The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 09/13/2016 R Item # 9C 9.0 09/13/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2014-34, the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 12.17± acres of land zoned Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD; by adding 48 residential dwelling units for a total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding 150 group housing units for a total of 500 group housing units; by amending the master plan; by repealing Ordinance No. 11- 18, the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD; and by providing an effective date. The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Learning Lane and Livingston Road, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 40.55± acres. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staffs findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this PUD rezone petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The petitioner, who owns the subject property, is requesting to rezone 12.17+ acres (from CFPUD) and incorporate the land area into the existing RPUD, in order to allow for an additional forty-eight(48)residential dwelling units. The developer would also have an alternative option to develop the site with group housing [i.e., up to one hundred and fifty (150) additional units] instead of residential dwellings. This petition also seeks to amend an existing deviation related to the allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR). FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element(CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT (GMP) IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Comprehensive Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the FLUE: however staff recommends a possible interconnection to the north be identified on the PUD master plan and in Exhibit F - Developer Commitments of the PUD Document. Packet Pg. 190 9.0 09/13/2016 Transportation Element: Based on the 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR), the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the project within the five (5) year planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Transportation Planning staff is also recommending that a future interconnection be shown on the master plan to the undeveloped parcel to the north. The agent notes in the application that his property is currently owned by the Diocese of Venice; which may or may not eventually develop this parcel in the future. These types of interconnections can provide access between developments reducing access to Livingston Road. For this reason, staff is recommending the interconnections be added to the master plan. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Review staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation&Coastal Management Element(CCME). The project site consists of 40.25 acres of native vegetation; and minimum of 10.06 acres (25%) of the existing native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC reviewed this petition at their June 2, 2016 meeting. The applicant made a presentation and provided a slightly different version of the proposed master plan than the version contained in each Commissioner's packet. Both versions of the master plan illustrated the potential for interconnection from the subject property to Learning Lane, a roadway owned by The School Board of Collier County, Florida. However, the new version eliminated the vehicular component of the access point because the School Board would not allow it. Notwithstanding, the potential for pedestrian interconnection from the subject property to Learning Lane would remain as part of the design. When the public hearing portion of the meeting was opened, four(4) members of the public spoke. Greg Bosco, who represented the Camden Lakes Homeowners Association, spoke in opposition to the project. The other three (3) speakers, (Karen Paul, Barry Weissman, and Fred Smith) expressed their concerns as well. Commissioner Chrzanowski made a motion to approve, which was seconded by Commissioner Assad. The vote to approve was unanimous(7-0)with the understanding the following would be corrected: 1. No vehicular access shall be permitted from the subject property to Learning Lane. Pedestrian access shall be permitted; and 2. Show a continuous preserve area along Learning Lane with an arrow signifying optional pedestrian access. The pedestrian access through the preserve shall be a boardwalk,pervious pathway, or similar composition. Notwithstanding staff's recommendation and the CCPC's unanimous decision to recommend approval, there are still letters/emails of objection for this petition. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a rezone of 12.17 acres of land from the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Packet Pg. 191 9.0 09/13/2016 RMC-Enclave RPUD and an amendment to the existing RMC-Enclave RPUD(Ordinance No.2014-34, as amended). The burden falls upon the applicant for the amendment to prove that the proposal is consistent with all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denial,that such denial is not arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria. Criteria for PUD Amendments Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas,traffic and access, drainage, sewer,water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development(as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities,both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case,based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Packet Pg. 192 9.0 09/13/2016 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a"core"question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (HFAC) Packet Pg. 193 9.0 09/13/2016 RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendations of the CCPC, which are reflected in the attached PUD Ordinance. Staff recommends the Board approves the applicant's request to rezone 12.17± acres (from CFPUD) and incorporate the land area into the existing RPUD, in order to allow for an additional forty-eight (48) residential dwelling units. The developer would also have an alternative option to develop the site with group housing [i.e., up to one hundred and fifty (150) additional units] instead of residential dwellings. Prepared by: Eric L. Johnson, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner, Zoning Division, Growth Management Department ATTACHMENT(S) 1.Attachment 2 -Items Collected by Court Reporter CCPC June 2 2016 (PDF) 2. [Linked] Attachment 3 -Transcipt of CCPC June 2 2016(PDF) 3. [Linked] Attachment 4 - Staff Report and Backup Material (PDF) 4.Attachment 5 -Email Omitted from CCPC Packet (PDF) 5.Attachment 6-Public Notice Signs (PDF) 6.Attachment 1 -Ordinance-081816 (PDF) 7. Legal Ad-Agenda ID 16940000 (PDF) Packet Pg. 194 9.0 09/13/2016 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.0 Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2014-34, the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 12.17± acres of land zoned Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD; by adding 48 residential dwelling units for a total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding 150 group housing units for a total of 500 group housing units; by amending the master plan; by repealing Ordinance No. 11-18, the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD; and by providing an effective date. The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Learning Lane and Livingston Road, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida consisting of 40.55±acres. Meeting Date: 09/13/2016 Prepared by: Title: Planner,Principal—Zoning Name: Eric Johnson 08/04/2016 9:08 AM Submitted by: Title:Division Director-Planning and Zoning—Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 08/04/2016 9:08 AM Approved By: Review: Zoning Michael Bosi Level 1 Sim.Reviewer 1-8 Completed 08/04/2016 10:39 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Level 1 Sim.Reviewer 1-8 Completed 08/08/2016 10:28 AM Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 08/11/2016 11:59 AM Growth Management Department Jeanne Marcella Level 2 Division Administrator Completed 08/15/2016 9:55 AM County Attorneys Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 08/23/2016 9:08 AM County Attorneys Office Jeffrey A.Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorneys Office Review Completed 08/23/2016 9:24 AM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 08/23/2016 10:20 AM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Level 3 OMB 1st Reviewer 1-4 Completed 08/25/2016 8:42 AM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 08/27/2016 10:31 AM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 09/13/2016 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 195 2. /6. 9.C.a /-)-em q JohnsonEric £ 1 c J(hArrn\ From: StrainMark Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:22 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: PL2015...1613 June 2 2016 meeting Please distribute as typical U rLn V 239.252.4446 (3. Under FLorida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this g U office by telephone or in writing. From: B Prins [mailto:bnprins©yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:57 PM To: StrainMark c) co Subject: PL2015...1613 June 2 2016 meeting 0 CNIN Hello Mr. Strain; Thank you for taking the time to read my email. I would like to voice my concerns regarding the June 2 meeting for Q the Collier County Planning Commission for PL2015-1613 RMC- Enclave. I believe that is the correct identifier. 15 I am a resident of Camden Lakes, located at Livingston and Learning Lane in North Naples. N C v U f4 One of the reasons we moved into this neighborhood is because it is surrounded by other single family home developments. We understood that there was the possibility of a church being built on this land, but now the developer is proposing a 500 unit senior 1 Packet Pg. 196 9.C.a living facility, which would be five or six stories tall. There is a big difference between a church steeple and what is basically a high y rise apartment building. co This area is populated by single family homes, a high rise building I would not be compatible with the surrounding homes and a family environment. Please feel free to contact me to discuss. Thank you for your attention to my concerns. Thank you W Nanette Prins 2 co Cn CD Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send N electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. a) U 0- Q.Q. a) 6L 0 U .0 a) a) O U U) E a) N 4C a) E C U f9 w C a) E C U a+ 2 Packet Pg. 197 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: Mike Omann <mikeom@ATS-INC.com> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:55 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Camden Lakes E 0 Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my o family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior a Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on o: staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I a) worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise u building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the w area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single I. family homes instead. co to Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Mike Omann 320-217-4579 0 a. 0 U This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. 8 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the & named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately g by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. If you are not the v intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. d y N O U f6 G d Packet Pg. 198 9.C.a JohnsonEric N From: Cesar Taveras <ctaveras72@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:42 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Camden Lakes 0 a> Dear Commissioner Strain: I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group c7 Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. a I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business a with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family ce neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Crf Thank you for your consideration. w Cesar Taveras 2 G) to CO O N CD C U a U U a) 0 0. a) 0 U a 0 a, 0 a) O U N E N r C a) E 0 lC C a) E t 0 1 Packet Pg. 199 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 11:22 AM m To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: E 0 Ce Please distribute as typical U f4 /Ln Mark 239.252.4446 a. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a p public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. w V From: George King [mailto:george@grizzled.com] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 10:47 AM To: StrainMark Subject: to 0 N N 0 Dear Commissioner Strain, U My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family, homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls E. for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit 00 with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle 0 School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. George King 1 Packet Pg. 200 9.C.a 16293 Camden Lakes Circle Naples, FL 34110 co N v Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send E electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. C9 CI 0 d ca U W U ix tiprn cc N N d t-3 a. U U L Q, L O Na, i.i. 4-a 0 V >1 a, U y O 0 U, E N N C N E V cciQ a, E U a-+ 2 Packet Pg. 201 9.C.a JohnsonEric y 61 From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 4:19 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Opposed to Senior Housing Project _ 0 Please distribute as typical • m U /Ln 0 MGW� C 239.252.'M/16 o_ ce m Under FLorida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address reLeased in m response to a public records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. w U From: M K[mailto:martikaren@hotmaii.corn] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 3:56 PM To: StrainMark c) Subject: Opposed to Senior Housing Project � CD 0 Dear Mr. Strain, I am a resident of Camden Lakes and I am emailing you to voice my concern about the future Enclave Development on your agenda for the meeting on 6/2/2016. I am opposed to a Senior Group Housing Project and I hope you will vote against this project as well. I feel that single family homes would be the best use of the land and would keep a consistent feel and character to the surrounding area. The developer may alternatively request single family homes for the Enclave Development, and I feel this would be a welcomed addition to our neighborhood and keep homogeneity to the area. ,y 0 Thank you for taking the time to read this and for your careful consideration on this important vote. Karen Marti cp Excuse my typos! 0 _ __ Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail~address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. C a) U 4- 4 1 Packet Pg. 202 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: StrainMark 155. Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:06 AM 0° To: JohnsonEric `) Attachments: Camden Lakes; Camden Lakes R E Q Please disburse as typical C9 c Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. a a) a U C W C) 2 0 r O N N C 7 U 0- (.)U a) O a) d-. L O U a) a) c.) 0 C) N E a) C E U C N E s V 1 Packet Pg. 203 9.G.a JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 10:35 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Request From Resident of Camden Lakes E 0 Please distribute as typical ` " L t, Mark (73 239.252.4446 a. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by 2 telephone or in writing. Lc' cc Original Message From: Stephen A. Rogers [mailto:sarogers@intemed.com] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 10:29 AM To: RomanCharlette Cc: ChrzanowskiStan; StrainMark; HomiakKaren; EbertDiane N Subject: Request From Resident of Camden Lakes Dear Ms. Roman, a U We are residents of Camden Lakes emailing you to voice our concern about the Enclave Development proposal . on your agenda for the June 2nd, 2016 meeting. o a CD We are opposed to the Senior Group Housing Facility project and hope that you will align with our interests and g will vote against this project. We feel that single family homes would be the best use of this land as it would 8 keep a consistent feel and character to the surrounding communities. As an alternative, we believe that Enclave ,a Development would be open to constructing single family homes on the site. We feel that this would be a -a welcome addition to our neighborhood and will keep homogeneity to the area. a Thank you for taking the time to consider this request. v Regards, Ellyn and Stephen Rogers C;, 16329 Camden Lakes Circle Naples, FL 34110 tt Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by c telephone or in writing. E 1 Packet Pg. 204 9.C.a JohnsonEric Y From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:06 AM m To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Opposition to Enclave Development .E" E 0 Please disburse as typical ca Marks 239.252.4446 a. a) Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-maiL address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. to U From: Klein, Charmaine [mailto:Charmaine.Klein@aciworldwide.com] Sent:Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:33 PM To: aolis@cohenaw.com; dianeebert@coliergov.net; wfassaad@hotmail.com; HomiakKaren; StrainMark; ChrzanowskiStan; RomanCharlette Subject: Opposition to Enclave Development f9 0 N N Dear Commissioners: I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible a Senior Group Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. The area is a located on the corner of Livingston Road and School Access Road for North Naples Middle School. U This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I recently moved to Naples for work and specifically chose this area because it was family oriented and offered my daughter an environment that was kid friendly and family friendly. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. cs, Thank you for your consideration. c E Charmaine Klein Global Business Leader, Payment Strategy Consumer Payments Product Management 1 Packet Pg. 205 9.C.a Telephone: 239-403-4593 charmaine.klein@aciworldwide,com ACI Worldwide,3520 Kraft Road,Suite 300,Naples,FL 34105 www,aciworldwide.corn Ut N ra • _ .. 9.d� CO C /4X UNIVERSAL. PAYMENTS:. PUTS CUSTOMERS FIRST This email message and any attachments may contain confidential,proprietary or non-public information. The information is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this email,please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any review, dissemination, g use or reliance upon this information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the author personally. ce as Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. w W (> 2 0. CA to N N 0 U 0 U ce .0 U 0 0 V 0 0 G) 0 U U) E 0 N a) E .0 U cif r.+ C 0 E W 2 Packet Pg. 206 9.C.a JohnsonEric 4- N From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM as To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: June 2 meeting - please consider E O d Please disburse as typical I ca /Ln V MGcvk, 239.252.4446 a' Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. U From: Jimmy crick [mailto:crickcovenant@gmail.com] ce Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:51 PM To: StrainMark CO Subject: June 2 meeting - please consider `r Dear Commissioner Strain: N a) I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group z Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. o I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. This area is a wonderful v family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business a. with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. ce O For His Glory, 0 Samantha Crick 0 U) E w C O -- E For His Glory, ctJimmy and Samantha Q 1 Packet Pg. 207 9.C.a For His Glory, Jimmy and Samantha Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. co t4 E O a) V cC (9 a a) > v C w V ce 0 (.0 N a) C U Q. U U a1 .1.+ O 0 d ce z O 4.4 U a) U O 0 U N E a) 5- N C a) E V e-. C O E C' 5 b— 2 Packet Pg. 208 9.C.a JohnsonEric N From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM m To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: June 2 meeting: opposing senior living facility 0 m Please disburse as typical 0 0 ca Mas-k/ 239.252.4446 a a, Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this c office by telephone or in writing. w U .._ 2 From: Jimmy Crick[mailto:jpcsoccerl7@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:42 PM To: StrainMark CO Subject: June 2 meeting: opposing senior living facility co Dear Commissioners, N My family and I reside in Camden Lakes,which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my v family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior a2 Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the o area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. U I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. 0 James P. Crick,Jr., PT, DPT N a) Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. a, U t® w a) E 0 r-. 4 1 Packet Pg. 209 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Learning Lane - Senior Living Facility E 0 cc Please disburse as typical U t4 rL^ Mcu-k. tz 239.252.4446 a cc Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this �a U office by telephone or in writing. 6 From: John S. Sarrett[mailto:jsarrett@sarrettlaw.com] t Sent:Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:36 PM To: StrainMark a, co Subject: Learning Lane- Senior Living Facility • Dear Commissioner: o N N My family and I reside in the Camden Lakes community, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact t the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. My wife and I am very opposed to the Enclave v Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that a Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, and be a potential risk to along the students, including my children, at 0 Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I will remind the commissioner that the county does not provide buses for the children living in Camden Lakes, and the increased traffic a senior living w facility would create could be an extreme danger for these young children walking to school. a U I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. a' U John S. Sarrett w JOHN S. SARRETT,P.A. 999 Vanderbilt Beach Road Suite 200 Naples,FL 34108 Main: (239) 325-3350 1 Packet Pg.210 9.C.a Direct: (239) 330-2359 Facsimile: (239) 790-5063 Website: www.sarrettlaw.com N Sent from my iPhone m ------------------- Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 0 d cC 'Ln 16 CL I.i.. V W cU GNy tD N CL U 15. Q. "CS m a) 6 a) tU tC Q C s-+ Q 2 Packet Pg. 211 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: StrainMark r Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM m To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Camden Lakes E 0 Please disburse as typical c6 rLn V Madrki ca 239.252.4446 a. ce Under Florida Law, e-maiL addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address reLeased in > response to a public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this ca office by teLephone or in writing. _ From: Alex Chinea [mailto:achinea4@gmail.com] 2 Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:30 PM To: HomiakKaren; asolis@cohenlaw.com; EbertDiane; wfassaad@hotmail.com; StrainMark Subject: Camden Lakes 0 Dear Commissioners, a> c.) I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Groupa. Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. m I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. 0 U Thank you for your consideration. -a a) u Alex Chinea °' 0 a> Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. .,. E t U l-. y,. 4_-. 0 E U a-+ 1 Packet Pg. 212 9.C.a JohnsonEric N From: StrainMark - Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:04 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Sr housing E O d Please disburse as typicalets Mark/ 239.252.4446 a- m Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address reLeased in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this c office by teLephone or in writing. U From: Scott Mcconnell [mailto:swmccon@gmail.com] Ir Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 6:02 PM To: StrainMark v, Subject: Sr housing 0 Dear Commissioner Strain, N a� c a U My family and I reside in Camden Lakes,which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am U reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my o family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior a a Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise °� building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. E Sent from iPad Scott McConnell a E C) Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. E U a+ 1 Packet Pg. 213 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:04 AM m To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Opposition to Enclave Development E O Please disburse as typical MaYly 239.252.4446 a Under FLorida Law, a-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address reLeased in response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. LLI U From: CVRC [mailto:cvrc1226@gmail.com] rt Sent:Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:57 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Opposition to Enclave Development co Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my 23 family and those living here in Camden Lakes. We are very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. We worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers n and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area,along with the students at c) Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. We hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single N family homes instead. E Thank you for your time and careful consideration. ° Best Wishes, Christy and Norman Ruiz-Castaneda ° R Packet Pg. 214 9.C.a Sent from my iPhone 1-1) , . „ - . • '4"; Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. CO E Ct Ct Lu C-) 2 a)•• to v- a) t 0 O. 0 s:2 U) E a) a) E 4'3 4E CU 2 Packet Pg. 215 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: greg pryer <gulfcrest@centurylink.net> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 10:03 AM m To: charlerreroman@colliergov.net; ChrzanowskiStan; StrainMark; cc wfassaad@hotmail.com; EbertDiane; asolis@cohenlaw.corn; HomiakKaren Subject: Enclave Developers Ln / V Dear Commissioner, a. When I was searching for a community in which to purchase my home, I was impressed with Camden Lakes as ce it contained only single family homes as did the surrounding communities. The zoning around us did not allow high rise housing so this was the perfect place to buy my home as it would remain low density. I don't think that a commercial senior group high rise housing project is the correct use of land surrounding our 2 community. We are family neighborhoods and would like it to remain that way. cc I hope we can count on you to not approve this project. Thank you, o Gregory W. Pryer N 16202 Camden Lakes Cir. Naples,Fl. 34110 239-596-3499 NQS f.f. .7t N V N r., U N C' 4C "i4' Packet Pg. 216 9.C.a JohnsonEric N From: greg pryer <gulfcrest@centurylink.net> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 10:26 AM m To: HomiakKaren Cc: asolis@cohenlaw.com; dianeebert@colliegov.net; wfassaad ; StrainMark; ChrzanowskiStan; RomanCharlette Subject: Enclave Development rL^ Eric J. Palm 16202 Camden Lakes Cir.,Naples,Fl. 34110 co a Dear Commissioner, aD ea I would like you to oppose the high rise senior housing project being proposed by Enclave Development. Our 72w community, Camden Lakes, is comprised solely of single family homes as are our surrounding developments. The best use of this land would be to retain the low density single 2 family development which I understand that the developer has proposed as an alternative use. We would very much appreciate your opposing the commercial high rise senior project in favor of the single family concept. C° Thank you, Eric J. Palm U a. U C3 QD w O 0. NCD I.L 0 U .0 m CD O Cl) E N N N E U f6 Q N E U 1 Packet Pg. 217 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: Jan Epperson <janpepp316@aol.corn> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 2:34 PM To: m StrainMarkca Subject: Multi Senior Dwellings Proposed near Camden Lakes Dear Commissioner Strain, • _ /Ln I am writing to ask you NOT to allow the zoning to be changed so that these "Multi Dwelling Buildings" can be g built near"Camden Lakes" on "Livingston." I live in Camden Lakes near my daughter and her husband and 3 sl children. These buildings would cause so much more traffic on "Livingston" and "Learning Lane." This is a. where my Grandchildren walk to school and ride their bikes. It is a safe and wonderful residential area now for many families to raise their children, I would hate to see this change. U I don't understand why"Multi Dwelling Buildings" would be allowed to be build amongst many residential areas such as "Camden Lakes." I am in Seattle and will not be able to be at the meeting but will be hoping and praying that you do NOT allow this zoning to be changed and these buildings to be built. Thanks you for your time, (° Jan Epperson 0 16229 Camden Lakes Circle "' Naples, Fl. 34110 Mobile 425-478-9334 a_ '6 a) I.L. N N U N _ O U r.+ re 1 Packet Pg. 218 9.C.a JohnsonEric N From: Kraiza, Jonathan <jkraiza@massmutual.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 11:39 AM m To: StrainMark t° Subject: 6/2 Agenda: Enclave Developers - opposition to Senior Group Housing F 0 a) Commissioner Strain,- fa L I am emailing you to voice my concern about the future Enclave Development on your agenda for the meeting on June c9 2nd. As a resident of Camden Lakes,the residential community adjacent to this land,we selected this location due to the a great schools and fantastic family residential corridor that this portion of Livingston Road has become. A commercial ce business with apartment style/high rise buildings and workers on staff simply does not fit well in this area. This type of business could negatively impact everyone living in the surrounding area as well as the students of nearby Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I understand the developer is also considering single family w homes for the Enclave Development,and I feel this is the best use of the land and would keep a consistent feel and character to the area. a) Thank you for your careful consideration on this important vote. •- Jonathan Kraiza Csi N a) This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary,privileged and/or confidential and is a. intended exclusively for the person(s)to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying,retention or disclosure by any 8 person other than the intended recipient or the intended recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not w; the intended recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all a copies. o:° z a) 0 U N 1= fC ar Ie tC 1 Packet Pg.219 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: Dominic Polito <djpolito97@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 1:33 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Senior Group Housing Facility E 0 m Dear Mark Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your su a could pport on a very important issue that impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed w to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls r for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This t fit with ype of dwelling does not the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility o would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the d area, along U with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. eL My wife and I are retired and have put our savings into this property. We believe that & our property values will decrease dramatically if this facility is built. ci We are hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 5 2016 and support single family homes instead. U Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Dominic and Joan Polito N 16306 Winfield Lane E Naples, FL 34110 E Camden Lakes Residents 1 E Packet Pg. 220 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: Joanna Ritchie <joannaritchie@bellsouth.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:30 PM m To: StrainMark co Subject: Development on Livingston Road E O N Hi Commissioner Strain, a) /Ln My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am 0 reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my Q family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior a Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on rt staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise c building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the w area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. 2 I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Sincerely, U James and Joanna Ritchie a 16171 Cartwright Ln,Naples, FL 34110 239-443-8161 O a. 41 0 U .0 4- 0 U O U N E N O E 0 R3 Q + C i- U) E 0 1 Packet Pg. 221 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: Nicole Marco <nicolemarco@outlook.com> Q Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:46 PMct To: StrainMark Subject: Re: Enclave E 0 Dear Commissioner Strain: I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group c5 Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. This area is a wonderful family o residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business with a_ seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family a, neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. Nicole & Peter Marco 2 ce a) co 7: N V n U V a) Y L 0 0. a) 0 U c 0 a> 0 U U) E a) N C a) E 0 fS) Q 4E E 0 R J.+ 4-a 1 Packet Pg. 222 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: Peter Marco <Pete.Marco@outlook.com> a Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:30 PM To: StrainMarktz Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane E 0 a) U C) ca 'Ln V C1 From: Peter Marco a Sent:Tuesday,May 31, 2016 3:23 PM ce To: Markstrain@colliergov.com Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane c w U 2 Mark, a) I am written in concern to the Enclave project across from Camden Lakes community on Livingston road. I am a current resident in Camden Lakes, and my children will be attending North Naples Middle school over the next several years. I have great concerns about proposal to add a secondary access on learning lane. I believe N the additional traffic will create risk to children that will be walking and biking to school. The increase in traffic will cause congestion at the intersection that will increase possibility of accidents. a Since this access is only secondary and not essential, I ask that you reject the builder request to add the additional access on learning lane. ° Thank you! ce Peter Marco 0 .a C) 4i U a) 0 0 U) E C) r C a) E V CS w+ 4- C a) E U C) a+ 1 Packet Pg. 223 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 1:30 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane E 0 Please distribute as typical Ma-rk> 239.252.4446 a a Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in > response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this m office by telephone or in writing. U From: Peter Marco [mailto:Pete.Marco@outlook.com] cc cc Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:30 PM •• To: StrainMark a) Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane ;- cc O a) From: Peter Marco Sent:Tuesday, May 31,2016 3:23 PM U To: MarkstrainPcolliergov.com a; Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane o a a) t Mark, I am written in concern to the Enclave project across from Camden Lakes community on Livingston road. I am a current resident in Camden Lakes, and my children will be attending North Naples Middle school over the next several years. I have great concerns about proposal to add a secondary access on learning lane. I believe v the additional traffic will create risk to children that will be walking and biking to school. The increase in traffic will cause congestion at the intersection that will increase possibility of accidents. 0 N Since this access is only secondary and not essential, I ask that you reject the builder request to add the E. additional access on learning lane. U Thank you! 4- Peter Marco 1 Packet Pg. 224 9.C.a JohnsonEric Y From: William Benavitz <rosemary.benavitz@icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:24 PM m To: StrainMark t° Subject: Oppose Enclave Developers 0 Dear Commissioner Strain, -0 My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my a family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior &- Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise U building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2,2016 and support single c family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Sincerely, Rosemary Benavitz U 0. U Sent from my iPhone 1.1. .1+ O y N a 1 Packet Pg. 225 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 7:15 AM m To: JohnsonEriccts Subject: FW: requesting your consideration of petition #PUDA-PL-2015-1613 R Please distribute as typical - - R 0 MGL-rk/ 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in > response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this ea U office by telephone or in writing. w From:Tanya Bosco [mailto:tanya.bosco@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:20 AM •• To: HomiakKaren; asolis@cohenlaw.com; EbertDiane; wtassaad@hotmail.com; StrainMark Subject: requesting your consideration of petition #PUDA-PL-2015-1613 Good morning, Ms Homiak, Mr Solis, Ms Ebert, Mr Assaad, Mr Strain, Mr Chrzanowski, and Ms Roman, N N I am writing to you all collectively as a member of the Camden Lakes subdivision,a wonderful community of g single family homes in North Naples. I am also a concerned homeowner hoping to garner your support on an issue that could have a lasting impact on the lives of my family and all those living here in Camden Lakes. a. U I am highly opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility on the plot of land a) referenced in the subject line, located at the intersection of Learning Lane and Livingston Road. a a) Not only would a multi-style/high rise building with its many workers and staff to support a senior living facility destroy the single family home experience of our community, but also this type of dwelling does not fit U with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides and has the potential to destroy preserved land that was a major draw for us as residents. C.) I am deeply concerned that this type of facility will detract from the appearance and value of our neighborhood, o and more important, will pose a great risk to our community's students at both Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle Schools with increaded E traffic and service vehicles, as well as a commercial vehicle increase. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held this morning and support single family homes instead while maintaining as much of the preserve as possible to maintain the environment and 2 aesthetics. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. a> E Best Regards, f Tanya Bosco 1 Packet Pg. 226 9.C.a 16345 Camden Lakes Circle , Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send CO electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. E C.) 0 as CIa). Ct ccs 11.1 0 2 a) Q. a) 0. a) 0 "CS 0 0 E a) 4J a) E a) E 2 Packet Pg. 227 9.C.a JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 1:29 PM To: JohnsonEric m Subject: FW: Enclsve Development Attachments: Enclave Strain.pdf E O Please distribute as typical L r3 Marks ❑ 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in g response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:john fritzel [mailto:fritzelcj@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 10:48 AM To: StrainMark Subject: Enclsve Development to Mark, N CD Please find our attached objection to the Enclave Development. We feel it would negatively impact our property values. It does not fit with the single family corridor on Livingston Road. There a are several assisted or senior housing units at Livingston and Vanderbilt to meet the needs of seniors in the area. Respectfully, John and Charlene FritzeleG 16112 Camden Lakes Circle Naples, Fla. 34110 U r m .Q Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. N O U rn E a) N a) E tR C W E U a.. Z Q 1 Packet Pg. 228 - 9.C.a f6 Dear Commissioner �.�_ ; ` mac coco My family and I reside in Camden Lakes,which is a wonderful community of single family homes. 0 I a.m.reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could T. impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the c9 Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls forco apartment style/high.rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with a. the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. cC I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. N N / -;;774.'-- f , +-'S `— 174—C =��' 6y.JL u✓ % // y:r {'.. a.U f cp cp • c.417,, O U N • U cn ca c f6 Packet Pg. 229 eAelou3 oval : P690 91.0Z Z aunt 3d33lepoelei 41n03 Aq pelaeilao swell -z 4uewipepv quewipenv c) co .V.. co (..i (NI a_ci) 15...,.„. . (.) III N.. = z >-. 0 c7) a. 1 I Nit, kP co Z JOJO o ct ci-. w Lu w ..j < < 4 0 0 = I—, < I— w **..' Lt-I Cl) CD w 1...... Cl) 2 > Z N j \•\\? co I__ C) rr 0 LU A.A. ---.. N.N.) 3 Z 0 0 - • I___ 11.1 Cl) Lii CO CC .. CC Lu < cc ma' 9 0 1-ij U-1 cu (N cn co uj 1-1-1 Li j CL .• ic'::3 '''(..w re c.f) co I 0 < z -J .... ,,...:..4 N"•• Z w `-' 0 .tt I- L° l— c) c> 0 120 Z c\I its co 'f:-:E- 0 0 ---.„ w x LU ci.. ....... •= 2 cols- it m a. , i_ a. a 11LL u. < < cu. Lu 010 Z CIE I= u_ c5- < C-) 0 0 1-1-1 0 0 =g e. . 0 ..., ....• cc — a) gs . Lu - -- >- u_ 2_ 4..• o o ,,,u) 0 --1 wm.o. c., z “.., F.... cc LII- C,) Lu E 0 u) ili M Ca ‹C P W LL 00 < 'V a• tb u_ I— C CO C.) „---J Cl) w CC 0 LU 0 cw o- .— m X c, x u.. R Z C) IL I= L u zI-- 1-- 0- 0 z z 3 Lu w < < LL, 4 ,, 0 z cl z 0 cc A-L- z 0 Lu .. . i.. c.,) ,_ 0 < CC %.,.; i_.., s• a.. i z w o eN z co c Z •- 0 cr up LLI 22 z 0 E ,t; 00 . -- i__ ,_ E5 = cc LL — , LU 11.1 * Li.: co 0 CD a 0 w cc) 0 +NJ < 2 13 CU CL = co C al a 0 a_ co >•- c a; a) E a. a) co a) * Z cc eAelau3 pm : 17691") 91.Q Z aunt 3d33 lepodeel lifO3 Aq pelaafloo swell -z lueuigoeliv : uaWq{3ellV i (a c., U cri 6 a a = z a >- U z W cc C,,,.'' '-' '-\'. ' m 0 E-- !-z E J ao cc 20 Jz8 a Z w = wo Cn CO w > Z Z. � � o pw C!= tif z 0 = p W ''s''', ?, c''N' ? 5 Oc), �C = w Q = = o ® YY W iN Q Q E'er W Q cp d -� 0Qw W cnm I ON O z z 4 ll ,.1 c> < � i= _ v -' 0 co 00 !- o F- m !— Wz = Z � _ .2 .� c.j F- F- W o- t1LL f-- u. ®0. o ¢ m ¢ _ zW W 0 �, zc� 0 p co J !"�' — ccoQ O R.- cc W CO _z = Oa_ CC O � O 0000 ILE? I- ...0 W IIIMIONE U w - /- CC cwW m CU •° it; _> a O = _ uu_ - ¢ ¢ W WI o LU CS Ct 1n z co CD F_ = O z F- 0) om = Z �- 2 Z o E— Q �} p c,, m O0 � m =1 >— ul M Op C LU z F- "4"--' F- CI- O C 0 < Cr) W o -I LL ¢ zw W CC oz G] E 3u) II_- z Cc ILI F- zz Q ocri zw0 iii Fij ® zw C'\ Thz as QOCC M EW- I-- v) U \ cc 11- z z uJ ,�40.70 p ¢ W pE=- a. U 151) co CC m •c = m 0al �. cu •E as a) enepu3 3Wni : 690 91,0Z Z aunr 3d33 aapodej linos icq pa;oaa sura o co #C - Z guautyoe;3`d :�uau�yae;>tbr N V M a; N a w Y Zr- z a w J v 0 e w >. < 0 LC c---...., a a � p � _j z0 W -' wa z u-' Lu ...1 N_! I- O °¢- QE_- V ¢ mw CO taw !— w I•- a Lr 0 - CC a00 L� z �" CO wconE Q cc) Q "-I w <- �1 a: No ¢ O wQ a L.1 � c> ¢ w CW cmnm I J o CO I- , O zOz Q w Q .// ¢ hw- Z M' z m 0 ai 0 o = Nzw Z m0 . LL- V Q zit aa. O CLo QmI-- t� w 17i cs oO 0cn J zw a: o < t) 00 W CtU) OO J m0 LC cf.) Z l ' m0w = z � W o = ww O MINN 0 1�'- 0m0 O -JLU U wI= ~ CC cWw --I CIS -a i6 cc O = m °' co ¢ I- ua LL 00 Q C Q ¢ wco Li- gO W W 0 n _zFz- _ Fa2 N 0) coCD MI 0 z Q mm Z u- 2 Z Q c‘, O - < 0 O Lu I= ozlw_ M0 mw LC O o < co W 0 --I LL z Qw W Z 0 cc CC oz m \J o z w u) LU cc 0 (7 F- t-- w W ® v� � � w O za v a Z 1 w ow Q Occop W v' z 0 E �I . [rw � I- zw W Q) 0 Lu wm („� d _i 0 — I Q 0 —' W 0m . a 0ci cc0 73 G: C m c iii v m OACI3U3 3lim : /69L) 91.92 Z aunr 3d33la iodazd urtop fig pepafa3 sLuali - Z l a`...ut.,53e}.v :.uaLuipelly M c6 N U ch a Y CC Q) Y V co = 0 LL Cr) 0 co Z "4 CE >- p = uJ >- m0t-- F o .J CO Z � o W -"' 0 2 c<t 0E- --1L W Z w • oa Q1 U � \ � mo (J) w > _Z `-1 LU ca ~ O LU 0w C a.: CD 0 G5 tl.l 0 � W <t � 0 d CC z 0 p Y W i- rY[) Q F"' W ¢ J ]. 1 Nli - r QW LLI m CL ~ (!) o Ni_z �c WJ IIIHh< NzW Z m � p . .9. 0 E-- LLJ LL LL LL I- 0. - Q LL m Q Z J LLJ 0? ; ZCD0 o 0Cn ..I immi "- cco < V o0 W o � m os" f-- CO E co zw = cc p U 0 cn 0 ® -I-'-.i Li- 0 W 1111111111101 - al I-- S Cr) W J t1� -= '� _> cc O z CO 13 a N ¢ w V- 0 ~ `Y G.) �- J Go u- < o F- tL9 Q "? z1_ _ cc CD H cv 0 . W I 0 „ Li., M . ...T.:, O 0 V 0 < u) LU 0 � LL_ 14-1 s z® °- --1 > zI- Z UJ C7)5: 0CZCf) ® SQ. 0 tic 1-1-1m0 * Luca U J _i -- ACL � z S om LL. COU ! ai c = co a co Citi; >” 07 !k, C 0 L s a 9.C.a 4-. Table A Cl) Land Use Trips °' m Daily Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour c Land Use Trips Generated Trips Generated Trips Generated .2 Size (ADT) (vph) (vph) g O 04 --> Single-Family 48 d.u.'s 535 43 54 (LUC 210) co .-7 Senior Housing 150 d.u.'s 516 30 38 (LUC 252) a ALF 150 d.u.'s 411 27 44 _; (LUC 254) As U ct c CCR Community 150 d.u.'s 375 41 79 c.D.: lii (LUC 255) ce v 0) 0 Church 500 Seats 925 305 N/A (LUC 560) (Sunday) (Sunday) tO f CV 0 Daycare Center 150 Students 657 170 N (LUC 565) 108 c 0 0 0 0 4'4'1". L O Q �C) I.L. c 0 U .0 a) 4J v a) 0 0 N ca N C) E S 0 a-+!a 4- C a) E c n 4,41 1 Packet Pg.234 anuiou9 °INNN : 47694) 940Z Z aunt 3d33 aapodeN pno3 i(q pa}oollo3 swell -Z 4uowgo 7 : uau c{oe}4(13 r) N o m� zooz �¢o I E Elg ° 0) N ! pp e r 116 rD a- , ,-- 0 2 z 0)Z a W 0 a U oto 0< 0 w= Z VJO ¢0 i;i' () H ¢ (zN OU tAQ 2Utbp /rJ UnO 2s Z QU `0 No h- z<0 , �=< r j,// /i/ am 1. 0lacn ��U— �v)�c�' ,. ,, u6i0 z W W K DHOW dZ0Z %i Q r z , o- z �nw a>¢ co tz—,c m�u ,: O�`� Zm U 11 m F / /;/ 9 .'q O� z� O O O N r r/ �t,, \�'J / nwO Q SW la O ,r , LU 0❑ W W � v ,, / Z QFZ6 > '�/ J U 3 N Up 6 m 7 cc 7 > / %% ; .. ° V ''aIZ = O -, X2X X2X w Q O /;/ ;Iry ,, / / U =Ce o Fc 0- J �O 7) I- 22 a / ;i' /' f /' / to Ow ii ,', / ' i/ CC q / ,/,')/ / / U rz / / ri ,/ ,/ O X / �/ /�! / / o v r �o / %W IT U / W I Q Z "frrW Z / 1 i 21 / e gs QaW a o20 /J II �€ m 6 z cc w / E r ZLi 0 �/�' // w �`� •m 1 _-- = , ---------------- ` I•% W C 9 E Ir_ m 6$ , w o ® e O w Z a ,2e { w N� Q� W 07_ `' col' �O J az ., I z >-o 1318 u.wu : p CL win E E Ow Q CC QQQ aw l FH w lll'. . i O" 1 `t 0 OQ ,'.' cn W W �ZflH 1azt eE 0 _J °z - Qow gE � �D W 1 z6 / ¢�a O i1 o sooe z iii e Ce 0 - 1NM WCL Q Fh"06 W d' �✓�-y;,7t+• i'�I 1 W a'� til 5 Cn• i i ONS J W Oz 6zw QU 6 w-Iuj z0 0 EC 2 LU z2— Quo Li oz°� zW. Ul .. pm zW N D O 0) N D eq anepud 3IAlef : b696) 9602 Z aunr 3d33 Japode lanoo i(q paloalloo swall -Z lu.awgoelit( :luewyoelid to coM ii <U t4 r .co g. 4 24` F D. r C3L E F /i N k4 o ' = 4i4(2,414',.^14.4, ',,'4 t ! ,,,a. O 4 ,', z ' 2 / ` . <•< w • l ww ce { WEOQ jt tea ` A i ' \. f� t i Z d 1z e w ZOQQNd 410° € 1, Li --- II / fiY,aajm. O 1�f 2 • !� z ( - Yi-" - d` �t U �� Z re Q I ' _ _ Xf-- A ; L vMr ' s `. 5 w � I 3a, arr 's b oi IA a 4Q CL Ii- Y = JWy ,� , cam,,, " U < C7 Z O '^ € o , of.-:!...` /LI':,:, Ei • w e ; 1 a ONI N r 1 o. �,-'_ -lie- sem• a! T { ._. o � x l j J o ww , IUw e ,� a : , e'qi 1 i �L— ti� Q v-ka �f ' 1 5.1 r , �E,r�.. �. ? � { � t t Z,a e ti ,:• gay ii; Y�zq ' � 9.C.d JohnsonEric From: golfoftn@comcast.net S m Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 6:10 PM a. LL To: JohnsonEric o Subject: Re: RMC/Enclave Project2 U Thx Eric cn Actually it would be great if u can get the history for me and then if we can pull all the public notices and lists m of companies and individuals who got those notices for both parcels I can come and review those. Thx. c 'c- co Eco Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone E 0 m Original message a) R From: JohnsonEric c. Date: Mon, Feb 22, 2016 5:34 PM c To: golfoftn@comcast.net; ra Cc: DeaneConnie;BellowsRay;BosiMichael;SanchoBrandon; a Subject:RE: RMC/Enclave Project2 a. au Good afternoon,Mr. Paul. Yes, I did receive your entails. I apologize for not contacting your sooner-I am still trying to 6 figure out how to best answer your questions. I will have to do some research regarding the history of the property in w question and get back to you. I don't want to be too hasty and give you the wrong answers. o 2 By the way, you are always more than welcome to review the files)yourself. We can set up an area in the office where .. you can review at your own leisure and request copies of documents as you see fit. Let me know if that is a more a) attractive option for you. C) Respectfully, ca a.U Eric L.Johnson,AICP, CFM a U Principal Planner v Growth Management Department-Planning&Regulation E 0 Zoning Division-Zoning Services Section a) 2800 North Horseshoe Drive cs Naples,FL 34104 •E— phone: phone: 239-252-2931 0 fax: 239-252-6503 el-3 E w ca PEE[ caE b rier County ..E co �. C a) E From:golfoftn@comcast.net [mailto:golfoftn@comcast.net] U Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 11:04 AM coQ To:JohnsonEric<ericiohnson(�colliergov.net<a="">></ericiohnson@colliergov.net<> Subject: Fw: RMC/Enclave Project 1 Packet Pg. 237 9.C.d Hello Eric Forwarding u my last message.Not sure u got it as I did not hear from you. Please let me know the process for getting this info. Much appreciated.George Paul Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone n. u_ U Original message - From:eolfoftn @comcast.net Date:Thu,Feb 18,2016 3:35 PM To:ericjohnson @colliergov.net; Subject:RMC/Enclave Project Hello Eric 00 George Paul here.We met Tuesday night at the church. I wanted to request a couple things from the County and appreciate your help getting my request handled. Thx...we need: cts1)a complete summary history of both parcels bordering learning lane and Livingston road. We are looking for when it started as a parcel of agricultural land, when it became a parcel for a church and another for agricultural,when it changed to residential along with the church. Just looking for dates and when zoning changes were approved. Just a brief history. ,L^ 2)Copies of all public notices affecting both parcels and when they we mailed out and a list of who they were mailed to. c Thank u for your help. Let me know when I can come to your office and review and pick up these docs. a Thank u Eric. George Paul ca Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone w Under Floada Law,e-mail addresses are public records.if you do not warn your P ma r address released in response to a public records request do not send electronic mail to.his entity.Instead,contact this office cv telephone or in writing. 115 Y U a U a v c.) E 0 L a) E 0 r E uJ Q) E .L. U fa caE 0 2 Packet Pg. 238 lsp.des ueluewoa aoeic pue and i eAeloua OWH : P696) su61S eotloN ollgnd -9 luawgoenv :luauayae,4y M 4) N U P• ► L_T• S k. o- m (CHAPTER 8,COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) a A zoning sign(s)must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen(15)calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s)must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code,Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s)must be securely affixed by nails,staples,or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post,or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s)in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY,PERSONALLY APPEARED Sharon Umpenhour WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER -PL20150001613-R nclave RPUD Alittr IA '1 �a. 1J 4 3800 Via Del Rey SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O.BOX Sharon Umpenhour Bonita Springs, FL 34134 NAME(TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY,STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this St day ofAUgUSt , 20 16, by Sharon Umpenhour identification p , personally known to me er-eke-preA�teed and who did/did not take an oath. 401 PT6ec JOANNE JANES ( Suture of Notatiy Pu�c MY COMMISSION#FF 090820 --` r '1 -15— EXPIRES:Budget EXPIRES:March14,2018 rFarfl.°`��° Joanne Janes F. ' Bonded Thru Bud t NotaryServices Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev.3/4/2015 9.C.e ,,1. a,. ¢1▪1< o�-a :� ,at'- £x max " 'a, t- '. £*'i' m6ya�'.,�..s ��'. pa x .c4A,ae'x`c�•p ": o V ' bFaR t ' o.:cm . '6 W ^'• /y ,$ " a :5za• gcy m ac '.''�^!_�` " i"+ %wq x a o f� oQ. =.',14", '•�Y P 1 w m c u i,.a -+ f to i' '``*gDuly+¢ ."lv,•iaS, o � 4",">>"W4 0. g s-�. fd' O�FC�9• � Nom'" ,..:,')/,.,,:;,;,-.14.1-,-,:,-,...,,,-,,,g, 2 v` Gia�� . ...! P .` i'.N J 6` C. 4i a Cbl !Es w+ � } -$c V-#4•32 u '"'Q' •°� rx-. x qdq er ra eZ = ' '* �+xu m o . S�e w s 0. rn `°, iaaa ,,: 'r >o,'�', gi' *a x '"' 2 W "��"� `x''rc�'� .ia�a "�' r n ne[peau�$ V lY ..,��@@'' +yso+a[ o.u+u'' O N 1 y> "�"k` ;sr�4�"fe p ',-,"'-M,2 �*�1 O p C i+ iLf ( C# N x N V '�' 'yy�ly"` fi Y �,� �C tS N� U d_4.).7,77.-',„ f, 7�f0 7�f�m� i(D " '`illi 3u, '�e+.te#0'� 's +". +�. r i4' to,..ni.w •ww Qom,, L p ",15crt i. w iEy, � 0 ,,'�Nr <• m. as s< _c as � .,F>� .,y�+ ,6▪'4iC`V Vi <: •r�� g�` Zq• �, }: moi V , ', =q t v ae'"$ 0�..3�' .; +w.rw-,-,--'..J.,,. -'m'n xK i,'a.uN 7l@ "- N •' N cio 'R a', '�- n w� V a 0 +4.1 w '"*.a.1!";74'..' 765"G q y-3'ta y;r ` �� as c�F r��rX ,g5q„g xi .�Eta `x Qua ,� � R,yS C�rF. '°y, a.S• ysp OH 'y. ,' Ifi�;":":7211"1: uR tl is 7t a i t" t?a.. a p` yw�y [ •H• SAwt_+IC ~$; Q -?i•�' ' :411,--, W K Au 06 ri ILL F { �.. ,ij�'4'k'�"ri �tf �aYalt�Sim Q'� w'`''•a.'; r." "..L� ,-1,..,...,...a-,at�. `'rYG�y s•., t6 '"*r' s`,°P a.: o o .o ae s y��.... 4►x- "nu '#a ai; m a- 3 "?Q m R►91 ,Li',2 4 m 'p 'F.;:.r' , 11 + ;ash b' ... � ' � ��m� r�'c s C Oa,r�s ,• ,� `� -.."-. W - .,..isMQ�mu ori a�. N oaa��66�e �^ p▪� c' ax-.�- a� � ,r; �3xa'ax -. qua 0 #alp q+ ik' y' w.. ,:c4-'71 ;;• n� {4s,,}Vii: 2 6 6.g s.. N N ,,. C i�k~t_ f� aYt w. u 6 N �� ' $ � m p a4.uuuyx .o.1-'o' f4 may. p y.,p� T"'i-" j ' RyR:-,:',..44,t==i i r,-,''' L - t g st 4^'yF�i(4 W 4 Q i. _fl CL m �� J- ,yS`y.��¢( y.1''!� mt�'. /D A ti`��a4"t �l.��+twz N' �iu� N t7. u -,'.:,.‘,•,;_,,,,-„,.,,,,-,,_.. .2;;;;:::;t- � Ltate"al8� O W7ue W." V 6" ,`� Y ' P-E7 'u �x�v�i eii. 1�-�W E s c iLi:::;t-a.4 ^a. . ,-, �. Q3 s .1....?„ Q t- :> ' a ex-i s tH-a esa c W VS O'�?" C M � tl a▪s�. art =k GT.�., .ss= ar` ,#t 2-=..i>a4,24. Q!- Wl cu or $ c. cm+, ILI= +u m u 214, q.et � co0 g ,I `v e�ea' �lmm+ix.+�it c�"'i,m tica'' , „„2e,yiy��'tao<a Y.'x.r1ge01-s"F ..0 . la /7 'Stx s �''., .YJId 7�i tai c R"c '�K3 ....8 am`- �.� ce c W v ce mr W' a o . _ ca co y�_H 4 HW .lu C▪ Z 9-m.... .0 2 d Di Cl,.�.. « iK .7..1 CIC xC5p di W VJ � SFC A• V H H,u..+.iJ S `� 0 z':4xm'z.w 'c :C o .j i6 �'Rxmc w'-P� a 1=:!,., V xaBaO a. 11-4 tj O ! q'X...sp vG 6 •Y ..OAR ,_.,„.a....,..,- a .... 16! 2b.-..r..=,-4.K O 0 i��r YI I `z'�r xyl-Q� t, LL Z m"P -Z�`w F- �++e x tgPi a S C.T C•'' a C,) � � a..m• °d°d ai> `c o rri g n`'m°' +.+� a co WU C:1 "t4', z _261 :z n. w (2 * a,a w m x. u .c — It maz:xxu .a { .- Rai ?,.,2.4=.516'S=. mca a zg; voa.- w d a..� WU w m x ss r.,1, t'es ZS= I p n x x x a., z ra: at _ t St i G/! � m Wx111541741!3',4 mua<� �ra �.,y � x'd.R.� xxxx:r oma. .¢ eC i�BAR CI �'+` ow.x E.. W"'H x o :cc ua, N o a v Rr� to.._ ,a' ast ;�`iGzrm''".�w C~3 d¢d a (Q ~.:Lil =t'x�zuY zaw �`" Ns�^a C '....1 '..,,,,,-,„,t,Q 'sgz ¢ �-+ • Li.1 4'oKum g wm. W<e U7 ,. a m m Y j m ¢ O [J�h i .'�f, u2�, m`S r'.N M .Z.Z t',.4,4 LF N C-' E IJJ bgnsaaa Caa t4aa .� : Kana ywgzQ, "tai .0 V :a ca .t a2i W., a Y-a ;.,-.•.--:. .;:.., m,•.-- >>H� 0�: :gam U 01CC F " 2 z a p�- ui 0S � �c -ma -,5'.471.-..5,' ozz2� . to a'�... 0- w n w K A C� H V a S U 6 6 N 'a Q .W Ci' W x p K? d �" Lill �u x• p_ S H .— ., IAA 44.. a".9,2:.;,=.E, ..-; ct--xg• H'F �a'.s"'• {'. x ¢� ~,tg2m 2.., vw C �" . F C K�m2x _ ¢ C.) yr P'2 ._ -'d <:'61- 0- E • g fJ2o...w x � wg -- ¢ '1'`i'fa a 0�.. G?— • tYi .t..„.15--„1.,_t e-m p:�a o.[ s"o. �"' ®q�®;p wa 2:wa Li 2.-.4" 4. 4— .0 a x y N • a m tl.9W O .-444.„,... U q G F y 8 V ,•i ym+"x..mj? ccr o� '„'1,,. O Fyo� 3n Pta mQ CO. .'J x m ga .¢o sw LL`7 rt•- xx• <uW w .r. Q W- R x x q .-,6•-ii- �° c:, ct'i^4'o y a .n x rn. wµxW qua •"K C''a P µv2 ,cmc- d[may z N G3 0.0. lij .µ. O t- ,1 ' �, 2 2.iY O C..z�` L.= M E: �'` b Z ? 1- .., Q x P'q m ci u..C -.P~. H Q ▪to ca 2 Gl o-s+ .yy 4 Z> a to R -,,t ItA w qq F' Yg a .n w A” 'LBw• E. -.--H- -- W O mama. C=. .. 2....�`' et x c� U C� '''t!''','" R 4.YL3 O m tl 4 W a S tH3.t Q 0 ➢-- 1,. 2x 4...A / CJ CQ i5 F� W .. a. m �` -.., 4tea i. 2 V. '' 1-.x G7 O.. \�.• #. I— a w u $ "-:moi �c w Packet Pg. 240 .. "' ... „„ i. .' k k ,:$ 'r _t c 9.C.f ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. o 2014-34, THE RMC-ENCLAVE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, THE v COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING 0 THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING 0 THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 12.17± ACRES OF LAND ZONED COMMUNITY FACILITY PLANNED UNIT N DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD) KNOWN AS THE GRACE ROMANIAN ti BAPTIST CHURCH OF NAPLES CFPUD TO THE RESIDENTIAL asm PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT c KNOWN ASTHE RMC-ENCLAVE RPUD; BY ADDING 48 E RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS FOR A TOTAL OF 162 1 0 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS OR BY ADDING 150 GROUP c HOUSING UNITS FOR A TOTAL OF 500 GROUP HOUSING UNITS; o BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN; BY REPEALING ORDINANCE c NO. 11-18, THE GRACE ROMANIAN BAPTIST CHURCH OF NAPLES c CFPUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF a LEARNING LANE AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, IN SECTION 13, w a) TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, > FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 40.55±ACRES. [PUDZ-PL20150001613] c Lu U 2 WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, Inc. and John ctct Passidomo, Esquire of Cheffy, Passidomo representing Enclave-Livingston, LLC, petitioned the C Board of County Commissioners to amend the RPUD and change the zoning classification of the c herein described property. o a> o NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY c COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: o SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. C. E The zoning classification of approximately 12.17± Acres of the herein described real t) property located in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida is Q changed from the Community Facility Planned Unit Development zoning district to a Residential t Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district, together with the existing RMC-Enclave RPUD, for an 40.55± acre parcel to be known as the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development in accordance with Exhibits A through F, attached hereto and incorporated by a reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. Q [15-CPS-01496]76 1 of 2 RMC-Enclave/PUDZ-PL20150001613 8/18/16 Packet Pg. 241 9.C.f 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Repeal of Ordinance 11-18 Ordinance 11-18, The Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples Community Facility a Planned Unit Development is hereby repealed. SECTION THREE: Effective Date. U This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Q m PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2016. ccT. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA c By: By: Deputy Clerk DONNA FIALA, Chairman U Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko (e\‘'" 00 Managing Assistant County Attorney o m U Attachment: Exhibit A—List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B —Development Standards Exhibit C—Master Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E— List of Deviations Exhibit F— List of Owner Commitments w m E U w Z:("' [15-CPS-014961 76 2 of 2 RMC-Enclave/PUDZ-PL20150001613 8/18/16 Packet Pg. 242 9.C.f EXHIBIT A FOR RMC- ENCLAVE RPUD Regulations for development of the RMC - Enclave RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of n. m this RPUD Document and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect o at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD L Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the c LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. U S PERMITTED USES: com c c A maximum development intensity of 114162 residential dwelling units, which equates to a c maximum of 4 du/ac, or 350500 units of group housing for seniors shall be permitted within the o RPUD. The FAR shall govern group housing units. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall lx be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: i 6 MIXED USE: c m D A. Principal Uses: a w d 1. Group housing for seniors including assisted living, continuing care retirement as communities, skilled nursing, memory care and independent living facilities at an w FAR of up to 9:60.55 (See Exhibit A Item C, Operational Requirements for Group Housing and Exhibit E, Deviation #1);or cc 2. Residential Dwelling Units a. Single Family Residential, including detached, attached, zero lot line, two family and duplex; 0 b. Townhouse; 070O c. Multi-family Residential; 3. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses as determined U by the Board of Zoning Appeals(BZA)or the hearing examiner. c co c =a L B. Accessory Uses: o 1. Garages and/or carports N 2. Guardhouses,gatehouses, and access control structures. E 3. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the developer and c developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access Q ways, parking areas, and related uses, subject to the procedures for a temporary use permit provided in the LDC. E 4. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences c and walls. Q 5. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with uses permitted in this RPUD, including recreational facilities, such as swimming pool, clubhouse, fitness center and maintenance facilities. Community-wide recreation facilities shall be Words underlined are additions;words s-triec-lf-14eug] are deletions RMC-Enclave RPUD 2015 Amendment Page 1 of 1105/31/ Packet Pg. 243 9.C.f required to provide a 15-foot wide buffer with 6-foot high wall where adjacent to the northern perimeter of the PUD. A minimum 30-foot setback for the structure shall be required from the northern PUD perimeter and from residential lots. 6. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses, consistent with the permitted uses for this RPUD, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the hearing examiner. C. Operational Requirements for Group Housing Group housing for seniors uses shall provide the following services and/or be subject to the Ti; following operational standards: 1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. 2. There shall be on-site dining for the residents. ce 3. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes c9 of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services may be provided for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to medical office visits. a. a cc 4. There shall be an on-site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents7.3 c with their individual needs. The manager/coordinator shall also be responsible for arranging trips to off-site events as well as planning for lectures, movies, music and other entertainment for the residents at the on-site clubhouse. 5. A wellness center shall be provided on-site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. 00 6. Each unit shall have the option to be equipped to notify the community staff in o the event of medical or other emergency. 7. Each unit shall be designed to accommodate residents with physical impairments (handicaps) as required by the applicable building codes and 0` federal law and regulation. PRESERVE CO A. Allowable Uses: _ 1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve area to be retained. 2. Mitigation areas. 3. Passive Recreation areas, as per LDC requirements. 4. Water management and water management structures, as per LDC requirements. Words underlined are additions;words s-tr eek-teugh are deletions RMC-Enclave RPUD 2015 Amendment Page 2 of 11 05/31/ Packet Pg.244 9.C.f DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibits B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. o=. Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth in Exhibit B, shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcels or lot boundary lines. Condominium and/or residential dwelling unit boundary s lines shall not be utilized for determining development standards. 0 ea co C cc E: 0 cc d v cc t.9". a C cc 0 n 0) m U C W 0 ce as 0 0 0 0 m U C cC C 0 I- 0 C d r U ca C N E V cc Words underlined are additions;words state--Fhi mgh are deletions I RMC-Enclave RPUD 2015 Amendment Page 3 of 11 05/31/ Packet Pg.245 9.C.f EXHIBIT B FOR RMC- ENCLAVE RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS n a- STANDARDS SINGLE SINGLE TOWNHOUSE TWO MULTI- GROUP s FAMILY FAMILYFAMILY& FAMILY HOUSING L DETACHED ZERO LOT DUPLEX LINE U 17) ,7,.=. fi M1! 410 t a fry i" , -a4R,I,r # " `K 4� f - .p S'," ?q ,,^'ttk--'M rf AW'd#-r, ++ xr f-i 4 �' 3n �'r J�-�3; 4w"�. i . �i,o Fi 0 y.' JY �",�7k 44 d �. �.E �.�� t :;�� ' Q PRINCIPALST'RlU LYRE, . ��, z w Fsa,. � i .,; x ., °'* m Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 1,600 SF 1,600 SF 10,000 SF N/A cca Minimum Lot Width 50 feet 40 feet 16 feet 16 feet 100 feet N/A cra Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet N/A N/A 0 Minimum Front Yard Setback') 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet a) Minimum Side Yard Setback 6 feet 0/6 feet(2) 0 feet 0 or 6 feet 15 feet 15 feet L Minimum Rear Yard Setback's) 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 20 feet 20 feet c Maximum Building Height c6 0 Zoned 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 40 feet 65 feet(3) a Actual 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 50 feet 75 feet ns Minimum Distance Between N/A 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 20 feet or 20 feet or Y2 c Structures Y2 BH BH W Minimum Floor Area 1,250 SF 1,250 SF 1,250 SF 1,250 SF 1,000 SF N/A E Minimum Preserve Setback 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 4 .Sl : . .r 9' . w . s . a 0) y, ^ > � ' g .t 1 4 � h tJ i P 4 , f u f' ` r �$ �1W COr to " r E* rin. ., 4 , its , g7z4 x t 5r Nr� N ACCESOR STiV RS '' u "w �Yw =V, e r ` . "Nt5 4.c 1• st 'rok !4 ^�,ot 0, (CMinimum Front Yard Setback(1) 0) 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 15 feet 15 feet 00 Minimum Side Yard Setback 5 feet 0 feet(2) 0 feet(2) 0 feet(2) 15 feet 15 feet c Minimum Rear Yard Setback's) 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 15 feet 15 feet m Minimum Preserve Setback 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet U cts Minimum Distance Between Structures 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet t Maximum Building Height T Zoned 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 35 feet 35 feet m Actual 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 45 feet 45 feet E BH: Building Height ca (I)Measured to edge of pavement or back of curb(single family front entry garages shall have 23' front setback). Q t�1 Must be at least 12 feet between structures. c (3)Any building exceeding a zoned height of 50 feet shall have a minimum setback of 50 feet from the PUD boundary and a E minimum setback of 200 feet from Livingston Road and Learning Lane. .e (4)Structures such as gate houses,walls and decorative architectural treatments shall have no setback from property line. as (5) Landscape Buffer Easements and/or Lake Maintenance Easements shall be located within open space tracts or lake tracts Q and not be within a platted residential lot. Where a home site is adjacent to a Landscape Buffer Easement or Lake Maintenance Easement within open space tracts or lake tracts,the accessory structure setback on the platted residential lot may be reduced to zero(0)feet where it abuts the easement. Words underlined are additions;words strrueic-through are deletions RMC-Enclave RPUD 2015 Amendment Page 4 of 11 05/31/ Packet Pg. 246 0. so 0 asLL'W` _CC kZcc zUwJ Jo .11 CO 0 Z Z Q� „a Ow= CC /.,. .41RI / 9.C.f e1- oZ ma I- I %' w10 t..) 5c o wa ~ a '% , xs w zww / ; w n �F N oz aaao / ;,. ;/ O ; 30 > za0c7 poa Nm�tY / ,; ' ,�� / g� z awU� Cf) wa3 %'% O o� 4z a n w�oz aa. <0< ww<`n ;%' 0 ' a.. `nW N QUw w=oo miow ��__\ �,(„ ZUn U t,1 D0 QX N �z2a to Gam F-1-m0 " / %/ c=1 (,.. Ci. up U O vmi N O " M j' /'" .a wU' O .-< z %'% /�� Z N toz v w ;i i•; > UgN = O 0 Z w 2 / • // i' 0 ' U mm 8 U +I a ,' /'" W w N N Q 0 a 0 +I +I ," / i a O u_0 o ' U N w z m I- w� a 0 0 w� o / ' / // i W '' t4 b Yo o �� w0 O //''' / ,�' Q V)W m / / i t6 W 0 Iw_' p Q Q 2 a i i 03 ^LL O't(j /' �/ I i i i/ S U Z z IC 0 5—xo • // I CZ _^ 8 Q0N Q OHO / '�j� '1.I i -�i/ LL • as 0. / —J u ay a- a) t W = =_ __-- :_-;1,I �,-i-- " coo 15 cc r� ter_' ��' a U' • N m z 112 ii i c4 w oo 0 zZ E€ �r 0 z §a DN OQ Ek cap 1 a z U" h N I- Z O tl of al 11.1 L. wrn e r w � O O Q Lu 2 k 2 E 00 w I W 0 • • o} e a 's € co I- C7 'u • Z J v ��- 0 J it I W Q".'.'• Ei Z a a I � W AL I- O U.bfl -w � Z f3, I o f • • u az aN a o Z 0 � � C Z I � 1 >- a s_ Cl, Dui I� ZO I f0 "sus9 S NN 7 II W Cl_ II �i8� i° 0 II 0 0 • 111' • • • • 1 I Li I. Q CJ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 7 tea^ lc p , 1.11. • • • • • • Ii N W0 -1 Q J h a=W Q W U0 > 0 c Up2w_.IN Z0 QD-a1-0 z 2 0 w W NN= 0N? Packet Pg. 247 9.C.f EXHIBIT D FOR RMC- ENCLAVE RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION a u_ .c A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: v BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5152, PAGE 2493, Q. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST m QUARTER OF SECTION 13 SOUTH 88°57'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,743.77 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER c OF (PARCEL 4) LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4878, PAGE 1799 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF 59 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LANDS AND THE EXTENSION THEREOF g NORTH 00°12'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,349.04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 89°02'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,117.58 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT AND ALSO BEING 6- A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF LIVINGSTON ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY c SOUTHERLY 383.80 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,014.86 FEET, A CENTRAL ca ANGLE OF 10°54'50", (CHORD BEARING SOUTH 10°35'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 383.22 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 73°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 32.50 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT; THENCE SOUTHERLY 454.51 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,047.36 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°43'10", (CHORD BEARING SOUTH 22°24'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 453.57 FEET); THENCE SOUTH v 00°09'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 201.77 FEET;THENCE NORTH 88°58'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 124.47 FEET TO A w POINT ON A NON TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 443.76 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF 6 SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,047.36 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°25'08", (CHORD BEARING SOUTH re 41°34'14" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 442.89 FEET)TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. rn CONTAINING 40.55 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. co (AS SURVEYED) A POR ' P . . _ • • • • FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF 'a THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, O FLORIDA; THENCE AEON ' • , ! - • e• - . . •_ • P • • - SAID SECTION S 88° 57' 15" • . • • ! ' . " TET e - ! - e• • • e . THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE c N H. • e • .R-QF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE ALONC •' • . :• • e - E QUARTER-, N 00 I =>5" , • • • • ., • _ • 9• •• • - . di • L SOUTHEAST QI-JAT2=FF.{{a HENCE--Y"EONG—T-4'-E • .. - • . • • • • :.o ' ' " A-DISTAN-CE OF-I--T-1-Ag FEET TO THE BE • • • • • • •. • • GENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A B CENTRAL ANG- ! , _ . • ! :- • • • • ! • • _ E _• • - • p *F TTI(' ; • • ! !- "P : _! • m OFFICIA- ' • !, • • ' _ ' • - . • - - • . - ' • • • DS FOR THE FOLLOWING Ti TREE(3)COURSES AND DISTANCES: co I. THENCE IN A WEST-2.• ! ' _ , - • ! _ - - , •N ARC DISTANCE OF 383.80 "- "-,_._ :AID CURVE; Words underlined are additions;words stetre/ reirg#are deletions RMC-Enclave RPUD 2015 Amendment Page 6 of 11 05/31/ Packet Pg. 248 9.C.f THE LEFT HAVING A CENT-RAI, ANGLE OF 08° 31' 3-8", A-RAD-I-F1S-OF 204-7.36 FEET, A CHORD BEARING AND r ■ r . •. - • ■ _ ! - . -, • r - - • • • ^. ! • DESCRIBED 1N OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOL{4544, P• ! • ! r_: r .• ! _ • , r •e LAND-S; THENCE RUN A6014G THE WEST LIN-F OF SAID-LANDS S 00° 10' 38" E,•A DISTANCE OF 673.88 FEET F r U .1 • • •A•r _ •r c PARCEL 2(WEST ONE HALF) THE WEST L2 OF THE EAST- I/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE U PARCEL II): 00151360000 as PA-RC:E L 3: THE NORTH 1 2-04L-T-4-1-E--SOUTHEAST 1'4 O r ru❑ Nno ruWEST 1.''4 e - !• , _ - r . .e. -, CL AND LESS A• ! - • • P. - r : -! •• - •- • : 2 THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST I/1 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF r4 •• e • SHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 25 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. rn PARCEL ID:001.48520002 as PARCEL 4: w 0 - • ! - • !' - ! ! as HE w1. • .• , • _ - - SP • •ru❑ uircr��2{)F "['}IE EAST 1/2 OF TILE - - - - _• • - - •TIIWEST 1/4 OF-SECTION r , r • , _ - • E,-- - • ' - r ! • E U c P-R L-1: C E THE NOR:1114-E^cam-'--1 4 OF THE SOUTH • - ' • •. _ . - e - v Words underlined are additions;words struck threeegh are deletions RMC-Enclave RPUD 2015 Amendment Page 7 of 11 05/31/ Packet Pg. 249 9.C.f COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OE SECTION 13,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST,COLLIER _ 2. _ . _• -_ - „ __ _ _! • INUTE-S 15 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH SOUTHEAST CORNER OE THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 36 • _ _ ! _ •• • , . .. _ - , _ , • . - _ - • , • • . _ SECTit • , e' • • _. • • . :e - • eRNER OF THE NORTHWEST B - e • . , e •• e - e, • e• .. a ! e• a.. ALONG THE • • • e.. - • •_ . . • P. •. • - •.. . i e' U FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST ;a' • ,' - , • e• - • . ,' e - • - • _ NARTI-IWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIED: THENCE RUN SOUT .. ! :' _ • • • . • a• SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWES-T N QUARTER ( - • ! •. • P. • . ' e -_ a • •e • e. • • _ THENCE R .• a ''. . - e - _. . _ •• ! E UN NORTH 73 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.50 FEET TO A • _ _ _ •• , NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2011.86 FEET, 3-8-3.19 FEET • • s .• P . .:•. • -. • .- s_ •. • .e• • • �! •. •. • . e. . . . • -• NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QL. • ' - ' - - - _ EAST QUARTER OF THE NORTIIW-ES-T + - • - • • - ' • e- , '• ` - ' SECONDS EAST. ALONG til THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST g QUART-' • • - ^ r • . • • -- - e _ • • • PARCEL 2(EAST ONE HALF): `* rn c.o THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 -OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/1 OF THE co PARCEL 5(EAST ONE HALF): a� U • e .- . . e_ - • e - - _ -!_ HEAST I/1 OF THE NORTHWEST 1!4 OF cmc .; •. • . • a - . • . .... a ' a- , ,e' a. L 0 c) E -. ci) E U w.. Words underlined are additions;words struck through are deletions RMC-Enclave RPUD 2015 Amendment Page 8 of 11 05/31/ Packet Pg. 250 9.C.f EXHIBIT E FOR RMC- ENCLAVE RPUD 0 LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS a u_ U 1. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1 which establishes a maximum FAR of 0.45 for group housing for seniors to permit a maximum FAR of 0.655. N CO CC U T. Rf ct a) Ca U 2 00 CO 'a 0 N CC + Qw a) v co Q Words underlined are additions;words sti_teek-thr'eargh are deletions RMC-Enclave RPUD 2015 Amendment Page 9 of 11 05/31/ Packet Pg.251 9.C.f EXHIBIT F FOR RMC- ENCLAVE RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS a. 1. UTILITIES The owner will provide a water stub-out at the northern boundary of the project in a location to i; be approved by the County at time of PPL or SDP, unless waived at that time by the County. y ti 2. ENVIRONMENTAL 0° a. The RPUD shall be required to preserve 25% of native vegetation, 28.0840.25± acres of native vegetation exists on-site requiring a minimum preservation of 7.0210.06± acres (28.0840.25 x .25 = 7.0210.06) of native vegetation to be retained. The preservation (11 plans shall meet or exceed the requirements of the LDC. b. A management plan for the project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to a gopher tortoises. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the 0 first phase of the project. co c 3. TRANSPORTATION v 2 The developer or its successors or assigns shall in good faith attempt to obtain secondary - - . - • - - .- - - - • - . :b. . . - - - . -- access to the Copier County School District. If access is granted by the Collier County School 00 with site development of the pioperty:The project's primary access will be on Livingston Road, a) which will be aligned with the North Collier Fire Department's Access as shown on the conceptual PUD Master Plan. '- -• . _ _ _ . . . -- _ •- .- .- • - E.= - ' - - -- - . „_ - . _• -- - • e J- r then the .-:jact x411 net h-Jv a s cend;ry ac: ss eP U.iving:ton field. If the .Icce.:. to Learn;n : : • - : • -- •:: _:- =, --- eA secondary right-in/out only access on Livingston Road may be approved by Collier County pending further evaluation by staff during SDP review. If a secondary access to Livingston is determined to be necessary, then it will be constructed as a right-in/out access at the approximate location shown on the conceptual PUD Master Plan. All site accesses and ingress turn lanes (if warranted) will be designed and constructed pursuant to the standards set forth by the LDC. Words underlined are additions;words st eelrthreugh are deletions RMC—Enclave RPUD 2015 Amendment Page 10 of 11 05/311 Packet Pg.252 9.C.f 4. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Enclave — Livingston LLC, 1055 Crosspointe Drive, Naples, Florida 34110. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity,then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released 0 of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts,the Managing Entity m shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its o responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no cc longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. CD 5. MISCELLANEOUS a. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the ce part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create > any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or w undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. U a cc b. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development LID 6. GENERAL This PUD may be developed as either group housing or residential dwelling units, but not both of these principal uses. =a L QCT t4 t4 Words underlined are additions;words etruele-tlweugh are deletions RMC—Enclave RPUD 2015 Amendment Page 11 of 11 05/31/ Packet Pg. 253 9.C.g 20D Wednesday,August 24,2016 Naples Daily News NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Q" tL U Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday,September 13th,2016,in - the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor, c.) Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the ,C enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence () at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: .� The purpose of the hearing is to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier CO County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2014-34, the RMC- Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development, and amending ca Ordinance No. 2004.41, the Collier County Land Development Code,by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by co changing the zoning classification of an additional 12.17±acres of land zoned Community Facility Planned Unit Development 0 (CFPUD)known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) m zoning district known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD; by adding 48 residential dwelling units for a total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding 150 group housing units for a total of 500 group housing units;by amending the master plan;by repealing -p Ordinance No. 11-18, the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD;and by providing an effective date. The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Learning Lane and Livingston Road,in Section 13,Township 48 South,Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 40.55±acres. [PUDZ- a PL20150001613] a) A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are f° invited to attend and be heard. W NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must C) register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item.The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. m c- Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, p written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall ov be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Boardra C a will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the m proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and v� evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation 'o in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, p) located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112- J 5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. c a� E BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA DONNA FIALA,CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK By: Ann Jennejohn Deputy Clerk(SEAL) August 24,2016 No.1228709 Packet Pg. 254