeting August 21, 2002 Supervisors presem: Michael R. Ramsey, Chair Stanley Weiner, Vice-Chair Scan Morton, Secretary/Treasurer Michael Simonik Supervisors absent: Carmine Pittelli (resigned) Others present: Nancy Hughes, Administrative Assistant Tony Polizos, NRCS Rebecca Elliot, FDACS Ty Agoston The meeting was called to order by Chair Michael R. Ramsey at 5:10 p.m. at the Collier County Extension Service at 14700 Immokatee Road. Nancy informed the supervisors that the June 19th minutes previously sent to them should be amended under Other Business to reflect that the RC&D Council being proposed was for Lee, Collier, Charlotte, Glades and Hendry counties. Motion was made by Michael Simonik to approve the minutes as amended, seconded by Sean Morton, motion passed. The Financial Reports for June and July was passed out for board review. Nancy informed the board that we are currently up to date on the receipt of all MIL payments due to us. Tony Polizos reviewed his DC Report with the board. Four EQIP applications were processed. At the July 24th RC&D planning meeting the SW Florida Regional Planning Council unanimously approved to support the RC&D and will provide office space, equipment and some personnel to help get it started. The LWC MIL 3rd Quarter Report was passed out. During the 3~d Quarter, the LWC MIL completed 28 evaluations; 8 were agricultural evaluations on a large citrus grove in Hendry County and 20 evaluations were urban sprinkler systems of multi-family residences in a gated community in Naples. Final item under Reports was a presentation by Rebecca Elliot of FDACS updating the board on the following subjects: 1. Public Workshops on the revisions to a series of water use rules knows as the "B" list rules. 2. A 2000 Pre-CERP (Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan) Legal Sources Baseline is being developed which, as its currently taking shape, will be used to determine water allocations in the SFWMD for approximately the next 30-50 years. 3. A Total Maximum Daily Loads public workshop was held on July 25~, 2002 at the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Service Center in Ft. Myers. 16J 1 4. An update of the Supervisor's Handbook is under way by FDACS. 5. A MIL 5-year plan is being developed. Under Old Business, the board voted to send an letter to Wayne Daltry, President of the RC&D Council, stating our support of the effort to establish a SW Florida Resource Conservation & Development Council (RC&D) for Collier, Lee, Charlotte, Hendry and Glades counties. Sean Morton moved to send the endorsement letter, seconded by Stan Weiner and the motion passed. Under New Business, Nancy requested that the board amend it's current budget to reflect that 701 Employer FICA and 702 Employer MC be moved and combined into 700 Salaries. This would make it easier to track within QuickBooks. Michael Simonik moved to make the proposed amendment to the current budget, seconded by Sean Morton, and the motion passed. Next item addressed was the Proposed Budget for FY02-03. Nancy went over the figures for the next fiscal year; showing anticipated revenue and expenditures. After reviewing the figures, Sean Morton moved to accept the Proposed Budget, Michael Simonik seconded and the motion passed. Nancy informed the Board that Florida League of Cities would no longer be providing insurance for the Honesty Blanket Bond, which was expiring on September 30, 2002. This non- renewal notice was issued in order to comply with the reinsurance requirements of the Florida Municipal Insurance Trust's (FMIT) property reinsurers. In order to continue to supply us with the Honesty Blanket Bond, they required us to insure our real and business personal property, of which we have none. Thus no renewal. The board supplied Nancy with several companies that she could check with to obtain Directors and Officers Insurance. Final item under New Business was a discussion on the steps the board needed to start taking to purchase land with the Malibu Lakes money. Nancy will start to contact several Title and Reaky Companies to get bids on what they will charge to find the land and purchase. We would like to have someone who can do everything fi:om start to finish: locating, surveys, conservation easement, phase 1 assessment and title closing. Under Other Business, Nancy requested authorization to dispose of the IBM Typewriter (Identification Number 2, purchased 1987). The motor had stopped working and was not worth fixing due to its age. Scan Morton moved to dispose and delete this item fi:om the District's Fixed Assets, seconded by Michael Simonik and the motion passed. The next meeting of the CSWCD Board is set for Wednesday, September 18m, at 5:00 p.m. at the Collier County Extension Service at 14700 Immokalee Road. Meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. 8:31 AM 09119102 Accrual Basis Collier Soil & Water Conservation District Profit & Loss Aug ust 2002 l_6J Income Mist Income 630 · Soil Survey Misc Income - Other Total Misc Income 640 · Interest 650 · MIL Total Income Expense Payroll Expenses 703 - Other Taxes FUTA Tax UCT-6 Tax Total 703 · Other Taxes Payroll Expenses - Other Total Payroll Expenses 700- Salaries 702- Employer MC 701 · Employer FICA Employee FICA Employee MC Withholding Total 700 · Salaries 704- Florida Retirement System 710- Dues 720 · Insurance Health Insurance Total 720 · Insurance 790- Cellular Phone Total Expense Aug 02 10.00 23.29 33.29 13.72 13,625.00 13,672.01 0.00 7.24 7.24 5,574.40 5,581.64 173.63 742.35 345.62 80.82 648.00 1,990.42 321.09 100.00 825.00 825.00 32.95 8,851.10 4,820.91 Net Income 16J DC Report Naples F. O. September 18, 2002 Landuser Acres 44 198 EQIP Submitted for Approval Davis Finks Cattle Co. Jay Dana Ranch Location Oil Well Grade Desoto Rd. EQIP FY03 English Bros (citrus) Pacific Tomato Growers Northside Partnership (citrus) 225 Hy858 2625 Hy858 405 Hy858 Conservation Plans Immokalee Ranch (completed) 26500 Hy 846E WHIP Submitted for Approval Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary 1080 Hy846 Nu~ient&PestManagement ImmokaleeRanch 2500 Hy846E Wetland Enhancement Don Finks 10 Oil Well Grade Pest Management E. Henderson (Br. Pepper) 4 Hy29S Irrigation Systems Assistance Pacific Tomato Growers 600 Hy858 Others R, C &D - Articles of Incorporation and 501C3 submitted for approval. Two projects will be submitted with application to NRCS. Met with Commissioner Fiala to get recommendations and with Everglades City Council to get letter of endorsement. Commissioner Coletta was there to here presentation. Also met with Burt Saunders to get letter of endorsement. Hot Spot Soils - Met with IFAS to discuss workshop for growers on problem soils and irrigation. 1 District ~nist 16J 1 BIG CYPRESS BASIN URBAN MOBILE IRRIGATION LAB Quarterly Report Second Quarter Project Year 2002 - June I to August 31, 2002 Sponsored by: BIG CYPRESS BASIN OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT COLLIER SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT , so^ NRCS NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 14700 IMMOKALEE ROAD NAPLES, FLORIDA 34120 (941) 455-4100 16J USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Abstract 16J The Second Quarter of Project Year 2002, from June 1, 2002 through August 31, 2002 continues the second year of the Big Cypress Basin Mobile Irrigation Lab (BCBM/L). The BCBMIL completed 27 evaluations during the second quarter. The evaluations were of sprinkler systems at single-family homes in Naples and Marco Island. Evaluations were also completed at a large condominium, and a community of single family homes in Naples identified as a high water user. Public awareness and educational activities began with staff responding to numerous calls related to the new County water rate structure. The County Water Department referred customers with concerns over increases in water bills to us to advise them on appropriate irrigation schedules and system problems. The BCBMIL staff chaired.the Irrigation Conservation Committee for all Florida MIL's, held at the Collier County Extension Service. The BCBMIL staff wrote a column on rain shut-off devices for the Naples Daily News. BCBMIL staff met with Collier County officials to initiate a demonstration project that will evaluate irrigation systems at County parks and road medians. These 27 evaluations and public education/awareness activities represent one quarter of the project goals for PY 2002. It is anticipated that the goals will continue to be met in the third quarter. 1 SYSTEMS EVALUATED This report covers the second quarter of Project Year 2002. Twenty-seven evaluations of sprinkler irrigation systems were completed. Evaluations were of single-family homes in Naples and Marco Island, a large condominium in Naples, and a Naples community of single-family homes identified as a very high water user. System evaluations were completed using methods contained in the Mobile Irrigation Laboratory Urban Irrigation Evaluation Teaching Manual prepared by the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. System evaluations are rated based on the Distribution Uniformity (DU) of systems. The DU is a measurement of how evenly irrigation water can be applied to an area of turf. A DU of 85% is possible for a well designed sprinkler system. As DU decreases some areas of turf will receive less water while other areas are over- watered. Systems are often run longer to compensate for the uneven application of water. The DU can be measured through the use of a "catch can test", when appropriate, and is more frequently determined through a thorough visual inspection of the system in operation and measurement of pressures and flow rates. RESULTS The system ratings for the DU values are as follows: · Distribution Uniformity % Rating 80 and above Excellent 70-79 Good 60-69 Fair < 60 Poor Of the 27 evaluations, 11 systems were rated Poor, 14 systems were rated Fair, and 2 were rated Good (Chart 1). No Follow-up re-evaluations were completed, but one property owner has requested a re-evaluation and is scheduled for the third quarter. WATER SAVINGS Potential Water Savings are based on first time evaluations and estimate the amount of water that would be saved by making the recommended system improvements and/or following recommended irrigation scheduling guides. Potential Water Savings (PWS) for second quarter evaluations were estimated at 3.60 million gallons (11.04 acre feet)· Actual Water Savings are calculated from follow-up re-evaluations. Actual Water Savings are also now reported from changes to the control clock or repairs completed during the initial evaluation. Actual Water Savings (AWS) reported for seven second quarter evaluations were calculated at 4.04 million gallons. An analysis of the Potential Water Savings shows that the average water savings per system was 0.13 million gallons, or 133,000 gallons per year. As a result of Collier County and the City of Naples passing Irrigation Ordinances, many irrigation systems have been adjusted to operate only three times a week, on specified days, and during the hours of 12:01 AM to 8:00 AM. This has reduced the quantities of water unnecessarily used by overly frequent operation hnd irrigating during the heat of the day, which can cause significant losses from evaporation and wind drift. 16J I Following is a list of common problems that were encountered which limited the efficiency of the systems evaluated: -Lower pressure than manufacturer's specifications -Poor overlap, improper sprinkler spacing -Turf and landscape area irrigated in the same zone -Sprinkler precipitation not matched -Mixed sprinkler brands or types -Leaks in pipes, laterals, sprinklers -Sprinkler overflow -Stream of water blocked by vegetation -Operating time too long or too frequent -No rain shut-off device PUBLIC AWARENESS AND EDUCATION The Public Awareness and Education element of the BCBMIL project is designed to deliver the water conservation message to large groups of people to complement the education of individual irrigation system owners and operators during evaluations. As a result of our involvement in the Collier County Water Symposium, the BCBMIL has become a familiar resource in the County. The Symposium served as a major catalyst to water conservation awareness and action throughout the County. Numerous customers reacting to water bills reflecting the new County rate structure were referred to us by the County. We advised the callers on appropriate irrigation schedules and other elements of irrigation water management. Several callers were scheduled for MIL evaluation. A major effort towards water conservation is in evidence in Collier County government. At a meeting with County officials the BCBMIL made plans to complete a demonstration project by evaluating the irrigation system at a representative County park, and on new County roadway medians. This demonstration will combine evaluation work with educational efforts targeting County staff. The County is in the process of reviewing irrigation systems at County facilities, to plan for system improvements. The goal is for the County to lead the community by example in becoming efficient water users. The BCBMIL hosted and chaired the Irrigation Conservation Committee for all Florida MILs. The progress of sub-committees working on developing an Urban Evaluation spreadsheet, a Distribution Uniformity estimation table, and MIL database dominated the agenda. BCBMIL staff researched and wrote a guest column on rain shut-off devices that appeared in the Naples Daily News and advertised the MIL. The BCBMIL Team 16J 1 Robert Beck has been the Lower West Coast Mobile Irrigation Lab (MIL) Team Leader since February 1996, and now also leads the new Big Cypress Basin MIL. He received a B.S. degree in Environmental Studies from Stockton State College. He was an Environmental Specialist with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection for 15 years before re-locating to southwest Florida. He is now a Soil Conservationist with the USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service and serves as the chair of the State Irrigation Conservation Committee, which represents the fourteen MILs in Florida. Bill Gaddis has been the BCBMIL technician with the Collier Soil and Water Conservation District since February of this year. Bill is retired from the U.S. Army. He received his A.A. degree from Dmry College. He is certified as a Master Gardener with the Collier County Extension Service and has several years' experience as a Pest Control Technician for residential and commercial lawns and landscapes. I Public Awareness and Educational Activities June The BCBMIL staff responded to numerous calls related to the new County water rate structure. Callers were advised of appropriate irrigation schedules and other elements of irrigation water management to assist in analyzing water use. Several callers were scheduled for evaluation. July The BCBMIL staff chaired the Irrigation Conservation Committee for all Florida MIL's held at the Collier County Extension Service. Agenda items included MIL methodologies, Urban MIL evaluation spreadsheet, DU estimate table, NRCS technical oversight, and MIL funding. August · The BCBMIL staff researched and wrote a guest column about rain shut-off devices for the Naples Daily News. The BCBMIL staff met with Collier County officials to initiate a demonstration project that will evaluate the irrigation systems at County parks and road medians irrigated with re-use water. · The BCBMIL staff appeared before the Big Cypress Basin Board to present a progress report on the MIL program. ~ ~ ~~ ooo o~~ 1 Key to Table Problems 1. Undersized pump for number and type of sprinkler heads 2. Undersized pipe creating excessive friction losses 3. Higher pressure than manufacturer's specifications 4. Lower pressure than manufacturer's specifications 5. Low system pressure due to water supply 6. Different pressures between manifolds. 7. Poor emitter orifice uniformity 8. Poor overlap, improper sprinkler/emitter spacing 9. Small wetted area 10. Pressure loss due to inadequate pipe size 11. Application rate > soil infiltration rate (ponding) 12. Air in lines 13. Turf and landscape area irrigated in the same zone 14. Pressure variation due to elevation differences 15. Mixed sprinklers/emitters - precipitation not matched 16. Mixed sprinkler/emitter brands or types in same zone 17. Various riser heights in same zone 18. Missing/malfunctioning emitters or sprinklers 19. Missing/malfunctioning pressure gauge, regulator, valves 20. Leaks in pipes, laterals, tubes, emitters/sprinklers 21. Clogged filter 16J 22. Missing/broken emitters/sprinklers 23. Sprinkler overflow 24. Clogged emitters/sprinklers 25. Stream of water blocked by vegetation 26. Variable crop spacing 27. Poor drainage, requiring water control 28. System used for frost protection only 29. Operating time too long 30. Operating time too short 31. No rain shut-off device 32. No soil moisture measuring device Follow-up Requirements 1. Not necessary. 2. Review and evaluate recommendations through computer modeling. Document changes implemented by cooperator. A redesign may be needed in accordance with NRCS standards and specifications. 3. Re-evaluate system in the field after recommendations have been implemented. ** Follow-up re-evaluation. Soil Type (Urban) CS Coarse Sand S Sand FS Fine Sand VFS Very Fine Sand NOTE: Evaluation and/or design may involve private consultants in cooperation with USDA-NRCS. 1 Naples Heritage Community Development District September 6, 2002 10300 N. W. 11th Manor * Coral Springs, Florida 33071 Telephone: 954-753-0380 * Fax: 954-755-6701 James Carter Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 SEP - 9 2ou Board of Couni:j Comtaissioner:~ Clerk of Circuit Court - Finance Department c/o Derrick Johnssen 2671 Airport Road, Court Plaza III Post Office Box 413016 Naples, FL 34112-3016 Re: Meeting Dates for Fiscal Year 2003 Dear Mr. Carter and Mr. Johnssen: In accordance with Chapter 189 Florida Statutes we are required to provide to you at the beginning of each fiscal year a notice of our public meeting schedule and a District map. Enclosed is a copy of the District map and the Board of Supervisors of the Naples Heritage Community Development District will hold their meetings for fiscal year 2003 at the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Clubhouse, 8150 Heritage Club Way, Naples, Florida at 9:00 a.m. on the second Monday of the months which follow: October 14, 2002 January 13, 2003 March 10, 2003 May 12, 2003 June 9, 2003 July 14, 2003 If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Gary L. Moyer Manager GLM/tj Enclosure ~.~,. CoTTes: Copies N.T.S. FLORIDA GULF OF HEX~CO COLLIER COUNTY 1:{ 25 E R26 E OOLDEN .'2 GAT~ R 25 E. R 26 E Di!INOTES AREA INCLUDED IN NAPLES H~/TAGB C.D.D. MEMORANDUM 16J I Misc. Correspondence Agenda IDate I Agenda tem# TO: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners FROM: Derek Johnssen, General Accounting Manager Clerk of the Circuit Court/Finance Department DATE: RE: September 23, 2002 Miscellaneous Correspondence - BCC Agenda Please place the following items on the next available BCC agenda and call me at extension 8350 with the date and Miscellaneous Correspondence agenda item number. FIDDLER'~ CREEK COMMIJNTIY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 1. Pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapters 189 and 190, Fiddler's District, has submitted the following: (a) (b) Minutes of Meeting July 24,2002 Unaudited Financial Statements dated 06/30/02 Creek Community Development Thank you :\special\special Fiddler's Creek Community Development District 10300 N.W. 11th Manor · Coral Springs, Florida 33071 Telephone: (954) 753-0380 · Fax: (954) 755-6701 16J Date: September 12, 2002 Memo: Clerk of the Circuit Court Finance Depart. c/o Derrick Johnssen 2671 Airport Rd. Court Plaza III P.O. Box 413016 Naples, FL 34112-3016 Robert Fernandez Collier County Manager Governmental Center 3301 East Tamiami Trail Administrative Bldg., 2nd Fl. Naples, FL 34112 Anthony Pires, Esq. Woodward, Pires & Lombardo 3200 Tamiami Trail North, #200 Naples, FL 34103-4108 Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz One Southeast 3rd, 10th Fl. Miami, FL 33131 From: Gary L. Moyer District Manager RE: Minutes of meeting held on July 24, 2002 Approved on August 28, 2002 Enclosed for your records is a copy of the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District, which are to be kept on file for public access. GLM/swl MINUTES OF MEETING FIDDI,ER'S CB.EE~K COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 16J The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Fiddler's Creek Community Development District was held Wednesday, July 24, 2002 at 10:15 a.m. at the Club and Spa at Fiddler's Creek, 3470 Club Center Boulevard, Naples, Florida. Present and constituting a quorum were: Paul Riegelhaupt Arthur Woodward Grady Minor Chairman Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Also present were: James P. Ward Anthony Pires Frank Feeney C. Sam Kissinger Brian Lamb District Manager District Attorney Hole Montes, Project Engineer District Staff District Staff FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS Roll Call Mr. Kissinger called the meeting to order and called the roll. SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS Approval of the Minutes of the June 26, 2002 Meeting Mr. Kissinger stated each Board member had received a copy of the minutes of the June 26, 2002 meeting and requested any additions, corrections or deletions. There not being any, [On MOTION by Mr. Minor seconded by Mr. Woodward [with all in favor the minutes of the June 26, 2002 [meeting were approved. THIHD ORDER OF BUSINESS Mr. Riegelhaupt asked did you discussed at the last meeting? Mr. Ward responded yes. Questions and Comments on the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2003 make the changes to the budget we July 24, 2002 Fiddler's Crlk C.D.D. FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Staff Reports A. Attorney Mr. Pires stated we are still working on the agreement with the County for the irrigation water and will bring it to the Board when it is finalized. Mr. Minor asked are we now paying full retail rates for all the water we use? Mr. Ward responded yes. Mr. Minor asked does next year's budget reflect the worst case scenario if we have to pay retail rates all year? Mr. Ward responded we are prepared for the worst case scenario. Woodward asked what is our alternative water supply? Pires responded converting the farm well water to irrigation use. Woodward asked do you have any idea when that can take place? Pires responded it is being reviewed. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. B. Engineer Mr. Feeney stated the work continues on the extension for the Parkway heading north. C. Manager - Repor on Number of Registered Voters - 318 Mr. V~rard stated when you reach 250 qualified electors and six years from the date of establishment of the District you begin to transition the Board from a "landowner" based election to a "qualified" elector based election. At that point, individuals living within Fiddler's Creek and registered to vote in Collier County, will begin that process. Three of the seats are up this coming November; Mr. Minor, Mr. Olson and Mr. Ruberto's seats. One of those three seats will be filled by a Landowner's Election; the other two are by qualified elector. We were just notified that the number of registered voter's within Fiddler's Creek is 318, which triggers the qualified elector based election. Unfortunately, the qualifying period happens to be this week, from Monday noon through Friday at noon. Mr. Pires prepared a resolution calling for this election at the General Election on November 5, 2002. One seat will be a four year term, the other seat will be a two year term and the third seat will be filled at a landowner's based election for a four year term. The resolution will be transmitted to the Supervisor of Elections in Collier County within the hour. We already called Ms. Edwards to advise her it is July 24, 2002 Fiddler's Creek C.D.D. coming and asked her to open that seat up for qualification before this week and hopefully, we will get two individuals who qualify by then. Staff is asking you to adopt this resolution in order to have the election this coming November. In the event no one qualifies before Friday at noon, we will ask the Supervisor of Elections to hold the book open for a longer period of time, at her discretion, in order to get two individuals who are qualified electors to run for those two seats. Mr. Minor asked is one seat automatically going to a resident of Fiddler's Creek? Mr. Ward responded two seats, and the third seat will be filled at a landowner based election. That can be an individual who lives within Fiddler's Creek, but only property owners within Fiddler's Creek will vote at the landowner's election. Mr. Riegelhaupt asked can I interject the issue of Mr. Ruberto, who is a resident and his seat is up for re-election? Mr. Ward responded his seat is up in November of this year. If he wants to qualify before Friday at noon, he will be able to run for the Board again, but I am not sure he qualifies. Mr. Riegelhaupt stated I think we should assume he does not qualify. IOn MOTION by Mr. Riegelhaupt seconded by Mr. Minorll liwith all in favor Resolution 2002-8 Regarding thell liElection of Two (2) Supervisors at the General Election libe held in November 2002 was adopted. Financial Statements · Mr. Riegelhaupt asked what do these negative numbers mean on the Financial Statement? On page one, under the amount Due from Debt Service Fund it shows a negative $4,344.42, and also under Capital's Unreserved Fund Balance it shows a negative $17,241.12. Mr. Ward responded when there is a negative number in an asset account and it says "due from," it means that fund owes the Debt Service Fund $4,344.12. It can either be shown as a negative number there, or be shown as a positive number in the liabilities section saying "due to." The "Unreserved Fund Balance" negative number means you started your fiscal year in a negative cash position. Mr. Riegelhaupt asked what about the second part of the question? July 24, 2002 Fiddler's Cr~k ~D~. Mr. Ward responded in Fiddler's Creek's instance it does not mean anything. It is not good to continue to carry a negative cash balance, but I suspect by the end of this fiscal year you will have sufficient cash for that not to occur. It can become very significant if those balances begin to creep up in negative numbers, but the number is so low on a $1.7 million dollar budget that it is not significant at this point. Mr. Riegelhaupt stated this is where I disagree with you. It seems to me that we need a page that explains these negative numbers and what, to your knowledge, they are caused by. This is the only way that the Board of Supervisors will know what is going on financially in this District. This is normally done in engineering budgets and other types of budgets, but if anyone were to ask me what this means right now, I could not begin to tell them. Mr. Ward stated I do not have a problem doing that, but sometimes I am not sure I have an understanding of what people think is important and what is not. When I look at them, there is nothing significant to report. I would not explain why there is a negative number due from a Debt Service Fund, because as an accountant it means that fund owes the Debt Service Fund. Mr. Riegelhaupt stated except when it shows up on an audit at the end of the year showing Fiddler's Creek has a deficit of so many dollars; even though it is a small amount it does not look good. As you noticed in our last audit it was brought to the attention of the Supervisors. Mr. Ward stated that is the same number and is why it is there. Mr. Riegelhaupt stated I just think items over $10,000 should be explained. An item of $4,000, perhaps not, but anything over a specific number should be explained. Let us say that we have a negative number somewhere in these financial reports that is over $100,000, it makes sense to give us a status report of that item. I am trying to find at which level it will disturb you, the Manager of the District. Will you consider this issue and tell us what you think at the next meeting? Mr. Ward responded I will look into it. Mr. Woodward asked on page three of the expense report where insurance is budgeted at $12,000, which is over 255%; who makes the estimates for these budget amounts? Mr. Ward stated I am responsible at the end of the day for making the estimates, but to answer your question, when these budgets were done in May, June and July of last year it was pre-September 11th. Those were the estimates of 4 what we thought were going to be real; it is completely different post September 11th. We had two carriers pull out of the Florida market that provide insurance to municipal agencies and the premiums have gone up dramatically with respect to that. Mr. Woodward asked on page 5 and 6, contracts for repairs and maintenance is up 215%; why are so many items going up? Mr. Ward stated if you go back to the General Fund on page one, under the Revenue and Expense Statement for the month of June, it shows we have a budget of $1.7 million and that we received total revenues of $1.4 million year to date. That might be a little low at this point, but I see that we are at 100% of budget for purposes of the assessment levy. That means that everybody in Fiddler's Creek who was billed on the tax bill has paid their assessment, so we do not have any outstanding issues with tax certificates being sold. If you look at the line below, the Developer's Assessments, which are off-roll and billed on a monthly basis, it is right about where it should be for the month of June. This tells you that by September you will have collected all the revenues you anticipated to receive during the fiscal year for purposes of your budget and that you will not have any real big revenue issues to deal with. That is a good thing, which is what I look at every single month beginning in January. Let me go over each line item as I read them. Professional and Administrative at $93,000 on a $100,000 budget at 93%. This is high as of the month of June, but look at what it is composed of; insurance, which we know why that is being raised; the property appraiser's fees came in slightly over what they should have been for the year, but I know it is completely billed at this point. Legal Fees at $11,000 on a $6,000 budget at 189%. This is because of all the discussions we had with the County these past few months with respect to the water and sewer issue. Two of the three major line items that are causing us to be at 93% of budget at this point in time are fully paid for, and I know I am going to have to watch our legal bill for the balance of the year. Landscaping Maintenance at $425,000 on a $712,000 budget at 59%. No problems, right on target. Access Control at $218,000 on a $397,000 budget at 55%. Right on target, no problems as of the end of June. 5 July 24, 2002 Fiddler's Creek C.D.D. Lighting Services at $24,000 on a $32,000 budget at 74%. Slightly h~h~but1 on a $1.7 million dollar budget it is not material at this time, and there is nothing we can do between ,July 1 and September 80 that will make that big of a difference. Roadway Services at $10,000 on a $215,000 budget at 43%. No problems. Water Management Services at $77,000 on a $108,000 budget at 715%. Somewhat high going into the summer months, but it is warranted at this time and we will be slightly over the $10:3,000; but on a $1.7 million budget, so far I do not have a problem. Contingencies have nothing on a $10,000 budget. That is a good thing. Field Management at $17,000 on a $:36,000 budget at 40%. No problems. Irrigation Services at $205,000 on a $207,000 budget at 60%. I know I have a problem here because of the rate increase. We are probably going to be about $100,000 over on this line item, so that is good at this point. Total Fund Revenues at $1,:3150,000 on a $1,722,000 budget at 78%. Knowing we just looked at it, and knowing we are going to hit the full $1.7 million and that we are at $1,074,000 on a $1,722,000 budget at 62%, and that I have $17,000 to make up from the prior year and a little bit to make up with respect to the irrigation water; we ought to come in very close to the $1,722,000 by year end and should be right on target. When I look at a set of financials every month, that is how I read them. If I want to look a little deeper than that level because I think we are going to go over the $1.7 million budget, I go a little deeper. At this point, the only issue that really concerns me is what the irrigation bills are going to be coming in between ,July 1 and September :30th. There is nothing in the General Fund financials that warrant me to say there is a problem. Do I know we are going to be perfect? No, I do not know we are going to be perfect, but at the end of the day, no one anticipated the water rates going from 1:3 cents a thousand to 615 cents a thousand; however, it is being watched closely through the balance of the year. Mr. Riegelhaupt stated on the 1006 Capital Projects :301 account is a System Fund Balance of negative $150,768.:34, which is roughly 215% of the Unreserved Fund Balance. Mr. Ward stated you want that in a Capital Projects Fund. It means you are spending your capital dollars and reducing the amount of money you have in cash for ongoing projects. Of the $218,000 it had at the beginning of the year, the July 24, 2002 Fiddler's C]lek6C 3.D.1 developer submitted requisitions to pay about $50,000, leaving roughly $167,000 to be spent in that project fund. Mr. Riegelhaupt asked does this represent an unpaid bill? Mr. Ward responded it represents bills that have been paid leaving $167,000 in the account, to which the developer can utilize and submit requisitions to the District to fund infrastructure from the 1996 Capital Projects account. Mr. Riegelhaupt asked what would happen if someone overspent $50,000 in this fund? Mr. Ward responded that is not possible in a Capital Projects Fund because the engineer has the responsibility to ensure that it does not happen. When he signs off on a requisition and tells me it is in accordance with the project budget and budgeted correctly, and is not over that budget, I then pay the bill. In the event he did that in error, it is a breach of fiduciary responsibility from the engineer with respect to that issue. I can tell you in all the years I have been in this business it just never happens. Mr. Riegelhaupt stated in the real world it does, and then you tell your client at the end of the year they overspent $100 million on a power plant saying, "sorry, but that is what you are going to have to spend." We do not want that to happen here. Mr. Ward stated that is why we watch these numbers closely at this level of detail. Even on behalf of Gulf Bay, Mr. Strain pays a lot of attention to that issue on a detailed level basis. He and I talk relatively frequently and if he foresees some sort of a problem, like you just mentioned, I deal with it and bring it back to the Board. In all my years, it just has not happened. Mr. Riegelhaupt stated I certainly feel much better hearing that. FIFrH ORDER OF BUSINESS Supervisor's Requests and Audience Comments Mr. Minor asked am I clear that after the November election Mr. Olson and I are not on the Board any more? Mr. Ward responded three seats will be open, yours, Mr. Olson's and Mr. Ruberto's, unless one of you are elected by the landowners to a four year term. One seat is filled at a landowner based election. The way in which that election works is that the District will advertise for an election, it is called a landowner's election, to be held at Fiddler's Creek. 7 July 24, 2002 Fiddler's Creek C.D.D. n6d4w The people who show up with a proxy, or live in Fiddler's Creek property in Fiddler's Creek, are entitled to vote the number of units or votes that they have. For example, if Gulf Bay owns 1500 acres of undeveloped land, they get 1500 votes; if they own a platted single family sub-division that has 200 units in it, they get 200 votes. If Mr. Riegelhaupt bought a condominium and a Declaration of Condominiums was been filed with 150 units in it, and he owns all of them, he gets 150 votes; and that is only for one Board seat. Who ever shows up at that landowners election will vote those numbers of units. The other two seats will be on the November ballot, and whoever goes out to the precinct and votes for the County Commissioner, there will be a little slot on the voting ballot for Fiddler's Creek. You then go down to the precinct in Fiddler's Creek and vote for those two Board seats. Mr. Riegelhaupt asked can they vote for a non-resident? Mr. Pires responded not for those two seats. Mr. Riegelhaupt asked can a resident vote for a non-resident? Mr. Ward responded the two members who are going to be on the ballot must live in Fiddler's Creek and be registered to vote in Collier County, and this must be your primary place of residence. SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment On MOTION by Mr. Woodward seconded by Mr. Minor[[ with all in favor the meeting adjourned at 10:45 a.m. [[ Grady Minor, Assistant Secretary egelhaup~airman 8 Wednesday July 24, 2OO2 10:00 A.M. 1. 2. 3. 4. AGENDA FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Club & Spa at Fiddler's Creek 3470 Club Center Boulevard Naples, Florida Roll Call Approval of the Minutes of the June 26, 2002 Meeting Questions and Comments on the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2003 Staff Reports A. Attorney B. Engineer C. Manager - Financial Statements Supervisor's Requests and Audience Comments Adjournment NOTE TO A!~lJ MEETING ATTE~EES: Please identify yourself each time you speak to facilitate transcription of meeting minute~ Thank you for your assistance. NapLes Daily News NapLes/ FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News F[DDLER'S CREEK COHHUNITY DEV. DISTRICT - GARY HOYER 210 N UNIVERSITY DR #301 CORAL SPRINGS FL 33071 REFERENCE: 052301 58489574 Notice Of ~eeting Fi State of FLorida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier ~ounty, FLorida, each day and has been entered a~second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pubL~ction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 07/17 AD SPACE: 74.000 INCH FILED ON: 07/17/02 Signature of Affiant Suorn to and Subscribed Personally knoun by me Donna Chesney My Commission DD056336 E~pires Septem~r 11, 2005 :bY Any!~erso~: reqPir!ng df this m~:: ~Use of o .disebi!~V or~ [mp. ajr~ent shauld-con: mc~ the DbtrlCt Office m five cal~ !~ prlor fore me,no: EaCh: ~ Who decid- es to al~,eal any action wltl need a record ~:the proce~gs Land, that eccordlngf~ en~vYe~dm~r :~re · VL~n record ~ the procoedln~s Is me_de, in. cludlng fhe tesflmonv and e~ldence ul~n whlch ~aPP.col is fo be ~L. ~OVer . JUleP ~ No 2064R~J FROM : ELECTIONS OFFICE Date 7/24/2002 'lime 08:46 AM District ~ DisTkt'l'ype_Description_ ALL i Collier County FAX NO. : 941-774-9468 Jul. 24 2002 88:03AM Jennifer J Edwards 1 6J 1 Supervisor of Elections District List Report Rcgistered Voters Inactive voters To~al Demi Rep.~ NPA Other Total Dems R.eps NBA 135.593 32,044 76,030 23.056 4.463 16,514 4,599 7,648 3,614 135,593 32,044 76,030 23,056 4`463 16,514 4,599 7,648 3,614 Collier County O~h~r 653 653 CC 1 1st County Corrm~sionerDist 27,536 6,394 15,564 4,573 1,005 3,875 t,07g !,910 756 ]31 CC 2 2ndCounty C~rnlssioncr Dist 33,201 6,739 19,936 5,513 1,013 3,492 823 1,762 757 150 CC 3 3rd Cotmty Commissioner bist 28,078 7,095 14,998 5,023 962 2,941 803 1,285 724 129 CC 4 4th County Com. miss/oner Dist 28,063 5,788 17,228 4,232 815 4,094 1,124 1,967 837 I66 CC 5 5th Cotmty Commissio,~erDist 18,715 6,028 8,304 3,715 668 2, I12 771 724 540 77 135,593 32,044 76,030 23,056 4,463 16,514 4,599 %648 3,614 653 CD I po~ Of TI~ Islands C D D 306 56 188 43 19 22 11 7 3 1 CD 2 Key Marco C D D 16 4 10 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 CD 3 Lely P, esort C D D 703 1 l0 472 98 23 45 13 16 16 0 CD 4 Pelican Marsh C D D 1.512 232 1.020 225 35 57 16 29 9 3 CD 5 Heritage Greens CDD 379 103 203 63 10 10 0 7 2 1 CD 6 Fiddler's Creek C D D 318 60 184 56 15 8 2 4 2 0 CD 7 Naples I-Ieri~age C.D.D. 426 78 250 76 22 16 3 8 5 0 CD $ Cedar Hammock CDD 143 32 82 24 5 3 0 3 0 0 CD 9 Mediterra South CDD 39 3 30 6 0 1 0 0 t 0 3,842 678 2,439 592 133 162 45 74 38 ~ CNG 1414thU.S. CoagressioaalDist 109,610 23,759 64,544 17,725 3,582 13,088 3,404 6.457 2,708 519 CNG 25 25fl~U.S. Congres~'ionalD/st 25.983 8,285 11,456 5.331 881 3,426 1,195 1,191 906 134 135,593 32.044 76,030 23.056 4,463 16,514 4,599 7,645 3,614 653 CTY I Naples 14,084 2,469 9,419 1,842 354 1,835 466 975 326 68 CTY 2 Everglades City 268 79 130 50 9 38 13 14 7 4 CTY 3 Marco Island 10,205 1,771 6.437 1.629 368 1,555 333 884 284 54 24,557 4319 15,986 3521 731 3,428 812 1,873 617 126 FD I Naples Fire Department 14,084 2,469 9,419 1,g42 354 1,835 466 975 326 68 FD 2 Big Corkscrew Island Fire Dept 3,642 974 1,664 855 149 208 68 81 47 12 FD 4 EastNaples Fire Department 30,397 8,362 15,674 5,221 1.140 4,437 1,396 1,908 959 174 FD 5 Golden Gate FireDepartmeat 23,634 6,439 11,789 4,580 826 2,644 768 1,086 678 112 FD 6 Immokalee Fire Department 3.515 1,917 766 739 93 787 375 164 232 16 VD 8 North Naples Fire Department 47.943 9,560 29,128 7,810 1,445 4,755 1,109 2.420 1,025 201 123,215 29,721 68,440 21,047 4,007 14,666 4.182 6,634 3,267 58J HSE 75 751h Florida House D/strict 10.295 2347 5,757 1,820 371 1,314 332 632 292 58 HSE 76 76th Florida House District 83,077 1%540 49,770 13,121 2,646 10,430 2,748 5,[65 2,106 411 HSE 77 771h Florida Flousc District 1,373 669 359 311 34 270 116 64 80 10 FISE 101 101st Florida}louse District 35,523 9.665 17,93I 6,685 1,242 3,568 1,097 1,454 890 127 HSE 112 l12/h Florida House District 5,325 1,823 2,213 1,119 170 932 306 333 246 47 135,593 32.044 76,030 23,056 4,463 16,514 4,599 7,648 3,614 653 MQ l MosquitoCon~olDislzict I27,g94 29,00I 73,372 21,415 4,206 15,363 4,111 7,344 3,293 615 127,994 29,001 73,372 21.415 4,206 15,363 4,111 7,344 3,293 PaCe 1 JgL 24 2002 08:58 941 774 9468 PaGE.al RESOLUTION NUMBER 2002- o8 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REGARDING THE ELECTION OF TWO (2) SUPERVISORS AT THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN NOVEMBER, 2002 Whereas, the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District, a community' de~,elopment district, was established in 1996 by Chapter 42X, Florida Administrative Code by the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes; and, Whereas, pursuant to the provisions of Section 190.006, Florida Statutes, six (6) years after the initial appointment of members of the board of supervisors of said district, if there are at least 250 qualified electors in the district, the position of two members whose term are expiring shall be filled by qualified electors of the district, elected by the qualified electors of the district, one of the board members who shall serve a two (2) year term and one of the board members whom shall serve a four (4) year term; and Whereas, the seat numbers and length of term thereof are: Seat number I for a term of four (4) years, Seat number 3 for a term of two (2) years; and above Whereas, the District .Manager and District Counsel have communicated to the Supervisor of Elections of Collier County, Florida; and Whereas, said election will be held on the 5t~ day of November, 2002: the NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, that: SECTION ONE 1. The communications of the District Manager and District Counsel to the Supervisor of Elections concerning the holding of an election in the County of Collier, State of Florida, to be held on the 5th day of November, 2002, as required by the provisions of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, for the purpose of having all of the qualified electors residing within the boundaries of the Fiddler's Creek Community Development District to determine two (2) members as aforesaid to serve on the Board of Supervisors of said district are hereby confirmed, and: ::ODMA\PCDOCS\MOYER\2024~1 16J A. The Board recognizes said election shall be conducted according to the requirements of law governing community development districts, as provided in Chapter 190, Florida Statutes. B. The Board recognizes the election shall be held at the precinct polling places heretofore designated by the Supervisor of Elections in Collier County, Florida. The Board recognizes that the polls shall be opened and closed as provided by law and shall contain the candidates to be voted upon in said election. C. The publication of notice of election shall be had in a newspaper of general circulation within said district and the first date of publication shall be at least 30 days prior to the day of November 5~, 2002. The publication shall be made at least twice; once in the fifth week and once in the third week prior to the week in which the election is to be held and the Board shall arrange for said publication. SECTION TWO The period of qualifying as candidate for Supervisor to said district shall be from noon July 22, 2002 to noon July 26, 2002. SECTION THREE Said election shall be conducted according to the requirements of general law and law governing special district elections. DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24 day of July , 2002. ATTEST: Secretary, Grady Minor BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE FIDDLER'S CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT By: Chairman, Pau~glehaupt :: ODMA\PCDOCS\MOYER~2024\I 16J 1~ 16J 1 ~ o ~D O~ O D~ ~Z , U r.4 ~ ,¥: 0 ",0oI g~oo~goo ~ g ~D ~>~ S 4~ r! ~ r~ ~ 0 ~> Z ~OOZ ~ ~Z O~mm~O~ ~O~mO~ ~ZZ~m~M 16J 0 o%0 Z 0 r-.z 0 ~r.. 0 0000000000000000000000 0 0000000000000000000000 0 16J r,~ ¢' 0 0 ~ r.,, ~> ooooo Z Z 16J 0 0 16J 11 0 ~lH 16J 11 4~ r' ~ 0 0 U ~ H 0 C~ CD 0 0 0 Z Z 121 0 0 16J ~ o z z r,~ Z - z r..9 ~ rD 16J 1 ~o ~ 0 0 ~> ~.J 0 ~J U Z ~ ~H Z [~1 H Z 0 o o Z Z 0 U Z Z 0 {.9 © 16J ~ ~ 0 > ~ Z ~ ~ Z ~ Z~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z OD~O~ ~ 88888°°oo 16J ~J U 121 U Z 0 ~9 C~ 0 16J 1,~ 0 o o o o o° o° ~ S 16J 16J Z :~Zn n~ 0 ~q r~ H ~0 r,. 0 C~ oo°°§~°~§~ooo Z > Z m c~ 4J'cI rs} ~ ~ 0 :> oo 0000000 0000000 Z 0 16J 16J ~ 0 0 0 o~oo~ ~ ~g~ ~ g ggggggg~ggggggg ~ 5 ~ 0 Z H ~ 0 ~ ~ U ~ ~0~ H~O~U~ ~ ZZ~ ~ ggggggggg~g 0 16J Z U ~o U~ ~.o ~Jo c' 0 0 c~ :> C~ §§8oooo88§oooo 8 0 ~UUUUU~mO Z U r~ r. rl 121 ~oooo~oo~oooo ~ o ~ ooo oo~oooo o~ooo oooo oo 16J lbJ Z U r~ t'~ r~ m o i ~0 000000000 000000000 ~ZU ~Z rDmu rDD~ o o o o o o U > ~J Z O 'ID ¢' 0 r~l~, 0 (ur,. r'" :> Z 16J 1! o3'0 ~ 0 0 ~> n~ o o o o g o 1'1 16J ~: 0 0 H n, 0 ~ n 0 r,] r.~ H © r~l ID c~ Z o o o o o 16J ,-. ~:) ~0 El 0 0 n-: n Z U 0 SSSoo oo ooooo o S o o o o o o © 0 16J :1. I 16J 0 a5 o 121 M U U 0 U U ~H~O H~ U ~O~m~UU O0 HZZ 00~ UU~HH Z~ O~ O~ U Z ~q Z Z 4-1 0 U U 121 0 E~ H ~U ~"Z Z~ O~ U Z~ O0 O0 UU Z ZZ ZZ 0 U U d E~ U 0 E~ H O ~0 m ~0 ~U ~ 0~0 ~ZU~ 00~0 UU~ o o o X E~ 0 E~ 1 16J 1 ,~ o c~ o H Z c~ Z~ Z~ O0 O0 mZ 16J 1~ 16J 1 0 ~> U 0 U o o O0~U ~0 ~OH ~U 0~ 00~0 U~ X 0 Z > 0 Z o o o 0 15J 1 Fiddler's Creek Community Development District Series 1996 Special Assessment Bonds For the Month Ended June 30, 2002 Source of Funds Construction Year to Projects Date Amounts Overall Paid/Rec'd by Variance Budget Bond Funds (Fay.) - Unfav. Deposit to Construction Account Deposit to Cost of Issuance Account Deposit to Capitalized Interest Account Deposit to Debt Service Reserve Account Costs of Issuance & Underwriters' Discount Interest from Cost of Issuance Account Interest from Construction Account (includes accrued interest) i'otal sources Use of Funds Costs Of Issuance Bond Counsel- White & Case District Counsel- Woodward, Pires et al Trustee Counsel- Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson Financial Consultant- Fishkind & Associates Costs of Issuance & Underwriters' Discount District Manager- Moyer & Associates Deposit to Capitalized Interest Account Deposit to Reserve Account Document Printing- Allied Printing total costs of issuance $15,100,000.00 $15,100,000.00 $0.00 $151,894.10 $151,894.10 $0.00 $2,701,580.90 $2,701,580.90 $0.00 $1,953,375.00 $1,953,375.00 $0.00 $303,150.00 $303,150.00 $0.00 $988.04 $988.04 $0.00 $659,018.20 $659,018.20 $0.00 $20,870,006.24 $20,870,006.24 $0.00 Construction Year to Projects Date Amounts Overall Paid/Rec'd by Variance Budget Bond Funds Fav.- (Unfav.) $101,966.60 $101,966.60 $0.00 $18,032.54 $18,032.54 $0.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 $26,541.98 $26,541.98 $0.00 $345,254.17 $345,254.17 $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $2,701,580.90 $2,701,580.90 $0.00 $1,953,375.00 $1,953,375.00 $0.00 $1,676.00 $1,676.00 $0.00 $5,163,427.19 $5,163,427.19 $0.00 Fiddler's Creek Community Development District Series 1996 Special Assessment Bonds 16J Construction Costs Transferred Improvements Construction Projects Overall Budget Year to Date Amounts Paid/Rec'd by Variance Bond Funds Fay. - (Unfav.) Roadway Utilities - Water/Sewer/Irrigation Earthwork & Clearing Stormwater Management Roadway Lighting Landscaping Recreation, Parks & Security Offsite Improvements total transferred improvements $163,019.67 $439,353.51 $2,519,567.53 $229,760.71 $83,111.67 $573,001.49 $131,230.63 $228,181.97 $163,019.67 $0.00 $439,353.51 $0.00 $2,519,567.53 $0.00 $229,760.71 $0.00 $83,111.67 $0.00 $573,001.49 $0.00 $131,230.63 $0.00 $228,181.97 $0.00 $4,367,227.18 $4,367,227.18 $0.00 Soft Costs Hole, Montes & Associates George Botner ASLA White & Case - (work for refunding 1996 bonds) 951 Land Holdings JV - Management Fee Law Engineering - Geotechnical total soft costs $479,320.84 $479,320.84 $10,249.08 $10,249.08 $18,963.50 $18,963.50 $440,327.68 $440,327.68 $2,930.01 $2,930.01 $951,791.11 $951,791.11 $0.00 $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $0.00 Phase IA Soft Costs Roadways Water Mains Sewer Mains Irrigation Mains Drainage Excavation Security Landscape Signage Guymann Construction 200000 $4,536.09 $4,536.09 302000 $44,606.85 $44,606.85 302320 $0.00 $0.00 303315 $0.00 $0.00 303340 $1,850.00 $1,850.00 304000 $0.00 $0.00 306600 $2,000.00 SZ000.00 308820 $113,809.60 $113,809.60 308840 $563,096.52 $563,096.52 308860 $60,895.16 $60,895.16 Various $811,063.03 $811,063.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo total Phase lA $1,601,857.25 $1,601,857.25 $0.00 Construction Costs Phase IB Soft Costs Roadways Water Mains Sewer Mains Irrigation Mains Drainage Excavation Security Landscape Signage Guymann Construction Phase 2 Soft Costs Roadways Water Mains Sewer Mains Irrigation Mains Drainage Excavation Security Landscape Signage Guymann Construction Future Projects Fiddler's Creek Community Development District Series 1996 Special Assessment Bonds 16J l! Construction Projects Overall Budget Year to Date Amounts Paid/Rec'd by Variance Bond Funds Fay. - (Unfav.) 200000 302000 302320 303315 303340 304000 306600 308820 308840 308860 Various $72,114.43 $37,427.50 $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $1,200.00 $36,069.78 $95,220.00 $2,200,834.01 $99,867.58 $5,978,481.15 $72,114.43 $0.00 $3Z427.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $0.00 $36,069.78 $0.00 $95,220.00 $0.00 $2,200,834.01 $0.00 $99,867.58 $0.00 $5,978,481.15 $0.00 total Phase lB $8,521,214.45 $8,521,214.45 $0.00 200000 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 302000 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 302320 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 303315 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 303340 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 304000 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 306600 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 308820 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 308840 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 308860 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Various $96,890.67 $96,890.67 $0.00 total Phase 2 $96,890.67 $96,890.67 $0.00 $16Z598.39 $0.00 $16Z598.39 total constntction costs $15,538,980.66 $15,538,980.66 $0.00 total costs overall available remaining funds Balance of Trust Accounts Construction Account Cost of Issuance Account Total $16Z598.39 $16Z598.39 $20,87~006.24 $2~70Z407.85 $16Z598.39 $16Z598.39 Fiddler's Creek Community Development District Series 1999 Special Assessment Revenue Bonds 16J 1 For the Month Ended June 30, 2002 Source of Funds Construction Year to Projects Date Amounts Overall Paid/Rec'd by Variance Budget Bond Funds (Fay.) - Unfav. Deposit to Construction Account Deposit to Cost of Issuance Account Deposit to Capitalized Interest Account Deposit to 1999A Reserve Account Deposit to 1999B Reserve Account Costs of Issuance & Underwriters' Discount Interest Income (including Accrued Interest) total sources $13,589,592.84 $13,589,592.84 $0.00 $175,000.00 . $175,000.00 $0.00 $1,772,584.03 $1,772,584.03 $0.00 $791,231.55 $791,231.55 $0.00 $675,161.58 $675,161.58 $0.00 $241,430.00 $241,430.00 $0.00 $11,190.99 $842,091.30 ($830,900.31) $17,256,190.99 $18,087,091.30 ($830,900.31) Use of Funds Costs of Issuance Deposit to Capitalized Interest Account Deposit to 1999A Reserve Account Deposit to 1999B Reserve Account Bond Counsel- White & Case District Counsel- Woodward, Pires and Lombardo Trustee - Suntrust Bank Trustee Counsel- Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson Financial Consultant- Fishkind & Associates, Inc. Underwriters' Discount District Manager- Severn Trent/Moyer & Assoc. Document Printing- Allied Printing, Inc. Construction Year to Projects Date Amounts Overall Paid/Rec'd by Variance Budget Bond Funds Fav.- (Unfav.) $1,772,584.03 $1,772,584.03 $0.00 $791,231.55 $791,231.55 $0.00 $675,161.58 $675,161.58 $0.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $0.00 $11,075.80 $11,075.80 $0.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 $211,128.51 $211,128.51 $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $4,115.01 $4,115.01 $0.00 total costs of issuance $3,603,796.48 $3,603,796.48 $0.00 Fiddler's Creek Community Development District Series 1999 Special Assessment Bonds 16J Construction Costs General Development Soft Costs Environmental Roadways Tunnels Water Mains Street Lighting Sewer Mains Irrigation Mains Drainage Clearing Excavation Security Fountains Landscape Signage Median Landscape total general development Code Construction Year to Projects Date Amounts Overall Paid/Rec'd by Variance Budget Bond Funds Fay. - (Unfav.) 200000 301000 302000 302215 302320 303300 303315 303340 304000 305000 306600 308820 308810 308840 308860 308880 $941,584.00 $941,695.95 ($111.95) $102,500.00 $121,655.50 ($19,155.50) $485,400.00 $282,278.25 $203,121.75 $175,000.00 $219,747.22 ($44,747.22) $185,614.00 $111,081.32 $74,532.68 $96,150.00 $143,436.00 ($47,286.00) $359,619.00 $325,129.25 $34,489.75 $647,083.00 $63,084.55 $583,998.45 $935,085.00 $891,230.40 $43,854.60 $885,000.00 $565,090.45 $319,909.55 $7,223,806.00 $7,342,933.11 ($119,127.11) $238,160.00 $136,912.30 $101,247.70 $112,400.00 $112,226.90 $173.10 $776,000.00 $608,632.93 $167,367.07 $54,000.00 $22,334.32 $31,665.68 $350,000.00 $332,739.11 $17,260.89 $13,56Z401.00 $12,220,207.56 $1,34Z193.44 Fut~tre Projects $84,993.51 $0.00 $84,993.51 total construction costs $13,56Z401.00 $12,220,207.56 $1,347,193.44 total costs overall $17,256,190.99 $15,824,004.04 $1,432,186.95 available remaining funds $2,26~087.26 Balance of Trust Accounts Construction Account Cost of Issuance Account $2,263,087.26 $0.00 Total $2,26~087.26 Fiddler's Creek Community Development District Series 2002 Spoe]al Assessment Revenue Bonds 16J For the Month Ended June 30, 2002 Source of Funds Construction Year to Projects Date Amounts Overall Paid/Rec'd by Variance Budget Bond Funds (Fay.) - Unfav. Deposit to Construction Account Deposit to Cost of Issuance Account Deposit to Interest Account Deposit to 1999A Reserve Account Deposit to 1999B Reserve Account Costs of Issuance & Underwriters' Discount Interest Income (including Accrued Interest) total sources $12,195,697.18 $12,195,697.18 $0.00 $165,000.00 $165,000.00 $0.00 $1,647,430.94 $1,647,430.94 $0.00 $799,000.01 $799,000.01 $0.00 $411,121.87 $411,121.87 $0.00 $231,750.00 $231,750.00 $0.00 $11,190.99 $41,709.09 ($30,518.10) $15,461,190.99 $15,491,709.09 ($30,518.10) Use of Funds Construction Year to Projects Date Amounts Overall Paid/Rec'd by Variance Budget Bond Funds Fay. - (Unfav.) Costs of Issuance Deposit to Interest Account Deposit to 1999A Reserve Account Deposit to 1999B Reserve Account Bond Counsel- White & Case District Counsel- Woodward, Pires and Lombardo Trustee - Suntrust Bank Trustee Counsel- Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson Financial Consultant- Fishkind & Associates, Inc. Underwriters' Discount District Manager- Severn Trent/Moyer & Assoc. Document Printing- Greenberg & Traurig total costs o/issuance $1,647,430.94 $1,647,430.94 $0.00 $799,000.01 $799,000.01 $0.00 $411,121.87 $411,121.87 $0.00 $90,000.00 $90,000.00 $0.00 $9,470.50 $9,470.50 $0.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $231,750.00 $231,750.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 $3,238,273.32 $3,238,273.32 $0.00 Fiddler's Creek Community Development District Series 2002 Special Assessment Bond~ 16J Construction Costs General Development Soft Costs Environmental Roadways Tunnels Water Mains Street Lighting Sewer Mains Irrigation Mains Drainage Clearing Excavation Security Fountains Landscape Off Site Contingencies - total general development Construction Year to Projects Date Amounts Overall Paid/Rec'd by Variance Budset Bond Funds Fay. - (Unfav.) $1,724,000.00 $169,348.68 $1,554,651.32 $252,000.00 $0.00 $252,000.00 $1,453,000.00 $127,701.66 $1,325,298.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $446,000.00 $0.00 $446,000.00 $151,000.00 $0.00 $151,000.00 $740,000.00 $0.00 $740,000.00 $475,000.00 $46,708.57 $428,291.43 $681,000.00 $10,754.00 $670,246.00 $239,000.00 $23,532.75 $215,467.25 $3,165,000.00 $971,537.73 $2,193,462.27 $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $1,769,000.00 $25,794.00 $1,743,206.00 $100,000.00 $0.00 $100,000.00 $997,000.00 $0.00 $997,000.00 $12,192,000.00 $1,375,377.39 $10,816,622.61 Future Projects $30,917.67 $0.00 $30,917.67 total construction costs $12,192,000.00 $1,375,377.39 $10,816,622.61 total costs overall $15,461,190.99 $4,613,650.71 $10,847,540.28 available remaining funds $10,878,058.38 Balance of Trust Accounts Construction Account Cost of Issuance Account $10,758,084.77 $119,973.61 Total $10,878,058.38 lbJ .ell 121 ~ 0 c~. rD 0 l_6j 0 0 o 0 rtl 0 0 o o ~ o ~,~ ~ o m o ~ 000000 o o o O O O O0 0 O0 :> > U O O0 >> {J {J 0 0 0 o o O0 O0 O0 0 0 {J o o oo o oo o oo oo o oo o oo oo ~ oo ~ ~ oo oo ~ oo ~ ~ oo 000000 0 0 0 O0 0 O0 0 O0 0 O0 O0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ O0 O0 ~ 0 000000 ~ 0 ~ O0 ~ O0 ~ O0 ~ O0 0 0 O o U U 0 0 :> > 0 ~J 16J 0 0 ~l o ~o ~ 0r' ~ o o ~> o o o 0 (.9 16J U r~ r~ 0 0 16J 1 loJ 00000 H 00000~0000- 0 0 0 ,-.4 d oo 0 J~ 16J 1 u {J Q A 0 16J 1 0 ~ ~0 ~ ~ ~ooooo00ooo~~~~ 1 o o o o r~ REGULAISI MEETING September 18, 2002 4:00- 7:00p. m. Loca on: Golden Gate Estates Fire Station 71 All public speakers will be limited to five (5) minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time. 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes 3. Approval of Agenda 4. OldBusiness: · Plan Amendment Proposal By Bob Duane, AICP, Hole, Montes, Inc. · Neighborhood Center Proposal At Golden Gate Boulevard/Collier Boulevard - Bruce Anderson, Young, van Assenderp, Varnadoe & Anderson, P.A., Anita Jenkins, WilsonMiller · Further Discussion of Community Audit - Chuck Mohlke · Neighborhood Centers: Evaluating Options and Deciding on a Course of Action 5. New Business: · · Committee Recommendation on Request By Ed Carlson tofill the vacant Committee position. · · Autumn 2002 Plan Amendment Cycle Schedule 6. Member & Public Comments 7. Set Next Meeting Date (Tentatively Scheduled for October 16, 2002). 8. Adjourn All meetings will be publicly noticed in the W. Harmon Turner Building (Building F), on the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy website (http://co. collier, fi. us/planning/comp_plan/GoMenGateAreaMasterPlanRESTUD Y. htm) posted at the Golden Gate Community Center and Golden Gate Estates Library and provided to the County Public Information Department for distribution. Please call Glenn E. Heath, Principal Planner, at 403-2323 for additional information. ~iSC. Cortes: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons needing assistance to participate in any ~)f these proceedings should contact Glenn E. Heath at least 48 hours before the meeting. 1 thl |6 3- Date: . . Item# ] \ Copies To: 16J Neighborhood Centers: Evaluating Options and Deciding on A Course of Action Background: At its creation in June of 2001, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee was charged with working with the County staff to consider a number of different planning issues with regard to the Greater Golden Gate Area. Among these was the topic of commercial uses. Earlier this year, during a series of workshop meetings, the Committee developed and approved siting criteria for a number of neighborhood commercial centers within Golden Gate Estates. Having established the siting criteria, the Committee worked with County Comprehensive Planning staff to map actual proposed locations for five new or expanded neighborhood centers. The Committee selected the location of each center, sometimes after considerable debate, based on both general and specific considerations. Comprehensive Planning staff believes, therefore, that each proposed neighborhood center requires specific consideration as to its merits and/or disadvantages. We also understand that Committee members may wish to have more deliberation upon the possible impacts of these centers. At the previous meeting, concerning in part the proposed neighborhood commercial center designation at Golden Gate Boulevard and 25th Street, S.W., it quickly became apparent that the normal County notification guidelines were insufficient to reach all residents potentially affected by the neighborhood center locations. At the Committee's request staff has expanded its contact radius for the neighborhood centers. Staff has also requested input from County Transportation staff and the staff of the Collier County School District. Very few comments have as yet been received. However, time is running short. In order to forward the first set of revisions to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan through the local and State review processes, staff will be proposing that October 16 be the last date upon which new amendment language may be considered by the Committee (See scheduling item under "New Business"). Therefore, staff is recommending that the Committee adopt one (or a combination) of the following options: Option #1: Table further discussion of the proposed Neighborhood Community Centers until after initial preparation of the first phase amendments. The Centers would not be part of the amendment language submitted for the autumn, 2002 cycle. The Committee would decide to drop the neighborhood center concept, or move it forward, at a later date. Ootion #2: Delete the proposed center at Golden Gate Boulevard and 25th Street, S.W. from consideration, but forward the remaining centers. Option #3: Delete the proposed center at Golden Gate Boulevard and 25th Street, S.W. from consideration, and table the remaining centers until after finalization of the first phase amendments. Option #4: Delete all centers from consideration at this time. This option does not preclude staff from submitting an alternative commercial uses proposal for Committee consideration at a later date. Nor does it prevent a private party from bringing a commercial proposal to the Committee for consideration. Option #5: Forward all proposed neighborhood centers into the autumn amendment cycle. Option #6: Any other option deemed advisable by the Committee, provided that staff has clear direction regarding the autumn amendment cycle. lOJ 1 Request By Ed Carlson to fill the vacant Committee position Background: Upon the resignation of Kris Thoemke from the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Advisory Committee, the Committee requested Comprehensive Planning staff to determine whether the Committee could remain at nine members instead of the usual slate of 10. The question was raised to County Legal staff, which indicated that the Committee was required to have ten (10) members. Thereupon, Comprehensive Planning staff requested that Board of County Commissioners staff place a public notice calling for interested persons to contact BCC staff regarding the Committee vacancy. To date, there has been one request for appointment to the vacant seat. Mr. Ed Carlson submitted this request. As per the County's requirements, Mr. Carlson has submitted a brief resume, which is included herein. Recently, the County has revised its ad hoc committee appointment procedures, in line with the requirements of a 1994 resolution. Therefore, the Committee must officially recommend approval or disapproval of Mr. Carlson's appointment to the AdVisory Committee and return such recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. The Committee's recommendation must be returned to the BCC within 41 days of the County's memo about the request (or by October 18, 2002). Therefore, the purpose of this agenda item is to request that the Committee take official action on Mr. Carlson's request. MEMORANDUM 16J 1 DATE: TO: FROM: September 9, 2002 Glenn E. Heath, AICP, Principal Planner Planning Services Sue Filson, Executive Manage Board of County Commissioners Golden Gate Area Master Plan Ad Hoc Advisory Committee As you know, we curremly have a vacancy on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows: Ed Carlson 3331 1~t Avenue, N.W. Naples, FL 34120 Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointmem of the advisory committee within the 41 day time-frame, and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at 774-8097. Thank you for your attention to this matter. SF AttaChments AUG. l:lSPM M~TIOM~L AUDUBOM Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiaml Trail Naples, FL 34112 (941) 774-~097 Fax: (941) 774.5602 MO. 398 P. 16J APplication for Advisory Committees/Boards Name: ~" O ~' ~ ~, ~. S. ~:~ ~,; ~me Phone: ~ Are you a regis~rcd voter in Collier County:. Yes ' ~ Do you currently hold public office? Yes lfso~ Wl~t i~ tl~t No No Do you now sm, ye, or have ~ou eveF served, on a Coflier County Imard or commitl~e? Yes X No , , ffy~, pl~so list the cImlta~s/boards: Plense list your eOmmity aetlviti~ (civic clubs, ac'o~hborhood associations, etc~ and posMom ~~ Autumn 2002 Plan Amendment Cycle Schedule Here is the tentative autumn, 2002 Amendment Cycle, with respect to the Phase 1 amendments to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. September 18, 2002: Committee takes action on proposed subdistricts at takes Boulevard/Immokalee Road, Logan Boulevard/Pine Ridge Road and Logan Boulevard/Vanderbilt Beach Boulevard Extension. Committee takes final action on Neighborhood Center locations, or defers this item to the Phase 2 amendments. Committee takes action on the proposed Neighborhood Center at Collier Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard. October 16, 2002: Committee takes action on the proposed conditional use amendment/rezone on Golden Gate Parkway ("Church Amendment"). Committee takes action on the proposed amendments (what to forward, what not to forward). October 30, 2002(tentative): This meeting may either be used to finalize any remaining Phase 1 amendment items, or the Committee may choose to begin work on Phase 2 items. Post-October Meetings: Currently, the Committee is scheduled to meet on the following dates: November 13, 2002 December 11, 2002. Planning Commission (tentative): November 21, 2002. BCC (tentative): December 17, 2002. .,3rter :,-,,::'-?ling IMMO~LEE BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 21, 2002 16J IlL IV. VI. VII. VIII. The meeting was called to order by Sharon Tims, chairman, at 4:45 P.M. ATTENDANCE Sharon Tims, Chairman Collier County: Bob Petersen, DOT Landscape Operations Michael McGee, McGee and Associates, Landscape Architect Robert Kindelan, Commercial Land Management, Landscape Maintenance Committee members: Rita Avalos, Cherryle Thomas APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Notes-not Minutes- of the July 19, 2002, meeting were distributed, additions or corrections to be made if needed. BUDGET: Copies of the Immokalee Beautification MSTU Budget were distributed by Bob Petersen. (Manpower will get copies to absent members.) Bob stated that the revenue is coming in, and the rest will be here soon. A brief discussion followed. Motion was made by Cherryle Thomas and seconded by Sharon Tims that Mike McGee begin work on Phase IIB and Phase III. These projects were presented in the meeting last March. Motion carried. LANDSCAPING WORKSHOP: Bob Petersen gave information on a Landscaping Workshop to be held Sept. 5, 2002, at 2 P.M. in the BBC Chambers. Discussion followed. Cherryle Thomas made the motion that we continue to partner with the county, whereby we do the improvements and the county continues to do the maintenance. Rita Avalos seconded the motion. Motion passed. Bob encouraged attendance at the Sept. 5 workshop and noted that these minutes will be in the packet of materials that the Commissioners will be given for the workshop. ORDINANCE CLARIFICATION: Bob Petersen will meet in September with the BBC to resolve the two-ordinance situation for the existence of the Beautification Committee. An Amended Ordinance would solve the problem. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT: Robert Kindelan reported that the routine work has and is being done--the sweeping, trimming, fertilizing, and second mulching. There are no major irrigation problems at this time. The holly trees have been relocated and new foxglove palms are being planted. The curbs have been painted. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT: Mike McGee reported that the regular drive-through has been done. All looked good except where crashes occurred, and those sites are being fixed as soon as possible. Bids on maintenance will begin at 2:30 tomorrow. The streets will be swept twice as much as before. The 2003 Budget is set and is not an issue at this time. The triangle development seems to be progressing on schedul~'i~tado~3111~ will verify the sign to be put up. Phase II B and III will begin soon. e,~e~:-t~ Date: Copies 16J IX. Xe XI. XII. fix the medians and curbs on 846; bids will be obtained. On 29, repairs will be made after the third bid comes in. OLD BUSINESS: Sharon Tims needs to send an updated resume to Sue Filson. She will do so and state her intent to continue as Chairman of this committee. NEW BUSINESS: Denise Smith's term has been advertised as open in September, as well as Sharon Tims'. The minutes of the meetings have not been received by all committee members. Bob Petersen said he will talk to Susan at Manpower about this because it was not in the original contract. Bob further stated that he would speak to Susan about calling all members to relay the date and time of the next meeting, and he will let Susan know that copies of the Fund 156 report and minutes of this meeting must be sent to Dorcas Howard and to the Board of County Commissioners. Item X in the Notes from the last meeting is to be removed. ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Cherryle Thomas and seconded by Sharon Tims. Motion carried and the meeting was adjourned at 5:10 P.M. The next meeting is scheduled for September 18, 2002, at Immokalee Community Park at 4 P.M. Respectfully submitted by Joyce Martin, temporary secretary. 08/25/2002 11:01 P~GE 81/01 7748301 PUB INFO y NOTICE OF MEETING & AGENDA 1 6 J 1 ! COLLIER COUNTY HISPANIC AFFAIRS ADVISORY BOARD Fiala %/, / _ THURSDAY, AUGUST 29, 2002 Carter ~/ / - 7:00 P.M. Henntng- V C, oyle _ r -- County Commission. Meeting Room Coletta [,/' - Turner Building (Building F), Third FIo~r~ Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 NOTICES ** Public comments will,be limited to 5 minutes unless permission for addi'tiona] time is granted by the Chairman, Collier Coun~ Ordinance No. 9%22 taquires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department- AGENDA I, :7:00 P.M, Meeting called to order and determination of quorum. II, Approval of minutes of tine July 25, 2002 meeting, llI, Determination of excusal of absences. IV. New Business .. ~Requests fi'om School Board candidates Richard Calabrese and Dr. Leo Cardona to address HAAB regarding Collier County School Board/Hispanic issues. Chairman .David Correa introduces Annie Pappalardo of the Collier County .Parks and Recreation Department, to speak to the Board re "Viva Naples Festival". Member Pina comments re: Development of HAAB Rtfles of Procedure 0) (2) (3) (4) (5) Members speaking on behalf of HAAB; Content of ltAAB Agendas; Time limitations for speakers; Promotion of HAAB topics; and Any other procedural matters. Public Comments. Meeting adjourns. Misc. C0rres: Date: ~ CoCes T0: Carter Henning Coyle Coletta AGENDA RECEIVED 8oard of County Commissioners COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2002, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FL 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL BY CLERK ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA - APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 1, 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: CHAIRMAN'S REPORT ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. VA-2002-AR-2392, Gerald A. McHale, Jr., Trustee, Naples Gateway Land Trust, requesting a variance from PUD Ordinance 2000-14, Section IV., 4.13, Landscaping and Buffering, Item (2), which requires a 10-foot wide Type A buffer along the eastern project perimeter boundary, to allow a 2.0-foot wide buffer area along the western edge of the sidewalk adjacent to the north-south portion of the accessway connecting to the Raggae PUD. The subject property is located at 3645 Gateway Lane, further described as Naples Gateway, Phase 2, Lot 6, as recorded in Plat Book 35, page 49, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Kay Deselem) Misc. C0rres: Cautero, AICP, of Wilkison :& Assocr~OI~5, ~t'~l~.~l~ing B. VA-2001-AR- 1205, Vincent A. Shane Alan Mclntosh, requesting a 7-foot variance from the maXimum l~ht reqffir-ement of 35 feet in the C-2 Zoning District to 42 feet and a 41-foot variance from the Corridor Management Copies T0: Co Do Eo Overlay District (CMO) setback from Goodlette-Frank Road of 100 feet (50 feet plus 25 feet for each additional floor) for a proposed 3-story commercial building located on the northeast comer of Goodlette-Frank Road and 13th Avenue North, further described as Section 34, Township 49 South,(coordinator:Range Ray25 Bellows)East' Collier County, Florida. (COMPANION TO {Z'2001~'AR'12104)t.i. ~,~ ..~ ,6 RZ-2001-AR-1204, Vincent A. Cautero, AICP, of Wilkison & Associates, Inc., representing Shane Alan Mclntosh, requesting a rezone from C-1 and RSF-4 to C-2 for general office space for property located on the northeast comer of Goodlette-Frank Road (CR-851) and 13th Avenue North, 1300 Goodlette Road North, in Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (COMPANION TO VA-2001-AR-1205) (Coordinator: Ray Bellows) CU-2002-AR-1943, Golden Gate Seventh Day Adventist Church, requesting a conditional use in the A-MHO zoning district per LDC Section 2.2.2.3.7, to allow a church/place of worship on 4.56+ acres located on the east side of River Road, 500-~-_ south of Immokalee Road in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Kay Deselem) CU-2002-AR-2366, Ron Beaver, requesting a Conditional Use in the "E" Estates zoning district per LDC Section 2.2.3.3.7, to allow a lake excavation on 6.6 acres located at 464031st Avenue NE, further described as Lot 144, Golden Gate Estates Unit 67, in Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Kay Deselem) o 9. 11. 12. 13. OLD BUSINESS: NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC COMMENT ITEMS DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA ADJOURN 9/5/02 CCPC AGENDA/SM-/SP 2 Collier County Planning Commission County Commissioners Boardroom Building F, 3rd Floor 3301 Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34104 MINUTES August 1, 2002 ATTENDANCE Members: Chairman Kenneth Abernathy Frank Frye Paul Midney Russell A. Budd Lindy Adelstein Lora Jean Young David Wolfley Mark Strain Staff: Marjorie Student - Assistant County Attorney, Joe Schmitt - CDES Administrator, Ray Bellows - Planning Services, Kay Deselem - Planning Services Principal Planner Public Speakers: Jim Ogara - petitioner, Janet Powell, Jeffrey Faramo August 1, 2002 16J Mr. Abernathy called the meeting at 8:30 a.m. Called role and asked staff if there were any addenda to the agenda. There were no changes to the agenda. Kenneth Abemathy called on item 8-D. He stated that the item printed on the agenda, but understood that it had been removed and there was a substitution for 8D. Paul Midney stated that 8D is a fast track petition, final order based amendments that was requested by the planning commission to go over timelines. Kenneth Abemathy stated that there was a message from Lori to substitute the language of 8D regarding discussion pf the policy restating procedures for presentation of materials in a timely manner to the planning commission. Says this is not fast track anything, just trying to speed up the beginning Joe Schmitt stated that although it is on the agenda, not prepared to discuss that matter. Can discuss as a commission, but from the staff perspective, have not reviewed. Marjorie reviewed for legal aspects, can discuss from legal perspective unless want to do it together to accommodate staff. Kenneth Abemathy stated that David Weeks was told to take this item back to staff and that it would be on the agenda for the next meeting. Wanted to discuss. Asked whether this fast track business was on the agenda or not. Asked if were prepared. Ray Bellows stated that they were not, so it was scratched form the agenda. Frank Frye wanted to see that his letter that was passed out earlier, to be added to the agenda and discussed at a later time. (referred to as 8E) Mr. Abemathy asked if there were any other addenda. There was no approval of minutes. Went over any upcoming planning commission absences. Mark strain stated he might be absent for the September 5th meeting. Some confusion on date and time of the Eastern Lands meeting for October. Abemathy stated there was some confusion about a message that was supposed to reschedule a BCC meeting, not a CCPC meeting. There was supposed to be an LDC meeting on 10/23 at 5:05 p.m. KA asked if there were still 2 meetings to be held for the LDC. Joe stated ,Come to you w/a proposal if it is a certain amendment it would only require one heating, based on the recommendation going before Board of County Commissioners. Second meeting was going to be abolished, but retreated from that. Joes Schmitt went over schedule on the LDC amendment cycle, which will include the checkbook concurrency LDC amendments. First meeting is Thursday Oct. 17th.8:30, Wednesday October 23rd at 5:05.Following November 13, 5:05. Mark Strain asked about the Eastern Lands meeting and when it would take place. JS stated the LDC workshop also going to use Community Character Smart Growth Committee to go over LDC amendments. JS stated that the Community Smart will have a 2 chance to comment before it comes to the planning commission. Separate session for the input review and comment, which was a suggestion of county manager and board of county commissioner. It' s another panel to add and recommend of approval or disapproval the LDC Amendments. Asking about eastern lands. October 3~t at 8:30. Joe Schmitt stated that the staff would need to get with Sue Filson in order to deconflict the schedule of meeting s for September, October, and November. Abemathy asked if the planning commission could please have a hard copy of the schedule of meeting by the September 5th meeting. Joe sated they would have one ready. Mr. Abemathy asked for any recaps from the BCC report. Ray bellows stated there were several items to go over. First he went over the center point, the ST permit that the planning commission reviewed and approved. Board during meeting to continue item to allow applicant site development plan to show how conform w/community character plan and provide additional landscaping of 41 and 951. He stated he would get back to board by the September 10th meeting, but may have to go at later time if more time is needed for the staff to review. Ray stated that other items are work force housing projects for Cypress Glen and Arrowhead. The board approved both unanimously. Another item was the rezone for James Ogara, Block 168, also approved 4- 1 by the board. Kenneth asked if the board incorporated the planning commissions additional conditions. Ray stated that they did. Mark wanted to confirm that the applicant pulled Heritage Bay. Mr. Abemathy asked if same rational apply, whether setting a minimum square footage for houses and utilities. All were on the recommendation that went before the BCC. Ray stated that the BCC accepted. Joe Schmitt discussed an item regarding Lely Barefoot Beach. He stated that variance was withdrawn and continued at the request of the petitioner as well. Not sure where they were going with that whether there will be a redesign or if they are going to negotiate or compromise with the neighbors. He stated this item would be continued and heard on September l0th with the Board. Mark Strain asked Joe about Manatee Resort, if there was anything new on that. Joe stated that the legal team met. He stated that they are currently trying to work out a legal solution this issue. He stated that the best thing to do for the residents was to get the facility recognized as a condominium and not a condominium hotel. He stated that they are trying to find a solution to legally do so, given the current LDC and both managements plans, in compliance with the county attorney and the applicants legal teams to find a solution. Mark asked if Estuary Towers had been pulled and Joe stated that they were pulled and continued by the applicant as well. Mr. Abemathy has no further chairman report. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 3 8AVA2001-AR- 1710 Greg White, finishing by Baker, representing Jose and Carol Roja, was requesting a 2 V2 foot variance after the fact to the PUD zoning distance from the required 12 foot side yard set back to 9 V2 swimming pool from the enclosure. Mark Strain stated that he had discussions w/staff and county attorneys office about set back site. Frank Frye brought to the boards' attention that he visited the site and the owner was there, but there was no discussion regarding the matter. Mr. Abernathy asked Marjorie Student about x-party disclosures. He stated he never thought communications between commissioners and staff as distinguished from a petitioner or an opponent of the petition, that these were not x party at all. He stated that they received a written report from the staff, which is not x party. He asked if the commissioners call staff and ask a question about it, is this x party communication. Marjorie replied that she has discussed this issue with Mr. Weigel because it can go either way. She stated that according to Mr. Weigel that staff discussion should be disclosed as an x party disclosure. She stated she has had this discussion before and it can go either way, but this was Mr. Weigel's decision. Kay Deselem from the Planning Commission Staff spoke of the staff report from July 10, 2002. She went over where the site was on San Mateo Drive and frontage on South Port Cove. There were attempts to include photos in the report, but they were not too clear. She had more clear ones with her. She showed the enclosure and displayed and discussed the size of screen enclosure and how it relates to the house. She summarized the applicants request for an after the fact variance according to the petition after constructed due to the surveyor error. Staff is recommending approval of the request. Lindy Adelstein asked about the area, and whether the variance was actually a foot or foot and a half. Kay referred to attachment C to show the narrow wedge of a triangle along the back corner. She mentioned how staff referred to the lot as an unusual shape. Kenneth stated the issue is that the surveyor didn't realize there was a problem when they designed it and perhaps they realized they could of made it comply. He stated that at this point it is a small problem. Mark Strain added that they are backing up to lake in a lot of PUD's in that case even accepted to a 0 set back on lakes. It was stated that this was an old one and they didn't think of it at the time they wrote the PUD. Mark stated that it seems pretty harmless. Mr. Abernathy concluded that it doesn't seem reasonable to reconfigure the pool enclosure at this point. At this point, Frank Frye asked about surveyor mistakes and what needs to be done in order to stop the errors by the surveyors and what are the consequences. He asked whether they need an as built afterwards. Kay stated that that was how this one was caught, that it was the as built that was submitted to find it. Kay stated that one needs to 1't 4 August 1, 2002 16J see it from the standpoint as a professional and consider that the amount of mistakes are miniscule in comparison to how many are actually done correctly. Joe Schmitt stated if a registered land surveyor, from a professional review and if it's a contract issue, could file a complaint through the contract Licensing Board. Frank Frye stated that there needs to be some consequences to the mistakes made by the surveyors and maybe there is cause that the owner requires they pay for these proceedings. Kay added that there is always possibility of a civil action. Ray stated in addition to this that the county does notify the contractor licensing and the errors go on their record and there are consequences if it happens one too many times. Mr. Abemathy stated the surveyor misperceived what the set back was, and didn't commit a physical error because he thought it was a 10-foot set back instead of 12. Mr, Abemathy asked if there were any questions for the petitioners or if any member of the public wished to testify. Mr. Abemathy closed the public hearing and asked for a motion. He made a motion to forward this petition to the Board of Appeals with the recommendation of approval w/conditions stated in the staff report. Lindy Adelstein and Russell A. Budd second the motion. The commission had a motion of 8-0. Mr. Abernathy began discussion on 8B rezone request 2001AR-1595. He understands there is a desire to handle this together with RZ 2002 - AR 1596. Mr. Ogara had a motion to modify agenda and add the two items to the agenda together. Russell A. Budd and Lora Jean Young second the motion. The commission had a motion of 8-0. Kay Deselem went over the staff report for block 103 and 104, 1595 and 1596. She reviewed Ariel photographs to see the homes in this area, one on 44th terrace with 4.26- acre track and the applicant is proposing 17 lots on this area and the other on 30th Avenue with a 3.15-acre track applicant proposing 13 lots. She stated that since density rounds down, it becomes 4 units per acre. Staff RSF-3 now, rezone RSF-5, post built out in 2006. Staff has analyzed these particular petitions for compliance with the growth management plan. She stated that they have come to conclusion that the two petitions are inconsistent with the growth management plan. Kay provided evaluation for the relationship or each particular request for the future and existing land uses. It was determined this will be compatible if development with the proposed rezoning. She stated staff recommending approval for the particular petitions with having included conditions; conditions to which the applicant has agreed to according to the petition limitation of a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet, and secondly the limitation of the number of units as proposed by the applicant of 13 and 17. Lindy Adelstein asked a question regarding if we did not change zoning, how many units could be put on property. Kay responded that it would be limited to 3 units per acre. Kenneth asked if it would still include the 4-unit bonus for being near an activity center. They would get a bonus but based on limitation of the zoning. It was stated that the request to supply a site plan for these parcels was waived. The commission felt it would have been very helpful and essentials. They wanted to know why it was waived. 5 16J 1 Conventional rezoning does not necessarily have a site plan, last parcel brought forward by the applicant, site plan what was what gave the board the opportunity to understand that he wanted to do something consistent with the neighborhood, based on that consistency and some other criteria, whether approved that, concerned about the consistency. Jim Ogara, a petitioner, stated that at a meeting last November he proposed the development through a new proposal in order to fit in with the neighborhood, block 1868, and that there was some confusion between RSF-3 and RSF-5 standards. He determined what the density is in the surrounding area. Jim gave an example of the property to the south of the area. He went through the calculations for Blocks 103 and 104. Mr. Abemathy asked about the sewer and water applications in this area. Jim Ogara stated that the Civic Association notified that the school district has interest in the property especially because there is a significant problem with overcrowding in the elementary schools to the North of this area. He stated that Kindergarten and first grade would be one facility and another school for the upper grades. There will be a decision made at the August 22na meeting and there will be extensive analysis on this matter. Ray Bellows stated that the determining factor would be drainage and other environmental factors. Mark Strain questioned how do you know the compatibility when you don't have a site plan. Joe Schmitt stated that it is beyond character of interest. The issue is rezoning which takes place before design and it is up to county staff to approve. For the record, Marjorie Student stated the case law rezoning from one zone to another. She stated that the board couldn't impose any other standards. Jim stated that prior to zoning there is no design. Lindy Adelstein feels that they created their own dilemna. Jim stated building the project in with neighborhood by rounding up, even if 1/100 of an acre. He stated there has to be consistency with lot shaping in order to fit in that many. For the record, Marjorie Student stated that through the planning commission, the numbers are rounded down, not up. Ray Bellows stated that rounding comes into play with RSF zoning. 5 units/acre. Public speaker Janet Powell, an advocate for the school board, stated that the developer wants to increase the number of houses built. She stated that no decision would be made 6 until the school board makes their decision. She stated she would rather have the school than homes. Mark Strain said that the lots should be put consistent with the neighborhood. Public speaker Jeffrey Faramo spoke about a zoning change from RSF-3 to RSF-5. Jeffrey stated that he was voting against the zoning. He stated that educational safety is priority and should take precedent. He feels that this is not fair to the children. His main point about this was that right now 1000 children are being put in 18 portables. He asked if this was really fair to them. He also stated that a majority of the children walk to and from school. He mad points regarding the schools being overcrowded and that they are over built with no future plan. He stated that because of the odd shape of the area it is difficult to get a site plan. Jim Ogara stated that he does not have enough data and if he could put this matter off until the next meeting. He asked for a continuum. There was a motion to continue until the next meeting on September 5th. Lora Jean Young motioned, Mark Strain second. All in favor of a motion to continue AR 1595 was 8-0. A motion to continue AR 1596 on September 5th was second by Lindy Adelstein. This was also a motion o 8-0. Joe Schmitt mentioned that they need a conceptual plan to help visualize everything. Mr. Abernathy asked whether the modifications have gone to the BCC and whether it is needed to modify language on provision. Marjorie stated that in her opinion, that if there is conflict then yes, but if there is no conflict than no. Mr. Abemathy feels that they are equally important and the material needs to be in 2 weeks earlier. Marjorie stated that the information is submitted to staff 3 weeks prior. The other submittals to staff are 1 week prior. She stated there is a resolution that exists. Joe Schmitt stated two things needed were to have information in 2 weeks prior and supplemental information 5 days prior. Petitioners who want to expedite will get in 3 weeks prior to get it to staff in 2 weeks, especially for fast tracking and low-income housing. An example where more time may be needed is for the economic development in triangle in Immokalee. In this case, there is an exception for time. Joe Schmitt spoke about Arrowhead and Cypress Glen and how they began in January and it took until July, a 6 month process, to have anything resolved. He stated there is a tight timeline financially and from applicants. Some issues are applying for funding and the state mandated some other issues involved. Mr. Abemathy had a concern with the process extending from January to July to get the TIS problem resolved. Joe Schmitt responded with that time was needed to review. It would not be fair to the public if there weren't proper review of the issue. Marjorie wanted to state the timeline being imposed in situations when being reviewed to county commissioners. At this point, commissioner Frank Frye discussed his letter to the editor from the Naples Daily News. He stated that the presentation from Mr. Molher during the June 18th 1t 7 meeting was inconsistent with the Board's recommendations. He spoke about the conversation between Mark Strain and Mr. Molher in regards to the oil drilling as a conditional use. He felt this was not clear on what the commission's stance was. Mark Strain stated at this time that Barron Collier needed to oil drill as a conditional use and that it needs to go to a public hearing. He stated this is extremely important that the BCC know where they stand. Mark Strain spoke of Heritage Bay. It was stated that staff was very clear about the TDR process felt by the commission and their recommendation. Frank Frye stated that the public needs to know the commission's position because it may differ from the staff's. Frank wants this position on this matter clearly stated. Mr. Abernathy stated that hiring of consultants to act as staff members may cause things to go wrong. He hopes that staffing positions will be filled to help out in further issues. Joe Schmitt stated that with large projects it is hard for the public to determine what people are thinking. He spoke of a request for proposal for contact services. He stated that there are efforts to build up the staff. He knows they are in demand and they may have to hire contractors, but knows that it is still the staff's responsibility for any issues or inaccuracies. At this point Chairman Kenneth Abernathy called to continue this meeting at the next one on September 5th. Meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Kenneth Abernathy, Chairman AGENDA Page 1 of 2 I=lala c,,rter RECEIVED ¢ Henning MartinsonKathleen Coyle k--/ - From: wright_m Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 9:11 AM ~oar'd of ;:ount~v Comm~ ss ~oners 16,1 1 To: merritti; MartinsonKathleen; Maureen K. Kenyon; Minutes and Subject: August 2002 Agenda AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTORS' LICENSING BOARD DATE: August 21, 2002 TIME: 9:00 A.M. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING COURTHOUSE COMPLEX ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THAT TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. I. ROLL CALL II. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS: III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: DATE: June 19, 2002 and July 17, 2002 DISCUSSION: NEW BUSINESS: Milan Kamienicky - Request to waive exam for Painting license. James W. Whipple - Request to waive exam for Irrigation license. Curtis Daniel Brown - Request to reinstate Carpentry license without retaking exams. Julio Urtiaga - Request reciprocity from Dade County on Roofing license. OLD BUSINESS: Gervacio J. Andrade - Re-appear before Board on temporary Floor Covering License. Sherman Ellis - Request to have Landscaping Unlimited license transferred from son's name to his without taking the exams. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Case # 2002-05- Mr. & Mrs. Smolucha vs. David James Carter D/B/A Dave ~ Roofin.q. vii. IX. REPORTS: Item# Copies 8/20/2002 AGENDA X. NEXT MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 Page 2 of 2 163 1~ 8/20/2002 COLLIER COUNTY Board of RECEIVED County {7ommiss i ~ oner ~ August 15, 2002 Ms. Susan M. Harp Certified Local Government (CLG) Coordinator Bureau of Historic Preservation R.A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 RE: Collier County Preservation Board Meeting Dear bls. Harp: This letter is to inform you that the Collier County Historic and Archaeological Preservation Board will hold a public hearing at 9:30 mm. ~m \\ ~'(tncsda~, .'\t,~u~t 21, 2002. I have enclosed a copy of the agenda for your review and records. The meeting that '~411 be held in Conference Room "B" at the CommuniD' Development Services Building in Naples, Florida. In addition, I have also attached the minutes from the July 17th meeting for your files. If you have any questions concerning these meetings, please do not hesitate to call me. My phone number is 941-403-2463 or you can e-mail me at: Raybellows(a~)colliergov.net. Sincerely~ ~,~, elloxvs, Chief Planner (} Iistoric Preservation Coordinator) CC: Preservation Board Members (7) Sue Filson Joe Schmitt Ron J amro Susan Murray Kay Deselem Misc. Corres: Copies To: ii AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION BOARD WILL MEET AT 9:30 AM, ~/EDNESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2002 AT THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION, CONFERENCE ROOM "B", LOCATED AT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES FLORIDA: NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE HAPB WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. 1. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA: 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 17, 2002 3. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT: 4. OLD BUSINESS: HD-01-1, Roberts Ranch Little Palm Island Status Historic Preservation Guide 5. NEW BUSINESS: A. Preservation Board Membership Time limits 6. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 7. ADJOURN . J :[ Colher County Government Department of Public Information 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (941) 774-8999 September 4, 2002 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEAS.E Lavah Hetzel Public Information 774-8373~ / BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE LOCAL .REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, September 11, 6 p.m. CommunRy Development & Environmental Services 2800 North I-Iorseshoe Dr. Conference Room C A~nda 1. Roll Call 2. Adoption. of Agenda 3. Adoption of Minutes August 7, 2002 meeting 4. Announcements 5. Old Business a. Items Addressed in Letter of August 15, 2002 (Development Updates, Mini-Triangle KPP, Davis Blvd. Lighting, Phase II Bayshore Drive Zoning Overlay, Art Festival, Organizational. Stxucture, Bel- Air Motel, Errors and Omissions Policy, Waterfront Subdistriet Extension, Bonding) b. Update on Development Activity within the CRA District e. CRA. funds for beatj.fieafion initiaQves 6. New Business a. September 30, 2002, CRA Board Agenda Topics Misc. Corres: b. Diseua$ion on whether to use CR~ fund, for select Planning Effort, (e.g. Drive Zoning Overlay, US 41 and Davis Blvd Overlays) ) Date: 7.Citiz~n Comments 8. Adjournment ~ Copies 10: Note: All meetings are publicly noticed in the W. Harmon Tum~ Buildin~ (Administration Building F) and on the CRA website. Please call Thomas Tomeflin, Priaeipal Planner, at (239) 659.5752 i~0~:l~ve any questions abou~ the meeti~ In accordance with zl~e ,4merica~ with D~raMlitle; ~ct, persons needing assistance to participate in any of these ~roceed¢ng$ xho~tld contact Thomax Tomerlin at lea~t ¥8 hour~.prior to the meeting. WORKFORCE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 19, 2002 Minutes 1. Members present: Karen Homiak, Mark Strain, Barb Cacchione, Mario Valle, and Susan Golden, David Ellis Members absent: Larry Keesey, Joe Paterno and Mark Lindner Staff present: Cormac Giblin and Patrick White Guests: Debrah Forester, Phil Peters, Bill Klohn, Fred Thomas and Dillman Thomas 2. Minutes of July 15 and August 5th were presented and approved. The committee reviewed a draft of the Inclusionary Zoning ordinance prepared by staff. There was also a discussion of the timing of the Inclusionary Zoning ordinance and whether or not it would be ready for the fall 2002 Land Development Code cycle. Assistant County Attorney Patrick White did not think that a Growth Management Plan amendment would be necessary but he would review questions raised and report back to the committee. Suggestions provided to staff included: When the ordinance is formatted with Whereas(s) reference information from the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan. #5. remove the phrase market rate housing ....... due to #6. remove residential developments providing ..... Section III adjust definitions in # 1 & 3 to be consistent and include workforce definition. Section V change the heading/title V. 1. expand to include other funding programs available through FAHB Section VII Exemptions add Collier County Housing Authority and Habitat for Humanity. There was discussion on when inclusionary zoning would be triggered whether it is at the zoning phase, subdivision platting, SDP or other triggers. There was a suggestion that the inclusionary zoning process be linked to Road Impact Fee Districts. Patrick White indicated that he would review the language regarding "aggregating land" in the DRI regulations. Bill Kohln suggested an option for developers should be to place money in a pool to provide mortgage assistance to low income families. Debrah Forester suggested including Bill Kohln's suggestion for a trust fund. Karen Homiak suggested C.0~'rc~,hanging the words affordable housing to moderately priced housing. Mark Strain . ~ i ~s_[ated that he would meet with Commissioner Fiala before the next meeting to discuss H~ing -- ~le ~ some of these items. It was also suggested that the committee hold a workshop with the community to focus on policy choices that are available to address the lack of workforce housing. Mario Valle provided a brief overview of the tourist tax, indexing of the gas tax and transfer fee issues from the Regional Planning Council meeting. Two of the three items were being forwarded to the Florida League of Counties to bring up in legislative session. There were some concerns about the proposed transfer tax so research was initiated. The committee requested that a revised draft of the Inclusionary zoning and a draft of the Linkage Fee ordinance be brought forward at the September meeting. 6. Next meeting is scheduled for September 9th. Meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m. l! ATTENDING: Fiala Carter Herming, Coyle Coletta ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE / RESCUE ADVISORY BOARD SUMMARY MARCH 7, 2002 t~ECEIVED DAVID EILER JIM LEWIS JERRI NEUHOUSE CHIEF RODRIGUEZ TARA LeGRAND - LATE ARRIVAL i~oard of' Count~ ,].ommissioners VICTOR HILL, MARCO EAGLE DALE FAY, FIREFIGHTER KEVIN WOLFF. ISLES OF CAPRI CIVIC ASSOC. ABSENT: CHIEF'S REPORT A. OPERATIONS REPORT FEBRUARY 2002 BRUSHFIRES: VEHICLE FIRES: STRUCTURE FIRES: FIRE ALARMS: VEHICLE ACCIDENTS: MOVE UPS HAZ MAT: PUBLIC ASSISTS: SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER FIRE RELATED: MEDICAL CALLS: MED FLIGHT LANDINGS: OTHER MEDICAL RELATED: MARINE BOAT CALLS: BOAT FIRES: RESCUES: MARINE HAZ MAT 2 0 3 3 1 7 0 1 0 1 17 0 2 1 1 0 1 TOTAL: 37 Misc. C0rres: Copies To: JERRI NEUHOUSE: IS OUR RESPONSE TIME STILL GOOD7 CHIEF RODRIGUEZ:: YES, WE ARE STILL DOING GOOD ON OUR RESPONSE TIMES. DE? HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTERIZE THE MONTH - SLOW? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO REALLY, IT SEEMS LIKE WE ARE RUNNING ANYWHERE FROM 20 - 30 CALLS PER MONTH. WE'RE STEADY, IT HASN'T GONE DOWN AND IT HASN'T GONE TOO FAR UP. WE ARE STAYING AVERAGE. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: SO THE 422 FROM LAST YEAR - IT LOOKS LIKE WE ARE GOING TO BE A LITTLE UNDER IF WE KEEP THIS TREND OF 20 OR 30 A MONTH. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO, WE WILL GO UP. AS WE GET INTO THE FIRE SEASON NOW, ITS GOING TO SHOOT UP. THE BRUSHFIRE SEASON IS GOING TO SHOOT UP THE NUMBER OF CALLS TREMENDOUSLY. AND I WILL HAVE THE YEAR TO DATE INFORMATION FOR YOU NEXT MONTH. 11 Co Do JERRI NEUHOUSE: JERRI NEUHOUSE: MALE VOICE: MALE VOICE: JERRI NEUHOUSE: VOLUNTEER REPORT 5 ACTIVE VOLUNTEERS. NO ADDITIONAL VOLUNTEERS THE PAST MONTH TRAINING REPORT TRAINING IS SCHEDULED FOR EVERY THURSDAY BUDGET REPORT THIS MONTH WILL START THE BUDGET PROCESS FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR. WE WILL HAVE TO SCHEDULE SOME BUDGET MEETINGS SOON. FOR THE RECORD, TARA LeGRAND IS NOW PRESENT ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CHIEF'S REPORT? MOVE TO ACCEPT THE CHIEF'S REPORT SECOND MOTION CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS 16J JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHY DON'T WE DEAL WITH THE MILEAGE RATE. YOU SAID YOU ARE WAITING ON A LETTER FROM US? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, THE BOARD NEEDS TO PUT TOGETHER A LETTER RE: THE PUBLIC MEETING THAT WAS HELD AT THE CIVIC CENTER. EXPLAINING HOW THE MEETING WENT AND WHAT WE THOUGHT OF THE MEETING. WE NEED TO HAVE THEM PROCEED ON TO THE NEXT STEP. I KNOW THAT THE ORDINANCE HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND NOW WE ARE WAITING TO SEE IF IT HAS TO GO FOR A PUBLIC MEETING, EITHER ONE OR TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND WHEN WILL IT BE SCHEDULED. ONE THING THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS VERY QUICKLY BECAUSE WE ARE STARTING BUDGET PREPARATION. WHAT SLOWED DOWN THE COUNTY IS THAT WE LOST OUR ADMINISTRATOR, TOM STORRAR. HE IS NO LONGER THERE. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHEN DID HE QUIT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: HE WENT BACK TO THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE. RIGHT NOW THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR IS FILLING IN - KEN PINEAU. HE IS AWARE THAT WE NEED TO FIND OUT WHAT THE NEXT STEP IS BY PROCEEDING TO ASK JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHO ARE WE ASKING. WE ARE SENDING A LETTER TO THE COMMISSIONERS ADVISING THEM THAT WE FELT THE MEETING WENT WELL AND THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO PROCEED WITH PROPOSED MILLAGE RATE INCREASE. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES MALE VOICE: IT WAS APPARENT THAT THE VAST MAJORITY OF THOSE PRESENT SUPPORT THE INCREASE. JERRI NEUHOUSE: YOU KNOW, I HESITATE TO DO THAT BECAUSE WE NEVER DID ASK FOR A HAND COUNT. THEY ALL SUPPORTED US, BUT I LEFT THERE UNCLEAR ABOUT WHETHER THEY SUPPORTED THE INCREASE OR WHETHER THEY WERE JUST VOICING THEIR SUPPORT OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. HOW DID YOU FEEL AS A BOARD MEMBER, KEVIN? KEVIN WOLF: THE TOUGH PART IS REPRESENTING THE MOOD OF THE GROUP UNCLEAR MALE VOICE: HAVE WE HAD ANY NEGATIVE RESPONSE? JERRI NEUHOUSE: I HAVE NO FURTHER INQUIRIES AT ALL. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I HAVEN'T HAD ANY SINCE THE MEETING 16J JERRI NEUHOUSE: SO A SIMPLE LETTER SAYING THAT THE MEETING WENT WELL, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT RECEIVED A LOT OF SUPPORT, THE CITIZENS WERE ENCOURAGED AND INVITED TO CONTACT US WITH FURTHER QUESTIONS OR FOR INFORMATION. TO DATE, THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER INQUIRIES AND WE FEEL THAT IT IS TIME FOR US TO PROCEED. PLEASE ADVISE US AS TO WHAT THE NEXT STEP IS? IS THAT ALRIGHT WITH YOU ALL? ALL AGREE JERRI NEUHOUSE: LET'S DO THAT LETTER, ROD, AS SOON AS WE ARE DONE WITH THE MEETING. JERRI NEUHOUSE: MY QUESTION IS, WE ARE SENDING THIS TO THE COMMISSIONERS, WHERE IS IT GOING FROM THERE? TO LEO OCHS? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHAT IS LEO OCHS' OFFICIAL TITLE AND ROLE? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: HE IS THE ASSISTANT COUNTY MANAGER. JERRI NEUHOUSE: GIVEN OUR HISTORY WITH MR. OCHS, ARE WE GOING TO FIND HIM HELPFUL? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I BELIEVE SO BECAUSE THE COUNTY MANAGER, TOM OLLIFF, IS AWARE OF OUR SITUATION AND HE IS IN SUPPORT OF THE MILLAGE RATE INCREASE. ALSO THE BUDGET DIRECTOR IS IN SUPPORT. MALE VOICE: CAN WE WRITE THE LETTER ADDRESSED TO .... CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: CC TO LEO OCHS AND TOM OLLIFF. ITS GOING TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BUT WE COPY .... MALE VOICE: DO WE NEED OR HAVE TO DO THAT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I BELIEVE WE SHOULD. SO THAT NOT ONLY LEO OCHS RECEIVES A COPY BUT ALSO THE COUNTY MANAGER RECEIVES A COPY. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHERE DOES KEN FIT INTO THIS? MALE VOICE I WOULD RATHER IT GO TO KEN JERRI NEUHOUSE: KEN PROBABLY CARRIES MORE WEIGHT THAN WE DO. IF WE SEND THIS TO THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AND WE COPY KEN ON IT AND THE COUNTY MANAGER. LET TOM OLLIFF COPY LEO. LET KEN & TOM COPY LEO. 16J 1 MALE VOICE: RIGHT. I WOULD THINK THAT IT SHOULD GO TO JUST THE NECESSARY PEOPLE AT THE TOP AND LET THEM .... CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: AND LET THEM DELEGATE IT DOWN. JERRI NEUHOUSE: I WOULD RATHER MINIMIZE THIS FIRE DEPARTMENT'S INVOLVEMENT WITH LEO OCHS. IF AN WHEN POSSIBLE, I THINK WE SHOULD GO TO THE TOP WHENEVER WE CAN. TOM OLLIFF HAS BEEN VERY SUPPORTIVE. AND TOM STORRAR WAS. KEN PINEAU IS A STAND UP PERSON. NOTHING AGAINST LEO, BUT I THINK WE MIGHT AS WELL GO TO THE PEOPLE WE THINK CAN HELP US. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: SO WE WRITE THE LETTER TO THE BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, CC KEN PINEAU & TOM OLLIFF? AND LET THEM PASS IT DOWN THE LINE TO THE PROPER COUNTY STAFF? JERRI NEUHOUSE: YES. LEO WILL GET A COPY. I WOULD RATHER HE ACT ON THEIR INSTRUCTION RATHER THAN US. IT WOULD BE LIKE SOMEBODY GOING TO ANDY WITH A REQUEST FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT INSTEAD OF GOING TO YOU. IF YOU WANT TO ASSIGN IT TO ANDY, THEN YOU ASSIGN IT TO ANDY. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WE ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH THE LETTER? JERRI NEUHOUSE: YES, WE ARE GOING TO ASK THEM TO PLEASE ADVISE US A QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AS TO WHAT OUR NEXT STEP IS AND AS TO WHAT IMPACT THIS IS GOING TO HAVE ON OUR BUDGET PREPARATIONS. WE ARE STILL GOING TO BE BASING OUR BUDGET ON THE OLD MILLAGE AND THE OLD AD VALOREM WHICH MEANS, ONCE AGAIN, WE WILL SQUEEZE BY AND HAVE TO WAIT AND REVISE AND AMEND OUR BUDGET LATTER ON. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WHEN WE DO THE BUDGET, REGARDLESS, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO DO THE EXPANDED LEVEL OF SERVICE. WE ARE GOING TO DO THE NORMAL BUDGET WITH THE AMOUNT OF MONEY SPENT THIS YEAR AND THEN ON THE EXPANDED LEVEL OF SERVICE, WE ARE GOING TO PUT IN THE THREE FIRE FIGHTERS AND HOW MUCH THAT WILL COST. THEN, IF THE MILLAGE GOES THROUGH, IT IS ALREADY THERE IN PLACE. JERRI NEUHOUSE: SO WE DON'T HAVE TO TRY AND MAKE IT BALANCE? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO, WE ARE NOT GOING TO DO THAT. WE ARE GOING TO DO THE REGULAR BUDGET WITH THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT WE PROJECT. THEN THE EXPANDED LEVEL OF SERVICE IS IN CASE THE MILLAGE GOES THROUGH. IT SHOWS WHAT WE NEED AND WHAT IT IS GOING TO COST. MALE VOICE: SO IN PREPARING THE BUDGET, IT DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE INCREASE. 16J CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: EXACTLY, ONLY THE EXPANDED LEVEL OF SERVICE - THAT'S WHERE THAT WILL KICK IN. JERRI NEUHOUSE: ARE WE GOOD TO GO THEN ON THE MILLAGE RATE? DO THE LETTER AND SEE WHAT OUR NEXT STEP IS? ALL ARE IN AGREEMENT.'? ALL AGREE JERRI NEUHOUSE: THE TWO IN AND TWO OUT: I SEE THAT YOU HAVE THE CERTIFICATION THAT HAS TO BE COMPLETED. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WHAT YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU WAS SENT TO ME BY THE STATE IN FEBRUARY AND THE DIVISION OF STATE FIRE MARSHALL IS GOING TO ADOPT THE TWO IN TWO OUT RULE, 1710 RULE, NO LATER THAN APRIL 1 ST OF THIS YEAR. NOW, WITH THAT THEY HAVE ATTACHED A CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXTENSION FOR 6 MONTHS. WE ARE ASKING THE STATE FOR A SIX MONTH EXTENSION ON MEETING THE STAFFING REQUIREMENT. WE CANNOT SIGN THIS. THE COUNTY AND I HAVE PREPARED AN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WHICH IS GOING TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THEY WILL APPROVE AND SIGN THE EXTENSION. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE MARCH 12TM BOARD MEETING, BUT LEO OCHS PULLED IT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHY DID LEO OCHS PULL IT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I BELIEVE HE WANTED TO LOOK INTO IT MORE. I WILL LEAVE THAT AT THAT. IT SCHEDULED TO GO BEFORE THE BOARD MARCH 26TM. JERRI NEUHOUSE: BUT THIS SAYS THAT IT MUST BE RECEIVED BY APRIL 1. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT, IF IT GOES TO THE BOARD AND IT IS SIGNED MARCH 26TM, THEN IT WILL HAVE TO BE FEDERAL EXPRESSED TO THAT IT ARRIVES OR IS AT LEAST POST MARKED PRIOR TO APRIL ! ST MALE VOICE: REFRESH MY MEMORY. EVEN WHEN WE HIRED THE NEW FIREMEN, WE ARE STILL NOT ABLE TO MEET IT? JERRI NEUHOUSE: YES WE WILL MEET IT BECAUSE OF OUR MUTUAL AID. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: AND I COUNT AS A THIRD FIREFIGHTER AND A VOLUNTEER CAN COUNT AS THE FOURTH IF AVAILABLE. IF NOT, WE STILL HAVE AUTOMATIC MUTUAL AID WITH A TRUCK AND AT LEAST 2 PEOPLE RESPONDING. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WE WILL HAVE OUR TWO AND THEY WILL HAVE THEIR TWO. WE WILL BE IN COMPLIANCE. WHAT WE WON'T BE IS A STAND ALONE TWO IN AND TWO OUT. 16J CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: MY QUESTION IS THIS: HAVE YOU ASKED ANYBODY, LIKE MR. OLLIFF, WHY THIS WAS PULLED? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I CAN'T JUMP THE CHAIN OF COMMAND. I SPOKE WITH LEO OCHS THIS AFTERNOON. AND I SENT HIM ALL OF THE PAPERWORK ON THE TWO IN TWO OUT RULE AND NFPA 1710 & 1720. I GAVE HIM ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE. I DON'T KNOW WHY HE WAITED TO THE LAST MINUTE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE INFORMATION. THIS HAS BEEN COMING FOR A WHILE. HE DID PULL IT FROM THE AGENDA FOR MARCH 12TM. HOPEFULLY IT WILL BE ON THE AGENDA ON MARCH 26TM. IF IT DOESN'T GO ON THE 26TM AGENDA, WE. AS A BOARD AND AS MYSELF AS A FIRE CHIEF, SHOULD SEND A LETTER TO THE STATE. SOMEBODY NEEDS TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE BECAUSE THE STATE IS GOING TO START FINING DEPARTMENTS. JERRI NEUHOUSE: I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT WE, AS A BOARD, WHEN WE WRITE THE LETTER TO THE COMMISSIONERS, INCLUDE: THAT WE UNDERSTAND THAT THIS WAS PULLED FROM THE MARCH 12TM MEETING AND WE TRUST THAT THIS WILL BE ON THE AGENDA FOR THE 26TM IN ORDER FOR US TO MEET OUR DEADLINE. PLEASE ADVISE IF THIS IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE WE NEED TO NOTIFY THE STATE. LET'S NOT WAIT. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I BELIEVE SO BECAUSE THIS SCARES ME. MALE VOICE: TO WHOM WAS THIS MEMO SENT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: STATE. IT WAS SENT TO ME AS THE FIRE CHIEF FROM THE MALE VOICE: NO BODY ELSE WITHIN THE COUNTY? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO, IT WAS SENT TO ALL FIRE CHIEFS. MALE VOICE: IT CALLS FOR CERTIFICATION FROM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. HOW IS THAT DEFINED? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I THOUGHT THAT I COULD SIGN BECAUSE I AM CONSIDERED THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT, BUT BEING THAT WE ARE GOVERNED UNDER THE BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, I WAS ADVISED THAT I COULD NOT SIGN IT THAT THE CHAIRMAN HAD TO SIGN IT. MALE VOICE: DOES IT THEN HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE WHOLE BOARD? OR CAN IT BE PRESENTED TO ... 16J 11 CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: IT IS GOING AS CONSENT AGENDA. WE HAD TO PREPARE AN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXPLAINING WHY THIS NEEDS TO BE SIGNED. WE PREPARED ONE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR BOTH OUR DEPARTMENT AND OCHOPEE FIRE BECAUSE WE BOTH FALL UNDER THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSION. WE ATTACHED THE FORM FOR THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WE CAN LOOK AT? DO YOU HAVE COPIES OF THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THAT CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES. MALE VOICE: DOES THE ENTIRE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HAVE TO CONSIDER THIS? IT IS A STATE MANDATE. WE HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO COMPLY, CLOSE DOWN OR GET THIS THING SIGNED. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: IT IS GOING ON THE CONSENT AGENDA WHICH IS APPROVED AS ONE ITEM. ONCE THE CONSENT AGENDA IS APPROVED, THE CHAIRMAN WILL SIGN IT. MALE VOICE: SO WE MIGHT GET BY THE 27TM OR 28TM ? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WE WILL KNOW ON THE 26TM AND THEN THE COUNTY WILL SENT IT TO THE STATE. MALE VOICE: WHEN THEY GET AROUND TO IT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO, THEY KNOW THE DEADLINE. I SPOKE TO KEN PINEAU TODAY AND HE INFORMED ME THAT IT WILL BE FEDERAL EXPRESSED TO THE STATE THE DAY AFTER THE BOARD MEETING. THIS WILL MAKE SURE THAT IT IS THERE PRIOR TO APRIL 1 ST. JERRI NEUHOUSE: LET'S CONFIRM THAT IN OUR LETTER TONIGHT. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: IT IS A GOOD IDEA TO PUT SOMETHING IN WRITING BECAUSE I THINK THIS IS IMPORTANT AND THE STATE FIRE MARSHALL'S OFFICE IS, SUPPOSEDLY AFTER APRIL 1sT, ARE GOING AROUND THE STATE AND LOOK AT DEPARTMENTS TO SEE IF THE DEPARTMENTS ARE COMPLYING. IF THEY ARE NOT THERE IS GOING TO BE A FINE. MALE VOICE: UNCLEAR CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, IT WAS ONE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND HE PULLED THE ONE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR BOTH DEPARTMENTS FOR THE 12TM. MALE VOICE: DO WE HAVE AN EXPLANATION OF WHY HE PULLED IT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO, HE WANTED TO LOOK INTO FURTHER. JERRI NEUHOUSE: SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD QUESTIONS FOR TUESDAY'S MEETING. HE IS GOING TO BE ADDRESSING THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION'S MEETING. IT WAS ON HARRY'S NEWS LETTER. IT SAID THAT NANCY HAD MADE ARRANGEMENTS TO HAVE LEO OCHS COME TO ADDRESS, NOT ONLY THE FIRE TAX ISSUE, BUT A COUPLE OF OTHER ISSUES AT TUESDAY'S MEETING. IF ANY OF US ARE GOING TO BE IN ATTENDANCE... ACTUALLY, SINCE WE ARE NOT THERE VOTING ON ANYTHING OR DISCUSSING ANYTHING THAT WE WOULD VOTE ON, I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TO ADVERTISE RIGHT? DID WE ESTABLISH AT THE LAST MEETING THAT THERE IS NOT A VIOLATION OF THE SUNSHINE LAW. WE JUST DON'T SIT TOGETHER AT THE MEETING. WE ADVERTISED LAST TIME WE WERE THERE. I WASN'T PLANNING ON BEING THERE TUESDAY BUT I SURELY WILL BE THERE NOW. MALE VOICE: WHO, AND MAYBE KEVIN CAN ANSWER, HOW DID HE END UP BEING INVOLVED IN THIS MEETING ANYWAY? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THAT I HAVE HEARD OF IT. KEVIN WOLFF? I WAS THERE WHEN THEY DISCUSSED IT. REALLY, THERE WAS NO SPEAKER FOR THE NEXT MEETING UNCLEAR. SHE HAD RECOMMENDED APPROACHING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, TOM OLLIFF. APPARENTLY, THE COUNTY BOARD MEETING IS THE SAME DAY AS THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION MEETING AND THERE WAS SOME CONCERN WHETHER HE COULD GET AWAY IN TIME TO BE THE SPEAKER. SO HE DESIGNATED LEO OCHS. JERRI NEUHOUSE: AND IT'S NOT JUST THE FIRE DEPARTMENT HE IS COMING TO TALK ABOUT. HE IS COMING TO TALK ABOUT COUNTY ISSUES - THE SIDEWALKS, THE ISSUES THAT HARRY AND EVERYONE HAS BEEN THROWING UP TO THE COUNTY. HE IS COMING TO ADDRESS ALL OF THOSE. IF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ISSUE DOESN'T COME UP AT THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION MEETING, I'M NOT GOING TO BRING IT UP. I SIMPLY ASK LEO OUTSIDE WHY DID HE PULL IT? IF IT DOES COME UP, I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW. BUT WE WILL COVER IT IN THE LETTER. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I JUST GOT WORD THAT THE TRUCK WE WERE PLANNING TO PURCHASE FROM MARCO, IT IS GOING ON THE BCC AGENDA FOR THE 12TM. I GOT EVERYTHING SQUARED AWAY. THE MECHANIC FROM FLEET TOOK A LOOK AT IT YESTERDAY. ALL THE PAPERWORK IS DONE. SO WE WILL BE PURCHASING THE FIRE TRUCK FROM MARCO ISLAND. JERRI NEUHOUSE: AND THAT IS FROM IMPACT FEES? 1t CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: COMPLETELY FROM IMPACT FEES. WE WILL NOT OWE A DIME ON THE TRUCK. WE ARE PURCHASING IT FOR $31,000. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHERE IS IT GOING TO BE HOUSED? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: HERE, I AM GOING TO MOVE THE BRUSH TRUCK OUT. IT'S A WOODS TRUCK. WE SHOULD HAVE THE TRUCK IN OUR POSSESSION BY THE END OF THE MONTH. LEO OCHS PULLED IT OFF THE AGENDA, BUT I WAS ABLE TO GET IT BACK ON THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE 12TM AND THERE SHOULD BE NO PROBLEMS. NEW BUSINESS JERRI NEUHOUSE: I HAVE ONE ITEM FOR NEW BUSINESS. I HAVE NOW GOT THE BASIC FLOOR PLANS AND THE ARTISTS RENDERING FOR WHAT IS GOING ON OVER AT THE NEW COMPLEX, AVERASONA, ON MAINSAIL. I HAVE A COUPLE OF COPIES AT THE OFFICE IF YOU WANT TO COME BY AND LOOK AT IT. IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT WE WILL BE VOTING ON, I AM ASSUMING THAT WOULD BE OK FOR YOU TO COME BY AND LOOK AT IT. MY FIRST OBSERVATION WAS "I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY THINK THEY ARE GOING TO GET A FIRE TRUCK AROUND THIS FOUNTAIN?" IT LOOKS AWFULLY TIGHT BUT, AS ROD WAS SAYING, BEFORE THEY CAN GET IT PERMITTED THEY WILL HAVE TO MEET WITH ROD. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: IT'S THE SAME THING THAT HAPPENED WITH THE TWIN DOLPHINS. THEY DIDN'T HAVE AN ADEQUATE TURN-AROUND FOR THE FIRE TRUCKS. I MAKE THEM SHRINK THE ISLAND AT THE END OF ONE BUILDING SO THAT WE COULD HAVE A BIGGER TURN AROUND FOR THE TRUCKS BEFORE I WOULD SIGN OFF ON ANYTHING. JERRI NEUHOUSE: IT COULD BE VERY BIG. IT COULD BE JUST THE ARTIST'S RENDERING. THEY ARE PLANNING ON 5 BUILDINGS. ARVASONA IS THE FIRST AROUND THIS ITALIAN VILLA STYLE FOUNTAIN. THE COACH HOMES LOOK FIND. LOOKS LIKE A NORMAL ROAD GOING TO THE COACH HOMES. MALE VOICE: UNCLEAR QUESTION JERRI NEUHOUSE: THEY HAVE THEIR SALES CENTER ABOUT 70% COMPLETE. THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT BREAKING GROUND, I BELIEVE, APRIL OR MAY. IT WILL BE ABOUT A YEAR FOR THE FIRST BUILDING AND THEN THEY ARE GOING TO REDUCE THE PUBLIC GOLF COURSE DOWN TO A FOUR HOLE COURSE WHILE THEY ARE BUILDING. THEY FIGURE IT WILL TAKE ABOUT TWO YEARS TO TURN IT INTO A PGA GOLF COURSE. $80,000 MEMBERSHIP BUT IT WILL 16J STAY A PUBLIC COURSE HOWEVER, UNTIL THEY SELL SOMETHING LIKE 300 MEMBERSHIPS. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: AND IT ALL FALLS IN OUR DISTRICT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: I ASKED ROD IF WE WERE GOING TO GET SHORT- CHANGED LIKE WE DID ON THE TWIN DOLPHINS ON IMPACT FEES? WE EXPECTED MUCH MORE IN IMPACT FEES. ROD SAYS THAT THEY ARE ALREADY PURSUING A RE-EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT FEES. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I MET WITH PHIL TINDALL, WHO IS IN CHARGE TAPE RUNS OUT NEW TAPE: CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: ...... CONFIRMS THAT NEW IMPACT FEE STUDY. WHAT THE COUNTY IS DOING NOW IS TO PUT A COMMITTEE TOGETHER, MYSELF AND PAUL WILSON FROM OCHOPEE ARE ON THE COMMITTEE, AND THE COMMITTEE IS REVIEWING THE FOUR COMPANIES AND WE WILL GIVE OUR RECOMMENDATION AS TO WHAT FIRM SHOULD GET THE BID. THEY WILL BE LOOKING AT ALL COUNTY IMPACT FEES, NOT JUST THE FIRE IMPACT FEES. JERRI NEUHOUSE: DIDN'T THAT TAKE ABOUT 2 YEARS THE LAST TIME ? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I DON'T BELIEVE SO. I THINK ON OUR PART IT DID. BUT, THAT WAS JUST THE FIRE IMPACT FEES AND BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE IMPACT FEES BEFORE THAT. WE ALREADY HAVE IMPACT FEES IN PLACE, THE ONLY THING WE ARE LOOKING AT IS RAISING THE AMOUNT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: IT SOUNDS LIKE IT IS GOING TO BE A PRETTY CONVOLUTED, LONG COUNTY PROCESS. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES. IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN OVERNIGHT BUT, IT IS IN PLACE AND WE KNOW THAT THE IMPACT FEES ARE GOING UP. WE JUST DON'T KNOW WHEN. JERRI NEUHOUSE: SO THERE IS A REAL GOOD CHANCE THAT THIS FIRST BUILDING GOING UP WE ARE NOT GOING TO GET THE INCREASE. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: DOLPHINS. RIGHT, WE WILL GET MORE THAN WE GOT FROM TWIN CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: BECAUSE THAT WAS ONLY 36 UNITS AND THIS ONE IS 6 UNITS PER FLOOR AND 19 FLOORS IS 114 PLUS 3 PENTHOUSES. SO FIGURE ABOUT 120 UNITS PLUS THE IMPACT FOR THE LOBBY. WE SHOULD SEE AT LEAST 3 16J TIMES THE AMOUNT WE GOT FOR TWIN DOLPHINS. AND, HOPEFULLY, BEFORE THEY BREAK GROUND ON THE NEXT BUILDING, WE WILL HAVE THE NEW RATES. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: ALL OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS WITHIN THE COUNTY ARE INVOLVED. THEY ARE TRYING TO HAVE ONE UNIFIED IMPACT FEE SO THAT EACH DEPARTMENT IS UNIFORM. RIGHT NOW, OCHOPEE AND OURSELVES CHARGE A LOT LESS. IF YOU BUILD A HOUSE IN EAST NAPLES OR NORTH NAPLES, IT WILL COST YOU MORE IN IMPACT FEES. JERRI NEUHOUSE: ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS ROD SAID WAS THAT HE WANTED TO TALK TO THEM ABOUT POSSIBLE DOING A SUBSTATION OVER THERE. PERHAPS A DONATED PIECE OF LAND OVER ON MAINSAIL COMING STRICTLY FROM IMPACT FEES. AS THEY ARE BUILDING THE 5T}~ TOWER AND THE COACH HOMES, ASSUMING THE IMPACT FEES ARE RAISED, THERE WILL BE FUNDING FOR THAT. IT WOULD BE A CO-OPERATIVE EFFORT BETWEEN EMS AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. I WOULD ONLY MAKE ONE COMMENT - YOU HAD MENTIONED THAT YOU WERE THINKING ABOUT USING LAND RIGHT NEAR 951. IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. THEY ARE SO CONSCIENTIOUS AND SO METICULOUS ABOUT THE LOOK,. ANY OF THE STUFF GOING IN NOW IS GOING TO BE THIS "VILLA" STYLE THING. IT GOING TO BE LIKE GOING TO FIDDLER'S CREEK. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I KNOW THAT UP IN NORTH NAPLES WHEN THEY DONATED LAND, THEY BONDED TO ENSURE THAT THE STATION MATCHED THE HOMES. SO THAT IT BLENDED IN. JERRI NEUHOUSE: AND THAT'S REALLY TOUGH DOWN HERE BECAUSE ALL WE HAVE IS MANGROVES. IT'S GOING TO BE TOUGH SELL AND I WANT YOU TO KNOW GOING IN. YOU MIGHT WANT TO CHECK WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE PAPERWORK AND SEE IF THAT LITTLE PIECE THAT SAYS "FUTURE DEVELOPMENT". ALTHOUGH IT IS ANOTHER MINUTE DOWN MAINSAIL, IT STILL GIVES YOU PRESENCE ON MAINSAIL AND 951 MUCH QUICKER THAN COMING FROM HERE. MAIL VOICE: IS THAT PIECE OF LAND ....... UNCLEAR JERRI NEUHOUSE: I BELIEVE IT IS DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM IT. MAIL VOICE: UNCLEAR JERRI NEUHOUSE: MAYBE THEY WILL HAVE SOMETHING ELSE FOR YOU. JUST KNOW GOING IN THAT THEY ARE GOING TO PLAY HARD BALL. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: IT DOESN'T HURT TO ASK BECAUSE WHEN WE DID THE IMPACT FEE STUDY AND THEY DID THE GROWTH PLAN, WE WERE SLOTTED FOR A STATION SOMEWHERE ON 951 AND MAINSAIL. I THINK WE ARE GOING TO NEED A SECOND STATION WITHIN THE NEXT 5 - 10 YEARS. 1 JERRI NEUHOUSE: GOING UP TO 951. 16,1 RIGHT AND THEY DON'T NECESSARILY OWN THE LAND I DON'T THINK THEY OWN THAT. SO GOOD LUCK. 1t MALE VOICE: WITH THE NUMBERS YOU HAVE REPORTED ON BUILD OUT, MAINSAIL IS GOING TO BE BIGGER THAN CAPRI. JERRI NEUHOUSE: NO, 114 TIMES 5 IS ABOUT 500 CONDOS AND ADD THE COACH HOMES - IT WILL BE CLOSE AND IT WILL BE DEMANDING. ADMITTEDLY, MOST OF OUR CALLS ARE NOT CONDO CALLS, BUT WITH MEDICAL CALLS AND EVERYTHING THAT IS NOT A DIFFERENCE. BUT NEITHER ARE MARCO' S, THEY DON'T TYPICALLY HAVE HIGH RISE CALLS THAT OFTEN. BUT, THEY WILL BE A BIG PLAYER IN YOUR FIRE DEPARTMENT BECAUSE THEY WILL BE PAYING A LOT OF TAX. MALE VOICE: UNCLEAR WHICH RAISES THE QUESTION, DID WE EVER GET ANYBODY JERRI NEUHOUSE: I ACTUALLY SPEND EVERY NIGHT ON MAINSAIL DRIVE. THAT'S WHERE I HAVE SLEPT FOR THE PAST 21/2 YEARS. IT IS PROBABLY TIME TO GET SOMEONE WHO IS A REGISTERED OWNER OVER THERE FOR THE BOARD. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: EVERY TIME THAT THERE IS AN OPENING, IT IS ADVERTISED THRU THE COUNTY. JERRI NEUHOUSE: IT IS PROBABLY TIME TO GET PEOPLE MORE INVOLVED OVER THERE. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: AND FROM FIDDLER'S CREEK, TOO. JERRI NEUHOUSE: BECAUSE FAIRWAYS AND MAINSAIL 1, 2 3& 4, THOSE UNITS ARE IN FACT PART OF THE DISTRICT. TROPIC SCHOONER IS NOT. THE NEW CLUB HOUSE WILL BE IN THE DISTRICT. I WOULD SAY THAT IT IS PROBABLY WORTH TALKING TO HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION AND SEE IF WE CAN'T GET SOME INVOLVEMENT THERE. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: DO THEY HAVE MONTHLY MEETINGS OR ANYTHING? JERRI NEUHOUSE: NO THEY ARE NOT MONTHLY. THEY HAD A COUPLE OF MEETINGS OVER THIS AVERSONA THING AND THEY DO HAVE REGULAR MEETINGS BUT IT IS A VERY INACTIVE BOARD. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I'VE BEEN INQUIRING WITH FIDDLER'S CREEK ALSO TO SEE IF THEY HAD ANY TYPE OF CIVIC OR HOME ASSOCIATION AND THEY DON'T. OR AT LEAST, NOT YET. 16J JERRI NEUHOUSE: THEY DO HAVE A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION - FAIRWAYS HAS ONE AND MAINSAIL COMPLEX - 1, 2 3 & 4 HAVE ASSOCIATIONS. THEY DON'T HAVE A COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION LIKE WE DO. NOR DO THEY HAVE A CIVIC CENTER OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IT IS SOMETHING THAT OVER THE COURSE OF THE NEXT FEW MONTHS, WE MIGHT WANT TO START NETWORKING AND LET THEN KNOW ABOUT THEIR FIRE DEPARTMENT AND GETTING THEM INVOLVED. AND THROUGH ATTRITION, WE MAYBE SHOULD ACTIVELY LOOK FOR RECRUITS FOR THE BOARD FROM THERE. KEVIN IS RIGHT, IT IS GOING TO BE COMPARABLE TO CAPRI. MALE VOICE: WHAT IS THE POPULATION OF FIDDLER'S CREEK? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: IT IS UNDETERMINED BECAUSE THEY ARE STILL EXPANDING. I HAVE TALKED TO FIDDLER'S CREEK AND THEY DON'T KNOW YET EVEN HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE LIVING THERE NOW. BUT, THEY JUST KEEP BUILDING. MALE VOICE: THERE ARE NOT A LOT OF FULL TIME RESIDENTS THERE. JERRI NEUHOUSE: IF I KNEW THE SUBDIVISION NAMES WITHIN FIDDLER'S CREEK I CAN RUN A MLS REPORT THAT WILL SHOW THE NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS. THEY ARE TAXPAYERS FOR OUR DISTRICT. IF ROD CAN PROVIDE ME WITH THE SUBDIVISION NAMES. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I AM WORKING WITH FIDDLER'S CREEK NOW TO PUT IN AEDs (AUTOMATIC EXTERNAL DEFIBULATOR) IN SO THAT THE SECURITY GUARD WILL HAVE AN AED, THE CLUBHOUSE WILL HAVE ONE AND I WILL BE TRAINING ALL THEIR STAFF WITHIN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS. THEY HAVE PURCHASED 5 AED UNITS FOR FIDDLER'S CREEK. JERRI NEUHOUSE: IF WE DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER BUSINESS, LET'S TAKE A BREAK BEFORE WE START ON THE LETTER. REMEMBER, YOU CAN'T TALK ABOUT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. 11 BOARD TAKES A SHORT BREAK BOARD RE-CONVENES DISCUSSION BETWEEN ALL MEMBERS CONCERNING WHAT TO INCLUDE IN THE LETTER TO THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUESTING THAT THE NEXT STEPS BE TAKEN TO AMEND THE ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE MILLAGE RATE BE TAKEN AND WITH THE FIRE BOARD'S CONCERNS REGARDING THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR THE "TWO IN AND TWO OUT" RULE. 16J 1t ALL BOARD MEMBERS AGREE TO THE CONTENTS OF THE LETTER. THERE ARE NO OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION MOTION TO ADJOURN IS MADE, AND SECONDED. MEETING ADJOURNED BOARD AND CITIZENS' OPEN DISCUSSION PUB ~ P~E 0~01 ' °lli°r G°unt 63 1 CDBG Citizens Advisory Ta,s,..,k Force I I I IIIIIII The Citizens Advisory Task Force (CATF) was formed to assist with program planning, implementation and assessment regarding the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program in Collier County (over $2 million in annual funding from the U,.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development). The meetings are open to the public. For additional information contact Lee Combs at 659-5750 or Susan Alden at 403-2339. September 12, 2002 - 4:00 PM Community Development and Environmental Services Building Conference Room "E" 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 I Agenda I I. Call Meeting to Order [[. Introduction of new CDBG staff III. Approval of Meeting Minutes A, Approval of May 9, 2002 Meeting Minutes IV, Old Business A. Update on status of 2001-2002 CDBG projects B. Update on status of 2002-2003 CDBG projects .. C. Extension for Small Cities and Counties program - Immokalee Manufacturing Facility V. New Business VI. Announcements A. CATF Terms B. Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) FY 2001- 2002 C. Timeline of FY 03-04 CDBG cycle D. Subrecipient training in November E. Next CATF meeting at 1:00 p.m. on December'ii 2 *, 2002 for review of' ' applications and recommendations for funding, Misc. C0rres;. VII. Adjournment of Meeting C~rter Henning .... C_/oyle ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE / RESCU~°lett" -~~ '1 ADVISORY BOARD SUMMARY ~ECEI~E~~', APRIL 4, 2002 MEETING CALLED TO ORDER BY CHAIR ATTENDING: JIM LEWIS GARY GRIFFIS TARA LaGRAND JERRI NEUHOUSE: CHIEF RODRIGUEZ ~O&r~ o'F Coi.mt,i (;omm i ss iAner~, VICTOR HILL, MARCO EAGLE ABSENT: DAVID EILER JERRI NEUHOUSE:: IF I UNDERSTAND ROD, WE ARE GOING TO SKIP THE CHIEF'S REPORT AND GO STRAIGHT TO OLD BUSINESS AND THEN NEW BUSINESS. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS? IT IS BECAUSE OF THIS BUDGET THING. NO OBJECTIONS CHIEF'S REPORT A. OPERATIONS REPORT B. VOLUNTEER REPORT C. TRAINING REPORT D. BUDGET REPORT Misc. Corres: Date: : Item# 1(I~ I lbJ 1 OLD BUSINESS CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I'M SORRY THAT I DID NOT HAVE TIME TO MAKE COPIES FOR ALL, BUT THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DID APPROVE THE EXTENSION FOR THE "TWO IN TWO OUT" RULE AND IT HAS BEEN SENT TO THE STATE. I HAVE ONE COPY SIGNED BY THE CHAIRMAN. WE HAVE SIX MONTHS TO COMPLY. ALSO, I AM IN RECEIPT OF LETTERS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS. ONE IS FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD TO ALL OF THE CAPRI BOARD MEMBERS. "I VERY MUCH APPRECIATE YOUR LETTER OF MARCH 7TM, 2002 REGARDING THE PROPOSED MILLEAGE INCREASE. THIS ITEM IS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR MARCH 26, 2002" WHICH IS ALREADY PASSED AND THE COMMISSION GAVE DIRECTION TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY AND TO COUNTY STAFF TO DRAW UP THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE. I ALSO HAVE LETTER FROM THE COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE ADDRESSED TO THE ISLES OF CAPRI BOARD IN REFERENCE TO THE LETTER SENT. JERRI NEUHOUSE::: LETTER READS "DEAR MS. NEUHOUSE, IT WAS A PLEASURE TO SEE YOU AGAIN AT THE RECENT MEETING OF THE ISLES OF CAPRI CIVIC ASSOCIATION. COMMISSIONER FIALA HAS ASKED ME TO TAKE A MOMENT TO PROVIDE A BRIEF UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE TWO ITEMS WHICH YOUR ADVISORY BOARD HAS REQUESTED COUNTY COMMISSION ACTION IN YOUR MARCH 7TM CORRESPONDENCE. PROPOSED MILLAGE INCREASE: ON MARCH 26' 2002, THE COUNTY COMMISSION AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE DISTRICT'S OPERATING BUDGET MILLAGE CAP FROM 1 MIL TO 2 MILS. ONCE THE COUNTY ATTORNEY HAS PREPARED THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, IT WILL BE ADVERTISED AS REQUIRED BY LAW, AND SUBSEQUENTLY, SCHEDULED AS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM ON THE REGULAR COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA. I HAVE ASKED CHIEF RODRIGUEZ TO WORK CLOSELY WITH THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO BRING THIS ITEM TO COMPLETION AND TO KEEP THE ISLES OF CAPRI ADVISORY BOARD ADVISED AS WARRANTED. CERTIFICATION OF INABILITY TO COMPLY WITH TWO IN TWO OUT RULE: ON MARCH 26, 2002, THE COUNTY COMMISSION AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE AND TRANSMIT TO THE STATE THE REFERENCED CERTIFICATION. THE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN TRANSMITTED. WITH REGARDS TO THIS SUBJECT, YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN KNOWING THAT THE LEGISLATION PROPOSING THAT THE STATE ADOPT THE TWO IN TWO OUT RULE DIED IN THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING & INSURANCE LAW ON MARCH 22ND AND THEREFORE, HAS NOT AT THIS TIME BEEN IN ACTED INTO LAW. I TRUST THIS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES 2 THOSE ITEMS OF INTEREST TO THE ADVISORY BOARD. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF NEEDED." JERRI NEUHOUSE::: THAT IS VERY INTERESTING. I HAVE TWO COMMENTS TO THIS. 1) I HAD TOLD LEO OCHS OUTSIDE THE MEETING JUST BECAUSE THERE IS A WAY, A COUNTY CODE IS A COUNTY CODE WHETHER YOU CAN GET AROUND IT OR NOT. WHETHER YOU CAN GET AN EXEMPTION. IN MY VIEW, A MANDATE IS A MANDATE WHETHER OR NOT YOU CAN GET AROUND IT. IT MAKES IT NO LESS OF A MANDATE JUST LIKE IT MAKES IT NO LESS OF A CODE IF YOU CAN GET A VARIANCE. I THOUGHT IT WAS INAPPROPRIATE OF HIM TO IMPLY THAT WE DIDN'T NEED IT JUST BECAUSE WE COULD GET AROUND IT. HOWEVER, THE FACT THAT CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I HAVE NOT HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT THAT. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: IF IT HAS IN FACT DIED AND IS NOT BEEN IN ACTED INTO LAW, THEN YOU NEED TO, WE NEED TO GET SOME CLARIFICATION ON THREE ISSUES: 1) IS IT GOING TO BE A LAW? 2) IS JUST GOING TO BE A RECOMMENDATION? AND WILL IT STILL AFFECT OUR ISO RATING? IN WHICH CASE TO ME, IT IS STILL A MANDATE. I MEAN, IF OUR INSURANCE RATES ARE GOING TO GO UP BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE IT, WE STILL NEED IT. 3) WHAT DOES THIS MEAN NOW THAT WE HAVE THIS 6 MONTH EXTENSION? IF IT HASN'T BEEN IN ACTED INTO LAW, WE ACTUALLY HAVE MORE THAN THAT. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: USUALLY, THEY SEND US A FAX IMMEDIATELY. I DON'T KNOW WHERE HE RECEIVED HIS INFORMATION. BUT THEY SENT US INFORMATION THAT WE HAD TO FILL OUT BECAUSE OF THE EXTENSION A COUPLE DAYS AGO. IT HAD TO BE IN YESTERDAY, SO WE HAD TO FAX IT BACK. I DON'T KNOW WHERE HE GOT HIS INFORMATION THAT IT DIED. NO BODY THAT I HAVE SPOKEN, I HAVE SPOKEN TO OTHER CHIEFS AND THEY HAVEN'T HEARD THAT IT DIED. WE WOULD HAVE RECEIVED SOMETHING IN THE MAIL. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: IS THERE SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN DO TO CONFIRM FOR US? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES. MALE VOICE: WAS THIS NOT A MATTER OF LAW, BUT A MATTER OF REGULATION? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, BY OSHA AND FPA. MALE VOICE: WHICH DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ACT OF ...... UNCLEAR AND IT SEEMS TO ME, THAT WE ARE STILL BEING MANDATED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE. THAT'S WHAT I THINK YOU HAVE TO GET CLARIFICATION ON. JUST BECAUSE THERE WAS MAYBE A PARALLEL PIECE OF LEGISLATION GOING 16J TO COMMITTEES THAT DID NOT GET OUT OF COMMITTEE, THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS OF OSHA. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: RIGHT, BECAUSE THAT'S FEDERAL. THIS IS STATE. IT DOESN'T CHANGE MY DIRECTION, I JUST WANT MORE SPECIFICS NOW. DO WE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE ON THE TWO IN AND TWO OUT RIGHT NOW? MALE VOICE: CLARIFY FOR ME THE PROPOSAL TO GO TO THE 2 MIL CAP IS NOW BEING DRAWN UP OFFICIALLY? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, ON THE 23TH IT WILL BE ON THE COMMISSION AGENDA. I HAVE TO BE THERE IN CASE THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS THAT THE COMMISSIONERS MAY HAVE. I THINK IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA IF WE HAD SOME TYPE OF REPRESENTATION FROM OUR BOARD. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: THAT IS APRIL 23TH? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES JERRI NEUHOUSE:' I AM GOING TO BE IN A CLASS THE 22N° THRU THE 26TM MALE VOICE: WHAT TIME OF DAY? JERRI NEUHOUSE:: IT STARTS AT 9:00. WE DON'T EXACTLY WHEN IT WILL BE UP. I HAVEN'T RECEIVED AN AGENDA YET. WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO TELL ABOUT WHAT TIME FROM THE PRINTED AGENDA. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THAT JIM KNOWS. ROD, MAKE SURE THAT ONCE YOU GET THE AGENDA JERRI NEUHOUSE:: IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT ONLY ONE PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED. IF THE COMMISSIONERS PASS IT ON THE 23RD, THEN IT IS IN PLACE. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THERE. SO YOU WILL BE THERE AND HOPEFULLY JIM WILL BE CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I HAVE NOT HEARD ANYTHING FROM ANY OF THE RESIDENTS. I DON'T KNOW IF ANY OF YOU HAVE HEARD ANYTHING? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: HARRY ROGERS PUT IN HIS LATEST LITTLE ARTICLE "NOW THAT THE FIRE ISSUE IS BEHIND US WE CAN MOVE ON TO OTHER THINGS" THAT'S WHAT IT SAYS IN THE SUN TIMES. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: CAN WE GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO THE BUDGET? l_6J NEW BUSINESS CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I HAVE TO HAVE A PROPOSED OR DRAFT BUDGET BY APRIL 8TM. IT IS ALMOST COMPLETED. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: BEFORE YOU GO ANY FURTHER WITH THAT, WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY WE ARE ONLY GOING TO HAVE 4 DAYS TO DO A BUDGET THAT WE NORMALLY GET SEVERAL WEEKS TO DO. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I AM MEETING WITH THE BUDGET DIRECTOR TOMORROW AT 3:00. HE EXPLAINED TO ME THAT HE IS GOING TO HAVE OUR EXPANDED LEVEL OF SERVICE DONE FOR US SUCH AS THE PERSONNEL COSTS SO WE WON'T HAVE TO PLUG THAT IN. HE WILL HAVE ALL THOSE NUMBERS FOR US FOR THE EXPANDED REQUEST IF THE MILLAGE GOES THROUGH. WE WILL ALREADY HAVE THAT IN PLACE. HE HAS ALL THE NUMBERS. THAT'S GOING TO HELP US. JERRI NEUHOUSE::NORMALLY WE HAVE WEEKS TO DO THIS. TARA LaGRAND: YOU JUST SAID DRAFT, RIGHT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT. I HAVE TO PRESENT SOMETHING TO MR. PINEAU ON THE 8TM. THAT IS THE SCHEDULE FOR NON-EMS EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENTS. HE IS AWARE THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE COMPLETED BY THE 8TM, BUT HE NEEDS TO SEE SOMETHING BY THEN. WE BASICALLY HAVE EVERYTHING AND I BELIEVE THE MAJORITY OF IT WILL BE DONE TOMORROW. I AM HAVING THE BUDGET DIRECTOR, OUR BUDGET ANALYST IS NO LONGER WITH THE COUNTY, WHO IS A PRO TO HELP ME. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: HOW LONG HAVE YOU HAD THIS? A COUPLE OF DAYS? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: TUESDAY, I BELIEVE AND I CALLED YOU ALL. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: OK, I JUST COPIED THE FILE AND SAVED THE ORIGINAL. WE ARE WORKING ON A SEPARATE FILE. I THINK WE NEED SOME CLARIFICATION. THIS BUDGET THAT WE ARE DOING NOW IS BASED ON THE 1 MIL THAT WE'RE GETTING, IS BASED ON THE AD VALOREM THAT WE GOT LAST JUNE. THIS BUDGET IS AS THOUGH WE GOT NO INCREASE. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT MALE VOICE SO WE ARE DEALING WITH EXACTLY THE SAME FIGURES WE DID A YEAR AGO? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THEY ARE PRETTY MUCH THE EXACT SAME NUMBERS. 5 16J JERRI NEUHOUSE:: CAN YOU PRINT COPIES OUT SO THAT WE CAN ALL LOOK AT IT AS WE WORK ON IT? CHIEF RODtLIGUEZ: YES. THE EXPANDED LEVEL OF SERVICE, WHICH IS JUST THE COST OF THE PERSONNEL. THE REMAINDER OF THE MONEY WILL GO INTO RESERVES OR THE OPERATING. THAT PART THE BUDGET DIRECTOR IS GOING TO INPUT FOR ME TOMORROW. MALE VOICE: SO WE WILL HAVE TO DO AN AMENDED BUDGET AT SOME POINT, ONCE THE MILLEAGE RATE ... CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: ONCE IT GOES INTO PLACE, IT WILL HAVE THE EXPANDED LEVEL OF SERVICE, SO WE DON'T REALLY DON'T HAVE TO DO AN AMENDED. WHAT WILL HAPPEN IS THAT WE SHOW ON THE BUDGET THE REQUESTED EXPANDED LEVEL OF SERVICE IF WE GO TO 1.5. IF WE GO TO 1.5, IT WILL BE IN PLACE AND WE DON'T HAVE TO DO ANYTHING. WE ARE ONLY GOING TO OPERATE AT 1.5 MIL. MALE VOICE: IF THEY APPROVE THE 1.5, WHEN DOES IT GO INTO EFFECT? JERRI NEUHOUSE:: IN OCTOBER WHEN THEY START COLLECTING AD VALOREM TAXES. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: ON OCTOBER 1sT, IF THE 1.5 MIL AND THE BUDGET ARE APPROVED, WE COULD START HIRING PERSONNEL. MALE VOICE: UNCLEAR ...... SOMEWHAT LARGER BASE FOR AD VALOREM THAN LAST YEAR? JERRI NEUHOUSE:: YES, LAST YEAR WE DIDN'T ANY AD VALOREM NUMBERS TO REALLY WORK WITH. WE DIDN'T GET THOSE UNTIL JUNE AFTER THE BUDGET HAD BEEN SUBMITTED. THIS YEAR WE HAVE ACTUAL AD VALOREM FROM LAST YEAR. MALE VOICE: HAVE WE MORE IMPACT FEES? UNCLEAR CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, THAT IS HOW WE WERE ABLE TO PURCHASE THE TRUCK. WE BOUGHT THE MARCO ISLAND TRUCK, WE JUST RECEIVED IT, WITH IMPACT FEES. WE ARE GOING TO PURCHASE EQUIPMENT FOR IT FROM IMPACT FEES. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: WE DON'T ADDRESS THE IMPACT FEES IN THIS BUDGET? ALL WE ARE ADDRESSING IS CAPITAL? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT. 1 6 16J JERRI NEUHOUSE:: WE CAN ONLY USE THE IMPACT FEES FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS OR NEW CAPITAL PURCHASES? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: CORRECT. THE MAIN THING WE NEED TO WORK ON IS THE FORECAST. THAT IS WHAT I NEED TO SHOW ON THE gTH. MALE VOICE: HOW MUCH FOR THE TRUCK FROM MARCO? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WE BOUGHT IT FOR $31,000. AND WE OWE NOTHING ON IT. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: HOW MUCH IS LEFT IN IMPACT FEES? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: $25,000. JERRI NEUHOUSE:: IS THAT GOING TO BE ENOUGH TO OUTFIT IT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES. MALE VOICE: WHAT IS THE STORY ON THE BRUSH TRUCK. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THAT IS OUR BRUSH TRUCK THAT WE RECEIVED FREE FROM THE HOSPITAL AND THE COUNTY BOUGHT THE EQUIPMENT - THE TANK, PUMP, ETC. THE COUNTY SPENT $25,000 TO EQUIP THE TRUCK. WE HAD THE TRUCK OUT ON THE BRUSH FIRE THIS AFTERNOON. MALE VOICE: WHAT'S THE ONE OUT ON THE CORNER? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I GOT THAT ONE FREE, TOO FROM THE HOSPITAL. WE EQUIPPED IT WITH ALL THE SPARE DIVE GEAR. IT IS A SPECIAL RESPONSE UNIT THAT WE CAN HOOK THE LITTLE BOAT TO AND LAUNCH FROM ANYWHERE IN THE COUNTY FOR SALLOW WATER RESCUE OR DIVE CALLS. WE HAVE ALL THE DIVE TANKS AND CHARTS - EVERYTHING FOR WATER RESCUE IS IN THE TRUCK. IT IS ACTUALLY AN OLD MILITARY AMBULANCE AND THERE IS ROOM FOR THE DIVERS TO CHANGE INTO OR OUT OF WET SUITS. WE HAVE TWO BRUSH TRUCKS - ONE YOU WOULD CALL A "HEAVY" WHICH IS A 6 X 6, 5 TON AND A "LIGHT" WHICH IS THE SMALL ONE. WE HAVE THE NEW ATTACK TRUCK. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHERE ARE WE PUTTING ALL THIS? CH I'M GETTING IT GEARED UP FOR WHEN WE BUILD THE STATION ON MAINSAIL AND 951. JERRI NEUHOUSE: HAVE YOU TALKED TO ANYONE ABOUT THAT? 1 16J CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO YET. I NEED TO GET WITH YOU ON THAT. '~ JERRI NEUHOUSE: WE NEED TO GET CRACKING SOON. THE SALES CENTER IS ALREADY BUILD AND OPENED. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WELL, THEY HAVE TO GO THROUGH PERMITTING FOR THE BUILDINGS. MALE VOICE: UNCLEAR JERRI NEUHOUSE: I THOUGHT THAT THERE WAS SOME RULE ... CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: BASICALLY, WITH BIG DEVELOPMENTS THEY JERRI NEUHOUSE: IF IT'S A PUD, THEN I WOULD THINK THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO MAKE SPACE FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES. MALE VOICE: UNCLEAR... THE COUNTY REQUIRES, THE COUNTY UNCLEAR CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I HAVE GOTTEN WITH LEO OCHS AND HE WANTS TO MAKE SURE THAT BEFORE THEY START PULLING PERMITS THAT WE SIT DOWN WITH THEM. JERRI NEUHOUSE: YOU NEED TO COME BY AND THAT LITTLE PACKET OF UNCLEAR FROM ME TOMORROW. JUST FOR SOME CLARIFICATION, WE ARE LOOKING AT THE 02-03, CORRECT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: CORRECT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: AND IT LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVE PLUGGED IN ALL THE NUMBERS. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THEY ALREADY PLUGGED IN THE AD VALOREM BUT THEY ARE USING THE CURRENT YEAR'S AD VALOREM. THEY HAVE TO DO IT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: THAT WAS OUR PROBLEM LAST YEAR. THEY USED THE CURRENT AD VALOREM. WE KNOW THE AD VALOREM IS GOING TO GO UP AGAIN JUST LIKE LAST YEAR. WE KNOW THAT WE ARE ACTUALLY GOING TO HAVE MORE REVENUE BUT WE CAN'T BUDGET THAT WAY. MALE VOICE: BASED ON THE RATE OR MORE PROPERTY? JERRI NEUHOUSE: HIGHER VALUE AND MORE SALES. TWIN DOLPHINS HAS HAD LOTS OF SALES, ONLY 9 UNITS LEFT. JUST LIKE LAST YEAR, WE ARE GOING TO SEE, NOT AS SIGNIFICANT OR AS BIG A JUMP THIS YEAR. 1 CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WE MIGHT BECAUSE OF FIDDLER'S CREEK WE HAVE MORE HOMES THERE NOW AND WE SHOULD BE RECEIVING THE TAXES THIS YEAR. WE WON'T GET THE NEW FIGURES LrNTIL JULY. THE ACTUAL AD VALOREM FIGURES. MALE VOICE: AND WHAT HAPPENS IN JULY, WE PLUG IN THE PROPER FIGURES? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THE COUNTY WILL DO THAT JERRI NEUHOUSE: AND APPLY THEM TO THE EXPANDED SERVICES? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO NOW IS BASED ON THE AD VALOREM WE GOT LAST YEAR TO DO THIS YEAR'S BUDGET. I NOTICE THAT THEY HAVE PLUGGED IN TONS OF NUMBERS BUT IT DOESN'T BALANCE. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT, IT DOESN'T BALANCE AND WE CAN'T CHANGE THE NUMBERS. JERRI NEUHOUSE: LAST TIME THEY ONLY LET US CHANGE ABOUT 10 FIELDS. MALE VOICE: WE HAD TO JUGGLE MOST OF IT AROUND. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: IT SEEMS LIKE EVERY YEAR THAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING THIS, THE COUNTY IS PLUGGING IN MORE NUMBERS FOR US. MORE SET NUMBERS THAT WE CAN'T PLAY WITH. MALE VOICE: UNCLEAR EVERYTHING HAS BEEN CHANGED. SO THIS IS REALLY A WORTHLESS DOCUMENT CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, ITS GOING TO CHANGE AT LEAST 3 - 4 TIMES. JERRI NEUHOUSE: YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO PUBLISH THIS, IT'S A DRAFT. THEY HAVE GIVEN IT TO US TO MODIFY. THERE ARE A LOT OF NUMBERS ON IT THAT WE CANNOT MODIFY. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I HAVE A SUGGESTION. I AM MEETING WITH THE BUDGET DIRECTOR TOMORROW AT 3:00, WE ARE GOING TO SIT DOWN, HE TOLD ME THAT HE HAD A ROUGH DRAFT ALREADY MADE FOR US. OF THE FORECAST & REQUEST. JERRI NEUHOUSE: THAT INCLUDES OUR EXPANDED SERVICE? 16J 1' CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES. MY SUGGESTION IS, WHY DON'T WE MEET MONDAY OR TUESDAY AND I PRESENT TO YOU WHAT THE BUDGET DIRECTOR PRESENTS TO ME. JERRI NEUHOUSE: OUR DRAFT HAS TO BE THERE ON MONDAY. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I COULD TELL KEN PINEAU TOMORROW TO SAY THAT I WILL HAVE IT TO YOU ON WEDNESDAY. THAT WAY, IF WE DON'T AGREE WITH SOMETHING THAT BUDGET PLUGS IN, OR IF WE HAVE A QUESTION, I COULD TAKE IT BACK TO HIM. LET HIM KNOWN WE HAVE A PROBLEM. NEED TO INCREASE THIS OR DECREASE THAT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHY DON'T WE GO AHEAD AND, AT LEAST, TAKE A LOOK AND PLUG IN OUR NUMBERS. I DON'T WANT TO JUST RUBBER STAMP WHAT THEY ARE RECOMMENDING. SO, THE COLUMN WE ARE CONCERNED WITH IS THE FORECAST AND REQUESTED CURRENT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES MALE VOICE: THE VERY FIRST ITEM IS A REDUCTION JERRI NEUHOUSE: YOU'RE RIGHT, IT IS. WHY IS THAT? THE VERY FIRST REQUESTED CURRENT IS LESS THAN WHAT WE ARE FORECASTING FOR THIS YEAR FOR SALARIES. MALE VOICE: IT IS DOWN BY 4,900, HOW COME? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I DON'T HAVE AN ANSWER TO THAT, IT CAME STRAIGHT FROM THE BUDGET OFFICE. JERRI NEUHOUSE: CAN WE MODIFY IT? MALE VOICE: YOU ARE MEETING WITH THE DIRECTOR TOMORROW, ARE YOU GOING TO BRING UP THESE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHY IS THERE A REDUCTION? MALE VOICE THE FIRST NUMBER IS A FORECAST, MAYBE THEY ARE RUNNING BEHIND ON THE FORECAST AND THEY ARE JUST PLUGGING IN A NUMBER ........ CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YOU COULD BE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. THE AMENDED BUDGET, THE ADOPTED BUDGET FOR THIS LAST YEAR WAS $135600. HOW IS IT 10 16J 1 THAT WE HAVE GONE OVER, OH, BECAUSE WE HIRED THE OTHER GUY. OUR BUDGET DOES NOT INCLUDE THE 4TM GUY, DID IT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO, WHAT HAPPENED IS THAT WHEN THEY DID THE SALARIES SURVEYS, IN THE MIDDLE OF THE YEAR, FOR SIDE ONE OF TAPE ENDS SIDE TWO BEGINS JERRI NEUHOUSE: HOW DO WE DO THIS? WHERE DOES THAT MONEY COME FROM? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RESERVES JERRI NEUHOUSE: RESERVES FROM LAST YEAR AND WE DID HAVE A CARRY- FORWARD. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THEY WERE EXPECTING IT TO JUMP UP, EVERY DEPARTMENT JUMPED UP. THEY DID NOT KNOW EXACTLY HOW MUCH UNTIL HALF WAY THROUGH THE YEAR. JERRI NEUHOUSE: THAT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN AGAIN THIS YEAR IS IT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO, IT'S JUST THE REGULAR ADJUSTMENT JERRI NEUHOUSE: THEY ARE FORECASTING FOR THIS LAST BUDGET YEAR 159 AND THEY ARE REQUESTING 154. I HAVE NO REAL PROBLEM WITH THAT. I AM CURIOUS HOW THEY CAME UP WITH THAT. IF THEY ARE FORECASTING 159 FOR THIS YEAR WHY THEY WOULDN'T AT LEAST FORECAST THE SAME AMOUNT FOR NEXT YEAR? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I DON'T KNOW. THE BUDGET OFFICE PLUGS IN THE NUMBERS FOR US WHICH IS A GOOD THING JERRI NEUHOUSE: NO, THERE'S A LOT OF OVERTIME, TOO. MALE VOICE: YOUR ARE JUST HOLDING THE OVERTIME AT THE SAME LEVEL AS LAST YEAR. FOR EXPENDITURES, THEY SHOULD BE UNCLEAR WE ARE FACED WITH A HIGHER WAGE HOW CAN YOU HAVE THE SAME NUMBER OF HOURS OF OVERTIME, PAY THEM MORE AND STILL HAVE THE SAME AMOUNT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: VERY GOOD QUESTION JERRI NEUHOUSE: THE OVERTIME DOES NOT ALLOW FOR SALARY INCREASES. UNLESS, THEY ARE ASSUMING WE ARE GOING TO HAVE LESS HOURS. 11 CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I THINK THEY ARE LOOKING AT THROUGH JANUARY. WE HAVE ONLY SPEND $3,184 IN OVERTIME WHICH IS NOT MUCH. JERRI NEUHOUSE: THE REST OF THE YEAR, THAT WOULD STILL BRING US UP OVER $10,000. WE ARE JUST NOW GOING INTO BRUSH FIRE SEASON, RIGHT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, BUT WE GOT REIMBURSED FOR THE BRUSHFIRES LAST YEAR JERRI NEUHOUSE: NOT TOTALLY REIMBURSED CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: JUST ABOUT ALL OF IT. WE GOT ABOUT $8,000 BACK LAST YEAR FROM FEMA. I DON'T THINK THAT WE CAN CHANGE THE BUDGET OFFICE FIGURES, BUT I CAN ASK. MALE VOICE: THE ISSUE SHOULD BE RAISED JERRI NEUHOUSE: WE CAN CHANGE IT. THEY DIDN'T PROTECT THE CELLS, THE FORECAST AND REQUESTED. IT LOOKS LIKE WE CAN CHANGE THEM. ISN'T THIS JUST WHAT THEY ARE RECOMMENDING OR ARE THEY DICTATING? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I THINK WE SHOULD GO WITH WHAT THEY FORECAST AND THEN QUESTION. I COULD RAISE THAT ISSUE BEFORE WE START CHANGING THE NUMBERS. THEY HAVE TO HAVE A REASON WHY. JERRI NEUHOUSE: IF YOU WILL GET US SOME CLARIFICATION ON HOW THEY ARRIVED AT THESE FIGURES, THAT WOULD BE ... CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THE OVERTIME IS GOING TO HAVE TO GO UP WHEN WE GO INTO THE EXPANDED. MALE VOICE: WHAT THEY ARE REQUESTING FOR CURRENT 02-03 IS $33,000 LESS THAN WHAT THE FORECAST WAS.'? JERRI NEUHOUSE: NO, IT'S 2445 IS THE FORECAST AND REQUEST 2427. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES. OH, YOU ARE LOOKING AT TOTAL... LET'S SEE WHERE THE GAPS, THE BIG GAP IS. MALE VOICE: THE IS A DIFFERENCE ON THE BOTTOM LINE OF $33,000 JERRI NEUHOUSE: THAT WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME AT ALL. LAST YEAR IT WAS $28,00. LET'S GO ONE BLOCK AT A TIME MALE VOICE: IT'S LESS 12 16J JERRI NEUHOUSE: I THINK WE RAN INTO SOMETHING SIMILAR LAST YEAR. THIS WHOLE NEXT SECTION, OPERATING EXPENSES. WE HAVE TO PLUG IN THOSE. THEY HAVE ONLY PLUGGED IN A FEW. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WE NEED TO START FROM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES. THERE ARE A LOT OF LINE ITEMS HERE THAT WE DON'T USE AND HAVE NEVER USED. JERRI NEUHOUSE: OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES WE SPEND 1250 SO FAR. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: AMENDED $3,170 JERRI NEUHOUSE: WE WANT TO FORECAST WHAT? THE AMOUNT THAT WAS BUDGETED? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THE AMOUNT THAT WAS BUDGETED JERRI NEUHOUSE: SO WE'LL SAY 3170. WHAT ARE THOSE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: HIRE SOME ONE TO DO SOMETHING THAT THE COUNTY DOESN'T DO. WHEN WE FIX SOMETHING. IT COULD BE CARPET CLEANING. JERRI NEUHOUSE: NON-COUNTY PROVIDED SERVICES. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES. THAT'S WHAT IT BASICALLY IS. MALE VOICE: TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES - SHOWS THROUGH JANUARY 83825 MULTIPLY BY 3 WOULD BE 251,475 AND SO ALL OF THESE NUMBERS ARE SHY BASED ON CURRENT CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: IF YOU LOOK AT THAT, WE CAN'T DO IT THAT WAY BECAUSE - LET'S SAY RETIREMENT. THAT IS ALL ONE LUMP SUM. SOCIAL SECURITY IS ONE LUMP SUM. IT IS NOT LIKE IT GOES UP EVERY MONTH. MALE VOICE: BUT THERE IS SOMETHING IN HERE THAT THEY ARE NOT NOW FORECASTING ENOUGH TO COVER OUR PRESENT LEVEL OF EXPENDITURES. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I THINK THAT IS ONLY THE REGULAR SALARIES. JERRI NEUHOUSE: THEIR FORECAST IS CORRECT. THEY WENT UP IN THE FORECAST TO EITHER EQUAL OR EXCEED THE AMENDED BUDGET. THE FORECAST FOR 10-02. THAT IS FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS YEAR THROUGH OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR. THE FORECAST EITHER EQUALS OR EXCEEDS THE AMENDED BUDGET EXCEPT ON RESERVE FOR SALARY ADJUSTMENTS. THEY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING FORECAST FOR THAT. THEY SAID THEY WON'T, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT DOING 13 16J THE SALARY SURVEY. THAT MAKES SENSE, THAT'S $18,000 RIGHT THERE. THE HEALTH INSURANCE LOOKS LIKE IT WENT DOWN ABOUT 1,000 OR 800 SOME DOLLARS. EVERYTHING ELSE EITHER EQUALS OR EXCEEDS. WHERE WE ARE SEEING THE BIG GAP IS THE RESERVE FOR SALARY ADJUSTMENTS. BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT DOING THE SALARY SURVEY THIS YEAR, THEY DID THAT LAST YEAR. MALE VOICE: IT'S ALSO 0 IN THE ACTUAL EXPENDITURE. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THAT'S TRUE, BUT IT WENT UP IN OUR REGULAR SALARIES. MAYBE THAT'S WHERE THEY MAKE UP FOR IT. MALE VOICE: AT THE END OF THE DAY, AT OUR CURRENT RATE OF EXPENDITURES, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OVER $251,000. THEY ARE SAYING THAT THE TOTAL FOR FISCAL YEAR - THE FORECAST FOR FISCAL YEAR 02-03 IS ONLY $242,270. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THAT IS WHAT WE ARE REQUESTING FOR 02-03, $242,700. JERRI NEUHOUSE: IT'S STILL SHY, WHICH IS WHAT HE IS SAYING. TAKE THIS NUMBER - THIS IS FOUR MONTHS OF ACTIVITY- MULTIPLY THIS TIMES 3 AND YOU WILL GET WHAT WE SHOULD BE SPENDING FOR THE WHOLE YEAR. IT EQUALS 251,000. SO THEY SHOULD HAVE FORECAST 251,000. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: BUT, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT YOU CAN MULTIPLY IT LIKE THAT BECAUSE THE RETIREMENT, SOCIAL SECURITY, HEALTH IS NOT BEING TAKEN OUT LIKE... JERRI NEUHOUSE: YES IT IS. RETIREMENT, SOCIAL SECURITY, HEALTH INSURANCE IS A PERCENTAGE OF SALARIES. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YEAR. BUT, THAT'S ALREADY BEEN TAKEN OUT FOR THE JERRI NEUHOUSE: NO, IT CAN'T HAVE BEEN. SOCIAL SECURITY MATCHING IS DONE EVERY TIME THE PAYCHECKS IS. ALL THAT STUFF IS PAID MONTHLY - SOCIAL SECURITY, HEALTH INSURANCE - EVEN WHEN IT IS A COUNTY ORGANIZATION. THEY CANNOT PAY FOR SOMEONE'S HEALTH INSURANCE, WHAT IF THEY FIRE THAT PERSON THREE MONTHS LATER? THEY CAN'T PAY FOR IT A YEAR IN ADVANCE. ALL THOSE THINGS ARE MONTHLY EXPENSES. SO THIS IS FOUR MONTHS OF ACTUAL SPENDING. THIS IS A QUARTER'S WORTH OF EXPENSES. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: ON OUR RETIREMENT, WE HAVE ALREADY SPENT THE 10,697 AND THEN THEY AMENDED 31,000. 14 16J JERRI NEUHOUSE: LOOKS, THAT'S WHY. BECAUSE IT IS GOING TO TRIPLE. WE SPENT 31,000 IN RETIREMENT LAST YEAR. THIS IS ACTUAL, THIS IS AN ACTUAL THIRD OF THE YEAR EXPENSES. IF YOU MULTIPLY THAT OR TRIPLE IT YOU HAVE 251,000 NOT 244,000. OUR QUESTION TO YOUR BUDGET DIRECTOR IS: HOW DO THEY ARRIVE AT THIS FORECAST? IT DOESN'T MATCH WHAT THE ACTUAL EXPENSES. YES, IT EXCEEDS THE ADOPTED BUDGET BUT THAT, THE BULK OF THAT IS FROM THEIR SALARY SURVEY. SO, WHY DOESN'T IT MATCH? AND, THEREFORE, ONCE THAT NUMBER IS CORRECT, THEN WE SHOULD HAVE A REASONABLE REQUESTED AMOUNT. THAT SHOULD EQUAL, AT A MINIMUM, WHAT OUR FORECAST IS FOR THIS YEAR. MALE VOICE: TAKE IT ONE STEP FURTHER. DO YOU KNOW ANY YEAR IN WHICH COSTS DON'T GO UP? JERRI NEUHOUSE: NO MALE VOICE: LOOKING AT CURRENT EXPENDITURES OF 251,400 SHOULDN'T WE SEE SOMETHING LARGER THAN THAT? JERRI NEUHOUSE: ABSOLUTELY. WE CERTAINLY SHOULD NOT BE LOOKING AT SOMETHING LESS. AND WE ARE WAY OFF. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I WILL BE SURE TO ASK WHERE THE NUMBERS CAME FROM. JERRI NEUHOUSE: THIS IS OBVIOUSLY... THESE ARE NOT HIS NUMBERS. HE SAID THAT HE HAS WORKED THIS BUDGET, RIGHT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THESE ARE HIS NUMBERS. I GOT THIS FROM THE BUDGET OFFICE. JERRI NEUHOUSE: BUT DIDN'T YOU SAY THE BUDGET DIRECTOR HAS WORKED THE NUMBERS FOR US CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THE REST OF THE NUMBERS, THAT ARE MISSING JERRI NEUHOUSE: HE HASN'T REWORKED ANY OF THESE? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO. JERRI NEUHOUSE: IS IT POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE, WHEN ARE YOU MEETING WITH HIM? TOMORROW? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT, AT 3:00 AT HIS OFFICE JERRI NEUHOUSE: IS THERE 1 15 CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: IF ANYBODY WANTS TO GO THAT'S FINE JERRI NEUHOUSE: I HAVE TO LET THE CABLE PERSON IN BETWEEN 2 AND 5 CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: DO YOU WANT TO GO? JERRI NEUHOUSE: I'D LIKE TO IF I CAN GET SOMEBODY TO DO THE CABLE THING. IF I CAN. DOES ANYBODY ELSE WANT TO GO? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WE WOULD HAVE TO ADVERTISE JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHY, WE ARE NOT VOTING ON ANYTHING.'? WE ARE JUST ASKING QUESTIONS. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WE ARE TALKING ABOUT DEPARTMENT ISSUES. EVEN IF WE DON'T VOTE ON IT. MALE VOICE: BUT, ANY ONE OF US CAN CALL YOU AT ANY TIME? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, WE CAN DO A "ONE ON ONE" ANYTIME. MALE VOICE: ONE PERSON, ONE BOARD MEMBER CAN BUT NOT TWO. JERRI NEUHOUSE: IF TODD CAN DO THE CABLE THING, I WILL GO WITH YOU. SO, IN THE MEANTIME, THOSE ARE QUESTIONS THAT WE HAVE FOR HIM. WHY IS THAT INCONSISTENT? LET'S GO AHEAD AND PLUG IN WHAT NUMBERS WE THINK WE SHOULD HAVE. WE PLUGGED IN 3170 FOR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES. WE BASICALLY HAD IT MATCH. MALE VOICE: WHERE ARE YOU GETTING THE 3170 FROM" JERRI NEUHOUSE: THAT WAS FROM THE AMENDED BUDGET CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THE AMENDED BUDGET FOR O1-02 JERRI NEUHOUSE: OUR ACTUAL EXPENDITURE IN 00-01 WAS 2,000 AND WE HAVE SPENT ABOUT 1,200. ACTUALLY, THAT PROBABLY OUGHT TO GO UP. BUT, I DON'T KNOW WHERE WE CAN GO UP UNTIL .... MALE VOICE: DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA OF WHERE WE ARE GOING TO BE MONEY WISE THIS YEAR? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: AS FAR AS THE AD VALOREM? I AND ALMOST GUARANTEE THAT WE WILL HAVE A MINIMUM 10% INCREASE. AT A MINIMUM 16 IN AD VALOREM. WE HAD 15 -20%. IT HAS BEEN LIKE THAT FOR THE LAST 3-4 YEARS. 16J LAST YEAR MALE VOICE: I DON'T THINK WE CAN COUNT ON IT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: ! DON'T THINK THAT WE CAN COUNT ON WHAT WE HAD LAST YEAR. I THINK WE CAN PROBABLY COUNT ON 8-10%. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, I CAN SEE US DOING THE 10% BECAUSE JERRI NEUHOUSE: DIDN'T WE GET 18% OR 20% LAST YEAR? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, IT WAS REAL CLOSE TO 20% INCREASE JERRI NEUHOUSE: WE DIDN'T BUDGET ANYTHING LAST YEAR FOR OUT OF COUNTY TRAVEL, PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT BUT WE SPENT $506 ALREADY. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT WE OUGHT TO BE BUDGETING SOMETHING. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, I JUST READ OVER THE INSTRUCTIONS AND WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BUDGET 1500 FOR ALL DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS. JERRI NEUHOUSE: SO, $1,500. SO DO WE NEED TO PLUG IN ANYTHING UNDER FORECAST OR JUST UNDER REQUESTED? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: UNDER REQUESTED. JERRI NEUHOUSE: IS IT REALLY ONLY REQUESTED THAT WE ARE CONCERNING OURSELVES WITH? THE MAIN THING IS THE FORECAST. SAY HAVE NEVER BEEN BUDGETED? FOR OUT OF CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: MALE VOICE: UNCLEAR COUNTY TRAVEL JERRI NEUHOUSE: MALE VOICE: FROM? ITS ALWAYS JUST BEEN EXPENDED. IF ITS BEEN EXPENDED, WHERE HAS THE MONEY COME CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: AT THE END OF THE BUDGET YEAR, WHEN EVER THEY ADD UP, IF YOU HAVE MONEY LEFT IN OTHER OPERATIONAL, THAT'S WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM. WHICH WE ALWAYS HAVE LIKE CARRY FORWARDED. SO BEFORE THEY MOVE IT ON, THE CARRY FORWARD, THEY PLUG IN THOSE NUMBERS ON THOSE LINE ITEMS. BUT, WE NEED TO BUDGET SOME WITHIN THAT. 17 JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHAT ARE WE FORECASTING FOR THIS YEAR? WE ARE BUDGETING $1,500 FOR THIS YEAR BECAUSE IT TELLS US TO. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WE NEED TO BRING THAT UP AND ROUND IT OFF. JERRI NEUHOUSE: TO WHAT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THE $1,500. JERRI NEUHOUSE: LET'S FORECAST $1,500. MOTOR POOL RENTAL CHARGE. WE SPENT $17 ON MOTOR POOL RENTAL CHARGE - WHAT IS THAT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WHENEVER YOU HAVE A TRUCK DOWN AND YOU NEED TO BORROW ONE, WE HAVE TO PAY. JERRI NEUHOUSE: NOW THAT WE HAVE ALL THESE TRUCKS WE DON'T NEED TO... CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: SO WE DON'T NEED TO BUDGET OR REQUEST FOR THAT. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: BUT, WE NEED TO FORECAST AND BRING THAT UP TO $20. WE NEED TO ROUND IT OFF. JERRI NEUHOUSE: TELEPHONE BEEPERS, BASE COST. WE ALREADY SPENT $534, WE ONLY BUDGETED $500 LAST YEAR. IF WE ALREADY SPENT $534 JUST SINCE JANUARY, AT THIS RATE THAT WILL BE $,1500. IS THAT A ONE TIME COST OR IS IT MONTHLY? IS THAT $500 SUPPOSED TO BE SPREAD OUT OVER A YEAR? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, BUT ! BELIEVE WE CALCULATED THAT WRONG. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHY, EACH OF THE OTHER YEARS IT WAS $4660, $300, $505. WHY WOULD IT GO MALE VOICE: UNCLEAR THAT WOULD TRIPLE, MORE THAN TRIPLE EXPENDITURES FOR THAT ITEM JERRI NEUHOUSE: IS IT BECAUSE OF ALL THE NEW NEXTELS? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO, I'M THE ONLY ONE WITH A NEXTEL. JERRI NEUHOUSE: MY POINT IS THIS, THE $534 SPENT, WILL THAT COVER US FOR THE YEAR? HAVE THEY ALREADY OR DO THEY BILL JUST ONCE A YEAR? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO, IT IS EVERY MONTH. 18 16J MALE VOICE: CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: MEN WITH PAGERS. MONTH. WHAT'S THE.MONTHLY FEE? $59 FOR THE NEXTEL AND I HAVE ALL OF THE PAID THAT IS FOUR OF THE UNCLEAR PAGERS AT $9.00 EACH PER JERRI NEUHOUSE: YEAR. MALE VOICE: SO, $59 AND $36 IS $95. THAT IS $1140 JUST IN BASE COSTS PER SO WE SHOULD BE PUNCHING IN $1200 JERRI NEUHOUSE: WE SHOULD FORECASTING ALTHOUGH WE ARE ALREADY AT $534. MALE VOICE: THERE MUST BE SOME UNUSUAL EXPENDITURES UNCLEAR CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THERE IS ONLY ONE PHONE AND FOUR PAGERS. ACTUALLY, TWO PHONES. WE HAVE ONE ON THE BOAT BUT WE NEVER USE IT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: YOU STILL HAD TO PURCHASE IT AND YOU ARE STILL PAYING A MONTHLY FEE FOR IT. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT MALE VOICE: WHAT'S THE MONTHLY FEE ON THAT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: ACTUALLY, THERE IS NO MONTHLY FEE ON THE OLD CELLULAR ONE. IF YOU USE IT, YOU PAY FOR THE AMOUNT OF CALLS. WE ARE UNDER THE OLD CONTACT WITH THAT PHONE. JERRI NEUHOUSE: YOU NEED TO ASK YOUR BUDGET GUY INCASE SOMEONE'S NOT THERE WITH YOU TOMORROW. WE NEED TO KNOW WHAT WE SPENT $534 ON. RIGHT NOW I'M GOING TO PLUG IN $1,500 AS FORECAST. MALE VOICE: THAT'S IF THAT $534 IS ACCURATE. IF IT IS ON GOING AND NOT SPECIAL. MALE VOICE: WAIT A MINUTE. LOOK AT BOTH LINE ITEMS. YOU HAVE TELEPHONE BEEPERS ON ONE LINE AND CELL PHONES ON ANOTHER? JERRI NEUHOUSE: AND YOU HAVE THE SAME PRICE HAPPENING CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT, THAT'S WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND. 19 16J 1 MALE VOICE: SO WE ARE OFF ON BOTH. THIS IS RIDICULOUS, BECAUSE NOW WE ARE TALKING $3,000 MALE VOICE: WHAT'S THIS - TELEPHONE SYSTEM SUPPORT ALLOCATION? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THAT'S OUR PHONES HERE. JERRI NEUHOUSE: THAT'S NOT BAD FOR A YEAR. AND YOU ARE RIGHT ON TARGET. MALE VOICE: YOU BETTER CHECK YOU BILLS AND MAKE SURE YOU ARE NOT GETTING A LOT OF LONG DISTANCE CALLS. JERRI NEUHOUSE: ONE IS PHONE AND ONE IS BEEPERS CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT, WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED A BILL ON THE BOAT PHONE BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T USED IT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHO PAYS THESE BILLS? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I GET THEM AND THEN SUBMIT THEM TO GET THEM PAID. JERRI NEUHOUSE: IT LOOKS LIKE MAYBE THEY HAVE BEEN, MAYBE THERE IS AN ERROR THERE. YOU NEED TO DOUBLE CHECK THAT THOSE ARE THE ACTUAL AMOUNTS. IF THOSE ARE ACTUAL AMOUNTS, THEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT TRIPLING CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THERE ARE ONLY TWO PHONES AND FOUR PAGERS. THE PAGERS A $9.00 EACH PER MONTH. MY NEXTEL IS $59.00 A MONTH. JERRI NEUHOUSE: THE PAGERS ARE $432 A YEAR. THAT'S JUST THE PAGERS. THE NEXTEL IS $708. WE'RE BACK UP TO $1,100. THAT'S IN KEEPING WITH THE NUMBERS SHOWN. WHY THE BIG CHANCE FROM LAST YEAR? WAIT A MINUTE, WE'VE GOT TO SEPARATE TELEPHONES FROM BEEPERS. BEEPERS SHOULD BE ABOUT $36 TIMES 12, SHOULD BE $432 A YEAR. WE ARE SHOWING THAT WE HAVE ALREADY SPENT $534 THIS YEAR ON BEEPERS. MALE VOICE: YOU HAVE MORE GUYS. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THERE ARE ONLY FOUR PAGERS. FOR ALL FOUR GUYS. JERRI NEUHOUSE: JUST ON THE BEEPERS, WE HAVE ALREADY EXCEEDED AN ENTIRE YEAR'S BUDGET IN THE FIRST QUARTER. CELLULAR TELEPHONES ARE $708 FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR AND WE HAVE ALREADY THREE QUARTERS OF THE WAY THROUGH THAT. 20 CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG. MALE VOICE: YOU NEED TO DOUBLE CHECK THE BILLS THAT YOU HAVE SENT AND DOUBLE CHECK THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT THEY HAVE ACTUALLY TAKEN OUT OF OUR BUDGET. MALE VOICE: IS THAT $59 PER MONTH FOR UNLIMITED CALLS? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES, WE HAVE A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT. JERRI NEUHOUSE: I DON'T WANT TO PLUG IN $1,500. MALE VOICE: YOU'VE GOT TO PLUG IN $1,500 ON BOTH TO DO THIS RIGHT. MALE VOICE: UNCLEAR COMMENTS JERRI NEUHOUSE: SHALL I PLUG IN THE NUMBER OR PUT A QUESTION MARK? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: I WOULD PUT IN A QUESTION MARK ON BOTH OF THEM MALE VOICE: ARE YOU WRITING DOWN WHAT IT SHOULD BE ON BOTH OF THOSE? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: NO. MALE VOICE: IT SHOULD BE $432 ON BEEPERS AND IT SHOULD BE $708 ON THE CELL PHONES. JERRI NEUHOUSE: OK, I AM PUTTING QUESTION MARKS IN HERE. THERE WILL BE TWO SPREADSHEETS, ROD. THE ORIGINAL ONE AND THEN THERE WILL BE OURS CALLED IOC. OURS IS GOING TO BE THE ONE YOU WANT TO GO OVER WITH HIM. SHOW HIM WHERE OUR QUESTIONS ARE. I AM PUTTING QUESTION MARKS ON THESE TWO ITEMS - THE WHOLE TOP SECTION IS ONE BIG QUESTION. TELEPHONE SYSTEM SUPPORT ALLOCATION- WE ARE ON TRACK WITH THAT. $748 TIMES 3 BRINGS US TO A LITTLE OVER $2,200. WHICH IS WHAT WE BUDGETED FOR THE YEAR. WE SPENT $2,146 LAST YEAR. I SHOULD THINK WE SHOULD GO $2,300 THIS YEAR. WE ARE ALREADY AT $2,240. WHAT DO YOU THINK. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: $2,300 FOR THE REQUEST? JERRI NEUHOUSE: $2,244 IS THE FORECAST. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: REMEMBER, WE NEED TO ROUND UP. ROUND UP TO 100's 21 16J 1 JERRI NEUHOUSE: THEN WE HAVE TO GO BACK UP TO THAT $3,170. THAT NEEDS TO BE $3,200. RIGHT NOW WE ARE JUST DOING FORECAST, RIGHT? WE ARE NOT DOING REQUESTS, CORRECT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WE COULD GO BACK AND FORTH. LET'S GO WITH THE $3,200 FOR REQUESTED, TOO MALE VOICE: THEN THERE IS THE REQUESTED EXPANDED. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THE EXPANDED IS JUST IF WE ARE GOING TO HIRE PEOPLE, OR WE ARE GOING TO BUY EQUIPMENT THAT WE ARE NOT BUDGETED FOR. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHY DON'T WE REQUEST $2,400 THEN SO THAT WE HAVE AN INCREASE. WE SEEM TO BE GOING UP ABOUT $100 EACH YEAR ON THAT ITEM, TELEPHONES. POSTAGE, FREIGHT AND UPS: WE HAVE NOT SPENT ANYTHING, WE HAVE $100 BUDGET. LET'S FORECAST $100 BECAUSE WE WILL PROBABLY SPEND THAT. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: AND REQUEST ANOTHER $100. JERR/NEUHOUSE: ELECTRICITY: YOU HAVE $4,000 BUDGETED. I DON'T KNOW WHY WHEN WE ACTUALLY SPENT $4,600 THE YEAR BEFORE. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: WE SPENT $1,072 MALE VOICE: AT THE CURRENT RATE WE ARE TALKING $3,260 MALE VOICE: BUT WE ARE COMING INTO THE SUMMER. JERRI NEUHOUSE: LET'S FORECAST $4,000 EXCEPT THAT WE SPENT $4,651 LAST YEAR. LET'S FORECAST $4,500. AND LET'S REQUEST $4,600? $4,800 FOR NEXT YEAR? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: LET'S GO WITH THE $4,700. JERRI NEUHOUSE: OK. WATER AND SEWER: THAT SHOULD TYPICALLY BE THE SAME, RIGHT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: RIGHT JERRI NEUHOUSE: WE SPENT $426 LAST YEAR, WE HAVE $500 BUDGETED, LET'S FORECAST FOR THE FULL $500. EVEN THOUGH WE ARE AT $101, WE ARE GETTING INTO THE WATERING SEASON AND STUFF LIKE THAT. CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: AND WE ARE GOING TO REQUEST $500 22 16J JERRI NEUHOUSE: LEASE/PURCHASE, BUILDINGS: NOTHING JERRI NEUHOUSE::RENTAL EQUIPMENT: NOTHING WHAT'S THIS LEASE PURCHASE, EQUIPMENT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: THAT IS THE ATTACK TRUCK. JERRI NEUHOUSE: HOW MUCH LONGER DO WE HAVE ON THAT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: ABOUT 3 MORE YEARS. $15,400 IS WHAT WE BUDGETED, WE SPENT THAT, SO JERRI NEUHOUSE: FORECAST $15,400. MALE VOICE: JERRI NEUHOUSE: IS THAT PAID, THAT'S A ONE LUMP PAYMENT? ONE LUMP PAYMENT, SO WE WILL DO $15,400 FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR. LEASE PAYMENTS IS CONSISTENT EACH YEAR? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES JERRI NEUHOUSE: GREAT, SO WE WILL MAKE THAT $15,400 LEASE/PURCHASE, DELL COMPUTERS: WE SPENT $557, WE BUDGETED $600 SO WE'LL FORECAST $600 AND WHAT ABOUT NEXT YEAR? THE SAME $600, IT'S A THREE YEAR LEASE, RIGHT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES JERRI NEUHOUSE: INSURANCE: BUDGETED $3,500, WE ARE REQUESTING DOUBLE THAT AMOUNT FOR NEXT YEAR. WHY IS THAT? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: INSURANCE WENT UP. THAT'S THEIR NUMBERS. WE COULD PUT A QUESTION MARK THERE. JERRI NEUHOUSE: BUT, THEY PUT IN ZERO UNDER AUTO INSURANCE? LOOKS LIKE THEY ARE LUMPING IT. WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS PUT 43,500 UNDER GENERAL AND $3,000 UNDER AUTO. MALE VOICE: SHOULDN'T AUTO UNCLEAR CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: YES MALE VOICE: UNCLEAR 23 16J MALE VOICE: YOUR GENERAL INSURANCE IS PROBABLY GOING TO STAY THE SAME, WHAT PROBABLY WENT UP IS THE AUTO. JERRI NEUHOUSE: WHAT DO WE DO? CHIEF RODRIGUEZ: UNCLEAR $3,00 IN ACCORDING TO THE BOOK HERE FOR TAPE ENDS BOARD AND CITIZENS' OPEN DISCUSSION 24 Fiala V/ Carter 16J Henning VED Coyle / _ Coletta O MENT .... Pelic~m B~y Services Division ao~ra of ,;~uat.y :..')r,.ais~:~cners 801 Laurel Oak Drive · Suite 605 · Naples, Florida 34108 · (239) 597-1749 · Fax (239) 597-4502 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD AT THE HAMMOCK OAK CENTER, 8962 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2002 at 3:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of the Minutes of the August 7, 2002 Regular Meeting 3. Sub-committee Reports Clam Bay Sub-Committee Clam Bay Annual Monitoring & Improvement Schedule - Annual Monitoring - Clam Bay 2002 Improvements Water Management System III & IV Rerouting Dune Restoration Interior Tidal Channels Clam Bay Plantings Alternative Plantings Cattail Removal Clam Bay Dredging - Manager's Selection Committee Discussion of RFP Ranking for Contract Manager Services 4. Administrator's Report Capital Projects Gulf Park Drive to Pelican Bay Boulevard (North Entrance) Irrigation & Landscape Improvements Community Issues U.S. 41 Median Landscaping Sidewalk Overlays and Repairs Pelican Bay Boulevard Intersection Crosswalks Pelican Bay Budget Public Hearing Financial Statement Review Audience Participation Committee Requests Discussion of Method of Paying for Services provided by Pelican Bay Services - Ad-Valorem Taxes or Special Assessments Requested by: Mr. Joseph Bawduniak Discussion of the type (Residential Vs. Commercial) of allocation of voting un!ts represented by the Registry Resort. Requested by: Mr. Joseph Bawduniak 8. Adjourn ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE. PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY ANDI~,~/~I~;UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ANY PERSON REQUIRING SPECIAL ACC~)~Ih~TO~O~A~I~NS AT THIS MEETING BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHOULD CONTACT DIVISION OFFICE AT (941) 597-1749 AT LEAST FIVE CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO '~. ~'"- MINUTES PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD MEETING August 7, 2002 Naples, Florida 16J 1 LET IT BE KNOWN, that the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met in Regular Session on this date, August 7, 2002 at 3:00 P.M. at Hammock Oak Center, 8962 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present: Mr. Lou Vlasho (Chairman) Mr. Joseph Bawduniak Mr. Thomas Brown Mr. James Burke Mr. James Carroll Mr. John Domenie Mr. Glen Harrell Mr. David Roellig Mr. Edward Staros Mr. Christopher Sutphin (Absent) Mr. George Werner ALSO PRESENT: Approximately six (6) Pelican Bay residents, Mr. James P. Ward, Division Administrator, Pelican Bay Services Division and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of the Minutes of the July 3, 2002 Regular Meeting 3. Sub-committee Reports - Clam Bay Sub-Committee Clam Bay Annual Monitoring & Improvement Schedule Cattail Removal Dune Restoration Manager's Selection Committee Contract Manager Services 4. Administrator's Report Capital Projects - Gulf Park Drive to Pelican Bay Boulevard (North Entrance) Irrigation & Landscape Improvements Community Issues - U.S. 41 Median Landscaping - Sidewalk Overlays and Repairs Pelican Bay Budget Public Hearing 5. Financial Statement Review 6. Audience Participation 7. Committee Requests 8. Adjourn ROLL CALL Mr. V|asho called the meeting to order and asked that the record show Mr. Christopher Sutphin with an excused absence. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 3~ 2002 REGULAR MEETING Mr. Werner moved, seconded by approved unanimously the Minutes regular Meeting. Mr. Bawduniak and of the July 3, 2002 4948 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 1 SUB-COMMITTEE REPORTS CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE CLAM BAY ANNUAL MONITORING & IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE Mr. Roellig explained that the Clam Bay Sub-committee met on July 17, 2002 and reviewed the Monitoring and Improvement Schedule and everything appears to be running on track. Mr. Roellig stated, "1 don't know if the flap gates have been removed or not, as you cannot get to the site due to the construction being done on Seagate Drive". CATTAIL REMOVAL Mr. Roellig stated, "Cattail removal is part of the Clam Bay Management plan and the Sub-committee voted to recommend to the Board that they move forward with the rehabilitation of the north cattail area". A photograph of the area set for rehabilitation has been provided to you in your Agenda Package. The estimated cost for doing this rehabilitation work is $15,000. Mr. Domenie asked, "Does that estimate include the removal of the remaining cattails"? Does hand removal mean digging them and pulling them out by the root? Mr. Ward replied, "Yes". Mr. Bawduniak stated, "We need to be positive that we are winning the war against the cattails before we do this replanting". Mr. Ward replied, "The consultants believe that they are winning in that location and I will wait until after the fact to be the judge of that". It is still bad in that particular location, but the consultants do believe they are gaining control of the cattails in that area. Mr. Wemer stated, "The impression given to the Sub-committee was that the consultants were not hesitant in planting that area because there are only a few cattails remaining and those remaining cattails would be removed by hand". Mr. Domenie asked, "Are the plants being used for the replanting going to be saltwater tolerant? What are we going to be planting in that area? Mr. Ward replied, "All of the materials that Turrell & Associates have recommended to you are salt tolerant materials and will work in a brackish water system and fresh water as well". Mr. Vlasho asked, "Were those plants shown to us at a previous meeting"? 4949 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J 1 Mr. Ward replied, "Yes, all of these materials were shown to you previously". The plants being used are very small and will take some time to grow, but the cost of going from a bare root material to larger material is prohibitively expensive. Mr. Carroll stated, "A year to two ago when we started working that area, we sent people out to get rid of the cattails and they sunk in the muck and quit and we had to get someone else to finish the job". How difficult of a job is it to do this work by hand? Mr. Ward replied, "This is extremely difficult". The workers will essentially sink up to chest level due to the thickness of the biomass that exists in that area. Mr. Domenie asked, "There was discussion as to whether we would use three or five gallon plants and what was decided"? Does the $15,000 cover the removal of the cattails, plus the plant material? Mr. Ward replied, "The material is essentially bare root stock and included in the estimate". It is not the larger material. Mr. Domenie asked, 'M/ill the new plant materials be overtaken by the existing material"? Mr. Ward replied, "The intent of the hand removal of the balance of the cattail materials and planting these materials in bare root form was that they will grow quick enough to overtake the cattails. Time will tell whether or not that works. Mr. Carroll asked, "1 have never seen nor heard of some of these plant materials, but have any of these plants been planted within Pelican Bay that we could take a look at"? Mr. Ward replied, "Actually, every one of the plants have been used in Pelican Bay somewhere". Cordgrass is a tall slender-leafed grass and is used along the boulevards in Pelican Bay. Leather Fern is used a lot in wet areas and is a thick, broad-leafed plant material. I have seen Leather Fern used frequently in the ©akmont area. Pickerelweed, Needle Rush and Duck Potato are typically seen planted around lakes and can be seen growing in Systems II and I behind the St. Tropez condominium. Mr. Roellig moved, seconded by Mr. Werner and approved unanimously to authorize the replanting of the north cattail area at an estimated cost of $15,000. 4950 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 l_6J 1_ Mr. Roellig continued, "At the Sub-committee Meeting there was also a proposal presented for pumping seawater into the area in front of the Coronado. The pumping work started about one week ago and so far everything has gone well. Mr. Ward explained, '1 looked at the operation and I believe it is working, but I just can't tell the affect at this point in time". By next month we should have a better handle on it. Mr. Roeilig stated, "The Sub-committee felt this was a rather Iow cost initiative and felt that we should try this pumping without any advance studies". There was no indication of any negatives associated with putting seawater into that area to control the cattails. Spraying the cattails is very expensive and is not something we want to continue indefinitely. This is just another method to try to eliminate the cattails. Mr. Domenie stated, "1 feel that some of the expert opinions we have received are not working out and it has me greatly concerned". We have been told, and I have gone back through the minutes, that once we dug the channels that saltwater would come into that area. I have asked at every meeting for saltwater readings at the berm and along the berm and have been told that it is easy to do and we have the equipment, yet I have never been provided with this information. I have not seen any saltwater flowing into the area, but I have seen water flowing out no matter what time of the day it is or what the tide is. We have also been told that when summertime comes you will see the saltwater flowing into the area. We are forty-six days into the summer, we have had high tides, we have had westerly winds and full moons, but I have not heard anybody tell me what the salt content is. Now, in desperation and due to failure, we are starting to pump saltwater into the area. I was also under the impression we were only going to pump for two weeks and now I hear it is going to be a month. Mr. Ward replied, "What you talked about at your Sub-committee Meeting is that we would pump for a week or two". The pumping has just started and I believe it will go a full two weeks. I have not heard that the pumping was going to be extended beyond that and I will be able to report the results of that project to you at your next meeting. 4951 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J Mr. Domenie stated, 'M/e should start pumping at the north end and work our way south". We are planting the north end and half way down we are going to start pumping saltwater into that area, but in between we are leaving things the way they are. I feel that was the failure of our specialists who did not do the correct study and our having to pump in saltwater tells me that their planning was a complete failure. I was also under the impression that they were going to measure the salinity of the water we were going to be pumping. As far as I know, we are pumping fresh water into the area instead of salt water. Mr. Ward replied, "As far as the salinity readings along the berm, our readings indicate to us that it is pretty much fresh water". Mr. Domenie asked, "You mention your readings and if you have any readings at all, we have not received them". Mr. Ward replied, "1 don't know if Mr. Lukasz records them on a piece of paper, but we do random sampling and he has a meter with which to do those samplings". I will ask him if he records that information. I do know that readings were done in the pump location area to determine what that salinity was. Mr. Lukasz had reported that the salinity was high enough to work in the cattail area and I will be glad to get that specific number for you. Mr. Domenie stated, '1 would be interested in that number because if we are pumping water that is less than 7 ppm, then we are not improving the situation at all and just pumping water back and forth". Mr. Ward replied, "1 will tell you that it was above the 7 ppm, but I don't remember the specific number that Mr. Lukasz had reported". We did talk about that at the Sub-committee Meeting and you wanted us to make sure that is was of a sufficient salinity to ensure that it worked. We did do that and there is sufficient salinity in that water to help ensure that this project does work. I know that has been checked and I will get you the readings later this week. Mr. Bawduniak stated, "If we were to have a favorable storm event and tides that would drive saltwater into our east/west cuts, that would be a godsend". Again, when you have that 4952 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J 1 kind of weather you usually have a lot of rainfall, so the freshwater would flush it right out. Is it reasonable to suspect that there is no sense in being optimistic that a storm would help us out? Mr. Ward replied, "The storm that we had a couple of years ago killed the cattails that were in the area". It does not take a lot of salinity and retention time to kill a cattail. The cattails will die just by having contact with saltwater. If you have a storm event that will get saltwater into that area, it will kill those cattails immediately. The tidal flows come in a lot stronger than the freshwater inputs into the system and that is the reason that happens. Mr. Werner stated, "Mr. Domenie and I must be attending different meetings together". I never recall anyone stating emphatically that this saltwater intrusion would happen and if you have the Minutes that state that, please tell Mrs. Smith because I would like to have them to review. Mr. Vlasho may have been the person who suggested pumping saltwater into the area a few months ago and it is an inexpensive way to try to control the cattails. The spraying has been very expensive and this could be an inexpensive and more effective way of getting rid of the cattails since we have tried nearly everything else. I don't know what the problem is with this pumping it is an experiment. Mr. Ward explained, "It is an experiment". The last conversation I had with Turrell & Associates they told us that since the elevations of the biomass are very high in that area and is so thick that it is very hard to get water back there. I believe this is an opportunity to try something different. It doesn't cost any more than spraying the cattails and it doesn't hurt to try it for another week or two. Mr. Vlasho asked, "Where have the lines from the pump been placed"? Mr. Ward replied, "North of the Sandpiper parking lot and south of the Sandpiper Boardwalk". Mr. Roellig stated, "That area was selected to see what the affect would be because it is so isolated". Mr. Vlasho stated, "My observation would be that that is the right area". Mr. Brown asked, "Do we spend approximately $80,000 on water quality testing each year"? 4953 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J 1 Mr. Ward replied, "We spend approximately $25,000 a year on water quality testing". Several years ago it was much higher, but we are in a maintenance mode right now. Mr. Brown stated, "1 would think that the logical thing for the Pelican Bay Services Division to do would be to test for salinity before we started pumping". It should be measured every week and we should be provided a report every week as to the salinity levels. Also, with regard to the plant materials, I don't think anyone on the Board knows what the materials look like. Mr. Vlasho replied, "Those plant materials were presented to us about two meetings ago". Mr. Brown asked, "Since people have complained about what the area looks like, would it be good PR for a feature board to be made that could be set up in this building and at the Commons to show the kinds of plant materials that will be planted in that area"? I feel it would be good for the people in Pelican Bay to see what they are getting for their money. I think it would be nice for the 7,000 people who are paying for the replanting to see what it will look like. Mr. Vlasho stated, "That sounds like a good idea and let's see if Mr. Carroll can incorporate that schematic into his next article for the Pelican Bay Post". Mr. Carroll replied, "1 have already done that". It was very small, but what Mr. Brown is talking about are larger pictures and posting them. Mr. Brown stated, "Let's take a proactive course and say, "We are spending your money and this is what we might get". Mr. Vlasho stated, "Mr. Domenie summarized a number of things and the specifics I don't quarrel with, but with our taking advice and it not working is easy to blame on the experts". I believe the consultants have given us their best advice at the time and it just hasn't worked. We are now ten weeks from a solution, because I believe our position has been to wait until the rainy season is over and see where we are. It is encouraging that we are able to replant one of the areas and hopefully there will be spaces where replanting can continue in some of the other areas. Unfortunately, the worst area that the residents see ail the time is behind the two condominiums. It is just unfortunate, but I don't think we get a lot from "who shot who". We took 4954 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J 1 the best advice we could; we spent the funds to get the cattails cut and never expected that we would have to spray them more than once. We dug the channels to get the water to flow in and unfortunately, the water always flows out, which is something nobody ever expected, so now we are trying the pumps. The important thing is that very shortly we are going to be faced with here is where we are and what do we do now? That is what we ought to be focusing on. Let's not forget that the time that we bought is almost over and then the people who we have asked to be patient will say, "Now what are you going to do"? Mr. Roellig stated, '"We have asked the consultants to put together a report which integrates all of the proposals that were made as far as the various studies and how they would interrelate with what is dependent upon what". Hopefully we will have a draft of that report by our next Sub-committee Meeting. We have done what the experts have told us to do and some things have worked better than others, but unfortunately whether we like it or not, there is a large element of trial and error in this endeavor. We have had some success and hopefully we will have more successes than failures. We can go out and survey the area to see how the flows would be, but to survey the 500 acres would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. DUNE RESTORATION Mr. Roellig reported that the paper work for the Dune Restoration Permit has been submitted. There were some comments received back from the State, which have been addressed. We are looking at another month or two before we will receive the permit, providing the State doesn't come back with further requirements. Mr. Ward stated, "The beach surveys have been completed and are presently being compiled". The next step is to go back to the Sub-committee with the proposed locations for the Dune Restoration Project. Once the Sub-committee and Board have selected and approved the locations for the dune restoration work we can go out to bid and work should begin toward the end of this calendar year. Mr. Domenie asked, "Once the permit is received, is it a one time deal or is the permit good for five to ten years"? Mr. Ward replied, "These are Dune Restoration Permits and they are a one time event". 4955 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J 1 MANAGER'S SELECTION COMMITTEE CONTRACT MANAGER SERVICES Mr. Carroll reported that the final RFP for the Contract Manager Services has been provided to all members of the Board. The Sub-committee spent time at their meeting working the Scope of Services in detail. Ms. Ward from the Purchasing Department has published the RFP that was sent out on July 26, 2002 and is very specific that it has to be on the street for twenty-one days, which would require submittal by August 15. At that time the Sub-committee will then have two meetings, one of which will be an Organizational Meeting in which the Sub- committee is provided the proposals. Individually, using the criteria contained in the RFP, the members of the Sub-committee will rank the firms and at the following meeting we would take a vote and move forward from there. Mr. Carroll explained that he has been designated the contact person for any questions about the job and Ms. Ward will get the detailed questions about copies, etc. I have received approximately seven calls, none of which have been from anybody that has been the least bit interested in applying. The calls have been from landscape and building contractors. I have not had what I consider a substantive question about the job. I will schedule a meeting for the Sub- committee after the RFP's have been opened, to review the proposals that we have and hopefully get this resolved by the end of the month. Mr. Werner asked, "Does the Sub-committee make the final recommendation or does it come back before this Board"? Mr. Carroll replied, '1 would think that the final recommendation would come back before this Board". Mr. Vlasho stated, "After reading your Minutes, what does it say about your work when six or seven people call and they don't know what the job was"? Mr. Carroll replied, "Most of the people who called did not actually have the RFP". They subscribe for $25.00 a year to get a post card telling them that there is an RFP available. Most of these people have not seen the RFP and have no idea what it is about. I asked Ms. Ward why 4956 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J 1 we had to have this post card business and apparently it is a procedure of the Purchasing Department. Mr. Harrell stated, "If I am not mistaken, Ms. Ward told us that there were twenty-six or twenty-eight firms in Florida that were registered to do this kind of work and all of them would receive this notice". It is very possible that somebody knows what they are doing and doesn't have questions. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS GULF PARK DRVE TO PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD (NORTH ENTRANCE) IRRIGATION & LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Mr. Ward reported that the irrigation and landscaping project is going relatively well and on schedule and I don't anticipate any major problems with respect to that project at this point in time. COMMUNITY ISSUES U.S. 41 MEDIAN LANDSCAPING Mr. Ward reported that the County Commission has a number of median landscaping projects before them and they are considering a way in which to not only fund the capital improvements, but more importantly the ongoing operation and maintenance elements of these median improvement programs. At the July 30th Board of County Commissioners Meeting they decided to have a Workshop in September on the issue County-wide and to come up with a policy on how they are going to fund the two aspects of these programs. One aspect is the capital element and secondarily, the operating and maintenance element. They have to determine whether or not they will be able to do either one of those in the tight budgetary times in which they are currently operating. Mr. Ward continued, "We need to wait until the September 23 meeting of the Board of County Commissioners to see what happens as a result of the policy". I am not aware that staff is working feverishly to come up with a recommended policy. I believe staff is waiting to see what the County Commission decides to do with respect to this issue. Mr. Vlasho asked, "Isn't the FDOT involved with this issue also"? 4957 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J 1 Mr. Ward replied, "For all of the projects where the landscaping is going in on an FDOT road, the FDOT must approve the construction and an operating agreement has to be in place, which allows an entity besides FDOT to maintain it". This is essentially where our bog down is right now. That agreement is required to be signed by the Board of County Commissioners to maintain the Phase II area. Our construction plans are ready to go and FDOT has signed off on them, but will not release the permits until the Board of Commissioners has signed the agreement and we cannot bid the project until the agreement has been signed. Mr. Werner stated, "1 sent a letter to the County Commissioners requesting that they maintain the area". I received a letter back from Commissioner Carter explaining the workshop in September and that he has asked Mr. Feder to get FDOT to approve the plans. Is that the construction plans? Mr. Ward replied, "1 am aware that there is a request to FDOT to approve the plans without the agreement". I am not aware whether the State will or will not do that. Mr. Vlasho stated, "Commissioner Carter has told me that he is trying every which way to get the maintenance done for us, even considering an extension of the maintenance agreement from the south end to the north end". He is confident that something will happen, but I don't know what it is. Mr. Werner stated, "The important thing is to get it out of the hands of the State into the hands of the County where we can work with it". Mr. Vlasho stated, "Once again we are going to be faced with not getting it done before season". Everything is on hold. SIDEWALK OVERLAYS AND REPAIRS Mr. Ward reported that Transportation still plans to do the sidewalk overlays and repairs and it is on their project list to complete before the end of this fiscal year. I still remain relatively optimistic that will occur at this point in time. Mr. Bawduniak stated, "A good job was done in the south part of Pelican Bay with some of the tripping liability". Has that been done in the northern part of Pelican Bay also? Has the 4958 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J 1 entire area of Pelican Bay where the sidewalks have been risky for tripping people, been taken care of? Mr. Ward replied, "The really risky ones have all been done". We are going back and through our funds we are installing some additional bio-barriers. The really bad ones have all been repaired. PELICAN BAY BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Ward reported that the Public Hearing for the Board of County Commissioners to consider the adoption of your budget and the levy of your Non-ad valorem Assessment is scheduled for Monday, September 9, 2002 at 6:00 P.M. in this building. The letters will be going out to the property owners notifying them of their assessment late next week. We will provide an advance copy of that letter to you during the middle to latter part of next week. Mr. Domenie asked, "Who presents the budget to the Commissioners"? Mr. Ward replied, "The way the County Commission works is that it goes through the budget office". I make a presentation to the County Manager with respect to the Budget, if he desires, but he has not requested one in the past few years. The County Commission usually considers the budget on a division-by-division basis. That Public Hearing is really the time that they take your budget under consideration. Mr. Vlasho stated, "In conversation with Commissioner Carter, he has commented that he did not see anything wrong with the Budget". Mr. Roellig stated, "The U.S. 41 median, south of the south entrance of Pelican Bay Boulevard, has a lot of dead plants in it". The County is not really doing a very good job of maintenance in that area. The U.S. 41 median north of the south entrance appears fine. Mr. Werner asked, "Is there any way that Pelican Bay Services can take over the maintenance of the medians and have the County reimburse us for doing the work"? Mr. Ward replied, "Yes, we can do that". We have offered that to them in the past, but the County does not want to do that. Mr. Vlasho stated, "In talking with Commissioner Carter he told me that streetlights on U.S. 41, from Gulf Park south, was in the FDOT plan and that they are going to put up the 4959 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J 1 lighting. The only problem is that FDOT cannot do it for eighteen months. Commissioner Carter has the Collier County Transportation Department looking to see if they can find a contractor to do the work and if FDOT will allow them to move forward with that work. Mr. Werner stated, '~/Ve had the Sheriff attend our last Board Meeting and I questioned why we were paying for the cost for two wrecked vehicles". I met with the Finance Director and basically the cars were ready to be replaced anyway and we would have been charged for their replacement even if they were not wrecked. I indicated that what bothers me is the principle that we are bearing the cost of a vehicle for a deputy coming to and from work, but when the deputy is on a temporary assignment outside of Pelican Bay we are giving the benefit to the County and I don't think that we should be liable. Ms. Kinzel talked it over with the Sheriff and they are agreeable that we would be responsible for damage to the vehicles in their travel to and from Pelican Bay and while they are on duty in Pelican Bay. If damage occurs while on a temporary assignment outside of Pelican Bay, then the Sheriff's Department is going to be responsible for the damage. A letter will be forthcoming from the Sheriff's Department noting that agreement. The bottom line was that would have ended up paying for the cars anyway, even though they were wrecked because they were due for replacement. Mr. Ward replied, "In this instance you actually came out better". The insurance proceeds that we received were far in excess of the depreciated value of "$0". Mr. Domenie stated, "After the Sheriff's presentation I went to the Sheriff's Department on another matter and while there I asked the question which had come up about the bikers". I was told that on Thursday after our meeting an officer went to the bike shop and informed them that there would be no more warnings issued and tickets would be forthcoming. On Monday the Sheriff was out in force and they handed out twelve tickets at the corner of Ridgewood Drive and Bentwood Drive. The citation for going through a stop sign on a bicycle is $86.00, the same as for a car. I believe a couple of residents of Pelican Bay also received the citation. If you ride a bike, please be aware. Mr. Werner asked, "Is Dune Restoration County funding"? Mr. Ward replied, "Yes". 4960 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J FINANCIAL STATEMENT REVIEW Mr. Ward reported that there are barely sixty days remaining in your fiscal year and all of the general funds, whether it is Water Management, Community Beautification, Street Lights or Security will be right in line with what was projected and somewhat under what was projected for the end of the fiscal year which is September 30, 2002. I am confident that we will slightly exceed what those projections were in your budget process. The Capital Funds are the same way. There will be significant Clam Bay funds remaining because of the number of projects that have been delayed during the current year and we will utilize those funds again next year. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Mr. Addison Skaggs - Oakmont resident - A couple of years ago Mr. Swart had a meeting with Ms. Arnold of the County and she indicated that we could attend some of their training programs, which led him to believe that we could borrow their noise recording equipment. A couple of months ago I called to see if we could borrow the equipment and Ms. Arnold indicated we could not. She indicated that she would check with the County Attorney and also that they have used a consultant from Cape Coral in the past and she would provide us the name of the consultant. Time went by and I have never heard back from her. Ms. Arnold sent a letter on December 8, 2000 to Mr. Ward and I called her office to see if the octave band reading, which was to have been done in January 2001, has ever been completed and she would not return my call. I have also talked with her Secretary who indicated that she would relay the message, but I never did hear back. In one of our meetings with Commissioner Carter he indicated he would also find out the information, but I have not heard anything from his office either. My question is, "Mr. Ward, have you ever received any information with regard to whether or not that octave band reading was ever done and if so, did you get the results"? My theory is that the work was never done. Mr. Ward replied, "1 will be glad to check into it for you". Mr. Bawduniak asked, "Have you ever gotten a copy of the material that was given to Mr. laizzo of the Pelican Bay Property Owners' Association regarding the study that was done with a 4961 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 16J I decibel meter along U.S. 41 over different periods, to record peak events according to the protocol of FDOT? Mr. Skaggs replied, "No". Mr. Bawduniak stated that the study was done according to the protocols of FDOT, which were given to the person taking the noise measurements, along with Carbon Monoxide measurements, along the berm. I would suggest you talk with Mr. Laughlin and Mr. laizzo to get a copy of that report. COMMITTEE REQUESTS Mr. Bawduniak stated, "Mr. Carroll does a very good job of summarizing our activities for the Pelican Post". For a lot of reasons I think the Post is one of the greatest vehicles for communicating in this Community. In an article written by Libby Bramson I see that we do things without communicating with the public. I take that comment as a challenge and not just as a criticism. It bothers me when I am asked to comment on what the MSTBU is about and I talk a few minutes about the budget and then somebody will ask me about the restaurants and I will have to stop and hold my temper and ask how many years have you been here? I don't know of what other vehicle we have to bring the citizens into it, but maybe we need a truck with speakers on it that we park at different corners and announce that this is what the MSTBU is up to. Maybe we should do some futuristic writing about what we are considering. This has been done in the past and I don't know how much more we can do, but I don't think we can solve this overnight. Maybe there is something else we can do to make sure that the citizens are plugged in before the fact, instead of finding out what we have done. Mr. Vlasho stated, "1 have told the Foundation that the Pelican's Post is a tremendous tool, but over the last couple of issues it has become a competition with the Editorial Page of the Naples Daily News". In my opinion there is a lot of perception that is recorded as fact and we get accused of not adhering, not listening and making misinformed decisions, which I don't think is true. Mr. Harrell stated, "1 took that article as criticism also, but it is unfortunate like any form of government, that the few people that are in the audience participating are actually lobbying". It is 4962 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD August 7, 2002 1_6J tough to take the criticism that we are not doing what we had all decided to do and get nothing for it. Mr. Werner stated, "1 actually found the article educational". I am not sure many of you realize that water does not flow up hill. I think we mentioned many times that water can be forced up hill by tidal action, but we ail agree that it doesn't flow up hill. Mr. Vlasho stated, "1 want the record to show that we did distribute the letter from Mr. Laughlin of the Pelican Bay Property Owners regarding the noise amendment and dealing with U.S. 41 again and that we are not planning any action". We also had a letter distributed today from Mrs. Cook regarding bike lanes in Pelican Bay. Mr. Don Levenson - resident - I am not sure you know that the Foundation has an ad hoc sub-committee on communications. Mr. Jim Johnson chairs the ad hoc committee and we want to get definition from the Foundation Board of Directors as to the actual purpose of this committee. I will tell you that what you just talked about has to come up at this ad hoc committee. ADJOUNED There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:10 P.M. Mr. Lou Vlasho, Chairman 4963 i6J 1 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Pelican Bay Adviso.ry B,~. rd ,,~,,~ { David Roellig, "Member (~ August 26, 2002 Subject: Pelican Bay Preliminary Coordination Meeting In response to a request from lan McKeag, Foundation Board Vice Chairman, I met informally with lan McKeag and Dick Laughlin, President, PBPOA on August 23, 2002. We discussed items of common interest, such as: cattail area, dune restoration and the Foundation's current study of the vulnerability of its beachfront facilities. Attached for your information is a copy of an August 22, 2002 memo to the Foundation Board from Mr. McKeag. I provided a status report on the planned re-vegetation of the north cattail area and our dune restoration efforts including activities proposed in our 03 Budget. Obviously, due to the Sunshine requirements, only an individual PBAB member can meet for coordination efforts, unless meetings are held as part of our regular meetings. 6. At this time, no additional meetings are scheduled. Attachment: McKeag memo cc: James Ward lan McKeag Dick Laughlin 16J To: Board of Directors From:. lan McKeag Re: Common Interests Date: August 22, 2002 The Pelican Bay Foundation has substantial financial, economic and environmental interests in (a) the canals bordering the berms, (b) the body of water named "Pelican Bay" and (c) the beaches adjacent to our gulf-fi'ont facilities. In additiom the Foundation has a legal interest in the adjacent beaches extending west to the point of median high tide. Of course, the Pelican Bay Services Division has direct jurisdiction over each of these "community assets" and is involved in remedial programs for each of them to varying degrees. Historically, the Foundation has monitored the PBSD's programs and initiatives relevant to all community assets and provided informal comments and suggestions. In the past, both our President and Chairman have undertaken responsibility for maintaining an ongoing dialogue with their respective counterparts at the PBSD. In addition, our President fi'equently attends PBSD advisory board meetings. In consideration of the importance ofotu' community assets to the general well being of Pelican Bay, I am recommending that, fi.om time to time, we supplement and expand our normal channels of communications with respect to specifically targeted assets of the community. At this time, the (a) canals, (b) bay and (c) beaches seem to warrant special attention to ensure that the Foundation is fully supporting and assisting the PBSD in the restoration and improvement of these critical community assets. Of course, the beaches and our gulf-fi.ont dining and leisure facilities are the centerpieces of our community; and the canals and bay are part of any excursion to or from the beaches. For these reasons, Gerhard Seblatnigg and I have frequently discussed the importance of these community assets over the course of planning for the replacement, enhancement or insurance of various Foundation assets. Gerhard and I ask for your support as we expand our communications with committee chairmen and others of the PBSD. Of course, we will coordinate our efforts with those of our President and Chairman, who fully endorse our extension of the ongoing dialogue between the organizations. We also invite the PBPOA and any other interested associations or persons to also participate. Please provide Gerhard and myself with your insights on these important matters. MINUTES PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER'S SELECTION COMMITTEE August 20, 2002 Naples, Florida 16J LET IT BE KNOWN, that the Manager's Selection Committee of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met on this date, August 20, 2002 at 3:30 P.M. at Hammock Oak Center, 8962 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present: Mr. James Carroll (Chairman) Mr. Joseph Bawduniak Mr. John Domenie Mr. Glen Harrell (Absent) Mr. Chris Sutphin Ms. Kelsey Ward (Non-voting member) ALSO PRESENT: One (1) Pelican Bay resident and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Ranking of RFP's for Contract Manager Services 3. Audience Participation 4. Committee Requests 5. Adjourn ROLL CALL Mr. Carroll called the meeting to order and asked that the record show Mr. Glen Harrell with an excused absence. RANKING OF RFP'S FOR CONTRACT MANAGER SERVICES Ms. Ward explained, "This is a Selection Committee Meeting for RFP #02-3411, Management Services for Pelican Bay Services Division, with four of the five Committee members in attendance". Notices for Proposals were sent to one hundred three (103) vendors, for which we had twelve (12) vendors who requested a copy of the full RFP. Of the twelve (12) vendors that received the RFP, one (1) firm responded. I have reviewed the one proposal that we have received and it does meet the minimal compliance requirements. The Selection Committee Members have been provided a scoring sheet and a copy of the original Request for Proposal document. The scoring sheet is made up of grading criteria that corresponds exactly to what was requested in our solicitation, which is on Page 10 of the RPF. You are going to be grading the proposal that you received and even though we only received one response, we have 27 s^Y s v'c s COT'g August 20, 2002 to follow the same procedure in grading their proposal. In Item Number One (1), we asked for Qualifications of Experience of Staff and provided an explanation of what we were looking for, so that when you are reading the proposal you are grading them according to how well they responded. The minimum points you can allow is "0", which would mean they did nothing whatsoever in their response and the highest number of points allowed is 35. Typically, most people start in the middle with 17 and if they were below average you would give them less points, but if they were above average you would give them an amount corresponding to that higher average. Each Committee member will grade the proposal separately. The Purchasing Department requires individual scoring sheets, but you can talk amongst yourselves, you can ask questions and you can bring things to another's attention. Ultimately it is a consensus decision and is not strictly based on point values. The decision will be made by looking at the number of points assigned for each proposer in each category and then asking, do we or do we not want to go with this person? Mr. Carroll asked, "On the first item, "Qualifications and Experience of Staff", can we as members of the Committee discuss that amongst ourselves? Ms. Ward replied, "Yes". You can discuss any aspect of the proposal. I have to have individual scoring and I don't Want to get four scoring sheets that all have identical scoring. You do your own perspective on how you individually score the proposal, but you can talk amongst yourselves to arrive at those individual scores. Mr. Domenie asked, "Can that be outside of the official meeting"? Ms. Ward replied, "No, we are doing this right now". Mr. Domenie stated, "Earlier we were told that we would take the proposals home and rank the proposers". Ms. Ward replied, "Originally we were going to do that because we did not know how many proposals would be returned". If we had received ten proposals, you would not have been able to sit in this meeting and read all ten and then score them. Since we received one proposal it made sense to combine everything into one meeting. 28 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER'S SELECTION COI~I~E~.~ 1! August 20, 2002 , Mr. Carroll stated, "That is what Ms. Ward and I decided to do". Right now we should look at this proposal with the idea of scoring the proposer". Mr. Domenie asked, "Ms. Ward, can you give us an opinion as to why we received only one response out of the twelve inquiries"? Ms. Ward replied, "Actually, I am surprised there was only one response after having twelve inquiries for the entire package and after their inquiring as to what the RFP was all about". Mr. Carroll had some calls from construction management services, but he explained to them that construction was not the scope of work and none of those inquiries requested a package. Out of the people who called us, requested the package and to whom we provided an overview, I was really surprised that we only received one proposal back. I have been doing this for quite a while and you just never know what you are going to get. Mr. Domenie asked, "Were these firms all located in Florida"? Ms. Ward replied, "Most of them were in Florida". A lot of them were national firms where we sent notices to their headquarters and they have had experience in this type of business. I think a lot of the reasoning is that we are far down in the State, with the next stop being the Everglades. How many firms are going to want to put in the time and effort on this type of project if they are located in Jacksonville, farther north in the State or out of state? It is not worthwhile for them to do that. Mr. Sutphin asked, "Is the current contract a matter of Public Record"? Ms. Ward replied, "Yes". Mr. Sutphin asked, "What is the annual fee that we are currently paying to Mr. Ward's company? Mr. Bawduniak replied, "Forty-eight thousand dollars ($48,000) and that has remained the same for years". Mr. Carroll stated, "The fee was reduced about four or five years ago". Mr. Sutphin stated, "You may be surprised that there were no responses, but this is a $50,000 a year job". I would not come in here from scratch and bid on this job for twice that figure, it is too complicated a job. 29 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER'S SELECTION COMMITTEE August 20, 2002 .L J .!. Mr. Domenie replied, "They did not know what the value is". Mr. Sutphin replied, "They do know the value because the current contract is a matter of Public Record". Anyone has the ability to know that the incumbent is being paid $48,000 a year to do this job. Ms. Ward explained, "Some companies do the research and want every detail". Mr. Bawduniak stated, "The RFP was reasonably comprehensive and if they read it they would have a good idea". Ms. Ward stated, "1 am surprised that we did not get someone who didn't know what we were looking for with regard to fees and submitted a proposal for $250,000 a year". They could have done that and it is really odd that it didn't happen. Mr. Carroll stated, "1 thought a firm such as WilsonMiller might submit a proposal, but they didn't". Mr. Domenie asked, "Do we reimburse Mr. Ward for his travel expenses or anything like that"? Mrs. Smith replied, "No". Mr. Carroll stated, "On Page 1, Section 2, you will see Mr. Ward's background". Those of us that have been on the Board really know all about him. Mr. Sutphin stated, "What I find interesting is the depth in back of Mr. Ward when you go through the other members of his firm". Mr. Carroll stated, "In my experience we have never seen anybody else". Mr. Domenie stated, "1 was wondering who Mr. Kissinger, the Regional Manager, is"? Mr. Carroll stated, "If you ask Mr. Ward this question, his reply is that he has all of these people on staff who are able to step in and help". The one worry we have had is that there is always the possibility that Mr. Ward could become ill and not be able to do the job, then what"? When I ask that question, Mr. Ward seems to assure us that there is someone else in his organization that could perform this job. Mr. Sutphin stated, "That is something that we tend to overlook because we see Mr. Ward all of the time". We are not hiring Mr. Ward we are hiring a company. 30 AugostPELIGAN BAY SERVIC£S DIVISION MANAGER'S SELECTION C¢~TT~E20, 2002 Mr. Carroll replied, "We don't identify with a company, we identify with Mr. Ward, but you are right". Mr. Domenie asked, "What is Mr. Kissinger's relationship with us"? Mr. Sutphin replied, "The point is, if Mr. Ward had a heart attack and was unable to perform his duties, there are qualified people in the company who could come over and do what Mr. Ward does". Mr. Domenie stated, "1 am trying to figure out what the corporate structure is". Mr. Carroll stated, "Mr. Ward is the Vice President of Operations". Mr. Tom Brown stated, "We have Ms. Jean Smith, who is a full time employee on the purchasing side". If you have any questions of where the money goes, she knows. Mrs. Barbara Smith is a full time employee and Mr. Lukasz runs all of the crews and this is basically a maintenance job. If Mr. Ward got sick and missed six months of work, I don't think it would make that much of an impact on the day-to-day operations. Mr. Carroll stated, "1 agree". Mr. Tom Brown asked, "Ms. Ward, do you have the names of half a dozen of the firms who could have bid on this proposal"? Ms. Ward replied, "We have 103 names". Mr. Tom Brown asked, "Who else is doing facilities management like this within the State"? I don't mean construction management or computer facilities management, because that is a specialized area. What other companies deal with just administrative financial management? Ms. Ward replied, "We don't break them down into that specific of a category". We are sending to a company name, which they have asked for in certain categories, but we don't go into the level of detail as to every little specific group or type of business that they provide. Mr. Carroll stated, "1 don't know as we would really want to pursue that". Mr. Tom Brown replied, "The reason I ask is that it bothers me and I would assume that it would bother each of you, that nobody else came in and said that they were interested". Mr. Carroll replied, "The last time, which was two years ago, Mr. Dorrill submitted a proposal". 31 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER'S SELECTION COMMITTEE August 20, 2002 I ~. I Mr. Brown replied, "That was a special situation where the Pelican Bay Property Owners were trying to make an imprint". Mr. Bawduniak stated, "1 have to suspect that when the Board gives Mr. Ward an assignment that resides in his bailiwick, he doesn't usually do it or doesn't do it all of the time, he goes to staff". They are repeatedly servicing his needs for the Services Division, which inherently should give them the familiarity with Pelican Bay in general with some of the things that happen here. It is very easy to say that when Mr. Ward gets an assignment and a week or month later it is done it is easy to assume that he does it, but I have a hunch that a lot of the time it isn't being done by him personally. Mr. Ward takes the assignment and distributes it to the staff that supports him. Mr. Carroll asked, "Mrs. Smith can you comment on that"? Mrs. Smith replied, "That is very much so". Ms. Jean Smith has been with Mr. Ward for approximately twenty years, I have been with him for about fifteen years and prior to that I was employed by Westinghouse from the inception of Pelican Bay in 1976. Mr. Carroll asked, "Does Mr. Ward call on some of his staff people back in Coral Springs"? Mrs. Smith replied, "Periodically, but I don't believe it happens very often". Mr. Domenie stated, "The budgets are not set up in your office are they"? Mrs. Smith replied, "Yes, they are". Ms. Jean Smith and Mr. Lukasz prepare the budget, with Mr. Ward's input. Mr. Domenie asked, "Where is the head office of Severn Trent"? Mrs. Smith replied, "Coral Springs, Florida". Mr. Domenie asked, "Does this answer Qualifications and Experience of Staff"? Mr. Carroll replied, "It appears to me that it does". I can't think of any more qualifications and experience that I would want. I am inclined to put 35 points down for him in this category because I don't know of any deficiency that I have observed. Do I have to write something down now? 32 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER'S SELECTION COMI~ 1 August 20, 2002 Ms. Ward replied, "1 will collect the scope sheets at the end of the meeting, but you can put them in pencil or jot down temporary numbers for now". Mr. Carroll stated, "The next category is Previous Experience of the Firm on Similar Contracts". Mr. Domenie stated, "It reads, "The staff at Pelican Bay is a highly efficient and capable team with whom we have had the honor to work with for many years." Mr. Carroll stated, "The biggest mystery to me when we talk experience is this whole budget preparation process that goes on". Mr. Ward arrives here and plunks this big book in front of us and you wonder where all of it came from. Mrs. Smith just said that Mr. Lukasz and Mrs. Jean Smith had a lot to do with that, but when you quiz Mr. Ward on it he seems to know what is going on all the way down the line. Mrs. Smith explained, "Mr. Ward outlines the programs and levels of service that the Board has decided that they would like to perform in the future and the budget is basically derived from that point". Mr. Bawduniak stated, "The budget is basically an ibid each year, except for those elements of projects or capital concerns that Mr. Ward brings in on the planning aspect, whereas Mr. Lukasz and Ms. Smith say here is what we did last year and project those figures for this year. Mr. Ward's part is more futuristic. Mr. Carroll stated, "This says previous experience of the firm on similar contracts and we don't know what the experience has been on other contracts". Mr. Domenie stated, "We don't know how satisfied the other people are". Mr. Carroll stated, "1 don't think that is pertinent with the long experience that we have had with Mr. Ward and his staff". Mr. Bawduniak stated, "All we have are his previous contracts with us". Mr. Tom Brown stated, "The budget is brought in for this year and it is a thick document". Who is going to go through it? The answer is nobody. Would it be logical that in the future we request that time be set aside at every meeting to discuss a part of the budget for the previous year, so that each part of the budget is reviewed by members of the Board in detail? When you get a thick book like the budget you tend to take it and that's it. Mr. Carroll replied, "It is overwhelming, I agree". That is more of an operational procedure. Mr. Domenie stated, "The problem in a review like that is that you have the principle and then you have to go through the sub-accounts". For instance, Mrs. Smith's salary and benefits are spread out over perhaps five sections within the budget. Mr. Brown replied, "1 understand that". If a little were done on the budget at every meeting, would that be beneficial in the Board trying to keep a handle on the millions of dollars that are being spent? Mr. Carroll replied, "You might want to bring that up at a meeting". I am not sure we want to dwell any more on this particular item. It is my concept that we are not just talking about Mr. Ward, but the entire staff and those in Coral Springs that might be helping out. All we can do is judge on experience. Mr. Domenie stated, "It says "previous experience of the firm on similar contracts", not on our contract". It is difficult for us to judge this. Ms. Ward replied, "You have to remember that this RFP was not written for Severn Trent and someone you know". This RFP was written for people who would have no knowledge of Pelican Bay Services and we ask them how do we know, you prove it to us, that you have this experience. Mr. Domenie replied, "1 know, I can only judge Mr. Ward's performance here and I can see all of these District projects, but I don't know if the people are satisfied with him". I am not going to grade very high on this item, not because I don't believe they are capable, but because I don't know any similar contracts they are working on. Ms. Ward replied, "There is no logic as to how we receive a proposal". Sometimes the proposal is received in the order that we ask for and other times they are not. In Section 6 there is a Proposers Qualification Form. This is what was in the original RFP and we ask the proposer to list all of their current contracts that are similar to this particular RFP. The fact that they listed 34 these contracts means that if we wanted to check with each of the entities and ask if they are happy with the firm, we could do that. Mr. Bawduniak stated, "1 believe that I have heard Mr. Ward reference that the City of Weston has been one of their clients for several years and it is noteworthy that it is over a $3,000,000 a year client". If they are getting repeats for $3,000,000 a year, they must be doing something right. Mr. Carroll stated, "1 have a little trouble using Mr. Domenie's reasoning to say that I am going to grade it lower because I don't know that". Mr. Bawduniak stated, "What he is saying is that because he does not know, he is going to give them a lower grade and I am not sure that is in balance". Mr. Carroll replied, "1 don't either, particularly if you would take the time to study all of these contracts you would probably come out saying they have a whole lot of experience". Mr. Domenie replied, "It says previous experience of the firm on similar contracts". I presume they have experience, but we don't know how satisfied those clients are. Ms. Ward stated, "It all comes out in the wash, that is why each person grades individually". Mr. Carroll continued, "The next item is, Approach and Understanding of the Contract and how welt did they understand what we are asking for"? I don't think we need to dwell on that very much. Mr. Ward understands the contract better than we do. Mr. Carroll stated, "The Cost Proposal on Page 5 is for a fixed annual amount of $48,000 and is all-inclusive". Mr. Ward is committing himself to $48,000 a year for the next three years. Mr. Bawduniak stated, "This firm is operating in a straight line for a projected history of seven years and the services have not gone downhill, so we should be very pleased that he is willing to maintain that level". Mr. Carroll stated, "1 believe the service is better now". I have a little experience over other members of this Committee, but it appears to me that compared to the first year or two when I was here, there was a fair amount of conflict where Mr. Ward did not provide or did not understand what I had asked for". I don't hear that any more. 35 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER'S SELECTION COMMITTEE August 20, 2002 Mr. Sutphin asked, "Is that a performance or chemistry issue"? Mr. Carroll replied, "There was a lot of chemistry in that". Mr. Bawduniak stated, "The first year I was on this Board there was a move, interrogation and criticism of Mr. Ward". During one of the first meetings I sat here not knowing a lot and I listened. At that meeting Mr. Harrell asked to have Mr. Ward address each criticism and Mr. Ward was able to satisfy my mind. I think a lot of it was misunderstanding and chemistry. Mr. Carroll replied, "It was pretty hairy for a while". We had a couple of very bombastic people on the Board back then, which caused a conflict and not necessarily with the Manager. Mr. Sutphin stated, "It is a little late to look at this, but $48,000 to manage a District that has a budget of $2,000,000 and with the resident expertise in Mr. Ward's firm, we could probably do a lot more for the District had we expanded on what we wanted from them as a company". It's too late for that now, but they probably have skills that we are not taking advantage of. Ms. Ward explained, "in this Scope of Services you want them to do management services and this is where the negotiation comes in". If you want them to do more, that can be negotiated into the contract. Mr. Sutphin replied, "1 don't know that we know what we want". In this procurement cycle I think we would need to form a Sub-committee to be looking at the next contract cycle and to what services are available that could benefit the District and perhaps save money in the long run. Mr. Carroll stated, "1 think what you are getting into there is what is the Foundation doing that we could do better"? Mr. Sutphin stated, "It really goes beyond the scope of this contract, but it certainly has me thinking that in going forward the Board should be thinking about management structure and how do we interface with the Foundation, so that there is no duplication of effort and the people best qualified to do the jobs are doing them. Implicit in that is a true "Zero Based" budgeting exercise, not looking at last year's budget and the variance, but starting with a clean sheet of paper and do a "zero based" budget on this District. Do we need all of these positions and are there functions we should have that we don't have? It is way beyond this Scope of Service. 36 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER'S SELECTION COMI~T~ August 20, 2002 Mr. Carroll stated, "When we look forward to what we might be doing, I know we have talked about working more closely with the Foundation, but I am not sure how close to that I want to get right now". Mr. Bawduniak stated," I would be more comfortable if Mr. Ward would have asked for more money". Mr. Domenie stated," I thought he was going to come in at $60,000". Mr. Carroll stated, "Mr. Ward has explained that that is the proper level". I talked to him about this several years ago when he lowered his rate. Mr. Carroll stated, "1 believe I have all of my numbers". Mr. Bawduniak stated, "1 am comfortable with my numbers, but I want to thank the County for the mechanism they used to seed this request so far and wide". The responses are not their doing, philosophically in an ideal situation for our community, more responses would have been nice. On a practical basis, I think the Services Division couldn't do better and we have had an easy time and not consumed a whole lot of Committee meetings to come to the conclusion that we are going to have Mr. Ward and his firm again. Mr. Sutphin replied, "1 agree". Mr. Bawduniak stated, "People can criticize us and say you only had one response and how much brainpower can there be in that"? I will take that criticism and say we have somebody who has done an excellent job and we are lucky he is doing it again and for the same money. Mr. Bawduniak stated, "t ranked Mr. Ward's firm as a 91 because nothing is pedect and I took off a few points here and there". Mr. Sutphin stated, "There was so much agitation a few years ago to make a dramatic change and obviously there were not people waiting in the wings to come in and bid for this job or we would have seen it here". Mr. Carroll stated, "1 am comfortable with my ranking of 97". Mr. Sutphin stated, "My number came in at 98" 37 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER'S SELECTION COMMITTEE August 20, 2002 Ms. Ward stated, "If you have finalized your scores, I would like for you to state for the Record, your name and what your final score was and whether or not you want to recommend an award for this RFP. Mr. Sutphin stated, "My name is Christopher Sutphin and my score is 98. I would recommend that we enter into a contract with Severn Trent for the next three years". Mr. Bawduniak stated, "My name is Joseph Bawduniak and my score is 91'. Philosophically that is a little conservative, but I couldn't be happier that our citizens are going to have Mr. Ward and his firm work with us under another contract". Mr. Carroll stated, "My name is Jim Carroll and my score is 97". I am pleased to have Severn Trent and Mr. Ward become our Manager for the next three years. Mr. Domenie stated, "My name is John Domenie". We have been very satisfied with Mr. Ward and his company with the work he is doing in supervising the people in his office and in the field and I came up with a score of 90. This score was basically derived because of the previous experience of the firm on similar contracts and there is just no way that I can judge that. I know they have over one hundred contracts throughout the State of Florida and obviously they are satisfied, otherwise they would not be repeating their services, but I cannot judge how well he is performing. Ms. Ward asked, "Is it the consensus of the Committee that you would like to recommend Severn Trent as the Proposer to offer them a contract and commence contract negotiations"? Mr. Carroll replied, "We all agree and have each given the firm a ranking of 90 points or higher". ADJOURN There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 4:20 P.M. James Carroll, Chairman 38 Memorandum tGj 1 To: From: Date: Subject: Pelican Bay Services Division Board James C. Carroll August 27, 2002 Manager Selection The Manager Selection Committee met on Tuesday, August 20, 2002 at Hammock Oak Center and selected Severn Trent's Proposal. The ranking sheet of the four members of the Committee, along with a copy of the Proposal has been included for your review. There were four of the five members available at the meeting and Mr. Glen Harrell was out of town. As you can see, we all felt that Mr. Ward was the right person to be the Manager of the Pelican Bay Services Division for the next three years. Part of the procedure once the selection has been made is to negotiate the contract with the successful company. We saw no reason to change anything in the Proposal. The cost of $48,000 per year for the next three years seemed quite fair. After some discussion with Mr. Ward and considering our recent Ordinance, I decided that the full Board should approve the selection of the Manager by the Sub-committee. Because I will be out of town on September 4th, I am asking Mr. Bawduniak to make a motion. Ms. Kelsey Ward is handling the Executive Summary (copy attached) which will bring this before the Board of County Commissioners for approval in late September. Pelican Bay Services 0 0 Z 0 16J Z !-- 0 r~ _ ,,, .~ 16J EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AWARD CONTRACT FOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION PURSUANT TO RFP #02-3411, IN THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF $48,000. 1 OBJECTIVE: To obtain professional management services for the Pelican Bay Services Division. CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The Community of Pelican Bay has been designated a dependent Municipal Services Taxing and Benefit Unit (MSTBU) district within Collier County and oversees the operations of the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD) as per Collier County Ordinance #2002-27. The Community thus receives all County Services directly from Collier County and all special, non-County services and benefits from the PBSD. Pelican Bay property owners (both residential and commercial) tax and assess themselves each year to pay for the special PBSD services and amenities. These PBSD funds are collected by the County but are administered by the Manager of the Pelican Bay Services Division. Inasmuch as all funds administered by the Manager are derived from Pelican Bay property owners, and all services, programs and projects are done to benefit these same property owners, it is desirable to hire a professional Manager to manage these funds and the PBSD activities for the benefit of the Pelican Bay Community. The PBSD Board acts for the Board of County Commissioners in the day-to-day operational direction of the Manager of the PBSD as per Section 13, Items D and E of the Ordinance. 2. RFP #02-3411 was posted on July 26, 2002. One hundred and three (103) inquiries were sent to vendors, twelve (12) full packages were requested, and one (1) proposal was received by the due date of August 16, 2002. The sole proposal was from Severn Trent Services, the firm that currently holds the contract for these services. A Selection Committee meeting was held on August 20, 2002 to review and score the proposal. After discussion by the committee members, by consensus the decision was made to award a contract to the sole proposer, Severn Trent Services. On a maximum 100 point scale, the individual member scores ranged from 90 to 98, which indicated that the firm exceeded the requirements of the RFP and is well qualified to continue to perform the identified tasks. FISCAL IMPACT: The annual dollar amount of this contract is $48,000, and is budgeted in Fund 109 Cost Center 182601, Fund 109 Cost Center 182900 and Fund 778 Cost Center 182700. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact on growth management associated with this item. 16J 1! Page Two Executive Summary RFP 02-3359 RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners award RFP 02-3411 to Severn Trent Services, and authorize the Chairman to sign the County Attorney approved agreement. SUBMITTED BY: Kelsey Ward, Senior Purchasing & Contracts Agent Date: REVIEWED BY: Date: Steve Carnell, Purchasing/General Services Director APPROVED BY: Date: Jo-Anne Leamer, Administrative Services Administrator ST-Moyer O0 ~!~ervice Proposal RFP #02-3411 Management Services for Pelican Bay Services Division ST-Moyer 210 N. University Drive Suite 702 Coral Springs, Florida 33071 Tel. (954) 753-5841 Fax. (954) 345-1292 16J 1 Table of Contents Tab Number Section Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cover Letter Qualifications and Experience Approach Past Performance Cost Proposal Proposer's Qualification Forms Appendix - Additional Information Number of Pages 1 5 4 3 1 7 51 S T- Moye r August14,2002 Mr. Steve Carnell, Purchasing Director Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Building, Bldg "G" 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 Subject: RFP #02-3411 - Management Services for Pelican Bay Services Division Dear Mr. Carnell: We are pleased to submit our proposal for consideration for Management Services for the Pelican Bay Services Division of Collier County. We have enjoyed working with the Pelican Bay Community over the last 22 years and hope to continue that relationship over the term of the proposal contract. Severn Trent Services (ST-Moyer) has tailored the Pelican Bay Management Services to meet the residents' need as the Community has grown and evolved. We believe our proposal reflects that understanding of the past and the objectives of the residents for the future. The following proposal utilizes our firm's unique experience in the field of Contract Services to local general and special purpose governments. ST-Moyer currently provides contract services to over 150 special districts, municipalities and divisions of County Government in the State of Florida, a service we have been providing for over twenty five years. The proposed project team of James P. Ward, C. Samuel Kissinger, Chuck Adams, Brian Lamb, Randolph G. White and Uichal Szymonowicz represent over 90 years of combined experience in Community management and over twenty years experience in specific Pelican Bay issues. ST-Moyer has over fifty administrative associates in South Florida supporting this project team in providing the Pelican Bay Community with Management Services. These assets provide the residents with professional and reliable skill sets of support, administrative and facilitator services to fundamental and special project responsibilities as they may require. This proposal reflects our desire to continue providing services to the Pelican Bay Services Division of Collier County. We look forward to your review and believe we have provided a complete response to the Request for Proposals. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. s~nc~rely, Vice President of Operations ST-Moyer o210 North University Drive, Suite 702 · Coral Springs, FL 33071 · Tel 954 753 5841 Fax 954 345 1292 16J Qualifications and Experience Severn Trent Services is the US arm of Severn Trent PIc., a UK-based, leading, worldwide environmental services group providing water, waste and utility services. The company provides services for both private and public sector clients, with a comprehensive range of operational and management services for water, sewer and related systems. At present, Severn Trent Services has over 600 contracts in 31 states serviced by over 4,500 employees. Through the years, the name of Severn Trent Services has become synonymous with the delivery of highest-quality environmental products and services to utilities, local governments and the industry. Over the years it has earned the respect, confidence and loyalty of its customers by offering products and services that are dependable, economically sound and always environmentally sensitive. ST-Moyer is proud to be a member of the Severn Trent Services group. ST-Moyer became a part of Severn Trent Services in 1998 and was previously known to our clients under the name of Gary L. Moyer, P.A. ST-Moyer is a 25-year old company providing local government services to over 150 clients throughout Florida. Key Personnel Contract Liaison - Proposed Manaqer: James P. Ward, Vice President of Operations Contact Information: 210 North University Drive, Suite 702 Coral Springs, FL 33071 Telephone: (954) 753-5841 Cellular: (954) 658-4900 Facsimile: (954) 345-1292 E-mail: wardj @ glmoyer.com Mr. Ward is a graduate of University of Florida in 1977 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration. Mr. Ward began his career in local government with the firm of Gary L. Moyer, P.A., the precursor of ST-Moyer, in 1980 as an Assistant Superintendent at the Coral Springs Improvement District in Broward County. At the end of calendar year 1980, Mr. Ward became an Assistant Manager at the Pelican Bay Services District, where he assisted in the completion of the District's Water Management system and 1/2 million GPD (gallons-per-day) Wastewater Treatment Plant in 1981. To provide for expanding needs of the growing Community, during the remainder of 1980s, Mr. Ward's services facilitated the extension of the District's services to include street lighting, landscaping and an $8.7 million capital expansion of the Water & Wastewater System. Following the Section 2, Page 1 assumption of the District by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners in 1991, Mr. Ward became the Manager of the Pelican Bay Services Division, a Municipal Services Taxing and Benefit Unit of Collier County and has been working in this capacity until present. Major projects he was a part of included the implementation of the Clam Bay Restoration Plan as well as restoration of the District's street lighting, master irrigation, landscaping, and street and entry signage. In addition to his duties relative services to the Pelican Bay community, Mr. Ward also provides contract management, administration and financial services for many other special and general-purpose governments in Florida. Currently Mr. Ward is personally responsible for 43 local government clients, with 37 Community Development Districts, 1 MSTBU (Pelican Bay) and 5 Municipalities. Worth mentioning is Mr. Ward's involvement in the creation of most of these units of local government, including the City of Weston in 1996. To service such a large and diverse group of clients, Mr. Ward developed and perfected many varied services. These services include preparation of meeting agendas, public records management, identification, assessment and implementation of public policy, contract administration, department and employee oversight and performance evaluation, human resources, government and public liaison, public relations, visioning and strategic planning, special projects, customer service, program presentations, information technologies including website design, hosting and maintenance, database management, revenue collection, capital planning, government fund accounting, general fixed asset accounting, investment advisory services, budgeting, accounts payable/receivable, risk management, purchasing, financial analysis, utility billing, special assessment collection, and field services including recreation, water management and water and wastewater. To assist him in providing such varied services to many of its local government clients, Mr. Ward directly supervises 38 employees specializing in varied fields such as management, administrative support, accounting, public finance, field management, and information technologies. Contract Team: C. Samuel Kissinger, Regional Manager Contact information: 1103 South Collier Blvd., Apt. C105 Marco Island, FI 34145 Telephone: (239) 642-3170 (H) Cellular: (239) 340-6267 Facsimile: (239) 642-9082 Mr. Kissinger holds a Master of Public Administration degree from University of Pittsburgh, PA (1961) and also an Honorary Doctor of Laws degree from College of New Rochelle, NY (1981). Mr. Kissinger's experience with local government began in 1959 when he was initially employed as an administrative intern and was later promoted to Assistant Borough Manager of Pottstown, PA. In 1964, Mr. Kissinger became Township Manager of Whitehall Township, PA, _ Section 2, Page 2 where he served as this community's first municipal manager from 1964 to 1968. While there, he established one of the first Cooperative Purchasing Councils in the country. In 1968, Mr. Kissinger moved to Connecticut and became the Town Manager of Enfield, CT. Between 1968 and 1975, Mr. Kissinger assisted in passage of 14 referendums authorizing more than $63 million for a municipality-owned and operated Industrial Park, an Urban Renewal Program, a Sanitary Sewer Installation Program and a new Waste Water Pollution Plant. Following his move to the State of New York, Mr. Kissinger became the City Manager of New Rochelle, NY. During his tenure from 1975 to 1991, the City received more than 50 awards, which highlighted the effectiveness of his administration. Two of the most significant were the U.S. Conference of Mayors' City Livability Award (1987) and Empire State Report's Most Fiscally Sound Community (1989). From the year 1992 until early 2002, Mr. Kissinger was the Village Manager of the Village of Key Biscayne, FL. As the Village's first Manager, he established the police, fire, public works and recreation departments and implemented Village-wide beautification programs such as beach clean up, neighborhood landscaping, street tree planting, as well as capital programs including stormwater and sewer systems, park development, and a $33 million Civic Center complex. While the Manager of Key Biscayne, in 1999 Mr. Kissinger also implemented the transition of the Village's Finance Department to financial services provided contractually by ST-Moyer. An excellent working relationship was developed between Mr. Kissinger and Mr. Ward, and at present Mr. Kissinger is employed by ST-Moyer as a Regional Manager utilizing his skills in management of a number of our firm's local government clients on the West Coast of Florida. Chuck Adams, Director of Operations Contact Information: 17595 S. Tamiami Trail, Suite 203 Fort Myers, FL 33908 Telephone: (941) 437-7805 Cellular: (941) 707-4917 Facsimile: (941) 437-7804 E-mail: adamsc@glmoyer.com Mr. Adams has worked for ST-Moyer in the area of contract management services for local governments for over 13 years, with the last 8 as the Director of Operations. Mr. Adams began his career with our company in January of 1989 in Pelican Bay Services District, where he worked in the areas of Water Management and Water and Sewer. In mid-1990 he was promoted to Field Manager and continued working for the District in this capacity until the District was transitioned to a Dependent District of Collier County in 1991. Following his departure from Pelican Bay, Mr. Adams began managing contract field operations services for other special-purpose government clients of our firm. Currently, Mr. Section 2, Page 3 16J Adams' primary duties are in the management of field operations for Community Development Districts serviced by our company. As the Director of Operations for the West Coast of Florida, Mr. Adams is a close associate of Mr. Ward and works with him on a daily basis. Mr. Adam's base of operations is in Fort Myers, Lee County, and from there he could be available locally in Pelican Bay providing local presence should his services be required. Currently, Mr. Adams' primary responsibilities include the creation and administration of operating budgets totaling over $20 million annually. These budgets provide a framework for the implementation of a broad range of services that include water and sewer, security, landscaping, parks and recreation, drainage and roadway maintenance. The methods of implementation of these programs vary by community and while in some cases they involve traditional "in-house" staff approach, others are provided through contract services. Specific functions performed by Mr. Adams on a daily basis include creation and tracking of budgets, identification, planning and implementation of capital improvement projects, coordination with other governments and civic and community groups, management of personnel and contractors to insure day-to-day maintenance activities are completed on schedule and to the required level of service, and continuous communication with the public to insure that their expectations and needs are being met. Brian Lamb, Assistant Director of Operations Contact Information: 7759 Ebson Drive North Fort Myers, FL 33917 Telephone: (239) 592-5181 Cellular: (239) 707-7989 Facsimile: (239) 592-9021 E-mail: lambb @ glmoyer.com Mr. Lamb has worked in local government for over 4 years with the last 2 as the Assistant Director of Operations for ST-Moyer. During this time frame, Mr. Lambs' primary duties have been in the field operations of Community Development Districts serviced by the company as an Assistant to Uessrs Ward and Adams. Mr. Lambs' responsibilities, similar to those of Mr. Adams', include the creation and administration of capital and operating budgets as well as the daily administration of the services being funded principally from special assessments and service fees and charges. In doing so, Mr. Lamb is responsible for a broad spectrum of community services including water and sewer, water and stormwater management, security, landscaping, irrigation, parks and recreation, and roadway maintenance. Section 2, Page 4 l_6J Randolph G. White, Director of Financial Services Contact Information: 210 North University Drive, Suite 702 Coral Springs, FL 33071 Telephone: (954) 753-5841 Cellular: (954) 658-2594 Facsimile: (954) 345-1292 E-mail: whiter@glmoyer.com Mr. White holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Florida Atlantic University. Prior to working for ST-Moyer, Mr. White worked until 1992 as an Audit Manager of the Public Services Sector. At present, Mr. White directs a department comprised of 11 professionals responsible for the preparation of monthly financial statements for 29 Special Districts and 5 Municipalities. Services provided include recording of receipts and bank deposits, cash and wire transfers, processing of accounts payable and communication with outside vendors, payroll processing, preparation of annual budgets, and preparation of assessment rolls for inclusion on various county tax billings. Mr. White additionally coordinates with each entity's external auditors and assists in the preparation of each annual audited financial report. For the municipal clients, Mr. White prepares the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and submits it to the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for receipt of their Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. To date, all CAFR submittals have received this prestigious award. Michal Szymonowicz, Financial Analyst Contact Information: 210 North University Drive, Suite 702 Coral Springs, FL 33071 Telephone: (954) 753-5841 Cellular: (954) 240-5078 Facsimile: (954) 345-1292 E-mail: szymonowiczm @ glmoyer.com Mr. Szymonowicz graduated from Florida Atlantic University in 1998 with a Master of Science degree in Financial Economics and in that same year joined ST-Moyer as Financial Analyst responsible primarily for financial analysis, assessment methodologies, rate studies, and local government budgeting. Mr. Szymonowicz is responsible directly to Mr. Ward and is frequently assigned special projects requiring financial and economic analysis. _ Section 2, Page 5 Approach ST-Moyer employs an adaptive program aimed at providing our clients with efficiency of scale, tier administrative, financial and IT services, unequalled professional experience and authoritative application of the Community's policies. The individual requirements of each client Community control the application of all of our firm's services. While maintaining efficiencies of scale through uniform service capabilities, these services are applied on a tiered basis to meet the tailored needs of each Community. As the Community matures, services can be modified to meet the exact needs of the residents with efficiency. Of high benefit to our client Communities is our firm's ability to expand or contract services quickly to match levels of service with Community need. In tailoring our services to the unique requirements of the Pelican Bay Services Division of Collier County, we fully understand the complexity of the issues and opportunities facing the Community and have included in our proposal assets and programs capable of meeting the Management Service needs of the Community. This service program begins with provision of skill sets and program assets capable of providing fundamental Management capabilities. These services consist of the recurring responsibilities of the Pelican Bay Services Division including but not limited to: · Administration · Agenda Preparation · Budget Preparation & Adherence · Peer & Supervisory Reviews · Personnel Management · Public Communication _ Section 3, Page 1 16J Ii Administration - Management responsibilities include the implementation of Board policy through the operation of daily staff operations. The staff at Pelican Bay is a highly efficient and capable team with whom we have had the honor to work with for many years now. Our approach to daily administration is to focus their efforts towards the objectives and policies of the Board and keep them flexible in the application of their duties. Agenda Preparation - The recurring meeting schedule of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board requires formal, reliable and accurate agenda preparation and distribution. The Pelican Bay staff is highly trained and capable of handling the most complex of agendas. Our approach is to prepare with the Chairperson agendas with items presented in a timely, fully informed presentation with appropriate back-up material. The proposed project team will always be represented at the County, Board & Committee meetings to address requests and answer any questions these bodies may present. Budget Preparation & Adherence - Annually, in conformance with County policy, the Pelican Bay Services Division Board considers, modifies, presents and ultimately approves a budget to be presented to Collier County for adoption. The budget process includes actual to budget comparisons, staff projections and requests, revenue projections, Board objectives, capital programs, reserves and public hearings. Once adopted, the budget is a focused path of Division policy, intent and Community requirements. Our approach is to steer operations along the budget path while maintaining the larger view of long-term objectives. As opportunities arise or Community need changes, adaptation of the annual budget and that impact must be understood and reliably projected to the Board for consideration. Our approach of maintaining the larger view provides us with a strong capability of meeting these opportunities or changes. Peer & Supervisory Review - Review of the management service provider by Board members. ST-Moyer operates under the consideration that our clients review our value constantly and _ Section 3, Page 2 16J 1i have the authority and right to evaluate our service efficiency and adjust or eliminate the service to meet the needs of the Community. Our Approach is to conduct our business in such a consistent manner as to present our firms' best efforts at all times. Our project team stands on their abilities and welcomes the opportunity to improve through peer and supervisory review. Personnel Management - Planning and implementing the appropriate staffing levels for the Division in meeting the Communities needs. Our approach is one of maximizing efficiencies through performance-measured motivation. Addressing each positions efficiency through continued motivation results in fiscal prudence, value for residents and high morale amongst employees. Initial selection of employees also is part of our overall approach as the program looks at performance based personnel with job-required capabilities who can adapt and perform to the unique needs of the Pelican Bay Community. With this program, the staff of the Pelican Bay Services Division has produced excellent results and returned value to the Community. With continued effort, the staff is expected to perform at equally high levels on the operational responsibilities of the coming years. Public Communication - Providing the public with information on their government's actions is a core component to our firm's services and operational philosophy. Our approach is to make the Divisions information available to all who may wish to review it through on-site records, public notices, public meetings, newsletters and the Internet. Through the Internet we can provide information to the public for their review on their time basis. Understanding that residents have their own priorities which may conflict with the District's presentation of information suggests that information be provided for public consumption at their availability. We believe the Internet provides an effective means of bringing information to the public in a timely and accessible manner. _ Section 3, Page 3 Special projects considered by the Board including such diverse topics as Clam Bay Restoration, R.O.W. Landscape Re-Design, Inter-Local Maintenance Agreements, Signage & Street Light Replacement, require another level of skills and experience. Our program incorporates the depth of our work in the State of Florida, over the last 25 years, with over 150 similar clients. We believe this history makes our firm unequalled in this skill set. The special project skill set is an expansion of the fundamental duties which include policy implementation, visioning, Community input, contract management, etc. Each special project of course is unique and requires additional capabilities of the Service Provider. ST-Moyer is capable of addressing an extremely diverse special project request due in large part to our extensive experience with similar communities. Our approach recognizes this capability and applies these resources in the normal course of operations. We do not separate this from our contract service or add costs to the client through outside souming. We believe this capability is an asset we bring that other service providers cannot match. Section 3, Page 4 16J Past Performance ST-Moyer would like to present the results of its management experience in supporting and facilitating the activities and service of the Pelican Bay Services Division, as we believe that this part of our experience is most relevant to the future services being sought in this RFP. Additionally, we would like to direct the Reader's attention to the Appendix, where we present information on our services and performance for some of our Company's other local government clients. ST-Moyer assisted the Distdct in accomplishing the following major initiatives for the Pelican Bay Community: Fiscal Year 1999 1. Initiated of a community-wide exotic species removal and maintenance program in light of uncertain responsibilities under existing government codes. 2. Reached an agreement with the County to fund a portion of the capital costs for landscaping the U.S. 41 median and the County maintaining the entire system at its cost. The County funded construction of the Gulf Park Drive to Seagate in Fiscal Year 2000 Budget and the Vanderbilt Beach Road to Gulf Park section in the Fiscal Year 2002 Budget. 3. Began the implementation of the Clam Bay Restoration & Management Plan. Completed aggressive dredging of Clam Pass and several constricted tidal channels, along with the installation of new culvert pipes with flap-gates in Seagate. This first stage resulted in substantially increased tidal flow into the Clam Bay estuaries, increasing the health of the mangroves and making the forest less susceptible to flooding. Fiscal Year 2000 1. Replaced the wood traffic signs with new aluminum signs, with a Verde Green Color and included on all of our new sighs is our signature. 2. Completed required studies of the Pelican Bay water management system and obtained acceptance by the regulatory agencies. 3. Designed and implemented a comprehensive exotic removal program. Such efforts prevented plants like Brazilian Pepper and Melaleuca from overtaking native species and lowering ground water quality. 4. Dredged an additional 125 interior tidal channels, removed approximately 50% of the dead mangrove material and initiated seeding of the area with new mangrove plants. Section 4, Page 1 16J 1 Fiscal Year 2001 1. Replaced entryways at Pelican Bay Boulevard, the North and South entrance, along with the Gulf Park Drive entrance. These new entry features included a vertical wall and columns separated by decorative iron, also with our signature Pelican. The landscaping at the entranceways has been completely renovated and accented by lighting at night. 2. Replaced the existing street lights with octagon concrete poles, in a light taupe with improved Metal halide lighting fixtures on all of the light poles. Many of these new poles have been moved to provide better lighting throughout the Community, and their locations have been coordinated with our landscaping replacement program. 3. Completed restoration of the irrigation and landscaping from Pelican Bay Boulevard, South entrance, to Gulf Park Drive to establish a consistent landscape palate of plant materials along the roadway corridors, improving traffic visibility, and locating materials to take better advantage of the street lights in the roadway corridors. 4. Dredged approximately 6,000 linear feet of interior tidal channels in Upper Clam Bay, constructed 18 mangrove starter islands planted with red and black mangroves, removed approximately 50% of dead mangrove material and initiated cattail removal program. _ Section 4, Page 2 References: Client Name Pelican Bay Services Division City of Weston Pelican Marsh Community Development District Contact Person Lou Vlasho, Chairman of Pelican Bay Services Division Advisory Committee John R. Flint, City Manager Gordon M. Brown, Chairman of the Board Phone Number (239) 591-3248 (954) 385-2000 (941) 514-7755 16J 1 E-mail Iouvlasho@ aol.com flintj @ westonfl.org gmbrownose @ aol.com Section 4, Page 3 16J Cost Proposal ST-Moyer would like to propose to provide all services described in this RFP for the period of 3 years, commencing on January 1, 2003 and ending on December 31,2005 for a fixed annual amount of $48,000. This amount is inclusive of all services to be provided under this contract. Section 5, Page 1 PROPOSERS QUALIFICATION FORM 16J LIST MAJOR WORK PRESENTLY UNDER CONTRACT: Entity/Firm Name Contract Tvoe City of Weston Municipal, Administrative, Clerking, Finance, Budgets, Information Technology Services (ITS), Park & Recreation Public Works Contract Amount $ 3,109,096.00 Village of Finance, Budgets Key Biscayne $ 65,000.00 Town of Miami Lakes Municipal, Finance, Budgets, ITS $ 424,000.00 Community Development Districts in the State of Florida: County # of Districts County # of Districts Bay County 2 Manatee 7 Brevard 3 Marion 2 Broward 10 Orange 6 Charlotte 1 Osceola 12 Citrus 1 Palm Beach 6 Clay 2 Pasco 6 Collier 10 Pinellas 1 Dade 2 Polk 5 Flagler 2 Sarasota 2 Hemando 3 Seminole 1 Hillsborough 14 St. Johns 3 Lake 5 St. Lucie 9 Lee 15 Sumter 4 Leon 3 Volusia 1 Walton 1 $ NIA Have you, at any time, failed to complete a contract? [_] Yes [x] No (If the answer is yes, submit details on separate sheet.) Statement of Litigation Are there any judgments, claims or suits pending or outstanding b_y o_[r a,cjainst you? [_] Yes [x] No If the answer to either question is yes, submit details on separate sheet. RFP ~02-3411 "Management Services ['or Pelican Bay Services Division'~ 163 1t List all lawsuits that have been filed by or against your firm in the last five (5) years: NIA REFERENCES: Bank(s) Maintaining Account(s): Mellon Bank, N.A. Seventh & Market Streets Philadelphia, PA 19101-7899 TYPE OF FIRM: X Corporation/Years in Business: 17 If firm is a corporation, please list state in which it is incorporated: Texas If firm is a corporation, by signing this form, proposer certifies that the firm is authorized to do business in the State of Florida. Partnership/Years in Business: Sole Proprietorship/Years in Business: Other: Please list: CONFLICT OF INTEREST Firm represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. Firm further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. Pursuant to information for prospective bidders/proposers for the above-mentioned proposed project, the undersigned is submitting the information as required with the understanding that it is only to assist in determining the qualifications of the organization to perform the type and magnitude of work intended, and further, guarantee the truth and accuracy of all statements herein made. We will accept your determination of qualifications without prejudice. Name of Organization: ST-Moyer By: / Title: Vice President of Operations Attested By: Title: Financial Analyst Date: August 14, 2002 INSURANCE TYPE RFP g02-$411 ,,Mo__nn£etnent Services for Pelican Ba~ Services Division" Collier County Florida Insurance Requirements REQUIRED LIMITS 1_t X 1. Worker's Compensation X 2. X m,, X Statutory Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements. Commercial General Liability. (Occurrence Form) patterned after the 1985 I.S.O form with no limiting endorsements. Bodily Iniury & Property Damage $1,000,000 Single Limit Per Occurrence INDEMNIFICATION: The Consultant, in consideration of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged through the signing of this document, shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold Collier County and its officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any and all losses, penalties, damages, professional fees, including attorney fees and all costs of litigation and judgments arising out of any willful misconduct or negligent act, error or omission of the Consultant, its subconsultants, agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by any employee of the named Consultant, any subconsultant, subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. 4. Automobile Liability Owned/Non-owned/Hired Automobile Included $ 500,000 Each Occurrence 5. Other Insurance as indicated below: a) Professional Liability $1,000,000 The Proposer shall be solely responsible to parties with whom it shall deal in carrying out the terms of this agreement and shall indemnify and hold the County harmless against all claims arising from the negligent acts, errors or omissions of consultant by third parties. The Proposer shall carry a professional liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000. X RFP 1t02-3411 "Management Services for Pelican Ba~ Services Division" 6. Contractor shall insure that all subcontractors cOmply with the same X 16J 1' insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required:insurance provisions. Collier County must be named as "ADDITIONAL INSURED" on the Insurance Certificate for Commercial General Liability where required. Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall be named as the Certificate Holder. NOTE--The "Certificate Holder" should read as follows: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Naples, Florida No County Division, Department, or individual name should appear on the Certificate. No other format will be acceptable. X 9. Thirty (30) Days Cancellation Notice required. X 10. The Certificate must state the Bid Number and Title. BIDDERS AND INSURANCE AGENT STATEMENT: -We understand the insurance requirements of these specifications and that the evidence of insurability may be required within five (5) days of the award of bid. ST-Moyer Bidder Sigp'~ture of Bidder MARSH USA INC. Insurance Agency Signature of Bidder's Agent Please see the enclosed example of Certificate of Insurance we provide our clients, The same will be provided to Collier County, with any and all type and limits required. 'MARSH usk'lNc, TWO LOGAN SQUARE 7 LADELPHIA, PA 19103-279 ~7.1-TIL-02 ( CB-3-TCT-02 (l) HIRED AUTOS i NON-OWNED AUTOS ~ GARAGE LIABILIT '~1T~I ANY 03~1~2 ;,16103035~8180963306 ,TC2J-UB 189Kh5-u-02 .03131102 EMPLOYERS' LIAalLITY i(AOS) ~E pROPm~O~ ~ ~NCL ITRJ-UB189K446-A-02 OFF.ERS ARE' I , ~E~ OR ~ETENTIONSI ~lON OF OPERATION~CATIONSNEHICL~8 City of Westen is included as additional Insured with regals to the general and automobile liabili~ pl)liclas. CERTIFICATE HOLDER , .- -CANCE~TION ":': :"" "cERTIFIcATE OF ·"":' "" '' ; I IIIIJlO Al i MATTER OF INFORM&¥10H ONLY Ail) CONFERS / PO~Y- THI~ GERTIFICATE DOll Rvi ~-~.~- - AFFORDED BY THE POLED OE~"?;n HEREIN. ,, ~ ' COMPARES AFFORDING COVERAGE : C~PA~ JP-0D-0~ 0810 ~ ~ A ZURICH ~ERI~N INSUR~CE COMPANY ...... ~ B - INSURED T~VELERS INDEMNI~ COMPLY OF I~UNOIS S~RN TRENT SER~CES, INC. i _. . --~ - .................... ENV~ONMENTAL SER~CES GROUP c~PA~Y . ._ 16337 PARK ROW . T~VELERS INDEMNI~ COMPANY ~ CONNEC~UT HOUSTON, ~ 77064 ......................... COVE~GES . ~is ~ supe~.a~ ~ ~ - . ........ ~ ~ FO. ~ ~y ~ Is~o ~ IS TO CER~FY ~T pO~IES OF y T OR O~R DOC~.-, ~ or such ~uc~s. L~ No~HST~ING ~Y REQU~E~. TE~ ~ co~m~ OF ~ C~~C ......... -= C~ ~ pE~NN. THE INSURE ~FORDEO BY ~E POUC~S DE~ ~lN ~ ~U~EC1 t u ~ m= ,=~. co ~ TYPE OF INSURANCE ~ ~ POUCY HUM ' POUCY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION ~ UMITB G~Ioo~Y) DATE (MM~D~YI ' ~ I I . i GENERAC L~ABIUTY [GL03373714-00 03131102 0~1103 ~RODUCTS- C~ ~ ! $ ' ~ o~ER= & c~TOR'S .O~ ~ ~ ~i~E ~ m.~ ~ 1,0~,0~ ~ ~ [ 'MEn~ ~ 5,000 1~ COMBINED SINGLE L~ S ~ ,000,000 B ~ ~AUTO [~J CAP 189K447-1-~L-02 S) [03131102 .03/31103 ............ ~ ..... C i I ALL O~ED AUTOS ~E CAP 189K448-3-TCT~2 (~ t03131/02 ~03131/03 ' ~ODILYINJURY , (p~ ~man) I ~: SCHE~LEDAUTOS ~ 6QO~Y INJURY [Pl~ I PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT ~ AOGReO~Te S lO,~O.O00 03~1103 E~H OCCURRENCE 10,~.000 AGGRE~TE ~-~-'-,o f Weston 'l. University Drive .... e 301 Coral Springs, FL 33071 I EL DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT 500,OOO ~ USA INC. [~y: Martin J Samcha~k MMtIelgQ) VALID AS OF: 03/31102 RFP #02-3411 "Management Services for. Pelican Bay Services Division" 16J 1 PROPOSER CHECK LIST I M P O R T A N T: Please read carefully, sign in the spaces indicated and return with your Proposal. Proposer should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed: 1. The Proposal and all required forms have been signed. 2. All information as requested in the Proposal is included. Correct number of proposal copies and one clearly marked "Original" have been provided. 4. Any addenda have been signed and included. 5. The mailing envelope or boxes have been addressed to: Purchasing Director Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Building, Bldg "G" 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 The mailing envelopes or boxes must, be sealed and marked with Proposal Number, Proposal Title and Due Date. The Proposal will be'mailed or delivered in time to be received no later than the specified due date and time. ALL COURIER-DELIVERED PROPOSALS MUST HAVE THE RFP NUMBER AND TITLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE COURIER PACKET Company Name ST-Moyer S ig n atu re an d Title /~'~/~',~/2L,_/X;;~'~! ~ice-President of Operations Date A.E,,_~r lA: ?NN? 18 RFP #02-3411 ~Management Services for Pelican Bay Services Division PROJECT PROPOSAL- DECLARATION STATEMENT . i BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida 34112 RE: RFP NO. 02-3411 -- "Management Services for Pelican Bay Services Division" ~Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as biddeflproposer (herein used in the masculine, singular, irrespective of actual gender and :~ number) declares that he is the only person interested in this proposal or in the contract to which this proposal pertains, and that this proposal is made without connection or arrangement with any other person and this --'. proposal is in every respect fair and made in good faith, without collusion or fraud. ii ~ The proposer further declares that he has Complied in every respect with all the Instructions to Proposers issued --', prior to the opening of proposals, and that he has satisfied himself fully relative to all matters and conditions with :~ respect to the general condition of the contract to which the proposal pertains. The proposer puts forth and agrees, if this proposal is accepted, to execute an appropriate Collier County --'!document for the purpose of establishing a formal contractual relationship between him, and Collier County, for the performance of all requirements to which the proposal pertains. The proposer states that the proposal is based upon the proposal documents listed by RFP #02-3411. _, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this 14th day of August ..... 2002 in the County of Broward , in the state of Florida Severn Trent Services, Inc. Proposer's Firm or Trade Name ~(~[poration ~Sole Proprietorship, ]~R~?~[~ (Circle One) Phone No. 954-753-5841 210 North University Drive, Suite 702 Address Coral Springs~ FL 33071 City and State Zip BY: ~ Typed and Writter{~ignature JVice-President of Operations Title 19 16J Appendix- Additional Information The following pages present additional information on the management activities of ST-Moyer for some of our Special-Purpose Local Government clients in the State of Florida. Section 7, Page 1 Community D~ velopment District - LOCATION: ~: Lee County ACRES: 328 ESTABLISHED: November 3, 1993 COUNTY: Lee BONDS ISSUED: Pending DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Water, Sewer and Irrigation Facilities, Roadway, ~'ater Management, Roadway Lighting, Landscaping Berms, Kecreation, Parks & Security. The DistricT The District is located in Lee County, Florida. It wos established fo provide public improvements ond to deliver community development services in the area of the District thereby providing a solution fo the County's plonning, management and financing needs for delivery of capital infrastructure within that portion of Lee County encompassed by the District. The District is a community development district organized and existing under the Constitution and taws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section 190.014, Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of law (the "Act"). It was established by County Ordinance c)3~33 of the Board of County Commissioner's of Lee County~ Florida on November 3, lqg3. The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulohons with respect to any proiects of the DistricL and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of o community development district is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any ~mprovement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Ach for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of District Projects _ 6J The Development is currently marketed as an up- scole~ master-planned communJty, offering o variety of home products (including singledamily homes and home sites, coach homes, villas and condominiums) with prices ranging from the $150,000's to over $c)00,000. A variety of recreational facilities are located within the Development including the following: Pelican's Nest Golf Club - Pelican's Nest Golf Club, on upscate daily-fee 36-hole course designed by '[om Fazio is ranked in the nation's top 25 public courses by Gotf Digest, Tennis - Phase I of o comptete tennis center, including six courts and o clubhouse facility. Canoe Park - A canoe pork, bunch, boardwalk, picnic area and boat slips along Spring Creek. Beach Park - The 34-acre beach park located atong the C~utf of Mexico is accessible by Pelican Landings private water taxk The water taxi launches from Coconut Point at the northwestern edge of Pelican Landing. Construction of a beach facility began in January lC~C~5. The facility Jnciudes on open-air povjhon, restrooms and shower facilities. Redfish Point Redfish Point ts o casual, indoor/outdoor eatery located along the banks of Spring Creek between the finishing holes of Pehcon's Nest golf course. A boardwalk and shallow-craft boat slips are located at Redfish Point. Pehcon's Nest Clubhouse - This 13,000 square foot facility includes a sphtdevel restaurant, private dining room locker rooms, lounge, and a 2,700 square foot golf shop. Resident and non-resident dining memberships are available for the Club and Redfish Point. Bay Creek is a 328- acre planned community and golf course development located in southern Lee County. The property is partially developed having started construction in 1993. The District is bounded on the north and west by Pehcan Landing, on the east by U,S. 4] and on the south by Spring Creek. Improvements in the District will include roadway, drainage, water management, potable water, sanitary sewer, irrigation, street lighting and security. The proiect stormwater management system will consist of interconnected excavated lakes, culverts, swales, control structures, and natural areas which will collect, store and treat the proiect runoff. The system wiJJ ultimately discharge into Spring Creek or an existing outfaJl fJowway which runs north to south bisecting the development. Stormwater discharges will be regulated with control structures District Projects 16J 1 designed to provide treatment and attenuation of runoff from the project. Conditions of the South Florida Water Management permit as well as other state and federal permits require various types of wetland mitigation activities. During Phase I, mitigation consists primarily of removal of exotic vegetation in existing wetland areas. Phase It will involve wetland enhancement, restoration and wetland creation as well as additional removal of exotics. In addition to the Phase II facilities identified above, a control structure will be installed in the tributary of Spring Creek which runs through the project, This control structure will provide control of groundwater and stormwater flows for that portion of the proiect north of the existing Bay Creek Drive. The irrigation system components include the wells, weltfieJd transmission lines, and the pumping facilities. Four (4), shallow groundwater wells will be utilized as a source of irrigation water for the proiect. These wells wilt pump groundwater into lakes near the project entrance from which the pump station wilt draw water for distribution to the proiect. The pumping facility includes an intake structure in the lake, a wetwell from which the vertical turbine pumps draw water, the pumping equipment with hydropneumatic tank and a building to house and protect the pumping equipment. The project will be served by one primary entrance at U.S. 41 onto Pelican's Nest Drive. This roadway intersects Bay Creek Drive at the southwest corner of the site, providing access to and from the existing Pelican Landing development. The main roadway will be complete with Jandscaping~ street lighting, a bridge and privacy gate at the entrance. Primary roadways will also be provided to provide access to select single family residential areas, the commercial area in the northeast portion of the project and the multi-family area in the southeast portion of the property Street lighting and limited landscaping will also be provided for the secondary streets. Water will be provided by Bonita Springs Utilities, Inc, through existing 12'~ water mains in the U.S. 41 right-of way and at existing Bay Creek Drive. A series of water main extensions and loops will provide service throughout the project. This system will provide both potable water and fire protection for the project. The proiect will be served by a central irrigation pumping and distribution network. That system will consist of a surficial groundwater wellfield, lined water management lakes for storage, central pump station and distribution network. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by Bonita Springs Utilities, Inc. through an existing t2~' force main ~n the U.S. 41 right-of-way. Gravity collection systems will be constructed throughout the project and will utilize several pump stations and a force main system connecting to the existing Bonita Springs Utilities force mare. Recreation amenities include a Creek Park with boating facilities, common area improvements, and a pro-rata share of Pelican Landing Beach Park. Project security will be provided via a manned guard house and privacy gate system at the entrance to the project as well as strategically located fencing and lighting. Automated privacy gates will also be placed at entrances to select subdivisions within the proiect. Community Improvement Development District LOCATION: W. Lee County. ACRES: 1,779 ESTABLISHED: August 14, 1991 COUNTY: Lee BONDS ISSUED: Pending DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Water, Sewer and Irrigation Facilities, Earthwork, ~'ater Management, Roadway Lighting, Landscaping & Berms, Recreation, Parks & Security, '~'etland Mitigation, Off-Site hnprovements. The District The District is located in Lee County, Florida. It was estobhshed fo provide public improvements and fo deliver community development services ~n the oreo of the District thereby providing o solution fo the County's planning, management and financing needs for delivery of capital infrastructure within that portion of Lee County encompassed by the District. The District is o community development distract organized and existing under the Constitution and taws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section 190.014, Florida Statutes and other applicable prowsions of law (the "Act"[ It was established on August 14 1991, pursuant to the Rules and Regulations of the State of Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission, The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as o governing body of the District, The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect to any proiects of the District,, and to enforce penalties for the woiation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any ~mprovement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District District Projects Pelican Landing Communities, Inc. (the ~DeveJoper") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of WCl Communities, Inc. ('*WCt")located in Naples, Florida, which is the subsidiary responsible for the community and land development programs of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a publicly- owned corporation traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Over the past four decades, WCI has been responsible for the management and development of more than 58,000 acres in the United States. Located in Bonita Springs, Pelican Landing encompasses 2,365 acres bordered on the south by Sprtng Creek, designated a "Florid Outstanding Water" and on the west by Estero Bay, an aquatic preserve leading to the Gulf of Mexico. The community hod its early start in ~ lg85 with the creation of the 18-hole Pehcan's Nest Golf Club. The course, set on 369 acres, was specifically designed by Westinghouse to serve as the course of play for the Ritz-Carlton and Registry hotel guests from the sister community of Pelican Bay. The development company of Westinghouse Bayside Communities, Inc., (WBC), a subsidiary of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, was formulated in 1989, and the creation of the total community of Pelican Landing began. The first residents of the community moved into Pelican Landing in February 1990. Today, about 700 families live in Pelican Landing. Currently a total of 396 single family home sites and 700 multi-family units have been sold. Build out of Pelican Landing is expected in 2003 with approximately 4,850 total units. The approved development plan also allows for up to 615000 square feet (gross)of retail commercial and 210000 square feet of office commercial space. The project wilt also include o 45Groom hotel with a 50,000 square foot conference center. A marina containing up to 65 wet boat slips and 150 dry boat storage umts has been approved. To simplify ~ts name and to better identify with the community. WBC changed its name in early 1994 to Pelican Landing e Communities. Inc. nt Dixtrict District Projects 16J Pelican Landing is currently marketed as an up- scale, master-planned community, offering a variety of home products (including single-family homes and home sites, coach homes, villas and condominiums) with prices ranging from the $150,000's to over $900,000 The Development was named Lee County's Community of the Year by the Sales and Marketing Council of the Lee Building Industry Association for 1991. District projects include roadway construction, complete with lighting and landscaping, potabl~ wafer. ~rrigation and sanitary sewer systems water management facilities, potable water, irrigation and samtary sewer systems, water management facilities,, local subdivision improvements, as welt as permitting and engineering services. Facilities will also be constructed to house the District maintenance and operation staff and equipment, District projects wiJJ support residential and non-residential land uses. JIF/ ~nt 5D£~trict LOCATION: ACRES: 473 ESTABLISHED: June 24, 1992 COUNTY: Brevard BONDS ISSUED: $10,800,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Co m m ~laoi-~f~m~e ~n~t~Dis tri c t Central Brevard County 16J SurGce Water Management, Roads, Strcetlights, Culverts, Water and ~rastewater Facilities, Landscaping, Mosquito Control, Parks and Recreation Facilities, and Security Facilities. The DisTriCT The District encompasses approximately 473 acres in central Brevard County, Florida. The District is approximately 60 miles southeast of Orlando, 5 miles west of the City of Melbourne, lust east of Interstate 95, and adjacent to the western boundary of Suntree P.U.D. within the master planned town of Viera. The District was established on June 24, 1992 by ordinance of the Brevard County Board of County Commissioners. The District is an independent unit of local government organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section 190.014, Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of Jaw (the "Act"}. The Act provides for a five member Board of rules and regulations with respect to any projects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations~ The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facJhty constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of,,.a _ the District. the District The Act empowers the Board ~ of Supervisors to adopt administrative District Projects l_6J 1_' The District encompasses approximately 473 acres ~n central Brevord County, Florida. The District is approximately 60 miles southeast of Orlando ,5 miles west of the City of Melbourne, just east of interstate c~5, and adjacent to the western boundary of Suntree RU.D. within the master-planned town of Viera. The District was established on June 24, 19c~2 by ordinance of the Brevard County Board of County Commissioners. The Baytree Community Development District (District) is a Planned Unit Development (PUDJ. The lands within the District are under development and it is the objective of the District to assist in providing and maintaining the infrastructure (the "Project") necessary for the development of residential dwelling units, recreational and other land uses as approved within Brevord County Zoning Resolution Z8540 effective date of January 22 tqc~O. Infrastructure improvements within the District are being constructed in two phases - Phase (1992 1994) and Phase I1 (1995-1997). Land use within the District Js proposed to consist of residential dwelling units, two parks, a golf course, and related facilities, The development has been approved by Brevard County for ~ a maximum of 525 residential dwethng units. Phase I construction shall Jnctude (1) the excavation of a maiority of the surface k.,~,/(.~/~.,,~/7'CC water management lakes, interconnecting culverts and discharge control structures, (2j construction of the main roadway (Baytree Drive) from Wickham Road south to the existing Key Royale Street and (3) construchon of all roadways w~thin the northern portion of the development, down to and including Champions Club Drive, including all necessary storm drainage and curbing. Additionally, Phase J wastewater facility construction shall include the construction of the ma~n sanitary sewage pumping station and the force ma~n connection to an existing Brevard County transmission main at Wickhom Road and o gravity sanitary sewer collection system serving the northern portion of the Project, down to and including Champions Club Drive. Further, Phase 1 potable water facility construction shall ~nclude connection to existing City of Cocoa transmission mains at Wickham Road and at Key Royale Street within the Suntree development as well os the construction of transmission mains along ali roadways in the northern section of the Project, down to and including Champions Club Drive. Finally, Phase I construction will include landscaping, mosquito control facilities, parks and recreation facilities and security facihtles servicing the entire Distr~ct. Completion of Phase J construction will provide the required ~nfrostructure to allow' for the District Projects z6J development and sate of 305 single family lots. Phase II construction will include: (1) the construction of the remaining port(on of the Master Water Management System, including any interconnecting culverts and control structures, (2) construction of all roadways in the southern portion of the Proiect, including, any required curbing and storm drainage, and (3) fha construction of all wosfewafer and wafer facilities in the southern portion of the Prelect, including a small sanitary sewage lift station facihfy. Review of the Brevard County Comprehensive Pian (the "County Plan") indicates that development within the D~strict ts consistent with the County Plan and future land use mop. The land is properly zoned for the anticipated development of the property Jmprovernents proposed for the Proiect, which wilt be constructed by the District, will include the following: Surface Water Management System Roads, street lighting and culverts vcbfer and wastewa~er facilities Landscaping Mosquito Control Par/~s ¢ Recreation Facilities Security Faci!tties Surlace Wa~er ManageMen'~ SYsteM -[he District will construct a series lakes, interconnecting culverts and discharge control structures and connect tines focJhfJes fo some of for pre-development versus post--development runoff attenuation and water qualify treatment. In general, stormwater runoff will sheet flow from the lots to the roads and conveyance swales and into the take/wetland system by a series of inlet structures and storm sewer culverts. Control structures will consist of we~r structures for attenuation, as welt as bleed-down devices sized to recover the required treatment volume. The Master Land Use Plan was developed to minimize wetland impacts. However, a total of 2.01 acres of wetlands will be impacted, due primarily to the construction of District roadways. Mitigation for these impacts include the creation of 1.14 acres of hardwood wetlands, 1.O1 acres of herbaceous wetlands and 1.4q acres of up(and buffer areas. This mihgation plan has been reviewed arid approved by Brevard County, SJRWMD and the U S Army Corps of Engineers. roads. S"~ree'~ Ligh'~ing and Culverts The District will construct the roadway network. Work to be completed includes clearing of the roadway areas, installation of the required storm sewer culverts, necessary roadway embankment, construction of the pavement structures, curbing and pedestrian/bike ways (along Baytree Drive only). The District wilt also complete whatever stabilization (seed and mulchl necessary to prevent erosion and washouts within District roadways. With the exception of the northern *800 LF of Baytree Drive, which will be a four-Jane facility, alt District roadways will be two-lane facihhes, the on-site preserved wetlands to form a wet detent(on stormwoter management facility. The D~stricts stormwater management facility will conform to the Brevard County and ,St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD)criteria designed to allow access to properties within the District os well as to provide the necessary levels of traffic service to users within the District, Alt District roadways shall be constructed in accordance with current Brevard DistricT ProjecTs 16d County standards, The District will also provide street lighting where appropriate for District roc~dways. Water and Waste~vater Eacilities The District will provide water and wastewater services through two (2) separate categories of facihties: (!) Maior Mains and (2) Subdivision Lines. (1) Maior Mains-Cons(st of all water lines 8- inches and greater in diameter, all major gravity interceptor sewers, all force mains and all lift stations and related appurtenances. (2) Subdivision Lines-Consists of all water hnes tess than S-inches and gravity mains within the subdivision tracts, including services to each lot or tract, The City of Cocoa (potable water) and Brevard County (wastewater) have existing facilities adiacent to the District, and will provide retail service to lands within the District: additionally, these units of government will provide maintenance, bJJhng and administrative services required for fun potable water and wastewater services for customers within the District. All facilities constructed by the District will be dedicated to the City of Cocoa (potable water) or Brevard County (wastewater), Design of the water distribution system for potable water and fire protection wilt be ~n accordance with the criteria and guidelines of the City of Cocoa and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, The main point of connection to the Brevard County wostewater collection system wJJJ be to an existing 24'~ force main located on Wickham Road. The District wilt construct two (2) or>site lift stations which will be sufficient to serve all proposed development within the District, The wastewater collection system serving lands within the District has been designed in accordance with applicable Brevard County and Florida Department of Environmental Regulation criteria. Landscaping The District will make Landscaping improvements at the proiect entrances and common areas throughout the Project site. Improvements will include the removal of alt non,,native plant spec(es and re-seed or sod affected areas. MosQuito Con i'rol The District intends to purchase a truck and sprayer to assist in mosquito controk The District may utilize ~ts own Staff or contract for th~s activity_ Parks and recreation Facilities The District w'dJ construct, operate and own two (2) park facilities which may include playground equipment, nature trails, picnic facilities and other recreational facilities. Total acreage Jn the District for active parks is 2.c)2 acres. Securi'~, Facili'~ les The District will construct security facilities at both entrances to the District. These facilities will include a guard house facility at the north end of Boytree Drive, os well as an automatic gate facility et the eastern entrance to the District adiacent to Suntree. The District expects to maintain these facilities. 16J Community Development District LOCATION: Osceola County ACRES: 6,548 ESTABLISHED: March 29, 1994 COUNTY: Osceola BONDS ISSUED: $63,455,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & ~>'~' IMPROVEMENTS: Roadways, Water, Sewer and Reuse Utilities, Earthwork, Water Management, Roadway Lighting, Landscaping & Berms, Parks & Recreation, Wetland Mitigation, Off-Site Improvements. III ' Ill I Il Ill I Ill Illll!llllllll!lllll!ll!ll!!!ll!lllll!lll III! Ill I ]l!lllll'l IllJ Illl I The District The Celebration Community Development District ICelebration CDD), pursuant to the provisions of Chapter lqO, Florida Statutes, was established by rule of the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission March 29, 1994. The Celebration District comprises approximately 6,548 acres within Osceota County~ Florida. The District is contiguous to the Walt Disney World Resort in central Florida. The District is expected to be developed in phases spanning approximately fifteen years. Each phase is expected to encompass one or more Villages. Phase I, currently under construction, is for the Celebration Village. The District is a community development district organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section 190.O14, Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of Jaw (the 'Act"). The .Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as o governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect fo any proiecfs of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. ]'he Act permits the Board of Supervisors fo levy faxes under certain conditions, and fo levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facihfies. The chief administrative official of o community development district is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facJhty constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the eqmpment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. District Projects 16J 1! The Celebration District is anticipated to have o unique mix of single and multi-family residences, with support faciJJhes, ov~c facJhtJes, retail establishments, recreational amenities and schools. This mix is currently divided into five 'Villages": Celebration, Lake, North, South and the Island Village. club is anticipated to be located southeast of the villages' residential area~ Lake Village Lake Village is scheduled to have fewer residences than Celebration Village and is located west of Olebrat ion ¥~llage Celebration Village is located directly south of Celebration Place buffered by the planned Celebration 18 hole golf course along the villages northern boundary, Celebration Village ~s scheduled to offer approximately 381 single family residences and 407 multi-family units. On the villages southwest side, a school will be located to serve the families of Celebration. The villages southern portion includes the retail shops of Town Center, A 40 room bad and breakfast is also planned os part of the retail area tn Town Center. A swim and tennis the Celebration Village and Town Center. Lake Village is anticipated to include 561 single family residences. No large retail establishments are planned for Lake Village. Lake Village is expected to commence development in 1c;g7. $otlh ¥~lbnge Located south of Lake Village, South Village is the largest of the Celebration CDD villages. South Village is anticipated to include 7@! single family residences and 270 multi-family units. A commercial area, located adjacent to the interchange at World gr~ve and DisTriCT Projects 16J 11 interstate 4, is anticipated to include approximately 600,000 square feet. The South Village is expected to commence development in lggS., with major development following one year later in 1999. South Village should be completed in 2002. Nortl~ Village The North Village is located along US 192, just east of Celebration Place and Celebration Village. North Village is expected to have approximately 370 single family residences and 504 multi-family units. Commercial sites are also located in the North Village, totaling approximately 28,500 square feet. North Village is scheduled to begin development in the year 2001 and be completed in 2003, Island Village The most southern village, Island Village is planned for 590 single-family residences and is anticipated to be the most exclusive of the villages in the Celebration CDD isolated by natural wetlands, access to the Island Village will be provided by a boulevard from the Interstate 4 and World Drive interchange to the village. Development of the island Village could be delayed untit the year 2005, with completion in the year 2007 The improvements to be constructed by the Districts wilt include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: Primary roadways and bridges Parcel (Village)-specific roads and bridges Street lighting Domestic water distribution system Wastewater/sanitary sewer collection system Reuse (reclaimed) water distribution system Stormwater management facilities Drainage collection systems Off-site roadways and intersection improvements Wetland compliance Common area development The parcel specific ~mprovements are those public infrastructure improvements specifically related to a given village or land use parcel. Examples of parcel specific improvements include earthwork for a specific village to collect and control stormwater runoff, the distribution of utilities, and associated primary infrastructure, The street tree program and landscape and irrigation of the parks and areas surrounding the lakes are all part of the parcel specific improvements. The infrastructure for each village consists of District Projects 16J roads and bridges, utilities, and site development, as described below. The improvements include the parcet's collector roads and secondary residential streets, roadway lighting and custom signage 'The improvements include potable water distribution systems, wastewater/sanitary sewer collection system, and reuse water distribution system. The improvements include earthwork, stormwater management and drainage collection systems, landscape and irrigation, hardscape, sidewalks, jogging trails, nature trails, entry features and parks. The Districts will be constructing all paving, grading, and drainage systems associated with the roadways, The roadways will consist of a stabilized subgrade, soil cement base and asphaltic concrete surface course, Jn accordance with the plans and specifications prepared during this phase of development. Signing, pavement markings, guardrails, sidewalks, and traffic signals wJtt also be constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared during this phase. The designs have been prepared in accordance with the current State of Florida Manual of Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance of Streets and Highways, Osceota County Road Construction Specifications, AASHTO policies and the Manual on Uniform '~raffic Control Devices. The purpose of the Celebration Stormwater Master Plan is to assure that adequate stormwater management facditJes are available to meet the regulatory requirements of the project. The Celebration Stormwater Master Plan identifies peak discharge rates, water quality requirements, 100 year floodplain elevations, groundwater flows. The proposed stormwater drainage system for the District will be reviewed by RCID, SFWMD, and Osceola County pr~or to construction. The drainage system wilt be consistent with the Celebration Stormwater Master Plan and will maintain existing drainage patterns to the greatest extent possible. In order to facilitate development of the Celebration proiect, it will be necessary to relocate the existing 18" high pressure gas transmission main owned and operated by ENRON Gas Pipeline Operating Co., and the high voltage overhead electric service lines owned by Florida Power Company (FPC) and the Orlando Utilities Commission (OUC) Common area development os it relates tO that portion of the primary infrastructure generally includes the following: Common area development lor the right-of-ways of primary roadways including: landscaping, irrigation system including controls, piping, and heads; and transit stops. The road related utilities include the District Projects 16J 1' underground duct bank system necessary to support the street lighting and signalization within the prolect C~eneraJ infrastructure may be described as those elements of design and engineering that are necessary to support the primary infrastructure work and the parcel development work. Examples of elements of general infrastructure include work such as conceptual engineering, scheduling, piezometer installation and monitoring, prehminary and final topographic surveys, and other miscellaneous professional services. Construction of the primary infrastructure improvements identified as water, sewer and effluent reuse, will be completed by the Enterprise CDD and provided to the Celebration CDD through an interlocal agreement. The water, sewer and effluent reuse will be supplied to the Enterprise CDD by the City of Kissimmee. The potable water infrastructure mains range in size from 6" through 24~' in diameter~ Ail new water mains will meet the design criteria set forth in the Districts' Permit Criteria Manual and will include the appurtenant fittings, valves, and valve boxes to effect service to properties contiguous to the roadways. A central wastewater collection system wilt be installed within the roadways. The system will include a series of manifolded pump stations. Each pump station will collect the raw wastewater within its service area (generally o specific village or portion thereof). The primary infrastructure includes forcemains, ranging in size from though 20", and pump stations, as welt as the appurtenant fittings, valves, and flow meters required to connect the primary infrastructure to the City's wastewater system. reclaimed water from the City of Kissimmee facility to the Districts and its villages via a looped distribution system located within the roadways. The reclaimed water main piping system includes pipes, ranging in size from 8" to 20" in diameter. The system will include appurtenant valves, fittings and meters to deliver reclaimed water at the connection point of each village to the primary infrastructure at a pressure of 50 psi. With the development of the Celebration community, certain public roadways located outside of the district boundaries wilt require upgrades. The offisite road element apportions these external roadways improvements to each DJstr ici. There are several roadways directly adjacent to or bisecting the two Districts for which landscape and hardscape improvements are being planned. The reclaimed water system wilt deliver Community Development District LOCATION: 'Ihmpa ACRES: 587 ESTABLISHED: September 5, 1991 Photo Not Available COUNTY: Hillsboro BONDS ISSUED: $11,850,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Roadways, Utilities, Earthwork, Water Management, Roadway Lighting, I~mdscaping & 'Bcrms, Recreation, Parks & Securiu; 'Of/~tland Mitigation, Off-Site Improvements. Ill I I II I I I I II !il I The DisTriCT The District was esfobhshed on ,September 5, 19ql, and consists of an approximately 587 acre planned residential community surrounding a 150 acre man-made, fresh-water lake. The Development ~s a 587-acre planned residentiai community. The development is located on Highway 582-A (east Fletcher Avenue)in the "University North area of Hillsborough County ,n the City of Tampa, Florida The Interstate H~ghway (1-75} is five minutes away and the University of South Florida is approximately ten minutes away. Tampa's financial district and the Tampa International Airport are 20 and 2,5 minutes away, respectively. The District ~s a community development district organized and exishng under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section lq~0.014. Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of law (the "Act'). The Act pray,des for o five member Board of Supervisors to serve as o governing body of the District. The Act empov,,ers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect to any prolects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and reguJahor~s. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and fo levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative officJat of a community development district ~s the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and ~s responsible for preserving and maintaining any ~mprovement or focihty constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equlpmenf owned by the D~stricf, and for performing such duties os may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. District ProjecTs 16J 1 t The Cory Lake Community Development District (the ' District'S), encompasses approximately 587.62 acres within the city limits of Tampa, Hillsborough County~ Florida. The District was created for the purpose of financing and managing the acquisition, construction, maintenance and operation of a portion of the infrastructure necessary for the community development. The District is currently bounded by Hunter's Green development to the West, undeveloped range land to the north, an unincorporated large parcel metes and bounds community known as Bronchton to the East, and a t7,000 acre wilderness park managed by Hillsborough County to the south, Current plans for the District include approximately 716 single family units to be constructed in seven different phases. The District includes a proposed 150 acre lake with 10 miles of lake shoreline. Approximately t10 acres of the lake has been constructed to date. Approximately 50% of the homesites have lakeshore frontage. Approximately 75 of the homesites adioin the 17,OO0 acre wilderness park, Other maior features of the District include a community park and recreational area bordering the lake and the wilderness park and 72.3 acres of conservation wetlands. The community is a secured community with an entrance guardhouse. Major Infrastructure District completed projects are basically comprised of off-site water and sewer collection and distribution systems, master stormwater management infrastructure planning, construction of Cory Lakes Boulevard, neighborhood park, beach club and recreational facilities, entry guardhouse and landscaping, installation of underground power and acquisition of the Cory Lake's water management system, Current projects consist of the following: Stormwa~er Management To satisfy state and local drainage requirements of the development, a series of mammade detention facilities m combination with existing natural conservation storage areas are required. These detention and natural wetland areas, along with the lake system will serve as the primary stormwater management system Closed conduit along with a minimum of open channels wilt serve to convey stormwater runoff to the treatment areas and ultimately the receiving waters. The excavation of the monmade detention basins on the site has, with the take excavation, served to generate the fill for the development. The designed higher water elevations in the take serve as the orig~n for establishing the finish grades on site, Generally, the tow edge of the road pavement on site was estabhshed to be a minimum of 1 ft. above the 25-year design highwater elevation. Residential finished floor elevations are generally between 1 and 3 ft. above the low edge of the roadway, or higher and in all cases are above the 1OO~year flood elevation, The master drainage facilities along with the Phase 6 facilities consists of inlets, DBI's stormwater pipe, heodwalls, velocity dispersion ponds and treatment pond. Wasfewafer The District Js within the city limits of the City of Tampa, with wastewater treatment to be provided by the City of Tampa's Hookers Point plant. Zoning conditions and conditions of service commitment letters require wastewater service to be provided by the City of Tampa. District Projects l_6J 1_ District wostewater collection/transmission system consist of a gravity collection system with appurtenant manholes, forcemains and lift stations within Cory Lakes, Water System The District Js within the city limits of the City of Tampa; therefore, the City of Tampa Water Department will provide water service. Zoning conditions and conditions of service commitment letters require water service to be provided by the City of Tampa The District Water System includes distribution lines along with the appurtenant valves & fire hydrants within Cory Lakes. Roadways The guarded and main entrance to the Cory Lake Community Development District is located off County Road 579 (Morris Bridge Road), which is approximately 6 miles north of the intersection of State Road 582A (Fletcher Avenue) and Interstate 75, The entrance is approximately 6 miles south of the intersection of Morris Bridge Road and State Road 54. it is estimated that 93% of the traffic generated in connection with the District wJJl be directed to Interstate 75s interchanges with Fietcher Avenue and Fowler Avenue, and north and south otong the interstate from these two intersections. Subsequent phases may connect to new city and/or county rood facilities adioJmng the north boundary of the property. The county maintained Morris Bridge Rood has been widened and resurfaced within the last seven years. Jt remains a two lane rural section. Bicycle lanes hove been added within the lost two years from Cory Lake south to Fletcher Avenue, approximately 0 miles. The Development will be accessed by o landscaped boulevard section with an entrance and exit Guardhouse facihty. The boulevard will connect to a loop road known os Cory Lake Drive. All roadway construction will be to City of Tampa standards with municipal cross-section including curb and gutter. Brick pavers will be utilized for the road riding surface throughout the development. Phase 6 will connect to existing Cory Lake Drive. eowel' The District is within the Tampa Electric Company (TECO) service area TECO personnel have reviewed the prelect and purpose to provide power to the site from the public right-of-way of County Road 570 (Morris Bridge Road), THE COUNTRY CLUB OF MOUNT DORA Community Development District LOCATION: Mount Dora, Florida ACRES: 214 ESTABLISHED: August 1993 COUNTY: l.ake BONDS ISSUED: $~],505,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Water and W,~tewatcr Distribution and Collection Facilities, Roadwa)% Subdivision Improvements, Strcctlighting, Landscape, F~qrthwork, Water Management, Mitigation and Recreation and Park Facilities. The DiSTRiCT The District encompasses approximately 214 acres located in northeast Mount Dora, Florida. The District is approximately 20 miles northwest of Orlando. The District was established in August 19c~3 by ordinance of The City of Mount Dora, City Council. The Country Club of Mount Dora (the "Development') is a 439-acre master-planned golf course community in the City of Mount Dora, Florida. The Development is located in eastern Lake County on U.S. Highway 44t, approximately 20 miles northwest of Orlando and fifteen (15) miles east of Interstate 75. The District is an independent unit of local government created in accordance with the Uniform Community Development District Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Act") adopted by ordinance of the City of Mount Dora on August lC)C)3. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect to any proiects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments,, and to charge collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of o community development district is the D,strict Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the proms~ons of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the DistricL and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the Districk The Act provides for o five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the District. DistricT Projects 16J 11 The City approved the application for development of the Country Club of Mount Dora in November 199t, Under a Planned Unit Development ('PUD") ordinance passed by the City, the Development has been approved for 787 single family lots, an 18-hole golf course and clubhouse. No commercial zoning has been included within the Development. Prices for the home and site packages will range from $90000 for duplex units to $210,000 for homes built off of existing models offering a variety of floor plans for each model. Custom home packages within the Development hove ranged from $225,000 to $500000. There are currently nine (c~) model homes within the DeveJopmenk tt ~$ the obiective of the District to assist Jn providing and maintaining the infrastructure necessary for the development of residential dweJhng units and recreational uses as outhned in the District plans approved by the City of Mount Dora. The land use within the District consists of single family residential dwelling units and associated recreation facilities. The overall development has been approved for 787 residential units. The foftowmg improvements completed and/or proposed and will be the responsibility of the D~sfricf, ore RoAds. Smeet liqhrt~g /~.'wl Stcma,~ D~Ai,x,'~c~e B~ff:R DistRit)ution t~4ciliti~s ti~s n'~'~n:A, Collec t/on FacilIties Along ,'vl, ain And PaRk Surface Wa~er ManageMeni System The District Surface Water Management System will consist of o ser~es of ponds interconnected by storm drain culverts and discharge control structures. These ponds will retain the initial runoff from the developed tots and roadways providing pretreatment and runoff attenuation as required by the St~ Johns River Water Management District. The perimeter of the pond banks will be pianted with wetland species plants os required by St, Johns River Water Management District for mitigation from site impacts, All control structures will have bleeddown holes to recover the required treatment volume and to maintain control elevahons along with weirs to control discharge The site drainage system wiIJ be designed to provide adequate drainage and prevent flooding of roadways. All tot grading will be set to drain to the adiacent roadways to avoid standing water. roads, $, res ~ Ligh ~ing and S'~or~ Drainage Construction of the District Roadway Network consisted of District Projects 1.6J 1_I clearing of the 50 Rights-of-Ways along with odiocent JO~ utility eosements~ installation of underground water, sewer, storm drainage, electric, and irrigation and construction of base, and pavement and sidewalks. The District also constructed, street lights and landscape and irrigation along the main roadways. Ail roads have 50 foot Right-of- Ways, 12' lanes of pavement curbing and sidewalk on both sides. All road construction ~s in accordance with the City of Mount Dora's and Lake County minimum standards. xVa'~er Dis'~ribu~ion Svsi en~ Facilities The Water Distribution System for the DistrIct consists of a 12 inch feeder main in County Club Boulevard and 8 inch distribution mains looping through each parcek Fire hydrants have been set for fire protection and all construction will be per the City of Mount Dora, ~rhe Utility Company and the Department of Environmental Protection requirements. The water supply ms provided by the Dora Pines Mobile Home Estates Water Treatment Plant, which Js responsible for supplying water to the District.. xYasl es~sa~ er Colleclion Sx, s ieM Facili~ ies The Wostewater Collection System for the District consists of 8 inch gravity sewer mains, 6 inch sewer laterals, manholes, 2 pump stations and 6 inch and 4 inch force-mains. Ali construction is per the City of Mount Dora, the Utility Company and the Department of Environmental Protechon requirements. The Utility supplying services to the District is the Dora Pines Mobile Home Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant. Landscaping and Irrigation The District hose provided landscaping and irrigation along the main roadways, and within recreation and park areas throughout the Districk The District also has acc~uired the wetlands in Phase 11 along with a 10' natural vegetative buffer along the perimeter of the District property. Recreation and Park ,~reas The District Js constructing three (3) recreation areas throughout the proiect. Two of the areas will be passive park areas, the third will be a satellite recreation area with a small pool and cabana for use by District residents. LOCATION: ACRES: 2,575 ESTABLISHED: County: Clay BQND$ ISSUED: N.E. Clay County The Crossings Community Development District Ncwember 20, 1989 $63,205,000 'l. 6J 1t DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Roadwa5% Utilities, Subdivision Improvements, XX/atcr Management, Roadway Lighting, Landscaping & Berms, Recreational Facilities, Wetland Mitigation, Off-Site hnprovements. The DisTrict The District is located in the northeast porhon of Clay County {the "County"), approximately ]5 miles south of Jacksonville and t0 miles south of Jacksonville Naval Air Station, and consists of approximately 2,,575 acres. The District was established os o community development district, on independent district with special purposes organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the 5fate of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section 190,014, Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of law (the "Act"), and pursuant to a Rule adopted by the Florida Land and Water Adludicatory Commission (the Governor and Cabinet of the State of Florida) effective November 20 198q The Rule was adopted ~n response to a petition filed by the Landowner to create the District in order to provide infrastructure proiects to serve the Distr~ct. The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a govermng body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect to any projects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Superwsors to levy taxes under certain conditJons, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facihties. The chief administrative offioal of o community development district ~s the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and ~s responsible for preserwng and maintaining ar~y improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the AcL for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District, District Projects The Crossings at Fleming Island (the "Development") is a 2575-0cre master planned mixed-use community located at fha intersection of US 17 and County Road 220 on Fleming Island in Clay County, Florida. The Development is bordered by the Doctors Lake fo the north and west, with the St. Johns River in close proximity fo the east. The community currently contains on 18- hole championship golf course, o temporary clubhouse, a 125,OOO square foot shopping center currently anchored by a Publix, a $2.5 million water pork and fermis complex, 3 miles of paved bike frails, and 184 occupied homes. Future plans include construction of a waterfront park and a boot landing on Doctors Lake, and on elementary public school. Consfruchon of a permanent clubhouse is currently underway. The Development is permitted os a DRI with zoning for 4,622 tarot residential units, 1.36 million square feet of commercial/retail space, 1.96 million square feet of office space, and 0,849 million square feet of light industrial space. Currently underway, the first phase of development is known as Eagle Harbor. Eagle Harbor is composed of 1,137 gross acres (with approximately 867 developable acres) and is anticipated to contain 22 ,, different residential subdivisions and approximately 1,600 total units, Approximately 438 acres have been developed to date in Eagle Harbor. Eagle Harbor represents the moior residential portion of the Development; however., fha construction of several shoppm9 areas is also planned within Eagle Harbor. A 125,000 square foot shopping center is now open and anchored by a Publix supermarket. The District projects include improvements to certain existing external roadways, an internal roadway system (including landscaping, irrigation, lighting and bike/pedestrian paths), master drainage systems [including lakes and water control structures for water management), infrastructure required for the development of residential and commercial tracts (including roadways and storm water drainage systems) and the construction of various recreational facilities. External Roads~'a~, I~proven~ents External roadway improvements include lane additions to County Road 220 and US Highway 17 which are being undertaken pursuant to the Development Order for the DRI in order to serve the traffic for the Development. County Rood 220 will be widened from two lanes to four lanes between the US Highway 17 ~ntersection and Swimming Pen Creek and construction ~s currently underway. US Highway 17 is to be w~dened from four lanes to six tones between County Road 220 and Doctor's Inlet. Externat roadway cor~struction includes clearing and grubbing; earthwork; drainage structures: drainage treatment facilities: base materials: pavement structures; curb and gutter; utility relocations; maintenance of traffic; sodding, seeding and mulching; fencing: ~avement marking; s~gnmg; and signalization. Upon completion of the external roadways. County Road 220 will be turned over to and maintained by Cloy County and US Highway 17 will be turned over to and maintained by the Florida Department of Transportation. District Projects 16J Internal road~a¥ IMproveMents tnternaJ roadway improvements include the first phase of construction of Town Center Boulevard South, the construction of Eagle Harbor Parkway North and the first two phases of construction of Eagle Harbor Parkway West. Internal roadway construction includes clearing and grubbing; earthwork; drainage structures; drainage treatment facilities: base materials; pavement structures; curb and gutters; utility relocations: maintenance of traffic: sodding, seeding and mulching; street lighting: electric trunkhnes: sidewalks: trees and shrubbery: pavement marking; signing; s~gnaJJzation; and irrigation. Upon completion of the internal roadways, they wiiJ be turned over to and maintained by Clay County. The District wiJJ own, operate and maintain the ~rrigation system and the landscaping of the collector roads. Mas1 er Drainage SvsleM IMpro~eMen Is The master drainage system includes the storm water collection, treatment and routing system (pond excavation, pond outfa!l structures, littoral ptant~ng and wetland creation). The District will own~ operate and maintain the master drainage systems. Future developers will provide storm water management systems for their individual parcels. Subdivision and CoMMercial Intras'~ ruci ute IMproYeMents Subdivision and commercial infrastructure development constituting the construction of roadways and storm water drainage systems for the residential and commercial tracts within Eagle Harbor, will also be included in Districy proiects. Recrea'~ ional Facili~ ies District projects Include construction of Certain pork and recreattonaJ facihtJes within the District. These facihties include ~mprovemenfs fo a multi- use community focihty featuring o sw~m and tennis complex as welt os the District's headquarters and its community building Other recreational improvements include o waterfront park (with a shelter, peak p~cmc area, boating which ~s necessary to serve the entire.~l~ facility, a pontoon boot, boardwalk and parking Development. The initial project 'will include first~r oreo), four playgrounds bike trail connectors (for phase of development of the master drainage system serving lands within Town Center Master drainage system construction includes trench excavation; pipe; end sections; inlets; storm manhoies with covers; backfill trench and compact neighborhoods not served by the bike path system), and a community boat storage area, Other ~tems include land acquired for a Clay County park and baiJfields for a public school serving the community. District Projects l. andsCaping and ParksvaY Irrigation District projects include landscaping and the irrigation systems relating thereto which wilt be situated along sections of the internal road system and portions of certain recreational areas. Master UtiliTY System The master utihty system includes the sanitary sewer, potable water and treated effluent systems along the main internal roadways ultimately to a point of connection for the water and sewer plants, or other utilities, owned and operated by the Clay County Water and Sewer Authority. The master utihty system also includes treated effluent transmission lines and a holding pond for the proiect's irrigation systems. Sanitary sewer system construchon includes sanitary sewer lift stations, underground electric trunkhnes to serve the hftstotions and pump stations, trench excavation, force main pipe and fittings, valves, PVC sanitary sewer pipe and fittings, trench backfilling, sanitary manholes with covers, pavement removal, pavement patching and iack and boring. Potable water system construction includes trench excavation, PVC potable water pipe and fittings, drilling and tapping, valves, fire hydrants, thrust blocks, trench backfilling, pavement removal, pavement patching, and jack and boring Treated effluent distribuhon system construction includes trench excavation, backfilling, force. ma~n pipe and fittings, valves, pumps and controls, hned holding pond, pavement removal, pavement patching and jack and boring. The treated effluent supply line will run from the county,owned sewage treatment plant to the pond. Treated effluent distribution lines will run from the pond to the golf course, common areas and subdivisions. The District wdJ own and maintain all water and sewer hnes from the point of connection to the end user. : Subdivisions Utilities Infrastruct~,,re The Subdivisions Utilities Infrastructure includes construction of sanitary sewer systems, potable water systems, treated effluent systems and lot services for the residential tracts within the Crossings. Sanitary sewer system, potable water system and treated effluent system construction includes the same components as described for the Master Utility System. Lot services include sanitary sewer, potable water and treated effluent stub outs for each residential building lot. Sanitary sewer stub out construction includes excavation~ PVC pipe fittings, caps and backfill and compact trench. Potable water and treated effluent stub out construction includes excavation drill and tap, corporation saddle, PVC pipe, District Projects 16J 1 fittings, curb stop, curb box and backfill and compact trench. construction with approximately 200 residential units completed, There is also a Fleming Jsiand DRt which is located to the southi contiguous with the Town Center Community of The Crossings. The Fleming Island proiect is planned as a residential development with ancillary commercial, office and light industrial uses. (.Zommerciol, Office and Light industria! ]nfr'aslructure - The commercial, office and light industrial infrastructure includes construction of samtary sewer systems and potable water systems for the commercial, office and light industrial tracts within The Crossings. Sanitary sewer system and potable water system construction includes the same components as described for the master utility system. 0 iher IMproveMents the DRI. Engineering design, planning, surveying, perm~tting, environmental monitoring,. geotechnicaJ work, and construction administration will be required throughout the development process, In addifion, a fire fruck w~tf be acquired by' the District for Cloy County pursuant to the terms of Off-site ,mprovements and land uses have also impacted The Cross,ngs. These improvements include state, county and local roods, residential development and commercial activities. The Pace Development, on approved DRI is situated on The Crossings northern boundary. Pace is currently under LOCATION: ACRES: ESTABLISHED: E. Flagler County 2,100 October 1985 COUNTY: Flagler BONDS ISSUED: DUNES Community Development District $28,880,000 16J DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Water, Sewer and IrrigationTreatment and Distribution and Collection Facilities, V~tter Management, and Bridge. 1 The District Dunes Community Development District was created in October 1985~ The District was created to plan, engineer and construct infrastructure and provide certain services within the District, The District is located in eastern Fiagter County, Florida and consists of approximately 2,100 acres. rules and regulations with respect to any proiects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The District is a community development district organized and existing under the Constitution and lows of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter lc)O and Section ]90.O1,4, Florida Statutes and other apphcabte prows~ons of law (the "Act"). If was esfobhshed on October 1985, pursuant fo the Rules and Regulations of the State of Florida Land and Wafer Adjudicatory Commission. The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Manager, The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and ~s responsible for preserving and maintaining any ~mprovement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operahng the equipment owned by the District and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. DUNES C'ommuni~. Development Dist~qct DisTriCT Projects 16J I' District Proiects consists of three mare facilities: (ii The water, wastewater and irrigation sytems which include treatment facilities, distribution and collection lines and supporting facilities; (ii) The water management facilities which consists of lakes, swales, wetland habitat and drainage systems; (iii) The bridge which consists of toll booth and office facilities, roadway, landscape, earthwork and bridge span, xVaier & Sex, er System The System is part of the ~nfrastructure for the planned community development, The District owns the System and oversees its acquisition, construction, equipping and operation. The System was designed to serve the southern one~ half of the District's territory, which is approximately 1,OO0 acres in size. The Systems consists of (1) a potable water distribution and fire hydrant systems (the "Water System"); (2) a wastewater collection, treatment and disposal systems (the "Sewer System"); and (31 an effluent reuse (irrigation system (the "Effluent System"). ~'AT fR ~VS'Tf M Utility Corporation pursuant to which PCUC ~s subject to regulation by the Florida Public Service commission, which as approved the terms of the Water Agreement. PCUC obtains its water from wells located west of the District and provides water to the District through a 6-~nch master meter service interconnect located at the junction of H~ghway A1A and Jungle Hut Road, Under the Water Agreement, the District has paid for the right to received treated water from PCUC based on an estimated maximum average demand, of 100000 gallons per day. The District paid an 'Advance Capacity Charge" and a ~'Water Facility Tax Impact Charge' of $7t5~000.O0 and $335389.55 respectively for the initial purchase based on the 1OO,OOO gallons per day maximum average demand. The District also pays monthly charges to PCUC The Agreement provides a mechanism for the District to purchase additional capacity upon payment of additional sums to PCUC. Both the ACC and WFTtC for future purchase are subject to adjustment pursuant to the Water Agreement. The monthly and gallonage charges are also subiect to future adjustment. Transmission and Distribution Facilities. The water distribution facilities are located south of Jungle Hut Road and consist of approximately 21,143 linear feet of 8 10, 12 and 16-inch diameter pipes together with valves and fittings. These facilities are designed to provide capacity of 3.5 times average daily demands to approximately 1,332 residential dwelling units plus fire flow of 1,5OO gallons per minute. Individual service, from the above described facihties, to the existing residential units and areas is provided from pipe tess than 8-inches in diameter Water Supply. Because the system has no wells or water treatment plants of its own, potable water is provided to the DUNES dated April 8~ 1088 with Palm Coast Customers. Usage Sales. The Water Systems currently services the southern half residential and non-res~dential customers. Actual usage amounts have Com~nunio, Development District DistricT Projects been in excess of the originally proiected figures and maximum approached 95gOO gallons per day on several days. The Consulting Engineers believe that the additional water use attributable to lawn watering and have proposed an expansion to the effluent reuse/irrigation facJhtJes of the System. The proposed expansions and improvements to the effluent reuse/irrigation facilities are proiected to bring potable water consumption within the originally projected range by making treated effluent available for lawn watering. ~t^STe~¥&T e R sVst EM Collection and Treatment Facilities. Sewage treatment is provided through a 250000 gallons per day wostewater treatment plant. The wastewater treatment plant is located on a 22,49 acre dedicated utility site lust north of Jungle Hut Road and is designed to accommodate 200,000 gallons per day of domestic wastewater plus 50,000 gallons per day of backwash water from sand media fhers~ Current average daily wastewater treatment plant flows are approximately 8,OOO gallons per day. Effluent disposal is provided through irrigation of the Hammock Dunes Golf Course and certain roadway medians~ 750,000 gallons per day of effluent irrigation services, are located at the wastewater treatment plant site. These facilities consist of a 750,000 gallon per day sand media filter and two effluent storage ponds with a combined capacity of 17,OOO, OO0 gallons, The District also owns a 12- inch effluent transmission main which connects the District's and PCUC's wastewater treatment plants. The effluent main ~s utilized to obtain additional effluent from PCUC to supplement the District's effluent for irrigation demands. The primary purpose of the storage ponds is containment of the effluent from the District's wastewater treatment plant and for ~rrJgation effluent from PCUC Pursuant to the Effluent Reuse Agreement, the District makes effluent available to Admiral for golf course and road median irrigation. The wastewater collection facihtJes are located south of Jungle Hut Road and consist of approximately 11,104 hnear feet of 8, 10, and 12- inch diameter gravity sewers, 8 lift stations ranging from 40 to 440 gallons per minute and approximately 14291 linear feet of force mains designed to provide service to approximately 1,332 dwelling units and to accommodate up to 2.,5 times the expected average daily volume. Elfluen~ Reuse Facilities Bridge Project The facilities, The Bridge Project is part of a planned community development, and was financed and constructed under the Act and pursuant to the Development Order of County Commissioners of FlagJer County, Florida, approved March, 30, /984. The District acted as master developer of the Bridge Prelect and both owns the wastewafer disposal/reuse DUNES Bridge Prelect and oversees it operation and maintenance. The planned community development called Hammock Dunes is developed on capable of providing approximately 2,1OO acres of land C)mmmniO, Developmeut District District Projects with*n the district and consists of residential units (single-family, multi-family and condominiums), and related commercial, recreational, resort and other structures. Wa'~er Manage~,~en i Facili~'ies The water management facilities are a series of interconnected swales, Joke and canal systems The Bridge Prelect consists of the two-Jane, high level, fixed bridge across the Atlantic Jntracoastal Waterway, and related access roads and toll facilities and connects Interstate H~ghway c~5 with H~ghway A1A, faohtating access to Hammock Dunes and adlacent areas. There ore two non-toil bridges m the general geographic area which connect Interstate q5 and H,ghwoy A1A, one approximately 10 miles north of the Bridge Proiect. the other approximately 4 miles south of the Bridge Prelect. The Bridge Protect ~s the only bridge between Hammock Dunes and the mainland wNch is not a drawbr,dge subject to traffic flow ,nterruption as a result of boat traffic on the Atlantic lntracoastal Waterway. The Bridge Proiect was opened to general public traffic July 3~ !988 designed to iht,grate and preserve the natural "coastal dune" environment. The drainage system mcorporates this natural element with development criteria and flood control. The water management system consists of pipmg, culverts. storm manholes, excavation, ouffalt structures. littoral plantings and monitoring. DUNES Corn m uni~. Develop men t Dist~'ict LOCATION: Osceola County ACRES: 1,552 ESTABLISHED: 16J March 29, 1994 Community Development District COUNTY: Osceola BONDS ISSUED: $26,420,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Roadwa3% Water, Sewer and Reuse Utilities, Earthwork, Water Management, Roadway Lighting, I~mck~caping & Berms, Parks & Recreation, Wetland Mitigation, Off-Site Improvements. The DisTrict The Enterprise Community Development District (Enterprise CDDI, pursuant fo the provisions of Chapter lc)o,. Florida Statutes, was esfobhshed by rule of the Ftorido Land and Water Adiudicofory Commission March 2c), lC)94. The Enterprise District comprises approximately (::),548 acres within Osceolo County, Florida. The District is contiguous fo the Walt Disney World Resort in central Ftorido. The District is expected to be developed in phases sponmng approximately fifteen years. Each phase is expected to encompass one or more Villages. Phase 1, currently under construction, is for the Celebration Place. The District is o community development district organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section 190.014~ Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of law lthe "Act"}. The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve os o governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors fo adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect fo any proiecfs of the District, and fo enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors fo levy taxes under certain conditions, and fo levy special assessments, and fo charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of o community development district is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facihty constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. District Projects 16J 1 .i The Enterprise District is anticipated to provide for the development of office, medical, retail, theme park, recreational, commercial, and other facilities. The District ~s currently broken down into four villages Celebration Place, Celebration Center, West Village and Workplace. West Village and Workplace are also referred to as Westside Development, Celebration Center Celebration Center will include a commerciaF office mixed land use. At the present time, the land may be developed as a shopping mall and office complex. The mall is anticipated to provide 1.5 milhon square feet of shopping space. An additional 700,000 square feet of office space is Celebration Ptac.f Celebration Place is located directly south of U.S. 192 and east of Interstate 4, Celebration Place may offer approximately 8c~2,000 square feet of office space and c)5,000 square feet of commercial space. In addition, Celebration Place is anticipated to have a medicai center w~th approximately 450000 square feet of medical offices and facilities The development of Celebration Place is scheduled to span the years 1cx~4 through 200}. also planned. Development is scheduled to begin in the year 2005 with complehon in 2007, ~¥Stside I)ex ilopMent Westside Development, consisting of West Village and the Workplace, is located west of Interstate 4, along the proposed World Drive extension. The Wests~de Development ~s expected to include a residential area consisting of 641 single-family residences, 832 multi-family units and a high school. A theme park and light industry is also planned for this area, DistricT Projects 16J 1 Development is slated for 2002 through 2006. The improvements to be constructed by the Districts wilt include, but not necessarily be hmJted to, the following: Primary roadways and bridges Parcel (Village)-specific roads and bridges Street lighting Domestic water distribution system Wastewater/sanitary sewer col/ect~on system Reuse (reclaimed) water distribution system Stormwater management facilities Drainage collection systems Off-site roadways and intersection improvements Wetland compliance Common area development The parcel specific improvements are those public infrastructure improvements specifically related to a g~ven village or land use parcel. Examples of parcel specific improvements include earthwork for a specific village to collect and control stormwater runoff, the distribution of utilities, and c~ssociated primary infrastructure. The street tree program and landscape and irrigation of the parks and areas surrounding the lakes are all part of the parcel specific improvements. The infrastructure for each village consists of roads and bridges, utilities, and site development, as described below. The improvements include the parcel's collector roads and secondary residential streets, roadway hghtJng and custom signage. The improvements include potable water distribution systems,, wastewater/sanitory sewer collechon system, and reuse water distribution system. The improvements include earthwork, stormwater management and drainage collection systems, landscape and irrigation, hardscape, sidewalks, jogging trails nature trails, entry features and parks. The District will be constructing alt paving grading, and drainage systems associated with the roadways. The roadways will consist of a stabilized subgrade, soil cement base and asphaltic concrete surface course, in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared during this phase of development. Signing, pavement markings, guardrails, sidewalks, and traffic signals will also be constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared during this phase, Di$1RJcT PROJECTS The designs have been prepared ~n accordance with the current State of Florida Manual of Minimum ,Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance of Streets and Highways, Osceola County Road Construction Specifications, AASHTO policies, and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The purpose of the Enterprise Stormwater Master Plan is to assure that adequate stormwater management facilities are available to meet the regulatory requirements of the protect. The Enterprise Stormwater Master Plan identifies peak discharge rates, water quality requirements, 100 year floodplain elevations, groundwater flows. The proposed stormwater drainage system for the District wilt be reviewed by ROD, SFWMD and Osceota County prior fo construction. The drainage system wilt be consistent with the Enterprise Stormwater Master Plan and maintain existing drainage patterns to the greatest extent possible. Jn order to facilitate development Enterprise proiect, it will be necessary fo relocate the existing 18" h~gh pressure gas transmission main owned and operated by ENRON Gas Pipeline Operating Co., and the high voltage overhead electric service lines owned of the by Florida Power Company tFPC) and the Orlando Utilities Commission (OUC.) Common oreo development as if relates to that portion of the primary infrastructure generally includes the following: Common area development for the right-of-ways of primary roadways including: landscaping, irrigation system including controls, piping, and heads; and transit stops. The road related utilities include the underground duct bank system necessary to support the street lighting and signalization within the proiect. General infrastructure may be described as those elements of design and engineering that ore necessary to support the primary infrastructure work and the parcel development ,work Examples of elements of general infrastructure include work such os conceptual engineering, scheduhng, piezometer installation and monitoring, preliminary and final topographic surveys, and other miscellaneous professional services. Construction of the primary infrastructure ~mprovements identified as water, sewer and effluent reuse, will be completed by the Enterpmse CDD and provided to the Celebration CDD through an intertocal agreement. The water, sewer and effluent reuse will be supplied to the Enterprise CDD by the City of Kissimmee. The potable water infrastructure mains range m size from 6' through 24" in diameter. All new water moms wilt meet the design criteria set forth in the D~stricts Permit Criteria Manual and will include the appurtenant fittings, valves, and valve boxes to effect serwce to properties contiguous to the roadways. District Projects 16J II A central wastewater collection system will be installed within the roadways. The system will include a ser,es of manifolded pump stations. Each pump station will collect the raw wastewater within its service area (generally a specific village to 20" in diameter, The system will include appurtenant valves, fittings and meters to deliver reclaimed water at the connection point of each village to the primary infrastructure at a pressure of 50 psi. or portion thereof), The primary infrastructure includes forcemains, ranging in size from though 20~', and pump stations, as well as the appurtenant fittings, valves, and flow meters required to connect the primary infrastructure to the City's wastewoter system. The reclaimed water system will deliver reclaimed water from the City of Kiss~mmee facility to the Districts and its villages via a looped distribution system located within the roadways. The reclaimed water main piping system includes pipes, ranging ~n size from 8" With the development of the Enterprise community, certain public roadways located outside of the district boundaries will require upgrades. The off-site road etement apportions these external roadways ~mprovements to each District, There are several roadways directiy adjacent to or bisecting the two Distr~cts for which landscape and hardscape ~mprovements are being planned. Services District LOCATION: E. Central I~e County ACRES: 5324 ESTABLISHED: May 22, 1986 COUNTY: Lee BONDS ISSUED: $24,780,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Water, Sewer and Irrigation Facilities, Earthwork, Water Management, Roadway Lighting, Landscaping & Berms, Recreation, Parks & Security, xX;k-tland Mitigation, OffLSite Improvements. The DisTriCT The District is located in the east-central portion of Lee County, Florida. It is bounded on the north by State Road 82 and Colonial Boulevard, on fha west by Six Mite Cypress Parkway, on the south by Southwest Florida International Airport and on the east by currently vacant agricultural land. The D~str~ct consists of approximately ,5,324 acres. The District ~s a community development district organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section 190.0t4, Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of law (the "Act3. It was established on May 22, 1986, pursuant to the Rules and Regulations of the State of Florida Land and Water Adiudicatory Commission [he Act provides for o five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the District The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect to any proiects of the District, and fo enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors fo levy taxes under certain conditions, and to Jew special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facihtJes. The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Manager, The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the Distr<t and ~s responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duttes os may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District District ProjecTs 16J 1 Gateway (the "Development") is a residential and commercial community located within and without the city limits of Fort Myers in Lee County, Florida. The Development is located on approximately 5,431 acres directly north of Southwest Florida International Airport, with access to Interstate 75 from Colonial Boulevard and State Road 82 to the north and Daniels Parkway to the south. The Development is approximately 2.5 hours driving time south of Tampa and approximately 25 minutes driving time north of Naples. In 1982, the Developer purchased 1,5OO acres comprising the Development, with the remaimng acreage purchased over the ensuing twelve years. Through February 28, 1995, the Developer purchased 3,581 of the total acres within the Development and has under option the remaining 1,850 acres, The Development qualified under Florida State law as a Development of Regional Impact in 1985. Originally, all lands within the Development were located outside the boundaries of the City of Fort Myers (the "City"), thereby placing the responsibility of Lee County (the "Count/'). Subsequently, the Developer agreed with the City ~ to beg~n annexation of ~£I'~j[l~ approximately 2,100 acres of undeveloped land within the Development into the City beginning m 1993. To date, approximately 1,8OO of these acres have been annexed. The current development plan calls for 4,356 single-family homes, 900 single-family attached units, 3,600 multirfamily units, approximately 900,000 square feet of general warehouse space, approximately 3.6 million square feet of office space and approximately 1.5 milhon square feet of retail and commercial space. Development of Gateway commenced in 1986, with the first homesite sold in 1988. Upon buildouk the Development is proiected to include a residential population of approximately 20,000 residents, residen rial Development The residential portion of the Development is currently marketed as a fomily,-orienfed, master, planned golf course community, offering a variety of home products (including single-family homes, condominiums and villas) with prices ranging from $90,000 to over $600,000 In 1994, the Development was named Lee County's Community of the Year by the Sales and Marketing Council of the Lee District Projects 16J 1 County Building and Industry Association. will be taking occupancy in March lC)qO, wilt hire 450 new employees with expansion plans for up to 600 people. recreational Facilities A variety of recreohonal facilities are located within the Development, including the following: Oateway Gait and Country Cu~ The Gateway Golf and Country Club features an 18 hole championship golf course designed by Tom Faz~o, as welt as a driving range, putting green, four Hat tru tennis courts and two day tennis courts, The 8,000 square foot clubhouse also features locker rooms, card room, dining in the Griffin Room or Members Room and a pro shop. CoMMercial Devtlop~,~ext The Development includes five separate office parks, with six general office buildings completed Towne Lake Park, designed for light manufacturing, warehouse and flex space, ,ncJudes Sussex Semi Conductors inc. which moved its headquarters from Branchville. New Jersey to the Development in 1992. Fairway Lakes, a t5 acre off~ce park fronting the golf course. includes an eight building complex that opened ~n lq92. WestJmks Business Park comprises fifty seven (57) divided acres currently designed for offices light industrial and manufacturing, distribuhon, retail and hotel. Towne Center Market and The Shoppes at Gateway offer 'etad space. Compames and businesses that have located wtthin the Development include among others, Ford Motor Credit Corporahon Owen Ames Kimball Construchon Co.. Shaw Aero Devices, Inc., T~tle~st Testing Center Nahonal Electronics, Allstate Insurance Company, Barnett Bank, Baader, Southwest Mad, and the Girl Scouts of America. Currently under construction is a 68,000 square foot facility for Sony Electric Corporation. Sony, which Gateway' Commons This 15 acre park site, owned and operated by the District, within the Development features a swimming pool, kiddy pool and restroom facilities. Plans are underway for a sports field, tennis courts and pavilion. Gateway Fun Park This park includes a playground, basketball court, volteyba!J court, p<mc areas, and barbecue facilities. Educational FaciliTies Gateway Magnet Elementary School, owned and operated by the Lee County School Board, ~s located on the eastern boundary of the Development. Students are accepted by' lottery drawing. The 860 student school must meet County requirements for minority and non minority ratios. nte np. U'! iIi 1 irs All residents within the Development receive water serv<e from the District. The District has entered into a 20 year agreement to purchase bulk potable water from Lee County Utilities, which agreement requires District Projects 16J the County to supply water to the District in accordance with development needs. A gravity sewer collection system to serwce all developed areas within the Development is maintained by the District, Treated effluent is permitted to be reused for irrigation purposes and ~s added to the DistricFs ~rrigation storage facilities. The District provides ~rrJgafion to lands within the Development, The District provides water management to all lands within the District through the construction, operation and maintenance of a system of waterways, bermsf culverts, weirs and lakes integrated with natural seasonal ponds and cypressheads. partnership in which the Developer holds a c)5 percent interest. Within the DeveJopmenk service is obligatory for all residential property as the Development ~s subiect to a bulk rate agreement with the provider of cable service Jones Intercabte is the operating and maintenance entity for the cable system, while the Developer provides all capitol for installed systems within the Development. Power is provided by Florida Power and Light Company v~a underground lines that have been installed. Phone service is provided to residents of the Development by United Telephone Company of Florida. Cable service is provided by Jones ]ntercable, a ioint venture LOCATION: W. Broward Counu, INDIAN'TRACE Community L)evelopment District 16J I ACRES: ] 3,000 ESTABLISHED: 1981 August 1975 re-established July COUNTY: Broward BONDS ISSUED: $265,510,00o DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Roadways, ~X~ter, Sewer Utilities, Earthwork, Water M~magernent, and Wetland Mitigation. The DisTriCT The District was created as the Indian Trace Special Municipal Tax District on August 18, 197,5 by Ordinance 75-22 adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Broward County, Florida. In July 1981, the District was re- established as a community development district under the Act pursuant to Rule 42A-1,. Florida Administrative Code, of the Florida Land and Water Adiudicotory Commission. The Act was enacted in 1~80 to provide a uniform method for building commumty developments. The District is a community development district organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 1gO and Section 190.014, Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of law (the The Act provides for a five member Board of Superwsors to serve os a governing body of the D~strict. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulahons with respect to any projects of the District, and fo enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy foxes under certain conditions and fo levy special assessments, and fo charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facJhties. The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Managec The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and ~s responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the prows~ons of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. INDIA. N'PRACE Community Developme.! Distric~ District Projects The District is bcoted in the southwestern portion of Broward County, Florida, and its boundaries include on the north interstate 595 and Interstate 75, on the west U.S, Highway 2Z on the south Canal C 1t and on the east Dike Road. The District consists of oppro×imotely 13000 acres which, for water management purposes, Js diwded into two geographic subdivisions or drainage basins ("Basin I' and "Basin Il"). Basin 1 encompasses the largest portion of land within the District, comprised of approximately c~,qOO acres. Basin It is comprised of approximately 3,1OO acres Each Basin has its own independent drainage system which corresponds to the intensity of development which has token, and is anticipated to take, place within the respective Basin The purpose of the Water Management Plan is to construct o system of waterways, roads, bridges and structures to provide effective water management control and to provide road access within the District. The facilities to be provided will protect against flooding of Iow lands through a system of water control, water storage, water conservation and storm drainage permitting the beneficial use of the property for residential, industrial and recreational development. The controlling design factors in the system are: (1) The adopted hydrologic design criteria. (2)The degree of flooding protection to be provided. (3) The amount of water conservation and water resource protection to be provided by the District. The major roadways to be built by the District will be constructed according to the standards of Broward County. Road embankment and base material will be obtained from on-s~te excavation. Roadway drainage will be primarily through roadside swales designed with a mimmum number of inlets and piping. All other roadways of the District will be constructed by the landowners at the,r expense. INDIAN'TRACE Community Development District The proposed internal and external rood system is planned to mimmize any adverse impact the proposed development might have on any potential adjacent development over the next twenty years. The District ~s currently served on the north by State Road 84 and 1-75. Its southern area will be served by the proposed four- lane Griffin Road. The east side wilt be District Projects 16J 1 served by 1-75 and the west by the four-lane U.S. 27. The District's water management system is currently divided rote two separate drainage basins: Basin I end Basin II. Basin I encompasses the largest portion of land within the District, comprised of approximately 9,914 acres. Basin is also known as The Weston Community, a substantial portion of which ~s currently being developed by Arvida/JMB Partners. Basin It is comprised of approximately 3.101 acres of land, is agricultural in nature and there ore approximately ]00 separate owners within Basin The Weston Development is a master planned, residential community comprised of approximately 9,9]4 acres and is located approximately ]5 miles west of Fort Lauderdole, Fiorido. Interstate 75 connects the Development with The City of Miami, Florida, located approximately th,rtyffive miles south of Fort Lauderdate, The row land elevation in the Weston Development averaging approximately four and one- half feet. Such land must be raised to approximately seven feet to provide for future development, and ~n addition, must be demucked and filled. The demucbng and filling process includes the blasting and excavating of lakes, which serve as the water management source and as fill material for the land. The Development of Regional Impact approval has been obtained for the remaining acreage in the Weston Development. Certain infrastructure such as roads, lakes and water management systems, are now in place or under construction in the Weston Development. The Primary Developer anticipates that completion of the Weston Development which will include substantial land sales to and building activity by third parties ~,,,'iJl take place over approximately the next twenty years, Approximately 7500 acres within the Weston Development hove been zoned for residential commercial and light industrial uses. All of the industrial land and a majority of the office and commercial land within the Development~ a total of oppro×imateJy !000 acres, is owned by third party developers The present approved master plan provides for the construction and sole of housing and for the development of homesffes, relatively iow, ]r~[j2[.,~"~CE commercial and industrial properties Community Development District DisTriCT Projects 16J 1 and recreational amenities, including golf courses, swimming facihties~ tennis courts, outdoor band offering product lines to meet the needs of a wide range of home buyers. The Primary Developer has built product lines within the Weston Development that include patio homes, village homes and garden homes and has developed homesite programs with participating outside builders. Through on agreement with the City of Sunrise, in Broward County, the District's drinking water is treated and pumped to a District storage facility located within Weston. This water is then shells, soccer and baseball fields, nature and archaeological park focihties and equestrian facilities, much of which has been completed or ~s now underway. In addition, the development includes public school sites ranging from elementary to m~ddle school to high school and their related facilities, and includes venous church sites. A commercial center complex, which contains an information center for the Primary Developer, a restaurant and a village store, has been completed. The sale of single family homes within the Weston Development began ,n 1985 and the Primary Developer has continued to develop such products to date, i~.rr~[f2~r~rl,~,r21/,~r~. ComrnuniO' Developmettt I)istrict repumped through the District's water distribution system to all residential and commercial users. The treatment and disposal of wastewater is also provided by the City of Sunrise, ~n accordance with regulatory standards. However, wastewater collection, pumping, and transmission facilities are operated and maintained by the District. LOCATION: Indigo Community Development District Daytona Beach, Florida 16J. I ACRES: 2,480 ESTABLISHED: January 5, 1995 COUNTY: ¥~)lusia BONDS ISSUED: Pending DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Photo Not Available Roadways, Water, Wastewater & Reuse Facilities, Water Management. Roadway Lighting, Landscaping, Open Space & Recreational Facilities. The DisTrict The Indigo Community Development District (District) is located in the City of Daytona Beach, Florida and consists of approximately 2,480 acres of land proposed to be developed for residential, commercial, and public uses. The proposed development has been approved by the City of Daytona Beach as a development of regional ~mpact (LP©A DRI).The District was established on January 5, 1995. The District is a community development district organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section 190014, Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of iow (the 'Act"). The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect to any proiects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such ruies and ragu!arians, The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge~ collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of a community development distr~ct is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and ~s responsible for preserving and maintaining any ~mprovement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act for maintaining and operating fha equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties os may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District~ District Projects 16J 11 The Indigo Community Development District consists of approximately 2,480 acres Jn the City of Daytona Beach, Florida, The lands are mostly undeveloped, The District may assist in providing and maintaining certain infrastructure necessary for the development of lands within the District, consistent with the approved Development of Regional Impact (LPOA DRI) from the City of Daytona Beach. The descriptions of infrastructure improvements anticipated that the District may provide is as fotJows: A, ,Surface water management system B. Roads, street hghting and culverts C, Water, wastewater, & reuse facihties D, Landscaping of nine (9) entrances and roadway landscaping E, Open Space and Recreational facilities The Petition to establish the District (Petition) identified a number of improvements which may be provided by the District. These included a potable water distribution, wastewater collection,, and reuse system, and a roadway system. Capital costs of these improvements may be borne by the District. Once complete, these improvements would be dedicated to the City of Daytona Beach and the ownership and operation of these improvements would then be the responsibility of the City. The City would be responsible for ail maintenance of these improvements except as to the roadway landscape maintenance to be performed by the District. The Petition also noted the intent fo hove the District construct a street lighting system which may include having the franchisee install and maintain lights. The capital costs of the street lighting system may be borne by the District. Once complete, portions of this system may be dedicated to the City of Daytona Beach and the ownership, operation and maintenance of those portions would be the responsibility of the City. The remoimng portions of the street lighting system would be owned operated and maintained by the District. Finally, the Petition also explained that the District may participate in the enhancement and maintenance of landscaping at the proposed LPOA Boulevard and t,-95 Interchange, Maintenance of the water management system and facilities is presently expected to be divided between the District and the City. Compliance with applicable water quality standards for the water management facilities (e.g. lakes and ponds) within the District is expected to be performed by the District. It is presently intended that the water quality maintenance cost of the lakes within the municipal golf course which abut common areas or individual lots which function as part of the drainage system for the District will be :shared with the City on a pro rata basis. The costs of water quality maintenance for those lakes wholly within the municipal golf course will be borne by the City. LOCATION: S.E. Collier Count' ACRES: 174 ESTABLISHED: Jun,: 30, 1992 COUNTY: Collier BONDS ISSUED: $14,460,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Water Management, Roadways & Bridges, Stree~ I,ighting, I,andscape, Water, Sewer and Irrigation Facilities. The District The District encompasses approximately t74 acres of land in Colher County, Fiorida. ]-he District is bounded on the north by State Road 92. on the south by Caxambas Pass. on the east by Blue Hill Creek and an the west by BarfleJd Bay. The District ~s an independent unit of local government established in accordance with the Constitution and Jaws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 1gO and Section 190.014 Florida Statutes and other applicable provis~ons of law (the "Act") by ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of the County adopted on June 30 1992. The project is part of a larger area defined in a Settlement Agreement between the Deltono Corporation and federal state and county authorihes and various conservation groups. The Key Marco Commumty Development District (D~strict) has been established within the w-; development fo prowde construction and quality long term care for the development ~1~ facilities, The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect to any proiects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations, The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain con&tions, and to levy special assessments and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities, The chief administrative official of o community development &strict ~s the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and superwsion of the works of the District and is responsible for preserwng and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the of the Act, for provisions maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the D~strict, and for performing such duties os may be prescmbed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. District Projects 16J Key Marco is a 174 acre planned community development located east of Marco Island in Collier County. The project is part of a larger area defined in a Settlement Agreement between the DeJtona Corporation and federal, state and county authorities and various conservation groups. The Settlement Agreement provides for development of areas defined in the Agreement of which Harts Island (Key Marco) is a part. The Key Marco Community Development District (District) has been established within the development to provide construction and quality long term care for the development facilities. The District is bounded on the north by SR 92, on the south by Caxambas Pass, on the west by Barfield Bay and on the east by Blue Hill Creek. Key Marco is located east of Marco Island, The terrain is rolling with elevations within the District ranging from elevation 3 to 38 NGVD. The community ~s served by entry from SR 92. A roadway will be constructed on the mainland to a bridge which will cross Blue Hill Creek. The roadway network wilt then continue throughout the remainder of the proiect. The ~ project water management system will consist of roadside swales with discharge to surrounding tidal waters. The District Projects consists of four basic infrastructure improvements; a water management system; roadways (including drainage, landscaping and lighting); walkways, water, sewer, and Jrrigahon facilities; and a bridge. These improvements are comprised of (t) the water system, which includes a pumphouse and storage tank, (iJt a sanitary system, which is a Iow pressure forcemaJn line and two pump stations, (iii) a drainage system with overflow berms, (iv) roadway irrigation running the length of the roadway, (v} a bridge, approximately 530 feet long, which connects mainland Barfietd Bay with Horr's Island. (vi) streetlights, running the total length of the roadway, (vjj) a front entry statement, which includes the front entry guardhouse and landscaping, (viii) road landscaping, which primarily includes sod and minor accent landscaping, and (ix) earthwork for the bridge approach, surcharge and roadway design. The District will own and operate/maintain the water management system irrigation system, sewer collection system, roadways, bridge, and landscaping portion of the roadway system. District Projects 16J Water will be provided by the Collier County Water-.Sewer District through a bulk service Left: Resider~ce agreement with Southern States Utilities. An 8 inch main currently runs along SR 92 and wilt be the source of both potable water and fire protection The water system within Key Marco will be interconnected throughout the project to provide adequate potable water and fire service, Sewer service will be provided by the District through a bulk service agreement with Southern States Utihties. Two master pump stations and a Iow pressure pump system will be constructed throughout the project to serve individual residents and amenity areas. The master pump station by SR 92 will then pump to on existing 8 inch force ma~n tocated along SR 92 which then runs to the wastewater treatment plant located on Marco Island Belo~w The Dock,v~steR Slips LOCATION: ACRES: $]5 ESTABLISHED: Lakewood Ranch (]ommunit3, Development District 1 M~matce Count3, February 25, 1994 COUNTY: Manatee BONDS ISSUED: $10,005,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: X,Vater/Wastewater/Irrigation Distribution and Collection Facilities, P, oadways, Streetlighting, 1.andscape, Water Management, and Parks and Recreational Facilities. The DistricT The District is a local unit of special-purpose government organized and existing as a commumty development district under the Act. It was created effective February 25, 1994, by Ordinance 94--07 enacted by the Manatee County Board of County Commissioners upon the petition of the Developer, with the permission of the owners of 100% of the lands within the District. The District encompasses approximately 815 acres of land located in the County. Lakewood Ranch is a 4,143 acre prolect in Manatee County, Florida. Lakewood Ranch consists of two previously approved Developments of Regional Impact (DRI), namely Cypress Banks and University Lakes. Cypress Banks is a 1,7g0 acre planned mixed use development located east of F7 and south of S,R. 70. University Lakes, a 2,353 acre mixed use, proiect ties south of Cypress Banks and north of University Parkway. Within Lakewood Ranch (specifically the northwest one-third), Lake wood Ranch Community Development District One was created. The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect to any proiects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of a community development district ~s the District Manager, The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the D~strict, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. District Projects Basically, the District encompasses the northwest one-third of Cypress Banks and consists of approximately 815 acres of residential and commercial properties, A small portion of the District lies within University Lakes. The District is bounded on the south and east by the Braden River and Upper Manatee River Road, on the north by SR 70 and on the west by the River Club development. Lake wood Ranch Community Development D~strict One is located south of SR 70 approximately two miles east of I-7,5. The terrain is gently rolling, with elevations within the District ranging from elevation t0 to 35 NC~VD. Soils generally consists of fine sands typical for Manatee County, C~round water generally is located one to two feet below natural grade during the rainy season. Annual fluctuations may reach five feet. The project is drained by the Braden River, with Wolf Slough and 12 unnamed tributaries discharging into the r~ver. A ser~es of lakes and control structures are planned to control stormwater discharge, ,Southwest Florida Water Management District design criteria will be utilized for design of all water management facilities within the District. The District is proposed to be served by entry from five malor road access points, of which one is within the D~stnct. The proiect has entry from SR 70 to the north which is the entry within the District. District roads also connect to an adjacent prelect known as River Club Four additional proposed entry points not in the District ore off University Parkway to the south ttwo locations), one from SR 70 and one from Lorraine Road to the east, Water will be provided by the Manatee County Public Utilities Department. A 36 inch main currently runs along SR 70. District Projects Manatee County is currently planning a 36 inch line which will run through the project southward to University Parkway. Potable service will be systems will be constructed throughout the prelect to serve individual developments. These pump stations will then pump through a force mare provided from this hne w~th several connection points within the development. Sewer servtce wdl also be provided by the Manatee County Public Utilities Division. A master pump station which will serve the entire development will be constructed. Pump stahons and gravity system to the master pump station. Wastewater will then be pumped from the master pump station through an offsite force main to the Southeast Wastewater Treatment Plar~t. Improvements for the District will consist of a drainage system, roadways (including landscaping and lighting), water management (ke~ lakes, control structures, etc.), recreation (J,e~ nature trail, parks), water~ sewer and irrigation facilities. Of these facilities, the District will owr~ and operate/maintain the water management system, irrigation system, and lighting and landscaping portions of the roadway system. Water and sewer will be dedicated to Manatee County Pubhc Utilities Division. Roads will be maintained by Manatee County, Lakewood Ranch Community Development District 2 LOCATION: Manatee County ACRES: 2,081 ESTABLISHED: May 23, 1995 COUNTY: Manatee BONDS ISSUED: $20,255,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: 16J Water/Wastewater/Irrigation Distribution and Collection Facilities, Roadways, Streetlighting, Landscape, Water Management, and Parks and Recreational Facilities, The District The District is a local unit of special-purpose government organized and existing as a community development district under the Act. The District was established fo finance, plan, acquire, construct and install or fund the infrastructure necessary fo develop Edgewafer and Lokewood Country Club, two of the communities within the Development. it was created by Rule 42W-1,OO1- 1.OO3 adopted by the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission on May 23 1995. The District encompasses approximately 2,O81 acres of land located in the County. I. akewood Ranch consists of two previously approved Developments of Regional Impact (DRI), namely Cypress Banks and University Lakes. Cypress Banks is a t,700-acre planned mixed-use development located east of 1-75 and south of S.R. 70. University Lakes, a 2,353-acre mixed-use project, lies south of Cypress Banks and north of University Parkway. Within Lokewood Ranch (specifically the south half), Lakewood Ranch Community Development District 2 {District} was created The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve os a governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt odmJnistrotive rules and regulations w~th respect to any protects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, arid to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facihhes. The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Manager, The Act provides that the District .Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any ~mprovement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the prows~ons of the AcL for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District and for performing "'~ such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. DisTrict ProjecTs 1GJ li Basically, the District encompasses the southern half of University Lakes and consists of approximately 2,081 acres of residential and commercial properties. A small portion of the District lies within Cypress Banks. The District is bounded on the south by University Parkway, on the east by Lorraine Road on the north by the Braden River and vacant land, and on the west by Upper Manatee River Road. The District is located north of University Parkway approximately two miles east of J-75. The terrain is gently rolling, with elevations within the District ranging from elevation i7 to 50 NGVD. Soils generally consists of fine sands typical for Manatee County. C~roundwater generally is located one to two feet below natural grade during the rainy season. Annual fluctuations may reach four to five feet. The project is drained by Cooper Creek. A series of takes and control structures are planned to control stormwater discharge. Southwest Florida Water Management District design criteria will be utilized for design of all water management facilities within the District, The District is proposed to be served by entry from at least six maior road access points. The District has entry from University Parkway at three locations, from Lorraine Road at one location, and from Upper Manatee River Road at two Iocations~ Additional entries may provide access to individual parcels. Water will be provided by the Manatee County Public Utilities Department. A 36- inch main is under construction along Upper Manatee River Road. Potable service will be provided from this tine with District Projects 16J 1 several connection points within the development. Sewer service will also be provided by the main to the Southeast Wastewater Treatment Plant. /V~anotee County Public Utilities Division. A master pump station, which will serve the District, will be constructed. Pump stations and gravity systems will be constructed throughout the project to serve individual developments, These pump stations will then pump through a force main system to the master pump station, Wastewater will then be pumped from the master pump station through an off-site force Improvements for the District will consist of a drainage system, roadways (including landscaping and I~ghting), water management (i.e, lakes control structures etc.), recreation (i.e. nature trail parks), water sewer and irrigation facilities. Of these facilities, the District wijj own and operate/maintain the water management system. irrigation system, and lighting and landscaping portions of the roadway system Water and sewer wiJJ be dedicated to Manatee County Public Utilities Diws~on. Maior arterial roads will be maintained by Manatee County, however, other roads may be maintained by the District if not dedicated to the county· IIII OVEROAI S Community Development District LOCATION: N, Osc¢ola County ACRES: 913 ESTABLISHED: December 17, ] 990 COUNTY: Osceola BONDS ISSUED: Pending DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: 16J Roadways, Utilities, Earthwork, ~4~ter Management, Roadway Lighting, L~ndscaping & Berms, Wetland Mitigation. I I II Illl II I Ill Ill Ill I ! I Il II IIllllll! Ill The DisTriCT The District encompasses approximately Q]3 acres ~n Osceola County, Florida and was established by ordinance of the Osceola County Board of County Commissioners. The District is located approximately one mite south of downtown KissJmmee and approximately six miles south of the city limits of Orlando. The District is a community development district organized and existing under the Constitution and Jaws of the State of Florida particularly Chapter 190 and Section 1c)o.0t4~ Fiorida Statutes and other apphcable provis,ons of law (the "Act"). It was established on December 1Z lg90 by ordinance of the Osceo!a County Board of County Commissioners. The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations w~th respect to any protects of the -'District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions., and to tevy special assessments, and to charge collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facihtJes. The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District A/~anager. The Act provides that the District A,~anager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the prov~sions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Superv,sors of the District. District Projects The Overoaks Community Development District (District) is a 913 acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) located in Osceola County, Florida. A Development Order has been issued for The Overoaks Development. This order along with the approved DRI provided for the development of a residential golf course community. Construction for this project began nearly 10 years ago with the construction of the 18 hole golf course, and a portion of the infrastructure for the residential areas. infrastructure ~mprovemenfs within the District are to be constructed in three (3) phases; Phase lA, Phase 1 B, and Phase 2. Improvements proposed for the Project, which wilt be constructed by the Distr~ct will include the following: 1. Modification of the existing surface water system including Iokes~ culverts, and control structures, 2. Wetland Mitigation. 3, Intersection Improvements at S.R. 17-92 and The Oaks Blvd. 4. Utihty Improvements including water mains, reuse mains on-site lift station and gravity sewer collection system. 5..Site infrastructure ~mprovements for the residential development, 6. Landscaping and street lighting. Approved land uses within the District consist of both single family and multifamily residential, open space and conservation. The development has been approved by OsceoJa County for a maximum of 991 dwelling units. Phase lA construction shall include (1) site infrastructure improvements to serve the first 307 single-family residential dwelling units and the 200 multi-family residenhot units i2) the construction of outfall control structures for the master stormwater drainage system (3) regrading of an existing by-pass ditch and (4) wetland mitigation. Additionally Phase lA utility facility construction shall include refurbishing two existing on-site lift stations and the construction of a reuse water main and services as required by the City of Kissimmee. Finally, Phase !A construction will include intersection improvements at S,R. 17-g2 along with landscaping, entry wall and street lighting. Phase lB construction wdt included: (1)the excavation of o surface water management lake, interconnecting culverts and discharge control structures. (2) site infrastructure to accommodate 414 single-family residential units and (3) additional intersechon ~mprovements. Additionally, Phase ] B utility facility construction shall include an on-site lift station and forcemain along w~th the extension of the on-site water mains and reuse ma~ns. Finally, Phase ]B construction will include street landscaping, street lighting and associated improvements Phase 2 construction wilt include: the construction of the infrastructure fo serve 70 single-- famdy residential units (2} surface water management system including lakes, connecting culverts and outfalt control structures (3) extension of the on-'site water, sewer and reuse mains and (4) street lighting, street District Projects 16d landscaping and associated improvements. Modification of Existing Surface Water Management System - The District will construct an additional lake, perform m~nor regrading of the existing stormwater ponds, upsJze and Jnstatl several interconnecting culverts and outfalt control structures. Also, reconstruct an existing by pass ditch along the southwest property line, These along with the preserved wetland wilt constitute the master stormwater management facihties for the D~strict. The District's stormwater management facilities will be designed to conform to the Osceola County and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) criteria for the Lake Tohopekahga basin. Wetland Mitigation - The Master Land Use Plan was developed to minimize wetland impacts. However~ minor impacts to the wetlands are anticipated. Mitigation for these impacts will be provided by the preservation of an existing on-site wetland marsh. Intersection Improvements The District will construct the following: (t) an acceleration lane on S.R 17~(~2 beginning at The Oaks Boulevard, (2) the second lane of a dual left turn lane from S.R. t7-c~2 on to The Oaks Boulevard. and (3) a left turn lane from The Oaks Boulevard on to S.R. 17-g2, in addition a traffic signal will be installed at the S.R. 17-92 and The Oaks Boulevard intersection, All intersection improvements will be constructed m accordance with OsceoJa County and the Florida Department of Transportation (F DOT) latest standards. Utility Improvements - The District will construct a master utility system designed to provide central wastewater, potable water, and reuse water systems for each and every residential unit within the District. Work to be completed with the central wastewater system includes connection to the existing gravity sewer and construction of additional gravity sewer lines, tn addition 2 existing on-site lift stations will need to be refurbished and 1 on-site lift station w'ilJ need to be constructed. A maiority of the potable water lines are currently in place. Services for individual lots will need to be connected to the existing water line. Construction of the potable water distribution system wJJl include the various size water mains along with fire hydrants as required to provide adequate fire flow protection in accordance with Osceola County standards. Work to be completed with the construction of the reuse main wjJJ include the various sized mains to provide adequate irrigation throughout the District. All of the utility systems will be designed Jn accordance with City of Kissimmee, OsceoJa County and FDEP current regulations. Site Infrastructure Improvements for the Development Parcels - The District will construct the site infrastructure improvements necessary for the development of the residential parcels within the District. Work to be completed includes the clearing and fine grading of the development parcels, construction of the stormwater management system and construction of the roadways, utility and drainage ~mprovements, Ali improvements associated with the development parcels shall be designed and constructed in accordance with current Osceola County and SFWMD standards. Landscaping and Street Lighting ~ The District wilt provide landscaping and street lighting throughout the district which will at a minimum meet current OsceoJa County standards, LOCATION: ACRES: ESTABLISHED: Community Development District N.W. Collier County 2,075 November 23, 1993 COUNTY: Collier 16J BONDS ISSUED: $14,720,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Roadways, Utilities, Earthwork, kX,~ter Management, Roadway Lighting, Landscaping &: Bcrms, Recreation, Parlcs & Security; Wetland Mitigation, Off-Site Improvements. lhe DistricT The District is located in the metropolitan Naples ore of Collier County, Florida. It was established to provide pubhc ~mprovements and to dehver community development services in the oreo of the District thereby providing a solution fo the County's planning, management and financing needs for delivery of capital infrastructure within that portion of Collier County encompassed by the District. The District is a community development district organized and exishng under the Constitution and taws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section 190014 Florida Statutes (1993) and other apphcoble provisions of law (the "Act"). tt was established on November 23 1993, pursuant to the Rules and Regulations of the State of Florida Land and Water Adiudicatory Commiss;on. respect fo any prelects of the District, and fo enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulohons. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors fo levy taxes under certain conditions, and fo levy special assessments, and fo charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District focihties. The chief administrative official of o community development district is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserwng and momtaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the prowsmns of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District and for performmg such duties os may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve os o govermng body of the D~strict, The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with District ProjecTs 1 1 The District is located within the Cocohatchee River watershed. Existing runoff from the District flows overland to the Pine Ridge and Airport Road Canals. The canals discharge into the Cocohatchee River and have existing hydraulic capacity to serve the proposed drainage needs of the District. 'The District is located within the franchise areas of Florida Power and bght, United Telephone Services, and Colony Cablevision. These utilities wilt provide electrical power, telephone service, and television cable to the District. PROPOSED DISTRICT INFRASTRUCTURE The District infrastructure will generally consist of the following: Roadways Utilities Earthwork Water Management Roadway lighting Landscaping Recreation~ parks and security Wetland mitigation Off,~site impacts The above infrastructure is separated into primary and secondary facilities for assessment purposes, The primary infrastructure are those which serve the District as a whole and equally benefit each user of the District. The secondary infrastructure are those which serve only a specific area within the District (]nd benefit only those users within that specific area. road~,avs The roadways within the District wilt consist of 2-tane undividedf 2-lane divided, and 4dane divided sections. The roadways wJH serve the various land uses within the District and wilt connect to exishng public roadways which border the District. The roadways will be constructed within platted rights-of- way. It is currently estimated that 23 miles of roadway will be constructed. Construction of the roadways wilt consist of subgrade., hmerock base, asphalt, curbing, sidewalks~ signing, and striping. The roadways wilt also include landscaping and lighting which are described in subsequent sections. The roadways will be designed and constructed Jn accordance with Collier County Transportation Standards, Utililies The utilities within the District will consist of water, wastewater and irrigation systems. The water, wastewater and irrigation systems wilt be designed and constructed in accordance with the Collier County Water-Sewer District and Florida Department of Environmental Protection standards, Following construction of these facilities, the District will turn these facilities over to the County Water-Sewer District for ownership and operation. The potable water facilities wilt ~nclude both transmission and distribution mains along with necessary valving fire hydrants and water services to individual lots and development parcels. Connections to the District Projects 1,$J Pelican Marsh is o proposed 2,075 acre planned, residential community located in the metropolitan Naples area of Collier County, Florida. The community wilt be fully amenitized and will offer a maximum of 1,2OO single family Jots; 4,400 multi- family units; two 18-hole golf courses; commercial: office, and hotel comptexes: a cultural center: a lake system: wetland preserves: fuji utility infrastructure~ landscaped roadways; gated entries: and security berms and walls~ The community will be developed in phases in response to market demands. Four phases of molar infrastructure construction are anticipated. Construction of the first phase began in July lC:?g3 and consists of infrastructure to support approximately 180 single family tots, 600 multi- family units, 27 holes of golf and a wetland mitigation project. Phased construction will continue through year 2005 when the community is expected to be completed The District ts surrounded by residential commercial and public land uses including Victoria Park and Crescent Lakes to the north: the proposed Livingston Road corridor to the east, Vanderbilt Beach road and the Emerald Lakes Monterrey and Pine Ridge subdivisions to the south; and LJ.S. 41 and Naples Park to the ,,vest. The District is located within the Collier County Water-Sewer District The Collier County Board of County Commissioners serve as Ex-Officio governing board of the Collier County Water- Sewer District. The County Water--Sewer District will provide water wastewater and irrigation water services to the prelect. Wastewater from the proposed proiect will be collected within the site and transported by pipeline to the North County Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. This facility is located lust north of the proiect site. The existing wastewater facility currently has a total capacity of 4.5 Pelican Marsh Master Plan mdhon gallons per day. The plant is currently being expanded to 7.5 million gallons per day and should be completed by summer t995. Potable water for the proiect wilt be provided by connechon to and extension of existing County Water- Sewer District water mains. There are existing water moms located around the District boundaries including mains located along U.S. 41, Goodlette-Frank Road lmmokalee Road Airport-- Pulling Road and along the proposed Vanderbitt Beach Road corridor. The mains range from 8 to 30 inches in diameter. Potable water will be provided by the 12.O miihon gallons per day North County Regional Water Treatment Plant. Irrigation water service will ultimately be provided by the County Water-Sewer District as reclaimed water becomes available from the North County Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility and from the proposed stormwater irrigation utility. Until the County Water-Sewer District is able to provide adequate reclaimed water from the North County Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (and, if necessary ~n the future to supplement the service) on-site ~rrJgation water storage faciht~es and pumping facilities for the D,s!rict will also be pray,dod. District Projects 16J 1" existing County system will be made at U.S. 41, Ooodlette-Frank Road, lmmokalee Road, Airport Road and along the proposed Vanderbilt Beach Road corridor. It is currently estimated that 1OO,OOO lineal feet of water main wilt be constructed. The wostewater facilities wilt inciude gravity coJlechon mains with individual lot sewer services, collection system pump stations, large master pump stations and force mains to connect to the existing Collier County system. It is proposed to provide connection to-the existing Collier County system at Goodlette-Frank Road, Airport Road and tmmokalee Road. It ,s currently estimated that 83,000 lineal feet of gravity collection system, 54,000 lineal feet of force main, 22 collection system pump stations, and 3 master pump stations wilt be constructed. The irrigation system ,,,,'ill include an ~rrigation water storage facility in which either water from on- site wells and/or reclaimed water-stormwater can be stored: an irrigation pumping facility~ and irrigation transmission/distribution mains with services for lots and development parcels. An initial phase of the on-site wells will be constructed until reclaimed water-stormwater becomes available. Dependent upon quantity of reclaimed water- stormwater available, additional future on-site wells may be constructed. An irrigation pumping facility will be constructed to deliver irrigation water to-users within the District. It is estimated that 116000 lineal feet of irrigation transmission/distribution mom will be constructed. Earl h~vork * Earthwork within the District will consist of the excavation of storm water management ponds with the excavated material being used for roadways, perimeter berms, and single family tot fill. The roadways and lots require fill to provide minimum finished elevations for flood protection. The ponds will be excavated to at least the mmimum s~ze and depth requirements of Collier County and South Florida Water Management District. It is currently estimated that 210 acres of ponds will be excavated resulting m 2.7 million cubic yards of useable soil. The District infrastructure needs are 2.7 million cubic yards to complete roadways, berms, and single family lots. However, 0.9 million cubic yards have been used in the construction of the first golf course. Thus, 1.8 million cubic yards are available for District infrastructure~ The deficit will be provided by the developer. StORM~vateR ManageMent The District stormwater management system will consist of excavated stormwater management ponds, culverts, catch basins, swales, and water control structures. Stormwater runoff from the areas within the District will be routed to the stormwater management ponds for water quality treatment and water quantity storage. The stormwater will be subsequently released v~a water control structures to the Pine Ridge and Airport Road canals. The stormwater management system will be designed in accordance with the South Florida Water Management Distr~ct standards. These regulations set minimum criteria for water quality treatment and flood protection. Road~vav Lighting Roadway hghting will be constructed along the roadways within the District. Lightmg poles will be spaced approximately every 200 feet along the 4dane sections and every 150 feet along the 2-lane sections. It is currently eshmated that 886 poles will be installed. Single or double luminaries will be installed as required. Dis eic PRojec, s 1 6 J 1 ' Landscaping Landscaping will be provided for the roadways, per~meter berms, and D~strict entrances. The landscaping wilt consist of sod, anr~ual flowers, shrubs, ground cover, littoral plants, and trees. Existing native vegetation will be worked into the landscape plan where possible. recreation, Parks, and Security Recreation and park facilities are proposed both within the District and off-site. The District facihties will consist of neighborhood community parks. The park facilities will be deyetoped in phases. Although specific development plans have not been established, typical facilities may include lighted tennis courts, children's playgrounds, basketball courts, and ancillary facilities such as restrooms and parking areas, Wetland Mitigation The Wetland Mitigation within the District will consist of the construction and planting of aquatic httoral zones, removal of exotic plant species~ the reestablishment of on-site wettands~ and enhancement of wetland hydroperiods. /V~itigation may occur off-site if feasible. Off-Si~ e IMpac'ls The off-site impacts will include the construction of the proposed Vanderbitt Beach Rood extension along the southern boundary of the District and the purchase of a 2a-acre school site. Security for the District will be provided through several different means. These may include guardhouses at main entrances, perimeter berms, walls and fences, and electronic security. The manned guardhouses will control access to and through the District. The community will be further secured by a combination of perimeter berms, walls, and fences. These facilities will alt be landscaped to blend info the environment, Special facilities such os remote security cameras and sensors may be utilized in the most exclusive areas to alert DiCricf security personnel fo unauthorized entry. LOCATION: S.E. Collier County ACRES: 5oo ESTABLISHED' September 1986 the .O tand Community Improvement District COUNTY: Collier BONDS ISSUED: $7,000,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: "~arer Management, Roadways, Sidewalks, Street Lighting, Landscape, Water, Sewer and Irrigation Facilities and Mosquito Control. The DiSTRiCT The District consists o{ approximately .500 acres in southeast Collier County. The District was organized and existing under the Constitution and lows o{ the State o[ Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section 190,014, Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of law (the 'Act")in September 1986 pursuant to a petition of the Prime Developer (hereinafter defined) to facilitate the development of the area within the District. The District is o community development district organized and existing under the Conshtution and laws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section t90.014. Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of taw {the "Act"}. it was established on January t0, 1991, pursuant to Rule 42K-1, Florida Administrative Code Rules and Regulations of the State of Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission, The Act provides for o five member Board of Superwsors to serve as a governing body of the District, The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt admimstrative rules and regulations with respect to any prolects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations, The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. /he chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Manager, The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and ~s responsible for preserving and maintaining any ~mprovement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. DisTriCT Projects Port of the Islands (the "DevelopmenF')Is located Just outside of Naples, Florida on Highway 41. tt is a resort and real estate development project situated on approximately 500 acres In Collier County.. Florida. Primary facilities include two hotel buildings with approximately 200 rooms, an RV park, a skeet range, a marina, and several Iow and medium density real estate development projects, which when completed will Include between 1,OOO - 2,OOO residential units. The Development is substantially self-contained with its own onsite water, sewerage and cable television system. Electrical power is supphed by Lee County Cooperative and telephone service ~s provided by United Telephone of Naples. Two existing sewage treatment and disposal facilities serve the lands north and south of Highway 41. The property ~s served by a well field located two miles from the Development, which is owned by the District. A water treatment and distribution system located in the Development serves its existing needs. Hydrological studies have determined that the existing fresh water supply is adequate to support anticipated development. Alt existing facilities hove excess capacity fo accommodate initial development and may be economically expanded to accommodate future development stages. In addition to the foregoing, existing facilities include o large hotel complex consisting of o ma~n lodge with 13 guest rooms, five patio buildings with ,48 guest rooms and a Marina Apartment Building consisting of 26 apartments located in the southern portion of the Development. A second hotel is located in the northern portion of the Development which contains 100 rooms and meeting facilities for up to 400. Recreational facilities including o river front recreational vehicle park with ]O0 spaces, o boat ramp, a recreahonaJ center and support focdifies, a hunt club with six fields of trap and skeet and a moving target range, and a marIna. Current zoning provides for o higher overall density than is deemed appropriate and supportable by the property infrastructure.. Accordingly, the Prime Developer anticipates modifying zomng and shift densities within the property boundaries as dictated by market needs. As necessary this will be accomplished by filing a series of subdivision maps which wilt ultimately be incorporated ~nto a single projects ptonned unit development. Currently alt planned deveiopment activities fit within existing zoning, This procedure ~s significant in that Jf permits development with o minimum of processing District Projects 16J 11 While the Development is located within the boundaries of the Big Cypress National Park ~'area of environmental concern" and is further surrounded by vast areas of state and national parks, anticipated development has been authorized. As anginal dredging, development, and zoning occurred prior to lg70 "vested~ development rights were created. Collier County has re-verified zoning under a new zoning ordinance in January lq82 and has designated the property as an "urban area for County planning and services" More recently, in 1985, the Developer entered into an umbrella agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation which permits development consistent with zoning and exempts the property from regional and environmental ~mpact requirements. Pursuant to this agreement, all permits sought to date have been granted by both local, state and federal agencies and future normal permitting is contemplated. Real estate products wilt be geared to middle and upper middle income groups who appreciate natural surroundings, resort amenities and modest prices. Proceeds received from the sale of the Bonds, after deduction of costs of ~ssuance, amounts representing capitalized interest and amounts required to fund the Reserve Fund, will be deposited into the Construction Fund created by the Indenture to pay costs associated with construction of the projects. The Project wilt primarily consist of the construction of water and sewer improvements, roads and drainage facilities. in the southwest quadrant of the Development, a utility system to service the East Channel Area (southeast quadrant), utility systems for the "Sunrise Cay" area, north and south sewer treatment plant expansions, general water treatment upgrades and other miscellaneous utility improvements, Approximately 33% of the total construction costs relating to the project are attributable to the roads and drainage facilities including facilities fo service the East Channel Area, the "Sunrise Cay" area and other miscellaneous roads and drainage improvements. Approximately 63% of the total costs of construction relating to the proiect ore attributable to water and sewer and utihty improvements, including the construction of a fire and irrigation system LOCATION: Osceola County Remington Community Development L)istrict 16J 1 ACRES: 734 ESTABLISHED: February 1994 COUNTY: Osceob BONDS ISSUED: $14,1oo,ooo DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Roadways, Utilities, Earthwork, XX/'atcr Management, Roadway Lighting, Landscaping & Bcm~s, Recreation, Parks 6,c S¢curiu,, Wetland Mitigation, Effluent Reuse Facilities. Jl!L!llllll!lr I IPlll Illl! Ill II!l Ill l I I II III! I!ll II Ill Jl[llll! Il 5JL_] ........ The DisTrict The District encompasses approximately 734 acres located in OsceoJa County, Florida. The District ~s approximately 20 mdes southeast of downtown Orlando, 10 miles south of Orlando International Airport and 12 miles east of Walt Disney World. The District is bordered on the west by the Florida Turnpike, on the south by Partin Settlement Road and on the east by Lake Shore Drive. Access is provided by Lake Shore Drive and Partin Settlement Road. The Distr~ct was established in February 1~q4 by Ordinance No, 94-2 of the Osceoia County Board of County Commissioners. The District is a community development district organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 100 and Section 190,014, Florida Statutes and other apphcable provisions of Jaw (the "Act"), The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect fo any proiecfs of fha District, and to enforce penalties for the wotafion of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors fo levy foxes under certain condffions, and fo levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District localities, The chief administrative official of o community development district is the District /kAanager, The Act prowdes that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and ~s responsible for preserving and maintaining any ~mprovement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the D~strict, and for performing such duhes as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. DistricT Projects The Remington Community Development District (District) Js a 734. acre Planned Unit Development (PUD} located in Osceola County, Florida. Infrastructure improvements within the District are to be constructed in three (3) phases; Phase lA, Phase 1 B and Phase 2. Approved land uses within the District consist of both single family and multi-family residential, commercial, open space and conservation. The development has been approved by Osceola County for a maximum of 2,413 residential dwethng units. Phase lA construction shall include J l) the excavation of surface water management lakes, interconnecting culverts and discharge control structures, (2) the grading, irrigation and grassing of the effluent disposal facility (3) construction of the collector roadway including utilities from Lake Shore Drive west to the PI'lose IA limits, (4) wetland mitigation and (5) site infrastructure improvements for Parcels A through E Additionally, Phase t A utility facility construction shall include an site master lift station and forcemain along with the off-site extension of a forcemain, water main and reuse mom as required to connect to the existing City of Kissimmee utility system Finally, Phase 1A construction wilt include intersection ~mprovements at Lake Shore Drive along with landscaping, security walls, gotehouse and street lighting. Completion of Phase t A construction will provide the required infrastructure to allow for the development of 473 residential units. Phase lB construction will include: (1)the excavation of surface water management lakes, interconnecting culverts and discharge control structures, (2) the continuation of the collector roadway including utihtJes within the Phase lB limits and (3) site infrastructure improvements for Parcels O through M. Additionally Phase 1B utility facility construction shall include an on-site lift station,and forcemain along with the extension of the on site water mains and reuse mains for service within Phase t B. Finally, Phase lB construction will include street landscaping, street hghting and community park related ,mprovements. Completion of Phase tB construction will provide the required infrastructure to allow for the development of an additional 725 residential units. Phase 2 construction wilt include: (1) the construction of the remaining portion of the Master Surface Water Management System including interconnecting culverts and control structures, (2) the completion of the collector roadway to the intersection at Parian ,Settlement Road, and (3) site infrastructure improvements for Parcels N through W including the comrnercial parcel, Phase 2 utility facility construction will consist of a gravity sewer collection system along with the extension of the on-site water mains and reuse mains for service within Phase 2 Finatiy, Phase 2 construction ,,v~ll include intersection improvements at Partin Settlement Rood along with landscaping, security walls gatehouse, and street lighting. Completion of Phase 2 construction wilt provide the required infrastructure to allow for the complehon of the District Projects 16J approved development, Improvements which will be constructed by the District, wilt include the following: .Surface Vb%ter ,Managemen'r System nc;uding lakes, culverts, and contro! structures Facil/b, includ ng earthwork and grassing. Collector Roadvva>, Improvemen!'s including drainage and ,..~tilit]es Wefiand M~tigat on ~?,!itv improvements ~nciuding forcemains. water moms reuse mains, on-site lift station and gray,fy sewer coi,'ec~ on system ~/te /qfras~ructure ~mprovements for ~he develoomenf ~9arce!s Landscaomg. secur?y' 'waii£ gateNouses ?eot /igi;tmg and ntersechor~ mprovemeq.~s L_ommc,q~?v Par~, xac/~ ties A description of each of the above items is presented below: Surface Water Management System - The District will construct a series of lakes, interconnecting culverts and discharge control structures which along with the on-site preserved wetlands will constitute the master stormwoter management localities for the District. The District's stormwater management facilities .'ill be designed to conform to the Osceola County and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) criteria for pre-development versus post- development runoff attenuation and water quality treatment. Effluent Disposal Facility - Per the Conditions of Approval of the RU,D,, the District is required to accept for reuse 1OO% of the District's generated sewage flows. To accommodate this requirement, the District wilt construct an Effluent Disposal Facility, This Effluent Disposal Facility wilt consist of the clearing, grading, irrigating and grassing of approximately 140 acres, plus the construction of an off-site reuse main to provide a connection to the City of Kissimmee Utility System and the construction of the omsite reuse mains throughout the District to make reuse water available to each and every residential unit. Collector Roadway Improvements - The District will construct the collector roadway network. Work to be completed includes clearing of the roadway right-ofiway, earthwork and grading installation of the required underground utilities and storm drainage construction of the roadway sub-base, base asphalt, curbing and pedestrian/bikeways. With the excephon of the first few hundred feet at the two proiect entrances, the collector roadways wilt be constructed as a three (3)lane facility The collector roadway near the project entrance vcJll be constructed as a 4 lane divided roadway, Att collector District Projects l_6J 1_1 roadways shall be constructed in accordance with current Osceolo County standards. Wetland Mitigation - The Master Land Use Plan was developed to minimize wetland impacts. However, a total of lc~,c)6 acres of wetlands will be impacted. Mitigation for these impacts inctude on-site wetland restoration, undisturbed wetland buffers and the creation of additional on-site wetlands. This mitigation plan has been reviewed and approved by South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Utility Improvements - The District will construct a master utility system designed to provide central wastewater, potable water and reuse water systems for each and every residential unit within the District. The construction of off-site utilities will also be required to make connections to the existing City of Kissimmee utility facilities. Work to be completed with the central wastewater system includes the construction of on-site lift stations and forcemains, along with the gravity sewer collection system. The construchon of the potable water distribution system will include the various size water mains along with fire hydrants os required to provide adequate fire flow protection ~n accordance with Osceola County standards. Work to be completed with the construction of the reuse main will include the various sized mains to provide adequate irrigation throughout the District. All of the utility systems will be designed in accordance with City al Kissimmee, Osceola County and FDEP current regulations. Site Infrastructure Improvements for the Development Parcels . The District wilt construct the site infrastructure improvements necessary for the development of the residential parcels within the District, Work to be completed includes the clearing and grading of the development parcels, construction of the stormwater management system and the construction of the roadways, utility and drainage improvements. All improvements associated with the development par6ets shall be designed and constructed ~n accordance with current Osceola County standards. Landscaping Security Walls' Gate Houses, Street Lighting and Intersection Improvements ~ The District will construct security facihties at both entrances to the district. These facilities will ~nclude a gate house facility and security walls. In addition the District shall provide landscaping, street lighting throughout the district which will at a mimmum meet current Osceola County standards. Community Park Facilities - The District will construct Community Park facilities that may be used and enioyed by oil residents in the District. These park facilities may include playground equipment, nature/fitness trails, picnic facJhties, tenms courts and/or basketball courts. 16J 1 CommunitT Development District LOCATION: St. Lucic CountT ACRES: 855 ESTABLISHED: Februm'y 11, 1992 COUNTY: St. I,ucie BONDS ISSUED: $9,000,0o0 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Water and x~,z~tewatc'r Distribution and Collection Facilities, Roadways, Earthwork and %X~tcr Management, The DisTrict The Reserve Community Development District was established on February 11, 1992 by ordinance of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners. The D~strict is immediately west of Interstate 95 and south of Reserve Boulevard in St. Luoe County, Florida, midway between Miami and Orlando and approximately one hour from West Palm Beach and Melbourne, Florida. The Reserve {the 'Development'1 is an upscate residential community within St. Luoe County, FiorJda. The development ~s proposed to be a mixture of large single fomdy, zero lot line and muttifamiJy residences, along with golf courses, commercial and industrial property. The District is on independent unit of local government created m accordance with the Uniform Community Development District Act of !980 Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the Act") by five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the Distr~ct. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors fo adopt administrative rules and regulations w, ifh respect fo any proiecfs of the District, and fo enforce penalties for the violahon of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of SupervIsors fo levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities, The chief administrative official of a community development distr~ct ~s the District Manager. The Act prowdes that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preservm9 and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant fo the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District and for performing such duhes os ordinance of the St, Lucie County Board of C o u n t y ~,.~.~;~//~,,~;;~ ~. Commissioners. The Act provides for o ~ -'~' Commu~eVelopment DiStrict · may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District, District Projects 16J The District, which falls within The Reserve Development of Regional Impact ("The Reserve'' or ~'DRI"), is comprised of approximately 855 acres that will be developed into residential, commercial and golf course properties. Three hundred acres are planned for nine-hundred residential units. The 482 acres comprising estimated acreages for golf course lands are currently planned for two championship courses and a learning center and driving range The lands within th( District are also approved for 39 acres of commercial development and 34 acres of rights-of-way, interconnected to the water system of the St. Lucie West Services District (~'St. Lucie West'~) and may be interconnected to the sewer system of St. Lucie West in the future. Effective February 1, 1995~ the District will purchase bulk water from St Lucie West Services District. This 20-year take-or-pay interconnect agreement calls for the bulk purchase of 50,000 gallons of water per day, or 200 Equivalent Residential Connections ("ERCs'), with the option to purchase additional capacity in increments of 25,000 gallons of water per day, or 100 ERCs. The agreement also provides the option to interconnect with ,St, Lucie West on wastewater and irrigation water under similar terms as the bulk purchase agreement for water. Water Management facilities and roadway projects consist of Drainage Diwdes, Reserve Boulevard, Perimeter Berms, Culverts C o n t r o I Structures, Lakes and Storm W Q t e r Canals. Reserve Boulevard exists as a four (4)lane divided Water and wastewater services to the District are provided by the District-owned Utility System (the "Utility") acquired from Reserve Utility February 1993, The Utility Corp ~n roadway utilizing a swale and culvert drainage system. The master DistricT ProjecTs 16J 1 stormwoter management system for The Reserve D.R.I is divided into three (3) sub-basins: Basins A, B and C Reserve Boulevard and oil of the land south of Reserve Boulevard comprise Basin C. Planned Development The development plan for the land within the District provides for a total of approximately 900 residential units around the two PGA 18-hate championship golf courses, including a variety of zero Jot line products, golf villas and single- family homesites, initially ail products wilt be marketed directly to PGA members, who hold the r~ght to first refusal for a fixed period of time and thereafter will be marketed to the general public, both locally and through the POAs 23000 members. One-hundred twenty-one zero Jot-line homesites have been contracted to be sold to a joint venture between Ruttenburg Home and Mi. Builders, the most successful builder within the Development over the past two years, with annual sales of 70- 1OO units, The contract for the sale of the zero lot hne product to the ioinf venture provides for all of the lots to be taken down over a two-year period at a price of $30,000 per lot. Golf villas will be marketed at pmces between $160.000 and $200,000. The remaining lots on the North Course include approximately 120 single-family lots and 48 estate lots: the sale of these iots is expected to be completed over a two-to three- year period. The 39,5 acres of commercial property within the District hove been approved for o 250~room hotel 50000 square feet of office space and 185000 square~'~.. -~.~ feet of commeroaJ space, c°mmu~evelOPment Distri~t: The Developer has initiated talks with differing hotel management companies. Development to date includes the construction of the 1-g5 interchange, Reserve Boulevard approximately 500 residential units, an eighteen- hole golf course and private country club, portions of the overall water management system and an industrial park. LOCATION: ACRES: 963 ESTABLISHED: iverwood Community Development District N.W. Charlotte Count), October 29, 1991 16J COUNTY: Charlotte BONDS ISSUED: $3O,085,OO0 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Roadways, Water, Silver and Irrigation Treatment Facilities& Collection-Transmission Lines, Earthwork, xX~ter Management and Recreation/Parks. I The DistricT Riverwood (the "Development")is a 1,265 acre master planned mixes-use community locates in northwest Charlotte County. The property has three relies of frontage on the Myakko River and about 1/2 mile of frontage on State Road 776. The property includes about 302 acres of preserve area which has been excluded from the District. The District encompasses approximately 963 acres of land in Charlotte County. The District is located lust north of El Jobean, south of the Port Charlotte Subdivision, west of State Road 776 and east of the Myakka River. The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a govermng body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect to any proiects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the vJoJotJon of such rules and regulations, The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The District is a community development district organized and existing under the Constitution and tows of fha State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section ]90.0]4 Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of law (the "Act"). It ,,vas established on October 29 1991 by ordinance of the Charlotte County Board of County Commissioners. The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervmors of the District. Riverwood was approved os o Development of Regional impact in January 199t. The approvals allow for a total of 3300 residential units, 334,000 square feet of commercial and office space, and conceptual approval for a marina. The Development has been approved in three increments with Increment I approved for 1,1OO residential units and t40,OOO square feet of commercial space. Riverwoods development plan calls for six separate and distinct parcels in increment I which will provide diversity of product type. The first three parcels, Parcels A, B and C, will contain small to mid- size single-family homes, zero Jot line product and mid-size to large single-family homes, respectively. The property's heavy coverage of pine trees.. the 200 acre preserve area and frontage along the Myakka River create a unique env~ronmenta!ly sensitive setting. The District has completed the construction of five basic categomes of infrastructure improvements: roadways, water distribution and irrigation facihties, sewage cotlechon and treatment facihties, water management and drainage facihties, and parks and recreational facilities. Roadways District Prolects included the construction of approximately 10,OOO lineal feet of Riverwood Drive, which serve as a four!one divided collection road for the District, a prolect entrance and a tunnel for a golf cart underpass. Construction consisted of clearing, paving drainage, earthworks., sidewalks landscaping and street hghtJng. Off site roadway improvements including roadway studies, design and construction as required by the DR1 development order were also included. Water Distribution and Irrigation The District connected to a water main located north of the Development m Port Charlotte operated by Charlotte County Utilities, which supplies potable water for the majority of the Development, Harbor Lakes Water Systems has a water main located along SR 776 which provides water to the eastern 1OO~ acres of the proiect ~ncluding the commercial tracts and Parcel A. Harbor Lakes Water System ~s also serviced by Charlotte County Utilities. Charlotte County District Projects 16J 1 Utihties currently has more than sufficient capacity to service the current and proiected future needs of the Development and other competing projects. According to the Countyf currently there are approximately 12 million gallons per day ("m.g.d.s"} of capacity of which approximately 7.5 m.gd's are being utilized at present. The District Er~gineer currently anticipates that the Development will utilize approximately .7 m.gd's at buildout, and there are currently no other large proiects under construction. In the event such services are not provided, the District Js authorized under the Act to construct ant install ifs own water distribution facilities tO service the needs of the Development. The District Proiects ~ncluded the construction and installation of approximately t4,000 lineal feet of various size potable water mains and 14000 lineal feet of various s~ze irrigation mares along with required connections, relying ant fittings, An irrigation pump station was otso constructed. Sewage Collection and Treatment Sanitary sewage collection mains were constructed along the main roadways in the District to collect and transmit sewage from individual development tracts to the on site wastewater treatment plant. The District Projects included the construction of approximately ]O,0OO lineal feet of various size sanitary sewage force mains and associated fittings. In addition, a portion of the proceeds of the Series 1992 Bonds were used to fund the acquisition by the District of on existing wastewater treatment plant to service lands within and without the boundaries of the District. The existing 100000 gallon per day (g.p,d,l plant is currently runmng at · approximately 50% of its capacity. ' ' The sewer system of the District (the ~'System'~}primarily consists of a wastewater treatment plant and sanitary sewage collection mains constructed along main roadways to collect and transmit sewage from individual development tracts to the wastewater treatment plant~ Currently wastewater is treated by the wastewater treatment plant of the District which serves several surrounding developments as well as Riverwood. The plant wilt service residents of the District as well as maintain service to other off-site customers. As development progresses and additional wastewater treatment capacity is required, the existing wastewater treatment plant will be phased out and a new facility constructed. The construction of the new facility is anticipated to be phased to meet the demands of the developing project. The new facility is anticipated to be designed to meet the current Florida Department of Environmental Regulation Rules, Chapter 17-,610 and this expanded facility is anticipated to be a Class I reliable system which will produce reuse water of sufficient quality to be utilized to supplement the prelects irrigation demands. A permit to construct a 250,O00 g.p.d facility has been obtained. Additional phases would be constructed as demands increase. The construction of the wastewater treatment plant is anticipated to be financed by the District through the issuance of revenue bonds secured primarily by monthly user fees and connection charges, Water/V~anagement and Drainage Water management and drainage facilities were constructed to collect, store, treat and convey storm water runoff from the lands within the District, These proiects generally included clearing, lake excavation and the construction and instaitation of major stormwater conveyance p~pes and control structures. District Proiects District Projects 16J included the construction of approximately 24 lakes, 12 water control structures, 8,500 lineal feet of storm drainage pipe and associated wetland mitigation, grodmg and erosion control features. Localized Improvements Certain projects and improvements required for individual tract development were also a portion of the District Projects. These include the construction of local subdivision roadways, water, sewer and irrigahon ma~n extensions into the individual subdivisions for Parceis A B and C within the District as well as drainage ant sanitary sewer pump stations. Parks and Recreation District Proiects included the construction of a r~ver park/pavilions, nature trails, boardwalks and various other outdoor recreational facilities. LuciE WEs Services District lSJ i LOCATION: Port St. Lucie, Florida ACRES: 4,600 ESTABLISHED: November 21, 1989 COUNTY: St. Luck' [3aNDS ISSUED: $87,690,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: XX~ater and Wastewater Treatment, ~ater and Wastewater Distribution and Collection Facilities, Tream~ent and Recla,i~ned Water Distribution System, Roadways, Landscape, Earthwork, 'Water Management and Mitigation, The District The District encompasses the St. Lucie West development, a 4,600 acre master-.planned community located in Port St. Lucia, FtorJda, midway between Miami and Orlando on the Atlantic Coast, The District is located in the Fort Pierce SMSA, which was one of the fastest growing metropohfan areas in the country in 1993. The District encompasses a rectangular parcel, three miles north fo south, and two and one-half miles east fo west. The D~sfricf is bordered on the west by Interstate 95 and the east by the Florida Turnpike. The District is on independent unit of local government created in accordance with the Uniform Community Development District Act of 1980, Chapter 190 Florida Statutes (the "Act") by rule of the Florida Land and Water Adiudicatory Commission adopted on November 21, 1989 and filed with the office of the Ftor~da Secretary of State on December 12, 1989 The Act provides for a five member Board of Superwsors to serve as a governing body of the Distr~ct. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect to any proiects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facJhties. ST. It~CIE /ESI Services District The chief administrative officiot of o community development district is the District Manager, The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. District Projects St. Lucia West (the "Development")is a self contained residentiaJ/commerc~al/industr iai community located in Port St. Lucia, Florida. The Development is located on approximately 4,,600 acres extending from Interstate 95 to the Florida Turnpike. Upon buildout, the Development is proiected to include a residential population of approximately 30,000 residents, The Development qualified under Florida Statutes as a Development of Regional impact. Th~s final development order allows for 18000 residential units. (D.] million square feet of industrial space 1.(~ million square feet of office space and 1,8 million square feet of commercial retail space, The central irrigation system serving the District consists of storage, pumping and transmission lines fo utilize highly treated wastewoter effluent os o primary source of water for the Districts irrigation system (the 'Irrigation System"), The system consists of rights to the use of effluent and easements to the 14.75 acre storage lake, two pumping stations and certain transmission lines. Additional transmission lines were installed fo expand line capacity fo serve in excess of 3,400 equivalent residential units, The Districts Water Management System consists of the surface water management system earthwork, drainage of rights-of-way, and roadways including the acquisition and construction of the maior basin divides known as S.W. Cahfornia, N.V~( Cahfornio~ S.W. Cashmere and other roads, as well as the lake system and interconnecting structures Jn Parcels 1,2,6,10 and others. Services District 1'he utility system of the District consists of o water treatment plant and distribution facilities and a sanitary sewerage collection and treatment facilities. The District acquired the utility system from St, Luoe West LltiJJfies, inc. a private utdit% The water plant utilizes state-of-the-art membrane softening treatment thereby producing water that exceeds oil present and proposed drinking water standards. The plant presently has capacity of one million gallons per day (equivalent to 4000 ERCs) and is expandable to ten million gallons per day (40000 ERCs). The wastewater treatment system provides an advanced secondary Jevei of treatmentt with the treated effluent used fo irrigate the golf course, common areas and residenhal lots within the District, The wastewafer treatment system is presently capable of advanced secondary treatment of one million gallons per day (5,OOO ERCs) and is expandable fo slx miJhon gallons per day (30,000 ERCs), District Projects residen lial DevelopMen ~' Counby Club Estates The first residential community within St. Lucie West is built around the 18 hole championship golf course and country dub. The homes in this community are located on the golf course and have an average pr,ce of $200,000, Heatherwood Heatherwood was originally planned as one neighborhood of 199 single fomdy residentJaf lots, which was then reptatted into two phases~ Heatherwood Phase I is platted for 88 lots sized at approximately 75 feet by 120 feet~ LOB have sold at an average price of $2Z5OO. Kings Isle by Lennar -- Lennar, Florida's largest home builder, is developing an active adult community within the Development. Lennar a wholly.owned subsidiary of Lennar Corporation, is primarily engaged in home building, commercial and residential real estate development and management, and real estate related financial services. Lennar has been building homes since 1954 and reports that, since its acquisition of Development Corporation of America in 1986, it has each year delivered more homes in Florida than any other home builder, Lennar is also active in the Arizona market, where it has built homes since 1972 and Texas, where it has built homes since 1991, Lennar has constructed and sold over 100,OOO homes to date. The age restricted community for adults over the age of 55 is planned for up to 8,000 units and features neighborhood villages of one, two and three bedroom Mediterranean styled homes priced from $,50,000 to $100,000, counties, commenced development of the 118 acre Lakes at St, Lucie West community in 1989 The 5t6 unit project offers 148 single family homes, 160 patio homes and 208 ffour-plex" homes around a series of lakes. Home prices range from approximately $70,000 for the four- plex unit, to the mid $90,OOOs for patio homes, to $ t30,OOO4 t40,OOO for single family residences. Lake Charles at St. Lucie West - Lake Charles is a 490 acre community in the southwest quadrant of the Development. The community is planned around a series of interlocking recreational lakes (126 acres in total) and several nature preserves. Four homestyles (45 foot lots, 55 foot lots, 80 foot lots and multi-family units) priced from $70:000 to $150,OO0 are planned for sale in the commumty, with primary emphasis on homes priced less than $t20,OOO The Lakes at St. Lucie West by DiVosta - DiVosta Homes a regional budder with extensive experience m Broward. Palm Beach and Martin ST. ! UC//:.: ¥EST Services District College Park- The Developer has commenced drafting of the site plan for th~s new' community that is adjacent to the campuses of Indian River Community College and Barry University/Florida Atlantic University. Discussions have been initiated with several builders, including d~scussions with DiVosta Homes to continue building homes in College Park similar to the homes completed by DiVosta in The Lakes of St. Lucre West. Co,,~m[rciat D[v[topm[~t The Developer proiects that the commercial and industrial establishments operating within St. Lucie West employ more than 2,000 on site workers with an estimated annual payroll exceeding $70 million. Extensive commercial development has occurred within St, /ucJe West, with several contracts recently closed. Commercial development to date includes the following: In August 1(9(92, the southeast based Publix grocery chain opened its largest store in the four county area, a 48,8(90 square foot market in The Shoppes at St. Lucie West~ In February 1(904, K.-Mart opened a 11,4,5OO square foot store, its second largest store an the state of Florida,~ to anchor Phase It of The Shoppes at St. Lucie West. CotaJfumo Development Company, ~n a joint venture with Martin Memorial Hospital, a 33(5 bed primary care health facility in neighbonng Martin County, recently held ground breaking ceremonies for a 24 acre medical campus ~n St. Luoe West, with construction underway. The County has constructed and ~s operating its St. Lucie County South Annex within the Development, Located within the 4t,OOO square foot facdity are offices for the County Commission, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, veterans affairs~ property appraiser, general adminstration, all license bureaus, Sheriffs department and courtrooms. Six banks have located or are scheduled to locate within the Development. Six restaurants have located or are scheduled to locate within St. Lucie West including the two restaurants in operation in Phase I Renar, the third most active home builder in the Development, has commenced construction of Renar Plaza.. a 36,000 square foot, two-story office building on St. Lucie West Boulevard. The building, which is 80 percent leased, will include a branch office of Port St. Lucie National Bank, offices of HCA Medical Center, and the corporate offtces of Renar, Central Park is a 12.4 acre, t4 parcel community of small offices and commercial establishments located on St. Lucie West Boulevard. Individual pad users include Allstate Insurance Company, a medical group practice and La Petite Day Care Center. La Petite, which is currently licensed for 300 children, ~s planning to expand its site to the adiacent tot. Six churches have located or have purchased land to locate within St, Lucie WesL The Catholic Church which has purchased a 13.5 acre site. has tentative plans to operate a parochial school in the Development. Cashmere Corners, a t4,86 acre parcel at the corner of St. Lucie West Boulevard and Cashmere Boulevard, is planned for a home expo center. Indus ~rial D~ ~lopn.~e n ~ S L l. LCIE ¥"ES 1 Services Distric~ Extensive industrial development has occurred w,~thin the master planned St. Lucie West Commerce Park ("Commerce Park~' or the "Park"). DisTriCT Projects 16d l' The location of Commerce Park on Interstate 95 midway between Orlando and Miami allows for one day turnaround hauls, as 80 percent of Florida's population falls within t50 miles of the Park, The Developer will build-to-suit and lease or sell at the option of the tenant/buyer. The 440 acre Park ~s zoned for light industrial and warehouse industrial space. Such zoning allows limited industrial activities of light intensity including manufacturing, distribution, assembly, warehousing, storing, processing and packaging of goods and materials, research and development, TV broadcasting and laboratory facilities. State of the art fiber optics capability is provided by Southern Bell Telephone Company. Natural gas lines are installed throughout Commerce Park and service is available from City Oas. In total, six million square feet of industrial space have been approved with 112 acres sold to date. Additionally, plans are underway for University Business Center, a high technology office/warehouse complex adjacent to the Florida Atlantic University campus. A series of eight 20,000 square foot buildings are initially planned for' multi-tenant occupancy. The Commerce Park has been approved as an applicant for status as a foreign trade zone, one of three sites making application to the U.S. Department of Commerce for such status in St. Lucie County. Recrl ational FaciliTies Thomas J, White Memorial Stadium The Development was planned using a malor league spring training stadium as a development anchor, with the construction of the $11 million Thomas J. White Memorial Stadium/St, Lucie County Sports Complex. The outdoor stadium offers capacity of Z400 and includes a private clubhouse, four minor league practice fields, batting cages, a minor league clubhouse, maintenance facility and parking for' more than 3,000 vehicles. The stadium is currently under lease to the New York Mets professional baseball organization, with an JnJtJaJ lease running through 2003. The stadium serves as the spring training home of the New York Mets, home of the St. Lucie /V~ets minor league team and headquarters of the M, ets farm team system. St. Lucie West Country Club and Golf Course - The St. Lucie West Country Club and Golf Course features an 18 hole championship course designed by Jim Fazio, which has hosted the Women's International Open championship golf event, Educational Facilit irs Two institutions of higher education are currently located within the Development. Indian River Community College ('IRCC"} and Barry University. S 11 L/_/CIE tV' 'S 1 Services Distric~ LOCATION: 'Thmpa ACRES: 5,400 ESTABLISHED: Tampa Palms Camm uniT, Development District June 13, 1982 COUNTY: Hillsboro BONDS ISSUED: $14,970,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Security, ~'ater Quality Monitoring, Storm Water Management System, \Vetland Preservation Areas, Landscaping and Public Parks. I III The DisTriCT The District encompasses approximately 5,400 acres of land in Hillsborough County {the "County"}, approximately 13 miles northeast of the central business district of the City of Tampa. The District was established in lg82 os a local unit of special-purpose government authorized under the Act. The area encompassed by the District was annexed by the City of Tampa ~n 1c~85. The District is o community development district organized and existing under the Constitution and taws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter such rules and regulations, The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and superwsion of the works of the District and ~s responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act for maintaining and operating the equipment owr~ed lc~0 Fi ' and oOt~derSa vi '°°~:~f ~':'~ :'~,/-~'o duties os may be prescribed by the (the "Act"}. ~;', Board of Supervisors of the District. The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative ,~"., rules and regulahons w~th respect to any prolects of the O~str~ct and to enforce penalties for the violation of The area encompassed by the District was annexed by the City of Tampa ~n 1985, and the District is responsible for planning, construction, operation and maintenance of security, water quality monitoring, portions of the storm water management system, wetland preservation areas, and tt are primarily residential areas, and Areas III and IV are anticipated to be devoted to both residential and commercial uses. In total,. Areas I and II are home to over 6,000 residents who reside in approximately 3,.000 single family, patio and multi- family homes. These homes (including lotsj range in price from $50,000 for a condominium unit to greater than $1,O00,000 for custom homes ~n the estate area known as The Reserve. Jn excess of 200,000 square feet of commercial development ties within the District, including a 123,0OO square foot City Plaza shopping center anchored by Publix, and over 90,000 square feet of Class A office space. landscaping and public parks~ District projects consist of landscaping irrigation, walls, sJgnage, structures, sidewalks street lights, bike paths, lakes, control structures wetland mitigation, sediment protection for preserve areas, parks and recreational facilities, and related engineering and architectural services. ]-he City of Tampa and Hillsborough County are responsible for the The District is located in the City of Tampa, and is situated in the growing Interstate 75 corridor, in a section known as New Tampa. Adlacent to the District is the University of ,South Florida, with an enrollment of over 33,000 students, and a growing number' of major corporations who have chosen to relocate to the area. United Services Auto Association (USAA) recently located its new southeast regional headquarters in the District with a planned employment of 1,500 persons. Although the headquarters building is located outside of Areas I and II, the planned employment is expected to provide a continuous demand for high quality housing. Nearby the District, Salomon Brothers United States domestic operations division recently relocated with current employment of over 600 ,,, persons. Other employers in or near the provision of other governmentalencompassesServices,¢~:~dt~.~ ,\,,x[)S;?/ ,,z~,<~-,,~ District include Bausch & Lomb, C~tlcorp The District ~'~,~ TimeLife, and GTE Data Services, approximately 5,400 acres of land in Hillsborough County, Florida and is separated into four geographic subdivisions, Areas I Tampa Palms. ,p ,O en S ace and TransTporta on Community [~e~velopment District LOCATION: 'I'bmpa ACRES: 5,200 ESTABLISHED: January 31, 1990 COUNTY: Hillsboro BONDS ISSUED: $%920,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Roadwa)% Water & Sewer Distribution and Collection Facilities, Streetlights, Securi~ Landscaping and Recreational Facilities. I I I'lllll I II II I The DisTriCT The Tampa Palms Open Space and Transportation Community Development District is a local unit of special purpose government of the State of Florida created in accordance with the Uniform Community Development District Act of ]980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, as amended (the 'Act"), by rule of the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission, effective January 3], lC~c)o. The lands governed by the District encompass approximately 5,200 acres located entirely within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Tampa, Florida. The District is a community development d~strict organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section tg0.0t4 Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of Jaw (the 'Act"). The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt odministrahve rules and regulations with respect fo any projects of the District, and fo enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and reguiahons. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors fo levy faxes under certain conditions and fo Jew speciot assessments, and fo charge collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and ~s responsible for preserving and maintaining any ~mprovement or facihty constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for mamtair~ing and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District. DiSTRiCT PRojecTS 16J 1 The Tampa Palms Open Space and Transportation Community Development District (District or TPOST CDD) consists of a total of approximately 5200 acres located entirely in the City of Tampa. Land within the District is presently owned by several different developers. The District has designated certain portions of the land within its boundaries by "Area" generally corresponding to the development plan and ownership of a specific developer. To date, the District has prepared improvement plans and validated bonds for two areas within the District. One such area called "Area 7" consists of approximately 1,240 gross acres of land. Of this acreage approximately 513 acres are developable. Of the 513 developable acres, approximately 450 acres are currently planned for single family use with 57 acres contemplated to be developed with commercial or multi family use, Atlantic Oulf of Tampa is the developer of the majority of the acres ~n Area 7. Area 7 is located in Sections 10, 11 and 12, Township 27 South, Range lC~ East between Interstate 75 and County Road 581. The lands within Area 7 were h~storically used for agricultural purposes and currently remains undeveloped The proiect zoning allows a development consisting of approximately 1,87(~ single family and multi-family residential dwelling units. Approximately 25 acres are designated for commercial development. tn order to serve the landowners and residents of the District, the District has developed and approved an Improvement Plan for Area 7 (the "Improvement Plan"). The Improvement Plan identifies certain transportation, water and sewer, landscaping, security, lighting and recreational facilities within and adiacent to the District that are necessitated by the development of Area 7. These improvements are contemplated to be constructed in two Phases. The TPOST CDD has financed and constructed certain infrastructure improvements necessitated by development within Area 7. C~enerally, these improvements include the construction of a road and its associated drainage facilities, water distribution facilities, samtory sewage collection facJhties, and o mitigation area. A description of each improvement follows: WEST MEADOWS BOULEVARD, PHASE t Phase I of West Meadows Boulevard is an approximately 6,100 linear foot roadway, which begins as a four lane divided urban section at the project entrance and tapers westerly into to a two-lane undivided rural section after approximately 12OO linear feet. In DistricT ProjecTs 16d addition, Phase I will includes the construction of a required left turn lane on County Road 58]. The work performed by the District include necessary earthwork, paving, associated drainage facilities, and a bridge and associated wildlife crossing. The District intends to convey the completed roadway to the City of Tampa for maintenance. WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES The District constructed approximately 6,100 feet of 1 6-inch maior water mare, as well as approximately 5,000 feet of a 12-inch sewage force main and approximately 1000 feet of gravity sewer main. All hnes are located in the right-of-way of West Meadows Boulevard. These water and sewer facJhties are required to serve the development needs of Area 7 and have been s~zed according to City of Tampa and Florida Department of Environmental Protection requirements. Upon completion, all of the water and sewer facilities will be dedicated to the City of Tampa for operation and maintenance. ENVIRONMENTAl_ MITIGATION Construction of District improvementsi including West Meadows Boulevard, necessitates the creation and ~mprovement of an upiand wetland mitigation area. This mitigation area, consisting of approximately 14 acres will be located west of 1-75. Upon completion, the District will own and maintain this mitigation area Jn accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements. I III LOCATION: ACRES: 170 ESTABLISHED: Village Center Community t)e~elopment District Lady I~ake, Florida August 17, 1992 $26,000,000 COUNTY: Lake BONDS ISSUED: DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Water/Wastewater Treatment and Distribution emd Collection Facilities, Roadwa)% Streetlighting, Landscape, Water Management, Mosquito Control, and Recreation and Park Facilities. I ! I I I Ill i Ill The District The District is o Iocot unit of special purpose government, which was established on August 17, 1992 by Ordinance adopted by the Town of Lady Lake. The District is located along U.S. Highway 441/27 approximately 50 miles north of Orlando and 20 miles south of Ocata. Pursuant to a development order, the District wilt eventually include approximately 500,000 square feet of commercial retail and office space. In 1992, the Village Center Community Development District (District) was estobhshed under Ordinance No. 92-06 of the Town of Lady Lake, Florida (the "Ordinance") as an independent special taxing District, as provided for and authorized by Chapter 190 Florida Statutes, to plan, finance, construct and/or acquire, operate and maintain community-wide infrastructure. The District is comprised of approximately 170 acres of existing and proposed commercial development and related roads located within the Town of Lady Lake, Florida. The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors fo serve os o governing body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors fo adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect fo any projects of the District, and fo enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulohons. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy foxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or facihfy constructed or erected pursuant fo the provisions of the Act, for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the Distr~ct, and for performing such duties os may be prescribed by the Board of Superwsors of the District. DisTRiCT PROj[CTS 1 5 ,.J The District is empowered to manage and finance: (i) water management and control systems; (ii) water and wastewater systems; (iii) District roads and, (iv) other infrastructure as required by a Development of Regional Impact Development Order. In addition to the general powers provided to the District under Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, pursuant to Section 190.012 of the Florida Statutes and as authorized by the Ordinance, the District's Board has the power to plan, establish acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate and maintain additional systems and facilities for: parks and facihties for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses; (ii) control and elimination of mosquitos and other arthropods of public health importance; (iii) security; and (iv) water main and plugs for fire prevention and control, The District acquired water and wostewater treatment, collection and distribution systems from Sunbelt Utilities, Inc. (the "UTILITY") which had owned and operated water~ wastewater, and reuse facilities which serve The Villages of Lake- Sumter, Inc. (Villages), an active adult retirement community. The UTILITY, located in central Florida in the Town of Lady Lake and unincorporated Lake County and Sumter County owned and operated a combined water and wastewater utility system. The District is responsible for wastewater collection, wastewater treatment, treated wastewater disposal (reuse), and water supply, treatment and distribution for the Viliages active adult retirement community. As of January 1~ lC)C)3 the estimated population of the Villages was c)100 This estimate is based on 1.c) people per connected housing unit and a total of 47c)1 housing units as determined from historical sales at the Villages. The estimate of 1.c) people per housing unit has been provided by the Villages and appears reasonable for a retirement commumty. The maiority of the water and wastewater facilities serving the Villages has been constructed during the past rune years. Thus, the system is a relatively "new' system, The Distr~ct operates and maintains the system such that these facilities are generally m excellent condition WASTEWATER SYSTEM The wastewater system of the District is served by 24 lift stations. These are interconnected by a system of force and District Projects gravity mains ranging in size from 3-inches fo 12- inches. There are approximately 52,000 feet of force mains and 217,500 feet of gravity mains which convey wastewater to the District's Wastewater Treatment Plant. high level disinfection. A permit from the FDEP allows effluent reuse irrigation on a C;~hole and an 18~hole golf course within the development, The water system owned and operated by the District was originally placed in service in the late A 0.5 m,g.d. Wastewater Ptant was constructed in lC)85 to replace a 0.15 m,g.d, extended aeration facility. The Wastewater Plant was expanded and upgraded in lc;c;o and has a Florida Department of Environmental Protection IFDEP) permitted capacity of 1.0 m.g.d.. Presently, the WWTP process tram consists of conventional diffused air activated sludge, dendrifJcation, secondary clarification, filtration and 19601. Well water ~s pumped from the Floridan aquifer, chlorinated and discharged into the elevated steel water storage tank. The second new well was put online in May 1985. A third water supply well was constructed and put online in October, lC~8C7. There ore also approximately 50 miles of large and small diameter PVC water mains in the water system. Villag e No. 1 Conmmnity I9-c ,clopmcnt District LOCATION: Sumter County ACRES: 998 ESTABLISHED: COUNTY: Sumtcr BONDS ISSUED: $26,575,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: February 21, 1992 ~ater/Wastewater Distribution and Collection Facilities, Roadways, Streetlighting, l.andscape, Water Management, and ',X/ettand Mitigation. The District The District encompasses approximately 998 acres in the northeastern corner of Sumter County, Florida. The District is bordered by the Sumter County-Lake County tine and Highway 44] fo the east., the Sumter County Morion County line to the north and Sumter County Road C466 fo the south, The District ~s located approximately 50 miles north of Orlando and 20 miles south of Ocala. The District was established on February 21, 1992 by ordinance of the Sumter County Board of County Commissioners, and increased from 799.5 acres to Oq8 acres pursuant to an ordinance enacted on July 5 1994, The Proiect consists of the construction or acquisition of on-site and off-site roadway serve os a governing body of the Distr*ct. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations with respect to any proiects of the District,, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments, and to charge collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of o community development district ~s the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the Distr<t and is responsible for preserwng and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or ~mprovements, wetland mitigation ~~~ erected pursuant to the provisions of the stormwater management, water and Act, for mainta,ning and operating wastewater facilities, street _~,~~"~l~ll~,~y~N~.,,. the equipment owned by the ilghhng, landscaping and Z District and for performing such ~rr!gation ~Ok~/.O duties os may be prescribed by, l:" az:-Vill Board of Supervisors of the The Act provides for o five D~smct. member Board of Supervisors to District Projects 16j ii Village Community [)development District No. 1 (District) is o c)c~8 acre planned, mixed use development located in the northeast corner of Sumter County, Florida~ The District is further II! located within The TrkCounty ViJtages (The Villages), comprised of 7,385 acres being developed by The Villages of Lake - Sumter, inc. (Developer}, A 5,39c~ acre portion of The Villages ~s vested (planned prior to Development of Regional Impact Rules) or a Florida Development of Regional Impact (D.R.I.). An additional 1,68:3 A development order was issued September 20, 1094, by the Sumter County Board of Commissioners. This development order includes Orange Blossom Gardens South and Orange Blossom Gardens West, an additional 448 building sites in Lady Lake and 0250 budding sites in Sumter County. This results in one order~ collectively known as the TrJ-County Villages, authorizing construction of 14,448 home s~tes, 2J60,0OO square feet of commercial area, 780 acres of golf courses and other related activities on a total of 4,385 acres. The District is located within this development order area. Residential housing development consists of a mixture of conventional s,ngJe family dwellings and courtyard villa single family dweJhngs, The courtyard villa dwellings ore constructed on smaller lots resulting in more affordable housing w~th less yard maintenance while at the same time providing privacy and security. Review' of the Sumter County Comprehensive Plan indicates the development of the District is consistent with the plan and future land use mop, The D.str~ct was granted a planned unit development (PUD,) zomng allowing for the anticipated development of the property, by the action of the Sumter County Board of Commissioners April 12, 1994. Phase I Development Status Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series lg92, were issued June 1, lgg2 in the amount of $16,400,000,O0 which resulted in on acres of The Villages is agricultural land ~D~O~ acquisition and construction fund of in Marion County that will also be ~"'~~, ~~~ $11 341,OOO,OO. This amount included developed os o D.Rt. in the future. _~¢'~'~,'~lll~,c~- $9,670,000.00 in subdivision ore ~~ In addition there approximately 300 adiacent developable acres currently being used for support purposes. improvements for o proiected t,630 residential building sites and $1,671,000.00 for general proiect wide improvements. The final subdivision and collector road construction is complete resulting in o total of 1,676 building sites. Phase t proiections included $187,00000 for an emergency servIces facility of which $66,250.00 was used for site acquisition. Construction of the Fire Department and Sheriffs Substation was recently started. Oenerol Description of Phase II Development Phase II is located westerly in the District wh,ch is adjacent to the west boundary of the Town of Lady Lake, southwest of US Highway 44t/2Z in the extreme northeast corner of Sumter County. Phase il includes development of 1,173 standard building lots and 617 villa building lots. The tracts scheduled for development are free from unfavorable environmental conditions and no s~gnificant or unique topographical or other features are present on these sites. $oil conditions in the District are excellent for development other than those areas set aside as protected wetlands. Stormwater treatment will be carried out through Land Development Code which requires that drainage systems be designed for rainstorms of maximum intensity based on a 2,5 year return interval. The District will also adhere to the requirements of $umter County and the Southwest Florida Water Management District that all building floor levels be constructed above anticipated flood elevations for the 100 year 24 hour storm event. Treatment of stormwater will be provided in accordance with the design guidelines of the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Stormwater runoff will be collected by curbs with drainage inlets and an underground storm~sewer pipe system, except for portions of Morse Boulevard which is designed as a "rural" roadway section with grassed roadv,,ay swales. The perimeter of the large wetland located in the south-central part of Phase JJ Js proposed to be landscaped with wetland trees and plants to provide enhanced aesthetics and a diversity of the use of existing and/or created wetlands/lakesystems. Desian criteria ..~O~E).wildlife. Several small areas of the ~ wetlands will be impacted by construction efforts. In order to management facilities is regulated ~/'~'~lllrl~'~"' compensate for these impacts, by Sumter County and the ~k~~~'-~~']~Z addmonaJ wetlands are Southwest Florida Water ,~_..)~,,. ~ /,~ proposed to be created by Management D~strict. The ~ "- ~ ~ ~ enlarging the existing wetlands. IV'Il I District will adhere to the design ,~ ~ j,,,~,~ A conceptual permit has been criteria of the Sumter County J, 'ir .J..~..,l.~,,,ll,~_~,.~J issued by the Southwest Florida Water Management District and a construction permit has been issued by the U,S. Army Corps of Engineers for the wetland excavation/mitigation for Orange Blossom Gardens West. A construction permit is anticipated to be issued by the Southwest Florida Water Management District for the wetland excavation/mitigation. The Village Center Community Development District, Department of Public Works (Village Center) located in Lady Lake approximately 1 mile east of the ~)istrJct, wiJJ provide both water and wastewater services through an interlocal agreement between the Village Center and the District. Water and wastewater facilities are currently available at the easterly boundary of Phase tl, The mare point of connection to the water distribution system will be the 10" water mare running along the constructed portion of Morse Boulevard. The main point of connection to the wastewater collection system will be to an existing forcemain located on Rio Grande Avenue and Morse Boulevard. A second point of connection wiJJ be to a new lift station to be located northwesterly in the District. It is expected that the existing Jilt stations and three additional lift stations w~ll be sufficient to accommodate Phase II. Design of the wastewater collection system and the water distribution system for potable water and fire protection will be in accordance with the criteria and guidelines of Sumter County and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, The collector roadway systems scheduled for Phase II of the District includes the remainder of Morse Boulevard and Paige Place, Phase I and Phase It of Morse Boulevard were constructed during Phase J and c o.qnects County ~ Road C-466 on the south boundary of the District to the central area of the District. This work includes roads, drainage, utilities and landscaping. Paige Place when constructed will connect Morse Boulevard to Avenida Central in Lady Lake. Morse Boulevard construction includes major intersection improvements at its connection with US Highway 441/27. These intersection improvements will include deceleration lanes, dedicated right and left turn lanes, and traffic control devices. In accordance with the development order for Orange Blossom Oardens West, the District will be responsible for a portion of the construction costs for the widening and resurfacing of County Road C- 466 from the Sumter County hne to U.S, Highway 301. 16J 1 Community Development District -- LOCATION: N.~r. Hillsboro County ACRES: 746 ESTABLISHED: November 13, 1990 COUNTY: Hillsboro BONDS ISSUED: $11,190,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Roadways, Water, XXZastewater & Eflquent Reuse Utilities, Earthwork, ~ratcr Management, Landscaping Berms, Parks & Recreation, XX/etland Mitigation, Off-Site Improvements. 1/! II I I !l The District The Distr~ct was estabhshed pursuant to the Act on November 13, 19c)0 (which establishment was ratified and confirmed by the County on February 26, 19qt), and consists of approximately 746 acres located in northwestern Hillsborough County. Florido~ approximately 10 miles west of downtown Tampa, Florida and approximately 12 miles east of downtown Clearwater, Florida. The Westchase Development is located in northwest Hillsborough County, Florida and consists of approximately 2,100 acres of land. 1'he District Js a community development district organized and ex~shng under the Constitution and laws of the ,State of Florida, particularly Chapter 190 and Section 190.014, Florida Statutes and other applicable provisions of law (the "Act"). The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve as a governing body of the Distr~ct. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt odminisfrahve rules and reguJahons with respect to any projects of the District, and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulahons. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors fo Jew foxes under certain conditions, and fo levy speoat assessments and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The cNef administrative official of o community development district is the District /M, anager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserving and maintaining any improvement or foohty constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act. for maintaining and operahng the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Supervisors of the District DiSTRiCTPRO]ECrS 16J I Westchase is an approved development planned for a total of 5,700* residential units, as well as 320,000 square feet of commercial space and 300,000 square feet of office space. The residential development 'wilt be situated within individual pods located around an 18-hole golf course designed by Lloyd Clifton. There will be a variety of single family and muJtifamiJy product types offered to home buyers. Amenities include a traditional clubhouse with approximately 12,OO0 square feet, a pro shop, locker rooms and banquet facilities. The Westchase Community Development District (the "District"}, encompassing approximately 740 acres in Hillsborough County, Florida, was created to provide an efficient financing mechanism for a portion of the public infrastructure costs associated with this planned development community. The District is currently bordered by Countryway Subdivision to the south, the balance of Westchase Subdivision to the eosL Twin Branch Acres Subdivision to the west and undeveloped land to the north. single family units and 1620 multi-family units. These levels are well within the allowable densities approved for planned development within the District (mixed use zoning). Other major features of the plan include community parks and the protection of over 2,50 acres of wettand areas. The stormwater runoff from the District area drains to Double Branch Creek via three general outfall points. The north central portion of the District drains to the upper reach of Double Branch Creek within District limits. Surface water runoff from the southwest proiect area drains to a railroad ditch adiacent to the south boundary. This ditch ultimately conveys flows to Double Branch Creek, The third outfaJl is the Countryway drainage system which receive flows from the southeast District area. The Countryway system also connects to Double Branch Creek. The District's stormwater management system includes 27 Jokes. incorporated into the stormwater systems are numerous isolated wetland areas, Stormwater conveyance systems, including inlets and pipe networks, wiJJ collect and convey runoff to the various lakes and wetlands, Weir and orifice structures are used to attenuate post,- development discharge Current plans {or the ~j~ (~J~J~5~5~ rates to the basin District include c}83 outfalis, Stormwater DisTriCT Projects l_6J 1_ treatment ~s provided in o combination of wetlands treatment and extended/wet detention. Drawdown weirs and orifices are used to provide the extended detention necessary for the plants to assimilate the pollutants in the runoff. The design criteria for the District's stormwater management facilities are regulated by Hillsborough County and the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). The master drainage plan also depicts approximately 250 acres of natural wetlands on the District property. Varying limits of the wetland areas were designated by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), the Southwest FJomda Water Management Distnct (SWFWMD) the Army CorD. of Enaineers ICOE) Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County (EPC). Approximately 80% of these wetlands are forested systems while approximately 20% are herbaceous systems. The wetlands have been included as an integral part of the master stormwater system providing the required treatment and attenuation, 'WASTE'v~ATE R The District wastewater collection/transmission system wiJJ consist of various gravity sewers conveying flows to two pump stations, Wastewater treatment will be provided at the Northwest Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, a Hillsborough County Utilities Department facility. This existing plant one of the Countys newest facilities, is located north of the District DesJon of both the Dump station systems and DistricT ProjecTs 16J meets the technical criteria of Hillsborough County and the FDER. WATER The Hillsborough County Northwest Water System will be the source of potable water and fire protection demands generated within the District. The 16" and 20" waterma~ns in Countryway Boulevard at the south and north property boundaries respectively, and the 16'~ watermain in Linebaugh Avenue at the east boundary of the District wilt be the main points of connection to the County system. These mains will be extended through the project along Linebaugh Avenue and Countryway Boulevard to provide a looped system. Design of the water distribution for both potable and fire protection uses meets the technical criteria of Hillsborough County and FDER. claimed main located in the of the District oreo. A 12" re-claimed water line will be extended west along Linebaugh Avenue to the west boundary, This 12" line will also be extended to both the north and south boundaries along Countryway Boulevard. The source is the existing County 36" re- TECO easement east Linebaugh Avenue (east), Waters Avenue [south via Countrywoy Blvd.), Sheldon Road (east via Linebaugh Avenue), Hillsborough Avenue, Racetrack Road (west via Lmebaugh Avenue Extension), Ehrlich Road Extension (north proposed) and the Northwest Expressway (proposed). These roadways wilt provide access to the District from a multitude of direchons, With the exception of the local roadway systems within each development parcel, the main components of the DistricFs roadway network are Countryway Boulevard and Linebaugh Avenue Linebaugh Avenue is an arterial road extending from Sheldon Road to the west boundary of the District. This roadway will be a four lane divided section, with sufficient right-off-way for future widening to six lanes. Countryway Boulevard will be the prImary north/south route extending from Countryway Subdivision along the south boundary to the future extensions of Ehrhch Road at the north boundary. The south portion of the roadway will be a two lane divided section; the north portion will be a four land divided section. Each development parcel will contain a series of local roads connecting to the primary network roadways described above. As w~th the primary roads, design of the local roads ~s required to be in accordance with county standards. ROADWAYS The maior roadways in the vicinity of the District include LOCATION: ACRES: 946 ESTABLISHED: CommunitT Development District N.W. Hillsboro Count)' 6J 1 July 28, 1995 COUNTY: Hillsboro BONDS ISSUED: $3,550,000 DISTRICT FACILITIES, SERVICE & IMPROVEMENTS: Roadways, XX~ater, ~astewatcr & Effluent Reuse Utilities, Earthwork, ~ater Management, Landscaping Berms, Parks & Recreation, Wetland Mitigation, Off-Site Improvements. I I II Ill III Illllll II The District The District encompasses approx,mateJy 946 acres ~n northwest Hdlsborough County, Florida The District was established, by ordinance of the Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners on July 28, 1995. The District is located approximately !,5 miles northwest of downtown Tampa, The District is on independent unit of local government created ~n accordance with the Uniform Community Development District Act of lC~80, Chapter 190 Florida Statutes (the "Act") and pursuant to the ordinance of the Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners. The Proiect consists of the construction or acquisition within a portion of the District of roadway ~mprovements, stormwater management, water and wastewater facilities, street lighting, landscaping and recbmed water, The Westchase Development northwest Hilisborouah County, Florida and consists of : approximately 2 acres of land, is located in The Act provides for a five member Board of Supervisors to serve os o govermng body of the District. The Act empowers the Board of Supervisors to adopt administrative rules and regulations wJfh respect to any projects of the District. and to enforce penalties for the violation of such rules and regulations. The Act permits the Board of Supervisors to levy taxes under certain conditions, and to levy special assessments., and to charge, collect and enforce fees and user charges for use of District facilities. The chief administrative official of a community development district is the District Manager. The Act provides that the District Manager has charge and supervision of the works of the District and is responsible for preserwng and maintaining any improvement or facility constructed or erected pursuant to the provisions of the Act. for maintaining and operating the equipment owned by the District, and for performing such duties as ~j~ may be prescribed by the Board of Superwsors of the District, DistricT Projects 1 The Westchase East Community Development District (the "District"), encompassing approximately 946 acres m Hillsborough County, Florida, was created to provide an efficient financing mechanism for a portion of the public infrastructure costs associated with this planned development community. The District ~s currently bordered by Countryway Subdivision and TECO property to the south, the balance of Westchase Subdivision to the west, undeveloped land to the north and Sheldon Road on the east. Ultimate plans for the District include approximately 1,652 single family units, 1,050 multi-family and 2,.5 acres of commercial development. Each of these proiects will receive funding, from the District, for a portion of the infrastructure (paving, utilities, drainage and grading). Other features of the plan for the District include construction of arterial and collector roads with utilities to serve individual sections and construction of community parks. Also.. the District will contain an elementary school., junior high school and approximately 250 acres of wetlands. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The easternmost portion of the District between Sheldon Road and the north/south TECO transmission line drains southeast underneath Sheldon Road to Rocky Creek. The majority of the District drains southwest to Double Branch Creek via several outfall points. The District's stormwater management system includes 38 lakes. Incorporated into the stormwater systems are numerous isolated wetland areas. Stormwater conveyance systems, including inlets and pipe networks, wdl collect and convey runoff to the various lakes and wetlands, Weir and orifice structures are used to attenuate post- development discharge rates to the basin outfalls, Stormwater treatment is provided in o combination of wetlands treatment and extended/wet detention. Drawdown weirs and orifices are used to provide the extended detention necessary for the plants to assimilate the pollutants in the runoff. The design criteria for the District's stormwater management facilities are regulated by Hillsborough County and the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). In general, the post~ development surface water discharge rate resulting from the 25 year frequency - 24 hour duration storm event must not exceed the pre-development runoff rate from the tO year frequency -,- 24 hour duration event. Treatment of stormwater must be provided m accordance with SWFWMD design guidehnes. The master drainage plan also depicts approximately 250 acres of natural wetlands on ~:~ the District property. (-~S/,C,~S~, C~/.,S~ Varying limits of the DistricT Projects 16J 1 wetlands areas were designated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), the Army Carp of Engineers (CAE) and the Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County (EPC). Approximately c)o% of these wetlands are forested systems while approximately 10% are herbaceous systems. The wetlands have been included as an integral part of the master sformwater system providing the required treatment and attenuation. WASTEWATER The District wostewater collection/transmission system will consist of various gravity sewers conveying flows to three pump stations Wastewater treatment will be provided at the Northwest Regional Water Reclamation Plant, o Hillsborough County Utilities Department facility. This existing plant, one of the Countys newest facilities, is located north of the District Design of the pump station systems and gravity collection systems meet the technical criteria of Hillsborough County and the FDEP. WATER a looped system. Design of the water distribution for both potable and fire protection uses meets the technical criteria of Hillsborough County and FDEP RECLAIMED WATER A 16" reclaimed water line in Linebaugh Avenue will be the main point of connection to the County system. The source is the existing County 30" reclaimed main located in the TECO transmission line corridor on the east side of the District. The District will also construct a 24" reclaimed water line northwest of the D~strict to provide a looped system. ROADW'AYS The major roadways m the vicinity of the District include Linebaugh Avenue, Waters Avenue (south via Montague Street or Countryway Blvd.), Sheldon Road (east), Hillsborough Avenue, Racetrack Road (west via Linebaugh Avenue Extension), Ehrhch Road Extension (north proposed) and the Veterans Expressway~ These roadways will provide access to the District from a multitude of directions, The Hillsborough County Northwest Water System will be the source of potable water and fire protection demands generated within the District. The 16'' watermain in Linebaugh Avenue in the center of the District will be the main point of connection to the County system. This 16'~ main connects to a 20': watermain ~n Countryway Boulevard west of the District and watermains in Sheldon Road on the east side of the District to provide :~~jl~ With the exception of the local roadway systems within each development parcel~ the mare components of the District's roadway network are Sheldon Road, Linebaugh Avenue and Montague Street. Each development parcel will contain a ser~es of local roads connecting to the primary network roadways described above. As with the primary roads, design of the local roads ts required to be ~n accordance with county standards. 16J g ]6J l_6J xx~< < .<. < ~ ~ ::::rn I __ I "'" , I ?"~'~ ~1 ~ ~0~ 0 -' - ~= m ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 l_6J II 16J I'!'1 rn Memorandum 16J 1' To: From: Date: Subject: James P. Ward, Manager Pelican Bay Services~rict Edward J. Kant, P.E~ Transportation Operations Director August20,2002 Pelican Bay Sidewalk Safety Improvements You are aware that about two years ago, the PBSD requested that Collier County investigate and advise with respect to several intersections in Pelican Bay where the facilities for pedestrian crossings are less than adequate and may be safety hazards. We had presented our findings to the PBSD Advisory Board about a year and a half ago. At that time there was some concern on their part regarding the need for cutting back on several island nose tips and on the addition of advance warning signs for motorists. The Advisory Board requested that we revise the plans to minimize the sign issue and any impacts on the median plantings. We have taken that request into consideration and we have completed the final plans for the three intersections of interest: Pelican Bay Boulevard and Ridgewood Drive, Crayton Road and Hammock Oak Drive. We have received bids and we are preparing to issue a Notice to Proceed to the Contractor within the next two weeks. Attached are copies of the plans for you and Kyle Lukasz. You may wish to share this information with the PBSD Advisory Board. Please advise if you need any further information at this time. CC: James V. Mudd, County Manager Norman E. Feder, AICP, Transportation Administrator Kyle Lukasz, PBSD Field Supervisor Julio Ordonez, P.E., Operations Design Section Manager Michael Etelamaki, Road Maintenance Director John Vliet Road and Bridge Superintendent File: Pelican Bay (Sidewalks) Attachment as stated: Two sets of construction plans D'mtsportation Operations Department 100% CRAYI'ON ROAD DRI%IE c ~°3 ,~ o PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD r- US 4-1 TAMIAMI TRAIL PLANS 6/o4/oa S ID E WA t.,K O om C~ Z O PELICAN .BAY IMPROVEMENTS BOULEVARD ;I uO ~7 d~c::u) z~u~~o(::: ::0°"° ~ "om '~ ::> :> ~r-o or-'° z m~m:~U=l .mo~mm>~md °m-mmm~:>---4d =1 md m__._ z ~:~ ::FI z m Z::_----T-.CO"Ud mm=~:~ 0'"~, :;I r-Z .~,'r,1--ir-o Z~ ~ O)>J- .:;00'0...~; 3> ;O r,~ .4~ ..L . ,...,o ~"u~o o~o ~ oz:,-~° ::0~m _o_:>,,,< >~:oo< ~o ~ r4o ,-.-~o .-,-,o>_o o e~,", o§~ o-1-- o ~:,-,.,_o .~ ~ ~:m =',._'~:z'-;4 ~:z :¢0.~.:~ z. o~o~z z m > ~-0 -o~' -~ z' ~o~ ~! :~m>~:~ ~1 z~'~ -0:=:~D___~z. >~zz. r' c> o~-> > > ~'~-~ N "::d ~>.-- m> R:~o z-on :¢'~--<~ ~ ¢~ 8p~ _;9~> '-'-~> .-,r,', ×~,.'1 .I ~ ~.zo'-'---' Oz° 0-'" ~m>z-'" '"~ ~ ~0-- 0 ~.. < '1" ~8=~ ~-~ ~ z.Z_>~'"_> ~9~=~ > ' ~ ~§ ~ ~ ~:dz r'z ~,,~ %" > (.n ::o:>m '-' :¢o~ ~g >r- _-~ oo ¢~ z-0-< ..... z ~.. '->oE' z -o~;0 ~.>~ Dz~ ~,-- '~lV~ '-. ~ ~. o o .....o o=,-._ f~ t"- Om I '-~Z~ ~Ou'~~ '"'"'"'""=" o=>-- ~'*a"' o~po~ ~, F~ o-.-, oo-0~ >"-'x~-, ,,~ ,,-,, O O -(0o3 ~ ~) o-~o zo .'.' r- '"-' r-- ~ oz ~O mm^ ~>~om ~ o~ o .4_o0 oo ~, o ~ -r-,.,-~m > ~ z~ ~-~ m ~orrl r-r'q · F--- 00~ I ;3q E:I~ 13 '"'~i~)~ ¢.~ 0 z"r z ~ ~ O'u ' ~ > <~ ~ zo I ~:M -< o~ ,~ r,',~r,', :~o -~ -->'-""' ~ :~> D,"' r-.',-->z ' ~ o ,:,- ,-,, o .,., u~,.-j m >~ ~ om m m 16J 1 :~ ..~ o ~o z ~oo -,o ~ ~8 o o~ ~o Z~o ~ ZO ~ O~ O~ ~> z~ ~ o~o>m>o ~ u'om o~ ~ o~ o~8 ~ 0 o,..- ,-,, · mc ,.1~. ×Ec~ =o ~'o -',~ ~a ~ °°~ ~o ~ ~ ~z =o ~ Oo PC) JlllJlilil / 'q} // / / $~ / / &qNO S~SOdblRd O'NICJCII~ ~0:! COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 16J PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BUDGET HEARING TO BE HELD AT THE FOUNDATION CENTER 8962 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA AGENDA Monday, September 9. 2002 6:00 p.m. NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 99-22 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE ['PON ~VHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS PERMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING- BCC A. PRESENTATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2003 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BUDGET. Bo RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL AS THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ADOPTING SAME AS THE NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PURPOSES OF UTILIZING THE UNIFORM METHOD OF COLLECTION. 3. ADJOURN I September ~. 2002 16J 1 Assessment against the benefited properties within the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Ben~~~it. /// ~/ / --/--' ~ '~ ~" ,; ~ ,,~'~-D DAT E: //~/ PREPARED BY: ~r~, ~ ' / ~' JCes P. Ward, DepaAment Director pelican Bay Se~ices Division APPROVED BY:, --~-'~ James V. Mudd County Manager ', ....' DATE: SEP - 9 2OO2 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL AS THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ADOPTING SAME AS THE NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT 7 ROLL FOR PURPOSES OF UTILIZING THE UNIFORM $ 1 METHOD OF COLLECTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 9 197.3632, FLORIDA STATUTES, WITHIN THE PELICAN BAY 10 MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING AND BENEFIT UNIT FOR 11 MAINTENANCE OF THE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, 12 BEAUTIFICATION OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND 13 MEDIAN AREAS, AND MAINTENANCE OF CONSERVATION 14 OR PRESERVE AREAS, AND ESTABLISHMENT OF CAPITAL 15 RESERVE FUNDS FOR AMBIENT NOISE MANAGEMENT, 16 MAINTENANCE OF CONSERVATION OR PRESERVE AREAS, 17 U.S. 41 BERMS, STREET SIGNAGE REPLACEMENTS WITHIN 1 $ THE MEDIAN AREAS AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS 19 TO U.S. 41 ENTRANCES, ALL WITHIN THE PELICAN BAY 20 MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING AND BENEFIT UNIT. 21 WHEREAS, the Pelican Bay Improvement District (hereinafter "District") was 29 created and operated pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 74-462, Laws of Florida, as 93 amended, and was vested with the power and authority to levy and collect special 94 assessments and charges against real property with the District; and 95 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on 96 June 19, 1990 succeeded to the principal functions of the Pelican Bay Improvement District 97 pursuant to Chapter 74-462, Laws of Florida; and 95 WHEREAS, the Pelican Bay Improvement District completed construction of 99 certain water management improvements in accordance with the Plan of Reclamation of the 30 Pelican Bay Improvement District and such improvements are currently in operation; and $1 WHEREAS, the District's Board of Supervisors adopted a plan of dissolution for the 39 District transferring title to all property owned by the District to Collier County, including 33 the water management system; and 34 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 2002-27 35 creating the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit which permits the levy 36 of special assessments; and 37 WHEREAS, the Preliminary Assessment Roll for maintenance of the water 38 management system, beautification of recreational facilities and median areas, and 39 maintenance of conservation or preserve areas, and establishment of Capital Reserve Funds 40 for ambient noise management, maintenance of conservation or preserve areas, U.S. 41 41 berms, street signage replacements within the median areas and landscaping improvements 49 to U.S. 41 entrances, all within the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit 43 has been filed with the Clerk to the Board; and 163 1 A~£ND~ ~TEtl SEP - 9 2002 1 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners on July 30, 2002 adopted 2 Resolution No. 2002-315 fixing the date, time and place for the public hearing to approve 3 the Preliminary Assessment Roll and to adopt the Non-ad Valorem Assessment Roll to 4 utilize the uniform method of collection pursuant to Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes; 5 WHEREAS, said public hearing was duly advertised and regularly held. at The 6 Foundation Center, 8962 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida, commencing at 6:00 P.M. 7 on September 9, 2002. 8 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY 9 COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 10 SECTION ONE. The Board, having met to receive and consider the written objections of 11 the property owners and other interested persons appearing before the Board as to the 12 propriety and advisability of confirming and adopting the Pelican Bay Municipal Service 13 Taxing and Benefit Unit Preliminary Assessment roll, as to the amounts shown thereon to be 14 assessed against the lots and parcels of land to be benefited and as to the equalization of such 15 assessments on a basis of justice and right, does hereby confirm such Preliminary 16 Assessment Roll and make it final and adopt same as the final Non-ad Valorem Assessment 17 Roll for the purpose of using the uniform method of collection. 18 The total special assessment for maintenance of the water management system and 19 the beautification of the recreational areas and median areas, and maintenance of 20 conservation or preserve areas is $2,003,316.30 which equates to $258.02 per Equivalent 21 Residential Unit based on 7764.19 assessable units. 22 The total assessment for the establishment of Capital Reserve Funds for ambient 23 noise management, maintenance and restoration of the conservation or preserve areas, U.S. 24 41 berm improvements within the District, street sign replacement within the median areas. 25 landscaping improvements and U.S. 41 entrance improvements within the District, utilizing 26 an Equivalent Residential Unit based methodology. The total assessment for these Capital 27 ReserYe Funds for the maintenance and restoration and landscaping improvements is 28 $272,600.71 which equates to $35.11 per Equivalent Residential Unit based on 7764.19 29 assessable units. The total assessments against the benefited properties are described and set 30 forth in the Preliminary Assessment Roll (Non-ad Valorem Assessment Roll) attached hereto 31 as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein. The Board hereby confirms the special assessments 32 and the attached Exhibit "A" is the Final Assessment Roll (Non-ad Valorem Assessment 33 Roll). 34 SECTION TWO. Such assessments are hereby found and determined to be levied in direct 35 proportion to the special and positive benefits to be received by the properties listed in the sEp _ 9 2002 Preliminary Assessment Roll (Non-ad Valorem Assessment Roll), which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and are located within the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit 16J Unit which is described as follows: A tract of land being in portions of Sections 32 and 33, Township 48 South, Range 25 East; together with portions of Sections 4, 5, 8 and 9, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, being one and the same as the lands encompassed by the Pelican Bay Improvement District, the perimeter boundary of same more particularly described as follows: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Commencing at the Southeast comer of said Section 33; thence South 89 13 degrees 59 minutes 50 seconds West along the South line of Section 33 a 14 distance of 150.02 feet to a point on the West right-of-way line of U.S. 41 lfi (State Road 45), said point also being the Point of Beginning; thence 16 Southerly along the West right-of-way line of said U. S. 41 (State Road ~ 7 45) the following courses: South 00 degrees 58 minutes 36 seconds East 18 a distance of 2.49 feet; thence 'South 00 degrees 55 minutes 41 seconds 19 East a distance of 3218.29 feet; thence South 01 degrees 00 minutes 29 20 seconds East a distance of 3218.56 feet; thence South 00 degrees 59 21 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 2626.21 feet; thence South 01 22 degrees 00 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 2555.75 feet to a point 23 on the North right-of-way line of Pine Road as recorded in D.B. 50, Page 24 490, among the Public Records 6f said Collier County; thence departing 25 said U.S. 41 (State Road 45) South 89 degrees 09 minutes 45 seconds 26 West along said North right-of-way line a distance of 2662.61 feet; thence 27 South 00 degrees 51 minutes 44 seconds East a distance of 70.00 feet to a 28 point on the North line of Seagate Unit I as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 29 85 among said Public Records; thence South 89 degrees 09 minutes 45 30 seconds West along said North line of Seagate Unit I and the South line 31 of said Section 9 a distance of 2496.67 feet to the Southwest comer of 32 said Section 9; thence continue South 89 degrees 09 minutes 45 seconds 33 West a distance of 225 feet more or less to a point on the mean high water 34 line established May 15, 1968; thence a Northwesterly direction along 35 said mean high water line a distance 15716 feet more or less; thence 36 departing said mean high water line South 80 degrees 29 minutes 30 37 seconds East and along the Southerly line of Vanderbilt Beach Road 38 (State Road 862) as recorded in D.B. 15, Page 121 among said Public :39 Records a distance of 7385 feet more or less to a point on said West 40 right-of-way line of U. S. 41 (State Road 45); thence South 00 degrees 58 41 minutes 36 seconds East along said West right-of-way line a distance of 42 2574.36 feet to the Point of Beginning. SECTION THREE. Upon adoption of this Resolution any assessment may be paid at the 44 Office of the Clerk within thirty (30) days thereafter, all assessments shall be collected 45 pursuant to Sections 197.3632 and 197.3635, Florida Statutes, or any successor statutes authorizing the collection of such assessments on the same bill as Ad Valorem Taxes, which 47 shall be billed with the Ad Valorem Taxes that become payable on November 1, 2002 and 48 delinquent on April 1, 2003. 49 SECTION FOUR. The assessment shall be final and conclusive as to each lot or parcel 50 assessed and any objections against the making of any assessable improvements not so made 51 shall be considered as waived, and if any objection shall be made and overruled or shall not 52 be sustained, the adoption of this resolution approving the final assessment shall be the final 3 SEP - 9 ~g_ ,.~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 adjudication of the issues presented unless proper steps shall be taken in a court of competent jurisdiction to secure relief within twenty (20) days from the adoption of this Resolution. SECTION FIVE. All assessments shall constitute a lien upon the property so assessed from the date of confirmation of this Resolution of the same nature and to the same extent as the lien for general county taxes falling due in the same year or years in which such assessment falls due, and any assessment not paid when due shall be collected pursuant to Chapter 197, Florida Statutes, in the same manner as property taxes are collected. SECTION SIX. The Clerk is hereby directed to record this Resolution and all Exhibits attached hereto in the Official Records of Collier County. SECTION SEVEN. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage. This Resolution adopted this 9th day of September, 2002, after motion, second and majority vote. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 2O 21 22 Approved as to form and 23 legal sufficiency: 26 G 27~fivid Q. V~eigel 28 County Attorney 29 30 ~2 34 BY: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN 16J 1 ~GENDA IT~It . EP - 9 pELICAN BAY GULF OF M~E~CO AGENOA [TEt! S EP - 9 2002 Pg "'7 / 16J 1 Appropriation Unit DMsion Summary Pelican Bay Services 16J FY 00 01 FY 0102 FY 01,'02 FY 02/03 FY 02'03 FY 02/03 % Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Exp Rex- Budget Exp, Rev Service Service Budget Change Capital Improvement Program Water Management Communib' Beautification Street Lighting Securit?' Operations Clam Bay Restoration Total Operating Expenses Transfers Reserves Sub-Total Total Appropriations Revenues Transfers t 111) Ad Valorem Taxes Assessments Interest Misc. Contributions Carp,' Forward Transfers TDC Transfers t 109) Transfers { 778) Revenue Reserve Total Revenues Pem~anent Positions 1.132.886 1.250.000 1.399,200 502,700 466.160 574.600 518.400 574,100 1.096.35S 1.397.200 1.282.500 1,459,400 411.091 207.800 195.300 193,800 358.810 363.000 402.500 468,400 334.056 650.500 579.300 743,200 3.799.361 4.443.100 4.377.200 3,941,600 685.6,5 1.048.400 1.048.400 689,600 0 1.729.100 0 1,944,900 685.6'5 4.485.036 2.777.500 1.048.400 ;.__0.600 5,425.600 0 502,700 7.6% 0 574,100 8.7% 0 1,459,400 22.2% 0 193,800 2.9% 0 468,400 7.1% 0 743,200 11.3% 0 3,941,600 59.9% 0 689,600 10.5~ _9.6,o 0 1,944,900 ~ o,. 2,634.500 6,576,100 201.S00 113.800 113.800 436.200 526.750 617.000 583.600 647.700 2.101.201 2.2S0.600 2.150.500 2.275.900 36S.645 150. I00 280.600 148,000 11S.112 41.600 41.600 0 4.395.700 3.106.800 3.866.500 2.685.500 46.150 169.100 169.100 0 300.000 450.000 450.000 125.000 ,%.:00 455.400 455.400 414,500 0 1163.S00) 0 (156,700) .... 0.600 8.111.100 6.>/6.100 8.351.65S ~ ~' 20 22 20 20 0 2.634 500 40.1% 0 6.576,100 100.0% 0 436,200 6.6% 0 647,700 9.8% 0 2,275,900 34.6~ 0 148,000 2.3% 0 0 0.0% 0 2.685,500 40.8% 0 0 0.0% 0 125,000 1.9% 0 414.500 6.39~ 0 {156,700) -2.4% 0 6.576.100 100.001, 0 20 100.000 Pelican Bay - Water Management Pelican Bay Services (109) 16J 1 Mission Statement: To provide for the efficient and timely delivery of Water Management services to the Pelican Bay Community, by providing for the necessary maintenance for the community's storm water system to assure its efficient operation in the transporting and treatment of the storm water. In addition, the Division tries to maintain the highest aesthetic appearance while maintaining the delicate balance of the ecosystem. Total Less: Programs: Priority FTE's FY 03 Cost Revenues Net Cost Water Management Prom'am I 2.0 $574,100 $0 $574,100 Includes the routine maintenance of the Pelican Bay Water Management System of approximately 3.5 miles of berm separating the developed property from the Clam Pass System. The system functions as a storm water treatment facility by removing nutrients and pollutants, thus improving the quality of storm water before it is discharged into Clam Bay. Grand Total 2.0 $574,100 $0 $574,100 Performance Measures Actual FY 01 Forecast FY 02 Budget FY 03 Forty-three lakes maintained/treated - times per year 52 52 52 Aquatic plants planted 12,000 12.000 14.000 Water quality, testin~ - number of parameters 2,256 2.256 2.256 Appropriation Unit Personal Services Operating Expenses Capital Outlay Total Appropriations Permanent Positions FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY02/03 FY02/03 FY02/'03 Actual Adopted Forecast Cyrrent Expanded Total Budget Exp/Rev Budget Exp/Rev Service Service Budget Change 111,055 170,100 122,800 174,500 0 174.500 2.60% 314,393 379,700 370,800 385,300 0 385.300 1.50% 40,712 24,800 24,800 14,300 0 14.300 -42.30% 466,160 574,600 518,400 574,100 0 574.100 -0.10% 2 2 2 2 0 2 0.00% Forecast FY 01/02 - Personal Services decreased due to an employee out on Worker's Compensation. Cnrrent FY 02/03 - Capital outlay includes one-third of the costs for the following items: office equipment ($4,000), improvements to the maintenance garages and the stormwater drainage at the maintenance site ($6,600t and 100°0 of the cost of a new boat and motor I,$3,700). Revenue FY 03 - The assessment rate for water management is $63.74 per equivalent residential unit i, ERU). The FY 02 assessment rate was $69.65. /he decrease per ERU is $5.91 or 8.5%. Pelican Bay - Community Beautification Department Pelican Bay Services (109) Mission Statement: To provide for the high qualit?' maintenance of the right-of-way, berms and parks within the Pelican Bay community to ensure an efficient and consistent system in accordance with the standards set bv the community. Pro~zrams: Total Less: Priority FTE's FY 03 Cost Revenues Net Cost Beautification Prom'am 1 17.0 $1,459,400 $0 $1.459,400 Include the routine maintenance of 2.873.750 square feet of right-of-way and communiD' parks - including pruning, cutting, pesticide and fertilizer programs. Also annuals are changed twice per year and mulch is applied to 661,750 square feet of plant beds three times per year. The Beautification Department is also responsible for street sweeping, street trash pick-up. the beach cleaning program and a sign maintenance program which includes traffic and entrance signs. Grand Total 17.0 $1,459,400 $0 SI.459,400 Performance Measures Actual FY 01 Forecast FY 02 Budget FY 03 Irrigation systems checked - times per 3'ear 12 12 12 Chemical weed control - times per 3ear 24 24 24 Fertilizer applied - times per year 3 3 3 Streets swept - times per .,,'ear 12 12 12 Beach raked - times per 5'ear 41 52 52 Flmver plantings - times per 3ear 2 2 2 Mulch application - times per 7ear 3 3 3 3 Pelican Bay- Community Beautification Department (Cont.) Pelican Bay Services (109) Appropriation Unit FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 02/03 FY 02/03 FY 02/03 % Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Exp Rev Budget Exp/Rev Service Service Budget Change Personal Services 562,757 818,100 637,500 730,200 0 730,200 -10.7% Operating Expenses 460,086 478,800 544,700 681,600 0 681,600 42.4% Capital Outlay 73,515 100,300 100,300 47,600 0 47,600 -52.5% Total Appropriations 1.096,358 1,397,200 1,282,500 1,459,400 0 1,459,400 4.5% Permanent Positions 18 17 17 17 0 17 0.0% Forecast FY 01/02 - The Pelican Bay Services Division uses both temporary labor and permanent full-time positions in the maintenance program. Forecast personal services reflect the use of temporary laborers paid in operating expenses. Current FY 02/03 - Workers Compensation charges decreased $78,400 based on the new methodology to allocate charges on actual loss experience. Prindipal increases in operating expenses include effluent xvater use charges - $59,500; contracted labor of S30,200; mulch - $9,000; and $62,100 in operating supplies used to prevent the intrusion of roots under sidewalks. Capital outlay includes one-third of the costs for the following items: office equipment (S4,100), improvements to the maintenance garages and the stormwater drainage at the maintenance site (S6,800), and 100% of the cost of new moxvers and a new sprayer (536,700). Revenue FY 02/03 - The assessment rate for Right-of-Way Beautification is $194.28 per equivalent residential unit. The FY 02 assessment rate was $177.46. The increase per ERU is $16.82 or 9.5%. 4 Pelican Bay - Pelican Bay Services Summary (109) Appropriation Unit FY 00,01 FY 01/02 FY 01 02 FY 02/03 FY 02,,;03 FY 02/03 % Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Exp Rex' Budget Exp/Rev Service Service Budget Change Water Management Community Beautification Total Operating Expenses Transfers Transfer (322) Reserve- SalaD' Adjustment Reset-es Sub-Total Total Appropriations 466.160 574.600 518.400 574,I00 0 574,100 -0.1% 1.096.35S 1.397,200 1.2S2.500 1.459.400 0 1,459,400 4.5% 1,562.518 1.971.800 I.S00.900 2.033.500 0 2,033,500 3.1% 56.148 94,500 94.500 102.900 0 102,900 8.9% 300.000 450.000 450.000 125.000 0 125,000 -72.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 433.700 0 544.300 0 544,300 25.5% 356.148 978,200 544.500 772.200 0 772,200 -21.1% 1.9!8.666 2.950,000 2.345.400 2.805.700 0 2,805,700 -4.9% Revenue: Assessments 1.734,184 1.919.900 1 .S08.800 2.003.300 0 2.003,300 4.3% Interest Misc. 183.972 53,000 43,300 65.600 0 65,600 23.8% Carry Fom'ard 1.336.000 1.088.200 1 ...... 00 842.200 0 842.200 -22.6% Reimbursen~ents 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Revenue Reserve 0 (111.100) 0 1105.400) 0 (105,400) -5.1% Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Revenue 3.254.156 2.950.000 3.187.600 2.805.700 0 2.805.700 -4.9% Permanent Positions 19 19 19 19 0 19 0.0% Revenue FY 02/03 - The combined FY 03 assessment rate for water management and community beautification is 525S.02 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). The FY 02 combined assessment rate was 5247.11. The increase per equivalent residential unit is 510.91 or 4.4 °o. Pelican Bay - Security Operations Pelican Bay Services (110) Mission Statement: To provide additional security to the Pelican Bay area. 16J Programs: Security Pro,am Provides one full-time (24 hours per day; seven days per week) SherifFs Deputy for Pelican Bay through a contractual arrangement with the Collier County SherifFs Office. Reserves Total Prioritv FTE's FY 03 Cost Less: Revenues 1 0.0 $468,400 Net Cost 2 0.0 $23,900 $0 468,400 $0 $78,900 Grand Total Appropriation Unit FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 Actual Adopted Forecast Exp/Rev Budget Exp/Rev 0.0 $492,300 FY 02/03 FY 02 03 Current Expanded Service Service SO $492,300 FY 02/03 % Total Budget Budget Change Operating Expenses 349,920 363~,000 402,500 Capital Outlay 8,890 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 Reserves 0 138,500 0 Total Appropriations 358,810 501,500 402,500 492,300 397;900 0 397,900 9.6% 70,500 0 70,500 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 23,900 0 23,900 -82.7% 0 492,300 -1.8% Revenue: Transfer from (778) 293,300 355,400 355,400 389,500 Interest/Misc. 20,440 7,600 7,600 8,400 Carry. Forward 179,000 138,500 133,900 94,400 Revenue Reserve 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue 492,740 501,500 496,900 492,300 0 389,500 9.6% 0 8,400 10.5% 0 94,400 -31.8% 0 0 N/A 0 492,300 -1.8% Pemmnent Positions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Forecast FY 02/03 - Forecast expenses include $39,500 to replace two patrol cars damaged in accidents. The $39,500 represents the difference between the cost of the new vehicles and the proceeds received from the insurance company. Current FY 02/03 - Operating expenses have been increased to reflect increases in the Sheriffs personnel costs. Capital outlay is for the replacement of three patrol vehicles. Revenue FY 02/03 - Security operations are funded through ad valorem taxes, which are collected in the Street Lighting Fund (778) and transferred to the Security Operations Fund (110). 6 Pelican Bay- Community Beautification Uninsured Asset Restoration Reserve Pelican Bay Services (133) 16J Mission Statement: To provide for the restoration of the Pelican Bay landscaping into its original premier state in the event of a natural disaster. Programs: Restoration Pro_oram Provides for the restoration of the Pelican Bay landscaping into its original prermer state in the event of a natural disaster. Total Less: Priority FTE's FY 03 Cost Revenues Net Cost 1 0.0 S1.197,000 $0 51,197,000 Grand Total 0.0 S1,197.000 0 S1.197,000 Appropriation Unit FY0001 FY01.02 FY01:02 FY 02, 03 FY 02, 03 FY0203 % Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Exp Rex' Budget Exp, Rex' Sen'ice Sen'ice Budget Change Operating Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Reset'es 0 1.105.500 0 1.197.000 0 1,197,000 8.3% Total Appropriations 0 I. 105.500 0 1.197.000 0 1.197.000 8.3°/3 Revenue: Assessments 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Interest Misc. 86.55S 52.800 52.800 57.100 0 57.100 8.1% Transfer [ 109) 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Carryforward 1.003.500 1,055.300 1,090.000 1.142,800 0 1,142,S00 8.3% Revenue Reserve 0 12,6001 0 (2,900/ 0 (2,900) 11.5% Total Revenue 1,090.05S 1,105.500 1.142.800 1.197,000 0 1,197,000 8.3% Current Fl' 02/03 - The reser~'e amount is analyzed on an annual basis to ensure that the current reserves are sufficient to fund the restoration of the landscaping in the event of a natural disaster. Pelican Bay - Clam Bay Restoration Pelican Bay Services (320) 16J I Mission Statement: To provide funding for the restoration and maintenance of the Clam Bay estuary system. The remainder of the construction projects is funded in a umque parmership with WCI Communities, LP whereby they match Pelican Bay funds dollar-for- dollar up to $1,000,000. The on-going monitoring program is funded through the Unincorporated Area General Fund in a joint effort with Pelican Bay to comply x~4th permit requirements and to help ensure the health of this umque ecosystem. Programs: Restoration Proeram Includes the yearly monitoring and on-going studies outlined in the "Clam Bay Restoration & Management Plan" and completion of the construction program initiated in FY99. Reselwes Total Less: Priority FTE's FY03 Cost Revenues Net Cost 0.0 $743,300 $0 $743,300 0.0 $0 $0 $0 Grand Total 0.0 $743,300 $0 S743,300 Pelican Bay - Clam Bay Restoration (Cont.) Pelican Bay (320) 160 Appropriation Unit FY 00/01 FY 01,.'02 FY 01,"02 FY 02,/03 FY 02,,'03 FY 02/03 % Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Exp/Rev Budget ExpRev Service Service Budget Change Project Expenses Transfers Transfer (109) Reserves Total Appropriation Revenue: Transfer MSTD (111) Assessments Contributions Interest/Misc. Transfer TDC Carryfor~vard Revenue Reserve Total Revenue 334,056 650,500 579.300 743,200 0 743,200 14.3% 0 3,200 3.200 100 0 100 -96.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 334,056 6>o./00 582.500 /4o,o00 0 201,800 113.800 113,800 436,200 0 0 64.900 61.500 2.400 0 118.112 41.600 41.600 0 0 21,237 6.500 7.500 0 0 46,150 169,100 169,100 0 0 440.600 261.200 493,800 304,800 0 0 (3,400) 0 (100) 0 827,899 653.700 887.300 743,300 0 743,300 13.7% 436,200 283.3% 2,400 -96.3% 0 -100.0% 0 -100.0% 0 -100.0% 304,800 16.7% (100) -97.1% /43,000 --o, Current FY 02/03 - Budgeted programs include the following: Biological Monitoring Hydrographic Monitoring Water Quali~' testing Program Interior Channel Maintenance Water Quality Report Exotic Removal Hydrographic Study/Improvements Plantings to Replace Cattails Dune Restoration Interior Channel Mapping Interior Channel Design Construction Die-off Area Planting Management Report Restoration Consultant Services Miscellaneous Operating Costs Total 530.350 543.500 53.900 S20.000 53.000 S18.000 562.000 5160.000 5105.000 530.000 530.000 Sl05.000 S24.950 $80.000 527.500 5743.200 Revenue FY 02/03 - There is a budgeted transfer of 5436,200 from the Unincorporated Area General Fund {I 11) for monitoring and maintenance activities in the Clam Bay System. The BCC made a policy decision to fund Clam Bay maintenance in FY 00. In addition, the restoranon work is funded with available carD'tbrward revenue and an FY 03 assessment of S2.400. The assessment rate is S0.31 per equivalent residential unit. -- 9 Pelican Bay - Capital Improvement Program Pelican Bay Services (322) Mission Statement: To up~ade community, infrastructure including the replacement of the street lighting system, irrigation system, and renovation of the community, roadxvay landscaping system and the U.S. 41 berm. In a joint effort with Collier County Transportation, there is funding for a portion of U.S. 41 landscaping improvements. Pro,rams: Capital Improvement Program Capital improvements include landscaping and irrigation improvements (Pelican Bay Rights-of-Way and Phase I Tram Road). Reserves/Transfers Total Less: Priority FTE's FY03 Cost Revenues Net Cost 0.0 $502,700 $0 $502,700 0.0 $136,000 $0 5136,000 Grand Total 0.0 $638,700 $0 S638,700 Appropriation Unit FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 02/03 FY 02/03 FY 02/03 % Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Exp/Rev Budget Exp/Rev Service Service Budget Change Project Expenses 1,132,886 1,250,000 1,399,200 502.700 0 502,700 -59.8% Transfers 11,876 14,500 14,500 13,900 0 13,900 -4.1% Reserves 0 0 0 122,100 0 122,100 N/A Total Appropriations 1.144~762 1,264,500 1,413,700 638,700 0 638,700 -49.5% Revenue: Interests'Misc. 29,203 25,400 164,500 10,600 0 10,600 -58.3% Assessments 367,017 295,800 280,200 270,200 0 270,200 -8.7% Transfers (778) 0 100,000 100,000 25,000 0 25,000 -75.0% Transfer (109) 300,000 450.000 450,000 125,000 0 125,000 -72.2% Canyforward 1.089,600 408,900 641,100 222,100 0 222.100 -45.7% Revenue Reserve 0 (15,600) 0 (14,200) 0 (14.200) -9.0% Total Revenue 1.785,820 1,264,500 1,635,800 638,700 0 638,700 -49.5% Forecast FY 01/02 - The additional 5149,200 in forecast project expenses was for encumbrances (purchase orders) carried forward from the prior fiscal year. Current FY 02/03 - Budgeted capital project expenses include the following: U.S. 41 Median Landscaping - $327,500 Plant Materials {Rights of Way and Phase I Tram Road $105.000 Engineering Fees $5,000 Mulch and Other Operating Supplies $65,200 Total $502,700 Revenue FY 02/03 - The capital projects are funded with available $222,100 in carryforward revenue, a $125.000 transfer from the Pelican Bay Services Fund (109), a $25.000 transfer from the Street Lighting Fund (778), and a FY 03 assessment of $270,200 ($34.80 per equivalent residential unit as compared to the $38.12 FY 02 assessment per ERU). 10 Pelican Bay - Street Lighting Pelican Bay Services (778) 163 Mission Statement: To maintain the Pelican Bay Street Lighting System as a well-balanced functional system that provides a consistently lighted roadway appearance within the community.. Programs: Street Li?.3ting Pro.am Includes the routine maintenance of the Pelican Bay roadway street lighting system including all up- lighting at the Pelican Bay entrances and bike path lighting. Street Lights consist of concrete poles and metal Haliade lamps. Transfer to Security/Capital Improvements Reserves/Transfers Total Less: Priority FTE's FY 03 Cost Revenues Net Cost I 1.0 $193,800 $0 $193,800 2 0.0 $414,500 $0 $414,500 3 0.0 $90,800 $0 $90,800 Grand Total 1.0 S699,100 $0 $699,100 Performance Measures Actual FY 01 Forecast FY 02 Budget FY 03 Lights repaired within 24 hours 100% 100% 100% Light posts inspected 26 26 26 Light poles installed 17 0 0 Sidewalk lig. hts installed 38 0 0 Appropriation Unit Pelican Bay - Street Lighting (Cont.) Pelican Bay Services (778) 16,1 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 02/03 FY 02/03 FY 02/03 % Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Exp/Rev Budget Exp/Rev Service Service Budget Change Personal Services 57,597 85,800 67,300 71,800 0 71,800 -16.3% Operating Expenses 77,731 94,900 100,900 109,200 0 109,200 15.1% Capital Outlay 275.763 27,100 27,100 12,800 0 12,800 -52.8% Reserves 0 51,400 0 57,600 0 57,600 12.1% Transfer (322) 293,300 100,000 100,000 25,000 0 25,000 -75.0% Transfer to Security 0 355,400 355,400 389,500 0 389,500 9.6% Transfers - Elected Officials 24,351 30,800 30,800 33,200 0 33,200 7.8% Total Appropriations 728.742 745,400 681,500 699,100 0 699,100 -6.2% Revenue: Ad Valorem Taxes 526.750 617,000 583,600 647,700 0 647,700 5.0% Interest/Misc. 27.235 4,800 4,900 6,300 0 6.300 31.3% Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Carry. Forward 347,000 154,700 172,200 79,200 0 79,200 -48.8% Revenue Reserve 0 (31, 100) 0 (34,100) 0 (34,100) 9.6% Total Revenue 900.985 745,400 760,700 699,100 0 69%100 -6.2% Permanent Positions I 1 1 1 0 1 0.0% Current FY 02/03 - Operating expenses include a $4,900 increase in electricity and a $9,800 increase m contracted electrical repairs. Capital outlay includes one-third of the cost of the following items: office equipment ($4,000), improvements to the maintenance garage and stormwater drainage at the maintenance facility site ($6,600), and street pole replacement ($2,200). _. 16J PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR TEN (10) MONTHS ENDING JULY 31, 2002 GENERAL FUNDS Prorated Water Community Street TotaIRev/Exp F.Y. 2002 Jul-02 Favorable Management Beautification Lights Security Thru July Budget Budget Unfavorable Revenue Interest Income $6.416 $41,870 $8.394 $6,906 Plan Review Fee Income $ 100 $0 $0 $0 lnterfund Transfers $0 $0 $0 $0 Miscellaneous lncome $179 $12,487 $1.275 $0 Assessment or Ad-Valorem Tax Levy. $527,608 $1,334.439 $213.049 $383,058 Unappropriated Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Revenue $534,303 $1,388,795 $222,719 $389,964 Other Fees & Charges Property Appraiser $7.737 Tax Collector $8.716 Revenue Reserve $0 Total Other Fees & Charges NET REVENUE][ Appropriations - Personal Services Personal Services - Admin. Personal Services- Field Total Personal Services $20.144 $3.043 $5,464 $22.647 $7,074 $12,752 $0 $0 $0 SI6,453 S42,791 $10,117 $18,216 S517,850 $1,346,005 $212,602 $371,748 $38.153 $35.258 $29.854 n/a $63.507 $605.683 $22.952 n/a $101,661 S640,941 $52,805 $0 Appropriations - Operations Administration Indirect Cost Reimbursements Other Contractual Services Telephone - Service Contracts Yelephone - Direct Line Postage. Freight & Ups Rent- Buildings Rent- Equipment t.ea.se Purchase Dell Computers Insurance - General Data Processing - R&M Printing or Binding - Outside Vendors Clerks Recording Fees. Etc. l,cgal Advertising Office Supplies - General Copying Charges Minor ()fficc Equipment Computer Software Other Training & Educational Exp. Other Operating Supplies l'otal Administration $143.000 $0 $10.500 n/a $15.329 $22.189 $13.200 Wa $296 $296 $221 n/a!~ $2.599 $2.599 $1.157 n/ai~ $732 $687 $489 n/a $6.483 $6.680 $6.483 n/a $714 $714 $714 n/al! $835 $0 $0 n/a $4.000 $600 $500 n/a $0 $0 $0 n/a $247 $247 $0 n/a~' $200 $0 $0 n/a~ $0 $0 $0 Wa! $1.410 $1.559 $388 n/ai $0 $0 $0 n/al $81 $81 $0 n/a~ $0 $0 $0 n/ai $0 $0 $0 n/al $320 $320 $320 n/al! $176,247 S35,972 $33,972 $0 Field Services Engineering & Consultants Berm & Swale Maintenance Water Quali~ Testing Plan Review Services Water Use Charges $15.130 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a~ $14.280 $0 $0 n/a~ $0 $0 $0 n/a, $0 $33.593 $0 n/a:a $63,587 $60.400 $50.333 $13.253 $100 $5,000 $4.167 ($4.067) $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,941 $0 $13.941 $0 $2,458,154 $2,536,900 $2.458.155 (51/ $0 $264.351 $0 50 $2,535,781 $2,866,651 $2,526.595 S9,185 $36,388 $50,700 $36,388 S0 $51,189 $74,600 $51.189 $0 $0 $144.200 $0 $0 $87,577 $269,500 $87.577 SO $2,448,204 $2.597,151 $2,439.019 $9.185 I{ $103.265 $120.000 $100.000 ($3.265, $692.142 $864.000 $720.000 $27.858 $795,407 $984,000 S820,000 $24.593 $153,500 $153.500 $153.500 $0 $50,718 $69.000 $57.500 $6.782 $813 $2.000 $1.667 $854 $6,354 $7.000 $5.833 ($521) $1,907 $13.000 $10.833 $8.926 $19.646 $23.900 $19.917 $270 $2.143 $3,900 $3.250 $1.107 $835 $1.100 $917 $81 $5,100 $5.100 $4.250 ($850) $0 $900 $750 $750 $495 $4.000 $3.333 $2.839 $200 $4.000 $3.333 $3.133 $0 $6.000 $5.000 $5.000 $3,358 $3.500 $2.917 ($441) $0 $1.400 $1.167 $1.167 $162 $600 $500 $338 $0 $300 $250 $25O $0 $400 $333 $333 $959 $400 $333 ($626) S246,190 S300,000 S275.583 $29.393 $15.130 $15.651 $13.042 ($2.088) $0 $5.000 $4.167 $4.167 $14.280 $13.900 $11.583 ($2.697) $0 $5.000 $4.167 $4.167 $33.593 $35,500 $29.583 ($4.009) Page I COLLIER COUNTY PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR TEN (10) MONTHS ENDING JULY 31, 2002 16J 1 GENERAL FUNDS Water Community Management Beautification Replanting Program $0 $ ! 2.90 I Other Contractual Services $35,073 $108,416 Motor Pool Rental $0 $117 Cellular Telephone $768 $970 Postage, Freight & Ups $0 $46 Electricity $0 $854 Trash & Dumpster Fees $2.919 $19.778 Rent Equipment $480 $6.576 Insurance General $2.000 $9,500 Auto Insurance $2.800 $5.500 Sprinkler System Maintenance $0 $16.017 Maintenance - Landscaping $0 $26.996 Autos & Trucks R&M Outside Vendor $0 $0 Fleet Maintenance - Labor $0 $5.721 Fleet Maintenance - Parts $163 $5,479 Fleet Maint. Non ISF $0 $500 Boat R&M $0 $0 Other Equipment R&M $0 $ I, 198 Printing - Outside Vendors $0 $164 Photo Processing $0 $0 Licenses & Permits $328 $1.274 Copying Charges $0 $25 Unilbrm Rental $950 $3,434 Chemicals $38.336 $26.782 Fuel & Lubricants - Outside $0 $0 Fuel & Lubricants - Inside $ I. 133 $11.53 I Minor Operating Equipment $0 $4.039 Other Training & Educational $0 $689 Other Operating Supplies $ 1.856 $66.169 Total Field SerMces $116,217 $368,269 Capital Outlay Capital Expenditures $8.603 Total Capital Outlay $8,603 Security Pcrsonal Services ()thor Contractual Services Total Securiq' Operations Street Lights $0 $3,914 $0 $948 $0 $15.468 $0 $0 $900 $1,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12.988 $36338 Total Rev/Exp Security Thru July r n/a i~ $12.901 n/a:~ $147.404 n/a~ $117 n/a i! $2.686 n/ai $46 n/al! $16.322 n/a 7'i~ $22.697 n/a ~ $7.056 n/a $12.400 n/a $10.100 n/a $16.017 n/a: $26.996 n/a!:i $0 n/ai $5.721 n/a ~ $5.642 n/a ~ $500 n/ai~ $0 n/a $1.518 n/a $164 n/a $0 n/a $1.601 n/a }~ $25 ~a~-~ $4.385 n/a .r~ $12.663 n/a .~ $4.039 n/a~ $689 ~a ! $8~.0~3 so i! $66.598 $6.893 $0 $66,598 S6,893 S0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ~: $0 $0 $0 $226.544 ~ S0 $0 S0 $226~n144 ,~,i To'r.~u~ APPROPRIATIONS[I S402,727 Net Ineome from Operations Fund Balance !ti' 10/1/01 I:und Balance ~, July 31, 2002 $1,111,780 S130,008 $226,544 Fund Balance Allocations Reserved lbr Operations Reserved for Capital Outla5 Prorated F.Y. 2002 Jul-02 Favorable Budget Budget Unfavorable $42,300 $35.250 $22.34~ $288.900 $240.750 $93.346 $300 $250 $133 $2,000 $1~667 {$1.01% $200 $167 $121 $26.600 $22,167 $5.845 $15,100 $12.583 1510.114~ $9,400 $7.833 $12,300 $10.250 (S2.150~ $10,100 $8,417 ($1.6831 $17,600 $14,667 (Sl.3511 $44,200 $36,833 S9.83' $1.100 $917 $917 $7,900 $6.583 $862 $12,300 $10,250 S4.608 $2,400 $2.000 Sl.500 $500 $417 $417 $2.700 $2.250 $732 $0 $0 ($1641 $200 $167 $167 $700 $583 {$1.0181 $0 $0 $9.200 $7.667 $3.282 SI12,100 $93,417 S28.299 $700 $583 $583 $13,800 $11.500 151.1631 $3,200 $2.667 151.372t $1.200 $1.000 $311 $56.500 $47.083 {$33.929~ $520,824 $768,551 $640,459 SI19,660 S82.094 $152.2011 $126.833 $44.740 S82,094 $152,200 $126,833 S44,740 $115.123 $234.224 $82.593 $145.204 $456.600 $429.000 $72.20{) $133.900 $571,723 $663,224 S!54,793 $279,104 $507.323 $511.724 $151.393 $275.104 :~ $1.445.544 $368.000 $64.40{) $151.5011 $3.400 $4.000 ~2 $223.300 $223.300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $226.544 $402.500 $335.417 $108.873 S226,544 $402~00 $335,417 $108,873 SI,871,060 $2,607,251 $2,198,292 S327,258 $577.144 ($10.1001 $24{).727 $336.443 $1.091.700 $1.349.400 SI,668,844 $1339300 Notes: Fund Balance at 10/I/01 (actual) includes Reserve for Encumbrances of$15.050.50 FY 2002 tlnappropriatcd Fund Balance Budget includes $15.050.50 o1' Rolled Encumbrances and a $39.500 Budget Amendment in Sccurit> Page 2 16J COLLIER COUNTY PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR TEN (10) MONTHS ENDING JULY 31, 2002 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Prorated Clam Bay Uninsured lrr. & Land. Total Rev/Exp F.Y. 2002 Jul-02 System Assets Analysis Thru July Budget Budget Revenue Developer Contributions - WC! $37,045 Interest Income $8,974 Miscellaneous Income $21 lnterfund Transfers $282,900 Assessment or Ad-Valorem Tax Levy $62,943 Unappropriated Fund Balance $0 Total Revenue $391,883 Other Fees & Charges Property Appraiser $942 Tax Collector $239 Revenue Reserve $0 Total Other Fees & Charges $1,182 NET $390,702 Appropriations: Engineering & Consultants Other Services Capital Outlay TOTAL APPROPRIATIONSII Net Income from Operations Fund Balance ~ 10/1/01 (Actual) Fund Balance (~ July 31, 2002 Fund Balance Allocations Reserved for Operations Reserved for Capital Outlay $0 $0 $33,569 $10,184 $0 $63,847 $0 $55O,O0O $0 $286,887 $0 $0 $33,569 $910,918 $0 $4,296 $0 $4,831 $o $o $0 $9,126 $33,569 $901,792 $139,452 n/a $2,410 $190,841 Wa $588,102 $0 $0 $237.490 $330,292 $0 $828,002 $60.410 $33.569 $73,789 $493.800 $1.090,000 $641,100 Favorable Unfavorable $37,045 41,600 $34,667 $2.378 $52,727 84,700 $70,583 ($17,857) $63,868 0 $0 $63,868 $832,900 832,900 $832,900 $0 $349,830 360,700 $349,807 $24 $0 1,056,832 $0 $0 $1336370 $2376,732 $1,287,957 $48,413 $5,238 $7,200 $5,238 $0 $5,070 $10,500 $5,070 $0 $0 $19,000 $0 $0 $10308 $36,700 $10308 $1326,062 $2340,032 $1,277,649 $0 $48,413 $141,862 $348,013 $290,011 $148,150 $778,943 $1,747.904 $1,456,587 $677,644 $237.490 $244.1|4 $203.428 ($34.062) $1,158,295 $2340,032 $1,950,026 $791,732 ($672,378) $167,767 $0 $2,224,900 $1,725.400 $554,210 $1,123,569 $714,889 $2392,667 $1,725,400 $554.210 $0 $714,889 $1,269.099 $0 $0 $1,123,569 $0 $1,123,569 $1.108,100 $840,145 Notes: Fund Balance At I 0/I/01 { Actual) includes Reserve for Encumbrances of $439,531.66 F.Y. 2002 Budget for Unappropriated Fund Balance Includes $439,531.66 in Rolled Encumbrances. Page 3 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION CLAM BAY RESTORATION FUND JULY 31, 2002 16J EXPENDITURES Environmental Consult. Engineering Fees Akerman, Senterfitt, et. al. Lewis Environmental Serv. Tackney & Associates Wilson. Miller, et. al. Dr. Samuel Snedcker Hilburn Hilstad Turrell Other Expenditures F.Y.'s 97-99 F.Y. 2000 F.Y. 2001 F.Y. 2002 Total Exp. Actual Budget Budget Budget Budget To Date $0 $207,683 $78,732 $86,500 $67.675 $9.997 $10,550 $49.238 $41.009 $0 $58,040 $174,653 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,522 $7,245 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,701 $4,562 $0 $39.472 $146,324 $188,700 $232,693 $207,683 $78,732 $86,500 $76,442 $9,997 $10,550 $66,500 $415,505 $148.203 $207,683 $78,732 $86,500 $76,442 $9.997 $10.550 $66.500 $403.896 Balance $84.490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11.609 July 2002 Expenses $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o S0 $0 $14.736 Sub-Total Tidal Creeks 1,2 & 3 Engineering Construction Tackncy Turrell Agnoli. Barber & Bmndagc Engineering Design Tackney Turrell Agnoli. Barber & Brundage Capital Improvements $551384 $53,695 $216,170 $363,353 $0 $0, $0 $0 $57.101 $1,899 $0 $0 $2,796 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,790 $0 $0 $0 $11,596 $0 $0 $0 $134.830 $51,183 $0 $0 $1,184,603 $0 $59,ooo $2,796 $o $26.79o $11,596 $186.Ol3 $1,088,503 $0 $59,000 $2,796 $o $26.790 $11,596 $186.013 $96,099 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,736 Sub-Total $233,113 $53,082 $0 Clam Pass Main Channel Engineering Construction Tackney $0 $0 $0 Turrell $74.291 $4.709 $0 Agnoli. Barber & Bmndagc $5.900 $0 $0 Engineering Design Tackney $0 $0 $0 Turrell $24.980 $0 $0 Agnoli. Barber & Bmndage $ I 0,000 $0 $0 Snedaker $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $251,530 $0 $0 $0 $286,195 $286,195 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 $79.000 $0 $5,900 $5,91)0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24.98(I $24.980 $0 $10.000 $10.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $251.530 $251.530 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o $o Sub-Total Interior Tidal Creeks Engineering Construction WMB&P Turrell $366,701 $4,709 $0 $0 $10.990 $0 $1.503 $1.497 $0 $0 $371,410 $371,410 $0 $10.990 $10.990 $0 $3.000 $3.000 $0 $0 Page I PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION CLAM BAY RESTORATION FUND JULY 31, 2002 F.Y.'s 97-99 F.Y. 2000 F.Y. 2001 F.Y. 2002 Total Exp. Actual Budget Budget Budget Budget To Date Balance $17.450 $14,350 $0 $0 $31,800 $31,800 $0 $5.804 $6,816 $0 $0 $12~620 $12,620 $0 $27.409 $59,110 $27,692 $0 $114.211 $114,211 $0 $25.500 $47.478 $47.398 $0 $120.376 $120.376 $0 July 2002 Expenses EXPENDITURES Interior Tidal Creeks Engineering Design Lewis Environmental WMB&P Engineering Consultants Lewis Environmental Capital Improvements Sub-Total $77,666 $140,241 $75,090 $0 $292,997 $292,997 $0 Seagate Culverts Engineering Construction WMB&P $0 $8,07 ! $0 $0 $8,071 $8,071 $0 Engineering Design WMB&P $9.108 $3,277 $0 $0 $12,385 $12.385 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $88.240~ $0 $0 $88.240 $88.240 $0 Sub-Total $9,108 $99,588 $0 $0 $108,696 $108,696 $0 Ecosystem Enhancements Environmental Consultants $0 $3.750 $0 $ l 10.700 $ 114.450 $53.038 $6 i.412 $2.692 Other Contractual Serv. $0 $0 $25.198 $262.600 $287.798 $38,948 $248.850 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $8.250 $0 $8.250 $8.250 $0 $0 Sub-Total $0 $3,750 $33,448 $373,300 $410,498 $100,236 $310,261 $2,692 $0 $0 $16.980 $3.020 $20.000 $16.980 $3.020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26.455 $56,045 $0 $0 $82.500 $82,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $38.817 $6.624 $45.441 $38.817 $6.624 Fresh/Stormwater Analysis Engineering Fees Environmental Consult. Fees l'urrcll & Associates Other Contractual Serv. Operating Supplies Capital Improvements Sub-Total $26,455 $56,045 $55,797 $9,644 $147,941 $138,297 $9,644 Capital Outlay Improvements General $15.459 $0 $950 $0 $16.409 $16,409 $0 Other MachineD' & Equip. $4.727 $13.986 $0 $0 $18.713 $18.713 $0 Sub-Total $20.186 $13,986 $950 $0 $35,122 $35,122 $0 Other Fees & Charges l~x Collector $23.041 $0 $0 $1.300 $24.341 $23.280 $1.061 Properly Appraiser $8.637 $0 $0 $1.900 $10.537 $9.579 $958 Revenue Reserve $0 $0 $0 $3.400 $3.400 $0 $3.400 Sub-Total $31,678 $0 $0 $6,600 $38,278 $32,860 $5,418 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS ] $1.316,291 $425,096 $381,454 $752,897 $2,875,739 $2,454,316 $421,422 $17,430 Rolled Encumbrances which are included in Total Approp. [ $95,797 Page 2 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION CLAM BAY RESTORATION FUND JULY 31, 2002 1 EXPENDITURES F.Y.'s 97-99 F.Y. 2000 F.Y. 2001 F.Y. 2002 Total Exp. Actual Budget Budget Budget Budget To Date Balance ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DATE INV. NO. AMOUNT Agnoli, Barber & Brundage 06/28/02 12890 $2,584.25 Ecosystem Technologies 07/19/02 1766 $6,688.00 Floraquatics 07/15/02 100513 $3,900.00 Nations Rent 07/19/02 36-1060082 $150.00 Nations Rent 07/23/02 35-1068619 $162.00 Nations Rent 07/23/02 35-1068615 $138.00 Nations Rent 08/05/02 36-1063584 $216.00 The Equipment Bookie 07/23/02 11046 $891.85 Turrell & Associates 06/30/02 10 $12,750.93 TOTAL INVOICES $27,481.03 [NOTE: WC! THRU 7/31/02 WCI: BILLED TO DATE WCI: PAID TO DATE $985,595.34 $981,356.16 July 2002 Expenses Page 3 16J COLLAR COUNTY GOVERNMENT Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive · Suite 605 ° Naples, Florida 34108 ° (239) 597-1749 * Fax (239) 597-4502 August 29, 2002 Mr. Edward J. Kant, P.E. Transportation Operations Director 2705 S. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Dear Mr. ~.~'~~ The P~ican Bay Services Division Board sincerely appreciates the time and assistance that was provided by you and your staff to the Pelican Bay community in undertaking a resolution to the issues relating to the Pelican Bay sidewalk safety improvements, pedestrian crossings and the repaving of Gulf Park Drive. Your efforts and those of your staff are to be commended for the manner in which you and your staff handled the desires of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board and the residents of Pelican Bay. Again, thank you and if the Pelican Bay Services Division can be of any assistance in the future, please do not hesitate to contact us. In the meantime, I remain Yours sincerely, PELICAN BAY .~F/.RVICES DIVISON James P. Ward .;';-~c Department Director JPW/bcs cc: Pelican Bay Services Division Board COIJ]ER COUNTY GOVERN .ic° ' .I.g ..-- Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive · Suite 605 · Naples, Florida 34108 ° (239) 597-1749 ° Fax'(239) 597-4502 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CLAM BAY SUB- COMMITTEE AT THE PERICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION FIELD OFFICE, 6200 WATERGATE WAY, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2002 AT 8:00 A.M. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of the July 17, 2002 Meeting 3. Clam Bay Project Description and Review of Current and Proposed Activities A. Current Permit Required Activities 1. Hydrographic monitoring and analysis of survey and tide gauge , data 2. Water Quality Monitoring 3. Biological Monitoring 4. Annual Report B. Current Discretionary Activities for Clam Bay 1. Study to divert development stormwater within the Clam Bay System 2. Removal of cattails along berm 3. Riley Mangroves 4. Alternative Plantings 5. Study and Removal of Seagate Culvert Flapgates 6. Canoe Trail and education material C. Proposed Fiscal Year 2003 Work Program 1. Hydodynamic Modeling 2. Dune Restoration 3. Water Level Monitoring Within Inner Mangroves 4. Additional Flushing Channels 5. Hard Bottom Survey 4. Audience Participation 5. Adjourn ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE ~AY , NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS~t~M,~I~a; WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE C o I c r C o ~ ~ t y CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE MINUTES - July 17, 2002 Naples, Florida 16J LET IT BE KNOWN, that the Clam Bay Sub-committee of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met in Regular Session on this date, July 17, 2002 at 1:00 P.M. at Hammock Oak Center, 8962 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present: Mr. David Roellig, Chairman Mr. John Domenie Mr. M. James Burke (Absent) Mr. George Werner ALSO PRESENT: Approximately five (5) Pelican Bay residents; Mr. Tim Hall, Turrell & Associates; Mr. Ken Humiston, Humiston & Moore Engineers; Mr. Kyle Lukasz, Field Manager, Pelican Bay Services Division; Mr. James P. Ward, Department Director, Pelican Bay Services Division; and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of the May 1,2002 Meeting 3. Discussion of the Consultant Proposal for Long Term Maintenance and Restoration of the Clam Bay Restoration Program 4. Adjourn ROLL CALL Mr. Roellig called the meeting to order and asked that the record show Mr. James Burke with an excused absence. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE MAY 1,2002 MEETING Mr. Domenie moved, seconded by Mr. Werner and approved unanimously, the Minutes of the May 1, 2002 meeting. DISCUSSION OF THE CONSULTANT PROPOSAL FOR LONG TERM MAINTENANCE AND RESTORATION OF THE CLAM BAY RESTORATION PROGRAM Mr. Ward explained that he would set the stage as to where the Sub-committee is in the Clam Bay process and you can then decide how you would want to proceed from there. Mr. Ward explained that during your yearly presentation and more recently, the consultants presented a program to deal more long term with where we are going with respect to the restoration of the Clam Bay system versus the operating program that we have currently been undergoing. During the presentations the consultants provided you with some recommendations 187 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J and proposals to handle those services for an ensuing number of years. At your Budget Workshop and what was approved as a part of the budget process for the beginning of next fiscal year, were sufficient funds to handle the complete work program that has been identified to you. The one caveat to that was that we would take a step back and at the Sub-committee level evaluate or re-evaluate whether or not you wanted to undergo any long-term review of that program or to alternatively continue down the route that we have been operating under for the last few years. That program is to simply perform the minimum obligations that we have under our permit requirements for the Clam Bay system and doing some additional work that is primarily the interior tidal channels within the program. Those are two completely different operating protocols for the Clam Bay system. This is an opportunity for you to take a look at that and decide where you want to go in the future. The proposals that Turrell and Associates and the consulting staff have put together for you are intended to take a more long term look, versus a minimum maintenance look at the Clam Bay system. It is important for you to understand those two differences and then to make some decision or recommendation as to where you want to go with the restoration of the Clam Bay system next year and most importantly, more long term. Mr. Roellig stated, "My recollection was that the other point of discussion was whether or not we would begin some of this work in the current fiscal year rather than waiting until October". Mr. Ward replied, "Yes, to the extent that you decide to move forward with a more aggressive plan, there is an opportunity for you to move forward now versus waiting until October". Mr. Domenie asked, "Are there funds available to move forward this year"? Mr. Ward replied, "There were some programs that we did not do this year i.e., replanting of the north area and that would free up sufficient funds to allow you to start sooner than the fall of this year". Mr. Werner stated, "Since April, I have been asking for proposals to spend money, which we received. I believe Mr. Turrell and Mr. Lewis had agreed to put together a plan to lay out exactly what we are going to do and what we hope to accomplish by doing it. I know we have 188 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J studies from Mr. Lewis and Humiston and Moore, but other than measuring the amount of water coming into Clam Bay, I don't know what the plan is. I just can't put my hand on it. Mr. Ward replied, "That is everyone's consternation or concern at the moment". What is the goal, or is there a goal, is the better question that everyone has been grappling with since April? Mr. Roellig stated, "We should have something in writing from Turrell and Associates, that we can individually read, showing how these studies integrate with what we are doing, provide some indication of the benefits that could be derived from them and what the long term outlook would be". Mr. Hall explained that the consultants are gearing up to begin all of the monitoring that is associated with the Annual Report that we prepare as a condition of the permit. Entailed in that is checking the current condition of all of the study plots within the mangrove area, looking at the regeneration that is occurring within the die-off area as a whole, along with diving and monitoring the existing condition of sea grasses that were in place prior to the dredging. The diving is a sea grass survey, which consists of a couple of transects across the bay that are also included in the monitoring. We are trying to coordinate all of the people that are doing work in the system that are not part of our team of consultants. Ms. Worley, with the Conservancy, has been doing a lot of work in the system and she has said that she will make her data available to us. We are hoping to get an overview of what it is that she has available and to start integrating her data with what we are producing. Mr. Hall continued that we are endeavoring to get the survey completed for all of the channels that Mr. Lewis has been working on, in order to produce a map that would be available as part of that report as well. That map will allow the members of the Committee and the Pelican Bay community to see where all of the work has been done and how that is influencing the system as a whole. Mr. Werner stated, "1 assume that coordinating the others outside of the consulting team and the final map of the channels is not part of the annual monitoring, is that right"? 189 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 1_6J 1. Mr. Hall replied, "It is not part of what is required, but it is something that will be included this year". Mr. Domenie stated, "When you say this year, we approved $30,000 in the budget to do that starting in October". Mr. Hall replied, "That is right and the report that we normally provide is due in November". Mr. Domenie asked, "Is this something you start now using available funds"? Mr. Hall stated, "What I am doing right now, I am doing in anticipation of the funds being made available, but will not be billed until I am told that the funds are actually available". It is information that I want to have available for the report. Mr. Hall continued, as far as the annual monitoring and report that is the work that is underway or is currently set to get underway during July and August. The other on-going project is the cattail area and the replanting. Mr. Lukasz has been coordinating an on-going program with getting areas that are regenerating re-sprayed. There are some areas, such as adjacent to the north tram station, where the cattails appear to be under control and we can now go out for bid for the replanting. Mr. Lukasz stated that there is presently some pricing available. Mr. Hall stated, 'M/hile the planting is being done, any of the remaining remnant cattails are going to be pulled by hand and physically removed". There are a couple of remnant pockets that will have to be removed. That area will be planted first, since it is the area that is most ready. The calls that we have been getting indicate that people are tired of not seeing anything new going in and this area is ready to be planted. Mr. Werner stated, "Those calls are coming from people further south". Mr. Hall replied, "If we tried planting the areas further south it would be wasted money because the cattails will just crowd them out". The cattails are still too prolific in some of those areas. Mr. Roellig stated, "1 believe that we need to set some kind of a deadline or period where we can say we have done as much cattail removal as possible and go on with it". From what I 190 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J have seen there are still a lot of cattails growing in many areas and I don't think we want to continue spraying for another year or so. Based on input from you and Mr. Lukasz, I feel we there should be some point where we say we have done all we can and we have to go with what we have. We have been spraying this since April. Mr. Werner asked, "What do you mean when you say, "to go with what we have"? Mr. Roellig replied, "We can be spraying for another two years". Mr. Werner replied, '1 understand that, but do you mean plant the area and waste the money"? Mr. Roellig stated, '1 believe we need a recommendation on that, but sometime fairly soon we should have some sort of a date in mind where we are going to say that the spraying is not going to do it'L Mr. Ward stated, "What you have committed to is that we would get through a rainy season, which would be the fall of this year". We would then evaluate it at that point in time to see if there is a decision that can be made with respect to the issue. In this business when you are doing environmental restoration, I hate to put drop-dead date on things. Things could change between now and the drop dead date that you may want to re-evaluate. Mr. Roellig stated, "We need to indicate that we have some long term program in mind and I believe November is kind of long term". I would have to be convinced that we would need to continue this spraying for another year or so. Unfortunately, there are a lot of areas where the cattails appear to be recovering very nicely. Mr. Domenie stated, "The question I asked at the last meeting was about the growth in front of the mangroves". Do we have to kill all of those plants before we replant? Are they going to drown out whatever we plant? Mr. Hall replied, "No sir". Some of the regeneration can be left in lieu of replanting. Some of the plants coming in right now are called "succession", but the early colonizers are coming in right now and will hit their peak. Some of that "succession" will die off naturally and others will come in behind it. We do want to work at pulling the mangroves out from there as well and help them with some propagule plantings once the main seed drop has occurred and to start 191 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J bringing the mangroves closer to the berm in a few of the areas where they are out quite a distance. Mr. Domenie asked, "If we decide eventually to divert the water flow from System IV to System Ill, how will that affect any planting that you would like to recommend"? Mr. Hall replied, "With the plants we are proposing we are keeping that in mind". The three options that I am looking at are that nothing is done with the water management and the system remains exactly as it is right now; some of the water is diverted to the south or to the north, if the Vanderbilt Lagoon reconnection occurs, and the third possibility that with some of the upcoming storms more salt water is introduced into those areas and could have some residence time. Under all three of those scenarios, the plants that we are proposing would be able to acclimate and survive. Mr. Werner asked, "Will mangroves out-compete cattails"? Mr. Hall replied, "Mangroves can shade the cattails out if they grow higher". Mr. Werner asked, "The concern with the plants you are considering is that the cattails will out-compete them". Mr. Hall replied, "Yes, in its' current condition what will happen is if we get the cattails out of there and the plants we are proposing become established, then the cattails will not re- establish. The seeds will be shaded out and be out-competed by the existing vegetation. Right now with just an open slate, some of the roots that are still remaining, as well as the seed source, are still growing faster that anything we could plant out there. Mr. Domenie asked, ''When you say right now, do you mean during the rainy season or in November"? Mr. Hall replied, "1 am talking about right now". We would like to be planting the area that we are currently looking at in August. Mr. Roellig stated, "My main point is that surely by November we are going to have to make a decision as to where we want to go with these cattails". If we are still getting the same amount of re-growth as we see right now, it is going to be hard to justify continuing to fight them for another year or so. That should be a major part of the consideration in the report. 192 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J Mr. Werner asked, "Is your recommendation now that you want to do some planting in the area toward the north"? Mr. Hall replied, "Yes". Mr. Werner asked, "Is that budgeted or was that a part of the other planting budget"? Mr. Ward replied, "Part of the other planting budget". There are sufficient funds in the total budget in order to accomplish this and ail the funds included replanting this area. Mr. Domenie asked, "What is the cost estimate for this work"? Mr. Hall replied, "For that area specifically, I am estimating approximately $8,000- $12,000, but I have not seen all of the plant quotes that Mr. Lukasz has received". That would include the planting and the hand removal of the remnant cattails that are in that section. Mr. Werner asked, "Are you recommending that"? You don't think there is a problem with the cattails re-establishing themselves and crowding out the plants? Mr. Hall replied, "Based on the regeneration that we are seeing in this area, no". I think it is appropriate that we can replant it now. Mr. Roellig asked, "Does it apply to the other area also"? Mr. Hall replied, "That is the area in front of the Sandpiper where the most aggressive re- growth and regeneration of the cattails has been taking place". We sent a letter to FDEP asking about the possibility of pumping saltwater from the bay into that area to assist with knocking down the cattails and Primrose Willow that are starting to establish in that area. There are also a couple of channel cuts proposed for that area to connect that area to the bay. Those cuts have not been done yet and are part of the new proposal from Mr. Lewis. I believe that Mr. Lukasz has said that he is ready to start tomorrow to actually pump saltwater from the water source into these two areas. The water would flow behind the ridge and the residence time is going to be long enough to assist with the spraying program in stressing out the cattails and knocking them back to the point that we can get them under a little better control. Mr. Werner asked, "Did you get the approval from FDEP"? Mr. Hall replied, "Yes". We sent a letter to FDEP outlining the program about four weeks ago. 193 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 Mr. Werner stated, "1 would like to take these items one at a time". Do we need to make a recommendation to the entire Board that we move forward with the work at the north end? Mr. Ward relied, "Yes". Mr. Roellig stated, "They will not be able to start before the August Board Meeting". Mr. Ward replied, "That is correct". Mr. Hall stated, "By the August Board Meeting we should have the actual cost estimate, the contractor and the time frame that will be required for the work". Mr. Werner moved, seconded by Mr. Domenie and approved unanimously that we move forward with the replanting of the northern cattail area. Mr. Werner asked, '`what is needed with respect to the two areas in front of the Sandpiper?" Mr. Ward explained this other project is a minor amount of money and can be done without an approval. Mr. Hall stated all it is, is a small centrifugal water pump that is going to move some of the higher salinity water from the bay into these areas. We will be pumping the water behind the ridge and will increase the residence time of the salt to allow for salt saturation in the soil that will stress the cattails to where the spraying is more effective. If it doesn't kill them outright, it will assist in the control by making them more susceptible. Mr. Roellig asked, "Do we have a handle on what the salinity of that water is"? Mr. Hall replied, "We do have that data, but I do not know what it is off the top of my head, but it is sufficient enough to make this viable". Mr. Roellig asked, "Would you be putting this pump in a boat and running it for a week or so"? Mr. Hall replied, "That is correct". Mr. Domenie asked, "How big is this pipe". Mr. Lukasz replied, "There are two four inch pumps". 194 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J Mr. Domenie asked, "Will you be running it off of electricity or a small generator on the boat or raft that you will be using"? Mr. Hall replied, "They are gasoline powered". Mr. Domenie asked, "Will we get complaints from people that at 3:00 A.M. it is running and making noises"? Mr. Roellig asked, "Will it just be done during normal working hours"? Mr. Lukasz replied, "We will fuel it at the end of the day and let it run". If we do get complaints we will have to address it at that time. Mr. Werner stated, "1 would think that this time of year most people would have their doors closed anyway". Mr. Hall stated, "With the trees that are present there, they provide a lot of buffer". Mr. Domenie asked, "Can you show me where you are going to lay the pipe"? Is it just going to be four-inch pipe and are you then going to put in a "T" to spread it out over a larger area or is it just going to bubble and form a hole? To be effective I would think that you would want to have two pipes running out to the side. Mr. Hall replied, "There are two pumps with two pipes". The pipes themselves will outfall into that area. The spreading out that you are talking about is going to be accomplished by the existing ridge that is in that area. The water will not flow out and will stack behind it. Mr. Domenie stated, "Earlier you said one pump, now you are saying two pumps, each with four inch pipes". Mr. Hall replied, "Right". I thought it was one pump, but Mr. Lukasz has advised me that he actually has two. Mr. Domenie asked, "Will there be two pipes leading into the area"? What do we do, just lay the pipes through the mangroves? Mr. Hall replied, "Yes". There is no cutting or trimming required. Mr. Domenie asked, "is there any danger of a hurricane or fuel spills or anything that we have to contend with"? 195 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J 1 Mr. Hall replied, "We would have enough notice in the case of a storm to be able to get it out of there". We did think about the possibility of spills while the pumps are being refueled and we are going to have a pan under them to contain anything that might spill. Mr. Werner asked, "How long of an operation do you plan this to be"? Mr. Lukasz replied, "Initially we plan to have them run for about a week to see if it is flooding the area". Mr. Domenie asked, "Is there an estimate of cost of laying the pipe and bringing the equipment in"? Mr. Lukasz replied, ''We are laying the pipe ourselves". It is four-inch flexible plastic pipe and the pumps are approximately $400.00 per week, so it is approximately $800.00 for us to run two pumps. Mr. Domenie stated, "1 am just not convinced of the effectiveness of running something for a week". Mr. Werner replied, "We have spent a lot more money than this on things we have tried that may or may not have worked". Mr. Ward stated, "We are spending $3,000 for each cattail treatment right now". Mr. Lukasz stated, "With this last cattail treatment where we had to bring the airboat in, it was $3,900". Mr. Ward explained if this works it would stop the phone calls from people calling about the spraying. If the saltwater can get residence time in that area, it should work very effectively. Mr. Hall stated, "There is no downside to this work". If it doesn't work we are not in any worse shape than we are right now. The only thing that I am not happy about is that we do not have the saltwater getting up into that area like we wanted it to. If this does work, it may mean that this is something that could be an annual occurrence, where we might need to run the pumps for a week every year to keep saltwater in that area to maintain what we are doing. Mr. Domenie asked, ''Why don't we start at the north end where we are planting and work our way down slowly and kill everything off with saltwater, rather than starting in the middle"? 196 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 Mr. Hall replied, "At the north end of the system where the spraying has been 98% effective and the replanting can be done, the better solution is to pull what is left by hand". Mr. Domenie asked, "Who is going to be doing that"? Mr. Lukasz replied, "That will be done by the contractor who is going to do the plant installation". Mr. Domenie stated, '9 was under the impression that the re-spraying was being done under the original contract". Mr. Lukasz replied, "This is the first time we have paid for this work". The original contractor who was hired to remove the cattails was required to spray it for six months. Mr. Roellig stated, '9 don't have a problem with this". If you recall about three or four years ago I had asked Dr. Reed to look at the mangroves and one of his recommendations was to try to pump some saltwater into the area. That pumping may have some other benefits besides just killing the cattails. It should please the Board because we are doing something for a modest cost without a lot of additional new studies. Mr. Domenie stated, '9 will go along with doing the work providing that we know the salinity from where you are pumping is greater than 7 ppm". Mr. Hall replied, "As part of that, what we will be doing is a daily monitoring of the salinity in the bay at the outfall and along the berm to see how the water is moving". Mr. Roellig stated, "People have asked this before and we have never answered the question". Saltwater is heavier than freshwater and if sometime you could check the column that would help. Presumably you could place the intake a little off of the bottom because heavier saltwater would come in anyway. Mr. Hall replied, "The intake for the pumps will be approximately mid-column". Mr. Roellig asked, "Would you be more comfortable with a motion to that affect"? Mr. Ward replied, '9 don't need a motion to spend $1,000". Mr. Hall explained that is the existing work schedule for the next two months. Starting in October or possibly earlier, a new activity that we want to get underway is to install some data loggers that would monitor the water levels within the mangroves themselves. That will tie in with 197 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 some of the work that has been proposed by Humiston and Moore in their hydrographic study of the system. Mr. Humiston explained that the Humiston and Moore portion of the work is a hydrodynamic analysis of the system. There are a number of parts to that analysis. The first thing that we will do is a complete hydrographic survey to map out the depths within the system. We do not have to survey the entire system because some of that has been mapped from the dredging and monitoring work that we have done. There are parts of the bay where we do not have that information so we would survey those areas. That information is important because the resistance of flow is a function of the water depth. In very shallow areas it would sheet flow and there is a lot of resistance to that flow. It is very important input for the model. Mr. Humiston stated, "The first step of the modeling is that we get all of the bathymetry, the geometry of the waterway. We would also input the tidal ranges, which are the driving force that makes the water go in and out and get the model to mimic the actual system. A very important step is to make sure the model accurately indicates what is going on. Once we have the model providing that, we can modify the freshwater inflow at the north end of the system. WilsonMiller is providing that information. If the freshwater flow is diverted in another direction, this model will tell us how that will change the actual elevations and ranges of the water level in the system. Mr. Hall and the people looking at the mangrove system to see how the mangroves respond to the changes in water level will use that information. Mr. Domenie asked, "Is that the $70,000 study that we are talking about"? Mr. Hall replied, "Yes". Mr. Wemer stated," I understand what Mr. Humiston said". We have to establish some goals as to what we hope to fully accomplish in the end. Unless we have some clear cut goals where we want to make sure that the mangroves survive regardless of cost or something like that, I can't see spending $70,000 on this study. We have talked about moving the storm water from System IV to System III and the feeling that I have is that there is no urgency for that to be done and there is not much support from the Board for doing that work unless we come back with some firm recommendation. The other thing I keep hearing is the Vanderbilt reconnect, which I 198 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J ti think would be wonderful for the environment, but I didn't see much support from the Board for doing that reconnection. Again, I would just like to see how all of this ties into whatever our future goal may be. Mr. Hall stated, "One hypotheses and I know Mr. Lewis is very convinced that one of the things that contributed to the die off area was the stacking of water". The three characteristics that are felt to have contributed to the die off are the height of the water, the length of time that it stayed there and the change of salinity. That area appears to be doing well now. The change in the water getting off of that area has helped in the regeneration that has begun and has been ongoing. Even when we had the ten inches of rain last month, the water drained very well, the plants are still growing and it has given us some cause for optimism that that area maybe recovering. Mr. Hall continued that the other side of that is that there are a couple of other areas further to the south, on the berm side of the system, that have been looking more and more stressed. That area has us a little concerned because of the level of stress being exhibited by the mangroves. Some of the pneumatophores of the black mangroves are dead and are no longer supporting the tree in this area. We are concerned about what may be happening in that area is similar to what happened in the die off area. We want to be very sure that we can definitively say that it is because the water is getting too high and we need to establish some channels or quicker path for the water to drain before the system collapses as it did on the other side. We don't have that information on hand and we are not funded to collect that information. Part of what we are proposing is the baseline to see where the system is right now and to be able to evaluate how any of the changes that we might want to make will affect the existing conditions. Mr. Werner asked, "If you have this information and you have a stressed area do you send in a swat team to dig a channel"? Mr. Hall replied, "If that is what is determined to be the driving force of the stress". Mr. Werner stated, "You don't know that". You believe that is probably what caused it at the north end, but we still don't actually know that do we? 199 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J Mr. Hall replied, "No". I think one of the things that make those determinations so hard is that we don't have the data of what the system was like before the mangroves died. Mr. Werner stated, "We would have appeared to be a lot of idiots if we had started to collect data before they started dying and said in case they start to die we will have this data". That is a few hundred thousand dollars of your tax money that we spent on them. The system has been stressed for over thirty years based on the information that we have been provided. Mr. Hall replied, "Yes, based on information that we have, this system has been under varying degrees of stress for over thirty years". Mr. Werner stated, "The relief for a stressed area, as I have been led to believe, is to dig a channel and get the water out or try to get the water flushing in and out". Mr. Hall replied, "That has been the most successful activity so far with getting those areas to re-establish". Mr. Domenie stated, "This study has to be done over a twelve month period to be effective, right"? Mr. Humiston replied, "No, it would be done using twelve month's worth of information on fresh water flow". As you know certain times of the year the fresh water flow into the system is much higher than other times.' Mr. Domenie replied, "So it will take twelve months to do this study". Mr. Humiston replied, "No, we have this information from the study done by WilsonMiller". WilsonMiller has broken it down into average monthly flow rates for the twelve months and this is the information that we would use as the input for the model. We don't have to go out and measure the water flows. Mr. Domenie stated, "1 am confused". Mr. Humiston stated, "The information we are going to use for the model is the twelve average monthly flow rates. We don't have to go out and collect data for a year in order to get that information as it is already available. It will take some time to do this. There is a very large area that needs to be surveyed, which would have to be scheduled and will take a while to get that data collected and reduced to an input that we can place into the model. We are looking at a 2OO CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J number of months. I am not sure of the timeframe we provided for completing that work, but you are probably looking at four to five months to complete the process. Mr. Domenie stated, "You say that additionally it is assumed that the flows through the culverts at Seagate are so Iow that they are closed". We have talked about removing those flap gates for over a year and shouldn't that be part of this study? Mr. Humiston replied, "My understanding is that those flap gates would be removed before we do the studies". Our baseline information that we will use to calibrate the model will be the condition with the flow valves removed. Mr. Domenie asked, "Is that now a definite?" Mr. Lukasz replied, "At the last meeting it was stated that we had the approval from the City of Naples". Mr. Domenie replied, "Right, but I had not heard that we were going to go ahead with the removal". Mr. Lukasz explained that we monitored one high tide and Mr. Humiston has recommended that we monitor the flow through those pipes during a smaller tide scenario and then we will be prepared to remove the valves. I spoke with the contractor and he needs approximately a four to five day notice. We should get the smaller tide monitoring done during the next week, so the valves should be removed in the next two to three weeks. Mr. Werner asked, "Do we actually have the letter of approval from the City"? Mr. Hall replied, "We have the letter from the City and they have requested that they be notified when the work is going to happen". Mr. Domenie stated, "As far as I understand the budget for next year, we have approved the study to move storm water from System IV to System Ill." I objected to the $300,000 being included, but we agreed to allow the study in the amount $70,000 to remain in the budget. Mr. Roellig replied, "That study has been completed by WilsonMiller". Mr. Ward explained the study was finished. What is in the budget is the design and construction. 201 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J 1 Mr. Werner stated, "If they ever move forward with this, we don't have what the impact would be on the southern part of the system". Mr. Roellig stated, "1 have the feeling that we need to try to get a handle on this project". The comments will be written down in the minutes, but my concern is that those minutes will end up in someone's drawer. What we really need is some kind of a short recognizance report that can be passed out showing where we are heading. Mr. Hall stated, "1 understand". I know that both Mr. Turrell and Mr. Lewis have both said that they would work on providing a critical path and the timeframe for what it is we are proposing to do, as well as the ending periods with the product. That is something I have been working on and coordinating with Mr. Lewis. The only unknown is whether or not the Board is going to approve some of this additional work that we have proposed and whether or not that should be included in that critical path. Mr. Domenie asked, "Mr. Roellig are you saying we are working with patchwork or band aids and you want to see the overall goal for three years if you can do that"? Mr. Roellig replied, "1 am looking for a document that could be updated". We do need some kind of a report, which indicates the benefits for these various parts of the study, how they interrelate to each other and what we could expect the beneficial or negative impact to be. The problem I have is that it is interesting to get these reports or comments during our meetings and I don't want to get into a report that is going to be sent to the State, but something for our own use and the people of Pelican Bay to get some kind of a feeling of how this all integrates and why some work is more critical than other. Mr. Hall replied, "1 believe I understand what you are saying and I can produce a short synopsis or overview of the work plan that we are proposing and how the different components either interrelate or are necessary, one for the other. I can also try to assign a value or prioritize them with which is critical to be done and which is not. From an ecological standpoint I may tend to bias things more towards ecology than towards politics. Mr. Roellig stated, "If you had a draft and ran it by some of the other consultants, we would have something to work from". 202 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J Mr. Domenie replied, "1 agree, an overall plan". Mr. Hall stated, "With some of the new work we are doing, such as the hydrodynamic analysis and the bathymetric surveys and some of the hydrologic work that I am wanting to do in the mangroves, I don't think that is something that absolutely has to be done right now and is not going to affect the recovery or non-recovery of the system". What it is going to do is to provide us with information that will allow us to make better and more informed decisions later on, should either positive or negative events occur. Mr. Werner stated, "You mentioned politics". I assume you were talking about the connection of Vanderbilt Bay. I hope you don't feel that you have to play politics with anybody on this Committee or our Board. I will guarantee you that there are some pretty independent minded people on our Board. Mr. Hall replied, "No, I am just referring to a lot of things". I have had to argue pretty strenuously against replanting the cattail area because I don't believe the cattails have been brought under control enough to warrant spending the money to replant it yet. Whereas I know a lot of the residents are very adamant that they would like to see it green immediately. I fully understand that, but I have been posing a less than popular view and espousing patience until we can get that area to where I feel it is more appropriate.' Mr. Roellig stated, "1 believe that in a sense, that is our problem". We need the technical opinions and information and then it is up to Mr. Ward and the Board to handle the population. Mr. Domenie stated, "In your proposal you have established five stations for water level monitoring within the mangrove communities". How does that interrelate with the studies that WilsonMiller has done in the past and with the studies that we are asking Humiston and Moore to prepare? Mr. Hall replied, "It is fundamental in that WilsonMiller is going to tell us how much water is reaching the berm". That has already been done. The study proposed by Humiston and Moore is going to tell us how the water between the mangroves and the open water areas adjusts taking into account the tides and the water coming through the berm. The information that we 2O3 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J 1' don't have is what happens between the berm and the water. How does the water get through the mangroves? How high does the water get and how long does it stay there? Mr. Domenie stated, "His study will have to take that into consideration". If he says "x" number of gallons of fresh water flow into the berm and it flows out, it has to go through the mangroves. Mr. Hall replied, "It does have to go through the mangroves, but it doesn't all have to go through consistently". It could be channeling, ponding or being diverted because of some slight rise in elevation. Mr. Domenie asked, "Will we have that data"? Mr. Humiston replied, "Our proposal is to look at the fresh water inflow at the north end of the system". The question is whether or not that fresh water is stacking and not able to get out fast enough and causing damage to the mangroves is what we would be looking at with this modeling effort. By looking at the different conditions during the dry season and the wet season when there is a lot of water coming in, we will be able to tell Mr. Hall to what degree that freshwater is stacking in the system. We have to set a geometric limit to the bay area that we are modeling so that the mangroves that Mr. Hall is talking about get up into the higher elevations and will be outside of that boundary. There is going to be a phase lag if the water goes up in the open part of the bay; the water wilt seep back into the mangroves and will take a while to reach that elevation. While that is going on, the water will be flowing out of the system. It is complicated but it is all tied together. Mr. Domenie asked, "When you say the north end, will that only be the western part or will you include the die off area too"? Mr. Humiston replied, "No, the die off area is within the part we are modeling". The die off area is a higher elevation and will be outside the limits of our modeling. Mr. Domenie asked, "How much fresh water is bubbling up and how will that affect any of your studies"? Mr. Humiston replied, "That is something that I was talking to Mr. Hall about". We do have WilsonMiller's report that provides the groundwater and surface water. I have talked with 204 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J Mr. Johnson of WilsonMiller about getting together before we start to ensure that we are using the correct information as the input to our model. Mr. Domenie stated, "1 understand there was a terrific difference between the two studies as to the quantity of groundwater that may be entering the system". Mr. Humiston replied, "There was an earlier study done by Missimer & Associates". Mr. Hall stated, "There was also a study done prior to Missimer's and those are the two studies you are referring to". There was quite a bit of discrepancy between them as to how much groundwater was coming into the system. From what Mr. Humiston has said from their conversation, WilsonMiller did not come up with the same numbers as Missimer. That is why we are going to need to get together to make sure everybody agrees on the numbers that are being used. Mr. Domenie asked, "Does that groundwater vary during the season or is it steady"? Mr. Humiston replied, "According to the WilsonMiller study, it does vary during the season". Mr. Werner asked, "Is this study something for next fiscal year"? Mr. Ward replied, "Yes, it is in next year's budget". One of the decisions you have to make is whether or not you want to do and if so, when.' Mr. Werner stated, "We made a special point that we were including a lot of things in the budget, but we weren't necessarily going to approve everything". If we should decide they were worthwhile we could go ahead with them. Mr. Roellig explained that we could put this off for another Sub-committee meeting, but we have to make a recommendation at either the August or September meeting of the Board. Mr. Werner stated, "1 still don't see it all tied together". Mr. Hall stated, '~Nhat we may need is to write this report and a synopsis outlining how the studies tie into each other and into the work that we are doing now and why we think those studies should be done". Mr. Werner stated, "Also to prioritize them". 2O5 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J Mr. Domenie stated, "It should also tell us what is required under the ten-year plan and what other studies or actions we may want to take". I think that would be extremely valuable. It should be no more than five pages and put in a binder that we could all keep permanently. Mr. Ward stated, "You somewhat have that now". The chart that you get with your meeting agenda every month outlines the work program and is nothing more than the minimum requirements that are contained under your permit. That costs you $65,000 a year and is essentially funded by the County. The Humiston & Moore Proposal and the Turrell Proposal to provide the additional staffing levels and hard bottom survey and all the work that Mr. Lewis is going to do and is really the program that is intended to tell you the next few steps. I believe that is what Mr. Hall needs to pull together for you and put it in some logical format. The Annual Monitoring Report and the biological and salinity monitoring are just the normal things that are required to be done under the permit. Mr. Werner stated, "Unlike Mr. Roellig and Mr. Domenie, I prefer the Reader's Digest version". Mr. Hall replied, "1 will be more than happy to put that together". The hard bottom study refers to the fact that there is an existing hard bottom community off the beach and this was brought up at a couple of FDEP meetings. It was asked, what kind of affect all of the dredging and work we are doing is having on that community? We can't really answer that question right now. I know with the opening of the pass it appears to be self-maintaining right now and we know that there is a lot more flow going in and out of the pass. I believe the concern of FDEP is that potentially a lot of the sediment, because of the flow that we are getting that may have been originally deposited or held in the pass, is being put out over the hard bottom and could be impacting the bottom life. We need to take some pictures and be able to document the impacts. Mr. Roellig stated, "We are looking at the entire stretch of shoreline, but that same issue may come up again during the dune restoration". Is this hard bottom survey just of the pass area? Mr. Hall replied, "It is pretty much the entire length of the beach". 2O6 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 l_6J [ Mr. Roellig stated, "Sooner or later they will want to know about that during the dune restoration". Mr. Hall explained that the dune restoration is not a beach restoration. The work is all upward of the high tide line, but if you ever did need to do a beach restoration, you will need that background. Mr. Werner asked, "Is this something the FDEP is requiring or something they would prefer"? Mr. Hall replied, "FDEP has not required it, but it has come up in conversations". Mr. Werner asked, "What is your suggestion"? Mr. Hall replied, "My suggestion is that if you believe you may ever need to do a beach restoration and you have the information on what the hard bottom is like right now, then FDEP cannot come back after the restoration and say you have impacted that area". You will have the baseline data that says that it has not changed from what it was prior to the restoration. Mr. Werner asked, "Why couldn't you do that two days before you began the beach restoration"? Mr. Hall replied, "Normally if you have to do a beach restoration, it is usually because of a catastrophic event". You would do it before the restoration also. You may have had an event, which could have significantly changed the historic condition of that hard bottom. Mr. Werner asked, "Are you suggesting we spend money to do a hard bottom survey". Mr. Hall replied, "Yes, that is why it is in our proposal". It has never been done and is the outer edge of the periphery of the system that we have been charged with maintaining and monitoring. Mr. Roellig stated, "In the City of Naples there are places where the hard bottom is very close to the shoreline". If there are areas like that we need to know that before we come up with some type of general purpose dune or beach restoration". Mr. Hall explained this issue came up prior in relationship to the dredging that we were doing at the pass because of the silt flume we had going out to the beach. We did dive and take pictures of the hard bottom then to have on hand so that we could have baseline data. 2O7 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J Mr. Domenie asked, "What is the definition of hard bottom"? Mr. Hall replied, "It is not sand". It is limestone and areas where the sand has scoured or rock outcroppings where there is a different bottom community. It could be sponges and algae that form and live on those areas as opposed to the kind of desert that we have on the sand bottom. It is important to the entire food chain. The fish concentrate around those areas as well. Mr. Roellig stated, "In the City of Naples the hard bottom is close to shore and it constrains your design for the beach". You cannot do beach renourishment if it is going to put sand on the hard bottom. It is a high value environmental area and cannot be buried. Mr. Hall stated, "The reason I am recommending this survey is because this can act as an insurance policy for the Board and for the community". Mr. Werner stated, "1 am confused by your recommendation". In your proposal you have a dollar amount for a hard bottom survey and I assumed that was for the Clam Pass area or is that the price for the whole beach? Mr. Hall replied, "That is for the whole beach". Mr. Turrell tells me I have underbid it. That is something that I believe is important and what we are proposing to do is the diving and mapping. Mr. Werner replied, "You have my full support at that price". Mr. Roellig stated, "1 would be interested in the views of the Committee as to whether or not it would be worthwhile to have another meeting before our Regular Board meeting or bring it up to the full Board in early September"? Mr. Werner stated, "You are two weeks away from your next meeting and I don't think that is enough time". Mr. Ward replied, "No, and a lot of us are on vacation during the next couple of weeks". Mr. Roellig stated, "We can cover this at the next Board Meeting". Mr. Hall stated, "1 can get the synopsis that you are asking for to you prior to your next meeting". Mr. Ward explained that we will start preparation of our agenda package next week for the August 7, 2002 meeting. 208 CLAM BAY SUB-COMMITTEE July 17, 2002 16J Mr. Roellig stated, "1 can report to the Board that this report will be reviewed at a Sub- committee meeting during August and will be available with our recommendation at their September meeting". Mr. Werner stated, "We already have the money budgeted for next year and that does not start until October". If we do not make our recommendation until the September meeting, we are not delaying anything. We have agreed today to start planting the north end and to start pumping saltwater at the Sandpiper location. Mr. Domenie asked, "For the August Meeting will you prepare a presentation for the planting to commence in the north section?" Mr. Hall replied, "Yes, although I will not be here for that meeting". Mr. Werner stated, "Even if you can't, you have already provided the types of plants that will be used". I think all the Board will want is a better idea of the price. Mr. Domenie asked, "Where do we stand with the approvals for the dune restoration"? Mr. Hall reported that Humiston & Moore has been processing that application. received a letter from Mr. Humiston saying that the only thing they were lacking was the letter from Collier County and I understand that has been received. That was the last thing that FDEP needed to consider the application. The permit could potentially be issued by November which is also the end of the turtle-nesting season so work could begin. Mr. Hall stated, "Prior to your next meeting we will have started the annual monitoring and the coordination of everyone's information". Mr. Roellig stated, "1 presume you have the annual aerial photograph". Mr. Hall replied, "That was to have been flown on July 15th, depending upon the weather". ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 2:20 P.M. Mr. David Roellig, Chairman 2O9 ST. PIERRE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mr. Lou Vlasho, President Board of Directors Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive Suite 605 Naples, FL 34108 8/17/02 16J 1 Dear Lou, On June 4, 2002, nineteen presidents, board members, and residents of five of the nine high rise associations, starting with St. Marissa and continuing north to the Montenero, met to discuss the condition of the area west of the berm between the berm and the mangroves. These associations represent approximately one thousand units and over two thousand residents. All of the people present were profoundly disturbed by what has happened to the area. Of special concern is the loss of bird, animal, reptile, fish, and amphibian life from the area, as well as the seriously degraded appearance of the area. The above paragraph opens a letter I wrote To Department Director Jim Ward a few days after the June 4 meeting. I have enclosed a copy of that letter. I have not had any response from Mr. Ward and have decided to address you and the other members of the Board directly. The situation along the berm has not grown any better in thc weeks following our meeting. The spraying has continued. The green duckweed has spread. A futile brackish water pumping scheme is operating, creating a completely dead zone close to the nozzle of the hose but doing nothing to increase the overall salinity of the water along the west side of the berm. In a meeting with Mr. Ward. prior to the June 4 meeting. I was told that it was expected the August and September tides would be high enough to floor thc area west of the berm. kill all the remaining cattails, and allow a replanting of salt tolerant plants to go tbrward. That hope has yet to be realized, and I would venture a guess that it will not be. Cattails will continue to rise from the muck. If the spraying goes on. the natural succession of plants that would naturally reseed the exposed mud will be further impeded. To see what would happen if the spaying were stopped and the land allowed to recover on its own. look at the area west of the berm and beginning just beyond the first bend in the berm south of the Sandpiper tram stop. The area is almost completely recovered from the spraying. White. lavender, and yellow blossoming flowers and shrubs cover the area.. Nature has done at no cost to us what it will always do if left alone. It has healed itself. t~S25 GREN:\DIER BOUI.EV:\RD · NA?LES, FIA)RID.\ 3410S -~.:1~ =---~24S o F.",\ :~41~ 50o-227~ I urge the Board to stop the spraying, to step back and give the area the chance to recover on its own. Left alone, some cattails will certain revive in the wettest places, but in the drier areas hundreds of other kinds of plants will appear and thrive. The frogs and other creatures will recover, the area will evolve naturally into a healthy system. Stop spraying, allow the area to heal itself. Those of living along the berm have watched the desecration of the area patiently for about two years. In that time the situation has only grown worse. I appeal to you in the strongest possible terms. Stop spraying. Stop pumping water. Let the place heal itself. L~ it grow healthy and strong again. Sincerely yours, President ff 1.! 16J 1' Mr. James Ward Department Director Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 605 Laurel Oak Drive Naples, FL 34108 Dear Jim, On June 4, 2002, nineteen presidents, board members, and residents of five of the nine high rise associations, starting with St. Mar/ssa and continuing north to the Montenero, met to discuss the condition of the area west of the berm between the berm and the mangroves. These associations represent approximately one thousand units and over two thousand residents. All of the people present were profoundly disturbed by what has happened to the area. Of special concern is the loss of bird, animal, reptile, risk, and amphibian life fi.om the area, as well as the seriously degraded appearance of the area. The group has two requests to make of you. First, stop spraying the cattails now for the following reasons: 1). The permits issued by the EPA and the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers impose no requirement on you to eradicate the cattails. In fact on page 90 in the "Cattails" section, the wording is that "... no overt cattail eradication measure is proposed [in the Clam Bay Recovery And Management Plan (insert mine)] as a part of this Management Plan." 2) The group also asserts that repeated spraying is almost certainly extremely destructive to the smallest and most vulnerable forms of life that make up the base of the food chain which supports all other life. The areas where the spraying has been repeatedly carried out are silent as a grave. Where in past summers thousands of fi.ogs croaked, chipped, belled, and whistled, there are none to be heard. 3) The spraying is not accomplishing and cannot accomplish its goal of eradicating the cattails. Spraying is both destructive and a waste of money. 4) Finally, it has helped to make the area resemble a toxic waste sight. Second, a delegation of the group would like very much to meet with you and whomever you would like to bring to discuss what the PBSD's plans are for the area under discussion. If it works for you, the delegation would like to meet with you during the week of July 1 to July 5. The middle hours of the afternoon would probably be best. Because even the delegation is likely to be large, perhaps we should meet at the St. Pierre rather than in your office. If you can meet with us, please let me know which dates and times would be most convenient for you. I will then notify the group of the place and time of the meeting. Sincerely yours, Kinley Roby President 16J COLLIER COUNI GOVERNMENT 1 Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive · Suite 605 ° Naples, Florida 34108 ° (239) 597-1749 ° Fax (239) 597-4502 August 28, 2002 Mr. Kinley Roby, President St. Pierre Condominium Association, Inc. 6825 Grenadier Boulevard Naples, Florida 34108 Dear Mr. Roby: Thank you for your letter of August 17th regarding the Clam Bay Program. As you know, the Pelican Bay Services Division Board has established a Clam Bay Sub-committee for the purpose of reviewing, evaluating and recommending to the Pelican Bay Services Division Board, services and programs related to Clam Bay. The Sub-committee will schedule your correspondence and a review of this issue for consideration dudng the month of September. Once we have established a date, time and location for the meeting I will advise you, so that you may attend the meeting for review and discussion with the Sub-committee. Again my thanks for your interest in the Pelican Bay Services Division and if I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me. I the meantime I remain, ~..~ Yours sincerer, //' James P. Ward '¢:'¢ Division Administrator JPW/bcs Cc: Pelican Bay Services Division Board CLAM BAY MONITORING SUMMARY Memorandum to Clam Bay Sub-committee September 2002 Prepared by: Turrell and Associates 3584 Exchange Avenue Suite B Naples, Florida 34104 MEMORANDUM 16J From: Pelican Bay Services Division Clam Bay Sub-Committee Tim Hall Turrell and Associates Cc: Date: Subject: .lames P. Ward Kyle Lukasz September 9, 2002 CLAM BAY MONITORING SUMMARY Existing and Proposed Activities Introduction Throughout the current year monitoring and data collection has been underway within the Clam Bay System in accordance with the requirements outlined in the State and Federal Permits for the Division. This report summarizes the past and present responsibilities that are outlined in those permits for the Clam Bay System and outlines the purpose of work programs that have been proposed for the coming year. It should be pointed out that the bulk of the data collection, both required and proposed, would be included in the Annual Honitoring Report that is prepared in response to permit requirements. Project Description The description (i.e. purpose) of the Clam Bay Project in the permits issued by the State DEP and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is "to conduct activities to improve the hydrodynamics of, and thus restore and manage, the Clam Bay ecosystem by conducting activities in association with and specified by the Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan." Activities specifically addressed and allowed in the permit include: periodic dredging of Clam Pass and interior channels to maintain design depths conduct minor, small charge blasting of restricted interior channels 16J - deposit beach quality material on beaches adjacent to Clam Pass - replace culverts along Seagate Drive - conduct studies to determine sources for excess water discharge into the system - kill and remove nuisance exotic vegetation within the system - formulate an Upland Water Discharge Reduction Plan - implement the Upland Water Discharge Reduction Plan Clam Bay Restoration and Manaqement Plan Activities The following is a summary of the activities that are required each year to fulfill the goals or requirements set forth in the Management Plan. Turrell and Associates, Inc. has been charged with overseeing and managing these tasks in coordination with the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD). These activities (Items 1-4) are identified in the budget as "Clam Bay Restoration Program (Monitoring and Maintenance)" and are funded by Collier County's General Fund. Hydrographic monitoring and analysis of survey and tide gauge data. This work is conducted by Humiston and Moore Engineers and is done to ensure that the pass is maintaining itself and to judge whether or not additional dredging activities might be needed to keep the pass open and functioning. This data is also used to judge the effectiveness of past dredging activities by comparing pre- and post-dredging conditions. Funding Source: Collier County 2. Water Quality Monitoring. County staff collects this data and provides it to Wilson Miller for analysis. This analysis is used to judge the effectiveness of the surface water management system in removing nutrients and/or pollutants from surface waters before they enter the Clam Bay system. This information is also useful in determining whether or not any nutrient loading is occurring within the system and can be compared to mangrove health within these same areas. Funding Source: Collier County 16J 1 3. Biological Monitoring This information is gathered by two firms looking at slightly different parameters within the system. Lewis Environmental Services is involved with restoring and maintaining adequate hydrology within the initial die-off areas and Lewis Environmental have lately been looking at other stressed areas within the system as well to determine if additional channels would be effective. They have monitoring plots set up within the main die-off areas to ascertain the effectiveness of the hand dug channels in maintaining hydrology as well as to monitor recovery of mangroves within the excavated areas. In addition, Turrell and Associates also performs biological monitoring within the Clam Bay System. This includes biological monitoring plots, the bay bottoms (seagrasses), and the transitional area along the berm. Review of the annual aerial photograph and responses to resident's concerns throughout the year are the means of pinpointing additional stressed areas within the system Funding Source: Collier County 4. Annual Report. Turrell and Associates has been charged with collecting the data and analytical results from all of the involved firms and compiling this information into the Annual Report. The report preparation is generally started in October with a final draft being presented in mid to late November. Funding Source: Collier County Discretionary Activities Conducted to Date Several activities have been undertaken under the consultant's encouragement to either enhance the knowledge base regarding the system, or to enhance the biological diversity or integrity of the system. A summary of these activities is provided below. 16J 1 Study to divert development stormwater within the Clam Bay system. This investigation was commissioned by the PBSD and undertaken by Wilson Miller. The basis of the study was to determine the feasibility and cost of diverting stormwater between drainage systems within the Pelican Bay. The reason being that diversion to drainage systems closer to the Pass might result in quicker evacuation of run-off during storms and thus help alleviate prolonged inundation periods within the mangrove die-off areas. Before proceeding further with these modifications additional data is required regarding the impact that this rerouting may have on other parts of the Clam Bay System. Therefore this project is on hold until further action regarding the Hydrographic Study. Funding Source: Pelican Bay MSTBU 2. Removal of cattails along berm. This activity was undertaken to restore the vegetative diversity to an area that had been completely dominated by cattails. The removal of the cattails was performed as a proactive initiative to remove a mass of dead vegetation and the live cattails that produce this biomass. These cattails were no longer productive due to their previously unchecked growth and it was determined that the cattails should be removed before the area crashed either due to saltwater intrusion or increasingly poor water quality from the leaf litter build-up. As stated above, the removal process has been underway since April 2001 via repetitive herbicide spraying. The spraying has had limited success and the regrowth of the cattails in some areas has paced the spraying efforts. This initiative is still considered a sound scientific decision, however in light of increased resident dissatisfaction and complaints about the repeated spraying and appearance of this area we are recommending the discontinuance of the spraying efforts for control of the cattails. This will allow the cattails to reestablish in the area. To enhance the environmental health of this area, while allowing the cattails to grow, several levels of maintenance will be presented to the Clam Bay Sub-Committee for consideration. They will entail periodic removal of cattail biomass (leaves) to keep production higher in the system and keep excess decaying matter from 16J impacting water quality. (An information sheet on cattail benefits and problems is attached for review) Funding Source: Collier County Riley Mangroves. This activity consisted of funding a mangrove planting experiment within the main die-off area. Red mangrove propagules and black mangrove seeds were encased in plastic pipe above the ground elevation in an effort to protect them from elevated water levels during the rainy season. Currently it appears that as many as 50% of the seedlings are alive. Funding Source: Pelican Bay MSTBU Alternative Plantings This activity included mangrove plantings installed in the die-off area, planted on starter islands and at existing elevations. Also installed were various grasses and Buttonwoods. These mangroves to date are doing well and will continue to be monitored. Based on the current natural regeneration of the area, it is not felt that additional plantings are required at this time. Funding Source: Pelican Bay MSTBU Study and removal of Seagate Culvert flapgates. This activity is also currently under way, however Humiston and IVloore has requested that flow data be collected on spring and neap tides which would show the extreme ranges of the existing conditions. We are monitoring the current tides and will collect this data at the appropriate time. Once this information is collected, the gates will be removed, the data analyzed, and the appropriate reports provided to the Division. Funding Source: Pelican Bay MSTBU Canoe Trail and educational material. This activity consisted of installing directional signage in the System waterways to direct recreational canoeists and boaters through the area. 1 16J Funding Source: Pelican Bay MS'rBU Additional Proposed Work To date, most of the work being done within the system has been monitoring of the existing conditions and examining reactions of the system to experimental work that has been done more or less on a trial and error basis. This work includes the drainage/flushing channels, planted starter islands, debris (dead material) removal, and dune recovery around the dredge area. While all of the information gathered to date is helpful in estimating how the system will react to change, it does not provide the solid background data needed to make informed decisions regarding large scale changes to the system. There is also very little information available regarding either the normal or the extreme conditions that occur within the system with regards to water levels or duration of inundation within the differing communities. There is also no complete information regarding the bathymetric condition of the system or the tidal differences within the system. The additional work that has been proposed would collect some of this background information and would allow for more informed decision making and could potentially highlight other areas of concern or suggest solutions to some areas within the system. The following programs are being put forth for consideration by the Pelican Bay Board to be undertaken within the upcoming fiscal year. 1. Hydrodynamic Modeling Project Consultant: Humiston and Moore Engineers The inflows of fresh water from the surface water management system and its affects on the mangrove communities has been discussed since the upland development was first proposed. The purpose of the hydrodynamic modeling of Clam Bay is to evaluate the dependence of water levels in the bay on fresh water inflow into the estuary. This information may then be correlated with salinity data and biological data on the vitality of the mangrove community in an effort to determine how retention of freshwater in the inner bay system may be related to mangrove health. Additionally, the model may be used to predict how modifications to freshwater inflow, such as diversion of flow northward to Vanderbilt lagoon, will affect the Clam Bay estuary. The modeling consists of two primary elements: 11 6 16J Calibration and Prediction. The Calibration stage includes the simulation of the existing tidal and freshwater circulation within the bay system. The available tide data, water levels, water depths and freshwater discharge will be used to calibrate the model. The calibrated model will be used in the Prediction stage to simulate the estuary system under proposed drainage system modifications. The model results will determine the expected water level fluctuations in the mangrove area after the freshwater drainage diversion. The biologists, using these data in conjunction with the water level monitoring data in Proposed Task 3 below, will be able to use this information to anticipate potential impacts to the mangroves, and to optimize design of the flushing cuts. The calibrated model will also provide a valuable tool to evaluate future alternatives. The :[999 dredging of Clam Pass has significantly improved tidal flushing of the Bay. The model would enable the consultants to evaluate other improvements that may need to be considered to further enhance water quality in the estuary. Changes to the surface water flows both by re-directing water within the system and by re-opening a connection with Vanderbilt Lagoon to the north have been discussed and preliminarily studied. The proposed hydrodynamic analysis would be essential in determining the feasibility of either of these measures but would also be very useful for predicting expected conditions within the system under a myriad of proposed conditions. In short, this study would produce a planning tool that will help your consultants to better advise the Board regarding future conditions of, or proposals for, the Clam Bay system. What this study will not produce is a water budget that tracks all inflows and outflows into the system. It is not designed to quantify ground water inflows or to estimate evaporation or transpiration outflows. Funding Source and Amount: Pelican Bay MSTBU, $70,000 Dune Restoration This activity is for restoration of the dune system within Clam Bay. l~n order to protect the dune systems integrity from possible structural failure, creating a break through of the dune from the 16J Gulf of Mexico to the Clam Bay System, a permit application has been submitted to the regulatory agencies for restoration activities. Funds have been budgeted for this work beginning in fiscal year 2003. A plan has been attached identifying the recommended area for dune restoration and associated planting plan for FY 2003. Funding Source: Collier County Water Level Monitoring Within Znner Mangroves Project Consultant: Turrell and Associates (Final Data Review will include Lewis Environmental) This task would entail placement of several water level loggers within the mangroves and away from open water. These loggers can record both sub-surficial as well as surficial water levels at intervals from once a second to once a day. This information would be useful to determine the periods of inundation within the mangrove systems and the recovery times in these same areas after storms to see how quickly water levels return to before-storm levels. Data collection would occur in both healthy and stressed areas and compared to see if vegetative stress can be correlated to differences in recovery from inundation, tn conjunction with the hydrodynamic analysis proposed above, a clearer picture of the way water within the system behaves and reacts to environmental factors can be established. This is important in decision making but also essential to judging the current and future effectiveness of the recovery efforts. An example of the usefulness of this information is that if we had had this data and the hydrodynamic model in hand, we would have had a better idea of the water levels and inundation expected in the cattail area prior to the removal efforts. Funding Source and Amount: Pelican Bay MSTBU, $10,000 Additional Flushing Channels Project Consultant: Lewis Environmental Services While the cause of the die-off has not been positively identified, it appears that the flushing cuts put in to date are helping with the 16,1 recovery of the die-off area and are definitely helping to move water through the system more rapidly. Additional cuts will be considered to expedite the conveyance of water through the mangroves to address any water management modifications implemented. Additional cuts in areas known to be ponding water are also proposed under this component. Funding Source and Amount: Pelican Bay MSTBU, $13,200 Hard bottom Survey Project Consultant: Turrell and Associates To date there have been no formal investigations of the offshore hard bottom habitat. The only known factor is that it exists and will need to be considered and protected should any beach re- nourishment project be contemplated in the future. Though not required by the regulatory agencies in work activities to date, these agencies have continually expressed concern for this natural resource. Therefore, it is recommended that data of existing conditions be collected so historic documentation is available in the event that this is ever identified as being degraded due to dredging or dune re-nourishment activities. The proposal maps the location of these areas along the beach and documents major components of the floral and faunal composition of the areas. Annual studies of this community in addition to the currently ongoing studies would also be useful in gauging overall health of the ecosystem. Funding Source and Amount: Collier County, $3,000 Why Undertake New Studies? The Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan contains a list of goals and protocols that were established by the PBSD early on in the process and which are the basis for the work that has already been undertaken as well as for any future work. These goals include; restoring the habitat values of the Clam Bay ecosystem and diversifying the same, restoring the hydrology and tidal flushing to Clam Pass and interior creeks, - developing a contingency plan for continued maintenance of Clam Pass and the interior creeks, 9 16J accelerating re-vegetation of barren areas by planting appropriate species of plants, developing operational protocols that allow the flexibility to respond to changing circumstances. The importance of starting the collection of additional information now is to create a basis of knowledge that, coupled with the information currently being gathered, can be used to determine general trends throughout the system. :it can also be used to gauge the effectiveness of management methods with more clarity than is now occurring. These new studies are not proposed to correct or ameliorate any immediate problem. They are proposed to generate information to assist in future decision making. The Board can choose not to have the work done and nothing in the Clam Bay system will change as a result. The Board can save some money if it decides not to spend the funds requested to conduct the studies. The downside to this is that if something unforeseen happens in the system, such as an unexplained die-off, this data would not be available as an aid in trying to identify a possible cause. Or, if the Board decides to conduct some activity in the future and asks the consultants for opinions of how the activity might affect the system, all we will be able to offer are opinions based on best guesses rather than on hard data. We know that this has been an ongoing source of frustration for the Board and is the major reason the new studies were proposed. The residents of Pelican Bay have a substantial investment in their properties and part of that value has to be attributed to the health and long-term viability of the Clam Bay ecosystem. The ongoing and proposed studies are a means of gathering vital information that will help to maintain and protect the system in the future. Sound and current scientific knowledge is essential if rational and effective management decisions are to be made concerning the health and viability of the Clam Bay ecosystem. 1 10 INFORMATION SHEET ON CATTAILS (Tvt~ha st~t~.) IN THE CLAM BAY ECOSYSTEM 16J Plant Description: The cattail is probably the most familiar of all wetland plants. Their brown flowering pods can be seen at the edges of ponds, rivers, lakes, or just about any place where there is shallow standing water for a portion of the year. Cattails are tall erect plants which can grow up to 9 feet high. They have two different methods of reproduction. The first is through vegetative shoots from spreading roots. In laboratory conditions, a single seedling has been shown to produce as many as 98 vegetative shoots in a single year. The second method of regeneration is prolific seed dispersal. Studies have shown ranges from 20,000 to as high as 700,000 seeds produced per plant. And germination rates under favorable conditions can approach 100%. Ecolo~,v: The cattail has its place in the wetland ecosystem. It provides places for nesting and protective cover for several animal species. The plant and its flowers are edible during certain stages of growth. It was also widely used by Native Americans for a variety of types of weaving. It is believed to be a natural component of the Everglades ecosystem that naturally occurred in widely scattered diffuse stands. However, changes to natural systems either through disruptions in hydrology or nutrient loading has led to rampant cattail growth and spread throughout south Florida. Impacts: Because of the rapid growth rates of cattails and the prolific seed production, this plant can rapidly take over areas to the exclusion of all other plants. Cattails colonies in south Florida have been observed to expand as much as 17 feet in a single year. This means that a 50-foot diameter area (0.04 acres) could expand to 220-foot diameter (0.90 acres) within five years. Its uncontrolled growth can lead to the clogging of waterways, closing of open water habitats, elimination of habitat and species diversity, declines in water quality, and reducing the opportunity for other plant species to become established and survive. Cattails are so successful because they form extensive monocultures very rapidly and maintain their dominance with the formation of dense rhizome (root) mats and leaf litter. Aside from its prolific growth, the cattail has also been shown to release chemical compounds that can prevent the growth of other species. This "allelopathic" property is another means by which the cattail is able to out-compete other species and take over areas that would normally contain a variety of plant species. Page 1 of 2 16J 1 ManaRement: Almost all studies indicate that control of cattails is an important component when trying to manage natural wetland habitats and promote species diversity. The basic goals of cattail management should be: - To control the spread and domination of cattail into adjacent natural areas, - To prevent declines in other species from cattail proliferation, - To prevent the development of monotypic cattail growth and loss of habitat diversity. Management of cattails is always site specific and methods that work in one instance may not work in others. Different management alternatives include hand cutting of roots and stalks, burning, flooding, shading, chemical treatment, and mechanical removal. We initially sprayed and cut the stalks in April of last year and have since been selectively spraying cattail regrowth on an as needed schedule. While some areas responded well to this methodology, others have kept pace with the spraying and are still well established. Planting has been delayed until the cattail control and eradication efforts were completed. Residents concems over the appearance of the cattail area and Board concerns as to the time taken to date on this activity have led us to recommend a change in the management techniques being used in this area. Herbicide spraying efforts are recommended to be discontinued and allow regeneration of the area for the next few years. When the cattails have reached the point where water and habitat quality is being adversely affected, hand cutting and thinning of areas will need to be undertaken. We believe that this can be done successively so that visual impacts are minimized while management goals are still achieved. If 1/3 of the area is done each year it is estimated that the cost would be approximately $50,000 - $70,000 per year. This would start once the cattails re-establish dominance, most likely three to four years from now. Any areas in which vegetation does not re-establish will be planted with the plant palette previously provided to the Board. This should allow the area to have ample re- growth and "be green" in time for the tourist season. Another option being explored is mechanical removal of the cattails and the underlying muck and decaying leaf litter. Budgetary constraints make this option not feasible at this time. However, should additional funds become available, this option may be suggested to the Board for consideration. It would be a long and expensive process that would require additional permits to dredge the material out and could require placement of clean fill to restore the wetland elevations and replanting of the area. The budget could be as high $1,500,000 - $2,000,000. Page 2 of 2 16J 1 mm mm mm mm mmmmmm~ HUMISTON ~ MOORI~ COASTAL ENGI~'~.ERING DESIGN AND PERMITTING MO UMENT PI IOFILE LOCATIONS FOR: PEUCAN BAY SERVICES AERIAL-A JOB: 12-007 NONE FIGURE: 5679 STRAND COURT NAPLES, FL 54110 FAX: 259 594 2025 PHONE: 259 594 2021 16J .1 16J ~ 16J 1 16J 1 Memorandum 16J 11 To: From: Date: Subject: Pelican Bay Services Division Board James P. Ward September 9, 2002 June 12, 2002 Meeting Minutes Attached are the Minutes of the June 12, 2202 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Meeting for your reference. Pelican Bay Services MINUTES PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD MEETING June 12, 2002 Naples, Florida 16J 1_! LET IT BE KNOWN, that the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met in Special Session on this date, June 12, 2002 at 2:00 P.M. at Hammock Oak Center, 8962 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present: Mr. Lou Vlasho (Chairman) Mr. Joseph Bawduniak (Absent) Mr. Thomas Brown Mr. James Burke Mr. James Carroll Mr. John Domenie Mr. Glen Harrell Mr. David Roellig Mr. Christopher Sutphin (Late arrival) Mr. George Werner ALSO PRESENT: Approximately thirty-five (35) Pelican Bay residents; Collier County Commissioner James D. Carter, Ph.D.; Messrs. Todd Turrell and Tim Hall, Turrell & Associates; Mr. James P. Ward, Department Director, Pelican Bay Services Division; Mr. Kyle Lukasz, Field Manager, Pelican Bay Services Division and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Clam Bay Program - Policy Direction 3. Presentation of Fiscal Year 2003 Budget 4. Audience Participation 5. Committee Requests 6. Adjourn ROLLCALL Mr. Vlasho called the meeting to order and asked that the record show Mr. Joseph Bawduniak with an excused absence and Christopher Sutphin with a late arrival. CLAM BAY PROGRAM - POLICY DIRECTION Mr. Vlasho stated that this item was placed on the agenda in order for Staff to establish a policy direction for the Clam Bay Sub-committee. I would like to allow our consultants to make their presentation in whatever depth they choose and then the Board can ask their questions of the consultants. When the Board is finished, I will receive comments or questions from the audience, then we will go back to see if we can come to some conclusion. Mr. Ward stated that Messrs. Tim Hall and Todd Turrell are here representing the Turrell & Associates consulting team. Mr. Turrell is the Project Manager for this project and has been 4872 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 requested by Staff to be in attendance today, in order to assist you through the policy direction that we are going to consider. Mr. Turrell explained that Turrell & Associates was hired to construct the Clam Bay Project and do all of the monitoring that the State and Federal government required, after the Clam Bay Project was designed and permitted by Mr. Ted Brown and company. We were able to construct it under budget and since that time we have been monitoring and keeping the State and Federal government happy. Of course there is the ongoing monitoring and improvements and what can we do to make it even better? I can tell you that the main die off area looks better than it has at any time during the previous three or four years. Summer is when we have historically experienced the bad die off because we did not believe that the water was getting out. The water would pond and get so hot that it would cook anything standing in it. Over the last eighteen months that Mr. Lewis has been cutting tidal channels, it is draining better than it ever has. We are hopeful that the water will not impound in those areas this summer. Consequently, instead of it being the dead and the dying out there, now you see tens of thousands of new mangrove sprouts, a lot of Batis, Fiddler crabs and life, whereas before it was dead. This summer is the critical time. Everybody should keep their fingers crossed and knock-on-wood that all of our efforts may be starting to pay off. Mother Nature is a difficult thing who does pretty much as she chooses and man's intervention is sometimes successful and at other times it isn't. However, I am pleased and I believe we are starting to see some success. We have a lot of scientific research that I believe needs to continue and to a certain extent, we are obligated for it to continue. The Board came up with some ideas for some proactive science that I think the project warrants. Mr. Tim Hall explained that one of the things we were asked to provide is an overview of what is currently happening and what we hope to do. There are several different projects going on within the Clam Bay system that this Board is privy to and making decisions on. The major one is monitoring the re-growth in the die off area; what is happening over time with the re- establishment of the vegetation and how well it is able to support itself for long-term viability. In conjunction with the work we are doing, Ms. Worley from the Conservancy and Mr. Robin Lewis 4873 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 are also doing work. Some of Mr. Lewis' work is visible to the people in the Strand where he has been in charge of the excavation and placement of all of the tidal channels to help move the freshwater out of that area during the rainy season. The channels that were put in over the past year will be able to test the system this year. This will be the first full rainy season that we will go through with those channels in place. Mr. Hall continued that one of the other areas that we are working on is the cattail removal and re-establishment of the native vegetation in the area along the berm. That is on going and there has been a lot less re-growth of the cattails. Mr. Lukasz has been heading the maintenance of that area and having it re-sprayed when necessary. It appears there are areas ready for replanting and other areas where hand removal of the few remaining cattails could be done before those areas would be ready for replanting. There are also some areas that still need additional treatment before we would recommend any replanting. Mr. Hall reported that the restoration of the dunes along the beach from Clam Pass to the Ritz Carlton Hotel is underway. Applications for permits have been submitted to do that restoration. We have not received the comments back from the State agency regarding those applications, but they should be forthcoming within the next week or so. Mr. Hall explained that we are also keeping a close eye on the mangroves outside of the die off area, more specifically two or three areas, which are showing signs of additional stress. There has been some leaf loss, color loss and diminishing of the prop roots in some of those areas. We are trying to keep a close eye to monitor how those areas are doing to see where the water levels sit and how the trees are reacting to what is going on around them, especially during this rainy season. That is where we are with the on-going activities. Mr. Hall continued that at the same time we are trying to get a little more detailed information to be able to answer some of the questions that we have been asked over the past couple of years, such as how high does the water get and how long does it stay that high, what is the duration of the inundation, what is the salinity and how far up does the salinity get? None of that information has been included in the on-going monitoring activities and is the additional 4874 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 1_I information that we are trying to get to add to the base that we have, to be able to make future decisions. Mr. Turrell stated that the success that we are encouraged about is in the die off area. There are several areas that we are concerned about that we are watching closely and trying to figure out what is going on. It is not an easy thing. We have a very complicated set of situations here and there are a lot of additional data and work required if we are really going to get ahead of it or stay ahead of it and is what our budget and proposals evolve around. This year we need to get ahead of this as best we can by involving the best people in the State. We don't know everything and that is why we appreciate the Conservancy's involvement, Mr. Lewis' help and the help of everybody else that is working on this project. We are not "know-it-ails"; we are just trying to do a good job. Mr. Roellig stated that the Board received copies of an article on Mangroves from the University of Florida. I am not big on excuses, but some of the problems that this paper points out, for instance, is where various mangroves will live and quoting from the paper, "Detailed studies for an area can be contradicted by equally precise studies of the same species in a different area". Talking about succession from an immature forest to a final forest the paper states, "The ecological requirements of many species are ambiguous, with studies of the same species in different regions often yielding conflicting results". The point is that I don't feel embarrassed that we are feeling our way along. I think the paper indicates very strongly that you have to look at every location individually and you can't necessarily apply things you have learned in one location to another location in the State. It is true that I believe we are in a trial and error mode and I concur that we have had vigorous re-growth, particularly in the die off area. People should be aware that the funds we are talking about spending from the Pelican Bay area are in the order of magnitude of what we spend supporting the restaurants and the tennis program. You have to compare apples to apples and we have to compare amenities to see whether or not you want to put the kind of resource into the mangroves that we would into the restaurants and other areas. We all realize that we have a forest here. If you have a flower garden and the flowers die, you can tear them out and replant them and within four to five months you will have beautiful 4875 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 1_6J flowers again. Once a forest dies off, you are talking years and years to get it to regenerate and that is something we need to keep in perspective. I realize we have had a lot of reports of plusses and minuses, fortunately every year we do a comprehensive report and I presume next month we will be doing the aerial photography again. After those aerials, regeneration and additional die offs can be analyzed. I am cautiously optimistic that we are headed in the right direction. (Mr, SUTPHIN JOINED THE MEETING AT 2:20 P.M.) Mr. Brown stated that we have spent $2,000,000-$3,000,000 so far, and here is another proposal for $165,000 and asked why weren't these studies done before? Mr. Hall replied that the budget we have is for additional studies that aren't required as part of the permitting. The permits require analysis of the forest system in the die off areas and annual monitoring. The additional studies are for work that is not a requirement of the permit, which is what is being done now, and is to gather additional information to help support decisions that the Board has been trying to make regarding the system. Mr. Turrell stated that they were not done earlier because before my involvement, when the mangroves died and everyone wanted to study it, there was $500,000 spent on studies. You did spend a lot of money up front on studies. Now, this is a kind of "after we have tried to fix it, how do we make it better" type study. The original studies were "what happened". There have been a lot of studies and it is somewhat like a moving target. I don't think anybody is going ever going to say, "this is exactly what happened out there" and that goes for my firm also, but we all have our suspicions. Mr. Brown asked if this was the last study, or is this an annuity program where there has to be a study every year? Mr. Turrell replied, "You can cut the studies off anytime you want, it depends on how important these mangroves are to you". Mr. Brown stated that you do a study and you find something, what exactly would be the result of your findings, what would you come up with? 4876 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J Mr. Turrell replied, "Possibly a way to enhance the livelihood of one of the die off areas that we are concerned with". Possibly finding out what is going on in there and planning a solution to that problem before it ends up being a huge dead area like we have already experienced. Mr. Hall stated that part of what is included in the Proposal is a hydrographic analysis of the Clam Bay system so that the questions such as, what happens if we reconnect Vanderbilt Lagoon and are able to allow some of the freshwater that is generated on this side of the road to go through that underpass will affect that system, can be answered? We don't know right now because we don't know the hydrologic baseline of the system. The other question is, what happens if we try to shift some of the freshwater within the system so that it enters further south? Those are questions that we have been asked, that we can't give definitive answers to because we don't have the background information or models that we need. Mr. Brown asked if you mentioned that these studies include the area right up against Vanderbilt Beach Road? Mr. Hall replied, "The studies we are proposing include additional monitoring in the mangrove areas". They include looking for and potentially putting in additional channels to allow water to move through some of the mangrove areas a little quicker. It also includes the calibration and formation of the hydrographic model for the system. Mr. Brown asked if that includes the area right next to Vanderbilt Beach Road? Mr. Turrell replied, "There are a lot of things included in this budget that I see as critical and definitely need to happen this year". This study, which is one of the more expensive ones at approximately $70,000, is to do the modeling, which is very complicated and would be to look at the affects of reconnecting to Vanderbilt Lagoon. It is looking at the entire hydrological system, what the water elevations are doing and what would happen if we reconnected to Vanderbilt Lagoon. I want everyone to be perfectly clear on what we are talking about since this has always been such a "hot potato". Right now all of the fresh water that collects in the northern part of Pelican Bay and used to go out Wiggins Pass cannot any more because the connection to Vanderbilt Lagoon was cut off years ago. Now the fresh water comes through Anhinga Pond, into 4877 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 the driveways under the Ritz Carlton and eventually ends up going into Upper Clam Bay. If you were to do this reconnect boats are not going to end up in the Pelican Bay system, they cannot get there. If you made it big enough for boats to get into that area, they would get into Anhinga Pond and that is all the further they could go, so there would be no boating impact. What Pelican Bay benefits from is getting rid of some of their fresh water, but there are questions about if you divert that fresh water, what happens to all of the fresh water that used to drive down through this area? That study is one of the more expensive ones and if you wanted to wait a year on that, it is not a big deal to us. The things that are big deals to us are looking at the areas that are threatened, some of the brown areas that have shown up and making sure that we are moving in the right direction and then the studies that are required by the State and Federal government. Those are the really critical things that need to be done. Mr. Brown stated that you are talking about a study to perhaps open Vanderbilt Beach Road and at the same time we are being told that the flap gates at Seagate should be closed. Mr. Turrell replied, "Those issues are completely unrelated". What is good at Seagate has nothing to do with Vanderbilt Beach. Those flap gates were done to try to enhance the tidal prism of Clam Pass. You are not going to affect the tidal prism in the Upper Bay with the flap gates. The water exchange is so little between Upper Clam Bay and Clam Pass that flap gates would not make any sense. They are different issues. There is a concern if you take all of the fresh water that goes out Clam Pass. Right now are you taking away some of the water that goes, not into, but out of Clam Pass and that happens when it is raining during July and August and we have never had a pass closure problem then. The pass has closed during February and March when there is little water moving out the pass. If we diverted some of the fresh water, is it going to hurt Clam Pass? Probably not, but we need a study and modeling to show us that. Is it going to help the mangroves? Maybe, we hope, but certainly there is more water than used to go in there, so maybe we are doing something that isn't quite right from nature's standpoint. These are big picture questions and only God knows the answer. We just try to get the best scientists involved and try to manage your system. This system did not used to have condominiums all the 4878 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 way around it. This system used to have sheet flow across natural lands and when you box it in you change things. Mr. Brown stated that sounds like the study that the people in Vanderbilt Beach wanted to do some time ago. Mr. Turrell replied, "There has been talk for years about that reconnection, probably ever since it got cut off". The study is to see what the effects of a reconnect would be and not specifically to open it. The study includes the whole Clam Bay system and not just Vanderbilt Lagoon. Mr. Werner stated that my concern is whether we should be doing these studies or should we be waiting to see how the system is going to react to what we have done already and what we are going to continue to do with regard to the maintenance of the channels, plus cutting some additional channels. If this Board if looking at these studies, this Board has to be willing, if the studies come out as being beneficial, to spend in the neighborhood of a couple of million dollars more on this system as far as the reconnect, cleaning out Anhinga Pond, moving the conveyance from System IV to System III, etc. The question I have is if we didn't do anything other than the maintenance and the additional channels that have been proposed and not do the hydrographic study or the conveyance from System IV to System III, is there any way you can tell us that is going to be detrimental or beneficial to the system? Mr. Turrell replied, ~No, only God knows that answer". I can tell you that you will have less data and information from which to make decisions. As far as I am concerned, the more information the better because we are already shooting in the dark and we need to try to turn some lights on here and there. Mr. Wemer stated that my idea is that I don't care whether the salinity is 6 points or 12 points or if the tide range is 3 or 6 inches, as long as the system is healthy. Mr. Turrell stated that a lot of the studies don't really do anything for you. I don't quite know how to couch that, but occasionally when you are doing studies you run across something, but 99 out of 100 pages is science and might be interesting for a scientist, but would bore you to death. Somewhere hidden in that data might be the answer or might be an answer to one 4879 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 specific problem and you don't know until you study it. That is the nature of studies. Are they great values, probably not? Are they necessary? That decision is up to you, it is your money. If you want to know less, don't do them. Mr. Harrell stated that there is an old saying that "half of your advertising dollars are wasted and if you just knew which half you could save them". It does seem that more information is good. It is going to be impossible to put a value on the studies, although we could probably do it afterwards. It does seem that if we have re-growth we are moving in the right direction and that if we are committed to this program long-term, we need to gather as much data as we can and be economically responsible. Mr. Turrell stated that since I used to live in Vanderbilt I have been associated with the reconnection to Vanderbilt Lagoon and the benefit to Vanderbilt Lagoon is that it would get some habitat. There are also some benefits to Pelican Bay. The reason I mentioned that is that when it comes time to build the reconnection, I don't think that Pelican Bay should pay for all of it. If it is ever decided that reconnection should be built, which I am out of it, I think that should be a Commissioner Carter driven project and the County figures it out. There are people who would benefit and if you were to do a nice box culvert, that would be a great thing for the County and North Naples and have some benefit to Pelican Bay and possibly Pelican Bay would participate. Mr. Sutphin stated that I am concerned about the level of spending and I asked the question a month ago if we could quantify the downside risk of freezing capital spending and simply continuing to maintain those improvements that are currently in place? That appears to be difficult from a quantitative measurement standpoint. At a minimum I would have liked a qualitative assessment. Opinions are cheap and therefore we should get plenty of them. My broader concern is that when we look at this budget process, in looking at these bits and pieces, each and every one of them seems to make sense on a stand-alone basis. No one is accusing anyone of squandering money. The consulting studies that we have paid for have produced what we have asked for. My concern is do we know what it is that we are trying to do? One example from the papers in front of me is that the proposed budget has an umbrella plan called the Clam Bay Restoration Project, that I guess has been in existence for a long time. Restoration means to 4880 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J bring something back to a state that existed at some identifiable point in the past. Do we have that measurement quantitatively and qualitatively and exactly what it is that we are trying to do? Do we have channel depths, water depths, water flows, numbers of trees per acre and what does it cost to get there? Is it even feasible to consider a restoration project? I don't have the answer to that, but that is what we call it and what we are being asked to fund. I am looking at a letter from the residents of the Coronado who want us to continue to improve and manage the mangrove forest. That is not restoration, which is a very different task that requires a different level of funding and a different set of priorities. I ask again, what is it we are trying to accomplish? Until I know that, I can't in good conscience vote to spend anything? Mr. Hall stated that your definition of restoration is correct. As far as it applies to this system, it is very apparent in two areas that this system is no longer in its' natural state, which are the die off area and the area where the cattails had taken over completely. These two areas are where we are concentrating most of our efforts to restore them to the native communities appropriate to that site. The die off area is borderline right now, but based on the present re- growth, the regeneration is back towards the mangrove forest. In the cattail area, because of the work that was done there with the construction of the berm, that area is going to be more towards restoring mangroves and marsh communities. The other aspect is that the system as a whole has generally been seen to be in decline over the past few years, based on the cattails and the stress that has been showing in some of the other mangrove areas. It kind of depends upon how you look at your definition of restoration. Are you trying to restore just those areas that went bad or are you trying to restore the system as a whole, to be self supporting and viable? Mr. Sutphin replied, "1 don't know". Mr. Hall stated that the way we are looking at it is the second, which is to try to figure out what is going on with the system and to try to get it to a state of where it is self supporting and viable. Mr. Sutphin stated that the comment you made about evidence of new mangrove growth and progress being made toward an environmentally stable system gets to my first question of can you quantify the downside risk in that area where things have been done and trees are now 4881 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 growing? Can you say that now we are going to maintain what we have done, watch it for two years and see what happens and we are not going to invest any more capital funds to physically move things around, digging marshes, dredging channels, planting seedlings and let nature go to work? Mr. Hall replied, "The downside risk in a short sentence is, if something goes wrong we may not know why". You are going to ask us why and we may not be able to give you that answer. The reason is that a lot of the work that has been done out there has been done without some of the background information that you might normally want. Some of the studies that we are proposing are to try to get a handle on and try to augment that background or baseline information. Mr. Sutphin stated that this is knowledge for as much as an insurance policy as it is to provide information to allow us to do efficient work. Mr. Hall replied, "That is correct". If the system keeps growing like it is and the plants are regenerating at the rate that they have been and nothing happens, that is great and then what we have done has been correct. The information we are gathering is that there are still some areas that are showing minimal signs of stress and we haven't been through a full rainy season, so we don't know how the system will react over a full year. If the water is still pooling out there, or if there is something else that happens and we haven't got anymore of this information, we are at the same point that we are right now. You are going to be asking questions and we are going to say that we believe it is this, but we don't have all of the background information that we may need to prove or disprove that. Mr. Domenie stated that he wanted to pass around pictures showing the success story of the osprey nest in Pelican Bay. The young are camera shy, but it is a success story. The name of the ten-year plan is the Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan and that should answer some of the questions. Our consultants are scheduled to make a survey after the rainy season to monitor what has happened to the starter islands as well as the encasements, is that right? 4882 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 Mr. Turrell replied, "We have money in our budget to get out there right now, as soon as we are given the go ahead". The monthly retainer is to get out there right now and look at it before the rainy season. Mr. Domenie stated that as far as I knew it was only annual. As you have said, the die off may occur during the rainy season and I feel we should be out there now making a detailed survey and then another one in November. If we only go in November, you won't know what to attribute it to if there is a die off. When do you plan on being out there? Mr. Turrell replied, "July and August". Mr. Domenie stated that is already the start of the rainy season, why not June 157 Mr. Turrell replied, "We have not been told to proceed". Mr. Domenie asked if we have to tell you to proceed? Mr. Turrell replied, "Yes, we are under contract to do what is required by the State of Florida, which is one annual report". We have recommended to you that we get out there monthly and we have a budget whereby we can dedicate staff resources weekly to do the exact things you are talking about. We have not been authorized to do that by your Board. With today's budget we can do it and we can start tomorrow. Mr. Domenie asked, is there any problem with that Mr. Ward? I would like to see a survey now, island by island, to see what is growing now and then in November we can tell if a die off occurred before or after the rainy season, is that a problem? Mr. Ward replied, UYou need to get through your debates today before you make that decision. Mr. Werner stated that the proposed studies are for next year's budget, which doesn't start until October 1, so there would have to be some adjustment in this year's budget. Mr. Domenie stated that I am sure that we have some item that could spare $1,000 for that work. Regarding the interior channels, do we have any indication where some of these new channels might be dug or did we just plug in a figure based on previous channels dug? Mr. Hall replied, "Some of the areas have already been identified, marked and are being looked at". The survey is still going on, but my rough guess would be somewhere is the 4883 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J neighborhood of 12,000-15,000 feet is what is out there right now. That is running from the cattail areas to the bays and crisscrossing through the die of area. Mr. Domenie stated that I have been asking for that survey for twelve months. I am saying that today, even our consultants don't know what is out there. Mr. Turrell replied, "Because the survey has not yet been finished". Mr. Domenie stated that you do not now what is out there. Mr. Turrell replied, "We do, we have it on maps". Mr. Domenie stated that I would love to see a map. Mr. Lukasz stated that we budget a certain amount of money each year and the engineering fees are to do the specific locations of those channels. A lot of it is based on stressed areas that start to develop during the course of the year. We have funds in the budget to address getting channels to those areas. Mr. Domenie stated that you refer to fresh water running from System VI and V, but at the moment it is running into Clam Bay. You refer to it as fresh water and that the study would perhaps affect that. Why are you concerned about fresh water when Mr. Lewis says that mangroves will grow in fresh water, saltwater or brackish water? What is the problem with the fresh water running down there? Mr. Hall replied, "1 would have the same problem if it was saltwater". The problem in the die off areas is that the general consensus has been the fact that the water has been too high, not that it has been fresh water or saltwater. There is a species composition swing that can happen in certain areas if you get more fresh water than saltwater you can go more towards a fresh water system. In this case, it is fresh water and I would have the same concerns if it were saltwater, if the water wasn't draining out. Mr. Domenie stated that I have asked the question many times about the salinity of the water along the berm or anywhere and you said you could do that in five minutes. Why haven't we done that? When we got rid of the cattails it was because they were invasive and the saltwater was going to kill them anyway. I have not seen any evidence and I would love to see some simple readings of saltwater content along that berm. 4884 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 Mr. Hall replied, "The times I have measured it, so far there has been no saltwater content along the berm". Mr. Domenie stated that removing the cattails was an absolute failure. Mr. Hall replied, "No, it has not been a failure because we have not experienced our highest tides yet". Mr. Domenie stated that the high tides come during the rainy season, so you are going to have more fresh water there. Mr. Turrell replied, '~/e have been over this before". My comment was the fact that if you get 7ppm saltwater in that area it will kill the cattails and was not the specific purpose of cutting those channels. The specific purpose was to get rid of the cattails, which we have done. I was hopeful that by cutting those channels that we might get 7ppm saltwater. We haven't yet, we might still, it might take a storm, we don't know. That was never guaranteed because never in my mind did I know if it was going to happen or not. I was never sure, I just simply pointed out that if we do get 7ppm of saltwater that would take care of the cattails, because I have done it before. Mr. Werner asked why you would want to remove the cattails? Mr. Turrell replied, "The whole reason that your State government is spending hundreds of millions of dollars is because cattails, from a biological standpoint, are not that productive. Getting rid of those cattails and replacing them with a more productive plant is to the benefit of Pelican Bay. Mr. Hall stated that cattails are a good plant in a mixed community and they are actually used in some water treatment areas for nutrient uptake, but what happens is that they grow very rapidly the first couple of years and then they have to be harvested. After their second or third year they will have grown so dense that there isn't a whole lot of re-growth and they are packed so tightly that the sunlight cannot penetrate the water's surface. After that second or third year the water quality starts to decline rapidly due to the lack of photosynthesis, productivity and the general degradation of the water around them. There have been a lot of studies done that show more diverse systems, in the long-term, are better for water quality and nutrient removal. Rather 4885 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 lbJ than have to go through and harvest those cattails every second or third year, it is more viable to put in a natural system that is more diverse and that is what we are working towards. Mr. Domenie stated that along the beach I have seen little red flags, is that part of the dune restoration study? A gentleman from the audience stated that they are flags that have been used to mark false sea turtle crawls. Mr. Burke stated that I have become kind of dangerous when it comes to these mangroves. This publication turned me on to a number of web pages. I have made the assumption all along that what we are trying to avoid is another die off like the one in the Strand. That is the big downside risk, but I have also become a mangrove watcher from ground level and above. You do not have to be a rocket scientist to know that the die off at the Strand is manmade. All my readings say that man is the biggest threat to mangroves. Mr. Turrell replied, '9 am not saying that man had nothing to do with that, but you have to go back to Mr. Roessler's original Environmental Impact Statement which said the mangroves were already dying there". It makes sense that man may have had the last little push. Mr. Burke stated that area appeared to be more than stressed it looked like a war zone. It has improved somewhat now that there are things growing. It also appears that the consensus is that moving the water in and out may be the ultimate solution. Mr. Turrell replied, "That is correct". That is why we are focusing a lot of our energy on doing these cuts. Mr. Burke asked what are you going to be looking for at the end of the rainy season? Mr. Hall replied, "There are four groups that have test plots out there". Ms. Worley of the Conservancy has her plots, Mr. Lewis has plots and Mr. Riley has the encasement plots. In the overall system we are basically looking for any new signs of die off or stress. If we do find additional stress or die off areas, we will go in and establish new plots. In the plots that have already been established we are looking for any changes that have happened during the past year. The parameters that we look at are the size of the trees, the number living versus dead, the 4886 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 percentage of leaf cover, the type of vegetation growing under them and any new propagules or growth that is coming up. Mr. Burke asked if you are confident that the water will not pond again with the channels that you have in place? Mr. Hall replied, "1 am confident that a lot more water is moving through there than there has been in the past". We don't know if we have to move more, because we have not been through the system with all of those in place. Mr. Burke asked if we would still be moving the water around if we decided to do nothing other than maintenance? Mr. Hall replied, "Yes, there would still be water moving around". Mr. Brown stated that you have a world of experience and as part of this study are you going to come up with A) if it is too salty you are going to recommend what? If it is B) and not salty enough, you are going to recommend what? In other words, is this just to collect data so that there is another contract to resolve something else, or is this a contract that says we want to look at this and if you have A) this is the solution and if you have B), this is the solution, etc., and at the end of the period the data can be applied to something that is meaningful and not just a stack of data that says you need another study? Mr. Hall replied, "No, si~'. I do not want to be out there collecting data for the sake of collecting data. Mr. Brown asked for the three or four options that you are looking at right now? Mr. Hall replied, "The biggest thing I am looking for is to determine the depth and duration of the water levels in the mangrove areas and trying to correlate that between the areas that look healthy versus the ones that look stressed. If there is a definite difference and the water is getting higher or staying noticeably longer, that can be a potential and that highlights areas where we need to put in additional channels to try to move a little more of that water through quicker, to match the conditions of the areas that are looking good. Mr. Brown asked if the study would say to dig more channels or not to dig more channels? 4887 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16,3 1 Mr. Hall replied, "That would be one of the results". Another result could potentially be that the ground elevations in some of the areas are different, but most of the work is going to involve digging of some sort. Right now the biggest concern is the water and whether or not more channels need to be put in. Mr. Brown stated that does not really say what the solution is. Mr. Hall stated that if the data that we have gathered shows that the water levels are there and are higher in the stressed areas for a noticeably longer period of time, that tells us that we need to move more water through those areas and the result is that the only way we have available to do that is with channels. Mr. Carroll stated that you said cattails were not productive or not as productive as other plantings that might be used. I have trouble applying the word "productive" to any kind of vegetation. What do you mean when you say "cattails are not productive"? Mr. Hall replied, "By productive, we mean the amount of vegetation or biomass that they produce in relationship to what they take up out of their environment, such as water nutrients". How they convert what they take up into plant material or biomass. Mr. Carroll asked if some of the re-plantings are more productive? Mr. Hall replied, "The re-plantings are better as a system". Looking at it as a system, having multiple species of plants is a more productive system because you have more animals that will utilize the area and you have more variability in what is going on in that system and if you would have some sort of a catastrophic event, which may come in and damage some of the materials, there are other species there that are able to make up the difference. You would not have a complete system failure because of one event. Mr. Sutphin stated that I believe it is well documented that digging channels seems to improve the situation, is that right? Mr. Hall replied, "That has been what we have seen so far". Mr. Sutphin asked if there is any documented evidence that digging channels hurts? Mr. Hall replied, "Not yet". 4888 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J Mr. Sutphin stated that I would submit as an option to spending more money on the study to find out if these areas will be susceptible to digging more channels, let's take the money and dig the channels. Spend the money doing something rather than studying more and more. It just goes on and on and nothing gets done. Mr. Vlasho explained that I am looking at three sheets of paper. One says the Sub- committee Consultant Study Proposals $165,000. In the Budget book I think it applies to how we are going to set policy here, but is $1,045,000 in Restoration Fund 320. Then someone put a sheet in my place that shows $1,080,000. Mr. Ward, am I correct in assuming that the $165,000 is in those numbers? Mr., Ward replied, "Yes". Mr. Vlasho asked if these numbers have on-going maintenance included and what else? Mr. Ward replied, "Yes, plus the additional work that Mr. Hall had referenced to you a moment ago". Mr. Vlasho stated that there is a contingent budget and asked if the study requires funds, are the funds in here? Mr. Ward replied, "Right". Mr. Vlasho stated that he made some notes and observations as the questioning was going on, with sort of an "ah shucks" attitude for this project from Mr. Turrell and that I sort of am involved but I don't know why. On one item you said that is not a big deal to us, then you said maybe, we hope, shooting in the dark and that with regard to Vanderbilt you are still touchy about that after all of these years. You said I don't care I am out of it, but you can't be out of it if you are overseeing this project, so you ought to get off of that. We have been waiting on the rainy season for a long time and hopefully it will get here. One place we said there are no dollars in the budget and perhaps you were referring to your budget specifically, but then we also said there was surveying going on for new channels. There is more going on right now than maintenance and we ought to review exactly what is going on. I am sure that in the Sub-committee they have reviewed that, but for the residents and all of us on the Board, we ought to know what is going on today. It is a dilemma and sometimes when we are bantering with you on comments, we are just 4889 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 reacting. We are neophytes. Mr. Wemer, Mr. Brown and Mr. Harrell have been involved in this project since inception. We understand the complexities, but on the other hand when we are talking about $1,000,000 and we have already spent $2,000,000, I guess it blows my mind that we have no background information. The question is what have we been doing for five years? We must have a ton of background information. Mr. Werner stated that Mr. Turrell got involved in this project after I talked to Mr. Ward and we talked him into doing it. The reason for this is that he is the most sensible environmentalist that I have met and I have met some crazy ones. When he does things, he does take into consideration the cost-to-benefit relationship. He is going to do a good job, but he is not going to get carried away by it and it is not the most important thing in his life. In the budget for next year, perhaps the most important thing we have done is to go ahead and budget $50,000 for ten hours of work a week that would include regular coordination for the consultants. Also budgeted are meetings with the consultants, so that they don't come to our Sub-committee meetings and have differences of opinions and that is what you will get without the meetings. Mr. Tun'ell replied, "1 don't mean to belittle myself with this project at all, but I have had to distance myself from the trauma that is in Pelican Bay over this die off'. I have had people start looking at me as if I caused it and those mangroves were dead long before Mr. Turrell came on the scene. It is hard when people want to come after us as if we did something wrong, we are trying to help. Mr. Vlasho stated that we are here partially because I was the one several months ago that said let's get our arms around this and get a coordinated effort. On the other hand, we have to react to what we hear because ultimately we are going to be approving a budget and we have to decide what is going to be in that budget for this mangrove project. Mr. Turrell stated that we worked hard to put together a proposal and what you have in front of you is what we think needs to be done, based on our years of experience and we are as serious as a heart attack about making it work. Ms. Kathy Worley - The Conservancy - One of your directives was asking about the fresh water into the mangroves and how Mr. Lewis said they could grow in fresh water. Yes, 4890 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 mangroves can grow in fresh water, but one of the problems when you have a fresh water system is that mangroves do not compete well with fresh water plants and they will get pushed out. When there is a lot of fresh water in the system, the mangroves are susceptible to mealy bug infestation, which can sometimes cause stress and/or death. Also you were talking about salinity in the Upper Clam Bay system and I measure that every month. I also do salinity tests at the berm every month, so those records are available. It is fresh water at the berm and salt water in Upper Clam Bay. Interestingly, with salinity you also find hyper saline conditions closer to the die offs. I want to caution you if you think digging channels is the cure all for everything. Digging channels is part of the cure, but I don't think it is the entire cure, because there are other things going on. Typically, when you dig a channel you will get re-growth on either side for a certain distance and then it stops and you cannot channel that entire area. It is physically and financially impossible to cut channels in that entire area, so you also have to look at other things that are going wrong in there. You have some fungal problems and some bug infestation problems. These are not related to the water, but are in the lower tidal areas where you are getting good tidal flow, so there are other problems out there. The Conservancy has four different studies going on out there right now. We have vegetative monitoring plots that are a lot like the ones Turrell and Associates have. We do bi-yearly monitoring on these plots and we have been doing it since 1999 and the monitoring is basically a vegetative profile of what is going on in the plots. We have put in an additional eight plots this year, primarily in the Strand area. We do hydrologic monitoring of surface and groundwater levels and how the water is moving through the Strand. We have been doing that for three months and will continue for another nine months, so that I get a total yearly cycle of what is going on in there as far as the way the surface and groundwater is moving through that Strand area. We have done a topographical study of the area so we do have centimeter level differences. The other study we are doing is a soil study, part of which has been funded by the Mangrove Action Group. Also from another funding source we are doing some basic soil chemistry analysis in the Strand. We want to make sure we don't overlap what is being done so that there is no repetitive data. Mr. Brown stated that it sounds as if you are doing what Turrell is proposing to do. 4891 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 Mr. Werner asked if Ms. Worley shares the data that is collected from these studies? Ms. Worley replied, "Anyone who wants it can get it". I have not analyzed a lot of it, because a lot of it is for my thesis. I want a whole years' worth of hydrologic data before I decide what is going on with it, but if someone wants my preliminary data it is available. Mr. Turrell stated that the things that Ms. Worley are doing are not being repeated. We know what she is doing and part of the problem is that there are different groups doing different things. Part of what we have in this budget is to coordinate these efforts and to make sure that we are the central clearinghouse for all of this data. Mr. Werner asked Ms. Worley if when you say you are going to go out and do a plot, do you tell anybody about it? Ms. Worley replied, "1 never place it where another plot is located, but no, because my studies are geared at answering a lot in the Strand area. I needed a certain number of live, in transition and dead trees, so I didn't broadcast where I was doing it. Mr. Werner asked if it would be helpful if that information were coordinated with Mr. Turrell or Mr. Hall? Ms, Worley replied, "It might be helpful to them, but I obviously cannot move them now". Mr. Turrell stated that we do pay attention and we know where those plots are. Another thing that I would like to see better coordinated is the water quality data acquisition that Mr. Lukasz has been doing in Pelican Bay. The Venetian Bay people have been doing it also, but it is not synchronized. Ms. Worley does water quality testing for both Vanderbilt Lagoon and Venetian Bay and this should all be synchronized or otherwise you cannot compare the data. Ms. Worley agreed that it should be synchronized. Mr. Turrell stated that there are things that the Conservancy are doing that we could work with them on, but it takes more time and that is why you have a bigger budget in front of you. Mr. Domenie stated that you are doing work that we don't know about, but this information should go to the coordinator. I was pleased to hear that you were taking water samples because I have been asking for it, but have never seen the results and did not know where I could go for the results. 4892 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 Ms. Worley explained that I do physical parameters, which are different than a total water quality sweep. Mrs. Sally Frazier - I want to make an editorial comment. It sounds a little here like we have the CIA, the FBI and the INS and you need someone to bring it all together. Mr. Marvin Peterson - President if the Mangrove Action Group - Since the MSTBU took the Clam Bay project over, we are basically in a monitoring situation. The Mangrove Action Group started in 1995, when Mrs. Potter and some of her neighbors started to see the mangrove die off. In January 1996 we incorporated as a Non-profit organization and subsequent to that we have a tax-exempt determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service. If anyone wants to make a contribution to our group, it is totally tax deductible. We started out by getting members and as dues we collected approximately $30,000-$40,000, but we never solicited beyond that because we have not spent all of the money. We have spent some with Ms. Worley and on some projects like that. The idea was to have this money available if we wanted to do some independent study, which obviously with the magnitude of this project, would not be very feasible. The money is there and we do want to be in this monitoring position. At this point, I think our group would say that hopefully you will continue to do something, because I don't think the cycle has been completed. By the same token my feeling would be that you can't have hope against hope and maybe nature is saying it is time for these to die and they are going to die no matter what you do. We have heard that the mangroves grow in a certain aroa and when summer comes, they die. If they keep growing and dying, I guess they aro not going to grow. Maybe it is a little premature and but thero has been a lot of money spent, but maybe not as efficiently as it could have been. I thought and felt that the Ted Brown Group was a panacea to the whole thing and Mr. Turrell just mentioned that all they did was tell us what was wrong and probably did not provide too much about what to do to correct it. I am sure it is a very complicated problem, but I am not a scientist and have no idea what they should be doing. I agree with the statements that you cannot keep spending and hoping. We appreciate the tremendous amount of work the Sub- committee has done. 4893 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 Mr. Tom Coppens - Dorchester - I lived at the Dorchester during Hurricane Andrew, which was a frightening experience as most of you know. One of the things I noticed at the time was that when the wind was from the west, we had projectiles blowing between the buildings and a lot of it was old as well as new branches from the mangroves. Those projectiles are dangerous and they hit our screens and broke things. Later on I got to thinking about it because in these last five to six years the mangroves where I live have grown dramatically and they are very green, so I guess they must be healthy. We are always worrying about the next hurricane, hopefully it won't come, but someday it will. Are we going to be in danger of having more projectiles coming at us because these mangroves are getting too high? Mr. Hall replied, "In any hurricane the nature of the beast is that you are going to have flying projectiles". In a healthy mangrove system they help to support each other. The trees are going to act as friction against those wind shear forces and to some extent should slow it down minimally in that immediate area. If it were me, I would want the trees there and it needs to be a system in an area big enough to support itself because single trees are more susceptible. Ms. Worley explained that the most dangerous thing in a hurricane is not so much the projectile as it is the storm surge and you will want anything you can get between you and the beach. Those mangroves are going to help you. If we would get a direct hit from a Category 5 storm, I don't know of anything that would save Pelican Bay or anything on this side of 1-75. Anything that you can put between you and the ocean will stop some of that storm surge. Mr. Coppens stated that I was asking if the mangroves in that area are getting too high and are we in danger of having the tops blown off and becoming projectiles? Mr. Hall stated that I don't think the height of the mangroves is going to make a difference. There are definitely going to be projectiles flying around, which is just going to happen if we have a hurricane. Mr. Turrell stated that those mangroves are no higher than they have been for the last 1,000 years. Maybe they are growing in a general area, but you should be happy that you have mature mangrove trees like historically used to be there. 4894 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J Mr. Vito Suziedelis - St. Laurent - We have some concerns in our condominium, as well as others in condominiums along the strip. We want to compliment the people who have done the good work in restoring the mangroves to the extent that was possible, but I think we need to separate the business of mangrove restoration from the cattail removal. The cattail removal has been a disaster as far as we are concerned. It has been going on for a year, has not shown any progress and I think the cattails are winning by a mile. The permit for the management of the system specifically prohibits the removal of cattails in Section 4.55. I don't know of any amendment or revision to this document to allow cattail removal. We heard the comments that saltwater is going to migrate to the berm and destroy these cattails, but realistically, this water is not salty and even the tides in August and September destroying the cattails is not the case. If you look at the tide tables between May, August and September, there is no great difference and is just a matter of inches. Unless you have a storm or something of that nature, water at the berm is not going to be salty enough to kill those cattails. This continuous poisoning should be stopped immediately and if you are talking about spending money, this is one area where we should save money and let that area recover. Mr. Hall stated that removal of the cattails is not prohibited in the Management Plan, but it is not proposed in the Management Plan. We have coordinated with the State FDEP in Tallahassee, for that removal program. The State is aware that it has been done and that there is a restoration and planting plan in effect to help that area regenerate once the cattails are removed. Mr. Suziedelis asked if that was in writing from Tallahassee and is it available? Mr. Hall replied, "Yes, it is in writing and it is available in our office". Mr. Turrell stated that Mr. Suziedelis had said to leave it alone and restore itself to its' natural state. Cattails were not the natural state out there. They might have been the natural state in the last twenty years, but they weren't prior to Pelican Bay. They were not what were there and they are not natural. We are trying to make it natural. Once again, we were directed to try to help with the cattail issue, it was not our idea. We were asked if we thought it was a good idea and yes, we thought it was a good idea. We were asked would we help? Sure, we will try to 4895 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 help. Is there a magic wand that you can wave over that area to make all of the cattails go away and daisies will appear overnight? No, it is a difficult thing and we are trying to work through it. I know it looks crummy. We are working with Mr. Lukasz and Pelican Bay Services and you will just have to try to be patient. Short of that it can go back to cattails, but that is not a good thing to do from a conservation standpoint. Mr. Suziedeiis stated that the comment has been made that cattails are less productive than some other plants. Are we trying to make the area more productive or are we concentrating on the mangrove restoration? Whether it existed twenty or thirty years ago I don't know, but the fact is that the area is much worse off now than it was a year ago. That is the concern of the residents. Mr. Vlasho stated that we are all frustrated as to what is going on and we realize that you and your neighbors see it on a daily basis, but that doesn't mean that some of us who don't live there don't share your concerns. However, we are where we are, this rainy season is about upon us and we are not very far from seeing what is going to happen. Once we get into September we can decide to go left or right. We are almost there, be patient a little longer and hopefully we will have some direction after this rainy season. Mrs. Alice Kay Potter - I have been so thrilled with this discussion, it has been so intelligent and gentlemanly and lady-like. I want to remind you of a sign that we see every day as we walk the boardwalk, "These mangroves are our natural heritage to enjoy, please help us save the mangroves". Mr. Vlasho asked for the direction of the Board. Mr. Werner asked if this should be done as part of the budget process? Mr. Vlasho stated that we could do that however, our agenda item is "Clam Bay program - Policy Direction". I think we need to establish the direction and then implement that direction in the budget discussion. Mr. Roellig suggested that each Board Member give a two- minute indication of their feeling. 4896 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 Mr. Brown stated that my feeling after talking to Mr. Turrell is that we will spend a lot of money on studies that are being partially done now. I think Mr., Sutphin had a great idea, if we are going to spend money let's dig a few more channels. The trees are coming back. The trees didn't die overnight, trees don't do that and they don't come back over night. It is probably no different than the burn that is taking place in Colorado right now. Those people are going to have an unsightly place for a while, but eventually their trees will come back. These mangroves will come back much faster than their plant materials that are burned. I would suggest that we not spend a great deal of money on additional studies because they will not tell us at the end of the study, exactly what we will have to do. Mr. Vlasho asked that from a policy point of view how would you summarize that? Mr. Brown replied, "1 would delay the study for another year". Mr. Burke stated that I am a believer that we should go back to the mission statement that the Foundation came up with about Pelican Bay being pre-eminent, etc. I am of the opinion that that mangrove and beach area are probably what separates Pelican Bay from most other communities. I certainly don't think it is our buildings because there are better looking buildings down on Gulfshore Boulevard. I don't think it is our landscaping because there are communities as nice and better than ours. I think it is the mangroves. If you watch the real estate people that are selling the high priced real estate, the first thing they do with their potential buyers is put them on a tram and take them down the boardwalk and I think it impresses people. I guess what I am saying is, I am not wild about spending more money for all of this without getting some kind of a fix on what the end results are going to be, but my tendency would be to think we may be a year or two away from getting this thing solved. If we dried the funds up now and stopped it, it may be a year too soon, I don't know. I think I would support the findings of our Sub-committee because I like the way things were talked about having a Project Manager to get our arms around this project. I would support what was recommended by the Sub-committee. Mr. David Roellig stated that I am looking at approximately $165,000 in studies that we are talking about. I think it is very important that we go forward with the coordination and the hiring of Tun'ell & Associates as the Project Manager. If we wanted to hold off a year on the 4897 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J hydrographic studies that would not break my heart. I think it is good information that we should go forward with and I would still propose to do all of the studies, but the only one that could wait a year would be the tidal circulation study if we decided to do that. I reiterate the point that others have made, there has been a vast improvement over the past year. It is critical to see how we get through this rainy season. One of the things that people have kind of glossed over is the channel dredging and the pass opening that was done under the original construction and not talked about much because it was extremely successful. That is not a point of contention or debate any longer and has been very successful and has caused a great increase in the drainage of the mangroves. My basic point is that I would like to move ahead with a complete study, although I would not fall on my sword if we didn't do the hydrographic part of the project. Mr. Carroll stated that I am more in the position of supporting what Mr. Sutphin and Mr. Brown have talked about, which is maintenance, monitoring and perhaps some coordination. I would like to see us hold off on the studies and capital spending for a year or two. Mr. Sutphin stated that we might have heard the best definition so far of why we are doing the spending in the mangroves and is one that I totally agree with. The beach and mangrove preserve is one of the premiere attractions that differentiate this community from most others in Florida, if not the country. If that is the reason we are spending money, then I am all for it, not because of some State edict that the mangroves take preference over Live Oaks or some other species. That is what makes Pelican Bay special. Conversely, I have this fear of blindly throwing money at a problem under the premise that more money will fix it fast and better and in my experience, it tends to be the reverse. Intelligent budgeting and once the budget has been made, judiciously controlling how those funds are spent, not assuming because it is budgeted the check is already signed. There is a big difference. If we want to put some consulting studies in the budget I am all for it, providing we have some control at the Sub-committee level and then at the Board level about releasing those funds on a project-by-project basis, as the Board sees fit to release those funds to be spent. When there is a question of fund limitation and there are only so many dollars available, I firmly come down on the side of action as opposed to study; don't create more data. 4898 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J Mr. Domenie stated that I feel I put my comments in my Memorandum. I have classified approximately $230,000 of maintenance expenses, which I think we should do. Out of the $1,045,000, $105,000 is for dune restoration, so there is no question about that. I have a question about the die off area planting and no one so far has been specific about that and whether we should go ahead with the $105,000 or not. Perhaps we could get along fine with $50,000 and see what those results are this year. I agree with the interior channel mapping, as well as the interior tidal channels to be dug. I feel that is important. Regarding the hydrographic study and improvements of $364,000, I have recommended that we go ahead with the engineering but do not spend the $302,000 on Other Contractual Services. As far as the cattail planting of $160,000, nobody has mentioned specific figures and again I am questioning if we go with the smaller plants, can we do that for a lesser price, but are we going to have to continue spraying the cattails? Mr. Harrell stated that I remember the first time I got on one of these trams and I felt pretty silly. I went through a mangrove forest and I felt a little better. When I came out at the beach, I felt I had landed in paradise. I think we can't forget that and what it is like to go through that forest and see the beach for the first time. You can get jaded and never go out there or we can go play tennis instead of visiting the restaurants. The bottom line is that we are a beach and mangrove community and it makes us different from Grey Oaks and every place else. I think we need to be aggressive and move forward and spend the money. I think more money will fix it faster and better. I am not for wasting money; I just don't know what part to not waste. I think we ought to fix the cattails. There is nobody up here who thought the cattail area was going to look like it does. I remember asking the question of what it would like and someone saying a lake. We can all live with a lake; fix the cattails. We are the top of the hill and if you want to act like Lely you can act like Lely, but this is Pelican Bay. Mr. Werner stated that I feel that we ought to go with the hydrological study as we have budgeted and the improvements yet to be identified should be budgeted for. In our meeting at the Commons, Mr. Turrell agreed that he would put together a critical path that shows that this makes sense. Let's budget for it and if we don't like the plan, then say too bad we don't like it, it 4899 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 doesn't make sense. I would say let's go ahead with the budget process and keep it in there, but make sure that we understand the pros and cons when Mr. Turrell presents his plan. Mr. Vlasho stated that I think our direction should be that we would allow the $436,000, which covers dune restoration, cattail area planting, monitoring of Clam Pass and monitoring of the activity in the Clam Bay system. Also, adopt the Consultant Proposal for $165,000 and say let's wait until the results come in to do future budgeting. I think we have gone this far and all we are asking our left pocket, Pelican Bay, to pay for is $165,000. Our right pocket and the rest of the $400,000 are County funds and that has to happen anyway, doesn't it Mr. Ward? Mr. Ward replied, "The maintenance does and there are additional funds for the cattails and dune restoration" Mr. Vlasho stated that we have heard the cattails have to happen and we all agree on the dune restoration. Mr. Werner asked Restoration Program, with if you are saying what has been budgeted for the Clam Bay the exception of the hydrographic improvements that were to be identified, should be included? Mr. Vlasho replied, "1 would probably include approximately $30,000 for channels". From a direction point of view, we could agree to something like that and then in our budget discussion Mr. Ward could go through the specific items. Mr. Werner asked Mr. Ward that if we go ahead with the hydrographic study from Humiston & Moore, they would not be getting into any improvements until the next fiscal year would they? Mr. Vlasho stated that they could not start until this budget is approved. Mr. Werner asked what if it was approved? Mr. Ward replied, "Simply put, the answer is yes if you wanted to". The reason we could is that there is approximately $300,000 in what was to be capital work to be done in the current fiscal year that is not going to be undertaken this year. You could literally start the $165,000 work currently and probably finish it by the end of this calendar year. 49OO PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J Mr. Domenie stated that I was under the impression that in order to do this hydrographic study they would need a full twelve- month cycle to come up with a good figure and that was why the $302,000 figure could be postponed for a year. Mr. Hall replied, "The model could be set up and calibrated in a shorter period of time, but to test the calibration you would want to run it through the full year so that you could see what elevations would turn out, based on what was actually recorded in the field. It is a way of verification. This study basically shows what will happen within the Clam Bay system if Vanderbilt Lagoon is opened. Mr. Sutphin stated I feel that the Vanderbilt Lagoon reconnect has so many political implications and affects so many other jurisdictions, that the chances of it happening quickly are between slim and none, so why are we spending money? Mr. Hall replied, "That is not the only application that this study would work for". There is the potential for what might happen if and when the culverts are removed at Seagate. There is also the work that has been proposed to move some of your storm water from System IV into System II1. There is also another application of what are the expected water levels or the kind of surges that you could expect in the mangroves under different storm circumstances? Mr. Sutphin stated that I would simply rank that as a discretionary expense for money left over that I didn't know what else to do with it. Mr. Turrell stated that is not our firm that is Humiston & Moore; I am not defending anything I am doing here. Remember why we thought about doing that in the first place is because we think the overabundance of fresh water in Upper Clam Bay killed the mangroves. That is a way to get rid of the fresh water. If we want to ignore that solution, that is fine, but make sure you know what you are doing. Mr. Werner stated that we have to understand that by including it in a budget, we are not authorizing the study. They have to come up with some kind of sensible plan for our consideration, but I think we should have the money in the budget in case we decide the plan makes sense and we want to do the study. I don't have a problem deferring the improvements of 4901 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J $302,000 for a year or so, but I think we should at least have the money budgeted for the study and not necessarily authorize it. Mr. Domenie stated that I was under the impression that the $62,000 was only for the study for re-directing water from System IV to System III and I did not realize that it went down to the Seagate flap gates or up to Vanderbilt Beach Road. Is that sufficient money to do a complete study such as that? Mr. Hall replied, "The $70,000 is what Humiston & Moore have said that they need in the budget to do the study". Mr. Vlasho asked Mr. Ward, now that you have said there are some funds available, from a policy point of view should we decide that we want to do the study? I think if that was an affirmative vote, which I would hope that it would be, that we start that immediately and take some of the funds in this current year and get moving. I think the coordination is so important and the sooner we can get started on the information, it takes twelve months to get a full study, then perhaps next year when some of you are sitting here at budget time, you will have that data so that you can make an intelligent decision on what to do in the following year. Part B would be that the $436,000 would stay in for those three categories and Part C is some minimal amount of funds to allow you to dig out there. Does that make sense to the Board? Mr. Werner stated that I have a problem authorizing moving forward on a study without understanding it. I would like to see it written down as to what the study is going to accomplish. I don't mind budgeting for it. Mr. Ward stated that what I was trying to indicate to you was that if you want to move forward with it you can if that is your desire. It obviously has to come back to you as a Sub- committee and then through that process. Mr. Vlasho stated that I would suggest that it goes back to Sub-committee and if the Sub- committee is comfortable they would then bring it back for final approval. As a policy direction, we say this is what we are going to do. Mr. Ward stated that if you remove the $302,000 you probably reduce the assessment level for Clam Bay to essentially "0" for fiscal year 2003. 49O2 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J 1 Mr. Werner stated that for the other items such as die off plantings, I assume we are going to see how those plantings have survived and if they have not, we are not going to spend money on new plantings. Mr. Vlasho stated that my intention is that we don't do anything else until the study is finished, except a minimal amount of channel digging and maintenance and provide some flexibility for the Sub-committee to do some of the things that will need to be done. Mr. Wemer asked if you would be eliminating the $302,000 hydrographic improvements and the $100,000 for die off plantings? Mr. Roellig stated that everybody has had their say on policy and there has been somewhat of a range of opinion. I think the Sub-committee and consultants have a good idea of where we are headed on this. When we go through the budget and do line items we can then take votes. I would not be opposed to moving ahead with the opinions we now have. Mr. Vlasho stated that normally I would say that perhaps this time yes, but I don't want anyone from the Board going away saying that is not what I wanted to do. I would rather have something a little more formal. Mr. Werner asked Mr. Vlasho to explain one more time about the die off plantings, you do not want to budget it in next year's budget? Mr. Ward suggested that if you take out the $302,000 it essentially reduces the Clam Bay levy to "0" for the current year. If you take out any more than that, it will just flow down to cash reserves that we have available for the future years. Because of the amount that we are asking the County to fund, I would rather budget the money specifically, rather than let it fall down into reserves. Mr. Vlasho stated that without going through the details of the budget, that put in approximately $125,000 more than I was thinking when I was going through this. 4903 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD June 12, 2002 16J Mr. Werner moved, seconded by Mr. Domenie and approved I~ on a vote of 8/1 that we proceed with the proposed budget I for Clam Bay, removing the hydrographic improvements in I the amount of $302,000. Mr. Brown cast the dissenting vote. PRESENTATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2003 BUDGET Mr. Werner stated that he would like to make a suggestion. I believe the operating budget is going to be what it is and we have all had a chance to review that. I believe we ought to focus on the Capital Budget. Mr. Ward replied that is up to you, but I can tell you that from an operating perspective, the Operating Budget has not changed dramatically from what you have seen during the last year. The increases are generally fixed cost increases. For example, the effluent use rate within the Community Beautification portion is what is driving the numbers up for the current year. The staffing levels and levels of service are all consistent and there has been no significant changes with respect to your Water Management, your Community Beautification, Streetlights and Security Budget. The major change or the major discussion that we have in this budget is your Landscaping and Community Improvement Program for fiscal year 2002-2003 and I can focus on that, if that is what you would prefer that I do. Mr. Vlasho stated that if anyone has any particular questions on the Operating Budget we could get those taken care of and then go to the Capital Budget rather than have Mr. Ward make a full presentation. Commissioner Carter stated that he has to leave and wanted to congratulate you on your discussion of the mangroves because that is a Natural Resource Protection Area as far as Collier County is concerned. If you remember back to my first year in office, I had gotten the maintenance shifted from your budget to the County's. What you did today will give me enough ammunition to be able to argue what you are doing, as we would look at this from the County's perspective, as a partnership. I don't know whether or not another Commissioner would even question that. There is only one Commissioner that I know of that is going to take that budget apart with a fine-toothed comb and you never know what will happen. I don't think the other three 4904 Ftela Carter Henning Coyle Coletta 1 To: From: Sue Filson Executive Assistant, BCC Ron Hovell, P.E. Public Utilities Engineering Department, Coastal Projects Manager Date: September 13, 2002 Subject: Coastal Advisory Committee Minutes The subject meeting minutes and public notices are forwarded for submission to the Board of County Commissioners for the following three meetings: 15-Mar-02, 5-Apr-02, 9-May-02 The subject workshop minutes will be forwarded upon approval of the committee at their next meeting: 1-Feb-02, 22-Feb-02, 1-Mar-02 If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at 530-5342. RH Attachments ; Date: ~ : Copies To: Public Utilities Engine~ngDepartmenr ap~es Daily News ap±es, FL 34102 Af~id~vit_o~ Publication Nap±es ~amly News PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEERING 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E BLDG H NAPLES FL 34112 REFERENCE: 059405 #204107 58449589 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEE State of Florida CoDn~y of_~ollm~r De±ore mne unaers_~nea aumaormm¥, Derso~ai±v app~ar~d_B._L~mb, wh~ o~ oat~ sayg~t~t ~he_s~rves ~s ~ssmsmanm ~qrpQrase ~ecresary~Q~ ~ ~ ap±es~ ~aiA~ N~ws,_a da~±~_new$ a~e_.pu~±~nea.~t ~aD±es, · n u~l~me~ uocnty~Yorm~a~,.cDa~ cne a¢~acneo copy om aaverqi~mng~wa~ Duommsnem mn samm new~aDer Qn . AtI$~nt lurther says~$hay ~he~ s~id~Napl~s Dai~y ~ew$ ~s ~ newspaper pUOzlsn~.~5, m~p±es, .%n sam~ ~o±±ier ~o~nEy~ ~±or%aa, ~nG mnam ~ne sa~m ne~$pape~ nas hereto~Qre O~en ~ont~uou~±y · Duo±msQe~ in~samd Co±±m~r ~ounsy~±Qrmma, e~cn may anm nas. peen ~a$$¢r a~ th~ po~D O~lce~mn map±e$,~mn~s~mG ~o±Amer ~oqnm¥, r±o~%aa~ zoy~a p~rmom Qz ~ year nexn pr~ce~in~ 9tt~gnem copy.~z, amyerymseme~j anm zurmoer~says nnam sne~oas nezmner paA~ nor Duommse~ any. person, ±%tm.or corpo~an%o~ any~ amscount, _r~b~te, com~%ss~Qn or rezun~ ~or Ene puypos~ puo±~cmion mn mne samG newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 05/07 AD SPACE: 65 009 INCH FILED ON: 05/07,02 Signature of Affiant ~ ~ -/~/ 16J MII~ 1 THIRD iWILL OF ICH PUR- : NCE THE AP, Sworn to and Subscribed k~ore m day of Personally known by me ~_~? ~ k_Az. Lf~lm/Z~ ~o-~ ~ ~nna Ch~n~ My Commis~on DD058336 2o0 May 9, 2002 COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE County Commissioners Boardroom Building F, 3ra Floor 3301 Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34104 16J MINUTES May 9, 2002 Chairman Gary Galleberg called meeting to order at 1:30 P.M. ATTENDANCE Members: Gary Galleberg, Anthony Pires, William Kroeschell, John Strapponi, Ron Pennington, Robert Stakich Collier County: Ron Hovell, P.E. City of Naples: Dr. Jon C. Staiger Others: Shannon Cromwell - Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Ruth McCann - Marco Island Civic Association, Regina Reilly - Marco Island Beach Advisory Committee, Ken Humiston - Humiston & Moore Engineering, Julie Locascio - Friends of Tigertail Mr. Galleberg introduces new member, Ron Pennington. II. ADDITIONS TO AGENDA Mr. Galleberg asked if there were to be any additions to the agenda and Ron Hovell confirmed that there were two additions; a DEP response letter and activities summary. There was a movement to start covering new business, but Mr. Hovell wanted to first address the additions to the agenda. The DEP sent a response letter on May 6 regarding the sand web system that was being used in parts of Collier County. The DEP stated in its' letter that they consider the sand web system an experimental technology and if the county wanted to pursue it, they could not simply modify the existing permit, but would be required to submit a new joint coastal permit application. Their indication is that unless the county had a different use of the sand web system, they would not give permits for this until the system goes through full tests and they make a decision whether it will be useful for the future. Mr. Galleberg wondered how this arose since he felt that this committee, the Naples City Council, and the Board of County Commissioners agreed to not modify the permit. Mr. Hovell responded by informing the committee that actually Parker Beach Restoration, Inc. had petitioned the board at a meeting in March to modify permits in order to later decide whether to truck in sand verse using the sand web system. William Kroeschell wanted to know when the permits expire and Mr. Galleberg believed that it was 18 months of monitoring after April 30th, when the nets have been removed. Mr. Hovell confirmed. Mr. Hovell then spoke about the project where sand was trucked onto Naples and Vanderbilt beaches. He stated that they were able to truck 45 cubic yards of sand and deposit between Doctor's Pass and Naples Avenue, which brought that area aback to the design height, but not the width, of the renourishment project of 1995-1996. He felt this project went well and they did a good job accommodating all the hotels and beach vendor's requests. Dr. Jon Staiger later stated his agreement with this, as well. III. IV. May 9, 2002 16J Mr. Galleberg wanted to tie that in to the discussion about the sand web system. He wanted to know how long it took to truck in and deposit the 50,000 cubic yards of sand. Mr. Hovell answered that it took about 6 weeks. Dr. Jon Staiger then provided the committee with the statistics concerning the sand web system. He stated that during the 5 months that the web was in place, about 20,000 to 25,000 cubic yards were deposited. The prediction for the project was 60,000 cubic yards. Mr. Galleberg noted that we will never know how much of that would have come back just by nature. Dr. Staiger pointed out that a benefit of the system was that during February and March, the beach with the netting did not gain or lose any sand, however, the control groups experienced erosion during this time. Ron Pennington stated that he observed the area where the Parker web had been, and he did not observe any difference between that area and the areas south. He also was concerned because south of Doctor's Pass, there is a lot of sand that is deposited on the higher beach, which he felt would not be possible with the nets. John Strapponi asked what was the cost per yard with the Parker system. Dr. Staiger answered that they were paying $8.50 per cubic yard for the sand, but when you factor in the engineering and monitoring costs, the price rose to about $20 to $25 per cubic yard. He said that after research was completed, he hoped there would no longer be a need for monitoring, although that is up to the state and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services. Mr. Strapponi asked if the cost would be less than $10 per yard without the monitoring and Dr. Staiger believed it would. Anthony Pires questioned about the lack of court reporter and Mr. Galleberg and Mr. Hovell caught him up on this matter. OLD BUSINESS a. Approval of Minutes for March 15, 2002 and April 5, 2002 Anthony Pires moved to accept the minutes and William Kroeschell seconds. It passes unanimously. b. Future Meeting Schedule Ron Hovell states that the future meeting schedule is to be the second Thursday of each month in the boardroom at 1:30 P.M. NEW BUSINESS a. Beach Cleaning Chairmen Galleberg introduced the topic of beach cleaning by stating that he wanted to get into this subject more deeply during this meeting. Ron Hovell mentioned article from Marco Island Eagle regarding beach raking. The article recommended that the county not rake as frequently, especially with the equipment currently being used. He then introduced Shannon Cromwell from the Conservancy of Southwest Florida to speak on this topic. Shannon Crom~vell - She is here representing the Conservancy to inform the committee that they are concerned with the amount of beach raking that is currently taking place on Collier County beaches. They would like regulations to be established to protect the beach ecosystem and feel the raking should only be done on an as needed basis; for example, red fide, excess litter or debris, etc. Ms. Cromwell stated that the Conservancy also recommends that the county set forth guidelines of "necessity". She handed out an example of necessity guidelines from the Sarasota County beach clean-up policy. Ms. Cromwell then suggested that if daily beach cleaning was still desired, that this be done by hand to remove the litter, rather than using machines. She brought in a bucket of a dumpster samplings she collected from the four beach sites; Naples beach, Park shore, 1 May 9, 2002 16J Vanderbilt beach and resident's beach form Marco Island. The results were that of 37 pounds of shell and debris, they were only about five small items of litter found. Ms. Cromwell also provided some pictures she took which showed a large amount of shells and sand in the dumpsters. Ms. Cromwell noted that she has spoken with Marco Island Beach Advisory Committee and they voted in favor of limiting the number of beach rakings that they perform. She spoke the EAC who were very receptive with the Conservancy's recommendations. She also spoke with two members from the county's Natural Resources and they said they would like to work with her on this matter. Finally, Ms. Cromwell stated that the Conservancy believes that excessive beach raking is not aesthetically or economically beneficial and is detrimental to the protection of the beach eco- system. They recommended that the committee accept the changes stated in the letter by the Conservancy. Mr. Pires noted that it would be much easier to implement regulations with some other code changes or policies, rather than to change the land development codes. He then asked if the Conservancy is asking for the changes to be made below or above the rack line. Mr. Hovell answered that a permit from the state is always needed, so he believed state would cover this in the permit process. Mr. Hovell brought up the issue of the rock removal plan. If they are going to execute this plan by other means (not using raking machines), then they would have to get permission from the state to do otherwise. Shannon Cromwell mentioned that she spoke with someone form the Florida DEP and they discussed how Collier County has chosen beach raking to be their form of rock removal maintenance. They informally believed that this method could be changed and there could be another way to perform this maintenance. Anthony Pires asked Ms. Cromwell whether she feels that handpicking should be the method to collect litter so as not to disturb the beach, and she responds affirmatively. William Kroeschell stated that he sees no need to be raking beaches based on the fact that Sanibel has shells and people love that beach. John Strapponi elected to play devil's advocate, and he raised the question of what do tourists want; are they here for shelling or for walking barefoot on the beach? He then asked if Ms. Cromwell's samples were one-time or random samples, and she clarified that they were one- time samples. He asked how can we remove rocks, which is set forth by the mandate, without removing shells, and also, why is it so terrible to remove the shells? Ms. Cromwell responded that many of the shells that are raked and discarded contain living animals or are whole shells, which are desired by shellers of the beaches. She stated there is a reason for the shells to be at the beach, i.e. inhibit erosion, breakdown into sand, etc. Ron Pennington asked whether the raking is an ordinance or administrative. Mr. Hovell believed it has j~st evolved and is not a written policy, certainly not an ordinance. Mr. Pennington commented that he has seen the beach being raked even when there is nothing on the beach to be groomed. He stated that he appreciates and concurs with the Conservancy's recommendations. Mr. Galleberg said that he would not advocate upsetting the rock removal plan, but he does feel they have lost sight of the real goal and wants to focus on the issue of cleaning the beach when there is no cleaning to be done. Mr. Strapponi asked if the beach inspector suggests where and when raking is to occur, but Mr. Hovell clarified that the three raking machines will rake everyday whether or not there is a need. bo 1 6J Gary Galleberg stated that this type of raking, overtime, will harm wildlife and the stability of the beach, which will in the future lead to more renourishing to be done. The committee then discussed the use of dragging a chain-link fence for grooming the beach. Mr. Galleberg advised that there needed to be a distinction made between grooming and raking. Mr. Hovell introduced Ruth McCann, the Executive Director of the Marco Island Civic Association. Ruth McCann - She informed that the raking began in Marco when the condo owner's paid for the beach to be renourished and as part of the permit, they were required to maintain beach after the renourishment. So, the raking was not intended for rock removal. She had a problem with changing the beach maintenance schedule due to an unscientific study. Ms. McCann suggested that if they are considering changing the plan, they should first conduct a scientific study. In regard to excessive raking, she suggested that it might be helpful to adjust the depth of the raking. Dr. Staiger commented that he feels we need to leave the rack line alone and he also agreed with Mr. Pennington that there is too much raking, especially where there isn't a need for rock removal. He concurred with the Conservancy's point that the raking should be on an as needed basis and felt a compromise needed to be made. Regina Riley - She is from the Marco Island Beach Advisory Committee and was concerned about the amount of sand compaction caused by machines, which leads to the need for tilling. She suggested that a compromise be made and to not rake everyday. Ron Pennington made a motion to request that the staff propose regulations for beach grooming, preservation, or maintenance consistent with the recommendations from the Conservancy and to provide the ability of the local entities to deviate depending on their situation to be considered at the June meeting. Second was given by Mr. Pires. Passes unanimously. Mr. Hovell clarified that tilling is a requirement of the beach renourishment permits, which is very easy to fail. Therefore, they will generally till without even checking. He doesn't think that the beach raking has anything to do with compaction. Caxambas Pass (10500) Ron Hovell informed that back in January, Taylor Engineering was hired to review all the data and monitoring reports for Caxambas pass, the breakwaters and all Marco Island beaches and asked them to make recommendations for possible future projects. Taylor Engineering has a question for the county: What do you want for a beach at the south end of Marco Island? He described the present beach. Mr. Hovell wanted to develop a process of finding this answer at this meeting. Mr. Hovell introduced Ken Humiston of Humiston & Moore Engineers. Ken Humiston - He brought their recent monitoring report for the committee to discuss. He pointed out an inconsistency in the report dealing with the DEP monument R148. This monument was destroyed by erosion and reset by two separate surveyors, during which, some data corrections were overlooked. He stated that the data showed that there was a gradual increase in beach width after with the construction of the segmented breakwater at monument R148. Mr. Humiston is in agreement that it depends what the county and the citizens would like to have done. They concluded that the current breakwater would not produce a beach of sufficient width. His recommendation was to modify the breakwater, where Taylor Engineering had recommended beach renourishment via trucking. 4 1 Mr. Pennington asked how much increase in the breakwater is needed to make a significant increase in the beach width? Mr. Humiston said that conceptually (there is no design at this time), it would need another section added to the current three sections, plus they may need to add some additional rocks in between the segments to reduce wave interaction. Mr. Pennington then asked what was the estimated yield of beach width, and Mr. Humiston replied that, conceptually, they could achieve a 100-foot beach width, which is more than double the existing beach. Gary Galleberg summarized by asking if Mr. Humiston felt it was feasible to accomplish this, depending on the amount of money and community support, and Mr. Humiston replied "yes" and described how the current breakwater had helped the present beach. Mr. Pennington asked what was behind the seawall that needed to be protected. Mr. Humiston answered that it was Marco Point, a collection of high-rise condos. Mr. Pennington questioned how far were they from the seawall and Mr. Humiston believed about 30 to 4 0 feet. Mr. Pennington stated his initial reaction would be that it would be prudent to this, purely as a protection standpoint. Ron Hovell expressed concern whether the extra beach would even be much protection from a storm surge, and whether it would be worth the half-million dollars to do the project. Mr. Hovell informed the committee that they only have a permit for beach renourishment and they have about one million dollars for this budget. Mr. Galleberg stated that more information is needed in order to make this decision. Anthony Pires agreed. Mr. Pennington made a motion directing staff to bring additional information about this project and alternative uses for the money and Mr. Pires seconds. Passes unanimously. Mr. Galleberg asked for public comments. Julie Locascio - Friends of Tigertail Ms. Locascio stated it is her belief that the buildings should have never been built so close to the seawall and she is concerned that taxpayers will be paying for a beach that is essentially a private beach. William Kroeschell thought that this beach had public access and Ms. Locascio assured that it has since been fenced off. Mr. Galleberg urged Friends of Tigertail to write a letter expressing their concern. Mr. Pires asked if the staff could summarize the reports and point out the benefits of this project to the public. Co Hideaway Beach Renourishment (10502) and Hideaway Beach Access Improvements (10511) Mr. Hovell stated that they have approximately $700,000 to spend on Hideaway Beach. He felt that this could lead to a discussion about project cost sharing. He questioned how valuable is it to attract tourism to Collier County, taking into account the Tourist Tax Fund. Mr. Hovell informed that they received a proposal for design and permitting of Hideaway Beach Renourishment for over $400,000, yet they only have $330,000 in the budget. Therefore, he felt that they would probably need to come up with a phased approach. He questioned the best way to proceed considering this. Mr. Pennington asked if they were committed to the project. Mr. Hovell replied "no", other than the fact that people were aware that it is already factored into the budget. Mr. Hovell questioned whether it is worth spending the money now for design and permitting if they 5 Vo VI. VII. weren't committed to spend the multi-million dollars needed for the project down the road. Mr. Pires also expressed concern over whether it would be an appropriate project. After a short discussion, Mr. Pires felt it would be helpful if the staff could take another look at the projects and have an analysis and past recommendation as well as a current recommendation. Mr. Galleberg agreed and stated that he needed more information and a determination needed to be made on how to handle projects technically on public property, which are not necessarily very public. Ron Hovell noted that Hideaway beach was one of the beaches with the most significant erosion problems and he felt that it was necessary to proceed with the beach renourishment, but he also needed more information about the access improvements. Gary Galleberg asked if there was a need to talk more about project cost sharing. Ron Hovell noted that he just wanted to bring it up to see if they could adapt a policy during this summer. Mr. Galleberg then stated that at the June meeting, they would look at how the state and possibly other counties would handle this public/private issue, which he felt would be useful to them. Mr. Strapponi asked if aerials could be made available at the next meeting, as well. Mr. Galleberg thought this would be helpful for the board and for the public. d. Project Cost-sharing Addressed previously. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION None at this time. SCHEDULE NEXT MEETING Mr. Galleberg restated that the meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 13 at 1:30 P.M. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Galleberg called adjournment at 3:30 P.M. NapLes DaiLy News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of PubLication NapLes Daily News PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEERING 3301TANIAHI TRL E BLDG H NAPLES FL 34112 REFERENCE: 059~05 #20~107 58~27584 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HER State of FLorida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority/ personally appeared B. Lamb/ ~ho on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News/ · daily newspaper published at Naples/ in Collier County, FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples OaiLy News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County/ FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County/ FLorida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples/ in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of I year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount/ rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pubLiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 06,/02 AD SPACE: 58.000 ]NCH FILED OH: 04/02/02 Sig~ture of Affiant S~orn to and Subscribed';"b~f~e me ? PersonaLLy known by me ~o~yo~p~ DOnna Ch~ My Co~i~on D~3~ Exp(res September 11, 2~5 16J FTEE; 3, O d Bus ness : a; Goodland C v c As, TDC gronf ide sond Y DECI- ' BY THE ORY RE- ' MATTER ) AT. THIS ME:E~ING~ HE WILL NEED A: RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND: THAT FOR SUCH PUR- POSE~ HE'.MA~ NEED TO ENSUE ~HAT/A VER- BATIM~RECORi~) OF'THE PROCEED NGS IS MADE, ,WHCH RECORD IN- LUDES THE :TESTI~O' I Y :AND EVIDENCE IPON WHICH THE AP- PEAL ISTO BE~ASED; ~orll 2 No,2009396 1 April 5, 2002 16J 1 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE April 5, 2002 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee met on this date at 1:45 p.m. In REGULAR SESSION in Room 216, Building H of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRPERSON: Gary Galleberg Anthony P. Pires, Jr. David Roellig John P. Strapponi Ashley D. Lupo Robert B. Stakich William Kroeschell James L. Snediker ALSO PRESENT: Ron Pennington Ron Hovell, Public Utilities Engineering Department Jon Staiger Page 1 April 5, 2002 16J 1 (The following proceedings commenced, Misters Kroeschell, Strapponi, and Roellig were not present:) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We'll call to order the April 5th special meeting of the Coastal Advisory Committee. I'll note for the record that I'm Gary Galleberg. We have in attendance Mr. Pires, Mr. Snediker, Mr. Stakich, and Ms. Lupo. We also have a pending new member. Mr. Ron Pennington is in back. He's been nominated by the Naples City Council, and that -- that nomination will go to the county commission. We have every expectation he'll be joining us for the May meeting. We have for the -- this is a very informal setting, of course. Before the committee we have two items that have been requested to be added, and I think we ought to discuss them for a minute and then take a motion and vote whether we will add them. One is the Barefoot Beach restoration project which we had previously turned down as being more in the private interest than the public interest. Representatives are here today, and I would like to give them a chance to speak. That doesn't indicate endorsement or lack of endorsement on what they want to say, but just the opportunity to speak I think should be afforded that group. And Mr. Hovell wants to update us on the boat that sank and broke up offshore. So if we could take those one by one -- if everyone agrees with me that we might hear the Barefoot Beach representatives' case, so to speak, I'll take that motion. (Mr. Strapponi entered the room.) MR. PIRES: I think -- just a point of order for the -- I'm not sure how formal we are in reconsideration issues in the fact that last week we had this item -- last meeting -- excuse me -- we had this item as part of our scheduled consideration. And that maybe is a question best directed to Ron. Do you-all have for our committee a sense of a more formal reconsideration policy where a member of the committee would ask that it be brought back for reconsideration or not? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I don't think ~- I'm not aware of a specific policy for this committee. I do know how it works on the Naples City Council, and that is kind of the way I'm doing it, that if the majority of -- it needs to be brought up by somebody who voted in the majority. That would be a no vote and -- and then we need a second. Then if the majority of the' committee then agrees we can take a look at it again, we do. And we'll take another vote. That's how it works at Naples City Council. I'm not aware specifically of a county commission procedure or if there's a state procedure. But I think -- I think what we're doing, you know, will serve us well. MR. PIRES: Thank you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So would anyone want to make a motion that we hear~.the representatives from Barefoot Beach? MR. SNEDIKER: I'll make a motion. Page 2 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Do we have a second? MS. LUPO: I'll second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: All those in favor? (Mr. Kroeschell entered the room.) THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry. That was Mr. Snediker and Ms. Lupo? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We have -- during -- during my conversations -- Mr. Strapponi walked in, and now we just had Mr. Kroeschell. And I'm going to restate the motion so that we all can vote, and that is that we have -- that we have representatives here from Barefoot Beach who would like to give us an explanation about their proposal for beach restoration which we had turned down as part of our meeting last time. We have a motion by Mr. Snediker, a second by Miss Lupo to -- to let them make a presentation. All those in favor say aye. MR. SNEDIKER: I have a question. Do we have an opinion from the county attorney on this issue? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We don't have the benefit of the county attorney on -- on reconsideration, but I think -- MR. SNEDIKER: No. I -- I mean on the original subject of whether it's available for TDC funds. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I don't believe we have the county attorney's opinion on that matter. We do have it on another matter, right. MR. HOVELL: And that's right. We didn't specifically ask eligibility on this particular project, and I -- I -- I would suppose it to be that it is -- as far as is it beach restoration or not and does it meet the Florida Statute, I think the answer would be yes, it is eligible. MR. SNEDIKER: Okay. MR. HOVELL: I think the other issues that we addressed last time were more, you know, related to a, yes, but it's private property, and how -- what's the -- what does this committee and the county want the policy to be for dealing with all those beaches that aren't currently maintained by the county but perhaps could be. And Barefoot's one. Pelican Bay is one. And, you know, we haven't come to grips with that. MS. LUPO: Does Hideaway fall within that definition? MR. HOVELL: No. Hideaway -- Hideaway kind of went through this however many years ago, and I think you'll hear that as an example of why they're asking you to reconsider. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Quite frankly, I think this motion boils down to do we want to hear from the public. I don't know why we wouldn't want to hear from the public. And that's, frankly, the sense of the motion -- ,. MR. STRAPPONI: Mr. Chairman, I'm coming in on the end of this. I don't know if the floor is still open for comment or question, but how long is this presentation Page 3 April 5, 2002 16J 1 estimated to take? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I don't have an answer for that. (Mr. Roellig entered the room.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I don't have the answer for that. MR. STRAPPONI: Is there someone present that does? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Identify yourself, please. MR. POFF: For the record, Michael Poff, Coastal Engineering Consultants, representative for Barefoot Beach. I'll be brief, less than five minutes. MR. SNEDIKER: I'll withdraw my motion. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: You'll withdraw? MR. SNEDIKER: (Nodded head.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: All right. Do we have a motion to hear people? MR. STRAPPONI: Five minutes. I -- I make a motion that we give them an opportunity to present to us a position. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have a second? MS. LUPO: Second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Motion by Mr. Strapponi, second by Ms. Lupo. All those in favor say aye. MR. ROELLIG: Aye. MR. STRAPPONI: Aye. MS. LUPO: Aye. MR. STAKICH: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? MR. PIRES: Aye. MR. SNEDIKER: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That was Mr. Pires and Mr. Snediker, I believe, in opposition. I vote in favor, so we are -- MR. KROESCHELL: I didn't -- I didn't get a chance to vote. I vote in favor, too. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. We are then 6 to 2 in favor of heating them. The second thing to~'add to the agenda is simply an update by Mr. Hovell regarding the boat that broke up and sank near shore. And I guess we could do that under new business, but I've already marked on this let's make a motion, do business. So do we have a motion in favor of that? MR. KROESCHELL: I so move. MR. STRAPPONI: I'll second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Seconded by Mr. Strapponi. All in favor say aye. ~. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It passes 8-0. Page 4 April fi, 2002 16J 1 MR. HOVELL: If it's okay, Mr. Chairman, I'll -- I'll go out of order and do the quick boat update, because, in part, I -- I wanted to explain while I'll be more disorganized today than perhaps you might otherwise have seen me be. I've spent all morning dealing with the fact that yesterday we had a boat sink just off of Vanderbilt Beach. It was a wooden-hull boat about 65 feet long and some type of houseboat. It had an upper-deck railing that you could see in this morning's newspaper. And all that wood has disintegrated into, you know, in essence, a pile of 2-by-4s strewn up and down the beach from the -- from the very north end of Vanderbilt Beach right at the county -- or I mean Delnor Wiggins State Park line all the way down -- we've gotten complaints as far down as Pelican Bay. And we're anticipating it might even go down to Park Shore. Big mess. Further complicated by the fact that the -- the owner had called a company in. Apparently it was part of some association that helps boaters in distress. And so they called somebody in who had showed up to help perhaps salvage the boat. And, of course, it sank and immediately started breaking up. The contractor has been there now for a day plus, figured out that the owner can't really pay, and he's been going around to the state, the Coast Guard, and every office in the county you can possibly name, you know, in essence, hoping that somebody will step forward and -- and fund him to do that. But, of course, we have standing contracts to go clean up at least the high and dry part of the beach. So, you know, we showed up with our equipment, and he got rather upset and -- anyway, it's just been a long morning. I just got down here in time to -- to bring my box. I didn't get a chance to see if the room was set up in any way that we might want it set up, and so I guess we'll make do with it with the way it is. And we're looking at about almost a week worth of work to try and clean up all the -- all the debris out there. So I'm sure between the papers and the -- and the TV and what not, you know, you'll hear more about this over the next day. We did put out a press release to try and help answer some of the questions that are --. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Is there a mechanism for reimbursement from the boat owner? MR. HOVELL: As best I can tell, you know, in a situation like this when the initial indication is there's -- there's no mechanism for the boat owner to pay outright that we keep track of the costs that we're expending, and I'll refer all that to the county attorney's office. And they may or may not seek to -- to sue them, depending on their understanding of it, you know, if there's anything to sue against. MR. STRAPPONI: Ron, was there much fuel on board? Was it much of a spill? MR. HOVELL: Yeah. There were estimated 260 gallons between the engine and the f~el tank, and that's the Coast Guard's responsibility to clean it up. And they, too, were kind of standing on the beach with no -- at least the last I heard, no known plan to Page 5 April 5, 2002 16J 1 do anything with it. MR. STRAPPONI: Do we know if it was gas or diesel? . MR. HOVELL: Diesel. MR. STRAPPONI: It was diesel? MR. HOVELL: Because there was a spare 55-gallon drum of diesel that washed up on the beach. I don't think it had ruptured or anything, but that was in the paper or at least the website version of the paper. Jon? MR. STAIGER: Other than the fuel, was there any other contamination problem? MR. HOVELL: Well, lots of screws and nails. It's not just wood. It's kind of dangerous wood, if you will. And there is -- there is -- at one of the offshore sandbars, there is a section that's stuck out there with the steering column and what not kind of, you know, sticking out of the water. And even if any of us wanted to do anything, the winds have picked up again this afternoon, and there's 3- to 4-foot seas out there. So nobody's out there trying to do anything except other than, you know, cleaning up what we can on the beach and watching the situation continue to unfold. MR. STAIGER: Disintegrate. MR. HOVELL: Yeah. MR. STRAPPONI: Where do we stand right now? Is the contractor proceeding? MR. HOVELL: Oh, yeah. No, we're -- our contractor. We had -- we had Lightnet Contracting who is our standing fixed-term contractor that will bring equipment to clean up various things on the beach. This is just one of them. MR. STRAPPONI: I would think that it's a given because it sounds like a health problem or danger. MR. HOVELL: And he was already mobilized by Naples beach as part of the rock-sifting program, so we just -~ we just stole some equipment from that project and sent them on up there. So they were there since just before lunch, less than an hour from the time I found out until the time they got there. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Since we have no way of -- a member of the public for Barefoot Beach presentation, why don't we do that now. So if -- Mr. Poff, if you would like to come up and make your presentation ... MR. POFF: Would anybody else like a copy? Again, for the record, my name is Michael Poff with Coastal Engineering Consultants. And I appreciate the opportunity to at least discuss this project before all of you and ask that you take it under reconsideration. ~. Lely Barefoot Beach has historically been a very stable beach. During the design of the Collier County beach restoration project when we looked at the historical shoreline Page 6 April 5, 2002 16J 1 erosion rate, Lely Barefoot Beach was very stable. It was not included in the project because of the stable conditions. It did not need to be renourished. Because of that no erosion control line was set. An erosion control line is set, in part, with the cooperation of the property owners, the county, and the DEP. We are going to do a beach restoration project, widen the beach, both above and below mean high water, the concept being to set the erosion control line at the preconstruction mean high water line. That will then forever demarcate the ownership between private and public lands. So by nature of a beach project or a dune project or a restoration project or a coastal structure project, these projects are often working on private property. If the county is doing the work, they typically obtain construction easements from the property owners to allow them to go in and do the work. In this case during Tropical Storm Gabrielle, as you're all very familiar with, the dunes, the beaches were severally damaged during that storm. Plants were lost; sand was overwashed; sand was eroded. Lely Barefoot Beach was no exception. The Barefoot Beach condominiums put together a project, went to the county, got a permit under the DEP emergency order back in October. Since that time they've been trying to get a vehicle-on-the-beach permit to do the work that would meet the 10- pounds-per-square-inch requirement for sea turtle protection. That's very difficult to do. The county -- what they do in their projects is for upland sand hauls for dune projects, they bring loaders and tracks to the beach. They do the project; then they till the beach like their contracting is used to till the beach to 36 inches to meet compaction requirements. Barefoot Beach hired us to help them get the permits, get the dunes reconstructed. In doing so, we agreed that we would monitor the beaches, do the beach tilling, meet the compaction requirements. They were allowed to bring the trucks on the beach. I would pose that the county has historically done projects where there is no erosion control line set or little public access or the public access and parking is at great distances. I'm not criticizing any of these projects; I fully support all of them. In fact, I helped design and permit some of them. I just presented them in my letter to you as examples of projects similar to this in nature where the county has worked on private property, has placed sand, has done dune restoration, has cleaned the beach, etc., etc. Almost all of the things that we're requesting have been done by the county on projects like these. To conclude, my client recognizes your concerns: debris removal, no erosion control line, private lands, public access at great distances. They asked me to revise the application. We have focused just on the cost of the sand and the cost of the plants and the irrigation of the plants. And, as I said, I would appreciate your reconsideration of their request for your support to go before the TDC, and I can answer any questions or at Page 7 April 5, 2002 16J 1 least try to answer any questions. Thank you for your time. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Pires. MR. PIRES: If I may, thank you, Mr. Chairman. A few questions. I guess from the standpoint of the entity that's applying for, is there such an entity known as Barefoot Beach Condominiums, or is there a master corporate entity, because I don't believe that to be a legal entity ? MR. POFF: It's the Barefoot Beach Condominium Association. There is a master association in Lely Barefoot Beach. I believe there's several subassociations. This is one of the subassociations to the master association. MR. PIRES: From the perspective -- up in Barefoot Beach have there ever been situations the last few years where people have been building -- I'll call it -- seaward of the control line where they have been making improvements, either on back of dune systems or seaward control line without getting permits from Collier County? MR. POFF: I don't know the answer to that question. I believe that Barefoot Beach condos were built back in the early '90s, late '80s. I know that our firm had something to do with the PUD for all of Lely Barefoot Beach, but I don't know when those condominiums were exactly built. I would think those condos would have had full permits. I know I've worked for the condos in getting permits for, like, paver improvements and dune walkover improvements. As far as one of the condominium buildings I don't believe was built unpermitted in Collier County. MR. PIRES: The only reason I raise that, Mr. Chairman -- and I have a couple more questions -- the Development Services Advisory Committee, there was a discussion about changes to the Land Development Code to address the situations of violations of the county's ordinances seaward of various buildings, including buildings in Lely Barefoot Beach. If I recall correctly, the number was there were 22 violations, and I'm not sure it was all in Lely Barefoot Beach or in The Strand where the county ordinances were not being complied with. I think it's just important to know what other issues are out there before this committee takes a -- makes a recommendation on this particular application. MR. POFF: Do you know if they were specific to the condominiums? MR. PIRES: Once ~again, I wasn't sure. I just heard some of that discussion at Wednesday's meeting. I wasn't there at the prior meeting by the code enforcement staff. Mr. Hovell -- Ron. MR. HOVELL: Mr. Chairman, as you'll recall when -- when I got the call about possibly adding this to the agenda, I called you, and you had asked me to provide some background information as well. So perhaps I could share that information, and they may answer some of the questions that you may have in your mind. , CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Let's do that now. MR. HOVELL: One of the things that you thought we ought to point out or Page 8 remind folks of is where we're talking about. it is. Long day. April 5, 2002 And if I didn't do this upside down -- yeah, · MR. STAIGER: Water is west. MR. HOVELL: Wiggins Pass and the county line at -- I never get the name right -- Bonita Beach Springs -- Bonita Beach Road, and so in general we tend to think of this whole section as easily called Barefoot Beach. But to be more specific, down somewhere around here (indicating) it becomes state/county-owned land, certainly managed as a preserve anyway. And then it's -- basically from here to here is the overall PUD. But in looking into the records, there's actually four -- I'm not sure what the right word is -- subassociations, perhaps, or separate landowner associations under the master association. I don't know if anybody else can address it, but there's something called The Cottages, the Barefoot Beach condominiums. Oh, no, there's a marina club or something MR. POFF: Miramar. MR. HOVELL: Miramar Beach Club, then the Barefoot Beach Property Owners' Association, which is in essence the single-family homes. And I think they were all done -- according to the clerk's office, the PUD was done in phases. And so as each phase was turned over, it was turned over to that association from the developer. So there are four associations, but I -- you know, I can't really address their legal -- you know, legal position in life. I did ask the attorney to come today, but the last-minute message I got was that they had moved the TDC meeting up to two o'clock, so she couldn't be here. The second thing is, you know, Michael and I have talked about this some because obviously he's been asking how the -- how to go through the permit or the grant application process. And we had initially heard about this project at the county level because of the sand-on-the-beach issue. The turtle staff tends to get very concerned with where and when you're putting sand on the beach, where it's coming from, has the state approved it, etc. The permit was applied for within the -- whatever it was, 30- or 60-day window under the state emergency order to recover from Tropical Storm Gabrielle. But on the flip side, no -- depending on who you ask in the state, you get different answers on whether or not and how long that permit is good for, and I think the same thing happens at the county level. So my understanding, which is I'm sure different than lots of other different people's understandings, is that you had to -- you had to provide the notice to the state within about the first 30 or 60 days, and in theory you were supposed to have at least started construction if not finished it within that emergency time frame. And when we just had DEP down here a day or two ago looking at our rock-removal program, you know, I asked him what his understanding of it was. And he said -- of course, this is on the code enforcement side. And he said absolutely long ago expired; it's supposed to Page 9 have been done, for what it's worth. Now, I'm sure if I could have gotten Barbara Burgeson or somebody from the county office that deals with permits, I think it's been their understanding that once they received the permit application -- and I guess the way it was worded, it wasn't even really an application; it was more of a notice -- that they were just going to allow it to happen all the way up to turtle season. You know, there doesn't seem to be a clear-cut answer as far as permits for this particular job, and I definitely can't address, you know, what may have happened in the past. I don't remember if you had asked me to address any other -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: You had mentioned to me and maybe you can flush it out -- and it's noted in Mr. Poft's presentation -- the unusual nature of the property there, that the beach is actually private property, is it not? MR. HOVELL: It is. In essence, he did address that. The state -- the publicly owned lands starts at, in essence, the mean high waterline, although there's some, I think, it's 19-year average, and I'm not sure who's supposed to tell you where that is. That could be 5 feet out into the surf or 10 feet up the shore. I don't know exactly where that line is, but it's a moving property line because we've not done a renourishment there. There is no permanent forever more kind of property line like there is in Naples, Park Shore and Vanderbilt and Hideaway and Marco Island. And so it is -- it is a moving target right now. And I think the other thing that we talked about last time was -- was easements that go along with these types of things if the county was going to do any type of maintenance on those beaches. And that's actually come up in two different ways over the last six months anyway. One was the request -- I think it may have been from the same group -- to do -- potentially do some beach raking there. Then there were some back and forth that the county just can't do it as part of the current program. Maybe we could do it with reimbursement. You know, that's when I went to the county attorney's office, and they started talking about, as you're probably alluding to, the lawsuit with the master association, are we really sure we want to be trying to do contracts and that kind of stuff. And the other time was right after Tropical Storm Gabrielle we were approached, I think, by the property owners' association, the single-family homes, about coming up there and helping put the sand that had washed up into all their yards and common areas back onto the beach. And that particular one we did take to the county attorney's office. And it was, you know, even though it's putting sand on the beach which could be classified as beach renourishment We were -- of course, it would have been county equipment too -- we would be assisting private property owners, and the county attorney's office said no, it's not appropriate to do that. ,. MR. PIRES: Because the test probably generally is you can't use public monies primarily for private purpose, and that's how it possibly could have been argued or Page 10 April 5, 2002 1 construed. MR. HOVELL: You know, without having a chance to remember to grab that and bring it down to tell you exactly what was said, that's why I was hoping that the attorney was going to be here. MR. PIRES: And the other -- the issue that I was referencing that I heard first at the DSAC meeting was with regard to not -- not particularly beach renourishment activities but other activities, with grassing over and paving over areas, so that may be something --. MR. HOVELL: Yes, because, as I say, I don't know all the background. MR. PIRES: I'm not sure I did. Once again, I had mentioned about the litigation. I don't think it's appropriate. The litigation has been going on for years between the county and the master association over utilization over access south as well as the guardhouse. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Miss Lupo, do you have a question? MS. LUPO: I did. I wanted to know if that area that's not renourishable is going to negatively impact the southerly beaches such as Barefoot Beach park. What's the movement as far as the area? MR. HOVELL: I don't know if anybody has a drawing of it with them, but I believe the restoration isn't -- you know, it isn't out close to the water. It's the dunes. It's recreating the dunes, both in height and the plantings that were on the dunes. So I think it's more from a storm protection point of view than from a, you know, height or width of the beach point of view. MS. LUPO: And what is Maura's opinion as far as the baggage with the turtles if the dunes are restored? MR. HOVELL: No, I don't have her opinion. I would tend to think her reaction would be that having places for turtles to nest is a good thing. But whether these dunes and how much they -- MS. LUPO: You don't know the -- as far as the extent of the turtle activity in that area is? MR. HOVELL: No. Actually Michael might know because he may have seen reports from that. I know 'they monitor up there, but I don't know what the results are. I'm sure Maura would have been here, but they have -- I think it's a statewide turtle conference this week. MR. POFF: Speak to the points you made, Ron? As far as permits go, the Barefoot Beach condominiums applied for and received a coastal construction setback line permit from Collier County through April 30th, 2002, during the time period that DEP's emergency order allowed that to occur. The very first thing I did when I was hired by Barefoot was call DEP. I spoke to Jenny Howard, who is the field representative for Collier County, and asked her, must I reapply for a coastal construction setback line Page 11 April 5, 2002 16J 1 permit from DEP. She stated to me, no, that you do not have to. If that permit from Collier County was issued during the emergency order time frame, you're allowed to work until the expiration of that permit. So the other item would be, just to clarify that, my client is not the master association. The lawsuit between Collier County and the master association is -- is an issue, but it's not the Barefoot Beach Condominium Association. MR. PIRES: The Barefoot Beach Condominium Association is a member of the master association; correct? MR. POFF: Correct. MR. PIRES: They are helping fund that litigation against the county. MR. POFF: I can't tell you if they're funding that or not. I didn't ask that question before I came here today. As far as sea turtle activity, I've been coordinating this with Maura Krause; we've been e-mailing. She has recommended her approval to Barbara Burgeson, Steve Lenberger and staff, with regard to the project and us not meeting the 10 PSI requirements and allowing us to do the tilling. And as far as the nest numbers, I don't have the numbers memorized, but I do know that Lely Barefoot Beach is one of the most prolific nesting areas in Collier County. Part of that is because we have not had to do activities on it before. It has never been disturbed for restoration or coastal structures or things of that nature. Thank you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Dr. Staiger. DR. STAIGER: One comment about the -- the restoration of the dune on -- on basically private property, when we did the Collier County beach restoration project on Naples beach, the erosion control line in most places was out on the dry sand beach. In a few areas the dry sand beach basically was not existent, and so the ECL was up against seawall. But the majority of Naples beach, the erosion control line was out on the beach 25, 30 feet beyond the vegetation line. And when the project was done, a 20-foot swath of dune vegetation was planted from the vegetation line out. In all -- in almost, I would imagine, probably 75 percent of that re -- rerestored dune was restored on private property that was landward of the erosion control line. And so -- but -- but we have the construction easements to do all that and a clear understanding to the adjacent upland property owners that if you let us restore the beach in front of your property, the sand goes all the way up to a logical stopping point on your property, and we do all this other work, and you get that benefit, and the city has always maintained the dry sand beach is publicly accessible anyway whether somebody claims ownership of it or not. But the -- the majority of that restored dune in the City of Naples was probably on property that was inland of the erosion control line, so it was still private property, the assumption being that restoring the dune is an environmentally beneficial thing to do. It's a reservoir of sand in case of a storm. It's habitat for a lot of different things, including a place for turtles to nest. And so there was never any question, really, about the -- the, you Page 12 April 5, 2002 163 1 know, appropriateness of -- of doing the vegetation project, regardless of whether it was in front of the erosion control line or behind it. So putting dune vegetation up on -- you know, restoring the dune in Lely Barefoot Beach is a reasonable thing to do from the environmental standpoint and the -- even if it's private property, it's - it's beneficial environmentally, whether or not the committee feels that's reasonable because it is private property and there has been this ongoing hassle about access to it. You know, that's -- I'm not addressing that. Michael can attest to that a lot of that work was done inlands of the erosion control. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We are considering this under the rubric of TDC funds, and that is really our issue. Mr. Hovell. MR. HOVELL: And, if I could, you know, for those of you who may not already know, the process for these grant applications, they're called TDC grant applications that the Coastal Advisory Committee makes a recommendation; actually the Tourist Development Council makes a recommendation. And the Board of County Commissioners has to decide. So the -- the -- you know, should the -- should the association take a negative recommendation that they could, in essence, withdraw it, but if they do not, I believe it goes to all three groups, and there will be other chances for them to make further arguments if they so desire. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So do we have any other questions or comments? MR. SNEDIKER: Do I understand that this work would be completed by April 30th of this year? It doesn't say which year. MR. POFF: This year, correct, except for the irrigation of the plants. All the sand and dunes will be done before April 30th. MR. SNEDIKER: But today is April 5th. It has to go to TDC and the Board of County Commissioners? MR. POFF: We're asking for reimbursement. MR. SNEDIKER: Has the work started? MR. POFF: Yes, yes. MR. STRAPPONI: I have one question: I'd like your opinion as to how you feel this restoration in the Barefoot Beach area is going to help develop tourism because we're charged with the responsibility of tourist development. That's what the taxes are for there in the first place. MR. POFF: Sure. There's a beach access to the south. It's the county state park. There's also a beach access at the north, at the county line with Lee County. And so you have two public accessible points that not only residents of Collier County are using but tourists are using. And so from that standpoint this beach is heavily used. In fact, we had to shut down for construction because it's been -- was spring break. Everybody that was heres there were too many people on the beach to work. A lot were residents, but granted, there were some tourists there too. People running and walking the beach from Page 13 April 5, 2002 163 1 access to access are using the beach. Jon, you said it better than I could have possibly said it, and I thank you for your comments. From a holistic view of the beach management process, a dune is essential for storm protection, reservoir for sand, the environmental benefits that go with that that the TDC also use for those things, recreation, and for environmental habitat, creation, protection, those kind of things, so I offer that to you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have any other questions or -- or conunents? MR. KROESCHELL: Yes, I have a question. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Kroeschell. MR. KROESCHELL: I saw in here that you are 2200 feet from the Barefoot Beach park on the south. MR. POFF: Correct. MR. KROESCHELL: How far are you from the beach access to the north --. MR. POFF: It's a little over a mile. MR. KROESCHELL: 5,000 feet. MR. POFF: From the north end of the property it's about a mile and a quarter. (Ms. Robinson entered the room.) MR. HOVELL: See if I can do this. You might be able to tell better than I, but I think the condos are in this area, and the county park section is down here, and the -- the other public access is up here. So you could almost say it's close to the middle. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We'll note for the record that Jacqueline Robinson, one of the county attorneys, has just joined us. Any other questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you, Mr. Poff. MR. POFF: Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Last time we made a decision that we were not going to recommend funding for this. I think since we've reopened it and heard the presentation we should take a motion and vote. And obviously the two choices are to ratify our prior decision or to -- to overturn it. So I'll entertain a motion if anyone wants to do that. MR. PIRES: I make a recommendation not to recommend approval. Maintain the position. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Motion to not recommend approval, which is to ratify our prior decision. Do we have a second? MR. STRAPPONI: I'll second it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Strapponi seconded. All those in favor say aye. ..~ Aye. MR. PIRES: Aye. Page 14 April 5, 2002 1fi 1 MR. STRAPPONI: Aye. MR. SNEDIKER: Aye. MS. LUPO: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? MR. ROELLIG: Aye. MR. STAKICH: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: are voting in the negative. THE COURT REPORTER: Pardon me? MR. STRAPPONI: One abstention. MR. KROESCHELL: I -- I can't vote on it. We have 6 -- 6 ayes. Mr. Roellig and Mr. Stakich CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do you have a conflict? MR. KROESCHELL: No. I guess I've got to vote then, don't I? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yeah. MR. KROESCHELL: I'll vote negative. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So the -- the vote, then, is 5 to 3 with Mr. Roellig, Mr. Stakich, and Mr. Kroeschell dissenting. Thank you. Why don't we move next -- we'll go back in order to Item 3-A which I think is the Goodland Canal proposal and Mr. Hovell. MR. HOVELL: Let's see, Goodland Canal. Is there someone from Goodland Civic Association here? Oh, that's right. I'm sorry. I didn't recognize you, too hectic today. Could you introduce yourself, please. MR. NORMAN: Yes, sir. I'm Dennis Norman. I'm vice president of the Goodland Civic Association. MR. HOVELL: Thank you for coming today. Jacqueline Robinson and I -- and Jacqueline just came in and joined us -- went down and met with some reps of the Goodland Civic Association. He was kind enough to take us around on a boat and show us the areas, and so I did refer the question to the county attorney's office, and I do have her opinion here. You know, you'll get a copy of this, but to -- to provide the short answer, most of the pages is the form that describes what the question is. The response is after reviewing the actual configuration of the canals in question, they do not appear eligible for funding the tourist development tax revenues, which is, you know, what I had guessed up front. You know, I think the question from a legal standpoint is, can an argument be made that any of the areas that need to be addressed in some way, shape, or form are related to either beach maintenance and/or inland, lake, or fiver maintenance, because those are the only categories that are mentioned in the statute. And that's what we based our previous or I should say you based your previous negative recommendation upon. I believe we put this on the agenda again today -- or, that's fight, it was continued Page 15 l)pr31 5, 2002 1 from the last meeting. I think you were looking mostly to have the county attorney's opinion, which we do now have, and we do have a rep from the Goodland Civic Association. So I think if -- at this point if you have any questions either for me or the Goodland Civic Association, now would be the time or, for that matter, the county attorney, now would be the time. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Norman, did you want to say anything or make a presentation? MR. NORMAN: Well, I'm not real prepared, but I would like to plead our cause. Some of the canals that are shoaling over, we do have tourists that come and stay at the motel and at Margood and the Pink House Motel, and they're -- they're shoaling over. They bring their boats in, and they fish, you know, mullet season. Then some folks stay all winter. Like the Margood Canal is starting to shoal over. The one into Buzzards Bay, the people going into Stan's in there on Sunday and the tourists and bring their boats and all it's starting to shoal the entrance of it. A couple other places, but I -- in my opinion, it does affect the tourists. I mean, we've only got a few people that really fish for a living down there now. It's mostly tourists that come in, bring their boat and stay and two or three months or the winter now, and that's about all. I just wanted to bring that up. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Thank you. Do we have questions? Do we have comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think we have -- obviously, we have a legal opinion which probably would carry a good deal of weight, and then we have the -- more physical issue of certainly parts of Goodland are tourist related but parts are not, and I think it's the determination of -- that the -- this particular request relates to canals that are not really tourist related; is that correct? MR. HOVELL: Perhaps you want to ask the attorney. I mean, I think the interpretation is that regardless -- the way I view looking at grant applications is, number 1, are they eligible against comparing them with the Florida statute, and then if they are, how much of a tourist impact do they have? And unfortunately in this case, the -- the first test, I don't believe, has been met, and, therefore, it -- I hate to say it, but it doesn't matter for these tourist tax -- how much of the tourist impact it is. I mean, you could make a claim that you could have a huge tourism impact by building some inland facility, but that's not what's allowable in the Florida statute. The argument of tourism really doesn't matter if it's not eligible initially, and I think that's where we're at. -~ CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, that For me, at least, certainly clarifies it. Do we have any other questions or comments? Page 16 April 5, 2002 !6J 1 MS. LUPO: Is that the opinion that they're not eligible for TDC funds? I just wanted to know the reason. MS. ROBINSON: The main reason is the fact that the tourist development tax is a tax, which means that you should not extrapolate and interpret it to mean something other than what it said. And in the category that deals with water, which is the beach category, it clearly says that it will finance beach park facilities, beach improvement, maintenance, renourishment, restoration, and erosion control, including paths and inlet maintenance shoreline protection enhancements, cleanup, or restoration of inland lakes and rivers, to which there is public access, as these uses relate to the physical preservation of the beach, the shoreline, or the inland lake or river. There is no apparent -- readily apparent connection between the canals and any of the uses that are set forth in that particular part of the state statute. You would have to really stretch it to get those Goodland canals somewhere out to the beach area. It just isn't even close to it. We went out and looked at it, and it just doesn't seem to fit the categories that they're set forth in the state statute. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you, Miss Robinson. Do we have any other questions or comments? MS. LUPO: I have just a -- a question. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Miss Lupo. MS. LUPO: So basically if it's inland rivers, it's not considered either a inland river or a beach, or it has to be directly related to the beach or --. MS. ROBINSON: It can be an inland lake or river to which there is public access. MS. LUPO: And Stan's isn't on an inland fiver where there is public access to it. MS. ROBINSON: No, the canals that I viewed appeared to be man-made canals. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Norman. MR. NORMAN: The entrance to Buzzard Bay, Stan's is on Marco River. And to the Pink House Motel and Margood, all these three places empty into the Marco River. MS. LUPO: We dredge the Marco River? No. MR. HOVELL: No. And -- and that's an area that, you know, again, perhaps it's a matter of opinion. But in looking at the charts for the area, it shows the Big Marco River running from Marco Island and emptying into Goodland Bay and then Goodland Bay and Coon Key Pass and Blue Fill Creek or whatever the fight name is. And so I'm not even sure we could necessarily agree that the body of water around Goodland is the Marco River. I believe it's a bay, and it's not even an inland bay. It's a -- it's a -- I don't know if coastal bay is quite the right word, but it's a tidal bay. It's not -- and, again, so that's why we didn't feel that it meets -- meets the statute. .,. MS. ROBINSON: And that's not to say that we -- or at least I didn't make for an opinion because the canals truly look as if they need to be dredged. But I don't think Page 17 that's appropriate funding source. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, then we all have to keep in mind, the question is is it a good idea or would it be nice or whatever, it's whether it fits within -- within our mandate of the TDC regulations. Do we have any other questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Is anyone prepared to make a motion? MR. STAKICH: I make a motion that we deny the question for Goodland Civic Association to use TDC money for this purpose. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Motion by Mr. Stackich to deny. Do we have a second? MR. PIRES: Second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Second by Mr. Pires. All those in favor say aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: The motion passes 8 to 0. Thank you, and thank you, Mr. Norman. MR. NORMAN: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. MS. ROBINSON: Mr. Chairman -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yes. MS. ROBINSON: -- if my services aren't needed any longer, may I be excused? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yes. I don't -- I don't believe that any of the other - - any of the other items relate to what you prepared. Thank you. MS. ROBINSON: Thank you. MR. NORMAN: Could I ask one question, too, because I've got to go to work? Is there -- where should we look? Is there any place we could look for funding to maybe get some help, the ones that need it, not necessarily every canal? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I don't have the knowledge to speak to state funding, although, you know, there may be money there. I just don't have that expertise. Maybe Mr. Hovell would have a little more knowledge there. But the decision we took today was that it's not eligible for TDC. There is the county general fund, etc., so if it's technically -- if it's a good idea from a technical standpoint, I guess I would suggest that you prepare a submission to the county commission or -- or to take a look at and see if there might be state money available. MR. NORMAN: All right. Thank you. MR. STAKICH: Mr. Chairman, you know, just a suggestion, you know, back some years ago when Marco Island renourished the beaches the first time, they did it with an MSTU. When the first -- when the beach first was renourished on Marco Island, the Page 18 decision was that there were no funds available from either the county or the state, and an MSTU, as it's formed, because it did a -- if I were on the Goodland Association and they asked for a suggestion, I would say I'd form an MSTU for the whole area because it benefits them and not any -- not tourism and that if they formed an MSTU, it really wouldn't be that expensive for everybody. But that's the only answer I see. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That's a good idea without fully getting into that -- that discussion, because those things become complex, that is an approach. And you -- you might perhaps just call Diana Fiala (sic) who represents your area, and -- and she would be able to give you direction, I would think. MR. NORMAN: All right. Thank you. MR. HOVELL: If I could just add, Mr. Chairman, I had mentioned that as a funding possibility when we went down to take the tour. You know, I would be the -- I would still wind up being the office that handles coordinating the formation of an MSTU and ultimately doing the dredging, you know, regardless of the funding source. So, you know, once -- once my construction season is over, perhaps I can be of more assistance in trying to shepherd him through some other process other than this one. MR. STAKICH: Even though the MSTU was formed for that particular purposes of renourishing, it was under the direction -- the renourishment was under the direction of your department. MR. HOVELL: Right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. We'll now move on to Item 3-B, which is the county high wide sand search TDC application. We had deferred a decision on that last time because of the magnitude of the project, both in terms of activity and cost, and we wanted to have a -- a full briefing on -- on what it might entail so, Mr. Hovell. MR. HOVELL: If I could introduce representatives from coastal planning and engineering, Steve Keehn is senior engineer that I tend to deal with most, and I know that Tom Campbell, the president, is in the back. Did you bring anyone else with you? MR. KEEHN: Let me introduce Jeff Andrews. He's our specialist in sand search in our company. He's worked extensively offshore for a number of industries, including our company for quite a few years, and Tom and him today are going to present kind of -- kind of give everybody an 'overview of what's at stake, I think, in looking for sand and pretty much where you stand right now. We've reviewed over quite a few documents over the last month in trying to get a feeling of why you should have a budget size about what we talked about, like I said at your last meeting. So to start off with, Tom. MR. CAMPBELL: First of all, let me talk from -- from this board here, and probably I'll bring it in the middle so everybody can see what this is. Okay. This a -- this is a detailed map of your area, which is -- this is Venice -- I mean Naples here. This is a hydrographic chart -- that's a hydrographic chart or bathymetric chart which was developed from densified information that NOVA has. You've all seen hydrographic Page 19 April ~, 2002 maps or bathymetric maps, navigation charts. And they only use one out of every hundred points when they do their navigation charts, but to have available in more densified fashion these hydrographic charts that we run through our computer and are able to see more offshore features by doing so. So we did that for your area, and we're able to see a much more detailed picture of the offshore sands that are off your area, off the Captiva area. And that's noticeable in this chart, and we'll talk a little bit more about what we're seeing here. You actually see offshore sand mounds, ridges or hills that run pretty much the full length of the county but are dense in certain areas, especially off of Naples beach. And those have high potential for finding sand, and we'll talk about how that fits into your overall sand search. Now, the way we look -- look at your sand search or your needs to spend money possibly on offshore sand investigations are starting off with Hideaway Beach. Hideaway Beach is a project that's coming up. It has identified -- that's in this area here. Let me just point to it. That's in this -- right -- right in here (indicating), and there's some offshore shoal that had been planned to be used for that area. Now, every time you look where you develop a barrow area for a beach project, it involves a number of things, for example, fiber core, side scan, all those kinds of things, to develop a specific barrow area. And the smallest amount of money that we have found has been spent for one specific barrow area has been as low as $200,000. Typically it takes 200 or 300 or 350 to develop one set of barrow areas. So if we have one area here that we know is in the range of two, $300,000, that's one amount of money. Secondly, there's other barrow areas that will be needed in the not-too-distant future for the Naples renourishment project and then, ultimately, possibly for a longer term period for Marco Island area to -- to take a look at renourishing that area. So we're looking at three -- three basic areas, and there has been some -- some research so far as to what -- what apparently -- where apparently those -- those sands are. Now, if the Coastal Engineering consultants had done some work and located in Cape Romano some shoal that looked to have some promise down in this area -- we'll talk a little about how that fits into the overall picture, whether we could use those. But even if those were to be developed, we'd have to develop them by specific application of sand investigation techniques, which would take somewhere in the range of 200 to $300,000 to develop that. So we had given you a budget, I know, if -- from last time in saying that to develop sand resources, you will -- you're probably looking in the range of anywhere from $500,000, if we're looking at multiple places, to 800,000. I think that was the range that you had looked at before. And those sound like big numbers, especially considering the fact that a lot of offshore work has already been done, but let's look at how that lays out from how that may be appropriate numbers for you to look at. Page 20 April 5, 2002 16J 1 I think the range, to kind of give it a range, the $500,000 range would be developing the few bar areas without further offshore investigation just to develop two -- let's say two zones would be the 500. If you're doing a little bit more offshore exploration, it goes as far as the 800. That gives you a little idea. I guess the discussion today, is it reasonable to -- to anticipate that you may want to do some, let's say, more work off of Naples beach to see what's known and maybe -- maybe look in more depth at offshore work. But in looking at offshore sand search -- and I want to refer to the slides now. Let's look a little bit -- if I could turn this around so I can talk with you -- is it still up there --. MR. HOVELL: It moved to the next slide. MR. CAMPBELL: Did it move? Now, basically when you're looking for sand, we look for different types of sand deposits, for the two different types of dredges that we use. First of all, we have the hopper dredge which is a dredge that fills itself up with sand, and it moves along -- it's not stationary. It moves along the offshore area, and it has drag arms which go down to pick up sand. It likes to run over very long areas. It doesn't like small areas, and it cuts very shallow cuts into very long areas. So it's very good. It's efficient for offshore sand ridges, these ridges that have 3- to 5-foot depth for them, and they run for miles. There are a lot of those features off your county. They have the ability to remove rock from -- from the sand, which is a great advantage, because they can put griddles or grates in the surface, and they just let the rocks roll down to one area. The estimated cost for doing that, depending on how far away the bar area is, it takes about a million dollars to get these units in place and have all their pipes floated in place, and then it costs $5 plus 50 cents a mile generally. So if you have something that's 10 miles offshore, you can expect a unit cost of sand on the beach of about $10. And this would be the primary vehicle for getting most of the sand resources that we're aware of. Now, secondly, the other kind of dredge, which is a dredge that was used the last time in -- in -- for your Naples project, is a cutter-head dredge. And the cutter-head dredge, it's more efficient, or it likes to dredge more efficiently with deeper cuts, in other words, deeper holes and smaller areas. They don't like broad areas like the hopper dredges. So in essence they like to dredge down to China. Basically they like to go as deep as they possibly can. They don't have the ability to remove rock from the sand. Now, generally these are used when you can find a barrow area within 4 miles of - - of the shore, and a lot of times you can't do that. They can also be used if -- if the distances are further using scows or barges to full up the barges. That, indeed, was what was done in the previous project. What happens there is that you're using two hydraulic dredges, and you're running the barges from a distant source and off-loading it at the beaoh. The cost of that using cutter heads and scows is a big mob demob cost of about $2 1/2 million, 'cause you're really bringing in two dredges, one to load the barges, one to Page 21 MR. CAMPBELL: MR. SNEDIKER: MR. CAMPBELL: project, that's correct. April 5, 2002 16J 1 off-load the barges, and then you're having these scows or vehicles moving along, and they cost about 40 cents per mile per cubic yard to place on the beach. So to look at the Cape Romano source that we had previously identified and maybe at a volume which we'll talk about in a minute as to why that volume is a million one would cost about $16 million, $16.7 million to restore Naples beach from Cape Romano, for reasons of the higher mob demob at 40 cents a mile. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do you have an -- MR. STRAPPONI: The question was, does that $16.7 million figure include the 2 1/2 million for the setup? Yes, it does. It excludes the setup and the transport. We're talking $16 1/2 million a yard. Yeah, that's correct. 16 1/2 a yard effectively for the Naples CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Then I want to ask, because it might have been on the prior slide. If so, I didn't absorb it. With the hopper method, did you arrive at sort of a global estimate that we can compare to the sixteen million seven? MR. CAMPBELL: Yes. Yes. In fact, here we go. Yeah, we haven't used a hopper estimate for that Cape Romano. All the dredgers are telling us it's too shallow to use a hopper. MR. HOVELL: That's the point I wanted to make. I don't think you connected why you only did the estimate for that one type. It's because Cape Romano is too shallow to use the hopper dredge. MR. CAMPBELL: Too shallow -- a hopper dredge. If you notice here it says the hoppers need about 20 feet of water depth. And the depth of water, most of that is, like, 12 feet of water. So, in essence, you can't use a hopper on Cape Romano. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Also, I realize we're being very general in making that assumption. But if you're 10 miles offshore with the hopper and you're going for a million one in cubic yards, the quick math indicates that's about 11 or 12 million dollars. MR. CAMPBELL: That's correct, that's correct. Yeah. And we'll be looking at some sources that are that distance offshore. Okay. Just looking at a -- a basic nourishment project, looking at the typical cross-section, I have this little guy swimming in a tube there if you note, because a lot of people don't -- don't realize that that's the water level -- we're looking at the beach in a cross-section, and we brought a dredge in to place sand on the beach. That sand is made up of a number of components, and it's important to know what those components are when we're looking are what we're doing in a renourishment project. First of all, we have a design cross-section that we hope will always stay there, never be violated during the whole process. Then we have an amount that we'll expect will move offshore soon after the dredge leaves the site. Within a period of, like, three Page 22 April 5, 2002 1fi 1 years, this first component will move offshore to complete the entire profile to what the coastal engineer calls the depth of closure, basically your area about 9 or 10 feet of depth. You can see, I've still broken those fills, even though it's not a real line, two components. One is the advance nourishment which erodes between nourishment advance and the other one, the design beach which we hope will stay there the entire time frame. So when we're going -- you can see over a period of 5 to 10 years that advance fill has pretty much evaporated or moved away, but we're still left with the design beach. Now we're doing a renourishment as we are in Naples beach. We would come back in with the dredge and replace approximately half of the material that was placed the first time. So if the first nourishment was 1.2 million, we would expect to place somewhere around 600,000. It would be placed, again, in the same general area and be ready to be moved offshore by natural processes. You see the dredge leaves, and sand moves offshore, and then, of course, it phase -- that's the cycle that we're dealing with. So we're really looking at replacement of about half of the material, you know, kind of a target if we're planning for, let's say, barrow areas for Naples beach. One thing to consider is that that scenario that we just played out assumes that the material is exactly compatible with the sand that you have on the beach now. If you go to a finer sand, that wouldn't be the case. So instead of needing maybe 600,000 cubic yards, we might need more. In this case this shows the -- the per -- compatible sand would give us a wider beach. A slightly finer fill would give us less dry beach for the same material, and a -- and a coarser sand would set up more on the beach so we would need less sand. Those are the three parameters we're looking at. When you look offshore, you'll find sands -- Cape Romano drain sizes are. 18 milliliter, which is finer than was used before, so you'll need more of that sand, whereas some of the offshore shoals we're about to talk about and the truck-in sands are actually coarser materials, so you'll need less. MR. PIRES: The time frame indicated, would that increase or decrease based upon being fine sand or coarser sand? Is that a variable? MR. CAMPBELL: It's somewhat of a variable. Actually what we do is we just put the amount of sand based on the grain size that you would need to give you a 5- or 10-year time frame so we'd use less of the coarser sand, more of the finer sand. And we figured -- now, one of the biggest parameters, you know, erosion is one of them. But the shape that the profiles take, now, I've given you kind of the envelope here that you can expect of the various sands that you would find. First of all, let's say we had. 18-millimeter sand like the Cape Romano sand. To provide something like a five -- a renourishment of about 600,000, that sand, you'd have to place a little over a million to do the same job. So, in essence, we have to provide more of that sand. Here the thoroughly compatible sand would provide this profile, and that xvould be about the 600,000, 580,000, and then the coarser sands would be in the range of 450,000. So all of those quantifies are the same, would give us the same dry Page 23 April 5, 2002 163 1 beach that we're looking for ultimately in our project, but they're three, you know, very different numbers relative to grain size, and that's important when you're looking farther - MR. SNEDIKER: MR. CAMPBELL: MR. SNEDIKER: MR. CAMPBELL: MR. SNEDIKER: It depends on relatively. MR. CAMPBELL: When we're talking coarse sands -- You'll look at the sand, it looks fine -- Is this the coarse sand that you have here? Yes. Relatively speaking, from my point of view, that's not coarse. It doesn't have pebbles in it. It's not coarse in that sense. But if the grain sizes are just a little bit bigger individually, we're talking from the grain size of a. 17 millimeter to a .35 millimeter, you can't visually really see that difference unless you really look at it, you know, through a microscope or something like that. But what -- the difference of performance on the beach is astounding. It's a lot less fine; it erodes slower; and it moves offshore less. Now, here's the three that I call -- you see, there's Tom's hill, the Tom's in Tom's hill is me, and that's what Jeff called it, I think, because he wanted to flatter me that we went out to find this big amount of sand. But we'll talk about where that sand is in a minute. But, in essence, these are the sources. We have the Cape Romano source using that cutter head/scow system, and that's where the $16.2 million number comes from. If we found an offshore barrow source off Naples beach -- and we'll talk a little bit about whether that's still possible -- and I had that .24 millimeter sand, which kind of meets the shape of your beach right now, that would be the cheapest option. That barrow source has not been found or locked in on yet. And then there's an offshore hill that's off of Sanibel that's 32 miles away from your Naples project. ! think it's -- this one right here that if we applied those hopper dredging characteristics, we would -- because it's a little bit coarser, we need a little less sand, and that would be about $9 million to place on the beach. That's not a bad number, considering this one you're not sure where you get it. And then the truck haul -- that's .42 millimeter sand -- would require a little bit less than the Tom's hill sand, and it would run, based on current cost, about 9.2 million. So that gives you kind of an overview of the types of sand you could use, the different renourishments that would occur on the Naples Vanderbilt, that whole beach complex. MR. STRAPPONI: MR. CAMPBELL: MR. STRAPPONI: far is that off of Sanibel? Tom, I have a question. Sure. Tom, can I see Sanibel? On that source, distance-wise how MR. CAMPBELL: It's off of Sanibel? MR. STRAPPONI: Uh-huh. MR. CAMPBELL: That's about 11 miles, 12 miles, so it's in federal water. Page 24 April S, 2002 16J 1 Nobody can claim ownership other than minerals management. MR. STRAPPONI: I believe the line is 12 miles, isn't it? MR. KEEHN: It's -- it's 3 -- what is it? 3 leagues or 9 miles in Florida is the division point between federal and state waters, and we've driven -- we've actually drawn it on here, the red line, all the way up on this map is the line. MR. STRAPPONI: Okay. So it's in federal water. MR. KEEHN: And it's also far enough offshore that it virtually it would have no effect on Sanibel Island. It's in such deep water -- MR. STRAPPONI: Unless they want the same source. MR. KEEHN: They've already been taken care of for the near term. I think we actually show their -- their barrow areas are even closer here. MR. CAMPBELL: Let me say, I think as a matter of courtesy, you would coordinate with Captiva and Sanibel because they've decided not to use that source, and they have plenty of sources, but they were the ones who located -- you know, who helped us -- funded us to locate it. And I told them today that I would be sharing the existence of the shoal with you, but they do want to coordinate with them if you indeed decide to use it, but it is an excellent source of sand. MR. STRAPPONI: If we have barrow sources off Naples beach, why are we looking 32 miles away? MR. CAMPBELL: Right now we don't know that you have them directly offshore. We'll talk a little bit about that. That's a question of today. Should we budget enough exploratory money to try to develop those shoals? I -- I think from a visual aspect of what we can see today, it's worth looking a little more at the area directly offshore of the Naples beach to see if we could find the same type of fills or ridge beaches and whether that sand -- now, there was a study done by Coastal Engineering Consultants in 1999 that explored in that area but not necessarily for hills. They were looking for solution pits in the -- in the limestone that might have the sand in it. So looking for solution pits is a little different than looking for hills or hopper-dredging type barrow sites. So we're suggesting today ~- and this is probably the punch line of what we're talking about -- is that it probably is beneficial for you to look directly offshore as part of a Naples investigation because there is a potential savings from the 9 million down to 5.7 million. It would be right -- right offshore. However, I -- you know, if, indeed, that didn't pay off, Tom's Hill is, indeed, available to -- to be used for beach renourishment and it's not an extraordinary cost. In fact, it's quite competitive with the truck haul. It would have less of an impact on the roads -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: One way -- I have financial background as opposed to an engineering background. MR. CAMPBELL: Okay. Page 25 April 5, 2002 1 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So I see things that way. One way to look at k, is it not, is you said five to $800,000 for the search. The request before us is $600,000. One way to look at it is betting 600,000 that you're going to save 3 1/2 million. MR. CAMPBELL: Yeah. I think you're actually bidding 300,000 in a sense because the 500 would be necessary no matter what you did. You see, in a sense if you develop two sets of barrow areas, you would have to put as much fiber core and seismic into similar known areas. The difference would be, do you explore a little bit more off of Naples beach and spend the different -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So the vicinity of 300,000 as a bet that you would find the source that you would cut the 5 million off. MR. CAMPBELL: Right, that's correct. So in essence, that would be the difference, and, in fact, maybe not the whole three, because if you did the exploratory par~, the early part, and found it's not there, we wouldn't do the other 200,000. In essence, what we're saying is that even though some work has been done off Naples beach even though it didn't reveal what you wanted to see, we felt there was enough indication here in the work that was done on Captiva and the shape of your offshore shoals to warrant maybe some further looking. Yes, Jon? DR. STAIGER: Presumably if you were looking off Naples, you would investigate initial seismic methods. MR. CAMPBELL: Right. DR. STAIGER: And if you elaborated a reasonably thick area that appeared to be sand, then you go in with the coring and find it. MR. CAMPBELL: That is correct. You star~ cheap. DR. STAIGER: So if you don't find -- if you find that those hills are actually veneers of sand over something a lot harder, then you're not --. MR. CAMPBELL: You stop doing it. In fact, Jeff was going to share with you just briefly after I was finished, you know, the method we -- we have locked in after the Captiva work, if you wanted to see that. But I just wanted to show you this was the work done by CEC. There's nothing wrong with the CEC work. There was very high likelihood that the sand and the solution pits that they actually put their fiber cores in would have yielded a good material. It turned out that the area off of Naples did not show that those areas in the depressions in the rock was good materials, so they locked in on Cape Romano shoals, which was appropriate.. But what was not looked at in -- based on Captiva findings, these offshore sand hills or mounds that we found in Captiva, you can see in this picture here the same mound exists there, but there was no fiber cores placed or sampling in that area, because they~were basically looking for these depressions in the rock or the sand. And there was a good chance that there was going to be sand there but it just didn't pay off. So what Page 26 April 5, 2002 1 we're saying is that it's probably good to kind of plan to look at these in more detail and -- to look at them in kind of a sequence so you're not spending high amounts of dollars early in the project. Now, this is the area that we -- this is the Tom's Hill area. This is the signature that we got from this densified bathymetry. You can see what it looks like. And then here's the area off of -- off of Naples. And you can see it has very similar signature from that densified bathymetry. We think that looking along those hills would be beneficial here. Now, some of the barrow areas that were used in the early projects were in portions of these but not necessarily dead center on the hill; and, therefore, you know, setting them up as possibly hopper dredging as opposed to cutter-head dredging might be beneficial to the program. So we're suggesting that when you make application to the DEP and others, you tell them that you're probably going to spend a higher amount. You could always back off of that if you wanted to. I know you have to make a request to the TDC also for some dollars coming up. I wanted to let you know there's some reason to look at the various areas. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Would you point out, if -- if it's either on the screen or on this map where -- where the sand came from in our '95 --. MR. CAMPBELL: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- '96 project that we've had so much misgiving about. MR. CAMPBELL: Yeah. It came from, I believe, in this -- in this area fight here. So it was one of those areas, but I don't believe it was -- followed the hill totally. I believe it was, like, fight in this cell right here; is that correct? MR. KEEHN: It's marked on this map here. So there's a little red block fight here that was barrow Area 6, and then there's A, B, and C fight out here. And you can see that here's Naples. Here are these three areas here. And this is like we said before, the 9-mile line. So you can see that they're -- they're out there in the range of 5 or 6 miles. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So your best guesses at this point are farther out from the coast. MR. CAMPBELL: Some are farther out, but some are in the same vicinity but maybe transferred over a thousand feet or something. MR. KEEHN: And I think we're also trying to look at the sand in a different way. As opposed to deep and narrow, we're trying to look for something thin and long, slightly -- a slightly different model that we're looking for. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I was going to say, again not from an engineering standpoint, this is -- if the sand source is such that you might hope it would be, it's hopper territory. 4. MR. CAMPBELL: That's correct. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Because I think -- I don't know. The state might Page 27 actually require it. I really don't know. But I think from a practical standpoint, the community is going to demand the hopper method if it accepts dredging at all so that we filter the rocks before they land on the beach. MR. CAMPBELL: That's correct. Ron. MR. HOVELL: Mr. Chairman, that's pretty much the exact direction I gave to Steve. He kept telling me we might find stuff in close. I said, "Steve, I can't imagine this county will ever again let somebody pump an unknown entity on our beach." If hopper dredge allows you to both screen it and see what you're getting before it shows up on the beach, that's what we want. And so if a hopper dredge only becomes economical if you go out at least 5 miles, then I don't care what's within 5 miles because I can't imagine the county ever going there again. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think that's a starting point. And depending on the volume of the project that you have, you have trucking; you have groins; we've got the sand web thing going on; we have those other alternatives. But for dredging to even be in the game, I think it needs to be hopper dredging. MR. CAMPBELL: And I think it's important early on -- and this is something being done throughout the state and would be helpful in your county -- is put all the information that's ever been done in a GIS format so you have it at your fingertips, no lost information from all the previous investigations, and then you build on that to see what can be used, where we really know there is or isn't sand and then come up with some good sources. Jeff, do you have just a brief discussion of the type of investigation that could be done and kind of in stages so we would know right away where the sand is? MR. ANDREWS: I'm Jeff Andrews. This is the area off Captiva Island, and Jeff mentioned doing seismic first. We do a step before that seismic. What we do is we go out and do some bathymetries. And we identify the hills not only with the NOAH charts but also with bathymetries itself. The very fzrst thing we do is go locate all the existing wrecks, hard bottoms, and artificial reefs because you don't need to go there in the first place; then we look at all the historical data, as Tom was saying, that is now being put into a GIS database. That would be beneficial for future work also. Then we go -- in this particular case we identify all the Holocene sand ridges. And in this case it was about 20 sand ridges that we saw. The Tom's hills are these outer ones here, but we looked at all these hills. We did that with -- by first doing a bathymetry. So we went out and actually ran the boat across these hills because this NOAH data is at about a thousand -foot spacing so you see hills here but they may not be actually where they show. So actually the fact that we show that there's a foyer on a hill, it may not really be there because the NOAH data is not exactly -- it gives you a good indication where it's at. ~ So when you go out and do the bathymetry, this is across Tom's Hill. You can see it's about a 20-foot hill. It goes from 30 feet to 50 feet. That's a real huge hill. So we get Page 28 April 5, 2002 this bathymetry. Instead of getting it if we go up this day, we might ac y take a jet probe or a location out here. But by doing this bathymetry first running across these hills and actually locating truly where they are, we can go out and set up a set of jet probes on these hills. And that's what this is. We went through that bathymetry, and we locate all these hills, and we sat up a preplan exactly where we're going to put the jet probes so we get the peaks of the hills. We get the most information from that -- from the data. Now, a jet probe is a -- we have a pump that pumps water from the ocean through a pipe. You take that pipe, and you jet it into the bottom. You see the diver here going down. They're going to stand it up and actually penetrate it into the bottom. And you get information from that probe as it goes in because you can fill shell; you can fill rock; you can actually fill different materials. So you actually get an idea of what's there before you -- or as you're doing it. As you can see, there's a little bit of sand puffing up around there. You're going to wash out some material. We take back that material and analyze it so we have an idea what that material is. So by doing this, we actually locate the hill. We found out how thick it is, and we get material from that hill. So it's a quick and easy way before we actually go out. Now, with that we'll go through and plan our -- there it is. With that information, we'll go back and look at all the information that -- that those jet probes told us. In this case the red hills were high in silt; the yellow hills had fine sand, finer than the Naples beach. The lighter green sands were usable. They were compatible if you had to use them, but there were some areas that were extremely compatible with the native beach, and we identified those here. And we took this information and the samples to the -- to the erosion prevention district, and we showed them a different type of sand material that was out there, some fine sand. There's shelly material, so you can actually see what these hills are. And with that information, the erosion prevention district actually selected these three hills. They looked at the bags and said we want these three hills searched further. So we eliminated -- out of 20 of them we came down to just 3 hills. We do the actual -- which is the site work and the site scan. So we lay down our seismic lines. Went out there and we ran seismic -- this is a cherub subbottom profiler, and that's a real good record of the bottom;~ and it's great for locating these hills. Again, this is that same record. So you can see that this is the surficial sand. You have the sea floor here which has probably got some hard bottom in there, and then you've got the sand deposit. You can see the subbottom below. Of course, at the same time we're running side scan, which actually looks out and actually tells you what's on the bottom so you can map your reef so you're not near any hard bottom areas. This is a mosaic that's been put together. We're starting to do that witNmaps that we produced now. Instead of just getting a sketch where you have hard bottom, we can actually produce these mosaics. This is an island off of Broward County. Page 29 April 5, 2002 16J 1 These are pieces of the dredge that was done offshore. This is onsite. So you get a lot of detail out of the site scan. That goes into the GIS. That's another thing to click on and look at and have in digital format. We then go out to these areas. As Ron was saying, we don't necessarily continue working with -- if the area is bad. So even with the 'vi reports, after we done the site area, we take two reconnaisse vibracore or so in each area. I'm sure you're familiar what a vibracore is. It's a steel probe operated into the sediment. When they bring the tube out, they take and -- this is pulling the plastic tube out of the core here. We look at those cores as we pull them out, and we actually do more than just look at either end. We actually split them apart. Some of what you see these cores here, and we look at them on the boat. So we're actually looking at the sand on the boat, not waiting until we get back to the office after we take 50 cores and say, well, what do we got. We look at it; we know. So we can actually stop the process at any point if we're not finding sand, and then we go back. Once we agree the sand -- this is good, we go ahead and take the rest of the cores. And this is what we found in the final process. We actually came up with these barrow areas for -- within those original areas, and we found them 3 million in this one, 3 million here, 15 million. This is the sand that Captiva has. That's why Tom's hills is not so important. They ensure because Tom's hills is out here. So they have plenty of sand for their upcoming projects. And Tom's always emphasized that the more cores that we get within the barrow area the more successful the project is. By our process we actually get most of our cores in the barrow area. Although we're not looking out -- MR. CAMPBELL: If any sand investigations around the state, they might wind up with one or two cores in our barrow area. Our cores really define the entire barrow area. Most of -- our investigation, you know, the expense of part of the investigation is the vibracore, and we'll have multiple cores in our barrow areas as opposed to winding up with one or two as most investigations do. So that gives you a higher degree of reliability of the type of material. MR. ANDREWS: This one only has two outside because we got outside -- DR. STAIGER: I think that's the problem that we have with the beach restoration project is the actual number of vibracores that were in the barrow areas was far less than the number --. MR..CAMPBELL: You take -- uh-huh, because you run out of money if you don't get it in a sequential way. You try to put the cores everywhere. You wind up with most of them not getting sand, where if you did the probe, you decide in a sequential matter that you get most of -- ,. DR. STAIGER: In that case there was political pressure to sample with a clam bucket. Page 30 April 5, 2002 l_6J 1 MR. CAMPBELL: Clam bucket, yeah. DR. STAIGER: Which is, in my estimation, a waste of time. · . MR. CAMPBELL: Uh-huh. DR. STAIGER: But it was politically correct to do it. MR. CAMPBELL: Right. DR. STAIGER: You dig a hole, and the sand sloughs in from the surface. You dig three, four buckets; all you're getting is more and more stuff sloughing to the surface. You're not really getting any depth penetration, but you get some nice samples. The -- yeah, the jet probing is -- is basically a qualitative --. MR. CAMPBELL: That's correct. MR. ANDREWS: It's equal task. DR. STAIGER: You can't quantify what you're dealing -- you're looking at the stuff that comes up outside of the pipe, and you can tell what it is, but you're not -- MR. ANDREWS: You can eliminate areas. It's really great for Eliminating areas. You can tell if something's bad, but if it's good, that's when you want -- . MR. CAMPBELL: Eliminate areas, and you develop your boundaries better as to where you really want to hit the cores. You know, unless you have those jet probe, you don't know where the boundaries -- where it thins out, the mud, the rocks, whatever. You do a lot of probes and then know where your boundaries are very well, and the seismic helps. MR. ANDREWS: The seismic is concentrated in the areas where you have good sand; you don't need a reconnaisse of a huge area. MR. CAMPBELL: Right. DR. STAIGER: You get-- . MR. CAMPBELL: University of -- is it University South Florida? MR. ANDREWS: Right. MR. CAMPBELL: -- in conjunction with NOAH did some work off of Longboat Key and Manatee County and came back and said there was no sand in that area. They actually reported it before we got to the conference one time. And our -- do you remember that, that presentation? We got up, the next presentation, and said we had found, like, 33 million cube yards of sand in the same area, and we used their data. So, in essence, it's a matter of how you look at the data. Their data was fine; they did a good job. But they set a -- they set a criteria that they needed at least 10 feet of sand. And actually as a hopper dredge all you need is 3 feet of sand. So they -- they eliminated all of the hills that we went back in and explored and used and ultimately used very successfully on the beach. So in essence, it's a matter of how you look at the area. If you look at it with probes and the sequence we're talking about, it really yields a lot of good information. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Roellig has a question. Page 31 April 5, 2002 16J 1 MR. ROELLIG: What is the depth? MR. CAMPBELL: Anywhere from 30 feet deep -- 30 feet deep to about 50 foot, in that range. MR. ROELLIG: And what's approximate depth for hopper dredge? MR. CAMPBELL: Approximate depth for hopper dredge goes down to 85 feet. Yeah, in fact, they love -- when we send them the stuff on Tom's Hill, they got real excited about it saying that's the ideal depth. You'll get bids from every -- all three, four dredgers that have hopper dredges because it's just an ideal depth. It has the right length, grain size, very little shallow --. MR. ROELLIG: That was 80-foot depth you said? MR. CAMPBELL: No. That was -- Tom's Hill was 45 feet? MR. ANDREWS: It ranges from 30 at the top to 50 off the hills. MR. CAMPBELL: Yeah. So the top of the hill's 30 and 50, or ambient depth is 50. So if you locate them, they're where they're going to be, you know, 20 years from now or 30 years from now. DR. STAIGER: Basically the tops of sand ridges that were deposited when sea level was a lot lower. MR. CAMPBELL: That's right. DR. STAIGER: You've got a high area on the north end of Key Island that's just like that. And the coastal ridge of Naples, that's basically a ridge of sand, and it's beautiful stuff. MR. CAMPBELL: Yeah. DR. STAIGER: When you don't put sod over it, it's lovely. But that's what it is. I mean, the sea level was lower. MR. CAMPBELL: Right. DR. STAIGER: Those were beach-created beaches. MR. CAMPBELL: But these are almost as big as Captiva Island itself. That's how big those ridges are. And it probably was around that island that got flooded by rapidly rising sea level. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: In cubic yards how big is that source, as an estimate? '~ MR. CAMPBELL: Forty-six million cubic yards. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And you just said it's basically stationary? MR. CAMPBELL: Yeah. It's basically -- it's there for you as a great backup, or you can use it -- you can't use it tomorrow because it doesn't have enough cores in it. We'd have to do some cores and maybe some seismic over it to develop it. But if you decide, let's say, if you didn't want to go offshore in Naples and look at those mounds, you.svould go directly to that shoal; I think it's usable. It's probably better than trucking, but you don't have the problems associated with trucking, and you might get more Page 32 April 5, 2002 16J 1 competitive. We were very conservative in our estimates. Some of the contractors said they would bid less on that. I would take that with a grain of salt because contractors want you to move forward in your planning so we always round up so you have more dollars available to do it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: In essence, that's an infinite source. MR. CAMPBELL: Yeah. That's an infinite source. The question is do you want to commit money to find similar sources right off of Naples beach. The pattern looks good. I don't know whether the board felt, well, heck, I don't want to go down that road again. Then you go to Tom's Hill or someplace else. But I think there's enough indication in what we're finding in a preliminary sense -- granted, we've only looked at this for a couple of weeks. In a preliminary sense it looks like it would be good if you have the investigative money available to you to locate a source directly off your shore, you know, and we can do some preliminary work maybe this summer. Let's say we were doing the work for Hideaway Beach; we can do auxiliary work to investigate the shoals with probes. MR. STRAPPONI: What's the estimate for that preliminary work, the estimate ? MR. CAMPBELL: I think it was, like, $45,000, something in that range for the field work. And it was $30,000 to pull it altogether. And that original 30 was part of -- part of -- regardless, because you did the investigative work on top of it, and it would add to 45. MR. PIRES: Are there any other counties along this area that within, say, that 40- nautical-mile range north of Lee County or Charlotte County they're looking at potential sand that may to want look at that source? MR. CAMPBELL: Yes. And, you know, actually there's so much sand in it that it could serve multiple counties. The dredgers were looking at the same thing, stake a claim on it and sell it. But, yes, there are people looking for sand but that I think if they follow the procedures that we're doing, they'll find sand closer to them, and that's kind of economically more viable for a While. I think Captiva's happy with the amount of sand they found in all of the shoals nearby. I was trying to convince them that, well, this sand has some aspects to it, a little bit lighter than what you normally find offshore. It doesn't have any really shallow rock. MR. KEEHN: And I think Fort Myers Beach and Bonita have enough sand for probably a decade in this area right here. They already have a backup barrow area. This area is a little bit too far so they had to put some intermediate areas before they get all the way out here. At least for the next decade they might be taking care of that in the immediate vicinity. It's not the greatest sand in the world, but it's available. MR. CAMPBELL: Do you have those bags? -~ MR. ANDREWS: Yes. MR. KEEHN: They're actually planning on doing a project here this summer, Page 33 April $, 2002 16J 1 Fort Myers Beach and probably Bonita next year, if I'm not mistaken. MR. STRAPPONI: Mr. Chairman, I -- I think -- I certainly appreciate this overview you've given us of this source, and I think it's nice to know that -- the potential for 40 million cubic yards of sand exists within 30 miles and to keep that in our back pocket. But for fifty or eighty thousand of preliminary investigation, I'd like to see us look for sand in our backyard. MR. CAMPBELL: Yeah. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions or comments? Mr. Staiger? DR. STAIGER: When we did the project before, we offioaded from scows with a second dredge. If you use a hopper dredge, I mean, then we had all the heavy equipment spreading it out on the beach. MR. CAMPBELL: Right. DR. STAIGER: When you use a hopper dredge, what's the procedure to get the sand from the hopper dredge to the beach? You still need the equipment. MR. CAMPBELL: Right. You need the equipment to move it. It's a similar pumpout facility. There's a new methodology that might apply here depending on what hard bottoms you have. It's a little more efficient, and they use hopper dredges that have bottom-dump capabilities. I don't know if you've seen those presentations. But if you could find an area about 30 feet deep with no hard bottom, you can do a very efficient hopper dredging, bottom dump to an area, build it up about 10 feet; then you cutter head that prime material right up onto the beach. And the advantage there is you're out -- you don't have to worry about turtle season on the hopper dredging because you're not going up on the beach. And the cutter heads can move that material directly to the beach with a -- you know, a -- a direct pump which is a lot faster, but there's a lot of feasibility aspects. The more probable way, the way it's generally done, is a booster type of buoy that sits near the -- near the beach and pumps out the hopper onto the beach, similar to what was done before. But the sand in the hopper is more -- more of a known quantity. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Pennington, you've been down this road before. Do you have any questions or observations? MR. PENNINGTON: Similar to what Jon was asking, I was wondering what distance offshore. We're very shallow and for that 20 feet required for the hopper dredge, going to have to go out at least a mile. That's within the pumping range? MR. CAMPBELL: Yes. They can pump it in within that -- within that range. What that might determine is how many times you have to come to shore. So, in essence, if they're already pushing a mile to get to shore, when they split their pipe, it could only go either way, maybe a mile, a mile. Then you have to do more land, looking for land. MR. PENNINGTON: Uh-huh, okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Snediker. Page 34 MR. SNEDIKER: The area just south of Keewaydin Island, the development there, is there more you're -- to your knowledge, that you have at this point, and how feasible and how would that be used? MR. CAMPBELL: South of Key Island? MR. SNEDIKER: Yeah. MR. CAMPBELL: In here? MR. STRAPPONI: Sorry. MR. KEEHN: We haven't gotten all the data on this one yet. There is some additional sand added that was taken by CDC, and we do not have copies of that yet. But looking at the shoals, how it's laid out, from the Moore's report about a year ago, the potential appears to be very high that there's good quality sand there. I think our reports were that it is coarse sand, but we don't have any direct evidence within our grasp right now to tell us that. And we have that on our list of material that we need to collect on that information. So -- and I think that's kind of what we were talking about the first phase of this whole thing was to -- MR. STRAPPONI: Excuse me. MR. KEEHN: I think the first phase that I know I talked to Ron about was to collect all the information that's available right now and put it in an organized fashion so we know where the high probability areas are and the low probability areas are based upon existing information. We have only introduced some of that information today that we've collected in the last couple weeks. But there's more information out there that we still have coming to us from Alpine Seismic Survey and other companies and resources that we need to look at. MR. CAMPBELL: We've been working really the last couple weeks and really kind of answered your questions. What is the range of offshore investigation that would be reasonable? We're really not under a specific contract yet to do any -- any evaluation or -- or volumometric calculations, although we hope to be. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Roellig. MR. ROELLIG: Yes. I have another question. A thousand dollar figure was (unintelligible). CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: The question is the 600,000 we're considering, is that projected for one year or over several years? MR. CAMPBELL: It could go over several years. We were looking at it as a number to -- to fully explore the sands resources that you had. So if you -- you could budget it over a couple of years or do it, you know, whatever, it would be your preference. MR. ROELLIG: Just as a general philosophy that we would want to budget it moro or less year by year rather than set aside a large amount of money, 600,000 or a million over some undetermined period of years. Page 35 April 5, 2002 16J 1 MR. CAMPBELL: I would think that -- you know, we need to talk to Ron about what makes sense in the first year. Hideaway Beach is probably going to be going first in terms .of a sand search. I think what would make sense is to tag on something that Hideaway sand investigation if you guys felt that was a good idea to maybe do some preliminary work off of Naples shore to do some probes and to see if those sand hills have some promise. Then you would note for the next year whether to do further investigations or not. MR. SNEDIKER: I think what we have in our budget, 600,000, at least we're looking for in this year, this year which is concluding in several months. Am I correct on that? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Really it's a -- in a budget sense it's for this year. But in a more practical sense we're talking for next year. But then if we approve it, Mr. Hovell will go to the commission and try to get a budget amendment so we don't have to wait around for six months to get started. Is that correct? MR. HOVELL: That's correct. And -- and, you know, my point of view was to get the total cost and put it in as a grant application. And if it took a year or a year and a half, you know, the money sits in the bank. I mean, I just did -- looked at the cash as of 1 April. We have -- we're now approaching $17 million in the bank. It -- me personally, it doesn't concern me in trying to break it down how much do we budget this year, how much do we budget next year. We'll spend it. I would like to proceed expeditiously because, as Tom has pointed out, we have the Hideaway Beach that we're saying we want to renourish. Although we haven't settled on an exact date two or three or four years from now, we want to do the major renourishment. And the sooner we get started, you know, and work through the process sequentially, if that takes six months or that takes a year and a half, I want to get started and work through it. Now, there are phases in it, and at each phase point, because this is a contractual agreement with the state to cost share, each phase requires that the information not only come to us and you'll get a chance to review it, but it also goes to the state and they get a chance to review it and comment before you take the next step. And I guess I'll use -- since I'm already talking, I'll use this as my opportunity to give my advertisement. I got to hear a lot of this six months ago and talk to the state and got their opinion on who had the best capability to do sand searches and what not. And I had no problem, you know, after heating all the input on settling on between the three firms. We have certainly, if not probably, every firm you could name of Coastal Planning and Engineering being our sand search contractor. And the state being willing to cost share also feels much more comfortable when we say, well, we're going to go to that particular company; they feel more comfortable saying, okay, then when we participate, we know -- we have a feeling of what we're going to get. Now, one of the things that makes this -- and I forget how this worked into their Page 36 April 5, 2002 1 budget estimate. But one of the things that will make this more expensive perhaps than other previous attempts is the state is imposing what may be in another year or two the county would have thought to impose which is the requirement that they alluded to before, to put all of this stuff on a geographic information system so that it's readily available for them next time, as opposed to the way we've always done things in the past, where you get reams of data and five, ten years later everybody sits around let's start with this blank piece of paper and go engineer something. We need to make a historical file and so the state when they reviewed the draft of the scope of work for this, that was a large part of what they mandated was that all that geographic information system, according to the way the state keeps that information, has to be done in the state format. So, you know, that kind of thing is built into this budget as well. So -- and the other thing is, you know, when ! turn in a grant application, I always have to turn it in for a hundred percent of the cost. But as I just mentioned, we have a contract already with the state to cost share with this and that -- when we get to the 10- year plan part when you look down in the reimbursement section, you know, I didn't attribute to which project what money was for. But this is one of them the state is going to pay 50 percent up to a cap anyway that they're going to cost share so -- MR. STt~kPPONI: Ron, are you looking for this committee to take any action on this today, and if so, exactly what? MR. HOVELL: This was a grant application that was continued from last meeting. MR. STRAPPONI: I thought -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: No. It was continued because I for myself at least feel this presentation has been really valuable. It was continued because it was a big dollar amount, and I don't think we felt that we knew what we were voting on. I think today we can say we know what we're voting on. Mr. Pennington, you had your hand up. MR. PENNINGTON: Ron Pennington for the record. On Hideaway Beach, as I recall, the same source for Marco renourishment previously, was that which was down off the south end of Key Island, down in that area. We looked at that eagerly when we were going to do the Naples beach. And at that time the Marco Beach committee threatened to take legal action against us if we pursued it, and we backed off. But I would suspect that that would be a source to be considered for Hideaway. MR. CAMPBELL: It can be. It would -- you know, also political considerations up and down the state, there's another -- almost exactly the same type of situation up in -- in Siesta Key or the Venice project. You know, there was a political stop on looking at certain sands. Until today they represent a very good quality sand that can't be looked at. So we can't solve the political problems --. MR. PENNINGTON: Hideaway is in Marco. To me that might be acceptable to Page 37 April $, 2002 Marco people· MR. CAMPBELL: Yeah· zone sounds like it's reasonable· 160 1 I think limited use in the Hideaway area of sand in that We could look into the availability and size of the shoals and whether they could be revisited. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Snediker. MR. SNEDIKER: I'm chairman of the Marco Island Beach Advisory Committee and also chairman of the Hideaway Beach Committee. We are consumers. There will be no political problems, I can assure you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Roellig. MR. ROELLIG: As I understand it, now, we're talking about 600,000 and potentially 300,000 to be reimbursed; is that correct? MR. HOVELL: I didn't bring the state contract with me. It could be, but they may have said they'd only -- up to a maximum of a hundred thousand. I don't remember what they said, but conceptually they agreed to the 50 percent, but they had a total budget figure in mind, too, so I forget how this particular one faired in that process. MR. ROELLIG: How does this sequence in with the proposed Naples renourishment? Is that -- are we still looking at 2006 or --. MR. HOVELL: Well, I think, you know, this would be on the critical path to doing it at whatever point you want to do it. And so to me, starting now, when we get to the point of being close to, say, we have a sand source, we want to get it permitted, you know, we could choose. Do we want to start the permitting process at that time, or do we want to wait? And my recommendation when we eventually get there will be let's keep going because I think there's a lot of issues. I don't want to bore you with all the details, but there's a lot of issues about easements and the politics around here and everything else. And I don't know how it works with the easements, but I do know they all expire on December 31 st, 2005. And if there is an opportunity to do this project or this potential project under the existing easements, I think we ought to go there because there are some adjacent property owners on Naples who I don't think will sign again in the future. So we ought to get our one last look in before that opportunity goes away, if it's even allowable under the easement. I haven't done all that research yet. MR. ROELLIG: So basically the time frame I see here is we start fairly soon, will be maybe 2000 and -- maybe 2003, have a sand source. Then you have to get the permit. MR. HOVELL: Yeah. MR. ROELLIG: So really there is no slack between now and 2005, if you look MR. HOVELL: I would -- I would propose that -- and we don't really have to decide this today, but I would propose as a goal we look at trying to do this in the winter of 2004 and 2005 because if we wait to start on November of 2005, we only have two Page 38 months. Then the easements expire unless we go through some process and get everybody to agree. Again, I'm not sure the easements are good for a new project, but assuming they are, say let's get on with this while the getting's good. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Pires. MR. PIRES: Just one quick question for clarification. I guess the grant writing of the application, is there a potential for an alternative matching funding source, and the answer was indicated as being no. That's different than, I take it, from the 50/50 cost sharing with state potential? I guess that could be clarified in the grant application. MR. HOVELL: I don't remember if I said it in the words. I think you said it at a previous meeting. The title of the amount and a couple of other things, except for all those questions in the middle, were what got changed on these grant applications. And all the guts of the yes-no questions tended to be the same every single grant application. MR. PIRES: So on this one the answer is no. Is there a potential for alternative matching fundings for applications that --. MR. HOVELL: It's actually not a potential. It's already to some extent in place. MR. PIRES: So that can be clarified I guess. MR. HOVELL: Yeah. MR. PIRES: Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I just want to note that I have about 20 more minutes of this meeting. Of course, you can carry on without me, but I'd like to be able to be allowed to vote on this. Do we have any more questions, comments? Mr. Strapponi. MR. STRAPPONI: Mr. Chairman, I've heard enough. I'd like to make a motion that we go ahead and approve the $600,000 grant. MR. ROELLIG: I'll second that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Roellig seconded. Did you have a separate question, Mr. Roellig? MR. ROELLIG: No, other than the fact that switch the Xs in the grant application. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We have a motion and a second. Any further questions or comments? All those in favor? (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Excellent presentation. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? None. It passes 8-0. Thank you very much. On to the 10-year plan, Mr. Hovell. MR. HOVELL: I have today's version of a draft plan which I'll hand out. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Why don't we -- why don't we take a very short Page 39 April 5, 2002 16J 1 recess while we change reporters. (A short break was held.) ~ CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We're going to call the meeting back to order, and I will note for the record that Mr. Stakich had to leave during the recess, so he has departed for the day. We are going to move onto Item 3-C which is the ten-year plan recommendation for the TDC. MR. HOVELL: Did everybody get a copy of today's version? (No response.) MR. HOVELL: Okay. We have gotten the budget guidance from the county office of management and budget, so the revenue projections for both FY '02 and next year, FY '03, are the latest and greatest projections provided by that office. There were a few changes. Let's see. It was Gordon's Pass we added in fiscal year 2008, a dredging event at Gordon's Pass, because there's concern that we won't ever again get federal money to do that. In case the question was lingering in your m/nd, the grant application we just discussed is listed as the 625,000 FY 2002. It has 625,000 under Category C, the 600,000 for this grant application we just discussed and $25,000 for the beach emergency response plan that you recommended approval on last go-around. I think those were all the big changes. Were there any questions based on the last that you saw that you wanted me to address, or do you want me to remind you -- or, actually, not all of you were necessarily at the last one. Are there any sort of procedural things you want me to revisit? MR. PIRES: Just real quick question, I guess, that you're estimating the increase be a greater amount of interest earned on the money. I think last time it was 4.9, and now they're forecasting 5.2 percent? MR. HOVELL: Well, last time they had told me approximately 5 percent, and when I say -- it's actually keying up a formula, and if you didn't have a point something at the end of it, it really looked funny, so I made it 4.9, just -- I rounded down one, and then they did come out as 5.2 percent. MR. PIRES: Thank you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions or comments? Mr. Kroeschell. " MR. KROESCHELL: A question again on the beach -- will we be able to see the letter that you will write? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think the answer is yes. We don't have a meeting scheduled before the April 15th TDC. Once I produce the letter, which I have not done yet, I don't see any reason why Mr. Bell can't distribute it. MR. KROESCHELL: Thank you. .~. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions or comments? (No response.) Page 40 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have a motion? Mr. Roellig. MR. ROELLIG: Move to approve. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Roellig moved to approve. Second anyone? MR. KROESCHELL: Second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Kroeschell seconded. All those -- MR. PIRES: I think the motion is to approve the recommendation? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Approving the ten-year plan. MR. PIRES: To TDC and the county commission? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Correct. Motion by Mr. Roellig, second by Mr. Kroeschell to approve the ten-year plan for recommendation to the TDC. All those in favor say aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Passes 7-0. Our final specific item on the agenda today is the future meeting schedule. I don't recall the precise times, but I know Mr. Hovell had -- had marked out three times where we could have regular meetings. One, I believe, is Friday afternoon, but as much as we're doing now I think that would probably be everyone's last choice. In general, there was a Monday proposal and also a Wednesday proposal. Do you remember the specifics of that, Mr. Hovell? MR. HOVELL: No. I'm sorry I don't, but I did bring -- I think I made you-all copies of that kind of thing. I printed it out again today just to see, you know, if anything had changed, but as I recall, I think you're right. It was Wednesday afternoon, Friday afternoon. Actually, we still seem to have our time slot reserved on Thursday afternoons. When we look through this schedule, we're on there, but the problem has historically been, on at least one of those -- it doesn't show up on the schedule, but I thought we were somehow bumping into the Planning Commission. MR. KROESCHELL: Oh, yes, it's on there Thursday morning. MR. PIRES: I think what happens is they have been running longer in a more detailed analysis of the various applications. MR. KROESCHELL: What I was wondering about is didn't we get this rear half of the room. We didn't have anybody in the rear half of the room. MR. HOVELL: We haven't so far, but I'm told that, you know, they've done it that way in the past and that the people in the back understand that we are the ones up front on the mike, so we probably wouldn't suffer their noise, but they'd be suffering our noise, you know, depending on which of these dates we pick. April 5, 2002 16J 1 Page 41 April 5, 2002 16J 1 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That's their problem. No. I -- I didn't bring the thing with me, and I don't know if Dr. Staiger or anyone had seen the choices. I want to say it was the fourth Wednesday. I know it was a Wednesday afternoon. Does anyone have problems with Wednesday afternoons? MR. ROELLIG: The first one. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It's either the second or the fourth because I've got issue on the first and third, so I know it's not those two. DR. STAIGER: The second Wednesday of the month is the Planning Advisory Board meeting. They don't usually go past midday, and I don't know that there's anybody in here or not. I have to go once in awhile but not routinely. MR. PIRES: The fourth Wednesday sounds like the best. DR. STAIGER: The fourth Wednesday is a good one. MR. PIRES: In the afternoons. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Why don't -- I don't think we need to vote on this. We'll just give directions. It's either the second or the fourth. Fourth would be super good. Second is good in the afternoon to secure that as our regular time to go forward. I understand it may not be starting in May but whenever we get started. MR. HOVELL: Okay. Just looking at May, neither the second nor first Wednesday in May would work, but I think longer range certainly the -- certainly one of those will, so I'll do that for the long-range schedule. Do we want to specifically look at picking a date for our next meeting, and then beyond that I'll look for our regular -- MR. SNEDIKER: Well, the projects are meeting all the time now, the TDC forthcoming. What's the need for meetings? Do we need to have meetings now for the next several months, or should we slow up because we have an awful lot of them in the winter? I'm just asking a question. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think, you know, it's over a 12-month period we may not need a meeting every month, but to the extent we don't need meetings, I'd like to sort of save that for July and August when traditionally the governmental bodies don't meet. There may be other things, but the thing on my mind that we can start'addressing in May is beach raking and to take a look at it and understand which way we want to go because we all know we've agreed to money-wise in the budget save a placeholder for beach raking, but we have significant doubts about the beach raking activities. So I would like to just start addressing that, and we might as well start in May. Mr. Roellig. MR. ROELLIG: Another thing I'd like to see, I think we should have these kind of inputs, some kind of an update on some of the outgoing projects. Might not need any action but just two sentences, but it would be good to know something about what's happening to Parker sand web, any dredging going on, where this money's being spent. Page 42 April 5, 2002 16J 1' It's nice to find out there is a problem before I read it in the paper, if that's possible. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, that's true. That's -- I think other than -- other than these last few workshops and meetings where we've been very focused on these grant applications, I think it's been a regular feature of our meetings to be updated, and we'll continue doing that. I think that's very helpful to all of us. For May we are -- we are on the schedule for the second Thursday and, obviously, we don't know if the prior occupants -- well, actually, it looks like we don't have many before us. MR. HOVELL: It's just the back half of the room apparently. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: What is TURN again? MR. HOVELL: I don't remember what they told me that acronym stands for, but - DR. STAIGER: That would be May. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It seems to me it can work. You know, they've got that divider and -- MR. HOVELL: They say they've done it before and that, you know -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: If no one has a problem with it, we'll meet again May 9th at 1:30 in the boardroom. By that time -- I think it's, frankly, a formality, but it is required for the county commission to approve Mr. Pennington, and that we expect to occur on April 23rd, right, at the board meeting? MR. HOVELL: Depending on getting the package from the city to present, yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So hopefully Mr. Pennington will be with us, and he'll have a vote on the issues of the day. That concludes our specific items on the agenda. There is no new business. We leave time at each meeting for audience participation. MS. CROMWELL: May I? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: You, being the audience. State your name and affiliation. MS. CROMWELL: Shannon Cromwell, The Conservancy of Southwest Florida. I just wanted to ask that the Conservancy be put on the agenda to discuss the beach raking project. I know you said you're probably going to wait until whenever the next meeting in May to look at that, but I would like to ask that we be put on the agenda. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And we certainly would appreciate your input. We will have -- it may extend over more than one meeting. I don't know. MS. CROMWELL: Right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It's not to say that we'll make a decision on May 9th, but we do want to get into the specifics of the issue, and we'll make sure that we have time for your input and presentation. Page 43 April 5, 2002 16J 1 MS. CROMWELL: I did write a letter which I wrote to Mr. Hovell who is going to distribute it to you, and it's in the packet, and also I talked about before the beach survey that I've been doing. That's an ongoing thing. I've also been checking the dumpsters and sifting through the dumpsters trying to see what I can find, and I've got some information pertaining to what's actually in the dumpsters and how much. I mean, I'm not, like, a biologist. It's not very scientific, but I do have that information to share also. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, that's the input we're looking for, so I will look forward to that information. MS. CROMWELL: Thank you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We have scheduled our next meeting, I guess -- that's the next item on the agenda -- May 9th, 1:30, boardroom. Do any of the members have any comments or questions? MR. PIRES: Just a brief item. I referenced before when the Barefoot Beach people were making their presentation to the engineer that there was a DSAC meeting the other day where they talked about some proposed changes to the CCSL or CCCL provisions in the county's Land Development Code based upon some indication of some activities occurring with regards to some beachfront residential communities, you know, back end of the dune systems in the coastal area. I don't know if that's an area we should be advised of or notified of the status of that because I think our mandate, so to speak, goes beyond merely the TDC funding aspects. So a lot of issues concerning the comprehensive plan and beach aspects, so I'm wondering if it's possible to ask the staff from either Barb Burgeson of Natural Resources or Alex Sulecki in the Code Enforcement section -- she does the environmental code enforcement -- what the issues are in the beach issues in North Collier. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think that would be a good suggestion. Dr. Staiger. DR. STAIGER: The new building code that is in effect in the State of Florida now requires the permitting for coastal construction activities to be handled by the local building officials, the city and the county. DEP will continue to process a certain part of the coastal construction setback line permit dictating how high a structure has to be for storm surge beneath it and that sort of thing. But Collier County has historically adopted, I think, a coastal construction setback line that's 50 feet from the mean high water line. The city line is whatever the state's coastal construction line is wherever it is. And I don't know if the county wants to mess with it, but it wouldn't hurt for the Collier County government to adopt the Florida coastal construction control line for Collier County as its coastal construction control line, and then the county would be involved in permitting stuf£ at the same line that the state is, rather than having to do all this stuff. You know, right now their line is really kind of obsolete because it's right out on the beach Page 44 April 5, 2002 16J 1 practically. Like it or not, the local building officials are going to have to be involved heavily in permitting coastal construction as of -- I think, you know, '01 March or something like that when the building code is in effect. Yes, it's March 1st. And there may be some -- a lack of awareness on the part of some of the county building department staff about that, but it's out there. And it wouldn't hurt for you-all to be, you know, in the loop on what's going on with the Land Development Code changes and the like because you don't want to end up with somebody getting a permit to do something that they shouldn't. Just a comment. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Anything else? Mr. SNEDIKER. MR. SNEDIKER: Ron, did you want to address the situation of the tardiness? You might say something about allowing these monitoring reports, keeping promises but don't see the report. Got one in there now. One of several that are past due. Am I correct? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: In reference -- I'm sorry. In reference to what? MR. SNEDIKER: I guess many different subjects, I guess. MR. HOVELL: If I could deflect that question and just hand out what I do have. MR. SNEDIKER: Okay. Maybe that solves some of it, some that are missing. MR. HOVELL: I think there are, besides this one, two others reports that Humiston & Moore owes us for -- in the way of monitoring reports, and hopefully by May 9th -- I'll tell them when that meeting is ~- we will have them. But if you could, before you leave, this is not necessarily for next meeting but, you know, as always good background stuff, the monitoring report for -- where is the title -- I'm pretty sure it's the southern end of Marco Island with the segmented breakwaters, the minutes from the March 15th meeting, -- this is saving my postage; I'm cheap -- the letter that Shannon Cromwell from the Conservancy sent, a copy for everybody, the Goodland Civic Association legal opinion, the letter from public utilities to Florida Department of Environmental Protection requesting the generic permit modification to allow the sand web system to be used in conjunction and/or separately, whatever, from trucking just to make it an option. Although, I'll tell you Mike Sole, the director, was here for the Rookery Bay beach renourishment workshop as much told me he would not approve it, but -- and a score sheet, if you will, of a list of all projects that were submitted with the recommendations. And ultimately I'll fill in the CAC recommendations and the TDC recommendations, and something like this will go to the Board of County Commissioners. So if you didn't already get one of those during one of the breaks or whatnot, please make sure you pick one up before you go. MR. PIRES: Nice deflection. Page 45 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions or comments? Thank you. The meeting is adjourned. April 5, 2002 lbJ 1 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 3:45 p.m. COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE GARY GALLEBERG, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY BARBARA A. DONOVAN, RPR, CMR AND CAROLYN J. FORD, NOTARY PUBLIC Page 46 NapLes Daily News NapLes, FL 34102 Affidavit of PubLication Naples DaiLy News 3301 TMIIAMI TRL E BLDG H NAPLES FL ~/+112 REFERENCE: 059405 #204107 5~+IZ~OB NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEE State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County/ Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier ~ounty, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously publish~.=<~ in said Collier County, Florida, each day and hm~ been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year n~xt ~r~ceding.t~ first publication of the attacheH copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person; firm or. corporation any ~c~!~t~ ~eb~te, .co~mJssion or refund for the Dur~ose'~¥'secuFing this advertisement for ~ubLiction.~n the.said newspaper. PUBL[SHED ON: AD FILED ON: Signature of Affiant Sworn to and Subscribed personal.[½ known by me ~.000 INCH 0~/~/0~ ~nna Che~ney My C~mi~n ~0~3~ ~Pims ~r 11.2~5 16J March 15, 2002 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE co LA=VI O YCOMM 16J NAPLES, FLORIDA, MARCH 15, 2002 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:30 p.m. In REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: VICE CHAIRMAN: Gary Galleberg David Roellig James L. Snediker Robert B. Stakich William Kroeschell Anthony P. Pires Ashley D. Lupo NOT PRESENT: John P. Strapponi ALSO PRESENT: Ron Hovell, Public Utilities, Coastal Projects Manager Roy B. Anderson, Public Utilities, Director of Engineering Jon Staiger, Ph.D., City of Naples Natural Resources Dir. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Welcome to the March 15, 2002, meeting of the Coastal Advisory Committee. I will note for the record that we have in attendance Mr. Kroeschell, Ms. Lupo, Mr. Pi_res, Mr. Snediker, and Mr. Stakich. Mr. Strapponi's absent, and I believe we expect Mr. Roellig to be here a little bit later. Are there any additions to the agenda? MR. HOVELL: I placed a package in front of each of your seats that includes the latest and greatest ten-year plan as well as three additional grant applications, but since the agenda just says "grant applications" in general, I don't think there's any additions. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Old business, Item 3-A, we have the minutes from January 11, 2002. Are there any changes or corrections? Page 1 March 15, 2002 (No response.) 1 6 t.,! 1 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: If not, we will --. MR. HOVELL: Mr. Chairman, I apologize. I didn't double-check with the folks across the hall that we're being taped, etc. REPORTER: I'm not sure we're on the microphones. MR. HOVELL: And we're not on the microphones, I just noticed. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I will then summarize just in case we need to summarize. We took a roll; we have a quorum, and we're missing Mr. Strapponi and Mr. Roellig. There were no additions to the business, and we had moved on to old business, Item 3-A. We have the minutes from January 1 lth, 2002, for approval, and I was at that time asking if anyone has any changes to the minutes. MR. PIRES: Move to approve. MR. KROESCHELL: Second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We have a motion and a second. All in favor? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Aye. MR. SNEDIKER: Aye. MR. STAKICH: Aye. MR. KROESCHELL: Aye. MR. PIRES: Aye. MS. LUPO: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Passes unanimously. Item 3-B, the rock removal plan for Naples and Vanderbilt Beach. MR. HOVELL: We received a letter of approval dated March 7th from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection basically giving -- they did make some changes to the last version of the plan, but we, the county, I believe, feel that they are minor enough that we'll accept those. And, in fact, we started the engineering testing on Naples Beach on Wednesday, March 13th. We're doing about -- approximately 20 to 30 trenches across the beach to have them sifted for percent shell and percent rock content. So that part's already begun, and we're also working toward bringing in the sand-sifting machines. For the Vanderbilt section, the requirement is that we just go ahead and sift from south of the Ritz to about a quarter mile north of La Playa. For Naples the requirement is that we test and determine where the rocks are and, then, based on those results, we'll sift the appropriate areas. As of this morning, I was able to talk to the contractor, and we're going to go ,ahead and bring in two machines so that we can do the two beaches more or less simultaneously in an effort to try and get away from working the week before Easter especially. So it looks like we'll be starting on April 1 st with that effort. Page 2 00t 6 J The machines -- after some more detailed discussion with them, the machines can do more than one foot at the same time, so in order to do a greater depth, they don't have to go back and make a second pass. They can just start at a greater depth. But in or~ter to aid that what we'll probably do is starting April 1 st till those sections of beach that need to be sifted so that when the machine comes along it's all broken up and loose, and they can get through it easier. And so with that we hope that by the second or third week in April, depending on how their production rates go, that we'll be done with the rock removal, or at least the initial rock removal, and move on into the maintenance phase of the rock removal plan, which will last -- I think as I've mentioned before -- indefinitely with the life of the sand on the beach. So I think that's good news that we have the plan by the state. And the other thing that completing the testing and sifting will allow us to do is place sand on Naples Beach and Vanderbilt Beach and, at least, the way things stand right now, we're going to start on Monday, March 18th with placing the sand on Naples Beach up at Doctor's Pass, and conceptually we'll start on November 1st with Vanderbilt Beach to put some sand up there. So I think that kind of gives you a'g~neral idea of what we've done over the last couple weeks while we've been having all of our workshops and not talking about this issue as much. And maybe a year from now this will be a topic that's not so hot any more. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Good. Does anyone have any questions? MR. KROESCHELL: I have an understanding you're not going to need to get into the Naples Beach from the Moorings Beach. You're going to do everything from Lowdermilk; is that right? MR. HOVELL: Lowdermilk and Third Avenue North is our current plan. MR. KROESCHELL: So you won't need the access from Moorings Beach? MR. HOVELL: We had originally looked for multiple access points to try and make the time frame shorter. But after talking to the contractor it isn't just the number of beach access points; there's a lot of other things that go into whether or not you can get the work done more quickly --. MR. KROESCHELL: Uh-huh. MR. HOVELL: And he didn't need any more than two access points. MR. KROESCHELL: That's good, no objection. I just wanted to clarify that point. MR. HOVELL: Well, the issue -- and I don't know at this late date what, if anything, will be done, but for various reasons I think the press release just went out maybe yesterday or today. And so there are some concerns from some -- specifically from a hotel in between Lowdermilk and Moorings residents' beach about the timing of all this and couldn't we have used Moorings so as not to impact them during Easter week. MR. KROESCHELL: Oh, I see. MR. HOVELL: And I don't know if it's too late to figure ail that out or not. But I 1 Page 3 oo 16 J guess we'll give it a shot come either after this meeting or Monday morning, whichever works out. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, hopefully they can be accommodated as best as we possibly can, but we have such a limited window to do this work, but sometimes problems can't be avoided. Are there other questions? MR. SNEDIKER: Which engineer have you assigned to that? Which engineering f'Lrm is handling that? MR. HOVELL: Humiston & Moore is doing the -- you know, they did the initial design template for how the sand is to be placed, and they'll be ~doing the monitoring and the post-construction report. MR. SNEDIKER: They will. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We spoke a lot in January about this, and we were concerned about the state proposal for the plan. And I take it that the state moved more in our direction, came much closer to our original proposal? MR. HOVELL: Yes. When we -- when staff and Coastal Planning and Engineering went to Tallahassee on Febrha~y 5th, we took with us the videotape of Ozzie's Pipeline Patter, and they did -- with the new director up there who took over as of January 1st, they were much more agreeable to the way we had proposed things. And his name is Mike Sole, S-O-L-E, and he had specifically said that, you know, from his point of view that it wasn't just the beach and the wildlife but also the impact to the public. He said that all aspects had to be looked at. And he agreed that doing something that was perhaps less invasive but still got the job done was the way to go. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And we had one time been talking in terms of around $400,000 or so for the project. Do you have a handle -- I know you don't have an actual price, but do you have a handle on an estimate? MR. HOVELL: Well, again, it's kind of hard to say because Naples -- we don't know exactly where we're going to have to do it, but if things go the way they're currently headed, I would tend to say it will be somewhere between $400,000 and maybe as high as $800,000, depending on the quantity on Naples Beach. So it won't be multiple millions of dollars anyway. (Mr. Roellig joins meeting.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And this will be out of -- not out of our area's TDC, will it? It will be out of the general fund because that's where the litigation -- MR. HOVELL: No. Actually, this project is being paid for by TDC funds, and the settlement funds that were received as part of the litigation also went into TDC -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I wasn't aware that it had gone that way. MR. HOVELL: Right. ~ CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We'll note for the record that Mr. Roellig has joined US. MR. SNEDIKER: How much was the settlement fund? 1 Page 4 March 15, 2002 MR. HOVELL: It was a total of $1.3 million. 1 6J MR. SNEDIKER: I thought it was considerably more than that. MR. HOVELL: And I can't remember which firm -- one was for $500,000, and the other was for $800,000, but I don't remember which was which between the engineer and the contractor. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Item 3-C is the Naples Beach Renourishment. MR. HOVELL: Yeah, I'm sorry. I just pretty much just covered that we're going to start macking on Monday and see about changing some of the details, but unless there's any other questions on that, I guess we covered that one. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: New business, Item 4-A is the TDC grant applications. MR. HOVELL: Each of you should have received a bound package of the grant applications. In addition, I handed out in front of each of the your seats there three additional grant applications as well as the*most recent draft of the ten-year plan. And with the exception of three new ones, those grant applications that are in the bound package that I gave you are the ones that we went over at our last workshop and, you know, unless there are specific questions, as we go through each one, what I thought we can do is just refresh our memories on what each application's for. And then maybe I might suggest that on an exception basis you sort of pull any ones that you specifically want to talk about, and perhaps you could do one motion to cover all the ones that you don't have any questions on. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think that would be a good approach, but then also as part of the discussion the new ones that we haven't had an opportunity to look at, you'll describe them more fully; right? MR. HOVELL: Right, right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. HOVELL: Okay. I'll get started. Just behind the cover page you'll notice that I put in a summary page there, and I'm just going to go down that list, and starting with Wiggins Pass monitoring -- as a matter of fact, we just finished dredging within the last couple of days, so that project, as far as maintenance dredging, is done for this year. We are required to do an annual monitoring of the pass to see what future work might be required. And so that's put in for the $27,000. We have the Pelican Bay Services Division, which has requested $10,000 for Clam Pass monitoring, and I believe, as we discussed at the workshop that is not the total cost of monitoring everything in Clam Pass. That's just the portion that's related -- or the percentage of the overall monitoring that's related to the pass itself. And so that becomes a contribution toward -- of about 25 percent towards the overall monitoring costs that the Pelican Bay Service Division picks up the rest of. And that's for $10,000. Page 5 The City of Naples has turned in a grant application for Doctor's Pass monitoring. We've done that for a number of years now, and that's for $10,000. We have a countywide beach monitoring that's for Vanderbilt, Naples, and Park Shore. And this one specifically includes taking a look at the structures on the beach as well as specifically the storm water outfalls. That's for $140,000. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: How does that relate to the draft ten-year plan that we have? The first three items are easy to follow on the plan. MR. HOVELL: Yeah. The $140,000 you'll see a split between Naples at $100,000, Park Shore at $20,000, and Vanderbilt at $20,000. And that's more of a general estimate than a specific cost attributed to each one. I was just trying to break out by beach segment how much we're investing in our various beaches. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Right. Okay. MR. HOVELL: The City of Naples has turned in a grant application for some debris removal for $9,000, and perhaps when Dr. Staiger gets here we can discuss that in a little more detail. I think that's something we can handle under our current budget for that type of work, and we don't necessarily need to do that as the separate grant application for next year. The city's also turned in --. MR. ROELLIG: Is that a new item for this list? MR. SNEDIKER: Yes, it is. MR. HOVELL: Perhaps I didn't have that for the last workshop. You might be fight. Maybe it came in just in time to get into the booklet. And I would like to talk about that one when Dr. Staiger gets here, so as far as -- when we get to the -- bundling things together for recommendation, I would say that we deal with that one separately. The City of Naples turned in a grant application for South Gordon Drive T-groin monitoring and maintenance just under $100,000. And that one -- I think if you were to go over to the ten-year plan, I probably rounded that off to $100,000. And then we have Hideaway Beach T-groin monitoring --. MR. ROELLIG: Excuse me. Can I ask a question on that one? MR. HOVELL: I'm sorry, which one? MR. ROELLIG: The project monitoring. It says that a 30-month at 36-month survey, is that just for a -- it's not for a 30-month period, I presume. MR. HOVELL: I'm sorry. Are we talking about Hideaway T-groins? MR. ROELLIG: No -- MR. HOVELL: South Gordon -- MR. KROESCHELL: Naples --. MR. HOVELL: Naples T-groin. MR. ROELLIG: Humiston and Moore's estimate, they have 30 year -- I'm sorry -- 30-month monitoring and 24-month monitoring. Is that the 30 -- I don't know how -- does that run through the whole year, or does that go on for two years? Page 6 MR. HOVELL: I'm not sure I'm following your question, but perhaps we could wait till Dr. Staiger gets here. He's more familiar with --. MR. SNEDIKER: The 24-month that would be the second year, and then the 30th (inaudible) every six months. So it's the 24-month, the 30th month, and the 36th month according to the permit itself. MR. HOVELL: There is --. SNEDIKER: One monitoring for each of those periods that's required by the MR. permit. MR. HOVELL: The monitoring -- you're right. I believe the monitoring is required at 6-month intervals out till about 3 years, and then I think it becomes annual monitoring after that. And Dr. Staiger could probably confirm that the groins were installed roughly two years ago. I believe we're down to Tiger Tail Lagoon projection -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Actually, we -- I know you mentioned Hideaway. We kind of skipped over it. If I'm not missing a line item, that appears to have gone from $100,000 to 150 or is more included in that than the line item on our ten-year plan? MR. HOVELL: We had -- we prbb~ably added in the -- let me take a look. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: You might add in the -- MR. SNEDIKER: A-5. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I was going to say, right. (Overlapping dialogue) Marco Pass (overlapping dialogue). REPORTER: I'm sorry. You can't talk over one another, or I won't be able to give you a record. I don't know what your last comments were. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Snediker had pointed out Item A-5. And then I believe I said, "Yes. Those two together add up to the 150,000." MR. HOVELL: Yes. And this grant application is just for monitoring activities, and there is a contingency line item for some post-storm surveys, but it does not specifically include the maintenance. That was covered under a separate section to anticipate a question from Mr. Snediker. And so you're right. A-5 for $50,000 and C-5 for $100,000; that is this $150,000 grant application. MR. ROELLIG: On the estimate it says contingency -- like you said, for post- storm surveys, 50,000, but we've never had any other estimates or any other projects. We've never had a line -- or an amount in there for post-storm surveys as a contingency item. It seems like this is the only one that I was aware of. (Inaudible) surveys could have a contingency post-storm survey item for $50,000, but this is the only one, which seems like an anomaly. MR. HOVELL: I won't say you're wrong, and it may be something that we want to take a look at just making the recommendation that we not approve that particular line item and make this grant application, in essence, approved for $100,000. I mean, there's other ways to handling contingencies as opposed to budgeting in each project. Page 7 case. MR. ROELLIG: Okay. MR. HOVELL: 1 We're not being consistent with the contingencies if that's the The next one is for the Tiger Tail Lagoon projection, and that~'s the one where we're looking to get some type of professional guesstimate -- for lack of a better word -- of what we think the future of Sand Dollar Island and Tiger Tail Lagoon would be so that between parks and recs and the other effected interests we can make a plan for how best to -- you know, either put in boardwalks or try to think up other things to do in that area to make it a more beachfront friendly area, I guess would be the way to put it. MR. SNEDIKER: Can I interject one item here that's sqmewhat important? Because the parks and recreation are going to be looking at the boardwalk and engineering for that, if we could put this soon on the agenda after the budget year starts so that study can get completed on the Lagoon and Sand Dollar Island projection as soon as possible to give to parks and recreation so their engineers will have that information. Because with that information they may want to move that boardwalk a little bit one way or the other or shorter or longer or something. MR. HOVELL: Right. Okay. The next one is the Marco Island Beach monitoring, and actually this one -- you know, there are sort of three very related monitoring activities in that area, and they are all three listed here in a row: the beach itself, the segmented breakwater, and Caxambas Pass. And that's for 22,000 for the beach, 20,000 for the segmented breakwater, and 20,000 for Caxambas Pass. Then the next one we move to would be what I call "annual beach renourishment." That's where we've -- at least in the last year or two put in the 50,000 cubic yards or a million dollars to renourish whatever beach hot spot develops, and that's the one that this year we supplemented due to Tropical Storm Gabrielle. MR. ROELLIG: Which one are you on now? MR. HOVELL: That's the million-dollar annual beach renourishment one. MR. ROELLIG: Oh, okay. Is there some reason that the -- I hate to keep jumping back at you (inaud/ble). MR. HOVELL: I'm sorry. MR. ROELLIG: Caxambas Pass monitoring is 20,000, and Doctor's Pass is 10,000. Is there any -- is it that more difficult to monitor? Do you have any backup on that? MR. HOVELL: Well, I know where I got my estimate from. I don't know where the city got theirs from. I can pretty much guarantee it's two different engineers, and without looking at the number of survey lines or what have you, it's hard to say. And, also, I'm not sure that mine is necessarily very well broken out between the beach and the breakwater and the pass. I've tried to bundle them together since they are all so closely related, and I believe -- I'd have to go back and look, but I believe the initial feedback I got was sort of a one total estimate, not necessarily broken down by those 1 Page 8 three. That was just something I was trying to do to spread the costs out per the types of things we were looking at. So I guess to answer your question, I'm not sure the 20,000 necessarily reflec~just monitoring Caxambas Pass as opposed to an attempt to divvy up the costs. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions? MR. HOVELL: Are we ready to move past the million-dollar project? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: No. I have one question on that if no one else does. We have discussed on trying to get renewable permits or rolling permits -- whatever that phrase is -- for all areas of the beach in the future, and we don't have that nOW. MR. HOVELL: You mean beyond the project limits? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We have in the -- and the terminology escapes me, but we have permits, the same permit we use for Park Shore which said you can put 50,000 cubic yards here. And we cover various parts of the beaches with permits like that. And one of the issues we discussed is to have permits like that in place for the entire beach so that when renourishment is needed we can renourish, and we don't have to spend the whole season getting a permit br/ly to find out it's turtle season. MR. HOVELL: The current permits that we have cover Vanderbilt, Marco, Naples, Marco Island, but only within the conf'mes of the areas that have been previously renourished. So as far as extending those to cover -- you know, for instance on Park Shore, the project limits stop not too far south of Vadato Way, don't go all the way to Doctor's Pass. To include that over area is something that we plan to take on in the future should that become a hot spot so that we're not at the last minute going in for that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That would be a small part of this million-dollar allocation, wouldn't it? MR. HOVELL: Well, no. Actually, I would do that under the countywide monitoring. It's part of the overall view of the beaches on the engineering side. This particular grant application is really just to cover the costs of trucking in sand and the associated engineering to truck in the sand but not to take on those other aspects. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And the ultimate issue, of course, is just to make sure that that's going to be addressed this coming year. MR. HOVELL: Right. MR. ROELLIG: It's not mentioned specifically on one of these items, this expanded permit or permit for areas that are not currently permitted. MR. HOVELL: No. I didn't specifically list it in the grant application, you're fight. MR. PIRES: Mr. Chairman, if I may, I have one question that's sort of a continuing question I would have and maybe just for other people also, the questions for all the grant applications, they are all standard questions and getting standard responses, yes, no for all of those. And one where -- some of these I'm having difficulty with -- and Page 9 it's not really articulated. The answer is always "yes," but there's no backup for it. But I think the question is there for a reason. We didn't decide what the questions are, but the one that's throughout all these applications is (as read): "Does the proposed expenditure promote environmental awareness and understanding, and does the proposed project address environmental considerations?" I think every one of them is answered "yes," and it's not in the distinctive (sic); it's in the conjunctive sense to do both. And I'm not sure how a lot of these are being articulated as promoting environmental awareness and understanding. I'm not sure what the component is on each one of these. And, once again, it may not be a critical component of be consideration to fund a particular grant application, but with just a pat "yes" to all of these without any further detail as to any of these, once again, maybe I'm going a bit beyond what our role or task is, but I think that's an important issue. At least the -- the question is asked. There must be a reason for the question, and there's an answer but no real backup. MR. HOVELL: I hear you --. MR. PIRES: I'm wondering how these promote environmental awareness. I mean, it says fight in here (as read): "Promote'efivironmental awareness and understanding." I'm not sure if any of these really do, quite honestly. MR. HOVELL: And I had it on my list of tkings to do for next season to ask why we have this particular grant application form with all those questions because my view is, you know, that isn't the deciding factor in -- when these things get approved. But perhaps I'm wrong. And I thought I would go through one process before I can finalize that conclusion. MR. PIRES: I can appreciate that, once again, because I know we're just relying upon the staff for the recommendation on these, and I'll call them the "standard answers" to a lot of these questions. And, quite frankly, I don't see the "yes" on a lot of these. MR. ROELLIG: I concur (inaudible) a number of these where you can quibble one way or the other what an answer might be. And I don't know if you want to go through them one by one. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Those are good points, but they are probably more with the form than with the actual substance of the project because we're agreeing to the substance of the project as being within the proper realm of activities and something that's useful to the community. MR. PIRES: I agree with that and, once again, I don't have any quarrel or quibble with that. It's just that the questions is there for a reason or if not, let's get rid of the question. If there's a criteria that's being applied but not being applied. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We'll work on that for next season, I'm sure, because a lot of it does seem to be an automatic answer. We all can agree to that. , MR. HOVELL: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But then just to finish, if I may, the thought on getting permits in place countywide, I had had that question reserved for the million- 1 Page 10 dollar request. If it belongs more properly in the grant request for the monitoring of 140,000, I think on the committee we all understand that's what we want to do, and staff is going to do that. But in the -- more or less the fkst section -- the goals and object~ves - - if we could just add a phrase to that, or we'll do that in our motion at the end to note that we intend to expand the permits that are in place. Because I think -- in the operation of our beaches, I think that's one of the real critical components is having permits in place when we need them and not having to go through the rigmarole after we need them. MR. HOVELL: And I think it will be a good exercise to find out just how receptive DEP is to that kind of thinking. In my conversations with them, the answer has been not very receptive. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Oh, okay. MR. HOVELL: But at least this way we can formally submit something and get a formal response from them as opposed to me talking to them on the phone about it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Maybe that's not a reasonable hope. I was under the impression that we could hope to achieve that. But let's at least spend the next several months or whatever the appropriate tired if to try to get that done, and if we can't let's know that we can't. MR. HOVELL: If we're ready the next one is the annual sand dune and structure maintenance for $300,000. And we did increase this one from the last time you saw it. This is the one that we added the T-groins down on Hideaway Beach into the equation. And I also included some additional money for parks and rec. They have a number of walkovers and beachfront parks that they've previously not felt they had a way to -- you know, to tap into TDC funds to get those things repaired after not just major storms, but even just minor high-wind events that happens to take off the bottom step or whatever of their walkover. And they had originally added that into the beach-raking application, and I told them it was more appropriate to move it over into this one. MR. ROELLIG: Which one are you on now? MR. HOVELL: That was the dune and structure maintenance for $300,000. MR. KROESCHELL: Again, this does not state where the work is being done. This is just overall on all the beaches; is that right ? MR. HOVELL: No. I guess I can't say it's necessarily right. I would tend to say it's work on structures that public funds have put in place and that we have permits to do something with. I don't know if there are any other structures out there, but if there are we're not -- at least, at this point -- contemplating spending money on them. For instance, if there was a structure of some type or a dune, for that matter, at Barefoot Beach, the way things are currently structured, we would not go up and spend money at Barefoot Beach, nor would we go spend money at Pelican Bay Beach. MR. KROESCHELL: Okay. But it does -- it's at Lowdermilk Park, for example. MR. HOVELL: Yes. Page 11 And it's down at the -- down by the pier and south of the MR. KROESCHELL: pier and all that. But it's all of those areas that were done before. MR. HOVELL: Yes. * MR. KROESCHELL: And Vanderbilt Beach. MR. HOVELL: Yes. MR. KROESCHELL: Okay. That's what I need to know. MR. HOVELL: It's the majority of the beaches and it's certainly the main public beaches. MR. ROELLIG: Well, see this is why I have a little quibble with you. You have one here that says (inaudible) understanding of alternative technologies which may contribute to (inaudible), and you say no. I would say "yes," but you know, I'm not going to fall on a sword over it. But I think as Mr. Pires indicated, you want to watch these questions a little bit because some of the things, I think, could be answered yes. It's not a big deal because you are looking at so many difficult technologies as I understand. REPORTER: Mr. Roellig, could you pull your microphone a little closer to you? MR. ROELLIG: Sure. MR. HOVELL: The next grant application is for beach cleaning applications, and this one, I believe, has gone down since the last time you saw it, and as I just mentioned, that's because we pulled out the additional funds that they -- parks and rec had included for beach walkover maintenance, and so all the costs are strictly associated with raking the beaches, the personnel, the fuel and lubricants, the equipment cartage is moving the beach rakes on a flatbed from one beach to another. The trash disposal is the dumpsters that are at each of the beaches that we rake. MR. SNEDIKER: Regarding that subject, the City of Marco Island had their beach advisory committee meeting last Tuesday, and this was just discussed a great deal, and we've just been discussing how much -- how frequently should we clean the beaches. City of Marco Island, I guess, needs to go on record as saying that they want exactly the way it has been. And that's a little variance because sometimes it's been once a week; sometimes it's been twice a week depending on machines and so on. But they do -- the City of Marco Island does not want a reduction in that. Now, our budget includes the same things we did last year, so this does not affect our budget, but just so we're on record with that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Was that a formal action because we discussed this a lot last time, and I had the impression -- certainly we had a consensus on this committee in terms as what to recommend, although that is a consensus that can change. And perhaps you weren't speaking for Marco Island, Mr. Snediker, but I thought you were part of the consensus that said we're overdoing all of this. ~ MR. SNEDIKER: You are correct. In my personal opinion, I think we are overdoing this. But the City of Marco committee, which I am only -- I'm chairman, but I'm only a member of that -- I was overruled by that voting. I feel the same way I did last 1 Page 12 March 15, 2002 1 6 J week. I like the shells on the beach. But the other people on Marco Island apparently would prefer the more groomed beach. So now I'm speaking for the City of Marco Island. The last time I spoke for ~ myself. My personal opinion has not changed. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Even with that taken into consideration, I think this item needs some work because we had discussed and, I think, reached a consensus, though, again, not a final decision, that we don't intend it to be the same situation going forward. And for the moment we can hold Marco out of this or whatever. But just to have the broader discussion -- and we had agreed not to necessarily change the amount of money allocated to this line item but to change the activities. But that's not the way the proposal looks to me. It looks just like the same thing going forward, and I really don't want to recommend that to the commission. MR. SNEDIKER: Let me -- maybe I misspoke a little bit there. City of Marco Island is still discussing this. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. SNEDIKER: I hate to say that's a final decision because there are still some other items under consideration. But it c~dainly looks as if that's the way they want to gO. So let me rephrase the statement I made a few moments ago. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I had heard -- and I might be wrong on this because I didn't hear the tape or even if there is a tape, but on Marco Island I thought there still was something of a feeling that many areas are raked too much, and they make the beach too denuded; however, some of the resorts and hotels have an interest in having their beach cleaned because for the tourists it's sort of part of a dream or something like that. And that can be accommodated pretty simply. We don't need a big county budget line item, raking. It can be the hotel. We discussed that two weeks ago. The hotel can get out there with a little screen behind it. And I would like if a hotel wants that and it's permissible, which it is, that's the right way to go. But not to rake the whole beach just because some people want a clean beach because we'll never have 100 percent. MR. SNEDIKER: Right. MR. GALLEBERG: Somebody's always going to want the golf course look, and somebody's always going to want shells and something more natural and pristine. MR. SNEDIKER: Well, the hotels do do their own, which, you know, is a typical situation. I don't care where it is. But, again, it's the county, you know, called our beach-raking equipment, and I guess that's our decision to make. City of Marco Island may have their opinion, City of Naples may have their opinion, and other people may have theirs. But still I think it's our county -- our committee here with Ron, etc., on the staff who make the decisions to how (inaudible). Other people may or may not agree with that decision. MR. GALLEBERG: And, also, naturally it's the commissioners' decision, and if this is something that, you know, in the community they get too many calls that say this Page 13 J is not the way to go, they'll decide that accordingly. But we're supposed to make a recommendation with an eye to reality, of course, with an eye to the budget, and an eye to public opinion. ~' But, really, what's the best way to handle the beach in our opinion? And I thought we had reached a consensus that the best way was to cut down on some of the raking because it takes away all the good stuff, and there isn't that much bad stuff to be taken away. And, I mean, everyone join in the discussion if they want, but I thinkin terms of our technical representation to the commission we should be focusing on that angle and other bodies such as the commission have to focus on a different range of items, but our focus should be what's best for the beach MR. HOVELL: Mr. Chairman, I did not change this grant application other than the costs from the last time you saw it, and I just flipped back through it. You know, without knowing specifically what might be different, I'm not sure what else I would have changed other than the price. I did have it on my list of things to do that beach raking will continue to be discussed and ultimately perhaps things will or won't change, but as far as the grant application, if there's any suggestions alsofit what you'd like to see different, maybe you can include that as, you know, part of your -- you know, your motion. But I wasn't really sure what else to change really in here. MR. ROELLIG: Well, I think we should look at this alternative of perhaps once a month or once every six weeks or something of that sort if we feel that beach cleaning is necessary. There are many areas -- as we discussed last time, there are many areas that there are virtually no beach cleaning and no complaints as far as I'm concerned. I mean, you'll find little pieces of coral or other stone, but I've never heard of any really adverse comments. So in that sense if we decide to go with a much less frequent cleaning, we could recommend a lower dollar amount, I would think. MR. PIRES: And, I guess, Mr. Chairman and David along that line, I think when you look at paragraph 10, I mean, what are the benefits? It seems the primary benefits is the aesthetics, which seems to be in a sense possible that this committee says that that's not as important as the other aspect about getting rid of dead fish and other debris. So maybe a recommendation could be that if we disagree with that concept or that aspect of the grant application as to what is the benefit that should be the focus of this, if that's the sense. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We had also discussed that when we're talking about the raking -- we've recently had an incidence of red tide and the dead fish washing up -- that we're not talking about that kind of call -- that's a recurring event, of course, but let's call it an irregular event. We are really talking about the habitual raking where :what really comes up, in theory, fitter and seaweed and that type of stuff is being picked up. But if you look at what's picked up, it's not litter and seaweed. It's shells; it's coral; it's sand; you know, the occasional Pepsi bottle, that type of thing. 1 Page 14 So we aren't talking about dead fish because that presents both potentially a health hazard, I suppose, and certainly an aesthetic detriment, all would agree that raking's required in that circumstance. But just raking it every day like it's a golf course is what we're trying to discuss. And I think it developed a consensus, at least in terms of this committee, that we felt there was overraking occurring and that we should cut back on that. And we heard different public comment, and I think maybe we'll hear more now that, indeed, the excess raking, if you characterize it that way, is detrimental'to the environment, to the whole ecosystem that occurs on the beach. MS. HORTON: Lori Horton from the Conservancy of Southwest Florida. We personally would like to see no beach raking unless.there's a major event such as red tide, hurricanes, storm event, you know, the Fourth of July firework because it really does -- you know, even if you're not an environmentalist, it removes the seed sources; it reduces the integrity of the sand root; it inhibits dune formation, which is so important when a storm comes through, a hurricane comes through, the T-groins, the nets. I mean, we spend millions of dollars and lots of time -- and this committee should know -- trying to preserve the beach to accumulate sand when we have a natural way of doing it right there. And it doesn't cost mc;ney not to rake the beach. We recommend that the trash be manually picked up. That way -- even the beach- raker employees can actually pick up cigarette butts, for example, because the rakes do not get the cigarette butts. Again, I want to emphasize it does remove seed sources and scrapes the roots. And as you know several people have noticed that the beach rakes are going into the dune vegetation and into the water, and it compacts the sand which complicates things during sea turtle nesting, and it's just -- it's kind of a common sense thing to me even if you don't care about it removing organic material for the birds to feed on or -- you know, it just stabilizes the beach, and we just want you to be aware of that. And it doesn't make sense to keep continuously raking the beach and digging up the roots and digging up the plants and inhibiting the dune formations. Also, too, I noticed just in walking, people generally around here seem -- I mean, our beaches are beautiful -- seem to be pretty willing to throw away their trash and maybe the placement of more trash receptacles in more visible places. I think Maura mentioned the "Adopt a Shore Program," public education, things like that, in addition to not raking as much would definitely improve the problems that the public might have such as, you know, trash on beach, which is what the beach raking is essentially doing with the exception of red tide. But we would like to see it not be done at all with the exception of those events. Thank you. MR. KROESCHELL: Mr. Chairman, I recall the discussion last time that there was some disagreement between some of our advisors as to how frequently the beach was being raked. And I suspect the best thing to do would be to get this back into committee - - or get it back to staff and find out exactly how much raking is being done and with an eye of going in your direction, as I believe we should. You mentioned that we should do less frequent raking. 1 Page 15 March 15, 2002 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think so too. The discussion last time evolved in terms of how frequent -- the answer, I think, was basically it depends where you are on the beach because of the equipment and it being not reasonably transportable from .~' Marco, say, to Naples or North Naples. Some areas are more or less Frequent because the equipment has to cover larger areas in some cases. MR. STAKICH: I have a question. For budget purposes why don't we just leave it the way it is because we're going to go on with this subject to other meetings? I disagree with some of the thoughts here that we shouldn't -- place like Marco Island, talk about the birds feeding. There's plenty of islands around with a lot of this stuff for the birds to feed on. That small stretch that we're talking about on Marco Island, which really is the money that we take in for tourism, is for people to come here, the tourists. I think -- just personal opinion -- that the tourists really like to see the beaches clean that you call the "golf course look," rather than the rustic look. There's plenty of beaches around here if you want the rustic look. You can go down -- I happen to think that the discussion on this should be taken up further, get more opinions here. I feel that the golf course look is fine for a place like Marco Island. I don't see it's good for everybody else. Ttiaf's why I think maybe we just leave the item in the budget the way it is for now and bring up the discussion at a future date. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: As far as leaving it in the budget, I think we -- as part of the consensus we had developed -- I think indicated we would, in essence, leave it in the budget. What I'm trying to focus I think, at this point is if that money is in the budget -- and I understand from Mr. Hovell and staff that the breaking it down is a necessary part of the budgetary request, but I just don't think it should necessarily take on a life of its own. And we do need more discussion on this panel perhaps, and, of course, whatever we reach consensus on, it's simply going to be a recommendation up to the commission. I guess you know how budgetary matters work. If it just sails through without any comment or any notation, I don't want it just to carry on with a life of its own. I want it to have a very serious examination, and there are two legitimate sides of the coin here; there's no question about that. And I would agree, too, if not raking made the beaches sort of not compatible with recreational enjoyment, then, you know, it isn't all about the wildlife or the seeding or whatever. But we can see areas that have never been raked, indeed have never been renourished, and they're terrific beaches for people. Now, there hard for people to get there, but if you get there, they're terrific. And I just think, you know, this has been an item -- kind of what happens so often in government-type stuff -- even though, I think, in Collier we try to be careful -- it just gets started, and then it just is perpetual and takes on a life of its own. And the equipment builds up, and you keep doing it and keep doing it, and you kind of forget why you're even doing it at some point. I think we need a careful examination of that. MR. ANDERSON: Mr. Chairman, if I may, Roy Anderson, engineering director. Page 16 One of the things that we'll have to keep in mind, too, in this in terms of investigation is that if these three individuals who have been employed full time in this activity, if their work is cut back, then we would have to do the necessary coordination with other departments to see what other kinds of things they could do in that time, so there would be that administrative aspect. Perhaps there could be other cleaning-related functions associated with the beach, or if there's nothing for them to do during the downtime, then they'd have to be absorbed by some other department. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, that's something staff has to do, but three people with jobs -- I hope they get protected, but that's not a reason to rake the beach. MR. ANDERSON: Oh, no. It's just one of the things we can do as part of this investigation. MR. SNEDIKER: Can we find out more about what is picked up? Mr. Chairman, you brought in some pictures which were, you know, pretty enlightening to us, a couple of Pepsi bottles in a whole dumpster. That's sort of excessive. As far as other things that we were picking up, can we find out more about what we're actually picking up? What are acth~ly in the dumpsters by the time we get through? And then also maybe get some thought about a mule or whatever you want to call it, a pickup track driving up and down the beach -- maybe with the same gentleman driving it -- stopping, picking up, throwing the Pepsi bottle in the back of it. MR. ANDERSON: I think we could come up with some kind of a solid-waste analysis, if you will, of the material that's picked up. We can talk with Al, our inspector, about doing an analysis of, and we'll give a report back to you. MR. SNEDIKER: If we're picking up 90 percent shells and sand, then it's a pretty quick decision. MS. LUPO: I have a quick question, if I may. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yes, Ms. Lupo. MS. LUPO: The seaweed aspect, I'm sorry. I know that at one point there was a beach rake that was broken, I think, in Marco, certain portions hadn't been raked. And l don't believe it was an excessive period of time. I think it was maybe a month, and people had called to complain to both the county and Marco Island about the seaweed accumulation. So I think maybe different beaches have different variables, and perhaps if we could get some type of report as to which ones have complaints if it hasn't been raked within three weeks ago or so or which ones have more accumulation on them. That would help me, at least make a decision. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So this will -- I think we're deciding this will go to the commission with the recommendation of a line item, but as we go on with our meeting today or before we do a motion, I think it needs to include some aspect in the motion -- maybe this one will stand apart -- to say we're recommending it for budgetary funding. But we have work to do. 1 Page 17 We should look at it more, and there are two sides to the coin. It's indisputable. But we had talked about it at the last workshop, and there were five or six different localities, both in the Gulf Coast and on the East Coast of Florida, and they have different variables in their communities, as you point out. When you take those variables into account, I think it's fair to say that Collier County is extremely aggressive in its raking compared to other communities. MR. ROELLIG: I have another comment. I'm concerned that this was -- I know it's part of the county manager's responsibility that this was put into parks and recreation. I would guess that most of the shoreline in Collier County, which this would be covering, is not part of parks and recreation's responsibility. Is there a responsibility basically limited to parks rather than the whole shoreline? MR. HOVELL: If you're asking why does the cover page on the grant application say it's submitted by the parks and recreation department; is that your question? MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. HOVELL: rye been asking since I arrived sort of from the other aspect of why is public utilities engineering the one that administers beach raking? From my point of view, I wanted to view this as a contr/~ci, and the contractor happens to be parks and recs department. They are the ones that have the people on their payroll, and it wouldn't take much for them to own the equipment rather than public utilities engineering owning the three beach rakes. And they could accumulate all the costs associated with this program. But my office would still be involved from the aspect of understanding where they are doing it, that they have the permits to do it, and would still field the calls from the public as far as why things are happening the way they are happening. And we would turn to our contractor, if you will, parks and recs, to address those things. But administratively these people have always worked for parks and rec, and it seems kind of a misnomer to say that public utilities is in the beach-raking business because we're not. We don't have the people to do it. MR. ROELLIG: My thing is that if you put it in parks and rec I presume this goes before the parks and recreation advisory committee. And, we have two different philosophies I would be surprised. I mean, this is an activity on the beach, which affects the beach, and I think it -- I personally would feel that it would be more appropriate in the utilities division. MS. HORTON: Mr. Chairman? CHAIKMAN GALLEBERG: Yes. MS. HORTON: We would also like to see ~- like you said, I guess what you're in the process of doing is setting up specific definitive criteria and/or triggers for when beach raking would occur. We would also suggest -- like again, you have these three employees, why not let them manually pick up the trash by hand? Eliminate some of the vehicles and traffic of vehicles on the beach, which result in more compaction. Like I said, you can't regulate -- they are not supposed to go into the water and up in dune Page 18 00= ! 6 J vegetation, but as we all know, it just happens sometimes. Another point I'd like to make is as you are formulating these policies, the people who malnt~ and/or monitor the beach for raking, their job shouldn't depend on how.~ often the beach gets raked. So we'd like to see kind of an impartial or a secure way to make sure that they are not going to get over raked because somebody may or may not lose their job so... CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Maybe we'll come back to this one, but shall we, at least for the moment, go on to some of the other items ? Ms. Lupo is leaving us at the moment. ~. MS. LUPO: Yes. And I apologize, and I did speak to Mr. Hovell beforehand. And I understand that there's a future meetings discussion later on in this meeting. And just for the record, Friday afternoons are really not possible for me. If we could somehow adjust that back to where it was or the morning or another day. (Ms. Lupo leaves the meeting.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Thank you. MR. HOVELL: The next grant application is for the sea turtle monitoring and beach studies and, in essence, that is Maura Kraus and her staff work on providing that, and that's for $142,000. MR. PIRES: Mr. Chairman, a couple of thoughts. Number 1, I like the format because this wasn't just -- was more of a narrative and not just a rote answer, so I think that helps, you know, address the purpose of the questionnaire to go into greater detail as to the nature of the activity. My other question, I guess, is there are no capital costs, I guess, associated with this. This is all personnel services and is there not some capital equipment that's utilized as part of this program, either ATVs or some other capital equipment? MR. HOVELL: Well, Maura Kraus is here. If you'd like to ask her to step to the microphone, she could address that, I'm sure. MS. KRAUS: I'm Maura Kraus, Collier County Natural Resource Department. We currently have all our capital equipment, and maintenance costs are absorbed in the operating part of the budget. MR. PIRES: Okay. Thank you. And does staff feel this is a sufficient level of funding in order to keep all the agencies happy with all the various construction and renourishment and other beach activities in the next year? I know it's tough to... MS. KRAUS: Yeah. That's always hard to predict, but we have, you know, our current staff and we -- you can see we do a lot more than sea turtle monitoring in there. And we work very closely with the state. For instance, this year just in case we might have to go into turtle season with some of our projects, we're going to start our monitoring early, and that's just taken care of internally, so we absorb that within the department, and we're real careful with our money. 1 Page 19 1 6 d MR. HOVELL: The next grant application covers project management and miscellaneous fees. And I just captured some of the things that we previously don't tend to see in the form of a grant application just to try and give people a feel that there is ,~ other monies going out the door that, you know, aren't otherwise covered. And those tend to relate to the -- I believe it's the finance folks that get to collect some money based on administering the tourist tax fund. The county attorney's office had gotten approved, I think, maybe a half-a-man a year or some such thing. They are things that just, I guess, through the budget process appeared, and I just tried to collect all those things and added into what public utilities tends to spend in the form of salaries for the three positions and the support cost. ~ I believe last year this was around $290,000 -- or I believe the current year. We're still showing the $280,000 for the three positions, the $24,000 for support, and then the other $300,000 is for the tax collector and those other miscellaneous things I just mentioned that, I think regardless of any of our particular thoughts, they just kind of get built into the budget. So I was just trying to show that it is something that we can expect to foot the bill for. MR. ROELLIG: And that's spread ~icross all the items, though, typically, isn't it? MR. HOVELL: It's probably considered an overhead cost, but it's -- as it's -- as a matter of fact, on the monthly spreadsheet that I give you, this does not get a separate project number. It's just sort of the overhead account, if you will; much as my time and Al's time is spread across the various activities. We don't try and charge the individual project that we're working on. The next set of applications are all slightly different in the sense that either staff does not recommend that they be done or like the last three are for parks and recs that will actually -- the primary recommendation will come from the parks and recs advisory board. You're not required to comment on them. The first one being for the Goodland Civic Association. They have submitted their grant application. And, in essence, what they are asking for is the engineering associated with determining, you know, a budget estimate for dredging the canals, taking a survey, getting the permits, and getting the design ready to dredge the canals and adjacent waterways there in Goodland. Staff does not recommend that this is appropriately funded with TDC funds. MR. PIRES: I was going to ask you that question, Ron, because when I saw it in the package, I'm thinking -- I wasn't -- I had a sense that because it was included with all this that the staff had a positive position on it, so your position is you're not recommending -- MR. HOVELL: That's correct. MR. PIRES: -- any of the following, the last five, I guess, or four. MR. HOVELL: I'll go to the next one. The next three are all parks and recs submissions that would come out of TDC funds but, again, the primary recommendation for the Bayview pedestrian access for 125,500, the Tiger Tail walkway design for Page 20 200,000, and the Tiger Tail beach entrance for 150,000, those three I have captured in a single line item on the ten-year plan, and those will go through the parks and recs advisory board to the Tourist Development Council. *' But, again, I was just trying to show the total Category A projects for next year. I'm sorry I skipped one. I also put in here the Lake Trafford restoration for a million dollars. That grant application was approved for $2 million a number of years ago, but ultimately when the specific agreement between Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District was negotiated and executed, it calls for a three-year phased approach: $500,000 in our current year, a million dollars next year, and $500,000 the following year. .~ So I didn't even write up a grant application because it's certainly nothing that needs to be approved. It already is approved. But it will be a next-fiscal-year budget item that will come out of the TDC Category A funds. MR. SNEDIKER: I have a couple comments on the Goodland project. Just for clarification information, Goodland is on Marco Island but is not within the City of Marco Island. Goodland is part of the unincorporated area of the county. As I read the state statutes -- and Yrri not trying to be an attorney here, but state statutes and our county ordinance, that dredging those canals would not be allowed with TDC funds. Am I interpreting that correctly? MR. HOVELL: I believe you are, and I specifically asked for a legal opinion from the county attorney's office, and I didn't get anything prior to today's meeting. But I have a meeting set up next week to answer some more of their questions and go over what their current thinking is. But I don't envision how there's a way to interpret those statutes to include dredging those particular canals and waterways. MR. SNEDIKER: If that's the case, then we sort of can't approve. MR. ROELLIG: My question on this -- and we don't have the information -- are there fishing guides using that? Do tour boats use those canals? I mean, I don't know of personally, but is there actually some activity relating to tourism occurring in those canals? I think that would be main -- as far as I'm concerned, that's part of the main question. (Mr. Pires leaves the meeting.) MR. ROELLIG: If there were other fishing guides, if there were tour boats, that sort of thing, using those canals, then it may be appropriate because it is a tourist activity in that sense. MR. HOVELL: I think you'll find that perhaps not the canal themselves, but certainly the adjacent waterways. Goodland has interior canals as well as either bays or passes or whatever happens to be around them~ I know certainly on the outskirts of that there are marinas, and I believe there's a restaurant that has some docks you can get up to, that type of thing. So from a pure tourism point of view, I think an argument could be made for at 1 Page 21 March 15, 2002 1 6 J least some of the areas. But my first step was to take a look at what the Florida statute and county ordinance allow TDS funds to be spent on, and I don't feel that this meets that criteria, r~ ' Once you get past that initial hurdle, then the second question to be asked is, you know, the value to tourism, and the value -~ you know, that type of things. So I don't really think you can get into the tourism discussion until you answer if it is eligible for TDC funds. And, as I say, I don't think it is, and I believe that will be the oPinion that the county attorney gives back to me. MR. ROELLIG: Well, my personal view is that you'd want to switch those two questions, but that's just my view. I mean, if there's a legitimate tourist activity going up there, then we ought to look to see if there's some way to accommodate it. But if there is no tourist activity, it's really a moot point in my opinion. MR. HOVELL: With all due respect to this committee, my understanding is that that's what the Tourist Development Council does is take a look at the tourism value, and this committee's charter is more on the technical aspect of whether or not it's, you know, the appropriate thing to do, and I know we've had this discussion before but related to the coast. (Mr. Pires returns to meeting.) MR. HOVELL: And if it's strictly the TDC coast then, no, I don't think this is something that you can really weigh it on, but if it's the more broad sense that it is coastline related, isn't there something else you can do? I think, yes, there are some other things you can do. The only other current option I have is to set up a special taxing district for the area. I think it's something that our office will pursue, but I just don't think we'll be pursuing it using TDC funds. MR. ROELLIG: I guess more of my problem is -- I don't have a rationale for voting one way or the other on this with the information that I have. I can't vote no and I can't yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Dr. Staiger, you were going to say something? DR. STAIGER: Yeah. The Board of County Commissioners quite a few years ago more or less set a precedent on this when we were asking for the funds to dredge Doctor's Pass under the beach and inlet management umbrella of the Category A applications. And the board was very concerned because part of the Doctor's Pass project is the inner approaches to the inlet, which run up into Moorings Bay a certain distance and down to the south as smaller distance or lesser distance. And the concern was that we weren't trying to dredge those waterways. What we were dredging -- and we explained it basically the approach to the inlet and what would be the flood tide shoal area that's part of the inlet system. And they made it very clear at that time -- and this is probably 1992 or '3 -- that waterway dredging, canal dredging, was something that had to be funded separately the way the city's been, the Moorings Bay dredging and the East Naples Bay and the like. And we're looking at -- an assessment 1 Page 22 district for the Aqualane Shores area for a similar project. And at that time, at least, the board said, you know, we don't want those funds going to, you know, just every other canal system maintenance dredging. That's something that basically benefits those waterfront property owners, and it should be their responsibility. Goodland is a little bit different situation because there's a lot of commercial fishing activity out of there. There's a bunch of guides. There's marinas. And this is not the same Board of County Commissioners, but I know in the past they were very leery of extending the thing too far into the interior of the waterways. So we've held off with the Doctor's Pass project and just kept it with the pass itself and the obvious approaches to it and not tried to, you know, move further into the interior CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Stakich. MR. STAKICH: Yes. Just recently the county commissioners bought a piece of land down in Goodland for $4,500,000 for a park and for boat docks. They are discussing the boat docks, and at this time nothing has been decided on it yet. Secondly, tourism -- of which the tourist dollars we are talking about are to be spent for tourism and Goodland, is a superb place for tourists of this county to use. If you go down there on Sunday, you will note ~hht that place is absolutely a madhouse. I don't go there for that reason, but it is. I think that, frankly, if legally -- and that depends on the opinion you get from the legal department -- if legally we can look into this thing, I would be fully in favor of looking into what part of Goodland -- because there are parts there that I can see where it could be used for dredging to bring the boats into the restaurants for tourist activities without worrying about the canals themselves. I think it's something we should look at. I think it depends on legal opinion, and once we have that, I think we should bring back this discussion and do it again. MR. SNEDIKER: What might be very helpful is that if the legal opinion is affirmative that we can do it with our funds it to find out from the people who are making the applications exactly where they want to have dredged. You're talking about the bay where the commercial fishermen is? That's one thing, or if they want to talk about where the restaurants are or the interior canals, maybe a map of the area saying where they would like to have this funding for. MR. STAKICH: Absolutely. MR. SNEDIKER: Then we know more what we're talking about. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I agree with all that that we have the staff recommendation presently, which is important, and then the attorney's recommendation. If the attorney says you can't do it, I think that's the end of the story. And better clarity on -- as Mr. Snediker says -- which canals are intended to be dredged because I had the impression -- maybe I gathered the wrong impression -- when you discussed this at a prior meeting, Mr. Hovell, I had the impression that these were interior canals, basically canals in the back of people's homes. MR. HOVELL: Most of it is. MR. ANDERSON: Although part of the application does indicate that it's desired Page 23 1 for easier access to restaurants and RV park patrons and residents of Goodland. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think at a minimum we need more facts before us before we can say yes. And the county attorney's opinion might well end the discussion here and now once we get it. But I don't think we can say yes based on what we know now. MR. STAKICH: Agreed. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That finishes then except for we may want to go back to the raking again, of course, but we had had a discussion at our prior workshop on how to classify reserves against contingencies and what the two line items mean and that type of thing. ~ So I'll note it's a good thing -- I suppose it's a good thing in the sense that you don't often see it out of governmental agencies, but we are budgeting less than what the projected revenues available are for the current year. And I know we have to save up for future years, but I think we can have better clarity between our true reserves, which I see as an ongoing matter that roll from year to year guarding against the big event. And contingencies, which would go more to -- okay, we've said a certain project would be $50,000; it turns out that it's 55.~ To me that's a contingency. And anyone else who'd like to talk about that, I think we can have better clarity on what we're doing there because it seems to me that if these funds are available, we need to be recommending what to do. And to the extent we have needed projects this year that don't come up to the total of the funding that we think will be available, it should be going either into a reserve or a contingency, and that's just almost like an accounting matter. It needs to go somewhere. MR. SNEDIKER: Mr. Chairman, we have these three additional items, though, don't, we to discuss? MR. HOVELL: Well, my suggestion would be that out of this list from Wiggins Pass down to Goodland -- because those bottom four we really don't need to do anything with -- we pull out those that have questions or we might want to modify or whatnot, and then take the bulk of them and do one motion for -- my suggestion would be approval. The ones that I know of that we would want to pull out for discussion would be the City of Naples for the $9,000 on the structures because I think we can do something this year rather than make a separate grant application, and the beach raking, and the Goodland canals would be the three that I would know of that I think you would want to pull out. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And also we had a discussion on the Hideaway Beach and T-groin monitoring. Mr. Roellig had raised the issue that it appears that has a contingency built in, and none of the others do, that we would search for consistency. And that would relate back to what I was just saying about reserves and contingencies. And then Mr. Snediker just noted -- and I temporarily forgot that we do have three more that we need to discuss that weren't in our packet. MR. HOVELL: I know, but we're going to need to go over those in more detail, Page 24 plus Dr. Staiger brought one with him as well that he'll want to hand out. So I was thinking maybe if we could get to the book first, and then we'll move on to the other ones. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Before we do a formal motion then -- and Mr. Hovell's probably correct -- if we can take the ones that there's probably unanimous consensus on and move those is -- before we actually do that, is everyone agreed that we would -- according to Mr. Hovell's recommendations and our discussions -- take out the $9,000 item from the City of Naples from any group approval. It would be Hideaway Beach and T-groin monitoring because of that contingency issue, beach cleaning operations because of the philosophical debate we're having, and the Goodland canals because we don't deem -- we don't feel we have information on to say yes, and it may well be a fLrm no. That's not to say those other things won't be approved. It's just they need to be discussed separately. MR. KROESCHELL: Mr. Chairman, I have a problem. I'm going to go with this thing this time, and I probably should have done this last year, but it bothers me to see a proposal, $140,000 engineering. Some of the city's proposals have details: how many hours of engineering time at such and such a time. I would like to see, for example, beach renourishment, so many cubic yards at so much a yard. Just an overall grant of a million dollars or $140,000, it bothers me. I'd like to see greater detail in all of these proposals, and I don't think we can do it this time, perhaps, but I would definitely want to see it next year. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That's a point well taken. You have -- Mr. Hovell, you and staff have, I assume, some background data that you use to work up to these numbers, do you not? MR. HOVELL: The bulk of these set of grant applications is for engineering fees, and the bulk of them are provided by the engineer as a single line item budget estimate with no other details. Now, in the city's case, they has specifically gone to the engineer and asked for the specific cost proposal, and they have typically attached that. And that's why they have the level of detail that they do. MR. KROESCHELL: And why can't we do that in the county? Why can't the county do the same thing the city does? MR. HOVELL: Next year perhaps we can, but this year we're lucky that we're executing this year's program much less focusing on next year's program, so I don't --. MR. PIRES: Ron, you're saying that from the city's perspective, they have an existing contract with Humiston and Moore. What they are proposing -- it might be a continuing contract. I'm not sure how it fits under CCNA, that they're proposing just to do a supplemental modification to that existing contract, add a particular scope of services. Whereas, the budgetary issues for the other projects, for engineering services, 1 Page 25 haven't even been solicited yet. Is that correct? MR. HOVELL: That's right. MR. PIRES: We haven't done RFQs or RFPs for those? *' MR. HOVELL: That's correct. MR. PIRES: So that's why you have a generalized number based upon historical dollars. Is that the difference then? MR. HOVELL: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But next year that should be different because we now have a relationship with three fkms --. MR. HOVELL: Right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- although that didn't start soon enough to impact this year's work, but next year the county should be more on the same footing as the city is presently. We've got three that we work with. We get, you know, some detailed estimates from them next year, and it's broken down better. MR. HOVELL: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Good point, Mr. Kroeschell, very good point. MR. KROESCHELL: I think thaf klnd of survey, too, would then begin to show up some of these contingencies and other items that are in there that we don't see because it's all in one number. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Exactly. And it's easy to criticize people no longer here, of course, but a lot of effort and other committees' efforts have been to put -- and the staff in particular -- have been to put some structure in the process that everyone could acknowledge lacks structure. So we'll continue those efforts. I had mentioned the four items to pull for further discussion and separate votes. Excepting those four, do we have a motion on the other applications before us? MR. ROELLIG: I move that we approve the applications with the exception of the -- this is not part of the motion. I thought previously there was, like, a serial number on these things so you could identify them. Is that correct? At least I thought so. It would be a good idea -- the project number 2345 or 567. It would be a lot easier to discuss them, I think -- back to the motion. So it would be 9,000 for the City of Naples, 245,000 for the beach clearing operations -- cleaning operations --. MR. KROESCHELL: $150,000 for beach (inaudible). MR. ROELLIG: 150,000 for beach (inaudible). MR. SNEDIKER: You're talking about reducing that to a hundred, taking out the contingency of that. MR. ROELLIG: Well, I think what we might want to do is -- MR. KROESCHELL: Do it separately. MR. ROELLIG: Right. And I think the fourth one was the Goodland Civic Association, if I recall correctly. MR. KROESCHELL: Yep. 1 Page 26 1 6 J MR. ROELLIG: So with the exception of those, I would move that the grant applications be approved as submitted. MR. PIRES: Recommended for approval, I guess is the technical MR. ROELLIG: Recommended for approval. MR. STAKICH: Second that. CHAIRM~ GALLEBERG: Mr. Staldch got in first on his second. We have Mr. Roellig's motion, Mr. Stakich's second. I'll just restate briefly. We have a motion recommending approval of the grant applications before us other than the $9,000 application by the City of Naples, the 150,000 application dealing with Hideaway Beach and T-groin monitoring, the 245,000 beach cleaning operations application, and the 150,000 Goodland canals dredging application. We have the motion and second -- MR. SNEDIKER: And the last four items. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, those aren't even on our agenda. They're just there for information. MR. SNEDIKER: Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: W~ tiave the motion and second. All in favor say aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Aye. MR. ROELLIG: Aye. MR. SNEDIKER: Aye. MR. STAKICH: Aye. MR. KROESCHELL: Aye. MR. PIRES: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Passes 6 to 0. Now, Mr. Hovell, if you deem it advisable, why don't we get into the three applications that were not included in our main packet. MR. HOVELL: Okay. I handed out three, and if I could ask Dr. Staiger to add his fourth one we'll go through those one by one. The first one --. MR. ROELLIG: MR. HOVELL: MR. ROELLIG: MR. HOVELL: Excuse me. I guess I didn't get a copy of yours. It's underneath the ten-year plan in a paper clip. Okay, I see. Under the ten-year plan. The first one is a grant application entitled "Beach Emergency Response Plan." The amount of the application is for $25,000, and this is basically to develop a storm recovery plan for our beaches so that the next time we have something like Tropical Storm Gabrielle we have the appropriate permits and sand sources lined up such that not only is our current method of trucking in sand, but if it's a large enough storm and we wanted to do a major dredge project, that we would have all those appropriate permits in hand, and we could go out and within -- certainly within a year anyway we'd be in a position to go and do a major renourishment project to recover from 1 Page 27 16 J a storm. This is something that was suggested, I believe, by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection under their beaches and coastal systems office. And when we did our project agreement with them, they had included this as a line item, which they've also agreed to cost share and is already in our approved project agreement, but we had never taken action to include it in the county's budget. Should this grant application be ultimately approved by the Board of County Commissioners, I will be asking for a budget amendment to include it as part of this year's budget so that we can get on with developing this -- the $25,000 is based on an initial budget estimate from Coastal Planning and Engineering. They've done these types of plans for other counties. The state considers them a very valuable tool, and as I said, they've agreed to cost share on a 50 percent -- 50/50 basis. MR. KROESCHELL: The state has agreed. MR. HOVELL: The state has agreed to cost share. MR. PIRES: Ron, part of this, I know -- think when the other grant applications addressed issue about annual monitoring or surveying, and I noticed that in those applications it didn't address that one ofth~ beneficial aspects would be the ability to utilize that for post-disaster funding. We had an issue with Mark Wyland (phonetic). We did not have the 2000 monitoring, which was one of the hiccups down there. The scope of this $25,000 number, are those surveys included in that also, or is that under the other grant applications, the annual surveys for annual monitoring? MR. HOVELL: That's correct. No, the $25,000 is more just to come up the -- you know, to put together the specific permits and, actually, there's going to be another grant application here in a minute for a countywide sand search. It would be to take the sand search results, the monitoring results, and those types of things, and to take a look at our specific beaches and, you know, put together a package that, in essence, provides something that's pretty much on the shelf so that when we need to recover from something larger than a trucking evolution might be able to £~x for us, that we have a way to go. MR. MR. the current PIRES: Good thinking. Thank you. ROELLIG: I want to make it clear. This is for the entire shoreline, not just and permitted shorelines; is that correct? MR. HOVELL: I would like to think we'll work in that direction but, again, it's hard to say. No, I don't think it's under an existing permit, and so, yes, I think the idea is to have a generic permit to do a major renourishment for 100 percent of those areas that we feel are appropriate to spend TDC dollars on. Now, there are some other beaches in the county that we aren't currently spending any money on and, therefore, I think it would still be a question that we would have: to address as far as would we want -- to recover from a major storm, would we want to go ahead and get into that business or not. REPORTER: Mr. Chairman, I need to change my paper. Page 28 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: MarchlS, 2002 1 ~a We're usually supposed to go about two hours for REPORTER: No, not me. "~ CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Why don't we take -- while we do that, it's a good time to take a five-minute break. Even though we're kind of in the middle of things, it's still a good time. (A break was held.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We're back from our brief break. We were somewhat in the middle of discussing an item, the countywide sand search. It was a good time to take a break. Why don't we pick up with that discussion. MR. HOVELL: I'm sorry. I believe Mr. Pires was asking about the beach emergency response plan grant application and what it did or didn't include. And I had mentioned that there is another one coming up. He isn't here to see if we answered his question right this second. But I guess my question would be as we go through these additional grant applications that you didn't get in advance of today's meeting, do you want to vote on them one at a time, or do you want me t6 jo through all of them first? MR. KROESCHELL: Let's go through all of them and see if there are any we want to pull out. MR. HOVELL: Okay. Anyway, just to recap one more time, the beach emergency response plan would include developing all the permits and preliminary plans and specifications and the funding options to recover from a storm. So if there are currently beaches where we don't spend any TDC dollars, you know, I believe the plan would address that type of thing, and it would also speak to which beaches would be potentially be reimbursed by FEMA because they are engineered and maintained versus which beaches we currently don't maintain but what the funding options would be to restore them after a storm anyway. That's what the plan's intended to address. MR. ROELLIG: So this includes all the beaches, not just the TDC beaches. MR. HOVELL: That's correct. MR. ROELLIG: Oh, okay. DR. STAIGER: This issue came before the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association as a technical paper a year or two ago, presentation on the development of this plan for one of the east coast counties. And the whole concept was very positively received by everybody, especially DEP, because it gives them the ability to deal with emergencies without having to just kind of give a blanket approval for emergency storm recovery, and sometimes things are done under that umbrella that really aren't appropriate. So this essentially gives you a recovery plan that's written out in advance with whatever permits are needed to do it. And the state is willing to pay 50 percent of it, which obviously means that they like the idea. So it's something we need rather than just wait for a disaster and then you start calling Tallahassee and saying, "Hey, we got a Page 29 16J problem down here. We need to. solve it." And they may or may not say "yes." And I think this just gives us a better chance on dealing with emergencies on a rational and probably cost-effective basis. MR. SNEDIKER: 25,000's our portion. It's a $50,000 project; is that correct? MR. HOVELL: I'd have to go back and pull the budget estimate I got from Coastal Planning and Engineering. I want to say that I had to put in grant applications for 100 percent because the state reimburses. They don't pay the bill up front. So I'm pretty sure this is the total cost, and they would pay half. So we would get 12 1/2 back, if I'm correct. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions on that item? MR. HOVELL: The next one is the countywide sand search. This also is a project that had been included in the project agreement with the state. At the time the figure of $300,000 was thrown around, and so the state contract says that they will cost share on a 50 percent basis based on the budget assumption of the $300,000. I got the feedback from Coastal Planning and Engineering, and they have looked at, at least, some of the information provided previously by Coastal Engineering Consultants. They've provided a budget figure 'bf~ somewhere from $5 to $600,000. So I turned this in for the $600,000 figure. But, much like anything else we're doing, I think we would have them do it in phases and make sure that as we go along we're satisfied that they are doing the appropriate level of detail and at a reasonable cost. MR. PIRES: When you say 40 miles -- within 40 miles of Collier County, is that sand source? Is that offshore because it seems to indicate searching for offshore sand sources within 40 miles? You're talking out in the Gulf 40 miles? MR. HOVELL: That is correct, offshore, out into the Gulf. MR. PIRES: What's the furthest out that we've ever gone for a sand source in the past? MR. HOVELL: Historically, we've stayed very close to shore, and that's one of the reasons we had a challenge five or so years ago with pumping rocks on the beach. I don't know if you were at the workshop when we discussed this, so I'll -- excuse me if I'm repeating it for anybody else. MR. PIRES: I apologize. MR. HOVELL: But when you do major renourishment projects by pumping sand onto the beach, there's a couple different options for the type of equipment you use. What we did about five or so years ago was in essence, pump sand from the bottom of the Gulf directly onto the beach. And whatever happened to be down there is what went on the beach. The further offshore you go, the more likely it is that you would move to a different type of equipment where you would use a hopper dredge to pull the sand up from the bottom. Once it's full you'd get underway, move offshore of Collier County, and then pump it up onto our beaches. To me the advantage of that system is you get to see what you're going to be putting on the beach before you put it on the beach. And Page 30 because you're to some extent double handling it, you also get the option to screen it before you put it on the beach. So the likelihood of having a repeat of the major rock issue that we've had for the last five or six years would be greatly reduced if we went further offshore and specifically required the hopper dredge type of evolution. So previous sand searches have tended to stay close to shore with a view toward keeping the costs lower, pumping, you know, from immediately adjacent offshore -- I'm not sure I should say a lot -- but less expensive, anyway, than the further off you go. My guidance to Coastal Planning and Engineering was that if they found something that was only a mile offshore, I still wanted a hopper dredge to come get it because that way we get a chance to screen it. And so I thought it was appropriate to make sure that we expanded and found the best quality sand for the county and also with a view toward using some equipment that would eliminate the risk of putting something incompatible on the beach. MR. PIRES: Are there any other coastal counties on the Gulf coast that have gone this far out for a sand source? MR. HOVELL: I believe Lee Cotinl~y is -- either Lee County or another entity within Lee County just did something with Coastal Planning and Engineering. As a matter of fact, when we first met the president and his senior engineer when they came over to meet us after having been awarded the contract, they brought with them some of that work they had done. And I know it was at least out to 25 miles, and maybe that's just where the sand had been identified that they would specifically use. Maybe the search had gone out to the same 40-mile distance. MR. SNEDIKER: Wasn't there some talk about sand being near the county line, between Lee County and Collier County? MR. HOVELL: Yeah. That's the one I'm --. MR. SNEDIKER: And maybe sharing that? MR. HOVELL: Right. And as I recall, that was about -- I think that was the 25 mile. MR. SNEDIKER: That's far out. MR. PIRES: If you do go out further than 9 miles, though, we're not even in the counties any longer because we're outside the territory of the United States and the states (sic). Florida extends three leagues; that is 9 miles in the Gulf coast (sic). MR. HOVELL: You're right. We would no longer deal with the state on submerged land issues, but we would still deal with the Army Corps. I believe -- well, I don't know what the distance is, but I'm pretty sure that 40 miles is within it, although I don't believe they charge for, you know, in essence, using that federal resource. But they still require us to have a permit. DR. STAIGER: Yeah. Mineral Management Service has custody over that material, and they -- some years ago had the realization that people were mining sand from the continental shelf, and so they decided they were going to charge a severance fee Page 31 for every cubic yard of sand. And there was such uproar in Congress about it that they backed off from that. They now -- they still own the material, but they don't -- I don't believe charge-a fee for use of it. But the beach restoration in '95, '96, the site of the sand source was about 7 1/2 to 8 miles out. So it was within the state's jurisdiction. I think the longest distance that anybody that I'm aware of has hauled was Reddington Beach, and they hauled about 13 miles. But it was a north/south haul rather than offshore. They mined the sand from the shoal out by the mouth of Tampa Bay, and they took it north and put it on the beach in Pinellas County. When we were looking at this preliminary offshore sand search a couple of years ago, they looked offshore probably 10 or 12 miles and then south -- down south of Marco and off of Cape Romano, and that was where, actually, I think the most appropriate material was found, which is some miles west and south of Cape Romano. Out in that area there's an awful lot of sand. Most everything that comes off the beaches of Collier County north of there has ended up down there in the Cape Romano shoals. So that's a logical source. It may be in our jurisdiction; it may not. But the Mineral Management Service is not unhappy with use of that miterial for restoration of public beaches. MR. PIRES: Thank you. MR. SNEDIKER: Ron, assuming this goes through, when could we expect to see the report? Any estimate on that? MR. HOVELL: Uh --. MR. SNEDIKER: Do they give you a time frame as to how long it would take? MR. HOVELL: If they did I don't remember what it was, and I didn't bring that with me. But both of these, the emergency response plan and the county-wide sand search, should it be approved all the way through the Board of County Commissioners, again, I would propose that both of them be budget amendments to this year so that we can get on with it. I think in general I've heard that sand searches seem to take in the neighborhood of a year or maybe even two when you include the permitting. MR. SNEDIKER: Yeah. This one took several years before it finally got done. MR. ROELLIG: My only point is (inaudible), but basically, once you start transporting sand by water, it's the -- distance is not a big cost factor either. Once you got it on the barges is whether you take it 40 miles or 100 miles. By cubic yard, it doesn't make much difference. So I don't know where the 40 came from, but I wouldn't be necessarily limited to that as far as transportation goes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think it's very hard to understand, at least for a layman, the $600,000 number because it seems like studies such as this should be able to build on prior work, or maybe they do. But then that makes me ask why so much money? If you just said the old Coastal -- former Coastal was $300,000, and they had done, if I recall, somewhere around $200,000 for the work and found for our purposes Page 32 March 15, 2002 1 nearly an infinite sand source, I don't understand doing this again -- or I would understand maybe having to update it or enhance it. I don't understand the huge dollar amount, particularly when the same £m-n has done work in Lee, and we have the existing work from the other Coastal. I know there's got to be a reason for it. You don't come by the 600 casually. I'd like to have that explained. I don't, certainly, understand it on the surface. MR. HOVELL: No, and I don't disagree. I mean, it's a question that I've tried broaching with them as far as are they sure that they've really looked at whatever data might be available from Coastal Engineering Consultants, how much will this overlap -- I mean, 40 m/les, that could go a fair way into Lee County, which they've already done. But there's also -- on the flip side, there's also a lot of requirements that are somewhat imposed by the state when they are cost-sharing this with us. They require a lot of GIS- related data that we might otherwise have asked for or gotten. So I'm not sure other than perhaps getting status -- actually inviting them during the progress of this thing and getting status reports from them and making sure that ultimately whatever amount of money we spend is explained to us. I certainly see that as a good thing. But for purposes of putting ih a grant application, given that we are where we are, I accepted their budget number and just put it into the grant application. It doesn't necessarily mean I'm going to turn around and sign a contract with them for the whole 600,000 by any means. You know, the other thing to keep in mind is that these are the folks that we've kept very busy over the last six weeks on the rock-removal plan. So they've not really had time to focus on longer-range issues. MR. GALLEBERG: But still, then there may well be an answer. But, again, if you look at it from a lay perspective, we have the report that says there's appropriate sand and, again for our purposes, basically infinite quantities off of Cape Romano. I could understand if that needed to be confirmed or updated or present engineers needed to give their opinions since we're not working with Coastal -- the old Coastal anymore. I could understand all that. I just don't understand that this thing has to be sui generis, that it's starting from the -- you don't have to say that word because that's a Latin phrase -- but that we have to start from the beginning. Retrain my old legal training here. DR. STAIGER: Some of this cost is probably the sampling. It depends. I'm not familiar with the proposal, but if you're going to define a borrowed source to the point where you can actually use it in a contract document, then you've got to do an awful lot of coring. And it's vibra coring, and that is done with a specialized rig, and there are not that many people around who do it. And that gets to be pretty pricey. I mean, a-half-a- m/Ilion dollars worth may be a lot more, but I know that that was the one thing that Coastal Engineering Consultants had not done, which was to go out and do a great deal of definition of borrow area, and that was one of the concerns was after the restorationin '95, '96 was that they hadn't defined the borrow areas with a sufficient number of cores to find the rock that the ended up on the beach, so that I think Coastal Engineering is looking at more frequent coring intervals to make sure that they define the material Page 33 better. And that gets pretty expensive. But I haven't looked at the proposal. March 15, 2002 1 6 J i have a feeling that's probably part of why the cost is up there. * CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So where we sit today then, the work that Coastal Engineering Did -- the old Coastal -- other than giving us a lead that there well may be sand in that Cape Romano area, doesn't have any value to us today? DR. STAIGER: Oh, I think it's very valuable because it defines the area where you can then go in and get much better definition. I think it's the issue of how deep does the sands go is how much contamination is in it in the form of unsuitable material, rock or clay something like that. And I think they did some jet pro~bing perhaps, but I don't remember the detail they went to, but I know that they recommended that the next phase would be a lot more detailed sampling with a lot more coting. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So part of the 600 includes different phases then that -- and I'm just saying the 300,000 figure because I think that's we said earlier. The 600 we're looking at includes more in different phases. DR. STAIGER: That would be, I think, the followup -- more like the second phase of what's already been started, I think. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Snediker, I think you had a couple comments. MR. SNEDIKER: They did vibra core logs. They are right in the report. DR. STAIGER: Okay. MR. SNEDIKER: And they went out, but this being the coastline (indicating) they are out here 17 miles out in various test areas. Down here, this being Cape Romano shoals, is where they found the sand, I think. So they did -- and I'm not trying to defend them, but they did a pretty exhaustive survey on that and did a lot of testing. Now, they did not do, I think, the hopper -- David, I think -- MR. ROELLIG: Clam shell. MR. SNEDIKER: Clamshell so we can take it out and spread it all over. When they do their samples up to now, they're done with a screen, in effect, at the bottom, which has a tendency albeit to eliminate the rocks. So I think a lot of work is done, and I sure hope that if we pay someone $600,000 that they don't reinvent the world here, reinvent the wheel. MR. ROELLIG: My thoughts on this is if we would only recommend a contract to pull this information together and get kind of a reconnaissance or sort of a minor feasibility report out of them for, let's say, $25 or maybe $50,000, and then we'd be at a decision point rather than do the whole 600,000, or if we do want to recommend the whole 600,000 that we still put in as a decision point, that they come back after, you know, some modest amount of money $25 or $50,000, let them review the prior work and come up with what their plan of action would be for the rest of it. Because as Dr. Staiger said, when you get into vibra coring and all the sampling and geophysical analysis, that can be very expensive. And we don't want to get to the end and find out that we should have stopped after 35,000 or something of that sort. 1 Page 34 ! 6 J So that would be -- if I was making a motion, that's the way ! would phrase it. Now, I don't lcnow how the rest of -- MR. HOV~LL: The engineer -- Coastal Pluming and Engineefing provided a- draft scope of se~wices back, I think -- actually, this one they provided back in December, and because it was oMy listed to be cost shared with the state, I sent it to the state for their comment. Well, I just got the state's comments back, I believe it was last week, and they did make a number of changes, some of which cost more money. And then based on what ! thought was at least a scope that had various phases in it, then ! went back to Coastal and said -- and as you'll note, this didn't make it into the book. We're so close to the budget year, can you at least give me a budget figure that I can put a g~ant application together for. But, no, I certainly didn't mean to imply that was going to be one single contracting effom, and we would just sign and wait till they expend the whole amount of money before we get any results. I think from the contracting point of view, you're ~ght. They'll be Phase 1 prelimina~ reports. My point of view, too, some proof that they've incorporated all available data before they start creating new data, and that we would go from there. MR. ROELLIG: Is that a problem ~ith the state as far as their cost sharing? MR. HOVELL: No, I don't think so. MR. ROELLIG: I don't want to -- to me, I don't want to go out and just to get cost sharing have the county spend $600,000 when we could have done it for 50 without cost sharing. MR. HOVELL: No, I agree. I agree. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I was going to say essentially what Mr. Roellig just said about the $600,000 number. I think we can probably all agree that this activity is worthwhile and something that we would wholeheartedly recommend, but just as Mr. Kroeschell was saying earlier, that a $30 or $50,000 line item that says engineering services doesn't provide enough detail that's true for those dollar amounts, and it's more true for this even. And we understand why we don't have that detail. But I think, you know -- and I know that Mr. Veil (phonetic) and Dr. Staiger know their field very well, but for us trying to make a recommendation to just say this stuff can be expensive, and then you arrive at 600 -- and I know they told you 600 -- I wouldn't want to recommend that. If we can do it feasibly, I'd like to go along Mr. Roellig's route. I don't know what the numbers should be. That, I would like to get some advice on. If it's 25,000, 50,000, what can be suitably done in this round, and maybe you put a little bit on top of that for flexibility. But to do the whole thing right now without really having anything before us, I think is going too far. Because, then again, things can change in the future, but that becomes its own organism kind of. All of a sudden there's 600,000 in the budget, and it becomes almost self-fulfilling, or it could. It may not, but it very easily could. I think that's going too far fight now to do that. And also even the mere fact of dredging, we understand the need to look, and it 1 Page 35 16J March 15, 2002 may be the only way to do a large-scale renourishment, but the former dredging is still raw in people's minds. And a $600,000 line item for dredging, they are going to say, "What's going on?" It needs a little bit better explanation. That's my thoughts anyway. MR. HOVELL: Do you want me to move on to Barefoot Beach dune restoration? The Barefoot Beach Club has recently submitted an application. They -- since Tropical Storm Gabrielle, they have been working either independently or with Coastal Engineering Consultants to come up with a plan to restore their dunes. They applied for the emergency permits. They have the plans in place. They even have the contracts in place and, I believe -- I don't know exactly when the work's going to start, but the grant application indicates that by April 30th of this year they will have done this project. It includes not only trucking sand in but replanting dune vegetation, irrigating them, and repairing some dune walkovers, as well as reimbursement for removing some debris. And it comes to just over $100,000. Having just gotten this in, I haven't had a chance to ask the county attorney for a specific legal opinion, but my previous discussions with the county attorney about picking up debris off of Barefoot Beach are such that I feel fairly confident in saying that currently we are not in a position to prov'id'e TDC funds for what, in essence, is private property. Until there comes a day when we establish an erosion control line or property line between where their property ends and the state property begins and we get easements from them that allow for public maintenance and public access to those areas, I don't feel it would be appropriate to agree to spend the tourist tax dollars. I think longer term it's something that we should probably look at doing. The question would be -- there's a number of political decisions in there, but in the short term I guess I would not recommend that we pursue this application. MR. PIRES: And, Mr. Chairman, on that note also, I guess a couple of concerns or questions and comments on this application. Number. 1, it's called Barefoot Beach Condominiums, and there are a number of them, and there's a master association. There's some issues going on between the master association, and I understand, some other individual property owners' association. There's extensive protracted litigation between the county and the Lely Barefoot Beach organizations over beach access to gatehouse and all that. And one of the points of contention is what control or access is there over the roadways going to the state lands and the county lands at the end of Lely Barefoot Beach Boulevard. And I know that the application states that it's a "highly publicly accessed beach area," but this is about a half-a-mile north I guess, of the county's Barefoot Beach. And, again, coupled with all the other issues that are currently pending, I tend to agree with the staff that this is not an appropriate grant request that should be recommended favorably. In fact, I think it should be recommended not to be approved consistent with the staff recommendation. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Any other comments on this? (No response.) Page 36 MR. HOVELL: And then if we're ready to move to the last one, I would ask Dr. Staiger, since he just brought it in, to go over the last grant application. DR. STAIGER: Yeah. This the one that stemmed from a project that we hactthe bid opening Monday of this week for this Gordon Pass jetty sand tightening project. And the -- what I'm looking at here is -- I'm sorry. On the second page of it, the total amount requested is erroneous. I didn't fill the blank in right if you look at the last page where I've explained this thing. We have a grant from DEP for 50 percent of the cost of this project. We also have a grant from the TDC for $325,000. The low bid for the project was $729,729 or 721, and the engineering cost we have a contract now for that for 80,445. The difference between the 50 percent that we have to provide for the total cost and what we've got granted is 80,083. We have an existing project, which is referred to as Gordon Pass Inlet Management for $129,000. And what we'd like to do is simply apply 80,000 of that $129,000 grant to the sand tightening project so we can award this contract. It's going to go to City Council for contract award next Wednesday. We're going to request that council consider it as an added agenda item because we just opened the bids the last couple days ago. We could'n'{ get it on the agenda regular term. But the reason we're pushing this is that we need to get the first couple of hundred feet of this project started because it's working on the beach. Once that initial 150 to 200 feet is under construction, the rest of the project can be done from a barge. So if we can get the contractor started by the week after next or so, then he should be able to do the inshore part of it before the end of April, and we won't be working in turtle season on the beach. If we can't get it started that fast, then we end up with the inshore portion not be able to do it until next November. The total estimated time period to do this whole thing is 120 days, so if we get it started on the beach in late March, we should be able to have it finished by next fall. And part of the reason we like to do that, as well, is the Corps of Engineers is supposed to start dredging Gordon Pass in September, and we'd like to have this jetty sand tightened before they start, so when they put the sand to the south on the Key Island Beach it doesn't start washing back through the jetty into the pass. So it's kind of a -- we're trying to coordinate this project with the Corps' dredging project. But these monies are already granted. We have a tourism agreement for this $325,000. We have this other grant for the $129,000 that we've not used. So what we're asking is for your permission to take 80,000 of the 129 and stick it over into the jetty sand tightening project. It's not new money; it's rearranging money that's already granted several years ago. But in order to do this appropriately, we need to to come through the Coastal Advisory Committee and then go to TDC, and then the Board of County Commissioners. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Are there any questions on that? MR. ROELLIG: I was going to make a motion to approve that request because it is -- I agree with Dr. Staiger; it would be very unwise to do the dredging and then do the Page 37 sand tightening after that. MR. KROESCHELL: I'll second that one. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. We have a motion by Mr. Roellig, and NIr. Kroeschell seconded it. I just wanted to ask for edification. The reference to the existing grant of 325,000 is that -- I don't see it on our ten-year list. If it's not there, is that because the grant was made prior to fiscal '02? DR. STAIGER: Yes. MR. HOVELL: Yes, that's correct. And if I could interject, this -- it is an approved grant application. It's on your status sheet that I passed out on, I think, page 4 of the City of Naples pages. I'm sure you can find it on there. As far as procedurally, in essence, the city is asking for more money under that same project. And from that aspect I would recommend that we pick a nice round number because, you know, there might be other minor changes that occur to the process. So 85,000, 90,000, 100,000, whatever, pick a number to cover the $80,000 that they need to get the contract awarded. Procedurally, though, the county will decide how best to do the budget amendments to make~ this happen. We won't necessarily need to take it from one city project and move it to another. If there's a city project with excess funds, at some appropriate point we'll recapture those into reserves. If there's a city project with -- such as this one -- with a need that gets approved for more funds, we'll pull those probably out of reserves and/or do it in conjunction with the budget amendment taking away from another project. So I wouldn't necessarily look for you to, you know, agree with all the funding mechanisms, just do you agree with, you know, the price increase, and how much money do we want to budget for it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think that's our role, but it's a valuable point to note that the net effect of all this -- because either we have or will withdrawal that request that the Army Corps is going to cover. The net effect is that there's a lowering of the amount of committed funds once it all washes through. MR. HOVELL: If I could make one other point before you get onto voting. We did get an e-mail from Mr. Boggus concerning an article that at least appeared in the electronic version of the Naples Daily News; I didn't find it in the paper version. The title is "Army Corps Halts Beach Renourishment to Fund War Effort," and the implication being that if they've diverted that kind of money towards the, quote-unquote, war effort, then I'm not sure if anybody's gone back and double-checked that the Corps still has the funds to do the Gordon Pass dredging this summer. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: What's the date of that article? MR. HOVELL: Thursday, March 14th. MR. ROELLIG: I didn't see that. DR. STAIGER: That was in reference to Martin County Beach renovation project, which the Corps was funding, but the Gordon Pass thing is a congressional add-on Page 38 March 15, 2002 1 ~ J directly from Porter Goss into the budget, and those tend to be, I think, something that are a litfie bit less capable of being -- MR. ROELLIG: I haven't seen the wording, but if Congress has directed it, the administration signed the bill, then I've never seen a case where they could take the money back without Congress's okay, which seems very cumbersome for this particular size of project. So I wouldn't be overly concerned about that, but it certainly should be checked out. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions at this time? We've had these four other items, and there have been questions and/or doubts about a couple of them at least. So why don't we vote on them individually and in order. The first one we discussed as an added item is --. MR. KROESCHELL: What are we going to do with the motion on the floor? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have a motion? I didn't catch it if there is. What is the motion? MR. PIRES: I think that was up t'o the last for the City of Naples. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, we can take the fourth first if someone wants to second it then. I didn't realize we had a motion. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We have a motion by Mr. Roellig, seconded by Mr. Kroeschell on the City of Naples proposal for Gordon Pass. All those in favor say aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Aye. MR. ROELLIG: Aye. MR. SNEDIKER: Aye. MR. STAKICH: Aye. MR. KROESCHELL: Aye. MR. PIRES: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Passes 6 to 0. MR. HOVELL: If I could be clear then, we're to write into the budget for the exact amount requested, $80,083 ? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Actually, we didn't cover that adequately, and maybe we should make that clear. I think it's just advisable and common sense to round it. MR. SNEDIKER: I think Ron requested up to 90,000 just in case there's additional funds -- additional funds needed. MR. HOVELL: Well, had I had the opportunity to comment to Jon on this prior to the meeting, I would have asked him to round it up to some other number. So if I could ask somebody to pick a number and then have you recommend that, I'll be happy to Page 39 16J March 15, 2002 recommend that on up the TDC and BCC line. MR. SNEDIKER: Want to use the $90,000 number then? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. '~ MR. SNEDIKER: Gives you some flexibility if necessary. MR. ROELLIG: If we have to amend the motion, I'm willing to do that. DR. STAIGER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think it will be clear from the record.~ MR. ROELLIG: All right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Now we have the beach emergency response plan for $25,000. ~ MR. KROESCHELL: I move acceptance of that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Motion by Mr. Kroeschell. MR. ROELLIG: I'll second that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Second by Mr. Roellig. All in favor say aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Aye. MR. ROELLIG: Aye. MR. SNEDIKER: Aye. MR. STAKICH: Aye. MR. KROESCHELL: Aye. MR. PIRES: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Passes 6 to 0. Next, we had -- am I doing it in the correct order? -- county-wide sand search or am I out of order now? I guess we're all in -- well, that one we had discussion, and I guess perhaps if there's a consensus that we don't want to -- I don't know if we have a consensus. We've had at least two comments that 600,000 is too much to recommend right off the bat without knowing more. We talked about a smaller amount that might be wisely spent in a budget year. MR. SNEDIKER: On the couple of these where we still have questions, are we going to have another meeting before the TDC meeting? Correct? In early April? I guess it's not confirmed yet, but if we do have another meeting, maybe we can get more information on a couple of these projects by then. MR. KROESCHELL: I think that would make sense. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Stakich, you were going to say something? MR. STAKICH: I was going to say, 600,000 you know, if we approve it, it's only a budget item. We're not allocating -- we're not spending the money. That gives us time -- if we approve it now time for a rem -- gives us time for the engineers and our staff to come back to us to say -- don't forget, we still have to approve any contract that they issue. So we still have control over it. All we're doing here is allocating or budgeting the 600,000. We're not spending the line. Page 40 So I personally would say go ahead and budget the money, pass it as a budget item knowing that we have control later on when the details come out for how the money is to be spent and what the bids are going to be. .~ MR. PIRES: I guess there's a question, will we see anything subsequent in time? In other words, if the county were to go out and do request for proposals for the scope of work, would they come back before this board for recommendation to the County Commission as to whether to award that contract to that entity? MR. HOVELL: First, let me answer a different question. I'm almost positive the TDC meets on Monday, April 1 st. So, no, we will not have another meeting between now and then CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I believe it's April 15th. MR. HOVELL: Has it been set as the 15th then? Okay. To more directly answer your question, though, we can make the process whatever you want. I understand your level of discomfort with it. I hope you can also appreciate, though, how cumbersome it is as staff to try and do things in the budget outside of a normal process. And so I appreciate Mr. Staldch's comments as far as approving a budget and let's see if we can't control it'tlirough some other process other than the budget process. What I could offer is, you know, whether it was the 600,000 or some smaller amount that got us started. In either case, if you wanted to specifically have the engineer at a future meeting, you know, and you can ask them directly the questions and/or look at a report first that they have or what have you, or for that matter review the scope even before we sign a work order. I'd be happy to do any of those things. We don't want to turn this into something that, you know, you approve now and then never see again. The second thing to be aware of is any individual work order under the professional engineering contracts, any work order that exceeds $90,000 has to go in front of the board as a specific approval item. So if we were to attempt to do one $600,000 work order, it would clearly go before the board. MR. PIRES: Would it come before this board, though, for recommendation review to the County Commission? MR. HOVELL: Not typically, though. MR. PIP_ES: And I think that's where some of the discomfort -- the level of comfort decreases with this committee if we have that ability to do that, and I'm not sure that's the scope. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And all those comments are correct, and as Mr. Stakich pointed out, budgeting a certain amount is a lot different than spending. And there would be all the approvals and checks and balances, but implicit in throwing 600,000 or whatever number into this plan is a policy recommendation -- at least this is how I feel -- it's a policy recommendation by us that we should be doing this very intensive wide ranging sand source search. And the answer may well be that's what we should be doing, but I don't think we can just get it this afternoon and say that's what we Page 41 16 d should be doing. We're ldnd of recommending a policy decision. We have to go a little to the side on our meeting schedules when we're talking about future meeting schedules, I think, in a more general sense later on in this meeting. But when we had our last workshop on March 1 st, we weren't aware of the Friday afternoon issue being a problem, but we did discuss the fact that if we felt we needed one more meeting before the TDC without -- we could always call some sort of special meeting -- there was time that we could meet in another two weeks or so. And the TDC meeting is April 15th; that I know. So we could have another meeting, and I think it wouldn't necessarily have to be a long meeting. Clearly, we're getting a lot done today, but a couple of these stickier items -- including a presentation on this 600,000. My gut instinct is you know what you're doing, and we can understand when you need a sand source search it's probably the right thing to recommend and the right amount even, but we can't understand that today -- or at least I can't. MR. PIRES: I think you summed it up nicely as far as my approach also there. I think the committee as a whole agrees it's a wise approach to do the far ranging sand source, but the scope of it after that is bes, o~nd us right now. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So we can get into meeting specifically a little bit later, but two Fridays from now, even if we can't get all nine, I would hope that we have a -- MR. PIRES: I think that's Good Friday. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. We'll work it out. Let's just in principle agree that some of these stickier ones we may revisit in two weeks. MR. PIRES: So this won't be continued until the next meeting, the one on the sand source? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: To me that would be the best course if that's consensus. MR. SNEDIKER: I think Ron suggested that maybe we have the engineer come to the meeting --. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yes. MR. SNEDIKER: -- and get a presentation from him as to what exactly he plans to do with five, six -hundred thousand dollars. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Right. Because, again, Mr. Stakich is correct, but then these things -- once they are in the budget, you tend not to prune things back. The third on our list was Hideaway Beach in keeping things straight. Pardon me, Barefoot Beach. MR. HOVELL: Barefoot Beach. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And we had had some discussion on that and I' believe a recommendation from staff that it was not appropriate at this time. If we don't have any further questions or comments, we can take a motion on that. MR. PIRES: I would recommend that we forward that request for Barefoot Beach 1 Page 42 dune restoration to the Board of County Commissioners or TDC for recommendation of denial on that application. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have a second on that? MR. KROESCHELL: I'll second that one. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Motion by Mr. Pires, second by Mr. Kroeschell. All those in favor say aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Aye. MR. ROELLIG: Aye. MR. SNEDIKER: Aye. MR. STAKICH: Aye MR. KROESCHELL: Aye. MR. PIRES: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Passes 6 to 0. Now, we are down to the Hideaway Beach issue that Mr. Roellig --. MR. KROESCHELL: One thing,~Mr. Chairman. We pulled four items off the earlier -- are we going to take these four items that we didn't do anything with? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, that's what I was just referring to, the Hideaway Beach item, which I think is something of -- more than substance. It's important for treatment and consistency. The suggestion was -- the value of that project I don't think is in question. The suggestion was going back to the 100,000; it's supposed to be treated the same as other projects of that nature; is that fight? MR. ROELLIG: Right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have any questions or comments on that issue? MR. KROESCHELL: It makes sense. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Can we have a motion? MR. KROESCHELL: I move we adopt that for $100,000. MR. ROELLIG: I'll second that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Motion by Mr. Kroeschell, second by Mr. Roellig -- MR. SNEDIKER: Can we add in there that 50,000 is a contingency item, which is detailed on the last page, is what we are pulling out? MR. ROELLIG: Oh, good. MR. KROESCHELL: That's fight. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. The motion should be clarified that way. Questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: All those in favor say aye. Page 43 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: MR. ROELLIG: Aye. MR. SNEDIKER: Aye. MR. STAKICH: Aye. MR. KROESCHELL: Aye. MR. PIRES: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: (No response.) Aye. Opposed? March 15' 20021 6 J 1 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Passes 6 to 0. I had forgotten the $9,000 City of Naples. I think this is before you came in, Dr. Staiger. We didn't have any objections to the substance of that proposal, but I think Mr. Hovell was saying that it could be handled now without a funding request. DR. STAIGER: Yeah, that's fine. I just thought this one up when I was putting the other ones together because the beach cleaning equipment doesn't really deal with these derelict structures, and I thought unless we had another way to do it, that in some cases we end up with -- after storms some of the -- especially in the wood structures that are south of the Naples Pier shed timber'wlth big spikes sticking out of it and things like that. And it would be nice to be able to get down there and pull that stuff off the beach. Sometimes it ends up just drifting up and washing up into the dune system, and we may or may not even know about it. That's what it's all about is sort of removal of that kind of material on it on an as-needed basis. If we can cover that some other way, it's no problem. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And, Mr. Hovell, you're saying we have a contingency or something in this year's TDC money that can be directed to that purpose? MR. HOVELL: Yes. I feel that project 10509, which was approved for $195,000, includes items such as this, which were written in as contingencies for getting out there and doing various debris removal and whatnot on the beach. And we have a standing contract with Lightener Contracting that includes both laborers and things like backhoes and dump trucks and whatnot that we pay on an hourly basis. So I think we have the budget and the contracts in place to accommodate this as long as it's, you know, within an area that we typically go and maintain and have a permit to maintain. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So then and how we handle this -- I assume perhaps that Dr. Staiger simply on behalf of the city withdraw the request; is that correct? MR. HOVELL: I think that would be appropriate. DR. STAIGER: That's fine. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. That disposes of that. We are Down to the last two, one being beach cleaning operations. If we have determined as a group that whenever we hold a meeting we should have a meeting before the TDC meeting on April 15th, does the committee feel that we should make a determination on this today or ponder it a little bit further and make that determination at our next meeting? Page 44 solid waste MR. MR. MR. 16 J SNEDIKER: When do we think we could have this -- what do you call it -- disposal report or something? ANDERSON: Probably in a couple of weeks. .~- SNEDIKER: Our next meeting will probably be in three weeks. ANDERSON: Three weeks. MR. SNEDIKER: Is that feasible? I'm assuming. MS. KRAUS: As long as it's not the first week of April. MR. SNEDIKER: That would be the first week of April. MS. KRAUS: We have the International Sea Turtle Symposium the frrst week of April, so we wouldn't be able to do anything till after that or before that. MR. SNEDIKER: I'm guessing that'd be April 5. You will not be here; is that what you're saying? MS. KRAUS: No. There won't be any sea turtle people here. MR. SNEDIKER: Do we need -- do we need the sea turtle people? All we really want to see is what percentage of it is stone, which is rocks, which is Pepsi bottles. MR. KROESCHELL: I think the'gfiy we need is A1 Marsten. MS. KRAUS: Yeah. I don't know if you could get a good enough sample by that time. We were hoping to work with the Conservancy and getting a, you know, couple months study out of this with their beach survey that we're currently conducting and also with the sampling. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: One other possible route --. MR. SNEDIKER: Just hold off on it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: One other possible route, I think we've agreed as a group that it's wisest to leave this line item in and then determine in the future how and if it might be spent. We might do that, and if the committee would authorize, for example, that I would write a letter on behalf of the committee just pointing out -- not trying to make a decision, because that's premature, but pointing out that we have these questions. We understand there's a philosophical issue and there are environmental questions, etc., and just pointing to the TDC amendment commissioners that while we're leaving this in the budget, we feel we have significant further work to do on how wise it is to approach this. MR. SNEDIKER: Sounds like a good suggestion. MR. STAKICH: I like that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Dr. Staiger. DR. STAIGER: It might be appropriate for a -~ some discussion at City Council workshop to get a feel from council as to what they think would be an appropriate intensity of cleaning on the Naples beach that could be then brought back to the advisory committee and the TDC, because I know that Marco Island has an existing beach management plan which has been in place since they did the beach restoration in 1990. And that calls for cleaning, but we don't have anything like that in the city, and we've Page 45 March 15, 2002 kind of gone with the flow of the program, and it may be something that council would want to talk about, see if they can get some consensus. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think probably City Council's role in that would be important. That could come in in that discussion phase that I think we'll be doing even while this line item's in the budget. If that approach is agreeable to everyone, then maybe we can have a motion on that. MR. SNEDIKER: I'll make a motion to have you write the letter just described. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: To approve this grant request. MR. SNEDIKER: Yes, along with that letter -- an addendum to that grant request. MR. ROELLIG: I'll second that. MR. GALLEBERG: Motion by Mr. Snediker, second by Mr. Roellig. All those in favor say aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Aye. MR. ROELLIG: Aye. MR. SNEDIKER: Aye. MR. STAKICH: Aye. MR. KROESCHELL: Aye. MR. PIRES: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That passes 6 to 0. We are down now to the last item in terms of our grants to the Goodland canals dredging design and permitting proposal. MR. PIRES: I know in this one I understand Mr. Stakich was -- correct me if I'm wrong, Bob -- you're thinking that possibly staff would come back or the proponents could come back with greater detail so we could have a better factual basis to make a recommendation. I'm not necessarily right now in favor of this application because I think it is more privately oriented and away from the scope of what we're inclined to do and based upon what Ron and Jon, Dr. Staiger, were saying. But I think that's what --. Bob, you were indicating at least give it another shot if they come back with greater detail? MR. STAKICH: Well, first of all, we have to fmd out if it's legal. MR. PIRES: And if we're going to find out if it's legal, we're going to have another meeting anyways to discuss -- I think that may be the approach to have this considered when we have our next meeting to consider the other application, the sand source. MR. SNEDIKER: We might want to have the people from Goodland who made the application here, too, to answer any questions. But I'd like to see a detailed map of exactly, you know, which waterways, which canals are they talking about. MR. KROESCHELL: If there's aspect of being legal. If it's illegal then we don't Page 46 MR. SNEDIKER: Then forget it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: If someone wants to make the motion, then why don't we -- just so we have clarity on the record, we have this item and the $600,000 beach item that's we'll address the next meeting and I don't THINK we continued the other one. If we did then I, perhaps, forgot that. We can just have a motion to continue those two items to the next meeting. MR. KROESCHELL: So moved. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Kroeschell's made the motion. MR. ROELLIG: Second CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Roellig has the second. All those in favor say CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: MR. ROELLIG: Aye. MR. SNEDIKER: Aye. MR. STAKICH: Aye. MR. KROESCHELL: Aye. MR. PIRES: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: (No response.) Aye. Opposed? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Passes 6 to 0. Okay. That is a lot of good work, I think. We have next on our agenda the ten-year plan. MR. HOVELL: Okay. Let me see if -- let me see if I can put this on the overhead screen if it's going to make any sense. I also have it on the computer, but I'd just get a sense of whether or not -- yeah, I think even if I did that up on the screen on the computer I don't think you'd be able to make anymore heads or tails of it than you can up there so ... (Mr. Pires leaves the meeting.) MR. HOVELL: I guess we'll just refer to the paper copies we have in front of us. I did bring a computer version if anybody wanted me to do some "what-if" scenarios to see how things might be affected. But I'll start by saying that the changes to this version as compared to the version that we had at the last workshop -- you know, I took the comments and tried to take most of the comments that were made at the last workshop and incorporate them into the one that I mailed to you, such as changing the timing on -- let's see, where did it go -- the Doctor's Pass dredging, those every-four-year events were both moved out to the right one year as previously suggested because of the late finish of the last go around. I have also tried to add in some things that I had submitted as grant applications, both -- you'll notice in the fiscal year 2002 column under Item C, that top line there has 625,000. That's the countywide sand search and the $25,000 emergency response plan. And then the other big changes are I did get some input from the office of budget on how Page 47 1 6 J to do the annual increase amounts for the revenue. Seemed like there was another major -- oh, and under Category G, the reserves, the catastrophe fund. In essence, per our discussion, if we're going to view that as an accumulating pot, that would be above and beyond the general reserves, which are more on this spreadsheet reflected in the carry forward line. The most recent month tourist tax revenues that we have received into the Category A fund was approximately 88 percent of the same time period from last year. The current budget office guidance to be conservative recommended that we take the year-to-date percentage, which is just under 82 percent, and apply that to the total of last year's collections and make that the projection for this year. And when you do that math, it comes out to about $5.2 million, so that's why I've shown the $5.2 million in revenue in fiscal year 2002. (Mr. Pti:es returns to meeting.) All future years that -- at this point all they've been able to offer since they don't set policy anymore than the current year and the future budget year, when they get to that point, which they've not yet, all they could offer is to look at the historical trends of the increase and to take the conservative nuiZnl~er and just apply that. So the historical trend has been roughly 6 percent or slightly under. And so starting in 2003 and all future years I escalated it by 5 percent. I also got the input from them on what the current projections are for the interest income, and so I put that down as the 4.9 percent. And so when you take all the things that we've previously talked about as far as the recurring nature of the dredging or the annual beach maintenance or whatnot, put them all on this sheet, the biggest expenditure year comes in 2006 when we do both the major renourishment project and parks and recs has in their longer term plan to put in for a major project. And that causes the fiscal year 2002 carryforward number to dip down to $1.3 million. So that's kind of the number I kept looking at when I would run any different scenarios to see if that number drops into a negative number. Then you start to wonder if we need to change the plan or not. MR. KROESCHELL: And what is the 3 million-reimbursement office? Do all three. MR. HOVELL: Well, we have a project agreement with the state for $1.4 million, but as far as timing of that, my expectation is that that will take about two or three or even four years to both spend the money and seek reimbursement from the state. We also expect to get about $2.4 million from FEMA. And I anticipate that between the money we're spending this year or the money that we would spend early next fiscal year starting on November 1 st when we truck sand to Park Shore and Vanderbilt again, that we will recover the beaches and apply for all of our FEMA money next year. And I'm, at least in this spreadsheet, showing that we would receive it all next year. ~ CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I don't think we can approve this today because we have the two items that we're going to make a determination next year, and they would be reflected on the '03 column. But given where we are today, does anyone have any Page 48 questions or comments on this? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: This, too, I think will make final determinatiorronce we know where we are on those two remaining items which total 750,000, so they could affect this significantly. Or are you saying that -- oh, you did say the 625 in '02 includes the 600,000 that we're going to -- there's still no particular reason to approve this now. But we should approve it after we've done all the grants. MR. HOVELL: And, actually, depending on what our meeting schedule is, you know, I know it's in the committee's charter to have a ten-year plan, and I know at some point the state asks for a long-range plan so that they can take a look at what they might cost share with us. But at this point I have no specific due dates for anything related to a ten-year plan. I thought it would just be something good to include as we go forward to the TDC and the Board of County Commissioners to say that we have something that is either pretty close or an approved plan so that we can see that we're not just looking at what kind of money we're going to spend next year, but that we have things lined up, and it looks like, you know, everything will work out. I think for purposes of when we db ~et a specific request from the state on what their timeline is in asking for a long-range plan, you know, I would want to use the most current information available. And if the budget office, you know -- even after you approve, if the budget office sets a policy that might change something in here or we get some other formal action that might change something in here, I would like to think the appropriate thing to do is update it and submit it to the state when it's called for. So perhaps for purposes of your discussions, since you intend to have another meeting before the TDC meeting on April 15th, then perhaps the thing to do is approve it, at least at that point in time, for presentation to the TDC. And then when it goes -- when all these grant applications and the ten-year plan go before the Board of County Commissioners, if there's no other policy changes, it would be the same ten-year plan. If there are some changes, then I would update it and submit it, and it would be somewhat of a living document, and I would continually come back to you and show you how the different things we're doing affect the ten-year plan. I recall when I was relatively new here Mr. Strapponi asking that very question as we were doing some grant applications out of cycle. Well, how does this affect the ten- year plan, and at the time I didn't have a clue how to answer him because we didn't have - - because we didn't have a ten-year plan, you know, on the computer that I could just plug it in and tell him the answer to that question. So in the future I'll be able to do that. So, no, I don't have a problem continuing it to the next meeting, and whatever the sum of the grant applications that are approved, that would tend to affect either the '02 or the '03 column. I guess I would like to at least have a general consensus that the '04: and out columns seem to be appropriate at this point other than changes in things like the budget guidance I might get or interest rates or things that we don't make the decisions on. Page 49 MR. PIRES: Wouldn't the carryforward, though, be revised depending on what happens with '02 and '03, the carry forward to '04 and '05 would be different. MR. HOVELL: Absolutely the carry forward numbers would change, but I guess - - I mean, in terms of the Categories A through G, the various projects, we don't vote on the parks and recs one, that the various projects are appropriately displayed and timed and, you know, whatever other words you can think of seem to be the fight thing to have in there. For instance, if for some reason -- and I hate to say this at this point, but, you know, the longer I'm here and the more trucking evolutions I try and do, and the question in my mind because the -- just planning on spending a million~dollars every year. I think it's a good thing to have in your hip pocket for something more out of the ordinary than just we happen to have lost 50,000 cubic yards across all of our beaches. If there's not a particular hot spot, I don't necessarily think we should just mn out and do the renourishment. I think longer term I'd like to come up with something that shows the economics of doing the major renoufishments that might be every eight to ten years or whatever the frequency turns out to be ~d~ only doing the trucking evolutions when there's a real specific need in a specific location because I -- not only is it difficult work for me to coordinate, but I find the reaction to trucking, you know, is not overly positive. And it's also relatively expensive compared to a lot of other options, so -- I mean, for now that's in there, but longer term, you know, once we have that analysis and something to be able to show you, you know, that might be a major change we'd want to make to the plan is to have that be viewed as more of a contingency fund, if you will, and then you can get into the philosophical discussion of should we budget for it then, or should we deal with it when and if the situation arises. We certainly have the contracts in place to execute it, but do we need to have the budget in place or not, I think, becomes a good discussion point. So if there are any other items sort of along those lines that you would prefer to change now as opposed to wait for other information --. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, if we have specific change. I think as we go to the out years, for example, where you're talking about with the sand trucking for purposes of right now in the next couple weeks, we ought to be recommending in those out years the status quo, and then after we do the submission we'll be having the policy discussions. MR. HOVELL: Right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We had also brought up at previous meetings putting a public benefit component into some of these requests and saying that's 100 percent, that's 50 percent, etc. We may or may not do that, but that's a policy discussion we can have that may well affect the out years as time passes, but they don't need to affect the out years today, I don't think. Are we all set with that? Dr. Staiger. DR. STAIGER: I'd just like to reinforce what Ron just said. The trucking right 1 Page 50 now is being done to deal with hot spots and also deal with the fact that when we did the restoration six years ago, it was not done to the full extent that it had been anticipated or designed. The project itself was -- in Vanderbilt Beach went the whole length of the design for the project. On Park Shore and the Naples Beach, the project was shortened in order to get it done -- get something done completely within the time we had. And also the actual width of the beach fill was reduced to compensate for the fact that we had this inappropriate material offshore that we didn't want to pump any more of on the beach, and also to get enough sand on the beach to have a reasonable length of beach restored. It was supposed to go to about 21st Avenue South. It ended at about 18th Avenue South going south from here, and the actual width of the beach was cut back way do get all of it done. If we go back in the future (sic), assuming we find an offshore source that's appropriate, and restore the beach again with that kind of dredge and fill operation and do it to a design template that gets as far out as we can without environmental impacts and as far down as we can get within the permit constraints, we might have a beach that would last, before we start developing hot spots, significantly longer. So instead of looking at putting s~in~t on the beach on an annual basis, we may be able to do it far less frequently, which reduces impact the impact of the trucking. And as Ron said, we get a lot of calls from people who don't like it. At Park Shore the fact that there is only one access at Horizon Way for all the trucks, and on the Naples Beach there's only a couple, and if we're doing -- if we do it far enough and well planned enough in advance, and we can get these guys to start the dredging process in the beginning of November and have the permits in place. We didn't get the permits in place for this last one until toward the end of November. The contractor didn't start really, I don't think, until late November to do the restoration. We would have a long enough period of time to get it done right, and, hopefully, if the weather doesn't get really bad, we have an adequate window to get a project done. And it probably would be best to plan for that, and then in the future after that we wouldn't have to go deal with this trucking thing on such a frequent basis. That's a lot of assumptions, but if we plan far enough for it, we've already got the permit for the project, and I don't think getting a permit to renourish restored beach is going to be that difficult. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We would all hope so, and we've done a year -- staff and all of us have done a year of this planning. And it should start to bear fruit, certainly in years two and three. You can't see that much now necessarily, but I think we are putting the pieces in place. Future meeting schedule, Maura Kraus, Ashley Lupo, a couple others have raised the issue that Friday afternoons don't work very well. The constraint we have is that this meeting room isn't available that often. I had Mr. Hovell to look into times that are available. Have you had an opportunity to do that? Maybe what would be best, if it's not cumbersome, to summarize the blocks of Page 51 time that are regularly available and to e-mail or send us that, and we can get back to you about what times don't work, and we'll develop a consensus time that's available and then go forward with that and perhaps address that at the next meeting or the meeting after so we don't collectively say, "I can't do Tuesdays," and "I'm not good on Fridays." We can come in here with a little bit more coherent plan. MR. KROESCHELL: Yeah, if he gives us the dates that are available... CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And if you have our e-mails or addresses if anyone doesn't have it, and then we should all be sure to get back to Mr. Hovell so we can talk about it fruitfully next time. Next would be audience participation. We don't have anyone in the audience who has not spoken, so I think we'll probably be okay. MR. SNEDIKER: Just one more. We took $50,000 out of the Hideaway Beach budget, if you will, for contingency. Ron, do you need that put in some other budget and approved? MR. HOVELL: No. I would just take that out and it would, in essence, go into general reserves. Okay. MR. SNEDIKER: Just so we don*t ~et caught. MR. HOVELL: Mr. Chairman, if I could, though, I will get a more specific schedule from the county manager's office. They schedule this room, but it's not very hard to give you a summary in the near term. Number 1, regularly scheduled meetings, the further out you go, the easier it is to just -- only be dealing with those things that are regularly scheduled, but for the month of April, unfortunately, our penciled in date isn't on their schedule for some reason, so we have no date at this point for April. And the only dates they offered were the afternoon of April 19th or the morning of the 22nd or the 24th. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That clearly doesn't work in terms of this room. We may have to do our April meeting over in that Supervisor of Elections. MR. HOVELL: And then starting in May the only dates that they had that were available then and following months was the mornings of the second Monday, the afternoons of the third Friday, and the mornings of the fourth Wednesday. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Could you say those again? MR. HOVELL: The mornings of the second Monday, the afternoons of the third Friday, and the mornings of the fourth Wednesday, if we're trying to start a new schedule in May. Now, if we just pick -- I'll go get the detailed schedule and mail it to you-all, and maybe what we need to do is just -- I hate to call them random -- but pick dates in April and May and maybe even June. But then try to use July -- let's put our mark in the sand for our regularly attended meetings so that something else doesn't get scheduled there. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. We'll all consider that -- it's good to haVe at least those three for now. For the next meeting, I guess we won't be here, but it's more important to have the meeting, of course. Does April 5th work at 1:30 just to do it one more time at our normal time? Page 52 March 15, 2002I MR. KROESCHELL: What day of the week is that? ·,a, 6J 1 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Friday. MR. PIRES: The only difficulty, I think, is from Maura's perspective. Isn't that the week you're all at the symposium, the sea turtle -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, we only have -- all we're discussing are the sand search and the Goodland canals, neither of which impact you, do they? MR. PIRES: Okay. April 5th then? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Does that work for everyone present? MR. KROESCHELL: At 1:307 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: At 1:30. And Mr. Hovell can inform us where we'll be. Presumably it will be that room at the Supervisor of Elections. Does anyone else have any other comments or points they'd like to bring out? MR. ROELLIG: I have a short one. You know, you talk about trucking, and are you going to have the consultant here at the next meeting? MR. HOVELL: For the 5 April meeting? MR. ROELLIG: Let me see what I'm looking at. If the trucking is a problem, we should have somebody make an analysis' o~ other methods of getting sand to the beach, whether it's by barge -- I presume we could -- I mean, I don't know. (Mr. Stakich leaves meeting.) MR. ROELLIG: You could barge sand down the Caloosahatchee River and pump it out on the beach. And some engineering f'rrm should look at the other methods, so we're not just stuck with tracking because -- and as I said, if you can barge it from somewhere, it tends not to be outlandishly expensive, but we need to have a study of that. MR. HOVELL: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Anyone else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. We will see you again, April 5, 1:30 p.m., and we are adjourned. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 4:30 p.m. COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE GARY GALLEBERG, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY PAMELA HOLDEN, REPORTER Page 53 Flala Carter Henning Coyle Coletta [ RECEIVE[> AU6 2 7 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL AGENDA September 4, 2002 9:00 A.M. Commission Boardroom W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F") - Third Floor I. Roll Call II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of July 3, 2002 Meeting Minutes IV. Old Business V. New Business: LDC Amendments (5 items) VI. Council Member Comments VII. Public Comments VIII. Adjournment Council Members: Please notify the Current Planning Secretary no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 28, 2002 if you cannot attend this meeting or if you have a conflict and will abstain from voting on a petition (403-2400). General Public: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Misc. C0rres: Copies To: July 3, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE County Commission Boardroom Building "F", 3~ Floor 3301 Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34104 9:00 AM 16J MINUTES JULY 3, 2002 Chairman Tom Sansbury called the meeting to order at 9:00 AM. ATTENDANCE: Members: William Hill, Ed Carlson, Thomas Sansbury, Alexandra Santoro, Alfred Gal, and Ken Humiston. Collier County: Stephen Lenberger, Klm Hadley, Ray Bellows, Stan Chrzanowski, July Minor, Marjorie Student, Patrick White, and Maura Krauss. -Michael Coe, Erica Lynne, and Sorrel had excused absences. II III APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Ed Carlson moved to approve the agenda, it was then seconded by Alexandra Santoro; it passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Ed Carlson moved to approve the minutes of the June 5, 2002 meeting of the EAC, it was then seconded by Alexandra Santoro; it passed unanimously. IV Land Use Petitions A) Special Treatment Permit No. ST-2194 "Center Point" Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East -Patrick White swore in all those who were testifying. Speakers: 1) Ray Bellows, planning services, presented the planning overview for this petition. -Mr. Bellows stated the site was located on the NE section of Collier Blvd and US 41 -The site was zoned C3 and has an STE overlay -The petitioner is requesting to construct an 11,200-sq. ft. drugstore and a 260-seat restaurant. -Since this is not a PUD, the ST issues cannot be addressed through the normal PUD requirements, this petition is to remove the ST permitting process of the zoning map. -The site is located in the urban residential district (this was a correction of the staff report) -The site is located in Activity Center #18, this allows for commercial uses 2) Stephen Lenberger, planning services, -Site is 4.02 acres in Size (Visual used to show site), Collier Blvd (County Rd. 951) is on the West side of the property, US 41 is on the Southern side of the property 1 Page 1 -Currently there is a fruit stand on the corner of the property, the Western -2/3 of the site is cleared, the eastern portion is a forested Wetland (contains: Cypress, Oak, & Red Maple) -The site is an ST permit, if this petition is approved it will allow development in it, rather than removing the ST overlay (Mr. Lenberger made a correction to the statements of Mr. Bellows) -Jurisdictional wetlands total ~ 1.3 acres of the site and located in the Eastern portion of the property -Mr. Lenberger stated that the petitioner wishes to impact most of this and has paid off- site mitigation to Panther Island Mitigation Bank for 1.86 credits -The petitioner is required to retain 10% of native vegetation ( 0.18 acres); the native vegetation is the forested Wetland on the Eastern portion and -1/2 acre of Pine Oak & Cabbage Palm on the Northern portion -Retention area will be left at existing grade (-0.23 acres or 13%) of the native vegetation -No listed species were observed -Mr. Lenberger reviewed the regulations and intent of the ST overlay; "directed towards the conservation, protection, and preservation of the ecological and recreational values .... These areas include but are not necessarily limited to mangrove and fresh water swamps, barrier islands, hardwood hammocks...and lands and structures of historical significance. The purpose of this overlay designation is to assure the preservation and the maintenance of these environmental and cultural resources and to encourage their preservation and at the same time to permit those types of development..." He also read a paragraph pertaining to the ST establishment section: "the overlay district classification is used for those lands of environmental sensitivity and historical and archeological significance when the essential ecological and cultural value of the land is not adequately protected under the basic zoning regulations established by code or ordinance." -Mr. Lenberger stated that they do not feel that an 82% impact to the wetlands on site is in accordance with the code, they also feel it may be inconsistent with policy 6.2 & 6.47 of the Growth Management Plan -Mr. Carlson questioned if these were recent and hard-fast jurisdictional lines -Mr. Lenberger replied that the Water Management District has already permitted the project and that they are hard-fast jurisdictional lines. -Mr. Sansbury questioned if there were Malucca on the grounds -Mr. Lenberger replied that there were some in the interior and some Brazilian Pepper on the fringe of the grounds -Mr. Hill questioned the staff report statement that the site was already impacted due to the construction of the Falling Waters project neighboring this site -Mr. Lenberger replied yes, but he would not label this as permanent impact -Mr. Hill and Mr. Lenberger clarified that the impact on this site (which was being spoken of) are secondary impacts from the Falling Waters Project, and that there would be a minor impact on the Northern portion due to this site plan. 3) Tony Pierce, with the law firm of Woodward, Pierce, and Lombardo, here on behalf of the petitioner. -Mr. Pierce requested that Re-Anne Boylan be declared an expert in the area of environmental science, environmental engineering, wetlands, estuary, and ecology, vegetation and habitat mapping, environmental impact assessment, environmental Page 2 restoration and mitigation, hydrology, and land use planning. Mr. Pierce places her resume into the record. (A copy of Re-Anne Boylan's resume was not given to the court reporter) -Coastal Management element 6.2 states that "there should be no unacceptable net loss of "viable" naturally functioning marine and fresh water wetland." -Policy 6.2.10 states "any development activity within a viable naturally functioning wetland, not part of a continuous flow-way, shall be mitigated in accordance with South Florida Water Management District rules" -Mr. Pierce stated that there is secondary impact from the Falling Waters project and that the current project therefore is unable to be a "Viable" wetland. Also, he stated that it is not part of a continuous flow-way due to the previously mentioned activity. This has been mitigated in accordance with South Florida Water Management District Rules. -Mr. Pierce makes the Water Management Permit part of the record. He also submitted a letter (dated June 5, 2002) that was submitted to the staff and had the data of permits and mitigation listed. (A copy of the letter and a copy of the permit were not given to the court reporter) -Information in the letter included: advisement's of biologists and environmental consultants that the drainage used has been severed by past developments in the projects vicinity, that Falling Water's secondary impacts to the site required that the site follow mitigation rules, it also included the fact that South Florida Water Management District determined that this site is no longer a viable wetland functioning system due to secondary impacts. -All being considered, Mr. Pierce requested approval of this ST Petition. -Mr. Pierce made the site photograph part of the record. (A copy of the photo was not given to the court reporter) 4) Re-Anne Boylan, president of Boylan Environmental Consultants, gave a little background on her experience. She has a degree in biology from Stetson University 1979, Masters of Environmental Engineering Sciences from the University of Florida in 1982, worked for the Department of Environmental Protection, also worked for the South Florida Water Management District, in 1989 she established her company, and she stated that she has been doing this work in South Florida for over 20 years and that she has been qualified as an expert in numerous administrative and court proceedings. -Mr. Hill moves that Re-Anne Boylan be accepted as an environmental expert, Carlson seconded the motion, all were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. -Re-Anne Boylan reviewed the site map and the adjacent properties, she then places a copy of South Florida Water Management staff report of December 21, 1999 into the record (A copy of this report was not given to the court reporter). She stated that Falling Waters had wetlands in proximity of their wetlands, these were determined as candidates for impact and off site mitigation was appropriate. -During the Permitting process of Falling Waters, the secondary impacts on the wetlands of the Center Point site had to be mitigated for. On page 7 of the staff report it estimated, that a functional assessment of this five-acre wetland will lose 20% of its value or the equivalent of 1 acre of impact. -Re-Anne Boylan stated that this shows the site is getting no water from the north at this point in time. She stated that there is no in-flow from the West, and that the wetlands does extend into the East (off-site) but there still is no water from the Falling Waters Project that flows into these wetlands. Page 3 i -She stated that somewhere in the staff report, it is indicated that the Henderson weir canal controls the US 41 canal at five (dry season) and 3 and 1/2 (wet season), which is not conducive to wetland preservation. -The elevation in the wetland is 3 and ¥2 and then goes up at higher elevations in the fill areas. -She feels that the hydrology of the system was compromised by the Falling Waters project and is out of the control of the applicant, and that it cannot be maintained at this point. -She maintains that the applicant cannot be responsible for this wetland preservation because due to outside activities this site no longer contains a viable wetland system. She refers to an excerpt from the South Florida Water Management District staff report for Center Point, the permit was issued October 11, 2001, On Page 5 of staff report that the district indicated that on site preservation was not feasible in the long term. -Mr. Carlson asked what future water depths were in the proposed reserve area. Re-Anne deferred to the engineer as to depths in the actual wetland itself and that they had provided mitigation for all of the wetlands on the site. -Mr. Carlson stated that there was a dual purpose, the retention area was also the preserve area. He also stated he believed that there would be substantial surface water because of elevation and controlled structure on Henderson Creek. He believes that there could be a viable wetland. He wanted the Hydrologist to elaborate on the future water levels in the preserve area. He doesn't see that if the district claimed this as jurisdiction wetlands, how it is possible that they don't avoid these wetlands saying that they cannot avoid them and must go to mitigation. He also has an issue that mitigation banks were not established to buy your way out of avoidance. -Re-Anne Boylan stated that the district felt that this was not a practical case for preservation and mitigation is due to long-term preservation is outside of the control of the permitee. -Mr. Sansbury clarified for the record that Panther Island Mitigation Bank was mentioned and that the principles of the firm in which he is employed are also the principles of the firm which is a partner to Panther Island Mitigation Bank, yet in no way is he involved or profit from Panther Island Mitigation Bank and does not feel there is any conflict with his involvement in this discussion or voting on this item. -Re-Anne Boylan enters the district staff report for Center Point into the record (A copy of this report was not given to the court reporter). 5) Mike Landy, of Landy Engineering represented the petitioner. -Stated the project was required to water management under a 25yr/3day-storm plan -Existing grades of the wetlands are in the 5.2 range and he expects them to go up 3.5 feet and then bleed down a couple days after (This would be a major storm event) -They established a controlled elevation at 5.0, the controlled elevation at Falling Waters is 3.5 -He would not expect standing water in the dry retention area, but after rains similar to the recent ones he would expect it to be a little muddy, he feels that this project would isolate the hydrology and help the system they are preserving Page 4 -Mr. Sansbury questioned if there was anyway to complete this project without placing a burm near property lines, and on the next neighboring project do the same, so that a viable area could be preserved. Mr. Landy stated he did not know the answer to this. -Mr. Carlson asked Mr. Lenberger if he had been on the site, Mr. Lenberger stated he has. Mr. Carlson then asked, based on the natural indicators what is the wet season water level, pre-construction. Mr. Lenberger replied, "I can't tell you, I know the answer to that question, I did ask the applicant to provide that" what they came back with was the information with the control elevations, because they did not shoot elevations for the wet season water table. Mr. Carlson and Mr. Lenberger agree that this is important information and that it should be seen. -Alfred Gal asked if the project was still viable if forty parking spaces were not created. It was determined that the project was not viable less forty parking spaces. -It was re-stated that along with Re-Anne Boylan's opinion, it is not believed that the petition was inconsistent with 6.2, 6.2.1, 6.4, 6.4.7 and that they are comply with requirements of the land development code. -Re-Ann Boylan then stated that they are not inconsistent with 6.2, 6.2.10, 6.4, and 6.4.7. She stated that she does not agree with staff that they are inconsistent with 6.4.7 because they are looking at the project in the long term. -There was no public comment. -Mr. Hill stated that it is unclear to him if the opinion stated by Mr. White in a memorandum to Miss Murray is the same at this time. Mr. White stated that his opinion stands and' that is the reason for this hearing that rather it would have been an administrative review only. -Alexandra Santoro asked Stephen Lenberger to clarify his position. He stated that they believe it is a viable wetland, that there is hydrology there, and that this will be viable. -Mr. Hill's concern is that they are chopping away at a wetland piece by piece and that he saw no secondary impact from Falling Waters, and if this is approved the next neighboring site will have the same claim and they will lose the whole six acres. -Mr. Hill made a motion for staff to be recognized as an expert in all the same respects as Re-Anne Boylan. It was seconded by Alexandra Santoro, all were in favor, it passed unanimously. -Mr. Carlson made a motion to support the recommendation of staff and recommend denial of this project, it was seconded by Alexandra Santoro, all were in favor, it passed unanimously. -Mr. Hill stated his vote was based on the same questions Mr. Carlson had in respect to the hydrology of the land. At 10:15 AM a five-minute break was taken. B) Planned Unite Development No. PUDZ-2002-AR-2491 Page 5 July 3, 2002 16J "Arrowhead PUD" Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East Section 6, Township 47 South, Range 29 East -Patrick White swore in all those who were testifying. -Mr. Hummiston declares that he has a disclosure and in accordance has filled out the 8-B form due to his contractual arrangement with Turrell & Associates and that he will be participating in the discussion but will refrain from voting. A) Ray Bellows, planning services, stated that the petition was an "Arrowhead amendment to the PUD". .The site is located on the South side of Trafford Road, -1 mile west of state route 29, -1 mile east of Lake Trafford -The PUD is 307 acres, currently approved for 900 residential units, it also allows for mobile homes, and 15 acres of commercial use that allow for -130,680 gross lease-able floor area. -The proposed amendment will eliminate the mobile home uses, will re-configure the commercial tract, modify the mix between single and multi family, and increase the total number of dwelling units. .(Immokalee Future Land Use Map was used to show the subject sight): Two land use classifications: 1) 259 acres located in the low residential district, eligible for a density of 4 units per acre and would allow for a maximum 1,036 units; 2) allows for a mix of commercial and residential uses, maximum density of 12 units per acre, 33 acres of this project located in this area which would allow for an additional 400 dwelling units -Petitioner requests that the density is consistent with the density allowed by the Immokalee area master plan and staff has also deemed this consistent with the Immokalee master plan B) Kim Hadley, planning services, stated that the majority of the project site is pasture for grazing cows and that the remaining is upland, live oak hammock, mixed wetland hardwoods, two cypress heads and catapalms. .The ground cover and mid-story vegetation has been impacted by the cattle grazing. -The site contains 48.67 acres of wetlands. -The applicant is proposing 0.08 acres of impact to the wetlands. -25.73 of upland buffer habitat surrounding the wetland acres will be retained, the total exceeding the 25% preservation requirement. -Mr. Hummiston verifies that the total acreage is 307 acres. He questions how 48.67 acres of wetland and 25.73 acres of upland make 25%. -Klm Hadley explained that it is 25% of existing vegetation not of the entire 307 acres. C) Robert Dwayne, of Hole Montes & Associates, represented the petitioner. -Stated he is not an expert in environmental planning, but has Tim Hall from Turrell & Associates and Jeff Head from Hole Montes & Associates, both available for questions. -Stated the project did not have a district permit, however they have filed their application for a permit .They have no disagreement with the stipulations recommended by staff -Mr. Carlson questioned how the Waste/Water Management Treatment in Immokalee going to handle a project this large. 1 Page 6 -Mr. Dwayne stated the sewage is going to be treated by the Immokalee Sewar and Water District and they will be provided fees to help treat the capacity of this project, and they are required by the DEP to fill out forms for permitting purposes -There were no public comments -Alexandra Santoro moved to approve with the staff's recommendations included, Mr. Hill seconded this motion, all were in favor, it passed unanimously (Mr. Hummiston refrained from voting on this subject due to the previously mentioned conflict) V. Old Business - There was no old business for discussion. VI. New Business A) Discussion on Beach Raking -Mr. Sansbury asked if he should fill out the appropriate form due to the fact that his employer owns part of a beachfront property that may be affected, Mr. White advised he waited to see if conflict arose after hearing the concerns, Mr. Sansbury agreed. 1) 2) Bill Lorenz, Natural Resources Director, stated the EAC requested there be a discussion concerning beach raking and Mr. Lorenz advised that the Coastal Advisory Committee had also requested that county staff advise them about what was occurring with the county's operations concerning beach raking. Presentations are being made to both parties, today's presentation is to provide the EAC with information on beach raking and begin a discussion, which may develop action later in this year. Maura Kraus, principal environmental specialist for the Collier County Natural Resources Department, gave a presentation on beach raking and its environmental effects, she provided a pack of information as well. -Collier County began raking the beaches in 1990 on Marco Island. They used an ATV, a tractor with a chain link fence behind to smooth the beach. -In 1995 they upgraded to a forked rake, this penetrated the sand 2 inches, with the chain link fence following behind to smooth out the beach. -In 1996 they used a beach rake to provide routine maintenance, clean up after storm events, and restoration to beaches of Marco, Naples, Park Shore, and Vanderbilt beaches. The DEP issued a permit to rake on an as needed basis, it was not the intent to rake for no reason. -Environmental effects of the large machines to the beaches and dunes are removal of sand and shell, removal of seed sources and seedlings, reduction in the integrity of the beach, dune and root systems. -The EPA conducted a study in Maine, showed beaches that were raked had 25% less root mass, rhizomes coming from the dunes. The closer to the dunes the more damage done. It also removes nutrients from the dunes that act as natural fertilizer, it eliminates natural re-development of the dunes. -Mr. Carlson questioned dragging versus raking and to what extent their uses are. -Maura Kraus stated that original the beaches were only dragged until 1996 when the larger machine was purchased in order to remove rocks and now the machine is regularly raking the entire beach. Page 7 -Maura Kraus explained that the reason the larger machines affect the dunes is because the root mass extends 25-ft from the dunes and the rakes go within 10-ft. -Mr. Hill questioned that since the county has increased the scope of its raking, is it therefor in violation of the DEP' s originally issued permit. -Maura Kraus stated she was unsure, that when she spoke to the DEP they stated it was not the intent to rake the entire beach on a regular basis. -Maura Kraus stated the environmental impact to sea turtles is that it can cause compaction over a misidentified or false crawls, removal of sand and shell can cause the eggs to become exposed, and removing of nesting evidence if raking occurs before monitoring. -Mr. Sansbury questioned if any of this has definitely happened. -Maura Kraus stated that they are not aware if this is happening in Collier County, but she provided the packets to show testimony of other areas, which rake, and the fact that these dangers have been noted as occurring -Mr. Sansbury stated he would like the dunes researched to see if the dunes are being affected by the raking. -Mr. Hummiston stated that this theory of the dunes ability to grow without raking is a rational theory. -Maura Kraus stated that there is also an effect to the macro-invertebrates, Mole crabs, coquinas, removal of ghost crabs, and damage to crabs and their burrows due to their proximity' s to the rack line and the surface of the sand, since the larger raking machines go as far as 2 inches down. -There is environmental affect to birds and their nesting sites. She states example in Marco. The nests, chicks, and eggs ca n be crushed, there is also a threat to some birds who feed off the rack line. -The rack line also provides habitat and food source to sport fish, therefor the removal of beach rack will affect this. -She would like the county to educate the public on the rack lines and their place in the eco-system, work better with the adopt a shore program, look at smoothing or different equipment, and feels they need to better determine when the shore should be raked versus smoothed, keep better documentation of materials, and create a clear definition of the necessity of raking. -The entire maintained beaches are being raked, Maura Kraus used a map to show specific locals being maintained. She stated that the state maintains that the rakes can be adjusted to not pick up the sand and shell, but she has observed that even though there are adjustments there has not been a change. 3) Ron Hovell, coastal' s project manager for Collier County, gave background on himself and the program. -started with the county last summer -his program is 100% supported by tourist tax funds so they consider a lot of the input from the tourist community -offered a brief packet to cover some of the information. -Review of the packet: A) currently, since 1996, the county rakes Vanderbilt, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco Island (Mostly in beach re-nourishment permit and beach raking permit areas) Page 8 B) They are currently using the Mechanical raking equipment primarily to remove rocks. They have 3 sets of equipment and 3 operators. He feels that the reason this program has grown is due to tourism and not looking at the environmental side. C) The Pelican Bay Services Division maintains their beaches with an old tractor and about every six weeks has the county bring in the mechanical rakes. D) In the past 6-9 mos. these issues have been reviewed at the Coastal Advisory Committee, the Conservancy, The EAC, the City of Naples, and Marco Island. Marco Island wants to continue raking every day, Naples supports reducing mechanical raking to as needed and picking up trash by hand, this is also the view of the conservancy. E) They have one set of equipment in need of repair, which they are choosing to not do so, lower their equipment # to 2. The third operator is using a "gator" to hand pick up trash. They also are now only raking above the rack line unless they determine with natural resources that they need to do otherwise. The goal is to remove the amount of shell and sand being removed. \ F) The requirements of the federal, state, and county permitting issues are that the depth of raking not go below 2 inches and that ground pressure is supposed to be less than 10/sq. inch. G) The conflict: Original intent is to remove rocks and you can't do this with 2 inches depth. H) The consent order: The re-nourishment in 1996 pumped up rock onto the beaches, the county has been under a notice of violation from both the state and the army Corp of engineers. Last summer the state changed this to a consent order. A rock removal plan had to be submitted, raking was built in to this plan, therefor if changes of raking are made, they will need to go back and make changes to the rock removal plan. -Mr. Gal questioned if Marco Island or the City of Naples approval is needed or if the county is just looking to them for input. Mr. Hovell stated that although they are 100% funded by tourist tax fund, which is advised to the Board of County Commissioners by both Tourist Development Council, (which has members in it that are from the city of Naples and Marco Island), as well as the Coastal Advisory Committee, (which has three members from Marco Island and three members from the City of Naples and three members from the County), because they historically have maintained all the beaches including beach raking with the tourist tax fund, it does become a joint decision. -Mr. Lorenz showed a slide represented the cycle of time they would have to follow in order to create change. He feels that there are two main components that they will need to address in regards to beach raking. 1) establishing the county's protocol, in reference to when and where raking should occur, identify beach grooming versus smoothing and where these protocols can he adjusted to lower the environmental impact. 2) To what degree do they have to make modifications to the Land Development Code. Some of the items staff decided would need modification are: 1) marking tires on ATV's did not work and needs eliminated, 2) need better definition of raking, grooming, smoothing; etc., 3) need to look at beach re-nourishment and the requirements that will allow this. -Alexandra Santoro requested the requirements for the beach re-nourishment be sent to them prior to other discussions. -The staff is going to do so. Page 9 -Public comment 4) Jerry Therion, represented La Playa Beach Resort and the Naples Visitor Bureau. He stated he is not an expert, but claims to be a self-proclaimed expert in resort tourism due to his 35 years of experience. They are in support of the environment but that the local residents and the tourist demand that the beaches be at least maintained. He said he has had comments that the beaches aren what they used to be , the beaches "are nicer and less expensive" elsewhere. He emphasized that the tourist level creates the tourist tax, which pays for the beaches to be maintained. In his observation they are staying well beyond the 10-ft dune line. -Mr. Gal does not believe that ceasing to rake the beaches will cease tourism. -Mr. Therion stated they are not against smoothing, that in the past dragging an old bedspring drug behind did the trick. -Mr. Carlson agreed and stated that smoothing is good for the turtles. 5) Chris Pataglia, stated that she lives in Park Shore and is on the board of Gulf Shore Association of Condominiums. She stated that they are for all environmental concerns, and as the speaker before mentioned they want to protect the environment but they do not want the services to the beach to discontinue. They want the beaches to continue to be manicured and that there are certain times for stronger maintenance, such as red -tide events. Her organization, is for keeping the level of current services and do not want to see a reduction. 6) Tom Cravens, has been coming to Vanderbilt beaches since 1979. He is now living in Pelican Bay and walks on the beaches daily. He stated that when it is plowed it is sterile land with "no critters" and that it is difficult to walk. He wants the beach raking to stop and does not feel it will affect tourism. 7) Sharon Cromwall, representing the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, stated that in March she mailed a letter that stated their concerns, and again addressed the EAC in April about their concerns. She stated she felt Maura covered the environmental aspects thoroughly, but she wanted to add a few other things. She reported that during the fiscal year 2001 1300 tons was taken to the landfill and so far this year 733 tons, consisting of mostly sand and shell. She also stated she shoveled a five-gallon bucket out of the dumpster to sample what was being raked. She stated that she is aware this was not a very scientifically sound research, but wanted a general idea of what was leaving the beaches. The five-gallon bucket she withdrew from the Naples dumpster weighed 44 lbs. and contained 21 lbs. of shells, 9 lbs. of sand, 13 lbs. of rock, and a minute amount of litter. They would like to see beach raking limited and see clarification of when it is a necessity to rake. -Mr. Carlson questioned if they were offering Sarasota County beach raking plan as a model (listed in the letter). She stated it was an example of what other counties do to regulate, and that they did not necessarily want those regulations, just specific policies implemented. -Mr. Gal would like to see studies that not only survey damages by raking, but also surveys to see if tourist dollars are being affected. -Mr. Hummiston said that we bring the sand and shells in at times and it is a detriment to take it out, but that he believes smoothing is needed and that he believes that at some point staff will bring this back with changes and they can consider things further then. Page 10 -Mr. Lorenz stated that it will come back at a later point and that today was to bring information before the board so they were aware of the discussions at the time and have a chance to state some concerns. -Mr. Gal and Alexandra Santoro feel that Marco Island may be a good testing ground to stop raking and see what the affects are. Mr. Gal said that due to the political nature possibly causes this not to be attempted that he was willing to lobby on behalf of trials if it would help in the future. B) Amendment to the EAC Ordinance to delete the annual reporting requirement -Bill Lorenz stated that the reporting requirement now in place, to report once every year, is unique to the EAC, and that other advisory committees report once every four years. The county management recommends that the EAC be on a similar reporting requirement. At this point he just wanted the board to be aware and it will come before the board for advisement closer to the point of passing it. VII. Council Member Comments - there were no additional comments made. VIII. Public Comments - there were no additional public comments made. IX. Adjournment - the meeting adjourned at 12pm Page 11 Carter Hen~ing Coyle Coletta AGENDA ECEIVED Bo~rO of Count~ [:ommissioners COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2002, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FL 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL BY CLERK ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA - APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 18 & 19, 2002, (AUGUST 1, 2002 MINUTES ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME). PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: DWIGHT RICHARDSON - ABSENT- AUGUST 1, 2002 BCC REPORT - RECAPS - JULY 30, 2002 CHAIRMAN'S REPORT ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS BD-2002-AR-2416, F. Jeffrey Pusateri, requesting a boathouse protruding 17 ft. into the waterway at 246 1st Street, further described as Lot 2, Block B, Little Hickory Shores Unit 1. (Coordinator: Ross Gochenaur) BD-2002-AR-2564, Ben Nelson, of Nelson Marine Construction, rel~ilt~lilTBs:Richard Bye, requesting a 28-foot extension for a boat dock facility protruding a total of 48 feet into the waterway for property located at 267 3rd Street West, further d~scribed ~Ditiept__2~2, ~31oFk G, Little Hickory Shores Unit 3 Replat. (Coordinator: Ross Gochenaur) l°l Item// Copies To: 11. 12. 13. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEMS DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA ADJOURN Revised 8/28/02/CCPC AGENDA/SM/sp 16J July 18 & 19, 2002 / Henning--~..-~~ Ooyle co~.tt,~ _-.--L/' -- Collier County Planning Commission County Commissioners Boardroom Building F, 3rd Floor 3301 Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34104 16J 1 MINUTES July 18, 2002 ATTENDANCE Members: Chairman Kenneth Abernathy Russell A. Budd Mark Strain David Wolfley Dwight Richardson Paul Midney Lora Jean Young Lindy Adelstein Staff: Marjorie Student - Assistant County Attorney, Ray Bellows - Planning Services, Susan Murray - Current Planning Staff, Fred Reischl - Planning Services, Steve Lenberger- Planning Services, Greg Garcia- Transportation Planning, Joe Schmitt - CDES Administrator, Kay Deselem - Planning Services, Patrick White - Assistant County Attorney, Stan Chrzanowski - Development Services Engineering, Cormac Giblin - Housing Development Manager, Russ Muller - Engineering Department Others: Austin White, Carol Wright, Alvin Doyle Martin, B.J. Savard- Boyer, Fred Nader, Dick Lydon, Michael Femandez, Kenneth Goodman, Rich Yuvanovich, Don Cahill, John White, Bill Reckmeyer, Gus Flier, Doug Grant, Clay Brooker, Doug Fee, Dan George, Robert Duan~~s: Hermanson, Ted Treesh, Fred Thomas, Bill Klohn, Pat McCuan, Russ Miller, Peter Catuzzi, Made Ingram, Tracy Ingram, Mr. O' Pires, Mike Landy, RayAnn Boylen, Mario Curiale, David Farmer, Kevin Item# Copies Bamhill, Nicole Ryan, John Belt, Charles Healy, Anderson, Mike Reagan July 18 & 19, 2002 16J 1 Robert McConnell, Bruce Chairman Kenneth Abernathy called meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Il. ROLL CALL Mr. Abemathy called the roll of the Planning Commission. III. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA There were no changes from staff. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - No Meeting on July 4, 2002, as it was a holiday. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES Mr. Abernathy questioned which commission members would be absent at the first meeting in August. Mr. Richardson stated he would be absent. VI. BCC REPORT - RECAPS - June 11, June 19, and June 25, 2002 Joe Schmitt noted that Commissioner Henning had called for the amendments to the GMP for Concurrency to be on the agenda at the July 30th meeting. This issue was approved by the BCC with a 3-2 vote. Mr. Abernathy noted that the board had stripped out their soft landing approach. Mr. Schmitt added that it was presented to the board, but they went with the direction of staff. VII. CHAIRAMAN'S REPORT Mr. Abernathy stated he would liketo discuss the need for a second meeting in August under New Business. VIII. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. LDC AMENDMENTS Susan Murray stated that this had already been seen by the commission, but due to an advertising error, it was not adopted last cycle. It was concerning vehicle parking in conjunction with residential structures. Mr. Abernathy closed the public hearing. Mr. Strain questioned on Item D if the maximum driveway width would allow a width of 20 feet. Ms. Murray stated it would allow them to construct a driveway of 20-foot width. On Item 5, it stated that vehicles needed to be owned or leased by the residents, and Mr. Strain asked if they were making it illegal to have visitors or borrowed cars parked at the residence. Ms. Murray said it wouldn't be an issue unless the vehicles were illegally parked. They could recommend to the board to provide language, but she assumed code enforcement would give leniency if there wasn't an illegal parking issue. Mr. Strain was concerned about this being taken to the extreme and suggested that this be brought up to the board when they reviewed it. 2 Mr. Schmitt added that this was only applicable to non-deed restricted areas in the county. Ms. Murray added that the target was for the multiple vehicles parked at a residence on a consistent basis. Mr. Wolfley asked if they could place a timing provision in the amendment and noted that code enforcement only reacts when a complaint has been made. Mr. Abernathy suggested they needed to take out "and" from paragraph 4 on the last page. Mr. Budd motioned to transmit LDC section 2.3.5 with a recommendation for adoption, Mr. Adelstein seconded. Marjorie Student stated that they needed to add a finding for consistency as part of the motion. Mr. Budd amended the motion. rn in for this hearing. Fred Reischl stated that this was a t variance of 2.5 feet. The site plan was approved at 35 e that it was a corner lot, so they would have exceeded the nt. Mr. Reischl showed an aerial of the home and stated that there were no other homes affected by this. Staff recommended approval. Mr. Abernathy closed the public hearing. Mr. Budd motioned to forward petition VA-2002-AR-2444 to the BZA with a ~~~i~llA'or~roval, David Wolfley seconded. Passed unanimously. J C. VA-2002-AR-2011 ~ ( ~re 4 persons sworn in for this hearing. Mr. Reischl stated this wasa request ~~~._~c.es. He stated that the drive aisles are required to be 24 feet, and these wetc ,.,_,-~htrdi'6-d at 22 feet. The site plan was approved administratively, the property has been open for 3 years, and they are now being requested to go through the variance process. The engineering department felt that the 24-foot drive aisles were necessary, so staff recommended approvals for the setbacks and denial for the aisle width. Mr. Wolfley asked if the STP was approved initially, and Mr. Reischl stated it was built to the STP. Stan Chrzanowski - Development Services Engineering Mr. Chrzanowski stated that they had a standard width of 24 feet when there was 90° parking off the drive aisle. They needed this to have sufficient room when two vehicles were passing in the drive aisle. Mr. Abernathy felt that this could be distinguished for precedent purposes since there was staff complicity. He questioned the width of the parking spaces and Mr. Chrzanowski stated they were 9 feet. Mr. Abemathy noted that the parking lot felt crowded to him when he had visited. Mr. Chrzanowski commented that this community tends to have larger vehicles. He noted that there have been no complaints or accidents, and he felt that people tend to drive slower when they are constrained. De July 18 & 19, 2002 Mr. Strain noted that there have been exceptions for two 10_foot drive~ai:s~es a~nd 1 these were already at 11 feet on each side. He wasn't sure if there was much of an issue. Mr. Wolfley asked why they were built at 22 feet. Mr. Reischl stated that the former Planning Services Manager approved this STP. Mr. Richardson asked if there was a way to repair this problem by restriping. Mr. Chrzanowski stated that there was no very cheap way to repair this, and he wasn't sure if there was a reasonable way. Mr. Richardson felt that giving the variance would be approving something that was wrong. Mr. Reischl stated that a variance would admit an error had been made, rather than changing the PUD. Mr. Schmitt added that the error was made by staff and so it was developed to the appropriate standards at the time it was built. Mr. Reischl noted that only some areas of the complex were in violation, not the entire parking lot. Mr. Abemathy closed the public heating. Mr. Budd motioned to forward petition VA-2002-AR-2011 to the BZA with a recommendation for approval on all variances, Mr. Strain seconded. The motion carried 7 for and 1 against, with Mr. Richardson opposed. VA-2002-AR-2015 There were 7 persons sworn in for this hearing. Kay Deselem stated that the STP was issued in error relative to the development and parking regulations and they were seeking a variance to obey a code violation for having excessive floor space of the 19 hotel units. Mr. Adelstein disclosed that he spoke with staff on this issue and Mr. Strain disclosed that he spoke with Patrick White, Assistant County Attorney. Ms. Deselem stated that the approval of this variance would have no effect on the infrastructure, transportation, or the environment. She replied that a hotel allows 26 units per acre and a multi-family use allows 16 units per acre, therefore if it was permitted as a multi-family development, it would be over by one unit. Mr. Richardson felt that there was a fairly pervasive attempt by the applicant to deceive the county. Mr. Abernathy questioned the stage of development of this project, and Ms. Deselem replied it was complete and occupied legally in a condo- type ownership. Mr. Schmitt stated that the situation was that the homeowner's were now being cited for the violation. Mr. Abernathy asked if there was a lobby in the building, and Ms. Deselem stated that there was a lobby in the building but it did not operate in the conventional sense. Mr. Abernathy suggested that they require a kiosk or a rental office at the site. Mr. Richardson questioned if it was a locked operation. Ms. Deselem stated she was not sure, but there were no signs as a normal hotel would have. Mr. Strain questioned if the docks and cabanas at the property were open to the public. Ms. Deselem believed that they were not open to the public. Mr. Strain questioned which assignment would have more intense traffic. Ms. Deselem believed that a hotel or motel would generate more traffic. 4 July 18 & 19, 2002 16J ! Patrick White - Assistant County Attorney Mr. White was sworn in. He stated that the 19 units were owned condo units. He verified that there was a lobby and parking on the first floor. He added that the doors and elevators were typically locked and the means of rental was through a rental agent. He clarified that it was either a hotel or a transient lodging facility and if the term was 6 months or less, then it would be transient. Mr. Adelstein questioned if bed tax was collected when an owner occupied the unit. Mr. White said that was the case and he felt the facts and requirements that the staff has made seem to comply with what the code requires. Mr. Richardson asked how much bed tax had been collected. Mr. White was not sure, but that should be presented at a later time. Mr. Richardson felt this information should be available since this has been in operation. Mr. Richardson questioned whether he felt it was operating as a condo or a hotel. Mr. White replied that even if it operated as a "hotel", it would still be a condominium, so the idea was that it would be a transient lodging facility. Mr. Abernathy stated that there was no definition of transient in the LDC, but if they placed the 6-month time period on it, then everything could be considered a hotel. Mr. White stated that staff has given their best recommendation. He noted that transient refers to a period of time rather than a type of occupant. He stated this would still be considered transient use, which would require a bed tax. Mr. Strain questioned why they didn't call it a condominium seeking a variance for one extra unit. Mr. White stated that condominium refers to a type of ownership. If you're residential, then the density was restricted to 16 units per acre, but if you're commercial transient use, then density can be increased to 26 units. He added the size of the transient rooms was limited to 500 sq. ft. Mr. Strain stated if it was a hotel, then it would pay the bed tax and individuals would receive tax advantages and if it was a condo, then they don't pay bed tax but they get a less immediate tax advantage. Mr. White said that would be correct if he changed the word "hotel" to "transient occupancy" and "condo" to "residential". Mr. Richardson questioned if this passed, then were they going to see LDC changes to this issue. Mr. White stated that it was alluded that there wouldn't be size limitations as part of the Vanderbilt Beach moratorium. Mr. Richardson didn't feel this was the right vehicle to bring about those changes. Mr. Adelstein added that they were going out of their way to bring this into compliance when they knew the rules when they designed and built the property and he believed they should live with it. Mr. White stated that the county also knew that when they approved the project. Austin White - Attorney representing Manatee Resort and 19 owners Austin White stated that the owners were cited by the code enforcement board. He stated that this was approved in 1997. Two years ago the owners began operating, and were seeking a license as a resort condominium. He assured that the bed tax has been paid by the individuals and is now paid by the rental agent. He urged the commission to approve this variance and noted they were living with the condo documents as drafted. Mr. Richardson questioned why this issue has been in limbo 5 for so long. Austin White stated that the variance was due to the increased size of the rooms, not the type of use. Mr. Richardson said that it seemed these units were being bought and functioning as condominiums. Austin White stated they were condominiums and the declaration of condominium requires hotel use. Austin White noted that the owner of each unit was not allowed to use the unit year-round. Mr. Abernathy suggested they add that the rental agent will render an annual report to the county. Ms. Deselem stated that it would be more appropriate to change the language under ownership entity does the reporting. Carol Wright - President of Vanderbilt Beach and Bay Association Ms. Wright said that her statements were endorsed by the entire VBBA board. They were not interested in penalizing the owners of the Manatee Resort, but she felt the LDC should be obeyed and upheld and there should be penalties when it was violated. When this hotel was built, the code allowed 26 units per acre at a maximum of 500 sq. ft. She felt this was built as a condo, sold as a condo and ran like a condo. Ms. Wright stated that the doors were locked, there were no signs, there was no maid service, there was no overnight lodging, there was no way to call and make a reservation, and the Manatee Hotel was not in the phonebook. She believed the developer built it as a hotel to reap the benefit of more density. She stated that Manatee owners have told her that they were unaware that they were buying into a hotel. She would prefer to see it ran as a condo rather than a hotel. She said that developers should not violate codes as "business as usual". She asked the commission to vote against this variance. Mr. Abemathy asked if she had any suggestions to remedy this problem. Ms. Wright stated that they could get rid of one unit, and she added that the architect lived in one of the units. She stated that she liked the way it has been run as a condo, but she would like to see the proper people penalized. Alvin Martin - Homeowner Mr. Martin stated this issue revolved around corporate governance, greed, accountability and oversight. He said it was never designed as a hotel. He stated that the law was broken and was still being broken and the county was saying, "let's change the law". Mr. Martin stated that he would propose they rezone to residential condominium use. Mr. Wolfley asked what recourse they had, and Mr. Martin felt they should hold the developer accountable and the first step would be denying this variance. B.J. Savard-Boyer - Vanderbilt Beach Property Owner's Association Ms. Boyer read a letter from the President of the Association, Frank Halas, which asked the commission to vote against the variance. Ms. Boyer stated that the developer only wanted to get money so he misrepresented his intentions to the county. She showed a printout of the MLS system where thc Manatee was listed under condominiums. She noted that the original condo documents state it is a hotel, so thc owner's cannot live there unless the code changes. Mr. Strain stated that the Manatee has condo documents with the word "hotel" sprinkled in a few times, which 6 July 18 & 19, 2002 16J was not like typical hotel-condominium documents. He noted that to be a condominium, they were over by 6/10 of a unit. Ms. Boyer suggested that this 6/10 of a unit could be a clubhouse or a library. Fred Nader - Owner of a Manatee unit Mr. Nader was sworn in. Mr. Nader stated that he bought his unit from the realtor, who was the developer, and he had no idea it was a hotel. He noted that the lawyer that was used was now debarred because he was a thief. He stated that he had to move out of the condo because he did not want to violate the law. Mr. Strain asked why they didn't apply for a variance to apply for 6/10 of a unit. Patrick White said that they would have to ask for a "density variance" which was not allowed by the code. Dick Lydon - Mr. Lydon was sworn in. Mr. Lydon did not want this turned into a hotel, so he suggested that they grant the variance and let it play as a condo. Michael Fernandez - Attorney representing the petitioner Mr. Fernandez stated that there was no limitation on size of rooms in Collier County for commercial uses, and he felt this met the request of variance and was in accordance with the code. Mr. Abernathy closed the public hearing. Mr. Budd stated that staff errors were made in this case, but he motioned to forward petition VA-2002-AR-2015 with a recommendation of approval with the conditions in the staff report, Mr. Wolfley seconded. Mr. Richardson stated that he would rather see this turned down and pass along a message to make a change in the code so they can deal with this in a residential condominium fashion. Mr. Adelstein agreed and felt by approving, it would be compounding a fraud. Mrs. Young agreed. Mr. Strain stated that he would like to change the GMP and then ask for one more unit. He also suggested that language be added to the motion to restrict the variance to the existing plan and restrict the use of homestead exemptions. Marjorie Student stated that a GMP amendment could be done. Mr. Schmitt felt it would be a significant undertaking to amend the GMP for a single project. Mr. Budd was concerned that if they denied the variance, they would be choking the innocent while only making the guilty feel bad. Mr. Budd agreed to the two additions to the motion. The motion failed 3 for and 5 against, with Mr. Midney, Mr. Adelstein, Mrs. Young, Mr. Richardson, and Mr. Strain voting against the motion. Mr. Richardson motioned to deny petition VA-2002-AR-2015 on the basis that there are other solutions available and due to contradictions to the existing LDC, Mr. Adelstein seconded. Ms. Student stated that the criterion needed to come form the 8 criteria in the code. Mr. Richardson stated criteria a)-d) in the code, and specifically f), that it was not in harmony with the general intent and purpose of 7 July 18 & 19, 2002 163 the LDC and would be injurious to the neighborhood and detrimental to the public welfare. The motion passed 5 for and 3 against, with Mr. Abernathy, Mr. Wolfley, and Mr. Budd voting against the motion. ite break at 11:00 a.m.) sworn in for this hearing. Mr. Reischl stated that this was a ariance to allow a 50-foot reduction of front yard setbacks. He stated that the petitioner wants to be able to have larger homes and this variance would be for 20 lots, not just one. He had received six phone calls, but there were no objections to this variance request. Staff recommended denial of the variance because there was no land related hardship and they couldn't require there be a 2500 sq. ft. home when they could build 1000 sq. ft. homes. Mr. Strain noted that they wanted a larger backyard, but in looking at the site plan, they only need to grant the variance for lots 4-9 and 14-19 since the other lots were deeper. Mr. Reischl agreed. Mr. Wolfley asked if they were recommending denial because they looked at the neighborhood rather than individual homes, but Mr. Reischl stated that they did look at individual lots and there was no land related hardship. He added that Ed Carlson called and had no objections to the variance. Mr. Richardson asked in light of all of this if they were still recommending denial. Ray Bellows stated that they were recommending denial because the petitioner had adequate use of the land based on the minimum code requirements. Ken Goodman - Goodman & Breen Mr. Goodman stated that most of the lots were under water. Therefore, they were asking for a 50-foot setback of a 1-acre lot, which was basically what they had. Mr. Goodman noted that they would like the flexibility to build larger homes if desired. Mr. Strain stated that they did not need the variance for all 20 lots. Mr. Goodman felt there was land-related hardship on this property. Mr. Richardson felt that they created the hardship because they were trying to maximize the gain. Mr. Abemathy closed the public hearing. Mr. Budd motioned to forward petition VA-2002-AR-2035 with a recommendation for approval, Mr. Wolfley seconded. Mr. Strain asked if he would consider amending this for the 13 lots, but Mr. Budd wanted to leave the motion as is. Mr. Adelstein stated he had a problem with approving this for all the lots because they didn't all have the need. Mrs. Young agreed. The motion died with 4 for and 4 against, with Mr. Adelstein, Mrs. Young, Mr. Richardson and Mr. Strain voting against the motion. 8 July 18 & 19, 2002 16J Mr. Budd motioned to forward petition VA-2002-AR-2035 with a recommendation for approval for lots 4-9 and 13-19 only, Mr. Midney seconded. The motion carried 7 for and 1 against, with Mr. Richardson voting against the motion. VA-2002-AR-2044 Mr. Adelstein disclosed that he received a phone call from Ted Beisler who asked if Mr. Adelstein could deliver a letter that he wrote to the commission. There were 2 persons sworn in for this hearing. Mr. Reischl stated that this was a request for a variance for a car wash that was currently open on Radio and Livingston Roads. The LDC in the C-5 district requires 5-foot rear yard setbacks, but if they are adjacent to residential, they have an increased setback of 40 feet. However, this was adjacent to the golf course maintenance area. The petitioner was requesting a 30-foot variance in order to add an open-air canopy. There were 8 phone calls regarding this petition, but there were no objections. Mr. Beisler's letter stated that he had no objection as long as the car wash built a wall that was required by the county. Staff recommended approval of a 25-foot variance. Mr. Richardson noted staff's 180-day time period if the use were to cease. Rich Yuvanovich - Attorney representing the petitioner Mr. Yuvanovich stated that the canopy was open on all 4 sides in order to provide protection for the workers at the car wash. He said the site plan was approved as if it was not next to a residential area, but when they requested a 5-foot variance, staff found the error, so they now had to ask for a 30-foot variance. Mr. Yuvanovich informed that the operation could not be seen from the road or from residential areas and felt there was a land-related hardship in this case. He had no problem with staff's request to remove the canopy if the operation ceased for over 180 days. Mr. Wolfley asked if this was a drive-thru and Mr. Yuvanovich stated it was. Mr. Strain questioned if there were any objections to the wall, and Mr. Yuvanovich stated there were not. Mr. Richardson asked what was staff's opinion and Mr. Reischl replied that they did not feel there was a land-related hardship. Mr. Abemathy closed the public hearing. Mr. Budd motioned to forward petition VA-2002-AR-2044 to the BZA with a recommendation of approval of the 30-foot variance, Mr. Adelstein seconded. Passed unanimously. (There was a lunch recess at 12:00 p.m.) Mr. Schmitt introduced the new Director of Planning Services, Margaret Wertzlie. Ms. Wertzlie discussed her history. The Planning Commission welcomed her. G. VA-2002-AR-2691 There were 10 persons sworn in for this hearing. Ms. Deselem described the lots in question, as well as aerials and photos. She noted that the adjacent house was not oriented toward the petitioner's lot. Mr. Strain asked how many stories was the house, and Ms. Deselem replied that there were 3 stories above the garage. Mr. Abernathy asked if the footprint of the house lied on the Coastal Construction Setback Line, and Ms. Deselem said it did. Ms. Deselem noted that the variance for the CCSL was granted on October 9, 2001. Mr. Richardson asked if they deemed it not necessary to go to the EAC. Ms. Deselem stated that after checking with the environmental staff, they felt it was already addressed by the 8 conditions. Mr. Richardson noted a letter from the President of Barefoot Beach that recommended denial and the Architectural Review board also felt the variance should not be granted. Ms. Deselem stated that there were some letters of support and some objections as well. Mr. Strain felt that the house to the south was the only one that was really being affected. Mr. Adelstein asked if the house would fit on the lot if it was moved in some way, but Ms. Deselem stated this was not yet proven to her. Mr. Schmitt noted that they were actually asking for three separate variances, one on the west, one on the north, and one on the east sides. Mr. Abernathy stated that it seemed as though they were trying to fit 10 lbs. in a 9 lb. sack. Mr. Midney agreed and said that they knew the lot size when they started. Mr. Strain asked if this was the same condition as the previous variance where a house could fit on the lot if it weren't so big, and Ms. Deselem said that a house could fit on the lot. Mr. Richardson stated .if staff was consistent then they should recommend denial. Ms. Deselem felt it was different because the CCSL was already addressed and there was no necessary harm to the public. Mr. Richardson asked if there was a land-related hardship in staff's view. Ms. Deselem believed that there was since the gulf lots were considerably smaller and it also had a limited area to access the roadway. Mr. Schmitt added that the overriding factor in recommending approval was the approval of the CCSL variance. Mrs. Young noted that under condition d), the petitioner had not demonstrated a minimum variance. Ms. Deselem agreed, but she believed there could be a practical difficulty. Mr. Midney stated except that he designed the house too big of the lot. Mr. Schmitt noted that the house was the same design as what went to the BCC back in October. Mrs. Young felt that the granting of the variance would give the petitioner the privilege of being closer to the gulf than the neighboring lots. She felt that was of concern. Mr. Richardson stated that the other courtyard homes were successful in meeting the PUDs without variance requests. Ray Bellows noted that each individual home of this type would need to seek a variance and it was determined on the amount of encroachment, so this would not be setting any precedent. Don Cahill - Architect Mr. Cahill discussed that they got the preliminary site plan approval from the property owner's association, the plans were prepared and submitted, the county said they needed a variance for the CCSL, they approved the CCSL variance, the plans were finished and approved by the state, the construction was started, and then the 10 July 18 & 19, 2002 16J neighbor requested they get a variance. He added that the footprint was completely within the setback requirements; only the balconies and roof needed the variances. Mr. Cahill added that they did get approval from the Architectural Review Committee and the homeowner's association. He stated that all of the neighbors in Beach Garden C supported this variance, except one they have not heard from. John White - Attorney representing the petitioner Mr. White felt that they were not asking for anything that was hugely in excess. Mr. Strain stated that the standard in the LDC was 36 inches, but they were asking for 10 feet, which was over three times what is allowed. Mr. White restated that process of approvals that this project has gone through. He felt there were some criteria for hardship in this case, for example, the expenditures of $100,000 by the petitioner and a permit that expires at the end of this year. Mr. Richardson noted that in the most recent letter from the homeowner's association of June 25, 2002, they did not approve of the variances. Mr. White felt it was sent as an individual, rather than an association. Mr. Strain felt that t.he petitioner clearly knew what the setbacks were at the time of closing. Mr. Adelstein suggested that they slightly reduce the size of the house, but Mr. White felt that it was consistent with others in the neighborhood. Mrs. Young questioned if there were open balconies, but Mr. Cahill clarified that there were glass railings at the required heights. Mr. Budd questioned if the site line was based on the peak overhang. Mr. Cahill noted that the window .on the second floor would have 18 inches visible from their view. William Reckmeyer - Owner of the lot Mr. Reckmeyer felt he was trying to do what everyone wanted, but the roles were being changed midstream. He stated that the letters of opposition were from people who could not even see his property from theirs. He added that all those from Beach Garden C have supported it. He said that since he was spending $2 million for the lot, he was going to try to put the largest thing on it. Mrs. Young questioned if they could compress the house a little, but Mr. Cahill stated that the footprint was contained on the buildable land. Gus Flier - Mr. Flier submitted a letter to the commission. Clay Brooker - Attorney representing Phillip Lewallen Mr. Brooker restated that his client's house was the most affected by this proposed house. He stated that Mr. Lewallen does object to it on the grounds that they have not met the code by the county or Florida law. Mr. Lewallen also felt that his view would be obstructed. Mr. Brooker believed that the CCSL should have no impact on the variance requests for today. He went through the 8 criteria for variances and described how this was not in line with them. He stated that neighbors have the right to rely on the existing zoning conditions and he recommended denial of the variances. Doug Grant - Mr. Grant was representing Richard Dolan who lives in Beach Garden C at Barefoot Beach. He owns the first home north of the subject's house. Mr. Dolan 11 was concerned about selling his home due to the variance. Mr. Budd asked if Mr. Dolan had changed his mind since he previously signed a petition of approval, and Mr. Grant stated that he had. Doug Fee - President of the North Bay Citdc Association Mr. Fee stated that some of his members live in Barefoot Beach area. He discussed some of the general objectives to the LDC from the MuniciCode website. He asked that they review the CCSL process in order to make the public aware of when these variances are passed. Mr. Schmitt recommended that his association bring a proposal to Development Services for amendment of this process. Dan George - President of the Property Owner's Association Mr. George stated that his concern has been to downsize to get inside the lot lines. He stated that he was talking as President of the property's owner association, not merely as an individual. He added they were trying to preserve sizes in the neighborhood and he felt that they needed to say enough is enough. Mr. White felt that Mr. Reckmeyer's application does show a need for a variance on several accounts and this was consistent with the trend in the neighborhood. Mr. Abernathy closed the public hearing. Mr. Richardson motioned to deny petition VA-2002-AR-2691 on the basis that the house was designed too big for the lot, it exceeded the boundaries in every dimension, it would not be in keeping with the LDC, it provided special treatment to the petitioner, there was opposition from the neighbors, it did not have any built-in hardship based on the land, and all eight conditions seem to militate against the petition, Mr. Adelstein seconded. The motion carried 5 for and 3 against, with Mr. Budd, Mr. Abernathy and Mr. Wolfley voting against the motion. (There was a 15-minute break at 3:15 p.m.) Mr. Abemathy noted that Item I would be taken before Item H on the agenda. PUDZ-2002-AR-2491 Them were 11 persons sworn in for this hearing. Mr. Strain disclosed that he conversations with the applicant, two of his consultants, and Fred Thomas. Mr. Midney disclosed that he spoke with Mr. Thomas. Ray Bellows stated that the petitioner was requesting a rezone from PUD to PUD in order to amend the Arrowhead PUD. They are currently approved for 900 units at 3 units per acm. They would like to increase to maximum number of dwelling units to 1190 units for workforce housing and to eliminate mobile home uses. Mr. Bellows stated some of staff's conditions on the project. Staff was of the opinion that all of the requests were acceptable. Them were a few traffic concerns. 12 July 18 & 19, 2002 16J 1 Greg Garcia - Transportation Planning Mr. Garcia discussed some of the changes in the language relevant to the PUD. There were some concerns for impact fee credits, now impact fee credits were not allowed. Mr. Garcia noted the deletion of the word "timing" from page 19, letter N. Ms. Student noted that the whole PUD document needed to be readopted. Mr. Bellows added that it has been fast-tracked due to workforce housing. Mr. Richardson asked if there was acceptable level of service, and Mr. Garcia assured that it would meet the acceptable level of service. Mr. Wolfley asked what was the current level of service, and Mr. Garcia answered it was LOS-C. The commission was informed that the only changes to the packet were the traffic updates. Mr. Bellows stated that the intent was to adopt the specific transportation requests in the packet. Robert Duane - Hole Montes, Inc. representing the petitioners Mr. Duane stated that the traffic work has been conducted over the past 6 weeks. He stated there weren't any level of service problems and he also had support and petitions from the Immokalee community. He requested that the requirement of commercial development be reduced from 30% to 20% from the time the building permits are issued. Mr. Abernathy questioned when this petition was going before the BCC, and Mr. Duane answered on July 30th. George Hermanson - Hole Montes, Inc. Mr. Hermanson stated that an extensive traffic study has been conducted and he felt there were possible deficiencies at the intersections. They placed new conditions A- U on the PUD, including several traffic improvements. He stated that staff was in agreement with this. He noted the language that the board may consider to issue impact fee credits. Mr. Richardson stated that 50% of the completed project was 623 units, and he felt it might be prudent to start some of the improvements earlier. Mr. Garcia stated that the LOS was acceptable at this point. Mrs. Young asked what would be the LOS after development. Ted Treesh - Metro Transportation Group Mr. Treesh stated that with the traffic improvements, the roads would be operating at LOS-B or LOS-C. Mr. Hermanson added that the improvements would be in before the first CO was issued at the site plan approval. Cormac Giblin - Housing Development Manager Mr. Giblin urged the commission to support this amendment. He stated it was the first of its kind for a PUD of this scale for an entire development of workforce housing. He noted that 304 units would be owned by the county. Mrs. Young asked if they were going to incorporate smart growth concepts into the plan. Mr. Giblin said that they were planning two separate clubhouse facilities, nature walks and picnic areas. Fred Thomas - Executive Director of the Collier County Housing Commission Mr. Thomas stated that this was one of the first projects to address the problems faced in hnmokalee. He noted that they were affordable because of the tax credits. In 13 He July 18 & 19, 2002 regards to transportation, Mr. Thomas felt this would actually decrease the impacts to Lake Trafford Road due to the commercial developments. Bill Klohn - President of Cypress Glen Development Corporation Mr. Klohn had support letters of.the community. Mr. Bellows added that staff recommended approval. Patrick McCuan - Chairman, MDG Capital Corporation Mr. McCuan asked for the commission's approval and support of this amendment. He requested they encouraged the BCC to accept the configuration as well as the 20% reduction for the commercial requirement. Mr. Abemathy closed the public hearing. Mr. Wolfley commended the developer for committing 100% to workforce housing and agreeing to take care of traffic problems before they knew whether they would receive impact fee credits. Mr. Wolfley moved to forward petition PUDZ-2002-AR-2491 with a recommendation of approval with a modification of the language requested by staff, the commercial requirement reduced to 20% of the build-out, the open space of 12.1 acres be corrected on the Master Plan, and the latest transportation submittals to be used as the criteria, Mr. Strain seconded. Passed unanimously. (Paul Midney left at 4:25 p.m.) PUDA-2002-AR-2028 There were 11 persons sworn in for this heating. Mr. Richardson disclosed that he had discussions with Mr. Duane and Mr. Strain had the same disclosures as in item I. Mr. Bellows stated that they were requesting a PUD rezone to PUD for the purpose of amending the PUD to allow a new development strategy. He stated it was consistent with the future land use map. He noted that there was not an increase in the number of units and the traffic impacts were the same. He added this was also workforce housing. Mr. Giblin stated that he wished there were more developers like this and noted that they were not receiving any density bonuses. They would like to provide 10% of the development to low-income homebuyers, at a minimum of 5%. Mr. Strain stated this was a good example of affordable housing infill. Mr. Wolfley clarified that they wanted to reduce the building height from 3-stories to 2-stories and to reduce the 10- foot buffer to 5 feet. Mr. Bellows agreed and noted that the Community School was going to lend 5 feet as well. Mr. Strain stated that they had no way to enforce this agreement between the two parties. 14 July 18 & 19, 2002 16J Patrick McCuan - CEO, MDG Capital Corporation Mr. McCuan stated this project was more important than the last because it was actually located in Naples. He noted it was integrated along into more market rate housing. Mr. Richardson asked if the 5 feet was critical for the project, and Mr. McCuan stated it was. Robert Duane - Hole Montes, Inc. Mr. Duane noted that 35 units were under $130,000 and would qualify for the SHIP program. He restated that they were not receiving any density bonuses. He stated that staff wanted to maintain the buffer, but there was no buffer planned at this time. Mr. Duane addressed the 4 conditions in the staff report. In regards to sidewalks, they have agreed to provide sidewalks to the pool areas. If they were to do the required landscaping, they would lose some units, but there have been no objections to the lack of landscape buffering. Third, there was currently no upland buffer, but the 15-foot requirement from SFWMD would serve as the setback from the wetland and the buffer requirement. Lastly, he restated that the Community School was allowing the 5 feet on their property and he felt that was sufficient. Mr. Duane also submitted support letters for the record. Mr. Abernathy was concerned about the sidewalk issue. Mr. Budd commented that it was dark when both workers and children went to work and school. Mr. Schmitt noted that staff was aware of this issue and they would need to come up with something. George Hermanson - Hole Montes, Inc. Mr. Hermanson stated that they would make sure there was a sidewalk connection to Phase 1 and they would designate 4 feet of the road for a walkway. Mr. Abernathy asked about street lighting, and Mr. Hermanson agreed to provide this as well. Mr. Abernathy said he could accept either alternative, and Mr. Hermanson said that they would do both. Russ Muller - Engineering Department Mr. Muller stated that restriping was not preferred and he would rather see the walkways go through Phase 1 to get to Pine Ridge Road. Mr. Richardson stated that he was satisfied with the Community School commitment, the landscape buffering and the upland buffer. Peter Catuzzi Mr. Catuzzi stated that there were very few children in the neighborhood at this point, so the sidewalk issue was minor to them. He would like to have this approved. He added that they could put bumpers in the neighborhood in order to slow down traffic. Mr. Abernathy closed the public hearing. Mr. Strain motioned to forward petition PUDA-2002-AR-2028 with a recommendation for approval based on the following stipulations: 1) they 1 15 Je modify the sidewalk plan on the northern side and come to a conclusion to provide sidewalks to Pine Ridge Road as well as street lighting, 2) the 15-foot buffer be waived to 5 feet and they will maintain the 10 feet on the neighboring property, 3) the buffers between the buildings be maintained as planned and they utilize landscaping elsewhere in the project, and 4) they reduce the structural buffer and retain the wetland applications. Mr. Budd seconded the motion. Mr. Bellows suggested that they add the minimum 5% requirement for low- income housing. Mr. Duane suggested they add that the 15 feet would serve as the buffer and the setback requirement. Mr. Strain added this to the motion. Passed unanimously. RZ-2001-AR-1143 There were 4 persons sworn in for this hearing. Mr. Adelstein noted that this item had been previously approved, but was back due to misadvertising. They agreed to hear directly from the public. Marie Ingram - Ms. Ingram owns a house directly across the street from the property in question. She mentioned a 1972 zoning map which designated the property as a park site, and she felt this was never rezoned. She noted they had deed restrictions to this site. Ms. Ingram noted that there were 18 criteria for zoning changes. She stated that this was not conducive since it was 3 blocks from an overcrowded elementary school and it would increase traffic, especially during the construction phase. She said that it would adversely affect the property values in the neighborhood. She felt it would grant the developer a special privilege by being allowed a higher density. She felt there were other adequate sites for this project, and the developer knew it was deed restricted when he purchased it. Lastly, she believed it would compromise the health, safety and welfare of the public. She was concerned about the taking of greenspace and the increased density. She added that the space was held for civic use only. Marjorie Student restated that deed restrictions would not affect this and were not enforced by the county. Mr. Bellows stated that the current zoning map had this zoned as RSF-3. Tracy Ingram - Mr. Ingram mentioned how the developer has cut corners, and he described the inappropriate signs, which were never professionally done even after being asked by the county. Mr. Ingram felt that this was an indication that the houses would not be built to the highest quality. Mr. Strain noted that the density would be RSF-5, but the developer would build at RSF-3 standards. Mr. Bellows stated that this complied with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Budd stated that the developer was supposed to have a more professional sign and he was very disappointed to hear that this was not done. He agreed that this would lead Mr. Ingram to believe that the houses may be low quality. Mr. O'Gara Mr. O'Gara stated that he had to redo the signs three different times, so he was trying to keep the costs down because signs can be costly. Mr. Abernathy closed the public hearing. 16 July 18 & 19, 2002 16J Mr. Strain motioned to forward petition RZ-2001-AR-1143 with a recommendation of approval subject to the original stipulations, Mr. Budd seconded. Mr. Wolfley disclosed that he spoke with Mr. O'Gara about the project. Mr. Richardson stated ~hat he was sympathetic to the deed restriction. Passed unanimously. K. PETITION ST-2194 There were 8 persons sworn in for this hearing. Mr. Strain disclosed that he met with the applicant and two agents to discuss the wetland issue. Mr. Wolfley disclosed that he spoke with Mr. Pires, Mr. Landy and Mr. Morton. Mr. Budd also spoke with Mr. Pires, Mr. Landy and Mr. Morton. Mr. Bellows stated the petitioner was requesting a Special Treatment Development permit and that the development would impact 82% of the wetlands. This project was located an urban mixed-use district within the activity center. He stated that it was consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Steve Lenberger - Mr. Lenberger noted that the ST overlay was over the entire parcel. The project was permitted by the SFWMD, but they required mitigation. They were also required to preserve. 1 acres of native vegetation. Staff believed that · impacting 82% of the S.T. area was not consistent of the special treatment regulations. Staff recommended denial of this project. He added that the EAC unanimously supported their recommendation of denial. Mr. Strain questioned what would remain if this was preserved since sheet flow no longer existed. He wasn't sure of the value of retaining this land in an activity center verse mitigating it elsewhere. Mr. Lenberger stated that staff believed that the land was valuable. Mrs. Young asked if there had been a study of the water flow system. Mr. Wolfley noted that Falling Waters had stopped all the water flow in the area. Mr. Lenberger stated that it was an isolated wetland, but that didn't mean it was not viable. Anthony Pires - Woodward, Pires & Lombardo Mr. Pires noted that when the SFWMD issued the permits for Falling Waters, they recognized that these would not be viable wetlands. He stated that viable, naturally functioning wetlands do not occur anymore. He noted that the control elevation was at 5 feet, but the ditch was at 3 feet. Mr. Pires asked for approval of this item with additional native vegetation landscaping. Mike Landy - Landy Engineering Mr. Landy stated that he had sent out a survey crew and this land would not receive hydrology from the adjacent properties. Mr. Strain asked if he felt this was viable as greenspace for Collier County, which was required by the code. Mr. Landy did not feel it was and he added they had a mitigation plan for the lost greenspace. Mr. Strain asked if the EAC felt these wetlands were viable, and Mr. Landy stated that they did. Mr. Abemathy stated it was fanciful to expect to preserve wetlands in an activity center and he felt the social good may be to allow mitigation. RayAnn Boylen - Boylen Engineering Consultants 17 July 18 & 19, 2002 Ms. Boylen confirmed that there was no longer sheet flow on this property. Mr. Strain asked how many mitigation credits were purchased offsite, and Ms. Boylen answered 1.68 credits were purchased. Mr. Strain asked why they had calculated such a low ration. Ms. Boylen replied that they were ranked according to their functional value. Mario Curiale - Adjacent Property owner Mr. Curiale stated that they should keep greenspace as large portions, rather than small pieces here and there. He would like to see the money used for mitigation, and he added that Rookery Bay could use some money. Mr. Abernathy closed the public hearing. Mr. Budd agreed that greenspace was important, but he felt this was too close to the activity center. Mr. Budd motioned to forward petition ST.2194 with a recommendation for approval, Mr. Abernathy seconded. Mr. Strain asked to consider adding a .65~acre enhancement for greenspace, a requirement to open the property to interconnection to Mr. Curiale, and also if there was any viability to interconnect to the north. Mr, Budd added these conditions to the motion. The motion carried 5 for and 2 against, with Mr. Richardson and Mr. Adelstein voting against the motion. Le ST-99-03 There were 10 persons sworn in for this hearing. Mr. Reischl stated the applicant was requesting a permit for 1.5 units per acre density in a Special Treatment Overlay District for 109 lots. The proposed impact to the wetlands was less than 10 acres. They are required to retain 25% native vegetation, but they are proposing to maintain 43%. They have increased the gopher tortoise area to 14.5 acres. Mr. Strain, Mr. Budd and Mr. Wolfley disclosed that they spoke with Mr. Farmer and Ms. Ryan. The EAC made no recommendation for this because there was a motion for and a motion against the petition. Staff recommended approval. Mr. Abernathy asked if they have taken into account the Conservancy's position. Mr. Reischl noted that he has had talks with Barbara Ferguson and Nicole Ryan and he believed their concerns were addressed. David Farmer - Keystone Custom Homes Mr. Farmer explained the original site plan. He stated that the new plan was only impacting 10 acres of the wetlands. He noted that the 14.5 acres for gopher tortoises has now been tied to six other preserves. He added that they have 200% of the high- quality gopher tortoise requirement. He noted that there were no clubhouses proposed on this site. He mentioned that they were preserving 99% of the onsite wetlands. He stated they were going to dedicate 109 lots into the MSTU of Palm River for roads, etc. Mr. Farmer said that this would never be a gated community. 18 July 18 & 19, 2002 I 1 He stated that they were working with the Conservancy to meet some of t~r ~} d suggestions. He added that this project exceeds all of the LDC requirements. Mr. Strain questioned about the increase of construction traffic. Mr. Farmer stated that they were willing to talk about construction timing. Anthony Pires - Attorney representing Palm River Homeowner's Association Mr. Pires stated that there has been an increase in gopher tortoises since the EIS was conducted. He felt that a thorough study should be conducted before this is approved by the BCC. He noted minutes from the EAC meeting of February 13, 2001, where the applicant agreed to several stipulations. Mr. Pires read these stipulations to the commission and he felt that all of these needed to be part of the recommendation. Kevin Barnhill - Palm River resident Mr. Barnhill stated that they have come a long way. He urged the commission to attach the stipulations discussed by Mr. Pires and the Conservancy. Nicole Ryan - The Conservancy of SW Florida Ms. Ryan stated that she e-mailed the comments to the commission. The Conservancy feels that this land should not be developed and should be preserved due to the large number of gopher tortoises. She noted that Ray Ashton, gopher tortoise expert, reviewed the plans and submitted recommendations on how the tortoises should be protected if development should proceed. The Conservancy urged that the petition be contingent on the Conservancy's recommendations. She noted that they have reached consensus on many of the issues. She stated that Goal 6 of the GMP discusses the need to protect gopher tortoises, as well as policy 3.11.3.4, sub 1 of the LDC. Mr. Abernathy asked if she felt that staff was on the right track, and Ms. Ryan agreed. Mr. Reischl stated that they changed some of the language for clarity, but they have the same intent. John Belt - Treasurer of Palm River Homeowner's Association Mr. Belt stated that the developer has come a long way, but he didn't feel the developer had worked very well with the homeowner's in the area. He urged the commission to recommend the stipulations discussed by Mr. Pires. He was also concerned about the safety. Charles Healy - President of Palm River Homeowner's Association Mr. Healy was also concerned about safety. Robert McConnell - Collier's Reserve Mr. McConnell stated that he would like to see this remain as greenspace, but they recognize the right to property. They were concerned about the gopher tortoise population. They agreed with the Conservancy's position. Mr. Farmer stated that he tried very well to inform the residents of Palm River and provided information to them. He asked if the commission would use the letter that he submitted for the stipulations, rather than Mr. Pires. Mr. Farmer stated that the 19 IX. Xe XI. XII. XIII. Me July 18 & 19, 2002 prescribed burn was what he was not happy about. Mr. Wolfley asked if ~co~uld3 1 manually remove the undergrowth. Mr. Farmer said that this was feasible, but it would be more expensive, although he was willing to do whatever needed to be done. Mr. Farmer noted that the number of tortoises has increased by 10 since the last survey. Mr. Strain asked if he was in agreement with the survey requirement. Mr." Farmer agreed and said it was also a stipulation of the state permit. He added he was willing to agree to have Mr. Ashton available onsite. Mr. Strain asked if he was willing to provide speed bumps or speed humps. Mr. Farmer stated that he was willing to provide speed bumps. Mr. Garcia replied that speed humps were preferred by the transportation department. Mr. Farmer said that was fine. Mr. Abemathy closed the public hearing. Mr. Budd motioned to forward petition ST-99-03 with a recommendation for approval along with staff's stipulations and the letter from Mr. Farmer, not Mr. Pires, as well as a manual remove of vegetation, Mr. Richardson seconded. Passed unanimously. CP-2000-6 Mrs. Young motioned to continue this petition to Friday, August 1, 2002, Mr. Strain seconded. Bruce Anderson stated that he would be out of town on August 1, 2002. It was decided that this would be continued to Friday, July 19th at 8:30 a.m. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business at this time. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Abernathy addressed the issue of a second meeting in August. It was decided to forgo the August 15, 2002 meeting. Mr. Budd stated that Mike Reagan had developed some language for the commission to review regarding the distribution of information at the meetings. Mr. Reagan distributed this language to the commission. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEMS There were no public comments at this time. DISCUSSION OF THE ADDENDA There were no public comments at this time. CONTINUATION The meeting was continued at 8:00 p.m. 20 July 18 & 19, 2002 Collier County Planning Commission County Commissioners Boardroom Building F, 3ra Floor 3301 Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34104 16J MINUTES July 19, 2002 ATTENDANCE Members: Chairman Kenneth Abemathy Russell A. Budd Mark Strain Dwight Richardson Lora Jean Young Lindy Adelstein Staff: Marjorie Student - Assistant County Attorney David Weeks - Planning Services Others: Bruce Anderson Ron Talone Paul Owen Josh Evans Mr. Abernathy called the continuation of the July 18, 2002 meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. Mr. Abernathy stated there was only one petition to consider this morning. ARINGS 21 July 18 & 19, 2002 16J David Weeks noted that there was a citizen courtesy notification sign-up sheet available. He stated this was a transmittal hearing, not an adoption hearing. He stated that this was a Comp Plan amendment related to the DRI. Mr. Abernathy stated that there was no need for disclosures, and Marjorie Student agreed. Mr. Weeks described the location of the site. He stated that the only issue was a provision to allow 30,000 square feet of commercial inside the Agricultural-Rural portions. Staff did not feel this was consistent with the Rural Fringe amendments because they only allow commercial within the Rural Village center. Mr. Richardson asked how this applied to the Rural Village concept. Mr. Weeks stated that this fits the provision in the Rural Fringe amendments for density blending. Staff believed they would comply other than the interior commercial aspect. Mr. Weeks noted that the petitioner would be eligible if this were strictly residential. He added that they were asking for less dwelling units than the maximum. Mr. Richardson said he was confused because he thought that they were required to purchase TDR credits. Mr. Weeks stated that they were eligible to use the credits because they were in the receiving lands, but they were not proposing to since they were asking for density blending. Mr. Abernathy noted that if they use TDRs than they would have to construct a village, and Mr. Weeks agreed. Mr. Strain stated that they were proposing 54 holes of golf, so they were supposed to purchase TDRs. Mr. Weeks stated he wasn't sure because this was a density blending issue. Mr. Strain said this was the one concern he had expressed over golf courses and he thought a provision had been added to require golf courses to buy TDRs. Mr. Richardson added that they did not want to gut the TDR program before it even got started. Mr. Weeks was not sure if the requirement to purchase TDRs existed. Mr. Weeks stated that from the DRI transportation analysis showed potential impact, but the numbers would become more concrete at a later stage, at the DRI and rezone. He stated that the application submitted did not define commercial parameters, which staff felt was way too vague, and the issue was now resolved. In the language referring to clustering, staff recommended changing the word "may" to "shall", but they were okay with either word. He stated that they would cluster even without the word "shall". Mr. Strain noted on page 10, it stated that "the applicant should work with county staff", "the applicant should make changes recommended by staff", and "changes should include text". Mr. Weeks stated he would change "should" to "shall" in those three cases. Mr. Richardson asked how the applicant could address the adverse impacts. Mr. Weeks stated they could use phasing of the project, make construction improvements, pay money to the county, or a combination of these. Mr. Strain asked if staff was under the impression that the mining was going to stop once it became residential because the DRI said that they were going to continue mining. Mr. Weeks stated it was not uncommon for a project to do both, but at the adoption phase, this would become more concrete. Bruce Anderson - Agent for the applicant, U.S. Home Corporation Mr. Anderson stated that he would attempt to answer all the questions, but there were some questions that they were not able to answer at this stage. Mr. Strain asked where they disagreed with staff. Mr. Anderson stated that were in agreement with 22 most of the language changes, but they disagreed with the use of the word "consistency". In regards to clustering, they were more comfortable with the word "may" because there was no definition of clustering. Mr. Anderson noted that the density was capped at 1100 homes less than they were allowed. The applicant was claiming zero density based on Rural Fringe. Also, they were requesting 700 dwelling units less than allowed in the urban area. He noted it was reviewed by and recommended for approval by the Rural Fringe Assessment Committee. He added that they were required to preserve 40% of the existing native vegetation, but they were retaining at least 90%. He respectfully disagreed with staff on the internal commercial neighborhood centers. They were requesting a Comp Plan amendment for this in case the Rural Fringe gets challenged. He noted that Florida Wildlife Federation, the Conservancy of SW Florida, and the Collier County Audubon Society had no objections to this plan amendment. He believed the neighborhood centers were allowed by the Rural Fringe amendments. He stated that they would capture car trips for everyday use, which would decrease traffic on county roads. He thought this employed good smart growth concepts. Mr. Richardson asked if the neighborhood centers were within a gated community and not available to the public, and Mr. Anderson agreed. Mr. Anderson stated that Dr. Nichols felt that density blending would have no effect on the TDR process. Mr. Strain asked if they were planning on purchasing TDRs, and Mr. Anderson stated they were not. Mr. Strain stated that they thought the intent of the discussion during the TDR review was to require golf courses to be attached to the TDR process. Mr. Anderson stated that there was a distinction drawn in the Rural Fringe Amendment language between projects that were subject to density blending and the rest of the Rural Fringe. Mr. Weeks added that language was structured so that there was a provision for density blending projects and non-density blending golf courses. Mr. Abernathy was concerned how they could exclude 4 receiving sections from the TDR program and it would have no effect. Mr. Anderson stated that he viewed density blending as an internal form of transfer of development rights. He added that their project did not exacerbate urban sprawl. He noted that they have been requested by county to reserve right-of-way along the Westside for the extension of 951, and they have agreed to do so. Ron Talone - David Plummet and Associates Mr. Talone stated that there was at least an 1100 unit reduction, which would reduce the potential traffic impacts. He stated they would reduce impacts to public roads by providing commercial centers and recreational activities. He stated there would be internal connections to the activity center. He noted that there would be impacts whether or not it was adopted, but it would be fully mitigated. Mr. Richardson said that next time he would like to understand interconnections to the Northeast activity center. Mr. Abernathy closed the public hearing. 23 Mr. Budd motioned to forward petition CP-2000-6 with a recommendation to transmit to the DCA along with staff's stipulations, the modified sewer language, the changes in text provided in the handout by Mr. Weeks, the language modified to "shall", and the "may" reference to clustering, Mr. Adeistein seconded. Mr. Strain recommended they amend the motion to allow that the golf course provisions of this project will use TDRs in the language for the rates that are dictated outside the density blending provision. Mr. Budd accepted the modification to the motion, Mrs. Young seconded. Mr. Weeks stated that by their motion, they are requiring a link to the TDRs. If the Rural Fringe amendments do not go forward, then at the adoption hearing, then they could add TDR language to this application. Mr. Anderson stated that the TDR requirement was to guarantee that there was a minimum density associated with golf courses and to encourage the purchase of TDRs. Mr. Strain stated not "and", "or", and he stated this was the way to kick off the TDR process. Mr. Anderson noted that they were not even using all of density that was allowable. Mr. Strain stated that this was the opposite direction that receiving areas were supposed to go. Mr, Anderson said that this may make this project unfeasible. Mr. Richardson added that they liked the project, but they were trying to mesh the best parts of all. The motion passed unanimously. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10:10 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION KENNETH ABERNATHY, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF MANPOWER SERVICES, INC., BY AMBER M. FREDERIKSEN, RPR. 24 16LI DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFIC AS OF MAY 20, 2003 16L3 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 20, 2003 16L4 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 20, 2003 16L5 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 20, 2003 To: Clerk to the Board: COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Please place the following as a: 7A XXX NormalLegal Advertisement [] Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dept/Div: Comm. Dev. Serv./Planning Person: Ray Bellows Date: Petition No. (If none, give brief description): PUDA-2002-AR-2559 Petitioner: (Name & Address): RWA, Inc., Dwight Nadeau, 3050 N. Horseshoe Dr., Suite 270, Naples, Fl. 34104 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Waterways Joint Venture IV, 914 Grand Rapids Blvd., Naples, Fl. 34120 Hearing before El BCC [] BZA [] Other Requested Hearing date:__October 8, 2002 Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News [] Other [] Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: PUDA-2002-AR-2559, Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc., representing Waterways Joint Venture IV, requesting an'amendment to the Hibiscus Village PUD to revise Table I to add development standards to the multi-family land uses to facilitate the opportunity to subdivide lands in a multi-family tract for fee simple conveyance. The changes to Table 1 are as follows: 1. Provide multi-family development standards for Mioimum Lot Area, where the existing ordinance exempts multi-family land uses from compliance with that development standard; 2. Provide a Minimum Lot Width for both interior lots as well as comer lots, where the existing ordinance exempts multi-family land uses from compliance with that development standard; 3. Add a new reference note associated with a required Side Yard for all 1, 2, and 3-story multi-family buildings such that required side yards would be measured from the exterior wall of the principal structure, and that there is no side yard requirement between interior units of a unified principal structure where fee simple lots are created for each dwelling unit; Renumbering of subsequent development standard related notes, to accommodate the new note described aboveThe subject property is located at 14625 Collier Boulevard, in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 57.82± acres. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? [] Yes [] No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 113-138312-649110 (~ed by: } Division I-~ad Approved by: County Manager Date List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. Date Received: ~/Z~/~2 Date of Public hea~g: Z DateAdveffised: ffaM~ 17A ORDINANCE NO. 02 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2000-76, KNOWN AS THE HIBISCUS VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO TABLE I OF SUBSECTION 3.4.A, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO ADD MINIMUM LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH STANDARDS FOR THE MULTI-FAMILY CATEGORY AND TO ADD A NOTE ADDING SIDE YARD SETBACK STANDARDS FOR INTERIOR UNITS OF A UNIFIED PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE; SECTION TWO: AMENDING SUBSECTION 5.4.A, SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT AND MONITORING REPORT TO REFLECT THE CURRENT PUD TIME LIMIT REQUIREMENTS; AND SECTION THREE: AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 28, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 2000-76, which established the Hibiscus Village Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc., representing Waterways Joint Venture IV~ petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to amend Ordinance 2000-76. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY the Board Of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO TABLE I OF SUBSECTION 3.4.A ENTITLED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Table 1 of Subsection 3.4.A, entitled Development Standards, of Ordinance Number 2000-76, the Hibiscus Village PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY TWO-FAMILY Minimum Lot Area (per unit) Minimum Lot Width Front Yard Setback Side Yard Setback 1 Story 2 Story 3Story 7,000 Sq. Ft. 4,500 Sq. Ft. 60' Interior Lots (1) 80' Interior Lots (1) (40')(2) 70' Comer Lots 100' Comer Lots (509(2) 20' 20' 0' & 12' or both 6' 0'& 12' or both 6' 0'& 15' or both 7.5' 0'& 15' orboth 7.5' NA NA MULTI-FAMILY NA 2500 Sq. Ft. NA 25' Interior Lots NA 35' Comer Lots 15' Greater of 7.5' or ½ BH (3) Greater of 10' or ½ BH (3) Greater of 12.5' or '/2 BH (3) Rear Yard Setback Principal Structure 20' 20' 20'(-3-) (4) Accessory Structure 10' 10' I 0' Words s~.:'ck tk:eugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 1 t7A STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY TWO-FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY PUD Boundary Setback Principal Structure Accessory Structure Lake Setback (4-) (5) Wetland Preserve Area Setback Distance Between Structures Main/Principal 1 -Story 2-Story 3-Story Accessory Structures Maximum Height Principal Building Accessory Building Minimum Floor Area NA NA NA NA 20' 20' 25' 25' Greater of 20' or BH 10' 20' 25' 10' 10' 15' 15' 15' 20' NA NA 20' 10' 10' 10' 35' with a maximum of 2 stories 20'/Clubhouse 35' 1200 Sq. Ft. (1) May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots. 35' with a maximum of 2 stories 20'/Clubhouse 35' 1100 Sq. Ft. 45' with a maximum of 3 stories 20'/Clubhouse 35' 1 bedroom = 600 Sq. FL 2 bedroom= 750 Sq. Ft. 3 bedroom = 900 Sq. Ft. (2) Minimum lot frontage in parenthesis applies in cases where a dwelling unit in a 2-family structure is on an individually platted lot. (3) Where fee simple lots are created for each dwelling unit, no side yard shall be required between interior units of a unified principal structure, and the required side yard shall be measured from the exterior wall(s) of the principal structure. (-3-)(4) All 3-story buildings shall also be set back a minimum of 150' from the Collier Boulevard right-of-way. (4) (5) Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake. Note: "BH" refers to building height and "SBH" refers to the sum of the building heights. SECTION TWO: AMENDMENTS TO SUBSECTION 5.4.A. ENTITLED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT. Section 5.4.A, entitled Sechedule of Development/Monitoring Report Ordinance Number 2000-76, the Hibiscus Village PUD is hereby amended to read as follows: of A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the three-year time limits pursuant to Section 2.7.3.4 of the Land Develioment Code. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this __ day of ,2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Words s~ack tSrcugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2 17A Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency Mmj-ori~Vl. S:tudent - - Assistant County Attorney PUDA-2002-AR-2559, Hibiscus Village RB/sp Words sW-'-zk t~:zugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 3 August 30, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUDA-2002-AR-2559 Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Sunday, September 22, 2002 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Carleen A. Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: 113-138312-649110 17A ' NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2000-76, KNOWN AS THE HIBISCUS VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO TABLE I OF SUBSECTION 3.4.A, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO ADD MINIMUM LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH STANDARDS FOR THE MULTI-FAMILY CATEGORY AND TO ADD A NOTE ADDING SIDE YARD SETBACK STANDARDS FOR INTERIOR UNITS OF A UNIFIED PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE; SECTION TWO: AMENDING SUBSECTION 5.4.A, SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT AND MONITORING REPORT TO REFLECT THE CURRENT PUD TIME LIMIT REQUIREMENTS; AND SECTION THREE: AN EFFECTIVE DATE Petition PUDA-2002-AR-2559, Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc., representing Waterways Joint Venture IV, requesting an amendment to the Hibiscus Village PUD to revise Table I to add development standards to the multi-family land uses to facilitate the opportunity to subdivide lands in a multi-family tract for fee simple conveyance. The changes to Table I are as follows: 1. Provide multi-family development standards for Minimum Lot Area, where the existing ordinance exempts multi-family land uses from compliance with that development standard; 2. Provide a Minimum Lot Width for both interior lots as well as corner lots, where the existing ordinance exempts multi-family land uses from compliance with that development standard; 3. Add a new reference note associated with a required Side Yard for all 1,2, and 3-story multi-family buildings such that required side yards would be measured from the exterior wall of the principal structure, and that there is no side yard requirement between interior units of a unified principal structure where fee simple lots are created for each dwelling unit; Renumbering of subsequent development standard related notes, to accommodate the new note described above. The subject property is located at 14625 Collier Boulevard, in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 57.82± acres A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk ( SEAL ) Carleen A. Edwards To: Subject: legals@naplesnew.com PUDA-2002-AR-2559 17A Attached herein is advertising for September 22, 2002 Thank you. PUDA-2002-AR-255 PUDA-2002-AR-255 9.doc 9.doc..dot Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@clerk.collier.fi.us Friday, August 30, 2002 4:38 PM Carleen A. Edwards Delivery Status Notification (Relay) 17A [;3 ATT07770,txt PUDA-2002-AR-255 9 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals@naplesnews.com 17A August 30, 2002 RWA, Inc. Dwight Nadeau 3050 N. Horseshoe Drive, Suite 270 Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUDA-2002-AR-2559 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, September 22, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Carleen A. Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure August 30, 2002 Waterways Joint Venture IV 914 Grand Rapids Blvd. Naples, Florida 34120 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUDA-2002-AR-2559 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, September 22, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Carleen A. Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure NapLes DaiLy News NapLes, FL 34102 Affidavit of PubLication Naples Daily_News BOARD OF COUNTY CONNISSIONERS CHERI LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 lq31383126491 58523841 PUDA-2002-AR-2559 NO State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily Ne~s, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attachad copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said HapLes Daily Hews is a newspaper published at HapLes, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said news~per has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class alter at the ~t office in Naples, in ~aid Collier County, Florida, for a per1~ of 1 year next prec~ing the first publication of the attach~ copy of advertiseaent/ and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promis~ any person, firm or cat,ration any discount~ recta, coa~ission or refund for the pur~se of securing this advertisement for publiction in the sa~d news~per. PUBLISHED ON: AD SPACE: ~87.~ IHCH F~LEO ON: 09/23/02 PUDA-2002-AR-2559 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice Is hereby given th(If on Tuesday, O~ 8, 2002, In the Board- room, 3rd F oar, Admin- istration Bulldlng, Cailler County GOvernment Center, 3301 EUst Tamla- mi Trail,. Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will cea- sld~ 1be enactment of a meeting will commence. at ~,00 ANt. The rifle m Is ~ tallo~ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDI- NANCE NUMB~,R 2000-Z6, K NOWH_~G5 FOR: SECTION ONE:I AMENDMENTS TOI TABLE I OF SUBS~C-I TION 3,4.A. OGVELOP-/ MENT STANDARDS! TO ADD MINIMUM LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH STANDARDS FOR THE MULTI- FAM i L-?~.,C.A~T-GG O R y AND TO ADD A NOT~ ADOING SIDE YARD SETBACK STAN- DARDS FOR INTERI- OR UNITS OF A UN- IFIED PRINCIPALE ~~'NOTE: All I)ersans wh STRUCTURE' SEC-I ~' i~'"~'~anany TION TWO: 'AN~ND- J the Ceunty reg~fer w lNG SUBSECTION[ Maneger to Presentation of f $.4.~, SCHEDULE afl agenda Itom fo be DEVELOPMENT AND J MO.,TO.,.= RE-, ~ORT TO REFLECT THE CURRENT PUD mlnufl~ on any Itom. T TIM~ LIMIT REQUIRE[-L selection of an Indlvldm MENTS; AND SEC-I ta ~oq<~. on behalf of*, TION'THREE: AN EF- organlzaflen er g~oup .enco~'..aged. If recognlz, FECTIVEDATE [ ay the Chairman, Pet tlon PUDA- 2002.AR-2559, Dwight No- spokespersan for a ar~ I deau of RWA, Inc., rap~l or arganlzahan may ~e Isenflng Wof~ways. Jont/ Iottodi0mlnutostosg~ an an Item. I Venture IV, requesnng anl | amendment ta the Hlbls- Persons wishing fo ha, | cub V lage PUD to revise wr..1~ or grapl~lc mat~ [Table I ~o add develop-! als Included In the Bee; /ment standards to the, aqg~k~.packets must su /multi.family land uses to l mit suld material a mi /facilitate the opparl~n_ Hy Imum of 3 weeks prior |to subdivide lands In a the respective publ | multi-family tract for fee hearlng, In any case, wr /simple conveyance. The ten materials Intended [changes to Table ~ are as be considered by ff /tallows: 1. Provide multi- Board shall be submlffe /tomlly develooment sion- fg. the appraprlato Cour~ /dards for Minimum Lot sm~ a manlmum of seve [Area, where the 'existing days prior to the publ /ardlnance exempts multi- .hearln~ All material use · famlly land uses tram ~mn Presentations betof compliance wflh that de- the Board will become velopment standard; 2. permanent part of the n Provide a Minimum Lot cord.. as well as corner Iot~ ' ta ~ a declslan of i where the exl~fdnQ___e~.~l- /Any person who decide ~ nance exeml~s mu.~- Board will need a recto i family lemd uses from of the procnedlngs iCO.m4)llanc.e ~.wl~h__:_ff~_~ dej raining thereto an veiopmerrr 5"mnauru; Add a new reference note therefare~ associated w th a re. ensure ~at a ved3aflr i qulred Side Yard for all record of the procoedlnQ Is made, which record 1,2, and 3-story ma|fl-tam-J cludes fha testimony an IFy bulldlngs such that re-I evlden~:e__, upon which th qulred side. ~ards. would[ be measures |rom roe.ex:| BaP0AA~D3ealisbased.oF COUNT' [terlor Wall of the prlnclpaH COMMI,~SIONERS Islruoture, and that th?e! COLLIER COUNTY lis no side yard regum.re-/ FLORIDA |ment between Inmrlor. j JAMES N. COLETT~ | units of a unified prlncmpm/ [sfl'ucture where f~. sl.m-J /pie lots are ~ lor/ CHAIRMAN C0.L~HT E. BROCK each ~well~ un~. ,~. By: CU __9~,?n Edward. numbering of suDseqlJe~ ~.~.m"K I develapmenf standard re- Ikdnd notes, to Ick~ the new na~ /scribed above. suMect Is ~a /shl~ 48 South, Raflge ', i~, Cailler COunty, FI~ B~ A ~y of the (~-~nco is on Time .w~ the Clerk to the ~ra a Is aval~b~ ~' Inspection. All Interes'md parties, fire Invl~d ta at.nd and be heard. ORDINANCE NO. 02 - 4 6 1-7A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2000-76, KNOWN AS THE HIBISCUS VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO TABLE I OF SUBSECTION 3.4.A, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO ADD MINIMUM LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH STANDARDS FOR THE MULTI-FAMILY CATEGORY AND TO ADD A NOTE ADDING SIDE YARD SETBACK STANDARDS FOR INTERIOR UNITS OF A UNIFIED PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE; SECTION TWO: AMENDING SUBSECTION 5.4.A, SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT AND MONITORING REPORT TO REFLECT THE CURRENT PUD TIME LIMIT REQUIREMENTS; AND SECTION THREE: AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 28, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 2000-76, which established the Hibiscus Village Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc., representing Waterways Joint Venture IV, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to amend Ordinance 2000-76. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY the Board Of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO TABLE I OF SUBSECTION 3.4.A ENTITLED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Table 1 of Subsection 3.4.A, entitled Development Standards, of Ordinance Number 2000-76, the Hibiscus Village PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: TABLE I STANDARDS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY TWO-FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY Minimum Lot Area (per unit) Minimum Lot Width Front Yard Setback Side Yard Setback I Story 2 StoW 3Story Rear Yard Setback 7,000 Sq. Ft. 4,500 Sq. Ft. NA 2500 Sq. Ft. 60' Interior Lots (1) 80' Interior Lots (1)~ 25' Interior Lots (40')(2) 70' Comer Lots 100' Comer Lots NA 35' Comer Lots (50')(2) 20' 20' 15' 0' & 12' or both 6' 0'& 12' or both 6' 0'& 15' or both 7.5' 0'& 15' or both 7.5' ]qA . NA [', Greater of 7.5' or ½ BH (3) Greater of 10' or ½ BH (3) Greater of 12.5' or ½ BH (3) Principal Structure 20' 20' 20'(-3-) (4) Accessory Structure 10' 10' 10' are deleted; words underlined are added. 1 STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY TWO-FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY PUD Boundary Setback Principal Structure Accessory Structure Lake Setback (-4-) (5) Wetland Preserve Area Setback Distance Between Structures Main/Principal 1-Story 2-Story 3-Story Accessory Structures Maximum Height Principal Building Accessory Building Minimum Floor Area NA NA Gremerof20'or BH NA NA 10' 20' 20' 20' 25' 25' 25' 10' 10' 15' 15' 15' 20' NA NA 20' 10' 10' 10' 35' with a maximum of 2 stories 20'/Clubhouse 35' 1200 Sq. Ft. (1) May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots. 35' with a maximum of 2 stories 20'/Clubhouse 35' 1100 Sq. Ft. 45' with a maximum of 3 stories 20'/Clubhouse 35' 1 bedroom = 600 Sq. Ft. 2 bedroom= 750 Sq. Ft. 3 bedroom = 900 Sq. Ft. (2) Minimum lot frontage in parenthesis applies in cases where a dwelling unit in a 2-family structure is on an individually platted lot. (3) Where fee simple lots are created for each dwelling unit, no side yard shall be required between interior units of a unified principal structure, and the required side yard shall be measured from the exterior wall{s) of the principal structure. (--3-)(4) All 3-story buildings shall also be set back a minimum of 150' from the Collier Boulevard right-of-way. (-4-) (5) Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake. Note: "BH" refers to building height and "SBH" refers to the sum of the building heights. SECTION TWO: AMENDMENTS TO SUBSECTION 5.4.A. ENTITLED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT. Section 5.4.A, entitled Schedule of Development/Monitoring Report Ordinance Number 2000-76, the Hibiscus Village PUD is hereby amended to read as follows: of A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the three-year time limits pursuant to Section 2.7.3.4 of the Land Development Code. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ~'J~Jday of ~ ,2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JA~O~lz ~'1 ~ ~N Words struck tb~cug.5 are deleted; words underlined are added. 2 Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency Mmj-ori~i~Vi. S-rodent Assistant County Attorney PUDA-2002-AR-2559, Hibiscus Village RB/sp Words s~ac!t t?:m:gh are deleted; words underlined are added. 3 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2002-46 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 8th day of October, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 9th day of October, 2002. By: DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk' Ex-officio to Board o~ County Commissioners Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk To: Clerk to the Board: COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Please place the following as a: XXX Normal Legal Advertisement [] Other. (Display Adv., location, etc.) .~.~. Originating Dcpt/Div: Coram. Dev. ServJPlanning Persom Date: Petition No. (H none, give brief description):PUDZ-2001-AR-1331, ASGM Buzine~ Ceat~ of Naples Petitioner:. (Name & Address): R. Brace Anderson, Young vanAssende~, Vamad~ & Anderson, 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300, Naples, FL 34108 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: Ma~n S. Adler, 4 Caramel Court, Co~k, NY 11725 Hearing before [] BCC [] BZA ri Other Requested Hearing date: October 8, 2002 Based on advcriiseamnt appearing 15 days befm hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only ff important): XXX Naples Daily News [] Other ri Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & co,,,,,on location & Size: PUDZ-2001-AR-1331, R. Bru~ Anclex~on, of Young van Assendezp, Varnadoe & Anderson, representing Martin S. Adler, n~lUes~g a rm~n~ f, om "A" Rural Agriculture to 'PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD for a ~ Pa~k on ~ loca~ app, o~ately 114 mile south of Manatee Road on Collier Boulevard, the property si~ is immedia~ sou~ of the F~hue Outlet Center in Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 40.8~_.+ acr~ Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: ~' Does Petition Fee include advertising cost?. [] Yes [] No If Yes, what account should b~ chazg~ for advertising costs: 113-138312-649110 .~ by: ~ Approved by:. List Attachments: Coumy Mmag~ Date DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating per,on to complete one ropy ~d obt~n Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: H legal document is involved, be sure tlmt any necessary legal review, er request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Mmmg~. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda ~e: to ri Requesting Division [] originai Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to CI~ ORi~,'t~-taiuing a copy for file. &&&& '-&&&&-' '- CLimeS O LY- ORDINANCE NO. 02-__ 17B AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 1610N; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A" RURAL AGRICULTURE TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS "ASGM BUSINESS CENTER OF NAPLES" PUD LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE SOUTH OF MANATEE ROAD ON COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR #951) IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 40.88+/ ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, R. Bruce Anderson, of Young, vanAssenderp, Varnadoe and Anderson, representing Martin S. Alder, Richard L. Schwartz, Herbert Garil, and Marvin Meyerson, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "A" Rural Agriculture to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the "ASGM Business Center" PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 1610N, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ~ day of .,2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES N COLETTA., CHAIRMAN Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency Matjorie 1~. Student Assistant County Attorney 17B ASGM Business Center of Naples A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 40.88± Acres Located in Section 10 Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida PREPARED FOR: Martin S. Adler Richard L. Schwartz Herbert Garil Marvin I. Meyerson PREPARED BY: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 And R. Bruce Anderson, Esq. Young, vanAssenderp, Vamadoe & Anderson 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, F1 34108 EXHIBIT "A" F:~PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc DATE FILED DATE APPROVED BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC ORDINANCE NUMBER revision date 8/01/2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE SECTION I SECTION II SECTION III SECTION V EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, & GENERAL DESCRIPTION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS PARK GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS ASGM BUSINESS CENTER OF NAPLES PUD MASTER PLAN PAGE ii 1-1 2-1 3-1 4-1 F:LPUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 17B ii .4 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The purpose of this Section is to express the intent of Martin S. Adler, Richard L. Schwartz, Herbert Garil, and Marvin I. Meyerson, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, to create a Planned Unit Development (PUD) on 40.88± acres of land located in Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The name of this Planned Unit Development shall be ASGM Business Center of Naples. The development of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan, Business Park Subdistrict. The development will be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations adopted thereunder of the Growth Management Plan Future Land Use Element and other applicable regulations for the following reasons: The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The purpose of the Urban Mixed Use Residential District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict is to provide for a variety of residential and non-residential developments such as Planned Unit Developments. The ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD is compatible with and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the FLUE. The development of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policy 3.1. of the FLUE. o The ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD complies with the location and development criteria for business parks as found in the Business Park Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. o All final local development orders for this project are subject to the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code (LDC). SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "ASGM BUSINESS CENTER OF NAPLES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE". FSPUD DocumentsXASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 17B 1-1 SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the legal description and ownership of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD, and to describe the existing condition of the property proposed to be developed. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South ½ of the North ½ of the SW ¼ lying east of State Road 951 and the South ½ of the NW ¼ of the SE ¼ of Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Consisting of 40.88+acres. 1.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The project site is located in Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. The site is bordered on the north by the Prime Outlet Mall, zoned C-4 and undeveloped property zoned RMF-16 (8); on the south by Silver Lakes PUD; on the east by undeveloped Estates zoned property, and the west by Collier Boulevard (S.R. 951). The zoning classification of the subject property at the time of PUD application was A, Rural Agriculture. Elevations within the site are approximately 3.75' above MSL, per FEMA Finn Map Panel No. 120067 615 E, dated August 3, 1992, the ASGM Business Center of Naples property is located within flood zones AE (7). The site is largely vegetated and consists of disturbed Pine Flatwoods, Wax Myrtle, Brazilian Pepper and mixed wetland hardwoods. Eo The soil types on the site generally include Oldsmar Fine Sand, Oldsmar Fine Sand Limestone Substratum and Holopaw Fine Sand. Oldsmar Fine Sand represents a majority of the soil types found on the property. This information was derived from the Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida, 1998. The project site is located within the Collier County Water Management District Miscellaneous Coastal Basin. Go Industrial, light industrial and commercial uses shall be permitted within the Business Park designated portions of the project. FSPUD DocumentsLa. SGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 l?B SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2.1 2.2 2.3 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the plan of development for the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD, and to identify relationships to applicable County ordinances, policies, and procedures. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES mo The ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD will be developed as a business park providing for a mixture of light industrial and non-industrial uses and accessory uses, consistent with the Business Park Sub-district of the Urban Mixed Use District of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The Master Plan is illustrated graphically on Exhibit "A". A Land Use Summary indicating approximate land use acreages is shown on the plan. The master plan is conceptual, and the location, size, and configuration of individual tracts and access to tracts shall be determined at the time of final site development plan and/or preliminary subdivision plat approval with minor adjustments at the time of final plat approval in accordance with Sections 3.2.7 and 3.3 respectively of the LDC. COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES mo Regulations for development of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this PUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and the Collier County Growth Management Plan which are in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorize the construction of improvements, such as but not limited to final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit and preliminary work authorization. Where this PUD Ordinance does not provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the specific section of the LDC that is otherwise applicable shall apply. Where specific standards are specified in this PUD, these standards shall prevail over those in the LDC. Bo Unless otherwise defined herein, or as necessarily implied by context, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of development order application. Co Development permitted by the approval of this PUD will be subject to the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, Division 3.15 of the LDC. F:hoUD Documents~a, SGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 2.4 2-2 17 " Unless modified, waived or excepted by this PUD, the provisions of other sections of the Land Development Code remain in effect with respect to the development of the land that comprises this PUD. All conditions imposed herein or as represented on the ASGM Business Center of Naples Master Plan are part of the regulations which govern the manner in which the land may be developed. The Subdivisions Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.2) shall apply to the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD, except where an exemption or substitution is set forth herein or otherwise granted pursuant to the Land Development Code, Section 3.2.4. The Site Development Plans Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.3) shall apply to the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD, except where an exemption is set forth herein or otherwise granted pursuant to the Land Development Code, Section 3.3.4. ROADWAYS A. Roadways within the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD may be private. Standards for roads and driveways shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the LDC regulating subdivisions, unless otherwise modified, waived or excepted by this PUD or approved during preliminary subdivision plat approval. The Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to Code design standards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2 of the LDC. 2.5 2.6 EXCAVATION Removal of fill and rock from the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD shall be administratively permitted up to an amount of 10 percent per lake (20,000 cubic yards maximum), unless issued a commercial excavation permit. USE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY Utilization of lands within all project rights-of-way or access easements for landscaping, decorative entrance ways, and signage purposes shall be allowed subject to review and administrative approval by the Collier County Planning Services Director, taking into account engineering and safety considerations during the development review process and prior to any installations. F:\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 17B "'--' 2.7 2.8 CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Changes and amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance, PUD Master Plan as provided in Section 2.7.3.5 of the LDC. Minor changes and refinements as described herein may be made by the Developer in connection with any type of development or permit application required by the LDC. The Planning Services Director shall be authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the ASGM Business Center of Naples Master Plan. The PUD Master Plan is a conceptual plan containing approximate acreages of each land use. The actual acreages shall be determined at the time of preliminary subdivision plat or site development approval and shall be consistent with jurisdictional agency determinations. mo Reconfiguration of lakes, ponds, canals, preserve areas or other water management facilities where such changes are consistent with the criteria of the South Florida Water Management District or other applicable jurisdictional permitting agency and Collier County. Minor changes and refinements as described above shall be reviewed by appropriate Collier County staff to ensure that said changes and refinements are otherwise in compliance with all applicable County Ordinances and regulations prior to the Planning Services Director's consideration for approval. Co Approval by the Planning Services Director of a minor change or refinement may occur independently from and prior to any application for subdivision or site development plan approval; however, such approval shall not constitute an authorization for development or implementation of the minor change or refinement without first obtaining all other necessary County permits and approvals. COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Common area maintenance will be provided by a Property Owners' Association or similar entity. The Developer will create a property owners' association or associations, whose functions shall include provisions for the perpetual maintenance of common facilities and open spaces. F:\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 2.9 2.10 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD. The following standards shall apply: A. Landscape berrns shall have the following maximum side slopes: Ground covered berms 3:1 Rip-Rap berms 2:1 Landscape buffers shall be required as shown on the Conceptual Master Plan, Exhibit "A". The Type "B" buffer adjacent to the project's northern property boundary where abutting RMF-16(8) zoned property shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width and shall meet the vegetative height, opacity and landscape standards for Type "B" buffers per Section 2.4.7.4 of the LDC. Co Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls may be constructed along the perimeter of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD boundary prior to preliminary subdivision plat and site development plan submittal. Pedestrian sidewalks and/or bike paths, water management systems, drainage structures, and utilities may be allowed in landscape buffers, consistent with Section 2.4.7.3 of the Collier County LDC. Landscape berms located within the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD boundary and contiguous to a property line and/or right-of-way line may be constructed such that the toe of slope is located a minimum of five feet (5') from the property line and/or right-of-way line. DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS The Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of land under unified ownership or control, as set forth in the LDC, Section 2.2.20.2.3. Bo The ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD is a planned community and will be developed under unified control. The Developer will establish design guidelines and standards for business services, commercial uses, and related community features and facilities, which include features and facilities such as landscaping, signage, lighting, pedestrian systems, fences, buffers, and other similar facilities. FSPUD DocumentsLa. SGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 2.11 2.12 17B 2-5 Co All primary and secondary business park land uses shall be subject to Division 2.8 of the Collier County Land Development Code. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT PHASING Submission, review, and approval of preliminary subdivision plats for the project may be accomplished in phases to correspond with the planned development of the property. GENERAL PERMITTED USES Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD. General permitted uses are those uses which generally serve the Developer and residents of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD and are typically part of the common infrastructure or are considered community facilities. A. General Permitted Uses: 1. Essential services as set forth under LDC, Section 2.6.9.1. 2. Water management facilities and related structures. 3. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural bank treatments. 4. Community recreational facilities. 5. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including the necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses to serve such offices. 6. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.9 of this PUD. 7. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). B. Development Standards: Unless otherwise set forth in this Document, the following development standards shall apply to structures: 1. Setback from back of curb or edge of pavement of any road - Ten feet (10'). F:hoUD DocumentskASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 I?B 2.13 2.14 2. Setback from PUD boundary - Fifteen feet (15'). 3. Minimum distance between unrelated structures - Ten feet (10'). 4. Maximum height of structures - Forty-five feet (45'). 5. Minimum lot or parcel area - 15,000 square feet. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein shall be in accordance with LDC in effect at the time of site development plan approval. OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS The Collier County Land Development Code requires that mixed-use projects maintain open space at a minimum of 30% of the project area. The project will be designed in accordance with this standard and open space areas shall be shown on the site development plan and/or subdivision plat, whichever may be required. SIGNAGE A. GENERAL All Collier County sign regulations, pursuant to LDC, Division 2.5, Signs, in force at the time of sign permit application shall apply unless such regulations are in conflict with the conditions set forth in this Section, in which case the PUD Document shall govern. 2. Signs shall be permitted in private rights-of-way. 3. All signs shall be located so as not to cause sight line obstructions. All internal project rights-of-way, drive aisles, or access easements may be utilized for decorative landscaped entrance features and signage subject to review and approval from the Planning Services Department for consistency with the requirements set forth herein. F:\PUD DocumentshASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 ENTRANCE SIGNS Two ground or wall-mounted entrance signs maybe located at the entrance to the subdivision within the PUD. Such signs shall only contain the name of the subdivision or the insignia or motto of the development. The ground or wall signs shall not exceed a combined total of 64 square feet. The sign face area shall not exceed the height or length of the wall or monument upon which it is located. The setback for the signs from the public right-of-way and any perimeter property line shall be 15 feet. DIRECTORY SIGNS One directory sign shall be permitted at the project entry. The maximum sign area shall be 250 square feet and the sign shall not exceed 25 feet in height. The sign shall be set back a minimum of 15 feet from the Collier Boulevard right-of-way. Names of business located on out-parcels shall not appear on directory signs. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic signs such as street signs, stop signs and speed limit signs may be designed to reflect a common architectural theme. The placement and size of the signs shall be in accordance with DOT criteria. 2.15 SUBSTITUTIONS TO SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS A. The Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to subdivision improvement and utility design standards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2 of the LDC. Roadways within the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Section 3.2.8.4.16 of the LDC with the following substitutions: Section 3.2.8.4.16.5, Street Right-of-Way Width Street right-of-way width: The minimum right-of-way width to be utilized for public or private local streets and cul-de-sacs shall be forty (40') feet. F:\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 o 17B 2-8 Section 3.2.8.4.16.6, Dead-end Streets Cul-de-sacs may exceed a length of one thousand (1,000) feet. Section 3.2.8.4.16.8, Intersection Radii Intersection radii: Street intersections shall be provided with a minimum of a twenty (20) foot radius (face of curb) for all intemal project streets and a thirty-five (35) foot radius for intersections at project entrances. Section 3.2.8.4.16.10, Reverse Curves Reverse Curves: Tangents shall not be required between reverse curves on any project streets. Section 3.2.8.3.17.3, Sidewalks, bike lanes and bike paths The primary roadway network serving the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD shall be required to have a 5 foot wide sidewalk on each side of the roadway, extending from the entrance on Collier Boulevard to the eastern boundary of the northernmost Primary and Secondary Business Park tract. A 5 foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on one side of the remainder of the primary roadway network. Cul-de-sacs serving fewer than four building lots shall not be required to install sidewalks. The general location of the sidewalk system is shown on Exhibit A, Conceptual Master Plan. F:hoUD DocumentsLa, SGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 3.1 3.2 3.3 SECTION III BUSINESS PARK 3-1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for development areas within the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The approximate acreage of the business park is indicated on the Master Plan. This acreage is based on conceptual designs and is approximate. Actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of site development plan or preliminary subdivision plat approvals in accordance with Division 3.3, and Division 3.2 respectively, of the LDC. PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES A. Permitted primary uses. One-hundred percent of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD district acreage is allowed to be developed with the following uses: 2. 3. 4. Aircraft and parts (groups 3721 - 3728) Apparel and other finished products (groups 2311-2399) Building construction (groups 1521-1542) Business services (groups 7311, 7312, 7334, 7338, 7342- 7389) o Communications (groups 4812-4899, including communication towers limited in height to 100 feet and subject to Section 2.6.35.6.2.1. of the LDC.) 6. Construction: Special trade contractors (groups 1711-1799) Depository and non-depository institutions (groups 6011-6163 6019, 6081, 6082) 8. Drugs and medicines (groups 2833-2836) Eating places (group 5812 not including fast foods, walk-up windows and drive-through restaurants) 10. Educational services (groups 8243-8249 8221-8299, 8331) F:\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16 17 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing (groups 3612- 3699) Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711-8748) Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, 2099) Furniture and fixtures manufacturing (groups 2511 -2599) Government offices/buildings (groups 9111 - 9222, 9224-9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661) Health services (groups 8011-8049) Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3511-3599) Industrial inorganic chemicals (groups 2812-2819) Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (group 8331) Leather and leather products (groups 3131-3199) Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing (groups 3812-3873) Medical clinics (groups 8011, 8021, 8041-8049), provided that said use shall be permitted only as a related, accessory use, supportive and incidental to the primary, planned research office facilities and further provided that any such use shall be oriented internally to the major development of the planned research office facilities, with no direct access to major arterials external to the project. Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072, 8092, 8093) Membership organizations (group 8611, business associations; group 8631, labor unions and similar labor organizations) Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (groups 3911-3999) Motion picture production (groups 7812-7819) F:',PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 27. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (groups 4214 and 4225- indoor storage only) 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Paper and allied products (groups 2621-2679) Personal services (groups 7211-7219) Plastic materials and synthetics (groups 2821, 2834) Printing, publishing and allied industries (groups 2711-2796) Professional offices (groups 6311-6399, 6411, 6531, 6541, 6552, 6553, 6712-6799, 8111) 33. 34. 35. 36. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (groups 3021, 3052, 3053) Security/commodity brokers (group 6211) Social services (group 8331) Transportation equipment (groups 3714, 3716, 3731, 3732, 3751, 3792, 3799) 37. 38. U.S. Postal Service (group 4311) Wholesale trade (groups 5021-5031, 5043-5049, 5063-5078, 5091, 5092, 5094-5099, 5111-5159, 5182, 5191-5199) 39. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Permitted secondary uses: Thc following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD: 1. Amusement and recreation services (groups 7911, 7922, 7933, 7991) 2. Child day care services (group 8351) o Depository and non-depository institutions (groups 6021-6062. 6091, 6099, 6111-6163) Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with health services groups and medical laboratories/research/ rehabilitative groups. FAPUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 3.4 6. 7. 8. 9. Hotels (group 7011, up to 26 hotel units per acre density) Membership organizations (groups 8611, 8621, 8631) Museums and art galleries (group 8412) Personal services (groups 7221-7231, 7241, 7291) Professional offices: travel agencies (group 4724) C. Uses accessory to permitted primary and secondary uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right in the PUD. 2. Caretaker's residence, subject to Section 2.6.16 of the LDC. 3. For primary business park uses, retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal use shall not to exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. Development standards A. Minimum lot area: 20,000 square feet. B. Minimum lot width: 100 feet. C. Minimum yard requirements for principal and accessory structures: 3. 4. 5. Front yard: a. Collier Boulevard: Fifty feet (50') b. Internal roads: Twenty-five feet (25') Side yard: Ten feet (10') Rear yard: Ten feet (10') From PUD boundary: Twenty-five feet (25') Distance between structures: If there is a separation principal structures on the same parcel, minimum of 15 feet or a distance equal heights, whichever is the greater. between any two said separation shall be a to one-half the sum of their F:LPUD DocumentsXASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 17B ~I~3-~ Maximum height of structures: Forty feet (40'), except that architectural features and non-structural building elements may be constructed to a maximum height of fifty feet (50'). 7. Minimum floor area: One thousand square feet. F :\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 4-1 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the ASGM Business Center of Naples project. PUD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN mo All facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the final site development plans, final subdivision plans and all applicable State and Local laws, codes and regulations except where specifically noted. The PUD Master Plan (Exhibit A) is an illustration of the conceptual development plan. Tracts and boundaries shown on the plan are conceptual and shall not be considered final. Actual tract boundaries shall be determined at the time of preliminary subdivision plat or site development plan approval. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all utilities. ENGINEERING Ao Except as noted herein, all project development will occur consistent with Division 3.2 and 3.3 of the LDC. UTILITIES Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission systems shall be constructed throughout the project by the Developer. Central water and wastewater service will be provided by the appropriate governmental and/or private utility provider. Appropriate utility easements will be dedicated to the utility provider in accordance with the procedure adopted by the utility provider. B° Upon completion, the utility facilities shall be tested to insure that they meet Collier County's utility construction requirements in effect at the time construction plans are approved. Utilities shall be designed in accordance with the Collier County Utilities Ordinance No. 97-17. FSPUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 17B " 4-2 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 WATER MANAGEMENT Ao The project shall be designed in accordance with standards of the South Florida Water Management District. ENVIRONMENTAL mo An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance plan for the site shall be submitted to Current Planning Section Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. A schedule for exotic vegetation removal shall be submitted with the above-mentioned plan. A minimum of 15 percent (6.1 acres) of the site's viable naturally functioning native vegetation shall be retained or replanted in accordance with Section 3.9.5.5.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. However, this policy shall not be interpreted to allow development in wetlands, should wetlands alone constitute more than the portion of the site required to be preserved. For this site, a minimum of 7.93 acres including these wetland areas and native vegetation shall be retained on-site. TRANSPORTATION All project access points shall be coordinated with the State Department of Transportation. Bo Arterial level street lighting shall be provided by the developer at all project entrances at the time access improvements and infrastructure improvements are installed to support development of each individual tract. C. Signage and street markings shall be consistent with MUTCD standards. Potential interconnection locations to properties north of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD are conceptual in nature and the actual location shall be determined by mutual consent of property owners prior to site development plan or final plat approval. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT A copy of the South Florida Water Management District surface water management permit, permit modification or waiver shall be submitted to Collier County prior to site development plan approval. F:\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 Jl September 3, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance relating to Petition PUDZ-2001-AR-1331 Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Sunday, September 22, 2002 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: Account 113-138312-649110 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, October 8, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 1610N; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM UA" RURAL AGRICULTURE TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS "ASGM BUSINESS CENTER OF NAPLES" PUD LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ~ MILE SOUTH OF MANATEE ROAD ON COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR #951) IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 40.88+/ ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition No. PUDZ-2001-AR-1331, R. Bruce Anderson, of Young van Assenderp, Varnadoe & Anderson, representing Martin S. Adler, requesting a rezone from "A" Rural Agriculture to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD for a Business Park on Property located approximately ~ mile south of Manatee Road on Collier Boulevard, the property site is immediately south of the Prime Outlet Center in Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 40.88~ acres. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the 17B public hearing. Ail material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk ( SEAL ) September 3, 2002 R. Bruce Anderson Young vanAssenderp, Varnadoe & Anderson 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition PUDZ-2001-AR-1331 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, September 22, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Carleen A. Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 17B September 3, 2002 Martin S. Adler 4 Caramel Court Commack, NY 11725 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition PUDZ-2001-AR-1331 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, September 22, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Carleen A. Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Carleen A. Edwards To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com PUDZ-2001-AR-1331 17B Attached herein is advertising for September 22, 2002. Thank you and Have a Nice Day. PUDZ-2001-AR-133 PUDZ-2001-AR-133 1.doc 1.doc Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@clerk.collier.fi.us Tuesday, September 03, 2002 9:58 AM Carleen A. Edwards Delivery Status Notification (Relay) A]-F39000.Lxt PUDZ-2001-AR-133 1 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals@naplesnews.com Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com] Tuesday, September 03, 2002 9:56 AM Carleen A. Edwards Delivered: PUDZ-2001-AR-1331 17B PUDZ-2001-AR-133 1 <<PUDZ-2001-AR-1331>> Your message To: legals~naplesnews.com Subject: PUDZ-2001-AR-1331 Sent: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:57:37 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): legals on Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:56:08 -0400 NapLes DaiLy News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples DaiLy_N~ws _ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHERI LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 113-138312-64 58524429 PUDZ-2001-AR-1331 NO State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serve~ as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of a~vertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of I year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 09/22 AD SPACE: 158.000 INCH FILED ON: 09/23/02 Signature of Affiant Sworn to and Subscribed bef.,~o ~e-~'fi e thi~"~'~d~y of~ 20~)~~"* , Perso~lly known by me 178 iUDZ.2001.AR- 1331 I OTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER beF 8, 2002, Iff I' county GovernmenTI mi Tridl, Neples, F the Board of County ~der the enec~em ~La/ 91-102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DE- VELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHEN- SIVE ZONING REGU- LATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUM- BERED 1610N' BY CHANGING THE' ZON- ING CLAS,SIFICATION ERTY FROM A' RURAL AGRICUL- TURE TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DE- VEL,,O~ MENT KNOWN AS ASGM BUSINESS CENTER OF NAPLES" 'PUD LOCATED AP- PROXIMATELY V4 MILE SOUTH OF MANATEE ROAD ON COLLIER BOULE- VARD (CR #951) IN SECTION 10, TOWN- SHIP ,51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COL- LIER COUNTY, FLORI- DA,_ CONSISTING OF 40.8~+/ ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. PUDZ- Bruce Perso~ wishing to wrlffen er arabic m als Included In the I rial a Imum of 3 weeks pr the respective hearln~ In any case, ten maferlals Inten6 be considered by Board shell be subr aPPropriate C z minimum of b Any person who Board wlfl need e r reining thereto therefore/. .mov ne~ NOTE: All persons wish. ensure. ~ a vet ~ls mede, which reco . cludes the tesflmon~ r evlde~.~ t~m~ : ~ O~ COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA JAN~ N. COLETTA~ CHAIRMAN DWIGHT F.. BROCK. C CLERK b i By: ./s/_C..arleen Ed~ ORDINANCE NO. 02- 4 7 17B AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 1610N; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A" RURAL AGRICULTURE TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS "ASGM BUSINESS CENTER OF NAPLES" PUD LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE SOUTH OF MANATEE ROAD ON COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR #951) IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 40.88+/ ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, R. Bruce Anderson, of Young, vanAssenderp, Varnadoe and Anderson, representing Martin S. Alder, Richard L. Schwartz, Herbert Garil, and Marvin Meyerson, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "A" Rural Agriculture to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the "ASGM Business Center" PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 1610N, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this zgO~ay of(~~ ,2002 . ~"D~IG~ E. BROCK, Attest as to atr '$ s 1 gnat ure Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA JAML:~ COLETTP~., C-HAI~N Mmjorie 1~. Student Assistant County Attorney ASGM Business Center of Naples A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 40.88+ Acres Located in Section 10 Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida PREPARED FOR: Martin S. Adler Richard L. Schwartz Herbert Garil Marvin I. Meyerson PREPARED BY: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 And R. Bruce Anderson, Esq. Young, vanAssenderp, Vamadoe & Anderson 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, F1 34108 EXHIBIT "A" F:\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc DATE FILED DATE APPROVED BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC ~~ ORDINANCE NUMBER revision date 8/01/2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE SECTION I SECTION II SECTION III SECTION V EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, & GENERAL DESCRIPTION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS PARK GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS ASGM BUSINESS CENTER OF NAPLES PUD MASTER PLAN ii 1-1 2-1 3-1 4-1 F:\PUD Documents~SGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 ii STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The purpose of this Section is to express the intent of Martin S. Adler, Richard L. Schwartz, Herbert Garil, and Marvin I. Meyerson, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, to create a Planned Unit Development (PUD) on 40.88+ acres of land located in Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The name of this Planned Unit Development shall be ASGM Business Center of Naples. The development of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan, Business Park Subdistrict. The development will be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations adopted thereunder of the Growth Management Plan Future Land Use Element and other applicable regulations for the following reasons: The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The purpose of the Urban Mixed Use Residential District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict is to provide for a variety of residential and non-residential developments such as Planned Unit Developments. The ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD is compatible with and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the FLUE. The development of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policy 3.1. of the FLUE. The ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD complies with the location and development criteria for business parks as found in the Business Park Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. o All final local development orders for this project are subject to the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code (LDC). SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "ASGM BUSINESS CENTER OF NAPLES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE". F:\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 1-1 SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the legal description and ownership of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD, and to describe the existing condition of the property proposed to be developed. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South ½ of the North ½ of the SW ~A lying east of State Road 951 and the South ½ of the NW lA of the SE ¼ of Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Consisting of 40.88+acres. 1.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The project site is located in Section 10, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. The site is bordered on the north by the Prime Outlet Mall, zoned C-4 and undeveloped property zoned RMF-16 (8); on the south by Silver Lakes PUD; on the east by undeveloped Estates zoned property, and the west by Collier Boulevard (S.R. 951). The zoning classification of the subject property at the time of PUD application was A, Rural Agriculture. Elevations within the site are approximately 3.75' above MSL, per FEMA Firm Map Panel No. 120067 615 E, dated August 3, 1992, the ASGM Business Center of Naples property is located within flood zones AE (7). The site is largely vegetated and consists of disturbed Pine Flatwoods, Wax Myrtle, Brazilian Pepper and mixed wetland hardwoods. The soil types on the site generally include Oldsmar Fine Sand, Oldsmar Fine Sand Limestone Substratum and Holopaw Fine Sand. Oldsmar Fine Sand represents a majority of the soil types found on the property. This information was derived from the Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida, 1998. The project site is located within the Collier County Water Management District Miscellaneous Coastal Basin. Industrial, light industrial and commercial uses shall be permitted within the Business Park designated portions of the project. F:\PUD DocumentsLS. SGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 2.1 2.2 2.3 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the plan of development for the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD, and to identify relationships to applicable County ordinances, policies, and procedures. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES mo The ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD will be developed as a business park providing for a mixture of light industrial and non-industrial uses and accessory uses, consistent with the Business Park Sub-district of the Urban Mixed Use District of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Bo The Master Plan is illustrated graphically on Exhibit "A". A Land Use Summary indicating approximate land use acreages is shown on the plan. The master plan is conceptual, and the location, size, and configuration of individual tracts and access to tracts shall be determined at the time of final site development plan and/or preliminary subdivision plat approval with minor adjustments at the time of final plat approval in accordance with Sections 3.2.7 and 3.3 respectively of the LDC. COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES mo Regulations for development of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this PUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and the Collier County Growth Management Plan which are in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorize the construction of improvements, such as but not limited to final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit and preliminary work authorization. Where this PUD Ordinance does not provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the specific section of the LDC that is otherwise applicable shall apply. Where specific standards are specified in this PUD, these standards shall prevail over those in the LDC. Unless otherwise defined herein, or as necessarily implied by context, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of development order application. Co Development permitted by the approval of this PUD will be subject to the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, Division 3.15 of the LDC. FSPUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 2.4 Unless modified, waived or excepted by this PUD, the provisions of other sections of the Land Development Code remain in effect with respect to the development of the land that comprises this PUD. Eo All conditions imposed herein or as represented on the ASGM Business Center of Naples Master Plan are part of the regulations which govern the manner in which the land may be developed. The Subdivisions Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.2) shall apply to the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD, except where an exemption or substitution is set forth herein or otherwise granted pursuant to the Land Development Code, Section 3.2.4. The Site Development Plans Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.3) shall apply to the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD, except where an exemption is set forth herein or otherwise granted pursuant to the Land Development Code, Section 3.3.4. ROADWAYS A. Roadways within the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD may be private. Standards for roads and driveways shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the LDC regulating subdivisions, unless otherwise modified, waived or excepted by this PUD or approved during preliminary subdivision plat approval. The Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to Code design standards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2 of the LDC. 2.5 2.6 EXCAVATION Removal of fill and rock from the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD shall be administratively permitted up to an amount of 10 percent per lake (20,000 cubic yards maximum), unless issued a commercial excavation permit. USE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY Utilization of lands within all project rights-of-way or access easements for landscaping, decorative entrance ways, and signage purposes shall be allowed subject to review and administrative approval by the Collier County Planning Services Director, taking into account engineering and safety considerations during the development review process and prior to any installations. F:\PUD DocumentsXASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 2.7 2.8 2-3 CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Changes and amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance, PUD Master Plan as provided in Section 2.7.3.5 of the LDC. Minor changes and refinements as described herein may be made by the Developer in connection with any type of development or permit application required by the LDC. The Planning Services Director shall be authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the ASGM Business Center of Naples Master Plan. The PUD Master Plan is a conceptual plan containing approximate acreages of each land use. The actual acreages shall be determined at the time of preliminary subdivision plat or site development approval and shall be consistent with jurisdictional agency determinations. Reconfiguration of lakes, ponds, canals, preserve areas or other water management facilities where such changes are consistent with the criteria of the South Florida Water Management District or other applicable jurisdictional permitting agency and Collier County. Minor changes and refinements as described above shall be reviewed by appropriate Collier County staff to ensure that said changes and refinements are otherwise in compliance with all applicable County Ordinances and regulations prior to the Planning Services Director's consideration for approval. Approval by the Planning Services Director of a minor change or refinement may occur independently from and prior to any application for subdivision or site development plan approval; however, such approval shall not constitute an authorization for development or implementation of the minor change or refinement without first obtaining all other necessary County permits and approvals. COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Common area maintenance will be provided by a Property Owners' Association or similar entity. The Developer will create a property owners' association or associations, whose functions shall include provisions for the perpetual maintenance of common facilities and open spaces. F:\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 2.9 2.10 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD. The following standards shall apply: A. Landscape berms shall have the following maximum side slopes: Ground covered berms 3:1 Rip-Rap berms 2:1 Landscape buffers shall be required as shown on the Conceptual Master Plan, Exhibit "A". The Type "B" buffer adjacent to the project's northern property boundary where abutting RMF-16(8) zoned property shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width and shall meet the vegetative height, opacity and landscape standards for Type "B" buffers per Section 2.4.7.4 of the LDC. Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls may be constructed along the perimeter of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD boundary prior to preliminary subdivision plat and site development plan submittal. Pedestrian sidewalks and/or bike paths, water management systems, drainage structures, and utilities may be allowed in landscape buffers, consistent with Section 2.4.7.3 of the Collier County LDC. mo Landscape berms located within the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD boundary and contiguous to a property line and/or right-of-way line may be constructed such that the toe of slope is located a minimum of five feet (5') from the property line and/or right-of-way line. DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS The Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of land under unified ownership or control, as set forth in the LDC, Section 2.2.20.2.3. The ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD is a planned community and will be developed under unified control. The Developer will establish design guidelines and standards for business services, commercial uses, and related community features and facilities, which include features and facilities such as landscaping, signage, lighting, pedestrian systems, fences, buffers, and other similar facilities. F:LPUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 Co All primary and secondary business park land uses shall be subject to Division 2.8 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 2.11 2.12 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT PHASING Submission, review, and approval of preliminary subdivision plats for the project may be accomplished in phases to correspond with the planned development of the property. GENERAL PERMITTED USES Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD. General permitted uses are those uses which generally serve the Developer and residents of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD and are typically part of the common infrastructure or are considered community facilities. A. General Permitted Uses: 1. Essential services as set forth under LDC, Section 2.6.9.1. 2. Water management facilities and related structures. o Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural bank treatments. 4. Community recreational facilities. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including the necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses to serve such offices. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.9 of this PUD. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (~ZA). B. Development Standards: Unless otherwise set forth in this Document, the following development standards shall apply to structures: 1. Setback from back of curb or edge of pavement of any road - Ten feet (10'). F:\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 2.13 2.14 2-6 2. Setback from PUD boundary - Fifteen feet (15'). 3. Minimum distance between unrelated structures - Ten feet (10'). 4. Maximum height of structures - Forty-five feet (45'). 5. Minimum lot or parcel area - 15,000 square feet. 6. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein shall be in accordance with LDC in effect at the time of site development plan approval. OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS The Collier County Land Development Code requires that mixed-use projects maintain open space at a minimum of 30% of the project area. The project will be designed in accordance with this standard and open space areas shall be shown on the site development plan and/or subdivision plat, whichever may be required. SIGNAGE A. GENERAL All Collier County sign regulations, pursuant to LDC, Division 2.5, Signs, in force at the time of sign permit application shall apply unless such regulations are in conflict with the conditions set forth in this Section, in which case the PUD Document shall govern. Signs shall be permitted in private rights-of-way. All signs shall be located so as not to cause sight line obstructions. All internal project rights-of-way, drive aisles, or access easements may be utilized for decorative landscaped entrance features and signage subject to review and approval from the Planning Services Department for consistency with the requirements set forth herein. F:\PUD Documents~SGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 Bo 2-7 ENTRANCE SIGNS Two ground or wall-mounted entrance signs maybe located at the entrance to the subdivision within the PUD. Such signs shall only contain the name of the subdivision or the insignia or motto of the development. The ground or wall signs shall not exceed a combined total of 64 square feet. The sign face area shall not exceed the height or length of the wall or monument upon which it is located. The setback for the signs from the public right-of-way and any perimeter property line shall be 15 feet. DIRECTORY SIGNS o One directory sign shall be permitted at the project entry. The maximum sign area shall be 250 square feet and the sign shall not exceed 25 feet in height. The sign shall be set back a minimum of 15 feet from the Collier Boulevard right-of-way. Names of business located on out-parcels shall not appear on directory signs. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic signs such as street signs, stop signs and speed limit signs may be designed to reflect a common architectural theme. The placement and size of the signs shall be in accordance with DOT criteria. 2.15 SUBSTITUTIONS TO SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS The Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to subdivision improvement and utility design standards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2 of the LDC. Bo Roadways within the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Section 3.2.8.4.16 of the LDC with the following substitutions: 1. Section 3.2.8.4.16.5, Street Right-of-Way Width Street right-of-way width: The minimum right-of-way width to be utilized for public or private local streets and cul-de-sacs shall be forty (40') feet. F:\PUD DocumentsLASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 Section 3.2.8.4.16.6, Dead-end Streets 2-8 Cul-de-sacs may exceed a length of one thousand (1,000) feet. Section 3.2.8.4.16.8, Intersection Radii Intersection radii: Street intersections shall be provided with a minimum of a twenty (20) foot radius (face of curb) for all internal project streets and a thirty-five (35) foot radius for intersections at project entrances. 4. Section 3.2.8.4.16.10, Reverse Curves Reverse Curves: Tangents shall not be required between reverse curves on any project streets. 5. Section 3.2.8.3.17.3, Sidewalks, bike lanes and bike paths The primary roadway network serving the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD shall be required to have a 5 foot wide sidewalk on each side of the roadway, extending from the entrance on Collier Boulevard to the eastern boundary of the northernmost Primary and Secondary Business Park tract. A 5 foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on one side of the remainder of the primary roadway network. Cul-de-sacs serving fewer than four building lots shall not be required to install sidewalks. The general location of the sidewalk system is shown on Exhibit A, Conceptual Master Plan. FSPUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 3.1 3.2 3.3 3-1 SECTION III BUSINESS PARK PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for development areas within the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The approximate acreage of the business park is indicated on the Master Plan. This acreage is based on conceptual designs and is approximate. Actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of site development plan or preliminary subdivision plat approvals in accordance with Division 3.3, and Division 3.2 respectively, of the LDC. PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES A. Permitted primary uses. One-hundred percent of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD district acreage is allowed to be developed with the following uses: 2. 3. 4. Aircraft and parts (groups 3721-3728) Apparel and other finished products (groups 2311-2399) Building construction (groups 1521-1542) Business services (groups 7311, 7312, 7334, 7338, 7342- 7389) o Communications (groups 4812-4899, including communication towers limited in height to 100 feet and subject to Section 2.6.35.6.2.1. of the LDC.) 6. Construction: Special trade contractors (groups 1711-1799) Depository and non-depository institutions (groups 6011-6163 6019, 6081, 6082) 8. Drugs and medicines (groups 2833-2836) Eating places (group 5812 not including fast foods, walk-up windows and drive-through restaurants) 10. Educational services (groups 8243-8249 8221-8299, 8331) F :\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16 17 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing (groups 3612- 3699) Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711-8748) Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, 2099) Furniture and fixtures manufacturing (groups 2511 -2599) Government offices/buildings (groups 9111 - 9222, 9224-9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661) Health services (groups 8011-8049) Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3511-3599) Industrial inorganic chemicals (groups 2812-2819) Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (group 8331) Leather and leather products (groups 3131-3199) Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing (groups 3812-3873) Medical clinics (groups 8011,802 I, 8041-8049), provided that said use shall be permitted only as a related, accessory use, supportive and incidental to the primary, planned research office facilities and further provided that any such use shall be oriented internally to the major development of the planned research office facilities, with no direct access to major arterials external to the project. Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072, 8092, 8093) Membership organizations (group 8611, business associations; group 8631, labor unions and similar labor organizations) Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (groups 3911-3999) Motion picture production (groups 7812-7819) F:\PUD DocumentskASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 27. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (groups 4214 and 4225- indoor storage only) 28. Paper and allied products (groups 2621-2679) 29. Personal services (groups 7211-7219) 30. Plastic materials and synthetics (groups 2821, 2834) 31. Printing, publishing and allied industries (groups 2711-2796) 32. Professional offices (groups 6311-6399, 6411,6531, 6541, 6552, 6553, 6712-6799, 8111) 33. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (groups 3021, 3052, 3053) 34. Security/commodity brokers (group 6211) 35. Social services (group 8331) 36. Transportation equipment (groups 3714, 3716, 3731, 3732, 3751, 3792, 3799) 37. U.S. Postal Service (group 4311) 38. Wholesale trade (groups 5021-5031, 5043-5049, 5063-5078, 5091, 5092, 5094-5099, 5111-5159, 5182, 5191-5199) 39. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Permitted secondary uses: The following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD: 1. Amusement and recreation services (groups 7911, 7922, 7933, 7991) 2. Child day care services (group 8351) 3. Depository and non-depository institutions (groups 6021-6062. 6091, 6099, 6111-6163) 4. Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with health services groups and medical laboratories/research/ rehabilitative groups. F:h°UD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 3.4 o 6. 7. 8. 9. Hotels (group 7011, up to 26 hotel units per acre density) Membership organizations (groups 8611,8621,8631) Museums and art galleries (group 8412) Personal services (groups 7221-7231, 7241, 7291) Professional offices: travel agencies (group 4724) Uses accessory to permitted primary and secondary uses: 1. Development A. B. C. 3-4 Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right in the PUD. Caretaker' s residence, subject to Section 2.6.16 of the LDC. For primary business park uses, retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal use shall not to exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. standards Minimum lot area: 20,000 square feet. Minimum lot width: 100 feet. Minimum yard requirements for principal and accessory structures: 3. 4. 5. Front yard: a. Collier Boulevard: Fifty feet (50') b. Intemal roads: Twenty-five feet (25') Side yard: Ten feet (10') Rear yard: Ten feet (10') From PUD boundary: Twenty-five feet (25') Distance between structures: If there is a separation between any two principal structures on the same parcel, said separation shall be a minimum of 15 feet or a distance equal to one-half the sum of their heights, whichever is the greater. F:~UD DocumentsXASGM2?UD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 3-5 Maximt~m height of structures: Forty feet (40'), except that architectural features and non-structural building elements may be constructed to a maximum height of fifty feet (50'). 7. Minimum floor area: One thousand square feet. F:\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 4-1 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the ASGM Business Center of Naples project. PUD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN All facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the final site development plans, final subdivision plans and all applicable State and Local laws, codes and regulations except where specifically noted. Bo The PUD Master Plan (Exhibit A) is an illustration of the conceptual development plan. Tracts and boundaries shown on the plan are conceptual and shall not be considered final. Actual tract boundaries shall be determined at the time of preliminary subdivision plat or site development plan approval. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all utilities. ENGINEERING mo Except as noted herein, all project development will occur consistent with Division 3.2 and 3.3 of the LDC. UTILITIES A° Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission systems shall be constructed throughout the project by the Developer. Central water and wastewater service will be provided by the appropriate governmental and/or private utility provider. Appropriate utility easements will be dedicated to the utility provider in accordance with the procedure adopted by the utility provider. Upon completion, the utility facilities shall be tested to insure that they meet Collier County's utility construction requirements in effect at the time construction plans are approved. Utilities shall be designed in accordance with the Collier County Utilities Ordinance No. 97-17. FSPUD Documents~.SGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 4-2 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 WATER MANAGEMENT The project shall be designed in accordance with standards of the South Florida Water Management District. ENVIRONMENTAL mo An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance plan for the site shall be submitted to Current Planning Section Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. A schedule for exotic vegetation removal shall be submitted with the above-mentioned plan. Bo A minimum of 15 percent (6.1 acres) of the site's viable naturally functioning native vegetation shall be retained or replanted in accordance with Section 3.9.5.5.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. However, this policy shall not be interpreted to allow development in wetlands, should wetlands alone constitute more than the portion of the site required to be preserved. For this site, a minimum of 7.93 acres including these wetland areas and native vegetation shall be retained on-site. TRANSPORTATION All project access points shall be coordinated with the State Department of Transportation. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided by the developer at all project entrances at the time access improvements and infrastructure improvements are installed to support development of each individual tract. C. Signage and street markings shall be consistent with MUTCD standards. Do Potential interconnection locations to properties north of the ASGM Business Center of Naples PUD are conceptual in nature and the actual location shall be determined by mutual consent of property owners prior to site development plan or final plat approval. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT A copy of the South Florida Water Management District surface water management permit, permit modification or waiver shall be submitted to Collier County prior to site development plan approval. F:\PUD Documents~ASGM2PUD.doc revision date 8/01/2002 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2002-47 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 8th day of October, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this llth day of October, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK .-.,:<:;'~"" ,~-,. Clerk of Courts and .cIe~k(~,',~ Ex-officio to Board o~ County Commissioners ...... By: Ellie Hof fman, Dopugy Clerk COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: C XXX Normal legal Advertisement [] Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) petifion No. (If none, give brief descriptio : Scrf~ s Error OrdinanCe for Winding Cypress Petitioner: (Name&Address): Ray Be,~ows- Collier County Planning Services Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before XXX BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: 10/8/0 2 Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News Other Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. [] Legally Required See attached Ordinance Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? [] Yes [] No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: Approved by: County Manager Date 113-138312-6491 A~ed by: List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTION .S. For bearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. Date Received: 7//,~/0~ Date of Public he.g: Date A&e~ed: ORDINANCE NO. 02- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 02- 35, TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERRORS TO WINDING CYPRESS PUD, SUBSECTION 3.5, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLES I AND II SETTING FORTH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR "R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS - TRACTS A AND B; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 02-35, an Ordinance amending the Winding Cypress PUD on June 25, 2002, and WHEREAS, following said action adopting Ordinance No. 02-35, Planning Staff was advised that certain typographical errors were made in Tables I and II of the Ordinance providing for development standards for residential areas in Tract A and Tract B respectively and their correction constitutes a scrivener's error. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida that: SECTION ONE: SCRIVENER'S ERROR AMENDMENT TO CORRECT ERRORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLES FOR "R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS TRACTS A AND B CONTAINED IN SUBSECTION 3.5 OF ORDINANCE NO. 02-35, THE WINDING CYPRESS PUD Subsection 3.5, Development Standards, of Ordinance No. 02-35, the Winding Cypress PUD, specifically Tables I and II setting forth development standards for Tracts A and B, is hereby amended to read as follows: TABLE I WINDING CYPRESS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR "R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS - TRACT A SINGLE PATIOTM & TWO SINGLE FAMILY MULTI- FAMILY ZERO LOT FAMILY & ATTACHED & FAMILY DETACHED LINE DUPLEX TOWN HOUSE Minimum Site Area 2,800 SF 2,800 SF 3,500 SF 2,200 SF 12,000 SF Minimum 35' 35' 35' 20' 100' Site Width Minimum 65' 65' 100' 40' 90' Site Depth Front Yard Setback 15' *~ 15'*~ 15' *~ 15'.4 15,.4 (Principal and Accessory) Rear Yard Setback 10' 10' 10' 10' 20' (Principal) Side Yard Setback 5' .5 5' 5' 7.5' (Principal) - .2 Side Yard Setback 5' '5 5' 5' .6 5' (Accessory) - .2 Rear Yard Setback 5' 5' 5' (Accessory) 5' 7 10' Maximum Height *3 35' 35' 35' 50' 50' Distance Between N/A N/A N/A 10' 15' Principal Structures Words stn:ck Xhmugh are deleted; words underlined are added. I Minimum Floor Area I 900 SF I 900 SF I 900 SF I General Notes: 750 SF I 750 SF I For any lot or parcel, which is served by both a sUeet and an alley, the lot line adjacent to the alley shall be treated as a rear lot line, and the setback shall be measured from the edge of pavement. The alley easement shall be a minimum of 20' wide, with 10' pavement. Common architectural features such amhways, arbors, and courtyard entry features shall be exempt from the minimum yard requirements listed above. Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type, and not the minimum lot area, shall define the development standards to be applied by the Customer Services Department during an application for a building permit. For all patio or zero lot line units, a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configuration shall be submitted to Customer Services Department with the application for the first building permit. The conceptual exhibit may be modified as needed. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. With approval from the Developer, front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. Sidewalks shall be located in the right- of-way. B. ffthe parcel is served by a private mad, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). * 1 This setback shall be reduced to 10' for side entry garages, front porches, and combination front poreh/front entry garages. *2 The side comer setback shall be the same as the required front principal structure setback. *3 Height shall be measured from the first habitable finished floor elevation of the unit. *4 Setback to be measured from edge of pavement or back of curb, whichever is applicable, of road that serves the unit. *5 Side yard setback shall be either 0' on one side and 10' on the other, or 3'-1" on one side and 6'-11" on the other. *6 Accessory Pool Enclosure/screen lanai setback may be reduced to 0' when attached to privacy wall. *7 Accessory Pool Enclosure/screen lanai setback from Lake Maintenance Easement may be reduced to 0' provided architectural bank Ireatment is incorporated *8 A Patio Home is a detached or semi-detached unit for a single family with one (1) dwelling unit from ground to roof wherein each dwelling unit lot is enclosed by a wall located at the lot line, thus creating a private yard between the house and the wall TABLE H WINDING CYPRESS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR "R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS - TRACT B SINGLE PATIO*s & TWO SINGLE MULTI FAMILY FAMILY ZERO LOT FAMILY & FAMILY DWELLINGS.6 DETACHED LINE DUPLEX ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE Minimum Lot Area 7,500 SF 5,000 SF 3,500 SF .3 3,000 SF NA Minimum Lot Width *s 75 50 35 30 NA Minimum Front Yard Setback (Principal and 20 20 20 20 20 Accessory) Minimum Front Yard for Side 12 12 12 12 12 Entry Garage Minimum Rear Yard Setback (Principal) 10 5 10 10 .5 BH Minimum Rear Yard SetbackTM (Accessory) 5 5 5 5 10 Minimum Side Yard 7.5 0 or 5*5 0 or 7.5 0 or .5 BH .5 SBH Setback Maximum Height *2 40 35 35 35 65 Floor Area Minimum (SF) 1500 SF 1200 SF 1200 SF 1200 SF 1000 SF'7 Distance Between Principal Structures 15 10 0 or 15 .5 SBH .5 SBH BH: Building Height SBH: (Sum ofBuilding Heights): Combined heightoftwoadjacentbuildings for thepurposeofdeterminingsethackrequirements. Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type, and not the minimum lot area, shall define the development standards to be applied by the Customer Services Department during an application for a building permit. For all patio or zero lot line units, a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configurations shall be submitted to the Customer Services Department with the application for the first building permit. The conceptual exhibit may be modified as needed. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. Any structure more than two stories in height will maintain a 20 foot minimum building separation. Guest houses shall meet thc applicable principal structure setbacks and shall be permitted on lots 15,000 square feet or greater. Flag lots shall have no minimum lot width but will meet lot area requirements With approval from the Developer, front yards shall be measured as follows: Words stvack ~reugh are deleted; words underlined are added. -2- 17[; A. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. Sidewalks shall be located in the right-of- way. B. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). *1 - Setback from lake for all accessory uses may be 0 feet providing architectural bank treatment (such as bulkhead or retaining wall) is incoqx~ated into design and subject to written approval from the Developer Design Review Committee and Project Plan Review. *2 - Building height shall be the vertical distance measured from the first habitable finished floor elevation to the uppermost finished ceiling elevation of the structure. *3 - Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 S.F. for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 S.F. *4- Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul-de-sac lots provided minimum lot area requirement is still maintained. *5 For patio homes with less than a 5' side yard setback, the opposite side setback shall be sufficient so that the combined setbacks equal 10'. Once the first building on the side of a street utilizing this product type is permitted, all subsequent buildings must follow the pattern established by the first unit. For example, a 3' setback on one lot must be followed by a 7' setback on the next lot or vice versa. *6 - Multi-family shall include multi-family units as defined in Collier County LDC and assisted living facilities/congregate care facilities. *7 - Floor area minimum (SF) is not applicable to assisted living facilities/congregate care facilities. *8- A Patio Home is a detached or semi-detached unit for a single family with one (1) dwelling unit from ground to roof wherein each dwelling unit lot is enclosed by a wall located at the lot line, thus creating a private yard between the house and the wall. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ,2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency BY: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Marj ori~ ~; Student ' Assistant County Attorney Scrivener's Error/f/RVB/rb Words strut,tr, ahreugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 178 September 13, 2002 Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider a Scrivener,s Error Ordinance for Winding Cypress PUD Dear Georgia: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Sunday, September 22, 2002 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Purchase Order No. 113-138312-649110 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, October 8, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 02-35, TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERRORS TO WINDING CYPRESS PUD, SUBSECTION 3.5, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLES I AND II SETTING FORTH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR UR" RESIDENTIAL AREAS - TP~ACTS A AND B; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. Ail material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Carleen Edwards, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Carleen A. Edwards To: Subject: legals@naplesnews.com Scrivener's Error Ordinance/Winding Cypress t7C 9/13/02 Good Afternoon, Attached herein is advertising for 9/22/02. Thank you. Scriveners Error Scriveners Error Winding O/pre... Winding O/pre... Carleen A. Edwards From: Sent: To: Subject: postmaster@clerk.collier.fi.us Friday, September 13, 2002 3:12 PM Carleen A. Edwards Delivery Status Notification (Relay) A'l-r196527.txt Scrivener's Error Ordinance/Wi... This is an automatically 9enerated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the followin9 recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. legals~naplesnews.com 17C Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily NeY, s BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHERZ LEFARA PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 1131383126491 58523298 NOTICE OF ZNTENT TO State of FLorida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples 0oily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples/ in Collier County, FLorida: that the attached . copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples 0oily News is a newspaper published at Naples/ in said Collier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, FLorida, each day and has been entered as second class mail ·atter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, FLorida/ for a period of I year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount/ rebater commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pubLiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 09/22 AD SPACE: 109.000 INCH FILED ON: 09/23/02 Sworn to and Subscribed befo~e/t~ th ay Personally known by me .... ~ ..... ~f ~ ,1005 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, Octo- ber 8, 2002, In fie Boord- room, 3rcl Floor, Admln- I_st~atinn Building, Collie[. County Governmen~ Center, 3301 East Totals- mi Troll, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will con. sider the enactment of o County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance Is es follow~ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDI- NANCE NUMBER 02-35, TO CORRECT SCR/VENER'S ER- RORS TO WINDING CYPRESS PUD, SUB- SECTION 3.5, DEVEL- OPMENT STAN-i DARDS, TABLES AND II SETTINGI FORTH DEVELOP-I MENT STANDARDS] FOR 'R' RESIDENTIAL I AREA~ , TRACTS Al AND B; AND BY PRO- VIDING FOR AN EF-I FECTIVE DATE. I Copies of the proposed Ord nonce are on fle wl~ the Clerk tofie Board and ore available for InsPec. flon. All Interested m~rtles are Invited to attend and NOTE: Ail ~ersens wish- Jng to se e ak on any agen- da Item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of minutes on any Item. The selection of an Indlviduol organization or group 15 encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a ar orgonlzcdton may be al. lotted 10 mlnules to speak on an Item. Persons wishing to have wrlffen or graphic materi- als Included In the Board Iai o min- Imum of 3 weeks prior to fha respective public ~e con,ldored by the staff a minimum of seven ~ mm'~rldi ~ in pre~-w~nVm-ns before fie Boord WIll become o AnY ~ ~ dncl~ to ope3eal o declrdon of fie Board will need a record ~o~mng thereto and ensure WlOt a vef~x~Im record of the procoodiqgs Is made, whlc~ record In- dudes the testimony ond evl~d~ll~ which the ~fll~D OF COUNTY CO~ISSIONE. R$ COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA J.~.S N. COL.ETT A. CHAIRNLAN~ DWIGHT i= BROCK. CLERK By: Corleen Edwards ~u~Cl~k No. 17C ORDINANCE NO. 02- 4 8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 02- 35, TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERRORS TO WINDING CYPRESS PUD, SUBSECTION 3.5, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLES I AND II SETTING FORTH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR "R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS - TRACTS A AND B; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 02-35, an Ordinance amending the Winding Cypress PUD on June 25, 2002, and WHEREAS, following said action adopting Ordinance No. 02-35, Planning Staff was advised that certain typographical errors were made in Tables I and II of the Ordinance providing for development standards for residential areas in Tract A and Tract B respectively and their correction constitutes a scrivener's error. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida that: SECTION ONE: SCRIVENER'S ERROR AMENDMENT TO CORRECT ERRORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLES FOR "R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS TRACTS A AND B CONTAINED IN SUBSECTION 3.5 OF ORDINANCE NO. 02-35, THE WINDING CYPRESS PUD Subsection 3.5, Development Standards, of Ordinance No. 02-35, the Winding Cypress PUD, specifically Tables I and II setting forth development standards for Tracts A and B, is hereby amended to read as follows: TABLE I WINDING CYPRESS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR "R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS - TRACT A SINGLE PATIO.8 & TWO SINGLE FAMILY MULTI- FAMILY ZERO LOT FAMILY & ATTACHED & FAMILY DETACHED LINE DUPLEX TOWN HOUSE Minimum Site Area 2,800 SF 2,800 SF 3,500 SF 2,200 SF 12,000 SF Minimum 35' 35' 35' 20' 100' Site Width Minimum 65' 65' 100' 40' 90' Site Depth Front Yard Setback 15' *~ 15'* ~ 15' *~ 15"4 15' *4 (Principal and Accessory) Rear Yard Setback 10' 10' 10' 10' 20' (Principal) Side Yard Setback 5' *s 5' 5' 7.5' (Principal) - *2 Side Yard Setback 5' *s 5' 5' .6 5' (Accessory) - .2 Rear Yard Setback 5' 5' 5' 5' 7 10' (Accessory) Maximum Height *3 35' 35' 35' 50' 50' Distance Between N/A N/A N/A 10' 15' Principal Structures Words struck ~hrough are deleted; words underlined are added. Minimum Floor Area I 900 SF I 900 SF I 900 SF I General Notes: 750 SF 750 SF For any lot or parcel, which is served by both a street and an alley, the lot line adjacent to the alley shall be treated as a rear lot line, and the setback shall be measured from the edge of pavement. The alley easement shall be a minimum of 20' wide, with 10' pavement. Common architectural features such archways, arbors, and courtyard enlxy features shall be exempt from the minimum yard requirements listed above. Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type, and not the minimum lot area, shall define the development standards to be applied by the Customer Services Department during an application for a building permit. For all patio or zero lot line units, a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configuration shall be submitted to Customer Services Department with the application for the first building permit. The conceptual exhibit may be modified as needed. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. With approval from the Developer, front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. Sidewalks shall be located in the right- of-way. B. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). * l This setback shall be reduced to 10' for side em'wy garages, front porches, and combination front porch/front entry garages. *2 The side comer setback shall be the same as the required front principal structure setback. *3 Height shall be measured from the first habitable finished floor elevation of the unit. *4 Setback to be measured from edge of pavement or back of curb, whichever is applicable, of road that serves the unit. *5 Side yard setback shall be either 0' on one side and 10' on the other, or 3'-1" on one side and 6'-11" on the other. *6 Accessory Pool Enclosure/screen lanai setback may be reduced to 0' when attached to privacy wall. *7 Accessory Pool Enclosure/screen lanai setback from Lake Maintenance Easement may be reduced to 0' provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated *8 A Patio Home is a detached or semi-detached unit for a single family with one (1) dwelling unit from ground to roof wherein each dwelling unit lot is enclosed by a wall located at the lot line, thus creating a private yard between the house and the wall TABLE H WINDING CYPRESS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR "R" RESIDENTIAL AREAS - TRACT B SINGLE PATIO.8 & TWO SINGLE MULTI FAMILY FAMILY ZERO LOT FAMILY & FAMILY DWELLINGSTM DETACHED LINE DUPLEX ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE Minimum Lot Area 7,500 SF 5,000 SF 3,500 SF .3 3,000 SF NA Minimum Lot Width .5 75 50 35 30 NA Minimum Front Yard Setback (Principal and 20 20 20 20 20 Accessory) Minimum Front Yard for Side 12 12 12 12 12 Entry Garage Minimum Rear Yard Setback (Principal) 10 5 10 10 .5 BH Minimum Rear Yard SetbackTM (Accessory) 5 5 5 5 10 Minimum Side Yard 7.5 0 or 5*5 0 or 7.5 0 or .5 BH .5 SBH Setback Maximum Height *2 40 35 35 35 65 Floor Area Minimum (SF) 1500 SF 1200 SF 1200 SF 1200 SF 1000 SF.7 Distance Between Principal Structures 15 10 0 or 15 .5 SBH .5 SBH BH: Building Height SBH: (Sum of Building Heights): Combined height of two adjacent buildings for the purpose of determining setback requirements. Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type, and not the minimum lot area, shall define the development standards to be applied by the Customer Services Department during an application for a building permit. For all patio or zero lot line units, a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configurations shall be submitted to the Customer Services Department with the application for the first building permit. The conceptual exhibit may be modified as needed. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. Any structure more than two stories in height will maintain a 20 foot minimum building separation. Guest houses shall meet the applicable principal structure setbacks and shall be permitted on lots 15,000 square feet or greater. Flag lots shall have no minimum lot width but will meet lot area requirements With approval from the Developer, front yards shall be measured as follows: Words o,~,~t. ,~. ..... h ............ ~,~. are deleted; words underlined are added. -2- 170 A. If the parcel is served by a public fight-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. Sidewalks shall be located in the right-of- way. B. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). *1 - Setback from lake for all accessory uses may be 0 feet providing architectural bank treatment (such as bulkhead or retaining wall) is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from the Developer Design Review Committee and Project Plan Review. *2 - Building height shall be the vertical distance measured from the first habitable finished floor elevation to the uppermost finished ceiling elevation of the structure. *3 - Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 S.F. for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 S.F. *4- Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul-de-sac lots provided minimum lot area requirement is still maintained. *5 For patio homes with less than a 5' side yard setback, the opposite side setback shall be sufficient so that the combined setbacks equal 10'. Once the first building on the side of a street utilizing this product type is permitted, all subsequent buildings must follow the pattern established by the first unit. For example, a 3' setback on one lot must be followed by a 7' setback on the next lot or vice versa. *6 - Multi-family shall include multi-family units as defined in Collier Counly LDC and assisted living facilities/congregate care facilities. *7 - Floor area minimum (SF) is not applicable to assisted living facilities/congregate care facilities. *8- A Patio Home is a detached or semi-detached unit for a single family with one (1) dwelling unit from ground to roof wherein each dwelling unit lot is enclosed by a wall located at the lot line, thus creating a private yard between the house and the wall. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this Olr;l~ day of (~~ ,2002. ATTEST! BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS tes[ as 'to Chaln lt' ' JAh N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN ^pproveo as ro ~ orrn and Legal Sufficiency Marjorie 1~I.' Student - ~ Assistant County Attorney Scrivener's Error/f/RVB/rb Words o,-,~b .~ ..... h ............ ~,.. are deleted; words underlined are added. -3- STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2002-48 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 8th day of October, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 9th day of October, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk, Ex-officio to Board of ~.~ County Commissioners ?, By: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk