Agenda 07/12/2016 Item #16A 2 7/12/2016 16.A.2.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve an easement agreement for the purchase of a road right-of-way, drainage,
and utility easement (Parcel 391RDUE) required for the expansion of Golden Gate Boulevard from
20th Street East to east of Everglades Boulevard (Project 60145). Estimated Fiscal Impact: $302,527.
OBJECTIVE: To purchase an easement needed for the four-laning of Golden Gate Boulevard from 20th
Street East to east of Everglades Boulevard(the Project).
CONSIDERATIONS: Collier County is seeking to purchase Parcel 391RDUE, a perpetual, non-exclusive
road right-of-way, drainage, and utility easement needed for construction of the Project. This easement is
approximately 54,401 square feet(1.25 acres) in extent and located in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict at
the northeast corner of Golden Gate Blvd and Everglades Blvd. It is situated along both road frontages of Big
Bear Plaza CPUD, a commercially zoned parent tract owned by Norman L. and Joanne Taylor and Richard A.
and Carolyn A. Faust.
The appraisal prepared by Cardo Appraisal Group, LLC., on February 5, 2016, estimates the value of Parcel
391RDUE at $189,000. The attached easement agreement for $295,000 plus the construction of a paved
driveway entrance and culvert on Golden Gate Blvd as part of construction of the Project is the culmination of
amicable negotiations with the owner. If Parcel 391RDUE is not acquired by negotiation, it will have to be
condemned and the County will be liable for inflated costs of owner's attorney, appraisal, and other expert
fees as well as inflated commercial severance damages. Such costs could far exceed the difference between
the appraised value and the negotiated settlement price.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of$295,027, being the aggregate purchase price of$295,000 and
recording fees of$27, will be required. Additionally, the paved driveway entrance and culvert to be built as
part of the overall construction project will cost approximately $7,500. The primary funding source for the
acquisition of right-of-way is impact fees. Should impact fees not be sufficient within a particular project,the
secondary funding source will be gas taxes.
Incremental maintenance costs for Golden Gate Boulevard from 20th Street East to east of Everglades
Boulevard are estimated at $3,000 per year for mowing and garbage removal. The cost to maintain
stormwater management infrastructure will be approximately $5,000 on a three to five year basis. New
roadway construction has a maintenance curve of approximately five to seven years before any incremental
costs are required for repairs.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires a
majority vote for Board approval. -ERP
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This recommendation is consistent with the Long Range
Transportation Plan and the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. To approve the attached easement agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute same on behalf of the
Board;
2. To accept the conveyance of Parcel No. 391RDUE and authorize the County Manager, or his designee,to
record the conveyance instrument in the public records of Collier County, Florida;
3. To authorize the payment of all costs and expenses that Collier County is required to pay under the terms
of the easement agreement to close the transaction;
4. To authorize the County Manager or his designee to take the necessary measures to ensure the County's
performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of the easement agreement; and
Packet Page-144-
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
5. To authorize any, and all, budget amendments that may be required to carry out the collective will of the
Board.
Prepared By: Karen Dancsec, Property Acquisition Specialist, ROW, Transportation Engineering Division,
Growth Management Department
Attachments:
1)Easement Agreement with Exhibit A
2)Location Map
3)Appraisal Report dated February 5, 2016, due to its size accessible at:
http://apps3.co1liergov.net/agenda/ftp/20l 6BCCMeetinas/AgendaJuly 1216/GrowthMgmt/391 RDUE Report
.pdf
Packet Page-145-
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.16.A.16.A.2.
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve an easement agreement for the purchase
of a road right-of-way, drainage, and utility easement (Parcel 391RDUE) required for the
expansion of Golden Gate Boulevard from 20th Street East to east of Everglades Boulevard
(Project 60145). Estimated Fiscal Impact: $302,527.
Meeting Date: 7/12/2016
Prepared By
Name: DancsecKaren
Title: Property Acquisition Specialist,Transportation Engineering&Construction Management
6/2/2016 1:52:07 PM
Submitted by
Title: Property Acquisition Specialist,Transportation Engineering&Construction Management
Name: DancsecKaren
6/2/2016 1:52:08 PM
Approved By
Name: PutaansuuGary
Title: Project Manager,Principal,Transportation Road Maintenance
Date: 6/7/2016 5:29:41 PM
Name: AhmadJay
Title: Division Director-Transportation Eng, Transportation Engineering&Construction Management
Date: 6/9/2016 12:04:10 PM
Name: TaylorLisa
Title: Management/Budget Analyst, Senior, Capital Construction&Maintenance Budget/Fiscal
Date: 6/10/2016 2:07:57 PM
Name: GossardTravis
Title:Division Director-Road Maintenance,Road Maintenance
Date: 6/13/2016 4:00:39 PM
Packet Page-146-
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
Name: HendricksKevin
Title: Manager-Right of Way, Transportation Engineering&Construction Management
Date: 6/13/2016 4:12:41 PM
Name: ShueGene
Title:Division Director-Operations Support, Growth Management Department
Date: 6/13/2016 5:51:23 PM
Name: KearnsAllison
Title: Manager-Financial&Operational Sprt, Capital Construction&Maintenance Budget/Fiscal
Date: 6/14/2016 1:28:05 PM
Name: MarcellaJeanne
Title: Executive Secretary, Transportation Administration
Date: 6/17/2016 11:26:05 AM
Name: PepinEmily
Title:Assistant County Attorney, CAO Litigation
Date: 6/17/2016 2:07:53 PM
Name: UsherSusan
Title: Management/Budget Analyst, Senior, Office of Management&Budget
Date: 6/20/2016 9:15:29 AM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 6/21/2016 4:44:11 PM
Name: CasalanguidaNick
Title:Deputy County Manager, County Managers Office
Date: 7/1/2016 1:17:21 PM
Packet Page -147-
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
PROJECT: 60145 — Golden Gate Blvd East
PARCEL No(s): 391RDUE
FOLIO No(s): 40680040000
EASEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is made
and entered into on this day of , 2016, by and between NORMAN
L. and JOANNE TAYLOR, husband and wife, and RICHARD A. and CAROLYN A.
FAUST, husband and wife, whose mailing address is 4651 West Blvd, Naples, Florida
34103-3056 (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), and COLLIER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3299 Tamiami Trail East, do the
Office of the County Attorney, Suite 800, Naples, Florida 34112 (hereinafter referred to as
"County").
WHEREAS, County requires a perpetual, non-exclusive road right-of-way, drainage,
and utility easementover, under, upon and across the lands described in Exhibit "A", which is
attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the
"Easement"); and
WHEREAS, Owner desires to convey the Easement to County for the stated purposes,
on the terms and conditions set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, County has agreed to compensate Owner for conveyance of the
Easement.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, the sum of Ten Dollars
($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby mutually acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
1. RECITALS - All of the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby expressly
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth fully below, and all Exhibits referenced
herein are made a part of this Agreement.
2. PURCHASE PRICE - Owner shall convey the Easement to County for the sum of:
$295,000.00
subject to the apportionment and distribution of proceeds pursuant to Paragraph 9 of
this Agreement (said transaction hereinafter referred to as the "Closing"). Said payment
to Owner, payable by County Warrant or funds wire transfer, shall be full compensation
for the Easement conveyed, including (if applicable) all landscaping, trees, shrubs,
improvements, and fixtures located thereon, and shall be in full and final settlement of
any damages resulting to Owner's remaining lands, costs to cure, including but not
limited to the cost to relocate the existing irrigation system and other improvements (if
any), and the cost to cut and cap irrigation lines (if any) extending into the Easement,
and to remove all sprinkler valves and related electrical wiring (if any), and all other
damages in connection with conveyance of said Easement to County, including all
attorneys' fees, expert witness fees and costs as provided for in Chapter 73, Florida
Statutes.
Packet Page -148-
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
Page 2
3. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS — County will install one paved driveway entrance and
culvert, on Golden Gate Boulevard sufficient for commercial access in accordance with
the Collier County Land Development Code at time of the roadway construction. The
location of said driveway culvert will be as determined on the Big Bear Plaza CPUD
Master Plan — Exhibit A, attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
4. CLOSING DOCUMENTS AND CLEAR TITLE - Owner shall obtain from the holders of
any liens, exceptions and/or qualifications encumbering the Easement, the execution of
such instruments which will remove, release or subordinate such encumbrances from
the Easement upon their recording in the public records of Collier County, Florida. Prior
to Closing and as soon after the execution of this Agreement as is possible, Owner shall
provide County with a copy of any existing title insurance policy and the following
documents and instruments properly executed, witnessed, and notarized where
required, in a form acceptable to County (hereinafter referred to as "Closing
Documents"):
(a) Easement;
(b) Instruments required to remove, release or subordinate any and all liens,
exceptions and/or qualifications affecting County's enjoyment of the Easement;
(c) Closing Statement;
(d) Grantor's Non-Foreign, Taxpayer Identification and "Gap" Affidavit;
(e) W-9 Form; and
(f) Such evidence of authority and capacity of Owner and its representatives to
execute and deliver this agreement and all other documents required to
consummate this transaction, as reasonably determined by County, County's
counsel and/or title company.
5. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - Both Owner and County agree that time is of the
essence. Therefore, Closing shall occur within ninety (90) days of the date of execution
of this Agreement or within thirty (30) days of County's receipt of all Closing Documents,
whichever is the later. This agreement shall remain in full force and effect until Closing
shall occur, until and unless it is terminated for other cause. At Closing, payment shall
be made to Owner in that amount shown on the Closing Statement as "Net Cash to the
Seller."
6. IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS - Owner agrees to
relocate any existing irrigation system located on the Easement including irrigation lines,
electrical wiring and sprinkler valves, etc. (if any), prior to the construction of the project
without any further notification from County. Owner assumes full responsibility for the
relocation of the irrigation system (if any) on the remainder property and its performance
after relocation. Owner holds County harmless for any and all possible damage to the
irrigation system in the event owner fails to relocate the irrigation system prior to
construction of the project.
Packet Page-149-
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
Page 3
If Owner elects to retain improvements and/or landscaping ("Improvements") located on
the Easement (if any), Owner is responsible for their retrieval prior to the construction of
the project without any further notification from County. Owner acknowledges that
County has compensated Owner for the value of all improvements located within the
Easement area, and yet County is willing to permit Owner to salvage said improvements
as long as their retrieval is performed before construction and without interruption or
inconvenience to the County's contractor. All improvements not removed from the
Easement prior to commencement of construction of the project shall be deemed
abandoned by Owner.
This provision shall survive Closing and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title.
7. MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS - Owner and County agree to do all things which
may be required to give effect to this Agreement immediately as such requirement is
made known to them or they are requested to do so, whichever is the earlier.
8. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES - Owner agrees, represents and warrants
the following:
(a) Owner has full right, power and authority to own and operate the property
underlying the Easement, to enter into and to execute this Agreement, to
execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this Agreement and the
instruments executed in connection herewith, to undertake all actions and to
perform all tasks required of Owner hereunder and to consummate the
transaction contemplated hereby.
(b) County's acceptance of the Easement shall not be deemed to be full
performance and discharge of every agreement and obligation on the part of
Owner to be performed pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
(c) No party or person other than County has any right or option to acquire the
Easement or any portion thereof.
(d) Until the date fixed for Closing, so long as this Agreement remains in force and
effect, Owner shall not encumber or convey any portion of the property
underlying the Easement or any rights therein, nor enter into any agreements
granting any person or entity any rights with respect to the Easement, without
first obtaining the written consent of County to such conveyance, encumbrance,
or agreement, which consent may be withheld by County for any reason
whatsoever.
(e) There are no maintenance, construction, advertising, management, leasing,
employment, service or other contracts affecting the Easement.
(f) Owner has no knowledge that there are any suits, actions or arbitration,
administrative or other proceedings or governmental investigations or
requirements, formal or informal, existing or pending or threatened which affect
the Easement or which adversely affect Owner's ability to perform hereunder;
nor is there any other charge or expense upon or related to the Easement
which has not been disclosed to County in writing prior to the effective date of
this Agreement.
Packet Page-150- CAO
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
Page 4
(g) County is entering into this Agreement based upon Owner's representations
stated in this Agreement and on the understanding that Owner will not cause
the physical condition of the property underlying the Easement to change from
its existing state on the effective date of this Agreement up to and including the
date of Closing. Therefore, Owner agrees not to enter into any contracts or
agreements pertaining to or affecting the property underlying the Easement and
not to do any act or omit to perform any act which would adversely affect the
physical condition of the property underlying the Easement or its intended use
by County.
(h) The property underlying the Easement, and all uses of the said property, have
been and presently are in compliance with all Federal, State and Local
environmental laws; that no hazardous substances have been generated,
stored, treated or transferred on the property underlying the Easement except
as specifically disclosed to the County; that the Owner has no knowledge of any
spill or environmental law violation on the property contiguous to or in the
vicinity of the Easement to be sold to the County, that the Owner has not
received notice and otherwise has no knowledge of: a) any spill on the property
underlying the Easement; b) any existing or threatened environmental lien
against the property underlying the Easement; or c) any lawsuit, proceeding or
investigation regarding the generation, storage, treatment, spill or transfer of
hazardous substances on the property underlying the Easement. This provision
shall survive Closing and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title.
9. INDEMNIFICATION - Owner shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the
County against and from, and reimburse the County with respect to, any and all
damages, claims, liabilities, laws, costs and expenses (including without limitation
reasonable paralegal and attorney fees and expenses whether in court, out of court, in
bankruptcy or administrative proceedings or on appeal), penalties or fines incurred by or
asserted against the County by reason or arising out of the breach of any of Owner's
representations under paragraph 7(h). This provision shall survive Closing and is not
deemed satisfied by conveyance of title.
10. CURATIVE INSTRUMENTS, PROCESSING FEES, TAXES - County shall pay all fees
to record any curative instruments required to clear title, and all Easement instrument
recording fees. In addition, County may elect to pay reasonable processing fees
required by lien-holders and/or easement-holders in connection with the execution and
delivery of a Release or Subordination of any mortgage, lien or other encumbrance
recorded against the property underlying the Easement; provided, however, that any
apportionment and distribution of the full compensation amount in Paragraph 2 which
may be required by any mortgagee, lien-holder or other encumbrance-holder for the
protection of its security interest, or as consideration due to any diminution in the value
of its property right, shall be the responsibility of the Owner, and shall be deducted on
the Closing Statement from the compensation payable to the Owner per Paragraph 2.
County shall have sole discretion as to what constitutes "reasonable processing fees." In
accordance with the provisions of Section 201.01, Florida Statutes, concerning payment
of documentary stamp taxes by County, Owner shall further pay all documentary stamp
taxes required on the instrument(s) of transfer, unless the Easement is acquired under
threat of condemnation.
Packet Page -151-
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
Page 5
11. PRIOR YEAR AD VALOREM TAXES - There shall be deducted from the proceeds of
sale all prior year ad valorem taxes and assessments levied against the parent tract
property which remain unpaid as of the date of Closing.
12. EFFECTIVE DATE - This Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof shall be
effective as of the date this Agreement is executed by both parties and shall inure to the
benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors,
personal representatives, successors, successor trustees, and/or assignees, whenever
the context so requires or admits.
13. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE - If the Owner holds the property underlying the Easement in the
form of a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust or any form of representative
capacity whatsoever for others, Owner shall make a written public disclosure, according
to Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, under oath, subject to the penalties prescribed for
perjury, of the name and address of every person having a beneficial interest in the
property underlying the Easement before the Easement held in such capacity is
conveyed to County. (If the corporation is registered with the Federal Securities
Exchange Commission or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose
stock is for sale to the general public, it is hereby exempt from the provisions of Chapter
286, Florida Statutes.)
14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT - Conveyance of the Easement, or any interest in the property
underlying the Easement, by Owner is contingent upon no other provisions, conditions,
or premises other than those so stated herein; and this written Agreement, including all
exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire Agreement and understanding of the
parties, and there are no other prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements,
undertakings, promises, warranties, or covenants not contained herein. No modification,
amendment or cancellation of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless
made in writing and executed and dated by both Owner and County.
15. BREACH AND TERMINATION - If either party fails to perform any of the covenants,
promises or obligations contained in this Agreement, such party will have breached this
Agreement and the other party may provide written notice of said breach to the party in
breach, whereupon the party in breach shall have 15 days from the date of said notice to
remedy said breach. If the party in breach shall have failed to remedy said breach, the
other party may, at its option, terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of
termination to the party in breach and shall have the right to seek and enforce all rights
and remedies available at law or in equity, including the right to seek specific
performance of this Agreement.
16. SEVERABILITY - Should any part of this Agreement be found to be invalid, then such
invalid part shall be severed from the Agreement, and the remaining provisions of this
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and not be affected by such invalidity.
17. VENUE - This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Florida.
Packet Page -152-
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
Page 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date
first above written.
AS TO COUNTY:
DATED:
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
Deputy Clerk Donna Fiala, Chairperson
AS TO OWNER:
DATED:
Witness (Signature) Norman L. Taylor !
t `"ti �%TrO
Name(Print or Type)
Witness (Signature)
Name (Print or Type)
Witness (Signature) Janne Taylor
Y+.
Name (Print or Type)'
Witness (Signature)
/ F
Name (Print or Type)
Packet Page-153- CAO
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
Page 7
DATED:
Witness (Signature) Richard A. Faust
Name (Print or Type)
/:
Witness (Signature)
Name (Print or Type)
J,47-4-64'
Witness (Signature) Carolyn A. Faust
Name(Print or Type)
/ .4!
Witness (Signature)
Name (Print or Type)
Approved as to form and legality:
' 1:1)
Assistant 6unty Attorney
Last Revised:06/23/15
Packet Page -154-
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
. ,
- - --------
,,
i. . . .'
/1
i . .
, .
, . .
... , HIBIT___L2-[ .
EX
, , Page_t_of--4--
, '•• .
, .
• - - —
. ,
. . .
. I
...
1 • . '. . -. .
E I
,.., . . . TRACT 1
77L; GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
UNIT 77 I
, 7 PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 15 I
LEV;ifi .'
.1,.,_0,
• • ; • ' : No)ir : 66 ;
2F,
P19-3 1' 17:",A,1 ' 20920'
.2.. •
1
TRACT 2 i L
5.6:57 i664E: Cr , • ; 1-11, i 560'26'7:-E' i. 55;-.),20' I
wEST 50• Cf/ , - . , .. , , ,
';'...:— 1-71 N6.9.3111,',1"E 1 11899C151 1
h 1
SOL726-2.1"11 25.00'
. 1
..,
1 PROPOSED ROADWAY CASEMENT .;
PARCEL 391 PL.TUE
. ,
. . ,. .
. . „A
‘....ii
,-,-,, )
,
:, ---K!'""*"......---
, . .
, - . . ..
1.T.
GOLDEN (TAT( 0OULEVARD (Cl 576)
1,E301;;64/PtC.62;
r.7,A24,A'', DP,A1N'...„.i. ,N',-„,
.. . „ .
! . E K:.':.:t.;(.; ;;6‘..e,r6O)/v6/•': EA0i',.6;-NI; ,-67.6,,04):TEO
LEGAL DESCRiPTION FOR PARCEL 391 ROLLE
A POP:P01-4 9' 1111.A1:,1: 1. 6.01.19ELL GCE c:FT ALI', Ord.; /7 /4;:, 1111.9.20RDEC.1 'hi PLAT BCOP, 5, PACE 1:. CLI: THE
PN6i616, n6_06);),64 6-.;) 1101;9E6 06,9.1NT-,', h'2.911112i, L.-0W.; 9,6,9,16:,;6. ;', 1,96,6'6,6666F 49 9,0;„TH, P-6.6.64;, :1.6 66:67,
901 H19H! 2(91',T91, 61,21-1-0A, E19171h1C 1,10PE ;6,6;6::01.61.1.66,,I ,-.6-17C.PC...: ;60 FOL.1.0v,S.
9,,,DKIL•1-.1,;(..9NL:', A: 1--',E. 06),1161.-.60-7 ‘6,DTZNI,R OF 1',A1,9 1‘.1.-.‘4" '.
OF :916 12911-H 69 11"El DE .S4,1"") 7:11,41,211 1 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING Cr THE HEREIN or';-.,P.: .,
,A,, ,r••• -.0...L.; ).,:AtO N1266,1i6 1 6.;...'. PDF 2'99 :.176 1-ET1 70 r1-66 EAST ,111.16 19E 1'26.-1-1 1.:,1,1 661 ',1:-E 6916,
THENCE N.001:216:12.111k• AIONC, 6,A1D CA12T '.1NE, ECR 010."0 17E1 Ni A P61101 011 11-16: 1,1271L t. 0' SAID
14-01
1 h,T6N-C1.1 N6191.',,1:06,*E, AUDIO 9.6.1E; NC,R-ri4
U:, 60,111, ‘2,1;90 20 6 Ell-
1H111,1012. 11,--95:26:41;11. .
T6;ENCE. 00911121., CCR 444593 UE 1 12 A 111 ON HE EISI 1911E 01 SAO 711:101: 11
-;ENcr. s 00'28'22'E., ALONG FAIL) E769 2.,11:_, roR ::!-.:.oz., FLIT TO n 2 POINT OF BEGINNING OF 'HI !ILRE iN
OLSON/3E D P16R:iEL,
1
CN666‘) N.,1
;.: 401 ';a6-)1,6P,E, FEET, 66 0
0R: !..E.S'.;. ii1%1 :i
I
1tt,4 ''''
o 5o loe 4. .‘11)..;1
IMEINIEN6nutualiSMEMIZE=.
SKETCH & DESCRIPTION ONLY
NOT A SO(SOAPY SURVEY !.1c.ALY. 1.--,,,Ic2;• ''''.. '. 'II'°)
po:-..., c.- ,.!;ER cTAINTsr T"T,,TN'EPNMENT t50AFT) 06 24/..62Th 6,(;), r1Y2i,.0...:
001.9100 GATE H01."LEVA R D TA It TA'''".
Picuuking
Vastalitaioll
SE:1'1C II k DESCRIPTION OF: PROPOSED ROADWAY EASEMENT CONS111:11.50 Cavil Engirt:3m
...11L IL V T 1_ .34. Strverios&hivri.v
PARCEL 391 29190 6t310 WItt.Pali DrIvo.r,,,52c0
Nark.,Rork.WO
COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA PhOPU:(23%597-057S PAX 1.239 fi97 55a
LE No:6952
SCAL6 EV.",l'_ OP:.://6iN 5.)," ILE tVJ,4L STIEET
9t..927 7 00.90 C-12,01 1,.: 6 4 9 2,I'''. 1 "-:- ,,, 1 C.)D' I FEF-.. 2 DC".'? 5.D.L P, 77 1',1h:991
I Packet Page -155- 1 CAO
L....„... ....... _
-----
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
r W �
EXHINT —
page_._..1—°f.._._2-- W
Z ' s
0 0 ,.
8 ,4x
r W +.y
X x YY st :11
-L
;-t
_ e< d
Jy(' •8
,r !Si
We qG
_ R 7 i� � i ff '.4 W F i/i/
h
� r
g .1.-— 20/ i g
02
f; r .a X81- n - a Zy
\\ g �,
r f" �\\ ,a6 rp Yw fill s(.gt 23 Yo I=.4 w
\, " a `!Wigp gu4 S
8Pli rg-*
jam`/�. ii ;1 iiiiraill 14IP
1 r ailw§' f ,
vnf lag! Zw'
r acr-5 z !2<inl$w$ ois i �=",1 Lti
<143 Hi W n g
Q W q G
1 f T, t!t ! K/8;W Z
74
CS i,yi}� 4' fe wz2
ill I
i Tt sem° gs �
2 ,51,' `� ,1 '
I„. Qtil g`c on Rb ,g=� �l .z E //�°e-v. `$,-W Age �A..... .�e1'!� ` °t
2' rAr ---- �� ..�.1_..'• _ , — ar l
!_Irk — 1
J ! —� - ---------
1.1
O 1 x Wi 3 i ! its
,,01- 1 III!! I g Ib J
Ii.I11�,ng e 8
.__ =, � —--— — �r ----:.-Li 1 Iii
) —I-----"'"*"— 44 ow Awsalgov
Ig +;a;
V 11
1 in
1Hi
2h
V
z=.,zz
o
z
\., /
CIPacket Page -156-
7/12/2016 16.A.2.
Location Map -
3 91 RDUE
,; J,' «ter
,
1
)413'.5".'°'4'71:
— -5QOQW '
'fir
r
ii .� $i` { t ..
£ -,,,',.-44+,1,4,..;,-.1- ' _ a �
ii;
Cf Yo�cr •s� r k `
� -r\
„...,.,,i , ,v,..,
4
,'',,''''t''..1';” -;ig,r,:t'' tik4VIS l''.14*'..„, ,'..'. 'r''' /7.,q!'.411+11ifil;*`-'.
i VIA di-'' -I' lf c:',ikI•• 1,1'4'Icii'l In-4441.4,*•.
.1.- ;_t -41 ,.. , - ,...„ ,-,,,,,... : .., -.:4).,,,,,,,,,,,--, i
*iz, a i is i.
al
411'
1 ':''''.'t, x..r h ' `Y' t.. . iii:" `m
A i x
ItY l',pj 41.- ,ii"' 4 r#Ili�Y.. N'• {' fly'
Y', .Y �„ .4z
t ° t : k 3R' b
Packet Page -157-
Attached :
Are the hyperlink
documents from the
Executive Summary
301 Yamato Road, Suite 1240
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Office: (561) 573-0285
E-Mail: fcardo@cardoappraisal.com
Cardo Appraisal Group LLC
APPRAISERS CONSULTANTS
APPRAISAL OF
Parcel Number: 391 Roadway, Drainage & Utility Easement (RDUE)
Project Name: Golden Gate Blvd, (CR 876) Proposed Rd. Easement
Parent Taxpayer of Record: Richard A & Carolyn A Faust
Part Taken Size: 54,401 Square Feet - Land
Parent Location: NEC corner of Golden Gate Blvd. E. & Everglades Blvd.
For
Collier County
Transportation Right-Of-Way Office
By
Frank J. Cardo, MAI
State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ1190
Date of Value: February 2, 2016
Date of Report: February 5, 2016
FILE NUMBER: 2016001.382
Cardo Appraisal Group LLC
APPRAISERS CONSULTANTS
Frank J. Cardo, MAI, President
STATE-CERTIFIED GENERAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISER RZ1190 Over 25 years quality experience in Florida
301 Yamato Road, Suite 1240
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Office: (561) 573-0285
E-Mail: fcardo@cardoappraisal.com
February 5, 2016
Harry Henderson, SRA
Review Appraiser
Transportation Right-of-Way Office
Collier County
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Proposed Acquisition: Parcel 391 (RDUE)
Project Name: (GGB) and (EB) Roadway Widening Project
Parent Tract Location: NEC corner of Golden Gate Blvd. E. & Everglades Blvd.
Taxpayer of Record: Richard A & Carolyn A Faust
At your request, we have personally appraised the property referenced above. This
parcel is being acquired as part of Collier County making intersection improvements at
Golden Gate Boulevard (GGB) and Everglades Boulevard (EB). This is known as the
(GGB) and (EB) Roadway Widening Project.
The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate compensation due for the taking of the
parcel, and damages to the remainder, if any, for the property to be acquired, as of
January 15, 2016. The intended use of this appraisal is to aid Collier County in
negotiating just compensation for the proposed acquisition.
The parent tract is located at the northeast corner of Golden Gate Blvd. E. & Everglades
Boulevard in the unincorporated area of Collier County, Naples, Florida. The Parent Tract
is known as Big Bear Plaza.
In front of the parent tract are existing roadway easements. This area also appears to
function as drainage area for the road. The proposed easement is for modifying,
improving and expanding the existing roadway for the intersection improvements. The
proposed new Roadway, Drainage and Utility Easement (RDUE) are at the front (s) of
the parent tract and will be used in perpetuity.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
Harry Henderson, SRA
Review Appraiser
Transportation Right-of-Way Office
Collier County
February 5, 2016
Page 2
Based on an examination of all relevant factors, as well as a general knowledge of real
estate valuation procedures, we have formed an opinion that on February 2, 2016,
total compensation due for the taking of Parcel (s), plus damages, if any, to the
remainder is as follows:
As of the date of value, the appraiser has utilized the hypothetical condition assuming
the proposed acquisition and the proposed improvements have been completed.
The following appraisal report contains our analysis of the data along with other
materials on which the estimates of value were predicated. This letter must remain
attached to the report, which contains 54 pages plus related exhibits, in order for the
value opinion set forth to be considered valid. Your attention is directed to the
Assumptions and Limiting Conditions contained within this report.
This appraisal has been prepared for use by the Collier County Board of Commissioners
and is property of the Collier County Board of Commissioners. Reliance upon this
appraisal for other uses is not warranted.
Respectfully submitted,
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
Frank J. Cardo, MAI
State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ1190
Summary of Compensation
189,000$
-$
-$
-$
189,000$ Total Compensation
Value of Part Taken - Parcel 391 RDUE (Land):
Value of Part Taken - Parcel 391 RDUE (Improvements):
Cost to Cure:
Damages:
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
Table of Contents
Summary Of Important Facts And Conclusions .............................................................. 1
Collier County Certification Of Value ............................................................................... 3
General Assumptions And Limiting Conditions ............................................................... 4
Subject Photographs ....................................................................................................... 9
Area / Location Maps .................................................................................................... 12
Parent Tract – Aerial Maps ............................................................................................ 14
Purpose And Date Of Report ........................................................................................ 15
Property Appraised........................................................................................................ 15
Property Inspection ............................................................................................. 15
Parent Tract ........................................................................................................ 15
Part Taken .......................................................................................................... 15
Remainder .......................................................................................................... 15
Client ............................................................................................................................. 16
Intended Use And User ................................................................................................. 16
Scope Of Assignment .................................................................................................... 16
Property Rights Appraised ............................................................................................ 17
Definition Of Just Compensation ................................................................................... 17
Definition Of Market Value ............................................................................................ 17
Neighborhood Description ............................................................................................. 18
Parent Tract - Property Data ......................................................................................... 22
Taxpayer Of Record, Parcel Folio Number (S), Real Estate Assessment And Taxes ... 22
Zoning Map......................................................................................................... 23
Zoning And Future Land Use Discussion ...................................................................... 25
Site Analysis ....................................................................................................... 27
Highest And Best Use ................................................................................................... 29
Sales Comparison Approach ......................................................................................... 32
Valuation Of The Part Taken ............................................................................................ 48
Remainder ..................................................................................................................... 51
Summary of Compensation ........................................................................................... 53
Qualifications for Frank J. Cardo, MAI (St. Cert. Gen. REA RZ1190)
Data Book
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
Table of Contents – Data Book
Taking Sketch ..............................................................................................................A-1
Zoning Maps ................................................................................................................A-2
Planned Unit Developments, Commercial and Industrial Zoning ............................... A-17
Approved Commercial Centers At Golden Glades Blvd. E & Everglades Blvd. .......... A-18
Land Sale 1 ................................................................................................................ A-19
Land Sale 2 ................................................................................................................ A-21
Land Sale 3 ................................................................................................................ A-22
Land Sale 4 ................................................................................................................ A-23
Listings ....................................................................................................................... A-28
Property Owner Notification Letter ............................................................................. A-39
Big Bear Plaza Ordinance .......................................................................................... A-40
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
1
SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Parcel (s) 391 RDUE
Client - Intended User: Collier County Government
Harry Henderson, SRA
Review Appraiser Transportation Right-of-Way Office
Taxpayer of Record: Richard A. & Carolyn A Faust
4651 West Boulevard
Naples, FL 34103
Property Rights Appraised: Fee simple estate
Special Assumptions Reference: Extraordinary Assumption, Refer to # 7, 13 and 23 of the
Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
Unusual Market Externality: None
Parent Tract
Location Southeast corner of Golden Gate Blvd. E. &
Everglades Blvd.
Parent Tract, Site/Land Area: 5.46 acres
Improvements: Vacant land
Zoning & Land Use Plan: E- Estates – Commercial Neighborhood Subdistrict
Highest & Best Use: Future commercial development
Exposure Time: Eight months to one year
Marketing Time: Eight months to one year
Part Taken – Parcel 391 RDUE
Part Taken Site/Land Area: 54,401 square feet
Type of Taking: Perpetual Roadway, Drainage & Utility Easement
Proposed Use: Modifying/ improving/expanding the existing
Roadway intersection, drainage & utility systems.
Highest & Best Use: Future commercial development as part of parent tract.
Remainder of Parent Tract
Site/Land Area: 5.46 acres.
Highest & Best Use: Same size as before the taking except front will be
encumbered with an expanded roadway, drainage &
utility easements to be used in perpetuity. Future
commercial development or development in
conjunction with possible corner assemblage.
Effects on the Remainder None
Damages to the Remainder None
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
2
SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION
Date of Value: February 2, 2016
Date of Report: February 5, 2016
Dates of Inspection: January 7, 15, 20, 2016 & February 5, 2016
& various other times
Appraiser:
Frank J. Cardo, MAI
State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser RZ1190
1. Value Before the Taking:(Land)833,000$
2. Value of Part Taken: (Land)
189,000$
644,000$
644,000$
-$
-$
6. Special Benefits:-$
7. Damages (5-6):-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
189,000$
-$
-$
-$
189,000$
Value of Part Taken - Parcel 391 RDUE (Land):
Value of Part Taken - Parcel 391 RDUE (Improvements):
Cost to Cure:
Damages:
Total Compensation
11. Damages Uncurable Severance (7-10):
12. Cost to Cure:
13. Improvements Cured, but paid in (2):
14. Net Cost to Cure (If less than item (10), cost is
justified unless the cost is minor):
Summary of Compensation
Feasibilty of Cost to Cure
8. Value of Remainder (Cured):
9 Value of Remainder (Uncured):
10. Damages (Curable) (8-9):
Summary of Values & Compensation
Partial Acquisition
3. Value of Remainder As Part of Whole (1-2):
4. Value of Remander Uncured:
5. Damages, Total Uncured (3-4):
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
3
COLLIER COUNTY CERTIFICATION OF VALUE
County Road: Golden Gate Blvd.
Road Number: 876
County: Collier
County Project: GGB & EB Roadway, Drainage & Utility
Improvements
Parcel No.: 391 RDUE
I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
1) The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
2) The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions
and is my personal unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
3) I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias
with respect to the parties involved.
4) My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the
cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent
event.
5) My analyses, opinions, or conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared in conformity with the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, and the provisions of Chapter 475, Part II, Florida Statutes.
6) I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report and I have afforded the property owner
the opportunity to accompany me at the time of the inspection. I also have made a personal field inspection of the comparable
sales relied upon in making this appraisal. The subject and the comparable sales relied upon in making these appraisals were as
represented by the photographs contained in this appraisal.
7) No persons other than those named herein provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report.
8) I understand that this appraisal is to be used in connection with the acquisition of right of way for a transportation facility to
be constructed by Collier County.
9) This appraisal has been made in conformity with the appropriate state laws, regulations, policies, and procedures
applicable to appraisal of right of way for transportation purposes; and, to the best of my knowledge, no portion of the property
value entered on this certificate consists of items, which are non-compensable under the established law of the State of Florida.
10) I have not revealed the findings or results of this appraisal to anyone other than the proper officials of Collier County and I will not
do so until so authorized by county officials, or until I am required by due process of law, or until I am release d from this obligation
by having publicly testified as to such findings.
11) Regardless of any stated limiting conditions or assumptions, I acknowledge that this appraisal report and all maps, data,
summaries, charts, and other exhibits collected or prepared under this agreement shall become the property of Collier County
without restriction of limitation of their use.
12) Statements supplement to this certification required by membership or candidacy in a professional organization are described on
an addendum to this certificate and, by reference, are made part hereof.
13) Based upon my independent appraisal and the exercise of my professional judgment, my opinion of the market value for the part
taken, including net severance damages after special benefits, if any, of the property appraised as of February 2, 2016 is $189,000.00.
MARKET VALUE SHOULD BE ALLOCATED AS FOLLOWS:
LAND $189,000.00 LAND AREA ENGLISH (AC/SF) 54,401 SF
IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 PROPERTY TYPE CODE * (1234) UVP
NET DAMAGES and/or COST TO CURE 0.00
TOTAL $189,000.00 PROPERTY TYPE CODES:
1. R- RURAL U-URBAN
I -Improved
2. V- Vacant
H- (Home) Residence
3. B- (Business) F- (Factory) Industrial
A- Agricultural
S- Special Purpose
W- Whole Taking
4. P- Partial
Frank J. Cardo MAI
State-Certified General Real Estate
Appraiser RZ1190
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
4
GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
This appraisal report has been prepared using the following general assumptions and limiting
conditions:
1. Unless otherwise stated, the value appearing in this appraisal represents the opinion of
the market value or the value defined as of the date specified. Market value of real estate is
affected by national and local economic conditions and consequently will vary with future
changes in such conditions.
2. The legal description provided to Cardo Appraisal Group LLC for this report is assumed
to be correct, that the title on the property is in good standing, that there are no restrictions on
the title. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for related legal matters, nor renders any
opinion as to the property’s title. All existing liens and encumbrances, if any, have been
disregarded, and the property has been appraised as though free and clear, under responsible
ownership and competent management.
3. The value estimated in this appraisal report is gross, without any consideration given to
encumbrances, restrictions or questions regarding the title, unless specifically defined.
4. The appraiser’s opinion of value has been based on the assumption of competent
ownership, marketing and management of the subject property. Without competent marketing
and management, then the appraisal value stated herein might not apply.
5. No responsibility is assumed for accuracy of information furnished by or from any parties,
the clients, his designees or public records. Cardo Appraisal Group, LLC is not liable for such
information or the work of subcontractors. When possible, comparable data relied upon for this
report has been confirmed with one or more parties familiar with the particular transaction or
from an affidavit. All comparable data included is considered appropriate to the best of our
knowledge and belief.
6 All engineering studies, if any, are assumed to be correct. The plot plans, sketches and
maps in this report are included only to assist the reader to visualize the property and are not
necessarily to scale. Any photos are included for the same purpose and are not intended to
represent the property other than what is pictured at the time the photo was taken. The
appraiser has made no survey of the property and assumes no responsibility in connection with
any such surveys.
7. The appraiser has inspected the land and any improvements. However, the report was
prepared assuming no hidden or unapparent physical conditions of the property, subsoil or
structures that render the property more or less valuable. The appraiser assumes no
responsibility for such conditions or for obtaining any engineering studies that would possibly
reveal them. Therefore, unless such matters are specifically noted for consideration in this
report, the value estimate is not subject to any such conditions.
8. It is assumed the subject property is in full compliance with all local, state and federal
environmental laws and regulations, unless any lack of compliance is stated, described or
considered in the appraisal report.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
5
9. It is assumed the subject property conforms to all applicable zoning and use regulations
unless a non-conforming use has been identified, described and considered in this appraisal
report.
10. It is assumed all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents and other
administrative or legislative authority from any local, state or national government agency, or
from any private entity, have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the
appraised value of the subject property, stated in this report, is based.
11. No environmental impact study, special market study, or highest-and-best-use analysis
has been either requested or made unless otherwise specified in the agreement between Cardo
Appraisal Group, LLC and its client. Should any previous or subsequent study become known
the appraiser, the appraiser reserves an unlimited right to alter, amend, revise or rescind any
statement, finding, opinion, values, estimates or conclusions.
12. It is assumed that the use of land and improvements is confined within the boundaries of
the subject property described, and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted in
the report.
13. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous material, which may or
may not be present on the property, was not observed by the appraiser nor called to the
attention of the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on
or in the property. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances and may
not be held accountable for the presence of substances such as asbestos, urea-formaldehyde
foam insulation or other potentially hazardous materials that might affect the value of the
property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on
or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such
conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client
is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired.
14. The appraiser has not made a specific compliance survey or analysis to determine
whether the subject property conforms to the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), which took
effect Jan. 26, 1992. Non-conformity, as determined by an ADA compliance survey, along with a
detailed analysis of ADA requirements, could result in a lower property value. However, the
appraiser did not consider possible ADA non-compliance in preparing this report and estimating
value. The appraiser recommends that parties who seek to determine ADA compliance hire a
competent legal professional, along with architects and engineers versed in ADA requirements,
to conduct an “ADA Audit” of the property and structures. Although the cost to remedy any non-
compliance could reduce the property value estimate contained in this report, the appraiser
assumes no responsibility for any such condition, nor for any ADA expertise needed to discover
possible non-compliance.
15. This appraisal is to be used only in its entirety. All opinions and conclusions included in
the report were prepared by the appraiser(s) whose signature(s) appear on the report. No
changes of any item in the report shall be made by anyone other than the appraiser(s), and the
Cardo Appraisal Group, LLC shall have no responsibility should any unauthorized changes be
made.
16. The distribution of the total valuation stated in this report between land and improvements
applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
6
building(s) must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal, no matter how similar, and
are invalid if used as such.
17. Possession of the report, or a copy of it, does not carry any right to publish the report, nor
may it be used other than for its intended use. The fee attached is for analytical services only.
The report may not be used for any purpose or by any person or corporation other than the
client or party to whom it is addressed. Nor may it be copied without written consent of an officer
of Cardo Appraisal Group LLC., and then only in its entirety.
18. This appraisal report has been prepared for the exclusive benefit of the client, its
successors or assigns. It may not be used or relied upon by any other party without express,
written permission of the appraiser and client. Furthermore, any party who uses or relies upon
any information in this report, without written consult “does so at his own risk”. If client refers this
report to an approved party, client is responsible for making the party aware of all the
assumptions and limiting conditions of this report.
19. Disclosure of the contents of this appraisal report is governed under the By-Laws and
Regulations of the Appraisal Institute. Neither all nor any part of this report shall be made public
without the written of the author, including the valuation conclusions, the identity of the appraiser
or appraisal firm. In addition, this includes any reference to the Appraisal Institute or to the MAI
designation.
20. The appraiser may not divulge the material contents of the report, analytical findings or
conclusions or give a copy of the report to anyone but the client or his designee, as specified in
writing, except in cases where the report has been requested, by the Appraisal Institute, a court
of law or any entity with the power to subpoena.
21. The appraiser(s) is not required to give testimony in deposition, in court, or at a
governmental hearing, about this appraisal or the subject property, unless prior arrangements
have been made and the appraiser has granted prior approval. The arrangements must be
made no less than 30 days before the anticipated date of testimony. Further, the appraiser
reserves the right to consider and evaluate additional data that becomes available between the
date of the report and the date of the hearing, if applicable, and to make any necessary
adjustments to the value opinion. In addition, no testimony will be rendered unless the entire
appraisal fee has been paid. Further, all testimony will be subject to expert witness fees
previously approved by the appraiser.
22. Liability of Cardo Appraisal Group, LLC and its employees is limited to the fee collected
for the appraisal. There is no accountability or liability to any third party.
23. The appraisers have been instructed, by the client, to perform an exterior only inspection
of the subject property. At the inspection the property was fenced and locked, prohibiting the
appraisers’ access to the exterior of the building. The appraisers have relied upon building
information available through the Property Appraiser’s Office of Collier County and exterior
measurements by the appraiser from outside of the property to complete this analysis. If this
information should prove to be incorrect, the appraisers reserve the right to alter the estimate of
value contained herein. This is considered an extraordinary assumption.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
7
24. Should the appraiser be required to enforce the above assumptions and limiting
conditions against any entity, person or persons claiming damages because of reliance upon or
use of this appraisal report, such parties shall be liable to the appraiser for all reasonable
attorney’s fees, costs and expenses incurred by the appraiser in enforcing this contract or
defending the contingent conditions set forth in this appraisal report. That includes any costs
incurred either with or without a lawsuit, and any trials or appeals. Acceptance of the delivery
or payment of this report constitute acceptance of this condition and all other conditions
detailed under Assumptions and Limiting Conditions.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
8
PARENT TRACT
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
9
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS
Corner view of subject’s Parent Tract looking at the northeast corner of
Golden Gate Boulevard E. and Everglades Boulevard.
Street scene looking north along Everglades Boulevard.
Parent Tract
Parent Tract & Part Taken
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
10
View of subject looking northeasterly across Everglades Boulevard.
View of subject looking north along Everglades Boulevard.
Parent Tract
Parent Tract & Part Taken
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
11
Looking west along Golden Gate Boulevard E.
Parent Tract
Parent Tract
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
12
AREA / LOCATION MAPS
Collier County Base Map
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
13
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
14
PARENT TRACT – AERIAL MAP
Parent Tract Size = 5.46 acres
Part Taken Size = 54,401 SF
299.98
ft
75 ft
630.19 ft
25 ft
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
15
PURPOSE AND DATE OF REPORT
The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate compensation due for the proposed
acquisition described herein, and damages to the remainder, if any, for the property to be
acquired, as of February 2, 2016.
PROPERTY APPRAISED
This parcel is being appraised as part of Collier County making intersection
improvements at Golden Gate Boulevard (GGB) and Everglades Boulevard (EB). This
is known as the (GGB) and (EB) Roadway Widening Project.
The parent tract is located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Boulevard East and
Everglades Boulevard in the unincorporated area of Collier County, Naples, Florida.
The total area of Part Taken contains 54,401 square feet. See sketch in the data book
section of this report for the Part Taken dimensions.
Property Inspection
Frank J. Cardo, MAI made a number of inspections of the subject between December 1,
2015 and February 2, 2016.
The property owner was notified via letter sent by U.S. Mail, and advised of our
intentions to make a formal inspection of the subject. We invited the property owner
and/or their agents to share any information that they have on the subject property.
Frank J Cardo conducted a final exterior site inspection on February 2, 2016, which is
the effective date of valuation.
Parent Tract
The parent tract is located at the northeast corner of Golden Gate Boulevard East and
Everglades Boulevard in the unincorporated area of Collier County, Naples, Florida.
The parent tract is a vacant tract of land containing 5.46 acres. Legal Description See deed in addendum
Part Taken - See sketch and legal description in part taken section of this report.
Remainder
The remainder will be the same as before the taking except there will be an easement
at the front of the subject's parent tract. The property owner will have enough land area
to develop the remainder. The taking has no effect to the remainder.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
16
CLIENT
Collier County Government c/o
Harry Henderson, SRA
Review Appraiser
Transportation Right-of-Way Office
INTENDED USE AND USER
The intended use of this appraisal is to aid Collier County in negotiating just
compensation for the right-of-way acquisitions described herein.
This appraisal has been prepared for use by the Collier County Board of
Commissioners and is property of the Collier County Board of Commissioners. Reliance
upon this appraisal for other uses is not warranted.
SCOPE OF ASSIGNMENT
The taking was not physically delineated on site by engineering stakes. We used due
diligence locating the taking boundaries by approximating measurements from the
Collier County Property Appraisers website and using landmarks on site to locate the
boundaries of the takings.
Based on our review of the parent tract, as well as the taking, we find that the reduction
in size of the parent tract does not adversely impact the future development of the
remainder. Therefore, the taking has no adverse impact on the function, marketability or
value of the remainder.
The value of the land is estimated by the Sales Comparison Approach.
Because the subject property is being valued as vacant land, the cost and income
approaches are not applicable. Therefore, only the sales comparison analysis is being
utilized. The omission of the other two approaches is not considered misleading to the
client.
Sales data considered for this appraisal was obtained from the Collier County Public
Records, LoopNet and similar properties previously appraised by Cardo Appraisal
Group, LLC.
Total compensation has been calculated by estimating the fee simple market value of
the parent tract before and after the taking(s) including the valuation of the part(s) taken
and an analysis of potential damages resulting from the proposed taking.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
17
PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED
The property rights being appraised are those of fee simple title and an easement.
"Fee Simple" is defined as absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or
estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation,
eminent domain, police power and escheat.
"Easement" is defined as an interest in real property that conveys use, but not
ownership, of a portion of an owner's property.
Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition, American
Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, 2010.
DEFINITION OF JUST COMPENSATION
Just Compensation is defined as "...the amount of the loss for which a property owner
has established a claim to compensation. It is the payment of the market value of the
real estate which was taken." Another definition says, "just compensation" means value
of land taken and damage, if any, to land not taken."
It universally has been held that damages to a remainder parcel in a partial taking case
are part and parcel of just compensation in a constitutional sense.
The basic premise is that the owner must be compensated for the taking of the land, as
opposed to being compensated for the land taken. It is also generally recognized that
property encompasses the entire bundle of rights inherent in the ownership of the real
estate and the taking or infringement on these rights often constitutes a taking, even if
no part of the physical real estate is taken."
Source: Real Estate Valuation Litigation, 2nd Edition, American Institute of
Real Estate Appraisers, Copyright 1995, Page 17.
DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE
Fair Market Value is defined as "...the amount of money that a purchaser willing but not
obliged to buy the property would pay an owner willing but not obliged to sell, taking into
consideration all uses to which the property is adapted and might be applied in reason."
Source: Florida Eminent Domain Practice and Procedures, 5th ed., The
Florida Bar Continuing Education, 1996, Page 9-64. State Road
Department v. Stack, 231 So.2d 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969).
Market Value is also defined as "...the price which would be agreed to by an informed
seller who is willing but not obligated to sell, and an informed buyer who is willing but
not obligated to buy."
Source: Uniform Eminent Domain Code, Copyright 1974, § 1004, Page 7.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
18
NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION
General Area Description for Golden Gate Estates
The preceding map shows the general outline of the subject’s neighborhood. Golden
Gate Estates was founded by the Gulf American Land Corporation by purchasing 177
square miles of land area that now contain 31,000 ± platted lots. This area is located 7
miles northeast of the City of Naples, on the north side north of Alligator Alley (I-75)
within the unincorporated areas of Collier County but bears a Naples address. About
50% of the lots in Golden Gate Estates have some wetlands. Green Boulevard is an old
landing strip and many buyers saw their lot from the air. Sales were slow and by 1970
there fewer than 2,000 residents.
Subject
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
19
The primary roadways that provide the main access to the neighborhood include the
following primary roadways:
• Golden Gate Boulevard;
• Collier Boulevard (CR 951);
• Wilson Boulevard;
• Everglades Boulevard; and
• Desoto Boulevard.
The home sites range in size from one acre to over five acres. Some homesteads can
be as large as ten acres. The Golden Gate Estates area is composed of two separate
sub-markets, the Urban Estates area, which lies west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), and
the Rural Estates area, which lies east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951).
Homes can be entry-level homes to glamorous mansions closer to the beach.
Guesthouses, pickup trucks, all-terrain vehicles (ATV) and recreational vehicles (RV)
also allowed on all premises unlike many other communities. Single family homes are
found in Golden Gate Estates with some located on mile-long streets that dead-end at a
canal-providing desired privacy for owners.
All wetland lots are buildable, though special permits are required. The size of the house
and pool are not restricted, but detached structures may not be placed within a wetland.
Most lots that have wetland have upland.
Subject
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
20
Available utilities within the primary market area include telephone, electrical service and
emergency services. Water is typically via by private a well and wastewater is typically
via a private septic tank and drain field combination.
Golden Gate Estates favors horses and some more exotic animals like Alpacas and
Llamas. Many hiking trails have year round access. Picayune Strand State Forest is
located in South Golden Gate Estates and Belle Meade is more than 65,000 acres of
recreational land.
MARKET AREA ATTRIBUTE RATINGS
Highway Access Average
Demand Generators Average
Convenience to Support Services Average
Convenience to Public Average
Property Compatibility Good
General Appearance of Properties Average to Good
Appeal to Market Average to Good
Prices/Value Trend Stable/ Some increases
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
21
Conclusion
It is our opinion, that the neighborhood will maintain its socioeconomic status in relation
to surrounding communities for the foreseeable future.
In general, the residential market is in a state of stable to increasing property values
following a long period of decline with many foreclosures. Recently, the number of bank
foreclosure sales has decreased and the number of listings has declined causing some
price increases.
Good economic conditions, low unemployment and reasonable financing requirements
will continue the recovery on a slow but steady pace. This trend is expected to continue.
Positive regional economic factors including climate, beaches, tourism, demographics,
the regional airport, and the continued growth of Florida Gulf Coast University, will
continue to have positive long range economic impacts.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
22
PARENT TRACT - PROPERTY DATA
Taxpayer of Record, Parcel Folio Number (s), Real Estate Assessment and Taxes
Five-Year Sales History
We have not been provided with a title abstract on the property appraised, nor have
they conducted a title search of their own. However, based upon the confidentiality as
stated in the tax rolls, the subject has not sold within the past five years. The subject is
currently listed for $900,000 or $3.79 per square foot. The property has been listed on
the market for over 2 years. The details of this listing are contained in the data book
section of this report. The subject has a site plan approval for a Commercial PUD and is
known as Big Bear Plaza.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
23
Zoning Map
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
24
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
25
ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DISCUSSION
Previously, Golden Gate was subject to regulations included in the County's Growth
Management Plan. However, in 1991, the area’s distinctive characteristics resulted in
the adoption of a separate Master Plan for Golden Gate. This most recent Master Plan
became a separate part of the County's Growth Management Plan and supersedes the
County-Wide Future Land Use Plan. Therefore, the Golden Gate Area Future Land
Use Map will be used to value the subject property instead of the County-Wide Future
Land Use Map. This separate Future Land Use Map is on the preceding page and found in
the data book.
Both, the Zoning Map and Collier County Future Land Use Map show the parent tract
as having the Estates Designation.
The Estates Designation is characterized by low-density semi-rural residential lots with
limited opportunities for other land uses. Typical lots are 2.25 acres in size. However,
there are some legal non-conforming lots as small as 1.14 acres. Intensifying residential
density shall not be permitted.
On the Golden Gate Future Land Use Map, the parent tract at the intersection of
Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard East has a red box outline that is
marked Neighborhood Sub-district.
The Neighborhood Subdistrict recognizes the need to provide basic goods, services
and amenities to Estates residents. Neighborhood Centers have been designated on the
Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Plan. The Neighborhood Center designation does
not guarantee that commercial zoning will be granted. The designation only provides the
opportunity to request commercial zoning.
There are four neighborhood centers in the Golden Gate Estates area. The subject’s
intersection is known as Everglades Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard Center. A
copy of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan is contained in the data book in the
addendum section of this report.
The Master Plan also states that parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning
within the Neighborhood Centers at the intersection of Everglades Boulevard and
Golden Gate Boulevard may qualify for Conditional Uses Subdistrict under the
transitional conditional use provision of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this Master
Plan Element.
In addition, properties eligible for Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use
shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood Center.
According to David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, of the Collier County
Government, Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive
Planning Section, “the SW and SE quadrants are eligible to be rezoned to allow
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
26
commercial uses in accordance with their Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation”.
“The subject being the NE quadrant of the Center is approximately 5.46 acres in size
and consists of Tract 1, Unit 77 of Golden Gate Estates.”
The subject already has an approved C PUD Mater Plan. See ordinance and exhibit in
the data book section of this report.
Zoning and Future Land Use Conclusion
Based on the preceding data, we conclude that the subject’s typical buyer is a
developer, investor or owner-user that would develop the subject property on a
standalone basis based on the allowable uses contained in the subject’s CPUD Master
Plan Ordinance. Some modification or an amendment to the CPUD Master Plan may be
necessary because of the taking. This modification already exists in the before condition
because the use and users are unknown until a buyer is found. The typical buyer would
bear this cost.
It is our opinion that the subject’s highest and best use is not suited for single family
development but rather for commercial development because Everglades Boulevard and
Golden Gate Boulevard are the main arterials in the Golden Gate Area and there are
very few site available for commercial development.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
27
Close up snips from subject’s approved ordinance contained in the data book section
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
28
Site Analysis
The appraisers have referenced the Collier County Property Appraisers Geographic
Information System "GIS" which locates the subject in Section 5, Township 49, Range
28. It is assumed that this source as well as the legal descriptions obtained from the
property appraisers' accurately represents the size and shape of the parent tract as of
the date of value. These sources, as well as an inspection of the site, have been utilized
for the following site description.
Size and Shape: The parent tract contains 5.46 acres of gross land area and is
rectangular. Specifically, the parent tract has a northern property line along Golden
Gate Boulevard E. that measures 350 ± feet and an east property line along Everglades
Boulevard that measures 680 ± feet.
Roadway Frontage: Golden Gate Boulevard E. and Everglades Boulevard are the
Estates major arterials, undivided, two-lanes, and asphalt paved roadways.
Utilities: The available utilities available to the parent tract include telephone, electrical
service and emergency services. No public water is available. Therefore, a private well
is necessary. Wastewater would be typically disposed of by a private septic tank and
drain field combination.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
29
Topography: A topographical survey or environmental survey of the site was not
provided. The parent tract is a level tract and covered in native vegetation.
Easements and Restrictive Covenants: The parent tract is encumbered by 50-foot wide
road right-of-way easements. The appraiser is not aware of any other easements or
restrictive covenants that might adversely affect the market value and development of
the parent tract before the taking. However, the reader is advised that the appraiser was
not given any title information.
Environmental Hazards: We are not aware of, nor did we observe any adverse
environmental conditions. An environment survey of the subject is beyond the scope of
this appraisal and the client is urged to obtain the opinion of an expert on environmental
issues.
Building & Site Improvement Analysis
None
HIGHEST AND BEST USE
The Appraisal Institute defines "Highest and Best Use" as follows:
"The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or improved property which is
physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible and that results in the
highest value. The four criteria the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility,
physical possibility, financial feasibility and maximum productivity"
Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition 2010, by the
Appraisal Institute.
In estimating highest and best use, there are four aspects to be considered:
1. Physically Possible. What uses are physically appropriate to the site in
question?
2.
3.
4.
Legally Permissible. What uses are permitted by zoning, deed restriction, etc.
on the site in question?
Financially Feasible. Which possible and permissible uses will produce a net
return to the owner of the site?
Maximally Productive. Among the feasible uses, which use will produce the
highest present worth?
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP LLC
30
The highest and best use of a site, considered as if vacant, may be different from the
highest and best use of the entire property as improved at the date of appraisal. The
existing use may then be considered an economically justified interim use until land
value alone exceeds the value of the property as improved, plus demolition costs.
Factors that must be considered in estimating highest and best use include accessibility and transportation, local facilities and services available, the physical attributes of the site, the effect of taxes and zoning, and the broader concept of environmental harmony within the neighborhood. The use must be reasonably probable, legally permitted, and logical; if a use is merely possible but is remote in time and likelihood, it cannot be considered highest and best use. Highest and Best Use of the Site
1.
2.
3.
4.
Physically possible: The subject site is square in shape. The topography is
heavily wooded, generally flat, level and below the approximate road grade.
These characteristics allow the site to support a variety of development types.
However, fill maybe required. No physical impediments to development are
known.
Legally permissible: The subject already has an approved C PUD Mater Plan.
See ordinance and exhibit in the data book section of this report. Uses permitted
by zoning include a wide variety of retailing and service oriented activities as well
as businesses and professional offices.
Financially feasible: Financially feasible uses tend to occur naturally in free-
market environments, and are evident upon observing the marketplace directly.
Considering current value trends and economic conditions, construction of a
commercial building may not be a financially feasible at this time.
Maximally productive: Given the above, the highest and best use of the site, if
vacant, would be holding onto the property until economic conditions allow
development to be financially feasible.
Based on the preceding data, we conclude that the subject’s typical buyer is a
developer, investor or owner-user that would develop the subject property on a
standalone basis based on the allowable uses contained in the subject’s CPUD
Master Plan Ordinance. Some modification or an amendment to the CPUD
Master Plan may be necessary because of the taking. This modification already
exists in the before condition because the use and users are unknown until a
buyer is found. The typical buyer would bear this cost.
It is our opinion that the subject’s highest and best use is not suited for single
family development but rather for commercial development because Everglades
Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard are the main arterials in the Golden Gate
Area and there are very few site available for commercial development.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
31
VALUATION OF THE PARENT TRACT
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
32
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH
The Sales Comparison Approach requires that the appraiser locate recent sales of
similarly improved properties and through an adjustment process arrive at an indication
of what these properties would have sold for if they possessed all of the salient
characteristics of the subject property. These adjusted sales prices are then correlated
into an estimate of the market value of the property via the Sales Comparison Approach
to Value.
A search of Collier County Official Records, paid subscription data services, local
multiple listing service records, discussions with local brokers and appraisers and a
personal inspection of the subject area produced several sales of similar type properties
and one current listing. The sales and listing used in the analysis were the best
comparables that we were able to verify with a party to the transaction.
We compared the selected sales with the subject, considering differences and possible
adjustments. We utilized a quantitative process to compare the subject property with the
comparables to reflect a value for the subject property.
The following pages feature a detailed write up of each comparable used in the
analysis, a location map and summary of the selected comparable sales data, which is
followed by a discussion of the pertinent adjustments and conclusion of value.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
33
Land Sale 1 – OR Book/Page – 5106/317
Sale No. 1 OR 5106/317
In 12/14 sold for $4.63/SF
Sale No. 1 OR 5106/317
In 12/14 sold for $4.63/SF
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
34
Sale No. 1 OR 5106/317
In 12/14 sold for $4.63/SF
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
35
Land Sale 2 – OR Book/Page – 5020/3283
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
36
Sale No. 2 OR 5020/3283
For 3 parcels in 3/14 sold for $10.19/sf
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
37
Land Sale 3 – OR Book/Page – 5116/2795
Sale No 3 OR 5116/2795
In 1/14 sold for $9.43/SF
Sale No.3 OR 5116/2795
In 1/14 sold for $9.43/SF
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
38
Sale No.3 OR 5116/2795
In 1/14 sold for $9.43/SF
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
39
Land Sale 4 - OR Book/Page – 5002/2720
Sale No.4 5002/2720
In 12/13 sold for $7.50/SF
Sale No. 4 OR 5002/2720
In 12/13 sold for $7.50/SF
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
40
Sale No. 4 OR 5002/2720
In 12/13 sold for $7.50/SF
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
41
Sales Discussion
We have valued the subject on a price per square foot of land area basis as is
customary in this market locale.
To value the subject, a search was made for sales in the northeastern part of Collier
County.
A total of four recent sales and three listing are found and are shown on the following
pages in chart form. The detailed information for each sale and listing is contained in the
data book in the addendum of this report. In addition, more details have been retained
in our file.
Each sale and listing was analyzed and compared to the subject on a price per square
foot of land area as that was deemed to provide the highest degree of correlation.
Interest Conveyed: To properly relate the sales to the subject, it must be determined to
the degree possible what property rights were conveyed in the sale transaction. Each of
the sales was a retail or retail/office property and the fee simple/leased fee interest was
conveyed.
Financing Terms: Existing mortgage financing at a favorable rate may affect the
purchase price. It appeared, based on available data that each of the sales was either an
all-cash to seller transaction or subject to conventional financing.
Conditions of Sale: Conditions of sale adjustments usually involve the motivations of the
buyers and sellers when those motivations are considered extraordinary and when they
have an impact on the price paid. If non-market conditions of sale have significantly
affected the price of a property, the sale may be discarded as not being indicative of
market value. There were no unusual conditions of sale involved in the data used.
Market Conditions: This adjustment relates to the economic climate and market
demand occurring at the time of sale. The sales occurred within the past 24 months
from our date of value. Values have remained relatively stable during this period in the
subject neighborhood. No adjustments to the sales are necessary or warranted.
General Location: This category compares a property’s specific location to that of the
subject. The sales analyzed are located in the general area of the Golden Gate Estates
areas of northeastern Collier County.
Zoning and Future Land Use: This category is a key component for choosing sales
for this report. The Master Plan states that parcels immediately adjacent to commercial
zoning within the Neighborhood Centers located at the intersection of Everglades
Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard may qualify for Conditional Uses Subdistrict
under the transitional conditional use provision of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of this
Master Plan Element. Properties eligible for Neighborhood Center Transitional
Conditional Use shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood
Center. The subject is already approved for a CPUD and factors heavily into the
adjustment of the sales. The sales used in this report are the only and best indicators to
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
42
value the subject.
Access/Exposure: Amount and quality of road frontage are also key factors that the
market considers when purchasing commercial properties in this market.
Comparable Sales Map
Parent Tract
Sale No. 1 OR 5106/317
In 12/14 sold for $4.63/SF
Sale No. 2 OR 5020/3283
For 3 parcels in 3/14 sold for $10.19/SF
Sale No. 3 OR 5116/2795
In 1/14 sold for $9.43/SF
Sale No. 4 OR 5002/2720
In 12/13 sold for $7.50/SF
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
43
Aerial Comparable Sales Map
Parent Tract
Sale No. 1 OR 5106/317
In 12/14 sold for $4.63/SF
Sale No.3 OR 5116/2795
In 1/14 sold for $9.43/SF
Sale No. 2 OR 5020/3283
For 3 parcels in 3/14 sold for $10.19/sf
Sale No. 4 OR 5002/2720
In 12/13 sold for $7.50/SF
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
44
SALES ANALYSIS CHART
Sale Number Subject 1 2 3 4
OR
Book/Page N/A 5106/317 5020/3283 5116/2795 5002/2720
Address N/A 5349 Golden
Gate Pkwy.
4087 Green
Blvd.
11965 Collier
Blvd.
Golden Gate Blvd.
West
Location
Golden Gate E.
& Everglades
Boulevards.
North side
GGP, West of
Collier Blvd.
Northwest
corner of Green
& Collier Blvds.
West side of
Collier Blvd. ¼
mile N. GGP
Southeast corner
Golden Gate Blvd.
West &
Wilson Blvd.
County Tax
Parcel No.(s) 40680040000 36319960009
751800000120
751800000421
751800000489 00288800006 37221120208
Grantor N/A Pfpl, LLC Wynn
Properties, Inc.
Dorothy I.
Martin
Liberty Bank,
F.S.B.
Grantee N/A Milutico, LLC Collier Health
Services, Inc.
Pop Florida
Properties, LLC
Central Florida
Real Estate
Owned, LLC.
Sale Date N/A 12/19/2014 3/18/2014 1/28/2014 5/15/2014
Sale Price N/A $76,600 $2,900,000 $595,000 $490,000
Land Size
(SF) 237,838 16,553 284,629 63,070 65,340
Price/SF n/a $4.63 $10.19 $9.43 $7.50
County Tax
Use Code
10-Vacant
Commercial
10-Vacant
Commercial
10-Vacant
Commercial
10-Vacant
Commercial
10-Vacant
Commercial
Future
Land Use
Commercial PUD
approval with
Mater Site Plan
approved.
Commercial
Mixed Use
Activity
Center
Subdistrict
Golden Gate
Estates
Commercial
Infill Subdistrict.
Golden Gate
Commercial
Estates
Neighborhood
Shopping
Center
Subdistrict
“E”-Estates zoning
district via the
Neighborhood
Center
Land Cleared No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Topography
Road Grade
Average
Level Grade
Good
Level Grade
Good
Level Grade
Good
Level Grade
Good
Level Grade
Highest &
Best Use
Future
Commercial
Development
Future
Commercial
Development
Future
Commercial
Development
Future
Commercial
Development
Future
Commercial
Development
QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
Conditions of Sale Similar (0) Similar (0) Similar (0) Similar (0)
Market Conditions Similar (0) Similar (0) Similar (0) Similar (0)
Location Inferior (+) Superior (---) Superior (---) Superior (-)
Zoning/Future Land Use Similar (0) Similar (0) Similar (0) Inferior (+)
Size Smaller (+) Similar (0) Smaller (+) Similar (0)
Site Conditions Superior (-) Superior (-) Superior (-) Superior (-)
Overall comparison per SF to
Subject Property
Similar to
$4.64
Superior less
than $10.19
Superior less
than $9.43
Superior less than
$7.50
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
45
Comparable Listings Map
Subject Property
Listing No. 1 $3.79/SF
Listing No. 2
$10.51/SF
Listing No. 3
$3.15/SF
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
46
Listing Number Subject - 1 2 3
Name - Location
Big Bear Plaza NEC
Golden Gate Blvd. &
Everglades Blvd.
William Vine
SWC Golden Gate Blvd.
& Everglades Blvd.
Fakahatchee Plaza
NWC Golden Gate Blvd. &
Everglades Blvd.
County Parcel No. 40680040000 40930720009 40629000001
Years or Months
Listed Over 2 years 9 months Over 2 years
Listing Price $900,000 $2,500,000 $750,000
Land Size (SF) 237,838 total 237,838 total 237,838 total includes R/W’s
170,755 excludes R/W’s
Price/SF $3.79 $10.51 $3.15
County Tax Use
Code 10-Vacant Commercial 0-Vacant Residential 10-Vacant Commercial
Zoning - Future
Land Use
Estates – Mixed Use
District, Neighborhood
Subdistrict. This site has
an approved Commercial
PUD Ordinance
Eligible to be rezoned to
allow commercial.
Estates – Mixed Use
District, Neighborhood
Subdistrict. There is no
site plan on record at the
county.
Estates – Mixed Use District,
Neighborhood Subdistrict.
This site has an approved
Commercial PUD Ordinance
Site Plan
Has Mater site plan
that is approved for
Commercial PUD.
See data book.
None
Has site plan that is
approved for Commercial
PUD.
See data book
Land Cleared Site
Condition No & Heavily Wooded No & Heavily Wooded No & Heavily Wooded
Topography
Road Grade
Average
Level Grade
Average
Level Grade
Average
Level Grade
Highest & Best
Use
Future Commercial
Development
Future Commercial
Development
Future Commercial
Development
Qualitative Analysis
Conditions of Sale - Similar (0) Similar (0)
Market Conditions - Similar (0) Similar (0)
Location (Corner) - Similar (0) Similar (0)
Zoning/Future
Land Use - Inferior (+) Inferior (+) Gas station &
Fast food not allowed.
Site Plan - Inferior (+) Similar (0)
Size - Similar (0) Similar (0)
Site Conditions - Similar (0) Similar (0)
Overall
Comparison
per SF to
Subject Property
Less than $3.79 Overpriced listing
at $10.51 Inferior more than $3.15
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
47
Sales Discussion Continued
The subject is located at a corner and most likely can be developed with neighborhood
commercial improvements. In fact, it already has a CPUD Master plan approved. This
factor as well as location is given most consideration in estimating the subject’s value.
Sales 2, 3 and 4 are located within the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use areas.
These were the best and most recent commercial sales found in the eastern part of
Collier County. Sale 4 is located within the Estates section of Collier County and is
closest in proximity. This is a good indicator of value but has a superior location
because it is farther west than the subject is and has more development surrounding it
than the subject.
Sale 2 and 3 are located along Collier Boulevard, which is a main thoroughfare similar
to the subject, however, it has much more traffic. Therefore, these two sales are
considered superior to the subject. Sale 1 is located in an older section of the county
called Golden Gate. This eastern, older established area shows how much commercial
properties have been selling. All sales were adjusted accordingly. See previous
adjustment chart for each sale analysis. The sales ranged in price from $4.64 to $10.19
per square foot.
All of the listings, including the subject are located at the intersection of Golden Gate
Boulevard East and Everglades Boulevard. These list prices set the ceiling for valuing
the subject and are the best indicators. The list prices are $3.79 (subject), $10.51 and
$3.15 per square foot respectively.
According to real estate broker, Matthew Stepan, CCIM with Premier Commercial in
Bonita Springs, there was a recent offer made on his listing number 3 for $600,000 or
$2.52 per square foot, however, the offer was considered too low and the seller rejected
it. This listing has an approved CPUD Master Plan approval like the subject; however,
gas station and fast food use was not part of this property’s Master Plan approval. In
fact, it prohibits their use. It is our opinion, that fast food and gas station parcels
command a higher price for the site than other types of neighborhood commercial uses.
Based on this factor, this sale is considered inferior to the subject property.
Based on our analysis, we conclude that the subject would most likely sell between the
price of listing number 3 at $3.15 per square foot and the subject’s list price of $3.79 per
square foot. Based on our analysis and considering the risk and costs involved to get
specific site plan approval, a value conclusion between $3.15 (listing 3) and $3.79
(subject) is reasonable.
Therefore, we conclude a value for the Parent Tract at $3.50 per square foot of land.
The total value is calculated as follows:
237,838 SF @ $3.50 per square foot = $832,433
Rounded to:
PARENT TRACT MARKET VALUE VIA SALES COMPARISON: $833,000
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
48
VALUATION OF THE PART TAKEN
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
49
PART TAKEN - Proposed Use
In front of the parent tract is an existing perpetual, non-exclusive public roadway
easement. This area also appears to function as drainage area for the existing road.
The proposed easement is for modifying, improving and expanding the existing roadway
for the intersection improvements. The taking is a perpetual non-exclusive, road right-of
way, drainage and utilities easement (RDUE) is at the front of the parent tract and will be
used in perpetuity. See following sketch for legal description, dimensions, shape and size.
No significant improvements are located within the proposed easement.
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
50
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
51
Value of the Proposed Easement
The total impact of the acquisition cannot be estimated until the appraiser determines:
1) the loss of present utility, 2) the loss of future utility, 3) the accessory rights to be
acquired and 4) the obligation of the parties.
The easement is non-exclusive, perpetual and will essentially take most of the owner's
bundle of rights. For the most part the property owner will only be allowed to utilize the
land for density calculations.
Considering the restrictive nature of the easement, we have compensated the property
owner for 99% of the full fee simple value for the land underlying the Parcel (s).
The underlying land value for the parent tract is $3.50 per square foot. The same unit
value is applied when calculating the value of the land underlying the proposed
easement parcel.
The value of drainage easement (s) is calculated as follows:
54,401 square feet @ $3.50 per square foot x 99% = $188,500
Rounded to:
LAND VALUE OF EASEMENT PARCEL $189,000
Improvements in the Easement
No significant improvements are located within the proposed easement.
Summary of Values for the Easement
Land: $ 189,000
Improvements: $ 0
Total Value of the Easement $189,000
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
52
VALUATION OF THE REMAINDER
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
53
REMAINDER – Effects on the Remainder
The remainder will retain the same shape as it did before the taking. The taking includes
three easements in the same area in perpetuity.
The remainder will contain the same amount of square feet as it did before the taking,
however, the area along the front of the site will be encumbered by the easement. The
remainder has ample depth and can still be developed the same way as before the
taking. Therefore, the taking has no adverse impact on the function, marketability or
value of the remainder and there are no severance damages to the remainder.
HIGHEST AND BEST USE
In our analysis of highest and best use of the remainder, we have considered the same
methodology and criteria used in the highest and best use of the parent tract.
We have concluded that the remainder will continue to have the same highest and best
use as before the acquisition, which is for future commercial development.
Valuation of the Remainder
Based on our analysis of the sales utilized in the value of the parent tract, we have
concluded a remainder value based on $3.50 per square foot, which is applied to 183,437
square feet (237,838 square feet – 54,401 square feet = 183,437 square feet) of the
remainder unencumbered by the RDUE.
$0.035 per square foot ($3.50 less 99% = $0.035) has been applied to the 183,437
square feet of the remainder that is located within the easement parcel.
The value of the remainder is calculated as follows:
183,437 square feet @ $3.50 per square foot = $ 642,030
54,401 square feet @ $0.035 per square foot = $ 1,904
Total = $ 643,934
Rounded to:
MARKET VALUE OF THE REMAINDER $ 644,000
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
54
SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC
55
1. Value Before the Taking:(Land)833,000$
2. Value of Part Taken: (Land)
189,000$
644,000$
644,000$
-$
-$
6. Special Benefits:-$
7. Damages (5-6):-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
189,000$
-$
-$
-$
189,000$
Value of Part Taken - Parcel 391 RDUE (Land):
Value of Part Taken - Parcel 391 RDUE (Improvements):
Cost to Cure:
Damages:
Total Compensation
11. Damages Uncurable Severance (7-10):
12. Cost to Cure:
13. Improvements Cured, but paid in (2):
14. Net Cost to Cure (If less than item (10), cost is
justified unless the cost is minor):
Summary of Compensation
Feasibilty of Cost to Cure
8. Value of Remainder (Cured):
9 Value of Remainder (Uncured):
10. Damages (Curable) (8-9):
Summary of Values & Compensation
Partial Acquisition
3. Value of Remainder As Part of Whole (1-2):
4. Value of Remander Uncured:
5. Damages, Total Uncured (3-4):
QUALIFICATIONS OF FRANK J. CARDO, MAI
President of Cardo Appraisal Group, LLC
State-Certified General Real Estate Appraiser, State of Florida, License No. RZ1190
Overview
More than 30 years experience in all facets of real estate appraising and consulting, as well as
brokerage of Florida properties since 1983.
Qualified Real Estate Valuation Expert Witness expert witness in Palm Beach, Broward, Dade,
Indian River, Martin and Collier County courts; extensive testimony experience in cases involving
property disputes, condemnation, bankruptcy, foreclosure and a wide range of real property
valuation issues.
Professional Experience and Affiliations
CARDO APPRAISAL GROUP, LLC, PRESIDENT AND OWNER.
Prior Experience: 27 years with Anderson & Carr, Inc., vice president and principal, 1998 – 2010.
Member Appraisal Institute (MAI)
Member, Board of Directors, Appraisal Institute, South Florida Chapter, 2001 - 05, and 2009 to 2012.
House Committee Chairman, Appraisal Institute, South Florida Chapter, 2000 to 2012.
Member, the Education Committee, Appraisal Institute - Palm Beach Chapter, 1992 - 93.
Appraisals and Related Projects
Apartment Buildings Nursing Homes Banks
Office Buildings Houses of Worship Residences - All Types
Auto Dealerships’ Restaurants Service Stations
Department Stores Shopping Centers Funeral Homes
Special Purpose Buildings Hotels - Motels Store Buildings
Industrial Buildings Supermarkets Leasehold Interests
Mobile Home Parks Medical Buildings Vacant Lots & Acreage
Warehouses Marinas Residential Project
Adult Congregate Living Facilities Easements Citrus Groves
Condominiums - Residential & Office Schools Agricultural Properties
Eminent Domain Appraisals Road Right-of-Ways Golf Courses
Education
B.S., Florida State University, College of Business, (Double-major in Real Estate and Risk Management Insurance),
1983.
Successfully completed more than a dozen post-graduate courses and seminars through the Appraisal Institute.
APPRAISAL DATA BOOK
Collier County Project Road Number: 876
for
Intersection Improvements to
Golden Gate East Boulevard & Everglades Boulevard
Roadway, Drainage & Utility Easements (RDUE)
for
Parcel Numbers
368 RDUE, 370 RDUE, 380 RDUE, 382 RDUE & 391 RDUE
TAKING SKETCH
A-1
ZONING MAPS
Subject’s Map
Parent Tract Zoning
Designation
A-2
North Side Intersection Maps
Parent Tract
A-3
Parent Tract
A-4
A-5
Parent Tract Land Use Plan
Parent Tract Land Use Plan
Parent Tract Land Use Plan
A-6
A-7
Parent Tract Land Use Plan
A-8
A-9
A-10
A-11
A-12
A-13
A-14
A-15
A-16
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING
Parent Tract
A-17
APPROVED COMMERCIAL CENTERS AT GOLDEN GLADES BLVD. E & EVERGLADES BLVD.
A-18
Land Sale 1 – OR Book/Page – 5106/317
A-19
Sale No. 1 OR 5106/317
In 12/14 sold for $4.63/SF
Sale No. 1 OR 5106/317
In 12/14 sold for $4.63/SF
A-20
Sale No. 1 OR 5106/317
In 12/14 sold for $4.63/SF
Land Sale 2 – OR Book/Page – 5020/3283
A-21
Sale No. 2 OR 5020/3283
For 3 parcels in 3/14 sold for $10.19/sf
Sale No. 2 OR 5020/3283
For 3 parcels in 3/14 sold for $10.19/sf
Land Sale 3 – OR Book/Page – 5116/2795
A-22
Sale No.3 OR 5116/2795
In 1/14 sold for $9.43/SF
Sale No.3 OR 5116/2795
In 1/14 sold for $9.43/SF
Land Sale 4 - OR Book/Page – 5002/2720
A-23
Sale No. 4 OR 5002/2720
In 12/13 sold for $7.50/SF
Sale No. 4 OR 5002/2720
In 12/13 sold for $7.50/SF
A-24
Sale No. 4 OR 5002/2720
In 12/13 sold for $7.50/SF
A-25
A-26
Parent Tract
Size = 51,000
SF
A-27
Parent Tract
Size = 51,000
SF
Listing No. 1 – Big Bear Plaza - Everglades Blvd. Naples, Fl 34120 – See ordinance in later section
A-28
A-29
A-30
A-31
Listing No. 2 – SWC Golden Gate Blvd. & Everglades Blvd. Naples, Fl 34120
A-32
A-33
A-34
A-35
Listing No. 3 – Fakahatchee Plaza - NWC of Golden Gate Blvd. & Everglades Blvd., Naples, 34120
A-36
A-37
A-38
A-39
BIG BEAR PLAZA ORDINANCE
A-40
Snips from subject’s approved ordinance – See previous page