CSC Minutes 10/05/1990 Children ' s Services
Council of Collier County
Minutes/Transcripts
October 5 , 1990
CHILDREN'S SERVICES COUNCIL
0
Friday, October 5, 1990
Agenda
Introduction of Acting Chairman - Paul Pinson
Call Meeting to Order - Acting Chairman, John Passidomo
CElection of Chairman & Vice Chairman
Welcome to Community - Chairman
Discussion and Adoption of Rules of Procedure - Asst. County Attorney, Brenda Wilson
Appointment of Committee Chairman:
(1) By-Laws
(2) Budget, Office Space & Personnel
(3) Needs Assessment
(4) Acquirement of Operational Funds
(5) Nominating Committee - Citizens Advisory Board
Presentation by Jim Hansen, Sheriffs Office - Community Staffing Board
Decision concerning regular time and place of all meetings
Update on Lee County's Children Services Council - Bob Ritz, HRS District VIII
r
Community Comments
Adjournment
C
Cti
MINUTES of Children's Services Council
PLACE: Collier County School Board Administrative Center,Estey Avenue,Naples Florida
TIME & DATE: 9AM, Friday, October 5, 1990
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Honorable Ted Brousseau Circuit Judge, Juvenile Division
Alma Cambridge
Nelson A. Faerber, Jr. Collier County School Board
Lal Gaynor
Bea Harper
John Passidomo
Dr. Tom Richey Superintendent, Collier Cty Schools
Bob Ritz Deputy District Administrator,HRS
Dick Shanahan Collier County Commissioner
Mary Ellen zum Felde
Paul Pinson, Project Coordinator for Naples Alliance for Children, introduced John
Passidomo as acting Chairman for the first organizational meeting. Mr. Passidomo asked
for nominations of a Chairman for the Council. Nelson Faerber nominated Bea Harper,
it was seconded by Dick Shanahan, and approved unanimously by the council members.
Mr. Passidomo asked for nominations for Vice Chairman. Lal Gaynor nominated Dick
Shanahan, it was seconded, and approved unanimously by the council members.
Mrs. Harper accepted the gavel as chairman of the council and gave a brief welcome to the
community.
Brenda Wilson, County Attorney, briefly discussed the responsibilities of the council, rules
of procedure, general liabilities, and restrictions of the Sunshine Law. It was unanimously
agreed that the council would be governed by Modified Robert Rules of Order. Ms. Wilson
indicated that she would prepare a written memorandum concerning parameters of the
council's responsibility, as well as researching Superintendent Richey's liability to the School
Board for his service on the Council.
Mr. Passidomo suggested and it was agreeable to the council that each council member
identify him/herself and give a perception as to the individual mission for service to the
council. This was accomplished and there was a general discussion concerning the
establishment of a mission and immediate focus of the council. It was generally agreed that
this could be a preamble to the by-laws, and that although the focus could be placed in the
preamble, the mission would be clear once the Needs Assessment had been done as
required in the County Ordinance.
There was general discussion concerning the Needs Assessment which the council
anticipates getting underway as soon as funding is in place. Community Foundation and
another private foundation have indicated an interest in participating in providing
approximately $35 - $40,000 for costs.
Appointment of Committees Chairmen were made as follows:
By-Laws Chairman Nelson Faerber, assisted by
Brenda Wilson, County Attorney
Budget, Office Space, & Personnel Lal Gaynor
Needs Assessment Dr. Tom Richey
Acquirement of Operational Funds John Passidomo
Jim Hansen and Doug Nichols from the Collier County Sheriff's Office gave a presentation,
including a video, concerning a program geared for second-time juvenile offenders. They
have proposed the idea of creating a staffing board which will review life histories of
second-time juvenile offenders, with the view of finding services and support systems with
which to head off the juvenile from becoming a career criminal. The council will study
further the proposal for future implementation.
The needs assessment was discussed at length and Dr. Richey was asked to prepare a
Request for Proposal for submission to agencies interested in doing the assessment. He
r-- indicated that he would do so and would have a rough draft for the next council
meeting.
Judge Brousseau presented a proposal to the council for helping him with establishing a
"volunteer judicial review panel" as provided by a statute created by the State Legislature
effective October 1, 1990. Juvenile Court is required to do a case review every six months
for every child in foster care. The review panel would be made up of volunteers to review
the case history and the current progress of the child and make recommendations to the
Juvenile Court concerning services to the child.
After further comments by various members of the community, it was voted to adjourn.
Meeting adjourned at 11:45AM.
Kathryn C. Campbell
Acting Secretary
NOTE: Please see verbatim transcript attached.
ommemmomminnwimingomio
q _ ,..
Page 1
TRANSCRIPT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES COUNCIL's first meeting, October 5, 1990
(The first part of the meeting was lost on the tape.)
„�
11
The tape began right after Mrs. Harper accept the gavel as chairman of the
Children's Services Council.
CHAIRMAN: Town Summit meeting which was held. . . .I can't even remember now. . .
seems like it was in May. . . .or perhaps back in the fall of 1989. . .I met Paul Pinson. . . .
and I was floundering and had been, for at least two years, trying to this
Children's Services Council established. I met Paul almost in an adversarial relationship
because I already knew what I wanted done, and he was new to the community and
didn't understand all of it. But anyway to make a long story short, Paul and I sat
down together and I can only tell you that it is because of Paul Pinson that we are
sitting here today. It is not my doing, although it has been my dream. The one
thing that I would like to see. . . . we have no funds everyone knows that. . . .but
_ because of the commitment of three of our county commissioners, we have formed the
council. Hopefully, some day we will have funds with which to do things for our
children here in Collier County. Right now I would like to see our council bring the
community together to focus on the needs of our children and the things that we can
do to make life better for them. This morning I was just talking with Ed Ferguson
who had an incident right outside of our door. . . .and I run into this all the time with
my work with District 8 Human Rights Advocacy Committee, in which a young man was
holding his baby and said his ex-wife had just come and said "you take her. . .I
don't have the time. . .I've got to go to work". Now what is going to happen to babies
who are left in that position. This is what the council is all about. We must do
something for our families and our children. I can only tell you that I hope all of
1 you are as committed as these ten people. . . .noone is getting anything out of this
. . . .noone has a hidden agenda. . .the only thing that we are concerned about is doing
something for our children in Collier County. This has been a long time coming,
and we're only about half-way down the road. The next step is that we have to get
ourselves on the referendum and we have to get the money with which to take care
of our children. That's about as much as I can say. . .except I really appreciate
everyone who has made an effort to come here to show your commitment to our children.
They are indeed the future of our community. Naples is a gorgeous place to live,
but when you get down, and I am sure Judge Brousseau can back me up in this. .
and when you hear it day after day after day. . .that there are children and families
i
Page 2
suffering in this community and we're doing nothing about it. So I beg your support.
Go out and talk it. . .tell it to your church. . . .talk it every place you go. . .the
Children's Services Council must do something about our children. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN: Brenda, we'd like you to discuss our rules of procedure?
WILSON: I believe everyone should be able to hear me from here. Paul has asked me
to come to you
RI CHEY: Please, if you could go to the mike . I believe Paul has this set up today
and it would greatly help . . .
WILSON: I'm sure my comments are so important that. . .
SHANAHAN: We understand that.
WILSON: I need to identify myself to the council? I am Brenda Wilson, Asst.
County Attorney, the attorney with our office who worked with Paul in trying to
get an ordinance drafted that would bring this council into fruition and as many
of you know and Commissioner Shanahan and Paul know very well. . . .there were
some bumps along the road getting to this point. But I'd like to tell you how pleased
I personally am that the council has been created, is here now, and congratulate all
of you for your efforts and for your appointment. Paul has, in his efficient way, put
together for you a package that I think has in it most everything you will need
to be a council member. You have a copy of our ordinance, I think most of you have
probably read that already, it also includes a copy of the most current statute that
allows for the creation of the children's services council, which by the way, the
Legislature has called the Childrens Services Council. We were actually ahead of
the legislature they were still calling it a Juvenile Welfare Board. Negative
connotation there. You also have I believe in the package, a print out of the sunshine
law. I think you can whatever you need to conduct your business. I know that you
have council members who are equally if not, far more advanced in knowing Roberts
Rules of Order, and rules of procedure than I, having at least a Judge sitting on
the council. . .and several elected officials. . .so I wouldn't presume to lecture you on
the rules for procedure. I am happy to answer any questions that you have. I
believe that at some time in the future you probably will want to have an attorney
to advise your council. I will be happy to serve in the interim until you have
I such a person. I have to be very careful not to have any situations come up where
I am advising the Board of County Commissioners and advising the Childrens Services
Council. As you're all aware, you're an independent council, and stand on your own.
So I'll be happy to answer any questions that you have.
4
v...
r
'age 3
BROUSSEAU: I just wonder, I know when I was City Attorney for Everglades City,
the Sunshine Law was rather new then but I got calls from the Mayor of Naples
and Mayor of Everglades City almost every week on what can we do, and what can't
we do in talking, and I know half of us here are elected and are probably very familiar
with the sunshine law but perhaps for those who aren't and haven't, you should give
us a 30 or 60 second review at least.
WILSON: Probably 30 second review is easy. The main thing you have to remember
is . . .don't get together. . . .two or more of you and make any decisions that are
binding decisions. You are supposed to be holding your meetings in public forum,
the public has a right to come and see what is going on. I think that's particularly
important with a body that has taxing authority because the public is particularly
interested in how monies are going to be spent. So I think the bottom line is just
. . . .it doesn't mean you can't go to lunch together. . . .it doesn't mean you can't have
dinner together. . . .it really comes down to having meetings where you are discussing
council business. That's supposed to be conducted in public forum.
BROUSSEAU: Can you discuss topics that we may discuss here at that luncheon
which in other words you always have problems. . .you're sometimes looking for
solutions . . .can you discuss some of the possible solutions?
CI WILSON: lo give you the conservative answer, you probably shouldn't because you
don't know who is sitting at the table next to you who may be overhearing the
luncheon conversation and draws conclusions that would reflect poorly on the
council. Any other questions?
FAERBER: There's no difficulty with us speaking to whoever our Executive Director
is, though?
WILSON: That's correct. Staff members.
FAERBER: Two or more gather with staff members. . . .
WILSON: That's correct. It is the same problem that we have. I have to be very careful
not to let my commissioners both talk to me at the same time, but certainly you
are entitled to discuss matters with your staff members. . . .right now . . .your
Executive Director being the primary one with whom you will want to talk. . .
and your attorney. And something else you may want to ask your attorney about
or even your private attorney. I know the question has been raised and I don't want
to give you any advice about it today, but just raise the question and recommend you
I tip may want to get the answer to the question and that is. . . .about financial disclosure of
this council. You're not required to give anyfinancial disclosure to the county. . .
the county is not particularly interested in it. . .but there may be some disclosure to
the state. Just a general statement. . . .to maybe. . . .sometimes financial disclosure strikes
fear in the hearts of good council people, but it is not a financial disclosure that includes
a balance sheet. . .it is mainly to give information about interests you have, where you
Page 4
derive your funds. . .not the dollar amount, what your net worth is, that type of
thing. It is just from whence your financial support comes. Any question
about that.
PASSIDOMO: Madam Chairman, it seems to me that what we are in effect doing now,
is forming a local government and in doing so, there are substantial legal responsibilities
that are imposed on us. In reviewing very quickly the newly enacted Florida Statute
that went into effect July 1, it seems to impose specific requirements on a
council and those are to immediately after the members are appointed, and officers
are elected, to identify and assess the needs of the community and so forth.
They go on for two pages. Can you give us a sense of what our legal responsibilities
are. . .either now. . .or in the form of a memorandum if you cannot because of your
other conflicting responsibilities, do you have any recommendations as to where we
can seek that guidance?
WILSON; Well, you are correct. The statute outlines for you what your responsibilities
are and what the parimeters of that responsibility are. You do have, I believe, under
the ordinance . . . .the first order of business is to determine what the needs are.
I am very intimately familiar with the terms of that ordinance and what the county
commission was interested in receiving from this council, and I think the directive of
the ordinance was to come back to the Board of County Commissioners with a study,
if you will, of what the needs are in Collier County, and how those needs can be
met. . .financially if there are financial needs which we know that there are. . . .
specifically what those financial needs are and how they will be directed. That is
the first order of business because that is the first step before requesting that the
Board of County Commissioners that they submit the question of funding to a
referendum. And as you know, we don't have another regularly called election
until 1992, however, the discussion has been made to the commission about calling
an election specifically for this purpose and that is something that was asked of
our office, and we answered affirmatively that it is possible to do that. So,
the short answer is that the first order of business is certainly to do the needs
study and accomplish that. I would presume that you want to, as quickly as it
could be put together. I know the Naples Alliance for Children has done a lot of
work in that direction already and I think there's information included in your
packet about some of those needs. And of course, gathering of information, which
has already been begun from the different agencies and departments within the
county who work with children. . . .because I also am aware from the meeting before the
40. county commission that they are concerned and interested in not having redundancy.
I think that is one of the major goals of this council. . .is to make the resources are used
appropriately and that you don't have several agencies that are doing the same thing.
I
Page 5
But I will be happy to also submit to you a written memorandum giving you those
general outlines if you so require.
PASSIDOMO: I think it would be helpful in addition to our statutory imposed requirements
the requirements that are incident to forming a government like this. I would think
this would be helpful to this council.
WILSON: Okay
RICHEY: Ms. Wilson, is there any unusual liability attached serving on this council?
I only ask this question because of the representation of the school board if there is
a legal liability . . . .can that be passed to the board.
WILSON: I don't believe there would be. I would be happy to delve into that further
to confirm that, but in the other districts et cetera that I have dealt there hasn't been
such.
RICHEY: It doesn't bother me personally, I've been sued before.
WILSON: Well, it keeps us busy. Keeps me employed. But I will certainly make
sure.
RICHEY: I would like to know the particular attachment to the school board of
Collier County . . . .if in fact, I would be a detriment to them. I would like to know that.
WILSON: Okay I will try to answer that question.
FAERBER: Brenda, I noticed one provision in here and I have just scanned the
l statute but the chairman needs to be bonded because she's signing checks. . .either
the chairman or the executive officer a thousand dollar bond or something.
i So we might want to make arrangements.
WILSON: Yes.
I
BROUSSEAU: Do we have money to buy a bond?
FAERBER: I think we have some money somewhere but I guess we'll hear about that
i later.
WILSON: I thought I was going to be the briefest one up here.
4 FAERBER: Do we need to adopt these. . . .Roberts Rules. . .by motion?
WILSON: I think it is appropriate for you just to make a motion and confirm that
you intend to be ruled by Roberts Rules of Order.
FAERBER: The modified Roberts Rules of Order. I would so move.
SHANAHAN: Second it.
CHAIRMAN: All in favor. Unanimous.
WILSON: Any more questions?
CHAIRMAN: Not at this point. .thank you.
Page 6
Chairman asked that all council members identify him/herself for benefit of the audience.
They were as follows Judge Brousseau, Juvenile Judge; Lal Gaynor, Dr. Tom Richey,
Superintendent of Schools; Nelson Faerber, School Board Representative; John
Passidomo, member of Naples City Council; Bea Harper, Alma Cambridge, Mary Ellen
zumFelde, Richard Shanahan, Collier County Commissioner, District 1. It was
noted that we were missing HRS representative.
CHAIRMAN: Does everyone have a copy of the agenda. Did you pick it up when
you came through? If you don't, there are agendas available. We have several
committees that we wanted to get formed and going and I would ask council how you
would like to do this. Would you like to nominate from the council for chairmen
of the various committees or would you prefer appoint a chairman for each committee,
or how should we go about it? We will do it whichever way you want it. How do you
want it John?
PASSIDOMO: I think it is at the discretion of the chair. It may be helpful,
Madam Chairman, if we have a general philosophical discussion as to the orientation
of this council, and as to what we perceive our individual missions to be, collectively
and individually, and so that we get some sense of where we want to be in March
of 1982. (meant 1992). That may help us to find the roles of these separate
committees and it may very well be that that will help us in the selection of
committee chairmen. . .and actually flow from defining their roles to determining who
is best to serve in those capacities.
CHAIRMAN: Are you saying that we should postpone it until the by-laws are
done?
PASSIDOMO: Well, I think the by-laws may very well be a rather perfunctory
endeavor, but it may be helpful that if the appointments are made at this meeting
today and they're made by motion and resolution of the entire council, but before
we get into a discussion as to the appointment of those committee chairmen, it
seems to me that if we could each, probably in no more than 60 to 120 second,
give some sense of what we perceive the mission of this council to be, and it may
give some focus to our discussion.
CHAIRMAN: Well, would you like to begin?
PASSIDOMO: Well, it seems to me that it is very important to establish a focus, that
we will now recognize that we now have and will eventually have limited resources, so we
will eventually have to establish priorities. Whether those priorities are prevention and
early intervention, as other councils have done, or whether we may select another
source of emphasis for activites, it seems to me that we have to develop a mission state-
ment and develop some sense of measurable goals and objectives to measure our progress.
It also seems to me that we should set a clear and unequivocable signal to this
Page 7
community as to what the purpose of this council is all about if we intend to be
successful in March 1992. When we go into the needs assessment, we have to
have a very clear and defined idea of what we are all about. My suggestion is that
we select prevention and early intervention as an objective, there's a good economic
case for that, and that we establish that by intervening early we actually prevent
the kind of problems we see manifested on a regular basis.
CAMBRIDGE: Madam Chairman, I sorta concur with John. We certainly should
estab lish a very important statement as to chat our mission would be. Prevention
is of the utmost important. Just this morning on the news our sister county,
Pinellas Councy is introducing a program for crack babies. This is going to be
a national problem, and certainly we have witnessed it in our own community, so
I would concur that this would be a very important mission.
CHAIRMAN: Mary Ellen?
ZUM FELDE: I come from Pinellas County. I have lived here 11 years. I am very familiar
with this type of program, and having been a former director of the YMCA in St.
Petersburg for about five year, I am first-hand familiar with prevention. Prevention
and early intervention is not always exciting, and it doesn't always command as much
as crisis programs, and it is very hard to measure "prevention". How do you put a
measurement on what you're doing? I think there are many many agencies that deal
with that problem all the time, and I think that is going to be one of the challenges,
frankly of this counancild. preveHow n iosilo nwe say that we are wanting to fund programs of
early intervention,/ and yet all of us who deal with children and are parents, know
the importance of it. I would say that's the goal we should be striving for and yet,
I think we have to carefully define what we are about.
SHANAHAN: Well, I think we've got a lot of work to do, and certainly a statement about
what direction we're going is extremely important and I think we have to communicate that
and pull the community together. I don't think that at this point the entire community
thinks that there should be a Children's Services Council. I think we have a very major
responsibility and challenge to get the community to understand the need and to recognize
the need and benefits thereof. I am for putting together these committees and getting to
work in that direction. I think that how we do, will determine success and whether we're
able to sit down two years from now at referendum and funding, but it's going to take
a tremendous amount of communication. We've got a lot of time, and timing is going
to be absolutely essential, starting nice and slow and building up to a crescendo, or
however we decide is the best strategy to go, but I do think the statement is
to understand the need, recognize the need, and support this council and this community.
Page 8
FAERBER: Well, Bea, perhaps what we should do at this time is appoint someone
or several persons . . .whether from this committee, in whole or in part, including
11+ members of the public, to draft that statement of purpose, and bring it back for
the council at the next meeting.
CHAIRMAN: You think that could properly be part of the by-laws committee?
It all goes together.
FAERBER: Sure. It would be the preamble to the by-laws. Yes, that would be fine.
CHAIRMAN: Dr. Richey?
RICHEY: Well, I echo what John had to say about the early intervention. It would
seem to me that one of the first things we would do would be the definition
of the mission statement, and then probably, something that I perceive to be needed,
based on what Mr. Shanahan said was - we're going to have to do a very massive
0
0
Page 9
job in terms of informing the public about what the council is about. You can't
ect then
to support the council if they don't understand what the mission is of the council.
I think we're going to have to pay special attention to an information program
that is widely disseminated to all the agencies, all the segments of our community,
as to what we're trying to do, and the last area would be that we're going to have to
have some sense of commitment with the information program that we're going to stand
together in terms of the mission be committed to that. It concerns me just a little
bit, though, in terms of the process, I understand the need for the mission statement
because that gives us a sense of purpose, but it would appear to me that before we focus
focus, John, on the early intervention, unless I misunderstand what the needs assessment
is about. . . .we need to think very quickly about the needs assessment, because we may be
as a council talking about early intervention, the needs assessment that comes from
the community may be an entirely different matter. So I would think that before we
set priority #1 as early intervention and prevention programs, that perhaps the most
important thing, in order to methodically attack this problem, would be to do a
comprehensive needs assessment because what Group A believes to be a/Mcbr?iarYi
versus what Group C believes versus what each individual council believes would
most nearly get to us through a needs assessment. Now this may be a too complex
0 task, but it seems to me to be the orderly way to attack the problem. . .to set our
central focus. That's more than 120 second, I apologize.
GAYNOR: I have to agree that the needs assessment is probably one of the most
important things we have to do, to educate us and the whole community. My field
here has always been in the area of child care and the great need there, and
I would like to see everything come under one umbrella, not to have duplication
throughout, and I think the needs assessment would bring this out.
BROUSSEAU: I think our primary goal is that the council needs to be an educational
and informational type goal, and I think we need to avoid appearing to be a taxing
authority and that that is the whole reason we came into existence, to levy taxes,
and spend more money, not that money sometimes doesn't help. My experience with
Naples is that it is a very giving community. We have a lot of volunteers and have
a lot of generous people here, and also as a Juvenile Judge I have people who come
in front of me and I talk to, that are totally unaware of some of the circumstances.
To give you a specific example. . . .cocaine babies a lot of people in the community,
" including the users as well as non-users, think that the problem with cocaine babies
is that it is addicted when it is born. And those of us who have seen the real
problem is that they may be hyperactive, they may have stunted growth, they may be
retarded, they may have small heads, they may have all sorts of problems, which is
going to affect the community. The school board is facing it in the future, because
I
Page 10
they are telling me that instead of one teacher for 30 students, they'll need one teacher
for two of these cocaine babies when they grow up. And awareness like that and
education should be our primary goal because I think the rest will come . Incidentally,
we may find that we need to raise some money but I think coordination and information
is a primary goal. For two reasons - one is that if we don't get the referendum passed
that is being proposed then we're not going to be disappointed and we're not going to
fall on our faces and say we're gonna fail.
HARPER: Well, I think I will just reiterate that I have been involved in this dream for
three years . Everything that you have been saying is what we have anticipated
and what we have been planning for. But when we first started, my board of Naples
Alliance for Children tried to do a needs assessment and as you know, we are all
limited in our qualifications and expertise in how we could go about it and how we
could do it. In just doing basic work, we became a little frightened in the duplication
that we felt existed within our community. We began to feel that services are all
spread out in different directions, where if we came together, and worked in a
united way. . .together. . . .that we could do more for our children. . .rather than
everyone going off in separate directions. I am totally committed to prevention. When
we established Youth Haven back in 1972 . . .that was to be our goal prevention
of child abuse and neglect not just to furnish shelter. As you all will remember,
when we opened our doors in 1972 the state agency of HRS was born and we were
no longer under the umbrella of our county welfare on a local basis, but the state
had taken over. HRS would be doing the prevention of child abuse and neglect. . . .
Youth Haven would furnish the shelter. But be that as it may, I think the item
of importance is our needs assessment and everyone in this room knows that we are
not going to be able to operate the Children's Services Council without some kind
of funding, so that is going to be a major task. I will say that we have had one
citizen come forward with a nice check for $3000 and I deposited it yesterday
for work on behalf of the Children's Services Council. We're getting there.
Are there any comments from the community?
PINSON: A couple of points would help Bea to note, and that is that the statute
clearly specifies that the highest priority , once the council is established, is the commiss-
ioning of a needs assessment. The ordinance that was drafted does the exact same thing,
says basically that we need to do a needs assessment before we go in front of the
county commission. There has been research already done and work in that area.
Just to bring the entire council up to date , one important note to make, the needs
assessment needs to be an assessment that is done by an objective organization, $o be
perceived by the public as being objective is going to be paramount when we go to the
polls. It cannot be done by an advocacy group, etc. There have been some funds
Page 11
talked about in terms of being contributed towards that needs assessment. In fact
there are several members in the audience today who represent a foundation who are
considering the possibility of contributing "x" amount of dollars for that. So some work
has been done . . t. re t free Universities who have been contacted who are interested
in doing that needs assessment , and there are probably thirty more who would be very
likely participants in that needs assessment, who have told us that it will be a study
that can be done in about six months. It will be a study that can be accomplished
by the spending of about $40,000. So those are the general parameters that we have
access to at the moment. It will be a study that will cost about forty thousand dollars,
take about six months to do, and we know that it needs to be done as the highest
priority of the Children's Services Council.
CHAIR: Are there any other comments from the audience?
DAVID ENTING
(Immokalee) : Madam Chairman, in terms of what occurs to me in listening to all
this, is that to obtain credibility in the community, that possibly that the council could
consider holding off on a mission statement . . .or finalizing the missing statement, until
after the needs assessment. And in addition to that, I think many times a needs
assessment results in education and a further understanding and awareness of the
problems and the extent of the problems. And there is the possibility that the needs
assessment could result in a body of knowledge that differs from what the public at
large perceives to be the problems in the community. So I see this study to be very
significant in formulating, not only a mission statement of this council, but as well as
positioning the council in the total community of the county, so it seems to me that this
is a very significant process, for laying the groundwork for all your work and credibility
which this council has in this community. I am Dave Enting. . .I live and I work in
Immokalee, and I am primarily associated with an outfit called Habitat for Humanities.
Thank you very much.
BURT SAUNDERS: Madam Chairman, I have made a few notes as I was listening
and I have a tendency to ramble from time to time, and I apologize for doing that, but
I would like to do that for a few moments if I could. First, I want to congratulate all of
you for embarking on a very exciting and very important mission . I think that there are
a couple of things that you need to keep in mind. I think everybody has pretty much
said that but I'd just like to kinda recap a couple of things. First of all, the needs
assessment is obviously most important, the most critical function that you're going to
perform and your ultimate goal is to prepare the needs assessment and convince the
Page 12
public - that the public recognizes these needs and is willing to tax itself to fund those
needs. Because you can have the most beautiful needs assessment prepared, you can
have the most beautiful mission statement prepared but if you don't get the voters to
approve the referendum, then most of your work really will have been for naught, and
we certainly don't want to see that happen. I am sure it is going to be a very difficult
task. As you know, the county commission spent two years studying the 1-cents local
option sales tax and we still haven't been able to convince a majority of the voters at
this point, based on polls, that this tax is necessary and we've had the full weight of
our staff and two years of study, and we still are at a point where we think that that
tax may not pass because the voters may not be willing to tax themselves. What you're
going to be dealing with is even going to be more difficult than that, and so I think
you need to always keep in mind how can you convince the voters of the ultimate
goal? That is, taxing themselves. The assessment is going to have to be very
professional. Mr. Pinson made some comments on that and he is 100% correct. It has to
be professional. It has to be objective. If it looks like, as Mr. Pinson said, from an
advocate group, then to begin with, then it is going to be brought into question.
It's going to have to be conservative. You don't have to go for the moon on this.
You have to be able to at least get your foot in the door, but you have to go for
something that is realistic, conservative, and something that will be acceptable to
the voters. How do you accomplish that? You're going to need to involve the
community. It can't just be this citizen's group and many of your supporters who will
be here when you need them. You have to involve people who are not necessarily
your supporters at the outset. I think Dr. Richey was commenting on the importance
of bringing the public into this process, bringing in Homeowner's associations,
bringing in no-tax groups, bringing in the Naples Tax Watch, for example, to
participate. . .to get the community to participate. Keeping the media participating,
this will be your greatest tool to accomplish this. I think that I can speak for the
county commission when I say that we will commit to as much staff time to assist you,
we will provide any kind of county information that is available to us. I will say that
I believe that Brenda Wilson will be available to represent this council. I am sure
the county commission will go along with that. One other important aspect has been
mentioned and that is funding. I will certainly volunteer to help in raising funds.
I have had several calls from business people in the community who are willing to
make contributions. They may not be large but in total they may be significant.
So I think that the bottom line is the goal to convince the public to tax itself. That
is going to be a terribly difficult objective, but I think it is one that you can accomplish
if you remain objective, professional, conservative and you just keep that realistic goal.
Again, congratulations on what is going to be a very exciting task for you. Thank you.
1
Page 13
CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else? No? Well, I have just to interject one more
thing. I have lived in this community for going on 27 years, and when I first began
this, my dream, I would have people say to me "you will never ever get people in
Collier County to tax themselves for Children's issues" and I have never believed
that for I can remember when we started Youth Haven in 1969 that there was not a
person in this community, even down to the smallest child, who did not become involved
and who did not contribute to the establishment of Youth Haven. And I feel, that
when we do the needs assessment and the community knows that there definitely
is a need, they will say "yes". I think there's a very small minority who is so
hard-hearted that they can say no to a child. That's my feeling. We have a lot of
work to do but I am totally optimistic that we will reach our goal --and that we will
win at referendum--- without a doubt. Are there any other comments?
CAMBRIDGE: Madam Chairman, it is of the utmost importance for us to remember
that 25% of the total population in the United States is composed of children. 100%
® of our youth is our heritage---they are our future , and so this makes this group very
very important.
CHAIRMAN: I think one of the things which came out loud and clear in the Naisbitt Study
and which rather shocked me because I guess I had lived here so long and when
I first came here that was not the case at all. . . .there were very few children as I
recall, although I had children in school at that time. But now 23% of our population
is composed of children ages 0 to 18, where 25% of our population is composed of
those of us who are 65 and older. So you have a balance, and we are doing things
in this community for our elderly that we are not doing tfRirnRur children. So, I feel
if that were a shock to me out of the Naisbitt Study, /then the average elderly citizen
in this community does not realize this. They see themselves as "Naples" and that's
not so, we have a lot of children and families out there who need to be helped.
So shall we go ahead with the appointments. . . .how do you want to do this do
you want to nominate committee chairmen ?
FAERBER: I can make a suggestion to youor by-laws, as I have personal knowledge
Oar that Brenda Wilson is reigning Queen of by-laws. She just finished doing by-laws
for the bar association . Would you be willing to chair that? Can you?
WILSON: I think I just got permission.
4
Page . 14
' CHAIRMAN: Nelson, why wouldn't you chair it and then work with Brenda?
FAERBER: I'd be happy to work with Brenda.
SHANAHAN: I nominate Nelson Faerber as Chairman of the By-Laws Committee.
. Seconded.
FAERBER: Well, Brenda. Anyone else want to volunteer to work on the by-laws?
CHAIRMAN: Instead of going through all of who's in favor, etc. , we're all
agreeable Nelson for you to do the by-laws by general consent?
And, then I'd like a chairman for budget, office space, and personnel. We're going to
have to work up a budget to know exactly how much we can spend. Is there someone
who would volunteer for this chairman? Lal, how about you?
GAYNOR: IillrItie Thappy to.
CHAIRMAN: Any other nominations? Is that unanimous? Thank you.
And now we need a chairman for our needs assessment.
SHANAHAN: How about Tom Richey. Can you spearhead that one?
RICHEY: I can attempt it. You understand that my being associated with the school
system, there might be an interpretation that there's a bias being. . .
® SHANAHAN: Well, I think we have to live with that and select the best individual
to head up that committee. It is an extremely important one and I think Tom would
be the best one, if the rest of the ;board feels the same way.
CHAIRMAN: May I just say one thing? I would like for it to be perceived that there is
no conflict and so my feeling is that perhaps someone from the "appointed" members
by the governor might be better to chair it and work with you, Dr. Richey.
RICHEY: I'll be glad to,. but I must say that I am biased for children.
CHAIRMAN: We know that, Dr. Richey.
SHANAHAN: You know that doesn't go away. The entire council is going to be
perceived that way, Bea.
CHAIRMAN: You think so, Dick?
SHANAHAN: Oh absolutely.
RICHEY: I'll be glad to work with them, but I think, Madam Chairman, that was an
area that I thought we ought to discuss after you go through the appointments because
there are significant dollars attached to it, and we need to understand the procedure
that the council wishes to adopt. Are you gonna
FAERBER: That's one thing we need to discuss. I really would support Dr. Richey
for the needs assessment, primarily because I see it as a committee that is initially
going to select a professional firm, and I know that Dr. Richey is familiar with
selecting consultant type firms.
SHANAHAN: Madam Chairman, I would nominate Dr. Richey as chairman of the
needs assessment study.
{ ,
Page 15
C
FAERBER: I would second that nomination.
CHAIRMAN: Then I will withdraw my reservations, and if there are no objections
Dr. Richey will serve as chairman of the needs assessment study.
(There was missing on the tape - that portion of the meeting where John Passidomo
was appointed chairman of the "Acquirement of Operational Funds" Committee).
CHAIRMAN: The last committee is chairman of a nominating committee for various
citizen advisory boards, who will be working and advising the council on various
things. Actually, I don't think that that committee will probably be active until
we have our by-laws set up so that the committees will know how they will function,
under what parimeters, under what powers, so that is not going to be a very
active committee at this point until we get the by-laws completed. However, I would
like to have a chairman nominated.
PASSIDOMO: Madam Chairman, can I make an observation about the role of that
citizens advisory committee. It seems to me that that is an essential component of the
0 work of our council. That is our means of outreach into the community. They are
our ears and voices out in the community advocating on behalf of the mission that the
needs assessment drives us towards. I think that no matter when they get underway,
I agree that the by-laws and needs assessment has to be developed, but they are a
very important part of the work of this council and a very important selection in
choosing their chairman.
SHANAHAN: If I may, I'd just like to add, I full subscribe to John's position on
that. I think the citizens advisory board is going to be extremely helpful and
important in communicating to the public at large. It is probably, after the needs
assessment, I think one of the most important committees that we are going to
address.
FAERBER: As well as communicating back to us.
SHANAHAN: Oh absolutely. It's two way communication, so I think
RICHEY: Madam Chairman, would it be appropriate to put that request in abeyance until
the council further organizes and works? I think you will have input from the community
and input from other council members and perhaps someone will step forward and
express a strong interest in heading that committee, at the appropriate time.
CHAIRMAN: I think that is a good suggestion, so why don't we just put that
away for the present time, and discuss it at a later meeting.
CHAIRMAN: We have asked Jim Hansen to come here, not particularly to say that the
council is going to take on any program but one of the things that we would like to do
Page 16
at our council meetings monthly or whenever we have it to have education from the
community as to ideas they may have as how we can better help our children, and we've
asked Jim Hansen to come today. Paul, would you like to introduce Jim?
PINSON: If I could, let me set the tone for Sergeant Nichols and Hansen's presentation.
There is a perceived need for the council to have some substantial issues to be able to
struggle with, to be able to succeed, to wrestle with, to get your teeth into over the
next year and a half. The fact of the matter is, without funding, which is the prime
power behind the council, the idea of the council, there are very few initiatives that
you can undertake. We can go out and raise private funding and do a needs
assessment, et cetera, et cetera. But you cannot become the funding mechanism. at
you were set up to become without that power of taxing, or at least with some/source
of funding. One of the things that you can do, is to consider initiatives that can
benefit the community, initatives that are primarily self-funded. I think what you're
going to hear today is a presentation by Sergeants Hanson and Nichols in presenting
a proposal to you, not to ask for a decision today, but just to listen, and at some
point in time for the council to make a decision adopting this particular proposal
that will indeed be self-funded over the next year and a half, one that will accomplish
a tremendous need in the community. Now to balance what I just said out
I think it is incumbent upon the council to consider the following fact one of guoizc ing
philosophies needs to be. . .has to be. . . .that the council can become the unifier of
service providers in our county. It can become the instrument by which all the
fragmentation0 ceara ate cetera, is eliminated. And it will only become that, in
my opinion, if it is perceived by other service providers as being egalitarian, as being
fair to all. And so I think in my reservation and note to make to you as you hear
the presentation you're going to hear now, is that the council was set up to look at the
comprehensive needs of the children not just one slice. You're going to hear a slice,
and an important slice. With that note
PINSON: If we could, would the council please come and sit in the reserved seats?
HANSON: Good morning everyone, on behalf of the Sheriff's Department and everyone
in our department, I want to extend our since congratulations to the Children's Services
Council on your first birthday this morning. We are as excited as you are about the
prospects of your communicating to the community the needs of our children, and I think
as Mrs. Cambridge said the community is only going to be as healthy and the quality of
life is only going to be as good as the care we give our children. Paul did ask us to come
Lam �lad at
down and talk today, and/Doug s wi� me. I think I'd rather be in a bar fight than
ant
to be in a room full of ��iiiIict advocates. So if I get a little nervous. . . .I am nervous. . . .
bear with me. I want to talk a little about the history of the information that we're
going to be giving you . A couple of years ago Dan, Don Hunter who then thought he
was really working for a living asked Doug and I to visit some other counties and explore
4
Page 17
what they were doing in terms of innovative techniques for career criminal fall-throughs
.. and tracking, and juvenile tracking. Juvenile delinquency and habitual offender type
tracking. We went out and looked. . .and Doug is a very careful driver. . .never breaks
the speed limit, so we had lots of hours to expand the dialogue, talking with each other.
We think that we came up with some innovative ideas on the whole thing, and we found
that none of the other counties that we visited. . .agencies that we visited were linking
the two.And we thought that there really is an apparent link between the two. . . .between
the habitual offenders as juveniles. . . .and how they go on to become career criminals,
and the impact that they have on the quality of life of people in our community.
So we spent a lot of hours talking and came back, and we got a telephone call from
Larry Raab of HRS who said "hey, I think it's a good idea if you start a Juvenile
Justice Task Force". We said yeah it'd be great. . .a great forum and a great system for
us to exchange our views and see if we can develop some things. So really the product
of what you're going to see today is the product of that Juvenile Justice Tax Force.
The school system, Dr. Morris is represented on that, Larry Raab, and many citizens
who are child advocates are working on that. We may not appear so, but Doug and I
are just as mu. h child advocates as the rest of you. I've been with the Sheriff's
Department for 14 years, all in the juvenile division, so I am a believer in kids as
0 well. What we need to do is give ourselves a little perspective on juvenile crime,
and try to give us a working base. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Preveni
Federal office, says that 40% basically, give or take, 30% in rural areas, and almost 50%
in cities and 20%/i°s allcrimesjuveniles, and as Bea mentioned they only represent
about 25% of our population. So we say "gee, 25% of our population is doing almost
40% of our crime.- When we break that down, and we have to break it down to the age
who has the ability to commit a crime, from 9 to 18, very few children under 9 are
committing crimes. So we find when we break this in half, that roughly 13% of
our population is doing almost 40% of our crime. That's terrible. We break it down even
further when we study these particular kids . . .we found that 3 to 5% of these kids were
doing 80 to 90% of these crimes. In other words, it is the same kids over and over again
who are doing the crimes. The criminal justice system is nothing but a revolving door
for these kids. . . .there's no comprehensive treatment . . .there's no real meaningful
consequences . . .there's nothing in place that's going to change these children's
behavior. These children accumulate anywhere from 20, 30, to 40 arrests in their young
juvenile careers. So we broke it down and tried to look at it further. . . .and said
"gee, who are these kids"? Who are these kids who are our repeat offenders?
And we found that 65% of these children are never rearrested so perhaps we'd
say "well gee the recidivism rate is only 35% and that's not too bad". We broke it down
even further and of the 35% that were left, about half were arrested one or two more
times. Then the remaining kids were the ones who became your habitual offenders.
Page 18
About 15% are the children who go on to be your habitual offenders. And we said,
well what's the difference between this group and this group? Well, the main reason
that this group of children were not brought back into the system was because they
came from fairly functional families. They had moms or dads, or both parents, who
basically cared. This other group of kids came from dysfunctional families. . . .children
of divorce. . .single parents children of neglect, abuse, alcoholic and drug
using families, and parents who were just not invoved in their children's lives.
There was no support base or anything to makes these children want to change their
behavior. A few hours of treatment over here. . .and a few hours over here. . . .
are not effective in changing these children's behavior. We think that there's where
the challenge which lies before us is. What we want you to do today is have you
meet some of those kids. . .this is a short video. . .about 11 minutes . . .and it has half
a dozen of these habitual offenders. They're going to be talking about themselves,
how they got into what they're doing, and there will be a brief history about their
criminal activity. I think there is a point to remember about these kids JJDP
says that 99% of these kids will grow up to be adult career criminals. These are
the people who are menacing and terrorizing our community, and yet these kids
don't really have a chance to change. So when Paul asked us to come down, this
0 is the challenge we'd like to present to the Children's Services Council. I'd like for
you to view these kids, check out their values, their morals, whether or not they
have a conscience, how they view themselves as members of society, and it's going to
be pretty enlightening.
(11 minute video viewing)
alcoholic
HANSON: Curtis was from a single/mother. . .had no guidance nothing to go home
to was victim of abuse. Obviously we're a little late with Curtis. He's been
to 25 years, he'll go in under the Youthful Offender's Act . . .will probably serve 3
or 4 years. . . .and come out . . .he's already chosen Collier County as where he wants
to live . . .he'll come out fixed, healthy, and ready to join the mainstream of society.
Right?
NICHOLS: Wrong. Good morning. It is a pleasure to talk to you. Unfortunately
what we want to talk to you about isn't so pleasurable, but we feel that it is important.
The reality of the matter is, unfortunately experience tells us that Curtis Lee Wright
Cis going to come back just as broken as the day he went into prison. He's going to
come back as a predator, with no conscience, and a bad attitude. He is going to come
back as an occupational felon. . . .as a giver. . . .not a taker and what's worse, he won't
be alone. Jim has already told you that we know generally speaking, that about 98 to 99%
Page 19
of the serious juvenile offenders . . . .the Curtis Lee Wrights, the Richey Waltons, and
the Avery Hartley's of this world, go on to become adult career criminals it is a
fact of life. These adult career criminals are the 5% of our criminal population
who we know are committing the majority of our crimes. It's interesting that the percentage
of adult career criminals . . . .that are the worst of the worst coincidentally is the
same percentage of serious juvenile offenders as a whole who have committed a majority
of the crimes. Every one of these youths that we lose, from this point to that point,
and everyone who crosses this threshold into adult career criminals, carried a heavy
toll on us as citizens as taxpayers, and service providers. The impact of the situation
can be seen clearly, thanks to a Rand study which was done in the early 1980's. The
Rand Corporation in conjunction with the National Institute of Justice did a study
. . .and inthat, they discovered a career criminal, a hard-core career criminal,
is responsible for about from 187 to 287 crimes per year. Now we can safely and
confidently round that off to about 200 crimes a year when you consider that in the study
they found that a small element of this 5% might actually be responsible for upwards of
1000 crimes per year. To put this in perspective, the Rand Corporation went one step
further to put a price tag on an average crime, and they figured that an average crime
0 anywhere it may be committed, is worth about $2,300 in average loss. Now you might
think that's high because a stolen bicycle doesn't cost that much, and so forth.
But you have to look at the big picture. There are a lot of costs we don't see.
No. 1 - the insurance loss. The loss the company takes - the added premium you
have to pay - the loss to our community in terms of our tax dollars going to
enforcement - the conviction of this person - the investigation - the apprehension -
the detainment - and the prosecution of this individual. All carry a heavy toll.
So according to this formula, we can take 200 crimes a year at an average of
cost of $2300 per crime - that is $460,000 impact on the quality of our lives
by one criminal in one year. $460,000 in losses by one career criminal in one year.
This doesn't take into account the human factor - the pain, suffering, the fear,
mistrust, community unrest, and the loss of life. It is hard to put a dollar value
on that. But this we can qualify. But here's the really scary part - in addition to the
substantial populations of adult career criminals that we already have on the streets,
that we are trying to deal with, there are estimates to say that about sixty serious
habitual juvenile offenders make this transition every year to the big time!
A
They become our new career criminals. In 1988 the Collier County Sheriff's Department
began to use the newly strengthened offender law to more effectively incapacitate
the adult career criminals on this side. Very quickly we realized that to make a program,
or a strategy that would really effectively deal with the career criminal problem in the
long term, we would have to find some way to interrupt the cycle, that creates this
Page 20
career criminal, as much as we possibly could. We realized that to effectively pursue
a group that was compoun�dy ti0 new faces every year, we had to find a particular
point - to focus ourselves on a particular group - that we might have a good chance
of interceding with in turning them around. We selected the second arrest juvenile
offender as this target group - as our target point. We did that because they immediately
follow the 65% who are never going to come back after their first arrest - and they
immediately precede this 35% that are going to come back over and over again.
Right here we have a chance at them. After selecting the target group which we call
"juveniles at risk" or "JR's" for short, we decided that we needed a systematic way
of getting the whole story on the juvenile. Not just the fragmented pieces that all of
individually in the system happened to know about this kid, but the whole big picture,
and put it into one centralized location where we can follow him. Chapter 39 of
the Florida Statutes actually helps us in this matter. It encourages Florida sheriffs
to create informational systems or files to maintain a data base on at-risk youthful
offenders and juvenile delinquent offenders for the express purpose of using the
information to help prevent this kid from coming back into the system. It is specifically
intended for preventing re-entry into the criminal justice system. I am proud to share with
you today, thanks to a Federal grant which we have been operating under for two
years and going into our third year, thanks to funding from Tallahassee, we are presently
able to track and profile in great detail, this second-arrest offender and in doing
so create, what we call a multi-agency information sheet. The multi-information sheet has
to do with social background, scholastic background, criminal background, and family
background of this individual. It involves whether the kid is involved in substance
abuse, if the family members are, what his family life is like, what his interests are,
how well he's doing in school, where his strong points are, where his weak points
are. When we have this report compiled we want to know, and we hope to be able to
say exactly who John is, and how he got here to the second arrest in the criminal
justice system. This MIS . . . .multi-informational sheet. . . .is intended to be a road map
for a group of system and community professionals to make a comprehensive
strategy rehabilitation program for Johnny that has never been available before. We
want it to be a blueprint for them to decide exactly where we can help him. . .where we
can fill in the blanks to lift him up and prevent him from going any farther, if humanly
possible. We want to give him one good chance, and we know that because of the numbers
involved, we can't involve every kid in this program . . . .but we want to give THIS kid
one good chance of going from bad to better instead of going from bad to worse.
0 So we understand who this person is . . . .we understand who this juvenile is
we now understand what his problems are . . .we now have in our hands a picture of
him such as the system has never seen before. What are we going to do about it?
Page 21
HANSON: And therein lies the gap, and therein lies the challenge to the Children's
Services Council. We think we can tell you who this kid is. . .we can tell you what
his problems are . . .but there's nothing there for him now. There's nothing in
existence that is going to change this kid from this path unless he can do it on his
own. Again, you gotta remember. . .this kid comes from a dysfunctional family . . .
4 that's the key element no support, no values, no meaningful consequences.
For instance the other day I did a presentation to a rehabilitation center and I asked
the kids. "how many of you guys run your families and are in charge at home?
About 80$ of the kids raised their hands. They knew. And therein lies the problem.
We recently went to a seminar - will just briefly relate the story to you. Omar Vendez
was the guest speaker there, who is a Cuban American. He said "when I was 11 years
I lived in Cuba. We had sixty people in our village . . .lived in thatched huts with
dirt floors. . .but I had sixty parents. Everybody in my village cared for me.
We moved to America, both parents started working, I was alone, I was in the streets,
I was out committing crimes". At 13 he was an alcoholic. He remembers puncturing
a tire on a car a few blocks from where he lived, and he saw a man looking out the
Qwindow seeing him doing it. He said "oh my gosh, I'm in trouble now." What did
the fellow do? He closed the window. And that's the kind of caring and the way we
treat our kids now. Do not get involved. Omar took that as a message and continued
his activity , was arrested three or four times, until a Metro-Dade police officer . . .
just happened to be a police officer who was a significant brother in this boy's life.
By the way, speaking of brothers anybody know how many Big Brothers and
Big Sisters we have in this community? None not one. Anyway, it happened to be
a Metro Dach officer who made Omar play on his baseball team, went and picked him
up and brought him to practice. Omar went on to finish high school, went to Florida
State on a baseball scholarship, has a master's degree in psychology. He said the
significant person in his life happened to be a police officer, and said he was going to
dedicate five years of his life to law enforcement. He did 7 years undercover in
Boliva, joined the DEA and did another 6 years in Mexico City, and now he is in
charge in the State of Florida for DEA training. That's just one story. Omar says
he doesn't understand this country . . . .he can't understand why we treat our kids
the way we do, why we can't provide for these kinds of kids. . .which was where he was
at. And therein lies the challenge. We have an idea. It is the creation of a staffing
® board . . . .all those professionals who have sat on this board for two years now.
We have an idea that we think WILL make a difference. We just need an organization
. . .an entity. . .that is willing to undertake this idea and make a difference for these kids.
This is essentially our proposal today. Think about this problem, think of the impact
that it has on our kids and community. Not only do we owe these kids financially. . . .but
Ammo
Page 22
we owe them morally to make a difference. We owe them this chance.
And we're not providing them this chance now. So we'd like for you to entertain
these thoughts and maybe bring is back to talk in more detail later on. But at the
very least, some of you are now aware of these problems. We want to thank you for
your time and attention. We really do.
CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Jim, very much.
The next item of business is to decide on when and where our regular meetings will
be.
PASSIDOMO: Madam chairman, I think Commissioner Saunders made some excellent
points. It seems to me that our meetings, and the way we hold our meetings
say a lot about how this Children's Services Council will become part of our community.
If we use our meetings as an outreach into the community, we could perhaps consider
moving that to different parts of the community and use it to educate this community,
do regular presentations by service providers as to their perception of the needs of
the community, in addition to doing our own needs assessments it may be that
the meetings themselves say as much about the role of this children's services council
Q in this community as anything else. So it seems to me that it may be a good idea for us tc
consider the possibility of putting these meetings on a regular rotating basis to outreach
in different parts of the community to use it as a means to encourage others to participate
in this process as to how often we meet. That's something that we may to discuss
here as well, but I just think the matter of our meetings says an awful lot about this
council.
CHAIRMAN: Thank you, John. How often . . . .once a month?
SHANAHAN: I think monthly meetings would be very important, particularly at this
organizational start-up time. Monthly certainly wouldn't be too much.
CHAIRMAN: Today is the first Friday in the month. Is that appropriate for all the
council members?
SHANAHAN: Friday is a good day for me.
CHAIRMAN: Is everyone agreeable to that? If there are no objections, then
the first Friday of every month.
SHANAHAN: First Friday of every month?
CHAIRMAN: Yes. Until such time as we decide to change it.
RITZ: I'm sorry to interrupt.
CHAIRMAN: Oh sure. I want to introduce . . . .Bob, would you introduce yourself?
RITZ: I'm Bob Ritz. I would like to apologize for being late but I had this scheduled
for LOAM and I intend to go back and shoot the messenger when I get back.
CHAIRMAN: Bob is our representative from HRS and. . . .so we forgive you for being
late, Bob. And I was thinking. . . .you have to come from Fort Myers. Is 10 o'clock
Page 23
a better time for most of us. . .or is 9 o'clock better?
RITZ: 9 is okay.
OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS: 9 is fine.
CHAIRMAN: 9 o'clock then, the first Friday of each month.
SHANAHN: Who's going to be responsible for selecting the location?
CHAIRMAN: Well, what I was thinking when John was talking about that, if it is
agreeable with everyone maybe what we should do is ask Paul to think up locations.
PINSON: I've got some good thoughts.
CHAIRMAN: Dave, did you want to say something?
DAVE ENTING: Thank you, madam chairman. If I could just briefly ask the council
to consider possibly during the first year of operation, consider possibly some meetings
other than early morning or daytime. . .specifically evening meetings. Possibly not
necessarily on a permanent basis, but maybe during your first year in order to assess
whether potentially daytime meetings may not allow certain segments of the population
to hear you and to see you and have an opportunity to participate in the work of the
council. . .primarily the 40 hour work-week people in the community. Thank you very
much.
CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Dave. Well, then if it is agreeable with the council, perhaps
we should just let Paul work out a schedule and present it at the next board meeting
as to locations and how we will alternate go from place to place. If we set up
a schedule permanently, then the people in Golden Gate, North Naples, downtown
Naples or whatever, could have it as a permanent schedule.
SHANAHAN: Certainly Dave's idea of an occasional meeting at night would be in good
order to give people an opportunity to participate. There's always been criticism
of certain meetings that take place during the work-day and people who are unable to
get there so it's certainly something that we ought to very seriously consider.
CHAIRMAN: I agree, because if we are going to get the families involved, we need
that communication with them. Then should we take a vote on the first Friday
of every month?
SHANAHAN: You did.
CHAIRMAN: Bob, we were going to have you give us an update on Lee County's
Children's Services Council.
RITZ: Right. As most of you probably know on September 12th the Lee County
Board of Commissioners unanimously approved the establishment of the Lee County
Children's Services Council. It was a public hearing, and I must admit that hearing
was packed. . .there were people in the balconies . . .you couldn't get a seat. . . .it
was standing room only. There was a tremendous amount of support for the council
in Lee County. Right now we are in the process of identifying a steering committee
for the council, identifying the five members at large, to present to the Commissioner
Manning and the Lee County Commission. We're going to have a retreat on the 14th
p.
Page .24
starting at LOAM which is Sunday, and we'll go on to as how long as it will go to map
out our plan for the campaign for the referendum. The council was approved and
we agreed that we would not go to the public for referendum for the special taxing
district until next year. At this retreat we hope to have a plan mapped1°strrategys,
etc. and go forward in the fall of next year.
SHANAHAN: That means you're going to have a special referendum?
RITZ: Yes.
CHAIRMAN: Rather than to wait until 1992, is what you're saying?
SHANAHAN: What kind of cost is associated with that kind of special referendum?
RITZ: I don't know at this point. We should have a much better feel of that
after the meeting on the 14th. We would like to invite some of the folks here to
come to that meeting, if you'd like. It will be at the HRS Office in Fort Myers
on College Parkway and we start at LOAM.
CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Are there any other comments or anything else?
RICHEY: Yes, Madam Chairman, I'd like to know about the needs assessment. . . .
what are the time lines this council would like to establish for it? I think that
is going to be predicated on the dollars. . . .availability of funds. . . .and does the
council wish to have a Request for Proposal developed and approved by this
council, prior to dissemination? It's easy to say "you're assigned the needs
ilia assessment". . . .there's a lot involved in this and I want to make sure that I am
following the wishes of the council as we look to the needs assessment because
the integrity of it and the validity of it are absolute essential if it's going to
meet the needs of the community. So I know that Paul's already spent some time
on it in discussion but how do you wish to
,11 CHAIRMAN: Well, Paul has really been our acting Director.
RICHEY: What is the time line, I think. . .
PINSON: Tom, let me give you an answer by way of saying that the two members
of the audience representing the Community Foundation are here today partaking
of this meeting. The Community Foundation is the organization that has not agreed. . .
but has expressed a strong desire to be the supporting organization for that
$35,000 study. Obviously the needs assessment cannot be done without funds.
First, John, if you don't mind . . . .when is your first organizational meeting, now.
NAGEL: Well, the next board meeting is October 16th. There are just two or three
or us, as you know who have been very much interested from the beginning, in
all of this, but there are a number of members of the Board who just don't know anything
about it, so we're going to have to start from scratch.
PINSON: Let me say, if for any reason the Community Foundation does not, or is not
able to participate in the funding for this particular assessment there is a back-up
foundation that has agreed. . . .we have a letter in writing. . .who has agreed in principle
1111111111111111.11.11111111.111.1111111. 6/# 14 lig
PAGE 25
oil to be the sole supporter for this needs assessment. So I think it behoves the council
Ili to give the first shot to the Community Foundation . . . .they expressed the first desire to
be involved. If they're saying their first organizational meeting is on the 16th, I think
that points you in a time line direction right there. I think it would be appropriate
for perhaps myself to follow up with the Community Foundation's meeting and to have
a presentation for this council at your next meeting in regards to what the proceeds
are.
FAERBER: Do we want to do as a Board, again to preserve the integrity of the study,
send out Request for Proposals?
PINSON: I don't think there's any question . . . .I think you have to do that.
I think you need, as a public body, to go through that entire process. And
irrespective of the fact that I have researched three or four Universities including
one local consulting firm, who is very eager to participate, I think the process needs to
be above board, out in the public, and RFP's are called for.
NAGEL: To follow up on what happens at our October 16th meeting, I think it would be
very important if you could get as much as possible, in specific terms, to the board
as to this needs assessment, because there are going to be members of the board who
will say "well, you know, who needs to study the needs. . .we know we have needs.
IDLet's go to work". . . . .and that sort of thing and that's understandable. So as much
as you can do to give us specifics on who might do it, and what kind of proposition
you're going to get from them to give to us or anybody else by the 16th.
PINSON: Might I suggest, then, if the council agrees that I be present at your
board meeting. . .making a presentation to your board?
BROUSSEAU: I'd request a presentation to this board because I echo his feelings.
I'm shocked that we can't figure out our own needs and that we're going to spend
$40,000 to be spent on our needs to have another study done. I happen to be a
member of the public, that I understand there's a few of out there, that everytime
I read in the paper where I see that $80,000 is spent on a study that everybody
knows what we need. . . .that I'm shocked but I would defer to those professionals
here that have been this is my first time on a board. . . .that finds itself in
this position. Maybe it's a way of life legally or something. . .and it needs to be done,
but I need to be convinced on it.
PASSIDOMO: It seems to me that we have to validate the process and that we've got
to show what the needs are and we have to prioritize those needs. As Dr. Richey said
earlier. . .before we can establish what, in fact, are our goals and objectives. . . .we have
( to get some sense of what those priorities are and how we interpret those priorities.
And as we go throught he process, the idea of accountability is essential to the
viability of this council. So the RFP process, whenever we are expending funds,
whether they be privately donated funds or public funds, it seems to me that we gotta
Page _ •26
{ always go through the RFP process. There are models out there. . .Hillsborough
County and more recently Palm Beach County, have gone through the RFP
for a needs assessment. I don't think we have reinvent the wheel and perhaps
if Dr. Richey and his committee could come back to this council with a draft of an
RFP, we could get some idea of how we want to define the roll of that needs
assessment.
CHAIRMAN: Yes, Mary Ellen?
zum FELDE: I think that probably it is very necessary. I think that often times
there tends to be a struggle between those agencies or those interests who see
the ah I call it "crisis". . .see the end result. We just have a presentation by
two gentlemen who deal constantly with the end result of what happens, and there
tends to be. . .certainly that's the most immediate thing that you want to attack and
do something and put money and put energies behind. And as I mentioned before,
the hard thing to measure . . . .the hard thing to say that needs some work on. . .
is prevention. You know Prevention . . . .and agencies that you can't measure
. . .those are the things. . . .and I feel that if we are the children's services
council. . .we need to really decide what it is that we are going to address and
prioritize them because the crisis end of it tends to bring the most attention. . .
that is where generally the most money and attention gets put on.
BROUSSEAU: I don't disagree with that. My fear is. . .and again, I haven't
been there to see. . .except through the press. . .but it seems to me that at
this point we ask a university to come in . . . .a university with university
standards and their ideals and all the subjectives that they have. . .come in,
does a study of our communit y and so we've got an outsider doing a study
of our community imputing their feelings and thoughts and emotions into it. . . .
and now we come back and we have done one or two things . . . .we've either
passed the buck and we may come back in and they say "here's what you need
to do" and then we say "okay, we do what they think we should do" or
we find ourselves in the position of sitting here saying "sorry, they've misinterpreted
our community this is alright" and the next thing you know is the public saying
"board votes against what their experts, what they just paid $40,000, recommends"
It seems to me that I'm selling myself short to turn over that much power to
them to come back and influence us. I don't know. . .someone who's been there. .
tell me about studies . . . .and is that not where you find yourself?
SHANAHAN: You find yourself in that kind of a predicament in almost every study
and survey that you do and that you pay for. There's always criticism out there.
Somebody always says "you didn't need to do that you knew what the problem was
all along" but you do need that professional judgment and that outside judgment.
Page 27
I believe, to assess what the real needs are. I don't think we know what the real needs
are at this point in time. And the county commission has clearly . . .the clear direction
from the county commission was a "needs assessment" so I think we're obligated
to do that whether it is $40,000 or $35,000 or whatever the number turns out to
be. . .we need a good professional, objective review of what the needs assessments
are. And we should fully understand before going in that there will be some criticism
of the very fact that we're going to spend $40,000. Lee County will be severely
criticized for spending $200,000 for a special election, and as a result will lose some
votes in the transition. So all those things you have to measure. . . .measure the
validity of a needs assessment. . . .frankly, we could probably put together a needs
assessment right here in this group,but I don't think it would have the validity
that an outside organization would.
RICHEY: Judge Brousseau, I think the problem that I see . . .certainly this body
along with the expert resources we have in the communitycould put together a
needs assessment. The problem is "who do you sample" "how do you sample"
how do you collect your data. . .how do you interpret that data how do you put
it into some meaningful, agreeable report? You know, in terms of a ( )
study? There are just a lot of things that your university based research
groups or your foundations who specialize in this can do in terms of
sampling the population. I would not want the task of trying to sample Collier County
in terms of a needs assessment because I might not look to a particular target
population. I might overlook it. We might. . .the council might overlook it. Do you
do a written survey. . . .do you do a descriptive study do you do an analysis
of community groups? You know there are a lot of really important factors to
consider. It bothers me to spend the money also, but I don't think we have the
time nor the staff nor the resources to generate a report back which this council
could make an objective assessment of our mission and purpose and our goals.
I think it is important that we have that study or that needs assessment.
Certainly we could do it internally but I don't think it would have the validation
or reliability that we need for such an undertaking. It is my belief that when we
go to the community and inform them of what the needs assessment indicates,
and establish the priorities, then we're all working from the same page. There are
no special interests , and there are no biases, but it is in fact what you see.
So that is where I am coming from. I'm not certainly one who wants an organization
to spend $35,000 or $40,000 . . . .if they've got an extra $35 or $40,000 send it to the
school system. . .we can use it right now, but you know
Page 28
CHAIRMAN: Yes, Dave?
DAVE URICH: I'm Dave Urich from Youth Haven. I think you should also think of
this as an "unmet" needs assessment. The resources. . .what do we have out there.
In this county we have breaks in the continuum of services, and that's part of
what I think you should be identifying. That's what is going to cost some of the money.
Because if we are going to intercede with the second arrest children, we need to have
a program and service of therapeutic foster homes, and so on, where we can change
the mold that they're in.
CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Dave.
PINSON: And as a final addendum or perhaps a semi-final addendum . . . .a comprehensive
needs assessment in the way that the council should ask for one. . .should show
potential sources of funding. I don't think it is a given that you necessarily have
to go yet to the polls. I think we all know that the needs are high and there
doesn't seem to be any other obvious choices to the tune of several million dollars
per year other than the special taxation district, but there could be other creative
alternatives. I think one of the answers of a comprehensive needs assessment will
be. . . .are there in fact. . . .other avenues of funding.
SHANAHAN: Now where are we, Madam Chairman?
CHAIRMAN: I don't know, I'm just trying to figure that out.
FAERBER: Well, I think what we have to do is to direct Dr. Richey to draw up an
RFP and then we can debate the RFP here as a body.
CHAIRMAN: I believe that's where we have to go.
FAERBER: Whenever, he may not be able to do that
RICHEY: I can't do that in this short a time, but I'll get it to you as soon as
I want to sample some other successful RFPs in the state if we could get
Paul to help us on that. . . .we can begin to track what they did and what's
more important. . . .what they discovered. It would answer Judge Brousseau's
concern. . . .what they did not get in that survey what they felt was essential
. . .and I think that would help alleviate his concerns.
(There may be a missing section of the meeting here, for the next
voice is that of Judge Brousseau and it is about something different)
Page 29
BROUSSEAU: The legislature created what a "volunteer judicial review panel"
in dependency, which is children that are dependent upon the state for their survival
or health. If they are put into foster care, then the law requires every six months
basically, the court to review, their placement and decide whether it is still appropriate
or different placement is needed or returned to the family. Traditionally, through most
governmental resources which are taxed to their fullest . . . .courts are too. . .we spend. . .
I spend about 5 minutes unfortunately on most of these families. . .which HRS to
their credit and Guardian ad Litem, and other people spend hours putting together a
report. . .I guess 5 minutes isn't fair. . .I spend probably half hour on each case
READING the reports. . .5 minutes in court actually holding the hearing. The wisdom
of the legislature created these volunteer judicial review panels to have volunteers
from the community formed into panels that would take the place of what I'm doing
now. . . .listen on these periodic review. . . .do the review. . .make recommendations
and then if those recommendations, which generally are from my experience accepted,
and worked out among the parties. . .then just come to the court for approval.
Those that are challenged, of course, would come back to the court for the final
decision. They anticipate that each review would be about an hour long versus
five minutes, and by a panel of collective minds rather one that may be a little
stressed out in burnout sometimes. I view this with a lot of excitement and
October 1 is when it became available, and I wondered if the council might assist
me in getting together the review panels. I don't know what the mechanism
would be. . .just whether to inform me in selecting. . .or advertising. . .or if you
think this is something you'd want to get into. The sooner the better, from my
point of view.
CHAIRMAN: This cannot be done under the Judiciary Department.
BROUSSEAU: Oh yeah, I can go out tomorrow and put a press release out
and just do it on my own. I am inviting you, if you feel like it, to assist . . .
if you want to. . .if you don't, I'll go out and do it.
FAERBER: This would be putting together the right people from the right
areas.
PASSIDOMO: I think what Judge Brousseau is giving us is an opportunity just
like the staffing board is an opportunity to show something positive under the mantle
of this council. This can be done through other vehicles, but this may be an
opportunity for us not to expend any private or public funds, but to do something
positive and show that we can establish our own track record. It seems to me that
it should be an opportunity that we should pursue. Judge, perhaps if you would
develop a model with your own recommendations as to how it may operate, and come
back at our next meeting with a presentation of that model so that we could
gy
Page 30
fully endorse it, it seems to me that it would be something we'd want to pursue.
CHAIRMAN: I think one of the things I'd like to see. . . .and you know when we
first started off on this, we had hoped that we would be on the referendum this
November and it just seemed that we ran into more and more roadblocks. The more
that we got into it, the more that I am convinced, that the man upstairs was guiding
us because I really feel so strongly that we've got to spend this year or year and a
half or whatever, educating the community and to also build up our credibility. . .
that we indeed are a council who are committed to children and that we are doing
things without money to help with the problems in our community. So I see this,
and I also saw the opportunity that we have in the staffing board to help with
the problems. I think it is great and I think these are things we can do . . .
and if other people have ideas that the Children's Services Council can put in
effect which don't cost any money, just take committment. . .l think we should say
"go for it".
FAERBER: Madam Chairman, I have to excuse myself. I have a trial with
this gentleman he can be late, but I can't.
CHAIRMAN: It is agreeable then, Judge Brousseau, that you'll bring this back
to the council.
SHANAHAN: Does that give you enough time?
BROUSSEAU: Yes, and I will welcome anyone from the community or board who
will contact me in the meantime, and if you have any thoughts for implementation.
CHAIRMAN: Are there any other comments. . . .oh. . .Bob
RITZ: Just one clarification on the status of Lee County. In Lee County it is the
steering committee the council has not yet been appointed. So, when we talk
about a referendum, it is the steering committee that's wanting to push for a
referendum. . .and whether the council goes along with that will be determined.
SHANAHAN: They may be much smarter than that.
RITZ: Just wanted to make that point.
CHAIRMAN: Are there any other comments from the community?
Dave?
DAVE ENTING: One important point, I think, not brought out in the discussion,
on the needs assessment study, is that although it tends to say to a certain extent,
"we don't know very much,' which of course, is not true or you wouldn't be here
if that were the case. YOU're here because you know of problems but I think it
lays the groundwork for community support when you ask for funding a year and
• a half from now. One of the critical, very significant advantages of the needs assessment
study is to allow the community at large an opportunity to speak and be heard
in the formulation of your mission statements and the formulation of your programs.
•
Page 31
.141110 So many times organizations get feed-back and a round support of the community
at large, is not so much because what they are doing isn't necessarily in total
agreement but because the community didn't have an opportunity to speak . . . .in
this case. . .the council. . .to . . .for the people to know that you have heard
their perceptions, their expressions of need. So I think one of the very significant
advantages and benefits of the council that will come out of this needs assessment
study, is to really work closely on the front end with the community at large
with a process that allows them to participate.
CHAIRMAN: Thank you Dave. Jeanne?
BOOKER: This is so obvious and yet no-one has said it. I think it is a tremendous
opportunity when we look just at the council itself and that this is a historic meeting
in that we have a county commissioner, a city council member, superintendent of
schools, we have a judge, we have community here. . . .and the potential within
the membership of this council itself is probably its greatest strength. I just
want to express my wish that this kind of cooperative council . . . .the first in
Collier County. . .in a public body. . . .and the opportunity for communication between
those of you who really have a tremendous administrative responsibility for children's
services and the HRS Director. . .but this in itself, the formation of the council,
/CI
and its membership is the strength. While I agree that the community input is
very important, but I think the strength of this council can bring to meeting the
needs of children . . .is just unpredictable at this time, but I hope in a year. . .
that this kind of cooperative communication b etween the agencies represented on
this council and community advocates which is certainly represented here. . .
that it goes well for the future of the children of Collier County.
CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Jeanne. Anyone else?
CHAIRMAN: May I then have a motion that we adjourn?
SHANAHAN: Make a motion to adjourn.
ZUM FELDE: Second.
UNANIMOUS AYE:
ADJOURNED