The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 03/24/1998 RREGULAR BCC MEETING OF MARCH 24, 1998 NapLes DaiLy Nevs NapLes, FL 33940 Affidavit of PubLication NapLes 0atLy Nears BOAR0 OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTN: NANCY SALOGUB PO 8OX &13016 0120 #013C[ OF NAPLES FL 34101-3016 MF_rTING NOTI~ O~ PUBLIC N~EETING BOARD Of= COUNTY CON~N~I$$1ONER$, REFERENCE: 001~0 800~&0 COLL~.R COUNTY, 57~22~7 NO?ICE OF PUBLIC HEE State of F~ortda that ~e County of ¢ol.L~er 6oord of County Co~ml~ sloners will meet In ~ Before the undersigned authority, personaLLy Boorcrs C~omt)ers on the appeared B. Lamb, vho on oath says that she serve~ Third FIo~r of line Admln- aS the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Haptes Is+rcdio~ Bulldln~ F) cd ~e Collier DaiLy Hews, a daily newspaper published at NapLes, Governmen! Complex, No, les, Florida, ~o cork in Cottter County, FLorida: that the attached duc~ ~he I~slness of C~. copy of advertising was published in said tier Cour~v,, c~ the s~c~ed ~me and newspaper on dates Listed. C~les of ~e o~endo Affiant further says that the said NapLes DaiLy f~ sold rr~,ettne wlll be News is a newspaper published at NapLes, in said trade available fo I~ess o~cl moy be ~- CoLLter Count),, FLortda, and that the said talned at me omce o~ me newspaper has heretofore been continuously County Administrator, some Ioca~on, some ~1. published in said CoLLier Count),, FLorida, each oda~fime. Any per~ who ~eck~ day and has been entered as second class eaiL es to ar~eal a ~ectslon carter at the post office in NapLes, in said th~s Boore w~# nee~ a re- CoLLier County, FLorida, for a period of 1 year cor~ o~ the ~rocee~ln~s pertaining the~etoo next preceding the first publication of the ~ere~ore may needto e~- sure tt~t a verlx~lm re- attached copy of advertisement; and affiant cord c~ me ~roceecang~ further says that she has neither paid nor mo~e, w~lcl~ record clu~es the te~rno~v and proa~sed any person, fire or coporation any evidence ~ wt~k:h ~e dtsc~nt, rebate, comisston or refund for the BOARD OFt COUNTY purpOse of securing this advertisement for COMMISSIONERS pubLication in the said newspaper. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORrDA BAR~3ARA B. BERRY, PUaL%SHE0 ON: 03/22 CHAIRAAAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BY:./s/lV~c~een Keny~ DeDu~, Clerk N~ch 22 I~. 1123365 Al) SPACE: 52.000 INCH FILED ON: 03/23/98 Signature of Affiant ' " Sworn to and Subscribed before me this ' day of *. '~ 19 /5' COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA Tuesday, March 24, 1998 9:00 a.m. NOTICE: ALL PFLRSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKRRS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY AD~INIS~TOR PRIOR TO ~7[E PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS Wq{ICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY A~MINISTRATOR AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASRD. ALL REGISTE~RD PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS PERMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAI~R~ ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SC"6RDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION - Pastor Michael Valentine, Gulf Shore Community Church 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Approved and/or adopted with changes 5/0 with the exception of Item 116B5 which is 4/0 (Co.'--kissioner Mac'Kie abstained) 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approved as Presented 5/0 A. March 3, 1998 - Regular meeting. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND SERVICE AWARDS A. PROCLAMATIONS Page 1 March 24, 1998 1) Proclamation proclaiming week of March 23 - 29, 1998 as Immokalee Friendship House Week. To be accepted by Ed Laudise, Executive Director and Gunnar Pederson, President of the Eoard of Directors. Adopted 5/0 B. SERVICE AWARDS Presented 1) Richard Hellriegel -OCPM - 5 years. C. PRESENTATIONS 1) A resolution suDporting prescribed burning pursuant to the "Florida Prescribed Burning Act," Section 590.026, Florida Statutes. Res. 98-78 - Adopted 5/0 6. APPROVAL OF CLERK'S REPORT A. ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO RESERVES FOR CONTINGENCIES. B. Present to the Board the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 1997. Presented C. Present the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 1996. Presented 7. PUBLIC PETITIONS 8. COUNTY AD~INI~TOR'S REPORT A. COMMUNITY DEVELO~ & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICF~ Moved from Item 916A3 1) Approval of a resolution that authorizes the County Administrator to apply for a $750,000 Economic Development Grant that is offered through the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Resolution 98-79 - Adopted 5/~ B. PUBLIC WORKS 1) Approve a Solid Waste Disposal Plan to provide cost effective waste disposal service that will meet Collier County's current and long range needs. Alternative 92 as outlined in the Executive S~ - Approved w/changes 3/2 (Co~issioners Mac'Kie and Berry opposed) Page 2 March 24, 1998 C. PUBLIC SERVICES D. SUPPORT SERVICES 1) Approval to present comparative cost information to the residents of the Isles of Capri Fire and Rescue District and the Ochopee Fire Control District. Presentation approved; Co...issioners to be advised of future meetings in order to attend- 5/0 E. COUNTY A~MINISTRATOR 1) Presentation of the County Administrator's Agency organization. County Administrator to move forward and come back to Board with further information - 5/0 F. AIRPORT AUT~ORI~ 9. COUNTY ATTORNEY' S REPORT 10. BOARD OF C(N3NTY COMMISSI~ A. Appointment of member to the Historical/Archaeological Preservation Board. Res. 98-80 ap~ointing Joanne Marro Quinn - Adopted 5/0 B. Appointment of member to the Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency. Res. 98-81 appointing W. }{erman Spooner - Adopted 5/0 C. Appointment of members to the Housing Finance Authority. Res. 98-82 appointing Thomas Palmer and reappointing John Conroy - Adopted 4/1 (Commissioner Constantine Added D. Additional Appointments to the ADG (Commissioner Berry) Res. 98-83 appointing Mike Taylor and Bob Roth - Adopted 5/0 Added E. Discussion regarding Sheriff's vehicles parking in Public Spaces (Commissioner Hancock) Staff to determine if Park Rangers can issue citations on the County Complex property. 11. A. CONSTITUTIOHAL OFFICERS B. PUBLIC COMMENT ON GENERAL TOPIC PUBLIC COMMENT ON GENERAL TOPICS March 24, 1998 PUBLIC I{EAR~S WILL BE HEARD ]iMMEDIATELY FOLfXYWING STAFF ITEMS 12. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS - BCC A. CO~/~D~NSIVE ~ AMENDMIVJ~.~ B. ZONING AMEN~TS 1) Petition PUD-~7-14(2), Alan D. Reynolds, AICP, of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., requesting an amendment to Ordinance 92-23, as amended, for the purpose of increasing the authorized gross floor area from 65,000 square feet to 72,000 square feet in the Wilson Professional Center PUD located on the southwest corner of Airport-Pulling Road and Bailey Lane in Sec. 23, T49S, R25E. Ordinance 98-21 - Adopted 5/0 2) Petition PUD-89-41(1), Bruce Tyson, AICP, representing Shoppes at Santa Barbara, Inc., requesting an amendment to The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD to remove fraternal and social clubs, self-service laundries, nightclubs, and private clubs as permitted uses and to amend car washes to be permitted as enclosed only; to prohibit repair services as part of the permitted use of service stations for property located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard, located in Sec. 4, T50S, R26E. Ordinance 98-22 - Adopted 5/0 3) Petition R-97-12, Shane and Cindy McIntosh requesting a rezone from "RSF-4" to "C-l' for property on the west 30 feet of Lots 16 and 21, all of Lots 17 and 20, and the east 20 feet of Lots 18 and 19, Gordon River Homes in Sec. 34, T49S, R25E. Ordinance 98-23 - Adopted 5/0 4) CONTINUED TO THE M~ING OF APRIL 14~ 199P - Petition Community Development and Environmental Services Divisicn representing the Collier County Board of County Commissioners requesting a rezone from "PUD" Planned Unit Development to Rural Agricultural for the Neapolitan Park PUD located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard in Sec. 4, T50S, R26E. Continued to April 14, 1998 5) CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF MARCH 10, 199P - Petition PUD-g7- 31(3), Timothy W. Ferguson and Dominic Gadaleta representing SJG Land Trust requesting a rezone from "PUD" to "PUD' for the planned unit development known as Gadaleta amending the Gadaleta PUD in response to requirements of Section 2.7.3.4 of the LDC, Resolution 97-134, for property located on the west side of Old Tamiami Trail North/Old U.S. 41 North (C.R. 867) and immediately contiguous the Lee County boundary line in Sec. Page 4 March 24, 1998 10, T48S, R26E. Table4 for two weeks - 5/0 6) CONTI~ FROM THEI~TI'INGOFMARC}! 177 199~ - Petition PUD-97- 18, Karen Bishop of Project Management Services, Inc., representing Signature Communities, Inc., requesting a rezone from RMF-6, RMF-12(6) and RMF-12ST(6) to PUD to be known as The Dunes Planned Unit Development for a maximum of 531 multi- family dwelling units, located on the northwest corner of iiith Avenue North and Vanderbilt Drive, further described as Lots 1- 10, Block 1, all of Block 2, and lots 1-16, Block 3, Wiggins Pass Landings Unit 1, and Lots 1-4, Block 1, Wiggins Pass Landings Unit ~1Addn., in Sec. 30, T48S, R25E. Ord. 98-24 ;%do~)te~ w/additional stipulations - 5/0 C. OT~IF~ I) Ordinance amending Collier County Ordinance No. 72-I, as amended, which created the Collier County Lighting District by removing Foxfire Units 1 & 3 from the Collier County Lighting District. (Companion Item to Petition AV 97-028, Vacation of Platted Rights-of-Way in Foxfire Units One, Two and Three.) Denied 3/0 (Coh~issioners Norris and Constantine out) 2) Petition AV 97-028 to renounce and disclaim all rights and interests of the County and Public to access (ingress/egress) and travel upon the following roadways located within Foxfire Subdivision and Planned [/nit Development; those roadways depicted and described in the plat of Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, Pages 84 through 86, and Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, Pages 101 through 103, Public Records of Collier County, Florida: providing for the continuing and unaffected rights of Easement Holders, Emergency Medical and Fire Services, Collier County Water Management Vehicles and Personnel, Collier County Transportation Vehicles, Personnel and Permitting, and Collier County Water-Sewer District Vehicles and Personnel; providing an effective date. (Companion item to County-wide Street Lighting District Ordinance Amendment.) Denied 2/3 (Con~nissioners Mac'Kie, Norris, and Berry opposed) 3) Petition AY 98-003 to vacate a portion of a 7.5' wide Utility Easement along the Easterly 7.5' of Lot 11, Block 69, according to the Plat of "Naples Park Unit 5", as Recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 14, Public Records of Collier County, Florida Res. 98-85 - Adopted 5/0 ' 4) Petition CCSL-97-5, Brett D. Moore, P.E., of Humiston & Moore Engineers, representing Richard G. and Neona L. Cole requesting a Coastal Construction Setback Line Variance to allow for the reconstruction of an existing residence located at Lot 32, Block A, replat of Unit 1, Conner's Vanderbilt Beach Estates in Page 5 March 24, 1998 Sec. 29, T48S, R25E. Res. 98-87 - Adopted 4/0 (Comissioner Berry out) 5) Petition SNR-98-1, Lely Barefoot Beach Property ~ners Association requesting a street name change from Lely Beach Boulevard to Barefoot Beach Boulevard located in Lely Barefoot Beach Subdivision further described as Secs. 5 6 7 ~ and 13 T48S, R25E. ' ' ' ' Res. 98-88 - Adopted 4/0 (Commissioner Berry out) 6) Petition AV 96-001 to vacate the Plats of Wiggins Pass Landing Unit No. 1 as Recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 44, and Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1 Addition as Recorded in Plat Book Page 81, all of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Res. 98-84 Adopted - 5/0 7) Adopt the Proposed Collier County Water Irrigation Ordinance. Failed - 2/2 (Co~issioner Norris and Constantine opposed and Co~issioner Berry out) Continued for two weeks and Staff to bring back educational proposal - Failed 2/2 (Co~nissioner Norris and Constantine opposed) Staff to work on educational proposal to be included in mailers 4/0 (Co~issioner Berry out) 13. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A. AUVERTI~ PUBLIC HF2iRI~ 1) Petition V-97-18, Robert L. Duane of Hole, Montes & Associates. representing Kraft Construction Company requesting a 3.5 foot · ;ariance from the Industrial Zoning District side yard setback requirement of 13.5 feet on both the east and west side yards for property located on the south side of South Horseshoe Court in Sec. 35, T49S, R25E. Res. 98-89 - Adopted 4/0 (Co~issioner Berry 2) Petition CU-92-16A, Community Development and Environmental Services Division representing the Collier County Environmental Advisory Board requesting an amendment to Resolution 93-129 by removing Condition "C" which requires a bird survey as a condition of the operation of Everglades Private Airboat Tours on 1,016 acres in Secs. 26 and 27, T52S, R29E. Res. 98-86 - Adopted 5/0 B. OTHER 14. STAFF'S COMMUNICATIONS 1. Allegations of the Isle of Capri Board Members (Leo Ochs) Advisory Board to discuss by-laws at their meeting Page 6 March 24, 1998 15. BOARD OF COUNTY CC~MISSZONERS' COMMUNICATIONS 16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. Approved and/or Adopted with changes - 5/0 A. COMMUNITY DEVELO~ & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICF-g 1) Authorize staff to submit a grant proposal to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for funding sea turtle public awareness activities. 2) Authorize staff to submit a grant proposal to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for funding exotics removal in the Lely Barefoot Conservation Easement. Moved to Item ~8A1 3) Approval of a resolution that authorizes the County Administrator to apply for a $750,000 Economic Development Grant that is offered through the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Withdrawn 4) Final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of Sapphire Lakes Unit 1. 5) Approval for recording the final plat of "Kensington Park Phase Three-C" Subject to cash bond, Construction and Maintenance Agreement and stipulations as detailed in the Executive Su~m~ary 6) Approval for recording the final plat of Avila Unit One. Subject to Letter of Credit, Construction and Maintenance Agreement and stipulations as detailed in the Executive S~mmary 7) COW£INUED FROM THE MEETING OF MARCH 17, 1998 - Approval for recording the final plat of "Glen Eden, Phase One". Subject to Construction, Maintenance and Escrow Agre~nt and stipulations as detailed in the Executive Summary B. PUBLIC WORKS 1) To accept the highest and best bid for the purchase of a portion of the Marco Island Transfer Station. Bid in the ~unt of $130,000.00 accepted from David P. l{opstetter, Trustee; Staff to prepare the Real Estate Sales Agreement and other appropriate documents for the closing of Page 7 Narch 24, 1998 the transaction 2) Recognize, approve and appropriate a portion of the Marco Island Beautification M.S.T.U. Fund 131 Carry Forward and Reserves for Landscape Maintenance Expenses. As detailed in the Executive Su,~,ary 3) Approval of Bid 98-2781 for the purchase and delivery of one Tractor with Slope Mower for the North County Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. A~arded to Creel Ford Tractor Co. in the amount of $72,950.00 4) Approve a Change Order to Work Order No. ~BP FT-96-7 with Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. for Additional Survey and Mapping for the Widening of Golden Gate Boulevard Project No. 63041, CIE ~62. In the amount of $38,140.00 5) Approve a Waiver of Road and EMS Impact Fees for the Naples Art Association and the Naples Players. (Co~issioner Mac'Kie abstained) 6) Award Work Order P~BP-FT-98-5 to Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. and Work Order BSW-FT-98-4 to Barany, Schmitt, Weaver and Partners, Inc. for Design Services related to the Golden Gate Fitness Center, Project No. 80114. Work Order to Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek in the amount of $30,700.00; Work Order to Barany, Schmitt, Weaver & Partners in the amount of $32,200.00 7) Approve Change Order No. 2 to Mitchell & Stark Construction Company, Inc. for the Reclaimed Water Transmission Main from Quail Creek to the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant, Phase II, Contract No. 97-2674, Project No. 74008. In the amount of $44,738.47 8) Award Bid #97-2750 for Backflow Prevention Assemblies and Associated Materials. Ferguson Underground as primar~ vendor and Hughes Supply as the secondary vendor 9) Approve Supplemental Agreement No. 4 with CH2M Hill for the Pine Ridge Road Improvement, Project No. 60111; CIE 41. In the amount of $191,065.00 C. PUBLIC SERVI~ 1) Approve a resolution appointing officers to Collier County Agriculture Fair and Exposition, Inc., Board of Directors. Res. 98-76, appointing ?erryWolfson, President; Hank Douglas, Vice-President; Pat Cookson, Secretary; John ¥onkosky, Page 8 March 24, 1998 Treasurer; JfmMansberger, Security; Taylor Baker, Education; DuaneWheeler, Civic, Ken Cuyler, Attorney; and~an~byRiner, Agriculture D. SUPPORT SERVICES 1) Approval to reimburse the Facilities Management Department for an emergency expenditure for the Tax Collector's uninterrupted power supply system. In the amount of $13,883.00 2) Approval of a grievance procedure fulfilling the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Res. 98-77 3) This item has been deleted. 4) Appropriate additional funds for contractual fire suppression services provided by the Division of Forestry. Budget Amendment in the amount of $4,563.00 5) Approve Ochopee Fire Control District grant request. To purchase co~unications ecIuipment and the leasing of pagers in an amount not to exceed $8,000.00 6) Recommendation to reject all proposals received under RFP 97-2767. Staff to re-solicit proposals for the acquisition of Mail Center Egui~ment E. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1) Budget Amen~nt Re~ort Budget Amendments 98-160 and 98-172 F. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS G. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 1) MISC~LI.%~3~S ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTRD. H. ~ CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 1) Recommendation that the BCC sign the certification of acceptance and the signatory authority letter for the subgrant award of the State of Florida Stop Violence Against Women Grants Program. I. COUNTY ATTORNEY J. AIRPORT AUTHORITY lqa~¢h 24, 1998 IN~R~RIESC0~CI~I~FXI~~TOTHEBOARD'SAGENDASHOULDBEMADE~O THE C0~-~,'fAI~~'rKA~R'S O~PIC~ AT 774-8383. Page 10 AGENDA CHANGE,~ BOARD OF COUNTY CQMML~;IONER.~' MEETING AL4RCH 24. 1998 ADD: ITEM lO(D) - ADDITIONAL APPOINTMENTS TO THE ADG (COMMISSIONER BERRY). MOVE: rr~M lt(A)O) TO S(AKt) . RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COV~'rr ADMINISTRATOR TO APPLY FOR A STSO, OOO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT (DCA) (STAFF'S RE ~2 uESr~. WITiiDIL4W: ITEM 16(A)(4). FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR FINAL PLAT OF u~4PPHIRE LAKES UNIT 1" (STAFF'S REQUESt. NOTE: ITEM 12(C)(~) SHOULD BE HEARD BEFORE ITEM 12(C )(i) - AV-97-028- PRIVATIZATION OF ROADS WITHIN THE FOXFIRE SUBDIVISION. (STAFF'S STAFF COMMUNICATION$ 1. ALLEGATIONS OF THE ISLE OF CAPRI BOARD MEMBER~ 5 A 1 ~¥HEREAS, lmmokalee Friendship House was founded In 1987 and continues to provide around the clock service to the people of Collier County; and WIIEREAS, the Immokalee Friendship llouse provides emergency relief for the hungry and homeless of Collier County and annually provides shelter for more than 1,000 homeless and serves 25.000 meals; and H/HERE, dS, the Immokalee Friendship House provides a home for many services of value to the lmmokalee area and to Collier County in general, including meeting sites for ,4,4, battered women ~ groups, tutoring programs, job fairs and community service college spring break.~; and WtlERE/IS, the Immokalee Friendship llouse sponsors Innovative programs and refers clients to programs for health, job placement and education; and WHEREAS, the Immokalee Friendship House program recently recetved the prestigious "Harry Chapin Self-Reliance ,4 ward for getting the unemployed back to work, The lmmokalee Friendship tlousg is the only homeless shelter in the U.S. to receive this distinction; and WIIEREAS, the lmmokalee Friendship House has the support of,an exceptional Board of Trustees, a dedicated group tff volunteec.¢ and tm especially able staff. NOW THEREFORe, be tt proclaimed by the Board of Courtty Co~lt~toners of Collier County, Florida. that the week of March 23 - 29, 1998 be designated as a~d ur~ all citY, ear to ~i$1l ~he lmmokalee Friendship ttou. ve at ~02 W. Main Street in ~mmokales ~o observe the fine work they do.. and ~o ~UpPort their work az vohOtteers and as contributors. ~' :~ .,i ', DONE,4ND ORDER I~IIS 24th Day of March, 1998, ~' ....... · BO~4RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNT~, FLORIDa4 DIVIG~ E. BROCK. CL~,R~ March 26, 1998 Mr. Bob Crawford, Commissioner Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32399-0800 Dear Commissioner Crawford: Enclosed please find a copy of Resolution 98-78, Supporting Prescribed Burning, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County on March 24, 1998. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman Deputy Clerk /ejh Enclosure I I Hill iii ii I April 2, 1998 Ms. Ellie Hoffman Counly of Collier 3301 Tamiami Trail East Ndpleq, Floridd 34101-.}044 Dear Ms. Hoffman: Thank you for a copy of Collier County's Resolution 98-78, Supporting Prescribed Burning. We are very grateful for your counl¥'s support Io this valuable program. It' w~, ('an be of service,, plea~, (*onfac'l us. Sincerely, . ~ BOB CRAWFORD v COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE BC/we Frt~ l; J ,~ r i ,l xt A g r i ~. t. I I [, r ,. xt ,I ,! i",~ r~.s I i~ ro,l ,; ,. t ~ RESOI,UTION NO. 98- 78 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PRESCRIBED BURNING PURSUANT TO THE "FLORIDA PRESCRIBED BURNING ACT," SECTION 590.026, FI,ORIDA STATUTES. WHEREAS, prescribed burning is a critical resource management tool that when properly administered minimizes impacts on air quality, protects public safety, and enriches property aesthetics; and WHEREAS, prescribed burning reduces accumulated fuels and consequently lessens the likelihood and severity of uncontrolled and damaging wildfires; and WHEREAS, much of the ecosystem of Collier County, including endangered, threatened, and species of special concern, is fire-dependent for its vitality; and WHEREAS, the Florida Legislature enacted Section 590.026, Florida Statutes. the "Florida Prescribed Burning Act," that recognized the benefits of conducting prescribed burning; and WHEREAS. niles governing open burning in Collier County require that proper authorization be obtained from the Florida Division of Forestry, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. prior to conducting prescribed burning in Collier County. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that the Board, in regular session and duly assembled, supports Ihe use of prescribed burning as a land management tool in Collier County. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED:. ;; ..... , ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA Approved as to form and ' · ': ',., ,: :,~,. legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel County Attorney DCW~kn re. v~ Thc ph,logtaph used on thc cover was provided by Clyde llulchcr ('lydc Butchc~ ,s a graduate m archflccturc from thc I 'nlvcrslty of('alifomia Polytcchmc at San Ob~spo. Ihs mlcrcsl~ m spal~al relatmnsh~ps and prcscn~atmn of architectural designs lcd hm~ rolo thc field ~t' photography. From these earl)' fo~al interests, he became attracted ,o thc landscape. Mr. Butcher has been a fine a, photographer Ibr over 30 years ami today thc majomy ofh~s ~ork ~s of Florida. lie uses an g" x lO" amt a 12" x 20" view camera which enables him lo get thc elaborate dctad and texlurcs that distinguish the rapidly disappearing landscape of Florida. llis hope is Ihat through thc photographic rccogmlmn of the natural beauW of Florida. undeveloped areas of thc stale ~vdl be prcscrx cd. l'ubhc Broadcasting has completed a ', hour d~'umcntaD' on ('lyde. I~StE~?r~Iq. xvh~ch won Iht IOq3 Best Amstic DocumentaD' award f?om thc prest~gmus I.oms Wol~gon Il Metha lhstory ('enter lhlm and V;deo. M~ami Beach. Florula A second video. Big (3~n'a'.~ Pr,'sen'c' thc &',','l t,l thc ~crghtth'.~. featuring Clyde won the 1094 award for Beat A~lsllc Expression t?om lhe I.oms Wolfson I1 Med~a lhslo~ Ccnlcr of Film and Video. Miam~ Beach. Florida A lhrcc pa~ Large )~,rmat (~l,lt'rtt ll3r~,ht,p v~deo has al~o ~cn complclcd and made available ~o thc public. In addmon. Clyde ha~ been honored by (;ovemor I.awmn (3~les w~h lhe "lh.artlamf' community se~'ice award. A large selection of Clyde's work can be fimnd al his galle~, lhg ('~rcss Galle~. l~aled in ~c Everglades on Tamianu Trail in the Big C~ress Nallonai Prese~e. tlis home and galle~ are l~ated i 3 acres in lhe middle of more lhan a million acres of Nalional Park. sunounded by the wellands and C~rcss hammocks of wild Florida. We would like to express our smccrc gralmulc ~o Mr. Butcher for allo~'ing us thc usc of this photo. m COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED m SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 m COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA m BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN m BARBARA B. BERRY TIMOTHY J. CONSTANTINE PAMELA S. MAC'KIE JOHN C. NORRIS I COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR m ROBERT F. FERNANDEZ ! CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER m DWIGHT E. BROCK i DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING JAMES L. MITCHELL, CIA, CFE, CBA m Prepared by the Finance and Accounting Department COUNTY ATTORNEY EXTERNAL AUDITORS DAVID C. WEIGEL ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT i TIMOTHY HANCOCK B :=:: , Ei!?:o.:i.;E.. ..... __ ~A ~D WEIGEL II ~ D~GHT BROCK ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY t COUNTY ADMINISTRATO~ I ADMINIST~TOR BUDGET ~KE SMYKO~KI ADMINISTRATOR DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR ADMINIST~TOR SERmCES LEO OCHS. JR. , ~NCE CAUTERO [ TOM OLLIFF L Real Pro~ Manlge~nt Building R~i~ and PermHtmg M~e~ Capital Facilities Management C~o Enforcement V~erlfll 8~ll Solid Waste Rlvlfl~ ~l~JCll Ho~i~ I~ Urban Development M~JuI Exlmi~r ~t~m Wltff information Tlchnol~y Natural Relates Agrtcu~wl Trlnl~/tio~ Emergency Sewices Planning Services D~stlc Afl~ll Sewlces WISIt Wit~ Risk Mlnigtmlnt PoIl~Jon Conlrol SKill S~lCll Human Semites Llbrl~ Purchasing Plrkl I~ J TABL~ OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTORY SECTION Transmi~l Le~er Page Cedifi~te of Achievement ........................................................................................................................................................... Xll FINANCIAL SECTION m Re~ of Independent Ce~ified Public Ac~untants COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (OVERVIEW) GENE~L PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: m ~mbined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types, Ac~unt Groups and Discretely Presented ~m~nenl Units ~mbined Statement Of Revenues. Ex~;Jlij;jS a;'J ~;;ges ;; ~'nd Balances- 2 All Governmental Fund Ty~s. Expendable Trusl Funds and Discretely Presented ~m~nent Units ~mbined Statement of Revenues, Expe~Ji~jFj; a~o' ~g;s 8 m in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual (Budgeta~ Basis) m All Governmental Fund Ty~s and Expendable Trust Funds ~mbined Stalement of Revenues, Ex~nses and Changes .................................................................................................... 10 in Re~ined Earnings - All Propdeta~ Fund Types m ~mbined S,atemen, of Cash F,ows- A,, Propde.~'~j~j'~j;; .............................................................................................. m Notes to The General Pu~se Financial Statements .................................................................................................................. 16 AND ACCOUNT GROUP STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND GOVERNUENTAL FUND ~PES: General Fund m Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances. Budget and Aclual Special Revenue Funds ~mbining Balance Sheet ~mbining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures ............................. m and Changes in Fund Balances 57 Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures .................................... and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual (Budgeta~ Basis) .................................................................................. 60 m m Debt Se~ice Funds ~mbining Balance Sheet ~mbining Statement of RevJnues, Expenditures ......................................................... 68 m and Changes in Fund Balances 70 m ~mbining S~tement of Revenues, Expenditures .................................. and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual (G~P Budgeta~ Basis) ....................................................................... 72 m ~apital Projects Funds m ~mbining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenues, Ex~ndltures ................................................................................................................. 79 m and Changes in Fund Balances m ~mbining Schedule of Revenues, Ex~nd~tures ' ' m and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual (Budgeta~ Basis) .................................................................................. 83 4 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6r J~ COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 1997 30, TABLE OF CONTENTS - CONTINUED PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES: Enterprise Funds Page Combining Balance Sheet Combi.ing Statement of ............................................................................................................................ 89 and Changes in Retained Earnings ........................................................................................................................................ 93 Combining Schedule elr Revenues. Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings - Budget and Actual (Budgetary Basis) 95 Combining Statement of Cash Flows ................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Internal Service Funds Combining Balance Sheet ....................................................................................................................................................... !03 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings Combining Schedule of Revenues, E;~[~[ ....................................... 105 and Changes in Retained Earnings. Budget and Actual (Budgetary Basis) .............................................................................................. 107 Combining Statement of Cash Flows ........................................................................................................................................ 110 FIDUCIARY FUNDS AND ACCOUNT GROUPS: Expendable Trust and A~ency Funds CombinIng Balance Sheet - All Fiduciary Funds ........................................................................................................................ 114 Combining Statement of Revenues. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - All Expendable Trust Funds ............................................................................................... 117 Combining Schedule of Revenues. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual (Budgetary Basis) - All Expendable Trust Funds Combining Statement of ............................................................................................................................ and Liabilities . All Agency Funds ........................................................................................................................................... 124 .Account Groups and Schedules Schedule of General Fixed Assets by Classification and Source Schedule of d~l~'~'l' 'l~'i'~l' '~:~ ~'~'i~' '1~' 'l~'~'~'ii~'~ ......................................................................................................................... 127 and Classification Schedule of Chang~'i~'~i'~i~'~'~'~; .................................................................................................................... '~28 Function .................................................................................................................................................................................. 129 Schedule of General Long-Term Debt 130 Schedule Changes Genera STATISTICAL SECTION General Governmental Revenues by Source ............................................................................................................. 133 General Governmental Expenditures by Function ..... 134 Property Tax Levies and Collections .................................................................................................................... Assessed and Estimated Actual Valu~'~i'~'~i~'~'~:~l~ ...................................................................................................... !35 .................................................................................................... ~36 Property Tax Rates. All Direct and Overlapping Governments ............................................................................................... 137 Special Assessment Billings and Collections ............................................................................................................................. 138 Computation of Legal Debt Margin 139 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt ................................................................................ 139 Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assess~ ........................................................................................................................ Values and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita .......................................................... 140 Ratio of Annual Debt Serv ce Expenditures for ..................... General Bonded Debt to Total General Governmental Expenditures ................................................................................... 141 Schedule of Water and Sewer Funds Revenue Bond Coverage ............................................................................................. 142 Salades and Surety Bonds of Principal Officials 143 Demographic Statistics ........................................................................................................................................... 144 Property Value Construction and Bank Deposits 145 Principal Taxpayers County Wide Miscellaneous Statistical Data ............................................................................................................................................. 146 Major Industries Within Collier'~.~ ........................................................................................................................................ 147 Schedule of Insurance In Force ....................................................................................................................................... 148 ................................................................................................................................................. 149 · County of Collier __~- .~ CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ,~ ;v .., COLLIE~ COUNI~' COURTHOUSE PO BOX 413044 NAPLES FLORIDA 33041-3044 CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER · ., ,.,L.uW~s.~ E. Brock CLEgK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I March 3, 1998 I To the Citizens of Collier County: It is with extreme pleasure that we present to you, the citizens of Collier County, the I Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ('CAFR") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997. The County's Finance and Accounting Department, which reports to the Clerk of the Circuit Court. prepared this report. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the presented data and the I completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the Clerk of the Circuit Court as Chief Financial Officer of Collier County. We believe the data, as presented. ,s accurate in all material respects, that it is presented in a manner designed to fairly set fcrth the i financial position and results of operations of the County as measured by the financial activity of its various funds and account groups, and that all disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain the maximum understanding of the County's financial activity have been included. I The CAFR consists of three parts: Introductory Section, which includes this letter of transmittal, the County's organizational chart with I a list of principal officials, and the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the year ended September 30, 1996. IFinancial Section, which includes the general purpose financial statements, the combined, individual fund and account group financial statements and schedules, as well as the independent certified public accountant's report on the general purpose financial statements, i Statistical Section, which includes a number of tables of unaudited data depicting the financial history of the County for the past ten years, demographics and other miscellaneous information. I REPORTING ENTITY i In 1922. Barron Gift Collier purchased the 2,026 sq~.'are miles of land on the southwest coast of Florida that today is known as Collier County. Barron Collier recognized the need for infrastructure to bring about economic development to the region. At a cost of more than one million dollars, he funded the construction of the Tamiami Trail connecting Tampa and Naples to I Miami, Shortly after the completion of the Tamiami Trail in 1928, train service came to Naples, and with it, another vital link to economic development. I Today, Collier County is home to approximately 202,900 resider,ts and continues to be ranked as one of the fastest growing metropolitan areas in the United States. In 25 years, the permanent population has increased by approximately 83 percent. Between 1980 and 1997, the average I annual population growth rate was 5 percent. This growth rate is expected to continue well into _! I the 21st century. The population is expected to reach 382,400 by the year 2020, at which time the seasonal population is projected to exceed 500,000. I Collier County is a non-charter county established under the constitution and the laws of the State · of Florida. The County provides a full range of services for its citizens. These services include, but are not limited to, law enforcement, human and community assistance, civil and criminal justice services, the construction and maintenance of roads and bridges, streets and infrastructure, recreational and cultural activities, sanitation services and water and sewer services. The primary government consists of six elected offices; the Board of County Commissioners, I which is composed of five members, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Property Appraiser, the Sheriff, the Supervisor of Elections and the Tax Collector. The Board of County Commissioners is the legislative body for Collier County, and as such, budgets and provides all the funding used by I the various County departments and the separate Constitutional Officers with the exception of fees I collected by the Clerk of the Circuit Court and the Tax Collector. Under the direction of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Finance and Accounting Department maintains the accounting system for the County's operations, including the Supervisor of Elections. The Clerk of the Circuit Court. I Property Appraiser, Sheriff and Tax Collector maintain their own accounting systems. However. for purposes of the CAFR, the operations of the County as a whole, including all of the Constitutional Officers, have been presented. I ECONOMIC CONDITION AND OUTLOOK Collier County is located in the southwestern portion of the State of Florida, with Naples being its largest incorporated municipality. The County has made impressive economic strides since the completion of the Tamiami Trail in 1928. The State of Florida certified Collier County as a "Blue I Chip Community" in 1985. To obtain this certification, a county must meet state requirements in important areas of economic development including the creation of plans for growth management and comprehensive land use. With over two thousand square miles, Collier County is the largest I county in Florida and the second largest county east of the Mississippi River. A portion of the County lies within lhe boundaries of the Everglades National Park, the United States' only subtropical national park. I · The County derives its economic strength primarily from service, retail, agriculture and construction industries. All industrial sectors have achieved substantial growth since the early 70's. Aggregate earnings increased from approximately $374 million in 1970 to $2 billion last year. Historically, employment within the County has varied significantly throughout the year due to the I influx of tourists and seasonal residents during the winter months coupled with seasonality in the agricultural industry. The average number of individuals in the labor force fluctuated from a high of 91,995 in December 1996 to a Iow of 73,911 in July. I During 1997, there were 2,508 new jobs created in the retail industry, a growth rate of 13 percent. Growth in retail shopping will continue as a result of the continuing development in North Naples. · Recent new retail stores include Sports Authority, Toys 'R Us and Steinmart. Additionally. Lowe's · will open a large home improvement center during 1998. Also, established specialty shops ar:d boutiques continue to target the expanding tourist market. The retail trade provides 26 percent of I wages and salary jobs in the County. Retail workers experienced average annual earnings of $16,600 during 1996. I I! ! The service sector employs 32 percent of the wage and salary workforce with an annual average wage of $26,900. Growth in this sector also remains strong with 1,605 new jobs and a growth rate of 6 percent. Services include hotels, restaurants, entertainment, education, health, legal and professionals. Health care services alone provide over 7,500 jobs to the area with average annual earnings exceeding $36,000 during 1996. Finance, insurance and real estate account for 6 percent of the wage and salary work force in Collier County. During 1997, financial services and real estate provided 4,730 jobs and generated 9 percent of all wages earned. Average earnings were approximately $38,300. County is one of the largest agricultural producers in the United States. The agricultural Collier industry represents 12% of the work force. Farming activities are located approximately forty miles inland and are primarily centered around the community of Immokalee. Major crops include tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers and melons, as well as the citrus crops. Beef cattle are also a significant farming commodity. During 1997, employment also increased in the construction industry as population fuels growth the demand for new homes. There were 2,092 new homes constructed in 1996 and 2,601 new multifamily units. The average price for new single family homes was $233,203 and multifamily units average $233,625. The total value of all construction permitted during fiscal year 1997 was $728,721,600, which is an increase of $105,113,500 over fiscal year 1996. Construction firms located in Collier County provided 8,938 jobs, an increase of 1,721 jobs equating to an annual growth rate of 13 percent. The construction industry generated 11 percent of all wages earned. Average income in this sector was $27,100. Construction employees represent 11 percent of the work force. Government is the other major employer in the area and represents 10 percent of total jobs. Approximately 3,650 individuals are employed by the Collier County School Board and over 2.300 are employed by the County and its Constitutional Officers. Manufacturing, wholesale trade, communications and public utilities round the remaining 9 percent of the labor force. In summary, Collier County's excellent financial base, strong infrastructure, proximity to world class ports, and Iow taxes create an attractive environment in which to live and work. Money Magazines' 1995 annual survey rated Naples as one of the top ten most desirable places to live in the United States. Among the magazines' findings were that in the last 12 months, housing appreciation was the second highest in the country while property taxes are among the lowest in the state. Future job growth is projected to remain very strong and all economic indicators point to a promising future for Collier County. MAJOR INITIATIVES During fiscal year 1997 the County continued its commitment to streamline operations to become more efficient while improving services to the community. The County's more significant accomplishments were: The Vanderbilt Beach Road four-lane connection from Hammock Road Drive to Airport Pulling Road provides the final east-west link for connecting traffic from County Road 951 to the Gulf of Mexico. Construction on this 2.4-mile section started in December of 1995 and opened for traffic in May of 1997. The scope of work on this $8.5 million dollar project included water and sewer extension facilities, median landscaping and noise abatement walls. iii · One neighborhood wastewater treatment facility and two regional wastewater treatment facilities, currently totaling 17.5 million gallons of daily capacity, are operated and maintained by the County. The North County Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility is under design for expansion for an additional 5 million gallons per day, which will result in the phasing out of the facility currently serving the Pelican Bay area. Extensive modifications are underway at the South County Regional Facility. Improvements include relocation of major components, construction of a deep injection well, and 100 acres of new effluent storage ponds. · Emergency Services upgraded its fleet of advanced life support ambulances with the addition of five new medium duty vehicles. The safer, more advanced paramedic vehicles are designed to handle a wide spectrum of medical/rescue emergency situations. · Human Resources recently improved the employment application and selection process with the implementation of its new automated Human Resources Information System. Lengthy, paper intensive processes will be replaced with paperless, automated routing and approvals for position vacancies. When fully implemented, the system will allow tile public to inquire and apply for employment opportunities from any computer terminal or information kiosk. · The Collier County Loan Consortium made $8,700,000 in Iow interest mortgages for Iow and very Iow-income homebuyers. · Immokalee was designated as an entrepreneurial foreign investment zone. This designation attracts foreign entrepreneurs by substantially lowering the minimum investment required to start a new business or purchase an existing business in exchange for a two-year immigrant visa. · During the summer months, hundreds of loggerhead sea turtles lay nests on County beaches, which are protected through the Collier County Sea Turtle Protection Plan. In 1997, twenty-two miles of beaches were monitored and 818 turtle nests counted. At least 52,500 baby turtles hatched during the season. Twenty-one sea turtle deaths and thirty lighting disorientations were investigated. · In 1997, architectural and site design guidelines were developed for commercial buildings. These guidelines are the first such examples for an unincorporated community in Florida. This project won the State of Florida Planning Association Award of Excellence. · In 1997, over 1,500 residents participated in the household hazardous waste collection program, which resulted in the collection and disposal of 140,734 pounds of hazardous waste. · In fiscal year 1997, the library system circulated 1.6 million items, answered over 100,000 reference questions, processed over 8,000 interlibrary loans and provided more than 1,000 children's story hours to our citizens. In addition to the aforementioned completed projects, the fiscal year 1997-1998 budget includes a number of programs that address population growth and economic development. The major focus of the Capital Improvement Program this year will be on utility water and wastewater improvements as well as continued emphasis on road construction and public safety. The water and wastewater capital appropriations total $37.1 million, road construction $27.9 million and an expansion to the Collier County Jail is budgeted at $25.5 million. DEPARTMENTAL FOCUS Each year the efforts and accomplishments of a specific division within Collier County Government are highlighted. For fiscal year 1997 the Parks and Recreation Department has been selected for this review. The following is a passage written by Maria Ramsay, Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation: "The Parks and Recreation motto of Us to Be the Best" is Department's "Expect a standard reflected by our staff and facilities. The department provides a variety of quality programming from after school and summer camp programs to park ranger interpretive talks and cutting edge sporting events. Recently, the United States Tennis Association recognized the Pelican Bay Tennis facility as one of the nations' best public tennis facilities, an honor received by only one other facility in the country. The Department utilizes over 150 regular full and part time staff to manage 1,110 acres of park land, staff 10 Community Parks and/or Athletic Centers, and oversee 5 public boat launch facilities. Last year 6.5 million park users visited at least one of our 50 park sites. In addition to our current park facilities, construction of two parks is underway. Sugden Regional Park, the first regional park with a fresh water beach in Collier County, will be opening in the summer of 1998. South Naples Community Park, featuring a first class baseball field facility, will follow in the spring of 1999. Department events activities with approximately 100 The also coordinates and community organizations. Some of these activities include the Summer Camp Food Grant Program with public schools, the Optimist Soccer League with 1,400 participants, the Immokalee Chamber of Commerce's Christmas Around the World and the Marco Island Sports Festival. One of our most successful events in 1997 was the Aggressive Skate Association World Championships held at our new 'Sanctuary SkatePark' in East Naples. The in-line skating event was attended by over 15,000 spectators and aired by ESPN and ESPN2 in 170 countries." FINANCIAL INFORMATION The Clerk of the Circuit Court, as the Chief Financial Officer through the Finance and Accounting Department, is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls to ensure that the assets of the County are protected from loss, theft, misuse and to ensure that adequate accounting data is compiled to allow for the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The internal control structure is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable that the cost of control should not exceed the benefits assurance recognizes a likely to be dedved and that the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. All internal control evaluations occur within the above framework. We believe the County's internal control structure adequately safeguards assets and provides reasonable assurance of the proper recording of financial information for both internal and external reporting purposes. Budgetary Control. State of Florida statutes require that all county governments prepare. approve, adopt and execute an annual budget for such funds as may be required by law or by sound financial practices. In compliance with this provision, the budgets adopted by the County are either appropriated or non-appropriated in nature and are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepting accounting principles except as noted in the notes to the general-purpose financial statements. Funds that have appropriated budgets cannot legally exceed their appropriations. Enabling ordinances, such as bond ordinances, in which the expenditure authority extends many years into the future, sets the budgetary controls over funds that have non- appropriated budgets. Budgets are monitored at varying levels of classification detail, however, expenditures cannot legally exceed total appropriations at the individual fund level. Beginning fund balances, available for financing current appropriations, are considered in the budgetary process. As an additional control, the County employs an encumbrance system, which reduces available appropriations within a fund upon the ~ssuance of a purchase order, contract, or other forms of legal commitment. Encumbrances at year-end do not constitute expenditures or liabilities. They are accounted for as a reservation o~' fund balance in the year the commitment is made. While appropriations lapse at the end of the fiscal year, the succeeding year's budget ordinance provides for the re-appropriation of year-end encumbrances. Internal Audit. The Clerk of the Circuit Court maintains an Internal Audit Department. The Internal Audit Department reviews and reports on the internal control environment of the various departments under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners and the Clerk of the Circuit Court to ensure they are operating effectively, efficiently and in a manner that is consistent with management's direction. Cash Management. The Clerk of the Circuit Court strives to keep abreast of current trends in cash and investment management in order to achieve the goals set forth within the County's investment policy. The primary objective of this policy is preservation of capital with significantly lower priority given to earnings. Idle cash balances are invested on a daily basis within the constraints imposed by the Florida Statutes and the County's investment policy. purposes of maximizing interest earnings while not jeopardizing capital, cash balances of all For funds are invested in the County wide cash and investment pool. The County consistently invests the majority of its available cash. Note 2, within the notes to the general-purpose financial statements, categorizes the County's investment portfolio by the levels of investment risk assumed by the County. As can be gleaned from the note, substantially all of the County's investments are insured, registered or physically held in the County's name. The significance of this is that the County has prudently safeguarded its investments to mitigate potential losses, which could result upon the bankruptcy or failure of an investment house or broker. As of September 30, 1997 the market value of the Roard of County Commissioner's portfolio was $225,912,638 and was invested in the following types of investments: ,,, ii I i i I IIII IIIIIIIIIIIII I! I I 6 I I COMPOSITION OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, '1997 I U.S Treasury I Local ~ment Obl~aflonl Suq~ut Funcl~ Trust 8% Demand ~ 11% I I Mutual Functl 5% LJ S Agef~cy Repurchase Secuftttea A~'eements Ba~ef~' 27% i _ Acce1:Xafx~,e$ 2~ Commefcml F. apef 9% I ,~)HRCE 1997 CO~R£I~N.~IVE ANNI. JAI. FINANCIAl. FLEPORT As highlighted in the fiscal year 1995 CAFR, certain derivative type investments were acquired I during the pedod between 1993 and the early part of 1994. This sector of the portfolio has an average life that exceeds the parameters specified in the investment policy The current market value of these instruments is $23.5 million with an average life of 20.5 years. To compensate for I the lack of liquidity caused by this portion of the portfolio, the Clerk has limited current purchases to short term instruments with an active market. Consequently, the average life of the entire portfolio was 4.4 years as of September 30, 1997 which is within the parameters of the County's i investment policy. In addition, the Clerk is aggressively monitoring the market for collateralized mortgage obligations in order to capture opportunities to liquidate any individual instruments that can be sold without sustaining a loss. IThe Clerk of the Circuit Court initiated legal action against the two brokerage houses that sold the County the questionable instruments as well as the County's former external auditor. As of September 30, 1997 one of the complaints had been settled in favor of the Clerk. I The following table presents a historical perspective of Collier County's interest earnings over the past five years: I Fiscal Year F:scal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fund Types 1994 1995 1996 1997 General Fund $1,321,898 $1,774,281 $1,848,308 $2,042,023 I Special Revenue Funds 1,358,278 1,996,633 1,835,593 2,106,648 Debt Service Funds 411,232 495,135 505,608 74(3,272 Capital Project Funds 2,260,253 3,428,435 2,532,581 2,827,754 i Enterprise Funds 5,614,857 6,685,069 5,761,422 6,378,106 Internal Service Funds 376,473 635,523 642,019 815,767 Trust and Agency Funds 131,163 140,749 107,947 147,207 I Total Interest Earnings $11,474,154 $15,155,825 $13,233,478 $15,057,777 Ivii General Gowmm~nt Funcfions. To~al general government r~,enue$ colle~ed by Oollier County during the pas! year ~,mour~l to approximately $158,631,000. This amoun! ine. Jude$ reYenue$ of the general fund, special reYenue and deb! servie.~ fund types. Ta×e$, the large$! general goYemment revenue source, is comprised of $79,037,000 ad Yalorem, $1.528,000 locally imposed gas taxes and $10,557,000 of other ta×e$. GENERAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES ~OR THE FISCAL YEA~ ENDING SEPTEMBER ;30, ~9~? T~x~ i~emst Income Mi$c~41aneou$ ChMge~ /~' S~ce~ 8% S~M Assesses Total general government expend~ures amounted to $142,3~,000, ex~uding ~p~l proje~ ex~d~ures. The ~ la~e~ run.ions are ~eneral g~e~ment a~ public s~e~. ~eneral ~e~ent ~nsists p~aHly of ~nan~al and ad~ini~r~e expend~ures. Public ~fety expend~uces i~clude t~e ~e~s ~ and e~e~en~ Gene/'M ~ viii III IIII III II IIIIIIII III ..... IIIIII1--II- - IIIII Enterprise Funds. Collier County maintains six enterprise funds, which consist of County Water and Sewer, Marco Water and Sewer, Goodland Water and Sewer, Solid Waste Disposal. Emergency Medical Services and the Airport Authority. Enterprise funds are established to finance and account for the acquisition, operation and maintenance of facilities and services, which are intended to be entirely or predominantly self-supported by charges collected from the users served. Combined these operations generated over $62,117,000 of revenues, both operating and non- operating, with Water and Sewer operations contribution approximately $43,249,000 of that total. The Solid Waste operation generated approximately $13,248,000 of that revenue. Internal Service Funds. Collier County maintains six internal service funds, which consist of the Information Technology, Self-Insurance, Office of Capital Projects Management, Department of Management. Internal service funds are established Revenue, Sheriff's Self-Insurance and Fleet to account for services provided by departments of the government for the benefit of other departments of the government. Combined, these funds had revenues of $22,625,000 with expenditures of $22,333,000. Fiduciary Funds. Collier County maintains 12 expendable trust funds and 7 agency funds. Trust and agency funds are established to account for assets held by the County in a trustee capacity or as an agent for individuals, private organizations or other government units. The largest agency funds of the County are the Deferred Compensation Fund, which accounts for funds held on behalf of County employees and the Pine Ridge and Naples Production Park Fund, which accounts for assessment collections and related debt service payments made on behalf of property owners. The total assets for all trust and agency funds are $31,919,000 as of September 30, 1997. Debt Administration. Collier continues to meet its financial County needs through prudent use of its revenues and debt financing programs. In fiscal year 1997 the County issued the $13,000,000 Special Obligation Revenue Bonds, and the $1,870,000 Naples Park Area Stormwater Improvement Assessment Bonds to refinance outstanding commercial paper loans of $14,617,000. As a result of the rofinancing the County was able to fix the interest rate due on the outstanding debt. At September 30, 1997 the County had $199,272,000 of long-term debt outstanding. ! ! 6 B'.i Enterpise Furl 50% Erfel~se F~cl N~es Paya~es 9% O~her 4% C.,c:rm'u~ad ~ United Cx:~rK~f~:~fl 3% 31% General Fixed Assets, The general fixed assets of the County are those assets used in the performance of general government functions and do not include the fixed assets of enterprise and internal service funds, which are reported on the balance sheets of those respective funds. Depreciation of general fixed assets is not recognized in the County's financial records. As of September 30, 1997 the County's investment in general fixed assets was $224,537,000. which represented an increase of $6,253,000 over that of fiscal year 1996. Risk Management. The County's assets and the health care of its employees am protected through a dsk management program that is administered by lhe Risk Management Department. Under this program, a self-insurance fund is maintained by charging premiums to all County departments based on certain formulas which are updated each fiscal year. The Risk Management Department, through its coordinated and continuous efforts in monitoring potential dsk exposures and implementing sound health and safety control programs, coupled with effective claims administration, is stdving to 'meet the goal of minimizing injury claims which result in economic repercussions to the County. Independent Audit. The County is required by Florida Statutes to undergo a financial audit performed by an independent certified public accountant. The accounting firm of Arthur Andersen LLP was selected by the government audit committee to perform the fiscal year 1997 audit. The results of this audit can be found in the independent certified public accountants' report included in the financial section of this report. A WA RDS GFOA Certificate of Achievement. The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada ('GFOA") awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to Collier County, Florida, for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996. The Certificate of Achievement is a prestigious national award, recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local government financial reports. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement. a government unit mu~t publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform I to program standards. The CAFR must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. I A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. Collier County has received a Certificate of Achievement for the last eleven consecutive years, from fiscal year 1986 to 1996. We believe our current report also conforms to the Certificate of Achievement program I requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA for consideration. Distinguished Budget Presentation Award. The Government Finance Officers Association of i the United States and Canada presented an award for Distinguished Presentation to Collier County for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1996. In order to receive th~s award, a government unit must publish a budget document that meets program critena as a pohcy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan and as a communications device The I Distinguished Budget Award is valid for a period of one year only. Presentation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I The timely preparation and publication of th~s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report represents a significant effort by the Finance and Accounting Department as well as the excellent cooperation I and assistance of other County employees who contributed to the preparation. In particular we would like to express our appreciation lo Teri O'Connell, Tom Kelley. CPA. Kelly Jones. Connie Murray, Raymond Milum and Maryalice Bailey. Accountants; Robert W. Byrne. CMA, General IOperations Manager; Shirley Van Vliet, Technical Assistant; Linda Murphy, Nancy Fragione and Sandi Emerick, Financial Specialists; John Johnson. CPA, a dedicated part-time employee, and all of the staff of the Finance and Accounting Department. I Sincere appreciation is also expressed to the Board of County Commissioners, the County Administrator, Division Administrators and the Department Directors for their assistance i throughout the year in matters pertaining to the financial affairs of the County. We hope you find this report informative, accurate, and easily readable. If you should have any questions related to this report or if additional information is desired, do not hesitate contacting Jim I Mitchell, Director of Finance and Accounting at (941) 774-8404. Respectfully, I . ock James L. Mitchell, CIA, CFE, CBA Clerk of the Circuit Court Deputy Clerk I Chief Financial Cfficer Director of Finance and Accounting I rek M. Johnssen, CF:,A Deputy Clerk I Accounting Manager General The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the County of Collier, Florida for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996. The Certificate of Achievement is a prestigious national award recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local government financial reports. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. Collier County has received a Certificate of Achievement for the last 11 consecutive years. We believe our current report continues to conform I to Certificate of Achievement Program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA for Consideration. · I I xii I Certificate of Achieuement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to Collier County, Florida For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 1996 A Certificale of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented b~ ~he Government Finance Officers · Association of the United S~ales and Canada to governmen! units and public employee retiremenl s~tems whose comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) achieve the highest standards in government accounting and financial reporting. Presid Executive Director I REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT~ i To the Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida: I We have audited the accompanying general purpose financial statements of Collier County, Florida (the "County"), as of and for the year ended September 30, 1997, as listed in the Table of Contents. These Igeneral purpose financial statements and the supplemental statements and schedules referred to below are the responsibility of the management of the Count),. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose financial statements and the supplemental statements and schedules based on our audit. I We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards for financial audits contained in Gow'rnment Au,bring Start,lards (1094 Revision), issued by the Comptroller I General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform tl~e audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and i disclosures in the general purpose financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. I opinion, general purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material In our the respects, the financial position of the County, as of September 30, 1997, and the results of its operations and the cash flows of its proprietary fund types for the year then ended in conformity with generally I accepted accounting principles. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards 0994 Revision), we have also issued our report dated I December 19, 1997, on our consideration of the County's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with laws, regulations, contracts and grants. i Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental combining, individual fund and individual account group financial statements and schedules listed in the Table of Contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general purpose financial statements of the County. Such information I procedures applied the audit of the general purpose financial has been subjected to the auditing in statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. I L I Fort Lauderdale, Florida, December 19, 1997. I Ill Il - I Illllll Illlll Il I m'llllll GENERAL FUND THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE GENERAL FUND IS TO ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF THE COUNTY'S OPERATING REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCIAL RESOURCES AND THEIR USES IN CONDUCTING THE GENERAL OPERATIONS OF THE COUNTY, EXCEPT FOR THOSE RESOURCES ACCOUNTED FOR IN ANOTHER FUND. THE GENERAL FUND HAS A GREATER NUMBER AND VARIETY OF REVENUE SOURCES THAN ANY OTHER FUND, AND ITS RESOURCES FINANCE A WIDER RANGE OF ACTIVITIES. THE RESOURCES OF THE GENERAL FUND ARE NORMALLY EXPENDED AND REPLENISHED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS IS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE PROCEEDS OF SPECIFIC REVENUE SOURCES THAT ARE RESTRICTED BY LAW OR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS THE PURPOSE OF THE DEBT SERVICE FUNDS IS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND THE PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL, INTEREST AND EXPENDITURES ON LONG. TERM DEBT, OTHER THAN DEBT PAYABLE FROM THE OPERATIONS OF PROPRIETARY FUNDS. CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS THE PURPOSE OF THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS IS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE FINANCIAL RESOURCES SEGREGATED FOR THE ACQUISITION OR CONSTRUCTION OF MAJOR CAPITAL FACILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE FINANCED BY PROPRIETARY FUNDS. ENTEkPRISE FUNDS THE PURPOSE OF THE ENTERPRISE FUNDS IS TO ACCOUNT FOR OPERATIONS THAT ARE FINANCED AND OPERATED IN A MANNER SIMILAR TO PRIVATE BUSINESS ENTERPRISES -- WHERE THE INTENT IS THAT THE COSTS (EXPENSES. INCLUDING DEPRECIATION) OF PROVIDING GOODS OR SERVICES TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC ON A CONTINUING BASIS BE FINANCED PRIMARILY THROUGH USER CHARGES, OR WHERE PERIODIC DETERMINATION OF REVENUES EARNED. EXPENSES INCURRED, AND/OR NET INCOME IS APPROPRIATE FOR CAPITAL MAINTENANCE, PUBLIC POLICY, MANAGEMENT CONTROL. ACCOUNTABILITY OR OTHER PURPOSES. INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS IS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE FINANCING OF GOODS OR SERVICES PROVIDED BY ONE DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY TO OTHER DEPARTMENTS OR AGENCIES OF THE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT, OR TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL UNITS, ON A COST- REIMBURSEMENT BASIS. TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS THE PURPOSE OF THE TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS IS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ASSETS HELD BY THE COUNTY UNIT AS TRUSTEE OR AGENT FOR INDIVIDUALS, PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL UNITS. COMPONENT UNITS THE PURPOSE OF THE COMPONENT UNITS IS TO ASS!ST THIRD PARTIES WITH THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION AND FINANCING OF VARIOUS PROJECTS THAT STIMULATE ECONOMIC GROWTH, INCREASE OPPORTUNITIES FOR EMPLOYMENT IN THE COUNTY OR PROVIDE AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL HOUSING TO THE PUBLIC. GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT GROUP THE PURPOSE OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS IS TO ACCOUNT FOR THOSE ASSETS USED IN PERFORMANCE OF GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS AND EXCLUDES THE FIXED ASSETS OF PROPRIETARY FUNDS. GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT AccOUNT GROUP THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT IS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE COUNTY'S LIABILITY FOR GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND OTHER GENERAL LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS. WHICH ARE NOT OBLIGATIONS OF THE PROPRIETARY FUNDS. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA ~ B ~11 i~ I~ COMBINED B^L NCE S.EET ALL FUND TYPES. ACCOUNT GROUPS AND DISCRETELY PRESENTED COMPONENT UNITS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 G~em~n~l Fund T~s Pr~a~ Fund Ty~s S~Oal ~bt Capi~l In~ema; ~neral Revenue Se~i~ Pr~ Ente~nse Se~l~ Fund Funds Funds Funds FunOs Fun~s ~SETS ~D OTHER DEBITR ~se~: Cash andinves~n~ S 21.244.575 $ 34.2~.036 $ 9.~3.129 $ 49.298.203 $ 39.951.763 S ~5.436.729 Investmenls ~lh trustee Re~Wables: S~Oal assess~nts 1.852.087 171.559 Inlerest 63.525 244.~ 167.312 251.628 689.~ 52.722 Trade. net 131.146 3.~9.553 69.098 Unbilled 1.530.397 Noles 237.602 O~her 437.202 215.792 Due from o~er ~nds 4.176.142 686.9~ 1.365 61.6~ 26.785 158 Due from ot~er ~ernmen~ 1.8~.5~ 1.188.881 12.5~ 1.017.2~ Advances and de,sits 3.500 1.0~ Invento~ 101.411 737.035 95.244 Prepaid ~ 2.~ 2.740 12.320 Restncted asse~. Cash and invest~n~ ~.~.744 S~oal assessments re~wable: Currenl 878.122 De~e~ed 11.695.~ A~med interest 876.951 Notes re~wable 1.979.119 Due from other governments 1.~3.571 Prope~y. plant and e~u~pment (neL where appli~ble, o~ a~umulated depre~at~on) 351.6~.030 4.~3.392 O~er assem 8.611.105 O~er debit: Amount available in debl semi~ funds Amount to ~ pr~ided ~or retirement of general Iong.te~ debt ' TOTAL ASSETSANDOTHERDEBITS S,,27.~.833 S 37.032.077 S 11.376.492 S 51,018,8~ S 478,~2.~7 S 20.218.393 F~uc~a~y I Fund Types Accounl Groups Pr~mar~ Governmenl Component Units Repo~lin~ Enl,t~ Collier County Trus! General Collier County Induslnal and Agency General Long-Term Total Housing Finance Developmen! Total I Funds Fixed Assets Debt (Memorandum Only) Aulhoril~ Aulhori~ CMerno~andum Onl~f) $ 188.114,614 $ 65.955 S 5.835 $ 188.186.404 18.606.179 $ $ 12,001,592 12,001,592 12,001.592 2.023.646 2.023.646 51.279 1.521.214 1.521.214 4.009.797 4.009.797 1.530.397 1.530.397 237.602 66.000 303.602 215.817 868.811 868.811 35.850 4.988.950 4.988.950 4.103.294 4.103.294 4,550 4.550 1,007.914 1,941.604 1,941.604 17.560 1 7.56O 54.566,744 54,566,744 878.122 878.122 11.695.504 11.695.504 876.951 876.951 1.979.119 1979.119 1.043,571 I 043.571 224,537.385 580.734.807 580.734,807 8.611.105 8.611.105 9.491.004 9.491.004 9.491.004 72.569.880 72.569.880 72.569.880 31.918.63..____..~1 $ 224.537.385 $ 82.060.884 $ 963.810.438 $ 131.955 S 5.835 $ 963,948,228 (CONTINUED) 3 COMBINED BALANCE SHEET ^L~ ~U.D ~'.ES. ^CCOU.T ~.OU.S ~.~ D,SC.~E~ ..~S~.~ CO~.O.~.~ U.,~S (CO.~,.UE~ s~.~E~.~. 30, ,~ _ I Governmental Fund Types Propneta~ Fund Types Speoal Debt Capital Internal General Revenue serwce PrOlects Enferpnse Sennce Fund Funds Funds Funds Funds Funds UADJLIZ/ES_ EQUITY AND_OII:~r.B_CREDITS Liabihties: Vouchers payableandaccruals $ 6,898.773 $ 1.849.800 $ 38.426 $ 1.768,512 $ 3.663,288 $ 571.337 Due to other funds 176.946 703.664 949 2,714,;~55 8,840 Due to Olher governments 670.567 1.275.634 5.097 Due to indWtduals 3.585 Deferred compensalton payable Self.insurance claims payable 6,560.448 Current malunbes of lease obhgabons 29,459 Current maturities of notes payable 215,639 Deferred revenues 3,323 1.958.588 1,847,062 16.987.411 Rel'undable deposits 142,374 Retainage payable 10,970 26.442 1.479,2F~8 Escrowed impact fees Due to holders of speoal assessment bo~ds Payable from restricted assets Vouchers payable 2.809.852 Defen'ed revenues 227,293 Currenl matunbes of holes payable 865,030 Currenl maturibes of revenue bonds 3.376,737 Due to ofher governments 205.837 Accrued interest payable 1.958.531 Cuslomer deposits 387.644 Retainage payable 1.268,427 Landfill liability 4,324.693 General obligation bonds payable Revenue bonds and c~rti§cales of indebledness payable (net) 94.952,177 Commercial paper loan payable Notes payable 17,718,506 Arbitrage rebate liabihh, Capitalized lease obhgations 54.704 Accrued compensaled absences 777.769 421.230 TOTAL LIABILITIES $ 7.902,953 $ 5.817,713 $ 1.885.488 $ 20.241.237 $ 135.465.778 $ 7,646.018 I Fiduciary .. Fund Types Account Groups Prima~ Government Coml~ent Units Re!oortinc,~ Entity Collier County I Trust General ColPer County Industr,al and Agency General Long. Term Total Housing Finance Developmen! Total Funds Fixed Assets Deb! (Memorandum Onl),) Authority Authonty (Memorandum Only) I 900,326 $ $ 67.300 $ 15,757,762$ $ S 15757.762 1,364,196 4.988,950 4.988.950 3.275.980 5.227.278 5.227.278 3,585 3,585 12,001,592 12,001,592 12.001.592 6.560,448 6 560.448 29.459 29.459 215.639 215 639 1.007.914 21.804.298 21.804 298 4.192.163 4.334.537 4.334.537 1.516.680 1 516.680 461.574 461.574 461.574 6.073.447 6.073.447 6.073.447 2.809.852 2.809.852 227.293 227.293 865.030 865.030 3.376.737 3.376.737 205.837 205.837 1.g58.531 1.958.531 387.644 387.644 1.268.427 1.268.427 4.324.693 4.324.693 6.100.000 6.100.000 6.100.000 61.475.000 156.427.177 156.427.177 5.660.000 5.660.000 5.660.000 68.785 17. 787.291 17. 787.291 15.483 15.483 15.483 1.723.836 1.778.540 1.778.540 6.950.480 8.149.479 8.149.479 29.297.192 S $ 82.060.884 $ 290.317.263 S S $ 290.317.263 (CONTINUED) 5 COLL,ER COUNT~. FLOR,DA b B COMBINED B^L~NCE S,EET ALL FUND TYPES. ACCOUNT GROUPS AND DISCRETELY PRESENTED COMPONENT UNITS (CONTINUED) SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 I Governmental Fund Types Proprietary Fund Types Capital Internal m Special Debt General Revenue Service Prolects E nterpnse Service Fund Funds Funds Funds Funds Funds LCQhrTJ~U ED)IJ,~lLrr_lE S. F_QUtT_~ AND_OTHER.CREDI]:$ I Equity and other credits' Contnbuled $ $ $ $ 239.380.~91 $ 2.366,829 I $ Investment in general fixed assels Retmned earmngs Reserved for: I Revenue bond rebrement 9.718.230 Renewal and replacement 400.020 Unreserved 93.078.528 10.205.546 m Fund balances Reserved for: Long-term notes receivable Encumbrances 149.361 4.931.778 7.552.025 m Inventory 101.411 Prepaid costs 2,500 Debt service 6.243.596 [] m Trust fund purposes Unreserved: Designated for: m Impacl fees 363.133 Debl service 3.247.408 Future capital prO~ects 23.225.634 m Undesignated 19.451.108 25.916.953 TOTAL EQUITY AND OTHER CREDITS .19.701.880 .31.214.364 ,, 9.491.004 ,30.777.659 342.577.069 12.572.375 m TOTAL LIABILITIES. EOUITY AND OTHER CREDiTS $ 27.604.833 $ 37.032.077 $ 11.376.492 $ 51.018.896 $ 478.042.847 $ 20.218.393 ! m The notes to Ihe general purpose finanoal stalements are an ~ntegral part of this statement. I 6 I .... ii I I lllll I III III III --~ IIIIIIIIIIII II I ! F~duoa~ Fund Types Account Groups Prima~ Govemmenl Component Units Report, n~l Entil~ I Collier County Trus! General Collier County Induslnal and Agency General Long-Term Tolal Housing Finance Oevelol:)menl Total i Funds Fixed Assets .Debt (Memorandum Only) Authorit~ Authority (Memorandum Only) I S $ $ S 241.747,120 $ S S 241,747,120 224,537.385 224.537,385 224,537,385 I 9,718,230 9,718~230 i 400,020 400.020 103.284.074 103,284,074 66.000 66,000 12.633.164 12.633.164 101,411 101.411 2.500 2.500 6.243,596 6.243.596 2.621.439 2.621.439 2.621.439 363.133 363.133 3,247,408 3.247,408 23.225,634 - 23.225,634 45.368,061 65.955 5.835 45,439,851 2,621,439 224,537.385 673,493.175 131,955 5,835 673.630.965 31,918.631 $ 224.537.385 $ 82,060,864 $ 963.810.438 $ 131.955 $ 5.835 $ 963.948.228 ! COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES, EXPENOABLE TRUST FUNDS ANO DISCRETELY PRESENTED COMPONENT UNITS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Govemmenlal Fund Types Special Debt Capital General Revenue Serv~..e Prolects Fund Funds Funds Funds Revenues: Taxes $ 65.282.321 $ 23.848.862 S 1.991.061 S 7.652.243 License s and permits 96.918 7.315.136 Intergovernmental 21.693.825 7.260.315 3.827.606 2.772.847 Charges for services 9.947.080 2.949.350 272.712 Frees and fodeitures 3.321.677 115.044 Interest income 2.002.023 2.106.648 740.272 2.827.754 Impact fees 7.754.688 Special assessments 1.451.536 1.227.335 538.712 Miscellaneous 3.749.507 564.940 954.397 Total revenues 106.133.351 44.711.831 7.786.274 22.773.353 Expenditures: Cun'ent General government 25.739.707 3.287.880 Pubhc safety 51.114.074 10.858.444 PhysiCal environment 1.730.221 7.000.722 Transportation 11.295.736 Econom,: env~ronmen! 441.444 1.006.980 Human serwces 4.591.354 792.359 Culture and recreat~:)n 8.619.547 5.828.850 Capital outlay 26.2 Debt service 10.007.288 Total expenditures 92.236.347 40.150.971 10.007.288 26.211.685 Excess of revenues over (under) expenchtures 13,897,004 4.560,860 f2.221.014) 13,438,332~ Other financing sources (uses) Proceeds from capital ~eases 1,550,945 Proceeds from loans 3.100,000 1.700.000 Proceeds from rel'unding bonds 14.870.000 - Payments Io refund loans ( 14,617.000) Operating transfers m 8.799.497 8.277.963 4.340.773 7.533.634 Operating transfers out {18.802.536) {11.135,305) (3.159.228) il.933.290) Total other financing sources (uses) fi0.003.039) {1.306.397~ 4.534.545 7.300.344 Excess of revenues and other finanong sources over (under) expen- ditures and other finanong uses 3,893,965 3.254,463 2,313,531 3,862.012 Fund balances at beginning of year 16,022.494 28.224,133 7.239.948 27.321,491 Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (214.579) {264.232;) 162.475) (405.644;t Fond balances as restated 15.807.915 27.959.901 7.177.473 26.915.647 Fund balances at end of year $ 19.701.880 $ 31.214.364 $ 9.491.004 $ 30.777.659 The notes to the general puq3ose f~nanc~al statements are an integral part of this statement. 8 F~uc~ary Fund ?~/pes Pnmar~ Government Component Unill Reporting Entlt7 Collier County Expendable CoIher County Indusirial Trust Total Hous,ng F,nance Development Total Funds {IMemorandum Onl)~1 Aulhonty Authonb~ (Memorandum Onl)~ 791,670 S 99.566,157 S $ $ 99.566.157 21.055 7.433.109 7.433.109 35.554,593 35.551.593 94.635 12,363.777 6,971 23.804 12,394.552 474,646 3,911,367 3,911,367 147,207 7,863,904 1,429 113 7,865,446 ?,75a,688 7,7f~1,688 3.2~?.§83 3.217.583 2?5.?89 $.54a.$33 5.~4.633 1.805.002 183.209.8 ~ 1 8.400 23.91 ? 183.242.128 I 2,449.218 31.476.805 31.476,805 984.008 62.956.526 62.956.526 8.770.943 8.770.943 I 80,665 11.376.401 11,376.401 1.488.424 92'0 24,975 1,514.369 31.795 .5.415.508 5,415.508 63.482 14.511.879 14.511.879 I 26.211.685 26.211.685 10.007.288 10.007.288 I 3.609,168 172.215,459 970 24.975 172.241,404 (1,804.1661 10.994.352 7.430 {1.058) 11.000.724 1,550.945 1,550.945 4.800.000 4,800.000 14.870,000 14,870.000 (14,617,000) (14.617,000) 3.020.500 31.972.367 31.972,367 (729,451 ~ (35.759.810) {35.759,810) 2,291.049 2,816.502 2.816,502 486.883 13.810,854 7.430 11.058) 13.817.226 2,175.867 80,983,933 124.525 6,893 81,115,351 (41,3111 {988.4411 {988.4411 2.134,556 79.995,492 124.525 6.893 80,126.910 2.621,439 S 93.80~.346 S 131.955 $ 5.835 S 93,944.136 ........ III I I COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIOA COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES. EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES (~) B ~ BUDGE T AND ACTUAL (BUDGE TARY BASIS) ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES AND EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 Govemmenlal Fund Types General Fund Speoal Revenue Funds (Non-GAAC)~ Budc. let Aclual Variance Budge! Aclual Variance Revenues: Taxes S 67,553,600 S 65.282.321 S (2.271.279) $ 23.370.400 $ 23.848.862 S 478.462 Licenses and permits 151,700 96.918 (54.782) 6.077,500 7.665.644 1,588,144 Intergovernmental 20,313,289 21,693.825 1.380.536 7,378,365 4,244,388 (3.133,977) Charges for services 10,188,821 9.947,080 (241,741 ) 1.504,100 2.028.408 464.308 Fines and forfettures 3.023.200 3,321,677 298,477 57,200 115.044 57,844 Interest income 903.500 2,042,023 1,138,523 1,049,817 2.106.648 1.056.831 Impact fees Spe~al asse~smenls 1.495,000 1,451,536 (43.464) M~scellaneous 3.262,673 3,749507 486,834 105,277 562.652 457 375 Total revenues 105,3o~ 783 106.133,351 736.568 41.097,659 42,023.182 925523 Expenditures Current: General government 27.908.118 25,739,707 2,168,411 4.726,207 3.208,012 1.518,195 Public safety 51.508.651 51.114.0;'4 394.577 9.109.572 7.103.105 2.006.467 Physical environment 1.892.084 1.730.221 161.863 11,228,240 7.040.722 4.187.518 Transportahon 13,174,523 11.295,736 1.8;'8,787 Economtc environment 564.037 441.444 122,593 1.862,233 1,046.980 815,253 Human semces 4.764.410 4,591.354 173,056 1.114.358 792,359 321.999 Culture and rec~eallon 9.260.329 8.619.547 640.782 8.949.825 5.828.850 3.120.975 Capital oullay Debt service 21.800 21.800 Total expenditures 95.897,629 92,236,347 3.661.282 50,186,758 36.315.764 13.8701~ Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures 9.499.154 13,897,004 4.397.850 (9.089.099~ 5.707,418 14 796517 Other finanong sources (usesl Proceeds from capital leases 1.550.945 1.550.945 Proceeds from toans Proceeds from refunding bonds Payments to refund loans Operating transfers tn 8.250,900 8,799.497 548,597 8.370.229 8.223,856 (146.373) Operaling Iransfers out (20,311.681 ~ {18,802.536t 1,509.145 {12.003.869~ .... {11.757.605) 246.264 Total other financing sources (uses) (12,060,7811 (10,003.039) 2,057,742 (2,082,695) (I,982.804) .<39.891 Excess of revenues and olher finanOng sources over (under) expen- ditures and other finanong uses {2,561,627) 3,893.965 6.455.592 (11.171.794) 3.7'24.614 14.896..;08 Fund balances al begmmng ol year 8,692.433 16,022.494 7,330,061 25.810.314 29.386.169 3.575,855 Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) 1214.579) {214,579,) (288'2031 (288'2031 Fund balances as restated 8.692,433 15,807,915 7,115,482 25,810.314 29.097.966 3.287.652 Fund balances at end of year S 6,130,806 $ 19.701.880 $ 13,571,074 S 14,638.520 S 32.822.580 $ 18.184,060 Governmental Fund Types Debt Se~-~ce Funds Capital PrOjects Funds (Non-GAAPI Bud(:,lel Actual Vanance Bud(~el Actual Variance 2.048.900 $ 1,991.061 S (57.839) $ 8.341.600 S 7.652.243 S (689,357) 3,827.606 3.827,606 4,039.402 2,772,847 (1,266,555) 144,200 272,712 128,512 349.276 740.272 390.996 899.025 2.827.754 1.928.729 8.435.000 12.635.076 4.200.076 1.202.400 1.227.335 24.935 533.800 538.712 4.912 829.338 954.397 125,059 7,428.182 7.786.274 358.092 23222,365 27,653,741 4,431,376 83,724,165 26.211.685 57,512,480 10,679.303 10,007.288 672.0~5 10.679.303 10.007.288 672.015 83.2'24.165 26.211.685 57.512.480 {3.251.1211 (2.221.014~ 1.030.107 I60.501.800) 1.442.056 61.943.856 3,365,000 3.100.000 (265,000) 30,094,300 1,700,000 (28.394.300) 14.870.000 14.870.000 (14.617.000) (14.617.000) 5.234.000 4.340.773 (893.22~') 7.746.987 7.533.634 (213.353) t3.392.8001 {3.159.228) 233.572 ¢2.446.0471 {1.933.2901 512.757 5.459,200 4.534,545 (924.655) 35.395.240 7.300.344 {28,094.89~) 2.208.079 2.313.531 105.452 (25.106.560) 8.742.400 33.848.960 6.394.221 7.239.948 845.727 36.172.946 17.727.835 (18.445.111) (62.475) {62.475) (405.844) 1405.8441 6.394.221 7.177.473 783.252 36.172.946 17.321.991 I18.850.g55t 8.602.300 $ 9.491.004 $ 888.7O4 $ 11.066.386 $ 26.064.391 $ 14.998.005 (CONTINUED) 11 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES. EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES ~ ~ '~ II~ BUDGET AND ACTUAL {BUDGETARY BAS(S) " ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES AND EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 I F~duoa~, Fund T)~pe Total I Expendable T~st Funds (Non-GAAP) (Memorandum Budc~et Actual Variance Bud~let Aclual Variance I Revenues: Taxes S 668,500 S 791.670 $ 123,170 S 101.983,000 S 99,566.157 S (2.416.843) Lcenses and permits 20,000 21,055 1.055 6.249.200 ?, 783.617 1.534.417 Intergovernmental 35.558.662 32.538.666 (3.019.996) Charges fo~ services 11.897.121 12,248.200 351.079 F~nes and fode~tures 321,500 474,646 153,146 3.401,900 3,911,367 509.467 Interest ~ncome 38,300 90,237 51,937 3.239.918 7,806,934 4,567.016 Impacl fees 8.435,000 12.635.076 4,200.076 SpeOal assessments 3.231.200 3.217.583 ( 13.617) hfisCellaneou$ 109.300 21.364 (87,9361 4.306.588 5.287,920 981.332 Total revenues 1.157.600 1.398.972 241.372 178,302.589 184.995.520 6.692 931 E xpend~tures Current I General government 359.200 289.065 70.135 32.993.525 29.236.784 Public safety 100.300 81.100 19,200 60,718.523 58,298.279 2420 244 Physical environment 13.120.324 8.770.943 4.349.381 Transportation 140.899 80.665 60,234 13.315,422 11,376.401 1.939,021 m Economic environment 2.426,270 1.488,424 937.8.46 m Human sera, cBs 46.500 31,795 14,705 5.925.268 5.415.508 509.760 Culture and recreabon 82.000 63.482 18.518 18.292.154 14.511.879 3.78.~,275 Capital outlay 83,724,165 2.3.211.685 57.512,480 Debt service 10,701,103 10,007,288 693.815 m Total expenditures 728,899 546.107 182.792 241.216.754 ..... 165.317.191 75.899.563 · Excess of revenues over · (under) expenditures 428.701 852.865 424.164 , [62,914,165) 19.678.329 82.592.494 Other finanong sources (uses) · Proceeds from cap~tal leases 1.550,945 1,550.945 Proceeds from loans 33,459.300 4,800,000 (28,659.300) Proceeds from refunding bonds 14,870.000 14.870,000 Payments to refund loans 114,617,000) 114.617.000) Operating transfers m 29,602,116 28,897,760 (704.356) · Operating transfers out 1643.682) 1564.912) 78,770 {38.798.079t 136,217,571) 2.580.508 Total other finanong sources (uses) 1643.6821 1564.9121 78.770 26.067.282 1715.866) 126.783.148) I Excess of revenues an(:] other finanong sources over (under) expert- · ditures and other finanong uses 1214,981 ) 287,953 502.934 (36.846.883) 18.962.463 55.809.3.',6 · Fund balances al beginmng of year 959,719 1.410,973 451.254 78.029.633 71.787.419 16.242.214) Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (10.843) (10.843) (981.944) 1981.944) I Fund balances as restated 959,719 1,400,130 440,411 . ,, 78,029.633 70.805.475 17.224.158) Fund balances at end of year S 744,738 S 1.688.083 $ 943,345 $ 41,182,750 S 89,767.938 S 48.585,188 The notes to Ihe general puq:)ose I~nanoal statements are an integral parl of lh~s statement. I 12 I COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA CO~,NED STATEMEnt OF R~NUES. EXPENSES ~D C,~ES RETAINED EARN,NGS. ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES I FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 I Propr~etar~ Fund T~es Internal Total I Enlerpnse Funds Sennce Funds (Memorandum Onl,~) OI3erating revenues: Charges for set. cas S 55.233.932 S 20.033,890 S 75.267.822 I Total operating revenues 55.233.932 20.033,890 75.267.822 Operating expenses: I Personal sauces 13,427,356 5.201.369 18,628.725 O~eratmg 27,050,863 15,866.307 42.917,170 Depreoat~on 8.824.298 1.264,829 10.089.127 Amortization 344.150 344.150 I Total o~)erat~ng e,penses 49,646,667 22.332,505 71.979.172 I Oberatmg ~ncome Iloss) 5,587.265 (2,298.615~ 3.288.650 Non-ol~erat~ng revenues texpenses) Interest income 6.378.106 815, 767 7.193.873 I Interest expense (6,797,896) (6.797.896) M~scellaneous ~ncome 51,126 1,648.050 1,69'9.176 Gain (loss) on disposal of fixecl assets (142.675) 127,405 (15.270) Loss on discontinued prolects (148.426) (148,426) I Grants and entitlement: 453.741 453,741 Total non-operating revenues (expenses) {206.024) 2.591,222 2.385,198 I Income (loss) before operatfng transfers 5.381.241 292.607 5.673,848 Operating transfers: I O1~rat~ng transfers in 4.370.896 26.600 4.397.496 Operating transfers out -, (221.853t (388.200~ 1610.053) i Total operabng transfers 4,149.043 (361.600~ 3.787,443 Net Income (loss) 9,530.284 (68.993) 9.461.291 i Depreciation of contributed assets 4.843.846 507.783 5,351.629 Increase in retained eam;ngs 14.374,130 438,790 14.812.920 i Retained earnings at beginning of year 89,476.416 9.858,907 99,335.323 Prior-period adjustrnent (see Note 22) (653.768;) (92.1511 (745,9191 Retained earnings as restated 88.822.648 9,766,756 98.589,404 I Retained earnings al end of year $ 103,196,778 $ 10.205.546 $ 113,402,324 The notes to the general purpose financial statements are an ~ntegral part of Ibis statement. 13 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA · COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS I ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 I Propnetary Fund Types Inlemal Total I Ente~rise Funds Service Funds (Memorandum Onl~ Cash flows from operating acl~vil~es: Cash received for services $ 52.681.851 S 20.027.839 $ 72.709.690 · Cash received from customer deposits 13.506 13,506 Cash received Irom rebrees f~ services 71.826 71,826 Cash payments off behalf of other governments (14.313) (14.313) · Cash payments for goods and services (25.488.023) (14.723,177) (40.211.200) m Cash payments to employees (13.647.379) (5.315,980) (18,963.359) Net CaSh provided by operating aclivff~es 13.545 642 60,508 13,606.150 I Cash flows from noncap~tal financing actiwbes: Cash operating grants recewed 494,606 494,606 Cash transfers from other funds 26.634,921 26.600 26,661.521 Cash Iransfers lo other funds (22,485.878) (388,200) (22.874.078) Proceeds from insurance refunds/reimbursements 1.648,050 1.648.050 Net Cash provided by nonCap,tal financing actw~t~es 4,643,649 1.286.450 5.930.099 i Cash flows from capital and related financing aclivit~es: I Cash contributions received 14.365,669 14,365.669 Receipts from capital grants 1.613,687 1.613.687 Proceeds from d~sposal of fixed assets 85,561 163,446 249,007 Proceeds from sale of scrap 42,643 42,843 Proceeds from rental of land 8.283 8,283 II Proceeds from loans 5,184,123 5,184,123 Payments for capital acqms~bons (16,675,802) ( 1,171,684 ) (17,64 7,486) Principal Payments on bonds (3,056,234) (3.056,234) Pnncipal payments on notes (1.952,997) (1.952,997) Pnncipal payments on cap~tal leases (27,871) (27,871) Inlerest and fisCal agenl fees prod (6.478.7941 (6,478.794~) Net Cash used for Capilal I and relaled finanong actwilies (6.863,6611 (1,036,109) {7.899.770~ Cash flows from ~nvesting aclivities: · Inlerest and dwidends on investments 6.284.150 797.697 7.081.847 I Nel cash provided by investing activities 6.284.150 797.697 7,081,847 Net increase in cash 17,609.780 1.108.546 18,718,326 I Cash. October 1. 1996 (including S39,716.004 in reslncted Cash) 77.562,'~95 14.420,334 91.982.829 · Prior-penod adjustment (see Note 22) (653.768) (92.151) (745.919] Cash, October 1, 1996 (~ncluding $39,716,004 in restricted Cash) as restated 76.908,727 14,328,183 91,236,910 ! Cash, September 30, 1997 (including $54.566,744,n restricted Cash) S 94.518,507 $ 15,436.729 $ 109,955.236 The notes to the general purpose financial statements are an integral part of this statemenL (CONTINUED) I 14 I I III I IIIII II IIII I II ~1111 II II IIIIll I ...... FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 I RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES Proprietar~ Fund T~pes Internal Total Enterprise Funds Semce Funds (Memorandum Only) Operating in~ (loss) S 5,587,265 $ (2.298,615) $ 3,288,650 Adjustments Io reconcile operating income to (loss) net cash prowded by operating acbwhes: Depreciation expense 8,824,298 1.264.829 10,089,127 Amorbzalion of capital ~mprovemenl prolects 325.619 325.619 Amortization of bond issuance costs 7.894 7,894 (Increase) in accounts receivable (1.277.634) (42,265) (1.319.899) (Increase) decrease ~n due from other funds (2,318) 106.429 104.111 (Increase) in advances and deposits (40) (40) Decrease ~n inventory 9.50C 24,348 33,864 Increase in vouchers payable 350.628 262,328 612.956 (Decrease) in due to other funds (203) (203) (Decrease) rn accrued wages (175,026) (74.022) (249,048) (Decrease) in accrued compensated absences (44,997) (26,856) (71,853) (Decrease) ~n due to other governments (73,099) (13.733) (86,832) Increase in customer deposits payable 13,506 13.506 Increase in self-insurance claims payable 858,308 858.308 Total adjustments 7,958.377 2,359.123 10,317.500 Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities $ 13,545.642 S 60.508 S 13.606,150 Non-cash investing, capital, and financing activities: were non-cash developer contributions of $6,673.046 in the County Water and S~wer Distdct Fund. There There were non-cash contributions from pdvate orgamzations of $300.000 in the Airpolff Authority Fund. The Sohd Waste Disposal Fund received contributions of assets from various funds with a deprecialed value of $210.809. The original cost of these assets was $211,394 with S585 ~n accumulated depreciation. The Department of Revenue Fund received contribubons of assets from various funds with a depreciated value of $135.516. The original cost of these assets was $334,672 with $199,156 ~n accumulated depreciation. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 ~ TM I~ ~ NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 INDEX NOTE PAGE NUMBER 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 17 2 Cash and Investments 26 3 Trade Receivables 28 4 Interfund Receivables (Due From) and Payables (Due To) 29 Fixed Assets 30 5 6 Long-Term Debt 31 by the State of Florida 38 7 Revenue Bonds Administered 8 Conduit Debt Obligations 38 9 Defeased Debt 39 10 Budget to Actual 39 11 Contributed Capital 41 12 Deferred Compensation Plan 42 13 Pension Plan Obligations 42 14 Segment Information - Enterprise Funds 43 15 Operating Transfers 45 16 Fund Equity 46 17 Risk Management 47 18 Landl'ill Liability 48 19 Deficit Retained Earnings 49 20 Significant Contingencies 49 21 Significant Commitments 49 22 Prior-Period Adjustment 50 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS · SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 .NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIE,e ..THE REPORTING ENTITY The primary governmenl cons,sts of Colher County, a political subdivfs~on of the Stale of Florida that was established in 1923 by lhe Florida State Legislature. The County is governed by a Board of County Commissioners which consists of five members elected within single member districts. In addition, there are five ConstitutIonal Officers; the Tax Collector. Property Appraiser. Sheriff, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Supervisor of Elections The Constitutional Officers are elected county wide. The Board of County Commissioners budgets and prowdes all funding used by the separate Constitutional Officers with the exception of fees collected by the Clerk of the C~rcuit Court and the Tax Collector. Under the direction of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Collier County Finance Department maintains the accounting system for the operations of the Board of County Commissioners and the Supervisor of Elections. The Tax Collector, Property Appraiser, Sheriff and Clerk of the Circuit Court each maintain their own accounting systems. For financial reporting purposes lhe operations of the Board of County Commissioners and the Constftutional Officers are combined and presented as the pnmary government. Component umts are legally separate agencies Ihat lhe primary government is financially accountable for or organizabons which should be included in the reporting entity because of the nature and significance of their relationship w~th the primary government. F~nancial accounlabihty ~s determined by the primary government's abihty to appoint the voting majority of the entity's board, impose ils will on the organization, and the existence of a financial benefit/burden relationship or fiscal dependency. The County's blended component units consist of organizations whose respective governing Boards are composed entirely of the Board of County Commissioners serving ex-officio, except for the Collier County Airport Authority whose governing Board is appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. These entities are legally separate. however financial support has been pledged and financial or operational policies may be significantly influenced by the County In accordance with General Accounting Standards Board ("GASB") Statement 14. "'The F,nanc~al Reporting Entity". these orgamzatlons are reported as if they were part of the County's operations. The financial posibon and results of operations of the following blended component units are accounted for in enterprise funds and can be found ~n the proprietary section of this report: Collier County Water and Sewer District The District was established by Chapter 88-499, Laws of Florida, to provide water, sewer and effluent services to certain portions of the unincorporated area of Collier County. The District currently operales three wastewater treatment facilities and two water treatmenl plants. Marco Island Water and Sawer District The District was estabhshed by Collier County Ordinance 77-58 under authority granted by Chapter 153, Part II1. Florida Statutes. The District provides sewer services to customers on a portion of Marco Island. Goodland Water District The District was established by a Special Referendum Election authorized by Collier County Ordinance 75-5 and Section 125.01(q), Florida Statutes. The District provides potable water service to the residents of Goodland. Collier County Airport Authority The Authority was established by Collier County Ordinance 95-67 and Sections 332.001 through 332.120, Florida Statutes. The Aulhority provides Collier County with the services of three a~rports; The Immokalee Regional Airport, the Marco Island Executive Airport and the Everglades City Airpark. 17 m m COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS m SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 · NOTE 1 o SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED THE REPORTING ENTITY - CONTINUED The County's discretely presented component units consist of organizations whose five member boches are appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. The is able County to impose its will on these entitles because of its discretionary ability to remove appointed members from the component units' Boards. GASB Statement 14, "The Financial Reporting Entity", requires that the financial dala of these organizations be reported ir, separate columns lo emphasize that they are legally separate from lhe County. Accordingly, the funds of the following organizations can be found d~scretely presented ~n the combined financial statements: Colli0r County Health Facilities Authority The Authority was established in 1979 by Collier County Ordinance 79-75 for the purpose of assisting health facilities in the acquisition, construction and financing of w~tn~n projects County. The Authority has no assets, liabilities or equity and has not generated any revenues or incurred any expenditures. Therefore, no financial position or results of operations are reported in the accompanying financial statements. Outstanding conduit debt issued by the Authority 'S reported in Note 8, "Conduil Debt Obligations". Collier County Housinq Fiance Authority The Authority was formed in 1980 by Colher County Ordinance 80-66 for the purpose of stimulating the construction of residential housing for Iow and moderate income famihes through the use of public financing. The Authority maintains its own financial records, but does not ~ssue separate, stand alone financial statements. Their financial position and results of operabons are reported in the accompanying financial statements and the outstanding conduit debt issued by the Authority is disclosed in Note 8, "Conduit Debt Obligations"~ Collier County Industrial Development Authority Authority was created in 1978 by Collier County Resolution 78-94 to facilitate the financing of The prOjects that promote economic growth and increase opportunities for employment in the County. The Authority maintains its own financial records, but does not issue separate, stand alone financial statements. Their financial position and results of operations are reported in the accompanying financial statements and lhe outstanding conduit debt issued by the Authority is disclosed in Note 8, "Conduit Debt Obligations". COLL,ER COUNt'. FLOR,D^ 6 "=1 NOTES TO THE GENE . PUR"'OSE ST^TEME.TS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 ,OTE 4. SUMM^R ' Or S,G.,F,C^.T ^CCOU.T,,G PO.,C,ES. CO.T,NUED THE REPORTING ENTITY o CONTINUED Complete financial information on the individual component units can be obtained from their respective administrative offices or from the Finance Departmenl of the Clerk of Circuit Court. Administrative Offices: Collier County Sewer Dislr~cl Collier County Health Facilities Authority Water and 3301 East Tamiami Trail 5811 Pelican Boulevard, Suite 210 Naples, FL 34112 Naples, FL 34108 Marco Island Water and Sewer District Collier County Industrial Development Authority 3301 East Tam,ami Trail 3050 N Horseshoe Drive, Suite 120 Naples, FL 34112 Naples, FL 34104 Goodland Water Dislricl Collier County Housing Finance Authority 3301 East Tamiami Trail 5811 Pelican Boulevard. Suite 210 Naples, FL 34112 Naples, FL 34108 BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accounts of the County are organized on the basis of funds and account groups. Each fund is considered a separate accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts. Fund structures, where applicable, have been designed to comply with all requirements of relevant bond resolutions. Account groups are a reporting device to account for certain assets and liabilities of lhe governmental funds not recorded directly in those funds. The following fund types and account groups are used by the County: GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS General fund - the general fund is the general operating fund of the County. All general tax revenues and other receipts Ihat are not accounted for in other funds, are accounted for in the general fund. The general operaling funds of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, Property Appraiser, Sheriff, Supervisor of Elections and Tax Collector represent sub funds of the County's general fund that are held and accounted for individually, but presented together with the Board of County Commissioners' general fund. Special revenue funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources revenue funds special that are restricted by legal requirements, regulatory provisions or administrative action. Debt service funds - debt service funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of principal, interest and other expenditures on long-term debt, other than bonds and notes payable from the operation of proprietary funds. Capital projects funds - capital projects funds are used to account for financial resources segregated for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by proprietary funds. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA b ~ ~ NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 1- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES- CONTINUEr) BASIS OF PRESENTATION-CONTINUED PROPRIETARY FUNDS Enterprise funds - enterprise funds are used to account for operations that are financed and operated m a manner similar to private business enlerprises. The intent is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods or services to lhe general public on a continuing basis be financed primarily Ihrough user charges, or where periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses recurred, and/or net income is deemed appropnate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability or other purposes. Internal sen/ice funds - internal service funds are used to account for the financing of goods or ser,,~ces prowded by one department to other departments of the County or to olher governmental units on a cost reimbursement basIs. FIDUCIARY FUNDS Expendable trust funds - expendable trust funds are used to account for assets held by the County ~n a trustee capacity or where legally mandated. All of the principal and income be expended in the of their may course designated operations. Agency funds - agency funds are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do nol involve measurement of results of operations. Agency funds are clearing accounts for assets held by a government as an agent for ind~viduals, private organizations and olher governments or funds. ACCOUNT GROUPS General fixed assets account group - this account group is used to account for property, plant and equipment not used in proprietary fund type operations. The general fixed assets account group does not include public domain, infrastruclure, fixed assets such as roads, bridges, curbs and gutters, streets and sidewalks, drainage systems, lighting systems and similar assets that are immovable and of value only Io the County. General long-term debt account group - this account group is established to account for long-term debt and other liabilities not accounted for in the proprietary funds. ACCOUNTING MEASUREMENT FOCUS, BASIS OF AND Basis of accounling refers to when revenues and expenditures or expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Basis of accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made regardless of the measurement focus applied. The modified accrual basis of accounting is used in the governmental, expendable trust and agency fund types. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Available means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter, generally 60 days, to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. Primary revenues including special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services, rents and interest are treated as susceptible to accrual under the modified accrual basis. Property taxes are discussed later in this footnote. Other revenue sources are not considered measurable and available and are not treated as susceptible to accrual. Expenditures are recorded when the related fund liability is incurred. Exceptions to this general rule include accrued compensated absences and principal and interest on general long-term debt. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ~ {~ ~1 ~ ~ ~, NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES-CONTINUED ACCOUNTING AND MEASUREMENT FOCUS - CONTINUE~ BASIS OF In applying the susceplibili~-to-accrual concepl Io intergovemmenlal revenues. Ihe legal and contractual requirements of the numerous individual programs are used as guidance, There are essentially ~o ~pes of these revenues. In one. monies musl be expended on the speci~c purpose or project before any amount will be pa~d to the County; therefore, revenues are recognized based upon the expenditures recorded. In the other, mon~es are vidually unrestricted as to purpose of expenditure and rev~able only for failure lo ~mply with prescribed comphan~ requirements, such as with equal employment oppo~unity. These resources are reflecled as revenues at the hme of receipt, or earlier if they meet the availability criterion. use the accrual basis of accounting, Revenues are recognized in the period in which they are Proprleta~ funds earned and expenses are recognized in the period when incurred, The measurement focus applied Io governmental fund types and to expendable trust fund ~pes is the flow of current financial resources. Only current assets and current liabilities are generally included on the balance sheet. Fund balance is considered a measure of available, spendable or appropriable resources The measurement focus applied to proprieta~ fund types is the ~pital maintenance or fl~ of economic resources measurement focus. All assets and all Ilabihties (current or noncurrenl) are included on the balance sheet. Fund equity is segregated into contributed ~pital and retained earnings. BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY DATA The follow~ng are the statuto~ procedures followed by the Board of Coun~ Commissioners in establishing the budgets for the County: 1 ) Within fi~een days after cedifi~tion of the ad valorem tax roll by the Prope~ ~praiser, the Coun~ budget officer prepares and presents to the Board a tentat~e budget for the ensuing fis~l year. The budget includes all esllmated receipts, balances to be brought fo~ard, and all estimated expenditures, rese~es and balan~s to be ~rried fo~ard at the end of Ihe year as specified in Section 129.03, Florida Statutes. 2) Within eigh~ days of the ce~ifi~tlon of value, bul not earlier than six~-five days after ce~ifi~tion, the Board holds a public hearing on ~he tentative budget and proposed millage rate. At this hearing the Board amends and adopts the ten~tive budget, recomputes lhe proposed millage rate, and announces publicly the percentage, if any, by which the recomputed proposed millage rate exceeds the rolled-back rate. If the millage rate tentatively adopted exceeds that proposed, each taxpayer within the jurisdiction is notified of the increase by first class mail, at the expense of the Board. 3) Within fifteen days of lhe meeting adopting the tentative budget, the Board advedises lhe Count's intent to adopt a final budget and millage rate. 4) A pubhc hearing ~s held by the Board to finalize the budget and adopt a millage rate. This heanng is held not less than ~o days and not more lhan five days after the day that the adve~isement is first published. Prior to September 30. the millage le~ is adopted by a separate vote. In no event is the millage rate adopted all~ to exceed lhe tentatively adopted millage rate. This is followed by the approval and ratifi~tion of the final budget. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED BUDGETS AND BUDGI~,TARY DATA - CONTINUED 5) The resolution approved at Ihe final hearing is forwarded to the Property Appraiser, Tax Collector and Florida Department of Revenue; not later than thirty days following the adoption of the Resolution, the Board certifies to the State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Division of Ad Valorem Tax. Ihat it has comphed with the provisions of Chapter 200, Florida Statutes. 6) The County Administrator approves intradepartmental budget changes that do not alter the total expenditures of the department. All other budgetary changes must be approved by the Board of County Commissioners as a matter o! policy. The initial adopted budget was amended during (he fiscal year in accordance with the Florida Statutes. 7) Budgets are monitored at varying levels of classification. However, expenditures cannot legally exceed total appropriations at the individual fund level. Section 129.07, Florida Statutes, as amended ~n 1978. provides that expenditures in excess of total fund budgets are unlawful. Formal budgetary integration ~s employed as a management control device during the fiscal year for all fund types. Budgets have been legally adopted by the Board for all Board funds except for agency funds and those funds described in Note 10, "Budgel to Actual". The Property Appraiser and the Tax Collector adopt budgets for their general funds independently of the Board. The Clerk of the Circuit Court (to the extent of his function as ex-officio Clerk to the Board and lhe amounts of h~s fee structure as Clerk to the Circuit and County Courts), Sheriff, and Supervisor of Elections prepare budgets for their general funds which are submitted to and approved by the Board. Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent wIth generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for all governmental funds except as described in Note 10, "Budget lo Actual". All unencumbered appropriations lapse at the end of the current year. Capital project costs are budgeted in the year they are anticipated to be obhgated. In subsequent years, Ihe unused budget is reappropriated until the project is completed. Proprietary funds are budgeted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, except that capital related and debt transactions are based upon cash receipls and disbursements. Estimated beginning fund balances are considered in the budgetary process. Differences between estimated beginning fund balances and actual fund balances, if material, are submitted Io the Board as budget amendments. ENCUMBRANCES Encumbrance accounting is utilized in the governmental funds as an extension of the budget process whereby purchase orders, contracts to be executed and other commitments are recorded as reservations of fund balance. It Is the County's ~ntention to honor these encumbrances under authority provided in the subsequent year's budget. Fund balance is reserved to indicate this commitment. ! NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENTS The County maintains a cash and investment pool which is available to all funds. Interest earned is allocated based on the indrVidual fund's average daily balance in the cash pool. Pursuant to the provisions of GASB Statement 31, "Accounting and F~nancial Reporting for Certamn Investments and for External Investment Pools", all investments are stated at fair value (see Prior-Period Adjustment Note 22). Cash equivalents are defined as short-term h~ghly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date purchased. Additionally, the individual fund's equity in the cash and investment pool is considered to be a cash equivalent INVENTORIES AND PREPAID COSTS Inventory is valued at cost which approximates market value, using the first-~n, first-out method. Inventory mn the governmental funds consists of expendable supphes held for consumphon The cost ~s recorded as an expenditure at the time ~nd~vidual inventory items are consumed. Reported ~nventones and prepaid costs are equally offset by a fund balance reserve which indicates Ihat lhey do not constitute available spendable resources. Inventories and prepaid costs of proprietary funds are reported as an expense when consumed. GENERAL FIXED ASSETS General fixed assets are recorded as expenditures in the general fund, capital projects funds and other governmental fund types at the time oi' purchase, and capitalized at cost in the general fixed assets account group. Public domain, or infrastructure fixed assets consisting of certain improvements including roads, bridges, curbs and gutters, streets and sidewalks, drainage systems and lighting systems have not been capitalized. Gifts or contributions are recorded in the general fixed assets account group at fair market value at the time received There is no depreciation expense recorded on general fixed assets. The Counly maintains a pohcy to cal:)~tahze fixed assets which cost $500 or more and have a useful life ~n excess of one year, FIXED ASSETS OF PROPRIETARY FUNDS Land, buildings, improvements and equipment are stated at cost. Contributions of property are recorded at their fair market value on the date donated. Facilities constructed using system development impact fees, collected from developers and customers, are stated at cost The County capitalizes major expenditures for additions and improvements. Major expenditures include ~tems with a cost of $500 or more and with a useful life in excess of one year. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged lo operating expenses. The cost of assets retired or sold. together with the related accumulated depreciation, is removed from the accounts and any gain or loss on disposition is credited or charged to earnings. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 ~ '" mil NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 1- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES- CONTINUED FIXED ASSETS OF PROPRIETARY FUNDS - CONTINUED Depreciation on fixed assets acquired through contributions is recorded as an expense and transferred from retained earnings as a reduction of contributed equity on the balance sheet. Depreciation is calculated usmng the straight-line method. The estimated useful life of the various classes of depreciable fixed assets ~s as follows: Estimated F~xed Asset Useful Life Buildings 20-40 years Improvements other than buildings 2-40 years Equipment 4-10 years CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS Capffal lease obl~abons and the related assets of govemmenlal fund types are accounted fo~ ,3 ~ general long. funds. For capital lease obligalions originating in governmental funds, an expenditure for the asset and the offsetting amount of the financing source is reflected in the statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances. FUND EQUITY Contributed capital is recorded in proprietary funds that have received capital grants or contnbubons from developers, customers or other funds. Reserved retained earnings and fund balance represent those portions of fund equity not appropriable for expenses/expenditures or those portions legally restricted for a specific future use. Designations of fund balance represent tentative plans for expenditures. BOND DISCOUNTS AND BOND ISSUANCE COSTS In governmental funds bond discounls and issuance costs are recognized in the current period. Bond d~scounts and issuance costs for proprietary funds are deferred and amortized over the term of the bonds using the interest method and the straight-line method, respectively. Bond discounts are presented as a reduction of the face amount of bonds payable while issuance costs are recorded as deferred charges. DEFEASANCE OF DEBT REPORTED BY PROPRIETARY FUNDS GASB Statement 23, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Refundings of Debt Reported by Proprietary Activities," is applicable to the proprietary funds. For refundings resulting in the defeasance of debt reported by proprietary activities, this statement requires that the difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the old debt be deferred and amortized as a component of interest expense. The straight-line method is used for amortizabon of the deferred charge. m COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. lg97 NOTE 1- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES-CONTINUED INTEREST COST Interesl cost is charged to expense or expenditure as incurred, except for interest capitalized ~n the proprietary funds, in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement 34, "Capitalizahon of Interest Cost", and FASB Statement 62, "Capitalization of Interest Cost in Situabons Involwng Certain Tax-Exempt Borrowings and Certain Gifts and Grants," when applicable. PROPERTY TAXES Property taxes become due and payable on November 1si of each year and become delinquent on Apnl 1st of the following year. Discounts on property taxes are allowed for payments made prior to the April 1st del,nquent date as follows: November- 4%, December. 3%, January - 2%, and February. 1%. Tax certificates for lhe full amount of any unpaid taxes must be sold not later Ihan June 1st of each year. No accrual for Ihe property tax levy becoming due in November 1997 is included in the accompanying financial statements, since such taxes are collected to finance expenditures of the subsequenl period. Property taxes receivable and a corresponding allowance for uncollectible property taxes are not included ~n the financial statements, as there are no delinquent taxes as of September 30. 1997. Key dates m the property tax cycle for Ihe fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 are as follows: Property Tax Cycle Date Assessment roll comp~led January 1, 1996 Assessment roll certified July 1, 1996 Millage resolution approved No later than 95 days following certification Beginning of f~scal year for tax levy October 1, 1996 Taxes due and payable (levy date) November 1, 1996 Property taxes payable: Maximum discount (4%) 30 days after levy date Due date March 31, 1997 Delinquent (lien date) April 1, 1997 Tax certificates sold Prior lo June 1, 1997 ACCRUED COMPENSATED ABSENCES The County follows the provisions of GASB Statement 16, "Accounting for Compensated Absences". This statemenl provides for the measurement of accrued vacation leave and other compensated absences using the pay or salary rates in effect at the balance sheet date. It also requires additional amounts to be accrued for certain salary related payments associated with the payment of compensated absences. 25 o, ,ouc, s. ACCRUED COMPENSATED ABSENCES - CONTINUED It is the County's policy to allow employees to accumulate an unlimited number of hours of unused s~ck leave and up to 240 hours of unused vacation leave. Effechve March 1, 1996 the County modified the pohcy for s~ck leave pay upon termination. Employees of record on August 2, 1996 may be granted a s,ck leave payment upon termination for any service period earned prior to August 2, 1996. No employee hired after August 2, 1996 shall receive payment for accrued sick leave upon termination. Upon termination employees are granted 100% of allowable vacation hours at the current rate of pay. Accrued compensated absences flowing through governmental fund types are recorded in the general long-term debt accounl group because it does not re(3u~re the use of available and spendable resources at lhe balance sheet date. For proprietary funds, the hab~hty re~ate~ to vested sick and vacation leave ~s recorded on the balance sheet as a long-term liabihty. APPLICATION OF FASB PRONOUNCEMENTS TO PROPRIETARY FUND~ In accordance with GASB Statement 20, "Accounhng and F~nancial Reporting for Proprietary Funds and Other Governmental Entities Thal Use Proprietary Fund Accounting", the County has elected not to apply those FASB Statements and Interpretations ~ssued after November 30, 1989. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and habiht~es at the date of lhe financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting I~erlod. Actual results may differ from those estimaled. TOTAL COLUMNS ON THE COMBINED STATEMENTS. OVERVIEW Total columns on the Combined Statements. Overview (General Purpose Financial Statements) are capboned "Memorandum Only" to indicate that they are presented only Io facilitate financial analysis. Data in these columns does not present financial position, resulls of operatiOns or cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, and such data is not comparable to a consolidation. Inter'fund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. NOTE 2 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS The County maintains a cash and investment pool that is available for use by all funds. Each fund type's portion of this pool is displayed on the combined balance sheet under the heading of Cash and Investments. Investment income is allocated monthly to participating funds based on the percentage of each fund's average daily balance ~n the total pool. In addition, certain investments are separately held by trustees in accordance with bond ~ndentures and other contractual agreements, DEPOSITS All cash deposits are held in qualified public depositories pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 280, 'Florida Security for Public Deposits Act". Under the Act. all qualified public depositories are required to pledge eligible collateral having a market value equal to or greater than the average daily or monthly balance of all public deposits, multiphed by the depository's collateral pledging level, The pledging level may range from 50% to 125% depending upon the- depository's financial condition. Any losses to public deposits are covered by applicable deposit insurance, sale of securities pledged as collateral, and if necessary, assessments against other qualified 13ublic depositories of the same type as the depository in default. 26 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~0 ~ ~11 ~1~ ~1~ SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 2 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS - CONTINUED DEPOSITS - CONTINUED At September 30, 1997 the County had demand deposits of $28,842,102, including discretely presented component unit deposits of $71,790. These deposits were fully covered by federal depository insurance or by collateral, in the County's name as required by Sections 280.07 and 280.08 of the Florida Statutes. INVESTMENTS The County's ~nvestment practices are governed by Florida Statutes 125,31 and the County's ~nvestment policy which was adopted by County Ordinance 87-65. The County is authorized to invest in obl~gahons of Ihe U,S. Treasury. its agencies and instrumentalities, commercial paper, bankers' acceptances, repurchase agreemenls, certificates of deposits, ,~nd the Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund. As with any investment, the securities held by the County are sensitive to different elements of risk. The major r~sks are market, legal and credit risk. Market risk relates to the risk that the market value of an investment will decline dudng the life of the investment. The level of market risk is determined by such factors as the length of time before the investment matures and the likelihood of an investment being sold before its maturity in order !o meet operational requirements. The County conlinues Io hold various U.S. government agency securities, including Federal Home Loan Morlgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association collateralized mortgage obligations that were purchased from 1993 Io 1994. At September 30, 1997 the fair value of these investments was approximately $23.5 million, which is 2% below cost. These investments are recorded in the financial statements at fair value. The County does not intend to sell these securities prior to the earlier of (1) maturity or final paydown, or (2) when the fair value approximates cost. The County currently has the ability to hold these investments as it has sufficient liquidity to meet operational requirements. Legal risk is the exposure to a transaction being determined to be prohibited by law, regulation or contract. Management believes the level of legal risk exposure to Ihe County's portfolio is minimal. Credit risk relates to whether or not the County will be able to recover its investments in a security at the maturity date. The County's investments are categorized to provide an indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the County. Category I includes investments that are insured or registered, or securities held by the County or its agent in the County's name. Category 2 includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the counterparty's trust department or agent in the County's name. Category 3 includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the counterparty or by its trust department or agent, but not in the County's name. Investments that are not evidenced by securities in physical or book entry form are not categorized. 27 September 30. 1997 the County's investments were categorized as follows: At Market Credit Risk Cate.qory Value Cateqory 1: U.S. Aclenc¥ Securities $ 68.449,800 U.S. Treasury Obligations 20,309,391 Total Category 1 88r759r 191 Cateoorv 2: Bankers' Acceptances 21,931,162 Commercial Paper 19,772,244 Repurchase Agreements 4,438,600 Total Category 2 46,142,006 Nol cateqorized: Investment in Deferred Compensation Mutual Fund 12,001.592 Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund 79,009,849 Total not categorized 91,011 r441 Total investments including cash equivalents $ 225,912~638 NOTE 3 -TRADE RECEIVABLES Trade receivables for enterprise funds are nel of an allowance for doubtful accounts as follows: Allowance for Net Trade Doubtful Trade Receivables Accounts Receivables County Water and Sewer $ 1.905.111 $ $ 1,905,111 Marco Water and Sewer 27,364 27,364 Goodland Water 18 1 8,523 Solid Waste Disposal 1,221,947 - 1,221,947 Emergency Medical Services 10,808,569 (10,202,126) 606,443 Airport Authority 30,165 - 30,165 Total $ ,14,011,679 $ (10,202~1261 $ 3,809,553 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 4 . INTERFUND RECEIVABLES (DUE FROM) AND PAYABLES (DUE TO) Due from and due to other funds at September 30, 1997 were as follows: FUND Due From Due To General Fund $ 4,176.142 S 176.946 Special Revenue Funds: Road Otsfncts 1.076 367 Water Management and Pollut;on Control 768 3.449 Unincorporated Areas 203,043 7.261 Grants and Shared Revenues 3.900 70.519 Improvement Distncts 1.141 Sherifl's Grants 51,430 392,751 Fire Control Distncts 866 Miscellaneous Florida Statutes Fee Collections 1.235 Lfghtlng Districts 915 911 Enhancement Fee 229,317 Tounsl Development 395.515 State Housfng Incentwe Partnership 4.572 800 MHz IRCP Fund Account 22.495 686.956 703.664 Debt Service Funds: Parks and General Oblfgat~on Refundmg Bonds 855 Marco Island Limited General Obligation Bonds 489 Isle of Capn Renovations and Expansion 21 1.365 Capital Projects Funds: County Wide Capital Improvement 663 Parks Improvements 31,694 Road Impact Distncts 135 Road Construcbon 30.000 151 61.694 949 Enterprise Funds: County Waler and Sewer 2,346 6.775 Marco Water and Sewer 40 Goodland Water 4 Solid Waste Disposal 24.439 62 Emergency Medical Service 20 Airport Authority 2.707.454 26.785 2.714.355 Internal Service Funds: Information Technology 8,726 Office of Cap,Iai ProJects Management 158 Department of Revenue 114 158 8,840 Trust and Agency Funds: Inmate Welfare 276 6.692 County Drug Abuse 559 Cdminal Justice 26.768 State Court of Administration 164.539 Confiscated Property 3.900 Law Enforcement Training 835 Clerk of the C~rcuit Court 398.298 Sheriff 514 32.980 Tax Collector 6.889 552.101 GAC Land Sales. Roads and Canals 64 Deposits 225.632 Pine Ridge and Naples Producbon Park 9 35.850 1.384.196 Total All Funds S 4.988.950 S 4.988.950 29 NOTE 5 - FIXED ASSETS A summary of changes fn the general fixed assets for Ihe year ended Seplember 30. 1997 is as follows: Improvements Other Than ConstructiOn Land Buildinqs Bu~ldmcjs Equipment In Progress To~31 Balance 10/1/96 $ 29.192.040 $ 95.041.450 $ 32.776.501 $ 52,397,744 $ 8.876.535 $ 218284.270 Additions 443,948 140.602 593.197 6.943.469 3.636.421 11.757.637 Deletions (3.173.116) (I .139.7481 (4.3'. Z 8,541 Transfers fn 386,453 2.945.991 39,503 3,37 t .947 (182:103) (3 615) {IT045~4431 {3.332.444) (4.563 505,~ Transfers out Balance9/30/97 S 29,635.988 $ 95.386.402 S 36.312.074 S 55.162,157 S 8,040764 $ 224.537385 Proprietary fund property, plant and eclu~pment at September 30, 1997 consisted of the following: Improvements Less Other Than Accumulated Construcbon Land Buddings Bu,ld~n(~s Equipment Depredation In I:h'o~ress Total Enterprise Funds: County Water and Sewer $ 4,473,799 $ 115.026,924 $ 245.264.525 $ 4.391,462 $ (69.101.2621 $ 29.717.105 $ 329.772.553 Marco Water and Sewer 860 4.743.740 (1.444,767) 3.299.833 Goodland Water 365 1,211.441 (772,348) 356,877 796.335 Solid Waste D~sposal 1,670.490 271.130 10,640,340 683.342 (4,968.150) 214.795 8,511.947 Emergency Meal,cai Services 221,588 3.127 2,148.240 (1,161.3661 1.211,589 Airporl Authority 1~289r400 1,405~269 4~115.612 713r901 (375r684} 893.275 8.041.773 Total Enterprise Funds 7~434~914 116,924.911 265,978,785 7.936~945 (77.823,577} 31,182.052 351,634.030 Internal Serwce Funds: Information Technology 1.391,752 (678,694) 713.058 Self Insurance 40.502 (17,977) 22.525 Office of Capital Projects Management 495.239 (274,232) 221.007 Deparlment of Revenue 850.253 (388,217) 462.036 Fleet Management 149.940 5~738~881 (2.744.055) 3.144.766 Total Internal Service Funds 149,940 8~516~627 {4.103.175) 4,563.392 Total Proprietary Funds $ 7,434,914 S 117.074.851 S 265,978,785 S 16,453.572 $~S 31.182.052 S 356.197.422 30 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ~ B NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM DEBT SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT The following is a summary of changes in general long-term debt for the year ended September 30, 1997: 000's Omitted October Debt Debt September 1. 1996 Issued Retired 30, 1997 General Obligation Bonds $ 7,240 $ $ (1,140) $ 6.100 Revenue Bonds And Certificates of Indebtedness 47,585 14,870 (980) 61,475 Commercial Paper 19,287 4,800 (18,427) 5,660 Notes Payable 192 (123) 69 Accounts Payable 67 67 Accrued Compensated Absences 7,662 28 (740) 6,950 Capitalized Leases 381 1,551 (208) 1,724 Arbitrage Rebate 4 11 15 Total $ 82,351 $ 21,327 $ (21,6181 $ 82,060 The following is a summary of changes in proprietary fund long-term debt for the year ended September 30, 1997: 000's Omitted October Debt Debt Amortized September 1, 1996 Issued Retired Discount 30. 1997 Revenue Bonds $ 101,554 $ - $ (3,236) $ 11 S 98,329 Notes Payable 14.921 5,872 (2,005) 11 18.799 Capitalized Leases 112 (28) 84 Total $ 116,587 $ 5,872 $ 15,2691 $ 22 $ 117,21~2 31 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 B '~ NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM DEBT - CONTINUED DESCRIPTIONS OF BOND ISSUES AND NOTES PAYABLE Bonds and notes payable at September 30. 1997 were composed of the following: General Obhqation Bonds $5,000,000 1989 Marco Island Beachfront Renourishment Facilities Limited General Obligabon Bonds due m annual installments of $270,000 !o $630,000 through July 1, 2000; interest at 6.60% to 7.10%. $ 1.765,000 $5,030,000 1996 Public Park and Recreation Municipal Service Taxing Unit General Obligation Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $65,000 to $795,000 through July 1,2003; interest at 4.00% to 4.20%. 4,335,000 Obligation Bonds $ 6,100.000 Total General Revenue Bonds and Certificates of Indebtedness $5,000,000 1973 Improvement Revenue Certificates due in annual installments of $25.000 to $350,000 through July 1, 2003; interest at 5.50% to 6.25% Race lrack revenues are pledged for the payment of these bonds S 1,845,000 $8,225,000 1992 Capital Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $240,000 to $635,000 through October 1, 2013; interest at 2.70% to 5.80% Local government half-cent sales tax revenue is pledged for the debt service on these bonds. 7.215,000 $30,415,000 1994 Capital Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $1,090,000 to $2,790,000 through October 1, 2012; interest at 4,35% to 6.00% Local government half-cent sales tax revenue is for the debt pledged service on these bonds. 30,415,000 $5,770,000 1995 Road Improvement Refunding Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $290,000 to $510,000 through June 1, 2010; interest al 3.60% to 5,375%. Ninth cent and seventh cent gas lax revenues are pledged for debt service on these bonds. 5,160,000 $2,145,000 1996 Guaranteed Entitlement Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $175,000 to $360,000 through October 1, 2002; interest at 4.19% fixed rate. State revenue sharing receipts are pledged for the debt service on these bonds. 1,970,000 $13,000,000 1997 Special Obligation Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $965,000 to $2,560,000 through March 1, 2004; interest at 3.70% to 4.35%. Non ad valorem revenues are pledged for debt service on these bonds. 13.000,000 $1,870,000 1997 Naples Park Area Stormwater Improvement Assessment Bonds due in annual installments of $75,000 to $185,000 through September 1, 2012; interest at 6.45% fixed rate. Stormwater improvement assessment proceeds are pledged for the debt service on these bonds. 1,870,000 Total Limited Obligation Revenue Bonds $ 61,475,000 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~O B ,'~1 ,~ SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 6- LONG-TERM DEBT. CONTINUED DESCRIPTIONS OF BOND ISSUES AND NOTES PAYABLE - CONTINUED Commercial Paper $6,970,000 Commercial Paper ~ssued by the Florida Local Government Finance Commission Pooled Commercial Paper Program, variable rate for the current fiscal year of 3.84% to 4.19%, collateralized by non ad valorem revenue. '$ 5,660.000 Notes Payable $160,500 1993 note payable to a financial inslitution, collateralized by ad valorem taxes collected within the Isle of Capri F~re Distr~ct, payable ~n annual installments of S22,928 through April 2000. Interest payable al 6.63% per annum. '$ 68,785 Enterprise Fund Revenue Bonds S1,960,000 1981 Marco Island Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of S7,736 to ,$100.293 through June 1, 2021; interest at 5.00% Principal and interest are payable from the net revenues of the system and special assessment collections. ,$ 185,684 $468,500 1982 Goodland Water District Water Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of `$2,000 to ,$110,000 through September 1, 2021; interest at 5.00%. Principal and interest are payable from the net revenues of lhe system and special assessment collections. 161.000 S1,250,000 1988 Marco Water and Sewer District Special Assessment Bonds due in annual installments of ,$125,000 through May 1, 1998; interest at 6.75% to 8.00%. Principal and interest are payable from the net revenues of the system and special assessment collections on a subordinated basis to the 1981 Marco Island Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds. 55,000 ,$15,960,000 1990 Collier County Water and Sewer District Sewer Assessment Bonds due ~n annual installments of $290,000 to $1,120,000 through October 1, 2011; interest at 6.10% to 7.15%. Principal and interest are payable from special assessment collechons and the net revenues of the system on a subordinated basis to the 1991, 1992 and 1994 County Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds. 2,525,000 S55,225,000 Collier County Water and Sewer District, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Ser~es 1991. Due in annual installments of $170,000 to $3,590,000 through July 1, 2021; interest at 4.40% to 6.50%. Principal and interest ar~ payable from the net operating revenues of the system, system development fees and special assessment collections. 24,640,000 ,$13,090,000 Collier County Water and Sewer District, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1992. Due in annual installments of ,$595,000 to S965,000 through July 1, 2010; interest at 3.20% to 6.375%. Collateralized by a parity first lien on the pledged revenues listed on the S55,225,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1991. 9,950,000 Total carr,ed forward S 37,516,684 COLL,ER COUNt. FLOR,DA NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM DEBT - CONTINUED DESCRIPTIONS OF BOND ISSUES AND NOTES PAYABLE - CONTINUED Total brought forward 5 37.516.684 524,225,000 1994 Taxable County Water and Sewer Refunding Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $375,000 to 52,315.000 through July 1, 2010; interest at 3.35% to 6.88% Collateralized by a parity hrst hen on the pledged revenues listed on the 555,225,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds. Series 1991. 21.190.000 540,320,000 1994 County Water and Sewer Refunding Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of 555,000 to $,4.315.000 through July 1, 2021' interest at 3.0% to 5.35%. Collateralized by a parity first hen on the pledged revenues listed on the S55.225,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds. Series 1991 39,730.000 98.436.684 Unamortized bond discount (107.770) Total enterprise fund revenue bonds 98,328.914 Less current portion of bonds payable from restricted assets (3.376.737) Long-term portion of enterprise fund revenue bonds 5 94.952.17~7 Enterprise Fund Notes Payable $5,890,100 note payable to private water and sewer company, payable through use of water and sewer system development fee credits by company or its assignees, or, to the extent of unused credits, payable at the current cash value of the credits (minimum of the original face value)in 2006. Non interest bearing note; interest imputed at 7.00%. 5 13.153 51,469,999 County Water and Sewer District note payable to private developers, payable Ihrough use of water and sewer system development fee credits. Non interest bearing note. 172.721 $41,167 County Water and Sewer District agreement with private developers payable through use of water and sewer syslem development fee credits. Non interest bearing agreement. 41,167 514,547,667 State Revolving Fund Loan to be drawn down as required for construction commitments, interest payable at 4.25% repayable in 20 annual payments commencing Oclober 1, 1992, collaleralized by a lien on pledged revenues consisting of net revenues (as defined in the loan resolution) from the operations of the County Water and Sewer System, proceeds derived from the levy of special assessments levied upon the properties benefited by the project, system development fees and connection fees. The lien shall be subordinate in all respects to liens placed upon pledged revenues established by bonded indebtedness 11,607.768 Total carried forward S 11,834.809 34 COLUER COUNTY. FLORIDA NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM DEBT - CONTINUED DESCRIPTIONS OF BOND ISSUES AND NOTES PAYABLE - CONTINUED Total brought forward $ 11.834,809 $5.140,768 State Revolving Fund Loan to be drawn down as required for construction commitmenls, interest payable at 2.65% repayable in 40 semiannual payments commencfng January 15, 1999, collateralized by a lien on pledged revenues consisting of net revenues (as defined in the loan resolution) from the operations of the County Water and Sewer System. system development fees and connection fees. The lien should be subordinated ~n all respects to liens placed upon pledged revenues established by bonded indebtedness. 5,140.768 $2,000,000 Commercial Paper issued by the Florida Local Government Finance Commission Pooled Commeroal Paper Program, variable rate for the current fiscal year of 3.84% !o 4.19%, collateralized by non ad valorem revenue. 1.835.000 18,810,577 Unamortized discounts ( 11.402) Total enterprise fund notes payable 18,799,175 Less current portion of notes payable from unrestricted assets (215,639) Less current portion of notes payable from restricted assets (865,030) Long-term portion of enterprise fund hOles payable $ 17,718,506 SUMMARY OF DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY The total annual debt service requirements to maturity of long-term debt, excluding compensated absences, capitalized leases and discounts, are as follows: General Long-Ter.m Proprietary Debt Funds Totals 1998 $ 11,163,507 $ 10,744,766 $ 21,908,273 1999 11.368,176 11,305,908 22,674,084 2000 11,259,899 11,219,962 22,479.861 2001 7,426,287 11,678,702 19,104,989 2002 8,119,300 10,679,627 18.798,927 Thereafter 52,367.540 129,819,791 182,187,331 Total debt service requirement 101.704,709 185.448,756 287,153,465 Less amount representing interest (28,400,924) (68,201,495) (96,602,419) Total $ 73,303,785 $ 117,247,261 $ 190,551,046 35 I COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA ~ B ~1 I~ I NOTES TO THE GENERALsEPTEMBERPURPOSE30. FINANCIAL1997 STATEMENTS NOTE 6-LONG-TERM DEBT-CONTINUED I SUMMARY OF DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY - CONTINUED The amount available in debt service funds to service general obligation bonds, revenue bonds and certificates I of indebtedness, commercial paper and notes payable obligations are $88,980, $9,315,305, $15,160 and $71,559, respectively. INTEREST CAPITALIZED I Interest costs on long-term debt incurred and capitalized during the year ended September 30. 1997 were as follows: I Total Interest Interest Cost Net Interest Cost Incurred .. Capitahzed Expense I Enler~3rise Funds $ 6,8,~9,119 $ {6112,23) $ 6p797,896 LEGAL DEBT MARGIN The Constitution of the State of Florida and the Florida Statutes set no legal debt limit. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Official statements and County resolutions authorizing the general obligation and revenue bonds establish certain accounts and determine the order in which certain revenues are to be deposited into those accounts as well as establish reserve requirements. All required balances were maintained. Water and sewer revenue bonds are payable solely from and secured by a first lien upon and pledge of the net revenues and certain other fees and charges derived from the operation of the County's water and sewer system. The pledge of the net revenues derived by the County from the operation of the water and sewer system does not constitute a lien upon the water and sewer system or any other property of the County. The covenants of the resolutions authorizing the County Water and Sewer District Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1991, 1992 and 1994 include, among other things, an obligation for the County to fix, establish and maintain such rates and collect such fees, rentals or other charges for the services and facilities of Ihe water and sewer system, and to revise the same from time to time whenever necessary, so as to always provide in each year net revenues, as defined in the resolutions authorizing the revenue bonds, which together with the system development fees and special assessment proceeds received in each fiscal year shall be adequate to pay at least 125% of the annual debt service requirements for the Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds; provided, however, that net revenues in each fiscal year shall be adequate to pay at least 100% of the annual debt service for the bonds. The Marco Island Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1981 and Series 1988 along with the Goodland Water District Water Revenue Bonds require the County to maintain such rates and fees (including special assessment proceeds) to provide revenue sufficient to pay necessary expenses of operating and maintaining the systems and to meet at least 100% of the annual debt service for the bonds. The bond resolubon of the $15,960,000 Collier County Water and Sewer District Sewer Assessment Bonds, Series 1990. provides for the establishment and maintenance of a reserve account in an amount equal to the reserve account requ~rernent. which shall be maintained for the benefit of the holders of the bonds. The reserve account requirement ,s defined as an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the maximum annual debt service for all outstanding bonds; (ii) 125% of the average annual debt service for all outstanding bonds; or (iii) 10% of the aggregate proceeds of the bonds. In the opinion of management, the water and sewer funds were in compliance with these covenants for the year ended September 30, 1997. 36 COLUER COUNTY. FLOR'DA ~ B 4 ~ :~ NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE F,NANC,AL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE $-LONG-TERM OEBT- CONT,NUED LEASE OBLiGATiONS The County has various capita~ ~ease commitments. At year end. equipment acquired through capita~ ~eases was recorded in the general fixed assets account group and in the proprietary funds in the amounts of $1,591.945 and $145,475, respectively. Capitalized leases payable at September 30, 1997 amounted to $1.807,999. These obligations, which are collateralized by equipment and vehicles, have annual installments ranging from $246.514 to $530.685 including interest ranging from 0% to 60% and mature through 2002~ Future minimum capital lease obligations as of September 30, 1997 were as follows: Internal General Service Long-Term Debt Funds Total 1998 S 497.297 S 33,388 $ 530,685 1999 484,298 33.388 517,686 2000 356,797 24,104 380,901 2001 356,798 356,798 2002 246,514 246.514 Total minimum lease payments 1.941.704 90.880 2,032,584 Less amount representing interest (217.868) (6,717) (224.585) Present value of minimum lease payments $ 1,723,836 $ 84,163 $ 1,807,999 The County has entered into numerous operating leases. Rental expenditures for leased facilities and equipment for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 were as follows: Board of County Commissioners $ 587.122 Tax Collector 7.002 Total $ 594,124 Commitments for future minimum operating lease payments, contingent rentals and subleases are not significant. 37 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 ~ TM ~I~ NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE 7 - REVENUE BONDS ADMINISTERED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA Section 206.41, Florida Statutes, imposes an exc~se lax on motor fuel sold in Florida. This tax is known as.the Constitutional Gas Tax (also known as the 5th and 6th Cent Gas Tax). This tax is collected by the State Department of Revenue and transmitted to the State Board of Administralion. The State Board of Administration makes payments necessary to reduce the bonded indebtedness issued pursuant to the provisions of the State Constitution for road and bridge purposes. Excess taxes are transmitted to the State Department of Transportation. which can appropriate funds for work done in Collier County and also transmit funds to the County itself lo fund h~ghway cap,Iai ~mprovements. In accordance w,th the above, the State Board of Administration administers Collier .County Road Bond Certificates of Indebtedness dated 1979, of which S6,320,000 is outstanding as of September 30. 1997~ Th~s ,ssue is not recorded ,n the general Iong-lerm debt account group, because the principal and interest are required to be pa,d solely from the gross revenue of the Second Gas Tax administered by the State Board of Administrabon. These bonds are nol an indebtedness of Collier County. NOTE 8 - CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATIONS $17,335,000 Pine Ridqe Industrial Park and Naples Production Park Special Assessment Bonds, Series 1993 During September 1993, the County issued, on behalf of the property owners within the Naples Production Park and Pine Ridge Industrial Park Districts, $17,335,000 of Special assessment bonds. The bond proceeds from the issue were used to repay amounts previously borrowed under the County's line of credit arrangement. Special assessments are pledged by property owners within the Districts. The County is not obligated to repay the special assessment debt if sufficient assessment funds are not available. The County functions as agent for the property owners in collecting the assessments, forwarding the collections to bondholders, and initiating foreclosure proceedings, if appropriate. The special assessments received and the related debt service payments are accounted for ~n an agency fund on behalf of the property owners. As of September 30, 1997 these bonds have an outstanding principal amount of $14,395,000. Componenl Unit Conduit Debt The Industrial Development Authority, Housing Finance Authority and Health Facilities Authority, all component units of Collier County, issue debt instruments for the purpose of providing capital financing to independent third parties. Industrial development revenue bonds have been issued to provide financial assistance to public entities for the acquisition and construction of industrial and commercial facilities. Housing revenue bonds have been issued for the purpose of financing the development of multi-family residential rental communities. The health facility revenue bonds were issued to provide financing for the construction of a health park facility. These bonds were secured by the financed property, a letter of credit or a corporate guarantee. The primary revenues pledged to pay the debt are those revenues derived from the project or facilities constructed. Neither the issuer. nor the County is obligated in any manner for repayment of the bonds. Therefore, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. As of September 30, 1997 the outstanding principal amount payable on all component unit conduit debt was $118,710,000 and is made up of the following: Industrial development revenue bonds $ 62,525,000 Housing revenue bonds 30,345,000 Health facilities revenue bonds 25,840,000 Total $ 118,710,000 38 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 B ''~ ~i~ '~., "O?~S ~O ~'"~ ~"~' "U""OS~ "'"'~C'A~ S~"~'S NOTE 9 - DEFEASED DEBT The County has defeased certain outstanding bond issues by placing the proceeds of new bonds m ~rrevocable trusts to provide for all future debt service payments on the defeased debt. Accordingly. the trust accounts and the defeased bonds are not included in the County's financial statements. At September 30. 1997 the following issues were considered defeased: Defeased Original Bonds General Lonq-Term Debt Debt Outstanding 1986 Capital Improvement Program Revenue Bonds, Sub-Series 5 Mode A $ 12.245,000 $ 10.205.000 Total Defeased General Long-Term Debt $ 12,245.000 $ 10.205,000 Defeased Original Bonds Enterprise Fund Debt Debt Outstanding 1983 County Water and Sewer District Refunding Bonds $ 22,000.000 $ 16,925,000 1991 County Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds (partially defeased $25.930,000) 55,225,000 25.930,000 Total Defeased Enterprise Fund Debt $ 77,225.000 $ 42.855.000 39 ............ II II ..... IIIIIIII IIII I IIIIII IIII IIIIIII Iii iii1~11 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 10 - BUDGET TO ACTUAL Accounting principles used Io prepare the budget are different from those used to prepare the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The following table reconciles lhe amounts on the Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget to Actual (which is presented on a non-GAAP budgetary basis) to the amounts on the Combined Statement of Revenues. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances (which is presented on a GAAP basis). Special Capital Expendable Revenue Projects Trust Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expendttures and other financing (budgetary basis) $ 3.724.614 $ 8.742.400 $ 287.953 uses Basis difference: Deferred revenue - (4,880.388) Interfund advance budgeted as operating transfer (453,908) - Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses (GAAP basis budgeted funds) 3.270.706 3.862.012 287.953 Entity difference: Non-budgeted funds: Public Guardianship Program (16,243) - Law Library 7.450 Inmate Welfare 134,510 Impact Fees Escrow 56,970 Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses (GAAP basis) $ 3,254~463 $ 3r862,012 S 486,883 4{) NOTE '11 - CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL The following is a summary of changes in contributed capital: ENTERPRISE FUNDS County Water Marco Water Emergency and and Goodland Solid Waste Medical Airport Sewer Sewer Water Disposal Services Authori~ Total October1. 1996 $ 213.896.777 $ 3.390.508 $ 813.338 $ 496.774 $ 1.089.809 $ 5.364.483 $ 225.051.689 Contributions Source: Grants 870.490 870.490 Developers 6.594.714 300.000 6.894.714 Customers 11.621.257 - - 11.621.257 Other Funds 78.332 - 4.570 - 82.902 Dispositions (151.704) (1) (11.929) (133.281) - (296.915) Depreciation (.4.537.591,1 (.84.7631 ~20.3331 (.4.189) (134.143) (62.827! (4.e43.8461 September30.1997 $ 227.501.785 $ 3.305.745 $ 793.004 $ 485.226 $ 822.385 $ 6.472.146 $ 239.380.291 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Office of Capital Information Self Projects Department Fleet Technology insurance Manacjement of Revenue Manacjement Total October 1. 1996 $ 606.719 $ 7.559 $ 947.740 ~' 12.589 $ 783.554 $ 2.358.161 Contributions Source: Other Funds 12.566 27.386 135.516 343.165 518.633 Dispositions (1.328) (824) (30) (2.182) Depreciation (99.9741 (1.191} (24.563) (46.688) (335.367) (507.783.) September30. 1997 $ 517.983 $ 6.368 $ 949.739 $ 101.387 $ 791.352 $ 2.366.829 41 COLL,ERCOUN ', . NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE 12 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN Under separate agreements w,th the Nabonal Association of County Officers and the Internabonal City Managers Assoc~at,on. the County offers its employees a choice of two deferred compensation plans created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plans, available to all County employees, permit them to defer a porhon of tl~e~r salary unt,I future years. The deferred compensation ~s not ava,labia to employees or the,r estate until termInation, retirement, death or unforeseeable emergency All amounts of compensation deferred under the plans, all property and rights purchased with those amounts. and all income attributable to Ihose amounts, property, or rtghts are (unlil paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the County (without being restricted to the of benefits under the to the claims of the County's general creditors. Part,opants' prowslons plans), subject only rights under the plans are equal to those of general creditors of the County ~n an amount equal to :he fa~r market value of lhelr deferred compensat,on account. Assets of the deferred compensation plans are recorded at fair market value and are accounted for ~n an agency fund. It is the opinion of the County's legal counsel that the County has no liability for losses under the plans, but must exerctse due care as would be expected of an ordinary prudent investor. The County believes that it ~s unlikely ~t w~ll use the assets to sat,sly the claims of general creditors in the future. GASB Statement 32. "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan". was issued in October 1997. ThIs statement establishes accounting and financial reporting standards for IRC Section 457 deferred compensation plans of state and local governments and provides that the activities of the deferred compensation plan be reported as an expendable trust fund. The Statement is required to be adopted for periods beginning after December 31, 1998. The County anticipates that it will adopt the provisions of GASB Statement 32 effective with the beginning of fiscal year 1998. NOTE 13 - PENSION PLAN OBLIGATIONS Retirement Plan The County follows the provisions of GASB 27, "Accounbng for Pensions by State and Local Governmental Employers". as described ~n the following disclosure. Plan Description The County contributes to the Florida Retirement System (the "System"). a cost sharing, multiple employer. defined benefit pension plan administered by the State of Florida, Division of Retirement. The System provides retirement and disabihty benefits, annual cost-of-liwng adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The Florida Legislature estabhshed the System under Chapter 121, Florida Statutes, and has sole authority to amend benefits prows~ons. Each year the System issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. The report may be obtained by wdbng to the Florida Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement, 2639 North Monroe Street, Building C, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1560. Fundinq Policy The System is non-contributory for employees and the County is required to contribute at an actuarially determined rate. During the fiscal year, the rate was approximately 20% of annual covered payroll. The contributions of the County are established and may be amended by the State Legislature. The County's contributions to the System for the years ending September 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995 were $14,782,986. $13,176,094 and $11,770,770, respectively. 42 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA NOTE8 TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 14 - SEGMENT INFORMATION - ENTERPRISE FUNDg The County maintmns six enterpnse funds which provide waler, sewer, solid waste disposal, emergency services and airport services. Segment mformal~on for the year ended September 30. 1997 is as follows: County Water Marco Water Goodland and Sewer and Sewer Water Operallng revenue $ 37.471,873 $ 570,906 $ 193,752 Operating expenses: Deprecialion and amortization 8.398.840 117.417 56.859 Operating expenses 18.086.138 489.914 255.104 Operating income (loss) 10.986.895 {36.425) .,, (118.211! Operating grants Net non-operating revenues (expenses) (1.899.7501 45.085 34.696 Income (loss) before operating transfers 9.087.145 8.660 (83.515~ Operating transfers in 159.426 Operating transfers out (65.437~ Nel income (loss) $, 9.181.134 $ ~ 8.660 $ (83.5151 Currenl capilal contributions, nel $ 14.184.632 $ . $ Property. plant and equipmenl: Additions $ 56.121.271 $ $ 331.633 Deletions $ 132.698.946~ $ ~,, (5.381) $ Net working capital $ 65.097.533 $ 1.845.448 $ 422.895 Total assets $ 430.694.227 $ 3.963.197 $ 1.350.650 Total Iong-lerm liabilities $ 111.226.831 $ 182.315 $ 157.559 Total fund equity $ 306.691.038 $ 3.531.159 $ 1.162.938 43 Emergency Sohd Waste Medical A.rport Disposal Services Authority Totals $ 11,544,655 $ 4.583,327 $ 869,419 $ 55,233,932 275,736 223,712 95,884 9.168.448 12,309,644 8.12g,324 1.208,095 40,478,219 {1,040,725} (3,769.709) {434,5601 5.587.265 407,199 46.542 453,741 1,701,759 47.325 (135,1391 (206.024 661,034 13,722.384) (569,6991 5.381.241 4,211.470 4,370.896 11,000} (155.416) (221,S53) $ 661,034 $ 488.086 $ ~ $ 9,530,28.~_4 $ 6.26~g $ ~ $ 870,48~9 $ ...... 14,928,109 $ 494,g9~1 $ 12,780 $ 6,097,029 $ 63,057,70~4 $. (247,341) S (650,631} $ ~ $ ~ 18,756,613 $ 1,130,16~7 $ ~ $ 86,402,70~6 $ 28,g86,16.~_2 $. 2.467.954 $ 10.58,0,,,657, $ 478;042.847 $ 4,324,693 $ 321,84g$ 1,559,898 $ 117,773,145 $ 23,512,652 $ 2,01g,g07 $ 5,659,375 $ 342,577,069 44 CO,UE, COUNt'. 6 NOTES TO THE GENE.AL PU"POSE F,N^NC,A STATEME.TS NOTE 15 - OPERATING TRANSFERS Operating transfers for the year ended September 30. 1997 were as t'ollows: FUND Transfers in Transfers out General Fund $ 8.799.497 $ 18.802.536 Special Revenue Funds: Road Districts 4.943.494 62,792 Water Management and Pollution Control 30.831 763.350 Unincorporated Areas 319,927 7.783.588 Grants and Shared Revenues 289.040 139.912 Improvement Distncts 1.194,752 48.277 Miscellaneous Fee 53,019 40.395 Museum 305.800 Sheriff's Grants 636,012 Fire Control Districts 353.931 23.218 Public Guardianship 40,395 Lighting Districts 336,584 Tounst Development 110,762 1.937.189 8.277,963 11.135.305 Debt Service Funds: Parks General Obligation Refunding Bonds 32.101 Road and Other Improvements 4.281.673 3. I00.000 Marco Island General Obligation Bonds 25,932 Special Obligation Revenue Bonds 5,000 Stormwaler Improvement 54,100 Isle of Capn Renovalion Expansion 1.195 4.340.773 3,159.228 Capital Projects Funds: County.Wide Capital Improvements 2.768.200 Parks Improvements 196.157 County-Wide Library 25.119 Parks Impact Districts 1.477 51.527 Road Construction 1.453.972 Water Management 1,238.600 Other Capital projects 3.329.200 402.672 7.533.634 1.933.290 Enterprise Funds: County Water and Sewer 159,426 65.437 Emergency Medical Service 4,211.470 1,000 Airport Authority 155.416 4,370.896 221.853 Internal Service Funds: Information Technology 10.600 Office of Capital PrOjects Management 255,200 Department of Revenue 7.000 28.000 Fleet Management 9.000 105.000 26.600 388.200 Trust and Agency Funds: State Court Administration 3.020.500 164.539 Cnminal Justice 386.000 Confiscated Property 85.912 Utilfty Fee 93.000 3.020.500 729,451 Total $ 36.369,863 $ 36.369.863 45 co ,E. 6 8 ,. NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 16 - FUND EQUITY Contributed capital: Balances represent capital grants and contributions received from developers, customers and other governments or funds Retained Earnin,qs Enterprise funds - Reserved for revenue bond rebrement: Balances are reserved in conjunction with the issuance of County water and sewer, Marco water and sewer and Goodland water revenue bond issues. They have been funded by initial depostls from the bond proceeds and by transfers from the operating accounts of the appropriate funds, The use of monies in the sinking fund is restricted to the payment of principal and interest on long-term debl. Enterprise funds - Reserved for renewal and replacement: Balances are reserved in conjunction WTth the issuance of Counly water and sewer and Marco water and sewer revenue bond issues. They are funded by transfers from the operating accounts of the appropriate funds. The use of monies ~n the renewal and replacement fund is restricted to funding the cost of extensions, enlargements, additions and replacement or major repair of capital assets. Enterprise funds - Unreserved: Balances are not reserved for specific purposes. Internal service funds - Unreserved: Balances are not reserved for specific purposes. Fund Balances Reserved long-term receivable: Balances represent long-term loans made Io individuals which do not Reserved for Rotes constitute expendable and available financial resources. Reserved for encumbrances: Balances are segregated for expenditure upon vendor performance. Reserved for inventory: Balances represent ~tems which are not considered available and spendable resources Reserved for prepaid costs: Balances represent insurance, travel and other expenses paid in advance and wh,ch are not considered available and spendable resources. Reserved for debt service: Balances represent monies legally restricted to the payment of principal and ~nterest on long-term debt. Reserved for trust fund purposes~ Balances are reserved as legally mandated or as otherwise stipulated by a donor. Fund Balances Unreserved Designated for impact fees: Balances represent affordable housing impact fees deferred by the Board of County Commissioners to be funded by the County in the future. Designated for debt service: Balances are designated for the payment of principal and interest on long-term debt. Designated for future capital projects: Balances are designated for future capital project expenditures. Undesignated: Balances are not designated for specific purposes. 46 COLUERCOUNTY, FLORIDA (3 NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 17- RISK MANAGEMENT COUNTY'S SELF-INSURANCE The County is exposed to various risks of loss related to tort; theft of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees and natural disaslers. A self-insurance internal service fund is maintained by the County to administer insurance activities relating to workers' compensation, health and property and casualty, which covers general, property, auto, public official and crime liabilities. Under these programs, the self-insurance fund provides coverage up to a maximum amount for each claim. The County purchases commercial insurance for claims in excess of coverage provided by the self-insurance fund and for all other covered risks of loss. County's Excess Carrier's Claim Type Coverage Cove,age Property damage claims $100,000 each $100,000 - $5,000,000 Auto liabilily claims $100,000 each $100,000 - $1,000,000 Employee health claims $125,000 each $125,000 - $1,000,000 Workers' compensation claims $150,000 each $150,000 - $5,000,000 The aggregate loss exposure on workers' compensation and property and casualty claims is $1,240,000. Settled claims have not exceeded the insurance provided by third party carriers in any of the past three years. All divisions of the County, excluding the Sheriff, participate in this program. Charges to operating departments are based upon amounts believed by management to meet the required annual payouts during the fiscal year and to pay for the estimated operating costs of lhe programs. For the fiscal year enOed September 30. 1997 the operating departments were charged approximately $6,108,626 for workers' compensation, health and property and casualty self-insurance programs. The claims loss reserve for workers' compensation, health and property and casualty of $5,723,448 reported at September 30, 1997 was calculated by third party actuaries based upon GASB Statement 30, "Risk Financing Omnibus", which requires lhat a liability for claims be reported when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of that loss can be reasonably estimated. The estimated liabilities for unpaid losses related to workers' compensation and property and casualty were discounted at 4.5%. SHERIFF'S SELF-INSURANCE The Sheriff participates in the state-wide Florida Sheriff's Self-Insurance Fund for its professional liability insurance. The fund is managed by representatives of the participating Sheriff offices and provides professional liability insurance to participating Sheriff agencies. The Florida Sheriff's Self-Insurance Fund provides liability insurance coverage subject to the following limitations, $2,100,000 for any claim involving a single individual. $2,200,000 for any incident which involves multiple claims and aggregate, $2,300,000 ultimate net loss per Sheriff during any policy period. 47 COLL,ER COUNt, FLOR,DA B ' l NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE F'NANC'AI STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, lgg7 ,NOTE 17-R'SK MANAGEMENT-CONT'NUED SHERIFF'S SELF-INSURANCE - CONTINUED Effect,ve January 1, 1994, the Sheriff elected to parhcfpate mn the Florida Sheriff's Self-Insurance funct program for workers' compensation coverage The Florida SherIff's Association Workers' Compensation Insurance Trust (FSAWlT) is a limded self-insurance fund prowdlng coverage for the first S300,000 of every claim. Re-~nsurance is prowded through a third party insurer for all claims exceeding $300,000 up to $2,000,000. Prior to tn~s date the Sheriff was a part,cipant ~n Ihe county w~de self-~nsurance ~nternal service fund maintained by the Colher County Board of County Commissioners to adm~mster these insurance activities. Premiums charged to participating Sheriffs are based upon amounts believed by Fund management to meet the required annual payouts during the fiscal year and to pay for the estimated operabng costs of tha program. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 the Sheriff was charged approximately $1,155,370 for Ihe workers compensahon self-insurance program Coverago ~s provided on an occurrence basis. Aisc effective January 1. 1994, the Sheriff estabhshed a self-funded employee health plan. An internal serwce fund was eslabhshed to account for the act~wlies of Ihe plan. Excess coverage has been purchased which provides specific claim coverage for any one incident exceeding $125,000 up to S1,000,000 and aggregate limits coverage of S1,000,000 for total claims paid by the Sheriff which exceeds $3,742,989 for any coverage year Changes in the self-insurance claims payable for fiscal years 1996and 1997 were as follows for the County and Sheriff self-insurance programs: Property and Group Workers' Casualty Health Compensation Total Balance October 1. 1995 S 618.643 5 1.110,000 $ 3,561,374 S 5.290.017 Current year cia,ms incurred and changes ~n esbmates 499,494 6.498,351 1.588,094 8,585.939 Claim payments (238,075) (6,419,351) (1,516.391) (8,173,817) Balance September 30, 1996 880,062 1,189,000 3.633,077 5,702,139 Current year claims incurred and changes ~n estimates 1,113,267 7,198,799 1,963,319 10,275.385 Claim payments (360,581) (6,841,744) (2,214,751) (9,417.076) Balance September 30, 1997 S 1,632.748 S 1,546,055 $ 3,381,645 S 6,560.448 NOTE 18 - LANDFILL LIABILITY On May 1, 1995 the County entered into an agreement with a company for the privatization of the County's landfill operations. Under the contract, the company is responsible for the daily operations, capital improvements, closure, postclosure and financial assurance requirements of the Naples and Immokalee landfill sites, The County is responsible for staffing and operating the scale house at each site. Contract provisions provide the County with early termination options. Upon exercising early termination, the County would be required to make payments to the company for capital expenditures, management fees and additional operating fees. The County's estimated liability in connection with the landfills is included in the enterprise fund balance sheet, 48 COL.ER COUNW, FLOR,D^ 6 B TM l NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 19 - DEFICIT RETAINED EARNINGS The Airport Authority enterprise fund has a deficit retained earnings balance of ($812,771), and total fund equity of $5,659,375. NOTE 20 - SIGNIFICANT CONTINGENCIES LITIGATION The County is involved as defendant or plaintiff in certain litigation and claims arising in the ordinary course of operations. In the opinion of legal counsel, the range of potential recoveries or liabilities will not materially affect lhe financial position of the County. STATE~ AND FEDI~RAI~ GRANTS Granl monies received and disbursed by the County are for specific purposes and are subjecl to review by the granlor agencies. Such audits may result in requests for reimbursement due to disallowed expenditures. Based upon prior experience, the County does not believe that such disallowances, if any, would have a material effect on the financial position of the County. NOTE 21 - SIGNIFICANT COMMITMENTS CONSTRUCTION COMMITMENTS Expended as of Project September 30, Future Authorization 1997 Commitments Parks $ 1,478,807 $ 240,882 $ 1,237,925 Roads 31,021,315 27,813,953 3,207,362 Utilities 34,941,984 21,136,166 13,805,818 Landfill expansion and closure 874,322 505,690 368,632 Buildings 10,923,029 9,010,159 1,912,870 Airports 761,476 577,710 183,766 Beach restoration 5,523,527 3,537,779 1,985,748 Stormwater drainage 493,584 488,163 5,421 Total $ 86,018,044 $ 63,310,502 $ 22,707,542 ROAD AND REGIONAL PARK IMPACT FEE AGREEMENTS In the past, the County has acquired right-of-ways and received beach parking and road construction services from various developers in exchange for impact fee credits. Amounts granted for impact fee credits were based on the market value at the time the property, improvement or services were received. The developers, their successors or assignees may utilize the road impact fee credits for future development activities. No time limits are set for use of the credits. As the credits are consumed, impact fee revenue is recognized. At September 30, 1997 the County had outstanding regional park impact fee and road impact fee agreements with developers of $73,283 and $1,510,935, respectively. 49 [ I III IIIlll~lim ........................ 1----- I II I I mm co~t,. COUNTY. FLOR,DA 6 8 ~ Imm NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ' SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 22 - PRIOR-PERIOD ADJUSTMENT mm Pursuant to adopting GASB Slatement 31, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools", the difference between the carrying value of the investment portfolio and the fair value of the investments is shown as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings/fund balance. The fair value of the portfolio was arrived at through a matrix pricing scheme as calculated by the County's custodial bank, First Union National Bank. The adjustment resulted in an equity decrease across fund types of ($1,734,360). I I ! ! i 5O GENERAL FUND GENERAL FUND THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE GENERAL FUND IS TO ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF THE COUNTY'S OPERATING REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCIAL RESOURCES AND THEIR USES IN CONDUCTING THE GENERAL OPERATIONS OF THE COUNTY, EXCEPT FOR THOSE RESOURCES REQUIRED TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN ANOTHER FUND. THE GENERAL FUND HAS A GREATER NUMBER AND VARIETY OF REVENUE SOURCES THAN ANY OTHER FUND, AND ITS RESOURCES FINANCE A WIDER RANGE OF ACTIVITIES. THE RESOURCES OF THE GENERAL FUND ARE NORMALLY EXPENDED AND REPLENISHED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 Bud~let Actual Variance Revenues: Taxes $ 67.553.600 $ 65.282.321 $ (2.271.279) Licenses and permits 151.700 96,918 (54,782) Intergovernmental 20,313,289 21,693,825 1,380.536 Charges for services 10.188.821 9.947.080 (241,741 ) Fines and forfeitures 3.023.200 3,321,677 298.477 Interesl income 903.500 2,942,023 1,138.523 Miscellaneous 3,262,673 3.749,507 486.834 Total revenues 105.396.783 106.133.351 736,568 Expenditures: General government Legislative Board of County Commissioners 563.400 535.727 27.673 Executive County manager administrative 571.200 548.097 23.103 Financsal and admimstrative Budget and management 426.500 349.942 76.558 Administrative services 701.900 667.386 34.514 Human resources administration 488.200 468,017 20.183 Clerk to the board 2,715.525 2,291,414 424.111 Property appraiser 2,853.527 3,014,664 (161.137) Tax collector 4,036.369 4,047,285 (10.916) Legal counsel County attorney 1,368.420 1,104,707 263.713 Comprehensive planning Natural resources 627.200 569,923 57.277 Judicial Circuit court costs 396.700 314.947 81.753 Courtroom operations & maintenance 942.100 983.991 (41.891) County court cost 51,800 18.982 32,818 State attorney 246,100 223.996 22.194 Public de fender 221,085 189,158 31,927 Clerk to the courts 5,536,935 4.895.314 641.621 Other general government Other general administrat,ve 1,098,369 859,136 239.233 Facilities management 3,198,988 3,205,608 (6.620) Supervisor of elections 1.298,900 925,835 373.065 Real properly management 564.900 525,578 39.322 Total general government 27.908,118 25.739.707 2.168,411 51 STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE I BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL FUNO (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 Budget Actual Vadance I Publ,c safety Law enfo~cemenl Sheriff S 37.463.300 $ 36.938.257 $ 525.043 I Delention and/~ correction Sheriff 12.674.200 12.851.936 (177.736) Emergency and d,saster rescue services Emergency managemenl adm, nmstration 282.015 264.631 17.384 I Ambulance and rescue serv,ces Hehcopter 64 7,136 623.713 23,423 Medmcal examfner Medical examiner serwces 442,000 435,537 6,463 I Total pubhc safety 51.508.651 51,114.074 394,577 I Physical environment Conservation and resource management Agriculture administration 820.001 687,893 132.108 Aquatic plant control 1,056.383 1.031,336 25,047 I Other physical environment Immokalee cemetery 15.700 10.992 4.708 Total physical environment 1.892.064 1.730.221 161,863 I Economic environment Veterans serv,ces 183,300 173,665 9,635 Housing and urban ~mprovement 380,737 267,779 112.958 I 564.037 441.444 122.593 Human senaces I Hospitals Health Care Responsibility Act 69.000 33,720 35,280 Health Ammal control 494,110 480,719 13.391 I Health department 626.300 622.046 4.254 Mental health Mental health 710.400 710,400 Welfare I Clmnt assistance 2,706.500 2,588,092 118,408 Other human services Public services divisfon office 158.100 1 56.377 1.723 I Total human services 4.764,410 4,591.364 173.056 I (CONTINUED) Budcje! Actual Variance Culture and recreatton Libraries Library administration $ 2,808.746 $ 2,610,516 $ 198,230 Outreach serwces 144.500 130.551 13.949 Parks and recreabon acbvittes Parks and recreabon administration 4,031,173 3,882.620 148.553 Recreation programs 1.734.600 1,496.793 237,807 A~uatic faoltties 523,100 482.348 40.752 Museum 18.210 16,719 1.a91 Total culture and recreatton 9,260.329 8.619,547 640,782 Total expenditures 95.897.629 92.236.347 3.661,282 Excess of revenues over expenditures 9,499.154 13.897.004 4.397,850 Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers m 8.250.900 8.799.497 548,597 Operating transfers out (20,311.681 ) (18,802,536) 1.509.145 Total other financing sources (uses) (12.060.781) (10,003.039) 2057 742 Excess of revenues and omer finanong sources over (under) expendttures and other finanong uses (2,561.627) 3.893.965 6.455 592 Fund balance at beginning of year 8.692,433 16 022.494 7.330 061 Prior-period adlustment (see Note 22) (214.579! (214579) Fund balance as restated 8692 433 15.807.915 7.115.482 Fund balance at end of year S 6 130 ~0~ S 19.701 880 S 13.571.074 53 SPECIAL REVENUEFUNDS ROAD DISTRICTS - TO ACCOUNT FOR TAXES LEVIED AND EXPENDITURES TO CARRY ON ALL WORK ON ROADS AND BRIDGES IN THE COUNTY EXCEPT THAT PROVIDED FOR IN CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS. m WATER MANAGEMENT AND POLLUTION CONTROL - TO ACCOUNT FOR TAXES LEVIED COUNTY-WIDE TO PROVIDE WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL. I UNINCORPORATED AREAS - TO ACCOUNT FOR REVENUES DERIVED FROM AND EXPENDED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF THE COUNTY. m GRANTS AND SHARED REVENUES TO ACCOUNT FOR THE REVENUES RECEIVED FROM FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GRANTS. m SHERIFF'S GRANTS - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE REVENUES RECEIVED BY THE SHERIFF FROM FEDERAL. STATE AND LOCAL GRANTS i IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS - TO ACCOUNT FOR TAXES LEVIED WITHIN MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE FOR SPECIFIED IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR THE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS. I FIRE CONTROL DISTRICTS - TO ACCOUNT FOR TAXES LEVIED WITHIN MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING DISTRICTS FOR FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL. m MISCELLANEOUS FLORIDA STATUTES FEE COLLECTIONS - TO ACCOUNT FOR FEES COLLECTED FOR STATUTORY PURPOSES. MUSEUM - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAXES AND ADMISSION FEES m USED TO FUND THE OPERATION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY MUSEUM. LIGHTING DISTRICTS - TO ACCOUNT FOR TAXES LEVIED WITHIN MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING m DISTRICTS FOR STREET LIGHTING. 911 ENHANCEMENT FEE - TO ACCOUNT FOR FEES LEVIED ON EACH TELEPHONE ACCESS m LINE IN THE COUNTY FOR THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE 911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SYSTEM. PUBLIC RECORDS MODERNIZATION - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE STATUTORY SURCHARGE ON m RECORDING DOCUMENTS TO BE PAID TO THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF THE CLERK'S OFFICIAL RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. I PUBLIC GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM TO ACCOUNT FOR FILING FEES AND MATCHING GENERAL FUND TRANSFERS USED TO FUND SERVICES TO INDIGENT, HANDICAPPED ADULTS. m TOURIST DEVELOPMENT -TO ACCOUNT FOR THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX. STATE HOUSING INCENTIVE PARTNERSHIP - TO ACCOUNT FOR STATE REVENUES RECEIVED TO PROVIDE AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL HOUSING FOR VERY LOW TO MODERATE INCOME IPERSONS AND THOSE WHO HAVE SPECIAL HOUSING NEEDS. 800 MHZ IRCP FUND ACCOUNT TO ACCOUNT FOR MOVING TRAFFIC VIOLATION m SURCHARGES RECEIVED TO FUND THE COUNTY"S INTERGOVERNMENTAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMBINING BALANCE SHEET ALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Water Grants and Road Management and Unincorporated Shared Improvement Sheriff's Districts Po{lulion Control Areas Revenues Dtstricts Grants Cash and investments S 2.759.618 $ 1.688.793 $ 11.499.252 $ 500.111 $ 3.115.029 S Receivables: Interest 13.114 9.001 139.193 1.387 15.726 Notes 237.602 Other 142.533 44.917 243.978 7 286 Due from other funds 1.076 768 203.043 3.900 1.141 51.430 Due from other governments 280.881 15.239 294.154 397.637 Prepmd cost Totalassets S 3.197.222 $ 1.743.479 $ 12.100.705 $ 1.037.161 $ 3.132.182 S 449.067 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities: Vouchers payableandacc~uals S 374.761 S 75.048 S 216.049 $ 175.390 $ 68.709 S 29.354 Due to other funds 367 3.449 7.261 70.519 392.751 Due to other governments 375.046 868.182 3.572 28.834 Due to individuals 3.585 Deferred revenues 103.400 1.290.824 535.438 26.962 Retainage payable 2.700 2.385.901 784.919 97.543 449.067 Total liabihtles 375.128 559.643 Fund balances: Reserved for: Encumbrances 543 108,518 111,053 126,005 42.708 Prepaid costs Unreserved: Designated for: Impacl fees 104.109 Undesignated 2.821.551 1.075.318 9.499.642 126.237 2.991.931 Total fund balances 2.822.094 1.183.83~. 9.714.804 252.242 3.034.639 Total liabilitiesandfundbalances $ 3.197.222 $ 1.743.479 $ 12.100.705 $ 1.037.161 $ 3.132.182 $ 449.067 6 M,scellaneous 911 Pubhc Public Fire Control Florida Statutes Lighting Enhancement Records Guardianship Ois~ncts Fee Collections Museum Districts Fee Modem~zabon Pro, ram $ 150.923 S 22,384 S 37.147 S 606.210 S 663.338 $ 1.091.623 $ 27.625 1.303 148 227 3.249 2,982 3,517 866 1.235 915 $ 156.6.___~_~$ 23.76__75 37.37__45 ....... 610.374 $ 666.320 S 1,091,62__35 27,625 $ 6,253 $ 4.250 $ 14,259 $ 52,566 $ $ $ 19,897 229,317 6,253 4,250 14.259 52.566 229,317 19.897 1.290 o 150.356 18,227 23.115 557.808 437,003 1.091,623 7.728 150,356 19.517 23.115 557,808 437,003 1,091,623 7,728 $ 156.609 $ 23.767 S 37.374 S 610.374 $ 666,320 S 1,091,623 $ 27~25 (CONTINUED) 55 COMBINING BAL.AHCE SHEET ALL SPECIAL. REVENUE FUNDS (CONTINUED) SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Slate Housing 800 MHZ Tour,st Incentive IRCP Fund Development Partnershq3 Account Total ASSETS Cash and~nvestments S 11.238,339 $ 241,632 S 592,012 S 34,234.036 Recewables: Interest 54,666 1.204 2,700 244,900 Notes 237.602 Omer 1.964 437.202 Due from olher funds 395,515 4,572 22,495 68;3.956 Due from olher governmenls 200,970 I. 18P.881 Prepmd cOsl 2,500 2.500 total assets $ 11.688.520 $ 450,342 $ 619.707 S 37,032.077 Lmbilities: Vouchers payable and accruals S 808,340 S 3,031 S 1,893 $ 1.849.800 Due to other funds 703.664 Due to other governments 1.275.634 Due to indiwduals 3,585 Deferred revenues 1.964 1.958,588 Retainage payable 23,742 26442 Total liabilities 832,082 4.995 1,893 5.817.713 Fund balances: Reserved for: Encumbrances 4.467.955 73.706 4.931.778 Prepmd COSlS 2.500 2,500 Unreserved: Designated for: Impact fees 259,024 - 363.133 Undesignated 6.388.483 186.323 541.608 25,916.953 Total fund balances 10.856.438 445.347 617.814 31.214,364 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 11.688,520 $ 450.342 $ 619.707 $ 37.032.077 56 [ II IIIII -I II IIIIII I III ..................... COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA v ..,, COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES. EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES ALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Water Grants and Road Management and Umncorporaled Shared Improvement Shenff's Distr~cts Pollution Control Areas Revenues D, stricts Grants Revenues: Taxes $ 3,177.612 $ 856.766 $ 8.782,788 $ $ 1.169,345 $ Licenses and permits 22,025 35.325 7.257,786 Intergovernmental 1.417,345 293,923 1.327,464 3,119,327 Charges for serwces 172.648 232,550 1,041.483 127,891 Fines and forfeitures 101,217 Interest income 151,310 120,163 787,989 14.816 210.939 Speoal assessments 1.328,670 122,866 Miscellaneous 213.602 5.973 176,127 26.076 14,q35 Total revenues 5 154,742 2,873.372 18.147,390,,. 1,368.356 1,645,076 3.119.327 Expenditures: Current: General government 16,555 2,882,587 257,383 Public safely 5,195.937 69.025 3.755.339 PhysicaJ environment 2,425.825 288.361 26.849 1.260,389 Transporlatio~n 10.214.072 110.428 53.812 140.234 Economic environment 7.859 17.731 Human serwces 792.359 Culture and recreahon 1.331,305 202.2:20 653.174 Total expenditures 10.214.072 2.552,808 9.706.049 1.419.379 2,053.797 3.755,3:39 Excess of revenues over (under) expeod~tures (5.059.330) 320.564 8.441.34 1 (51,023) (408.721 ) (636.012) Other financing sources luses) Proceeds from capital leases 1,550.945 Operating transfers ~n 4.943,494 30,831 319,927 289.040 1,194,752 636,012 Operating transfers out (62,792) (763,350) (7.783,588) (139.912) (48,277) Total olher finanong sources (uses) 6.431.547 (732,519} (7.463,661~, 149.128 1,146,475 636,012 Excess of revenues and olher financ- ing SOurceS over (under) expen- ditures and other finanong (uses) 1.372.317 (411.955) 977.680 98.105 737,7.54 Fund balances at I:)eg~nmng of year 1,468.623 1.616.355 8.825.626 1 54,472 2.319,244 Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22 ) (18,646) (20.564) (88.502) (335) (22,359) Fund balances as restated 1,449,777 1,595.791 8.737,124 154.137 2.296,885 Fund balances at en(~ of year 5 2.822,094 S 1.183.836 S 9.714.804 $ 252.242 S 3,034.639 $ (CONTINUED) 57 [ [ iii[Iii[ I I Il I IIll I I Ill I Il [ Il 11 Il I I [ Il Il [ I I Illl [ Ill Ill II COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES ALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Miscellaneous 911 Public Fire Control Florida Statutes Lighting Enhancement Records Districts Fee Collections Museum Districts Fee Modem~zabon Revenues* Taxes $ 662,052 $ $ S 1.206,562 S 747.865 S Licenses and permits Intergovernmental 4 50 Charges fo~ services 3.770 203.387 Fines and forfeitures 13.827 Interest income 24.574 1.220 3.202 46,849 31.977 Special assessments M~scellaneous 5.980 59.732 59.065 Total revenues 696.826 15.047 3,202 1.313.143 779.",42 262.452 Expenditures Current. General govemmenl 23,793 27.694 Public safely 1.074.562 671.269 Physical enwronrnent Transportation 777.190 Economic environment Human services Culture and recreation 285,887 Total expenditures 1.074.562 23.793 285.887, 777.190 671.269 27.694 Excess of revenues over (under) ex pend~tures (377.736) (8.746) (282.685) 535.953 108.573 234.758 Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds from capital leases Operating transfers ~n 353.931 53.019 305.800 Operating transfers out (23.218) (40,395) (336,584) Total other financing sources (uses) 330.713 12.624 305.800 (336.584) Excess of revenues and other financ- ing sources over (under) expert. d~tures and other financing (uses) (47.023) 3.878 23,115 199.369 108.573 234.758 Fund balances at beginn*ng of year 200.831 16,182 363.469 331.728 856,865 Pn(x,-penod adjustment (see Note 22) (3.452) (543) (5.030.) (3.298) 197.379 15.63c' 358.439 328.430 856.865 Fund balances as restated Fund balances at end of year $ 150.356 S 19.517 $ 23.115 S 557.808 S 437.003 S 1.091.623 58 Pubhc Slate Housing 800 MHZ Guardtansh~p Toudsl Incentive IRCP Fund Pro, ram Developmen! Partnership Account Total $ 7,245.870 S S S 23.848.862 7.315,136 1.101.806 7.260,315 20.942 2,167 4.572 239,740 2,049,350 115,044 672.104 11,373 30.132 2.106.648 1.451.536 2 288 2,062 564.940 23.230 7.922,203 1.117.751 269,872 44.711,831 79.868 3,287,880 92.312 10,858.444 3,039.298 7.040.722 11.295.736 1,021.390 1.046.980 792,359 3.356,264 5,828.850 79,868 6.395.562 1.021.390 92,312 40.150,971 { 56.638) 1. 526.64 1 96.361 177. 560 4. 560.860 1.550.945 40,395 110,762 8,277,963 11.937.189t t11,135.3051 40.395 (1.826,427) {1,306.397~ (16.243) (299,786) 96.361 177.560 3.254.463 11.275.296 351,918 443.524 28.224.133 23.971 ( 119.072t (2,932) 13.270) (264.232) 1 348.986 440.254 27.959.901 23.971 1.156.224 7.728 S 10.856,438 $ 445,347 S 617.814 $ 31,214.364 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL SPECIAL. REVENUE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Road D~stncts Water Manac~emenl and Pollution Control INon-GAAP1 Actual Variance Budc~et Actual Vanance Budget Revenues: Taxes $ 3.329.700 $ 3.177.612 S (152.088) $ 886.900 S 856.768 $ (30.132) Licenses and permits 15.000 22.025 7,025 35,300 35.325 25 Intergovernmental 1.234.400 1 417.34 § 182,945 1.189.814 397.323 ( 792,491 ) Charges for semces 42,500 172.848 130.348 253,600 232.550 (21.050) Fines and forfeitures Interest income 3;'.800 151,310 113.510 111.300 120.163 8.863 Special assessments 1,366,500 1.328.b70 (37,830) Miscellaneous 213,602 213.602 5,973 5.973 Total revenues 4.659,400 5154.742 495,342 3.843,414 2.976.772 (866.642) Expenditures: Current: General government 45.000 16.555 28.445 Pubhc safety Physical environment 3.693.803 2.425.825 1,267.978 Transpod, abon 11.397,134 10,214,072 1,183,062 117.800 110.428 7,372 Economic enwronment Human serwces Culture and recreation Debt Semce: PnncJpal Inleresl and fiscal charges Total expenditures 11.397.134 10,214,072 1,183,062 3,856,603 2,552.808 1,303,795 Excess of revenues over (under) expendllures (6.737.7341 (5,059,330) 1,678,404 {13.189) 423,964 437,153 Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds from capital leases 1,550.945 1.550.945 Operating transfers ~n 5,017.600 4.943,494 (74.106) 47,500 30.831 (16.669) Operating Iransfers out (146.900) (62.792) 84,108 (795.100) (763.350j 31.750 Total other financing sources (uses) 6.421.645 6.431.647 10,002 (747.600) (732.519) 15,081 Excess of revenues and other t~nanc- ing sources over (under) expen- ditures and other financing (uses) (316.089) 1,372.317 1.688.406 (760.789) (308.555) 452.234 Fund balances al beginning of year 719.189 1.468.623 749.434 1.371.389 2.146.012 774.623 Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (18,846) (18,846) (20.564) (20.564) Fund balances as restated 719.189 1.449.777 730,588 1.371.389 2.125.448 754.059 Fund balances at end of year $ 403.100 $ 2.822,094 $ 2,418.994 $ 610.600 $ 1.816.893 $ 1,206.293 I Umncon~aled Areas (Non-GAAP1 Grants and Shared Revenues I Budc~et Actual Variance Budc~et Aclual Variance I $ 9.042.100 $ 8.782.788 S (259.312) S $ 6,027.200 7.608.294 1.581.094 3.918,351 1,327,464 (2,590,887) 740,200 1.041,483 301,283 i 46.500 101,217 54,717 393,000 787,989 394,989 7,000 14.816 7.816 28.608 176.127 147,519 9,538 26,076 16,538 I 16.277.608 18.497,898 2.220,290 3,934.889 1.368,356 I2.566.533) I 3.187.388 2.882.587 304,801 668,344 257.383 410.961 5.590,598 5,195.937 394.661 1,534,068 69,025 1.465,043 i 288.361 288.361 27,400 26,849 551 100,000 53,812 46,188 23,678 7,859 15,819 750,000 17,731 732,269 1,114,358 792,359 321,999 i 1.553.700 1.331.305 222.395 245.500 202,220 43.280 I 10,643.725 9.706.049 937.676 4,439.670 1,419,379 3.020.291 I 5.633.883 8.791,849 3,157.966 (504,7811 (51.023) 453,758 I 911,300 942,227 30.927 373.610 289.040 (84.570) (8.417.900) (8,405,888) 12.012 (54.0001 (139.912] (85,912) I (7,506,600) (7,463,661) 42,939 319,610 149,128 (170,482) I ( 1. 872.717 ) 1. 328.188 3. 200. 905 ( 185.171 ) 98,105 283,276 7,727.686 9,467,205 1,739,519 270,295 154,472 (115.823) (88.502) (88.502) (335) (335) I 7,727.686 9,378.703 1,651,017 270,295 154,137 (116,158) $ 5,854.969 S 10.706.891 $ 4.851,922 S 85.124 $ 252,242$ 167,118 I (CONTINUED) I COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (BUDGETARY BASIS) · ALL SPECIAL. REVENUE FUNDS (CONTINUED) I FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Improvement Districts (Non. GAAP) Fire Control Districts I Budget Actual Vadance Budget Actual Variance I Revenues~ Taxes $ 1,210.200 $ 1.169.345 $ (40.855) S 691.900 $ 662.052 $ (29.848) · Licenses and permits Intergovernmental 600 450 { 150) Charges I~ services 110.300 127.891 17,591 1,700 3.770 2,070 Frees and fodeltures · Interesl income 123,417 210.939 87.522 10.400 24.574 14.174 I Special assessments 128.500 122,866 (5,634) Miscellaneous 11,151 14,035 2.884 5,980 5,~..80 Total revenues 1,583,568 1,645.076 61.508 710.580 696826 (13,754) I Expenditures: I Current: General government Public safely - 1,093,100 1,074.5F.2 18,538 Physical environment 1.424.774 1,260,389 164,385 · Transportation 640.789 140.234 500,555 I Economic environment Human services Culture and reo'eat~on 701,685 653.174 48.511 · Debt Semce: Pnncfpal 20.000 20.000 Interesl and fiscal charges 1,800 1,800 Total expenditures 2.789.048 2,053,797 735,251 1,093,100 1.074,562 18.538 I Excess of revenues over (under) expendftures (1.205.480] I408.721 ) 796,759 {382,520t (377,736) 4,764 I Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds from capital leases Operating transfers in 1,203,300 1.194.752 (8,548) 458,100 353.931 (104.169) Operating transfers out (66.600) t48,277) 18,323 {133,100~ (23,218) 109.882 Total other financing sources (uses) 1,136.700 1.146,475 9,775 325.000 330,713 5.713 · II Excess of revenues and other f~nanc- lng sources over (under) expen- ditures and other finanOng (uses) (68,780) 737,754 806.534 (57.520) (47.023) 10,497 · Fund balances at beginning of year 2.195,191 2.310,044 114.853 144.100 200.831 56.731 Prior.period adjustment (see Note 22) 122.359) (22.359) (3.452) (3.452) Fund balances as restated 2.195.191 2.287.685 92.494 144.100 197,379 53.279 I Fund balances at end of year S 2.126,411 S 3,025,439 $ 899,028 $ 86.580 S 150.356 S 63.776 I I I M,scellafleous FlOflda Statutes Fee Collect;o~s Museum I Budge! Actual Variance Bu(/~le! Actual Vanaflce IS S S S S $ 30,80O (30.80O) I 10.700 13,827 3,127 400 1.220 820 3,202 3,202 I 41,900 15,047 (26.853) 3,202 3,202 I 25,475 23.793 1.682 I I 295,200 285,887 9.313 25475 23,793 1,682 295.200 285,887 9,313 16,425 (8,7461 (25,171) (295,200) {282,685) 12.515 53.019 53.019 305,800 305,800 (82.319) (40.395) 41.924 (29.300) 12.624 41.924 305.800 305.800 (12.875) 3.878 16.753 10,600 23.115 12.515 13,175 16,182 3.007 (543~ (543) 13.175 15,639 2,464 300 S 19.517 $ 19,217 $ 10.600 $ 23,115 S 12,515 (CONTINUED) COLLIER COUNTY,, FLORIDA COMBINING SCNEOULE OF REVENUES, EXPENOITURES ,IJ'dO CH.N~IGES IN FUNO BN. ANCES BUDOET .~U~IO ACTUAL (BUOOETAR¥ B~IS) ALI.. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNOS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 L~hl,n~l D~stncts 911 Enhancement Fc.e Actual Vanance Budc, let Actual Vanance Budc~el Revenues: Taxes $ 1.250.000 S 1.206,562 $ (43,438) $ 732,600 S 747.865 S 15.265 Lfcenses and permits Inlergovernmental Charges for serwces Ffnes and forfeitures Interest ~ncome 14.200 46.84;* 32,649 6.000 31 .c.,77 25.977 Special assessments M~scellaneous 59.732 59.732 Total revenues 1.264.200 1.313.143 48,943 738.600 779.642 41.242 Expenditures Current: General government Pul~lic sa fety 687.400 671.269 16.131 Physical enwronment Transportation 918,800 777,190 141,610 Economic environment Human serwces Culture and recreation Debt Servtce: Pnnc~pal Interest and f~scal charges Total expenditures 918.800 777.190 141.610 687.400 671.269 16.131 Excess of revenues over (under) expend~lures 345.400 535.953 190.553 51.200 108.573 57.373 Other financing sources (uses) Proceeds from C~pftal leases Operating transfers ~n Operating transfers out (349.250) (336.5&~) 12,666 Total other financing sources (uses) (349.250) (336.584) 12,666 Excess of revenues and other flnanc* ~ng sources over (under) expen- ditures and other financing (uses) (3,850) 199.369 203,219 51.200 108,573 57.373 Fund balances at beginning of year 232.500 363,469 130,969 336,800 331.728 (5.072) Pnor-penod adlustment (see Note 22) (5.030) (5.030) (3.298) (3.298) Fund balances as restated 232.500 358.439 125,939 336,800 328.430 18.370) Fund balances alend of year S 228.650 $ 557.808 $ 329,158 S 388,000 $ 437,003 S 49.003 Pubhc Records Modem~zabon Tourist Development m Budget Actual Variance Budc, let Actual Variance m $ s s $ 6,227.000 s 7,245,870 $ 1.018.870 200,000 203.387 3.387 2,167 2,167 m 325.800 672,104 346,304 50.000 59.065 9,065 2,062 2,062 m 250.000 262.452 12.452 6.552.800 7.922.203 1.369.403 m 800.000 27.694 772.306 m 5.793.902 3.039.298 2.754.604 m 6.153.740 3.356.264 2.797.476 m 800.000 27.694 772.306 11.947.642 6.395.562 5.552.080 m {550.000) 234.758 784.758 (5.394.8421,' 1.526.641 6.921.483 m 110.762 110,762 (1,958.700) (1,937,189) 21,511 m (1,958.700) (1,826,427) 132,273 234.758 784.758 (7.353,542) (299,786) 7.053,756 (550.000) 550.000 858.865 306.865 11,532,628 11,275,296 (257,332) (119.072) (119.072) 550.000 858.865 306.865 11.532.628 11.156.224 f376.404) S 1.091.623 $ 1.091.623 $ 4.179.086 $ 10.858.43~8 $ 6.677.352, (CONTINUED) ~5 COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 State Hous~nc,,I Incenbve Partnership 800 MHZ IRCP Fund Account Budget Actual Variance Budc. let Actu.31 Variance Revenues Taxes S S S S S $ L,censes and perm,ts - Intergovernmental 1,035.200 1.101.806 66,606 Charges fo~ serwces 4,572 4,572 185.000 239,740 54.740 Frees and fode~tures Interest ~ncome 11,373 11,373 20,500 30.132 9,632 SPecial assessments Miscellaneous Total revenues 1,035,200 1,117,751 82,551 205,500 269,872 64,372 Expenditures: Current C~eneral governmenl Public safely 204,406 92.312 112,094 PhysiCal environmenl Transportation E conom~c environment 1.088.555 1.021.390 67,165 Human services Culture and recreabon Debl Serwce: Pnnopal Interest and I~scal charges Total expenditures 1,088.555 1,021.390 67.165 204.406 92.312 112.094 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures (53,3551 96.361 149,716 1,094 177,560 176.466 Olher financing sources (uses): Proceeds from capital leases Operatmng transfers in Operahng transfers ou! - Total other financing sources (uses) Excess of revenues and other financ- ing sourCes over (under) expen- ditures and other financing (uses) (53,355) 96,361 149.716 1,094 177,560 176466 Fund balances at beginning of year 280,755 351,918 71,163 436,606 443.524 6.918 Prior.period adjustment (see Note 22) (2,932) (2,932) (3,27C) (3,270) Fund balanCes as restated 280,755 348,986 68,231 436.606 440.254 3,648 Fund balancesatendofyear $ 227,400 $ 445,347 $ 217,947 $ 437,700 $ 617.814 $ 180,114 66 I Total I Budc. let Actual Variance m $ 23,370.400 $ 23,848,862 S 478,462 6,077.500 7.665,644 1,588,144 7,378.365 4.244.388 {3,133.977 ) m 1.504,100 2,028.408 464.308 57,200 115.044 57,844 1,049,817 2.106.648 1,056,831 1,495.000 1.451,536 (43,464) I 105,277 562.652 457,375 41,097.659 42.023,182 925.523 ! 4.726,207 3,208.012 1,.~18.195 I 9.109,572 7,103.105 2.006.467 11.228,240 7,040.722 4,187,518 13,174,523 11,295.736 1.878,787 1,862.233 1.046.980 815.253 I 1.114.358 792,359 321,999 8,949.825 5,828,850 3,120,975 20,000 20,000 i 1.800 1.800 50,186.758 36.315,764 13,870.994 I 19,089.099~ 5.707,418 14,796,517 I 1.550.945 1,550.945 8,370.229 8.223.856 (146.373) {12,003,869) (11,757,605) 246.264 I (2,082.6951 (1.982,804} 99.891 i (11.171.794) 3.724,614 14.896,408 25,810.314 29.386,169 3,575.855 i (288,203) (288.203~ 25,810.314 29,097,966 3,287.652 i $ 14.638,520 S 32.822.580 $ 18.184.050 DEBT SERVICEFUNDS PARKS GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON LONG-TERM DEBT INCURRED IN THE REFUNDING OF THE 1986 PARKS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS. RACE TRACK REVENUE CERTIFICATES - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON LONG-TERM DEBT OF CERTAIN CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDING THE EXPANSION OF THE COLLIER GOVERNMENT CENTER. GUARANTEED ENTITLEMENT REVENUE BONDS - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON LONG-TERM DEBT INCURRED IN THE REFUNDING OF THE 1977 GUARANTEED ENTITLEMENT REVENUE BONDS AND NEW CAPITAL PROJECTS GAS TAX REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULAT!ON OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON LONG-TERM DEBT INCURRED IN THE REFUNDING OF THE 1986 ROAD IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS. MARCO ISLAND LIMITED GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON LONG- TERM DEBT INCURRED FOR BEACH RENOURISHMENT ON MARCO ISLAND SALES TAX REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON LONG-TERM DEBT INCURRED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COURTHOUSE EXPANSION AND THE PARTIAL REFUNDING OF THE 1985 REFUNDING SALES TAX BONDS. ROAD AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON THE COMMERCIAL PAPER LOAN PROGRAM SPECIAL OBLIGATION REVENUE BONDS - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON LONG-TERM DEBT INCURRED TO PURCHASE LAND AND CONSTRUCT PARKING FACILITIES. SPECIAL OBLIGATION REVENUE BONDS SERIES 1997 TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON LONG- TERM DEBT INCURRED IN THE REFUNDING OF THE COMMERCIAL PAPER LOANS. EUCLID AND LAKELAND ASSESSMENT - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON LONG-TERM DEBT INCURRED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADSIDE IMPROVEMENTS. ISLE OF CAPRI RENOVATIONS AND EXPANSION - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON LONG-TEEM DEBT INCURRED IN THE RENOVATION OF BUILDINGS. STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT BONDS - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES FOR AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON LONG- TERM DEBT INCURRED IN THE REFUNDING OF THE COMMERCIAL PAPER LOANS. COMBININ~ BALANCE SHEET ALL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30, '1997 Parks General Guaranteed Gas Tax Obl~gal~on Race Track Enbllement Revenue Marco Island Sales Tax Refund~n§ Revenue Revenue Refunding L~m~ted General Revenue Bonds Certificates Bonds Bonds Obli~lal~on Bonds Refund~n~l Bonds Cash andinvestments S 55.695 S 412.652 S 360,658 $ 606.785 S 30.688 $ 6,490164 Recewables: S;~ec~al assessments Interest 719 2,148 1,706 2,981 534 30.342 Due from other funds 855 489 Due trom other govemmenls Total assets $ 57,269 S 414,800 S 362.364 $ 609.766 S 31.711 S 6.520.506 Liabilities: Vouchers payable and accruals S $ $ S $ S 352 Deferred revenues Total liabiht~es 352 Fund balances: Reserved for: Debl service 378.000 362.364 554.380 3.630.029 Unreserved: Designated for debt service 57.269 36,800 55.386 31.711 2 890 125 Total fund balances 57,269 414,800 362.364 609.766 31.711 6.520.154 Total flabilibes and fund balances $ 57,269 $ 414,800 S 362,364 S 609.766 $ 31.711 $ 6 520.506 SI3eoal Sl~ec~al Ston'nwater Road and Obt~gabon Obligation Euclid and Isle of Ceph Improvement Other Revenue Revenue Bonds Lakeland Renovations Assessment Improvements Bonds Ser~es 1997 Assessment And Expansion Bonds Total 1,886 $ 17.030 $ 1,266.060 S 44.999 $ 4.219 $ 52.293 $ 9.343.129 5,025 1.847,062 1.852.087 675 34 5.395 212 19 122,541 167,312 21 1.3.=,5 12.599 12,.~,99 15,160 $ 17,064 $ 1.271.455 S 50.236 S 4,259 $ 2.021.902 $ 11,376.492 I S $ S 19.932 S S $ 18.142 S 38.426 1.847.062 1,847.062 I 19.932 1.865.204 1.885.488 I 17,064 1,251.523 50,236 6.243.596 I 15,160 4,259 156.698 3.247.408 15.160 17,064 1,251.523 50.236 4.259 156.698 9.491,004 I $ 15.160 S 17,064 $ 1.271,455 $ 50.236 $ 4,259 $ 2,021,902 S 11.376.492 I I I 69 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES ALL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 I Parks General Race Guaranteed Gas Tax ~ Obhgat~on Track Enbtlemenl Revenue Marco Island Sales Tax Refundm.3 Revenue Revenue Refunding L~mited General Revenue Bonds Certificates Bonds Bonds Obl~c~at~on Bonds Refund~nc~ Bonds ~ lib Revenues: Taxes $ 829478 $ S $ 454.700 $ 678.318 S Intergovernmental 332 000 327.300 3.129.500 ~ Interesl income 27.815 33.062 21,493 45,242 20.360 405.640 SpeCial assessments Total revenues 857 293 365,062 348,793 '499.942 698.678 3 53.5.140 I · Expenditures Debl serwce Pnnopal retirement 630.000 250,000 175.000 290,000 §10.000 265.000 Interest anti fiscal charges 203.40.5 125485 93.203 261,765 163.202 2 065006 Total expenditures 833.405 375.485 268.203 551,765 673,202 2,330006 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures 23.888 (10,423) 80,590 (51.823) 2.5.476 1.205.134 Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds from refunding bonds Proceeds from loans Payments Io refund loans Operating transfers in Operating transfers out (32.101 ) ~'25,932) Total other f~nancmg sources (uses) (32,101 ) (25.932) Excess of revenues and other financ- ing sources over (under) expen- ditures and other financing (uses) (8,213) (10.423) 80.590 (51,823) (456) 1.205.134 Fund balances at beginning ot year 65.924 429,419 286,041 667.635 34.796 5.359,093 Prior.period adjustment (see Note 22) (442) (4,196) (4,2671 (6,046) (2.629) (44.073) Fund balances as restated 65.482 425.223 281.774 661.589 32.167 5.315.020 Fund balances at end of year S 57,269 S 414,800 $ 362.364 S 609,766 $ 31.711 $ 6.520.154 I Sl:)eoal Speoal Stormwater ObhgabOn Obhgatlon Euchd and Isle of Cal~n Heal~ Improvement i Road end Other Revenue Revenue Bonds Lakeland Reflovat.3ns Del3arfment Assessment Improvements Bonds Series 1997 Assessmenl And Expansion Com~uter Bonds Total I S S 5 $ S 28.565 $ $ - S 1.991.061 38.806 3.827.606 20.441 11.761 18.435 2.739 608 1.413 131.263 740.272 1.227.335 '~ .227.335 I 20.441 11.761 18.435 2.739 29.173 40.219 1.358.598 7.786.274 I 3,810.000 22.929 99,875 6.052.804 755.215 249.912 6,826 4.465 26.000 3.954.484 I 4,565,215 249.912 29,755 104,340 26.000 10.007.288 I (4,544,774) 11.761 (231,477) 2,739 {582) (64,121) 1.332,598 (2.221.014). I 13,000.000 1.870,000 14.870.000 3,100.000 3.100,000 (11,517,000) (3,100,000) (14,617,000) I 4,281,673 5,000 54,100 4,340,773 {3,100,000) (1.195) (3.159.228) I 4,281.673 5,000 (1.195) {1,175,900) 1 4,534.545 I (263.101) 16,761 1.251,523 2,739 (1.777) (64,121) 156,698 2.313,531 278,261 667 47,854 6.137 64.121 7.239.~48 m {364) i357) (101) (62.475) 278.261 303 47,497 6.036 64.121 7.177.473 m s 15.160 $ 17,064 s 1.251,523 s 50.236 s 4.259 $ s 156.698 s 9,491.004 COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AHD CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL, (GAAP BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Pa~s Genefa~ O~l,.cabon Refund,n~ Bonds Race Track Revenue CertJficates Budc)et Actual Var,ance Budc. let Actual Var,ance Revenues: Taxes S 857.500 $ 829478 $ (28.022) S 5 Intergovernmental 332.000 332.000 Interest income 3.500 27.815 24.315 19.000 33.062 14.062 Speoal assessment Total revenues 861.000 857293 (3,707) 351.000 365.062 14.062 ExpendJtuces: Debt service: PrinCipal ret~remen! 630,000 630.000 250,000 250.000 Inlerest and fiscal charges 237.400 203.405 33.995 125.600 125,485 115 Total expenditures 867,400 833405 33.995 375.600 375.485 115 Excess of revenues over (under) expendilures (6.400) 23.888 30.288 (24.600) ( 10.423 ) 14.177 Other flnanong sources (uses): Proceeds from refund,rig bonds Proceeds from loans Payments to refund loans Operating transfers m Operating transfers out (32.101 ) (32,101 ) Total other financing sources (uses) (32,1011 (32.101) Excess of revenues and other financ- ing sources over (under) expert* ditures and other financing (uses) (6,400) (8.213) (1,813) (24,600) (10.423) 14.17'7 Fund balances al beg~nmng of year 6.400 65,924 59,524 402,800 429.419 26.619 Pr,or.period adlustment (see Nole 22) (442) (442) (4.196) (4.196) Fund balance as restated 6,400 65.482 59.082 402.800 425.223 22,423 Fur~d balances at end of year $ $ 57.269 $ 57.269 $ 378.200 $ 414.800 $ 36.600 72 Illl - I I Il Illl Il Il Ill Illlll I Il Il I I I ................ Illl i[l[ll[[l[[[[[[[nnn~[[ [[ [ ,[ , [1 I I Guaranleed Ent,tlement Revenue Bonds Gas Tax Revenue Refundm~ Bonds I Budgie! Actual Vaflance Bu(~(~e! Actual Variance I $ $ $ S 454.700 $ 454,700 S 327.300 327.300 17.000 21.493 4,493 28.000 45,242 17,242 I 344.300 348,793 4,493 482,700 499,942 17,242 I 17.5.000 176,000 290.000 290.000 I 93.300 93,203 97 261.800 261,765 35 268.300 268.203 97 551.800 551.765 35 I 76.000 80,590 4,590 (69.100) (51,823) 17.277 76,000 80,590 4,590 {69.100) (51.823) 17.277 265.300 286.041 20.741 625.300 667.635 42,335 {4,267t {4,267) {6,046~ {6,046) 265,300 281.774 16.474 625.300 661.589 36,289 341.300 $ 362.364 S 21,064 S 556,200 $ 609,766 $ 53.566 (CONTINUED) 73 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (GAAP BUDGETARY BASIS) A/.L DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR TIlE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Marco Island Limited General Obh~lation Bonds Sales Tax Revenue Refundin~ Bonds Bud~et Actual Variance Budget Actual Variance Revenues: Taxes $ 707.300 $ 678,318 $ (28,982) $ $ $ Intergovernmental 3,129,500 3.129.500 Interest income 8.000 20.360 12,360 200,000 405.640 205,640 Speoal assessments To~al revenues 715.300 698.678 !16.622) 3.329.500 3.535,140 205.640 Expenditures; Debt serwce: Principal ret~remenl 510.000 510.000 265.000 265,000 Interest and fiscal charges 163,400 163.202 198 2,086.500 2.065,006 21.494 Total expendffures 673.400 673.202 198 2,351.500 2.330.006 21,494 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures 41.900 25.476 (16.424~ 978.000 1,205.134 227.134 Other financing sources (uses) Proceeds from refunding bonds Proceeds from loans Payments to refund loans Operating Iransfers in Operating transfers out (26.500) (25.932~ 568 Total other financ, mg sources (uses) (26.500) (25.932) 568 Excess of revenues and other financ- ing sources over (under) expen- ditures and other financing (uses} 15.400 (456) (15.856) 978.000 1.205.134 227.134 Fund balances at beginning of year (15.400) 34.796 50.196 5,041.900 5.359.093 317.193 Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) 12.629t (2,629) (44.073) (44.073) Fund balance as restated (15.400t 32.167 47.567 5.041,900 5.315.020 273.120 Fund balances at end of year S $ 31,711 $ 31,711 S 6.019,900 $ 6,520.154 $ 500,254 74 Road and Other Improvements Special Obi,gallon Revenue Bonds Budge! Aclual Var, ance Budge! Aclual Vanance S S $ S S 20.441 20.441 11.761 11.761 20.4,41 20,441 11,761 11.761 4 , 0 60, 000 3,610,000 260.000 1.114,000 755.215 359,$65 5.000 5,000 5.174,000 4.565.215 609,665 5.000 5.000 (5.174.9001 {4,544. 774 ) 630,126 {5,000 } 11,761 16.761 3,365,000 3.100,000 (265,000) 5,174,900 4,281,673 (893,227) 5.000 5.000 {3.365,000) 13.100,000) 265,000 5,174,900 4,281.673 (893,227) 5,000 5,000 (263,101) (263,101) 16,761 16,761 278,261 278,261 667 667 (364~ (364) 278,261 278,261 303 303 $ 15,160 $ 15,160 $ $ 17.064 $ 17,064 (CONTINUED) 75 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIOA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (GAAP BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Speoal Obhc~ahon Revenue Bonds Series 1997 Euchd and Lakeland Assessment Budc~et Actual Variance Budc, let Actual Variance Revenues: Taxes $ $ S S S S Intergovernmental Interest income 67.763 18435 (49.328) 2.739 2.739 Special assessment Total revenues 67.763 18 435 {49.328t 2.739 2.739 Expenditures'. Debt sefwce Principal retirement Inlerest and fiscal charges 250.763 249.912 851 Total expenditures 250.763 249.912 851 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures (183.000) (231.477 ) (48.477) 2.739 2.739 Other financing sourCes (uses): Proceeds from refunding bonds 13.000.000 13.000.000 Proceeds from loans Payments to refund loans (I 1.517.000) (11.517.000) Operaling Iransfers in Operating transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) 1.483.000 1.483.000 Excess of revenues and olher financ- ing sources over (under) expen. ditures and other financing (uses) 1.300.000 1.251.523 (48.477) 2.739 2.739 Fund balances at beginning of year 47.854 47.854 Prior-period adlustmenl (see Note 22) (357) (357) Fund balance as restated 47.497 47.497 Fund balances at end of year $ 1.300.000 $ 1.251.523 $ (48.477) $ S 50.236 $ 50.236 76 Isle of Capn Renovabon$ and Expansion Health Department Computer Budget Aclual Variance gudc~el Actual Variance 29,400 S 28.565 S (835) $ $ S 38.8O6 38,8O6 200 608 408 1.413 1,413 29.600 29.173 (427} 40.219 40,219 22,950 22.929 21 99.875 99,875 6,850 6,826 24 4.465 4.465 29.800 29.755 45 104.340 104,340 (200) (582) (382] (64,121) (64.121) 11,300~ 11.1951 105 (1,300) {1.195~ 105 (1,500) (1.777) (277) (64,121) (64.121) 3.800 6,137 2,337 64,121 64,121 [101) (101) 3,800 6,036 2,236 64,121 64.121 2.300 S 4,259 $ 1,959 S S $ (CONTINUED) 77 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (GAAP BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Stormwater Improvement Assessment Bonds Tota~ Budc]et Actual Variance Budc~et Actual Variance Revenues: Taxes $ S S $ 2.048,900 S 1.991,061 S (57.839) Inlergovernmental 3.827,606 3.827.606 Interest income 4.400 131,263 126,863 349,276 740,272 390,996 Special assessments 1 202.400 1,227,335 24.935 1,202,400 1.227,335 24.935 Total revenues 1,206.800 1,358,598 151,798 7,428.182 7 7,-J6.274 358.092 Expenditures: Debt service: Principal retirement 6.302,825 6.052.804 250.021 Interest and fiscal charges 26.500 26,000 500 4,376.478 3.954.484 421.994 Total expenditures 26.500 26.000 500 10.679 303 10.007.288 672.015 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures 1.180.300 1.332,598 152.298 (3,251.121) (2.221,014) 1.030.107 Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds Irom refunding bonds 1.870.000 1.870.000 14.870,000 14,870.000 Proceeds [from loans 3,365.000 3.100.000 (265.000) Payments to refund loans (3.100.000) {3,100.000) (14.617,000) (14.617.000) Operating transfers ~n 54,100 54.100 5.234,000 4,340.773 (893.227) Operating transfers out (3,392,800) (3,159.228) 233,572 Total other financing sources (uses) (1,175,900t (1.175,900) 5,459.200 4.534.545 (924.655) Excess of revenues and other financ- ing sources over (under) expen- ditures and othe financing (uses) 4.400 156.698 152,298 2.208,079 2,313.531 105.452 Fund t)alances at Deginmng of year 6.394.221 7,239.948 845.727 Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (62.475) (62.475) Fund balances as restated 6.394,221 7,177,473 783,252 Fund balances at end of year S 4.400 S 156,698 $ 152.298 S 8.602,300 $ 9.491.004 S 888.704 78 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS COUNTY-WIDE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOUNT FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS, DESIGNATED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, TO BE FUNDED BY A COUNTY- WIDE ONE MIL LEVY. PARKS IMPROVEMENTS - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF PROCEEDS FROM THE ISSUANCE OF PARKS GENERAL REFUNDING BONDS. PROJECTS INCLUDE LAND ACQUISITION, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND EQUIPPING OF CERTAIN COMMUNITY PARK SITES IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF THE COUNTY. COUNTY-WIDE LIBRARY - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE OF LIBRARY IMPACT FEES COLLECTED FROM ALL QUALIFYING NEW CONSTRUCTION. THESE IMPACT FEES MUST BE USED FOR THE ACQUISITION OF COUNTY-WIDE LIBRARY FACILITIES. PARKS IMPACT DISTRICTS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE BY DISTRICTS OF COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL PARK IMPACT FEES COLLECTED FROM ALL QUALIFYING NEW CONSTRUCTION. THE IMPACT FEES MUST BE USED FOR THE ACQUISITION OF COMMUNITY PARKS BY DISTRICT. ROAD IMPACT DISTRICTS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE BY DISTRICT OF ROAD IMPACT FEES COLLECTED FROM ALL QUALIFYING NEW CONSTRUCTION. THE IMPACT FEES MUST BE USED FOR THE ACQUISITION OF TRANSPORTATION RELATED FACILITIES BY DISTRICT. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE IMPACT FEES COLLECTED FROM ALL QUALIFYING NEW CONSTRUCTION. THE IMPACT FEES MUST BE USED FOR ACQUISITION/CONSTRUCTION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES FACILITIES. ROAD CONSTRUCTION - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE OF LOCAL OPTION, STATE ALLOCATED GAS TAX AND COMMERCIAL PAPER LOAN PROGRAM PROCEEDS. PROJECTS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VARIOUS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS. WATER MANAGEMENT - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS RAISED SPECIFICALLY FOR WATER MANAGEMENT PURPOSES. PRIMARY FUNDING IS AD VALOREM TAXES MARCO ISLAND BEACH RENOURISHMENT - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF PROCEEDS FROM A $5,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND ISSUE FOR THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT OF CERTAIN BEACHES ON MARCO ISLAND. OTHER CAPITAL PROJECTS - TO ACCOUNT FOR MAJOR CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FINANCED FROM RESOURCES OTHER THAN PROCEEDS FROM THE ISSUANCE OF LONG-TERM DEBT AND THE ONE MIL LEVY. COMBINING BALANCE SHEET ALL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 County. Wide Pad<s Road Capital Pa~s County. Wide Impacl Impact Iml3rovements Improvements L~brar7 Chstncts ~stncL~ Cash and investments S 3.397.040 S 1.320.048 $ 2,508.338 S 7.355978 S 20.118.554 Receivables: Spec;al assessments Interest 19.404 6.117 12 095 33.136 91 819 Other 56.753 1.079 361 1.556 2.758 Due from other funds 31.694 Due from other governments 8.178 5.84~ 167.907 Prepaid costs Total assets $ 3473.197 $ 1.358,938 $ 2.528.972 S 7.3c~.518 $ 20.381.038 LIA~ILITI£S~,ND F LIND_B/~L,a~ICES Liabilities: Vouchers payableandaccruals S 221,590 S 79.150 S 132,708 S 253.933 S 181.688 Due to other funds 663 135 Due to other governments Deferred revenues 150,660 3.348.565 12.855.349 Retainage payable 309.591 1,221 33,325 50.895 64,451 Total Iiab~hties 531,844 80.371 316.693 3.653 393 ~3 101.623 Fund balances: Reserved for: Encumbrances 1.482,557 376.901 1.112,680 1.015,004 1.423.141 Unreserved: Designaled for future capital prelects 1,458,796 901,666 1,099,599 2,728.121 5.856.274 Total fund balances 2,941,353 1.278,567 2,212.279 3,743,125 7.279.415 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 3,473,197 $ 1.358.938 $ 2,528,972 $ 7.396,518 $ 20.381.038 79 .... II II ....... III IIII II IIIII II I II ........ I ! I Emergency Marco Island Olher Medical Road Waler Beach Capilal m Send,ce Co~,struct,on Mana~emen! Renounshment Projects Total I S 617,981 $ 10.963.422 S 1,491.862 $ 37,566 $ 1.487.414 $ 49.298.203 171.559 171.559 3r 5 ~{ 1 47. 524 7.438 199 30.385 251.628 m 28 81,652 26,290 45,315 215.792 30,000 61,694 49.496 785,851 1,017.280 2.740 2.740 I $ 671,016 $ 11.908.449 $ 1.525,590 $ 37,765$ 1.737,413 $ 51,018.896 I I $ 48.485 $ 730.722 $ 2,015 $ $ 118.221 $ 1.768,512 151 949 5.O97 5.097 I 355.497 277.340 16.987.411 1.016.138 3.647 1.479,268 I 403.982 1.747.011 5,662 400.658 20.241,237 I 26,641 1,787.553 114.654 212.694 7.552,025 I 240,193 8,373,885 1,405,274 37.765 1,124,061 23.225.634 267,034 10,161,438 1,519,928 37,765 1,336,755 30,777.659 I S 671,016 S 11.908.449 S 1.525,590 $ 37.765 S 1,737.413 S 51.018,896 I COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES ALI. CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 County-W~de Part,.s Road Capaal Parks County-Wide Impact Impact Improvements Improvements Librar~ I~stncl$ [hstncts Revenues: Taxes S $ $ $ S Intergovernmental 384.839 Charges for serwces 35.337 178.164 325 1.092 39 Interest ~ncome 247,083 86022 96.433 401.466 1.116.578 Impact fees 1.125,419 1.739,379 4.281.070 SpeOal assessments Miscellaneous 453 661 10 2.946 I; 7.406 Total revenues 736.081 649.035 1.222.177 2.144.883 5515,093 Expenditures Capital outlay General government 1.046,828 Pubhc safely 1,830.027 Physical environment 45.318 Transportation 4,398 145 Culture and recreabon 1,149.872 1.100,300 1,689.867 Total expenditures 2.922,173 1,149,872 1,100,300 1,689.867 4.398.145 Excess of revenues over (under) expendaures (2.186,092) (500.837) 121,877 455,016 1,116.948 Other finanong sources (uses): Proceeds from loans 1,700,000 Operating transfers in 2.768,200 196,157 1.477 Operating transfers out (25.119) {51,5271 Total other financing sources (uses) 2,768,200 196.157 1,674,881 {50,050) Excess of revenues and other financ- ing sourCes over (under) expert. d~tures and other financing (uses) 582,108 {304,680) 1.796,758 404.966 1.116,948 Fund balances at beginning of year 2.418.571 1.597.483 420,047 3.385,338 6,303.393 Pnod.period adJustment (see Note 22) (59.326) (14,236) (4,5261 (47,179) (140.926) Fund balances as restated 2,359,245 1.583,247 415.521 3.338.159 6,162.467 Fund balances at end of year $ 2,941,353 $ 1.278,567 $ 2.212.279 $ 3,743.125 $ 7.279.415 81 ...................... I Il I I I I Il .......... I Emergency Marco Island Other Medical Road Waler Beach Capital Service Construction Mana~lement Renounshment Pro~ects Total S 7,652.243 $ $ $ S 7.652.243 2.278.156 26.290 83.562 2.772.847 45.421 11.509 825 272.712 41.744 624.308 82.809 3.768 127.543 2.827.754 ~:~8,820 7.754.688 538.712 538,712 220.350 160.024 954.397 650.564 10.820.478 120.608 3.768 910.666 22.773,353 1,046,828 608,820 2,438.847 - 771,197 56.904 3.278. 224 4,151.643 9,870.036 5,427 14,273,608 360,720 4,300.759 608.820 9,870,036 771.197 56.904 3,644.371 26,211.685 41,744 950.442 (650.5891 (53.136) (2.733.705) {3.438.332) 1.700.000 1.238.600 3.329,200 7.533,634 {1,453.9721 (402,672t {1.933.290) fl ,453,972t 1,238.600 2,926,528 7,300,344 41.744 (503,530) 588,011 (53,136) 192.823 3.862,012 232.457 10.778,198 939,049 96,182 1,150,773 27.321.491 I7.167) (113,2301 (7,132) (5.281) {6.841) (405,8441 225.290 10,664.968 931.917 90.901 1.143,932 26.915.647 267.034 $ 10,161.438 $ 1,519.928 $ 37.765 $ 1.336,755 $ 30.777.659 6 B' m COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BAJ.ANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL. (BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Counl¥-Wide Cap,tal Improvements Parks ImF~rovements Bud~et Actual Variance Budget Actual Vanance Revenues: Taxes S $ S $ S S Intergovernmental 1,239.100 384.839 (854,261) Charges fo~ sen~,ces 29.200 35,337 6,137 115.000 178,164 63.164 Interest mncome 21,200 247.083 225,883 89.600 86.02~ (3.578) Impact fees Special assessments M~scellaneous 350.000 453.661 103,661 1 L, 10 Total revenues 400.400 736,081 335,681 1,443,700 649.035 ¢794.665) Expenditures: Capital outlay: General government 2.055.643 1 O46,828 1.008,815 Public safety 29.634,432 1 830.027 27.804.405 Physical enwronmenl 110.000 45.318 64.682 Transportabon Culture and recreation 3.171,919 1.149,872 2.022.047 Total expenditures 31,800,075 2,922.173 28,877,902 3.171,919 1.149.872 2.022,047 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures (31,399.675) (2.186.092) 29.213.583 (1.728.2191 (500,837) 1.227.382 Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds from loans 26,429.800 (26.429,800) Operating transfers m 2,768.200 2,768,200 144.500 196.157 51.657 Operating transfers out Total other financJng sources (uses) 29.198,000 2.768.200 (26,429.800) 144.500 196.157 51.657 Excess of revenues and other financ- ,rig sources over (under) expen- ditures and other finanOng (uses) (2.201.675) 582.108 2,783,783 (1.583.719) (304.680) 1.279.039 Fund balances at I:)egmmng of year 2.392.817 2.418,571 25,754 1.592.519 1.597.483 4.964 Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (59.326) (59.326) (14.236) (14,236) Fund balances as restated 2.392.817 2.359.245 (33.572) 1.592.519 1.583.247 (9.272) Fund balances at end of year $ 191.142 $ 2,941,353 $ 2,750.211 $ 8.800 S 1.278,567 $ 1.269.767 83 I! I Co~flly. W<le I.~rary (No~-GAAP~ ~ar~s Imp~c! Dismcls (No~.GAAP~ I Budge! ActuaJ Vanaflce Budc,)et Actual Vanance I $ S S S S S o I 325 325 1.092 1.092 13.600 96.433 82.833 121.925 401.466 279.541 740.000 1.142.698 402.698 2.055.000 3.550. 574 1.495.574 I 10,000 2.946 (7.054) 753.600 1. 239.456 485.856 2,186,925 3,956.078 1. 769.153 I I I 2.475.082 1.100,300 1,374,782 4335.385 1.689,867 3.045.518 2.475.082 1.100,300 1,374.782 4,735,385 1,689,867 3.045.518 I I1.721.482) 139.156 1.860.638 (2.548.460) 2.266.211 4.814.671 I 1,664,500 1.700,000 35,500 1.487 1,477 {10) (91.900) {25.119) 66.781 (322.4871 (51.5271 270.960 ! 1.572.600 1.674.881 102.281 (321.000) (50.050) 270.950 ! (148.882) 1.814.037 1.962.919 (2,869.460) 2,216.161 5.085,621 I .369.427 (212.011) (581.438) 4.770.757 (2.147.285) (6.918.042) {4.526) (4.526) (47.1791 t47.179) J l 369.427 (216,537) {585.964) 4.770.757 (2.194,464) (6.965.22,) $ 220.5455 1,597,500 S 1.376.955 S 1,901.2975 21.697 S, (1.879.600) II (CONTINUED) I" _lI COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL (BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, '1997 Road Impact D~stncts {Non-GA,API Emerc~enc~, Med~ca! Serwces {r,~on.GAAPt Budc~et Actual Variance Bud,clef Actual Variance Revenues: Taxes $ $ $ $ S S Intergovernmental Charges fox serwces 39 39 Interesl income 464.100 1.116.578 652.478 19.000 41.744 22.744 Impact fees 5.400.000 7.527.183 2,127,183 240,000 414.621 174.621 Special assessments M~scellaneous 332 117,406 117,074 Total revenues 5.864.432 8.761.206 2,896,774 259.000 456.365 197.365 Expenditures: Capital oullay: General government Public safety 678,336 608,820 69.516 Physical envirOnment Transportatio~ 13,599,830 4.398.145 9.201.685 Culture and recreation Total expenditures 13,599.830 4.398.145 9.201,685 678,336 608.820 69.516 Excess of revenues over (under) ex pend~lures (7.735.3981 4.363.061 12.098.459 (419.336) ( 152.455) 266.881 Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds from loans Operating transfers m Operating transfers out Total other finanCing sources (uses) Excess of revenues and other financ. lng sources over (under) expen- ditures and other I~nancmg (uses) (7,735.398) 4,363,061 12,098,459 (419,336) (152.455) 266,881 Fund balances at beginning of year 14.536.159 3.115.480 (11.420,679) 582,636 (8.605) (591.241) Prior-period adlustmenl (see Note 22) (140.926) (140,926) (7.167) (7,167) Fund balances as restated 14.536.159 2.974.554 I11.561,605) 582,636 (15.772) (598.408) Fund balances at end of year S 6.800.761 S 7.337.615 S 536.854 $ 163,300 $ (168.227) $ (331.527) 85 Road Constructson Water Manac~ement I Budc. le! Actual Var,ance Budc. let Actual Varsance I $ 8,341,600 S 7.652.243 $ (689,357) S $ S 2.282.400 2.278.156 (4.244) 157.000 26.290 (130.710) I 45.421 45.421 11.509 11.509 61.000 624.308 563.308 49.700 82.809 33.109 I 205.807 220.350 14.543 10.749 (10.749) 10.890.807 10.820.478 (70.329) 217.449 120.608 (c:J6.84 I) I 2.197.916 771.197 1.426.719 20.474.073 9.870.036 10.604.037 20.474.073 9.870.036 10.604.037 2.197.916 771.197 1.426.719 (9.583.266) 950.442 10.533.708 (1.980.467) (650.589) 1.329.878 2.000.000 (2.000.000) 1.238.600 1.238.600 {1.561.0001 (1.453.972) 107.028 439,000 (1,453.972) (1,892,972) 1.238,600 1.238,600 (9.144.266) (503.530) 8.640.736 (741,867) 588.011 1,329.878 9,952.267 10,778,198 825,931 921,467 939,049 17.582 {113.230) (113.230) (7,132) I7.132) 9.952.267 10.664.968 712.701 921.467 931,917 10.450 808,001 $ 10.161,438 $ 9,353.437 S 179.600 S 1,519.928 S 1.340.328 (CONTINUED) COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES. EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL (BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Marco Island Beach Renounshment Other Capital Pro~ects Bud~let Actual Variance Bud~let Actual Variance Revenues: Taxes $ $ S S S S Intergovernmental 360.902 83.562 (277.340) Charges for services 825 825 Interest income 5.300 3.768 (1.532) 53.603 127.543 73.943 Impact fees SpeOal assessments 533.800 538 712 4.912 M,scellaneous 252,450 160.024 I92.426) Total revenues 5,300 3,768 (1,5321 1.200,752 910.666 1290.086) Expendilures: Capital outlay: General government Public safety Physical env;ronmen! 56,904 56.904 3,871.150 3,278.224 592.926 Transportation 12,000 5.427 6.573 Culture and recreation 651,495 360.720 290,775 Total expenditures 56,904 56,904 4.534,645 3,644.371 890.274 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures (51,604) (53.136) (1.532) (3.333,893) 12.733.705) 600.188 Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds from loans Operating transfers in 3,594.200 3,329.200 (265,000) Operating transfers GUI f470,660) (402.672) 67.988 Total other financing sources (uses) 3,123.540 2,926,528 (197.012) Excess of revenues and other financ- ing sources over (under) expen- ditures and other financing (uses) (51.604) (53,136) (1,532) (210.353) 192,823 403.176 Fund balances at beginmng Gl year 151,904 96,182 (55,722) 902.993 1.150.773 247.780 Pnor-penod adjustment (see Note 22) (5.281) (5,281 ~ (6.641) (6.641) Fund balances as restated 151.904 90.901 (61.003) 902.993 1,143.932 240.939 Fund balances at end of year S 100.300 S 37.765 S (62.535) S 692.640 $ 1.336.755 $ 644.115 87 Total Budc~e! Actual Variance 8.341.600 $ 7.652,243 $ (689,357) 4,039.402 2.772.847 (1,266,555) 144,200 272.712 128,512 899,025 2.827.754 1.928.729 8.435,000 12,635.076 4,200,076 533,800 538.712 4.912 · 829.338 954.397 125,059 23,222.365 27,653.741 4,431,376 2,055.643 1.046.828 1.008.815 30,312,768 2,438.847 27.873,921 6.235,970 4,151.64 3 2,084.327 34,085,903 14,273.608 19,812.295 11,033.881 4,300,759 6,733.122 83,724.165 26.211,685 57,512,480 {60,501,800t 1.442,056 61,943,856 30,094.300 ,700,000 (28.394,300) 7,746.987 7,533,634 (213,353) (2.446,047~ (1,933.2901 512.757 35.395.240 7,300,344 (28,094.8961 (25.106,560) 8.742.400 33.848.960 36.172.946 17.727.835 (18.445,111) - (405,644~ (405,844) 36,172.946 17.321.991 (18.850.955) 11.066.386 $ 26,064,391 $ 14,998.005 ENTERPRISE FUNDS COUNTY WATER AND SEWER - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE PROVISION OF WATER AND SEWER AND EFFLUENT SERVICES TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE COUNTY'S UNINCORPORATED AREA. MARCO WATER AND SEWER - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE PROVISION OF SEWER SERVICES TO THE RESIDENTS OF MARCO ISLAND. GOODLAND WATER - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE PROVISION OF POTABLE WATER SERVICES TO THE RESIDENTS OF GOODLAND. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE PROVISION OF SOLID WASTE OISPOSAL SERVICES TO USERS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY, EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY AMBULANCE AND PARAMEDICAL SERVICES TO USERS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. AIRPORT AUTHORITY - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE PROVISION OF LANDING FACILITIES AND THE SALE OF FUEL AT THE AIRPORTS, COMBINING BALANCE SHEET ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30, '1997 Counb/Water Marco Water Goodland Solid Waste ASSETS and Sewer and Sewer Water Disposal Current assets: Cash andlnvestments S 20.877.288 S 181.553 S 375.243 S 17.881.910 Receivables: Interest 377.578 2.292 2.108 303.379 Trade. net 1.905.111 27.364 18.523 1.221.947 Unbilled 1.530.326 Due from other funds 2.346 24.439 Inventory 642.981 1.624 20 Prepaid costs 12.320 Total current assets 25.347.950 212.833 395.894 19.431.675 Res~ncled assets: Cash and Investments 52.320.551 346.834 49.576 308.956 Special assessments receivable: Current 876.724 514 884 Deferred 11.503.612 90.625 101.267 Accrued interest 859.292 4.664 6.694 Notes receivable 1.979.119 Due from other governments 164.799 Total reslncted assets 67.539.298 442.637 158.421 473.755 Property. plant and equipment: Land 4.473.799 860 365 1.670.490 Buildings 115.026.924 271.130 Improvements other than buildings 245.264.525 4.743.740 1.211.441 10.640.340 Ecluipment 4.391.462 683.342 Constructfon ~n progress 29.717.105 356.877 214.795 Total property, plant and equ~pmenl 398.873.815 4.744.600 1.568.683 13.480.097 Less accumulated depreciation (69.101.262) {1.444.767) (772.348) (4.968.150) Net property, planl and eclulpmenl 329.772.553 3.299.833 796.335 8.511.947 Other assets 8.034.426 7.894 568.785 Total assets $ 430.694.227 $ 3.963.197 $ 1.350.650 S 28.986.162 89 .......... III II III - III I I .... I III I IIII I II I E~rgency Medmcal Airl:)Ort Semces Autt~'mt), Total 444,863 $ 190,906 $ 39.951.763 3.378 1,113 689.848 606.443 30,165 3,809.553 71 1,530.397 26,785 49,230 43.180 737,035 12.320 1.103.914 265.435 46.757,701 151.732 1.389.095 54,566,744 878.122 11,695.504 719 5.582 876.951 1,979,119 878.772 1.043.571 152.451 2.273.449 71.040.011 1,289,400 7,434,914 221.588 1.405,269 116,924,911 3.127 4,115,612 265,978.785 2.148.240 713,901 7,936,945 893.275 31.182,052 2.372.955 8.417,457 429,457.607 (1,161,366) {375,684) (77.823.577) 1.211,589 8,041.773 351,634.030 8.611,105 2.467.9~ $ 10,580,657 $ 478,(~2,~7 _ (CONTINUED) m COMBINING BALANCE SHEET ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS (CONTINUED) SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 County Water Marco Water Goodland Solid Waste and Sewer and Sewer Water Disposal LI AB IIJ_TJ I~ $_~U~ID.EUND_E QU [T_Y Current hablhbes: Vouchers payable and accruals S 2.663,186 S 36,500 S 3,720 S 839.799 Due to other funds 6,775 40 4 62 Currenl maturities of notes payable 215.639 Total current I,abdlbes 2885.600 36,540 3,724 839.861 Current liabihties payable from restricted assets: Vouchers payable 2.624,461 95.602 Deferred revenue 186 Current maturities of notes payable 570.0:30 Current matuntles of revenue bonds 3.310.000 62.737 4.000 Due to other governments 204.682 410 Accrued interest payable 1.952.930 4,928 673 Customer deposits 16.762 145,518 5,970 212,944 Retainage payable 1.211,893 15.600 Total current liabiht~es payable from restricted assets 9,890,758 213,183 26,429 308.956 Long.term habdlties: Landfill liability 4.324.693 Revenue bonds payable (riel) 94.617.230 177.947 157.000 Notes payable 16.178,506 Accrued compensated absences 431,095 4.368 559 Total long-term liabilities 111.226,831 182,315 157.559 /,.324.693 Total liabilities 124,003,189 432.038 187.712 5.473,510 Fund equity: Conlributed capital 227,501,785 , , 3.305,745 793.004 485.226 Retained earnings: Reserved for: Revenue bond retirement 9,658,o09 17.021 42,600 Renewal and replacement 300.020 100,000 Unreserved 69.230,624 108,393 327,334 23.027.426 Total retained earnings 79.189.253 225,414 369.934 23.027.426 Total fund equity 306.691,038 3,531.159 1.162,938 23.512,652 Total liabilities and fund equity $ 430.694,227 $ 3,963.197 $ 1,350.650 $ 28.986.162 91 II I i IIII IIIII II II II III II I I~ II I I I I II III ..................... I I Emergency Medical Airporl Sen/ices Au{honh/ To~I I $ 59.468 $ 60.615 $ 3.663.288 I 20 2,707.454 2.714,355 215,639 59.488 2.768.069 6,593,282 I I 13.935 75,854 2,809,852 52,775 174,332 227,293 295,000 885,030 3,376,737 I 745 205.837 1,958,531 6.450 387,644 i 40.934 1,268.427 66,710 593.315 11,09~,351 I m 4,324.693 94,952.177 1.540,000 17.718.506 321,849 19,898 777.769 I 321.849 1,559,898 117,773,145 I 448,047 4.921.282 135.465,778 822,385 6,472,146 239,380,291 Emergency Medical Airporl Services AuU~ortb/ Total 59,468 $ 60.615 $ 3,663.288 20 2.707,454 2,714.355 215.639 59.488 2,768.069 6.593.282 m 13.935 75,854 2,809.852 52.715 174.332 227.293 295.000 865.030 3.376.737 I 745 205.837 1,958,531 6.450 387,644 m 40.934 1.268,427 66.710 593,315 11,099.351 I m 4.324.693 94.952,177 1.540,000 17.718,506 321.849 19,898 777,769 i 321,849 1.559,898 117,773.145 I 448.047 4.921.282 135,465,778 I 822.385 6,472.146 239,380.291 m 9.718,230 400.020 1,197.522 (812,771) 93.078,528 I 1,197.522 (812.771) 103.196,778 I 2,019.907 5,659.375 342.577,069 I $ 2.467.954 S 10,580.657 S 478.042.847 92 I 6 8 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 County Water Marco Water Goodland Solid Waste and Sewer and Sewer Waler D~sposal Operahng revenues: Charges for services $ 37.471.873 $ 570.906 $ 193.752 $ 11.544.655 Total operating revenues 37.471.873 570.906 193.752 11.544.655 Operating expenses: Personal services 6.857.793 68.793 29.453 390.223 Operating ; 1 228.345 421.121 225.651 11.919.421 DepreC~ahon 8.259.162 109.523 56.859 79.158 Amo~zation 139.678 7.894 196.578 Total operating expenses 26.484.978 607.331 311.963 12.585.380 Operaling income (loss) 10.986.895 (36.425) (118.211) {1.040.725) Non-operating revenues (expenses): tnleresl income 4.907.695 61.562 42.911 1.253.109 Interest expense (6.569.877) (16.477) (8.215) Miscellaneous income 42.843 Gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets (89.142) (1.392) Loss on discontinued projects (148.426) Grants and ent41ements 407.199 Total non-operahng revenues (expenses) (1.899.750) 45.085 34.696 1.701.759 Income (loss) before operabng transfers 9.087.145 8.660 (83.515) 661.034 Operating transfers: Operating transfers m 159.426 Operating transfers out (65.437) Total operahng transfers 93.989 Net income (loss) 9.181.134 8.660 (83.515) 661.034 Deprec~abon of conlnbuted assets 4.537.591 84.763 20.333 4.189 Increase (de,ease) tn retained earnings 13.718.725 93.423 (63.182) 665.223 Retained earnings at beginning of year 65.949.742 135.103 437.642 22.509.080 Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (479.214) (3.112) (4.526) (146.877) Retained earnings as restated 65.470.528 131.991 433.116 22.362.203 of year $ 79.189,253 $ 225,414 S 369,934 $ 23.027.426 Retained earnings at end ~3 I Emergency Medical A~rpo~l Sennces AulhO~ty Total I $ 4.583.327 $ 869.419 $ 55.233.932 i 4,583,327 869.419 55,233,932 I 5,650,115 430,979 13,427,356 2,479,209 777,116 27,050.863 223,712 95,884 8,824,298 344.150 I 8.353.036 1.303.979 49.646.667 I (3.769.709,) {434.560,). 5.587.265 53,455 59,374 6,378,106 (203,327) (6,797.896) 8,283 51,126 (52,672) 531 (142,675) (148,426) 46,542 453.741 47.325 (135.139) {206.024) (3,722,3841 {589.699) 5.381,241 4,211,470 4.370,896 {1.000) (155.416) (221.853) 4.210.470 (155.4161 4.149.043 488,086 (725,115) 9,530,264 134,143 62,827 4.843,846 622,229 (662,288) 14,374,130 580,679 (135,830) 89,476,416 (5.386) I14.653) (653.768t 575.293 (150.483) 88.822.648 1,197,522 $ (812,7'71! $ 103,196.778 COLLIER COUNW. FcOR,DA ,.,f" II COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS BUDGET AND ACTUAL (BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 County Water and Sewer (Non. GAAP) Marco Water and Sewer (Non-GAAP) Budget Actual Variance Budc, let Actual Variance Operating revenues Chargesfo~serwces $ 34.252.100 S 37.471.873 $ 3.219.773 $ 535.400 S 570.906 5 35.506 Total operating revenues 34.252.100 37.471.873 3.219.773 535.400 570.906 35.506 Operaling expenses: Personal services 7.470.100 6.857.793 612.307 73.100 68.793 4.307 Operating 22.336.853 15.021.148 7.315.705 512.000 421.121 90.879 Capital outlay 49.502.986 13.165.267 36.337.7t9 Total operating e~penses 79.309.939 35.044.208 44.265.731 585.100 489.914 95.186 Operating ~ncome (~oss) {45.057.8391 2.427.665 47.485.504 {49.700) 80 992 130.692 Non.operating revenues fexpenses ) Interest income 3.103.000 4.780.641 1.677.641 83.000 61.562 (21.438) Cash contributions recewed 7.181.800 13.799.579 6.617.779 Proceeds from the d,sposal of I~xed assets 67.435 67.435 Proceeds from loans 11.889.500 5.140.768 (6.748.732) Pnncipal payments (3.740.100) (3.651.759) 88.341 (62.800) (62.737) 63 Interest and f~scal charges (6.324.900) (6.244.933) 79.967 (20 100) (16.477) 3.623 Miscellaneous income 50.000 (50.000) Grants and entitlements Total non-opera t~ng revenues (ex penses) 12.159.300 13.891.731 1.732.431 100 ( 17.652) ( 17.752 ) Income (loss) before operating transfers (32.898.539) 16.319.396 49.217.935 (49.600) 63.340 112.940 Operating transfers: Operating transfers ~n 16.210.260 20.685.379 4.475.119 Operating transfers out (16.125.700) f20.591.390) (4.465.690) TOtal operating transfers 84.560 93.989 9.429 Net income (Joss) (32.813.979) 16.413.385 49.227.364 (49.600) 63.340 112.940 Retained earmngs aP beginmng of year 55.183.066 65.949.742 10.766.676 112.500 135.103 22.603 Pnor.penod adjustment (see Note 22) (479.214~ {479.2141 (3.112) (3.112) Retained earnings as restated 55.183.066 65.470.528 10.287.462 112.500 131.991 19.491 Retainedearmngs at end of year S 22.369.087 $ 81.883.913 S 59.514.826 S 62.900 $ 195.331 ~ 132.431 Reconciliation: Nel income (loss) (budgetary basis) S 16.413.385 S 63.340 Capitalized expenses 16.958.070 PrinOpal payments 3.651.759 62.737 Allowance for doubtful accounts Depreciation and amortization (8.398.840) (117.417) Cash contributions received (13.799.579) Proceeds from loans (5.140.768) Interest income (expense) (197.890) Non-cash loss on disposal of assets (156.577) Loss on disconbnued projects (148,426) Grants and entitlements Net income (loss) (GAAP basis) $ 9.181.134 $ 8,660 95 ! C.,oodland Water (NOn-GAAP1 Soltd Waste Ehsposal (Non-GAAP) I Budc, let Aclual Vanance Budc. let Actual Variance I S 268.000 S 193.752 $ (74.2481S 11.793500 $ 11.544.655 S (248.845) 268.000 193.752 (74.248) 11 793.500 11.544.655 (248.845) I 27,700 29.453 ( 1.753 ) 405.110 390.223 14.887 256,088 225,651 30.437 ~4.156,647 11,919,421 2,237,226 336.500 331.635 4,865 137.871 283,598 { 145,727) I 620.288 586.739 33.549 14.699.628 12.593.242 2.106.386 (352.2881 {392.9871 (40.699) (2.906.128) {1.048.587t 1.857.541 I 33.000 42.911 9.911 1.040.900 1.253.109 212.209 I (4.000) (4.000) (8,200} (8.215) (15) i 19.200 42,843 23.643 428.289 407,199 (21,090) 20,800 30,696 9.895 1.488.389 1.703,151 214.762 I (331,488~ (362.291 ) (30.803) 11,417.739) 654,564 2,072.303 I 1,587.800 1,587,800 (1.587,800) (1,587,800) {331,488) (362,291) (30,803) (1.417,739) 654.564 2,072.303 721,788 437,642 (284.146) 17.868,339 22,509,080 4,640,741 (4.526) (4.526! {146.877) (146.877) 721.788 433.116 (288.672) 17.868.339 22.362.203 4.493.864 390.300 $ 70.825 $ (319.475) $ 16.450.600 $ 23.016.767 $ 6.566.167 (CONTINUED) $ (362.291) $ 654.564 331.635 283.597 4,000 (56,859) (275.735) (1.392) $ (83.515! $ 661.034 96 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ~'t B '~ s"' COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNING BUDGET AND ACTUAL (BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Emerc~ency Med,cal Serwces {Non-GAAP) A~rport AuthOr~ (Non. GAAP) Budc~e[ Actual Variance Budcjet Actual Variance Operating revenues Charges for serwces $ 3.479.177 $ 4.583.327 $ 1.104.150 $ 900.980 $ 869.419 S (31.561) Total o~erating revenues 3.479.177 4.583.327 1.104.150 900.980 869.419 (31.561) Operabng expenses: Personal serwces 5.891.717 5.650.115 241.602 441.236 430.979 10.257 Operating 1.451.139 1.299.676 15 t .463 912.034 777.116 134.918 Capital outlay 12.783 12.780 3 1.651.755 963.757 687.998 Total operating expenses 7.355.639 6.962.571 393.068 3.005.025 2.17~.852 833.173 Operating income (toss) (3,876,462) (2.379.244~ 1.497,218 (2,104,045) (1.302,433) 801.612 Non..operat~ng revenues (expenses)' Interest income 32,360 53.455 21,095 4,600 59,374 54.774 Cash conlribut~ons recewed - Proceeds Irom the d~sposal of fixed assets 15.788 15.788 639 639 Proceeds ~rom loans 1.114.500 690.000 (424.500) Principal payments (1.291.735) (1.291.735) Interesl and fiscal charges (70.500) (121.406) (50.906) Miscellaneous income 3.100 8.283 5.183 Grants and entitlements 59.412 46.542 (12.870) 1.399.227 1.613.687 214.460 'T oral non-operabng revenues (expenses) 91.772 115.785 24.013 1.159.192 958.842 (200.350) Income (loss) belore operating transfers (3.784.690) (2.263.459) 1.521.231 (944.853) (343.591) 601.262 Operating transfers: Operating transfers ~n 4.211.470 4.211.470 477.400 17.400 (460.000) Operating transfers out {1.000) (1.000t (17.4001 (172.816~ (155.416) Total operating transfers 4.210.470 4.210.470 460.000 1155.416) (615.416) Net income (toss) 425.780 1.947.011 1.521.231 (484.853) (499.007) (14.154) Retained earmngs at beg~nmng of year (9.180) 580.679 589.859 2.771.811 (135.830) (2.907.641) Prior.period adjustment (see Nole 22) (5.386) {5.386) I14.653) (14.653) Retained earmngs as restated (9.180) 575.293 584.473 2.771.811 (150.483) (2.922.294) Retained earnings at end o! year S 416.600 S 2.522.304 $ 2.105.704 $ 2.286.958 S (649.490) $ (2.936.448) Reconciliation: Net income (loss) (budgetary basis') $ 1.947.011 $ (499.007) Capitahzed expenses 12.780 963.757 Principal payments 1.291.735 Allowance for doubtful accounts { 1.179.533) Depreciation and amorhzat~on (223.712) (95.884) Cash contributions received Proceeds from loans (690,000) Interest income (expense) (81,921) Non-cash loss on disposal of assets (108) Loss on discontinued projects Grants and entitlements (68.460) (1.613.687) Net income (loss) (GAAP bas~s) S 488.086 S (725.115) 97 Tolal Budc, le! Actual Vanance $ 55.233.932 $ 4.004.775 51.229.157 51.229.157 55.233.932 4,004.775 14.308.963 13.427.356 881.607 39.624.761 29.664.133 9.960,628 51.54 1,895 14.757,037 36.884.858 105,575.619 ,,, 57,848.526 47.727,093 (54.346.462) I2.614,5941 51,731.868 4.296,860 6.251,052 1.954,192 7.181,800 13,799,579 6,617,779 83.862 83,862 13,004,000 5,830,768 (7.173.232) (5,098,635) (5,010,231) 88,404 (6,423,700) (6.391.031) 32.669 72,300 51,126 (21,174) 1,886,928. 2,067,428 180,500 14,919,553 16.682.553 1,763,000 (39.426,909) 14.067.959 53.494,868 26,502.049 4.015,119 22,486.930 117.731.9001 f22,353,0061 {4.621.106) 4,755,030 4.149,043 (605,987) (34,671.879) 18.217,002 52.888,881 76.648,324 89,476,416 12,828,092 {653.7681 (653.7681 76,648,324 88,822.548 12,174.324 41.976,445 $ 107,039,650 $ 65,063,205 18,217.002 18,549.839 5,010,231 (1,179.533) (9,168.447) (13,799.579) (5.830.768) (219.811 ) (158,077) (148,426) tl,602.147I 9.530.284 COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Counb/ Marco Water Goodland Solid Waste Water and Sewer And Sewer Water D~sposal Cash flows from operating actwffies: Cash received for semices $ 36,445.860 S 559.955 $ ,198,230 S 11.509.967 Cash received from Customer deposits 11,717 (100) Cash payments on behalf of other governments (14.313) Cash payments for goods and ser~,ces (11,230.316) (414.966) (222.957) (11.538.673) Cash payments to employees (6.998.921) (70.732) (29.776) (390.783) Net cash prowded by (used for) operabng actw~lies 18.202.310 85.974 (54,603) 1419.489~ Cash flows from non.capit~l finanong activilies; Cash operabng grants received 442.330 Cash transfers from other funds 20.751,375 1,6/'2.076 Cash Iransfers 1o other funds (20,657,386~ ( 1,672,076) Net cash provided by (used for) non. capital finanong actw~t~es 93,989 442.330 Cash flOWS front cap~tal and related finanCing activities: Cash contribubons received 13.799.579 86.937 19,153 Receipts from capital grants Proceeds from d~sposat of fixed assets 67.435 1.699 Proceeds from sale of scrap 42.843 Proceeds from rental of land Proceeds from loans 4.494.123 Payments for cap~tal acquisibons (14,886.732) (316.033 ) (197.56~) PrinOpal payments on bonds (2.990,497) (62.737) (3.000) PrinOpal payments on notes (661.262) Interest and fiscal agent fees paid (6.347.996) (18.416) (8.225) Net cash provided by (used for) capital and related financing acl~vit~es (6,525.350) 5.784 (308.105) f153,018) Cash flows from investing activities; Interesl and dividends on mveslments 4.869.877 61,251 44,211 1.200.278 Net cash provided by investing activities 4,869,877 61.251 44.211 1.200.278 Net increase (decrease) in cash 16.640,826 153,009 (318.497) 1,070.101 Cash, October 1, 1996 (including $39,716.004 in restricted cash) 57,036.227 378,490 747,842 17.267.642 Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (479,214) (3.112) (4,526) (146.877) Cash, October 1. 1996 (including $39,716,004 in restricted cash) as restated 56.557,013 375,378 743,316 17,120,765 Cash. September 30, 1997 (including $54,566,744 in restricted cash) $ 73,197,839 S 528,387 $ 424,819 $ 18.190.866 Emergenc? Medical Sennces Au~ Total 3.103.7~ $ ~.073 S 52.~.851 1.889 13,~ (14.313) (1,322.037) (759.074) (25.488,023) (5.728.7~) {428,373) (13.~7,379) (3.NI,NS} ~321,485~ 13,~5,~2 52.276 4~,~6 {1.~ (155,416~ {22,485,S78~ 4.262.746 (155,416~ 4,~3,~9 4~,~ 14,365,~9 1,613,~7 1,613.687 15,788 639 85.561 42,~3 8,283 8,283 (3.0~,2~) (1.291.735) (1.952,~7) {104.157~ (6.478,7~ 3,008 ~ 14.020 {6.863.661 ~.381 58,152 6.2~,1~ ~,381 58,152 369,070 (3~,729) 17,609,780 232,911 1,899,383 77.562,495 (5,386) (14.653} (653,768) 227.525 1.8~.730 76,~8.727 (CONTINUEO) 100 COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES County Marco Water Ooodland Solid Waste Water and Sewer And Sewer Water Disposal Operating income (loss) $ 10.986.895 S {36.425~ S {118.211) S (1.040.725) Adjustments to reconole oDerating income (loss) to net CaSh provided by (used for) operating actw~ties: Depreoat~on expense 8.259.162 109,523 56.859 79,158 Amorbzation of Capital improvement prolects 129,041 ". ~6.578 Amortization of bond issuance costs 7,894 (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (931.099) (10,051) 4,478 (34,688) (Increase) decrease in due from other funds (2.338) (Increase) decrease in inventory (1,624) 69 Increase (decrease) in vouchers payable (24.363) 7,739 2,625 380,748 Increase (decrease) in accrued wages (96.604) (1.742) (510) 2.572 Increase (decrease) in accrued compensated absences (44.524) (197) 187 (3.132) Increase (dec~ease) in due to other governments (73.860) 40 Increase (decrease) in customer deposits payable 11,717 (100) Total adiustments 7,215.415 122.399 63,608 621.236 Net Cash provided by (used for) operating act,wt~es $ 18,202.310 S 85,974 S (54.603) S (419.489) Non-cash investing, capital and financing achvifies: There were non-cash developer contributions of $6,673.046 in the County Water and Sewer District Fund. There were non-Cash contributions from private organizations of $300,000 in the Airport Authority Fund. The Solid Waste Disposal Fund received conlributions of assets from various funds with a depreciated value of $210,809. The original cost of these assets was S211.394 with $585 in accumulated depreciation. 101 --- ! I I III IIIII II II1[111 II II ........... I~,-- ' ............... I I ~ ~ ! Emergency Medical A~rport Services Aulhorit~ Total {3,769.709~ $ (434.560) $ 5,587,265 223.712 95,884 8,824,298 325,619 7,894 (300,O28) (5,346) (1,277.6341 2O (2,3181 (1,1201 12,181 9,506 (21.2611 5,140 350,628 (73.221) (5,521) (175,026) (5.458) 8,127 (44.997) 721 (73.0991 1,889 13,506 {177,3561 113,075 7,958,377 (3.947,065~) $, !321,485} $ 13,545.64;2 I I I I I m 102 INTERNALSERVICEFUNDS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - TO ACCOUNT FOR EXPENSES THAT INVOLVES THE EFFECTIVE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY WHICH PROMOTES SHARING INFORMATION AND mRESOURCES TO THE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES OF THE COUNTY SELF-INSURANCE TO ACCOUNT FOR THE SELF-INSURANCE COSTS OF PROVIDING m COVERAGE FOR PROPERTY, GENERAL AND VEHICLE LIABILITY; TO ACCOUNT FOR THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH BENEFITS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES AND THEIR DEPENDENTS. TO ACCOUNT FOR PAYMENT OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS, IN LIEU OF INSURANCE. I MANAGEMENT - TO ACCOUNT FOR ALL ASPECTS OF COUNTY OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS CAPITAL PROJECTS AND TO ACHIEVE TIMELY AND COST EFFECTIVE RESULTS, WHILE PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING THE TECHNICAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICE REQUIRED. m DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - TO PROVIDE COST EFFICIENT BILLING AND COLLECTION PROCESS, ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT AND REVENUE CONTRACTUAL MANAGEMENT IN THE COUNTY MANAGER'S AGENCY. SHERIFF'S SELF-INSURANCE - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH BENEFITS TO SHERIFF EMPLOYEES AND THEIR DEPENDENTS; TO ACCOUNT FOR PAYMENT OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS, IN LIEU OF INSURANCE. FLEET MANAGEMENT TO ACCOUNT FOR FUEL, OIL, LUBRICANTS. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE OF COUNTY VEHICLES AND THE USE OF CERTAIN COUNTY OWNED VEHICLES BY COUNTY EMPLOYEES COMBINING BALANCE SHEET ALL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 Office of Department Information Self- Capital Projects of .A.~.,~ TechnoIo<:.l~' Insurance Mana(:.lement Revenue Current assets: Cash and investments $ 242,160 $ 7.818,422 $ 1.731.938 $ 399.648 Rece,vables: Interest 888 37.391 6.284 2.192 Trade, nel 7.712 3,375 4.704 Due front other lunds 158 - Advances and deposits Inventory Total current assets 250,760 7.859,188 1.738,380 406,544 Properly, plant and equipment: Buildings Equipmenl 1,391,752 40,502 495.239 850,253 Total property, plant and equipment 1.391,752 40,502 495.239 850.253 Less accumulated depreciation (678.694) (17,977) (274.232} (388.217} Net property, planl and equipment 713.058 22,525 221.007 462.036 Total assets $ 963.818 $ 7.881,713 $ 1,959,387 $ 868.580 Current liabililies: Vouchers payable and acc;uals S 28.654 S 321,863 $ 23.600 S 34.229 Self.insurance claims payable 1.422,147 Due to other funds 8.726 114 Current matuntfes of lease obligations 29,459 Total currenl liabilities 37,380 1,744,010 23,600 63.802 Long-term liabilibes: Capitalized lease obligation 54,704 Selhinsurance claims payable 4.301.301 Accrued compensated absences 23,303 22.349 244,644 101.713 Total long.term liabilities 23,303 4,323,650 244.644 156.417 Total liabilities 60.683 6,u~7.660 268.244 220.219 Fund equity: Con~buted capital 517,983 6,368 949.739 101.387 Retained earnings: Unreserved 385,152 1,807.685 741.404 546.974 Total fund equity 903,135 1,814,053 1.691.143 648.361 Totalliabilities and fund equ~b/ $ 963,818 $ 7.881,713 $ 1.959,387 $ 868.580 103 I Sheri~'s Self- Fleet Insurance Mana~emen! Total I $ 3,956,883 $ 1,287,678 $ 15,436,729 I 5,967 52,722 36,g06 16,401 69,098 158 I 1,050 1.050 95,244 95,244 3.993,789 1,406,340 15,655,001 ! 140,940 140,940 5,738,881 8,516.627 I 5,888,821 8,666,567 I (2,744,0551 (4,103,175) 3,144,766 4,563,392 I $ 3,993,789 S 4,551,106 $ 20,218.393 ! $ 55,090$ 107.g01$ 571,337 I 837,000 2,259,147 8,840 29.459 I. 892,090 107,901 2,868,783 54,704 I 4,301,301 29.221 421,230 29,221 4,777,235 I 892,090 137,122 7,646,018 I 791,352 2,366,829 I 3,101,699 3,622,632 10,205,546 3,101,699 4,413,984 12,572,375 I $ 3,993,7895 4,551,106 S 20.218,393 i 104 COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS ALL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDEO SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Office of Department Informabon Sell. Capital Projects of Technoloc. l¥ Insurance Management Revenue Operal,ng revenues; Charges for services $ 1,116.459 $ 6.108.626 $ 3,323.290 $ 2.125,773 Total operating revenues 1.116.,459 6,108.626 3,323.290 2.125.773 Operating expenses: Personal services 630,984 256,912 2.376,744 1,340.461 Operating 575,259 9.585.328 387,738 594.873 Deprec~at,on 173.529 3,757 48,023 114,812 Total operating expenses 1,379,772 9.845,997 2.812,505 2,050.146 Operating ,ncome (loss) (263,313) (3,737.371) 510.785 75,627 Non-operating revenues (expenses): Interest income 17.977 513,135 81,482 22.369 Gain (Joss) on d~sposal of fixed assets (5.755) (2,433) 5,756 Miscellaneous 1.648.056 Total non-operating revenues (expenses) 12.222 2,161.185 79.049 28,125 Income (Iossl before operating transfers (251.091) (1,576.186) 589.834 103,752 Operaling transfers. Operating transler m 10.600 7,000 Operabng transfer out (255,200) (28.000) Total operating Iranslers 10,600 (255,200) (21.000) Net income (loss) (240.491) (1,576.186) 334.634 82,752 Depreciation of contribuled assets 99.974 1,191 24.563 46.688 Increase in retained earnings (140,517) (1.574,995) 359.197 129.440 Retained earmngs at beginning of year 526,968 3,453.232 390.999 421,212 Prior-period adJUStment (see Note 22) (1,299) (70,552) (8.792) (3.678) Retained earnings as restated 525.669 3,382,680 382.207 417.534 Retained earnings at end of year $ 385.152 $ 1 ,t07.685 S 741,404 $ 546.974 105 B 6 I Sheriffs Self. Fleet Insurance Manac, lemenl Total 4,201.618 S 3.158,124 $ 20,033.890 4,201.618 3,158.124 20,033,890 I 596,268 5.201.369 3,238.264 1,484.845 15,866.307 . 924.708 1,264.829 I 3.238264 3,005.821 22,332.505 963,354 152,303 (2,298.615) I 116,164 64,640 815,767 129,837 127,405 I 1,648.050 116164 194.477 2.591,222 I I 079.518 346,780 292,607 9,000 26,600 I I105,0001 {388.200) {96,000) {361.600) I 1,079, 518 250,780 (68,993 ) 335,367 507.783 I 1.079,518 586,147 438,790 2.022.181 3.044,315 9.858.907 I {?.8301 {92,151t 2,022.181 3,036,485 9,766.756 I S 3,101,699 S 3,622.632 S 10,205.546 I I I i 106 COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS BUDGET AND ACTUAL ( BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Information Technolo~)/(Non. GAAP) Self. Insurance (Non-GAAP) Budc~et Actual Variance Budget Actual Variance Operating revenues: Charges for serv,ces $ 1,267.300 $ 1.116,459 $ (150,841) $ 8,534,300 $ 6,108.626 S (2,425.674) Total operabng revenues 1.267,300 1,116,459 (150,841) 8.534.300 6.108.626 (2,425.674) Operating expenses: Personal services 692,900 630,984 61,916 299,500 256,St 2 42.588 Operating 649.386 575,259 74,127 10,047.800 8.925.0~0 1.122,780 Capital outlay 101,294 89,828 11,466 4.100 4.~:;'8 22 Total operating expenses 1.443.580 1.296,071 147,509 10.351,400 9,186,010 1.165,390 Operat,ng ,ncome (loss) t176.280) (179.612) {3,332} (1,817.100) f3.077.384) (1.260.284) Non*operat,ng revenues (expenses): Interest ~ncome 4.000 17.977 13.977 403.100 501.71 ! 98,611 Proceeds from the disposal of fixed assets (5.755) (5,755) Proceeds from insurance claims 462,000 1,648,050 1,186,050 PrinOpal payments Total non-operating revenues (expenses): 4.000 12.222 8,222 865,100 2,149.761 1,284.661 Income (loss) before operating transfers (172,280) (167.390) 4,890 (952.000) (927.623) 24.377 Operabng transfers Operating Iransfers in 10.600 10,600 Operahng lransfers oul Total operating transfers 10,600 10,600 Net income (loss) (161.680) (156.790) 4,890 (952.000) (927,623) 24,377 Retained earnings at beg~nmng of year 253,123 526.968 273.645 6.896,100 3.453.232 (3.442.868) Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (I.299) (1,299) (70.552) (70.552) Retained earnings as restated 253.123 525.669 272,546 6,896.100 3,382,680 (3.513.420) Retained earnings at end of year $ 91,443 $ 368.879 $ 277,436 S 5,944,100 $ 2.455,057 S (3.489.043) Reconciliation: Net income (loss). (budgeta~ bas~s) $ (156,790) $ (927,623) Capitalized expenses 89,828 4,078 Principal payments 11,424 Depreciation and amortization (173,529) (3,757) Self-insurance claims payable (660,308) Loss on disposal of tixed assets Net income (loss) (GAAP bas~s) $ (240,491) S (1,576.186) 107 Off, ce of Capital Pro~ects Management (Non. GAAP) De~artmem of Revenue (Non-GAAP) Bud~let Aclual Variance Bud~let Actual Variance 2.830.300 S 3.323,290 $ 492,990 S 2.210.300 S 2,125.773 $ (84.527) 2.830,300 3.323.290 402.990 2.210.300 2.125.773 (84.527) 2.569.400 2.376,744 192,656 1,337,500 1.340.461 (2,961) 521.500 387,738 133,762 694,440 594,873 299,567 68.000 41,870 26.130 167,426 132,145 35,281 " 3,158.900 2,806,352 352.548 2.399.366 2,067,479 331,887 (328.600) 516.938 845.538 (189.066) 58,294 247.360 50.800 81.482 30,682 5,800 22,369 16,569 7.337 7.337 5.756 5.756 (27.871) (27.871) 50.800 88.819 38.019 5.800 254 (5.546) (277.800) 605,757 883,557 (183,266) 58,548 241.814 7,000 7,000 {255.2001 {255.200) {28,000) (28.000) (255.200) (255,200) {28,000) {21.000) 7.000 (533.000) 350,557 883,557 (211.266) 37.548 248,814 1,065.300 390.999 (674.301) 211,266 421,212 209,946 (8,792) (,8.792) {3,678) {3.678) 1.065.300 382,207 (683.093) 211,266 417.534 206.268 532,300 $ 732,764 $ 200,464 $ $ 455.082 $ 455.082 $ 350.557 S 37.548 41,870 132.145 27.871 (48.023) (114.812) {9,770~ $ 334,634 S 82.752 (CONTINUED) 108 Fleet Manac)ement {Non.GAAP) Total Budc, lel Actual Variance Budc, le! Actual Variance Operabng revenues: Charges for serv. ces S 3.102.800 $ 3.158.124 S 55.324 S 17.945.000 $ 15.832.272 $ (2.112.728) Total operating revenues 3.102.800 3.158.124 55.324 17.945.000 15.832.272 (2.112.728) OPeratJng expenses: Personal serwces 631.400 596.268 35.132 5.530.700 5.201.'~6q 329.331 Operating 1.521.066 1.484.845 36.221 13.634.192 11.967.735 1.666.457 Cal~tal outlay 972.984 909.516 63.468 1.313.804 1.177~,~37 136.367 Total operating expenses 3.125.450 2.990.629 134.821 20.478.696 18.346.541 2.132.155 Operabng ~ncome (loss) (22.650) 167.495 190.145 (2.533.696) (2.514.269) 19.427 Non-operal~ng revenues (expenses): lnteresl mcome 45.100 64.640 19.540 508.800 688.179 179.379 Proceeds from the disposal of fixed assets 64.400 156.108 91,708 64.400 163.446 99.046 Proceeds from insurance claims 462.000 1.648.050 1.186.050 Pnnopal payments {27.871 ) (27.871.00) Total non-operabng revenues (expenses): 109.500 220.748 111.248 1.035.200 2.471.804 1.436.604 Income (loss) before operating transfers 86.850 388.243 301.393 (1.498.496) (42.465) 1.456.031 Operating transfers: Operating transfers in 9.000 9.000 10.600 26.600 16.000 Operating transfers out (105.000) (105.000) {388.200.1' t388.200) Total operating transfers { 105.000) (96.000) 9.000 1377.600~ (361.600) 16.000 Net income (loss) (18.150) 292.243 310.393 (1.876.096) (404.065) 1.472.031 Retained earnings at beginmng of year 881.500 3.044.315 2.162.815 9.307.289 7.836.726 (1.470.563) Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (7.830.), {7.8301 (92.151 ) (92.151 ) Retained earnings as restaled 881.500 3.036.485 2.154.985 9.307.289 7.744.575 (1.562.714) Retained earnings at end of year $ 863.350 $ 3.328.728 $ 2.465.378 $ $7.431.193 $ 7.340.510 $ {90.683) Reconciliation: Net income (loss) - (budgetary basis) $ 292.243 $ (404.065) Capitalized expenses 909.516 1.177.437 PnnOpal payments 39.295 Depreoabon and amortization (924.708) (1.264.829) Self.insurance claims payable (660.308) Loss on disposal of fixed assets (26.271 ) (36.04 1 ) Net income (loss) (GAAP bas~s) S 250.780 S {1.148.511) 109 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS ALL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Office of Department Information Self- Capital Projects of Technoloc~¥ Insurance Management Revenue Cash flows from operating acbvit~es Cash rec~ved from o~er funds for goods and serv~ces $ 1.216.640 $ 6.108,907 $ 3,323,132 $ 2.121.174 Cash received from retirees tor senaces Cash payments for goods and services (589,756) (8,683.558) (422,469) (584.801) Cash payments Io employees (648.046) (258.738) (2.431.306) 11,358.864) Net cash provmded by lused for) operating activities (21,162) (2,833,389) 469,357 177,509 Cash flows from noncap~tal financing acbvmties: Cash transfers from other funds 10,600 7.000 Cash Iransfers to other funds (255,200) (28.000) Proceeds from insurance refunds/reimbursements 1,648.050 Net CaSh prowded by (used for) noncap~tal financing activities 10,600 1.648.050 (255.200) (21,000) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets (5.755) 7.337 5,756 Payments for capital ao~u,sitions (64.073) (4.078) (41,870) (132.145) PrinOpal payments o~ cap~tal leases I27,871) Net cash (used for) cap,tat and related financing acbvihes (89.828) (4.078) (34.533) (164.260) Cash flow from investing acbwt,es: Inlerest and dividends on investments 17.661 501,711 78,678 21.685 Net cash provided by ~nvesbng activities 17,661 501,711 78.678 21,685 Net increase (decrease) mn cash (82,729) (687.706) 258.302 23,934 Cash. October 1. 1996 326.188 8,576.680 1.482,428 379.392 Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (1.299) (70,5.52) (8,792) (3.678) Cash, October 1, 1996 as restated 324,889 8,506,128 1.473.636 375,714 Cash. September30. 1997 $ 242.160 $ 7,818.422 $ 1,731.938 S 399.648 110 ! I S~edffs Self- Fleet I Insurance Manac.~emenl Total $ 4.092.886 S 3.165.100 $ 20.027,839 I 71.826 71,826 (2.993,360) (1.449.233) (14.723.177) (619,026) (5.315,980) I 1.171,352 1,096,841 60,508 I 9,000 26,600 (105,000) (388,200) 1,648,050 I (96,000) 1 I 156.108 163.446 (909,518) (1.171,684) (27.871 ) I {753,410) I1.036.109) I 116.164 61,798 797.697 116.164 61.798 797,697 I 1.287,516 309.229 1,108.646 2,669.367 986,279 14,420.334 (7.830~ {92,151) 2,669,367 978,449 14.328,183 3.956.883 $ 1,287,678 $ 15,436,729 (CONTINUED) 111 COL.E. COUNt. F'OR,D^ COMBf.,.G ST^TEME.T O. C^S. FLOW. AJ..L INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES Off, ce of Department Informat,on Self- Cap, Iai Prolects of TechnoIoc, l,v Insurance Management Revenue Operabng income (loss) $ (263.313) $ (3.737.371) $ 510.785 S 75.627 Adjustments 1o reconcile operating income ID net cash provided by operabng act, wries: Del3reC~ation ex;)ense 173.529 3.757 48.023 114.812 (Increase) decrease ~rt accounts receivable (779) (1.611 ) (4.599~ (Increase) decrease ~n due from other funds 100.960 281 (158) Increase (decrease) ~n due Io olher funds 122 (281) (441 (Decrease) ~n due Io olher governments (Increase) in advances and deposits Decrease ,n ,nventory Increase (decrease) ,n vouchers r. ayable ( 14.619) 243.354 (34.731 ) 10.116 (Decrease) in accrtJed wages (10.176) (2.618) (34.460) ( 18.245) Increase (decrease) ,n compensated absences (6.886) 792 (20.102) (158) Increase in self-~nsurance c. Jaims paya~)le 660.308 Total adjustments 242.151 903.982 (41.428) 101.882 Net cash prov*ded by (used fo~) operat,r~g actwit,es $ (21.162} S (2.833.389) $ 469.357 S 177.509 Non-cash invest,ng, capEtal, and finan~ng activities: The Department of Revenue Fund rece,ved contributions of assets from various funds w~th a depreciated value of S135.516. The original cost of these assets was $334.672 w~th $199.156 in accumulated depreciation. 112 Sheriffs Self- Fleet Insurance Manac, lement Total $ 963.354 $ 152.303 $ (2.298.615t 924.708 1.264.829 (36.906) 1.630 (42.265) 5.346 106.429 (203) (13,733l (13,7331 (40) (401 24.348 24.348 46.904 11.304 262.328 (8.523) (74.022) (502) (26.856) 198.000 858.308 207.998 944.538 2.359.123 $ 1.171.352 S 1,096.841 S 60.508 113 6 FIDUCIARY FUNDS MAJOR EXPENDABLE TRUSTS CONFISCATED PROPERTY TRUST FUND - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF CONFISCATED PROPERTY TO BE USED FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES. LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING TRUST FUND - TO ACCOUNT FOR THE COURT FINES ASSESSED TO BE USED FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING PURPOSES. GAC LAND SALES, ROADS AND CANALS TRUST FUND - TO ACCOUNT FOR APPRC~×!MATELY ONE MILLION THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,300.000) IN PRINCIPAL AND SETTLEMENT FEES RECEIVED FROM A 1977 SETTLEMENT WITH GAC PROPERTIES, INC.. AND INTEREST THEREON TO BE EXPENDED FOR THE RESTORATION AND MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN UNACCEPTED ROADS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AREA TO DEVELOP FACILITIES OTHER THAN ROADS AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AREA. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REMAINING FIDUCIARY FUNDS: EXPENDABLE TRUSTS ANIMAL CONTROL COUNTY DRUG ABUSE PUBLIC LIBRARY CRIMINAL JUSTICE STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION LAW LIBRARY IMPACT FEES ESCROW INMATE WELFARE UTILITY FEE AGENCY DEFERRED COMPENSATION CLERK OF COURTS SHERIFF PROPERTY APPRAISER TAX COLLECTOR DEPOSITS PINE RIDGE AND NAPLES PRODUCTION PARK I EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS Ammel Pubhc Law Inmete Couilf~ Cnmmn~l Stale Cash and mv~l~ts $ 73.~2 $ ~,~3 $ 40,~ $ 395,224 $ 4,677 $ 35.8~ ~ InveSl~s w~ R~wa~ I fllefesl 339 181 ~ 4 ~ ~ Due from o~r fu~s 276 559 ~.7~ Invenlo~ Tolalas~s $ 74281 $ 36274 $ 40,841 $ 395.~ $ 5.2~ $ 63.037 $ ~.1~ Lia~ht~s V~m~a~a~als $ 1.~6 $ 47~ $ 11.186 $ $ S S 125,591 D~ m o~ ~s 6,692 1~.539 Defe~ ~n~t~ ~ya~e Defeff~ Refundable Due lo s~al as~ss~t ~d~s To~I ha~ht~s I .~ 4 7~ 11.186 6.692 Fund ~n~ Re~ f~ Tmsl fund ~s 73,215 31.4~ ~.655 ~8.808 5,2~ 63.037 Total ~ ~la~s 73.215 31.4~ ~.655 ~8.~8 5.2~ 63.037 Totalha~ht~s and ffu~ bala~s S 74.281 S ~.274 S ~.~1 S , 395.~ S 5.~ S 63,037 S I (CONTINUED) I I I m 114 COU,ER COU. . FLOR,0^ U.OS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 EX~ENDASLE TRUST FUNDS AGE~Cv L~ C~fi~t~ Enfor~n~ GAC La~ Sales. Im~ F~s ~ Pro~ Tra,n,~ Roa~s a~ Canals E~ Cash a~n~t~ts $ 351,028 $ ~33~ $ 322,444 $ 971,989 $ 635,5~3 ~ $ 4.~8.~ Investors ~t~ t~st~ R~wables Interest I .Gg8 85 1.575 4,478 3.028 ~t 2,924 ~.~ Due fr~ o~ ~s 835 Invent~ I.~7,914 T~lass~s S 355.6~ S 14270 S 1.331.933 S 976.467 S e~.e~ S 6~'181 S 6.351.721 Llabiht~s Vou~s ~ya~ and a~uals S I0,5~ $ ~ 2~3 $ S 1.~3 S S 7,470 Due to o~ fu~s 3 ~0 ~ 3~.~8 D~ Io o~ ~m~nls 1 522.~3 Defe~ ~1~ ~yab~ 6,097.181 1.383,515 Defe~ r~ 1 ,~7.914 RefundabM ~*ls 707 3.~0,~5 E~ ~ct f~s 461.574 Due to s~al as~ss~nt ~nd~ders Tolal ha~ht~es 14.4~ 1.~8.9~ 461,574 I.~3 6,~7,181 6,351,721 Fund balan~s Resem~ f~ Trust fund ~r~ses ~ 1.192 14,270 322.975 514,893 8~.~8 Total fund ~lan~s ~ I. 192 14,270 322,975 514,893 Total ha~hl~s and fund helen, s $ 355.6~ $ 14,270 $ 1,331.933, $ 976,467 I 115 I ~-- n~n - - [ [[[[ I1[111 Il Ill II1111 .......................... ][[[ [I ! I IAGENCY FUNDS Ptne R,dge Properly Tax and Naples I Sheriff Appra[se~ Co~lecto~ Oepos~ls Production par~ Total $ 80.181 $ $ 2.986.269 $ 1.372.664 $ 6.027.708 $ 18,606.179 I 2.709.505 805.598 1,005.793 12.001.592 5.724 33.732 51.279 895 11.998 215.817 514 6.889 9 3.5.850 I 1.007.914 $ 2.790.200 $ 805.598 $ 3.999.846 $ 1.378.3.~8 $ 6073447 $ 31.918631 I I $ 47.71.5 $ $ 686.315 $ 1,395 $ $ 900.326 32.980 552.101 225.632 1.384,196 1,753.637 3,27,5.980 2,709,505 80.5,598 1.005,793 12,001.592 I 1,007.914 1.151.361 4.192.163 461.574 6.073.447 6.073.447 I 1.376.388 6.073.447 29.297.192 2.790200 805.598 3,999.846 2.621.439 2,621.439 2.790.200 $ 605.598 $ 3.999.846 $ 1.378.388 $ 6.073.447 $ 31.918.631 I i 116 COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL. YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 · EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS I · Ammal Pubhc Law Inmate County Cnm, nal · Control L~bran/ Librar~ Welfare Druc~ Abuse Jusbce Revenues: m Taxes S 9.765 $ S $ $ Licenses and permits 2'1,055 Charges Ira' services 94,635 Fines and fode~lures 3,173 331.116 Interest income 4,230 3,663 173 7,92;. · Miscellaneous 13,108 2,066 252,359 Total revenues 35,050 16,771 96.701 252,359 3.346 33.c,038 m · Expendilures: I General govemmen! 89.251 Pubhc salety 117.849 Transpor~abon Human serv,ces 31,795 m Culture and reC~eabon 63,482 Total expenddures 31.795 63.482 89.251 117.849 I Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures 3,255 (46,711 ) 7,450 134,510 3,346 339.038 I Other finanOng sources (uses): Operating Iransters m · Operating translers out (386,000) Total other financing sources (uses) (386.000) I Excess of revenues and other financ- ing sources over (under) expen- ditures and other finanong (uses) 3,255 (46.711) 7,450 134,510 3.346 (46,962) Fund balances a! beginning of year 70,574 78.874 46.176 254.298 1,979 110.203 Prior.period adlustrnenl (see Note 22) (614) (673) (23.971) (69) (204) m m Fund balances as restated 69,960 78,201 22.205 254,298 1,910 109.999 Fund balances at end ol year $ 73,215 $ 31.490 S 29,655 $ 388.808 S 5,256 $ 63.037 · m I 117 I I I EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS Slate Coud Contr~scated Enforcement GAC Land Sales. Iml3ac! Fees Utility Admimstrat[on Property Traimn~l Road and Canals Escrow Fee Total I $ $ S $ $ S 781.905 S 791.670 21.055 94,635 I 126.169 14.188 474,646 21,794 1,859 21,590 56,970 29.006 147.207 8,256 275.789 I 147,963 16,047 29.846 56,970 810.911 1.805.002 I 2.070.902 289,065 2.449.218 785.059 38.915 42.185 984,008 80.665 80.665 I 31.795 63.482 2.855.961 38.915 42,185 80,665 289,065 3,609.168 I I (2.855,961) 109.048 (26.138) (50,819) 56,970 521.846 {1.804.166) I 3,020.560 3.020,500 (164.539~ I85.912) (93,0001 (729,451) I 2.855.961 ¢85.912) {93.000) 2.291.049 23.136 (26,138) (50,819) 56,970 428.846 486.883 322.620 40.728 377.905 464,420 408.090 2,175,867 {4,564~ (320) (4,111) 16.4971 (288) (41,311) 318.056 40,408 373.794 457.923 407.802 2,134.556 341,192 $ 14.270 $ 322,975 S 514.893 $ 836.648 $ 2,621.439 I i 118 EXPEND LE TRUST FUNDS EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS Ammal Control Public L~brary Budc,,let Aclual Variance EJdc, let Actual Variance Revenues: Taxes $ 8.000 $ 9.765 $ 1.765 S $ S L~censes and permits 20.000 21.055 1.055 Fsnes and fode~tures Interest income 3.700 4.230 530 3,000 3.663 663 Msscellaneous 14.000 13.108 (892) Total revenues 31.700 35.050 3.350 17,000 16.771 (229) E x penditures General government Pubhc safely Transportation Human services 46,500 31,795 14.705 Culture and recreal~on 82.000 63,482 18,518 Total expenditures 46,500 31.795 14.705 82.000 63,482 18.518 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures (14.800) 3.255 18,055 (65,000) (46,711) 18,289 Other financing sources (uses) Operating transfers out Total offter finanong sources (uses) Excess of revenues and other financ- ing sources over (under) expen- d;tures and other financing (uses) (14.800) 3.255 18.055 (65,000) (46,711) 18.289 Fund balances at beginning of year 66,300 70.574 4,274 71.600 78.874 7.274 Prior-period adlustment (see Note 22) (614 ) (614) (673) (673) Fund balances as restated 66.300 69,960 3 660 71,600 78,201 6.601 Fund balances at end of year $ 51.500 $ 73,215 $ 21.715 $ 6,600 $ 31,490 $ 24.890 119 I EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS I Count~ Dru~l Abuse Criminal Justwce I Budc~el Actua! Vanance Budc~et Actual Variance I S S S S S S 1,500 3.173 1.673 290,000 331.116 41.116 I 200 173 (27) 300 7.922 7.622 I 1.700 3.346 1,646 290.300 339.038 48,738 1.700 3.346 1,646 290,300 339.038 48.738 (386.000) (386,000) (386.000} (386,0001 1,700 3,346 1.646 (95.700) (46.962) 48,738 9,900 1.979 (7.921 ) 95,700 110,203 14.503 (69) (69) (204) (204) 9,900 1.910 (7.990) 95,700 109.999 14,299 11,600 $ 5.256 $ (6.344) $ $ 63,037 $ 63,037 (CONTINUED) 120 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS I Confiscated Pro0erl), Law Enforcement Tratmn~ Budc~et Actual Vanance Budget Actual Variance Revenues: i Taxes $ $ S $ S $ Ltcenses and permits Fines and forfeitures 126,169 126,169 30,000 14,188 (15,812) Interest income 10.000 21.794 11.794 800 1,859 1,059 M~scellaneous I Tolal revenues 10,000 147.963 137,963 30,800 16047 (14,7531 I Expenditures: General government · Pubhc safety 39,000 38,915 85 61.300 42,185 19,115 Transportabon Human sen/ices Culture and recreatron m I Total expenditures 39.000 38.915 85 61,300 42,185 19.115 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures (29,000) 109,048 138.048 (30,500) (26,138) 4.362 Other linan~ng sources (uses): I Operating transfers out I164.682t (85.912) 78.770 - Total other finanong sources m (uses) (164.682) (85.912) 78.770 im Excess of revenues and other financ- · i lng sources over (under) expert- ditures and other financing (uses) (193,682) 23.136 216,818 (30.500) (26,138) 4.362 Fund balances at begfnn~ng of year 322.120 322.620 500 30.500 40.728 10.228 m Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (4.564) (4.564) (320) (320) I Fund balances as resated 322.120 318.056 (4.064) 30.500 40,408 9,908 Fund balances at end of year $ 128,438 $ 341,192 S 212.754 $ $ 14.270 S 14.270 m I I I 121 I m EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS I GAC Land Sales. Roads and Canals Utility Fee m Budc, let Actual Variance Budc~et Actual Variance m $ $ s $ 660.500 $ 781.905 s 121.405 m 20.300 21.590 1.290 29.006 29.006 95.300 8.256 (87.0441 m 115.600 29.846 (85754) 660.500 810.911 150.411 m 359.200 289.065 70.135 140.899 80.665 50.234 ! 140.899 80.665 60.234 359.200 289.065 70.135 I (25.299) (50.819) (25.520) 301.300 521.846 220.546 I (93.000) (93,000) m (93.000) (93,000) m (25.299) (50.819) (25.520) 208.300 428.846 220.546 m 396.599 377.905 (18.694) (33.000) 408.090 441.090 (4.111 ) (4.111 ) (288) (288) m 396.599 373.794 (22.805) (33.000) 407.802 440.802 $ 371.300 $ 322.975 s (48.325)$ 175.300 s 836.648 $ 661.348 m (CONTINUED) I m m 122 Total Budc. let Actual Variance Revenues: Taxes $ 668.500 S 791.670 $ 123.170 Licenses and perm,ts 20.000 21,055 1.055 Fmnes and fodeffures 321.500 474.646 153,146 Interest income 38.300 90,237 51.937 Miscellaneous 109.300 21,364 (87.936) Total revenues t ,157.600 1.398.972 241,372 E xpend~tures: General government 359.200 289,065 70,135 Public sa feb/ 100.300 81,100 19.200 Transportal~on 140.899 80.665 60.234 Human services 46.500 31.795 14.705 Culture and rec~eabon 82.000 63.482 18, 518 Total expenditures 728.899 545.107 182.792 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures 428.701 852.865 424,164 Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers out (643.682) (564.912) 78.770 Total other financing sources (uses) (643.682) (564.9121 78.770 Excess of revenues and other financ- ing sources over (under) expen- ditures and olher financing (uses) (214,981) 287.953 502,934 Fund balances al beginning of year 959.719 1,410,973 451,254 Prior-period adjuslmenl (see Note 22) (10,643) (10,843) Fund balances as restated 959.719 1.400,130 440,411 Fund balances at end of year $ 744.738 $ 1.688,083 $ 943.345 123 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Balan~ Balan~ Octo~r 1, 1~ Addib~s ~letions September 30. I~7 ~se~: Invest~n~ ~t~ trustee ~ 4.522,501 ~ 1.728.311 5 153,631 5 6.097,181 Liabilibes: ~ferr~ ~n~b~ payable S 4.522,501 S 1,728.311 S 153,631 S 6,097,181 Cash and mvesl~n~ $ 4,109.597 $ 61.244.771 $ ~.3~.162 S 4.~8.2~ ~e fr~ o~er funds 58.243 58.243 ~e from o~er g~em~n~s 4.478 4,478 Invent~ Total assets S 5.385.483 $ 61.532.311 $ ~ ~6.07~ $ 6.351.721 L~abilibes: Vou~ers payable and a~uals S 22,335 S 46.268.282 $ 46.283,147 $ 7,470 Due to other ~unds 44.178 4,~, 12g 4.152.~9 398.298 Due to ome~ ~em~n~ 887,813 39.243.556 38.~.026 1.522,~3 Deferred ~m~nsabon payable 1.213,165 287,~0 117.1~ 1.383.515 Refundable de~ls 3.217.992 17.673.915 17,851.812 3.040.095 To~al habd~bes ~ 5.385.483 S 107.979.422 5 107.g13.1~ ~ 6.351.721 ~sels: Cash and investments S 103,896 S 2,~.731 $ 2.924.446 S 80.181 Investmen~ wffh trustee 1.~5,879 1,071.518 207,892 2.709.~5 Due from olher funds 1,605 514 1 ,~5 514 Total assam S 1,951.380 S 3.972.763 S 3,133,~3 S 2,7~,2~ Liabilities: V~ers payable and ac~als S 59.414 S 514.~5 $ 526.5~ $ 47,715 Due to other funds 46.087 317.7~ 330.813 32.980 ~fe~ed ~m~nsatlon payable 1 .~5,879 1,071.518 207.892 2.709.~5 Total habd~tms 5 1,951.380 5 1,~.089 S 1.~5,269 5 2,7~.200 ~se~: Investmen~ ~tb t~stee 5 658,741 ~ 167.~0 ~ 20.98~ ~ ~5,598 Liabilibes: Deferre~ ~m~nsat~on payable 5 658.741 ~ 167,~0 ~ 20.98~ ~ ~5.59~ (CO~INUED} ~24 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES II~.~,SSETS AND LIABILITIES ALL AGENCY FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 Balance Balance October 1. 1996 Additions Delebons SeDtember 30. 1997 Ta.,._CoUect~ Assets: Cash and ~nvestments $ 2.475.162 S 320.092.673 S 319.581.566 $ 2.986.269 Investments w~th trustee 837.753 215.209 47.169 1 005.793 Recewable: Other 2.865 1.970 895 Due from other lunds 4.000 2,889 6.889 Total assets $ 3.319.780 $ 320.310.771 $ 319.630.705 $ 3.999.846 L~abddmS: Vouchers payable and accruals $ 268.729 $ 11.635.653 $ 11.216.067 $ 688.315 Due to other funds 593.061 100.178.249 100.219.208 552.102 Due to other governments 1 620.237 213.458.156 213.324.757 1.753.636 Deferred compensahon payable 837.753 215.209 47.169 1.005 793 Total habdlheS S 3.319.780 S 325.487.267 S 324.807.201 $ 3.999.846 Assets: Cash and ~nvestments S 967.244 S 725.383 S 319.963 S 1.372.664 Receivable: Interest 2.919 5.724 2.919 5.724 Total assets 5 970.163 $ 731.107 $ 322.882 $ 1.378.388 L~abihbes: Vouchers payable and accruals S 430 $ 301.692 S 300.727 S 1.395 Due to other funds 165.011 69.166 8.545 225.632 Refundable deposits 804.722 663.695 317.056 I, 151.361 TOtal habd~hes $ 970.163 $ 1.034.553 S 626.328 $ 1.378.388 ~ne_Ei~e_and.t~a~les P~uc~on_P_a[~ Assets: Cash and inveslments S 5,362.076 $ 5,651,276 $ 4,985,644 S 6.027,708 Recewable: Interest 11.347 385,282 362,897 33.732 Special assessments 603 2.512.656 2.501.261 11.998 Due from other funds 12.618 155.331 167.940 9 Total assets $ 5.386.644 S 8.704.545 S 8.017.742 $ 6.073.447 Liabilities: Due to special assessment bondholders $ 5,386.644 $ 2,953,692 $ 2,266.889 $ 6.073.447 Totalliabilihes $ 5.386.644 $ 2,953,692 $ 2,266,889 $ 6.073.447 a25 - - ,nj M,[ ............... I I COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA 6' B COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ALL AGENCY FUNDS I FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Balance Balance October 1. 1996 Additions Deletions September 30, 1997 Assets: Cash and ~nvestments $ 13.017.975 $ 390.614.834 S 388,197.781 S 15.435.028 I Investments vath trustee 9.078,039 3,470,418 546.865 12.001,592 Recetvables. Inlerest 14.266 391.006 365.816 39.456 Speoal assessments 603 2,512.656 2,501.261 11.998 I Other 2.865 1.970 895 Due from other funds 76,466 158.734 227.788 7,412 Due from other governments 4.478 4.478 Totalassets $ 22.194,692 $ 397.147.648 $ 391.845.959 $ 27.496.381 I Liabdff~es: VOuchers payable and accruals S 350.908 S 58.720.492 S 58.326.505 S 744,895 I Due to other funds 848,337 105.071.250 104,7 f 0.575 1.209,012 Due fo other governments 2.508.050 252.701.712 251.933.783 3.275.979 Deferred compensabon payable 9.078,039 3.470.418 546.865 12.001.592 Refundable deposits 4.022.714 18.337.610 18.168.868 4.191.456 I DUe lo speoal assessment bondholders 5,386.644 2.953,692 2.266.889 6,073.447 Total habd~bes S 22.194.692 S 441.255.174 S 435.953.485 S 27.496.381 I ! ! I I I I i 126 , ~ - iii ,i. ................. I IIIIIII II --- I I GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT GROUP THIS SELF BALANCING GROUP OF ACCOUNTS IS USED TO ACCOUNT FOR THOSE FIXED ASSETS UTILIZED IN THE PERFORMANCE OF GENERAL GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS AND EXCLUDES THE FIXED ASSETS OF PROPRIETARY FUNDS. m m m ! I I I m m COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA SCHEDULE OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS BY CLASSIFICATION AND SOURCE SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Board of County Commiss~'~ers Shenlf Totals General Fixed Assets Land S 29,635.988 S S 29.635,g~S Build~ngs 95.386.402 95,386.o:02 Improvements other than buildings, 36,312,074 36,312.074 Equ~pmen! 34.922,137 20.240.020 55,162,157 Co~struCl~ort in progress 8.040,764 8,040.764 Total general fixed assets S 204.297,365 S 20.240,020 S 224.537.385 Inveslmen! ~n C, eneral Fixed Assel$ Prior to 10/1/84 (umdenlified) $ 33.257.218 $ 686.801 $ 33.944.019 10/1/84 lo 9/30/88 57.998.505 3.794.674 61.793.179 After 10/1188 from General fund 19.643.899 14,736.586 34.380.485 Special revenue funds 25.024,391 25.024.391 General obhgat~o~ bonds 7.856,949 7.856.949 Revenue bonds 59,091.466 59.091.466 Federal ami State grant funds 66.086 1.021.959 1.088,045 Proprietary funds 581,336 581.336 Develofler customer corltnbuflOfl$ for enterprise funds 777,515 777,515 Total ~nvestmenl in general fixed assel$ $ 204,297.365 $ 20.240.020 $ 224.537,385 127 I COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA SCHEDULE OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS I BY FUNCTION AND CLASSIFICATION SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 ! I Improvements Other Than Land Buildin~ls Buildings ,, EquiF~nent Total I Board of County Comm,ss~Oners C, er, eral govemmen! $ 11.653.242 S 43.955.948 $ 2,884,608 $ 11.009.878 $ 69,503.676 Pubhc safety 329,415 23.583,146 355.940 10.779,105 35.047,606 I PhysiCal enwronmen! 1.364.487 1,426.? 11 4,462,376 1.726,938 8.980,512 Transpoflabo~ 9,29 ~ ,371 664 .g27 22.919 2.679.127 12.658.344 Econom$c enwronmenl 43,153 43.1.53 Human serwces 189.592 11.101,069 14.808 685,054 11.990.523 I Culture and recreabon 6.807.881 14,654,601 28.571,423 7,998,882 58.032.787 Co~strucbon ,n progress 8,040.764 8.040.764 Total Board of County Commissioners $ 29,635,988 $ 103,427.166 $ 36.312.074 $ 34.922.137 $ 204.297.365 Sheriff: I Public safety $ $ S $ 20,240.020 $ 20.240.020 Total Sheriff S $ $ $ 20.240.020 $ 20.240.020 I Total General F~xed ,assets General government $ 11.653,242 S 43.955,948 $ 2.884.608 $ 1 t,009.878 $ 69.503.676 I Pul~c safety 329,415 23.583,146 355.940 31.019,125 55,267.626 Pttys~:al environment 1.364,487 1.426.711 4.462.376 1.726.938 8.980.512 Transportabon 9.291.371 664.927 22.919 2,679,127 12.658.344 Economic environmenl 43.153 43.153 I Human services 189,592 11,101.069 14,808 685.054 11.990.523 Culture and recreabon 6.807.881 14.654.601 28,571.423 7.998,882 58.032.787 Construction in progress 8.040,764 8.040,764 I Totalgeneralfixed assets $ 29,635,988 S 103.427,166 S 36.312.074 S 55.162.157 $ 224.537,385 I I I I 128 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS BY FUNCTION I FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 Fixed Assets Transfers Transfers Fixed Assets 10/1/96 Adddlons Deletions In Out Board o{ County Commlss~o,'~ers Generalgo~emmen! $ 69.500.121 $ 1.680.472 S 673.248 S 41.774 S 1.04.~.~3 $ 69.503.676 Pubhc safety 33.734.065 934.215 105.910 670.954 155 718 35.047.606 I~.al efl~ronmen! 8.507.908 433.099 20.495 8.980.512 Transportation 12.823.167 7' ;'8.214 943.037 12.658.344 Eco~K)m~c env~ro~'~nen! 38.889 6.263 1.999 43.153 Human sen~ces 11.977.806 15.026 3.909 1.600 11.990.523 Culture and reoeatlon 54.453.420 1.510.851 589.103 2.657.619 58.032.787 Co~struct~3n in ~'ogress 8.876.535 3.636.421 1.139.748 3.332.444 8.040.764 Total Board o~ County Co~mtssloners S 199.971.911 S 8.994.561 S 3.477.449 S 3.371.947 $ 4.563.605 S 204.297.365 Shellff Public safeW $ 18.312.359 $ 2.763.076 $ 835.415 5 $ $ 20.240.020 Total Sheriff $ 18.312.359 S 2763076 $ 835.415 5 $ S 20.240.020 Total C~eneral Fixed Assets General government $ 69.5(X).121 S 1.680.472 $ 673.248 $ 41.774 $ 1.045.443 $ 69.503.676 Public salety 52.046.424 3.697.291 941.325 670.954 185.718 55.287.626 Pl~ys~--.al environment 8.567.908 433.099 20.495 8.980.512 Transponatio~ 12.823.16 ? 778.214 94 3.037 12.658.344 Economic env~ronmen! 38.889 6.263 1.999 43.153 Human serwces 11.977.806 15.026 3.909 1.600 11.990.523 Culture and rec~eahon 54.453.420 1.510.851 589.103 2.657.619 58.032.787 Conslruction in progress 8.876.535 3.636.421 1.139.7'48 3.332.444 8.040.764 Total general fixed assets $ 218.2~4.270 $ 11.757.637 $ 4.312.864 $ 3.371.947 $ 4.563.605 $ 224.537.385 I 129 I I GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT ACCOUNT GROUP THIS SELF BALANCING GROUP OF ACCOUNTS IS USED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE UNMATURED LONG-TERM INDEBTEDNESS OF THE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT THAT IS NOT A SPECIFIC LIABILITY OF ANY PROPRIETARY FUND OR TRUST FUND. GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT INCLUDES LIABILITIES ARISING FROM DEBT ISSUANCES AS WELL AS NONCURRENT LIABILITIES ON CAPITALIZED LEASE OBLIGATIONS AND ACCRUED COMPENSATED ABSENCES THAT ARE NOT CURRENT LIABILITIES PROPERLY RECORDED IN GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS. ! I COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SCHEDULE OF GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Board of Clerk of County C~rcu~t Properly Tax Super'wso~' Comm~ssroners Court Sheriff Appraiser Collector of Elections Total ~.OUNT AVAILABLE AND TO BE PRQYJD~[~t'~ PA¥~IF. HT. OF_ - BIJGAT. JQN S Amount available in debt service funds fo~: General obligation bonds S 88,980 $ $ $ $ $ $ 88.980 Revenue bonds and cerbficales of indebtedness 9, 315,305 9, 315.305 Commercial pal)er loan payable 15,160 15.160 Noles payable 71,559 71.559 Total amount available in debt service funds 9.491.004 9.491.004 Amount to be provided for retirement of general long-term debt: General obligation bonds 6.011,020 6.011.020 Revenue bonds and certificates of indebtedness 52.159,695 52,159,695 Commercial paper loan payable 5,644.840 5,644,840 Notes payable 64,526 64,526 Arbitrage rebate liability 15.483 15,483 Capitalized lease obligatwons 1.480,068 243,768 f, 723,836 Accrued compensated absences 2.212.394 335,303 3.759,043 270,838 334,915 37,987 6,950.480 Total amount to be prO~ded for the retiremenl of general Iong.lerm debt 67.588,026 335,303 3.759,043 270,838 578,683 37.987 72.569,880 Total amount available and to be provided $ 77,079,030 S 335,303 $ 3,759,043 S 270,838 $ 578,683 $ 37,987 $ 82.060,884 GEL"1 - F. BT General obligation bonds $ 6,100,000 $ $ S $ $ $ 6.100,000 Revenue bonds and certificales of indebtedness 61,475,000 61,475.000 Commercial paper loan payable 5.660,000 5,680.000 Notes payable 68,785 68.785 Accounts payable 67.300 67.300 Arbitrage rebate liability 15,483 15.483 Capitalized lease obligabons 1.480,068 243.768 1,723.836 Accrued compensated absences 2.212,394 335.303 3,759,043 270.838 334.915 37.987 6,950.480 Tolalgenerallong.termdebt S 77.079.030 $ 335,303 $ 3.759,043 S 270.838 $ 578.683 $ 37.987 $ 82.060.884 130 Balance Balance 10; 1/96 Issued Retired Daf eased 9'30/97 Boa~d_~f CQunty CQI33.q~ls$ton~$ General Obhgalion Bonds: 1989 Marco Island limited general obligation bonds $ 2.275,000 S S 510.000 $ S 1.765.000 1996 Parks general obhgatlon refunding bonds 4.965.000 630.000 4.335.000 Total general oDligatlon bonds 7.240.000 - 1.140,000 6.100.000 Revenue bonds and certificates of indebledness: 1973 Improvement revenue certificates 2.095.000 250.000 1 845.000 1992 Capital improvement revenue refund,rig bonds 7,480,000 265.000 7 215.000 1994 Capital improvement revenue refunding bonds 30.415.000 30 415.000 1995 Road improvement revenue rel'undlng bonds 5.450,000 290,000 5,160.000 1996 Guaranteed entitlement revenue refunding bonds 2.145,000 175.000 1.970.000 1997 Special obligabons revenue refunding bonds 13,000,000 13.000.000 1997 Naples stormwater assessmen! bonds 1,870,000 1 870.000 Total revenue bonds and cerbficates of indebtedness 47.585.000 14.870.000 980,000 61,475 000 Other general long-term hab,htles Commercial paper loan payable 19.287.000 4.800,000 3.810.000 14.617,000 5.660,000 1993 I-I note payable 91.714 22.929 68.785 1993 J.1 note payable 99.875 46.481 53.394 Accounts payable 67.300 67.300 Arbitrage rebate liability 4.079 11,404 15.483 Capi/ahzed lease obligations 26.000 1.550,945 96,877 1,480.068 Accrued compensated absences 2,677.585 465,191 2.212.394 Total other general long.term debt 22,186,253 6.429,649 4.441,478 14.670.394 9.504.030 Total Board of County Commissioners 77,011,253 21,299,649 6,561,478 14,670.394 77 079.030 Clerk of Circuit Court Accrued compensated absences 478.947 143,644 335.303 Total Clerk of Circuit Court 478.947 143,644 335.303 (CONTINUED) 131 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 Balance 6alance 1011/96 Issued Retired Defeased 9/30,'97 Accrued compensated absences $ 3,890.181 $ $ 131.138 $ $ 3.759.043 Total Shenff 3.890.181 131,138 3.759.043 Accrued compensated absences 249.690 21.148 270.838 Total Property Appraiser 249.690 21.148 270.838 Cap~tahzed lease obhgat~ons 354.997' 111.229 243.768 Accrued compensated absences 329.350 5.565 334.915 Total Tax Collecto~ 6~4.347 5.565 111.229 578.683 ,~u~rw socoLElect~ons Accrued compensated absences 36.232 1.7.55 37.987 Total Supecwso~ of Elections 36.232 1.75.5 37.987 Total $ 82.350.650 $ 21.328.117 $ 6.947.489 S 14.670.394 $ 82.060.884 Total general long-term debt 1989 Marco Island hmded general obligat,on bonds $ 2.275.000 $ $ 510.000 S S 1.765.000 1996 Parks general obhgat~on refunding bonds 4.96.5.000 630.000 4.335 000 1973 Improvement revenue certificates 2.09.5.000 250.000 1.845 000 1992 Capital improvement revenue refunding bonds 7.480.000 26.5.000 7.215 000 1994 Capital improvement revenue refunding bonds 30.415.000 30.415 000 199.5 Road ~mprovemenl revenue refunding bonds 5.450.000 290.000 5.160 000 1996 Guaranteed enlitlement revenue refunding bonds 2.145.000 175.000 1.970 000 1997 SpecJal obhgat~on revenue refunding bonds 13.000.000 13.000 000 1997 Naples stormwaler assessmen! bonds 1.670.000 1.870 000 Commeroal paper loan payable 19.287.000 4.800.000 3.810.000 14.617.000 5.660.000 1993 I-1 note payable 91.714 22.929 68.785 1993 J-1 note payable 99.875 46.481 53.394 Accounts payable 67.300 67.300 Arbitrage rebate liabihty 4.079 11.404 15.483 Capitalized lease obhgat~ons 380.997 1.550.945 208.106 1.723.836 Accrued compensated absences 7.661.985 28.468 739.973 6.950.480 Total general long-term debl $ 82.350.650 $ 21.328.117 $ 6.947.489 $ 14.670.394 $ 82.060.884 132 STATISTICAL SECTION STATISTICAL SCHEDULES DIFFER FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BECAUSE THEY USUALLY COVER MORE THAN ONE FISCAL YEAR AND MAY PRESENT NON-ACCOUNTING DATA. THESE SCHEDULES REFLECT SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DATA, AND FINANCIAL TRENDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. ! ! ! ! COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES BY SOURCE (1) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Unaudited) Fsscal L,cenSes and' Inter. charges for Ftnes and Year Ta~es Permtts (:.lovernmental Servtces Forfettures Other Totals 1988 $ 45,463,309 $ 4.227,550 $ 15.100,312 S 4.881.989 $ 2.414,319 $ 2,914,549 $ 75.002028 % 60.6 5.6 20.2 6.5 3.2 39 1989 51,583.977 6.345.697 16,180,693 5,144.630 2,974,283 4.343.535 86 572.815 % 59 6 73 18 7 6.0 34 5 0 1990 57.992,452 6.468,302 19,606.203 5,733,800 3,213,467 6,359.119 99,373,343 % 58 4 6.5 19.7 5.8 3.2 64 1991 66,960,809 4.924,865 19,363,443 6,426,069 3,012,929 7.915,502 108,603.617 % 61 7 4 5 17.8 5.9 28 7.3 1992 74,147,765 5.977.117 19.349.053 7,453.536 3.119.650 7.825.356 117,872.477 o,;. 62 9 5.1 16 4 63 2 7 6.6 1993 75.594.053 5.580.335 23.925.093 7,602.666 3.212.998 7.957.014 123.872.159 % 61 0 4.5 193 6 2 2 6 6.4 1994 78,828.364 6.339.920 24,573,018 10.921,919 2.903,353 7,611.622 131.178 196 % 60 1 4.9 18.7 8.3 2.2 5.8 1995 84,081,182 5,953.988 25.803,749 10.515.405 3.029.529 8,754.572 138,148.425 % 609 4.3 18.7 7.6 2.2 6.3 1996 81,242,733 6,195,006 27,729,698 11,835,016 2,599.487 8,531,631 138,133,574 % 58.8 4,5 20.1 8.6 1.8 6.2 1997 91,122,244 7,412,054 32,781,746 11,996.430 3,436,721 11,882,261 158,631,456 % 57.4 4.7 20.7 7.5 2.2 7 5 (1) Includes General. Speoal Revenue and Debt Service Funds, Operating transfers tn have been excluded from all years. Source: Colher County Comprehenstve Annual F~nanoal Report. 133 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION (I) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS {Unaudited} F~scal General Pubhc Physical Economic Human Culture and Debt Year Government Safely, Environment Transl3ortahon Envtronment Seduces Recreabon Sem~ce Totals 1988 $ 15,535.989 $ 25,343.690 $ 2,091,861 $ 6,241.994 $ 871,063 $ 3,830.007 $ 3,558.453 S 6.708,513 $ 64.281.570 % 24.3 39.4 3 3 9 7 1.4 6.0 55 10 4 1989 18,952,396 33,222.847 2,908,382 6.620.039 1,390~4t7 3.729,961 4,388.423 6.847,078 78.059.643 % 24.3 42 5 3 7 8 5 1 8 4.8 56 8 ~ 1990 22.071.840 39.914,760 4,372 667 6516 518 I 142,970 4.153.303 4,989,014 7,656,25~ 90.817,323 % 24 3 43.9 4 8 ? ~ 1 3 46 5 5 8 4 1991 23.267,074 44.075,886 6.425.346 6.962,967 2.050.678 4,388,987 5.022.210 8.268,385 100.461,533 % 23 2 43.9 64 6 9 20 44 50 8 2 1992 26,009.525 46.173,847 12,298.916 5,972.493 I 269.338 4.934.702 5.662.942 9,642.135 I1 I..C-53 898 % 232 41.3 11.0 5 3 11 4.4 5.1 86 1993 26.564,661 48,062,340 10,299.424 6,800,597 375,767 5.269.998 6,655.960 28.743.210 ~32.771.957 % 20.0 36.2 7.7 5.1 0.3 4.0 5 0 21 7 1994 29,882,425 48.108.704 6,820.768 7.582,423 417,488 5,562,963 7,911,078 10.807.144 117.092.993 % 25.5 41.1 5 8 65 0.3 4.8 6.8 9.2 1995 28.696.575 49,748.170 6.859.981 7,827,462 973.404 5,311.490 9,340,755 7.644.760 116.402.597 % 24 6 42.8 5 9 6 8 0.8 4.6 8 0 6 5 1996 29.176,061 53,574,998 18,063.485 9.352,063 1.672,577 5.549.492 12.243.918 13.646.380 ~43.278.974 % 20,4 37.5 12.6 6.5 1.2 3.9 8 6 9 5 1997 29.027,587 61.972.518 8.770,943 11,295.736 1.488,424 5.383.713 14.448.397 10.007.288 142.394.606 20.5 43.5 6.2 7 9 10 3.8 10.1 70 % (1) Includes General. Special Revenue and Debt Servfce Funds Operabng Iransfers out have been excluded for all years. Source: Colher Counly Comprehensive Annual FmanOal Report. 134 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Unaudited) County Taxes Collected Percent of Total Fiscal Commissioners Tax D~scounts Plus Taxes Collected Plus Levy Cost Year Population Tax Lev~ Collections Allowed D~scounts Discounts to Tax Lev~ Per Person 1988 135,300 $ 44.546 $ 41.053 $ 1.330 S 42,383 95 14% S 329.24 1989 143.700 50,312 46.340 t,521 47,861 95.13% 350 12 1990 152. 100 57,272 52,492 I. 705 54,197 94 63% 376.54 1991 161.600 65,961 60.516 1.9.55 62,471 94.71% 408.18 1992 168.500 69.915 64,040 2,114 66.154 94.62% 414.89 1993 174,664 68,224 62,416 2,119 64.535 94.59% 390.61 1994 186,641 69,983 63.833 2.219 66,052 94.38% 374.96 199.5 186,64 1 71.087 64.772 2,284 67.056 94.33% 380.88 1996 197,400 78.816 71.876 2.525 74.401 94.40% 399.27 1997 202,903 88.547 80,873 2,871 83.744 94.57% 43640 Ad valorem taxes lewed apply only [o Governmental Funds under the control of Counly Commissioners, Property tax lewes, based on assessed values as of January 1. become due and payable on November I of each year. A 4% discount is allowed if the taxes are paid in November. w~th the d~scount declining by 1% each month thereafter. Accordingly. taxes collected will be 100% of the Tax Levy. Taxes become delinquent on April I of each year and tax ceniticated for the full amount of any unpaid taxes and assessments must be sold not later than June 1 of each year. Property taxes receivable and a corresponding reserve for uncollectible property taxes are nol included in the financial statements as there are no delinquenl taxes as of September 30. 1997. Sources: Tax Collector Annual Report and the Collier County Oemographic and Economic Profile. 135 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA ASSESSEO AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY I (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Unaudited) ! Ratio of Total Widow Taxable Asses,~ed To Fiscal Assessed Governmental Disability Assessed Total Estimated Year Value ° and InsMulfonal Homestead and Other Valuation Acfua ValtJe 1988 $ 9,655.234 $ 526.253 $ 685,768 $ 8.387 $ 8,434.826 100% 1989 10.811.216 808.837 740.714 8.601 9.253.064 100% 1990 12,594.100 895.330 795.617 10.389 10.892.764 100% 1991 14.633.015 1.001,237 869.648 12.757 12.749.373 100% 1992 16. 409,800 1,158.919 929. 009 14,096 14. 307,776 100% 1993 16. 740,669 1,191.083 988.629 14,575 14.54 6,382 100% 1994 17,682,048 1,313,051 1.039.154 16,788 15,313,053 100% 1995 18,617,175 1,523,849 1,093.553 17,579 15.982.1 94 100% 1996 19.684,394 1,588,934 1,146,728 18.071 16,930,661 100% 1997 22.552.225 1,720.842 1,280.311 21.996 19.529.076 100% Property is assessed as of January 1, and taxes based on these assessments are levied and become due on the follOWing November 1. Therefore, assessments and levies applicable to a certain tax year are collected in the fiscal year ending during the next succeeding calendar year, 'The basis of assessed value required by the state is 100% of aclual value. Source: Property Appraiser Recapitulation Report. 136 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA PROPERTY TAX RATES · ALL DIRECT A*,ID OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Unaud~led) COLLIER COUNTY OTHER SDeoal Dehl Cal~lal County Fmcal Gef'~*al Revenue Serwce Projects Sclloo~ Independent Year Fund Funds Funds Funds Total D~stnct O~tflcts Total 1988 3 3339 8372 s040 1 (X)O0 52761 7 5400 1.5815 14 3966 1989 3 4977 8098 1076 1 0000 5 4151 78630 1 6302 14 9083 1990 3 3070 7428 1572 I 0000 $ 2070 8 0240 1.7531 t4 9841 1991 33502 6637 1378 1 0000 5 1517 8 2500 1 5718 14 9735 1992 3.3295 7664 .1126 0.6580 4.8665 7.9570 1.4629 14 2864 1993 3.2580 7726 1094 0 5,474 4 6874 8 0000 1 4455 14 1329 1994 3 6729 .7823 .1106 0.0000 4.5858 8.0860 I 5648 14 2166 1995 3 6028 .6834 1062 00000 4.3924 8.3227 1.5028 14 2179 1996 3 4918 7091 .0989 0.0000 4.2998 86000 1 5353 14 4351 1997 3 6838 7604 0452 0 0000 44894 8.4298 1 5941 14 5133 Basis for properly tax rates ~s 1 m~l113~ 51.000 of assessed value Properly ~s assessed as of January 1 and taxes based o~ tttose assessmenls are lev~d according Io the tax rate ~n effect that tax year and become due on November 1. Therefore, assessments and lax le~es a~..able lo a ce~3~n tax year are collected m the fiscal year end~ng dunng the following calendar year S~nce hscal year 1995 the m~llage rates for ca0~tal I:)roject$ are ~ncluded ~n the General Fund millage rate Sources. Cother County annual ado{3ted budget and the Properly Appra,ser Recap~tulal~on Rel3O~. 137 iiiiii i iiiii iii llllmllllll iiii III II ! I I COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BILLINGS AND COLLECTIONS I LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Unaudited) m Current Current Ratio Of Total m Fiscal Assessments Assessments Collections Outstanding Year Due Collected To Amount Due Assessments I 1988 S 273.001 $ 1,393.658 510% S 6,253.693 1989 263,747 1,310.353 497% 5,184,122 I 1990 188,935 986.600 522% 4,221,012 1991 269,102 643.986 239% 3.679.481 m 1992 2.135,998 5.570.154 26 I% 23.837.372 i 1993 2,232,546 2,970,481 133% 21,707.800 1994 1.919.042 3.207.550 167% 18,963.490 i 1995 1,953,081 2,307.329 118% 17,128.145 1996 2.106,154 2,956.564 140% 15,471.790 m 1997 1,864,401 3,964.276 212% 15,474,223 I High percentages of collections are a result of payments made during interest free penod of new assessment projects levied and early payment due Io sale of prope~lies, I Exc/udes Pine Ridge and Naples Producbon Park assessments which the County acts as agent for the bondholders. ! m m m source: Collier County Assessment Recapitulation Repod. m 138 OB COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPUTATION OF LEGAL DEBT MARGIN September 30. 1997 (UNAUDITED) The Constitution of lhe Slate of FlOrida. Florida Statute 200.181 and Collier County set no legal debt I~mit. COMPUTATION OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEBT Seplember 30. 1997 (Unaudiled) Percent Amount Net Debt Applicable to Applicable to Governmental Entity Outstand~n~ (1) Collier Counb/ (2) Collier Coun~ Direct: Collier County General Obligation Bonds $ 6.011.020 100.00% $ 6.011.020 (1) Excludes amounts available in Debt Service Funds for payment of interest and principal. (2) Applicable percentage ~s determined by Ihe rabo of assessed valuabon of properly subiec! Io laxalion ~n the overlapping unit to ttle valuation of properly subject to taxahon ,n Ihe reporting entity. Source: Collier Counly Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. 139 III I I IIIIII ................................. ' ...... ' .................. II I COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RATIO OF NET GENERAL BONDED DEBT TO ASSESSED VALUES AND NET BONDED DEBT PER CAPITA LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Unaudl!ed) Debt Service Ralio of Nel Net Bonded F,scal Assessed Value Gross Bonded Monies Net Bonded Bonded Debt to Debt Per Year Popular,on !In Milhons) Debt Available Debt Assessed Value Capita 1988 135,300 $ 8,435 $ 8.702,000 $ 69.329 $ 8,632,671 0.10% $ 63.80 1989 143,700 9,253 13.260,000 49,529 13,210.471 0.14% 91.93 19cj0 152,100 10,893 70.092 I..5.." ~'" 000 12,451,908 0.11% 81.87 1991 161,600 12.749 11,681,000 120,110 11.560,890 0.09% 71 54 1992 168,500 14,308 10,879,000 96.965 10,782.035 0.08% 63 99 1993 174.664 14.646 10,021,000 47,489 9,973,511 0,07% 57.10 1994 186,641 15,313 9,102,000 66,636 9,035,364 0.06% 48.41 1995 186,641 15,982 8,115,000 105,423 8,009,577 0.05% 42.91 1996 197.400 16,931 7,240,000 100,720 7,139,280 0.04% 36.17 1997 202.903 19,529 6,100.000 88,980 6,011.020 0.03% 29.63 I Sources: Collier County Demographic and Economic Profile Property Appraiser Recapitulation Repor~ I Colher County Comprehensive Annual Financial Repo~l. i 140 COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA RAT~O OF ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENOITURES FOR G£NERAL BONOI:D OEBT TO TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Unaudited) Total Rabo of Total Interesl General Debt Service Fiscal And Fiscal Total Expenditures To General Year Prmopal Charges Debt Service tl ) Expenditures 1988 $ 566,000 $ 580.753 $ 1,146,753 $ 64.281,570 1.78% 1989 442.000 556.912 998,912 78,059.543 1.28% 1990 738.000 926.985 1.664,985 90,817,323 1.83% 1991 841.000 838.439 1.679.439 100.461,533 1.67% 1992 802.000 788,493 1,590.493 111,963,898 1.42% 1993 858,000 737.046 1,595.046 132.771.957 1.20% 1994 919,000 681.009 1,600,009 117,092.993 1.37% 1995 987.000 622.924 1,609.924 116,402.597 1.38% 1996 1,110.000 587.002 1,697.002 143.278.974 1.19% 1997 1.140.000 356,607 1.506.607 142.394,606 1 m05% (1) Includes General. Special Revenue, and Debt Service Funds. Source: Colher County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. 141 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER FUNDS REVENUE BOND COVERAGE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (1) (Unaudited) Net Revenue Debt Service Requirements F~scal Gross Available For Year Revenue (2) Expenses (3) Debt Service Principal Interest Total Coverage (4) 1988 $ 14,534,226 S 5.959,868 $ 8.574.358 S 603,293 $ 3,393.242 S 3.996,535 2 14% 1989 18,394,205 5.528,519 12.865,686 1.318,405 4,759,217 6.077.622 2.12% 1990 22,073.967 8,808.388 13,265,579 1.369,293 5,655.979 7.025,272 1.89% 1991 24,197.284 10,337,664 13.859,620 1.438,293 5,572.337 7,010,630 1.98% 1992 29.161,021 12,026.998 17.134,023 1.434,958 7.237.098 8,672.056 1 97% 1993 32,166.459 13.142.832 19,023.627 2,128.293 7.352.527 9.480.820 2.01% 1994 35.638,564 15.142.535 20.496.029 2.441,659 7.033.492 9,475,151 216% 1995 37.250,837 17.051,916 20,198,921 4,230,737 6.226.952 10,457,689 1.93% 1996 38.691,604 18.135,792 20,555,812 4.095,477 6.767,030 10,862,507 1.89% 1997 43.408.125 19.356,555 24,051,570 3.782,654 6,372,175 10,154.829 2.36% (1) Coverage applies to the County Water and Sewer Distnct. Marco Water and Sewer District and Goodland Water District. As of 1990. coverage also applies to the Pelican Bay Water and Sewer Distnct (2) Operating revenues plus other income exclusive of extraordinary gains. (3) Total expenses excluding depreciation, amortization, extraordinary losses and bond interest of $6.372.175, (4) Net revenue d~vided by total debt service requirements Source: Coil,er County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. 142 6 B ' COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SALARIES AND SURETY BONDS OF PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS Sel~leml~er 30, 1997 (Unaudited) Annual Amount of Name and Tille of Official Salar~ Sureb/Bond Timothy L. Hancock - Chairman. Board of County Commissioner S 46.980 $ 2,000 Barbara B. Berry · V~ce Chairman, Board of County Commissioners 46.980 2,000 Timolhy J. Constantine - Member. Board of County Commissioners 46,980 2.000 John C, Noms · Member. Board of County Commissioners 46,980 2.000 Pamela S. Mac'kJe . Member. Board of County Commissioners 46,980 2,000 Dwight E. Brock - Clerk of the Circuil Court 88.152 5.000 Don Hunler o Sheriff 94.300 10,000 Mary W. Morgan · Supervisor o1' Elect~ons 75,655 5.000 Abe Skinner - Property Appraiser 88.152 10,000 Guy L. Cadton - Tax Collector 88.152 250,000 Robert F. Fernandez - Counly Administrator ° 123.600 Blanket Bond ' Excludes per(luisites. Source: Collier Counly Payroll Department, 143 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEMOGRAPHIC STATISTICS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Unaudited) Per Fiscal Percent Cap~ta School Unemployment Year Population (1) Increase Income (1) Enrollment (2) Rale (3) 1988 135.300 59% $ 24,675 18.999 4.5% 1989 143,700 6.2% 26.628 20.391 4.3% 1990 152.100 5 8% 27.672 21,547 5.3% 1991 161,600 63% 27.412 23,136 6.6% 1992 168,500 4.3% 27,509 24,152 89% 1993 174,664 3.5% 28.574 25,437 8.5% 1994 186.64 1 6.9% N/A 24.364 8.2% 1995 186,641 0.0% N/A 27.634 6.9% 1996 197,400 5.8% 30.201 24.428 6.4% 1997 202,903 2.7% 30.906 32.572 5.9% ,, N/A = Data not currently available I Sources: (1) Flonda StahstiCal Abstract, Umvers~ty of Florida (2) Collier County School Board. based on full t~me ecluivalenl enrollment, revised 1995. (3) Florida Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Stat~sbcs; and Division of Employment. Security, Department of Commerce. State of Florida expressed as a percentage. 144 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA PROPERTY VALUE. CONSTRUCTION AND BANK DEPOSITS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Unaud~led) Construction and Property Values Commerc~al/Industnal Resldenttal (1) F~scal Number of Value In Number of Number of Value Bank Deposits Year Perm~ls {2) {Thousands) (3) Permits (2) Units (2) (In Thousands) 13) (In Thousands) (4) 1988 270 $ 51.897 2,897 6,496 $ 439,540 S 1,505,433 1989 300 77.720 3.024 6.828 488.345 1,672.041 1990 382 51.659 3,046 6.332 422,736 1.910.521 1991 458 89.243 2,361 3.600 241.487 2.086.219 1992 339 77.169 2,870 4.552 369.141 2,067.215 1993 320 51.958 2.254 3.415 303.851 2.097.133 1994 298 62.211 2,684 4,073 397.861 2,707.107 1995 266 47.724 14.191 4.323 475.769 2,870.991 1996 275 60.789 14.555 5.001 529.834 3.112.346 1997 345 87.748 16,718 6.481 608.996 3.463.731 (1) Includes Duplexes, Mobile Homes. Mult,.Fam~ly and S~ngle Family Slructures. (2) Department of Communffy Development. Permtbumt report by type of structure (new struclures only). Number of un,ts of non-res~denbal cons~rucbon ~s nOl available. (3) Value ~s slated at markel value. (4) Flonda Banker's Association. Source' Co/l~er County Department of Commumty Development and the Florida Banker's AsSOC~abo~ 145 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PRINCIPAL TAXPAYERS COUNTY WIDE 1996 TAX ROLL (Unaudited) 1997 Property Percent of Taxes Total Owner/Taxpayer Levied Taxes Levied Spnnt-Florida Incorporated $ 1,554,474 0.53% Florida Power & L~ght Company 1,545,558 0.53% C~fy National Bank of M,am~ 1,325.261 046% HMC BN LTD Partnersr~p 1.000,709 0.35% Collier Development Corporatton 999.058 0.35% W C I Communit,es 893.163 0.31% Coastland Center Joint Venture 571,647 0.20% Marco Island Uhlittes 536.794 0.18% Lee County Electnc Co-Op 468,312 0.16% C. C Naples. Inc. 438.142 0.15% Total $ 9.333,118 _ 3.22% Total Properby Taxes Levied $ 289.411,803 Amounts for taxpayers w~th similar names have not been combined. Source: Property Appramser's taxpayer Imsting ~n order of taxes levied. 146 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICAL DATA September 30. 1997 (Unaudited) O.a[e_~f establ!s~ 1923 Educa~ Eorm of GeyemmenL Constitutional Coun~ Number of Sch~ls: Preseo~ 2,026 square mdes H~gh s~ls 4 Middle Sch~ls 6 Elemen~ S~Is 20 ~g~ V~t~al Te~ni~l 2 Date ~estde~ Number ol administrators 117 Number ol non-instructional 1.638 1985 115,~0 NumDer of lea~ers 2,089 1986 122.~ 1987 127 7~ C~s~cbon ~~ 1988 135 300 Permits issued 19.415 1989 143 700 Esbmat~ ~nstmctior S 728.320.729 ~ ~52 ~00 1991 161 ~ Pohce Protec~on: (2) 1992 168 514 Numar of s~tions 7 1993 174 6~ Numar of empl~s: 19~ 186 ~ 1 Ce~ified law enfor~ment 424 1~5 186 ~ 1 CeAified ~rre~i~ offi~rs 1~ 1 ~ 197 400 Civilian employees 245 1997 202 ~3 Ce~ified Judi~al employees 17 F~re Protecbon: ~ I ) ~~yee~eaen~mc~; Numar of s~tions 2 ~ of September 30, 1997 2.321 Numar of employees 11 Numar of volunteers-approxi~te 10 Numar of registered volers 1~.026 ~ll~e~s Coun~ Inf~afi~: Miles of stree~ 1.560 Number of voters turned ~t for Number of street ligh~ (3) 1,403 last general eleclion 77.216 - 71% Numar of ~affic ligh~ 128 Number of ~un~ mainlined pa~s 42 Numar of libraries 8 Numar of volu~s in libraries 281.5~ Wate~~~ Number of water an~ s~r cust~ers ~.~0 Daily water ~nsumption peak season (gallons) 13,373.0~ Miles of water lines ~0 M~les of sani~ se~m 624 Miles of pdma~ and se~nda~ drainage facilities 146 (1)Excludes Independent Fire Distnc~ (2) Ex~udes City Poli~ and S~te Tr~pers (3) Ex~udes Lighting Distnc~ (4) New St~ctures and Renovations Sours: Colher County De~raphic and E~nom~c Profile, 147 I I IIIIIIIII IIII III IIIIIII III II IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII I I COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA MAJOR INDUSTRIES WITHIN COLLIER COUNTY September 30. 1997 {Unaudited) Indust~ F~rms Employee Count ' Hotels and Olher Lodging 64 4,260 Health Services 419 7.583 Bus~ness Ser'v~ces 510 4,053 Finance, Insurance and Real Estate 817 5,078 Amusemenl and R ecreal~on Services 121 3,582 Serwces - Other 897 2,079 Servfces 2,828 26,635 Eating and Drinking Places 406 7,388 Food Stores 142 4.052 Auto Dealers and Service Stations 123 1.644 Home Furniture and Furnishings 228 1,328 Retail Trade - Other 363 2.341 Apparel and Accessory Stores 194 1.518 General Merchandise Stores 22 2.072 Building Hardware and Garden 67 973 Retail Trade 1.545 21.316 Federal Government 15 561 State Government 37 768 Local Government 22 7.698 Govemmenl 74 9,027 Agriculture, Forestry and Fishenes 387 9.787 Construction 944 8.938 Manufacturing 190 2.526 Transportation, Communication and Pubhc Utilities 229 2.339 Wholesale Trade 440 2.324 Mining 6 61 Other 2,196 25.975 Total 6,643 82.953 · Average number of people employed ~n 1997. Source: Florida Deparlment o! Labor & Employment Security; Bureau of Labor Manet Information 904-488-1048, Call for E5-202. 148 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA SCHEDULE OF INSURANCE IN FORCE SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (Unaudfted) Type of pohcy and Exp~rat~o~ Annual Type o! coverac, le L~m~ts of L~ab~hty Company Date Premium Property (I) 51,000,000 Northfleld 10101/1997 $ 378,000 General L~ab~hty (2) $1,000.000 per Occurrence Northfleld 1010111997 'Included ~n (1) ~ncJud~ng products and COmpleted operat, ons $3.000,000 (all third party coverages ~n th~s section Excess DIC $5,000.000 Crum & Forster 1010111997 S 138.069 $ 5,000.000 North field 10/0111997 ~ncluded $20,000,000 Royal Surplus L~nes 1010111cJ97 ~ncluded Excess L~aOd~ty 51,000.000 X 51,000,000 St Paul Surplus Insurance 10/01/1997 $ 65.000 Excess L~ab~hty S3,000,000 X 2,000.000 Northfleld I0/01/lCJ'97 $ 21,000 (E & O only) Excess Property $278.106,737 X $1,000,000 Crum & Forster 10/01/1997 $ 284,689 Excess Cr~me $500.000 X 500.000 Hartford Insurance Co. 10/01/1997 $ 1.409 Automobile Liability $1.000,000 Northfleld 10/0111997 'Included in (1) Accidental Death and $75,000 Intentional Death Hartford Insurance Co. I0101/1997 $ 9,766 Dismemberment (AD & D) $25,000 In Lfne of Duty Hartford Insurance Co. $ 29,298 $25,000 Fresh Pursuits A~rport L~ab~l~ly 51,000,000 per occurrence Old Republic Insurance 10,'01/1997 $ 9,312 ~nclud~ng Products and Company Completed Operations Aircraft Liability $2,000,000 AAU 03/13/1998 $ 76.920 ~nclud~ng Passenger Boiler & Machinery $25.000,000 per ACCident Her'fiord Steam Boiler 10f0111997 $ 7,570 Pollution L~ab~l~ty $2,000.000/$4.000,000 Reliance Nabonal 1010111997 $ 31.384 Public Officials Various amounts on Continental Vanous Vanous Bonds (3) Designated Officials Excess Workers' Compensatfon $5.000.000 WC L~m~l Safety National 10101/1997 $ 53.769 Excess Group Med,cal Sl .000,000 per ~nsured EBP Life 12/3111997 Vanous Death and Dismemberment 1 x's annual salar~ Metlde 12/31/1997 Various Contingent Law Enforcement Officers Professional L~ability $2.100,000 Florida Sheriff's Self- 09t3011997 $ 25.000 Insurance lund Contingent Medfcal Malpractice $1,000,000 Hull & Company 04118/1997 $ 7.800 Annual premium on Auto Llabihty does not include Sheriff's Department. (1) Includes real. personal, auto physical damage. ~nland manna equipment, extra expense, EDP. watercraft, valuable papers and records, business interruption, rental value, contractors' equipmenl, computer equipment and software, floocl, earthquake and crime. (2) Includes Public Officials Errors & Omissions, Medical Attendants Malpractice. {3) Public Officials L~abihty. Source: Collier County R~sk Management Oepartment. 149 I COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA i BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 307 1997 i TOGETHER WITH i REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS I I ! I I I ' i COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. i BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30~ '1997 I TABLE OF CONTENTS ! REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS .......................................... 1 I FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups .......................................... 2 I Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - All Governmental Fund Types and I Expendable Trust Funds ................................................................................................. 8 Combined Statement of Revenues. Expenditures and Changes in I Fund Balances - Budget and Actual (Budgetary Basis) - All Governmental Fund Types and Expendable Trust Funds .............................................10 Combined Statement of Revenues. Expenses and Changes in I Retained Earnings - All Proprietary Types ........................................................... Fund 13 Combined Statement of Cash Flows - All Proprietary Fund Types .......................................14 I Notes to the Financial Statements ........................................................................................ 16 I MANAGEMENT LETTER .............................................................................................................. 50 ARTHUR ANDERSEN LL? - REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida: We have audited the accompanying general purpose financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Board of County Commissioners (the "Board") as of and for the year ended September 30, 1997, a.s listed in the Table of Contents. These general finandal statements the purpose ate responsibility Of the management of the Board. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose iinancial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards (1994 Revision), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general purpose financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the Board and are not intended to present the financial position of Collier County, and the results of its operations and the cash flows of its proprietary fund types in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In our opinion, the general purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financi~ position of the Board, as of September 30, 1997, and the results of its operations and the cash flow~ of its proprietary fund typ~ for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with ~ment Auditing 5tandm'd~ (1994 Revision), we have also issued our report dated December 19, 1997 on our consideration of the Board's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with laws, regulations, contracts and grants. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, December 19, 1997. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I II ..................... II IIIIII I COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ('tI~ "'.'~1 ' I COMBINED BALANCE SHEET v SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Special Debt Capital Internal General Revenue Sewice Projects Enteqxise Service Fund Funds Funds Funds Funds Funds ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS Assets: I Cash andinvestments $ 12.206,186 $ 33,142,413 $ 9,343,129 $ 49,298,203 $ 39.951,763 $ 11,479,846. Investments wi~ trustee . Receivables: Special assessments 1,852,087 171,559 . Interest 63,525 244,900 167,312 251,628 ~89,848 52,722 Tcade, net 60.660 3,809.553 32,192 · Unbilled - 1,530,397 Notes 237,602 Other 437,202 215,792 . Due from Constitutional Officers 5,522,337 627.053 1,365 31,694 26.723 158 Due from o~er funds 3.082.137 8.473 - 30,000 62 - Due from o~her governments 1,780.447 791,244 12,599 1,017,280 · Advances and deposits 3.500 - 1,050 Inventory 101,411 737,035 95,244 Prepaid costs 2,500 2,740 12,320 · Restricted assets: Cash and investmef~ts 54.566,744 Special assessments receivable: · Cun'ent - 878,122 . Deferred 11,695,504 Acc~ed interest 876,951 · [] Notes receivable - 1,979,119 Due from other' governments 1,043.571 Property, plan! and equipment (net, · where applicable, of accumulated delxeclation) 351,634,030 4,563,392 Other assets 8,611,105 OUter debits: I Amount available in debt sen, ice funds Amount to be provided f~ retirement of general long-term debt TOTAL ASSETSANDOTHERDEBITS $ 22.820.203 $ 35,491.387 $ 11,376,492 $ 51,018,896 $, 478,042,847 $ 16.224,604 I F~uda~ I Fund Types Account Groups Trust General and Agency General Long-Term Total I Funds Fixed Assets Debt {Menx:~andum Only} $ 10.135,458 $ $ $ 165.556.998 6.097,181 6.097.181 2.023.646 51,279 1,521,214 3,g02,405 1.530.397 237.602 214.922 867,916 28.171 6.237.501 - 3,120.672 3.601,570 4.55O 1,007.914 1,941,604 17,560 54 ,,~:~G, 744 878,122 11.695,504 876,951 1,979.119 1.043.571 204,297,365 560.494.787 8.611.105 9,491,004 9,491,004 67.588,026 67.588.026 17.534.925 $ 204.297,365 $ 77.079,030 $ 913.885.749 - I (CONTINUED) I I COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COMBINED BALANCE SHEET ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS (CONTINUED) SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Governmental Fund Types Propdetar~ Fund Tyl:~es Special Debt Capital Internal General Revenue Service Projects Enterprise Service Fund Funds Funds Funds Funds Funds Uabilitles: Vouchers payabieandaccruals $ 2,740.782 $ 1.820.446 $ 38.426 $ 1.768,512 $ 3,~:63.288 $ 516.247 Due to Constitutional Officers 25,608 291.824 949 6.843 8.840 Due to o~her funds 19.089 - 2,707.512 Due to other governments 337,640 1,279.219 5,097 Deferred compensation payable Self-insurance claims payable 5,723,448 Current maturities o~ lease obligations - 29,459 Current maturities of holes payable ' - 215,639 Deferred revenues 3,323 1.931,626 1,847,062 16,987,411 Refundable deposits Retalnage payable 10.970 26.442 1.479,268 . Escrowed impact fees . . Due to ho/ders of special assessment bonds . I Payable from restricted assets: Vouchers payable - 2,809.852 Deferred revenues 227,293 I Current malurities of notes payable 865.030 . Current maturffies of revenue bo~ds 3.376.737 - I Due to o~er govemmants - 205.837 I Aca'ued interest payable 1,968,531 Customer deposits ' - 387,644 Retalnage payable 1.268.427 . Landfill liabilily 4.324,693 . General obligation bonds payable . - I Revenue bonds and ce~l~cates of ! indebtedness payable (net) 94.952.177 Commercial paper loan payable - I Noles payable - - 17.718,506 . ! Adoitrage rebate liabllitl/ . Capitalized lease obligations . 54.704 I Accrued compensated absences 777.769 421.230 TOTAL LIABILITIES S 3,118,323 $ 5.368.646 $ 1.885,488 $ 20.241.237 $ 135.465,778 $ 6.753.928 I I F, Juctar/ Fund T~]:)es Account Groups I Trust General and A~3ency General Load-Term To~I Funds Fixed Assets Debt IMemorandum Onl~f~ ! I $ 145.640 $ $ 67,300 $ 10.760.641 i 54 334.118 394.071 3.120,672 1,621,956 i 6.097.181 6.097,181 5.723.448 29,459 i 215.639 1,007,914 21.777.336 1,152.068 1,152,068 I 1,516.680 461.574 461.574 6.073.447 6,073.447 I 2,809.852 227'.293 · I 865.030 3.376,737 205,837 i 1.958,531 387.644 1,268,427 4.324,693 6,100.000 6.100.000 i 61.475,000 156.427,177 5.660,000 5.660,00~ 68,785 17.787.291 - 15,483 15.483 I 1.480,068 1,534.772 2.212.394 3,411,393 I $ 15.331.949 $ $ 77,079.030 $ 265.244.379 I (CONTINUED) I co.uE, cou. T'~.o^.o OF cou.~' COMM,SS,O.E.S 6 ^~ ~u.o ~'~'~,~s ^.~ ^ccou.~ ~.ou.s Ico.~'~.u~o~ Governmental Fund Types Pro~etar~ Fund Special Debt Capital In[ernal General Revenue Service Projects Enterprise Service Fund Funds Funds Funds Funds Funds EQUITy AND OTHER CREDITS Equily and olher ~edits: Contributed capital $ $ $ $ $ 239,383.291 $ 2,366.829 Inveslment in general fixed assets . Retained earnings: Reserved for: Revenue bond retirement 9.718.230 Renewal and replacement - 400.020 . Unreserved 93,078,528 7.103.847 Fund balances: Reserved f~: Encumbrances 149.361 4.931.778 7.552.025 Inventory 101.411 Prepaid costs 2,500 Debt service 6,243,596 Trust fund purposes . . Unreserved: Designaled for: Impact fees 363.133 Debt se~ce 3.247,408 Future capital pro~ects 23,225,634 . Undestgnaled 19,451.108 24,825.330 . TOTAL EQUITY AND OTHER CREDITS 19.701.880 30.122.741 9.491.004 30.777.659 342.577.069 9.470.676 TOTAL LIABILITIES. EQUITY AND OTHER CREDITS $ 22,820,203 $ 35,491,387 $ 11,376.492 $ 51,018,896 $ 478.042.847 $ 16.224.604 I The notes to the general purpose financial statements are an integral part of this stalement. I I i I II I III Ill IIIIII IIIII III II II ...................... I I II III III I Il= ' ....... I 6 S I lr,:luc~ary Fund Types Accounl Groups I Trust General and Agency General Long-Term Total i Funds Fixed Asse~ Debt {MefTx~andum Only1. I $ $ $ $ 241.747.120 I 204.297.365 204.297.365 g.718.230 I 400.020 100.182.375 ! 12.633.164 I 101.411 2.500 6.243.596 I 2,202,976 2.202.976 i 363.133 3.247.408 23.225.634 44,276,438 2.202.976 204.297.365 648.641,370 I $ $7,534.925 $ 204.297.365 $ 77,079.030 $ 913,885,749 I I 7 Gene~ Fund Funds Funds Taxes $ 65.282.321 S ~.~.M2 I~1 21.693.8~ 4.1~.~ 3.8~.~ F~ ~ ~ 3,321,677 115,~4 I~t i~ 2,~2,0~ 2,1~,~8 7~2 I~ f~ S~ a~ 1.451 .~ 1~.~ ~~ 2,~2,~2 ~5.675 ~l ~t I 0,052, 762 3.~, 1 PuU~ 2. I ~.376 7. T~n~ 11.~5.7~ E~ ~ment ~ I .~ 1.~.9~ Hu~n ~s 4.591.3~ 792.~9 Cu~ a~ ~ 8.619.~7 5.828.8~ Debt ~ 10.~7~8 T~ ex~ums 27.612.7~ ~.~7.9~ (~) ex~,~s 71.851.8M 4.~2.114 (2.~1.014~ ~ ~sfem in. ~sbfut~f ~ 5,~7, I ~ ~s ~ ~ns 3. I~.~ Pa~ls fo m~ ~fls (14.617.~) ~U~ VMs~ ~ 1.2M.9~ 7~.7~ 4.~.773 (18.~1.515~ (3.671.731) .. (3.1~.~ T~lo~fina~ng ~ (u~s) (67.957.~1) _ (I.~2.4~) 4.~.~5 Ex,ss ~ ~n~s a~ ~r d~s a~ ol~ fina~ uses 3.893.9~ 3.019.705 2.313.~I 15,807,915 .... 27,103,0~ 7.177,473 Fu~d ~fa~ Fund~la~at~of~ar S 1g.701.8~ S ~.I~.741 S g491~ T~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ fi~al s~t~fs am an intel ~K of ~is s~t~nt. Pr~ Tt~st To~al ~ $ 7,652~43 $ 791.670 $ ~.~,157 2.772.~7 32.4~.~ I ~2.712 6.183,979 474,~6 3.911 2.8~.7~ 147~7 7,863.~ i 7,7~.~ 7.7~,~ ~.712 3.217.~3 g~.397 21.~ 4,~.~ m 22, 773, 3~ 1.4~.~ 2 172,8 ~ o. i 2,359.967 15.672.915 86~.159 I0,146.~40 8.770.943 I 80,665 11,376.401 1.488.424 31.795 5,415.50~ 63.482 14,51 ~,879 i 26.211.685 26.211.685 10.007.288 26.211,685 3,402.068 103.601,683 I (3,438.3322 (1,946,1262 69.208.508 I 51.657 (10.214) (63,733,541) I 1.550,~45 1,700,000 4,800.000 14.870,000 (14.617.0<X)) I 7,481,977 3.020,500 23,6~,969 (~.923,07e2 (729,45~2 <27.515.773} 7,300.344 2.291,049 (55,774.3722 3.662,012 344.923 13,434.136 27,321,49'~ 1,875.303 79,e2e.so4 {405,e442 (17,3401 1~4,4701 26,g15,647 1.ese,053 7e,ee2,'~24 $ 30,777,e59 S 2,202,97e $ 92.296.260 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF' COUNFY COMMISSIONERS ~ [,~ COkIBINEO STATEMENT OF REVENUES. EXPENOITURES ANO CHANGES IN FUND B,N. ANCES U D BUDGET AND ACTUAL (BUDGETARY BASIS) AI.L GOVERNMENTAL FL/NO ?YP£$ AND EXP£NDA(JLE TRUSt FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 Govemrnemfal Fu~d Types General fund Speoat Reveeue FuedS (Non-C, AAP~ Budget Actual Variance Budc~et Actual V;mance Revenues Taxe~ S 67.553.~ S 65.282.321 $ (2,271.279) $ ~.370.~ S ~.~.M2 S 478.462 L~n~ a~ ~s 151.7~ ~.918 (~.782) 6.0~.~ 7.~5,~ 1.~.I~ Initial ~.313.289 21.693.825 t,~.536 7.378.~5 4.2~.~8 (3,1~.977) ~a~s f~ 4.085.195 4.~5.~ (19.891) 1,~.1~ 1.825,021 4~,921 Fines a~ ~eitures 3.023.~ 3,321.677 ~8.477 57.~ 115.~ 57.~ Inl~e~ ~ ~3,~ 2.~2,023 1.1~.523 I,~9.81Z 2.1~,~ 1.0~.~ Im~ S~ am~ 1.495.~ 1,451.~ (43.41.1) Mi~flan~ 2,874,751 2,g62.~2 87,751 55,~7 ~3.~7 ~.3~ T~ r~ g8.~5.~5 ~.~.570 55g.335 , ~.~7,659 41,7~,7~ 913.07~ Ex~ Cu~t ~ ~! 10.~.~2 ~0.052. Z62 ~7.~ 3.9~.~7 3.1~.318 7~.~9 Pu~ ~f~ 2.~5.851 2.177.376 28.475 9.1~.572 7,103.1~ 2.~.~7 ~1 ~1 1.892.0~ 1.7~.221 161.863 12.147.~ 7.~,7~ 5,1~.318 Tmn~ 12.~.7~ 11.~.7~ ~.~7 E~< ~i~l ~.037 441.~ 122.593 I.~2.~ 1.~.~ 815.~ Hu~ ~ 4.7~.410 4.~ 1.3~ 173.0~ ~. 114.~ ~2.~9 321 Cu~ a~ r~ 9.~.3~ 8.619.~7 ~0.782 8.~9.8~ 5.8~.~ 3.1~.975 T~ ~s ~.~6.773 27.612.7~ 2.0~.~9 4g,~.7~ ~.288.070 13.~.M8 Ex~ ~ r~en~s (u~) ex~nditures 69.2~,462 71.~51,866 2.593,4~ (8,~9,~ 5.472,~ 14.011,7~ ~ r~ ~r~s (u~) ~a~ ~ns~ e * C~s~l ~ 2,515.~ 5,~7.1~ 2.~2.1~ 1~ 105,197 ~b~ ~ansfe~ ~. ~sbtu~l ~ (~,398.4~) (~.~.~25) 197,875 (7,4~,~) (7.~,5~4) (~.~4) P~ ~ ~l ~a~ 1 .~.~5 1.~.~ P~s ~ ~ ~ns~ ~ g67.~ 1.2~,g55 319,g~ 8,3~0.1~ 8.118.659 (~1.470) ~li~lmnsfem~ (18,~3,689~ (18.091,515~ 812.~74 (4,sgs.~g~ .,, (4,~,031) To~lo~r~na~ ~rces (u~s) (71.8~.08g) (67.957.~1~ 3,~2.1M (2.082,695~., (1.~2.~) ~.891 fina~ ~s ~ (~) ex~n- diems ~d o~ fina~ u~s (2.~1.627) 3.893,~5 6.4~.~2 (10,621.7~) 3.489.~ P~ ~s~t (~ ~le 22) (214.579) (214,579~ (288,~3) Fu~ ~ as res~t~ 8.692.433 15.~7,915 7.115.~2 25,~0.314 28.241.101 2.~.7~7 Fu~ate~ $ 6.1~.~ $ 19.70l.~ $ 13.571.074 $ 14.6~.5~ $ 31,7~.~7 $ 17.~2.437 C,o,~mme~ Fu~d Types ~ 8~ ~1 Va~a~ 8~ ~al Va~ $ 2.~8.~ $ 1.~1.~1 $ (57,839) $ 8.~1.~ $ 7.652,243 S (M9.~7) 3.8~.~ 3.827.~ 4.03~.~2 2.772.~7 (1 I~.~ 272.712 128,512 ~9,276 740,272 3~.~ 8~.025 2.827.7~ 1,928,7~ 8.4~,~ 12,6~.076 4,~.076 I,~2.4~ I .~7.~ 24,935 ~,8~ 5~,712 4.~12 8~.338 ~,3~7 125.059 7.42B, 182 7.7~.274 3~.~2 ~.222.~5 27,~53.741 4.431,375 2,055.~3 1,~6.828 I,~.815 ~.312.768 2,4~.~7 2T.873.921 8.2~,970 4,151.~3 2.~,327 ~,085,~3 14,273.~8 19.812.~5 11.0~,881 4.~.7~ 6.7~.1~ 10.679,~3 10.~7,2M 672,015 ~ 10.6~,~3 10.~7,2M 672,0t5 83,724.165 ~.211.M5 57.512.4~ ~3.251.121~ {2,221.0142 1.0~.107 (~.~1,8~2 1,442,0~ 61,~3.8~ 51.657 51,657 (1~.~) (~,228) 81.672 (~.7~) (10.214) 16,~ 3,~5,~ 3.1~,~ (~5,~) ~.0~,~ 1.7~.~ (28.3~.~) 14.870.~ 14,870.~ (14,617.~} (14,61~.~) s.~.~ ~.~.~ (~.~7) ~.~,.,~7 ~.n~,.~7 (~s.o~o) (3,251,~) (3.1~,~ 151,~ ~2,419,~7} (I,923,07e} 4~,271 2.~8.079 2,313.~1 ~05.452 (25.1~.~} 8,742.4~ ~.~.~ I I I 73 783,~2 ~. f 72,~6 17.321 1 ~.~.22 7, z7.4 S 8,~2,~ S 9,491.~ $ 8M,7~ $ I1,0~,~6 $ ~,0~.391 S 14.~8.~5 I (C~TINUED) 11 COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES. EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES 8UOGET AND ACTUAL (BUDGETARY BASIS) ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUNO TYPES AND EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENOED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Fiduciar~ Fund Ti~o~ Total Expendable Trust Funds ~to~-GAAP} (Memorandum Only) Bud~t Actual Variance Bud~ Actual Variance Taxes $ 66~.500 $ 791.6'70 $ 123.170 $ I01.983.000 $ 99.566.157 $ (2.416.843) Licenses and perm,. 20.000 21.0§.~ 1.05.5 6.249.200 7.7'63.617 1.534.417 Inleroovemmentat 35..55~.662 32.538.666 (3.019.996) C,Ir~q~e$ fo~ ~erv~es 5.593.49~ 6,163,0,37 ~69,542 Fglo~ an~ fode~h.a'o~ 321.[~:X} 474.646 153.148 3.401.9(X) 3.911.3~7 509.467 Inleretl moome 38.300 90.237 51.937 3.239.918 7o80~.934 4.567.016 lint:mcr foet 8.435.000 12.635.076 4.200.076 Speoal m~t~ 3,231,200 3,217,563 (13.617) tdiscMlaneou~ 109.300 21,364 (67,93~1 3.668,666 4,441,6~0 573,184 To(at reve~aes 1.157.600 1.396.972 241.372 171.561.041 178.064.287 6.503.246 General go~mrrle~t 359.200 269.065 70.135 17.301.112 14.568.973 2.732.139 Pubgc f. sfaty 100.300 81.100 19.200 41.728.491 11.800.428 29.928.063 ~ em, vonment 20.275.094 12.922.566 7.352.508 Transportabon 140.899 80.665 60.234 46.482.52~ 25.650.009 20.832.516 Economic envVonme~t 2.426.270 1.488.424 937.846 Human serv~:e.s 46.500 31.79.5 14.70.5 5.92~.268 5.415.508 509.760 Cuttum an~ mc~eabo~ 82.000 63.482 18.$16 29.326.035 16.612.638 10.513.397 De~ ~ 10.701.103 10.007.286 693.815 Tofat exl:)e~:Mu res 728.899 546.107 182.792 174.165.898 100.665.654 73.500.044 (unc~') ex~eflcht~ms 4~8,?0~ 65~.665 4~4.164 12,604.8~7~ 77,398,433 80.003.290 ~ ~ sou~m (uses). (~bng blnsfers ~n. Consbtubonal C)ffic~$ 2.515.100 5.204.038 2.688.938 ODerat~g transfer~ o~ - Co~qshtut~nal Off'~ (5.5.850) (.55.650) (54.030.450) (63.733.541) 165.609 Prix:ce, ds from capitat leases 1.550.945 1.550.945 Proceeds bom loans 33 459,300 4,800.000 {28,659,300) P~ce~$ from refunding bo~ds 14,670,000 14,870,000 Palm~ent$ to refund ~oans (14,617,000) (14,617,000) Operabng transfers ~ 22,318,116 21.228,364 (1,089,7,52) C)pe~'at~'~g tranato~s ou! {6~8,032~ 1.564.912) 23,120 {29,738,037) (27,973.53,4} 1,784,503 Total othe~ I~nancing sources (uses) (643,M21 (564~9121 23,120 ,, (33,692,0;26,) (56,670,728) , (2~,090,002} Excess 04' re,,,eea, es and other I'ea~:~g souses over (under) expen- ditures and ob~e~ financing uses (214.981) 267,953 4,47,284 (30,290,883) 18,727,705 54,9~.935 Fund balances at beginning o/year 9,59,719 1.410.973 451,264 77,479,633 70,930,5,54 (6,649,079) Pf~o4'-pefiod ao~usb~'mflt (fee Note 22) (10.843) (10,8431 ([961,944) 1198'.~44} Fund balances as restated 959,719 1,400,130 440,411 77.479.633 69,948.610 (7.531.0231 Fund bafances at (md of year S 744,738 $ 1.666,083 S 867.695 $ 41,162,750 S 88.676.315 S 47.437.915 Tho notes to t~e generad ~ I~'~x~l slatements are an integral Dar1 of U'.s statement. 12 I Proprietary Fund Types i Internal Total Enterprise Funds Service Funds (Memorandum Operating revenues: I Charges for services $ 55.233.932 $ 15,832.272 $ 71.066.204 Total operating revenues 55,233,932 15,832.272 7 ~,066.204 I Operating expenses: Personal services 13.427,356 5,201.369 18.628.725 Operating 27,050,863 12,628.043 39,678,906 Depreciation 8,824,298 1.264.829 10,089.127 I Amortization 344.150 344.150 Tolal operating expenses 49.646.667 19,094.241 68,740.908 I OperaUng income (loss) 5,587,265 (3,261,969~ 2.325.296 I Non-of:)erating revenues (expenses): Interest income 6.378,106 699,603 7.077.709 Interest expense (6.797,896) (6.797.896) Miscellaneous income 51.126 1.648.050 1.699.176 I Gain (loss) on disposal of I~xed assets (142,675) 127.405 (15,270) Loss on discontinued projects (148.426) (148.426) Grants and enbtiemonts 453,741 453,741 I Total non-o~erating revenues (expenses) {206,0241 2.475.058 2,269.034 Income (loss) before operating transfers 5.381,241 1786,9111 4.594,330 I Operating Iransfem: Operating transfers In - Constitutional Officers 4.066 4.066 I Operating transfers out - Constitutional Officer (65.437) (65,437) Operating Iransfers in 4,366,830 26.600 4,393.430 Operating transfers oul (156,4161 {388.2001 (544.616) I Total operating [ransfers 4,149,043 (361,6001 3,787,443 Nel Income (loss) 9,530.284 (1.148.5! 1) 8.381.773 I Deprecialion of contributed assets 4.843,646 507.783 5.351.629 Increase in retained earnings 14,374.130 (640.728) 13,733,402 I Retained earnings at beginning of year 89,476.418 7,836.726 97,313,142 Prior.period adjustment (see Note 22) (653,768) (92.1511 (745.919} I Retained earnings as restated 88.822,648 7.744.575 96.567,223 Retained earnings at end of year $ 103.196.778 $ 7.103,847 $ 110,300,625 IThe notes to Ihe general purpose financial statements are an integral part of Ibis statement. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 proprietary Fund Types Internal Total ,Enterprise Funds Service Funds IMemorandum Onh/) Cash flows from operating activities: Cash received for services $ 52.681.851 $ 15.934,953 $ 68.616.804 Cash received from customer deposits 13.506 - 13.506 Cash payments on behalf of other govemrnents (14.313) (14.313) Cash payments for goods and services (25.488.023) (11.729.817) (37.217.840) Cash payments Io employees (13.647,3791 (5,315.9801 I18.963,359) Net cash provided by (used for) of~erating activities 13,545,642 I1,110.844) 12.434,798 Cash I~ow~ from no,capital financing activities: Cash o~erating grants received 494,606 494,606 cash transfer~ from other funds 26,634.921 26.600 26.661.521 Cash transfers to other funds (22,485.878) (388.200) (22,874,078) Proceeds from insurance refunds.~retmbursements 1,648,050 1.648,050 Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities 4,643.649 1,286,450 5.930.099 Cash flows from capital and related financing acttviUes: Cash contributions received 14.365.669 14.365.669 Receipts from capital grants 1.613.687 1.613.687 Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets 85.561 163,446 249.007 Proceeds from sale of scrap 42.843 - 42.843 Proceeds from rental of land 8.283 - 8.283 Proceeds from loans 5.184.123 5.164.123 Payments for capital acquisitions (16.675.802) (1.171.684) (17.847,486) Principal payments on bonds (3,056,234) (3,056.234) Pflncipal payments on notes (1.952.997) (1,952.997) Pdndpal payments on capilal Peases (27,871) (27,871) Interest and fiscal agent fees paid (6.478.7941 16.478.794~) Nel cash used for capital and related financing activities (6.863,661~ (1,036,109~ (7,899,770~ Cash flows from investing activities: Interest and dividends on investments 6,264,150 681,533 6,965.683 Net cash provided by investing activities 6,264.150 681.533 6,965.683 Net increase (decrease) in cash 17.609,780 (178.g70) 17.430.810 Cash. October 1, 1996 (inciudlng ,$39.716.004 in restricted cash) 77,567.195 11.750,967 89.313,462 Prior-period adjustment (see Note 22) (653,768) (92.151~1 1745.91g~ Cash. October 1. 1996 (including $39,716,004 in restricted cash) 76.908.727 11.658.816 68.567.543 Cash, September 30. 1997 (including $54.566,744 in restricted cash) $ 94,518,507 $ 11,479,846 $ 105,998.353 The notes lo ~e general purpose financial statements are an integral part of Ihis statemenL (CONTINUED) 14 COLUER COU.T¥ eO D cou rn. COMM SS O.ERS COMe,.ED S '^TE E r OF C^SH LOWS THE ,SC^L E.DED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 Proprtetar~ Fund Types Internal Total Enterprise Funds Service Funds (Memorandum Only} Cash flows from operating activities: Cash received f(x sewices $ 52.681.851 $ 15.934,953 $ 68,616,804 Cash received from cust~3mer deposits 13,506 13.506 Cash payments on behalf of other governments ( 14.313) (14.313) Cash payments fo~ goods and sen/ices (25,488,023) (11.729.817) (37,217,840) Cash payments to employees 113.647,379t [5.315,980) (18.g63.359~) Net cash provided by (used fo~) operating activities 13.545,642 , , 11,110,844) 12,434,798 Cash flov~ from noncapital financing activiUes: Cash operaUng grants received 494,606 494,606 Cash t~ansters from other funds 26,634.921 26.600 26.661,521 Cash transfers to olher funds (22,485,878) (388,200) (22.874,078) Proceeds from insurance refunds/reimbursements 1,648.050 1,648,050 Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities 4.643,649 1.286,450 5.930.099 Cash flows from capital and related financing actium: Cash con~butions received 14.365.669 14.365,669 Receipts from capital grants 1.613,687 1.613,687 Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets 85,561 163.446 249.007 Proceeds from sale of scrap 42,843 42.643 Proceeds from rental of land 8.283 8.283 Proceeds from loans 5,184.123 - 5.184,123 Payments fo~ capital acquisitions (16,675.802) (1.171,684) (17,847,486) Principal payments on bonds (3,056,234) (3,056.234) Principal payments on notes (1.952,997) (1,952,997) Pflncipal payments on capital leases (27.871) (27,871) Interest and fiscal agent fees paid {6,478,794) (6,478,794) Net cash used fo~ capital and related finandng activities 16.863,6611 {1,036,1091 {7,899.7701 Cash flows from investing activities: Interest and dividends on investments 6.284.150 681,533 6.965.683 Net cash provided by investing activities 6,284,150 681.533 6,g65.683 Net increase (decrease) in cash 17.609.780 (178.970) 17.430,810 Cash. October 1. 1996 (including $39.718.004 In restricted cash) 77.562.495 11.750.967 89.313,462 Prior.perfod adjustment (see Note 22) (653,758) (92.151) {745.9191 Cash. October 1, 1996 (including $39.716.004 in restricted cash) 76,908.727 11.658.816 88.567.543 Cash. Sep{ember 30. 1997 (including S54.566,744 tn restricted cash) $ 94.518.507 $ 11.479,646 $ 105. g98.353 The notes to Ihe general purpose financial statements are an integral part of this statement. (CONTINUED) 14 Il [- - n .... ,,,,,ma ....... I ............................... I .......................... I Illlrfl'rl I I 6 B I COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES (CONTINUEO) i FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1997' RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) TO i NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTMTIES I Propdetar~ Fund T)~es Internal Total Ente~rise Funds Service Funds IMemo~-andum Only) I Operating income (loss) $ 5.587.265 $ (3.261.969.),, $ 2.325.296 i Adjustments Io reconcile operaUng Income (loss) Io net cash i:~r.~led by opereMng acMvltie$: Delxedat~on expense 8.824.298 1.264.829 10.089.127 Amod~zaMon of capital Improvement projects 325.619 325.619 I AmortizaMon of bond issuance co, ts 7.894 7.894 (Increase) in accounts receivable (1.277.634) (5.359) (1.282.993) (Increase) decrease in due from other funds (2.318) 106.429 104.111 (Increase) in advances and deposits (40) (40) I Decrease in inventory 9.506 24.348 33.854 Increase in vouchers payable 350.628 215.424 566.052 (Decrease) in due lo other funds (203) (203) (Decrease) in aco'ued wages (175.026) (74.022) (249.048) I (Decrease) in accrued compensated absences (44.997) (26.856) (71.853) (Deo'eass) in due to other governments (73.099) (13.733) (86.832) Increase in customer deposits payable 13.506 13.506 Increase in self-insurance claims payable 660.308 660.308 I Total adjustments 7.958.377 2.151.125 10.109.502 I Nel cash p.'ovided by (used for) operating activities $ 13.545.642 $ [1.110.8441 $ 12.434.798 I Non-cash investing, capital, and financing activities: There were non-cash developer contributions of $6.673.046 in the County Water and Sewer OisMct Fund. I There were non-cash contributions from pdvate organizations of $300.000 in the Airp(xl Authority Fund. I The Solid Waste Disposal Fund received contributions of assets from vadous funds with a depreciated value of $210.809. The odginal cost of these assets was $211.394 with $585 in accumulated depredation. The Departmenl of Revenue Fund received contributions of assets from various funds with a depreciated value of $135.516. I The original cost of these assets was $334.672 with $199.156 in accumulated depredation. I 15 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 INDEX NOTE PAGE NUMBER 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Pohcies 17 2 Cash and Investments 25 3 Trade Receivables 4 Interfund Receivables (Due From) and Payables (Due To) 28 5 Fixed Assets 29 6 Long-Term Debt 30 7 Revenue Bonds Administered by the State of Florida 37 8 Conduit Debt Obligations 37 9 Defeased Debt 38 10 Budget to Actual 38 11 Contributed Capital 40 12 Deferred Compensation Plan 41 13 Pension Plan Obligations 41 14 Segment Information Enterprise Funds 42 15 Operating Transfers 44 16 Fund Equity 45 17 Risk Management 46 18 Landfill Liability 47 19 Deficit Retained Earnings 48 20 Significant Contingencies 48 21 Significant Commitments 48 22 Prior-Period Adjustment 49 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES THE REPORTING ENTITY The primary government consists of The Collier County Board of County Commissioners ("Board"). The Board consists of five members elected within single member districts. There are five Constitutional Officers; the Tax Collector, Property Appraiser, Sheriff. Clerk of the Circuit Court and Supervisor of Elections. The Constitutional Officers are elected county wide. The Board of County Commissioners budgets and provides all funding used by the separate Constitutional Officers with the exception of fees collected by the Clerk of the Circuil Court and the Tax Collector. Under the direclion of Ihe Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Collier County Finance Department maintains the accounting system for the operations of the Board of County Commissioners and the Supervisor of Elections. The Tax Collector, Property Appraiser, SheriCf and Clerk of the Circuit Court each maintain their own accounling syslems. These statements reflect the financial position and results of operations by the ~.~ard only and do not reflect the activities of the five Constilufional Officers. The Board's blended component units consist of organizations whose respective governing Boards are composed entirely of the Board of County Commissioners serving ex-officio, except for Ihe Collier County .Nrport Authority whose governing Board is appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. These entities are legally separate, however financial support has been pledged and financial or operational policies may be significantly influenced by the Board. In accordance with General Accounting Standards Board ("GASB") Statement 14, "The Financial Reporting Entity", these organizations are reported as rf they were part of the Board's operations. The financial position and results of operations of the following blended component units are accounted for in enterprise funds and can be found in the proprietary section of this report: Collier County Water and Sewer District The District was established by Chapter 88-499, Laws of Florida, to provide water, sewer and effluent services to certain portions of the unincorporated area of Collier County. The District currently operates three wastewater treatment facilities and two water treatment plants. Marco Island Water and Sewer District The District was established by Collier County Ordinance 77-58 under authority granted by Chapter 153, Part II1, Florida Statutes. The District provides sewer services to customers on a portion of Marco Island. Goodland Water District The District was established by a Special Referendum Election authorized by Collier County Ordinance 75-5 and Section 125.01(q) of Florida Statutes. The District provides potable water service to the residents of Goodland. Collier County Airport Authority The Authority was established by Collier County Ordinance 95-67 and Sections 332.001 through 332.120, Florida Statutes. The Authority provides Collier County with the services of three airports: The Immokalee Regional Airport, the Marco Island Executive Airport and the Everglades City Airpark. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED THE REPORTING ENTITY - CONTINUED Complete financial information on the individual component units can be obtained from their respective administrative offices or from the Finance Department of the Clerk of Circuit Court. Administrative Offmes: Collier County Water and Sewer District 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Marco Island Water and Sewer District 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Goodland Water Distdct 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accounts of the Board are organized on the basis of funds and account groups. Each fund is considered a separate accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts. Fund structures, where applicable, have been designed to comply with all requirements of relevant bond resolutions. Account groups are a reporting device to account for certain assets and liabilities of the governmental funds not recorded directly in those funds. The following fund types and accounl groups are used by the Board: GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS General fund - the general fund is the general operating fund of the Board. All general tax revenues and other receipts that are not accounted for in other funds, are accounted for in the general fund. Special revenue funds - special revenue funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted by legal requirements, regulatory provisions or administrative action. Debt sen/ica funds - debt sen/ica funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of principal, interest and other expenditures on long-term debt, other than bends and notes payable from the operation of proprietary funds. Capital projects funds - capital projects funds are used to 3ccount for financial resources segregated for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by proprietary funds. 18 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED BASIS OF PRESENTATION - CONTINUED PROPRIETARY FUNDS Enterprise funds - enterprise funds are used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to pdvate business enterprises. The intent is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods or services to general public on a continuing the basis be financed primarily through user charges, or where pedodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, and/or net income is deemed appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability or other purposes. Internal service funds - internal service funds are used to account for the financing of goods or servics~ provided by one departmenl to other departments of the Board or to other governmental units on a cost reimbursement basis. FIDUCIARY FUNDS trust funds - expendable trust funds are used to accoun! for assets held by the Board in a trustee Expendable capacity or where legally mandated. AJI of the principal and income may be expended in the course of their designated operations. Agency funds - agency funds are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not involve measurement of results of operations. Agency funds are clearing accounts for assets held by a government as an agent, for individuals, private organizations and other governments or other funds. ACCOUNT GROUPS General fixed assets account group - this account group is used to account for properly, plant and equipment not used in proprietary fund type operations. The general ~ixed assets account group does not include public domain, infrastructure, fixed assets such as roads, bridges, curbs and gutters, streets and sidewalks, drainage systems, lighling systems and similar assets that are immovable and of value only to the Board. General long-term debt account group - this accounl group is established to account for long-term debt and other liabilities not accounted for in proprietary funds. BASIS OF ACCOUNTING AND MEASUREMENT FOCUS Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures or expenses are recognized in the accounts and repoded in the financial statements. Basis of accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made regardless of the measurement focus applied. The modified accrual basis of accounting is used in the gove¢;~mental, expendable trust and agency ftJnd types. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become both measurable and available !o finance expenditures of the current period. Available means collectible within the current period or soon enough generally days, pay thereafter, 60 to be used to liabilities of the current pedod. Primary revenues including special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services, rents and interest are treated as susceptible to accrual under the modified accrual basis. Property taxes are discussed later in this footnote. Other revenue sources are not considered measurable and available and are not treated as susceptible to accrual. Expenditures are recorded when the related fund liability is incurred. Exceptions to this general rule include accrued compensated absences and principal and interest on general long-term debt. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. t997 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED BASIS OF ACOOUNTING AND MEASUREMENT FOCUS - CONTINUED In applying the susceptibility-to-accrual concept 1o intergovernmental revenues, the legal and contractual requirements of the numerous individual programs are used as guidance. There are essentially two types of these revenues. In one, monies must be expended on the specific purpose or project before any amount will be paid lo the Board; therefore, revenues are recognized based upon the expenditures recorded. In the other, monies are virtually unrestricted as to purpose of expenditure and revocable only for failure to comply with prescribed compliance requirements, such as with equal employment opportunity. These resources are reflected as revenues at the time of receipt, or earlier if they meet the availability criterion. Proprieta~/funds use the accnJal basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized in the period in which they are earned and expenses are recognized in the period when incurred. The measurement focus applied to governmental fund types and to expendable trust fund types is the flow of current financial resources. Only current assets and current liabilities are generally included on the balance sheel. Fund balance is considered a measure of available, spendable or appropriable resources. The measurement focus applied to proprietary fund types is the capital maintenance or flow of economic resources measurement focus. Ail assets and all liabilities (current or noncurrent) are included on the balance sheet. Fund equity is segregated into contributed capital and retained earnings. BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY DATA The following are the statutory procedures followed by the Board of County Commissioners in establishing the budgets for the Board: 1) Within fifteen days after certification of the ad valorem tax roll by the Property Appraiser, the County Budget Officer prepares and presents to the Board a tentative budget for Ihe ensuing fiscal year. The budget includes all estimated receipts, balances to be brought forward, and all estimaled expenditures, reserves and balances to be carried forward at the end of the year as specified in Section 129.03, Florida Statutes. 2) Within eighty days of the certificalion of value, but not earlier than sixty-five days after certifk'..alion, the Board holds a public hearing on the tentative budget and proposed millage rate, At this hearing the Board amends and adopts the tentative budget, recomputes the proposed millage rate, and announces publicly the percentage, if any, by which the recomputed proposed millage rale exceeds the rolled-back rate. If the millage rate tenlalively adopted exceeds that proposed, each taxpayer within the jurisdiction is notified of the increase by first class mail, at the expense of the Board. 3) Within fifteen days of the meeting adopting the tentative budget, the Board advertises the County's intent to adopt a final budget and millage rate. 4) A public hearing is held by the Board to finalize the budget and adopt a millage rate, This headng is held not less than two days and not more than five days after the day that the advertisement is first published. Prior to September 30, the millage levy is adopted by a separate vote. In no event is the millage rate adopted allowed to exceed the tentatively adopted millage rate. This is followed by the approval and ratification of the final budget. IIII II I I ! III I II1! II ............... '"'"' "1 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED I BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY DATA - CONTINUED I 5) The resolution approved at the final hearing is forwarded to the Property Appraiser, Tax Collector, and Florida Department of Revenue; and not later than thirty days following the adoption of the Resolution, the Board certifies to the State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Division of Ad Valorem Tax that it has I complied with the provisions of Chapter 200, Florida Statutes. 6) The County Administrator approves intradepartmental budget changes that do not alter the total Iexpenditures of the departmenl. All other budgetary changes must be approved by the Board ~¢ County Commissioners as a matter of policy. The initial adopled budget was amended during the fisc~;I year in accordance with Ihe Florida Statutes. I 7) Budgets are monitored al varying levels of classificalion. However, expenditures cannot legally exceed total appropriations at the individual fund level. Section 129.07, Florida Statutes, as amended in 1978, i provides thai expenditures in excess of total fund budgets are unlawful. Formal budgetary inlegration is employed as a management control device during the fiscal year for all fund lypes. Budgets have been legally adopted by the Board for all Board funds except for agency funds and those I funds described in Note 10, "Budget to Actual". The Property Appraiser and the Tax Collector adopt budgets for their general funds independently of the Board. The Clerk of the Circuit Court (to the extent of his function as ex- officio Clerk to the Board and the amounts of his fee structure as Clerk to the Circuit and County Courts), Sheriff, and Supervisor of Elections prepare budgets for their general funds which are submitted to and approved by the I Board. Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepled accounting principles ('GAAP") for all I governmental funds except as described in Nole 10, "Budget to Actual". All unencumbered appropriations lapse at the end of the current year. Capital project costs are budgeted in the year they are anticipated to be obligated. In subsequent years, the unused budget is reappropriated until the project is completed. I Proprietary funds are budgeted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, except that capital related and debt lransactions are based upon cash receipts and disbursements. Estimated beginning fund balances are considered in the budgetary process. Differences between estimated beginning fund balances and actual fund balances, if material, are submitted to the Board as budget amendments. I ENCUMBRANCES IEncumbrance accounting is utilized in the governmental funds as an extension of the budget process whereby purchase orders, contracts to be executed and other commitments are recorded as reservations of fund balance. I! is lhe Board's intention 1o honor these encumbrances under authority provided in the subsequent Iyear's budget. Fund balance is reserved to indicate this commitment. ! ! 6 B COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENTS The Board maintains a cash and investment pool which is available lo all funds. Interest earned is allocated based on the individual fund's average daily balance in the cash pool. Pursuanl lo the provisions of GASB Statement 31, "Accounting and Financi&i Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools', all investments are stated at fair value (see Prior-Period Adjustment Note 22). Cash equivalents are defined as short-term highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date purchased. Additionally, Ihe individual fund's equity in the cash and investment pool is considered to be a cash equiValent. INVENTORIES AND PREPAID COSTS Inventory is valued at cost which approximates market value, using the first-in, first-out method. Inventory in the governmental funds consisls of expendable supplies held for consumption, The cosl is recorded as an expenditure at the time individual inventory items are consumed. Reported inventories and prepaid costs are equally offset by a fund balance reserve which indicates that they do not constitute available spendable resources. Invenlodes and prepaid costs of proprietary funds are reported as an expense when consumed. GENERAL FIXED ASSETS General fixed assets are recorded as expenditures in the general fund, capital projects funds and other govemmenlal fund types at the time of purchase, and capitalized at cost in the general fixed assets account group. Public domain, or infrastructure fixed assets consisting of certain improvements including roads, bddges, curbs and gutters, streets and sidewalks, drainage systems and lighting systems have not been capitalized. Gifts or contributions are recorded in the general fixed assets account group at fair market value at the time received. There is no depreciation expense recorded on general fixed assets. The Board maintains a policy to capitalize fixed assets which cost $500 or more and have a useful life in excess of one year. FIXED ASSETS OF PROPRIETARY FUNDS Land, buildings, improvements and equipment are stated at cost. Contributions of property are recorded at their fair market value on the date donaled. Facilities constructed using system development impact fees, collected from developers and customers, are stated at cost. The Board capitalizes major expenditures for additions and improvements. Major expenditures include items with a cost of $500 or more and with a useful life in excess of one year. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operating expenses. The cost of assets retired or sold, together with the related accumulated depreciation, is removed from the accounts and any gain or loss on disposition is credited or charged to earnings. 22 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD O~= COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED FIXED ASSETS OF PROPRIETARY FUNDS - CONTINUED Depreciation on fixed assets acquired through contributions is recorded as an expense and transferred from retained earnings as a reduction of contributed equity on the balance sheet. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method. The estimated useful life of the various classes of depreciable fixed assets is as follows: Estimated Fixed Asset Useful Life Buildings 20-40 years Improvements other than buildings 2-40 years Equipment 4-10 years CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS Capital lease obligations and the related assets of governmental fund types are accounted for in lhe general long-term debt account group and in the general fixed assets account group, respectively. Caprtal lease obligations of proprietary fund types and the related cost of assets acquired are reflected in the balance sheet accounts of those funds. For capital lease obligations originating in governmental funds, an expenditure for the asset and the offsetting amount of the financing source is reflected in the statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances. FUND EQUITY Contributed capital is recorded in proprietary funds that have received capital grants or contributions from developers, customers or other funds. Resen/ed retained earnings and fund balance represents those portions of fund equity not appropriable for expenses/expenditures or those portions legally restricted for a specific future use. Designations of fund balance represent tentative plans for expenditures. BOND DISCOUNTS AND BOND ISSUANCE COSTS In governmental funds, bond discounts and issuance costs are recognized in the current period. Bond discounts and issuance costs for proprietary funds are deferred and amortized over the term of the bonds using the interest method and lhe straight-line method, respectively. Bond discounts are presented as a reduction of the face amount of bonds payable while issuance costs are recorded as deferred charges. DEFEASANCE OF DEBT REPORTED BY PROPRIETARY FUNDS GASB Statement 23, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Refundings of Debt Reported by Proprietary Activities", is applicable to the proprietary funds. For refundings resulting in the defeasance of debt reported by proprietary activities, this statement requires that the difference belween the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the old debt be deferred and amortized as a component of interest expense. The straight- line method is used for amortization of the deferred charge. 2:3 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED INTEREST COST Interest cost is charged Io expense or expenditure as incurred, except for interest capitalized in the Proprietary Funds. in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") Statement 34. "Capitalization of Interest Cost". and FASB Statement 62, 'Capitalization of Interest Cost in Situations Involving Certain Tax-Exempt Borrowings. and Certain Gifts and Grants." when applicable. PROPERTY TAXES Property taxes become due and payable on November 1st of each year and become delinquent on A~il 1st of the following year. Discounts on properly taxes are allowed for payments made prior to the April 1st ~elinquent date as follows: November - 4%, December - 3%. January - 2%. and February - 1%. Tax certif'mates for the full amount of any unpaid taxes must be sold not later than June 1st of each year. No accrual for the property tax levy becoming due in November 1997 is included in the accompanying financial statements, since such taxes are collected Io ~inance expenditures of the subsequent period. Property taxes receivable and a corTesponding allowance for uncollectible property taxes are not included in the financial statements, as there are no delinquent taxes as of September 30, 1997. Key dates in the property tax cycle for the fiscal year ended Seplember 30. 1997 are as follows: Property Tax Cycle Date Assessment roll compiled January 1. 1996 Assessment roll certif'~=~d July 1. 1996 Millage resolution approved No later than 95 days following certification Beginning of fiscal year for tax levy October 1. 1996 Taxes due and payable (levy date) November 1, 1996 Property taxes payable: Maximum discount (4%) 30 days after levy date Due date March 31. 1997 Delinquent (lien dale) April 1, 1997 Tax certi~icales sold Prior to June 1. 1997 ACCRUED COMPENSATED ABSENCES The Board follows the provisions of GASB Statement 16, "Accounting for Compensated Absences". This statement provides for the measurement of accrued vacation leave and other compensated absences using the pay ~ salary rates in effecl at the balance sheet date. It also requires additional amounts to be accnJed fo~ certain salary related payments associated with the payment of compensated absences. 6 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS m NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 1 -'SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED m ACCRUED COMPENSATED ABSENCES - CONTINUED m it is the Board's policy to allow employees to accumulate an unlimited number of hours unused of sick leave and up to 240 hours of unused vacation leave. Effective March 1, 1996 the Board modified the policy for sick leave pay upon termination. Employees of record August 2. 1996 may be granted a sick leave payment upon m ten'nination for any service period earned pdor to August 2, 1996. No employee hired after August 2, 1996 shall receive payment for accrued sick leave upon termination. Upon termination employees are granted 100% of allowable vacation hours at the current rate of pay. Accrued compensated absences flowing through governmental fund types are rocorded in the general long-term debt account group because it does not require I the use of available spendable resources at the balance sheet date, For proprietary funds, the liability re~ated to vested sick and vacation leave is recorded on the balance sheet as a long-term liability. APPLICATION OF FASB PRONOUNCEMENTS TO PROPRIETARY FUNDS m in accordance wilh GASB Stalemenl 20, 'Accounting and Financial Reporting for Proprietary Funds and Other Governmental Entities That Use Proprietary Fund Accounting", the Board has elected not lo apply those FASB mStatements and Interpretations issued after November 30, 1989. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES m The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the repoded amounts of revenue and expenses during the repoded pedod. m Actual results may differ fi.om those estimated. TOTAL COLUMNS ON THE COMBINED STATEMENTS - OVERVIEW Total columns on the Combined Statements - Overview (General Purpose Financial Statements) are captioned "Memorandum Only" to indicate that they are presented only to facilitate financial analysis. Data in these columns does not present financial position, results of operations or cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, and such data is not comparable to a consolidation. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. NOTE 2 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS The Board maintains a cash and investment pool that is available for use by all funds. Each fund type's portion of this pool is displayed on the combined balance sheet under the heading of Cash and Investments. Inveslment income is allocated monthly to participating funds based on the percentage of each fund's average daily balance in the total pool. In addition, certain investments are separately held by trustees in accordance with bond indentures and other contractual agreements. DEPOSITS All cash deposits are held in qualified public depositories pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 280, 'Florida Secudty for Public Deposits Act". Under the Act, all qualified public depositories are required to pledge eligible collateral having a market value equal to or greater than the average daily or monthly balance of all public deposits, multiplied by the depository's collateral pledging level. The pledging level may range fTom 50 to 125% depending upon the depositor's financial condition. Any losses to public deposits are covered by applicable deposit insurance, sale of securities pledged as collateral, and if necessary, assessments against other qua:ified public depositories of the same type as the depository in default. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 2 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS - CONTINUED DEPOSITS - CONTINUED At September 30, 1997 the Board had demand deposits of $6,922,193. These deposits were fully covered by federal depository insurance or by collaleral, in the Board's name as required by Sections 280.07 and 280.08 of Ihe Florida Statutes. INVESTMENTS The Board's investment practices are governed by Florida Statutes 125.31 and the Board's investment policy which was adopled by County Ordinance 87-65. The Board is authorized Io invest in obligations of the U.S. Treasury, its agencies and instrumentalities, commercial paper, bankers' acceptances, repurchase agreements, ceraficates of deposits, and the Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund. As with any investment, the securities held by the Board are sensitive lo different elements of risk. The major risks are market, legal risk and credit risk. Market risk relates to the risk that the market value of an investment will decline during the life of the investment. The level of market risk is delen'nined by such factors as: the length of lime before the investment matures and the likelihood of an investment being sold before its maturity in order to meet operational requirements. The Board continues lo hold various U.S. government agency securities, including Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association collateralized mortgage obligations that were purchased from 1993 Io 1994. At September 30, 1997 the fair value of these investments was approximately $23.5 m~]lion, which is 2% below cost. These investments are recorded in the financial stalements at fair value. The Board does not intend to sell these securities pdor to the eadier of (1) maturity or final paydown, or (2) when the fair value approximates cost. The Board currently has the ability Io hold these investments as it has sufficient liquidity to meet operational requirements. Legal risk is the exposure to a transaction being determined to be prohibited by law, regulation or contract. Management believes the level of legal risk exposure to the BOard's portfolio is minimal. Credit risk relates to whether or not Ihe Board will be able to recover its investments in a security at the security's maturity date. The Board's investments are categorized to provide an indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the Board. Category 1 includes investments thal are insured or registered, or securities held by the Board or its agent in the Board's name. Category 2 includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the counterparty's trust department or agent in the Board's name. Category 3 includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the counterparty or by its bust department or agent, bul not in the Board's name. Investments that are not evidenced by securities in physical or book entry form are not categorized. 26 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 2 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS - CONTINUED INVESTMENTS - CONTINUED Al September 30, 1997 lhe Board's investments were categorized as follows: Market Credit Risk Cate<]or'v Value Cateqory 1' U.S. Agency Securities $ 68,449,800 U.S. Treasury Obligations 20.309,391 Total Category 1 88~759r191 C.,ate~:,'v 2: Bankers' Acceptances 21.931.162 Commeroal Paper 19.772,244 Agreements 4.438,600 Repurchase Total Calegory 2 46~142~006 Not categorized: Investment in Deferred Compensation Mutual Fund 6.097.181 Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund 78,300.352 Total not categorized 84~397~533, Total investments including cash equivalents S 219~298,730, NOTE 3 -TRADE RECEIVABLES Trade receivables for enterprise funds are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts as follows: Allowance for Net Trade Doubtful Trade Receivables Accounts Receivables County Water and Sewer $ 1.905.111 $ - $ 1.905,111 Marco Water and Sewer 27.364 - 27.364 Goodland Water 18,523 - 1 8.523 Solid Waste Disposal 1.221,947 - 1,221.947 Emergency Medical Services 10.808.569 (10.202.126) 606,443 Airport Authority 30,165 - 30,165 Total $ 14~011.679 $ (10~202~126) S 3.809r553 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAl. STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 4 - INTERFUND RECEIVABLES {DUE FROM) AND PAYABLES (DUE TO) Due from and due to other funds at September 30, 1997 were as follows: FUND Due From Due To General Fund $ 3.082,137 Special Revenue Funds: Grante and Shared Revenues 19 0~9 Sheriff's C~ante 3,900 State Housing Incentive Partnership 4,573 8,473 19.089 Capital Projects Funds: Road Co. sm 30,000 30.000 Enterprise Funds: So,id Waste Disposal 62 * 62 PJrpo~t Aut/',odty 2.707.450 62 2.707,512 Trust and Agency Funds: State Court Administration 164o539 Confiscated Prope~ 3.900 Deposits 225,632 394.071 Total AJI Funds $ 3.120,672 $ 3,120,672 28 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD Off COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 ! NOTE 5 - FIXED ASSETS I A summary of changes in general fixed asset~ fo~ the year ended Seplembe; 30, 1997 is as follows: I Imp~vemenls Other Than Constr~clion Land Bu~ld~s Buildings Equipmen! In Pro~ss Total I Balance $011/96 $ 29.192,040 $ 95.041,450 $ 32.776.501 $ 34.085.385 $ 8,876,535 $ 199~71.91t Add,tiers 443.948 140,602 593.197 4, f 80,393 3,638.421 8,~.r'~1,561 iDeletions (2.337.701) (1.139.748) (3.477.449) Tmnsfef~ in 388.453 2.945.991 39.503 3.371.947 Transfem oul 1182,103} 1.3,6 t 52 (1.045.443) (3.332.444) (4.563.605) IBalance 9/30~? $ 29 835 9M $ 95.386.402 $ 36.312.074 $ 34 922 f37 $ 204.2971365 I Propdeta~/find property, planl and equipment at Seplember 30, 1997 consisted of the following: Im~'ovements Less: Other Than Accumulated ConstnJ(:tion Land Buildings Build~ngs Equipment Depreciation In PrOfess Total I Enteq:)rise Funds: County Water and Sewer $ 4.473.799 $ 11.5,026.924 $ 245,264,525 $ 4,391.462 $ (69.101,262) S 29.717.105 $ 329.772.553 I Marco Wale¢ ~ Sewer 860 4.743.740 (1.444.767) 3.299.833 ~land Wale~' 365 1.211.441 (772.348) 356.877 796.335 Solid Waste ~sposal 1.670.490 27 t. 130 t 0.640.340 683.342 (4.968.150) 214.~95 8.611.947 I E me(genc~ Id e~ical Services 221.588 3.127 2.148.240 (1. ! 6 f .366) 1.211.589 Aiq:~l Authority 1 ~289~400 t ~405~269 4~ t ! 5,6 ! 2 713~901 (375.664) 8937275 8;04 1 ~773 I Total Enterpttse Funds 7~434~914 1 t6~9247911 265~978~785 7~938~945 (77.823.577) 31 ~182~052 351~6347030 Internal Sewice Funds: I Information Technology 1.391.752 (678.694) ? 13.058 Self Insurance 40.502 (17.977) 22.525 i Office of Capital Pmjecls Management 495.239 (274.232) 221.007 Deparb'ne~t of Revenue 850.263 (388.217) 462.036 Fleet Managemenl 149~940 5~738~881 (2.744.055) 3~ 144~766 I Total Internal Service Funds 149~940 8~516~627 (4,103,175) 4~563~392 I T otal Prop~etary Funds $ 71434r914 $ f 1710741851 $ 265 978 78.5 $ 16,463 572 $ ~ $ 31~182.052 $ 35~i1911422 _ .I 29 COLLIER COUNTY 8OARD OI= COUNTY ~OMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM DEBT SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT The following is a summary of changes in general long-term debt for the year ended September 30, 1997: 000's Omitted October Debt Debt September 1, 1996 Issued Retired 30, 1997 General Obligation Bonds $ 7,240 $ $ (1,140) $ 6,100 Revenue Bonds And Certirmates of Indebtedness 47.585 14,870 (980) 61.475 Commercial Paper 19,287 4.800 (18.427) 5,660 Noles Payable 192 (123) 69 Accounts Payable 67 67 Accrued Compensated Absences 2,678 (465) 2,213 Capitalized Leases 26 1.551 (97) 1.480 Arbitrage Rebale 4 11 15 Total $ 77,012 $ 21,299 $ (21.232) $ 771079 The following is a summary of changes in proprietary fund long-term debt for lhe year ended September 30. 1997: 000's Omitled October Debt Debt Amortized September 1, 1996 Issued Retired Discoun! 30. 1997 Revenue Bonds $ 101,554 $ $ (3,236) $ 11 $ 98,329 Noles Payable 14,921 5,872 (2,005) 11 18,799 Capitalized Leases 112 (28) 84 Total $ 116,587 $ 5,872 $ 15,2691 $ 22 $ 117,212 30 Ill Il I Il - - IIll I I I .... Illlll I Il I Illl COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM DEBT - CONTINUED DESCRIPTIONS OF BOND ISSUES AND NOTES PAYABLE Bonds and notes payable at September 30, 1997 were composed of the following: General ObliRation Bonds $5,000,000 1989 Marco Island Beachfront Renourishment Facilities Limited General Obligation Bonds due in annual installments of $270,000 to $630,000 through July 1, 2000; interest at 6.60% to 7.10%. $ 1,765,000 $5,030,000 1996 Public Park and Recreation Municipal Service Taxing Unit General Obligation Refunding Bonds due in annual installmenls of $65,000 to $795,000 through July 1, 2003; interest at 4.00% to 4.20%. 4,335,000 Total General Obligation Bonds $ 6,100,000 Revenue Bonds and Certificates of Indebledness $5,000,000 1973 Improvement Revenue Certificates due in annual installments of $25,000 to $350,000 through July 1, 2003; interest at 5.50% to 6.25%. Race track revenues are pledged for the payment of these bonds. $ 1,845,000 $8,225,000 1992 Capital Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $240,000 to $635,000 through October 1, 2013; interest at 2.70% to 5.80%. Local government half-cent sales tax revenue is pledged for the debl service on these bonds. 7,215,000 $30,415,000 1994 Capital Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $1,090,000 to $2,790,000 through October 1, 2012; interest at 4.35% to 6.00%. Local government half-cent sales tax revenue is pledged for the debt service on Ihese bonds. 30,415,000 $5,770,000 1995 Road Improvement Refunding Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $290,000 to $510,000 through June 1, 2010; interest at 3.60% to 5,375%. Ninth cent and seventh cent gas tax revenues are pledged for debt service on these bonds. 5,160,000 $2,145,000 1996 Guaranteed Entitlement Revenue Refunding Bonds due in annual installments of $175,000 to $360,000 through October 1, 2002; interest at 4.19% fixed rate. State revenue sharing receipts are pledged for the debt service on these bonds. 1,970,000 $13,000,000 1997 Special Obligation Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $965,000 to $2,560,000 through March 1, 2004; interest at 3.70% to 4,35%. Non ad valorem revenues are pledged for debt service on these bonds. 13,000,000 $1,870,000 1997 Naples Park Area Stormwater Improvement Assessment Bonds due in annual installments of $75,000 to $185,000 through September 1, 2012; interest at 6.45% fixed rate. Slormwater improvement assessment proceeds are pledged for the debt service on these bonds. 1,870,000 Total Limited Obligation Revenue Bonds $ 61,475,000 IIIII' III II II IIII III ...... I COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 6 B ' t~ DESCRIPTIONS OF BOND ISSUES AND NOTES PAYABLE - CONTINUED Commercial Paper $6,970,000 Commercial Paper issued by the Florida Local Government Finance Commission Pooled Commercial Paper Program, variable rate for the current fiscal year of 3.84% to 4.19%, collateralized by non ad valorem revenue. $ 5,660,000 Notes Payable $160,500 1993 note payable to a financial institution, collateralized by ad valorem taxes collected within the Isle of Capri Fire Dislrict, payable in annual installments of $22,928 through April 2000. Pnterest payable al 6.63% per annum. $ 68,785 Enterprise Fund Revenue Bonds $1,960,000 1981 Marco Island Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $7,736 Io $100,293 through June 1, 2021; interest at 5.00%. Principal and inlerest are payable from the net revenues of the system and special assessment collections. $ 185,684 $468,500 1982 Goodland Water District Water Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $2,000 to $110,000 through September 1, 2021; interest at 5.00%. Principal and interest are payable from the net revenues of the system and special assessment collection s. 161,000 $1,250,000 1988 Marco Water and Sewer District Special Assessment Bonds due in annual installments of $125,000 through May 1, 1998; interest at 6.75% lo 8.00%. Principal and interest are payable from the net revenues of the system and special assessment collections on a subordinated basis to the 1981 Marco Island Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds. 55,000 $15,960,000 1990 Collier County Water and Sewer District Sewer Assessmenl Bonds due in annual installments of $290,000 Po $1,120,000 through October 1, 2011; interest at 6.10% lo 7.15%. Principal and interest are payable from special assessment collections and the net revenues of the system on a subordinated basis to the 1991, 1992 and 1994 County Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds. 2,525,000 $55,225,000 Collier County Water and Sewer Districl, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1991. Due in annual installments of $170,000 to $3,590,000 through July 1, 2021; interest at 4.40% to 6.50%. Principal and interest are payable from Ihe net operating revenues of the system, system development fees and special assessment collections. 24,640,000 $13,090,000 Collier County Water and Sewer District, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1992. Due in annual installments of $595,000 to $965,000 through July 1, 2010; inlerest at 3.20% to 6.375%. Collateralized by a parity first lien on the pledged revenues lisped on the $55,225,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1991. 9,950,000 Total carried forward $ 37,516,684 32 ..................... IIIII IIIIIII -- - II J! COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM DEBT - CONTINUED DESCRIPTIONS OF BOND ISSUES AND NOTES PAYABLE - CONTINUED Total brought forward $ 37,516,684 $24,225,000 1994 Taxable County Water and Sewer Refunding Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $375,000 to $2,315,000 through July 1, 2010; interest at 3.35% to 6.88%. Collateralized by a parity first lien on the pledged revenues listed on the $55,225,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1991. 21,190,000 $40,320,000 1994 County Water and Sewer Refunding Revenue Bonds due in annual installments of $55,000 to $4,315,000 through July 1. 2021; interest at 3.0% lo 5.35%. Collateralized by a parity first lien on the pledged revenues listed on the $55,225,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1991. 39,730,000 98,436,684 Unamortized bond discount (107,770) Total enterprise fund revenue bonds 98,328,914 Less current portion of bonds payable from restricted assets .... (3,376,737) Long-term portion of enterprise I~und revenue bonds $ 94,952,177 Enterprise Fund Notes Payable $5,890,100 note payable to private water and sewer company, payable through use of water and sewer system development fee credits by company or its assignees, or. Io the extent of unused credits, payable at the current cash value of the credits (minimum of the original face value) in 2006. Non-inlerest bearing note; interest imputed at 7.00%. $ 13,153 $1,469,999 County Water and Sewer District note payable to private developers, payable through use of water and sewer system development fee credits. Non-interest bearing note. 172,721 $41,167 County Water and Sewer District agreement with private developers payable Ihrough use of water and sewer system development fee credits. Non interest bearing agreement. 41,167 $14,547,667 State Revolving Fund Loan, to be drawn down as required for construction commitments, interest payable at 4.25% repayable in 20 annual payments commencing October 1, 1992, collateralized by a lien on pledged revenues consisting of net revenues (as defined in the loan resolution) from the operations of the County Water-Sewer System. proceeds derived from the levy of special assessments levied upon the properties benefited by the project, system development fees and connection fees. The lien shall be subordinate in all respects to liens placed upon pledged revenues established by bonded indebtedness. 11.607,768 Total carried forward $ 11,834,809 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM DEBT - CONTINUED DESCRIPTIONS OF BOND ISSUES AND NOTES PAYABLE - CONTINUED Total brought forward $ 11,834,809 $5,140,768 State Revolving Fund Loan to be drawn down as required for construction commitments, interest payable at 2.65% repayable in 5 semiannual payments commencing January 15. 1999. collateralized by a lien on pledged revenues consisting of net revenues (as defined in the loan resolution) from the operations of the County Water- Sewer System. system developmenl fees and connection fees. The lien should be subordinated in all respects to liens placed upon pledged revenues eslablished by bonded indebtness. 5.140.768 $2.000,000 Commercial Paper issued by the Florida Local Government Finance Commission Pooled Commercial Paper Program, variable rate for the current fiscal year of 3.84% to 4.19%. collateralized by non ad valorem revenue. 1,835.000 18.810.577 Unamortized discounts (11,402) Total enterprise fund notes payable 18.799.175 Less current portion of notes payable from unrestricted assets (215.639) Less current podion of notes payable from restricted assets (865,030) Long-term portion of enterprise fund notes payable $ 17.718,506 SUMMARY OF DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY The total annual debt service requirements to maturity of long-term debt. excluding compensated absences. capitalized leases and discounts, are as follows: General Long-Term Proprietary Debt Funds Totals 1998 $ 11,163.507 $ 10.744.766 $ 21.908.273 1999 11,368.176 11,305.908 22.674.084 2000 11.259,899 11.219.962 22,479,861 2001 7,426,287 11.678,702 19.104,989 2002 8.119.300 10.679.627 18.798.927 Thereafter 52,367,540 129,819.791 182.187,331 Total debt service requirement 101,704,709 185.448.756 287,153,465 Less amount representing interest (28,400,924) (68.201.495) (96.602.419) Total $ 73,303,785 $ 117.247.261 $ 190.551.046 m COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 6 ' B NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS m SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM DEBT - CONTINUED m SUMMARY OF DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO MATURITY - CONTINUED m The amount available in debt service ~unds to service general obligation bonds, revenue bonds and certificates o1' indebtedness, commercial paper and notes payable obligations are $88.980, $9.315,305, :$15,160 and $71,559, respectively. I INTEREST CAPITALIZED Interest costs on long-term debt incurred and capitalized during the year ended September 30, 1997 were as follows: I Total Interest Interest Cost Net Int?~;st Cost Incurred Capitalized Expense I Enterprise Funds $ 6,859,119 $ {61,223) $ 61797,896 I LEGAL DEBT MARGIN The Constitution of Ihe Slate of Florida and the Florida Statutes sel no legal debt limit. m RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS m official statements and Board resolutions authorizing the general obligation and revenue bonds establish certain accounts and determine the order in which certain revenues are Io be deposited into those accounts as well as eslablish reserve requirements. AJI required balances were mainlained. m Water and sewer revenue bonds are payable solely from and secured by a first lien upon and pledge of the net revenues and certain other fees and charges derived from the operation of Ihe Counly's water and sewer system. The pledge of the net revenues derived by the Board from the operation of the water and sewer system does not constitute a lien upon the water and sewer system or any other property of the County. mThe covenants of Ihe resolutions authorizing the County Water and Sewer District Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1991, 1992 and 1994 include, among other things, an obligaUon for the Board to fix, establish m and maintain such rates and collect such fees, rentals or other charges for the services and facilities of the water and sewer syslem, and to revise the same I'rom time to time whenever necessary, so as to always provide in each year net revenues, as defined in the resolutions authorizing the revenue bonds, which together with lhe system development fees and special assessment proceeds received in each fiscal year m shall be adequate lo pay at least 125% DJ' the annual debt service requirements for the Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds; provided, however, that riel revenues in each fiscal year shall be adequate to pay al least 100% of the annual debt service for the bonds. m The Marco Island Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1981 and Series 1988 along with the Goodland Water District Water Revenue Bonds require the Board to maintain such rates and fees (including special assessment proceeds) to provide revenue sufficient to pay necessa~ expenses of operating and maintaining m the systems and to meet at least 100% of the annual debt service for the bonds. The bond resolution of the $15,960,000 Collier County Water and Sewer District Sewer Assessment Bonds. Series 1990, provides for the establishment and maintenance of a reserve account in an amount equal to the reserve account requirement, which shall be maintained for the benefit of the holders of the bonds. The reserve account m requirement is defined as an amount equal to the lesser of ti) the maximum annual debt service for all outstanding bonds; (ii) 125% of lhe average annual debt service for all oulstanding bonds; or (iii) 10% of the aggregate proceeds of the bonds. m in the opinion of management, the water and sewer funds were in compliance with these covenants for the year ended September 30. 1997. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF' COUNTY COMMISSIONERS "' '"" NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE 6- LONG-TERM DEBT- CONTINUED LEASE OBLIGATIONS The Board has various capital lease commitments. At year end, equipment acquired through capital leases was recorded in the general fixed assets account group and in the proprietary funds in the amounts of $1,591,945 and $145,475, respectively. Capitalized leases payable at September 30, 1997 amounted to $1,564,231. These obligations, which are collaleralized by equipment and vehicles, have annual installments ranging from $246,514 to $403,185 including interest ranging from 0% to 6.0% and mature through 2002. Future minimum capital lease obligations as of September 30, 1997 were as follows: Internal General Service Long-Term Debt Funds Total 1998 $ 369,797 $ 33,388 $ 403,185 1999 356,798 33,388 390,186 2000 356,797 24,104 380,901 2001 356,798 356,798 2002 246,514 246,514 Total minimum lease payments 1.686,704 90,880 1,777,584 Less amount representing interest (206,636) (6,717) (213,353) Presenl value of minimum lease payments $ 1,480,068 $ 84,163 $1,564,231 The Board has entered into numerous operating leases. Rental expenditures for leased facilities and equipment for lhe fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 were $587.122. Commitments for fulure minimum operating lease payments, contingent rentals and subleases are not significant. 36 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 7 o REVENUE BONDS ADMINISTERED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA Section 206.41. Florida Statutes. imposes an excise tax on motor fuel sold in Florida. This tax is known as the Constitulional Gas Tax (also known as Ihe 5th and 6th Cent Gas Tax). This tax is collected by the State Department of Revenue and transmitted to the State Board of Administration. The State Board of Administration makes payments necessary Io reduce the bonded indebtedness issued pursuant to the provisions of the State Constitution for road and bridge purposes. Excess taxes are transmitted to the Stale Department of Transportation, which can appropriate funds for work done in Collier County and also transmit funds to Ihe Board itself lo fund highway capital improvements. In accordance with the above, the State Board of Administration administers Collier County Road Bond Certificates of Indebtedness dated 1979, of which $6,320,000 is outstanding as of September 30. 1997. This issue is not recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group, because Ihe principal and ir~turest are required to be paid solely from the gross revenue of Ihe Second Gas Tax administered by the State.. Board of Administration. These bonds are not an indebtedness ol~ Collier County. NOTE 8 - CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATIONS $1 Pine Industrial Park and Production Park Assessment Series 7,335,000 Rid.qe Naples Special Bonds, 1 993 During September 1993, the Board issued, on behalf of the property owners within the Naples Production Park and Pine Ridge Induslrial Park Districts, $17,335,000 of special assessment bonds. The bond proceeds from the issue were used to repay amounts previously borrowed under the Board's line of credit arrangement. Special assessments are pledged by property owners within the Districts. The Board is not obligated lo repay the special assessment debt if sufficient assessment funds are not available. The Board functions as agent for the property owners in collecting the assessmenls, forwarding the collections to bondholders, and initiating foreclosure proceedings, if appropriate. The special assessments received and the related debt service payments are accounled for in an agency fund on behalf of the property owners. As of September 30, 1997 these bonds have an outstanding principal amount of $14,395,000. ! ! COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE 9 - DEFEASED DEBT The Board has defeased certain outstanding bond issues by placing the proceeds of new bonds in irrevocable trusts to provide for all future debt service payments on the defeased debt. Accordingly, the trust accounts and the defeased bonds are not included in lhe Board's financial statements. At September 30, 1997 the following issues were considered defeased: Defeased Original Bonds Gener;~l Lon;I-Term Debt Debt Outstanding 1986 Capital Improvement Program Revenue Bonds, Sub-Series 5 Mode A $ 12,245,000 $ 10,2~3,000 Total Defeased General Long-Term Debt $ 12,245,000 $ 10,205,000 Defeased Original Bonds Enterprise Fund Debt Debt Outstanding 1983 County Water and Sewer District Refunding Bonds $ 22.000,000 $ 16.925,000 1991 County Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds (partially defeased $25,930.000) 55,225,000 25,930.000 Total Defeased Enterprise Fund Debt $ 77,225.000 $ 42,855,000 38 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 10 - BUDGET TO ACTUAL Accounling principles used to prepare the budget are differenl from those used to prepare Ihe financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The following table reconciles the amounts on the Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget to Actual (which is presented on a non-GAAP budgetary basis) to the amounts on the Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances (which is presented on a GAAP basis). Special Capital Expendable Revenue Projects Trust Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses (budgetary basis) $ 3.489.856 $ 8,742,400 $ 287,953 Basis difference: Deferred revenue - (4,880,388) - Interfund advance budgeted as operating transfer (453,908) - Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and olher financing uses (GAAP basis budgeted funds) 3,035,948 3,862,012 287,953 Entity difference: Non-budgeted funds: Public Guardianship Program (16,243) - Impact Fees Escrow ,56,970 Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses (GAAP basis) $ 3.019.705 $~ $~ ! ! ~ 39 B'e COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE~ 11 - CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL The following is a summary of changes in contributed capital: Counly Water Marc= Water Emergency and and Goodland Solid Waste Medical Airpoil Sewer Sewer Water Disposal Se~,~ces Aul~odty October 1, 1996 $ 213,896.777 $ 3.390.508 $ 813,338 $ 496,774 $ 1,089,809 $ 5,364,483 $ 225,051,689 Contributions Source: Granls - 870.490 870,490 Developers 6.594.714 300.000 6.894.714 Customers 11.62 t.257 11,621.257 Othm' Funds 78.332 4.570 82.902 Dispositions (151.?04} (1) (11.929) (133,281) (296,915) Depreciation (4.537.591~ (84.763) [20.333~ (4.189~ (134.143! (62.827'!, [4.843.846~1 September30. 1997 $ 227.501.7'85 $ 3.305,745 $ 793.004 $ 485.226 $ 822.385 $ 6.472 146 $ 239.380.291 Ut/ERNAL~£RVlC E.F_UHD S Office or Capital Information Self- Projects Departmenl Fleet Technology Insurance Management of Revenue Management Total October 1, 1996 $ 606,719 $ 7.559 $ 947,740 $ 12.589 $ 783.554 $ 2.358,161 Co~b"lbullons Other Funds 12.566 27.386 135.516 343.165 518.633 Dispositions (1.328) (824) (30) - (2.182) Depreciation (99.9741 (1.1911 {24.5632 (46.688~ (335.367) [507.783) September30. 1997 $ 517,983 $ 6.3665. 949773~9 S 101.38~7 $ 791.35~2 $ 2.366.8~ ao COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 12 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN Under separate agreements with the National Association of County Officers and the International City Managers Association, the Board offers its employees a choice of two deferred compensation plans created in accordance with Inlernal Revenue Code Section 457. The plans, available to all County employees, permit them to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The deferred compensation is not available to employees or their estate until termination, retirement, death or unforeseeable emergency. All amounts of compensation deferred under the plans, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, property, or rights are (until paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the Board (without being restricted to the provisions of benefits under the plans), subject only to the claims of the Board's general creditors. Participants' rights ~.'n. der the plans are equal to those of general creditors of the Board in an amount equal to the fair market value of their deferred compensalion account. Assets of the deferred compensation plans are recorded at fair market value and are accounted for in an agency fund. It is lhe opinion of lhe Board's legal counsel that the Board has no. liability for losses under the plans, but must exercise due care as would be expected of an ordinary prudent investor. The Board believes that it is unlikely it will use the assets Io satisfy the claims of general creditors in the future. GASB Statement 32, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan", was issued in October 1997. This statement establishes accounting and financial reporting standards for IRC Section 457 deferred compensalion plans of state and local governments and provides that the activities of the deferred compensation plan be reported as an expendable trust fund. The Statement is required to be adopted for periods beginning after December 31, 1998. The Board anticipates that il will adopl the provisions of GASB Statement 32 effective with the beginning of fiscal year 1998. NOTE 13 - PENSION PLAN OBLIGATIONS Relirement Plan The Board follows the provisions of GASB 27, "Accounting for Pensions by State and Local Governmental Employers", as described in the following disclosure. Plan Descriplion The Board contributes to the Florida Retirement System (the "System"), a cost-sharing, multiple-employer, defined benefit pension plan adminislered by the Slate of Florida, Division of Retirement. The System provides retirement and disability benefils, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The Florida Legislature established the System under Chapter 121, Florida Statutes, and has sole authority to amend benefits provisions. Each year the Rystem issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. The report may be obtained by wdting to the Florida Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement, 2639 North Monroe Street, Building C, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1560. Fundin.q Policy The System is non-contributory for employees and the Board is required to contribute at an actuarially determined rate. During the fiscal year, the rate was approximately 18% of annual covered payroll. The contributions of the Board are established and may be amended by the State Legislature. The Board's contributions to the System for the years ending September 30, 1997. 1996 and 1995 were $5,737,456, $5,266,510 and $4,816,900, respectively. 41 COLLIER COUNTY, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 14 - SEGMENT INFORMATION - ENTERPRISE FUNDS The Board maintains six enterprise funds which provide water, sewer, solid wasle disposal, emergency services and airport services. Segment informalion for the year ended September 30. 1997 is as follows: County Water Marco Water Goodland and Sewer and Sewer Water Operating revenue $ 37,471,873 $ 570.906 $ 193.752 Operaling expenses: Depreciation and amortization 8,398.840 117.417 56.859 Operating expenses 18,086.138 489,914 255.104 Operaling income (loss) 10.986.895 (36,425~ (118,211 ~ Operating grants . Net non-operating revenues (expenses) (1.899.750) 45.085 34.696 Income (loss) before operating transfers 9.087,145 8.660 (83.515I Operating transfers in 159.426 - Operating transfers out (65,437~ Net income (Ioss) $ 9.181.134 $ 8,660 $ (83.515) Current capitalconlnbulions, riel $ 14,184,632 $ . $ - Properly, plant and equipment: Additions $ 56.121.27~1 $~ $ ~ 331.633 Deletions $ (32,698,946) $ (5,381).. $ ~ Net wo~ing capital $ 65,097,833 $ 1.845.448 $ 422.895 Totalassets $ 430,694,227 $ 3,963.197 $ 1,350.650 Tolal long-latin liabilities $ 111,226,831 $ 182,315 $ 157,559 Total fund equity $~,, 306,691~038''' $ 3.531,15~9 $ 1,162 938 42 Emergency Solid Waste Medical Airport Disposal Services Authority Totals 11,544,655 $ 4.583.327 S 869.419 $ 55,233.932 275.736 223,712 95,884 9.160.448 12,309,644 8,129,324 1,208,095 40,478,219 (1,040,725) (3.7691709) (434.560) 5,587,265 407,199 46,542 453,741 1,701,759 47,325 (135,139), (206,024), 661,034 (3,722,384) (569,699), 5,381 4,211,470 - 4,370.896 (1,000) (155,416} (221,853) 661,034 $ 488,086 $ (725.115) $ 9,530.284 6,269 $ (133,2811 $ 870,489 $ 14,928,109 494,991 $ 12,780 $ 6,097,029 $ 63,057,704 (247,341) $ (650,631) $ (4,729.421} $____(38,331,7201. 18.756,613 $ 1,130,167 $ (850,250) $ 86,402,706 28,986,16===~2 $ 2,467,954 $ 10,580,657 $ 478,042,847 4.324,693 $ 321,849 $ 1,559,898$ 117.773,145 23,512,652 $ 2,019,907 $ 5,659,375 $ 342,577,069 43 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 15 - OPERATING TRANSFERS Operaling transfers for the year ended September 30, 1997 were as follows: FUND Transfers in Transfers out General Fund $ 1,286.955 $ 18,091.515 Special Revenue Funds: Road Districts 4.950,000 9.000 Water Management and Pollution Control 47,500 681.500 Unincorporated Areas 289.000 794,000 Grants and Shared Revenues 289,040 54,000 Improvement Dist,'icls 1,203.200 7.000 Miscellaneous Fee 53,019 4:l.395 Museum 305,800 - Fire Control Districts 358,800 - Public Guardianship 40,395 - Lighting Distncts 293.600 Toudst Developmenl 1,792,236 7,536,754 3,671,731 Debt Service Funds: Road and Other Improvements 4,281,673 3,100,000 Special Obligation Revenue Bonds 5.000 Stormwaler Improvement 54,100 4,340.773 3,100,000 Capital Projects Funds: County-Wide Capital Improvements 2.768,200 Parks Improvements 144,500 County. Wide Library 25,119 Parks Impact Districts 1.477 51.527 Road Construction 1,453.972 Water Management 1,238,600 Olher Capital Projects 3,329.200 392.458 7,481,977 1,923.076 Enterprise Funds: County Water and Sewer 155,360 Emergency Medical Service 4,211,470 1,000 Airport Au thority 155.416 4,366.830 156,416 Internal Service Funds: Information Technology 10,600 Office of Capital Projects Management - 255,200 Department of Revenue 7,000 28,000 Fleet Management 9,000 105,000 26,600 388,200 Trust and Agency Funds: State Court Administration 3,020,500 154,539 Criminal Justice 386.000 Confiscated Property 85.912 Utility Fee 93.000 3,020,500 729,451 Total $ 28,060.389 S 28,060,389 44 NOTE 16 - FUND EQUITY Contributed capital: Balances represent capital granls and contributions received from developers, customers and other governments or funds. Retained Earnin_qs Enlerprise funds - Reserved for revenue bond retirement: Balances are reserved in conjunction with the issuance of County Water and Sewer, Marco Water and Sewer and Goodland Water revenue bond issues. They have been funded by initial deposits from the bond proceeds and by transfers from the operating accounts of the appropriale funds. The use of monies in the sinking fund is restricted to the payment of principal and interest on long-term debt. Enterprise funds - Reserved for renewal and replacement: Balances are reserved in conjunction with the issuance of County Water and Sewer and Marco Water and Sewer revenue bond issues. They are funded by Iransi~ers from the operating accounts of the appropriate funds. The use of monies in the renewal and replacement fund is restricted to funding Ihe cost of extensions, enlargements and additions 1o. replacement or major repair of capital assets. Enlerprise funds - Unreserved: Balances are not reserved for specific purposes. Internal service funds - Unreserved: Balances are not reserved for specific purposes. Fund Balances Reserved Reserved for Iong-lerm notes receivable: Balances represent long-term loans made to individuals which do not constitute expendable available financial resources. Reserved for encumbrances: Balances are segregated for expenditure upon vendor performance. Reserved for inventory: Balances represent items which are not considered available and spendable resources. Reserved for prepaid costs: Balances represent insurance, travel and other expenses paid in advance and which are not considered available and spendable resources. Reserved for debt service: Balances represent monies legally restricted to the payment of principal and interest on long-term debt. Reserved for trust fund purposes: Balances are reserved as legally mandated or as otherwise stipulated by a donor. Fund Balances I,!qreserved Designated for impact fees: Balances represent affordable housing impact fees deferred by the Board of County Commissioners to be funded by the Board in the future. Designated for debt service: Balances are designated for the payment of principal and interest on long-term debt. Designated for future capital projects: Balances are designated for future capital project expenditures. Undesignated: Balances are not designated for specific purposes. 45 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 17 - RISK MANAGEMENT BQARD'S SELF-INSURANCE The Board is exposed Io various risks of loss related to tort; theft of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injudes to employees and natural disasters. A self-insurance internal service fund is maintained by the Board to administer insurance activities relating to workers' compensation, health and property and casualty, which covers general, property, auto, public official and crime liabilities. Under these programs, the self- insurance fund provides coverage up to a maximum amount for each claim. The Board purchases commercial insurance for claims in excess of coverage provided by the self-insurance fund and for all other covered dsks of loss. County's Excess Carrier's Claim Tv~e Coverage Coverage Property damage claims $100,000 each $100,000 - $5,000,000 Aulo liability claims $100,000 each $100,000 - $1,000,000 Employee health claims $125,000 each $125,000 - $1,000,000 Workers' compensation claims $150,000 each $150,000 - $5,003,000 The aggregale loss exposure on workers' compensation and property and casualty claims is $1,240,000. Settled claims have not exceeded the insurance provided by third party carriers in any of the past four years. Charges to operating departments are based upon amounts believed by management to meet the required annual payouts during the fiscal year and to pay for the estimated operating costs of the programs. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 the operating departments were charged approximately $6,108,626 for workers' compensation, health and property and casualty self-insurance programs. The claims loss reserve for workers' compensation, health and property and casualty of $ 5,723,448 reported at September 30 1997 was calculated by third party actuaries based upon GASB Statement 30, "Risk Financing Omnibus", which requires that a liability for claims be reported when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of that loss can be reasonably estimated. The estimated liabilities for unpaid losses related to workers' compensation and property and casualty were discounted at 4.5%. 46 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE 17 - RISK MANAGEMENT - CONTINUED BOARD'S SELF-INSURANCE - CONTINUED Changes in the self-insurance claims payable for fiscal year 1996 and 1997 were as fcllows for the Board: Property and Group Workers' Casualty Health Compensation Total Balance October 1, 1995 $ 618,643 $ 608,000 $ 3,561,374 $ 4,788,017 Current year claims incurred and changes in estimates 499,494 3,655.423 1,588,094 5.~'43.011 Claim payments (238,075) (3,713,423) (1,516,391) (5,467,889) Balance September 30, 1996 880,062 550,000 3,633,077 5,063,139 Current year claims incurred and changes in estimates 1,113,267 4,357,053 1,963,319 7,433.639 Claim payments (360,581) (4,197,998) (2,214,751) (6,773,330) Balance September 30. 1997 $ 1,632.748 $ 709.055 $ 3.381.645 $ 5.723,448 NOTE 18 - LANDFILL LIABILITY On May 1, 1995 the Board entered into an agreement with a company for the privatization of the Board's landfill Under the contract, the is responsible for the daily operations, capital improvements, operations. company closure, postclosure and financial assurance requirements of the Naples and Immokalee landfill sites. The Board is responsible for staffing and operating the scale house at each site. Contract provisions provide the Board with early lerminations options. Upon exercising early termination, the Board would be required to make payments to the company I'or capital expenditures, management fees and additional operating fees. The Board's estimated liability in connection with the landfills is included in the enterprise fund balance sheet. ! ! COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 NOTE 19 -DEFICIT RETAINED EARNINGS The Airport Authority enterprise fund has a deficit retained earnings balance of ($812,771), and total fund equity of $5,659,375. NOTE 20 - SIGNIFICANT CONTINGENCIES LITIGATION The Board is involved as defendant or plaintiff in cerlain litigation and claims arising in the ordinary course of operations. In the opinion of legal counsel, the range of potential recoveries or liabilities will not materially affect the financial position of the Board. ~T~TI~ AND FEDERAl, GRANTS Grant monies received and disbursed by the Board are for specific purposes and are subject to review by the grantor agencies. Such audits may result in requests for reimbursement due to disallowed expenditures. Based upon prior experience, the Board does not believe that such disallowances, if any, would have a material effect on the financial position of the Board. NOTE 21 - SIGNIFICANT COMMITMENTS CONSTRUCTION COMMITMENTS Expended as of Project September 30, Future Authorization 1997 Commitments Parks $ 1,478,807 $ 240,882 $ 1.237,925 Roads 31,021,315 27,813,953 3,207,362 Utilities 34,941,984 21.136.166 13,805,818 Landfill expansion and closure 874,322 505,690 368,632 Buildings 10,923,029 9,010,159 1,912,870 Airporls 761,476 577,710 183,766 Beach Resloration 5,523,527 3,537,779 1,985,748 Stormwater Drainage 493,584 488,163 5,421 Total $ 86,018,044 $ 63,310,502 $ 22,707,542 ROAD AND REGIONAL PARK IMPACT FEE AGREEMENT~ In the past, the Board has acquired right-of-ways and received beach parking and road construction services from various developers in exchange for impact fee credits. Amounts granted for impact fee credits were based on the market value at the time the property, improvement or services were received. The developers, their successors or assignees may utilize the road impact fee credits for future development activities. No time limits are set for use of the credits. As the credits are consumed, impact fee revenue is recognized. At September 30, 1997 the Board had outstanding regional park impact fee and road impact fee agreements with developers of $73,283 and $1,510,935, respectively. 48 I I I .... IIIIIIIIIII ................ ' ................... I COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTES TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30. 1997 NOTE 22 - PRIOR-PERIOD ADJUSTMENT Pursuant to adopting GASB Statement 31. "Accounting and Financial Repoding for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools". the difference between the carrying value of the investment portfolio and the fair value of the investments is shown as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings/fund balance. The fair value of the portfolio was arrived at through a matrix pricing scheme as calculated by the County's custodial bank. First Union National Bank. The adjustment resulted in an equity decrease across fund types of ($1.734.360). ~ I IIII I IIII III I II ..................................... I I I I COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I MANAGEMENT LETTER[ I SEPTEMBER 307 1997 I I I I I I I I I I III II1~11 III I ..................... I I I .............. I IIIIIIII II ! ARTHU R 6- I /- NDERSEN I Arthur Andersen I.I.P I MANAGEMENT LETTER PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA Suite 100 Northea.~t lhlrd A~t'nue Fort Lauderdale FI. 337-O1 - I 1~, I ~-~t 5Z3 4433 To the Board of County Commissioners I CoUier County, Florida: I We have audited the financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Board of County Conunissioners (the "County") for the year ended September 30, 1997 and have issued our report thereon dated i December 19, 1997. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the I United States. Those standards require that we plan and the audit perform to obl2Li/1 reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The purpose of this letter is to comment on those matters described in Rule 10.554(1)(e) as required by the Rules of the Auditor General for the State of Florida. Accordingly, in connection with our audit of the financial statements of the County, as described in the first paragraph, we report the following: I CURRENT YEAR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REVENUE COLLECTIONS PROCESS I The County collects approximately $76 million annually from charges for services, impact fees and other miscellaneous revenue. Most of these revenues are collected at the County's Department of Revenue. We I noted several instances where the amounts charged to the County's customers for impact fees, permit application fees, and miscellaneous services (e.g. photocopying) were either inconsistently or incorrectly computed. The County could improve internal controls over the cash receipts function by ensuring that:. I · Employees are properly trained with respect to the amounts to be charged for services rendered. · The amounts charged are properly posted. I · The customer receipt includes a description of the item or service sold and how the amount charged was computed. · Water and sewer impact fee agreements between the County and developers are properly executed and that the fees are properly charged in accordance with the applicable ordinance. ! I ,ARTHUR 6 13 I /ANDERSEN I CLOSING THE BOOKS The County significantly improved the closing the books process during fiscal 1996/97. We noted several I opportunities to further enhance the procedures implemented during fiscal 1996/97. The County should consider the following: i · Periodic (e.g. quarterly) reconciliations of account balances with respective constitutional officers. · Reconciliation of the water and sewer accounts receivable general ledger accounts on a montldy basis with the accounts receivable aging report prepared by the Department of Revenue. · Review the comprehensive annual financial report during off-peak periods for opportunities to I streamline disclosures. · Perform a time survey to identify peaks and valleys in the staff's workload which could create opportunities to move some of the yearend closing processes (e.g. fixed asset accounting, and other I standard accruals) to slower times of the year. · Ensure all general ledger accounts are reviewed and reconciled at least quarterly. · Develop a yearend closing computer template that lists the financial information required of the constitutional officers and the related reporting deadlines. I GRANTS ADMINISTRATION I Controls could be improved by establishing procedures over accounting for and monitoring compliance with grant requirements, by implementing the following recommendations: I 1. Implement a formal procedure requiring persons responsible for administering programs to notify the finance depart~nent of grant or award activity, including when grants are approved by the Board, then again when expenditures commence. I 2. Personnel responsible for administering grants should read the executed grant agreements (including the expenditures allowed, reporting requirements and other compliance requirements) for each grant when the agreement is received from the grantor agency. In addition, the program administrator I should compare the approved requirements to the initial application to ensure the actual request the same as the approved requirements. I 3. Require persons responsible for administering programs to develop and utili:~e compliance checklists, including reporting requirements, for each grant. These checklists should be periodically reviewed by the Internal Audit department. I 4. Review grant expenditures on a monthly basis for propriety, and prepare and update a summary schedule of expenditures and revenues on a quarterly basis. Reconcile revenues and expenditures to the general ledger, and to each other (as revenues recognized should be equal to expenditures}, to I ensure revenue recognition is proper. r I III IIII ' III I II I II i,,, i~l ~ ~ ll~l i ....... I AARTH U R NDERSEN -3- 5. For Sheriff grants recorded by both the Sheriff and the Board of County Commissioners, reconcile the grant amounts recorded by the Sheriff to the amounts recorded at the Board of County Commissioners on a monthly basis. Eliminating entries should then be prepared at year-end for those grants recorded at both the Board of County Commissioners and the Sheriff. For any future Sheriff grant monies received, the Sheriff should record all revenues and expenditures associated with the;e grants. These amounts do not need to be recorded again at the Board of County Commissioners YEAR 2000 SYSTEM ISSUES As the next century approaches, there is growing concern about data processing difficulties being created by date codings of transactions for after I999. For years example, some computer systems will read only the last two digits of the year 2000 and interpret the date as 1900; others may not recognize the value and display an input error message, and some may crash. We are aware that the County is in the process of making their applications year 2000 compliant but would like to emphasize the importance of this conversion. The greatest risk tends to be with customized mainframe programs, including new ones. Standard packages, software covered by maintenance contracts and microcomputer programs generally involve less risk, but they may also have shortcomings. Programs, data files, system interfaces, electronic and written reports, networks and hardware can cause problems for functions that use or calculate dates, times and ages. Upgrading will involve, in the many cases, replacement of systems and/or extensive reprogram ming. Before 2000, the greatest risks will involve forward-looking information, such as lease contracts, future effective insurance policies, present values, cash payment/collection schedules, deferred revenue, depreciation, long-term claim payout analyses, budgeting and forecasting. Other problems may not surface until the next decade, when historical data begins to include year 2000 transactions (e.g., in policy master files, aging reports, accruals and payroll). We understand that the County has completed a technology needs assessment and has issued a joint request for proposals with the Sheriff's Office for new computer systems. The County should continue its efforts to ensure that its computer systems are fully integrated and year 2000 compliant. INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONTROL REVIEW In a complex information systems environment such as that of Collier County, it is essential to establish and maintain organizational controls to ensure system integrity. We noted organizational controls to be adequate. However one exception noted was that the County's Internal Audit Department does not perform EDP audits over any of the data processing departments. EDP audits should be performed on an annual basis. AARTH U R - NDERSEN -4' FIXED ASSETS The subsidiary ledgers supporting fixed assets require many manual adjustments to reconcile to the general ledger. The majority of these adjustments are the result of the transfer of assets between various funds. The County should consider implementing a system that can track aU movements of assets via the computer. In addition, the County should periodically reconcile the amount of capital outlays to the fixed asset lisi~ng, and this listing to the General Fixed Asset Account Group or the Proprietary Fund fixed asset account. This would assist in ensuring proper recording of account balances at yearend, as well a~ ensuring aU fixed assets are accounted for within the correct fund type. STATUS OF PRIOR YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations contained in this section are those that were not implemented or were only partially implemented by the Board during the current year. Certain other prior year recommendations, which are still applicable, have been repeated in the current year comments and recommendations. All other prior year comments have been fully implemented and were not repeated in this section. Recommendation Current Status ACCOUNTING POLICIES Fixed Assets In 1996, the Board made several acquisitions of property Guidelines have been established for to be used in operations. These acquisitions included a fixed asset recordation in order to building that had a significant piece of land attached, ensure that assets of a depreciab[e However, the entire purchase was treated as a building nature are not combined with non- and the total land and building cost is currently being depreciable assets. No instances of amortized. The County should separate the cost of the incorrect combining of assets were noted land from the building to ensure amounts are properly during fiscal year 1997 by the Clerk's reported over the life of the asset. Finance Depa~h~ent. Internal Service Fund The County operates an 800 MHZ system for An internal service fund was not communication for various user departments. The established for the 800 MHZ system as it operaffng fees are accounted for within a capital projects was not managements intent to recover fund. The actual operation of the communication costs from the depa,t,,,ents using the system is more closely related to the type of activities system. With no user charges, the typically accounted for in an internal service fund. The internal service fund is unnecessary. Board should consider accounting for user charges within an internal service fund. / NRTHUR 6 DERSEN -5- Recommendation Current Status Amortization Of Contributed Capital Contributed capital is currently being amortized by the While management concurred witls the County over 40 years based upon the net book value finding regarding the amorti,,~Lion'of rather than the total contributed amount. In addition, contributed capital, the investment of all contributed assets are being amortized over 40 years time required to adjust contributed without regard to the actual expected useful life of the capital to a more reasonable value was assets. The County should amortize contributed capital not cost beneficial. In order to correctly using the original value of the contributed asset. Also, value contributed capital, all related the remaining useful life of the capital contributed asset contribution dates would need to should be monitored and used in the amortization be factored in and caught up to the process to ensure that contributed capital is properly measurement date. Management is stated, currently assessing the feasibility of using a rational estimate to achieve a more appropriate valuation. Capital Pro_iect Budgets For fiscal 1995, the County appropriated over $74 A five-year Capital Improvement ~ million for capital projects, of which $30 million was Element was adopted for fiscal year expended. Many of these projects are constructed over 1997. The County is currently exploring periods in excess of one year. The funding sources are the feasibility of discontinuing annual typically non ad valorem taxes and/or impact fees. The appropriations for capital projects and County should budget all Capital Project funds on a budgeting on a project basis. However, project basis and discontinue annual appropriations, there exist system limitations which The Company should consider a five year capital have prohibited full implementation of budget, these recommendations. OTHER REQUIRED COMMUNICATIONS In connection with our audit of the financial statements of the Board, we report the following matters described in Rule 10.554(1)(e) as required by the Rules of the Auditor General for the State of Florida: 1. No inaccuracies, irregularities, shortages, defalcations, and/or violations of laws, rules, regulations, and contractual provisions were reported in the preceding annual financial audit. 2. The financial report of the Board of County Commissioners ("Board") filed with the Department of Banking and Finance, State of Florida, pursuant to Section 218.32, Florida Statutes, is substantially in agreement with the general purpose financial statements of the Board as of September 30, 1997. TM NDERSEN -6- 3. The Board is not and was not during the fiscal year in a state of financial emergency as a consequence of conditions described in Section 218.503(1), Florida Statutes. 4. No violations of laws, rules, regulations and contractual provisions were discovered witl'~n the scope of the financial audit that may or may not have materially a~ected the f~ancial statements, except for potential non-compliance with Chapter 129, Florida Statutes relatir, g to the preparation and adoption of the County's budget and tax levies for the State Court of Administration. This matter is currently in dispute. 5. No illegal or improper expenditures were discovered within the scope of the audit that may or may not have materially affected the financial statements. 6. No matters requiring correction (as defined by Rules of the Auditor General 10.55411][e]7.) that did or did not materially affect the financial statements noted. were 7. Collier County, a political subd.:vision of the State of Florida was established in 1923 by the Florida State Legislature. The County is governed by a Board of County Commissioners which consists of five members elected within single member districts. In addition, there are five Constitutional Officers; the Tax Collector, Property Appraiser, Sheriff, Clerk of Circuit Court and Supervisor of Elections. The Constitutional Officers are elected county wide. The County's blended component units consist of organizations whose respective governing Boards are composed entirely of the Board of County Commissioners serving ex-officio. These entities are legally separate, however financial support has been pledged and financial or operational policies may be significantly influenced by the County. Collier County Water and Sewer District The District was established by Chapter 88-499, Laws of Florida, to provide water, sewer and effluent services to certain portions of the unincorporated area of Collier County. The District currenUy operates three wastewater treatment facilities and two water treatment plants. Marco Island Water and Sewer District The District was established by Collier County Ordinance 77-58 under authority g~anted by Chapter 153, Part ITl, Florida Statutes. The District provides sewer services to customers on a portion of Marco Island. Goodland Water District The District was established by a Special Referendum Election authorized by Collier County Ordinance 75-5 and Section 125.01(c0 of Florida Statutes. The District provides potable water service to the residents of Goodland. 6 AARTH U R NDERSEN -7- CoWer ¢ount~ Airport Au~orit~ The Authority was established by Collier County Ordinance 95-67 and Section 332.001 through 332.120, Florida Statutes. The Authority provides Collier County with the services of three airports; The lmmokalee Regional Airport, the Marco Island Executive Airport a~.d Everglades City Airpark. This report is intended solely for the information of the management of the Board and the Auditor General for the State of Florida. However, this repor~ is a ma~er of public record and its distribution is not limited. ~ ~ LLP Fort Lauderdale, Florida, December 19, 1997. County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT co~uE, cou~r~ 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES. FLORIDA 33941-3044 CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT Dwight E. Brock COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS March 17, 1998 Mr. Thomas Bradley Arthur Andersen LLP 100 Northeast Third Avenue Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301-1166 Dear Mr. Bradley: We have reviewed your firm's Management Letter regarding the audit of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, for thc fiscal year ended September 30, 1997. In accordance with Chapter 10.550, Rules of the Auditor General and Section 11.45 of thc Florida Statutes, your firm's Management Letter and the attached written statements of responses will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners on March 24, 1998 along with the presentation of thc Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The attached statement contains a response to all of the Current Year Comments and Recommendations listed in the Management Letter. Respectfully, Clerk of the Circuit Court Enclosures ....... , , [ [[ [[[[ I I[[ I [ Ill l[ Il I I ]l ..... Ill ....... [[[] [mn[[ ..... I I i MANAGEMENT LETTER RESPONSES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Revenue Collection Process Management believes that this recommendation should differentiate between revenue collection and calculation. The mission statement of the Department of Revenue Services states that this department is intended to be a revenue collection hub for the County. Thc internal control structure requires the segregation of duties, resulting itt the Revenue Services Department being responsible for collecting the money, not establishing the rates to be charged. The revenue collection software is designed to provide a controlled environment in which rates charged are hard coded into the system and Revenue Services personnel do not have the ability to make changes without appropriate approval. The noted inconsistencies resulted from the misapplication of charges made in various departments, unrelated to thc Department of Revenue Services. We fully agree that steps must be taken to ensure that an objective standard is used for each charge levied by Collier County. These charges should be consistently and uniformly applied with staff interpretation being kept to a minimum. The Department of Revenue Services will be asked to participate in the coordination of fee computation standards, as will all dcpartmcnts with the authority to invoice. With the standards firmly established, increased training will create an environment in which all levels of staff can meaningfully assess the amounts charged. Closin~ the Books Management agrees that several opportunities remain to improve the efficiency of financial reporting for Collier County, Florida. Thc most significant challenge facing thc Finance Department is the application of thc audit timctable. Management stresses in its response to this recommendation that all general ledger accounts are already reviewed and reconciled on a quarterly, and in some cases monthly, basis. The process of closing the books is concentrated in the Clcrk of thc Circuit Court's Finance Department. In many cases the Clerk's Finance Department is totally reliant on multiple Board departments supplying critical information to it in a timely manner. Significant gains Can be made by communicating thc information needs of Finance to the Board departments earlier in the closing cycle. Grants Administration We concur with your comments and are already working on implementing changes. Since there is not a centralized grant administrator, we are developing periodic grant information sessions to provide an opportunity to work with the departments on I I establishing some of thc recommended procedures. Steps arc also being takcn to streamline thc Sheriff's grant process beginning with the 1999 fiscal year. Quarterly I records to the Sheriff's records will begin in the current fiscal year. rcconciliation o['our i In addition, we arc in thc proccss of designing a database for grant management purposes. This will provide easier tracking of general grant information as well as revenues, expenses and cash receipts for the various reporting requirements. I Year 2000 Issues i Management is well aware of the significant challenges and concerns regarding the Year 2000 Issues. The County has already completed a technology needs assessment and hca gone through the request for proposal and vendor presentation process for a r. ew i computer system. To ensure this computer system is fully integrated and Year 2000 compliant, this process was jointly undertaken with other key user departments including the Office of Management and Budget, the ShcriWs Office and the Purchasing I Department. Information Systems Control Review I Management agrees with your comment that thc County's Internal Department does not currently perform electronic data processing audits over any of the data processing I departments. The Internal Audit Department intends to expand its audit work plan in the next fiscal year to include annual electronic data processing audits. I Fixed Assets Management recognizes the current fixed asset system has limitations which result in an I excess of manual asset tracking and adjustments. The need for a more technologically advanced and automated system has been addressed in the technological needs assessment study and the Year 2000 request for proposal process. A more advanced I system would streamline the reconciliation of the amount of' capital outlay to the fixed asset listing process which would in turn make the year-end closing procedure less cumbersome. ! II 6 ~ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 TOGETHER WITH REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30~ 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 1 FINANCIAL b--'I'ATEMENTS Combined Balance Sheet - Ail Fund Types and Account Group 2 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - All Governmental Fund Types and Expendable Trust Fund 3 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Al/Governmental Fund Types 4 Notes to Financial Statements 5 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Combining Balance Sheet - Fiduciary Fund Type 9 Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities- Agency Fund 10 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS 11 MANAGEMENT LETFER 12 ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP 6 I REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ! Honorable Dwight £. Brock I Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County, Florida: We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Clerk of the Circuit Court (the 'Clerk") as of and for the year ended September 30, 1997, as listed in the Table of Contents. These financial statements and the supplementary information referred to below are the responsibility of the Clerk's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the supplementary information based on our audiL We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted audiUng standards and the standards I applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards (1994 Revision), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the Clerk and are not intended to present fairly the financial position of Collier County, and the results of its operations and the cash flows of its 1 proprietary fund types in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. ha our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Clerk as of September 30, 1997, and the results of its operations for the year then 1 ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report, dated November 26, 1 1997, on our consideration of the Clerk's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements of the Clerk taken as a whole. The supplementary information included on pages 9 and 10 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. LLP Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 26, 1997. [ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA~ I CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES AND EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND .FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Fiduciary Governmental Fund TyTes Fund Type To~i Special Expendable (Merno"andum Genera] Revenue Trust OnJy) REVENUES: Charges for services $3,927,317 $ 203,387 S 94,635 S4,225,339 Miscellaneous 267.063 59,065 2,06~_ 328,194 Total revenues 4,194.380 262,452 _ 96.701 _ 4,553.533 EXPENDITURES: Current- General government: Personal services 5.618,553 . 5.618,553 Operating expenditures 1.012..369 4,500 35,852 1.052.721 Capital outlay 243,621 23,194 53.39~. 320 214 Total expenditures 6.874.543 27,694 89,25_1 6 991 488 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (2,680.163) 234,75~_ 7,450 ~ OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Opera ting transfers in 4,345,100 - 4,345,100 Operating transfers out (1,664,937) ~.1.664t937) Total other financing sources (uses) 2,6F~3,1 63 .. 2,6~80,1 63_ Excess of revenues and other financing sources (uses) over expenditures 234,758 7,450 242,208 FUND BALANCE - October 1, 1996 856,865_ ... 22,205 879,070 FUND BALANCE- September 30, 1997 $ - ~ ~ ~ I The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. I I -3- COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 I1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIF-R: The following is a summary of the more significant accounting principles and polities: (a) Defining the Governmental ReportinR Entity- The Clerk, &s an elected constitutional officer and county agency, is considered a part of Collier County, Florida (primary government). As such, the Clerk's financial statements are included in the general purpose financial statements of Collier County. Based on the criteria established by GASB No. 14, there are no component unitSincluded in the Clerk's financial statements. Cot run~ Accounting- The accounts of the Clerk are organized on the basis of funds and an account group, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund and account group are accounted for with a separate set of self-balanci~g accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures, as appropriate. Government resources are allocated to, and accounted for in individual funds, based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. The following fund types and account group are used by the Clerk: Governmental Fund Type General Fund - The General Fund is used to account for ali financial transactions applicable to the general operations of the Clerk which are not required to be accounted for in another fund. Special Revenue Fund - The Special Revenue fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted by legal requirements, regulatory provisions or administrative action. Fiduciary Fund Type Trust and Agency Fund~ - Trust and Agency Funds used to are account for held by public officials in a trustee capacity or as an agent for individuals, private organizations, other governments and/or other funds. Account Group General Long-Term Debt - This self-balancing account group is used to account for compensated absences. (c) Measurement Governmental Fund Type - The General and Special Revenue Funds are accounted for on a "spending" or "financial flow" measurement focus. This means that only current assets and current Liabdities are included on the balance sheet. Accordingly, any reported undesignated fund balance (net current assets) is considered a measure of available, spendable or appropriable resources. Governmental Fund type operating statements present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. Fiduciary Fund Type . The Expendable Trust Fund is accounted i~or in essentially the same manner as Governmental Funds. The Agency Fund is custodial in nature (assets equal liabLlities) and does not involve the measurement of results of operations. Account Group - The General Long-Term Debt Account Group is concerned only with the measurement of financial position. It is not involved with the measurement of results of operations. Long-term debt~, ~,hich are not intended to be financed through Fiduciary Funds, are accounted for in the General Long-Te~ Debt Account Group. (d) Basis of Accounting. Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures are recognized in the accounts and reported in the Ftnancial statements. Basis of accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. The modified accrual basis of accounting is folJowed by the General, Special Revenue and Agency Funds. The modification in such method from the accrual basis is that revenues are recorded when they become measurable and available as net current assets. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred, except expenditures covering multiple periods. (e) Budl~etary Process- Chapter 129, Florida Statutes, governs the preparation, adoption and amendment process of the Clerk's annual budget. The Clerk's budget and amendments are prepared independentJy of the Board of County Commissioners and are approved by the Florida State Department of Revenue. A copy of the approved budget is provided to the Board of County Commissioners. The budget for the General Fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis. The level of control for appropriations is exercised at the fund level. l0 Fixed Asset_,~- Acquisitions of tangible personal property are recorded as expenditures in the Clerk's Genera] Fund at the time of purchase. These assets are reported to the ColLier County, Florida, Board of County Commissioners and are recorded in the County's General Fixed Assets Account Group. ! I I I o6o (_~) Compensated Absences- It is the Clerk's policy to allow employees to accumulate an unlimited number of hours of unused sick leave and up to 240 hours of unused vacation leave, termination, Upon employ~s are vested in a portion of the unused sick leave based upon length of service (with a maximum payout of !,040 sick hours). Ali employees are vested in 100% of allowable accumulated vacation hours. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, the liability relating to the vested calculated amount of such unused sick leave and the full amount of the allowable accumulated vacation leave is recorded in the accompanying financial statements. Because the amount of accrued compensated absences would not normally be liquidated with expendable available resources, it is recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group. Ih) To'al Coh, mn on Combined Balance Sheet. The total column on the combined balance sheet is captioned MMemorandum Only" to indicate that it is presented only to facilitate financial analysis. Data in this column does not present financial position or result_s of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Neither is such data compar~,,ble to a consolidation. [nterfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. {2~CAS[t AND INVF, STMENT~. .D. eposits- At September 30. 1997, the amount of the Clerk's deposits with financial institutions was $9,962,580. These deposits were entirely covered by federal depository insurance or by co[lateral pursuant to the Florida Security for Public Deposits Act (Florida Statutes Chapter 280). At September 30, 1997, the investments with trustee totaled $1,383,515, which equals its market value. These investments are deferred compensation plan assets which are invested in mutual fund pools (commercial and bankers' acceptances) and are not specifically identified or segregated in the Clerk's name and, therefore, paper are not categorized to give the level of risk assumed at year-end. This amount is not required to be categorized pursuant to GASB Statement Number 3, "Deposits with Financial Institutions, Investments (including Repurchase Agreements) and Reverse Repurchase Agreements,' because it is not represented by underlying securities in either physical or book entry form. (3) RETIREMENT PLAN: The Clerk early implemented the provisions of GASB 27, Accounting for Pensions by State and Local Government Employers, in the following disclosure. Plan Description- The Clerk contributes to the Florida Retirement System (the "System'), a cost-sharing, multiple-employer, defined benefit pension plan administered by the State of Florida, Division of Relirement. The System provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The Florida Legislature established the System under Chapter 121, Florida Statutes, and has sole authority to amend benefits provisions. Each year the System issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. The report may be obtained by writing to the Florida Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement, 2639 North Monroe Street, Building C, Tallahassee, Florida 3Z399-1560. Funding: f'olic.y- The System is non-contributory for employees and the Clerk is required per statule to pay monthly contributions at actuarially determined rates. During the fiscal year, the rate was approximately 18% of annual covered payroll. The contributions of the Clerk are established and may be amended by the State Legislahtre. The Clerk's contributions to the System for the years ending September 30, 1997, 1996, and 1995 were $907,967, S853.365, and $666,860, respectively, equal to the required contributions for each year. {4) SEI,F-IN,qURANCE PROGRAM.q: The Clerk participates in the County-wide self-insurance program. The Collier County, Florida, Board of County Commissioners maintains an internal service fund to administer self-insurance activities relating to workers' compensation, and health and life insurance. The County absorbs losses up to a specified amount annually. Excess and other specific coverages are purchased from third-party carriers. Charges to operating departments are based upon amounts believed by the Board's management to meet the required annual payouts during the fiscal year and to pay for the estimated operating costs of the program. For fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, the Clerk was charged approximately $303,449 for these programs. {5) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN: an agreement with Public Employees Benefit Service Corporation (PEBSCO) and ICMA Retirement Under Corporation, the Clerk offers employees a deferred compensation plan created in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code, Section 457. The plan is available to all Clerk employees and Permits them to defer a potion of their salaries until future years. The deferred compensation is not available to until emp~oyc~ns termination, retirement, death, or unforeseeable emergency. All amounts of compensation deferred under the plan, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, property or rights, are (until paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the Clerk (without being restricted to the provision of benefits under the plan), subject only to the claims of the Clerk's general creditors. Participants' rights under the plan are equal to those of general creditors of the Clerk of the Court in an amount equal to the fair market value of the deferred account for each participant. Assets of the deferred compensation plan is recorded at fair value and are accounted for in an agency fund. In the opinion of management, the Clerk has no liability for losses under the plan, but must exercise due care as would be expected of an ordinary prudent investor. The Clerk believes that it is unlikely that it will use the assets to satisfy the claims of general creditors in the future. (6) GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT: The following changes in general long-term debt occurred during the year ended September 30, I997: Long-term debt payable at October 1, 1996 $ 400,973 Decrease in accrued compensated absences (65,670) Long-term debt payable at September 30, 1997 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COMBINING BALANCE SHEET- FIDUCIARY FUND TYPE .SEPTEMBER 30,1997 Expendable Trust Agency Total ASSETS AND OT,,ER DEBIT Cash and investments $ 40,841 $ 4,968,206 $ 5,009,047 Investments with trustee 1~383~515 i,383,515 Total assets and other debit ~ LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUFrY LIABILITIES: Vouchers payable $ 11,186 $ 7,470 $ 18,656 Due to the Board of County Commissioners 398,298 398,298 Due to other governments 1,522,343 1.522,343 Deferred compensation payable 1,383.515 1,383.515 Deposits 3,040,095 _ 3,040,095 Total liabili ties 1 !,186 6,351,721 6,362,907 FUND EQUITY: Fund balances - unreserved, undesignated .... 29,655 .. 29,655 Total liabilities and fund equity $ 40.841 .1 COLLIER, COUNTY, FLORIDA CI.ERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT STATEMEN'r OF CIIANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - AGENCY FUND FOR Tile FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Balance Balance October 1, September 30, Account 1996 Additions Deletions 19o7 Cash and investments $4,109,597 $ 61,244,771 $ (60,386,162) $4,968,206 lnvestmenLs with trustee 1,213, I65 287,540 (117,]90) 1,383,515 Due from the Board of County Commissioners 58.243 (58,243) Due from other governments 4,478 , (4t478) Vouchers Payable $ 22.335 $ 46,268,282 $ (46.283,14/-) $ 7,470 Due to the Board of County Cumin issioners 44,178 4,495,629 (4,141,509) 398,298 Due to other constitutional officers - 10,.500 (10,500) Due to other governments 887,813 39,243,556 (38,609,026) 1,522.343 Deferred compensation payable 1.213.165 287,.540 (117,190) 1.383,515 Deposits 3.2 i 7.992 17,673.915 ,,llii,l.r II III1! IIIIIIIIllll ........ Iii .............................................. ~il~ III REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS AP THUR ANDEr $EN LLP PORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS To tJ~e ~ ~,..~ :: ,~'.. lc Dwight E. Brock Clerk t~ t:',,- ,Circuit Court We h,a ,~: ..:' ! t!~e financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Clerk of the Circuit Court (the k Clef "). :: : .,~d for the year ended September30, 1997, and have issued our report thereon dated Nove~!~.: ' , ~"77. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and th,: ~:~:~.'. ~:ds applicable to financial audits contained in Government Audih'ng Standards (1994 Revisio~), . .: ..... : by the Co~nptroller General of Lhe United States. As par,, ~ t' ~', ~ ~ting reasonable assurance about whether the Clerk's financial statements are free of materi,~l t,~.... ~.m~ent, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracL,; at~..~ !'trots, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determ ir::,'.i ,:., ,:~' financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisJot~,,~ ~....~. :~c~t an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results or' ~,~r tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Govern m e n ! A ~ ,' d :'t ~'t~ g Standards. Internal C<~!~ttol Over Financial Reporting In planni~i; ,:t',~t ;,~rforming our audit, we considered the Clerk's internal controls over financial reporting in order tc~ d. vt~:r:~ine our audilfing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the finandal statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration or' the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the intern,at cc,nifo] over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatb.,ely Iow level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the fmoncial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned funcUons. We noted no matters involving the internal ccm!rol over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, we nuted other matters involving the internal control over financial reporting that we have reported to management of the Clerk in a separate letter dated November 26, 1997. This report is intended for the information of the management of the Clerk and the Auditor General for the State of Florida. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. LLP Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 26, 1997. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT MANAGEMENT LETTER SEPTEMBER 30~ 1997 i ,/XtRTHUR /-iNDERSEN I MANAGEMENT LETTER PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA Artht,r Andersen l.l.l' I St~l~e 70(} l(Jfl Northeast Third Avenue For! L,mderdate FI. 33~}I - 11~,6 I To the Honorable Dwight E. Brock '~4 ~'Z3,1433 Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County, Florida: We have audited the financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Clerk of the Circuit Cott, t (the i "Clerk") for the year ended September 30, 1997 and have issued our report thereon dated November 26, 1997. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller applicable to financial audits contained General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The purpose of this letter is to comment on those matters described in Rule 10.554(1)(e) as required by the Rules of the Auditor Gener.al fo.r the State of Florida. Accordingly, in connection with our audit of the financial statemenB of the Clerk, as described in the first paragraph, we report the following: A. CUR REN~. YEAR: RECOMMENDA'~IONS I Improving Reporting Financial The Clerk can not automatically generate financial statements from its general ledger. Instead I cumbersome manual computations are made to combine different cost centers in order to develop financial statements at the fund type level. Management should considers the impact of this limitation when replacing its current accounting system. I ImplicatiOns of the "Year 2000" Software Issue i As the next century approaches, there is growing concern about data processing difficulties being created by date codings of transactions for years after 1999. For example, some computer systems will read only the last two digits of the year 2000 and interpret the date as 1900; others may not recognize the value and display an input error message, and some may crash. We are aware that the Clerk's Office is in the IIprocess of making their applications year 2000 compliant but would like to emphasize the importance of this conversion. II The greatest risk tends to be with customized mainframe programs, including new ones. Standard packages, software covered by maintenance contracts and microcomputer programs generally involve less risk, but they may also have shortcomings. Programs, data files, system interfaces, electronic and II written report~, networks and hardware can cause problems for functions that use or calculate dates, times and ages. Upgrading will involve, in many cases, the replacement of systems and/or extensive reprogramming. _1~l~ - 12 - ,A RTHUR 6 /ANDERSEN 4. No violations of laws, roles, regulations and contractual provisions were discovered within the scope of the financial audit that may or may not have materially affected the financial statements. 5.No illegal or improper expenditures were discovered wit. Mn the scope of the audit may or may not materially affected the financial statements. that have 6. No matters requia'ing correction (as defined by Rules of the Auditor General 10.534111[e17.) that did or did not materially affect the financial statements were noted. 7. The Clerk as an elected cortsfitutional officer and county agency, is considered a part of Collier County, Florida (primary government). As such, the Clerk's financial statements are included in the general purpose financial statements of Collier Counb,.. 8. The Clerk complied with Section 28.24(15)(d), Florida Stat'utes regarding the collection and use of Public Records' Moderni2ation Trust Fund monies. This report is intended solely for the istformation of the management of the Clerk and the Auditor General for the State of Florida. However, fi'tis report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 26, 1997. November County of Collier 6 ~ ~ CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLUER COUNTY COURTHOUS[ 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 41,1044 NAPLES. FtOmO~ 34tohoo,s4 CiRCUiT COURT COUNTY COURT Dwight E. Brock COUNTY RECORDER Clerk CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Fcbru_~q- $, 1998 Cy"nthia D. Borders-Byrd C/O Arthur Andersen LLP 100 Northeast Third Ave. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, F1 33301 HE: ~JLEHK OF COURTS - AUDI]' AS OF SEPTEMBEi-i 1997 RESPONSE TO THE MANAGEMENT LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 26, 1997 REGARDING CURRENT YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS. A. Improving Financial Reporting It is agreed that the clerk's bookkeeping department has not had the capability in the past to generate financial statements without excessive manual computations due to the outdated equipment and programs available to them. This is scheduled to change. With the final phase of our office automation project coming to a close, the ability to download data from general ledger and generate summary reports at a fund and cost center level will become a reality. B. Implications of the "Year 2000" The Clerk's agency fully understands the importance Df the year 2000 issue. Steps are being taken to assure~that ~o, efficiencies are lost during the millenium change. C. Electric Data Processing Audits As discussed at the exit conference, the Clerk's Intemal Audit Department will review and determine whether all Clerk systems are operating efficiently and are appropriately controlled. EDP audits of controls over IS processing will be further reviewed by MIS and Internal Audit. I would also like to comment on how well everyone worked together during this year and as a result of this we were able to complete a very efficient and smoothly run audit. Fiscal Supervisor Clerk's Bookkeeping Dept. m COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPERTY APPRAISER FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 TOGETHER WITH REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS COLLIER COUNTYt FLORIDA PROPERTY APPRAISER FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups 2 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance- General Fund 3 Statement olr Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - 4 Budget and Actual - General Fund Notes to Financial Statements 5 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Statement o£ Changes in Assets and Liabilities- Agency Fund 9 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS 10 MANAGEMENT LETTER 11 [ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LL? I i i REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNrTANTS i To the Honorable Abe Skinner Property Appraiser II Collier County, Florida: We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Property Appraiser (the "Property Appraiser"), as of and for the year ended September 30, 1997, as listed in the Table of Contents. These financial statements and supplementary information referred to below are the responsib//ity of the Property Appraiser's management_ Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary information based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Gover,~ment Auditing Standards (1994 Revision), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of mater/al misstatement An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accountSng principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the Property Appraiser and are not intended to present fairly the financial position of Collier County, and the results of its operations and the cash flows of it~ proprietary fund types in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Property Appraiser as of September 30, 1997, and the results of its operations for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report, dated November 7, 1997, on our consideration of the Property Appraiser's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements of the Property Appraiser taken as a whole. The supplementary information included on page 9 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 7, 1997. -1- GENERAL FUND II FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Charges for services $ 2,789,927 Miscellaneous 332,020 Ii Total revenues 3,121,947 EX?ENDITUR -ES: General government: Personal services Operating expenditures 429,981 Capital ouUay 342,906 I! Total expenditures 2,950,015 Excess of revenues over expenditures 1TI,932_ II OTHER FINANCING USES: Return of excess fees to other governments (17,305) Operating transfers out (154,627) 11 Total other financing uses (171,932) Excess of revenues over expenditures and other financing uses FUND BALANCE - October 1, 1996 FUND BALANCE - September 30, 1997 $ The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. -3- COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPERTY APPRAISER STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND B~ALANCE- BUDGET AND AC'I'UAL- GENERAL FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997_ F~'¢orable Budget Actual (U:ffavora biG) Charges for services $ 2.789.927 S 2.789.927 $ Miscellaneous 332,02___Q 332,020 Total revenues 2.789.927 3.121.947 332.020 EXPENDITURES: General government: Personal services 2.332.187 2.177..128 155.059 Operating expenditures 452.740 429.98.1 22.759 Capital outlay 5.000 342.906 (337.906) Debt service- Principal retirement Interest ' - Excess of revenues over exp,enditures 171,932 17'1,932 OTHER FINANCING USES: Return or' excess fees to other governments (17,305) (17,305) Operating transfers out (154,6273 _ (ZS4,62_Z7) Total other financing uses ' (~ 71,93...) 071,932) Excess of revenues over expenditures and other financing uses FUND BALANCE - October 1, 1996 FUND BALANCE - September 30, .1997 Ihe accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA NOTES TO FINANCIAl. STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30~ 1997 Il) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIEq: The following ks a summary of the more significant accounting principles and policies: ~a) Defining the Governmental Reporting Entity- The Property Appraiser, as an elected constitutional officer and county agency, is considered a part of Collier Coun,'-y, Florida (primary government). As such, the Property Appraiser's financial statements are included in the ger. eral purpose financial statements of Collier County (the "County"). Based on the criteria established by GASB 14, there are no component units included in the Property Appraiser's financial statements. (b) Fund Accounting- ]'he accounts of the Property Appraiser are organized on the basis of funds and an account group, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund and account group are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures. Government resources are allocated to, and accounted for in individual funds, based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. The following fund ,types and account group are used by the Property Appraiser: Governmental Fund Type General Fund - The General Fund is used to account for financial ~ansactions appIicable to the general operatSons of the Property Appraiser which are not required to be accounted for in another fund. Fiduciary Fund Type :\gencv Fund - The Agency Fund is used to account for assets held as an agent for individuals. 6 Account Croup General Long-Term Debt - This self-balancing account group i.s used to account for the long-term portion of compensated absences. {c) Measurement Focus- Governmental Fund Type -The General Fund ks accounted for on a "spending" or "financial flow" measurement focus. Only current assets and current liabilities are included on the balance sheet. Accordingly, any reported undesignated fund balance (net current assets) is considered a measure of available, spendable or appropriable resources. Governmental Fund type operating statements present increases (revenues and other financing sources) anti decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. Fiduciary Fund Type - The Agency Fund is custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and dna-;, not involve the measurement of results of operations. Account Group - ]-he General Long-Term Debt Account Group is concerned only with the measurement of financial position. It is not involved with the measurement of results of operations. Long-term debts, which are not intended to be financed through Fiduciary Funds, are accounted for in the General Long- Term Debt Account Group. (ti) Basis of Accounting- Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Basis of accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. The modified accrual basis of accounting is followed by the General Fund. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting revenues are recorded when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Available means collectible within the current period or soon thereafter, generally 60 days, subsequent to year-end. Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred, if' measurable, except for unmatured interest on general long-term debt, which is recognized when due. {e) Budgeta_ry Process- Chapter 195, Florida Statutes, governs the preparation, adoption and amendment process of the Property Apprai,ser's annual budget.. The Property Appraiser's budget and amendments are prepared independently of the Board of County Commissioners and are approved by the Florida State Department of Revenue, A copy of the approved budget is provided to the Board of County Commissioners. The budget for the General Fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis. The level of control for appropriations is exercised at the fund level. (f) Fixed Assets- Acquisitions of tangible personal property are recorded as expenditures in the General Fund at the time of purchase. These assets are reported to the Collier County, Florida, Board of County Commissioners and are recorded in the County's General Fixed Assets Account Group. -6- (~) Compensated Absences- It is the Property Appraiser's policy to allow employees to accumulate an unlimited number of hours of unused sick leave and up to 240 hours of unused vacation leave, termination, Upon em ployt~,.s are vested in a portion of the unused sick leave based upon length of service. All employees are vested in 100% of allowable accumulated vacation hours. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, the liability relating to the estimated vested amount of such unused sick leave and the full amoun: of the allowable accumulated vacation leave, plus applicable fringe benefits, are recorded in the accompanying financial statements. Because the amount of accrued compensated absences would not normally be liquidated with expendable available resources, it is recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group. (h) Total Column on Combined Balance Sheet- sheet is captioned "Memorandum Only" to indicate that ;t is The total column on the combLned balance presented only to facilitate financial analysis. Data in this column does not present financial position or results of operahons in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Neither is such data comparable to a consolidation. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. 12)CASH AND INVESTMENTS: Deposits- At September 30, 1997, the amount of the Prolm_,rty Appraiser's deposits with financial institutions was deposits were entirely covered by federal depository insurance or by collateral pursuant $581,549. These to the Florida Security for Public Deposits Act (Florida Statutes Chapter 280). At September 30, 1997, the investments with trustee totaled $805,598, which equals its market value. These investments are deferred compensation plan assets which are invested in mutual fund pools (commercial paper and bankers' acceptances) and are not specifically identified or segregated in the Property Appraiser's name and, therefore, are not categorized to give the level of risk assumed at year- end. This amount is not required to be categorized pursuant to GASB Statement Number 3, "Deposits with Financial Institutions, Investments (including Repurchase Agreements) and Reverse Repurchase AgreemenLs," because it is not represented by underlying securities in either physical or book entry form. (3) RETIREMENT PLAN: The Property Appraiser early implemented the provisions of GASB 27, for Accounting Pertsions by State and Local Government Employers, in the fotlowing disclosure. Plan Description- The Property Appraiser contributes to the Florida Retirement System (the "System"), a cost-sharing, mult/ple-employer, defined benefit pension plan admini.-.tered by the State of Florida, Division of Retirement. The System provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments. and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The Florida Legislature established the System under Chapter 121, Florida Statutes, and has sole authority to amend benefits provisimts. Each year the System issues a publicly available financial that report includes financial statements and required supplementary information. The report may be obtained by writing to the Florida Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement, 2639 North Monroe Street, Building C, Tallahassee, Florida 3239%1560. -7- Funding Policy- The System is non-contributory for employees and the Property Appraiser is required per statute to pay monthly contributions at actuarially determined rates. During the fiscal year, the rate was approximately 18% of annual covered payroll. The conl:ributions of the Property Appraiser are established and may be amended by the State Legislature. The Property Appraiser's contributions to the System for the years ending September 30, 1997, 1996, and 1995 were $295,633, $289,232, and $272,066, respectively, equal to the required contributions for each year. [4) SELF-INSURANCE PROGRAMS: The Property Appraiser participates in the County-wide self-insurance program. The Cotlier Coun,"y, Florida, Board of County Commissioners maintains an internal service fund to administer self-insurar;ce activities relating to workers' compensation and health and life insurance. The County absorbs los~,e.~; up to a specified amount annually. Excess and other specific coverages are purchased from third-party carriers. Charges to operating departments are based upon amounts believed by the Board of County Commissioners' management to meet the required annual payouts during the fiscal year and to pay for the estimated operating costs of the program. For fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, the Property Appraiser was charged approximately $88,377 for these programs. (5) DEF'ERRED COMPENSATION PLAN: The Property Appraiser offers employees deferred compensation plans (through two providers) created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code, Section 457. The plans are available to ail Property Appraiser employees and permit them to defer a portion of their salaries unl~ future years. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death or unforeseeable emergency,. All amounts of compensation deferred under the plans, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, property or rights, are (until paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the Property Appraiser (without being restricted to the provision of benefits under the plans), subject only to the claims of the Property Appraiser's general creditors. Participants' rights under the plans are equal to those of general creditors of the Property Appraiser in an amount equal to the fair market value of the deferred account for each participant. The Property Appraiser believes that it is unlikely that it will use the assets to satisfy the claims of general creditors in the future. [6) GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT: The following changes in general long-term debt occurred during the year ended September 30, 1997: Long-term debt payable at October 1, 1996 $ 249,690 Increase in accrued compensated absences 21,148 Long-term debt payable at September 30, 1997 .$.. 270.855 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPERTY APPRAISER il STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - AGENCY FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Balance Balanco Employee Deferred October 1, Septembt, r 30, Compensation Plan Fund 1996 Additions Deletions 1997 ASSETS 1 Investments with trustee .$_~55L74._l $ 167,840 ~ $ 805,59~ Deferred compensation payable $_.658..741 $ 16,7.~0 $ _ (_20.959) $, 805.595 Ii -9- ~-~'[ ........... ][[[[ .... Illl- -]ill Il Il .................. i ................ :~-'~ ........ I ] I I [ I! II REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS ! I I ! AIC HUR ANDERSEN LLP 6 I REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS To the Honorable Abe Skinner ii Property Appraiser Collier County, Florida: We have audited the financial statements of the Collier County, FIorida, Property Appraiser (the "Property Appraiser"), as of and for the year ended September30, 1997, and have issued our report thereon dated November 7, 1997. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards (1994 Revision), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Property Appraiser's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an object/ye of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opm/om The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Govern men t Auditing Standards. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Property Appraiser's internal controls over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporhng. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal conh'ol components does not reduce to a relahvely Iow level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operat/on that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, we noted other matters involving the internal control over financial reporting that we have reported to management of the Property Appraiser in a separate letter dated November 7, 1997. This report is intended for the information of the management of the Property Appraiser and the Auditor General for the State of Florida. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 7, 1997. -10- PROPERTY APPRAISER MANAGEMENT LETTER FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30f 1997 AARTHUR a NDERSEN MANAGEMENT LE'TTER PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA S L:t t,..' 7(NI To ~e Honorable A~ Skinner uT,.l -~'~., 4J~3 Proper~ Appraher Collier Count, Florida: We have audited the financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Property Appraiser. (the "Property Appraiser") for the year ended September 30, 1997 and have issued our report thereon dated November 7, 1997. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material miss~tement. The purpose of this letter is to comment on those matters described in Rule 10.554(1)(e) as required by the Rules of the Auditor General for the State of Florida. Accordingly, in connection with our audit of the financial statements of the Property Appraiser, as described in the first paragraph, we report the following: A. CURRENT YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS Consistent with the prior year, there are no material weaknesses in financial management controls at the Property Appraiser. However, opportunities will continue to'arise to improve existing practices. Accordingly, the following recommendations to improve financial management, the Property Appraiser's accounting procedures and internal control structure were developed during the September30, 1997 audit. General Ledger Coding of Vouchers The Property Appraiser does not code vouchers for general ledger accounts. We recommend that general ledger accounts be placed on each voucher to prevent errors from occurring and also to provide an audit trail. Time and Attendance Presently employees record their time on bi-weekly timecards. These timecards are reviewed and approved by the immediate supervisor and submitted to accounting at the end of the pay period. Additionally, every time an employee takes time off, a leave sheet is filled-out and approved by the supervisor, then turned-in to accounting. The Property Appraiser should consider eliminating leave sheets and incorporate time off into the bi-weekly time cards. This would reduce unnecessary paperwork and expedite the process of payroll preparation. -11- /ANDERSEN l! ^ARTHUR B. PRIOR YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS All prior )'ear comments have been implemented and have not been in this repeated section. C. OTHER MATTERS In connection with our audit of the financial statements of the Property Appraiser, we report the following matters described in Rule 10.55,1(1)(e) as required by the Rules of the Auditor General for the State of Florida: 1. No inaccuracies, irregularities, shortages, defalcat/ons, and/or violations of laws, rules, regulaLions, and contractual provisions were reported in the preceding annual financial audit. 2. The Property Appraiser is from the annual financial exempt filing report with the Department of Banking and Finance pursuant to Sechon 218.32(1)(a) because it is a reporting entity of Collier County (primary government). 3. The Property Appraiser is not and was not during the fiscal year in a state of financial as a emergency consequence of conditions described in Section 218.503(1), Florida Statutes. 4. No violat/ons of laws, roles, regulations and contractual provisions were discovered within the scope of the financial audit that may or may not have materially affected the financial statements. 5. No illegal or improper expenditures were discovered within the scope of the audit that may or may not have materially affected the financial statements. 6.No matters requiring correction (as defined by Rules of the Auditor General 10.554[1][e]7.) that did or did not materially affect the financial statements noted. were 7. The Property Appraiser as an elected constitutional officer and county agency, is considered a part of Collier County, Florida (primary government). As such, the Property Appraiser's financial statements .are included in the general purpose financial statements of Collier County. II This report is intended solely for the information of the management of the Property Appraiser and the Auditor General for the State of Florida. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. II Fort Lauderdale, Florida, l November 7, 1997. _Lr~ o 1,.2. COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY =APPRAI=SE~R 6 ~ ABE SKINNER' c--F~A J~,~l 2 7 ~9~ m MEMO To: Cynthia D. Borders-Bryd From: Glcnnda Roberts, Accounting Technician Subject: Management Letter Response Date: January 23, 1998 We have received your FY 96-97 year end recommendations per your Management Letter. Recommendation number one has already been implemented. Recommendation number two will be implemented and is in process. Thank you. Ii MEMBER: FL OR/DA ASSOCIA T/ON OF PROPER r'Y' APPRAISERS · INTERNATIONAL AS,,qOCIA/'ION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS 330 ! ramtam~ Da,! East · Budding C.2 · Naples. Florida 341 I2-4996 · (94 1) 774.8141 · F8~' (941) 774-207 t COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SHERIFF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 TOGETHER WITH REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS COLLIER COUNTY~ FLORIDA SHERIFF FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups 2 Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - General Fund and Expendable Trust Fund 4 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance- Budget and Actual - Gen.eral Fund 5 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings - Internal Service Fund 6 Statement of Cash Flows - Internal Service Fund 7 Notes to Financial Statements 8 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Combining Balance Sheet - Fiduciary Fund Types 14 Combined Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - All Agency Funds 15 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS 16 MANAGEMENT LE'ITER 17 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Honorable Don Hunter Sheriff Collier County, Horida: Ii We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Sheriff (the "Sheriff"), as of and for the year ended September 30, 1997 as listed in the Table of Contents. These ., financial statements and supplementary information referred to below are the responsibility ¢~ the I! Sheriff's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statement:s and supplementary information based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted audilffng standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards (1994 Revision) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the I audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements free of material ate misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting We amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounH.,ng principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. i As discussed in Note l, the financial statements present only the Sheriff and are not intended to present fairly the financial position of Collier County, and the results of its operations and the cash flows of its proprietary fund types in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above in all material present fairly, respects, ~e financial position of the Sheriff as of September 30, 1997, and the results of its operations and cash flows of its proprietary fund type for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting I principles. In accordance with Government AudiKng Standards, we have also issued our report, dated November 26, I! 1997, on our consideration of the Sheriff's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements of the Sheriff II taken as a whole. The supplementary information included on pages 14-15 are presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the finandal statements taken as a whole. L L t Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 26, 1997. m 68 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA m SHERIFF COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE GENERAL FUND AND EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Total General Special Expendable (Memorandum Fund Revenue Trust Fund Ov, ly) REVENUES: Miscellaneous $ $ 3,119,327 $ 252,359_ $ 3,371,686 EXPENDITURES: Current- General government: Personal services 952,061 952,061 Opera t4'ng expenditures 28,234 28,234 980,295 980,295 Public safety: Personal services 40,157,805 2,860,980 - 43,018,785 Operating expenditures 6,937,354 444,159 117,849 _. 7,499,362 47,095,159 3,305,139 117,849 50,518,147 Ca pital ou flay 1,845,227 450,200 - 2,295,427 Total expenditures 49,920,681 3,755,339 117,849 53,793,869 Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures (49,920,681) (636,012) 134,510 (50,422,183) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Opera ting transfers in 50,470,900 636,012 51,106,9'12 Opera ting transfers out (550,219) (550,219) Total other financing sources (uses) 49,920,681. 636,012 50,556,6920. Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses - 134,510 134,510 FUND BALANCE - October 1, 1996 - . 254,298 254,298 FUND BALANCE - .~ptember 30, 1997 The accompanying notes to financial statement~ are an integral part combined statement. COLLIER COUNTY~ FLORIDA SHERIFF STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE- BUDGET AND ACTUAL - GENERAL FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30~ 1997 Va:'iance- Favorable Budget Actual {Uafavorable) REVENUES: Miscellaneous $ - $ $ EXPENDITURES: Current- General govemmenV. Personal services 903,000 952,061 (49,061) Operahng expenditures 36fi00 28,234 7,866 939,100 980,295 . (41,195) Public safety: Personal services 40,051,200 40,157,805 (106,605) Operating expenditures 7,713,400 6,937,354 776,046 47,764,600 47,095,'159 669,441 Capital outlay 1,541,200 1,845,227 {304,027) Total expenditures 50,244,900 49,920,681 324,219 Excess of expenditu res over revenues {50,244,900) {49,920,681) 324,219 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Opera ting transfers in 50,470,900 50,470,900 Operating transfers out (226,000) (550,219) . {324,219) Total other financing sources (uses) ... 50,244,900 49,920,681 _ (324,219) Excess of expenditures and other financing uses over revenues and other financing sources - FUND BALANCE - October 1, 1996 - . FUND BALANCE- September 30, 1997 L_ - ... ~ . ._2 .... .~.~- The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part statement. of COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SHERIFF STATEMENT OF REVENUESt EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 OPERATING REVENUES: Charges for services ~; 4,201,6'18 OPERATING EXPENSES: Claims and claims expenses 2,888,650 Reinsurance premiums 231,133 Administrative and other expenses 118,481 Total operating expenses . 3~238,264 Operating income 96.3,354 NONOPERAT1NG REVENUES: Interest income 1'16,164 Net income 1,079,518 RETAINED EARNINGS- October 1, 1996 .. 2,022,181 RETAINED EARNINGS- September 30, 1997 $. 3.101.,69Q_ The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SHERIFF STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - INTERNAL SERVICE FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Cash payments for claims and claims related services $ (2,643,746) Cash payments for reinsurance premiums (231,133) Cash payments for adminish'afive services and supplies (118,481) Cash received from other funds for services 4,092,886 Cash received from retirees for services 71,826 Net cash provided by operating activities . !,171~352 CASH FLOWS FROIvl INVE~-FING ACTIVITIES: Interest on investments 116t164_ Net increase in cash 1,287,516 CASH- October l, 1996 . 2,669,367 CASH - September 30, 1997 RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Operating income $ 963,354 Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities- Increase in accounts receivable (36,906) Increase in accounts payable 46,904 Increase in serf-insurance claims payable 198,0(30 Net cash provided by operating activities $__.~7~5_2, The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. COLLIER COUNTY~ FLORIDA SHERIFF NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS S E rTEM B ER_.~.0.,_19~7 (1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POI,ICIF. q: The following is a summary of the significant accounting principles and policies: (a)..Defining the Governmental Reporting Entity The Sheriff, as an elected constitutional officer and county agency, is considered a part of Collier County, Florida (primary government). As such, the Sheriff's financial statements are included in the financial statements of Collier County (the "County"). These financial statements are intended to present only the operations of the Sheriff and not those of the County overall. Based on the criteria es~b[ished by (SASB 14, there are no component units included in the Sheriff's financial statements. (b) Fund Accounting The accounts of the Sheriff are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for using a separate set of self-balancing accounts which comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate. Government resources are allocated to, and accounted for in individual funds, based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. The following funds and account groups are used by the Sheriff: Governr..en!al Fund Type General Fund -- The General Fund is used to account for all financial transactions applicable to 0~e general operations of the Sheriff which are not required to be accounted for in another fund. ~pecial Revenue Fund - The Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted by legal requirements, regulatory provisions or administrative action. Proprietary Fund Type Internal Service Fund - The Internal Service Fund is used to account for the financing of a self-insured employee health plan. Fiduciary Fund Types Trust and Agency Funds - Trust anti Agency Funds are used to account for asset~ held by public officials in a trustee capacity or as an agent for individuals, private organizations, other governments and/or other funds. These funds include an Expendable Trust Fund and Agency Funds. i -8- ~, . - .... [u[[ [[ nil[ii n [ II I I ...... [I II ...... - .......................... -I' .... ]][ ! 6-B - Account Groups General Fixed Assets - This account group is used to account for tangible fixed assets which have an estimated useful life in excess of one year. General Long-Term Debt - This account group is used to account for the principal amounts of general long-term indebtedness, as well as compensated absences. (c) Measurement Focus Governmental Fund Type - The General and Special Revenue Funds are accounted for on a "spending" or 'financial flow" measurement focus. This means that only current assets and cu~ent liabilities art: included on the balance sheet. Accordingly, any reported undesignated fund balance (net current asse~) is considered a measure of available, spendable or appropriable resources. Governmental Fund Type operating statements present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decrtases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. Proprietary Fund Type - The Proprietary Fund is accounted for on a cost of service measurement focus. All assets and all liabilities (current and noncurrent) are included on the balance sheet. Fiduciary Fund Types - The Expendable Trust Fund is accounted for in essentially the same manner as Governmental Funds. Agency Funds are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not invo!ve measurement of results of operations. Account Groups - The General Fixed Assets Account Group and the General Long-Term Debt Account Group are concerned only with the measurement of financial position. They are not involved with the operations, assets, are not used in Fiduciary Fund operations, are measurement of of FLxed which accounted for in the General Fixed Asset Account Group. Long-term debts, which are not intended to be financed through Fiduciary Funds, are accounted for in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group. (d) Basis of Accounting Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures or expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Basis of accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. modified accrual basis of accounting is followed by the Government Fund Type and Fiduciary Fund The Types. Under this basis, revenues are recorded when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Available means collectible within the current period or soon thereafter, generally 60 days, subsequent to year-end. Expenditures are generally under the recognized modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred. Exceptions to this general rule include: (1) principal and interest on general long-term debt, which is recognized when due; and (2) expenditures that are not divided between years by tF, e recording of prepaid expen.ses. ?roprietary Funds use the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized in the period that they are earned and expenses are recognized in the period incurred. {e) Budgetary Process Chapter 30, Florida Statutes, governs the preparation, adoption and administration process of the Sheriff's annual budget. A budget is only required to be prepared for the General Fund. The Sheriff's budget and amendments are approved by the Board of County Commissioners (the "Board"). The budget for the General Fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis, except that principal and interest payments are operating expenditures. budgeted as The annual budget serves as the legal authorization for expenditures. Expenditures cannot legally exceed the total amount budgeted for that fund. Ali budget amendments, which change the legally adopted total appropriation for a fund, are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The level of control for appropriations is exercised at the fund level. (~ Encumbrances Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts and other commitments for the expenditure are to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation, is used of funds recorded in order in the General Fund. All encumbrances lapse at year-end. Therefore, encumbrances are not compared to authorized appropriations and no portion of fund balance is reserved. (g) General Fixed Assets Acquisitions of tangible personal property are recorded as capital outlay at the time of purchase. All fixed assets are valued at historical cost or estimated historical cost if actual historical costs are not available. Donated fixed assets are valued at their estimated fair value on the date donated. No depreciation has been provided on general fixed assets. (h) Compensated Absences The Sheriff's employees accumulate annual sick and vacation leave based on the number of of years continuous service. In addition, the Sheriff's employees accumulate compensator,/ hours. Upon termination of employment, employees receive payment for 100% of accumulated vacation leave and compensatory time earned, and up to 35% of 1,000 hours of accumulated sick leave, depending on length of service. Accrued compensated absences are recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group because the liability will not be liquidated with available spendable resources at the balance sheet date. {i) Total Column on Combined Financial Statements The total column on the combined financial statements is captioned "Memorandum Only' to indicate that it is presented only to facihtate financial analysis. Data in this column does not financial present position or result~ of operations in conformity with generaIly accepted accounting principles. Neither is such data comparable to a consolidation. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. (2) CASH AND INVESTMENTS: Florida Statutes and the Sheriff's Investment Policy authorize investments in certificates of deposit, savings accounts, repurchase agreements, the Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund administered by the Florida State Board of Administration, obligations of the U.S. Government and governmer, t agencies unconditionally gqaaranteed by the U.S. Government. Certificates of deposit, savings accounts and bank balances whose values exceed the amount of federal depository insurance are collateralLzed pursuant to the Florida Security for Public Deposits Act (Florida Statutes Chapter 280). Included in the balance of cash and investments is an investment with the State of Florida's Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund with a carrying and market value of $709,497. In addition, the investments with trustees (investment in mutual funds for the deferred compensation plan) totaled $2,709,505 which equaled their market value. These amounts are not categorized pu.,'-.~uant to GASB Statement Number 3, 'Deposits with Financial Institutions, Investments (including Repur,:hase Agreements) and Reverse Repurchase Agreements,' because they are not represented by undel]ying securities in either physical or book form. entl'y 13) RETIREMENT PLAN: The Sheriff early implemented the provisions of GASB 27, Accounting for Pensions by State and Local Government Employers, in the following disclosure. Plan Description- The Sheriff contributes to the Florida Retirement System (the "System"), a cost-sharing, multiple- employer, defined benefit pension plan administered by the State of Florida, Division of Retirement. The System provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefit~; to plan members and beneficiaries. The Florida Legislature established the System under Chapter 121, Florida Statutes, and has sole authority to amend benefits provisions. Each year the System issues a publicly available financial report that includes finandal statements and required supplementary information. The report may be obtained by writing to the Florida Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement, 2639 North Monroe Street, Building C, Tallahassee, Florida 323~)-1560. Funding Policy- The is for and the Sheriff is statute to monthly System non-contributory employees required pcr pay contributions at actuarially determined rates. During the fiscal year, the rate was approximately 26% of annual covered payro{l. '[']ne contributions of the Sheriff are established and may be amended by the State Legislature. The Sheriff's contributions to the System for the years ending September 30, 1997, 1996, and 1995 were $7,378,508, $6,317,431, and $5,586,913, respectively, equal to the required contributions for each year. (4) SELF-INSURANCE PROGRAM: The Sheriff's Office participates in the State-wide Florida Sheriffs' Self-Insurance Fund (t. he "Fund") for its professiona[ liability insurance. The Fund is managed by representatives of the participating Sheriff offices and provides professional liability insurance to participating agencies. The Fund provides liability insurance coverage subject to the following limitations: $2,100,000 for any claim involving a single individual, $2,200,000 for incident which involves multiple claims and an of $2,300,000 any aggregate ultimate net loss per Sheriff during any policy period. Effective January 1, 1994, the Sheriff elected to participate in the Florida Sheriffs' Self-Insurance Fund programs for workers' compensation coverage. The Florida Sheriffs' Association Workers' Compensation Insurance Trust (FSAWFF) is a limited self-insurance fund providing coverage for the first 5300,000 of every claim. Re-insurance is provided through a third-party insurer for all claims exceeding $300,000 up to 52,000,000. Prior to this date, the Sheriff's Office was a participant in the county-wide self-insurance internal service fund maintained by the Board to administer these insurance activities. Premiums charged to participating Sheriffs are based upon amounts believed by the Fund management to meet the required annual payout during the fiscal year and to pay for the estimated operating costs of the program. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, the Sheriff was charged $1,155,370 for the workers' compensation self-insurance program. Coverage is provided on an occurrence basis. Also effective January 1, 1994, the Sheriff established a self-~undec~ employee health plan. An Internal Service Fund was established to account for the activities of ff,e plan. Excess coverage has been purchased which provides specific claim excess coverage fo~- ?.'-.y one incident exceeding 5125,~,00 to $1,000,000 and aggregate limits excess coverage for total claims paid by the Sheriff, which e>:ceeds any coverage year. $3,742,989 for Changes in the balance of estimated insurance claims payable for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1996 and 1997 follow: New Claims Balance and Changes Claim Balance October 1, in Estimates Payments September 30, Fiscal Year Ending: '1996 $ 502,000 $ 2,842,928 $(2,705,928) $ 639,000 1997 639,000 2,841,746 (2,643,746) 837,000 15) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN: The Sheriff offers employees deferred compensation plans (through various providers) created in accordance with the Internal Revenue Service Code, Section 457. The plans, available to all Sheriff employees, permit them to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death or unforeseeable emergency. Alt amounts of compensation deferred under the plans, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, proper.b/ or rights, are (until paid or made avaLlable to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the Sheriff (without being restricted to the provisions of benefits under the plan), subject only to the claims of the Sheriffs general creditors. Participants' rights under the plans are equal to those of creditors of the Sheriff general an amount equal to the fair value of the deferred account for each participant. Assets of the deferred compensation plans are recorded at fair value and are accounted for in an agency fund. In the opinion of management, the Sheriff has no liability for losses under the plans, but must exercise due care as would be expected of an ordinary prudent investor. The Sheriff believes that it i.s unlikely that it will use the assets to satisfy the claims of general creditors in the future. [6) GENERAL FIXED ASSETS: The following changes in general fLxed assets occurred during the year ended September 30, 1997; Balance Balance October 1, September 30, 1996 Additions Deletions 1997 Machinery and equipment 17') GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT: The general long-term debt is comprised of compensated absences. The following changes in general long-term debt occurred during the year ended September 30, 1997: Long-term debt payable at October 1, 1996 $ 3,890,181 Net decrease in accrued compensated absences {131,138) Long-term debt payable at September 30, 1997 $ 3.759,04.3. {8) INTERFUND RECEWABLES (DUE FROM) AND PAYABLES (DUE TO): Amounts due from and due to other funds at September 30, 1997 are as follows: Due from Due to Other Funds Other Funds General Fund $ 404,942 $ 514 Special Revenue 392,751 Agency 514 5,775 Expendable Trust 276 6,692 $ 405.7 $. 40[~. ! I COLLIER COUNTY~ FLORIDA SHERIFF COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - FIDUCIARY FUND TYPE5 SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Expendable Agency Trust Total ASSETS: Cash $ 80,181 $ 395,224 $ 475,405 Investments with trustees 2,709,505 2,709,505 Due from other funds 514 276 790 Total assets LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY: LIABILITIES Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 47,715 $ $ 47,715 Due to other funds 5,775 6,692 12,467 Due to Board of County Commissioners 27,205 27,205 Deferred compensation payable 2,709,505 . 2 709 505 Total liabilit/es 2,790,200 _ 6,692 2,7~ FUND EQUITY Fund balances - unreserved - 388,808 .. 388,808 Total liabilities and fund equity $ 2,790.20(2 $ ~9~5.500 ~_3:.18_~70.Q I COLLIER COUNTYe FLORIDA SHERIFF COMBINED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ALL AGENCY FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30~ 1997 Balance Balance October 1, September 30, 1996 Additions Deletions 1997 TOTAL - ALL AGENCY FUNDS ASSETS: Cash $ 103,896 $ 2,900,731 $(2,924,446) $ 80,181 Investments with trustees 1,845,879 1,071,518 (207,892) 2,709,505 Due from other funds 1,605 514 (1,605) 514 Total assets LIA BIISTIES: Accounts payable $ 59,414 $ 514,865 $ (526,564) $ 47,715 Due to other funds 19,062 275 (13,562) 5,775 Due to Board of County Commissioners 27,025 317,431 (317,251) 27,205 Deferred compensation payable 1,845,879 1,071,518 (207,892) _. 2,709,505 Total liabilities ~;_L, _9_~J .,~,a~30 $ 'i:9~_~ _~_ L,.Q.6_~269) ~2,7c)0~2_~._~ REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP 6 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS To the Honorable Don Hunter Sheriff Collier County, Florida: We have audited the financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Sheriff (the "Sheriff"), as of and for the year ended September 30, 1907, and have issued our report thereon dated November 26, 1997. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and tile standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards (1994 Revi.~.ion), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Sheriff's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tes~ of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effe,.-t on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Sheriff's internal controls over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, we noted other matters involving the internal control over financial reporting that we have reported to management of the Sheriff in a separate letter dated November 26, 1997. This report is intended for the information of the management of the Sheriff and the Auditor General for the State of Florida. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 26, 1997. SHERIFF MANAGEMENT LETI'ER FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 ,ARTHUR /-kNDERSEN MANAGEMENT LETFER PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF AH--I~ur Andersen l.l.l' THE AUDITOR GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA I00 Norlheas! ll~ird Avenue Forl l.auderdale Fl..1.1.1t11. l lbt~ 95.t 523.1433 To the Honorable Don Hunter Sheriff Collier County, Florida: We have audited the financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Sheriff, (the "Sheriff") for the year ended September 30, 1997 and have issued our report thereon dated November 26, 1997. generally accepted auditix~g standards and the standards We conducted our audit accordance with for financial audits contained in Go~ernment Audih'ng Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasov, able assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The purpose of this letter is to comment on those matters described in Rule 10.554(1)(e) as required by the Rules of the Auditor General for the State of Florida. Accordingly, in connection with our audit of the financial statements of the Sheriff, as described in the first paragraph, we report the following: A. CURRENT YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS Electronic Data Processing Audits The Sheriff's staff does not perform a periodic independent evaluation of the internal control system relating to information systems. Although a limited, high-level review of information systems is performed in connection with the annual external audit, the objectives of this review are not to determine whether all Sheriff systems are operating efficiently and effectively and are appropriately controlled. EDP audits of controls over IS processing should be performed on a regular basis to enable prevention and early detection of errors or irregularities in processing both financial and non- financial data. An EDP audit function within the Sheriff's Office could perform objective and thorough independent reviews of information systems resulting in improvements in ail functional areas of the organization's information systems environment and provide assurance that proper management control over systems are conscientiously maintained. The Sheriff should consider hiring an experienced EDP auditor to perform systems reviews or use externally contracted EDP audit consultants to perform regular EDP reviews on behaff of the Sheriff's Office. ARTHUR .,ANDERSEN Disaster Recovery Plan The Sheriff has a partial disaster recovery plan in place. However, the plan does not make provisior,s for alternate processing in case of a disaster. Management should consider the impact of such limitation on the current disaster recovery plan. Automate The Bond System The Corrections Division currently issues and tracks bonds manually. These bonds are manually Listed on a transmittal log by Finance. The Corrections Division should continue to issue such bonds sequentially and Finance should account for all issued, unissued and voided bonds. Automatinc' this system would further improve the internal conla'ols and operating efficiency and effectiveness ~;'f the process. _Improving Financial Reporting The Sheriffls Office can not automatically financial generate statements from its general ledger. Instead cumbersome manual computations are made to combine different cost centers in order to develop financial statements at the fund type level. Additionally, the Sheriff's Office manually records activities relating to its agency fund which is used to account for deferred compensation and does not include it in its general ledger. The agency fund should be recorded and included in the general ledger. The Sheriff's Office should consider these limitations when replacing its current accounting system. Implications of the 'Year 2000" Software Issue growing concern about data processing difficulties being the next century approaches, there created by date codings of transactions for years after 1999. For example, some computer systems will read only the last two digits of the year 2000 and interpret the date as 190G; others may not recognize the value and display an input error message, and some may crash. We are aware that the SherffPs Office is in the process of making their applications year 2000 compliant but would like to emphasize the importance of this conversion. The greatest risk tends to be with customized mainframe programs, including new ones. Standard packages, software covered by maintenance contracts and microcomputer programs generally involve less risk, but they may also have shortcomings. Programs, data files, system interfaces, electronic and written reports, networks and hardware can cause problems for functions that use or calculate dates, times and ages. Upgrading will involve, in many cases, the replacement of systems and/or extensive reprogramming. Before 2000, the greatest risks will involve forward-lt, oking in. formation, such as lease contracts, future effective insurance policies, present values, cash payment/collection schedules, deferred revenue, depreciation, long-term claim payout analyses, budgeting and forecasting. Other problems may not surface unti] the next decade, when historical data begins to include year 2000 transactions (e.g., in policy master files, aging reports, accruals and payroll). I I 6'1 I /-kNDERSEN We understand that the Sheriff's Offices has completed a technology needs assessment and has issued a joint request for proposals with the Clerk of the Circuit Court for new computer systems. The Sheriff's Office should continue its efforts to ensure that its computer systems are bally integrated and year 2000 compliant. B. PRIOR YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS Prior years recommendations have been fully implemented or are no longer applicable. C. OTHER MATTERS In connection with our audit of the financial statements of the Sheriff, we report the followLng ma~-ters described in Rule 10.554(1)(e) as required by the Rules of the Auditor General for the State of Florida: 1. No inaccuracies, irregularities, shortages, defalcations, and/or violations of laws, rules, regulations, and contractual provisions were reported in the preceding annual financial audit. 2. The Sheriff is exempt from filing the annual financial report with the Department of Banking and Finance pursuant to Section 218.32(1)(a) because it is a reporting entity of Collier County (primary government). 3. The Sheriff is not and was not during the fiscal year in a state of financial emergency as a consequence of conditions described in Section 218.503(1), Florida Statutes. 4. No violations of laws, rules, regulations and contractual provisions were discovered withLn the scope of the financial audit that may or may not have materially affected the financial statements. or improper expenditures were clkscovered within the scope of the audit that may or 5. No ~legal may not have materially affected the financial statements. 6. No matters requiring correction (as defined by Rules of the Auditor General 10.554[1][e]7.) that did or did not materially affect the financial statements were noted. 7. The Sheriff as an elected constitutional officer and county agency, is considered a part of Collier County, Florida (primary government). As such, the Sheriff's financial statemenl~ are included in the general purpose financial statements of Collier County. report is intended solely for the information of the management of the Sheriff and the Auditor This General for the State of Florida. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 26, 1997. I "[" [[' [[1 [111 Illll .......... Ill II ']1 .......... i'i[Jl I Collier County Govt. Complex Bldg. - J 3301 Tamiarni Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 Telephone (AC 941) 774-4434 COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 1997 RESPONSE TO AUDIT MJkNAGEMENT LETTER Current Year Comments and Recommendation~ 1. Electronic Data Processinq Audits Collier County Sheriff Response and Intended Action The Sheriff's Office performs a review cf information systems. We appreciate the recommendation to add an EDP auditor, however, the current budget does not provide funding for this position. The Sheriff's Office relies on the external annual audit for review beyond internal capabilities. 2. Disaster Recovery Plan Collier County Sheriff Response and Intended Action The Sheriff's Office does not have an alternate processing site in case of disaster. The Sheriff's Office is in the process of converting computer systems for the Year 2000. As a part of the conversion, alternative processing sites will be sought. 3. Automate the Bond System Collier County Sheriff Response and Intended Action The Sheriff's Office intends to automate the Bonds system during the Year 2000 computer conversion process. 4. ~mprovinq Financial Reporting Collier County Sheriff Response and Intended Action The Sheriff's Office generates automated financial statements from its General Ledger system. Unfortunately, all elements of operations are not yet automated. This requires some manual consolidation of information. During the Year 2000 conversion, we hope to automate all operations segments so that integrated financials are possible. 5. Implications of the "Year 2000" Software Issue Collier County Sheriff Response and Intended Action The Sheriff's Office is reviewing alternatives for the Year 2000 compliance. This will require complete conversion of current systems. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 TOGETHER WITH REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS COLLIER COUNVI~t FLORIDA SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups 2 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - General Fund 3 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - General Fund 4 Notes to Financial Statements 5 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS 9 MANAGENIENT LETTER 10 ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP 6 El '" ' m REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Honorable Mary Morgan Supervisor of Elections Collier County, Florida: We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Supervisor of EleclSons (the "Supervisor of Elections"), as of and for the year ended September 30, 1997, as listed in the Table of Contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Supervisor of Elections' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards (1994 Revision), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant est/mates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the Supervisor of Elections and are not intended to present fairly the financial position of Collier County, and the results of its operations and the cash flows of its proprietary fund types in conformity with generally accepted accounhng principles. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Supervisor of Elections as of September 30, 1997, and the results of its operat/ons for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance w/th Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report, dated November 7, 1997, on our consideration of the Supervisor of Elect/om' internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compIiance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 7, 1997. ....... --- ii, , i i Imm mlllm I mi ..................... - ...................... '- ~ {{ lib ............................ {1{ If COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS COMBINED BALANCE SHEET - ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Governmental Account Fund Type Group General Total Long-Term (Memora~,dum General Debt Only) ASSETS AND OTHER DEBIT Cash $ 544,804 $ $ 544,804 Amount to be provided for retirement of general long-term debt 37t987 37,987 Total assets and other debit $ 544.804 $ 37.98_7 $ 582.79'[ LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY LIABILrFIES: Vouchers payable $ 32,249 $ - $ 32,249 Due to Board of County Commissioners 512,537 - 512,537 Due to other constitutional officers 18 - 18 Accrued compensated absences 37,987 37,987 Total liabilities 544,804 37,987 582,791 FUND EQUITY: Fund balance Total liabilities and fund equity $544.804. IL_37.9.87~ $ 582,791 m The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this combined balance sheet. -2- COLLIER COUNTY~ FLORIDA SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - GENERAL FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30~ 1997 REVENUES $ . EXPENDITURES: Current- General government Personal services 692,211 Operating expenditures 199,433 Capital outlay _. 34,191 Total expenditures 925,835 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Operating transfers in 1,433,800 Operating transfers out (507,965) Total other financing sources 925,835 Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses . FUND BALANCE - October 1, 1996 FUND BALANCE - September 30, 1997 ~_ . The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. -3- I COLLIER COUNTYt FLORIDA I SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS STATEMENT OF REVENUES~ EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL- GENERAL FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 301 1997 Va fiance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES $ ~, . ~ EXPENDITURES: Current- General government: Personal services 895,200 692,211 202,989 Operating expenditures 322,700 199,433 123,267 Capital outlay 81,000 341191 46,809 Total expenditures 11298,900 925,835 373,065 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Operating t~artsfers in 1,433,800 1,433,800 - Operating transfers out {'134,900) (507,965) (373,065) Total other financing sources (uses) !,298,900 925,835 (3731065) Excess of other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses ~; - $ . FUND BALANCE - October 1, 1996 FUND BALANCE - September 30, 1997 $.. . The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. -4- I! 6 I COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA i SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (1} SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIF. q: The following is a summary of the significant accounting principles and policies: I [a) Defining the Governmental Reporting Entity- The Supervisor of Electiorrs, as an elected constitutional officer and county agency, is considered a part of I Collier County, Florida (primary government). As such, the Supervisor of Elections' financial statements are included in the financial statements of Collier County (the "County"). Based on the criteria established by GASB 14, there are no component units included in the Supervisor of Elections' financial statements. I lb) Fund Accounting- The accounts of the Supervisor of Elections are organized on the basis of a fund and an account group, Ieach of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund and account group are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its asset.,;, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures, as appropriate. Government resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds, based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which I spending activities are controlled. The following fund type and account group are used by the Supervisor of Elections: I Governmental Fund Type I General Fund - The General Fund is used to account for financial transactions applicable to the general operations of the Supervisor of Elections which are not required to be accounted for in another fund. I General property taxes levied by the Board of County Commissioners for the Supervisor of Elections are reported as operating transfers in. Excess revenues at the end of the year, due back to the Board, are shown as operating transfers out. Account Group General Long-Term Debt - This self-balancing account group is used to account for co m pensa ted absences. i (c) Measurement Focus- Governmental Fund Type - The General Fund is accounted for on a 'spending" or "financial flow" measurement focus. Only current assets and current liabilities are included on the balance sheet. Accordingly, any reported undesignated fund balance (net current assets) is considered a measure available, spendable or appropriable resources. The operating statements present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. Account Group - The General Long-Term Debt Account Group is concerned only with the measurement of financial position. It is not involved with the measurement of results of operation.~. Long-term debt, which is intended be financed other is accounted for in the not to through funds, General Long-Term Debt Account Group, (d} Basis of Accounting- Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Basis of accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. The modified accrual basis of accounting is followed by the General Fund. Under this basis, revenues are recorded when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Available means collectible within the current period or soon thereafter, generally 60 days subsequent to year-end. Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred, ff measurable, except for unmatured interest on general long-term debt, which is recognized when due. (e) Budgetary Process- Chapter 129, Florida Statutes, governs the preparation, adoption and amendment process of the Supervisor of Elections' annual budget. The Supervisor of Elections' budget and amendments are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The budget for the General Fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis. The annual budget serves as the legal authorization for expenditures. Expenditures cannot legally exceed the total amount budgeted for each fund. All budget amendments which change the legally adopted total appropriation for a fund, are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The level of control for appropriations is exercised at the fund level. (O Fixed Assets- Acquisitions of tangible personal property are recorded as expenditures in the General Fund at the time of purchase. These assets to the Collier Florida, Board of reported County, County Commissioners and are recorded in the County's General Fixed Asset Account Group. (g} Compensated Absences- It is the Supervisor of Elections' policy to allow employees to accumulate an unlimited number of hours of unused sick leave and up to 240 hours of unused vacation leave. Upon termination, employees receive 100 percent of allowable accumulated vacation hours and a percentage of the unused sick leave, depending on years of service. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, the liability relating to the -6- m calculated amount of such unused sick leave and the full amount of the allowable accumulated vacation leave is recorded in the accompanying financial statements. Because the amount of accrued compensated absences would not normally be liquidated with expendable available resources, it is recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group. (h) Total Column on Combined Balance Sheet- The total column on the combined balance sheet is captioned "Memorandum Only" to indicate that it is presented only to facilitate financial analysis. Data in this column does not present financial position or results of operations in conformity with generally accepted Neither accounting principles. such data comparable to a consolidation. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. (2/CASH AND INVF~ME~: .Deposits- At September 30, 1997, the amount of the Supervisor of Elections' deposits with financial institutions was $595,163. These deposits were entirely covered by federal depository insurance or to the extent that balances exceeded federal depository insurance limits, they were co[latera[ized pursuant to the Florida Security for Public Deposits Act (Florida Statutes, Chapter 280). {3) RETIREMENT PLAN: The Supervisor of Elections early implemented the provisions of GASB 27, Accounting for Pensions by State and Local Government Employers, in the following disclosure. Plan Description- The Supervisor of Elections contributes to the Florida Retirement System (the "System"), a cost-sharing, pension plan by the State of Florida, Division of multiple-employer, defined benefit administered Retirement. The System provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The Florida Legislature established the System under Chapter 121, Florida Statutes, and has sole authority to amend benefits provisions. Each the year System issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. The report may be obtained by writing to the Florida Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement, 2639 North Monroe Street, Building C, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1560. Funding Policy- The System is non-contributory for employees and the Supervisor of Elections is required per statute to pay monthly contributions at actuarially determined rates. During the fiscal year, the rate was approximately 20% of annual covered payroll. The contributions of the of Supervisor Elections are established and may be amended by the State Legislature. The Supervisor of Elections' contributions to the System for the years ending September 30, 1997, 1996, and 1995 were $84,$310 $85,466, and $74,166, respectively, equal to the required contributions for each year. .7° (4) SELF-INSURANCE PROGRAMS: The Supervisor of Elections participates in the County-wide self-insurance program. The Collier County, Florida, Board of County Commissioners maintains an internal service fund to administer self-insurance activities relating to workers' compensation, and health and life insurance. The County absorbs losses up to a specified amount annually. Excess and other specific coverages are purch ¢a.sed from third-party carriers. Charges to operating departments are based upon amounts believed by the Board of County Commissioner's management to m~.~et the required annual payouts during the fiscal year and to pay for the estimated operating costs of the program. For fiscal year ended September 30, 1907, the Supervisor of Elections was charged $30,246 for these programs. (5) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN: The Supervisor of Elections offers employees a deferred compensation plan created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code, Section 457. The is available to ali the and them plan employees permits to defer a portion of their salaries until future years. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death, or unforeseeable emergency. All amounts of compensation deferred under the plan, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, property or rights, are (until paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the Supervisor of Elections (without being restricted to the provision of benefits under the plans), subject only to claims of the Supervisor of Elections' general creditors. Participants' rights under the plan are equal to those of general creditors of the Supervisor of Elections in an amount equal to the fair market value of the deferred account for each The of Elections believes that it is that participant. Supervisor unlikely it use the assets to satisfy the claims of general creditors in the future. The deferred compensation plan is reported to the Collier County, Florida, Board of County Commissioners and recorded in an Agency Fund of the County. ~61 GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT: The following changes in general long-term debt occurred during the year ended September 30, 1997: Long-term debt payable at October 1, 1996 $ 36,232 Increase in accrued compensated absences 1,755 Long-term debt payable at September 30, 1997 $ 37,9~7 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS ARTHUR ANDERSEN LL? 6' REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS To the Honorable Mary Morgan Supervisor of Elections Collier County, Florida: We have audited the financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Supervisor of Elections (th,,. "Supervisor of Elections"), as of and for the year ended September 30, 1997, and have issued our report thereon dated November 7, 1997. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accep',ed auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Aud:fing Standards (1994 Revision), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Supervisor of Elections' fi. nancial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws regulations, contracts and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Supervisor of Elections' internal controls over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively Iow level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, we noted other matters involving the internal control over financial reporting that we have reported to management of the Supervisor of Elections in a separate letter dated November 7, 1997. This report is intended for the in. formation of the management of the Supervisor of Elections and the Auditor General for the State of Florida. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November ?, 1997. SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS MANAGEMENT LETTER FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30~ 1997 Il ,/ RTHUR I %NDERSEN A~lhu~ Andcrscn II.l' MANAGEMENT LE'ITER PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF $~i'te 7~ THE AUDITOR GENERAl. FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA IIX) Norlhca~t l~md ..\vermc Fort [,audcrd,lle 1"[. %3;411- tl~.l 523 4433 To ~e Honorable Ma~ Morgan Superior of El~fio~ Co~ier Florida: CounW, We have audited the financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Supervisor of Elections, (the "Supervisor of Elections") for the year ended September 30, 1997 and have issued our report thereon dated November 7, 1997. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Complroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The purpose of this letter is to comment on those matters described in Rule 10.554(1)(e) as required by the Rules of the Auditor General for the State of Florida. Accordingly, in connection with our audit of the financial statements of the Supervisor of Elections, as described in the first paragraph, we report the following: A. CURRENT YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS Consistent with the prior year, there are no material weaknesses in financial management controls at the Supervisor of Elections. However, opportunities will continue to arise to improve existing practices. Accordingly, in connection with our audit of the financial statements of the Supervisor of Elections, as described in our first paragraph, we report the following: Imprest Account The Supervisor of Elections presently has one checking account which is used for both general and payroll-related disbursements. We recommend that a separate checking account be opened to handle al! payroll checks and that this payroll bank account be maintained on an imprest basis. An imprest payroll account should have a fixed balance (possibly $500 or less). A general account check would be deposited into the payroll account each payroll period, when the net mount of the total payroll is determined. Upon cashing the payroll checks, the balance would be brought back to the fixed dollar amount No disbursements other than payroll checks should be made on this payroll account. An imprest balance requires that the bank statement be reconciled to identical amount each an month. makes the reconciliation easier to prepare because errors or unusual reconciling items are highlighted. In addition, an imprest account limits the potential loss that may be incurred if someone alters a check or if unauthorized checks are issued. Using a separate account for payroll disbursements also aids in protecting the confidentiality of employee salaries. ....... III ...... 11111111 ' IIIIII I I II ......................... II ........... ..... I- I [ ARTHUR II /ANDERSEN B. PRIOR YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS There were no recommendations made in connection with the September 30, 1996 audit. C. OTHER MATTERS In connection with our audit of the financial statements of the Supervisor of Elections, we report the following matters described in Rule 10.554(1)(e) as required by the Rules of the Auditor General for the State of Florida: 1. No inaccuracies, irregularities, shortages, defalcations, and/or violations of laws, rules, regulations, and contractual provisions were reported in the preceding annual financial audit. 2. The Supervisor of Elections is exempt from filing the annual financial report with the Department of Banking and Finance pursuant to Section 218.32(1)(a) because it is a reporting entity of Collier County (primary government). 3. The Supervisor of Elections is not and was not during the fiscal year in a state of financial emergency as a consequence of conditions described in Section 218.503(1), Florida Statutes. 4. No violations of laws, rules, regulations and contractual provisions were discovered within the scope of the financial audit that may or may not have materially affected the financial statements. 5. No illegal or improper expenditures were discovered within the scope of the audit that may or may not have materially affected the financial statements. 6. No matters requiring correction (as defined by Rules of the Auditor General 10.554[1][e]7.) that did or did not materially affect the financial statements were noted. 7. The Supervisor of Elections as an elected constitutional officer and county agency, is considered a part of Collier County, Florida (primary government). As such, the Supervisor of Election's financial statements are included in the general purpose financial statements of Collier County. This report is intended solely for the information of the management of the Supervisor of Elections and the Auditor General for the State of Florida. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 7, 1997. County of Collier 6 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNW COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES. FLORIDA -'13941.3044 CIRCUIT COURI' COUNTY COURT Dwight E. Brock COUNTY RECORDER CLERg BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS January 29, 1998 Cynthia D. Borders-Byrd Arthur Andersen LLP Suite 700 100 Northeast Third Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 3313 I Cynthia: accept as response to the CURRENT YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS Please this memorandum section &the management letter issued by Arthur Andersen LLP to the Collier County, Florida, Supervisor of Elections. With respect to the establishment oran imprest payroll account, management does not believe that at this time there would exist the requisite cost benefit versus relationship to warrant this change. While your recommendation is not without merit, thc fact that only fourteen employees currently work for the Supervisor of Elections prevents this from being cost beneficial. In an election )'car the number of employees does increase dramatically, however these employees usually receive one check for a small amount. Management already has procedures in place to prevent some of the concerns addressed. For example, thc checks used for payroll have a different number sequence than thc checks used for vendor payment. This enables payroll errors to bc as easily identified as they would bc with an imprest account. In regard to the comment about protecting thc confidentiality of employee salaries, this is not a concern of management since employee salaries arc public record. Management w/Il continue to structure to assure that internal control and efficiency monitor thc current bank account in order concerns arc addressed. ' Sinccfel~)~-~ /General Accounting Manager Cc: Mary Morgan, Supervisor of Elections i COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TAX COLLECTOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEFI'EMBER 30, 1997 TOGETHER WTFH REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 TAX COLLECTOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Combined Balance Sheet - Ail Fund Types and Account Group 2 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance- General Fund 3 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - 4 Budget and Actual - General Fund Notes to Financial Statements 5 SUPPLENIENTARY INFORMATION Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities- Agency Funds 10 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS 11 MANAGEMENT LETTER 12 A THU ANDE SF.N LLP I REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ! To the Honorable Guy L. Carlton Tax Collector Collier County, Florida: We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Tax Collector (the "Tax Collector"), as of and for the year ended September 30, 1997, as listed in the Table of Contents. These financial statements and supplementary information referred to below are the responsibi/i,'-y of the Tax Collector's management. Our responsibility is to these financial express an opinion on statements and supplementary information based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Audih'ng Standards (1994 Revision), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatemenL An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. As discussed in Note l, the financial statements present only the Tax Collector and are not intended to pre.sent fairly the financial position of Collier County, and the results of its operations and the cash flows of its proprietary fund types in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Tax Collector as of September 30, 1997, and the results of its operations for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report, dated November 14, In accordance with Gcroernment 1997, on our consideration of the Tax Collector's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements of the Tax CoUector taken as a whole. The supplementary information included on page 10 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audil/ng procedures applied in tee audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 14, 1997. .l° COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TAX COLLECTOR STATEMENT OF REVENUES~ EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - GENERAL FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30t 1997 REVENUES: Charges for services $ 7,042,361 Miscellaneous 187t922 Total revenues 7r230,283 EXPENDITURES: Current- General government: Personal services 2,901,416 OperatLng expenditures 818,250 Capital outlay 105,403 Debt service- Principal retirement 111,229 Interest 16,271 Total expenditures 3,952,569 Excess of revenues over expenditures 3.277,714 OTHER FhNANCING USES: Return of unused fees to other governments (315,622) Operating transfers out (2,962,092) Total other financing uses (3,277,714) Excess of revenues over expenditures and other financing uses FUND BALANCE - October 1, 1996 FUND BALANCE - September 30, 1997 ~ The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. -3' COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TAX COLLECTOR STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE o BUDGET AND ACTUAL - GENERAL FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Variance Favc~rable Budget Actual (Uzff.?.vorable) REVENUES: Charges for services $ 7,042,361 $ 7,042,361 $ Miscellaneous 187,922 187,922 revenues 7,230,283 7,230,28~3~ Total EXPENDITURES: Current- General government: Personal services 2,901,416 2,901,416 - OperalSng expenditures 818,250 818,250 - Capital outlay 105,403 105,403 Debt service- Principal retirement 111,229 111,229 In terest 16~271 16,271 Total expenditures 3t952,569 3,952,569 Excess of revenues over expenditures 3,277,714 3,277,714 OTHER FINANCING USES: Return of unused fees to other governments (315,622) (315,622) - Operating transfers out (2,962,092) (2,962,092) Total other financing uses (3,277,714) (3,277,714) Excess of revenues over expenditures and other financing uses - FUND BALANCE - October 1, 1996 FUND BALANCE - September 30, 1997 $__ ~ $ . The accompanying notes to trinancial statemenB are an integral part of thi~ statement. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TAX COLLECTOR NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEFFEMBER 30, 1997 (1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUtrING POI.ICIE.q: The following is a summary of the more significant accounting principles and policies: la) Defining the Governmental Reporting Enti_ty- The Collier County, Florida Tax Collector ("Tax Collector'), as an elected constitutional officer and county agency, is considered a part of Collier County, Florida (primary government). As such, the Tax Collector's financial statements are included in the general purpose financial statements of Collier County (the "County"). Based on the criteria established by GASB 14, there are no component units included in the Tax Collector's financial statements. (b} Fund Accounting- The accounts of the Tax Collector are organized on the basis of funds and an account group, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund and account group are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures. Government resources are allocated to, and accounted for in individual funds, based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. The following fund types and account are used by the Tax Collector: group Governmental Fund Type General Fund - The General Fund is used to account for financial transactions applicable to the general operations of the Tax Collector which are not required to be accounted for in another fund. Fiduciary Fund Type Agency Fund - The Fund is used to for Agency account a~ets held as an agent for individuaL% private organizations, other governments and/or other funds. Account Group General Long-Term Debt - This self-balancing account group ks used to account for the principal amounts of general long-term indebtedness, as well as compensated absences. m.5. (c) Measurement Focus- Governmental Fund Type - The General Fund is accounted for on a 'spending' or 'financial flow" measurement focus. Only current assets and current liabilities are included the balance on sheet. Accordingly, any reported undesignated fund balance (net current assets) is considered a measure of available, spendable or appropriable resources. Governmental Fund type operating statements present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) m net current assets. Fiduciary Fund Type - The Agency Fund is custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and does not involve the measurement of results of operations. Account Group - The General Long-Term Debt Account Group is concerned only with the measurement of financial position. It is not involved with the measurement of results of operations. Long-term debts, which are not intended to be financed through Fiduciary Funds, are accounted for in the General ! ong- Term Debt Account Group. (d) Basis of Accounting- Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Basis of accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. accounting by General Fund. Under the modified accrual The modified accrual basis Of followed the basis of accounting, revenues are recorded when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Available means collectible within the current period or soon thereafter, generally 60 days, subsequent to year-end. Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred, if measurable, except for unmatured interest on general long-term debt, which is recognized when due. [e) Budgetary_ Process- Chapter 197, Florida Statutes, governs the preparation, adoption and amendment process of the Tax Collector's annual budget. The Tax Collector's budget and amendments are prepared independently of the Board of County Commissioners and are approved by the Florida State Department of Revenue. A copy of the approved budget is provided to the Board of County Commissioners. The budget for the General Fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis. The level of control for appropriations is exercised at the fund level. It') Fixed Assets- Acquisitions of tangible personal property are recorded as expenditures in the General Fund at the time of purchase. These assets are reported to the Collier County, Florida, Board of County Commissioners and are recorded in the County's General FLxed Assets Account Group. (g) Compensated Absences- It is the Tax Collector's policy to allow employees to accumulate an unlimited number of hours of unused sick leave and up to 240 hours of unused vacation leave. Upon termination, employees are vested in a portion of the unused sick leave based upon length of service. All employees are vested in 100% of allowable accumulated vacation hours. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, the liability relating ~ . i i i~lllll I I II I II ................. 1 ................ -- ......... to the estimated vested amount of such unused sick leave and the full amount of the allowable accumulated vacation leave, plus applicable fringe benefits, are recorded in the accompanying financial statements. Because the amount of accrued compensated absences would not normally be liquidated with expendable available resources, it is recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group. (h) Total Column on Combined Balance Sheet- The total column on the combined balance sheet is "Memorandum captioned Only' to indicate that it presented only to facilitate financial analysis. Data in this column does not present financial position or results of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Neither is such data comparable to a consolidation. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. (2)CASI-t AND INVESTMENTS: Deposits- At Septemt~2r30, 1997, the amount of the Tax Collector's deposits with financial institutions was $5,414,916. These deposits were entirely covered by federal depository insurance or by collateral pursuant to the Florida Security for Public Deposits Act (Florida Stat'utes Chapter 280). At September 30, 1997, the investments with trustee totaled $1,005,793, which equals its market value. These investments are deferred compensation plan assets which are invested in mutual fund pools (commercial paper and bankers' acceptances) and are not specifically identified or segregated in the Tax Collector's name and, therefore, are not categorized to give the level of risk assumed at year-end. This amount Es not required to be categorized pursuant to GASB Statement Number 3, "Deposits with Financial Institutions, Investments (including Repurchase Agreements) and Reverse Repurchase Agreements," Ix, cause it is not represented by underlying securities in either physical or book entry form. (3) RETIREMEN'F PLAN: The Tax Collector early implemented the provisions of GASB 27, Accounting for Perufions by State and Local Government Employers, in the following disclosure. Plan Description- The Tax Collector contributes to the Florida Retirement System (the "System"), a cost-sharing, multiple- employer, defined benefit pension plan admin£stered by the State of Florida, Division of Retirement. The System provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. The Florida Legislature established the System under Chapter 121, Florida Statutes, and has sole authority to amend benefits provisions. Each year the System issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. The report may be obtained by writing to the Florida Deparh'nent of Management.Service~, D/vision of Retirement, 2639 North Monroe Street, Building C, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1560. Funding Policy- The System Ls non-contributory for employees and the Tax Collector is required per statute to pay monthly contributions at actuarially determined rates. During the fiscal year, the rate was approximately 18,°,o of annual covered payroll. The contributions of the Tax Collector are established and may be amended by the State Legislature. The Tax Collector's contributions to the System for the years ending September30, 1997, 1996. and 1995 were $378,891, $364,097, and $353,865, respectively, equal to the required contributions for each year. .7- ........ ~ ~ ...... IIIIII III III ................................... I I1~ ..... IITil/ll']ll 6'1 I4) POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS: In addition to the pension benefits described in Note 3, the Tax Collector will redeem 800 hours of unused sick leave in exchange for providing postretirement health care benefits to all employees who retire in good standing on or after attaining age 55 with at least 10 years of service. The Tax Collector will fund medical premiums until retirees are eligible for Medicare coverage. Currently, no retirees meet these eligibility requirements. (5/ SELF-INSURANCE PROGRAMS: The Tax Collector participates in the County-wide self-insurance program. The Collier County, Florida., Board of County Commissioners maintains an internal service fund to administer self-insurance activir:es relating to workers' compensation, and health and life insurance. The County absorbs losses to specified amount annually. Excess and other specific coverages are pu.rchased from third-party ca,~ers. Charges to operating departments are based upon amounts believed by the Board of County Commissioners' management to meet the required annual payouts during the fiscal year and to pay for the estimated operating costs of the program. For fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, the Tax Collector was charged approximately 5210,000 for these programs. {61 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN: employees compensation plans (through two providers) created in The Tax Collector offers deferred accordance with Internal Revenue Code, Section 457. The plans are available to all Tax Collector employees and permit them to defer a portion of their salaries until future years. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death or unforeseeable emergency. Ali amounts of compensation deferred under the plans, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, property or rights, are (tmtil paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the Tax Collector (without being restricted to the provision of benefits under the plans), subject only to the claims of the Tax Collector's general creditors. Participants' rights under the plans are equal to those of general creditors of the Tax Collector in an amount equal to the fair market value of the deferred account for each participant. The Tax Collector believes that it is unlikely that it will use the assets to satisfy the claims of general creditors in the future. {7) GENERAl. LONG-TERM DEBT: The follov,4ng changes in general long-term debt occurred during the year ended September 2,0, 1997: Long-term debt payable at October 1, 1996 $ 684,347 Principal retirement (111,229) Increase in accrued compensated absences .... 5r565_ Long-term debt payable at September 30, 1997 .f,578:683 II I General long-term debt is comprised of the following: 6% capital lease obligations payable to a corporation, i collateralized by data processing equipment, payable in annual installments of $127,500, including interest through maturity in 1999 $ 243,768 I Noncurrent portion of compensated absences --334,915 I The minimum future lease payments under these capital leases as of September 30, 1997, are as follows: Year Ended September 30~ I 1998 $127,500 1999 127,500 Total minimum lease payments 255,000 Less amount representing interest 11,232 i Present value of net minimum lease payments $_243.768 18) OPERATING LEASE COMMITMENT: The Tax Collector leases space for a satellite office under an operating lease agreeme.~t which expires on March 31, 1998. The minimum future rental payments on this lease is $1,167 per month and is adjusted annually for changes in the Consumer Price Index. I The minimum rental commitment under current operating lease is as follows: I 1998 $ 7,002 Total minimum lease payments I Rental expenditures under operating leases for the year ended September 30, 1997 totaled $53,552. ~9) INTERFUND RECEWABLES [DUE FROM) AND PAYABIF$ (DUE TO): I Interfund receivable and payable balances at September 30, 1997 were: I Due from Other Due to Other Fund Funds Funds General Fund $ 49,443 $ I Agency Funds Occupational License Fund 29,570 Motor vehicle Registration Fund 14.008 i Tax Collection Fund ' 6,727 Delinquent Vaxes Fund ' 3,979 ! tunting and Fishing License Fund 958 i Vessel Regish'ation Fund 6,889 1,090 I I '9- COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TAX COLLEC'rOR STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AGENCY FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Balance Balance October 1, September 30, Total - Ail Agency Funds 1996 Additions Deletions 1997 ASSETS Cash $ 2,475,162 $ 320,092,673 $(319,581,566) $ 2,986,269 Investments with trustee 837,753 215,209 (47,169) 1,005,793 Accounts receivable 2,865 (1,970) 895 Due from other funds 4,000 . 2,889 ... 6,889 Total assets ~ $ 320.3.1.0.771 $(319.630e70~) ~:~.6 LIABILITIF~q Accrued liabilities $ 234,043 $ 11,627,588 $ (11,216,067) $ 645,564 Due to other funds 59,361 6,739,293 (6,742,322) 56,332 Due to Board of County Commissioners 533,699 93,438,854 (93,476,7&~) 495,769 Due to other constitutional o ffice rs - 102 (102) Due to other governments 1,620,238 213,458,156 (213,324,757) 1,753,637 Deferred compensation payable 837,753 215,209 (47,169) 1,005,793 Other liabilities 34,686' 8,065 42,751 Total liabilities ~$_3.3!9.. ~7~8~0 $ 325, 7~ i REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP B REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS To the Honorable Guy L. Carlton Tax Collector Collier County, Florida: We have audited the financial statements of the Collier County, Florida, Tax Collector, (the "Tax Collector"), as of and for the year ended September 30, 1997, and have issued our report thereon dated November 14, 1997. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Goveraraent Auditing Standards (1994 Revision), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. ' Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Tax Collector's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an op'L, aion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Govern men t Auditing Standards. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Tax Collector's internal controls over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively Iow level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, we noted other matters involving the internal control over financial reporting that we have reported to the Tax Collector in a separate letter dated November 14, 1997. This report is intended for the information of the management of the Tax Collector and the Auditor General for the State of Florida. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 14, 1997. TAX COLLECTOR MANAGEMENT LETTER FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, '1997 ,/ RTHUR 6 ./-kNDERSEN MANAGEMENT LETTER PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA Arlhur Anderst'n 1.1.1' Suile 7{1(1 To the Honorable Guy L. Carlton llxl Northeast Third Avenue Tax Collector Fort l.at,derdalt, FI. 33301-1160 Collier County, Florida: ~)5,1 523 4433 We have audited the financial statements of the Collier Tax County, Florida, Collector, (the Collector") for the year ended September30, 1997 and have issued our report thereon dated November 14, 1997. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Audih'ng Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are flee of material misstatement The purpose of this letter is to comment on those matters described in Rule 10.554(1)(e) as required by the Rules of the Auditor General for the State of Florida. Accordingly, in connection with our audit of the financial statements of the Tax Collector, as described in the first paragraph, we report the following: A. CURRENT YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS Agency Fund Accounting The Tax Collector manually records activities relating to the agency fund which accounts for deferred compensation. We believe that such agency fund should be automated and recorded in the general ledger. Information System Con~'ols The Tax Collector does not have formally documented policies for physical access to the computer room and data backup. Back-up tapes are currently the only source of processing resumption in the case of emergency. The Director of MIS has begun developing a disaster recovery plan. However, users have not identified critical applications or prioritized the order of restoration; restoration time frames have not been established and no provision for alternate processing has been made. Management should create adequate physical safeguards and recovery plans in order to protect physical and financial assets and assure operations of the Tax Collector in case of a disaster. II ^ RTHUR !1 ./ANDERSEN Electronic Data Processing Audits The Tax Collector Office does not perform a periodic independent evaluation of the internal control system relating to information systems. Although a limited, high-level review of information systems is performed in connection with the annual external audit, the objectives of this review are not to determine whether all Tax Collector systems are operating efficiently and effectively and are appropriatply controlled. EDP audits of controls over IS processing should be performed on a regular basis to enable prevention and early detection of errors or irregularities in processing both financial and non-financial data. .An EDP audit function within the Tax Collector's Office could perform objective and thorough independent reviews of information systems resulting in improvements in all functional areas of the organization's information systems environment and provide assurance that proper management control over systems are conscientiously maintained. The Tax Collector should consider hiring an experienced EDP auditor to perform systems reviews or use externally contracted EDP audit consultants to perform regular EDP reviews on behalf of the Tax Collector Office. B. PRIOR YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS All prior year recommendations have been fully implemented and not repeated in this section. C. OTHER MATTERS In connection with our audit of the financial statements of the Tax Collector, we report the following matters described in Rule 10.554(1)(e) as required by the Rules of the Auditor General for the State of Florida: 1. No inaccuracies, irregularities, shortages, defalcations, and/or violations of laws, rules, regulations, and contractual provisions were reported in the preceding annual financial audit. 2. The Tax Collector is exempt from filing the annual financial report with the Department of Banking and Finance pursuant to Section 218.32(1)(a) because it is a reporting entity of Collier County (primary government). is not and was not during the fiscal year in a state of financial emergency as a 3. The Tax Collector consequence of conditions described in Section 218.503(1), Florida Statutes. 4. No violations of laws, rules, regulations and contractual provisions were discovered within the scope of the financial audit that may or may not have materially affected the financial statements. 5. No illegal or improper expenditures were discovered within the scope of the audit that may or may not have materially affected the financial statements. 6. No matters requiring correction (as defined by Rules cf the Auditor General 10.554[l][e]7.) that did or did not materially affect the financial statements were noted. 7. The Tax Collector as an elected constitutional officer and county agency,, is considered a part of Collier County, Florida (primary government). As such, the Tax Collector's financial statements are included in the general purpose financial statements of Collier County. ,A RTHUR 2-XNDERSEN This report is intended solely for the information of the management of the Tax Collector and the Auditor General for the State of Florida. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution Ls not limited. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, November 14, 1997. -1-1- coLu~a COUNTY T^× COLtECTOa February 2, 1998 Arthur Andersen LLP Suite 700 100 Northeast Third Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-I 166 Attention: Ms. Cynthia'D. Borders-Byrd, CPA Subject: Audit Comments for 1996-1997 Fiscal Year I Dear Ms. Byrd: In reply to your comments and recommendations to the Tax Collector's Office for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 1997, I offer the following comments: 1. Agency Fund Accounting I agree with your observation that recording of the de fen-ed compensation activities should be done in the automated general ledger This will be system. implemented as soon possible and will be in place before the current fiscal year end. 2. Information System Controls This office maintains a policy that only authorized EDP personnel have "unlimited" physical access to the computer room. The computer room door can only be operated by a secure electronic lock, the combination of which is known only to EDP personnel. Any others desiring access to the computer mom must be authorized by the Director of Data Processing or the Tax Collector and are escorted while in the computer room. The daily backup tapes are rotated using a grandfather-father-son scheme and are stored in three secure areas of the building. Two sets are always maintained in fireproo fvaults within the building, the third is kept in the computer room for twenty-four hours following backup as it most likely to be used for routine file restoration purposes. A weekly off-site set is would be the stored in a branch office approximately fifty miles from Naples. Monthly a duplicate set is sent to a secure storage facility operated by AT&T in Orlando. Combined with these backup tapes is an i COURTHOUSE-BLDG. C-I · NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112-4907 agreement with the Property ApPraiser, located in the adjacent building, to provide emergency processing capability in case of a disaster within the Tax Collector's premises. Their system is parallel to ours and they run the same operating and development software. Our agreement is Property Appraiser. If the disaster is catastrophic and has destroyed the entire reciprocal the government complex, we have a verbal agreement to use the Manatee County Tax Collector computer system after hours, to do batch processing. Their system hardware is similar to ours. We would process our transactions at surviving Naples branch offices in an "offline" mode and transmit the batches to Manatee County for file updating during offhours and weekends. I would like to get these agreements in writing and am attempting to do so. Once a definitive agreement is reached, I plan to pursue testing on a periodic basis to ensure smooth operation in an actual disaster situation. The disaster recovery plan that is being developed does include a prioritized list of applications to be restored and an estimate on the time it would take to restore each application to the mainframe. Since all tax receipting processes are done through our point-of-sale cashiering system, these functions would all be operationally simultaneously. General ledger accounting, accounts payable, budgeting, payroll, etc., operates on the personal computer network and can readily be made functional using generic personal computer hardware available any of our branch offices. We are also identifying specific hardware requirements, and their locations to enable us to perform machine dependent functions, like mailing & postage meter usage, cop/rig, microfilming, etc. and the specific needs o fthe Motor Vehicles and Vessels Registration system, which is provided by the State of Florida. 3. Electronic Data Processing Audits I concur with your recommendation that some type EDP audit to perform system reviews be performed. We have not felt it necessary to hire an external EDP auditor to perform system reviews in the past due to the number of internal control checks and verifications done between the departments. Balancing is checked and verified with the computer reports by different individuals in separate departments. We are reviewing what the scope of such an audit should be and are identifying potential, qualified firms that could provide such an audit. Yours Truly, Collier County Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 98- 79 A RESOLb~ION BY THE BOARD OF CO~TY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO AUTHORIZE SUBMiSSiON OF AN APPLICATION TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COXMb~iTY AFFAIRS FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK G~M~T UNDER THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CATEGORY TO ASSIST WITH SANITARY SEWER, WATER, DP~INAGE ;~;D STREET IMPROVEMENTS iN THE WHITE LAKE INDUSRTIAL PARK. WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs awards grants -~ .... ~- the ..... u=_,. Small Cities Community Development B19ck ,Grant Procram cf u~ tc ~':C O0~ t~ ~ual;,~,.,g c~ties and coUntle3 f~r -e ...... low-and mcderate-~ncome persons, a~d preven~io:~ or elimination of slums or blight, or ~eet other development needs having a particular urgency because ex~st:n ccndi~ion~ pose a serious and :~media~e threat to ~he health welfare cf the community and where other financial resources are a'.'a.&a.x, tc m__% such needs; and WHEREAS, a city or county may apply each cycle Development Block Grant for Economic Development based on ~he nu~er of jobs created and the amount of private capital leveraq-d; and %'~HEREAS, applications for this grant will be 9ra~ed and ranked for funding by ~h- Florida Depar:ment of Ccmmuni.: a..a..s: WHEREAS, tke Ficr:da Sta~e Leqlsla~ure and the QC''~'''"',~''' , %:% [~:~ ~ ................ a,_ made available the amm::,~ ~: ~' :,32 '~' ' .... whlch over 160 'cities.and countles in the s~ate of F!c:'ld,% will ccmpete; and WHEREAS, to be competitive, aFplications for these funds mus= be filed with or mailed to ~he Department of Community Affalrs reach their cffice on er befere 5:00 p.m. March 31, 1998. 2297415 OR: 2402 PG: 0254 OR: 2402 PG: 0255 WHEREAS, the regulations of the Florida Department of Community Affairs and the Federal'Government require that two (2) Nearing~. that are open to the public, be advertised and held prior submitt:ng the application; and WHEREAS, the County did advertise for the first hearing on February 18, 1998, and the hearing was held in Meeting Room "G" in the Community Development Building. located at 2800 Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida on February 26. 1998 and the second hearing was advertlsel >~arch 11, 199~, and the hearing held in Meeting the Ccmmu:::~y Deuelopmen~ ~u~iding, leca~ed a~ 2500 Horseshoe Naples, Florida on March 16, I998; and WHEREAS, the area know~ as White Lake Industrial Park as described in Exhibit A attached hereto and also described in County ordinance number 93-1 (the White Lake Industrial Park), is in the preliminary stages of constructing an industrial park project on the northeast corner of 1-75 (Exit 15) and State Route 951 to assist Low to Modera=e (LMi) income residents by helping to create new lobs for LMI households. As part of this project, they have requested that the water and sewer infrastructure and streets and storm drainage improvements be provided using grant funding for a portion of the project, ~OW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY CC:.!MiSSIONERS OF COLLIER CC~$TY, FLORIDA, THAT: The Collier County Board of Count}' Commissioners hereby directs the Collier County Department of Housing and Urban Improvement to prepare, or cause to be prepared, an application to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for a Economic Development grant of up to $750,000. The funds from this grant are to be used provide sanitary sewer lines, water lines, manholes, lift stations and pave the unpaved streets in the White Lake Industrial Park. ....... OR: 2402 PG: 0256 The Board of County Commissioners hereby authorizes the Count7 Administrator to sign the application and other documents pertainin~ to the application, to accept the grant funds on behalf of the county, and to act in behalf of the Board of County Commissioner~ to sign all documents, including the quarterly reports, necessary for grant administration if the County receives the award of either grant. BE IT FURTHER R£SOLVED that this Resolution be recorded by %ke Official Clerk of Courts in the ~dblio Records of Collier County, Florida. ADOPTED this J? day of March, 1998. DATE: ,/~?.'?~ COLSIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUFFICIENCY: Heidi F. Asheon Assistant County Attorney i~...: ... 8 /~ OR: 2402 PG: 0257 Exhibit The White Lake industrial is a proposed 144.4 AC Planned Unit Development located in Section, 35, To%~ship 49 South, Range 2~ East, and is generally bordered on the west by Exit 15 of Interstate 1-75; on the north by PUD property and the County's Water Treatment Plant; to the east by a vacant parcel of property that is zoned Agriculutrai, and the south by Interstate 1-75 and PUD Tollgate Commercial Center. (See Attached Maps) . ~'~?~"~"~' '~ 8 ~ OR: 2402 PG: 0258 LOCATION MAP NTS D. Alternative Four- Remain at Existing Landfill Site Implement additional odor control measures. Do not acquire new landfill site "L". Do not enter into an export agreement. PROS · Odor is controlled similar to Broward landfill. · No cost increases. · Does not take active agricultural land. · We own the land. It provides county with maximum control over the availability and cost of waste disposal. · We use current landfill for full contract period. We do not pay any early out costs on the current WMI contract. · County doesn't have additional post closure costs of $300,000 per year. CONS · Current landfill site is active, not inactive. · Need to find another location for county yard waste and waste water treatment plant sludge. RECOMMENDATION Select alternative four. Landfills in proximity to residential areas can and do work -- if odor is properly managed. Odor was the reason for planning to move the landfill. Correction of the odor problem should be the reason for keeping the landfill where it is. GOLDEN GATEAREA CIVIC ASSOCIATION 13 B 1 4701 Golden Gate Parkway Golden (;ate, FL 34116 N!.~rch 24 MN I.I.HN4NI )1./ ~'~' a !.'F.' ill IJlO ('(IIIIIIIINSIIlll IITI~Tllll~ I(~J;l~ ' ' ' II'ynqr dec,~n~ lh~ mnmm0 ~ lo lrurk thc trash n~ hi' lt~e cotmrv. I welcnme Ihnt dec~,o. I feel I~,~i dcc,~.m ~ ,il tx~ .cccp,,hlc ~;, re~,dcm~ livi.g m < ,olden ~ ,mc. ~ ,o~dc. (,.to Esu,m~ t .nder~tnnd fhcre ~re cmic~ who indicate In~ckme ~ onh' ~ ~ho~ te~ endc~ror )~ vc~r~ ~'*H~ C~'len~,nn~ of'5 nr I(1 vc~r~ each can he e~;nhhchcd ~hh Waste M0n~orment. pi:m I}~r df~D~:tl ' prev,m,cl~- . P il'vm~ ~h~mhl ch~c I. rch~:ale 1o &~lc '[,". Ih~q 1~ ~'~tl lake .ppmxim.lclv .%7 ye.re will .llmv tbr ~l~e tm~e Io p.rcha~e the D.d. ~zone Ihe pml~.y. ~eqmm .il the nppmprmle bmld the l~rql ~)thcr dccWion w~tl enable W~fe ~n~emenl ~d The ('o.ntv, Ibc lime fo be,in crcaltvc ~ ml~( l,pin~, pro?am ~)l'lhc cxml~ng s,c~' perimeter. I g~s will prm'Mc I~c J ~JlCVLt cvc~'(~nc undcr~l;~ncJ~ how hard Ihi~ (Jccl~i~)n ~'~li ~ I(xJ,v. h,I ~l i~ c~cnllat m Ibc lillHrc ()f iand is Ihr imp,,lallm~ in ~t,e proxmilv lo lhe sile and ils effecls hy mi.r and WHirr am,rrr I. lifts land fiilin~ operaDnn. I he cx~qDn,j ~,tc win,Id no Ion,Jet l~llmv lh,~ ct, cfm w,h an approx,mn~c pnp,~ta*,nn re~idemg m a ~, mile radm~ ' ' '~ hank vn, ~r ~Howm~ me ~he oppommi~y to prm'~de my opinion on ~hi~ ~'e~' impo, am biN( 'RR F,i,Y. ('HE~YI.~. NEWMAN PRFSII)FN r RESOLUTION NO. 98-80 RESOLUTION APPOINTING JOANNE MARRO QUINN TO THE HISTORIC/ARCIIAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION BOARD WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 91-70 created the Historic/Archaeological Preservation Board and provides that the County Commission shall appoint seven (7) members to the Historical/Archaeological Preservation Board; and WHEREAS, there is currently a vacancy on this board; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Joanne Marro Quinn, representing the category of'Citizen-At-Large, is hereby appointed to the Historic/Archaeological Preservation Board to fulfill the remainder of the vacant term, said term to expire on October 1, 1998. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: March 24, 1998 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA / BA 'R:BARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMA.~ Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel ~ County Attomey DCW&n 10B RESOLUTION NO. 98-81 A RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING W. HERMAN SPOONER TO THE IMMOKALEE ENTERPRISE ZONE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~VHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida adopted Ordinance No. 95-22 establishing thc lmmokalce Enterprise Zone Development Agency pursuant to Section 290.001, et seq., Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 95-22 provides that the Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency shall consist of not fewer than eight (8) or more than thirteen (13) members; and WHEREAS, the term ofonc member will expire on April 4, 1998; and WHEREAS, thc Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that W. Herman Spooner is hereby reappointed under thc Business Owner and Resident category to the Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency for a four year term, said term to expire on April 4, 2002. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: March 24, 1998 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA / ' / / / BAI~,~ARA B.-~ERRNf, CH'AI~A~W / Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: County Attorney DCW/kn RESOLUTION NO. 98-82 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING AND REAPPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE HOUSING FINANCE AUTItORITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, thc Board of County Commissioners of Collier County adopted Ordinance No. 80-66 creating thc }lousing Finance Authority ot' Collier County, Florida, pursuant to Chapter 159, Part IV, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 80-66 provides that thc Housing Finance Authority of Collier County, Florida shall be composed of five (5) members; and WHEREAS, there are currently two (2) vacancies on this board; and WHEREAS, thc Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: I. Thomas M. Palmer is hereby appointed to the Housing Finance Authority of Collier County, Florida, for a four year term, said term to expire on August 3, 2001. 2. John T. Conroy, Jr., is hereby reappointed to the Housing Finance Authority of Collier County, Florida, for a four year term, said term to expire on August 3, 2001. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: March 24, 1998 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA " - - /" '- BAR~IARA B. BERI~Y, CH')~dI;hk4A]N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: I~.~,id C. Weigel County Attorney RESOI,UTION NO. 98-83 A RESOI,UTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO TilE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AI,TERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT GROUP \VI IEREAS. the U.S. Am~y Corps of Engineers is currently preparing an Environrner,;fi Impact Statement (ELS) lo report Io federal officials on tile potential cnvironmenlal irnpacts that arc anticipated to result from permitted development in Southwest Florida; and WI.I EREAS, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) has recommended that bolh Collier County and Lee County assist the ACOE in their preparation of thc EIS by appointing members consisting of interested citizens, organizations, and agencies to an alternative development group hosted by lhe ACOE to evaluate potential affects of development and provide alternative development plans that reflect the range of viewpoints in the community; and \VHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has received a recommendation for additional appointments lo this group; NOW, TllEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COI,LIER COUNTY. FLORIDA, lhat Mike Taylor anti Bob Roth are hereby appointed to seine Collier County as members of the Army Corps of Engineers' Ahernativc Development Group. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: March 24, 1998 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA " ' BARBARA B. BERRY. Chaim~lan Approved as to fom~ and legal sufficiency: David C. \Vcig~' - -~ County Attorney DCW/kn 3301 East Tamiami Trail · Naples. Florida 34112.49~ Jo~n C. Norns (941) 774-8097 * F~ (941) ~4.3602 D~sttict t Timothy L, Hancock. AICP Oistnct 2 ~mothy J. Constantine ~rch 24, 1998 Distnct 3 Pamela S. Mac'Kie District 4 Barbara B. Ber~ District 5 Mr. Bob Baron Department of the Army Jacksonville District Corps of Engineers P. O. Box 4970 Jacksonville, FL 32232-0019 RE: Alternative Development Group/Environmental Impact Statement in Southwest Florida Dear Mr. Ban'on: As you 'know, while convened in regular session on Tuesday, March 17, 1998, the Collier County Board of Commissioners appointed its members to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Alternative Development Group (ADG). As a result of the SWIG meeting, and since the focus ofthe EIS Study is larger th,tn originally thought it would be, we felt, along with you, it would be in the best interest of the County to make sure we had representation from the far eastern pan of Collier County. Subsequen~Iy. on March 24, 1998, the Collier County Board of Commissioners voted to submit the names of one additional member and an alternate representing the Golden Gate Estates Area. Regular Member representing Land Management: Mr. Bob Roth Ban'on Collier Company Highway 29 Immokalee, FL 34143 (941) 657-3602 Alternate Member representing Agfi-business: Mr. Mike Taylor Collier Enterprises 4641 3rd Avenue, North Naples, FL 34119 (94 I) 352-9226 IOD Mr. Bob Barron March 24, 1998 Page Two I look forward to working with you in the future and, in the meantime if you have any questions. or if you feel that we can be helpful to you in some other way, please do not hesitate to contact me or our liaison, Commissioner Timothy L. Hancock. Sincerely, t~arbar'~ B. Berry, Chairman Collier County Board of Commissioners BBB:sf Enclosure cc: Board of County Commissioners Robert F. Fernandez, County Administrator David Weigel, County Attorney Vince Cautero, Administrator, Community Development and Environmental Services 12B 1 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR I,[-:GAI, AI)VERTISING OF IH!IH.lC IIEARINGS 'Fro Clerk Io thc Bmu'd: Please i)lacc lite I'(dhn~in~ as a: XXX Norm:fi legal Advertisement ~ Other: ( Disphsy Adv.. loc:it ion. tlc. ) .... ............. Origin:mag Depl/Div: CommDev. S~'./Plamm,g Person: ~,, ~ j D:ue:~-J~ - Petition No. (If none, give brief dcscripl~on): Petition No. PUD-gT-14(2) Pclilioncr: t~am: & Address): <Man D Reynolds, AICP, Wilson, Miller B:mon A.Peek, Inc., 3200 Bailey Lane, St:~t~ 20o, Naples, Florida 34105 Name ~ Address of any person(s) to be nolificd by Cl~rk's Omce: (If more space is n~ccl~cl, allach s~p:lrat~ sheet) }[earing bcDre XXX BCC BZA Off,er Ncwspa~r(s) Io ~ used: (Complete only if hn~nant): XXX Naples Daily New~ OIl~er ~ Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common I~afion & Size: Comp:mion petition(s), if an7 & proposed hearing date: Docs Pcdtion Fee include advcrl~sing cost'? ~s ~ No Ir Yes. ~hal account should be charged for advertising costs. 113-138323-649110 ~" ~: ' ~ ;' '-~' ~ Approved Reviewed by: "' -- - Division I lcad D Il COtlllly Manager Date List Altachmcms: !) ISTR1 B [!TION I NgTIH.!CTIO NS A. For he:trln~s I)cfl)re BCC or BZA: htili:ttin~ I)cr.~on lo COml)lele one coy ;md ol)l:dn Division llcad nl)prov:fl I)cfi)rc submitting to C(mnty M:m:t~cr. Nato: If Ic~M document is involved, Itc sure th:it any necessary legal rca'ices, or request f'ur s:tlllC, iS submitted to C(nmtx Att.rue) bcl'.rc sul)mittin~ t() COllllt)' ~l;Itl:l~Cl'. Thc M:ma~er's (fi'rice ~s ill (listribulc Col)ic~: [] County ,'s,l:Ul:H~er :tgenda file: to [] RC(lUC.'~lin~ Divisim~ [] O,'i~hl:d Clcrk'.~ Office B. Oil(er hearings: Initiating Division he:id to approxc and subilm original to Clerk's Office. rctanmlg :t copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Ii1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I~. JUDIT]] FLANACAN LOCATION: NAPLES DAILY NE~S FkX 1~O.: 263-4864 CO~EElqTS: Re: ~< !111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'ii111IIIIII!i!i11111 FROM' ELLIE HOFFMAN - MINUTES & RECORDS LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX ~O: (813) 774-8408 PHONE 'NO: (813) 77/, 08* 01' 54 92634864 ~ ~068C8~0~8A12~ nt: February 23, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-87-14(2) Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, March 8, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 800551 12B 1 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, )5%RCH 24, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 92-23, AS AMENDED, THE WILSON PROFESSIONAL CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY PROVIDING FOR SECTION ONE, AMENDMENTS TO SUBSECTION 4.2.1. PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES OF SECTION 4.2, PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES OF SECTION IV, PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition PUD-87-14(2), Alan D. Reynolds, AICP, of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., requesting an amendment to the Wilson Professional Center Planned Unit Development (PUD). Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) February 23, 1998 Mr. Ron Nino Community Development Services/Planning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34112 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-87-14(2) Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 12_B 1 February 23, 1998 Mr. Alan D. Reynolds, AICP Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-87-14(2) Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure ORDINANCE'NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE Ak'E:'~DING ORDINANCE 92-23,:...'~ AMENDED, THE WILSON PROFESSIONAL CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMEHT, BY PROVIDING FOE SECTION ONE, ,~.IE,~,.~EN,~ TO SUBSECTION 4.2.1. PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES OF SECTION 4.2, PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES OF SECTION IV, PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPb~ENT STANDARDS; AMD BY ~P. OVIDI:~G FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEP. EAS, on April 28, 1992, the Board of County Co~issicner3 approved Ordinance Number 92-23, which established the Wilson Professional Center Planned Uni~ Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, Alan D. Reynolds, AICP of Wilson, Miller, Barton and Peek, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of C,~lier County, Florida ~ amend ~ ~ O.d.na..u. NumDer 92-23, as se: forth below: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Corn. missioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SUBSECTION 4.2.1, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES OF SECTION 4.2, PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES OF SECTION IV, PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Subsection 4.2.1.a) of Section 4.2 Permitted Uses .~zd Struztures of Section IV, Permitted Uses and Development Standards cf the W~iscn Professional Center Planned Unit Development {Ordinance }2-33), is hereby ame..d~ to read as ,; 2 i Fermit~ed Drinri~al '.'ses and "~ ...... ~ 72,~2.0 sq. ~%., llmitea %o two ~nd subject %o the f2ii~winc i!mi~a:i~ns: .. Emergency me~:cal 7~lnlCS are ]ccuFanc'/ : l-, }>.;' .~q. ft. ..... rn:nance snal become effective upon filing with the Department -~: Jtate. Words strucP throua are deleted; words ~ are added. PASSED AND ~ULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 1998. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ,a~, --. -..-,~, :LE.RK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN APP.:CVED AS TO FCRN AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: ASSISTANT COUNTY ."-.TTORNEY NapLes Datty Haples, Affidavit of Publication ,:: ;~ NapLes Da~Ly Ne~s ~: ~ ' : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTN: NANCY SAL~UB PO BOX ~3016 NAPLES FL ]~0~-30~6 NOTICE O~NTENT TO CONSIOER O~OlNANC~ N~lce Is h~r,~V given J thOt O~ TUESDAY. MARCH ~4. 1~1. I, ~ J mlnls~l~ Bolldl~. Col. REFERENCE: ~230 8~551 tl~ C~ ~nme~l 5765~I~9 NOTZCE OF ]HTENT T0 Ce~er, 3301 Eost Totals- mi Trail, Naples, ~e B~d ~ C~ Com. State of FLorida missl~ers will C~sI~ ~e en~me~t of ~ Cou~ County of CoL~te~ Ord;~nce. The meetly9 Before the undersJgned authority, personaLLy will commence ~ A.~. The title of of appea~ed AngeLs Bryant/ vho on oath says that she ~s~ ~el~ce ~ serves as Assistant Secretary of the NapLes DaiLy AN ORDINANC~ Heys, a daily newspaper published at Naples/ in AMENDING ORDI. ColLier County~ FLorida: that the attached copy NANCE 92-23, AS AMENDED, THE W~L- of advertising uss published ~n sa~d nevspaper o~ son PROFESSIONAL dates Listed. CEHTER PLANNED UNIT Affiant further says that the said Naples DaiLy BY PROVIDING FO~ Neus is a neuspaper pubLtsh~ at Naples/ tn said AMENDMENTSECTION ~N~ Collier County~ FLorida~ and that the said SUBSECTION 4.2.1. newspaper has heretofore been conttn~us[y PERMITTED PRINCI- PAL U~S AND STRUC. pubCished tn said CoLtter County~ Ftortda~ each TURES OF SECTION day and has been enter~ as second class ea1[ ~.2, PER,IT, D U~S AND STRUCTURES matter at the ~st office tn Nap[es~ tn said ~CTION IV, PERMIT. TED U~S AND Collier County~ F[orida~ foe a per~ of 1 year v E L O P ~ E N T next preceding the first ~bLicatton of the STANDARDS: AND attached copy of advertisement; and affiant PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. further says that she has neither paid nor Petition PUD.~7.14(2), promised any person, f~rm or co~ratton any Alon D. Rey~l~, AICP, discount~ rebate, commission or refund for the Peek, I~., re~stl~ put,se of securing this advertisement fop omendme~ to the WII~ Professional Center publication tn the said newspaper. Plonned Unit ~evelo~. me~ (PUDL PUBLISHED ON: 0~/08 C~les of the ~di~e ~e ~ tile w~ ~e Clerk ~ ~e ~d ~e ~olloble f~ Inst. tio~ All In~rest~ ~e Invffed to ~d be he~ Any ~ ~ ~ · e B~d ~11 n~ o re- AD SPACE: 80.~ INCH c~d ot the FILED ON: 03/~/98 pe~olnlng ~ereto o~ ........................... ~ .................... + ...... ~ .......... ensue ~ o v~m ' - ,vldence ~ ~lc~ ,o .o COLLIER COUNTY~ Personally knovn by me · , 1 FLORIDA /~ - BARBARA B. BERRY~ CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK B~/S/EIIle H~m~, ~ch I No. 116~3 ORDINANCE NO. 98- 21 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 92-23, AS AMENDED, THE WILSON PROFESSIONAL CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY PROVIDING FOR SECTION ONE, AMENDMENTS TO SUBSECTION 4.2.1. PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES OF SECTION 4.2, PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES OF SECTION IV, PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on April 28, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 92-23, which established the Wilson Professional Center Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, Alan D. Reynolds, AICP of Wilson, Miller, Barton and Peek, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida to amend Ordinance Number 92-23, as set forth below: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SUBSECTION 4.2.1, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES OF SECTION 4.2, PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES OF SECTION IV, PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Subsection 4.2.1.a) of Section 4.2 Permitted Uses and Structures of Section IV, Permitted Uses and Development Standards of the Wilson Professional Center Planned Unit Development (Ordinance 92-33), is hereby amended to read as follows: 4.2.1 Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a. Offices and medical offices with a maximum of ~ 72,000 sq. ft., limited to two buildings, and subject to the following limitations: 1. Emergency medical clinics are prohibited. 2. Medical office uses are limited to a maximum occupancy of 17,396 sq. ft. SECTION TWO: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Words struck throuqh aredele~edf WOrds ~ are adBe~. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of County, Florida, this _.~ day of ~, 1998. Collier · ~ ~ ATTEST: ." '. BOARD OF. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS )'i~.i. DWIGHT E. BROd~, 'CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA APPROCED AS TO FO~M AND BA~)k~)%"~/'BERk%Y, LEGAL SUFFICIENCY': AtteSt a~ MARJO E M. STUDENT ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY Words struck throuqh are deleeed;:word, ~ are added. STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 98-21 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 24th day of March, 1998, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 26th day.of March, 1998. DWIGHT E BROCK .-'"' " Clerk of Courts and-~r~ Ex-officio to Board" of. Cou~ aureen Kenyofi.' "..?; %__ Deputy Clerk .. ~ '.' · ..... -' · ~;~ ~ ~ ~ including this cover) I!i!i!11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I!11111111 LOCATION: ~LES DAILY ~S ~ ~O.: 263-4864 lillllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllil'lillllllllllllllllll FROM: _______ ELLIE HOFFMAN -MINUTES & RECORDS L_ LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX 2;0: (813) 774-8408 PHONE 'NO: (813) February 23 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-89-41(1) Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, March 8, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No 800551 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY~ MARC~ 24, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami~Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-62 THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE AMENDMENTS TO GENERAL SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT ~, REGULATIONS SECTION; SECTION TWO, AMENDMENTS TO USES PERMITTED SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SUBSECTION; SECTION · THREE, AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition PUD-89-41(1), Bruce Tyson, AICP, of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., representing Shoppes at Santa Barbara, Inc., requesting an amendment to the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) February 23, 1998 Mr. Bruce Tyson, AICP Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-89-41(1) Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure [[[ [[ [[ [ [ 11111 I I II [Ill Illl ........ 2 February 23, 1998 Shoppes at Santa Barbara, Inc. 3 Grove Isle Drive, Suite 1708 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-89-41(!) Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure XXX Normal legal Advcniscmcnt [] Othcr: (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dcpt/Div: CommDcv. Scrv./Planning Person:__ ~ ~,,.,,c.~.a-.,~ Date: 2 - / ~' ~ ~ Petition No. (If none, give brief dcscfi ption): PUD-8941 (1) Petitioner: (Name & Address): Shoppcs at Santa Barbara, Inc., 3 Grove Isle Drive, Suite 1708, CoconukGrove, FL 33133 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Bruce Tv:,on, AICP, Wilson, Miller Barton & Peck, Inc., 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200, Naples, FL 3410:5 .__. Hearing before XXX BCC BZA Other Ncwsl:uqpcr(s) lo be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News Other [] Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Companion pctition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Docs Petition Fcc include advertising cost? [~i~cs'~' [] No If Yes. xx'hat account should be charged for advertising costs: 113-138323-649110 '~C/ ~ (~')O0~-'._q'/ Reviewed by: Approved by: Division Head Date Count)' Manager Date List Attachments: DISTRIBIJTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one cuy and obtain Division llead approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's o~ce will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a cop.,,' for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE US~ ONLY: Date Received: ,,~. ,,q,~"' Date of Public bearing: ,,~,/'.,,L.~'.~.~d"' Date Advcrlised: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-62 THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE AMENDMENTS TO GENERAL SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION; SECTION TWO, AMENDENTS TO USES PERMITTED SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT P. EGULATiOHS SUBSECTION; SECTION THREE, AMEHDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on December 12, 1989, the Board of County Commissiomers approved Ordinance Number 89-62, which approved the Shoppes at Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, Bruce Tyson, AICP of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., representing Shoppes at Santa Barbara, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida to amend Ordinance Number 89-62, as set forth below: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO GENERAL SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION Subsection 4.2 entitled "General" of Section IV entitled "General Development Regulations" of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (Ordinance No. 89-62), as amended), is hereby amended to read as follows: 4.2. GENERAL Where specific standards pertaining to such things as siqnage and landscaping are not specifically included in ':his ~r:umer:t, '~he applicable standards of the Collier Count,:' ~..~..~ ' ' .... Land Develocment Code ~hat are in effect at the~time of applica%icn shall apply. SECTION TWO: ~MENu~,,~,I.o TO '_~SES PERM!TED SUBSECTION CF .......... DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION Subparagraphs l, 3, 6, i!, 13, 15, 16 and 22 of Paragraph A, Subsection 4.3 entitlefl, "Uses Permitted" of Section iV entitled, "General Development Regulations" of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (Ordinance No. ~9-6£, :s ,menzea; ~s :.ereoy amended ts read as follows: Words struck throu h are deleted; words underline__~d are added. 12B 2 4.3. USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Principal Commercial Uses 1. Automobile service stations (no repair services) (in accordance with the standards of £ccticn 9.0 ^~ thc ~cnlng ........... Section 2.6.28 of the Land Development Code); antique shops; appliance stores; art supply shops; automobile parts stores. 2. Bakery shops; bait and tackle shops; banks and financial institutions; barber and beauty bath supply stores; bicycle sales and services; blueprint shops; bookbinders; book stores; business machine services. 3. Car washes (enclosed only); carpet and floor covering sales-which may include storage and installation; child care centers (no less than five hundred feet from an establishment selling or serving alcoholic beverages for consumption on premises unless an exemption is granted pursuant to the requirements of SA~A~ o ~, ,~ cf thc Zoning Ordinanc~ Section 2.6.10 of the Land Development Code); churches and other places of worship; clothing stores; cocktai~ i?unge~ (in accordance with the standards of ~cc. icn ~.Ii of thc Zoning Ordinance Section 2.6.10 of the Land Development Code); commercial recreation uses - indoor; commercial schools; confectionery and candy stores. 4. Delicatessens; department stores; drug stores; dry cleaning shops; dry goods stores; and drapery shops. 5. Electrical supply stores; equipment rentals including lawn mowers and power saws, which may include their repair and sale. 6. Fish market - retail only; florist sheds; fraternal ~nd social c!'Jb~ ~iin acccrdanc~ ~:ith tk ...... homes; furniture stores; furrier shops. 7. Garden supply s~cres - outside display in side and rear yards; gift shops; glass and mirror sales - including storage and installation; gourmet shops. 8. Hardware stores; hat cleaning and blocking; health food stores; homes for the aged; hospitals and hospices. 9. Ice-cream; stores. 10. Jewelry stores. Words struck throuqh are deleted; words ~ are added. I 12B 2' 11. Laundric: :clf :crvic: on!yl ~Leather goods; legitimate theaters; liquor stores; locksmiths. 12. Marinas; markets - food; markets - meat; medical offices and clinics; millinery shops; motels and hotels; motion picture theaters; museums; music stores; mini warehouses and storage facilities; minor automobile repair work. 13. New car dealership - outside display permitted; news stores. -:-~ -'.,~- ~ ..... 14. Office - general; office supply stores. 15. Paint and wallpaper stores; pet shops; pet supply shops; photographic equipment stores; pottery stores; printing; publishing and mimeograph services shops; pr~ ...... ~..~- {in ..... ~-- ... ..... - .............. cc ~:i'~ the .......... c Scction o ~ ~ ~^ Zcnin~ n_~ ...... ) professional offices. 16. Radio and television sales and services; ra3io station (offices and studios), and auxiliar,/ transmitters and receiving equipment, but not principal transmission tower; research and design labs; rest homes; restaurants - including drive-in or fast food restaurants (in accordance with the standards of .cc.icn o ~ .~ thc ZcnlnG Ordinancc Section 2.6.10 of the Land Development Code). 17. Shoe Repair; shoe stores; shopping centers; souvenir stores; stationery stores; supermarkets and sanatoriums. 18. Tailor shops; taxidermists; tile sales - ceramic tile; tobacco shops; toy shops; tropical tish stores. 19. Upholstery shops. 20. Variety stores; vehicle rental - automobiles only; veterinarian offices and clinics - no outside kennels. 21. Watch and precision instrument repair shops. 22. Any other commercial use of professional service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and whirh %he ~cnin? DevelcDment S~r.-~,~..~¢~,,:rectcr determines ~o be compatible with ~ne above uses. SECTION ?HREE: AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUBSECTION OF GENERAL OEVELOP~.!ENT REGULATIONS SECTION Paragraphs H entitled "Parking" and J entitled "Landscape Buffer" of Subsec%ion 4.~1 entitled "Development Regulations" of Section IV entitled "General Development Regulations" of the Shoppes at San~a Barbara PUD (Ordinance No. e9-62, as amended), is hereby amended to read as follows: Land 2evelosment Code in effect at the time of application for perm[ts. Words struck ~hrQuqh are dele=ed; words ~ are added. J. Landscape Buffer: e~, A ten (10) foot landscaped buffer shall be constructed along the northern section of the property south of the access road as depicted of the Conceptual PUD Master Plan. If commercial zoning is approved on the tract to the east at the time development permits are requested, the buffer shall not be required adjacent to said commercially zoned tract. Any landscaping buffer will be required in accordance with the standards of ~ Section 2.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. EC~.~, FDUR: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners .of Collier County, Florida, this day of __ ., 1998. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY:BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY f/susan/Shoppe$ at Santa Barbara PUD Words struck throug_~h are deleted; words underlined are added. ,apl., ,a, ly ,., 1 2 B 2 Naples, FL 33940 Affidavit of Publics:ton Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMN[SSZONERS ATTN: NANCY SALOGUB PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 NOTICE GF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, AAARCH 24, 1998, in the REFERENCE: 001230 800551 Boordroom, 3rd Floor. minlstrotlo~ Building. Ccd. 576541/.1 NOTICE OF INTENT TO Ilar Courdv Government Center, 3301 East Tamio- mi Troll, Nc~le% State of FLorida the Boord of Coum%' Com- County of Collier missioners will conslde~ the enactment Of o Cou~V Before the undersigned authority, personally Ordinance. The meeting appeared Angels Bryant, who on oath says that she will commence o~ 9~0 A.A6. The fl~e Of Of the serves as Assistant Secretary of the Naples Deity pro~esed Ordinance Is as News, a daily newspaper published at NapLes, in follow~: AN ORDINANCE Collier County, FLorida: that the attached copy AMENDING ORDI- of advertising was published in said newspaper on NANCE 19-62 THE SHOPPES AT SANTA dates listed. BARBARA PLANNED Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) BY PROVIDING News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said FOR: SECTION ONE Collier County, FLorida, and that the said AARENDNtENTS TO GENERAL SUBSEC- newspaper has heretofore been continuously TION OF GENERAL published in said Collier County, FLorida, each v E L O P M E N T REGULATIONS SEC- day and has been entered as second class mail TION; SECTION TWO, matter at the post office in Naples, in said AAAENDAAENTS TO USES PERMITTED Cattier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year SUBSECTION OF GEN- next preceding the first publication of the __ERAL DEVELORMENT attached copy of advertisement; and affiant REGULATIONS SUB- SECTION: SECTION further says that she has neither paid nor THREE, AMEND- promised any person, firm or coporation any MENTS TO DEVELOP. N~ENT STANDARDS discount, rebate, co~mission or refund for the SUBSECTION OF GEN- purpose of securing this advertisement for ERAL DEVELOPN~ENT publication in the said newspaper. REGULAT'ONS SEC- TION' AND BY PROVID- ING ' AN EFFECTIVE PUBLISHED ON: 03/08 DATE. Petition PUD-89.4 I{1), Bruce Tyson, AICP, of Wil- SOn. Miller, Borton & Peek, Inc., re~reserrttn9 Shcx~es al Sonta Bar. boro, Inc. requesting on omendmerd to the Shoo. AD SPACE: 88.000 INCH '---~Jb'at Sonla Barbara 03/09/98 co, les of ~he FZLEO ON: Ordinance are on file wfth the Clerk to the Board ............................ : ...... -. ..... -~---.---T" (' Ore avollable tore' Inspec- ~ j.~.j~, tlon.ore An Interested partleSoml / l~,"r,/, ' ~//'.?~-'~'~/ ' ' ~'?,",' )/ Invited to offend Signature of Affiant be he~d. · Any person who decld- Sworn to and Subscribed before me thts ''~ day of / ~'/1'1. 19Zt-~ es to appeal a decision of the Board wfll need o re* ;// ,./,-,./ '") / · cord of the ~'oceedln~s Personally knotm by me ~'~, / _.',~'1,,¢..~,,.~I perlolnlno thereto ond ....... '' therefore; may need to ensure that a verlocrflm record of the I~'Oceedlmas Is mode, which reco~/d eludes the testimony evidence uoo~ which the BOARD OF COUNTY CON~N~ISSIONER S COLLIER COUNTY, FLORE)A BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIR/V~AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK B~/s/Eme Hoffrnc~, ..: i;',:',:'?.. ~s~r~ Clerk ' .:.",".,,-, dud/Ih A..~SE~ch I 11630~5 12B 2 ORDINANCE NO. 98- 2--2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-62 THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE AMENDMEMTS TO GENERAL SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION; SECTION TWO, AMENDENTS TO USES PERMITTED SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SUBSECTION; SECTION THREE, AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on December 12, 1989, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance r. lumber 89-62, which approved the Shoppes at Sant.] Barbara Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, Bruce Tyson, AICP of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., representing Shoppes at Santa Barbara, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida to amend Ordinance Number 89-62, as set forth below: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: AblENDMENTS TO GENERAL SUBSECTION'OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION Subsection 4.2 entitled "General" of Section IV entitled "General Development Regulations" of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (Ordinance No. 89-62), as amended), is hereby amended to read as follows: 4.2. GENERAL Where specific standards pertaining to such things as sJqnage and landscaping are not specifically included in this document, the applicable standards of the Collier County v^~,,~ ~.~ ....... ~ ~'~'---~vision regulations Land Development Code that are in effect at the time of permit application shall apply. SECTION TWO: AMENDMENTS TO USES PERMITED SUBSECTION OF GENEEAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION Subparagraphs 1, 3, 6, ]1, 13, 15, 16 and 22 of Paragraph A, Subsection 4.3 entitled, "Uses Permitted" of Section IV entitled, "General Development Regulations" of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (Ordinance No. 89-62, as amended) is hereby amended to read as follows: Words struck throuqh are deleted; words underlined are added. 4.3. USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Principal Commercial Uses 1. Automobile service stations (no repair services) (in accordance with the standards of C~e .......... ...... Zc ..... ~ .......... ~ Section 2.6.28 of the Land Development Code); antique shops; appliance stores; art supply shops; automobile parts stores. 2. Bakery shops; bait and tackle shops; banks and financial institutions; barber and beauty shop~: bath supply stores; bicycle sales and services; blueprint shops; bookbinders; book stores; business machine services. 3. Car washes (enclosed only); carpet and floor covering sales-which may include storage and installation; child care centers (no less than ~ive hundred feet from an establishment selling or serving alcoholic beveraqes for consumption on premises unless an exemption is qranted pursuant to the requirements of ~ ..... o ~ Zcnlnq .............. Section 2.6.]0 of the Land Development Code); churches and other places of worship; clothing stores; cocktail lounges (in accordance with the standards of £ccticn 7.1! of ~ .... ;nS ~; .... e Section 2.6.10 of the Land Development Code); commercial recreation uses - indoor; commercial schools; confectionery and candy stores. 4. Delicatessens; department stores; druo stores; dry cleaning shops; dry goods stores; and drapery shops. 5. Electrical supply stores; equipment rentals including lawn mowers and power saws, which may include their repair and sale. 6. Fish market - retail only; florist shops; and social clubs ~in accsrdancc ~:ith t~ ......................... ~ ........... )~ funeral homes; furniture stores; furrier shops. 7. Garden supply stores - outside display in side and rear yards; gift shops; glass and mirror sales - including storage and installation; gourmet shops. 8. Hardware stores; hat cleaning and blockinc; health food stores; homes for the aged; hospital~ and hospices. 9. Ice-cream; stores. 10. Jewelry stores. Words struck through are deleted; words nd~ are added, j 11. Laundric~ sc!f scrvicc only; ~eather goods; legitimate theaters; liquor stores; locksmiths, ]2. Marinas; markets - food; markets - meat; medical offices and clinics; millinery shops; motels and hotels; motion picture theaters; museums; music stores; mini warehouses and storage facilities; minor automobile repair work. 13. New car dealership - outside display permitted; news stores. ";~~' ~..~- (4 ...... ~ ...... ;~ ~ 14. Office - general; office supply stores. 15. Paint and wallpaper stores; pet shops; pet supply shops; photographic equipment stores; pottery stores; printing; publishing and mimeograph services shops; private -~..~- fin ..... ~ .... %;irk ~.- professional offices. 16. Radio and television sales and services; radic station (offices and studios), and auxiliary transmit'=e.-s and receiving equipment, but not principal transmission tower; research and design labs; rest homes; restaurants - including drive-in or fast food restaurants (in accordance with the standards of Sccticn 8.]! cf thc Zoning Ordinancc Section 2.6.10 of the Land Development Code). 17. Shoe Repair; shoe stores; shopping centers; souvenir stores; stationery stores; supermarkets and sanatoriums. 18. Tailor shops; taxidermists; tile sales - ceramic tile; tobacco shops; toy shops; tropical fish stores. 19. Upholstery shops. 20. Variety stores; vehicle rental - automobiles only; veterinarian offices and clinics - no outside kennels. 21. Watch and precision instrument repair shops. 22. Any other commercial use of professional service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Zcning Development Services Director determines to be compatible with the above uses. SECTION THREE: AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION Paragraphs H entitled "Parking" and J entitled "Landscape Buffer" of Subsection 4.4 entitled "Development Regulations" of Section IV entitled "General Development Regulations" of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (Ordinance No. 89-62, as amended), is hereby amended to read as follows: H. Parking: The same as the standards of the Collier County Zoning Ordina,.-~ee Land Development Code in effect at the time of application for permits. Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. 12B 2. J. Landscape Buffer: A ten (10) foot landscaped buffer shall be constructed along the northern section of the property south of the access road as depicted of the Conceptual PUD Master Plan. If commercial zoning is approved on the tract to the east at the time development permits are requested, the buffer shall not be required adjacent to said con%mercially zoned tract. Any landscaping buffer will be required in accordance with the standards of ~ Section 2.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of County, Florida, this ~,~/ day of ~ 1998. Collier ATTESt: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY f/$usan/$hoppes at Santa Ba£bara PUD Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 98-22 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 24th day of March, 1998, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 26th day of Mar~h, 1998. DWIGHT E. BROCK ": ' ~ ~:" Clerk of Courts andTC~rk Ex-officio to Board'..of Cou~ . ,, ~~nc~:~kO!:'"'~ii.:.'...' ..... ~'.' " COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IIEARINGS To: Clerk to thc Board: Plca~ place the following as XXX Normal legal Advcniscmcnt [] Other: (Display Adv.. location, crc.) Petition No. (If none. give brief de~fipdon): R-97-12 Petitioner: (Name & Address): Shanc & Cindi Mcln~osh, 141 Fifth Street N., Naples, ~ 34102 Name & Add.ss of any ~n(s) to ~ nolifi~ ~ Clerk's Offi~: (If more space is needed, at=ch ~parale sh~t) H~dng ~forc ~ BCC BZA ~hcr N~'spa~r(s) Io ~ u~: (Complclc only if im~nanl): ~ Naples Daily News Olhcr ~ ~gally R~ui~ Pro~ Text: (Include lc~l dc~ption & common I~tion & Si~: Pcfilion No. R-97-12, Shanc and Cindi Mcln~h, ~u~ a rezone fro~ RSF~ lo C-~r a profc~ional office building for pro~ l~ted on G~lctle Road ~tw~n 13~ Avenue Nonl and 14~ Avenue North, l~t~ in S~ion 34, Tos~ship 49 Soulh, ~nge 25 Easl, Collier Counm, ~ofi~, consi~ing of.68 Companion ~tition(s), if any & pro~ h~fing D~s Petition Fcc include ~dvcnising cost? ~cs ~ No If Yes, what account should ~ charg~ for advertising co~: 113-138323~49110 R~4cwcd by: FO ~ ~ O 0 ~ ~ ! Approved by: Di~Ssion Hind )' ' Date Coun~ Mamger Date List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure lhat any necessary legal rtwiew, or reque for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: !ii11111111111111111111111111111111111111111i111111111111111111 12B 3 February 2, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition R-97-12 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, March 8, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 800551 12B } NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 9534N BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON GOODLETTE ROAD BETWEEN 13TH AVENUE NORTH AND 14TH AVENUE NORTH IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM RSF-4 TO C-1 FOR A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING; PROVIDING FOR STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION STIPULATIONS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition R-97-12, Shane and Cindi McIntosh, requesting a rezone from RSF-4 to C-1 for a professional office building for property located on Goodlette Road between 13th Avenue North and 14th Avenue North, consisting of .68 acres. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COM~4ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 12B 3 February 2, 1998 Shane & Cindi McIntosh 141 Fifth Street North Naples, FL 34102 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition R-97-12 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 12B } ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 9534N BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED ON GOODLETTE ROAD BETWEEN 13TM AVE NORTH AND 14TM AVENUE NORTH IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM RSF-4 TO C-1 FOR A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING; PROVIDING FOR STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION STIPULATIONS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Shane and Cindi McIntosh petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property as more particularly described by Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, and located in Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from RSF-4 to C-1 and the Official Zoning Atlas Map Number 9534N, as described in Ordinance 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code is hereby amended accordingly. The herein described real property is the same for which the rezone is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. An appropriate portion of native vegetation shall be retained on site as required in Section 3.9.5.5.4. Collier County Land Development Code. 2. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance (exotic free) plan for the site, with emphasis on areas of retained native vegetation, shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 12B SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ., 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BARBARA B. BERRY, Chairman ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Marjo~/e M. Studeht Assistant County Attorney LEGAL DESCRIPTION WEST 30 FEET OF LOT 16 & 21, ALL OF LOT 17 & 20,AND EAST 20 FEET OF LOT S 18 & 19, GORDON RIVER HOMES IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA EXHIBIT "A" 128 #ap[es I)atl.7' #evb Haptes, FL 339~0 Affidavit of PubLication Naptes Deity Ne~a BOARD OF COUNTY COflH]SS[OflERS ATTN: NANCY SALOGUB PO BOX /,12016 NOlqC~ OF INTENT TO CONS~ NAPLES FL ~101-~016 ~DINA~ thor on TUESDAY, ~, ~d FI~, A~ REFERENCE: ~1230 ~551 ~, 3~1 E~t T~ 57653891 ~TICE OF INTENT TO State of F(ortda ~e. The C~nty of CoLLier ~11 c~m~e ~. The fl~e M M ~e Before the u~ersign~ nut,ri[y, ~rs~atty ~ ~l~e ~ a~ear~ A~e~a Bryant, ~ ~ oath says that she AN ORDINANCE serves as Assistant Secretary of the Nap[es DaiSy AMENDING ORDI. NANCE NUMBER Slavs, a daily n~spaper ~btlshed at Naptes~ tn e1.102. ~ Cot[tar C~nty, Ftor~da: that the attach~ c~ COUNTY LAND VELOPMENT CODE of adverttst~ ~as ~btlsh~ in said n~s~e ~ ~CN ESTABLISHED dates [tst~. T~ COMPRE~NSI~ ZONING REGULA- Affiant furthe~ says that the ~atd Nap[es Oat[y T~ONS Fffi T~ UNIN- N~S is a n~s~per ~b[tsh~ at Naptes, tn said CORPORATEO AREA ~ C~L~R C~NTY, ColLier C~ty, F[ortda, a~ that the said FL~IOA BY ~ENO- n~spaper has heretofore ~ c~ttn~us[y lNG THE OFFICIAL ZONING A~AS ~ ~b[Jsh~ tn said CoLlier C~ty~ Ftorida~ each NUMBER 9534N BY day a~ has been enter~ as sec~ c[ass ~t[ ~ANGING T~ ZON- ING CLASSIFICATION ~tter at the ~st office in Nap[es, tn said OF ~ ~REIN CoLlier C~nty, Florida, for a ~rt~ of 1 yeae ~D REAL ~. ERTY LOCATED ON next prec~ing the first ~[icatt~ of the OOOOLETTE ROAD attach~ c~y of adverttse~t; e~ affiant ~EN 13~ A~- NUE N~ A~ 14TH furthe~ says that she has neither ~td ~e AVENUE NORTIt IN proats~ any pers~ fire or c~rat~ a~ ~CTION 34. TOWN. dJsc~nt~ rebate~ c~tsst~ or ref~ foe the 2S EAST, COLLIER put,se of securing this ~verttsee~t fo~ COUNTY_ FLORIDA, FROM R~.4 TO C.I publication in the said n~s~per. F~ A ~E~ONAC OFFICE BUILDING; PROVIDING FOR PUBLZSHED ON: 03/~ STAFF A~ ~AN~NG COMM~S~ON TIONS: AND aY ~ V~ING AN EFFECT~ DA~ AD SPACE: 98.~ ~NCH s~ ~ ~11~ Signature of Affiant ~ (~ ~c ~,'t ]Av~e S~rn to a~ SubscrJb~ before me this /C~ day of 7.,~% 1 me ~ol~e f~ ~. ' ' ~ All I~ ~ .// ~ ~d ~ll n~ a re- pe~mnlng ~ereto ~e ~ O v~m~ ~ ~, ~h r~d ~ls~ BOARD OF COUNTY L cOrridOrS cOLLIER COUNTY, BARBARA B. BERRY, .. 12B ORDINANCE NO. 98- 23 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 9534N BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED ON GOODLETTE ROAD BETWEEN 13TM AVE NORTH AND 14TM AVENUE NORTH IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM RSF-4 TO C-1 FOR A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING; PROVIDING FOR STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION STIPULATIONS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Shane and Cindi McIntosh petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property as more particularly described by Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, and located in Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from RSF-4 to C-1 and the Official Zoning Atlas Map Number 9534N, as described in Ordinance 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code is hereby amended accordingly. The herein described real property is the same for which the rezone is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. An appropriate portion of native vegetation shall be retained on site as required in Section 3.9.5.5.4. Collier County Land Development Code. 2. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance (exotic free) plan for the site, with emphasis on areas of retained native vegetation, shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. SECTION This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ~,~f~ day of BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BAR~k~A B-.' BERRY,~ Chai~an~ ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ~pp~ved as L'o Form and Legal Sufficiency: ~arjo~e ~, S~udent ~ssis~an~ CounLy 12B 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION WEST 30 FEET OF LOT 16 & 2 I, ALL OF LOT ! 7 & 20,AND EAST 20 FEET OF LOT S i 8 & 19, GORDON RIVER HOMES IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA EXHIBIT "A" 12B STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 98-23 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 24th day of March, 1998, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 26th day of March, 1998. DWIGHT E. BROCK ...' ......... Clerk of Courts an~.'~.'~erk ' Ex-officio to Board Deputy Clerk '' .. / Depreciation Detail 1996 ' I Form 4562 DOMENICO & ANGELA GADALETA 265-55-5696 Statement Su~m,,,o~,c~4,v"SCHEDULE E # I 'NAPLES~ FLORI6A DescHp~o~ Date Acqul~e~ Depreciation Asset ~ { Bus % Metho~Ife ~asls/Ad~ustment Sec 179~and Prior Current ;OLF ~NGE · 01/05/91 SL '1 [00.00 31.5 yr '~OT~) tqq~ ~l~r,.~, , Basis 179 exp** Depreclatlon P6or ~ Current Buslness or actlvil~ total ~, ,. . '~se~ s~d ** C~renl ~ear Section 179 expense only ~ Assets Removed FrOm Service ' DEPRECIATION SC#EDULE BY DIV~SIOII For the Fllcat Ye.r through 09130197 Federat $chedut e Sec179 Prior Yr Current Annuat Depr Num Description Date S¥c Hethod Lf Cost Bonus Accum Oep Year Oep Net Book Cur Per O0001r PAVING 12/12/90 HREAL N 31.5 850 0 156 17 677 0 O0002r FENCE 01/21/91HREAL N 31.5 869 0 160 18 691 0 O00O3r FENCE 02/22/91HREAL N 31.5 1,001 0 180 20 801 0 O000Gr LANDSCAPING - PLANTS, ET 05/01/92 MREAL N 31.5 19,339 0 2,686 38& 16,269 0 20 - BUILDINGS/LEASEHOLDS 22,059 0 3,182 &39 18,~38 0 O0001r GRASS HATS 01/01/91HACRS 5 5 785 0 785 0 0 0 O0002r #ATS giT# INSERT 01/01/91HACRS 5 5 67& 0 67& 0 0 0 O0003r 10w IALL PICKER 01/01/91NACRS. 5 5 1,841 0 1,841 0 0 0 O0004r ~AND BALL PICKER 01/01/91 ~ACRS 5 5 35& 0 354 0 0 0 O0005r BLUE GRASS KATB 01/01/91RACRS 5 5 1,085 0 1,085 0 0 0 O0006r #IBC SHALL EOUIP~ENT 01/01/91NACRS 5 5 2,171 0 2,171 0 0 0 O0007r RANGE SERVANT BALL #AC# 01/01/91 #ACRS 5 5 5,645 0 5,645 0 0 0 O0008r GALLERY FURNITURE 01/01/91 ~ACRS 7 7 283 0 244 13 26 0 O0009r BENCHES 01/01/91MACRS 7 7 339 0 292 15 32 0 O0010r GOLF CLUBS 01/01/91 #ACRS 5 5 1,910 0 1,910 0 0 0 00011r SIGNS 02/08/91HACRS 5 5 180 0 180 0 0 0 00012r 5 MATS - TAPCO 02/27/91 ~ACRS 5 5 1,157 0 1,157 0 0 0 00014r 28' 8 NP MOWER 01/02/91MACRS 5 5 1,855 0 1,855 0 0 0 00016r HATS - UITTE~ 06/30/91HACRS 5 5 615 0 615 0 0 O 00017r #IBC EOUIP#ENT 07/30/91 ~ACRS 5 5 226 0 226 0 0 0 00018r TRACTOR 12/01/90 #ACRS 5 5 15,129 0 15,129 0 0 0 00019r VATER PU~P 11/1B/92 #ACRS 5 5 300 0 2~8 18 3& 0 O0020r #IBC SHALL EOUIPNENT 09/30/95 MACRS 5 5 1,852 0 963 178 711 0 SO * PRODUCTION EQUIPHENT 36,401 0 35,374 224 8O3 0 DIVISION O0 TO~AL 58,460 0 38,556 663 19,241 0 AGENDA ITEM 7-F 128 5 MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLAN~TNG COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1997 RE: PETITION NO: PUD-S7-31 (3), GADALETA OWNER/AGENT: Agent: Timothy W. Ferguson 2272 Airport Road S., Suite 209 Naples, Florida 34112 and Dominic Gadaleta 572 - 107"' Avenue N. Naples, Florida 34108 Owner: SJG Land trust 16979 Old U.S. 41 Naples, Florida 34110 Beneficiaries - William R. Shaw, Alan W. Johnson, and James Goldies REQUESTED ACTION: This petition is in response to the requirements of Section 2.7.3.4 (Sunsetting) of the LDC, Resolution 97-134 directing that an application be filed to repeal and to adopt a new PUD for the property known as the Gadaleta PUD. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The property is located on the west side of Old U.S. 41 North immediately contiguous to the Lee County boundary line. (See location map following page). 129-5 PURPOSE/DESCRI PTION OF PROJECT: The Gadaleta PUD is a mixed use PUD, which authorizes two (2) acres of C-2 Commercial type uses, eighty-eight dwelling units, and a temporary golf driving range. This PUD became subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.4 (i.e. sunsetting) on October 30, 1996. On February 18, 1997 the BCC directed the owner/entity to submit an amended PUD by August 18, 1997. While staff received a draft amendment PUD from the agent for Mr. & Mrs. Gadaleta, nevertheless, this draft was for discussion purposes only, and was not formally submitted as a petition. On September 8, 1997 staff advised the agent of perceived deficiencies in the draft PUD. On November 6, 1997 a petition for readopting a new PUD was submitted together with the required fee. The petitioner has formally protested the payment of the petition fee. Prior to its "PUD" Planned Unit Development status the land area comprising the Gadaleta PUD was zoned RMF-6 (10.5 ac.), "A" rural Agricultural (6.78 ac.) and C-2 (two (2) acres). The area lies within the urban residential designated area of the FLUE, while the density rating system currently authorizes a denfity no greater than t,hree (2) dwelling units per acre. At the time of zoning re-evaluation the Gadaleta PUD retained its zoning status as a PUD with authorization to construct eighty-eight dwelling units of which six (6) were to be affordable, two (2) acres of Commercial (C-2) and a temporary golf driving range. The reason for the six (6) affordable housing un/ts is unknown while the temporary driving range was tied to a condition that operation as a driving range cease as soon as a public source of sewer and water facilities became available. Again the logic for this condition is unknown, inasmuch, as a driving range is a conditionally authorized use in the agricultural district, and has traditionally in such locations been considered a preferred use. The PUD submitted with this application provides for eighty-eight (88) dwelling units, and a two acre tract in which commercial uses are requested, some of which are more intensive than the current C-2 uses that are allowed. A provision is also made to convert the commercial tract to residential at the conversion formula allowed by the density rating system of sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre. The revised PUD would allow the golf driving range as a permanent use on the residential tract. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Existing: The property is currently being used as a golf driving range with attendant accessory facilities. The property is zoned PUD. Surrounding: North - To the north lies the area of Lee County and the Spanish Wells residential/golf course community. The contiguous land, is however, undeveloped at this point in time. East - To the east lies Old U.S. 41, and industrial use areas. The land along the east side of Old U.S. 41 N. is zoned Industrial. 2 5 South - To thc south the land is used as a Retail Nursery, a conditionally approved use. The land is zoned "A" Rural Agricultural. West- To the west lies the development known as Sterling Oaks a mixed residential community. The land is zoned PUD (Residential). GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: The property is located within the urban residential designated area on the FLUE Map. Consistency determinations are as follows: Land Use and Density Land Use: To the extent that a mixed residential development is proposed on 17.28 acres of the'land' area this use is consistent with the urban residential designation. Similarly, a golf driving range is an allowable use in the urban residential area, albeit through a conditional use. The Commercial tract is technically inconsistent with the FLUE, however, by specific action of the Board of County Commissioners two (2) acres of C-2 uses was approved much as would have been the case under the zoning Reevaluation Program. It is assumed that one of the purposes of the sunsetting provisions, Section 2.7.3.4 of the LDC is to re-evaluate PUD's whose land uses are no longer technically consistent with the FLUE except as may be provided for commercial under criteria/infill determinations. .Densi _ty Technically, the density is inconsistent with the provisions of the density rating system. The density rating system provides for a density not to exceed three (3) dwelling units per acre. The current PUD allows eighty-eight (88) dwelling units ofwhich six (6) were to be affordable. The original zoning of the property prior to Ordinance 88-50 which rezoned the property to "PUD", was RMF-6 on 10..5 acres, and "A" on 6.78 acres. These districts would have cumulatively allowed eighty-three (83) dwelling units (i.e. 10.5 x 6 + 6.78 x 3). Under the ZRO program the approved PUD development strategy (i.e. 8S du's + temF. golf driving range + 2 acres of commc,'ciaI) was determined acceptable based on compatibility criteria, and subsequent Bec decision to restore the two (2) acre commercial site due to an omission to an earlier amendment to the Gadaleta PUD. The density rating system currently still provides that inconsistent commercial zoning may be converted to residential for residential density not to exceed sixteen (16) dwelling unit~ per acre. The conversion density plus the original entitlement would produce a density of one hundred and fifteen (115) dwelling units for a density of $.96 dwelling units per acre. In view of the ZRO action we have to conclude that the initially approved eighty-eight (88) dwelling units is consistent with the FLUE without prejudice to the BCC'$ ability to modify this level of development as a function of an action pursuant to Section 2.7.3.4. of the LDC (sunsetting provisions). Additionally, the BCC may act as it chooses relative to the number of dwelling units to apply to the two (2) acre commercial tract. As a result, the following development scenario's are in the opinion of staff technically consistent with the FLUE to the GMP, notwithstanding any actions which may be taken by the petitioner should the current level of development be reduced: Currently Approved With Proposed Literal Application of Literal Application of Density & Intensity Amendment FLUE Based on FLUE For New Density Rating application System At Time of Notwithstanding Approval ZRO 88 dwelling units 2 88 dwelling units + 83 dwelling units & 17.3acx3=52& acres (C-2 Comm.) 32 du's for 32 du's for up to 32 du's for Temp. Driving R~nge conversion or 2 acresconversion and commercial :ract of Comm. And Permanent Golf permanent Golf Range Driving Range TOTAL DWELLING UNITS 120 du's 115 du's up to 84 du's Commercial Intensity - The commercial uses proposed by the revised PUD exceed those currently authorized under the C-2 zoning classification, and therefore are inconsistent with provisions of the FLUE that deal with non-conforming or inconsistent commercial zoning. The existing ZRO approved C-2 zoning is also technically inconsistent with the FLUE, and does not qualify for commercial zoning under commercial in-fill or under criteria. TeE - The AADT resulting from any of the development scenarios, will not exceed the significance test (5% of the LOS "C" design capacity) on Old US-41 within the project's radius of development influence (RDI). As a result, this petition is consistent with Policies 5.1 and 5.2 of the Traffic Circulation Element (TCE). The TCE lists Old US-41 as a 2 lane road' fronting the project. The current traffic count for this segment is 9,415 AADT which results in LOS "C" operation. It should be noted that the level of service on this segment is not projected to fall below it's adopted LOS "D" standard within the next five years. As a result, no road improvements to this segment are required in order to meet concurrency requirements. Since this petition will not lower the level of service, it complies with Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of the TCE and is therefore consistent with the GMP. Recreation And Open Space: This element has application only with respect to policies relative to enhancing the amount of open space on a project by project bases as required by provisions of the Land Development Code. The LDC requires mixed use projects to provide thirty (30) percent of its area to be allocated for purposes qualifying as open space. It is not always possible to discem this on projects which do not have jurisdictional wetlands (i.e. Preserves) identified on the Mater Plan as in this petition. Nevertheless, general provision statements require compliance with applicable 4 provisions of the LDC where the PUD lacks the definition to show consistency with "open space" preservation or enhancement features. This provision in such cases is therefore involved at subsequent development approval actions such as platting or site development applications. The provision of recreation services is generally a County responsibility which is given geographic specificity on the bases of identified needs, and available monies from impact fees. Conservation And coastal Management Element: Provisions contained within the development commitments section of the PUD ensure that the CCME policies will be achieved at the time of subsequent development approval actions. Water. Sewer and ~;t0rm Water Management: Appropriate stipulations have been crafte.q and included within the PUD requiring development (except for interim land uses) to connect to the County's sewer and water system. The project will be designed according to LDC requirements for storm water management. During the site development plan approval process the project will be required to be consistent v,'ith all relevant provisions of the LDC. HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staffs analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required. EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE, The subject petition has been reviewed by the appropriate staff responsible for oversight related to the above referenced areas of critical concern. This primarily includes a review by the Community Development environmental and engineering staff, and the Transportation Services Department staff. This petition was administratively reviewed on behalf of the EAB. Recommendations are included in the Development commitments section of the PUD that pertains to those jurisdictions staff recommendations required to assure that development as it proceeds will be consistent v.'ith applicable LDC requirements. ANALYSIS/EVALUATIONS: This petition is in response to the requirements of Section 2.7.3.4 (Sunsetting) wherein the BCC directed the owner entity of the subject property to file a petition to amend the development order (Gadaleta PUD, Ordinance No. 88-50 as amended) within six (6) months of the date the Section 2.7.3.4 action came before the BCC. Although this takes the form of a rezone from "PUD" to "PUD" we do not technically consider this to be a rezoning action, and therefore the findings for PUD rezones and standard rezones were not made, inasmuch as these would have been part of the original PUD zoning actions. 5 The action to require the owner entity to file a petition to update the Gadaleta PUD was based on the finding that the current PUD regulations were substantially deficient in providing development regulations reflecting current LDC requirements and to provide an opportunity to review the authorized land uses and their density and intensity relationships. Notwithstanding the decision to retain the originally authorized development strategy under ZRO procedures, and the corrective decision of the BCC regarding a two (2) acre C-2 tract, the amount of residential development (i.e. 88 dwelling units), and the commercial tract are technically inconsistent with requirements of the FLUE. As indicated under the discussion of consistency with the FLUE to the GMP, the BCC has the discretion to do the following: (i) Allow the C-2, two (2) acre designation to be retained or require its deletion. (ii) Allow an alternative use of the C-2, two (2) acre tract for residential use at a density of up to 16 dwelling units per acre. (iii) Determine the number ofunits to be allowed if it is decided to allow an either or development scenario of the C-2, 2 acre parcel. (iv) Determine the number of dwelling units to be allowed on the currently designated residential tract (i.e. 17.28 acres). This number can be as high as eight-eight (88) dwelling units as currently authorized, or as Iow as fifty-three (53) dwelling units based on the density rating system as applied to 17.28 acres and current limitation of density rating system. (v) Determine if recreational uses ofthe property should be allowed as a permitted use (i.e. now allowed as a temporary use). The relationship of the Gadaleta PUD to nearby housing developments advises that a portion of the Sterling Oaks PUD is being developed with two-family housing contiguous to the Gadaleta PUD. Given the fact that this property is platted (i.e. Wildcat Cove) we can determine the density that will come about on the platted acreage, which we estimate to be 8.5 dwelling units per acre. ~'l~,e Arbor Lake PUD, immediately south of the Gadaleta PUD is approved for 6.48 dwelling units per acre, while further south at the MeadowBrook Estates PUD a residential project is under development at 8.95 dwelling units per acre. We do not know what type of housing is to be constructed on the portion of Spanish Wells in Lee County which is currently vacant. Spanish Wells is a mixed residential community, and given the location of the vacant property and nearby land use characteristics a multiple family product is the most likely market response to the vacant land lying north of the Gadaleta PUD. Given these land use relationships it is apparent that the actual density of housing within the near environs of the Gadaleta PUD are not dissimilar to that which is being requested (i.e. 5 du's/ac, or 6.2 du's/ac, with commercial conversion). One method for determining an equitable solution would be to acknowledge the current development authorization, namely, eighty-eight (88) dwelling units, and two (2) acres of C-2 commercial uses, 6 but lo require the optional use of the C-2 tract for residential purposes be limited lo ten (I0) dwelling units per acre for which there is some precedent, thereby, allowing 108 dwelling units on the 19.3 acres of land (i.e. 5.6 du's/ac.). The petitioners request lo allow a golf driving range as a permanent optional use of the property is seen as having no negative effect on the area, and indeed in some respects is probably a preferred use. Staff does not find any of the land uses incompatible with adjacent properties and opines that this extends lo the matter of density. Nevertheless, one must appreciate that the objective of Section 2.7.3.4 (i.e. Sunsetting Process) was to re-evaluate PUD zoning approvals, as a consequence of their inactivity for a period of five (5) years, for the purpose of providing an opportunity lo address land uses which are inconsistent or otherwise inconsistent with current LDC requirements. The land use inconsistency is the commercial tract. The PUD provides for its retention and leaves to the discretion of the owner whether or not they winh to convert this land to residential uses at sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre, the maximum allowed by the density rating system. Technically, thc current authorized density is inconsistent at 5.08 dwelling units per acre, not withstanding its ZRO approval for retention. In this regard it is worth noting that the approved density is similar to densities allowed on nearby properties. The revised PUD references the land Development Code for application of all development standards as they apply to the type of housing to be constructed, and the ,,','ay the land is to be developed (i.e. fee simple lots/tracts or condominium plat). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Planning commission recommend conditional approval of Petition PUD-87- 31(3) being a petition to amend the Gadaleta PUD by replacing same with a new PUD. Conditions for approval are as follows: (i) That the provision for any commercial zoning be deleted. (ii) That a commercial conversion :lensity often (10) dwelling unitq pe~ acre for two (2) acre..; of commercial be allowed for a total number of twenty (20) dwelling units. (iii) That a total of eight-three (83) dwelling units be approved for the balance of the property (i.e. 17.28 ac.) based on the conclusion that there was no bases in fact to allow six (6) dwelling units as affordable housing. (iv) That a golf driving range and accessory and incidental golf practice facilities and related management services be approved as an alternative principal use. 7 Pk~P D : RO~IALD F. DATE CHIEF PLANNER REVIEWED BY: OI~RT J. MULHERE, AICP DATE CUKR~NT PLANNING MANAGER DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP DATE CENT A. CAUTERO, AICP, ADMINISTRATOR DATE COMMUNITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS. Petition Number PUD-87-31 (3) StaffReport for January 15, 1998 CCPC meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN PUD-87-3 ! (3) STAFF REPORT/md 1997 Item %832 RIISOI/71~(H~ 97-134, AFFECTING ORD~IANCE 88-50 ALSO KNOWN AS THE GADAT.~TA 'Item 8(A)(21, staff review and recommendations relative ' ' tO Ordinance 88-50 which is knOwn as the Gadaleta PUD' and I prObablymisprOnOuncedMR. MULHERE:that'No.' You -- You got that right. CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: All right! I ..:. . · MR MULHERE: Mr Chairman, Bob Mulhere, current i,'~:'!.":plann£ng manager. Mr. Nine, who prepared this report, is on his way ."."".up. Here he is right here. ?'" CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: Tie over his shoulder, jacket in one "¢. arm. .....· :~: MR. MULHERE'. He'll be right up. i4~}'... CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: At least you remembered your jacket, '~.'"' Ron. Good morning, Mr. Nine. [>~..' MR. NINO: Good morning. I apologize for being tardy. ~.... CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: That will be one -- one demerit. ~;.'· MR. NINO: I can't afford any of those. 15!/'' .The-Gadaleta PUD is a PUD which you've recently had a t~' .considerable amount of exposure to. As a matter of fact, only recently you agreed to restore a piece of commercial property to that .::~ . PUD. Staff in reviewing the PUD, as indicated in our executive ..~ .... summary, advises you that the commercial zoning is inconsistent with ~}"i"i.'Y'"the~'future land use element, and for that reason alone we would ~,.,... i ~'~'~' recommend that the petitioner return in six months with an amendment '..... to the -- to that petition. l~i:,. .However, as we indicated, there are a number of other ~-.~[i.matters that are -- that are inconsistent with today's requirements. The ~ is -- is dated by our standards, and we -- we think this i~.~, opportunity ought to be taken to bring this PUD into -- into -- up to today's standards. However, in the process we -- we think it is advisable .. to. give the petitioner some direction as to what they might expect in .~he..way of favorable consideration from this board, and staff has -- .... has' recommended that -- that the revised ~D include a provision for !~:' :eliminating the C-2 commerc£al and, in lieu thereof, grantina them l~;5'...', the -- the dens~ty that is autho~zedby the.future land use element ~k!'i.t'.':' for conversion of commercial zoning that is ~nconsistent with the ~UD ~.f..... · , ' ~ · , · l~,..' And -- and wi,h that, that ~s our recommendation, that ~'~¢ the petitioner be advised to return in six months with an amended PUD ~' and that you indicate that it is appropriate for that document to Page 7 12B ~..;.>: . . ~.~.,::i'~.' February 25, 1997 .... i'<~'properties,· found to be appropriate for the 88 dwelling..units. The '~:~ · .'C-2 was a mistake -- ,~,=. · 'CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: Okay. ~,,. , I~R. NINO: -- on our part. So the C-2 in all --. quite .... · - ~ frankly, never -- was never the subject of the zoning reevaluation ?'.~,.. ',~etermina t ion. ,,,.. ,,. CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: And this is the C-2 that by "'"" ..crivener's e.rror some error was -- ',~o-, · ". ....MR.. NINO. Exactly. A" ; ' ?<' ;'I:"".; CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: -- left out and just put back ~n , ~." .- pre_~viouNly~thi, s 'year -- · ,' '; .-.'": 'MR. ' NINO. Yes. l~.,. CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: -- and now we're telling them to come ,~.~,~:. back -- I?.'. ~' ~R. NINO: Yes. ...... .,,... . CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: -- and remove it. 1 ~?'.'3 ' ' MR. NINO: Exactly. Exactly. ~_~z ..... -,..-.. 'CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: Did we tell them that when they came ~,.~.,:,., in earlier this year, that that was in all -- · '~I~~';'~': .... ' MR'. NINO: No, we.didn't No, we didn't. ...,:-', j~,: CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: It seems we could have avoided that I[~?;?%Z.,.m~.dd!e 'step, but I guess that's -- I~?.,~'[ .:;~. :..?" MR'.' NINO: Well -- I~:''!,'. '". ': ~'~' CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: -- water under the bridge. I~.~, . ..,2.-L~,~P~....N,I~NO: -- they w.anted t_o be made whole. And, quite ,~..'- . .'~-.~,-y, mr. ~'erguson is here I · ~ ~u.._~ ...... ' . . . ' · -- ~ -- ~ ~n~ ~ ~rllS poln~ in ~.f.<'- ~.time the petitioner actually prefers that the - ~;/..'-"..un~t~ '~,~.~w, C 2 be converted to 16 "C' '' -~i----.--' ~- .... "~' ---- - ~','.'~',.~'?.:,h :.CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: Well, let me ask .? ,~'iT,"."':,-" .... MR~. NINO: -- but I'll lear -- ~ ,..... ~ e that for -- ~.,~ ¢,~...~ ,' . .CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: -- questions for -- ~,~ :i.'.'~ >.i.'', ., MR.' NINO: -- Mr. Ferguson to address. ,~v.~ :" · ,Seeing none, Mr. Ferguson, I believe is th . ,,.,, .. . , e petitioner !~,: . . MR. FERGUSON: Good morning, Mr. IIF~,~;..'~' . ~.~.~;ners. '£'~m Ferguson for the rec ~.',.'~ '~Ga ord on behalf of Dominic IF..~>.. . :. daleta,, the Gadaleta PUD. Th,. -- The C-2 was ~,~.' .'? .'. nadvertently not even considered when the zonin re ' "% · "ordi . . g evaluation ~, . nance was -- was being considered -- when the property was being ~%~."' '.tconsidered for exemption from the zoning reevaluation, and.that's kind ]~.~'.~, o£ problematic. The C-2 was taken out of the PUD a scr , ~' "'~rro by lvener s ~ ,.,.. .... ~ ,, r as .well because what had ha~ened w-- ~ ....... -" ' "· - . . ~-~' · ~ ~= ~=rSOI1 WhO was [4F~. '"..representing the petitioner at the txme gave a new propert ,5,..;.,. . description that inadvertently cut the C-2 out. We certainYly believe ~i'::i~t',. .that. the PUD as a whole is poorly written and certain1 ' ~'j.. ~'.addressed so we will be y needs to be ....,,. coming back. We would lik ~-~. densit e to see some ~.'.31~,.~we?come .back, but certainly we would hope tha.~ the -- the board wo~d .i,~.'-.'~{~. y, and we think we may have some alternatives for the C-2 wh ~?& '3 be 'able to give us the 16-units-per-acre denslty and the 88 units as ~.~i, i= exists now. · -~,. Page 8 ~ '.~','..'.. February 25, 1997 There also is some consideration of a LCF that we may want to bring back before the board if -- if ~hat's appropriate, and we're just looking for any -- any guidance that the board has at this time. CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: The -- It was always clear to your client that there was C-2 zqning on the property; is that correct? MI{. FERGUSON: It's always been clear to my client. The client's been running the golf range that exists there for some time. I would suggest to the board that the C-2 is -- is probably -- could probably be maintained on that property. We have industrial -- I'll note for the record that right across the street is -- is industrial, you know. To -- To the west, we have seven units an acre. Straight across the street, we have industrial. So C-2 is -- is the next step down from industrial. It's a nice buffer. But, you know, we believe that C-2 probably isn't the highest and best use for the property, so we're looking to change that use and we're just looking that the board would keep our -- our densities there. CHAIRMAN ~%NCOCK: Well, I guess if you're -- if you're looking for a -- a feel, obviously the specific discussions regarding density modification to the PUD would occur when this item comes back before us, but my preference in that area, 16 units per acre versus C-2,','.is':for C-2. I -- I'm not looking to maximize residential densities on Old U.S. 41~ I'm -- I'm sensing some agreement here. So, you know, as this comes back, you may want to consider compatible residential densities, or if it's an A -- if it's a -- what's now called an ALF by the State of Florida, you may want to look at some past petitions that have come through and how those decisions have been made by this board for framing what you think is the highest and best use, but I -- I, for one, am not -- not interested in 16 units an acre in that area. I just don't think it -- it fits. I -- the C-2'-- I.%ve,.used.that.driving range. I think it -- it works pretty well, MR. FERGUSON: Well, just for purposes of clarification, that would be 16 units averaged over the whole. We would be talking about 115 units for the entire parcel which is well within -- You've got the Akbour Lake Club, or whatever that is, PUD just to the west which is seven units per acre, and it would end up being something very similar to that so -- but -- but if you're going on the record saying you'd rather see C-2, we'll take that into consideration. CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: I think I'd rather see something less than 16 units an acre as a conversion because you had the opportunity for -- MR. FERGUSON: That's only for 2 acres. CHAIRMAN HANCOCK: I understand that, but you had the opl)ortunityunder ZRO to go for that voluntary conversion and request that from the board. The property owner did not do that at that time. So, you know, I -- I think you've committed to a path there,~ and -- and I -- I don't want to go back and -- and undo that, personally, but that's the closest thing that I can give you to direction myself. COM~ISSIONER CONSTANTINE: I agree. CHAI~4AN HANCOCK: Any further comments from the board? Page 9 12B 5 February 25, 1997 MR. FERGUSON: Thank you. CHAI~HANCOCK: Thank you, Mr. Ferguson. Are there any speakers, Mr. McNees? MR. MCNEES: No, sir. CHAIRMAN HANCOCK= Okay. Might as well entertain a mo~ion. COMMISSIONER NORRIS: Motion to approve staff's recon~en~ation. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Second. CHAXRM~N HANCOCK~ Motion and a second. Any discussion? All those in favor signify, by saying aye. Opposed? (No response) CHAI~ HANCOCK: Seeing none, we'l! see this Item back. Thank you. Page 10 12B 5 OFFICIAL RECEIPT PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPLICANT ADDRES~ ..... - ACCOUNT NO, AMOUNT CODE DESCRIIq'ION ACCOUNT NO. AMOUNT CODE DESCRIPTION 34~[$g401.,34~{4 $ 4~ ~F~{ONALPAJ~IMPAC't'~ 11t.131911-321210 $ 73 CONT~ACT. COMI~.LICEH$£ · . .343M,{ $, 47 COMM-P~I~PACTFEE{ 111.131911-321220 $ 74 CONT]tACT. E3CAMFYI,~i~__. ~,&-[$(,41,d~3439)$ $ 43 O~){',G4. PAAXI),,(PACTFEF~NN. 15).1)19QG322,420 $ 75 344..1~4LJ-.3~39)S $ 44 O:)WO,,LPAAKI),(PACTF{~SO.O. II$-131'K~,.$Z24M S ';6 .34&-l$i,414..~.~l $,, 42 O:)K),~PAA{~II,4PACTPEP~E.N. 115.131~CG32.3'KX} S '77 UT'fl..frYR.EVTEW 34&-lS&41{-.MJ~fJ { 30 CO~G,LPAJtKI),(PAC*TFELSS.N 1{3-12{900.323710 S. 71 UT{2.I'rYINS~ON 34~.I.S4417..3L.~t$ $ 31 CG),O4. PA. AKIJK~ACTF'KESUWMA II$'I$I4K:G329'450 S 79 WATEWMGM'r.~ 3$$-{.{&I~O.3(L.~g"J .S.. 41 {.~BJtAJI. YIP,,4PAC]'FEF.5 11)-138'94Xk329~00 S $0 R.O.W.{,i~XAG'T B$113-2098G0 $ 49 OOL,Df~ OATK FD D,,(PA CT {:T~ 113- I ]~,0G. 32~.I:X) S 11 EXCAVATIOh' PE.R MTr ~ .16~,50. $ ~ 5o Jt. OA~D,(PACFFE~ 11)-13fgCG]29XX) S 12 B~6, STI~O{:~$1M~T 13-131~G322110 S _ 51 B{-IXI. PE~J~fT-NAI~E{ 113'131'WX)'~34~0 S 13 DE"V.I'LAN(F~AL) B$ 113-21~00 I ~4 S~C 113-13FK)O. 3412d J S . il]-131900.343930 $ ~6 IY~.'I~E~.ZO~iNO 113-13190~.~12:M S l{ 11~-131~:)O. 343940 $ 57 SPF-~.~-TEM~.ZOI~qO 113-1M9OO.)41210 $ 89 BS 113..2~200 $ 63 EA.S'T N~ F.D I { ~- 13{'K~O.)d1210 S SS ~ B$ { 13-3093~O $ &4 {KAJt~"O IS~ F .I) 1 I].- 131,KG)4 { :M,O S W~ B$ iI$..:~D),4QO { .... LS OOLD~qCL4.TEpD ll$-{~K~G34~t01 $ 9'7 E$S ~ SS 113-20J.~0 $ -,, 6d, BCX"Q'F~ J~CXORY F D 113-I$~J~G~i S S ~ ST ~ B,J 113-30Y7Ct0 S, 6'/ CC)t~LS,CX_L'W FO. 123-131M0,~W~2 S 99 ss ,l~-2max) $ # tA~qOAS S ----------D~.~, 6/.GS/..u??!~,.,~ 1:0041096 111-13~111-; $ 72 While - Customm' Yellow. Finance Pink - IA Gold - File FOR BUILDING IMPROYEMENTS." FS '713.135 1'2B 5 :DATE r, c~F;C..' . .1 ;.. DOMEN I Cb -' f~.~: r~a r~a - ....... ~,,H ~VENUE 'rR- . = ~3-.. ~.; ADDRESS- I6979 OLD ~.S. GEN LOC~T ION-NORT~ , SUBD~V~SION-GaDALETA PUD LEGAL " ~-' ' . dT./c,c~CE. _ ,,'.:' _ COST OF CONSTRUCTIO~- ~45..)00 A-z.~..,~., [~E- 5/25/90 SE~ER- SEPTIC WATER- WELL BASE FLOOD EL- , 5ENCH MARK EL- BENCH MARK LOO- _O,.. The above application has been examined and is hereby approved subject to the payment of $ provided by the Collier County BuilOing,f3~le and Ordinances. , as All work under the approved building permit shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances and additional stipulations mci/or Conditions of PermiL The approved permit expires if work authorized is not commenced within six (6) months from date of issue. The permit fee will be doubled, plus a maximum daily penalty of $500.00 if work is started without an approved permit. The permitee further understands that only licensed contractors may be employed and that the structure shall not be used or occuoh:d until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. . Signature of Contractor "FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE MECHANICS' LIEN LAW CAN RESULT IN W~e - Customer Y~Ilow -ReeordsRoom THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING TWICE o,~ .~,~-,~. FOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTe,.,, 128 5 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICFq 3301 E. TAMIAMI TR. GROWTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FL 33962 (815) 774-8282 A CERTIFIED BLUE CHIP COMMUNITY' June 5, 1990 Domenico and Angela Gadaleta 572 107th Avenue North Naples, Florida 33963 Re: EXM-006-NN for Property Described as the N 530.19 Feet of the N 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Lying Westerly of Old US-41 (SDP-90-32, Gadaleta Driving Range) Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gadaleta: Please be advised the following determination has been made by the Growth Planning Department regarding the above-referenced Exemption application. Though the subject property is deemed inconsistent and unimproved, it is exempted from the Zoning Reevaluation Program contained in the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance 90-23, pursuant to the Exemption granted below: Deter]~ination ~xemption ~equested approved Final Site Development Plan approved on or after January 1, 1988 and prior to the effective date of the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance (Sec. 2.4.2) 1. A determination which grants an exemption shall exempt development only to the extent expressly contained in such exemption provision. 2. An exemptio~ applies to the land and is therefore transferable from owner to owner of the land subject to the exemption. 3. Final Site Development Plans approved on or after January 1, 1988 but prior to the effective date (May 14, 1990) of the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance: 12B .5 'Domenico and Angela Gadaleta .June 5, 1990 Page Two a. Construction authorized by the Final Site Development Plan must commence within the earlier of: (1) two years of original approval of the final site development plan; or (2) January 10, 1991 for commercially zoned or designated property, and January 10, 1992 for all other property; or (3) expiration according to its' terms; (County records indicate your Final SDP was approved May 4, 1990. Therefore, substantial commencement of construction, as defined by the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance, must occur by January 10, 1995. AND b. The construction must continue without interruption and in good faith until it is complete. 4. Anything in the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance to the contrary notwithstanding, an exemption may be revoked upon a showing by the County of a peril to public health, safety or general welfare of the residents of Collier County unknown at the time of approval. It is important that a copy of this Exemption approval letter accompany all development order (e.g. Final Site Development Plan, building permit, sign permit, etc.) applications to assist in avoiding any delay in processing and reviewing of that development order application(s). Should you have any questions regarding the contents of this letter, or the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance in general, please call me at 774-8282. David Weeks Senior Planner Robert E. Blanchard, Growth Planning Director cc: John F. Madajewski, Project Review Services Manager File DGA6.590 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IIEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: XX.X Normal Icgal Advertisement E] Other: (Display Ad,,'.. location, cie.) ~ , /~ '""'"'"'"'"'""'"'"'"'"""'"'"'"'"' Originaling DeplJ Div: Comm. Dcv. Se~'./Planning Pcrson.:~tgv~e-v~ Date: Ot Pclition No. (If none. give brief dcsoription): PUD-97-18 Petitioner: (Name & Address): SiRnaturc Communities, Inc., 5551 Ridgmvood Drive, Suite #203, Naples, FL 34108 · Name & Address of any person(s) Io be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, altach scparntc sheet) Karen Bishop, PMS, Inc., of Naples, 2335 Tamiami Trail Norlh, Suite 408. Naolcs. FL 34013 H~'mng before XXX DCC BZA Other Rcqucstedllearingdatc: _'~.//_ ~ 1~ Bascdonad,'cniscmcnlappc:tri~glSda,.sbcforehcanng Newspaper(s) Io be used: (Complclc only il' imporlanl): XXX Naples Daily News Other [] l.,cgall)' Required Proposed Tcxl: (include legal description & common location g 8i7£:~ pclition No. PUD-97-18, Karcn Bishop of Pr0JcC~ Management Services, Inc., representing Signature Communities, Inc., requesting a rezone from RMF-6, RMF-12{6), RMF-12ST(6) to PUD to be known as The Dunes Planned Unit Dc~'clopmcnt for a maximum of 531 multi-family dxvclling units, located on northwest corner of I 1 I~h Avenue Noah (Blucbill Avenue- also knmvn aS C.R. 846) and Vandcrbilt Drive (c.g. 901), funh¢, desc~bed as Lots I thru 10,Block l, all o.f Block 2 and Lots I thru 16, Block 3, Wiggins Pass Landings ~Jnil #1, ~nd Lots I thru 4, Block I. Wi~.Rins Pass L,'mdings Unit #1 Addition, in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consislin~ of 88.5 acres, more or less. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Docs Petition Fcc include advertising cost'? ~Ycs [] No If Yes. what account should be charged l'or advcmsmg costs: 113-138323-64911() p, o,_fib t i ' ' Division Head ' " Date Count)' Manager Date List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating per,on ~o complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to Count)' Manager. Note: if legal documen! i.n invoh'ed, be sure that any necessary legal review, or reques! for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will dislribute copies: [] Count)' Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Dh'i.nion [] Original Clerk's Office B. other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit ohginal to Clerk's Office. rmaining a co~' for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: I~ IIII I I ~ ~ (including this cover) !11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 LOCATION: NA~LES DAILY NE~S FiX NO.: 263-4864 ii11111111111111111111111111111111111111111'11111111111111111111 FROM: ELLIE HOFFMAN - MINUTES & RECORDS _L_ LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX NO: (813) 774-8408 PHONE 'NO: (813) 77/,-~406 710 O3-13/ 15:31 ~° 02'~ /92634864 OK lU · mil II I I I I ............. I .......... I 12E March 13, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-97-18 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Wednesday, March 18, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, o Ellie Hoffman, DeDuty Clerk Purchase Order No. 800551 ;12B 6 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102, AS ~4ENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS M.A? NUMBER R520S; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM RMF-6, RMF-12ST(6) AND RMF-12(6) TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNO%~ AS THE DUNES FOR A MIXED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF lllTH AVENUE NORTH (BLUEBILL AVENUE - ALSO KNOWN AS C.Ro 846) AND VANDERBILT DRIVE (C.Ro 901), FURTHER DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 THRU 10, BLOCK 1, ALL OF BLOCK 2 AND LOTS 1 THRU 16, BLOCK 3, WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT ~1, AND LOTS 1 THRU 4, BLOCK 1, WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT #1 ADDITION, IN SECTION 20, TO~SHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 88.5 ACRES MORE OR LESS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition PUD-97-18, Karen Bishop of Project Management Services, Inc., representing Signature Communities, Inc., requesting a rezone to be known as The Dunes Planned Unit Development for a maximum of 531 multi-family dwelling units. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIR_MAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (i.nc.l. ud~c~ t]:~'Ls cove.=) ii111111111111111111111111111111111111111111i111111111111111111 1_2B 6 January 30, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-97-18 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, February 22, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 800551 12B NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS NUMBER 8520S; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HERE~N DESCRIBED REA[, PROPERTY FROM RMF-6, RMF-12ST(6) AND RMF-12(6) TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS THE DUNES FOR A MIXED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF lllTH AVENUE NORTH (BLUEBILL AVENUE - ALSO KNO?~ AS C.Ro 846) AND VANDERBILT DRIVE (C.R. 901), FURTHER DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 THRU 10, BLOCK 1, ALL OF BLOCK 2 AND LOTS 1 THRU 16, BLOCK 3, WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT #1, AND LOTS 1 THRU 4, BLOCK 1, WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT #1 ADDITION, IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 88.5 ACRES MORE OR LESS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition PUD-97-18, Karen Bishop of Project Management Services, Inc., representing Signature Communities, Inc., requesting a rezone to be known as The Dunes Planned Unit Development for a maximum of 531 multi-family dwelling units. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Any person who dec~des to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COM/4ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) January 30, 1998 Ms. Karen Bishop PMS, Inc. of Naples 2335 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 408 Naples, FL 34013 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-97-18 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 22, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure January 30, 1998 Signature Communities, Inc. 5551Ridgewood Drive, Suite #203 Naples, FL 34108 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-97-18 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 22, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 12B 6 ORDINANCE ~O. 98- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 8520S; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM RMF-6, RMF-12ST(6) AND RMF-12(6) TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS THE DUNES FOR A MIXED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF li1TM AVENUE NORTH (BLUEBILL AVENUE - ALSO KNOWN AS C.R. 846) AND VANDERBILT DRIVE (C.R. 901), FURTHER DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 THRU 10, BLOCK 1, ALL OF BLOCK 2 AND LOTS 1 THRU 16, BLOCK 3, WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT #1, AND LOTS 1 THRU 4, BLOCK 1, WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS Unit #1 A~DITION, IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 88.5 ACRES MORE OR LESS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Karen Bishop of Project Management Services, Inc., representing Signature Communities, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from RMF-6, RMF-!2(6) and RMF-12ST(6) to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with The Dunes PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number 8520S, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. -1- - 12B 6 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ~ day of 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: BY: BARBARA B. BERRY, Chairman DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency Marj~rie M. Student Assistant County Attorney PUD- 9'7- ! 80RD~NANCIE:/ -2- THE DUNES A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING Tile DUNES. A PLANNED [1NIT DEVELOPMENT. PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE C()LLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PREPARED FOR: SIGNATURE COMMUNITIES. INC. PREPARED BY: PMS. INC. ¢)F NAPI.ES 2335 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH SUITE 408 NAPLES. FLORIDA 34103 I)ATE REVIEWED BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC ()RDINANCE NI. IMBER AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL -- Exhibit "A" i2B 6 TABI,I'~ O!: CONTI'~NTS PAGE I.IST OF I~XtlIliI'I'S iii STATI~NIENT ()F ('()?,II'I~IAN('Ii ix' SECTION 1 I'ROI'ERTY OWNI~RSItlI'. i.I~(;AI. ANI) (;ENEI~AI. I)I~S('RllYI'ION I-1 lhrough I-'2 SECTION 2 I'ROJE('T I)t~VILI.OPM[£NT 2-I throu.sh 2-5 SE£?TI()N 3 RI/Sil)ENTIAI. I)EVI.~I.OI~MENT/\RI!AS 3-I thr()t,gh .'~-) Si';C'I'I ()N 4 PRESI£1~VI£ I)IS'I'RI('T 4-I dlrou~zh 4-2 SI.:CTIf)N 5 (;ENILRAI. I)I£Vtd.()I'MENT ('(),'vlNII'I'.~II.~NTS 5-1 lhrou.sh ~-6 EXIlIFIIT "A" I)UI) hlAS'I'i,]R I)I,AN · lAST (IF EXIlIilITS EXlilBIT #A i'UI) Nla.~ter Plan i2B 6 · S'I'ATI'~MENT ()I" C()MPI,iANCE 'l'l~c dcvelol'mlCnl of :~ppr¢~xinl;tlcly 88.55 ucrcs {~I' properly in ('oilier County ;ts a l'hmncd Unit I)cvch~pmcnl I{, be known as Thc l)uncs will bc in compliance wJlh Iht ('oilier ('(~tllllY ~tS SCl I't~rth in thc (;rowlh Managcmcnl I~hm. Thc l)uncs is I{~ bca mulli-fmnilv residential ;md ussociulcd rccrcatitmal usc project thai will bc cm~sistcnt with applicable clcmcJnts of thc Collier Growth Man;igcmcnl Phm for thc following rcusons: I. Traffic ways. ulilitics, and olhcr public fucililics ncccssm'v to serve Thc J)uncs project i~dCqtlalC. Thc l)uncs will parlicipalc in thc cxpansitm o1' existing public futilities lo thc extent ils impact tm th~)sc l'ucililics via pi~ymcnl ~I' impuct I'ccs. 2. Thc I)uncs i'u'qjccl will bc c(m~paliblc '~vilh and c(m~plimcntm'v, to existing illld plunnL ti hind uses inlhc~icinitv. I>mjcctlandslicinalr;msiti(mm.cuwhichinclmlcslow_riscrcsidcnlial dcvch~pmcnt und high-risc multi-family development. 3. Thc pr(~pcrly was down z(mcd during thc Zoning I{c-cvaluation Process which rcsuhcd in un ucti(m establishing RMF 6 and RMF 12 (6) zoning districts essentially establishing a density ()I' six (6) dwelling units per ucrc and mixed rcsidcmial hind uscs. Thc property contains ;i cro~s itel'cage {~j' 88.55 ~lc'rcs illltl based (mu density o1' six (6) dwclline unils per ,,ross acre. Iht I'L'l) providcsforfivehundrcdundlhirtv{mc(531)dwcllingunits. This action makcs thc land usc m~d density consistent with thc Future l.;md [ Tsc ILlcmcnt of Iht Growth Management l)hm. 4. I)cvcloprncnl c(mmlitmcnls ctmtaincd within this I'L~l) will cnsuz'c that dcvch)pmcnt oi' thc st~b. jcct pr(~perty will proceed in a munncr consislcnt with applicable clcnlcnts of thc Growth Nl:magcmcnt I)hm. SiI()RT TITI,E This {)rdin;mcc .,,lllJll bc km)wn and cited ~ts thc "TI IlL I)I. ;NILS I'I,ANNILI) [.TNIT I)EVELOF'MILNT Oi~,I)INANC'E". SECTION i I)ROI'ERTY OWNERSIlIIL I,E(;AI, ANI) (;ENERAI, i)ESCRIIrI'ION !. I i'URI'OSE The purpose of lhis Section ix Io set forth tile location and ownership of Ihe propcr~y, and to describe thc existing conditions of iht property proposed to be developed under the project name of 'FI 1E I)t ~NES. !.2 I,E(;AI, I)I.iSCRII)TI()N All land (lois and dedicated areas) described in and |nade subject to tile plats of ',A,",,,,'i__ms. Pass l,andings Unit I ils recorded in Plat Book I0. Page 44. of the Public I;',eo:)rds of Collier Cottnlx'. Florida and Wiggins Pass [,andings Unit I Addition as recorded in ]qat Ih)ok I(). Page ,SI. of tile Pt,bile Records of Collier County. Florida. Wiggins Pass l,andings Unit ! l~cginning at tile Soulhcast COFIIOI' {If Section 20. Township 48 south. Range 25 cast. ('oilier Coutlly. Florida. run N 89%52' 20" W. along thc Soulh line of slticl Section 20. for 2053.75 feet. to the point of beginning of I~aker-Cm'roll Point. its recorded in Plat book 8. page 42 of Iht public records of Collier Courtly. Florida: thence run N Oq 14' 0()" W. for 1698.O0 l~el; lhencc mn N 34q26' 15"E. for 439.48 feet; thence run NgTC;4X'OO"E. for 1481.481'cc~: thence runs 02C; 12' 00" E. for 163.77 l~el: thence run N875.48" 00" E. for 250.00 feet. Io lhe East line of said Section 20: thence mn S 02%12' 00" E. along sltid East line for 1970.19 feet. to Ibc point of beginnhlg, also less and except the Soulhcrlv 1298.93 I~et of the Easlerlv 649.46 lbet thereof: less and except thc Southerly 90.00 l~ct ;lilt] thc Easterly 50.00 I~et thereof'for highway pu~oscs. Wiggins l'ass l,andings Unit I Addition A subdivision of tile Southerly 12914.93 feet of tile Easterly 649.46 lbet of Section 20 Township 4N soulh. Range 25 eilsl. ('oilier COtlllly. Florida. less lbo Easterly 50 feet thereof' and less ~he Southerly 90 f~el lhereof, containing 16.65 acres. 1.3 PR()PERTY ()WNERSIlIP A.I,. l)oughc~ly ('o.. Inc.. a l)elaxvare Corporation. Ray Itellcr. Hal Partenhcimer. Floyd .I. Ramm. Dale 1,. Rish. and David L. Brennan. as trustees of I)elnor Neptune Properties. per l)cclm'ation of Trust trader Ohio law. l)clnor l!nlcrpriscs [;nit I I Partners. ;tn Ohio General I'arlncrship. l)elnor 'l'owcrs [init 9. Inc.. an Ohio Corporation. · !.4 (;ENI';RAI, I)ESCRIlri'i()N ()F i~R()I'I';R'I'Y ARI';A A. Thc projccl silo is Iocalcd in Iht norlhwcsl quadrant of fl~c in~crscclion of l~lucbill Avenue alld Vandcrbill l)rivc, illld iN bounded on thc WChl bY lilt I~akcr-C'arroll Point SuNlivi~ion Plat as recorded in Plat Book S Page 42. of the i'ublic Records of ('oilier ('ountv. Florida. The property is bounded on thc Norlh by .jurisdictional wetlands, on Iht East by Vantlcrb~lt l)rive, alld o11 Ihe Sotllh by lllucbill Avenue. !.5 I)IIYSICAI, I)I,~SCRil)TI()N Thc project extends cast from I~,akcr-('arroll I'oint on the West and includes part of tt~e manmadc waterway on thc West. to mangrove I'orcsts. lo a beach dune vcgclatcd with stubby Pine l'lalwoods. Naltlral drainage of Iht uplaml portion of Iht property is wcslcl'lv alld l~t~l'lhcrlx' inlo wcllands which border lidal walCl'S. Walcr ii~mlagculclll for Iht pro.]ecl will bc lhc c~iiqruclcd water storage type. either lake or created wcllltlld lllal'sh type. or a combination of thc two. StOl'ill waters which exit thc storage areas will do so via o~lc or illOl'C control Sll'liCltlrcs which arc I:lorida Water Mallil~ClllClll I)islricl. Topography within thc project is varied, l'ancin~ l'l'Olll sca level to 12~ feel above sca level. Thc entirety of thc site. except for thc mangrove fi'ir}ge along Iht West boundltrv of thc property, lies within I.'lood Zone At! (El. I I') accorcling Io I:IRM I~ancl 01891!. Soil types within thc project include I~asingcr Fine Sillld. l)urbin and Wulfcrt Mucks. and t rrban l.and Satellite Complex. Thc l)uncs project will be a multi-t'amil~,' residential and recreational facilities community which will be developed with a maximum of 531 dwelling units. The buildings shall not exceed it height of one hundred and twenty-five (I 251 feet above the Mean flood l:!levation cstabli-:hcd by law as illt~strated on thc Master I'km. SECTi()N I! PR().115(71' l)l".'~r' I'll,OPM ENT 2.1 Thc purpose of Ihi.,; section is lo generally clc.,;cribc thc project plan of development, rclation~hip~ ~o other prt~jcct relationships. 2.2 (;I':Ni'iR..kl, ,\. I)cx'clot~mcllt of 'l'llc l)tmcs, shall tlc in ;tccol'd;JV~Cc with tile cot~tcnt of this }'l;inncd /'nit I)cx'cl{,pmcnl document ami npplict~blc scclions of thc ('oilier County l.;~nd l)cvch,p~cz~t ('ode ;t~tl (;rowll~ Mim;tgcmc~l ])ltt~ J~ cfi'cci ;ti ll~c lime of isst~it~cc {)1' icily dcvcJopmci~t o~;:r. SLI~'I1 its bttl llot limited t() t:in;tl NtiDdivision J)Jitl. }:illill Site I)cvclopmcnl J>Jim. t~xcitvitlioll I)c~mil. ;~lld I'rclin~illiu'y Work Authoci/.ation. to which such rcguliilitms I'CJitlC. W]lCI'C these rcgul;itlons fail l*V{~vidc clcvclopnlcntal stantl;u'cts, thc~ thc pvox'isions of thc ~ost similar district in thc I.and I)cvclopmcnt ('ode shall npply. [:nlcss otherwise noted. IJlc definitions of ;cji ltl'IllS shnll be thc same as lilt dcFinititms scl ~'ol'lJl in C. /kll c{mdilions imposed and all graphic mittcviitl presented dcpictin~ restrictions for thc dcvcl{q, nlcnt o1' Thc l)uncs shall become part of thc rcgulittions xvhich govern thc manner in which linc I'[;I) silo m;~v be developed. 1). I :nlcss n~odil'icd, waived or excepl0d t)y this I'kll). lbo provisions oi' thc LI)('. whcvc vcmi~in it~ Full l'occc and el'lC'ct wJlt~ rcspccl to thc dcvclopmc~t ()1' thc la~ld which coi~q)viscs Ii. I)c','clopmc~'~t pcc~'l~itlcd hca'cDr ;,.'ill be SLlb. iCCt to coc~cucvc[~cy review under thc provisions I)ix'isit,n 3.15. Adcqti;ttc Public i:acilitics, of thc LI)C. 2.3 I)i':SCRII*TI()N ()F PilO.II';CT PI.AN AND PR()POSEi) I.ANI) USES A. 'l'hc I)~'(~jcct MiLNICv IH;~n. including lav()ul ()I' streets ;md usc of IlL,ltl 1'o]' thc 'Viii'it)US pitl'CCJs. illusl~'iLlCd gCitpllicitJlV t~V l!xhiDit "A". thc ['t 7I) M;tstCV l)evclopmcnt I'Inn. q'l~c Ditltll'C ;tlld 2-1 6 i'R()JE('T I)EVEI,()i'.~li';NT 2.1 Thc purpo,~c of Ihi,~ .;¢clion i~ Io gcncrall~ dc%tribe Ibc pro. joel plan of development, rclalion,hip~ h~ applicant ('(nmb. ()rdinanccs. Ibc rcspcclivc laml usc~ of thc Ir;~cls included in thc pr()lccl, a, ~cll ax -~hcr pnUccl rcla~i,n~hips. ' 2.2 (;ENERAI, A. I)c~.ch~pfl~cnl ~f' Thc I)un¢., ..hall bc in ;,cc~rdancc with thc C-nlcnl ~l' lhi~ I'lanncd I 'nit I)cxcl-pmcnl d~wumcnl and applic;Jblc ~ccli(lll~ ~l' lilt ('oilier ('ounlv I.and l)cvch~pmcnl ('~dc itn(J (;rc)xglh ~ianligt'nlc'rll I'Jan iii c'l'fct'I al Ibc limt' of i*~m,ncc (,1' ',,nv (Icvcl(~pnlcnt ~tt;.'r. ~uch ~,~ btJl fl~f I~mllcd h)I"inal SuNIlx ~si()n I'lal. I',r)al Silo I)cvch)prncnf I'llm. i~xc~;,ti()n t'Ctmll, ami I'rcl~rtum,ry W.rk ALJlh(~rt/mi~)n. h) which ~uch rcFtllali~m% rch,lc. Where these rc~ulal,m, frei h) pn~ NIc (Ic~'ch)pmcnlld ~lltrl(I;,r(l%. Ilion Ibc pr(~ l~is)fl~ ~)1' Iht ru()st ~imilar dislricl in thc ('ounlx I.;md I)cvch~prncnl ('~lc ~l);lll ~,ppl~'. B. I'nlc~ ~lhcr~vi~c holed. Iht dclinilions of all lernl~ q~all ~ thc ~anle ;is Ibc dcfiniti(m~ ~ct forth in Illc (',dlicr ('()unlv I.and I)cvch~pmcnt ('~xlc in cfTccl at thc lime ()f building permit applicalion. (' All c(mdH,)ns ireD)sod and all gr~lphic rnalcrial prcscnicd dcpiclin~ restrictions for Iht dc~ ch)pmcnl (~r' Thc I)unc~ q~all become par[ of the rc~ulllli(ms which ~ovcrn thc manner in which Iht Iq 'l) ~}tC max ~' dcxrcl()~.d. I). { 'nlc'~ m-dilicd, waived or cxccplcd b~ Ihi~ Pt;i). Ibc pr-visions of Iht 1.1)('. ~'t~crc applicable. ~cnmln in I,II h~rcc and cl'l~'c~ xgilh rc~pccl I~ Ibc dcvclopmenl 01' Iht land ~vt~ich c'ornpr~cx lhi~ Ii. I)¢',ch~pf~lcnl pcrmillcd Iicrcb~, will I~c ,¢ubiccl I¢) concurrcncv review under J)l~ixil~ll 3. 15. AdCqII;IIC J)tlbJic J"ilcJJJlJt'~. i)r' IJlo J.J)(' 2.3 I)EN('RIFI'Ii)N ()F I'R().JI';('T I'I,AN AN'I) I'R()i)()SEI) I,ANI) t;Si']S A. Thc p~lccl .Ma~lL'r Jqan. ~nclmling Ja~ul ~1 slrccl~ and usc oJ' land For file ~llU~lralcd ~raph~calls bs l:xhil~l "A". Ibc I'l '1) Nlaxlcr I)cvch~pmcnl Phm. Thc nalurc and ~,1 land u,c~ ~t ilJlirl thc prolccl ix Imhcalcd bN lhc l'~lh~wing table: ,,,,,, ii ii ii, ii ii I ..... IIIIIIIII .......... I 12B 6 MAXI,MIJ,M I,A~D U~i'; INTEN,~iTy 81,;MMARy MAX. I).U.'.~ A (,,'R ES Re%Montini 53 1 85.55 ()pen Spl,cc (4 (,,tY; 53.13 (I.akcs. M;m in;Mc x~illcrx¥11,,',,, t'rcscrvc~, l.:lmb, ca~. Ihll'l'cr,, & Rccrcillilmal/\rcas) 2,4 REI.A'rEI) I'II(}JE('T I'i,AN AI'I'It()VAI. RI':QIrlRI.;.MENTS A. I'l,,r h~ Iht rco,rdfnF ~1 ;i Rcc{,nl I'li|i. ilml ,,r ('~md, mlinium I'l;ll Jill i,r pllrl iff thc I'['l). final l~hln~ I,,r MI rcqLJircd Illlprl~vclllcnl~ ~h;lll rcccivc ;~ppr~v;ll (~1' thc appr~q~ri;llc ('oilier ( l lc~ch~lm~Cnl ('~lc. ;lrld Ibc phdling I;l~vs ~1' Ibc SlillC ill' Fh*rid;h if applicable. Ii. i:xl,lm "A". thc PI 'l) Nlil,,lcr i'l;m, clm~,titutc,~ thc required I'UI) l)cvcMpmcnt t'lan. Subscqucnl lo ~r omcurrcnl ~'ilh PI'l) ;~ppn~vM. a l~rcliminarx Su~livision Plat. il' i~pplicablc, shall bc ,ubmillcd l'~r Iht cnlirc area c~vcrcd by tl]c !'['1) XM~tcr I'hm er allcrnalivclv, for p{mionx plm~c~ ~f' il ;~ dcvch~pol./Xnv divi~Mn of ImM ;md thc dcvch~pmcnl ~I' iht land ~h;lll hc om~pli;mcc ~'ilh [)ivi~i{~ll 3.2 ~1' Ibc ('~41icr ('OtllllV [.lind I)cvcMpmcnl ('~xle. and thc l;l~l~ Ill' Iht SI;IIC Ill' Fh:rid;i. (' Thc l~rl,vl,,,,r~., ~l' I)ivi%Um 3.3 of ibc ('141icr ('ounly l.and l)cvch~pmcni ('{Mc. when applicable. ql;,ll ;,ppl) h~ die de~elnpmenl i~l' Jill plillled Irilcls i~r parcels l~l' lilnd iix provided in silitl [)iridium pri,~r h~ IlK' I~UilrK'c itl' ;I buihlin~ B'rmil ~r nlhcr dcvch~pmcnl {~rdcr. I). Thc dc,,'ch~pmcnl ol .',m, II-iici i~r pan.'cl ~lpprm'cd I'l)r rcsi¢lcnli;ll dcvch)pmcnl c(mtcmpialing ,,imlqC ~,x~ ncr%hil, ~l' h,ml h,' cllch ¢l~clling unit ,dliilJ be required ti> stlbmil and receive approvM ~1' il J'l'clilllillilr%, .~IIIXID, i~.iltil I'hll ('{dln:r('~llnl'~ I.ilnd I)c',ch~plllClll ( .NulMI'~ I',,illll I'liil I~}r ;111~ ',m.'h pl}l'llllll Ill IHt Ir;icl i~r parcel. I'llllll. n~iid. Imtqic. i~rl,. ;,h.'. cli,cmCnl', ',hMI bc c',lahlishcd ils required during Iht S[)P ;ind or phil ;ippr~l~ iii pn~.'c,,,,. I". /\ppr~pri;llc in%Irun~cnl,, u, III bc pr{~ lilt'ti ;il Ibc lilllc ~I' infraslruclurc ilnprovcn~cnls regarding dcdicalim~s ami thc nlclh~l l'l~r pr~, idin[: pcrpclual nl;iintcnancc oI' common facililic,< '2.5 MOl)El, ilOMI,;S/SAI,I.;S OI.'I.'ICI.;S Model Jilt)file. sales c¢lllel's and olhcl' uses aba sll'tlCltlrcs rcJalcd Io Iht pronlolion ami sale of real CqlalC such as. bul llOl limited I(). pavilions, viewing pJilJf'()l'lllS, gazebos, parking areas. Icnls. il[ld signs, shall be pcrmiltcd principal uses [hroughot~l Thc l)tJncs ('~mlmunity sut~jccl to thc rCtluircmcnts of Section 2.6.33.4 of the ('oilier ('ounlv l.and I)cvclopmcnt code. 2.6 AMENi)MlqNTS T() l't;l) I)()CUMENT ()R !'['!) MASTER iq,AN zXlllCildlllCnls nlax' be lll;IdC lo this l't il) ()rdimmcc its prm'idcd in thc ('oilier ('OtHllX l.and I)cvcloptncnt ('ode. 5ct'li{m 2.7.3.5. 2.7 ASS()('i..VI'I()N ()!" I'i,I()i)I';I,Ui'Y ()~,VNI';RS I"()R C()MM()N Al,ti'iA MAINTI'iN:\N('i,; ('on'Jlll~ll itl'ca nlililltclliHlu'C will bc provided b', a .Maslcl' I~l'~}pCl'ly ()wIlcl'S' Association to r,c crcalcd by thc dcvch~pcr. Thc JlFt~pCl'ly OWIIOI'S' ilSXOCilllJOll shall bc responsible l'or thc Ol)Cralion. IllililllCllilI1CC. ;tlld lllilllilgCII1Cfll 1¥ lilt Sttl'J'itCC xvillcr illllJ NIOFIIIXXrillCI' lllilllil~ClllOlll SVNICfllS. illld prcscl'VCs NCI'VID~ 'J'IIC I)uncs ('ommunilv. in accordimcc with thc p:':>visi:ms of Ihis I'[~l). togclhcr wilh any. applic::l, ic permits fl'Olll Iht J"Jol'ida I)cparlluCnl {~I' Imvinmmcnlal J'r(~lCu'liOll. [ [.S. Al',jlly ('Ol'pS of I~II~ilIOCI'S. ;tlltJ N~t~lJl I"lorida Walcr Mallagcnlcnl I)Jslricl. 2.8 i,AXi)S(,AI'I,; illrl.'l.'i,;RS, BI,il{M, I.'i,;SCI.:S AND ~¥AI,I,S I,alltlscalX' bul'l'crs, bcrms. I'cnccs. and walls arc generally pcrmillcd as a imncipal usc lhrough~ml Thc l)UllCS ('t,l/llltZnilv. Thc l'olhm'ing slandi,'ds shall A. I,antlqcal~C bcrmx shall Ilar0 thc l'~lh~wing maximum side slopes: 1. (;rasscd I~crms 4:1 2. (}l'l~tllRI COVCI'Cd I~CI'IllS 3. Ril*-Rap bcrms I'1 4. Slrt~u'lural walled hot'ms - vertical al thc base {~I' Iht l'cncc <,' wall. I"or lilt pt~rl~OSc o1' this provision, l'inishcd el'adc shall be c~msidcrcd 1{~ be no greater lhan eighteen inches ( I 8") above thc tlighcsl croxvn clcx'alion ol'thc llCill'CSl cxisling road unless Iht fence or waJJ these cases thc wall shall m)l exceed six l~'Cl (6') in hciahl, From thc lop of berm elevation for berm clcvalion Wilh an average side slope ~>1'-'.:I hcighl from Iht t(~p {~1' berm clCvalion I'{,' herren wilh an average side slope oI' grcalcr lJlltll 4:1 (i.e. 3:1~. ('. I.:md,,,.'al'~C I',ul'l'c,j's. I'~c,j'ms. l'cnccs and walls may bc constructed ahmg file perimeter of Thc l)tmcs ('(~IlIrlILIIlilV I~l 'l) bl~tllltlitrv prior to sttbtlivisi(m plat ()I' sil0 dcvcJoplllClll ])Jall subll/itlal. ,&Il ~tlk'Jl al'Cas Illtlsl bC included in a JillldSCapc buffer CilSCIllClll ()I1 final plats, or in a sepal'ate I'Ct'OFdCd illslrtllllCtll. 2-3 ':t,9 i)i.;Si¢;N ¢;I.:ll)i';I.I,NILS AND STANI)ARi)S 'l"hc csl;~blishmcnl ~)I' a I~llmncd Unit l)cvcl~u)mcnt is inlcndcd imagination in thc pl~mning, dcsign fills dcvclopmcnt or rcdcvclopment oi' rclativcly large tracts of I:md Tim i)uncs ("ommtmitv is pt;Inncd its ;~ private, l'unctionally intcrrcllttcd comnlunily under unified control, to be dcvclopcd over an extended lime period. The developer will establish commtmitv-widc design gttidcJincs ;md sland;irds lo ensure ;~ high and consistent level o1' quality for commtmitv I'C;~tUFCS and l'acilitics, which include items such as landscaping. ]lardscttpc. waterscapes, signagc, lighting. pedestrian systems, bicycle palhs, puvcmcnl Ii'cltllllCllls. roz~dway mod;tins. I'cnccs. walls, bul'l'ct's, bcrms Thc I)cvclopcr will ;,.'hicvc thc ;d'~ovc ~>bjcctivcs D~,' mc;ms of recorded co,/cnimts, condili~;ns. ;md rcstricti~ms. 2.10 (;ENI';RAI. I'ERMi'I'Ti,;I) USI';S C'crtair~ ttscs shall be considered gcncral pCrnliltcd uses throL~ghout The l)tmcs Commtmitv l~[?l) cxccpl in thc l'rcscrvc I)istrict. Cicncral permitted uses m'c those uses which gcncr~tllv, sCFVC thc ~)cvclopcr rcs;denis o1' Thc I)tmcs ('~mmunitv itntl arc ls'pic~dly DiII'I 111' thc common i~II'Fitslr'uCIUFC or ;irc considered com~t~rlJtV I';tcJlilics. /\. (;choral I)crmiltcd [Jscs: I. l~sscntiltl services its .set forth tinder Ihe Collier CoL]nty Land l)cvclopment Code. Section 2.6.t). I. 2. %~,';slcr m;m;~.gcmcnl I'acililics ired related .sl['uc'turcs. 3. i~;~kcs including lakcs with I~t Ikhci~cls t)r other architcclurlll or struclur~tl b;tnk tFc;ttmCnlS. 4. (;tli~rdh{)t~scs. g~tchc)t[scs. ;~r~d itc'cess control strtictt[res. 5. Ncighb~)[-h~)t~(l p~rks, rcc['c;ttioni[I l'acililics lind community centers. 6. Tcinp{~r'iti-y conslrtlcli()n, sides. ;md iiclministrltlivc ol'l'iccs l'or thc I)cvclopcr ;ilia thc I)cvclopcr's ;tt~lJl{)Fi/.cd CO~IIF~tCIt~FS ;Ir~'[ COllStl]ltllllS. including ncccsS~il-V ;lcccss wi~¥$, p;lrking ;itches ;llld l'cJ;tlcd L~sCS. 7. LitnclscilI)c J'Cilltll'CS including, but not limilcd lo. landscttpc bul'l'crs, bcrms, l'cnccs ;tntl w;tlls sttD. jcct to tile st~trlcl~lrcls scl forth in Section 2.8 of this ['Ltl). 8. z~lly ()tllcl' LISC which is C'Olll[)itl';l[~lC ill rlillL[rc with thc foregoing uses ;ilia which thc I)cvcl~[~mcnl Services I)ircclor dc~crlllillcs lo [,c colllpttliblc. 2-4 ~ II II II II III II I II II I I · 12B 13. Development Slandards: Unless otherwise set I'orth in this docunlcnt, the following dcvclopmcnl slandaals shall apply m struclurcs: I. Setback from back o1' curb or edge of pavement of any road - Fi flccn l~ct (15') except l'or guard houses, galchouscs, and access control structures which shall have no required setback. 2. Sclback I'r(m~ properly lines - Twenty (20') I~ct. 3. Minimum distance bclwt:cn slrtlcltlrcs which arc part of m~ archilcclurally unified grouping - Five lkct {5' ). 4. Minimum dislancc bclWOCll um'clalcd slruclt~ros - Tell feet (10'). 6. Mi:fimum floor urea - None rCtlUircd. 7. Minimum lot or pm'cci area - None required. 8. Sidewalks. bikcpaths, and carlpnths may be placed within Cotmly required bul'lkrs: however thc widthoflhcrcquirctlbul'l~rshall be increascd proportionlttely to thc width (,I' thc paved stH'l'acc o1' thc sidewalk, bikcpath, or carlpath. 9. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and olhcr land uses where such standards arc not specified herein, arc to be in ilCCt)l't[illlCC with the Collier County Land Development ('ode in cf foci at thc time of Sil0 l)cveh,pment Phm approval. 2.11 OPEN SPACES REQUIREMENTS Thc PUD Mastor Plan identifies approximately 53 acres included in thc Recreation. Landscape/Open Space. I,akcs and t'rcscrvc District designations. Those itl'0aN fully satisfy the open space requirements of Section 2.6.27 and Soclion 2.6.32 of tho Collier County I,and Development Cc)dc. 2.12 NATIVE Vli(;ETATI()N RETENTION REQUIREMENTS Twcmv Five I'c~'ccnt (25t,'~ } of the viable naturally functioning native vegetation on site shall be preserved. 2-5 · . 12B 8 " SECTI()N 111 RESII)I':NTIAI, I)I':VEI,()IBII':NT AREA."; 3.1 I'URI'()SI'~ Thc purpose oI' Ihis .",;cclion is Io establish land usc ro~ulathm~ and dcvclopmcn! standards for Ibc rcsidcnti:ll tlcvclopmcl~t al'CaS imlicalcd on I:,xhibit "/V'. thc I'UI) Master l'lan. 3.2 M:kXIMUM I)~,VEI,I,IN(; UNITS Thc maximum nulnbor ol'dwclling unils permitted in thc entire PUl) is 531. 'Floc propcri? contains gross acreage o1' ~g.55 act'ex and based on a density of six (6) dwelling units per grogs acre. thc PL'I) provides for five hundred and thirty one (531) tlwclling units. This action makes Iht land usc and dcnsily Col~sislC1~l wilh Iht l:tllt~l'C l,and l ;sc Element of tl~c Gmwlh Man;tgcmcnl I'lan. I)islribtllioll of Iht dwcllin~ unilx in Iht rcsitJc~llial areas is nol prctlclcrll~Jl~cd, alld nlaV occar as audmrized via SiIc l)cvcl~pmcr~t I)lan approval. 3.3 (;I'~NERAI, i)I';S(;RII'Ti()N /SI'cas designated "R" on the Master Plan arc dcsi?cd lo accommodate a full range of residential dwelling types, compalihlc mmrcsidcnlial uses. a full range of recreational Facilities. e~cntial services. Thc approximifle acrea,,c of lbo "R" dislricl i~ indicaled on Ibc I'Ul) Mas:er Plan. This acl'ea~e is based on conceplual designs and is approxinlalc. Actual acreages oI' ifil dcvelopmem ll'aClS will be provided al Iht lime o1' Sil0 I)cvclopmcnl Iqan or lh'etiminarv Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance wilh I)ivision 3.3 and I)ivision 3.2. rcspcc:ively, of tho ('oilier County l,and Development Code. Rcsidenlial ll'ilClS aFC designed to ilCCOllllllOdalc i[llel'rlal l'Oild~Vilvs, opcll splices, parks and alllellilv at'OilS. ]likes and wa~er managomeul l'acililies, alld olhcr similar uses l'ot~ltl ill rcsitlenlial areas. 3.4 I;Sl';S PERMITTEI) ,,\. I'rincipal I. Nlulti-I'aulilx dxvcllings including gm'don al~arlnlcnls. 2. Single-family ;lllacJlett ;llld I~WllJl(m~o dwellings. 3. I'ublic parking B. Acccss()ry I~scs I. lists and slrtlcltlrcs cust(mmi'ilv itss(WialCd xvilh principal uses permitted. 2. Privale boalllotlsos alld docks, subject Io Sec. 2.6.21 of the Collier County Lalld Development ('ode. 3-1 12B 6 3. Recrct,lional l'acilitics Ihal serve t~s tin inlc~ral parl oI' Ihe rcsidenlial dcvelopmcnl :md have bccn tlcsignatcd, reviewed and approved (ma site dcvclopmcnl plzm or preliminary subdivision pltll l'()r IIitlt tlcvcJ{)l)lllClll. Recreational l'acililics may illcltltJc. [~tll :IFc rl(~l limited I() clubh()u~c, community center I~uiltlin~ ;mtl tennis I'acililics. pzu'ks, j)l;~y~rounds ;tntt pl~yl'icltls. 4. 14ccrcmional futilities and amenities l'or use by rcsidcnls of thc residential 3.5 I)i'~VI,~I.()i'M ENT S'i':\NI)ARI)S A. 'i'abl¢ I sets forth the tlcv¢lopment sland~wds For land uses within the "1~" t~csitlcnli:d I)istrict. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other hind uses xvhcrc such standards :~,'~: '.'~ot spccil'icd herein m'c to bc in ;tccordancc with ('oilier ('ounty Land l)cvclopmcnl Code in ct'feet z,t thc lime ~l' Site I)cvclopmcnl I~lan ~pprox'al. [hllcss otherwise indicalcd, r'cquivcd yltrtls, hcishts. ~lntl I'h)~r ~l~'cll stlmdltt'tts ill)ply Io principnl strucltlrcs. D. I)cvch)pmcnl standards For uses not spcciFic:~lly scl Forth in 'I'~blc I shall bc cstnblishcd tlurin~ thc Site l)cvclopmcnl J~Jitll il[)J¢l't)vitJ ils scl Forth in I)ivision 3.3 of the Land Development (7ode in itCCOl'd;illce with those standards oF Iht zoning district which is most similar to thc pl'OposctJ list. All yards, setbacks, cie. shall bc in relation Io thc individual parcel boundaries, except as olhcrwisc provided J'or [,v Ihis document. (w except as aulhorizcd via thc Site Development PJilll approviil process. 3-2 Tile I)UNES COMMUNITY I)EVEI.OI'MENT STANI)ARDS FOR TAIH,E , Parccl R-6 I~arcel R-6 Parcels 3-~ MJ.Jlnom 3,(lift) ~[: N'A N A ].or A rea i Minimum I.ol Width '~ 30 150 N A -J ['rOlll Yard ~()" 25 Frlml Yard for .... ~ideYard ()or.5 BIt" 0.5 Btl ( si~tl Princil)al 2(I B FI Rear Yard Accessory I() 15 15 Rent Yard TM I() ().5 BH Maximum Distance IIt, t~'cen I)rincipal StruchJrt, s fi SBII 0.5 Sll}I ( Fh)or Area 1 2(}1) NJ: IIX){) SF ~ 12(~) SF Min. ~: Building He*ght (Sum of Building He,ghl): Comb)ned height ol ~o adiacenl buildings for the purposes ,,f tlc cr finin~ ~clback All (JlMilflt't'~ ;ITL' Ill JccJ Ill)Jc~% ()JJicr%%lSC 3-3 nn~[ [] iii] [[[]]i[ Illl I Ill Illll ....... Il ........ [ 12B 6 SECTION ~V I)RESERVi'~ I)ISTRICT 4.1 I'URI'()SE Thc pu,'posc of this Scmi(m is to idcntil'y permitted uses and development standards for arc;tx within 'Floc l)tllleS ('onlnlunily dcsignalcd ~m Iht Mi~xtu'l' Plan as I'rcxcrvc l)ixlrJcl. 4.2 (;ENI';RAi, i)I';SCRIiq'I()N Areas designated ti.,; Prcscl'VC Oll IJlc l'vlaxlcr PI;All ;,irc designed Io ;,lCCOllllllOtJal¢ ti fuji l';.lil~,C conservation lind limited w:,tcr m;magcmcnt uses and l'unctioris. Thc primary purpose of linc I'rcscrvc Dixtrict iN to retain viable n;llurally I'unctioning wclhiml ;iIRI XCl'iC upi;md syxlcmx. I() allow ;'cNtonlti~m and enhancement of impacted or dcgrmlcd wctland xyxtcmN, and Io provide an open amenity for thc cn.joymcnt of Thc I)uncs ('omrminity rcxitJclllx. 4.3 PERMITTEI} USi':~ AND ~TRU('T~RI':~ No building or slruclurc, or parl Ihcrcof. shall bc creeled, altcrcd or usc(t, or kind or water used. in whole or in pm'l. I'~r other tli;m Iht I~)IIowing: A. l'crmiucd I'rincipal t~scs and SlrtiCltll'CX I. I'assivc rccrcatiomd areas, boardwalks, including rccrcalional shc Iicrs and Biking. hiking, nature m~d cqucslrian mfil~ (excluding asphalt paved trails in wetlands). 3. [;npavcd pedestrian paths in xeric uplands. 4. Water nmnagcmcnl facilities, structures and lakes, including lakes witJl bulkhcad:q other archilcclt~r;d lrCHllllClllS. 5. Mitig:ition areas ;is provided in Ihc ('ocoh;ttchcc Strand I,~,cstor;~tion Plan ;l{ltt other applicable permits. 6. [llilily lines in xeric uplands. 7. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is comparable in nature with thc I'orcgoing uses alld which thc Development Services l)ircclor dclcrnlincs lo be COnlpatiblc in thc l'rcscrvc District. 4-1 ~1.4 I)EVEI,Oi~MI.:NT STAXi)ARI)$ A. All slrtl¢ltlr¢.,; sN, II scl N~ck a rnininmm of five feel (.5') from Preserve l)islrict bot,nd;,ries and roads, cxcepl for pull]ways, boardwnlks and ',vuter mamLgemcni slruclures v,'hich si'mil have no required sclbuek. B. l.ighlin~ facililies si'mil he arranged in a manner which will prolcc! road',,vnys and residcntial properties from dirccl glare or unreasonable inlcrfcrcnc¢. C. Mnximun; height of struclt~res - Twcnly five fcc! (2.5'). D. Minimum distance between principal slruclurcs - Ten feel (I O' ). F.. Minimum tli,m,ncc between accessory slruclt, rcs- Five feel (5'). t:. MJnJnlLllll floor ul'ca - None required. G. Minimum Iol or parcel area - None required. tl. Slandurds for parking, landscaping, signs ~md olhcr land uses where such xlandards arc specified herein or wilhin a(Iopled The l)uncs Communily l)esi~n Gt, idelin¢,¢ and Standards. are Io be in t,ccord',mce wilh Collier C'ounly Laml l)evclopment Code in el'feet m Ihe time of Site l)evelopmenl Hah Approval. Unless mherwise indicaled, required y~,rds, heiglns, and floor area 'm~ndartls apply m principal slrucmres. I. The Marginal Wharf shall be in compliance wilh the Manatee Protection J'lan ill Ihe lime of final tlevelopn]¢nl order :,pprov~fl. 4.$ I'RESERVI.; AREA CONSERVATIf)N A non-exclusive conscrvalion cascmcnl or Ir;icl is required by Collier ('ounty Limtl Development ('ode Seclion 3.2.g.4.7.3 for lands included in Ihe l'reserve l)islrict. In nddilion to Collier County. non-exclusive conservalion eascmcnl may ilJso be required by olher regulutory agencies wilh jurisdiclion over Preserve I)islricl lands. In addilion to complying wilh provisions of thc Collier ('ounlv Development ('ode. said casement shall be provided in accordance with the terms scl forth any itpplicablc permit granlcd by other agencies. Thc Master I'ropcrty Owners' Associalion shall bc responsible for conlrol and maintenance of lands wilhin lhe Preserve J)islricl. 4-2 128 6 SECTION V GENERAl, I)EVF. I,OPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 i'URI'()SE Thc purpose of lifts Section is lo scl l'orlh Ihe development commilntcnts for thc dcvclopmcm of thc pro j0el. 5.2 (;ENERAI. All facililics shall i',: constrt,clcd in strict accordance wilh this PUl) doer, mont. qpplicablc Final SiIc l)cvclopmcnt Plans. Final Subdivision Plats. :md all applicable Stale and local laws. codes, and regulations applical~lc to this I'trl). l/xccpt where specifically noted or staled otherwise. Ibc sla:!dartts and specifications of ~he [.and l)cvch~pmcnt Code. I)ivision 3.2 shall apply to this pro.jeer ever, il' thc hind within thc Pt;I) is not to be platted. The l)cvclopcr, its successor ;llld assigns, shall be r,.'~ponsiblc for the commilmcnls outlined in this docu[ncnt. 5.3 PUl) MASTER iq.AN A. Exhibit "A". tile Pt;l) Master I'lan. illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nalure, l'roposcd Ii'acl. Jol or land usc boundaries or special land use boundaries. SJlaJ] not be con~trucd io be specific and may be modified during thc platting or site dcvelopmenl plan approval process. Subject m the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5 of the Land I)cvelopment Code. PUl) amendments may I~ made from lime lo lime. B. All necessary casements, dedications, or olher instrumcnls shall be granlcd to insure the conlinucd operation and IllailllCnallCe of all service utilities and all common areas in lilt project. C. The flfllowing shall bc considered minor changes and refinements. I. Reconfiguralion of prose: cc areas..jurisdictiomfl wetland limits, and miligation features as it restllt of regulatory agency review. 2. Rcconfiguralion of lakes, ponds, canals, or olher waler management facilities where such changes arc consislcnl wilh the crileria of the South Florida Water Management District mid ('oilier ('OtlglV ;md where lJlCl'O iS IlO ftlrlJlcr ellCrOilcJllllogl into preserve areas. 3. Internal realignment of rights-of-way other fl~an a reh~'alion of access points lo the PUl). 4. Reconfiguralion of residential parcels when there is no encroachment into preserve areas. 5-1 12B 6 ~;.4 SCIIEI)Ui,I.: ()F I)i.:VEI,OI~,%ll.;NT/M()NIT()RIN(; REI'()RT ANI) .gUN.',;l.Tr i~R¢)%'INI()N Markctin~ <~1' rcsidcmial si~c~ will ~'~',m in calendar year Igg7. ('on~lruclion is expected to ho concluded t~v Monilorin~ Reporl: An annual monilorin~ repot! shall bc suhmillcd pur,manl Io Section 2.7.3.fl of Ihe ('oilier ('ounlv I.and I)cvch~pmcnl $.-~ P()I,I,IN(; Pursuanl to Section 2.6.30 at the l.and l)evelopmcnl ('ode. provision ~llall be m:u, le for the l'ulurc usc of space wilhin ii conmtou t'mitding for lire pfc'pose of accommodaling tile l't~nCliOn of an clccIor.d polling pi;icc. Art agreemcnl ,droll hc rccc~rded itl Iht ~l'l'icial rccortl,¢ of' Iht ('lcrk ()1' Ibc ('ircuil ('curl ()1' ('~dlicr ('OIIIIIV. which hh;tll be Nnding tipper1 any and all StlCCCss~rs iJ1 illlcrcsl that acquire ownership (fl' such C(HIIIII()II ;troll% including, btll llOt [inliled lo. corld(Hllillitml associations. }lOllle()~Vller it~x()ciltlJons. ()r communily recrc;~lmn'puhlic Ix~ildings,'puhlic r<~oms or similar common facilities Io be used for a pollin~ place il':lclcrmincd Io t:e necessary I,y Iht ~upervi~or of l{leclion~. 5.6 SUi~I)IVI,',;i()N RI':OLrlRi.:,4, II.;NTS ..'*,NI) S'I'..',,,NI).-'~,RI) I)I.:SI(;N SUI~STITUTI()N.',; /\. Privi,l¢ slrcels shall conl'ornt ,.vilh Ih¢ right-of-way width requircntcnls of Subscclion 3.2.g.4.16.5 of ll~c I.I)C cxccpl as follows: ('ul-dc-sac iUld local streets less Ihlm one Ihousand feet (I .O0(Y)in Icnglh arc required have a nlinimt,m I'orl,v foot (40') righl-ol'-w:ly width and IWo len fool (I 0') wide Ilax'¢l lanes as required bv Subsection 3.2.g.4.16.5. /\11 olher cul-de-sacs are required Io have a minimunl of forlv fool (40') ri,.:ht-ol-'.,.':tx' widlh and Iv.'o ICh fool (I()') wide lravcl lanes as required I~y Suhseclion 372.s.4. All olhcr local slrccls arc required h~ have a minimun~ l'orlx' feet (4()') ri,..:hl-ol'-wav and I',v~ ICh fix~l (I()') wide Ir:wel I:mo, a,, required by Subsection 3.2.X.4.1(~.5. ('ul-dc-~,m.'s may exceed a lenL. zlh of' l'il'tccn hundred feet (150()') as required bx' subsection 3.2.S.4. I 6.6. T:mgent,¢ t~clwccn reverse curves shall not I~c reqt, ircd under Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.1(). SIrccl grades mav cxcccd four pcrccnl (4r;) under Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.14 provided that applicable I"lorida i)cparlmenl of Transportation. Manual of Llnil'orm Minimum StitlltJllrtJs (J:J)()']' Mt :MS) ;llid ,'~:~SI J'J'O criteria arc mol. 5-2 · 12B 6 'FRANSi~ORTATI()N Thc development of this Pt Ii) Master ]'hm sh;lll bc ,~t;b.i¢cl to and ~ovcrncd by thc f'olh)win~ c~mditi~,n,: A. Work within ('oilier County ri~ht-of-way Sll;ll] mcct thc requirements of ('oilier ('ountv R i~ht-Of-Way Ordinance No. 93-64. Both n()rthbound and southbound turn lanc~ shall bc required on Vandcrbil~ I)rivc. 'Fum lanes shall Iw in phlce and available for all phases of thc pro. joel including initial construction. ~alc, cenler operation and final occupancy. C. Bolh eastbouml ami westbound lurn lanes shall bc required on Blucbill Avenue. Turn lanes ,hall bc in place and avaihtble for all phases of thc projccl including inilial construction, sales center operation and final occupancy. I). Thc applicam shall he rcq)<msiblc for Iht inslall;tli{)n of street lighting at all pr{0cct t-rllrance~ al Substantial competent evidence shall be pr()vidcd by Iht developer to thc effect that thc pro.itel designed I()provide capacily and lrealmcnl for hislorical roadway ru~loff. In addilion. drainage shall not be pcrmiucd lo discharge directly in any roadway drainage system. [:. All required improvemenls, excluding righl-of-way donalions li)r roadway segmenls s~cifically mcnlioned in Ibc County's Five-Ten Year Work Plan. shall be considered "site related" as defined in Ordimmce 02-22. ils amended. II~e Collier County Road Impacl ]:ce Ordinance. and shall not be eligible for credit toward ally road imp:icl lbcs required by lille ordinance. This slipulalion specifically refers to silc-rClalcd Itu'Il lanes mentioned in [Ictus (' and I) above. (;. The ;ipplicanl shall contribute a fair share Iowiird Ihe COSl ()1' Iriil'l'ic signals ;1[ any pro.jecl cnlra~cc or al Ihe intcrseclion of Vandcrbill l)rive lllld I ] lib Slreel. if ilild when deemed warr;mlcd by ('ountv. Such Iraffic signals ~hall be owilcd, operated atld maintained by ~l~c Counly. tl. Compensating righl-ol'-way liar lure lanes and median areas shall ~ dedicaled by reimburse Ibc ('otlfllv for Ibc use of existing righl-of-way li)llowing lhe procedure authorized by Seclion 2.2.20.3.7 of lhe ('oilier Counly l,aml l)evelopmenl Code. Such dedication shall be considered sile relaled illld Ihere shall be no roml impacl l~e credil to Ihe applicant. · 12B 6 WATER MANA(;I':MENT Thc devdopmcnl of Ibis Pill) Master l'h,n shall be subjcc! lo and governed by the following conditions: A. A copy of thc SI.R,VMI) Surface Waler F'ernlit or Early Work Permit with staff report is ~equircd prior m final conslruction plan approval. B. An l'~xca,.':ltion l'crmit will be required fl~r thc proposed lakes in accordance with Division 3.5 of the I.I)C and St'~VMI) rules. 5.9 UTll,iTIES The tlevdopmcrll of thi,; Iq 71) Master Phm shall bc sub. joel Io and govcrnctl by thc l'ollowi~;g ,:ontlitions: A. Water di~trihuti~m. ~cw;,gc collcclicm ami Ir;lllgnligsiorl lines t() serve the project arc t() bc designed, ccmstruc'~cd, conveyed. ;md/or ow~lcd ;md maintained in accordance with Collier ('otmly Ordmar~cc No. 97-17. as amended, and olhcr applicable C'ounty rules ami regulations. B. All customers connccling It) Iht walcr dislrihulion and sewage collcclion facilities m be conslructcd will he cusl()nlers ()I' Ihe ('ounlv mid will be billed by Ibc ('otlllty in ;IccordalK'c wiih the ('(mnly's cslabliMied i'alcN. ('. The <m-sile walcr distribulion system serving Iht prqject must be connecled Io the ~ ' ' - ,)lslr ct s water main mid nit,si be consislcnt wilh Ibc main sizing requirements specified i~, Ihe Cotmly's Water Masler Plan and extended throughout Ihe project. I)uring design of ihese facilities, the following fealurcs shall be inco~oratcd into the distribution system: I. I)ead-cnd mains shall include dead-end flushing hydrants. 2. Slt~bs for future syslcm imercom~cclhm with atl.jaccnt pmperlics shall be provided to thc properly lines ~f Iht projccl ill [ocalions to be mutually agreed lo by the ('ounlv ired the I)cvclopcr during Ibc design phase of thc pro. joel. I). Thc u~ililv collslrttction documents for Ibc pro. joel's sewerage system shall be prepared so Ihat all sewage flowing to thc ('ounlv's maslcr pump Slalion i~ transmilled by one { I } main on-site Dump slalion. I)uc lo thc design and configuralion {~I' thc master pump slalion, flow by gravity into the slalion will not be possible. The I)cvclopcr's engineer shall meet with the ('ot~nly slaff prior to COllllllCllcing prcpi~ralioll of conslrucli~m drawings s<~ Ihill all aspects of thc sewerage system design can be coordJ~lalcd wilh Iht ('ot~llv's Sewer Master l)lall. The exislmg off-site wilier facilities of the I)ixlrict must be evaluated for hvdr;tulic c;tpacilv to serve lhis pn~.j¢cl and reinforced as required, if necessary, consislent wilh the ('ountv's Wilier Nlasler Plan Io insure lhat tho i)istrict's water system call hydraulically provide a sufficient tlual~lily of water to meet Ihe anlicipated demands of lhe project and the Dislrict's exisling committed capacily. 5-4 ~ III II III IIII---- II ~ ~ ..... ,i .... IlIIIIll hydrmllic tape,oily I~ ~cr~'c Illi~ pm. joel ami impm¥cd m provide ;~dcqualc c~p;~cily I~ Ir;insp~rl Ibc :~ddili~m;d waslcw;~ler ~cncralcd 5,10 EN¥1R()NMI.]NTAI, Thc dc'.'cl(~pmcnl (~I' Ihi,, I'1:1 ) Ma,~Icr I)l:m xl~ll h.' ,,~II)iccl I() ;iml ~()vcmcd I~' thc I'(~lh~'inl A. l'~n~'ir()nmcnl~d i)crmllli~ shall bc in ;icc~nhmcc with thc ~mlc ~)I' ["l~)ri(I~ Rc~mrcc I'crmit Rules ;md bc subjccl t~ rcvic~' ;md approval by Ct,rrcnt I:r~vi~'~mmcnml I~cvicw SI;df. Rcm~v;d (~l' cx~lic vc~clalion ~lmll n~)l hc tile ~()lc mc;t;~x ~l' mil~aIi,m I'~r impacls I~ ('~dlicr' ('~)~nly .p~ri~dicli~m;d wclland~. II. All L'lJll~Cl'Villi()ll ill'tflX ~11;~11 bc tlcxJ~fl;llc~J ;~ ~'Oll~Cl'¥RliOll/j)rc~cr¥;llJi)ll Iriiclx or c;isClllCll[~ till ;iii c~mxlruclJ~m plan~ a~xl ~h~dl I)c rcc~nlcd ~m linc pl',~l wilh pmlcclivc c~)vcmml~ per ~' ximiku' Sccli~m 704.06 ~d' Iht I;l~rida 51;llJllc~. IIJ~l'I'cr~ ;~1(I ~clIx~ck~ ~h:~ll bc in ;~cc~rd:mcc wilh 3.Z.X..I.7..t .f d~c ('~llicr ('~xml¥ l.~md l)c¥cl~pmcn~ IIL~l'l'cr~ :~r(~nd prc~c~'cd .juri~dic~i~mal .~'c~l,md~ ~hall bc i~ ~JCC~rd:mcc wilh lhc Sm~c Iinvinmmc~m~l [~c~n~rcc I'crmil I~ulc~. I'rc~cr~cd .j~ri~(liclmnal ~'cllarld~ ~md xumxmdinl bufl'crx ~h:dl bc inc~q)~r:~cd i, ('~m~cr~ali~m Arc~x ~ h~ch ~l~all bc plallcd. J). Ail CXolJC ¥c~Cl;~lJ~m rc~v~l. IllollJl(~rJrl~. alibi m~inlc~l~ulcc {cx()lJc-frcc) [)J;m I'~r Ibc x~Ic. cmpImxJ~ ~m Iht c~m~crv:uJ(m'[)rc~crv;dnm~ arc~. ~h;~ll bc ~ubmJllcd I~ ('tlI'l'Cnl lL~winmmcnml I~cvicw ~mff Ibr review ;md ;~ppn~¥;d prior m I'imd silo pl~m,conslrucli()~[ plan ;~ppmv;Jl. Ii. Thc I)cvcl~pcr ~hall c~m~l)ly will~ ~hc luidclir)c~ ;md rcc(mm~cnd;lli(m~ ~f ~hc t"l(~rid',~ (k~mc I:. In Ibc cvc~l Iht [)n)jCCl (l~cx n~l require pl',ulin~. :~ll c~m~c~'ali~m ;u'cax xh;dl bc rcc(~rdcd Ci)II~CI'¥111Ji)I1 J)rc~cF¥;iIJOll II'i~CIX or Cil~crllClll~ dcdicalcd m an appn)vcd CIllJI¥ oI' [~) ('~unlv ~vilh n(~ rC~lXm~ibililv I'~r ~minlcmmcc ~md ~ub. jccl I~ Iht uxcx and Ii[uilali~m~ ~imilar ~r ;~ per I.'h,'id:~ ~I~lIJllC~ Sccli~m 704.06. (]. A ?phcr I~rl~i~c ~J~r¥cv and roll,calibre m:m;~cmcnl pl:m xlmll bc xubmitlcd I~ ('urrcnl I'lannir~ ILn~ inmmcnlal SlaI'I' I'~r rcvJc~v and appn~v:d pri~r m I'in~d XJlc [)lan c~mxlruclhm ;~ppn~v;~l. A c~p> ~l' Iht rch~c:~li~m m~ma~cmc~l phm ~h:dl I,c included ~m Ibc I'im~l 5-5 ~ Illllll II III - I Ilrl · 12B 5.11 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Accessory structures shall b¢ constructed sitnuhancously with or following thc construction of thc principal .,;Irtl¢lurc cxccpl Ihal temporary sales bt,iidings. Irailcrs. marketing fi,cilities, contractors' storage ilfl~l office facilities and thc likc. may be erected :md t,tilizcd during tile pcricxl of pro. jeer development arid marketing..',;uch temporary building.x shall be removed upon completion of thc marketing or construction actJvily which they arc accessory to. 5.12 SI(;NS All signs shall comply v.'ilh I)ivision 2.5 of Iht I.and I)cvclopmcn! C'odc in cf feet iai thc time of building permil applicati{m. 5.13 I.ANDSCAI'iN(; FOR ()I"I"-STREI'71' I'ARKIN(; AREAS All hmdsc:tping for el'f-street parking arc;is shall bc in accordance with thc I)i,.'ision 2.4 of 111o i,:lnd I)c','clopnlcnl ('{~dc in cf foci al life lira0 of building permit ;q'~plicali{m. 5.14 i'R()VISi()N i"()R ()I'T'-SI'I'I,; REMOVAl, ()F i';ARTlll,;N MATERIAl, Thc cxcaxation of earthen material and its stockpiling in preparation of water management facilities or othcrxt Nc dcxclop x~ atcr bodies is hereby permitted, if it is demonstrated that fill aclivilics on those bt~ildablc p~rli(ms of the project site arc such that there is a su~lus of carillon material, then its off-sil0 tlisp~sal is also hereby pcrmilled sub.joel lo thc following conditions: I. F, xca,,'alior~ aclivilics shall comply wilh thc definition ol'a "development excavation" pursu;ml lo l)ivision 3.5 of the l,and l)cvelopmcnt Code whereby off-sil0 removal shall be limited lo ten percent (to ;t nmxinmm of 2().000 cubic vartls) of thc total voltlmC cxc;tvalcd unless a commcrci;fl cxcav;llion permit is received. 2. All other provisions of said I)ivision 3.5 arc applicable. 5-6 12B 8 Naptes Daily News Naptes, FL Affidavit of Pubtication Naples Daily tiers ................................................................... 0110 ""' NOTI~.E OF: INTENT TO CONSIDER ~ ~ I$ h~eev g~en~ ~ARD OF C~NTY C~[SSI~ERS ATTN: NANCY SAL~UB ~ PO ~X &1~016 ~' that en TUESDAY, NAPLES FL 34101-~16 ~m~, ~d F~, Ce~, 3~1 E~t Tom~ ~ Tr~, e~e~, F~. . ~d ~ C~ ~- ml~ w;ll ~s~r REFERENCE: ~1210 ~551 ~~~d~°C~ ~e. The 5765~0~ t~T~CE OF 1NTEtlT TO ~11 C~me~e ~ A~. The rifle ~ ~ State of Florida C~nty of Collier AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDI. Before the u~ersign~ authority, ~rsonatLy NANCE NUMBER a~ar~ B. Laeb~ ~ ~ ~th says that ~he ~erves e1.102, ~ AMENDED, T~ COLLIER COUNTY aS the Assistant Cor~rete Secretary of the Naples LAND ~L~NT 0aJ[y tle~s, e daily n~s~per ~bLJshed at Naples, CODE WHICH CLUDES THE COM- in Co[liar C~nty, Florida: that the attach~ PREHENSIVE ZONING J copy of advertising ~as published ~n said REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORP~AT. newspaper on dates [ist~. ED AREA OF C~LIER Afftant further says that the said Naples 0ai Ly COUNTY, FL~IOA BY AMENDING T~ OFFI. tiers is a newspaper published at Naples, in said CIAL ZONING ATLAS Collier C~nty, FLorida, and that the said ~AP NUmaR BY CHANGING THE newspaper has heretofore been continu~sLy ZONING CLASSIFICA. ~b[fsh~ in said Collier County, Florida, each TION OF ~E ~REIN day a~ has been enter~ as second class ~il DESCRIBED REAL PROPEPTY FRO~ ~tte~ at the ~st office in Naples, in said RMF.6 Collier County, FLorida, fo~ a peri~ of 1 yeaP AND ~F-12(6) TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT next prec~i~ the first ~bLicati~ of the DEVELOPMENT attach~ c~y of edvertise~nt; a~ affiant KNOWN AS THE DU~S F~ A ~IXED I further says that she has neithe~ paid ~e RE~NTIAL ~L- promis~ any person, firm or co~rati~ any ~NT L~D ON , THE NOETHWEST discount, rebate, commission or refund for the CORNER OF IllTH puT.se of securi~ this advertisement fo~ AVENUE NORTH publication in the said newspaper. (BL~BILL A~E · AL~ KNOWN AS C.R. ~) AND VAN~RBIC~ PUBLZSHED ~i: 03/18 ~1~ (C~. ~I), FUR. T~R ~R~ED AS LOTS 1 THRU 10. BLOCK 1, ALL OF BL~K 2 AND LOTS THRU 16, BLOCK WIGGINS PASS LA~: INGS UNIT =1. AND LOTS I T~U 4 BL~K AD SPACE: 116.~ JglCH 1, WIGGINS' PASS FZLED ~: 03/18/98 LANDINGS UNiT =1 ~mT~N, IN ~CTION ; ...................... ~T~. .~.~ Signature of Affiant // ) ~ '~ TINGT%E~T'~C~LI~.5 CON~A~EsC~N' . ~ M~E ~ LE~; AND S~orn to and Subscribed before me this/ d4y of ) ~/'; '- 1; BY PROV~ING AN EF- FECTI~ DATE. Personally known by me . /. ,','/. ~' , . '~ .. , ~: BIs~ ~ Pr~ ~- / ~eme~ ~rvlces, Inc., rearesentlng Slgnoture /' Communities, Inc., re- kno~ OS The Dunes Planned Unit Devel~- me~ f~ a m~tmum ~1 m~-f~lly ~111~ ' ~e ~al~ f~ I~- '' .: ~.,~r~.,iry lB fl~ All I~rest~ Any ~ ~ ~e ~d will ne~ a ra- ced ~ ~e ~e~olnlng ~ereto ~e ~ a v~m D OF EOUNTY COLLIER COUNTY BARBARA B. DWIGHT E. BROCK, ~RK ORDINANCE HO. 98- 24 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES 'I'}tE COMPREftENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 8520S; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM RMF-6, RMF-12ST(6) AND RMF-12(6) TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DE'/ELOPMENT KNOWN AS THE DUNES FOR A MIXED PE:2',D[<~iTIAI, DEVELOPMENT, I,OCATED ON THE NORTHWEST COP.!~ER OF 111TM AVENUE NORTH (BLUEBILL AVENUE - AI,f;C) K[IOWN AS C.R. 8'16) AND VANDERBILT DRIVE (C.R. 901!, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 THRU !0, BLOCK 1, ALL OF BLOCK 2 AHD LOTS 1 THRU 16, BLOCK 3, WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT ~1, AND LOTS 1 THRU 4, BLOCK i, WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS Unit #1 ADDITION, [~: SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COU!ITY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 88.5 ACRES MORE OR LESS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. W!II.iP, EA.q, Karen Bishop of Proj~:ct Management Service:s, !nc., representing Signature Communities, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described rea] property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners ,of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from RMF-6, RMF-12(6) and RMF-12ST(6) to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with The Dunes PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated b'? referenc:e herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number 8520S, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordfnance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. !2B 6 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this -' - day of , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COM~4ISSIONERS COI,LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency Harjc~rie M. Student Assistant County Attorney -2- THE DUNES A PI.ANNEI) UNIT DEVEI,OPMENT RFX;III.ATI()NS AND SUPP()RTING MASTER PI.AN (;()VF. RNING TIlE DUNES. A PLANNED IINIT I)EVEI.()PMENT. PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF TI IE C()I.I.II.;R ('()tiN'fY I.AND DEVF. I.()PMENT (7()DE PREPARED F()R: SIGNATURE COMMUNITIES. INC. PREPARED BY: PMS. INC. OF NAPLES 2335 TAMIAMI TRAIl. N()RTII S UITF. 408 NAPI.ES. FLORIDA 34103 DATF. REVIEWED BY ('('P(' I),VI'I.; APPR()VEI) BY B('(' 3/24/98 ()RI)INAN('E NUMBER 98-24 AMI:'NDMENTS AND REPF. A[. F~XH I B I T "A" 12f:t 6 TABI,E OF ~ONTENT$ PAGE LIST OF I£XIIII?,ITS iii STATF. MENT OF COMPLIANCE iv SECTION ! PROPERTY OWNF. RStilP. I.E(;AI, AND GENERAl. I)ESCRIIrFION I-I Ihrough 1-2 SECTION 2 PROJECT I)EVI~I.OPMENT 2- I fl~rough 2-5 SECTION 3 RESIDENTIAl. i)EVEI.OPMENT AREAS 3-1 fl~rough 3-3 SECTION 4 PR~SERVI~ I)ISTRIC'F 4-I lhrou~h 4-2 SEC'r~ON s GENERAl. I)I~VELOPMI~NT COMMFFMENTS 5-I through 5-6 EXlllBIT "A' PUl) MASTER PI,AN 12B 6 ,FT FEXlilBITS EXHIBIT #A PUD Master Plan III 1 ?B STATEMENT OF COMPI,IANCE The development of approximately ~8.55 acres of property in Collier County as a Planned Unil I)evelopmenl Io be known as The I)uncs will be in compliance wifl~ Ihe goals, objcclivcs, and policies of Collier County as sci fimh in thc Growlh Mana~cmcnl Plan. The l)uncs is Io ~ a mulli-familv residential and ass~'iatcd rccrealional use pro.ioof Ihal will be consislenl wilh applicable clemenls of thc Collier Growlh Man:~cmcnl Plan for Ibc following rcas~ms: I. Traffic ways. mililics, and oflmr public I'acili~ics necessary m serve Thc I)uncs projcc~ arc adcqualc. Thc l)uncs will participate in lhc expansion of existing public I'acililics lo the extent of ils impact on those facilities vii~ payment of impact fees. 2. Thc I)uncs project will ~ compi~liblc with and complimcnl~ry io existing and planned iand uses in Ihc vicinily. Projccl lands lic in a lransilion area which includes Iow-risc rcsidcntiu', dcvch~pmcnl m~d high-rise multi-family development. 3. Thc pmpcny was down zoned during the Zoning Rc-cvalualion Process which resulted in an action establishing RMF 6 and RMF 12 (6) zoning districts essentially establishing a (Icnsitv of six (6) dwelling units per acre and mixed residential land uses. The properly contains a gross acreage o~'88.55 acres and based on a density of six (6) dwelling units per gross acre. thc PUD provides for I]vc hundred and thirty one (531) dwelling units. This action makes the land usc and density consistent wilh the Future Land Usc Element of thc Growth Management Plan. 4. I)cvch~pmcnl commitmcnls contained within this PUl) will ensure that dcvclopmcnl of thc subject property will proceed in a manner consistent with applicable clcmcnls of Ibc (;rowth Managemenl Plan. SIi()RT TITI,E This ordinance shall he known and cited as lite "TtlI'; I)UNES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OR DINA NCE". 12B 6 SECTION I PROI'ERTY OWNERStlIP. i,E(;AI, AND GENERAl, DESCRIIrFION 1.1 PURI'OSE Thc purpose of this Section ix to set forth the location and ownership of thc property, and to describe thc existing conditions {71' thc properly proposed lo bc developed under lhc projccl name of TttE I)UNES. 1.2 i,E(;AI, i)ESCRllrI'I()N All h, nd (lots and dcdicmcd arc:,s) described in and made subject to thc plats {71' Wig,;ins Pass Landings Unit I as recorded in Plat I]ook I0. Page 44. of thc Public Rccords of Collier County. Florida and Wiggins Pass I.andings Unit I Addition as rccordcd in Plat Book 10. F':~gc 81. of thc Public Records of Collier County. Florida. W_~jl~ins Pass I,anding.8_~nit i Beginning at thc Southeast comer of Section 20. Township 48 south, Range 25 cast. Collier County. Florida. run N g9%52' 2()" W. along thc Soulh linc of said Section 20. Ik~r 2053.75 feel. to thc point of beginning of Bakcr-Camfll Point. as recorded in Plat book 8. page 42 of the public records of Collier County. Florida; thence run N 0%14' 00" W. for 1698.90 feet; thence run N 34G 26' 15" i£. for 439.48 feet: thence run N 87%4g' 00" E, for 1481.48 feet:, thence run S 02%12' 00" E. for 163.77 feel: thence run N g7%48" 00" E, for 250.00 feet. 1(7 thc East line of s:,id Section 20: thence run S 02%12' 00" E. :,long said East line for 1970.19 feet, to the point {71' beginning, also less and except thc Southerly 1298.93 feet of thc Easterly 649.46 feet thereof; less and except the Southerly 90.00 feet and thc Easterly 50.00 feet thereof for highway purposes. ~ins Pass l,anding~ Unit I Addition A subdivision of thc Soulhcrly 1298.93 fcct of the Easterly 649.46 feet of Section 20 Township 48 south. Range 25 cast. ('oilier County. I:h)rida. less Ibc Easterly 50 l~cl thereof and less thc Southerly 9() foci Ihcrcof. containing 16.65 acres. 1.3 I'R()i'ERTY OWNERSlilI' A.L. l)oughcily Ct).. Inc.. a l)clawarc Corporation. Ray ttcllcr, lh, l l'arlcnhcin~cr. Floyd J. Ramm. l)al¢ L. Rish, and l)avid L. Brennan. as trustees of I)elnor Neptune Properties. per I)cchm, tion of Trust under Ohio law. l)clnor Enterprises Unit I I Partners. an Ohio General Partnership. l)elnor Towers t init 9. Inc.. an Ohio Corporation. I-I 12B G. !.4 GENERAl. I)ESCRIIrFION OF PROi'I';RTY ARI';A A. Thc project site ix I{x:atcd in thc northwcs! quadrant of Ihc intersection o1' Blucbill Avenue and Vandcrbilt Drive. and is bounded ~m thc Wcsl by thc Baker-Carroll Point Subdivision Plat as recorded in Plat ii,ink 8 Page 42. {~1' thc Public Records of Collier County. Florida. Thc property is bounded on thc North by jurisdictional wetlands, on thc East by Vandcrbiit Drive. and tm thc Soulh by Bhtcbill Avenue. !.5 I'llYSICAI, i)ESCRII~TI()N Thc project extends cast l'mm llakcr-C'am'~ll Point on thc West and includes pa~ oI' the manmadc waterway on thc West. I~ inangmvc l'orcsts, t~ a beach dtlnc vcgclalcd with Sctlbby I'inc Ilatwoods. Natural drainage t~l' Ihe upland porlion o1' the property is westerly and north:fly into wetlands which b{~rdcr tidal WalCrs. Walcr managclncnt fi,r thc pm. joel will bc thc c~,;slruclcd water storage lypc. cilhcr lilkc {}r crc;tied wetland marsh lypc. {,r ;l ctmlbination o1' lilt Iwo. Storm waters which exit thc st{~ragc ilrCtlS will dt~ s~ via one or 111oi'c comml strtlClttrcs which arc aulhori/cd ;is ;I p;irl of Iht NV;tier M;lllagClllClll pCFInilS issued by ('oilier ('(,tllllv and thc South Florida Water Management I)islrict. Topography wilhin Iht project is varied, fringing from sca level to 12~ l'ccl ;drove sca level. Thc entirety oI' thc silo. except for thc mangrove l'ringc along Ihc Wcsl bouncli.'v of Ibc propcr~y, lies Wilhin Flood ~{mc AE (EI~ I I') ;recording m FIRM Panel ()189E. Soil types within thc pro. jeer include II;tsinger Fine Sand. I)urbin and WulfeFt Mucks. and [lrb;in I.;md Sillcllilc ('~mlplcx. The l)uncs project ,,,.'ill t',c a multi-Family residential and recreational I';Icililies community which will be developed wilh it maximum of 531 dwelling units. The buildings shall no! exceed a h¢i,ghl of one hundred and twcnlv-livc (125) Fccl above Ibc Mean l'lood Elevation cslablishcd by Itlw i,s illuslratcd on the Master Plan. 12B 6 SECTION I1 i'ROJECT DEVEI,Oi'M ENT 2.1 i'URI'OSI': Thc purpose of this section is to generally describe Iht project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracls included in the project, its well edict pro jet! relationships. 2.2 GENERAl, A. I)cvclopmcn! of Thc l)unes shall be in accordance with Iht conlcnl of this Planned t;ni' I)cvclopmcnl documcnl and applicable sccli~ms of the Collier County Land I)cvclopmcnl Code and (;rowlh Management Plan in cfi'cot at Iht time of issuance of any development order, such as bul not limited to Final SuNlivision I)lat. Final Sil0 I)cvclopmcnt Plan. Excavation I'crmil. anti Preliminary Work Aulhori/alion. to which such regt~lalions relate. Where these regulalions fail Io provide developmental slitndards. Ihen Ihe provisions of the most similar district in the County l.and I)evelopment Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, lhe del'inilions of all lerms shall ~ lhe same as the definitions set forth in Ihe Collier County Land Development ('ode in el'lkct at the time of building permit application. ('. All conditions imposed and all graphic material prescnictl depicting restrictions for the devclopmcnl of The Dunes sJlitJJ become pan t~l' thc rcguh~tions which govern thc manner in which the I'J~l) site may be developed. I). t~nless modified, waived or excepted by this Pt:i). thc provisions of Ihe LI)C. where applicable. remain in full force ;Jnd cf foci wilh respect to the development of the hind which comprises lhis I'Ui). Ii. I)cvclopmcn! pcrmitlcd hcrcl',y will he st,l',jcct ~o concurrency review t, nder the provisions of l)ivi.'iion 3.15. Adequate I'ublic Facililics. 2.3 I)ESCRlirl'i()N ()F i'R().Ji']C'I' I'I,AN ANI) I'R()I'()SEI) I,ANI) USES A. Thc project Master Plan. including I;.lyotll of streets and use of land for tile various parcels, is ilh,stra~ed graphically by Exhibit "A". thc PUl) M,,;ter l)evelopment Plan. Tile nature and extent of lilll¢l uses within the pro.jet! is indicated by thc following table: 2-1 12E ~ILISII,~,, NTENSITYS MMARY USE MAX. D.U.'s ACRES Rcsidcnlial 531 85.55 2.4 REI,ATI';i) i'R().Ii';CT PI,AN AI'I'R()VAI, IlI';QUIREMI';NTs A. Prior to Iht recording ol a Record I'lal. ;md/or Condominium Plat all or part of thc PLJD. final phms for all required improvements shall receive approval of thc appropriate Collic~ t.'ounly govemmcnlal agcncic~ lo insure compliance with thc PUl) Maslcr Plan. the Collier ('ounty l.and l)cvcl,,pmcnt C,,dc. and I}lC platling laws of thc Stale of Florida. if applicable. l£xhibit "A". Ih¢ l'tJl) Mis,.lcr I'lan. omslitulcs thc required Iqll) I)cvclopmcnt I'hm. Subsequent to or concurrent with PtH) Hppr(wal. a I'rcliminary Subdivision Plat. if applicable, shall be submitted for thc entire area covered by thc I'UI) Master Plan or alternatively fi)r p(mions or phases of il as dcvch>pcd. Any division (,I' land and Ibc clcvclopmcnl of thc hind shall bc in compli;mcc with Division 3.2 ¢~1' thc ('oilier County Land I)cvclopmcnt C{~c. and die plaiting ]ilX~'~ of thc SI;lle of Florida. C. The provisions of I)ivision 3.3 of the Collier Cot, nty Land l)cvelopment Code. when applicable. sh:dl ;~pply to tile development of all pl;Hlcd tracts or parcels of land its provided in said I)ivision prior to tile issu;mcc of a building pcrmil or other development order. D. The development of ;tn5, tract tlr parcel approved for residential dev¢loprr~enl contemplating simple ownership of hind I'or each dwelling unit shall be required lo submit and receive approval of a Preliminary Subdivision I'lat in conformance with requirements of Division 3.2 of thc Collier County i.;Hltl I)cvclopmcnl ('ode prior Io thc submillal of construction plans and a Final Subdivision Plat Ik~r ;my such porlion of thc Iract or parcel. Utility. road. public, private, cascnlcrHs sh;tll bc established as required dr,ring tile SI)P and/or phil appr(w;d process. F. Appropriate instruments ',,,'ill bc provided ;ti lilt time oF inl'raslructurc improxcmcnts regarding dedic;tlions ;md tile mcthod I'or providing pcrpclu;tl m;tinlemmce o1' common facilities. 2.5 MOl)El, iI{)MES/SAIA,;S OFFICES M(KIe[ JlOlllt2. s;lJes ccnlcrs and olher uses and slrttcltH'cs l'cJHtcd to thc pronlOlion ;tlld s;lJc of i'cHI cslatc such as. bul not limited t(). pavilions, viewing plalforms, gazebos, parking arc;ts, lents, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses thr(mghoul The I)uncs Community subject to the requirements of Section 2.6.33.4 of thc Collier County Land I)cvclopmcnt code. 2-2 12B 6 2.6 AMENI)MENTS T() I'Ui) I)OCUMENT ()R PUl) MASTER PI,AN Amendments may be made to this PUl) Ordinance ;ss provided in thc Collier County l.and Development C~Xlc. Section 2.7.3.5. 2.7 ASS()CIATION OF I'ROiq.;RTY ()WNER.% FOR COMMON ARE:S, MAINTENANCE Common area maintenance will be provided by a Master l'mpcrly O~vncrs' Association to hc crcalcd by thc dcvclopcr. Thc propcny <~wncrs' association shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance, and nmnagcmcnt of thc surface water and stormwalcr managemenl SySICIllS. alld preserves serving The l)uncs (',mmunity. in accordance with the provisi{ms of this I'[Jl). together wilh any applicalqc permits from Iht Florida l)eparlmcnt of Environmcnlal Prolcclion. tJ.S. Amly Co~s of Engineers. :,,d Soulh Florida Walcr Managemenl l)islrict. 2.8 I,ANI)SCAI'E I~t;I"FI:,RS, BERM, Fi';NCES ANI) WAI,i,S l:mdscapc buffers, ~rms. Iknces. arid walls are generally pcrmiltcd as a principal usc Ihroughot, The Dunes ('ommunitv. The f(}llowing standards can be altered al thc time of site phm approval by the Development Sca'icc l)ireclor: A. I,andscapc bemls shall have the following maximum side slopes: I. Grassed berms 4:1 2. (;round covered ~rms 3:1 3. I{ip-Rap bcrms I'1 4. Slmctural walled berms - vertical B. Fence or wall maximum hcight: six l¥c~ (6). ;tx mcasurcd from thc finished gradc of thc ground at the base of Ihc fence ()r wall. For the pt,'p<~c of this provision, finished grade shall be considered ,) be no grcatcr lhan eighteen inches (I 8")above thc highest crown elevation of Ihe nearest existing road unless the fence or wall is constructed on a perimeter landscape berm. In Ihcse taxes thc wall shall not exceed six l~et (6') in height from thc top of berm elevation for berm elevation with an average side slope of 4:1 or less. and shall not exceed four feel (4') in height l'mm Ihe ,}p of berm elevation for bcrms wifll an average side slope of greater lhan 4: I (i.e. 3:1 ). C. l.andscape buffers, berms, fences and walls may be constructed along the perimeter of The l)uncs Community I'Ul) boundary prior to subdivision plat or site development plan submimd. All such are;ts must be included in a landscape buffer easement on final plats, or in a separate recorded instrument. 2-3 12B I). The South 25 feel of the property will be :~vailable for use by Ihe owners of the Dunes Projccl anti by Collier County under Ihe conditions herein scl fl)rlh. The area shall serve as a landscape buFlYr for the l)unes Ibat will incorporate hmtlscaping to buffer the Project from Ibc adjoining right of way. It may also inco~orate a wall or Fence meeting county requirements. The area shall aim be available lk}t' use by ('oilier County to incorporate a sidewalk, benches, storm sewers and vehicle lurnarounds m be used in conjunclion with a phmncd counly park ami p~rking area. This area will be established as such in any plat of the property and a mm-exclusive easement shall be provided Io ('ollier County lhal will resWict and limit public use to use in conjunction with the proposed park and parking area as and when developed. Thc l)evelopcr shall construct thc landscaping and sidewalks within tl~c area. Such improvements arc site related and are nol eligible for impact fee credits. All other improvements relaled to thc proposed park ami parking will be consln~ctcd by Collier County but may be construclcd by thc I)cvclopcr al its election, and al its expense, and subjccl to npproval from the County Parks l)irccmr. If 11~¢ I)eveloper elecls to and docs c~mxtruct such ,>~hcr improvements riley will be eligible for county park impact fee credit. All setbacks x,'ill be mcaxured fi'om Ibc xmHh property linc and thc foregoing area will tm included in ibc sclback. 2.9 DESIGN (;Uli)EI.INES AND STANI)ARI)S Thc establishment of a Phmncd Unit l)evclopmcnt is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagin~,tion in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control, as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code. Section 2.2.20. I. The l)unes ('ommunitv is phmned ;as a privalc, l'unclionally interrelated communilv under unified control, m be developed over an extended time period. Thc developer will cstablis~ comnnmitv-wide design guidelines and standards to ensure a high and consistent level of quality for community ~atures and tirol I i tics. which include items such as hmdscaping, hardscapc, waterscapes, signagc, l ighling. pedestrian systems, bicycle paths, pavement trcatmcnls, roadway medians. Iknces. walls, bul'l~rs, berms and other similar Facilities. The l)cveloper will achieve the above objectives bv means of recorded covenants, conditions, and restrict ions. 2-4 12S 8 2.10 GENERAl, PERMITTEI) USES Ccrlain uses shall bc considered general permitted uses fl'~roughout Tile Dunes Community PUD except in the Preserve District. General pcrmiued uses arc those uses which generally serve the Developer and residents of The Dunes Comnn, nity and are typically part of the common infrastructure or are considered community facilities. A. General Pcrnlittcd Uses: 1. Essential services as set forth under tile Collier Counly Land l)cvclopmcnt Code. Section 2.6.9.1. 2. Water managemen! facilities and related structures. 3. l,akcs including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural bank treatments. 4. Guardhouses. galchot~ses, and access control .structures. 5. Neighborhood parks, recreational facilities and community centers. 6. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and tile l)o.'elopcr's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways. parking areas and related uses. 7. Landscape features including, but not limited to. hmdscape buffers, berms, fences and walls sub, jeer to tile standards set forth in Section 2.8 of ti'tis PUl). 8. Any other usc which is comparable in nature with tile foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible. B. l)evelopmcnt Standards: Unless otherwise set forth in ti'tis document, life following development standards shall apply structures: I. Setback from back of curb or edge of pavement of any road - Fifteen feet (15') except for guard houses, gatehouses, and access control structures which shall have no required setback. 2. Setback from property lines - Twenty (20') feet. 3. Minimum distance bctwccn structures which itrc part of an architecturally unified grouping - Five feet (5'). 4. Minimum distance between unrelated structures -Ten feet (10'). 6. Minimum floor area - None required. 2-5 1213 6 7. Mininmm Iol or parcel ;u'ca - None required. 8. Sidewalks, bikcpaths, and cal'tpaths may be placed within County required buffers: however the wi(llh of tile required buffer shall be increased proporli<matcly lo thc widlh of lhe paved surface of Ibc sidcwalk, bikcpath, or cartpath. 9. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and olher land uses where such standards arc not ~pccil'icd hercin, arc I<) be in accordance with the Collier Cot~nly Land Development Code in effect ;tl thc lime ~1' Silo l)cvch)pmcnl Plan appr¢)v;tl. 2.11 OPEN SPACES REQUIREMENTS The I'tII) Master I'hm identifies ;~pproximalcly 53 acres includcd in tile I~ccrcation. Land.;capc/Opcn Space. l.akes ;,nd Preserve l)istrict designations. These areas fully satisfy the open space rc:.luircmcnts of Section 2.6.27 and .%cction 2.6.32 of thc ('oilier County l~and l)evclopmcnt Codc. 2.12 NATIVE VE(;I,;TATI()N RETi.;NTION I~i';QI~IRI,;MI.;NTS Twenly Five Percent/259; )of thc vmhlc naturally functi(ming native vcgclalioil on silo shall bc preserved. 2-6 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to establish land use regulations and development standards for the residential development areas indicated on Exhibit "A", the PUD Master Plan. 3.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS The maximum number of dwelling units permitted in the entire PUD is 531. The property contains a gross acreage or' 88.55 acres ami based on a density of six (6) dwelling units per gross acre, tee PUD provides for five hundred and thirty one (531) dwelling units. This action makes the land ,.~.e and density consistent with the Fulurc Land Usc Element of the Growth Management Plan. Distribution of the dwelling units in the residential ~u'cas is not predetermined, and may occar as authorized via Site Development Plan approval. 3.3 GENERAL DESCRII~FION Areas designated "R" on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of residential dwelling types, compatible nonresidential uses, a full range of recreational facilities, essential services, and customary accessory uses. Final tract configuration and actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with Division 3.3 and Division 3.2, respectively, of the Collier County l~md Development Code. Residential tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways, open spaces, parks and amenity areas, lakes and water management facilities, and other similar uses found in residential areas. 3.4 USES PERMITTED " A. Principal Uses I. Multi-family dwellings including garden apartments. 2. Single-family attached/detached and townhouse dwellings. 3. Public parking lot. B. ..Accesso~ Uses I. Uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted. 2. Private boathouses and docks, subject to Sec. 2.6.21 of the Collier County Land Development Code. The approval for overnight docking is subject to a conditional use application to be presented to the Board of County Commissioners. 3-I 3. Rccrcalional facilities Il'mi serve as an inlcgral part of thc residential development and have been designated, reviewed and approved (ma site development phm or preliminaD' subdivision plat for lhat development. Recreational facililies may include, but are nol limited Icl clubhouse, communiiy center building and tennis facilities, parks, phtygrouncls and playrields. 4. Recreational facilities and amenities l'or use by residents of Ibc residential Iracts. 3.5 I)EVEI,Oi~'MENT STANI)ARI)S A. Table I sets I'm'th thc development slandards for land uses wilhin Ihe "R" Residential l)is~rict. B. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and olhcr land uses where such standards arc :~ol specified herein arc to be in accordance with Collier County Land Development Coctc i~ effect itt the time of Site l)cvclopmcnl Plan approvi, I. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights. and floor area slanchtrds apply Io principal structures. D. Development standards for uses not specifically set forth in Table I shall be established during the Site Development F'htn approval its scl l'orlh in Division 3.3 of the Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of tile zoning district which is most similar to thc proposed usc. E. In Ibc case o1' residential structt~res with a comrnon architectural theme, required property development regulations may be waived or reduced its provided by the provisions in Article 2. Division 2.6. Scclion 2.6.27.4.6 of thc Collier County Land Development Code. All yards, setbacks, etc. shall be in relation to tile individual parcel boundaries, except its otherwise provided for by this document, or except its authorized via the Site Development Phm approval process. 3-2 ' ................... II II I II .......... II I Id 12B TilE DUNES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR TABI.E DEVELOi'MENT SIN(;I,E FAMII,Y MULTI. IIlGII.RISE STANDARDS ATTACIIEI) ANI) FAMII.Y ] MULTI-FAM TOWNIIOUSE DWEi. I.INGS I~ DWELLIN(;S ii Parcel R-2 Parcel R-2 ~ Parcel.,; I-~ Minimum 3.{~ SF N'A [ N'A ..... Lot Area Minimum l,ot ~Vidlh '~ 30 150 N/A Front Yard 20" 25 o.5 BH Front Yard fl)r Side Entry Garage I{1 15 N/A Side Yard '~ () or .5 Btl '~ 0.5 BIt 0.5 Rear Yard ' Principal ~ 20 Btt B H Rear Yard Acce~ry IO 15 15 Rear Yard '~ I~ 0.5 Blt 0.5 BH Maximum Bldg lleight .z 35 45 125' or 12 stories Distance Between Principal Structures 0.5 SB}t 0.5 SBH 0.5 SBH Floor Area 12(x) Si: I{R~) SF 12(R) SF - Min. (S.F.) ~: [hfilding IlcigM SBll:(Sum .f Iluilding Ilcigh[): (',,mhmcd hcighl .f Ix~. :ldlaccnl braidings I',,r tl~c purI~,~c~ .f determining setback requirements. zcr. (0') f'cct except Ihat ahcn abutting 11 lake .r x~iltcr hxJ% an architcclural hank trcallBC*ll shall ~' inc.rl~,ratcd init) thc design. Frnnt yards shall ~' measured ;ts h ,11,,~ s A. If Ibc parcel ix sca'cd h) a puhlic righl-of.~s ay. sclback ~s mcasurctl Ir.m Ibc ;idjatcn[ righl-.l'.~av hnc. I1. Ir thc parcel is served by ;t priv;dc n,ad. sclb;Ick is Illt'ilstlrct] t'rt~rll Ibc back ~1 ['urh (II' cur~'d) i}r cdgc .f p;l~ CllK'n[ (If II~}l curtK'd). '2 - Buildings shall m,t cxcccd a height ~d'.nc hundred and Ix~cnl)-Ii~c Il 25) feel at~xc Moab }"h,,~l Elcx alhm cstahlishcd b5 I;I~V lis d~t:.qr:ltcd ~,n thc Master Plan. '3 - Singlc-fitmily allachcd dx~cllings ~ghich pr-~ idc fi,r 2 p:lrkmg M,accs ~ill~in an cnclnsct] garage and provide fi~r gucsl parking other lhan in privalc drtvcxsax'~ mas reduce thc frnm yard rcquircmcm I. 5' I'nr Ibc garage and 15' fi,r thc remaining stmclurcs. ' ' '4 - Tx'to l~'cl {{}') i*r a mmimtml .f five I~'ct 15'} im c~lhcr side except that x~hcrc thc/er, l~'cl {O'} yard .ptinn is uliG/cd. Iht -p~silc side nf Ibc slmcturc shall haxc a Ion li~t { I0'~ yard. 7x'rn fccl Ill'} 5artls may ~' used .n I~11} Miles of a struclurc pr.~ tdcd Ihal n. st~clurc i*n any adjoining h,t lies svidm~ ten { IO) fcct .f a/cro MI slrt/t'ltlrc. ' '5 - Minimum h)l width Hilly ~' reduced by 2()c~ f.r cul-de-sac I.ls pn,x idcd Ibc minimum h,t area rcquircmcnl is maintained. '6. Tx'ri* fccl lid fl~l prnvisi.n d~ws Illlj apply I,* any cxlcrior ~all .f a strut'lure add is irllcndcd h~ apply Il* Iht ClilIlllIilll x~;llJ i~r wall ahlllg inlcritsr Jol lines x~ idun a series .f h~wnJl,)tl%~' nr ~Crlli-dclilchcd ii[lilS. ' , auth~srl/ctl rct'rc;d~,na[ ;llllcnlty (lc. l>.,ls. H~as. landscal~, f'CaltlrcM Utc.) Ilia> I~' h~atcd ~silllill zero {111 loci ~*1' ;I side hq linc adjacent Ibc s~'all ~,f' it residence ~ilh ri. s~ iml,~w .~.nmg. 3-3 12B 6 SECTION IV I~RI';SI'~RV E i)ISTRICT 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within Thc Dunes Community designated on tile Master Phm its Preserve District. 4.2 GENERAl, I)ESCRIPTION Areas designated its I)rcscrvc on Iht Master Plan arc designed to accommodate a full range of conservation and limited water management uses and functions. Thc primary propose of tile Pt'cscrve District is Io retain viable naturally functioning wetland and xeric upland systems, to allow restoration and enhancement of impacted or degraded wcthmd systems, and to provide an op :n space amenity for thc enjoyment of The l)uncs Comrnunily residents. 4.3 PERMITTEI) USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or parl thcrcof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used. in whole or in part. for ()liter than the following: A. l~crmiltcd Principal Uses and Structures I. Passive recreational areas, boardwalks, including recreational shelters and restrooms. 2. Biking. hiking, nature and equestrian trails (excluding asphah paved trails in wetlands). 3. Water m;magcrncnt facilities, slructures and lakes, including hikes with bulkheads or other arcltitcctural treatnlcnts. 4. Any ()liter conservation and related open space activity or use which is con~pantble in nature with the foregoing uses and which Iht l)cveh)pmcnt Scmiccs l)ircclor dctcm~ines to be compatible in the ih'ese~e District. 4.4 DEVEI.,OPMENT STANDARDS A. All structures shall scl back a mininlum of l'ivc fcct (5') from Preserve District boundaries and roads, except for pathways, boardwalks and water management structures which shall have no reqt, ircd setback. B. Lighting facilities shall be arranged in it manner which will protect roadways and residential properties fronl direct glare or tmrcasonablc interference. C. Maximun~ height of structures -Twenty five feet (25'). 4-1 D. Minimum distance between principal strtlCll, ll'l~s - Ten l~et (I0'). E. Minimum distance between accessory structures - Five feet (5'). F. Minimun~ l]oor area- None required. G. Minimun~ Io~ or parcel area - None required. 11. Standards for parking, landsc~ping, signs and ofl~cr land uses whcrc such standards arc not specified herein or within adopted The I)uncs Community Design Guidelines and S~andards. are to be in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of Site Devch)pmcnt Plan Approval. LInlcss ofl~crwise indicated, rcquircd y~rd>~, heights, and floor arc;~ standards apply to principal sn'uclurcs. !. Thc M~rginal Wharf shall be in compli~mcc with thc Manatee Prolcction Plan al thc t~:nc of final devch)pmcnt order :q)proval. 4.5 PRESERVE AREA CONSERVATION EASEMENT A non-exclusive consc~'ation casement or tract is required by Collier Courtly Land Development Code Section 3.2.8.4.7.3 I'or lands included in the Preserve l)islrict. In addition to Collier County. a non-exclusive conservation casement may also be required by other regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over Preserve District lands. In addition to complying with provisions o~' thc Collier County l.and Development Code. said casement shall be provided in accordance with thc temps set lBrth in any applicable permit granted by other ~tgcncics. The Mas~cr Properly Owners' Association shall be responsible ~'or control and maintenance of hinds within the Present District. 4-2 SECTION V (; ENERAI, I)EVEIX)I~'MENT COMMITMENTS PURPOSE The purpose cfi' dlis Section is to set I'orlh Iht development commilmenls for thc development of the project. 5.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with this PUD documcr~t, applicable Final Site Development l'lans, Final Subdivision Plats, and all applicable State and local laws. codes, and regulations applicable to Ihis I'UI). t~xccpt where spccil'ically noted or slated otherwise, the sl:mdards and specifications of thc Land Development Code. Division 3.2 shall apply to this project ev,vu il' the land within the PUl) is not to be plmtcd. '['he l)cvcl~pcr, its successor and assigns, shall be ,'csponsiblc l~r the commilmcnls outlined in this d{)cumc~lt. 5.3 PUl) MASTER i'I~AN A. Exhibi! "A". the PUl) Master Plan. illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed Iracl. lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries, shall not be construed m be specific and may be modified during the platting or site development plan approval process. Subject Io thc provisions of Section 2.7.3.5 of the Land Development Code. PUl) amendments may be made l?onl time to tinlc. B. All ncccssm'y casements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted lo insure thc continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. C. Thc l~llowing shall be considered minor changes and refinements. I. Rcc(mfiguralion of preserve areas, jurisdictional wetland limits, and mit;gm;on l'caturcs as a result of regulatory agency review. 2. Rcconfigurati{m of lukcs, ponds, cunals, or other water management facilities where such chungcs arc consistent with tl~c crilcria of thc Soulh Florida Water Management District and Collier County and where there is no further cncroachmcni into preserve areas. 3. Internal realignment (ff rights-of-way other than a relocation of access points to thc I'[;1). 4. Rcconfiguration of rcsidcnlial parcels when there is m) encroachment into preserve areas. 5-1 5,4 SCllEI)UI,E O1,' I)EVI,:I,Oi~MENT/MONIT()RIN(; REP()RT ANi) SUNNET PROVISION A. Iniliati(m oi' c()n.strucli()n on Thc I)uncs pr(~.jccl is cxpcclcd t() occur in calendar year 199S. Markcling of residential ~hcs will tx'gan in calendar year IU97. ('onstruction is expected lo bc COllCJtltJcd Jav llot later than calendar ~c:lr 2I~)S. B. Monitoring Report: ,.\n :mnual monit,~rin~: rcpor~ ,,hall tx- submitted pursuant lo Section 2.7.3.6 of the ('oilier ('OtllllV I.;Imt I)cvch~pmcm (',~lc. $.5 I'OI,I,IN(; I'I,ACI.:S l'ursu;mt to ScclHm 2.t'~.3(} ;H thc I.:md I)cvclopmcnl ('t~lc. provision shull tx' made for lhc l'tHurc u~c of space xvitllin a comnl(m buildin~ for Ibc purpose ,q acc(mmHMaling thc funclh}n o[' all elcclora[ polling place. An a~r¢cmcnl ,,hull bc rcc(mlcd in thc (H'l'iciHI rcoml, ,U' thc ('lcrk ()f thc ('ircuil ('()ut't ,U' ('~,ilicr ('ounly. which shall Ix' Ifindmg up()n :my and all ~ucccssors in interest that :lcquirc owncrqHp ,f such COIl1111()11 ;ireils including, but nol limited H). c(md(mliniunl axstk'i;lljtms, ht)rllcowncr ;IN~tk'lilJ~On~. (}r commtlllilV FCCl'C;lliOrl, public building~/pulqic r'()()Hi~ ()r similar c()llllll()n l'acilitic~ to bc used for u polling place if dclcrmincd mbc necessary Iw thc Supervisor of Election~. 5.6 SUIH)IVISION RI':QUIREMi.:N'I'S ANI) S'i'ANI):',,Ri) i)ESI(;N SUIISTITUTI()NS A. Private sll'eel.',; shall conl'ornl with Iht right-of-way width requircnlenls of Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.5 (if the LI)C' excep! as follows: ('ul-dc-sac and hwal streets less dmn (mc Ihous:md feet (I.()()0') ill lenolh= arc required have a minimtlm I'ortv fool (40') right-ol'-way width and two ten fool (I 0') wide travel lanes as required by Subscclion 3.2.8.4.16.5. All olhcr cul-de-sacs are requh'ed Io have a mininlunl of forty fool (40') right-of-way widlh m~d lu,,o ten fool (I ()') wide Iravel lanes ii.,; required by Subsecli(m 3.2.8.4.16..~. All odler local slreet.,¢ tire required to have ii minirnum forty feet (40') right-of-way and Iw() len fo(il (I ()') wide Ir'avel lanes :JS required by Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.5. Cul-de-sacs may exceed a Icnglh of fifteen hundred feet (15()0') as required by subsection 3.2.8.4.16.6. 'Fanucnts betwccn reverse curves shall not be required under Subseclion ':; '~ 8 4 ~ . ..... 16.10. Slrecl gracl¢.,~ may exceed four pcrccn~ (4%) under Subscclion 3.2.8.4.16.14 provided thai applicable Florida I)cpartmcnl ol'Trm~spoz'talion. Manual of Uniform Minimum StandaFds (FI)OT MUMS) ;lnd AASI ITO criteria are met. 5-2 o 5.7 TRANSi'()RTATI()N Thc dcvclopmcnt el' Ihis PI JI) M;tslcr I'hm shall be sub. jcct to and governed by Iht I'ollmving conditions: A. Work v,'ithin Collier ("OLlllly righl-of-w;Lv m;LV mcct tile requirements of ('oilier Counlv Right-Ol'-W:iy Ordinance No. 93-64. 1½. Both norlhbound and soulhl'~ound turrl hines m;ly be required on Van(tcrbJil i)rive. Turn lanes shall bc in pkJcC and :~vmh~l)lc for all phases of thc project including initial conslruclion, sales CCnlCF ()per~tmn ~m~l final occupancy. C. Both castl)~mnd and Wcslbound lurn lanes may bc ultimatc}y required on Blucbill Avenue thc proposed secondary entrance. Turn lanes shiiII bc in accordance wilh Collier Cotll~tv Righl-~ff-Wny Ordin~mcc ~O3-386. A drivcw~y COlmccliim with 50 Foot radius i'clurns qhall be sul'l'icicnl For thc opening o1' a sales facility prior lo thc turn lane warranls. Access on ltlucbill Avenue shall be co{~rdimllcd wid~ Iht proposed counly park. Thc Bluebill Avenue access muv be developed as ~ shared .joim access with thc counly pi~rk. Thc Blucbill Avenue access shall b~ a sccomlary ~cccss For Thc I)unc~ itnd may bc eliminaled at Ibc Developer's rcquesl subject to appFovld bY Ibc county IFimS[)ol'lltli(~ll dc[)',ll'llllclll. ('onslruclion lrnl'l'ic and olhcF truck IrnI'l'ic shall not lac pcnnillcd d~rough Iht I~lucbill Avenue access. A sldcs l'ilcililv ~md entrance m~w ~ operated by thc I)cvcl(~pcr using Ibc sccondm'y cnlnmcc. Guests. deliveries, nnd all truck Iral'l]c shall usc Iht nlnin access on Vandcrbilt Drive. A properly funclioning card entry gale is an itcccptablc inclms o1' csh~blishing thc Blucbill Avenue access as a sccond~ry cntnmcc. I). The applicant shall bc responsible For Ihe inslalh,lion of street lighting at all project enln, nccs ~,t tile time of' construction. E. Substantial competent evidence sh:dl bc provided by the developer to thc cl'l~ct that the project is designed to pr(wide capacity and IFealmCllt For historical roatlxvay runolT. In addition, silo dl'ailmgc shall m~l be pcrmillcd lo dischm'~c directly in any roadway drainage system. F. All rCtlUircd improvements, excluding right-of-way donalions I'or roadway segments spccil'ically mcnlioncd in thc Counlv's Five-Ten Year Work Plan. shall be considered "silo related" as dcl'incd in Ordinance 92-22. as amended. Ibc Collier County Road Imp~ct Fcc Ordinance. and shall nol bc eligible For credit Ioward a~ly FOad impact l~cs rcquh'cd by that ontinancc. This slJpulillion spccil'ically roi'ers to silc-rclalcd lure hines mentioned in Items C and I) above. G. Thc applicanl shall c{)ntl'ibulc ;t f'air share toward thc cost o1' tr'alTic si.snals at any pro. joel CnIFilnCC or at lilt inlcrseclion of Vai'ldel'l~Jll i)rive and I I l lh Street. il' and when dccmcd warraFiIcd by Il'lc COLIiIlV. Such Ii';il'l'ic si.gn~ils shall be owned, operated and nlainlaincd by the CotllllV. H. Compcnsaling ri.ght-of-way for lurn lanes and median areas shall be dcdicalctl by tile applicant to reimburse the County For tile use of existing right-ol'-wt,y following the preterit, re authorized by Section 2.2.20.3.7 oI' thc Collier Cot, nlv Land Development Code. Such dcdicalion shall be considcFcd site i'clatcd and there shall be no road impact l'cc credil lo tile applicant. 5-3 I. Developer shall be responsible for the constrt, ction of a minimum 5 foot wide (minimum 6 fool wide along back of curb over bridge) concrete sidewalk along the north side of Bluebill venue frontage ~md up to and tying into the sidewalk at l)clnor Wiggins Park to tile west and Vanderbilt Drive to tile cast. Thc sidew~,lk shall be coordinated wJlh Ibc proposed county park relative to grade and location. Sidewalk improvements over the bridge may require ;~ddilional bridge widening to accommodate travel lanes, bike lanes, curb & gutter, sidewalks and safety barriers. Such improvements are considered site rclalcd and there shall be no road imllaCl I'cc credit Io tl~c applicant. Thc Developer may satisfy this requirement by contributing the necessary funds Io Collier County. 5.8 WATER MANAGEMENT The development of this PUl) Master F'lan shall bc sub. jeer to and governed by thc following conditions: A. A copy of the S[:WMI) Surface Water I'crmit or Early Work Permit with staff report is required prior lo final construction plan approval. B. An Excavation Permit will be required for the proposed lakes in ~,ccordance with Division 3.5 ()ir' the LI)C and S[-Wv'MI) rules. 5.9 UTILITIES Thc dcvclopmcnt of this PUD Master Plan shall be subject to and governed by thc following conditions: A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission lines to serve tile project arc to designed, constructed, conveyed, and/or owned and maintained in accordance wilh Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17. as amended, and other applicable County niles and regulations. B. All customers c(mnccling to the water dislribution and sewage collection facilities to be constructed will be ct~stomcrs of tile County and will be billed by tile County in accordance with tile County's established rates. C. Thc on-sile water distribution system serving Ihe project musl be connected to the Dislrict's water main and must be consistent with Iht main sizing requirements specified in the County's W~ucr Masler Plan and extended throughout Ibc project. During design of these l'acilitics, tile following features shall be incorporated into thc dislribulion system: I. l)cad-cnd mains shall include dead-end flushing hydrants. 2. Stubs for future system intcrconncction with adjacen! properties slmll bc provided to thc property lines of tile project at locations to be muttlally agreed to by tile County and Ibc l)cvclopcr during the design phase of thc project. D. Tile utility constrt~ction documents for tile project's sewerage system si'mil bc prepared so that all sewage flowing to tile Cotmty's master pump station is transmitted by one (1) main on-site pump station, l)uc to thc design and configuration of thc master pump station, flow by gravity init) the 5-4 1213 6 station will not be possible. Thc l)cvclopcr's engineer si'mil meet with tile County staff prior commencing preparation of construction drawings so ti'mt all aspects of the sewerage system design can be coordinated with file County's Sewer Master F'hm. E. Thc existing off-site water facilities of Iht I)islrict must bc evaluated for hydraulic capacity serve this project and reinforced as required, if necessary, consistent with thc County's Water Master l'hm lo insure Ih;il thc I)istrict's water svslcm can hydraulically provide a sul'l~cicnl quanlily of walcr 1o mccI Ibc anlicipalcd dcman(Is of Ibc project and Ibc I)islricl's existing F. Thc existing ()l'l'-silc sewage tr;insn~ission facilities of tile District must be evaluated for thc hydr;tulic c;q)acily I<~ serve lhix projccl and improved as required outs;dc thc l)ro.jcct':; r,-undarv lo provide adequate capacity lo ll'ansporl thc additional waslcwatcr gcncrmcd wilhout adverse impact lo thc existing Ir;mxmisxion I'acililicx. 5,10 ENVIRONMI';N'i'AI~ The development of this I'UI) Master l'lan shall bc subject to and governed by tile following conditions: A. Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with thc Slate of Florida Environmcmal Resource I'crmit Rules and be subject to review and approval by Cu~cnt Planning Environmental Review Staff. Removal of exotic vegetation shall not be thc sole mitigaliort for impacts to Collier County .jurisdictional wetlands. B. All conscrvalion areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation tracts or casements on all conslruclion plans and shall be recorded on lhe plat with protective covenants pct' or similar to Stol;on 704.06 of tile Florida Slatules. Buffers and setbacks shall be in accordance with 3.2.8.4.7.3 of the Collier County [,and Development Code. C. Buffers around preserved .jurisdictional wetlands shall be in accordance with tile State of Florida Environmental Resource l~crmit Rules. Preserved .jurisdictional wetl;mds and summnding buffers shall be incorporated in C(mscr,.';ltion Areas which shall be platted. l). An exotic vegetation relnoval, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic-free) plan for thc site. with cnlplmsis <m thc conservalioWprcscrvations areas, shall be submitted to Current Phmning Environmental Review Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. E. Tile I)cvclopcr shall comply with the guidelines ;md rccommcn¢lalions of lhe Florida Game and Fresh Witter Fish Corm'nission (FGFWI:(') regarding impacts to protected wildlife species. F. In Iht event tile pro.joel does not require plaiting. ;ill conscp,,ation areas shall be recorded its clmscrvation/prcscrvation tracts or easements dedicated to ;.in approved entity or to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance and subject to thc uses and limitations similar to or ax per Florida Statutes Section 704.06. 5-5 - 12B 6 O. A gopher torloise survey and relocation / nlanagcmcnt plan shall be submiltcd to Curt'CDt Planning Environnmnt~d Staff for review and approval prior to final silc plan/construction plan approval. A copy of the rclocation,'managcmcnl plan shall be included on the final silo plans/construction plans. 5.11 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Accessory structures shall bc conslr'uclcd simultaneously with or folloxving thc construction of thc principal structure except thai temporary sales buiklings, trailers, marketing facilities, contructors' storage ~,nd office £acilitios and thc like, may bc erected ~,nd utili×¢d during the period of project developnmnt and marketing. Such Icmpontry buildin/2s shall be removed upon complclior~ of thc marketing or construction activity which they arc accessory to. 5.12 SIGNS All signs shall comply with Division 2.5 of thc l.and l)cvclopment Code in el'feet at thc time of building permit application. 5.13 I.ANDSCAPIN(; FOR OFF-STRI';ET PARKIN(; AREAS All landscaping For off-street parking areas shull be in accordance with tile Division 2.4 of tile Land Development Code in cffecl ut tile tirne of building peFmit application. 5.14 PROVISION FOR ()FF-SITE REMOVAl, ¢)F EARTilEN MATERIAl, Thc excavation of earthen material and its stockpiling in preparation of water nmnagemenl facilities or to otherwise develop water bodies is hcrcby permitted. If it is demonstrated that fill activities on those buildable portions of tile project silt arc such that there is a surplus of earthen material, then its off-site disposal is also hereby permitted subject to the folloxving conditions: I. Exc;tvation activities shall comply with tile definition of a "development excavalioW' pursuant to l)ivision 3.5 of tile Land l)cvclopmcnt Code whereby off-site removal shall be limited to ten percent (to a maximum of 20.000 cubic yards) of tile total volume excavated unless a commercial excaV;.ltion permit is received. 2. All other provisions of said l)ivision 3.5 arc applicable. 5-6 12B 6 The DUNES PUD Master Plan EXHII31T "A" [ -n,.[[ ' ' ,,In. ............................................... I [ [ iii ........ llli 6 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify tha~'c the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 98-24 Which was adopted by the Board of County Conunissioners on the 24th day of March, 1998, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 27th day of March, 1998. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and .Clerk Ex-officio to Boar~.of County Commissioners By: Ellie Hof fman Deputy Clerk ":.. .. 12B 6 .,~,!AXIMUM I,AND USE INTENSITY SUMMARY USE MAX. D.U.'s ACRES Residential 531 85.55 2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN API'ROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. Prior to tile recording of a Record Plat. and/or Condominium Plat all or part of thc PUD. final plans for all required improvements shall receive approval of the appropriate Collier County governmental agencies to insure compliance with the PUD Master Plan, tile Collier County Land Development Code, and thc platting laws of thc State of Florida, if applicable. B. Exhibit "A", the PUD Master Plan, constitutes thc required PUD Development Plan. Subsequent to or concurrent with PUD approval, a Preliminary Subdivision Plat, if applicable, shall be submitted for the entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan or alternatively for portions or phases of it mg developed. Any division of hind and the development of the land shall be in compliance with Division 3.2 ot' the Collier County Land Development Code, and the platting laws of the State of Florida. C. The provisions of Division 3.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts or parcels of land as provided in said Division prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. D. The development of any tract or parcel approved for residential development contemplating fee simple ownership of land for each dwelling unit shall be required to submit and receive approval of a Preliminary Subdivision Plat in conformance with requirements of Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code prior to the submittal of construction plans and a Final Subdivision Plat for any such portion of the tract or parcel. E. Utility, road, public, private, casements shall be established ;ks required during the SDP and/or plat approval process. F. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructure improvements regarding dedications and the method for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. 2.5 MODEL HOMES/SALES OFFICES Model home, sales centers and other uses and structures related to the promotion and sale of real estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions, viewing platforms, gazebos, parking areas, tents, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses throughout The Dunes Community subject to the requirements of Section 2.6.33.4 of the Collier County Land Development code. I II 128 6 2.6 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PI, AN Amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance as provided in the Collier County [.and Development Code, Section 2.7.3.5. 2,7 ASSOCIATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS FOR COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Common area maintenance will be provided by a Master Property Owners' Association to be created by the developer. The property owners' association shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance, and management of the surface water and stormwater management systems, and preserves serving The Dunes Community, in accordance with the provisions of this PUD, together with any applicable permits from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and South Florida Water Management District. 2.8 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERM, FENCES AND WALLS Landscape buffers, berms, fences, and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout The Dunes Community. The following standards can be altered at the time of site plan approval by the Development Service Director: A. Landscape berms shall have the following maximum side slopes: I. Grassed berms 4:1 2. Ground covered berms 3:1 3. Rip-Rap berms I: I 4. Structural walled berms - vertical B. Fence or wall maximum height: six feet (6), as measured from the finished grade of the ground at the base of the fence 0r wall. For the purpose of this provision, finished grade shall be considered to be no greater than eighteen inches (I 8") above the highest crown elevation of the nearest existing road unless the fence or wall is constructed on a perimeter landscape berm. In these cases the wall shall not exceed six feet (6') in height from the top of berm elevation for berm elevation with an average side slope of 4:1 or less, and shall not exceed four feet (4') in height from the top of berm elevation for berms with an average side slope of greater than 4:1 (i.e. 3:1). C. Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls may be constructed along thc perimeter of The Dunes Community PUD boundary prior to subdivision plat or site development plan submittal. All such areas must be included in a landscape buffer easement on final plats, or in a separate recorded instrument. 2-3 12B 6 D. The South 25 feet of the property will be available for use by the owners of the Dunes Project and by Collier County under the conditions herein set forth. The area shall serve as a landscape buffer for thc Dunes that will incorporate landscaping to buffer the Project from the adjoining right of way. It may also incorporate a wall or fence meeting county requirements. The area shall also be available for usc by Collier County to incorporate a sidewalk, benches, storm sewers and vehicle tumarounds to be used in conjunction with a planned county park and parking area. This area will be established as such in any plat of the property and a non-exclusive easement shall be provided to Collier County that will restrict and limit public use to usc in conjunction with thc proposed park ,and parking ~u'ca as and when developed. Thc Developer shall construct the landscaping and sidewalks within the area. Such improvements arc site related and are not eligible for impact fee credits. All other improvements related to thc proposed park and parking will be constructed by Collier County but may be constructed by the Developer at its election, and at its expense, and subject tc ,pproval from the County Parks Director. If thc Developer elects to and does construct such ether improvements they will be eligible for county park impact fcc credit. All setbacks will be measured from thc south property line and thc foregoing area will be included in the setback. 2.9 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS The establishment of a Planned Unit Development is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control, as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code. Section 2.2.20. I. The Dunes Community is planned as a private, functionally interrelated community under unified control, to be developed over an extended time period. The developer will establish community-wide design guidelines and standards to ensure a high and consistent level of quality for community features and facilities, which include items such as landscaping, h~u'dscape, waterscapes, signage, lighting, pedestrian systems, bicycle l~aths, pavement treatments, roadway medians, fences, walls, buffers, berms and other similar facilities. The Developer will achieve the above objectives by means of recorded covenants, conditions, and restrictions. 2-4 ................................................ III III I .............. iii ........... SECTION III RESIDENTIAl, DEVEI.OPMENT AREAS 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of lhis Section is to cslablish land usc regulations and development standards for the residential development areas indicated on Exhibit "A", the PUD Master Ph.m. 3.2 MAXIMUM DWELI.,ING UNITS The maximum number of dwelling units permitted in the entire PUD is 531. The property contains a gross acreage of 88.55 acres and based on a density of six (6) dwelling units per gross acre. the PUD provides for five hundred and thirty one (531) dwelling units. This action makes the land usc and density consislcnt with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. Distribution of the dwelling units in tile residential areas is not predetermined, lind may occur as authorized via Site Development Plan approval. 3.3 GENERAL I)ESCRIPTION Areas designated "R" on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of residential dwelling types, compatible nonresidential uses, a full range of recreational facilities, essential services, and customary accessory uses. Final tract configuration and actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with Division 3.3 and Division 3.2, respectively, of the Collier County Land Development Code. Residential tracts are designed Io accommodate internal roadways, open spaces, parks and amenity areas, lakes and water management facilities, and other similar uses found in residential areas. 3.4 USES PERMITTEI) " A. Principal [)'scs 1. Multi-filmily dwellings including garden apartments. 2. Single-family attached/detached and townhouse dwellings. 3. Public parking lot. B. Accessory Uses 1. Uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted. 2. Private boathouses and docks, subject to Sec. 2.6.21 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 3-1 12B 3. Recreational facilities that serve as an integral pm of the residential development and have been designated, reviewed and approved on a site development plan or preliminar), subdivision plat for that development. Recreational facilities may include, but are not limited to clubhouse, community center building and tennis filcilities, parks, playgrounds and playfields. ' - ' ' 4. Recreational facilities and amenities for usc by residents of the residential tracts. 3.5 DEVELOPMEN'r STANDARDS A. Table I sets forth thc development standards for land uses within thc "R" Residential District. B. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein are to tx: in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of Site Development Plan approval. Llnless otherwise indicnted, required yards, heights. and floor area standards apply to principal structures. D. Development standards for uses not specifically set forth in Table I shall be established during the Site Development Plan approval as set forth in Division 3.3 of the Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of the zoning district which is most similar to the proposed use. E. In the case of residential structures with a common architectural theme, required property development regulations may be waived or reduced as provided by the provisions in Article 2. Division 2.6, Section 2.6.27.4.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Ali yards, setbacks, etc. shall be in relation to the individual parcel boundaries, except as otherwise provided for by this document, or except as authorized via the Site Development Plan approval process. 3-2 TIlE DUNES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT SINGLE FAMILY MULTI- IIIGtI-RISE STANDARDS ATTACIlED AND FAMILY M UI,TI-FAM TOWNHOUSE DWELLINGS I DWELLINGS II Parcel R-2 Parcel R-2 Parcels 1-5 Minimum 3,(×)0 SI: N/A N/A Lot Area Minimum Lot Width .s 30 150 N/A Front Yard 20 '~ 25 0.5 BH Front Yard for --- Side Entry Garage IO 15 N/A Side Yard .4 0 or .5 BH .7 0.5 BH 0.5 BH Rear Yard Principal 20 BH BH Rear Yard Accessory I 0 15 15 Rear Yard .t 10 0.5 BH 0.5 BH Maximum BIdg lleight .2 35 45 125' or 12 stories Distance Between Principal Structures 0.5 SBH 0.5 SBH 0.5 SBH Floor Area 1200 SF 1000 SF 1200 SF Min. (S.F.) Bit: Building lleight SBH:lSum of Building Iieight): Cmnbined height 4ff tw~ adjaccm buildings for the purTx~scs of determining setback requirements. All distances are in feet ~mlcss othcr~,isc noted. ° I - Rear yards fi~r principal :md access,fy structures ~m lots and tracts which abut a lake. m~n jurisdictional OlX-n space or native vegetation preservation areas may be zero (0') feet except that ,~hen aixntmg a lake {~r water Ix,dy an architectural bank treatmenl shall be incorlx~rated into the design. Finn! yards shall be mca'tared xs fi,ll,,ws A. If the parcel is served by a pubhc ngh . fi-way setback is measured from thc adjacent right-of, way line. B. If the parcel is served b.,, a pn'.:,te road. setback is mc.x~ured from the back ~ff curb (if curbed) or edge tff pavemcm (if not curbed}. '2 - Buildings shall nol e~ceed :~ height ,f ,ne hundred and ~wcn~y.live (I 25) fcc~ aIx~vc .*-.lean Fl~d Elcvaticm established by law as illustrated ~n the Master Plan. *3 · Single-family attached dwellings ,~.hich provide f,r 2 parking spaces within an enclosed g~.:age and pr.vide fin guest parking other than in private dri'.c~.'avs mav reduce the front yard requirement to 5' fl,r thc garage and 15' fi~r the remaining structures. '4 · Zero feet (0') or a minimum ~f five feet (Sb on either side except that where thc zero feet {0'l yard option is utilized, the opposite side of the structure shall have a ten foot (103 yard. Zero feet (0') yards may be used <,n Ix~th sides ,ifa structure provided that ntt structure on any adjoining lot lies within ten 110t feet of a zero (0) lot structure. *5 - Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% fl~r cul-de-sac lc, ts provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. '6 - Zero feet (0') fi~*t provision d,cs not apply to any exterior wall ora structure and is intended m apply to the common wall or wall ahmg interior lot lines within a series of town~use or semi-detached units. *7 - Access~ny uses such as any authorized recreati~mal amenity (i.e. p~xfls, spas. landscape features, etc.) may be h.~ated within zero (0) feet ora side lot line wh.'n adjacent the wall of a residence with no '~,indow 3-3 12B SECTION IV PRESERVE DISTRICT 4.1 PURPOSE Thc purpose of this Scction is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within The Dunes Community designated on thc Master Plan as Preserve District. 4.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Preserve on the Master l'lan arc designed to accommodate a full range of conservation and limited water management uses and functions. The primary purpose of the Preserve District is to retain viable naturally functioning wetland and xeric upland systems, to allow restoration and enhancement of impacted or degraded wetland systems, and to provide an open space amenity for the cnjoyment of Thc Dunes Community residents. 4.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures I. Passive recreational areas, boardwalks, including recreational shelters and restrooms. 2. Biking, hiking, nature and equestrian trails (excluding asphalt paved trails in wetlands). 3. Water management facilities, structures and lakes, including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural treatments. 4. Any other conservation and related open space activity or usc which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible in the Preserve District. 4,4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. All structures shall set back a minimum of five feet (5') from Preserve District boundaries and roads, except for pathways, boardwalks and water management structures which shall have no required setback. B. Lighting facilities shall be arranged in a manner which will protect roadways and residential properties from direct glare or unreasonable interference. C. Maximum height of structures - Twenty five feet (25'). 4-.1 5.7 TRANSPORTATION The development of this PUD Master Plan shall bc subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Work within Collier County right-of-way may meet the requirements of Collier County' Right-Of-Way Ordinance No. 93-64. B. Both northbound anti southbound turn lanes may be required on Vanderbilt Drive. Turn lanes shall be in place and available for all phases of the project including initial construction, sales center oPeration and final occupancy. C. Both eastbound and westbound rum lanes may be ultimately required on Bluebill Avenue the proposed secondary entrance. Turn lanes shall be in accordance with Collier County Right-of-Way Ordinance//93-386. A driveway connection with 50 foot radius return.~ ?;hall be sufficient for the opening of a sales facility prior to the turn lane warrants. Access on Blucbill Avenue shall be coordinated with the proposed county park. The Bluebill Avenue access may be developed as a shared joint access with tile county park. Thc Blucbill Avenue access shall be a secondary access for Thc Dunes and may be eliminated at the Developer's request subject to approval by thc county transportation department. Construction traffic and other truck traffic shall not be pcrnfitted through the Blucbill Avenue access. A sales fi~cility and entr;mce may be operated by the Developer using the secondary entrance. Guests, deliveries, and all truck traffic shall use the main access on Vanderbilt Drive. A properly functioning card entry gate is an acceptable means of establishing the Bluebill Avenue access as a secondary entrance. D. The applicant shall be responsible for thc installation of street lighting at all project entrances at the time of construction. E. Substantial competent evidence shall be provided by the developer to the effect that the project is designed to provide capacity and treatment for historical roadway runoff. In addition, site drainage shall not be'permitted to discharge directly in any roadway drainage system. F. All required improvements, excluding right-of-way donations for roadway segments specifically mentioned in the County's Five-Ten Year Work Plan, shall be considered "site related" as defined in Ordinance 92-22, as amended, the Collier County Road Impact Fee Ordinance, and shall not be eligible l'or credit toward any road impact fees required by that ordinance. This stipulation specifically refers to site-related turn lanes mentioned in hems C and D above. G. The applicant shall contribute a fair share toward tile cost of traffic signals at any project entrance or at the intersection of Vanderbilt Drive and 111 th Street, if and when deemed warranted by thc Count,,,,. Such traffic signals shall be owned, operated and maintained by the County. H. Compensating right-of-way for turn lanes and median areas shall be dedicated by the applicant to reimburse the County for the usc of existing right-of-way following the procedure authorized by Section 2.2.20.3.7 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Such dedication shall be considered site related and there shall be no road impact fee credit to the applicant. 5-3 I. Developer shall be responsible for the construction of a minimum 5 foot wide (minimum 6 foot wide along back of curb over bridge) concrete sidewalk along the north side of Blucbill venue frontage and up to and tying into the sidewalk at Delnor Wiggins Park to the west and Vandcrbih Drive to the cast. The sidewalk shall be coordinated with the proposed county park relative to grade and location. Sidewalk improvements over the bridge may require additional bridge widening to accommodate travel lanes, bike lanes, curb & gutter, sidewalks and safety barriers. Such improvements are considered site related and there shall be no road impact fee credit to thc applicant. The Developer may satisfy this requirement by contributing the necessary funds to Collier County. 5.8 WATER MANAGEMENT The development of this PUD Master Plan shall bc subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. A copy of the SFWMD Surface Water l'crmit or Early Work Permit with staff report is required prior to final construction plan approval. B. An Excavation Permit will be required for thc proposed lakes in accordance with Diviqion 3.5 of the LDC and SFWMD rules. 5.9 UTILITIES The development of this PUD Master Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission lines to serve the project arc to be designed, constructed, conveyed, and/or owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 97-17, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. B. All customers connecting to thc water distribution and sewage collection facilities to be constructed will be customers of the County and will be billed by the County in accordance with the County's established rates. C. The on-site water distribution system scrving thc project must be connected to the District's water main and must be consistent with thc main sizing requirements specified in the County's Water Master Plan and extended throughout the project. During design of these facilities, the following features shall be incorporated into thc distribution system: I. Dead-end mains shall include dead-end flushing hydrants. 2. Stubs for future system interconnection with adjacent properties shall be provided to the property lines of the project at locations to be mutually agreed to by the County and the Developer during the design phase of the project. D. The utility construction documents for the project's sewerage system shall be prepared so that all sewage flowing to the County's master pump station is transmitted by one ( ! ) main on-site pump station. Due to the design and configuration of the master pump station, flow by gravity into the 5-4 COI.L .RCOt N'rvn. O ,DA 1 2 REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IlEA~NGS To: Clerk to the ~ard: Please place the following as a: X No,al legal Adve~:~mcnt ~ Other: (Display Adv., l~atio~ etc.) ~g~fing D~ Div: T~ns~tio~blic Works Person: Marqui~ K~g 0 ~ ~ Date: 12/12/97 Petition No. (If none, give brief de<fiption): N/A Petitioner: ~e & Address): N/A Name ~ Ad&ess of ~y ~rson(s) to be notified by Clerk's O~ce: (If more s~ce is needed, aRach separate sheet) .~' Hearing ~fore X Bce B~ Other Requesled Heating ~le: (Based on advertisement appeadn~ays ~fore hearing. Newspa~s) to ~ used: (Complete only if impoflant): X Naples Daily News ~ Other X Legally Required ~oposed %xt: (Include legal description & common location & S~e: An ~din~ce amending Collier Coun~ Ordinance No. 72. I, ~ amended, which gealed ~e Collier County Lighting Dis~ict by deleting Foxfire Uni~ I & 3 from die Collier Coun~ Lighting DisMct; providing for inclusion in C~e of Laws and Ordinances; providing conflict and sevembili~; and providing an effective ~te. Companion ~tition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Vacation Petition AV 97-028 Does Petition Fee include adveflising cost? ~ Yes X No If Yes, what accost should ~ charged for adve~ising cos~: 101- 163610-~91~ Reviewed by: Approved by: Date Coun~ Manager Date List A~chmenu: Executive SusaW and Ordinance DIST~B~ION ~STRUC~ONS A. For hearings bebre Bce or BZA: Iniliating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting Io County Manager. Nole: If legal documenl is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or requ~t for same, is submitted to County Altorney before submilting lo County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute eopi~: X County Manager agenda file: to X Requesting Division X Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a cop)' for file. FOR CLERK'S OFHCE USE ONLY: Date Received: ~-/".~ r.,/.~-~-Date of Public hearing:_,_,_,_,~_d/:~.,5/,//~,~ Date Advertised: lllliilillllillllllllllliliillllllllllllllllllllillllillllillll TO: I~LS. JUDIT}! FT.ANAfZ. AN LOCATION: NAPLES DALLY NEWS PAX NO.: 263-4864 !ii1111111111111111111111111111111111111111'!!!11111111111111111 FROM: ELLIE tlOFFHAN - t'llNUTES & RECORDS LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX ~10: (813) 774-8408 PHONE ' NO: (8 13) 774 -,q406 02-27j 15: 1! 0_fl'08'43 i~,a76958508 OK 1 ~ . _ 03-02 J 11: 50 80~ 02' 02 92634~4 OK ~~ i 6 ~ 6~ J O3-O2J 12:28 08~81'54 92634864 OK ~~13 ato nent: ~/>/)~ ime ~ent: /~,..~.//.~/. J I . February 24, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider an Amenclment to Ordinance 72-1 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Friday, March 13, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, ir] duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, · Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order ~800835 February 24, 1998 Mr. Ted Beisler Fo×fire Co~nunity Association, Inc. 1030 Kings Way Naples, FL 34103 Re: Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Amending Collier County Ordinance 72-1 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Friday, r~arch 13, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on g~3ESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 72-1, AS AMENDED, WHICH CREATED THE COLLIER COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT BY DELETING FOXFIRE UNITS 1 & 3 FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDIi~G AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 12C S. ()RI)INAN{'I.~ NfL AN ()I~,[)IN,,\N( '1! AMI!NI)IN(; ('{)I I.II!R ('()l ~NT'F ORF)INAN¢'I! N('). 72-1, A~ AMENI)I~I), WIIICII ('REA'['I~[~ 'I'lll~ ('(H.I.IER ~'~)1 IN'FY 1.1(;11'1 IN(; I)I~TRI('T I~' I)I~I.E'I'IN(; F()XFII(I,~ t~NII~ I & 3 I.R()M 'l'lll~ ('()1 I.II:R COUNTV I.I{ ;l I'I'IN(; I)ISI RI("I'; I'ROVII)ING F()R [NCI.IISION IN ('()1)1: f)[, I.AWN ANI) ()RI)INAN('I~S; PROVII)ING ('()NI,II("I ANI) NI~VI~RAIIII,ITY; ANI) PR()VII}IN(; AN I:FFt~("I IVI., I)A'I I,.. Ntl~k'. 'I'tlI~RI.21:()I(I~, I~1~ IT (}I(I)AINt~[) I~h' '1'111~ COMMISSIONERS OF ('r )I.I.I ER ('()1 'N'I'Y, FI.ORIDA SECTIONt)NI,7: AX11,TNI)XII~NTNT()('rHi II,~R('t)IYN'IV()RI)iNAN('i~N(~ '2.1,..X~ NUClh~ll ()lie isl' ('olhcr ('l~lllllV {)rl]lll;llll't. N~) 72 I, ;is amcmlcd, dclcling Iht Ikdlowhlg arc;i I'nml Iht ('oilier ( 'mllllV I.ighlmg I)Jslricl: SIX"I'ION TWO: IN'('l.I ;SI()N IN TI I1{ ('(~I)E ()1: IAWS ANI) ()RI)INAN( 'I.:S 'Hie provisions m' l]lis ()rtJill;incc shall hccimlc /lilt] bc iii;kit ;i ]);Irl ()rtJin;inccs of ('oilier ('ounly, ]:[oritht. Thc scot,oHs ol Ibc {)rdHlimcc ro-lcllcrcd lo ;ICCt~Ill[~JiNJl Silt'J1. ;lll(J JJlc WOl'tJ "ort[Jtl;lllCC" tit',iv bc CJlilllgCtJ ally Olhcr ;tppropri;llc word. SI~CTIONTIIREI{: ('()NFI.I('TANI)NI.]V[.]R:XIiii.iTS' applicable ]aw, thc mom restrictive shMI ;q~ply. I1' ally phr;isc or portion of thc ()rdi.;mcc is hcht illvalid or IIIICOllfililllliolKi[ hy allV LIiiiII'I ol' COlllpClClll Itll'iStJiL'li(lll, tllOh [l(ll'lillli shall hc soparat~, diSlJllCl alld illdCp~n(lonl prnvi~ion and ~llch I1:~kli11~ shall nol romainin~ porliml. fil]C'I'ION FOI.IR: ILFFI{('TIVIL IX.VI'IL This Ordinanc~ shall laku ~l'lgCl ilpOll t]lin~ ~vllJl Iht SvcrL'I;iI'}, I Wnrds Ili'l~.]vfJJll~,'d ;irc ;,hlvd; ~or,ls ~,ltuck Ihi,*u.~h afc dch.'lcd 1 PASSEl) AND I)IH.Y AI')¢)IWI'.'I) by thc Ihx~rd o1' ('ounly Comnfisshmm's Iff COunt)', Florid:l. tiffs ............. day of. ............. , Approved ~,s Io fc~rm and legal sufllcicnc:': \V,~rdn Illldvthllvd .nc ~ cd x','~mls :,I~uck-lhnm~l ;Irc ]2C I I ORDINANCE NO. 98- 2 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COI.LIER COLINTY 4 ORDINANCE NO. 72-1, AS AMENDED, WHICIt CREATED 5 TIlE COLLIER COUNTY LIGIITING DISTRICT BY 6 DEI.ETING FOXFIRE UNITS 1 & 3 FROM TIlE COLLIER 7 COUNTY LIGitTING DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR 8 INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; 9 PROVIDING CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND lO PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Il 12 NOW, TtIEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TilE BOARD OF COUNTY 13 COMMISSIONERS OF COI.LIER COUNTY, FI.ORIDA thai: 14 SECTION ()NE: AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 72-1. AS 15 AMENDED 16 17 Section One of' Collier County Ordinance No. 72-1, as amended, is hereby amended hy 18 dclcling Iht following area from tile Collier County Lighting District: 19 F'O'~~6~s moro pm'~HaHy der. crH~J a~ 21 C~[Jier Cmmty, ~-; ' ~ t .... 22 ~ge~..~ ,.~0.,:--' O~l;~.~.,.,., r-~,,.,),.~.,,,, .c~-:-i~.~. ,~-, ~n~a~ng ~ ~ ~ acre: more ~- ~-' AND 23 24 Al~fire[Jn~ 2 as r~crcoa ~n P~~Pe~O~03; ~us~v:, cf lbo Publ~~f 26 27 SECTION TWO: INCLUSION IN TIlE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES 28 Thc provisions of Ibis Ordinancc shall be:omc ami bc made a pa~ et thc Codc of Laws and 29 Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. Thc sections of Ih: Ordinance may hc rcnumhcrcd or 30 rc-lcllcrcd Io accomplish such. and thc word "ordhmncc" may bc changed Io "sc:lion", "reticle". or 31 any olhcr approprialc word. 32 SECTIONTIIREE: CONFLICT ANDSEVERABILITY 33 In thc event this Ordinance conflicls whh any olhcr Ordinancc of Collier Counly or olhcr 34 applicable law, Ih: more restrictive shall apply. IF any vhrasc or portion of thc Ordinance is held 35 invalid or nnconstitutional by any cou~ of comp:tent jurisdiclion, such portion shall bc deemed a 36 separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect thc validity o~ 37 rcmaining po~ion. 38 SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE 39 This Ordinance shall takc cfi:ct upon filing with Ih: Sccrcta~ of State. 12g 1 I PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by Ih¢ Board of County Commissioncrs of Collicr 2 County, Florida, this day of , 1998. 4 5 ATI'EST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 6 DWIGtlT E. BROCK, Clerk COI.LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 7 8 BY: 9 BARBARA B. BERRY ,Chaim~an I0 II 12 Approved as to I'orm and legal 13 sufficiency: 14 15 IIEIDI F. ASltTON/mk 16 tlcidi F. Ashlon 17 Assistant County Altomcy 18 19 20 2 [ mk/I ZI 2OT/Ord F.xfire S! 1.81An'~nd doc 22 23 Haples, FL 339/.0 Affidavit of Publication NapLes Daily News + 0110 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER BOARD OF COUNTY COtIHISSIONERS ORDINAl'iCE A?TN: NANCY SALOGUB Notice I$ herel3¥ given ?hot on TUESDAY. PO BOX Z, 13016 N~ARCH 24, 199111, In Foe NAPLES FL 3/,101-3016 Boordroom, 3rd Floor, mlnlstroflor~ Building, Co~- Ilar Co~rffy C.,overnrner~ Center, 3301 ~:o$! Tornio. mi Troll, No, les, F:lo~lOo, the Boord of County missioners will Coun~ REFERENCE: 001230 800551 the enoctment of ameeftr~ Ordlnonce. The 57656.~95 HOT[CE OF INTENT TO will commence A.NK. The flft~ of of ~ I}roPosed O~d!nor~ce is os State of Florida County of Collier AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER Defore the undersigned authority, personalty COUNTY O~DINANCE 72.1. AS A/V~ENDEO, appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves WHICH CREATED THI~ as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples COLLIER COUNTY Daily Hews, a rf~ily newspaoer published at Naples, LIGHTING DISTRICT · BY DELETING FOX. in Collier County, Florida: that the attached FIREUNITSI&3FROM copy of advertising was published in said THE COLLIER COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT; newspaper on dates listed. PROVIDING FOR Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily CLUSION IN CODE O~ LAWS AND ORDI- News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said NANCES; PROVIDING CONFLICT AND SEVE- Col.!.ier County, Florida, and that the said RABILITY' AN[:) PRO- newspaper has heretofore been continuously VIDING A~ EFFECTIV~ DATE. published in said Collier County, Florida, each Copies of the p~oOosed day and has been entered as second class mail Ordlnc)rx:e are on file wit~ the Cles~ to tt~t Boord oncl matter at the post office in Naples, in said are crvollo~e for In,Aoec- Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year fiDO. All irfferested ore Invlfed to attend and next preceding the first publication of the beheord. attached copy of advertisement; and affiant Any person wt~3 further says that she has neither paid nor et~etoBoord~°l~v~ll° ne,e~l~ima re- of promised any person, firm or coporation any co~d of the discount, rebate, commission or refund for the pertarnlng thereto or,d fl~eretore choy r~eed fo purpose of securing this advertisement for ensure ~ a vet-botlrn publication in the said newspaper, record cd the peo<:eedln~s Is moore which record clu<~e$ ~he te$~r'no~v ~ PUBLISHED ON: 03/1:~ evidence ~ wt~ich Dot, ccd Is bosod. BOARD OF: COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIR A/LAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, AD SPACE: 69.000 iNCH CLERK BY:./$/EllJe Hoffmon, FILED ON: 0:~/13/98 Del:>uty Clerk Signature of Affiant Suorn to and Subscribed before me this] ,.. day of 19' Personally known by me 1". ~ :7'' ") '~' J' '"'[(" ¼ Collier County, Florida REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ~. 2 C To: Clerk of the Board: Please place the following as a: / X/ Normal Legal Advertisement / [-1/ Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dept/Div: Transpodation/Public Works Person: Russ Mg~r.> Date: February 23, 1998 .......................................................................... .... Petition No. (If none, give brief description): AV 97-028 Petitioner: (Name & address): Fox'fire Community Association, Inc., 1030 Kings Way Naples, FL 34103 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Off'~.e: See List of Adjacent Property Owners (If more space needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before: /X/BCC / /BZA / /Other Requested hearing date: March 24, 1998 Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if impodant /X/, /X/ Naples Daily News or legally required/X/) / / Other Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common locations & size): PETITION AV 97-028 TO RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM ALL RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND PUBLIC TO ACCESS (INGRESS/EGRESS) AND TRAVEL UPON THE FOLLOWING ROADWAYS LOCATED WITHIN FOXFtRE SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; THOSE ROADWAYS DEPICTED AND DESCRIBED IN THE PLAT OF FOXFIRE UNIT ONE, PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 84 THROUGH 86, AND FOXFIRE UNIT THREE, PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 101 THROUGH 103, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING AND UNAFFECTED RIGHTS OF EASEMENT HOLDERS, EMERGENCY MEDICAL AND FIRE SERVICES, COLLIER COUNTY WATER MANAGEMENT VEHICLES AND PERSONNEL, COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION VEH!CLES, PERSONNEL AND PERMITTING, AND COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT VEHICLES AND PERSONNEL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE..THE STREETS PROPOSED TO BE VACATED INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: ESTEY AVE, ,.... FOXFRUSH CT, FOXH'UNT WAY, FOXTR~'~ CT. FOXDDEN C'IRCLE AND FOX~TAIL CT. (COMPANION ITEM TO COUNTY-WIDE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT.) ~ Companion petition(s), if any, & proposed hearing date: March 24, 1998 Does Petition Fee Include Advertising Cost? Yes/X/ No Il-Il If yes, what account should be charges for advertising costs 101-163610-649100 Reviewed b,y~~ Date .,,.~.----,~...w ~ ~' Approved by: Date Division Head Ed Ilschner County Administrator Robed F. Fernandez List Attachments: (1) Resolution (2) Legal Description (3) List of Adjacent Property Owners DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal documents is involved, be sure that any nece. ssary, legal review, or re0uest for same. is submitted to County_ Attorney before submitting to Coun _h, Manager. The Manager's Office will distribute copies: B. /X/ County Manager agenda file; IX/ Requesting Division; IX/ Original to Clerk's Office Other hearings: Initiating Dj.vision Head to approve and submit original lo Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONI,.Y~ Date Received Date Advertised Date of P.H, ,~ ~ ...~. ~ ~ ~ (including this cover) !!1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 LOCATION: NAPLES DAILY NEWS FAX NO.: 263-4864 COM}tENTS : ilililllliillllllllillillllillllillllllllll'llllllllllllllllllll FROM: · ELLIE HOFFMAN - MINUTES & RECORDS. ~._ LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX NO: (813) 774-8408 PHONE 'NO: (813) 77/,-~606 6?0 I 62-241 15:00 00o00'4~ 2610607 ox I 15:09 00°02'45 92613659 OK 068C008000086~ b-6;--;-- ............. 068C008000008 12 2_' February 24, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition AV-97-028 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, March 8, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order #800835 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on March 24, 1998 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition AV-97-028, Kenneth B. Cuyler, as agent for Foxfire Community Association, Inc., requesting that the Board renounce and disclaim all rights and interests of the County and Public to access (ingress/egress) and travel upon the following roadways located within Foxfire Subdivision and Planned Unit Development; those roadways depicted and described in the Plat cf Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, Pages R4 through 86, and Foxfir({ Unit Three, Plat Book 13, Pages 101 through 103, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; providing for the continuing and unaffected rights of easement holders, emergency medical and fire services, Collier County water management vehicles and personnel, Collier County transportation vehicles, personnel and permitting, and Collier County Water-Sewer District vehicles and personnel; providing an effective date. The streets propOsed to be vacated include the following: Road Names: Foxfire Lane, Kings Way and Miscellaneous Circles, Courts, Drives, Ways and Lanes as described below. Location: Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Legal Description: Este¥ Avenue (approximately 180 feet) as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxbrush Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxfire Lane as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxhound Drive as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxhunt Way as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxtrot Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire []nit One Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Kings Way as recorded in the Plats of: Foxfire Unit One Plat Book 13, pages 84 through ~6 and Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, pages 101 through 103; Fox Den Circle as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, pages 101 through 103; Foxtail Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, pages 101 through 103; All as recorded in the Public ~ecords o£ Collier County, Florida. All interested parties are invited to attend, to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board prior to the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) February 24, 1998 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition AV-97-028: Petition by the Foxfire Community Association, Inc., as more fully described on the enclosed Notice of Hearing. Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. Any questions regarding this Petition should be directed to Russ Muller, Engineer, County Transportation Department at: (941) 774-8494. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 2 February 24, 1998 Foxfire Community Association, Inc. 1030 Kings Way Naples, FL 34103 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition AV-97-028 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Co..fy Con ,- 1 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COU.~E~ COUntY COU~r~OUS~ 3301 TAMIAMI ~AIL EASt PO BOX 4130~ CI~CLIIT COU~ NAPLES. ~tO~Da 34~0~-3~ COUN1Y COU~ COUNTY EECO~DEP Dwight E, Brock CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS February 24, 1998 Re: Notice of Public }{earing to Consider Petition AV-97-028: Petition by the Fo×fire Community Association, Inc., as more fully described on the enclosed Notice of Hearing. Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. Any questions regarding this Petition should be directed to Russ Muller, Engineer, County Transportation Department at: (941) 774-8494. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 12C 2 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 330! TAMIAMI TPAIL EAST PO. BOX 413044 C'.~CUIT COU~T NAPLES. FLORIDA 34101-3044 COUNTY COUi2T COUNTY RECORDEt~ Dwight E. Brock CLERK BOAteD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISStONEI~S February 24, 1998 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition AV-97-028: Petition by the Foxfire Community Association, Inc., as more fully described on the enclosed Notice of Hearing. Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. Any questions regarding this Petition should be directed to }{uss Muller, Engineer, County Transportation Department at: (941) 774-8494. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on March 24, ].998 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition AV-97-028, Kenneth 5. Cuyler, as agent for Foxfire Community Association, Inc., requesting that the Board renounce and disclaim all rights and interests of the County and Public to access (ingress/egress) and travel upon the following roadways located within Foxfire Subdivision and Planned Unit Development; those roadways depicted and described in the Plat of Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, Pages 84 through 86, and Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, Pages 101 through 103, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; providing for the continuing and unaffected rights of easement holders, emergency medical and fire services, Collier County water management vehicles and personnel, Collier County transportation vehicles, personnel and permitting, and Collier County Water-Sewer District vehicles and personnel; providing an effective date. The streets proposed to be vacated include the following: Road Names: Foxfire Lane, Kings Way and Miscellaneous Circles, Courts, Drives, Ways and Lanes as described below. Location: Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Legal Description: Estey Avenue (approximately 180 feet) as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxbrush Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxfire Lane as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxhound Drive as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxhunt Way as recorded in the~Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxtrot Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Kings Way as recorded in the Plats of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86 and Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book · · ]2C 2 13, pages 101 through 103; Fox Den Circle as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, pages 101 through 103; Foxtail Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, pages 101 through 103; All as recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All interested parties are invited to attend, to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board prior to the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 12C 2 REQUEST FOR I.EGAL AI)VERTISING OF I'UBLIC IIEARINGS To: Clerk to lhe Board: Please place the following asa: X Normal legal Advertisement ,~ Other: (Display Adv.. lo(alma, etc. Originating Dept./Div: Transportat,on.:Public Works Persm~: Marquita King Petition No. {If none, give brief&:scrlption): N/A Petitioner: {Name & Addressl: N,A Name & Address of any personls} to be notified by. Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheel) .2~,~ 5"',,-'.)') ltearing before X Bt"(' liZ,,\ ¢)ther Requested itearine date: {Based on advertisement apr~carmu 10 days before hcarm,, Newspaperi s/ to be used: {Complete emlv X Naples Daily News ~ Other X Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal des(apt:on ,.~: common location & Size: An Ordinance amending ('oilier County Ordinance No. 72-I. as amended, which created the Collier County Lightm,=, District bv deleting Foxfire Units I & 3 from ;% Collier County Lighting District: providing for lnclusmn in Code of Laws and Ordinances: providing: conflict ami se,.'erabilitv: a:~cl providing an effective date. Companion petmonlsL ifanv & proposed hearing date: Vacation Petition A\" 97-025 Does Petition Fee include adverusing cost'.' V'] Yes N No If Yes. what account should be charged for advertising costs: 101- 163610-649100 Reviewed by: ..\pprovcd by: Division Head Date County Manager Date List Attachments: Execut,vc Summary and Ordinance I)IS'I"RI I:H 'TIO N INSTRI'('TIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one co)' and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to Count)' Manager. Note: If legal document is invoh'ed, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same. is submitted to Count)' Attorney before submitting to County .Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: X Count.,,' Manager agenda file: to X Requesting Division X Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating [)~vzsion head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office. retaining a cop.',' for ill::. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONI.Y: Date Received: Date of Public hearing: Date Advertised: · REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS J~ 2 C To: Ci~.rk ,~f the Board: Please place the following as a: / X~.N..[rmal Legal Advertisement IF-'~ Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dept,'Div: Transportation/Public Works Person: Russ Mutate.. D~e: February 23. 1998 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): AV 97-028 Pe.'itioner: (Name & address): Foxfire Commumty ,~ssoc;at;,on. Inc., 1030 Kings Way Naples, FL 34103 Name & Address of any personfs) to be notified by Clerk's Office: See List of Adjacent Property Owners (if more s3ace needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before: IX/BCC / / BZA / /Other Requested hearing date: March 24, 1998 Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: fComplete only if important IX,'. /X/ Naples Daily News or legally required ;X,') , Other Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common locations & size): PETITION AV 97-028 TO RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM ALL RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND PUBLIC TO ACCESS (INGRESS,'EGRESS) ~.ND "" .7 TRAVEL UPON THE FOLLOWING ROADWAYS LOCATED WITHIN FOXFIRE SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: THOSE ROADWAYS DEPICTED AND DESCRIBED IN THE PLAT OF FOXFIRE UNIT ONE. PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 84 THROUGH 86, AND FOXFIRE UNIT THREE, PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 101 THROUGH 103, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING AND UNAFFECTED RIGHTS OF EASEMENT HOLDERS, EMERGENCY MEDICAL AND FIRE SERVICES, COLLIER COUNTY WATER MANAGEMENT VEHICLES AND PERSONNEL. COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES, PERSONNEL "~ AND PERMITTING, AND COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT VEHICLES AND PERSONNEL: PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE STREETS PROPOSED TO BE VACATED INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:~ESTEY AVE' ' FOXFRUSH CT, FOXHUNT WAY, FOXTROT CT. FOXDDEN CIRCLE AND FOXTAIL CT. (COMPANION ITEM TO COUNTY-WIDE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT.) Cor~pamon petitionfs), if any, & proposed hearing date: March 24, 1998 Does Petition Fee Include Advertising Cost? Yes ,X; No ,':,--_/If yes. what account should be charges for advertising costs 101-163610-649100 Reviewed by: Date Approved by: Date Division Head Ed IIschner County Administrator Robert F. Fernandez List Attachments: (1) Resolution (2) Legal Descnption (3) List of Adjacent Property Owners DISTRIBUT ON INSTRUCTIONS A. Far hearings before BO(;; or B,7.A: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note If leoal d0(;:umentS i~; involved, be s~re that any necessary legal rewew, or request for same. i~; submitted to County Attorney before submitting tO County Manager· The Manager's Office ,mil distribute copies: B. /X/ County Manager agenda file: /X/ Requesting Division: /X/ Original to Clerk's Office Other hearincs: Imitating Division Hes¢ to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining s copy for file. FOR (~L, ERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY _O~,',e Re,':.e~ved Date Adver~sefi Date of P.H, RES()I.L'TI()N N(). 9X- : : Itl. St )l.t Il'It )N FOP, I'li II i It )N AV 9"-/12,~ TO RIiN( ~t 'N¢'E ANI ) a I)ISt 'I..\I,M All. RI(HI l S AND IN'! ERL;STS O1: 'I IIF. COt :N'I'T : ANI) PI 'ltl 1(' re)..\~ ','F.$% ,IN(;RIiSS E(;RF. SSI ..\ND 'rRAVI;L ', I'I'~)N III1! F()I.I.<)WINb R()ADWAYS IJ){'AIEI) WI'IlliN I-~ }XI'IRF .~l 'ltl )l%'~g',, ~'; AND I'I...\N N I~I) INI'I s I)IiVFLOI'.MFNI'. lll~.~I.. ROADWAYS DEt'I('FED AND '~ DES~'I(II~ED IN 11t1: PI.Ar {)F FOXFIRE UNIT ONE. PLAT I,: BI~I~K 13. PAGI:S ~ lllROI;~;ll gt~, AND I"OXFIRI~ UNIt' !~ TIIREIL I'I. AI' BOOK I~. PAGES 101 'IIIROI;~;II IO3. I'UIII.IC ',: RFC'ORDS OF I'(~II. IFR t'(~I'N'IY, FI.ORII)A. PROVIf)IN(; I; Ft~R TIlE U()N'FINtlN<~ ANI) t'NAI.'FEC'IED I~ EASEMEN~ tlOLDERS. FMERGENCY MEDICAL AND FIRE ',~ SERVR'ES. COI.IlER ~'OI.'N~f WA'IER MANAGEMENT I,, VFIH('I.ES AND PFRfi~ )NNH.. COI.I.IER COl 'N'I'Y I' '11{A NSP¢.IRTA I ION ~ I:111~ '1 I:S. I'ERSI/NNEL AND I~ I'I:RMITI'ING. AND ~'[)I.[.IER COUNTY WATER.SEWER I'l I)IS'IRRq' VFIIICIFS AND I'ERSONNI{L; I'R(IVII)INI; AN ~' I'l'l'h{ ' 11VI: DAIE 2', :2 WI IEREAS. pursuanl to Sccnons 330J)9 and 336.10, Florida SlalUleS, Kennelh 2~ I'u,,'lcr J:,,q , ;IS Ag~fll J~ff p~lltlOO~t, J:oxJlre ('UllllHIltllly Assoclaliorl of Collier County, Jilt.. 2J hil~ pCllllOlled tile Board or f'ounly ('o/ll/lllSSlOllk. Js lo rcflounce arid disclaim any righl or thc 2F ('uunlv ,md II~e Public lo access (ingress cgrcssl ,md Iravel upon Ihe plalled roadwa)s localed Z,, '~.hm t,~lire Subdivision and Planned [.'nil Dc~eJupme/ll, except ~ specifically scl forth m 2- ihis Res, lulmn; and :s WItEREAS. the road~va~s are described ~ those plan~ roadways dcdtcaled to ?; the use .f the general Public and located within Foxfire Units One and Three and legally 3o described as follows: :1 Sec Exhibit "A" attached ilcrc:o ami mcoq~orated here:n; ~; WtIERFAS. lhe Board has :his da% held a public bearing lo CO:lSidCr Iht' pclillon ]3 1o rc[IOmlcc and disclaml Ibc r~gJlt o1' the Courtly and Public to access lingrcs~egress~ and .u lraxcl upon ~aitl mads~ays and r~ghts-of-x~aF, cxccpl as specifically holed and providmJ below. 3~ and nemco of said pubhc hearing ~as g~xen as rcqtmcd by law; and )~, WttEREAS. l]le grating of this pompon is mlended lo ~d shall only renounce ? and thsclaim ll~e Public's rigbl Io access lingress egress) and travel upon such roadways, and :$ all olhcl casement rights and Counlv access rights as specilically described hclow shall be ao NOW, TIIEI~EFORE, BE II' REfi()IVED BY TIlE BOARD OF ('OLTN'FY dl ('()MMISSIONERS (.)l- t'OI.LIER COL'N'I Y. I'I.URIDA. Ihat: 42 1 l'hc Bodrd hcrd)y dc~cmnncs and makes the fiqiox~ing findings: 43 .~ Ihc adoplmn of Ibis Resolut,on Io rci~t,unce mid disclaim Ihe righl of the Courtly ~4 and Iht Pubhc lo access ~mgre~segress) and Iravel u~n the below-described J5 ,~adx~ays. except as spcc~:icall~ retained and reserved herein, is in d~e best 46 inlcrcsts of thc Pubhc. 4~ l, Ibc eounlv slmll haxe ' ~ re .... :, and repair 4s l]oard's adoption of llns Res,.,hmon ~ c l::e adoption of this Resolution is not injurious it)thc Public ~ei£are or the ~ ,nd~ ,dual property rights of any c~cnlcn[ holder or property o~ner. .~ 2 'Ibc ~;~.t~ uf the County and the Publlc to access (mgres~egressl ~d tr3~el upon thc a Iblh,~ ii;g platted roadways: ~ Sec Exhd~lt ".A" attached hereto and mco~oraled herein ~i berth:, rcm~unccd 3 '['IHS Resolution lo renounce and thsclaml the County and thc Pub::c's right to access ~ ~ingrcs& egress} and travel upon the above-described roadways shall not affect m any way ': ca~c:~:u'nts ~hlch have been granted or dedicated through the plat to ~}' se~'~cc provider ~,~ or other enmy including, but not limited ~o. electrical utilities, telephone sec'ice providers. II or cablc¥1sion providers. Florida Pox~'cr & Light. Sprint Telephone. Media One. and their 12 successors and assigns. The access rights of such sca'ice p,o~idcrs shall be unafl~ctcd by I ] Ihis Resolution. Ia 4. l'hc Counlydoes not disc[amlor renounce, and specifically retains fill rights for itsclf and 15 all emergency se~'ices, the right lo ingress egress and travel upon Ibc above-described It, mad~<,s for emergency sc~'~ccs including, but Ilot Iinliled lo, thc Collier County I' Sheriffs Depamnent or oilier lag' enforcement agencies, thc East Naples Fire Control I~ [)~sl~c{ and other lire control cntit~es, and ("oilier Counly Emergency Medical Sca'ices I,~ and olhcr emergency medical providers. 20 ~. The L'oulHy does not renounce or disclaim, and specifically retains ~d rese~'cs to itselL 21 thc right to regress egress and traxel upon the above.described roadways for purposes of 22 pro~ iding tile follox~ rog: 2a b. Engineering Sc~'ices; and 25 c. Installation. Maintenance and Operation of L:tillty Fac:hUes and Sc~'ices 21, by the County or Colller County Water-Sug er Districl. 27 O. The ('otmty specifically retains and resenes to ilself the right to issue Righl-ogway 2s l'cnmts b? Collier County for access to and instaltalion, maintenance and operal~on of 2o faclhHes or ulilit~es ~s ilh lhe abose-descrtbed rond~a?s and r:ghts-of-way including, but :o n,~l immcd :o. elcctrlcal ut:JiHes. ~clcphone seT, ~ct' pro% ~ders and cabJe~ is:on pro~ idcrs. ~i I aJ, tJic:, tho (.'ouHty speclficall} retains and rcscrxcs to HsclI' and Lhe public access to alld 1~ ,,% t'l lilt' rights-of-~ ay including the s:tlc~ alk Ibr Iloll-IllOkq ~ged. bicycle, pedestrian usc. :3 g. Xl.mHcnance ami repair of Ibc road~ays, s~de~alks and drainage described herein shall be 3a Ibc responsibility of the petmo.er. Foxfire ('ommuni~> Associalion of C'oll~cr County. 35 lac . after the effective date of this Rcsolullon. 3e, BE IT FURTItER RESOLVED. that thc request to renounce and disclaim the 37 rights o[ Ibc Cotltlly and the Public 1o access Imgrcss. egress} and travel upon the above. *s described road~t;l?s shall be spread upoll thc lllinutes of file Board of County Commissioners 3'I aS plot Itlcd ltl ScCtiO~I 33t, 10. Florida Slatutcs. 40 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED. that the not~ce of thc adoption of this resolution 41 by Ibc {'ommissioners shall bo published one IHnc. wllhm thi~y {30) days following its m.l,~H~,t~u., if! -nc ~ssu¢ o1' ancv, s~a['~ur ~f ~cnurul c~rculat~on ~uhbshcd tn ('oll~c~ J'r,.,r oF p,,hJicatJon of not,ce of public ,,c:,r,,l~. the Resolution as ad,)ptcd, ami t,,c proof of 4 Records orColhcr ('oumy. · Bc Il fil~hcr rc~,.ixcd, proper ll~lal:~m c~dcncmg lhls R~solullorl sh.dl bc m~dc t~ ,m :he pla~s of Foxfire Um~s One and Three .is Icgally described above. BE IT FUR I'IIER RESOt. VEI). fl~al flus Resolution shall be cfl~cmc up~m 9 Tlus resolulson .Jdt~pted aJ~er l]JoJJOll, secolld aJid majority vote favori,~ same th~s l0 day of , IggS. II ~ AT I I[S'I': BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 14 l.)~k I( ;I I'1' E. BROCK. ('lcrk COI.LIER ('OUNTY, FLORIDA I~, By .... B>' 17 {)ClUib· Clerk BARBARA B. BERRY. ('haimmn Iq 2,~ Approved as Io firm and 21 leu.d sul'i]c~encv: 24 Hcldl F. Ashlofl .'~ss~stant County 27 .11 Road Names: Foxfire Lane. Kings Way and Miscellaneous Circles. Courts, Drives. Ways. and Lanes as d~:ribed below. Location: Section 6 Township 50 South Range 26 East Legal Description: Ester Avenue (approximately 180 feet) as rezorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One. Plat Book 13. pages 84 through 86: Foxbmsh Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86: Foxfire Lane as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13. pages 84 through 86: Foxhound Drive as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13. pag}s 84 through 86; Foxhunt Way as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13. pages 84 through 86; Foxtrot Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86: Kin£s Way as recorded in the Plats o1": Foxfire Unit One. Plat Book 13. pages 84 through 86 and Foxfire Unit Three. Plat Book 13. pages 101 through 103: Foxs 'Den Circle as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit Three. Plat Book 13. pages 101 through 103: Foxtail Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit lhree, Plat Book 13. pages 101 through 103; All as recorded in the Public Records of Collier Count.,,'. Florida. co..t , Co ie .1 2 C CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURIHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST I~O. BOX 413044 CIRCUIT COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-304.4 COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER Dwight E, BrecE CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS February 24, 1998 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition AV-97-028: Petition by the Foxfire Community Association, Inc., as more fully described on the enclosed Notice of Hearing. Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. Any questions regarding this Petition should be directed to Russ Muller, Engineer, County Transportation Department at: (941) 774-8494. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on March 24, 1998 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition AV-97-028, Kenneth B. Cuyler, as agent for Foxfire Community Association, Inc., requesting that the Board renounce and disclaim all rights and interests of the County and Public to access (ingress/egress) and travel upon the following roadways located within Foxfire Subdivision and Planned Unit Development; those roadways depicted and described in the Plat of Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, Pages 84 through 86, and Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, Pages 101 through 103, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; providing for the continuing and unaffected rights of easement holders, emergency medical and fire services, Collier County water management vehicles and personnel, Collier County transportation vehicles, personnel and permitting, and Collier County Water-Sewer District vehicles and personnel; providing an effective date. The streets proposed to be vacated include the following: Road Names: Foxfire Lane, Kings Way and Miscellaneous Circles, Courts, Drives, Ways and Lanes as described below. Location: Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Legal Description: Estey Avenue (approximately 180 feet) as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxbrush Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One Plat Book 13 pages 84 through 86; Foxfire Lane as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One Plat Book 13 pages 84 through 86; ' Foxhound Drive as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13 pages 84 through 86; Foxhunt Way as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13 pages 84 through 86; Foxtrot Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One Plat Book 13 pages 84 through 86; Kings Way as recorded in the Plats of: Foxfire Unit One Plat Book 13 pages 84 through 86 and Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 12C 2' 13, pages 101 through 103; Fox Den Circle as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, pages 101 through 103; Foxtail Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, pages 101 through 103; All as recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All interested parties are invited to attend, to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board Drior to the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) · County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST PO. BOX 413044 CIRCUIT COURT NAPLES. FLORIDA 34101-3044 COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER Dwight E, Brock CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS February 24, 1998 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition AV-97-028: Petition by the Foxfire Community Association, Inc., as more fully described on the enclosed Notice of Hearing. Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. Any questions regarding this Petition should be directed to Russ Muller, Engineer, County Transportation Department at: (941) 774-8494. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 12C 2 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on March 24, 1998 in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition AV-97-028, Kenneth B. Cuyler, as agent for Foxfire Community Association, Inc., requesting that the Board renounce and disclaim all rights and interests of the County and Public to access (ingress/egress) and travel upon the following roadways located within Foxfire Subdivision and Planned Unit Development; those roadways depicted and described in the Plat of Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, Pages 84 through 86, and Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, Pages 101 through 103, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; providing for the continuing and unaffected rights of easement holders, emergency medical and fire services, Collier County water management vehicles and personnel, Collier County transportation vehicles, personnel and permitting, and Collier County Water-Sewer District vehicles and personnel; providing an effective date. The streets proposed to be vacated include the following: Road Names: Foxfire Lane, Kings Way and Miscellaneous Circles, Courts, Drives, Ways and Lanes as described below. Location: Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Legal Description: Estey Avenue (approximately 180 feet) as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxbrush Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxfire Lane as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxhound Drive as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxhunt Way as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Foxtrot Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86; Kings Way as recorded in the Plats of: Foxfire Unit One, Plat Book 13, pages 84 through 86 and Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book · 120 2 13, pages 101 through 103; Fox Den Circle as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, pages 101 through 103; Foxtail Court as recorded in the Plat of: Foxfire Unit Three, Plat Book 13, pages !01 through 103; All as recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All interested parties are invited to attend, to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board prior to the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) i2C 2 ('4 . 0 Oi ' 0 ~ ~= z~ ~z~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ - ~ ~ oo oo U ~ ~ .- ~ ~ ~~ O0 ~ ~ < ~ ~ 0 Z ~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ oo >oo ~~~ ~oo ~ ~, ~ ~ ~o~-- ~o~°~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ~._ 0 ~ ~ ~ o o WE, TI4E UNDERSIGNED, ASK THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE FOR PRIVATIZATION OF THE FOXFIRE COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITY AND TO RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM ALL RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND PUBLIC TO ACCESS (INGRESS/EGRESS) AND TRAVEL UPON THE ROADWAYS OF THE FOXFIRE COMMUNITY. 1,'0-2 PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, ASK THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE FOR PRIVATIZATION OF THE FOXFIRE COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITY AND TO RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM ALL RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND PUBLIC TO ACCESS (INGRESS/EGRESS) AND TRAVEL UPON THE ROADWAYS OF THE FOXFIRE COMMUNITY. 12C 2 PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, ASK THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE FOR PRIVATIZATION OF THE FOXFIRE COUNTRY CLUB COMN/INITY AND TO RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM ALL RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND PUBLIC TO ACCESS (INGRESS/EGRESS) AND TRAVEL UPON THE ROADWAYS OF THE FOXFIRE COMMUNITY. . ~1 I 21 2 ' ' '~ ~ '.' / , .,. ~ ,...,I, , 22. 3 "' " '" '' / "' .... ' 23. 4 "" 24. 5 ""' ' 25 6 ~ ~, "~ ' ;'" ' ~ ' ' '.'" .... ' 26 ~. ,' .,. / _. ( :~.. , ' ' :2'7 ~o. ,/' !' , :--' .' ' ~-'" '"' ": ')o 11. '~C ,'," .- .~, ,',-,'~ -' ' ' ' ' 31 Z6. 36. 17. 37. Z8. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE U%;DERSIGNED, ASK THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE FOR PRIVATIZATION OF THE FOXFIRE COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITY AND TO RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM ALL RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND PUBLIC TO ACCESS (INGRESS/EGRESS) AND TRAVEL UPON THE ROADWAYS OF THE FOXFIRE COMMUNITY. ,/ ., ~,. ~,'~,/ / 15. ~.-,~.., -'-'~ .~ .' ... .,~ 35. 16 / '' '~ ' ' ' '' '" 36 18..//, i - .... ''-~" ~C ;:,~':'"~8 ~"~~ ~ ' -- i~~m ~~g ~ , ,,. ,, T/..,-,' ~""' ." ,.,,, , .,~..,,.. ...:~.,...... / ,.,. ,....... ~.,/. -. ~ :"-~~ " '. '.- - ' ..m,,',"',- :.' .. '-. ~ /.~ >~ ~.-.:, ..... , ]2¢ 2 PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, ASK THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE FOR PRIVATIZATION OF THE FOXFIRE COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITY AND TO RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM ALL RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND PUBLIC TO ACCESS (INGRESS/EGRESS AND TRAVEL UPON THE ROADWAYS OF THE FOXFIRE COMMUNITY. 2 6 26 .... 7 27. ..~ ,'.. ' . .... . PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, ASK THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE FOR PRIVATIZATION OF THE FOXFIRE COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITY AND TO RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM ALL RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND PUBLIC TO ACCESS (INGRESS/EGRESS) AND TRAVEL UPON THE ROADWAYS OF THE FOXFIRE COMMUNITY. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, ASK THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE FOR PRIVATIZATION OF THE FOXFIRE COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITY AND TO RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM ALL RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND PUBLIC TO ACCESS (INGRESS/EGRESS) AND TRAVEL UPON THE ROADWAYS OF THE FOXFIRE COMMUNITY. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, ASK THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE FOR PRIVATIZATION OF THE FOXFIRE COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITY AND TO RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM ALL RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND PUBLIC TO ACCESS (INGRESS/EGRESS) AND TRAVEL UPON THE ROADWAYS OF THE FOXFIRE COMMUNITY. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, ASK THE BOA2qD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE FOR PRIVATIZATION OF THE FOXFIRE COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITY AND TO RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM ALL RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND PUBLIC TO ACCESS (INGRESS/EGRESS) AND TRAVEL UPON THE ROADWAYS OF THE FOXFIRE COMMUNITY. 2 1 ' '. ":' ' 8 ~)' ' .... ' '~" '~ ' , t~>> ," ":." , ~ ..... I 28 · . ,' .... 30 12. "~"' ' ' '/'~'I '"" ' ., ~¢ 32 ,.., , , .. // 13. , ' '' '" '" 33 14. '-'' '/t/' '~ ...... ¢ / 34 15. 35 16. 36 17. 37. 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. OPPOSED FAVOR OPPOSED FAVOR ISSUE: ~~~- ~~d~ t OPPOSED FAVOR /07 ,~ , ,'~ ~1 ~/~ ~. ~z ~ ~ ~z / ~~ -. OPPOSED FAVOR d.~' ~~ _ ~,~- ~,, 12C ?- OPPOSED FAVOR ! OPPOSED FAVOR /~/ ]~$$UE: ~ ~ 12C FOXFIRE ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION TABLES (DATA) COLLECTOR /COLLECTOR ~ · VOLUME (vpd) 3,100 >4,000 >4,000 >2,000 to 4,000 up to 2,000 · SPEED (mph) 25 >40 >30~ ~ = 30 J _<30 · RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAYS Yes No No Yes Yes KINGS WAY OPEN (MISMATCH) '~ KINGS STREET TYPE CHARACTERISTICS WAY ARTERIAL MAJOR MINOR LOCAL (DATA) COLLECTOR COLLECTOR . VOLUME (vpd) 10,300 >4,0~~0 ~-~4.00~ >2,000 to 4,000 up to 2,000 · SPEED (mph) 25 >40 >30 ~ _<30 · RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAYS Yes No No Yes REF: . VOLUME = MPO TRIP GENERATION DATA (YR 2024) · STREET TYPE CHARACTERISTICS = CCLDC, DIV63 pgs LDC 6:58 & 6:59. 3~4/"'.~ · £ - ~33545 HapLes OatLyNew$ l 2C 2 Naples, FL 339/,0 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF CO~tlTY COflHISSIOflERS ATTN: NAHCY SALOGUB PO BOX &13016 NOTICEOF PUBLIC HEARING NAPLES FL 34101-3016 Notice Is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a I~Jblic heorlng on MOrch 24, 3rd Floor, Admlnlsfratio~ REFERENCE: 001230 #800835 Building0 Collier ¢ovmv 57653919 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA Gove~nmerd Cen+e~. 3.101 Eost Tomlr~ml Troll NODle$° Flor'ldo. The State of Florida meeting will begin of 9:00 AJ~. County of Collier The Board will co~lder PetlNo~ AV.97-02~, Ken. Before the undersigned authority, personally n~n B..(~u.y[~_os__.o~e..n~.. appeared AngeLa Bryant, who on oath says that she oS. Foxflre UnH Three, serves as Assistant Secretary of the Naples Daily Plat Book 1l~'u~; 101 th~ou~ News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in FOXTAIL COURT Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy recorded In the Plot of: Foxflre Unit Three, da,e.°f . ver,,.i. lis,ed. wa. publi.hed in .aid ..sp.,er on poges i ough ; All os re, reded In Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily ..~uu_k eecor~ of C~. News is a newspaper published at Nap[es, in said i-- IlerCour~v'Florld" Collier County, Florida, and that the said ~erested per, es ore In-, v~red fo ottend, fo register newspaper has heretofore been continuously fo ksoe~ ond to s~t~nlf: published in said Collier County, Florida, each ~e obtectk~s, If ~v, In. day and has been entered as second class ~ail tothel~bTIcheorlng. ·atter at the post office in Uaples, in said Any per,on who decJd- es fo c~oeol o declslo~ of Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year the B~x~rd will need o re- next preceding the first publication of the cord of ff~e ~oceedlr~s attached copy of advertisement; and affiant ~eretorex ~ nee~ ~o further says that she has neither paid nor ensure mot o promised any person, firm or coporation any is mode, whk:h record discount, rebate, commission or refund for the cludes the testimony purpose of securing this advertisement ion evkJence ~ which ~e oPPeol Is to be hosed. publication in the said newspaper. BOARD OF COUNTY COMA~IS.~ON~R$ COLLIER COUNTY, PUBLISHED ON: 03/08 FLORIDA 'BARBARA B, BERRY, CHAIRN~AN ' DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK iBy: /S/ EIIle Hoffmon, j ~ Clerk . NO. 11637.~ AD SPACE: 142.0(X) ZNCH FZLED ON: 03/09/98 ~/~.,,: ~ ~ ~,, ,1'-. ~./)~,/,~,', .,, ' / Signature of Affiant Sworn to and Subscribed before me this ,/': ' day of .'",' ~ 19.~/-~ Personally known by me /.' ,/~.' ' ~', ~.' i,,,.-, ' ' 12C Collier County, Florida REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk of the Board: Please place the following as a: / X/ Normal Legal Advertisement / ~'~/ Other: (D~sp!ay Adv.. location, etc.) Originating Dept/Div: Transportation/Public Works Person: Rick Grigg Date: February 1 I. 1998 (Sign clearly) ,1~", ~ ~,~:/~=,-,~,, Petition No. (If none, give brief description): AV 98-003 Petitioner: (Name & address): Dubsdread Enterprises, Inc., 3471 River Gardens Circle, Pensacola, FL 32514-8162 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: See List of Adjacent Property Owners (If more space needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before: IX/BCC / /BZA / /Other Requested hearing date: March 24, 1998. Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important IX/, /X/ Naples Daily News or legally required/X/) / / Other Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common locations & size): I'IJTITIOX ..\V OF A 7..~' WII)L" [:'FII.ITY IL.\SI!MI!NT ,\I.()N(i 'rile I:.AS'I'I{I,tI.Y ?..~' ()F I.()T 11. P,I.OCK oo...\('COI,tl)INt; I('~ I'IIE Pl..VI' OF "NAPLI'_'S I':\IIK UNIT .~"..IS 1~,1£(.'()I~,1)l!I) IN I'I...\T Ii(~)K 3. l'..\(iti 14. PVBI.IC RF,('OP, I).'; ()F ('()l.l.ltiP, FI.ORID^. Companion petition(s), if any. & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee Include Advertising Cost? Yes/X/ No .,-V If yes. what account should be charges for advertising costs 101-163610-649100 Division Head Ed Ilschner County Administrator Robert F. Fernandez List Atlachmenls: (1) Resolution (2) Legal DescripI~on (3) List of Adjacent Property Owners DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCe or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitling to Counly Manager. Note: If legal documents is involved, be sure that any necessary_ legal review, or reouest for same. is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's Office will distribute copies: B. /X/ County Manager agenda fire; /X/ Requesting Division; /X/ Original to Clerk's Office Other heari0gs: Initiating _Division Head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'$ OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received Date Advertised Date of P.H. 12C 3 'illlllli1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.111111 III III ~o ~- i~ ooo o~' 5~ c~ a o~ocoo~oooo~ ~ . ELLIE a0Fgt~t{ - ~S & RECORDS. I " LOCATION: Collier County c0Urthou'se ~ U6.' (8~L3) 774-8408 , " x:,Eoz~m'~o: (813) 774-8~06 ,, ,., ~ ii.,,.. I ~ ~ I I I iii IIII 12C February 18, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-98-003 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice two times, one time on Sunday, March, 8, 1998 and one time on Sunday, March, 15, 1998 and send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Sincerely, Jody S. Kuehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. Acct. No. 101-163610-649100 126 $ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition AV-98-003, Terry Kepple, P.E., of Kepple Engineering, Inc., as agent for the petitioner, Dubsdread Enterprises, Inc., requesting to vacate a portion of a 7.5' wide Utility Easement along the Easterly 7.5' of Lot 11, Block 69, according to the Plat of "Naples Park Unit 5", as Recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 14, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All interested parties are invited to attend, to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board prior to the Public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Jody S. Kuehne, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 12C 3 February 18, 1998 Dubsdread Enterprises, Inc. 3471 River Gardens Circle Pensacola, FL 32514-8162 RE: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-98-003 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998 and Sunday, March 15, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Jody S. Kuehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. cc: Edward J. Snyder Terry Kepple, P.E. 12g 3 February 18, 1998 Edward J. Snyder, Et Ux c/o Iserman Bookeeping Dept. P.O. Box 477 Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724-0477 RE: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-98-003 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998 and Sunday, March 15, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Jody So Kuehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. cc: Dubsdread Enterprises, Inc. Terry Kepple, P.E. 120 February 18, 1998 Terry Kepple, P.E. Kepple Engineering, Inc. 568 Commercial Blvd. Naples, FL 34104 RE: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-98-003 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998 and Sunday, March 15, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Jody S. Kuehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. cc: Dubsdread Enterprises, Inc. Edward J. Snyder 12fi County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COtLfE~ COUNTY COURTHOUSE 330~ I'AMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 4f3044 CIRCUIT COURT NAPtE$, FLORIDA 34101-30~ COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER Dw~ght E. Brock CLERK BOARD OF ClerR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS February 18, 1998 Re: Notice of Public Hearing re Petition AV-98-003 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to the petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998 and Sunday, March 15 , 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Jody S. Kuehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. IIEN()I,I ~'I'i()N N(), RI.S( )1 I ~'11( )N I,( )1( I'li I H I( )N AV ,)~.~ ~ I ~ ) VA( 'A I'E A I~l)l( I'1( )N ~ ~1.' A ~' ~VII~F Ir'I'll.Il Y I~..~I~NII(NI' Ai.(~N(~ IIIE I~ASIEI(I.Y 7.~' ()F I.()1' II. I~1 ~)('~ ~ff). AC('()RI)IN(~ '1()'I'IIE PI.Al ()1.' "NAPI.E~ PARK RE('()I(I)I~I) IN I'I.AT I;()()K ~. I'At;F 14.1'1~131.I(' RI~C()RI)S ()F ('()I.I.II~R ~'~,1 :N'I Y. I:1.~ )I(II)A. ~VI II[I(I(AS. ptl~Sll;Inl h~ ~cclmn I 77. IIII. I' h~l ~d;i Sl;llulcs. I ~'rry Rcpplc. ILl:.. ~1' KcppIc I(n~mccrm~. Inc.. as a~cnl fi,~ Iht pcfili~mc~, l)~l,~drc~d I(ntcrpri~cs. Inc.. d~cs hereby request Iht vac:~t~.n ~1' a p~rli.n .1' a 7.Y ~idc l'tility I::~cmcnt ~m I.~t I I. I3l~ck 6q. "N;q~lcs Park I:nit I:kc". and k'il~lll~lll ;is IiR~[~ fully described bcl,~x~. ;md ll~l~c'~' ~1 ~:ml public hearing rcqt6r~'d hv ~VlII(I(IL,X~, Iht ~r,mtm; ~I fl~c ~;~c,m~n ~11 n,,t ~sd~crscl);~llcct tl~c .~ncrship ,,r right ~;t)Xk'. IIIliRI,.I'~I(I.. I~1.. II RI.N~I,VII) I5Y IIIE I~L,~I(I) ~)1' ('(~I:NIY ('()NIMI~It)NI(RS ()1: ('~)I.I.IER ('~)1 'NIY. H.f)RII)A. thal Iht l't~lh~x~ing bc :md is hereby ~ ac al~'d; C~l~} ~1 Ihls I(us.luli~m in thc Ihiblic Rcc~rd~ ~t l'~llicr ~'~umly. l:l~fid:~, and I Ins rcs~,hJIhm ad~l~lC~l allot Ill,fibril. xc~'~,ll~t ,llltl fn;~ril) v~)[c l~l~oHil~ I)A I I(I): I)~VI( iii I I(. II1(~ )CK. Clerk I '~ ~1.1.11:1( ('l Il ~NIY. I"I.()I~II)A :::) 0 0 ~ L J; ¢~ oc: co ~, r.. CC ('4 r,, + ..I cz: u.)cr ' U] u)q' U)~' LU I ,,~ C) .JO, ...,j ~ ...2 ..Jo .-;co ~-~ ..J ,4" ~4'~ Z.J Z.d Zq' Z--14' .~ ! ,, CD 4' I ,4' r ,,,-, f'~ t ,d'O ,OC') I~- 0 C~', h.. i g ,,M ..0 ' ~ lf'd ¢.. ~ :,.,4 Ul O.J .~ O..J Z ; t. jc~. ,. - I--./ ,'". ,..J *'~ F-_J< < U'l~' , >- ! 0¢3 n'UJ ~a:UJ U. f'" C3 I ~ur~ ~,dl-- CDU J,.X 0 cz: C) L,U .< 0 UJC)LUO .-.,-*'-JO la.~ U. J t I,,u 0 L'"~ U..J ~. ,'".D 3=0,.-, --/ 2=0,-. ::: a.,.-, ~Oe-...~ .,Znon... c~,-~ L,U, ~ J I~,< ~J ,0 o 4 0 0t~ ~'~ ,-~Og-- m% ,.4 0t~- ~') ~,4 01~,0 e~/O i~ e,4 126 5 Z~x 0 o 120 3 Pt.~"l' UNIT NO. 5 SECTIONS Z~ AND33, t a. SS,IRT. 5 E ....... . O::)L LI ER COUNTY, FLORIDA ................. a+ ............. :~., ................ .~.....~ ................................. ~,. ................. .:,_ .-. .... . -! .............................. 7-~--,1.1 ;.',..':-".,';.:,::::;" '"' ................... ............. '."2 ................... ,'-. .............................. ,,'L:!'- " · ,, ' · '~,,',."'-";"" '"""" '" ' "' ' .... ' "~ '"""""'""""""4~""" . .,,.L~. ................................ · ,..~ *.:, ...... . -.-, ~_~.,. -- ./¥~:; ...................................... ............................. ,~, ~ ............... . -' . ........ ;,.. ~.~ ................................ ~ ~ .............. .............. .,~ ._ ..... 55' ,, ~. 12C 3 4% IN / IN DEC 2'4 IN JAN[ 17. IN FEB i 0~. ~NT DU£ 2,6~4.6 2,682.2 2 709.92 2,737.57 2.765. VALUE MILI,,pA, TE[ AMOUNT ALrTHORITY I PAT IN U.S. FUNDS TO: / AO ,ALmqm TAXES COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLEC~R ~ C 1'~d, 5,~ 3. 7265 497.59 COUN, 5 · 8340 ? 7 ~. 98 SCHOOl.* STATE COURTHOUSE COMPLEX. BU~LO~NG C~t- 2. 5900 345.83 SCHOOL* LOCAl. NAPLES. FLOfllDA34112-4997 CiTY 133.52 1o065 142.25 DEPENDENT ~ MILl,CODE I ,~ [ ESCHOWCODE ~05~'~__ 5620 ~5.04 1.182~ 157.84 mo[P.s~mAc SNYDER ET ~, EDWARD J 0535 7.14 VOTE, APPR. OEeT. % ISERfqAN BO,~KEEPING DEPT 15.013~ 2,004.67 2 PO BOX 477 m mm COLD SPG HER NY 11~24-0~ ~ ~ ~22~ ~ , ? 6 ~ 22 COMeZNEO TOTALI NAPLES PARK UNIT~ BLK 69- PAID - 9T/tl/19 LOTS 11 + 12 ~R 460 PG 188 REC~ 4279.06 GUY L CARLTON - TA~ COLL~,? 0000062782280005 00(]0276522 0000000000 00000 SEE REVERSE SlOE FOR I:URTHER INFORMATION THIS AREA FOR TAX COLLECTORS OFFICE USE ONLY Rick Grigg Transportation Dept. Collier County, 3301 E. Tamiami Tr. Naples, FL 34104 January 26, 199g Re: Easement Vacation Ut/livy Easement Naples Park, Unit 5 East 7.5 feet, Lot ! I Block 69 Dear Mr. GHgg, Enclosed, please find a copy of the unrecorded deed(s) for the referenced project. The owner, Jordan lserman, President, Dubsdread Enterprises has not recorded his deed since he has been paying on the mortgage held by Edward Snyder, rather than assuming the mortgage. I trust this will clarify the ownership ofthe property. If you have any questions, please call. Respectfully, Terrance L. Kepple, P.E. Kepple Engineering, Inc. , '" : · ?:~.' ~ · .,f 50 ~vler Avenue. Clarencc I~O)l p&n res of the second TE~ ~D O~ER VALVABLE CO~SIDE~ATIOgS ............................ to bin t~ hand pud by ~e.id piti res of the ~cond psfl. the receipt ~hereof ~ hereby I~kflowJedfed. h8 s ~aflted. b~rilfled. ~d Mid to the said piti le~ of the ~cond Chert hel~ lad ~lKns for*Yet, the folJowiflf desr~bed lend. situate, and bemf iff the Couflly of Collier , S~e of Florida ,t~wil: aCcord~fl8 to the I*l.Jt thereof, recorded In Pl~t ~ok 3. P,t~e to S/gna O. PoSue, vhlch a~sll~rnt vas recorded February 22, 1971, In Official Record ~ok 3a6, PaSe :02, PubLic Records ~f Co~lter County. Florida; Subject to Second eort~aKe between Grantor hereto and Katherine P. Altch$~on. ~y a, 19~1, recorded ~v 6, 1971, In O[(LcL3Z Record ~o~ 395, PoKe 787, vhi~h ~rt~aKe vas ais[Kned to'Char~e~ R. Kersey and H~ldred ~. Ker~e~, hu~ba~ and ulfe, vh~ch Isst~nc vas recorded September 2~, 1971, ~n Offtcla~ Recocd ~ok &16, PiKe 61&, Public Records of Collier County, rZortda, grantees he~etn do ,~xree and ~ay [he~e ~ftAaRe~. And the sa~d pa~ y of ~h~ first pA~ do es he,rehy fully ~ arrnni th,' title to said land. and will defend the ~me afminsl ihe [R~'ful cllim~ of nil P,'~)n~ whom~eYer. ~n ~i~SS ~tr[o[, Th~atdpa~:,. ,fthrfi.t ;,a~ha~ hereunteA~t ~,~ hand and spal th. day and y,'ar ftmt ahoxe N~ Si~n~d. ~led and delivered .] t.e pres,.nc~ ,,~: : iserman and iscrnlan. Attorneys ': ' 3T Main Street. P,O. ~ox 477 Cold Rprin~ Harbor. New Vork 11724-0477 Tel: (fl6) 6~2.~000 Fax: (516) 692-500,1 Edilh Co~ba~, Parale~al and · ~ · , FACSI5111.~ MESSAGE Date: J~u~' 22. I To: Kettlc Enginccrin~ Compan/ ~R: To.ncc Kettle F~x N~t: 941-40~.I 287 Time: ~35 PM From: l~e~m~ ~d [sc~an. Reply ~ Jordan M lscrman. ~sq. Subject Maacr: Dubsdrcad wilh Win~eld. ~ascmcnt abandonm¢nl a of P~s Including ~his Cover sheet: ~ Tc~: De~ Mt. Ko,lc: l ~vard hcrcith copies or,he deeds in question wilh respect to the Snydcr parcel. Plc~e be advised ~hat d~c purchasc w~ made sub.icc1 lhe outstand~n~ morlgage held by Ameri~ ~d thc dccds wcrc no~ recorded i~ view of thc fnct thnt d~ere w~ no approval of~c ~sfer subiccl (o ibc mo~gagc a~d wi~h interest ~a~e~ a~ a high lex'el wc did x~h to ~fi~nce. Thc mo~a~e h~ now bec, paid down ~o abou~ $I 1.000.00 and zddilio~ principal paymcm,~ ~tc made each momh in thc amoun~ of $ 5.000.00. I~ ncccss~'. I can record lh~ &ods no~ and tzkc thc morl~a~c payment balance ~d pay off thc morl~age, if required, ahhnugh with ratc~ having come down subst~ly it probably, x~dll not be a,ffroblcm m any. event i~ iust scem~ simpler record ~ deeds when the mo~agc wa,, pa~d off an&,'or thc title ~x:as passed to Winfield. P~c advise as t~ what you feel is thc best scen~io at tl~i~ time. Also. when do you ~i~ ~ere will be a mcctJn8 of thc B.ard for approval of Iht abandonment. ~ I am t~'ing t6 ~ge my travel schedule and trial schedule here in New York Ve~' ~ ~Jrs. ~olclv for the in~ivi~u.l/enfi~ .~ the . et mw.re ~nl nny disclosure, enpsinE, distribution or other ,~c nt the contcn~ of eh;~ Iransmi~inn ;~ prohibited by I~w. l "=1{ .. . [ . fo Dubs.dread Contractin~ & Deve~o[~aentCorp., add,ess~l One Seventh SLreet',P.O.~o~ 24, Key Co~ony ~each,Flo~ida 33051 raises, to'eases, co,weys a.~ conh,~ unto the ~ra.t,,., ell Ihat certui. ~n~ ~ilu~e in Collier Counb',~ida. vi:: Lotu 11 an~ 22, ~Zoek 69, Haples P~k, Uni: accor~%n~e w~th and subject :o the P~at recorded iE Plat Book 3,Page 14, ~1~c Records of Collier Cou~ty, ~lori~a. s~jedd ~ fha= certain mortgage in favor of ~erifkrs~ Federal Sav~n~. & ~an Association, or its assigns, recordu~ i0 OR Gook 1248, Page Z~2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, ~hich the Grantee herein assumes and agrees to pay in accordance w~th its terms { Being~.~d into,dod to be the ~a,ne premises conveyed this d~te tO the ', Grant~ by Edward J. Snyder and Marion D. Snyder, ~usbAnd and wifebby Deed 6~' even date herewith and intended to be recorded' simultaneously · , herewith. , , .~:; ~ ' ] ToO ~r.~,,~ ~,,,,. ' ~ ~o ue and Io ~aold, ,~, .,.,.,, ,./. ,,,,,,,~. i~.~,... ,, , toOecema~'31.~9 90 and ease,tents, restrictions, reservations o~ record :-' and ea~ments and restrictions co~unon ~o the '.. ' .... . ~.........2.: co~r~ ~. ~or~ ....... : ...... ;': ..... :':: ...................... SuZfolk ,, o/fie, duly, :~otizcd in thc Slate ofo,rsald ~nd in thc Count~ ~fo~id to t3~e ~ckn~wlcd~er,~. per~nzlly F_~,r~l and rdar~c~ D. Sr~, husba~J and ~ife ' 119 Hat Road, Cold Spr~ng Harbor, NY 11724 SUSJZC?~%O %hat certain mortgage in favor of Amerifi~:rst Federal Savings'..& Loan A~sociation and o[ its assigns, reco~ed.1n OR Book ~, page ~, Public Records of Col).ier County, Flo~Jda.,.Qhich the Grantee her.tn 'gssumes and agre.es to pay in accordance with '~s' terms. 12g 3 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.· COLLIER COUN~ NAPLES, FLORIDA 33962 · RECEIVED FROM ~tn~{~l ~ B~vel~nm~n~ ADDRESS49 7th ave ~o _CITY Naples~ FL OATE 1/20 19~CHECK NO4343 DESCRIPTION Pe~trfnn ~ A~ qR-o0~ ' INVOICE NO. FUND COST C~TER O~S PR~ECT Ca CK AMOUNT 101 163610 329100 00000 x 1,000.00 1,000.00 DEPARmE~ COPY 10 6 0 6 2 NapLes, FI. 33940 . Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily Hews BOARD OF COUNTY COIIItISSZOf~ERS ATTN: tiANCY SALOGUB NOTICE OF PO BOX 413016 PUBLIC HEARING NAPLES FL 34101-3016 Natlce Is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of CoJIler County, will hold a hearing on TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998, In the Boc~droom, 3rd Floor, Ad. ..mlnls~atlo~ Budcflng, Col. REFERENCE: 00'l:~30 101'1636106491 ,er couns~, Governmem 57657508 HOTZCE OF PUBLIC HEA Center, 3305 East Tamla- mi Troll, Naples, Flarldo. The meeting will begin at State of FLorida e~0 A.M. The Board will consider Petition AV. County of Collier 98.003, Terry Kegole, P.E. Before the undersigned authority, personally of KelAole En~lneerln, g. appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serve: Inc., as ~em far ~e as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples ~'h, es, Inc., recn~esss,~e so vacate a~ ~o Daily News~ a daily newspaper published at Naples, wlae Utillev Eal, eme~.r in Collier County~ FLorida: that the attached asong ~e Eas~-rt¥ ?.S' cC copy of ~:lverti$ing vas published in said Lm I1, Btoc~ re, accaro- nevspaper on dates Listed. Pm~ Un~ ~', a,s Affiant further says that the said NapLes DaiLy ~ Recar~ ~- ~. Nes/s is a newspaper published at NapLes, in said CoLLier County, FLorida, and that the said Ail Interested rxrt~sl newspaper has heretofore been continuously ree~$~,~ so saea~ end SO published in said CoLLier Coun:y, FLorida, each su~n~ rnes~ ot~e~k~ts. ~ i day and has been entered as second class ~aiL ~x~aro ~ ~o ~e matte~ et the post office in NapLes, in said e~,arln~ ~ CoLLier County, FLorida, for · period of 1 year es~nv ~e~sa~ w~ Oecto- next preceding the first publication of the ~he Bocra wgl need o re- card o~ the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant pertae~e S~e~e~e, one further says that she has neither paid nor st~e+arez ~ ~ to proeised any per,on, firm or coporation any record at se~e ~r<ee~nes discount, rebate, coemtsaio~ or refund for the b, ramie, ~ retard purpose of securing this advertisement for caucus ~e to~menv ami evk~.~e u~on wealth t~e pubLication in the said newspaper. Ba~RDIStoObeFba~.eCLoouNTy COM~USS~ONER$ PUBLZSHED 0¢¢: 03/08 03/15 COLLIEI~ COUNTY, FLOC~IOA BARBARA B. BERRY, C~AII~A~AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/ Joo'v S. Kuehne, AD SPACE: 61.000 IUCH MarchS, 15 NO. 1160373 F%LEO Off: 0~/16/98 Signature of Affiant $~orn to and Subscribed before me this / ! day of / 19' , I~F. SOI,UTION NO. 98- 85 RES()I.t ITION FOR PETH'ION AV O8-003 'I'() VACATE A PORTI¢)N OF A 7.5' WII)I.~ IrI'II.H'Y EASI~MENT AI,ONG TIIE EAS'H~RI.Y 7.5' OF I.OT I1. IH.()CK 69. A('C()RDIN(i '1'()'1'111~ PI,AT ()F "NAPI.ES PARK t~NI'I' 5". AS RI~('()RDEI) IN I'I.AT B()()K 3. PA(iI': 14. I'Ui~I.I~ RECORDS O~ COI.I.IER ('()l ~N'I'Y. FI,ORII)A. WI II~REAS, pursuunl to section 177. I01. Florida Statutes. Terry Kcpple. P.E.. o1' Kcpple Engineering. Inc.. as agent fi~r the petitioner. Dubsdread Enterprises, Inc.. does hereby request the vacalion of a portion of a 7.5' wide Utility Easement on Lot I I. Block 69. "Naples Park Unit Five": and WI II.:REAS. Ih~ Board has Ihis day held a public hearing lo consider vacating said casement as more fully described below, and notice o1' said public hearing to vacate was gix en as required by law: and WI II~REAS. the granting of thc vacation will not adversely aflkct thc ownership or right ol'co~wcnicnt access ol'other properly owners. N()W. TIIICRIWORE. BE IT RI.;SOI.VI(I) BY TIlE ll()ARl) ()F C()tYN'I'Y COMMISSI()NI(RS OF C()I.I.IER ('()tJNTY. FI.ORIDA. that thc lblloxving be and is hereby vacalcd: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein I~I( H' I.'t~R'I'IIER RI~S()I.VED. that thc ('lerk is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in thc Public Records of ('oilier ('ounty. Florida. and to make proper IlOlation of Ibis x~lcalion on Ihe recorded plal ixs teK'rented a~vc. I'his r~soltlliOll adopted after illoliOll, sCColld and majority vote I~lx'oring saillC. AT'I'I(ST: I!~ )AR I) ~)F ('()t ~N'I'Y Cf )MM ISSIf )NERS I)Wl(il H' I(. IIR( )('K. t'lcrk ('f)l .I.IER C()I IN'FY. FI.ORIDA Approved as ,o tbrn, and 2299368 0R, 2403 PG: 2117 legal sul'l]cicncy: RICORDBD in O~flCIt~ RlCORD~ ef CO~HI~ C~TY, F~ Ileidi F. Ashton CO~l~ 3.00 Assislant County Attorney Re:n: CLIRK TO T~I 12C OR: 2403 PG: 211 5' ' .F UE N 89' 56 53" W 193.19' 50.02' -- 5-0.02' , Easement to be vccatec~ i N 89' 57' ~i" W 192.16' Description N The East 7.5 Ceet o¢ Lot I~, B~ock 69, Ncpies Park LJn;t 5, cs Recorded in Pt~t ~ook 5, Pcge of the PuDtic Records of Collier Coun[y, Florida Less the Nor[h 5 feet "'~' Winfield ~r~/m/~a Companies Winfield Companies ~ Easemen[ ~ '~ - ~ n ~ ~D .~ ......~ T *** OR: 2403 PG: 2119 Proposed g -~- Parking ~ Proposed Propose~ m Building _ t 57' ~" lO0~h ~av~.. N. (~0' Parking required 9,188 sf/300 = .50.6 s!:::)cces Parking provided 2 handicap .:.%1 regular' ,,,,,,=, Winfield Companies Winfield Companies Le Plan A lZ¢ 4 CoLLier C~ry, Flod'ic~ ~OL~ST FOK L£G~L ~TISZNG (OispLiy ~., l~zt~, e~c.) CSi~ clearly) - _ , .. ~earir~ I~fore: ~ ~ /------7 I~A /---7 Other or tegatty r~ir~ / ,} ~ ~her P~iti~ F~ ~isi~ C~? T~ ' ' : ~3-~3~2-649~00 ~.0.~' Oivisi~ He~ Oite , ~ ~. Oate List ACt~ts:C1) (2) (3) DISTR[~]~ I~ST~I~S A. For hesri~s ~f~ ~ ~ D: initilti~ ~ Jo ~ete -- c~ ~ ~:iin Oivisim He~ ~ll ~f~e ~itti~ to ~ ~. ~TE: If I~a~ ~t is i~l~, ~ ~e that ~ ~ l~at r~i~, o- r~t for s~, is ~ to C~ Att~ ~f~ ~i~ti~ to C~ ~r. The ~r's Office wilt distri~e c~i~: ~ C~ ~ ~ file; ~ R~tJ~ DIYiIi~; ~ ~tltML to CreW's Office I. Other beltings: Intttlttna Oivtlicn kid to ~ ICI ILl:lit orieiMI to Clerk'S Office, retainlre · cmv f,r file, 20 (including this cover) !!i111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 TO: ~,[..~..]]]'D~'I'~I FLAI~iA~AN LOCATION: NAPLES DAILY NE~S FAX NO.: 263-4864 °/~ !11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 FROM: ELLIE HOFFMAN - MINUTES & RECORDS _~ LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX NO: (813) 774-8408 PHONE 'NO: (813) 776-8406 663 ~ 02-23~ 10:50 00°O1'52 92634864 OK 068C~14~ 664 / 02-23~ 11:12 00°03'01 941 995 0823 OK 0688008000~06Cl1~ 665 J 02-23~ 15:46 80'01'51 926,3_48.6.4OK 068C8~008A131 12g February 23, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition CCSL-97-5 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, March 8, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 800551 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition CCSL-97-5, Brett D. Moore, F.E., of Humiston & Moore Engineers, representing Richard G. and Neona L. Cole, requesting a Coastal Construction Setback Line Variance to allow for the reconstruction of an existing residence located at Lot 32, Block A, Re-Plat of Unit 1, Conner's Vanderbilt Beach Estates, Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. All interested parties are invited to attend, to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board prior to the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COM}4ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) February 23, 1998 Mr. Donald W. Arnold, Director Planning Services Department ~" 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34112 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition CCSL-97-5 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure ti i rllllll llllll Illlllllllllllllllll IIIII I IIIIII I --I IIIII - III IIIIIIII I II ............... I February 23, 1998 Mr. Brett D. Moore, P.E. Humiston & Moore Engineers 10641 Airport Road North, Suite 29 Naples, FL 34109 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition CCSL-97-5 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure . 12C RESOLUTION NO. 97- RESOI.UTION APPROVING PETITION CCSi,-97-5, REQUESTIN(; A VARIANCE FROM THE COASTAL CONSTRUCTION SETBACK I,INE (CCSI,) TO ALI.OW THE RECONSTRUCTION OF AN EXISTING RESIDENCE LOCATED AT LOT 32, BLOCK A, RE-PLAT OF UNIT I, CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACll ESTATES, SECTION 29, TOWNSllIP 48 SOUTII, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FI.ORIDA. WtlEREAS, Brctt D. Moore. P.E. of Humiston & Moore Engineers, rcprescn:ing Richard G. and Neons L. Cole, requests a variance from the Coastal Construction Setback Line ('CCSL), as required by the Collier County Ordinance 91-I02, Division 3.13 as amended, to allow for the reconstruction of an existing single family residence; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is approximately 48 feet seaward &the CCSL and will not be more seaward than the existing building; and WHEREAS, the petition is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code, Division 3.13; and WHEREAS, the request is consistent with Objective 11.4 of the Co~servation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier County Grow'th Management Plan; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 91-102 Section 3.9.6.6 requires removal and maintenance for prohibited exotic vegetation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. that: Variancc Pcfition CCSL-97-5 be approved subject to thc following stipulations: '1. /,,II proposed mlprnvemcnls shall be dcslgnetl Itl accordance: with thc slandards ,,f thc Florida Department of Env~ronmenlal Prolccuon (FI)EP) I)iv~s~tm of Beaches and Shores ami an approxcd FDEP pe~it shall be oblained, and cop~cs provided, prior ~o issuance of a Collier Uotmtv Buddmc 2. C'onsm~clion act~vilws shall not ~ccur ~vilhl~ one hundred (100) feet ~1' thc sea turtle nesting zone. defined by Co[lief Cot nty Land Dcvclnpmcnl ('o( c Division 3.1[). ltlrllc ~csting scason, wlthoul I]rsl submillltlg and oblaimng FDEP and Collier Counlv ('onst~cllon In Sea Turtle Nesting Arcs Peru]its. 3. Pe~ilioncr shall nolffy ('u~cnt Planning Environmental Staff one wcck prior ~o commencing work seaward of Ibc CSSL anti shall again contacl Staff within one week following complctmn of work seaward o1' Ihc 4. Outdoor lighling assoc]alcd with constrnclion, or development wilhin three hundred (330~ I~cl of the high lido line, shall be m compliance with D]v~smn 3.10 of the Collier County [.and Development ('ode. ' 5. Petitioner shall uullzc only native coastal dune vcgetatmn ~]r all required on-site landscaping beyond the 1974 Coastal Const~clion Control Line. . 12C 6. Minor revisions to Coastal construction Setback lane Variance CCSL-97.5 I including changes ,n stung and sta'uctures) may be approved, in writing, by the Planning Sem,'ices Director or his/her designee. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DONE AND ORDERED this ~ day of . 1907. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COi. I.IER COUNTY. FLORIDA DATE: A'I~EST: BY: DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk BARBARA B, BERRY. Chairman I) F. PUTY £'LERK Approved ~ to Form and Legal Suftlciency: A~si~tant County Attorney Hap~e~, FL 339~0 Affidavit of Publication Hap[es Daily Hews ~ARD OF C~flTl C~MISSI~tERS ATTN: NAIICY SAL~U8 NOTICE PO ~X ~0~6 ~BLIC~RING NAPLES FL ~10~-~6 ~ce hearing On TUESDAY, MARCH REFERENCE: ~1230 ~551 I1~ C~ 5765~163 ~TICE OF PUBLIC HEA Ce~, 3~1 E~t Tom~ State of FLorida The B~d ~11 County of Cattier Petlt$on CC~.97.5, Br~ Before the undersigned authority, personaLLy D. M~re, P.E~ o~ Humls. appeared Ange~a Bryant, ~ho on oath says that she reprinting Riced G. serves as Assistant Secretary of the tlap:es 0ai[y a~ Ne~a L. C~e, re. N~S, a daily newspaper ~b:Jsh~ at Nap:es, in au~tlng s~u~lon $e~ock LI~ CoLlier County, FLorida: that the attach~ copy v~e re~s~ ~ on exist. of ~verttsJng ~as ~bLish~ in said news~per ~ lng reslde~e ~tes t~st~. L~ 32, 8l~k AsRe~ Affiant further says that the sa~d tlap~es DaiLy Un~ 1, ~rs V~- blU B~h Es~es, N~S JS a ne~s~per published at Hop~es, Jn said ~, Town~ CoLLier County, FLorida, a~ that the said R~ newspaper has heretofore been c~tinuously All I~erest~ pubtish~ in said Collier County, Florida, each ~e Inv~ day a~ has been enter~ as seco~ class ~iL su~ ~elr ~tter at the ~st office in Hopers, in said ~v, in ~, ~ ~e Cattier County, FLorida, for a peri~ of 1 year h~ln~ next preceding the first publication of the Any ~r~ attached copy of advertisement; and affiant ~e ~d ~11 ~ o re. further says that she has neither paid nor c~e ~ promis~ any person, firm or co~ration any ~e~e, discount, rebate, commission or refund for the ~e ~ a v~m put,se of securing this advertisement for ~s ~, which rectal In. publication in the said newspaper, du~s ~e tesfl~v evfde~e D OF COUNTY PUBLISHED ON: 03/~ COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK AD SPACE: 63.~ INCH FILE0 ON: 03/~/98 ~)1 to and Sub~crtb~ before me this ~;' day of ~ ~ S~orn PersonalLy known by me ,,, ~--, ~ }.=~ .Z ...... · 12g 4 RESOI.UTION NO. 97- 87 RESOI,UTION APPROVING PETITION CCSI,-97-5, REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM TilE COASTAl. CONSTRUCTION SETBACK l.INE (CCSI,) TO Al,LOW TtiE RECONSTRUCTION OF AN EXISTING RESIDENCE I.OCATED AT I,OT 32, BI,OCK A. RE-PI,AT OF UNIT 1. CONNER'S VANDERBli,T BEAClt ESTATES, SECTION 29. TOWNSlllP 48 SOUTll, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FI,ORIDA. WllEREAS, Brctt D. Moore, P.E. ot'tlumiston & Moore Engineers, representing Richard G..'md Ncona L. Cole, requests a variance from thc Coaslal Construction Sctbacl. l.inc (CCSL), as required by the Collier County Ordinance 91-102, Division 3.13 as amemlcd, to allow {'or Ibc reconstruction o{,an existing single family residence; and WllEREAS, thc proposed project is approximately 48 feet seaward of the CCSI. attd will not be more seaward than thc existing building; and WIIEREAS. the petition is consistent with thc (.'oilier County Land Development Code. Division 3.13: and WIIEREAS, the request is consistent with Objective I 1.4 of thc Conservation and Coaslal Management Element of thc Collier County Growth Management Plan; and Wit EREAS, Ordinance 91 - 102 Section 3.9.6.6 rcqtfircs removal and maintermnce For prohibited exotic vegetation. NOW, TliEREFORE, BE IT RESOI,VED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COI,I.IER COUNTY, FI,ORIDA, that: Variance Petition CCSL-97-5 be approved subject Io the {,ollowing slipulations: 1. All proposccl improvements shall be designed in accordance with the standards of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Beaches and Shores and an approved FDF. P permit shall be obtained, and copies provided, prior 1o issuance of a Collier County Building Pem~it. 2. Construction activities shall not occur within one hundred (100) feet of the sea lurtle nesting zone, defined by Collier County I.and Development Code Division 3.10, between May I - October 31. sea turtle nesting season, withoul first submitting ami oblaining FDEP and Collier County Construction in Sea Turtle Nesting Area Permits. 3. Pctilioner shall notify ('urrcnt Planmng Environmental Staff one v,'cck prior to commencing work seaward of the (TSSI. and shall again contact Staff within one week following completion of work seaward oflhc ('('St.. 4. Outdoor lighting associated with construction, or development within three hundred (300) feet of the high title line. shall be in compliance with Division 3.10 of Ihe Collier County Land Development Code. §. Petitioner shall utilize only native coaslal dune vegetation for all required on-site landscaping beyond the 1974 Coastal Construction Control Line. · 12C 6. Minor revisions to Coastal construction Sclback I.ine Variance CCSL-97-5 ( including changes in siting aud struclurcs) may be approved, m wrlling, by Iht I'lanning ,gcrvicc.s Dircct.r or his~hcr designee. 'l~is Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DONE AND ORDERED this _._z2' ';4_. day or ~..ff_. 199~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION ERS COlAs[ER COUNTY, FLORIDA AqWEST: BY DWIG~I'F E. BROCK, Clerk ~EPUTY CI.ERK ' / ' Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney 10 5 ' - REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Ple~s~ place the following as a: XXX Normal legal Advcrtiscmcnl [] Olhcr: (Display Adv.. location, cie.) Ofigi~ling DcpV Div: Comm. D~'.Sc~'.~lanning Person ~ c~ Date: Petition No. (If none, give bncf dc~ption): SNR-gg- 1 PcOtioner: (Name ~ Ad~): ~iv Barcf~t B~ch Pro~ ~c~ As~iatJon. i ~lv Barcf~l ~ch ~I~ Sofin~. ~ 34134 Name & Address of any ~r~n(s) ~o ~ nodficd by Clerk's Office: (If ~norc space is needed, auach separate shccO H~dng ~forc ~~ BZA Olhcr N~ffs) lo ~ ~: (~mpl~e only if im~nt): ~ Napl~ Daily N~ Other ~ ~gally R~uir~ Pro~ Tc~: (lnc]~¢ ]c~ d~fiplion & ~mmon l~tion & Si~: petition N9. $~-98-I, ~ly Barcf~t ~ch Pro~ ~c~ A$~iali0n r~ucstin[ a str~l name change from "Lely Beach Boulm'ard" Iq "Barcf~t B~ch Boul~ard", l~t~ in ~ly Ba~f~t ~¢h $u~i~sion, ~hcr dc~fi~ as ~ions 5, 6, 7 & 8, T0~ship 48 ~uth, ~nRc 25 ~a~t, Collier C~nw, ~ofi~. Companion ~tilion(s). if any & pro~d boring date: D~ Pctidon Fee include advertising cost.'? ~ No If Ycs. what accounl ~hould ~ charged for advem~ing i I ~-i ~8323~M9110 Approv~ by: Dk~sion H~d Date b Counly Manager Date List Altachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: ]niti;lling~ person Io complete one coy and obtain Division Ilead approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If ]c~:al documen! is involved, be sure that an,,' necessary legal review, or request for .name, is submitted to Count',' Attorney hefore suhmittinl: to Count',' Manager. Th'e Manager's office will distribute copies: ' [] Counly Manager agenda file: to [] RcqucntinL: Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division bead lo approve and submit original to Clerk's Office. retaining a cop.,,' for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: ~ Date Of Public hcarirlg: !ii111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 TO; MS. JUl)lTl{ LOCATION'- NAPLES DALLY NEWS F2%X NO.: 263-4864 Iii111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 FROM: ELLIE HOFFMAN - MINUTES & RECORDS L- LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX NO: (813) 774-8408 PHONE 'NO: (813) 774-g406 664 665 / e2-2.3/ 15:46 | 00o01 5i / {926,34864 1~1'11 666 0,2-23 1~~o ~,~ .__,~ 9z634864 I ~!~=4BC~l.31 5 February 23, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition SNR-98-1 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, March 8, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 800551 120 § NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition SNR-98-1, Lely Barefoot Beach Property Owners Association, requesting a street name change from "Lely Beach Boulevard" to "Barefoot Beach Boulevard", located in Lely Barefoot Beach Subdivision, further described as Sections 5, 6, 7 & 8, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 12, Pages 34-37, of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida. All interested parties are invited to attend, to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board prior to the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) February 23, 1998 Mr. Fred Reischl Current Planning Community Development & Environmental Services Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34112 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition SNR-98-1 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pe~cazning to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure ~l I ii Ill I I I IIII III III I I II III II II ........ i ............... '1 5 February 23, 1998 Lely Barefoot Beach Property Owners Assoc. 1 Lely Barefoot Beach Boulevard Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition SNR-98-1 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure RESOLUTION NO. 98- RESOLUTION RENAMING LELY BEACH BOULEVARD TO "BAREFOOT BEACH BOULEVARD", WHICH STREET IS LOCATED IN LELY BAREFOOT BEACH SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN SECTIONS 5, 6, 7 & 8 , TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is authorized pursuant to authority of Chapter 336.05, Florida Statutes, to name or rename streets and roads, except for certain state roads; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has been requested to confirm the renaming of Lely Beach Boulevard to Barefoot Beach Boulevard. This street is located in Sections 5, 6, 7 & 8, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier Counts., Florida, Lely Barefoot Beach Subdivision, according ~o the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 12, Pages 34-37, of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida; WHEREAS, there appears to be no street in Collier County with this name or any similar sounding name; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for identification purposes to confirm the name of this street, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: The name of this street is hereby changed from Lely Beach Boulevard to Barefoot Beach Boulevard and is confirmed as such. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, ~!oriJa, and noted upon the maps of the street and 2cninu at!~.>s 'f i>llier 3.:un~%', ]nd notations made cn %he referenced Plat. This Sesoiut[cn adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of , 1998. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DWIGHT E. BROCK, ~ierk BARBARA B. BERRY, Chairman ApproveC as t~ ?~rm an~ Legal Sufficiency: Student Assistant County Attorney i I I I I I III IIIIII I I II I I II I I · ml I I II I Naples, FL 33940 Affidavit of Publication Naples DaiLy Ne~s NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR NG Nc~lce is hereby given q-ornmssm~ers of Colller j BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS County, wlll hold a pulollc hearing on TUESDAY, ATI'N: NAUCY SALOGUB ~q~CdrH° 24, 1998, In the PO BOX 411016 Dom, 3rd Floor, Rc~ NAPLES FL 34101-3016 mlnlstraflo~ Bulldlng, Col. Ilar County Government Center 3301 East mi Trail, No,les, Flarldo The meetln~ wfl[ begin at 9:.O0 A.AA. The ~:x~rd v~ll COe~slc~,s' REFERENCE: 001230 800551 Petition SNR-91-1 Lely Borefoof Be~:h 5765&162 HOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA Owners Association, re- questing a street nome cho~ge from "Lely BROth State of Florida Boulevord" to "Borefoat County of Collier BRoth Boulevard", Io¢ot. Before the undersigned authority, personally ~ In L:.e!v Barefoot RaDon :~AJIX31V I$ IOrlt f Ul~'~r appeared Angela Bryant, who on oath says that she scribed as Sections S, 6, 7 ~ l, Township 41 serves as Assistant Secretary of the Naples Daily ~on~e 25 East Cc~ller County, F or etd ' occor~ News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in lng to the plot ~ereof, re- Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy c_aro~.d In plot Book 12 of advertising was published in said newspaper on ~'oges 34.37, of rne oll Records of Collier dates Listed. Count~, Florida. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily All. Interested pottles are mv~ted to attend, News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said register to t~oec~ and to Collier County, Florida, and that the said submit their c~lectk~s, If newspaper has heretofore been continuously any, In writing, to ~x~'cl Drlar to the Public published in said Collier County, Florida, each hearing. A. ny person who de, cid. day and has been entered as second class mail es to a~eal a aeclslc~ of matter at the post office in Naples, in said the Board will need a re- Collier County, Florida, for a period of I year pertainlngCord of thethereto,proceedingSand next preceding the first publication of the ttmrefare~..may need attached copy of advertisement; and affiant recordertsure ofmatrne aoroceedlngsVerbatim further says that she has neither paid nor Is .~?:le_ j which record In. promised any person, firm or coporation any Cluaes me testimony and evidence u~on w.~lch the discount, rebate, commission or refund for the cq~peal ls to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY purpose of securing this advertisement for COMM~SSION£~S publication in the said newspaper. COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA BARBARA B BERRY PUBLISHED ON: 03/08 CHAIRMAN ' 'j DWIGHT E. BROCK CLERK ' By: /$/ EIlle Hoffmon, J Dep~'y Clerk j .~rAA)' No. 1163051 j AD SPACE: 65.000 INCH FILED Off: 03/09/98 ........................... )- ..... :. ......... ....... .................. ~ ~,. ,, ~ ( ~ -','/..)', (/ , , ,, Signature of Affiant .:"/ :,/' ' ' · ,/ Sworn to and Subscribed before me this ,'"~ day of ':":~ 19.~.~)-' ' ' "'; ] L~? , Personally known by me '.",", / f, · ,. ,.-,. ;'. / *** 2297430 OR: 2402 PG' 0301 *** RESOLUTION NO. 98- 88 RESOLUTION RENAHING LELY BEACH BOULEVARD TO "BAREFOOT BEACH BOULEVARD", ~HICH STREET IS LOCATED IN LELY BAREFOOT BEACH SUBDIVISION~ LOCATED IN SECTIONS 5, 6, ? & $ ~ TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~HEREAS, the Board authority o~ Chapter 336.05, Florida S~atute$, to name or rename streets and ~oad$, excep~ ~or certain sta~e roads; and ~HEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has been requested :o confirm the renamin9 of Lely Beach Boulevard ~o Barefoot Beach Boulevard. This s~ree~ is located in Sections 5, 6, ~ & $, Township 48 South, Ranqe 25 Eas:, Collier County, Florida, Lely Barefoo~ Beach Subdivision, acco~din9 ~o the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 12, Pages 34-3?, of ~he Official Records of Collier CounEy, Florida; ~HEREAS, :here appears ~o be no s~ree: in Collier County ~i:h this name or any similar $oundin9 name; and ~HEREAS, it is necessary for iden:ilicalion purposes to confirm ~he name o~ ~his s~reet, NON THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY CO~NISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: The name of this street is hereby chanqed from Lely Beach Boulevard Barefoo~ Beach Boulevard and is confirmed as such. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED ~ha: this Resolution be recorded in ~he Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and noted upon the maps of ~he s~ree: and zonin9 atlases of Collier County, and notations made on the referenced Pla:. This Resolution adopted a~ter mo:ion, second and majority vote. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COHNISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DWIGHT g. BROCK, C,~er~' Approved as to Form and Leqal ....... Nar~o~ie N. Student Ass£$tan~ County Attorney i I I II II II I I I I IIII IIIIII I III I IIIIIIIII II I I 12C Collier County, Florida REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk of the Board: Please place the following as a: / X/ Normal Legal Advertisement / [3/ Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dept/Div: Transportation/Public Works Person: Russ Muller Date: 3/12/98 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): Petition AV 96-001 Petitioner: (Name & address): See Composite Exhibit 'C" Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: See List of Adjacent Property Owners (If more space needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before: /X/BCC I /BZA I /Other Requested hearing date: March 24, 1998 Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing, Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important /X/, /X/ Naples Dally News or legally required/X/) / / Other Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common locations & size): PETITION AV 96-001 TO VACATE THE PLATS OF WIGGINS PASS LANDING UNIT NO, 1 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 44, AND WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1 ADDITION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 81, ALL OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Companion petition(s), if any, & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee Include Advertising Cost? Yes/X/ No/F-l/ If ye~, what account should be charges for advertising costs 101-163610-649100 Reviewed by: ~ Date ..~,/~.j~5 Approved by: Date Division Head Ed Ilschner County Administrator Robert F. Fernandez List Attachments: (1) Resolution (2) Legal Description (3) List of Adjacent Property Owners DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. J~L0te: If legAl_d_0j;uments is involved, be sure that any necessary_ legal review, or reauesl for same. ~_~ul~m~_t[ccLtg_gou_0.Lv_AJi<~rj:ley before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's Office will distribute copies: B. IX/ Counly Manager agenda file; /X/ Requesting Division; /X/ Original to Clerk's Office OIh~'r hearings: Initiating Division Head to approve and submit original lo Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY D~Le._~L~:~I Date Advertised Date of P.H. NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daily Naples, FL 33940 Affidavit of Publication ~D PETmOII$ State of Florida County of Collier N~lce Is hereby given ~fore the undersign~ authority, ~rsonally ap~ared c~i~r~ of Co.l~ C~, wIN hold O Public ~. T.amh , who on oath says that hearing on TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1~, In Na~es DaiS. a daily ~spa~r publish~ at Naples, in Collier Ce~, 330~ E~t Tom~ ~un~, Florida: that the attach~ ~py of the adve~ising, ~a con~ider Petition AV- Notice of P~b/ic Hearina 9~t~l, Ken~B. Cuyler, :,or. Neptune Properties, Del~ Towers UnH Nine, in the matter of Petition AV-96-0Q[ ,,c.. oeln~ Ente~rises Un~ Eleven Po~ers end A. L. Doughe~ Co.~ Inc., requesting the v~cn of was publish~ in said newspa~r ~ times in the ~e Pl~ of Wl~lns Pass Landing Unff No. 1 os re- issues sta~ing on 3/18/98 ~nd ending on3/2~/98 c~ ~. P,~ ~ ~0, Affiant fu~ says that t~ said Na~es Dai~ ~ws ,s a ~wspa~r Lo~I~ Unff No. 1 ~l- fl~ m rec¢~d In PI~ ~spa~ has ~etof~e ~ ~tJ~s~ ~is~ ~ sa~ ~ ~. ~e P~llc R~ F~a. each day a~ has ~ ~tm~ as ~ class mail ma~ at t~ IlerC~.F~l~ All I~erested ~tes ~Sl offi~ in Na~s. in sa~ ~ ~W. F~a. f~ a ~ of 1 year ~xl ~e Inv~ed to ~end, to ~i~ t~ first ~bl~t~ of t~ attac~ ~py of a~e~i~t; a~ register to affiant fu~ says that ~ has ~it~ ~ ~t ~is~ any ~r~. fi~ ~ submit ~elr c~rali~ any discounl, r~ate, c~m,ss~ or refu~ for t~ ~r~se of B~d pri~ fo ~e ~bllc S~unng this a~ertisement f~ ~all~ in the smd newspa~,, he~lng. Any per~n ~o ~cld- , ~ i es fo ~eol o declsi~ of . c~d of the preenings , pe~alnlng fher~o, and (S~gnature of Affiant) ~ref~e, e~e ~ a v~m Sworn to and subscri~ ~fore me Is m~e, reich re~d this 24 dayof Mar~h 19 qR evld~e BOARD OF COUNTY , ) COMMISSIONERS BARBARA B. BERRY, ~ (S~gnalure of notary pubhc) / CHAIR~N DWIGHT E. BROCK, , ,' CLERK -,. ~ :.. (SE F~bn'.~%' 9 2~ M~ch 18,24 No. 117~5 Personally known ~ produced identdicalion Type of Identification Produced ,,,,,, m IIIIItllllll IIII IIII I I I IIIIII II IIII IIII .... I !!i!11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 LOCATION: NAI'~S DAILY NL~S FAX NO.: 263-4864 COK~ENTS: Re: ~ !i11111111111111111111111111111111111111111'ii111111111111111111 FROM: ELLIE HOFFMAN- MINUTES & RECORDS LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX NO: (813) 774-8408 PHONE 'NO: (813) ~4 ate sent: ' Time sent: 12C March 13, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Wednesday, March 18, 1998 and one time on Monday March 23, 1998 and send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved- to this office. Sincerely, Ellie Hof fman, Deputy Clerk Encl. Acct. No. 101-163610-649100 12C 6 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998,in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition AV-96-001, Kenneth B. Cuyler, as agent for owners, Delnor-Neptune Properties, Delnor Towers Unit Nine, Inc., Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners and A. L. Dougherty Co, Inc., requesting the vacation of the Plats of Wiggins Pass Landing Unit No. 1 as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 44, and Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1 addition as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 81, all of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Ail interested parties are invited to attend, to register t.D speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board prior to the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMNISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIR/KAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) March 13, 1998 James Elkins Fairway Bldg Suite 303 1000 Tamiami Trail N Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Wednesday, March 18, 1998 and Monday, March 23, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure cc: Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Richard Yovanovich Delnor-Neptune Properties William B. Gest A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc. 12B March 13, 1998 A. L. Dougherty Co., Inc. c/o James W. Elkins, Esquire James W. Elkins, P.A. 1000 Tamiami Trail North Suite 303 Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Wednesday, March 18, 1998 and Monday, March 23, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure cc: James Elkins Richard Yovanovich Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Delnor-Neptune Properties Delnor Towers Unit Nine, Inc. 12¢ 6 March 13, 1998 Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners c/o Charles M. Wesley 7142 Kingstree Court Dublin, Ohio 43017 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Wednesday, March 18, 1998 and Monday, March 23, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure cc: James Elkins Richard Yovanovich Delnor-Neptune Properties William B. Gest A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc. 12C 6 March 13, 1998 Mr. Richard Yovanovich Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A. 850 Park Shore Drive Trianon Center, Third Floor Naples, FL 34103 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised That the above referenced petition will be considered by the 5oard of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Wednesday, March 18, 1998 and Monday, March 23, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure cc: James Elkins Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Delnor-Neptune Properties William B. Gest A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc. 12C 6 March 13, 1998 Mr. William Gest 3900 Bramford Columbus, Ohio 43220 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Wednesday, March 18, 1998 and Monday, March 23, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure cc: James Elkins Richard Yovanovich Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Delnor-Neptune Properties A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc. 120 6 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIE. COUNTY COU.THOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST RO. BOX 413044 CIRCUIT COURT NAPLES. FLORIDA 34101-3044 COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER Dwight E. Brock CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS March 13, 1998 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Wednesday, March 18, 1998 and Monday, March 23, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure !!1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 TO: LOCATION: NAPLES DALLY NEWS F~X NO.: 263-4864 Ii1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 FROM: ELLIE HOFFMAN - MINUTES & RECORDS _.~__ LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX NO: (813) 774-8408 PHONE 'NO: (813) 774-,q406 751 03-301 12:06 ~° 00' d? 9417745261 0K O~~AOO 952 03-381 12:19 ~o 01' 51 92634864 0K 068C~A16 March 30, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 33940 Re: Notice of Adoption of Resolution 98-84 Dear Judy: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Thursday, April 2, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hof fman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Purchase Order No. 800551 NOTICE OF ADOPTION Notice is hereby given that on the 24th day of March, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, adopted Resolution 98-84, re Petition AV-96-0010 pursuant to Section 177.101, Florida Statutes, Kenneth B. Cuyler, as agent for owners, Delnor-Neptune Properties, Denlor Towers Unit Nine, Inc. Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners and A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc.,requesting the vacation of the Plats of Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1 as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 44 and Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1 Addition as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 81, all of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Resolution 98-84 may be viewed in the Office of the Clerk to the Board, Minutes & Records Department, 4th Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. BOARD OF COUNTY COM/4ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA Bo BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BY: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 12g 6' ! RESOLUTION NO. 98- 2 3 RESOLUTION FOR PETITION AV 96-001 TO VACATE THE .~ PLATS OF WIGGINS PASS I.AND1NG UNIT NO. I AS ~ RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10. PAGE 44, AND WIGGINS PASS 6 LANDINGS UNIT I ADDITION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7 I0, PAGE 81, ALL OF TilE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER s COUNTY, FLORIDA. 9 I0 I~ WIIEREAS, pursuanl to Sections 177.101, Florida Slatutes, Kenneth B. Cuylcr as agent 12 for owners, Dclnor-Neptune Propcrlies, Delncr Towers Unit Nine, Inc., Dclnor Enterprises Unit 13 Eleven Partners and A.L. Doughcrty Co., Inc., docs hereby request the vacation of thc Plats of 14 Wiggins Pass Landings [)'nit No. I as recorded iT1 Plat Book I0, Page 44, anti Wiggins Pass Landings I~ Unite No.I Addition as recorded in Plat Book If), Page 81, all of Ibc Public Records of Collier 16 County, Florida; and 17 WIIEREAS, thc lloard has this day held a public hearing to consider v;,cation said plats I~ as more fully described below, and notice of said public hearing Io vacate was given as required by 19 law; anti 20 WItEREAS, the granting of the vacation will not adversely affect thc ownership of right 21 of convenient access ofothcr properly owners; anti 22 NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TIlE BOARD OF COUNTY 23 COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Ibat thc following be hereby vacated: 24 Sec Exhibit 'A' attached to and incorporated herein. 25 26 BE IT FURTIIER RESOLVED, that tile Clerk is hereby directed to advertise tire 27 adoption of dds Resolution once in a paper of general circulation in tile County within 30 days 2~ roi[owing its adoption. 29 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that thc Clerk is hereby directed to record a certified 30 copy of this Resolution, thc proof of publication of the notice of public hearing, anti the proof of 31 publication of thc notice of adoption of lhis Resolution in Ibc Public Records of Collier County, 32 Florida anti to make proper notations of this vacation on said plat. 33 This resolution adopted after motion, second anti majority vote favoring same this 34 dayof , 1998. 3~ 36 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS .~7 DWIGIIT E. BROCK. Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 38 39 By:. By: 40 DcputyClerk BARBARA B. BERRY,Chairman 41 42 43 Approved as to form and a,~ legal sufficiency: 45 } 47 H'eidi F. Asfi'ton - 4~ Assis~an! County AItorncy ~0 RM/tm/1215qT~R¢$o AY 9(~.~Jl d~: I ¢2(cX3Y' I ALL OF WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS I/NIT NO. 1 ADDITION~ ACCORDING TO THIE PLAT TI'IER/iOF I~ECXIRDED IN FLAT BOOK 10, AT PAGE 81 OF THE PUBLIC RECO~S OF COI2.IER COUNTY FLOR/DA, AND ALL OF WICtt3INS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT ~F RFX;ORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, AT PAGli 44 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIEK COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE WESI'ERLY 2~.00 FEET (WATERWAY), BEING MORE PARTICUI. ARLY D~ED AS FOLLOWS: BEGII~fl~tl~G AT TKE SOUTHF, AST CORNER OF LOT 4 OF SAID WIC~INS PASS L~q~INOS UNIT NO. 1 ADDITION; THENC~ N.I~9~$2~0'W. ALONO TEE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANC~ OF $~,9~ FEET TO TKE SO~T CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THE SAME BEING THE SOUTEF, AST CORNER OF LOT ~0, BLOCK ! OF SAE) WIGGINB PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1; THENCE N,~9°~2'20'W. ALONG THE SOnY LINE OF SAID WlOOINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1, A DISTANCE OF 1150.~$ FEET TO ~ SO~? CORNER OF BLOt~ 2, OF SA,ID WIC~INS PASS LAN~INOS UNIT NO. ~; THENC~ N,00°I4'00~, A DISTANCE OF ~971.~I FEET TOA POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF ~ WIGGINS PASS LAN~INGS UNIT NO, I; TI~N~ N. gT°4g00'E. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LI2qE, A DISTANCE OF I41~1.48 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK ~ OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1; THENCE S.02~I2'00'E. A DISTANCE OF I~.77 ~ TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCI( ~ OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LA.h~INGS UNIT NO. 1; THENCE N.S'7*4S'~E. A DISTANCE OF 200.00 F~'~.T TO THE NORTHF. AS? CORNER OF 5AID LOT 1; ~C~ S,02°12~X~'Ii ALONO THE EAS~Y LINE OF SAID W1GGINS PASS LANDINOS UNIT NO. 1, A DISTANCE OF ~&l~ FEET TO TH~ SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BIX)CK 1 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. ~, TH~ SA,M2E BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. ! ADDITION; ~CE S.02° 12'00'~. ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF S~ ~ WIGGINS PA.~ LANDINGS UN1T NO. 1 ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF ~209.93 FEET TO TH~ POII~ OF BEGII~glNG, PARCF~ CONTAINS 7S.28 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ,[,m[[ ,fn,,[ -'[[[[] [IIll Ill Illllll[ll Il llll Illll ............ [[[[ [[ [[[[[ [ Illll[ ] Y' c "' d l% H-.l'l:lt4,.l 4.199B ~ ~ :~: ~Zi:~ l: R.n (ROEiTZKL~,gINI)tT~S)BAII~ON 1 ~J ~,.,q, ~t n ;qm.. d' ¢ ~.1~ P, EXHIBIT "A" 2of 6 B~GS ~ TO ~~S P~S ~~O$ ~ NO. 1 ~D~ON. ACCO~G TO ~ ~T ~F ~O~ ~ P~T B~K 10, AT PAGE 81 OF ~ P~LIC ~ P~P~ ~ S~ TO ~$~, ~S~VA~ONS, O~ ~~ONS 0~~~. (SEE ATTACHED SKETCH) '.2 ~ DF.,SC~ ~ON ALL OF WIGGINS PA.SS LANDINGS UNIT NO, 1 ADDITION. ACCOKDING TO ~ PLAT ~OF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, AT PAGE 81 OF THE PUBLIC KECORDS OF CO~ COUNTY FLOR~A, AND A!-L OF WIC,~INS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1, ACCOP, DING TO ~ PLAT THERF~F P, ECOKDt~ IN PLAT BOOK 10, AT PAG~ 44 ~ PUBMC RECORDS OF COLt,IE~ COUNTY, FLORIDA, IF. SS AND EXCEPt ~VF. STEIIL¥/S0.00 FF, ET 07gA~IAY), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DF, SCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN~L'WG AT THE SOUTHEAST COKNEg OF LOT 4 OF SAD WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1 ADDITION; THENC~ N. Sg°$220"W. ALONG THE SODTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 599.96 FEET TO THE SO~T COKN]SK OF SAID LOT 4, ~ SAM~ BSING TH]~ SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I0, BLOCK 1 OF SAtD WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1; THA%qCE N. tg~52~20"W. ALONG THE SO~¥ LINE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. I, A DISTANCE OF 11~0.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHW~T CORN5~ OF BLOCK 2, OF SAID WI~$ PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1; IIIENCE N.00°14'00"W. A DISTANCE OF 1971.91 FEET TO A POI/qT ON TH5 NORTHERLY ~ OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. I; THENCE N.87~4ff00"F_~ ALONG SAID NOP, THERLY LINF~ A DISTANCE OF 14g!.48 FEET TO TI{Ii NORTHF~ST COKNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK 3 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. I; THENCE S.02°12~0"F, A DISTANCE OF 163.T; FEET TO THE NOR~T COgNER Ot~ LOT I, BLOCK 3 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNTr l~'O. 1; THENCE N. gT~4~90"F_ A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FL~T TO THE NORTHEAST COKNEI{ OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE S.02~I2'00"E. ALONG THE EASIEKLY LINE OF SAID W/GGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1, A DISTANCE OF 66& 16 FIgET TO THE SOU//qEAST CORNER OF LOT I, BLOCK I O1~ SAID WICK}INS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1, THE SAME BEING THE NORTHEAST COKNER OF LOT 1 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. ! ADDITION; ~CE S.02°12~)0~E. ALONG THE EASTERLY LI1N'E OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIt NO. 1 ADDITION, A DISTANCE (IF 1209.93 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIIN~G, PARCEL CONTAINS ?gR~ ACl~S, MOPE OK LESS. 1 BF. AR~C~ REFER. TO WIC~IN$ PASS LAND]NOS UNIT NO. 1 ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PI.AT THERF~F RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, AT PA~E 81 OF TIlE PUBLIC RE(~RDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECt TO EASElvI~IT~, RESERVATIONS, OR RF.S'I~crlONS OF RECOKD. (s~ ^TTAC~__ ..r) SKS'rc'~ 2 · ".'.'"',',~' ' .. ' .. " C '"' '" 4,' I' I ; I I' .. ." .: '. · ~ · ~ · %'-.; ~ ', '....:: ' l: [ . :......; . ~. .; ~, · .,: ~! . · ..' · ;~ " ':' ...;. ., .r [, ,_._.--.,---.------. ...-. ," ',;.. il " ~"!: ~ ': .'.'. ;:.'. . .. · ,. '..';~ · ·; "· '~"'" ~ I~it~ ............. '"' '"" ;1 ~,-~! ,,,., ~.~.-.- . 2,[',....'~ . · .. ;.~:::. :...,. It 'il "' " ;,".'.?',' ~ I ,...; ~.. ~ ..: : .~. :,.:: . , ~ · .... " ~' · ~. ~.~ .' · ""'" g.P'l ,-.:,.'! ;.~:: , . :,~ f~ - i~ itl .,.'.:'.'. · ~:~.! ·~ ~.- :'"" :~ '~ ''[ '.:.'..', , ' ,.., ,,.~]i,. ~ i' · .. I'~. ,~1._., ABUTTING AND OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET OF PLATS 1. Vanderbilt Bay Landings Associates, Ltd. P.O. Box 10580 Naples, Florida 34101 2. Naples Memorial Gardens, Inc. 586 lllth Avenue N Naples, Florida 34108 3. Mauro LaGrasta and Anna LaGrasta 496 Flamingo Avenue Naples, Florida 34108 4. Collier Development Corporation Everglades, Florida 5. Teresa Olivier and Genevieve Zanetti 897 Vine Street Sudbury, Ontario, Canada 6. VL Pelot, Inc. 11040 Vanderbilt Drive Naples, Florida 34108 7. Collier County Collier County Courthouse 3301 Tamiami Trail E Naples, Florida 34112 8. Gulf Shore Lake Villas, Inc. 2063 Trade Center Way Naples, Florida 34109 74854_1 .WP5 Composite Exh/bit "A" 12C 6 , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................. * Owner :LIDRBAUCH NORMAN J Folio #:79807500103 CoOwner :KAREN S KNEZEVICH Strap #:153254 1053A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #105 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :8418 GLENEAGLES CT DUBLIN OH 43017 Struct :$74,200 Xfered :04/30/90 Doc #:1524-1585 Agric : Price :$99,000 Deed : Total :$74,200 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : 'Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #105OR Millage:14.7594 :1524 PG 1585 1995 Tx:$1,095.15 -- Phone : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building. Sq Ft , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :CARROLL BARBARA J Folio #:79807500129 CoOwner : Strap #:153254 1063A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #106 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :6334 NEW LONDON DR COLUMBUS OH 43231 Struct :$74,200 Xfered :04/30/90 Doc #:1524-1594 Agric Price :$99,000 Deed : Total :$74,200 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #106 Millage:14.7594 : 1995 Tx:$1,095.15 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. · .......................... : Netro$¢a~/Collie~ : ............................ * Owner :KAARBO TODD A CARMELLA Folio #:79807500145 CoOwner :DAVID;CAROL JOUPPI Strap #:153254 1073A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #107 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :7901 CHESSHIRE CT MAPLE GROVE MN 55311 Struct :$74,200 Xfered :10/23/95 Doc #:2111-1412 Agric : Price : Deed :AGREEMENT Total :$74,200 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :V~;DERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #107 Millage:14.7594 : 1995 Tx:$1,095.15 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner :612-494-3013 Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: BUilding:sq'Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :PAYTON ROBERT C/MARY A Folio #:79807500161 CoOwner : Strap #:153254 1083A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #108 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :PO BOX 10819 BONITA SPRINGS FL 33929 Struct :$76,500 Xfered :06/25/96 Doc #:2198-1697 Agric : Price :$82,500 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$76,500 Loan Amt:$66,000 Loan :CONVENTIONAL %Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED pERSONS IntTy:FIXED % Owned:100 Lender :WATERFORD MTG Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #108OR Millage:14.7594 :1834 PG 945 1995 Tx:$1,129.08 : -- Phone -- Sub/Pla~:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. · . _ ..... _ ...... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * ...... - ..... Folio #:79807500488 Owner :SERAFIN STANLEY & LUCILLE Strap #:153254 2013A21 CoOwner : Land : Site :509 ROMA CT ~201 NAPLES 33963 Mail :5530 S CHRISTIANA AVE CHICAGO IL 60629 Struct :$80,325 Xfered :05/18/89 Doc ~:1441-2157 Agric : Total :$80,325 Price :$116,400 Deed : %Imprvd:100 Loan Amt: Loan : % Owned: VestType: IntTy: Exempt : Lender : Amount : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #201OR Millage:14.7594 :1441 PG 2157 1995 Tx:$1,185.56 -- Phone -- : Owner : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres Lot Sq Pt . _ ....... , , ........................... MetroScan/Collier ..................... Folio #:79807500501 Owner :CAMILLERI LILLIAN Strap #:153254 2023A21 CoOwner : Site :509 ROMA CT ~202 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :12 NEWPORT ST BRAMALEA CANADA Struct :$78,025 Xfered :08/08/94 Doc ~:1974-0575 Agric : Price :$100 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$78,025 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 % Owned:100 VestType: IntTy: Exempt Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #202OR Millage:14.7594 :1974 PG 575 1995 Tx:$1,151.60 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ................... 12C___&.' Owner :NEEDHAM ROBERT J & RITA A Folio #:79807500527 CoOwner :CARL;JANE S MYERS Strap #:153254 2033A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #203 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :8144 VIOLA ST SPRINGFIELD VA 22152 Struct :$78,025 Xfered :01/10/90 Doc #:1497-0772 Agric : Price :$102,000 Deed : Total :$78,025 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #203OR Millage:14.7594 :1497 PG 772 1995 Tx:$1,151.60 : -- Phone -- Sub/Pla~:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 .................... Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: ~i * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :IMBRIANO TR ERNESTO Folio #:79807500543 CoOwner : Strap #:153254 2043A21 Site :509 ROMA CT ~204 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :509 ROMA CT ~204 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$78,025 Xfered :01/26/90 Doc ~:1500-2124 Agric : Price :$101,000 Deed : Total :$78,025 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #204OR Millage:14.7594 :1500 PG 2124 1995 Tx:$782.61 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12C 6 , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :LINDA BAKER INV INC Folio #:79807500569 Strap ~:153254 2053A21 CoOwner : Site :509 ROMA CT ~205 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :411 SIMCOE ST N OSHAWA CANADA Struct :$78,025 Xfered :06/18/90 Doc ~:1537-1010 Agric : Price :$103,000 Deed : Total :$78,025 Loan Ami: Loan : %Imprvd:100 % Owned: VestType: IntTy: Exempt : Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~205 Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$1,151.60 : -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :IMBRIANO ERNESTO Folio #:79807500585 CoOwner : Strap ~:153254 2063A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #206 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :509 ROMA CT #206 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$78,025 Xfered :04/09/93 Doc #:1814-0820 Agric : Price :$88,500 Deed :WARR3~NTY Total :$78,025 Loan Amt:$40,000 Loan :CONVENTIONAL %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy:FIXED % Owned:100 Lender :PRIVATE Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #206OR Millage:14.7594 :1814 PG 820 1995 Tx:$1,151.60 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12g 6 Owner :MORIARTY MAURICg F & BARBARA Folio #:79807500608 CoOwner : Strap #:153254 2073A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #207 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :7626 MARINER PT MAPLE GROVE MN 55311 Struct :$78,025 Xfered :12/14/93 Doc #:1894-0542 Agric : Price :$79,000 Deed :SPECIAL WARRANTY Total :$78,025 Loan Amt:$59,200 Loan :CONVENTIONAL %Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy:VARIABLE % Owned:100 Lender :HOME SVGS AMER Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~207OR Millage:14.7594 :1894 PG 542 1995 Tx:$1,151.60 -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner :612-420-4805 Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sg Ft: Sg Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :ANDREOULAKIS CHRIS & LUZ M Folio #:79807500624 CoOwner : Strap #:153254 2083A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #208 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :6081 18TH AVE NW NAPLES FL 33999 Struct :$80,325 Xfered :05/01/89 Doc #:1437-0214 Agric : Price :$105,000 Deed : Total :$80,325 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~208OR Millage:14.7594 :1437 PG 214 1995 Tx:$1,185.56 -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner :941-598-2103 Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. , ............ -: MetroScan/Collier : ............................ Owner :RINALDI CARL J & JEAN C Folio ~:79807500022 CoOwner : Strap #:153254 1013A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #101 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :509 ROMA CT #101 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$76,500 Xfered :06/29/90 Doc ~:1541-0169 Agric : Price :$102,500 Deed : Total :$76,500 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM ~i Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #1010R Millage:14.7594 :1541 PG 169 1995 Tx:$760.12 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :RISMAN STANLEY & EDYTHE J Folio #:79807500048 CoOwner : Strap #:153254 1023A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #102 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :509 ROMA CT ~102 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$74,200 Xfered :11/19/91 Doc #:1664-0768 Agric : Price :$82,000 Deed : Total :$74,200 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #102OR Millage:14.7594 :1664 PG 768 1995 Tx:$1,095.15 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. , ...... : MetrosCan/Collier : ............................ , Owner :STANTON ROBERT A & MARGARET L Folio #:79807500064 CoOwner : Strap #:153254 1033A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #103 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :509 ROMA CT #103 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$74,200 Xfered :03/02/90 Doc #:1509-1375 Agric : Price :$100,000 Deed : Total :$74,200 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~1030R Millage:14.7594 :1509 PG 1375 1995 Tx:$726.15 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Fi: Building Sq Ft: * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :GRAVINA THOMAS J & NANCY B Folio #:79807500080 CoOwner :JOSEPH C Strap #:153254 1043A21 Site :509 ROMA CT #104 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :26 RIDGE RD ROSELAND NJ 07068 Struct :$74,200 Xfered :10/31/95 Doc #:2114-0610 Agric : Price :$85,000 Deed :SPECIAL WARRANTY Total :$74,200 Loan Amt:$68,000 Loan :CONVENTIONAL %Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy:FIXED % Owned:i00 Lender :AFI MTG Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #104 Millage:14.7594 : 1995 Tx:$1,095.15 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Owner : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 6 , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ........... Owner :MAC ARTHUR EARL W A JOYCE A Folio #:79395000021 Strap #:152450 A 1013A29 CoOwner : Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #101 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :PO BOX 168 MORRISTOWN NY 13664 Struct :$172,975 Xfered :05/08/9~ Doc #:1614-0571 Agric : Price :$149,900 Deed : Total :$172,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 % Owned: VestType: IntTy: Exempt : Lender : Amount : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-101 OR 1614 PG 571 1995 Tx:$2,518.72 -- Phone -- : Owner : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-5993 R:25E T:48S S:29 .......... Building Sq Lot Acres: ..... * , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ........................ Owner :SATTAN JR WILLIAM E Folio #:79395000047 CoOwner :PATRICIA G SATTAN Strap #:152450 A 1023A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #102 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :28 QUINCE PL NORTH BRUNSWICK NJ 08902 Struct :$154,275 Xfered :07/06/90 Doc #:1542-1489 Agric : Price :$152,000 Deed : Total :$154,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 % Owned: VestType: IntTy: Exempt : Lender : Amount : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINION Millage:14.5612 :A-102 OR 1542 PG 1489 1995 Tx:$2,246.42 -- Phone : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 .......... Building Sq Ft: Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12g * .......................... : ~etro$¢a~/Co11±er : ............................ * Owner :LEAC~ ROBERT M A MARJORIE S Folio ~:79395000063 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 A 1033A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR ~103 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :1118 GULF SHORE BLVD N NAPLES FL 33940 Struct :$154,275 Xfered :05/06/94 Doc #:1944-1227 Agric : Price :$190,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$154,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType:MAP,RIED PERSONS IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIb~ Millage:14.5612 :A-103 OR 1944 PG 1227 1995 Tx:$2,246.42 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566.-7993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * ........................... MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :LEACH MARJORIE S Folio #:79395000089 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 1043A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #104 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11118 GULFSHORE DR #104A NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$172,975 Xfered :06/03/91 Doc #:1620-1383 Agric : Price :$172,900 Deed : Total :$172,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-104 OR 1620 PG 1383 1995 Tx:$2,154.71 -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner :941-566-3683 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :MENSCH MARY K Folio #:79395000102 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 2013A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #201 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :PO BOX 310 CALVERTON NY 11933 Struct :$173,975 Xfered :04/29/96 Doc #:2176-0227 Agric : Price :$199,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$173,975 Loan Amt:$180,000 Loan :SELLER %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy:FIXED % Owned:100 Lender :SELLER Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-201 OR 1626 PG 674 1995 Tx:$2,533.29 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 .................... Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: · ..................... -----: MetroScan/Collier · ............................. * Owner :CENNERAZZO JOHN L & EILEEN Folio #:79395000128 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 2023A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #202 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :9 WEBSTER ST WOBURN MA 01801 Struct :$155,275 Xfered :06/25/90 Doc #:1539-1162 Agric : Price :$139,000 Deed : Total :$155,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-202 OR 1539 PG 1162 1995 Tx:$2,260.99 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12G ........... ~i~' ...... : MetroScan/Collier : * ~wner :VENOOKER IS & LOIS Folio #:79395000144 CoOwner ~' Strap #:152450 A 2033A29 Site 111118 GUL~HORE DR #203 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :102 COWEESET DR BROCKTON MA 02401 Struct :$155,275 Xfered :07/23/90 Doc #:1545-2264 Agric : Price :$144,000 Deed : Total :$155,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-203 OR 1545 PG 2264 1995 Tx:$2,260.99 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :CARDINALE FINA Folio #:79395000160 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 2043A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #204 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11118 GULFSHORE DR #204A NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$173,975 Xfered :10/19/90 Doc #:1566-1912 Agric : Price :$189,000 Deed : Total :$173,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-204 OR 1566 PG 1912 1995 Tx:$2,169.27 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 1 C 6 ' ~ MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :RUSCHKE HERBERT G & THERESE Folio ~:79395000186 CoOwner : .~ Strap ~:152450 A 3013A29 Site 11118 Gu~ ~HORE DR #301 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :1865 N H~ ~TED ST CHICAGO IL 60614 Struct :$174,975 Xfered :06/12/91 Doc #:1623-1246 Agric : Price :$219,900 Deed : Total :$174,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 REs,CoNDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-301 OR7623 PG 1246 1995 Tx:$2,547.85 : ~ -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: , ........................... MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :ENGLER GEORGE F & ELEANOR J Folio #:79395000209 ~!~ Strap #:152450 A 3023A29 CoOwner : Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #302 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :5289 ROBERTS RD HAMBURG NY 14075 Struct :$156,275 Xfered :10/01/90~ Doc #:1562-0979 Agric : Price : Deed : Total :$156,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: · IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-302 OR 1562 PG 979 1995 Tx:$2,275.55 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :KELL JOSEPH S/JEANNE M Folio #:79395000225 CoOwner : i~ Strap #:152450 A 3033A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #303 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :1670 WILD,RIDGE CT S NEWPORT MN 55055 Struct :$156,275 ~:i Doc #:2135-0342 Agric : Xfered :01/04/96 ~ Price :$230,000 ~ Deed :WARRANTY Total :$156,275 Loan Amt:$207,000 ~ Loan :CONVENTIONAL %Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy:VARIABLE % Owned:100 Lender :CITICORP MTG Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-303 OR 1539 PG 514 1995 Tx:$2,275.55 : ~ -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner :612-459-7694 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :MITZELFELD TR JULIE A Folio #:79395000241 CoOwner :ITF JULIE A MITZELFE Strap #:152450 A 3043A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR ~304 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :2628 LAMBETH PARK ROCHESTER HILLS MI 48306 Struct :$174,975 Xfered :01/05/95 . Doc #:2018-0468 Agric : Price :$100 Deed :QUIT CLAIM Total :$174,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:i00 VestType: ~ IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-304 OR 2018 PG 0468 1995 Tx:$2,547.85 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12C ~ n/Collier , .......................... : MetroSca ............................ Owner :LATIMER TR RUBEN EUGENE Folio #:79395000267 CoOwner :ITF REUBEN EUGENE LA Strap #:152450 A 4013A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #401 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :321 CHATELAINE CT WILLOWBROOK IL 60514 Struct :$175,975 Xfered :12/29/94 ~ Doc #:2015-2156 Agric : Price : ~ Deed :QUIT CLAIM Total :$175,975 Loan Amt: ? Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-401 OR 2015 PG 2156 1995 Tx:$2,562.40 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 .................... Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :MYHELIC STEVE M & SUSAN M ET AL Folio #:79395000283 CoOwner :BOB W Strap #:152450 A 4023A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #402 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :9205 S 85TH CT HICKORY HILLS IL 60457 Struct :$157,275 Xfered :06/26/90 Doc #:1539-1950 Agric Price :$161,000 .Deed : Total :$157,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-402 OR 1539 PG 1950 1995 Tx:$2,290.11 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12C 6 · . '- ....... : MetroSca:/Colller : ............................ * Owner :848757 ONTARIO INC Folio ~:79395000306 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 4033429 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #403 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :3142 MAYFIELD ROAD SNELLGROVE C CANADA Struct :$157,275 Xfered :07/03/90 Doc #:1542-0020 Agric : Price :$156,000 ~i. Deed : Total :$157,275 Loan Amt: ~ Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: :~i IntTy: % Owned: ~ Exempt : Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-403 OR 1542 PG 20 1995 Tx:$2,290.11 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: · ........................... MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :JIORLE BRUCE J & MARY ANN Folio #:79395000322 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 4043429 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #404 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :59 COUNTRY ACRES DR HAMPTON NJ 08827 Struct :$175,975 Xfered :07/18/90 Doc #:1545-0014 Agric : Price :$180,000 Deed : Total :$].75,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-404 OR 1545 PG 14 1995 Tx:$2,562.40 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The InformatiOn Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :HALL TR DOUGLAS J Folio #:79395000348 CoOwner :ITF CAROLE~T HALL Strap #:152450 A 5013A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #501 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :5263 KINGS~GATE WAY BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48302ruct :$176,975 Xfered :11/09/92 Doc #:1769-0258 Agric : Price : Deed : Total :$176,975 Loan Amt: i!i Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: ~. IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-501 OR 1769 PG 258 1995 Tx:$2,576.98 ~ -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT{ LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102[~'01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building. Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :KEY LLOYD M & JACQUELINE A Folio #:79395000364 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 5023A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #502 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11118 GULFSHORE DR #502A NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$158,275 Xfered :06/25/90 Doc #:1539-1180 Agric : Price :$181,000 Deed : Total :$158,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: ~ IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-502 OR 1539 PG 1180 1995 Tx:$1,940.64 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. -IIIIIII I IIIIIIIII IIIIIII I III I III II .............. 12C , ........................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ Owner :847240 ON?ARIO LIMITED Folio #:?9395000380 CoOwner : Strap ff:152450 A 5033429 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #503 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :3 LINDHURST STREET BRAMPTON CANADA Struct :$158,275 Xfered :07/10/90 Doc #:1543-0549 Agric Price :$159,000 Deed : Total :$158,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-503 OR 1543 PG 549 1995 Tx:$2,304.68 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ Owner :MANN KARNIG & SHERRI Folio #:79395000403 CoOwner :CHARLES;ALYCE MANN Strap #:152450 A 5043A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #504 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :389 WOODLAWN RD W GUELPH CANADA Struct :$176,975 Xfered :03/06/91 Doc #:1600-2060 Agric : Price : Deed : Total :$176,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-504 OR 1600 PG 2060 1995 Tx:$2,576.98 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. , .......................... : MetroScan/Oollier : ............................ * Owner :YUP & COMING ASSOCIATES Folio ~:79395000429 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 6013A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR ~601 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :2838 EATON RD SHAKER HEIGHTS OH 44122 Struct :$177,975 Xfered :07/03/90 Doc #:1542-0063 Agric : Price :$180,000 Deed : Total :$177,97~ Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-601 OR 1542 PG 63 1995 Tx:$2,591.54 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier .............................. * Owner :DE FILLIPPO STEPHEN A Folio ~:79395000445 CoOwner :JEAN T DE FILLIPPO Strap ~:152450 A 6023A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #602 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11118 GULFSHORE DR ~602A NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$159,275 Xfered :06/20/90 Doc #:1538-0457 Agric : Price :$166,000 Deed : Total :$159,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-602 OR 1538 PG 457 1995 Tx:$1,955.20 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 1 2C 6 * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :MURAWSKY THOMAS D & GISELE Folio #:79395000461 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 A 6033A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR ~603 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :363 POMMELGATE CR WATERLOO CANADA Struct :$159,275 Xfered :06/29/90 Doc #:1541-0235 Agric : Price :$164,000 Deed : Total :$159,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-603 OR 1541 PG 235 1995 Tx:$2,319.23 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :ORRICO-HOLZINGER BARBARA Folio ~:79395000487 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 6043A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #604 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :280 PROSPECT AVE HACKENSACK NJ 07601 Struct :$177,975 Xfered :06/29/90 Doc #:1541-0224 Agric : Price :$189,000 Deed : Total :$177,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:109 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-604 OR 1541 PG 224 1995 Tx:$2,591.54 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. I2C , .......................... : MetroScan/Coliier ............................. * O~r~er :NEOM~ M R~BEL ~olio #:79395000500 CoOwner :NEOMA M RUEBEL TR Strap #:152450 A 7013A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #701 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :2888 BANCROFT RD FAIRLAWN OH 44333 Struct :$178,975 Xfered :03/04/96 Doc #:2154-1301 Agric : Price : Deed :QUIT CLAIM Total :$178,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 % Owned:100 VestType: IntTy: Exempt : Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-701 OR 2061 PG 0335 1995 Tx:$2,242.06 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building'Sq Ft: , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :ROBINSON CRAIG R & KAY E Folio ~:79395000526 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 A 7023A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #702 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :13932 LAKE POINTE DR DES MOINES IA 50325 Struct :$160,275 Xfered :02/28/94 Doc #:1918-1568 Agric : Price :$250,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$160,275 Loan Amt: Loan :SELLER %Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:J4.5612 :A-702 OR 1918 PG 1568 1995 Tx:$2,333.78 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12C , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :LACCI JOHN V & LISA M ET AL Folio #:79395000542 CoOwner :JOSEPH M Strap #:152450 A 7033A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #703 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :119 LESLIE AVE WEST LAFAYETTE IN 47906 Struct :$160,275 Xfered :07/03/90 Doc #:1542-0032 Agric : Price :$169,000 Deed : Total :$160,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-703 OR 1542 PG 32 1995 Tx:$2,333.78 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :KUSHNER GARRY WILLIAM/BONNIE I Folio #:79395000568 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 7043A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #704 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :755 CONFEDERATION DR THUNDER BAY CANADA Struct :$178,975 Xfered :11/15/94 Doc #:2002-1547 Agric : Price :$100 Deed :QUIT CLAIM Total :$178,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd 100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-704 OR 1665 PG 605 1995 Tx:$2,606.10 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier Owner :DES ROBERTS CECILIA A TRUSTEE Folio ~:79395000584 CoOwner :CECILIA A DES ROBERT Strap ~:152450 A 8013A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #801 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :565 DOVENTRY LN GROSSE POINTE WOODS MI 48236truct :$179,975 Xfered :03/07/96 Doc ~:2156-0212 M Agric : Price : Deed :QUIT CLAIM Total :$179,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType:TRUST\TRUSTEE IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-801 OR 1640 PG 1823 1995 Tx:$2,620.66 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LA/gDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: , ........................... MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :WILLIAMS HOWARD R & DOROTHY B Folio #:79395000607 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 8023A29 Site :11118 GtrLFSHORE DR #802 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11118 GULFSHORE DR #802 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$161,275 Xfered :08/16/90 Doc ~:1551-1889 Agric : Price :$191,000 Deed : Total :$161,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VAigDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:f4.5612 :A-802 OR 1551 PG 1889 1995 Tx:$1,984.34 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner :941-591-4922 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :WOJNOWICH PAUL S & SANDRA R Folio #:79395000623 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 8033A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #803 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :8027 WINDJAMMER DR FORT MILL SC 29715 Struct :$161,275 Xfered :07/12/90 Doc #:1543-2276 Agric : Price :$188,000 Deed : Total :$161,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIb~ Millage:14.5612 :A-803 OR 1543 PG 2276 1995 Tx:$2,348.34 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :PAQUETTE GERALD R & DEBORAH J Folio #:79395000649 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 8043A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #804 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :100 RD TIMMINS WATERLOO CANADA Struct :$179,975 Xfered :01/03/92 Doc #:1676-0139 Agric Price :$267,500 Deed : Total :$i79,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-804 OR 1676 PG 139 1995 Tx:$2,620.66 : -- Phone Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 120 6 . .......................... : MetroScam/Collier ............................. * Owner :LIuNIG RELAX CO Folio ~:79395000665 Strap ~:152450 A 9013A29 CoOwner : Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #901 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :10611 TAMIAMI TRL N NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$180,975 Xfered :03/29/96 Doc ~:2164-0832 Agric Price :$295,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$180,975 Loan Amt:$206,500 Loan :CONVENTIONAL %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy:VARIABLE % Owned:100 Lender :GULF COAST NATL BK Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :V~DERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-901 OR 1592 PG 1087 1995 Tx:$2,635.20 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq , ........................... MetroScan/Cotlier ............................. Owner :ALONSO JOSEFINA GARRIDO Folio #:79395000681 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 A 9023A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR ~902 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :MIR~ EMBASSY #905 SANTURCE PR 00907 Struct :$162,275 Xfered :06/20/90 Doc ~:1538-0454 Agric Price :$189,000 Deed : Total :$152,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-902 OR 1538 PG 454 1995 Tx:$2,362.91 -- Phone : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-566-3993 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: uilding Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ...... , ~ ii tilt iii,re, tirol - II - I IIIIII '1 I II I I I 12B 6 * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :BRUNN GEORGE R & PHYLLIS E Folio ~:79395000704 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 A 9033A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #903 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11118 GULFSHORE DR ~903A NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$162,275 Xfered :10/06/95 Doc ~:2107-0001 Agric : Price :$250,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$162,275 Loan Amt:$200,000 Loan :CONVENTIONAL %Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy:D~JUSTABLE % Owned:100 Lender :HOME SVGS AMER Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.56i2 :A-903 1995 Tx:$1,998.89 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :RAMSAY JACK T & JEAN D Folio #:79395000720 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 A 9043A29 Site :11118 GULFSHORE DR #904 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11118 GULFSHORE DR #904 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$180,975 Xfered :01/20/93 Doc #:1789-0996 Agric : Price :$290,000 Deed : Total :$180,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :A-904 OR 1789 PG 996 1995 Tx:$2,635.20 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Sq Ft: BUilding'sq'Ft: Lot Acres: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ,, [ [[[ [ I ....................... Ill fill Ill 120 6 , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier' ' ............................ * Owner :LAUFMAN DANIEL L & DEBRJ% A Folio #:79395000762 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 1013A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~101 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :469 GREENMONT DR CANFIELD OH 44406 Struct :$172,975 Xfered :05/07/91 Doc ~:1613-1244 Agric : Price :$164,900 Deed : Total :$172,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-101 OR 1613 PG 1244 1995 Tx:$2,518.72 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :WILSON LARRY A & JANICE L Folio #:79395000788 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 1023A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~102 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :1205 HUNTERS RUN VICTOR NY 14564 Struct :$154,275 Xfered :12/19/90 Doc #:1579-2368 Agric : Price :$163,000 Deed : Total :$154,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-102 OR 1579 PG 2368 1995 Tx:$2,246.42 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block i Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Ncr Guaranteed. 12C 6 ~ .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : Owner :HOFF EDWARD W & KATHRYN R Folio #:79395000801 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 1033A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #103 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11116 GULFSHORE DR #103 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$154,275 Xfered :08/12/91 Doc #:1639-0083 Agric : Price :$166,000 Deed : Total :$154,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIb~ Millage:14.5612 :B-103 OR 1639 PG 83 1995 Tx:$1,882.40 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * ........................... MetroScan/Collier : ............................ Owner :ELPERS MARJORIE L Folio #:79395000827 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 1043A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #104 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :83' BEAUVOIR CIR ANDERSON IN 46011 Struct :$172,975 Xfered :03/29/91 Doc #:1602-2084 Agric : Price :$184,900 Deed : Total :$].72,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-104 OR 1602 PG 2084 1995 Tx:$2,518.72 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan/Collier : Owner :PARKER ROBERT J & MARILYN B Folio #:79395000843 Strap ~:152450 B 2013A29 CoOwner : Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #201 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :4108 ROYAL FOX DR SAINT CHARLES IL 60174 Struct :$173,975 Xfered :05/22/91 Doc #:1617-1907 Agric : Price :$174,000 Deed : Total :$173,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 % Owned: VestType: IntTy: Exempt : Lender : Amount : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-201 OR 1617 PG 1907 1995 Tx:$2,533.29 -- Phone : Owner : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 .......... Lot Acres: ........ . .......................... : MetroScan/Collier Owner :DEMPSEY DAWN L & ANTHONY J Folio #:79395000869 Strap ~:152450 B 2023A29 CoOwner :. Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #202 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :7409 GLEASON RD EDINA MN 55439 Struct :$155,275 Xfered :01/21/94 Doc #:1906-1966 Agric Price :$210,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$155,275 Loan Amt:$168,000 Loan :CONVENTIONAL %Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntT¥:VARIABLE % Owned:100 Lender :HOME SVGS AMER Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:f4.5612 :B-202 OR 1906 PG 1966 1995 Tx:$2,260.99 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner :612-942-7179 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. IIIIIlllllll II II I I II ............... * ........................... MetroScan/Collier : ............................ Owner :BENEZETTE ROBERT A & VIVIAN E Folio ~:79395000885 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 2033A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #203 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :PO BOX 9079 NAPLES FL 33941 Struct :$155,275 Xfered :12/04/90 Doc ~:1576-0133 Agric : Price :$168,000 Deed : Total :$155,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-203 OR 1576 PG 133 1995 Tx:$1,896.95 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner :813-835-3393 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:485 S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ Owner :VANDENBERG CARL R & JEAN E Folio #:79395000908 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 2043A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #204 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :6730 174TH ST TINLEY PARK IL 60477 Struct :$173,975 Xfered :08/02/91 Doc #:1636-2177 Agric : Price :$207,000 Deed : Total :$1.73,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- M!NIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-204 OR 1636 PG 2177 1995 Tx:$2,533.29 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:485 S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. .................... , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier Owner :EDWARDS SR WILLIAM V & FANN Folio ~:79395000924 Strap ~:152450 B 3013A29 CoOwner : Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~301 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :15112 CHESTNUT LN OAK FOREST IL 60452 Struct :$174,975 Xfered :04/29/91 Doc ~:1611-1129 Agric : Price :$204,900 Deed : Total :$174,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:!4.5612 :B-301 OR 1611 PG 1129 1995 Tx:$2,547.85 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building' Sq Ft: , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :SATTAN JR WILLIAM E Folio ~:79395000940 CoOwner :PATRICIA G SATTAN Strap #:152450 B 3023A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #302 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :28 QUINCE PL NEW BRUNSWICK NJ 08902 Struct :$156,275 Xfered :12/17/90 Doc ~:1579-0518 Agric Price :$172,000 Deed : Total :$156,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:l,~.5612 :B-302 OR 1579 PG 518 1995 Tx:$2,275.55 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 6 ~ .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :RIVERA TR JOHN Folio #:79395000966 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 3033A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~303 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :822 REVERE CT WESTMONT IL 60559 Struct :$156,275 Xfered :03/10/93 Doc ~:1803-1927 Agric : Price :$100 Deed :QUIT CLAIM Total :$156,275 Loan Amt: Loan :SELLER %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-303 OR 1803 PG 1927 1995 Tx:$2,275.55 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :VENONSKY JOHN P & LAURA T Folio ~:79395000982 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 3043A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #304 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :193 HOLSTEIN RD KING OF PRUSSIA PA 19406 Struct :$174,975 Xfered :01/07/91 Doc #:1583-2148 Agric : Price :$178,000 Deed : Total :$174,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:!4.5612 :B-304 OR 1583 PG 2148 1995 Tx:$2,547.85 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner :610-265-7968 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12C 6 , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :RELAX-WOS CO Folio #:79395001004 Strap ~:152450 B 4013A29 CoOwner : Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~401 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :10611 TAMIAMI TRL N NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$175,975 Xfered :10/29/92 Doc #:1765-1835 Agric : Price :$233,000 Deed : Total :$175,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Le~a! :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-401 OR 1765 PG 1835 1995 Tx:$2,562.40 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: " , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :RELAX-WOS CO Folio ~:79395001020 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 4023A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #402 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :10611 TAMIAMI TRL N NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$157,275 Xfered :12/04/90 Doc #:1576-0136 Agric : Price :$180,000 Deed : Total :$157,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :V~NDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-402 OR 1576 PG 136 1995 Tx:$2,290.11 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * ........................... MetroScan/Col[ier : ............................ Owner :O CCh'NOR CANES H Folio ~:79395001046 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 4033A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #403 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :840 RIVERVIEW DR CHATHAM MA 02633 Struct :$157,275 Xfered :01/20/94 Doc #:1906-0713 Agric : Price :$100 Deed :QUIT CLAIM Total :$157,275 Loan Amt: Loan :SELLER %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINib~ Millage:i4.5612 :B-403 OR 1906 PG 713 1995 Tx:$2,290.11 : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8921 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :MENISH ELIZABETH A Folio #:79395001062 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 4043A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #404 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :2470 WOODSWAY DR GREENWOOD IN 46143 Struct :$175,975 Xfered :12/17/90 Doc #:1579-0543 Agric : Price :$198,000 Deed : Total :S175,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:i00 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-404 OR 1579 PG 543 1995 Tx:$2,562.40 : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 .................... Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. Uwner :BOSTETTER JR MARTIN V Folio #:79395001088 CoOwner :JOANNE R BOSTETTER Strap #:152450 B 5013A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~501 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :200 N FAIRFAX ST ALEXANDRIA VA 22314 Struct :$176,975 Xfered :04/29/91 Doc #:1611-1113 Agric : Price :$225,500 Deed : Total :$176,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:!4.5612 :B-501 OR 1611 PG 1113 1995 Tx:$2,576.98 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: " * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : .............................. Owner :HOMER ROBERT W & BARBARA F Folio #:79395001101 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 5023A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #502 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :153 PARKWOOD DR KENNESAW GA 30144 Struct :$158,275 Xfered :09/12/91 Doc #:1647-0589 Agric : Price :$189,900 Deed : Total :$158,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-502 OR 1647 PG 589 1995 Tx:$2,304.68 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner :770-591-9121 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12C · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :MANGANO JOSEPH F & ANNE C Folio ~:79395001127 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 5033A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #503 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~503 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$158,275 Xfered :12/17/90 Doc #:1579-0535 Agric : Price :$179,000 Deed : Total :$158,275 Loan Ami: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-503 OR 1579 PG 535 1995 Tx:$1,940.64 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :JAMES ROBERT A & SUE B Folio #:79395001143 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 5043A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #504 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~504 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$176,975 Xfered :12/11/90 Doc #:1578-0079 Agric : Price :$202,000 Deed : Total :$176,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-504 OR 1578 PG 79 1995 Tx:$2,212.95 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 .................... Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 120 6 , ........................... MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :VANDENBERG CARL J & DEBORAH Folio #:79395001169 Strap ~:152450 B 6013A29 CoOwner : Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #601 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :16710 TINLEY PARK IL 60477 Struct :$177,975 Xfered :03/07/95 Doc ~:2036-1239 Agric : Price :$250,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$177,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-601 OR 2036 PG 1239 1995 Tx:$2,59i.54 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building' Sq MetroScan/Collier ........... * Owner :TREON TR MARSHALL E Folio #:79395001185 CcOwner :CF3dqLOTTE W TREON TR Strap ~:152450 B 6023A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~602 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~B-602 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$159,275 Xfered :03/16/93 Doc #:1805-1591 Agric : Price :$100 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$159,275 Loan Amt: Loan :SELLER %Imprvd:100 VestType:LIFE TENANT IntTy: % Owned:!00 Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:f4.5612 :B-602 OR 1805 PG 1591 1995 Tx:$1,955.20 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner :941-566-9173 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12C 6 · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :PELOSO DINO F & DONNA M Folio #:?9395001208 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 6033A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~603 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :51 PLEASANT RD GUELPH CANADA Struct :$159,275 Xfered :12/18/90 Doc #:1579-1851 Agric Price :$185,000 Deed : Total :$159,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :V~DERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :R-603 OR 1579 PG 1851 1995 Tx:$2,319.23 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:V~NDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :BOULTBEE DONALD E & MARGARET Folio #:79395001224 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 6043A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #604 NAPLES 33963 Land Mail :4820 6TH AVE SW NAPLES FL 33999 Struct :$177,975 Xfered :03/21/91 Doc #:1600-2064 Agric : Price : Deed : Total :$177,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:f4.5612 :B-604 OR 1600 PG 2064 1995 Tx:$2,591.54 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building'Sq'Ft The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : .................. 12C 6, Owner :FOX ALAN R & BARBARA F Folio ~:79395001240 Strap ~:152450 B 7013A29 CoOwner : Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #701 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :PO BOX 390 NEW YORK NY 09742 Struct :$178,975 Xfered :12/14/90 Doc ~:1578-2228 Agric : Price :$212,000 Deed : Total :$178,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Exempt : Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :V~DERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-701 OR 1578 PG 2228 1995 Tx:$2,606.10 -- Phone : Sub/Plat:V~2;DERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building~Sq Ft: , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :MURPHY ROBERT F/CAROLYN P DEROBBIO Folio ~:79395001266 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 7023A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #702 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11 JADE HILL RD AUBURN MA 01501 Struct :$160,275 Xfered :04/29/96 Doc #:2176-0765 Agric : Price :$263,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$160,275 Loan Amt:$210,400 Loan :CONVENTIONAL %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy:VARIABLE % Owned:100 Lender :MERCANTILE BK Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-702 OR 1590 PG 2157 1995 Tx:$2,333.78 -- Phone : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Non Guaranteed. 12C 6 * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :BANICH FRANCIS E & GLORIA J Folio ~:79395001282 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 7033A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~703 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :9 CAMELOT DR OAK BROOK IL 60521 Struct :$160,275 Xfered :12/12/90 Doc ~:1578-0697 Agric : Price :$190,000 Deed : Total :$160,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-703 OR 1578 PG 697 1995 Tx:$2,333.78 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building'Sq Ft: * ....................... :--: MetroScan/Collier : ............................. * Owner :VAN VOLKENBURG GARY & INGE Folio #:79395001305 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 7043A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~704 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :608 EDGEWATER CT SPRING LAKE MI 49456 Struct :$178,975 Xfered :02/14/91 Doc #:1592-2085 Agric : Price :$220,000 Deed : Total :$178,975 Lcan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-704 OR 1592 PG 2085 1995 Tx:$2,606.10 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Net Guaranteed. IIIIII 1111~11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII ............................................ IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIIIII IIIIII 12C 6 , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :781 93RD ST CORP Folio #:79395001321 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 8013A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~801 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :782 E 93RD ST BROOKLYN NY 11236 Struct :$179,975 Xfered :12/11/91 Doc #:1578-0066 Agric : Price :$196,000 Deed : Total :$179,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount Legal :VD_NDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-801 OR 1578 PG 66 1995 Tx:$2,620.66 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building. Sq ~ MetroScan/Collier ................ Owner :CD3.DIN WILLIE J & DOROTHEA E Folio #:79395001347 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 8023A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~802 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11116 GULFSHORE DR #802 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$161,275 Xfered :01/07/92 Doc ~:1676-1570 Agric : Price :$199,000 Deed : Total :$161,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt :HOMESTEAD Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount :$25,000 Legal :VD=NDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-802 OR 1676 PG 1570 1995 Tx:$1,984.34 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VkNDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Ncr Guaranteed. 12C 6 Owner :TOMCZAK JOHN J Folio #:79395001363 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 8033A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #803 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :PO BOX 1085 LUCER/~E CA 95458 Struct :$161,275 Xfered :01/07/91 Doc ~:1583-2125 Agric : Price :$204,000 Deed : Total :$161,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :V~DERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :5-803 OR 1583 PG 2125 1995 Tx:$2,348.34 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :THOMAS JOAN M Folio ~:79395001389 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 8043A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #804 NAPLES 33963 Land Mail :50AKHURST DR BUTLER PA 16001 Struct :$179,975 Xfered :09/01/93 Doc #:1861-0238 Agric : Price :$275,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$179,975 Loan Amt:$220,000 Loan :CONn;ENTION~LL %Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy:VARIABLE % Owned:100 Lender :CITIZENS NATL BK NAPLES Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LD~NDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-804 OR 1861 PG 238 1995 Tx:$2,620.66 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LA/~DINGS Owner :412-283-6753 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 120 6 · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :LANIG-RELAX COMPANY Folio #:79395001402 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 9013A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~901 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :10611 TAMIAMI TRL N NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$180,975 Xfered :07/12/94 Doc #:1966-1232 M Agric : Price :$255,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$180,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- 5~INIb~ Millage:14.5612 :B-901 OR 1966 PG 1232 1995 Tx:$2,635.20 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :FOISY JEAN PIERRE & ODETTE Folio #:79395001428 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 B 9023A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #902 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :2346 BENNINGTON GATE OAKVILLE CANADA Struct :$162,275 Xfered :03/18/91 Doc #:1600-0046 Agric : Price :$200,000 Deed : Total :$162,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:!4.5612 :B-902 OR 1600 PG 46 1995 Tx:$2,362.91 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................. Owner :FORMAN BRUCE R & PATRICIA E Folio #:79395001444 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 9033A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #903 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :1456 S BAYVIEW AVE S SEASIDE PK NJ 08752 Struct :$162,275 Xfered :12/07/90 Doc #:1577-0841 Agric : Price :$189,000 Deed : Total :$162,275 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount Legal :V~NDERBILT LAP;DINGS A CONDO- MiNIb~ Millage:14.56t2 :B-903 OR 1577 PG 841 1995 Tx:$2,362.9i : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ Owner :PIRRO TR ARMAND A Folio #:79395001460 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 B 9043A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #904 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11116 GULFSHORE DR NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$180,975 Xfered :02/21/91 Doc #:1594-0602 Agric : Price :$246,900 Deed : Total :$180,975 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :B-904 OR 1594 PG 602 1995 Tx:$2,635.20 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: LOt sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :ORRICO-HOLZINGER BARBARA Folio ~:79395001473 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 13A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #1 NAPLES 33963 Land Mail :280 PROSPECT AVE HACKENSACK NJ 07601 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :06/29/91 Doc ~:1541-0224 Agric : Price :$189,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :V~DERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-1 OR 1541 PG 224 1995 Tx:$61.88 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building. Sq Ft: , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :MITZELFELD TR JULIE A Folio ~:79395001486 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 23A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #2 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :2628 LAMBETH PARK ROCHESTER HILLS MI 48306 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :07/06/90 Doc #:1542-1485 Agric : Price :$196,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIb~ Millage:14.5612 :C-2 OR 1542 PG 1485 1995 Tx:$61.88 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12fi 6 · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ Owner :KOLODZIEJ FREDERICK J Folio #:79395001509 CoOwner :BARBARA R KOLODZIEJ Strap #:152450 C 33A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #3 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :16325 LATHROP AVE HARVEY IL 60426 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :06/25/91 Doc #:1539-0514 Agric : Price . :$159,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VkNDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-3 OR 1539 PG 514 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :VENOOKER LEWIS & LOIS Folio #:79395001525 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 43A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #4 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :110 PARKHURST DR WESTFORD MA 01886 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :07/23/91 Doc #:1545-2264 Agric : Price :$144,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-4 OR 1545 PG 2264 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 1 , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :WILLIAMS HOWARD R & DOROTHY Folio ~:79395001541 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 C 53A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~5 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11118 GULFSHORE DR #802 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :08/16/90 Doc ~:1551-1889 Agric : Price :$191,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-5 OR 1551 PG 1889 1995 Tx:$61.88 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner :941-591-4922 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building. Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :LATIMER R E & MAUREEN Folio ~:79395001567 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 C 63A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #6 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :321 CF~TELAINE CT WILLOWBROOK IL 60514 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :02/28/94 Doc #:1918-0885 Agric : Price :$5,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan :SELLER ~Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-6 OR 1918 PG 885 1995 Tx:$~1.88 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :MYHELIC STEVE M & SUSAN M ET AL Folio #:79395001583 CoOwner :BOB W Strap ~:152450 C 73A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #7 NAPLES 33963 Land Mail :9205 S 85TH CT HICKORY HILLS IL 60457 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :06/26/91 Doc ~:1539-1950 Agric : Price :$161,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-7 OR 1539 PG 1950 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * .......................... : MetroScan/Coltier ............................. * Owner :DES ROBERTS CECILIA Folio #:79395001606 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 83A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #8 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :565 COVENTRY LN GROSSE POINTE WOODS MI 48236truct :$4,250 Xfered :08/19/92 Doc #:1640-1823 Agric : Price :$228,000 Deed : Total :$4,~50 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-8 OR 1640 PG 1823 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12C 6 . .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :LEACH MARJORIE S Folio #:79395001622 Strap #:152450 C 93A29 CoOwner : Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~9 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :1118 GULF SHORE DR ~104A NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :06/03/91 Doc ~:1620-1383 Agric : Price :$172,900 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 % Owned: VestType: IntTy: Exempt : Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-9 OR 1620 PG 1383 1995 Tx:$6!.88 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :RUSCHKE HERBERT G & THERESE Folio ~:79395001648 Strap #:152450 C 103A29 CoOwner : Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #10 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :1865 N HALSTED ST CHICAGO IL 60614 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :06/12/91 Doc #:1623-1246 Agric : Price :$219,900 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:f4.5612 :C-10 OR 1623 PG 1246 1995 Tx:$61.88 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. · .......................... : NetroScan/Collie~ : ............................ * Owner :~OPPEL~LAN ~LL~AM A Folio #:79395001664 CoOwner :JUDITH A KOPPELMAN Strap ~:152450 C 113A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #11 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :W325N70 92 CLEARWATER DR HARTLAND WI 53029 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :02/12/91 Doc #:1592-1087 Agric : Price :$240,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-11 OR 1592 PG 1087 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Fi: Building Sq Ft: · ........................... MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :PAQUETTE GEP~ALD R & DEBORA2q Folio #:79395001680 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 C 123A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #12 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :100 RD TIMMINS WATERLOO CANADA Struct :$4,250 Xfered :01/03/92 Doc ~:1676-0139 Agric : Price :$267,500 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-12 OR 1676 PG 139 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 6 · .......................... : MetroScan/Coll±er ............................. Owner :KUSHNER GARRY W ET AL Folio ~:79395001703 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 133A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~13 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :AVE THUNDER BAY F ONTARI AUSTRALIA Struct :$4,250 Xfered :11/22/91 Doc #:1665-0605 Agric : Price :$257,500 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-13 OR 1665 PG 605 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:485 S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :MA/TN KARNIG & SHERRI Folio ~:79395001729 CoOwner :CHARLES;ALYCE MANN Strap ~:152450 C 143A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~14 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :389 WOODLAWN RD W GUELPH CANADA Struct :$4,250 Xfered :03/06/91 Doc ~:1600-2060 Agric : Price : Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:10G VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-14 OR 1600 PG 2060 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Ptat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:485 S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is No~ Guaranteed. 120 6 · .......................... : Me~o$can/Coll±e~ ............................. Owner :ENGLER GEORGE F & ELEANOR J Folio #:79395001745 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 153A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #15 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :5289 ROBERTS RD HAMBURG NY 14075 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :08/28/91 Doc #:1643-1329 Agric : Price :$5,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :V~DERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-15 OR 1643 PG 1329 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: · ........................... MetroScan/Collier ............................. Owner :NOWAK STEPHEN T & MARYANN S Folio ~:7939500!761 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 163A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~16 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :PO BOX 145 ROSELLE IL 60172 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :10/10/90 Doc #:1564-1407 Agric : Price :$260,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-16 OR 1564 PG 1407 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is No~ Guaranteed. , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :RUEBEL MARION/NEOMA M Folio #:79395001787 Strap #:152450 C 173A29 CoOwner : Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~17 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :2888 BANCROFT RD AKRON OH 44333 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :06/18/96 Doc ~:2195-2343 Agric : Price :$8,000 Deed :QUIT CLAIM Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan :PRIVATE %Imprvd:100 VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender :PRIVATE Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount ~ Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-17 OR 1629 PG 1196 1995 Tx:$61.88 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building. Sq Ft: , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :HALL DOUGLAS J & CAROLE T Folio ~:79395001800 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 C 183A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #18 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :5263 KINGS GATE WAY BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48302ruct :$4,250 Xfered :07/12/91 Doc ~:1543-2344 Agric : Price :$184,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:!4.5612 :C-18 OR 1543 PG 2344 1995 Tx:$61.88 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.0~' Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 6 * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ Owner :VANDENBERG JEAN E & CARL R Folio #:79395001826 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 C 193A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #19 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :6730 174TH ST TINLEY PARK IL 60477 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :08/02/91 Doc #:1636-2177 Agric : Price :$207,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MiNi~! Millage:14.5612 :C-19 OR 1636 PG 2177 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ Owner :HOFF EDWARD W & KATHRYN R Folio #:79395001842 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 203A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #20 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :11116 GULFSHORE DR #B-103 NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :08/12/91 Doc #:1639-0083 Agric : Price :$166,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-20 OR 1639 PG 83 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block i Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 12C 6 , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :VAN VOLKENURG GARY & INGE Folio ~:79395001868 Strap #:152450 C 213A29 CoOwner : Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~21 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :608 EDGEWATER CT SPRING LAKE MI 49456 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :02/14/91 Doc #:1592-2085 Agric : Price :$220,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-2! OR 1592 PG 2085 1995 Tx:$61.88 -- Phone : Sub/P!at:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: " , .......................... : MetroScan/Collier ............................. * Owner :ELPERS MARJORIE L Folio #:79395001884 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 C 223A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #22 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :83 BEAUVOIR CIR ANDERSON IN 46011 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :03/29/91 Doc ~:1602-2084 Agric : Price :$184,900 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:10C VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-22 OR 1602 PG 2084 1995 Tx:$61.88 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is No%: Guaranteed. * .......................... : HetroScan/Coll±er : ............................ · Owner :BOUL?BBB DONALD g & N. ARGARET Fol±o ~:79395001907 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 233A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #23 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :352 WYLDHAVEN RD ROSEMONT PA 19010 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :03/21/91 Doc ~:1600-2064 Agric : Price : Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 . VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-23 OR 1600 PG 2064 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner :610-525-5084 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ · Owner :PARKER ROBERT J & MARILYN B Folio ~:7939500i923 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 C 243A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #24 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :4108 ROYAL FOX DR SAINT CHARLES IL 60174 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :07/16/91 Doc #:1632-1135 Agric : Price :$3,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-24 OR 1632 PG 1135 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 .... Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Bu 1 9 q'Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 6 · .......................... : MeCroScan/CoIiier : ..................... ~ Owner :BENEZETTE ROBERT A G VIVIAN Folio #:79395001949 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 253A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~25 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :PO BOX 9079 NAPLES FL 33941 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :12/04/91 Doc ~:1576-0133 Agric : Price :$168,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-25 OR 1576 PG 133 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner :813-835-3393 Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building- Sq Ft: · .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ Owner :TOMCZAK JOHN J Folio #:79395001965 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 263A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~26 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :PO BOX 1085 LUCERNE CA 95458 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :01/07/91 Doc #:1583-2125 Agric : Price :$204,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-26 OR 1583 PG 2125 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * ........................... MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :FORMAN BRUCE R & PAT~~T Folio ,:79395001981 CoOwner : ~.._.~.~ ~%~DRESS strap #:152450 c 273A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~G~A~$19~SOCI^TION Land : Mail :1456 S BAYVIEW AVE SEASIDE PARK NJ 08752 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :12/19/91 Doc ~:1672-0756 Agric : Price :$4,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-27 OR 1672 PG 756 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ * Owner :FOX ALAN R & BARBARA F Folio #:79395002003 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 C 283A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~28 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :89 WALLKILL AVE MONTGOMERY NY 12549 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :08/26/93 Doc #:1859-0434 Agric : Price :$10,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan :SELLER %Imprvd:100 VestType:MILRRIED PERSONS IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VA~DERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-28 OR 1859 PG 434 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 120 6 , .......................... : Metro$¢an/Ooll±er : ............................ Owner :FOISY JEAN PIERRE & ODETTE Folio #:79395002100 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 333A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #33 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :2346 BENNINGTON GATE OAKVILLE CANADA Struct :$4,250 Xfered :03/18/91 Doc #:1600-0046 Agric : Price :$200,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-33 OR 1600 PG 46 1995 Tx:$61.88 -- Phone -- : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building' Sq Ft: · ........................... MetroScan/Collier .............................. Owner :BANICH FRANCIS E & GLORIA J Folio #:79395002126 CoOwner : Strap ~:152450 C 343A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #34 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :9 CAMELOT DR OAK BROOK IL 60521 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :12/12/91 Doc ~:1578-0697 Agric : Price :$190,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: In~Ty: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LANDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-34 OR 1578 PG 697 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant : R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building Sq Ft: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is No~ Guaranteed. 12g 6 * .......................... : MetroScan/Collier : ............................ , Owner :PELOSO DINO F & DONNA M Folio #:79395002142 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 353A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR ~35 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :51 PLEASA/qT RD GUELPH CANdiDA Struct :$4,250 Xfered :12/18/91 Doc ~:1579-1851 Agric : Price :$185,000 Deed : Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 VestType: IntTy: % Owned: Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT L~tNDINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-35 OR 1579 PG 1851 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LkNDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Building' Sq Ft: * ........................... MetroScan/Collier : ............................ , Owner :LANIG-RELAX COMP;tNY Folio #:79395002168 CoOwner : Strap #:152450 C 363A29 Site :11116 GULFSHORE DR #36 NAPLES 33963 Land : Mail :10611 TA~4I~%MI TRL N NAPLES FL 33963 Struct :$4,250 Xfered :07/12/94 Doc #:1966-1232 M Agric : Price :$255,000 Deed :WARRANTY Total :$4,250 Loan Amt: Loan : %Imprvd:100 Ves~Type: IntTy: % Owned:100 Lender : Exempt : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Amount : Legal :VANDERBILT LA/~DINGS A CONDO- MINIUM Millage:14.5612 :C-36 OR 1966 PG 901 1995 Tx:$61.88 : -- Phone -- Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT LANDINGS Owner : Census :Tract 102.01 Block 1 Tenant :941-591-8021 R:25E T:48S S:29 Lot Acres: Lot sq The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 120 6 ABUTTING AND OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET OF PLATS 1. Vanderbilt Bay Landings Associates, Ltd. P.O. Box 10580 Naples, Florida 34101 2. Naples Memorial Gardens, Inc. 586 lllth Avenue N Naples, Florida 34108 3. Mauro LaGrasta and Anna LaGrasta 496 Flamingo Avenue Naples, Florida 34108 4. Collier Development Corporation Everglades, Florida 5. Teresa Olivier and Genevieve Zanetti 897 Vine Street Sudbury, Ontario, Canada 6. VL Pelot, Inc. 11040 Vanderbilt Drive Naples, Florida 34108 7. Collier County Collier County Courthouse 3301 Tamiami Trail E Naples, Florida 34112 8. Gulf Shore Lake Villas, Inc. 2063 Trade Center Way Naples, Florida 34109 7,1854 1.WP5 Composite Exhibit "A" Collier County, Florida REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk of the Board: Please place the following as a: / X/ Normal Legal Advertisement / E3/ Other: (Display Adv,, location, elc.) Originating Dept/Div' Transportation/Public Works Person: Russ Mull_~.. Date: ' (Sign clearly).~.. ~.~ Petition No. (If none. give brief description): Petition AV g6-001 Petitioner: (Name & address): See Composite Exhibit 'C" Name & Address of any person(s) to be not,ed by Clerk's O~ce: See List of Adjacent Prope~ ~ners (If more space needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before: ~BCC / /B~ / /Other Requested hearing dale:-Feb~a~ 24~ Based on advedisement appearing 15 days before hearing. ~ , '~ ' . . Z:~'/ /:'. ..... ..'"~ ~. L;.,.~' Newspaper(s) lo be used:/~O~let;;nly, impOdant ~. '/~ Naples Daily News or legally required/~) / / Other Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common lo.lions & size): PETITION AV 96-001 TO VACATE THE PLATS OF WIGGINS PASS ~DING UNIT NO. 1 AS RECORDED IN P~T BOOK 10. PAGE 44. AND WIGGINS PASS ~NDINGS UNIT NO. 1 ADDITION AS RECORDED IN P~T BOOK 10, PAGE 81, ALL OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNt, FLORIDA. Companion petition(s), if any. & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee Include Advedising Cost? Yes/~ No/~/ If yes, what account should be charges for advedising costs 101-163610-649100 .................. ..................... ;;i; .................... Division Head Ed Ilschner Coun~ Administrator Robert F. Fernandez List Attachments: (1) Resolution (2) Legal Description (3) List of Adjacent Prope~ Owners DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or B~: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to Coun~ Manager. Note: If legal documents is involved, be sure that any n~essa~ legal review, or request for same, is submitted to Coun~ Attorney before submitting to Coun~ Manager. ~e Manager's O~ce will distribule copies: B. /~ Coun~ Manager agenda file; ~ Requesting Division; /~ Original to Clerk's O~ce O~her hearing~: Ini[iating Division Head to approve and submit original to Clerk's O~ce, retaining a copy for file. ................................................................................................ FQR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ON~ Date Received Date Adve~ised Date of P,H. IZG 6 January 23, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice two times, one time on Sunday, February 22, 1998 and one time on Sunday, March 1, 1998 and send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Sincerely~ ~uehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. Acct. No. 101-163610-649100 12C NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, ~RCH 10, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition AV-96-001, Kenneth B. Cuyler as agent for owners, Delnor-Neptune Properties, Delnor Towers Unit Nine, Inc., Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners and A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc., requesting the vacation of the Plats of Wiggins Pass Landing Unit No. 1 as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 44, and Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1 addition as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 81, all of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All interested parties are invited to attend, to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board prior to the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of thf~ proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COP[MISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Jcdy S. Kuehne, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) [ i[l[I [1[ lin [ [ IIlllllllllllll I Il I I Ill I .......... Il [ I I I 12C 6 March 11, 1998 Mr. James Elkins Fairway Building Suite 303 1000 Tamiami Trail N Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that above-referenced petition was inadvertently omitted from the Board of County Commissioners ._~ agenda of March 10, 1998 and will be considered on Tuesday, ,m~-Ap~i-~--t4, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The o~ legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March~L~, 1998 and ~unday, April ~, 1998. A~/ You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure cc: Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Richard Yovanovich Delnor-Neptune Properties William B. Gest A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc. ........ ~ ~l I I I ............. I IIII IIII I1'111 I II I 12g County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 4130~4 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT Dwight E. Brock COUNTY RECORDER Clerk CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS January 22, 1998 Re: Notice of Public Hearing re Petition AV-96-001 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to the petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February, 22, 1998 and Sunday, March 1, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK J~~. Kuehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. Ii111111111111111111111111111111111111111111i11111111111111111 598 01-231 17:22 ~ 01' 56 9263~86~ OK 068C~8~AIB TOT~t_ ~PGS 55 I ".~ ~ --~,~.. 12C 6 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TI'AIL EAST PO, BOX 413044 CIRCUIT COURT NAPLES. FLORIDA 34101-3044 COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER Dwight E. Brock CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CORRE~ I'.~ January 27, 1998 James Elkins Fairway Bldg Suite 303 1000 Tamiami Trail N Naples, FL 34102 RE: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please disregard my letter of January 23, 1998, concerning Petition AV-96-001. The letter indicated that the hearing would be February 24, 1998 and the notice would be advertised on February 8 and February 15, 1998. This is incorrect. Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 22, 1998 and Sunday, March 1, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Kuehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. cc: Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Rich Yovanovich Delnor-Neptune Properties William B. Gest A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc. ftaples Daily fle~s Naples, FL 33940 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily flews A/10 PE"rm0ffS BOARD OF COUNTY CO~IH[SSIONERS NO:rICEOF ATTN: HAHCY SAL~U8 ~flLlC~ARING N~lce ~ h~ebv given PO ~X 413016 ~ ~e ~rd HAPLE5 FL 3~01-~0q6 Commlsslo~rs of C~Ii~ heorln~ on TUESDAY, er. ~ ~nme~ REFERENCE: ~1230 10~1636~49~ emer, 3301 Emt To~lo. 57~9~$2 NOT~CE OF PUBLIC HEA The me~lng will ~ln 9:~ A.~. The ~d will State of FLorida consider Petition AV- 96-~1, Kenne~ B. Cuyle County of Collier os o~nl f~ o~ers, Del. n~-Neptune Prickles, Before the undersigned authority, personally Del~ Towns appeared B. Lamb, ~ho on oath says that she serves I~., Deln~ E~er~lses as the Assistant Cat,rate Secretary of the Naples A.L.Unlt Eleven~edy Daily Ne~s, a da~Ly newspaper published at Naples, re~estl~ ~e v~ ~e PI~ of Wl~lns in Collier County, Florida: that the attached L~dlng Unit No. I ~ re. copy of advertising was published in said c~ In ~ 44, o~ Wl~lns Pros newspaper on dates list~. Lo~ln~ Unit No. ~ o~1. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily +i~ ~ receded In PI~ Ne~s is a newspaper published at Naples, in said ~ P~IIc R~ds of Co Co~lier County, Florida, and that the said Cou~,Fl~i~. newspaper has heretofore been continuously All I~,~rested Po~les ~e Inv~ to ~end, fo published in said Collier County, Florida, each regi~er ~ day and has been enter~ as second class ~il subm~ ~lr'~l~s, matter at the ~st office in Naples, in said ~dIn ~ng, fo ~1~ fo ~e public Collier County, Florida, for a peri~ of 1 year h~l~. Any ~r~n ~o ~cld- next prec~ing the first publication of the es ~ ~ol o ~clslon of attached copy of advertisement/ and affiant ~e B~d will need o re. further says that she has neither paid nor pe~om~ng fherefo, ond promised any person, firm or co~ration any m~ef~e~ ~y ~ed discount, rebate, commission or refund for the r~dens~e ~e preening° V~m pur~se of securing this advertisement for Is m~e, which rec~d In. publication in the said newspaper c~s ~e ~y PUBLISHED ON: 02/22 03/01 BOARD OF COUNTY COmmISSIONER S COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. CHAIR~N DWIGHT E. B~OCK, CLERK NO. 334~ Signature of Affian~ Sworn to and Subscrib~ before me this ') day of '1;%t 19 Naptes, FL 33940 Affidavit of Publication Haples Daily Hews 0110 BOARD OF (~;tTY CO~H%SS%OHER$ NOTmCEOF ATTN: NANCY SAL~UB PUeLmC~ARING PO BOX &13016 N~lce Is h~eby given ~ ~e ~d of C~ NAPLES FL 3~101-3016 ~missto~s of C~lier C~, will holu o public hearing on TUESDAY, ~ARCH 10, 1~8, in ~e REFERENCE: ~1230 q0116361~91 Ce~er, 3~1 E~t Tomto- 57~9132 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA mi Trail, N~les, Fl~i~. State of FLorida consider Petltlon AV. 9~1, Ke~ B. Cuyler County of Collier ~ ~ f~ ~ers, Del- Before the undersigned authority, personally n~.Nepfune Prooertles, Oel~ T~S UnU Nl~, appeared B. Lamb, v~ on oath says that she serve~ Deln~ Eme~rlses as the Assistant Cat,rate Secretary of the Naptes UnH Eleven P~rs A.L. ~ughe~y Co., Inc.. Dai[y Heys, a dai Ly nevspaper published at Naples, reouestlng ~e voc~l~ in Collier County, FLorida: that the attached ~e Pl~ ~ wi~ins copy of advertising ~as published ~n said Londl~ Unit NO. 1 OS re- newspaper on dates Listed. ~ 44, and Wi~lns Pass Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily Lo~i~s Unit No. Ne~s is a newspaper pub[ish~ at Naples, in said ~ 10, P~81, olofthe Collier County, Ftorida, and that the said Public Rec~ds of Collier newspaper has heretofore been continuously AIl nterested po~les published in said Collier County, FLorida, each ~e Inv~ed to ~end, to r~lster to ~, and to day and has been entered as second class mail su~U ~elr ~te~lons, ~tter at the ~st office in Naples, in said an~, In ~ltl~, to ~e ~d ~J~ to ~e public Collier County, Florida, for a peri~ of 1 year he~ln~ Any perm ~o ~cld. next preening the first publication of the es to ~em a ~clsl~ of attached copy of advertisement; and affiant ~e B~d will need a re- further says that she has neither paid nor c~d ~ the pr~l~s pe~olnlng thereto, and promised any person, firm or co~ration any ~eref~e, ~v ~ed to discount, rebate, commission or refund for the ensure ~ o ver~lm rec~d ~ ~e pr~eedin~ purism of securing this advertisement for is m~,~lchrec~d publication in the said newspaper, c~s ~e te~y ond evld~e ~ ~ich D OF COUNTY PUBLISHE0 ON: 02/22 03/01 CO~SS~ONERS CaLL.ER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. ~EERY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, C~RK AD SPACE: 65.~ INCH D~Cle~ ................................................................ NO, ] 143~50 Signature of Affiant Sworn to and Subscrtb~ before me this ~ day of ~;','~L CLIENT ~F ~0.: wI~S pASS ~ re~estmd, a status searck above n~ed co~oration in the fo!!ow~g jurisdiction. Jurisdiction: FLORIDA State of origin: DE~73Z ~ .f Date 8-2S-73 Co~oraticn Mo.: 830737 K-gistered Agent/o~ice: CT C0~0~TiOh' SYS~M '- 1200 P~e island Road ~ o~ antation, . . _ FL 33324 C~od Standing: YES Ac:ire: YES yJ~f - See attached · ~ . MENU, -. OFFICERS, 4. EVENTS, .,.~ NOTES: 6. NAMES, 7 LIST, 8 NEXT, l ENTER SELECTION AND CR: 1/0~7~6 OFFiCER/DiRECTOR DETAIL SCREEN CORP NUMBER: 830737 CORP NAME: A.L. DOUGHERTY CO., iNC. /TITLE; DTD NAME: iDOUGHERTY, PHYLLIS K. 20 COUNTRY i DANVILLE, IL /TITLE: %rD' NAME: DOUSHE~TY, CHARLOTTE K. / ~ lS AMBASSADOR DRIVE ~ANVILLE, IL ~./~TLE: AT NA~E: PETER~ON, SARA D. i 831 FRANKLIN , DONWERS GROVE, IL ITLE, S NAME: NEWELL, JULIE S. ~28 SAND HILL RD COVINGTON, IN · 5. NOTES, & NAMES + NE×'F, - PREV, i. ~ENU~ 2. FILING, 3 TOP~ 4. EVENTS~ · 7. LIST~ S. NEXT BY LIST, 9. PREV SY LIST ENTER SELECTION AND 2ett;: ' .'.~sle ::r. rol~ T..iur:--.d 175" ? .-,.-ernl~l Drive 3' -an .... ~.c.. ~ _ 3..".9.37 : .... Jonsen 20 " '-L - jo:tr. !. Car!i.~!e 47C !.':'/' ?3.30 Cast 7e~ar .-'ei_.-':t.; Dr. Qus+, '. :;'esi Liber,.-.: .~., , ........ '.','r. rrer.: C~ .: .~l!in:.~. 2. 3!~00 .'.ins.-.orth 2900 2ra--ford ?mad i.e?per ~i:.:e,, CT; --:~.~: Colm-~bus~ CE-,.~--~--.--~ 3C5! ~'-;- Alto 32 n '-~ 12~..~e ~..: -- ~acson~.iZ 35741 .2a::e -' ' ' '% C'/.~T7 2!era ' ::ir, es Lucile ". iol;:o C.~_:en ii. "i:ue-~ 147 For'-at~ ...... ,r?~ ~ -' -~ ~ ' Warren: C': 4-~-.~3 2olunbus: ~.; 43220 .'jlene '. ':el!ey l<z.ncv .... jer-;ins 2753 -a:is-'a.-. ~our~ ~.~/.~.. ..~.. 2ierra Vi.:ta _-rive Col'~--~u~ ,~.:~ ,'-3209 l:,-.cr, ster, 'l 93534 ~'o:~-. ~ -oro-::~' · ~-.- - r~ i¢2 .L---- _-orozhv S D i "~' ~-~ .... D i e ]o'_uubus~ ~..: ...... _'-tow: ']': 44224 ' "-~ '~='' Lilly Schoonover i:'re:'ocJ:!e 2~,~_ ~alazar Drive Tm:st ].fission ",'e~ ~o, 2535 Covcntr;- .~.oa;2 ~har!es" :~'es!eI :Tinifred Li'-' :.:utsc:'_-:'",-u 3~-? *'"' '"'- ~ 10901 .'..:al:Ion: :7.1. Ddblin: C.-. 4.3~'!7 9eorje j. Yurick ~'"~'~ ~'orkshire ?mad .. ,{?r ... ,~lt'+~. ....-?' / RESOLUTION NO. 98- 12g RESOLUTION FOR PETITION AV 96-001 TO VACATE THE PLATS OF WIGGINS PASS LANDING UNIT NO. I AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I0, PAGE 44, AND WIGGINS PASS LAND1NGS UNIT I ADDITION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 81, ALL OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 177.101, Florida Statules, Kenneth B. Cuyler as agent for owners, Delnor-Neptune Properties, Delner Towers Unit Nine, Inc., Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners and A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc., does hereby request the vacation of Ihe Plals of Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. I as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 44, and Wiggins Pass Landings Unite No.l Addition as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 81, all of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Board has this day held a public hearing to consider vacation said plats as more fully described below, and notice of said public hearing to vacate was given as required by law; and WHEREAS, the granting of tile vacation will not adversely affect the ownership of righl of convenient access of other property ownt. rs; and NOW, TItEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNIY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that thc following be hereby vacated: ~,~ ~.~,.'~- X' ,,~,_~.~ThMalms-r~Wigging2.~L.~ndings Unit No. I asj. oeon:le~, Plat o.a ,: .... po,-.~.~t Boo} 10, Page 44, an~gs Unit No, i ...... ~at Book lO, Page~'~3~.~Public Records o! Collier County, Florida. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk is hereby direcled to advertise the adoption of this Resolution once in a paper of general circulation in the County within 30 days following its adoption. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED. that the Clerk is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution, thc proof of publication of thc notice of public hearing, and the proof of publication ~o_f_thc notice of ~oplion of this Resolution in tile Public Records of (:'oilier Countv. Florida and to make proper notations of Ibis vacation on said plat. This resolution adopted after motiun, second and majorily vote favoring same this day of 1998. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk , Chaimmn Approved as to form anti legs, .... ~ciency: Assistant County Atlomey RM/ImlI21597/R¢~,o AY 96.¢1~11 doc EXIt I i; ['I' ".,\" BBLS t or 6 SURVEYORS & MAPPERS ~C. 14848 OLD 41. SUIT~ 4 NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 I0 TE[T:PHONE: 941-597-13 ] $ FAX: 94]-597-5207 !-FGAL DESCRIPTION ,~! ]_-OF WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1 ~DI~ON. ACCO~G TO ~ ~OF ~C~~ ~ PMT B00~ 10, AT PA~E Sl OFT~ ~C ~O~S OP CO~ CO~ ~~ ~ Ail. OF ~~S P~S ~~GS ~ NO. 1, AC~~G TO ~ PMT T~OF ~CO~ED ~ PMT B~K 10, AT PAGE ~ ~ Pb~LIC ~CO~S OF CO~ CO~, ~O~ L~ ~N~ EXCE~ ~E ~E~Y ~,~ ~ET ~A~RWA~, BErG MO~ P~C~Y D~ED ~ FO~WS: BEGGING AT ~ SO--ST CO~ OF LOT 4 OF ~ ~~S P~S ~~GS ~T NO. i ~D~ON; ~CE N.gg~5220'W. ~ONG ~ ~~Y L~ OF ~ LOT 4, A DIST~N~ OF 5~.~ ~ TO ~ SOU~T COF~ OF ~ ~T 4, ~ $~ B~G ~ SO~T CO~ OF ~T 10, ~ 1 OF ~ ~GG~S P~ ~~GS ~ NO. 1; ~~ N.89~5220~. ~NG ~ ~~Y L~ OF ~ ~~S PASS ~~GS ~2T NO. 1, A DIST~CE OF 150.65 ~ TO ~ ~U~T CO~ OF BL~ Z OF S~ WI~S P~ ~~GS ~ NO. I; ~CE N.~°I4'00'W. A DIST~CE OF I971.91 ~ TO A PO~ ON ~ NOR~Y ~ OF S~ ~GG~S P~S ~~GS ~T NO. I: ~~ N.g?°4g'00~. ~NG ~ NOK~Y L~ A DIST~CE OF 14gl .48 TO ~ NOR~T CO~ OF ~T 3, BL~K 3 OF S~ ~~S P~S ~~GS ~ NO. 1; ~~ S.02°12'00'E. A D~T~CE OF 163,~ ~ TO ~ NOR~ST ~~ OF ~T 1, B~ 3 OF S~ ~GG~S P~S ~~GS NO. I; ~CE N.~4~. A D~T~N~ OF 2~.00 ~T TO ~ NOR~ST ~~ OF ~ LOT 1; ~~ S.02N2'00~. ~NG ~ ~~Y L~ OF ~~'S P~S ~~GS ~T NO. 1, A D~Tz~ OF ~K 16 ~T TO ~ SO~T CO~ OF ~T 1, B~K i OF S~ WIGG~S P~S ~~GS ~IT NO. 1, ~ ~ B~G ~E NOR~ST GOeR OF LOT 1 OF S~D P~S ~~GS ~ NO. 1 ~DITION; ~CE S.02:12'00'~. ~ONG ~ ~S~Y ~ OF ~ ~3GG~S P~ ~~GS ~ NO. 1 ~D~ON, A / DIST~ OF 1209.93 ~ TO ~ ~ OF BEGginG, P~ CO~$ 7g.2g A~, MO~ OR L~S. 4 ~N oJ'~l'l. 14.1.9c~ ~ ~ P-: 5~PM, ~i~.~ (ROI~TZ£I~FtPlDRESS) EXHIBIT "A" 2of 61 BEARINGS REFER TO W/COINS PASS LANDI~GS UN1T NO. I ADDITION. ACCORDING 2 C 6 TO TIlE PLAT THERP. X)F RECORDED [N PLAT BOOK 10. AT PAGE 81 OF TH~ PUBLIC rU~COP. DS OF co~z~m~ ~, H. ortn~^. THIS P~OPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EAS~, RESERVATIONS, OR RESTRICTIONS OF RETRD. (SEE ATTACrmD SKETCH) 2 EXHIBIT "A'i . 20 6 BB~ ~YO~ · ~PE~ ~C. N~, ~~A 34~ ]0 ~HO~: 941-597-1315 F~: 941-597-5207 LEGAL DES~RIF~ON ALL OF WIG-OINS PASS LAND.OS UNIT NO, 1 ADDITION, ACGORDING TO IPIE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, AT PAOE 81 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, AND ALL OF WICK}INS PASS LANDINGS UNTr NO. 1, ACCORDING TO ~- PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, AT PAGE 44 .OF THE PUBLIC P,,ECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LF.$S A~q) EXCEFI TEl, WEffl'F-,RLY 2,f~00 FEET O;¥'ATERWAYI BEING MORE PARTI~Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGI2~'~'G AT THE $OLFrttEAST COKNER OF LOT 4 OF SAID WIG-GINS PASS LA.,N'DINGS UNiT NO. I ADDITION; TH]~CE N. 89°52'20"W. ALONG TTIE SOUPY LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 599.96 FF_4ET TO 'I'ftE SOUTPIWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, 'l'fiE SAME BEINO THE SO~ CORNER OF LOT 10, BLCX'~ 1 OF SAID WI~L'NS PASS LANDINGS LrNIT NO. 1; TEENCE N.$9~52"20~W. ALOMG THE SOUTHE2~Y LINE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1, A DISTANCE OF 11~0.65 FEET TO THE SO~T COIC\'ER OF BLOCK 2, OF SAD WlCrCr~S PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1; II-IENCE N.00°14'00%V. A DISTANCE OF 1971.91 FEET TO A PORfl' ON THE NORTHERLY LLNE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANI)INGS UNIT NO. I; THENCE N.87~4g'00'E. ALONG SAD NOKTI-IIKRLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1481.48 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK 3 OF SAID WlGGIN'S PASS I2%NDINOS uNrr NO. 1; TFf152qC~ S. 02°12~30"E. A DISTANCE OF I63.77 FEET TO THE NORTHWF~T CORNER OF LOT l, BLOCK 3 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNTF N'O. 1; TPIENCE N. gT~4g'00"E. A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FL~T TO THE NORT}{EAST CORNt~ OF SAID LOT 1; Tt~__ NCE S.02~12'00'E. ALONG Tf{E EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1, A DLSTANCE OF 66S. I6 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1, THE SAME BEING IHE NORTHEAST COtLN'ER OF LOT 1 OF SAID WIC-GINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. ! ADDITION; THENCE S.02°12~0'E. ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS L~N'DINGS UNIT NO. 1 ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 1209.93 FEET TO THE POEN'T OF BEGI1N'NII~G, PAR _CE!_ ~ CONTAINS 7g2~ ACRES, MOPE OP, LESS. ' ~o~ 12C 6 B~G$ ~ TO ~~$ P~ ~~GS ~ NO. 1 ~D~ON, ACCO~G TO ~ P~T ~~ ~~ ~ P~T B~K 10, AT PAGE ~1 Of ~ P~C ~~S OF CO~ CO~, ~~ ~S ~OP~ IS S~ TO ~S, ~S~VA~ONS, OR ~~ONS OF ~~. (SEE ATTAC. J-~__ .r) SKETCH} 2 12C 6 COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "C" Composite Owner's Name Property Exhibit .& Address Owned Reference Delnor-Neptune Properties Block 1, Lot 2 C-2 c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. Unit No. 1 6th Floor. Society Building 159 South Main Street Parcel I.D. No. Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 81880080007 Phone: (216) 762-2411 A. L. Dougherty Co., Inc, Block 1, Lots 1, 3, 4, C-I,C-3 c/o James W. Elkins, Esq. 5, 6 & 7 James W. Elkins, P,A, Unit No. I 1000 Tamiami Trail North Suite 303 Parcel I.D. No. Naples. Florida 33940 81880120006 Phone: (813) 263-0910 81880160008 81880200007 81880240009 81880280001 Neptune Apartments Unit Seven. Inc. Block I, Lot 8 C-4 n/k/a Delnor-Neptune Properties Unit No. 1 c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Parcel I.D. No. 159 South Main Street 81880320000 Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 Phone: (216) 762-2411 Neptune Apartments Unit Eight. Inc. Block 1, Lot 9, C-5 n/k/a Delnor-Neptune Properties Unit No. 1 c/o Nickolas P. Andrceff, Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Parcel I.D. No. 159 South Main Street 81880360002 Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 Phone: (216) 762-2411 Delnore-Neptune Properties Block 1, Lot 10 C-2 c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. Unit No. ! 6th Floor, Society Building 159 South Main Street Parcel I.D. No. Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 81880400001 Phone: (216) 762-2411 12C 6 Composite Owner's Name Property Exhibit & Address Owned. Reference A. L. Dougherty Co., Inc. Block 2, Unit No. I C-7 c/o James W. Elkins, Esq. James W. Elkins, P.A. Parcel I.D. No. 1000 Tamiami Trail North 81880440003 Suite 303 Naples, Florida 33940 Phone: (813) 263-0910 Neptune Apartments Unit Nine, Inc. Block 3, Lot 1, .C-8 n/k/a Delnor-Neptune Properties Unit No. 1 c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Parcel i.D. No. 159 South Main Street 81880480005 Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 Phone: (216) 762-2411 Neptune Apartments Unit Ten, Inc. Block 3, Lot 2, C-9 n/k/a Delnor-Neptune Properties Unit No. 1 c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Parcel I.D. No. 159 South Main Street 81880520004 Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 Phone: (216) 762-2411 Delnor Towers Unit Thirteen, Inc. Block 3, Lot 3, C-lO n/k/a Delnor-Neptune Properties Unit No. 1 c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff. Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Parcel I.D. No. 159 South Main Street 81880560006 Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 Phone: (216) 762-2411 Delnor Towers Unit Twelve, Inc. Block 3, Lot 4, C-Il n/Wa Delnor-Neptune Properties Unit No. 1 c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Parcel I.D. No. 159 South Main Street 81880600005 Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 Phone: (216) 762-2411 120 6 Composite Owner's Name Property Exhibit & Address Owned Reference Delnor Towers Unit Five, Inc. Block 3, Lot I 1, C-18 n/k/a Delnor-Neptune Properties Unit No. 1 c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Parcel I.D. No. 159 South Main Street 81880880003 Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 Phone: (216) 762-2411 A. L. Dougherty Co., Inc. Block 3, Lots 12, 13. C-19 c/o .lames W. Elkins, Esq. 14, 15 and 16, James W. Elkins, P.A. Unit No. 1 I000 Tamiami Trail North Suite 303 Parcel I.D. No. Naples. Florida 33940 81880920002 Phone: (813) 263-0910 81880900004 81881000002 81881040004 81881080006 A. L. Dougherty Co., Inc. Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, C-20 c/o James W. Elkins. Esq. Unit No. I Addition James W. Elkins. P.A. 1000 Tamiami Trail North Parcel I.D. No. Suite 303 81930040007 Naples, Florida 33940 81930080009 Phone: (813) 263-0910 81930120008 81930160000 48626 I.WP5 120 6 Composite Owner's Name Property Exhibit & Address Owned Reference Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Block 3, Lot 5 C-12 c/o Charles M. Wesley (Agent - Effective 10/23/95) Parcel I.D. No. 7142 Kingstree Court 81880640007 Dublin, Ohio 43017 Phone: (614) 761-3142 Delnor Towers Unit Ten, Inc. Block 3, Lot 6. C-13 n/ida Delnor-Neptune Properties Unit No. i c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Parcel I.D. No. 159 South Main Street 81880680009 Akron, Ohio 44308-I 322 Phone: (216) 762-2411 Delnor Towers Unit Nine, Inc. Block 3, Lot 7, C-!4 c/o Frank Accorsi, President Unit No. 1 5500 Broadview Road Gahanna, Ohio 43230 Parcel I.D. No. Phone: (614) 475-2190 81880720008 Delnor Towers Unit Eight, Inc. Block 3, Lot 8, C-15 n/k/a Delnor-Neptune Properties Unit No. 1 c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Parcel I.D. No. 159 South Main Street 81880760000 Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 Phone: (216) 762-2411 Delnor Towers Unit Seven, Inc. Block 3, Lot 9. C-16 n/k/a Delnor-Neptune Properties Unit No. 1 c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Parcel I.D. No. 159 South Main Street 81880800009 Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 Phone: {216) 762-2411 Delnor Towers Unit Six, Inc. Block 3, Lot 10, C-17 n/ida Delnor-Neptune Properties Unit No. 1 c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Parcel I.D. No. 159 South Main Street 81880840001 Akron, Ohio 44308- ! 322 Phone: (216) 762-2411 12C 6 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COU.,ER COUP, COURmOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST RO. BOX 41304,4 NAPLES. FLORIDA 34101-3044 CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY CouRr Dwight E. Brock COUNTY RECORDER Clerk CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CORRECTED ~ January 27, 1998 Delnor Towers Unit Nine, Inc. c/o Frank Accorsi, President 5500 Broadview Road Gahanna, Ohio 43230 RE: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please disregard my letter of January 23, 1998, concerning Petition AV-96-001. The letter indicated that the hearing would be February 24, 1998 and the notice would be advertised on February 8 and February 15, 1998. This is incorrect. Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 22, 1998 and Sunday, March 1, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, y S. Kuehne, Deputy Clerk Enc 1. cc: Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Rich Yovanovich Delnor-Neptune Properties William B. Gest A.L. Dougherty Co. , Inc. James W. Elkins CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 I'AMIAMI mAIL EAST RO. BOX 413044 CIRCUIT COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 COUNTY COURT Dwight E. Brock COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CORJqJ~CTED ~ January 27, 1998 Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners c/o Charles M. Wesley 7142 Kingstree Court Dublin, Ohio 43017 RE: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please disregard my letter of January 23, 1998, concerning Petition AV-96-001. The letter indicated that the hearing would be February 24, 1998 and the notice would be advertised on February 8 and February 15, 1998. This is incorrect. Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 22, 1998 and Sunday, March 1, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, ~ehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. cc: A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc. Delnor Towers Unit Nine, Inc. Delnor-Neptune Properties Rich Yovanovich William B. Gest .... I i[ll[[[[l[m I III I I[ [ II [[[[I [[1[1[ I[I I [[[ [11 ............. mi ~ 11 [[[1 [ I County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLL,E" COUNr~ COURT"OUSE ~.o. ~ox ,,,3c~ c~cu~T COUNT NAPLES, FLORIDA ~101~ COUNTY COURT COUNJY ~ECO~DE~ D~i~bt ~. Brock CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COmmISSIONERS January 27, 1998 Rich Yovanovich Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A. 850 Park Shore Drive Trianon Center, Third Floor Naples, Florida 34103 RE: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please disregard my letter of January 23, 1998, concerning Petition AV-96-001. The letter indicated that the hearing would be February 24, 1998 and the notice would be advertised on February 8 and February 15, 1998. This is incorrect. Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 22, 1998 and Sunday, March 1, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Jody S. Kuehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. cc: Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Delnor Towers Unit Nine, Inc. Delnor-Neptune Properties William B. Gest A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc. James W. Elkins '" ii i~1 I IIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII III I III I IIIIIII ........ I 12g County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLL,ER COU.rV COUR~.OOSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAS~ .o. ~ox ~,3~ C,~CU~T cou~T NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101~ COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER Dwight E, Brock CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CO~~ L~ January 27, 1998 Delnor-Neptune Properties c/o Nickolas P. Andreeff, Esq. 6th Floor, Society Building Akron, Ohio 44308-1322 RE: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please disregard my letter of January 23, 1998, concerning Petition AV-96-001. The letter indicated that the hearing would be February 24, 1998 and the notice would be advertised on February 8 and February 15, 1998. This is incorrect. Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 22, 1998 and Sunday, March 1, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, ~uehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. cc: A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc. Delnor Towers Unit Nine, Inc. Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Rich Yovanovich William B. Gest 12£'6 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT cow~ couN~ coum~ .o..ox ~,~ CmCU~T COU~ N~L~S. ~LO~,OA ~,0,-~ COUNTY COURT COUNTY ~ECORDER Dwight E. Brock CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COM~ISSIONE~S CO~C~ L~ January 27, 1998 William B. Gucst 3900 Bramford Columbus, Ohio 43220 RE: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please disregard my letter of January 23, 1998, concerning Petition AV-96-001. The letter indicated that the hearing would be February 24, 1998 and the notice would be advertised on February 8 and February 15, 1998. This is incorrect. Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 22, 1998 and Sunday, March 1, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, ~Kuehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. cc: Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Delnor Towers Unit Nine, Inc. Delnor-Neptune Properties Rich Yovanovich A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc. James W. Elkins 12C County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLUER COUNTY COURTHOUS~ 3301 TAMIAMI IRAIL FAST P,O. BOX 413044 CIRCUIT COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER Dwight E. Brock CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CORRECTED ~ January 27, 1998 A.L. Dougherty Co., Inc. c/o James W. Elkins, Esq. James W. Elkins, P.A. 1000 Tamiami Trail North Suite 303 Naples, FL 33940 RE: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-96-001 Dear Petitioner: Please disregard my letter of January 23, 1998, concerning Petition AV-96-001. The letter indicated that the hearing would be February 24, 1998 and the notice would be advertised on February 8 and February 15, 1998. This is incorrect. Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 22, 1998 and Sunday, March 1, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Jody S. Kuehne, Deputy Clerk Encl. cc: Delnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners Delnor Towers Unit Nine, Inc. Delnor-Neptune Properties Rich Yovanovich William B. Gest Columbus, OMo 43220 ')~ Roetzel & ,~dress, ~zn~ire %' c/o'Stephen -. ~:o=pson: * Tri=on genter, Z~ird Floor 2~aples, Ylorid~~/9':3 ~: 7acation of the ~lat of 5/ig~ins ?ass _~n=s Uni% 1.7o. 1 Dear b[r. Thozpson: i~ as ;' _..-7..~ for .~etnor ?~nterprises Unit 11 ?artners~ e_~ h&':~! to co::7}3 wisk tl:e re~ues~ s~ated in iour le%~er ..... ', Consent to ~oin 3euteuber 1.5, 19~3. Therefore, a,.~c~.ed is our - the referenced ~lat. " .~' in ~' _ pro':o~ea petition to vacate . .: .f'. [....:[' ~ .... ~:"- t]: "-~"' :~est .... ~ .~ .... · -- td:c".hor, e r~-.-*-.~ e C . s subnit t[:e naces [-_n~i ..i2rezses c~ all ~:artners jenera~ --artners. co-7 cf the artnershzl'-~e reccrde~ December C u,.= on i'a~e ~ of Jo~2 ~ : ...e Co~!ier CountF, Florida. /ublic lie cords = - · - , ~ be of .... he!" in this Sincere!y ~, ~ yours . ., ' Uill~ '5. .,est, .~e:~ for ~:lnor ~6er[:rises Unit 11 i'arlne rs · -' ?,-.closures: Consent ?orr... List cf far;nets ,~' ~.a_,esses ............ ~m ~lll · ii II II I I I II II IIIIII IIIII III · *** 2305243 OR', 2408 PG: 1706 RI¢0IDID in 0HIClAL HC01DS of C0LLIII C0111TT, FL 04/13/H at 0~:46AII D~IG~ I. BR0Cl, CLIll RIC HI S.00 C0PIH 1.00 Naples Oai[y News ~t~: Naples, FL 339~O CLHI ~0 ~HI BOAD Affidavit of Publication IITIROHICl l/H ~L~R I ~ ~ - ~ NapLes Dairy Ne.s 19T 7~4~ ~ARD OF COUHTY COHHISSIONERS UOT*CEOF PUBLIC HEAmNG ATTH: HANCY SAL~U8 Notice Is hereby 91~n PO ~X ~13016 ~ ~e .B~rd of C~ I HAPLES FL 3~101-3016 ~m~su~rs d C~ er l ~n~, will h~d a public J hearing on TUESOAY, ~ ~ARCH ?~, ~, Jn the J mtn~s~ Buildlnq Col. ~ tier Cou~ Government Ce~er, ~30~ East Tomia. ~ REFEREHCE: ~1230 1011636106~91 mi Tro~l, ~o~les, Fordo. ~ 57~2658 t~TICE OF PUBLIC HEA The meeting wi' bean o~ ~ e:~ A.r~. The B~d w~l ' Consider ~etifinn 5tare of ~[orJd~ 6-001, Kenneth 8. Cuvier ~ County ot Collier I as agent f~ owners, Oel~ ~ nor-tdeptu~e Properties. ~ Before the u~ersigned authority, personally ~ Oeln~ Towers Un~ Nine, appeared B. Lamb, ~ho on oath says tha~ she servesl Inc., Oeln~ E~erDri~s Unit E/even P~ners as the Assistant Cor~rate Secretary of the Nap[esi A.L. Doughe~ Co., Inc., re~uestlng ~e v~ of Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, ~e Pl~ ~ Wiggins Pass in Collier County, FLorida: that the attach~ Lo~ing Unit No. 1 os re. c~d In Pl~ B~ 10, COpy of advertising was publish~ in said ~w 44, and Wiggins Pass newspaper on dates listed. Lo~ings Unit No. ) oddS- tiaa os receded in Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily B~k )0, Page 8~. oll o~ News is a news~per published at Naples, in said me P~lic Rec~ds of Col. liar C~, FI~i~. Collier County, Florida, a~ that the said All. interested P~le5; newspaper has heretofore been continuously ~e ~nvlfed to ~end register fo ~e~ on~ fo m' published in said Collier County, Florida, each submit their ~ie~i~s if I day and has been entered as second class ~iL any, in wrifln~ to ~he B~d prl~ to ~e Public ~tter at the ~st office in Naples, in said hemlng. Collier County, Florida, for a peri~ of 1 yea,' Any Per~n who decid. es to ~Oeol o ~cislon of next prec~ing the first publication of the ~e B~U will need a re- attached copy of advertisement; and affiant c~d of the Dr~eedln~ pe~olnlng thereto, and further says that she has neither paid ~r theref~e, ~V need ~ promised any person, firm or co,ration any ensure ~ot o discount, rebate, commission or refund for the ~s m~e, which reC~d In. pur~se of securing this advertisement for Ch{des ~e tesfl~v and ewde~e i~ ~ ch ~e publication in the said neuspaper. ~D~l is fo be ~d. fiOARo OF COUNT y PUBLISHED ON: 03/18 COMMISSIONERS COLL~E~, COUt~Zy FLORIDA ' BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. 8ROCK, CLERK Depu~ Clerk (SEAL) AD SP~C[: ~.~ INCH M~ch18,24 No. 117~65 ' FILE0 ON: 03/24/98 = ___~ ............................................................................... Signsture of Affiant S~orn ~o Bnd Subscribed before me this ' day of .', Personalty known by me ; / / / ': RESOI.UTION NO. 98- RESOLUTION FOR PETITION AV 96-001 TO VACATE TtlE PI.ATS OF WIG(;INS PASS LANDING UNIT NO. I AS RECORDED IN PI.AT BOOK lO, PAGE 44, AND WIGGINS PASS I.ANDINGSUNIT I ADDITION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK ~.o~,~_- IO. PAGE ill. Al.l, OF TIlE PtJBI.IC RECORDS OF CO[.I.IER COUNTY, FI.ORIDA. WI IEREAS, pursuant to Sections 177.101. Florida Statutes, Kenneth B. Cuylcr as agent for owners, Dclnor-Ncptune Properties, Delncr Towers Unit Nine, Inc., Dclnor Enterprises Unit Eleven Partners and A.L. Doughcrty Co., Inc., does hereby request thc vacation of the Plats of Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. I as recorded itl Plat Book I0, Page 44, and Wiggins Pass l.andings Unite No.l Adtlition as recorded itl Plat Book 10. Page 81. all of Ih¢ Public Records of Collier County. Florida; and WItEREAS, the Board has this day hckl a public bearing to consider vacation said plats as more fifily described below, and notice of said public hearing to vacate was given as required by law; and WI IE'REAS. thc granting of thc vacation will not adversely affect Ibc ownership of righ! of convenient access of olbcr property owners; and NOW. TtlERF. FORE. BE IT RESOI.VI'.'D BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSOF ('OIA. IER COLIN'FY, FI.ORIDA, Ihat thc lbllowing be hereby vacated: See Exhibit 'A' attached to and incorporated herein. BE IT FURTtlER RESOLVED. that thc Clerk is hereby directed to advertise Ibc adoption of this Resolution once in a paper of general circulation in thc Cot,nty witbin 30 days Ibllowing ils adoplion. BE IT FURTHER RESOI.VED. that the Clerk is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution. thc proof of publication of thc notice of public hearing, and the proof of publication of thc notice of adoption of lhis Resolution in thc Public Records of Collier County. Florida and to make proper notations of this vacation on said plat. This resolution adoptcd ;,tier motion, second and majority vote Favoring same this day of/,/ '-' ·" . 1098. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT Ii. BRO('K. Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Deputy Clerk ' / '~,~RB^~^ h. B~/; ~ii~ai~ Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: / Hcidi F. Asblon Assistanl County Altomcy RM/Im/121597 Reso AV ')6.oOI doc 12C'6t ~x~rr ";," BBLS ! o~ ~ · SURVEYORS & MAPPERS ~C. 14~$ OLD 41. SUITE 4 NAPLES, FLOR/DA 34110 TEt _WP_HONE: 94 I-~97-131 ~ 1AX: 941-597-$207 !.F-GA~ DESCRIPTION A~L OF WIG(~INS PASS LANDINGS UATI' NO. I ADDITION~ ACCORDING TO THE PLAT %/-IER.EOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10; AT PAGE gl OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS COLLI/!R COUNTY FLORDA, AND A!.r- OF WICK}INS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, AT PAG]~ 44 OF THE Pbq3LIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT TIlE V~'ESTERLY :$O.~ FEEl' C~ATER%VAY), BEING MORE PARTIC~Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNq[NG AT THE SOLrrHEAST CORNER OF LOT 4 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LA.'~DIGS LrNIT NO. i ADDITION; THENCE N.Igg~52~0'W. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE Ol~ SAD LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 599.96 ~ TO THE SOUTHWEST COKNER OF SAID LOT 4, THE SAME BEFNG THE SOI/I/4EAST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOC~ l OF SAiD W~GGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1; THENCE N. gg°$2~20"W. AIX)NG THE SOU/I{EKLY LINE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNqT NO. 1, A DISTANCE OF ~ 1~0.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST COKNER OF BLOCK 2, OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDFNGS UNIT NO. 1; THENCE N.00°I4'00"W. A DISTANCE OF I971.91 ~ TO A POINT ON ~ NOF,//-I]ERLY IiNE OF SAID Vv'IGGIlqS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. THENCE N.g7°48'00"E. ALONG SA/D NOP, THERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 14gl.48 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNEK OF LOT 3, BLOCK 3 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1; THEN~ S.02:I2~)0"E. A DISTANCE OF I63.77 ~ TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOC~ 3 OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LAI'~GS UNIT NO. I; THENCE N.g'P4g'00"E A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CO~ OF SAID LOT 1; THLCN~ S.02°I2~)0"E. ALONG/-HE EASTERLY L/NE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1, A DISTANCE OF 66&I6 FEET TO TH~ SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLCX~K ~ OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1, THE SAME BErNG THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT ~ OF SAiD WIC.~INS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1 ADDITION; THENCE S.02°12'00'~. ALONG THE EASTEKLY LINE OF SAID WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. ! ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 1209.93 FEE'F TO THE POINT OF BEGIIN%NING, PARCEL CONTAINS 7g.2g ACRES, MOPE OR LESS. (SEE ATTACHED ~CH) 2 f.x,~{ ~ ~ ;T "A" .~o~ 1 2 C 6 ,4~4~ OLD 41, SU1TE 4 NAPLES, FLORK)A ~110 ~ FPHO~: 941-~97-1315 F~: 941-597-5207 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL OY WIGGINS PASS LA~33~GS UNIT NO. 1 ~D~ON, AC~~G TO ~ PLAT ~OF ~~ ~ P~T ~K 10, AT PAOE 8I OF ~ P~MC ~CO~S OF COL~ ~~ ~~ ~ ALL OF ~~S P~ ~~GS ~ NO. 1, A~~G TO ~ PLAT ~F ~~ ~ P~T B~K l 0, AT PA~ ~ C7 ~ P~L{C ~CO~S OF CO~ CO~, ~O~A, LE~ ~ ~~ T~ ~Y ~ ~ET ~A~RWA~, ~G M0~ P~~Y D~~ ~ FO~WS: ~~GS ~ NO. 1 ~D~ON; ~~ N. 89°$2'20~w. ~ONG ~ SO~~Y ~ OF S~ ~T 4, A DIST~ OF ~99.9~ ~.~ TO ~ SO--ST CO~ OF ~ LOT 4, ~ ~ B~O ~ SO~ CO~ OF ~T I0, ~L~ 1 OF S~ ~~S P~ ~~gS ~ NO. 1; ~~ N.8~f2~0"W. ~NG ~ 11~.65 ~T TO ~ SO~T ~~ OF BLO~ % OF ~ ~~S P~S ~~GS ~ NO. 1; ~~ N.~°14'00'~. A DIST~CE OF 1971.91 F~T TO A ~ ON ~ NOR~Y ~ OF ~ ~~S P~S ~~GS ~ NO. I; ~~ N.8~4g00~. ~NG S,~ NOK~Y ~, A DISTanCE OF 1481.48 ~T T0 ~ NOR~ST CO~ OF ~T 3, BL0~ 3 OF S~ ~~S PASS ~~ ~ NO. I; ~~ S.02°12~. A D~T~ OF l~.~ ~ TO ~ NOR~~T ~~ OF LOT 1, B~ 3 OF ~ ~~S P~S ~~GS ~ NO. 1; ~~ N. gT=48'~ A DISTAN~ OF 200.00 ~T TO ~ NOR~AST CO~ OF S~ LOT 1; ~~ S.02°12'O0"E. ~NG ~ ~~Y~ OF S~ ~~S P~S ~~GS ~ NO. 1, A D~T~ OF ~8.16 ~ TO ~ SO~T ~ OF ~T 1, ~K i OF S~ WI~S PASS ~D~GS ~ NO. I, ~ S~ B~G ~ NOR~ST CO~N~ OF LOT 1 OF S~ ~3~S P~S ~~GS ~ NO. 1 ~D~ON; ~~ S.02°12~0~. ~ONO ~ ~S~Y ~ OF ~ ~~'S P~S M~GS ~ NO. I ~D~ON, A DI~~ OF I2~.93 ~T TO ~ ~ O~ B~~O, P~ ~~S 78~8 A~S, MO~ OR ~SS. I EXHIBIT "A" ' 120-6 BF. AR~GS RA';rER, TO WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT NO. 1 ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREDF RECO~ IN PLAT BOOK 10, AT PAGE 81 OF THE PUBLIC RECOP, DS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THIS PROPI~TY IS SUD~ TO ~NTS, KESF~VATIONS, OR REST~CTIONS OF RECORD. (SEE: ATTA~-~. D SKET~I) I 2 ""' 12C" 6 PLAT OF WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS, UNIT NO. 1 AND PLAT OF WIGGINS PASS LANDh-NGS, UNIT NO. 1 ADDrrlON Exh/bit "B" °' " *** 2305245 OR: 2408 PG: 1717 ..~les D. tb, .e,,s RICORD~D ia OUICI~ UCORD$ of COLLIU COU~L ~L ,apres, ~L 339~O 04/13/98 at 09:4~ DJI~T !. BiOC[, CLIRK Affidavit of Pubttcatt~ ~[C fll 6.00 Naples Daily News C0~[lS 1.00 ................................................................ l~tn: .......... I~TIR0~ICl 4TH FLOOR ~ARD OF COUNTY CO~MISSiONERS 1ST 7240 ATTN: NANCY SAL~UB Po ~x 413016 0110 NOTICE OF A~TION N~ is h~e~ glv~ REFERENCE: ~1230 ~ on ~e 2a~ ~ ~ ~ch, 19~, ~ ~d ~ S?~7Gq NOTICE OF ADOPT[OH N C~ Commlssi~ers ~ Collier Coup, FI~I~, State of Florida ~ted R~ re Petition AV-96-001 COUnty of Collier pursuant fo Before the undersigned authority, personally 177.101. F~I~ Ken~ B. Cuvier, o$ appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves ~ f~ o~r$. De)~- N~ne ~, Del- as the Assistant Cat.rate Secretary of the Naples ~ T~ers Unff Nine, ~. D~ily Uews, a dalky newspaper pubklsl~ed at Naples, ~i~ E~erprl~s Un~ Eleven Po~er$ ~ A.L. in Collier County, Florida: that the attached ~ghe~ ~o, I~., copy of advertising was published in said ~estl~e v~ ~ newspaper on dates listed ~ Pl~ of Wl~l~ · Lo~l~ UnH No. 1 o$ re. Affiant further says that the said Nap[es Daily c~ In PI~ ~ 10, News is a newspaper publish~ at Naples, in said P~ 44 o~ Wl~ins Londl~ Un~ No. I A~I- Collier County, Fl. oride, and that the said fl~ m rec~d in PI~ newspaper has heretofore been continuously P~lic Rec~ds ~ C~ller published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been enter~ as second class mail Re~l~ ~-84 m~ ~ view In ~e ~lce ~ eat:er at the ~st office (n UapLes, ~n said ~e Cle~ ~ ~e Collier County, FLorida, for a per~ of 1 year Mi~ & R~ ~, ~ FI~, A~ next preceding the first publication of the ministration Bu Idlng ettach~ copy of advertisement; and affiant Collier C~ Oovern~ ~ Ce~er, 3~1 E~t further says that she has neither paid nor Tomloml Trail, N~les, FI~I~ promised any person, firm or co,ration any BOARD OF COUNTY discount, feb):e, commission or refund for the COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, uurpoa~ ot :ecur%ng thio advertisement for FLORA pubt(cat(~ in the said news~per. BAEBARA ~. BERRY, CHAIE~N DWIGHT E. PUBLISHED ON: 04/02 C~RK BY: /s/ EII~ ~, AO SPACE: 49.0OO INCH FILED ON: 04/02/98 ................................................... e ........................... Signature of Affiznt __ ; · , ~ ......... Suorn to and Subscribed before me this .... d~y of ._--.~' : 19~~' Personally known by .~e __~_ ,' ~ ' '/ ~_} ~' ----~' ..... . .,., / (including this cover) !!i111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 TO: LOCATION: NAPLES DAXLY NE%~S FkX NO.: 263-4864 COM}{ENTS: ) / !!1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 FROM: ELLIE HOFFMAN -MINUTES & RECORDS ~-i LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX t~O: (813) 774-8408 , PHONE 'NO: (813) 77z,-8406 5~ O0° 02' 02 1068C~m 161 at~ sent: ..)./~/ J.' Time NapLes Oai ly News ~pLe., FL 33944~ 1 2C 7 Affidavit of Publication ~apLes Daily News TO COHSIOF-R BOARD OF COUNTY COflNISSIONERS O~DINANC~ NOT~CE Of:: C. ONSI~)EF?.: attN: NANCY SALC~OB t,O. , Po 8OX 413016 THE COLUER N OR / NAPLES FL 34101-3016 WATERDiNA~IGA~TO ~IBI~/-'~/ ~YDAY ~ ] ~ / REFERENCE: ~1230 ~210125 WATER-SEWER~,,,,m_Dl~'/ 5765~201 ~TICE OF INTENT TO ~ ~ ~ ARIES O State of Florida TRICT: OTHER GEOGeAPH~ C~nty of Collier ~S ~ Before the u~erstg~ eut~rity, ~rs~eLty RA~ ~G_~ ~ F ~ ~EA a~ear~ A~eLa Bryant, ~ ~ ~th says that she RE~GCTIVE serves as Assistant Secretary of the Nap[es 0airy ~GNA~ ~ AN Nevs, a daily navstar ~bLtsh~ at Naples, in RIGATION RES~)~o ~ BY RE~u~ON Collier C~nty, FLorida: that the attach~ ¢~y OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM~I~ION- of advertJsJ~ was ~bLish~ in said n~s~per ~ ~S ~ A ~.1~ Affiant further says that the said Nap[es Daily DEFINITIONS; PROVID- ING WA~ ~RIGATION Heys is a n~spaper ~bLJsh~ at Naples, in said HO~ pROHIbITIONS; Collier C~nty, FLorida, a~ t~t the said ~GNATING ~E ~O ne~s~pe~ has heretofore been contin~usty ED GEOG ~bLish~ tn said Coltter County, Flortda, each EXE~PTIONS~; ~OV1DINGANDF~ day a~ has been enter~ as sec~ class ~iL VARIANCE PROCE- .tter at the ~,t office in NapLea, in slid ~[ Co~LJer C~nty~ F[orJda~ for a perJ~ of ~ year OF WATER UTILITY next prec~J~ the ftrst ~bLJcatJ~ of the ~v~ F~ R~- attech~ c~y of ~vertJsement; ~ affiant ~ ~TIONS-BYE~ further says that she has neither ~id ~r ~; ~OVIOING F~ EN proais~ any parse, firm or c~ratt~ any FORCE~ENT ANE disco~t, re~te, c~isai~ or refu~ for the FOR CONFLICT lNG FOE I ~blJcatJ~ Jn the said n~s~r. INTO THE COUNTY'S ~ o~ ~w aN~- DINANCE$; ~ND PUBLZSHED ON: 03/~ VIDING FOR AD SPACE: 118.~ [NC~ ~e ~lt be~ FZLEO ~: 03/~/98 ~E~AY, ~CH~ County CommiSsioners ~ East Tomloml S~orn to and Subscrib~ before ~ th~s /D day of//.~ 1~ Tmr~ ~ OF COUNTY ~LLIER COUNTY, BARBARA 8, BERRY, CHAIR~Ig 12C 7' February 26, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider the Collier County Water Irrigation Ordinance Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, March 8, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Charge to 408-210125 NOT1CE O1: INTENT T0 (iONS II)ER OR[)INANCE NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION/ADOPTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER IRRIGATION ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT WATER IRRIGATION EVERY DAY BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 10:00 A.M. AND 4:00 P.M. WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT AND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE GOODLAND WATER DISTRICT; ALSO WITHIN OTHER GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OF UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY IF AND WHEN THE RESPECTIVE AREA IS DESIGNATED AS AN IRRIGATION RESTRICTED AREA BY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AFTER A PUBLIC HEARING; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING WATER IRRIGATION HOUR PROBHIBITIONS; DESIGNATING THE TWO IMMEDIATELY AFFECTED GEOGRAPHIC AREAS; PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTIONS AND VARIANCE PROCEDURES; PROVIDING FOR POSSIBLE TERMINATION OF WATER UTILITY SERVICE FOR REPEATED VIOLATIONS BY THE SAME PERSON OR ENTITY; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT AND PENALITIES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION INTO THE COUNTY'S CODE OF LAW AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The Board of County Commissioners proposes to adopt an ordinance relating to the procedures for the regulation of irrigation. A Public Hearing on this Ordinance will be held on TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3"* Floor, Building F, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are available for public inspection in the Office of the Clerk to the Board, Building F, 4'h Floor, Records and Minutes, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. All questions pertaining to this Ordinance should be directed to the Water Director, Water Department Administrative Office located at the Collier County Government Center, Health Building, Third Floor, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. If requested during the Notice period, written comments filed with the Water Director prior to March 24, 1998 will be read and considered at the Public Hearing. BARBARA B. BERRY, CttA1RHAN Db/IGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/ Ellio lloffman, Deputy Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 9~'- TIlE COI.I,IER COUNTY WATER IRRIGATION ORDINANCE: TO PROlllBIT WATER IRRIGATION EVERY DAY BETWEEN Tile llOURS OF I0:00 A.M. AND 4:00 P.M. WITItlN TIlE BOUNDARIES OF TIlE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT AND THE BOUNDARIES OF TttE GOODI.AND WATER DISTRICT; ALSO WITItlN OTllER GEOGRAPtlIC AREAS OF UNINCORPORATED COI.I,IER COUNTY IF AND WtlEN THE RESPECTIVE AREA lS DESIGNATED AS AN IRRIGATION RESTRICTED AREA BY RESOLUTION OF TIlE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AFTER A PUBLIC IIEARING; PROVIDING PURPOSE; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING XVATER IRRIGATION ItOUR PROIllBITIONS; DESIGNATING THE TWO IMMEDIATELY AFFECTED GEOGRAPillC AREAS; PROVIDING FOR EXEblPT1ONS AND VARIANCE PROCEDURES; PROVIDING FOR POSSIBLE TERMINATION OF WATER UTILITY SERVICE FOR REPEATED VIOLATIONS BY TIlE SAME PERSON OR ENTITY; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION INTO TIlE COUNTY'S CODE OF I.AWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WIlEREAS, Chapter 125, Florida St~tutes. (County Government) authorizes the Board of County Conlmissioners to enact those regulations necessary for the health, safety and v.'ctfare of irc citizens and visilors of Collier County; and XVIIEREAS, thc South Florida Water Management District has requested, to assist wilh the need to conserve water, that all Count),' and City Governments adopt an Ordinance that prohibits irrigalion by water during day-time hours, and WlIEREAS. thc Board of County Commissioners agrees with the request made to it by the South Florida Water Management District; and WIIEREAS, Irc population growth of Collier County has placed and continues IO place increasing dcrl~:lnds oil lhc water resources of thc County; and WI IEREAS, it is thc intent of tire Board of County Commissioners of Collier Counly to ensure irc continued hcahh, safety, welfme, and quality of life for the existing and future residents and visitors to Collier Count.,,' by conser¥ing the County's water resources; and WIIICREAS. Iris Ordinance docs trot apply within the city limits of any municipal corporation. NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TilE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COI.I.IER COUNTY FI.ORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: TITLE AND CITATION. I.I This Ordinance shall be known as and cited as "The Collier County Water rrrigation Ordinance." SECTION TWO: FINDINGS, Thc Board of County Commissioners hereby ma~cs thc Following findings: 2.1 That irrigation by water during thc hours of 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. increases water loss to evaporation and reduces the beneficial usc of thc County's water resources; 2.,7. That adopting an Ordinance to limit ir~gation between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. should also raise publ{c awareness and promote conservation of water; and 2.3 That restricting inigation during the hours of I0:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. will not create a hardship for residents of Collier County. SECTION TIIREE: PURPOSE. 3.1 The primary purpose ortho this Ordinance is to conscrvc water. SECTION FOUR: DEFINITIONS. Thc following definitions shall apply within this ordinance: 4.1 A:riculture. Thc growing of farm products including, but not limited to. sugar cane, vegetables, citrus and other fruits, pasture land, sod or nursery stock including and not limited to ornamental foliage and greenhouse plants. 4.2 County. The Board of County Commissioners and Ex-Officio the Governing Board of Irc Collier County Water-Sewer and Goodland Water Districts. 4.3 Code Enforcement Officer. Any authorized agent or employee of the County ,,,.'hose duty it is to enforce County codes. Employees or agents who may be dcsifi,mated as Code Enforcement Officers, for the purposes of this Ordinance may include and are not limited to: La'.,,' Enforcement Officers, Code Enforcement Director, Code Enforcement Supervisors. Code Enforcement Investigators, ;md Code Enforcement Compliance Investigator for Revenue Sen'ices. 4.4 Count.,,' Water-Sewer District. Thc service boundaries of this District are and shall be a specified in Collier Co '~ty Water-Sewer District, Special Act Chapter 88-499. Laws of Florida, as now exists or is hereafter amended. 4.5 Goodland Water District. The service boundaries of this District are and shall be as established in Goodland Water District, Ordinance No. 80-43, as now or hereafter amended, or its successor ordinance in function, if any. 4.6 Impervious. Impervious surfaces are those which do not allow for efficient penetration of water. Such surfaces include paved roads and paved ,,'chicle parking surfaces. cement sidewalks, paved driveways, and areas covered with highly compacted shell or clay. Excluded arc properly functioning pervious parking areas and similar areas. 4.7 Irrigation. Application of water from surface water or ground ,,valor sources or aquifers. 4.8 Irrigation Systems. Equipment and devices that deliver water to plains, grass, or foliage being irrigated. These include and arc not limited to pipelines, control structures, pipes. 12C 7 ditches, pumping stations, cmittcrs, valves, and fittings. Excluded are facilities that merely transfer v.'ater through water management systems from one location to another. 4.9 Person. Includes any natural person, and individual, any public or private corporation, firm, association, joint venture, p,'~nership, municipality, governmental agency, political subdivision, public officer, or any other entity whatsoever, or any combination of such, jointly or severally. 4.10 Water Resources. Surface and ground water sources and aquifers. 4.11 Water Utility. Sep,'ice. Water that is provided to a customer by a public utility or a private utility. SECTION FIVE: IRRIGATION IIOUR PROItIBITIONS. 5.1 All landscape irrigation by water within any part of the areas and boundaries described below (Irrigation Restricted Area:;) in Section Six of this ordinance and which are not in the specific instances exempted by application of Section Seven of this Ordinance, is prohibited every day at all times between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. SECTION SIX: IRRIGATION RESTRICTION AFFECTED AREAS. 6.1 Upon the effective date of this Ordinance the irrigation restrictions apply immediately to landscape irrigation within the boundaries of the Collier County Water-Sewer District and within thc boundaries of the Goodland Water District. 6.2 The provisions oflhis Ordinance shall become applicable to othe~ geographic area of unincorporated Collier County if and when the respective geographic area is classified by Resolution of thc Board of County Commissioners as a water irrigation restricted area which may include areas that arc provided irrigation water by private utility water sen'ice. Thc Board shall hold a public hearing before adopting each such Resolution. 6.3 No provision of this Ordinance shall apply within any geographic area in thc City of Naples or any other municipal corporation. SECTION SEVEN: EXEMPTION; VARIANCE PROCEDURES. 7.1 Thc follov;ing activities shall be exempt from thc provisions of this Ordinance: 7.1.1 Landscape irrigation by hand-watering provided a person is at all such times manually operating the watering device, such as a nozzle that shuts offautomatically when not held open by hand. 7.1.2 Landscape irrigation by systems from which the sole source of v,'ater is treated wastewater effluent. 7.1.3 Very short-term operation of an irrigation system for rcs(lng system repair and maintenance. 7.1.4 Flushing water mains that is required for normal water mare clearance ar.d maintenance or for maintenance of water quality; however, ,.,,'here practical, contractors and utilities shall direct such fl:lshcd water into 12C pervious areas, shall flush al the minimum rate ncccssar), for cleaning, and shall disperse the water in such a manner so as to benefit adjacent vegetation. 7.1.5 Landscape irrigation for purposes of watering in fungicides, insecticides and herbicides as required by the manufacturer of the product or by federal or Florida laws. This exemption applies only to licensed pest control operators and is limited to the amounts of water recommended by the manufacturer's recommendations for watering in the product. 7.1.6 Landscape irrigation for watering in newly planted grass and foliage during the first foray-five (45) days after initial planting. 7.1.7 Agricultural irrigation provided that specific irrigation has then been permitted by a consumptive or water use permit issued by the Soulh Florida Water Management District. 7.2 Any person ,,,,'hose irrigation is prohibited by this Ordinance may make application to the County Water Director for a variance from the restriction if full compliance with this Ordinance is imposing or will impose a unique, unnecessary and inequitable hardship on such applicant. Relief by variance may be granted only if the applicant can prove that such hardship is peculiar to that person or that affected property, that the hardship is not self-imposed, and that the granting of the variance would be consistent with the general intent and purpose of this Ordinance. Any application for variance shall be hand delivered or mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested. 7.2.1 The County's Water Director is the individual who shall grant or deny variances for irrigation activities that utilize water provided by the County Water/Sewer District or the Goodland Water District. The County's Water Director shall render a decision on the respective variance request within ten ti0) working days after receipt ora complete application for a variance. If a variance request is not granted in whole or in part that decision may be appealed by the applicant to thc Public Works Administrator within five (5) work days of receipt of the Water Director's decision. Thc Public Works Administralor shall render a decision on the decision of thc Water Director within ten (10) working days after receipt of thc appeal. 7.2.2 An application for variance and/or thc granting of a variance shall operate prospectively only and shall not, therefore, affect any then pending enforcement action against the property owner pursuant to thc provisions of this Ordinance or othe~'ise. 7.3 Should the Board of County Commissioners extend the p:ovisions of this Ordinance to any other areas (which shall be in unincorporated Collier County only), the County Administrator shall designate a County staff representative who will be delegated the 12C ? responsibilities to act on behalf of thc County to approve or disapprove variance requests within any such designated area{s). That individual may be the County's Water Director. SECTION EIGHT: AUTtiORITY TO TERMINATE WATER UTILITY SERVICE. 8.1 The County may terminate water service to any customer of the County Water. Sewer District or Goodland Water District, or any other end use water customer of the County anywhere in the unincorporated County if that customer uses water for irrigation supplied by the County for irrigation and that customer fails to fully comply with two (2) warnings of any violation of the same provision or any other provision of this Ordinance. Such water service should not be restored until those sec'ice connection(s) are brought into compliance with this Ordinance or the applicant receives a waiver from lhe County Water Director or other designee of the County Administrator appointed pursuant to subsection 7.3, above. SECTION NINE: ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES. 9.1 The penalties for uncontested violations of this Ordinance shall be one hundred dollars ($100.00) for the first offense, two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) for the second offense, and four hundred dollars ($400.00) for the third offense. Each person ~'ho, or entity that, contests any violation of this Ordinance is thereby subject to a civil fine of up to five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each contest. Citations for violation of this Ordinance may be issued pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 97-35 (the Citation Ordinance). Violations of this Ordinance may be enforced under Chapter 162 or § 125.69, Florida Statute& or under ~ 1-6 of the County's Code of Laws and Ordinances. No person shall be incarcerated for any violation of this Ordinance except as may be ordered by a judge because of direct contempt ofcourl. 9.1.I Each separate day that there is a any violation of lhis Ordinance by thc same person or entity shah constitute a separate offense. 9.1.2 All fines collected pursuant to this Ordinance shall be used by the Code Enforcement Dcparm~cnt to fund enforcement of this Ordinance arieL:or other County Ordinances. SECTION TEN: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Ordinance shall bc liberally construed to effectively carD. out its purposes in the interest of public health and to protect the ,,vatcr resources of Collier County. if any section, phrase, sentence or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held invalid or unconstitt, tional by an.,,' court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. SECTION El. EVEN: INCLUSION IN TilE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. Thc provisions of this Ordinance shall become and bc made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. SECTION TWELVE: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this __ day of ,199__. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGttT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By:. Deputy Clerk TIMOTItY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Atlomey h ordmancesqT',w atenm gatmnord.tcp ! 1/19/97 III II IIIIIIIII III II IIIIIII I I IIII ..... Illl I II .................... II 1 5 1 REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IIEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Plea.~ place the following as a: XXX Normal legal Advertisement [] Oilier: (Display Adv.. location, etc.) Petition No. (If none. give brief description): Vo97-18 Petitioner: (Name & Address): Kratl C0nstnJct on Company.', 2606 S. Horr, cshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34 Name & Address of any person(s) to bc notified by Clerk's Off'icc: (If more space is needed, attach separate shc':r~ Robert L. Duane, Hole, Montes & Associates, !nc., 715 Tenlh Slreet South, Naples, FL 34102 Hearingbcfore Bce XXX BZA Other Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News Other [] Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Petition No. V-97-18, Robert L. Duane of Hole, Montes & A .s.5ociates, Inc., representing Kraft ConstnJction Compnv, requesting_, a 3.5 foot variance from Ihe required side setback of 13.5 feet Io 10 feet on both Iht east and west side yards for property located al 7606 South Horseshoe Drive, further described as Lot 6, Easl Naples lndusiriai park, Replat I, in Section 3:5, Township 49 South, Range 2:5 East. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cosl7 ~Yes [] No If Yes. what account should be charged for advertising costs: ] 13-138323-6491 I0 Reviewed by: Division Head Date County Manager Date List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating perT.,on to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessa~' legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submittinR to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office. retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: .. (inc~ud~nc~ ~ cover) liliiliiliilllllli[llllllllilillliilllliili'iiillllilillllliliil FROH s ELLXE HOF~ - lq'rNUZ'ES & RECORDS I " I~A~XON: Collier County C0urtho~se :' FAX U6.' (8131 774-8408 P~ONE'NO.' (813) 774-8406 JOe8C~~.4l J 619 ] $2-02 12:29 88 01 54 92634864 . February 2, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition V-97-18 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, March 8, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 800551 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, MARCH 24,1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition V-97-18, Robert L. Duane, of Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc., representing Kraft Construction Company, requesting a 3.5 foot variance from the required side setback of 13.5 feet to 10 feet on both the east and west side yards for property located at 2606 South Horseshoe Drive, further described as Lot 6, East Naples Industrial Park, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. All interested parties are invited to attend, to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board prior to the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) February 2, 1998 Kraft Construction Company 2606 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition V-97-18 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure February 2, 1998 Mr. Robert L. Duane Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. 715 Tenth Street South Naples, FL 34102 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition V-97-18 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, ~4arch 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure RESOLUTION NO. 98- RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER V-97-18, FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 3.5-foot variance from the required side setback of 13.5 feet to 10 feet on both the east and west side yards as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in an "I" zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition V-97-18 filed by Robert L. Duane of Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc., representing Kraft Construction Company, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Lot 6, East Naples Industrial Park, Replat 1, as recorded in Plat Book 17, Pages 38 ~ 39, of the Public Records ~f Collier County, Florida be and the same hereby is approved for a 3.5-foot variance from the required side setback of 13.5 feet to 10 feet on both the east and west side yards as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", of the zoning district wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: The variance is only the 3.5 foot side yard encroachment as depicted on the attached plot plan. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V-97-18 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of , 1998. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, Chairman Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Marjor(te M. Student Assistant County Attorney f/ V-97-18 RESOLUTION / / / / \ ~ I ~' ~ $. HORSESHOE OOURT ', ~~ ~''~--- _ I 40 20 0 40 I I SCALE FEET SCALE: 40' I I I II I I ~, / ~ I I I ~ I "' '~' NO T PLA TTED ASPHALT · '" . ' CONCRETE , ,, I I II I II II I I III I III IIIII I I m · ' Naples, FL 33940 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily flays NOTICE I~OARD OF CO~TY COflMISSIO~ERS ATTF~: NANCY SAL~ PO ~X ~1~16 REFERENCE: ~12~ ~51 576~70 t~T~CE OF P~L[C HEA State of ~[ori~ D~, ~ ~e, ~ & C~ty of Collier I ~ Kr~ C~ e~sr~ A~eLe Bry~t, ~ ~ ~th says that ~he se~ves as AssJst~t Secretary of the flapLes Daily Collier C~nty, FLorida'. that the attech~ c~y of ~verttst~ uae ~Ltshed in saJd n~s~per dates Ltst~. ~w~ p~k. ~ ~t~ Affiant further says that the said ~pLes DaiLy fl~s is a n~s~r ~tJsh~ at NapLes, tn said C~,F~ CoLLier C~nty, FLorida, a~ that the said me ~v~ to ~e~. n~spaper has heretofore been c~ttn~usLy r~st~ ~ ~ ~ to ~bLish~ in said Collier C~flty, FLorida, each day a~ has ~en enter~ es sec~ c~ass ~iL ~d ~1~ m ~e ~ub~lc ~tter at the ~st office in NapLes, in said CoLLier C~nty, FLori~, for a peri~ of 1 year attach~ copy of advert~s~ent; a~ affiant ~ pe~olnl~ further says that she has ne~t~er pa~d ~r proe~s~ any pers~, ~re or c~rat~ any r~ d~scount, rebate, c~ss~on or refund ~or the ,Is ~e, whlch rec~d In- p~r~se of secur~ th~s advert~semeflt for ev~e publication ~n the sa~d n~spaper. BOARD OF COUNTY COM~ISSIONE~5 COLL~E~ PUBLISHED 0~l: 0~/~ FLORA DWIGHT E. B~OCK, CLERK FILED OU: 03/~/98 Sworn to and Subscrib~ before me this ~ day of,,,",~/ I ' RESOLUTION NO. 98- 89 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER V-97-18, FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly electeu constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 3.5-foot variance from the required side setback of 13.5 feet to 10 feet. on both the east and west side yards as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in an "I" zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition V-97-18 filed by Robert L. Duane of Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc., representing Kraft Construction Company, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Lot 6, East Naples Industrial Park, Replat 1, as recorded in Plat Book 17, Pages 38 & 39, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida be and the same hereby is approved for a 3.5-foot variance from the required side setback of 13.5 feet to 10 feet on both the east and west -1- side yards as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", of the "I" zoning district wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: The variance is only the 3.5 foot side yard encroachment as depicted on the attached plot plan. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V-97-18 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done._~his ~/~z~ day of ~~_· , 1998. A~ST: .' % BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E.~ BRocK;"~Clerk COLLIER COUNTY,.,FLORIDA / ,~ ..:'.. '/ J .~BARBARA B. BERRY, Chairman Approved as t.o' Form and Legal Sufficiency: MarjorCle M. Student Assistant County Attprney f/ V-97°18 RESOLUTION Attest a~ to Chairman's s~gnatur~ only. -2- · ~---- 1~ 1 / / \ / / ',...~--- -- .~---- / / -- ~. ~o~~o~ coo~ ', ~~ ....... ~(~ Xx / '~ ~. ,~ ~ 40 20 0 L I SCALE FEET SCALE: = 40' I I I III I I ¢.~. I I I ~ I ~ ~ ''~' NOT PLA TTED ASPHALT ° REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to thc Board: Plca.~ place the following as XXX Normal lcgM Advertisement [] Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dept./Div: Comm. Dev. Serv./Planning Person: (~ ~ Date: c,~ ..5-.~'~" Pcfition No. (lf none, give brief desctiption): ~U-92-16(1) Petitioner: (Name & Address): gQmmunitv Do'el0pment & Environmental ,Sen'ices Division, 2~;00 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naole$~ Florida 3.* Name & Address of any per~n(s) to be notified by Clcrk's Office: (If more space is needed, attacb separate sheet'} Heatingbeforc BCC XXX, BZA , OIhcr Newspaper(s) Io be used: (Complclc only if i,npoflant): XXX Naples Daily' Ncws Other [] Legally Rcquircd Proposed Text: (Include Icgal description & common location & Size: Petition No. CU-92-16(I), Community Dcvcl0pmcnt and Environmental ,~g:rviccs Divisi.0_n~rcprc$en. tin. ~ the Collier County Board of County Commissioners rcquestin~ the deletion of Condition 'c' as contained in Resolntign Number 93-129, xvhicb approved CU-92-16. for properly located on the sonth side of U.S. · I. I, one mile west of S.R. 29, in Scc!ions 26, & 27, To,,vn.ship .'52 South, Ranee 29 East, consisting of 1,016 acres, more or less. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed bearing datc: Docs Pctition Fcc include advertising cost.'? [] Yes [] No If Yes. what account should be charged for advertising costs: 113.138323-6-g9110 Reviewed by: Approved by: Lisl Altacbmcnls: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. Forhearln~shefiJreBCCorBZA: Initiating person lo complete one coy and obtain Divisl°n Head approval before submittinglto County' Manager. Note: ifleRaldocument is involved, be sure that any necessar?'leRal review, orrequest for same, is submitted to County Attorney befnre submitting to County Manager. The Manager's oH'ice will dlstribule copies: [] County' Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Otber heatings: Initialing Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office. retaining a cop.,,' for file. Date Rcccivcd: ~ Datc of Public beating: Dale Advcrtiscd: .. (including this cover) !ii!ili11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 LOCATION: ~S DALLY ~S F~ ~O.: 263-48~ 1111111111111111111111111111I!!11111111111111111111111111111111 FROM: ELLIE HOFFMAN - MINUTES & RECORDS LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX NO: (813) 774-8408 PHONE'NO: (813) ,,,~ ~ 02-23j 10:58 8~'01'52 [92634864 OK Date sent:,~_,~.- / ~ Time sent: 2 February 23, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition CU-92-16(1) Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, 14arch 8, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 800551 13A 2 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition CU-92-16(1), Community Development and Environmental Services Division representing the Collier Cou~%ty Board of County Commissioners requesting the deletion of Condition "c" as contained in Resolution Number 93-129, which approved CU-92-16, for property located on the south side of U.S. 41, one mile west of S.R. 29, in Sections 26 & 27, Township 52 South, Range 29 East, consisting of 1,016 acres, more or less. All interested parties are invited to attend, to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board prior to the public hearing. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) , ~, I II Illl II II I -- II III I II III II IIII I III I .... 2 February 23, 1998 Mr. Fred Reiscl Current Planning Community Development & Environmental Services Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition CU-92-16(1) Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, March 8, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure RESOLUTIO:: 9~- A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RECREATiONAi, FACILITIES CO~iDITIONAL USE Ill THE A-ACSC/ST ZO~IiNG DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2.2.3 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPME~iT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTh' OF THE U.S. ~41 RIGHT-OF-WAY, CONSISTING OF 1,016 ACRES MORE OR LESS, IN SECTIONS 26 & 27, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND SUPERCEDING RESOLUTION NUMBER 93-129. WHEREAS, the I.egislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance Ho. 9i-!02) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 1993 the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals approved Petition CU-92-16 which granted Conditional Use approval for the property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Env[ronmenta! Advisory Board has ~umber 93-129 which requires the Petitioner to submit bird surveys; and WHEREAS, ir. approving this Resolution, it is the intent of the Collier County ~oard of Zoning Appeals to delete Condition "c" and thereb}' remove the reuuirement for submission of bird surveys; and WHEREAS, the Cc!liar Count7 Planning Co~nission, hain} the duly appointed and ccns%ituted plannin} ~oard for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations male and provided, and has considered the advisability sf Conditional Use 23 of Section 2.2.2.3 in an '~A" Rural Agricultural 1}A 2 'zone for a sporting and recreational camp including airboat tours, on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory provision and arrangement been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and 9iHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity tc be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. HOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida that: The petition filed by Mitchell D. and Teresa E. House, d/b/a Everglades Private Airboat Tours and Collier Enterprises, owaer, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Al! the property south of the U.S. 41 right-of-way, consisting of 1,0!6 acres, more or less, and located in Sections 26 & 27, Township 52 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use "23" of the A- ACSC/ST zoning district for recreational facilities in accordance with the Conceptual I.!aster Plan (E:<hibit "B") and subject to the following conditions: a. The Planning Services Manager may approve minor changes ia the location, siting, cr heigh~ of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the conditional use. Ezpansion of the uses identified an! approved within this conditional use application, cr major changes to the site plan submitted as par~ of ~his application, shall require the sutmitta! of a new conditional use a!?!icatian, and shall comply with al' applicable County or~inan~es in effect at the tir. e of submittal, inc!udin7 Di'.'i3ien 3.3, Site D_.elo~.,=..~=,' ~'---- Plan Review and approval, cf the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinanre No. 9i-102). b. This project shill be ~"~red to meet all Count'.' Ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. c. At the time cf pri'.'ate alrkcat tour operation com. m~nc~m~t t~.~ ~'~-~r shall install and malntai:'. no trespassing signage a!o?.s the entire property line every 300± yards. The entire property shall be uui!ized specifically for cor~.ercia! conservation/ecological tours. There shall be no other permitted uses associated with this conditional use. 2 d. ?he applicant shall utilize ezisting airboat trails in a round tri? me.'.hod according to the proposed existing trails [dentified on the aerial submitted on February 10, i993. e. ?_.rmits or letters of exemption from the U.S. Arm}' Corps of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation and the South Florida Water Management District shall be presented prior to the issuance of a final site deve!cpment plan approval. f. Prior to final site development plan approval the applicant shall submit to Project Plan Review Environmental Staff for review and approval a Wetland Mitigation and Enhancement Plan. This plan shall include compensator5' measure:~ to offset the wetland impacts on at least an e?~]a! area basis (Collier County Growth Management Plan - Cc~ns,-..r';at'ion and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.2.7). ~':'i~>r t~ the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy al! e×oti..; ';eqetaticn as defined by the County Land Deve!c~ment C~<le ~:hall ?',e rems'zed at a minimum of fifty (50) foot buffer :'rom the approved final site development plan ~i~'.·,,]o[~m,:,::t fc',c,t!,:-int, q'i%e fifty (50) foot buffer area arid all developed areas shall be maintained free of e:<ctic vegetation (Collier County Land Development Code Section 2.2.24.7.4.18) . b.. Upon issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the building permit ~s subject to a forty-five (45) day appeal period by the Florida Department of Cor,~munity Affairs· '.'k.'~ .:;etitio.-.er skal! assist and work 'with the applicable 3t~:t~. a:.~! fcderai a~encler ~i.e., U.S. Fish and Wildlife £-~:-.".ce, F!cri[{a G-%me and Fresh Water Fish Com~T, issicn, fete. ) ~c !;r.'..F.'~re base llne en';ironmen%al studies. j. The airboats shall only be equipped with non-aircraft er, sines including spark arrestors and properly muffled to re,d'.],?e the noise as much as possible. k. Airbcats shall be limited to a maximum length cf eighteen ~'l~ f .... t a::~! n~ more than ten I0) people aboard, i:. 'i':'i:.:.': ".'..:..'iriv:::'. .. ~ :: :'-" ':..::..'~.:.: !~.'. a'.rb~:~_s shall be allowed Lc, i.:,.~ 'f.?,: :r.:'. ~Lc. d..~e of %.he conditic:.al use a~prcvai :M~rch f:3::, ~974), the board of County Con~.issioners will ree':a'.u~:~e this cor, di-_ional use and if fo,;nd to be ahusiTe or de.'.rimental %0 the environment, and no steps · ,,'ere taken to correct the Frcblem, then the BCC has the at['-i%7' to e!ir. inaze the conditional use. EE iT FU~..-H.--_?. FES©LV-ZD that this Resolution relating to Petition N'.'.mk.::' CL'-92-:~ ~.~ rercr,.!ed in the minutes of this Cor~issicn and filed with the County Clerk's Office. P-.~soiuticn ~;umber 93-129 adopted on March 23, 1993 is hereby res::.nJ-~], .".-~Te.~ed and superseded in its entirety. '[his Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of , 1998 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairz~an ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Marj~Jrie 1.!. Student Assistant County Attorney · 13A 2 FINDING OF FACT ' BY COLLIER CObq~TY PLANNING COPSMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-92-16A The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.2.2.3 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) he recommended for approval DATE: CHAIRMAN: o?~ £xh i.b i.l: "IS" HapLes, FL. 339~,0 Affidavit of PubLtcati~ ~pLea DaiLy Ne~s NOTICE OF: PUBLIC H4EA R lNG N~e ~ARD OF C~TY C~ISSI~ERS ~ ~ ~rd ~ C~ ATT/I: NANCY SAL~UB ~, will PO ~X ~1~16 he.lng'on TUESDAY, ~RCH 24, 1~ In ~e Ce~, 33~1 E~t ~ A~. REFERENCE: ~1~ ~SS~ T~ B~d writ c~sl~ P~ CU-~.!~I), C~- 576S~159 I~TICE OF PUBLZC HEA m~ Envlr~me~ol Servkes DI~s~ re~e~ng Slate of FLorida C~II~ C~n~y of CoLLier County Commissioners Before the ~ersJgn~ aut~rity, peri.aLLy C~dlflon "¢" as con- appear~ A~eLa Bryant, who on oath says that she tol~ I. Re~l~ tJum- bar 93.129, which serves as Assistant Secretary of the NapLe~ DaiSy ~ed CU.92-16, Ne~s, a daily newspaper ~b[ished at Hap[el, in ~ CoLLier C~nty, FLorida: that the attached c~y mile west ~ S.R. ~, In of advertisl~ was ~bLi~hed in said n~spaper on ~ ~6 & ~, T~- dates Listed. Emi, c~sistl~ ~ 1,016 Affiant further says that the sa~d NapLes 0alLy ~res, m~e~less. All I~er erred N~S ~S a n~s~per ~b[Jshed at NapLes, in laid me Inv~ed ~ ~d, to CoLLier C~nty, FLorida, a~ that the said r~st~ n~spaper has heretofore been c~t~nu~sLy ~ ~ ~e~s.~ ~bLish~ in said Co[t~er C~nty, FLorida, each ~d ~rl~ to ~e ~bll¢ day a~ has ~en enter~ as seco~ class ~tL h~ ~tte~ et the ~st office in NapLes, in said ~ ~a Co[[ie~ C~nty, FLorida, for a pe~ of 1 year ~ ~d ~11 ~d o re- next prec~t~ the first ~b[Jcati~ of the ~nt~ attach~ c~y of ~vertJse~nt; a~ affiant ~me, ~e ~ ~ v~m furthe~ says that she ~s neither ~id ~ r~d praised any ~rs~ firm o~ c~ration any h ~, disc~nt, rebate, c~issi~ or refu~ for the eyre ~r~se of securing this ~vertJsement fo~ ~lsfo~d. ~b[icati~ in the said newspaper. CO~ISS'ONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORA PUBLZSHED ~: 0~/~ BARBARA a. BERRY, CHAIRMAFI DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BV: /s/ Ellle Hoffmon, ~ch ~ NO. 116~ A~ SeACE: 65.~ ZaCH FILEO OH: 03/~/98 Signature of Affiant Sworn to and Subscribed before me this day of /'~ 19 99- 86 A RESOI,UTIOtl PROVIDi~':G FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RECREATIOtlAL FACILITIES CONDITIONAL USE Ir; THE A-ACSC/S.T ZO'.,~II~G DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2.2.3 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVEI.OPMEHT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF THE U.S. ~41 RIGHT-OF-WAY, CONSISTING OF 1,016 Ar:RE~ MORE CF !,ESS, IH SECTIONS 26 & 27, TO%';[~SHiP 52 SOUTH, RAHGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AHD SUPERCEDING ~ESOI,UTIOH HUMBER 9]-129. WHEREAS, the I.egi:~lat,]r~, , f '.?,e State of Florida in Chapter 67-124r., :.;,;;:: of Florida, ,,r.~J '?..~?'.~r 13:5, Florida Statutes, has conferre,J r~n O~tlier rlo,mty tlr. j~ow,': '.O establish, coordinate and enforce :toning and s,]ch business rec:t]iations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance Ho. 91-102) which includes a Comprehensive Zo~ting Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular aeographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 1993 the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals approved Petition CU-92-16 which granted Conditional Use approval for the property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Environmental Advisory Board has requested the deletion of Condition "c" as contained in Resolution Number 93-129 which requires the Petitioner to submit bird surveys; and WHEREAS, in approvinq this Resolution, it is the intent of ~he Cell [er C~unty [{r~ard of Zoninq Appeals to delete Condition "c" and thereby remove the requirement for submission of bird surveys; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Fl,~nning Commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of Conditional Use ~[3 of Section 2.2.2.3 in an "A" Rural Agricultural 13A2 zone for cl sporting and recreational camp including airboat tours, on t?~e property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory provision and arrangement been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Boa~d having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida that: Fhe petition filed by Mitchell D. and Teresa E. House, d/b/a Everglades Private Airboat Tours and Collier Enterprises, owne~, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: All th~3 property south of the U.S. 41 right-of-way, consisting of 1,016 acres, more or less, and located in Sections 26 & 27, Township 52 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use "23" of the A- ACSC/ST zoning district for recreational facilities in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "B") and subject to the following conditions: a. The Planning Services Manager may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102). b. This project shall be required to meet all County Ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. c. At the time of private airboat tour operation commencement, the petitioner shall install and maintain no trespassing signage along the entire property line every 300~ yards. The entire property shall be utilized specifically for commercial conservation/ecological tours. There shall be no other permitted uses associated with this conditional use. -2- d. The applicant shail utilize existing airboat trails in a round trip method according to the proposed existing trails identified on th~ aerial submitted on February !0, 1993. e. Permits or letters of exemption from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation and the South Florida Water Management District shall be presented prior to the issuance of a final site development plan approval. f. Prior to final site development plan approval the applicant shall submit to Project Plan Review Environmental ,'~.aff for review and approval a Wetland Mitigation and ~nhancement Plan. This plan shall include compensatcr'f measures to offset the wetland impacts on at ]east an equal area basis (Collier County Growth Management Plan - Conservation and Coastal ManaGement Element Poli~y 6.2.7~. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy all exotic vegetation as defined by the County Land Development Code shall be removed at a minimum of fifty {50) foot buffer from the approved final site development plan .~nd nil developed areas shall be maintained free of exotic h. Upon issuance or the Certificate of Occupancy, the b~:~Idinq permit is subject to a forty-five (45) day appeal period by the Florida Department of Cor~unity Affairs. i. The Petitioner sh~ll assist and work with the applicable state and federal agencies (i.e., U.S. Fish and Wildlife f;,~rvice, Florida Game am'] Fresh Water Fish Commission, ',-,to.) ~o prepare base lin~· environmental studies. Tke a[rboats shaJl only be equipped with non-aircraft engines including spark arrestors and properly muffled r,)ducn the noise as much as possible. k. A[rboatfi shall be limited to a maximum length of eighteen (~;~) feet and no more than Leo (10) peopJe aboard, :.nclurtinq the ctr~ver. I. ~?, mn~e ,hnn six ~ a~rPuats ~kall be allowed to operate ()n~ '/ear fro:n the d,,te oi the conditional use approval I~.',.,[(:h ' 3'~, 199'1), the board of County Commissioners will reavaluate this conditional use and if found to be nbu~i'/e or detrimental to the environment, and no steps were taken to correct the problem, then the BCC has ~he obi[it7' to eliminate the conditional use. BE iT ??,THE?. ~E'SOLVED that zhis ~esolution relating Number C;1-g2-16 be recorded in tho minutes of this Co~.ission and filed with the County Clerk's Office. Resolution Number 93-129 adopted on March 23, 199} is hereby rescinded, repealed and superseded in its entirety. -3- 'Chis Resolution adopted ~fter motion, second and majority voce. Done this '~ "' day of __~_/_.7, '"' ,,.~.~,,._.. , 1998 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ' ~ '.' i;-,:~'~ ATTEST: DWIGiiT E. BROCK, Clerk. ApProved as to Form ar~r{ Legal Sufficiency: arjOrie N. ~t~dent Assistant County Attorney -4- I II I III II I III II I II III I III II IIIIII II IIII IIII I .... 1 ....... iiiii FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNI~G COMMI-SSIO~'~ FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITIOt; FOR CU-92-16A The following facts are found: i. Section 2.2.2.3 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Grow-th Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingres~egress Yes ~' No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: ~'/No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect c~nnot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use wi~P.i.~u~distric~ Yes ~-' No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended/~-~'I approval £xhib[t "B" ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT ADVISORY BOARD BY LAWS ARTICLE I Section 1. The name of this organization shall be the lsies of Capri Fire Control District Advisory Board (hereinafter called ICFAB). ARTICLE II PURPOSE Section I. The purpose, objectives and functions of ICFABare: A. To act as an advisory body to the C'ollier County Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter called the BCC) on the affairs of the district. B. Tile ICFAB shall annt, ally prepare a district budget for the BCC estimating the funds, their purpose and the ad valorem taxes necessary for the following fiscal year. C. To recommend to the BCC the adoption ofsuch resolutions or other recast, res as may be r- tuired to insure the accomplishment of the purposes stated herein. D. Management and operational oversight of the Isles of Capri Fire Control District is the responsibility of the County Administrator. He has designated the following chain of command fol' these responsibilities: Fire Chief. Emergency Services Department Chief and Support Services Administrator. Inquiries for information shall be requested through the Fire Chief. Potential issues shall be forwarded to the Fire Chief in writing, utilizing the Collier County Emergency Services Consumer Issue Resolt, tion form (Attachment A). Summary of resolutions will be provided at the scheduled regular meeting. AI{TICLE 1II MEMBERSHIP Section I. The regular membership of the Isles of Capr,.' Fire Board shall consist of five members residing within the district, to be al}pointed by the BCC as follows: A. All members shall be residents and electors of the Isles of Capri Fire Control District. · B, Any member who ceases to be a resident ofthe district during bis or her term ofoffice shall immediately advise the B('C of such change in status. Terms of office fi~r board members .~hall be limited to two cousect,tive terms of service. This provision may be waved by a unanimous vote of the BCC, as provided for in ('ollier County Ordinance No. 92-44. ~_e_c_tj_o_lL'~_. The ('biefofthe Isles of Capri Fire Department or designee will serve as an ex-officio member to ICF:\B without the right to vote. Sectj_9!.L:!: The fl~llowing or their designate will serve as staff advisors to IC'FAIg without the right to vote: · '\. Emergency Services Chief B. St~pport Services A~lministrator Section 4...\ board member shall be deemed to have tendered his or her resignation should the following occur: A. A board member is absent for more than one-halfofthe board's meetings in a given fiscal :,'ear. :\ hoard member is absent from two consecutive board meetings withouta satisfactory excuse acceptable to the boa rd cha i rrna n. ARTICLE IV M E ETI NGS · _Se_c_.ti_o__n_l_. The regular meetings oflCFAB shall be held monthly, or not less than bi-monthly, at such time and place as designated by the Chairman. Special meetings may be called upon a majority vote ofthe advisory board at a regularly scheduled meeting, or upon prior approval of the Support Services Administrator. SR_c.t.iQ.n__2_. Pursuant to Florida Statutes, all meetings shall be open to the public, Notice ofthe forthcoming agenda and minutes from the last meeting ofthe hoard shall be mailed to each member of ICFAB not less than five days prior to the next meeting', ~e_ct. ig.n3__.Three (3) voting members shall constitute a quorum for transaction of any business at any meeting oflCFAB. No scheduled meeting may be cancelled, l,ackofaquorum at a scheduled meeting will constitute a meeting cancellation. _S_ecti. oJ~._4_. .Minutes ofthe meetings will be summarized in written form. Audio tapes will serve as the full record of proceedings. All official records of ICFAB, including minutes, agendas. tapes and resolt, tions duly adopted, shall be maintained by the Isles of Capri Fire Chief or designee. AItTICLE V ()FFICERS ~_e__c:ti__o_.n_ 1~ The members of ICFAB shall elect the follo~ving officers at each meeting held in October of each year: A. Chairman B. Vice-Chairman ~_e.t:t.i_o_n__2_. Tile term of office fl, r officers of ICFAB shall be one 3'ear. Terms will begin on the first meeting of October and continue through the end of September the following >'ear. Section 3. An officer may be re-elected for the same office. Section 4. A vacancy in the office ofChairman or Vice-Chairman may be filled by ICFAB at any reg~ular or special meeting called for that purpose. 8 e_c_' _t i_o. re.S_. Duties: A. Chairman: Shall preside at all meeting of ICFAB and serve as an ex-officio member of all committees. I3. Vice-Chairman: In the absence' of the Chairman or his or her inability to act. shall exercise all powers and duties of the Chairnlan. Tile Vice-Chairman may have other duties as assigned bytlle Chairman. C. Secretary: The Secretary of ICFAB shall be the Isles of Capri Fire Chief or designee. The Secretary shall cause to be kel~t all minutes of all meetings of ICFAB and will be responsible for the giving of proper notice of meetings, tile agenda, providing Collies of the minutes and perfc~rnl eft, ties incidental to tile office of Secretary. It shall be the responsibility of the Secretary to report to the Chai,'man those members who have missed two (2) unexcused consecutive meetings or has been absent for more than one-ball · tile board's meetings in a given fiscal year. Excused 0bsences shall be coordinated with tile Secretary 24 h ¢_~ tJ_r ~1) ri_o. !'_ ±_o_._e_a. c_!! n~e__e_t_~lg i n o rtl e r to m e e t a [t.~ !! (_1 p_!zc_e_.?__e qu i re m e n ts. II IIII Illll I II II II III I I I III ..................... ' II COLLIER COUNTY Revised 3/98 EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ,CONS[hMER ISSUE RESOLUTION AR #: , (if applicable) NIFIRS #' (if applicable) DATE: TIME: NAME OF CALLER: PHONE: NAME OF PATIENT. ADDRESS: REASON FOR CALL: INCIDENT DATE. INCIDENT TIME: INCIDENT LOCATION: REFERRED TO: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT - DIRECTOR (CIRCLEAP?ROPRIATE) EMS - EMERGENCY SERVICES CHIEF HELICOPTER OPERATONS - CHIEF PILOT ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE - CHIEF OCttOPEE FIRE - CHIEF FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED BY WHOM. DEADLINE. A('TION REQL'IRED SIGNATURE' RECOMMENDATIONS / ACTIONS TAKEN: SIGNATURE. CONCLUSION DATE RESOLVED: ADVISED OF APPEAL PROCESS TO EMSAC: ... (Within sixty (60) days) ICFAB OFAB 16^5 CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT OF SUBD{VISION {MPROVEMENTS Tills CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS entered into this . )'5. 'da)' of i,~ '?~' z ~ z/, 1998 between J. Dudley Goodlctte. Trt, slee, the properly owner, hereinafter referred lo as "Developer", and the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as "The Board". RECITAI.S I. I)evelopcr has. simultaneously wilh the delivery of this Agreement. applied lbr the approval by the Board ora cerlain pla! ol'a subdivision to be known as: Kensington Park, Phase Three "C' 2. I)ivision 3.2 of the Collier County Unified Land Development Code requires the Developer lo post appropriate guarantees for the construction of the improvements required bv said subdivision regulations, said guarantees to be incorporated in a bonded agreement lbr the construction of the required improvements. NOW. TI IERF. FORE. in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual covenants hereinaflcr scl forth, i)cvclopcr and the Board do hereby covenant and agree as tbliows: I. Developer will cause to be constructed: a potable water system, sanitary sewer system, drainage, grading, paving and miscellaneous as outlined in Engineer's Cost Estimate (attached hereto as Exhibit "A' and by reference made a part hereof) within 36 months fro,n thc date of approval of said subdivision plat. said improvcn~cnts hereinafter rcli2rred to as the required improvements. 2. Developer herewith tenders its subdivision performance security (auached hereto as Exhibit "B" and by reference made a part hereof) in the amount of $8.800.00 which amount represents 10% of the total conlract cost Itl complete consta~ction plus 100% of thc estimate cost to complete thc required improvements at thc date of this Agreement. 3. in the event ofdclhult by thc I)cvclopcr or failure of thc Developer to complete such improvements within tile time required by thc l.and l)cvelopmcnt Code. Collier County. after written notice to l)cvclopcr, may call upon the subdivision performance security to insure satisfactory completion of the required impr~)vcments. 4. The required improvements shall not be considered complete until a statement of substantial completion by Developer's engineer along with the final project records have been l'umishcd to be reviewed and approved by tile l)cvelopment Sen'ices Director for compliance with tile Collier County l.and l)cvclopmcnt Code. 5. Thc Development Services Director shall, within sixty (60) days of receipt of the statement of substantial completion, either: a~ notify,' thc Developer in writing of his preliminary approval o1' the improvements: or b) notil\' the I)cveloper in xwiting of his refusal to approve improveme,lts, therewith spccil3'ing those conditions which the Developer must fulfill in order to obtain the Director's approval of the improvements, l lowcver, in no event shall tile Development Sen'ices Director refuse preliminary approval of the improvements if they arc in fact constn,cted and submitted for approval in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement. 6. Thc Developer shall maintain all required improvements for a minimt,m period of one .,,'ear after preliminary approval by thc Development Services Director. After thc one year mainlcnancc period by thc i]cvclopcr has terminated, thc Dcvclopcr shall petition thc Development Sen'ices I)ircctor to inspect Ibc required improvements. The Development Sen'ices l)ircct{~r ~r his designee shall inspect thc improvements, and, if found to be still in compliance with Collier County l.and l)cvclopmcnt Code as rcllcctcd by final approval by tile Board, tile Board shall release thc remaining 10% of thc subdivision pcrl'omlancc security. The Developer's responsibility for maintenance of the required improven~cnts shall continue unless or until the Board accepts maintenance responsibility for and by tile County. 7. Six (6) months after tile execution of this Agreement and once within ex'cD' six (61 months thereafter the I)cvclopcr may request tile l)cvclopmcnt Sen'ices Director to reduce tile dollar amount of the subdivision pcrtbrmancc security on thc basis o1' work completed, l:.ach request for a reduction in thc dollar amount of thc subdivision security shall be accompanied by a statement of substantial completion by the Developer's engineer together with lhe project records necessar)' for review by the l)evelopment Scr¥iccs Director. The Development Sen'ices Director may grant tile request fi~r reduction in tile amount of the subdivision performance security l~,r tile improvements completed as ot'the dale of the request. 8. In the event the I)evelopcr shall fail tlr neglect to 131fill its obligations under this Agreement. upon certification o1' such I'ailure. tile Count.',' Administrator may call upon thc subdivision performance security to secure satislhctor2,.' completion, repair and maintenance of the required improvements. The Board shall have the right to construct and maintain, or cause to be constructed or maintained, pursuant to public advertisement and receipt and acceptance of bids. thc improvements required herein. Thc Developer. as principal under the subdivision pcrfom~ancc security, shall be liable to pay and to indemnit3' the Board, upon completion of such construction. 3 the linal total cost to the Board thereof, including, but not limited to, engineering, legal and contingent costs, together with any damages, either direct or consequential, which the Board may sustain on account of the failure of thc l)evcloper to carD' out all of the provisions of this Agreement. 9. All ofthe terms, covenants and conditions herein contained are and shall be binding upon thc l)cvclopcr respective successors and assigns of the I)cvclopcr. IN WI'I'NESS WI IF. REOF. the Board and the Developer have caused this Agreement to be executed by Iheir dul)' authorized representatives this. ~ "' day of~, 1998. Signed. Sealed and Delivered in the presence of: .I. l)udley Goodlette, Trustee IJOLLY A. NAR;vlON J. Dudley (Joodlelte, Trustee ATTEST: B()ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONI:'RS DWIGi IT E. BROCK, Clerk ()F C()I.IAI:.R COUNTY. FI.ORII').\ .. ,...,- - BarbX~ B.'BeF-T~,,. ChaXtrrnanX. .~, · . . ~.,: Si':,:..,.:.::".: Approved ns to Ibm] and legal sufficiency: Dnvid Weigel Collier County Attorney 4 EXHIBIT "A" ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY I. Potable Water System $ 21,668.00 il. Sanitao' Scwcr System $ 16,023.40 III. Drainage $ II,325.20 IV. Paving. Concrete. Miscellaneous $ 38,208.10 SubTotal $ 87.224.70 Total (rounded to nearest $I,000) $ 88,000.00 10% of Total $. 8,800.00 100% of Uncompleted Work $ 00.00 Letter of Credit amount = $ 8,800.00 o6324\('&M-agree 2. CATE: 1-24-98 ESI'I~,ATE: Tl~REE ~: il 25717 P.ROJEC'I': KENSINGTON GARCENS PERICO ENOING: 1-25-98 ':~ ESTIHATED UNIT ESTI~,ATED PREVIOUS PREVIOUS CURRENT CURr. ENT TO DATE TO ~ATE ?BER CESC;RIPTICN CUA,NTITY UNIT PRICE AI~CL,q~I' ~ITY ~UNT QUAhrFITY A/iI3UNT (]UAJ~TITY TYPE F Cb~B I~7.00 LF $4.65 6728.55 0 0.O0 512 2380.80 512 2380.80 TYPE E .'~CDIFIEO CURB 115.00 LF $5.50 632.5 0 0.00 116 638.00 ~ 115 626 00 12' WICE RI:~BCN CbP,8 108.00 LF $9.10 982.8 0 0.00 0 0.O0 0 '. STCP B~l & CRCSS WALK 1.00 EA $225.00 225 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 . 4' CCNC SiCEWALK, 4' WICE 3580.00 LF $5.35 19153 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.O0 ~ CFF S::". F",LL & FI.'iAL G2~DI 0.O0 CY $7,90 0 0 0.00 0 0.O0 0 0.'~0 ~ A. CFF S~TE F',LL (TRUCK ~EAS25000.00 CY $5.60 112000 0 0.00 5886 32961.60 5686 32961.50, : C, Fill G~DI~ IN R/W & U.2~000.00 SY $0.65 18200 0 0.00 10000 6500.00 )JOCG !. 1' STOl~ CF SCO 9969.00 LF S0.30 2990.7 0 0.00 0 0.00 O :. CCNC PA'/ERS W/CO, NC I~LSE (GO 1~.00 SF $4,40 633.6 0 0,00 0 0.00 0 0.00 5. CCNC PAVERS (EAT~ I,ANE12138.00 SF $3.00 36414 0 0,00 0 0.00 0 0.00 ~, ~ST & EROSICN CONTROL 1.00 LS$3,540.00 3540 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 · GUAACRAIL PAINTED W/STEEL PO 730.00 LF $16.00 l16P,0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 ~. TYPE IV ENO A,NCHCRS (PAI,NTED 4.C0 ~ S725.C0 2900 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 CCNST STJXE-CUT. SURVEY F~i,H 1 LS$9.654.00 9654 0.16 1544.64 0.29 2799.66 0.45 4344.30 ;:,CULTS L~CR ChLF :ENCH & I CCNCU!TS LF 3.00 0 0 0.00 260 780.00 260 :ENCH & 2 CCNCgITS LF 4.25 0 0 0.00 1500 6375.00 I500 6375.'.q0 :ENCH & 3 CCNCL':TS LF 5.50 0 850 4675.00 880 4840.00 J7~0 95~5 C0 ;E.~CH & 4 CChCU[~S LF 6.75 0 0 0.00 500 3375.00 50,0 3375.'30 :ENCH & 5 CCNCU[TS LF 8.00 0 0 0.00 670 5360.00 670 5~60.00 ]NCUITS ~BCR & M~TERIALS ;.ENCH & ! CCNCUITS LF 4.50 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 01.~0 :.ENCH & 2 CCNCUITS LF 6.25 0 0 0.00 775 4843.75 775 -'~"-2 75 :ENCH & 3 CChCU!TS LF 8.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.']0 :ENCH & 4 CCNCUITS LF 9.75 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 g C CPTICNJL ~VE~S CCNC~ETE BASE 8546.00 SF 4.40 37602.4 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 CO 112' WICE ~iBBCN CUrB 1452.00 LF 9.05 13140.6 0 0.00 400 3620.00 400 ~,*SE 3C POTABLE WATER SYSTEM 1. 10' C900. CL200 PVC 810.00 LF $11.60 9396 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 CO 2. 10' GATE VALVE WITH 1.00 EA $895.00 896 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 3. SIDLE WATER SERVICE 1.00 ~ $338.00 338 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.C0 4, CCCBLE WATE~ SERVICE 7.00 EA $608.00 4256 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.CO 5. FIRE HY~RAJ~T ASSEMBL 3.00 F.A$1,931.00 5793 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.g0 6. 4' PVC CONOUIT (F&I) 220.00 LF $4.50 990 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 7. CPTICNAL WATER. INST'FBO LF $3.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM 1. 8' PVC SH 0'6 720.00 LF $11.75 8460 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2. 4' H,~,NHOLE 0'6 2.00 EA$1.315.00 2630 0 0.O0 0 O.00 0 000 3. 6' PVC LATERALS 0303 506.00 LF $4.90 2479.4 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4. 6' PVC CLE~,NOUT 16.00 EA $99.00 1584 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 5. STEEL CASING W/GASCA 6.00 LF $145.00 870 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 :[. DRAINAGE SYSTEM I. 15' RCP. CL Iii 24.00 LF $17.15 411.6 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2. 18' RCP. CL III 156.00 LF $21.10 3291.6 0 0,00 0 O.00 0 3. CATCH BASIN OBI. DS~ 1.00 F.~A$1.517.00 1517 0 0.00 0 O.00 0 0.00 4. C~FLICT BOX. DS ~6 1.00 EA$1,305.00 1305 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 O~TE: 1o24-G8 EST[H~TE: THREE BRI ~ 20797 P~GJECT: KENSINGTON C~RDENS PERIO0 ENDING: 1-25-98 :TE~ ESTImaTED UI~IT ESTIHATED PREVIOUS PREVIOUS CURRENT CUPRENT TO DATE TO DATE ,LIMBER CESC~IPTICN CIJANTITY b~IT PRICE ~NT QUANTITY ~ QUANTITY A/~CUNT CU~d~I'ITY A~CCNT 5. CURB INLET W/PCX.~ED 2.00 EA$2.400.00 4800 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 '1. G~%ti3ING. PAVING. & HISCELb&NEC4JS I. 12' STABILIZED Stq)C~t 4133.00 SY $1.35 5579.55 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2. 6' LI~EROCK BASE 3008.00 SY $3.70 11129.6 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 3. 3/4' ASPH.AI.T (1st LI 2302,00 SY $1,30 2992.6 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 4. 3/4' ASPHALT (2r4 L[ 2302.00 SY $1.35 3107.7 0 5. 2' ¥~LLEY GUTTE~ 1726.00 LF $3.80 6558.8 0 0.00 0 O.00 0 6. 4' CCNCR~I'E SIdewaLK B63.00 LF S5.35 4617.05 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 7. ~° STRIP CF SCO 1725.00 LF $0.30 5~7,8 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 8. ¢~At~E ROW & U,E. 5700.00 SY $0.65 3705 O 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 9. CFF SITE FILL TBO CY $5,60 0 0 0.00 0 0,00 0 0.00 :CNSTRUCTICN STAXEOUT 1.00 LS 3.170.00 3170 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 909027.70 144253.64 328900.21 473153.85 - 617-.5~2 16A 6 COLONIAL COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 152104 MARCH 5, 1998 ISSUER: COLONIAL BANK (hereinafter "Issuer") PLACE OF EXPIRY: At Issuer's Counters DATE OF EXPIRY: This Credit shall be valid until March 5, 1999 and shall thereafter be automatically renewed for successive one-year periods on the anniversary of its issue unless at least sixty (60) days prior to any such anniversary date, the Issuer notifies the Beneficiary in writing by registered mail that the Issuer elects not to renew this Credit. APPLICANT: Avila Limited Partnership 5100 Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34103 BENEFICIARY: The Board of County Con%missioners, Collier County, Florida (hereinafter "Beneficiary") c/o Office of the County Attorney, Collier County Courthouse Complex, Naples, Florida. AMOUNT: $14,u62.22 (U.S.) up to an aggregate thereof. CREDIT AVAILABLE WITH: Issuer. BY: Payment against documents detailed herein and Beneficiary's drafts at sight drawn on the Issuer. DOCUMENTS REQUIRED: AVAILABLE BY BENEFICIARY'S D~AFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON THE ISSUER AND ACCOMPANIED BY BENEFICIARY'S STATEMENT PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY THE COUNTY MANAGER CERTIFYING TI{AT: "Avila Limited Partnership has failed to construct and/or maintain the improvements associated with that certain plat of a subdivision known as "Avila Unit One" or a final inspection satisfactory to Collier County has not been performed prior to the date of expiry, and satisfactory alternative performance security has not been provided to and formally accepted by the Beneficiary". DRAFT(S) DRAW1q UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT MUST BE MAB/~ED: "Drawn under Colonial Bank Credit No. 152104 dated March 5, 1998". The original Letter of Credit and all amendments, if any, must be presented for proper endorsement. ~ Affii~te of Colonel l~cO~up. Inc. 27975 Old 41 Road. RO. [~wcr 2~8. l~nlm Spdn~, FIo~ 34133-2~8 %l~honc 941/¢~)2-2201 / ~x 941~)2-0535 ~'.coh.~iM~nk.com AN ~X~UM. OPI~)RTUNITY EMPLOYER 6 This Letter of Credit sets forth in full the terms of the Issuer's undertaking and such undertaking shall not in any way be modified, amended, or amplified by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement referenced to herein or in which this Letter of Credit relates, and any such reference shall not be deemed to incorporate herein by reference any document, instrument or agreement. Issuer hereby engages with Beneficiary that draft(s) drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this Credit will be duly honored by Issuer if presented within the validity of this Credit. This Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1983 Revision) International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 400. COLONIAL BANK B ~tr~-~ce President By: 16A 6 COLONIAL BANK I~L%BL~ BANK LETTER OF CREDIT EVIDENCE OF AU%'~K;RITY DATED: March 5, 1998 This document is to certify that Kenneth W. Kidd, First Vice President, has the necessary authority to execute the Irrevocable Bank Lotter of Credit Nut, bet 152104 issued March 5, 1998 on behalf of The Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida. Corporate Seal ////~c~i' E. Whi(ten~al~/ w le Executive Vice President An Af/illate of Colonial BancGroup, Inc. 27975 Old 41 Road, EO, Drawcr 2648, Bonita Springs, Flor~ch 34133-2648 Telephone 9417992.2201 ! Fax 94 U992-0535 www.colonialbank.com AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER COLLIER COUNTY I,AND DEVELOPMENT CODE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS Tills CONSTR. UCFION AND MAINTENANCE ^GREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVF. MENTS entered into this'-:"" da)' of //~z~i,~-X'" , 1998, between ,4Vii.,4 LIMITED PARTN£RSHIP, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and the Board of County Commissioners &Collier County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as "The Board". !. Developer has, simultaneously with the delivery ofthis Agreement, applied £or the approval by the Board ora certain plat ofsubdivision to be knovm as: AVIL,4 UNITONE. 2. l)Msion 3.20fthe Collier County I,and Development Code requires the Developer to post appropriate guarantees for the construction and improvements required by said subdMsion regulations, said guarantees to be incorporated in a bonded agreement for the construction of the required improvements. NOW. TIIEREFORE. in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual covenants hereinattcr set forth, Developer and the Board do hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Developer will cause to be constructed: Water, sewer, drainage, access, buffer and lighting infrastructure serving A VILA UNIT ONE within 6 months from the date of approval of said subdivision plat. .said improvements hereinafter referred to as the required improvements. 2. l)eveloper herewith tenders its subdMsion performance security (attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by reference made a pan hereof) in the amount of $14,062.22 which amount represents 10% o£ the total contract cost to complete construction plus 100% of the estimate cost to complete the required improvements at the date ofthis Agreement. 3. In the event of default by the Developer or failure of the Developer to complete such improvements within the time required by thc Land Development Code, Collier County. may call upon the subdivision performance security to insure satisfactory completion of the required improvements. 4. The required improvements shall not be considered complete until a statement of substantial completion by Developer's engineer along with the final project records have been furnished to be reviewed and approved by the l)evclopmcnt Services Director for compliance with the Collier County l,and Development ('ode. I 5. The Development Scn,'iccs Director shall, ,,,,ithin sixty (60) days of receipt oFthc statement of substantial completion, either: a) notify the Developer in writing of his prcliminar)' approval of the improvements: or b) notify the Developer in writing of his refusal to approve improvements, therewith specifying those conditions which the Developer must fulfill in order to obtain the Director's approval ofthe improvements. ! Io,,vever. in no event shall the Development Sen'ices Director refu~ preliminary approval o£ the improvements if they are in fact constructed and submitted for approval in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement. 6. The Developer shall maintain all required improvements for a minimum period of one year after preliminary approval by the Development Services Director. After the one year maintenance period by the Developer has terminated, the Developer shall i;e;ition thc l)evclopment Sen'ices Director to inspect the required improvements. The Development Services Director or his designee shall inspect the improvements and. if found to be still in compliance with the ('oilier County l,and Development Code as reflected by final approval by the Board, the Board shall release the remaining 10% subdivision performance security, The Developer's responsibility for maintenance of the required improvements shall continue unless or until the Board accepts maintenance responsibility for and by the County. 7. Six (6) months after the execution ofthis Agreement and once within every six (6) months thereafter the Developer may request thc Development Services Director to reduce the dollar amount of the subdivision performance security on the basis of work complete. Each request for a reduction in the dollar amount of the subdivision performance ~curity shall be accomplished by a statement of substantial completion by the Developer's engineer together with the project records ncccssaD' for review by the Development Scr¥ices Director. The Development Ser~4ces Director may grant the request for a reduction in the amount of the subdMsion performance security for the improvements completed as of the date of the request. 8. in the event the l)eveloper shall fail or neglect to thlfill its obligations under this Agreement. upon certification of such failure, the Count)' Administrator may call upon the subdivision performance .security to secure satisfactory completion, repair and maintenance of the required improvements. The Board shall have the right to construct and maintain, or cause to be constructed or maintained, pursuant to public advertisement and receipt of acceptance of bids, the improvements required herein. The Developer, as principal under the subdivision perfbrmance security, shall be liable to pay and to indemnify the Board, upon completion of such construction, the final total cost to the Board thereof, including, but not limited to. engineering, legal and contingent co~s, together with any damages, either direct or consequential, which the Board ma)' sustain on account ofthe failure ofthe Developer to fulfill all ofthe provisions of this Agreement. o. All of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained are and shall be binding upon the l)cveloper and the respective successors and assigns of the Developer. IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, the Board and the Developer have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives this. A:~day of March, 1998. Signed. Scaled and Delivered AVII.A I.iMITED PARTNERSltlP in the presence off By: BDG-AVILA AT GREY OAKS, INC. its General Panner t, 0' \,. J , An"h'rl't',qhaffan, i~ s President -- -"' ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Dwight E. Brock, Clerk OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ~ '/,,,~/:~-,- z-,-.,--~, .z'.~.'"/,', ,'-/~. .,-r /.' /, '/; By ,. App ' ""'" ' .... roved as to form and s: ...... , .: legal sufficiency: :. David C. Weigel [~I. Collier County Attorney 4 ('()NSTRIJCTION, ~;IAINTENANCE AND ESCROW A(;REE~IENT Ff)R St[ili)IVISION !.~I PI,If)VE~I ENTS TI lis A(iI,',I'~I'~N. Ii'~NT entered into this 161h tl:Lv ol'January. 1998 by RI';VC'O/(iIi Joint Vcntt,rc. Florida general parmcrship (hereinafter "Developer"). 'I'IIF. F',()ARD ()F ('()t'NTY ('()NIMI.N.":,I()NI!R."i ()I: C()I.I.II".R ('()t~N'I'Y. FI.f)RII)A (hcrcinat'tcr "Thc Board)and I),:\RNI.71'T I~,ANK. N.A. (hcrcinal'tcr "l.cndcr"). RI'('I I ..\1 A. [)cvclopcr has. simultaneously wHh Iht delivery o1' this Agreement. applied t~r thc approval Iw tl~c l~oard ol'a certain plal O1'~1 suHdix ~s,~n to bc knoxvn as (lien ]~dcn. B. l'hc subdivision will include cerlain improvements which arc required by ('oilier ('ountv ordinances, as scl fi~rlh in ;t site construclion cost cslimalc ("l(sfimatc"} prepared by ('oaslal I?,ginccrin~ ('onsullanis. Inc.. a copy ot'xvhich is ;roached hereto and incorporated herein as I~xhibit I. For purposes ol'lhis ..XgrccmcnL Iht "Required Improvcmcnls" arc limilcd lo Ihosu described in die ('. Ncclions 3 ~ ' 3.2.~). ._.6.).6 ~llld I of IJlC ('oilier ('otulty Subdivision ('otto l)ix'ision th~ilicd I.and l)cvclopmcnl ('ode requires tl~c I)cvclopcr ~o provide appropriate guarantees conslrucli(m and mainlcnancc o1' Ibc Required Improvements. I). l.cndcr has cnlcrcd into a construction loLtll a~rccment with l)cvclopcr dated .l~l~ltizirv 19~}g (thc "('onstruction [.o~u1"). ~lld incident d~crclo caused Developer ~o deposit fimds wid~ l.cn~cr in i~1 [HllOtlllI sul'l]ciem Io fund Iht cosl of lhe Required Improvements. l)cvclopur illld Iht I~oard have acknoxvlcdgcd that tl~e illllOtlllt l)cvclopcr is required ~tltll'tllllCc ptlrstl~lll[ 1o this ~gl'cclllCllt is $39~.200. and dfis alllOtl~11 represents I I(~'% oI'II1c I)cvclopcr's engineer's cstimalc of Ibc conslruclion costs I~r thc Required Improvements. N()W. TI II~RI.;I.'()RI.;. in considcralion ~d' Iht Ibrcgoing premises ~md nit,tutti hurcinal'tcr set Ibr~h. I)cvclopcr. tl~c I~oard and lilt l.cndcr do hereby covenant and agree as I. l)cvclopcr will ciitlSC thc xxalcr, sex, ur. roads, drainage and like I~cilitics. ~l~c Required Improvements. ,~ Hc c~nslruclcd l~ursui~nl I~ spccificalions IIl~tl have been approxcd hx iht I)cvch~pmcn~ Scrx'iccs I)ircclor ~ilhin six ~(~ mond~s IFom tl~c dale of approxal ~1' said suHdivision plat. 2. I)cvclopcr hcrcHv aulhorizcs l.cndcr to hold I'unds I)cvclopcr has tl~is date deposited xvHh l.cndcr in Iht HlllOtlll[ oJ' $~0~.2()(). ill CSCl-O~v. pursuant Io tl~e terms ot'lhis Agreement. .~. l.cndcr agrees to hold I)cvelopcr's t~mcls in tl~e ~1IlloL1111 ot $~08._()0 ill escrow. ~o [~c disbursed onl) pursuant to fl~is A~rccmcnt. I.cndcr acknowledges that this Agrccmcnl shall n~,t a ctraxx ~lg~lillSt Ibc ('onstruction l.oan l'und, nor lhc l.oan Monies. 4. Thc escrowed fimds shall be released ~c, fl~e l)cvcloper only upon wriucn approval I)cvclol~mCnl Services l)ircc,~r who shall approve file release ol'lhc I~mds on deposit not more ' 16A7. th;in ~n¢¢ a monlh to lh¢ I)evelopcr. in amt~unls duc liar work th~nc Io dale based ~n pcrccnlagc c~mplcli~n ol'lJlc work n~uhiplicd bs' thc rcspcclivc work c~sls less ten pcrccnl ~ Ii)",, and l~[~hcr, that ttpt~n completion ~l'lhc work. thc i)cvclopmcnl Scrx'iccs I)ircct~r shall appr,,x'c the release ~1' any remainder of cscroxvcd l~nds except t~ thc extent of' S398.2()0 xx hich shtdl remain in escrow as a l)evclopcr gtutranb (~1' maintenance of thc I~ctluircd Improx'cmcn[5 liar minimt~m periled ~l'~nc Ill year purst~ant t~ l'ara~raph l J)~1' thc .,Xgrccn~cnt. I h~xscx ct. in thc cs'tnt that l)cxchq~cr sh;dl I~il h~ c~nlply xvilh tl~c rcquircn~cnts ~l'this ..X~rccmcnt. then I.c~tlcr ;~grccs t~ pay Io thc ('ountx' immediately upon demand thc balance (~1' thc I~nds held cscr~xx' by Ibc I.cntlcr. as ~l'lhc d;~lc ol'lhc tlcm;~ntl, provided Ihal upon payment of stroh I~ thc ('ounty. Iht ('~tlnlx' xxill hax'c execrated and dclix'crcd to thc I.cndcr in cxchanec lk~r such I~nds ;~ slalemcnt to I~c signed by thc I)cx'elopment Services l)ircclor to thc cl'l~ct I)c;'cl~pcr i't~r retire th;tn sixtx i61)'J days after x,,'ritlcn notilicatior~ ol'such I':tilure has failed lo c~mply with thc requirements ol'lhis :\grccn~cnt: Ihe ('~tlnt.v. ~r ils ;lulln~ri,,cd ;Igcnl. will c~mplclc thc x~'ork called liar under thc terms t~l'lJle ;I[~l~vC-lllClllJ~ll¢,d c'l~lllr~lci t~r will C~lllpJulc st~ch porii~n ~l'such work ~ lhe ('J~lllllX. ill IlS stlJe dJscl'ellt~ll shall deem nccess~rv ~n Ihe public Jnl~q'esl Io thc' cxt~'nl ~l'tJle l~llltls lhell ho'ltl ill c'scr~x~: 'l'hc cscrox,, I'tun. ls th'z~xs n dt~x~, n hx' thc ('~ttnt',' shall be t,scd l;,~r con.strtlction t~l'the I~etluired Impr~x'emcnts. engineering, legal ;md c(~ntin~cnt c~sts and expenses. ~md t~ oll~ct ~tn3 dam;~gcs, either dirccl ~r consCtlUcnti~d, xx'hich thc ('~untx' may st~sl;~in on ~cc~tH~l ~1' lilt l~ilt~rc ~I' Iht I)cx'clopcr I~ c;~rrx' ~tll ;llld cxcCtllC lilt ;d~s'c-Tl~cnlit~l~cd dcx'elt~pmcnl xvt~rk: ;~nd. Itt l l'hc (.'t~tlntx' will prt~mptly rep;.ty It~ Ihe I.cndcr ;.tn.s,' p¢~rtit,n ~*I' tile l'tinds dr;~xvn 5. Vs'rillcn n~licc It~ Iht I.cnder I~s' thc ('~tmlv specifying what am(~t~nts ;~r~' to bc p;tid to thc l)cx'chq~cr sh;~ll c~nslitutc auth~ri/;~ti~n by thc C'J~ulltv to thc l.cndcr Ik~r rclc;tsc ~l'thc specified I't~ntls lo thc I)cvch~pcr. I'aymcnt hx' thc l.cndcr I~'ttcr t~l';n~tln~ri/;~tit~n by thc ('t~tmtv tt~ thc l.cmtcr shall ct~nstitulc a rclc;~sc by thc ('ountv and l)cx'chq~cr t~l' thc l.cndcr lk~r thc f'tmds tlisburscd in accordance with the lutt¢~ ~1' at~thori~ation I'ron~ thc 6. Thc l),cttt~irett Inlprt~x'cmcnt.,; sh;tll n~t I've c~nsidcred complete until a st;Itcmcnt t~l'st~bst;tntial c~mplclit~n by I)cx'cl~pcr's engineer along with Iht Iinal prqjcct records hax'c been lk~rnishcd t~ be rcx'icxxcd ;~ntl ;ippr~vcd hv thc l)cx'clt)l)nlCnl Scrx'iccs i)ircctor I~r compliance xx'ith Iht ('oilier ('t~untx St~t~tlix'is~n Ilcgtll;~lit~n~. 7 'l'hc I)cx'clopmcnt Scrx'lcc.,; I)lrccl~'~r 5;h:lll. xvilhin .s~xp,. t6f)) d~lys of receipt of thc st:llcn~clit ~,I' ~t]hst;~nl];d c~n~plct]~n, either: ;~)nolilk' thc I)cx'cl~pcr ~n writing o1' his prclintinary al~prox';ll of thc imprt~x'ctncnts: ~r I~) nt~til'x' thc I)cx'ch~pcr in writing of his rcl'us;d to apprt~x'c thc impr~vcmcnts. Ihcrcxxith spccil?ing lily,Sc c~nditit~ns which tile I)cx'clopcr must I~dlill in order ' 16A7 to obtain tile Director of the Required hnproven'~ents. However, in no event shall thc Development Sen, ices Director refuse preliminary approval of the improvements if thc,,' arc in fi~ct constructed and submitted for approval in accordance with tile requirements'of this Agreement. 8. Should thc fimds held in escrow be insuflicicnt to complete thc Required linprovcmcnts, thc Board, after duly considering thc public interest, may at its option complete thc Required Improvements and resort to any and all legal remedies against thc Developer. 9. Neff'ting in this Agreement shall make the Lender liable for any funds other than those placed on deposit by thc Developer in accordance with the foregoing provisions; provided, that thc Lender docs not release ;my monies to the Developer or to any other person except as stated in this Escrow Agrccmcnl. 11'). 'File l)cvclopcr shall maintain all Required hnprovcmcnts for one year aflcr prelimina~' apf)roval by tile i)cvclopmcnt Sen'ices l)ircclor. Aflcr Iht one year mair~tcnar~cc period by thc Developer and upon submission ora written request for inspection, the Development Sen'ices Director shall inspect thc Required Improvements and, if fi)und to be still in compliance with the Code as reflected by final approval by thc Board, thc I.cnder's rcsponsibilily to the Board under this Agreement is temlinated. Tile Developer's responsibility for maintenance of the Required Improvements shall continue tmlcss or until thc Board accepts mainlcmmcc ~csponsibility lbr and by the (.'ounty. I1. All of the ten'rm, covenants and conditions herein contained are and shall bc binding upon thc respective successors and assigns of the Developer and Lender. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board and the Developer have cgused this Agreement to bc executed bv their duly author1×cd representatives this ~ - day of .ri ~";~' "'- X/' , 1998. SIGNED. SEALED AND DELIVERED IN TH[:. PRESENCE OF: t < , (Corporate Seal) ; ' / / : REVCO/GE Joint Venture. a Florida general ' [ panncrship PrintmI c)r Typ'cd Name // ·." 'x,' ,.. By: , //~ ":.,'/.( /,,-~, ~ t_ '----~. ' '":'"~.. .... ,., ~, . '-.' ",., ', _. ' . G~ry Kinsella, as President of Revc6 Primed or Typed Name Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation, itsclfa general panner ' : " <' LENDER ~ ,., -.~, ,:~ . \, (Corporate Seal) '.. ,.<,. ,,. .',~ ,,,..,),.. ~.. Pri'n{,ed or Typed I~'arn6 BARNETT BANK, N.A., a nBtional banking '7"~ 'x , x.... -- ~ corporation , . .:. ,........ ., ~<,<,/../, ~ ~.,,.',._,,.,,.,.,. ~,>.,.,.~-:~x.,.., ~y: .- , [ 15/ Printed or Typed Nam'e ~ Michael Rinal~li~ as Vice President ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ~ 'h'"' ,.C . 7 Approved as td f6m~ and legal sufficiency: ......... David Wcigcl County Attorney QBNAP 1.101 It~. I ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE SLr~M.M~Y I. Potable Water System $ 42,494 II. Sanitary Sewer System $117,545 III. Drainage $ 44,512 IV. Paving, Concrete, MisceLlaneous ~ Subtotal $361,351 Total (rounded to nearest $1,000) $362,000 10% of Total $ 36.200 (~ 110% Letter of Credit amount = $398,200 FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS tX,ST ~^~f--~m. ST ~^~,ts'--,~mUL~ ~c'Kie, Paola S. ColZie~ Count MAILI~ ADORE~ THE ~R~ COUNCI~ COMMI~ION, ~'rHoRI~, OI C~MI~E~ ON WHIC~ I 5E~ I$ A UN~ OF: 3301 Tamtami T~ait E., Admin. Ci~' Naples Cottier Collier ~ch 24, 1998 WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by an)* person serving at thc county, city. or other local Icvci of government on an appoim..-d or elected boa. rd. council, commission, authority, or commhtc~ It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodic~ who ~re prescnKcd with a voting conflict o~* interest under Sectiu, 112..114.1. Florida Statutes. Thc requirements of this law arc ma,da~ory; aJthoush thc usc of this particular form is not required by law. you are encouraged to usc it in making thc disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under thc Jaw when laced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary grcady depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to thc instructions on thL~ fon'n before completing the rc~'crsc side and filing Thc form· INSTRUC~ONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION '1t2.3"143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: A person holding clectke county, municipal, or other local public office ,'vlUST ABSTAIN f~'om voting on a mca.sure which inu~'cs to his special priYat¢ gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mca. sure wl~ich inures to thc special gain of a principal (ocher than a govcrnn'u:nt agency) by whom he is retained. In either case. you should disclose thc conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to ~hc assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you arc abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with thc person responsible for recording thc minutes of thc mccting, who should incorporate the form in thc minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appoimivc coumy, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to thc special gain of a principal (other than a governmcm agenc)') by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which hc has a conflict or interest, but must disclose the nature of thc conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE ~,IEETING AT WI-I]CH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: · You should complete and file thi~ form (before m~king any attempt Io influence the decision) with [he person responsible for recording the minutes of thc mectinl., who will incorporate the form in Ibc minutes. · A copy of the form should be pro~'ided immediatell,' to the other re.embers o1' Ihe ag'ency. · The form should be read publicly at the meesJnl prior Io consideration o1' IJ~ m~ll~ J~l which you have a cml/lic~ or Date: March 26, 1998 To: Adolfo Gonzalez, P.E., Director Office of Capital Projects Management From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Supplemental Agreement No. 4 with CH2M Hill for the Pine Ridge Road Improvement Project Enclosed please find two original documents as referenced above, Agenda Item #16B9, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on March 24, 1998. If you should have any questions, please contact me at: (8406). Thank you. Enclosures FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPALt AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICE;RS LAST NAMt~--FI~ NAAIE--MIOUL1~ NAME NAAIE OF BOARD, COUNCIL. COMMISSION. ALFTHORITT. OR. COMMITTEE Mac'Rie, Pamela $. Collier Count Board ' ~' THE BOARD. COUNCIl... COMMISSION. AJ.,I*rHORITY. Off, CCLMMI*I'rEE ON MAILING ADDRESS WHIL'H I SERVE 15 A UNIT OF: 3301 Tamiami Trail E., Admin. Bldg. : cil~ .X, cnUNT* ,:crr.£~l.c~'At ~;£Nc~ 68 * CITY couN'rY NAA, IV. O1" POLITICAL SUBDIVlSIOI~. Naples Collier Collier County OA~*~: ON WHICH ',OI :' CX'CU~EO MY ~mTION IS: I~c'ch 2,'1, 1998 y, ELECTIVE ~2 ApPOi,"~T1VE. WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by any person serving al thc county, city, or other local Ic.,'cl oir government on an appointcc~ or elected boa'd, council, commission, authority, or committee. 1! applies equally Io members of advisory and non-advisory bodic~ who are presented with a voting conl'lict o1' interest under ScC6Ull 112.314.1, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law a. re mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you arc encouraged to usc it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION tt2.~t43, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public of~cc MUST ABSTAIN f~om voting on a measure which inu~'cs to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly ,,'oting on a measure which inures to thc special gain of a principal {other than a government agency) by whom he is retained· In either case. you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you arc abstaining from voting; and WITHIN I$ DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by complctin,! and Filing this form with thc person responsible for recording thc minutes of thc meeting, who should incorporate thc f~rm in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or oth~ local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inurc~ to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agent') by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflic~ of interest, but must disclose thc nature o1' thc conflict before making any atlempt to influence thc decision by oral or written communication, whcthcr made by thc ol'~ccr or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO ,MAKE ANY A'I'1'ENIPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEE'I'1NG AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: · You should complete and ~le thi~ form (before making any attempt to influence ~he dcc~sion) with the person responsible I'ot rccordini the minutes of thc meeting, who will incorporate thc Form in ~h¢ minutes. · A copy ot' thc form should be pta'ideal immcdiatcty to the other m.cmber~ o1' the alcncy. , . · The form should bc read publicly a~ thc mec~inl pr/or ~o considcragion Ol'lhe mailer i~ which y~u have a czml'l/ct o/' interest, i IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: · You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. · You should complete the form and file it within !$ days afl~r the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST !, Pamela S. Mac'Kie , hereby disclose that on March 24 , 19 98._.~.._.: Ia) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) __ inured Io my special private .--._V/inured to Ihe special ~ain of Pamela $. Mac' ~.e~ _,__L , by w~'~om I am retained. [b) Th,= measure before my agency and the ~talur¢ of my inlcrest in the measure is as follows: Agenda Item 16. B. 5. Approve a Waiver of Road and EMS Impact Fees for the Naples Art Association and the Naples Players. After consultation with the County Attorney, I abstained from voting on the above matter pursuant to Section 286.012, Florida Statutes, which provides that "no member of any state, county, or municipal governmental board, commission or agency who is present at any meeting of such body at which an official decision, ruling or other official act is to be taken or adopted may abstain from voting...except when, with respect to any such member, there is, or appears to be, a possible conflict of interest unde~ the provisions of S.112.311, S.112.313, or S.112.3143. In such cases, said member shall comply with the disclosure requirements of S.112.3143." March 24, 1998 Date Filed . S,$natur¢ Pamela S. Mac'Kie · NOTICE: UNDER PROVIS[ONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §IIZ.317 (1985). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY' REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN SALARY. REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY.NOT TO EXCEED $5.000, ... . ; ., .: · 16g 9 Date: March 26, 1998 To: Adolfo Gonzalez, P.E., Director Office of Capital Projects Management From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Supplemental Agreement No. 4 with CH2M Hill for the Pine Ridge Road Improvement Project Enclosed please find two original documents as referenced above, Agenda Item #16B9, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on March 24, 1998. If you should have any questions, please contact me at: (8406). Thank you. Enclosures Project No. 69101 S/A NO. 4 SI IPPIF, MENTAI. AGREEMENT TO CONSUl.TING L:NGINEF. I~,ING SERVICF. S AGRF. F. MENT TillS SUI'PLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ,,,~,~ day of'~' ,,,-._..L' ,,,4, .. 1998. by and bem'een the Board ol'Counly Commissioners. Collier Court--ida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter called fl~e COUNTY. and CI I2M Ili[l of 4350 W. Cypress S~ree~. Suite Tampa. Florida 33607-4155, duly amhorized to contlucl business in the Stale of Florida. hereinafter called CONSULTANT. WH'N ESS ETI I WIIEREAS, thc COUNTY and CONSULTANT heretofore on 19 April 1994 entered imo an Agrccmcnl whereby thc ('OUNTY rctaincd the CONSUI,TANT Io fllrnishcd ccflain consulting services in connection wilh proposed conslruclion of C.R. 896 six laning improvements, (Jct. C.R. 31 Io Jct. 1-75~, ('ou~lly Projccl No. 60111; and. WI {EREAS, thc Cotmty desires to modify thc Icrms of said Agrccmcnl, and toward thai end il is necessary EXPAND UPON THE SCOPE OF SERVICES PREVIOUSLY AUTIfORIZED SPECIF1CALLV RELATING TO ADDITIONAL PLANS PREPARATION, CONSTRUCTION SERVICES. AND TO COMPENSATE TI IE CONSULTANT FOR ADDITIONAL COSTS TO BE INCURRED FOR SAID ADDIIIONAL SERVICES. CONSULTANT'S FEE PROPOSAL FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES DATED 31 DECEMBER 1997 IS ATTACHED }IERETO AND IS IIEREBY INCORPORATED AND MADE A FORMAL PART OF TIIIS SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 4. NOW TI IEREFORE. thc Consuhing Engineering Services Agreement is hcrchy amended ami supplcmcntctl as ~ollows: I. Consultant shall perform roadway design services as described in Attachment "A". 2. Consultant's cost proposal for sen'ices described in Attachment "A' is provided in Attachment "B". 3. Conlracl I~c adjustment and status (this Supplemental Agreement No. 4): 3.1 Original maximum contract fcc = 5395.365.00 3.2 S/A No. I - S125.000.0t1 3.3 S/A No. 2 :: S 9,291J)0 3.4 S/A No. 3 : 5194,420.Ot) 3.5 This S/A No. 4 maximum contract I~c :~ 5186J}92.00 Maximum and current contract fcc = 5910.168.00 4. Contracl time adjustment: Increase 350 calendar days Ibr design services. 5. Contract cmnplction time to hc tlctcrmincd by Notice to Pmccctl Ibr thc construction phase. 6. Thc revised and current lump sum contracl amouot as slatctl above includes costs Ibr overhead. I?inge benefits, out-ol~pockct expenses, profit margin, and all other direct m~d indirect costs and expenses. 7. Except as hereby modified, anlcndcd, or changed, all of thc temps and conditions of said original Consulting Engineering Sen'ices Agreement shall remain in fidl force and effect. IN WITNESS WI tEREOF, Ibc pamics hereto have caused these prcsenls lo be executed ibc day a;ld year first above written. ' Page I of'2 PrQcc! No. 6910 I S/A N0. 4 AS TO 'FILE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: AS TO FORM AND I.EGAL SUFFICIENCY: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COI.LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: * ATTEST; z'f. 'Dwi~hl E~ Bro~ Cler~oF ~ou~s AS TO 'FILE CONSULTANT: CH2M HILL SIGNED, SEAI. EI). AND DELIVERED IN THE PRESENCE OF: SECaNt) ~VITNESS (NAME ~VRITTEN) ~d~ ~, (CORPORATE SEAL) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF I IILLSBOROUGI{ Before mc. thc undersigned atithority, this day personally appeared Sieve Aashcim, 1o me well known and known to mc to be Vice President of the Co~oration named in the foregoing Agrccmcnl. and hc severally acknowledged to and before me that he cxcculed said Agrccmcnt on behalfofand in the name of said Co~oration as such officer: that Ibc seal affixed to said Agreement is the co.orate seal of said Co~oration and that il was afl3xcd thcrcto by duc and regular Co.orate authority; that he is duly authorized by said Co~oration to cxccutc said Agreement and that said Agreement is Ibc free act and deed of said Co~oration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and affixed my official seal this ~ ~ day Nol~ and Slulc albrcsaid. My Commission Expires: fi BEVERLYJ.~ ~ No~ P~I~, S~la of Y~n i Page 2 of 2 :'. '.. 16B ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PINE RIDGE ROAD C.R. 896 [C.R. 31 - 1-75] PROJECT NO. 60111 Supplemental Agreement No. 4 December 3 I, 1997 I. ~Videning of Pine Ridge Road at Napa Boulevard to accommodate dual left turns in the median of Pine Ridge Road. Services required for the widening of the median of Pine Ridge Road at Napa Boulevard will be in amending the 65% submitted plans up to 900 feet ',,,'est and east of existing Napa Boulevard. The median will be widened to the north to a width of 29 feet - 2 inches to accommodate two 12-foot left turn lanes and a 4-foot traffic separator. Services are as follows: I. The CONSULTANT will revise the horizontal and veo. ical design which includes: 1.1 Modify the vertical profile design to accommodate the relocation of the profile grade line (PGL) caused by the widening. The new PGL and pavement overlay will be designed in accordance with the current 65% design. 2. The CONSULTANT will perform an analysis of the impact to the storm sewer system caused by the widening of Pine Ridge Road to ensure the storm sewer has adequate capacity to accommodate the additional pavement area. 3. The CONSULTANT '.viii revise the 65% level drainage design to accommodate the widening of Pine Ridge Road as follows: 3.1 Revise storm sewer system design from Livingston Road west to the D2 canal. Prr sa4 scp 123197.doc ' 'Attachmcnt A 1 6~ 9 Pine Ridge Road Supplemental Agreement No. 4 Page 2 December 31, 1997 3.2 'Revise detention basins east of 1-75. 3.3 Revise all cross drains in the area of the increased widening of Pine Ridge Road to accommodate dual left tums at Napa Boulevard. 3.4 Update and recompute required treatment volumes and basin modeling for SFWMD permitting. 4. The CONSULTANT will revise the 65% level plans for the widening of ?ine Ridge Road to accommodate dual left turn lanes on Pine Ridge Road as follows: 4.1 Typical Modify typical section sheets. Sections: 4.2 Drainage Map: Update map with new drainage a~eas and re- numbering of structures. 4.3 Plan and Modifications to 65% Pine Ridge Road plan and Profile: profile sheets east and west of Napa Boulevard. Modifications to the design of Napa Boulevard are not anticipated. 4.4 Drainage Modification and update the current 65% level Structure: sheets and possible additional structures determined from analysis. 4.5 Cross Section: Update and modify current 65% level cross sections for Pine Ridge Road. 4.6 Signing and Update and modify current 65% level signing and . Marking: marking sheets. 4.7 MOT: Update and modify current 65% level maintenance of traffic sheets. 4.8 Signalization: Prepare signal plans for a new traffic signal at Napa Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road. Provide interconnect between Napa Boulevard and the signals at the two 1-75 off ramp signals. 4.9 Lighting: Update and modify current 65% level lighting Prr sa4 scp 123197.doc Attachment A Pine Ridge Road Supplemental Agreement No. 4 Page 3 December 31, 1997 sheets. 4.10 Landscaping: Update and modify current 65% level landscaping sheets. 5. Additional geotcchnical investigation is not required. The additional widening of Pine Ridge Road for the dual left turn lanes is not expected to require additional permitting effort. 6. Coordinate with FDOT on the widening of Pine Ridge Road within the 1-75 Limited Access right-of-way. II. Realignment of Northbound 1-75 Off-Ramp The CONSULTANT will modify the design of the existing northbound 1-75 off-ramp to replace the existing free flowing right turn lane with a right turn storage lane under signal control. Services included for this task are as follows: I. Modify plan sheets, cross sections, and signing and marking plans for the northbound off-ramp to reflect the realignment of the right turn lane. 2. Add a typical section. 3. Modify maintenance of traffic plans. 4. Modify signal plans to accommodate the relocated right turn lane. 5. Modify the SFWMD drainage calculations to reflect the realignment of the right turn lane. 6. Coordinate the design modifications with SFWMD. 7. Coordinate with FDOT on the design and permitting of the realigned right turn lane. 8. Additional drainage design is not expected to be required as a result of the realignment of the right turn lane. III. Miscellaneous Design Services: The CONSULTANT shall provide the following design services on Pine Ridge Road: 1. Performed right-of-way engineering for Pine Ridge Road, modified design to reduce right-of-way acquisition, updated plans to reflect right..-of-way. 2. Update survey and plans to reflect new development along Pine Ridge Road. Prr sa4 scp 123197.doc Pine Ridge Road Supplemental Agreement No. 4 Page 4 December 3 I, 1997 IV. Add Turn Lanes The CONSULTANT will make modification to the plans for new left turn lanes at the fire station and Cypress Glen, and for new right turn lanes at Cypress Glen, La Costa, and a gas station in the northeast corner of Pine Ridge Road and Whipponvill Lane intersection. Services included for this task are as follows: 1. Revise storm sewer system affected by right turn lane addition. 2. Revise offsite drainage design affected by right turn lane addition. 3. Modification to drainage map, plan and profiles, cross sections, signing and marking sheets, lighting plans, MOT plans, drainage structure sheets, and landscaping plans for the new turn lanes. 4. Revise drainage calculations for increased pavement area, update modeling. 5. Obtain as-built survey of new construction to update the bose maps. See Task III.2. V. Extended Project Administration: This task consists of work by CH2M HILL because of extensions to the project schedule beyond the control of CH2M HILL. Pine Ridge Road was originally scheduled to be a 12-month project beginning April 1994. The project is currently 44 months long with design services expected to be provided for 12 more months resulting in a total design duration of 56 months. The last design submittal was the 65% plans submitted in May 1995. This task includes the following items: I. Salary escalation for work previously contracted which will be performed after December 31, 1997. 2. Project start-up, re-familiarization of team with plans and specifications, retrieval of computer files, site visit, etc. 3. Administration costs for 42 months (May 1995 through November 1998) of additional project duration that include extended project coordination, meetings, progress reports, inefficiencies, etc. a) Right-of-way coordination with Collier County staff, attend meetings and review right-of-way plans. b) Coordinate design of Livingston Road/Pine Ridge Road intersection with Collier County staff, attend meetings and review plans. c) Attend progress meetings with County staff, submit status reports. Prr sa4 scp 123197.doc ", ' AttachmcntA Pine Ridge Road Supplemental Agreement No. 4 Page 5 December 31, 1997 d) Coordinate roadway design: drainage design, and permitting with the Cypress Glen developer. e) Coordinate with design services with Cleveland Clinic developer. f) Coordinate with utility agencies. g) Coordinate with FDOT. VI. Services During ConStruction: During the construction phase, the CONSULTANT shall provide the following services during construction. 1. Bidding Services: The CONSULTANT shall respond to Bidder's inquiries and prepare clarifications. The COUNTY will handle all other bidding services. 2. Contract Administrative Support and On-Site Observation: During the construction phase, the CONSULTANT shall consult with the COUNTY and provide the following services: a) Attend a Pre-Construction Conference, provide assistance to the COUNTY in conducting the meeting, answering questions, and providing necessary information. b) The CONSULTANT's Engineer shall make visits to the site twice per month for twelve (12) months to observe the progress and quality of the executed work of the Contractor(s) and to determine, in general, if such work is proceeding in accordance with the CONSULTANT's design. On the basis of such on-site observations as the COUNTY's consultant, the CONSULTANT shall keep the COUNTY informed of observed deficiencies, defects and delays, and of special communication between the CONSULTANT and the Contractor. A written summary of each visit shall be prepared and submitted to the COUNTY within ten (10) calendar days of the visit. The CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for the me~ns, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction selected by the Contractor(s) or the safety precautions and programs incident to the work of the Contractor(s). The CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for the failure of the Contractor(s) to perform the work in accordance with the contract documents. Prr sa4 scp 123197.doc Pine Ridge Road Supplemental Agreement No. 4 Page 6 December 31,199'/ c) In addition to the twice monthly site visits identified in Task VI.2.b) above, the scope of services includes ten (10) additional site visits to observe construction activities. d) The CONSULTANT will issue, subject to COUNTY approval, necessary interpretations and clarifications of the contract documents. e) A final closeout inspection shall be held to determine compliance with plans and specifications. 0 The CONSULTANT shall prepare a certification of completion required by South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). Complete as-built plans will be provided by the Contractor. The CONSULTAuNT shall review the as-built plans and forward the plans to SFWMD. VII. Project Design Schedule: The project design schedule for design status submittals shall be modified as follows: 1. Revise 65% Design to Include the items contained in this supplemental agreement including widening of Pine Ridge Road at Napa Boulevard and improvements to the 1-75 Interchange: Submit no later than 150 calendar days after FDOT approves the Pine Ridge Road/Napa Boulevard Traffic Study or receiving Notice to Proceed on this Supplemental Agreement No. 4 from Collier County, which ever is later. 2. 90% Design Status: Submit no later than 270 calendar days after FDOT approves the Pine Ridge Road/Napa Boulevard Traffic Study or receiving Notice to Proceed on this Supplemental Agreement No. 4 from Collier County, which ever is later. 3. 100% Design Status: Submit no later than 315 calendar days after FDOT approves the Pine Ridge Road/Napa Boulevard Traffic Study or receiving Notice to Proceed on this Supplemental Agreement No. 4 from Collier County, which ever is later. 4. Bid Plans: Submit no later than 350 calendar days after FDOT approves the Pine Ridge Road/Napa Boulevard Traffic Study or receiving Notice to Proceed on this Supplemental Agreement No. 4 from Collier County, which ever is later. ?rr s.~4 scp 12319'7.doc ' ' Attachment A 1 ~ ~ Pine Ridge Road Supplemental Agreement No. 4 Page 7 December 31, 1997 5. Submit final approved permits upon receipt from the permitting agencies. Ali necessary operational, construction and environmental permit applications (FDEP, ACOE, SFWMD, and FDOT) shall be prepared, processed and ready for submittal in full by the CONSULTANT; and shall be submitted to respective federal, state, local, and COUNTY governing authorities for review no later than the 180th day after FDOT approves the Pine Ridge Road/Napa Boulevard Traffic Study or receiving Notice to Proceed on this Supplemental Agreement No. 4 from Collier County, which ever is later. All necessary permit drawings and supporting technical and non-technical data shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT and shall accompany each permit application. Prisa4 scp 123197.doc 1 6B9 ": · - ' WILKISON 9 .. 1 ENGINEEr~. SClEN'T1STS ANO ~I ENIORANDIIM DATE: December 5, 1997 TO: Mr. Rynn Forrestel, P.E. CH2M Hill r,,,,,_5 FROM: James N. Wilkison, P.S.M~ RE: Pine Ridge Road Additional Sur;'c.v h)r Sul)l)lcmcntal Ag,'ccmcnt No. 4 We estimate the following man hours for providing the additional surveying services needed as outlined in your letter dated November 26, 1997. We have grouped the tasks together based on their location. GROUP 1: i. Median in the vicinity of Sta. 1031 to 1035: a left turn lane has been added for Cypress Glen. 2. Ditch construction from about Sra. 1031, left to the Cypress Glen entrance. Verify there is a new ditch, ifthere is a new ditch, extend survey from the edge of pavement to 40 feet north of the edge of pavement. 3. Cypress Glen entrance area. 4. New right turn lane into Cypress Glen and parallel ditch, vicinity Sra. 1035 to ! 042, left. Addition: Locate sigmal light poles and control boxes (not a listed item in letter of i 1/26/97, but discussed by phone on 12/3/97). Field Crew (3 member) 7 hours (~ $92.50/hr $647.50 CAD Tech 4 hours (~ $55.00/hr $220.00 P.L.S. I hour(~$80.00/hr $ 80.00 Total Fee for Group I $947.50 3506 EXCHANGE AVE,. NAPLES. FL 34104 941-643-2404 941-643-6752 FAX 94 i -643-5173 DAVID S. WILKISON, P.E. JAMES N, WILKISON. P.L.S. HOI~ACE A. WILK,SON. P.L,S. (~Ei'.) ........... ~ll I I I IIII I IIIIIIIII III IIIIII I I I I IIIIIIII ......... '". ' 1.6 9 December 5, 1997 Page 2 of 2 GROUP 2: 5. New right turn lane into La Casta Apartments, vicinity Sra. 1042 to 1048, right. 6. La Caste entrance area. 7. Median opening at La Cesta Apartments, vicinity Sra. 1048. Field Crew (3 member) 4 hours @ $92.50/hr $370.00 CAD Tech 2 hours @ $55.00/hr $110.00 P.L.S. ! hour @ $80.00/hr S 80.00 Total fee for Group 2 $560.00 GROUP 3: 8. Left turn lane to northbound Livingston Road has been lengthened. 9. North approach of Livingston Road has been widened, survey intersection area including new drainage structures. 10. New right turn lane for northbound Livingston Road, vicinity Sta. 1056 to 106 I, left. Field Crew (3 member) 5 hours ~ S92.50 S462.50 CAD Tech 2 hours @ S55.00 SI 10.00 P.L.S. I hour~ S80.00 S 80.00 Total fee for Group 3 $652.50 Please call if there are any questions. END OF MEMORANDUM 3cntr97~qin,:rid~c add I 1076 C,<x~le~ I~. No A. STOCKTON' RE,~?ROE &. ~. H. BUC~N~AN Ill ~e~, FL 34102 ~41) 202-4102 ,~b~r~ ~ I~ ~m~rtCa~ ~OC[~ ~ ~nd~c~ ~ll~ct~ ~ 262.0101 FAX TRANSMrrTAL_**'* 4350 W CYPRESS STREET SUITE TA M~A F.L33507 FAX~: 813-874-3036 PINE KIDGE ROAD- ADDITIONAL DESIGN AGREEMENT L~NDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MODIFICATION FRg~xi. ! D, NK BUCK~L~'qNAN' RF:M.:uRKS: THE ADDITIONAl. DESIGN COS ,.BRF2uKS DO¥, _'N AS FOLi,Q\¥S PER AREA 33~ . 3.715,00 ~irt T~ ~ t~O~O,~ ~YAN, IF YOU ~VE .~Y QUeSTiONS. GI~ A C~L. FAX ~~ Nb~tBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER ~HEETL~.~ ... RESOLUTION NO. 98- 76 A RESOLUTION APPOiNTiNG OFFICERS FOR THE COLLIER COUNTY AGRICULTURAL FAIR AND EXPOSiTiON, ~NC. FOR 1998-99 WHEREAS, on July 20, 1976 the Charter and Articles of Incorporation of the Collier County Agricultural Fair and Exposition, Inc. were filed with the Secretary of State; and WHEREAS, the Charter and Articles of Incorporation of the Collier County Agricultural Fair and Exposition, Inc. provide that the officers of the Board of Directors, with the exception of the Immediate Past President, shall be appointed annually by the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners on March 15, 1988 adop[ed Resolution No. 88-52 setting forth the procedures for appointments to the Collier County Fair Board; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 88-52, the Nominating Committee has submitted its list of recommended nominees, specifying recommended persons for particular positions to the Board of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following individuals are hereby appointed as the 1998-99 officers for the Collier County Agricultural Fair and Exposition, Inc. Board of Directors: Terry Wolfson President Hank Douglas Vice-President Pat Cookson Secretary John Yonkosky Treasurer Jim Mansberger Security Taylor Baker Education Duane Wheeler Civic Ken Cuyler Attorney Randy Riner Agriculture This Resolution adopted this ; .. ' day of 'r,,~,~.:<,.*,"~'i'''- , 1998, after motion, second and majority vote. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Approved as to form and ~,... -, . ,.. County Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 98- 77 A RESOLUTION OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING A GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE TO COMPLY WITH TITLE Il OF TtlE AMERICANS WITll DISABILITIES ACT. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Collier County is a political subdivision ofthe State of Florida. 2. Title Ii of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires ii,at Collier County adopt a grievance procedure to try to promptly resolve complaints that allege a violation of Title Il ofthe ADA. 3. The procedures attached hereto as Attachment "A" arc hereby adopted as the County's ADA grievance procedures. 4. These procedures may be amended from time-to-time as deemed appropriate by Staff and with approval of the County Attorney, without further approval from the Board of Commissioners. 5. Until such time as may be changed by the County Administrator, the County's Risk Management Department shall coordinate efforts to try to ensure the County's full compliance with these grievance procedures, as may be amended from time-to-time. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED THIS ;''v'~ DAYOF .- ?,~/ -., ~ ..- ~ . 1998 AFTER MOTION, SECOND AND MAJORITY VOTE FAVORING ADOPTION. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA f~ Deputy Clerk / BA~AI~.~,-B~ I~ERkY, C¥~irn~,'~~''k $ ~ g,',,', t:.:"? Approved as to form and Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney h,'lcp~O8 RCS, A DA Grievance Procedures , , ,, ~ i,,i,, ii i IIIIIIII I IIIII I III IIIIIIIII III IIIIIIII II III I III ....... i ....... I 5 Date: March 26, 1998 To: Diane Flagg, EMS Director From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Ochopee Fire Control District Grant Request Enclosed please find one original document as referenced above, Agenda Item ~16D5, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on March 24, 1998. If you should have any questions, please contact me at: (8406). Thank you. Enclosures FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2-20-98 : 4. DA~E ~EC(IYED IY FEDERAL AQ~H~ F~/I ~llf~r O Town~p K ~lln O ~11111 ~11~ OIh~ fJ~C~)' I. NAMI OF FED[gAL ~llier County GIIII Dill Ending Date I Apricot ~ b P,~ICl : ~/~ I F~M ~ '3,; 835.42 .OD I. YES THIS PREAP~AT~AP~AT~ WAS MA~ AV~E TO b *~.m S 3~835.42 .oD N/A DATE c Stale I .0O N/A b ~ ~ PR~M IS ~T COVERED BY E O. 12372 N/A ~ ~ ~ HAS ~T BEEN N/A gnI gUvWnNf~ !~OF THE ~F~E~T AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY ~TH THE A~ACHED ASSURANCES IF T~' ~ -' ~ -' ~ ~ [ z .. . . 8 8 8 8 ~ z 'D 0 " ' ' . . ~ OMI APPrOval No, 0341-0040 ASSURANCES -. NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS Note= Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to )'our project or progr-~m. If ynu have please contact the awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require questlnns. to certify to additional assurances. Il'such is the case, you will be notLqed, applicants As the duly authorized representative of the a_~o__plicant [ certify that the a.._.p.ppllcant: !. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal (el[he Drug Abuse Circe end Treatment Act of assistance, and the institutional, managerial and ]972 (P.a. 92-255), as amended, relating tn financial capability (including funds sufficient to nondiscrimination on the baals of drug al)use. (13 pay the non-Federal share of project costs} to the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholi.~m ensure proper plannir~g, management and com. Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act pletion ofthe project described in this application. 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relatl.g In 2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller nondiscrimination on the baals of alcohol uh,~e nr General of the United States, and if appropriate, alcoholism; (g) §§ 523 and 527 of the Pul)Iii the State, through any authorized representative, Service Act ell912 (42 U.S.C. 290 dd.3 and 290 ce. access to and the right to examine all records, 3), ns amen'~led' relating to confidentiality of books, papers, or documents related to the award; alcohol and ds'ug abuse patient records; (hi Title and will establish a proper accounting system in ¥111 or the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C § accordance with generally accepted accounting 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to non. standards or agency dlrec(ives, discrimination in the sale, rental or ~nancinl~ of housing; (il any other nondiscrimination 3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees provisions in the specific statute(s) under which from using their positions for a purpose that application for Federal as~istance is being re,de; constitutes or presents the appearance of personal and (j) the requirements of any other or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain. nondiscrimination statute(s) which may' apply tn the application. ' · 4. Will initiate and complete the work within the 7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of requirements of Titles Ii and !11 of the Unif()rm the awarding agency. Relocation Assistance and Real Property 5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.I,. gl-6461 Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4§ 4728-4763) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of relating to prescribed standards for merit systems persons displaced or whose property is acqt, ired a~ for programs funded under one of the nineteen a result of Federal or federally assisted prngrum.~. statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of These requirements apply to ali interests in real OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel property acquired for project purposes regardle.,~ Administration {5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F). of Federal participation in purchases. 6. Will comply with ali Federal statutes relating to 8. Will comply with the provisions of the italch Acl nondiscrimination. These include but are not {5 U.S.C. 41 1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which iimlt limited to:ts) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of the political activities of employees who.~e 1964 (P.L. 88.3§2} which prohibits discrimination principal employment activities are f, mled in on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b} wholeor in part with Federal funds. Title IX of the Educe[ion Amendments of 1972, as 9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provi,i.n, of amended (20 U.S.C. 4§ 1681.1683, and 1685.1685), the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 276a to 27~h~ which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; 7), the Copeland Act (40 U.~.(~. 4 27~: mtd 18 (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of i 973, as U.S.C. 4~ 874), and the Contract Work :louts and amended (29 U.S.C. $ 794), which prohibits dis. Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 1§ 327.333), cram§nation on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age regarding labor standards for federally as~i~t(,d Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 construction subagreements. U.S.C.§§ 610'1.-.6107), which prohibits distrain. ina[ion on the basis ofage; ,~lamla,,f r-(~m 4~) l0 I I SSt Authorized for Local Reproduction '10. Will ¢o,nply. il' applicable, will, (hm,I in~,rnnce 13. Will assist the nwsrdlng ~gency in assuring p.rcha~e req.ireme.[~ o~ fiectio. 102(.) o[ the co~npliance with Section 10G of the National FI~ [)iaaa[er i'ro~ecti.. Ac~ o[ IgT3 {1',1.. 93-234} Ili~orlc I~reserv.iio. Act o[ I966, ae amend~ which require, recipient~ in a ~peclel flood ha~ard U.8.C. 4TO), BO 11593 (identification end area to parUcipate in ll~e program andto p.rchale proLec[ion o~ historic properLie~), end ~uod insurance lithe total colt o[ in~urable Arclmeolugicai and ili~[oric Pre~eryaUon Ac~ c.n~tr~ctlon and acq~isltio, is $10.000 or more. 1974 (iff U.SC. 4~ga-I et leq.). ,. I I Will comply with environme.tal ~ta.dards which 14. Will comply witl~ I'.L. 93.348 re~ardinE the may he prescribed ptzr~.ant to the [ollowing: (n) protecUu, o[huma, subjec~ involved in research, in~itutinn o[ enviro~men~al q.ali~y co.trul developme. L and related activltlee ~up~r~ b~ mea~.res .unde~ U~e ~etio.al Bnviro.mental this award ores~i~tmnce. Policy Act o[ lg~g (1'.1,. gl-lg0) end B~ecutive Order (BO) 11514; (h) nolificatlon o~ vlola~ing 16. Will comply with the Le~ratory Animal Wel[ere [.cilities p.r~qent to I':() 11738; (c) I~rutecihm .[ Act oE IgGg (P.i,. 89.644, e~ emended, T U.S.C. wetle.dt pl~rsuen~ t. I,:(1 I Igg(h (d) evah~eG.~ .[ 2131 eL aeq.) pertahdng to tl~e care. handling, end fiond haxerde in ~oodplni.~ i~ aec.~da~ce with El) treatme. L o~ warm blooded enimell held For 11988; (e) a~-rance of prnjnet c()nniale.cy with research, teachinR, or other Ictivit~ee .up~rted by the approved State ma.ageme.t program .. this awed developed under the Coastal Zone Ma.ngeme.t 16. Will cum~l/will, the Lead-~aeed Paint Poi~ning Act or 1972 {16 U,SC. ii 1451 eL neq); (f) i'reventio. Act(42 U.5.~. ii 4801 et eeq.) which c°nr°rmilyorFederelnction~t. State (Clear Air) prohibiZg the uae or lead baJed paint In Implementation Plans.nder~ectiun 17G(c) of U,e constr.ction or rehabilitation o[ residence Clear Air Act or 1955, n~ amended (42 U.~.~. J ~tructuree. 7401 et ~eq,); (g) protection o[underground eourcee o~drinking water under the ~efe Drinking Water 17. Will cauee to he performed the required financial Act of 1974, aa amended, (P.I., 93.523); end (h) and compliance audite in accordance with the protection or endangered npeciee under the ~lngle Audit Act or1984. Endangered Specie~ Act ~ 1973, ns emended, (P,I.. 18. Will comply with all applicable requirements 93-205), other Federal laws. executive ordere, regulatione 12. Will comply with the Wild and ~e.ie River~ Act and ~licle~ governing thio program. or 19~8 (tO U.S.O. It 1271 et neq.) related to protecUng com~nents or ~tentiel com~nente of the national wild and ~eenle rivers ~ystem. ~GNAIUR[ OF AUTHORIZED CE RI'IItYING O~'rlCIAL ~ . ~ -- ~ ~ IColliec County ~ho~e rice' Cont¢ol District ~ ~cch 10, ~a~8 , ,.~ "' / , . .. ~ ~ ' . , ~.~, 16D 5 February 1, 1996 RCFP - recslshr, app REQUEST FOR COST SHARE APPROVAL TO: Direclor, ._Ua.nk.~.Gcaham Florida ~iv~sion or ~or~slry t,, The Ochopee Fica Control District " (Name o! Loc~rnmenl) _reque$1s your approval for Ihs coal-share purchase of Ihs following Ilaled llama of equlpmenl and/or Irelnlng, or such porliona Ihereof, a~ may be approved, nol to exceed Ihs purchase price as slaled herein: llama of Equlprnenl Unll Tolal Communlly and/or Training Qua.lily Cost Cosl Io Receive i. PE-2U(J Potter)La ................. --3--- Radios ~l't~t~-/5'--$5~6.25 'Ocho~,e~TTrg Con:roi Diet Aegis Dlgi:al Voice 3 $ 210.00 ~" 630.00 Ochop~e rice Leather Cases w/Belt Loop 3 Swivel $ 50.40 $ 151.20 Ochopee Fire Control DIa~: Single Unit Rapid Chargers 3 $ 96.00 $ 192.00 Ochopee Fire Con:to! Dkst High Capacity Batterys 3 $ 100.80 $ 302.40 Ochopee Fire Control Dis: Pro, ram Radios 3 $ 50.OO $ 150.00 Ochopee Fire Control Dis: i dry. 3 $ 20.95 $ 62.85 . t ~ & Ochopee Fire Co~bcol Dial ~e~ereby acknowledge Ihal Ihs populallon of Ihs above named Indivk~ual commu.nlly(a) does nol exceed 10,000, $7,~670.85 Furthermore, we under, land Ihal Ihla Is a 60 percenl rnaxL,'num coal-share program (CooperaUve Fore, by A~l~l~nce Acl of 1978, PL 96-313), and ~al funds on de all u p~ce o~ ~e llama a oroved ...~,~. ............. ~ p Io ~0 percent of ~e aclual llenm to be purchased are Io be ~.Y_I._lJ~, and all unencumbered funds aa ~a~ dale ~'~ealencumbered by ~ ~e com~tle~ ~3 our project. We ~ur~er under. Dale -- _Collier Coun:v 8oard of Cc~,,,i~.s~one~s fit requeal la for training, itemize Ihs [ollowlng: · · .2 ~ g,Roo~ a~lo' 8oerd A 4.' >'~', TUition ' .~ '~'~ _ ~ ~ 5~ '..Salary (~,'id tlr~fi~'g~iers only) /ount¥ AT'I ~'".l ': ~:', DW[ i,r 'E. BROCK,. Cartl£1cs~lom Regarding I)ebaz~en~, fusi~snelon, and Other Rssponsibllit;¥ Kat~ers . Primer~ Covered Tr~nwmc~ion~ ~,, ~i. certification Is re~/red ~ ~e re.lA,Lens L~lemen~ing Sxe~Jye Order 1154~, Dab&~n~ ~d Suspension. 7 C~R Plr~ 3017, Section 3017.510, Pir~/cip~s. responsibilities. tho ~ul~ 30, l~lJ, Federal re~lm~ions M~ ~ ob~lined ~ con~eC~ing Depar~en~ of Agrl~lturo agen~ offering the pr~osed covered tr~sac~ion. (BEFO~ C~L~I~ CHRTZ~I~TZON. (l)~O prospective prL~ Participle cercLfiol ~o ~ho ~eC of i~e ~ovlodgo ~d ~l/ef, thac i~ ~d its principals= . (a} are no~ presently debarred, suspended, Pr~osed for de~ment, declared ineligible, or vol~ril~ excluded Federal depar~ent or agen~ (b) have no~ within a ~hree-~ear convicted of or h~d a cavil Jud~en~ rendered ~alns~ th~ for c~iaaion of fr~ud or a criminal ogfenae An co~ec~l~ ~lth obtaining. a~te~ing ~o obtain. tr~sac~Jom or ccn~rac~ ~-& m ~tmllC ~ra. sac~/on~ v/ola~ion of 1. Federal or $Ca~e ~Cl~sC ~hef~, forge~, bri~, ~alsi~Aca~i~ or des~c~i~ of records, making ~alse s~ate~nca, or receiving stolen pr~er~y; (c) are no~ Presently indicted for or o~he~lse criminally or civilly charged ~ a 9ove~n~al entity (Federal, SCa~e or ~a14 vi~h c~isslon of ~y o~ ~he olfenses engraved in paragraph (1)(b) o~ ~his cer~lficA~ion; ~d (d) have nec within a ~hree-year peri~ precedin~ ~his a~licati~/pr~sal had ~e or ~re P~ILc ~r~aicCiona (Federal, 8~a~e or ~cal) ~e~/na~ed for cause or default. (2) ~ere ~he prospective pr/~ par~iclp~ Is ~le ~o cer~igM to ~Y og ~he aCa~emn~a In ~hls cer~/fica~/oa, su~ prospective ParCicip~ shall a~ach ~ e~l~a~lon Co this pr~osal. ~llie~ ~~~d o~ C~issioners ~ho~e Fire Con~ol Dts~tc~ Org~i=atl~ ~ A~E ST~ f..~' ' DWIGH~ E'. ,'BROCK,:~ ~:~ I ~~County Atto, ney . .'. ,,.1~ , " 160 5 O~Z APPROV'AL HO.0~I . 000:Z U.~. DEPJ~ OF A~ICOI,'Z'Ot~ Cmt?XffXCATZO# ILlaAJU~XlC~ ~im cerci~icac/~ tm re.ired ~ ~e re~lic/~l /~l~nc/ng Soccl~s SISX-SIgO o~ the ~g-Free Uor~lace ~C o~ 191~ (~ L. 100-~0. TLCls V, S~cicle D; 41 O.8.C. 701 Et Ioq. J, 7 C~ Parc 3017, 8~la F, 31. l~19 ~ ~ (piglo 4~t7-4~S9). C~toi et tho re~lltl~l obCiined ~ concmcCing Oho Deplane et ~rt~lCure mgen~ offering Ohm gr~c. (A) ~o gr~cee cerciftil C~C ic rill provt~ ~ ~g-tree vor~lice (a} ~lish/ng a ItateMnc notifying e~l~eel t~C ~he ~la~ul ~u~ac~ure, die~ri~/~, dispensing, POaeeaalofl or use of con~rolled s~s~ce Lo prohibited In the ~r~ee's vor~lace ~d specifying ~he acc/~s ~ vail ~ C~en against e~l~ees for violation o~ su~ pr~ib/~i~; (b) lfc~lishing i ~g-freo irateness pr~r~ to I.n~o~ ~l~eeo (1) ~o ~goro o~ d~g ~fe in Ohm vor~lace; {2) ~e gr~cee'f ~li~ of ~iflcaifllng a ~g-froo ~r~la~; (~ ~e penalties ~ ~Y ~ i~eed ~ ~l~ees for ~ ~se viola~i~s ~rring in ~e wor~la~ (c) ~ia~ i~ a re~ire~n~ ~ ea~ ~l~ee ~o ~ engaged ia ~e Perforce of ~he gr~ ~ given a c~ of ~he e~a~ac re. ired para~r~h (a) ~ (d) No~ifyln~ ~he ~l~e in ~he s~a~e~n~ re~ired ~ ~ragr~h (1) ~i~ ~ ~e ~em of the sta~n~ ~d [21 Notify ~he e~l~er of ~Y criminal ~g ~a~u~e c~vic~im viola~i~ OC~rrla9 ~e the ~r~lace no la,er ~ five such c~vlct/~; 1 la) I~otifying the agency ~lthia ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (dj (2) tram afl ef~loyee or othe~ise receiving octal notice of eu~ convicti~; (~l T~ing one of the following active, eithin 30 ~ye of receiving notl~ ~dar mu~a~agraph (dj (31. with rof~ct to ~y e~l~ee ~o il es coflvAccod. * (~) T~ing appreciate per,~ol acti~ against ,u~ ~ ~l~o. ~ to ~d including toilette/ (2) Ro~iring au~ ~l~e to patriciate ~,e ,,eiot~co or ro~llita~l~ pr~r~ a~ro~d for pu~ooe. ~ a eo~ral. State. or l~al health, law o~or~t, or other appr~rlate agon~; If) ~tng a g~ fai~ effort to c~tinuo to uor~lace thr~gh l~l~ntatim ~d (f). ' '. .. (R) ~e gr~to, shall insert in the space p~idad pereo~ce et work d~e In c~oction with the fpecl~Lc ~t. place of Perforce (Street ed~ooo, city. c~ty, orate, sip c~) ,:',. ' [,cert[gtcatt~ .et ~t ~ page. I ~ 3. 3...~e certificati~ set ~t ~ page, [ ~ ~ iea ~tertal repreeeatati~ of . tact ~ vhi~ reXA~ce was p~aced ~ea gF~:. Xg it ~s later ~te~Aned ~t ~ gr~tee ~Ang~y ~en~ a ra~ee ~rtAe~catl~, or othe~Aae violates ~e o~g*Free wor~laco ~t, the agent, In a~iti~ to ival~le to the FeStal ~ve~nt, O~g-ffree Uor~lace ~t. 16D § CERTIFICATION FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS The undersigned certifies, Io lhe best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: ti) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf o~ Ihe uflderllgned, I0 any person lot intluenclhg or attempting to Influence an officer of employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection wih the awm'ding o! any Federal contract, the making of any' cooperative agreement, and the exlenslort, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperalive agreement. (2) II any funds other Ihan Federal appropriated funds have been paid ~'will be paid Io any person for Inlluenclng or attempting Io Influence an officer or ymployee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperallve agreement, Ihe undersigned shal/ comp/eta and subm/t Slandard Form-LLL, 'Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying*, in accordance with/ts Instructions. (3) The undersigried shall require thai the language of Ihle certlficalion be included ~ the award documents lot' all sub.awards at all liars (including sub-contracts, sub-grants and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and Ihal all sub-recipients shall certify arid disclose accordingly. This certilication is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering iflto lhis transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31 U. S. Code. Any persoll who falls to file Ihe required certlficalion shall be subject to a civil I~_ natty ol not less than $10,000 and no( more Ihan $100,000' f? each such failure. , ;"'Dwi 'r E,' cy 02/2':/199, 11:17 9417329020 P~'~ 82 ':=:lie OMMUNICATIONS INT I (~1)~535o (407)Q64-25~ (407)~9-9316 (~4) 76!-0990 (~1)732-11~ (813)66} 1888 AdSe~ P.O. Box 25 ' ~one (941~954114 ~ F~ (~1~95-3473 Z~ 34141 Dale 0~19~J I ~ ~ EQUIP ~E $7.421 65 S~[~ T~ , ~E $7.421.85 02/23/1,998 !4:25 94~7329020 pAr',.~ 64 · ' [6D 5. LPE-200 Series Radio EDACS® 800 MHz '.' . ~ ".' ;' ;..;': ..,.;.'t't.'; ; ,":~, .,,.r, ~'."---~-L (~m"''''~'':~'~'''r-' ' "~' '"':n"--~'"~ d'- ": ""' ' ...... '"' ":' '~ ;"'" '""': """ ' '"'" ~ ~, . ~ ,,,', · ',.'. , ,'.,.,,'..~.. ,,. m .::'~..: . .., . '..: !..:..L'. ': t& £P£.200 poeM* radio fa, h prq. ..:.,.< ,, ~,,, .'~ . ..., .,, .::,..: ,:..... l ,.. .~..~..~ ... .... ., ; , .' ~.... :~ gr, a,,c, td to Ivork o~ all ~xLsting FDAtC$ ,, . . ....: . . ... ! tr#nkd 0¢ ton~ntion~l ;y;mru. Criti~l " '...' · . ' , .:',:' ,' ." . ., .. /.,' i'~ .:';, . .. ,,,,,/;.-,. M-,,,t, a. ~,Jfi,/;da'/~F ""' "' '" ' ''~' '> ':.:?.i ': " graramaM, /~' added ffficie, Ct 4 °l~rk' tion. ' ~rodu~ General : communications reKh of y~ur lSency or field upgrad~tbility, ~nslicy The LPB-2~ w~ d~iBned to ~ t~e fl~t. The LPg-200 tin uo~ ninet2-nlne inability and e~cion ca~ilit cx~citio~ oCcusto~ world-wi~ individ~l call ~ human Of tel~ho~ thc ~[-2~ I ~e Small ind lightweight, thc LPE-200 Pr~ inte<onnect n~n in memo~ ~r s~- ~lue to y~r comm~i~tionl s~tem. wides s~ific~ion$ ~d ~r~ce ~u~ tom. riot to ~n~ luser ~nd h~vi~r ~i~l. A ~J~ ~ Tlehnolo~ molded ~l~=~b~te.blend c~ ~ound~ ~ m~l cutin$ cnibli~ the ~io U~n c~ ~tomi~ their ~i~ cost- pr~u, [~ LP~ to withstand ye=n ofdem~ndin$ u~. e~ctively with Ecicnoo'e ~li~ ~. %chnology. ~Jl uniq~ ~c LPE.2~ not only ~ Eric~'s ~rc o~rin$. S~Jn8 with ~k ~io pr~<u ~ in~ut by de~dinj accele~t~ li~ t~[, it al~ ~u~, ~ ~n b~M C~C~ conflgu- of ~h ~ ~ ~M ~j~ion, ~ MiJita~ Standard 810 C,D ~ E. ~tiooi by p~ln$ vilue-pfic~ ~- alJowio$ y~ to ~d new ~ums w~e b~dl~ or ~ ~n ~ from I [~hnologi~ ~ you ~d them. HIM-worMnl Ind R~i/ble j liR ofindMdml ~. ~t Thc LPE-2~ ~1o fl~ to the ch~l~qcl mn c~ ~y w~ choy n~ c~y lnd For Mom Info~aflon of c~ work en,ironment. ~h S~t~m hsvc the c~bili~ to ~ ~um u their ~ ~ in~Joa ~ut and ~ln venionl cln ml~e up to ~ n~ c~$e ~d t~it bud~ts allow, other t{icmn Pd~ ~io S~ms tions I~ up to 2~ c~nti~al c~- Built-In ~U~ Fr~ ~uJ& the U~. m~. U~ ~n confiBu~ tM EDA~ Should In LP~2~ ~ Imf ~ mo~n, the · 1-80~2~7-8~ sDt~ma$~u~ to ~ their s~ific~ ~io c~ ~ e~bl~ or di~l~ th~h ~ r~ulrcmencs. ' ~ S~tem ~er. This ~ilJ~ helps Thc LPG-200 ~;o is ci~ of {nitt- ~nt untuthori~d monitorin8 of etin$ or ~eivJn$ telep~n¢ oath. ~i$ criticli ¢ommunJcatiom I~tem. fnture tau improve the C~cien~ Ind ERICSSON 02/23/1398 1,1:26 9417329020 P~;'~ 05 : 16D .5, Input Voi~: Vibration: ~d ~ Po~t~ (W,ttO' 0 ~-~ 5 G (~r U.S. For~s~ ~ic~) F~ue~ St,biht~ ' ~.)O'C to +~'C; +2~ ~0(PPM). ~1.5 i M~ct Drop (~r EIA) PM Hum A~ Dim~nsion~ (Hx~xD): (C~mp,nmn ~cc;~,) (dg~ -40 ~s~ K~bs ~nd An~nna Audio ~e. + ~, '~ dB ~i~ ~gh ¢~aclcy b~c~ , S~mus A~ Hu~aicm (dBC): -) t ~.7" x 2.6" x L .7" Frequcncz ~ru~n (MHz)~ Full ba~w~ch : <~% ~t rued .ud~ ~ t~ Hz. ) kHz de~i~e~n (~44 x 67 ~ 4~ mm) ' Audio ~ith ~cr, ~h c.p,ci~y buce~ ' . ' 7": ....::,. ;,,,,.'. · , ,.x ' "~"' ~': .... "· "; ' R~e~ver.,' .o,,..,'; '; ',. ''~ ~:,' .'. ~ ':'/; ..... · ...." .... .... ".,,,~..r' ~.~..~'.. ~; .~ '." 62"X2.6"~ 1,7" , ' (1~7 s 6~ x 4~ mm) ~00 ~eight: Pr~q~len~ ~n~e (MHz). 85 ~70 2080~ O89~) ~ith cxtri ~sh cmpici~ battc~: 12 dB SIN~ (uV): 0 28 22.0 oz (624 G) ~leccivi~y Ba~e~ Life (~ 5/5/~): ~ 12.~ ~z (dB)N~PAC: -20 ~iSh ca~ci~ batte~: 8 hr. ~ 2) kHz (dB): -72 Extra high c~mcity buret: 9 hr. lnt~rm~ululen (dB): -72 S~ri~m And lm~e ~je~;on (dB)?m -70 ~bien~ Temp. Range: ~(~uen~ S~ab;Ihy -22~ co + 140~F (.)0'C co +~'C: +25 ~ (PP~): (-~O~C Co +6U~C) Fre~ency ~cmn (MH~); Pull Bl~w~zh O~euion~; ~5,~ ft (4,572 ~) ~T~OARO U.~. MIL-STO 810E Meth~r~uee*~ in Teans~t. 50,~ ft ( 15,240 m) ~lor (cae): H~h Tcm~ts~ )01.)/1, 2 BIKk ~w Tcm~umc 5023/I.2 .... s ........ .~ ........ ~..., l~ S.. He~gc, ~irpi~e, ~motc Mkropho~ , Bio.in8 ~m ~.~/1 ~ Prog~min8 ~f~Ett ~ Cabl~ H~idi~ ~07.~12 (C~h S) ~bmi~sture Su~elUencc Accufit: ~t Fo~ ~.~/I ~, $tti~, ~lt ~ps snd S~ivel Bl~i~8 DuK ~10.~/! Mounts Vibration 514.~/1 CAT I. I0 Dc~k and W~i Chitgen S~k 516,411,4 · ~ ~ts ~I~cnt MIL~ 810 ~D ~lnle MHz (W~) Sbb.(PPM) ~m~e FCC Rules Numar 8~-~9 0.~.} i.~ ~A~-~)6-A 22. ~ e ~ s~cifi~t~m ~r TI~IA.~) u~ ~hc~e no~. ee Meu~ed ~ ~ ~I6B P,i~cc ~io Symmt EDA~ I~, .giKc~d t~k Ly~h~rB. VirBini~ 24~O2 01~ Erkl~n i~. 160 5 · , AMERICAN PAGING 2'1'1~ TAMIAMI TRAIl. NORTH '. · NAPLES, FL $4102 EVER(~LADE8 FIRE DEPARTMENT LT. TOM MITCHELL FAX # 695.FIRE AMERICAN P,~,GING'S desire Is to provide you willl',a modern program designed specifically for your needs al a very affordable price. SERVICE AGREEM~NT HIg3HLI~HTS' 1. Qualily ten/ice and excellenl coverage. 2 24 Hour Customer Service. 3. Stale of the Art products. 4. One or Iwo year agreemenls available. 6. Money back Oueranteell Item -'~"~------'------- AIphanumedo 8tatewlda Pa~gam ............. P~'~ Insurance-Losl, Slola~l & Wa--t~'~'-' ........ _ Damage ¥oloemall · ~.. ........ Please oall me with any questions. Thanks Sincerely, .DAWN POWELL RYAN Nap!aa Account Execulive Pager: 941-99g.1900 16D ~ ADVISOR ELITE'" Word Moooogc Pc]~lcr DISP LAY II Fi,I.:X ()Jil~r 16Gi BOARD ()F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE MARCH 24. 1998 FOR BOARD ACTION: 1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FII.E FOR RECORD WITIt ACTION AS DIRECTED: 2. Minutes: A. Beach P, cnourishment/Maintcnancc Committee - agenda of March 5. i 998. Referred to i?,CC. 13. Code Enforcement Board. South - minutes & agenda of Novembcr 14. 1997. Referred to BCC. C. Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council - minutes of December 17. 1997. January 28. 1998 and agenda of January 28, 1998. Referred to BCC. D. Environmental Policy Technical Advisory Board - agenda of February 19. 1998. Referred to GCC. E. Golden Gate Beautification Advisory Committee - minutes of December 9, i 997 and agenda of January 13, 1998. Referred to BCC. F. Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee - minutes of August 25, 1997 and October 27, 1998. Referred to BCC. G. ltistorical/Archacological Preservation Board - minutes of JanuaD' 10. 1998 and agenda of February 20. 1998. Referred to BCC. Ii. immokalec 13cautification M.S.'F.U. Advisory Committee - minutes of JanuaD, 21. 1998 and agenda of Fcbruar)' 18. 1998. Referred to GCC. I. Lake Trafford Restoration Task Force - minutes of December 5. i 997. September 26, 1997, May 23. 1997. January 9. 1998 and agendas of May 23. 1997 and January 9, 1998. Referred to GCC. .l. Library Advisor), Board - minutes of December 17. 1997. Referred to BCC. K. Ochopee Fire Control District Advisor), Board - minutes of November 3. 1997. P, eferrcd to GCC. 1.. Pathway Advisory Committee to Naples MPO - minutes of Janu try_ 16. It)OR nncl agenda of February 20. 1998. Referred to BCC. AGENDA I,!EM NAR 2 q 1998 Pg ..... , , ,,,a~H~ ~ I iii i II IIIII I I II I IIIII I III IIIII IIII II M. Pelican Bay M,";TBtl Adx'isorv Committee - minutes ofJa,mary 7 and January 28. 1()98 and agenda of February 4. lOgS. Referred to BCC. N. Plmming Commission - minutes of December 18. 1997, January. 8. 1998 and J.'muary 15. 1998 and agenda for Fcbruao' 5 & 19. 1998. Re[erred to BCC. (). Productivity Committee - minutes of January 21, 1998. Referred to BCC. 3. ()thor A. l";ctmomic l)cvclopmcnt Cot, ncil's Quarterly Economic Diversification and Bt,si,mss Assislance Report. l,',cferrcd to I?,CC. B. l.etter dated March I 0. 1908 from Michael A. Welsh. Controller, Collier ('ountv Tax Collector's f)ffice, referencing Ct, rrcnt Ad Valorem Tax & Non-Ad Valorem Assessment to the BCC after Tax Collector's commissions and distribution recap showing year to date totals of taxes collected net of discount tbr 1993. 1004. 1995. 1996 and 1997. Referred to BCC. AGE ND,A II'EM MAR 24 1998 pg. ~ ~{-,~ NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ~ /~///~/&~ Tel. 941.434.4655; Suns om 974 46~ ' No. 941.434.3059; ema~ naplesnrm~naplesnet ·com NOTICE OF P~LIC ~ETING The Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Committee announces a public meeting to which all interested persons are invited. DATE: Thursday 0B March 1998 TIldE: 9:00 A.M. ~ ' 35 , . , PLACE: City Council C..amsers, 7 Eighth Street South Na~ies Florida 34102 AGENDA 1. Rtl! Call. 2. Changes to agenda. 3. Consideration of approval of the minutes of the 08 January and 12 February 1998 meetings. 4. Project updates: A) South Channel/Water Turkey Bay dredging; B) rock removal project (see appended 19 February memo, Huber to Ilschner). 5. Quarterly budpet update. 6 Discussion of the Incremental Beach Maintenance and Management Plan, including proposal for larger sand stockpile from Bonita Grand Sand Co. 7. Discussion of timing for T-groin and pile cluster groin p_.mltting and construction. 8. Discussion of committee restructuring. 9. Agenda for next meeting, 02 April 1998. 10. Open public input. 11. Adjourn. FCF:'.~L ATTila: ~%':' .~-2 TA~.,N C:: A-':Y :T,,~'. 2'£:L'J2-Li iF Aii.,i T2 THiS AC..-:~iA. A.::':' FEF£S:: wk'~ '-:-i'2,,S ii .~.:.:-LAL ;._'7:' irT:SiT:: :.:%1'-- 5':' ?HiE '.C:..":iT.-E., WiTH .:EiF,,:T .'~ FFi:.,Eii::Ui .L':i "¥" UE.,2 Ti r,:c.':.- TEAT A SEF'.'iiES F? :HiS :.:-2--71::G :.g<:' CALL .'FIE ii.-':' Ecr additional information, please contac5 Jon Staicer at 434- 4655. Jon/~'.-Srai~e,, Ph.~, Natural Resources Manager lv, isc. Corre : / Constant%ne , - II(;i'~:?'u/~{. · -- V/' November 14, 1997 (' '~ TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SOUTM~'~ Naples, Florida, November 14, 1997 Met this date at 8:30 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: RANDY E. MERRILL ROBERT K. LOCKHART GUY P. ADAMS DIANE TAYLOR RHONDA E. SAUNDERS MAURICE DeVITO JAMES E. LAVINSKI LEWIS P. OXLEY ALSO PRESENT: JEAN RAWSON, Attorney to the Board MARIA E. CRUZ, Code Enforcement Specialist LINDA SULLIVAN, Code Enforcement Director Hancock Page 1 , ~ ~ I I III I II II - ~m ........... III 0-28-1997 l(~:OSm.1 FR(~.~ 6~3 834S COD~ ~ORC~ ~O~D O~ ~LIER CO~, Dat~: Nov,mber ~4, 1997 at 8:~0 o'clock A.M. Location: Collier Coun:y ~overnm~n% Cen~er, Ad~. Bld~, 3rd Floor NOTE: ~ P~KSON WHO DECIDES TO APP~ A D~CISION OF ~IS BO~ WILL ~ A RECO~ OF ~E ~RO~ZNGS PERTAININ~ ~ERE~, ~ ~RE~RE ~Y ~D ~ ENS~ ~T A ~RBATIM R~CO~ OF ~ PROC~INGS IS ~, ~I~ ~CO~ IN~ES ~ TESTIMO~ ~ ~ZD~4C~ UPON ~I~ ~ ~P~L IS TO B~ B~ED. ~IT~ COLLIER CO~ NOR ~E CODE E~OR~E~ BOA~ $~L BE RESPONSIBL~ FOR PROVIDIN~ ~IS ~CO~. 2. APPROVAL OF A~ 3. APPROVAL OF M~S October ~0, ~997 4. P~LI~ H~NGS A. BCC vs. William H. Tost, II, and Betty Tost CEB No. 97-032 B. BCC v~. Elsie E. Hill and Staven R. Hill CEB No. 97-033 C. BCC vs. Felix Lerch Family T~st CEB No. 97-034 ~. REPORTS 8. ~:EXT M~E~IN~ D~.~ Janua~ 9, 1998 9. ~JO~N November 14, 1997 CHAIRMAN MERRILL: All right, folks, at this time I'm going to bring the Code Enforcement Board Meeting for the South Board, Collier County to order. I'd have -- we'll start with the roll call. Lynn Bradeen is not present. James Lavinski. MR. LAVINSKI: Present. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Rhonda Saunders. MS. SAUNDERS: Present. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Guy Adams. M~. ADAMS: Here. CHAIP~A/~ MERRILL: Maurice DeVito. MR. DeVITO: Present. CHAIP34AN MERRILL: Diane Taylor. MS. TAYLOR: Present. CHAI~4A-N MERRILL: Robert Lockhart. MR. LOCKHART: Present. CHAIP~3d{ MERRILL: Lewis Ox!ey. MR. OXLEY: Here. CHAI~J~N MERRILL: We do have a quorum. The approval of the agenda is provided in our booklets. Do I have a motion? MS. CRUZ: Mr. Chairman? CHAI~.t~N MERRILL: Yes. MS. CRUZ: For the record, my name is Maria Cruz, Code Enforcement Specialist. There is a change in the agenda. CHAI?24AN ~ERRILL: Okay. -MS. CRUZ: Item 4, Public Hearings, C, Case Number 97-034, we would like to request a continuance in that case. There is a trustee change and we need to renotice the respondent. CF~IRMA-N MERRILL: Continuance for n~tice? MS. CRUZ: Yes, sir. CF~IP~LkN MERRILL: Any objection from the board? (No response.) CP~I~43~N MERRILL: We'll continue ~hat matter. Put it on when you're ready. MS. CRUZ: Thank you. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Any other changes to the agenda? (No response.) CHAIRM3%N MERRILL: Hearing none, do I have a motion to approve? MS. SAUNDERS: So moved. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Second? MR. DeVITO: I'll second it. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRPIAN MERRILL: Hearing none, all those in favor, indicate by Any opposed? (No response.) Page 2 November 14, 1997 C.qAI~A~N MERRILL: Motion carries. Approval of the minutes from the October 10th, 1997 meeting of the board. Has everyone had an opportunity to review the minutes and are there any changes or corrections? (No response.) CHAI~4AN MERRILL: Hearing none, do I have a motion to approve the minutes? MR. DeVITO: I'll make a motion to approve the minutes. CHAI~.LAN .MERRILL: A motion has been made. Do we have a second? ~&R. LAVINSKI: I'll second. CHAI~N MERRILL: A motion has been moved and seconded. A motion has been moved and seconded. Is there any discussion on the motion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Hearing no discussion, all those in favor of the motion, indicate by saying aye. All opposed? (No response.) CF~I~kN MERRILL: Motion carries. Moving do'~ to public hearings. The first item on the public hearings under A is the Board of County Commissioners versus Wi!li~ H. Tost, II and Betty Tost, Code Enforcement Board Number 97-037. All those for that hearing, please come forward and be sworn. Gentlemen, are you ready? We're here in the Tost matter? ~R. HEDRICH: Yes, we are. Good morning. CHAiRMA_N MERRILL: Are we going to proceed to a hearing today? MR. HEDRICH: We'll proceed as planned. Ci~L%i~AN MERRILL: Okay. Then all those who may testify, please be sworn. Are you Mr. Tost? ~. TOST: I was asking for -- I was asking for a continuance on this is what I was doing. That's what I was talking to him about. I've got -- we've got to bring the paperwork and all the rest of the stuff in here for you all to review this thing, this happened. We're really -- MS. RAWSON: Mr. Tost -- CHAIR/4A2~ MERRILL: Mr. Tost, could you stand up by the microphone, please, so we can ge~ this on -- MR. TOST: I'm sorry. I didn't know you had one. MS. RAWSON: Mr. Tost, if you're going to ask for a continuance or testify, would you be sworn in, please? MR. TOST: Yes, ma'am. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAI~MAIq MERRILL: Mr. Tost, you're indicating that you want a continuance to provide additional materials? ~R. TOST: Yes, sir. We will -- the notice that came up when we got the sun%~ons for this thing, it was short. At the time we had also Page 3 ,, , , III lib IIIIIII I~1111111 ............... ' - ' - ' ' ~ ....... i~ 16G1, November 14, 1997 ready for -- to put my mother into the hospital and my dad is the one that's got the paperwork. He's the one that this property is in his name. He asked me to come here and explain it. What we're being charged with here is a 20-year-old violation. There is a lot more to this than you understand and I understand, but the paperwork is there, which clarifies this. We need to get it in here. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Perhaps for the record then, are you William H. Tost, II? MR. TOST: No, sir. I'm the third. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: You're the third. So, the respondent is actually not here today. MR. TOST: Yes, sir. My dad's not here. He couldn't make it, like I said. I live in Everglades City. CHAIR/4A/~ MERRILL: Code Enforcement, do you have an objection or position to Mr. -- MR. HEDRICH: I'll make a short statement. Ma'am? THE COURT REPORTER: Would you please identify yourself for the record? ~. HEDRICH: David Hedrich, investigator, Collier County Code Enforcement. MS. RAWSON: Mr. Hedrich, we probably should swear you in, too. CF~I~43~N MERRILL: I believe he was. MS. RAWSON: Oh, okay. Thank you. MR. HEDRICH: Since this case began, March of this year, I have had several conversations with Mr. Tost, II in reference to this property. Each time I've asked him to provide me any ~ype of information which might clear up this matter. And there again, since March of this year, I have not had any cooperation whatsoever as far as paperwork to be_ provided or anything of that matter. C?~IRbLAN MERRILL: And I~r. Tost has indicated that this is a situation that has gone on for years; I mean, the -- the alleged violation? MR. HEDRICH: Mr. Tost, II has indicated that over the pas~ 20 years he's used the property for the same type of uses, what is being conducted now. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Okay. Thank you. Does anyone on the board have any questions of either one of these individuals regarding the issue of whether to continue this matter? MS. SAUNDERS: Yeah. Mr. Tost, when was your mother put in the hospital? MK. TOST: She's going -- they're putting her in. They're ~aking her this morning to put her in there. MS. SAUNDERS: Now, was she healthy in March or in April when this -- I~R. TOST: No, ma'am. My mom's been do'~ for the last five years and she's progressively getting worse. MS. SAUNDERS: And your dad, is -- is he able to handle his o~ Page 4 November 14, 1997 affairs? MR. TOST: Yes, ma'am. My dad's a general superintendent. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Anyone else have any questions of -- I do. Would it be fair to say that -- that even though the Tosts have not provided you with paperwork, if in fact that exists, the -- considering the length of time this apparently has been out there, that a continuance for them without any further continuances before this board would not jeopardize the property or the safety of the citizens of Collier County? MR. HEDRICH: It would not. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: That was my question. Mr. Tost, you've come here -- MR. TOST: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: -- and asked this board for a continuance. MR. TOST: Yes, sir. CHAI~4A~; MERRILL: Based upon what Code Enforcement says, and I'm speaking for myself only at this time -- MR. TOST: Yes, sir. CHAI~4A/~ MERRILL: -- the only way I would consider giving you a continuance is with the understanding that there will be no further continuances. MR. TOST: Yes, sir. CHAI~4A_N MERRILL: You will have to have any paperwork that you have -- that you want to present to this board in compliance with the notice that you have received before the next board meeting if the board allows you to do what I'm telling you. Okay. I'm not speaking for the entire board. I'm speaking for myself. -MR. TOST: Yes, sir. CHAIRFJC~ MERRILL: That was -- that would be the only way that I would agree to that, all right, because it seems like you've had enough time to get that together to get it to Code Enforcement. Again, there's going to have to be a deadline. MR. TOST: I understand what you're saying, Mr. Merrill, but we have put up with this for 20 years out there. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: We'll try to bring -- M/R. TOST: It's not just Collier County. It's the federal goverrunent, the state government. This has become a 20-year nuisance. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Well, I think that's what Collier County might say also, but we're going to tackle that when the time comes, okay? MR. TOST: Ail right. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: I will make the motion that we do grant your continuance for the next board meeting with the understanding that there will be no further continuances on your behalf. MR. TOST: Fine. Like I said, if it doesn't go, then -- CHAIRMAN MERRILL: I don't know if I've got a second to that motiou, but that's my motion. MR. TOST: Okay. MR. DeVITO: I'll second that motion. Page 5 November 14, 1997 CHAI~4AN MERRILL: It has been moved and seconded. Is there any discussion by the members of the board? MS. TAYLOR: I disagree with it totally, totally. MfR. TOST: May I ask why? MS. TAYLOR: Because you've had plenty of time to get this all together. Mr. Hedrich has -- has requested and requested this information. It has been totally ignored. MIR. TOST: He has not been totally ignored. MS. TAYLOR: Well, he certainly has. MR. TOST: No, he has not. MS. TAYLOR: Have you given him the information he's requested? MR. TOST: I called him three or four times this week on the phone just trying to get an idea of what is going on. He's busy, we're all busy, but let me explain something to you. After you put up for something for 20 years from one object -- one person or another person or another person in the federal government, the state government or whatever, after awhile, you get tired of listening to it because nobody makes any sense anymore. So, we have a right to be the way that we are. You can disagree with it if you'd like. I don't care. That's your prerogative but, lady, you haven't been there, you don't understand the problem -- MS. TAYLOR: ?:ell, I can see -- MR. TOST: -- until you walk a mile in the shoes, then you'll understand how far it is. MS. TAYLOR: To not be in compliance, we're all wrong -- MR. TOST: The compliance -- MS. TAYLOR: -- and you're right. ~R. TOST: No, ma'am. I'm not saying we're right, I'm not saying we're wrong, but what I am saying is i have been there for 20 years. How come in a year it took you 20 years to find me there? Well, if that's whaz it takes to find the rest of them, they're going to be dead before you can clear it o=f Now, I'm here for a legitimate deal. I'm here because I bought this place. We bought it. ?;e've done something with it. There's acres out there that's -- nothing's been done with. And, yes, I am aggravated a little bit about it because i have busted my hump in there. CF~I?~; MERRILL: Anyone else on the board have any -- MS. SAUNDERS: Yeah. Mr. Chairman, it seems like we're getting some information here. We're here now. I would prefer actually to hear what we can on this case. At that point, if ,we don't have enough information, continue it or decide what we feel we need to do and then give the Tosts enough time to comply, but I would hesitate to just continue it without -- it seems like the information or at least a portion of it is here, and I'd like to give the Code Enforcement people a chance to e×~lain the cause because I don't understand it at this point. MS. TAYLOR: I agree. CHAI~4AN MERRILL: I understand what your position is, but if the Tosts are going to bring forward paperwork, that would actually -- it Page 6 16Gl November 14, 1997 puts both sides at a disadvantage if they submit it at the next meeting without having the opportunity for Code Enforcement to also respond to that material. So, it would put them at a disadvantage as well if we proceeded today or -- and then allow them to supplement the record later. ~R. TOST: Thank you. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: So, I mean, that's my position on it, that it's not really being unfair to one side or the other. It would actually be unfair to both. MS. SAUNDERS: Would it be fair to ask Code Enforcement to just outline the violation to us a little bit more, to explain, or is that getting into the hearing? MS. SULLIVAN: I don't think we should do that if we're not going to hear it, but I do have -- I just have one comment. The only objection I would have is if we are to continue this, I would prefer that we waive -- be able to waive notice and not have to go through that again and maybe get some kind of statement that Mr. Tost here is the representative of his father. THE COURT REPORTER: Would you please identify yourself for the record? MS. SULLIVAN: I'm sor-~Y. I'm Linda Sullivan, Code Enforcement Director. C?~I~3%N MERRILL: Mr. Tost, if we grant your request -- MR. TOST: Yes, sir. CHAi~43~N MERRILL: -- are you agreeable to waiving notice, which means that we won't have to -- we, being the Code Enforcement Board in the county -- won't have to go back and send you notice again that you've -- MR. TOST: Yes, sir. CHAIKMAN MERRILL: -- received notice verbally today for the next meeting? MR. TOST: Yes, sir. Al!s you have to do is give me the date. C~AI~AN MERRILL: And that you're a representative of William H. Tost, II and Betty -- MR. TOST: Yes, sir. C}~i~3%N MERRILL: -- Tost? You'll agree to that? MR. TOST: Yes, sir. CHAI~.tkN MERRILL: Is there any other discussion on the motion to continue? MR. OXLEY: Not on the motion, just on the photos when we get to that. C~IR~LAN MERRILL: Okay. I don't know that we'll get to the photos today. Right now we're going to decide whether we're going to continue it. If there's no more discussion on that motion, then I would call the question on the motion to continue. All those in favor of the motion to continue, please indicate by saying aye. All those opposed? MS. TAYLOR: Aye. Page 7 November 14, 1997 MS. SAUNDERS: Aye. · CHAIRMAN MERRILL: In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have The motion will be passed. It's continued to the next board meeting. Sir, I would caution you again, please have all your material in -- in the -- MR. TOST: Yes, sir. MS. SULLIVAN: Mr. Tost -- CHAIRM3%N MERRILL: -- at the appropriate time. MR. TOST: Yes, ma'am. MS. SULLIVAN: -- the next meeting is December 12th. I'm sorry. It's not the 12th? January 9th. I'm sorry. But could we get some idea from you when you will get this information to us? MR. TOST: Yeah. Let me get -- as soon as my dad -- I'll talk to him tonight and I will get him -- if we've got it -- he's coming over this weekend. I've got a hunting party this weekend. I'm going and I'm meeting him out there. We -- he will be there with the whole nine yards. MS. SULLIVAN: So we can get it within the next couple of weeks~ MR. TOST: Yes, ma'am. If I get it Sunday when he comes out, I'll get it to you Monday and you -- MS. SULLIVAN: Okay. MR. TOST: -- but I do have one thing about it is if we do, can we photostat it because I want the original back. This is the original. , ~ you MS. SULLIVAN: That's not a problem. We 11 make copies fo. o · MR. TOST: Okay. Thank you. CHAI~3%N MERRILL: Thank you, sir. MR. TOST: Is that all you-all need me for? CHAI~4AN MERRILL: Yes, sir. MR. TOST: I appreciate it. You-all have a good day. I'm out of here'CHAi~4JtN MERRILL: You, too, sir. The next item on the public hearings is Item B, Board of County Commissioners versus Elsie E. Hill and Steven R. Hill, Code Enforcement Board Number 97-033. All those that will be testifying in that hearing, please come forward and be sworn. Apparently we have three people? Would you swear them in, please? (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Could you please all identify yourselves, starting with code Enforcement? MR. HEDRICH: David Hedrich, investigator, Collier County Code En~orc~ent. CHAiRM;~ MERRILL: Ma'am? MS. HILL: I'm Elizabeth Weeks Hill -- CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Could you stand a little closer to that? Page 8 November 14, 1997 MS. HILL: I am Elizabeth Weeks Hill. CHAIP3ULN MERRILL: Thank you. Sir? MR. HILL: I'm Steven R. Hill. CHAI~4AN MERRILL: Thank you. Are you ready to proceed, both sides? I'm sorry. We'll have to have verbal responses because the court reporter can't take down -- MR. HILL: I am, sir. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: -- a nod of the head. Ma'am, are you ready to proceed? MS. HILL: Yes, I am. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Code Enforcement? MR. HEDRICH: Code Enforcement's ready. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Proceed. MR. HEDRICH: Back on May 27th, 1996, I first observed a violation located at the Hill property. The Hill property is described as 20202 State Road 29. The complaint that we received was registered by the Florida Highway Patrol and it referenced several different violations, one possible occupational licensing violation, a possible illegal land use and, third, a litter and abandoned property problem. On May 27th, the day of the first inspection, I first observed violations listed in your packet. Notices of violation were prepared and sent to the Hills. The first violation was for occupational licensing violation, Ordinance 8142, Section one. It was a prohibited land use violation from the Land Development Code 91102, amended 2.1.15, and the third violation, for litter and abandoned property, Coliier County Litter Ordinance 9147, Section 6, 7 and 8. The licensing violation was in reference to a salvage yard operation that was being run without the proper licensing along with repairing of vehicles that was being done, mechanic's work on vehicles being done without the proper licensing as well from Collier County. The prohibited land use reference to, and I believe we have a map in the packet here -- CHAI~kN MERRILL: Before we refer to the packet, could you please label the packet and offer that as an item? MS. CRUZ: I request this packet be marked Composite Exhibit A and be admitted into evidence, please. CHAI~4A/q ~ERRILL: Can I see that? Is that the one that's in our boOk?Ms. CRUZ: Yes, sir. That is the same packet that was provided to the board members and to the reporter. CHAIR~ULN MERRILL: Has it been provided to the Hills? MS. CRUZ: And also to the respondents, uh-huh. CHAI~ MERRILL: Could you show them the one that you're now referring to? Mr. Hill, if you would, and Mrs. Hill, is it? MS. HILL: Can I just stand one moment, please? I own the property. I lease it to Mr. Hill. I have asked Mr. Page 9 November 14, 1997 Hill to clean up his mess numerous times. My attorney is Jeff Quinn. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Okay, ma'am. MS. HILL: I was not aware he was serving -- doing the junkyard or anything else because I have an eviction notice on him. It's been in court for three years because he has put a pending case against me and the property. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Ma'am? MS. HILL: So, therefore -- CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Ma'am, excuse me. I don't want to cut you off but you'll get your opportunity to say all that. Right now we kind of go through things in sort of one step. Can you hold on just a second on that? The paperwork that you have in front of both of you, hav~ you had the opportunity to look through that? Have you gotten a copy of that paperwork? MR. HILL: Yes, sir. I've got a copy of this paperwork. The date of service was 11/12/97 at 10:47 a.m. at Horseshoe Drive. For whatever the reason, I was not served with this package until then, so as far as the defense package, you won't have a defense package but I'll try to give you as much information as I can. CHAIRF~N MERRILL: Okay. Very good, but you have received that package? MR. HILL: Yes, sir. That's correct. I picked it up in person on Horseshoe Drive. CHAI~4AN MERRILL: Okay. And, ma'am, have you received the package also? MS. HILL: I did not get my package until the -- until Friday. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: I understand that, but you have received it. MS. HILL: I have received it. Mr. Quinn -- CHAIP_MAN MERRILL: Do you have any -- do you have any objections to the introduction of the package as you see it into evidence at this point in time? MS. HILL: Like I said, I don't know what's going on because I have not been allowing to be on the property for three years. CF~IRMAN MERRILL: Okay. I'll take that as an objection. If you could go through the packet and we'll go through it step by step and see if there's any objection to any of the particular things in the packet. There's a -- the first thing is a notice of hearing. Have you-all received notice of today's hearing? MR. HILL: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Okay. Would there be no objection to the introduction of notice of hearing? MR. HILL: Correct. Sir, I -- I have no objection to this package. I've reviewed it. CHAIRMAN ~4ERRILL: Okay. Thank you, sir. MR. HILL: I -- I have no problem except for some of the content may not be completely accurate. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: That's why we're here for the hearing. I Page 10 November 14, 1997 understand that. As to the photographs that are contained in there, there are photographs, I understand, contained in there; correct? MR. HEDRICH: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: As to the photographs contained in there, is there any objection to the photographs? MR. HILL: The photographs here aren't clear, but I -- but I'm satisfied that they're correct. CHAI~dAN MERRILL: And to the attachments that were in there; specifically, the county ordinances, the memos and things like that, is there any objection to the introduction of those? MR. HILL: No, sir. I have no objection to the package at all. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Ma'am? MRS. HILL: No. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: The only thing we're really left with is the content of the affidavit of violation and the allegations in the affidavit of violation. ~{R. HILL: Yes, sir. CHAIRMgd~ MERRILL: Do you agree to that also, ma'am? MS. HILL: Like I said, I don't o~ the company. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Okay. All right. We'll take that as that portion of the packet with, obviously, the exception of the content of the affidavit of violation is then admitted. Is there any objection from anyone from the board? (No response.) CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Hearing none, you may proceed with your testimony on items in the packet. ~&R. HEDRICH: Thank you very much. ' Going back to the prohibited land use notice of violation, this was issued on the basis -- and, again, if you'll refer to your zoning map on Page 29 of this CEB case, you'll see a copy of the zoning map for the area. The area -- and I don't know how clear it is on your photocopies right there. And the area marked A slash ACSC with an ST is the area on which the Hill property is located. There's a small square outlined approximately in the center of that area. This zoning designation, A slash ACST -- ACSC/ST stands for area -- agricultural, area of critical state concern with a special treatment overlay. This zoning designation clearly prohibits anything, just about any use of this property, as far as the activities that are being conducted by Hill's Towing at that location. I checked with various planners in our planning department here in Collier County, Bob Mulhere for one, and even under a conditional use application, the chances of being disallowed would be nearly one hundred percent. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Would you please ex/plain further the zoning that would be permissible under -- or the activity, excuse me, that would be permissible under the current zoning for that parcel? MR. HEDRICH: In order to continue all the activities being Page 11 November 14, 1997 conducted at this time as far as salvage is concerned, that would need an industrial zoning, something would have to be conducted in industrial zoning. CHAIPd4A/~ MERRILL: ~at type of use is permitted for that area? Do you know? ~CR. HEDRICH: Under conditional use, there are various, such as farming. They do allow some farming in this agricultural area. We have a gentleman right now who's trying to obtain permission under a conditional use to do airboat rides and activities in this area. And there isn't very many other %hings that can be conducted. CF~IP24AN MERRILL: You'd indicated that you had gone out to the property and observed violations. Could you be more specific as to the violation that you're alleging regarding the salvage yard? What conditions did you observe that led you to believe that a salvage yard was in operation? MR. HEDRICH: Yes, sir. Under Collier County Litter Ordinance 9147, Section 6, 7 and 8, we cited the Hill property for litter and abandoned property. This litter and abandoned property at the first inspection contained well over one hundred abandoned automobiles. Ci~i~4AiJ MERRILL: ?~at was the condition of the automobiles as you observed them? MR. HEDRICH: Under abandoned automobiles, in order for us to cite under that, the vehicle must be in disrepair, not able to move or roll under its o'~ power at its present condition. M_R. OXLE¥: Are they being stripped? hR. HEDRICH.: The vehicles -- I observed numerous vehicles did not have tires, windshields, doors -- MR. DeVIl'O: Fenders? MR. HEDRfCM: -- different parts. Parts were missing, yes, sir. MR. DeVITO: Parts were missing. C~AIR/WOkN MERRILL: Was there any signage on the property indicating tu you that a business was in operation there? MR. HEDR[CH: The only sign, I believe, is at the entrance and it is marked Hili's Towing. MR. DeVI~C: Were there -- CF~I~4A/q MERRILL: I'm sorry. Go ahead. M~R. DeVITO: Were there any signs as far as junk%-ard or parts for sale or anything like that? MR. HEDRICH: No, sir. [~R. DeVITO: Nothing at all? MR. HEDRICH: No, sir. MR. DeVITO: No licenses? MR. HEDRICH: No licensing for salvage business or mechanical work or -- Mr. Hill has held a license for a wrecker service since the mid-eighties. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Did you check and see whether any of the vehicles had current registration? MR. HEDRICH: I wasn't able to do that. Page 12 16Gl November 14, 1997 MR. DeVITO: Was there free access into the area? MR. HEDRICH: The main entrance off of State Road 29 was the only entrance into the area. CHAIR/~AN MERRILL: ?~en you say you weren't able to do that, was there something that prevented you from doing that or you just weren't able to make that determination? MR. HEDRICH: Well, the vehicles in the piles did not have current license plates or any type of license plate that I could see. In order to obtain a VIN number to further identify the vehicles would have meant climbing around. CHAI~_AN MERRILL: I understand. My question was what -- you've answered it. ~{R. HEDRICH: Thank you. CF~I~3uN MERRILL: Whether they had license plates on t?:em. I didn't expect you to go and get confidential VINS from the frames. All right. You indicated that you had observed an illegal accumulation of abandoned property and litter. Could you please describe more fully what you observed out there that -- that is the basis of that allegation? MR. HEDRICH: Yeah. The -- the remainder of the abandoned property and litter referred to the piles of parts from the automobiles. The parts were taken and placed in various areas. Piles of tires from the automobiles, the old wheels, things of that nature, sat in different areas -- CF~I~_AN MERRILL: Are these -- MR. HEDRICH: -- around the property. CF~i~_~_N MERRILL: Are these in the out of doors ur are they covered in any manner? - MR. HEDRiCH: These were in the outdoors, uncovered areas of the property. Reference Page 20 of the packet, you can see a little bit through these black and white photos. The picture on the left, a tire laying in one area, a picture on the right were several piles of tires. MR. DeVITO: Was this area fenced in? MR. HEDRICH: Yes, it was. Yes, it was. We proceeded -- after the violations had been discovered and noted and photos taken, we proceeded to send the notices of violation. Contact was made with Mr. Hill. I had never spoken with Mrs. Hill until this date. I had -- I had some contact through her attorney. But we have had verbal conversations, Mr. Hill and I. He has been into the office for several meetings. We've thoroughly discussed the matter. We've written up several letters indicating that the violations are -- in fact, hold true and even back to the early eighties, according to what the zoning laws, regulations and rules were then, this was still a prohibited illegal land use to be conducted out there in that area. CH3~I~ MERRILL: That was my next question. Is there any time that tkis activity was not prohibited and it was being conducted out there by Mr. Hill or any predecessors? MR. HEDRICH: No, sir. Page 13 November 14, 1997 CHAI~4A/g MERRILL: Okay. Anything else? M2~. HEDRICH: Not at this time. If the Hills would like to proceed now. CHAIPdVIA/g MERRILL: Mr. Hill, we'll start with you. Do you have any questions of Mr. Hedrich? I~R. HILL: I'm probably going to bounce around a little bit. I probably won't fit the profile that I should. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Well, let me -- let me tell you how we'll set it out and maybe that will help you out. Right now what you have the opportunity to do is to ask him any questions that you might have. You have an opportunity to make any statements that you want to make and amend. MR. HILL: Okay. I -- no, I'll follow that. I may not have it all clear as far as the way it went down, the conversation. CHAI~4F~N MERRILL: But if you're going to ask him questions, I would ask you to direct questions to him. If you want to tell us something, that will come in just a couple minutes. Do you understand the distinction? ~{R. HILL: Well, if I address any questions, they will be to him. If I look at you and I talk to him, that's just the way it is. C]~!~tAN MERRILL: Okay. So, if you're going to ask him questions, go right ahead. ~.~. HILL: Okay. David and I have had several conversations. I think the first thing I want to do is make a brief observation, is that many times when they were sitting, talking to people, our co~T, unications aren't always clear in what we mean to say or do say, aren't always heard the way it was said or the way it was meant to be said. And I find some difficulty with some of the statements in the memoranda and in the complaints as far as the use of the property in as far as what I've said or other people have said. In 1983, the business was started on the property. Would there have been a problem with the business, the towing business per se, not salvage, not junk, not repairs, but towing business itself, would there have been a problem with that at that time? ~_R. HEDRICH: As far as the towing business goes, as an office only use and then parking your own wrecker at the site, that would have been a permitted use. ~R. HILL: Okay. MR. HEDRICH: The storage of any vehicles as a result of the towing business would have been an illegal use. ~R. HILL: If -- if I participated in police rotation at the time, would that have been allowed? MR. HEDRICH: No, sir. ~R. HILL: Would that have been allowed anywhere else in the county? ~{R. HEDRICH: Yes, sir. ~4R. HILL: Such as in residential zoning? I{R. HEDRICH: No, sir. MR. HILL: Okay. I'm going to -- Page 14 .6G1 November 14, 1997 ~4R. HEDRICH: Not for the storage of the vehicles. MR. HILL: I want to make a -- MR. HEDRICH: The use of a residence as an office to run your towing business from would have been allowed. ~. HILL: Okay. I want to make an observation that over the years, there have been -- there's been more liberty in the use of properties, reasonable use of properties. We were granted an occupational license by the county in -- somewhere in early 1983 to operate a towing business, which we did for many years in eastern Collier County without difficulty. There have been many other businesses similar to ours, in other places in the county that have operated in similar situations and maybe not quite to the level that we have, but we have the ground, we have the only place to operate in that area. The county seen that need at that time for towing service, within our geographical area. There are no other areas do~ there zoned that are available that I'm aware of, nor have they been, and the county allowed that operation for many years. They would not grant a salvage license or a repair license, which I'd asked for, and I think -- did I mention that in the hearing, in our original hearing, that I had asked for that? MR. HEDRICH: Yes, sir. MR. HILL: And I have nothing written on that. When you came out and observed the -- the violations, you took photographs. MR. HEDRICH: Yes, sir. MR. HILL: Okay. ~en you came out the second time and rock photographs again, were -- were the photographs the same? -MR. HEDRIC}{: No. There was a difference. MR. HILL: There was a difference in the -- in the land structure and the material there. MR. HEDRICH: Yes, sir. MR. HILL: Okay. I can allude a bit on that if -- if it's -- if this is the proper time. If not, I can wait. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: If you would, just hang onto that. MR. HILL: Okay. CHAI~ MERRILL: Have you got any more questions for ~r. Hedrich? MR. HILL: I -- I -- I don't think so. I think most of what I.:r. Hedrich has said is -- is -- is pretty clear as far as the way the county and the Code Enforcement observes it. I think they're accurate. I don't think they're completely accurate as far as the circumstances exactly. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Okay. You can hang onto that. We'll give you MR. HILL: Okay. CHAIR/VIAN MERRILL: -- chance to expand on that in a minute. Ma'am, do you have any questions? You have no questions. Any member of the board have any questions of Mr. Hedrich? (No response.) Page 15 November 14, 1997 CHAI~4AN MERRILL: Hearing none at this time, Code Enforcement, do you have any further witnesses? MR. HEDRICH: No, we don't. MS. SULLIVAN: No, sir. CHAIP/4AN MERRILL: That will close Code Enforcement's portion of the hearing. Now, sir, is your opportunity to say anything that you want to testify to. Understand that either Code Enforcement or members of the board may have questions for you. PLR. HILL: Not -- not a problem. I entertain any questions that you might have. Now, I can bounce around a little bit. CF~IRYJtN MERRILL: Bounce around a little bit. MR. HILL: Okay. I think first, I want to renote that we did not have very much time to prepare for this, so if it's not real clear, it's not by design. It's just because I have so many other things going on. On Page 1, I had marked that we were -- we were supposed to deliver the defense package by November the 7th, which we did, and that time frame didn't fall into there. On Page 2 -- CHAI~24 MERRILL: Mr. Hill, I want to ask you, do you have anything that you want to give us today even though it's beyond that date? ~. HILL: I -- I don't have any copies except for the initial information that I brought with me. I don't have any multiple copies to deliver. CHAIn.tAN MERRILL: Do you wish to have anything placed into the reccrrd by having it marked and introduced into evidence? MR. HILL: We can do that. CHAI~3d~ MERRILL: We can probably get some copies made, put the copies in evidence unless there's an objection. MR. HEDRICH: I have no objection. ~R. HILL: I would have some items here that probably will be reasonable to put into evidence then. One would be the Affidavit of Service. CHAI~.'.3~N MERRILL: Okay. We have that in -- in evidence, I believe, already. MR. HILL: Okay. The second item will be a cover sheet for the Florida Department of Motor Vehicles, which applies to Florida Law 713.78. That's the acquisition of title for vehicles that are towed in at law enforcement request or private property tow away. CHAI~ MERRILL: Could we have a copy of that made by somebody MS. CRUZ: Sure. C~\I~3~N MERRILL: -- on staff and we'll substitute the copy for his original. Mark that as Respondent's Exhibit Number 1. MR. HILL: I -- I will pass this along. That's not a problem. Also, I have a copy of last year's occupational license for the Page 16 November 14, 1997 towing business and I have a copy of a county license, mobile repair, and an Everglades City license for a William Maley who does mechanical repair, who I believe Mr. Hedrich had observed at our location on his last inspection doing mechanical repair. He's licensed by the county to move around and do repair in different areas. And I believe that that might be part of the concern that's surfaced here as far as repairs. CHAIN.LAN MERRILL: Okay. Anything else? MR. HILL: That's all I have, I think, that -- that needs to be entered. CHAI~J~N MERRILL: Could you hand those to the court reporter so she can mark those items, please? MS. HILL: Could I say something about the occupation license, please? CHAIRMAN MERRILL: You will be able to -- well, actually question Mr. Hill in just a second -- MS. HILL: Okay. CHAI~4Ad~ MERRILL: -- and make any objections that you might have to those documents. Right now, all we're going to do is just mark them. Okay? p~y don't we let -- Miss Weeks, is that your -- MS. HILL: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Ms. Weeks, why don't we let you take a look at those documents since you seem to maybe have an objection. MS. HILL: No. I just have a problem with the occupation license. I do not o~ Hill's Towing. I have not ov.~ed Hill's Towing since '91, and Mr. Hill will not take my name off the occupation license. ' CHAI~J~N MERRILL: Okay. We'll let you get into that in just a minute when you're up there. Do you want to take a look at those items or have you already seen them? MS. SULLiV~4: No. I'd like to see them. CHAIP~3%N MERRILL: Why don't you go ahead? MR. HEDRICH: Mr. Hill? MR. HILL: Yes, sir. MR. HEDRICH: The Everglades City license for Wi!!i~ Maley anJ Brothers. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: %,~at item is that listed as, please? MR. HEDRICH: This is Plaintiff's Exhibit 1. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: It should be Respondent's Exhibit 1, but that's okay. MR. HEDRICH: It's marked as such. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: I understand. MR. HEDRICH: Okay. The license for William Maley and Brothers is also connected with a Collier County Occupational License. On the Collier County Oca-upational Licenses, in the upper left-hand corner of these licenses is something marked location and zoned. This is put there for a reason and it's to indicate while -- even Page 17 November 14, 1997 though while this license was issued for mobile auto repair, the area to which it is limited is Everglades City, according to this. MR. HILL: There is a county occupational license as well as a city license there. M~. HEDRICH: That's exactly what I'm saying. CF~IP/4AN MERRILL: Mr. Hedrich, I'm going to cut you off here, because really what we're looking at is whether you have any objection to their introduction at this time, and we'll get into the content and what it means in just a second. ~&R. HEDRICH: Very well. No objection. CHAIRFJd~ ~4ERRILL: Okay. To the whole packet or just to that item? MS. SULLIV~{: It's okay. MR. HEDRICH: We have no objection to any of them. CHAIrmAN ~4ERRILL: Okay. So, they have no objection. You have no objection, ma'am; is that correct? MS. HILL: All except that I don't own Hill's Towing. CP~IRMAN ~4ERRILL: I understand. Okay. Does any member of the board have any objection to their introduction into evidence? (No response.) CP~IP34A2~ MERRILL: Hearing none, they're now introduced into evidence. Sir, you may continue with your testimony. FA. HILL: Thank you. Going to Page 2, it says, statement of violation and request for hearing. Under description of violations, it shows illegal use of outside storage of unlicensed vehicles and vehicle parts. Florida towing statutes 713.78 allows for the titling of vehicles when they've been towed by law enforcement, by private property tow away or whatever the other means. And what it does is it affords a towing business the ability to get clear title or certificated destruction for a vehicle to dispose of it to -- to offset their e>~enses to provide the service. In order to do that, we're required by law to store those for a certain amoun~ of time. After we store those vehicles, which may be abandoned, they may be stripped, they may be stolen, they may be wrecked, any -- any variation of -- of combinations of those, we can apply for a title. After we get title, then we have to dispose of them some way to generate an income, whether it's by selling the whole vehicle, which Florida law gives us the authority to sell one, 20, a hundred or a thousand vehicles every year as long as we obtain them through the towing and storage lien law. We're not affected by the Florida dealer's requirements in that respect. I'd looked into that several years ago, attempted to get a dealer's license, was advised because of zoning I could not do so, ~dn't need it. This was the state telling me this, that the Florida law, 713.78, covers that and allows me to sell those vehicles. Now, I interpret that a bit further, which may or may not be Page 18 November 14, 1997 correct, that if I have partial vehicles, I should also be able to dispose of them in some way to re -- recoup my expenses. I can understand where a retail sales might be a problem and did not actively try to sell retail, sold some wholesale, did have a parts hot line which I sold long distance to -- to other facilities that were selling and marketing parts, but I've never actively tried to sell retail these parts. But I believe I have a right to do that. And that's one of the contentions. The illegal accumulation of abandoned property and litter coincides with that. As you tow a vehicle in, you're required to hold it. Whether that vehicle is in good condition or poor condition does not matter the State of Florida, the Collier County Sheriff's Department or the owner. It belongs to them until we own it. We don't have a right to do anything with it. , Illegal salvage repairs and sales of vehicles and parts, we re not running a junk-yard, we're not running a salvage yard. Vehicles do accumulate. That's part of our business. We don't do repairs. We have done minor repairs ever the }-ears as far as emergency repairs; belts, hoses, normal breakdo~ type stuff where you as a part of the motoring public might be broken dov.~ and want your vehicle -- a hose put on it or a belt or a tire, whatever like that, so you can go on about your business instead of having it towed. We don't do that now. Any repairs, any emergency repairs, we try to farm out to someone else so we don't have a problem with that. Sales of vehicle, we've got a right to sell them. That's not eve9 a matter of question, I do not believe. Vehicle parts may be a matter of question. I still believe that I have a right to sell those parts at some level, maybe not retail, not advertising, but at some level I should be able to dispose of those parts to get income back. We did have an ad in the phone book last year. There's no ad in , ~o~~ to retail the phone book. There's no signs. There s no visual eft ~- products. There's no -- there's no real effort at all to sell any products at retail to anyone. Also, going along with the initial complaint of -- of vehicles, you would find upon inspection of our yard that some vehicles have current license plates and are owned by the people. You would find some vehicles have no owner of record and it's impossible to locate that owner, and you'd find other items that are illegible and unable to determine. You're going to find a very good mix there as far as whether they're owned or not. In December of '96, after many conversations with Code Enforcement and in an attempt to -- to comply with those requests zrom Code Enforcement that we get this worked out so we don't have a problem between us or with the county, I had a company come in from Fort Lauderdale and remove approximately 200 to 250 of the vehicles in question. They were crushed, they were hauled out and vehicles have Page 19 November i4, 1997 accumulated again over a period of time, which is natural for our business and the area that we're in because it's so large. We get a lot of abandoned vehicles from law enforcement. We are currently on the -- on the calendar to have vehicles removed again in December. The exact date is not set but probably somewhere between the 10th and Christmas, in that area. This has already been planned in advance prior to this -- this hearing. So, we actively attempt to keep everything cleaned up and clear, but it accumulates, and the county in its -- by nature wants to keep every yard cleaned up, all of the vehicles out of the yards that are unlicensed, and somebody's got to pick them up. If it's me or not me, somebody's got to remove them because the county is going to -- going to expect those vehicles to be moved and disposed of. I don't do very much of that work, but I'm sure that a few of the cars that come across my dirt are cars that fit within that cJiteria. I'd again contend with the -- with the question of litter. There may be a lot of items on the property that -- that need to be cleaned up and will be cleaned up, but I don't think would fit within the -- the -- within the real guidelines of what the litter ordinance would find to do or is supposed to do. We're actively working in the area and I don't think it applies. There was items on Page 15 and 16 that have been underlined. They had to do with -- I think they had to do with roadside sales, r don't think that is applicable to what we're doing. I don't think we -- on Page 17, I don't think we fall within the area that -- that we're -- we're storing abandoned litter or -- or using our site for a du3r, p. We -- we just recently had an enviro~enta! audit done at the request of the federal goverp~ent by Law Engineering that was completed just a few months ago. They -- they instituted a Level 2 environmental audit on the property. The property was found to be clear and clean, and we've been running this business since 1983. There are very few businesses that operate any t}~e of automotive-related business that could -- that could lay claim to tha~, least of all someone ~uznin. a salvace or a junkyard On Page 24, this will be a memorand'~n from Linda Sullivan to ~u i a salvage yard and reDai~ and Vince Cautero. It says we're . 'nn ng - ~ sales operation. That's incorrect. It also says, he had a similar operation some time ago and was aware of the requirements. He has since moved to Cope!and and simply disregarded the requirements since setting up business there. Evidently, that is a misunderstanding between us or poor information because I've never had a salvage operation or a wrecker business in any other location. The only business that I've ever had related to that area is at the current location, and I don't know where that came from or why it's there, but there's some misunderstandings within -- within this memorandum. Also, if you go down, it says, this complaint originated from Florida Highway Patrol. He does some work for the FHP and they would Page 20 November 14, 1997 like to remove him from their list per violation of county codes. I interpret that to say that the Florida High -- and this is my interpretation of what it appears to be -- that the Florida Highway Patrol has contacted the county and advised them that they want me removed from their list, that they know that I'm in violation. They want me removed. Now, that's what it looks like to me on the surface. I have talked to the Highway Patrol in Naples and in Fort Myers and questioned this statement. They have told me by no means are they actively engaging to have me removed from the rotation list. They did not say that. That is not their intention, that the complaint did originate with the Florida Highway Patrol in Naples. For what reason I do not know. But they are not actively engaged in an attempt to remove me. So, this statement would -- would tend to give you a poor look at me as far as law enforcement views me. On Page 28 -- on Page 28, it says we obtained our license in late '83 to '84. I think it would be more accurate to say it was early 'B3, which probably won't make any difference at all. It says, in order to run a salvage yard or junkyard for vehicles, a junk dealer's license was and is required -- I agree with that -- to sell automobile parts, new and used. A retail license is required under the section to repair automobiles. I agree. The state -- the state license, I understand all that and I agree with that, but I also do stipulate that we have -- we have a -- a right issued us in the State of Florida, because of the business that we do, to sell any vehicle that we obtain title or certificate of destruction for, either at wholesale or retail, and I believe that that would also cover any parts that come from that. As long as I don't actively retail, I don't believe that I would be in violation of the intent or -- or the -- the direction of any county ordinances. And also, over the years, I have made numerous requests with the county in licensing at different times for different occupational licenses, and in those requests, which I have no validation for, they have told me that it wasn't a problem as far as selling parts, operating the towing business, doing minor emergency repairs, but I never got anything in writing from them and they always refused to do that. But -- but the question was always asked and the answer was the same. It's not a problem. It's covered under your wrecker license. We can't give you one because zoning won't allow you to -- allow us to give you that license. MR. DeVITO: What zoning? MR. HILL: The zoning as far as agricultural zoning on the property. The property has always been zoned agricultural. When we applied for the wreck -- for the license -- MR. DeVITO: But they refused to give you the license because of that? MR. HILL: They refused to give us a license for salvage yard, junkyard, repair shop or anything like that because it's zoned Page 21 November 14, 1997 agricultural. And I understand that. I don't have a problem with that. But -- but we were issued the license to operate the wrecker business and no one in -- in -- that knows anything about automobile service or tow trucks can by the furthest stretch of the imagination bel±eve that you can run a towing business without storing cars on your property. It just can't be. ~IR. DeVITO: But it must be done legal. MR. HILL: Sir? MR. DeVITO: It must be done legally. MR. HILL: Yes, sir. I'm -- I'm in the belief that we've been doing it legally since 1983, and since this question has come up, you know, this is -- this is the first that I've been told that I'm wrong in what I'm doing. And I believe that the county has giving us their blessing to operate this business for this many years, that we provide an important service to eastern Collier County, to law enforcement and the motoring public, that it's -- it can be anywhere from 40 to 80 miles from Naples to get service in our area. So, we provide a service that will disappear if we're gone, that it won't be there any longer, and that may not be important as far as the letter of the law, but I think that the county in the past took that into consideration, allowed us to operate a business, gave us their blessing. And I would -- I would look for you-all to -- to consider that and allow us to go ahead and continue to work and make a living where we're at. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: Thank you, Mr. Hill. Mr. Hedrich or anyone from Code Enforcement, do you have que§tions of Mr. Hill? MS. SULLIVAN: No, sir. I don't have any questions. MR. HEDRICH: I have a couple. Mr. Hill, you've said that you had never run another business. HR. HILL: I said that -- MR. HEDRICH: -- besides the one out there? HR. HILL: I said that I've never run an automotive related business prior to coming to Copeland. I did have another repair shop in '92-'93, somewhere in that area, in Naples for approximately a year, but I never ran a business prior to coming to Cope!and to operate the towing business. HR. HEDRICH: Okay. But you did say at no other time did you have any other type of automotive repair, wrecker or any other service MR. HILL: I said -- MR. HEDRICH: -- of that type? HR. HILL: If -- if it wasn't clear, that was one of the lacks of cLar~X that I was talking about earlier, that if my words weren't acc=hate, what they were meant to be was that I had never run an auton~otive related business or a wrecker prior to coming to Copeland and opening that business in Copeland in 1983. PIR. HEDRICH: Okay. So, in 1991, the three licenses that were Page 22 November 14, 1997 issued to you; one for automotive repair, one for wrecker service and one for retail sales, those three licenses were given to you for businesses in the industrial park area off of Pine Ridge Road; is that correct? MR. HILL: Yes, sir. A and T Services. MR. HEDRiCH: Right. And you did those services from the industrial park. MR. HILL: Yes, sir. That was in '91, not before '83. MR. HEDRICH: Okay. So -- right, but you were aware that these types of licenses were needed for the services that you wanted to perform. M/R. HILL: I was aware that the industrial zoning allowed for those licenses and that I had requested those licenses from county -- county employees in the past for the property at Deep Lake and had been refused those licenses on the grounds of zoning. MR. HEDRICH: Okay. And one other thing. The license you currently hold for your location at 20202 Highway 29, your license number is 840173; correct? ~R. HILL: I'm not sure. I'd have to check the exhibits to see. MR. HEDRICH: Okay. We have a copy of the license here in front of us, License Nu~-uber 840173. The eight four indicates the year to which the license was issued, just to clarify that point. MR. HILL: Okay. M~R. HEDRICH: We would not have issued an '84 numbered license if it wasn't given after September 30th of 1983. So, it. was the later part of that year just to clarify that. MR. HILL: Okay. I'll stand corrected on that. MR. HEDRICH: Okay. That's all. -MS. P~WSON: I have one question, Mr. Hill. The statute that you were referring to, is that one of your exhibits, the Florida towing statute? MR. HILL: Yes, ma'am. I've got a face copy of Florida Statute 713.78, which relates to applying for titles and proper processing, according to Florida law, of vehicles. MS. RAWSOlq: If I could -- if the court reporter would hand me that statute, I'd appreciate it. CHAIRFL~N ME,~RILL: Folks, I'm going to divert just a second to -- it's 9:35. I have some time constraints. I have to go and appear before Judge B!ackwell in about ten minutes. I do not want to hold this hearing up for my absence. I think we have a quorum if I do leave. We have more than four members present, so I do have to depart at this point in time. I'll be back as soon as I can. Hopefully, it will be short, but I do have to go. I'm going to have to pass the gavel on to someone else. Mr. Bradeen is not present. He is the vice-chairman. I'm asking for some suggestions, Ms. Rawson, as to how we proceed without the vice-chairman as to who will conduct the meeting. MS. RAWSON: We can ask for a volunteer. CHAIRMA/~ MERRILL: Good. Do we have anyone to volunteer to conduct the remaining portion of the meeting in my absence? Don't Page 23 November 14, 1997 everybody step forward at once. MS. SAUNDERS: I will volunteer if Miss Rawson promises to tell me what I'm supposed to do -- MS. RAWSON: I'll help you -- MS. SAUNDERS: -- to keep it going. MS. RAWSON: -- Miss Saunders. Thank you. MS. SAUNDERS: Thank you. Okay. CHAIRMA/~ MERRILL: Mr. Hill, Miss Weeks, I do apologize. This is un -- it was foreseeable, I suspect, but there's nothing that I can do and I do have to depart. I will be back as soon as I can. Hopefully, you'll still be here. I'd like to participate in this discussion -- this decision, but I have to go. MR. HILL: Understood. CHAI~4AN MERRILL: Okay. And I will be back as soon as ! can. Your meeting. MS. SAUNDERS: Thank you. Code Enforcement had no further questions? MS. SULLIVAN: No further questions. MS. SAUNDERS: I had one and then I think maybe some of the other board. Oh, Miss Weeks, do you want to ask any questions that you might have? MS. HILL: No. I don't have any questions. I just want to ask him a question. It has nothing -- MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. No questions for Mr. Hill. Okay. Mr. Hill, I have one question. Is it -- MS. RAWSON: Just -- just a minute. For the record, Miss Weeks, is your question about the hearing today? MS. HILL: Ail I want to know, because he's the State's Attorney, how can he run -- MS. RAWSON: He's not a State's Attorney -- MS. HILL: Oh, I'm sorry. MS. RAWSON: -- any longer. MS. HILL: Okay. Well, he's an attorney. How can Mr. Hill run a towing company with an occupation license? It's not true. I do not o%~ that company. CHAIRMAN MERRILL: I'll pass on that question. MS. RAWSON: Okay. He's going -- MS. HILL: I'll ask the board. MS. RAWSON: Okay. He's going to pass on that question and he's -- he is an attorney. And that's a question that you can ask ~o the board. MS. HILL: Okay. I'll ask the board. How can Mr. Hill operate Hill's Towing in '91 when I sold it and I had to get Tal!ahassee -- because we were a corporation -- I wrote Tallahassee and got myself o~ o~ %he records, and Mr. Hill has not yet took me off of the occupational license here. I don't o~ Hill's Towing. MS. TA%~OR: Who owns the property? MS. HILL: I do. I own the property. I lease it to Mr. Hill. Page 24 November 14, 1997 He had a five-year lease. I have tried to evict him, but because he is saying something is wrong with the -- with the title, he has a pending case. I am not even allowed to go on the property until the eviction notice is finished. I have not been on that property for three years. He leases it. His lease was up in '97 of April and it is in court. So, I had no knowledge of this or anything like that, but all I leased it for was the towing company. MS. RAWSON: There's a quitclaim deed in your packet where Hill quitclaimed it to Ms. Weeks, I presume, subsequent to a divorce? MS. HILL: No. He owed me money. He gave it to me for that money. There was only one witness. We got that straightened in court. The land is legally titled to me. MR. HILL: Just to the point of interest for everyone, we're divorced, have been divorced for some time. It was less than amicably. There is a court process going on at this time to determine who owns the property. That's a matter of question and I don't think it's even germane to what we're doing here. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. Mr. Hill, let me ask you a question. And is it your interpretation of your license as a -- you have a wrecker service operations license for a towing license from Collier County. Is it your interpretation of that license that that gives you -- part of the license allows you to store and -- to store the -- let me put it that way -- to store vehicles as part of -- automatically as part of the towing license? MR. HILL: My -- my understanding of the license, from the time that I got the license up until currently, that any use that I needed to u-se that property for to conduct the wrecker business, be it storing vehicles, storing wreckers, conducting investigations on the property for access with law enforcement or whatever it might be, would be allowable and proper use. MS. SAUNDERS: As part of the definition in effect of what a wrecker license allows you. MR. HILL: That -- that is my belief and I believe that is accurate. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. And then one other question just to go back to what Miss Weeks was saying, when did you most recently have to renew the wrecker license? MR. HILL: I think the license is -- MS. SAUNDERS: Yearly? MR. HILL: I'd ask Code Enforcement. Is the license current or is it running out? Is it '96 or seven or seven or eight? MR. HEDRICH: Yes. The license expires September 30th of each year. MR. HILL: Now, the county, I believe, had failed to send a new license to me, or it had been lost in the mail, or for whatever reason I did not get that. I just realized that and when -- I intend to go down and get that license renewed today. MR. HEDRICH: Just for the record, even though Mr. Hill has not Page 25 November 14, 1997 renewed his license and it is now approximately 60 days past due, they do allow for these time periods before renewal. MS. SAUNDERS: And is there any reason to believe that ~r. Hill would not get a renewal of his wrecker license if it wasn't -- if it was just in his name alone rather than the two people? MR. HEDRICH: No. There's no reason to believe he would not. MS. SAUNDERS: So, that isn't -- I mean, that's an -- a poin~ but not a factor in this. MR. HEDRICH: Right. MS. SAUNDERS: It seems to me what we're down to is the definition of what a wrecker license implies you can do with the property. MR. HEDRICH: If I may? MS. SAUNDERS: Yes. MP,. HEDRICH: Again, Mr. Hill's license was issued to hit,: after September 30th of '83. The occupational licensing ordinance i cited him under was the '81, 1981, occupational license ordinance, which is still in effect to this date. And that ordinance clearly states that if you do contain, store and place cars on your property for the purpose of salvage, that a separate license is required under that ordinance. That was enacted at that time. There's a clear definition between wrecker service and salvage. MS. SAUNDERS: So, other operation -- other wrecker licenses tha% are in existence in Collier County now either have -- the property is zoned both for the wrecker license and the salvage or they would have a separate location for the salvage part of it? MR. HEDRICH: Correct. MS. SULLIVAN: I think it -- it may clarify for you, the wrecker occupational license for a wrecker service means that you can have a tow t~uck and that you can operate your business out of your home, but you must take that tow truck and pick things up and tow them off. You don't bring them home. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. MS. SULLIVAN: You don't bring home what you tow. You can bring your tow truck. ~3. SAUNDERS: I understand. Any other questions from -- MS. TAYLOR: I have a question. You say you lease this property to him? MS. HILL: Yes, ma'am, I do. MS. TAYLOR: Is -- is the payment current? MS. HILL: No, it is not. He has not paid anything since October. That is why we put an eviction, but before we could serve the eviction, he put the pending on the land. MS. TAYLOR: Mr. Hill is a -- is a talker, a real talker. It seems to me that he's -- he's doing everything illegal on property that he doesn't even own. MR. HILL: Ma'am, that's a matter o~ contention, and for you to determine that I don't own that property would be -- would be improper Page 26 November 14, 1997 at this time. It's in the court system and you don't have authority to make that determination. MS. TAYLOR: That's the way it appears, Mr. Hill. M!q. HILL: Yes, ma'am. I understand that you may be saying that it appears that way, but until the Court decides who owns the property, neither one of us own the property. MS. TAYLOR: I'm just going by what Mrs. Hill said, that it was deeded. It's in her name, so -- MS. HILL: Yes, it is deeded in my name. I do have a lease agreement. I don't have it with me now. My attorney has it. And, like I said, he put a pending case. I do not own the towing company, but he still has me as owner of the towing company. That's illegal, too. MR. HILL: If it might help, we are currently scheduled to go to court in Collier County the week of November the 25th, date unknown, hopefully -- hopefully, to resolve this question as far as who o~s the property. MS. SAUNDERS: Are there any more questions for Mr. Hill at this time? MR. OXLEY: You were authorized your license in 1983 to use that property for your towing service? MR. HILL: Whenever we -- whenever we got the initial license, we were given authority to operate a towing business there in eastern Collier County and have done so since that time. MR. OXLEY: On that property? M~R. HILL: Yes, sir. That's correct. MR. OXLEY: And my next question would be, why did it take 13 years to say what you're doing is illegal? -MR. HEDRICH: I couldn't answer that, sir. MR. DeVITO: I believe that was phrased wrong. He got a license as -- you know, to pick up vehicles, but nobody gave him a license to put the vehicles on that property. MR. AD~S: They denied him a license to operate the salvage. ~R. DeVITO: He assumed that. He's assuming it, but he has no license to put those vehicles on that property. ~R. HILL: If it will help you-all any at all, I haven't stored an excess amount of vehicles on that property for the first large number of years. In 19 -- I believe it was '83, if I'm not incorrect, the State of Florida decided that they were going to establish towing rights for a nonconsent towing and, of course, everyone knows that state government can better take care of us than we can take care of ourself as well as the federal government. And they established rates which were about 40 percent below what we charge and what it takes to operate a business. And we were forced to adapt in order to -- to continue to make a living and stay in business. That meant accumulating more vehicles and generating income from those vehicles rather than giving them away, which is what we did in the past. We gave them away without income. Ail we did is we Page 27 [ [ [[[n,~ [[ [[ I Il [ ] ............ [ 6G1 ", November 14, 1997 retained the vehicles instead of hauling them away, after we brought them in, generally at law enforcement authority, and then we had an outside supplier come in and pick those vehicles up, crush them, haul them away to generate additional income. I see -- I see -- although it might may appear like a junkyards or a salvage yard, I'm in the normal course of a towing business in a -- in a very, very rural area that has no junkyards and no salvage Yards and no large operations that can take care of these vehicles, nor any properly zoned property. There was no properly zoned property at the time that I got into business. I think that is one of the reasons that the county give us authority to operate that business, knowing that we would store vehicles there for law enforcement purposes as well as for prostate individuals. P[R. DeVITO: I happen to disagree. I feel that the people that did give you the license, gave you the license, again, assuming that you did have the property. I mean, I wouldn't go into a business, a salvage business, unless I had the property to put those vehicles on. ~R. HILL: I'm -- I'm referring to -- MR. DeVITO: Did you intend to just drop them off all over the city? MR. HILL: I'm afraid I didn't make that clear. %'~en we initially started the business, we did not store large numbers of vehicles on this property. MR. DeVITO: But you're doing it now. MR. HILL: We have allowed vehicles to accumulate because of a lack of income from other areas. We have picked these vehicles up. through Florida Statutes, through our normal course of business in the towfng and I believe that we have authority to sell those vehicles ~o generate enough money to offset our e>~enses. It would be kind of like me going out and doing a job for you an~ then you saying, well, I'm not going to pay you. And if you compare o&& that to me towing your car in ~~ the side of the road which I m~c%" do sometime for you or someone else, and then you decide you don't want your car because it's broken or it was in a wreck or whatever, i have no recourse. I can't get any money from you to pay for tha~ car. So, now I have to figure out how do I get paid, how do I pay my son, how do I pay myself, how do I pay insurance, trucks payments, et cetera. And the only way is to generate income from that vehicle one way or another; sell it, sell parts, crush it for salvage, do something to generate a cash flow to allow the business to continue to provide service for the public and law enforcement. MR. DeVITO: At a proper location. MR. HILL: I -- I would really like to know where that location might be in our area. The federal government has taken over a great deal of the land. There are -- MR. DeVITO: Are you telling -- are you telling me that you're '~h~ only junkyard in -- is he the only junkyard in Collier County? MR. HILL: Collier County? We're not talking about Collier Page 28 November 14, 1997 County, sir. We're talking about eastern Collier County. MR. DeVITO: Collier County. MR. HILL: About 35 miles from here. MR. DeVITO: Do we have other businesses that do the same? MR. HEDRICH: I cannot verify one way or the other. MR. HILL: You do here in Naples. I can verify that, but not -- but not in our area. There's one grandfathered in business were processing vehicles. Other than that, there are none currently that I'm aware of in our area. There are also no other towing companies within our area, being eastern Collier County-Everglades area, and I know of no property that they could legally run on if they were there. MR. HEDRICH: One question. The -- the one business you're referring to, is that also on State Road 29? MR. HILL: Yes, sir, it is. MR. HEDRICH: Is that Alley Towing, Alligator Towing or -- is that Alley Towing? I'm not -- I can't recall. MR. HILL: That's Alley Auto Parts. Have you been there? MR HEDRICH: I've driven by it before. It's just a -- MR HILL: You haven't been in? MR HEDRICH: It's just a few miles up from your place there? MR HILL: You haven't been inside? MR HEDRICH: No. MR HILL: Oh, you've missed a real treat. MR ADAMS: I have a question of Code Enforcement. The special concern overlay. MR. HEDRICH: Yes. MR. ADAMS: ~at is the concern? I mean, is it wildlife? is i_ you know, and when was that overlay established? MR. HEDRICH: The area of critical state concern with special treatment overlay is put on designated properties throughout the Everglades because of wildlife and water concerns. MR. ADAMS: Do you know when that overlay was -- was that prior to '84 or was it just zoned agricultural back then? MR. HEDRICH: I cannot tell by the information on the map. MR. AD~4S: That's the main concern here, I think, is the, you know, the property. I think it's legally being used as a towing service but as far as storing vehicles on the property, I think it's an illegal use. MR. HEDRICH: Even -- even without the -- the overlay on it, agricultural property was not given a designation at the time the business was started for the storage of vehicles and salvage yards and so forth. MR. ADAMS: And it's not even -- a rezone wouldn't even be possible. MR. HEDRICH: No, sir. MR. ADAMS: Rezoning for salvage placements or -- MR. HEDRICH: No. MS. SAUNDERS: Mr. Hedrich, are there areas in eastern Collier County that are properly zoned for this storing and salvage portion of Page 29 November 14, 1997 this kind of business that you know of? MR. HEDRICH: None that I know of. Most of the property -- just about all of the property out this way now, it's either zcned conservation, agricultural or it has a special treatment overlay. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. MR. HILL: I might add one other thought, and I don't know if it was a -- a factor in allowing the -- the initial license to be issued, but we are in a location that's directly across from the Copeland Road Prison on State Road 29, which is a state facility. It's a minim~ security facility but it's still a correctional facility. That could have been part of the -- part of the consideration given that there would not be any residences in the area, any development, and that it would not be a bother for anyone. Als.n, it's property, old property of record. This is not filled property. This property initially belonged to the Collier family and has been there for -- as long as anybody can remember. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. Any other questions of Mr. Hill? (No response.) MS. SAUNDERS: Miss Weeks, I think it's your turn, if you'd like to -- MS. HILL: I have no questions. I said what I meant and I -- i mean, I just don't understand why he can operate a license when it's illegal because I don't own Hill's Towing, and I have asked him -- I have wrote him letters from the time he leased the property to me to please keep the property clean. He has copies. I've certified those letters. My attorney has those copies and he ignored those also. MS. SAUNDERS: Miss Weeks, at one point you did o~ the towing bus£ness as well. Was the land being used at that time -- MS. HILL: Yes, ma'am. MS. SAUNDERS: -- as a storage? MS. HILL: We bought, when we moved out there, we got the towing license in '83. We got a divorce in nine -- '90 --'91. That's when he bought my half out and I have since '91 asked him to take me off of the occupational license. Like I said, two years later, my attorney and I wrote to Tallahassee and got me disregistered off of the incorporation license, but he won't take my name off of the corporation -- off of the occupation 1;cense. I don't own it. MS. SAI/NDERS: No, we can't help you with that I don't believe. MS. HILL: I understand, but this is another illegal thing that he is doing. He has an occupational license stating that we both o%~ the company and we don't. He owns it a hundred percent. MS. SAUNDERS: Did the business change substantially in '90 or '917 I mean, was there substantially more vehicles being stored on the property? Were they kept for a longer period; any change that you noticed in the -- MS. HILL: I haven't noticed any because, like I said, '91, '92 -- '93 is the last time I'd been on the property, was allowed on the property, and it looked like a junkyard then. Page 30 IIII November 14, 1997 MS. SAUNDERS: Thank you. Any other questions? MR. OXLEY: Just the same observation, to allow that property to be used for 13 years and all of a sudden say, hey, it's illegal, that don't make sense to me. MR. HEDRICH: Well, I assure you if we had been made aware of it or if I had been made aware of it earlier, I would have acted upon it as such. MR. OXLEY: Yeah, but it's been there. It's been years that's it's been there. It's been used. Everybody knows it. The Highway Patrol knows it. Why would it be allowed to be used if it was illegal? MR. HEDRICH: Well, as far as the Highway Patrol was concerned, if he had a license for towing, which is what his business relationship is with the Florida Highway Patrol, then he was al. lowed to do and conduct his business. They were not aware of other zoning violations or other problems that might be occurring out there until they made the report to us. MiR. OXLEY: But the Highway Patrol had been on that property? MR. HEDRICH: I can't say that they had. MR. HILL: The Highway Patrol had been on the property a number of times, at least once to inspect the records each year and, generally speaking, having law enforcement, either Highway Patrol, the Sheriff's Department, probably as many as four to six times a week. sometimes longer, but many times more. MR. OXLEY: Just doesn°t sound logical, I'm sorry. MS. TAYLOR: Well, it's just as plain as the nose on your face. The man is doing something illegal on -- now, he's going to have a little spell -- on property that he doesn't own and it's just that simple. MS. OXLEY: But he's been allowed to do it for 13 years. MS. TAYLOR: That is not the point. MF.. OXLEY: That is the point -- MS. TAYLOR: No, it isn't. MR. OXLEY: -- to me. I'm sorry. MS. TAYLOR: No, it isn't -- MR. OXLEY: For 13 years -- MS. TAYLOR: -- Mr. Oxley. MR. OXLEY: -- we've allowed him to use that property for that and now we're saying you cannot use that property for that, that does not make sense. MR. DeVITO: So, the Love Canal goes on? Is that what you're saying? MR. OXLEY: I think we should allow the gentleman -- MR. DeVITO: If we find something -- MR. OXLEY: -- time to resolve the problem. MR. DeVITO: -- wrong, we have to correct it, right? That's why we're here. MR. OXLEY: He should be allowed time -- MS. TAYLOR: That's right. Page 31 November 14, 1997 MR. OXLEY: -- to resolve the problem, which I intend -- I understand they intend to do. They're going to court, et cetera, et cetera. They should be allowed time. MS. RAWSON: If you aren't going to ask any more questions of ~.[r. Hill and Miss Weeks, we can close the public portion of the meeting and you -- then the board can deliberate and see if you have any motions. Is that where we are? MS SAUNDERS: I believe so. MS RAWSON: Well, then we can close the public portion of the meeting MS SULLIVAN: Miss Rawson? MS RAWSON: Yes. MS SULLIVAN: Can I make a -- MS RAWSON: Yes. MS SULLIVAN: Can I make a comment? MS RAWSON: Please. MS SULLIVAN: I'd just like to clarify staff's position on this. I think everybody is mostly clear, but our position is we have no problem with what Mr. Hill is doing. It is simply a zoning matter. It is where he is doing it. And I understand that the state statute gives him a right to use -- do what he does with storage and stuff, but it -- you know, the county can be more restrictive and we just have a problem with where he's doing it and not what he's doing. MS. RAWSON: I might add, if it Clarifies anything, the statute that he relies on, 713.78, simply provides for the sale of motor vehicles for unpaid towing and storage charges. - MR. HILL: It also requires us to hold those vehicles for a specified amount of time -- MS. RAWSON: Thirty-five days -- MR. HILL: -- notify -- MS. RAWSON: -- but it doesn't say where. MR. HILL: -- notify owner, lien holder, et cetera, and we're required to keep, well, personal possession at one location or another. It could be in another location, but I don't think there are any other locations available in that area that would be secure or affordable in order to do that. MS. SAUNDERS: Thank you very much. Let me close the public portion of this hearing in that case and open it to discussion by the members of the panel commission. MS. TAYLOR: What was the -- what does staff recommend? MS. SULLIVAN: Staff recommends that there be a date which Mr. Hill must remove the storage on the property or fines would be imposed at a hundred dollars a day. MS. SAUNDERS: If I may say so, that sound -- I understand the conflict to some extent between the parties, but I think our issue rea/ty is that if we're to -- if we are required to enforce the law, the law says -- the zoning laws say that you cannot do this kind of -- you cannot provide for the storage of this location. Page 32 November 14, 1997 Yes, it probably should have been caught sooner than 13 years. It may have changed in the last few years, but regardless of that, I do think the man is running a business and has a right to run a business, and it's probably needed out there, but we're net in a position to change, in my opinion, the zoning laws. So, I feel the only right thing that Code Enforcement can do is to say, yes, this is in violation of the zoning laws. The wrecking license is fine and it holds but it must be -- there must be a second location for the business or a proper location in which to store, maintain and sell vehicles. They cannot -- the location at the Hill property at this point is appropriate only for operating the wrecker service and nothing further. So, I agree with the staff recommendations that we set a time limit. And I would hope we don't base that time limit on when the individuals involved are going to court on their personal situation, because that doesn't affect it in my mind at all. b~R. DeVITO: How many vehicles right now do you have on the property? ~R. HILL: I would estimate probably 200 to 250, could be slightly more but would not be any less. MR. AD~4S: What would you consider a reasonable time period if you had to remove the vehicles from the property? MR. HILL: We currently have a time frame set up in order to bring a salvage processing company in to remove the bulk of the vehicles. I think that in itself is not going to remedy my problem. Pretty much the position that it sounds like that I'm in is that I'm out of business, as it currently sounds. I think it's improper for Collier County to put me out of business. I -- I can see where you might have a problem with the storage of the excess vehicles. We have kept the property cleaned and had an environmental audit just recently that shows that the property is clean, that we have not d~maged that property in any way, and that was done by Law Engineering. What I would look for from the county is the -- the authority, the blessing, the license in writing or whatever it takes to allows us to operate our towing business. We don't have any desire to run a junkyard, and I would be happy to remove the majority of the vehicles. I still think that I enjoy certain rights under state law to sell certain vehicles or partial vehicles at retail or wholesale, but -- but I ~m prepared to remove the bulk of the vehicles and put the property in a -- in a more acceptable atmosphere for the county so the county would be comfortable in what the operation is doing and where it's going. And I -- I've got to reiterate, I think it would be wrong for you-all to put me out of business because if you tell me I cannot store vehicles on my property, then I'm out of business. I cannot do law enforcement towing. And in the past, Florida Highway Patrol, Collier County Sheriff's Department required an occupational license. It was their belief that Page 33 November 14, 1997 this occupational license gave us the right to tow and store vehicles per county regulations, because part of their requirements in order to be on a rotation system is that we have to be able to store vehiz!es securely, we have to be able to maintain inside storage securely for -- for personal reasons as well as investigation. And if I was in error in what I'm doing, then thusly, Collier County and the Florida Highway Patrol and other goverr~enta! agencies are also in error in what they believe is proper and correct. MR. DeVITO: Mrs. Rawson, is it possible that Mr. Hill can get a special dispensation for this property here? MS. RAWSON: I don't know the answer to that question, but I can tell you that this board doesn't have the authority to give it to him. MR. DeVITO: I P~ow we don't but -- MS. RAWSON: Right. Your powers are -- are limited to looking at the ordinance or code or statute, deciding if there's a violation and assuring that compliance takes place. What he's asking you to do is to give him the authority to continue to do what he's doing, grandfather him, if you will, give him a license. There are other methods for him to apply for, you know, a variance, but this is not the proper forum. Now, whether or not that can happen or not, I -- we can ask Miss Sullivan who he would apply to, but it's not this board. MR. DeVITO: Can he do it, Mrs. Sullivan? MR. HEDRICH: I can -- I could answer -- MS. SULLIVan: Go ahead. MR. HEDRICH: -- for that. During the course of the investigation, I made numerous inquiries and spent hours meeting with members of the Planning Department, Building Department to see if there was any way we could get this to be allowed out there on the property. During the course of my inquiries, I was not able to get any positive answers or results as to how Mr. Hill would be able to go about making this legal out there. MS. RAWSON: My guess it would be a request for a zon~nc variance, but that ~oulcln't be before this board. MS. SULLIVAN: That's correct. MR. DeVITO: Have you tried to get a zoning variance? MR. HILL: Nc, sir, I have not. And -- and the information i have received in the conversations, you know, with the county, i've been advised that it's not going to happen especially given the nature of -- of the area where we're at and the fact that the federal government is taking over a great deal of the land in the area and has done so for many years and continues to expand, that it's not likely that I will get any support to -- to make a variance on a property. MR. ADAMS: Mr. Hill, I just want you to understand -- I guess our responsibility as the Code Enforcement Board is to listen to the evidence and find whether or not you are indeed in violation. You know what I'm saying? There are certain things that are beyond our Page 34 ......... ,,, Im IIIIII II IIIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIIII I II I ........... I Il I November 14, 1997 control, and what we're being asked to do today is determine whether or not you're in violation of what the Code Enforcement has found. MR. HILL: Is violation in its strictest sense violation of the letter of the law, the spirit of the law or the intent of the law? MS. P~WSON: I guess I should answer that. MS. SAUNDERS: Yes. l{R. RAWSON: Violation means that this board is charged with reading the ordinance provided to you in the packet, listening to %he evidence that's presented to you at this hearing today, ascertaining whether or not a violation of that ordinance exists. If you find that it does, then your charge is to assure compliance. And usually what you do is you give them so many days to come into compliance or there is a fine thereafter. And, so, you are charged with reading the statute or the ordinance as written ~n determining whether or not a violation exists. MS. TAYLOR: I would like to make a motion that we follow staff's recommendation. MS. SADNDERS: ~ich is to find this in violation and -- MS. SULLiVan: We -- the -- the recor,mendation that I made earlier did not have a compliance date on it. MS. TAYLOR: With that added. MS. SULLIVan: With the compliance date, yes, ma'am. ~.~. DeVITO: I guess we ought to take into consideration the amount of vehicles that must be moved. MR. LOC~qART: I have a question for Mr. Hill. You mentioned you had an environmental audit done? MR. HILL: Yes, sir. MR. LOCKHART: ?~at prompted you to do that? - ~R. HILL: The federal governmen~ is actively engaged in attempting to purchase the property from my ex-wife. I am not in agreement with ~hat and contend tha~ she does not o~ the property; however, to -- MR. LOCKHART: So, you -- MR. HILL: -- to be reasonable and fair, I've allowed the environmental audit to continue to assure that the property is clean and clear, that we are not in violation and, actually, ~o set aside any further goverr~ent intrusion into this business. ~R. LOC~RT: So, you're paying for the audit? MR. HILL: No, the federal goverr~ent paid for the enviror_~enta! audit to Law Engineering. It is complete. And the property was deemed to be clean and clear of any problems. MR. LOCKHART: You don't have any notice of violation or any action from the Department of Environmental Protection on the property? HR. HILL: No, sir. Not at all. MR. LOCKHART: Okay. .~S. HILL: Could I add something? I had to go to court to get a court order to have ~he engineerings to go on, so I'm paying for it. MR. LOCKHART: But the audit is done for a potential sale of the Page 35 16Gl "' November 14, 1997 property or purchase of the property? MS. HILL: It is because I was going to sell the property to the government, and one of the agents went out and seen oil spill on the ground and he wanted it. Mr. Hill agreed on it but then he would not let them on there, so therefore, I had to go to court to get a court order to let them get on the property to do this. MR. LOCKHART: And the audit is complete? MS. HILL: As far as I know, it is. I don't know if they go back and recheck after the court date or what. MS. SAUNDERS: Mrs. Rawson, I think -- MR. HILL: Per -- per a response from Law Engineering, their final response gave indications of -- of all -- all the criteria that they inspect on property for -- for any pollutants and -- and their recommendation was that the property was clear and they seen no further reason to -- to pursue any other tests on the property at this time. MR. LOCKHART: That's the same as far as the Army Corps of Engineers? MR. HILL: I -- I think that you'll find that a Level 2 audit is very stringent and it's -- it would have been more than adequate to put us out of business had it -- had it not been a favorable result. MS. SAUNDERS: I do believe we have a motion on the floor and we need a second for that. Would you -- could we restate that motion, please? MS. SULLIVAN: Madam Chair, I may -- if I may recommend a little more on the staff's recommendation, Mr. Hill's indicated that he has some cleanup scheduled for Dece.~ber. I was thinking, you know, January 1st for your next board meeting, give him ample time to -- and I'd also like to state for the record I'm not here to put Mr. Hill out of business, but please understand that I'm working on a complaint and I'm charged with enforcing the code as -- as at this point I interpret it. MS. SAUNDERS: So, the motion before us at this point is to recommend that Mr. Hill's towing operation be put into compliance and all vehicles and debris on the property be removed by January 1st or a fine be imposed daily after that. MS. SULLIVAN: Yes. I would remind the board that the violations did include -- other than cars, it included litter and car parts debris, so we would -- we would recommend that the whole -- MS. SAUNDERS: That all violations be -- MS. SULLIVAN: -- all violations be removed. MS. SAUNDERS: Or a fine of what, a hundred dollars per day? MS. SULLIVAN: That would be staff's recommendation. MR. HILL: I'm curious about something if I -- if I can intrude into this and this is going to be -- what the motion is, is that we be required to move all vehicles from the property or we're going to be ~ined & hundred dollars a day? Is that what I hear? MS. RAWSON: Actually, I don't think the motion has been made yet, Mr. Hill, and really, in all fairness, we've closed the public Page 36 November 14, 1997 portion. Let them finish their deliberations and their vote and then I'm sure they would be happy to explain to you what they've done. MS. SAUNDERS: I will second that motion. Is there any further -- any discussion on that? MS. TAYLOR: I have one question. Until this matter gets straightened up of -- of whether she o~s the property or whether she doesn't, who's going to be paying this -- this fine if this is not done? It surely isn't going to be this poor woman. MIR. HILL: Is it going to be this poor man? MS. TAYLOR: Well, you're the one that's conducting business. MS. RAWSON: Well, let me -- let me answer that question. You have -- or the county has cited them both. Okay. You have a quitclaim deed that says she's the owner. He clearly is the lessee. You can cite both lessee and owner. And, so, you have now the power, if you wish, to levy the fine against one or both. It's your discretion. MS. TAYLOR: I make the motion that it be imposed against the lessee. MS. SAUNDERS: Well, that -- is that -- would that be considered a second motion? We haven't voted on the first one yet. MS. P~WSON: Yeah, I think that you should either amend your motion to include everything. It would probably be better if you include your motion -- amend your motion to include everything° how long he has to remove, that you think there's a violation, what the fine should be, and who the fine should be levied against and when it should start. MS. SAUNDERS: Well, we did -- okay. Let me go back. The motion was,- I believe, that all violation -- that the property is in violation, that all violations must be removed on or before January 1st, 1998; thereafter, a fine of $100 per day to be levied until such time it is done. We will need an amendment or an adjustment to the motion then as to who the fine is to be levied against. MR. OXLEY: Can I raise a question? MS. SAUNDERS: Yeah. ~R. OXLEY: Do you really think that the first day of January is sufficient time? Does MJ. Hill think that's sufficient time? That seems to be a little bit scarce to me. I could be wrong, but that doesn't seem like very much time. The holidays are coming and everybody is on holiday, et cetera, et cetera. I do not think that it's sufficient time to have Mr. Hill do what he's supposed to do. MR. DeVITO: I think we ought to move it back another month. MR. OXLEY: I mean, he's been there for 13 years. Another six months wouldn't hurt to do everything legally to get it all done, get all the problems done, get everything legally done, because that property has been there for all this time, you know. Give him six months to get it done and then after that, yes, say a hundred dollars a day. I've got no problem with that. MS. TAYLOR: Six months is way too long, way too long. Page 37 ,,,,,,, ~ ~ ll,llllllll I I IIII II IIII IIIIIIII .... I November 14, 1997 MR. LAVINSKI: Yeah, that's totally unreasonable, I think. MS. TAYLOR: Totally unreasonable. MR. LAVINSKI: Yeah. Absolutely. MS. TAYLOR: I agree with staff. I agree with staff. I -- i stick to that. MR. OXLEY: What does the Code Enforcement Board think? I mean, the -- MR. HEDRICH: I would extend it -- MR. DeVITO: I could see extending it a little. %¢hat you -- you're talking over 200 vehicles here now in parts, so -- MR. OXLEY: Right, and the holidays are coming. MS. SAUNDERS: Well, most of them were going to be removed, I believe, in early December by the salvage operation. MR. DeVITO: Was that so, Mr. Hill, most of them? MR. HILL: We were intending on clearing a large part of the vehicles out somewhere -- sometime in December, date unknown, probably will run up very close to Christmas. I'd -- I'd also need to know how many vehicles I could keep, and if I can't keep any, I need to know what to tell the owners of the vehicles that I have to get rid of. NS. SA~DERS: ~at is the length -- the length of time -- i know we're back in the public hearing. I'm sorry. ~at is the maximum length of time that you need to keep a vehicle after you've towed it by law? MR. HILL: We're required, minimum time, 37 days from -- from stop to start and then sometimes that can double or triple or quadruple depending on whether or not paper~aork goes through properly with the county or the state. MS. SAUNDERS: How often does it quadruple? MR. HILL: It doesn't quadruple very often. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. How often? MR. HILL: Occasionally, it will double or triple. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. So, doubling, which would be 37, 35, 74 days is not unusual, is that what you're indicating or --- MR. HILL: It's not unusual to go that long on some vehicles. We have -- we have others that -- that sometimes run even longer because we don't only have to deal with the county and the state but with the newspaper, with proper advertisements, with human error, all -- all of the things are involved in notifying the owners and doing everything, you know, within the letter of the law. MS. SAUNDERS: To continue the gist of the discussion on the motion, what to me seems fair is to say that the property basically needs to be cleared by January 1st. If there are vehicles that are in legal process and therefore must be kept for longer than that, that we grant an extension on those vehicles that the paperwork exists on for that period of time, so that if there is a vehicle that is being held by Mr. Hill's business that he towed now and needs 60 days or 90 days, that we grant that extension for that period only; if there's anything else on the property, that the fine does go in there. And I would -- I again hate putting any business out of business. Page 38 [ [ [[1[i [in[[ Illl I Illlllllllll IIllll II Illllll I~l II Illll I i6G1 November 14, 1997 I would say that Mr. Hill needs to find another location for the maintaining of these vehicles and if the cost is prohibitive, then Highway Patrol is going to have to pay it because they don't have any other choice. Somebody is going to tow those vehicles. MR. HILL: We're -- we're not entitled to raise our rates per Florida Statutes for one thing. And the other -- the other question is that if we own vehicles, if we have clear title to those vehicles, do we have to dispose of them also or are we entitled to keep them on the property? MS. SAUNDERS: Not on the property as I -- as I interpret the zoning laws. No, you are -- well, I guess what we're saying is, no, you are not entitled to keep any vehicles on the property other than the wrecker, the towing truck. MS. TAYLOR: And in the meantime, while we're waiting for 51t this -- this -- these legal vehicles to be in there, how many n,ore are going to be brought in? Then this is going to be another -- MS. SAUNDERS: Well, I think our -- our thing is that anything that's brought in from now must be gone by January 1st or stored somewhere else. Anything that's on the property now, if it has an extension and he by law must hold it, then he's got -- you ~now, then we're not going to go back and say, you've got to find another place to hold that particular vehicle. We're going -- what I'm -- I'm recommending, I guess, is that we exempt what his business has on the property right now if by law he's required to hold it for longer than the 30 days or the 45 days. Everything else, including what's brought in tomorrow, must be off the property by January 1st or the fine is imposed. Is that -- that's how -- what I would believe is fair. Any-- MR. OXLEY: I just have a little problem with that period of time. MR. SAUNDERS: The time frame? MR. OXLEY: The time zone to me is not sufficient to allow him to do exactly what has to be done within the law and everything else. think it's going to take longer than that. I think he should be allowed the opportunity to have more time than January the !st. MS. SULLIVAN: Madam Chair, staff would have no objection to giving him 90 days or however long it takes from the beginning so that he doesn't have to come back and -- and all of us deal with the paperwork as to when -- when -- what -- I mean, if that's sufficient time. If it's 37 days, it seems 90 days would take -- MS. SAUNDERS: Ninety days should be more than sufficient. MS. SULLIVAN: -- most -- yeah. We don't have any objection to giving him a reasonable time at all. MS. SAUNDERS: Would that be a -- MR. DeVITO: March lst? March meeting? MS. SAUNDERS: All right, then -- MS. P~WSON: Well, we need a -- we need an amendment to the motion. MR. DeVITO: March meeting? Page 39 16Gi , November 14, 1997 MR. OXLEY: March 1st. MS. RAWSON: And I think Miss Taylor made the motion so it would have to be her amendment. MS. SAUNDERS: Would you be willing to amend your motion to state that by March 1st all violations must be cleared or a fine of $100 per day extends -- begins immediately at that point? MS. TAYLOR: I think it's too long, but if staff goes along with that, that's what I will amend it to. MS RAWSON: 'Okay. Then we need a second to be -- who was -- MS SAUNDERS: I think I seconded it. MS RAWSON: Okay. MS SAUNDERS: And I will second that. MS RAWSON: So, that second is okay with you? MS SAUNDERS: Uh-huh. MS RAWSON: Okay. MS SAUNDERS: Any further discussion? (No response.) MS. SAUNDERS: All in favor? Any opposed? (No response.) MS. SAUNDERS: The motion is carried. Now, what do I do? Is -- MS. RAWSON: Do you have any questions about the order? MR. HILL: If I understand clearly, then I have till March ist to clear all violations, and that would be any vehicle that is not currently in process for title or in -- currently in process for title or certificate of destruction? MS. SAUNDERS: No. That's -- - MR. HILL: Question on that. If -- if I acquire a title for a vehicle, then how long do I have after I acquire title to dispose of it? MS. SAUNDERS: By March 1st, all vehicles -- you may keep the vehicle as long as you like. MR. HILL: I'm sorry. I -- MS SAUNDERS: You may not keep it on that property. MR HILL: I'm sorry. I wasn't clear about that. MS SAUNDERS: Okay. HILL: After March the 1st -- MS SAUNDERS: Yes. MR HILL: -- if I acquire title for a vehicle, how long do I have after I acquire title to the vehicle to maintain or hold that vehicle before I have to give it away? MS. SAUNDERS: On the present property, zero days. You must find another location to hold that vehicle, a second location for that -- the storage of those vehicles. MSR. HILL: Is -- is there any room, you know, with this board or with zoning as far as the storage of vehicles on that property, since it's been used for so many years and with the blessing of the county, to utilize that property for that purpose, not for the, quote-unquote, storage of salvage, but the storage of vehicles that we have acquired Page 40 November 14, 1997 through the law? MS. SAUNDERS: I believe you'd have to ask the County Com,~ission or the planning -- MS. SULLIVAN: If I -- if I may, the length of time chat he has to -- to abate the violation, March 1st, that gives him plenty of time to go and talk with planning, make whatever applications and get some kind of idea of what he -- what he might be able to do. M~. HILL: Well, I'm -- I appreciate the time. That -- that's going to get -- at least give me enough room to get things taken care of. I -- I -- I think Code Enforcement could be a little more supportive in the fact that this service is required out there, and I think this board could also be supportive in that. I think you're going to find that if there are -- is not a towing service in eastern Collier County, that the general public is going to suffer, that law enforcement is going to suffer, that the cost for services for everyone involved is going to suffer and you're biting off your nose to spite my face. And, you know, I don't want to quit working. You'll be putting me out of work, you'll be putting my son, my daughter-in-law, my grandson won't have -- his parents won't be working and, you know, you're going to affect a substantial number of people here in your decisions today. MS. SAUNDERS: Are there any other actions before the board? MS. CRUZ: No, ma'am. MS. SAUNDERS: Any new business? MS. RAWSON: I have a couple. I don't know if it's new business or old business or maybe it comes under the information section. The last time we had a discussion about the purpose of alternates, and I said the alternates sit in only if someone's missing and fortunately we have them today, and the question came up -- and they don't vote unless they're needed. Then the question came up, what happens if there's only six people here and we have a tie? Or four people? And, again, I talked with the attorney for the north board so that we're always doing the same thing in both boards, and we didn't really cover that in the rules that we've written, but I -- my interpretation and his, and so, I guess, this is -- will be our interpretation for you, is that if there are -- is a six six -- three-three vote, and six of you are here or there is a tie, then it doesn't pass. It just simply fails to pass. So, that's one question. The other thing is, you know, Miss Sullivan asked a couple months ago if we could look into some amendments to the ordinance -- of course, I can't do that but we've certainly recommended that the County Attorney do it, about notice because notice is always such a problem. And I actually don't know whether they're working on that or not, but I just wanted this board to know that I have a meeting next week with the attorney from the north board and with the County Attorney to Page 41 November 14, 1997 ~talk about notice requirements. So, we haven't forgotten about that. We're not unmindful of the problems that Miss Sullivan and staff have had in complyiuq with notice regulations. We don't want to waste the board's time. We don't want to have to make her renotice everybody and go through that every time. We want to move these cases along so she doesn't have a backlog. And, so, I will report to you in January as to the results of the meeting that I hage with the two attorneys next week. MS. SAUNDERS: Thank you. Our next meeting date, according to -- go ahead -- is January 9th. MR. DeVITO: Do we have -- we have another case? MS. SAUNDERS: No, I think it was -- wasn't the third case continued? MS. SULLIVAN: We continued that because the trustee had changed, and we have to go back and find out who the new trustee is. MS. SAUNDERS: There you go. MR. CARRUTHERS: Could I ask a question? MS. SAUNDERS: Certainly. MR. CARRUTHERS: I was told to be here today. MS. SAUNDERS: Could you identify yourself for the record, sir? MR. CARRUTHERS: Carruthers, representing I. K. Stewart. MR. DeVITO: I remember you, yes. MS. SAUNDERS: I haven't been here in awhile. ) Does code -- staff have any -- MS. SULLIVAN: No, ma'am. I remember that was Miss Owens' case unless he was here for a report. We usually go through the minutes and ~ake sure everybody comes back, but -- MR. CARRUTHERS: I was told to be here and I waived the notice. MS. SULLIVAN: Okay. Do you remember why we told you to be here? MR. CARRUTHERS: No. We just said we're getting a permit to do the work on the property which we're -- have applied for. MS. SULLIVAN: Okay. Have you obtained the permit? MR. CARRUTHERS: We haven't obtained it. It's in for permit. MS. SULLIVAN: Okay. I suggest that we put Mr. Carruthers on for next month and -- and -- as a report. Would that be okay? MR. CARRUTHERS: That's fine with me. MS. SULLIVAN: Not next month. January the -- MR. CARRUTHERS: I'm afraid not to come. MS. SULLIVAN: I'm sorry you had to come. MR. CARRUTHERS: Thank you. MS. SULLIVAN: January the 9th, Mr. Carruthers. MR. CARRUTHERS: All right. MS. SULLIVAN: See you again. MS. SAUNDERS: Is there any other business? Okay. MS. TAYLOR: I have something that I want to say that's bothering me very much. Page 42 November 14, 1997 This board has been put together to bring people into compliance, not have the illusions of being a Robin Hood, and it bothers me very much when we see something that is --is so blatant and then have arguments among ourselves about whether we should proceed or not. It's -- this is our job. This is why we're here. If this is not why you got on this board, then I think you better think twice about remaining. That's my opinion. MS. RAWSON: Miss Saunders, I -- I have been reminded, and I apologize that I didn't pick up on this sooner. We actually didn't say who the fine should be levied against and, you know, if you don't give me any other direction, the fine is going to be levied against both respondents. Did you intend to make some other arrangement? If not, you know, that's the way I'll write the order. MS. SAUNDERS: Maybe we'd better discuss that. MR. OXLEY: It should depend on what happens in the court case. MS. SAUNDERS: My feeling is that from a Code Enforcement standpoint, it has to be against both at this point. MS. RAWSON: Okay. MS. SAUNDERS: If that's who -- MS. RAWSON: Well, I'm not -- I'm not trying to change anybody's mind. MS. SAUNDERS: No. MS. RAWSON: I just want to clarify the way I write the order. MS. SAUNDERS: Legally, that is who the violation was brought ~against; is that correct? MS. RAWSON: Yes, both. MS. SAUNDERS: And it seems to me a court other than us needs to dete%-mine who is legally the owner of the business and the rest and -- MS. RAWSON: Okay. MS. SAUNDERS: -- while I sympathize completely, I don't think we have the authority to decide that. MS. RAWSON: Thank you. MS. SAUNDERS: But I don't know. That's just my opinion. If the other people -- can we take an informal straw poll on how we all feel? I know -- MS. TAYLOR: You know how I feel. MS. SAUNDERS: Definitely. Does everybody else -- MR. DeVITO: I remember a long time ago when I was a young boy, I was assigned a terrible, terrible police precinct to work in in the South Bronx, so I wanted to talk to somebody to get some insight. And I picked a homicide detective from -- it was a good friend of mine, John Corbet (phonetic), and I asked John, I says, John, you know, how do I go about my job and what should I -- and he said one thing. He said, "Don't ever lose your compassion." And I never intend to. MR. OXLEY: My basic feeling is that the individual has rights and the Government is not always right. That's my basic feeling. MS. SAUNDERS: How does that translate to Miss Rawson writing the order? Page 43 6G1 November 14, 1997 MR. DeVITO: The order is okay with me. MS. SAUNDERS: I -- I -- I agree with what we're all saying. I do think that we have to, as much as we can, remember who -- that there are people and businesses and lives affected about by what we do and we're not trying to be dictators or arbitrary but we have a law that we have to follow, too. MR. OXLEY: Well, they are going to court prior to that date, so MS. HILL: Can I talk? MS. SAUNDERS: Sure. MS. HILL: I understand fines and stuff, but when I'd asked him to clean it, I wrote him letters, certified, and he ignores those, why should I be punished for something he's doing that I have -- he's leasing the land from me. I have asked him to clean the mess up, so why should I be punished because he's doing something wrong? MS. SAUNDERS: I don't think you should be punished at all. MS. HILL: Well, if they're saying that the landowner, I am the landowner. It's still in court, but I have asked him to clean his mess up, so why should I be fined? MS. SAUNDERS: I think it -- I'm not an attorney again, but I think it's a simple -- fairly simple matter for your attorney to specify that you have done what you can and your -- your tenant is in violation and that you're not responsible. But I don't think that this group -- I was going to say court -- the Code Enforcement people can, but I think your attorney can get a ~'~very simple order to do something to that effect. Our intent is not to fine you for what Mr. Hill is doing. It's not to put Mr. Hill out of business. It's to help keep the codes. - Is there any further business? (No response.) MS. SAUNDERS: And I'll declare it, meeting adjourned, and I'm going to turn this back to Randy next time. MS. RAWSON: Thank you, Miss Saunders, and I will be seeking you out to sign as the acting chair -- MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. MS. RAWSON: -- this order, so thank you very much. Nice job. MS. SAUNDERS: Thank you. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10:38 a.m. BOM /-R N Y cm im, N Page 44 · ' November 14, 1997 "'TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. BY ROSE M. WITT, RPR Page 45 '1 i-:,~II.:I{(;I.,*N(~Y .XlI.:I)I(;AI, .%1-:1~,V1('1*2'; Ai)VIS()RY (I':.~INA,(') A(; I**.N I)A ,l:tilu:lry 2~. 199~ 2:()0 I).~!. I i !'.*,.~ I,T! I lit!II,DIN(; 3t~'~ I"1,()() R $301 i':A,gT '1',.%1~11A~i I 'I'I~IAI, ('Al,I, T() ()l,I) I'le:l.~e tl(}lC: [)ITC I() Illl:l~,'()i(I;ll)J4.' 4.'()ll$111itlll(,'lll~ - thc .l;llltl;ll'%' (I;ll~' h:t.~ I)~'t'JI ~'ll;tu~'cl I()Iht' fo.rth ~¥~.'(lu~'.~(l;L~'..I;inu:lr¥ 2~. EMER(;ENCY ,MEI)ICAL SERVICES AI)VIS()RY C()t;NCII. (EMSAC) INF()R,MAL MINI, ITES l)ecember 17. 1997 1:30 lL.M. E~i i-;R(; EN(;Y ,M l';i)l(;:ki. SERVI(;ES I! I".A i)(.)I!A 33(~ I i';nsl Tamia mi 'l'ra il Council Members Bob Laird Excused N'Icmbcrs (iar¥ Y~:ung Fay Biles j P (;unther-Mohr I{hona Saulldcrs Sheldon Reed [)~tltll~l Ftls~rl Ot hers Bob Fcrnan(lez Leo Ochs Diane B Flagg Jeff Page John Yonkoskv 'i'hcrcsa Rciscn Thc regular monthly meeting of thc ('otlicr ('otnllv EMSA(' committee xsan called to order al 1.30 P Xl on Wednesday. December 17. 19~;7 by Itoh I,aird. ('hairman Fay Biles made a motion to accept the minutes Commander Rccd requested lo amend Iht minutes fi'om N~xcmbcr 2-1. mcctmg 'l'hc minutes stated ('hicl'Jim Tobin would be attending thc I(XIS,,X(' mcctins a~ thc clotted Presidentofthe North Naples Fire Commission ('hicl"l'olm~xxillbcatlcndinsthc EMS,&(' rotc'ling as the elected President oI'thc ('oilier I:irc ('hicl's ..Xss~ciation Fay lIilcs amundcd Ih~ motion lbr thc ~llinutcs 1~ be accu'ptcd with ibc ct~rructitm includu'd Rhona Satmdcrs scctmdcd thc tIlt~lit~l Xtinulcs were accepted ('hicfliob Schank expressed his apprucialion, as Prcsidcm ol'lh~ ('oilier l:irc ('hicl' Association. Ibr II1c Ol)purlunily Io serve t)fl Iht I~MSA(' l]()ard This is ,)tic ol'lhc mosl aggressive board's hc has seen, and hc ~sould like .~ a~ain slate thai ll]u [':M~ surs icc in this COtlllty is suctmd to IlOllC in thc Sliltc of Florida NE%V BIISINESS: ('hairrnan Laird imluirud as to rite medic who handled thc accidcm (m .Saturdav night. involvin~ Del)Ul.v Joc Jone.s ('hiuf I:la,~,~ inl'ormcd lhu commillct: ('al~tain ()rlc~a ~ as ~hc medic tm scene ('hiul' Fla~ reported there has bccn ;.in cm,mous incrca.~c in lhliflilics in ;t shorl poi :.,~d ~l' time. than she ctmld recall in thc pasl This can he atlribt,lc this to thc hulidaxs and al~,, (;or(Ion River Ilri(llze: ('hicl' I:la,_,,_, rulJortud ~;hu had met x,.ith ('hicl' l{iu:dJt:sk illld tiler arc h)ukin- opti(ms such ils I~l'c-CXCl~q)li()n clcxiccs A prc-cxumpti()n dcxicc is a dc'x icc that changes thc lighl to red in all t~thcr dircctitms II ;llloxxs Iht tr;tll]c throtJgJl thc itltc'rscclitHi in thc tlircclitm thc ;tlllbHJilflCC iS travclin~ ,,XllO~Jlcr be to put addititmal oJ]]cCl'S ill thc bridge Thc emergency vehicles xsotdd have radii) contacl xvith thc oil]cur, letting thc oil]ocr know thc direction they arc apprtmchin~ tire estimated time ol'arrival to Iht location Wu arc cxpcctin~ a much hi~Jlcr I:av Biles wiintcd to kr~oxx il'this inlbrmati(m, in statistic'al Ibrm. had hccn ~ix un t,, thc ('olliur ('otmtv ('ommissioncrs and F()('I 'N ('hiufl:hi~ slated thc (',dlicr ('tmmfissitmcrs had rcccixud thc .,~It.:R (.,~mhulancc Inxcnlt,'v [Ji)datc Rcp~rl) I'hi, rcporl rcl]cct~ thc I~t~ptdalion tJptl~ltu prt).jcctitms arid thc capital ncucl~ t~) mutt thc J)OJ~tlJilliOll I};:sL'cl t)ll lilt (Jl'Ox~lh SliII1[I~L'I11CIll iflan IJlu ILglS ol'~anizillion dclicit td'(mc trail It xYas rcct)mlncmlcd a unit he placed in (;t)Iclcn (J;llc [(stales this past rcporl to bc scnl x~ith thc minutes Chict' l:la~g inlbrmcd thc ~rOUl~ ('omm:lndcr's lipri~hl and Rockuv haxu dcvclopud inl~rmalitm in rc~arcts lu salttr%' ti]ltl bunclil's and tls thc infi)rmalion pro~rcsscs I~H'lhcr she will come to thc ~l'()tlJ) the Rolary ('luh lasl ',,.uuk ;~mt hc did ;I l'anla~lic j~b Sl')Ccinl Ri.,;k l.c~bh~h.m'~ ('hicf I:la~ cxplail~ed Ihe Si)ccial Risk I.t:~islalion l.aw ILnl'cu'cemem ()lticers. & Fire receive, even though they all ~oi'k to~ulhcr on the snmc scene anti rio thc sltmc actix i~ic~ Special Risk came Io he I1KlIly 5cil1'5 tiao. x~hCll Paramedic's x~uru m;l uctuallv a prol~ssion Thu Ihu'amudic has truly hucomc a I~rol~ssitm in thc caruur fluid in the h.~t 2f~ years Thc medics x~urk daih' x~ith ~ncruascd CXlmSuru to I IIV and Aids Thc ('uliic~ (~Otlilly ('ommi~ioncrs x~ill hc a,kud in thc fi~It;rc lo paw a rustdt;ti~m of SUl~l~o~t I~r Ibc gpccial Risk t~r thc I'aramudics ('hiul' I"h;g~ also stalud I(XI5 xvuuld certainly ~q~p~ccbtc thc Advisory lloard's supiX~rl ~d'this lu~i~latk;n Commission I hmcock is in St;l~p~*rt ~d' thc gpucial Risk t;Itimatulx il taku~ apl~ovul Ii'om the I:Iorida lu~islaturc Xl~mv c~,unt;c, have paxsud ;'u~olutiun ol'supix,~t and hum these to thc I:lorida I.u~i~h~lu~u (~ounlv .,\dmilfistralor I:urnamtc,, ml'~u mod Ibc .,Xdvistu'v Board thc cmpIoFcc makes conlril~utitm Io Iht 51alu lox~',ud. ~clilcmc~tl l'his is all paid hx Iht c~nlics and lhc Thc diltL'rcncc Iht COtllllv x~otlld p',tx I~cl~cc~ nn Cml~lOycc ~ ilht~ul ~pcc~:~l r~sk ;md that is with Ibc special risk is ~LhotLI l I". Thc ('ountx' :~dlllilli~tr~llOl Is ot'thc opmitm CnlpIt~ycc is cxpt~xctt [t~ iht tliL~SCJ'~ t~l'hi~h risk. ~huv shtmltl rcccixc Ihu ~pcckd rbk bcncl]ts ('cmmmndcr Ruud Stalud thc Nal')lcs I'olicu ami l:.mur~uncv .Hut',. icu..t ha,.c ;~ policy lhcv have I)ct.'ll \ur% ill'()-;l~.'l i\ c IlI;.ikilp, >,tire II1c hc'Ht.'l]l.,¢ ,,o {t~ xx Ilt~ (k.'XUl x c:¢ lhclll ('hict' l:la~ l'~;~ss,..d uul a ch;u't tm .$1'~ccial I'~isk lhat had hucn compilud l~v I.t WahurKopka. xxh~hasx~orkud xcrvtlili~cmlytm~cttinsthishilludpasscd I lchas contactcdvaritm~ctmntiusi~=,,ul thcirpo~ititmsandimpact I Icwasno[il]cdthat ('amphcll ~lm i~ thc Vicu ('hair ~1' Iht (;t~x crm~cnlal RctUrm and ()~ cr~i~hl ('tmmm~cc has a~rccd Io sponsor Ibc hill 'l'hi~ is thc first committee thc hill will eo ~o Thc hill ~ill HOt ~uCCJ lO ~0 to ~J CoIH~itlu'u' il~ Ibc I Itmsu'. hcc~itlsc it passed Iht I ltmsc htsl year It k~ill ,,o straiuht lo thc Iltx~l thi~ xua, ('hicl'l"hm .... Xt;llcd thc I{X'15 l)Cl~arlnlctll XCl'X npl~rccialcs ('ommissitm I hmc,,cl, ;~,~tt ('~,tml~ ..Xdminixtralt,r I:cma,~dcz l? II I)(; i'.' T: John Yonkoskv im.~.~ud ~)tll thc ..\mlmhmcu lIillin~ .%tatu.~ I~.uporl Thc hi~.sus! month.,¢ I'tu c~lsh I]oxv is .lanuary. I"d~ruarv. Xlarcll illltl ..\p~il I1 looks like wu arc $ If,IL_'.9,X behind hut 1661 hi ;tctualitv ~'.c ;u'c ~lhcml %Vt arc un Ir~tck ]'nmi :t c~lsh Iluw pcJ'Sl]CClkc From thc hHIh]~ portiere . Il]ix is Ibc ciMllth nl~mth wc m'c bdow thc Ordinance rmluircmcnl in ~Cltill~ thc bills uut Thc rclmrt from Mc(ticarc Ihilt ',vill shm..v whether IVIcdicm'c ~vill incrclisc :r~ci,. rdml'x,rscmcnl Fur li~l,$ services h;~s nul hccn received It ',,,'ill hc thc cml bcl'cu'c Iht rcporl ix ,',..:ccivctt. John Y~mkoskv ~,.,ill mx mi:kc il rcc~mmlumkui~m I'ur I:.:',,IS I)clXU'tmcnt ~;~tc.'¢ tmtil hu kmn~ wh~u Iht ~]cdic~u'c rcimlmrscmcnl fmcs will hc l:it,,, 1½lies taxi ILhona .$tmndcrs bt~l.h l'ch it PR s.;tlucmcnt nccd,,zd m hc rclcitscd tt~ inl'urm thc lmhlic thc r'i~lus ('~)Lll:t',,' :\dministri:tor l.loh l:cri:ml(lu/, ix umlcr lllc irnl)rcssion llmt thc ;ictu;ll ct:st Imn,'idiny thc sc:',icc ix cSSUlltiilllv ~vriltun tltn~n hy thc illllt)tlllt tit':Id vlilt)rcni There is ii lice:sion made every >'ciu' ut'ho~ much ct'thc cost is p:iid thr:~u~h Iilxcs how much is pilid dircclly Ihou~hl Iht cha:'~cs wu Icy>' Somu ctmlilics hiivc mi:dc Xlcdicaru l]i~ynicnl.~ :irc maximizud ~ilh ~hu lhcorv Ilml mosl ~ill hc cli~il:lu Thc ('hict' l:hlL, jg. ,,:xphmlt.'d scvurtJl ,.'cra'.,: ii? Ih:Il COl11111.{lllil:,,' 1111,.'lllilCl'S Vt, till tl/l thc ('uu:ltv ('om::lissi:.mcrx ,:vcr thc high CuSl ::l'lhu ilillJ):tililncc hills 'l'hcrc :',,..iix ~.Cl",/ Stl'till~ SUl'q::u't to yuttin,,__ no hill ::t Jill. iuxl hci,:,,~ lotiillv SUpl'x:rtcd I':','..,\Il Vilh:rcm tl::lhir,< its tiiL' ::thor puhlic sat'~tv ;:ye,lc:us ;.Iru, Sl:ccit]ctlll>, police lind tiru dcp;lrtlllcnts Ti:crc wils i:lso SUl'qX:r! I0 utilize insurance dolhu's ..\t tllilt limo :xlcdic:::-t: rlCilliI"itll'sL.'lllClll WilS S]()(). tilt hill :.'.:ts I'~]:' '",t .$_. Il and tho l'x:tiunt ',,.ii.', hill,.:d l'cu' $.¢,tJ Il:) .Since th;it Iii:lc thc l~u ch:lll'~Cl.[ It) John ",'onkoskk xti~lu(l ;: Ibc o1'$£? ~ ~;I.~ ~¢01 ol: NUl:tumhur 27. I~):J-I .,~l Ihzu lime thc~ rc~ion Ihal ::rc rcccivin~ a hi~hcr ruimhursumcnl Ihml ~vc arc COlnniiIIcc con~idcr lakin~ Iht co~l ::l'livin~ incru::su uvury yu:~r ::ml udd lhal un h: Iht Igc. Ihal wtiy you m~:inlai:l I::axi:nixin~ Iht rck clit~c l~'onl Xlcdic:u'c Xlcdic:u'c I'CJlrCSClll~ 4()0'o J)J't){ll' lOlilJ I'CVClltlC Leo ()ohs il:lbrnlud thc conmiilluc itl'il [cccnl ~,'Icdic:lid mldil :il' thc l)ul::l['~mc:ll t~l' I{uvcr&uc flu itskctt John '(oukoskv I~: L'xph,in lhu itudit lo Iht ctmm:illcc Jtdm inl~u nlcd thc o,:n'mliltmz ~'ludicaid cram.: itl mid ',,.:,.'hi :r,'cr ;t r'mxloln si:]:Ii,lilly ol'tril'~ tickets Their midil covers il i)uriod li'tll:l '"/I?').] ll.i '" l,",)7 Thc!,' pru.sunlctl Jill tllIV~, rillcll :.lclmmtl l'~r $2N0.000 in overlmym~:nts 'i'hruu ol'our Paramedics wuru askud by thc Dupar:mum of Revenue to. u~in~ thc samu critu,'ia, i)urlbrn~ a SUl)aratu audit and hasud on N1cdic;ud'~ criteria, the i~a,'amuclic's l~Jl thu ovurj)ayniunl should hu $1.]0.00() Mudicaid disa~ruud with the levd ol'survice, example Mudicaid I~h that a child with a suvuruly sevurud thumb should llOt J)¢ ti tralisport, lilly CotlJd have ~one by private vehicle Aliur s~vcral discussions, bu~vuun I)OR. ('Otlllly Altornuy's ()fi]ce and Mudicaid. S l60.000 payahlu over a three year period ;vith no interest was agrceal~lu lo all parties. When this agreement is signed by thc Board a $.qO,O00 paymcm ;viii be mitclc and S lO,Of)() every other momh until ltdl payment. This will be pres~nlcd lo thc Btuu'd tm Janu;trv 13. l')')S The committee uxpres.~ud their "thanks" t'or thu ('hri.,ctma.,¢ hmchctm Thc lucclin~ ad.jtmrncd I~.¢Sl'~Cct t'u Ily stJhmittctl. i.~arbtlr,t Iii'o;,, n ;~97 AUIR FACILITY ~UMMARY FOR/l{_ Facility Type: Emergency Medical Services (Category B) Level of Service Standard: .000068 units per capita Unit Cost: $747,300 per unit (vehicle + building) Unit~ Walue/Cost Available Inventory 9/30/97: 14 $10,462,200 Required Inventory 9/30/02: 19 14,198,700 Planned CIE FY98-02 5 3,736,500 5-year Surplus or (Deficit): 0 0 1. gxisD~nq Revenue SOurces:. A. Planned CIE FY98-02 EMS Impact Fees $1,879,400 $1,857,10Q Capital Ad Valorem $3,736,500 B. 5-year Deficit 0 2. Supplemental Revenue Sources:. A. Alternative I None Required B.Alternative II None Required Recommended Action:.. That the BCC direct Staff to include ,'Planned CIE FY98-02" projects in the Eighth CIE Update and Amendment. DEO 1 6 lg9 50 P;. ~ i681 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COUNCIL (EMSAC) INFORMAl, MINUTES January 28, 1998 2:00 P.M. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES tiEADQUARTERS 3301 Enst Tamiami 'Frail Council Members Present: Bob Laird Excused: Mike Davis Roger Evans George Lea,non Rhona Saunders Orly Stohs. Lt. Gail Dolan J.P. Gunther-Mohr Jorge Aguilera. Commander i~.. _ Fay Biles Diane B. Flagg. Chief Barbara Brown The regular monthly meeting o£ the Collier County EMSAC committee was called to order at 2:05 P.M. on Wednesday. JanuaD, 28. 1908 by Bob Laird. Chairman. Chairman Laird introduced Gall Dolnn. Vice President of Emergency Services. Gall will be represenling Naples Community Hospitnl in plnce of Palina Fuson who has to resign her position due to work commitments. Lt. Orly Stolts. Assistant Training Office. was present in lieu of Captain Jim Tobirt. the newly elected president of the Fire Chict~ Association. Fay Biles madea motion to nccept the minutes of the December 17. 1997 meeting 2"a by Rhona Saunders. Motion Passed. OLD BUSINESS: After a discussion on the meeting date Fay Biles made a motion the regular monthly meeting date be held on the last Wednesday of each month at 2:00 P.M. Rhona second tim motion. Motion passed. The next regular meeting date will be Febma~ 25. 1908 at 2 O0 P.M. ~rris ~ / Hanc~k . ~ ~ C~stant Ine_ ~' --- ~ac'Kle ~ ~ Chief Flagg. went over thc options f.or the traffic on thc Gordon River Bridge. Some of thc options being I(mkcd at are' Far right hand lane heing used as an emergency vehicle lane. radio controlled intersection, or pre-emption device. Special Risk: Chief Flagg, Chief report a positive outcome at the Board of Commissioners meeting. They agreed to a Resolution of Support for Special Risk to provide to the State House and Senate. The Florida Association of EMS, EMS Providers, Florida EMS Advisory Council have all supported thc Special Risk legislation, and Senator Chris will be the sponsor. This bill passed tile ttousc in last years legislation, it never made it to the Senate last year Fay Biles questioned Chie£ Flagg about the statement Dr. Tobcr made at the Board of Commissioners presentation for Special Risk reference EMS losing 40 Paramedics in the past few year. Chief Flagg stated wc recently had a paramedic who had been with EMS for 3 )'ears and lel't to go to Marco Island Fire and make more money and have better benefits and not have near the responsibilities, Chief. Flagg stated a Task Team had been working on a salary survey, using the League of Cities Salary Survey They have prepared a proposal, presen:.ed it to the County Administrator, and are in the process of making son,: changes and will present the proposal again. Gall Dolan stated maybe the retention salary needed to be looked at instead of the entry. Chief. Flagg stated that is what Task Team addressed. Fay Biles wanted to know if' the gentlemen that went to Marco was an EMT or Paramedic. as most the of men at Marco were EXiT's. Chief. Flagg stated he was a Paramedic and is going to Marco Island to become a firel}ghter. There arc eight to nine employees that are crossed trained firefighters and paramedics, and another fifiet:n to twenty that are enrolled in fire school right now Data Collection: ChiefFlagg stated thc Data Collection Project is on tract, it will put this system well out in front of any other system in the state in terms of data collection, data retrieval, being able to do research projects There was not a program available to meet tt~ese needs. We brought in a Paramedic who has a tremendous level of. expertise in writing computer programs. He developed this program and we are now doing parallel testing where ~.t~e sol:tware has been installed on the computers at the station. They are running thc old system (bubble scan) along with the new (parallel test) to compare. The old system will then be eliminated, Miami Dade, a large system on the East Coast, they are just now going to the bubble scan system. That is how f.ar ahead of. tile other systems we are in terms of data collection. Jorge Aguilera stated we are exporting inlbrmation to the Department of Revenue. Medics reports are convened to codes and the codes automatically converts to billing codes which saves the DOR many hours ofmamml work. Bob l,aird stated the Advisory Board members talk to the Commissioners from time to time on various issue's and he requested when they happen to be in discussion with them to mention tile Paramedic's salaries. Fay Biles asked it' the starting salary, was $7.69 an hour now, or was it going to $7 69 an hour ChiefFlagg stated that was now. Fay Biles inquired as to what the salary was would go to. Jorge Aguilera slated he didn't think the entry level would change from what he understood Lt. Orlv Stohs inquired if that was $7.69 for an EMT? Chief Flagg slated a Paramedic Fay Biles inquired as to tire latesl on the Isles t~t' Capri? Chief Flagg stated in terms t;f Isles of Capri. certainly iF not one maybe more of the board members would like to focus on medicine and leave tire to the lire districts. East Naples Fire District is going to present a proposal to provide lire service on Isles of Capri and that ~vill be presented to thc Board and it's their decision as to what they will do. The next step is East Naples Fire District will present the proposal to the Isles of Capri Adviso~ Board, and that will be presented Io the Board of County Commissioners. h is uhimately the Boards decision. Ga~ Young asked what would happen to the people who work lbr the Isles of Capri? ChiefFlagg stated those were all things that would be worked out in the contract. They are certified firefighters. Chief Flagg also stated Chief Schank presented a proposal to his Fire Co~nmission and his Fire Commission approved the proposal. Faye Biles stated some ofthe residents of Isles of Capri also belong to Marco Island Taxpayers Association, and they don't agree with the Isles Adviso~ Committee they don't want East Naples to step in. Faye Biles inquired about Ochopee Fire. Chief Flagg stated she was asked to prepare a presentation to look at creating an Independent District ~br Ochopee and Isles of Capri. Fare Biles asked if it wasn't cheaper to go through the County than to create an Independent District'? Chief Flagg stated cost was one consideration, hut again that will be up to thc County Commissioners I~aul Gunther-Mohr inquired as to the situation on Marco now? Fay Biles staled tire Fire District is no longer. Tile special district was dissolved when it became a City. They now work tbr the City. What happen with tile Union, when the Incorporation went through. somebody approved the Union contract, no one knew about it. It had to be appealed in thirty days, no one knew about it. So it has gone through Tile City wants to dissolve the Union. Paul Gunther-Mohr stated he heard something about Marco having its own EMS. He wanted to know if that was a possibility? Chief Flagg stated she did not read that article. In terms of an EMS system there is a state law that tile Board of ('ounty Commissioners have to issue a Certificate of Need bcfi~re anyone can have an EMS system. The Board at this point has been ',,'cry firm that they want a single consistent approach to emergency medicine in the municipality which includes the City of Naples aad tile City of Marco, and thc balance of Collier Cot,nty. Because of that Florida Statute there can be no otimr EgIS system unless the Board of County Commissioners approve of one, NEW BUSINESS: Chief Flagg infi~rmed file Advisory. Board of tile Automatic Exlernal Defibrillator (AED) Program. The department will be kicking off a public access program that will make it easier for Jobn Q. l'ublic then what the state law requires. In terms of state law they took the AED and moved them under "Good Samaritan Act", but because tile ,,',,ED is a medical device it requires the prescription of a physician before they can usc it Consequently, throughout the State of Florida, most physicians throughout our state will be unwilling to write a prescription What we are going to do throughout Collier Coutlty is lo implement a public access program where we take reliability and responsibility so they don't have to worry about a prescription. We will completely remove all tile barriers in getting the AED out to tile community and provide tile training to them and seek to place the AED on law enforcement vehicles, fitness centers, condominium's, areas of large gatherings, areas that arc difficult lo access with emergency vehicles This will be tile first system in tim nation to have a program like this. We are working on a national level mi design tier this program for the community. The manufacturers are coming to us and are donating fifty AED's. The AED's cost generally from $2500 To $5000 a piece, and they are willing to donate this for tile Public Access Program. Faye Biles inquired if we will be able to receive publicity on this program ('hicf Flagg stated xvt are itl tile final stages of covering tile distributing tile AED's, we arc waiting on it to come from the County ,,\ttornevs ott]ce. It should prove to be an outstanding program. We implemented the AED program twelve years ago with the fire departments, but that is not where they belong due to EMS & tire units generally arriving at tile same time. They need to accessible to tile punic so as soon as the cardiac event occurs, John Q. Public has it accessible tbr initial treatment. Roger Evans brought up tile sect,rity issue in tile Health Building tte stilted with the confidentiality of the EMS Department he t~lt the Adviso~ Council should he intbrmcd Something that is being considered, hopctiflly it xvill survive the budgctao' cllbrl next budget session is thc card system This system is in place in Building "F" Thc Advisor' Board could help with this issue with a statement of concern at thc next budget session Along this same line Rhona Saunders inlbrmcd thc committee members ora Symposium on How to Reduce ('rime in Collier County. The Speakers will be Chief Rambosk City of Naples Police and Emergency Services and Collier County Sheriff Dm~ Hunter It i~ being presented by the Naples Press Club to be hckt on Fcbrua~, 17. 1~98 - 7 ~)(~ Io {)00 P M at thc Tcldbrd Building, Naples Community Hospital. Lt. Orly Stolts stated he appreciated tile opportunity to be a part of tile group and was very appreciated lbr tile opportunity to work with tile medics or'Collier County. Gall Dolan wanted everyone Io know the new emergency roonl tit Naples Community Hospital is now open and invited everyone to stop by, Chief Flagg advised thc Emergency Management Dcpartmcnt became a pan of thc Emergency Services Department as of January I. 1998. They wcrc previously a part of the Risk Management Department. Jcl'f Page reported on the Community Emergency Service Response Team (CERT). This is a group of public safety professionals such as, SheriWs Office, EMS, Fire, & Emergency Management that will be educating community members how to take care of themselves and their neighbors, in standard first aid, ibr several hours while waiting for prot'cssional help in the event of a hurricane, tornado, explosion, etc. Chief Flagg informed the committee of the S.A.L.T., Seniors and Law Enforcement Together, Council. This a group that was started by the Sheriff's Office and they inOuded EMS, and will institute the "File of Life'. This is a file that can be placed on a refrigerator and will include medical and personal information to be used by all public safety personnel. Fay Biles made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Paul Gunther-Mohr. Meeting adjourned. o~ectfully submitte~.--~ 16Gl ': ENVIROMENTAL POLICY TECHNICAL ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA DATE: February 9, 1998 PLACE: Collier County Government Complex Health and Community Services Building 2nd Floor, Room 216 TIME: 4:00 p.m. I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER II. ROLl, CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - January 12., 1997 IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS V. OLD BUSINESS a. Annual Report VI. STANDING COMMITTEES A. COMMITTEE REPORTS (1) Steering Committee - Bill McKinney (2) Resource Committee - Mike Simonik (3) Growth Management - Mike Delate B. SPECIAL PROJECT COMMITTEE REPORTS (1) NR.D Budget-Bill McKinney VII. NEW BUSINESS ~,~e:~_.9¢_.~_/~ /c5 a. Area of Critical State Concern '~"~': b. Miller Boulevard c. Membership Application VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT Norris IX. ADJOURNMENT Hancock Constant the Nac 'Klo Berry Golden G; te Be u titJc;ttion Adviso£v Committee Minutes - Meeting of December 9, 1997 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS & MOTIONS 3. Minutes to the meeting of November 12. 1997: Corrections - 4C - change word base to bonnet; 6B, second paragraph - change second sentence to read Mike recommended extending the services to Route 75 Mark Houghton made a motion to accept the minutes as amended: seconded by Bonnet Bacon and carried unanimously. 6. TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES C After further discussion. Chuck McMahon made a motion authorizing up to a maximum of ten additional services to maintain the arterial and collector roadway medians as per the quoted cost dated November 12. 1997 by Commercial Land Maintenance, to be performed on an as- needed basis; seconded by Mark Houghton and carried unanimously D. Steve had E.B. Simmonds check the lights at the C.R. 951 sign and they quoted a cost of $735 for material and labor to repair the lights and move them closer to the sign. To replace and relocate the lights. it would cost $1670. After some discussion. Mark Houghton made a motion to repair and relocate the lights-as per Option A es quoted by E.B. Simmonds at a cost of $735: seconded by Bonnet Bacon and carried unanimously. · - ]6 1 Golden G~te Beautificwtion Ad~,iso£~, Committee Agenda - Meeting of January 13, 1998 1. Meeting called to order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of December 9. 1997 4. Landscape Maintenance Report - Chuck Buckley 5. Landscape Architect's Report - Mike Mcgee 6. Transportation Administration Services Report A. Steve Fabiano B. Val Prince 7. Committee Members' Reports 8. Old Business 9. New Business 10. Public Comments 11. Adjournment Next Meeting: February 10, 1998, 4:00 p.m. @ Golden ~fn Cnmm,,nifu C~nf~r III II IIIII IIII I II IIIII I 16 1 Go/den Gate Beautit]cation Adviso Corem~tree Minutes - Meeting of December 9, 1997 1. Meeting called to order at 4:05 p.m. at the Golden Gate Community Center. 2. Roll Call Present: Cheryle Newman. Bonner Bacon, Mark Houghton. Charles McMahon (4:35), Sabina Musci (4:50) members: Val Prince and Steve Fabiano, Transportation Administrative Services: Mike McGee. McGee & Associates; Chuck Buckley, Commercial Land Maintenance; Jacqueline Silano, secretary. 3. Minutes to the meeting of November 12, 1997: Corrections - 4C - char;ge word base to bonnet; 6B, second paragraph - change second sentence to read Mike recommended extending the se¢¥/'ces to Route 75 .... Mark Houghton made a motion to accept the minutes as amended; seconded by Bonner Bacon and carried unanimously. 4. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT A. Chuck Buckley advised that red and white begonias were planted on November 21; fertilizer and herbicide have been applied; there are no irrigation problems: the Christmas ornaments were installed: canopy tree pruning has begun as per the contract specifications: he has also pruned the palms. 5. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT A. Mike McGee requested that Mr. Buckley check on the new plants for missing and dead ones and to fill in with lirope. 6. TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES A. Copies of the budget status through November, 1997 were distributed and reviewed. Steve Fabiano also provided copies of a breakdown regarding the funding (funds 136 and 104). B. Steve also noted that the additional services for Commercial Land Maintenance that was discussed last month will require a bid if it exceeds $25,000. There was a lengthy discussion regarding funding and the number of services that can be afforded. Val Prince provided copies of a memorandum from Mark Burtchin, District Supervisor of Road and Bridge, which says that the area is mowed at a cost of $8.50 per acre per cut and that the services are performed eight times per year. Mike McGee estimated this to be about $25.50 per mile (3 acres per mile). Since the memo made no sense to anyone at the meeting. Mark Houghton will send a letter to Dave Bobanick, Transportation Director, requesting an accurate analysis of the total costs per mile for mowing the road shoulders, medians and trash pick up. C. After further discussion, Chuck McMahon made a motion authorizing up to a maximum of ten additional services to maintain the arterial and collector roadway medians as per the quoted cost dated November 12. 1997 by Commercial Land Maintenance, to be performed on an as- needed basis: seconded by Mark Houghton and carried unanimously. D. Steve had E.B. Simmonds check the lights at the C,R. 951 sign and they quoted a cost of $735 for material and labor to repair the lights and move them closer to the sign. To replace and relocate the lights. it would cost $1670, After some discussion, Mark Houghton made a motion to repair and relocate the lights as per Option A as quoted by E.B. Simmonds at a cost of $735; seconded by Bonner Bacon ~:nd carried unanimously. E. Mr. Fabiano provided draft copies of an Executive Summary regarding the Arterial Roadway Landscape Improvement Funding Partnership with the Golden Gate Beautification MST. U, for C.R. 951. A copy was also provided to Dave Bobanick two weeks ago for his review. A discussion ensued regarding the fiscal impact which will be contingent on the availability of funds in Fund 313. Val Prince reviewed the recommendation shown on page 3. Cheryle Newman will meet with Commissioner Constantine to discuss further. F. As a contingency plan, Val Prince is preparing a draft regarding amendments to the Collier County Streetscape Master Plan to include Part B of C.R. 951 for fiscal year 1998/99. 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Mike McGee. Joe Delate and Bonner Bacon met with M~ke Whittenberg and Russ Muller and other participants of the ISTEA Rural Safety Refuge grant to discuss the pilot programs. Mike McGee presented an alternate design layout and cost estimates. Waste Management agreed to purchase all the receptacles and pick up waste. A member of the School Board Transportation Department was also present and advised that since students are picked up on both sides of the road, they did not want a facility built that would draw children across the street. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. The next meeting will be held at 4:00 p.m. on January 13. 1998 at the Golden Gate Community Center. . 16Gl Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee Minutes - Meeting of December 12, 1997 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS & MOTIONS: 4. Minutes of November 14, 1997: Bob Cole moved to accept the minutes as presented; seconded by Al LePain and carried unanimously. 5. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT B. The spray schedule of Top Notch Pest Control, the subcontractor for Advanced Lawn and Landscaping. was reviewed. Additional herbicide applications should resolve all the weed problems in the medians After some discussion, Bob Cole made a motion authorizing an increase to the Advanced Lawn and Landscaping by $1126 for additional fertilizing and spray services; seconded by Al LePain and carried unanimously. 6. TRANPORTATION SERVICES REPORT A. Copies of the Budget Status for the period ending November 30 were distributed and reviewed. After some discussion. Bob Cole made a motion authorizing county staff to prepare an executive summary to the Board requesting the recognition of Reserves for Capital OuUay (#993000) in the amount of $31,700 and to appropriate $18,500 for the following improvements: $6.500 for landscaping and irrigation at the U.S. 41 entrance $10,000 for sleeves and pipe needed for the effluent connection $2,000 for repair or replacement and labor for lighting at Doral The motion was seconded by Al LePain and carried unanimously. 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS B. There was some discussion regarding the mundane appearance of the thriallis in the medians. George Pearson remarked that the Marco Island medians with dwarf Almanda was very appealing to the eye and suggested replacement of the thriallis with Alamanda After a brief discussion. Bob Cole made a motion authorizing the replacement of the thriallis with Alamanda; seconded by Al LePain and carried unanimously. fAi.:c. C0rres: Hancock Constantine Mac'Kte . . 16G1 ', '. Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee Agenda - Meeting of January 9, 1998 1. Meeting called to order 2. Attendance 3, Approval of minutes of December 12. 1997 4. Reports A. Advanced Lawn & Landscape - Spraying for dollar weed: watering new sod - verify dates B. Transportation Administrative Services C. New Construction i. Mike McGee, McGee & Associa[es D. Committee Members i. George Pearson ii. Al LePain iii. Robert Cole iv. Robert Weyers 5. Old Business 6. New Business 7. Adjournment NEXT MEETING: February 13, 1998 Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee Minutes- Meeting of December I2, 1997 1. Meeting called to order at 4:0,.5 p.m. 2. Location - Facilities Management. Conference Room 111. 3. Attendance Taken - Present: George Pearson, Al LePain, Robert Cole. members; Steve Fabiano, Transportation Administrative Services: Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; ,Jeff Koetting. Advanced Lawn and Landscaping; Jacqueline Silano, secretary. Excused: Robert Weyers. member. 4. Minutes of November 14, 1997: Bob Cole moved to accept the minutes as presented; seconded by Al LePain and carried unanimously. 5. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT A With the exception of the cul de sacs. the mulch has been installed: the sod has been replaced and extra watering will be applied as needed. Mike McGee recommended plugging the areas that need sod on Valley Stream Circle and elsewhere. George Pearson noted that there is a lot of dollar weed on Pebble Beach Boulevard. B. The spray schedule of Top Notch Pest Control. the subcontractor for Advanced Lawn and Landscaping. was reviewed. Additional herbicide applications should resolve all the weed problems in the medians. After some discussion, Bob Cole made a motion authorizing an increase to the Advanced Lawn and Landscaping by $1126 for additional fertilizing and spray services; seconded by Al LePain and carried unanimously. C. Since the median near the Lely Presbyterian Church accumulates debris in the crosswalk, the committee instructed Advanced Lawn and Landscaping to install concrete blocks (18" x 4" x 2") to help retain the debris. D. Steve Fabiano and Mike McGee both expressed their disappointment in the conditions of the medians, especially the weeds and trash. The valve boxes have not been cleaned and checks for irrigation leaks have not been routinely performed as per the contract. Mike felt that Advanced Lawn and Landscaping were not paying attention to the details. 6. TRANPORTATION SERVICES REPORT A. Copies of the Budget Status for the period ending November 30 were d~stributed and reviewed, After some discussion. Bob Cole made a motion authorizing county staff to prepare an executive summary to the Board requesting the recognition of Reserves for Capital Outlay (#993000) in the amount of $31,700 and to appropriate $18,500 for the following improvements: $6,500 for landscaping and irrigation at the U.S. 41 entrance $10,000 for sleeves and pipe needed for the effluent connection $2,000 for repair or replacement and labor for lighting at Doral The motion was seconded by Al LePain and carried unanimously. B. Steve reported lhat he has requested information from the Utilities Department regarding the jack and bore work that will be required for the affluent line. The Utilities Department still owes $2800 for damages they incurred. Steve will follow up again and will contact Ed llschner. Public Works Administrator, if necessary. George Pearson will call Mr. Clemmons to be sure that he's aware of the situation. 7 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT Mike McGee had nothing further to report 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS A. There was some discussion regarding the repair or replacement of the sign and monument at the U.S, 41 entrance, Bob Cole will meet with the Civic Association to discuss sharing the cost. B, There was some discussion regarding the mundane appearance of the thriallis in the medians. George Pearson remarked that the Marco Island medians with dwarf Almanda was very appealing to the eye and suggested replacement of the thriallis with Alamanda After a brief discussion, Bob Cole made a motion authorizing the replacement of the thriallis with Alamanda: seconded by Al LePain and carried unanimously. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 5:15 The next meeting has been scheduled for January 9. 1998. at 4:00 p.m. Facilities Management, Conference Room 111. GOLDEN GATE ESTATES LAND TRUST COMMITTEE MONDAY, AUGUST 25, 1997 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANClt LIBRARY Matthew 'Matt' Hudson -Chairman M. Joann Sandy -Vice-Chairman Charles 'Skip' Van Gelder -Member L. Jeanne Jourdan -Member Stephen Greenberg ,Member Sandra Taylor -Director, Real Property Management Department Linda St0evich -Secretary, Real Property Management Department Chief Frank Kovarik -Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District Michael Whittenberg -President, Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association Karen Acquard -Golden Gate Estates Res/dent & Committee Applicant Distributions: Memorandum, dated August 25, 1997, to Sandra Taylor from Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant, Board of'County Cmmnissioners, forwarding resumes ofKaren Acquard and L/Il/an Jeanne Jour~an for consideration for current vacancy on the Committee. I CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Matthew Hudson, Chairman. Il APPROVAL OF MINUTES, June 23, 1997. Skip ~nade a motion to approve the minutes as drafted. Jeanne seconded the motion and the minutes were so approved. Misc. C0rres: 4ancoc~ ~ Date: ,;ac '~ ~ Item~ ' ' Cop~es III APPROVAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT Skip made a ;notion to approve the TreasureKs Report as of July 31, 1997. Jeanne seconded the motion. All were iii favor. Skip com,nented that he was unaware ora land sale. Sandy said sales are not individually presented to the Committee. She added the Committee can expect to see a few additional sales in the next few months. The Revenues generated would be shown on the next Treasurer's Report. VI REQUEST FOR FUNDS Chief Frank Kovarik, Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District, pre:-:ented to the Cmnmittee a request for fimds totaling $28,448.89 to purchase new fire apparatus to service the Golden Gate Estates area and as mutual aid to other areas. He also stated the stat/on would like to update some of the equipment to better serve the citizens and safety for the firefighters. Chief Kovarik discussed a hand-out previously mailed to members describing the equipment needed and bid prices. Steve stated the prices were about right because he is in the same 'field'. Skip was questioning the high price for a track engine. Chief Kovarik explained it was the lowest estimate and wanted a product with less constant repair. Sandy inquired as to whether she may mail the agreement to the committee members for approval. Ail members acknowledged that was acceptable iii lieu of having a special meeting called next month. In response to Matt's question, Chief Kovarik stated the eqt, ipment will be hot, sed at the main stat/on. Matt was in favor and ~notioned to grant Chief Kovarik's request if lowest prices are used. Joann seconded the motion. All were in favor. V 56 ACRE COMMUNITY PARK UPDATE Sandy summarized tile response received from the County's Director of Parks & Recreation. Joann questioned the difference between a community park, neighborhood park and regional park. The Committee commented that the Board of County Commissioners' prior COmlnitment was to construct a community park ill the Estates area utilizing the 56 acres iii addition to Max A. Hasse Community Park. Matt stated if the County does not use the 56 acres, maybe the Committee should advert/se the site for sale. Sandy suggested to invite Mafia Ramsey, Parks & Recreation Director and/or Tom OIl/IT, Public Services Administrator to the next meeting for questions and answers. V! ADVISORY COMMITTEE VACANCY There were two applicants for lhe current vacancy on tile Committee. Jeanne Jourdan, who is a current member, and Karen Acquard, a Golden Gate Estates resident. Both were present and interviewed in the meeting. Jerome Jourdan and Karcn Acquard left the room while the remaining Committee discussed the applicants. The Committee all favored to re-appoint Jeanne because of her property background working in the Tax Appraiser's office and current good job on tile Conunittee. The applicants were brought back itl and Matt motioned to re-appoint Jeanne Jourdan to tile committee. Skip seconded the motion. All were in favor. VII I'RO,IECT UPDATES Mike Whittenberg, a sergeant with tile Shcritt's Dcpartnmnt and President of Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association, distributed inforlnation on "Rural Safety Refilge". The project addresses shelters for children waiting for a school bus in rural areas. The structure consists of all overhead shelter, bench, bike rack, and a garbage can. They can also be used as a recreation shelter for walkers, bikers and horse riders. Mr. Whittenberg explained the shelters would be placed where there are currently no sidewalks, a lot of kids, and road ways fha! provide for 45 mph traffic. Mr. Whittcnberg has presented the project to other agencies and ali were st:.pportive. Tile school board's response was somewhat apprehensive. Matt commented that it xvould be difficult to decide on what corner tile shelter should be placed. Sandy questioned whether the 1983 Agreement would allow such a use. Matt concurred with Sandy that a letter be written to Avatar relating to the safety shelter project and whether fimds fi'om tile GAC Land Trust could be used for this project prior to the Committee members' recommending any tinancial support. VIII NEXT MEETING DATE The Committee tentatively xvere all ill favor of the next meeting October 27, 1997 at 7:00 PM. Skip stated he could not attend this meeting. Matt read Joann Sandy's letter of resignation dated August 31, 1997. IX ADJOURNMENT Skip made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:00 PM. Steve seconded tile motion and the meeting was adjourned. GOLDEN GATE ESTATES LAND TRUST COMMITTEE MONDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1997 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH LIBRARY L. Jeanne Jourdan - Member Stephen Greenberg - Member Sandra Taylor - Director, Real Property Management Depadment Judith Kraycik - Secretary, Real Property Management Depadment Steve McDonald - Golden Gate Estates Resident Janet Mellersten - Golden Gate Estates Resident ';~s: Karen Acquard - Golden Gate Estates Resident ., I. CALL TO ORDER ~ ' ' The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Stephen Greenberg, Member,: in the absence of the Chairman. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES, August 25, 1997 This meeting did not have a quorum of members which is required in order to take a vote. Therefore, approval of the minutes was not addressed. III. TREASURER'S REPORT Sandy reported the ending cash balance as of September 30, 1997, was $280,177.11 and the available cash balance was $279,z170.10. Approval of the Treasurer's Repod was postponed until the next meeting. IV. PROJECT UPDATES: Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District Sandy stated the Agreement was approved by the Board of County Commissioners, a fully executed copy of which was forwarded to the members with the agenda. The expiration date of this agreement is six months from the date of execution. Sandy added she has not yet received any invoices for this project. V. 56 ACRE COMMUNITY PARK UPDATE - COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE Sandy asked if she.should invite Maria Ramsey to the next meeting. Steve thought that was a good ide .~.ever, he hopes that the other members will be present. Matt is Norris -- t/ ~erry ~ I II I I IIIIIIII I more knowledgeable about this project than the rest of the Committee. Jahet suggested contacting the Committee members who served when this project was initiated. Sandy said she may be able to provide some minutes or Executive Summaries from that time addressing the park. Jeanne asked where the 56 acre site is located. Sandy answered it is near Orangetree. Steve said referring to past documentation is the only way to find out the facts. Sandy said even if everything is documented as to the intent at the time the site was reserved, it may not matter because of current land development codes and growth management plans. The focus of the BCC is to construct regional parks and neighborhood parks are to be funded by the neighboring residents. Sandy said there is nothing that says the site must be a park. She added that in correspondence recently received from Maria Ramsey it is stated that the site is being considered for a passive park with picnic areas and possibly a disc golf course. VI. RURAL SAFETY REFUGE STRUCTURES Sandy said a response to her previous correspondence was received from Avatar supporting the construction of the shelters. A copy of this letter was mailed with the agenda. Therefore, should Mike Wittenberg return to the Committee with a request for funds, the Committee is free to make a recommendation. Steve asked if there would be any other legal requirements, other than an official 'letter of no objection' from Avatar, that are necessary prior to a recommendation to go forward with this project. Sandy responded approval by the Board of County Commissioners. A resident inquired as to the most recent developments with this project. Steve stated Mike Wittenberg, who attended the August meeting, is seeking funding for a few 'test' shelters in selected areas. As a result, the Committee requested Avatar be contacted to inquire whether they would support this project. Janet Mellersten inquired whether there would be a shelter at the end of every street. If not, there will be the potential of dissatisfaction among the Golden Gate Estates residents due to the fact that elementary school students cannot cross streets and therefore, may not be able to use the shelter. Steve said these concerns are being addressed. However, the structures will be multipurpose, also serving as rest stations for bikers. Currently, the big problem is where to locate them and where to locate the first ones. Karen Acquard, a resident, stated it would be nice to have them at every intersection. However, due to the cost. the structures will need to be spaced. Steve stated the estimated cost of each structure is $4,700. Janet suggested contacting contractors and suppliers in the Estates. Steve said that Mike is seeking donations. Karen added Mike is also looking into which intersections have the most troublesome congregation of students (i.e. largest group, too close to road). She said it is also hoped the structures will help improve the litter situation in the Estates and cut down bicycle thefts. ~ llllllll II IIIIIIIII I III I I I I IIII IIII IIII'~ ' ....... I VII. ADVISORY COMMITTEE VACANCY Sandy stated no qualified applications have been received thus far for the vacancy. Janet asked which phases are available. Sandy said Phase I is full (three members), so a new member could reside in any of the other Phases. VIII. NEXT PROPOSED MEETING DATE - Monday, December 22, 1997 Monday January 26, 1998 Sandy said the only issue that may need to be addressed prior to January wculd be to choose a new member to fill the vacancy should she receive applications. In ;nat case, she can call a special meeting. Janet asked if a special meeting would be publicized. Sandy said it would. Steve said the December date is rather close to Christmas should anyone have plans. Sandy suggested scheduling the January meeting now and calling a special meeting sometime in the interim depending upon when resumes are received. Steve agreed that was a good idea. Janet inquired whether the Committee would consider returning to a monthly schedule. Steve and Sandy both stated the current agendas are quite short and the meetings are presently conducted every other month. Steve asked Janet if she was aware that Big Corkscrew is getting a new fire engine and the additional equipment needed 'is being funded by the Golden Gate Estates Land Trust. Janet asked the cost. Sandy responded approximately $28,448.89. Janet then asked for a total amount of money donated to Big Corkscrew since the creation of the Fund. Sandy said, excluding the current Agreement, a total of $243,500 has been given to Big Corkscrew. She added $190,00 has been given to the Golden Gate Fire and Rescue District, $416,400 to the Board of County Commissioners, and $166,500 to the Sheriff's Office. Steve asked if the money that was given to the Board was used for the park. Sandy answered that is was used for the park as well as EMS, the library, Ochopee, and fire hydrants. The next scheduled meeting is set for Monday, January 26, 1998, at 7:00 P.M. at the Library. IX. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:21 P.M. . ' 16Gl ' ' AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION BOARD WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1998, IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION/Collier COUNTY GOVERNMENT, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, MEETING ROOM "E" NAPLES FLORIDA: NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, .~ND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE HAPB WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. 1. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 16, 1997 3. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT: A. National Trust Workshop 4. OLD BUSINESS: A. Historic Designation of the Morris Property Archaeological Site (Result of BCC Hearing} B. H. Nehrling's Tropical Gardens and Arboretum 5. NEW BUSINESS: A. Amy Taylor B. Survey and Assessment Waiver 6. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 7. ADJOURN HISTORICAL AGENDA/md , {' .. ,'.nst~nt the '< , _ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMML'NITY DEVELOPMENT AND 2800 NORTII HORSESItOE DRIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION NAPLES. FI.OIIlDA 34104 January 28, 1998 Ms. Christina Eggers CLG Coordinator Bureau of Historic Preservation R,A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 RE: Collier Count}' Preservation Board Meeting Dear Ms. Eggers: This letter is to intbrm you that the Collier County Historic and Archaeological Preservation Board held a public hem'ing on Friday, January 16, 1998. I have enclosed a copy of the minutes for your review and records. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me at: 941-403-2463. Very truly yours Principal Planner (CLG Coordinator) Ifistoric Prcscrvation/RVB/rb cc: Vincent A. Cautcro Sue Filson Robert Mulhcrc Ron Jamro Nancy Sicmion Preservation Board Building Review & Permitting ~9411 403-2400 Natural Resources 19.111 732-2505 ('ode Enforcement 1941 } 403-2440 Planning Scm'ices ~941 } 40:1-2:100 thmsing & Urban hnprovement ~ 941 ~ 403.2330 Pollution Control (941 ) 7:1'2-'250'2 MtNUTE;S COLLII~P. COUNTY t-IISTOP. ICAL 8-, APCblAF=OLOGICAI_ PP.I~SE-iRVATIOIXl BOAP. D l'.loet,.~ of J .... ,,~, ,o D.k~.k,J .... Co, ADDENDA TO A~NDA APPROVAL O~ NINU'T'~g PLANNING S~RVtC~S D~PARTH~NT R~PORT. I~,S ~S,~,On p~'~n~ ~0 tie ne,t mPet*n~ OLD Tk,...,Il .ho ~ ~.~k~ ~ tk. ~ ,. atte.~a.ce '[he ~ ~.kI,c,t4 [~ the P~at,o- ~J ..,tl ~ .... ate DI~CUgglON O~/; DDENDA mn{et,e~te~ .... t~ ~e~mt,on p~lec~ c,~ nee~e~ N~XT HE~TING ~b ....., ~ ,ooa ~ o oo A kl (Co4.~.~. ~ ~ ~1 I I _ I III I I IIIIII I I II I IIII III II III II I IIII III .... ' ................. I IMMOKALEE BEAUIIFICATION M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMIIIEE SUMMARY OF RECO~E~ATIONS A~ MOTIONS 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 19TM MEETING: The follo~ng co~ections were made - 5B, Change lhe end ot'lhe fir~ ~nlcn~ lo rc~d "!~e noted the ~melcw has.fimr lr~s that n~ Io be remove"; delete '~l~qn up costs were cstimat~ at $2.14 in addition ~o the cost tbr remo~5ng lhe tree", Rila Avalos mov~ to ac~pt lhe minutes as amended; ~nd~ by Deni~ Smith and ~qffi~ unanimously Hancock '/ " ' Constantine x Collier Counly Government Center · 3301 Tamiami Trail. i~ast · Naples. Florida 33q62 · IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMITTEE . genha - ebruarl 1 g. I. C~I to ordcr 2 Attcndan~: l)cni~ Smith, Committ~ Chair Rita Avalos, Committ~ Member/Past Chair Dor~s tlow~d, Commiltcc Mcm~r Che~'le Thom~, Committ~ Member V~ Pfin~, T~spo~ation Admin. Se~'ices J~ ~lat~ Offi~ ot'Capit~ Pro]~ts M~agement Mike McG~, ~d~ape Archit~t Chuck Buckley, lmnd~pe M~ntenan~ Contractor 3 Welcom~nlroduction of Guests 4. Approval of Minutes ~om Janua~' 21, 1998 5. Budget Update 6. Maintenance Report - CR 846 & SR 29: Chuck Buckley 7. Office orCapital Proj~ts Management Repo~ - Joe Delate 8. Old Business: A. B. C 9. Transpo~ation Administration Repo~Update I 0. New Business I I. Open dimussion on any business not n~ing Committc~ approval 12 Adjournment Next Meeting: March 18, 1998 - 5:00 pm. Ch,. lmmokalee Community Center Collier County C.}ovcmmcnt Center · 331)1 Tamiami Trail. East · Naple~. Fl,~rida 16Gl '' IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMITTEE /tleet n nf anuar 2.1, 1 I. The Immokalee Lighting and Beautification District Advisory Committee Meeting of Wednesday, January 21, 1998 ,,vas called to order at 5:05 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Members present were Denise Smith, Kita Avalos, and Dorcas Howard, members. Also Present: Chuck Buckley, Commercial Land Maintenance; Val Prince, Transportation Administrative Services; Joe Delate, Office of Capital Projects Management; Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Jacqueline Silano, recording secretary. Excused Absence: Cherryle Thomas, member. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 19TM MEETING: The fbllowing correc:ions '.,,'ere made-- 5B. Change the end of the first sentence to read "he noted the cemete]y i:,~,.fimr trees that need to be removed"; delete "Clean Up costs were estimated at $234 in addition to the cost for removing the tree". Rita Avalos moved to accept the minutes as amended; second~ by Denise Smith and carried unanimously. · I. BUDGET Lq~DATE A. VOl Prince advised the committee ofSteve Fabiano's res/~tmation and distributed copi~.x; ora mcmo from him. B. VOl advised that a new purchase order for S 1 !.250 for the five fix-tures from Lumac Fas been issued~ E.B. Simmonds ,.,,'ill install them. C. Copies of the budget status report for the period ending December . IC~7 were distributed and discussed. Vol advised that the carry fom'ard should be refle?,ed in the March. statement. 5. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT A. Chuck Buckley advised that the turf was sprayed with fiangicide and insecticide on December 19; 44 juniper and 56 liriope were installed. B. Chuck noted that three light fixtures were down due to accidents rind pro~,ided two of the accident reports. C. Chuck will take down the Christmas bmmers next week. D. There was some discussion regarding the maintenance of the cemetery' and the north 200' of 9m Street. It was decided that this would be done on an "as needed" basis. 6. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT A. Mike McGee distributed copies of the December quarterly report; there was a brief discussion. B. Mike expressed his concern about the removal of the sand in the medians. He cautioned that the weekly sweeping ma), need to be increased during .the dry season. Collier County Government Center · .~301 Tamiami Trail. East · Naples. Florida ~,96, 16Gl C. Mike and Val discu:;sed thc update o£d~e maintenance specifications thc ccmcteD, will be included in n~xt year's bid. The committee ix'i.~ to .June will review a draft ot'thc specifications. 7. OI:FICI~ OF CAPITAl. PRO.II~C'I'S MANAGI~MENT RI~POI~T A. Joc Dcla~e distributed copies of a memoramtum rc~ardin~ Iht Immokalcc Slrcctscape Slatus. which rcrercnce(t thc $ 100.000 .I PA li~hling granl. B. ('opic:; of thc l~xecmivc StlIlllll;II%' rcqucstin~ the award of the co::~:'ac~ ('omincnt Electric. Inc. fi~r consl)~clion of tl:c Immokalee Downto,,vn Beautification Prqiect. Phase !1, Sub-Phase A will be distributed xvilh this meeting. ('.There was mine discussion re,ar(ling fimdin~ ot iht t:pcmnm~ pro cci. loan to complete Ibc project ;viii be made it'necessam 8 NEW BUSINESS ,'\. There was di.',;ct;s:;ion r'c~arding ~l~c groum, lbrcal;in~ ceremony fix ~!~c ::cx~ please Denise will coordinmc willl Ibc Main S,'eet group. Invitations will 1,c ~;ent utili;dn~ lt~e sccreladal sca'icc B. Denise rccc:~t!v al~cndcd a mcclin~ ol' the Pathway Prqject grout~ and advised of l~c five areas to prioritize tbr sidewalk construction - Lake Traflb[-d Road extended to Tippins. N 18"' tFom Lake Traflbrd 1o Robots. S 7"' at Ctflorado Io Roberts. N I~ tFom 20u' to Robe, s. and the west side ofS ~a Street. ADJOURNMENT ,.\s lho'e was m) lil~lher business to discuss, the meetin~ ,, a., a(~jo,med ~.~ ~) ~ ' "'" , .D jl Ill The next meeting will be held {m Febma;x, 18. 1997 at 5:00 p.m. al the Conmmnitv ('enter 2 THE LAKE TRAFFORD RESTORATION TASK FORCE MEETING Friday, January 9,1998, 8:30 a.m. AGENDA I. Roll Call. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting. 3. Old Business. A. Accounting of Total In-kind Donations. Frank Morello. B. Progress Report on DEP's Application. C. Progress Report on Turkey and Wild Hog Hunt Auction. 4. New Business. 5. Other. 6. Adjournment. THE LAKE TRAFFORD RESTORATION TASK FORCE MEETING Friday, January 9, 1998, 8:30 AM MINUTES Members Present Frank Uorello Ann Olesky Gall G. Gibson Fred N. Thomas, Jr. Michael Simonik Gene Heam Dr. Eric Flaig Others Present Nicole Ryan, The Conservancy of SW Florida George Yilmaz, ,7,CPC Minutes of Friday, December 5, 1997 Motion made by Annie Olesky and seconded by Gene Heam to accept the minutes from December 5. Minutes were approved unanimously. Old Business Report on In-kind Contributions: A report was given by Frank Uorello on the in-kind contributions. As of today the total is $65,226. Both bureaus of DEP are delinquent in turning in their information and also have not received anything from Ed Carlson. Report on DEP's Application: The muck samples are completed. The work from Big Cypress Basin and the work J~ckie Smith is also done. The only two components left are the private engineering work at the spoil site and the land owner research work that needs to be done. Michael Simonik has agreed to take on this assignment. Gall Gibson will fax over to him the questions pertaining to this assignment. Report on Turkey and Wild Hoq Hunt Auction: The hunt is still being advertised. We have received some of Clyde Butch's work to be used for fund raising. Bid opening was discussed and everyone concurred that they would be opened up on Friday. January 16th at Lake Trafford at 2 p.m. Annie and Fred have agreed to handle the PR. Michael reported that next week was Lake Trafford week and there was several things taking place. The following is a preview of next week's agenda: · Tuesday (Jan. 13) at 12 Noon - Eye on the Issues at the Conservancy [Lunch and lecture. Topic Lake Trafford] · Tuesday (Jan. 13) at 7 p,m. - Friends of Lake Trafford at the Immokalee Community Center. · Wednesday (Jan. 14) at 9 a.m. - Legislative Delegation at the Immokalee Community Center [Discuss Lake Trafford with the 5 or 6 representatives there] · Wednesday (Jan, 14) at 2 p.m.- Legislative Delegation at the Board of County Commissioners Office · Friday (Jan. 16) at 2 p.m. - Bid opening at Lake Trafford. New Business: Discussed E-mail proposal by USGS (George Karavitas) for a project in Lake Trafford that included installation of monitoring platforms on lake, tied to telemetry, automatic aeration devices, and an WWW site. Recognized that monitoring was a plus, but that aeration devices could be viewed as the '~,x" to the lake, but were in fact a band aid. A committee was formed made up of Eric Flaig, Gail Gibson and Clarence Tears. The question raised is, what else can we get funds for?. This committee will work with George and report at the next meeting. Matchinq Funds and Other Resources Frank has identified some funds from Dade County's Restoration Fund. This money is being made available to Dade County at 100% and a cost share to other counties. Frank and Gail are gathering the information necessary and will be submitting it in. They will report at the next meeting. Adjournment & Next Meetinq Meeting was adjourned. Next meeting date set for February 20, 1998 at 8:30 a.m. THE LAKE TRAFFORD RESTORATION TASK FORCE MEETING Friday, May 23,1997, 8:30 a.m. AGENDA :~' 2. Approval of the April 18, 1997 Minutes. 3. Old Business: A. Report on any testing. B. Review & approval of the conceptual plan. C. Update on Corp of Engineers funding. D. Update on re-appointments. 4. New Business. 5. Other. 6. Adjournment. TASK FORCE MEETING Friday, May 23, 1997, 8:30 AM MINUTES Members Present Fred N. Thomas, Jr. Erik Flaig Gall Gibson Annie Olesky Frank Morello Michael Simonik Ski Olesky Others Present George W. Batchelder, Nautilus Dredging & Docks Mitch Murray, US Geological Survey (USGS) Arthur C. Lietz, USGS George A. Karavitis, USGS Paul Midney, Marion E. Feather Medical Center David Lindsay, Immokalee Water & Sewer District Eva Deyo, Immokalee Water & Sewer District There was an introduction of guests. Minutes of Friday~ April 18~ 1997 Motion made by Gall Gibson and seconded by Erik Flaig to accept the mL'~utes fi.om April 18. Members voted unanimously to accept the minutes. Mr. Thomas gave a brief overview on why and how the committee was formed and the progress that has been made. David Lindsay gave a report on an alternative water use grant (spray field) that he applied for and was not able to get approved. It would have provided water to the groves. He indicated that he will be applying for other grants that might be able to provide some match for the task force. Old Business Report on any testing- Frank Morello gave a report on the lake and the recent fish kill. Though it was not as severe as the last one it is still significant as it relates to the quantity and size structure of the fish. Conceptual Plan - The plan was reviewed and discussed. There are several changes that will be made. Gail will be out of the office but he will send the diskette to Fred Thomas and the adjustments will be done. Mr. Thomas will also call Clarence Tears to discuss the plan. The Lake becoming a Game & Fish Management Area - Frank Morello reported that the delay is getting it placed on the consent agenda. Re-appointments - Fred Thomas reported that the task force was reappointed for one year. There was a motion by Annie Olesky and seconded by Gall Gibson that an ordinance be done to continue the task force on an on-going basis. In-Kind Contributions - Frank Morello gave a report. Any expenses incun'ed by any members that allowed them to participate in this project needs to be reported to him. He will provide a status report at future meetings. Site Report - Fred Thomas reported that the landowner for the site we are presently looking at is on a 18-momh clock to get his land prepared. He is willing to work with us. Annie reported that other surrounding landowners have also expressed an interest in accepting the muck. They will be giving the landowners a tour on June 5. George A. Karavitis from US Geological Survey, Dept. of the Interior, gave a presentation on what his agency is all about and informed us on the kinds of information and resources they provide and might be useful to the task force. He also agreed to work cooperatively with the University of Florida and the Water Management District. Meeting was adjourned. 16Gl THE LAKE TRAFFORD RESTORATION TASK FORCE MEETING Friday, September 26,1997, 8:30 a.m. AGENDA 1. Roll Call. 2. Approval of the August 15, 1997 Minutes. 3. Old Business: A. Accounting of total in-kind donations - Frank Morello B. Big Cypress Basin Update. Clarence Tears. C. Report on DEP's application for dredging. D. Status of Funding Initiatives. 4. New Business. A. Interlocal Agreement Between Lake Tmfford Restoration Task Force & Wildlife Foundation. B. Discussion on the Fund-raising Turkey & Wildhog Hunt & Bass Fishing Auction. 5. Other. , 6. Adjournment. LAKE Friday, September 26,1997, 8:30 a.m. MINUTES Members Present: Frank Morello Ann Olesky Ski Olesky Jackie Smith Clayton Mil]er Michael Simonik Ilene Barnett Fred N. Thomas, Jr. Others Present: Susan C. Sullivan Scott A. Eclder Minutes of Friday, August 15~ 1997: Annie Olesky made a motion to approve the minutes of August 15, 1997. Jackie Smith seconded the motion. A vote was taken and passed unanimously. Report on In-kind Contributions: Frank gave the following updated report on the in-kind contributions' Game & Fish 14,624 DEP 2,624 CC 26,000 BCI 5,000 There is still some outstanding items; IFAS Compact study, Jackie Smith's attendance, DEP's inver, study and the meeting in Rocky's office and the work the engineers are doing. Also, the % from Guy Carlton's office that is handling the donations coming in. There will be a visit to the spoil site the 30th September at 3 p.m. with Ken Hummiston, the engineer, who is going to help do the drawings needed for the application. This needs to be included as an in-kind- contribution. Ilene Barnett stated that there would be a working group meeting on that day in Ft. Lauderdale. She will be there. There was mention of getting Skip Bergman of Army Corps. involved with the Task Force. Frank Morello will contact Skip. Big Cypress Basin Update: No report was given. Mr. Thomas did state that the resolution was updated to incorporate Lake Trafford and to be a joint partner with the County to help restore the lake. Report on DEP's Application for Dredging: The meeting at Rocky Scofield's office went well. The will follow up with Ken as previously stated. Things are moving rapidly to get the application back to DEP. Bid was done by specs that BCI did. A Iow bid was received with the collecting samples being done by Game & Fish. There was a total of four bids; one Iow and the other 3 comparable. Each company was sent a letter to recheck their figures to see whether they were comfortable with their bid. Everyone replied with a yes. The bid was awarded to Abraham & Associates. Status of Funding Initiatives: The Dade County MilJgation fund was discussed. Because the fund has a lot of money they are extending it to adjacent counties, not at 100% but at 50%. A package was completed by Gall Gibson and Frank Morello. Fund-raising Turkey & Wildhoq Hunt & Bass Fishing Auction' The Pepper family who own the hunting rights to the Pepper land donated a package to the Task Force to utilize through silent auction. The package includes hunting on the land for Osceola turkey, the use of the cabin for 3 nights, meals in different motifs and a night out at the casino. The value of the whole package is about $2,000. This will be advertised in the sports media (fishing/hunting), major newspapers, outdoor magazines, radio, television and the internet. It will cost $20 to submit a bid. The person can submit as many times as they want. The bid v,'inner will also receive an airboat ride and the necessary licenses need. The process is being run through Game & Fish using the Wild Life Foundation to run the money through. Bids will be received up until January 15th and on the 16 January the bids will be opened and the highest bid will be awarded the prize. There was discussion on having a turkey guide on setting up some committees to hat,die the logistics. The list below shows who will handle certain functions: Transportation - Fred Thomas · Licensees - Rocky Scofleld Food - Need someone Fred will also contact Herman Spooner to find out about insurance to cover the project. Interlocal Agreement Between Lake Trafford Restoration Task Force & Wildlife Foundation: There was discussion on the concerns brought forth by the Wildlife Foundation. Where is the money going if the restorations doesn't happen or if the Task Force dissolves, etc.? Ski Okesky made a motion and seconded by Ilene Bamett that we will prepare a letter to the legal department instructing them to prepare an interlocal agreement that states that all the money is to be given to Lake Trafford and that if Lake Trafford goes then the money is to be funded to Game & Fish to be utilized for Lake Trafford. Lake Watch Pro~l_ ram: There was discussion on getting Lake Trafford moved into this category. Jackie will follow up on this and report at the next meeting. Genesis South Florida: Ms. Sullivan reported that they did receive the letter the task force sent them and they are in the process of getting DEP's approval. Adjournment: Meeting was adjourned. [.AK[ 'I'iL~LFFORD uFSTORAI'ION TASK FORCE SPI~-CIAL .*REgTINC ON ERP AND FI]NOt,NC lr¢lday~ .~ D~eember, 1997, !1:.10 AM M LNI.tT£S Members Present Fr~ 'r~on~-~ A-,,,c Ol~sky Frnnk Momilo C~fl~ J~eam Rock! :5cul'Icld Ed Carlso~ Mi~e Shuonik Gall Gih~n 7¢m' Ku.nz (for (.'larruc~ Tr. ara) Rclate~ lo F.m~ronmcnial Rc..,ourcc P~r~ut (ERP~ Application ;f71c.! :~eet[$ t,n he clcJtl~ yt't lo addrcx.~ qu¢~'tioe1.~cnmmt'nt.~ un both I"Db;P omi Cor£.,t Jacki~ Smith t0 ~xt'orna aquatlc g'lam ~an'cy ~n a AnmC ta pro<Xan~, Jacklc Ken HtmunJlton ~cd.n tO compkte engineering: ~kstgn rot spoi. i Rocky to check on Meet ~hh l~d owner of probable spoil site to make sure his t~rnc t'ram¢ and l~,cncrat[o~ of tni~ncc~n& pla~ .~rt such ~ to not n~d of cni~nocrm& ph~ (Fred tu mt, ct). Need ~mCt~ng tn wmmg Phy.~icn] properties el'or?mc ~ediment have been determined (through Frank's ~orts} Rocky has co~' of rc~. {'or Htmtmtston BCB (C1;~Tton Mi[l~ and ~'¢m.' K.u~lx) ~: completed rm'i~ot~ of maps, crc RocK).' &: Fred ha,,'c copies Who is ~:g[l¢ctlnK ¢omp~:~ed mat~ri~l~ and who will sul,mi! package to Dada ('ountv~ FD£P,~d the Relatc~ to Funding of ~ojc~t Memor;'m~um of I, Jnd~tan~m~ br~v,:¢~ '£a,~ Forc~ ~ Wildl~e Foura~lion of ~qo~d~. I~c, ~archn~ Fu~s hol~ ~ud ma~a~c~cm ~mome~ comribmcd f~m ~'ari~u.,~ ~ource~ Tad: Force unamXaously vmr. xt to accept l,'ml.ma&c o['~ memo ~th minor c~n~s: ~C ;t~m,~ n~ dD~rc ~t]~ ~ ~d lo ~ ~h ~~m o[~y a~at~ inl~r~ and ~n~ to t~e ~ ~ ~ ~oj~t not ~ ta ~mition. F~E lo ~d a~vt thi~ by ne~l m~m~ Mat;bins t'un~ ~d ~ Fun~ ~Tnce l:ed~l fundin~ ~q~r~x 5~ 50 mtttching funds (vilest &~ll~.~ e~r in.km,O. ~e matching funding ~)urcen ncc(I 1o be i~en,fied anti ~ ~trtbuhnns flat/ Big Q~s B~ ~ l~ a~n~, ~ to u~iy to v~ocs ~n~ a~iet (~'ho ~c~ ~¢tcs? P'~ h~ RFP a,,a ~ i~fo~lion to Ai~, BCe n~ te ~nu[y ~ ~tn~tio~ Frank ~llo is ~nt,n$ ~omuon ~un ~isto~. which am ~7 t~3 ~ ~[~on of ~d su~ of a Brant ~o~ lo ~ D~ County ~ncd on i6 hnun~, I~U. F~ ~i; M~ to ~Ac L~L ~'e~ ~ thc Fred ~a~t~ rci~ to Clyde ~[chcr ff~n~ ~. ~¢h~'s ~lan~n~ to T~ozd r~lO~UO~ ~d tO condua ~to~phy ~sh~. infu~ation st 9 J~ua~'~ 19~ m~tln~. F~ ~so ~c~ I~= m ~nr~ng f~ nusmg foe hunt a~ to 'l'as~ F~C ~m~r rc~'~n~ l~,mg of ~hme ~c ~r~nncl who ~s~ ~e~ ~ Io worthy ~ti~. l~c T~ord h~ no pm~n~ wish ~s ~u~. F~ ~ s~ ,~ ~ir~ is a co~cnt of~mc 1~1 of ~un~g ~ ~n of ~tc~ t~ F~ fim~. Lo~lug Io ~n on lff~. i~7. MgislatlVe tmtiativ~ - Frank a~m ~in~ iMt l~ a a ~t~tt~ ~nding ~. ~t n ~onl. R~ky ~d ~ afl lo m~t with Be~ S~ ~ ~ ~nc ~ ~n buil~R ~p~. ~ ~te for ~is A~ses h~mcr m~agem~t ~1 - F~R nord ~at other ~kc rcstomtion ~o~ sm ~ng 6~cia[l)' ~ (LO some 1~I) ~ wirer ~m~gemcnt ~. Why nol ~ ~ T~fford p~ ~e~e ~/dlMs F~erui ~DA fua~ snll in 1~ h is r~e~,zcd ~l ~th ~ many ~ in the firc a~ with i~n~ Ta~ For~ ~m8 ~rent ~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~oj~t. ~ fie Task Fo~ n~ ~o ~5~ co~mum~t~on ~nd ~j~ Irucking p~. Sug~i~ ~ at ~ch m~n~ ~d i~l~ Ihe~ i~s in ~es. W~Id At ~is ~Jnt. mcluai~ in ~ztut~ is o~on ~in~ tho~ not ~t~ on ~ 10 ~nu~ Naples, Florida, December 17, 1997 LET IT BE KNOWN, that the LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD met on this date in regular session at 2:00 p.m. in the Main Library with the following members present: CHAIR: Syd Meilinger VICE-CHAIR: Jaculyn Defing Sabina Musci Doris Lewis Diane Williams I~;li~c. Cortes: ALSO PRESENT: John W. Jones, Library Director Date: ',.~I~:,'."~--~ Mafilyn Matthes, Assistant Library Director / /' Luz Pietfi, Sr. Secretary It0.m# [U?-C-'~ . APPROVAL OF MINUTES Copies To: Mrs. Mcllinger asked for comments or corrections to the minutes of November 24, 1997. There being none, Mrs. Dering moved, seconded by Mrs. Lewis and carried unanimously, that the minutes be approved as submitted. REPORTS OF OFFICERS - None COMMUNICATIONS - None UNFINISHED BUSINESS Mr. Jones reported that the new Marco Island Branch looks very good. Occupancy is expected to be in mid-February. In reference to the Regional Library planning, Mr. Jones reported that the County is now looking at a couple of options in the same general area. Landowners are being contacted. The Board reviewed the nominations submitted for the Library's Employee of the Month. After some discussion, Mrs. Lewis moved, seconded by Mrs. Williams and Hancock Constantine '~/ Mac 'Kle "/ carried unanimously, to select Bonnie Buchholz as Employee of the Month for December 1997. In reference to the lnternet, Mrs. Matthes reported that the patrons are still very much in favor of adding graphics. She handed out sheets with patron's comments on thc Interact issue. NEW BUSINESS Mrs. Mellinger entertained a motion to create a proclamation for Elizabeth (Betsy) Gaw, who is retiring after more than 20 years of service to the Library. Jackie Dering moved, seconded by Doris Lewis and carded unanimously, to create a proclamation in honor of Betsy Gaw. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Mrs. Mellinger, on behalf of the LAB, commended all those staff members who were involved in creating the TOP SHELF SERVICE program for library staff. She asked Mrs. Matthes to provide the L.A.B. members with copies of the program. DIRECTOR'S REPORT - None REPORT OF THE FRIENDS - None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Library Advisory Board, Mrs. Mcllinger declared the meeting adjourned. Time: 2:50 p.m. DIRECTOR'S REPORT December 10, 1997 Marco Island The project continues to drag. It would now appear that late February or early March will be the target date. The positive side is that the facility, park and landscape will be very attractive. Retirements Two long time employees have announced their plans to retire. Betsy Gaw (Estates Branch Librarian) and Jess Nettles (East Naples Librarian). On the same thought, Betsy received her 20 year pin last week at the Commissioner's Meeting. Northern Regional ~ The County has sent inquiries to the owner of approximately 5 acres on the comer of Oaks and Immokalee Rd. I will advise you when a response is received. Staff Training The "Top Shelve Service" training program has begun. The training program and manual was developed in-house, led by Anna Rubin. Six staff members have been trained as group leaders. Merit Raises The first merit raises have been awarded. 16 1 $1,000.00 Category: Anna Rubin, Reference Librarian Rebecca Wilson, Children's Librarian $500.00 Category: Marilyn VanAtta, Technical Services Dept. Tanya Crump, Immokalee Branch Library Sharon Keshock, Technical Services Dept. M~ l.~el;~ I_l~:tl l,~:~ '.ii:i,; ....... : '., : ,1/' Misc. Cortes: Norris -- / Hancock ' -- Date: Con~tant tne-- // -- Copies ~u: ~" - ~II II I Tony Brock - He hoar(! tho i [atq ;.~ i ....... :~- Vlnoe Doerr - Not that he lC4.; ,w,ti ~-. oi . Tony Brock tte sal,1 because o: Vince Doerr - You mean because ,JOri t l'O I Dtl rn i [i,j . and t ne7 8pp~*~Va I ~f t h possibly ~-liiyor Hrllll, , t,~i'i Wi i I ;.,,'.'~ Everglacles City on th~.~ ,..~, . . SalCl he WOtlld c~;,~c~ i;I; '_ Kent (.)rll~r made tho mot 1o~ to at2prove tho t m~mt)ers were relr~stated. There were ~our h<:,,lr{i member:~ prer;ont , s~, $ [ Z i tn[orm,.~t ioI1. f~,.2 ~, i , :,L ,' g I ;.,.- ,;, f~'~'Ir, Af i.'P "' '" . ...... t,.. t [~', -7 .-.,.- . , ', purct]asad, The meeting adgournad at ~:IUt'M C'har' I es Reynold Cha ~ rman i'hge : Pathway Advisory Committee i~tO the Naples [Collier County] Metropolitan Planning Organization Friday February 20, 1@@8 8:00 a.m. Collier County Development Services Center Conference Room E 2800 N Horseshoe Drive ~; u *-en-~a PATHWAY AD~SoRY COMMITTEE 'of the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization FebrUary 20, 1998 8:00 a.m. Collier Coun~ DeVelopment Se~ice~ Center Conference Room ~ ~ 2800 No~h Ho~eshoe Drive Notice: ,~ny persons wishing to speak on any scheduled agenda item mu~t reglxter prior to spealdng. /~ny person desiring to have an item placed on the agenda shall make a request in writing with a description and summarltation of the item to the MPO Bicycle and Pede~trlan Coordinator at least 14 days prior to the date of the next tcheduled meeting of the PAC. ,4n.v person deciding to appeal a decision of the Committee will need a record of the proceedings pertainin7 thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal i~ to be based. 1. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3. OLD BUSINESS A, Final Selection of Projects for 1997-98 Local Funding 4. NEW BUSINESS A. Briefing PAC membership update B. Presentation: Alternative Recommendation for Golden Gate 5. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 6. LITERATURE 7. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA :. ~.. MINUTES -" ' PATHWAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: Friday January 16, 1998 ._ TIME: 8:00 a.m. PLACE: Conference Room E Development Se~ces Bldg. 2800 N Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 PAC MEMBERS MPO STAFF Cher Compton X Jeremy D. Battis George Dondanviile X Ken Heatherington Michael Feldman X Christopher Hagan X Anita L. Jenkins X Theodore P. Litwin X E. Ann Winnie X County Personnel City Personnel Art Dobberstein, School Transportation none Ed Kant, Transportation FDOT Members of the Public John Limbaugh, Dist IMPO Liaison Arnold DeHart, Pine Ridge Mafia Margeson, Quail Roost Jeanne Brooker, Lakewood Charles Cortfight, Lakewood Charles Schultz, Lakewood CALLED TO ORDER: 8:10 a.m. PRESIDING: Chris Hagan, Chair 1. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA Ed Kant of Transportation Services requested that maintenance be added to the agenda as Old Business item 3.B. Request granted. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES No changes. Minutes approved unanimously. i i II II I II IIIIIII IIII I I IIIII I I II I IIIII II IIIII r ..... ii 3. OLD BUSINESS A. Selection of Projects for 1997-98 Local Fundin? Bike,/Ped Coordinator Jeremy Battis explained that he had taken the PAC project recommendations for each &the five county districts and assembled them in a uniform manner. After deleting projects within the newly-incorporated City of Marco Island, the preliminary list or' projects was forwarded to OCPM for feasibility and cost estimates. Battis explained that it had been expected that OCPM liaison Nya~kadau Korti would be present at the PAC meeting to present cost findings. Kant said he had spoken with Korti, and that the scope of the PAC request made it infeasible for Korti to meet this deadline. Kant offered that the PAC could proceed to narrow the list of projects and consider costs later. This advice was followed and the PAC agreed to narrow the list of projects. Battis reiterated that thc project cost estimates will be forwarded to the PAC members soon so that they may come to the February meeting prepared to make a final selection for 1997-98 local funding. Jean Brooker, a resident ofthe Lakewood neighborhood, addressed the PAC on the case for a sidewalk along Lakewood Bird from Davis to Estey. Ms Brooker said that a sidewalk on one side &the street was installed 7-10 years ago and she had been told that the other side was scheduled to be done in 1998. She cited the increase in traffic volume and speed along the road and requested that at minimum the County install a crosswalk at Lakewood and Boca Ciega Maria Margeson, director of Quail Roost subdivision, offered to make the case fo~ a sidewalk along the street, however, it was unclear whether the road was actually County maintained. Kant informed the PAC, he would research the road's ownership prior to final consideration for funding. The PAC proceeded to compile a short list of projects for each district. District 1 - Anne Winnie explained her methodology for selecting candidate projects for funding consideration. After some discussion it was agreed that Boca Ciega should be added to the list. The District ! list was finalized as follows with no. I as the highest priority. ( 1 ) Thomasson Dr (2) Boca Ciega (3) Broward St (4) Roost Rd (5) Lakewood Bird (6) Davis Blvd 16G1, District II - Michael Feldman explained his methodology. At, er some discussion Forest Lakes Blvd was dropped from consideration because it is a private road. The District ii list was finalized as follows with no. 1 being the highest priority. (1) US 41 N (2) Immokalee Rd (3) Eighth St (4) Sixth St (5) 91't Ave (6) Flamevine Dr (7) Palm River Bird (8) Cypress Way E District III - Cher Compton explained her methodology. Atter some discussion Santa Barbara BIvd was eliminated from the list because it been allotted STP funds. The District iii list was finalized as follows with no.. I being the highest priority. (I) 18~' Ct SW (2) Coronado Pku,W (3) Hunter Bird (4) Lucern (5) Airport Rd (6) 20u' Ct SW (7) 23'a Ave SW (8) 50m St SW (9) 19t~ Ave SW (10) 17~h Ave SW ( I 1 ) 51't Ter SW ( ! 2) Davis Blvd District IV - Anita Chapman and George Dondanville explained their methodology. The District IV list was finalized as follows with no. I being the highest priority. (i) Airport Rd (2) Linwood Ave (3) Commercial Dr (4) Pine St (5) Becca Ave (6) Jackson Ave (7) Ridge Dr District V - Theodore Litwin explained his methodology for selecting potential projects. After some discussion White Bird was moved up to no. 2. The District V list was finalized as follows with no. I being the highest priority. ( ! ) Lake Trafford Rd (2) White Bird (3) N 18t~ St (4) S Seventh St (5) N First St (6) S Third St B. Maintenance--Addenda Item Ed Kant of Transportation Services, speaking on behalf of Road and Bridge, began by explaining that Transportation makes up its maintenance schedules, priority lists and directs its work based on what the organization perceives their needs to be. These needs are a response to citizen requests or direction by the County Commission. A list of maintenance projects with dates for completion cannot be furnished, Kant continued. That is, transportation responds to maintenance items as they are requested. This is simply the way it responds owing to the local weather patterns and the backlog of maintenance requests. Transportation cannot set their priorities based on what others believe them to be. Transportation is responsive, and is currently reviewing a list of requests by north Naples resident Dick Sweere. However, Transportation direction comes from the County Administrator. MPO Coordinator Ken Heatherington responded that communication and direction to Transportation through the PAC is healthy, productive and should continue. C. Resignation PAC member Michael Feldman announced that he would be unable to continue on the PAC because of expanding career responsibility. 7. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 8. LITERATURE Noted 9. ADJOURN Meeting adjourned at 10:00 a.m. l~s. MiSO Bicy~d Pcde~rian Coordinalor Reviewed by~\t~--'~Y{x,~Mk~"~ Date: Jan. 16, 1998 K&'fi~. l~estfi~:ringlon, AICP, ~ i~°°rdinator EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Final Selection of Projects for 1997-98 Local Funding (Fund 313) Objective: For the PAC to complete its project selection process by choosing five top projects to be placed out for bidding. Meeting Notes Consideration,: At thc Jannaty meeting thc PAC narrowed its selections to five top priorities for each district. The PAC should now select from among those final 25 candidate projects to arrive at a short list. Cost estimates are now in hand and are attached as "Corres'pondcnce." Staffcost estimates may differ from the actual contractor's bid. In the case that staff estimates are high, it may b~ advisable for the PAC to s~lect more projects than what can be finally budgeted. In the case that the estimates are low, the contractor may proceed to complete as many projecls as the budget will allow. Staff Recommendation: That the PAC finalize a list of reeommended projects for this year's Fund 313 budget. Prepared by:je ~/~ ~' //~~Date: Feb. 4, 1998 (~y D. Bits, MI:~ Bicycle"~rl'd~edest~an Coordi'nator ~' ~...x~-~(,~ Motion: Reviewed by: I x~ ~ ~'~ 1998 n~ Date: Feb. 4,K~ Made by: H~e~on,~IcP, ~~r~tor S~ond by: Vote: PAC Agenda Febma~ 20, 1998~ Item $.~ 16Gl PROJECT RANKINGS DISTRICT I PROJECT RANKINGS DISTRICT 2 PROJECT RANKINGS DISTRICT 3 PROJECT RANKINGS DISTRICT 4 APPENDIX TO ITEM 3.A. PHOTOS OF PROJECT CANDIDATES DISTRICT 3 Boca Ciega Broward Street Roost Road DISTRICT 2 Pahn River Blvd !6Gl 16Gl 16G1 iii I Ill I I I II I II II I IIII IIII II I ' - III ....... i 16G1 16Gl llll I I I III I IIIII .................. I 16~1 ' ~ I I III I I IIIII IIIIIIIIII II II II IIIIIIIIII I II I II ..... I I f ...... ~ ..... I IIIII I III I I ....... iiiii ii 16Gl" 16Gl EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Presentation: Alternative Recommendation for Golden Gate Objective: To present to the PAC an alternative proj~-'t proposal for the Golden Gale Meeting Notes neighborhood. Considerations: Russ Muller of Transportation Services will present his findings from a school safety analysis that offers evidence for modifying the current rankings. Attached is a diagram of Muller's analysis and recommendation. Staff Recommendation: For thc PAC to consider Transportation staff proposal. 7'2, S~ond ~~~( ~ Date: Feb. 6, 1998 Vote: by{~ C~ ~efin~o~, MCP, C~r~tor ~ PAC Agenda Febma~ 20, Item 4.~ !'i' 'I'i.d~?l'i'?i:f:i'i. .¥. i'] ['~;~[!l:]'-l'i'V]: I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Briefing: PAC Membership Update Objective: To introduce and wclcome ncw members to the Pathway Advisory Meeting Notes Committee. Considerations: The Bike/Ped Coordinator is pleased to wclcom¢ the two newest members of the PAC, both of whom are sources of expertise and advocates of bicycling. William R. Dunnuck of Marco Island is an avid cyclist and member of thc local business commumty. Arnold DeHart of Pine Ridge is a competitive cyclist and retired automotive technology engineer. Staff Recommendations: For informational purposes. Prepared by Date: Feb. 6, 1998 Motion: destrian Coordinator Made by: Second by: Vote: Reviewed by: Date: Feb. 6, 1998 Ken I' Heala~nngton, AICP, MI~ C6ordinator PAC Agenda Febraary 20, 1998 Item 4.A CORRESPONDENCE MEMORANDUI~I DATE: January. 28. 1998 TO: Jeremy Battis MPO Department FROM: David F. Bobanick Transportation Director SUBJECT: Cost Estimates for PAC Prioritization Attached are the Cost Estimates for the top 5 sidewalk priorities in each Commissioner District to be funded by Fund 313. These were prepared and reviewed by my Staff and OCPM. Also shown are recommendations as to which side of the street to place the sidewalks and the materials to be used in construction. The current moratorium on filling roadside swales in Naples Park makes the 8th Street location financial unfeasible. The estimate of $700.000 shown xvould be a boardwalk facility if that were permittable. The Broward Street project in Naples Manor would require a piped stormwater system that would require extensive survey and pem'fitting information to calculate an accurate estimate. Broward Street is slated to receive an additional bike lane through the FDOT safety funds from CTST. An alternate corridor through the Manor may be a better choice. After you review of the estimates should you have any questions or require additional information t'ecl free to contact either Ed Kant or Russ Muller in my office at 774-8494. DFB 'my'Memo Battis Cost Est.doc cc: Ed Kant. Senior Engineer Russ Muller. Engtneer I · . 16Gl, Engineering Cost Estimates for 313 Fundin~ 1127/98 1116198 Lineal Ranking Roadway Project Limits Feet Location Material Cost Commission District 1 1 Thomasson Dr. Dominion - Bayshore 1435 N. Side Asph. $27,337 2 Boca Ciega Lakewood - Lakewood 4448 E. Side Conc. $52.229 3 Broward St. US 41 - Carolina Ave. 2400 Either Either >$250,000/per side 4 Roost Rd. Manatee - Grouse 2670 W. Side Asph. S24.166 5 Lakewood Davis - Estey 1210 E. Side Asph. S15,152 Commission District 2 1 US 41 North Pine Ridge - Gulf Park STP8 2 Immokalee Greenway Coch. River- Lakeland Funcl 365 3 8Ih St. 91st Ave. - 111Ih Ave. 5600 E. Side Wood $700,000 4 6th St. 91st Ave. - 111th Ave. 5614 W. Side Conc. $63,988 5 91st Ave. Vanderbilt Dr. - US 41 5120 S, Side Asph. $48,475 Commission District 3 1 18th Ct, S.W. Sunshine - 50th St. 1515 S. Side Asph,. $20,005 2 Coronado Pkwy. Santa Barbara - GGP 4086 E. Side Asp~-~. $39,085 3 Hunter Blvd. Santa Barbara -Coronado 4199 S. Side Asph. $41,130 4 Lucerne Coronado- Sunshine 1200 S. Side Asph. S14,791 5 Airport Rd. Seagrape - Enterprise Airport Commission District 4 1 Airport Rd. Seagrape - Enterprise Airport 2 Linwood Ave. Commercial - Airport Rd. 3775 S. Side Asph. S203,570 3 Commercial Dr. US 41 - Davis Blvd. 730 E. Side Asph. S9,308 4 Pine St. US 41 - Becca Ave. 1770 W. Side Asph. S31,052 5 Becca Ave. Pine St. - Bayshore Blvd. 1252 S. Side Asph. S18.025 6 Jackson Palm - Pine St. 1210 N. Side Asph. S15,055 Commission District 5 1 Lake Trafford L.L. Rd. - Tippins Ter. CTST 2 White Blvd. CR 951 - 1st Bridge 4890 S. Side Asph. $51,258 3 N. 18th St. Roberts - Lake Trafford 3604 W. Side Conc. $41,825 4 S. 7th St. Colorado - Roberts 2507 W, Side Asph. S38,709 5 N. 1st St. Roberts - SR 29 1117 E. Side Asph. $19,177 16Gl Collier County Transportation Services Department Memorandum To: .leremy 13at)is. Planner NIP() Bike,,Pcd Program From: l!dv, ard j. Kant. I'.I'~.~ .',;enior Engineer Date: January" _0. 1oo8 Re: R. oost I,',oad. East Naples ICornmission District I~ ..\))ached is a copy of tile documentation provided to me hv Russ ,X. lullcr of this office relative to tile subject roadway. It is evident from these documents that this roadway has been accepted by tile County and is under the control of the County. Based on the inlbrmation attached, this roadway appears eligible for sidewallc'bike path improvements. 'Fherelbre. the ranking that the I'..\C pertbmled last week which included Roost Road is valid and future considerations of this roadway should coasidcr it along with all other County-maintained roadways. If there are any questions, or it' you need additional intbrmation, please om)act mc at 774-8404. cc: I)avid F. l?,obanick. '['ransportatior~ :qcrvlccs l)ircctor Russ Muller. l'ranspormtion Services l)cpartmcnt Ken Heatherington. 3.1 Pr) Coordinator File: P.,\£' Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design Handbook November, 1997 ~.. Department of Transportation State Safety Office, MS 82 (850) 487-1200 Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Tallahassee, Florida November, 1997 S~ of Flor~ Depar~n~t of Tr'~'~sl~rtation I~G~ST~AT~ON FO~v~ BICYCLE FACILITIES PLANNING AND DESIGN HANDBOOK To: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PROGRAM, STATE SAFETY OFFICE 605 SUVffANNEE STREET, MAIL STATION 82 TALLAI-tASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0450 From: Telephone No.: ( ) Fax No.: ( ) Please register this copy of the Florida Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design Handbook. All future copies should be sent to the above address. THIS DOCUMENT WILL BE PERIODICALLY UPDATED TO REFLECT .NEW STAN- DARDS OR RESEARCH. THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT AND RETURNED FOR THIS DOCUMENT TO BE KEPT UP TO DATE. To be filled out by Pedestrian/Bicycle Program Handbook Number: Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construct:ion October 1907 Edition Prepared by: F~o~.m.~ D~A~ or COMMUNrr~ Am=^ms James F. Murley, Secretary Florida Board of Building Codes & Standard Doug Murdock, Chairman 2555 S~ro~mo O~ Boo'n~Axo T,~u.~.ss~-~., Fno~unA 32399-2100 850-487-1824 LITERATURE lhe carpoolmg canard. Forbes May 19, 1997. Motorists and bicyclists see blue, ..Reclaiming Our Streets. December 1997. Ruk, no. 109, Esquire January 1998. 16Gl f-r strategic planniqg, says with a wry grin. "t;l-: has a q,ccial arrange- o',col--liar now." -J/Cf .~KA.$1F The carp0oling canard \Ve had never seen a clean-air pro- er.un as misguided as ',t~ulbt'r;i (iahf~rma's ILcgulam,t IS ,l)cc. 211. I. UO.~}. [t was nlcnnl t~ c'a~ cno~uragmg tarpon,ling, l-',m so dra- Kn~scr I'crmancmc, thc was fined 5125.000 after := ~,:SbrcJ and free rides home for those work- lng tatc. Kaiser l'crmancntc's ~ffcIls¢? L.'nsatisfactorv b~x~kkccp- lng. among others. t:acmg a flood ~,t' complaims aN,ut Regulation 15, a rog,real auth~q'ltv nppoilltcd to m,,nimr a~r ['~dlt~tion around l.os .-kngclcs scrapped ~hc rcgulatitm and cvcnm. ally replaced it xvifl~ a t~r less oncrou~ ~mc, Rule 2202, an amended li~rm which took cfl~ct on lan. 1. L'ndcr thc new rule, more companies x~th l~xvcr than 2S0 employees. ra~hcr d~an ~t~st lOf)l arc exempt I?~m~ carpooling rules. In addition, companies that employ rcm~tc ,cos- tog devices in their parking l~ts idcmit¥ high-cmissitm vehicles arc gwcn "crcdits" ~oward pollulion- rcducli~a ~argcts. Thc amicar wing ~,f ibc mcmnliqs now acknowledges what lq ~s readers have km~wn all ahmg: that ca~ooling is not as clTcctive in reducing ming as simply repairing replacing fl~c 10% ,~f all can that cause 80% to 90% of urban pollution. "I think you've seen the last of thc carpooling statulcs, Ihanks Io abysmal ~filurc o( Reg. IS,' says auto cmi~si~,ts expert Gary Bishop of thc UnivcrsiD' or' Denver. "'Fbe Environmental Protection Agency hasn't been able to three thc car- pooling ~latutcs nn any other state cvcr since. In ~crms ~f reducing smog, carpooling is a bust." -S'rEPttAN t'{ERRE~ ,C I .T Y O F P O R T L A N D · O F F I C E O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O I~ CLAIMING UR STR TS BUREAU OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT DECEMBER I9~. FALL schools to teach kids bicycle and pedestrian safety. Each workshop T0 taught children ~,ow to wear a bicycl, helmet, choose ~. "safe" location to SAFETY cross the street and how to be a cautious bicyclist "We try to give th children the tools they need to get Back to school means back to safety - from point "a" to point"b" in one especially in school zones! piece;' says Officer Pete Bowman. The long summer has draw~ to a The traffic safety ~orkshops were hek close and that means it's time again to atVemon, Atkinson, Edwards. Chief remind drivers to "SLOW DOWN" in Joseph and Woodstock elementary school zones. This fall, the Pordand K I D $ YVA L K I N d TO $ C H OO L schools. If you would like more Police Bureau's Ti-afl~c Division and the information about "Pof~.%nd Kids on drivers that school is back in session and the Move" the Bureau of Traffic Bureau of Traffic Management (BTM) worked together to get the"SLOW that means slower speeds in school Management's school safety prog~m. DOWN" message to drivers, zones. The two bureaus hosted five ple.%se call Shannon P~rker at 823-539 "Speeding motorists and unpredictable children are a recipe for disaster." says Traffic Division Captain Pat Nelson. I N OTH E R N E~/$... · 'We are ste~ping up enforcement to send a strong message to drivers . it's MOTORISTS & BICYCLISTS just not accept.~ble to speed in a SEE BLUE As of October 4th. traffic fines are The City of Portland's Bicycle Program · S.E. Madison. westbound, between Sixth ,~nd Grand doubled in posted school zones, is painting the town in an attempt to "We want to take the lead in reduce conflicts between motorists and · East end of the Broadway Bridge, eastbound at Larabee making Portland's school zones as bicyclists. Bike lanes at seven safe as possible," says BTM Director. intersections have been painted blue .~s · East end of the Broadway Bridge. Goran Sparrman. "We hope to post part of a two year Oregon Department westbound at Interstate · N.E. Weidler. eastbound at Victoria signs warning drivers of the doubled of Transportation grant to test the use (I-5 north bound of{ ramp) fines in all Portland school zones of colored pavement markings at within the next few months;' locations where autos cross bike lanes. · N.F_ Broadway, westbound at Williams (I-5 north bound on raml: In addition to increased enforcement. The seven intersections are: · Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway the Police Bureau and BTM are using · The Hawthorne Bridge, east end, eastbound at Bertha several education tools to remind eastbound at the McLoughlin off ramp CYCLISTS SEE BLUE hst of fines that double in poste~ ' school zones. ~;..~.~' All seven of these intersections have Research in numerous countries. ?~'. been areas of high concern for both including Denmark, the Netherlands and ~ ~r, grd~ motorists and bicyclists. Canada, has shown that the use of ! to 10: ~ $102 colored pavement helps improve safety. To momtor the result.~ of the colored Four different colors are used in Europe: I I to 20:. $104 pavement test. the City has partnered red. blue. yellow, and green. The Bicycle ~ .,," with the University of North Carolina Program selected the use of blue for the 21 to 30:. .',$170 . '.$290 (UNC) Highway Safety Research first phase of testing ba~ed on several 30+ over: ,. $2_9? .~'-- $530 Center. Thanks to a federal contract, factors. Throughout the American ..':~.~-,.::~,~.. ~ UNC will be analyzing videotapes of transportation system, yellow is used F',tilure to ___~ . , "-. :..,.~, each of the seven intersections taken center line stripes. Red and green traffic control prior to being painted, two weeks have very distinct meanings - red si device: ' $170 ,, $290 after the paint is applied, and again do not go here and green means go. Ir Failure to stop ~everal months from now. addition, red can be difficult to see if for pedestrian "~' -'~- "We want to evaluate whether are color blind, in crosswalk: $170., ~.$290 colored pavement makes a Birk presented t~e color options to local fa, ute to obey "v.?~:~:-,,,,,. difference", says Mia Birk. Bicycle community groups and found that blue was tra~c patrol .,. ~ ,.,. · ~p.,.:.~.~:. .. :~-~ :.-. program manager. "Most conflicts preferred because of the driving conditions ~ : s..,, ..... .. ~.....-.~' , . occur at intersections so we need common to Portland. In Iow light and ~ j Imp~.,iL~,~ to come up with tools to provide conditions, such as rain and fo~ b~ safe streets for bicyclists." up. Other colors may be used in i ,. · ' ' 16Gl , Ruie No. 12: It's okay to be friendly to cops. Rule No. 109: It's okay to r~de your bike to work Rule No. 80: Ot. her p~ople's conversations always sound dumb. lives... Sing, but in private... Not sue 16~'1 .. P A C COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE SUITE 605 NAPLES. FL 3410~ -..~. ~' --'-"-/ (9-t l) 597-17.t9 , FAX (9.t 1) 597--i5(12 NOTICE OF PIIBI.IC MEETING NOTICE IS HERBEY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PELICAN BAY MSTBU ADVISORY COM~IH'TEE AT THE FOUNDATION CENTER, 8962 HAM.\lOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 ON Febru:~ry 4, 1998 at 3:00 P..M. AGENDA I. Roll Call 2. Election of' nexv Chairman and Vice Chairman for 1998 3. Approval ofMinutes ofthe JanuaD' 7 and JanuaD' 26, 1998 Meeting 4. Update on the Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan - T R Brown 5. Discussion on the Oakrnont Lake and Ridgewood l)rive lighting replacements 6. Discussion on Year End Report 7. Audience Pnrticipation 8. Committee Requests 9. Adjourn ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT TI4IS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND TItAT FOR SUCI! PURPOSE. HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF TIlE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE. WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 16G1 Naples. Florida Januap,.' 7, 1998 LET IT BE KNOWN. fha! the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisop..' Commiltce met in Special Session on this date al 3:011 PM, at the Foundation Center. 8962 tlammock Oak Drive. Naples with thc following members prcscnt: D-. Alan Varlcy. Chairman Mr, itcrbcrl I tasson Mr. George Wcrner. Vice Chaimmn Mr. George l lermanson (absent) Mr. Thomas Brown Mr. John ttoyt Mr. Rodkey Craighcad Mr. Russell Mudgc Mr, Frederick Flalto Mrs. Cora Obley Mr. Edv, ard Griffilh (abscnl) Mr. Anthony Pircs Mr. Glen tlarrcli Mr. Charles Poppcr Mr. Bcrnon Young ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Ted Brown, Akcrman. Scntcrfitt & Eidson. P.A.. Mr. K.xlc l.ukasz. Pclic:m Bay Field Manager: Mr. James P. Ward. Division Adminislrator and Mrs. Barbara Smnh. Rccording Sccrclar)'. AGENDA: 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Miracles of the December 10. 1997 Meeting 3. Update on the Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan - T. R. Brov.'n 4 Discussion on St. Raphael Site Plan Construction 6. Committee Requests 7. Adjourn ROI.lo CA, IA,: Dr. Varlcv called Ih¢ Inccling Io order and asked that Ihe Record show Mcssrs. Ed Griffith and George I Icrm:mson with cxcused absences. APPROVAl. OF MINUTES OF TIlE DECEMBER i{I, 1997 MEETING: Ir..[ludge moved, seconded b.v 3fr. /lasso. attd approved u,~nnimously, the I ltnutes of the December I0. 1997 3 h'eting, I UPDATE ON TIlE CLAM BAY RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN - T. R. BROWN Mr. Wcrncr complimented Mr. Bro~vn on thc presentation at Iht Tox~n }tall Meeting last evening and cx'c~'lhing xx Chi x'c~' smoothly. Mr. Wcrncr asked Mr. Brown if x~c arc still under thc paramclcrs lhal ~vc arc not spending any mono> s on dr;mings, etc.. othcr th;m what is rcquircd to gct this pcrmil? 2786 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMI'I-I'EE }ANUARY ?, 199g Mr. Brown rcplicd that ~as correct Mr. Young stmcd tirol xvc lmvc spcnl a lot of timc talking aboul why we have lo havc wa~cr consca'mion in Pclicim Bay and sincc fllcn I havc Ired pcoplc ;~pproach me aboul what il is going ~o do our golf coursc. Thc al:~rm ~cnl off and thc thing Ih;il I cmmot rcgislcr is if ~vc arc going to incrcasc our ~mcr s,pply in Clam B;~y by 2(~% through thc flap gales, why is Ibc amounl of w;~lcr really an issuc ;ill'? If ~vc gcl Iht no,ih c,d cie;ired tip so Ih;Il Ibc xv;llcr gels oul Iht p;Iss. Ihal ~s ~v]l{ll ~vC xv;llll ii lO do. O~1 ollc h;I,d x~c ;Irc [clli~lg Ihcnl ~c need Io bring Illorc ~v;llcr ill Io cie;Ir Iht p:lss ;lnd ~11 Ibc s;Hnc lime arc scaring cven'bodv Ih:Il we c;lll'l h;ivc irrigmion in Pclic;m Bay because Iht x~;llcr goes into Cla~, Bay. [I jllSi doesn't make :my sense. Mr. Broun replied Ilmt Ihc points bong made arc not lost by an)body who thinks inlclligcml>' abou[ Ihc PI;I~ ;~nd n;~lurc of Iht resource. [[ is "b' vicu' a,d your consullan[ IC;lnl's Ih;it Ibc resource itself has shown :~ rcmark;iblc dcgrcc of rcsilicncc. Wlml has happened OUl Ihcrc is lhal thc m;mgrovcs sclf-dcst~lct thcmsch'cs by conlinuing Io grow and csscnlmlly choke off Io a sm:ill measure thc ;ibih~ of Iht tidal c.xchangc mechanism to move xv;llcr in and out What Ihis Plan is dcsigncd to do is Io increase thc c;Ipacily of thc syslcm to do Ih:iL The best guess lhal cvcD'body can put togclhcr Ih:il looked at lhis s~'stcm bcforc il died ;l,d d,ring ils' dc;lib ;ind x~hat c:mscd it. was lh;~l lhc syslc,I Iosl ils' real c;Ipacily and Ihc~l Ibc cxlr;i x~alcr Ih;il c;lm¢ hi d,ring Ihosc vc~ u'cl vt:irs Ih;l[ cxcccdcd ;I ctmuHalixc of I(), inches of rmn. This c;mscd th:, ~v:,cr Io stand Dr. Sncdckcr poinlcd ou[ Ih;il in Ibc Black Mangrove area in paflic,l;~r [hc u'{llcr co,ld Sl;Ind o,ly for ;i rcl;llivclv sllofl period of time x~ithou~ damaging [1HIIIgFOVCS. Nlr. Brown conlhlucd Ih;il lily scnsc ~s Ih;il when wc improve Ibc flushing capacity. Ibc adjuslmcnls of frcsh~valcr inpuls will bc rclalivclv insignificanl Io Ihc ability of lhc svslcm Io o~ra~c Thai is a scicnlific j,dgmcm llml I u'ould be prepared Io m:~ke. Ho~vcvcr. thai docs not havc anyflm~g to do ~vilh Ibc polilic:ll rc;llhics, i w:ml Io slrcss Io you Ilml you cannot ignore those. It was m:~dc clear mc lhc vc~' firsl timc ! w;flkcd into thc o~cc of thc Army Co~s of Enginccrs and thc Florida Dcpamncm of Environmcnl:fl Pro~cclion ;md if you look at ;my of Ihe comments I]1~11 have bccn m:~dc by thc groups thai have bccn opposed or confronl;llional about it Ihcir firsl linc and cvcn Iht Chy of Naples objections 27~7 16(11 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMIT'I'EE JANUARY 7. 1998 ~crc "~c Ihink ~hc first thing you ought lo do before you linker wilh tim ecology of Clam Bay is adjust thc frcshx~atcr component". What wc have been succcssfid in doing here is Ihcrc is no defined plan in place that s~cifics any defined solution Io address that problem. II is basically a scl ofbrackcls and sludics Ihat arc m tire budget lhat develop a set of data after which that data will presumably drive a scales of initi:mxcs Ihat you can undertake that will salisfy thc permit conditions. I can say to you categorically an umvillingncss to address that issue in a meaningful and conscientious way would preclude anything bci~g done in Clam Bay period, in my opinion. Mr. Young Slated Ihat from a practical standpoint as long as we have Ibc flushing open and x~orking. Iht more xxatcr we have gelling into Iht system Ibc belier we are going lo bc for keeping Clam Pass opened Mr. Brox~n replied that there is so~ ora break point Ihcrc and if)'ou think back Io Mr. Tackncy's slalemcnl, there are Ixvo atlributed Io dml. There is Ihe atlribute of keeping Clmn P:~ss opened, which is cvc~'lhing from Ihe Soulh bonrdwalk south dox~n Io the Scagalc culvert and Ihe xxatc, so~ of slays there. One response is dmt it is all x'e~' imcresting, but the facl of lhe matlcr is lhal the government is nol going to allow this group or any group lo go out into thc mangroves and deal xvilh Ihal problem unless you arc willing to deal x~ilh the other issue. [ would say that is nol an irresponsible response. I lhink there are a number ofd~ings you will find that you will be able to do th:it will have no delclcrious afl:ct on the quality of life xxitl~in the community, the qualily of Ihe x'egclative appearance in tl~e commtmilv or anything else. but which ::m usc less xvalcr going fom'ard over lime. Thc vc~' first lime Dr. tli[Icstad and I appeared before you. before 5ou ever s:fid you totaled us to lake Ihis job on. we said Io 5ou Ihcn that one of the componcms of any plan you would do would have to address frcslm'alcr utiliT:ltion within Ibc ~'slcm. I have collsis[ciHIv toiler:lied lb:il. These processes wc have been revolved in. if lhcv xvcre purely scientifically driven, might gel Io ~vherc you Wahl lo go fi~stcr xvilh less aggravalion. They arc polilics. science, an and I:m'. Somelimcs it has nothing to do widl anylhing olhcr lhan in Ibc eye of the beholder. Mr. Brox~n comint~cd dml if this system could have flushed in thc mid-nineties, had these clmnncls in place and had thc flushing capacity. I am n~l sure you x~'ould bare had any die off and I am not sure I xxould bc slanding here rigbl now. notx~ilhstanding Ibc levels of frcshxvater thai bare been 2788 JANUARY 7. 1998 coming into thc sxstenl. If there :~rc tilings that you can do lo retard ii and hold it back or to usc less of it. or to usc il more efficiently lind cffcclivcly. I cant's fi,id any disincentive for thc conmnmity not to do that irrcspcclivc or Clam Bay. To thc cxtellt Ihal yOtl lire willing lo commit yourself lo analyzing Ih:il. which you would be il' you accept Ihcsc pc;mits and to Iht extent lo which you arc willing to adopl thc series of protocols lo implement xvhat you discovered through those stiidics, you are ahead of the ctirvc and to be commended. Il is the price of admission Io do Ibc rest of it. Dr. Va;Icy staled th:il he is puzzled ~hy xvt arc so reluctant lo let on; own water go into thc system and xxc arc now slcaling thc \,,;lief from thc soulh of Ils. I have been puzzled from tile begin,ting. of holy mt,ch d;~la x~as required and insisted upon lo dcmo~slrltlC that we have Io unplng Iht pass svslCnl and how little dina is required to decide there is too much freshwater going into the system. We have been told thc qualit.~ is bad. nobody has thc data Io sa.',' that. We have been lotd there is too much freslmatcr. but thc engineers say it is no different than it was before Ibc comnlunily was built. Mr. Bro~xn replied. Ih;it is not tree. There is mom \vale; going in than there was historicall,, It chiefs tile s.xstcm m a qmtc different way arid one of thc things xvc don't know because x~c don't h:~x'c any data :md one of thc studies designed to do this. is lo dele;mine thc timing of when it enters. When there was nothing here. it rained and either cvapor:ttcd, pondcd ill dcprcssional areas and seeped down into ground x~atcr or if there was enough rain it would sheet ilo',,,' through sonic sand. scrub arc;is and is quite a different quality of water erecting thc system and thc timing of il was :l lot different. Wc arc now holding water ;~rlificiall.~ and it is coming in constantly. We have said to you before Ihat xvt can demonstrate th;it there is a constant recurring small level of sheet flow of frcslnvatcr in thc system. Thc s.xstcm has shox~n itself very capable o£ handling that. except in extreme circumstances. \Vt h::d some extreme circmnslanccs th:it gave rise 1o thc essential droxvning of the mangroves. Thc answer to thc question is Ihat xou ;irc pmt~ng somcxxhcrc bcmccn 26".27" pc; year of additional xvalcr into thc system, beyond x~hat ,Mother N:mtrc pro\ides for. simply by virtue of the irrigalion you provide. There is a lot more being dealt with no',\, but il is being dealt xxilh quite differently. When you look ',~t the level of impervious surfilcc and ,,vh;~t xot, have run off. collccl and hold in storage, it is quite different. 2789 16G£ PELICAN ~AY ADVISORY COMM~EE JANUARY 7. 199~ Dr. Varlcy slalcd xvc hear different descriplions of Ihal. When wc complain about asphalting arc told by engineers that it does not make a difference. It is all thc same. Thc same amount of xvatcr came before as does now. If we were Io do these studies and able Io convincingly dcvclop data Ihal said thai Iht frcslmmcr component has nolhing Io do wilh thc mangroves dying, are we still thca commillcd lo tm(Icnakc some big program? M~ Bro~u Slalcd no, he docs not Ihink so. I Ihiuk Iht govcrnmenl prides itself on being responsive Io good science. I think Ihat you will find Io thc cxtcnl that ~ou have reached those concJustolls, that )ou belier have your good science backed up because they ~ill challenge it until you can dcmonslratc Ih;~t clear preponderance of evidence Ihal you are righl. Having said Ihal. my sense is Ihal Ihcy ~ould behave responsibly. Mr. Mudge Slalcd Ihal he thinks there is slill confl~sion here thai ~vc arc using lrcalcd cmucm. I lhink ~ is loci",;, Ircalcd now. Mr. Mudge asked if Ihcv closed do~vn the xvalcr field x~c were pumping from? Mr. Ward replied no. Counly-widc, including Pelican Bay. raw wmcr from thc hnmokalcc Road Wcllficld is being used Io supplement Ihc effluent needs oflhis communil). Mr. Mudgc asked irx~c arc usi~g 750,000 gallons per day from our plant? Mr. Ward replied Ih:il our plant is closed down. II ~';~s closed do~n about Ix~o monlhs ago. so of the effluent is coming Ot~l oflhe No~h Collier Plant. I do not know ho~ n~uch is currcnlly coming of Ih:il pi;mi and how much is supplemented by raw water, but some of it is supplcmcmcd. Mr. Mudgc staled Ih:il Ihcro arc political issues here also. A lot of people Ihink xxc arc ~xasting frcslmalcr. A high percentage of our water is reuse ~alcr ~hich has a diffcrcm affect on th:il ama than rain water. Thcrcarcmorenulricnlsinlhccffiucnt. Mr. Bro~n replied lhal has ~loI been dcmonstralcd. Mangroves arc qualified lo perform that cleansing operation. This ~valcr is not conlaminalcd in Iht ~'stcm ilself. Mr. Ward st:lied Ih:it when we were talking about thc budgcls this past season, thc walcr quality going inlo Clam Bay is not an)lhing di~crcnl Ih:m xxh:il it was prcdcvclopmcnl. As a matter of filet. 279tt PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE JANUARY 7. 1998 haxc bccn able Io reduce some of our xvalcr qualily testing upslrcam of Clam Bay because of thc water quali~ going imo thc ~'slcm Mr. Mudgc asked if it is bcucr quality ~han it has been in Ihc pasl? Mr. Ward replied flint il is thc same. Thcrc has nol bccn a huge increase or decrease onc xva> or thc mhcr. Thcrc arc a fc~v inconsislcncics, but generally speaking South Florida Walcr Management Dislricl. which issued thc Surface Walcr Management Permit for thc project indicalcd ~o us lifts year thai wc could reduce our xvalcr quality tCSlillg ill rise developed portions of the svslcm because I1 has changed in thc fifteen jcars ~xc have been doing thc testing. Mr. Wcrncr slalcd lhal In lislcning IO Mr 'l'ackncy. I gol Ibc impression Ih:il lie was sa}rog IJus m:l} nol ~olk Iht ~x;i~ }ou ~xanl il Io xxork and I don'l ~V{lll[ Io bc Iht scapcgoal. Do )oa gel lhal feeling'~ Thc ladx behind mc asked Ibc qucslioII Of Mr. Tackncy's indication of probabilily of success, which was never ansx~ered Mr. Brm~n replied fl~at Mr. Tackncy is son of professorial in style, bul I do nol think fl~a~ ~h;ll he is lO'lng lo say. Thc point he was toing to make and has been I~'ing Io make is Ih:il ~c ha~c not developed this mare channel design paramclcrs Io guaranlcc il as a slablc inlel as you would if VOtl arc lo'lng Io conslmcl an inlcl Io sca'c a navigalional nccd Thal is ~vhal was conflising FDEP and Beaches and Shores. They saw Ibis as a motivalion Io build some so~ of a marina facilil}. Thc~ ~crc nrguing aboul ho~ ~vc ~ould kno~ il ~ould rcmain slablc. I Iold Ihcm wc are building as mucl~ ~vc are nblc bmkt m a con~lrucl~ve rcsloralion prOJccl and lhcrcfore IOing Io do as lilllc harm ns possible, but maximize ibc oppoauml}. Whal Mr. Tackncv did s:n ~as Ihat baring some slorm c~cnl. ~hich changes Ihe rules for c~cabod~ m Ihill conlcxl, he ~ould nol illlliCipalO il need for any killd of subslanl~al mainlcnancc for lixc Io seven >cars. If Ih;ll is Ihc c;Is¢ )Oil arc way ahclld of lhc cun'c Ih:l~l xxhcre >ou arc Mr. Wcrncr slaled Ih;il we will also spend a Iol of money to achieve thai. Mr. Broxvn agreed I believe in the group of people we have brought logclher Io look at this ma,er. I belicxe m lheir qu:flificalions. I believe if>ou heard cvco'lhing said in yesterday's prcsem:mon. noflfing has bee,, done x~ilh a lack of thoroughness. We have looked nt ex'cO' angle x~e could within 2791 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1 6 JANUARY 7, 19'),~ constraints of ll~c revenue slrcam Ihat ~e have ~o look at firings and have come axvay absolulcly convinced Ih:it il x~ill work and Iht s~stcm will rcslorc itself and will slav in place ~ilh a minim:d amount of doxx nSl ream, ongoi nB m:finlcn;mcc rcsponsibilil). Th:it is lilt col~scnstls o[ voter collsilJl:tnl Mr. Brox~n explained Ih;il he mci wilh Commissioner Ilancock Ihis morning x~ilh Ihe pu~osc making sure Ihal ll~c)' do nol gel blind sided as ihis thing continues Io evolve. It will ultimalcly go Cotmlx Commission for a vole. presumably based solely upon your recommend;ilion. Each Commissioner will Imxc ;~ book ;md ;I documc~ll from Ihe Slale of Florida mid Ihe Fcder;fi Government on lop of Ibc Plan and IO h:lxc Ih:il go Ihrough as a Col~scnl Agcl~d;i Item. il ~fighl be a bil inlilnid;iling. I do nol xv:inl Io Ih;~l poml in IJlO process and then have qucsliolls raised thai could have been answered well in ;idvancc of Ihal Iilllc J'r;llnC We discussed Ih:ll and in risc conlcxt of wh:ll xve should do :lbotll iL Commissioner Jl:mcock would like mc Io art:rage individual mcclings xvilh each of Ibc Commissioners. I will call W;~rd ;md lalk ;ibolll how IO do Ih;1l and I will I;Ike care o[ il. The olhcr couple of Ihings I xxantcd Io discuss with hinl is ;I lilllc bit ;lbout thc timing Ji~llilations ;lnd xxh;lt illlp;iClS Ih;il has i~r thc public beach arc:l during thc period of ImlC Ih;Il thc excavation and dredging would l:lkc place Wc basic:ill) br;linslormcd for a little bit about how to man;igc Ih;ll ;111d how Io ill;in:igc people's expectations about it so Ih;il 7otsr offices do not gel ~1 lot of calls. Th;it is some of Ibc things Ih;il will llccd IO be thought about as you gel closer 1o Ih;il lil~lC frame. We brainstormed Ibc lhot~ghl of perhaps ;I x~cck or so before ~vc ph)sicall) st;in to mobilize and do it. maybe a fidl page ad in thc Naples Daily Ncx~s telling people x~hat is going Io happc~l ;~d x~hal Ihey can expect ~lighl bc thc way to go. Nlr. Wcr~cr asked ifx~c xvcrc going to pay for that? Nlr. Brow n replied Ih;il ~xils llOt discussed. We jusl generally lalkcd ;ibotil w;ivs io go ;iboul it ;ind nothi~g in concrete, Whal x~:~s iml)O~anl is that I do Ihink it is going lo be important to manage people's tmdcrsl:mding ;fl~oul what lhcv arc going Io physic;flly sec otll there in order lo not have a Iol of discourse. My oxxn experience has been that iff people understand x~hv they arc being asked to sacrifice 90-120 da)'s of beach act~vitx for :m outcome Ih:It Il:is these kinds of bellcfils, l]le)' ;irc perfectly willing to do il. if they come to the bc;~ch lot;ill) unprepared and find a big plmnc of stuff being discharged in front of them. didn'l k~low ;~botfl il ;lied ]l:~dl~'l heard about il. they are tol:llly fn~slratcd by ii and lhat is ~hcn problems 2792 JANUARY 7. 1998 arise. It is an issue Ihat has Io be dealt with and was important enough Io make sure he understood all options have been explored and Ihis was tl~e way il would end up being. ! also niched him to the facl and you Io Ihe filCl Ih:il when wc finish digging thai large ch:mncl, a channel thai will now be about 40' wide. 4' deep and over 2.400 feet in Icnglh. considerable more xvalcr will bc going in and out. Frankly. Ih:il presents a real hazard to people who would nol be strong swimmers or have thc slrcnglh lo go across it. To dale people have just routinely strolled across Ihcrc with no consequence whalsocvcr, except under cxlrcmc circumstances. When Ihis is done I am not sure il is going to be passable ;ind I am son of xvt nccd to develop a managcmcnl slraicgy lo think ;~boul how we deal wilh th:it kind of an issue. Nlr. Broxxn continued Ih;Il J had a number of rcsidculs question mc about x~hv thc Cotlnly ~'~ls BOI p;]~icip:~ling in thc cosl and Iold Commissioner tt:mcock Ih;ll he should anlicipatc thc community would al some time be knocking on Iht Counly's door Io ask them lo visit lhal issue. I xvotfld report to you hc did not flinch and said he fl]ought Ihc Cotmly would be responsive Io that a~ file approprialc ~imc. you play and xxllcn you play Ih:il c;Ird is a sJlbjccl ofconlinuing dialog. I shared a fc~v Ihoughls with Dr. Varlcv earlier and I do nol think Ihal ~low is Ibc lime. but al some point I Ihink fl]crc is a lime Nolxvithslancting your historical experience. I xxould be su~riscd if sonic so~ of :m arr:mgcmcnt couldn't be m:~dc xxhcrc ~hc County xxould I)'a~icip:~lc xx'sth )'ou in lhc ongoing monitoring expenses Ih:il xxill be ncccssa~' and thc ongoing ~]lail]IC~I:H1CC expenses i~l Iht oul )'c:lrs thai will h:]ve lo bc bu~gclcd for. I'll close x~i~l~ Iht Ihoughl th:il ~]lv sense is. as )ou work on your anntml budgcls and ca,zh xcar gel anticipation of what mighl nccd Io happen in dJc s)'stcm you are going Io have to spend money for going fonvard. Ihal xxouJd bc xvh;ll )ou car~' doxvll !o Ibc Cot~nlv Io develop some soft of a relationship and conslmcl a bal;mcc of what Ihcv might conlribulc or not. That will be doable if il is m:magcd righl and wc gc~ ~liis Phin in place, broil opcr:ilional and paid for. Those kinds of expenses should bc rcl:mxcl)' diminimus, allhough in five Io seven years you might have to dig somclhing oul. I don't know what il cosl [l]c County ~o do what ~l~c5 have on thc small cxcavaliO~iS for Clam Pass. Mr. Mudgc replied Mr. Broxx n staled ~l~:lt if)ou ever have Ihal level of shoaling for example, a pos~ storm. Ihcrc can be :~ fair chuck of money inx oh 2793 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE :~- 6 G 1 JANUARY 7. 1998 Mr, Mudge stated that is paid by the Tourist Tax. Mr, Brown replied it has been. but thc Tourisl Tax is presently a subject of litigation in Tallahasscc where a group is contesting thc fight to usc thc Tourist Tax for things like dredging of passes and Ihings like that. Thc group that is suing is contending lhat it was only inlendcd io be used Io build tourist rclalcd facilities. How Ihat will finally play out. I do not know. If it were mc. I would be looking for [l~c financial commitment. Where Ihcy get the money from is Ihcir business. Mr. Brox~n explained that we got Notice of Inlcnt No.4 from Iht State which basically said they ~crc ~aiting on Mr. Tackncy's calculations. There wcrc Iwo other things which ~cre both taken c,~rc of Iocl;l~ ;llld will bc SCnl when I gel back to nly omco Iomorroxv. JllSl SOllle adjllSllllCnls IO drlmings Ih:il thc) xx;mtcd and Ih;it ~as c;Isv enough. If x~c cannot get thai broken loose. I am going lo haxe lo cxplo~c some allcrnativcs of gelling it done some other way. Mr. Itasson asked like x~hat? Mr. Bro~n replied masbc ! am going Io have Io approach another co;isiaJ engineer or thc Uuivcrstty itself to find out x~ hal lite problem is and x~ hy xvc can't seem to gel it done. Dr. Varlcy asked if Mr. Bray's visit here next ~vcck would not bca good omen? If he were pi:tuning on rejecting the Plan. I ~ould not Ihiuk he would be m:lking thc Irip. Mr. Brox~n staled thai there is no doubt in his mind Ih;il Mr. Bray is anxious lo get lhis done and issttc thc permit Yes, I do not think Ihal if Mr. Bray had an agenda thai was in any x~:t) compromising xxhal xxc arc tging IO do. hc x~ollld not come hcrc lo mccl with this group and talk with them about it lie isjusl x~:~lling on this data This d;lla is useless d;it;i, Io bc x'c~' bhull ;tboul il ]n having hmch with Dr. Sncdckcr x~c x~crc bcmo:ming tlmt x~e did not have the data 5Cl. but thc fi~ct that xxc arc having IO deliver il. I ;~skcd Mr Bray. Icl's assume for Ibc s:lkc of conx'crsation that xxc dclix'cr lhe data and x~e have adxcniscd Ih:il xxc can deliver producl "X" and Iht data suggests thal ti ~s "X-" and eyeD'one is m agreement that "X-" is still superior to lbo "X---" where xvt arc right noxv. ~vhal is thc big deal? It is not costing :my body any money except thc people that w:ml to spend it and there is no doubt in anybody's mind that once this is done. it will be definitively belier than ~xhat it is now or can be on it's own without this work being done. so xvhv tl~c data? This dala is in my opinion being required by tt~c Beaches and 2794 ,= ,, , ,,,,,,a ,,,111111111 III II I II II I II IIII ........... IIIIIIII PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMI'Fi'EE 1 6 G 1 ' JANUARY 7. 199~ Coastal Shore people, v,'ho arc ~our people that deal wilh marina calculations, etc. and they wanl some engineering kind of stuff in thc file. We arc providing it. When we agrccd to do this, it was a week to ten days Ihal it could be done and thai was October 23 and was not really a problem to me. Okay. if we can gel it done and within your budget, key up your computer and go after it. Well ~vc acc Januao' 6 Ioday and we do not have it and it has cosl us that ammmt of time. I have a high degree of respect for Tackncy's crcdcnli:fis as a coaslal engineer and has added ;m enormous value Io what we arc about and has been lhoughlfifi, ma)be to an extreme, but I can't be critical of thak As a result of II~at ~vc have a belier produc~ and a belier chance for success, but we have Io gel Ihis nail into the coffin and is vc~' fn~slr:~ting to all of us. Mr. Wcrncr asked if Mr, Tackncv ~as working on ;m hourly basis or a task basi~;? Nlr. W:~rd replied Ih;it hc is hourly xxilhin I:~sk ilcms. Mr. Wcrncr asked if his clock was licking? Mr. ~V;ird replied in Ihc a~rmativc. Mr. Wcrncr stated Ih;Il he Ihcn has no incenlivc Io x~r;~p it up Mr. Brow n stated Ihal assumes a lack of inlcgrily which I am not willing to acccpl. Mr. Wcrncr ;~grccd. Mr. Bro~xn sl;~tcd thai on thai basis tvc ~ould all be standing here t~'ing Io milk thc cow for anolhcr year. Mr. Brown continued lhal hc is [n~slratcd This is fi~c thing lhal is keeping us from getting us where wc want IO gel Io. These things hang by tenuous Ihrcads. I don'l think our Ihrcads arc frayed, at risk ofbcing etll ;llld [;filing. bul I warn Io get it closed as yon do. Mr. Ilovl st;]~cd thai hc hc;~rs Ihat Ihcrc is a shorlagc of reuse ~v;~tcr and my undcrslanding is that th¢x hnve expanded Iht Norlh Trcalmcnl PI;mi and closed Pclic;m Bay. During [I)c season they do no~ know x~hal to do wilh ;ill of Iht x~aSlCX~alcr and arc concerned aboul having to dig a x~cll for disposal, then Ihcy go dD' in May and June Mr. Broxvn st;lied Ih;H is not directly rclalcd to lhis issue. But it is symptomalic ora problem that faces ;ill of Florida. cs~cially ~nions where Ihcrc is vc~' he;ny gro~lh pressure, Your grox~lh here 2795 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMI'FT'EE 1 6 ~ 1 JANUARY 7. 1998 considerably morc seasonal than in places like Orlando where I mn from. That is prctty much ycar round. I do nm know all of Ihe answers Io that. I only know that as I t~' lo stay abreast of thc water issues, it is Ibc defining issue in Florida as wc go fom'ard into Ibc millenninm and beyond. Even in Collier County as they straggle Io define Ibc nrban scm'icc botmdaD', those arc all directly and indirccllv related lo water and natural resource issues people arc dealing with in the contcxl of gro~th. I don't know anybody has all of thc aus~crs. When xve firsl x~enl 1o thc Coumv and were blindly in thc initial slagcs of this process, Ihinking about why don'l x~c jusl curtail some of %vhal we lake from lhe County m our s~stcm, lhcy didn't have a problem with thai. Would they have a diffcrenl outcome loday based on whal you arc IcIling mc. I do nol knorr. Ma>be Ihcy %~ould insist on you disposing of your share. Milch impacls some of the analssis you arc gelling ready lo do in Ihis slndv. Those are some oflhe lhings you arc going to nccd to look at to see ho~ they impacl Ihe system Io see what yon can and cannot do as you work your Ihrough Ih;il. F~rsl. I think ~1 is important I]lal yOU do it and cc~ainly important under Ibc terms of Ibc pcrmil, bul more ~mponant Ihan Ihal. I Ihink you will bc su~rised Ihal Iherc will be some obvious Ihings Ih:it 5ou can do Ih:il will satisfy the agencies, improve thc working dynamics of the communily, will save money and have no affect on lhe quality or life or the way you live wilh )our plant material within the conunumly Mr. }to~l slaled Ihat ~I is almost as iflhcv are playing games with us Mr. Bro~n replied Ihal there are a lot of g:nncs iu this. One of Ibc things Ihcv wrote back Notice oF [nlClll No 4 :lnd [ :lltl convinced came from Ibc Endangered Species people, not Mr. Bray in thai x~c have three dispos,d s~tcs Iodeal with cuts I, 2. and 3. Tolal cumulativedisposilion oflhree o[lhose culs is less lh:m 5.oIIII cubic >ards and any one of those silos is more Ihan capable or laking all of it. We have identified Ihosc sites in rclalionship lo reference monuments IhaI the State has in place along coasl. I get back in Ihe rcqucsl, which we are not going to do, a requesl thai xx'e go out and identi[' to Iox~csl degree of fimna and planls and draw them lo scale. Thc m~th of the mailer is lhat ~vhal we arc going to do ~vhcn ~vc gel Io Ihat stage of Ihe process, lhe locations are staked and lbo agencies can come OUl ~ilh us and if they ~vam Io move Ihcm 10' this way inslead of 10' that way. ~e will move it. That is p:m of the gamcsmauship and the stufflhcy like IO do. ~Ve have reached the point where ~e are no~ going 2796 PEL'CAN BAY ADVISORY CO,MM'~FEE 1 6 ~ 1 JANUARY 7, I')')1I to do any more, We are going to provide Mr. Tackncy's data. tell Ihcm that is all there is and vote is up or vote it down. ,I am going Io tell Mr. Bray we arc not going to play games at lhal level on lhis kind of ~nalcrial. Mr. FI;mo asked Commissioner Hancock's feeling on suppoaing and participating in this future mainlcnance program'/ Mr. Broxxn replied Ihal his suggestion was that since thc County had a historical relationship to the mainten;mcc of thc re;un pass area. they would pcrh:~ps be willing to share that cost in an ongoing nlalnlcnance c:~p:~clly and thai )ou Folks ~ould take on Ibc rest of it. That is a huge win because lhal is xxhere Ihe real money is ~r~ II~e COnlexl of long lerm maintenance obligations would be for this project. The Seagate cuhens ff installed corrcclly, ought to last well beyond our lifetimes. Keeping thc small ch;mncl cuts in thc tipper bays cleaned up is a rcl;~tivclv diminimus task which should not be required to be looked ;It ag;m~ for any period of time in thc fi~tttrc, Thc shoaling polcnlial from slorm events and other kinds of Ihmgs on Iht main channel is where eve~'body's focus will be in lecms of measuring of x~hcthcr xve go b;~ck in and take some more sand out at any particular point in lime. [~ in I~ct the County were xxilling to slep tip and participate or assume that responsibility. I Ihink )ou would call that a home DISCIISSION ON ST. RAPIIAEI, SITE PI,AN CONSTRI~CTION Nlr. Ward cxpl;lincd that St, Raphael is one of Ihe final buildings that will go i~l that is adjacent to our re;id Ih:~l provides bolh vehicular access for emergencies and pcdcslri;m access bx rcs~dcnls to our berm m x~h;il x~c comn~o~lx refer to ;~s S)slem Ill. In order Io conslniCl SI. Raplu~cl, th;it area become extrcmcl5 lighl for consln~ct~on pu~oses and as a result c.e Ih;~l lhe developer h;~s provided to us a plan that would ;llloxx for cotlslnlcl~on on Ihe she. but still ultimately mainl;lin vchictflar access for emergencies ;md also pedeslrians Ihrot~ghout the constn~cl~on period. We have a 50' wide c:lsetll¢Et in Ih;il arc;i. II str;Iddles 25' on St. Raphael site and 25' on fl~c St. Armands site. Whal x~c arc going to ~ doing is raising thc elevation of that road up ~o Iht finished first floor elevation of those buildings. They will constn~cl Ihe 10' wide palh in the middle of our cascm~:~t from asphalt and will also stabilize thc balance of 20' of thc casement al this point in lime. on lhe soulh side to allow for vehicular access to the 27'/7 JANUARY 7. 1998 back of the berm road. B¢cat,sc of Iht singing that is required, they have asked if they could do some of their construction parking on thc St. Armands site and Ihcn provide for a mechanism for those vehicles to cross thai area periodically. We have provided one vehicular access point for Ihc~l~ to do Ihat which xv:,ll allow those cars Io cnlcr from Pelican Bay Boulevard and park in Ihis area. During thc times that they will bc bringing parking in and out. they will have people or signagc at Ihis location Io control that access. There Ss also a crane Ihal x~ll bc required lo be moved on thc back of thc site and Ihcy have provided an additional access poml Ihat xxill gated such that you will not be able to transverse il constantly, that will alloxx Ih;il crane to move in and out. Thc site will bc completely fenced and thcy will provide s;gnagc along Pclic;m Bay Boulevard ~shich will bc Icmpora~' ;md provide rcsidcnls the route thai Ihcy will able Io ulih/.c to xsalk that p;~tlmny. They covered a portion of Iht casement to allow residents to ~s'alk in thc locations x~hcrc Ihc cranes will be x~'orking to provide safety for thc rcsidcnts Mr W;~rd continued thai xvc get a lot of qucslions in thc office about lifts p;tnicular area because ~t ~s trader constmclmn ;~11 thc time. I think Gulf Bay ditl a super job ~n coming lo 0m pi:itc x¥ilh this kind ora plan IO allow for access I thought )'ou xxould like to bc :re'arc ofx~hat is going on in Ih;il Iocalion and I xx:mlcd Io sec if )ou had :my addilional input into this particular plan Ihat might make it easier to provide pcdcstri;m :~cccss for thc residents because i kno~ Iht developer ~ould be willing lo do ~xhalcvcr is reasonable in Icrms of providing thai additional kind or:recess. That is thc plan ;md if it is acceptable Io cvc~'onc il will be implemented as pan of thc construction of Ibc SI. Raphael on ll~c front side of lhc construction xxhich is what I xxas looking for xvhcn il comes lo prox'tding pcdcstn:m access and constructing thai berm lo a level thai would allow ~ltcr access lo Iht berm. Thai access is relatively righ~ noxv. Iloods xc~' easily and is prcuy much a mess at Ihis poml in Imm With Ihis plan it ~ill raised thc clcxation Io finished floor elevation, get you an asphall sidcxvalk going back Io il and slabilizcd area For xchtcular access for emergency x chicles. Dr. Varlcx asked xxlml thc finished easement will look like? Mr. W;~rd replied Ihat it xxill bc in the same location and ~xhcn finished thc asphall path will slay thc same. thc concrete crossings Ihal go in will come otll aild paved over with asphalt. They have a landscaping plan Ihal ~¥ill bring up Ihe balance of lhat 50' casement area and sod and pl;li~l lhc resl of il. 2798 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ,'~ 6 6 1 JANUARY 7. 1998 Il ,.,.'ill be a prclly plamed area ,,,,'lien it is colnplctc. Il will be a 10' wide sidewalk with a 20' vehicular access to thc Soulh or [i.. Mr. Mudge slated it is going to be a tn~cjam at 3:30 P.M. Nlr. Ward replied Ih;il it sure is. bul bcucr than Iht alternative. Wc xvcrc looking lo get il inlo a shape where it is useable during thc eighteen months construction of St. Raphael and I think this does that for 5o.. ranch belier Ih;in x~ hal you bare now. Mrs. Oblcy agreed saying Ib;ll thc fence and covered ;irc:l Wotlld protccl some of Ihc debris that might be blox~ing when thc cr;mcs arc operating. Mr. Ward replied thai they are going to fence nol only Ibc property lines, but the casement lines also. Construction personnel :md debris will not fall o,,'er into Ih;~t casement area. It will look like a long narrow path For access right now. Mr. tlo3t asked if thc Noah Naples Fire Dismct and ShcriWs Department approved of this plan? Mr. Ward replied Ihal Iht ShcriWs Dcp:mmcnt has been talked wilh. but xvt have not talked xvid~ EMS and I do know Ih:ti xx'c have asked Gulf Ba~ to submit it to thc Noah Naples Fire Station to make sure they were h:q)l)y wilh Ibis kind of access. Th~s is actually better access Ih;in what they have noxv. Mr. Hasson asked ifx~c have to approve lhis for Ihcm Io do il? Mr. W:lrd replied Ihal no 5otl do 11ol. Mr. Yotmg stated Ih:it xvc have an casement here and x~c do bare to approve it. We formally have 1o a~provc ~t in order for thenl lo be using it. Mr. Tom Broxvn Slaled that Ihis is a guy that x~:mts to go 250' in height, tear up thc median and bonghl some oflhc berm from WCI and did cvc~lhing he could 1o hold on to it. I think he would like to contribute some money Io the nlangrovcs. Mr. Ward replied that he is contributing significant money to Iht mangroves. He has roughly 700 undeveloped units in Pelican Bay Ih;it he can build, lo which he has been paying thc $86.0o per unit per year. Mr. Tom Brown replied Ihat he me,mi over and above Ih;it conlribulion. 2799 JANUARY 7, 1998 Mr. Worrier stated this is a significant improvement. Mr. Ward replied Ihat irrcspcclivc of what has happcncd in tile past. he feels Ihis is a significant contribution. There was no requirement in thc development approval process Ihat Ibis be constructed on thc front side of thc development. I specifically had called tile developer because of thc complaints that xvc have gotten Ibis ycar and tile comments ! had gotten from tile Advisop,.' Committee on that front sidcxralk and asked il' they could come tip with a platt that would improve this berm road at this point in lime versus at lhc cad of thc dcvclopmcnl phase ~o conlinually provide rcsidcnl access and better emergency vehicular access. I think they came lo thc plalc xxilh a good plan. Mr. Young Slalcd Iha! if there arc gates on thc crossovers, how do we get Ihc emergency vehicles Io thc berm'! Mr. Ward replied thai Ibc gates arc not cast/xvcsl accessed. Thc elevation will be raised to thc finished floor clcvalion and will not be a ditch. You will go around thc covered :~rca and not have to access Ibc gales. Dr. Varies slalcd lb.'it tile access offof fire slr¢ct does not appear Io be 50'. Mr. \Vard replied that the drivcxvav is in lite easement area and has alrc;~dy been raised. Thc balance of lite access road will bc raised 1o thc existing elevation. Mr. IIasson asked whose responsibility il is Io maintain this road and who is liable ifa pcdcslrian is hurl" Mr. Ward replied Ih;il the underlying fee title of thc property is Gulf Bay. so whatever the dcvclopmcnl IlZlCrCSlS name is h/IS thc fcc lille. \Vt have the casement over il for [)tlr'poses of xxalcr II~an:lge~nent an:Hnlel~ance access 1o il {Hid we have COnlinuall5 fried Io alloxv access b.v residents. [ :vould assu,nc if someone gets hurl. they arc going lo go after Iht developer, file Cotmty and Pelican Bay Sen'ices Division. The maintenance of rite road is Ihc Pelican Bay Sen'ices Division's responsibility. Mr. Young staled thai some of Ihis property has been deeded Io lite Foundation so tile.',' are also inx'olvcd. Dr. Varlcv staled Ihal v,'c have a .50' cascmc,u, but Iht driveway takes up parl of that casement. Ihcn we dor~'l have a 50' easement. PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMI'I'TEE JANUARY 7. 1998 Mr. Ward replied that you have a 50' casement. If you look at thc alignment of the drivcx~av it was intended to allow for vehicular access at Ibc completion of construction of thc txvo projects. We left II~e alignment. You have 50' out flmre right now. but you don't know flint because you don'l sec il. You see a whatever Ihe widlh of Ihal walkway is right now. An emergency vehicle will come in flmir entrance and continue to drive on. Mrs. Oblcy stated that Water Park Place is contemplated lo be a galcd community. Mr. Ward agreed, staling Ihat it would be gated after tl~c turn. Mrs. Oblcy stated flint she would be happy Io gel the construction cars off of Iht road. Mr. Ilk, rner re,veiL .,'econded &l, Mrx. Oble)' ttnd ttpproved on a vote ~ I1/0 tit ~tpprm'e this plum tis pre.~'ented ~;r vehicular and pede.¥tri~ot ttcce.~7~' I;)' 3~. Rtq~hael prior to construction and the crt~ssover~' ttml overhettd protectitm ,qll be return'ed at the time t~ completion ~ the ,Yt. Rttphael prt~ect.. Mr. ~'res abstained porn Mr. Young st:lied Ih:it il is ilnpollanl Ih:il ibis be done by IbC completion of Si R:iphacl because ~c do not know x~hcn thc ncxl phase is cvcr going Io bc developed and xve do not xv;ml our access road jeopardized ag:mi rot thc completion of Walcr Park Place. Mr. W:lrd agreed Th:it xx:is one oflhe issues xxe had xxhen xvt were rcvicxving SI. ~qphael. Mr. Fl:mo staled thai he has been in insurance for 45 years and xvhv couldn't tl~e condition be placed on the developer for any liability if there is a Calastrophic situation. Why should the Foundalion or Pelican Eay Sen'ices be responsible on Ihcse premises? Mr. W:ird replied that iF you arc going lo provide pedestrian access Ihrough your water m:ln:lgcmcnl cascmCnl, which il is xour x~:llcr m:magcmcnl cascmcnl, by x'i~uc of Ihal decision, you take o1~ Ih:il liabilitx. Thc onl~ x~:lx to xx:m'c th:~l liabilitx is not lo allow Iht access or gale it Ifx'ou do it here you arc going Io end up doing it all along Ibc berm and Ih:il is not a feasible decision Mr. Wcrncr asked for clarific:mon purposes if they arc going to pave Ihis. raise it to floor clcvalion, stabilize 25' lo Ihc south of it for vehicular lraffic and do it pre-conslmction and are going to lake OUl Ibc concrcle crossovers arid overhead iq)on complclion of constmclion of St. Raphael? Mr. Ward agreed. PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ] 6 G JANUARY 7. 1998 Dr, V:trlcy explained Ihat thc construclion usc of this access to Iht berm would end at thc completion of thc St. Raphael. Mr. Brown slated that we never get a decision from Tallahassec in one day. it lakes months. Is there something else that is going to come up on this. Mr. Ward replied that hc could not think of anything. Mr. Brown replied that we should think a little harder because Mr. Young came up something else. Mr. Flallo asked if there was going lo bc an updalc with regard to Gulf Bay's request to a PUD AIIlcnd~nclH'/ Mr. Ward replied that )'our Agenda Package contained a copy of a leltcr to Collier County from Gnlf D:~y nnd WCI withdrawing Ihcir Petition to amend Iht Development Order. so that is a dead issue. COMMITTEE REQUESTS BIKE PATll PUBi,IC IIEARING Mr. Wcrner asked how thc Bike Path Public floating was going lo bc h;mdlcd? Arc we going bc here as a Co{nl~litlcc'~ Dr. Vnrlcv st;lied Ih;it il was his understanding Ih;il lye were asked some time ;~go thai if xxc were going to do this. at thc request of thc County. we shonld have some kind of Public Hearing I was assume thai as many members of Iht Commiltcc as possible will bc here. My understanding is that wc will be happy to listen Io :my comments, pro and con. and when they arc all done we would not make a decision then, but adjourn Ihc tnccling. At our next Regular Meeting, we would then vole on Ibc issue. Mr. Wcrncr asked ifx~c could h;n'c thc lady from Wilson. Miller allcnd this meeting? She made a reD' good presentation. Mr. Ward slalcd hc reit that would be appropriate. She is a bright lady and her expertise in this area is beyond reproach. Mr. Wcrncr asked if thc ShcriWs Department would be there? Dr. Vnrlcy replied Ih:il hc had wrillcn a letter to LI. Karcn Slrickl:md just before Thanksgiving and called her nltcnlion IO Ibc f;tcl Ihal this was going Io come np and Ihal x~c had sonic conflicting PEtICAN BAY ADVISORY CON~N~II~EE ~ANUARY ?. 199g opinion,s from thc dcpulics as to whether it would bc cnMrccd and could she clarify that. I have not received an ans~cr to that letter. ~,ir. Ward statcd th;~t hc would follow t~p with someone. Nit. Pircs suggested that a copy of thc corrcspondcncc shotdd go to Mr. Sch~5~'cr, thc Shed,s attorney. Nlr. Ward staled thai hc can~ot do that because Mr. Sch~'vcr is thc Shcri~s attorney, but I will dirccl il to thc :~ppropriatc people in thc Shcri~s Dcp;~mmcnt a~d ifthcy wa,t to pnss it o[~ to his attorncy. th;il is fi~c. Mr. Pitts ;~skcd for Xfr Ward ~o sc~d him ;~ cop)of Iht corrcspondc[tcc ;md hc ~ill p[oridc Nlr. SchDvc~. Nfr. ~h~dgc s~a~¢d Hint some Icl~crs hare bccn rcccircd wi[h regard Io thc bikc paths. Nlr. W;~rd replied Ih;Il wc h~vc aboul five ]cllcrs and Ihc fcclings arc prcl~y cvc~ al II]is lime. Dr. Varlcy sla~cd lhal obriously Ihc Sheriff is vcD' reluctant Io make any kind of a judgment abo~l enforcing ~1 and I prcs~m]c linc answer is tirol IBC)' arc not going lo enforce il. which to mc detracts from Imring thc bike ~4r. Tom Bro~vn slalcd thai somebody said Iht bi~'clcs do not stop al slop signs. ! was al Bay Colo~l) ;md six c;trs c;mlc ol~l of B;ir Colony alld t]ol a single one stopped. They ;~II came ~o a rolling stop. I ~c~]l do~vn Io ~Vcsl Botdcv;~rd. Ot~l of lwcnly c;)rs, rotor stoppcd. I lhink because of tragic and six,cch did ~]ol come to ;~ complclc slop. Bicyclisls ;~rc not thc o~tl)' o~lcs Ih;il do not obcv Ibc law. Dr. Varlcy s[;~;cd Ih;il prcmmmbly if thc police saw someone goi,g H~rot~gh a s~op sign they would be ticketed. I don't think Ihcy do Ihal with bicycles. PUD A~IENI)~IFNT ~r. Werncr asked if i~ wotdd sem'c any pu~ose for us as a Commil~cc Io take a position. pro or con. ~ hcH~r ~vc bclicrc, if cron Iho,gh Ihc Applicalion has bccn wilhdrawn, whether lhcrc should bc addilional hcighl variances granted? PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16 JANUARY 7. 199g Dr. Varlcy Slated Ihal we had asked our Commissioner if he would help us to be sure in Iht fulurc Ihal i~ Ihings like Ihis came up lhal this group would have thc opporlunily Io commcnl on il and I have never heard from him. Mr. Ward replied Ihal Amcndmcnls to Development Orders in Ihis Slate arc considered Quasi- judicial proceedings at thc Cotlnly level. Thai I~leans that when they consider ~l~e issue they act in a capacity as judge overlooking that Development Order. To Iha[ cxlcnt what they listen to in a Quasi- judicial Proceeding is thc tcslimony thai is provided at that hearing rclalivc to a specific application. Based upon Ih:ll kind of facl. thc Inosl appropriate time to do Ihat is when you have a Development Order silting in fronl of xou that has a specific rcquc51, you can evaluate it's faclu;fl merits and provide lcslimony Io Ibc Boar~ of Connlv Commissioners based upon that I~ctual i~fformation. Ofl~c,mvise. Inking position at Ihis I~mC would bc prcmalurc and Ihcy would not lilcrallv bc able Io consider that during that proceeding. That would be m> recommendation. MANGROVE BIIDGET Mr. Wcrncr staled th:it xvt should slav on lop of this Tackncv issue, both fimc-w~sc and It ls fine to say he is still within thc budget, but if pan of his job is exceeding what he expected Io get for il. xvt ;irc going to pay for il itl thc end I do not know who. because xvt arc nol de:ding xvifl~ a single m:m:)gcr like Dr Varlcv and I wanted, but somebody needs Io slay on top of Mr. Ward agreed. OAKMONT I.AKE I.IGIITING Mr. Popper slated fl~al xvt really have to continue to look al the lighting situation, I know it is an on-going Ihing. but il Ss dctcrioralmg. Al solne poinl svc arc going to have to "bite Ihe bullet" and get that lighting. Mr. Ward stated Ih;~l al lhc Fcbma~' or March Mcclmg xvc arc going Io make a prcscntatSon th;il lighling. FRESIIWATER/SAI.~VATER MANGROVE FIAISIIING Ms. Kafl~y Whorlcx' of thc Conscn'an~' commented thai wilh regard to Mr. Young's question aboul flushing, as far as Ihe Conscn'an~' i5 concerned. Ihis is ;m environmental Jsst~e. )1o~ 1~ political one. PSk~CAN BAY ADVISORY COMMI~EE IANUAR¥ 7. ~99~ MnnErovcs arc a hearty species Milch is what you wcrc told ycslcrday and when they sla~ lo ~cl slrcsscd they do not necessarily show it. When a man~rovc dies and you visibly sec ii. il has ~onc on for a number o~ years and SOnlcihing has tipped thc scale. In lifts case it was probably two major things, flushin~ and thc frcshwalcr input. Fhtshing is import;mt. Thc difference is Mint you arc flushing with. A mangrove system is developed lo bc in brackish water. Thai is M~y you sec mangroves along coastal lines. You don't sec a mangrovc in a lake which is totally frcshwalcr. You need a balance bcl~ccn )'our frcshxvatcr input and your sahwatcr input and what you have right now is more freshwater, in our opinion, entering than )on should ;md have created an imbalancc in Iht system and a lot of thc mangroves arc not tolcraing this vc~' u'cll, Espcci;dly thc Black Mangrove. Thc flushing that will occur whcn you make thc culs will allow more s;;llualcr, but xvc still think you nccd lo have somclhing done wilh your freshwater input. Ms. Whorlcv conlinucd Ihat u'ilh regard to pre and post development input at Pelican Bay, post dcvclopmcm as > ou have read you arc having aa addilional 26 inchcs of rain fall by your irrigation inputs. Which is 26 inches more limn you would gel from )'our rainfifll. That is a lot of walcr and not rain water but cffincnl Milch is loaded xxilh nutrients. When you pul that much nutrient in sS'stem, Ihcy accumulate m thc soil and c;m cause alg;m blooms and a lot of other Iroublcs Ihal do not directly influence thc mangroves, but Ibc system, which then influence Ihc mangroves, Ms. Whorlcv Slalcd that in response lo Ihc qucslion about irrigation "improvements" would hu~ thc golf course ;~ppcarancc. If you would look al Collier's Rcscn'c. they usc smart irrigation ~'stcms Milch means Ih;il they do not water when it rains. They have gauges on Ihcir system M~ich measures thc moisture in Ibc sod so Ihat you arc no[ over walcring. Thai development is a typical example of what you can do when you cut down your fc~ilizcrs and you x~'alcr more cfficicmly which is whal ~c arc dhving at. Mr. Wcrncr slated lhal Dr. Sncdckcr slated that mangroves would lhrivc in freshwater, which is conlr;t~' to what >ou am saying. Thc reason they grow in brackish water is Ihat Ihcy am nol a com~titivc plant ;tnd Ihcy do no[ have compclilion in brackish water. Ms. Whorlcv si;lied thai she believes he was talking freshwater as ~ing rain x~atcr, which is different from cffiucnt. I I III I I I I I I I I .... ' 1. 6 G 1 ~ANUARY ?. Mrs. Oblcy slalcd that she has had a pot of mangroves growing for five >'cars and Ihcy have bccn watered wilh hot~schold water. Ms. Whorlcy replied that if you put ihai poi oul inlo Ibc sysicm it is nol ~oin~ to bc adapted to thc condilions oul Ihcrc. Thc amount of freshwater you arc pullin~ in right now is mu:h more than you ~¥ould sec in a natural syslcm and Ihc timin~ is vcD' diKcrenl also. Instc;id o[ pcrcolalin~ lhrou~h linc ~rotmd which ~ould happc, if Ihcrc was nolhing hc'rc, il wo,ld slowly m;Ikc its way inlo Clam Bay and that pcrcolatio, deans it up. Whereas now you may have an abundance of water from a hca~}' rain and picks ,p cvcoflm~ in its mw and it ~ocs in ~astcr. It docs ~cl slowed down by your bcrms. Mr. Wet,ct slaicd Ihal if wc want 10 bc rcsponsiblc wc have to reduce Ihc amotmt or i~ation ~va~cr m thc COltlUlilllily, bul you have Io understand ~vc arc only rcsponsiblc for Ibc common areas. Ms Whorlcv slalcd she ,nderslands and warned us ~o m~dcrsland Ihai jtlSl because yotl cut down on fcnilizalion and ~alcr. you ;irc no[ ~oillg lO ]lave i1 brown golf co,rsc. Thai is ,or ~l~c case. Mr. Ward staled lhal there is no scientific dala that proves Ih;il Ihc q,alily cf ~valcr comin[ off this devclopmcm is dclclcrious Io Ihat man~rovc system. As a matter of [acl. irrespective of thc dcvclopmcnt il~;~l has occ, rrcd in here. Ihc quality of thc water is equal 1o what il was in thc prc- dcvdopmcnl stages. If you look a[ water qualily of ¢ffitl¢l]l ~;llcr. it is absoh,ely an tin,mc statement thal Ihcrc is ;I Iol o[ ,,iricnls in c~,cnl Ihal ~ill have an advcrsc aff¢cl oil Ih;il Clam B;w sysicm, h isjusl thc oppos,¢. Wh¢, ,c ~'¢rc nm,in~ Ibc Pclica, Bay c~,¢,1 s>slcm. Ihc q,ality of water comin~ [rom Ihat sYslcm ~as belier Ihan Ibc potable or raw walcr comin~ [rom thc ~round. Ms. Whorlcy asked ~vhai }'ou wcrc basin~ thc walcr q,;llily on? What is your definition of wa~cr qtlaliiy? Mr. Ward replied all orlhc m,ricnls, phosphorous, etc. All oflhosc Ihi,gs il~;~l you normally for. Ms. Whorlcy slalcd Ih;il Ihcy Icslcd for effluent on ;l ~ol[ course hcrc bccatlsc they wcrc usin~ and thc grass was dyin~ and ~c told them to gel off of it and thc ~rass recovered. Mr. Ward replied Ihal is not a linc stalcmcnt in Pelican Bay and never was a linc slalcmcnl. Thai kind of misinformalion is one of Ibc problcms. When you ID' ~o look at this from a practical 2R06 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE I 6 C~ ~- JANUARY 7. 1998 perspective there is nothing wrong with thc way tl~is systcm works. Politically this is an issue and I think Mr. Brov,'n adcquatcly and appropriatcly charactcrizcd it. Wc will do thc rcsponsible Ihing and addrcss il. This is nol an cnvironmcntal Ihing as far as I am conccrncd. Wc do put too much v,'alcr on our grasscs. lhcre is no qucslion about Ihat ;md '`ye arc going lo fix Ihat. Ms. Whorlcy statcd that cvcrywhcrc she gocs and docs '.vatcr testing shc has Io sa.',' thc samc thing. If you Ihink about ~t you arc fcnilizing lawns and v,'hcn no onc ,,','as hcrc you didn't fertilize. Where does all of Ih;.ll extra fertilizer go when it rains? Mr. Young slated into our lakes. Thai is why our holding syslcm is intertwined. Mrs. Oblcy stated Ihat when you speak about smarl irrigalion, we find people that arc rcnovaling their systems or arc starting n¢~v arc using tile correct situalion. The golf course '.'`'ill probably be doing Ih:il also '`vhcn they nccd Io replace Ihcir ~'slcm. You just can't tear out a system Ihat is working and start all over again. ADJOURN There being no fimhcr business, tile meeting adjourned al 4:35 P.M. Dr. Al:m Varlcy. Chairman 2807 · You mu.st complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for r~:ording the minu:e: the meeting, who must incorpo~t'~ thc form in the minutes. A copy of thc form must be provided immediately to the o: members of the agency, and thc form mu.st be read publicly at thc next meeting after the form is filed. (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) ~ inured to my special private gain; ~ inured to the special gain of my buiiness associate, ...~red to the spec~l gain of my relative, ... ~ .~ .-r. whomLa~t retained: or ~ ~nure~a to me special gain ol is the parent organization or subsidiary ora principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting inter~st in the measure is as follows: Approve plan for vehicular and pedest:r±an' access by St. Raphael. prior to construction and the cross-overs and overhead protection will. be removed at the time bf complet:ion of the St. Raphael project. NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1991). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY RE( DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWtN IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION, REDUC'I, ION SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOTTO EXCEED S5,000. ~ ..-- ""' i ORM 8BMEMORANDUM illll ii I IIIIIIIII II II IoFIIvoTiNGIIII .... CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS DATE ON WHICH VO~ OC~RRE~ . WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B T~is form is for use by =ny person serving =t the county, city, or other Ioc=i l~ei of government on zn appo~:ed or ele~=d counci}, commission, authority, or committe,. It applies equzl]y to members of advisory znd non-advisory bo.i~ who aze with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statute. Your responsibilities unde~ the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly dependi~_= on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this r~ason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this fo .m-.. before completing the reverse side and filing the form. Ir, ISTRUC'~ONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding electiv~ or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a m~a.~u.'-= which inur~ to his special private gain. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measu.-. which inur~ to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he ks retained (including the parer.: organization or subsidiary.of a corporate principal by which he is r~tained); to the special private gain of a relatiw; or to the special private gain of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.3.56 or 163.357. F.S.. officers of independent special tax distric~ elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a 'relative" includes only the officer's'father, mother, son. daughter, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in- law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A 'business a~ociate" means any person or entity engaged in or carr)'ing on a business enterprise with the officer as a panner, joint v~nturer, coowner of property, or corporate share'rmlder (where tee shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the asgmbly the nature of your interest in the measu~ on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN ii DAYS AFl'ER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the per, on responsible :'ct recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may panicnpate in the~: matterx. However. you must disclose thc nature of thc conflict bcfor~ making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. ' IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WLL BE TAKEN: * You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the pcr~on r~sporaible .:or recarding thc minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. · A copy of the form must be providM immediately to the other member's of thc agency. ~_* The form must be r~d publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. ~ .~ ~.., , ~ ~ III II II IIII IIIII I IIIII II II ~ III I IIII II II I Naples. Florida Janu:lry 26. 1998 LET IT lie KNOWN. Ih:il tile Pelican Bay MSTBU AdvisoD' Commillcc mci in Special Session on dalc :i' 9.~11 A NI nt the FotHIdnlioH Cc~ll¢r. g962 }lammock Oak Drive. Naples xvifl~ Iht follox~ing Dr. AI:,~ Varlc~'. Ch:~irman Mr. ttcrbcn I tasson (abscm) X~r Gc~rgc Wcrncr. Vice Chnirman Mr. George tlcrmanson Mr. Thon~:~s Brox~n Mr. John [lo~t Mr Rodkc~ Cra~ghc:id Mr. Russell Mr Frederick Fiasco ~abscm) Mrs. Cora Oblcy Nlr Eclxx:~rd Gri~th ~:sbscm) N1r. Antimony Pircs Mr. Glen Ilarrcll Mr. Charles Popper Mr. Bcrnon Young Al,SO I'I~ESENT Xlr. James P. Ward. Division Adminislra~or and Mrs. Barbara Smilh. Rcc~.rding ~ccrcl:~rx A(;EN DA I. Roll 2. Discussion of Iht :~ppoimmcnt oF members oF Ibc Pelican Bay NISTBU Advisor' Co~H~illcc ~o 3. Adjourn ROI.I. ('AI.I.: Dr V:~rlcx c:dlcd ~hc mCCl~g Io order and asked Ih:~t Ibc Record show Mcssrs Ed Grifl~lh. Fred Flalto DISCI'SSI()N OF Tile APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS OF TIlE PEI,ICAN BAY MSTBU AI)VISOR¥COMMITTEETOTllECOI/Ny COMMISSION: Dr V:~rlcx 51:lied Ih:il xxe have received a loller fronl lhc Counly AIIornc)'s Office ~xhich goes out of ils x~av Io m:~kc cie:st Ih:il oHr recommcmhstions arc nOl cifl~cr needed or ncccssa~' It also reminds us ag:,n Ih;It Iht ('otmlx Co~s~l~issio~ is unclcr no oblig:~t~on lo p:~y ;liT)' :ItICI111011 lO xxh:H ti iS th:It xxc :irc rccommc~:ch~sg II Ihc~ goes on IO shy Ih:Il i~1 Ihcir opinion il is pcrfcclly Icg:fl and il docs adcqu:llcly compl) xs~th Ibc 5tmshinc L:lx~. bul nevertheless bec:mst x~c didll'l discuss lifts m) m~dcrsl:mdmg Ih:~t Iht Colllll Atlorncy xxanls us Io h:~xc a mccling and discuss il fo~ IIOI :11 ifil corn ~ccd l]lill ~xC :IF~ I1OI ~l:lki~lg II1OfC oflh~s Ih:Ill i~ really WaFrillllcd Or rcsc~a:mo~s as xo~ knoxs. :lbOtll g~lllllg illlO a big disc~ssion aboul Ihcse kinds of Ihings. Dr %'arlc) comsm~cd Ih:~l .l~sl :t bil of olhcr b:lckgro~lnd II1:11 I foci is mll~orl:lHI, is Ihal thc 1990 Ordin:mcc Ih:il crc:~Icd thc Aclx'~so~ CommillCC slalcd Ih:H a member cnn bc rc-appoinlcd by Ihe Board of PEI.ICAN BAY AD\'ISORY COMMITTEE JANUARY 26. Comm~sslo~crs Ibr one successive 1Orl~ it Ihere :~re no olhcr qualified applicants. One >ear ago when our recommctld:lt~otls were fon~;~rdcd. Ms. Filson quolcd ;~ 1986 Ordinance Ilml said all Counlv Advisor' Boards had Icr~s of office x~hcre Board Members should be limited lo Ixvo consecutive terms, bul reminded Ih;ll Collld hQ w;livcd by un;1tlitllous vole of Ibc Colllll)' Commissioll. Il is my undcrstar~ding that xsh:~t xxc arc do.~g this morning is firsl of all. do we wish Io make any recommendations at all if it is going to bc such ;~ big thing, [I is not ncccssa~' and if they :~re nol going Io p;~y any ;Itlcnlion. do xxe x~anl IO Ill;IkC ;IIIX I'CCOIIIIIICIIdllliOIIS, If SO. do )Oil still :lgrcc with thc balloting Ihill )ou scnl in. IfFou do. then xxc ;~rc fimshcd x~ lib Ih;il ulllcss )Oil ~illll lO co111111¢111 Oll Ibis business ofqu:lJJficalioils orcandidalcs Mr. Wc~ncr si;lied Ih;il Ihis is IiOI p:~rlicul;~r Io Ihis Bo:~rd. I midersl:md Ibis xsas a sl;mc~ oplcd bx ~hc Commiss~o~ m~d is al:plic:lble ~o all advisog' bo;Irds. Dr. Varlcx asked if NIr Wcrncr mc;mt having ;~ special ItiCcliflg? Mr. Wcrncr replied not accepting thc re;iii in ballots. They want you to go on record. Secondly. I would like to c'onlmt,c IO sec Ihc CommitlCC colltllltlC fo bc illxolvcd ill thc rccommcf~dallOnS for placing people on thc Mr. Wcrncr gl;lied th;it hc xotcd on Mr Nlttclgc ;Is one of his rccommcndations, but lhcn I saw his Mcmor;Inthmt ;mtl asked if Ih;~t could bc cleared up. Mr. Wcrncr asked Mr. Mudgc if hc still xv;mtcd to rcm;mT on Ibc Coim~lillCC? Mr. Muctgc replied th:~t hc did I have cn.loycd xxorking on Pclic:m Bay issues as ;m elected mcnd~cr of lhc Pclic;m Ba~ hnproxcmCnl D,stricl Bot~rd of Supcn'isors. as i~ party to tl~c suit against thc eOllllt~ X~]ICll PBID ~x;~s taken oxcr. :md in some xsaxs I h;ivc ilOt al~vavs bccil rcm popul;~r Xxilh softie of thc ColmtV Commiss~oll ;isld I c;m tmdcrst;i,d Ihal Thc Board of Supcn'isors xvcrc fighting for thc good of Pclic;m Bay. Things :ill ~xorkcd Oul fi"rix x~cll and I think ~vc gel along pretty x~cll noxv. I would like to contifmc Io sclc As 5'ott re;ix know I x~cnt lhrough ;~ r;~lhcr Iough year l;Ist ye;ir :lx~d I x~:ml to keep bti~'. but ~I ss .p to Ibc Board iflhcy x~aut to support mc. lfthcy think I should not nm agai.. Ih:~t is fine t~. I ~ill conlim,c to give my efforts to Iht bcsl of Pclicau B;~y. Mr. Wcrncr asked if there xxcrc term limils'.' Mr. ~Vilrd replied PELICAN BAh' ADVISORY COMMITTEE JANUARY 26. 199,'q Nlrs. Oblcy SlalCd Ih;il sh'¢ feels Mr. Sludge's background and experience is a value to thc Commtltcc and xxould hope thai he can continue on Ibc CommillCC. Mr. W:[rd explained Ihal he would explain thc issue in a liltle more global situalion. When you arc dc;fling with the Sunshine l.aw m thc State of Florida. most of the altorl~cy's that I have worked x~ ith can be somex~ hat conscn'alix e in our applicalion to risc Sunshine l.;IW. The Sunshine Law reflects on you as an individual, not on us :~s an entity. In the evcnl Ih;st something goes wrong, wh;~t generally happens is Ihal x ou as ;m ~ndixidual arc charged x~lh thc violation ired thai poses both criminal and civil penalties or ;i pOlCllllilJ [or I[iohc pCl~aJl~cS ;l~;llllSl )Oil. In illX undcrsl;inding ill SOlllC Of thc COtlfl decisio:~ lh:ll hilXC COllie dox~ll, x~c Iciid [o bc ;i [lille illOrC COll~C~';lllXC ill Icr~t~s of il~dic;~lHig Ih;il we I~' lo gel ~nOSl or all o1' the di~ct~s~on that thc Bo,ird has. Otlt II1 open ilOllCe of ptlblic lllCClillgS, I think what thc COIIIH3 Allorl~cx's Office ts in(hc;ll~g Io xota Is th;H although thc Icchnical application th;it xxc have proposed for thc rccommcnd;~t~on to Iht Actxiso~ CommiltCe x~as leg;ill3 sul~cient to meet Ihe reqtiircmenls imposed b3 thc Sunshine l.axv, thai the3 would more feel comfo~ablc in not having lo t~' and defend the technical application of thc Sunshinel.axx. They would likelo prolcct 3'ou in terms of insurmg that xvhatex'er do could hexer be ch:lllengcd in terms of x~hal Ih;it recommendation is thai 3ou put before the Board of CoulllX Comtltisstm~crs. That is x~h;~t they arc mdic:llmg to 3ott for your benefit as this Committee and my tmdcrsl;mdmg as Io hoax x~c appl) Ibc Sunshine l.;ixs al Ic;lsl across die Nlr. Wcigclcxplaincdthai Nlr. Ward explained some of thc issucs and conccrns. Mr. Ward had made ;~ R :qttCSl I~r Legal Sc~'iccs of our o~cc lo ask about and was prelty specific ;Ibotil thc procedure thai wiss conlcmpl;~tod by this Commitlcc in regard to addressing the recommendations flor the filling of x'ac;mcigs Ot~r office rcspon(lcd bx Nlcmo response x~}iich did rolJox~ thc Stmshinc Laxv. [ had even revicx~cd Iht incmorand.m bclbrc being lssHcd Xxilh rcg;~rd lo thc practice of Iht indivichial members of Ihis Committee providing in :~ xxr~tlCn form. ;i selection or recommend:iliOn for Ihose persons bcmg recommended ;md there was no issue or problem x~h:~tsocvcr. [ did not undcrsl;md that Nlr. Ward Admtmstrator of thc CommillCC xvotfld not be bringing ti by the Commiltee to ultimatel3 be presented Ibc Board of Comet3 Cot;l{tlisstoncrs ~V]lCll Ih;H xx;is clarified, ins thought xxas th;il the Board of Countx Commissioners has been Ihrou?~ a rather similar process as this a year ago xxhich had lO deal with the -2811- PELICAN BAY ADVISORY CO,MS. 11TTEE '~- 6 ~ 1 ,1 JANUARY 26. 199,4 solicitation and r¢commcnd;~tion p~:ocess Ih:il Iht Board of Courtly Commissioners utilized Ihcmsclvcs in the selection of Iht County Administr;s~or. You maF recall Ih;il Ihe newspaper lalkcd about xvorksheelS or ballols. I bclicx¢ bF lhe ullimale rcvie~x Ih;ll occurred b)' the SI;llc AllorneF and discussion lhal I had mx sell' ~i~l~ risc Allorncx General's off, ce. lhe Board was Icchnicall)' correct ~n ~ hal IhtF had done. The aclions xxcrc defensible. Al Iht same lime Ihe Board. Ibc CountF and Ih~ Couuly Allorney's OfFice were placed under some scrulin)' and I Ihoughl a less Ihnn fiwor;~ble imernalislic review because or the fine poinls mccm~g ibc lcchnical rcquircmcnl laws and thc pcrccption of thc Government in Thc Sunshine La~. In risc c;~sc of)our Commillcc. I bclicvc thai Ihc proccdurc Ihal you implcmc~slcd would have bccn dcfcnsiblc ;lad xxc Iold )ou so. b~l [ believe Ih;~l pcrhaps x~c x~ould bc bcllcr sc~'cd if in f;~cl Fou rcv~cw matcri:fls lhal go Io linc Board of Courtly Commissioncrs and Ihcrc will bc no possibilil)' of anF af~cr linc facl by olhcr sources. I1~;~I Ihc S~nshinc Law was not ulilizcd and inco~oralcd in cvc~' aspccl of Ihis p;micular rccommcndafion process. Lasl Fall. ;I slaff liaison had individually pollcd mcmbcrs ef thc Conlmillcc ;md xx;ss collccling Ih:il m;~Icri;fl ;llld reporting il back lo Ihc Board of CounlF Commissioners. Thc Board o1' Core,IF Commissioners in discussing this ;igcndil ilcsll wcrc a liltlc uncomfonnbJc Ihal all i~d~i~iiHslr;~l~xc con~[~[llccs ;~nd boards Ih;il ;irc crc;~cd arc re;Ill) supposcd lo work i~l ;[ collcclivc mode and Ihcrcforc :~ddilional rccommcndalions should p:~ss Ihro~sgh Ihc collcclivc bod) bcforc going ~o Ihc Bo;~rd of COIIIll) Commissioners for finid rccomn~cnd:[lion. Comn~issioncr Hancock indicalcd thai hc prcfcrrcd Ih;il rccommcndalions IhaI co,nc Io Ihc Board of Coital)' Commissio~crs from advisos' commillccs would in fact have bccn rcvicxvcd or passed b)' Ihc commiHcc as a xvhola. Thai puts Ibc members involx cd in ;~ slighll) more nncomfonablc posilion because )'ou h;ivc Io more publicly lalk aboul recommend:[lions or I;~ck of rccommcndalion not only for polcnlial new persons, bul also persons lh::l arc subjccl Io rc-sclccl~on. [ c:~n tmdcrslm~d Iht discomfort here. II would bchoovc Ihis Commillcc as well all othcrs ~o usc the collcclivc commincc conccpt if Fou choosc to make a rccommcndafion Io Ihc Board of COtllll)' Commissmncrs. Nit. Wc~gcl sliHed Ih;u in lhc ~lcxl Few d:l)s he is going tO bc rc-publishing a kind of"how x~lh regard IO thc Sunshinc L:~ Olhcr mcmos coming out vcD' shortly will include lhc gift law and public record I;m s -2gl]- Dr. Varlcy asked x~ilh Mr. Wcigcl if his wish x~:ls for us lO slarl over again 'aith a vole? Mr. Wcigcl replied Ih;il Ihcr~ x~;is somu Ilcxd~flily flmrc. Thcrc was ;m agenda p;~ckagc crcalcd through Mr. Ward Ihat xxas lo go to thc Board of Count) Commissioners. If you wish lO get this on nc:.,l Tucsda)'s agcnd:l I Ihink Mr. Ward and I can fashion an appropriale Executive SummaO' ilcm lhat expl:,ins an action Ioclay x~hcrcby you slarled fresh or )ou in facl revicw materials in tim previous nganda item and am' mochfic;flions )ou ma) make lO that I need lo mcrcly affmn thai this is what Ibc Commillcc ilsclf xxishcs. '['h:~t ~s not xxilhslandlng Iht f:~cl lit:ti >ou as a Commiltcc may lrcat Ihis a different way. As ;i COlllllllllCc )oll Ii:lXC Ibc :tb~l~lx Io fine lunc fins. but ~1 ss probably a bcltcr practice thai thc Com:nillee Ih:ii is hcrc do thc fine mmng M.'. Ward sl:ncd thai Ihcrc arc Ihrcc pcoplc not hcrc da)' tirol had Icndcrcd a rccommcndation and onc hcrc loda5 ~x hich had not Icndcrcd a rccommcndalion. Mr. Wcigcl smtcd thai his prcfcrcncc Ioday x~ould bc thc discussion be smncd frcsh and your rccommcnd:ltion as submillcd in thc pasl bc uscd as 5 our kcyslonc lo sta~ Mr. Wcrncr asked Mr. Wcigcl is [hcrc was a limit on thc numbcr of Icnns a pcrson can sc~'c on an advisor' bo:mU Mr Wcigcl rcplicd Ih:Il thc limilalion ~s mo normally, hoxxc~cr thc Board or Counl> Commissioncrs max m fi~Cl go bcsond Ihal and rc:q~pomt someone I~r an addilion:fl term iFlhcv choose do so. Mr. Yom~g sl:llcd Ihal Iht conchls~on lod:l5 is lhal i1 ~otlld apl)car Ihat x~c arc unanimous [hal xxould I,kc a mcmbcr Io sc~'c more Ih:m {xxo terms, thal x~ould Ihcn havc 1o bc spccifically in Excculivc Mr. Wcigcl rcplicd Ih:ii %olt :is :1 CommillCC do i~ol Imvc lo be Im:ltfinlo~ls IO recommend th:il SOIIICOIIC SC~'C more [hllll I%~o [trills As :1 collcclixC Board ~OII C{III Ill{IkC risc rccotlllllelldilliO~ somconc sc~'c :m addiliomfl tcrm bcsond Ibc limitations. II is Ihc Board or CounW Commissioncrs xsho un:mimously haxc lo acccpl Io rcappoi~l[ a nlcmbcr. Mr. Young slalcd lhal ~ot~ld havc lo bc holed in Iht Excct~livC SummaD' for lifts 1o occur. -2811- JANUARY 26. Mr. W¢igel slalcd Ih;it Ms. Filson is vcn.' knox~ledgcablc of coordinating Ihc information frozn the COlllnlllleefi and gelling il lo Ihe Board of County Commissioners in the Excculivc Summaries. Dr. Varlcy si;lied Ih:il Iht problem he has is wilh thc issue. We have kind of an cxlraordina~' silualion m Icrm~ of ;m individual ~ ho is vc~' well quMified. Thc Ordin:mce that crc:~lcs lhis Commitlec In:lkc~ Iht sl;llcmcl~l Ih;il a member of linc commiltcc m:ty bc rc-appoimcd by linc Bo;ltd of County Commissioners lbr ouc successive Icrln if thcrc arc no od~cr qu;flificd applicants for linc position. Txvo fldngs ll~;ll raisc ;m issuc in my mind arc. is thai succcssivcly a one Icrm, or is lh;~t one period successive Icftu. Thc odtcr ~s. do wc h;n'c lo dclcrminc thai [here arc uo other qualificd applicants? I have ~oublc xxilh bolh oflhcsc ~Ir Wc~l Slaled Io m;lke o~herqualificdperson Thru isullimalelvlheBoardofCounlvCommissionersdc~ermm;mon. This idea of ;idvlso~ COlllmflleeS i~;ikillg recolnlnelld;lliolls Js really nOl provided for in ;In ordm;~nce. This process lhal )ou have been asked ~o do does ~ilh ~he Board of Connlv Commissiouers. Dr. Varley asked if ~e.iusl ~uore Ihal? Mr. Wc~gel replied Ih;il )our are kno~ledg~able of il bul )ou do uol h:~e lo make a slalem~nl Ih;il someone is unqualified Dr. Varify asked Ihnl in 19~6 Ihere Ihal applied Io us since Ihis Committee ~as nol formed unlil 1991)? Mr. Weigel replied Ih;il il does. II applies Io Commillees Ihal exisl~d al lhal lime and any sub~equeul Commillees Dr. Varlcx Si:lied Ih;il lherc ;ire Ixxo xxa)s ofdoin~ dss Wc c:m sum discussing lhe applic;mls or jusl go ;IrotHId Io see ~f;m)bod) ~;mlS lo ch:rage Ihc~r ~Ole. N~r. Werncr si:ileal Ih;il this ~x;Is discussed nt lenglh al ~luother n~celing and r:llher Ihail gel into the pros and cons oflhe indix idu;fl applic:mls, if~ve are going lo do lhis in a public selling ',ye jusl indicate Ollr choices lllld liOI glx e thc rc;lfiOll -281J- PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1 6 G JANUARY 26. 1998 Mr. \Vnrd Staled that if>'o6 x~;~nt to do thai it is line. but with respect to Ibc rccommcndalions by Nit Fl:~llo. Mr. Gri~th and Xlr. It:~sson. xxhelhcr or not you wahl Io use those recommendations :lll~cl how I send Illis IO Ibc Board of County Commissioners. , Dr V;n'lev sl:lled th:il his tmdersl;mding ~rom lite County AIIorney x~:ls Ih;~t we should sta~ with jus~ the group here Iochb'. Mr We~gel :~greed Nlr. Pires st:lied Ihnl his concern is Ih;il Ihe Ihree individuals were :t p:~ of ll~e process and are now being exchtdcd from the process by not being able IO use Iheir recommend:Hions. Dr Vnrlcx slaled Ih:H xxe :~re up :l Iree ag:lin. We h;we Io do il by b;1llol and in a meeting and hexer h:,xc :m hi,solute :tllcnd:mce al a meeting, so somebody is going lo be left oul. ~lr. ~ro~ll sl~lcd Ihill Iht Ihrcc pcoplc Ih;ti nrc ilol hcrc Imvc indic;Ileal in wrHJng their choices. so xou h;~c cxenbod~ here. plus Iht Ihrcc ~vnlc-Jns. Mr. Wcrncr sl:~Ic(I lh;H ~c should follox~ Iht ;tllornc) 's recommend;mort Dr V;ulcF sm~cd lh;~ ~c sho, ld comm,c ;md poll cvc~'one individu:tll~. Dr. Vnrlcy nskcd Mr. Wcrncr ~v;m~cd Io ch;rage his bnllol? Mr. Wcrncr rcpllcd tl~:~t hc would I~kc ~o recommend Mr. H;~rrcll. Mr. Rocllig. Mr. Mudgc. Corncli;~ Krcigh :md M;mrccn McC:mh~ Mrs. ONe) recommended Mr. ttnrrcll. Mr. Rocllig. Mr. C:~rroll. Mr. Mudgc and Corncli;~ Krcigh Mr. Pircs recommended Mr. Harrcll. Mr. Roclllg. Mr. Carroll. Mr. Mudgc nnd Maurccn Mr. Popper recommended Mr. Ibrrcll. Mr Rocllig. Mr. Carroll. Mr. Mudgc nnd Maurccn ~lcCnmlh). Mr tl;u'rdl rccommcmlcd Mr. H;~rrcll. Mr Rodlig. Mr. Mudg~. Maurc~n McCarthy Corncli;~ Kreigh Mr. I lerm;mson st:lled hc had nol prcxmusk submillcd a rccommcnd;Hion bul his rccommcnd:nion x~ould be Mr Rocllig. Mr. Ilarrcll. Mr. Mudgc. Mr. C;~rroll :md Maurccn McCarthy. 16Gl PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE JANUARY 26. 19')8 Dr. V:lrlcy recommended Mr. Harrcll. Mr. Rocllig. Mr. Carroll. Mavrccn McCarthy and Cornelia Krcigh Mr. Mudgc recommended Mr. Harrcll. Mr. Rocllig. Mr. Carroll. Maurccn McCarthy and Cornelia Krcigh Mr l loxl rcco,mncnded Mr. llarrcll Mr. Rocllig. ,",.ir. Carroll. Mr. Mudgc and Cornelia Krcigh. Mr. Yo,ng recommended Mr II:lrrcll. Mr. Rocllig. Mr. Carroll and Mr. Mudgc. Mr. Cr:nghc:~d rccommcmlcd Mr. Ilarrcll. Mr Rocllig. Mr. Carroll. and Mr. Mudgc. Mr. Brm~n recommended Mr. Harrcll. Mr. Rocllig. Mr. Carroll. Mr. Mudgc and Cor~clia Krc~gh. Mr. Wet.er asked Mr. Young if he has sclcclcd a fifth candiclalc? Mr, Yom~g sl;lled tirol hc did not. Mr. Cr;.ghcad Slalcd that "nor did I" Nlr. Yotmg Slated thai he had noted Ihat he made no preference bctxvccn the remaining candidates and that is still thc way I feel. Dr. Varlcy asked what happens ir someo.c does not want to vole for all of Ihcm'? Mr, Wcigcl replied Ih:Il is quite all righl. For those not ;.lending thc n~ccling today. I want to inakc s~rc thai thc previous sclCCllOt~ doctlmc~Hs Ih:il x~crc provided to Ibis Co.nnillcc arc placed as record lod;lv and crc0 thing c;m be Irackcd Ibr dig final rccommcndalion. Mr. Harrcll stated Ilmt he finds it di~cult rcx'~cxxing people for rccommcndalion that he docs not know or have not spoken to or just have a Ictlcr sa3ing thc)arc intcrcslcd To mc in thc future, it would bc nice to cilhcr do lin'ay with voting or imca'icxv thc c:mdidalcs. Thc people on Ihc Board. thc Board knoxxs more Ih;m an)body, xxhich may or ma) not be an adv;mlagc. Thc people sitting out here that I do nol knoxv, not lhal it lbo. Id make a difference. I guess q.alifications mcan they are volcrs and have :m intcrcsl. It would be nice Io haxe their vicx~ or if we arc going IO act as a Board to cx'aluale, it would be kind of nice lo ask them some qucs.ons. Is Ihal something xvc could ~o'? Mr. Wcigcl replied Ihal he believes il is. -2817- PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1 6 ~ J~ JANUARY 26. Dr. Vnrlcv st;lied Ihat bcf6rc this comcs up ncxl ycar ~c havc lo dccidc x~h;~l it is and dcvclop a sSstcm that is stmplc nnd cnsy lo follow nnd cvcg'bocly can understand. I am persuaded al ~hc momcnt thai x~c shouldn'l do anything at all. It docs not mean nnylhing, il is not ncccss;~', etc. I have a vc~' di~cull lime mnaking n public fontal. Mr. Ward Slnlcd Ih;~t file vole hns Mr. llarrcll. Mr. Rocllig receiving Iwc[vc voles. Mr. Carroll and Mr. Mudgc receiving ICh xolcs nnd Cornelia Krcigh nnd Maurccn McCarthy receiving seven votes. You have a lic. Mr. Wclgcl stnlc Ihnl you should send Iht rcsulls and thc Board will undcrstnnd and make the decision in lite process. klr. Cr;m~ghcnd st;~ted Ih:mt he questions the Inll). Mr. W:,rd replied rah;mt )ou haxc canceled Mr. llasson. Mr. Gri~th nnd Mr. FI;mo's vote. Mr. Yom~g Sl;)led lh:)l Ihc~ ;ire nOl c;mceled. They ;~rc recorded :md in fronl of us jusl as though Ihev ~xcrc here Thc only ones Ih;~l h;ivc changed Iheir xoles ;)re thc ones Ilml ;)re here. Mr. Ik~rrcll slillcd thnt Ihis has lo be done as a Committee and they have alrcndv made their dccisiotls. Mr. Brox~n asked if x~c could nol s;)y thnt Ihcrc ;~rc txvelvc here and three Ihill have indicated in writing how lhe~ Fell nnd give that to thc Comn~issioners'.' Mr. Wcigel slated th;~t he feels tirol is Ihe xv;)v to do il. They have provided Ihcir rccommcndnlions in x~riling and ;)ccepled and the Bo;)rd cnn use Ih:il infornlnliOn ;I.i il may. You arc provitli)~g x~ h:)l has h;)ppcned in lhis meeting today. Dr. V;)rle5 ;~skcd Mr. ~V;)rd if hc would xvritc Ibis up such Ihal we had a vote. Iht Count)' Allorncv ~v;mlcd it done in public, x~c did it in public and three xxcre not here and here is the tally. Mr. W;~rd si;lied Ih;H he would do Ih;il ;ind b:tsed on that revision. Mr. 14arrcll and Mr. Rocllig have fifteen votes. Mr. Carroll arid Mr. hludgc have Ihirlcen votes. Mnurccn klcC;)~hv wilh nine votes and Cornelia Kre~gh xvilh cighl votes. I will ~ritc it up and send it Io Mr. Wcigcl For review prior to sending il lo Ms. Filson. For thc Record. lhe written xotcs of Messrs. FlallO. Hasson and GriEth nrc as folloxvs' -281 $- Mr. Flatlo volcd for Mr. llarrcll, Mr. Rocllig, Mr. Carroll, Mr. Mudgc and Maurccn McCarthy. Mr. Gri~th voted for Mr. Hancll. Mr. Rocllig, Mr. Carroll, Mr. Mudgc nnd Maurccn McCarthy. Mr. Hasson voted for Mr. tlarrcll. Mr. Rocllig. Mr. C;]rroll Mr. Mudgc and Cornelia Krcigh. Mr. Ward slated that hc would do Ihat and b;~scd on II~;~t rcvision, Mr. Harrcll and Mr. Rocllig Mr. Young slalcd thnl Dr. Varlcy fccls this is nol a good proccdurc to follo~v. As a pan of this rccord. [ want lo takc linc opponunily to shy thai I think lifts is an c~ccllcnl procedure and my rcasoning is Ih:it normally )our commillccs ;irc small and I would n~rcc Iii;il it is not a good ,.v;~y to ~tualc a colnlllitlcC. With ;i fifteen member board, we need lo Eive thc Counly Commissioners inpul of mcml~rs o[' our COIllllnlllil% ;llld ~vIHII ~C I]lillk Ih~ir abilities arc ;ind ~h:ll ~c fcc] IJlc¥ C;III conlribulC. Thc ~vors[ Ihin~ in thc ~xorld is for thc five, commissioners Io bc pickin~ mimes out of ;~ h:~l for this comtmltCC or pickin~ Ihcm polilically. Dr. Varlcy sl;llcd lhal Mr. Youn~ mistmdcrstood. Thc llOliOn Of otlr rcndcrin~ afl opinion Io thc Bo:~rd o~ Commissioners I ;~rcc it is a ~ood idea. When you arc looking for ~ood pcoolc who arc going to vohmlccr Ihcir lime on son~cthin~ that is nol Icrribly rc~vardin~ and have thc first hurdle to get through a public forum ~vhcrc eyeD'body lakes Ihcm ap;iH, is not ~ood and Ih;it is what I objccl lo. ] Ihou~ht ~vc had come up xvilh ;~ solution Io Ihal ~vhcrcby cvco'body could prixalcly render Ihcir opinion. ~ on thc public record rot ;mybody Io sec whal il is. but wc do not h:lvc to ~o through ;~ public discussion. I do a~rcc that ~vc should ~ct inpul. AD,IOURNMENT There bcin~ no fimhcr business, thc mcclin~ ;~djourncd ;~t 9:40 A.N1. Dr. Alan Varlcy. Ch;llrman MEMORANDUM TO: Pelican Bay Advisory Committee FROM: James P. Ward DATE: January 28. 199~ SUBJECT: Bollard light replacements Oaknlonl Lake Bank and Ridgcwood Drive As a part of thc approval of tile Division's Fiscal Year 1998 Budget there is included $42,800 for tile replaccmcnl of Ihe above noted bollard lights. There ;irc 114 bollard lights for replacement. Existing lighting is badly deteriorated due to ils' age, design, and vandalism. Thc existing lighting is conslrt~cled of a PVC type plaslic and painted. The materials along Ridgcwood were installed in tile carl,',' 1980's and Ibc lighting along Ihe Oakmont Lake bank was installed in tile mid to late 1980's. As a part of tile DMsion's programs to increase Iht quality of materials and services provided to thc residents, this )'car we included the amonnts noted abovc to replace thcsc materials with a more durable producl that will be less prone to vandalism, deterioration and which will be able to be better maintained as time passes. There ;irc a myriad of products, styles and materials that can be utilized for this kind of installalion which include both concrete and aluminunl bollards. For this installation, staff recommends the utiliz~qtion of concrete boll;~rds iihich ;irc relatively maintcn:mcc free. Additionally. Ihcsc bollards arc highly resistant IO abuse and inadvertent dam;igc and are consm~clcd lo minimize tile damage which may result from vandalisn~. Additionally. concrete bollards arc generally used along pedestrian areas, waikways and parks since they rcm:un relatively heat free. Aluminum bollards will generally be more susceptible to tile absorption of heat and accordingly, concrete bollards tend Io expand tile functionality of their use in a more aesthetic and functional site design. In reviewing thc various lighting options available, there ;ire a uumbcr of ~nanufaclurcrs which can suppl.,,' this kind of lighting, however the cost of Ibc lighting varies widely among different vendors without significant changes in Ihe design characteristics of the bollard lighls. Accordingly. pricing was a kc)' consideration in tile review of tile materials and a particular linc of lights marketed locally in Naples bb' Stonclight Corporation and manur;iclttrcd locally by tile D. C. Kerckhoff Company provides both tile aesthetic and fimctional characteristics Ih:it staff believes will be beneficial lo file commtlnilv. Attached to this mcmorandtnn ;is Exhibil A is a recommended bollard style light for your considcration Fixtures come equipped with a 13 walt fluorescent lamps which provide thc equivalent of 75 walls of incandescent light. This lamp will provide significantly belier lighting along tile pathwa.,,s. As a part of Ibc installation, staff is also recommending Ihat tile fixlnrc include a ceramic tile reset into the post which will carry tile Pelican Bay logo for tile community Ir yot, desire. Iht brochures for thc oilier matcrials that xvc rcvicxvcd are available in the office and please foci free to stop by and review this material. Addilionally. on tile day of the meeting thc rccommcndccl choice will bc available lo sec at Hammock Oak Park. al our meeting entrance. Please feel free to stop by before tile mcctiug to look ;it these lights. Thank you and if you have any qt,cslions relative to this matter, please Ici n~e know. Pelican Bay Services Division Operations Quarterly Report October - December 1997 %Vaft'r M;tnagcfncnl Exotic Rcmov.'d - Thc exotic removal was completed m ss.'stems I and II in November. As a result of thc massivc amount of Brazilian Pepper removed in front of Thc Hcron, approval was granted by thc Board for additional clcanng and v, ctland plantings which was performed in November and December. The ama looks inuch better, though some of thc residents still cxpcct this area to look more formally landscaped particularly with larger materials, but when tile plants installed grow it should dcvclop into a nice 'nctland area. In some of tile other areas cleared of exotics thc under stop,.' fohage has continued ~.o fill in and ts looking better Paving - Thc pax tng budgeted for s.xstcms I and Il ~as complclcd in Dcccmbcr ~hilc thc Clam Bar ~as being tonex'lied Oakmont Lake bank sidc~alk, origin;ally scheduled to bc complclcd at the same time. has bccn scheduled for Fcbm;irv Corn reunify,' Bt':mfific;Itiml lrrig;tti.n - In order to isolate tile flex, er beds from thc turf upgrades to tile zone controls was complete..t in thc early part of October. Also the inslallalion of baHcr%' operated timers in the :ingle family cul-de- sacs. budgeted for FY98. was complcled with installalion of some new valves and control modules. ReplantingPr.~ram-The fi~llannnalpl;mlingof petunias and gcr;miums wascon;plctcdinOctobcr Mainl', duc to x~cather conditions, thc geraniums pi;rated at the cntranccs experienced some fungus problems and x~crc changed to begonias. Street Sign.,i - The signs at Pclic;m Bav Bird and Oakmont Park~vav wcrc installed for thc four way stop at that intersection. Liuhfint. Bollards - Inform:men on thc bolhlrd lighting for the Oakmonl Lake Bank and Ridgc'n'ood inlcrscctions has bccn collected and recommended fixture will bc presented to the Board for their rcvmxv An~tr;dian Pine Rcm.v;ll A peri,on of thc Australian Pmcs v, crc removed from thc area sottth of thc CI:I~I Bar Be:ich Faed~ls. The remaining pines nlong tile chlllC llorlh of the Clam Bar xxcrc ctlt doxvn in Jantl:_lD. PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION CLAM BAY RESTORATION FUND DECEMBER 31, 1997 F.Y. 1997 F.Y. 1998 Total Exp. Dec. 1997 Budget Budget Budget To Date Balance Expcn.~cs EXPENDITURES Environmental Consult. Akcrman. Scntcrfitt. ct. al. $ 153.168 $ 54.532 $ 207,700 $ 201.683 $ 6.017 $ 12.783 Lewis Environmental Scrx'. $ 71.461) $ 7.540 $ 79,000 $ 77.482 $ 1.518 $ 6.022 Tackncy & Associates $ 54.184 $ 32.316 $ 86,500 $ 75.326 $ 11.174 $ 9.568 Wilson. Miller. et. al. $ 47.112 $ 42.888 $ 90,000 $ 57.335 $ 32.665 $ 5.180 Dr. Samuel Snedckcr $ 7.001 $ 20.599 $ 27,600 $ 9.319 $ 18.281 $ Hilburn Hilstad $ 10.550 $ 38.550 $ 49,100 $ 10.550 $ 38.550 $ Others $ 18.524 $ 121.294 $ 130,818 $ 21.118 $ 118.700 5~ Sub-Total $ 361.999 $ 317.719 $ 670,718 $ 452.812 $ 226.906 $ 33.552 Capital Outlay Improvements General $ 15.459 $ 1.361.400 $1,376,859 $ 15.459 $ 1.361.400 $ Other Machinery& Equip. $ 2.827 $ $ 2,827 $ 2.827 $ $ Sub-Total $ 18.286 $ 1.361.4¢),) $1,370,686 $ 18.286 $ 1.361.400 $ Other Fees & Charges Tax Collector $ 10.214 $ 20.000 $ 30,214 $ 13.844 $ 16.370 $ 6.448 Propcr~y Appraiser $ $ 13.400 $ 13,400 $ 8.(,37 $ 4.763 $ 8.637 Revenue Rcscrx'c $ $ 23.600 $ 23.600 $ $ 23.60~) $ Sub-Total $ 10.214 $ 57.000 $ 67,214 $ 22.481 $ 44.733 $ 15.085 TOTALAPPROPRLATIONS I$ 39o.499 I$ 1.736.119 ]$ 2.126.618 I$ 493.578 ]~ 1.633.040 l$ 48.,,37 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - DECEMBER SERVICES DATE INV. NO. AMOUNT THRU Lo,vis Environmental 01/06/98 98002 $ 1.250.00 12/31/97 Akcrman. Scntcrfitt 01/15/98 2129747 $ 8.030.72 12/31/97 Hilburn Hillestad 12/29/97 12/29/97 $ 29.700.00 12/31/97 Suboceanic 01/09/98 96.15-2 $ 1.400.00 01/09/98 Tackncy & Associates 11/20/97 572 $ 9.567.87 11/19/97 WMB&P 12/17/97 8255 $ 2.466.75 I !/28/97 WMB&P 01/09/98 8660 $ 1.383.50 12/26/97 TOTAL INVOICES $ 53.798.84 1Gill l riff Collier County Govt. Complex Bldg. - J 3301 Tamiami Trail East. Naples, FL 34112 Telephone (AC 941) 774-4434 January 6, 1998 Mr. James Ward Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive Suite 605 Naples, FL 34108 Dear Mr. Ward: Attached please find a copy ofthe December monthly statistics for Pelican Bay, North Naples road patrol, S.E.T. Team, North Naples Community Service deputies report, as well as a break down for calls for service specific to Pelican Bay. Respectfully submitted; cc: Pelican Bay file MI.I)/jgm C ' O FFIC E'. ,WPWIN~.W PDOC g COR RES PO'IXJI,A?'.' WARD I.T~ , UNIFORM D IVI S ION MONTHLY STAT REPORT MONTH OF: DECEMBER 1997 DIS~I~ O~PELICA/~Y TOTAL ACTIVITIES 1307 FELONY ARRESTS 00 BAKER ACT O0 WRITERS 33 MISD ARRESTS 01 MYERS ACTS ACCIDENTS WORK 14 WARR. ARRESTS 00 *SIG 41R 44~ ACCIDENT ASSIST 06 ARREST ASSIST 05 *SIG 4lB 34- *F. I. REPORTS 00 *TRAFFIC CITS 25 CITY CALLS 01 *INTELL. REPORTS 00 *TRFC. WARNINGS 48 BACK-UP CLS 29 *COMM POL. FORMS 01 *PARKING CITS. 19 SCHOL XING AID OTHER AGENCY 13 N.T.A.'S 01 TRFFC STOPS 48 SPECIAL ASSIGN 01 FALSE ALARMS 155 S.I. TOTAL 29C ******************************************************************************* ******************************************************************************* SIGNATURE/ID# of Substation Commander Date iii I ii III IIIIIIIII IIII II I I I ............. """" ' .......... I Collier County Sherif~'s O~£ice Crimes by Day o~ Week From ~0/1G/97 through 11/15/9'7 For Grid ~201 PELICAN BAY AREA Class ~ l~ ~i,:~ion ~un Mon '~ue~ Wed Thur Fri :~at total ~}URGLARY OF DWI~LLING 0 I 0 ~R [M ~NAI. M I~CH IEF 0 0 0 I 0 0 1 GRAND 'rH~F'~ ALI. 0 0 % 1 0 0 0 Ll]'.~'r/~TOLI{N PROPi~I¥~Y 0 0 0 MI:]SING Pi~RSON~ 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 pl.]'~'rY THI~FT ALL 0 0 0 0 R~]BBERY UNARMED 0 0 0 0 0 GUSPKC ~OUS [NC I DIdN't:3 0 0 0 0 TRAFFIC ACC I DI~NT 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 UTT,~R FORGED 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Grand Total: 0 2 I 4 G 2 1 1(~ 16G1 Collier County Sheriff's Office Dispatches by Day o4 Week From 10/16/97 through 11/15/97 For Grid 1201 PELICAN BAY AREA Dispatch Dispatch Type Sun Mort Tues Wed Thur Fri Sa~ To~al AIIANDONED V~H[CLE 0 0 · 0 0 0 1 ACC~D~N'r 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ALARM 2G 25 21 31 16 23 32 174 AMBULANCE 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 2 CRIMINAL M ~SCH I~F 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 FIRE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 HIGHWAY OBGTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 M[GG[NG PERGON 0 0 I · 0 0 I 2 N~)[~E C~MPLA~NT 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 1 N~)'r[FY PI~I~;I)N/WI~LFARE CHI~ i 0 0 0 0 0 PR~)WL~R 0 0 0 RI.:CK I.I...,.~ DR [VER 0 0 I 0 0 1 0 2 REQIJK:;'r HELP/N~)N-I~MERGKNC 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~;U:~P[C[I)U:~ BOAT 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~;U:;P[C[I)U:; {NC[DIdN't 0 ~U:~P[CIOUS P~{R~ON 0 2 0 i 0 0 0 ~]I]:~P[C[OU:~ VI.:HICLE 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 2 UNVI.:R [F [ED 911 2 2 5 4 0 1 Vi{R [FY V[N 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 2 Grand Total: 31 33 32 41 1'3 27 42 225 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY. FEBRUARY fi, 1998 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER. 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST. EAST NAPLES. FLORIDA: NOTE:ANY PERSON WHO DECIDED TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICtt RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. I. ROLL CALL BY CLERK 2. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 18, 1997 and January 8. 1998 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: 5. BCC REPORT i-'; 6. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT ' " .~ 7. ADVERTISED PUBLIC ttEARINGS: A. Petition No. V-97-15. Kenneth D. Goodman. representing Lana S. Chadwick. requesting an 0.5 foot after- the-fact variance from the required 30 foot s~de yard setback for the principal structure, along the south property line to 29.5 feet; a 4.0 foot after-the-fact variance from the required 30 foot side yard setback for an accessory structure, along the south property line to 26 feet; a 13.3 foot variance from the required 30 foot side yard setback for a tennis court along the north property line, to 16.7 feet; and a 2.0 foot after.the.fact variance from the required structure-to-structure setback of i0 feet for the separation between the principal structure and a tennis court, to 8 feet for property located at 118 Cajeput Drive, further described as Lot 14, Block L. Pine Ridge Extension. (Coordinator: Fred Reischl) B. Petition No. V-97-16. Karen K. Bishop of Project Management Services, Inc., representing Jeffrey Piipponen. requesting a 2 foot variance to the required height for fences from 6 tbot to 8 foot for property known as Longshore Lakes PUD. in Section 20, Township 48 South. Range 26 East. (Coordinator: Chahram Badamtchian) ..,,, ~ ~ k ~ancock / Constant Jne_ , C. Petition No. V-97-17. Daniel and Margaret Kelly requesting a 22.9 foot alter-the-fact variance from the required side yard sethack of 30 feet to 7.1 feet for property located at 6831 Sandalwood Lane. further described as the west 150 feet of Tract 37. Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 35. (Coordinator: Ray Bellows) D. Petition No. ST-97-2. For Special Treatment Development Permit to allow constn~ction of a commercial office park on property zoned C. I a portion of which has a Special Treatment (ST) Overlay. in Section 12, Township 49 South. Range 25 East. Collier County Florida. (Coordinator: Steve Lenberger) E. Petition No. PUD-87-31(3), Timothy W. Ferguson and Dominic Gadaleta representing SJG Land Trust, requesting a rezone from "PUD" to "PUD" for the Planned Unit Development known as Gadaleta, having the effect of amending the Gadaleta PUD in response to requirements of Section 2.7.3.4 of the [,and Dcvelopmcnt Code, Resolution 97-134, for property located on the west side of Old Tamiami Trail North/Old U.S. 41 North (C.R. 867) and immediately contiguous the Lee County boundary line in Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. Collier County, Florida, containing 19.3 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Ron Nine) (Continued from the meeting of January 15, 1998) F. Petition No. PUD.84-7(6), George l,. Varnadoe of Young, vanAssendcrp & Varnadoe. P.A. representing DY Associates Joinl Venture. a Florida General Partnership, for a rezone from "PUD" Planned Unit Development and "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development, having the effect of amending the Fiddler's Creek portion of the Marco Shores PUD and adding 1,385 acres thereto while holding constant the currently authorized number of dwelling units, namely 6,000 for the fiddler's Creek portion of the Marco Shores PUD lying in Sections 13, 14. 15.22.23 and 24, Township 51 South, Range 26 East and Sections 18. 19 and 29, Township 51 South, Range 27 East. Collier County, Florida. consisting of 3.763.99 acres, more or [ess. (Coordinator: Ron Nine) (Companion Item DOA-97.3) (Continued from the meeting of January 15, 1997) G. Petition No. DOA-97.3, George L. Vamadoe of Young, vanAssenderp & Vamadoe. P.A.. representing DY Associates Joint Venture, a Florida General Partnership, for an amendment to the Marco Shores/Fiddler's Creek Development Order 84-3. as amended for the purpose of adding 1,385 acres to the Fiddler's Creek portion of said development order, and companion Planned Unit Development zoning regulation, and to adopt a new Master Plan for said added area while leaving constant the currently authorized number of dwelling umts, namely 6,000 for the Fiddler's Creek portion of Marco Shores, said additional land area is located m Section 18. 19 and 29, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Ron Nine)(Companion Item PUD-84-7(6) (Continued from the meeting of January 15, 1997) Il. l'etmon No. PSP-97-17. Blair A. Foley. P.E.. of Coastal Engineering Consultants. Inc.. representing George Vukobratovtch of Welsh Companies, requesting Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval for Willow Park Commercial Subdivision, located on Airport-Pulling road (C.R. 31). directly so';~th of Princess Park, in Secnon 1. Township 49 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 11.36 acres. (Coordinator: Ron Nine) (Continued Indefinite) 1. Petition No. PUD-82-33(1), Michael R. Fernandez, AICP. of Planning Development Incorporated, representing ttang Manufacturing Corporation. requesting a rezone from PUD to PUD known as "Wiggins Bay" for the purposes of eliminating commercial land uses on commercially designated tract and replacing same with a seven (7) story residential building(s) containing 56 dwelling units for property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Vanderbilt Drive and Wiggins Pass Road, in Section 16, Township 48 South. Range 25 East, Collier County. Florida. consisting of 148.26 acres. (Coordinator: Ron Nine) J. Petition No. PUD-90-36(I), Dwight Nadeau of MeAnly Engineering and Design, Inc.. representing Colonial Equities, Inc.. requesting a rezone from PUD to PUD. for the Planned Unit Development known as Saddlebrook Village having the effect of repealing and readopting a new PUD Document and Master Plan in response to action taken pursuant to Section 2.7.3.4 (Sunsetting). Resolution No. , for property located on the north side of the intersection of Radio Road and Davis Boulevard, lying south of Interstate 75. in Section 34. Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 33.79 acres. (Coordinator: Ron Nine) 2 K. Petition No. R-97-10. Michael R. Fernandez. AICP, of Planning Development Incorporated. representing James W. Tobin. Fire Chief, as representative for North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District requesting a rezone from "A" Agriculture to "PS" Public Service for the development of a fire station for property located south of Pine Ridge Road, approximately ~h mile west of 1-75, in Section 18. Township 49 South. l~ange 26 East, Collier County. Florida. consisting of 4.28 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) L. Petition No. R-97.11, Dwight Nadeau of MeAnly Engineering and Design, Inc.. representing .lames R. Colosimo, Trustee of Ultimate Land Trust, requesting a rezone from "PUD" Planned Unit Development to "A" Rural Agricultural with an "MHO" overlay for property located on the north and south sides of lmmokalee Road (C.R. 846), in Sections 17, 20, 29 and 30, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. Collier County, Florida, consisting of 1,374.09 acres. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) M. Petition No. CP-97-3, proposed adoption of text amendment to the Growth Management Plan pertaining to Fiddler's Creek portion of the Marco Shores DRI (Adoption Hearing). (Coordinator: Wayne Arnold) 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 1 I. ADJOURN 2/5/98 CCPC AGENDA/md 3 December 18, 1997 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida, December 18, 1997 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:31 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Michael A. Davis Michael J. Bru~t Michael Pedone Gary Wrage Russell Priddy Russell A. Budd Edward J. Oates ABSENT: Richard Nelson Donald J. York ALSO PRESENT: Marjorie M. Student, Assistant County Attorney Ron Nino, Planning Services Bob Mulhere, Current Planning Manager Page 1 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY. DECEMBER 18, 1997 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAM] TRAIL EAST, EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE:ANY PERSON WHO DECIDED TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCF. F. DINGS IS MADE, WH/CH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMlvHSSIONERS. 1. ROLL CALL BY CLERK 2. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 6, 1997 and November 13, 1997 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: 5. BCC REPORT 6. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 7. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Petition No. BD-97-26, Mile~ L. Scofiekk representing Donald W. Polen requesting approval to cotmruct a boathouse over a proposed 16 foot boat dock and boat lift for property located at 260 Cbann~el Drive, further ckscribed as Lot 27, Block C, Counefs Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit No. 1. (Coordinator: Fred P, eischl) B. Petition No. PUD-97-10, William L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover Planning Shoppe representing Richard I. Clesen of F. Clesen & Sons, Inc., requesting a rezone from 'A' and "MST' to "PUD' planned Unit Development to be known as Bay West Villas for 200 dwelling units, located on the north side of kamokalee Road (C.R. 846), 7/8 mile west of C.1L 951, in Section 22, Tow~hip 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. consisting of 28.65 acres, more or leas. (Coordinator:. Ray Bellows) C. Petition No. CU-97-24, William L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover phnnlng Shoppe and Beau Keene. P.E., representing Richard and Teresa Yahl, requesting Conditional Use '2' of the ~A' zoning district for mulching and horticultural recycling for property located on the south side of Washbttm Avenue S.W., approximately 'A mile north of Alligator Alley (S.R. 84), in Section 31, Town~hip 49 south, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of $.19 acres, more or less. (Coordit~r:. Susan Murray) · D. Petition No. SV-97-2, Wiley M. Pa~ker of P~tkc'r/lvludgetttSmith A~hitects, r~pr~sentmg Lely Developing. Corporation on behatt' of Edison Community College, r~questing a vn~'/ance from the r~lxtir~nts , Section 2.5.5.2.3.12 of the LDC for a 20 foot high double-faced off-pl;~dses directional sign with a col: ar~ of 72 squa~ feet located at the intersection of l. sle of C.~pfi Road (C.R. 951) and Lely Cultm~ right.of-way, in Section 22, Township 50 South, P,~nge 26 East. (Coordinator: ~ Badamtchi~n) E. Petition No. R-97-8, Co~ty D~velopment & Environmental Sersdce~ Division, ~tin$ the Coili County Bo~'d of County Commissioners, reques~ng a r~on¢ fi~m "PUD" Phnned Unit Development "A" Agricultural for the Vincentian Resid~ce PUD loc~ted on the south side of U.S. 41 East and on the side of Southwest Bouleva~t, in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florae consisting of 30.7 acres. (Coordlnnmr:. Chahram Ba~) F. Petition No. PSP-97-16, WCI Cor~utmities, L.P., reqm:sting Preliminary Subdivision Prat approval f Pelica~ Marsh East, located on the west side of Ah'pon. Pulling Road {'C.R. 31) between Van&-rbilt Beat Road (C.R. 1~62) and lmmokalee Road (C.P,= 846), in Section 25 and 36, Township 48 South, l~ge 25 E~ consisting of 768.1 acres. (Coordinntoc Ron Nino) G. Petition No.'PUD-97-15, Blair A. Foley, P.E., of Coa.stnl Engineering Cons~'~mts, Inc., r~l~sen~ George Vukobratovich, Trustee, requesting a n:~.one fi~m "CF" Comm,.mity Facility to "PUD' Plan~ed Us Development for a mixed commercial land use development strategy in a project titled Willow Park f property located on the east side of Ah'pon-Pulling Road south of Lone Oak Boulevard and immt~liate contiguous property known as Princc~s Pa~k in Section I, Town.ship 49 South, Rtuge 25 Ea~ Cella County, Florid~ contsining 1 !.35 acres, mom or less. (coordln~tor: Ron Nino) (Contin~.d f~m t meeting of December 4, 1997) H. Petition No. DOA-97-3, George L. V~u~l~e of Young, v~nAs.~'nd~ & V~trnadoe. P.A., rc-pr~enri~g Associates Joint Venrttr~, a Florida General Pa.,'tnership, for an amendment to the Ma.r~o Shor~s/Fiddle Creek Development Order 84-3, ~s amended for the purpose of adchng 1,385 acres to the Fiddler's Crc portion of said development order, and con~nnlon Phnned Unit Development zoning r~,~ation, and adopt a new Master Ph~n for said ~lded a~a while leaving constant the ctu,~utly autt~rized number dwelling units, nan~ly 6,000 for the Fiddleffs Creek portion of Ma~o Shor~s, said addition,ti located in Section 18, 19 and 29, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Ron Nino) (Companion Item PUD-84-?(6) (Continued to Janu,xry 15, 1998) I. Petition No. PUD-g4-7(6), George L. Vtmsdoe of Young, va~Ass~ndet'p & Vsm~doe, P.A., r~n'~senti DY Associates Joint Ventt~e, a Florida General Partnership, for a re'.~one fi'om "PUD' Planned U Development and "A" Rttml Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development, having the effect amending the Fiddler's Creek pomon of the M~'co Shor~ PUD and adding 1,355 acr~ the~to wh holding constant the cxu'~ntly authoriz~ number of dwelling uni~ nnm¢ly 6,000 for the fiddl~s Crc portion of the Ma~co S'nor~s PUD lying in Sections 13, 14, 15, 22, 2.3 and 24, Town, h~ 51 South, Range E~st and Sections lg, 19 and 29, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting 3,763.99 acres, mor~ or less. (Coordlnsmr: Ron Nino) (Companion It~n DOA-97-3) (Continued ganua~'y 15, 1998) 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 11. ADJOURN i 2/I S/97 CCPC AGENdA/md 2 December 18, 1997 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Call this meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission to order. Begin by calling the roll. Mr. Priddy? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Budd? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bruet? COMMISSIONER BRUET: Present. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Davis, here. Mr. York is excused. Mr. Oates? COMMISSIONER OATES: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Pedone? COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Wrage? COMMISSIONER WRAGE: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Addenda to the agenda, we have items H and I that show a -- a request of continuance to Janua~z 15th, and i believe we also do for item C, Mr. Mulhere? MR. MULHERE: Actually, B and C. I have here a letter from Mr. Hoover requesting an indefinite continuance on item B, PUD-97-10 -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Uh-huh. MR. MULHERE: -- and item C, he also -- we have a written request for a continuance. I believe the request is until the second meeting in January and I don't know if that will require readvertising, but the -- the reason for that request is so that the -- I believe on January 6th there's a discussion relative to the -- from the landfill siting committee and that may have an impact on this request and so tentatively, I would say he would like to have this rescheduled -- reheard -- or heard on the second meeting in January. If that changes, of course, we'll readvertise it. (At this time, Mr. Russell A. Budd entered the boardroom.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: So we would need a motion to continue item B indefinitely, and items C0 H and i until our meeting of Janua~ !5th. COFIMISSIONER BRUET: So moved, Mr. Chairman. COMMISSIONER OATES: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion by Mr. Bruet, seconded by Mr. Oates. Discussion on that motion? All those in favor,' signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That carries unanimously. We have two sets of minutes up for approval today. COMMISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I move for both sets of approval. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Second. COMMISSIONER OATES: Move both sets, excuse me. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion of approval of both sets of minutes by Mr. Oates, seconded by Mr. Bruet. Discussion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? Page 2 December iS, 1997 (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. And Mr. Budd has joined US. Any Planning Commission absences? COMMISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, in view of the fact that we have lost Mr. Nelson, I would -- this is not an absence, obviously, exactly, but I would move that we nominate Don York to be our new secretary. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I'll second that. COMMISSIONER WRAGE: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. With the announcement -- I handed out a letter and have given you, Mr. Mulhere, a copy of a letter from Mr. Nelson resigning from the Collier County Planning Commissic~ with his appointment to the Marco Island planning Commission and -- ,knd we also are glad to see that they had the wisdom to elect him chairman of their group. I'm sure he'll do a great job down there, and with that information, there's a -- and his replacement needed for secreta~;, a motion by Mr. Oates, seconded by Mr. Pedone to elect Don York as our secretary. Any discussion on that motion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That carries unanimously. COMMISSIONER OATES: Since he's the only one not here, he got elected. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That will teach him to not show up, won't it? Mr. Mulhere, anything in the way of a BCC report? -MR. MULHERE: Yes, sir. I did want to let the commission know that the board's final LDC hearing was last evening. Everything was approved as forwarded by the Planning Commission, with the exception of the landscape architect signature and seal issue, which the board approved the recommendation of staff, which was to strike through the words, be prepared by, so that it now reads that -- that the plans for SDP require the signature and seal of a landscape arcnitecz. Of course, they could be prepared by another individual under the direction of a landscape architect. Whereas, the Planning Commission, and I don't know if all of you were here at the second Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission's recommendation tc the board by a four to three vote was to return the language to the way that the code read prior to October of 1996, which also required the signature and seal of a landscape architect, but made specific reference to the exemptions in the statutes. Didn't clarify those exemptions, but did make reference to them. The board had a lengthy discussion at both of their meetings and many members of the public on both sides of the issue spoke, and after some deliberation, they recommended by a four to one 'vote to adopt the staff's recommendation. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Who was the dissenting vote? MR. MULHERE: Commissioner Constantine. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: All right. Oh, a good announcement to make. Page 3 I I I I U! I II II IIII I I III III III I I I "' '""' "' "'"' ......... December 18, 1997 Mr. Mulhere sits with us every -- twice a month with the Planning Commission and helps us and I think it's important that we recognize that just recently he was recognized on Marco Island as Naples Daily News' Marco Island citizen of the year for all his hard work down there, so congratulations to you and we're proud of you. MR. MULHERE: It was a great honor and a huge surprise. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Well deserved. COMMISSIONER WRAGE: Did he run for an office down there? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: No, no -- MR. MULHERE: I can't afford to. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- just a lot of good hard work on Marco Island. COMMISSIONER OATES: Congratulations, Bob. MR. MULHERE: Thank you. CHAIRPUkN DAVIS: And with that, we'll come to our first advertised public hearing, Petition BD-97-26 presented by Mr. Reisch!. I'd ask everyone here today that may want to speak on this petition to please stand and raise your right hand so the court reporter may swear you in. (Speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Before you begin, Mr. Reischl, in the way of another atta boy, we've got a few members of Rotary and past members of Rotary sitting up here, and Mr. Reischl was recently selected as a group study exchange team member to Japan. He's sponsored by the Naples Downtown Club and we're looking forward to his participation and we thank you for your -- for your involvement, Fred. HR. REISCHL: Thanks. -COMMISSIONER OATES: Congratulations, Fred. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And with that, now you can go to work. MR. MULHERE: I'll just -- we've authorized him to be away from work. He just has to bring a present back from Jal~:~n for us. COMMISSIONER OATES: A geisha girl. COMMISSIONER BRUET: I was gonna say, I won't ask what it is. MR. REISCHL: I've already been notified that That's been a condition of my leave getting signed. Fred Reischl, Planning Services. This is a request for a boathouse, not a boat dock, in the Vanderbilt Beach -- Conner's Vanderbilt Beach area. It's a 16 foot by 32 foot boathouse, that with the walkway, the farthest protrusion of the boathouse is 18 feet. The farthest protrusion of the dock is 20 feet. On this 100 foot canal, if this was just a dock, it wouldn't even have to come before you as a boat dock extension. It would have been a building permit issue. However, with the change in the Land Development Code, the -- any boathouse comes before you for approval. This does meet the criteria -- the petitioner states that the construction will meet the special boathouse criteria, the roofing material. The side setback, as you can see on the diagram, is -- meets code, and I passed out the supplement, the photos, you can see that there already are several other boathouses along the same canal, and staff recommends approval. Page 4 .... ~t I I IIII II II I I II III I II December 18, 1997 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any questions? MR. REISCHL: Oh, I'm sorrt, I did receive a phone call requesting information, but no objection and no -- nothing else. COMMISSIONER BRUET: No -- no view issues, no concerns from adjacent neighbors? MR. REISCHL: None had been expressed to me, just a request for -- a gentleman asked me to fax the diagrams. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Petition -- Miss Student? MS. STUDENT: Mr. Chairman, I was just gonna add that the representative of the petitioner drew to my attention, he thought there were people here on this item that were not sworn, so if people come up, I think they need to announce whether or not they were sworn. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: We'll do that. COMMISSIONER OATES: This man was not. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Petitioner, did you have something to add? MR. SCOFIELD: Just -- just a few quick things. Miles Scofieid, for the record, representing the petitioner. This is a -- this boathouse is of minimal dimensions, as Fred already told you. It's a flat roof. The -- I don't know if you can see in your pictures there, but I'm going to bring up a couple of pictures showing his house and the canal and there are five other boathouses on this canal. This shows down the canal, the other boathouses and the next door neighbor, and this is the neighbor directly adjacent to him just on the west side. These -- there were three lots here on this -- on the end of Channel Drive. If you can see this, what I put right here in red, this is the petitioner's lot. He's two lots away from the end, and ~he other boat -- there's five other boathouses including -- the neighbor's makes six, but the neighbor's boathouse is indented into the lot. There were boat slips on these lots. My client filled in his boat slip. The pictures there I handed out show the existing boat slip on -- well, it shows on both sides of his house. One has a boathouse on it with a roof and a deck above it. My client is just gonna put a flat roof that -- the bottom floor of his house shows a flat roof and that's what he's gonna match up with and it's only 11 feet. It's not very high up off the seawall, and that's -- that's it. If you have any questions, I'd be glad to answer them. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions of Mr. Scofield? COMMISSIONER BRUET: Eleven feet in height to the top? MR. SCOFIELD: Uh-huh. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Scofield. MR. SCOFIELD: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: This is a public hearing. If uhere are additional speakers that would like to come up and speak, please do SO. Sir, if you want to speak, come up to the podium and we're going to ask the court reporter to swear you in, if you'd be kind enough to raise your right hand. (Speaker was sworn.) Page 5 December 18, 1997 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And if you could state your name for the record, sir. MR. JOHNSON: My name is George Johnson. I live at 240 Channel Drive and I ask you not to approve the roof on this boat dock. The boat dock, of course, is fine. One thing I'd like to note, the letter that was sent out to the adjoining neighbors there is a little misleading. They specify a 16 foot boat dock, and upon seeing the plans, it's a 32 foot boat dock, and the reason I ask you not to approve the roof on this, if I may, I've got some photos showing what would happen to the view from my house. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Ail right. MR. JOHNSON: So that roof would just -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: If you could go back to the microphone so we can all hear you. MR. JOHNSON: The roof would block my view off toward the main channel, and of course, anything we lose in view in that particular area, obvio~sly is going to affec~ property values. if you notice the photos there, those are the boats and boat docks across the street and east toward the main -- main channel there. So again, I ask you not to block our view and do not approve the roof on this boat dock. CHAIR/~AN DAVIS: Yeah, Mr. Pedone? COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Mr. Johnson, in this picture here, is that your house next door with the boat in it with the boathouse? MR. JOHNSON: Yes, it is. Now, my home was buil~ ten years ago, and at that point in time, you could only go out into the canal five feet, which that meets the code. I have a boat slip there. That is connected to my home. That is part of my home. That is just not a separate structure out in the canal. COMMISSIONER PEDO~;E: But if somebody builds on the lot adjacent to you that is now empty, would his view be ruined by your boathouse? MR. JOF2qSON: Perhaps, depending on the structure that he put up. ~;ow, zhose other photos, what i -- now, this, of course, is permissible, but how many things can we do that are permissible? if you look aa one of the photos I have up there, the driveway. Now, that is my home next door. This -- excuse me -- oh, he was waving and I was trying to figure out what he was -- whether it was at me or not. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Go ahead. MR. JOHNSON: And he got permission from the county to put his driveway five feet across the property line on both his neighbors' property and there really was no call for this. So again, I ask you to please not approve the roof. Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Johnson. Are there additional speakers? Mr. Scofield, did you want to come back up? MR. SCOFIELD: Yeah, just quickly. I think this picture by Mr. Reischl that he handed to you is the best picture there that shows the view of the whole canal, the neighbor's. He has a flat roof also with about a four foot high fence around it which is a deck area, but it Page 6 16G1 December 18, 1997 does show the other boathouses and they are quite common in this area. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Thank you. Additional speakers on this topic? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Mr. Chairman -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I move we approve Petition BD-97-26 subject to the staff's stipulations. COMMISSIONER WRAGE: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion of approval by Mr. Oates, seconded by Wrage. Discussion on the motion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. COMMISSIONER OATES: Mr. Mulhere0 should we keep B, C, H and I or MR. MULHERE: We'll reissue them. COMMISSIONER OATES: Okay. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Petition SV-97-2. Mr. Badamtchian? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Good morning, commissioners, Chahram Badamtchian -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: If I could -- this is a sign variance. 2'd ask all those present here today that are going to speak on this petition to please stand and raise your right hand so that you may be sworn by the court reporter. (Speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And I am going to recuse myself on this petition since I make my living selling signs and I have had some conversations with the people at Edison Community College about the sign thaz's before us today. So wizh that, I'll pass the gavel over to our vice chairman, Mr. Bruet. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chahram? .MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Mr. Parker representing Lely Development Corporation on behalf of Edison Community College is requesting zhis variance in order to erect an off-premises pole sign. This land for the college was donated by Lely and they also donate -- granted an easement along 951 for a Dole sign. However, our Land Development Code does not provide for that. According to our Land Development Code, they could have two one-sided directional signs, and this variance is for them to -- to enable them to build one pole sign 20 feet high, 72 feet -- square feez in area. Staff reviewed this petition and recommends approval of ~his petition. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Any further questions for staff? If not, if the petitioner would like to address the board. MR. PARKER: Good morning. Wiley Parker; Parker, Mudgett, Smith Architects. We are representing the college. We were the architects for the design of this particular sign. We just ask your favorable consideration of it. It's important to the college to have a presence Page 7 December 18, 1997 out on this, what is a very prominent roadway and we'd ask your favorable consideration. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Certainly in this case, it appears to be certainly appropriate. Any further questions for the petitioner? If not, the hearing is closed. Gentlemen, any discussion? COMMISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I move we submit to the BZA a recommendation of approval of SB-97-2. COMMISSIONER BUDD: Second. COMMISSIONER BRUET: There's a motion to approve by Mr. Oates, seconded by Mr. Budd. All those in favor? Opposed? (No response.) COMMISSIONER BRUET: Motion carries. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That brings us to petition R-97-8. COMMISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I need to know if the Bishop from Venice is gonna come down and zap us if we vote -- COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Do we have to worry about lightning strikes? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: No, I'm sure we're just fine. COMMISSIONER ?~RAGE: Some of us are exempt. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Let's see. We need everyone on this petition also to please stand and raise your right hands so that you may be sworn in by the court reporter. (Speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Badamtchian? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Chahram Badamtchian from Planning Services staff. Collier County Land Development Code requires all PUDs not at least partially developed within five years to go back to the Board of County Commissioners for review, and this PUD was amended in 1991 and it has not been developed. It's a vacant piece of land. On March 18, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners reviewed this PUD and recommended that the applicant amend the PUD within six months. The applicants failed to do that. Therefore, staff's recommendation is to rezone this to its original zoning, which was agricultural. However, in the past couple of weeks, the applicant has contacted us and has requested another six to nine month extension. They are preparing an amendment for this PUD and staff has no problem with this request. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Chahram, the board, in most cases, the BCC, I mean, two years is what they've been looking at on a lot of these, right? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: If there are no problems with the PUD, no problems to development standards, they grant them a two year extension. If there are problems, they give them six months to amend it. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Uh-huh. MIR. BADAMTCHIAN: And in this case, they gave them six months. Page 8 II I I III II III III IIIIII I II'II I IIII iiiii 16G1 December 18, 1997 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I see. So that -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: However, with the Catholic church being a large organization, we sent them two letters and apparently they were lost or something. They did not receive them in time. COMMISSIONER OATES: That's the same as if you pray to them too, the same thing happens, it gets waylaid. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Did -- did the petitioner's representative -- or actually, a representative of the church, I guess, want to come forward and speak to us? MR. STEWART: Yes, I find the case very appropriate for this time of year. Good morning, commissioners, Greg Stewart, for the record, Stewart and Associates, Fort Myers, Florida. You're right, there were some miscommunications in the notifications. They got lost. I think it was routed through the Vatican Museum or something. I -- I don't know what happened, but we were notified late in the game, this past November. I did speak with staff. I informed them this past year we've been working on our district permit. Because of the date and nature of the original zoning and the original master plan, needless to say, we've had a lot of rule changes since then, including our wetland lines, they've been expanded. So we've been dealing with that. We've fallen behind the curve on that. Succinctly, we would like to have a recommendation. We, in fact, were planning on submitting a revised PUD amendment for early in 1998, so it's kind of coincidental that this issue came up. We don't mind having a shorter extension. I was -- I was thinking if we could get, reasonably speaking, a nine month extension, because we'll probably be coming in by the end of the first quarter of nex~ year and that ought to do the trick, so we do object with the original staff report, you know, for the record. We disagree with staff, but, you know, again, we are more than willinq to submit our revised plans based upon the changing environmental conditions that we're dealing with now. CF~IRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Stewar~, you don't feel that you could make the six months' time frame that seems to be what's been standard in cases like this? MR. STEWART: Well, as -- just for clarification, by six months to have it actually out of the process or within six months, have the application submitted? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Submitted. MR. STEWART: Oh, yeah, that's fine. I mean, because again, we were planning on having this thing in by the end of the first quarter. I mean, I would rather have nine months just, you know, the more the merrier. Hey, it's Christmas next week. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Bah, humbug. MR. STEWART: Yeah, exactly. We will remember who's naughty and nice on the Planning Commission. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Well, actually, if -- you know, with a six month recommendation, if the board grants it at their meeting on January 27th, that would be when the six months starts, correct? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Correct. Page 9 December 18, 1997 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: So it ends up being pretty close to that, I think, Mr. Stewart. Ail right. Thank you very much. Any other speakers on this petition? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. COM/4ISSIONER BRUET: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that we extend R-97-8, Vencentian Residence PUD for a six month period. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. That's a recommendation -- recommendation to the BZA? MS. STUDENT: I think you're going to have to rule -- there's a rezone, is there not? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes. MS. STUDENT: You're going to have to rule either, I guess, deny it, table it. I, you know -- but that's the petition that's before you, so you need to take some kind of action on it. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Then -- well, I guess it would be a matter of making the motion zo -- COMMISSIONER BRUET: To include -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- to table any rezoning action for six months so that the paperwork can be submitted and whatnot. That was your motion? COMMISSIONER BRUET: I'll make that a part of my motion, Mr. Chairman, that we table -- table the rezone request for six months to run concurrently with the PUD extension. COMMISSIONER OATES: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion by Mr. Bruet, seconded by Mr. Oates. Is there a discussion on that motion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. -Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That carries unanimously. PSP-97-16. Mr. Nino? Once again, I'd ask all those present that may speak on this petition to please stand and raise your right hand so that you may be sworn. (Speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Mr. Nino? MR. NINO: For the record, Ron Nino. The petition that's before you requests your approval of a preliminary subdivision plat. The petitioner is WCI -- WCI Communities, L.P. You will recall that recently we revisited Pelican Marsh PUD specifically with respect to revising the development strategy for that area lying east of Airport Road. This petition sets in motion the first step in the -- in the development process, sets the stage for them submitting their final plat, and construction drawings for development of the land lying east of Airport Road. Staff recommends approval subject to the conditions contained in the resolution of adoption. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions of Mr. Nino? Is there a presentation by the petitioner's representatives? Any questions of them? Page 10 ~ i II I I I II II II I II III I ]6Gl December 18, 1997 Any other speakers? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Mr. Chairman, I recommend we approve PSP-97-16 and submit our approval to the Board of Commissioners. CHAIRUiAN DAVIS: We simply approve. COMMISSIONER BRUET: We simply approve. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And I know that -- okay. A motion of approval of this PSP by Mr. Bruet, seconded by Mr. Oates? COMMISSIONER OATES: Yes. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any discussion on the motion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. We like to recycle these. Thank you. Petition number PUD-97-15. Once again, all those present that may want to speak on this petition, if you'd please stand and raise your right hand so that you may be sworn in by the court reporter. (Speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Nino? Disclosures. I need to disclose that I had a brief meeting with George Vuko on this particular petition. Mit. NINO: Mr. Chairman, it might be interesting to note ~hat the petitioner is not here, nor their agent. This is a pretty straightforward PUD. I don't know if that's going to be a problem or not. Maybe we ought to proceed with the public hearing and -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Let's see -- let's see how far we get and see if we get into a situation where we may have some definitive questions for the petitioner, and if so, we'll just have to make a decision at that point. MR. NINO: All right. Ron Nino for the record. PUD-97-15, titled Willow Park Commercial PUD has to do with rezoning the driving range on Airport Road, which is immediately contiguous to Princess Park. The development to the south, we have -- basically have agricultural open space land. The sensitive relationship here, of course, is to the east. You have a residential development. You have Walden Oaks, a portion of the Lone Oaks PUD. So we have basically a commercial development on the north side and a residential development on the east side and agricultural open space on the south side, and across Airport Road, why, of course, we have a great big distance, so we need not really be too concerned with that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: But across Airport Road is apartments, isn't it? MR. NINO: It's Arbor Trace -- Arbor Walk, one or the other. COMMISSIONER OATES: Walk, I think. MIR. NINO: The PUD is consistent with the future land use element because the future land use element provides that if you're contiguous to commercial zoning on one or more sides -- one or more sides, you qualify for the commercial -- what's called a commercial infil!, and that is a type of development that is limited primarily to office and service uses and -- and discourages retail types of uses. Page 11 December 18, 1997 Consequently with that, after some period of discussion with the applicant, we structured a PUD which eliminated any of the retail types of activities, with the exception of two borderline uses. One would be restaurants and -- and we were specific there in terms of saying for sit-down only. No drive-in, drive-through, and for hotels and motels. Otherwise, all the uses in the PUD tend to be office and office related types of uses. The PUD sets up two tracts, one -- two -- as your plan shows, the PUD shows the -- there are two tracts, A and B and C -- actually, four tracts. Two tracts, A and B, are oriented towards -- towards Airport Road, and tracts C and D -- tracts C and D are pure office type uses. Tracts A and B are the more office and include service uses like advertising agencies and things of that nature, and -- and opportunity, as I say, for eating places or hotels, motels or. tracts A and B. You can see that the -- the most easterly end of the development is really a water management facility which provides a nice separation from Walden Oaks, so we've addressed, I think, the contiguous residential situation pretty well in terms of establishing some added degree of compatibility. Review by -- by jurisdictional agencies with respect to how does this stack up with level of service requirements such as traffic, sewer and water, all advise staff that there are no level of service deficiencies here. This road will not impact Airpor% Road above the 5 percent significance tests, so therefore, we can stand here and tell you that if you approve -- recommend approval of this PUD, it is consistent with all the elements of the Growth Management Plan. However, we are required to look beyond the Growth Management Pla~. There's findings of fact. The findings of facu are included in the staff report. I think a great preponderance of the findings of fact support a recommendation to approve this PUD, and we always talk to you about simply good, sound planning principles; comDatibi!ity, timing, is this the right time to do it, is the infrastructure adequate, and our answer to all of those is yes. This is a timely action. The uses are reasonable and compatible and we recommend your approval, so if you -- as proposed by the Willow Park PUD, which we've sent you, which -- which has been amended several times. I believe the final document is not signed off at this point in time by -- I'm sorry, it is. It's signed off by Marjorie, so that all of those little issues which may be insubstantial, nevertheless, are important in terms of legal requirements have been satisfied. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Nino, basically we've got a golf course driving range that's gonna become, if this petition's approved, a low-rise architecturally and residential in nature office park -- MR. NINO: Yes. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- with a pretty good water management buffer where it abuts the single family housing? MR. NINO: Yes. That's -- I wish I would have said it as simple COMMISSIONER BRUET: I know. It would have saved a lot of time. MR. NINO: Well, I was procrastinating, hoping the applicant Page 12 16Gt December 18, 1997 would get here. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Does the -- I have a question. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes, Mr. Bruet. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Does the golf course then remain a viable business until this takes place for two or three years or is that appropriate zoning or what happens in these cases? MR. NINO: Until they start construction, yes, the golf course would remain. COMMISSIONER BRUET: It's still a permitted use or whatever term you would use? MR. NINO: Well, it would remain as a non-conforming use. While it's operating, it can remain -- it's entitled to remain, but obviously, the minute they start any construction, that will. put them out of business, I would think. There was one other interesting fact here. I was driving home the other night from the YMCA after workout and they're operating at night, so there are lights out there, so this has got to be a far -- this has got to be a great improvement to all the homes, quite frankly. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And I would -- I would assume by the lack of -- if there -- a lot of people that lived in Walden Oaks were greatly concerned about this -- MR. NINO: Yes -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- I think if we were talking about approving a driving range there, we might have a room full of people. MR. NINO: I'm glad you reminded me. I did get some phone calls, and after explaining it to them, they basically said, sounds pretty good. - CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. COMMISSIONER BRUET: One more question. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes, Mr. Bruet? COMMISSIONER BRUET: Is it appropriate that we get the balance of the trust? You know, Mr. Vukobratovich -- we don't have a list of all of the members. In the past, we have, and I don't know if that's appropriate or not. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: It says consisting of one member. COMMISSIONER BUDD: Yeah, I read it. MR. NINO: Vukobratovich -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Easy for you to say, but you're Italian. MR. NINO: -- would be the only -- COMMISSIONER BRUET: But he is the trust? MR. NINO: He is the owner, yes. COMMISSIONER OATES: Somewhere in here I thought it said that. MR. NINO: It's in our file. MR. MULHERE: I did get in touch with Blair Foley who thought, I think, that the agenda would go a little longer and I -- he threw the phone down and is on his way, so he'll get here -- there he is. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Foley, Mr. Nino has given us a rundown -- COMMISSIONER OATES: A 45 minute dissertation. MR. FOLEY: For the record, Blair Foley. Apologize for being late this morning. Page 13 December 18, 1997 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: No problem. MR. MULHERE: There weren't any officers on the way down on Airport Road? MR. FOLEY: I wasn't aware of any. CHAiR~LAN DAVIS: Mr. Foley, if you could raise your right hand, we'll ask the court reporter to swear you in. (Speaker was sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And Mr. Foley, since you haven't been here, so far we kind of like this project. MR. FOLEY: Oh, it's going to be a very nice project. COMMISSIONER BUDD: Don't change our minds. MR. FOLEY: Okay. Fair enough. I do have handouts, if I may. We -- we've read the staff reports. We're supportive of -- of Mr. Nino's concerns and we don't have any objections other than a few use changes, and I'd like to hand out a package if I could, please, and let you take a look at it. CHAIRMAN DAV1S: All right. Go ahead, Mr. Foley. M!q. FOLEY: On -- on the first page, we actually just included on one of the renderings on the very back, if you would, the -- the large document, the colored renderings offer suggestions and the artist's best idea of what this project may look like. The additional sheet that's been colored is more detailed and it reflects the PSP plan that this board will see in approximately 30 days, a little more detail as far as the fountain and the breakdown of the lots. We thought it might be helpful at this time for you to review that as well. In -- in reference to the use changes, on page 3-1 under section 3.2-A, the principal uses, I'll just go through these real quick. We',;~ taken an opportunity, in fact, to reduce the intensity of some of the uses that were on the original PUD list. The amusement and recreation services are now deleted. The eating places section, there's been just a change in language that removes the -- the reference to indoor seating restaurant only, but it adds by either -- either tract, but not both, outdoor seating shall be no more than 25 percent of the total seating, and those two tracts that we're referring to are the two tracts that front Airport Road. COMMISSIONER OATES: Excuse me, Blair, is this gonna -- the way you've written it, is it gonna change it so that -- we obviously don't want drive-throughs, so I mean, that's what we're trying to stop, which is fine, but -- COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Or fast food. COMMISSIONER OATES: Fast food, yeah, but I mean, is this -- the way you've got it written, is that gonna accomplish that, Ron and Bob, do you think? MR. NINO: I don't -- I don't believe so. I think that once you stroke out the indoor seating and you say eating places only -- 5812, that SIC code includes all the entire ga/nut, fast food, drive-through, all conceivable types of eating places, so that's why -- that's why in the -- in the current PUD it says eating places, 5812, limited to indoor seating, because that automatically eliminated fast food. MR. MULHERE: The way the Land Development Code, anyway, defines Page 14 December 18, 1997 restaurants, there are several different definitions. There is a definition of a drive-through, there is a definition of a fast food. There's a definition of, I think it's called sit-down restaurant, which is really more the family style or, you know -- and maybe with just some classification, if the intent is not necessarily to allow fast food, but to still be able to have the provision for outdoor seating, I think that would be easy enough to accomplish. COMMISSIONER 0ATES: Yeah, and I don't have any problem with outdoor seating. In fact, I think it's nice, to be honest with you. MR. FOLEY: Yeah, I don't believe the petitioner has a problem with that. If I may, Mr. Oates, continue through these and then we can identify a couple of maybe problem areas where we could modify the language that might be acceptable to the board, if we could do that. COMMISSIONER OATES: All right. MR. FOLEY: We have added, as I mentioned earlier, the apparel and accessory stores, also the general merchandising stores are now added to the front, and keep in mind that those two -- those two lots are very small in size. When you have your -- your green space requirements and such, you're probably looking at a maximum size facility on either lot of approximately 10,000 square feet, so any concern of a Toys R Us or any larger type of store there really is prohibited by the site constraints. We have removed hotels, rooming houses, camps and other lodging places. That's not the intent of this development, so we felt that that might be one that needs to be removed. Motion pictures also has been deleted on the first page. On the second page, we have added optical goods stores and spec~alty medical retail, orthopedic and artificial limb stores, wheelchair sales, et cetera. That would be an ancillary use perhaps to some of the lots in the back. We thought that might be helpful. Additionally, on page 4-1 referencing tracts C and D, which are the balance of the smaller lots in the east of the project, we've added one, building construction, general contractors and operated builders, but limited to office space only. I'm happy to answer any questions. I have Mr. Vuko here as well that might be able to speak to some of the needs and demands for some of the additions and changes and we are -- we are willing to work with you, Mr. Oates, on the language on the eating place issue. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Is that really the intent, is still it's -- the type of restaurant that would be the non-drive-through window type, but just to have the amenity of outdoor seating? MR. FOLEY: Exactly. I believe the restaurant use there was -- we're looking to support the park itself, you know, for lunches and that sort of activity. The language that we chose here was least restrictive as far as what opportunities may -- may allow themselves for potential sale of these lots. Mr. Vuko may want to speak more detailed to that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: But I think I heard staff saying that if that was the case, they probably didn't really have a problem with it, and I think that's what I heard Mr. Oates and some others saying, that the Page 15 December 18, 1997 drive-througk windows and that sort of stuff, we don't want to -- MR. MULHERE: I think we'd say restaurants including -- well, we wouldn't have to say whether or not there's indoor or outdoor seating only, simply restaurants. However, no fast food or drive-through. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: All right. I see a lot of heads nodding. MR. FOLEY: That would be fine. CHAIKMAN DAVIS: Okay. COMMISSIONER OATES: I don't care if they have all of it outside. I like to eat outside, frankly. MR. FOLEY: In closing, I think the -- the engineering issues and traffic issues are really straightforward on this property and I'm happy to answer any questions related to those. However, we are in agreement with staff's report and don't have any comment to that effect. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Mr. Nino, comments on the other use changes that -- MR. NINO: Well, the only problem that -- yes, the problem we have is we're not -- quite frankly, I don't think that -- that the uses added, particularly apparel and accessory stores, general merchandise stores, I mean, that's basically shopping center and -- and I'm looking at the standards or the criteria in ~he future land use element, aside from the ones that are obviously present here, project uses are limited, it's in the staff report, to office or low intensity commercial, and you know, the assumption we make is that the emphasis is an office development, and low intensity commercial are basically service type uses that -- that are -- it's the retailing type activities that we normally consider the highest intensity commercial land uses because people are going there on a consistent basis and we would have to conclude that -- that all of those uses being requested that are retail in nature are therefore inconsistent with our understanding of the future land use development. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Even with their limitation to tracts A and B? MR. NINO: Yes. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. What about the addition to the other tracts for the construction offices? MR. NINO: We have no problem with that. We think that's generally consistent with the service type uses. MR. FOLEY: If I may, Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes, please. MR. FOLEY: We feel that the uses that we've scratched are a lot more intense than the ones that we've added and we are -- you know, we've worked with Ron on trying to come up with this list and we've been back and forth a few times. There may be some interpretation as far as what is commercial, what is high use, what is low use commercial property. These clearly are -- are retail. It gives -- it gives the opportunity of the developer perhaps to have a little more flexibility in what might go in the front. Realistically, what most likely is going to occur there is a restaurant and a bank, that it would be specific ancillary uses, but in an effort to try to put a project together that might work, we don't want to preclude a small golf shop or something along those lines that might be selling some Paqe 16 16Gl December 18, 1997 retail property to be located adjacent to Airport Road. We're not proposing any of these uses on the balance of the property. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: What we -- what we may want to consider doing is while the SIC codes, as Mr. Nino points out, provide a pretty broad spectrum of uses, it sounds like the uses they're looking for are probably quite a bit more narrow than that, and there is some time between now and the BCC hearing that they might be able to work together and work a lot of these things out and maybe refine it to where it's in SIC code as put here, but restricted to certain definitive uses that don't pose a problem. MR. FOLEY: We certainly would agree to that. MR. NINO: Chatting with Bob, it's pretty obvious, the home furniture business is a -- even though it's a retail use, certainly is not inundated constantly with cars. I mean, our experience w~th furniture stores is they don't have too many people going through them, so we wouldn't have a problem with home furniture, furnishings and equipment stores, but you know, you really do have a -- talking about apparel, the general clothing sales business, I mean, it's obvious that those things are high intensity uses. MR. FOLEY: We'd be happy to scratch that one at this point in time if we could come to an agreement on that. I know my client would support that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: The apparel and accessory stores? MR. FOLEY: Yes. MR. NINO: Eating places, I think we could live with something that provides for both indoor and outdoor but prohibits fast food and drive-through. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Uh-huh. -MR. FOLEY: That's fine as well. MR. NINO: General merchandise stores, that 5311 to 5399 covers just about -- COMMISSIONER BRUET: Anything. MR. NINO: -- anything in terms of a retail store, you know. MR. MULHERE: I would be willing to look at the SIC code. There's a whole list of -- detailed list of uses and --. and determine between now and the board meeting which ones, if any, we could support, but I don't think we can support the full range of general merchandise. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah, it sounds like they're talking about some uses that might be in harmony with some of the other things here that we all agree upon, and if there's some time to work that out -- MR. MULHERE: Plus i think there are some uses that we could potentially look at as accessory to a predominantly office type use. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Stationery stores. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Uh-huh. MR. ~JLHERE: So we just added some personal service uses to the industrial district, for example, because we think it's appropriate, and certainly that would be no less appropriate here if you have a -- somewhat of a captive employee base that they'd be able to, you know -- so if you look at, you know, the level of -- if we look at some of the uses and maybe provide either some language that it's accessory to Page 17 December 18, 1997 or that it's limited in scale and scope, you know, some of those uses might be appropriate, you know. We could spend a few minutes and take a look. I'm sure we can come up with some of them. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if that would probably get everybody where they -- where everybody's pleased with it and in agreement and -- MR. FOLEY: Ron, do you have any concern over the last two additions on page 3-2, the optical goods store and the specialty medical? MR. NINO: Not the specialty medical or the optical goods. MR. FOLEY: So I think we've narrowed it down to maybe some of the more specific general merchandising stores, and we'd be happy to meet with you and come up with an acceptable list. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Does that seem like a pretty good plan to -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Good plan. MR. FOLEY: Before closing the public hearing, I just want to thank you again for being patient with me and I apologize again for being a little late for the presentation. Thank you for your time this morning. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Additional speakers on this petition? Seeing no additional speakers, I'll close the public hearing. Motion? COM~ISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, forward apprcval of Petition PUD-97-15 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the things we discussed today about cleaning up some of the language on some of the merchandise and eating establishments, et cetera. - COMMISSIONER BUDD: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Motion of recommendation of approval with stipulations by Mr. Oates, seconded by Mr. Budd. Discussion on that motion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. That brings us -- well, that covers all of our advertised public hearings. Brings us to old business, which I don't think we have any. New business -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Under old business, I'd like to wish everybody a happy holiday. CHAIR/KAN DAVIS: Isn't that new business? COMMISSIONER OATES: It depends whether it's old business or new business. CHAI~ DAVIS: Ma'am, could you come to the podium and identify yourself for the record and express to us your concern? MS. HATTEN: Yes, my name is Charlotte Hatten (phonetic). I'm residing at 100 Isle of St. Thomas Street in Port-Au-Prince. I received a letter from Mr. Nino stating there would be a petition heard on PUD-84-76. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Ma'am, that was continued to January 15th at the beginning of the meeting today along with two other petitions. Page 18 16Gl December 18, 1997 MS. HATTEN: It was continued? I must have missed that. January 15th? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: January 15th, yes, ma'am. MS. HATTEN: Okay. And the time again? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: It will begin at 8:30. I'm not sure where it will appear on the agenda. MR. MULHERE: You can never tell. 8:30. MS. HATTEN: I missed that. I'm sorry. I have to get that straight. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: No problem. We appreciate your patience in staying all this time. MS. HATTEN: Okay. Thank you very much. MR. NINO: If I may, Mr. Chairman, relative to that -- relative to that petition and Mrs. Hatten, you might want to check with our office prior to January the 15th because whether that petition goes forward or not depends on whether -- what type of a response we receive to the Growth Management Plan amendment from D.C.A., so that even that meeting is not certain, so if you'd call our office, save you the trouble of coming all the way into town. MS. HATTEN: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: With that, under new business, I had occasion to address the Naples Planning Advisory Board a couple weeks ago on a Land Development Code change they're working on, and while there, I suggested to that group, in particular, Mr. Jim Rideoutte, their chairman, that we might want to consider having a joint meeting with the Naples Planning Advisory Board just so we could discuss mutual issues. It was -- the idea was very well received by their group, and in fact, they said that at least one or two members said they would really like to do it prior to the city council elections in February, which kind of gives us the month of January. I spoke with Mr. Rideoutte on the phone, told him we were meeting today and would see how the rest of you all felt about such a meeting and that we would look at some -- some dates that we might zalk about. We were talking about it probably needing to be a separate meeting and probably having it here in these chambers if it's available. He didn't seem to have a problem with that, and I discussed some dates with Mr. Muihere the other day and it looks like in January, the -- because the 1st is a holiday, that gives us a meeting on the 8th and 15th. COMMISSIONER OATES: We're meeting the 8th and 15th? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes. So that would provide us an opportunity in the same time frame, and we were talking about probably a two hour meeting with them to try to limit it, and Mr. Mulhere and -- and city staff could put together some agenda items for us to talk about, either what would be the 22nd or 29th are two opportunities we have. COMMISSIONER OATES: Either one's fine with me. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Anybody have a preference between the 22nd or 29th or might those be two dates I could offer them? Because we're -- here we are, we've got two fairly large groups trying to coordinate getting together. Obviously -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Don't they meet on Thursday? Page 19 December 18, 1997 COMMISSIONER BRUET: I think they meet on Tuesday. COMMISSIONER OATES: They used to.be Thursday when I was there. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Once a month on Tuesday and I -- COMMISSIONER BRUET: They meet around noon too, as I recall or -- COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Let's give them both dates and -- CHAIR~L~N DAVIS: Twenty-second and 29th? Okay. And I'll work with Mr. Muihere and we can get everybody notified as soon as we pin that down. MR. MULHERE: Yes, because of course we'll have to advertise that. Question, just on logistics, since it will be a workshop and there will be potentially nine of you and seven -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I believe seven. We may have an alternate, I believe. MR. MULHERE: I wonder if the format will work here where you -- I mean, do we need to put up a table and maybe use this tabl~ for them right in front here? COM}4ISSIONER PRIDDY: I'd suggest we go to the supervisor of elections meeting room. That would give us a little more -- MR. MULHERE: That's what I'm thinking. It's less formal, and I'll t,--y to coordinate that with Mary Morgan. COMMISSIONER OATES: Sitting up here, we tend to look down on them and I -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I think sitting around a table together is the atmosphere we want to -- COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: And if you try to put tables down there for that many people, because we've just recently done it with the landfill committee, it's a terrible place to hold a meeting. MR. MULHERE: That's what I thought. So I will -- I will coordinate with her once I know a firm date. Yeah, we could meet in conference room E at Development Services. There's probably more than enough room and a very big table there. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Which one's available may drive it, and that might be easier for them coming from town to get to with the construction on 41 East. MR. MULHERE: Yeah, and I think they've all probably been there before, so that's good. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. All right. And then we'll communicate that, and additionally under new business, did you have a Christmas wish, Mr. Oates? COMMISSIONER OATES: Yes, a holiday wish to everyone. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Merry Christmas to everyone, happy holidays, and with that, we're in adjournment. Page 20 December 18, 1997 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 9:28 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN These minutes approved by the Board on as presented or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING BY: Heather L. Casassa Page 21 I - II I IIII III I III II II IIIIIIIIIII I II II lUl 16Gi January 8, 1998 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNI~ COMMISSION Naples, Florida, January 8, 1998 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:31 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" o~ the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Michael A. Davis Michael J. Bruet Michael Pedone Donald J. York Gary Wrage Russell Priddy ABSENT: Richard Nelson ALSO PRESENT: Marjorie M. Student, Assistant County Attorney Bob Mulhere, Current Planning Manager Page i AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, JANUARY 8, 1998 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE:ANY PERSON WHO DECIDED TO APPEAL A DECISION OF TI-IlS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. 1. ROLL CALL BY CLERK 2. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 20, 1997, November 25, 1997 and December 4, 1997 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: 5. BCC REPORT 6. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 7. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Petition No. SPA-97-1, R. Bruce Anderson, Esq., ofYounlg vanAssenderp and Vamadoe, P.A., representing Joe Dim~ssimo, requesting approval of shard parking on Lot 26 and 27 of the ~rded J & C Industrial Pa~k, Zoned "I", in Section 1 i, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, to serve the existing business on Lots 22 and 23, J & C Industrial Parle, zoned "I", which is located on the north side of Corporation Boulevazd, west of Airport-Pulling Road (C.R. 31). (Coordinator. Chahram Badamtchian) B. Petition No. R-97-9, Rotgrt L. Duan~ of Hole, Montes & Associates rept~-senting Adam Fueredi. requesting a rezone fzom C-3 to C-3 to d¢lct~ a stipulation that resuicts commercial access to Outer Drive for Lots 2-7 and 81-86, Pineland-on-the-Trail, in Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, consisting of 2.5 acres, mom or less. (Coordinator:. Ray Bellows) C. Petition No. CU-97-24, William L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover Planning Shoppe and Beau Keene, P.E., representing Richazd and Teresa Yahl, requesting Conditional Use "2" of the "A" zoning district for mulching and honicultuzal recycling for property located on the south side of Washburn Avenue S.W., approximately % mile north of Alligator Alley (S.IC 84), in Section 3 !, Township 49 south, Rm. nge 27 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 5.19 acres, more or less. (Coordinator. Susan Murray) (Continued fi~m the meeting of December 18, 1997) 1 16Gi C. Petition No. CU-97-24, William L. Hoover. AICP, of Hoover Planning Shopp~ and Beau Ko:ne, P.E.. representing Richard and Tere~ YaM. requesting Condilional U.~ "2" of Iht "A" zoning di~rict for mulching and honicullural recycling for property located on thc south side of Washburn Avenue S.W., approximately 'A mile north o1' Alligator Alley (S.R. 84), in Seclion 31. Township 49 ~outh. Range 27 Ea~t. Collier County, Florida consisting of $. 19 acres, more or le.~. (Coordinator: Su~n Murray) (Continued from (lie m~ting of December 18. 1997) D. Petition No. PUD-91.11(!), Richard Hcndcrlong of Kensington Park Dex,¢lopmcnt repre~nting I. Dudl~ Goodlette, Trust~, requ,ting an amendment to thc Kensington Park PUD for thc purpo.~ of adding .98 acr~ and r~-vising thc Master Plan by moving High Street to Ibc south while maintaining a 20 foot buffer b~tw~n Grey Oaka' existing bulTcr of 40 feet and Kensington's High Street right..of-way; changing land uae from single family detached to multi-family units at the ~outhcm pro~rty linc with no increa~ in unit~ dcnaity or traffic, for property located on Pine Ridge Road (C.R. 896) approximately 'A mile :a~ of Airport- Pulling Road (C.R. 31), in Section 1). Township 49 South, ltangc 25 East. Collier County, Florida, conaisting of ~170 acres, mom or las. (Coordinator: Su~an Mum)') E. Petition No. V.97.14, John Hobart. Architect. representing First National Bank of Napl~, requesting a - forty (40) foot vahancc to thc required ~lback of filly {50) fe~t Io Ica (10) f~t Io i~rmit a canopy to be constru,ned over two (2) parking spa~s for prol~ny located at 8771 Tamiami Trail Noah. further de,tibet as a portion of Parcel "One". Oak,nora Parkway Extension. in Seclion 33. Township 48 South. Range 25 Ea~. (Coordinator: Suaan Murray) 8'. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 11. ADJOUP,.N !/11198 ccPc AGENDA/md 2 January 8, 1998 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: If I could have your attention, please, we're going to call this meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission to order and begin by calling the roll. Mr. Priddy? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Budd? COMMISSIONER BUDD: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bruet? COMMISSIONER BRUET: Present. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Davis, here. Mr. York? COMMISSIONER YORK: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Oates? COMMISSIONER OATES: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Pedone? COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And Mr. Wrage? COMMISSIONER WRAGE: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Addenda to the agenda, I -- I think on the printout that we have, Mr. Mulhere, that item C and D -- MR. MULHERE: Yeah, repeated twice. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- is a repeat, so we'll just -- we'll just delete item -- I guess C was just printed twice. COMMISSIONER OATES: Which one are you going to eliminate, C or D? COMMISSIONER YORK: They're both C's. We've got two C's. COMMISSIONER OATES: They could be both D's. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: We have three sets of minutes up for approval. COMMISSIONER YORK: Mr. Chairman, I would move that the minutes of November 20th, November 25th and December 4th be approved as presented. COMI4ISSIONER BRUET: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion of approval by Mr. Oates seconded by Mr. Bruet. Discussion? COMMISSIONER OATES: No, I didn't approve it. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Beg your pardon? COMMISSIONER OATES: It wasn't me who seconded it. COMMISSIONER YORK: I did. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: The motion was by Mr. York, seconded by Mr. Bruet, I'm sorry. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. Any absences upcoming? COMMISSIONER OATES: I'll be gone -- COMMISSIONER BRUET: Again? Another European tour? COMMISSIONER OATES: Yeah, kind of. I'll be gone the 19th of February. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Anything in the way of a BCC report, Mr. Mulhere? MR. MULHERE: No, sir. Page 2 January 8, 1998 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Under chairman's report, I talked with Jim Rideoutte from the Naples Planning Advisory Board and given him the dates of the 22nd and the 29th of this month that we spoke about for our joint workshop. Their meeting, I believe is this coming Monday or Tuesday and we're going to try to select a date and we'll work with Mr. Mulhere as far as advertising. I explained to Mr. Rideout that we needed a couple weeks to advertise it and I think what we were talking about was from like nine to eleven at Planning Services on Horseshoe Drive which should be convenient to everyone, which brings us to our advertised public hearings, the first one being SPA-97-1. I'd ask all those present here today that may want to speak on this petition to please stand and raise your right hand so that you may be sworn by the court reporter. (Speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Badamtchian? MR. BADAMTCHI~: Good morning, commissioners. Chahram Badamtchian from Planning Services staff. Mr. Bruce Anderson, representing Mr. and Mrs. Daniel and Barbara Hoover, is requesting approval of 27 off-site parking spaces for Teo's Restaurant on J & C Boulevard. The Teo's Restaurant has 75 seats. They had off-site parking on an adjacent lot. Since the lot has been sold and the lease terminated, they were in need of 27 additional spaces. They found these 27 spaces on Hadinger Carpet property, which is 260 feet away from the restaurant. Staff reviewed this petition and recommends approval. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions of staff? Mr. Anderson, did you have anything you wanted to add? MR. ANDERSON: Only to answer any questions, sir. CHAIKMAN DAVIS: Any questions of the petitioner's representative? COMMISSIONER OATES: I had one question. These people are open for lunch? - MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Yes, they are open -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Is that not going to cause a problem with parking for Hessler (sic)? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Right now they don't have these 27 parking spaces and they do not have a parking problem at the restaurant. We have police reports and neighbors' affidavits saying that they never have parking problems, and Hadinger Furniture, being a furniture store, they have more parking than they really need. They have several spaces, more than required. Staff believes that there will be no parking problem at Hadinger Furniture store. COMMISSIONER OATES: What happens if these people cancel the lease? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Then they have to find another lease, I guess, another property. MR. MULHERE: Well, first of all, the board can cancel the lease at any time or require some additional revisions or accommodations for parking if a problem arises. So in other words, if they do become Page 3 January 8, 1998 very successful for one reason or another and they require additional parking, we can go out -- the board can cancel the lease at any time and require additional provisions for parking. As far as whether or not -- by entering into this agreement, first of all, I think that there would ke some legal action, I'm not sure, and perhaps Mr. Anderson can speak to that issue, but they're entering into an agreement for a certain period of time and -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Did they not have that the first time? MR. MULHERE: Well, there was some question about that the first time. COMMISSIONER OATES: I wasn't here when -- MR. MULHERE: Yeah, there's some question about that on -- MR. ANDERSON: Commissioners, my name is Bruce Anderson representing the p~titioner. The problem with the first lease that was approved by the county and entered into was that there was a legal defect in it and the property owner -- the other property owner was able to compel the county to void the prior parking approval that they granted, and that's why we're back before you today. We have a ten year lease. We submitted numerous letters from surrounding property owners that they have never observed a parking problem, and if -- if this lease were to be canceled, then they would either have to remove seats, try to find some other parking mechanism or apply for an administrative determination that the normal parking requirements of the Land Development Code should not be applied to this use. COMMISSIONER OATES: If they, in fact, had to remove seats, then they would lose their regular liquor license? MR. ANDERSON: Yes, sir, they would. MR. MULHERE: Or a parking variance. MR. KANT: Edward Kant, Transportation Services. I just want to get it on the record so that there's no question as to whether or not this issue was brought up, when the Airport Road project, which is the six laning project from Cougar Drive to Vanderbilt is put out to bid, it will include some improvements to J & C Boulevard for the first, roughly 1,000 feet, and that will be equivalent to about a four lane section. I just want to make sure that everybody's aware of that because this particular off-site parking is across the street and would require people to cross that street. We're not here to lobby for or against it. I just want to make sure you gentlemen have that information. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. All right. Any other questions of Mr. Anderson or staff? Anyone else here today to speak on this petition? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Mr. Chairman, I recommend we forward petition SPA-97-1 to the BZA with a recommendation for approval. COMMISSIONER YORK: I'll second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion recommendation of approval by Mr. Bruet0 seconded by Mr. York. Discussion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Page 4 I II IIIII II IIII I IIIII IIII IIIII 16Gl January 8, 1998 Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. Petition R-97-9 -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I have just one small statement to make. It has to do with grammatical English. In both this petition and the petition preceding it, on page three in the bottom underlined in F, I-T, apostrophe, S, and if you'll also notice on the bottom of this petition, I-T, apostrophe, S It should be I-T-S *** · COMMISSIONER BRUET: Mr. Chairman, that just shows the level that is taking -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Obviously Mr. Oates must have been an English major at Ohio State. COMMISSIONER WRAGE: What's the point? COMMISSIONER OATES~ Well, there's a proper way to do things and an improper way. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: With that, I'll ask all those present that may want to testify on this petition to please stand and raise your right hand so the court reporter may swear you in. (Speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: We don't have a petitioner present? Well, if we need you to testify, we'll swear you in at that time. Mr. Bellows? MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows presenting petition R-97-9. The petition seeks to rezone property from its current C-3 classification to C-3 for the purposes of amending the ordinance that adopted the zone change to allow for a secondary access point onto Outer Drive. The subject property was rezoned in 1995 and it contained a stipulation that prevented commercial access onto Outer Drive. The purpose of this petition is to amend that stipulation to allow access for the medical office use. The petitioner believes that access to Outer Drive is essential to provide medical services to the adjacent nearby residential areas to the south and to the southeast. They had concerns that if there were an emergency, they could get into the medical facility without having to circle around back on 41 to get into the facility. It's the intention of staff to create a development order that will allow for the access for medical office uses only, and if at such time the medical office reverts to a commercial use, that access point would be closed and made into an emergency exit. As you see from the compatibility standpoint, the subject site is located on the south side of Tamiami Trail. Outer Drive follows along the south side -- or boundary line of the property. There are five existing commercial retail uses that have access points on Outer Drive with intermingling of traffic. COMMISSIONER YORK: Is that the -- near the exit to Sugden Park or the entrance rather? , MR. BELLOWS: Avalon Drive is here. COMMISSIONER YORK: Okay. MR. BELLOWS: Staff has had discussions with the property owner Page 5 January 8, 1998 here to vacate this little alleyway. This is Ted's Sheds. This will allow for a larger commercial parcel here. Staff hasn't received any letters for or against this petition. Staff is recommending the Planning Commission forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. COMMISSIONER OATES: I have a question. If people just park -- move in -- or not move in, but drive in and park in the medical center, what's going to prevent them from walking across or what over to the commercial area? MR. BELLOWS: From the medical office? COMMISSIONER OATES: Uh-huh. MR. BELLOWS: Well, there's -- each -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Or vice versa? MR. BELLOWS: -- each commercial use has its own driveway COMMISSIONER 6ATES: I understand that, but there's -- is there going to be a lot of planning so that people won't be able to get -- MR. BELLOWS: Well, at the time of the site development plan, I'm sure we will ~ddress the landscaping issue and buffer. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: If you've been out on the East Trail lately, Ed -- you're talking about walking across the East Trail to that commercial -- COMMISSIONER OATES: No, no, no. I'm talking about if you go in on Outer Drive and park that way, what's to prevent you from walking through -- not across the Trail, but across another piece of property into whatever or vice versa? COMMISSIONER PEDONE: They're pretty heavily shrubbed between each piece of property over there. MR. MULHERE: Actually, I'm -- I'm not sure we wouldn't want to encourage some sort of pedestrian access between properties. What -- as a matter of fact, I think we require a pedestrian access between properties. MR. BELLOWS: I believe there is a sidewalk on the 41 side MR. MULHERE: Yeah. ' COMMISSIONER OATES: I'm not talking -- MR. MULHERE: You're talking about parking -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: The commercial that's along there is pretty much low intensity, as I recall, the specific businesses that are through there. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: You have a furniture store, a hardware store. You have an appliance store. You have a paint place, and you have an office building which houses the Department of License, driver's license. MR. MULHERE: I would suggest that we would look at a site design that predominantly provides the public parking towards the front of the business, and that that access be secondary, and whether or not you have employee parking there; so it's less likely if people are parking towards the front that they're gonna, you know -~ I'm not saying that couldn't happen. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: The problem is, if you come out of that particular piece onto 41, you can only make a right-hand turn, and so Page 6 1661 ' January 8, 1998 people going west have to go up, make a U-turn and come around, whereas by going out the back way, you can come over to the Sugden Park entrance and there's a traffic light. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah, and with the improvement plan for the entrance there by Sugden Park, you know, it just seems like a natural, real common sense thing here to do this. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I would be -- am surprised that there aren't more -- there aren't any residents who live on Outer Drive with the single family homes across the street who aren't here to -- to raise any question about the traffic. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: By the same token, with the secondary entrance, the -- the person designing the building almost has like two fronts to it, so they may end up with something facing them that's better than they would if it w~s just strictly the back of a building with no access. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: True, true. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: So it may be a win/win situation. MR. BELLOWS: Yeah, I think if you look at most of those existing commercial uses, they have somewhat architectural treatment on the back side for the entrance off of Outer Drive. I went into each one of those. There's water management areas and there's existing landscape buffering and natural vegetation. It makes it difficult to cross from the parking lot from each one anyway and I really don't see that being a problem from a, you know, a safety standpoint. COMMISSIONER YORK: Ray, what this petition is requesting then is access from both Outer Drive and 417 MR. BELLOWS: Well, they have legal access to 41. There is a stipulation in the current zoning approval that prohibits commercial access onto Outer Drive. The petitioner's proposing a service related use, and it's staff's opinion that there won't be a significant amount of trips for that and it would be a safety benefit to have an access out on Outer Drive. There is a dental office there that has access, a child care facility that has a primary access onto Outer Drive, along with those other five existing commercial uses. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And it's a medical use and the stipulations in here that revert, as you said, reverts to some commercial, then it becomes emergency only. MR. BELLOWS: That's right. MR. KANT: Edward Kant, Transportation Services. Keep one other issue in mind. That original stipulation did come from our office and we're not objecting to the change. When they get the driveway permit, that is exactly what it is, it is a permit, and if we find that the uses are changed or there's violations of that permit -- of those permit conditions, then we can impose sanctions on them. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Kant. Any questions of staff? Petitioner have anything to add? Anyone else here to speak on this petition today? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER YORK: Mr. Chairman, I would move that we forward Page 7 January 8, 1998 R-97-9 to the Board of County Commissioners with recommendation for approval. COMMISSIONER OATES: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion for recommendation of approval by Mr. York, seconded by Mr. Oates. Discussion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. Petition CU-97-24. Once again, I'll ask all those present that may speak on this petition to please stand and raise your right hand so that you may be sworn by the court reporter. (Speakers swo~n.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Miss Murray? MS. MURRAY: Good morning, Susan Murray, Planning Services. I just want to start out and make sure everybody got Exhibit D, the complete Exhibit D. There was two pages. It goes through number 13. I can hand out another copy if you'd like. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Exhibit D? MS. MURRAY: It's attached to the resolution. There was a problem the first time this was scheduled and then I just wanted to make sure that got corrected and you all were -- COMMISSIONER BUDD: It goes through 137 MS. MURRAY: Yes. COMMISSIONER BUDD: I've got through nine. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I only have through nine also. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: This is D, right? MS. MURRAY: That's correct. The staff report on this petition is rather involved and lengthy and I'm gonna just kind of try and do a brief summary and summarize what staff feels is important. I'm not going to discuss the horticulture mulching operation itself so much. I think I'm going to leave that to the petitioner. They're the experts on that. I did want to describe that the site, access to the site, surrounding development and zoning, and then touch on the criteria that staff used to evaluate the request. The site is located on the south side of Washburn Avenue. It's a quarter mile north of Alligator Alley and it's two and a quarter miles east of County Road 951. The site's ten acres in area, but the front five acres are all that is being considered for this conditional use approval. The front five acres has 686 feet of frontage on Washburn Avenue and it's 329 feet deep. The front five acres are nearly devoid of trees and they house a single family dwelling unit and one outbuilding. Access to the site is provided via Landfill Road to Crawford Avenue north, then east to Washburn Avenue. The 20 foot right-of-way, which is Washburn Avenue, is private and it's currently covered with a lime rock surface. Surrounding development to the north -- all the surrounding Page 8 I11 I IIIIIIIIII I I IIIIIIIII II -' - .,il ii ,,ii, ,, . January 8, 1998 properties are zoned agricultural. To the north, we have two single family homes and a mobile home on five acre lots. The south property is owned by the petitioner. It's five acres. It's vacant and heavily wooded. To the east, we have a single family residential home on a five acre lot, and to the west, there is an existing single family structure; however, it is abandoned. Further west, there's a cellular tower, and then further west from the tower, about 700 feet from the subject property, is the Collier County landfill property boundary. I'd like to comment on the results of the analysis of the request in relationship to its consistency with the required criteria for staff evaluation and comment. The evaluation of negative impacts associated with the proposed use were considered in relationship to the type of development surrounding the subject property and the zoning designation,of the surrounding properties, and I'd like to point out that although the zoning is agricultural surrounding the subject site, the uses are primarily residential in nature. There appear to be no active agricultural uses immediately surrounding the subject site. With respect to the criteria required for evaluation, staff identified the following significant issues associated with the proposed use: Staff recognized that one negative impact of the proposed use would be that there would be an increase or a significant volume of large truck traffic on a private non-paved road, which also provides access to the site, but it also provides the m~in point of entry to other properties located in sections 35 and 36, so it is quite heavily used. Another negative impact associated with the use is that there would be increased dust and maintenance problems associated with heavy trucks traveling on a lime rock surface road. That noise from the operation of the machinery on site and noise from the trucks coming and going from the site would be negative, that there would be significant dust production resulting from several aspects of the proposed mulching operation and the truck traffic on the access road, that there would be a negative impact associated with the visual impact of storing horticultural debris, mulch and heavy equipment on the subject site, that there was -- existed the potential for the dumping of waste on the site other than horticultural, that there are hazards associated with the operating of -- operation of the tub-grinder in close proximity to the surrounding residential land uses, and that there would be a negative impact of the storing of heavy equipment and performing routine maintenance on this equipment within the subject site. Staff also identified conditions associated with the subject site which helped mitigate some of those negative effects that I just mentioned, and generally those include the following: The close -- the close proximity of the subject site to the county landfill; the location of the site in relationship to other developed properties; the six foot high fence surrounding a portion of the site; the natural vegetative buffer which surrounds the site on the south, east and west; the relatively low traffic volumes on Washburn Avenue; the Page 9 January 8, 1998 layout of the proposed site plan; the existing sprinkler system on site; and the zoning designations of the surrounding properties. In addition to the aforementioned existing conditions, staff has proposed additional conditions and enhancements to the existing site conditions to further mitigate the negative impacts associated with the proposed use, and those are listed on Exhibit D that I handed out to you. Based on the conditions of the site and staff's recommended stipulations, staff feels confident the negative aspects associated with the proposed use can be substantially mitigated, and therefore, staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward CU-97-24 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval with the stipulations listed on Exhibit D. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions of Ms. Murray? COMMISSIONER ?RIDDY: Yeah. Who maintains that road now? MS. MURRAY: I believe it's the homeowner's association in that area. I did want to mention, I also received some letters in support of the proposed use, Jerry Russell and Martha Pike Christansen (phonetic), 2251 Washburn Avenue; Marcella Yahl, 2321 Washburn Avenue; and Frank Yahl, 2221 Washburn Avenue; and a Richard Lancaster, 2170 Washburn Avenue. These are all the properties basically surrounding to the north and east of the subject site. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: What about the length of time that the mulched product or product going to be mulched is stored on site, is there any stipulations about that? MS. MURRAY: I did not put a stipulation on -- on time. I discussed with the petitioner the specifics of the use and he indicated to me that there was relatively little -- that there was quick turnaround time from when the product was mulched until it was hauled off site to be used elsewhere. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions of staff? In the way of disclosures, I had a couple conversations with Mr. Hoover about this project, and with that, we'll turn to you, Mr Hoover. · MR. HOOVER: For the record, Bill Hoover, representing the petitioners. I think we're in pretty good shape on this. Mr. Richard Yahl, actually -- at one time, he owned 35 acres back in here and he's the person that put this road in there originally at his own cost and he put the road in, from what I understand, from around the landfill all the way back to Smith Road, which would be in excess of a total mile in length. Since he's familiar with the road business, he's -- we just saw these stipulations a few minutes ago. On number two, he's saying that the last part of that, prime coat surface, would not be in everybody's best interest. What we would like to -- that doesn't permit it to be regraded. He's gonna have equipment on site. They're willing to regrade the road twice a week from their project entrance to the landfill area where the road's paved, and down the road here, let's say at a maximum of two years, they would be willing to go ahead and pave this road if -- the homeowners are in the process of trying to maybe pave this road the whole way back to Smith, so at that time, the Yahls would be Page 10 ~anuary 8, l~g8 willing to pay a fair share of that. COMMISSIONER OATES: I have a question, Mr. Chairman. Who's going to enforce that they scrape this every two -- or twice a week? MR. HOOVER: Well, it -- the people down there in this neighborhood, I guess maybe the best way of describing it, it's sort of like the Yahls went ahead and put the road in first -- COMMISSIONER OATES: But a number of the people that sent letters in are Yahls. MR. HOOVER: Yes, there's a lot of Yahls in the neighborhood there. COMMISSIONER OATES: They're going to be in favor of it, I would assume, since mom or pop owns it, or Uncle Joe or something. I mean, I -- I -- you know, if they -- they're trustworthy people and all that, but who's going to enforce that they scrape it twice a week? I just don't -- I mean, the Sheriff's Department certainly has plenty to do that they can't go out and enforce it. I think our enforcement people as far as the county is concerned seem to be -- have a lot to do. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I think it's -- it strikes me, it may very well be a -- I could be wrong about this, it may very well be a situation, for it to support the truck traffic in and out of there on a daily basis, they may have to grade it twice a week. MR. HOOVER: That was mentioned to me a long time ago that if they didn't maintain the road in good -- good condition, it costs them more in truck maintenance than it does to keep the road in good condition, just from extra wear and tear on the vehicles. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: But how does that answer the dust control problem of the road? Without the -- MR. HOOVER: We would sprinkle, it once a week with water. MR. KANT: If I may, gentlemen. Edward Kant, Transportation Services. That was -- that particular stipulation was a stipulation that originated in our office and we don't have a problem if they're concerned about the prime coat. That was our attempt to ~ry to maintain a dustless surface. The issue we believe is to maintain the dustless surface as best as possible. Sprinklering (sic), if that's a word, is one way -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: It works. MR. KANT: -- is one way of doing it. Laying down calcium chloride, you know, there are a number of different ways they can maintain a dustless surface, so we're not hung up on the prime coat. As far as the issue of grading is concerned, I would tend to agree with Mr. Hoover's statement that if they don't keep the road in some semblance of reasonable order, it's going to cost them a lot more to maintain the trucks than it is to grade the road. MR. HOOVER: Yeah, in the -- Mr. Bill Russo, who's going to manage this facility for the Yahls, I -- actually already works for them, he's going to live on-site and his family's going to be living there, so that's a little bit more motivation there, so it's not -- since the equipment will already be there to grade the road, it's not very difficult for him since he's living on site. Page .I January 8, 1998 MR. KANT: And I might add that those -- that road and most -- all of the roadway network east of the end of the paved portion of what's called the dump road or access road number one is not maintained by the county. COMMISSIONER YORK: Would you define prime coat surface? MR. KANT: I beg your pardon? COMMISSIONER YORK: Prime coat surface. MR. KANT: It's a -- typically, it's a cut back asphalt tack -- it's like a tack coat, and all it is is just -- it's an asphalt application, and you've probably seen them either on regular highway projects or out maintaining non-surfaced roads, and they put a coat of this down and they sand it and that tends to hold the -- both the surface dust down and it tends to hold the road together a little better. COMMISSIONER ~ORK: But easily torn up by big trucks? MR. KANT: It's still fairly easily torn up, yeah. Over time, it will eventually form some sort of a riding surface, but with a truck driving in -- and keep in mind, I think from our review of this, we didn't see that this is -- I was -- I would submit to you that we probably get more trucks on a daily basis on Airport Road or Golden Gate Parkway than they'll get on that road, unless they're turning this into some kind of a major industrial operation. I don't see that either, given the size of the facility. I think that the concern is that, right now there are a number of residents living back there that are using that road and I would submit that if, in fact, they have to maintain that road for this facility, it's going to be of benefit as opposed to a negative impact, but you know, again, that's a value judgment. I don't want to necessarily make that part of the consideration. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That's -- that's a good point Mr. Kant, the necessity to maintain. Mr. Priddy? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Hoover, this operation in comparison to Forrester Resources (phonetic) up in Fort Myers that does a similar thing, is this going to be much smaller, same type of thing, is it going to be put -- is the mulch going to be put into bags to be sold to the public, or is it going to be hauled back out in dump trucks for larger projects or what's the end-user of this product? MR. HOOVER: We are planning on bagging this thing. It was planning on going out in dump trucks, so if a dump truck came in, it very well may be that same dump truck may be filled with something that was mulched, you know, within a day or two before that to go back out. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Okay. And who's the end-user of that product, is it large developments that need bulk mulch or -- MR. HOOVER: I'll let Mr. Russo answer that because I'm not familiar with that. MR. RUSSO: We're going to basically -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Russo, identify yourself for the record. MR. RUSSO: Yeah, all right. Bill Russo, I work for Yahl Page 12 January 8, 1998 Mulching. Basically what we're going to be doing, to answer that, is we have, you know, like your cypress mulch, your pine mulch and stuff and, you know, when we bring the stuff into the site, we're going to separate it, and we have more of a market for like pine mulch and what have you that, you know, is very expensive. I have people who sell it now and there's a big -- there is a market for that. When we get like our pepper hedges and our -- the junk mulch, we're just going to take that off and we have places that are going to use that, you know, developments and people that are going to take that for fill or whatever they want to use it for at that point, you know, but basically we will be bagging it. The pine mulch, we're going to be looking for the -- the fines from the pine is very much in -- in demand. The cypress is -- is in demand, you know. There is a definite use for that. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Where do you get the cypress from? MR. RUSSO: Well, you know, it -- COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: You may not want to answer that. MR. RUSSO: Yeah, we don't have any control over that anyway. COMMISSIONER YORK: Heavily wooded area -- MR. RUSSO: Not from this site anyway. CHAIRPIAN DAVIS: Mr. Russo, one concern I've got, with a mulching operation, once it's mulched, if it's stockpiled and laid on site very long, it will begin to generate odor because the decomposition begins MR. RUSSO: Right, uh-huh. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: What would you say would be a reasonable time frame in which -- MR. RUSSO: Turnaround? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- turnaround -- MR. RUSSO: I would say probably no more than 90 days, 120 maximum. I don't think this stuff would be stored -- I mean you're talking if we -- this -- this -- we would probably be running the equipment on the average of ten or 15 hours a week to mulch this. We're not going to accumulate an excess amount, you know -- it's not going to ena up looking like the Collier County landfill, you know, where it just sits there or they just take it and haul it and -- 90 to 120 days, this stuff would be turned around, if not in a quicker solution, but I would say, you know, to make it feasible for everybody, 120 days, max, that it would sit there for any length of time without, you know, a turnaround. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Any other questions? COMMISSIONER BRUET: I've got one. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bruet? COMMISSIONER BRUET: Being adjacent to the landfill, is that a benefit or is that just a coincidence? I mean, you don't rely on the landfill at all for any of your operations -- MR. RUSSO: No, no, because we're -- no, we don't. We're doing this now. The landfill is not a -- it's just a coincidence. Yeah, we just -- yeah, that's all that is. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I have another question. Would the fact Page 13 January 8, 1998 that you have a mulching operation there and you might not charge people to bring some of their horticultural stuff in, would that be a benefit to the landfill for not having to accept that and the people not having to Day to dump -- dump that off -- MR. RUSSO: I think it -- it's -- COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: -- or will you be taking palm fronds from yard folks that do tree trimming? MR. RUSSO: No, we're not too interested, no -- I mean, if -- you're cleaning your yard out and you want to drive with your truck in there, I don't think we're going to look -- you know, we're not going to look to that. We're just basically looking for what we do for -- you know, if you have a lot that you're clearing and we haul the stuff off of that lot so that we can separate the stuff and we can recycle the material, we're basically looking to recycle this material is what we're looking for, and I think this is going to have some kind of impact on the landfill. It's going to cut down on the amount of horticultural going into the landfill, without a doubt, you know, because we haul in there on a regular basis now. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Will commercial dumpsters that handle the vegetation, is that part of your market? MR. RUSSO: Yes. Yeah, we have a commercial dumpster division. COMMISSIONER BRUET: I know you do and that -- MR. RUSSO: We're not looking for outside -- in other words -- COMMISSIONER BRUET: All right. Yours that Yahl handles, of course, but the others is not -- MR. RUSSO: No, we're not looking for that. COMMISSIONER BRUET: You're just keeping it within your business? MR. RUSSO: Yeah, we're not looking for that at all. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. COMMISSIONER BRUET: I do have probably one question for Mr. Hoover. Are there any non-Yahl residents within this -- MR. HOOVER: Yes? MR. RUSSO: Yeah, there is. I think there's only two petitioners that are Yahls that signed that. MS. MURRAY: I think I had three, but there was a -- the property owner to the east is not a Yahl and then I think the two to the north were. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any other questions of the petitioners? MR. HOOVER: If we can just be clear on how we want to do that road surface in the motion, it's been discussed, but I don't know if it's really been resolved yet. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I don't have a problem with relying on them to maintain the road -- COMMISSIONER YORK: I don't either. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: -- themselves. Take the tack coat out. COMMISSIONER BUDD: I agree. MS. MURRAY: Did you want to stipulate a number of times of week or what have you? They mentioned twice a week. Is that sufficient or COMMISSIONER YORK: How are you going to monitor it? Page 14 16Gl January 8, 1998 COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: We can put it in there, but I don't think it's going to be monitored. I think it's going to occur that they're going to keep the thing up because it's to their benefit, but -- MR. HOOVER: We already have a page and a half of stuff that really the county has to monitor that anyway, if you want to add that MR. MULHERE: It would probably be good to have, say, a minimum of twice a week. That way, if there is a complaint from a resident or something, then we have something to go on. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Sure. All right. Thank you, Mr. Hoover. Is there anyone else here to speak on this petition today? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, having filled out my conditional use petition permit, whatever, I move that we forward CU-97-24 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to the change in item two of the -- of Exhibit D stating that -- tha~ there would be twice a week grading of the road as -- as -- and/or more as needed. How's that? MR. MULHERE: Yeah, that's good. COMMISSIONER YORK: I'll second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion for recommendation of approval with the added stipulation by Mr. Oates, seconded by Mr. York. Mr. Oates, would you be amenable to also adding a stipulation that -- that there's a 120 day limitation on the stockpiling of either mulch materials or materials to be mulched? COMMISSIONER gATES: Sure. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Excuse me, just mulched materials. COMMISSIONER gATES: Sure, that's fine. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I think that's another situation where if they leave it there 120 days, they probably can't put it in a bag and get rid of it. CHAIR/~AN DAVIS: Yeah, I think it will probably take care of itself, but I don't think it hurts for it to be there. MS. MURRAY: Mr. Chairman, did you also want to include sprinkling of the road? That was mentioned too. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah, as it was mentioned by the petitioner, yes. MS. MURRAY: Once a week? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Was that your intent, Mr. gates? COMMISSIONER OATES: Yes, it was. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Any other discussion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRF~A/~ DAVIS: Carries unanimously, and everybody's signed their finding of fact? COMMISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, before we proceed with the next petition, I'd like to make a statement. I called the county attorney's office almost two weeks ago to determine whether I would be eligible to vote on this particular item. I was told that it was Page 15 January 8, 1998 probably no problem at all. Forty-five minutes ago, I was told there was a problem, that I shouldn't vote on it. I rather object strongly to the fact that I heard no reply for almost two weeks and I heard a reply this morning that really kind of takes away my rights as an American citizen, in my humble opinion. Had I known in advance, obviously, I would have done things differently. I object strongly to the treatment by the attorney's office. MS. STUDENT: For the record, Marjorie Student. We apologize, but myself and our staff that was working on this, because of the holiday, many of us were out and we apologize to Mr. Oates. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: So Mr. Oates is recusing himself. I'll also be recusing myself. I have an ongoing business relationship as a vendor with the petitioner, and therefore, must recuse myself, and with that, Mr. Bruet, as vicerchairman' I'll pass -- if I had a gavel, I would pass it to you. Without a gavel, it's all yours. MR. GOODLETTE: Mr. Davis, as the applicant here, may I make just a comment or suggestion? You might want to take the next item before us so that those of you who are in panel now can hear that and the other ones, £ don't know whether you plan to stay for this. I think there's one more item after ours on the agenda. You might want to take that First National Bank item and then come back to this one. That's just your call, obviously, Mr. Chairman. I didn't know whether -- since there's only one remaining item on your agenda. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Nobody's going anywhere. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: No, we'll just -- we'll let it be as it is. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Also for the record, I've had discussions with the petitioner with respect to this particular issue. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Vice-Chairman, I had a phone call yesterday from a Ms. Cawley alerting me that there was two sides to this story. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. We're all set? Staff. Excuse me. Yes, we need to swear in anyone who is going to testify on this particular item. (Speakers were sworn.) COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. Staff? MS. MURRAY: Susan Murray, current planning. The petitioner seeks to repeal the current Kensington Park PUD and to adopt a new PUD and master plan without essentially changing the land use strategy. In addition to updating the PUD to current formatting policy and references, this petition seeks to amend the PUD master plan by adding .98 acres on the south side of the existing maintenance site, to move the Kensington High Street right of way along the southern boundary further south, and to remove the western fire access easement from the master plan. The amendment also proposes to remove language in the PUD document which presently limits development along the southern project boundary to single family residential in order to allow multifamily resident development, and lastly, removing language requiring Page 16 January 8, 1998 provisions for an interconnect with the property to the west to be established upon development of the 525th dwelling unit. I'd like to focus the rest of my presentation on the removal of the language in the PUD document which prohibits or prevents multifamily development on the southern project boundary, because I think that's where most of the questions and issues are going to be. Relative to this proposed change, staff does not find that the proposed multifamily use is incompatible with adjacent land uses. Presently, the adjacent lands on the subject site are undeveloped. The property adjacent to the southern boundary, which is Grey Oaks PUD, is platted for and partially developed with single family residential dwelling units. Therefore, the uses on both projects will remain residential in nature. There are approximately eight platted single family lots which lie in Grey Oaks at the southern boundary of the Kensington Park PUD. These lots are separated by a platted golf course tract, and at this point, I'd just like to go ahead and reference in your packet at the -- after pa~e five, you should have received a diagram kind of outlining the way the properties are laid out in relationship to each other as they are presently approved under the current PUD document versus what the applicant is proposing today. COM/~ISSIONER YORK: Would you go through those, Susan, please~ MS. MURRAY: Would I go through them? ' COMMISSIONER YORK: Yes. MS. MURRAY: Yes. As you can see, between Kensington and Grey Oaks, within Grey Oaks, there is an existing 40 foot wide berm and buffer area which is densely landscaped. What the applicant proposes to do is move the Kensington High Street right of way to the south and eliminate the area on the south side of the street right of way presently shown on the improved master plan as developable for single family residential. The applicant also plans to increase the minimum ten foot required landscape buffer to 20 feet between the southern property boundary and the Kensington High Street right of way. So what you have is there's an existing 40 foot wide Grey Oaks landscape buffer, plus the proposed 20 foot wide Kensington buffer. Then next comes the 60 foot street right of way. Then with the required building setbacks on both projects, there's going to be at least a minimum of 150 feet of separation between the closest single family dwelling unit in Grey Oaks and the proposed multifamily land uses in Kensington Park. At least 50 feet of the buffer will be or already is heavily landscaped. Further, in your staff report, I just wanted to clarify an erroneous statement and I had stated that further the height limit of the residential structures on the Kensington Park PUD is not proposed to change from the present allowable maximum height of 35 feet, and that is incorrect as it relates to the single family dwelling units. Currently, single family dwelling units are permitted to be a maximum of 30 feet in height. This amendment proposes to change that language to allow them to be a maximum of 35 feet in height. Page 17 January 8, 1998 Also, the multifamily dwelling units currently are allowed to be at a maximum height of three stories, which is an undefined number consistent with the land development code. We clarified that, the language, and the language is going to be changed from three stories to 35 feet. Staff's analysis revealed that the other proposed changes are compatible with the comprehensive plan and will not increase impacts related to traffic and infrastructure, nor will they change the current land use strategy. For those reasons, staff is recommending that the Collier County Planning Commission recommend approval of PUD-91-11(1), being a petition to repeal and readopt the Kensington Park PUD as described by the draft ordinance of adoption and exhibits thereto. I did not receive any letters in opposition or in favor of the proposed request. COmmISSIONER BRUET: Any further questions of staff? If not, petitioner? MR. GOODLETTE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My name is Dudley Goodlette with the law firm of Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson, 4001 North Tamiami Trail in the City of Naples, also here in my capacity as the trustee of Kensington Park Development in conjunction with this petition. First, again, we appreciate the staff's recommendation of approval, and as outlined by Ms. Murray in her Comments. the PUD for Kensington Park was approved in 1992, approval for 600 units There's no change, obviously, in that request. ' At the appropriate time when the -- when it's time for a motion, Mr. Chairman, I might ask that you -- you -- you consider, depending upon your disposition with respect to the issues that are going to be before you this morning, as Ms. Murray indicated, I believe that most of the discussion is going to relate to the single family at the south end, not with respect to the addition of the barn. .98 acres for the cart So if you're so disposed, some of you may feel one way about the .9 acres -- .98 acres being added and another way about this -- the single family at the southerly end, and if you would consider perhaps, at the time the motion is made, to bifurcate those two, we might appreciate your considering doing that, Mr. Chairman. We hope and we urge that you approve both the addition of the land as well as the change in the -- in the use at the south end, but I just wanted to mention that at the outset, and I think that it's important, if I may just indulge the commission for a couple of minutes to -- for me to inform you of a couple of changes that have taken place in the Kensington Park PUD. ApProximately 14 months ago, the developers of Kensington Park engaged my services as trustee to replace the -- the original developer, Mr. Brugger, who was the trustee from the outset of this project, and in conjunction with that, it wasn't just that change that was made, they also began to realize that there needed to be an infusion of some -- and a reinvigoration of the project, and in that Page 18 16G1 January 8, 1998 regard, obtained other planning consultants to take a look at the Kensington Park PUD document and all of what's happening within the Kensington Park project to determine if -- if there weren't changes that could be made to -- to improve and enhance that project, and in that regard, they retained the services of -- of Mr. Armalavage from a market standpoint, from Mr. Mullins (phonetic) from a consultant,s standpoint, team plan to come in and look -- Mr. Michael Redd (phonetic) to come in and look at the project in a fresh view of the entire project and -- and I say all of that and -- and importantly retained the services of Mr. Henderlong in house as the director of planning and development and -- and in that regard, their objective was, as I said before, to try to invigorate and enhance the quality of the project there at Kensington, and we believe we have done t~at. And in that regard, this petition before you today is the culmination, if you will, of those 14 months or so of effort, and what we have done is we have met with the residents and so that there are other changes that have taken place and are taking place within the Kensington project other than those that are before you this morning. And in order to try to keep an open line of communication with our residents, we have very recently, just Tuesday of this week, concluded a town hall meeting, at which we discussed various changes in various pods and other things that are going on within Kensington by virtue of this -- this planning process that has been ongoing for these 14 months or so and -- and it's important for you to -- to know that -- that some of the residents raised -- and including, by the way, this petition. We discussed what we were going to be doing here this morning, what we were presenting, and many of the residents within Kensington had some concerns. They expressed those concerns, and we're going to be prepared to discuss some of those, and we appreciate the expression of those concerns. We're going to be discussing some of those, particularly traffic. John Asher at Coastal, who's newly on board as well at Kensington in a consulting capacity, his firm is, is going to be explaining some of the traffic issues and why we think they are lessened, reduced impacts, not increased impacts. And I just -- I wanted to let you know that there are a myriad of those changes going on. Now, with respect to -- to -- to the issues relating to the southerly property line, Jack Lieber, who is a landscape architect, hopefully is going to be here momentarily, and is going to participate in making this presentation, but I think at this moment I will defer to Mr. Henderlong, who has really been carrying the laboring oar, if you will, on the planning and development, to make the presentation regarding the changes and how we believe that the increased buffer, the increased setbacks, are -- are going to -- are going to be a friendly gesture to the neighbors to the south in Grey Oaks. And -- and if I may at the outset, I'll mention, since Ms. Murray mentioned it in her opening comments, we are amenable to -- and would stand before you now and indicate that our petition would be amended to reduce from three stories and 35 feet to two stories and 30 feet Page 19 January 8, 1998 what we're asking for at the south end. So we're not asking for any increase in height above what's currently permitted. We're not asking to go to three stories. We would like to go to two stories, which is the product that we're looking at at the south end, but we're not going to increase the height at all from what's currently -- what was approved in 1992 by the Board of County Commissioners, and upon the recommendations of this planning commission, I might add. So I'll be available to answer any questions. I appreciate your indulgence, but I'll turn the podium over to Mr Henderlong at this time. Thank you. · MR. HENDERLONG: Good morning, Mr. Chairman, commissioners. I'd like to thank you for -- first of all, I'd like to address a l%ttle bit of the staff report before I get into the formal segment of our presentation. I would just like to clarify just for the record that on page two of the staff report, surrounding land use, the western side, it's important to understand that we do buffer the World Tennis Center to the west, which does have established single family and multifamily units, and they do have a landscape buffer of only ten feet to the west. That's a developed, existing project. Also that it's important to understand, at the northeastern section of this project, after I get into the details, the 276 multifamily unit project is a three story project, and those are 100 percent rental units which we abut to, and which perhaps you will recall in the past, you reviewed and saw about as late as two years ago, I'm told. So we'd like to get into those issues. With that, I just want to compliment the staff and say that we -- we initially started this process late last year, as Dudley pointed out, with Michael Redd's team plans, a concept plan over a year ago. That concept plan talked about southern units on the multifamily end of the project. This is driven by market changing conditions. New to the team this year is a select preferred builders agreement program. Kensington is the site of the 1998 parade of homes. There is an excellent array of builders and new changing market conditions that have warranted why we're here today. In taking a look at that analysis and beginning to understand how can we best complete the development of a 600 unit PUD, it was early determined that we needed to go back and fix some things up, begin to take a look at some of the design details of the elements as they pertain to buffer, landscape and use. Those are the three key issues we'll be talking about today, as well as the visual and physical impacts as they may affect surrounding properties and as they relate to the interior of the project. With that in mind, I'd like to tell you that we are expanding the golf maintenance facility by .98 acres. It's coming another 110 feet to the south, and I'd also like to make sure it's in the record, as it's stated in the staff report, that we are removing the emergency access easement on the west side across from Yorktown inasmuch as that we will be building by the year -- within the next three years, a new Page 20 January 8, 1998 entrance on Livingston Road, which will also help to minimize some of the traffic impact, internal both and external once Livingston Road is completed and constructed. ' So with that in mind, I'd like to go right on to the presentations. It will take me a minute or two to get the boards up here. We're going to present you with a proposed master plan that is -- first, I want to demonstrate to you the existing master plan as it currently sits today, and also how the relationships of where the road was to be, and then show you the proposed master plan and how we're altering and talk about those relationships if you d give me just a moment. , ' Is it better if we set them up front out here for you to see or do you want to see -- okay. And I've got some handouts here for you too. MR. GOODLETTE: Since I think what Mr. Henderlong's handing out to you is the same as these, I'm going to point these so the audience can see them. Is that okay, Mr. Chairman? COMMISSIONER BRUET: Absolutely. MR. HENDERLONG: Okay. Taking a look at the current concept plan, what you have in front of you is the project primarily and predominantly being completed. It shows all the different neighborhood communities. It shows a nice bridge. It identifies Yorktown. It identifies Ashley Grove, which is a new community, home estates, Canterbury Greens to the west of the subdivision. At the northeasterly quarter, we find Lancaster Square, the Hamlet, multifamily units. These are two-story units priced in the range of 300 or 400,000. That upper east -- northeastern corner is the area where the Saint Albin (phonetic) rental apartment complex is at three stories with a ten foot buffer against our 20 foot landscape butter. In the interior of the project, you'll find a new community that is being proposed and was recently platted. It's called the Kensington Gardens plat. That is a private, gated community. All the traffic associated with that community will enter and exit the easterly new proposed access easement; not proposed, but it's required once Livingston Road comes in. So we see that that new project will minimize internal traffic conflicts that seem to be an issue that came up during the town hall meeting. At the southerly end of the property, you will see the undefined but yet the perimeter road not constructed to date, yet to be completed. That perimeter road would identify and allow 44 single family, detached residences at the south side of the road along abutting to Grey Oaks. That is, the PUD allows for a 60 foot wide lot with a hundred foot width depth behind that. That's roughly about 6.5 acres, and I will be presenting to you an elevational diagram that's a little more blown up and in color from what you're looking on your black and white that accompanied your petition, and let me show that to you now. That is this drawing, and when we look at it, we can see that the easterly -- the -- where -- let me get the other mike here. Page 21 January 8, 1998 When we look at it up here, you'll see the building -- this is the side yard setback for the nearest two story single family unit within Grey Oaks. It has a 40 foot buffer. This berm is constructed. Went out into the field, took pictures of the property. I have those here, both internal and external from both sides. We looked at the 40 foot buffer, the constructed berm and the height of the existing ficus three hedge, which is fairly mature in its growth. When we engaged Jack Lieber, we talked to Jack, how could we best minimize the density and the views across between the two properties. As these ficus trees continue to mature and grow, it creates an open area at the lower -- underneath the canopy to the base. That is how we came to the conclusion that we need to stagger these sabal palms and get a fuller head to block the view underneath, recognizing this berm would be construCted here. Unfortunately, he's not here to go into detail right at the moment about this but he's more than happy to do that. ' We have a second cross eleVation that talks about a different planting scheme at different points on a larger master plan, on a sectional cross view. So when we look at the.building from here to the back, the top portion here demonstrates your nearest building if they are all 47 single family lots from this point to this point. That distance is 7.5 -- 47.5 feet offset by 20 feet to the rear. With this new proposed plan, by moving the roadway closer, creating the landscape buffer and holding a front yard setback to 25 feet, we increase as much as 105 feet the total distance from building to building as it relates to -- or as Susan talked about, over 150. It's actually 167.5 feet, but it's 105 feet additional increase as it relates to the landscape material and the open space between that. Our position is -- is that this -- this is much more compatible than the existing zoning that was originally proposed back in 1992. COMMISSIONER YORK: I have a quick question. The top diagram, th~ top diagram that you're holding, Mr. Goodlette, tha~ is as it's currently approved? - MR. HENDERLONG: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER YORK: And the bottom one is your proposed changes~ MR. HENDERLONG: Yes, sir. ' COMMISSIONER YORK: And are you suggesting that the building height be limited to 30 feet or are you -- are we talking about going to 35 feet? MR. HENDERLONG: Both of these drawings are shown where they can build at 35 feet in their PUD. We put this at 35 feet to keep them all the same. We will reduce that by five feet here, our buildings. COMMISSIONER YORK: Thank you. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I have one question while we're there. I notice under the existing plan, as it is today, without you being here, do you all not have a landscape buffer to the back of those 44 residents? Because it wasn't shown -- MR. HENDERLONG: Yes, it does. We have on that -- we showed 20 feet there and that's why we showed two dimensions, ten and ten, because within ten of that feet we'd also have to landscape. Page 22 16G1 ' January 8, 1998 COM/~ISSIONER PRIDD¥: Okay. MR. HENDERLONG: And we did not insert on that rendering. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: It didn't show up on that. MR. HENDERLONG: No, it did not, that's correct. All right. Looking at how that deviates then taking a look at the current -- the proposed plan, which is your second drawing, we've come up with a -- we've modified some of the land use tracts, you'll see, internally, and those -- there's five of them. They're Tract A, B, C and D. This diagram here differs from the current concept in two areas. On the western side, you'll see a lighter yellow colored portion called Hampton Row. That was a new project and subdivision that was amended and came in. We replatted that area and added zero lot single family units there. ' Also on the easterly side, west of the golf maintenance, there were 22 lots for Sheffield Villas, completion of the villa project That's ongoing as we speak. ' And a new project to be built called Wellington Place, and I've got a diagram and an elevation view to show you that Wellington Place, we have a letter of intent and a contract to build this product on four -- three of the remaining undeyeloped portion on this proposed plan you're seeing today. I'd like to show you what that building's going to look like. This is A1 Bateman's communities. He's developed in country club side reserve. That's why we're able to talk to you now about a two-story building, in fact, and be able to make that reduction, and let me present that to you. These are -- this is the footprint of the building. These are four units, attached, two story multifamily units. You can see that there are ten buildings shown on the proposed plan. We will continue that on Tract D, C, and A, and then on Tract B we have anywhere from remaining 47 units left in there. Market will tell us whether they're all going to be single family or multifamily, but assuming the worst case scenarios, our studies demonstrate that we're -- about 23 buildings would be located along that southern perimeter road given that cross sectional elevation compared with 47 single family detached buildings running on the southern perimeter. So we feel there's greater open space with this plan to be seen across from in width from Grey Oaks. We also feel that it has less -- John will talk to you a little bit and present with you the traffic impacts associated with the current planning as it stands today under our PUD versus the proposed plan that -- and he'll address that now for you. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I have one question. Would you repeat the tracts again that you're proposing to put this product on, D, C and A? MR. HENDERLONG: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: And B -- B is left open -- MR. HENDERLONG: Is yet to be defined. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Is yet to be defined. Thank you. MR. HENDERLONG: And what we did on B, Mr. Priddy, we pretty much determined that if we continued with that product that he had, that's Page 23 i lllllll, llll ii I I I I IIII I IIIII I I II IIIIIII I I IIIIIII I IIIIIIII - ~ I January 8, 1998 how I came up with the 23 buildings in there. That would be the worst case. We could lessen that impact if we're successful in finding a developer or a builder to undertake single family, detached units in there, and that could be reduced quite a bit. Okay? If John would come to the podium and perhaps he'll tell you a little bit about the internal traffic -- COMmiSSIONER YORK: Did you say that was 47 single family homes originally? MR. HENDERLONG: Yes, on the southern end, yes, sir. What John is presenting to you is an internal trip generation summary. This is in response to looking at internal traffic with a modified buffer and roadway alignment that we're proposing to you today, and that's really the issue, is what is acceptable for a development adjacent to Grey Oaks as -- that's the primary rea:~on why we're seeking the relief or repealing the previous stipulation that we find the following table. MR. ASHER: Fer the record, my name's John Asher. I'm an engineer with Coastal Engineering Consultants in Naples here. Basically, I was asked to look at the -- the existing PUD and look at the trips that could be generated from it, and looking at the top of the first table, we've got the existing dwelling units. Those are all the different platted lots and existing multif,unily and, you know, they're summarized with a total number of units. The bottom part of the first table is the proposed dwelling units. Block I would be the south property line with the 47 single family lots that could be fit in there, and then block B is the north side of the southern road that -- and that would be done with multifamily and that's -- that number was filled in to come up with the 600 units, and then the -- so we total up all the dwelling units and we look at the trips per dwellin~ unit, which comes from the ITE trip generation manual. It's basically the standard thing that we use to, you know, study our traffic impact and -- with the county, and we come up with the total trips that are approved or are allowed based on the approved PUD master plan. The t~ble below is with the modification with the buffer increased and the roadway shifted down, and if we stay with the 600 dwelling units, we end up -- the existing obviously are the same, the proposed dwelling units, the tract in the middle. The one that wasn't spoken for could be 14 single family units, and then we'd have 207 multifamily, and you can see that the -- the trip generation would be decreased based on this plan. Are there any questions? It's pretty straightforward. Getting back to the adequacy of the buffer and the plan as it's being presented to you today, we've a~reed to the staff, made a recommendation, and we agreed that we would construct that buffer and landscape berm if it's approved prior to the first issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any of the buildings down at that southern end so it gets built in place, put up front and -- and begins its mature growth quickly and rapidly. We believe it's compatible in that respect. Page 24 January 8, 1998 We believe it's also compatible to the existing surrounding uses. The county land development code only,~ at the time, required a ten foot buffer. We've increased that. We've exceeded the requirements. We've reduced the intensity, in our opinion, of the visual impacts of buildings both~in the number and also in that surrounding open space, as I mentioned earlier. With the current plan of the 47 single family units, that is certainly permitted in the PUD and something that we can do at 60 by the 100 foot lots. We think we can minimize that with this current plan that we have before you. We've increased the dimensional building setbacks from the rear of the property line to these front yard buildings with this new proposed plan. We think that's a strong positive. We've added additional planting materials in terms of trees and shrubs to help minimize any visual impacts that could be associated with Grey Oaks, and we feel that we will also be constructing a black vinyl clad fence between the two properties to also minimize any -- maintain security and separation between the two properties. The distribution of the vehicle trips, in fact, are actually being split. If we -- if I can draw -- just grab the board for a minute and show you basically one thing to take into consideration when you hear about traffic internal movements. As -- as Mr. Mankin (phonetic), who's the CEO for Kensington Park is holding the diagram, roughly all the way from this corner to here diagonally, half the development is built and constructed and platted. It's being built. It's platted. Most of these units are all in except about 40 units that are four buildings up here in Lancaster Square. This building here, one, two, three -- or five buildings, one, two, three, four, five is not in place. This is where the rental apartment complex is here. We tried to meet with the apartment complex and increase our landscape buffers between the two. They're three stories up here. We were not successful in coming to a resolution. So what the county permitted here is a ten foot buffer with 30 foot trees and they're putting in mahoganies, very minimal landscaping. We've been very extensive to protect ourselves internally. These are 400,000 -- 300, 400,000 units versus a rental complex here. Looking at the homes, single family homes in Grey Oaks here, we're of the opinion that with the two together, the issue is singular; what is an ade.qu~te buffer between multifamily versus single family. We're of the opinion that with the plan and the required stipulations that we're to construct this all up front, that this is fully adequate and offsets any mitigating concerns that were not able to be fully explored when the initial PUD was presented. And it's market driven. It is also compatible. It's a doable project that we feel we can complete. When you look at traffic again from this point to this point, once this entrance is completed, people take the path of least resistance. They will enter out this way, go Page 25 I I II I I I I II IIII II III III III I I II IIIIIIIII January 8, 1998 up Livingston Road quickly so that if there's any discussions about internal traffic, there should not be an increased traffic coming through the guardhouse in here now because there's a second alternative for people to get in and out. Also Eatonwood Lane (phonetic), these 83 units that are not in that traffic count, they're in the total count, but these 83 units certainly are not going to be running around this way or using this on a minimal base, other than to go to the country club, but primarily getting outside the project off this entrance. That is to the east. CO~MISSIONER BRUET: Excuse me, Rich. Don has a question. COI4MISSIONER YORK: Yeah. The staff report -- when I read the staff report, it says there is no increase in density. MR. HENDERLONG: That's correct. COMMISSIONER YORK: Yet that particular area that we're talking about on the south end of the project, we're talking about originally it was 47 single family residences; is that correct? And now we're talking about 23 four unit buildings? MR. HENDERLONG: What -- what the PUD stipulated was that the southern property was to be single family, detached units only that abutted Grey Oaks. That is -- so using our lot dimension of 60 foot wide lots by a hundred foot in depth, that constituted 47 buildings at the southern end. To answer your question, that would be correct. Those are two story. If they were all built at two stories, we showed you all two stories that were -- could be built there. Many of the homes are two story within the' community, not all, but some of them are all two stories. So given that scenario, comparing it under that scenario of all two stories, a builder going in and doing that, we're comparing that with the multifamily on the north~side of the road. COMMISSIONER YORK: Well, maybe I'm missing something or you're missing something. We could have there, the original scenario, 47 single family homes, right? MR. HENDERLONG: That's correct. COMMISSIONER YORK: Now we're proposing that we have 23 four unit buildings; is that correct? MR. HENDERLONG: Not all four unit, but 23 buildings. COMMISSIONER YORK: That was my question. MR. HENDERLONG: Right. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Don, I think the other thing is, the 47 would be allowed below the existing road south, where the new proposal takes in all the property to the north side of their road. COMMISSIONER YORK: Okay. Okay. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Which is a -- MR. HENDERLONG: And there would also be other units north of that road. COMMISSIONER YORK: That answered my question. MR. HENDERLONG: Even under the current plan too. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I have one quick question. When is Livingston Road going to be built? Page 26 i6G1 January 8, 1998 MR. HENDERLONG: It's currently scheduled the year 2001. There's a hearing coming up in April. The public works department, we met with them, talked to them about that, and they said that's where it's currently scheduled. They're going for design fee approval this April before the board. Okay. I've been informed that Jack Lieber's here, and if you'll indulge me a few more minutes here, I'd like to have Jack get up here and talk to you about his study as it pertains to both sides of the properties. Thank you. MR. GOODLETTE: I'm sorry. May I just -- I want to come back to your density question, Mr. York, which I think it's a very good question, and I want to make sure we responded to it very accurately, and I'm going to a~k John Archer -- John Asher to -- to answer that based upon what he handed out. I think there's a graphic in front of you. MR. ASHER: There is no change in overall density or -- I understood your question to be are we shifting more density down to that area. COMMISSIONER BRUET: That was his question. MR. ASHER: And the answer is no, that based on my tables, there's 379 units that are existing, and in either scenario there's still 221. What we're doing is we propose to shift the 47 single family that are immediately adjacent to that south buffer, and we're talking about moving them up away on the -- to the north side of the road, and looking at the second table here, we'd have 14 single family and 207 multifamily, but that's still all in the same south end of the project, but we're shifting the units away from the south property line. MR. GOODLETTE: I appreciate your indulgence, Mr. Chairman. I just wanted to make sure we answered that before we moved on. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Marjorie? MS. STUDENT: Mr. Vice-Chair, I believe that this gentleman has not been sworn, so he'll need to be sworn before he offers any testimony. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. (Speaker sworn.) MR. HENDERLONG: Let me point out to you this is another sketch that's in your packet and the staff report. This is a little bit -- we do have the full drawing that will probably cover the entire length of this wall, and we're certainly happy to unravel that and show it to you to talk about how we approached this design problem. We wen% out, got a copy of all the plats of Grey Oaks. As you see on this diagram, these are the exact locations of the platted cul-de-sac, single family units here. There are three cul-de-sacs. At the end of each cul-de-sac are two single family lots. This most easterly single family -- or it's Bellflower Lane, has -- the golf course is in this area. There's a golf hole located here. So these two properties, again, taking the worst case scenario, Page 27 January 8, 1998 the 7.5 feet with the side yard setback, that's the cross section we use. So there are two homes here affected by the -- your decision today, and then also this side over here off of Sedge Place (phonetic). So we're looking at one, two, three lots, and these other four lots in the interior, and we asked Jack to take a look at the end of each cul-de-sac. I do have photographs if~you want to take a look at views from their back, and I'm certainly willing to give that to you. MR. LIEBER: In working with the existing buffer area in Grey Oaks, we took all of that into consideration along this whole line, and then increased our density of planting in the specific areas that related to where there was some problems with holes in their buffering and all that, and then increased that width so that we would kave actually all of this distance as a double buffer. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I have one question. I notice you're using sabal palms to fill in between the lower vegetation and the canopy. Being the proud owner of a million or so of these sabal palms, they tend to grow and get tall. So at some point, they would be above the -- the canopy trees that are existing? MR. LIEBER: They're not a rapid grower. The reason for using them in a staggered height and double rows, such as we have done out there existing today, is to establish that immediate effect of ~he under plantings that would be planted initially would then grow up and fill in that, so that within that length of time that there would be a solid buffer. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: By the time the sabal palms grow past that viewpoint, your smaller plantings would be up? MR. LIEBER: Exactly. It's mostly viburnums and that kind of material that's under there so that that's not a -- would not be a problem in the future. MR. GOODLETTE: That concludes our presentation, Mr. Chairman. If there are questions raised by members of the audience, I hope that you'll give us an opportunity to respond to any of those at the appropriate time. Thank you very much. COMMISSIONER BRUET: We will. MR. GOODLETTE: Mr. Armalavage is here and others with the development consultants are available to answer some of those specific questions as if and when they do arise. Thank you. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Would you mind placing this last exhibit up on this wall, if you could? MR. GOODLETTE: I'll need a tall person to get it up here. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Is there anyone else who wishes to speak to this issue? Please come forward. MS. CAWLEY: Good morning. I'm Barbara Cawley. I'm here representing the Grey Oaks Homeowner's Association. Generally, we don't have a problem with what Kensington Park is proposing here. The only thing that we are concerned about, as I know Mr. Henderlong has been speaking to you about, is what is going to happen along the southern boundary of this project. Page 2 8 16Gl January 8, 1998 We have really a couple of problems with that. One, the very first one, and we have some homeowners here that are going to further talk to you about what their concerns are as well as Mr. Jim Eak (phonetic); who is with the developer of Grey Oaks, and basically our concern is, there was a commitment made when this project was approved in '92 and we believe that that commitment should be kept, and that's a very, very important thing with projects in our community where we agree to do something and then we better stick with it or else there's -- the commitments mean nothing in the future. You can come back and just modify at whim. I have a couple of questions and -- and concerns about the idea of putting single family -- replacing single family units with multifamily units on this project. It's a problem of mass and scale. Single family, homes are not always two story units. There's probably no more than a fourth of the units in Collier County are multi-story units because the people who come to Collier County don't really want to go upstairs, and you can drive around in all of your communities and you can see that the majority of the units are single family -- are one story, and I -- I question their n~'~ber of 47 units down there on that south border. I have a plan that was done in '93 that actually shows 29 single family units along that border, and these 29 lots are very similar -- are similar to the lots that they've already developed in that project as single family. So it's unlikely that they would modify that to put in 47 units, and I can pass this around, if you'd like to see it. It's my only copy. We came in here thinking they were going to increase their height to 35 feet and we are pleased to hear that they are planning on keeping 30 feet. The idea of having, I think they said 23 buildings of, I don't know, four or I don't know how many units are going to be in there, we still have not heard the number of units that they're planning on putting in these 23 buildings, the difference between a single family and a multifamily view of -- of a project is a multifamily, 23 buildings creates basically a wall of units through there. You don't have the breaks in the spacing that you would have with the single family where you may have, you know, some multi-story, two story units and some mostly one story units throughout there. So you get basically a wall of multifamily units as you've been able to see from basically the wall of units that they have along their northern boundary. It's a very similar type of thing. So you end up with a visual -- maybe not from the -- from the way they show here directly on one side of the berm, but as you get further into Grey Oaks, where you actually -- they have two story units that view this type of product that they're talking about here. The other thing is, I didn't see anywhere in their document, a copy of their new master plan, and I don't know if they've submitted that to the county. Have they? Well, it was not in the packet of information that I've gotten, and there's no assurance, based on what they've -- what they have in their documents, about exactly what Page 29 January 8, 1998 they're going to do. I mean, they've said a lot of stuff here today, but none of that is in their PUD, which really tells us exactly what they're planning on doing, and we're concerned that they won't follow through with their commitments that they've said here today, just like they want to change their commitment that they had in their PUD originally. We're very concerned about that. I would like to get an answer about exactly how many units that they're talking about along this southern boundary. With 23 units, I don't know what that exactly means. We counted 92, if it's 23 units at four unit buildings, but we don't know if that's the number or not. MR. HENDERLONG: If it pleases the chair for a minute, I'm going to give you a copy, of our current contract that we have. We kave 176 units planned. These are two story buildings that I showed you earlier, four units per building, except in that Tract B, which I mentioned to you earlier. MS. CAWLEY: What is Tract B? COM~4ISSIONER BRUET: Undefined at this time. MR. HENDERLONG: That's undefined, okay, and what I did is if we took 40 units, the 40 units -- there are ten more buildings that could go in there, so when you add the ten, that's where the other 13 -- I gave 13 for these, but there's actually less than the ~3. MS. CAWLEY: So how many units is that? We don't really know because Tract B is an undefined number? Is that correct? COMMISSIONER BRUET: In total, yes, in total units -- MS. CAWLEY: Well, Tract B is a tract that directly borders along the Grey Oaks boundary. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Closest to the property. MS. CAWLEY: Yes, and therefore we really don't know what's going to happen in that area, and we are concerned about this wall of multifamily two story units being located in there, but our primary concern is the commitments and to keep their commitments. We are very, very concerned about that, and would like you to approve their petition with everything except for the change in the PUD document that requires them to put single family units along the southern border, and I know other people are here to speak on this as well. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. Excuse me, Barbara -- Russell? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: One question. Barbara, I too have a concern about the commitment, and that may ultimately be the reason I don't support this, although I realize that they have done an outstanding job of -- of trying to minimize and buffer. How would your group feel if -- if Tract A were -- I mean Tract B were designated as single family as opposed to unknown, because that seems to be the tract that takes up 33 percent of the southern -- southern border and yet is closest to the -- to the lots. MS. CAWLEY: This is our first time we've seen it, so -- COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Yeah, because what I'm looking at in Tract D, C and A, you're going to end up with somewhere probably three to four buildings 150 feet away that are much different than the square, Page 30 January 8, 1998 boxy building on that drawing and would, in some effect, look like a large, you know, single family home. So you're only talking probably three, four, or five buildings that could be built in Tract A, C and D, you know, that's going to be that -- that bigger structure. MS. C~LEY: Well, I appreciate their drawing, but very rarely does anyone build a single family home that looks like this, nor a multifamily home that looks like this. I mean, they don't build big square boxy buildings because they can't sell them. We would still like to go back to the commitment and say that they committed in 1992 to put single family units along there, and I know they're working hard to try to minimize the impacts, but we really feel that that's -- that's one of the reasons that the project was approved, and I have the minutes of the meeting where it was approved, and it was specifically pointed out in those minutes that one of the reasons that they got their approval was because they committed to the single family units on the south end, and that was Commissioner Saunders' motion and Commissiener Volpe made -- to reinforce the motion said, does that include the requirement to keep the single family units in Grey Oaks, and it was affirmative. So I know that the developer, Jim Eak, would like to talk to you about that some more, but I think that's the big issue here, and that people have been purchasing property within Grey Oaks with that understanding. So I'm going to let Jim further -- fu2~her tell you a little bit about their concerns of what happened -- what their opinion was when this was first approved. COM~4ISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. MR. EAK: Jim Eak, Grey Oaks Development. Barbara has really expressed most of the issues that we're looking at, which is in 1992, there was long discussions between Kensington Park and between Grey Oaks, and it was agreed to at that point that it would be single family. We planned and built our buffer accordingly for it to be single family. We knew that there could be two story buildings there, which could be 30 feet in height, but as you see in most of tl~e community, your two story and single family is roughly a quarter or at the most a half of the community. We planned with that. We made reliance on that through our real estate sales. We have also talked to our homeowners when they had questions on that fact of · what is going next door, and we say that is going to be single family housing, and I'm -- you know, they have done a very good job of showing what they've done. They've planned what they've done, but it still goes back to this is what, you know, was agreed upon. We have agreements like that with Carriage House Lane. We had agreements in Hawk's Ridge that were to that same stature in cases where we lost at least one sale because someone could not build a two story home that borders Pine Woods. In development, you make these agreements. I think you should just stand by these agreements. Thank you. MS. INNERNALLY: I'm Mary Innernally (phonetic). I live at Grey Oaks, and my home faces straight down. My main view is looking over Page 31 January 8, 1998 at that tract, and I never would have built there had I known it was going to go multifamily, because that's exactly where I face. You know, I just hate to see anything change once you -- other people make plans. It just doesn't seem right that things should change. I mean, I -- I would have built somewhere else had I known. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. MR. CAPER: My name is Lee Caper (phonetic). I live at 2508 Spicebush Lane in Grey Oaks. We bought our home in Grey Oaks in 1993, and we bought the home there because of the natural beauty of the place. The wooded area and the low density were the primary considerations that basically made our decision to buy at Grey Oaks, even though we looked at many other places. At that time, it was represented to us that that area and the surrounding areas would be single family dwellings. The thing that we liked most about Grey Oaks was that when you're out on the golf course, the residential homes are pretty well hidden by the trees, the pine trees, which is an outstanding feature in the place, and basically, as far as the eye can see, when you're out there, there is pretty much of an unobstructed and natural view. The idea of having to face a, quote, a wall of buildings at the north side of the development would be pretty disappointing to us and inconsistent with what we were led to believe at the time we made our investment. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Excuse me. Is your lot on .... MR. CAPER: No, our lot is not on the board. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Pardon me? MR. CAPER: Our lot is not on the board. COMMISSIONER BRUET: So your view is not really affected by this? MR. CAPER: Well, what I'm trying to make is, the thing that infl~uenced our decision to buy at Grey Oaks was the natural view of the entire complex and that when we're out there using the golf course, and the reason we bought is because of the golf course, we don't see anything other -- primarily anything other than a natural view with other homes set back behind the trees. That's inconsistent with what is being proposed here and pretty disappointing. Thank you very much. MR. OATES: For the record, my name is Ed Oates and I do live in Grey Oaks. What the -- Rich and Dudley have said is probably very true and I would agree with them that they'd certainly want to buffer their northeast corner against rental units and I can understand that they would do that and have done that and good planning would dictate that they do that to preserve their three and $400,000 units that are going to be up against rental properties. I'm not sure that that applies in this particular instance, what they're talking about buffering at the south end, but that's -- I can understand they'd want to do that for theirs. Susan is good -- does good planning in the county that has been -- we've had for years, does that not dictate that single family against single family is probably the best of all worlds? MS. MURRAY: It's probably the best of all worlds, but it doesn't exist throughout the county. Page 32 January 8, 1998 MR. OATES: I didn't ask that question. I asked, does it -- is it not the best of all worlds. MS. MURRAY: I answered your question. Yes, sir, I would say so, in a planning sense. MR. OATES: Okay. Thank you. What Barbara brought up, I think, was very important. There was a commitment made. There was a commitment made by Hawk's Ridge. There was a commitment made by other developers throughout the area that they would not build multi family against single family. Hawk's Ridge, as Jim just told you, lost some sales because of that. So I think that you should take these commitments to your heart and to your head and understand that a commitment made by a developer is a commitment made by a developer and they should stick with that. Barbara's point, I think, was also very well taken. If 25 percent of the people build two story homes in a single family, it's probably high. I'm probably even high, but when you go up with condos, multi family, you're going to go up two stories. Their intention, apparently, was to go to three stories. They've now changed that this morning to two, but it's not compatible. It's definitely not compatible. I happened to be out on my porch when Rich Henderlong went up in his cherry picker, and I'll tell you, it doesn't make a bit of difference from our -- our vantage point -- I happen to live on Bellflower Lane. I'm about 700 feet from the property line, and it doesn't make a bit of difference whether they move back 167 feet or whatever it was, is that correct, 167 -- it doesn't make a bit of difference. If you're up at 30 feet, you're up at 30 feet and it still makes a wall. -I would appreciate your consideration and I would hope that in your heart and mind, you can recommend denial of this petition. COMMISSIONER BRUET: If there are any other speakers, could they line up perhaps over here behind the podium to move along a little bit quicker? Thank you. MR. PINTO: Good morning. My name is Frank Pinto (phonetic). I'm building a home at Kensington. I think I speak for many people at Kensington, but I'll keep my remarks on a personal basis. Barbara, you're very, very correct, there should be a -- a value to commitment and there should be accountability against what was promised. Those of us who chose to build in Kensington did so believing that it was an upscale community, a nice place to live and one that would be consisting mainly of single family residents. We knew at the time what multi family residents were approved. Everything was clearly stated, and we made our decisions accordingly. This management group does not understand commitment. I have a very personal case where I think this commitment -- or lack of commitment is very clear. If you look at your diagrams, my lot, my home that's going up is in an estate area. It's Block C, Lot 3. You'll see eight lots. It's around the western midpoint in the High Street location. Directly across from that Block C, Lots 1 through 8, you'll see Block D, 1 through 7. I believe, at least that was the one Page 33 January 8, 1998 that was given to me when I bought. Those two parcels of land were tO be reserved for single family detached homes, minimum 2,800 square feet under air. They belong to the same homeowner's association group, and those who bought lots were given a thick manual with a set of covenants restricting what we could do, what we couldn't do and we understood that. We began building our home. I can tell you now there are probably, I believe, six or -- five or six homes going up. They're all in excess of $600,000, and I came to check on my house, which is again, Lot 3, Block C, in November. I came down. I'm living in New Jersey, and checking on the status of the house and happened to stop by the sales organization just to see how the overall development was going and I was told about a wonderful new product, duplex home.~ in Block D. Duplex homes in Block D, seven of them with -- they'r~ single family attached. They have many names for this, but the first brochure that came out showed duplex homes. These are homes less than 1,900 square ~eet under air. Actually, they vary between 17 something and 19 something. The prices run, list price, somewhere around 210, 220, and these homes are directly across the street in an area that was reserved for estate homes. That's not a commitment. Not only did I learn in November that there were 14 planned, but ten have already -- were reserved. They weren't sold, they were reserved. Now I understand another two are reserved. I can't get an answer from these people as to whether they're going to build them or not. The lots have been sold to a builder. The builder's put out his brochures. They've gotten 12 commitments on these -- oD these homes, and I learned recently the covenants were changed. I don't have any new covenants. They never informed me. These covenants were changed unde~ the cloak of darkness. We were never asked. We were never -- we didn't even have a vote. We couldn't even vote. This is -- this is our management. This is this group. This is the kind of commitments they have to people. When I learned in November about those duplex homes, I didn't know many people. In fact, I only knew two people at Kensington. I called several people. No one knew about duplexes. No one. That's an -- I'm under oath. No one that I called, and we wound up talking to maybe 25 residents, none of them knew of this change. I don't think that's fair. Now, maybe that's not a concern here. Under the PUD that was allowed -- I sat down with Miss Murray. She explained to me that within the PUD, they're allowed to build multi family or single family anywhere, as long as they don't mix. Well, they tried to mix earlier in the year at the northwest corner of the property. They tried to put these duplexes there, but they were rejected because you can't mix multi family and single family on a single platted land, so it worked down into an estate area. Now, they're saying that they're adding value. I still argue with these people, it doesn't add value to my property. Now, that's an argument you'll hear from these people. They spent a lot of time talking about all they've done concerning Grey Oaks, and I think that's honorable. They should. That's a neighbor, but they didn't Page 34 January 8, 1998 tell us anything. You have a lot of handouts. None of us had a handout at our meeting. It wasn't a meeting. They were telling us all the wonderful things they're doing for us. Never asked us what we wanted. I don't want to monopolize this thing, but the other question I have is, under the density issue of the units down at the southern end, I -- I still don't have an answer. I think that four people asked the same question, but if you allow -- if you look at the existing PUD with the constraints of single family homes, you should be able to calculate how many homes will be in that area. If you modify the PUD and look at it and look at the combination of multiple family and single family, it should add up to another number. Is that number greater with the new PUD or is it less with the PUD? I uhink that maybe would answer density, and that's all I have. MR. JOKNSON: My name is William Johnson. I, too, am a property owner in Kensington, probably as close to the south end of the property as --- as any existing privately owned properties get. I'm in Lot 37 in Block C, if your map depicts that. That's -- about at that curve is where the road presently ends. The communication, just to add a few remarks about the communication, because the petitioner alluded to how he's been communicating with the owners, it's -- my view of it is, it was ve~! poor and inadequate communication. The meeting that was referred to this past Tuesday evening, this issue -- this petition was, I would say, buried in about ten other matters and their presentation occupied probably -- of their presentation, 90 percent occupied all the other issues, yet when the audience had something to say, it was largely concerning this petition and it was a very heated, unhappy meeting. Turning to the staff's report, the very first page, requested action, I guess I have to take exception with the second line that goes on to say, to adopt a new PUD and master plan, and this I would underline, without essentially changing the land use strategy. I suggest to you that the land use strategy is changing very dramatically here, and let me emphasize why I believe that. I'm going to hand out an exhibit to you, if I may. What I've just given to you is a copy of this master plan, which was presented to me as a prospective buyer in the -- basically in the fall of 1995. This was the master plan I relied upon. It was the master plan I believe that is consistent with the commitment that was made that they now seek to -- to break. This is the -- probably resembles the exhibit that Miss Cawley provided you because it too shows 29 single family lots across the south border of -- contiguous with the southern border. As I studied my choices for purchase in this community, I was driven to select an area where I would have minimum traffic impact, and obviously I felt that the further back in the development I would position myself, the less traffic I would be exposed to. This plan contains, as you can see by my count, 454 units. You can sit there and count every unit that they were portraying would be built in this community. This is a -- this is a document that laid in piles in Page 35 January 8, 1998 their sales office for any prospective purchaser to come along and be led to understand what was to happen in this community, so I think it represents a commitment that now they stand before you seeking to break. As to the traffic counts that have been spoken to earlier, the plan you were given as the previous -- or currently existing master plan, obviously is not this plan, and I think if you were to conduct similar analyses of traffic counts using this plan, you would begin to see some very dramatic differences. I would also suggest to you that the layout of the existing road system does not accommodate the multi family development in the southern portion of the property. If you were to look -- and I think the staff was remiss in not considering this, if you were to look at many existing communities today, and I would refer you to the modern ones of the same era as Kensington, you would find that access to multi family areas are usually down large corridors, not passing through single family neighborhoods. As you can appreciate from reviewing not only the plan that I relied upon, but even the plans that they have presented, all of the traffic through -- to access the multi family area will be through and directly across the front of single family neighborhoods. It's not a situation, as is so often found today, where single family pods run off of a main thoroughfare and are, therefore, isolated from the direct traffic. So I would just close in saying that I think it's incumbent upon you to not continue to participate in this deception, but rather to require that the developer continue with their original commitment to stand by what had been promised to many, many buyers in this community, and now you, by this petition, would pull the rug out from under their feet. I would -- I would request that you deny this petition. Thank you. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I have a question. Dudley or Rich, you all handed out this that said current. This gentleman just handed us this. Obviously this road connects to this southern road on his. It does not on yours. Would you help us with that? MR. HENDERLONG: More than happy to. The map that Mr. Johnson presented to you is a concept plan, an earlier one that was generated. The same map I gave to you is also in the sales office. What you get, at the time that Mr. Johnson bought, was the best representation of the developer at the time for a concept plan. That is not binding upon anybody. What is binding is the PUD and that shows you -- those are unplatted lands that he presented to you. None of those have been platted in that way or fashion. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Thank you. COMMISSIONER BRUET: If you could kind of keep your comments to about five minutes, we'd appreciate it. MS. HOBERT: Sure. My name is Rosemary Hobert. Good morning, i am going to be a future resident in Kensington. My property is located in Block E, Lot 2. I am located near the single family attached proposed homes. I'm located in an area where some have Page 36 January 8, 1998 talked about possible impacts as far as traffic is concerned. While I speak to you today, my builder is preparing paperwork to submit for permits for my home in Kensington, which I plan to occupy this summer. Now, I will also tell you that I am currently at the central sales center where I'm employed. Prior to that, I worked with resale and new construction product for 12 years here in Naples. I have intimate knowledge of Kensington's first year of development, as my mother and former real estate partner was one of the first two salespeople at Kensington. My real estate experience and knowledge of Kensington brings me here as a very concerned future resident and equity golf member of Kensington. I can sell real estate anywhere in Naples. I want to live in Kensington. My home will not be the most expensive in Kensington. It will not be the least expensive in Kensington. Proportionately, my investment in Kensington is just as great as any of my neighbors. Because of my experience, I do understand the necessity for product diversity to complete Kensington before the developers and investors run out of money. I also understand that market value, resale value is determined by like product, by square footage and view, not by street address. I have the feeling that I'm probably going to be in the minority for those who came to speak to you in favor of what is being done in Kensington, and I'm sorry to tell you that today. I wish more were here. The very vocal minority that you're hearing, please also keep in mind that there are others, and I swear, too, I am under oath, I swear to you as well that there are also many, many people in Kensington who are happy with what is being done with the management team, happy with the communication they've tried to make. Perhaps it hasn't been as -- as good as some of the residents would like, but the attempt was made. I do not think that some of the people who speak to you today understand what might happen with Kensington and with where they are living if we are not able to make some changes so we can build out the community, someone doesn't come in and try and buy the community, take the 80 equity memberships that were purchased and buy them back and sell the club. We need to do this to finish the community so that we can all enjoy that community, and I think that the developer has done a very, very good job to try to make sure that those who are living in the estate area and in the single family home areas are not -- are not impacted by what's being done to any great extent. Thank you. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. Sir, I didn't get to see everyone who was sworn in. Did you stand up? Were you sworn in? MR. BARRY: Yes, I was. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you very much. MR. BARRY: I'm Joe Barry (phonetic) from Kensington. Been there a long time. I'm intrigued by the word commitment as though Mr. Oates, for example, resented getting recused from the board here, and yet he belongs to Grey Oaks. I don't understand that, and yet we're talking about commitment, as though nobody in the world ever changed a Page 37 January 8, 1998 plan. Is there anybody in this room who ever changed their mind, threw the first stone, I guess it said in the Bible? I'm confused by this harping on the word commitment. I, personally, think this new product is much better than the small single family homes they have there, and I do sense from Grey Oaks, and I'm sorry that they left, there's a kind of, well, an attitude coming from them that makes me uncomfortable. I won't enlarge on that, but I want to make a statement as a homeowner in Kensington that I think this is a much better product and I think that any impact it has on Grey Oaks is strictly in the minds of the people in Grey Oaks. It certainly isn't from me because I walk that pathway every day for an hour~ go right past that area, and I think this product is much, much superior. I think -- I disagree with Mr. Pinto. He's got some problems with something in his area, but to -- %2o make the broad generalizations he made makes Kensington look like a very disorganized, chaotic place, and I want to -- I think that's his opinion. I don't think that is universally shared. Thank you. COM/~ISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. Sir, you need to talk specifically to the issue, if you can. MR. STETKEWICZ: Yes. Okay. My name is Richard Stetkewicz (phonetic). I'm to be, in one of these next few days, a homeowner there at Kensington, and we're just talking about the actual, as they say, the original agreement between us and the builder there and the developer, to where they stated that the house and everything will be as such, a single family dwelling, and we expected to have everybody abide by this, but as it turned out, there's something going on in Lot D, I understand, that they're trying to change it from a single family to duplexes, and my wife and I are both strongly opposed to this. We have invested quite a bit of money into the situation, and now to find out that things have changed dramatically or are trying to change just doesn't seem right. It seems very unfair and I want to state this to you, and I do feel that with this extra amount of buildings down at the end that there's going to be quite a bit more traffic, which we are trying to minimize. Thank you. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. MR. OA?ES: My name is Ed Oates. I'd like to comment on the gentleman's remarks. Of course I'm affected. I stand -- stood up here and told you I live within 700 feet of what they're going to do, obviously. I can't vote on the issue, but I am an American citizen and I didn't give up my rights as an American citizen to be able to speak. I really resent his remarks because I don't think that they're germane to the issue at all and I hope you take that in consideration. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. MR. SUTHERLAND: I'd like to speak on the issue, but I have not been sworn in. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Yes, if you would, please, the court reporter will take care of that. MR. SUTHERLAND: My name is Ken Sutherland (phonetic). I'm a resident of Kensington, and I can speak on this issue because I'm currently building possibly the most expensive house in the Page 38 16G1 January 8, 1998 neighborhood, so if there's any impact of values, I certainly will feel it. Right from the beginning, it was my impression that the unsold lots were in a state of flux because, they hadn't been sold and that there were going to be some changes necessary to build out the neighborhood. I understood that and I certainly went in there with my eyes open. The most important thing to me is that the neighborhood gets completed and that the developer who's currently there continues to develop because he has a personal interest. I would hate to see a corporate builder come in there, somebody in Chicago dictating what my neighborhood is going to look like. This particular plan meets with what I expected to have for a mixed use neighborhood because that's what we have, and I golf with gentleman who live in $200,000 condos and are planning on bui3ding million dollar houses and we enjoy each other and that's the kind of neighborhood that we wanted to be in. I would fully appreciate if this board would pay attention to what I consider the majority.of the residents of Kensington who are very, very happy to live there and would like to see this neighborhood continue as it is currently planned. Thank you. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. MR. BROWN: I've been sworn in. My name is Tom Brown. I live on Block E, right against World Golf Community (sic). I have a separation buffer which is very nice of about probably five feet. I mean, I'm practically on top of World Golf Center (sic) and I barely see it and there are two story buildings right across f~om me, right in my back yard, and I mean, after one drink, I never even notice they're there. COMMISSIONER BRUET: It's great to have a fallback, you know. MR. BROWN: So you have to get real about this. When you're talking about a buffer zone between Grey Oaks and Kensinqton, that's what buffers are for. I have lived in this community for 12 years. I just recently moved from south Gordon Drive at the beach, and vegetation is what is used effectively to accomplish that purpose, and what Kensington is proposing is really well beyond what the PUD requires. I just don't think you can be 700 feet away from something and say, gee, I'm offended by an A1 Bateman project. I have three dear friends that live in -- in their condos and they're absolutely gorgeous units, both from the rear and the front and I would support their building -- building that, and what this gentleman just said, I would support his comment about building out the property. There's nothing worse for devaluation of your house than a vacant lot next to you year after year and that's a fact of life. Traffic-wise, I just want to comment on that. No one's going to be affected by traffic more than I am where I am living. Nobody that's spoken to you today, other than this one gentleman over here, lives on High Street and I live on High Street. In fact, I live in the last house on High Street going south as it's currently finished. At least half the traffic that is going to be on the south border Page 39 January 8, 1998 there along Grey Oaks is going to go the other way to begin with. They're going to go out the Kensington Road exit or they're going to go around the other way to the current main entrance, and that's just a fact of life. People take the most direct way out. Right now, I have trucks going by and things like that. It just doesn't bother me. We're talking about minor, minor things here. We're talking about objections. I'll conclude my comments by saying that this management team here has done, in my opinion, a sterling job of -- of an effort to communicate with the community. Information has been available. There's nothing I've heard Tuesday or in the past that was new to me, but I like to be informed of what's going on in the community and all I've ever had to do was ask the question. There's never been any surprises to me personally, and I can't help it if somebody wa3. ks in and is handed a proposed map that was made two or three years ago and believes that that's the end of the product line,, because no development here, Windstar, you name it, I don't care what you name, stays the same statically over a five or six year period. I mean, you get these changes in front of you all the time. So thank you very much for your courtesy in hearing me out and I hope you'll consider this petition favorably because it's in the best interest of Kensington and I don't believe it has any negative impact on Grey Oaks. It is in their minds. Thank you. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. MS. ROSEWATT: My name is Elizabeth Rosewatt (phonetic). I'm so new here, I don't even rate a red dot on that map. I've been in this area now three weeks and I respect the burden that's fallen on six members of this committee, three had to be released, to make a dec~sion on the community I chose to live in. I chose Kensington. I love Kensington. I want the best for Kensington. I fault Kensington's management, and they've heard it from me personally. Their communication to the residents -- they are selling a product. I bought a home. They need to communicate with us more. I arrived at a meeting Tuesday. Today is, what, Thursday, and discovered three changes for the first time, surprise. Tom's been around a lot longer. We're neighbors. He sees it differently. He asks the right questions. I don't feel I should be asking questions. I propose that this development has to go forward, but maybe that wall of condos at the back line is not the best. Maybe there should be a modification.. Multi family's okay in my book. I'm down at the bitter end, but maybe the buildings have to look different. Not four or seven of the same building, but maybe we could architecturally design them just a wee bit differently. We truly need multi, mixed family developments, but I respect the burden on your shoulders. I'd request from Kensington better communication, and to maybe just appease Grey Oaks and some of the members of Kensington, we could modify the architectural design of those lower buildings. Thank you. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. If you want to respond. If you could just make it very quick, Dudley. Page 40 16G1 ' January 8, 1998 MR. GOODLETTE: I certainly will, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate your indulgence, and let me first of all say that, to the extent that you have heard comments about communications and lack of communications and some people feel as though it's -- it's, you know, it's not baa but could be better, some people apparently feel it's not good at all, I personally will -- will assure you that we will do everything within our power as a management team to enhance, increase, improve the communications with our residents. It's not a happy occasion for us as the -- as the developers of this project to come and have four of our residents speak for our project and four of our residents speak against a project. We'd obviously like all eight of them to speak for in it in harmony, but you understand that -- and those of you -- all of you have been on this commission for quite some time, it's unusual to have residents come and speak for a petition like this, and we appreciate the fact that -- and we think -- and we appreciate it because we think it's important for to you realize that there are some issues. The issues Mr. Stetkewicz and Mr. Pinto raised, believe me, I have dealt with Mr. -- talked with Mr. Pinto, and on a very courteous basis. I've talked to a couple of lawyers on his behalf. We will continue to try to identify with and deal with the issues that he and Mr. -- that concern the two of them. They have nothing to do with the petition before you today, however, Mr. Chairman, and members of this commission. I really don't have anything else to offer other than -- than to reiterate in conclusion that we sincerely believe that the -- that there is no wall of condominium -- of condos, as has been alluded to at this podium by others. We've shown you a diagram and we've shown you Row few buildings really are along that southerly perimeter. This is not going to be a wall of condominiums, and -- and that site plan assures you of that and -- and Russell -- or Mr. Priddy, in conjunction with your question of Miss Cawley, and that is on Tract B, we would make a commitment to you this morning that with -- if you would vote to approve these petitions before you, we will make a commitment that Tract B will be single family residential. I think that's responsive to your concern, and we hope that that's -- that that's in keeping with what you were -- the kind of a commitment that you were looking for and we're prepared to make that commitment as we stand before you this morning. We appreciate your attention. We realize this has been a lengthy discussion and -- and we urge you to approve the petition, and Mr. Chairman, coming back to where I started, if you'd like to bifurcate this, because there has not been any controversy about the addition of the .98 acres to accomplish our cart barn issue, and then if -- because some people on the panel may feel differently about one or both of those issues. Thank you again for your time and we appreciate your attention. MR. HENDERLONG: Just one last moment, Mr. Chairman and we'll be off. To help clarify that single family, we will limit that to 15 units at 100 widths, and then also be aware that Tract A has multi Page 41 January 8, 1998 family -- a seDarate neighborhood from some of the other communities, just to make that point of clarification. Thank you. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. Is there anyone else wishing to speak on this issue? Don, have you got a question? COMMISSIONER YORK: It's been answered. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Therefore, I call the hearing closed, throw it out for panel discussion. I guess I could start to lead. I -- it's a difficult issue. I certainly can respect Grey Oaks' concerns about changing the density adjacent to their property lines, but I also respect the ability of a developer who needs to be sensitive to the market and he needs to have some flexibility, and I guess that's really what we're here to talk about, what kind of flexibility. I certainly think that landscape-wise, architecturally, bufferings that they are proposing is very sufficient. I certainly support reducing Tract B to single family, and that's a view from here. Anyone else? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I -- I will echo all of that. I'm still a little hung up on the, you know, the commitment deal and the reliance that was put on that by the, you know, by the neighbors. I certainly think that, you know, Tract B being single family is a -- is a pretty nice compromise in there, but I still have some concerns with the up-front commitment. COMMISSIONER YORK: Well, I'd just -- just a comment. I was going to vote against it because I thought, you know, the non-use of Tract B in there, but I still think it's of significant impact to a comnvitment that was made a long time ago and I do understand the changes, but you know, I could support the current Wellington Place Tract A and Tract D, but I think the impact is just too much with -- including Tract C in there too. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I do the arithmetic and I find that with the single family homes, you had -- along that road, or even on to the lake, you had 78 units, and when you get to the condominium or the townhouses, you end up, I think it is, with a hundred and forty something and -- or a hundred and eighty something. That's quite a big difference in density, as far as I can see. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I don't -- I donlt see a density -- I don't see a density concern because the density doesn't change in the bottom part of that development. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Well, if you count the number of lots in a single family development, you come up with 78. If you count the number of units in the proposal that's shown here on the, I guess we'd call them coach homes or townhomes, you come up with 186. That's -- that's a lot, I think. You know, a big difference in density. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I -- I would tend to look across there though with the footprint -- with their new proposed footprint and look at buildings that are going to be even within a couple hundred feet of that south property line and I think, you know, you, to some Page 42 January 8, 1998 extent, minimize that with the new concept, and again, I'm probably not going to support that because of the commitment range, but I have to concede that, you know, they have done an excellent job and Grey Oaks would probably not be affected by, you know, what was actually built under that -- that footprint that they're proposing. COMMISSSONER WRAGE: Mr. Chairman, I have probably changed my vote about 14 times this morning. COMMISSIONER BRUET: It is difficult. COMMISSIONER YORK: It's very difficult. COMMISSIONER WRAGE: And generally I get more angry each time I do it. Let me approach this from a different aspect as a private citizen having looked at a lot of these when I moved to Naples not too long ago. I do believe, and having been a real estate agent ir my former life, realize that they say a lot of things, and in certain ways, indicate what something is going to be, but I will probably not support the amendment as presented even with Tract B. I guess my suggestion is, go back to the drawing board. I see nothing wrong with what they originally proposed. I realize markets change. We're talking about developer's money here. I'm not going to support the amendment. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Well, again, you know, changing market, I think, is very important in our industry and not being able to do that would be very difficult. COMMISSIONER BUDD: I had the same number of vote changes as Mr. Wrage, give or take a couple, and I currently find myself in the same position. I'm not comfortable with the reversal on the commitment that was made years ago. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: With that, Mr. Chairman, I'd make the motion that we approve Petition PUD-91-11, parens 1, with the addition for the golf course facility, if we want to vote on that. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Yes. COMMISSIONER YORK: You're taking the 9olf course facility separate? COMMISSIONER BRUET: Yes, we're 9oing to put that behind us. That's going to be a separate vote, separate issue? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Right. COMNISSIONER BRUET: Okay. So your motion is dealing with -- COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: All the other approvals except for the change az the southern end. COMMISSIONER BRUET: There is a motion. Is there a second. COMMISSIONER BUDD: Second. COMMISSIONER BRUET: All those in favor? Opposed? COMMISSIONER BRUET: Aye. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: And then I would move that we not approve the redevelopment of the southern portion. COMMISSIONER BUDD: Second. COMMISSIONER BRUET: There is a motion. All those in favor? Opposed? COMMISSIONER BRUET: Aye. Page 43 i iii iiiii III I II I II IIIIII I I I II IIII I IIII II I II I - I I January 8, 1998 COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: And with a -- with a comment, excellent job, but if you all could somehow come back with a development scheme to leave single family along that bottom line and do the exact same project on the north side of your road, I think everyone would be happy. MR. GOODLETTE: We appreciate your attention, members of the commission. (A brief recess was had.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: We'll now call the next petition, V-97-14 and ask all those present that may want to speak on this petition, please stand and raise your right hand so the court reporter may swear you in. (Speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Ms. Murray? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: We don't have any questions. COMMISSIONER YORK: As a ~- I would like to divulge that I did have a conversation nn this particular issue with Garrett Richter from First National Bank of Naples. COMMISSIONER OATES: I received a fax from Mr. Richter. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I received a fax from Mr. Richter. COMMISSIONER BRUET: I did also, Mr. Chairman. COMMISSIONER WRAGE: So did I. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Gee, I didn't. COMMISSIONER WRAGE: No respect. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I guess I don't count. I'll remember that. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: There's a no vote. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I also received one, so I can't help you there. -With that, Ms. Murray? MS. MURRAY: I'm going to keep it short and sweet. The applicant is requesting a 40 foot variance in order to cover two existing parking spaces in the northwest corner of an existing site that's developed with a bank building. Upon staff's analysis consistent with the required criteria in the Land Development Code, staff cannot recommend that the Collier County Planning Commission forward this with a recommendation for approval to the Board of County Commissioners because it is inconsistent with the required findings in the Land Development Code. I'd also like to point out, just as a point of interest, with our new architectural standards, had this structure been -- or this proposed structure been permitted that they were going to Duild it within the required setbacks, they would have to be architecturally compatible if they were built simultaneously today, the bank building and the canopy structure. Just a note that -- that based on what's out there now, they really are not architecturally comDacible as proposed. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Questions of staff? COMMISSIONER WRAGE: Just briefly, what do you mean in terms of what is not compatible, the color, the size? MS. MURRAY: The colors, the type of material used, the Page 44 January 8, 1998 architectural detailing on the bank building, as well as all of the buildings in that commercial development, commercial area. COMMISSIONER BRUET: I understand as per this -- per the staff report this is a domed structure? MS. MURRAY: That's correct. I believe Mr. Hobart handed you a graphic illustrating the structure. This is the first I've seen of it. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I didn't get one of those either. I'm voting no. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I think Mr. Hobart is passing those out now. All right. With there being no questions of staff, I guess, Mr. Hobart, if you'd like to make a presentation. M~. HOBART: Thank you. My name is John Hobart and I'm the architect of the original building and I'm here to represent First National Bank for the -- on the variance for the covered parking. A couple of things that I'd like to bring out, and that is, the -- the bank is on an out-parcel site which is part of the shopping center that's located on Vanderbilt Beach Road and North Tamiami Trail and the covered parking will actually be over two spaces that are located in the northwest corner of the bank site. Now, the property lines -- the west property line and the north property line are actually interior property lines within the -- within the total shopping center development and what -- what I passed out to you is -- is a -- what I tried to do is sort of overlay to show you what -- what we have in mind as far as -- as far as the covered parking and it's -- it will be domed and it will be of a green color to, more or less, blend in with the landscaping and we, of course, would not enclose it in any way so that it would -- it would -- hopefully, the point is to make it a part of -- of an open area around the landscaping so that you can view through it. Now, the height of the -- the particular canopies will be about eight and a half to, maximum, nine feet, and I don't even see it going up that high, so the -- the -- since the bank is a newly constructed building, the landscaping is -- is young landscaping. Eventually, of course, within the prescribed period of time, the landscaping will -- will fill out and will tend to break up the -- this canopy structure somewhat. Now, if the -- if the board feels that they're uncomfortable with too much view of the canopy, we certainly would be open to improve on the landscaping that is around that canopy to -- to further obstruct this view. I don't think we should totally enclose it because I think if we totally enclose it, I think that would be more of a -- of a visual -- unappetizing visual view than trying to leave some openness there in the corner. Just a little bit more information. As far as the distance of the canopy from the North Tamiami Trail property line, that's about 200 feet. The distance from the south property line, which is another parcel other than what the shopping center has, is about 150 feet, so we're well within the complex of the shopping center, and so we -- we hope that you find -- find any -- anything that would be Page 45 16G1 January 8, 1998 objectionable, we would like to hear your views. We certainly can make any adjustment to it, but we would -- we would hope that you would find -- find an approval an appropriate measure. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. York? COMMISSIONER YORK: I don't have any problems with the covered parking. The -- where my office is, they too had applied for a variance of some covered parking, but the parking was built to architecturally blend with the building that's there and that's at the Newgate Center, and I don't have any problems with the covered parking. I would support it, but I think it ought to architecturally be compatible with the bank that's there as opposed to, you know, a -- what I would consider -- from the picture, it looks like kind of a temporary structure. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Oates? COMMISSIONER OATES: Yeah, I was gonna take on that too, that particular instance. I don't mean to be insulting of your work, Mr. Hobart, but it's a rather cheesy looking thing from what this picture shows, at least in my opinion, for a beautiful bank and a beautiful location, and secondly, my fax from Garrett Richter says that WCI has approved it. Do we have a letter of approval or anything? MS. MURRAY: Yes. I was gonna mention that. MR. HOBART: There should be a letter in your packet of approval. COMMISSIONER OATES: I beg your pardon. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Priddy? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Yeah, I, too, would support that, and if this structure were at my house, it probably would be very appropriate, but I don't think -- I think we need to -- I'll support the covered parking, but we need to severely beef up the architectural standards of this and -- along with the additional landscaping to further buffer -- buffer that. That's not nearly nice enough for the guys that are going to be parking under it. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bruet? COMMISSIONER BRUET: Yeah. We've worked with the bank on covered parking at Collier Place I, and it's a very appropriate structure. You may be familiar with it. It would certainly be more appropriate here, or perhaps if the motion could incorporate that type design or something to that effect along with the additional landscaping, I have a sense here that it probably could get approved if you'd be willing -- if that sounds -- MR. HOBART: Well, I think we would be willing to -- to go in that direction. The cheesy look -- COMMISSIONER OATES: I'm sorry, I didn't mean to -- MR. HOBART: No, I don't have a problem with that. I'm not that sensitive, but -- but our attempt there was to try to reduce the -- the -- any kind of a building impact in that corner and to sort of lighten it up, and I guess we lightened it up too much. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I think maybe some -- some col%arms where your little poles are and -- and maybe some -- some little fancy design on the canopy part might, you know, might help. I don't know. COMMISSIONER YORK: Well, if you look at the ones out at Newgate Page 46 1 January 8, 1998 Center, it's a metal roof, very well desiqned with some stucco on it and very -- really quite attractive. COMMISSIONER OATES: Maybe we could conditionally approve it and ask that they come back to the staff to -- to look at maybe Mike's parking and Don's parking to kind of come along with -- COMMISSIONER BRUET: That's a good idea. MR. MULHERE: If the motion just says architecturally compatible with the existing structure and enhanced landscaping to minimize the visual impacts from surrounding properties, we'll be able to work with them. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: So moved. COMMISSIONER OATES: Second. MR. HOBART: Just another comment from me and that is, I think we would -- well, I would do away with the canvas cover altogether. I think the important thing would be to pick up the roof material from what the building has. COMMISSIONER BKUET: That'd be great. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: And a four or six inch column. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Is there anyone else that wants to speak on this petition? Seeing none, I'll close the hearing. COMMISSIONER WRAGE: Wait a minute. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes? MR. LINDSAY: I would like to speak CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Please come forward, Mr. Lindsay, and you'll need to be sworn. (Speaker was sworn.) MR. LINDSAY: My name is James Lindsay. I'm a director of the bank% and the only concern I had is about the required landscaping. I know that the staff had, at the end of their report, had left the door open in the event that the -- the covered parking was approved and they had requested that we put in a ten foot high landscape barrier and I'm not so sure that would be compatible to what's out there and I just would like to bring that up for discussion. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Well, my thought was -- is to talk -- Ms. Murray, what class buffer do they have there now? MR. MULHERE: Looks like a ten foot buffer. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: What would be the next notch up? MR. MULHERE: Well, they can't increase the width because there's parking on either side, so what we're talking about is enhanced vegetation within there. It looks like there could be certainly a few more trees -- MS. MURRAY: More dense vegetation rather than -- it's pretty open right now. MR. MULHERE: I mean, it's nice landscaping and it's probably going to grow. My suggestion is, we'll talk to Nancy, see if she has any thoughts. I don't want to put any, you know, ten foot or -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Hobart made -- I thought, made an excellent point in that part of the idea here was to keep the view fairly open so that the structure didn't have much impact and I agree, certainly Page 47 I III Illl II III IIIII II I I IIIIIIII II ............................... II ' II I! January 8, 1998 some architectural upgrades to make it compatible with the building makes sense, but -- HR. MULHERE: I think the landscaping is there. It will grow soon enough. It's pretty nice. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah, because we're looking at pretty new, immature vegetation, so -- MS. MURRAY: I think my comment was more directed at the fact that this was definitely not architecturally compatible with the existing building. In order to screen it, let's put in some pretty substantial landscaping. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. With that, we'll close the public hearing, and Mr. Priddy, I think you had tried to make a motion before, if you would like to do so. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: You think I can remember that far back, do you? I would move petition V-97-14 be conditionally approved with architectural standards matching that of the existing building. COMMISSIONER OATES: Second. COMMISSIONER YORK: And no requirement for landscaping? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I don't -- no, I think the landscaping is going to grow and if they match the -- the covered parking with the building, then I think not putting more landscaping may, in fact, be better. COMMISSIONER YORK: Can we make that architecturally compatible rather than -- COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Architecturally compatible with the existing building. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Discussion on the motion? I'm sorry, the motion was by Mr. Priddy, recommendation of approval, seconded, was it by Mr. COMMISSIONER OATES: Oates. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- Oates. With that, all those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Aye. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: So the vote was three -- six -- seven to one, Mr. -- COMMISSIONER PEDONE: No, I voted yes. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I'm sorry. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I just wanted to be the last one to vote. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Apparently, we're adjourned. There'being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 11:06 a.m. Page . 16Gl" ' January 8, 1998 COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING BY: Heather L. Casassa Page 49 Hancock Coastant Sne sac 'ri, V' ' AGENDA Berry )./', ,, COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY. FEBRUARY 19, 1998 IN TIlE ~OARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEET~G ROOM. ADMINISTRATION ~UII.DING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER. ~()I TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST. EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA: SOTE:ANY PERSON WHO DECIDED TO APPEAL A DECISION OF Tills ~OARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE. WI[IClt ~CORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WIIICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL ~ECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL ~E AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE ~OARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. I. ROLL CALL ~Y CLER~ 2. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA ~. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: J~ua~ 15, 1998 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: 6. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 7. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Pemion No. V-07-15. Kenneth D. Goodman. representing Lana S. Chadwick. requesting an 0.5 Ibot after- the-fact variance l}om l}~e required 30 foot sMe yard setback for the principal structure, along the south property line ~o 20.5 l~et: a 4.0 foot after-the-fact variance from ~e required 30 foot side yard setback for an aecesso~ structure, along the south prope~ line to 26 feet; a 13.3 foot variance I~om the reqmred 30 foot side yard selback Ibr a tenms court along fie north prope~ line. to 16.7 feet: and a 2.0 foot after-the-fact variance from the required slmcture-to-stmcmre setback of I0 feet for ~he separation benveen the principal structure and a tenms court, to 8 feet for prope~ located at 118 Cajeput Drive, further described as Lot 14. Block L. Pine Ridge Extension. ~Coordinator: Fred Reischl) (Continued from the meeting of Febma~ 5. 1998} B. Petition No. BD-98-1, Miles 1,. Scofield. representing Donald M. Chunlla requesting an 18 foot boat dock extension to allow for two {2) boat slips and ~o (2) boat li~ pro,ding 38 feet into the wate~'ay, for prope~ located at 80 Sou~pon Cove. ~er de~chbed as Lot 10. Sou~po~ On ~e Bay. Unit 1. in Section 6, Township 48 South. ~nge 25 East. (Coordi~tor: ~am Ba~m~chian} C. Petition No. V-97.18. Daniel and Margaret Kelly requesting a 22.9 foot a~r-the.fact variance from the required side yard setback of 30 feet to 7.1 feet for property located at 6831 Sandalwood Lane. further described as the ,.,,'est 150 feet of Tract 37. Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 35. iCoordinator: Ray Bellows) D. Petition No. R.97-12. Shane and Cindi Mclntosh, requesting a rezone from RSF-4 to C- I for a professional office building tbr property, located on Goodlette Road between 13~' Avenue North and 14'~ Avenue North. located in Section 34. Township 49 South. Range 25 East. Collier County., Florida. consisting of .68 acres. (Coordinator: Ray Bellowsl E. Petition No. PUD-97-17, Bruce J. Siciliano. AICP, of Agnoli, Barber & Brundage. inc.. and Attorney Dudley Goodlene of Goodlette. Coleman & Johnson, P.A., representing Amerada iless Corporation and Garrett F.X. Beyrent and TeD'l Brezski. requesting a rezone from "E" l'.'states to PUI) to be known as Pine Ridge Corners PUD, for highway-oriented and convenience commercial uses for property, located on the north side of Pine Ridge Road and west of 1-75, further described as Tract 77, Golden Gate Estates. Unit 35. in Section 7. Township 4q South, Range 26 East. Collier County, Florida. consisting of 4.38 acres, more or less. tCoordinator: Ray P, ellows~ F. Petition No. PUD-87-3113L Timothy W. Ferguson and Dominic Gadaleta representing SJG Land Trust. requesting a rezone l¥om "PI ~'D" In "PI :D" fi~r thc Planned Unit Development known as Gadalcta. having the ct'IZ':t of amending the cJadaleta [DUD m response to requirements or' Section 2.7.3.4 of the Land Development Code, Rcsolution 97-134, for property located on the west s~de of Old Tamiam~ Trail North/Old U.S. 41 North {C.R. 867) and immediately contiguous the Lee County boundary, line in Section 10, Township 48 South. Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, containing 19.3 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Ron Nino} {Continued from tile meeting of February 5, 1998) G. Petition No. PSP-97.20, Dwight Nadeau of MeAnly Engineering and Design, Inc., representing Berkshire Capital, Inc.. requesting Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval for Berkshire Pines, Phase 2, located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard and north of Radio Road in Section 33, Township 49 South. Range 26 East, consisting of 82-45 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) It. Petition No. I'UD-87-14(3), ..klan D. Reynolds, AICP of Wilson, Miller, Barlon & Peek, inc., requesting an amendment to Ordinance No. 92-23, as amended, for the purpose of increasing the authorized gross floor area from 65,000 sq. ft. to 72.000 sq. ft. in the Wilson Professional Center PUD, located on the southwest comer of Airport-Pulling Road and Bailey lane, in Section 23, Township 49 South. Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida, containing 7.8 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Ron Nino} I. Petition No. PUD-92-5(2). ,',,lark W. Minor of Q. Grady Minor & Associates. P.A.. representing Community Development Corporation of Sterling Oaks, requesting an amendment to the Sterling Oaks PUD. Ordinance No. 92-79. as amended, for the purpose of clarifying development standards establishing setbacks, and space between buildings for property located within the Sterling Oaks PUD which is located south of the Lee County line between U.S. 41 and Old 41, in Section 9 & 10, Township 48 South. P, ange 25 East. Collier County, Florida. containing 247.89 acres. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 1 I. ADJOURN 9/98 CCPC AG ENDA/md 6G1 ' January 15, 1998 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida, January 15, 1998 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Planning Commission in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Michael A. Davis Russell Priddy Russell Budd Michael J. Bruet Donald J. York Edward J. Oates Gary Wrage Michael Pedone ALSO PRESENT: Marjorie M. Student, Assistant County Attorney Ron Nino, Planning Services Robert Mulhere, Planning Services Page AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, JANUARY 15, 1998 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTEI~ 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE:ANY PERSON WHO DECIDED TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. I. ROLL CALL BY CLERK 2. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: 5. BCC REPORT 6. CHAIRM. AN'S REPORT 7. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: ' A. Petition No. BD-97-27, Miles L. Scofiel& re~resenting Richard A. Sclamidt~ requestiug a 5 foot boat dock exte~ion to allow for a 25 foot boat dock and boat lit~ for pr~:~ty located at 237 Bayfront Drive, further described as Lot 13, Bayfront Ga~det~, ia Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. (Coordinator: Fred P~ischl) B. Petition No. PDI-97-g, Bruce Tyson, AICP, of Wilso~ Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., repr~en~g CFS-I Pavilion Ltd., requesting an insubstantial change deten~i~stion to the Pavilion Shopping Center PUD Master Plan by creating an outparcel for property located ia the northwest quadrant of Vanderbilt Beach Road (C.R. 862) and Tamiami Trail North (U.S. 41), ia Section 33, Township 48 South, Range 25 Ea"t, Collier County, Florida. (Coordlnntor: Ray Bellows) 16G1 C. Petition 1'4o. PUD-9?-12, William L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover Pl2~i-g Shopp¢ and Beau Keene. P.E.. o! Green, Econo & Erek. Inc., representing Frank Clcsea & Sons, lac., requesting a rezone from "E" Estates to "PUD" to bc known as Clesen PUD for commercial usea, for propo'ty located on the north side of Pine Ridge Road (C.R. 896), '/, mile east of the inter, cc!ion of Pine Ridge Road (C.IL 896) and Whippoorwill Lane. ~ Section 7, Township 49 South, Range 26 Fast, consisting of 4.33 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Bryan. D. Petition No. PUD-83-1?(1), Community Development and Environmental Services Division representin.~ the Board of County Comrmssioners requesting an amtmdment to the Ford Motor Company Vehicle Evaluation Center PUD for the purpose of permitting testing of all typ~ of motor vehlcl~ and permitting communication tower for property located north of Alligator Alley (1-'/5) and east of Golden Gate Estates Sections 22, 27 and 34. Township 49 South, P,~age 28 F.~t, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 530.3? acres, more or leu. (Coordl-2ton Wlyae Arnold) E. Petition No. PUD-87-31(3), Timothy W. Ferguson and Dominic Gadaleta represeofng S.IG Land Trust requesting a rezone from "PUD" to "PUD" for the Planned Unit Development known a~ Gadaleta, having the effect of amending the Gaclaleta PUD in response to requirements of Section 2.7.3.4 of the Lane Development Code. Resolution 97-134, for property located on th':. west side of Old Tamiami Trai North/Old U.S. 41 North (C.R. 867) and immediately contiguous the Lee County boundary line in Sectiot I0, Township 48 South. Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, containing 19.3 acres, more or less (Coordinator: Ron Nino) (Contmued to the Meeting of February 5, 1998) F. Petition No. PUD-97-16. MeAnly Engineering & Design, Inc., representing Toll Brothers, Inc., requesting: r,:zone from "PUD' (C~a Del Sol Golf & Country Club) and 'A" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to b, known as Naples for:st Country Club for a mixed use community connoting of no great~'r then 785 rnixe~ residential dwelling units; golf course, clubhouse and related recreatiorud amenities: and 150,000 square fee of commercial floor space for property located at the northwest quadrant of C.R. 951 and Rardesnake Hanu'nock Road (C.R. 864) in Section 15, Tow~hip 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida containing 485 acres, more or leu. (Coordinator: Rom Nino) G. Petition No. PUD-9?-18, K,'~ren Bishop of Project Management Services Inc., rrpresentmg Signamr Communities. Inc.. requesting a rezone from RMF*6, RMF-12, RMFI2ST and RM~-i6 !o PUD to b known as Wiggfns Pass Landings Planned Unit Development for a raa~imt~rn of 531 multi-fanUly dweilin: unzts, located on the northwest comer of I I Ia Avenue North (Bluebill Avenue - also known as C.R. ~46 and Vanderbilt Drive (C.R. 901), further described as Lots [ the 10. Block I. all ofBlock 2 and Lots I thr~ 16, Block 3. WiggU~ Pass Landings Unit #I. and Lots I thru 4, Block I, Wiggins Pass iandings Unit Addition, m Section 20. Tow~hlp 48 South, ILange 2S EasL coasist~g of 88.5 acres, more or les.~ (Coordinator: Ron Nino) H. Petition No. PDI-97-7, Barbara H. Cawley, AICP, of Wilson, Miller, Ba.,'ton & Peek. Inc., reprtsentm.. Grey Oaks Development Corporation, requesling an insubstantial c,hange detern':mation :o the Grey O.'~k PUD by revising the Master Plan to move rune holes of a goff course from the southeast quadrant to th, northwest quadrant of the project, in Section 25, Tow~hip 49 South, Range 2S East. (Coorriin:~tor: Ro: Nino) (Continued Indet'mite) I. Petition No. PUD-84-?(6), George L. Varnadoe ofYoung, vanAuenderp & Varnadoe, P.A., represennng [ Y Associates Joint Venture. a Florida General Parmership, for a rezone from "PUD" Planned Un: Development and "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD' Planned Uni! Development. having the effect amending the Fiddler's Creek portion of the Marco Shores PUD and adding 1,38S acres thereto whil holding constant the currently authorized number of dwelling units, n~rnely 6,000 for the fiddler's Cree: portion of the Marco Shores PUD lying in Sections l], 14, IS, 22, 23 and 24, Town.ship ;51 South, Range East and Sections 18, 19 and 29, Township $1 South, Range 27 Fast, Collier County, Florida, comL~ting 3,763.99 ach:s, more or leu. (Coordinator:. Roa Nitro) (Compamoa to DOA-97-3) (Contmued to th Meeting of February 5, 1998) .............. ,, mm.earl iii I I I III IIIIIII III I IIIIIIII II II II II I $. Petition No. DOA-97-3, George L. Yamadoe ofYouag, vlaAsseoderp & Vamadoe. PR.. reprusentmg D Y Associates Joint Ventu~. · Florida Geoeral Panaermhip, for la smeodmeut to thc Marco Short,Fiddler: Creek Development Order 84o3, as Imeuded for the purpose of adding 1.385 acres to thc Fiddler's Crce~ portion of said dcvelopmeut order, lad compauion Plmmed Unit Development zomug regulation, and t~ adopt · new Master Plan for said added area while lea.Aug cous~t thc currently authorized number o dweLliug units, namely 6.000 for the Fiddler's Creek portion of Marco Shores. said additional laud area i: located in Section 18, 19 and 29, Town.ship SI South, l~uge 27 East, Collier County, Honda (Coordln.t~r, Ron Nino) (Come.ion m PUD-~[-7(6)) (Conti,~ued to February S, 1998) 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 11. ADJOURN 1/I$~8 CCPC AGENDA/md 3 16G1 January 15, 1998 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Call this meeting to order. We'll begin by calling the roll. Mr. Pr iddy? MR. PRIDDY: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Budd? MR. BUDD: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bruet? MR. BRUET: Present. CHAIRM~N DAVIS: Davis, here. Mr. York? MR. YORK: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Oates? MR. OATES: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Pedone? MR. PEDONE: Here. CHAIRMA/~ DAVIS: Mr. Wrage? MI{. WRAGE: Here. CHAIRM3~N DAVIS: Concerning addenda to the agenda, it appears that we need a Motion to Continue Item H indefinitely, Items E, I and J to February 5th. MR. PRIDDY: So moved MR. YORK: Second. CHAIRM3uN DAVIS: Motion by Mr. Priddy, seconded by Mr. York. Discussion? All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRM3uN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. Approval of minutes. I don't think we had any. 'MR. YORK: No. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any planned commission absences? MR. OATES: As I told you before, I'll be gone the 19th of February. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Mulhere, anything in the way of a BCC report? I happened to catch a little bit of the commission meeting last night and I noticed that they approved the personal storage at Santa Barbara. MR. MULHERE: Four to one. Actually, I guess, the day before yesterday. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes. MR. MULHERE: Yes, I believe all of those petitions were approved, ultimately were approved as recommended by the Planning Commission. That was the, I think, really the only petition that had considerable discussion. But ultimately it was approved four to one with Commissioner Constantine in the minority. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Under chairman's report, I talked with Jim Rideoutte, Chairman of the Planning Advisory Board, City of Naples, and they met earlier this week and unanimously approved a joint workshop with us on January 29th from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. at the Development Services; I believe it's conference room E? MR. MULHERE: Yes, conference room E. I don't know if all of you Page 2 January 15, 1998 have been to the Development Services. MR. OATES: That's the big one? MR. MULHERE: It's the large conference room in the back. i'll have that door open so if you want to park in the front and walk through that door close to the conference room. MR. YORK: I will not be at that. MR. BRUET: Time again, Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. Mr. Rideoutte and I spoke briefly about two items, which I've relayed to Mr. Mulhere, Mr. Mulhere is going to be in touch with Missy McKim, his counterpart with the city and I'm going to put a call in to Commissioner Pam Mac°Kie to see if there is any ideas she might have about topics. One we talked about was common borders. For instance, areas of 41 North up in the Park Shore Drive area, where one side is c~unty, one side is city. That that may have some interest to -- one. frustration that Jim expressed to me was that sometimes they feel -- I think it's one we probably share -- that we sit here in judgment of petitions and don't really get a lot of time to do pure planning. And so that was something we thought we'd chat a little bi~ about, too. I don't know if there's a solution to that one or not. But one to raise. And I'd suggest if you have any additional topics that come to mind, you might want to give Bob a call and let him know about them, so that we can touch on them in that discussion. MR. MULHERE: We'll be preparing an agenda pretty quickly Decause we need to get some sort of advertisement into the paper. But we can always add on, if there's something that comes up after that time frame. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Sure. It'll provide an opportunity for open discussion; tha~ can be our catch-all. But this, as far as we know, will be the first ever joint workshop between our two boards, and I'm looking forward to it. I think that will be an interesting discussion, certainly. MR. OATES: I would hate to correct the chairman, but this happened many, many years ago. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Really? MR. GATES: Yes. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Well, we're bringing back a good idea then, >!r. Oates. That was probably back when I was still in diapers. MR. OATES: You probably were; probably still in Columbus. MR. MULHERE: I have a few extra agendas up here on the table, three or four of them, if anybody from the public would like to look at them. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: There's a few extra agendas up here. Please help yourself and share them around the room. We've got a pretty good sized crowd today. With that, it brings us to our first advertised public hearing. BD-97-27, Mr. Reischl is the presenter. I'd ask all those present today that may want to speak on this petition, to please stand and raise your right hand, and I'll ask the court reporter to swear you in. Page 3 I IIII IIII I IIIII1! IIIIIIII III IIII II I I IIIII .................. I I II 16Gl January 15, 1998 (All speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Reischl. MR. REISCHL: Morning, commissioners. Fred Reischt0 Planning Services. This is a request for reconfiguration of a dock in the Bayfront Gardens subdivision. The reconfiguration still leaves 50 percent of the waterway unobstructed. They are going from a 19-foot protrusion into the waterway out to a 25-foot protrusion in order allow easier access and to have the boat rest in deeper water. We have received no phone calls or letters for or against the petition, and staff recommends approval. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any questions of staff? Does petitioner have anything to add MR. SCOFIELD: Not unless you have any questions. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any questions of the petitioner? Anyone from the public that wants to speak on this petition? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. Motion? ~4R. OAT£S: ~4r. Chairman, I move we approve BD-97-27. MR. PRiDDY: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion of approval by Mr. Oates, seconded by Priddy. Discussion? All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. Petition Number PDI-97-8, Mr. Bellows presenting. MR. BRUET: Excuse me, Mr. Chairman. CHAIP_MAN DAVIS: Yes. -MR. BRUET: I need to recuse myself in that my employer has an interest in this property. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. With that, I'll ask anyone here today that's going to speak on this petition to please stand, raise your right hand so the court reporter may swear you in. (All witnesses were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bellows. MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows, Planning Services staff. Petitioner seeks approval of and a substantial change to ~he Pavilion Shopping Center PUD Master Plan for the purposes of adding an outparcel and revising the parking and access points onto U.S. 41. The development of this outparcel will necessitate a change in the !ocational alignment on the entrance off of U.S. 41. It will shift the existing entrance slightly to the north, and as a result, some open space and green areas will be slightly impacted. As you can see on the plan, the developer has proposed to mitigate these by cutting away pavement and adding additional green and open space areas. The changes to the median will require FDOT approval. There are nine criteria by which substantial a/nendments are to be reviewed, and some of the major points are as follows: There is no increase in the boundaries of the existing PUD. The Page 4 16G1 January 150 1998 proposed increase does not affect the density; doesn't affect the amount of approved commercial uses within the PUD document itself. There is no substantial increase in the impact of the development on roadways, traffic circulation, or on the open space requirements of the PUD doc'mments. The change will not affect storm water retention. The trips generated -- this project will not have a significant impact on U.S. 41 or on any county road system. Staff has received a couple of phone calls with concerns about the access point on 41, but no strong opposition to the proposed outparcel, itself. The Collier County Planning Commission staff's recommendation is that the Planning Commission approve Petition PDI-97-8 subject to tke stipulations in the resolution. If you have any questions, I'll be happy to ans%ler them. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Bellows. Questions of staff? Petitioner? MR. TYSON: Mr. Bellows made the presentation. If there is anything else that might be specific. I'm Bruce Tyson, by the way, for the record, with Wilson, Miller, Barton, Peek. If there are any other questions that you might have. It's an insubstantial change, relatively straight fo~ard, as he explained. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any questions of Mr. Tyson? Thank you. Yes, sir. Would you like to speak? MIR. OATES: I don't think he was sworn. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Sir, were you sworn in? MR. RICHARDSON: No. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. -MR. RICHARDSON: But I'll be happy to be sworn to anything you wish. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. (The speaker was sworn.) MR. RICHARDSON: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: If you could state your name for the record. MR. RICHARDSON: Yes. I'm Dwight Richardson, I live in Naples Park on 101st Avenue North, and we're just not clear that this is an insubstantial change, as stated by the planner. It seems to me what we have is a mature PUD, which we've lived with for a number of years, and now, coming along, it looks like we're adding a new commercial space to this area. And I'm not sure that that's supported by the petitioner. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bellows, if you could respond to that? MR. BELLOWS: Yes. The staff report indicates the PUD document doesn't limit the size of commercial floor area. They could add additional square footage to the existing structures without coming in for this petition. But the purpose of creating an outparcel is to allow them to sell that off at a later date. There is no max -- which requires a change in Master Plan, which is why we're here today. biR. RICHARDSON: So this is a question of commercial, if you Page 5 January 15, 1998 will, needing more money out of this site. Is that what I'm understanding, it's a commercial development issue? MR. BELLOWS: It's not a review criteria for staff. But like i said, there is no limit in the PUD document. They could build a structure in this location without coming in here today. MR. RICHARDSON: This changes the footprint of the area, though, doesn't it? MR. BELLOWS: That's the reason. MR. RICHARDSON: And therefore, it's not an insubstantial change. MR. MULHERE: We don't agree with that. MR. RICHARDSON: Okay. Well, let me say for the record then, that we're not clear what impact this is going to have on our North Naples community. We have an existing commercial area that'£ a ve~t congested intersection, and if they are planning an outparce], now at this late date for some additional commercial use, I think that needs to be understood before it's approved. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Richardson. Mr. Kant? MR. KANT: Edward Kant, Transportation Services. In response to the issue that was raised by the last speaker, it is our understanding, and as a portion of our review, that no new or changed access will be a part of this petition. The parcel will still receive its access internally from the shopping center. So the question or the issue was just raised about additional traffic. There would be no external change that we could see. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Kant. Are there additional speakers on this topic today? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. Mr. Bellows, you've said it before, but as you've been accepted as Mn e.~pert witness by this board many times before. MR. BELLOWS: Yes. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And in your expert opinion, this, in fact, by our Land Development Code, is an insubstantial change? MR. BELLOWS: Yes. As we go through all the review criteria that are listed in the staff report, clearly the PUD document allows for the square footage. It's not an increase that would make a change to the PUD document itself. It's basically dealing with creating a footprint and property lying for the outparcel, which is a Master Plan change, which fits the criteria for an insubstantial change to the PUD. MS. STUDENT: Mr. Chairman, if I could just maybe shed some light on that. We have, I believe it's nine criteria. These are planning type criteria, and these are what we have to review the petition by. But just kind of to clarify, it may, to a layman, you know, seem like any change is substantial. But we go by what's in our Land Development Code, and based upon planning and transportation and so forth, principles. So I just wanted to clarify that for the record. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. I think it's important that -- MR. BELLOWS: The main impact I would say on the neighborhood would be a trip generation. There will be additional site generated Page 6 January 15, 1998 trips in the additional square footage, but it doesn't affect the level of service on any county or state road. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. PRIDDY: Mr. Chairman, I move we approve PDI-97-8. MR. OATES: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion of approval by Mr. Priddy, seconded by Mr. Oates. Discussion on the motion? All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. Petition PUD 97-12, presented by Mr. Milk. Once again, all those here today that may want to speak on this petition, please s%and, raise your right hand. So that you may be sworn by the court reporter. (All speakers were sworn.) MR. YORK: Mr. Chairman, I need to disclose that I had a conversation with Mr. Clesen regarding this petition, a very short conversation. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. York. Mr. Milk? MR. MILK: Good morning, commissioners. For the record, my name is Brian Milk, and I am presenting Petition PUD-97-12. Mr. Hoover of Hoover Planning ShoPDe, is representing Frank Clesen and Sons, Inc., requesting a rezone of the subject property from"E" Estates to Planned Unit Development for the purposes of constructing a commercial and professional office center at that particular site. The subject site is 4.33 acres in size, and is located at the northwest quadrant of the 1-75 Pine Ridge Road interchange activity center. This activity center was designated as a commercial node back in 1983, as a particular square. In 1989, that configuration changed to the current configuration, specifically identified as the interchange activity center of which this parcel is a Dart of. The subject property shows three tracts for development, tracts A, B and C. The purpose of that series of tract development is to provide a transition from Livingston Road residents to the north, and more intensive commercial properties in use to the south abutting Pina Ridge Road. In area A, it's approximately .55 acres in size. It provides for only open space and stormwater management. In area B, which is 1.88 acres in size, it allows for hotels, motels, sit down restaurants only, banks, professional offices, business offices and limited retail. In area C, which is abutting the Pine Ridge Road right-of-way, it provides for the fast food restaurants, auto supply stores and the remainder of uses in area B. The maximum height of the project is limited to three stories, or a maximum of 35 feet. Access is provided by what we call a bisecting easement, north and south and east and west. These bisecting Page 7 , ,,, ,,, t I gl lie I I I IIIIIIII I II III II III III I I I I II II I 15Gl ' January 15, 1998 easements are 60 feet in width and are part of the Golden Gate Estates plat. The petitioner proposes to provide a 40-foot right-of-way from these bisecting easements once they are vacated, and a cross section of the road detail will provide identical details to that of our commercial and industrial road cross-sections per the Land Development Code. There's a 20-foot buffer provided along the front; there's a 20-foot buffer provided along Livingston Woods Road. That buffer entails a eight-foot high architecturally designed masonry wall, of which a landscape hedge will be placed on the north side, along with canopy trees placed every 15 feet. So you'll have approximataly 15 feet of opaqueness for the residents looking south from Livingston Woods Road. The intent of this is to, again, provide a transition to those residents to the north of Livingston Woods Road. Most of those properties at this point in that area are undeveloped. They are approximately 2.25 acres in size. There are scattered residents, though, however, that live behind the property and throughout that corridor. Staff has not received any letters of opposition to this particular hearing. I will say that it is fairly identical to Angeleri PUD and the Naples Gateway PUD, with the exception that this PUD does not propose convenience stores or gasoline service stations. If I can answer any questions, I'd be happy to do so. CHAIKMAN DAVIS: Questions? MR. BRUET: Mr. Chairman, I got one.. Brian, without an access -- shared access agreement in place to date, how does that affect your revi%w process. MR. MILK: Well, I will say that the abutting property, Tract 77, which is immediately to the west, are in for review currently and that's a PUD, PUD-97-!7. It's called Pine Ridge Corners PUD. That particular client is allowing for access through the projects. That proper~y has to provide a right decel lane into the property which will eventually provide access north and then eventually back east zo the subject property. We are currently working on that as a collective package, along with maintaining that frontage road in between the projects, so ~hey can travel east-west also. So I hope that answers your question. MR. BRUET: By law, are they bound to provide someone legal access, because you can't get it from Pine Ridge Road. MR. KANT: Edward Kant, Transportation. I'm not qualified to answer the legal question -- MR. BRUET: I understand. MR. KANT: -- but I can tell you that from transportation and traffic point of view, when we do these reviews where we have seen these types of properties before -- typically at the interchanges -- we have requested that that type of access be incorporated into the adjacent properties, if you remember back -- I'm going to say at least Page 8 ......... ~ I I III I II IIII II IIII II - I 16G1 , January 15, 1998 three years, possibly longer -- when the adjacent property to the west came in, at one time known as Tropicana Plaza, at one time .known as something else -- it's gone through several incarnations -- one of the basic requirements always was that access be granted to the adjacent properties. Aside from any other problems that that particular site may have had, that was never at issue, because in order to get reasonable access to the entire property to the west, they would have had to provide a driveway or a road or something almost to their eastern property line. So that's not, at least up to this point, we have not found that to be an issue. So I would concur with Mr. Milk that during the review process when staff sees these types of situations, while I'm not aware of any law that says thous shalt or thous must, we, as a planning and engineering tool, we try to request cooperation. And typically, we're pretty successful in getting ~R. BRUET: I would imagine you would be. Does that provide access -- that north-south connector provide access back ~o tke west? MR. KANT: As I understand it, it will, because the bulk of the -- if I may. MR. MILK: East and west. MR. KANT: The bulk of this entrance road is on the adjacent property because of the lack of frontage, if you remember that Tropicana Plaza that I mentioned. So this actually comes up and then it bends and shares the property line. So these people have to do this to get access to their property, and so forth. MR. BRUET: Okay. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Milk, I think I heard you say that we -- as far as the concern of the people that live in Livingston Woods may have -- :hose same controls that we've seen, or similar controls that we've seen in the Angeleri PUD and others, are in place here. MR. MILK: Right. Specifically with the setback of the building. Angeleri was 90 feet; this proposes 82.5 feet. Three stories and three stories. Very similar architectural designs, all those parameters, signage, landscaping. And importantly, the wall, b%,ffer treatment along Livingston Woods Road is identical to Gateway and Angeleri. So tha: will be a uniform buffer-fence opaqueness on that corner. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: So we're going to see some consistence, at least a visual perception of consistency of development from an architectural standpoint and whatnot? MR. MILK: Yes, sir. The cross-sections for the buffer and the fencing are identical on each PUD. That's correct. CHAIKMAN DAVIS: Any additional questions of staff? Petitioner? MR. HOOVER: Good morning, commissioners. For the record, Bill Hoover of Hoover Planning, representing Frank Clesen and Sons. I think it's pretty much cut and dried. On the access issue, Gary Byron owns the property to the west. He's on vacation right now but he told me in December he knows Mr. Clesen pretty well. We're Page 9 1.6G1 January 15, 1998 going to sit down here in the next few weeks and Mr. John Spear, Clesen's attorney. We provided an access to the property to the east in the form of an easement that would run in perpetuity, and I've talked to -- the man's name is Frank Kralick (phonetic) up in Chicago. He's afraid that it's going to raise his taxes, so he's not willing to sign and get that easement. But it's going to be sitting there. So we'll continue offering that. And it does show on the PUD Master Plan that we will provide that to the east. And Mr. Beyrent, Mr. Spear has made up an easement agreement. However, based on his discussions with Dudley Goodlette and Burr Saunders, there is legal access that the property has right now, so we can actually go in and build this access road as soon as we can get an SDP approved and FDOT and county right-of-way permit. MR. BRUET: That would just be 100 percent on your property, is what you're saying? MR. HOOVER: No. It would be the access going to the west and then to the south. That is legal access, and there is a legal recording in the county records. I don't know the O.R. Book and page right now, but that is a legal access, 60-foot wide. And we are permitted by ~aw to go ahead and use that. MR. MILK: I think a couple things would have tc happen. During the SDP for this subject PUD, we'd have to see that access in place, the necessary lane improvements in place, and east-west north-south roadways before Mr. Hoover could develop the property. MR. BRUET: It would be a complete package, so to speak, at that point? MR. MILK: It would be a complete package. 'MR. BRUET: He's paid his fee now, so you've reviewed it, and subject to access, he can -- MR. MILK: Subject to site development plan review, platting issues, transportation issues. Yes, sir. MR. BRUET: I understand. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any other questions of the petitioner? Thank you. Anyone else here today that would like to speak on this petition? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. MR. YORK: Mr. Chairman, I'll move we approve PUD-97-12. MR. BUDD: Second. MR. OATES: Shouldn't that be a recommendation for approval? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I'm sure that's what Mr. York meant. A recommendation of approval motion made by Mr. York, seconded by Mr. Budd. Discussion? All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That carries unanimously. MR. OATES: Mr. Chairman, before we proceed, I would like to announce that back in the Dark Ages, in the middle '50s, I worked for Page 10 January 15, 1998 Ford Motor Company in Dearborn. I was smart enough to move to Florida 50 years ago, so I haven't had any relationship with Ford since that time. MR. B~UET: Mr. Chairman, I once again recuse myself in that my employer has an interest in this property. MR. PRIDDY: I drive a Ford. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Driving a Ford does not -- MR. YORK: You're all right. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That brings us to PUD-83-17 (1), being presented by Mr. Arnold. I'd ask all those present here today that may want to speak on this petition, to please stand, raise your right hand, so you may be sworn by the court reporter. (All speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Mr. Arnold? MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. For the record, Wayne Arnold, Planning Services Director. This petition is, of course, an amendment to the Ford Motor Company test track PUD facility, the first recorded amendment to this PUD. I think most of us are familiar with the location, but it's approximately 12 miles east of State Road 951, just north of Alligator Alley. It consists of just about 530 acres. Currently, it's developed with test track facilities for the Ford Motor Company. The essence of the PUD amendment today goes back to a couple years' worth of history with Collier County, where the county has pledged to try to attempt to retain Ford Motor Company in Collier County by helping to keep Ford Motor Company current with its operational needs. -And with respect to that, Ford Motor Company had approached Collier County with a need to make some adjustments to their Pb~ because of some new vehicle testing requirements that the federal government has mandated on car companies. The substance of the amendment today is essentially to change the one restriction that says you can only test passenger vehicles and light duty trucks on the project. The attempt today is to allow all types of motor vehicle testing, with the restriction that any high performance vehicle testing can only be completed during daylight hours. The second amendment that is of substance today is that of clarifying a communications tower is a permissible land use on the site. The current language says that you can have antennas. I believe that's an antiquated term for what we now know as a communication tower, and that's how we reference them in our current code. This again is a 1983 petition and 15 years have given us some new terminology. One other amendment that we're contemplating here is to remove some of the original transportation stipulations that dealt with the pavement and maintenance of Desoto Boulevard and the access road, 34th Avenue, to this project. It has been contended over the years that some of these Page 11 16GI January 15, 1998 improvements have not been completed, but the Board of County Commissioners approximately 10 years ago now, dealt with this matter and determined that there, in fact, was a swap that had been completed in terms of maintenance responsibilities between county and Ford Motor Company and'or the Colliers, however that arrangement was made. And we believe that those improvements have been completed and the necessity for that language in the PUD is no longer necessary. I would like to mention one change from what you've seen in your packet related to the communications tower. I have some additional language here that I'd like to present to you, and it's come up fairly recently. If I could ask, maybe Bob, if you could hand that out to the Planning Commissioners? What you'll see before you, we've been approached very recently by the Colliers, as well as the Sheriff's Department for Collier County, and the Emergency Services Department for the county, with a need for a very specialized type of communication tower. The language :hat you have in your packet today references a tower not exceeding 185 feet in height. The change we would like to make at the podium today would be to reference the need for a tower to a maximum height of 500 feet. It would be a guide wire tower which would allow for shared use for other communications companies, but, in fact, would also be a secondary backup system for the 900 megahertz system currently used by the Sheriff's Department and the county's EMS. And the necessity there -- I don't understand all the technological need for the height -- but in fact, the backup system relies on not a point to point type of communication, therefore the height is necessary. The Colliers have faxed me some information that references a proposed location which is north of the access road, essentially 400 feet internal to the project. And I don't believe, given the vegetative buffer that is present on the site and the configuration of lots that abut the Ford Motor Company property, that ~hat's going to be visible from any property adjacent to the site. But that is the substance of the height, I understand. I don't have anything in writing from the Federal Aviation or Mosquito Control or either airport. But I understand that verbal communication has been made with all agencies. There is no issue related to height and this being in any type of flight corridor. But it would certainly come within the requirement to have FAA approval for the tower. That's the essence of the amendments. We don't believe that there are additional environmental impacts that result from changing the type of vehicle testing here. We also have a commitment to adhere to the county's noise ordinance at all times. Which, in this area, it's technically designated industrial, which would qualify for a higher decibel level reading throughout the day of approximately 75 decibels. However, because of the proximity to the estates property, I'm going to tell you that I believe that that qualifies for the Page 12 II IIIIIIII I IIII II II III - I III I I I IIII I iml II I ii ~ January 15, 1998 relationship of adjacency to residential property, therefore the decibel reading maximum during the day is 65. It drops to, I believe, 60 in the evening. That's really the substance of our report. I do have two letters of objection that I received. I received one as the meeting was proceeding. I have copies of that before the Planning Commissioners and County Attorney. This is from a gentleman named Thomas Mazza, who apparently lives currently on Marco Island, and has indicated he desires to build a home in this vicinity; he says along 38th Avenue near Desoto. I couldn't find his name on our tax records, so it could be that he's a more current property owner or not within the 300-foot notification range that we held. I don't know which that is. And Bob, if you might hand out that letter. I don't have copies of the other letter of objection, but it's from a gentleman named Ishmael Medina from Weston, Florida. I did check. His property is not adjacent to the Ford test track property. It is north, and let me point out generally where it is. Mr. Medina's property is located, I believe, right here on Tract 114, so it's north of the boundary of the project, approximately 500 feet from the project boundary. MS. STUDENT: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes. MS. STUDENT: In that vein, before the public, if any, come to the podium, would the commission disclose any ex parte communications they may have had? CHAIR/W3uN DAVIS: Okay. Any questions of Mr. Arnold? In this case, the county itself is actually the agent for the petitioner; right? MR. ARNOLD: That is correct. The Board of County Commissioners approved that about two weeks ago at the county commission meeting; passed a resolution to allow staff to act as agent for the Colliers and Ford Motor Company. As part of our commitment, it made the Ford Motor Company a couple years ago. CHAIR/W_AN DAVIS: I just wanted to make sure we understood that you are serving a dual role today. MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: We now offer the podium to anyone here that would like to speak on this petition today. Please come forward, state your name for the record, and remind us if you've been sworn or not, if you would, please. MS. WINELAND: Yes, I have been. My name is Linda Wineland (phonetic). I live on 38th Avenue, S.E., approximately 900 feet west of Desoto Boulevard within hearing range of the Ford Evaluation Center. I have been for the past 18 years a professor of biology and ecology at the Collier County campus of Edison Community College. In addition, I worked for approximately three years as a consultant to the Collier County Natural Resources Management Department, during which time I assisted in the investigation and analysis of all the Page 13 I6G1 J~nuary 15, 1998 major biotopes in the undeveloped Collier County lands. In the course of my work, I drove and/or walked through much of the county, and what I learned led me to purchase property in my neighborhood. I have also, since 1991, served as a member of the Board of Direczors of the Naflorian (phonetic) Dune Wildlife Sanctuary. Let me state at the outset I am not an enemy of the Ford evaluation facility. I neither wish nor intend by my actions to drive Ford from Collier County, as has been erroneously stated about people in my neighborhood by poorly informed members of the local media. I am, however, pro neighborhood. For the issues at hand, and the area in which I live. Members of my residential neighborhood along Desoto Boulevard have been good and caring stewards of our land, which contains some of the finest native communities in southwestern Florida. We have purchased property and moved there for the peace, tranquility and beauty of the natural environment. The area is noted for its natural history amenities and for its natural reservations, including the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge and the greater than 200-acre Naflorian Dune Wildlife Sanctuary. In addition, surrounding the Ford Evaluation Center are environmentally sensitive wetlands clearly depicted on the county's land use map, including the Stumpy Strand and Lucky Lakes Strand. Testing conditions currently at Ford are periodically bothersome, but not yet intolerable. Our concerns about the current petition are these. Number one, noise pollution from accelerated vehicular testing. Among the many unknowns are the types of vehicles, the noise levels, the duration and timing of the tests and many more. Second, reduction in the quality of life for current and future residents in the area of Golden Gate Estates along Desoto Boulevard. Third, a decline in the current and future property values in an area potentially afflicted with extreme levels of noise pollution. Fourth, the wildlife. The threatened Florida black bear, the endangered Florida panther, and numerous permanent and migratory birds, among other species, utilize heavily the area in question. Previously released information by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission has documented that at least half a dozen black bears and panthers have been tracked inside -- inside -- the existing fence of the Ford facility. Number five, increased traffic along Desoto Boulevard resulting from increased testing will adversely affect residents, school children, wildlife and family activities, such as jogging, bicycling and walking. Six, the educational value of the area as a biological resource and as a natural reservation will decline. School children, teachers and college students from throughout Collier County have visited and studied regularly in this rural area and have used it as an ecological classroom. The richness and diversity of the native species of flora and fauna, are indeed priceless educational treasures. We have no pertinent data on the effects of high performance Page 14 January 15, 1998 vehicular noise on, for example, the reproductive behavior of the native animal species. The decline or loss of such species from our county would indeed be tragic. Seven, we just heard a few minutes ago about the tower increase to 500 feet, and certainly, it will be visible. There are no 500-foot trees in the county that I know of, except for some exotic species. So to say that the tower would be invisible and that its guy wires would have no effect, is ridiculous. Finally, this is a case in which it appears that an out of state multibillion dollar corporation may be granted unduly favorable treatment to the detriment of our rural middle income residential neighborhood. I hope that you, the members of the Planning Commission, will have the foresight, the wisdom and especially the courage to do the right thing and recommend against the emendation of Ordinance 84-8. I will be happy to meet with any of you at our mutual convenience to further discuss this matter. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Next speaker? MR. GUNDECK: Morning. My name's Scott Gundeck. I'm a general contractor. I live very close to Ford Motor Company. And the letter you received from Mr. Mazza, he bought his property from me, and we're currently drawing up a set of plans to build him a house. If we go ahead with the changes to the PUD, I stand to lose a customer to build a house for, which is the way I make my living. I'd also like to state that I don't believe that the Ford Evaluation Center has complied with the current PUDs and that they have been violating them ever since they have been there. Nobody has monitored them or enforced the current PUDs on them. If they're allowed to go ahead and change the PUD the way they want to, it's just more proof to me, this is my opinion, that if you have enough money you can do any darn thing you want to in Collier County. That's all I have to say. My wife has a prepared statement and also some photographs of our proximity to the Ford Motor Company test track. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you Mr. Gundeck. MS. GUNDECK: Hi, my name is Gina Gundeck. I have a photo here -- I only have one -- I would like to pass it around to show the committee, if possible. MR. PRIDDY: We have to keep it if you give it to us. MS. GUNDECK: I don't care. I have a negative, I just only have one copy. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: The photo -- any photos you give to us will go along with the package to the Board of County Commissioners. MS. GUNDECK: That's fine. I don't have a problem with that. In addition to that, I have additional letters from other members of our community that I would like to pass on to you. Some have copies for everyone. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: We can pass those out. Thank you. MS. GUNDECK: As my husband stated, we live at 4939-26th Avenue, Page 15 I II IIIIIII IIIIIII I II III IIIIII I I II IIIII .... Il II I I January 15, 1998 S.E., Naples, Florida. Our home is located on the eastern boundary of Golden Gate Estates and as you'll see from the photo, directly west of the north end of north end of the Ford Evaluation Center 2.1 mile straightaway and sound path. We own approximately 25 contiguous acres on the eastern Estates border, several of which are adjacent to Collier Enterprises property. I ask you allow me time to finish my statement and I will be glad to address your questions at that time. The first issue concerns Mr. Bruet, and I do commend him for recusing himself, being as he was the author of the letter to the county for Collier Enterprises. Second, I come to advise you of our concerns about the pending change to the PUD that Ford operates under, but first, I state that I'm not against the Ford Evaluation Center, and made a decision zo build our home knowing the facility was there. The second issue I'd like to address is noise. As I just stated, we were aware of the facility and the noise that could be heard az the time from FEC was accepzable to us. Since that time, the noise levels have increased, but we have not complained much and have notified the FEC site supervisor, Matt Seer, when noises were very disturbing or annoying, especially between the hours of 10 p.m. and 5 a.m. To date, we have worked things out. For your information, we can hear just about every vehicle as it reaches the turnaround. After tour and demonstration of the new sound pad testing, we can tell when they are doing these tests. Vehicle noise and motor induction noise carries a long way in our quiet rural neighborhood. With that being said I find it curious and disturbing that the county has arbitrarily declared that the impact zone is only 300 feet. What data-allowed them to choose this figure? The request for emendation affects our entire neighborhood. On one occasion a few years ago, when Ford was illegally testing Indy cars out there, we were at the north entrance of Janes Scenic Drive in the south block and could hear that car easily. I hope you all are familiar with where that is. That is quite a long way south of the Ford Evaluation Center. Another time they were testing this type of car, a friend in Woodland Estates, which is located approximately riva miles west in the ag area east of Everglades Boulevard accessed off of 28th Avenue, S.E., called me and said she could hear it like it was coming down the grade, as she refers to Woodland Grade. People who live on Golden Gate Boulevard between Everglades and Desoto could also hear it. So you see, the impact area is not as the county has stated and is considering. The remaining issues reference documents, as I state. The letter from Collier Enterprises to Vincent Cautero indicates that Ford wishes to be allowed to do extensive road noise testing of all types of vehicles, including large trucks and racing vehicles. It also indicates that there will be sound reducing control devices to be installed to minimize noise, but not to eliminate it. If you have ever heard an Indy car, a Winston Cup or Busch Series racing car, you Page i6 16Gl January 15, 1998 must know these vehicles are extremely loud. In addition, if they are to operate'at their maximum capacity, they simply cannot be muffled. There is no way the sound from these vehicles and/or heavy trucks will be minimized enough to not spill over into our residential subdivisions. The Collier letter gives no specific details about any methods of sound reducing control devices, nor is there any mention in the memorandum from Community Development to you about any such methods. · More importantly, there are no data provided to indicate that FEC will comply with the noise ordinance, 54-81, or provisions in Article II, Section 22-21 of the Collier County Code. Exhibit A of the same letter simply indicates that testing units shall be motor vehicles. This gives no specific description of a motor vehicle. An airplane engine has a motor, and it is also a vehicle used for transportation. The description given is much too ,;ague. I would like to now direct your attention to the memorandum to you from the Community Development and Environmental Services Division dated December 17th. Paragraph one states that the petitioner seeks to test all motor vehicles and to specifically reference a communication tower as a newly permitted use within the PUD. First, I do not see that the Collier Enterprises requested a communication tower in their letter; and second, no description of what type of tower, how many, and what affect, if any, it or they may have on our adjacent residential community as mentioned. And I do have to disagree with Mr. Arnold that I can certainly see a 500-foot tower. There is a tower located on Tower Road in that same Woodland Estates subdivision I referenced earlier, and I can certainly see that from my house. And it will cause a problem with airp%ane traffic. There are a lot of airplanes that fly next to the Alley, or 1-75. Page 2 of said memorandum has a reference map that, in its present state, is very deceiving to the public since it does not even show Desoto Boulevard on it. Perhaps this was an oversight, but nonetheless, should be corrected. This map leads the public or those unfamiliar with the area to believe that nothing is located around this facility, which is not true. Page 3, paragraph 2, indicates testing will occur in accordance with Collier County Noise Ordinance. The location of this facility is at least 45 minutes from downtown Naples. There is only one person on call from the Code Enforcement department to test for sound violations. Therefore, this statement is meaningless. It sounds good and looks good to the public, but to the residents of this neighborhood we know that if they decide to run an Indy car, for example, and we feel it violates the noise ordinance, our call to the Code Enforcement department for them to come, set their machines up and witness the noise is fruitless, since by the time the technician arrives, the noise will be gone. We experienced the same problem with any violation FEC does now. The surrounding land use and zoning section indicates that to the north is inactive agriculturally zoned land. I would like to point Page 17 January 15, 1998 out that although the land immediately north is agriculturally zoned land currently leased to a hunting club, there are miles and miles of active farmland north of that leased area. It indicates that to the east it is undisturbed land zoned agricultural. Again, I would like to point out that some the land immediately east and adjacent to their facility, is the Florida Panther Wildlife Refuge. The two statements they have made are therefore incorrect and are, at best, misleading to the general public. The section also indicates that to the west is Golden Gate Estates subdivision. "Properties are generally undeveloped, although there are a few tracts in which single family homes have been developed," it says. I would like to inform you that there may be only a few residents here now, but all property from 24th Avenue, S.E., to 1-75, is privately owned and has been so for approximately 30 years and the county has gladly taken those owners' tax dollars every year. Approximately 400 of those same property owners have thought enough of their property and/or investment to give our Neighborhood Watch group authorization to protect their land from those wishing to break the law. Obviously, they would like to protect their investment in hopes for a nice place to live or to retain their property values for resale purposes. Please remember that the current landfill site had only a few single family homes around it when the location was chosen. As the wife of a general contractor, I'm quite versed on property values and the effect noise impacts in general surroundings have on them. Page 4 indicates that the stipulation related to road paving along Desoto Boulevard and 34th Avenue, S.E., have previously been comp'leted by the project developer I have read every document in the county records that I could find on this project from 1983 until now, and have yet to see anything other than a requirement of Ford to pave from 34th to the Alley. I can assure you this has not been paved or resurfaced since Ford came to the neighborhood. As far as I can tell they are not in compliance with their PUD. Mrs. Student, on April 1, 1996, in a county commission meeting stated that any textural changes to a PUD has to go through the amendment process and the removal of certain uses would have to go through ~hat process. Anything that was done in a trade-off, in my opinion, was done illegally because nothing is stated of record and there was no county hearing, no public hearing to change that. In my research of old documents on file in the county, I saw concerns expressed back in °83 from property owners out here about the types of vehicles to be tested and the type of fuel to be used and/or stored on-site for those vehicles. I have the same concerns now as they did about extremely volatile fuels on this site, that is at best 20 minutes from the nearest fire station. I have seen the FEC fire truck and it is not equipped to handle a fire or explosion of racing fuels. Remembering that in 1984, the County Commission agreed with the Page 18 January 15, 1998 property owners and allowed testing of passenger cars and light duty trucks only. I'm a bit confused as to the purpose of the Ford Evaluation Center. The confusion comes after reviewing those documents. These documents state that representatives from Collier Enterprises f.ndicated that the facility would be used as an evaluation center, not a testing facility, and would operate only during daylight hours and test only off the assembly line passenger cars and light trucks, not prototype vehicles. Even though these representations failed to be specified in the PUD itself, they were made, and in my opinion, Ford has been violating the code of honor they represented through Collier Enterprises for many years now. I feel certain that there would not be as much concern with the FEC if these representations were adhered to and it was indeed on evaluation center, not a Ford test center. My next concern deals with the proposed ordinance 98-whatever. Page 1, 4.3, permitted uses and structures, item l(g) and (h). The word "compatible" is being replaced with the word "comparable." This causes great concern, since a compatible use is not necessarily a comparable use either in or out of the context of any of the other six delineated foregoing uses. Some uses may be comparable and found wanting in compatibility, but would still be allowed because it would be argued that they were, in fact, comparable. Since the precise wording in the PUD document is what determines its legal sufficiency and enforceability, definitions of these words become very important to the final legal content of the PUD. I see no reason to change the original wording and recommend it be left in its present state. · ' The county Transportation Services Department staff have not considered the amount of additional traffic that would be experienced on Desoto Boulevard by the reason of testing of additional types of motor vehicles. The test vehicle transport trucks, both open and enclosed, are quite enormous tractor-trailers, and are very heavy. I would like to remind them of the problem we had with south Desoto Boulevard when the flooding came a couple of years ago. At that time, the north end of Desoto Boulevard was not in the condition that the south end was, and most of the vehicle traffic to and from FEC comes from Golden Gate Boulevard to Desoto and south. The county refers to the traffic from FEC as "normal traffic," but "normal" is not defined. The impact from more of the same would be very great. I would like to close by saying once again that I am not against Ford's Evaluation Center. However, I am very protective about the neighborhood in which I live. I feel that this emendation if implemented, will greatly affect the fair market values of our properties and the ability to sell our homes or land in this area. It will make our property less desirable, since no one wants to live next to an Indy car test area and will ruin the tranquility of our neighborhood as it exists today. I urge you to consider the needs of property owners and residents Page 19 January 15, 1998 of the neighborhood over the desires of a large corporation, and recommend no emendation to the PUD. Please don't throw us and our quiet residential neighborhood to the corporate wolves. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Mrs. Gundeck. Next speaker? MR. PRIgDY: Mr. Davis, I have a question for staff. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: While the next speaker's coming up, So ahead, Mr. Priddy. MR. PRIDDY: Mr. Arnold, can they in fact test Indy cars here, racing cars. MR. ARNOLD: Should the PUD amendment go forward, yes, they would. Right now, the language says passenger vehicles and light duty trucks only. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: At what decibel level? Is there a decibel level limitation in the PUD currently MR. ARNOLD: No, there is not. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: But in your presentation, you talked about 60 decibels at night and 65 in the daytime? MR. ARNOLD: That is the current Land Development Code requirement, under our Land Development Code. It's a separate ordinance under our noise ordinance in the county. And I think in reference to Mrs. Gundeck's point, this has been a contentious issue since 1983, at what noise level they are going to be out there. But, in fact, that's the same as it is anywhere in the county, whether it would be Immokaiee or near Everglades City. The distance that you are from where the county staff is headquartered, that unfortunately, is just the situation in so many other locations relative to enforcement. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. ' Next speaker? DR. GORE: Good morning, gentlemen. For the record~ my name is Dr. Robert H. Gore, and you undoubtedly have read about me. I would like to start very quickly by pointing out that Mr. Arnold is wrong in locating Mr. Medina's property, and if I may be excused from the microphone to point out where Mr. Medina's land is, that will clarify Mr. Medina's letter and the issues tkat he addresses. CHAIR/~AN DAVIS: Please go ahead. DR. GORE: Mr. Medina's land is located at Tract 114, which is at the easternmost end of 40th Avenue, S.E., and thus is directly on the fence line of the Ford Motor Company test track. MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. DR. GORE: This allows me to segue into notification issues that concern me. Notification of property owners in the immediate vicinity of the Ford Evaluation Center has been deficient and incomplete because the Naflorian Dune Wildlife Sanctuary, of which I am the director, was never notified in writing of this hearing. The Naflorian Dune Wildlife Sanctuary owns land immediately adjacent to the Ford Motor Company Vehicle Evaluation Center Planned Unit Development community, and within 300 feet of the FEC property. Page 20 January 15, 1998 This particular property is Golden Gate Estates Unit 91, Tract 116, tax identification number 41510640003, in the OR 2356 page 2627. The Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge was also not notified in writing of the forthcoming hearing before the Collier County Planning Commission. This was a personal communication and subsequent fax letter from Mr. Jim Krakowski (phonetic), who is the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge Manager, dated January 8, 1998. The Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge also owns land within 300 feet of the Ford Motor Company's test track that is to say -- and i'm only going to quote part of the description, because it's quite long and I'll get you copies if you need to see it -- "that part of Section 34, Township 49 south, Range 28 east, Ta~lahassee Meridian, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described a~ .... and then it goes into the usual surveyor's description. The particular property is located -- if you can look at the map tkere where you have, it looks like the lower blade or perhaps the upper blades of a cleaver or a hatchet -- extending from the east of that area, farther eastward into the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge. Therefore, such lack of notification prevents a timely and complete response by both myself, acting as Director of Naflorian Dune Wildlife Sanctuary and also the Florida Panther National WildlLfe Refuge. The county Planning Commission will therefcre lack much of the data needed for them to make an informed and detailed assessment of the issues az hand. Now, let's address issues of compliance. The last paragraph of the Deer property owner letter, which we did not receive but which we did 'obtain by going down to the code compliance division, the last paragraph of the Deer property owner letter from the Collier County Con, unity Development Environmental Service Division notes that: "The petition application, development plans and other pertinent information related to this petition is kept on file and may be reviewed at the Development Services Center." This file was made available and contained a doc%unent entitled, Application for Public Hearing for PUD Amendment/DO Amendment, and so forth, with other wording. However, this particular document was inccmpietely filled out. This is contrary to the affidavit section on page 3 of that document, which clearly states: "We", i.e., the affidavits, affidavitors (sic) -- "understand this application must be completed and accurate before a hearing can be advertised." Now, it is not clear whether the document provided to the general public was indeed incomplete, or was, in fact, superseded by a more complete document. Clearly, this issue needs to be addressed to ensure compliance by county staff with their own particular rules. Now I want to address issues of substance. To continue any consideration of the proposed emendation to Ordinance 84-8 will result in a violation of certain portions of the zoning section of the Collier County Land Development Code 2.7.2.4, 2.7.2.5 and 2.7.3.5.1, in that based on the above statements -- and I'll quote these very Page 21 16Gl January 15, 1998 quickly as we go down the land code document -- "the Planning Commission will be unable to meet the requirements of 2.7.2.4" -- and if it's okay with the court reporter, I'm simply going to read the letters and you can put the "points" in there -- because they would be unable to adequately study and/or consider the proposed changes in the ordinance, owing to the failure by county staff to ascertain and notify some property owners whose lands lie adjacent to and within their own designated 300-foot zone of influence. The failure of the county staff to provide such notification in a timely manner, thus prevents such property owners from presenting the necessarily detailed response and data supporting their position either for or against the amendment, and owing to such failure, the Planning Commission under 2.7.2.5, would, ipso facto, obtain an incomplete assessment as to -- and I'm quoting now the docume~t -- whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood -- and that's 2.7.2.5.6 -- whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses because of projected types of vehicular traffic or as otherwise affect Public Safety -- 2.7.2.5.7 -- whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area --2.7.2.5.10 -- whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent properties, that is to say, eastern Golden Gate Estates along the Desoto Boulevard corridor -- 2.7.2.5.11 -- whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner, as contrasted with the public welfare -- 2.7.2.5.12 -- whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood -- 2.7.2.5.14 -- and whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 2.7.2.5.15. Moreover, based on the above statements, the Planning Commission would itself be unable to meet requirements of 2.7.3.5.1 because such a proposed emendation, by definition, is deemed a substantial change and therefore whether -- and again, I'm quoting the document -- there is a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include but are not limited to increases in traffic generation or impacts on other public facilities. 2.7.3.5.15. The change will result in land use activities =hat generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Traffic Engineers. 2.7.3.5.16. The change will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use. 2.7.3.5.18. Any modification to the PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which would increase the intensity of the permitted land uses -- 2.7.3.5.19 -- thus could not be adequately considered at this time. The wording in the proposed emendation is too vague in regard to specific types, numbers, methods of testing for the quote, motor vehicles, close quote, of Exhibit A, or quote, high performance vehicles, close quote, in the proposed Ordinance 98--. Nor is there Page 22 January 15, 1998 any indication in the same proposal of how many, how often, for how long, and during what specific times these same vehicles would be tested. So that the Collier County Planning Commission not only clearly lacks the necessary data to make an informed decision as to the quote, motor vehicles, close quote, in the amendment being proposed, but that the very generality of the proposed wording will permit unspecified activities beyond those which the planning commission might be contemplating to allow. And that the Collier County Planning Commission also lacks the necessary data to assess the potential affects the proposed emendation of the ordinance may have on the surrounding rural residential neighborhood as well as the envirOnmentally sensitive land surrounding the PUD property, which are clearly delineated and depicted en the county's on land use documents and maps. Therefore, it is our conclusion, Naflorian Dune Wildlife Sanctua~t therefore respectfully requests that this public hearing and emendation process be tabled for 60 days in order to allow the necessary time for, first, county staff to complete the requisite application for public hearing documents and thereby conform to the statements therein, which stipulate that the application must be completed and accurate before a hearing can be advertised. Second, county staff to adequately perform the requisite and more detailed studies on potential impacts on traffic, quality of life and environmental impacts that may result from the ordinance change, and which are presently lacking. And third, to provide such collected data as are clearly mandated by their own documents, and thereby, fourth, to allow other interested part%es, including but not restricted to, Naflorian Dune Wildlife Sanctuary, to perform a similar analysis. And fifth, to allow the Collier County Planning Commission to adequately analyze not only the present documents relating to both the ordinance 84-8 and its proposed emendation, but to consider the pertinent information that should have been provided by county staff but is presently lacking, and in pertinent future information as well. So that sixth and finally, Collier County Planning Commission can concomitantly frame an informed, detailed, fair and appropriate response using all the data. The issues before you today, commissioners, are not whether Ford Motor Company, by giving tax deductible gifts to the Sheriff's Department, to the hospital, and to migrant labor services, is therefore being a good and quiet neighbor. The citizens who live along the Desoto Boulevard corridor, who go to work every day to try and earn a living, who try to raise their children correctly, who live their simple, everyday lives, are also good and quiet neighbors. The only gift they can give is their taxes that they pay every year. The issue instead is whether a megabillion dollar corporation can come into a community and almost hold it financially hostage by giving away its product and then threatening to take all of its toys and Page 23 I I IIIIIII I I I III I II I III I I I IIII III I I January 15, 1998 freebies and leave if it doesn't get what it wants. The issue is whether a megabillion dollar corporation can violate with impunity and at will, the stipulations of its own PUD and ordinance and then ask the county to bless these same violations by removing the owner's stipulation that forbids them in the first place. The issue is whether a compliant county staff, who only reluctantly investigated these same ongoing violations, and who currently have failed to adequately investigate the pros and cons of the proposed new ordinance, can be allowed to make uninformed decisions on this ordinance and pass them off to you members of the planning commission as being the last and best word. The issue is whether a county director -- I should say ex-county director -- can override and amend at will a PUD without a public hearing, and reference has already been made to Mrs. Student's statement at a previous county commission meeting. The issue you is whether the peace and tranquility of a small rural neighborhood must be sacrificed for the nebulous greater good advocated by a few individuals, none of whom live in our neighborhood, none of whom have troubled themselves to find out exactly what the facts are; but are all too willing to stand before you or the County Commission and roundly castigate in the public record anyone who dares to say that there is another side to this coin. We sincerely hope that the far-reaching decisions to be made by this board and which will so greatly affect our neighborhood, as well as the Ford Motor Company, will not be based on so little data and such poor research as now seems to be advocated by first, people who do not live in our neighborhood; second, people who have not investigated any of the opposing facts; third, people who prefer to accept the complacent conclusions advocated by county staff. Fourth, people who believe that receiving expensive gifts from a large corporation is more relevant to changing an ordinance than the effects such an ordinance may have. And fifth, people who believe that by appeasing this same corporation so that it can purportedly quote, remain competitive in the automoaive market, close quote, this same entity will then not withdraw from the county. And sixth, that this appeasement is thus well worth the sacrifice of a small, quiet, rural neighborhood. The Ford test track is there in our neighborhood. We have learned to live with it at its present level of development. Is it too much to ask that the Ford Motor Company also learn to live with us? That would be being a good neighbor. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Additional speakers? MR. BRUET: Good morning, Mr. Chairman. Mike Bruet. I'm here on behalf of the owner of the property, Collier Enterprises. And I just would like to make a couple of comments. I'll be very brief with respect to some things that were said. The testing that we're talking about is -- obviously takes place in January, February and March. It will take place over about a Page 24 I I I II II I I IIII IIIII III II I II IIIIIIII III II III IIII I IIII 16 1 January 15, 1998 20-day period, of which one or two racing vehicles, which I think are probably the biggest concern, will be here. It will be a couple of days: they will be gone. The trucks, this is the major large tractor-trailers, we're talking like one vehicle will be brought down and tested during daylight hours. Tested for aerodynamics, not..performance, not speed. They are here to be tested for aerodynamics and performance. So not speed and -- Secondly, the noise issue that's been brought up. There are county ordinances in place that Ford is willing to live by, obviously, that deal with noise. We're not asking for any revision or amendments with respect to noise. Everything is in place to handle that issue should the neighbors make a call. With respect to Mrs. Gundeck's comment about resurfacinq a portion of Desoto Boulevard, I believe in '84, when George Archibald was the Transportation Director, we realized that Desoto Boulevard was to be cut off by Alligator Alley. And the PUD had been written to resurface the portion from 34th south to the Alley. It seemed rather senseless to go down and resurface a portion of the road that had virtually no property owners. The monies from the funds for resurfacing -- part of the PUD requirements -- was switched, through board direction and board approval, from 34th north up to Golden Gate Boulevard. It was a resurfacing and repair project that actually, Collier Enterprises, Ford and Harper Brothers, the contractor, contributed additional monies at that time to resurface the portion of Desoto north from 34th to Golden Gate Parkway. And that was approved by the board, and I'm sure that can be found in the records if someone takes the time. ' The wildlife issues, stormwater management issues, it's a properly permitted project. There is an eight-foot fence around the property and they have never, in their 15 years, have had an issue with respect to stormwater or wildlife issues, ever, in there. Staff has been very cooperative in trying to assist Ford in their role here, and I simply wanted to say that it seems appropriate to move forward and allow them to take a little additional step. There are ordinances and rules in place that will govern anything outside of the PUD, I'd like to say. I believe Susan Pareigis is here with the EDC that would like to address the board for a moment. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Priddy, you had a question, while Ms. Pareigis is coming up? MR. PRIDDY: Yes, actually two questions. The additional lands in Section 34 and Section 27 to the east, are those panther refuge? MR. BRUET: I believe those are the lands they are speaking of, yes. MR. PRIDDY: Okay. And the question of adequate and proper notice. MR. ARNOLD: That's certainly something that we're looking at. They certainly were not noticed. I understand, and speaking with Mr. Page 25 January 15, 1998 Bruet, that the Florida Panther Refuge and its adjacency possibly within 300 feet of this project has occurred possibly within the last year with some land swaps that the Colliers have made nationwide, and that that may not be reflective. Our tax rolls, as you know and we've dealt with this issue numerous times, it is not instantaneous tax roll information we're using, and many times this tax roll information is 18 months to 24 months old. It meets legally tests for notifying property owners. That's why it's only one form of property owner notification. We post a public ad in the newspaper. We also posted two signs near the project for notification of people in the surrounding area. MR. BRUET: Initially, Collier Enterprises granted an easement to the DET and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, to the lands to the east of the Ford site. When the Phoenix land exchange was put together, the little area to the right there that you see bumped out was supposed to be for a borrow pit, and that was part of the Ford PUD. That was then included as sort of a balance to finish up the land exchange. So that's how the transaction probably took place, within the last year or thereabouts. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Ms. Pareigis, you weren't sworn in, were you? MS. PAREIGIS: Yes, I was. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. MS. PAREIGIS: My name is Susan Pareigis, for the record. I'm the Executive with the Economic Development Council of Collier County and part of the delegation that actually went to Dearborn, Michigan to talk to Ford corporate about their plans for Collier County. I would want to quickly add to the commission's consideration that we have talked extensively with Ford, and Ford, as you may or may not know, has undergone an entire retuning of their operation to maintain their competitiveness internationally. That process is called Ford 2000. In that process, they have actively engaged in reviewing event site that they have for a test track in the world. We are very fortunate to have them as strong corporate neighbors within our community here. I would quickly add, too, to some of the comments that I've heard regarding Ford, we have in the community approached Ford about trying to do generous contributions to the community, and not vice versa. We have not been coerced by Ford. We think they are a strong corporate neighbor and we would hope that you would stringently support this, and show the Board of County Commissioners that we want Ford here and that we think that they are a strong community supporters. And I'd love to answer any questions. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions? Thank you. MS. PAREIGIS: Thank you very much for your time. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Additional speakers on this petition? Page 2 6 January 15, 1998 MS. PAREIGIS: I believe Helene Casteltine, from the county staff, our ombudsperson with Economic Development, as well, was just going to make a brief statement. MS. CASTELTINE: For the record, Helene Casteltine, economic development manager, county staff. And I have not been sworn in. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: If you could raise your right hand, the court reporter will swear you in. (The witness was sworn.) MS. CASTELTINE: I would just like to make a comment just in general to remind the folks in this room, too, that the Board of County Commission has made economic diversification one of it's top priorities for Collier County, and that the Ford Motor Company certainly represents that diversification. They offer high wage jobs to local residents here in Collier County. They are, as Susan Pareigis mentioned, good corporate neighbors. These are the kind of companies that we would like to see expand in Collier County and these are the kind of companies that we would like to attract to Collier County to provide jobs for our local resident here. that's all I have to say. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. ARNOLD: Mr. Chairman, if I might add one other thing. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes. MR. ARNOLD: One other thought occurred to me in reference to the property owner notification. Mr. Krakowski, who is the manager of the Florida Panther Wildlife Refuge, did make contact with my office about a week and a half ago. We traded voice mail messages. He spoke with Cecelia Martin, one of our planning technicians, I believe it was Monday of this week. He was advised of the hearing date for this meeting and the Board of County Commissioners' meeting. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Additional public speakers? Seeing none, I'll close the public -- sir, you've already had an opportunity to speak. With that, I'll close the public hearing. MR. OATES: Mr. Chairman, I would move we recommend for approval the petition -- and I'm not sure whether it's 83-171 or 84-8. There are two numbers that we have here. And so I will move for both of those, with the recommendation of approval, subject to the staff's stipulations, and also with the staff amendment of maximum height of 500 feet for the communications tower. MR. YORK: I'll second. MS. STUDENT: Mr. Chairman, I just need to state something for the record. That I've talked with staff and also Mr. Weigel of our office, and it appears as though that the notification was adequate under our ordinance, inasmuch as we resort to the tax rolls and they are not always current. But in an abundance of caution, if we find out that there's a problem, I've talked to Mr. Arnold. Go ahead and take action today, but if we find out that there was a notification problem our research indicates there is one, this item Page 27 January 15, 1998 may well come back to you again for further consideration of any additional information that may come forth. And you would need to reconsider it, if you will. Again, we've got to iron this out with staff. It's kind of short notice for our staff, especially. But anyway, go ahead and take action today, but I just wanted to put on the record that this may occur. I don't know that it would, but it could. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. With that caution, there's a motion and recommendation of approval by Mr. Oates, seconded by Mr. York. Discussion? The one thing that concerns me about this is the sound level. And the one point that one of the speakers made was the inability of the county to monitor a noise situation. And I have some appreciation for that firsthand, because so often, if there is a violation occurring, the violation's gone by the time it takes staff to get there. And I wonder if there might be able to be some sort of required random monitoring of the facility to be included in the motion. MR. OATES: Mr. Chairman, he was already recommending that normal industrial was 75 and he's requesting 65 during the daytime and 60 at night. I would think that would be sufficient. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Well, living in close proximity to 1-75 with heavy truck traffic, and having done some racing during my life, that those noise levels I'm sure have peaks that are higher than our noise ordinance allows. DR. GORE: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Excuse me, sir. The public portion of this hearing is closed. DR. GORE: Okay. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Seeing no support for that idea, I'll call for the question. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? Myself. So the motion passes six zo one. MR. AP~OLD: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: With than, here's copies of tke various correspondences up here for zhe record, Mr. Mulhere. MR. OATES: There's a picture up here, also. (Exhibits not submitted to court reporter.) CHAIP24AN DAVIS: Next up is petition PUD-97-!6, Mr. Nino. Once again, i would ask all those present that are going to speak on this petition to please stand, raise your right hand so that you may be sworn by the court reporter. (The speakers were sworn.) C?~IF/4AN DAVIS: Thank you. ,MR. NINO: For the record, my name is Ron Nino, Planning Services Department. The petition that's before you -- let me say I apologize for not having our usual fold-out map. I really took the wrong file. However, within your agenda packet that same map is shown on an eight and a half by 11 scale. Page 28 , January 15, 1998 This petition is to rezone property that is currently zoned agricultural. The vast majority of that land is zoned agricultural: however, a small portion, about a hundred or so acres along the most northerly portion of this petition, is currently also zoned PUD. So the action that is contemplated here would have land pulled out of an existing PUD and merged with a new PUD. Total land area is some 485 acres of land. The petition, the land is located on the northwest quadrant or corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and CR 951. This petition asks that you recommend approval of a residential mixed u=~e community that will contain no more than 785 dwelling units within a Master Plant, ed golf course, 18-hole golf course community. As you can see from the map that the petitioner has placed on the board and the Master Plan that is within your PUD packet, this is a parcel of land that has considerable lands that are required ao be preserved by virtue of their wetland condition. So that a sizeable portion of this property will remain in its natural state. How is ahis petition consistent with Collier County's Growth Management Plan? It is located within the urban boundary. The urban boundary provides that land in this location be used for residential purposes at a density not to exceed three dwelling units per acre. The property is also -- the future Land Use Plan for Collier County says that the northwest corner of the property, the 485 acres, is a designated activity center, which for purposes of master planning, says that you may approve of a commercial development at the intersection or the northwest corner of Rattlesnake and CR 951. This PUD, in addition to being a mixed use residential development within a golf course, would also ask that they be allowed to develop a commercial center at the northwest corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. That shopping center will not exceed 150,000 square feet of commercial activities, and is, in fact, a site of 15 acres, which incidentally, is much smaller than they could have otherwise asked for. when you take the base density of three dwelling units per acre and you multiply times 500, this petitioner could have asked for 1500 dwelling units on this property. However, it's probably obvious to you why they are asking for 785, or something less tkan 800, just less than 800, and that is to keep it out of the arena of the Development of Regional Impact, which places far greater requirements upon a petitioner to achieve the ultimate permitting approval. So this petition is consistent with the Future Land Use Element for Collier County. It is also consistent with those elements of the Growth Management Plan that are applicable, and they include traffic circulation. This petition, the traffic generated by this petition will not exceed the significance test of 5 percent on CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. It meets the recreation provision. The recreation element or open space element says that any project which is basically, which is a mixed use project that involves commercial as well as residential, needs to set aside 30 percent of its land area for open space. Page 29 January 15, 1998 Well, this project, including -- this project will, in fact, set aside 70 percent of its area will be in open space; and of course, that includes the golf course. So it far and exceeds the requirements of the open space element of the Comprehensive Plan. The Conprehensive Plan has a conservation and coastal management element. That element says that jurisdictional wetlands need to be preserved. This project undoubtedly will do that, but the ultimate determination of those boundaries, the hard lines, really comes later in the development permitting process. At the time of site development plans and platting it becomes an administrative matter and administratively assures that the conservation and coastal management policies are indeed implemented. The project complies with the waters and sewer and storm, water elements of the Growth Management Plan, because this project will be connected to county sewer and county water, and will have to meet the Water Management District's requirements for stormwater management. Again, elements that are administratively determined at more subsequent development permitting processes. So in conclusion, we can tell you with assurance and certainty that this project complies with all of the applicable elements of the county's Growth Management Plan. Now is it good planning, however. Aside from that fact, is it good planning? And the staff report tells you or suggests to you that development of this land is timely. A major consideration with dealing with rezoning actions is, is it timely? Is their development all around the property? And as you know, there is development to the west and to the north, and there are approved projects to the south. Immediately across the street from this project is the Sierra Meadows PUD,-a 650-unit0 as well as commercial development. It has yet to begin, but the fact remains that it is approved for that use. So this property is within a developing area. It has public infrastructure available to it. So it meets the criterion of the timing is appropriate. Is it compatible? Well, it's adjacent to a residential development to the west; it's residential to the soutk. This is a residential golf course community, generally considered to be the top of the line when we have a golf course as a component of that development. So we conclude that yes, it is indeed compatible. So it meets the major criteria that we generally apply when we recommend approval of a project. The PUD is structured in a mapper consistent with our model PUD, which we think assures you that the development standards will be appropriate and will produce a fine development in this area. There are a few issues, as I always have to tell you, there are a few issues that need to be addressed in the PUD. They are of an insubstantial nature. It usually is what we call wordsmithing. However, in this case, we have completed all of that wordsmithing. It's just that the document you have doesn't reflect the document that Ms. Student has recently agreed meets our legal test of sufficiency. However, the document that's before you does not include within Page 30 January 15, 1998 it recommendations of the Economic Advisory -- Environmental Adviso~z Board. M~. OATES: Got to get him trained one of these days. MR. BRUET: He's new here. MR. NINO: Well, if I were Wayne Arnold, I could say, Bob, pass these out, will you? (Laughter.) MR. NINO: The environmental -- this petitioner had a problem with some of the staff recommendations relative to water management in particular, and decided that before they would acquiesce to including those stipulations within their PUD document, they wanted their day in court before the Environmental Advisory Board, and consequently, the Environmental Advisory Board adopted the stipulations that are in this report. And your action, if it is an action to recommend approval of the PUD, needs to include that the recommendation of the EnviroP,~ental Advisory Board be included within the PUD. That completes my report. The petitioner is here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions of staff? Petitioner? MR. NADEAU: Mr. Chairman, commissioners, it's a pleasure to be before you again this morning. For the record, my name is Dwight Nadeau, McAnly Engineering and Design, representing the petitioner, Toll Brothers, Inc. Mr. Nino gave a very detailed presentation. I'll try and elaborate a little bit about it. The subject property being 485 acres, really only 361 acres of the project area will be within our development area and in our water management. The remaining 124 acres, which is this preserve area to the west, the preserve areas to the ~orth and some of these preserves associated with the golf course, are excluded from the project area, so that it can accept historic offsite runoff in an attempt to address some of the drainage concerns, the regional drainage concerns of the area. This Master Plan was developed as a result of lengthy discussions with the South Florida Water Management District, our water management department, John Bolt and Robert Wiley, as well as the Army Corps of Engineers. The access points to the project being the commercial access point here and the commercial access point here, are consistent with the access management plan as a part of the Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. The access point for the residential on County Road 951 and on Rattlesnake Hammock are really driven by the environmental concerns of the Water Management District and the Army Corps of Engineers. And actually, the Access Management Plan doesn't address those entries to the project that far north or east of the intersection. The spacing between median openings on Rattlesnake Hammock and the Sierra Meadows project to the south meet the spacing requirements of Collier County. And really to conclude, the project site, as you are aware during the EAR review of the Comprehensive Plan amendments, is allowed to Page 31 6G1 January 15, 1998 have 40 acres of commercial. The petitioners are only using 15 acres of the project site. Excluding the 15 acres, they would possibly be able to achieve 3,290 dwelling units over the entire property and we're only asking for 785. Beyond that, I'd be happy to answer any questions. And we've got a panel of experts behind me who would be able to address any environmental concerns or any legal matters that might come up. MR. OATES: Mr. Chairman, I'm not quite clear on one thing. I need to ask both of you, I guess. There was a recommendation, I believe, that the minutes of the Environmental Adviso~I Board go into the PUD in toro? MR. NINO: Yes. MR. NADEAU: We have no objection to that, and in actuality, I've already put the language in the PUD document in my office, b~d that would be presented to the bcard. MR. OATES: Is that not abnormal, though? I mean, I have never seen a PUD document -- at least, I don't think I have -- where you have an additional seven or eight pages. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Staff usually reports to us what occurred at the EAB. MR. NINO: We weren't able to conclude what those water management stipulations ought to be prior to this meeting. MR. NADEAU: Prior to the mailing of the report. MR. NINO: Prior to the mailing of the staff report. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: All right. Ms. Student? MS. STUDENT: Mr. Chairman, I have a problem from a forms standpoint of the PUD, to put minutes directly into it. It can be referenced as an exhibit, and I have no problem with that. And then tak6 the language, whatever the recommendation was, and put that in the appropriate place in the PUD. But just to randomly put minutes in their aside from an exhibit, I do have a problem with that. MR. OATES: That was my point. ~4R. NINO: We're not suggesting that you put minu~es within the PUD document. We're advising you to include in the development commitment section of the PUD the water management stipulations as recommended by the Environmental Advisory Board. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. ,MR. NADEAU: And for the record, those environmental stipulations adopted and recommended to you and the board would be inserted in 7.6 of the PUD document and would follow A, B, and then the balance of the conditions. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Additional questions of the petitioners representative? Thank you. MR. NADEAU: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Additional speakers on this petition? Please come forward, sir. MR. CROUSE: I didn't get sworn in. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: We'll take care of that. If you'd raise your right hand, the court reporter will swear you in. Page 32 I I I II III II I I II II II I I I III II I III I II r' II I i im 16 1 Janua~t 15, 1998 MR. CROUSE: It will be true. I'm Jack Krause, and we live at Wings South Air Park, directly next door to this project. The entire length here is our runway. And neighbors that are golf courses make wonderful neighbors for a runway, because they have a low density of population. And as a whole, we're very much for this project. We do have one stipulation, however. With a golf course, so many buyers come in and they buy on a weekend, that we would like it in writing to each prospective buyer that there is an existing airport next door that has been there for 25 years. So that they won't get any big surprise if an airplane lands or takes off. Because the only way to land or take off an airplane is to come close to the ground and that is relative to this project. And there's one other stipulation. I think there ought to be a pretty good fence in between that would prevent dogs from accessing our runway, because that is very dangerous to a pilot, to have a dog out there. ~R. OATES: Mr. Chairman, I don't think the one idea is a bad one but I think that big, what 120 some acres, is that what you told me, Dwight? MR. NADEAU: It's actually 121 acres, including this preserve area to the west of the property, on the west property boundary and this preserve area. That's the total. MR. CROUSE: We've discussed this in our community and we couldn't get a better neighbor, especially with all this land here in between. And I don't see any on objection at all from our community, but I only represent 59 lot owners. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Thank you. MR. OATES: I would certainly agree with the gentleman, though, that probably someplace in it, I don't know how we can require it, but in their brochures or whatever, the people do know that there is an airport next door, or air park. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Sir, you'll have to come back up to the microphone to speak. MR. CROUSE: Naples Heritage to the north of us is another community just like this. And they did put it in writing for any of the prospective buyers. And it was required at the time by the zoning commission to be put in, and I think you will agree with that. MS. STUDENT: I'll just state for the record that I've seen PUD documents with language like that in it, and it's probably in the Naples Heritage one. MR. YORK: Also, the one if you recall, Fiddler's Creek had it. MR. NINO: Fiddler's Creek. If I may, Mr. Chairman, if we have that type of language in PUDs that are directly in the flight path of a runway. Naples Heritage has a provision in it because it is directly in the flight path of the north-south runway. This airport only has a north-south runway. And as a matter of fact, there is a provision to the land on the south side of Rattlesnake opposite, I believe it's College Park PUD, that has that language. Page 33 · 16(;1 January 15, 1998 But that language is driven by the fact that it is directly within the flight path of a runway. You really don't have that here. However, if the petitioner doesn't have a problem with notifying every buyer of land within this PUD, that nearby is an airport, staff certainly doesn't have a problem with it. But we don't think that is the same type of situation as existed with the North Naples PUD, the Heritage PUD, and the College Park PUD to the south, nor the Fiddler's Creek, which was again, in the flight path of the Marco Island airport. MR. YORK: It was more than just a flight path. Say when an airplane comes in for landing, there is some point in time where it has to circle over the field for some purpose or another. And I think it's absolutely imperative that we put a navigation easement in the PUD documents to protect the other people. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Maybe the representative of the petitioner, can you make this easy for us? MR. NADEAU: Absolutely. Having spoken with the petitioner, we have no objection to including a provision in the PUD documents such the homeowners documents of the Naples Forest Countr~ Club Master Association would identify a runway to the west, and that there would be periodic air traffic. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. MR. NADEAU: And I'll work with staff for the appropriate place to locate that in the PUD. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Very good. MR. WRAGE: Just a question. Es that a private -- that is a private airport; is that correct? MR. NINO: Yes. -MR. PEDONE: Only for the residents. MR. WRAGE: For the residents only? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I don't believe it's an amenity that they can sell here. (Laughter.) .MR. WRAGE: Just pointing it out. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Additional speakers on this petition? Please come forward. Do we need to swear you in, too? .MR. SMITH: Yes. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Raise your right hand. (The speaker was sworn.) ,MR. SMITH: For the record my name it is Wayne Smith, and i am actually a property owner on both sides of this property. I also own in Wings South. So that was a concern to me, as well, that the people be notified. But I own opposite of the commercial area on the east side of 951, and for the record, I'm in favor of this here. It's been a long time coming, of course. I see no problem with it. The road has been improved, four-laned on 951 should be able to handle the traffic. There is a median access already in place with turn lanes, and that sort of thing, that was put there partly to facilitate my operation, which is a landscape nursery on the east side, but Page 34 ................................................ III I January 15, 1998 constructed in such a manner that there will be access into the commercial area. I presume -- does the access line up with the existing median cut now, the median exit? Do you know? MR. NADEAU: The access point here -- again for the record, Dwight Nadeau0 McAnly Engineering. The access point here on the north side of the activity center, conforms with the Access Management Plan. Therefore, any access to the west -- excuse me -- to the east of 951, would also have to conform with that same Access Management Plan. MR. SMITH: My only question is it the one that is currently existing? There is already a median cut there at that point, or at some point nearby there. MR. NADEAU: Yes. It aligns with A Better Way Nursery. MR. SMITH: That's the one I meant. Just wanted to make sure they weren't going to close down my access and build a knew one. CHAIRM3~ DAVIS: You also got a commercial. MR. SMITH: That's all I have to say, then. Thank you. i approve of it. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Thank you for coming. Additional speakers on this petition? Mr. Volpe? MR. VOLPE: Chairman Davis, members of the board, for the record my name is Michael Volpe. I'm an attorney with the law firm of Treiser, Kobza and Volpe. And I'm here this morning representing the co-trustees of the Bernard Savage Trust. If I might, could I ask the members of the board to look at your agenda package, the site plan which is included, and you'll see that the parcel which is the subject of this petition is outlined in dark, bol~ lining. Immediately to the north is a parcel of land between the Club Estates and what has been l=beled as the Casa del Sol PUD. The clients that I represent own that parcel of land between those two identity points. That parcel of land is within the current Casa del Sol PUD Zoning District which was approved by the Collier County Board of Commissioners in 1989. In 1997, the Casa del Sol PUD was extended for an additional period of one year. So the Casa del Sol PUD, which includes a parcel of land which is the subject of this petition, and the other parcel of land, which is owned by my client which is not included in this petition, is already a part of an approved PUD. You are not, this morning, involved in an amendment process of an existing PUD. If I can refer you to your staff report again, on page 2, in the second paragraph, your staff says that in its opinion, the owner of land within a PUD where property ownerships are clearly separate from one another as opposed to held jointly, has the right to withdraw the current PUD, in essence nullifying unified plan of development and forcing an amendment on the part of the remaining property owner, that deals only with the remaining property. So essentially, what we have is a situation where one of the owners of an existing, approved PUD has decided that he doesn't like Page 35 .... i ~ ~, I I I I I I II II Ill~· I II I I January 15, 1998 the situation, and he's decided to go off on his own and has attempted and is in this process attempting to join his parcel with another parcel of land to the south to form a new PUD. As I said, this PUD was approved in 1989. It was extended in 1997. In the PUD, there was a commitment -- in fact, there were a number of commitments that were reqUired to be made as a part of this agreement with the county. One of the commitments was the setting aside of a 25-foot right-of-way for the widening of 951, which has occurred. We're here this morning for the purpose of trying to work cooperatively, but believe that in this instance, the process that is being used here is not the proper process. That's a legal argument. I have addressed this to your staff. We've had some discussions. I do want, however, to make you aware of the seriousness of what this process may result in. There is an inaccuracy, in my opinion, in your staff report which I would like to bring to your attention and make a part of tke record. in the next paragraph on page 2, where they are referring to the separate ownership, it says that: "This condition came about because a contract purchaser required control of two separately held parcels of land. That entity was the petitioner who sought and obtained the rezoning action to a PUD. The entity lost control of the properties by failing to meet the terms of the Contract Purchase Agreement and subsequently the original owners regained ownership of the land." Originally separate parcels of land; both of these property owners are under contract to sell their land, conditioned on getting the Casa del Sol PUD approved. The board approved the Casa del Sol PUD and there was a closing that occurred. And a company by the name of Shrewsbury & Associates took title to this property. There were mortgages that were given back to the owners and the sellers of the property. Default in the mortgage; it goes into bankruptcy, and the trustee in bankruptcy, as a part of the liquidation process, decides to give the original owner of Parcel A title to his property, and the original owner of Parcel B -- those are the two parcels within Casa del Sol -- their lands back. But that, in and of itself, didn't affect, in my legal opinion, the zoning on the property. Staff would suggest that there was never any unity of control or unified control. But, in fact, there was. In this instance, what we would like to do and what we have attempted to do, is to get back into the process and to do this in a proper planning way, so that we look at this entire area and the parcel that remains, which is a hundred acres of the original 240 acres, which comprises the approved Casa del Sol PUD. We would like for the planning commission to defer any action on this petition, because of the situation and the involvement of the Casa del Sol PUD, for a period of perhaps as long as six months, to allow us to get into the planning process to see whether there are, in fact, any overlapping issues. What the effect may have been by the dedication and the reservation of right-of-way for 951. What are the Page 36 January 15, 1998 rights of the remaining owner of this PUD with respect to the development of his parcel. Staff has mentioned that there are several issues having to do with water management in this particular area of our county. To what extent is there a requirement or a need for a cooperative effort between these adjoining property owners? We only became aware -- you can say, well, where have you been in this process? We only became aware of this petition because of a letter that was sent by Mr. Nino on October 20th. I mentioned at the outset that I represent the co-trustees of a trust. One of the trustees is the NationsBank. They're out of Baltimore. By the time this letter found its way onto the right desk of the right person, there was a delay. And also, they were far along in the planning process. This petition was filed in the very first part of October. So we were not made aware and we had no occasion to know what was going on in the planning process. The other trustee is not a resident of Collier County; he lives in Boca Raton, so he would not have normally been made aware. And to my knowledge, there were no notices sent to property owners within the 300 feet. Presumably that was done, but we have no record of anyone, or the two clients that I represent, ever having received notification of the zoning petition. So just to summarize, we have an existing PUD which was approved, and it has not been sunset. It continues until December of 1998. You've got an attempt by one of the owners of a parcel of property within an existing PUD, trying to make a decision concerning a change in zoning in his parcel without the consent of the other owner of the land within that approved PUD. -This is not the right process. We'll work together to see how this can be developed in everyone's best interest, but we simply need more time and we think it would behoove the planning commission to simply defer any action and we will work diligently and we have corresponded with your staff and asked for their cooperation to get us into the planning process so that these two petitions -- if that's what they do, in fact, turn out to be -- get into an amendment process. And you can look at this as an amendment of an existing PUD, as what it should be, rather than just one property owner trying to go in a separate direction. If there are any questions, I'd be happy to answer them. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions? Mr. Priddy? MR. PRIDDY: Mr. Volpe, I'm not sure that it could totally consist of an existing PUD because there is some additional lands added to the south to what this petitioner is wanting to do. So everything can't be -- that they are wanting to do, can't be taken care of in a PUD amendment for the Casa del Sol. So I see an issue. MR. VOLPE: Well, I understand the question, Mr. Priddy. In this instance, in terms of amending an existing PUD by adding property outside of an approved PUD, that could be included in an amendment process. That's simply what we would be talking about. Page 37 January 15, 1998 But this is not an amendment of an existing PUD. This is a new petition, where this person's coming in, and instead of -- he's identified that the current zoning on my property is PUD, but that PUD includes something more than his parcel of land. It includes another !00 acres. And there is -- and I have it available, and i'm sure your staff does, as well -- the PUD for the Casa del Sol PUD. There are 38 different commitments that have been made. Some of those commitments have already been implemented, i.e., the 25-foot right-of-way, the median -- the costs and responsibilities for the medians. There's been no development; there's been no construction, no vertical construction, no infrastructure has been installed. Does that answer your question, Mr. Priddy? MR. PRIDDY: Yes. As far as the 25 foot easement goes, your clients were going to have to give up that 25 feet, regardless of whether that was separate or included or whatever. So I don't see that as an issue. MR. VOLPE: Well, you're absolutely right. The only reason why I mention that, is that this was a commitment that was made at the time that this was approved in 1989. We acknowledge that commitment. The 25 feet has, in fact, been taken. But what are our remaining rights under our PUD? I mean, do we have vested rights? What's going to happen to -- this PUD allows, for example, one of the uses within the approved PUD, is manufactured homes. Do we have the right to continue to develop the site for manufactured homes? What I'm suggesting to you is that there are legal issues that we can try to resolve with your staff, and there are planning issues that we would be happy to try to work with your planning staff, to work out.' But in terms of a process, I don't think for as long as any of you who have sat here, you have ever seen -- and I've been wrong a number of times in the past -- a situation where you have got one owner of an approved PUD coming before this board and saying I'm not particularly happy with this PUD; I've got a better opportunity to join up with a parcel adjoining my parcel, and I'd lik= to take -- I'd like to unilaterally take my parcel out of the PUD and go ahead and have it -- have you consider it for a new PUD, and let the other person, who's got a half of a PUD left, decide what he's going to do. MR. YORK: Can I ask a question of -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. York? Ms. STUDENT: I'm familiar with this issue, so -- MR. YORK: Doesn't this become a civil issue? I mean, what is your recommendation to this panel? MS. STUDENT: Well, my recommendation and I'll just give you a rundown. First of all, there is no case law in Florida directly on point and this was a case of the first impression for me. But we have a requirement, and it is a code requirement, that there be unified control of a PUD. And that's probably why we have it. Because of circumstances beyond the control of these property owners, the bankruptcy or trustee in bankruptcy sought to give back each parcel to the people that had held the mortgage, as I understand Page 38 January 15, 1998 it. So at that point, there ceased to be unified control. It would be my opinion because it's a code requirement that that unified control exists, that at that point, the county would have been well within its right to come and look at that PUD and -- for itself, because there's a code violation, to rezone it back to, out of PUD because of a lack of unified control. Let each property owner stay where they were and do whatever they needed to do with their property. However, we have a situation where property owner A is before you in this proceeding to rezone that portion of the PUD, along with some adjoining property. And I understand that property owner B, who Mr. Volpe represents, has already come to start the process and that they had a pre-app meeting with Mr. Bellows, who I don't know if he stayed or not. And I would look at it this way. We are, usually don't like to continue items unless eve~'body can agree, and the representatives that are here today for property A, as I have called it, have not agreed to do that. And I represented to Mr. Volpe that from my purposes, I will give expedited review to his PUD when it comes through from my office. And so I believe that we don't have any problem today with going forward. I will mention that I have a concern that where one -- in a situation like this, where one property owner could attempt to hold another hostage, and that we would require consent, that that may be an invalid delegation of our authority to one of the property owners. And I do have a problem, so I think there's a legal problem there. So I would recommend that if everybody could have agreed to continue this for a bit, that would have been fine. But if this property owner doesn't wish to do it, I feel that we can go forward. Mr. Volpe's client's already in the process. Furthermore, if there is a problem with that neighboring property to the north, or -- well, I don't know if it's, I guess to the south -- we could go back and perhaps amend that PUD if we had to. That would be this one that's the subject of the hearing today, if there was some problem with the other PUD property owner who Mr. Volpe represents, then it would seem that we could adjust this one at a later point, and that might serve the same purpose. MR. YORK: So what we're saying then, at one point in time there was unified control. MS. STUDENT: Right. MR. YORK: That was dissipated by the referee in bankruptcy --. MS. STUDENT: That's correct. MR. YORK: Therefore, there was no unified control or violation of ordinance or -- MS. STUDENT: I think it's a code violation -- MR. YORK: -- of the code. MS. STUDENT: -- but not through any fault of the property owners. MR. YORK: Well, each owner got their own property rights back and can do whatever they want to do. Is that what you're saying to Page 39 16Gl January 15, 1998 us? MS. STUDENT: it's still a PUD. But what I'm saying is i think the county would have been within its authority to look at each of those and rezone it back to what it was, and let each one go their separate way. That's effectively what's happening now, because they are both in the process without the rezone back to ag, which, you know, there could be some problems wi~h that. But in any event, that's effectively what's happening. And what Mr. Volpe seeks is to continue this matter to see if there is any overlapping problem with his PUD. I talked to staff a little bit and I don't think there is. But i think there's a mechanism to deal with that, absent this petitioner's acquiescence or agreeing to continue his item. I still think there's a mechanism where we can handle it. So I think it's okay, in other words, to go forward today, i think these things can be worked out. MR. VOLPE: May I respond, Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Please do. Mlq. VOLPE: Jusu a couple of issues. Number one, I believe Y~. York mentioned isn't this a civil matter. It may very well be a civil matter between the owner of Parcel A and Parcel B. But instead, what's happened is, they have circumvented whatever dispute they may have. If there is a partition action or if there is an adjudication to be made as to what their rights are, perhaps that is a matter to be determined by the circuit court. But in this instance, the county has intervened in that instance and has simply said that we are of the opinion that this PUD was effectively negated by what happened as a result of the foreclosure and the bankruptcy proceedings. ' Ms. Student says well, there is no longer unified control. Well, there wasn't unified control in 1997, under her theory, when the Board of County Commissioners approved a one-year extension of the PUD, number one. Number two is, if we could reverse this for the moment, i would like to see if the county came to my client and said you've made 58 commitments in this PUD, and we wish you to set aside that 25-foot right-of-way and our answer would be well, there isn't unified control any longer, so we don't feel as though we are bound Dy any of those commitments that we may have made. All we're asking is, we have had, if you call it a pre-app discussion with the staff, we've been thrown into a situation of catching up. What do we do now? What are our rights? So we have attempted to meet with the staff to determine a process. I don't disagree with Ms. Student. The county could have initiated a petition to go through a rezoning process to dissolve this PUD. But the county is not the petitioner here. This is not the right procedure to get where you want to get. And Ms. Student makes the observation, well, if we find out at a later point in time there are reasons why this PUD which you have before you this morning should be amended, well, we can simply bring that back at that time and go through the amendment process. Page 40 January Well, doesn't it make more sense from a planning perspec look at this together? I mean, another two or three -- I mean, the land, the work's been done. But it's your responsibility to make sure that it's done in a proper way, and tha% you've considered all of the adjoining property owners and their interests. And again, a delay of three or four months, in my view, what's the prejudice? What does that do? None, as far as I'm concerned. I'm sure the petitioner will have another. But I'm saying from a practical perspective. Are there any other questions that I can answer? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any questions of Mr. Volpe? Thank you. MR. VOLPE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: With the additional public speakers and with the issue that's been raised here, I'm sure that a representative of the petitioner is going to want to speak to us. MR. sAMAHA: Good morning. My name is Steve Samaha. I'm with the law firm of Annis, Mitchell. I represent Toll Brothers, Inc., who is the applicant on this rezoning. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: You were sworn, sir? MR. SAMAHA: Yes, sir, I was. CF~IRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. SAMAHA: Before I address this issue that was just raised, I'd just for 30 seconds like to tell you a little bit about Toll Brothers. They are the nation's leading luxury home builder; they are a publicly traded company. They operate in 14 states, have 122 active communities; four projects over in Palm Beach; a project up in Tampa; a project in Sarasota; project in Gulf Harbor and a project in Pelican Landing. And this is their first project in Collier County and they are looking forward to doing business here. It's, I guess, a mildly interesting question raised by ~4r. Volpe. The fact of the matter is, these two property owners, both of whom are lawyers, both of whom have owned their property for over 30 years, could have easily agreed by contract between themselves, if they wanted to, ~ha~ they would put their projects in together, work together, and there is all sorts of mechanisms for doing that. They elected not to do that. Someone came to them and bought property from them, decided he was going to put a mobile home project out here, couldn't get it done defaulted on his mortgages. They both ended up where they started from. There is absolutely no reason, legal or otherwise, that we shouldn't be able to proceed today. I think your staff has told you that, your attorney has told you that. I agree with that. I zhink it would be effectively putting the county zoning and planning power into the hands of a private party by allowing him to hold up a process where all the procedural requirements have been complied with. I don't believe that should be done. They should know a lot about their property if they've owned it for 30 years. I think any of us that have owned our property for that Page 41 16G . January 15, 1998 long would know a little about it and what issues they may or may not have with what we were doing, and make those points in the normal process, which is the forum we're in today. So, I'm not too sympathetic with, we haven't had enough time learn about our property. They have known about it since at least in October of last year, and you know, I think there's been ample time for them to understand whatever issues they may have. And like any member of the public or adjoining property owners can raise an issue in these public processes. So timing is very important to us, as I'm sure you all know. And in terms of the real estate and development business, you really can't afford delays. There is a lot of time consuming processes anyway. But to take any type of delay is really not in our best interests and we really don't want to do that. And we look forward to doing business here on behalf of Toll and Collier County, and developing a really beautiful project that we can all be proud of. If you have any questions, i'd be glad to answer them for you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions? Thank you. Additional speaker? MR. GRANT: Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, I'm Richard Grant; I'm an attorney. I represent the owner of, I will call it the Israelson property, which is -- I forget whether it's Tract A or B -- but it's the property that is the object of the rezoning that Toll Brothers is seeking before you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And you have been sworn, sir? MR. GRANT: Yes, sir, I have. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. - MR. GRANT: I'm here for a couple of reasons. I personally have a ve~t long history with both of these properties, as all parties in this room are well aware. I have represented the Savage trust in the past. I am representing the property that is the object of the rezoning at this point, the sellers of it. My client is not here today, and I'm here basically to inform you that my client would like to have you make a decision today recommending approval. It believes that what Toll Brothers seeks to do with this property that it's contracted to sell to it is a desirable thing and it would very much like to see you approve of it. I do want to speak a little bit to the issue regarding the Casa del Sol PUD, and to some extent, I might even, I suppose, be considered to be a fact witness because of some past involvement. I'm not in a position, really, to refute something that Mr. Volpe said, but I believe it's inaccurate. I actually just asked him and he says he believes he's correct, but I don't believe he has the paperwork. It may not matter legally, but I think it is important, and that is that it's my recollection tha: when these two parties contracted to sell their property back in the late 1980s to the entity that acquired it, Shrewsbury Associates, it is my recollection that at the time that those properties were sold, that is to say title passed, Page 42 January 15, 1998 us? MS. STUDENT: It's still a PUD. But what I'm saying is I think the county would have been within its authority to look at each of those and zezone it back to what it was, and let each one go their separate way. That's effectively what's happening now, because they are both in the process without the rezone back to ag, which, you know, there could be some problems with that. But in any event, that's effectively what's happening. And what Mr. Volpe seeks is to continue this matter to see if there is any overlapping problem with his PUD. I talked to staff a little bit and I don't think there is. But I think there's a mechanism to deal with that, absent this petitioner's acquiescence or agreeing to continue his item. I still think there's a mechanism where we can handle it. So I think it's okay, in other words, to go forward today. I think these things can be worked out. MR. VOLPE: May I respond, Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Please do. MR. VOLPE: Just a couple of issues. Number one, I believe .Mr. York mentioned isn't this a civil matter. It may very well be a civil matter between the owner of Parcel A and Parcel B. ~ut instead, what's happened is, they have circumvented whatever dispute they may have. If there is a partition action or if there is an adjudication to be made as to what their rights are, perhaps that is a matter to be determined by the circuit court. But in this instance, the county has intervened in that instance and has simply said that we are of the opinion that this PUD was effectively negated by what happened as a result of the foreclosure and the bankruptcy proceedings. Ms. Student says well, there is no longer unified control. Well, there wasn't unified control in 1997, under her theory, when the Board of County Commissioners approved a one-year extension of the PUD, number one. Number two is, if we could reverse this for the moment, I would like ~o see if the county came to my client and said you've made ~8 commitments in this PUD, and we wish you to set aside that 25-foot right-of-way and our answer would be well, there isn't unified control any longer, so we don't feel as though we are bound }3y any of those commitments that we may have made. All we're asking is, we have had, if you call it a pre-app discussion with the staff, we've been thrown into a situation of catching up. What do we do now? What are our rights? So we have attempted to meet with the staff to determine a process. I don't disagree with Ms. Student. The county could have initiated a petition to go through a rezoning process to dissolve this PUD. But the county is not the petitioner here. This is not the right procedure to get where you want to get. And Ms. Student makes the observation, well, if we find out at a later point in time there are reasons why this PUD which you have before you this morning should be amended, well, we can simply bring that back at that time and go through the amendment process. Page 40 I IIII III III I I II IIII II I II II III I IIIII II IIIIIIIIII II IIII II I I ~ 1651 January 15, 1998 Well, doesn't it make more sense from a planning perspective, to look at this together? I mean, another two or three months, another -- I mean, the land, the work's been done. But it's your responsibility to make sure that it's done in a proper way, and that you've considered all of the adjoining property owners and their interests. And again, a delay of three or four months, in my view, what's the prejudice? What does that do? None, as far as I'm concerned. I'm sure the petitioner will have another. But I'm saying from a practical perspective. Are there any other questions that I can answer? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any questions of Mr. Volpe? Thank you. MR. VOLPE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: With the additional public speakers and with the issue that's been raised here, I'm sure that a representative of the petitioner is going to want to speak to us. MR. S~4AHA: Good morning. My name is Steve Samaha. I'm with the law firm of Annis, Mitchell. I represent Toll Brothers, Inc., who is the applicant on this rezoning. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: You were sworn, sir? MR. SAMAHA: Yes, sir, I was. CF~IRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. SAMAHA: Before I address this issue that was just raised, I'd just for 30 seconds like to tell you a little bit about Toll Brothers. They are the nation's leading luxury home builder; they are a publicly traded company. They operate in 14 states, hav~ 122 active communities; four projects over in Palm Beach; a project up in Tampa; a project in Sarasota; project in Gulf Harbor and a project in Pelican Landing. And this is their first project in Collier County and they are looking forward to doing business here. It's, I guess, a mildly interesting question raised by Mr. Volpe. The fact of the matter is, these two property owners, both of whom are lawyers, both of whom have owned their property for over 30 years, could have easily agreed by contract between themselves, if they wanted to, that they would put their projects in together, work together, and there is all sorts of mechanisms for doing that. They elected not to do that. Someone came to them and bought property from them, decided he was going to put a mobile home project out here, couldn't get it done defaulted on his mortgages. They both ended up where they started from. There is absolutely no reason, legal or otherwise, that we shouldn't be able to proceed today. I think your staff has told you that, your attorney has told you that. I agree with that. I think it would be effectively putting the county zoning and planning power into the hands of a private party by allowing him to hold up a process where all the procedural requirements have been complied with. I don't believe that should be done. They should know a lot about their property if they've o~ed it for 30 years. I think any of us that have owned our property for that Page 41 16Gl January 15, 1998 long would know a little about it and what issues they may or may not have with what we were doing, and make those points in the normal process, which is the forum we're in today. So, I'm not too sympathetic with, we haven't had enough time learn about our property. They have known about it since at least in October of last year, and you know, I think there's been ample time for them to understand whatever issues they may have. And like any member of the public or adjoining property owners can raise an issue in these public processes. So timing is very important to us, as I'm sure you all know. And in terms of the real estate and development business, you really can't afford delays. There is a lot of time consuming processes anyway. But to take any type of delay is really not in our best interests and we really don't want to do that. And we look forward to doing business here on behalf of Toll and Collier County, and developing a really beautiful project that we can all be proud of. if you have any questions, I'd be glad to answer them for you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions? Thank you. Additional speaker? MR. GRANT: Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, I'm Richard Grant; i'm an attorney. I represent the owner of, I will call it the Israelson property, which is -- I forget whether it's Tract A or B -- but it's the property that is the object of the rezoning that Toll Brothers is seeking before you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And you have been sworn, sir? MR. GRANT: Yes, sir, I have. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. GRANT: I'm here for a couple of reasons. I personally have a ve~t long history with both of these properties, as all parties in this room are well aware. I have represented the Savage trust in the past. I am representing the property that is the object of the rezoning at this point, the sellers of it. My client is not here today, and I'm here basically to inform you ~kat my client would like to have you make a decision today recommending approval. It believes that what Toll Brothers seeks to do with this property that it's contracted to sell to it is a desirable thing and it would very much like to see you approve of it. I do want to speak a little bit to the issue regarding the Casa del Sol PUD, and to some extent, I might even, I suppose, be considered to be a fact witness because of some past involvement. I'm not in a position, really, to refute something that Mr. Volpe said, but I believe it's inaccurate. I actually just asked him and he says he believes he's correct, but I don't believe he has the paperwork. It may not matter legally, but I think it is important, and that is that it's my recollection that when these two parties contracted to sell their property back in the late 1980s to the entity that acquired it, Shrewsbury Associates, it is my recollection that at the time that those properties were sold, that is to say title passed, Page 42 January 15, 1998 that the zoning had not then been approved. I don't know whether it had even been applied for; it may have been, and I will stand corrected if somebody will show me where I'm wrong. I'm just telling you my recollection. I believe it was zoned subsequent to the point in time when Shrewsbury & Associates took title, to it. I don't think that makes any difference really legally as to the legal issues. I just think it makes it more compelling. There has not ever been an agreement between these two property owners with respect to joint development of it, for the obvious reason that there had never been any expectation on their part to do that. They both had sold the property to one common entity who hopefully was going to do that, and it just didn't come to pass, and the foreclosures ensued and the bankruptcy that you've heard about that resulted in each of them getting their property back. The County Commission did -- and I thought it was in December of 1996, perhaps it was in early 1997 -- approve a continuation of the Casa del Sol PUD until the end of 1998. It came up for review under the sunset ordinance. The Israelsons objected to that, requested that it not be continued. Actually requested that it just be put back in a category of interim agriculture, because they did not believe that there was any expectation that the Casa del Sol PUD could be developed or would be developed, the lack of common ownership being one of the reasons. But the County Commission did continue it. I agree with that. So those are the facts. But I do not believe that the county -- and i appreciate the situation that the.Savage trust finds itself in. The client I'm representing at this point certainly wishes that they would be able to do as they wish with their property, does not wish to be uncooperative in the least, but simply does not wish to have this petition be delayed because of their circumstances. And I'll be happy to answer questions, and those are my comments. MR. OATES: I guess I°m not quite clear. Do you represent the owner of the 140 north acres or -- MR. SAMAHA: I represent the owner of all of the property that ~s the object. MR. OATES: The whole schemer, the whole 485 acres? MR. SAMARA: Yes, sir. It is the same owner that owns all of that property. MIK. OATES: Okay. MR. SAMAHA: The north 140 or 50 is part of the Casa del Sol PUD. MR. OATES: Okay. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. SAMARA: Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Additional speakers? Mr. Assad? MR. ASSAD: For the record, I'm Waafa Assad, and I've been sworn. I'm here on behalf of the Savage interest, which is the remaining 100 acres of the Casa del Sol, to make sure that it gets planned right and possibly developed, as well. The situation that we are confronted with is that we have half a Page 43 January 15, 1998 PUD, like somebody would take the north two inches of that map, and you draw a resultant line with complete disregard to land uses, golf course layout, or right of ways, and they say this is your PUD, but this is the Master Plan that you are left with. So ever since it came to our attention about this problem we have contacted staff, we met several times. And our interest is simply to make sure that we can plan our property, identify the issues, and make sure that whatever coordinations or anything that requires consent between the two parties, would be worked out prior to giving one of them all the privileges, and we are held back with no assurances. In our meetings with staff, as an example, we were told that we need to do a advised environmental analysis of the site because of the environmental conditions have changed, and that would dictate a new Master Plan for the property. So the remaining half of the Casa del Sol PUD may not be developed as it was originally envisioned, or anything even closer to that. And we said, "Fine." Then we called for another meeting with the county staff to qo identify precisely what is it that is requested of us so we can expeditiously plan and identify the issues and get on with our business. And in that meeting, the planner in charge was not aware of prior conversations or facilitations that were offered in the prior meeting. They insisted that we do a full-fledged EIS, and we do have a new set of requirements. So the position that I find myself in is that I have this piece of land that I would like to plan and develop, I have half of an existing PUD which is worthless. I was told that I can keep the density, but I have to revise the Master Plan. And I need somebody to tell me that you would be required to do an EIS, or we would waive the EIS. You are required to do an environmental analysis and come up with a conceptual plan. There was another issue that there may be new right of ways coming on top of our property that will need to connect from County Barn Road to 951. So there are several issues. Now, we know that simple planning is very logical. So if you can put zhe legal issues that were raised today aside for a second, and you think about the logic and the common sense of master planning the balance of Casa del Sol, doesn't it make sense that you hold it a little bit so we can identify the issues? So we get on our feet and we can identify what will happen to the balance of this property that you are taking away today? So it defies logic. It makes absolutely no sense to take one-half and run with it when you don't know what's going to happen with the balance of the property. So all we're asking is a delay so that the owners and the developers of the upper half of the Casa del Sol PUD would have the opportunity to identify the issues, work them out; and there may be nothing. There may be no disagreements, there may be nothing that needs to be coordination. But at this time, all we're saying is we need a little bi~ of time to catch up with the process and get on an equal footing, so that Page 44 January 15, 1998 you can look at the total picture before you take one-half of the Casa del Sol PUD out. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. AdditiOnal speakers on this petition? MR. SA';AGE: Good morning. I'm Steven Savage. I am a co-trustee and beneficiary under the trust of this property to the north of the one part of the PUD that you're discussing today. Waafa and Mr. Volpe are working with me. I have asked them to investigate what's going on, because unlike the other situation, where I came over a few months ago on a hearing of the Naples National course, I got notification. I don't recall getting any notification about this one, except I got a phone call a few weeks ago, at which time I asked Mr. Assad, and Mr. Assad said yes, he'd look incu it, and he suggested I get in touch with Mr. Volpe. Who said he'd look into it, as well. I asked the co-trustee to send a representative down from Baltimore to attend this hearing. As far as I knew, we had a PUD that was in effect and was supposed to remain in effect until the end of this year. Now, I have no problem with Toll Brothers. I have no be problem with the development going forward. I do have a problem with the possibility of any advantages or rights that have accrued as a result of our years of ownership and attempted sale to a developer, that we've paid for dearly in time and money, to see him taken away arbitrarily, without an opportunity to find out what the highest and best use that I have is under this set of circumstances. So I asked these gentlemen to get involved to help us find out where we stand. I don't want to be a stumbling block. I just want to make sure that I have everything that I'm entitled to. That's all. Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Savage. Additional speakers on this petition? Seeing none -- yes. MR. NINO: Mr. Chairman, if I may shed some other ~ight on petition. While it's not exactly the same as this situation, nonetheless, we do have precedent in terms of a piece of a PUD being sold to adjacent property and it being pulled out of the PUD that was a part of. And I would remind you of the Parklands PUD. What happens is that the act of pulling a piece of property out of an approved for all practical purposes, renders the Master Plan, it makes it no longer applicable; which means that the balance needs to come in and ask for an amendment to their Master Plan and make the commensurate reduction in the amount of development based on the gross acreage that they own. I also would suggest to you that if you go back to the parent parcel, the parcels are made whole. There is nothing in our requirements that says properties need to be joined together. That individual PUDs, that you can come in and ask for a rezoning strictly on the land that you own. Page 45 January 15, 1998 And I would remind you of the Club Estates immediately to the no.ch of the Savage-NacionsSank property. ThaC they were able to deal with a PUD entirely within the boundaries of their property. I would also suggest, as I did at meetings with the petitioners, that in the real world, the Casa del Sol PUD Master Plan is not a viable Master Plan to begin with. It was never -- it has achieved no permitting from the Water Management District. And I think we know enough about the environmental conditions in this area to know that that plan would have had to have been substantially altered, in any event. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Did you have something you wanted to add as the petitioner's representative before we close the public hearing? MR. NADEAU: Not anything to add, but we're not willing to entertain any continuance. We'd like to move forward today, commissioners. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. With that, I'll close the public hearing. MR. PRIDDY: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to recommend that we approve PUD-97-16; recommend for approval. MR. BUDD: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion of approval by -- recommendation of approval by Mr. Priddy, seconded by Mr. Budd. Discussion? With that, I'll call the question. Ail those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. MR. NINO: For the record, that includes Environmental Advisory Board recommendation? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: The attachment of it. MR. OATES: No, the incorporation of it. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: The incorporation of it. We're going to take a five minute break. (A recess was taken.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I'll call the meeting back to order. And the last item on our agenda today is PUD-97-18. I'd ask all those present that may want speak on this petition, so the court reporter may swear you in. (Ail speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Mr. Nino? MR. NINO: Yes. For the record, my name is Ron Nino. I understand from Mr. Priddy that your package didn't include a plan. I think it's important that you look at the plan and get an appreciation of the facts. MR. PRIDDY: Location map. MIR. NINO: And this map here -- if you'd give it back to me -- thank you. The property -- the petition that's before you asks you to recommend rezoning land, and I think it's important to appreciate this fact. Rezoning land that is currently rezoned multiple family and Page 46 January 15, 1998 allows, currently allows up to six dwelling units per acre to be constructed on this property. The reason for the PUD, however, is to establish development standards that are not allowed under the RMF-12 multiple family classification. The RMF-12 multiple family district allows buildings of 50 feet in height. This petition, and by virtue of the PUD, you know, where you can ask for your own development agenda, seeks to allow buildings that, in fact, would be 15 stories over parking, and allows massing arrangements that are different than is allowed within the RMF-12 district. It sets up its own space between building setbacks, and things of that, and development requirements of that nature. So that's why they're seeking the PUD classification, as opposed to simply going in and immediately developing the property as it is zoned. Given that fact, the petition is consistent with the Future Land Use Element. This zoning was approved -- actually, this property was down-zoned through the zoning re-evaluation program. And in the status that it is now at, it is, of course, vested for what its -- the zoning re-evaluation produced. Now the zoning re-evaluation ordinance dealt with process, it's important to appreciate, dealt with land that historically was zoned RMF-12, RMF-6 and C-3. The corridor was zoned commercial and under the zoning re-evaluation program, that was down-zoned to RMF-12 with a cap of 6. While not applicable, because~the land is zoned for six dwelling units per acre, we did do an evaluation for level of service C project, that this project will not exceed the 5 percent threshold tha~ triggers in a requirement through either phase development, to phase development so that road impacts are maintained, levels of services are consistent with the standards as provided for and the property can be served by sewer and water. Petitioner will be required to meet the open space and conservation elements of subsequent permitting procedures and processes. Therefore, we have concluded, the staff, that this petition, if approved, would be consistent with all elements of the Growth Management Plan. There is an issue, and I trust you've all noted that issue in the staff report, and we may as well talk about it, because I'm sure it's going to come up at some point in the game, and that is, how many dwelling units is this property entitled to based on its current zoning? In other words, are we adopting a PUD that, in fact, allows more density than they're currently allowed under the zoning that's in place. And that's a complicated matter, quite frankly, and administratively, our office has ruled that this petitioner is entitled to six dwelling units per acre over the gross acreage of the land that they own, which is 85.55 acres. Therefore, producing 531 dwelling units. However, we need to appreciate that that 85.55 acres in fact Page 47 !661 January 15, 1998 includes a waterway that is 10.79 acres in area by itself. That's the north-south wate~ay -- north-south waterway, which is platted and which is dedicated to the public. Nevertheless, the land beneath the submerged land, the fee to that is part of the lands, the uplands. So people own the land, even though there is a public wate~Nay over And we struggled with the issue of should density extend to that, and a~inistratively, we concluded that indeed they ought to. I don't think that is an argument as it applies to the platted rights of way. This is a platted piece of property. And since it has not been developed, obviously they have a right to vacate the plat. And inasmuch as they own the land on either side of the right-of-way, the land would automatically become theirs, and therefore, become now part of the gross acreage for which the zoning -- the zoning would extend. Remember, if you vacate a street and on both sides of it it's zoned for six dwelling units per acre, then that line really, in fact, runs to the center of the road under the Land Development Code. What appears to be a waterway in an east-west fashion here, an east-west fashion here, that's never been developed. There is no waterway there. And obviously, there shouldn't be any difficulty in the vacation process to return that land to it's parent parcel. And by that token, by that procedure, it would assume the density of the RMF-12, with a cap of six density. So we have various density scenarios that could come about here, and they are listed on page 3 of the staff report. However, as I would reiterate, it's staff's position that since they own fee to all of the land, to 85.55 acres, and that procedurally and over the years, density has always been granted on the gross density, that they were entitled to 531 dwelling units. However, if we look at this property as it stands today and acknowledge the waterways and the platted rights of way, you could not build 531 dwelling units on this property. ¥~R. OATES: Mr. Chairman, I have a question, i multiplied 85.5 zimes six and I get 513. NINO: i must be a ~errible mathematician, but ~hat number -- OATES: So did Mr. Pedone. NINO: Is ~hat right? 85.55? PEDONE: 85.55 times six units -- MR NINO: I'm sorry. MR PEDONE: It's 513.3. MR NINO: 85.55 times six. MR ARNOLD: 88.55. MR NINO: Is it 88? I'm sorry, the report is -- it's 88.55. MR OATES: Okay, well, that does make a difference, obviously. MR. NINO: So i wanted to sensitize you to that issue. The PUD that's before you, the PUD that you have, however, needs some wordsmithing. Let me go back to my report. Our position from staff's point of view is that -- and we've told you this many times. A PUD should not be used as a vehicle to stray significantly from the standard zoning Page 48 January 15, 1998 districts that we have in Collier County. A PUD should not be used to . give you license to build 20-story buildings, unless there are indeed unique and -- unique conditions. So therefore, our staff's position has always been that you ought to, your PUD should not exceed what you could normally get out of a conventional multi-family zoning district. Now, the RT Zoning District is a multi-family zoning district, and it allows the tallest buildings in Collier County. It has a cap of 10 stories. However, conditionally within the RT Zoning District, and when we deal with conditional uses, it basically says if the conditions are appropriate for granting the conditional use, you can go to 125 feet. So you could say that conventional zoning districts for multiple family housing in Collier County, the tallest building that is allowed, is 125 feet above the mean flood elevation. Staff is recommending that the petition should not be approved supporting their request for 15 stories above parking. So we do support a PUD which would have the tallest buildings being 125 feet above the mean flood elevation. Now those buildings, it's important to appreciate, are located on tracts R-1 through R-5, which are the tracts furthest removed from the intersection of Bluebell and Vanderbilt Drive. You'll note from the Master Plan that's provided on the wall, it's the land that lies west of the road, west and north of the road. So essentially, furthest, with the exception, obviously, of the tract that is on Bluebell, properties that are furthest removed from their impact on Bluebell and Vanderbilt Drive. And on Tract 6, the PUD establishes low rise multi-family structures not to exceed a height of 35 feet to 45 feet, respectively. Staff can support that height limitation on parcel R-6. However, on the parcels R-1 through R-5, our recommendation is that -- and the PUD document that's before you doesn't reflect this recommendation -- that you approve the PUD, but with a requirement that the maximum height of buildings not exceed 125 feet above the mean flood elevation. Not above parking, but above the mean flood elevation. And I'd be happy to answer any questions. MR. BRUET: I've got one for you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bruet? MR. BRUET: Yes. Ron, if the applicant is perhaps not successful in defending his position on submerged lands, and indeed, the State of Florida says they do have ownership -- I know there are a lot of grandfathering onerous process to go through -- but the State of Florida has been very successful in making their point. How would that loss of land affect the density if the PUD is approved, because this is a year, probably, plus away, before this could be determined. How would that affect the density? MR. NINO: Would you ask that question again, Mr. Bruet? I'm sorry. MR. BRUET: Gee, I did so good, too. (Laughter.) Page 49 January 15, 1998 MR. BRUET: If the applicant is not successful in proving their point on submerged lands, okay -- MR. NINO: Successful to whom? .MR. BRUET: To the State of Florida. I mean, they're going to have to deal with -- PLR. NINO: It's not the State of Florida that will make that decision. It's the Collier County Board of County Commissioners that will decide the rightness or the wrongness of extending the density consideration to the north-south right-of-way. MR. MULHERE: I think we might be able to clarify it. I'm not sure that there is any question but that they have title to the submerged land. You're supposing that there is a question. MR. BRUET: By ownership. MR. MVJLHERE: Correct. MR. BRUET: You mean by plat limit. MR. MULHERE: That's correct. MR. BRUET: Okay. :~R. :~JLHERE: And they have by easement granted --- MR. BRUET: Okay. MR. MULHERE: -- the right for the public to transverse in that waterway. MR. BRUET: So the board would still include it, regardless of what development entitlements they have on that land. MR. MULHERE: That's right. We have always calculated density on a gross density basis. MR. BRUET: -- regardless of -- MR. MULHERE: Gross acreage basis. MR. BRUET: -- regardless of jurisdiction and entitlements and the -like. MR. NINO: Mr. Chairman, let me come back again. There were letters received in opposition. Again, I received these letters after you received your staff report, so I will hand them out to you. MR. OATES: Can't delegate it to Bob. CHAIP34AN DAVIS: He's used that joke once. (Laughter.) MR. %~RAGE: I like a man who does his own work. CHAiKMAN DAVIS: Mr. Nino, let me get this straight now. So that your final recommendation to us is to recommend approval at 531 units. MR. NINO: Yes, 531 units, maximum 125 feet -- CF~IRMAN DAVIS: 125 feet. -- MR. NINO: -- 125 feet above the mean flood elevation on parcels R-i through R-5. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: R-1 through R-5 only? MR. NINO: Yes. MR. FRIDDY: And just as a follow-up to that, Mr. Chairman, they're asking for taller buildings, which staff is recommending shorter buildings. So density could still be achieved by making those shorter buildings fatter. MR. NINO: Yes. MR. PRIDDY: Okay. Paqe 50 January 15, 1998 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: It's a larger footprint. MR. PRIDDY: Oh. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Fatter, i don't know. MR. PRIDDY: You folks in the urban area have your terms, we in the rural area have ours. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: All right. The representative of the petitioner? MS. BISHOP: Good morning. My name is Karen Bishop. I represent the contract buyer, Signature Communities. At this time, we have no problem with the staff recommendation on the heights, and we are willing to bring our heights to 125 foot. We have worked very diligently with staff on the density issues and the alignment issues for these high rise tracts. I want to point out on the map over here that during the Environmental Advisory Board meeting that we attended, that the advisory board recommended that we be allowed -- in other words, they recommended that we move more into the wetlands to protect the site's scrub oaks in the front. So that the heights of the buildings were in an attempt to be able to protect more scrub oak, because that's something that's not seen and in this intersection there is a really nice dune area that we really would like to incorporate as our corner visual, corner monument, so to speak, as you would. But we are willing to bring it down to 125 feet. We believe we still can still achieve that. We will have to do substantial permitting with the agencies to allow us to get into more wetlands to protect more of the scrub area. But that is what we have in mind in general. So we have no problem with dropping it to 125. I believe we can stil-1 achieve all of those things. MR. PRIDDY: The other way to achieve that is to lower the density slightly? MS. BISHOP: I would say that that is not something that I would -- that we're going to do. The density needs to stay what it is because tkat's what the owners, you know, they're expecting that. That's the density they have. So what we're doing is trying to make the plan a better plan. The old five story plan would have obliterated everything on the site. So what we're trying to do is trying to keep the integrity of the site with some nice mangroves. You have some really infested mangroves -- not necessarily mangroves, but wetland areas -- that we want to get into to protect the scrub oak that are there; because you, in fact, could nuke all the scrub oak and still have 25 percent in your open space and meet your 25 percent vegetation, but yet not keep this really nice stuff. So we're trying to do a little of both here. Any questions? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any other questions? All right. Thank you. Additional speakers? Now's your chance. A lot of you have been sitting here patiently all morning, so -- MR. FINKBINER: Good morning, gentlemen. My name is Bill Page 51 16Gl January 15, 1998 Finkbiner. I'm president of the Gulf Breeze at Vanderbilt Beach Association, and I'd like to explain where this -- for your edification -- where this property and so forth is. If you're a boater at Vanderbilt Beach, you use this canal all the time going into Turkey Bay, which is today being dredged. The Gulf of Mexico is here, and the cemetery is here, and the Vanderbiit Motel is right here. Our condo, which consists of two 66-unit buildings, is about four years old. And there are other condos -- one gentleman had to leave this morning who was going to represent with the same feelings that we have -- is Surf Colony I, which are three bui%dings right in here. And if you remember, for years, there have been The Towers here. I speak for many of the people that I have polled in our association and we are 100 percent behind the proposal with one exception. There will probably wind up being parking area here of approximately 160 parking spaces. Across the street, which has been in contention for quite some time now, we hope to have a Dark through this whole area from Vanderbi!t Drive all the way doll to the canal. The roadway of Bluebill Avenue is loaded; sometimes impassable. The only problem we have is this roadway coming down, crossing this proposed what we feel is the proposed parking area, which we'll have to come and turn around and give some of the parking spaces away that we've negotiated for, and just overburden this road right here. I don't know what a probable solution is unless we could come back up this way. This would cause a chaotic thing. That's all I have to say if anybody has any questions. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any questions? Thank you, sir. MS. FITZGERALD: I'm Vera Fitzgerald, and I live not very far awa~ from this proposed development, and our concern is the traffic. 531 units will throw another 5310 vehicle trips a day on our little roads. Most of them, or many of them, cut through our community. As the streets get congested, they just cut right straight through Naples Park. And nobody ever stops to think what is the impact on the neighboring communities. And it's going to have quite an impac~ on our community. Fifteen stories has already been turned down just a little further up the road. I agree with the gentleman on ~he end, reducing the density would be a solution. Thank you. MS. BAKER: I'm Jenny Baker. I live at 15 Bluebill Avenue, which is right across from Don's, and I am on what is called the Baker-Carroll Point. We are adjacent to Vanderbilt Beach. I have a letter from somebody that couldn't stay. Do I read it to you? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: You can give it to the county attorney and we will all read it. MS. BAKER: Okay, that would be fine. Our concern is probably not only the density, but this access road that is to come out onto Bluebill. As you perhaps know, they are going to four-lane lllth Street, three or four-lane it, and that is mandated, and that will be happening within two years, as I understand it. Page 52 January 15, 1998 That will feed into Bluebill, and Bluebill is a two-lane road and will probably always be a two-lane road because there is a two-lane bridge. This is a problem. We are built-out. We have approximately 40 condominiums on Vanderbilt Beach. Vanderbilt Beach is two miles long. That translates into somewheres between 3500 and 3800 people that are there in season. Then we have Delnor-Wiggins Pass. And I don't know if any of you are beachgoers or ever go there on a hot day, not only, used to be only Sundays, now it is almost any day during season, because there are so many tourists here. We welcome the people going to Delnor-Wiggins, ~d we are inundated by traffic on those days, however we have learned to live with it. We are now going to, we understand, probably have a parking lot on the north side of Biuebill Avenue of approximately 160 cars. Those will also probably be filled on these days. We have made up our minds that we will accept that. To have an access road from this proposed addition going out through this proposed parking lot, 550 units -- and I understand it's to be fairly up-scale -- that should translate to something like 1100 people and possibly 1100 more cars coming out onto there. And the days that people will come out will certainly be the sunny days. We will then be inundated. We ask that there be only one access road and that be on Vanderbilt Drive. Vanderbilt Drive, as you know, is to be, sometime in the very foreseeable future, four-laned, and that is a major road and will accept this traffic. Thank you. ' CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Mr. Kant, if you could maybe comment on the access point while the next speaker is coming up. MR. KANT: Edward Kant, Transportation Services. Several statements that the previous speaker made require that they be addressed. One, it is true that the there are improvements to illth Avenue within the Five Year Plan. I can't immediately speak to the exact timing of them. The issue of four laning or three or two-lane boulevarding, or what have you, I don't know whether that's been set yet or not. I do not believe that there is any plan to four-lane Vanderbilt within the immediate Five Year Plan. It is in the Long Range Plan, however. One of the things that is interesting about this project, aside from the fact that the original plat had an access point onto Bluebill Avenue, this is about the second or third time I've seen a site plan similar to this. It's come in several times under several different proposed ownerships in the last year to 18 months. And from a transportation point of view, we don't have a problem. As a matter of fact, we would prefer to see more than a single access point to property of this size. And you've heard us in prior rezoning issues come up and make that point. I had a meeting with another engineer -- I don't remember -- Page 53 iiiiiii II IIIIII IIIIIIil11111 I II IIIIIII IIIII I I ii- I I January 15, 1998 this is what we were talking about, wasn't it, yesterday? A. Yes. MR. KANT: And something interesting, the most recent site plan that I've seen indicates that there would be a sales center type of a location on Vanderbilt at the point at which this access road reaches Vanderbilt. And in looking at it, one of the suggestions that I made -- and i believe that it's not an untenable suggestion, although I haven't discussed it in terms of the final site plan with the developer, but this is an issue that would come up during site planning -- would be that the Vanderbilt Drive access point would most likely be the major access point. If that's where they are locating their sales center if that's where they are planning to start their buildings, it ~ives them access to all of their product type. And we would foresee is the Bluebill Avenue access being more of a secondary access, more of a residents access. For example, if someone has a UPS delivery or your mother-in-law is coming to visit you, obviously, that has to come in in a gated or private community. That has to come in through some type of a security feature. And I don't see the development, at least none that I'm familiar with here in Collier County, aside from perhaps something like the Pelican Marsh development, where they would have more than one major access point that would be gated or manned, if you will -- correctly to say "personed". But the issue here is that our recommendation ultimately, regardless of the final densities or what have you from a transportation point of view, would be to have that main access come off of Vanderbilt with some kind of a card or gated access off Bluebill as a resident's convenience, both, either from going in or coming out. So we don't -- we are not real sure that we would support a single access for a development of this size in this type of a location. ! think we're real fortunate in looking at something like this. that we're not seeing a commercial component. For whatever that's worth. That, in itself, is going to change the character of the traffic. C?LAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. KANT: I don't know if that fully addresses some of the issues that have been brought up, but they may come up again, and I think it's important that you recognize we have been looking at this from that point of view. CHAIKMAN DAVIS: And I think, Mr. Kant, your comment that the prima~t entrance being on Vanderbilt and the other being on Bluebill being a secondary entrance, makes a whole lot of sense. MR. KANT: As I said, that's at this point an editorial comment because we haven't gotten into the site planning, we haven't discussed that with the petitioner. But I think that again, looking at the site plan and based on my experience with these types of developments, it appears that that may be what they're planning. We don't know. And at the zoning stage, that's a little premature. Page 54 , I I I iii II II I I I I IIIII II I I II III II IIIII I III I 16G1 January 15, 1998 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Sure. Of course. Yes, sir? MR. TREBILCOCK: Good morning. For the record, my name is Norman Trebilcock. I'm a transportation engineer with Wilson, Miller, and I'm speaking on behalf of the Vanderbilt Beach and Bay Association. I'm going to cover basically some transportation issues. Normally, I'm real supportive of these, the more accesses that Mr. Kant has spoken to. But there are some differences in this case that make it a little unique. For one thing, it isn't a commercial development; it is residential in nature. And when you look at the road intersections, Vanderbilt Drive is in the Financial.ly Feasible Plan to be a four-lane roadway, and Bluebill Avenue west of Vanderbilt Drive is to be a two-lane roadway in the future. It's going to remain as such. That being the case, it would make a lot of sense to me, from a traffic standpoint, that Vanderbilt Drive is going to better be able to handle any traffic increases, versus lllth. And in addition with ~hat parking developed on the south side, too, Vanderbilt Drive will better accommodate in the future, additional traffic. So from that standpoint, it would seem to make a lot of sense to have a singular access from that point of view. Being the case that two access points are developed, I would concur with Mr. Kant that in the event the two access points are developed, that there is some stipulation that the Bluebill Avenue access point shall be developed as a minor access point, primarily for residential and not commercial or delivery access. Very much similar to the Caloosa Bay Development, where their main access is on Goodlette-Frank and they have a minor access on Orange Blossom, and their minor access is an unmanned gated entry. So any deliveries or comr~ercial access would then use Goodlette-Frank to get into their site where their manned gate is. This site plan given as it is, you know, you could develop a major cut through access, and what you then create, as you do get congestion on the two-lane road, you start creating cut-through traffic through the residential area and create potential problems for the development, but also you create congestion at two little intersections, also. So the other point is, if the Bluebill Avenue access is developed, there should be a stipulation that it's coordinated with the proposed county parking area along Bluebill Avenue, that may require a joint access. Because you have a park project that's being developed and the existing plan shows the parking on the south side of Bluebill Avenue with two access points. There's been a proposal for a parking area on the north side of Bluebill Avenue with similar access points. But if these aren't coordinated together what we're going to create is a series of intersections with some traffic problems associated with them. So we feel that those stipulations are real important in approval of the plan. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. KANT: We take no exception. Pag9 55 January 15, 1998 MR. COX: My name's Don Cox, and I live in Vanderbilt Towers, Iii, and I feel that this is a very unique situation. I think the approach that the developer is taking is very good. However, any stipulation or anything that we can do to alleviate and make the traffic better, if it would be included, would be very welcome. When we say we have a traffic problem, what we have is this in season. We get to this point here, the traffic is backed up to the park, over the bridge into the park, and we literally cannot get to our homes. And we may be talking about 10, 15 or 20 minutes until we get there. Also, if we had a fire or other problems, you cannot get by. Now, these folks, who sound like fairly responsible developers to me, if they put this in here -- and I understand that it's only part of the thing -- but it is going to complicate this matter terrifically. And whatever can be done to make this better for the people who are here -- and as Jenny said, there are very, very many of us -- would be much appreciated. It is murder. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, sir. MR. PIRRO: Good morning, commissioners. My name is Ammon Pirro, and I live at Vanderbilt Landings, and I've been sworn in. p-i-r-r-o. The only objection that I've heard concerning the proposed roadway for the Wiggins Pass Landings development was dismay and outright disgust by many people that I talked to. It seems like our neighborhood, during the six months of the high season with its several thousand people living and moving about, are aware of the heavy traffic that now exists on a narrow road like Bluebill. People in our area oppose the idea of a roadway ccnnecting this new development to Bluebill Avenue, for the obvious reasons given by most of the people speaking in front of me. Commissioners, as you know, the county is in dire need of beach parking. There's been a lot of conversation, a lot of things written about how this was ignored for many years. Here, we have an opportunity for the county to put in more beach parking that is dire need by the people, citizens of our county. According to the Master Plan that we see here to my left, they label that as, the channel as manmade. Most of the people that I talk to who've lived here for many years say that is a natural waterway. The only manmade part of it, is the seawall on the west side of the channel. I have always believed that the water was controlled by the state, the submerged land was controlled by the state, and no one could actually own it. Now I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know the technical aspects of the law concerning that. However, I had one occasion where I have a dock, and because I did not own the upland rights, I could not acquire a lease for the dock. I had to work with the people who owned the land just above the dock area, in order to sublease through them, in order to get my dock Page 56 January 15, 1998 into position. I was told at the time that all this land, submerged land, is controlled by the Division of Natural Resources, the State Division of Natural Resources. So if this land here then belongs to the state, I can't see it being used as part of the square footage you utilize to determine the density of buildings being constructed in the new development. We are concerned citizens trying to do our civic service before harm is done to our neighborhood and to its environment. We strongly recommend that the commission reject the rezone request for these reasons. Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Yes, ma'am? MS. MOORE: I'd like to be sworn in. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: If you would raise your right hand, the court reporter will swear you in. (The speaker was sworn.) MS. MOORE: My name is Dean Moore. My husband and I live at North Shore Lake Villas on Vanderbilt Drive directly across from the proposed project. we've heard a lot of comments about the traffic on Bluebill. However, I would like everyone to know that we do have a lot of traffic problems there on Vanderbilt Drive, also. I have seen -- there is a four-way stop sign there at lllth-Bluebill-Vanderbilt Drive -- and I have seen the traffic lined up this time of year back to our area. And that is quite a way from that stop light or stop sign; four-way stop sign. The proposed entryway would come out on Vanderbilt Drive there between Roma Court and the entrance to our area, North Shore Lake Villas. If you want to make a left-hand turn, a lot of days you have to wait for quite some time before being able to get out onto Vanderbilt Drive. It's just incomprehensible to me that Vanderbilt Drive could be left as a two-lane road, and then put a project of this size there, funneling all of that traffic out onto there. And I really think that there needs to be some sort of traffic study or something done, and maybe some road improvements before, you know, a project of this size is considered. I have no objections to the development or to a nice something, whatever, going in there. But I do like to leave my area occasionally and I would like that taken into consideration. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Additional speakers? MR. HARLAN: My name is Dean Harlan, and I've been sworn in. I live in a condo on Carroll-Baker Point. There are 10 condos on that point, about 600 and 30 some plus units on that point. There is one entrance and one exit that all of us use to get into that area, Carroll-baker Point. It seems to me reasonable that we can consider one exit for 531 units and the exit could be on Vanderbilt Drive. There is an example Page 57 !6G1 January I5, 1998 of what it takes to get in and out of there by taking a look at our own Carroll-Baker Point. Rather than be redundant, traffic seems to be the total issue here. Nobody is really greatly complaining about the size of the units, the density units. Please, if you are coming to our area, do not come there on a sunny day when you want to go into Wiggins park. You will not be able to come down Bluebill Avenue in the traffic that is blocked in faster than 15 to a half an hour. That's how crowded it is during what the park says is about 30 days, when the park is closed, and they have to reroute people all around that area. And the traffic still stops there at Bluebill and Gulf because people want to get into the park, in case there's a vacancy. Thank you. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Thank you. Additional speakers? All right. I think if you could come back up as the petitioner's representative, I think someone had a question for you, I believe. MR. BRUET: i have a quick one. Your little loop road there, will that be gated or will each parcel be gated? MS. BISHOP: No. We'll have an overall gated community to the project, each parcel internal. They may put some internal, but it's kind of redundant to a gated community. MR. BRUET: So, the cut-through issue that they brought up, is really not an issue -- MS. BISHOP: No. MR. BRUET: -- you will not be able to cut through? MS. BISHOP: No, sir, you will not be able to cut through. And furthermore, we are very aware of the issues of traffic in this area and,' you know, we are currently working with the county Parks Department with that design of the parking lot on that roadway, to make sure that our access and that parking lot are congruent to each other. We have no problem with it being a secondary entrance, and that. Frankly I think that the homeowners that live there are going to make that choice on their own, for the same reasons that people have discussed. Why would they choose to go that way if there is a problem getting out? They would, in fact, go to the access which would be more accessible ~o them. I see this problem of traffic on almost every two-lane road this time of year. I had the misfortune of picking Logan Boulevard to avoid a traffic problem at Airport and Pine Ridge, and it took me 20 minutes to go a thousand feet. It was school traffic, but still. So I see this over and over. The things that we're trying to do is work well with our neighbors. We want to be a good neighbor. So we are in process of making their issues a part of our plan for the future. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. MULHERE: Mr. Chairman, I just wanted to add, in speaking with Mr. Kant, when the improvements are completed along Vanderbilt, as I suspected, and maybe Mr. Kant, if I misspeak, you can correct me, Page 58 January 15, 1998 the Bluebill will have to match Vanderbilt and will likely -- that will occur likely -- will we make some improvements going down Bluebill Avenue when that occurs? MR. KANT: I believe you're referring to lllth, as opposed to Vanderbilt. MR. MULHERE: That's correct, Illth. Yes, thank you. MR. KANT: That's the only thing you misspoke to. MR. MULHERE: Yes. MR. KANT: Yes, what Mr. Mulhere is saying in principle is correct. That any improvements that will be made to lllth, again, regardless of what that final section might look like, we would car~-y that through the intersection to the west. And assuming that it is somewhat better than a two-lane road, although there is a question as to whether that should be three lanes or four lanes, or whether it should have a median, or what have you, that would be carried through the intersection. It would take, depending on the eastbound left turn and right turn queues that is that coming from the park heading east, in my opinion would take several hundred feet to accommodate that. Then there's the issue of getting back down to the two-lane section before the bridge. The reason I'm emphasizing before the bridge, is because there is no proposal that I'm aware of, neither presently or in the Long Range Plan, for Bluebill to be anything other than a two-lane roadway. So that will take another couple hundred feet. So we're looking at somewhere between six, seven, eight hundred feet from the intersection to back where the two-lane section is. And I think that that will probably account for or encompass the area where their access point comes down to. As I said, in my discussions, I had a brief discussion with Mr. Trebilcock, and we looked at where would that be. From the parking point of view, it's very flexible. From the developer's point of view, obviously, he's got some environmental issues and some land planning issues, so he may not be quite as flexible. But we found again, in working with the development community, there's always a little bit of wiggle room there, to try to get stuff to line up so that it works. The issue again being people are not going to either patronize or buy into something that doesn't work. MR. MULHERE: Just that that would afford some improvement to that area, that maybe wasn't anticipated or wasn't discussed. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Very good point. And the developer's representative, as I understand it, made the commitment on the record that working with the county parks and parking facility is certainly do-able, and that that entrance is going to be a secondary entrance. I think it just makes good sense that your major entrance is on the other street. All right. Any additional questions? I'll close the public hearing. MR. PRIDDY: I would move that we recommend for approval Petition PUD-97-18. Page 59 January 15, 1998 MR. BRUET: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That's with the staff recommendation of 531 units? MR. PRIDDY: With that staff recommendation of 531 units and the CHAIRMAN DAVIS: 125 feet above mean flood elevation? MR. PRIDDY: -- with the, yes, 125 feet. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: On parcels R-1 through R-5. MR. PRIDDY: And the lower on R-6. MR. BRUET: Still a second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion by Mr. Priddy, seconded -- MR. PRIDDY: And that the second entrance be a secondary entrance. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion by Mr. Priddy, seconded by Mr. Bruet, with those stipulations. Discussion? All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That carries unanimously. And with that, -- MR. PRIDDY: I have one question for Bob. Bob, where are we in getting our ninth planning commissioner? MR. MULHERE: I have on my desk several -- I'm not sure how many; I think two or three -- letters of request to be appointed. And I need to prepare a response for Ms. Filson, which I'll do probably before Monday. Although traditionally, the planning commission does make a recommendation, and I don't even forward those to you. -MR. PRIDDY: I'll find out the real answer at lunch in a few months. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And with that, we are adjourned. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:32 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MICHAEL A. DAVIS, Chairman TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COU!XT REPORTING BY: Kaye Gray, RPR Page 60 16Gl ('ounty (;overJlment Ih'o(luctivity Committee Meeting Minutes .hmu,ry 21. Iq98.9:35 A.M. ~ ! cmhcrs I'rcsc n I A bsen t .lack McKcnrm x John Norris x M ario l)clgado x Edward Fcrguson x Charles (Joliet x Robert l.aird x Bill Ncal x Edward Oil x Karl Otto x John Schocmcr x John Stockton x Bernard Weiss x William Ehl,cn x starf Gary Vincent x I isc. Con'es: C, uests Date: Copies To: .lack McKcrma opened the meeting at 9:35 A.M. and changed thc agenda to discuss New Business as thc first item. New lh]siness F, lection of New Chaimmn - Bob Laird nominated Bill Neal for Chaimmn and Karl Otto for Vice-Chaimmn. Both were clcctcd 7 - 0. Bill Ehbcn abstained. Filling Vacancies - The committee decided to reappoint Ed Ferguson, Bob I.aird and John Stockton to thc selection subcommittee. Gary Vincent provided thc subcommittee with thc resumes of seven applicants lbr thc six vacant positions on thc committee. (Ed Ferguson will receive thc resumes upon his return.) Jack staled that Bernard Weiss had inlcndcd to request reappointmcnt to thc committee but was out oflowil. Itc said that Bernie had contacted Sue Filson and Commissioner Berry and that they told him he would be included among thc applicants. GaD' stated that he would coordinate that with Sue. Gary requested that the committee provide him xvith their recommendations by FcbruatT 4, i 998. New Member Introduction - Jack introduced and xvelcomed Bill Ebben to the Productivity Committee. Bill provided a brief description of his background and prol~ssional wo~ experience. ~rrts ........ F~~' ~O~S~On'~ i n~._. V · -1661 i'resenlalion of i',-oposcd I'erl'ormance Al)prais:fl Form Michclle Arnold, Assislanl Io Ibc ('OIIIlly Administrator, provided Ibc committee with cop]cs of ~l~c proposed new pcrl~rmancc al~praisal I~I'11~ and described hoxv il would be used. Karl noted Ihat thc appraisal was a lop-down evaluation and suggcslcd lhat boltom-t~p and peer evaluations be it~corporalcd as well. g,lario I)clgado suggcslcd that thc ('Otlllly incorpor;dc appeal process in thc pcrlk~rmancc evaluation syslcm. Bill Ebben agreed with Karl and Nlario. and suggested Ihal all evaluations be done al thc end of thc year wilh merit i~crcascs upoll thc cvaltmlion score. Bill also suggested Ih;il Ibc form be: printed on dislinclivclv paper, hole ptlllchctl, tmmbcrcd ;lilt] d;lled. Michellc stated Ihat she would discuss thc committee's suggcstim~s al thc l)ivision Staff mcclillg o~1 ]:riday. Subcommiltee Ilpdales Jail Study - Karl Olio expressed concern that an architect had been hired lo produce pi;ms Ibc Immokalcc Jail expansion without having done a feasibility study. Karl staled that I;c wot, id follow up wilh Adolfi) ;md will Iv.. l,.,,.,,i,lil,:.,. ;~ 15~;~1 l,:i)~11 Io IbC: Shcri fCs Ovcflimc - The subcomn~illce has a meeting with C~stal Kinzcl Ibc sCColld wcck of February Io finalize the subcommitlec's rcpo~. Thc filial rcpo~ is expected Iobc complclcd by thc c~d of FcbruaFy. Human Resource Follow-up - Ed Fcrguson was nol present. Thc I tR subcommitlcc status was poslponcd Io Iht ncxl rattling. Vcrhatim Record in~s o f BCC Meetings - John Slockton will research the reasons For using a court reporter and Ibc cost Inlcr-Cotmtv Information I)atabase - John Stockton will gather more information. Old Business Follow-tip with I~t~rchasing I)Cl~arlmcnt - No new stalus, l~crnard Weiss nol present. Follow-up with HR, vohmlccr fi~r new subcommillee chaimmn - Jack stated fi~al Ed requested to be replaced as Iht subcommillcc chairman because his cmxcnt workload prcvcnlcd him fi'om devoting stuffit]tnt time to the I IR subcommiltcc. Thc election ora new subcommittee chairman was postponed lo lhe next mecti~g. Clerks PROJt~('T 2000 - Software - Jim Mitchell, lhc Finance Director, was scheduled Io make a presentation concerning Ibc imrchasc of new software cosling over S2 million. Itc was tmablc to attend thc meeting duc to a thmily emergency. He is expected to make thc prcscnlation at thc ncxl meeting. Meeting adjourned ! 1:40 a.m. The next meeting will be Wednesday February 18Ih, at 9:30 a.m. in the County Administrator's Conference Room. cc. l?.oard of(?oumy Conlmissioners ()l/ice Robert l'~crnamlcz, ('ounlv Administrator 16G1 MEMORANDUM Date: February 12, 1998 To: Board of County Commissioners From: Bob Fernandez, County Administrator Re: EDC Quarterly Economic Diversification and Business Assistance Report In compliance with the Economic Development Council's contract with Collier County, attached please find a copy of the Quarterly Economic Diversification and Business Assi-~tance Report. This report is being provided for your information. RFF/BP Attachment ~/sc. Corrfs: Ooto.: ~ ¢o~ies 1'o: III II IIIIIIIIIII I IIII II IIIIII IIIIII IIIIII IIIII lU IIII II I "'"" "'"' '" i · ' i661 ' NAPLES, FLORIDA' THE QUALITY OF LIFE IS WORKING · Collier County Economic Diversification and Business Assistance Quarterly Report October 1, 1997- December 31, 1997 Fiscal Year 97/98 · ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND& GOLDEN GATE FLORIDA Economic Dcvclopmcm Comlcil of Collier Coulll.~ · 31)51) Norlh l lorscshoc Drive. Suite 120 · Naples. Florida 3411)4 · Phone (941) 263-1~9~9 · Fax 1941 ) 263-(,o21 · htlp:/ls~ floridabusincss.com 16~1 Economic Diversification Table of Contents Page I. Executive Summary ................................................................................... 1 II. Organizational Chart .................................................................................. 3 IlL Job Descriptions ........................................................................................ 5 IV. Business Retention, Expansion & Recruitment Collateral Materials .... 24 V. Fiscal Report .............................................................................................. 25 VI. Program Overview ..................................................................................... 30 VlL Businesses Assisted: October 1, 1997- December 31, 1997 ................ 32 ADDENDUM A. Economic Multiplier ........................................................................................ 38 B. Letters of Acknowledgement ......................................................................... 40 C. Capital Formation ............................................................................................ 47 ~ ,~ , ~ II I I II I I II I III IIIIII I ..... I I I I IIIII I ~<~3,d~, ~',--o~ .;...r,.~ :.:-:.,. :.'r -. ,..... . ... !: i~.Pas~C~ 3050 North Horseshoe Dr,ye, Su,te 120 J~n M A,~-~ ~L~ NapJes. Flor,~a 34104, USA &l~,~t~ Fax ~41.263.6021 ~[1~ Inlernef swflondabbsmess corn Ec~,~ ~lo~t C~,I ~" ~'~ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ~*~*'~ OF CO~iER COUN~ C~l.en P~..~., ~ ao Fi~T Q~RTER ~'~" ~"~ ~ ~ ~'"'~" ECONOMIC D~E~IFICATION PROG~ wJ~. ~,,~, ~.~. ~ ~ EXECUT~E SUM~RY T~..,, ...... ~uncil of ~lller ~unty (EDC) and the ~lller ~unty Board of ~,~,,~ ~,",~.,~' ~unty ~mmissloner~ began the lmplemen~tlon of a public/private E~, ..... ~.o,., partnership for economic diversification through the retention. ~.~ ~,. expansion and creation of high wage Jobs. v ...... ~-~,~ The EDC moved Into new offices located at 3050 North c~,,~,,,~o ~.,.~ ~-~ Hors~hoe Drive. Suite 120 in the Collier Park of ~mmerce on ~c~,.. September g9. 1997. With triple the amount of space of the previous ~,~.~d .... offlce~, the EDC ha~ ample room to accommodate the growing ~ff ~ .... and resource~ now available. The new location was chosen ~. v~. ~..~.., specifically for i~' close proximity to the permitting, zoning, site plan review, occupational licensing, and many other departmen~ that are .... ~.-, part of ~liler ~unty Development Se~lces: which enabie~ the EDC to :~'~'~ ~ ~ better re~pond and assist companle~ expand and start-up in Collier .... ~, ~ ceo ~unty. ~.:~., ~,~,~°~., The attached first quarter report documen~ economic activity ~c,,~,~,.s ..... ,~, October 1. 1997 through December 31. 1997. To quali~ for inclu~lon In ,~ ~ the report, businesses must provide Jobs that are I 15% of the ~lller ,,~,~,~.~..,,c~.,~ ~unty Average Annual Wage and must have opened their local ~.~ s ..... ~,~ facility during the noted timeframe. 16G! Additional Information contained in the document Includes an overview of the EDC organization with Job descriptions for those positions that receive public sector matching funds. A direct economic impact calculation is also Included for wages paid over one year. Aisc, a total capital investment calculation has been provided: which Includes new purchases of land. buildings. machinery and renovation costs and are directly attributable to high wage job retention, expansion and recruitment efforts.. A completed copy of the business retention, expansion and recruitmei, t collateral materials is also Included for your review. The completed set includes the: Demographic Profile and Demographics on Disk, Business Assistance Guide. Financial Reference Guide. Industrial Park Guide and a Workforce Development and Education Resource Guide. Following the report is an addendum that contains an economic impact multiplier calculation, by specific Industry, which provides data for the total economic Impact of the high wage job retention and creation. In addition. letters of acknowledgment from participating high wage businesses have been provided for your review. Finally. included in the report is a copy of the MfcroEnterprlse Loan application as submitted by the Collier County Banking Partnership. in conjunction with the Economic Developmen't CounciI of Collier County. In an effort to provide capital for businesses in the range of $500 - $ I 0.000. the Banking Partnership and the EDC proposed a Collier County Micro£oan Program and received approval of $25.000 for startup operations, in addition, the EDC will be working with the local banking industry to increase the availability of funds for the Ioan pool. Submitted By: Richard A. Botthof, Chairman Economic Development Council of Collier County John Passidomo, Immediate Past Chairman Economic Development Council of Collier County Susan Pareigls, Executive Director Economic Development Council of Collier County · 16G1 Organizational Chart October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND & GOLDEN GATE FLORIDA · Page 3 of 59 · Page 4 of 59 · 16G1 Job Descriptions October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND & GOLDEN GATE FLORIDA · Page 5 o1'59 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Position Purpose: This position is responsible, professional work involved in the directing of the Economic Development Council of Collier County which is responsible for the planning, promoting and implementing of the economic diversification program for Collier County to retain, expand, and recruit high wage jobs and business interests for Collier County; in conjunctio~ with the EDC Board of Directors and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Major responsibilities include administrative, technical and strategic support for the Economic Development Council of Collier County and the EDC / Collier County - Public Private Partnership for Econontic Prosperity. In addition, major responsibilities include marketing tasks for the Industrial Development Authority of Collier County. Oversees economic and business research, eristing industry retention and expansion assistance, ombudsman assistance to area businesses, new business and industry recruitment, international business and trade development, minority business development, film, television and print advertising industry attraction. Acts as Collier County Economic Liaison to local, state and federal agencies; in conjunction with the EDC Board of Directors and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Work is performed with considerable independence, but is re,dewed by the EDC Chairman of the Board for program effectiveness and conformance with policies. Duties and Responsibilities: Administers the EDC / Collier County Board of County Commissioners Economic Diversification Program for initiating and planning economic and community development programs designed to diversify the local economic base and to improve the overall quality of life in Collier County; plans and coordinates the activities of business and industry development. Page 6 of 59 IIII I I IIIII IIII I IIIIIIII r---- ...... I 16Gl Duties and Responsibilities: (continued) Oversees private sector fundraising for economic diversification and retention, recruitment division(s)activities and expenditures. Plans, directs and coordinates through subordinate personnel thc operations of various economic development programs; organizes thc administrative programs within each of the divisions. Serves as the initial point of contact to facilitate Collier County's Ombudsman function: in order to provide regulatory assistance to existing and new high wage business and industry. Directs the initiation of primary research and the assembly and · dissemination of secondary data in the domestic and international markets in order to assist in the planning of programs for existing business retention and expansion and new business recruitment. Snpe~ndses a staffof planning professionals, technical assistants and other clerical and administrative personnel, assigns projects, implements employee training programs, evaluates work performance and resolves disciplinary matters when necessary. Prepares and presents projects to the EDC Board of Directors and subsequently to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Directs the preparation of collateral materials, reports, special analyses, and other materials to inform existing industry and new business prospects about business assistance services available in Collier County. Serves as the EDC/ColHer County Economic Liaison with Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council - Economic Development Committee; Florida Economic Development Council; Enterprise Florida, Inc.; the U.S. Department of Commerce and other economic development organizations. Performs other duties as assigned. Decisions Made: · Incumbent exercises judgment with respect to business and industry relocation and startup activities. Evaluates potential retention, expansion and recruitment prospects. Final approval of budget requests are determined by the EDC Board of Directors and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Contact With Others: Incumbent has extensive contact with CEO's, small business owners, state, city and county officials, Collier County residents and the general pubHc. · Page 7 of 50 IIIIIII III I IIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIII I II II I IIIIIII ,~ ............ I Required Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Extensive knowledge of the general business principles and practices applied in the organization and management of high wage enterprises. Considerable knowledge of the principles and practices applied in related activities such as basic resources planning; city/county comprehensive land use plan. Superior skills in the oral and written presentation of factual information. Ability to plan and direct the work of a professional, technical staff. · Ability to meet with individuals from a variety of socio-econom.~.c backgrounds and to effectively present helpful economic diversification resources and programs. Ability to establish and maintain public confidence and interest in programs of economic diversification through high wage job retention, expansion and creation. Minimum Qualifications: Any combination of training and experience equivalent to: Graduation from a four-year college or university with major course work in business administration, economics, planning or a related field. Fours years of responsible professional experience in economic development, business administration, public administration, planning, tourism or a related field including four years in an administrative or supervisory capacity. Essential Physical Requirements: · None. Necessary Special Requirements: Possession of a valid Florida driver's license. *Above Job Description May Not Include Ali Duties Performed Revised: 10/1/97 · Page 8 of 50 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY BUSINESS RECRUITMENT MANAGER Position Purpose: This position is responsible, professional work involved in the · recruitment of high wage, business interests to Collier County. Employees in this class are responsible for pursuing domestic and international investment opportunities, providing assistance to new high wage industry for the relocation, startup, permitting and regulatory processes. Work is reviewed periodically through conferences and reports, observation and assessment by the Executive Director of the Economic Development Council of Collier County. Duties and Responsibilities: Provides assistance to business prospect~ for high wage, business relocation and stamp including industrial revenue bonding. Provides review and follow-up communicalJon to potential high wage business relocation prospects contained in an EDC office database. Develops business prospect inquiries generated from the Economic Development Council of Collier County's marketing and adverff, sing programs. Conducts prospect tours, assists with site selection and provides a · general overview of Collier County as a place to Hve, work and do business. Assists in the development of information on major industrial site selection factors, such as economic analysis, population demographics and labor market characteristics. Reviews and updates targeted business commerce/industrial parks collateral materials. Provides assistance with technical data requests in the areas of planning, zoning and development review processing. Serves as ombudsman to assist business relocations and startups through the permitting and regulatory process. · Pn~e 9 of 59 Duties and Responsibilities: (continued) Maintains records of time spent on the job, material and data used. completen monthly progress and status reports, Assists international businesses in pursuing domestic, international trade and reverse investment for relocations and startup of new, high wage businesses. Establishes a structured schedule of international tradeshows, a nd trade missions to/from Collier County; with Enterprise Florida and the U.S. Department of Commerce. Conducts international trade missions with public and private sector business leaders from Collier County to targeted countries; with reverse missions to Collier County. This function is performed in coordination with the Business Retention and Expansion Manager. Performs related duties as assigned. Decisions Made: Incumbents exercise judgment with respect to business and ~ndustry relocation and startup activities. Decisions relating to policies and procedures, or interpretations of complex regulations are referred to the Executive Director of the Economic Development Council of Collier County. Contact With: Incumbents have extensive contact with industry and business · leaders, prospects, professional groups, clients, public interest groups, funding agencies, public and private economic development agencies and government departments with Collier County and the State of Florida. Required Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Knowledge of the principles and practices of economic development including the various areas of concentration related to planning such as comprehensive planning, land development regulations, data system and research, transportation and economic development such as f~nance, economics, accounting, real estate, loan packaging and economic forecasting. · Page Required Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: (continued) Knowledge of the principles, practices and techniques of public or business administration. Knowledge of financial incentive Programs and loan packaging. Ability to communicate effectively in graphic, written and oral form. Ability to utilize planning, accounting and personnel principles and procedures in completing assignments. Ability to provide training, supervision and technical information to other employees, and establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees, officials and the general public. Ability to prepare project budgets and prepare operational an~ · statistical tabulations, reports and projections. Minimum Qualifications Any combination of training and experience equivalent to: Graduation from a four year college or university with a bachelor'.~ degree in business or public administration, economics or a closely related field. Two years of experience in economic development, business management, planning or a related field. Essential Physical Requirements: None. · Necessary Special Requirements: Possession of a valid Florida driver's license. *Above ]ob Description May Not Include All Duties Performed Established: 10/1/97 · Page l I of 59 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY BUSINESS RESEARCH MANAGER Position Purpose: This position is responsible, professional work involved in · developing, analyzing, implementing and maintaining County-wide economic development research initiatives for the retention, expan,~ion and recruitment of high wage, business interests for Collier County. Work includes technical research in several areas of economic and community development. The incumbent gathers appropriate documentation and research materials pertaining to demographics, economic base industries, office and industrial site location and other important economic information. The incumbent exercises independent judgment and initiative. Work is evaluated through conferences, reports, observation anti assessment by the Executive Director of the Economic Development Council of Collier County. Duties and Responsibilities: Assists in the fundamental tasks of design and implementation of data collection systems; including, but not limited, to the Geographic Information System (G.I.S.); compiles and analyzes economic and commuuity development documents and publications; assists in the public presentation and/or dissemination of economic development materials · and information. Confers with local authorities, civic leaders, economic development entities and specialists to devise and recommend research initiatives for economic development. Studies operations of other economic development organizations; notes trends and needs, and evaluates efficiency of economic development programs; and consults with and advises economic development professionals concerning needed improvements in research efforts. Gathers economic development information for reports for various meetings such as the Board of County Commissioners' meetings or the EDC Committee meetings and its task forces. Plans, develops and coordinates with Collier County staff regarding economic elements relating to the Comprehensive Landnse Plan. · Page 12 of 59 Duties and Responsibilities: (continued) Maintains records of time spent on the job, material and data used, completes monthly progress and status ,reports. Participates in field surveys to secure a variety of economic development data such as existing industry conditions, regulatory climate. relocation factors, availability of existing industrial land and facilities, etc. Participates in projects through interviews and research; tabulates and compiles pertinent data to Collier County economic development. t~k~;SiSts in conducting the Business Outreach Survey to Collier County · businesses to determine desired services and areas of need for the retention and expansion of firms in the market. This function is performed in conjunction with the Business Retention and Expansion Manager. Researches the availability of capital for small and medium sized businesses. Reviews and updates targeted business assistance and financial assistance, workforce development and education collateral materials in conjunction with the Business Retention and Expansion Manager. Serves as ombudsman to assist and facilitate the relocation, startt~p and expansion of existing and new businesses through the permitting and regulatory review process. Assists the International Business in pursuing domestic, international trade and reverse investment for expansion of local businesses and recruitment of new businesses. Conducts international trade mi.~sion/trade show research. This function is performed in coordination with the Business Recruitment Manager and the Business Retention and Expansion Manager. Performs related duties as assigned. Decisions Made: · Incumbents exercise judgment with respect to business and industry retention, expansion, relocation, and startup activities. Decisions relating to policies and procedures, or interpl'etations of complex regulations are referred to the Executive Director of the Economic Development Council of Collier County. Contact With: Incumbents have extensive contact with industry and business leaders, prospects, professional groups, clients, public interest groups, funding agencies, public and private economic development agencies and government departments with Collier Count y and the State of Florida. · Page 13 o~ 59 ltcquircd Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Knowledge of standard statistical and mathematical methods and principles. Knowledge of basic planning principles and practices as related to economic development. Knowledge of regulations governing development. Knowledge of research and surveY techniques. Ability to review and analyze technical reports and papers for completeness and accuracy. Ability to isolate and analyze significant trends and practices froth · detailed records and materials. Ability to organize and efficiently present written and verbal reports. Ability to perform comparative analysis of economic development performance data. Abilily to analyze facts and to exercise sound judgment in written form. Ability to express ideas clearly and concisely, orally and in written form. Ability to establish and maintain professional working relationships with Collier County departments and agencies, officials, working associates and the general pubic. Ability to utili~.e planning, accounting and personnel principles and procedures in completing assignments. Ability to provide training, supervision and technical information to other employees, and establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees, officials and the general public. Ability to prepare project budgets and prepare operational and statistical tabulations, reports and projections. · Minimum Qualifications Any combination of training and experience equivalent to: Graduation from a four year college or university with a bachelor's degree in business or public administration, economics, or a closely related field. Two years of experience in economic development, business management, planning or a related field. · Page 14 or5t) Essential Physical Requirements: None. Necessary Special Requirements: · Possession of a valid Florida driver's Hcense. *Above Job Description May Not Include All Duties Performed Established: 10/1/97 · Page 15 of 59 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY BUSINESS RETENTION AND EXPANSION MANAGER Position Purpose: This position is responsible, professional work involved in the · retention and expansion of high wage, business interests in Collier County. Employees in this class are responsible for pursuing domestic and international investment opportunities, providing assistance to existing industry in the relocation, expansion, permitting and regulatory processes. Work ~s reviewed periodically through conferences and reports, observation and assessment by the Executive Director fo the Economic Development Council of Collier County. Duties and Responsibilities: Provides assistance to business prospects for business retention and expansion including industrial revenue bonding. Conducts Business Outreach Survey to Collier County businesses to determine desired services and areas of need for the retention and expansion of firms in the market. Establishes and oversees Business Visitation Program to enhance community mentoring and problem solving. Facilitates the coordination of support service providers. Increases the frequency and broadens the base of attendance of · business forum programs. Researches the availability of capital for small and medium sized businesses. Facilitates the creation of innovative finance programs from public and private sectors. Reviews and updates targeted business assistance and financial assistance, workforce development and education collateral materials. Serves as ombudsman to assist and facilitate the expansion of existing businesses through the permitting and regulatory review process. Assists the international business in pursuing domestic, international trade and reverse investment for expansion of local businesses. pa~¢ 16 of 5'~ ~ ...... ~ ~ i IIIII I IIIIIIIII IIIII ............. I .... l~l~ ................ I I - I II II 16Gl Duties and Responsibilities: (continued) Maintains records of time spent on the job, material and data used, completes monthly progress and status reports. Establishes a structured schedule of international counseling in Collier County, with F-nterprise Florida and the U.S. Department of Commerce. Submits international grant funding requests for trade missions, trade shows and educational woric~hops. Updates local public and private sector business leaders on pending international grant funding submissions to the State. Conducts international trade missions with public and private. ~ector · business leaders from Collier County to targeted countries; with reverse missions to Collier County. This function is performed in coordination with the Business Development Manager. Coordinates participation of Collier County businesses in international trade shows. Performs related duties as assigned. Decisions Made: Incumbents exercise judgment with respect to business and industry retention and expansion activities. Decisions relating to policies and procedures, or interpretations of complex regulations are referred to the Executive Director of the Economic Development Council of Collier County. Contact With: Incumbents have extensive contact with industry and business leaders, prospects, professional groups, clients, public interest groups, · funding agencies, public and private economic development agencies and government departments with Collier County and the State of Florida. Required Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Knowledge of the principles and practices of economic development including the various areas of concentration related to planning such as comprehensive planning, land development regulations, data system and research, transportation and economic development such as finance, economics, accounting, real estate, loan packaging and economic forecasting. Knowledge of the principles, practices and techniques of public or business administration. · Page 17of59 16Gl Required Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: (continue:d) Knowledge of financial incentive programs and loan packaging. Ability to communicate effectively in graphic, written and oral form. Ability to utili,_e planning, accounting and personnel principles and procedures in completinll assignments. Ability to provide training, supervision and technical information to other employees, and establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees, officials and the general public. Ability to prepare project budgets and prepare operational and statistical tabulations, reports and projections. · Minimum Qualifications Any combination of training and experience equivalent to: Graduation from a four year college or university with a bachelor's degree in business or public administration, economics, or a closely related field. Two years of experience in economic development, business management, planning or a related field. Essential Physical Requirements: Noue. Necessary Special Requirements: Possession of a valid Florida driver's license. *Above Job Description May Not Include AH Duties Performed Established: 10/1/97 Page 18 of 59 16Gl ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AND TRUSTEE MEMBERSHIP RETENTION, RECRUITMENT MANAGER Position Purpose: This position is responsible, professional work involved in the administration of the Economic Development Council of Collier Count' which is responsible for the planning, promoting and implementing of the economic diversification program for Collier County to retain, expand, and recruit high wage jobs and business interests for Collier County. Major responsibilities include administrative and technical support for the Economic Development Council of Collier County and lhe Executive Director of the EDC. In addition, responsibilities include administration tasks for the Industrial Development Authority of Collier County.. Oversees the EDC Board of Directors correspondence, bookkeeping, purchasing/inventory control and Trustee retention and recruitment. Work is reviewed periodically through conferences and reports, observation and assessment by the Executive Director of the Economic Development Council of Collier County. Duties and Responsibilities: Performs administrative tasks for the Executive Director o1' the Economic Development Council of Collier Con n ty. Performs EDC, Collier County Public/Private Partnership, and IDA bookkeeping, payroll and administrative tasks. · Provides primary administrative assistance to the EDC Board of Directors for correspondence, meetings and notices. Serves as primary coordinator for EDC institutional history and information. Performs inventory control and purchasing functions. Establishes and markets Trustee retention and recruitment events to include, but not Hmited to, Trustee bi-monthly meetings and EDC quarterly meetings and Afinual Legislative Luncheon. Performs administrative duties for EDC Foundations for the Future initiative. Oversees production and edits Notes, News and Views newsletter and EDC Forum articles. Maintains Master Calendar of Events for EDC and community. Duties and Responsibilities: (continued) Responsible for administrative duties for Economic Foundations and Membership Committees. Manages, oversees and provides back up reception, mail and phone assistance, to the Executive Assistant and Business Retention, Recruitment Manager. Performs other duties as assigned. · Decisions Made: Incumbent exercises judgment with respect to business, industry and organizational needs and activities. Decisions relating to policies and procedures, or interpretations of regulations are referred to the Executive Director of the Economic Development Council of Collier County. Contact With Others: Incumbent has extensive contact with CEO's, small busSness owners, state, city and county officials, Collier County residents and the general public. Required Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Extensive knowledge of the general business principles and practices applied in the organization. · Considerable knowledge of the principles and practices applied in related activities such as accounting, marketing, management and general business. Superior skilln in the oral and written presentation of factual information. Ability to plan and direct the work of an administrative, technical staff. Ability to meet with individuals from a variety of socio-economic backgrounds and to effectively present helpful information. P:,gc 20 of ~9 · ]6G . Minimum Qualifications: Any combination of training and experience equivalent to: Graduation from a four-year college or university with major course work in business administration, economics, planning or a related field. Two years of responsible professional experience in economic development, business administration, public administration, pla n ning, tourism or a related field with administrative and supervisory responsibilities. Essential Physical Requirements: None. Necessary Special Requirements: Possession of a valid Florida driver's license. *Above ]ob Description May Not Include All Duties Pe~Tormed · Established: 10/1/97 · Page I II II II IIII I III I I II I I I IIIIIII III ......... ' .......... III ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT Position Purpose: This position is responsible, professional work involved in the administration of the Economic Development Council of Collier County · which is responsible for the planning, promoting and implementing of the economic diversification program for Collier County to retain, expand, and recruit high wage jobs and business interests for Collier County. Major responsibilities include administrative and technical support for the Economic Development Council of Collier County and the Executive Dtrector of the EDC. Oversees the incoming calls, walk-in traffic, mail and distrlbutlon/coHection and conference room activities. Work is reviewed periodically through conferences and reports, observation and assessment by the Executive Director of the Economic Development Council of Collier County. Duties and Responsibilities: Performs administrative tasks for the Executive Director and professional staff of the Economic Development Council of Collier County. Performs primary reception and phone duties. Performs collation of economic diversification collateral materials. Performs tasks, as a secondary function, including inventory control, institutional history maintenance, Board of Directors correspondence and meetings, Business Assistance Workshops and meetings. · Responsible for facilities and conference room setup. Performs other duties as assigned. Decisions Made: Incumbent exercises judgment with respect to business, industry and organizational needs and activities. Decisions relating to policies and procedures, or interpretations of regulations are referred to the Executive Director of the Economic Development Council of Collier County. · Page 22 of 59 6G1 Contact With Others: Incumbent has extensive contact with CEO's, small business owners, state, city and county officials, Collier County residents and the general pUblic. Required Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: · Extensive knowledge of the general business principles and pra trices applied in the organization. Considerable knowledge of the principles and practices applied in related activities such as accounting, marketing, management and general business. Superior skills in the oral and written presentation of factual information. Ability to meet with individuals from a variety ofsocio-economic backgrounds and to effectively present helpful information. Minimum Oualifications: Any combination of training and experience equivalent to: Two years of major course work in undergraduate courses; business administration, liberal arts, economics, planning or a related field. Two years of responsible, professional experience in business, economic development, public administration, planning, tourism or a related field. Essential Physical Requirements: None. Necessary Special Requirements: Possession of a valid Florida driver's license. *Above Job Description May Not Include All Duties Performed Established: 10/1/97 · Page 23 of 59 · 16G1 Business Retention, Expansion and Recruitment Collateral Materials October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLUER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND & GOLDEN GATE FLORIDA · Page 24 of 59 I II IIIII II I I I I II I IIIIIIII 1 II I ........... I · 16Gl Fiscal Report October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 · Page 25 or' 59 II II II IIII I I III - IIIII ' /llil ...... I 16G]- Fiscal Report October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 Personnel · Salaries 517.534.60 Health Insurance $910.06 Taxes - FICA~edicare/FUTA/S UTA $1.341.40 Subtotal ~ 19~786.06 Equipment Purchases Gateway 2000 GP6266 52,560.96 Gateway 2000 GP6233 $2.975.42 Subtotal $5,536.38 Marketing Demographic Packages - Printing $3.360.00 Shipping & Postage $500.00 · Demographic diskettes $139.88 Arthur Anderson Business Study $1.000.00 Enterprise Florida/Florida Trend Ad $6,495.00 Industry Appreciation Awards $3.518.86 Subtotal $15,013.74 Total $40,336.1.______~8 · Page 26 of 59 16G1 Arthur Anderson Community Tax Comparison Study October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLUER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND & GOLDEN GATE FLORIDA · Page 27 of 59 FAX SHEkT ENTERPRISEFLORIDA EXPANSION/RETENTION TEAM FAX NUMBER: 850/922-95c~ FAX NUMBER: ;-- TELEPHONE NUMBER: I TELEPHONE NUMBER: 850/488-~.~00 ,, Qll251911 4:23 PM NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THE COVER PAGE): 1 ..~r.L~ttLApders_.on Study U. pdate 'i'"nis i,~ ~o advise you on ~he stares cfyour de~ai~ed individual c~mmunity t:~x :or.~p~ri-~a~ you 2Urcha~::~ ,:'. , conjunction with Enterpr,.~e Florida's con:tact with Arthur Anderson. I. Several corr, munities have not yet submi~ed their local tax rme mformauon to us..-Xr~hur Anderson: .~ j methodology requires input or'ail indivfdual community tax fa:: da:~ uphon: so th~: ou:cc~me t'i~ure~ be ran at one time. We have r~ceived the required information .fi'om nearly ail [he commur'.;:ies and the remainder to foliow shortly. For this reason, ail individual c~mmunity tax comparisons wil! be · aistribut~d m early February. 'l Thank you for your patience, if you he, ye any question; or cone:ms, pie:ese phon: me a; 'i · Page 28 of .59 Enterprise Florida/ Florida Trend Advertisement October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 Note: 50,000 copies published and distributed by Enterprise Florida. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COllIER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND & GOLDEN GATE FLORIDA Page 29 of .59 16c? CI,ty County DeSoto Count). Economic Development Or,lrl~PP,lrk, FL 32073.14[8 Ar~,lth.I ~J Contacts by County td~ (904) 269-0363 f;:' '~.:[ 9;~ .:809 Di~e County Collier Counly Allchul Cffin~ Btidtord Coun~ Calhoun Counlv l ....... ,,,,, [c~c ~Ire~h Of Comm~,~o, Commerre Sic 1~0 ]521 37~ ?~ (904) 964.5278 ~' ,~ , ;4 : ' , '~,11~ 2t~ fa~ {352) 378 7703 fa~, 19~)q64.2~63 ~,, ,~u,,, , t t,~, Iq.Ill 2(,J (,()21 Duval Courlty e mad It~lt.~ k ; g('~, ~ om e-mall: ~ham~,l~cess m.t e mall ~C.~swfJorldabusmes~ corn J,lCksor~,i,l~e · ~ ~c~ corn ' ' Charlotte County www ~wtlorul. H~ll'.~t,,.,,, i ~,n ~)f Cf)~,tm,~ ,. Baker Coun~ [~ ~ F~fldd'5 S~e Co,15t el Ch,lrlotJ~. (:ounlv Columbia County J.]~%~,~,t~,, rL ~22~2 :.n~ ', Baker Counh D~eiopment 571.Y H~ ~ld q,1 ] C Lm.,m. b,.I [ ,~k~, (hlv Ch,m~l.,f 20 L. Macue.',, ,%,. (40/~ b38 2~ (941 ) 627-3023 lOf~ S M,l~lOn 5t~,.,,l w~w h~', ,' '' ~ ' ' Macclenny, FL 32063-211~ f.w. ~407) 633 42~ L. iq4 I ) h;' I ~, { 1.1 L,Ike C~ly. (904) 259 6433 oread i~( I~c ,, fi.ifil,iv iIiJl.lml e-ma~l: ~lc,,,'~umm, ~t, I IqO,ll 75? ]6~0 [SC,Imbhl County Bay Coun~ Browatd County C~ltus Com~ly ~ , ,. , Developmenl ~uncd ~.lopment ~uIiciI A~x~,ltlofl el C~triJ~ County Inc The B~,,tcnn PO. Bo~ 18~ New R~wr Cenlet Ir~.)~O N M~',tdow C.'~I []lvd Wurhl If.hh, Panama C~. FL 32402 IR~O 2~[ La~OId~Blvd. Sle l~O C~y~l,ll~ivt,~ ~L {,i.129 Hf) SW~IhS~r~.~,t (850) 785813g FDa Lauderdale FL 33301 : {52} 7q5 200fl ~ .m fL 331 ~{~ p.,rv.,~, o;i J: ,,,, fa~: (850) 763 6229 ~o0, 7,1J I.l?O f.~, t tr)2~ 7q5 (}(}(]'~ ~ ~05) 5/q J ~inteeoz eom ~ho~ him e-ma~l t~.d, ,,,d,~r~ n,,t ..~.~ ,. ,,,., ,., ,.., ,,I t.. Pheee: 813-B21-5800 Fax: 813-822-5083 IT IAe;I: f Ia, ida Trend Book Divis~on PO. llox 61 I, SI. P~m.~'.burfl, FL 33731 Bis i.dis~..siM~ Sh,pp'ng & Handling-Books: $395. 1~, ~s0urce is a must for :J Check enclosed (moLe payabJ,. Disco~r how lo apply Nome on Card ~r hundreds d ,,,,,,,, ...... Flor ida ~holorshi~ ' S ~HU TOTAL I~oa4:813 fl21 5flOO hr,: 813-822-5083 B~ Mm1: Florida Trend Book D,vis,on PO Bnx 61 I, St. Petersburg, FL 33731 '/~." A ~J~ ~ ~ S~ ~ Sh,prmg & ttondling. Books: S3.95 - 1st boer ~ U' ~ ~'" ' g~l grant p~rams rapturing ove~ S2l J Check enclosed (make ~yablo ; .J t ~ - , billi~ In SI~e and ~etal lunding edminister~ bl ~,~,~,,~*~ "~' ' ~e Stale of F~dm ~lh this valuable r~urce ~ B~II my: ~VISA '~Ma~,,,,C(:, ' ~Mk fm~nd~ Account ~ ,,"* ' ~ 2~ ~S ~.~ t lame on Cord Nome Phone ~~,.~'~ ~ '--nd~--s Is · comprehensive di,.o. ~ of o~ I,~ private grantmoking foundations in ~,t~ ~~~' ~ St". of Florida, and provid, the inlorma,ion ....... ' - ~ /,, , ~'11 ~ ~en sffking foundation grants. ~ ................. ~ ' ,,,.. ............ ~ C~ ~ide ~o FI~ F~c~ '590.00 Sublo?l ......... ' BOOK DIVISION ~ ?~?~ ?!0~M . :s FLORIDA Page 30 of 59 m,u~auun m several o~ melr employees, me laDU provided to the owner various locations in which their employees could live. To help find qualified employees, the EDC placed job openings on the EDC web site. · 16Gl 6) Unified Marine l)istributors 1481 Railhead Blvd. Naples, FL 34110 i) Industry: Distribution - Marine related products ii) SIC Code: 5091 iii) 44 jobs retained and 17 new jobs created iv) Average wage: $25,000 v) Direct Economic Impact: $1.5 million vi) Capital Investment: $75,000 vii)Date company moved into new facility: 12/97 Assistance provided by EDC: The EDC was instrumental in finding a location for this company to locate their business. EDC connected the company with a local realtor and a funding source who agreed to build a 100,000 square foot facility, half of which houses Unified and the ,~ther half as spec space. EDC coordinated meetings with Collier County staff to facilitate the company locating in Collier County. Assistance '.vas provided in coordinating the groundbreaking ceremony for the I00,000 square foot facility. Assistance provMed by Collier County: Collier County staff expedited the permitting process for the business to allow them to locate on time in their new facility. This ,,vas very important to the owner and made a difference in keeping the Company in Collier County. Total capital investment includes new purchases of machiner3,, buildings a~td renovatton costs related to the expansion or location of the business. Direct economic impact equals average wage times the total number of jobs retained and created over a one year period. Page 36 of 59 16c? Clay Counly DeSoto County Alslhormlv Economic- ' -uevelopment Contacts by County *' It~.l~f { I.l¥odc',rcvtmr.t~ HI'I Dine County Collier County t .... ,, ~, ,, -:,,--.?. Machua C~n~ Bradford Coun~ Calhoun County F ........... {~, .,, [cm~tK ~fe~h OI Co111{llefo, Commerce 5te 120 fa, 13521 378 7703 fa~: l~04l 964.2863 l.. ,x',,', , i , LH U~I Il ?h3 (,02 [ Duval County e ~1 ~H.k k : gt'm~ ~ om e-1~4d: ~ham~.~,d~ce~ n*,t e mad: ~c. ~wflo~dabusme% *~ ~c~ corn · Charlotte Coll~ty w~w ~wflo.a,o.~.,..,,,., r./. ,)1 co.,m~.~, erevard C~n~ [,,,,,,,,,,,, I],%1.111,Ilt,'lll ( lllllll i1 Baker CounH [~ ~ F~ftda's S~e Coasl ol Ch.~rluth, Cou.lv Columbia County ~.~ Baker Cotl~ ~e~ment 57[-Y H~ ~ld q.11 C Lm..m. lr,lll I ,Ik*, Ctl~ Ch...I.'~ .I Comm,~.., R~k~tRP, I I .Ii'F)% I'.tl (;h,.h,lf,,. I I I I'l~l I (;Il. trill'l( I' f,t, M~clenny, FL 32063-2118 L~.1407)633.42~) L., Iq4[ll,?/t,¢l,l [ak~'(,*Iv. fL {904} 259 6433 e ntall ¢~{ l%(.., tl. lf~f.t~ mfl.~ml e-mad: edc,,r~u~,,,;,, u, I IqO,l} 752 3600 EsC,mlb~a County fax: 4504} 259 2737 ww~ ode &p,t('~, ore ,*~*~ .'~ ,"?,' ",',.,', :',-,' c;,,- ,.q, un I, %:. ' ':: t'....,. ~ , .'.. , · ~ ' .... Bay Coun~ Btoward County C~tt,& Cmmly , ' , e.m3d ~lvtn~,:inlerozc~ Lt, "l'~,l 4,..1 {Ih/ "'t,l'l '"l,. ,,dm,.,,~hr.,l t,I, ~mte~ol eom {~ho~ him e-m~d tw.l~ .,,d,m u-I ~.t.~ ,, ,,. , ,,, ,.., ,,I t.,~ ,.,1 ,' e., I~e~e: 813.B21.SBOO Fmc: 813.822..5083 ly MijI: Ilor;du Trend Book Division PO. Bax 61 I, SI. P~h,..J)u~g, fL 33731 ~Js JndJspensJbJe Sh,pping & Handling-Books: S3.95 · l~t ~source is a must for Lj Check enclosed (mc ke payable I,) Dlsco.r how !o apply Name on Ca,d for hundr~s d ,.,,,,,,., ..... JrJ~ Jnd ~llowship~ ,~r~. Florida ~holorshlps BOOK DIVISION 7~, soles fax (Fi n,,J~ .S TOTAL Plmee: fl 13-82 I. 51'1OO F~--: 813- 822- 5083 · /Mm'l: Florida Trend Book O,vis,on PO P,(~, 611, St. Petersburg. FL 33731 ~" A ~J~ ~ ~ S~ ~s fih,pp,,,g & ttandting-Books: $3.95 - 1st boo~ /~ , provid~ d~ail~ ~flp~s d ~e ~n 2~ S 1.00 eec h ~,,~u,t,o..n' n '~ govemmnJ jfonl prqfoms fepr~ting ~er 521 ~ Check enclosed (make ~ya~Jo ',, ~ 'cd · T , , ~ ~,~ t ~ ~" ' billion in StYe and ~erol lundmg odminister~ by ~ ~"~,~ .1~.,.'" ~ 'L ' ' ' ~e Slate of F~do. With this valuable r~urce ~'11 h~ ~e Idom~n ~ fm Imaling Account · L,:; ,' ,,.... ~ 2~ p~ ~.~ r Jame on Co,d Nome Phone t~ ~,~:.~;~ F~nd~Hs is, ,ompre~ens~e di,~o~ Add,ess ~, '-,~ of om I,G p~te grontmaklng foundations in C ,tv State ~' ~e Slme of Florida, and provid~ the information . ......... ~_ . - .... ~ ~ $~.~ A Guide to Florld~.Stgt~ ~rams 580 00 ~ C~e ~ide to Fl~i~ F~,o~ 590.00 BOOK OlVlSlON ............... ="'"' '"' 16G~- Collier County Economic Diversification and Business Assistance Program Overview October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND & GOLDEN GATE FLORIDA Page 30 of 59 ...... ,,, i ilia I IIIIIIII III I IIIIII I I II IIII II I IIIIIIII ..... II Economic Diversification and Business Assistance Program Overview October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 Total Jobs Retained: 90 Total New Jobs Created: 157 Direct Economic Impact: $6.5 million* Total Capital Investment: $8.3 million I Business Retention, Expansion and Recruitment I Requests for Business and Demographic Information 31 packages distributed to existing businesses considering expanding in Collier County. .51 packages distributed to companies considering Collier County as a business destination. 144 packages distributed to businesses requesting general business information for Collier County. · 45 phone requests for demographic information fulfilled, Direct economic impact equals average wage times the total ntttnber of jobs retained and created over a one year period. Total capital investment inchtdes new purchases of macllinery, builditlgs atld renovation costs related to the expansion or location of the bttsiness to Collier Cottlt~y over the first year. *See Addendum A for additional economic impact analysis of companies assisted through the Public/Private Partnership. ?age 3 ! of 59 Businesses Assisted October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 Firms noted below include those companies that moved i~tto tl~eir ~tew/expanded facili~.' during the months of October 1, 1997- December 31, 1997. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND & GOLDEN GATE FLORIDA · Page 32 o~' 59 · 16Gl Businesses Assisted October I, 1997- December 31, 1997 1) Certified Diabetic Services 2373 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 i) Industry: Wholcsale- Medical ii) SIC Code: 8099 iii) 35 jobs retained and 60 new jobs created iv) Average wage: $32,000 · v) Direct Economic Impact: $2.5 million vi) Capital Investment: $4 million vii)Date company moved into new facility: 12/97 Historical assistance provided by EDC that enabled the company to locate in their new facility in December: EDC assisted Certified Diabetic Services (CDS) in the application for designation as a Qualified Targeted Industry Business through Enterprise Florida. This assistance enabled the company to obtain tax refunds in the amount of $3000 per new job created or a total of $180,000. The EDC provides job openings for the company on the EDC web site to help find qualified employees to fill open positions. Historical assistance provided by Collier County that enabled the company to locate itt their new facility itt December: Collier County Commissioners approved matching funds for the QTI tax refund in the amount or $90,000 over five years. 2) Expressway Electric II01-H Sun Century Road Naples, FL 34110 · i) Industry: Electrical Contractor ii) SIC Code: 1731 iii) 30 new jobs created iv) Average wage: $27,000 v) Direct Economic Impact: $810,000 vi) Capital Investment: $30,000 vii)Date company moved into new facility: 11/97 Assistance provided by EDC: In order to entice the company to locate their business here and help facilitate the relocation of several of their employees, the EDC provided to the owner various locations in which their employees could live. To help find qualified employees, the EDC placed job openings on the EDC web site. · Page 33 of 59 Forte i'lastics. Inc. 4506 Mercantile Avenue Naples, FL 34104 i) Industry: Manufacturing- Plastic ii) SIC Code: 3089 iii) 16 new jobs created iv) Average wage: 27,000 v~ Direct Economic Impact: $432.000 vi) Capital Investment: $ 1.2 million vii)Date company moved into new facility: 12/97 Assistance provided by EDC: The EDC sent out a Parcel Post to local Realtors to help find a facility for the company. Parcel Post is a confidential lead sent via facsimile to Realtors in Collier County to assist businesses in finding a suitable location for their company. Ongoin~ dialogue with the owner of the company throughout the decision process solidified their decision to keep the company in Collier County. The EDC is assisting the company in registering for the Work and Gain Economic Self-Sufficiency (WAGES) program and obtaining sales tax exemption on machinery and electricity. Assistance provided by Collier County: Collier County will be expediting permits for the company as they do renovations to their existing facility. 4) Glasparadies 4420 Mercantile Avenue Naples, FL 34104 i) Industry: Manufacturing- Glass ii) SIC Code: 3559 iii) I job retained and 16 new jobs created iv) Averages wage: $27,000 v) Direct Economic Impact: $459,000 vi) Capital Investment: $500,000 vii)Date company moved into new facility: I0/97 · Assistance provided by EDC: The EDC met with the company initially and determined their qualifications for assistance in the expedited permitting program. EDC coordinated meetings with Collier County staff to facilitate the company locating in Collier County. Assistance provided by Collier County: Collier County staff provided excellent customer service in expediting the permit process for the company. The staff worked diligently to mitigate any problems that arose to enable the company to have the permits issued in a timely manner. · Page 34 of 59 · 1661 5) Interiors Cultured Marble 1734 Trade Center Way Naples, FL 34105 i) Industry: Manufacturing- Marble ii) SiC Code: 3999 iii) 10 jobs retained and 18 new jobs created iv) Average wage: $27,000 v) Direct Economic Impact: $756,000 vi) Capital Investment: $ 2.5 million vii)Date company moved into new facility: 12/97 Assistance provided by EDC: The EDC assisted the company in registering for thc WAGES program and obtaining sales tax exemption on machinery and electricity. Initial meetings were held · between the EDC and the company to determine eligibility for the expedited permitting process. Initial meetings were coordinated between the company and Collier County staff to begin the expedited permitting process. The EDC publicized the activities of the company to further promote economic diversification efforts in Collier County. Assistance provided by Collier County: Collier County staff provided excellent customer service in expediting the permit process for the company. The staff worked diligently to mitigate any problems that arose to enable the company to have the permits issued in a timely manner. Page 35 of 59 · 16Gl 6) Unified Marine Distributors 1481 Railhead Blvd. Naples, FL 34110 i) Industry: Distribution - Marine related products ii) SIC Code: 5091 iii) 44 jobs retained and 17 new jobs created iv) Average wage: $25.000 v) Direct Economic Impact: $1.5 million vi) Capital Investment: $75,000 vii)Date company moved into new facility: 12/97 Assistance provided by EDC: The EDC was instrumental in finding a location for this company· to locate their business. EDC connected the company with a local realtor and a fundin~ source who · agreed to build a 100,000 square foot facility, half of which houses Unified and the other half as spec space. EDC coordinated meetings with Collier County staff to facilitate the company locating in Collier County. Assistance was provided in coordinating the groundbreaking ceremony for the 100,000 square foot facility. Assistance provided by Collier County: Collier County staff expedited the permitting process for the business to allow them to locate on time in their new facility. This was very important to the owner and made a difference in keeping the Company in Collier County. Total capital investment includes new purchases of machiner3,, buildings and renovation costs related to the expansion or location of the business. Direct economic impact equals average wage tithes the total nttmber of jobs rctaitted and created over a one year period. Page 36 of .59 Addendum Page 37 of 59 16Gl · Economic Multiplier October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 Total Indirect Jobs Created: 218 Total Indirect Earnings Impact: $3.34 million ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLUER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND & GOLDEN GATE FLORIDA · Page 38 of 59 · 16 1 Economic Multipliers October 1, 1997- December 31, 1997 The basis of "economic impact analysis" is a measurement or' the direct and indirect effect within an area of expenditures induced by the creation of a new or expanded facility. Thc impact shown below is based on the jobs retained, jobs created and the average wage of those jobs. Using multipliers based on the company's standard industrial classification code (SIC) Enterprise Florida, the State's economic development puNic/private partnership has determined the following economic impact over a one year period for the companies below to be: Source: Enterprise Florida, 1998 Employment Impact Company Employment Total Retained Total New Jobs Total Indirect · Impact .lobs Jobs Crc ~ted Multiplier Certified Diabetic Services 1.4624 35 60 a4 Expressway Electric 1.7109 30 21 Forte Plastics. Inc. 1.5929 16 9 Glasparadies 1.7661 I 16 13 Interiors Cultured Marble 1.4214 10 18 12 Unified Marine Distributors 1.7365 44 17 ,45 Total 55 157 144 Earnings Impact Company Earnings Impact Average Wage Total Indirect E,'umings Multiplier Impact · Certified Diabetic Services 1.3933 $32,000 $1.2 million Expressway Electric 1.6690 $27,000 $.54 million Forte Plastics, Inc. 1.4838 $27,000 $.21 million Giasparadies 1.4638 $27,000 5.21 million Interiors Cultured Marble 1.5800 $27.000 $.44 million Unified Marine Distributors 1.4875 $25,000 $.74 million Total Earnings Impact $3.34 million Note: Direct effect multipliers are for the Southwest region of Florida which includes the counties of Charlotte, Collier, Glades. Hcndry and Lee counties. · Source: Enterprise Florida, 1998 Page 39 of 59 1661 Letters of Acknowledgment October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLUER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND & GOLDEN GAI"E FLORIDA · Page 40 of 59 I ii IIIlll I I I III II IIII II IIIIII IIIIIII II ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ I I · 1661 Certified Diabetic Supplies, Inc. 2373 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, F! 34104-6103 941-430.5000 hnua,v 26. 1998 John M. Plssidomo, Chairman Economic Development Council ot Collier County. Inc. 32011 Bidley Lane. Suite 162 · Naples, Florida 34105 Dear Mr. Passidomo, We are settled in our new corporate headqu~trters and I am happy to repur: ti~v.t it is a ~eat success. I am pleased to give you an update on lhe CDS corporate expansion. :ks outlined in our "Grand Slam Expansion Pr%,-ram", acquisition of our new 35,0(.~.~ square foot headquarters in N~ples w~ our first priority 'and CDS closed on the building December 17, 1997. "I'he unoccupied portion of the building was renovated, office and computer equipment purchased, and the warehouse oper&tion w~ modernized. In this first phase alone, we spent 54,089,472. The application also include the creation of new jobs. To date we have added 20 of the 60 new positions. They include clerical (7), administrative (7), sales (1), shipping (1) and management (4) positions for la ~tverage annual wage ot' 539.531. The new average atmual wage for all employees excluding officers is $32,569. Clearly our corporate expansion meets the obiectives cf Enterprise Florida to create high wage jobs in a business that is stable and operating year around. I want to take this opportunity to thank the EDC for your assistance facilitating the two grants we received (Stat of Florida, Otlice of the Governor and Collie~' County.). In particular, I would like to eotc the exceptional service provided by the EDC staff. Our mutual goals include improving the community, · our company and our employees. We appreciate 2,'our support. Si~erely, Pffer J. Fiscina, CEO, Chairman of the Board · Page -~ 1 of 59 · ~ 16G1 EXPRESSWAY ELECTRIC, INC. INDUSTRIAL · COMMERCIAL. DESIGN-BUILD · DRAFTING STATE LIC.# EC 0001832 1/28/98 EDC TAMMIE MCELROY DEAR MS MCELROY, WE WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR HELP IN OUR RELOCATION TO THE NAPLES AREA. THE PRESS RELEASES WERE EXTREMELY INFORMATIVE AND VERY PROFESSIONALY COMPOSED. WE BELIEVE THAT YOUR OFFICE IS A VERY ESSENTIAL PART OF THE EXPANDING ECONOMY OF THIS AREA AND LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU IN THE FUTURE. SINCERELY MEL VAUX V.P. · Page 42 of 59 16Gl PI. A STI .. o iiV C, I I II II 450~J Mercantile Avenue Ne,ole.~ I:1 34104 Phone gA1.435.7792 Pa~ gAf.AilS.780! Ema~l ,~orfe~401 corn 1/20/98 Economic Development Council of Collier County 3050 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 120 Naples FI. 34104 941-263-8989 Attn.; Tammie McEIroy Dear Tammie I just wanted to take this opportunity to thank you for your assistance and advise you of our progress. At the present time we are starting to order equipment gnd hire employee's for this new operation.. With any luck we should be up and starting to run by April. That's 2 months behind schedule but I hope we will employ at least 15 people by the end of the year. Thanks again for your assistance and we will keep you advised of our progress and probably call upon you again for further assistance. Sincerely · John Dixon · Page 43 of 59 Victor Alexander, Inc. 4425 Progress Avenue Naples, FI 34104 PHONE (941) 403-9745 FAX (941) 403-9746 Susan Paregis, Executive Director E.D.C. Collier County 3050 N. Horseshoe Drive Suite 120 · Naples, FL 34104 01/12/98 Dear Ms. Paregis, I woud like to take this opportunity to express our sincere thanks to the E.D.C. and Collier County Goverment for all the assistance provided us during our relocation from Europe. Since our first meeting when our relocation decision was solidified, it has been a very positive and rewarding experience working with both Groups. We thank you for for all your help and look forward to a long and continuing relationship. Walter Wiesmueiler President ~'~ .... ""'"" INTERIORS CULTURED MARBLE, INC. MARBLE W '"~ 1734 TRADE CENTER 'e/AY NAPLES, FL 34109 Tel: 941-598-3004 FAX: 941-566-8,164 Tammie McEIroy Janua~ 9. 1998 Economic Development Council 3050 North Horseshoe Dr. Suite 120 Naples, FL 3410,~ Dear Tammie: I would like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude to you and the EDC for your help in expediting the permit acquisition process for our expansion. I appreciate your consistent attention, patience and professionalism throughout this venture. At the beginning of our business involvement, I stressed to you the importance of moving The Interiors Workshop and Interiors Cultured Marble to their new location quickly. You were instrumental in making our move as swil't as possible. It has been a pleasure working with you, and I would be more than happy to recommend the EDC to any new or expanding business in Collier County. Thanks again. · Sincerely, David J. Ayotte President [RECEIVED J J~,N 1 2 1998 · / Page 45 of 59 · 16Gl Unified Mar/ne, Inc. .%I..I,'~'£F~CTURER.~ OF .(;£.,I .';£.~,5;E ~,L.IRI.~/E PR( 1481 RAILHEAD BOULEVARO NAPLES, FL 34110 PHONE: 941 594.7997 FAX: 941.594.3C~0 JANUARY 14. 1998 TOLL FREE: 800 282.872S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY 3050 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE SUITE 120 · NAPLES. FLORIDA 34104 ATI'N: TAMMIE MCELROY DEAR TAMMIE, THROUGH YOUR EFFORTS, WE WERE ABLE TO MOVE INTO OUR NEW HEADQUARTERS. ON TIME, WITHIN 180 DAYS OF THE CONCEPTION OF THIS PROJECT. YOU ENABLED ME TO KEEP THIS BUSINESS IN COLLIER COUNTY, MY HOME FOR THE LAST FOURTEEN YEARS. BECAUSE I REMAINED WITHIN THIS COUNTY, THE COST OF THE MOVE AND NEW EQUIPMENT, $75,000, ALSO STAYED HERE. [ APPLAUD YOUR PERSEVERANCE AND DETERMINATION IN DEALING WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO MINIMIZE RED TAPE AND HELP ME REALIZE A NEW FACILITY. THANK YOU. · Se~a'ing the spin'ting goocl.~ indus/~a' ~'i/u'c 1~),~4 [?~it tt~ a! mir JVeh ~'ite hltp'/fwww ~eo~'cn~*c corn Page 46 of 59 · 16Gl Capital Formation October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND & GOLDEN GATE FLORIDA · Page 47 of 59 · 16G1 ENTERPRISE FI.ORIDA, INC. MICROENTERPRISE FLORIDA GRANTS PROGRA.~I APPLICATION The attached application reflects a request prepared by the Economic Development Council of Collier County and the Collier County Banking Partnership to obtain grant funds to begin a micro loan program in Collier County. Enterprise Florida approved a grant in the amount of $25.000 and the Collier County Microenterprise Corporation has been formed. Through the program, loans will be available to businesses in the amount of $500 to $I0,000. The loans will help to foster economic diversification in Collier County. With a disproportionate number of small businesses located in Collier County, local lending institutions have historically focused on residential lending and trust/asset management. Through the Collier County Microenterprise Corporatiun, local financial institutions have organized to provide better opportunities for businesses to obtain financing in our local market. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF COLUER COUNTY, INC. NAPLES, EVERGLADES CITY, IMMOKALEE, MARCO ISLAND & GOLDEN GATE FLORIDA · ?age 48 of .59 · 16G] ENTERPRISE FLORIDA, INC. MICROENTERPRISE FLORIDA GRANTS PROGILAM APPLICATION FORM 1997 APPLICANT: Legal name of the organization directly responsible fo.." the project Include point of contact information Collier County Banking Partnership Attention: Joel Whittenhall, President ' c/o First National Bank of' Florida 27975 Old 41 Road · Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 Phone (941) 992-2201 Fax (941) 992-0215 Name of the President/CEO of the applicant organization - include address, telephone, fax, e- mail See above APPLICANTS'S FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER The organization will be applying for the federal I.D. number in December in conjunction with the application of 501(C)-3 status, DATE OF APPLICANT'S INCORPORATION IN FLORIDA December 1997 RESIDENT COUNTY (COUNTIES) OF THE PROJECT Collier County GRANT AMOUNT REQUESTED $50,000.00 TOTAL OPERATING' BUDGET OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATION $75,000.00 (includes grant money plus $25,000 local match) HAVE YOU APPLIED OR ARE YOU CURRENTLY RECEIVING FUNDS FOR THIS · PROJECT FROM OTHER STATE AGENCIES YES NO X Ifyes, list the total amount offunds you are currently receiving N/A I have read and understand the eligibility criteria and evaluation requirements as listed in the RFP and declare that the Collier County Banking Partnership (organization) is eligible for the FY 1997-1998 Enterprise Florida, Inc. MicroEnterpfise Florida Grants Program. Joel Whittenhall, President November 28, 1997 Collier County Banking Partnership Date · Page 49 of 59 16Gl EN TERPR ISE FJ, ORIDA Government & Ousines$ Developing Florida's Economy · ENTERPRISE FLORIDA, INC. MiCROENTERPRISE FLORIDA GRANT .REQUEST Collier County MicroLoan Program SUBMITTED BY: COLLIER COUNTY BANKING PARTNERSHIP Naples, Immokalee, Everglades City, Marco Island and Golden Gate, Florida November 28, 1997 · Page 50 of 59 16G1 Executive Summary Historically, Collier County has been supported by three principle industries - agriculture/fishing, construction and tourism. 'Trade agreements and net bans h,~ve ncgatively impacted local agricultural and fishing products. Construction related jobs arc generally population driven and eventual build out will necessitate further market diversification. Tourism jobs include a preponderance of'entry level, non-technical positions and fluctuate with the seasonality of' the year. All ofthis indicates the need for diversification of our local economy, with less reliance on these three principal industries. · With a disproportionate number of'small businesses located in Collier County, 98.83%, local lending institutions have historically focused on residential lending and trust/asset management. Through the Collier County Banking Partnership (CCBP), local financial institutions have formed an organization for the betterment of the local, regional and state economy. Goals of the Banking Partnership include community outreach, development of special credit related products, interact with new and existing organizations and programs that serve small businesses and entrepreneurs. For thc first time in the history of'Collier County, the Board of County Commissioners has included in their goals and statements of policy a commitment to economic diversification. On September 23, 1997 the Board unanimously approved a public/private partnership with the Economic Development Council of Collier County to proactively promote high wage job retention and creation in Collier County. One of the primary objectives of'the partnership is capital formation opportunities for proactive business diversification of' the economic base of the Naples, Immokalee, Everglades City, Marco Island, Golden Gate and the unincorporated areas in Collier County. Approval by Enterprise Florida, Inc. for funding in the amount of $50,000.00 ,,',,ill enable the Collier County community to better serve the micro loan needs ofthe small businessperson and entrepreneur. These loans will be available for amounts between ,$500 and $ I0,000 and at a fixed interest rate of prime plus 2%. The MICROENTERPRISE FLORIDA grant will advance our local county's ability to meet our goal of'economic diversification for the diverse population we serve. We respectfully request your approval. Joel Whittenhall, President Executive Vice President & Senior Lending Officer Collier County Banking Partnership First National Bank of Florida Page 51 of 59 · 1661 Table of Contents Page Scope of Work ................................................................... 4 Institutional Capabilities and Qualifications ................... 6 Community Commitment and Support ........................... 8 Local Participation ............................................................ 9 MicroLoan Allocation ....................................................... 9 Page 52 of 59 Scope of Work The Collier C, ounty Banking Partnership ,.vill establish a MicroLoan Banking Consortium to administer and fund a MicroLoan Program in Collier County. The MicroLoan Program is intended to assist small businesses that may be unable to obtain financing through ordinaq; banking or public government agency channels. Furthermore, the program is targeted to Iow to moderate income entrepreneurs and minority owned businesses. Through the program, short-term loans between $500 and $I0,000 are made available to small businesses at a rate ofprime plus 2%, for the purchase of equipment, furniture, invento,7, supplies and working capital. Working through local education providers, borrowers will be pre-qualified, according to their level ofbusiness planning expertise, to participate in an eight hour training session prior to receiving funds through the MicroLoan Program. The training session will be paid for through the MicroLoan Program and available at no charge to the borrower. Borrowers must either have been in business for a minimum of two years or have a business plan, occupational license, borrowing resolution, tax I.D. number and articles of' incorporation, as applicable. Ifthe borrower needs assistance in completing any of these items, the Banking Consortium will work with local organizations, such as SCORE, the Small Business Development Center and Naples Entrepreneurial Workshop (NEW) to assist the borrower in developing a business plan and registering with the necessary local, state and federal agencies. The Banking Consortium will work with and provide ongoing assistance through local business organizations such as the Latin American Business and Professional Association, Economic Development Council of Collier County, Small Business Development Center and the Center for Leadership and Innovation at Florida Gulf Coast University, Edison Community College, Lorenzo Walker Institute of Technology, Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) and Naples Entrepreneurial Workshop (NEW) to promote the MicroLoan Program and assist small businesses. It is the goal of the program to foster entrepreneurship within Collier County. The first year goal for the loan pool is $75,000, with an estimated $10,000 held for technical assistance, training and operational expenses. The average loan size is expected to be $2500, for a total of approximately 26 loans in year one ofthe program. Loan terms will range from six to twenty-four months; which will allow for more loans, depending on the borrower's pay back schedules. The total loan pool is expected to increase an average of $10,000 per year over the next five years for a total loan pool of $135,000 by year five. · Page 53 of 59 16Gl Timeline for Implementation December 1997 * Registration complete for 501 (C)-3 not-tbr-profit corporation status for the Collier County MicroLoan Banking Consortium. · Form loan committee and assign staff support.* January 1998 · Implement signed agreement between each of the participating banks. . Form purtnerships with local education providers to administer workshops, seminars, etc. · for program participants. · Complete marketing brochures and distribute through supporting organizations. · Distribute Press Release regarding implementation of the MJcroLoan Program and availability of funds. March 1998 · Ongoing efforts to promote the MicroLoan Program. · First loan made to borrower. · Begin planning of two workshops to take place in April and October. April 1998 - November 1998 · Ongoing overall effort to promote the MicroLoan Program. Additional loans made depending on demand and qualifications of'borrowers. · Continued planningofMicroLoan workshops. · Continue forming business assistance opportunities for borrowers and potential borrowers. * Develop further relationships between loan recipients and applicants with local banks to gather their support for the MicroLoan Program and encourage their participation. · Develop ongoing relationship with the Manufacturing Incubator Center in Immokalee to assist capital needs of those companies located at the center. · Continue promotion of the MicroLoan program with the Latin American Business and Professional Association, Economic Development Council of Collier County, Small Business Development Center and the Center for Leadership and Innovation at Florida Gulf Coast University, Edison Community College, Lorenzo Walker Institute of Technology, Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) and Naples Entrepreneurial Workshop (NEW) · The Collier County Banking Partnership currently has a loan consortium that worlcs strictly with providing home loans. A separate consortium will be formed to provide the business micro loans. See additional information regarding the qualifications of the home loan consortium under the Institutional Capability and Qualifications section of this application. · Page 54 of 59 16Gl Institutional Capability and Qualifications The Collier County Banking Partnership (CCBP) is an association of financial institutions in Collier County that have evidenced, and reinforced their commitment to be more proactive, and to take a leadership role in the local community. The CCBP is sensitive to the needs of the community and is working to provide a conduit, whereby financial institutions can work together to ascertain and more effectively address community needs, facilitate home ownership for minority and Iow and moderate income families and provide business opportunities for small businesses. Collier County Banking Partnership Mission Statement The Collier County Banking Partnership is dedicated to thc effective delivery of credit products, other financial services, and educational programs that are responsive to ascertained needs with special emphasis on the minority, very Iow, low and moderate income families, and small business communities. We will accomplish this through a partnership of'financial institutions that share a common commitment to the betterment of our community. CCBP has already implemented a very successful home loan program in Collier County. This program provides home loans to very Iow, Iow and moderate income borrowers. In the first twelve months ofthe program, a total of 116 home loans were approved through the consortium at a total value of over $8.5 million. Collier County Banking Partnership Board of Directors and Members President Joel E. Whittenhali, Executive Vice President & Senior Lending Officer First National Bank of Florida Secretary Terry Cala, Branch Manager NBD Bank Treasurer Anna Liu, Private Banking Officer Huntington Bank · Page 55 of 59 Board Members Linda Newman, Assistant Vice President GulfCoast National Bank Frank Rodriguez, Business Development Ot~cer First National Bank of' Naples Sam Hinkle, Vice President U.S. Trust The Banking Partnership members include: · · AmSouth Bank · Barnett Bank · Citizens Community Bank · Comerica Bank · Conununity Bank of Naples · Fifth Third Bank · First National Bank of Florida · First National BankofNaples · First Union National Bank of Florida · C-ulfCoast National Bank · Huntington Bank · Mercantile Bank · NationsBank · NBD Bank · Northern Trust · Pelican National Bank · PNC Bank · South Trust Bank · SanTrust · · U.S. Trust · Village Bane of Naples Funds received through Enterprise Florida to establish a MicroLoan program in Collier County will be used primarily for direct loans to small businesses. The remainder of the funds will be used for technical assistance and training programs and lastly for operational expenses to administer the program. · Page 56 of .59 166! Community Commitment and Support Collier County Economy Collier County is committed to the diversification of the local economy. Reliance on residential taxes, high cost ofliving and a low average wage provides for limited upward mobility for the residents of Collier County. Over the last five years, the area's unemployment rate has fluctuated from a high of 9.4% to the current rate of 6.0%, which places Collier County higher than both the Florida and U.S. averages. · In the areas of Everglades City and lmmokalee, which are both designated Enterprise Zones, the unemployment rate reaches a high of 14.7%. Furthermore, the purpose of'the MicroLoan program is to assist small businesses. Collier County ranks 25u' in the State of Florida for percentage of small businesses, 98.83% of the total private establishments, making Collier County a prime area for a MicroLoan program. Minority Business Assistance The Latin American Business and Professional Association CLABPA) reports that there are over 1500 Latin American businesses in Collier County. LABPA is currently conducting a su~wey of all of these businesses to &term/ne their business needs. Preliminary results show that financing and education are two of the primary needs of this sector. LABPA leaders are fully supporting the creation ora MicroLoan Program to assist the Latin American businesses in Coilier County. Incubation Center Through the efforts of'the Collier County Airport Authority, a manufacturing incubator center has been establ;shed at thc newly completed Immokalce Airport Industrial Park. A recent study by the National Business Incubation Association shows that incubators have a significant economic · impact to local communities, and a return of $4.96 for every $1 invested. A MicroLoan program will enable these companies to be more successful as they graduate from the business incubators. Economic Diversification The Economic Development Council of Collier County (EDC) works with existing and new businesses to assist in the retention and creation of high wage jobs in Collier County. According to the EDC, many companies seeking very small loans find it difficult to obtain financing in the local market. The Collier County MicroLoan Program will assist those companies and foster additional economic diversification opportunities in Collier County. · Page 57 of 59 6Gl Local Participation The Collier County Banking Partnership, through its member financial institutions, is committed to dedicate a minimum of $25,000 in local matching funds for the Collier County MicroLoan Program. The Banking Partnership will also dedicate sufficient volunteer staff time to properly promote the program and assist the borrower through the loan application process. MicroLoan Allocation MICROENTERPRISE FLORIDA funding $50,000 MicroLoan Allocation $40,000 Business Training $2,500 Administration $2,500 Collier County Banking Partnership Local Match $25,000 MicroLoan Allocation $20,000 Business Training $2,500 Administration $2,500 Total 575,000 · Page 58 of 59 Collier County MicroLoan Program · Page 59 of 59 · RE( ED :' MAR 11 1998 tJ.~ ~,~. ~__ c. ~foard of Count~ Co~issioners, CO~LIE~ COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR COU.?MOUSE · BLDG. March lO, 1998 ¢? ttonorable Barbara B. Be~, Chai~an I~~ ~ Board of County Commissioners Collier County Couflhouse - Admin. Bldg./3 Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Ms. Be~: For your in fom~ation, this date we have made a distribution of Cu~ent Ad Valorem Tax and Non-Ad Valorem Assessment to thc Board of County Commissioners, after Tax Collector's commissions. as follows: County Wide $1,370,505.29 Dependent District 474,155.66 Solid Waste 15%194.71 Grand Total $2,003,855.66 Attached you will find a distribution recap showing year to date totals of taxes collected nat of discount for 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997. Yours respectfully submitt,~,,~ Michel A. Welsh, Controller Co/~ier County Tax Collector's Office MAW/pld cncl. cc: Hon. Timothy J. Constantine Hon. Timothy Hancock Misc. Cortes: Hon. JohnNorris . I Hon. Pamela Mac'Kie Mr. Robert F. Fcmandcz, County Administrator Oate: Hon. Guy L. Carlton, Tax Collector Mr. Claude A. Haynes, Deputy Tax Collector Item~. /~ '~' Mrs. Mafilyn Lewis, Property Tax Dept. Director Copies To: 16H 1 ME~O~O~ Date: March 26, 1998 To: Joyce Houran, Grants Coordinator Collier County Sheriff's Office From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Certificate of Acceptance of Subgrant Award Enclosed please find the original document as referenced above, Agenda Item #16H1, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on March 24, 1998. If you should have any questions, please contact me at: (8406). Thank you. Enclosure State of Florida Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Community Assistance Tallahassee, Florida 32399 CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF SUBGRANT AWARD The subgrantee, through its authorized representative, acknowledges receipt and acceptance of subgrant award number 98-DV-TT-09-21-01-043 in the amount of $173,400, for a project entitled: Domestic Violence Unit Project for the period of 09/01/97 through 02/28/99, in accordance with the statement of work contained in the subgrant application, and subject to the Department of Community Affairs' conditions of agreement and special conditions governing this subgrant. (Si~Qatu~-~-6f Au~ho~-i~gial) (Date' ~' ~6cePtanCe) Barbara B. Berry, Chai~q (T~ed Name and Title of Official) DCA-CJ Form 1 (June, 1985) 3301 East Tamiami Trail · Naples, Fkxida 34112-4977 John C. Nmris (941) 774-8097 · Fax (941) 774-3602 District 1 Timothy L. Hancock, AICP District 2 Timothy I. Constantine District 3 Pamela S. Mac'Kie Dislrict 4 Barbara B. Berry, Di~rict 5 March 24, 1998 State of Florida Department of Community Affairs Governor's Task Force On Domestic Violence and Sexual Violence 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Attn: Rosa M. Morgan, Chief Bureau of Community Assistance Re: 98-DV-7T- 09-21-01- 043 Signatory Authority Dear Ms. Morgan: Pursuant to the referenced grant, Sheriff Don Hunter has my permission to have signatory authority on grant related documents. SIGNATURE ; " i Don Hunter Sincerely, Ba~r~ara B. Berry Chairwoman County Commission Approv{~i imm to fo~ & I{}g'm,l ~ A~Lstant County Attorney