The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Backup 06/23/2016 COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER HEARINGS BACKUP DOCUMENTS JUNE 23, 2016 Court Reporter AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY,JUNE 23,2016 IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING&REGULATION BUILDING,2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE,NAPLES, FLORIDA INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF PRIOR MEETING MINUTES: May 26,2016 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160000263 — SD San Marino, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended, the San Marino Planned Unit Development, to add a traffic development commitment relating to temporary construction access for Parcel B, to amend a traffic development commitment to reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel B,to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B, to amend a deviation to allow for a 12-foot tall fence, wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south, and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the location of the temporary and permanent access points, and the reconfigured roadways, lakes and residential areas, for the property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 235± acres. [Coordinator: Eric Jo nson AICP, CFM,Principal Planner] B. PETITION DR-PL20150002617—Petitioner,TT of Naples,Inc.requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks nine total deviations, including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16, relating to standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area; one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, relating to plant material standards for required landscaping; and five deviations from LDC Section 5.05.08, relating to architectural design standards for blank walls, roof treatments, building colors and materials, and parking structures, for a proposed Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.15± acres, located on the north side of Davis Blvd.,just west of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator Daniel Smith,\AICP, Principal Planner] Note: This item is withdrawn by Petitioner and will be heard at a later date. C. PETITION DR—PL20130002268—Petitioner,Wal-Mart Stores East,LP, requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks relief LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6, relating to buffer and screening standard requirements; from LDC Section 4.06.05 C., relating to foundation planting requirements along retail building facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.2, relating to building design feature requirements for primary facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.4, relating to variation in massing requirements for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross building area; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.5, relating to building design treatment requirements for all building facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8,relating to detail feature requirements for blank wall areas on a building; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.10, relating to roof edge and parapet treatment requirements for buildings larger than 5,000 square feet in gross building area; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.12, relating to entryway/customer entrance treatment requirements for single tenant buildings; from LDC Section 5.05.08 D.3, relating to design standard requirements for mercantile buildings; from LDC Section 5.05.08 E.3, relating to site design standard requirements for service function areas and facilities, for a Wal-Mart expansion redevelopment project consisting of 17.21±acres of land, located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41), approximately 1,000 feet east of Airport-Pulling_Road, in Section 12, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Daniel Smith, AICP, Principal Planner] 5. OTHER BUSINESS 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS 7. ADJOURN HEX 6-23-16 PDI—PL20160000263 Ann P. Jennejohn SAN MARINO From: JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:36 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael; Patricia L. Morgan; Neet, Virginia; Rodriguez, Wanda; Lang, Ashley; Kendall, Marcia; Stone, Scott Subject: Ad Request PDI San Marino RPUD Attachments: Ad Request.docx;Ad Request Signed.pdf; San Marino RPUD 2x3 Map.pdf Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Also, please send confirmation for approval prior to processing. This item is scheduled for the Hearing Examiner on June 23, 2016. Respectfully, Eric L.Johnson,AICP,CFM Principal Planner Growth Management Department-Planning&Regulation Zoning Division-Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,FL 34104 phone:239-252-2931 fax: 239-252-6503 LEED GREENfir it ASSOCIATE Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Rodriguez, Wanda • Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:25 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: JohnsonEric; Stone, Scott Subject: RE:Ad Request PDI San Marino RPUD The ad request is good, OK to proceed. Wanda Rodriguez, ACT Advanced Certified Tara(egaC Office of the County Attorney (239)252-8400 From: JohnsonEric Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:36 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: BellowsRay; BosiMichael; patricia.morgan@clerk.collier.fl.us; NeetVirginia; RodriguezWanda; LangAshley; KendallMarcia; StoneScott Subject: Ad Request PDI San Marino RPUD Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Also, please send confirmation for approval prior to processing. This item is scheduled for the Hearing Examiner on June 23, 2016. Respectfully, Eric L.Johnson,AICP,CFM Principal Planner Growth Management Department-Planning&Regulation Zoning Division-Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,FL 34104 phone: 239-252-2931 fax: 239-252-6503 LEER GREEN Co er County ASSOCIATE Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn on behalf of Minutes and Records Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:39 PM To: 'JohnsonEric'; Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: RE:Ad Request PDI San Marino RPUD Hi Eric, I'll sevtd your (NDN) proof for review and final approval as soovt as we receive it from Naples Daily News. Avtvt Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Mivtutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 239-2.52-8408 From:JohnsonEric [mailto:EricJohnson@colliergov.net] Sent:Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:36 PM To: Minutes and Records<MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com> Cc: Bellows, Ray<RayBellows@colliergov.net>; Bosi, Michael<MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; Patricia L. Morgan <patricia.morgan@collierclerk.com>; Neet,Virginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; Rodriguez,Wanda <WandaRodriguez@colliergov.net>; Lang, Ashley<ashleylang@colliergov.net>; Kendall, Marcia <MarciaKendall@colliergov.net>; Stone, Scott<ScottStone@colliergov.net> Subject:Ad Request PDI San Marino RPUD Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Also, please send confirmation for approval prior to processing. This item is scheduled for the Hearing Examiner on June 23, 2016. Respectfully, Eric L.Johnson,AICP,CFM Principal Planner Growth Management Department-Planning&Regulation Zoning Division-Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 phone:239-252-2931 fax: 239-252-6503 1 May 25, 2016 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on June 3. 2016~and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Eric Johnson, Principal Planner in the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 1/4 paqe advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION:ZONING [Zoning Services Section) FUND&COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number:076397 AM' Authorized o es':nee signature for HEX Advertising PL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,June 23, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples, FL 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160000263—SD San Marino, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended, the San Marino Planned Unit Development, to add a traffic development commitment relating to temporary construction access for Parcel B, to amend a traffic development commitment to reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel B, to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B, to amend a deviation to allow for a 12- foot tall fence, wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south, and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the location of the temporary and permanent access points, and the reconfigured roadways, lakes and residential areas, for the property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 235± acres. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one weekprior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the p p g Collier County Growth Management Department,Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida I � j) � \ , ¥ ;! | § °:1 ■ || I ! ` F| ;@ } BSIfiDig COLLIER ° �� 2 = | §(` ' \ � �; \� . \ E� %§ z \ . & NDN Account #076397 Corporate Account #507876 May 25, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples News Media 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 Re: PDI-PL20160000263 Display Notice (w/MAP) Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice (w/Map) Friday, June 3, 2016 and send the Affidavit of Publication to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500168030 I May 25, 2016 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on June 3, 2016, and send proof of publication to the Board Minutes and Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 401, Naples, Florida 34112. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section} PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500168030 Account Number: NDN 076397/507876 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,June 23, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples, FL 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160000263 — SD San Marino, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended, the San Marino Planned Unit Development, to add a traffic development commitment relating to temporary construction access for Parcel B, to amend a traffic development commitment to reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel B, to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B, to amend a deviation to allow for a 12-foot tall fence, wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south, and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the location of the temporary and permanent access points, and the reconfigured roadways, lakes and residential areas, for the property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 235± acres. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101,Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida | ! 4 § § ! A E§ ! § �[| !! §| I ` ;a r C/F4 t )% t"` h�. g i\ jPE k; 2 z § \ � § Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:53 PM To: legals@naplesnews.com Subject: PDI-PL20160000263 Attachments: PDI-PL20160000263.doc; PDI-PL20160000263.doc; PDI-PL20160000263.pdf Please advertise the attacked (w/MAP) OK Friday, June 3, 2.016. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:27 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: Proof 1112182 Attachments: N DN B 1112182.pdf Please find proof attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist 'SaptoDai(}i:Scum I &syr 'moi Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gorinu,naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com • 1 I PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, FL 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160000263—SD San Marino, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended, the San Marino Planned Unit Development, to add a traffic development commitment relating to temporary construction access for Parcel B, to amend a traffic development commitment to reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel B,to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B, to amend a deviation to allow for a 12-foot tall fence,wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south, and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the location of the temporary and permanent access points, and the reconfigured roadways, lakes and residential areas, for the property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,Collier County, Florida,consisting of 235±acres. G" -75/COLLIER u pI EAST ALLIGATOR ALLEY ' BOULEVARD TOLL TOLL (S'R'84) 0 COMMERCIAL PLAZA -PLAZA RT CENTER R.V. COMMERCE Q. COMMEo OP 5' —CENTER 3 2 1 6 Om K FOREST GLEN CEDAR U OF NAPLES HAMMOCK _ ---,,.......;•000001.° PROJECT NAPLES HERITAGE LOCATION COLE AND COUNTRY CLUB SAN MARINO HACIENDA LAKES NAPLES NATIONAL (DRI) GOLF CLUB 0 11 / 7 WILLOW RUN HOMES OF ISLANDIA LASIP CONSERVAPON AREA NAPLES LAKES FIRST (ORI) COUNTRY CLUB ASSEMBLY 14 HACIENDA LAKES —1 13 18 15 MINISTRIES All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252- 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.1112182 June 3.2016 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Johnson Eric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:56 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn;wanda.rodriguez@colliergov.net; Stone, Scott Subject: RE: San Marino HEX Petition PDI-PL20130000263 (June 23 HEX) Looks good to me. Eric Johnson Principal Planner Original Message From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:Ann.Jevtvtejo<nvt@collierclerk.conn] Sevtt: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:52 PM To: wanda.rodriguez@colliergov.vtet; StoneScott <ScottStovte@colliergov.vtet>; JohvtsovtEric <EricJohnson@coil iergov.net> Subject: San Marino HEX Petition PP(-P1_20130000.263 (June 23 HEX) Hi there, The Savt Marino Legal Notice is attached for your review and approval; running Friday June 3rd for a June 23rd HEX Hearing. Please review at your earliest convenience and let wte know of any chanes or if it looks O.K. for publication. a.s.a.p. Thank you. Ann Jevwtejohvt l3oard Minutes & Records Department From: Gori, Ivovtvte [ivonne.gori@naplesvtews.cowt] Sevtt: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:26 PM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Subject: Proof 1112182 Please find proof attached. Thanks! 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 9:16 AM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: RE: San Marino HEX Petition PDI-PL20130000263 (June 23 HEX) The ad is good, OK to proceed. Wanda Rodriguez, ACP Advanced Certified Paralegal Office of the County Attorney (239) 252-8400 Original Message From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.cowq Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 8:21- AM To: RodriguezWanda Subject: San Marino HEX Petition PDI-PLZO13OOOO263 (June 2.3 HEX) Hi Wanda, The San Marino Legal Notice is attached for your review and approval; running Friday June 3rd for a June 23rd HEX Hearing. Please review at your earliest convenience and let me know of any changes or if it looks O.K. for publication a.s.a.p. Thank you. Ann Jennejohn I3oard Minutes & Records Department From: Gori, Ivonne [ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:26 PM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 12:47 PM To: Gori, Ivonne Subject: RE: Proof 1112182 Attachments: image001.png Looks great, Ivonne! Please publish this notice Friday, Juvte 3, 2016. Thank you, Ann Jennejohn Board Minutes & Records Department From: Gori, Ivonne [ivovtvte.gori@vtaplesvtews.cowtj Sevtt: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:26 PM To: APIA P. Jennejohn Subject: Proof 1112182 Please find proof attached. Thanks! Ivovtvte Gori Legal Advertising Specialist [cid:iwtage001.pvtg@OiD11376l3.64gC3ECO) Office: 23 9.213.6061 I vovtv<e.gori@vtaplesvtews.cowt<wtailto:Ivovtvte.gori@vtaplesvtews.cowt> NaplesNews.cowt 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, FL 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160000263—SD San Marino, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended, the San Marino Planned Unit Development, to add a traffic development commitment relating to temporary construction access for Parcel B, to amend a traffic development commitment to reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel B,to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B, to amend a deviation to allow for a 12-foot tall fence,wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south, and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the location of the temporary and permanent access points, and the reconfigured roadways, lakes and residential areas, for the property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 235±acres. GA,'" , ALLIGATOR ALLEY � I-75/COLLIER EAST `�BOULEVARD TOLL / TOLL (E R.64) COMMERCIAL PLAZA \PLAZA 047, WESTPORT CENTER RV. ^— 9?- COMMERCE O e.9' —CENTER Q 3 T 2 1 8: FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES CEDAR U HAMMOCK PROJECT NAPLES HERITAGE I LOCATION _ GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB SAN MARINO HACIENDA LAKES NAPLES NATIONAL (DRI) GOLF CLUB . 10 11 /12 WILLOW RUN - HOMES OF ISLANDIA LASIP CONSERVATION AREA NAPLES LAKES FIRST I (DRI) COUNTRY CLUB • ASSEMBLY 14 HACIENDAII LAKES 13 15 MINISTRIESI All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252- 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.1112182 June 3.2016 4. ?'apIrø BIaiI wø NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# COLLIER COUNTY HEX 1112182 PUBLIC HEARING Pub Dates June 3,2016 (Sign ure of affiant) 26--"/7 RhaamaidwillidllhodbYdlimillhee Sworn to and subscribed before me 1 ;0 4,4•, IVONNE GORI This June 08, 16 ,`�, Notary Public-State o1 Florida • E Commission *FF 900t)�0 , My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 ;�� ' '� ' V Banded through National Notary Asn. (Signatur of affiant) ' NAPLES DAILY news a Friday,June 3.2016015A Presidential campaign 2016 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE In pursuit of GOP unity,Ryan NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING says he'll vote for Trump Notice is hereby given that a nubile hearing will beheld by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 AM.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Roam,at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Room 609/610,Naples FL 34104,to By Steve Peoples consider: and Scott Bauer Associated Press PETITION DR-PL20150002617-Petitioner,TT of Naples,Inc.requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F end seeks nine JANESVILLE,Wis.-House total deviations,including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16,relating to K �n Speaker Paul Ryan en- standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore 0) 0 dorsed Donald Trump's S, Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area;one deviation from LOC Section 4.06.05, I Z bid for president There- . relating to plant material standards for required landscaping;and five deviations horn — day,bringing an end to Sy LDC Section 5.05.08,relating to architectural design standards for blank walls,roof the extraordinary public �, M c-/ `‘.,11`y. treatments,building colors and materials,and parking structures,fora proposed C < split between the GOP's Porsche dealershi presumptive White House p project consisting of 2.150 acres,located on the north side of W nominee and the nation's r Davis Blvd.,just west of Airport-Pulling Road,In Section 2,Township 50 South,Range O I top Republican in office. II 25 East,Collier County,Florida, 0 — I had friends wishing L 0 I wouldn't support him. .ss°even s d Q J I had friends wishing I House Speaker Paul Ryan,R-Wis.,talks Thursday with The 0:1 would,"Ryan said in an Associated Press in Janesville,Wis. f @ run'ne'r exclusive interview with 7A 14 O Q r m The Associated Press."I Paul Ryan,"Trump wrote. struggled to identify a vi- i V Z < d really didn't feel any pres- "We will both be working able alternative,many be- a sure,other than my goal very hard to Make Ameri- lieved it was only a matter Daub BLVD is to make sure that were ca Great Again!" of time before Ryan fell in unified so that we're at full There are still some GOP line.The endorsement,he •• strength in the fall so we leaders who say they won't said,was not the product r can win the election." support Trump,including of any deal with the bit- "DT Ryan's announcement, 2012 Republican presiders- lionaire developer,but a Z'e o made in a newspaper col- tial nominee Mitt Romney, decision based on"an un- C umn published in his Wis- who tapped Ryan as his derstandingofour mutual- O consin hometown,marks running mate four years ly agreed upon principles." 4 N a significant step for a Re- ago.A day earlier,Romney Ryan said he specifically Al interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materiels used In publican Party trying to signaled he'd support epos- wanted to go once pos N come together ahead of a sible third-party candidate approach to executive pow- presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. general election matchup instead of the presumptive er,judicial appointments >` l'IliC against likely Democratic Republican nominee. and his position on aborti Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be N CLO nominee Hillary Clinton. Ryan himself acknowl- "Those conversations reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department,Zoning Division, N And Ryan made clear he edged he continues to have took some time,"he said, Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL. >' CQ- had Clinton on his mind concerns hump's combat- adding("I feel much more O t 0 when he decided to join the ive style but said after a se- comfortable that he's in the The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person N C _ 0 ranks of Republicans who ries of conversations with same page with us.Most decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with > II) 0 I have slawlycome around to Trump,he's confident he importantly,it is obvious respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of -0 d) C) a) backing Trump,the brash and the HouseRepublicans that Hillary Clinton is not." that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record < < Cl) 0 billionaire few expected to he leads as speaker will be Ryan ended aweekslong of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon emerge as the party'snomi- able to work with him as standoff with Trump min- which the appeal is to be based. nee when the campaign be- president on their agenda. Utes before the interview gan in earnest last year. "We obviously have a by outlining his support If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to "This to me is about different kind of style and for the New York billion- participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of saving the country and tone.That's very clear. aim in a column published certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division preventing a third progres- Anyone who knows any- online by The Janesville located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,Florida 341125356,(238)252- sive,liberal term,which is thing about uslmuws that," Gazette. 8380,at least two days prix to the meeting. what a Clinton presidency Ryan said.'But what really, He had shocked the po- would do,"Ryan said. ultimately matters is how Rtical world last month by Mark Shain, Trump celebrated the best can we make sure refusing to endorse Trump to endorsement on his favor- these principles and poll- once the real estate mogul Chief Hearing Examiner N ite venue,Twitter. cies get enacted in 2017." became the last major Re- Collier County,Florida CNI a) "So great to have the en- As the GOP's so-called publican presidential con- K a mom dorsement and support of "Never Trump"movement tender still in the race. NC. June 3.2016 ' 03PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE CNI v Q NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Z en Z Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 AM.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Examiner(HE)Q at 9:00 AM.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room,et 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Room 609/610,Naples FL 34104,to Meeting Room,at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Room 609/610,Naples,FL 34104,to consider. consider: N PETITION DR-PL20130002268-Petitioner,Wal-Mart Stores East,LP,requests PETITION NO.PDI-PL20160000263-SD San Marino,LLC requests an insubstantial _Q approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LOC Section 10.02.03.F and change to Ordinance No.2000-10,as amended,the San Marino Planned Unit E seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6,relating to buffer and screening standard Development,to add a traffic development commitment relating to temporary requirements;from LDC Section 4.06.05 C.,relating to foundation planting requirements i along retail building facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.2,relating to building design construction access for Parcel B,to amend a traffic development S to t commitment to C) Z N feature requirements for reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel B,to amend a deviation Q variation primary facades;from LDC Section 5feet o C.4,relating to to require sidewalks on both sides of the main ent d of Parcel B,to amend a C T uldn in massing requirements for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross entry roe I building area;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.5,relating to building tlesign treatmentdeviation to apow for a 12-foot tall fence,wall or berth along the sharetl boundary with _2 Willow Run PUD to the south,and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect requirements for all building facades:from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8,relating to detail the location of the '1r feature requirements for blank wall areas on a building;from LDC Section 5.05.08 temporary and permanent access points,and the reconfigured Z O C.10,relating to roof edge and parapet treatment requirements for buildings larger roadways,lakes and residential areas,for the property located on the east side of -0 to N O than 5,000 square feet in gross building area;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.12,relating Collier Boulevard,approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard,in Section 11, < C 0 0 to entryway/customer entrance treatment requirements for single tenant buildings; Township 50 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida,conceding of 2350 acres. from LDC Section 5.05.08 D.3,relating to design standard requirements for mercantile buildings;from LDC Section 5.05.08 E.3,relating to site design standard requirements Ipl \— for service function areas and facilities.fora Wal-Mart expansion redevelopment T� �"' project consisting of 17.21c acres of land,located on the north side of Tamiami Trail ` "` East N.S.41),approximately 1,000 feet east of Airport-Pulling Road,in Section 12, ✓c` Township 50 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida I :' PROJECT 6 IAOATION -- >a� au PROJECT `era ' LOCATION 1e „ ___/f,a., eat e a.; _A mese �^I EI �— . . 0. m ,. �, ,a 0 ..,. xm All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in 0 All Interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materiels used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. CD presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department,Zoning Division, reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department,Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL. Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person NO The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,end for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record =UI that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record Inclotles the testimony and evidence upon COof the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. which the appeal is to be based. 44 Ce O If you area person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to If you area person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to • �ala� Z participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of Participate in this proceeding,you are caroled,at no cost to you,to the provision of LGIA W certain assistance.Please contact the Collier CDunry Fecilhies Management Division certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division glit located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,Florida 34112-5356,(239)252- located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,Florida 34112-5356,(239)252- , 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Mark Stream, �j1�,, Chief Hearing ExaminerChief j Collier County,Florida Collier County,Examiner Florida Mramemill >a No.1110643 June 3.2018 N.1114112 Y.I.illa ZiM CIS L OFFICE OF THE COUNTYATTORNEY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Minutes & Records, Clerk of Courts FROM: Wanda Rodriguez,ACP :1,7- DATE: June 30,2016 RE: Hearing Examiner Decision(s) from June 23,2016. Attached is a signed HEX decision from the Hearing Examiner hearing on June 23, 2016. One additional decision from this date will be forwarded at a later time. Attachment: HEX No. 2016—22 [05-00A-01253/813782/1]744 HEX NO. 2016—22 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160000263 — SD San Marino, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended, the San Marino Planned Unit Development, to add a traffic development commitment relating to temporary construction access for Parcel B, to amend a traffic development commitment to reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel B, to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B, to amend a deviation to allow for a 12-foot tall fence, wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south, and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the location of the temporary and permanent access points, and the reconfigured roadways, lakes and residential areas, for the property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 235± acres. DATE OF HEARING: June 23, 2016 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Sections 10.02.13 E.1 and 10.02.13 E.2 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition should be approved. ANALYSIS: Five citizens attended the neighborhood information meeting (NIM). The applicant revised their proposed changes as a result of the NIM. No correspondence was received in opposition and there were no members of the public attending this hearing. The advertised title describes changes relating to a temporary construction access, but those changes were withdrawn prior to the hearing and therefore were not included in this Decision. DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition Number PDI-PL20160000263, filed by Alexis Crespo, AICP, of Waldrop Engineering, representing SD San Marino, LLC, with respect to the property as described in the San Marino PUD, Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended, for the following insubstantial changes: • to amend a traffic development commitment to reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel B; [16-CPS-01522/1262649/1]69 1 of 2 • to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B; • to amend a deviation to allow for a 12-foot tall combination wall/berm with a maximum wall height of 8 feet along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south; and • to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the location of the permanent access point and the reconfigured roadways, lakes and residential areas. Said changes are fully described in the San Marino PUD amendment and Site Plan attached as Exhibit"A", and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A—PUD Amendment and Site Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended, the San Marino PUD. CONDITIONS: 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. DISCLAIMER: Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners or the Board of Zoning Appeals, as appropriate. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. 20/4,0 [Ai C t r Date Mark Strain, Hearing Examiner Approv as to fo and legality: Scott A: Stone Assistant County Attorney [16-CPS-01522/1262649/1]69 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" to HEX No. 2016 — 22 San Marino PUD Amendment to Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended The below sections of the San Marino Planned Unit Development, attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Nos. 00-10 and 15-30, the San Marino PUD, are hereby amended as attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference: • Exhibit B, entitled "PARCEL B PUD MASTER PLAN" • Section V, entitled "DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS" • Section VI, entitled "DEVIATION FROM THE LDC" N is Co N *=D =DD= 2( 1)2 o_ = A Exhibit A —m3 mK - m >c0'— �=mz m? C— Cfnmf "m NJj, Page 1 of 4 O DCmOnni nr TrnC co m —I 73 ��cn 0 pD DOG) 000 �� mzo m wv zgm zo o� r �vT a, CA m0- 00 m;o xo0 ao- om cz m - - vmo0 - RID T2< mC) Ei S mm D n� -1nm -im -i m =D O ------ " --- ---------- m r m o OD m Z O m r - "--"'-'- -""" _ COLLIER BLVD/CR 951 Z A7 A p 0 0/-170, n Z m HENDERSON CREEK CANAL i m 41 m CDD 0_,, -<> Z m m 11)17:, 'i7{ r BUFFER N< < >< �m mmc z 1�� ////1I i F. J rim m �� 1 �m D / •/)� -Z.� <‘-' Z7• mm �z Cmn 'U / H y cOW r -IC/) mA 0� > 1 o Uzi zzm m �n wm xN m N > Aim m KZ -0 pc 0 r a 1 mgr 0m0 0 om AA Cm rn W 11 ' p D0 o v-0 73, m0r— 1 " " zo m vc �� m� It s �D 0 �� DD z \1� DZ q mz 33m �Z ' )))y♦ o z0 z 00 m ,/ �, S `4` a ..... `- ---�10'TV�E"A"BUFFER 1)2 r- /J �' -` %........„....0'.... -----�` ' O 1111111""1113""111 @l1 I O a " I11111111111111 a I A 1 0 C A 1 ilisill , p � O hiVim, z; H ,1 m tom >I A %,, 'ti .' A i' i6I p % !s= Am 1 z o,a P 1 Tim . mII om m D O 11- m - - 0 —I U1 X - - -1 DDZDDCOD - DDSi mmD mm mZ mm '1 r m 1 AC < < m G) X ` ,kX _X X NO BUFFER REQUIRED M O O o C { C 10'TYPE"A"OR"B"BUFFER X - C C C Z c z � L-I� C \ z O O m 3 \I o �7 miw o m m D of O woz N _ mzD r'' A O { C `2.r om FF F+ n 7, v m v CA NJ CO C n N m m Z O NJ O A m m A C m ccH HAH N c00 C C FFFF µ H < / D m _ A ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL:02/03/16 O :--:0-1-1 N PLAN REVISIONS WALDROP ti z 03/23/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS SAN MARINO 04/20/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS ENGINEERING a 05/10/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS CLIENT: H&LDVENTURE,L L�'. ® 05/19/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS Ll 1V 06/09/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS PARCEL"B"PUD MASTER PLAN «,aan�rrF`oa�uxn i .amA e�uoa .aart asaxra vnwae,ai auae 06/23/16 REVISED PER HEX EXHIBIT B Exhibit A Page 2 of 4 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * 5.3 PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD amendment approval dated June 29 2014, 2016, the Managing Entity is 44 8 LD Venture, LLC SD San Marino, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. * * * * * * * * * * * * * 5.g5 TRAFFIC A. The applicant shall install arterial level street lighting at the project entrances, prior to the granting of any Certificates of Occupancy for the project. B. The applicant shall provide, if required by Collier County Transportation Services, both a northbound right turn lane and a southbound left turn lane at the project entrances, which shall be constructed during the construction of the project's access driveways onto County Road 951. C. A potential vehicular interconnection to the agriculturally zoned property to the north may be provided if a mutual agreement is reached with the owners to address coordinated designed, and responsibility for permitting, construction and maintenance costs, and other applicable access considerations, including any bridge and turn land improvements. At the time of subdivision plat for the first phase of development, the developer must provide staff with documentation of their efforts to establish the Words underlined are added; works struck through are deleted. Exhibit A Page 3of4 interconnection in the form of a certified letter to the adjacent property owner. D. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 493 Two-way unadjusted PM Peak Hour trips. E. The Owner, its successor, or assign(s) agrees to provide proportionate fair share payment to Collier County for a traffic signal and appurtenances at any project entrance, when and if warranted. F. New driveway connections for the development of Parcel B must align with - • -- ° - - - - _ - see' - - - •- Northerly property line the access point shown on the PUD Master Plan for Parcel B. Words underlined are added; works struck through are deleted. Exhibit A Page 4of4 SECTION VI DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC * * * * * * * * * * * * * The following deviations are applicable to Parcel B only: 2. Deviation (2) from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2, Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks which are internal to the development to be constructed on both sides of local streets, to allow a 6'-wide sidewalk on one side of the street only for streets with homes on one side of the street, and _ _ _ _ _' _ _ _ _• _ _ _ ••.'• • • e.:. One canopy tree (or canopy tree equivalent) shall be provided per 30 linear feet of sidewalk. Canopy trees located within 10 feet of the sidewalk may count towards a sidewalk canopy tree. This deviation does not apply to the main entry road depicted on the PUD Master Plan for Parcel B. 4. Deviation (4) from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, which permits a maximum wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum wall height of 8 feet throughout the development, and a 12-foot tall masonry or concrete wall, berm, or combination wall/berm along Collier Blvd., and a 12-foot tall combination wall/berm with a maximum wall height of 8 feet along the southern boundary line where the RPUD abuts the Willow Run RPUD. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Words underlined are added; works struck through are deleted. AGENDA ITEM 4-A Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 23, 2016 SUBJECT: PETITION NO: PDI-PL20160000263 SAN MARINO PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner/Applicant: Agent: SD San Marino LLC Alexis Crespo, AICP 2647 Professional Circle, Suite 1201 Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Naples, FL 34110 28100 Bonita Grade Drive#305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 REQUESTED ACTION: SD San Marino, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended,the San Marino Planned Unit Development to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B, to amend a deviation to allow for a twelve (12)-foot tall fence, wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south,and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the location of the permanent access point, and the reconfigured roadways, lakes and residential areas. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject RPUD consists of 235±acres, located on the east side of Collier Boulevard,approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard,in Section 11, Township 50 South,Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 1 of 9 June 10,2016 / N L , igft RV' ig AQ.:1_,'—'7 --i- iii ,,,,'A 11 te 11,1 'Iq p NIP- 4 ___ ___ �..:��/t BANTA SAMARA IC. - A BARBARA _ 1 '''A BrABAx" �' L IdAEVARO - � i :!/✓SRR i ii ' ¢ p� J 11 A; , f1 ��! %.ARfATW V0. zp _ g `g S 8 __ _,7 u1 sm.:AT,— a i i9 �4 ~ a op Qs B g � � � j �fr�EI .c IT il7 > ,,,, ,,,, i _ - 15 11 alM CI E 11 w is —11 x �0 '� fl eg IA $y EA].sr�wxa.Y fir mZI C.R t 1 : ° ; 1la I' CQLLIER BWIEVAgp 77YY _ 1111-r---4 c■ ■]■] COWER BOULEVARD Z ---.§.--,..r-- l'� L Q S LLT ' C.R 95, 11 li, ie 11 iii Lri ii i11ti R > ,-\ i NE-I 1 w N it - g u O v 7D O j€ � m '9 A o IL u O ` Z I ✓ 7 NOT BCA r 0 x�� if "1 g 0 I �l •- '�.e,-� E4000CG�CCCCCC CCCCC�CC�CI s - • � ��044pdp0ECCCCCCC7"C.CC77CCCQCI BM ! D r 1 Il > mEu ! ■L d COWER BOULEVARD (CA.951) Z : CAMAI CARAT --_ — i v i CI N4 'o t -- - —____ — i 4. Z i l L RrdlT-Or--WAY M 5. Z I CK /■ 9 t J L 4/ 1 ' F^ 1= ,i7 {t _ ...._ \ _ Net 1 f — l; ;`''.;) , - -'‘: I ( S= L r SSS - Parcel B todil'AP , Baa 'E . t . - f „ ,'!, I „„ !Mde r1 ,ifJ i1 a " i. ill( 4arCr, Var t $ u ivir 'L ,5 cr c ,` Par el A \ -4,,,, .. Iq '. '' , .• x \ - , „„ .., impst - *f` Area Map(Source: Collier County GIS) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF MAP AND TEXT CHANGES: The application proposes to amend Ordinance 2000-10, as amended, San Marino Residential Planned Unit Development, by showing the location of the permanent access point, and changing the configuration of the lakes, roadways, and residential areas of Parcel B (as shown on the master plan). The proposed changes also includes modifying two (2) existing deviations (i.e., Deviation #2 and Deviation #4). Deviation #2, which essentially allows sidewalks on one (1) side of the street (in lieu of both sides of the street), proposes to clarify that this deviation would not be applicable to the RPUD's main entry road. The proposed change to Deviation #4 seeks to allow fences, as an allowable element within the composition of the wall and berm design proposed along Collier Boulevard as well as where the RPUD abuts the Willow Run RPUD. ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Planning: Staff does not support some of the changes proposed and does not encourage their approval; specifically, the wholesale loss of the well-planned internal street arrangement. Staff supports retaining the existing street design and discourages approval of this aspect of the redesign,but nonetheless, finds the subject petition consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) (see Attachment #1 - Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review). Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the CCME. The location and acreage of the proposed preserve will PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 3 of 9 June 10,2016 not be affected by the proposed amendment. A minimum of 57.71 acres of native vegetation are required to be retained for the PUD. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff reviewed the application and found this project consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. There is no increase in the number of residential dwelling units/traffic generation. The petition relocates the main access for the development. The access does not change the development GMP consistency;therefore there is no impact on the previous findings of approval. Additionally operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), and the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: This PUD was previously approved with eight (8) deviations pursuant to Ordinance 2015-30. Seven (7) of the eight (8) deviations are applicable to Parcel B only, and the petitioner is now seeking to modify two (2)of them. Deviation#2 (Sidewalks Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements) Deviation 2 from LDC Section 6. 06. 02.A.2 Sidewalks Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks which are internal to the development to be constructed on both sides of local streets, to allow a six (6)-foot wide sidewalk on one (1) side of the street only for streets with homes on one side of the street, ., . . . . . -_ - . : -- - . - . One (1) canopy tree (or canopy tree equivalent) shall be provided per thirty (30) linear feet of sidewalk. Canopy trees located within ten(10) feet of the sidewalk may count towards a sidewalk canopy tree. This deviation does not apply to the main entry road depicted on the PUD Master Plan for Parcel B. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner's justification for the change to this deviation is as follows: "The above modifications to Deviation #2 recognizes that the main entry road is being shifted south away from the northern property line via this PDI application. As such,there will be residential streets to the north and south of the main entry road, whereas the previous design only located residential streets to the south. Based upon the proposed location of the main entry roadway, it is appropriate to locate sidewalks on both sides of this roadway to facilitate pedestrian movement throughout the project. Therefore, the deviation language is modified to clarify that the deviation for sidewalks on one (1) side of roadways does not apply to the main entry road based on its new location." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The requested change would eliminate a component of a previously approved deviation and cause the design to be compliant with the minimum standards of the LDC. Based on the applicant's justification, staff recommends APPROVAL of this requested deviation. Deviation #4 (Fences and Walls) Deviation(4)from LDC Section 5.03.02.C,Fences and Walls,which permits a maximum fence or wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum fence, PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 4 of 9 June 10,2016 wall or berm h dight of 8 feet throughout the development,and a 12-foot tall fence,wall,or berm height, along Collier Blvd., and along the southern boundary line where the RPUD abuts the Willow Run RPUD. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner's justification for the change to this deviation is as follows: "The requested modification to this deviation will allow for the option to provide a wall, fence, berm, or fence/wall/berm combination along the shared boundary lines with the neighboring PUD to the south,Willow Run.This is in addition to the approved fence/wall/berm heights along Collier Boulevard and around the project perimeter. The proposed 12-foot fence/wall/berm combination will mitigate potential visual and noise impacts from the neighboring residential tracts within Willow Run. The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening between the proposed residential uses, while ensuring a quality design aesthetic via screening of the wall by required perimeter plantings. Willow Run is permitted for multifamily buildings up to 75 feet in height, while San Marino is strictly limited to single-family dwelling types at a maximum height of 35 feet. Therefore, the additional wall/fence/berm height will enhance compatibility, and assist in screening differing residential uses, building heights, and associated densities across these projects." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The petitioner's rational in the initial request for the deviation was as follows: "The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening and mitigation of noise pollution resulting from traffic along CR 951, a 6-lane divided arterial roadway. Approval of this deviation will serve to promote public health, safety and welfare, as well as enhance the aesthetic appeal of the proposed community and the Collier Boulevard corridor." The staff analysis and recommendation of the previous report did not specifically evaluate or draw a comparison or distinction between a wall, fence, or berm. Since this was not a critical component of the initial evaluation, it is staff's opinion that including a fence or berm as a design element within the development, or a fence as a design element along Collier Boulevard and the southern boundary line would have no detrimental effect of the subject property or surrounding properties. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE CRITERIA: There are three (3) types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: Substantial, Insubstantial, and Minor. An insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or minor change. An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC Section 10.02.13 E.1. The criteria and response to each criterion are listed below as follows: Section 10.02.13.E.1 a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, there is no proposed change to the boundary of the RUD. PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 5 of 9 June 10,2016 b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? There would be no increase to the total number of units, intensity of land uses, or height of buildings within the development. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation,conservation,recreation,or open space areas within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five(5) acres in area? The applicant responded to this criterion by stating,"No,the request will not result in a decrease of preserve,conservation,recreation,or open space areas." A note on the proposed master plan indicates that a minimum of 57.71 acres will be preserve area, which is consistent with the master plan approved in 2015 (pursuant to Ordinance 2015-30). With respect to open space, no data was provided on the master plan approved in connection with Ordinance 2015-30; however,the proposed master plan indicates that 60% open space would be provided, which is consisteht with the existing language indicated in Section 2.8 of the PUD Document. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? The subject project is an RPUD, so there is no land area previously approved for or dedicated to commercial or industrial land use. The petition generally seeks to amend a traffic commitment, amend the deviation relating to the wall/berm within the development along Collier Boulevard and proposed along the shared border with Willow Run, and to reconfigure internal roadways and lake management areas on Parcel B on the master plan. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not4imited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? The proposed amendment will not result in a land use that generates a higher number of vehicular trips than those provided for by the current PUD. There is no substantial impact to traffic circulation or other public facilities. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? The proposed amendment would not result in land use activities that generate higher levels of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, which were not anticipated when the principal uses were originally adopted. PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 6 of 9 June 10,2016 g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? The proposed change will not create a drainage problem as the applicant will be required to submit a SFWMD permit and all required stormwater documentation to County staff to be evaluated during the Development Review process. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? The proposed changes would not result in an incompatibility with adjacent land uses. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? Staff from Comprehensive Planning, Environmental Planning, and Transportation Planning have determined the petition would be consistent with the GMP. j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec. 380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)9e)2., F.S., and any changes to a DRUPUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Sec. 2.7.3.5.4 or Sec. 2.7.3.5.6 of this Code. The San Marino RPUD is not a Development or Regional Impact and therefore, this criterion is not applicable. k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.? No modification to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance that is deemed substantial under Section 10.02.13 is proposed at this time. Approval by the Hearing Examiner shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application and action should be taken at a regularly scheduled meeting. Section 10.02.f3.E.2 Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? No,the changes proposed do not change the original analysis,rezone findings,or PUD findings for the original application and staff report. PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 7 of 9 June 10,2016 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC)RECOMMENDATION: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and PUD document to address environmental concerns. This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): A NIM was conducted on May 18, 2016 at the South Collier Regional Library at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway. Ms. Crespo and the public were engaged in a discussion about lakes and their design, water management, and the buffer wall,which is the subject of Deviation#4. Ms. Crespo indicated that if a wall is part of the design, it would likely be comprised of masonry. Please see a copy of the summary of this meeting in Attachment#2—Application and Support Material. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on June 10, 2016. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD. Attachments: 1) Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review 2) Application and Support Material PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 8 of 9 June 10,2016 PREPARED BY: 4_VZ 0/A, ERIC L JOHNSON, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: //// RAYM D V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING'DIVISION MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 9 of 9 May 20,2016 ATTACHMENT #1 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review Ca 'e-r Cv my GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Eric Johnson,AICP, Principal Planner,Zoning Services Section From: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: May 10, 2016 Subject: Future Land Use Element(FLUE) Consistency Review of Proposed Amendments to the San Marina Residential Planned Unit Development(3rd memo) • PETITION NUMBER: PL-20160000263 - REV: 3 PETITION NAME: San Marino of Naples Tract B REQUEST: The application proposes to amend Ordinance 15-30, San Marino Residential Planned Unit Development,with several Insubstantial Changes as listed below: • Amend Traffic Commitment 5.5.F. in Section V, Development Commitments to comply with a new driveway connection, as shown on a revised PUD Master Plan. • Add Traffic Commitment 5.5.G. in Section V, Development Commitments, regarding relocation of the Henderson Creek canal and multi-use pathway, as requested by County staff. • Amend Deviation No.4 in Section VI,Deviations to allow construction of a taller wall-berm combination along the shared property line with Willow Run,as shown on a revised PUD Master Plan. • Amend PUD Master Plan to reflect the insubstantial changes enumerated above, and, to show changes to lakes and roadways, as summarized [below]: LOCATION: The subject property (San Marino Tract B) is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard (CR 84), 1.5 miles north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, north and east of the developed portion of San Marino, north and west of the Willow Run PUD and,south of Forest Glen Golf&Country Club PUD. Tract B is located in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The application for Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) is for the San Marino RPUD. The PDI requests are specific to a +196-acre parcel known as"San Marina Tract B"as addressed below: Development Commitments, subsection V.5.5.F: Modify language that involves a driveway connection; now identified by its geographic alignment with an existing CR 951 median opening, to be as depicted on the PUD Master Plan. Revising Traffic Commitment 5.5.F. relocates the "Main Entry Road" intersecting Collier Boulevard southward from the intersection location originally approved for this community. Relocating the "Main Entry Road" will allow for residences on both its sides, which the presently-approved alignment will not allow; and the San Marino PUD LDC Deviation (2) was originally approved based on this one-sided limitation. The new "Main Entry Road"alignment is not limited in this manner and will now permit construction of internal sidewalks on both sides. The original San Marino PUD LDC Deviation (2) is no longer requested and sidewalks will be constructed on both sides. n' Development Commitments, subsection V.5.5.G: Language requires the developer to relocate the pathway alongside the canal located along the front of the subject property upon its expansion,along with the appropriate [access &maintenance] easements. Deviation No.4:Allow construction of a taller wall-berm combination along a shared property line; now limited to a shorter height. Revising Deviation No.4 increases the height of the privacy structure separating this community from a neighboring community. Master Plan: Depict changes corresponding to the PUD materials above;introduce two lakes to the"front section" where previously absent, and more prominently, replace the internal system of connecting roadways with two multi-branched cul-de-sacs. Changing the PUD Master Plan introduces an entirely different internal street arrangement that no longer provides the traffic circulation and walkability provided in the design originally approved for this community. Staff has concerns that, while this part of the requested amendment does not move it out of the realm of an "insubstantial"change per the LDC,this change is a significant departure from the vehicular and pedestrian connectivity encouraged by the FLUE and from the original design approved. FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, surrounding land uses. Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services Section's staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. FLUE Objective 7 and relevant policies were evaluated for the original PUD rezone petition approved October 25, 2011. Given the nature of this petition,staff has determined a full re-analysis of these policies is not necessary. Based on the above analysis, staff does not support some of the changes proposed, as noted above, and does not encourage their approval: specifically, the wholesale loss of the well-planned internal street arrangement. Staff supports retaining the existing street design and discourages approval of this aspect of the redesign,but nonetheless,finds the subject petition consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi,A1CP, Director,Zoning Division David Weeks,AICP, Growth Management Manager,Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager,Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section G:Comp\Consistency Reviews\2016 G:ICDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews120161PD11PDl-PL2016-263 San Marino R3.docu ATTACHMENT #2 Application and Support Material SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 NIM SYNOPSIS EXHIBIT A SAN MARINO (PDI-PL2016-0263) Neighborhood Information Meeting Project Information Sheet Wednesday, May 18, 2016 Project Size: 235+/-acres Future Land Use: Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict - (No change proposed) Current Zoning: Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) - (No change proposed) Approved Density/Uses: 350 (existing) multi-family dwelling units within the Aventine at Naples Parcel "A"; and 300 single-family dwelling units on the 196+/- acre Parcel "B". *Proposed Insubstantial Changes to the PUD (PDI): • Amend Parcel B PUD Master Plan to relocate the driveway connection to Collier Blvd. and demonstrate reconfigured lake and residential development tracts internal to the project. • Amend Development Commitments regarding the new driveway connection location shown on Parcel B PUD Master Plan, and the relocation of multi-use pathway along the Henderson Creek Canal. • Amend Deviation #2 to locate sidewalks on both sides of the main entry roadway • Amend Deviation #4 in Section VI, Deviations from the LDC, to allow for the option to construct a 12-foot tall wall/berm combination along the shared boundary with the Willow Run RPUD, as shown on the revised Parcel B PUD Master Plan. *PLEASE NOTE: THIS PDI WILL ALLOW FOR STOCK DEVELOPMENT TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION OFA RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ON THE PROPERTY. THIS PDI WILL NOT ALLOW THE PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED WITH SPORTS FIELDS AS A PRINCIPAL USE OR SPRING TRAINING FACILITY. WALDROP ENGINEERING � CML ENGINEERING&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 28100 BONfA GRANDE DR.#305 / \ BON ITA SPRINGS,FL 34135 P:2339-405.7777 F:239.4054899 Memorandum To: Eric Johnson,AICP From: Alexis Crespo,AICP cc: Keith Gelder Date: May 18,2016 Subject: San Marino(PDI-PL20160000263) Neighborhood Information Meeting(NIM)Synopsis Waldrop Engineering, P.A., on behalf of Stock Development, and Collier County Staff conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on Wednesday, May 18, 2016. The meeting was held at 5:30 p.m. at the South Regional Library at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway. The sign-in sheet is attached as Exhibit"A",and demonstrates approximately six(6)residents were in attendance,not including the consultant team and Staff.Handouts were distributed outlining the project overview and changes requested through the Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) are attached as Exhibit"B". Alexis Crespo (Agent) conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team, and an overview of the PDI application.Ms.Crespo outlined the project location and existing PUD approvals. Ms. Crespo explained the insubstantial change to a PUD(PDI)application under review by Staff. Ms. Crespo discussed the handout provided to attendees and presented the approved PUD Master Plan and proposed PUD master plan in detail,as well as an aerial of the site,noting the location of preserve area in proximity to the Forest Glen community. Ms. Crespo discussed the relocated access point, reconfiguration of internal lakes and residential areas,and the requested deviations relating to locating sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road,and an optional 12-foot wall/berm combination against Willow Run to the south. Ms.Crespo also outlined the public input opportunities throughout the process,and noted the upcoming Hearing Examiner is scheduled for Thursday June 9, 2016, at 9 A.M. Ms. Crespo clarified that this hearing will not go before the Collier County Board of County Commissioners because the proposed changes are deemed unsubstantial. It was also stated that residents who received a notice of the NIM would also be receiving notice for that hearing. Page 1 of 2 Following the Consultant's presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the Agent questions regarding the proposed development. The following is a summarized list of the questions asked and responses given. Question/Comment 1: Will there be a left-out(regarding access point)? Response: There is not a left-out. Question/Comment 2: Were there lakes in the original plan and are there any in the new plan? Response:Yes,there are lakes in both plans. The old plan had a linear lake running north/south and 2 other lakes, and the new plan has a winding, connected lake system. Question/Comment 3: How does that affect water tables of communities north and south of the site? Response: It will not. They will have to get a permit from the South Florida Water Management District before they start building the lakes. Question/Comment 4: How deep will the lakes be? Response: I do not know,but we can find out that information for you. Question/Comment 5 and 6: Will they be elevating the land?By how much? Response: Yes,any property in Southwest Florida needs to have some dirt on it to elevate the land. It will abide by FEMA regulations as well as all federal, local, and state standards. Question/Comment 7: Is the wall a concrete wall on top of a berm that makes it 12 feet? Response: It would likely be on a berm and would be somewhat decorative and consistent with the communities on 951. Question/Comment 8: Did you say it would be a concrete wall?(Eric Johnson) Response: We have not specified the material but it would likely be masonry. It is optional; it is not required by the code. There were no further questions or comments.Ms.Crespo thanked attendees for coming and noted that her contact information, as well as Mr. Johnson's, are available for those who wished to contact either of them. One resident requested that the images on the displays be emailed to him. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:50 p.m. The meeting was recorded per the CD attached as Exhibit"C". Page 2 of 2 -__ -,2 Lf . ,..: U C a) to cn N<'' . . 4" v, 1::, •,,- 112 -,,i,\:::, Q.)c...Q in Ts — c E u < C3 -. Ns = — i., _ . ..0 0 . '---t. --•1 •,ks. '-' CU 0 .40 •"' O k.. 7-; E -. .. -.., ‘, C./‘ ,,es• . .0 0 2 di vi• E cu c ''' '3 '' ---K CU 0 .0 •- ,. c.,1 ....,,,I, ."....., c) CD IA 0, CU CU > 0 Z .s.... --s. Lu 2 6 43 al -a, ........, -',., cA V) % N i .11'33 1-5 :5 C1. A.,1 k 4 j I-1-1 ro mc 2 a (1) N L ' cf) \LI > \o - .. .... > ._ . c , 8 0 z- U) R._ ,...t Z E --.1 7, 4, o . = 8 a, -- --Z n ra .0 ......., Ir.. 0 < “5 ''' \4, F— 0 Cr) ILI - bz .c , ..c ....2 4::4m CNI • • .1 4. Ct Cl. © : ,y. >.,i5 ra .?.? 2-1 =lc c 03 —co 0 0 > c - . -s. 0- ):- e) 3 U)1 \"'/11,1:. ''''; 134..= 4.C..n3 4; .6°) W .......... c\I pu. --a m E ,:-. 0, cu (4 t_ a_ •-• c a) .c Ts * cy t rTha 0 co- u i : .6 > 2 . % 0 ,,, 0 < 1.---(1 v‘.... ---)...1,‘..„..„ (••9..I Z T.-. Cf) Ct. (24 LA M CU . C>1 < 4-, j:s 1:1 on 4-r 0. cf);.> ''"i '-->1 f) utJ Cu U. ,j0 0 2 Ili CU -0 0 0 u 0 CO Z 1 < .Y., .... ..... L. 4. >• c- gQ4 3r,0 ( ) Z 6.„.) -coNxuoi VII '''''' c9 sir LA >. C jj 2 ai 4E' 8 0 .72 -77- 6 N - ' .... -----i\-) 1-, ' \4. - ,-- --, ‹ --' O t - . z ,/ ,(' , c' --\--: < 2 ". 4-' (1) 0 CD .0 „C ,....3 .. ,- ..c — 1 c .c a' il ,..„ \...... ,b.0 — rTi w 1 i.71 _c a) .r...... 1.... (..) Z \\\ . . , ( AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE .--.. I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affl.davi Compliance $* (Signature of Applicant) State of Florida County of-€eH4er-L'44" The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 2"qday of _,2016 by /-e )S ( t p ,who is personally know to me or who has produced as identification. edG‘e coceZC 'U (S'gnature of Notary Public) 40-e_aglee A/L/C e 47 4 (Notary Seal) Printed Name of Notary aoo.'. .:Nt, CANDACE WOODWORTH * * MY COMMISSION 1 FF 115934 wr• EXPIRES:November 13,2018 %,,aF sc,, Bonded Thru Budget Notary Services G:\N1M Procedures/Affidavit Of Compliance-NIM Oct20l0.Doc A- WALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS of-Ot 6,a April 26,2016 RE: San Marino -Insubstantial Change to Planned Unit Development PDI-PL2016-0000263 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Alexis Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering, P.A. on behalf of Stock Development has filed an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI) application with Collier County in regards to the San Marino Residential Planned Unit Development. The subject property totals 235+/-acres and is located in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, east of Collier Blvd. (CR 951) and approximately 1.5 miles north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The property is immediately north of the Aventine at Naples apartment complex The application requests the following changes: To amend the Development Commitments regarding a) the Managing Entity; b) the relocation of the existing multi-use pathway along the Henderson Creek Canal; c)to comply with driveway connection location shown on the revised Parcel B PUD Master Plan; To amend the Deviations to allow for the option to construct a 12-foot tall wall/berm combination along the shared boundary with Willow Run; and to amend the Parcel B PUD Master Plan to reflect the reconfigured internal lakes and roadways. THIS PDI WILL ALLOW FOR STOCK DEVELOPMENT TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ON THE PROPERTY. THIS PDI WILL NOT ALLOW THE PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED WITH SPORTS FIELDS AS A PRINCIPAL USE OR SPRING TRAINING FACILITY. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements pertaining to an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday, May, 18th at 5:30 p.m. at the Collier County South Regional Library,Meeting Room B,8065 Lely Cultural Parkway,Naples,FL 34113. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 405-7777 ext. 207, or alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING,P.A. S ►iii Alexis V. Crespo,AICP Vice President of Planning *The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. moms+ 1"�F Zry Nn nn rvnNNN nryNN nN N nn NN N N nNN n F N N h 2 N N h N N N N VOf 2 V01 N V01 Vg1 2 io'1 2 V01 V01 io(1 N N N N 2 V01 N Vg1 i0(1 N N N Vg1 Vol N N N i0'1 N VO1 2 N N N N N V01 N V01 N N N GNNN „� NNnNNNNNNn „ ti nryNNryrvrvnNNrynNNryNNNrynNNNNNNNnrvNNNNryN z 2 7 F- oA m n m b b m 0 m n 'on o. .o.A m .o.a m A .o.m n n 'on N n ro'0i$ n n .o. v'on A A A r0'.o.ro'n.oi v not n A o.m r m m o.w N n p n e o v. o $4 Q o " g I n' i o f m 'N" o v d g N o 8 'm" 4 n m 0m I A `.7 oo e i i s I 0 0 ill N i ti o n I v'Oimn "g1 .7, , mmmo ovr0 i covmi mm8 I m o0^N 7 omo l .' i mA 080$ ; �8 " 8 S °° � n m O � N N I til O N = �N b �N d �n O N S�P N ry n � H a� 0 'p si .O. ISP ^qii x ° I : " o z I I v1 I r04 i 0, I $ .'". a o > I £aha I ml !n :3 a ti aNmu.s. oaa tim>;„oti ;2 tizsoz .. .s. o oz .�iq �� .s. � ° � z m W ° f � sz z O8 ° Z� ."' >n� nw c I mym >rsilmammmmm � em l!!: mgmWm_ 1OZ2Oneifiv7iailkal 7"` � Wgii a O �c d W � Q'' z LL z x ' z w 0��0 0 LL� LL� � >'� m g o f d� x z f 0 -' W o m,� Om � 3 � �Z LL � 2 w N a f z w J 5 w=r Q a g o W w f =j ¢a W 3 z s m a x�.,x z a rr j z a a a' ' a,t w LL m L^' a'a ' z a i 'a`a °'a 'a z W x'a `a`a m a W'a z = a a m a a o x a a R'a m zO z'a a Q z 2 a a a z G z m 3 z z z 3 g, s m o z z z a z G g c z z z f z s� � z m z m z u t�z �,z u s z v s s o z s f w z z z z =z o 0 z 5 z 0 22 Oa o� ' dao RDrz f z2 2o zg 3 v k 1 2 o 0 0 a G z m ' ry a o G o74 < zo '^ F`� J O s O m m 2 a c am m a z z N , LIm .o O � � f Pi z 11 c m o 3 "-S 1 4! >z a 3 a i z a' u m > z W,s m o c G z c z o o i„ msm Wa aW W g m ° z a a m a O O g " m a W o 1 a O . ° ¢ a G s a s G o N > d 5 0 0 � O' 9, -+ nF.,' m 5 O O N N i . m c 8 ' 8 g No N 2 O 1 4 > N N O z m z G m 3 V E. a 0 G " J z z i 3 m 3 a ! z o 3 3 $ > > > > G w ° o?° o m W z u W m w m o ¢ a j c ° :910 ;‹ ¢ r- z w g o G G ° ?u o c o 0 $a3 3 > mm >amzm0 �`u'zoo °owi W m ° m;W , 1 EE W8d3> m awma3� ai� , W 3> 5 ,1 °zoagz >° W cc J Eu° wma i� '"> `° Oaa " c > � zz mag °gad ir= �m � t7a �'-u a uz W me mmz°G ¢ 3i33 ?= Higi f2iO3REgPl =Xm� oo50, giWisoWoauu'�ACfigg "'m= ! N^ o >m g ° N z O a u m x o m o N , a ma u m S 17 k Q p 0p z , " �p Q�g Ha W N o Q mn O C m G � Y S Q 3 c z C7 N(•j O m m h 01 O O N G F-P w °~ .. �Y1 W O c a0 > m 2 m U N r.a. .r M E z .�1+I N J H m m 3 V=e'v z ..Q H m a m.�1. a i L m.n.m 8 m H 0 rg1'S n V m , n m O a J V LL z a 2 V w 22 W 2 m ? a 2 i Z W w H�2 E o a Jh" °� � awi ° NaiJ.11. Nxi ww z .iuzsw Ne ° uigZs 1 = a o,S =m Oo1acaZz = mo i < ug. 1oam m oOiiQ.4 ;Rgr!° r :Izaaz ° ,g ,LcW "ao9h!, ttL2t4Edgoo �� t11wwi !c,9A* 0zzozzao2 w ,12o6gw03,mWrwaGz0O1CmmaawLlmOmmOCCmmmm7mmmm85s868xuu0uLoc°° oog°og Y1 n $ e e u n f11 m o m N '$g m 5 $ $m N ry 2 n m m o N og o is oma 8 u R O o n m $M m °f ry u ro'"' N 00 umi M �'a vai m " �`� ry'� .o. o n� m ry o N m m m ,� n n m sago $ $ $ $ 8p?„§ ,48vi $$ oo $ '. $ $ $$ 00 0088um. $ $ 0088 $ $ 0 8 " '�$ $ 0 8$ 8$ o0 '�+on n nn $ $m mm n 10 eov m m no nm x N m m m m m m m m m 00 m S m S S m S O m m m m m 0 m m m m m m m m m O m m m m u n o n n n .+ n n n Nn nnn n nNn N N N N v N N N N N N N N N N N N a o N N N m N N N N N N N N N rsry rs'N N N N N N sn n rs' N r N N N N N N N N s N P,T:2'., H nn0000nnn000ggg000000000 00000 0000 000 nry nrvrvn nrvry nry nnnn rvnn n nnrvrvry nnn n nrvrvnnry 22s222222F, 22228222222222222 , , 2822222222222 222P, 2m „ ,no.. nrvrvnnnnnnrvrvnnnrvrvrvnnnnnrvnnnnnnnrvnnnrvnrvrvnrvrvnrvnnrvnnnnnnnrvnn oO: Uil, i. A ;ii:Voo Cs << � MsA �omsosa �rmUmo 'i .. omMi;MCU:0;MH5. 0 c a n a m c .. a e n < r .+ a m N0 m 0 1m M o NW jm o oOp 0o0 e n ngo I9 ooag ry2Z ry ^ ooe0ry4o4eomoomo foZ !„ ,, 1 !x : mltiao � aQi om • hm ' ?zmg ° om00'n0w " $ , moLL ;qw !ri' if .;miziga; mmo- gg1Wzs=:zEN LLZLL ¢ 4ozitzwwoIFaoa 0xw LLLLLL ad0 , "< z o a 0 a 'o zam zx .¢ ' ' aF w ` aaaoxNNzz . LL a a Z T O 00 0 Q ¢ 2 w x H z C N z O w 0 3 0 o m z V4 o m z m r o z z S z o s P,.' o - 0 a s Z = a = 3 3 o z z o G G _ ~ w o 0 o m } o °o ”' 'a > w P3 0 3 E m g o a u oo T m = ', a F x d o z i o z 0 R': a m a ` 0 > = z o m m V h m m m re, lag ,p n Q Q Q o ; m o ao" ry O O N _ o L a aO0 0 h = m = a ai'nz hpZ7 ,.. a > zG ao io maz ? = z, mT '¢ z w zzuaco ai >0 l0 oZiZa za } og z z w a , G �' w3 ° a Eo m ogoioz3zgo° Ncc _ m; 0ocaa ? Ooxm O ° m m ,w vmrv20mz w? z a ? " mmmrorn �m � na , 1mvnzm , m_„ . . . a 0 F z N ¢ x ¢ ¢ z z < 0 i z a 3 a z z, m a s c a Z a L g`' z a m a z w ° m 3 z T ~^ z E'2 ‹ u > z u W °� E ?, ! “ :19! _ l z ?a , g 3 w m a s h P a R 2 J F vWxi x i mom ,„ aow m 3 uN � 'z ¢ m '-o W oZ ag z0 z W w ma co6ai! "_' o 5 = zz aaamg3m q z r- oQuui ,ma ' ,a °� F ac wt mx oga mw oo ,a6w ~ x cxzxma60 wogg..'m" ia30 `" N = '-oa6us pao; tx Tco Oou oaa3Q zco _ 6 w o El g o !! f z m Q o o - a o Q z 3 >V a =8 u °o o m g g a g z o a = u oz x a E - z g - - z a w 3 2 '" d t15, m n z g o g . . g u o = g z m Y z z 'o x a F o =g z z N z = o 2' a ¢ a w ., G LI o o m c _ c a a a w�., W o „ a ¢ a o 0 0 = a a o o g x x x x D O w w w LL W W LL LL LL LL LL LL u LL LL LL LL t9 l7 � t9 C7 V' -V' V' V' 2 x 2 x 2 S S 2 S S a m o o ry ao ry e m ry n m ry.n $ Dov o r`"i o o e m 00 m o e o m o m n m m m m N n n ry n m p o 2 v 2 ti v 1 1 m a o n n .n o v, ,n m �n v, o ,'y $ n 2 a "' e ry ry �n o N < m < ry ry m m o 0 0 0 o o ,E+ o 0 o n o o ry o 0 0 0 0 , 0 00 ,moi o 0 - 0 00 0 0 `" o 0 0 0 0 o ti o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 .�, 0 0 00 0 m m o ry m m o m m m m m m m m m m m m o m m m m m m ro 0 m m m ao m o m m m g m rvm ao m m „ oo m m m w ro ry ry n n rai ry n ry ry ry n n n rni r�i n ry n ry rai n rev ry n ry n r rei ry ry ry ry n ry n r ry r n �`r-. ry n ry n rai ry n rai n rei e`ry n n eav n ry PP 41ry4N4,1,14,14 ,1 ,1444 ,1ry ry rvry N N4 ,14,1 ry4ry44,1,1444,1 ,14,14,144444,1 ry,1n,1 ,14N rye Na /•••. 22 .95;N 5; 2222 U51 'ii 222,N2 i22,92 N 22 h N,?, 2.25151,?, N'ih N N N N N C N'rte2 NG 22222 C .22 N N N N ry N N N N N ry N N N N N y ry N N N N N N N N N N N N ry N� m m .-1 ry N N N n N N N n N N N N N n N ry N mn gn'o-laomnnnm oo .o.n ,oi .oi .1 .. .. m groom .o. 'iiro..oigroi.o'nnroin4o o.o. m .°. .oiM �.... g n� m a nma e .. � n m v N e e § n n N 4 § T i IP N qq ? is o n n m m � N W Nan'1noiN F' 0 ., QX.N..r ov+m 'I" I . '771.5,' �S i .�e.m 12 i n .:1.,1-' '� '" I I o I mnoo .m. ��m�Q lom m q$ 000a � Qmu 40 0 � I onam {{ No$ori'o 0 3g i RE4§NN NlT2 a Illommnl� o ..INn� olnmg^gg'N^g ,NWO g 1 n I a N m Z 3 I I I I .. o I c� f m I a I 7 I o I a I d i m W N `SEN .. o_�x � Q .a.mo .�. °p0� .Q. zY $ f .�. ry .. o � mmonv � I a.Q.a .o.ml m� �<m �Qe Z e W a Z ?~m ¢ m m 2 m m ¢ m i^1 Q a O n S g i O F T Q lerl >m Q S 1=� � mo� � x> oxE fz � zxG m"' j ��mzz -emx ,1, ofo mzf 0 0 N(i x a a o< o w a i 2 0 Q a? p d LL Z a w o J a N N N 5 o N=1 J 3 LL°a a N W=o LL LL i 6 Q Y Q�� O�¢ 2 � � J 2 O i�Q?i 6 2 k Ji Q J gU' 2 C�j a C c��f Z a O� p � > -'�¢>a n H 2 d ��a LL o z m 1 0 'a a c a x _ z s`a w l z a o o 'a 'a ¢i a t m a `a o a a a a i I a'a 5 G 5 z ¢ � s z � z s 3 z w z¢z u s a o z S c�x m z u u z z u z r•m u z z m o z z LL z a �a z O Z O z 00 0 O Q r 6 O Z 2 ¢ Z O ¢ O O 0, O ° m 1 a w o a z Li n '..i m .on t 3 G G o 'i O O N O m > rc V m F a O I°, aOJG ° nis ~ mw 9 0o22 o m m ''i % g 1i3 ao mQNO m 0o .N N N J o a N - t v o :..8,f. ¢ Z C ° o rl O O Z 2 O 'W^ O n cZq a s o m = z 0 8 z - J c > a a ° g a ° ° ry c o ° 5 > f x ' nu ' 0 a Jwoc Gcrr °Oligo $°Nozza PJ °� .°, o0gtil ,M1 $>Rz � i ma '-zY = > coma,2§Moozp c 0 a ¢Z a G � x W¢ s t9 a'.' m z z S'—" Z O¢ '~il t7 w . w m om ° '' rc W u N w°3 � ¢ 8 a o `r O rn ^ zmGLL =,omo ° w !i c Np O Na OWa1 N° �f Nit, mzz Baa> °c� �+� _zW z > � 3N � Ox a pm O w g lc m ° x a m z N JO qa¢j 0 OF Z O¢O of j w ¢i C a l7 O z g i 0 a x° V ¢ v m <f h N m g V w H zxo p "' oom � a, � ¢° naLL ° > az � o N = uNLL3N� z oro° <p,xn'm9 mmmN O1mxa ¢u c o zm z_ rvm tx� o�al� ozm �5= m o3 ooe m¢ o m ry o m N n i 0 r N S vni m 3?r�oi m n.moi m ¢r m a i1 z~ m m 0 N 7 N z °u n m n$ m m g m„ m a.nr NN ..ry .. V n a a 'o. �`$¢�l7 nr rN.ry.,1.x � tea �ies .N+ 'm.' e3mc .+mmm � mz.. f Cx 17, ril > O s ,7.,t, a x g o o N Z Z Y c'c o a m z a o. w o ro a J w o ° ° 8° ¢ ° o W i m s ¢am Jz°zoz 5 s ° F Ww 1eg � ee ;;° LL w 0zra af. -W !f2c> ° ^mat zm J a W > � ° zaf FF x ,ti �v5 o `a„>, aw 7 1 W.3. o s W 3 O ,4%,°: LLm R El:OM uM aV7 Q u : <!-!:1 ao7tm c :5q ..4'01 o °3 o a z= W w 9 °W ?w N x a < z N z z ` o " E °�o w Z o aria �qzZ °� az zm k� aaaz W zwfNw gn; 3Fmg0ux s "r � u x o z a � J 3 z o J � s'"m o w f E a m p t t o i < = a mC °W z a t z � °m o o� u ¢ 3 foazsmz W�wa2';HZoSz xdo ,v8;01�3 wwaoto °oi 1L]Lutilw2c9c� 5 Y w Zai w `° z o°? o Q sIw l 6 Y o a r W w a L w w'zn i i t a x E i: z i 3 J u V' �. Q Q o N d� m ..+O 'giNp oa c7ux � V= �o: ¢xx -+ Oc�¢a W � JJ � J_ f¢ <WN � g y o 3 z z";a 3 0 o a a a a a a u g u u u 0 0 5 i- a `a'a 'a '¢ ' > 8 o O w t c l z z x i Y � �5 5 5 5�� E�f � � � 0 1 1 1 �1 1 o m g m e N .e. .m.I e Non a m m� 1$ N a a,1m � �rmv n o�,10 n n r r.mi m n m m n e m ry m ry a m r ,1 m .N. ..`� m v N mni°i o a ,1 ,1 e � a u'on .�. io o ro o o ry °1 m m m e n o o `dn m g e e m vel 88 �" `�o$ oogoo '".$ oo ITII0000$ �$ $oo $000 iiiiiio .`�. gg . illilil m m m $ $m^ m m�n m m$m �m n m ao o m m m ao m m m o m m m� o 0 0 � ro m m m m m m m S m ao g m^ m m o m m n l m M M n n n n ry n n rev r ry ry n rev rev rev rei r rev n rei ry ry ry ry r rev rei rei ry ry n n ry n n n n n,1 n n rei n n ry ry rei n rei rei rei a `* n n e ry rQi e n m 'c m y N n N DU m c n LLO e � n $ a n ry ry n ryry ry u ry ry m ry ry n n n e ry ry ry n ry ry m N ry e N e ry n n m r m ry m n ry ry R n n ry ry N m ry n e ry n n w R m 0N .Q EL' $ M $ 2 M M M n 2 M g g M 8 M $ 8 2 2 2 M M M 2 M 2 M H 2 2 2 h 2 2 2 r 2 m 2 2 2 m 2 2 n m m n m 2 M r 2 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n ry ry ry ry ry n n n n ry ry n n ry n n ry n n n n ry ry ry ry n ,^_� ry n ry ry ry ry n ry ry n n ry ry n n n ti ry n ry ry n n n n ry n n m o ry m n .o+v m om v e ry .o. m a m m y.o. rv � c ry m e � ry n ry.o.roi � n roi n o.o+m ryvn.o.n � ,o.m .o+ o m ry a El ^,' $w ozmPoo^.^n Hoo 0 o o 8 ! IT . M4l e $ e E ^' ' $$ on$ 4 014 $ $ ry i m,moo < onu0 $ m m $ $ ^ ; om ; rnoJmaeomzma8o ^ a .eeaaz. ^WaAm . 1mLL3 i ao "a aoma p � aZa " momKz Jmimw¢ $ o0a¢oQ 2L oO > ; 97 0 2 z15 r05 5 gLLnLLgw_05p5W5F° ° gpW _, lgW3 m0 zmzz ffQ iQ Z ixliDa ouoffu ko< <_ >o z 0 z z 0 o m z22 f z z o > 0 = oo m o 00 (1 6w E z z z r o z x - f 5 o 0 0 0 0 m 0 3 a m v, R z r o z z o 1 z z 5 w o z 3 0 E0 a m u o mw t, Fr: z m 5 0 k 5 m z z0 �s g ' aG � f 8 2 m w a V 0 m W 0 OU Z0 a Oza o o 00 3 ?3x w xoo z n d 3 o fl o ` a ar g u = z n , n Fe oj3uQ m z m z J m ,g gN O ~ s O r as 3 m e w o t r 3 Z m 8 z z z i w z s w ; z = 3 0 0 0 >> 3 0 0 0 � 3 > > �Y o 6 3 0 0 0 > Z o 0 0 0 c G a ° >5 3 G o o z z 3 .i m o S o a G J 2',2 t8 8o8fms W mmN a '" otz$ og 61"3 :! - R '012221,7, 3zma'0 ? o ^o+ z0 9 $ z w a m o p � 3 �� a m Q � � a m a � ° o a � � a � � o o °o m 3 = 3 ° a `w o LL 0 a ° 3 w " ° S o - o o N a o x W o 0 0 3 a o S w u a m z m G g LL > 0 m �LLox � ,� o amz z m Nw � w � n� 3 � ;, _ � awTiaz � ,} zT W m Nm �m� x 'N v ,^y° m m 5 5 ° r'- x o 0 o Z o o m i m tea, x a 3 m ° ° m w u x o " 'o m J > 0 3 0 W m - J 0 z m �o m m a � m $ a M m n � z O n a�a m x m °°O m a .�. n $ a ^ x a j m u Z m j a i o � t9 z � a w d m Z 1.mi.^r e m M M ry umi U M <; M M h ry lJ ry U M M m 2 U r�i m m M M m u o e O n •• a $ n m M m mO U o n r ra az .". s .rv.rvu .+ v .. o .. nam Fmcan t z f 1 " . z > g "r' z 5 w J >i - w Z a < 2 x W I 5T 8 - J = z a w z a ' m 'Ao x o 5g '-f, r a o o 5 a, Q “ z z o 0 : 0 W, 22.-1. E m .i2 2 z o P °1"-! " = m' ° g m z i z z 3 ) ¢ O N1 r Y o°L °a w � v~i O 2V w x J � M an� � .ri r � C o Q> m O m w K !;i yu3 m > �izztJW2 J ra2iva � zob wz z � z mu azoo a s Z w o x W W Z o 0 Z = o p g w w r o °z a = o° , w w ? W a _o ¢ Q 3 o ? z _ m w ° 3 o w z ° g x o ° F Q w a m g a r o d o a J z 3 ° z 3 r a LL < 'o w z i o o u x, , g 0 a x oz w r a m g a z e , 0 i t z z = a i Y c z 0 a z 5,— , t,, . . - . 2 ,, ,,c, w Z N o a z s 2,„, o5 < Z- a 3z zr� oz � � oozc°'o � 0 - 0m > >`� i'a^ � �a, amzrou+ cnw z w >~ �� oLL M i l e � � � l i m - -O Om °m °m 0 ! M g R a i R R R E � o o I � � N x � a a T i o o c m '�+ r r r 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 m rmi m m � °^° N o a a e e e o e o o m m ��o N r o 0 0 � o $ m a e m o riOi o rni o ry o m m � m o n o„ e I$ $ $ $ $ `i $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ o $ o " $ " a ., o n ^ $ n I o 00 $ a m n ' $ n o $ " �n m �n ., a o vrvi m m m m m ^ o0 o m m ao m n n m ^m m m m m m o m $ m $ ao ao m m m $ m $ m �c m $ m $m m ao m n n ry n ry n ry ry n ry rai n n rai n n n n ry rai r:n n ry rai n n e ry n n n n n rai n n n n n n n n an ry n n n n n n n n n n o � o o u 0 0 0 0 m n 0 0 0 0 o m m m o n i . 014 0 m � Z !V51 s 5 z i p O O 2 O O z a z Y a W p C 2 > u m a 3 m z 2133 O a=N3 F ry o a Q2 Z p > Y of � O a3 2 1 Y 0 o� � s oss" s n n n n e e a v Co�er CcaH.nty June 3,2016 Dear Property Owner: This is to advise you that because you may have interest in the proceedings or you own property located within 500 feet of the following described property that a public hearing will be held by the Hearing Examiner (HEX) of Collier County, Florida,at 9:00 A.M.,on June 23,2016,in Room 609/610 at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160000263—SD San Marino,LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended,the San Marino Planned Unit Development,to add a traffic development commitment relating to relocation of an existing multi-use pathway in Parcel B, to amend a traffic development commitment to reflect the correct access point location for Parcel B,to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B,to amend a deviation to allow for a 12-foot tall fence, wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south, and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the correct access point and reconfigured roadways,lakes and residential areas, for the property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard, in Section 11,Township 50 South,Range 26 East, Collier County,Florida,consisting of 235+acres. You are invited to appear and be heard at the public hearing. You may also submit your comments in writing. NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE HEX. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEX AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE HEX SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO ME, A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE HEX WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Collier County HEX will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. This petition and other pertinent information are kept on file and may be reviewed at the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division building located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, Florida 34104. Please contact me at(239)252- 2931 or ericjohnson(a�colliergov.net to set up an appointment if you wish to review the file. Sincerely, , 11 cwt Eric L. Johnson,AICP,CFM, LEED Green Associate Principal Planner fJi,7/ :4 1. ft 3 _I ` 0_ Sf la goorolito. n� I. CI 1 0. z S � r AVM-ao-lHo_1 a aA I z , a I 1s. '7 lilf_IIN is ` = aow < N » ..311 0 ,rNVOdi Z 1YNva�' I �� "��.. p (,.ss j-o) aaVA31noe a3moa i jar I I w Q ; ) � � O 7 C m rw svrssl aro CO �=E®Y®mGWC7CCppp �� r • 0_ �J JLC N :=3:crtmonsaii Atoluar w', Rin ma8 '1ab� y (.0 cs J — a 31V0S 01 10N / 7 1 il Z L ; L)- n n S7 n n m IJII (), K K li M 17 17 ..0 w W 7 Q cco n I = i a5- ? - J1 A iii ii ice. w iro , q: ,- rE:3-"Ull E W" Z 10611 0 7§§§ a .4;IlltM gg I "III w IP 1--E #C n l.g0111 I "0 m 0av31rae ammo° E Z � p ,913 119 1. s. 51i 3AYMLY6 lS3 HV 1 F S b m w pQaE. N0aeixiav I nY9go `L' g NU C.) 1..-. Or iMitl t I..... li ' vi Inays IT @ i� h Y ;R i N a NOuv wra i1 lin lg ' ii ilk ''': '''' Fp i r I eci 3 YNVEDlYfiIviNYS tlaYeaYS tl1NVS _�li _ .Alea VaveaYe V1N'S w W 6 'TM i t •- �` N n m �N 8< � -ja d101 N $3 N a„ J5 • N v y \'^ 1>n 1>n N \0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WWWWWWWWWWWWW .I M ulm , 0000000000000000000000000000000000002222222222222 N 2 w WW ,*n Z . . W Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 J z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° z i.\ 0 \a a a a a a a a a a s a a a a a a s a s a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ¢ a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z2222222222222 \Q 3 \0 3 3 3 N W z z w w w w z z z z z W W w W W W z z z z z z W W w w W w W z W W z z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Z 3 Z m Z W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o \ 'i N 'n 1A 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0' 0' 0' 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ¢ z a Z v 0 a a r r r r r r r r r N N N r r r r r N N N N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (..) .63 ,---4o , ,-. --.;:i... 0. u ti ff,. w w w w w w w w w w www w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w u u U u u u u < u u u u u ¢ J W W Z N ¢ K K K C K C C K K K K K K 2' K C K C K CC K C CC C CC K K CC C C K C K C K a' < < ¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a Q N p Z a J z z 0 O 3 3 3 Z 222222222222222222222222222222222222 W W w w w w W w W w w ti ti w II w o \ \ o o 4'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L' " " " " " �" ' � ' �� .. W O \W o ,. 0 NNNNrrrrrrrrr �3Z �3z _, ,WZN Nti\3 wwwwwwwww z W z u r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r m m m s z z z Z Z O Z O Z Z 1A O u, Z Z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0000000000000 ' ° ,70 '. ‘1. 0 ' 0 ,16 ,j. 000 ° 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ON \ N �.-1 °N ,. N N N N \0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 3 ..-1W 3 • 3 .:3 .:.. :. w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z z z z L 3 z z 1n z z z z 000000000000000000000000000000000000 < < < < < < < < < < < < < MWMW m m 0) 00112. 0) 000030 3 3 2 Z Z Z z z Z Z Z Z z z Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z Z z z Z -' 0000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000 < < < < < < < < < < Q < < N an N N ul N N N N N N N . 2222222222222222222222222222212222121- VSl H H N Vxl O ) ) H ) VSI N M M N M M N 1x/1 N N N 0 N 1x/1 N .x/1 Vxl N N N .x/1 N N N r r r r r r r r r r r r r J .,. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. el .. .. .. .. .. .Y m m CO m m m m m CO CO m m CO m CO m m m m CO m m m m 01:003 m 1:013303 m 01:0 m m m m m 031:0 m CO m m m CO m m a 0 > Y m 010Mppa N 0 0 01 On t0 . p o Qal) 1 0 C N cn 1.• O oO N O WM 0ct 0 0 m iN pp ^ • ow c4 • O 1'1 0O . OM rn caJ 90 ,4 . ocA N � a ONpO O O gunon O t0 m m O O . O aJ0pNO000000lO ,0 ' MVl11N tn . OnM00 N VV ^ VnulVVi tnaV0 N .. p N0000 ,. OOOO ' 00mMMNOMpMMM0a ' N i i i i i i i iiN, 1m 1 mO MOMM MOM MMOvilQWMryoNO N •• O i p i. N JQy a „ NmmOmO „ „ m „ m „ O „ aaaQ „ aaaa •c v-, i a0aaaamaaa , o aO aa . - 00 . . - . . . . ppp . nZ . . R .. . . . . .. .. > .-1 .- 00 . .. . . ,. .-1 . 2 .. 1- an N .-1 O N .iN O. . N0 . . . . . . . . . 0 . . 0 . > . . . > z n „ O ti N N ,-1 M aZ _ KYaa aMMMaMTMaOa10pn . 1nM � � � � aammmT LjY �• nt1n1 tvSn1Zngd M Q Z nM W Z ° - gGLLJ JJJJJJz JC7 0 JJ J LLYJ -� JOJJ = LL LLLL xJ JLL 7X J uLL WWLLWWuu1,_ W JiLL W LLWMZ u W LL LLW rWvl m w° J 0 wZ ° MM � 1. waM7 ~ Q ° QQw ° Q wO ,, 07Z ° wwwZ wwwwwwwltwOwwfjJJJ wwwZ0awwwwQwQw ,, ww W W w • asa aaaaaaaaraa aazaaYa3 0 Q Q Q aaaaa „ 1- „ „ 1- „ „ „ .. , 0 „ ,,, 20 < _1 _, 0 >a Z a z Z 7 z ¢ ¢ = 7 aO0a Q Qa > QQQaQQQQQQ _3QQ7700 aQQ0 ¢ ¢ u ¢ OOU) x ¢ ¢ QQ ¢ ¢ Q ¢ ¢ O ¢ ¢ u ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ W ¢ ¢ LLONQ mQ ZZZmzzZZZZZzZZZeemZzZz2zZzZZ > Z01nWuuzfzzzUZuz1nzZzZZ2mZ iZ3uaz in 0 3 in Z iu on a 7 Q 1'nn Z CO O z 0 z m 0 m 0 O Z a w w O z 0 an MO a 0 co �\ z a W N O O O N N r a a Z 0 A 3 3 3 0ce b 1- 0U G G 0 E > z La Z Y 0 7 030 0 O Z U) � ¢ g 0 o 'a 1- 0 0 o z f "on 0 a 0 3 3 w 3 3 3 e .0. ¢ 0 N ¢ = w 00 _ iu = 2 Z M x 1+3+ 3 M m an W o g 1n u, an 0 au O 1n O o 2 m u N m m m ¢ u m O 0 F Ol Vl r N 03 U) a M Z 2 0 U) r N co an Z N m m m .a-1 2 3 0 N m 7 MM M M n N O N �� OON N N O O 0 a `-I 1- 's N r r r # .. r N r rr `a1 O N N N N N 0000 N N N N Z a Z Z Z 3 N Z # Z Z N Z N w 0 < un 00 r # 01- 0 0 # 7 f H Z p # # 0 # # Vrj # Vrj # # # # # 0C K O Z 2 O N ¢ ,Ql z ¢ D z D s m z z z z 3 3 3 3 3 3 p 0 3 3 3 3 3 u 3 3 z 3 3 = z w r s s CJ # r r �""”' " wo GGNGG GG u ,� G zG GuG gG GO : Le:"-' Z 't ."-' ° < A 0c. > Z U) 0 0 o < (8 (8 < < 0 < 0 < < < < < )03Z00 (800--, Z0 0 0 0 < 0 0 W Z o 0 0 0 Q U) 0 0 W 0000 > 2 VI yYj > > z Y Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z 7 r O O m 0 0 0 0 ¢ o 0 0 0 000U) < 0 0 0 g > >- < c2 W m m m 00 > 005050000 , 0m , = 001- 00 0 0 0 o k z o z > 000 000 '-' 000 W 00 c W h cc > N 1./1 Z 1N/1 Z N 1N/1 N w w Z ° r 0. L J 0. d 1 d O d Q .;43 ,--. .r Q - d 0 d d d c 0 d L w d d a H w J O J z U >- _, 2E 0+ J N J O Z g 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 o O Q z U) S x ¢ x x = x x = i -' z i r 0 0 U) z a x S S a Z x X o 0 c x 00 Q _. . 1 z Q x o z wr x o O C C K K a' K CC C C W ¢ 3 z 0 z s o N 2 m n o n N n 0 n 0 n n n n O n M-a, > NI 1mn N d m m 2 m m 0 m Z CO m t-Im O g 0 < 0 O L00 � rm! >Q ce ro com0 comz e v m 3 y 0 = F O x 7O O Z m N Pi 1 U) U) NI N 3 NJ 3 U) U) NJ U) N U) 0 .U-1 .M. m m 3 m m N m 2'n' wO m 3.- N m .N. .M. � m 0 m m m m m w a . 0) 0_ 011... .-len. � UM031- men`4 am n G a N m m N a al a z 2 ‹ j > w s au u N w a g 3 ax w w w o I u a g 7 Z W w w > m ~ z a 1rnL ° � a w am "' z ( ws a z U 0 0 0 o a ? w w Q F w W 0 Q > m 0 a Y 0 Q > 2 o f z < W0 .4 .4' W r a I z z ,a -„ttz >z Zi - cc Juu, Uatm au W 0 w2 otfmr0 = a ? 0222 o u r W u u r u 1- _, .. .. .u ° J W Z K p - a ¢ o V Y J 0 Q) W w ZZ Q > 2 o w W Y W O Gf 4f U) aJFa JJ JJ .. . 0 ,,, c. . > < 0uaww3x °a °a zpF = 3w0wsYQ � Q = o � � 3zoeiS16?‘ mZ03c� °Ci JZ z00 < 00 .< 0 < 0000 ,:, 0 -' u0p Z s z aJ 0 a m m ¢ m Q W 70 -, w ¢ 2 0 w ,- = w N to J `6 Q u u 3 z Q a a O O• O a = Z a =• LLF sWaaca _ z - czsz z s Z Z 7FOsa0m11 ° zm z¢ O m 3 H 3 Z m = -.s > Z Z m urOmJ• z z z f g w > a a a z z 6 z w = z ° �' 3 a d-Lo w ti z a o a u;o 2 cc z a 0 a 0 a °6 - (8o ' a 2 3 3 ¢ w a z a a z a z a a a < O N z 0 an an g 6 m w U) x a z m 0 d W 0 - w w a y o w O• = as z m o• a d Y• Z 3 .a Z a ,• 0 0 =g W <>:: • 1• > �� asos > oD0000000a0o = 0J0w0izoa ~ aoJaF- JaN ° 0o• aQrQ3wc °s• auD0 <• aa0ceo ow ( ~ 0mOLLx Z z v, r Q uI 1n CO 1n CO 1n 1n ti vt c 1n CO r CO 0 m 3 m 1n CO Q z 0 an Y a an g m L K w x u J 0 c CO m 1n x 3 a c m O m 2 Z g Y a 0 u 0U0pp (8 (8 (8 (8 (8 (8 (8 (8 (8 (8 (8 (88 (8 (8 O N N 1M0 W O N (8 100 m O N a t0 00 (8g (8 (8 (8 (8 (8 (8 10 Ono O N R N (8 O N a(8 t0 tO N N 0 0 (8 O 0 N ,a. (8 N N N N N 0o O m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0a 0 0 O O 0 O N U) N .N. .N. .M. .MV .M. .Mi .Mi 1- .ai 1. 1 .moi .�. Vl N VI t0 0 t0 10 N 1 m N W W 001 00l (8 N N 01 (8 Vl t0 W .�. .~. N .~. .~. .~i .i .el ~. N .~. .i N .~. .i ti .i .. ~ p 8 .~i .~. 8 .~. .~. .i .~. .~. .. 0000000000000 . O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00000000 . . . . . . . .. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W nm nm W nW W nM W COOW W COOW W a a a a .0 v < v a a e a a a a a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N n n n n n n n n n n n n n K N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mmmmmm mmmmmm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mmmmmm m m m m 2222222222222222222 D 22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 0000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000 Z 0 O Z 0 0 0 0 0 O Z 0 0 O Z 0 0 O D 0 O Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Z O Z 0 0 O O O Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Z O Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O Z 2 z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z 2 Z Z 2 Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z 2 Z Z 2 Z Z z Z Z Z Z 2 Z z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z z 0000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000 U U V u U U V U U V U U U U V U U V u U V U U U U V u U U U VU U V U U U V V U U U U U U U U U U U U V u V U U U U V U u U U U U V a a a Q a a Q a a s Q a a a Q a a a Q a a Q a a a s Q Q a ¢ a s a Q Q a a a a a a a a a a a Q a a a a a Q a a a ¢ a a a a Q a a a a Z Z w w Z Z w Z z w w w Z w w w Z w w w Z w w w Z w w w w Z Z w W w w w W w w w w w w w J W w w w w w J w w w w w W w w w w w w w w W W W W W W W W W W w ti O U' (7 0 (7 U' U' 0 (7 U' U' 0 0 U' U' 0 U' U' U' (7 U' U' U' (7 (7 (7 (7 U' 0' (7 (7 0 0 ((9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (9 (7 0 0 (7 0 (9 JU' (7 0 0 l7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l7 0 (41 S 0 F' O N F' 0 N N F' 0 F' N 0 H F• 0 , 0 0 F 0 0 0 F 0 0 0 0 F• W N N N W N N N 0 N W 0 W VI N N 0 N W VVI VI ~ 0 W W W VI VI N N 0 0 1- 0▪ 00 N N W N W N N W N N N W N N VI W N W N N W W N W W W W W W w W N W W W N N W W W W W W W W W W W W W a. a. aw• CC a. a. m z IY C m 0 0 m K s z ac in ¢ m z z m 0 m 0 m 0 0 0 K m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL 0 0000000000000000000000000000000 O p t ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O ° O O o p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < < a a a a Q a a a Q a a a a a a a a Q a a a Q ¢ a a a a Q a a a a a a a a a a Q a a a ¢ a a Q a a a ¢ Q a a a ¢ a a a a a a a a a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 1- 1- in 1- I- 1- a 1- 1- I- I- I I- I- 1- I- I- I- I- a I- I- I a I- I- I- I- in I- I- I- 11- I- I- I- I- in I- in I- I- I- I- I- 1- I- I- I- I- I a I- I- I- I- I- I- I a I- I- I- I- r in z m in a m m m z s m m z m m ¢ m z ¢ z m z s o: s z m z s m z m s m ¢ m z m m o: o: m z ¢ m s ¢ ¢ m z 0 ¢ ¢ 0 m s ¢ z z m m 0 0 CO CO in m CO m in CO in in CO in m CO in in CO CO CO in in CO CO CO in CO in in in CO CO CO in CO CO CO in in CO in CO in CO CO CO COm CO CO in CO CO CO in in CO CO CO in CO in CO in in CO CO CO CO CO o m 0 o °0 0 Q O CO N AT N ry 0 co 1 O 0 so O 0 nW N o 5 i mmo ON amN N a M O o Oma' O m N W ;T20Oo N O V N 0O p O MO NMN ° ul 0 00nmMN 'Nmti OOtO ' 00 00O° pmti• N o000000OOaOIpNm o OOOnO UcNIV1 8o om ° 0 ° . N .4- NNW mNn00 OMno oI ' o0O .i m no1qoa 0Ma H N $ Vco m m N m aomro oi ^ .. ' ti0oNgm m ooom N Z m $ 0 om '^ o - o , Noa rNmo D .ycoJI . 1mrv . , F , a a p a aU .nto ZD zoaN a2aLLtiNN m amZ W mw00 tiM4 -J n 44aati 0 V oaOOMn ma ap• o ZYtiffppNN m U tiMN m yM W .iy .-1 o0 - a al H aln1-1 NN w . . n . J OZ 0 0n > }M Zao vOv ° C "' aNvaaZ a ZyOW2 $ > v2KaO vQ my 2Fajr_ p mM ti m yF- Q Xaw w MZpMZg z MN i M2 mNz mS MmFNw Go a - a6suq f51- yze Z Ym °La-Ice Z ° m N o zO 2 a - y luLLLLJl7J ? 2 - z X 4 J1-J WN2JLLiZ1iLLmodZa.. WmLL •JxLLLLoJLLJ _ ZY° LL0 JJ - m J 0 zo iNOO= OF = wLLwo o LLLL = 00VwaxLL O LLoaLLZZ0aZN wOOW3JOvwOWWJ-JZOwN Z viZZ OV ¢ Za 2m s = 00- w ° 0131101111 - ~ = 2 a 2 Oj zH H 3Q a 2 � FZwa z J 2NOZ ? S a < W pa W a acr w 0 Z 0 a a 0 EW K a a a a ' > wyXJaa w O0aaY2UGQaaa (7xFax3u = fag3aaa 5sago ¢ 0a0z , Na >> < Oa < awa < 3y3 atmo < < aoaz 3a .. 3 � 20oNZuUVzN22zmmu3mZaZZwmwuJZQSZZ2JU JLLZ2UFZZ � (9zzmzNz M J co o z z v>i O Z z m ~ M cc o O m F- a m M in N a N oan 0 O 0 0 w z 0 2 co n N n M 0 0 0 0 m m I- F• F F 5 Z 2 Z > > D . >"' cc C K Q 1- K LU 0 0 0 z U. 0 0 ¢ •00 < m>- m 9- V Z Q 0 J 3 ? Y 0 m G & 7 0 a J 0 = z w u w Q ? 0 0 m 0 1.7, N _, o 5 m ~ co 5 N N 0. 0 ¢ 2 0 0 a Q 0 O X . 0 G cc O m X ¢ �' 0 n O 8 O o o N W . O m a o O O m ¢ ppp H a 0 VNc M N Ill N n89 M .al 0 m .1-10 1 0 N M m CO m a m wm N D 0 N m 8Na oN mo . a 0 m 3 o 0 Q t x~ a ~ L2 - O oN 2 Z ZppZ0 z ZmiNNW uN > N W> F� J 0 tt 7 < 7 N DZ 7 ¢ 2 m > 0 z s a s F- s O >' m m z 0 z m s Q m ° o- 0 a a. 7, 000 a w 0 l7 W 0 O O K < 0 . ,:, .... o < �+J+ °N 0 0 ¢ Z > D .rt y z 0 = m Y J a k z m m m G a ~ O a 'a $ Z Q a 'a O s W o z 2 yQ Jaw 'a ° a w o ya a a' .7.- 3 m N J G a Y m O z < 0 . 0 0 > a V K 2 K 5 Q W m m n o W z O J ?) > in m in 0 0 F- m Q > a.Om o U 1i wm � ¢ ¢ aO m4mw000m mmy ,n (7 ¢ w 0O mx xLL ¢ z QZO -IQmv '* oJz 3 � Um _ an m >p . o 2 Y F w N m o m a Z Y -,- < m O o o m = _ a O 0 ° ° m 3 0 0a cc > 3 . 0 . f a ° m S o a = _, , a 5 0 5 ~^ z > a O z N w ¢ W w o W p X ¢ w5 , - W00 0 u p L,, -, -,jO m Z p J m m N p X z m J s m w x Q F• m O Z Z O u s m o a J z 2 3 5 m Y W 0 o O O 1- ( Z o o x 0 0 8 & a o o LL 2 o a u u o: p > w D o m r 1- z oO V 01 w y o M O m o .y 2 a = N N o Z m m pni Inc 5 m o Z m ~ O o m N a 2 0 -, 22 O m N O C T 2 m ° 0 = w O O Z < 6m >.i - 50 >Q 0 n a m n m m m N 01 F 01 p M O n ¢ N Of a W m n p ro m 0 2 L 0 m U m m m N 1- z m F• x o m 2 N O Ol 9 IO J O O pp Q 01 O 01 O .y a m N N 01 8 N l0 O 2 01 Of O 5 0 OI 01 O O p M O m Q m 2 pl 1- N t0 Q 00 01 a t0 O 01 p Q pp 2 ,-, Z ,c, N M N N W 01 Z 0 V M M a V H1 N o m m N G , ry N N n M M M M 3 N .i m . M M N u M N .-I M a N M Y N a M N lD H M M a J m K H N Z 0 a a J rr Z 11,1 Z 0 N w o Z ti m 0 a > LL w cc N ZZ < y ~ N Z _ Z V 6D w Z o W z Q Q = O a y Z 2 O Q 0 U w w l Z K 0 W Q m o 2 Q I- a' aZ w z_ Z g a ~_ F OO J H o s z w J aCL a sa . 0 Q 2 a Y w a aa' j 0 w > 2 aL m 2 2 2 Q N Q Z Q Y z w w O$f J Y L LLp W > F anw N 3 aS Q J w 7 Q Q w J a u Q o a otJ a{ ot1 Z m a ¢ a x otl z z o: u '^ zo al 03 a ¢ 3 1N„ O w g z oa 0 - F- ob o 5 m o p o z oL z x ¢ o x z Q ¢ 071 �? w a ¢ x f- J Z> 3 W z x i m z m Z l7 Q LL ¢ a 2 Q oL Z Z w Z< o . < 02 m O m Z W p tal 0 Y-. -.. 0. 0 3 0 LL w ww . - = < 2u Z J _, O O a x N O m 2 Q d ° w Z O U Z N w a 1- K F a O Q < m 0 Q Q Z O O m I+, a w z m . < 2x ,7 ¢ u u H F W Y W Q l7 Q - 2 2 -. < 0z Q Q Q Q z o 2 . . .10 _,,,e ul S - N y 2 ) Q m F. a m 2 C 0 Y w S J p O m •a S Q a W K w W x Q Q a 0 ° a J Q Z a' 0 = 2 .m W O O a o a ,,, 0 3 U Y ° 0 V 0 0 U 3 = z 0 vi p Z V W 2 z S o U' x o Y Z in = 1'J z x J U ¢ O vw~i a 2 0 20 0 071 2 Z w ~ Z , >Z W w vl J ¢ K m J ¢ L" o • Q OZ J B o N o o° x w a z a g a (' o N o Z VUI O Z a Z Q 7 Z O Z a Z Z Z 11m 2 2 m O - J ° 2 ui a n� W 0 w w N w Q Z W - N a a Z a w J W 3 w Z W m w 2 = U wQ O Za s a (2i a � a LL a a D x w 2 D o w - a w Q a a o _IQ o a a w ° 0 0 a z w G 0 > Z Q Q a a °o J U L L o o w N ° 0 J w. o O . z z J i Q a , 0 p 0 u m u s . Y N m a K Z U 0 s m Z Cr G cc G COp U 3 c L a U Y4p m 1pi Z a LL u 0_ 0. 020 > Z tp D 0 Ia 0p y x U 3 W K K X U a m t0 O to 0 W N n n n N W CO 000 000 W COOONi pal Om1 001 0 0 0 0 CO al al N al .y CO. N m m Cr MI CO O v V 0 CO 0 al 11 0 m wNm NM� COm COm m m m m m CO' m m m M m m m m CO(' m N N N N N N N N N N N p Np N N N N N N N N M M M M M CO CO m CO CO CO M M CO M p Mp CO CO m M1 pp 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n m CO CO m CO CO CO m CO m CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO m CO m CO CO CO m CO CO CO CO CO CO CO m m CO CO CO m CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO m CO CO CO m ^ CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO m m n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n N N N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m m mon m m m m m m 00 m m m 00 m m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m m m m mon m m m m 0 0 0 0 m m m m m 2222222 22 222 22 222 2 22 222 222 2 2 22 2 22 22 22 2 2222 2 22 2 22 22 222 22 22 22 22 222 22 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Z ZZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ Z ZZ ZZ Z ZZZ ZZ Z ZZ Z ZZ ZZ Z ZZ ZZ ZZ Z ZZ ZZ ZZZ Z ZZZZ Z Z Z ZZZZ ZZ ZZZZ Z ZZZ 22222222 22 22222 2 222 22 222 2 2222 22 2 22 22 222 22 22 2 22222 22 2 2222 22 2222 2 22 2 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 00 0 00 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 z z z z Z Z 2 Z z z z Z z Z z z z z Z z z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u U V U V U u u V O U V U u V u V U U u V U V U u V u V u u u u V U u V U u u u 0 u V V u u u u 0 u V u V u V u u V u V u u 0 u U 0 a a Q Q Q Q a ¢ a a a a Q a a a a a a a a Q a Q a a a a a ¢ a a a Q a a a a a a a a a Q Q a a a a Q a a a a a a a a Q a a a a Q a Q W W W w w w w z ZZ W w w w z W w W w ZZ W w w z ZZ w w z z W w w w w Z ZZ w W w W w z W z W W w ZZ z w ZZ w W z ZZZZ z ZZ W W W W W W W W w w W W W W W W w w W w w 00 00 0000 (90 00000 0 000 00 0 00 0 0000 000 00 (900 00 000 00 00000000000000000000 /� F- F F- F• F- F• F- F- F- N F- F F• F- F- F- F- F• F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F F- F- F- F I- F- F- F- F- H I- F F- F• F- F- F- F- F- F• F- F• F- F- F- F- F• F- F F- F• F- F- I- N F- F- F- l- c, u, W W W W M W W W M VI VI W W W W W W M M VI W W VI M VI VI W W N N W N N W W W N . M VI W W N LO M M W M VI M W N . M W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W lal a C a C a C C C C C a C C C C a a C C C C a C C C C C a CCC C a CCC C C C a C a C C C C C C a C C C a C a C a C a C C a C a a C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a a a Q a a a a a a < aaaa < a a ¢ a a < a a ¢ a a s Q a a a a a s a a a ¢ a a < a Q a a a a Q < a a a a a Q a a a a a Q < a a < z z z z z z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z z 2 Z z z z z Z Z Z z z Z Z z z Z Z z z Z Z Z Z Z z z Z Z z z z Z z Z Z z z Z Z 2 Z Z z Z z Z Z z z z z 2 Z Z Z Z Z z Z 2 Z Z z z Z Z 2 z z z z z z Z z z Z Z Z z z Z z z Z Z z Z Z Z z Z Z z Z z Z Z 2 Z Z Z z Z z z z Z z z Z z Z a a a Q a Q a a a a a Q Q a a a a Q Q a a s Q Q a ¢ ¢ a a a a a a a a Q a Q a a a a Q a a a a ¢ ¢ a Q a a a ¢ a a a Q Q a a a Q Q a F- F• F- F- F- F- F- F. F- F• F- F• F- L- F- H H R H F- F- F- F• F- F- F F- F• 1- F- F- F- F- F• F• F- F- F- I- F- F- V- F• I- F- F- F- L- F- F- F• F- F- F F F- L- F F- F- F- F- F- F• I- F- C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m o O .-I o N m O O O M N O O m O N N 0 0 In ,n n 0 0 c{ o n o o m O O In n O 1n 0 O p , Q 0 of O O O .I N V O D O N u1 O Cr CO Q 00 0l ,j O m V M O O m 0 I� M M T A. M Ont O p O op,p m O , , O m O 1 n an c00 O N M N , O m 0 a, ne Ln M , m . sr ooi m pt m r m v1 o O p I m ttoo m .m- OO m V pO tb m .mI ,0 m .ai oo .1, t0O o' N I� h m 0 m ry m O ,an O M O 'V.I a n M W N p , Vi O N O N O0 m o ^ of O tb O O n •N'I 0 m M M e O' N n m 0 1101 ..-1 ri N ' , O V' tD .my 00 O 0 M , n N N V M -' ',1" ,,,O8 N . ,4. N N a N a I N m . M n m m , O o m Q coel 0 es.Ni z 1, 1 Ot N Z N V 1 eni W Z a Z a O ¢ Z V O J J tD m J Q m d V .Vy O V O O N ut a J p V n m W > O r-- N m 0 .y m t,_ w 0 .i Ii d .-I > ry1 Ot n N W d ti W LL ut Y Z 00 N J of 0 Z JO 0 M V O m o 2 O a O V .y N O , O .L a Z ti vZl O lD 0 0 0 .a-i 3 vZi Y O N ry Of _ LL tO m J_ O J ° 7-1 N ry1 m M N m ¢ O Y Z m MZ Z d Q V Oa'1 tMr1 xp Z l7 C ° > Y Y M F' Y Q O V 0 C m > W M Y V > O V > d a 7 V vl N a C Z Q 2 J M J Q 7 Q Z x ° Z V N Z a Z > C V O C M C Z V J M O M Z Z 3 Q X Q Y 274 Q m a Z M M 0 F d 2 w > >0 J g g d V J .g 2 m o g Z 0 o J z _ N 3 z o z o o J x g u > J °C J J g ~ x a a `� 00 ' a p Y z C > < Z LL O 0 0 W j O ¢ d --/ Z o ° (')Q Z >- 0 3 J a o z 00 ° ,~n z ¢ ¢ Ow `i a _ w O Q Ii m I� > _ O W d cjd W O ¢ 0 J 'i'i z a O O O g v1 s w IJ 0 0 0 H 0 Q J w ° D 0 gw of i 01.- c,z 50 . < --, Q Z a 7 a W S 0 N m t^, 0 0 0 l07 0 . 0 3 J N O Z Z 0 Z 0 n L- 0 v' w O O z 0 1- 2 C a Q Q Q z k Q Z d > O, Q Q a-3 , u, w O W O U Z C w 6 , 0 = 0z 0 O 3 d 2 m O u Z Z w OJ . 0 w g O g Z d Z w y a a Q Z 7 Z z 2 o O a a w a a a W o W a x O Q 7 N 2 0 Q 2 w a ¢ a C S 0 a 0 a W k a Q a G , < < . < o z (� F- 2zzf 2f > aCuzog2vlC2u m2F- Cu0o . 2awuF- zzu2auuuw3zx2 momocozmomzzoc., 2 < y2 x Z O O an anQ O co O d m 3 co w a 0 0 u 0 a 1O 3 0 0 0 0 ° 0 ° N N N au0 C Z Q -Z a cc a a Q Y I- g w Cf N ice. 0o -1 z mrn M co o In 0 m 5 > z r_ < 1- u a 7 0 d Z w a Z ° o C Q M 7 a d U w > ON 0 1ce-- ZO p ¢ j >- 0 a w 0 a w z 3 , a Z z Q Z m Q ¢ w C an Q ✓, a u x m z Z Fc Z LL w > ° Q K 0 U m U 0 U O J ° o a.VI N > w ° ° z 2 ° L.3 o a z a o O w x 2 n da. ,ail 0 Y m > Z Z 1 V F- J CC g 3 m 0 a J ¢ Z 0 > Z N Y Z j 7 V W OJ ; Q u ¢ A > c0 O t~i1 m V > O w C g N m z o_ O (7 o m m 0 0 ti O •a o N a C O m a 7 N pp M CO 01 d > 0 V M C _ f N N v1 N N N a v1 to O O O O V 0 .-I N M L- ¢ M F- F F- LO Lu Q Z C V F- Z CoN Z Z O DO 7 V C A anco , 7 7 C it Z o a = > W m EN C30 0 0 , 3 z (°� W o 0 1- 2o Go z az >a cc vla (aiGOozo oo � wo G' o w ° > a f a � uga > a °• aH v, >- CC 7o W w m 3 Jb -, w = 50 $ o03rn wola+ - s n� oaacaz > N JGZmm i ° o ao o W > owzooao , ? w ° OY °Cz V w z t_^ sm j W L_,-,, 0ut °0awc,° I- 0F2 (6 � t = ¢ ? >¢ > tZpWZ-c ,nv~i ITCL) 2 O W N 6- pg _wmc,, an W r33 w = wxz '^ z F- � ON -, zz02 ° MI¢++ a s ,nFz '^ w � gaJN � aQawaQ � mZLL -. � a "a' a � 32aLL '" � `" � Zc2.rLL � � awu°, u' 'a'FIa„ u>, wQ Z O F- w o W 7 Q '-u (.0to n z a ° � 2 g > U. g o a g d � a � (� � O m ¢ n g � 3 0 � � z 3 ^ 3 w 0 0 � a o a � s ay pp 07 o m m Z m r > a w OU m a 'n w m U z o Q w o 1- au Z Q 3 -1 o Q 0 0 .a1 Imn, m m 0 3 1 2 0 Ion F h z O ,1a O m 0 1a_- O Z d k > y g x pCC mt O n o O w n1 w , 0) N CO W 0 .4 h Z n .mi N F-cc N m m . -, "0 a, - t8O m O Z U 2 0 0 0 0 N O o too M m O j O Q O N j ,mn O O Z 8al ,u ce a N 01 m M U U M C CO OC V A U' .J N N .-I 2 N n Q V M N V V -, J N M R N Z N Nen N (Oct o1 V V M 0 V M N V Q V coN V 2 N m _, w a Q Q Z a co au 0 Q a z a Z G Za N 2 >- C Q W Q W 0 ~ W 0 C Q Z H d ail F- m ¢ w C Q o a N N g W ~ ¢ a w Q Q ¢ Z Y W F- Z w a Q a o 0 a d w Z 0 0L O N m C Z j D N a71 > 0 ZrZ J z d J LL 0iJ ¢ V¢ 0b z 03 m Q Lu • 0 .t .- Y a z o 071 W W C Z Z 0b < C > -• ca ¢ = 0t w w W aL m w Y a co < a 0 u 071 OU a 0 , a m ail v, 0 u z N Z a aL W w w z °C 0 ? O .6 O Z o. a aN'J H W m Z 3 ,z ¢ 5 O O a 0 w 3 3 o C ut o _ ¢ O O 2 J aiJ a Z d ° a ' ,,,, < . w Z ut F ut >_ ¢ Z F W O>c 0 Z 3 °-` z '�^ a vi ° a z u, ¢ //0 d Q Z a a F- Y 2 °w Z H Y 03 ut CO y Q °a Q l7 o m 0 z Q Z w w O w Z Z a ¢ w Z a w d Y ¢ p o a 3 C oQ a o 2,i.°0‹ a ? 0 (� o z a o g Y s w = d z z z o z a x a o z CO a Y z o m z N Y F z 0 z oO F w 2 a 3 d V u o Z rii o O w o a =U z a SO j z 7 > w Z v~i a Z c ., p w C ceaou a m• 2 3 cc an <a _, m i_ o a 7 z 0 .CSZ a z 2 Y >`< ,.. < m LL,U Z S O H ° V LL Z S Z F J W x w Z Q U' O a t++ ° 3 ,n Z Z a s a j vl Z C Y V 2 2 ° Y a w l C Q W Y O V 0 0 7 W 7 ^� > 3 a o cc z o w Q N o a Q N o Q o z0 .- 4 w o w z(� o z W z z W LLcc $ d g a a g • LL o a u a v o �a a r g o ° m u° 7 Q Q J O C a 0 7 Q W cc O V > a v1 a c 3 x d p xp Y a 0 > Y fpp 3 3 0 g m (7 d z C > S Y m m m S 0 0p (7 V V z 5. 0 N CO K m d• Y 2 3 J U kj 22 0 2 N V tM0 CO N CO m m N V tO W pO N X t0 COi O N N tt0 CO n00 N m tN0 W O N V ttOO m al W CO N V tm0 W O N X b 03 0 N m n W m a W W Q N a O�i Omi O CO O p W O N V a v a V 4 4 3 a', v01 v01 2 N ul vl VI ut LT- EA M vl 01 of S11 01 IMP. N Ian val Ian tan vat IMn N o2t 2 INn Imn 2 2 o, o1 Inn of o1 Y1 01 8 2 aa2 In N 2 of 002 of N 2 2 t0 2 t0 t0 iO opo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0r. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0hN0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ono 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 CO CO CO CO m n N n n n W n n W COO m n n n N n N , O N n n n COO CO CO CO 0nn0 CO N m m CO CO , CO CO CO CO CO 00 CO CO CO CO CO 0000 ACCO CO CCCO CO ACCO CCCO ACCO CO 0nn0 CO 000 ACCO CCCO 00 N N N N N N N N N N 'Cr N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LLI Z Z O 0 x x a a LO m 7 V U • Y 1' m F F Z Z 7 7 O O ✓ V O 3LL LL O 0 0 0 Q Q F F z z x▪ x V, LU LU a 0- < Q Z z Z m 0 0 n n n n aN N M A U- VI. W a a Q• Q Z Z • >- < 3 3 m m 7 ULUU O V Q Q F F zLU z M o 0 0 IA LA 00 CO ✓ 0 Z Z_ CO CO 7 7 O 0 z ac F F z z O 0 O O U c3071 LL O 0 O 0 w •L: F F sLLI ¢ I x w w a a Q Q Z Z O N CO O N n O O O O O O 00 00 1D lD SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 SIGN POST AFFIDAVIT SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8,COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s)must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15)calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s)must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code,Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails,staples,or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post,or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place,and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable,the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY,PERSONALLY APPEARED Alexis Crespo WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLL '• .OUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PL.01600 ke.263 al 4 IP SI 'iiiF T `!CANT OR AGENT 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. #305 STREET OR P.O.BOX Alexis Crespo Bonita Springs, FL 34135 NAME(TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY,STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this a Y day of di)no , 20 IV by 1°11txi S GrrA 100 , personally known to me or whoroduced p as identification and who did/did not take an oath. .......,"''•. JACLYN MICHELLE MITCHELL � MY COMMISSION 8 FF 988491 S gnature o f Notary�� EXPIRES:May 3,2020 %;;dr i,?p' Bonded Thni Notary Public Underwriters I Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev.3/4/2015 SAN MARINO PDI PL20160000263 REVISED HEX SIGN POST PHOTOS , - , J a r a , PUBLIC HEARING FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE , • TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ''' - PETITION #: POI-PL20160000263 SAN MARINO RPUD TO OE HEARD BY THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER (HEX) SD SAN MARINO,LLC REQUESTS AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO ORDINANCE NO 2440•10.AS NAVAHO.THE SAN MARINO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,TO ADO A TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENT RELATING TO TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS FOR PARCEL S.TO AMEND A TRAFFIC OEYELDPMENT COMIAITMENT TO REFLECT THE CORRECT PERMANENT ACCESS POINT LOCATION ERR PARCEL 8, TD AMEND.,A OEYIATION TO REDUIRE:SIDEWALKS 00 BOTH SIDES Of TRE WHEN ENTRY ROAD OF PARCEL/.TO AMEND A DEVIATION TO ALLOW FDA A ID-FOOT TALL FENCE,WALE OR BERM ALONG THE SOARED BOUNDARY WITH WILLOW RUN PUD TO THE SOUTH,AND TO :AMEND THE MASTER PLAN FOR PARCEL R TO REFLECT THE LOCATION OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT ACCESS POINTS.AND THE U CONFIGURED ROADWAYS;LAKES AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS.FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEYARO, £ APPRNGF MATELY 19 PULES SOUTH OF DAVIS BOULEVARD,IN SECTION II,TOENHSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 25 EAST.COLLIER COUNTY FEOA.CONSISTING OF 235,,-ACRES CONTACT;ERIC JOHNSON-4,CP,CFO PRINCI AL P,ANiER FENNEL*, DATE JUNE 23rd 2016 ' 900A PHONE,1239252•2931 E?CJCIINSCN 'CQLLIERRGOV NET LOCATION. COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT afO_WTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, HEARING EXAMINER MEETING ROOM 6091610, 2800 NORTH NOR"SHOE DRIVE, NAPLES.- FL 34104 r. ‘ • : PSC RING FOR A UBS ' AGE 77 , �� I . .U 11 k Zxt. loo. D.Y a4''S,... A ... m.x.A.4V*4414**W#14.'"0,17:4'''.,.12.0,. #-" ,- ' , 4.--'4---- -.---'filti,-' `1: '.‘. '-4 , r -, ` 7 T -i, f'I 4- s t A. •, SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 COVER LETTER WALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING& LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 28100 BONRA GRANGE OR.1305 BONITA SPRING&,FL 3415 P:239405-7777 :• - F•239.405-7889;. February 4, 2016 REVISED June 9, 2016 Mr. Eric Johnson, AICP Zoning & Land Development Review Department Community Development & Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: San Marino RPUD Insubstantial Change (PDI-PL2016-263) Dear Mr.Johnson: Enclosed for your review is an application for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD in regards to the San Marino RPUD, a 235+/- acre project located east of CR 951/Collier Boulevard and 1.5 miles north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. The PDI request is specific to the 196+/- acre portion of the PUD, known as Parcel B. BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS The Property was originally rezoned in 2000 from Rural Agriculture ("A") and Rural Agriculture with Special Treatment Overlay ("A-ST") to PUD, allowing for the development of the property with a maximum of 352 dwelling units, a golf course, and preserves. In 2002, approximately 39 acres of the PUD were developed with 350 multi-family dwelling units known as the "Aventine at Naples" apartment complex, effectively utilizing all of the available base density for the entire PUD. The intent at that time for the remaining 196 acres was for development as a private golf course and club. In February 2014, Stock Development & H & LD Venture, LLC filed a Growth Management Plan Amendment to allow: 1) density bonus of up to 2.5 units per gross acre via the transfer of up to 2.5 units (transferable development rights) per acre from lands designated as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands; and 2) to allow the use of TDRS from any lands designated as Sending within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, thereby omitting the requirement to obtain TDRs from lands within one (1) mile of the Urban Boundary. In 2015, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2015-30, the Applicant amended the RPUD zoning to allow for the development of the 196+/-acres with a maximum of 300 residential dwelling units, preserve lands, and San Marino RPUD—PDI Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 1 of 6 amenities in accordance with the Growth Management Plan application. Since the date of approval the property was sold from H & LD Venture, LLC to Stock Development(SD San Marino, LIC). REQU EST The Applicant is requesting Staff's approval of an insubstantial change to the San Marino RPUD to allow for the following modifications to the RPUD, Ordinance 2015-30: • Amend PUD Monitoring Commitment 5.3 in Section V, Development Commitments, regarding the Managing Entity and date of amendment approval; • Amend Traffic Commitments in Section V, Development Commitments, regarding the realigned access point as shown on the revised Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan; • Amend Deviation #4 in Section VI, Deviations from the LDC, to allow for the option to construct a 12-foot tall wall/berm combination along the shared boundary with Willow Run as shown on the revised Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan; • Amend Deviation #2 to locate sidewalks on both sides of the main entry roadway; and • Amend Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan to reflect the changes requested through this PDI application, and demonstrate the reconfigured lake and roadway configurations. The modified commitments and deviation will allow for the protection of public health, safety and welfare while supporting the Applicant's intent to develop a single-family residential community in accordance with the PPL construction plans(PL2015-1759). As discussed during the meeting with Staff on January 4th, existing Transportation Commitment 5.5.F. erroneously describes the access to Parcel B from Collier Boulevard. The distance provided for in the commitment does not align with any median opening, either existing or proposed, and furthermore does not align with the Applicant's proposed access point shown on the aforementioned PPL plans. The revised commitment will allow access to the property in a location that is acceptable to the Applicant and Collier County Transportation Staff. As outlined in the enclosed deviation narrative, the shared combination berm/wall/fence along the southern property line abutting the Willow Run PUD will further enhance the compatibility between the two neighboring PUDs, and will assist in screening adjacent developments, as intended by the LDC. The San Marino PUD contains an approved deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, to allow a maximum wall height of eight (8) feet throughout the development, and a 12-foot tall wall, berm or combination fence/wall/berm along Collier Boulevard. Approval of the modified deviation will allow the Applicant the option to construct a 12-foot tall fence, wall, berm, or fence/wall/berm combination along the shared property line with the Willow Run PUD depending upon the uses that are developed in the tracts adjacent to San Marino. San Marino is limited to single-family dwelling types at a maximum height of 35 feet, while Willow Run is permitted multi-family buildings up to 75 feet in height. Due to the differing scale of dwelling types within each community, the proposed deviation will enhance the project from a compatibility standpoint. Please also refer to the enclosed Deviation Narrative that further details the appropriateness of the requested deviation. San Marino—PDI Cover Letter Page 2 of 6 JUSTIFICATION/COMPLIANCE WITH LDC§10.02.13.E: The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E as follows: a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No, the request will not impact the existing PUD boundary. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; No, the request will not increase the approved density or intensity, or the height of proposed buildings. c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No, the request will not result in a decrease of preserve, conservation, recreation, or open space areas. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No, the requests do not impact non-residential use areas. The San Marino PUD includes only residential uses. e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; No, the request will result in a decrease to the external impacts of the development. The Applicant is maintaining one (1)point of ingress/egress from Collier Boulevard, as currently approved in the PUD. The Applicant is simply modifying the description of the access point's location in the Developer Commitments section to support the proposed ingress/egress shown on PPL construction plans, and approved by Collier County Transportation Planning Staff. Therefore, the relocation of the access point will not have any external impacts. San Marino—PDI Cover Letter Page 3of6 f. A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No, the request will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. No change in land use activities is being requested. g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; No, the request will not result in increased requirements for storm water retention or increase storm water discharges. h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; The request will serve to enhance the Type "A"landscape buffer between the subject property and the abutting PUD to the south, Willow Run. The request for additional fence/wall/berm height will further screen the differing residential uses, while fully meeting the intent of the LDC to provide perimeter buffering between developments. i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; No, the request does not impact the project's compliance with the Growth Management Plan. The request is limited to modifying a traffic commitment and modifying one deviation. The PUD Master Plan changes are also consistent with the GMP. The request is consistent with GMPA Ordinance 15-29, which amended the Future Land Use Element specific to this subject property to allow for an increase to the maximum allowable residential density that may be achieved in Parcel B of the San Marino RPUD. The policy strictly limits achievement of this density through the use of TDRs. The proposed modifications per this PDI do not impact the project's density or the requirement to obtain the density via TDRs. The project continues to comply with all relevant GMP policies including but not limited to FLUE Policy 5.4 relating to compatibility; FLUE Policy 7.4 relating to walkability; and Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.1.1 regarding retention of required native preservation Therefore, the RPUD will continue to comply with the Growth Management Plan upon approval of the minor modifications proposed via this PD1. San Marino—PDI Cover Letter Page 4 of 6 j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or No, the request does not require a determination that the change will result in a substantial deviation. As noted above, the request will not increase density/intensity, traffic generation, non-residential land uses, or decrease environmental areas. The request does not meet any of the criterion outlined in F.S. 380.06(19)(e)2. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13 No, based upon meetings with Staff on January 4th the request is not a substantial modification to the PUD, and may be processed as a PDI pursuant to the LDC and Administrative Code. CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed Insubstantial Change will allow modifications specific to the San Marino PUD to support the Applicant's single-family residential development program, as proposed on the pending PPL construction plans. The proposed modifications will allow for enhanced design flexibility, and a PUD document that is current with the existing conditions. This application will not negatively impact public health, safety or welfare, and the PUD will remain consistent with the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP). The following items are enclosed for your review: 1. A check in the amount of$2,025 for the application fees; 2. Sixteen (16) copies of the completed PDI Application; 3. One (1) copy of e-mail from Ray Bellows waiving the pre-application meeting requirement; 4. Sixteen (16) copies of the Cover Letter/Project Narrative detailing the purpose of the request; 5. Sixteen (16) copies of the Current Master Plan & 1 reduced copy(8%2" x 11"); 6. Sixteen (16) copies of the Revised Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan (24"x36" & 11"x17"); 7. Sixteen (16) copies of the Revised Section V, Developer Commitments, of the PUD document in strikethrough/underline format; 8. Sixteen (16) copies of the Revised Section VI, Schedule of Deviations, of the PUD document in strikethrough/underline format; 9. Sixteen (16) copies of the Requested Deviations and Justifications; 10. Sixteen (16) copies of the Southern Buffer Cross Sections; 11. Sixteen (16) copies of the Certified Letter; 12. Two (2) copies of PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance#; San Marino—PDI Cover Letter Page 5of6 13. Two (2) copies of the Recorded Warranty Deed; 14. Two (2) copies of the Legal Description; 15. One (1) original and one (1) copy of the executed Affidavit of Authorization with list of parties in organization; 16. One (1) copies of the approved Addressing Checklist; 17. One (1) copies of the Location Map (8.5"X11"); and 18. Three (3) copies of the entire submittal documents on CDROM. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239)405-7777 or alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. I Alexis V. Crespo, AICP, LEED AP Vice President of Planning Enclosures cc: Keith Gelder, Stock Development San Marino—PDI Cover Letter Page 6 of 6 SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 APPLICATION Coltier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PD1) LDC subsection 10.02.13 E&Code of Laws section 2-83—2-90 Ch.3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): SD San Marino LLC c/o Keith Gelder Address: 2647 Professional Circle Suite 1201 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34110 Telephone: 239-449-5227 Cell: 239-280-6504 Fax: 239-592-7541 E-Mail Address: kgelder@stockdevelopment.com Name of Agent: Alexis Crespo, AICP Folio#:See Page 2 of Application. Section: 11 Twp: 50 Range: 26 Firm: Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Address: 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. 305 City: Bonita Springs State: FL ZIP: 34135 Telephone: 239405-7777 Cell: 239-850-8525 Fax: 239405-7899 E-Mail Address: alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com 6/17/2015 Page 1 of 5 Co el' County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? 0 Yes n No ❑ 1. If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name the beneficiaries below. ❑ 2. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders below. ❑ 3. If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate and name principals below. El 4. If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if any. ❑ 5. If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. ❑ 6. If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address below: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. PROPERTY INFORMATION PUD NAME: San Marino PUD ORDINANCE NUMBER: 2015-30 FOLIO NUMBER(S): 00411440000;00410960002;00411640004;00410840009;00410640005;00411320007;00410880001;00411240006;00411200004 Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? • Yes ❑ No 6/17/2015 Page 2 of 5 f Co, ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If no, please explain: Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? n Yes ❑ No If yes, in whose name? Stock Development Has any portion of the PUD been n SOLD and/or❑ DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? n Yes ❑ No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. Please see attached cover narrative/cover letter. 6/17/2015 Page 3 of 5 Go tier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal,the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW c REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 16 0 0 Pre-Application Meeting notes 1 0 0 - Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 16 0CI Detail of request 16 0 0 Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy CI0 0 Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy ,6 a 0 Revised Text and any exhibits CI0 0 PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined E6 Q 0 PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance# LIEl 0 Warranty Deed 0 0 0 Legal Description 0 a 0 Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended 0 0 0 If PUD is platted, include plat book pages 0 0 a List identifying Owner&all parties of corporation 2 n 0 Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 2 0 n Completed Addressing Checklist 1 0 0 Copy of 81/2 in. x 11 in.graphic location map of site 1 0 0 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise:The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials 3❑ x0 0 to be submitted electronically in PDF format. *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/17/2015 Page 4 of 5 ColiTe.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239) 252-6358 PLANNERS—INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District(Residential Components):Amy ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Lockheart Executive Director ❑ Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen ❑ Parks and Recreation:Vicky Ahmad ❑ Emergency Management:Dan Summers ❑ Naples Airport Authority:Ted Soliday ❑ Conservancy of SWFL:Nichole Ryan ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples:Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00 Pre-Application Meeting:$500.00 I Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 2/4/2016 Applicant/Owner Si:nature Date Alexis Crespo Applicant/Owner Name (please print) 6/17/2015 Page 5 of 5 SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 EMAIL FROM RAY BELLOWS WAIVING PRE-APPLICATION REQUIREMENT Lindsay Rodriguez From: BellowsRay <RayBellows©colliergov.net> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 2:04 PM To: Alexis Crespo Cc: StrainMark;AshtonHeidi; GundlachNancy; Lindsay Rodriguez Subject: RE: San Marino PDI - Pre-Application Meeting Waiver Hi Alexis, I agree,the pre-application meeting can be waived in this case. Please let me know if I can be of any other assistance. Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division-Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department—Planning& Regulation Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Co ter County From:Alexis Crespo [mailto:Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com] Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 11:47 AM To: BellowsRay Cc:StrainMark;AshtonHeidi; GundlachNancy; Lindsay Rodriguez Subject:San Marino PDI- Pre-Application Meeting Waiver Hi Ray, We are finalizing the PDI application to amend the following transportation commitment that was discussed during our meeting on January 4th "Commitment 5.5.F. New driveway connections for the development of Parcel B must align with the existing directional median opening, approximately 800'+south of the Northerly property line." Can you provide an email waiving the pre-application meeting requirement based upon our informal meeting with Staff? Thanks! Alexis V. Crespo,AICP, LEED AP Vice President of Planning WA .DROP C ;EN�7��NE:ENGINEERING _WLE4kFtfl;.krt GtAk4 N: t?•. 5,; ,6,t, i`F.f n:^.F Direct: E: alexisc@waldropengineering.com C:(239)850-8525 Office:P:(239)405-7777 l F:(239)405-7899 1 www.waldropengjneering.com NOTICE:Upon receipt of any electronic file/data from Waldrop Engineering,P.A.,you are agreeing to the following:This file/data is for informational purposes only.It is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the actual project site conditions.Recipient agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Waldrop Engineering,P.A.for any defects or errors in this file/data. Un F rd L- a 5:5 :ire cu. , 1 f _"of D"/. Rae; oo 55' _^5 5 55 b.,h _ na 2 SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 CURRENT MASTER PLAN (ORD. NO . 1 . , EXHIBIT B • 1 I : PARCEL B PUD MASTER PLAN ) - 1 C Q lAi Xt' 5g 11 1 a :18gi skgriR RE1 gl Ag 51 §-, ggig igv.215- 11! A !! „ig II ii§;a PE2qpi 11§ 1 It ifE g gerA q g* i A g., 81 _ _._........_ COLLIER BLVD/CR 961 1 JI;! Pi;! ..- i2A 19 ko g 0 11 r- > 4oxi 6 ILA A>.41tg aP 5 qz im , . i i 2 1 g 1 1) Cr3 r P la ren.........01 -4' a ----- rte-:w' 0 i) j/ .....- am.. 0/0.••••• •••••••• : C > 1 E 1_ ,, c. (1, () >. < < ) I Q 5 g M lir L: 0 I .aril b • ,.....!:. - cs , ' 1 P-;" Or' To.L.J hg ...; i . 1M 4 A i • • kit, . _.. , ;1; 0 1 I la 8 2 .4 a c c 4.0 I 4 ca ........ 1 .....\ L• - : -PI E 1 4 '... i z .3 i A 1 ... 1 e , ..., A , o 1 ‘:, 1, -4 ilFnigiFilA .4t),P \ 1 ' • Pgirn, g PPm 9 s•-•,... .__„1„..-. .-.... ' -0 A A A 0 c ..3 5 M i.5 .. EA1 ' 1 1 1_gilgm '1 —S ! fl 1 114 ... t. gF ki '41 3 g 2 g ''_.... i 040:04AL tRIEWITAL C4VI3/4 -I I i PLAN LEVISTIIR %WM REVVED PER COU147Y OCIMENTS SAN MARNO 0111 WALDROP -I 1'AYH REVISED PER ONARYC0601412/4113 01.011e15 REVISED PEA COUNTY CCIAIENT3 ENGINEERING - CLIENT:II&LD VENTUItE,L.L.C. I amens .Review PER COUNTY COMMIERT3 04‘1M 0,15 RIED KR CCX;NTY COMEXIB ?ARCM"Er MD MASTS%PLAN EXHIBIT B ,...... ,..........‹.".........=7::: 1,10.0,1111VMMILIMI.M.O MIS ir...01 YAM EXHIBIT C PUDA-PL-2014-0100 -Strike through text is deleted San Marino RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised: April 17, 2015 Page 30 of 33 i (•-;--,' SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 0 REVISED EXHIBIT B ( PARCEL B PUD MASTER PLAN ) 9' A W fV gx0 2D 11S 20> m1 �^ c rg -im3 mK m Dmr 01 m 1mZ �Z C- ASD Otn �Hn c 4 ., Oyu p� mz oox cid HIN y y : 2 Tic c D x'Im DD zm o ii z �' a wmM z� o1D 1Z 6;; i 2i ° 3 R ^g3 =1xw o Or DOG) py 0 = - 0 :y mZ9 -n co-0 Zmm zo °2 $ A mA0 -. CA m0- 00 ° Z m m° "°h m00 m OO—m cz m 3 30 Ay m o p)m1 D m-D'{ inn mm E z 2i E0 mA� 0 -I =>13 p-I P 81 <-1OO -IM -1_ DC GLi - O � mD mD m0EE-0 FalarirWRIaMr mO* DnZm1mm OA - 4-14.- HENDERSON CREEK CANAL mOD n1 {Z mmyR1 m T{ =m D r 20.TYPE !//'� D{ m(/1 m1 BUFFER r xm 1M 3A z 1 E 00, m Om t-< m 01 I 1-* `a Z mm �D m1. C m >m OD ZZp N t a _Z zZm m —1c) Corrn my > fll I $ " C�x mo CS o� m� r 6 11/1, ' °p> OHO O Om mx Am m W II g ) aB rlO -01 mX m1I-' m 1 EEEa a m i m ZO 10 SSm [c r� m1 > ' III [ zS2D " m f/7- xi c r `� z ,...-.` • td TYPE"A'BUFFER I z cg 111 c< a 1111111141Wilt/ s i a I A00111111111iii 1 a mmma '` • ji 1OV Q ----� --% 1 1 T g a * 222(2((`(((r(((j ((((��)(s I O 22 F. p A 2 D D C O y D D 2 ➢ lji a if ' , P C O p Z m n m O $$� ° m y Oar \ 1 �1..- 1 H a fD D A V 9 A m . D opt D,1 a 1 1,� a ` --� i C O O m 4 4 i ; 2 S f 1 m Fl O A O3 EI 100117 54 RI Li O 2ai • a 1 44, i r II a gx r— 1 moY L aI m R 'a a m O O T A m w of m C C i / S m fmn ; 2 C s \ a 1^ a .. y p F s / v \ O n 9 11 10 TYPE'A'OR.13.BUFFER NO BUFFER REQUIRED D S 2 2 3 O m m o o n �' ? z ^msA a c� n o - o o c o' y ? D p a a m D m NI ° C < F. 0 0 z n z�<A IP 9 m m y m 9 9 F. 0 A w W w w w W C A;m i HI m ' Pn ; > P O m — \Tjm A p� i .M / co'z r D C) m m ,3 D. G) _m W w 4 W• i'' 0.' w W m° m - " ';•' o - ° ° co m m Z o $ u a l m 0 m o, P xxx ,� ata^ 5 ; 8 - z m m �m -I m a$t �� D -I as a r q 'A ym a X K K K K K mm0 / -ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL:02/03/16 os PLAN REVISIONS y _Ai 03/23/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS SAN MARINO WALDROP ® 04/20/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS 77 ® 05/10/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS ENGINEERING A, 05/19/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS CLIENT:H&LD VENTURE,L.L.C. - ® 06/09/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS PARCEL"B"PUD MASTER PLAN i wee EXHIBIT B SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 REVISED TEXT (SECTION V) SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * 5.3 PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD amendment approval dated 20x-4, 2016, the Managing Entity is 14 & LD Venture, LLC SD San Marino, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. * * * * * * * * * * * * * 5.85 TRAFFIC A. The applicant shall install arterial level street lighting at the project entrances, prior to the granting of any Certificates of Occupancy for the project. B. The applicant shall provide, if required by Collier County Transportation Services, both a northbound right turn lane and a southbound left turn lane at the project entrances, which shall be constructed during the construction of the project's access driveways onto County Road 951. C. A potential vehicular interconnection to the agriculturally zoned property to the north may be provided if a mutual agreement is reached with the owners to address coordinated designed, and responsibility for permitting, construction and maintenance costs, and other applicable access considerations, including any bridge and turn land improvements. At the time of subdivision plat for the first phase of development, the developer must provide staff with documentation of their efforts to establish the Words underlined are added; works struck through are deleted. interconnection in the form of a certified letter to the adjacent property owner. D. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 493 Two-way unadjusted PM Peak Hour trips. E. The Owner, its successor, or assign(s) agrees to provide proportionate fair share payment to Collier County for a traffic signal and appurtenances at any project entrance, when and if warranted. F. New driveway connections for the development of Parcel B must align with existing directional median opening, approximately 800'+ south of the the access point shown on the PUD Master Plan for Parcel B. Words underlined are added; works etruck through are deleted. SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 REVISED TEXT (SECTION VI ) SECTION VI DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC * * * * * * * * * * * * * The following deviations are applicable to Parcel B only: 2. Deviation (2)from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2, Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks which are internal to the development to be constructed on both sides of local streets, to allow a 6'-wide sidewalk on one side of the street only for streets with homes on one side of the street—d - : - =' '-- . e- -• - '-- - -- •-..- -- - --. One canopy tree (or canopy tree equivalent) shall be provided per 30linear feet of sidewalk. Canopy trees located within 10 feet of the sidewalk may count towards a sidewalk canopy tree. This deviation does not apply to the main entry road depicted on the PUD Master Plan for Parcel B. 4. Deviation (4) from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, which permits a maximum fence or wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum fence, wall or berm height of 8 feet throughout the development, and a 12-foot tall fence, wall, or berm height, GF along Collier Blvd., and along the southern boundary line where the RPUD abuts the Willow Run RPUD. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Words underlined are added;works struck through are deleted. SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 DEVIATION & JUSTIFICATION NARRATIVE II A WALDROP CIVIL ENGINEERING& LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSING 28100 BONITA MINK I .1305 BOMTTA SPRINGS,Fl.`34135 "1P 238.408.7777 Ft 238.405-7888 JUSTIFICATIONS FOR REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC SAN MARINO RPUD REVISED MAY 2016 Deviation (1) from LDC Section 2.03.07D.4.g, which requires TDR credits to be redeemed at a rate proportional to percentage of the PUD approved gross density that is derived through TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits, to allow for use of the PUD's base density prior to the redemption of TDR credits. The following deviations are applicable to Parcel "B" only. Deviation No. 2: Deviation #2 from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2,Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks which are internal to the development to be constructed on both sides of local streets, to allow a 6'-wide sidewalk on one side of the street only for streets with homes on one side of the street-4 - - - - •- •- - - - - •- - •- - .'• -• ---.One canopy tree(or canopy tree equivalent)shall be provided per 30 linear feet of sidewalk. Canopy trees located within 10 feet of the sidewalk may count towards a sidewalk canopy tree. This deviation does not apply to the main entry road depicted on the PUD Master Plan for Parcel B. Justification:The above modifications to Deviation#2 recognizes that the main entry road is being shifted south away from the northern property line via this PDI application. As such,there will be residential streets to the north and south of the main entry road,whereas the previous design only located residential streets to the south. Based upon the proposed location of the main entry roadway,it is appropriate to locate sidewalks on both sides of this roadway to facilitate pedestrian movement throughout the project.Therefore, the deviation language is modified to clarify that the deviation for sidewalks on one (1) side of roadways does not apply to the main entry road based on its new location. Deviation No. 3: Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, Street System Requirements and Appendix B,Typical Street Sections and Right-Of-Way Design Standards,which establishes a 60-foot wide local road to allow a minimum 40-foot wide local road. Deviation No. 4: Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, which permits a maximum fence or wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum fence, wall or berm height of 8 feet throughout the development, and a 12-foot tall fence,wall,or berm height, or combination wall/berm along Collier Blvd., and along the southern boundary line where the RPUD abuts the Willow Run RPUD. Justification:The requested modification to this deviation will allow for the option to provide a wall, fence, berm, or fence/wall/berm combination along the shared boundary lines with the neighboring San Marino PDI Deviation Narrative Page 1 of 2 PUD to the south, Willow Run. This is in addition to the approved fence/wall/berm heights along Collier Boulevard and around the project perimeter. The proposed 12-foot fence/wall/berm combination will mitigate potential visual and noise impacts from the neighboring residential tracts within Willow Run. The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening between the proposed residential uses, while ensuring a quality design aesthetic via screening of the wall by required perimeter plantings.Willow Run is permitted for multi- family buildings up to 75 feet in height, while San Marino is strictly limited to single-family dwelling types at a maximum height of 35 feet.Therefore,the additional wall/fence/berm height will enhance compatibility, and assist in screening differing residential uses, building heights, and associated densities across these projects. Deviation 5: Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.6.5, Model Homes and Model Sales Centers, which permits a maximum of five (5) model homes, or a number corresponding to ten (10) percent of the total number of platted lots, whichever is less, per platted approved development prior to final plat approval. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of six (6) model homes per development tract, not to exceed 17 model homes within the overall RPUD. As part of the application material for every building permit for a model home, the developer shall provide documentation stating how many model homes are in existence so that the maximum of 17 model homes is not exceeded. Deviation 6: Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, Temporary Signs, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height. The requested deviation is to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height.The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 28 days per calendar year. Deviation 7: Deviation#7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.8.6, Development Standards for Signs within Residential Districts, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development with a maximum height of 8'and total sign area of 64 square feet.The requested deviation is to allow for two(2)ground signs per project entrance with a maximum height of 10' and total sign area of 80 square feet per sign. Deviation 8: Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02C., Buffer Requirements, which requires a fifteen foot (15') Type "B" landscape buffer where single-family residential uses are proposed adjacent to multi-family residential uses,to allow a ten foot(10')Type"B" buffer where proposed single-family dwellings in the San Marino RPUD are adjacent to multi-family dwellings in the Willow Run RPUD along the southern and eastern property lines, and where proposed single-family dwellings are adjacent to multi-family dwellings in Aventine at Naples to the south. San Marino PDI Deviation Narrative Page 2 of 2 SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 SOUTHERN BUFFER CROSS SECTIONS ,,_.—..,..,„,, . ,.._......... .. 1 . ,. 1 1 1 P. N W T O m b z o n VJ C 0 M C A co z M w -I iii? Zi 4Fir -I o monommemomm w m � o I M z -< T W CO O C Z —n o a 73 j N M m I 1[11 X z n E m A 1 0 3 z . t O • z I I F r. .. a Z P i Z� ■ R a 32 lig, a a E 7,0 g• O P.11-;3= /—/ 10'WIDE gl' 1-?? b i Oil ZO „.._,..,_,,,.„..._......,.,„,..._...,..,.: COI 1 Co %, .1 tri: Ni...0.1.• .1 N 1 M , N Z I ©1 0 CDD 0 E p c m 1 CK . AtH 0 1 co M w Z � Itr z wI hin z oI CO QI m A T ' - �1 W m 4 C O c 1 -n z -nzi D ©1 ll zi ;ti rn m I _bolo N n ,r...1--..... m x. =o zm • Q O Owro5, cn cn 0 — Ii, ©► P i g..., r-g 1- 1 /Mr 3 \ i O i x ii _ �� 15'WIDE fr SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 ( CERTIFIED LETTER { 1 gs s /--rc---) c_: T,p-- DEVELOPMENT ik„,....... 0 January 21,2016 Diocese of Venice Attn: Dr.Volodymyr Smeryk 1000 Pinebrook Road Venice,FL 34285 Re: 36 acres—Collier Boulevard,Naples,FL(#00410680007) Dr. Smeryk, You are receiving this letter in reference to your 36-acre vacant parcel located on Collier Boulevard in Naples, FL. As you may be aware, our 196-acre property immediately to the south (San Marino RPUD Ord. 15-30) was approved earlier this year to allow for the development of a maximum of 300 single family homes. The zoning ordinance also provides for a potential vehicular interconnection between properties as shown on the attached PUD Master Plan. Although the future use of your property has not yet been determined, we are offering to incorporate an access point to your property in the engineering design and master planning efforts for our project. The preliminary design for our project entrance features a CON/SPAN bridge to cross the 951 canal,a 2-lane undivided entry road, turn lanes, sidewalks,monument signage, street lighting, etc. If you wish to participate in the design and construction of an access point to serve your property in conjunction with our project, we will proceed with preparing a Development Agreement & Cost Sharing Agreement that will outline the initial capital requirements and on-going maintenance obligations. Our expectation would be a 50/50 split of all costs and expenses associated with the design and construction of the bridge crossing, entry roads, and accompanying capital improvements. The preliminary cost estimate prepared by our civil engineer indicates the total improvement costs will be approximately$3,000,000. Please respond in writing within thirty (30) days with your Notice of Intent to participate in the design. If no response is received,this offer will become null and void and we will proceed with the design without any vehicular interconnection. If you have any questions regarding this project, please feel free to contact me directly at (239) 592-7344 or kgelder(a.stockdevelopment.com. Sincerely, � .eek .Fvi 1 Keith Gelder, Vice President of Land SD San Marino, LLC t a • Forest Glen Gol' + t sz i --N 6 Country Club "'it ,1'.. 1-7 .. n .,,,f d Country Club .r'", I• /' ` ,:------t„..71,it' tt tr . .. . . 4 o t n 4. w .. g 1 - _ , . .., -.,., ,„*,-..-,,w.,A6-.! ,,z7,40.-, - --,... _ , , . ., . . ':.....„ ,..t-'-'3-4.,,,,,,,lip,,,, , -, ' j •1"0 ) . . • .' ' s'' ' j SAN MARINO � . i t � � a • • i 3 $. i • 1 •, + !'w. Naples Heritage Go! `. i r'j &Country Club � [ �� '_ : \ . :` c^ t • 4 � `� ss t 'Z3'- nn '"I`'t'�+ - _ a Pia y .4 1- �, 'San Marino ?r i s ApartmentsI\L a j y i qua � s ;-'. Willow Run . » -• • , j y "r3•,.Li jf �C....•;!..- ! '. y • ems' ^k -,,,44:;1444444,j444!44,,,44":, 447.44.:444,.4/4$ ,yfT' :, 3 .„3 � may n._.„....-14 .,,,,,,r- ^•,/._ -�4 _ )➢ ^ r,; . ...... .....::..:.-.--.:::• , , ., , . , .: : . . ........ , ::,... . .,, 1 .. ,,,,, {� Y 44o ". ,,,,_,, ,"— ..... stir � -.„.i......_. :-= wM wiY�•w•�J�ru�rfMxl�•4dL 7 ..._.... . . „„.....,..•„ . ..... �, t� c' y�t.. eR.•�.. .....a..µ{, t . _ ..-.. a_ ..a.__.. _ ...a...............ia''° #a3`. 'ar' ` iY.43:1`�$:riey#:... _ _ll n nig:1111111 SAN MARINO AERIAL MAP [A,;]• i GI Solutions l V Prepared For: H & LD Venture, LLC EXHIBIT B PARM_S PDQ MASTER MAN. 0 IIIIIIHIIII r li 1pIr g • IX g Si ggi il 1 ---_________-....______ cousERsi_voteani _ g:1 0 II lig III! ' J 1 _ gi II, )m Ig . 1 1 .,...,k„.....„. ...' � ilii is `` M Ili 1 1 I . 1 ::. t 1 pi ; ,, ,,.. 1 1 i 1 > , 1Xi~r . -- „,. ...... ---\\ , L f k t �•_ : ;ia a9 ZZv7 11Pf t 1 b r: 111 1 / Ili i iiiIILc 1 1V 211 Pg ap a ,, mem mararo c mm rs SAN MARINO ARINO AEDN{ P, PUMP iRVO6iPIIACd PTITCPRRI cuENa`il&wTUBE,L.I.C.C. :„: ,,., fr.lizmiammo's,'o rrttawis _ ,, ovbne WAD PPnw11.10urim= PARi78["B"17JDldASiRAFtAN _1B1L `. PUDA-PL-2014-0100 -S iko text is deleted San Manna RPUD Underlinetext is added Last Revised April 17,2015 Page 30 of 33 0 ti ...§::.P6 -t::il . 'CERTIFIED MAIL: RECEIPT r- ..0,, ,,tic Matt OntyL rn . 1:1 'For dolivery HAUT mallon,visil ptjr.y4epSitaAt'Wlyviao.tisTS.COnl-NW .ji - . . ..• ' •''‘ ' ' l', ' . ''' ' , I - ru Cetited Fee =" Postmark CI Return Receipt Fee 11.11111111111 Here =I (Endoreamere ReQutred) Clo (EndoeeReitict8dmeripill'NelYF t Reetilredi OMB ni r-1Total Postage&FateL' $ 69 1 _ —. 0 ---- P- or PO Box No. tr-Nr-e'l Irek LEI:AK__ 'RC.)ad .. %.2,-e:r.o........ Viiiiiiiii,iir4.4 .......- .ps1,7,.0'1806..it 4.131 '7.!.'.';`,,k74,417-1v*,'1:-,:::,- 'irolfyiagoogislawagtm SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO PUD DOCUMENT FOR CAO San Marino RPUD Amend Ordinance 15-30 AMENDMENT TO SECTION V, SECTION VI, AND EXHIBIT B PARCEL B PUD MASTER PLAN OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 15-30, SAN MARINO RPUD. The "Developer Commitments,"labeled as Section V of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 15-30, the San Marino RPUD. "Deviations from LDC,"labeled as Section VI of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 15-30, the San Marino RPUD. "Exhibit B Parcel B PUD Master Plan" attached to Ordinance No. 15-30, the San Mario RPUD, is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced by Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 1 I C ,9 SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 RECORDED WARRANTY DEED { INSTR 5185701 OR 5206 PG 1326 RECORDED 10/21/2015 12:09 PM PAGES 7 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $131,250.00 REC $61.00 1 CONS $18,750,000.00 1 C ri 1 I Prepared by: i i, Law Offices of William G. Morris, P.A. 247 North Collier Boulevard, Suite 202 Marco Island, FL 34145 1 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE is made and entered into as of the 215 day of October, 2015, by and between H & LD Venture, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantor"), whose mailing address is 7995 Mahogany Run Lane, Naples, Florida 34113, + and SD San Marino, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantee"), whose , mailing address is 2647 Professional Circle, Unit 1201, Naples, FL 34119. WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for_ar}d.-inconsideration of the sum of Ten and No 100 Dollars ($10.00) and otyr aI n u�ble consideration in hand paid, the receipt and sufficiency whereopi ,ems acknoWA � has granted, bargained, sold, alienated, remised, released, cp eyed and confirms ti;' and by these presents does hereby grantbargain, sell,1 'lieyratc, re ise release, thgveeand confirm unto Grantee, and Grantee's heirs, success rsi4aridkassigns afever,\\the\following described real AvA property in the County of JCol.riet ' F ' a toy I LIBIlkA i 1 AND INCO P-0ktATED HERE�II lt,E! cE,THERETO, TOGETHER with all th ,tee,ements, hereditariae�ta`d appurtenances, and every privilege, right, title, interest n.d etate, reversion -l;e fainder and easement thereto belonging or in anywise appert `i; rig Qlecti. y ti}' "Property"). SUBJECT TO the encumbrances and exceptions described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference thereto (collectively, "Permitted Exceptions"); provided, however, that neither Grantor nor Grantee intend to reimpose any Permitted Exceptions nor shall this conveyance operate to reimpose or extend any Permitted Exceptions. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. 1 And Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to the Property, subject to and except for the Permitted Exceptions, and will defend the same, subject to and except for the Permitted Exceptions, against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. [SIGNATURES CONTAINED ON FOLLOWING PAGE) i 0 OR 5206 PG 1327 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused these presents to be signed and sealed the day and year above written. Signed, sealed and delivered H & LD Venture, LLC, in the pre - - of: a Flo '• . 'mited li iI: • pany psi. . . I► • Al: Le . By: P �1 (Witness •gnature) ✓✓1, , ,� Name: Joseph D. Boff Print Witness Name Y,�11 Lti<�.1.1-• MDit/P its: ! ager MA-A• 9kt,4t. � At-,tc.. (Witness Signature) Print Witness Name: JAME E 61Acr Ill) R COQ' STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instr i�rr t was ac nowle.5,d b=for- - this ["i 'day of October, 2015, by Joseph D. Boff, e Manager, of S_Lo y-tftire, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on behal . id company. Fie s7 sal- one]: ( �ersonally known e ne,; o � � r �E CI ( ) produced a valid driver's license as ide tifica ion. 7) 67'2111->) Notary PAH S•gnatur-) a°"��•;°4 PEGILEE H.MORRIS Print Name: G4 A r/ i •' r j * : , MY COMMISSION t FF 142593 7` , EXPIRES:July 17,2018 Wed My Commission Expires:6t)1. 11101 2 OR 5206 PG 1328 1 Exhibit "A" TRACT 1: Parcel ID: 0041084009 The Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and Parcel ID: 00411200004, Parcel ID: 00411240006, and Parcel ID: 0041088001 The Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and Parcel ID: 00411320007 The Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4..-of-Seeta.00 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and �� C i Parcel ID: 00410640005 '1 1 I The Southeast 1/4 of the Northvies f4zof; esti r,11, whship 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; ian Pr/ \ ---- ,\,17-7\----v7 ' 1 -\(py Parcel ID: 00411640004 \ r The North 1/2 of the North 1/ _: f the Southwest t o t�h1.,:k rthwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 Collier County\NN,., ,_, , P'iayd _1e is the West 100 feet; and , Parcel ID: 00410960002 C)P ., - � ,� LTi CI13-L. The South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the SouThWesf 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less the West 100 feet; and Parcel ID: 00411440000 The North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, fess the West 100 feet. Being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the West 1/4 corner of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East of Collier County, Florida; thence along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, N 00 degrees 50'48" E, a distance of 344.19 feet, to the Southwest corner of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; thence leaving the said West line and along the South line of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, N 87 degrees 55'08" E, a distance of 100.13 feet, to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described; thence it N 00 degrees 50'48" E, a distance of 1032.30 feet, being 100.00 feet Easterly and 1 parallel to the said West line; thence along the North line of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, N 88 degrees 04'51" E, a distance of 1234.18 feet to the Southwest corner of Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 OR 5206 PG 1329 of said Section 11; thence along the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; N 00 degrees 49'48" E, a distance of 1371.72 feet, to the Northwest corner of Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; N 88 degrees 17'49" E, a distance of 1333.66 feet, to the North 1/4 corner of said Section 11; thence along the North line of Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11, N 88 degrees 17'56" E, a distance of 1333.62 feet, to the Northeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the East line of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11, S 00 degrees 47'44" W, a distance of 2723.17 feet to the Southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the East to West 1/4 line of said Section 11, S 87 degrees 51'54" W, a distance of 2669.89 feet to the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11; thence along the west line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, N 00 degree 49'48" E, a distance of 342.93 feet to the Southeast corner of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11; thence along the South line of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, S 47—de—s15.' 8" W, a distance of 1234.66 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel elkc'i~ i' 1e : , 7c)C ------- -'--,ke.3,, AND: \--------n 7/ TRACT 2: } / \t'l U JMitigation Parcel 1:Parcel ID '00-3384 0002` ' / /! The West 1/2 of the Northwe*t 114 of the Southea. t ./ / P the Northeast 1/4 of Section 31, Township 49 South' r# afiq`e 27 East, Cotler_,Co r��i, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 2: Parcel ID#'� 4508000 / The North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of-t �$p Vg --of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 3: Parcel ID#: 00352680000 The East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 less the East 35 feet thereof dedicated for road purposes, and the East 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 , less the East 35 feet thereof dedicated for road purposes of Section 35, Township 49 south, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. • Mitigation Parcel 4: Parcel ID#: 00350720001 The East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, less the East 35 feet of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 5:Parcel ID#: 00351480007 The West 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4, less the West 35 feet thereof, of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 6:Parcel ID#: 00352160009 ort 5206 PG 1330 The East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4, less the East 35 feet thereof dedicated for road purposes, and the West 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the south 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4, less the West 35 feet thereof dedicated for road purposes, and the West 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4, less the West 35 feet thereof dedicated for road purposes of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 7:Parcel ID#: 00352880004 The South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, less and except the East 35 feet thereof. Mitigation Parcel 8:Parcel ID#: 00455120001 The Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 9: Parcel ID#:,06-4-1- 4S � o�„. The North 1/2 of the West 1/2 0 't i'e ilVest 1/2 of the*( h 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 23, ToGvhslfip 50 South, Rang "27 ast, Collier County, Florida. 7 Mitigation Parcel 10:ParceiID'#:`O'74 0 0. The North 1/2 of the EastIi kif-/2 N , W- I' ' fire Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, Township 51 South, Range 27 Cal er oL1 ,V 1.-,i a. \,-Nik_,,_ \,..,____},- , F---)- Mitigation Parcel 11: Parcet`Ib# 0746880005 The Northeast 1/4 of the So it st 1/4 AND the fe•t f the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, To nthi 51 South, Rang st, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 12:Parcel ID ':-.007#47880A1� � ��✓ The South 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the'lCtorttii . st_174"of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 13:Parcel ID#: 00450840001 The North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 14: Intentionally omitted Mitigation Parcel 15:Parcel ID#: 00746960006 The West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 16: Parcel ID: 0034996005 The East 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, less the East 35 feet thereof, dedicated for road purposes and the East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, less the East 35 feet thereof, dedicated for road purposes, all lying and being in Section 35, Township 49 South , Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. OR 5206 PG 1331 EXHIBIT B Permitted Exceptions 1. Taxes and assessments for the year 2015 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. 2. Florida Power&Light Company Right-of-Way Agreement recorded in Official Records Book 663, Page 594. (as to Tract 1). 3. Florida Power&Light Company Right-of-Way Agreement recorded in Official Records Book 664, Page 1488. (as to Tract 1) 4. Florida Power&Light Company Right-of-Way Agreement recorded in Official Records Book 666, Page 521. (as to Tract 1) 5. Resolution No. CWS-85-4 record di_10. k ds Book 1142, Page 1796. (as to Tract 1) 6. Easements contained in Order' eking recorded in ici Records Book 3927, Page 3243. (as to Tract 1) 7. Temporary Construction as- - a '"�• T king recorded in Official Records Book 4030, Page 2363. (as ,• ra 1. LW 8. Property is subject to Colli ounty Ordinance ond/ r RJ utions which establish mandatory garbage and solid waste c \ kon in Collier Coin( •, a ��p#- perry is subject to all assessments made under said Ordinance a olutions. (as to ,,,��tsfand 2) ON`� 9. The nature, extent or existence D rpyi -. to Tracts 1 and 2) 10. Rights of predecessors in title, and all persons claiming by,through or under same, by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described in Schedule A, as recorded in Deed Book 30, Page 91, as affected by Notice of Interest recorded in Official Records Book 4586, Page 412. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 16) 11. Rights of predecessors in title, and all persons claiming by,through or under same, by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described in Schedule A, as recorded in Deed Book 33, Page 445. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 1) 12. Rights of predecessors in title, and all persons claiming by,through or under same, by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described in Schedule A, as contained in Deed Book 36, Page 378. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 2) 13. Rights of predecessors in title, and all persons claiming by,through or under same, by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described in Schedule A, as recorded in Deed Book 40, Page 185. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 3,4, 5, 6, 7 and 16) 14. Rights of predecessors in title, and all persons claiming by,through or under same, by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described *** OR 5206 PG 1332 *** in Schedule A, as recorded in Official Records Book 6, Page 269, Official Records Book 6, Page 270 and Official Records Book 6, Page 273. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 13) 15. Restrictions and right of way reservation set forth in the Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 25, Page 608. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 1) 16. Rights of predecessors in title, and all persons claiming by, through or under same, by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described in Schedule A, as recorded in Official Records Book 613, Page 714, as affected by Notice of Interest recorded in Official Records Book 4598, Page 2925. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 8 and 9) 17. Rights of predecessors in title, and all persons claiming by, through or under same, by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described in Schedule A, as recorded in Official Records Book 613, Page 730, as affected by Notice of Interest recorded in Official Records Boa 9, —Page 2925. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 10, 11, 12 and 15) o� 18. Easement for roadway grantecA b ed recorded in O ciat ecords Book 696, Page 575. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 97 Is \ 19. Easement for roadway seifo h"` ' i r''' k r e Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels1 101 1 , i n 1: , Oal Records Book 697, Page 381. (As to 20. Easement for roadway respt�v d in Deed record6.3d in ffic�a`C�F�`ecords Book 698, Page 451. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 9 /0/21. Easement for roadwa reservfi ! Y 40 @e,e`ds recorde�.ir Mitial Records Book 742, Page 1214. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 8) c_92" OE Citc- 22. Easement for roadway reserved in Deed recorded in Official Records Book 759, Page 1564. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 10, 11, 12 and 15) 23. Reservation of easement contained in Special Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 1362, Page 829. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 12) 24. Easement for roadway set forth in Deeds recorded in Official Records Book 2132, Page 313, Official Records Book 3194, Page 2705 and Official Records Book 3194, Page 2707. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 10, 11, 12 and 15) 25. Easement for roadway set forth in Deeds recorded in Official Records Book 2392, Page 3263. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 8) 30. Subject to terms and conditions of the"Collier County Transfer of Development Rights Program" as referenced in Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 3673, Page 2843. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 3) NOTE: ALL RECORDING REFERENCES SET FORTH ON THIS EXHIBIT"B"SHALL REFER TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Legal Description of Property The Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and The Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and The Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and The Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and The North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,Florida, less the West 100 feet; and The South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less the West 100 feet; and The North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,Florida, less the West 100 feet. Being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the West 1/4 corner of Section 11,Township 50 South, Range 26 East of Collier County,Florida; thence along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, N 00 degrees 50'48" E, a distance of 344.19 feet, to the Southwest corner of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; thence leaving the said West line and along the South line of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, N 87 degrees 55'08" E, a distance of 100.13 feet, to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described;thence N 00 degrees 50'48" E, a distance of 1032.30 feet, being 100.00 feet Easterly and parallel to the said West line; thence along the North line of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, N 88 degrees 04'51" E, a distance of 1234.18 feet to the Southwest corner of Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11;N 00 degrees 49'48" E, a distance of 1371.72 feet,to the Northwest corner of Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; N 88 degrees I7'49" E, a distance of 1333.66 feet, to the North 1/4 corner of said Section 11; thence along the North line of Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11,N 88 degrees 17'56" E, a distance of 1333.62 feet,to the Northeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the East line of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11, S 00 degrees 47'44" W, a distance of 2723.17 feet to the Southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the East to West 1/4 line of said Section 11, S 87 degrees 51'54" W, a distance of 2669.89 feet to the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11; thence along the west line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, N 00 degree 49'48" E, a distance of 342.93 feet to the Southeast corner of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11;thence along the South line of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, S 87 degrees 55'08" W, a distance of 1234.66 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel described herein. SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION W/ LIST IDENTIFYING OWNER & ALL PARTIES OF CORPORATION g 1 i 0 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PDI-PL20160000263 Brian Stock (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable)of SO San Marino.LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath,that I am the (choose one)owner v applicant contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Waldrop Engineering,P.A.c/a Alexis Crespo _ to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: e If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp.pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner"of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee': • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. &-L441 moi•-,` e c. I'':q—1 ( , i Signature Date / STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on k." -cl`k (date) by c-- c.-.-ct 5 �-Y--- _, ame of person providing oath or affirmation), as whdpersonally known to or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. 0 \ �� STAMP/SEAL Signature oftary Public ,,4,:',",::::,,,,,i , STACEY LYNN ANDERSON . .`%: Notary Public-State of Florida I•' :•e My Comm.Expires Nov 18,2017 M °i " Commission*FF 061180 1 i',, :• Bonded Through National Naar'Assn. F CP108-00A-001151155 REV 3/24/14 Detail by Entity Name Page 1 of 2 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE 4114, ° DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS .54tz , . Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company SD SAN MARINO, LLC Filing Information Document Number L15000161696 FEI/EIN Number NONE Date Filed 09/23/2015 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event LC STMNT OF AUTHORITY 21 Event Date Filed 10/13/2015 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 2647 PROFESSIONAL CIR#1201 NAPLES, FL 34119 Mailing Address 2647 PROFESSIONAL CIR#1201 NAPLES, FL 34119 Registered Agent Name&Address COLEMAN,YOVANOVICH&KOESTER, P.A. 4001 TAMIAMI TRL N#300 NAPLES, FL 34103-3556 Authorized Personts) Detail Name&Address Title MGR STOCK, BRIAN K 2647 PROFESSIONAL CIR#1201 NAPLES, FL 34119 Annual Reports No Annual Reports Filed Document Images 10/13/2015--CORLCAUTH View image in PDF format 09/23/2015--Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 11/24/2015 SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 APPROVED COMPLETED ADDRESSING CHECKLIST CIL County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE www.colliergov.net NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252.5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL(Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP(Site Development Plan) ❑ BD(Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI(Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU(Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP(Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI(Insubstantial Change to SIP ❑ FP (Final Plat ) ❑ LLA(Lot Line Adjustrnent) ❑ SNR(Street Name Change) ❑ PNC(Project me Change) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change—Unplatted) ❑ PPL(Plans& Plat Review) ❑ TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ VA(Variance) ❑ PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) E] PUD Rezone ❑ VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ RZ(Standard Rezone) ❑ VRSFP(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) OTHER PDI LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description maybe attached) Portions of Section 11 S 11 T 50 R 26 FOLIO(Property ID) NUMBER(s)of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) See attached Folio list. STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME(if applicable) San Marino RPUD PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL# Co ter County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for,or already appearing in, condominium documents(if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Lindsay Rodriguez Phone: 239-405-7777 Email/Fax: lindsay.rodriguez@waldropengineering.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number See Attached Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: 1/26/2016 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED SAN MARINO PUD FOLIO IDs 00411440000 00410960002 00411640004 00410840009 00410640005 00411320007 00410880001 00411240006 00411200004 armiiiiirommiwillom SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) CPDI-PL20160000263 LOCATION MAP 1 1 1 i 4 1 : CI A 1 i 1 I 1 i C 1 1 f I h /j 3]§]9 Y 4111 San Marino RPUD Location Map _ r• i NORTH . f k /,)--t. r --ifiri \-----d illh011iiii ` ' 1 �" 1 Y''' ht 1 '/I; r 1 ), P�..._._._ ROJECT �' / � _T i ' LOCATION, � q7 fry . ,.t( Y C , } 2 .,,\11 ,.) 1 t ! t Th a--- ____,if --- ( I RRA71 $N,AKE HAMMO C.1(a 2 C SECTION VI DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC * * * * * * * * * * * * * The following deviations are applicable to Parcel B only: 2. Deviation (2)from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2, Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks which are internal to the development to be constructed on both sides of local streets, to allow a 6'-wide sidewalk on one side of the street only for streets with homes on one side of the street,and _ _ . - _ e •- _ - _ •- • _ • - • • _ - . Onecanopytree (or canopy tree equivalents shall be provided per 30 linear feet of sidewalk. Canopy trees located within 10 feet of the sidewalk may count towards a sidewalk canopy tree. This deviation does not apply to the main entry road depicted on the PUD Master Plan for Parcel B. 4. Deviation (4) from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, which permits a maximum wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum wall height of 8 feet throughout the development, a a 12-foot tall masonry wall, berm, or combination wall/berm along Collier Blvd., and a 12-foot tall combination wall/berm with a maximum wall height of 8 feet along the southern boundary line where the RPUD abuts the Willow Run RPUD. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Words underlined are added; works s#-144,th-rough are deleted. CI.Cg 3 $ a x ^f LLo aawn,ol I-I 0? � f 1 c4 =W IjtiJjI Q o u Q ,.5 3 z , cd e z I r W A Q o a w. _ I Z o_ .N.0...) z z Ea O U 2 K A .) m cc z i Et in I V W z QLL D O CO • rt W Q a I a Zve W ilg b > NimmEmmt NF- 1 Z ii iii. ...0....e.f7 O 1_1_1T 2 0 O0 w D LuI mo ci ci I— b Q= 0 imi 0 >- w CC z Z J O Q 2 iN1 0.11) 151,2, i 1 1 a R R OP"'il rl yet 1 Oz I301M,S60WAHii 4H: a ift • 0 0 w o p z 1111 z z P D 11=a o 0 cp w#= co 11 ' ce Z f 0 riti a W } LL Z o CO ► m ► Y ilo ,r i-- m 0I a z ► I LU — 65 ^ o c$011011) NZ CK (111) 1= wZ0 _' w�11) ci IH in JQ DO 044 0 N 0 , ,, 5/12/2015 9.B. AGENDA ITEM 9-C Co er County STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM; ZONING SERVICES DIVISION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: APRIL 2,2015 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20140000100, SAN MARINO RPUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) (COMPANION ITEM TO SMALL SCALE OMPA TO SAN MARINO RPUD, PL201400001 1 3/CP-2014-2) PROPERTY OWNER& APPLICANT/AGENT: Applicant/Petitioner: Owner: Stock Development H& LD Venture LLC c/o Keith Gelder c% Joseph Boil 2647 Professional Circle,Suite 1201 7995 Mahogany Run Lane Naples,FL 34110 Naples,FL 34113 Agents: Alexis V.Crespo,AICP Mr. Richard Yovanovich, Esquire Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Coleman Yovanovich &Koester, P.A. 28100 Bonita Grande Drive,Suite 305 4001 Tamiami Trail North Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Naples,FL 34103 NOTE: The owner noted above only owns Parcel B which is the subject of this amendment application. Tract A is owned by Aventine of Naples, LLC; 1427 Clarkview Road; Suite 500; Baltimore, MD 21209 and is already developed and not affected by this amendment. REOUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Conunission (CCPC) to consider an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2000-10 (see Attachment) which established the San Marino Planned Unit Development(PUD) to increase the maximum dwelling units from 352 to 650;to remove the Golf Course Uses; to establish two Development Parcels: Parcel A and Parcel B; to add Permitted Uses for Parcel B; to add Development Standards for Parcel B; to add Deviations; to revise the Master Plan;and to revise the Developer Commitments, PUDA-PL20140000100. SAN MARINO RPUD Page 1 of 27 March 17.2015 Packet Page -99- ...-�a _ -OOT- abed lapped 1 Iii I al I It 041 i I- ,,uji . _. r ..if . I, q .',...z, . . / ,, , 1 MIK 1.01 f r- t --inr 11 1._ „, a_St:" kl Ca > ti u [ V Ai I 4 g If $i al., g a 8 i q I___7 VPIIIIfe ileatemilm CA ow i s 'J!7T d 1,,i 7F-1 Ertl L . ______q. 71 0V) y4 rn ii O C:::o z m ro i '19 i 1t ,y.. I� /t 1L. .y.IR. ... C� S�" y lie. l� fight r. E1.4.��++.g,�*.C, cmi�a ecusw� c•.ni — — _ — — :... , r_ lit , N iti 11 4_ 0 ,,,_ , _ill , . . . .. . . . . ___ ._„.. .....,..... , _ _.. _ z . , ..._,,,,,..-7-_-_-. ic..... 0 • \iiii..._14\4144:0000 —1411111111111, -13 11 • ti: I i S r '9'6 51.OZ/Z 1,/9 -IOI- aged Ia)IDed A W N m r- ZD X 111 B3 -im vpr DZ 10Cm ONye Z C— D C Dorn OF-0°M� z2 -Z{ °co ,3,-ro CG)ZOZ �n'_-I-�I��aC -IC rn �CO� m3D eco m ODZOn'mC m3 ?rx r_`m� 3oz ommwcn Cx>0 . z, -DO Or Zc14� mv_� m.. CnS �r vCicclD CT 013 Daum, �30 00�m m`mC-IrZ Gu' CX 0-1- CnDz -r,1 -V' 111 .Z°1�" Om _ -_ c>i -im v- -0 Zcl-t m _._ COLLIER BLVDlCR951 Om 00 Zein rnD m m 3 g m D 0 {� m Tree o eUrreR m oy aO'D DZ Z m M Z xi -n-< m m,' O y A cMr �� m=.Zm7 y '(t ..... ZNmco °rn r D OOyD zg o_r_ vz D czcz 111 0 Gr1 ° . O �m 3 9 mpW m1D�_ C3Z Oa 1Gm7m 1 `` m Dz v z '1121-nr BUFFER PER LDC J ... *i.-,-•0,..4-;, , xi 400,.. ......,... ii" .......... ._ _ .....,,, o col IIIIMPAIIIII/riAl :YL Fill hP § roril, 15 1 m ,E1 = _ *1gC XI!BB ` 3om 1 �� PCZ .: I , 0,m C m I ` r1 55 r 111WIII c. . ' I_ I!r r- F:' %. c...., oc rCP —I A A 11) m i;, ` m CA m 1O A -•1 l a1 I'.. v v m v v D 0 D D• D O • m m D M m m C 3 m m_ '1 r Co D m co D Ca Z C Co D m _i m O O O m z O .- x x \"1"7°� x -x x x x - NO BUNNARE0UgE0 m m m - C j o ) -13 0 in r o v u m y rn y me — cn mX Cid CO Axocl11 w RI 3 co CO mtdzcnkz O 2 Czz91 ISx n _ QcNcl) m Om o'a (41g N.)w zCh�mom co m x m z o " 0 "cm n m r- -I> m m m O m N.) w m v cNa N cn o v co w rn 1 N- IF N m C C F1 iD u - ppA ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL:C6/13/14 1; PLAN REVISIONS Wf08114 REVISED PER COUNIY'COMMENTS SAN VT M A 1)�'-T�.T %r1 WALDROP m ® 11/12/14 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS `'+ ^+` 1.1' u�y`O ( i 1 ENGINEERING # 01108H5 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS CLIENT:H&LD VENTURE,L.L.C. _� a M PARCEL"B"PUD MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT B .:t. �iiarai.er:w4awwaiiwriaaanat .21...,,11 22...422, rmowlno.an.2y> '8'6 51,02/Z I45 1 -ZOT- abed la)loed 0' . If _ .4....4,1, , , , _..,,.._,_,,.... JIMINIams if_. risiril-Ettlq i 1 l" -' .1 r____.• --K----,. .....:_„ t..._„.,,,• • .• I ' c 5 • I s -7.: 14. :1.;_ . ; . ii.r-•....."-i--;:.,,.., ..-"N. ,.,,,, ari ',1:rui,_,..„7-4-.',4.!,.n§ i• , 1 .1 ! .1:1 y 1110 ii. , , r- ill illg . i , li ' I: ',8 3 j: II III I ? 1 i: -*-t ' ' 4 1" - :.1 . .1 I r 1 14 t.'l :II I ! ;lit, 111.17x111 • -Firr...,--, I . -1 c ! ! L i 11 1 q ,i . +. I MIMI 1 . , . i „ . , , _____ _ _______ ___puLSL(.125' R").._______—__________ ; iiro.;:6—--—--—-— --— ................pt....-- - --.. -- E. 14:4 ..,„ • 13 . C .kli !9(10 110111W - C CD ; .4% < 4 I 1,1 r : —• -1:1 ,1: I : c Q • . 0 ,, 1 • ....„ o 1 ,-, 1:”. Z 47r—C-,41r ---• 4 Ca --- ! zi , ii. --iii.„....,...dim, 1 —....„„, r -: . . . , < DO —42 ---• .. 1 c• r_u 0 CD co _.--- ir.: Z - . - -0 . . i su . .! = II • 1 1 L . . • 1 . . . c IC • • • ' 11 . • . : P:11 I . • • . . . . . • . . . • . • . A • . . . . . • . • . A . • A . . . • •i , . . . . . . • • • . . . . . . . • , . . • . . • • • • 1 . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . • . . . - . . . . . ... ,.. . . • . . • . . . • . • • 1 _ .. , _____ , ..., .., ..... ....IMOD .0.3amo.L.Mommt ........ Ja.1-344 era/E5tate ir.. t.n-htnts 5AN MACINO 14117A- 1 — ..„...... ..._ ..... Exhrbtt "A" ,-.vir.e....r:rnmtuu 0...imemt• ""--` PILO, M.3-Acr Flan - 1 5/12/2015 9.B. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 2351 acres, is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard approximately nine tenths of a mile north of The Lords Way,in Sections 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,Florida(See Location Map on the previous page.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: According to the application,the following changes are being requested: • Increase the maximum density from 352 dwelling units to 650 dwelling units (see below for more information); • Amend Section I of the PUD Document— "Property Ownership and Description" to reflect existing conditions and address increased density; • Amend Section II of the PUD Document— "Project Development Requirements" to correct LDC references and address increased density; • Amend Section III of the PUD Document— "Residential/Golf Course Areas Plan" to add single-family detached, zero lot line, two-family, duplex dwelling types, and clubhouse, and provide for development standards; • Amend Section IV of the PUD Document— "Preserve Areas Plan" to add permitted uses; • Amend Section V of the PUD Document— "Development Commitments" to reflect existing conditions and the modified development program; • Add Section VI of the PUD Document— "Deviations from the LDC;" • Amend Exhibit A of the PUD Document—PUD Master Plan; and • Add Exhibit B "Parcel B PUD Master Plan. " The applicant offers the following as supplemental information to support the requested changes: The request for bonus density of 2.5 units per gross acre (on the 196 acres controlled by the Applicant) will allow for a maximum unit count of 843 dwelling units, calculated as follows: Table 1:Proposed Density DU/AC ACREAGE MAX ALLOWABLE DENSITY Existing Base Density 1.5 235+1-- 352 d.u. Proposed Bonus Density 1.525 196.4+7--#' 298 du. TOTAL 650 d u. *Total San Marino PUD acreage **Parcel "B"acreage The density increase will be achieved through the use of transferable development rights(TDRs). The applicant offered the following synopsis of previous history for the subject site: The Property was originally rezoned in 2000 from Rural Agriculture ("A') and Rural Agriculture with Special Treatment Overlay ("A-ST") to PUD, allowing for the development of the property with a maximum of 352 dwelling units, a golf course, and preserves. The approval PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 5 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -103- 5/12/2015 9.B. utilized the "base density" of 1.5 dwelling unitsper gross acre permitted in the Urban Residential Fringe (URF)Subdistrict. In 2002 approximately 39 acres of the PUD was developed with 350 multi family dwelling units known as the "Aventine at Naples" apartment complex, effectively utilizing all of the available base density for the entire PUD. The intent at that time for the remaining 196 acres was for development as a private golf course and club. Since the rezoning approval, market demand for stand-alone golf courses and golf course communities has significantly decreased, along with their financial feasibility. In response to Staff's questions at the pre-application meeting, the golf course was not intended as a private amenity for the 350 apartment homes, and it's removal through this petition will not impact any rights enjoyed by residents of Aventine at Naples. In February 2014, Stock Development and H& LD Venture, LLC filed a Growth Management Plan Amendment to allow: 1) density bonus of up to 2.5 units per gross acre via the transfer of up to 2.5 units(transferable development rights)per acre from lands designated as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands; and 2) to allow the use of TDR's from any lands designated as Sending within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, thereby omitting the requirement to obtain TDR's from lands within one (1) mile of the Urban Boundary. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: an undeveloped, 37± acre Agricultural (A) zoned parcel and Forest Glen of Naples PUD, a developed residential golf course community East: an undeveloped, 560± acre Willow Run PUD, approved for a maximum of 590 units [Willow Run,PUDZ-PL20140000682] South: an undeveloped, 560± acre Willow Run PUD, approved for a maximum of 590 units [Willow Run,PUDZ-PL20140000682] West: Collier Boulevard (CR 951), then Naples National Golf Club PUD, a developed golf course PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 6 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -104- 5/12/2015 9.B. 4 " 1 :i ! -i[ r' l k: ,. i -- w : ' '` y —',, i, P t4 ♦J rn .M1i 1 a 11 r a .fir .$ Aar 1. 7 * Qi-' IA 1 +r. - Subject 1 1 Property �, . " i I 1 _. it �.; � , . „ I 1 # , limo lluG Lmoret.-it,!r 4r,R- _., {._�t1 Si !?44. ( ". I 1 _ I t� Aerial Photo (subject property depiction is approximate) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMF)CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban. Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe (UR F) Subdistrict, as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and addressed in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). This petition relies on recently transmitted (final adoption hearing anticipated to be on or about May 12, 2015) amendments of provisions in the FLUE to achieve consistency, That amendment (reference CP-2014-2/PL20140000113) changes the URF Subdistrict to allow the use of TDRs derived residential density from more than one(I) mile from the Urban Boundary so as to allow PUDA-PL20140000100 SAN MARINO RPUD Page 7 of 27 March 17. 2015 Packet Page -105- 5/12/2015 9.B. the utilization of TDR credits from any Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) Sending Lands to achieve a density of 3.02 units per acre in the undeveloped portion of the San Marino RPUD(196.4 acres). The URF Subdistrict encourages a rezone to be in the form of a planned unit development. San Marino began as a PUD and is proposed here as a PUD amendment. Density calculations are shown in the table below. PUDA Subject Site=235 acres (the entire San Marino PUD) Base density(presently allowed) 1.5 DU/ac 352 DUs Base density(presently allowed and developed) 1.5 DU/ac 350 DUs REMAINDER (presently allowed, unused and available for development) 1.5 DU/ac 2 DUs GMPA Subject Site=196.4 acres (the undeveloped portion of San Marino PUD) Base density(all but 2 DU used in the developed portion of 1.5 DU/ac 2 DUs San Marino PUD) TDR density(presently allowed) 1.0 DU/ac 196 DUs TDR density increase—the GMPA petition 0.52 DU/ac 102 DUs SUM 3.02 DU/ac 300 DUs DUs already developed in San Marino PUD(Base density) 350 DUs to be developed in undeveloped portion of San 300 Marino PUD(Base &TDR density) Total DUs to be built in the PUD 650 DUs The provisions of the URF Subdistrict and the Density Rating System proposed in the companion GMP amendment are listed below, followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. URF Subdistrict subsection a.iii. provides that "Up to 1.52 units per acre may be achieved for Urban Residential Fringe lands within the 196.4 acre portion of the San Marino Planned Unit Development described below, via the transfer of 1.52 dwelling units (transferable development right) per acre. The Property shall not be subject to the one mile limitation set forth above and may utilize TDRs derived from any lands designated Sending within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District to achieve up to the maximum allowable density. The Property is further described as follows: That portion of the San Marino Planned Unit Development described in Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended, excepting the 39±acres located in the South '/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11,Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and in the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11,Township 50 South, Range 26 East." The Density Rating System, Density Bonuses' subsection 2.f.(c)iii. provides (similarly) that "Up to 1.52 additional units per acre may be achieved for Urban Residential Fringe lands within the 196.4 acre portion of the San Marino Planned Unit Development described below, via the transfer of 1.52 dwelling units (transferable development right) per acre. The Property shall not PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 8 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -106- it 5/12/2015 9.B. be subject to the one mile limitation set forth above and may utilize TDRs derived from any lands designated Sending within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District to achieve up to the maximum allowable density. The Property is further described as follows: That portion of the San Marino Planned Unit Development described in Ordinance No. 2000- 10, as amended, excepting the 39±acres located in the South '/2 of the Southwest 'A of the Northwest %4 of Section 11,Township 50 South, Range 26 East,and in the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest'A of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East." [This PUD amendment would increase the approved density in the undeveloped portion of the San Marino RPUD from 2.5 DU/acre to 3.02 DU/acre. The requested density is consistent with Subdistrict and Density Rating System provisions. Comprehensive Planning staff points out that the LDC requires that TDR credits be utilized in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.03.07.D.4.g. The PUDA application requests a deviation from the LDC requirement to utilize TDRs proportionately (which would be 54 percent Base DUs and 46 percent TDR DUs). Of the 650 DUs proposed, 352 are derived from Base density and 298 DUs are derived from TDRs. However, as 350 DUs are already built — all from Base density — only 2 Base density DUs remain. Staff has no objection to allowing the 2 Base DUs to be built prior to requiring use of TDRs.] Main URF Subdistrict provisions provide that"Proposed development in the Subdistrict shall be fully responsible for all necessary water management improvements, including the routing of all on-site and appropriate off-site water through the project's water management system, and a fair share cost of necessary improvements to the CR 951 canal/out-fall system made necessary by new development in the Subdistrict." [Comprehensive Planning defers to the Engineering Services staff as part of their review of the petition.] FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with the surrounding land area. [Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. Please refer to PUD Findings and Rezone Findings.] In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [This site fronts PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 9 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page-107- 5/12/2015 9.B. Collier Boulevard. Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan, depicts a single, direct access to Collier Boulevard (CR 951), classified as an arterial road in the Transportation Element.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan, depicts an internal road configuration providing internalized accesses and a loop roadway. All vehicular traffic accesses Collier Boulevard (CR 951)from the single street access.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [Transportation Policy 9.3 provides that "The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments". LDC Section 6.06.O1.B provides that "The street layout of all subdivisions or developments shall be coordinated with the street systems of the surrounding areas, [and] adjacent properties shall be provided with local street interconnections unless topography, other natural features, or other ordinances/regulations do not allow or require said connections". Local street connections with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments are not disallowed by other ordinances or regulations, and appear to be feasible on two sides of the subject site, as follows: • Land to the north the subject PUD is developed as Forest Glen Golf& Country Club, where predominantly Golf Course, Open Space and Preserve areas lying along the adjacent boundary appear to make vehicular interconnection infeasible. • Willow Run earth mining property lies to the east of the subject PUD. Willow Run is presently approved for a residential PUD, where a Preserve area lying along the northerly two-thirds of the common boundary appears to make vehicular interconnection infeasible. A portion of the Willow Run PUD residential development area lying along the southerly one-third of the common boundary does not provide interconnection points,and makes vehicular interconnection infeasible. • Land to the south (southeasterly) is approved for a residential PUD, but still developed with Willow Run earth mining uses. A portion of the Willow Run PUD residential development area lying along the southerly common boundary does not provide interconnection points [east of the FPL easement], and makes vehicular interconnection infeasible. The Willow Run PUD does provide for interconnection west of the FPL easement, with the developed "Parcel A" component of the San Marino PUD, making vehicular interconnection fully feasible. • Collier Boulevard lies to the west of a portion of the subject PUD. Land to the west (a ±37 acre tract), between this site and Collier Boulevard,is developable land lying in the URF Subdistrict—where interconnection is possible and appears feasible. PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 10 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -108- 5/12/2015 9.B. An `internal' interconnection between the developed "Parcel A" component of the San Marino PUP and the undeveloped portion of the PUD is feasible. An interconnection point is designated on the current Master Plan for San Marino between these 2 properties. It should remain as an important design element in support of this Policy. However, this amendment eliminates that internal interconnection. The absence of interconnection between these properties exacerbates problems associated with underdeveloped interconnectivity (increased greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle congestion), and perpetuates a development style not encouraged by the County. PUD Traffic Commitment 5.5.0 is an ineffective commitment without additional support elsewhere in PUD exhibits. A corresponding reservation for interconnection/interconnection points does not appear in Exhibit B,Parcel B PUD Master Plan, or other PUD exhibits — making PUD materials internally inconsistent. Generally, the number of (interconnection) points constructed may be less than (but not more than) the number depicted on the Master Plan. The addition of arrow symbols to the Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan along the boundary between adjoining sites where interconnection appears feasible with labeling to indicate potential future vehicular interconnection/interconnection points, and between the two internal components with labeling to indicate potential future vehicular interconnection/interconnection points,would lend effective support to the commitment for these connections. This commitment is written in a manner that postpones any such decision until after the PUD is amended, and excludes the County from further involvement with ensuring vehicular interconnection/interconnection points are provided per this Policy. This needs to be revised in the PUD.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [As to walkable communities, the PUD provides for sidewalks located on only one side of single- loaded streets (with dwelling units on only one side of street) without providing for greater sidewalk width. Deviations from the LDC, VI.2 requests a formal deviation from the County's requirement for sidewalks on both sides of streets. LDC Deviation VI.2 allows sidewalks on only one side of single-loaded streets in Tract B (where future development occurs). It is common practice to provide wider sidewalks where they are constructed on only one side of a street. This is especially important where pedestrian traffic grows more dense as it is funneled to major route(s) and connection(s). Sidewalks constructed on both sides of the entry drive that provides the connection between Collier Boulevard and the internal loop street— optimizes pedestrian safety—and allows movement without mixing vehicular and non-vehicular this in this street segment where the greatest two-way traffic is found. This Deviation needs to be revised in order to not include the entry drive that provides the connection between Collier Boulevard and the internal loop street. Similar to the design shortcomings with vehicular interconnection discussed above,Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan, or other PUD materials do not provide for non-vehicular interconnection with abutting properties — even though the opportunities to interconnect PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 11 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -109- 5/12/2015 9.B. are present. Non-vehicular interconnection is possible and appears feasible with undeveloped land to the west. Land to the north of the PUD is developed as Forest Glen Golf& Country Club—where sidewalks, bikepaths and cartpaths are generally permitted; boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, hiking trails pathways and bridges are specifically permitted in the Golf Course, Open Space and Preserve areas that lie along the shared boundary. An `internal' interconnection with the adjoining, developed "Parcel A" component of the San Marino PUD appears to be feasible, AND is presently planned and approved. The current Master Plan for San Marino (Exhibit A), provides for interconnection (internally) between these 2 properties,and remains an important design element. As with the absence of vehicular interconnection discussed above, the lack of pedestrian and bicycle interconnection with abutting properties exacerbates problems associated with underdeveloped interconnectivity, and perpetuates a development style not encouraged by the County. PUD Traffic Commitment 5.5.0 is an ineffective commitment without additional support elsewhere in PUD exhibits. Corresponding reservations for pedestrian and bicycle interconnection/interconnection points do not appear in Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan, or other PUD exhibits — making PUB materials internally inconsistent. Generally, the number of (interconnection) points constructed may be less than (but not more than) the number depicted on the master plan. The addition of arrow symbols to Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan, along the boundary between adjoining sites with labeling to indicate potential future non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points, and between the two internal components with labeling to indicate potential future non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points, would lend effective support to the commitment for these connections. This commitment is written in a manner that postpones any such decision until after the PUD is amended, and excludes the County from further involvement with ensuring non- vehicular interconnection/interconnection points are provided per this Policy. This needs to be revised in the PUD. With regard to common open spaces, preserve areas and civic facilities, the PUD provides the sixty percent open space the LDC requires; permits community centers and clubhouses, various recreational uses and facilities, and open space uses and structures in residential areas. Designated preserve areas permit passive recreational areas, biking, hiking and nature trails,and boardwalks. With regard to a blend of densities and a range of housing prices and types, the application identifies multi-family residential units(with 600, 800 and 1,000 sq. ft. minimum floor areas for 1, 2 and 3 bedroom units, respectively) on developed Parcel "A". The application identifies single-family, two-family, townhouse and other multi-family residential units on undeveloped Parcel"B",but does not provide minimum floor areas for these unit types.] REVIEW OF PUD DOCUMENT Staff recommendations: 1. Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan: Add arrow symbols to the boundary between adjoining sites with labeling to indicate potential future vehicular and non-vehicular PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 12 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -110- 5/12/2015 9.B. interconnection/interconnection points, and to the internal boundary between the two components, with labeling to indicate potential future vehicular and non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points. 2. Development Commitments, subsection V.5.5.C: Modify language to involve County personnel, e.g. at lime of the first Site Development Plan, for providing, to the maximum extent feasible, vehicular and non-vehicular interconnectivity between adjoining sites and between the two internal components. This commitment will indicate that the developer shall provide to staff all correspondence between the parties so as to document efforts to interconnect. 3. Deviations from the LDC, subsection VI.2: Modify language to ensure sidewalks are constructed on both sides of the entry drive that provides the connection between Collier Boulevard and the internal loop street and,to provide for widened sidewalks where constructed on one side of single- loaded streets. Based upon the above analysis, the proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment may NOT be deemed consistent with the FLUE. Staff sent an email to the agent (please see attachment) requesting the above changes and the Applicant has not made the changes. However,this petition may be deemed consistent if the above requested changes are made. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this amendment within the 5 year planning period. Therefore, the subject application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). The proposed preserve is interconnected with adjoining preserves within Willow Run and Forest Glen of Naples PUDs which in turn are connected to native forested lands within the Belle Meade Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) Overlay and Picayune Strand State Forest to the east, to form an interconnected wildlife corridor. Listed and managed species documented in the area and within the San Marino PUD include Florida panther and Florida black bear. In the proposed preserve within the San Marino PUD are tropical hardwood hammocks and several species of listed epiphytic plants. Habitats known to be utilized by listed species or that serve as corridors for the movement of wildlife are the first priority in the preserve selection process pursuant to CCME Policy 6.1.1 (4). Preservation of hardwood hammocks is next in accordance with the Policy. The CCME Policy is provided below: (4) Selection of native vegetation to be retained as preserve areas shall reflect the following criteria in descending order ofpriority: a. Wetland or upland areas known to be utilized by listed species or that serve as corridors for the movement of wildlife shall be preserved and protected in order to facilitate the continued use of the site by listed species or the movement of wildlife through the site. This criterion shall be consistent with the requirements of Policy 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 of this element. b. Xeric Scrub, Dune and Strand, Hardwood Hammocks. PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 13 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -111- 5/12/2015 9.B. c. Onsite wetlands preserved pursuant to Policy 6.2.5 of this Element; d. Any upland habitat that serves as a buffer to a wetland area, as identified in (4)c. above. e. Dry Prairie, Pine Flatwoods, and f All other native habitats. GMP Conclusion: This PUD amendment petition is contingent upon approval of the companion GMPA petition CP-2014-2/PL20140000113 and the acceptance of Staff Recommendations 1 thru 3 listed on the previous pages. The GMPA petition is subject to possible changes through the Adoption public hearing process. GMPA Adoption hearings are tentatively scheduled for April 2, 2015 (CCPC) and May 12,2015 (BCC). ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Subsection 10.02.13 B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08 F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the bases for their recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support its action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Review." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document to address environmental concerns. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2,Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Transportation Review: Transportation staff has reviewed this petition and has found that the traffic analysis to be correct when analyzing projected background traffic. However, Staff has also analyzed the cumulative zoned units in this area (CR-951 Corridor between Davis Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road) and notes that there may be capacity/concurrency issues in the mid-range future. The capacity issue depends on the rate and actual density at which recently zoned developments in the immediate vicinity such as Hacienda Lakes DRI, (Development of Regional Impact) Willow Run PUD, and a few others)build-out. Utilities Review: Public Utilities staff has reviewed this petition and notes that it has sufficient capacity; other than the required commitments listed in the PUD Document, Public Utilities has no further comments or objections. Collier County Public Schools (CCPS) District Review: CCPS staff has reviewed the petition and has stated that there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development within the middle PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 14 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page-112- 5/12/2015 9.B. I and high school concurrency service areas that the development is located within. There is sufficient capacity within the adjacent currency service area for the elementary level. This finding is for planning and informational purposes only and does not constitute either a reservation of capacity or a finding of concurrency for the proposed project. At the time of site development plan or plat review, the development will be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity within the concurrency service area the development is located within and adjacent concurrency service areas such that the level of service standards are not exceeded. Zoning Services Review: FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses and intensity on the subject site, the compatibility analysis included a review of the subject proposal comparing it to surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location. As noted earlier in the staff report,the area to the north is developed as the Forest Glen of Naples PUD and an undeveloped agriculturally zoned tract. To the east and south is the proposed Willow Run PUD. To the west is Collier Boulevard. Zoning staff is of the opinion that this project will be compatible with and complementary to,the surrounding land uses. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking approval of seven deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are listed in Section VI. Deviations are a normal derivative of the PUD zoning process following the purpose and intent of the PUD zoning district as set forth in LDC Section 2.03.06 which says in part: It is further the purpose and intent of these PUD regulations to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design, and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control. PUDs . . . . may depart from the strict application of setback height, and minimum lot requirements of conventional zoning districts while maintaining minimum standards by which flexibility may be accomplished, and while protecting the public interest. . . . Deviation #1. seeks relief from LDC Section 2.03.07D.4.g, which requires TDR credits to be redeemed at a rate proportional to percentage of the PUD approved gross density that is derived through TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits, to allow for use of the PUD's base density prior to the redemption of TDR credits. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: This deviation is required due to existing conditions permitted via Ordinance 2000- 10, specifically the build-out of the base density (less 2 dwelling units) as part of the Aventine at Naples apartment complex. Planning Commitment 5.6.0 is included in PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 15 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -113- 5/12/2015 9.B. the PUD Document to address the future use of TDR credits in accordance with the LDC. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation,finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h,the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." The following deviations are applicable to Parcel"B" only: Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2, Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks to be constructed on both sides of local streets,to allow sidewalks on one side of the street only for streets with homes on one side of the street. One canopy tree (or canopy tree equivalent) shall be provided per 30 linear feet of sidewalk. Canopy trees located within 10 feet of the sidewalk may count towards a sidewalk canopy tree. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: Providing a sidewalk on both sides of a private street where homes are provided on a single side of the street is unnecessary in order to provide safe pedestrian access within the community. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: As previously stated in the GMPA Consistency review, Staff recommends sidewalks are constructed on both sides of the entry drive that provides the connection between Collier Boulevard and the internal loop street and to provide for widened sidewalks where constructed on one side of single-loaded streets. If this recommendation is adopted into the PUD document, than Staff could see no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved for the development. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation with the stipulation noted above,finding that,in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3,the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community, and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h,the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is`justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation#3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, Street System Requirements and Appendix B, Typical Street Sections and Right-of-Way Design Standards, which establishes a 60-foot wide local road to allow a minimum 40-foot wide local road. (See Exhibit E-1, Private Road Cross Section.) Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 16 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -114- 5/12/2015 9.B. The proposed 40 foot wide private road right-of-way is sufficiently wide enough to accommodate the required roadway improvements, including sidewalks. The internal project roads will be private and the standard public right-of-way is not necessary for internal traffic volumes. The reduced right-of-way widths will also provide a traffic calming effect within the community; thereby upholding public health, safety and welfare measures. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, which permits a maximum wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum wall height of 8 feet throughout the development, and a 12 foot tall wall, berm, or combination wall/berm along Collier Boulevard. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening and mitigation of noise pollution resulting from traffic along CR 951, a 6-lane divided arterial roadway. Approval of this deviation will serve to promote public health, safety and welfare, as well as enhance the aesthetic appeal of the proposed community and the Collier Boulevard corridor. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation for those only those areas described above, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3. the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation#5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5, Model Homes and Model Sales Centers, which permits a maximum of five (5) model homes, or a number corresponding to ten(10)percent of the total number of platted lots,whichever is less,per platted approved development prior to final plat approval. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of six (6) model homes per development tract, not to exceed 17 model homes within the overall RPUD. As part of the application material for every building permit for a model home, the developer shall provide PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 17 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page-115- 5/12/2015 9.B. documentation stating how many model homes are in existence so that the maximum of 17 model homes is not exceeded. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: 1 The RPUD proposes a variety of product types to accommodate various demographics and income levels. Due to the size of the project, the phased nature of the development, and the variety of dwelling types proposed, the Applicant is seeking an additional model home allowance to ensure the community is properly marketed to prospective buyers. The proposed deviation provides the County with the necessary safeguards to ensure an excess of model homes are not constructed Therefore, public health, safety and welfare will not be negatively impacted upon approval of this deviation. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Due to the size of the project, staff agrees that some allowance can be made to allow additional model units. Hacienda Lakes PUD, which was approved for over 1,700 residential units received deviation approval to allow up to 60 model homes. Bent Creek Preserve PUD received approval to allow 15 model homes for 450 dwelling units. With this project's proposed number of units (650), allowing a maximum of 17 models seems appropriate therefore; staff concurs with the applicant's assessment of the situation for this particular project. Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is accommodated. However, as noted in the deviation request, staff agrees that the developer should provide documentation at each development order or plat stating how many models are in existance to ensure the total of 17 is not exceeded. Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, fmding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is `justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, Temporary Signs, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height. The requested deviation is to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height. The temporary sign or banner shell be limited to 28 days per calendar year. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: Due to the property's substantial setback from Collier Boulevard as well as the high travel speeds along the roadway, the Applicant is seeking an increase to the allowable banner size to ensure visibility of this new community. The requested banner size is in accordance with deviations approved for similar residential projects throughout the County. PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 18 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -116- 5/12/2015 9.B. This same deviation was approved for Naples View PUD, which is an 11-acre, 66-unit residential project on Airport Pulling Road. Both Airport Pulling Road and Collier Boulevard s are busy arterial roadways, thus staff sees the need to temporarily bring attention to this new project. The temporary sign would need to conform to all other requirements for temporary uses and signage. Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation#7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.2, Development Standards for Signs within Residential Districts, which permits one (1) real estate sign per street frontage that is setback a minimum of 10' from any property line. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of two (2)real estate pole signs per street frontage along Collier Boulevard. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: The property line is set back approximately 100 feet from Collier Blvd a six (6) lane arterial roadway. Due to the setback and the high travel speeds along the road the Applicant is seeking an increase to the allowable number of real estate pole signs in order to ensure visibility of this new community. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff finds the requested number of signs is somewhat concerning. If approved, the requested deviation along with the 32 square foot sign listed in Deviation# 3 could constitute visual blight. Staff believes this deviation is not in keeping with the purpose and intent of the LDC to prevent ". . . .unsightly and detrimental signs that detract from the aesthetic appeal of the county and lead to economic decline and blight, by preventing signs from reaching such excessive size and numbers that they obscure one another to the detriment of the county. . . ." Staff therefore recommends denial of this deviation. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends DENIAL, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has not demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has not demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation#8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, Development Standards for Signs within Residential Districts, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development with a maximum height of 8' and total sign area of 64 s.f per sign. The requested deviation is to allow for PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 19 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -117- 5/12/2015 9.B. two (2) ground signs per project entrance with a maximum height of 10' and total sign area of 80 s.f.per sign face. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: The subject property is accessed via an arterial roadway with high travel speeds. Additionally, the property has a significant street setback due to the location of the canal along the property's frontage. Due to the setback and the property's location along an arterial road, the Applicant is seeking an increase to allowable entry signage height and area to ensure visibility of the community. This deviation request is similar to previous requests approved for large master planned communities within Collier County. The required setback from rights-of-way for entry sign will meet LDC standards, thereby ensuring public health, safety and welfare are protected. Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved, with the stipulation that these signs shall be limited to only the entrance on Collier Boulevard. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." FINDINGS OF FACT: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below. [Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold, non-italicized font]: PUD Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation,the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria" (Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed uses are compatible with the approved uses and existing development in the area. In addition, the proposed property development regulations provide adequate assurances that the proposed project will be suitable to the type and pattern of development in the area. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 20 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -118- 5/12/2015 9.B. relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application,which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to obtain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion and the zoning analysis of this staff report. Based on those staff analyses, planning zoning staff is of the opinion that this petition may be found consistent with the Future Land Use Element contingent upon Board approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment, Petition GMPA- PL2014-0000113,to amend the Subdistrict language. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis Section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed uses, development standards and developer commitments will help ensure that this project is compatible with the surrounding area. S. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project as noted in the GMP FLUE and Transportation Element consistency review. In addition, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 21 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -119- 5/12/2015 9.B. 1 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The petitioner is seeking several deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06.A). This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff believes the deviations can be supported, some with stipulations, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report for a more extensive examination of the deviations. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The zoning analysis provides an in-depth review of the proposed amendment. Staff is of the opinion that the project as proposed is consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the project to be compatible with neighborhood development. Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed PUDZ application consistent with the Future Land Use Element contingent upon the previously stated Staff recommendations 1 thru 3 listed in the GMP Consistency Review and Board approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment, Petition GMPA-PL2014-113, to adopt the Subdistrict language. The petition can be deemed consistent with the CCME and the Transportation Element. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP contingent upon Board approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment. 2. The existing land use pattern; Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed it in the zoning services review. Staff believes the proposed rezoning is appropriate given the existing land use pattern, and development restrictions included in the PUD Ordinance. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; The proposed PUD rezone would not create an isolated zoning district. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 22 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -120- 5/12/2015 9.B. conditions on the property proposed for change. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed district boundaries are logically drawn since the zoning boundary mirrors the existing property boundary for the contract purchaser. S. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary,per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes, and the proposed rezoning is being requested in concert with a request to amend the GMP. 6. Whether the proposed change will adverselyinfluence living conditions in the neighborhood; Staff is of the opinion that the proposed change, subject to the proposed list of uses and property development regulations and the proposed Development Commitments detailed in Section V, is consistent with the County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element(FLUE)of the GMP. Therefore,the proposed change should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time subject to the Transportation Commitments contained in Section V of the RPUD ordinance. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; The proposed change should not create drainage or surface water problems because the LDC specifically addresses prerequisite development standards that are designed to reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. Additionally, the LDC and GMP have other specific regulations in place that will ensure review for drainage on new developments. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; If this petition were approved, any subsequent development would need to comply with the applicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the PUD document. This project's property development regulations provide adequate setbacks and distances between structures; therefore the project should not significantly reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results,which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 23 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -121- 5/12/2015 9.B. marketed in a manner comparable to the surrounding developments. 1 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; With the exception of an undeveloped property located in the northwest corner of the subject site, properties adjacent to the subject site are developed and undeveloped PUDs with similar uses. Rezoning this property to a PUD district seems appropriate. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; If the proposed companion GMPA is approved, then the proposed development will comply with the Growth Management Plan which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning designations; however, the petitioner is seeking this amendment in compliance with LDC provisions for such action. The petition can be evaluated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the proposed amendment meets the intent of the PUD district, and further, believes the public interest will be maintained. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County; As noted previously, the proposed rezone boundary follows the existing property ownership boundary. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, staff has evaluated the appropriateness of this particular zoning petition. There are other sites in Collier County that would allow the proposed uses; however the proposed uses are also appropriate at this location as well. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 24 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -122- 5/12/2015 9.B. proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require considerable site alteration and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan or platting approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities,except as it may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD document. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The agents conducted a duly noticed NIM on October 21,2014. Please see attached copy of notes. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office reviewed the staff report for this petition on March 16, 2015. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Services staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PUDA-PL20140000100 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval subject to the approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment,Petition GMPA-PL2014-113, and subject to the following stipulations: Staff recommendations: 1. Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan: Add arrow symbols to the boundary between adjoining sites with labeling to indicate potential future vehicular and non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points, and to the internal boundary between the two components, with labeling to indicate potential future vehicular and non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points. PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 25 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -123- 5/12/2015 9.B. 2. Development Commitments, subsection V.5.5.C: Modify language to involve County personnel, e.g. at time of the first Site Development Plan, for providing, to the maximum extent feasible, vehicular and non-vehicular interconnectivity between adjoining sites and between the two internal components. This commitment will indicate that the developer shall provide to staff all correspondence between the parties so as to document efforts to interconnect. 3. Deviations from the LDC, subsection VI.2: Modify language to ensure sidewalks are constructed on both sides of the entry drive that provides the connection between Collier Boulevard and the internal loop street and, to provide for widened sidewalks where constructed on one side of single-loaded streets. 4. Denial of Deviation#7 which requests an additional real estate sign. Attachments: A. Proposed PUD Ordinance B. Ordinance Number 2000-10 C. Density Map D. Email request/response E. NIM Synopsis PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 26 of 27 March 17,2015 Packet Page -124- 5/12/2015 9.B. PREPARED BY: i r , g iii , yv4,76% 1'0, 205 A Y G I H, CP,PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE GROWTH N. EMENT DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: Aff , � 3. 10 I RAYIVIa w. :ELLOWS.ZONING MANAGER DATE ORO T MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 27',A4P42 3' 4iIKE BOSI,AICP,DIRECTOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: ,7 3 NIC1'C S NGUID ,ADMINISTRATOR DAT1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION Attachment: NIM transcript 1-his petition will has been tentatively scheduled for the May l 2,2015 BCC hearing. PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 26 of 26 March 10,2015 Packet Page -125- Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h,the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is"justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." The following deviations are applicable to Parcel"B" only: Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2, Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks to be constructed on both sides of local streets, to allow sidewalks on one side of the street only for streets with homes on one side of the street. One canopy tree (or canopy tree equivalent) shall be provided per 30 linear feet of sidewalk. Canopy trees located within 10 feet of the sidewalk may count towards a sidewalk canopy tree. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: Providing a sidewalk on both sides of a private street where homes are provided on a single side of the street is unnecessary in order to provide safe pedestrian access within the community. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: As previously stated in the GMPA Consistency review, Staff recommends sidewalks are constructed on both sides of the entry drive that provides the connection between Collier Boulevard and the internal loop street and to provide for widened sidewalks where constructed on one side of single-loaded streets. If this recommendation is adopted into the PUD document, than Staff could see no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved for the development. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation with the stipulation noted above,finding that,in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3,the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h,the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is"justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." The petitioner associated with PDI-PL20160000263 is requesting to amend this deviation. The new staff report provides an updated analysis and recommendation. Deviation#3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, Street System Requirements and Appendix B, Typical Street Sections and Right-of-Way Design Standards, which establishes a 60-foot wide local road to allow a minimum 40-foot wide local road. (See Exhibit E-1, Private Road Cross Section.) Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 16 of 27 March 17,2015 The proposed 40 foot wide private road right-of-way is sufficiently wide enough to accommodate the required roadway improvements, including sidewalks. The internal project roads will be private and the standard public right-of-way is not necessary for internal traffic volumes. The reduced right-of-way widths will also provide a traffic calming effect within the community; thereby upholding public health, safety and welfare measures. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is"justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation#4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C,Fences and Walls,which permits a maximum wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum wall height of 8 feet throughout the development, and a 12 foot tall wall, berm, or combination wall/berm along Collier Boulevard. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening and mitigation of noise pollution resulting from traffic along CR 951, a 6-lane divided arterial roadway. Approval of this deviation will serve to promote public health, safety and welfare, as well as enhance the aesthetic appeal of the proposed community and the Collier Boulevard corridor. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation for those only those areas described above,finding that,in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3,the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health,safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h,the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." The petitioner associated with PDI-PL20160000263 is requesting to amend this deviation. The new staff report provides an updated analysis and recommendation. Deviation#5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5, Model Homes and Model Sales Centers, which permits a maximum of five (5) model homes, or a number corresponding to ten(10)percent of the total number of platted lots,whichever is less,per platted approved development prior to final plat approval. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of six (6) model homes per development tract, not to exceed 17 model homes within the overall RPUD. As part of the PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 17 of 27 March 17,2015 required to obtain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion and the zoning analysis of this staff report. Based on those staff analyses,planning zoning staff is of the opinion that this petition may be found consistent with the Future Land Use Element contingent upon Board approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment,Petition GMPA-PL2014-0000113, to amend the Subdistrict language. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis Section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed uses,development standards and developer commitments will help ensure that this project is compatible with the surrounding area. S. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project as noted in the GMP FLUE and Transportation Element consistency review. In addition,the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. An updated GMP FLUE, Transportation, and Environmental review that addresses the proposed changes is provided in the staff report associated with PDI-PL20160000263. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 21 of 27 March 17,2015 The petitioner is seeking several deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts(LDC Section 2.03.06.A). This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff believes the deviations can be supported, some with stipulations, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report for a more extensive examination of the deviations. An updated GMP FLUE, Transportation, and Environmental review that addresses the proposed changes is provided in the staff report associated with PDI-PL20160000263. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The zoning analysis provides an in-depth review of the proposed amendment. Staff is of the opinion that the project as proposed is consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the project to be compatible with neighborhood development. Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed PUDZ application consistent with the Future Land Use Element contingent upon the previously stated Staff recommendations 1 thru 3 listed in the GMP Consistency Review and Board approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment, Petition GMPA-PL2014-113, to adopt the Subdistrict language. The petition can be deemed consistent with the CCME and the Transportation Element. Therefore,staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP contingent upon Board approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment. An updated GMP FLUE, Transportation, and Environmental review that addresses the proposed changes is provided in the staff report associated with PDI-PL20160000263. 2. The existing land use pattern; Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the"Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed it in the zoning services review. Staff believes the proposed rezoning is appropriate given the existing land use pattern, and development restrictions included in the PUD Ordinance. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; The proposed PUD rezone would not create an isolated zoning district. PUDA-PL20140000100: SAN MARINO RPUD Page 22 of 27 March 17,2015 HEX 6-23-2016 DR-PL20150002617 Ann P. Jennejohn PORSCHE OF NAPLES From: BeasleyRachel <RachelBeasley@colliergov.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:53 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: Smith, Daniel; Ann P.Jennejohn; Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael; Kendall, Marcia; Lang, Ashley; Neet, Virginia; Rodriguez,Wanda Subject: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Attachments: Porsche of Naples Request for Advertisement.docx; Signed Page.pdf; Porsche of Naples 2x3 Map.pdf Good morning, Please advertise the Porsche of Naples DR petition attachments for the June 23, 2016, HEX hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department-Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 Coder County Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:28 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: BeasleyRachel; Smith, Daniel; Ashton, Heidi; Stone, Scott Subject: re: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Attachments: Porsche of Naples Request for Advertisement.docx; Signed Page.pdf; Porsche of Naples 2x3 Map.pdf Title is correct, OK to proceed. Heidi & Scott: this item was added to the 6/23 HEX agenda after our review of the titles for that meeting. Wanda Rodriguez, .ACP .Advanced Certified Paralegal- Office of the County.Attorney (239)252-8400 From: BeasleyRachel Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:53 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: SmithDaniel; Ann P. Jennejohn; BellowsRay; BosiMichael; KendallMarcia; LangAshley; NeetVirginia; RodriguezWanda Subject: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Good morning, Please advertise the Porsche of Naples DR petition attachments for the June 23, 2016, HEX hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department— Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 Corer Comity Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 May 24, 2016 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on June 3 2016. and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Daniel Smith, Planner in the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION:ZONING [Zoning Services Section) FUND&COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number: 076397 J.,1" tc) q-)e_A.y Authorized Designee signature for HEX Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,June 23, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples Fl 34104,to consider: PETITION DR-PL20150002617 —Petitioner, TT of Naples, Inc. requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks nine total deviations, including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16, relating to standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, relating to plant material standards for required landscaping; and five deviations from LDC Section 5.05.08, relating to architectural design standards for blank walls, roof treatments, building colors and materials, and parking structures, for a proposed Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.15+ acres, located on the north side of Davis Blvd.,just west of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101,Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida N.r dY y �Y m Airport Pulling RD S O r xf 0 p Z '1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:40 AM To: 'BeasleyRachel': Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Hi Rachel, I'll send proof for Porsche of Naples and the Walvvmart petition, scheduled for June 23rd (HEX) Hearings, for staff's review and final approval as soon as I receive thew, from NDN. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 From: BeasleyRachel [mailto:RachelBeasley@colliergov.net] Sent:Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:53 AM To: Minutes and Records<MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com> Cc:Smith, Daniel<DanielSmith@colliergov.net>; Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com>; Bellows, Ray <RayBellows@colliergov.net>; Bosi, Michael<MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; Kendall, Marcia <MarciaKendall@colliergov.net>; Lang, Ashley<ashleylang@colliergov.net>; Neet,Virginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; Rodriguez, Wanda <WandaRodriguez@colliergov.net> Subject: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Good morning, Please advertise the Porsche of Naples DR petition attachments for the June 23, 2016, HEX hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department-Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 ler CoHrity Ann P. Jennejohn From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:40 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: BeasleyRachel; Smith, Daniel;Ashton, Heidi; Stone, Scott Subject: RE: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Attachments: Porsche DR revised title Scott has one minor correction to the title for the ad. See attached. Wanda Rodriguez, MCP .Advanced Certified Paralegal Office of the County.Attorney (239)252-8400 From: RodriguezWanda Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:28 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: BeasleyRachel; SmithDaniel; AshtonHeidi; StoneScott Subject: re: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Title is correct, OK to proceed. Heidi & Scott: this item was added to the 6/23 HEX agenda after our review of the titles for that meeting. Wanda Rodriguez, ACP Advanced Certified Paralegal- Office aralegalOffice of the County.Attorney (239)252-8400 From: BeasleyRachel Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:53 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: SmithDaniel; Ann P. Jennejohn; BellowsRay; BosiMichael; KendallMarcia; LangAshley; NeetVirginia; RodriguezWanda Subject: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Good morning, Please advertise the Porsche of Naples DR petition attachments for the June 23, 2016, HEX hearing. Sincerely, 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Stone, Scott Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:37 AM To: Smith, Daniel Cc: Rodriguez, Wanda;Ashton, Heidi; Crotteau, Kathynell Subject: Porsche DR revised title Attachments: Title 5 24 16.doc Dan, I just realized that there was a minor grammatical error in the title that I sent you last week.The comma in front of"one deviation" should be a semi-colon. I highlighted the change below. Is it too late to update the title for your ad? PETITION DR-P120150002617 — Petitioner, TT of Naples, Inc. requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks nine total deviations, including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16, relating to standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area; one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, relating to plant material standards for required landscaping; and five deviations from LDC Section 5.05.08, relating to architectural design standards for blank walls, roof treatments, building colors and materials, and parking structures, for a proposed Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.15± acres, located on the north side of Davis Blvd.,just west of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 2,Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Scott A.Stone Assistant County Attorney Collier County Attorney's Office (239) 252-5740 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 4 4 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn on behalf of Minutes and Records Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:14 AM To: Rodriguez, Wanda; Stone, Scott Subject: RE: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Thank you for the info. I've made that small change. Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment 13oard Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 From: Rodriguez,Wanda Sent:Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:40 AM To: Minutes and Records<MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com> Cc: BeasleyRachel <RachelBeasley@colliergov.net>; Smith, Daniel<DanielSmith@colliergov.net>; Ashton, Heidi <HeidiAshton@colliergov.net>; Stone, Scott<ScottStone@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Scott has one minor correction to the title for the ad. See attached. Wanda Rodriguez, ..ACT .Advanced Certified Paralegal- Office of the County.Attorney (239)252-8400 I From: RodriguezWanda Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:28 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: BeasleyRachel; SmithDaniel; AshtonHeidi; StoneScott Subject: re: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Title is correct, OK to proceed. Heidi & Scott: this item was added to the 6/23 HEX agenda after our review of the titles for that meeting. 1 NDN Account #076397 Corporate Account #507876 May 25, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples News Media 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 Re: DR-PL20150002617 Display Notice (w/MAP) Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice (w/Map) Friday, June 3, 2016 and send the Affidavit of Publication to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500168030 May 25, 2016 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on June 3, 2016, and send proof of publication to the Board Minutes and Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 401, Naples, Florida 34112. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section} PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500168030 Account Number: NDN 076397/507876 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,June 23, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples FL 34104, to consider: PETITION DR-PL20150002617 —Petitioner, TT of Naples, Inc. requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks nine total deviations, including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16, relating to standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area; one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, relating to plant material standards for required landscaping; and five deviations from LDC Section 5.05.08, relating to architectural design standards for blank walls, roof treatments, building colors and materials, and parking structures, for a proposed Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.15± acres, located on the north side of Davis Blvd.,just west of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101,Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida • v co • 6 Airport Pulling RD S m O Z • N Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:08 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: DR-PL20150002617 Display (w/MAP) Attachments: DR-PL20150002617.doc; DR-PL20150002617.doc; DR-PL20150002617.pdf Good Morning, Please advertise the attached (w/MAP) ovt Friday, June 3, 201-6. Thank you! Ivonne, a new PD Number (45001-68030) has been assigned to this account. It's on my memo, but I thought I'd mention it, also. Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 2.361-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 4 4 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Gori,Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 1:27 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: RE: DR-PL20150002617 Display (w/MAP) Confirmed receipt. Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist usArcaoAr t1l�r1�FtTgI ;11L1 NETWORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gorignaplesnews.corn NaplesNews.corn From:Ann P.Jennejohn [mailto:Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:08 AM To: Legals NDN <legals@naplesnews.com> Subject: DR-PL20150002617 Display(w/MAP) Good Morvtivtg, Please advertise the attached (w/MAP) ov. Friday, June 3, 2016. Thank you! Ivonne, a new PO Number (4500168030) has been assigned to this account. It's on my memo, but I thought I'd mention it, also. Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment l3oard Collier County Hoard Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Gori,Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 10:08 AM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: Proof 1110281 Attachments: NDNB1110281.pdf Please see attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist NETWORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 4 1 11111 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider: PETITION DR-PL20150002617 — Petitioner, TT of Naples, Inc. requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks nine total deviations, including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16, relating to standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area; one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, relating to plant material standards for required landscaping; and five deviations from LDC Section 5.05.08, relating to architectural design standards for blank walls, roof treatments, building colors and materials, and parking structures, for a proposed Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.15± acres, located on the north side of Davis Blvd.,just west of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 2,Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. 1 0 / c PROJECT ! 1 a LOCATION I . . , Davis BLVD [ i ! I W4-r All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252- 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.1110281 June 3.2016 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 11:17 AM To: wanda.rodriguez@colliergov.net; BeasleyRachel; Stone, Scott Subject: Petition DR-PL20150002617 (Porsche)June 23, 2016 HEX Attachments: NDNB1110281.pdf Good Morning, The legal advertisement for Petition DR-PL20150002617 (Porsche) that will be advertised Friday, June 3rd for a June 23rd HEX Hearing is attached for your review and approval. Please let wte know whether there are arty necessary changes or if I can, give NPN the "O.K." for publication at your earliest convenience. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn Board Minutes & Records Department Frowt: Gori, Ivonne [ivonne.gori@naplesnews.cowt] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 201-6 10:07 AM To: An P. Jennejohn Subject: Proof 1110281- Please see attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist [cid:i wtage001.png@O1 011373 6.6 8 F3 F3301 Office: 23 9.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@vtapl esnews.cowt<wtai lto:I vonne.gori@napl esnews.cowt> NaplesNews.cowt 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Stone, Scott Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:18 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Cc: BeasleyRachel; Rodriguez,Wanda; Klatzkow, Jeff Subject: RE: Petition DR-PL20150002617 (Porsche) June 23, 2016 HEX Title looks good, thanks! Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney Collier County Attorney's Office (239) 252-5740 Original Message From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 11:17 AM To: wand a.rodriguez@colliergov.net; BeasleyRachel; StoneScott Subject: Petition PR-PL2015000261-7 (Porsche) June 23, 2016 HEX Good Morning, The legal advertisement For Petition PR-PL2O150002617 (Porsche) that will be advertised Friday, June 3rd For a June 23rd HEX Hearing is attached For your review and approval. Please let me know whether there are any necessary changes or if I can give NDN the "O.K." for publication at your earliest convenience. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn Board Minutes & Records Department From: Gori, Ivonne [ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 10:07 AM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Subject: Proof 1110281 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 9:15 AM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: RE: Porsche Petition DR-PL20150002617 (June 23, 2016 HEX) Thanks for forwarding, this one looks fine. Wanda Rodriguez, ACP Advanced Certified Paralegal Office of the County Attorney (239) .252-8400 Original Message Frowt: Ann P. Jennejohn [vvtailto:Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.cowt] Sent: Friday, May 2.7, 2O1- 8:25 AM To: RodriguezWanda Subject: Porsche Petition DR-PL2O15OOO2'17 (June 23, 2Oi- HEX) The legal notice for the Porsche petition, that will be advertised June 3rd for a June 23rd HEX Hearing is attached for your review and approval. Please look it over at your earliest convenience. Thank you again, Ann Jennejohn Board Minutes & Records Department Frown: Gori, Ivonne [ivonne.gori@naplesnews.cowt] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 201-6 1-0:07 AM To: Ann P. Jennejohn 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:38 PM To: Gori, Ivonne Subject: RE: Proof 1110281 Attachments: image001.png Looks great Ivonne! Please publish the notice next Friday, June 3rd. Thanks again, Ann Jennejohn Hoard Minutes & Records Department From: Gori, Ivonne [ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2.016 10:07 AM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Subject: Proof 1110281 Please see attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist [cid:image001.png@01D113736.68F3F3301 Office: 23 9.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com<mailto:Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> NaplesNews.com 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS (( Friday,June 3,2016 (( 15A PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104,to consider: PETITION DR-PL20150002617 - Petitioner, TT of Naples, Inc. requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks nine total deviations, including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16, relating to standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area; one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, relating to plant material standards for required landscaping; and five deviations from LDC Section 5.05.08, relating to architectural design standards for blank walls, roof treatments, building colors and materials, and parking structures, for a proposed Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.15± acres, located on the north side of Davis Blvd.,just west of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 2,Township 50 South, Range 25 East,Collier County, Florida. c a am PROJECT d LOCATION o , 0 Davis BLVD •T aia �,T '+ All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252- 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida 1 No.1110281 i,ire 3.2016 ?'apIrø Bat Lij sDrw NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# COLLIER COUNTY HEX 1110281 PUBLIC HEARING 45-168030 Pub Dates June 3,2016 �bffi-Gp 6'"." (Sign ure of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me 1 , ,V, !Y, IVONNE GORI ' This June 08, 16 1 �, Notary Public-State of Florba �!� •= Commission #�FF 900870 ?�` r My Comm.Expires Jul 16.20194 •-Y 1 IINN Wwid through National NASL ary \I tel/ (Signatur of affiant) ' 4 NAPLES DAILY NEWS E Friday,June 3,2016 a 15A • Presidential campaign 2016 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE In pursuit of GOP unity,Ryan NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing • says he'll vote for Trump Examiner(HE)t)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2018,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room,at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Room 609/610,Naples FL 34104,to • By Steve Peoples consider: and Scott Bauer • Associated Ness PETITION DR-PL20150002617-Petitioner,TT of Naples,Inc.requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F end seeks nine IANE$WLLE,Wis.-House total deviations,including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16,relating to X Speaker Paul Ryan en- standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering In the Bayshore CD• dorsad Donald Trump's Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area;one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, I Z bid for president Thurs- ad.T 11 - 1‘4u relating to plant material standards for required landscaping;and five deviations from day,bringing an end to LDC Section 5.05.08,relating to architectural design standards for blank walls,root the extraordinary public r.Al r g andparking proposed r '`_, treatments,building colors and materials, rkln structures,for a = < split between the GOP's Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.150 acres,located on the north side of W presumptive White House Davis Blvd.,just west of Airport-Pulling Road,in Section 2,Township 50 South,Range nominee and the nation's 25 East,Collier County,Florida. O 2 top Republican in office. 0 — "I had friends wishing o L V I wouldn't support him. ..M`"1°""'s o Q — I had friends wishing I House Speaker Paul Ryan,8-Wis.,talks Thursday with The /S/ rc l Lf) m would"Ryan said in an Associated Press in Janesville,Wis. / PROJECT Q exclusive interview with IDN Q D The Associated Press."I Paul Ryan,"Trump wrote. struggled to identify a vi- 0-Z < d really didn't feel any pies- "We will both be working able alternative,many be- 7 enr sure,other than my goal very hard to Make Ameri- lieved it was only a matter Owls BLVD is to make sure that were ca Great Again!" of time before Ryan fell in unified so that we're at full There are Winsome GOP line.The endorsement,he •• strength in the fall so we leaders who say they won't said,was not the product can win the election." support Trump,including of any deal with the bit- Ryan's announcement, 2012 Republican presiden- lionaire developer,but a e N made in a newspaper col- tial nominee Mitt Romney, decision based on"an un- - C man published in his Wis- who tapped Ryan as his derstanding of our mutual- 0 consin hometown,marks ruining mate four years ly agreed upon principles." NJ a significant step for a Re- ago.A day earlier,Romney Ryan said he specifically All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in publican Pato rty trying d support wanted to go over rump's come together of a sibthird-party hid-p yandi approach to executive pow- presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent pert of the record. general election matchupstead of the presumptive er judicial appointments • (53 C against likely Democratic Republican nominee. andldsposition on abortion Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be N o_ O nominee Hillary Clinton. Ryan himself acknowl- "Those conversations reviewed at the CoNier County Growth Management Department,Zoning Division, � U Q And Ryan made clear he edged he continues to have took some time,"he said, Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL had Clinton on his mind concerns Trumps combat- adding:"I feel much more (1) 0 0 u when he decided to join the ive style but said after a se- comfortable that he's lathe The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person > C C U ranks of Republicans who ries of conversations with same page with us.Most decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with � i) N 0ll have slowly come aeoundto Trump,he's confident he importantly,it is obvious respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of backing Trump,the beasts and the House Republicans that Hillary Clinton is not." that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record < < 0 billionaire few expected to he leads as speaker will be Ryan ended aweekslong of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon emerge as the party's nomi- able to work with him as standoff with Trump min- which the appeal a to be based. nee when the campaign be- president on their agenda. uses before the interview gan in earnest last year. "We obviously have a by outlining his support If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to "This to me is about different kind of style and for the New York billion- participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at.no cost to you,to the provision of saving the country and tone.That's very clear. erem a column published certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division preventing a third progres- Anyone who knows any- online by The Janesville located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,Florida 34112-5356,(239)252- sive,liberal onpreswhich is thing about usknows that," Gazette. 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. C what a Clinton presidency Ryan said."But what really, He had shocked the po- woulddo,"Ryan said. ultimately matters is how Utica'world last month by Mark Strain Trump celebrated the best can we make sure refusing to endorse Trump 10 endorsement on his favor- these principles and poli- once the real estate mogul Chi , ef Hearing Examiner N ite venue,Twitter. cies get enacted in 2017." became the last major Re- Collier County,Florida "So great to have the en- As the GOP's so-called publican presidential con- T." dorsement and support of "Never Trump"movement tender still in the race. Ns 1110261. Juno 5 2015 X • N PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE o a U Q NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is herebyby County t z M Zgivan thatapublic hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Notice is hereby given that public hearing wily be held the Collier Coun Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room,at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Room 609/610,Naples FL 34104,to Meeting Room,at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Room 609/610,Naples,FL 34104,to consider: consider: (I) PETITION DR-PL20130002268-Petitioner,Wal-Mart Stores East,LP,requests PETIDON NO.PDI-PL20160000263-SD San Marino,LLC requests an insubstantial approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and change to Ordinance No.2000-10,as amended,the San Marino Planned Unit seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6,relating to buffer and screening standard Development,to add a traffic development commitment relating to temporary requirements;from LDC Section 4.06.05C.,relating to foundation planting requirements Calong retail building facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.2,relating to building design construction access for Parcel 8,to amend a traffic development commitment to N reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel Bto amend amend a deviation N Z feature requirements for primary facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.4,relating to CI variation in massing requirements for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B,to amend a C �' building area;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.5,relating to building design treatment deviation to allow fora 12-foot tall fence,wall or been along the shared boundary with 1 requirements for all building facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8,relating to detail Willow Run PUD to the south,and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect -E >- feature requirements for blank wall areas on a building;from LDC Section 5.05.08 the location of the temporary and permanent access points,and the reconfigured Z a) QJ 0 C.i0.relating to roof edge and parapet treatment requirements for buildings larger roadways,lakes and residential areas,for the property located on the east side of -0 NN O than 5,000 square feet in gross building area;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.12,relating Collier Boulevard,approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard,in Section 11, < C CO U to entryway/customer entrance treatment requirements for single tenant buildings; Township 50 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida,consisting of 2350 acres. from LDC Section 5.05.08 D.3.relating to design standard requirements for mercantile buildings;from LDC Section 5.05.08 E.3,relating to site design standard requirements �J �' ."'� -- , for service function areas and facilities,fora Wal-Mart expansion redevelopment a... project consisting of 17.21s acres of land,located on the north side of Tamiami Trail 4" East(U.S.41),approximately 1,000 feet east of Airport-Pulling Road,in Section 12, ``r -�¢ r § Township 50 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida 0 Y I e e� ,1-1 v j i 5. .'",'!"-a 1:=,g,",.. — inn I iso dse. PROJECT /�LOCATION 12 a'"`' PROJECT 5.e " - au �� LOCATION „ /ems , µ is E I ,.......0_, "a.��,' Y J Imwµwvn vrwa'R areis 0 All interested parties invited to appear and be heard. AN materials used in 0 All interested parties are Invited to appear and be heard. All materials treed in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department,Zoning Division, t reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department,Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL. Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Dr'Ne,Naples,FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person NO The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Heating Examiner with respect to any matte considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon 1 �styAwhich the appeal is to be based. which the appeal is to be based. + ► tit 0 If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to if you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to //tt�� participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of Z Gy certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,Florida 34112-5356,(239)252- located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,Florida 341125356,(239)252- ree C 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County,Florida Collier County,Florida No-tttvee3 June 3 Mite 140.1112182 June 5.2016 CU OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Minutes & Records, Clerk of Courts FROM: Wanda Rodriguez,ACP DATE: July 8, 2016 RE: Hearing Examiner Decision(s) from June 23, 2016. Attached is a signed HEX decision from the Hearing Examiner hearing on June 23, 2016. Attachment: HEX No. 2016—23 [05-00A-01253/813782/1]744 HEX NO. 2016—23 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION DR-PL20150002617 —Petitioner, TT of Naples, Inc. requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks nine total deviations, including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16, relating to standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area; one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, relating to plant material standards for required landscaping; and five deviations from LDC Section 5.05.08, relating to architectural design standards for blank walls, roof treatments, building colors and materials, and parking structures, for a proposed Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.15± acres, located on the north side of Davis Blvd., just west of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. DATE OF HEARING: June 23, 2016 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of deviations 1, 6, & 8; denial of deviations 2, 3, 4, 5, & 7. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant and staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Section 10.02.03.F.7 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition should be approved. ANALYSIS: See Exhibit A. DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition Number DR-PL20150002617, filed by Kristina M. Johnson of J.R. Evans Engineering representing TT of Naples, Inc., for a site plan with deviations for redevelopment for property located at 3147 Davis Boulevard and further described in Exhibit"C", as follows: 1. A deviation from LDC Section 5.05.08.C.8.b. which states that control or expansion joints are considered blank wall area unless used as a decorative pattern and spaced at 120 square feet per panel or less, to instead allow the Porsche "floating cap" decorative aluminum panel to be 144 square feet; and 2. A deviation from LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.c.ii., which requires that commercial building elevations along secondary street frontages in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area provide 25% glazing, to instead allow 17% glazing for the building elevation along Terrace Boulevard to the North; and [16-CPS-01510/1265618/1]25 Page 1 of 3 3. A deviation from LDC Section 5.05.08.C.10.b.i which requires that buildings larger than 5,000 square foot gross building area provide a minimum of two roof-edge or parapet line changes, at least one of such changes shall be provided on primary façade, and additional roof-edge or parapet line changes must be provided for every 100 linear feet of the facade length, to instead allow a 190 linear foot roof line with no parapet line changes along the south façade facing Davis Boulevard; and 4. A deviation from LDC Section 5.05.08.C.13.b.i which states the use of colors or materials above level 8 saturation is limited to no more than 10% of a façade, to instead allow colors above a level 8 saturation on 66% of the north façade facing Terrace Avenue, and 32% of the east façade facing the Combs commercial property, and 64% of the west facade that facing the proposed 2-story parking garage; and 5. A deviation from LDC Section 5.05.08.C.13.c.i. which limits corrugated or metal panels to no more than 33% of the façade area, to instead allow 68% on the south façade facing Davis Boulevard, 69% on the east façade, 70% on the north façade facing Terrace Avenue, and 37% on the west façade; and 6. A deviation from LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii. which states that windows along the first floor building elevation on commercial buildings within the Bayshore Triangle Redevelopment Area shall be located between 2 and 7 feet above sidewalk grade, to instead allow windows to be located between 0 and 8 feet above sidewalk grade; and 7. A deviation from LDC Section 5.05.08.D.8.e. which states that for Parking Structures, the facade area within 42 inches above each floor/deck shall not be open more than 50 percent, except at openings for vehicle or pedestrian access, to instead allow the south facade of the parking structure facing Davis Boulevard to have a cable railing that will be open for 100 percent of the façade length; and 8. A deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a. which states that for plant materials used to meet landscaping requirements, Roystonea (aka Royal Palms) shall count one palm for one canopy tree and that palms may be substituted for up to 30 percent of required canopy trees with the exception that no more than 30-percent of canopy trees may be substituted by palms within each individual Type `D' road right-of-way landscape buffer, to instead allow Royal Palms as a substitution for 100% of the required canopy trees within the Davis Boulevard Type `D' road right-of-way buffer. These deviations are shown in the Deviations Detail attached as Exhibit "B," and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below. This decision does not constitute approval of the site plan. The following deviation (which was originally listed as Deviation 8 in the Staff Report) requested by the applicant was determined by staff to be unnecessary, and therefore is not included nor made part of this decision: 8. A deviation from LDC Section 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b.1 which states that the landscape buffer along road rights-of-way shall be a minimum 10-foot wide Type D buffer, to instead allow a minimum 6.5-foot wide Type D buffer for 76 linear feet along Terrace Avenue. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A—Analysis by Hearing Examiner Exhibit B —Deviations Detail Exhibit C—Legal Description Exhibit D—Illustrations of Project Enhancements and Façades [16-CPS-01510/1265618/1]25 Page 2 of 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit C. CONDITIONS: 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. Deviation No. 4 shall only apply so long as the use of this facility and site remain a Porsche dealership. DISCLAIMER: Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners or the Board of Zoning Appeals, as appropriate. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. 7 C1 1P149 Date Mar Strain, Hearing Examiner Approvbe as to fo ' and legality: „1„4„ Scott A Stone Assistant County Attorney [16-CPS-01510/1265618/1]25 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit A ANALYSIS BY HEARING EXAMINER No members of the public attended this meeting in opposition and no written objections were received by staff. Staff reported that one neighboring business owner to the north expressed concern over some of the deviations but did not provide any written objection. The Bayshore- Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Committee expressed support for this application. Tax records indicate this parcel was developed in 1964 with an office and warehouse building that remain today. Staff acknowledged the existing building and site are non-conforming. This project is within the Bayshore-Gateway Triangle overlay, which provides for additional criteria for development and architectural standards. The applicant is proposing a Porsche car dealership. Porsche is an established corporate brand and maintains a standard visual quality at retail dealership locations worldwide. According to the applicant, the architectural style is indicative of"Modern International" which is an acceptable architectural style per the LDC (section 5.05.08.A.2.c) and includes characteristics such as taut plane surfaces, rectilinear forms and materials of glass and metal. Examples of other Porsche dealerships from various locations within the United States were provided in support of their corporate identification. The applicant has proposed project enhancements and provided renderings of the front and rear facades as shown in Exhibit D. A more detailed analysis of each requested deviation follows: Deviation 1. This deviation will allow the applicant to utilize decorative aluminum panels of a size greater than allowed by the land development code (LDC). Staff supported this request since the proposed panels will not appear to be discernible from what the LDC already requires and is therefore an equivalent alternative. Considering the location of the building, the surrounding uses and the details provided by the applicant, this deviation is reasonable. Deviation 2. This deviation seeks relief from the percentage of glazing required on a façade. In this application, the north façade is requested to have a reduction in the amount of glazing from the required 25%to 17%. In discussion the applicant noted that they have added windows to this façade totaling 17% of the north exposure and that there are two additional elements that provide additional limitations on the overall glazing requirements. The first is the continuation of the aluminum panels that dominate the front façade. The panels continue along the east side of the north exposure and prohibit the addition of glazing in that area. Additionally the applicant suggested the stair tower on the west side of the north façade limited the ability for additional glazing. Removing these areas of the north façade and applying the glazing the applicant provided to the remaining area, results in 24% glazing compared to the required 25%. Staff concurred that the aluminum panel area is an architectural feature that would not allow glazing Exhibit A - Page 1 of 3 but the stair tower could allow glazing. Considering the location of the building, the surrounding uses and the details provided by the applicant, this deviation is reasonable. Deviation 3. This deviation seeks relief from a requirement to provide roof line changes in buildings greater than 5000 square feet. The applicants provides for a curved front façade interrupted by an approximate fifteen foot wide separation about midway within the front of the building. This separation element is an architectural feature that steps back from the front of the façade by several or more feet and extends from ground level to a high point with the top of the front facade. This architectural element does not change the roof elevation but reflects a change in depth. As a result it is not considered a roof line change even thought it splits the front façade into two curves. In review of the overall architectural improvements to this building, the necessity to modify a linear roof line view appears sufficiently met with the elevations as proposed. Considering the location of the building, the surrounding uses and the details provided by the applicant, this deviation is reasonable. Deviation 4. This deviation seeks relief from color saturation levels on the east, west and north facades. The applicant desires to use darker colors (noted by applicant as black and dark grey) in portions of the facades that will exceed the maximum use of such colors above the allowed 10%. The colors selected by the applicant represent a national branding theme for Porsche dealerships; a list of similar projects that have used this theme was provided. The west facade will be substantially blocked from view by a 2-story parking area for the display of vehicles. The saturation level of this west facade is 64% with both black and dark grey surfaces. The saturation level of the east facade is 32%; this facade also continues the wrap around aluminum architectural panels and includes a 30% glazing element. The saturation level of the north façade would utilize an area that is 66% above the saturation allowance. The colors used would be 54% black in the form of architectural metal panels and 12% dark grey in other areas. The applicant provided a rendering of the north elevation indicating the enhancements provided through various landscape elements and the architectural style of this elevation. Considering the location of the building, the surrounding uses and the details provided by the applicant, this deviation is reasonable. Deviation 5. This deviation seeks relief from the percentage of a façade that limits metal panel use to 33% of any facade. The applicant is requesting 68% use on the south façade, 69% on the east façade, 70% on the north facade and 37% on the west facade. The metal panels are in two forms: one is the silver metallic metal panels that warp around much of the building, primarily on the south façade; and two, the architecturally applied ribbed metal panels applied to the building surfaces on portions of the remaining facades. These metal elements are not structural elements but are architecturally applied panels. The silver and black architecturally applied panels are an integral part of the national branding standards for Porsche; a list of similar projects was provided that supports this statement. Staff acknowledges these are architectural elements and this request is appropriate. Considering the location of the building, the surrounding uses and the details provided by the applicant, this deviation is reasonable. Exhibit A- Page 2 of 3 Deviation 6. This deviation is to allow windows to begin at a lower elevation than provided in the LDC. Staff believes the applicant's request meets the intent of the LDC since the windows in question abut a private sidewalk and not a public sidewalk. Considering the location of the building, the surrounding uses and the details provided by the applicant, this deviation is reasonable. Deviation 7. This deviation seeks relief from requirements for parking structures to limit the façade area of a parking deck within 42 inches above each floor/deck from being open more than 50 percent and to allow the south façade to use cable railing for 100% of this area. The second floor parking area along the south façade is used as a display area for vehicles. The cable railing will provide a means to use this area for display since a solid wall does not allow visual viewing. This parking structure is used for merchandise display and is not operated solely as a parking garage. According to the applicant 77% of the second floor parking will be for display of vehicles. Considering the location of the building, the surrounding uses and the details provided by the applicant, this deviation is reasonable. Deviation 8. This deviation requests the use of royal palms in lieu of canopy trees as required by 4.06.05.D.2.a. of the LDC. The royal palms will be installed with an overall height of 24 feet, which exceeds the LDC requirement of 10 foot clear trunks at the time of planting. Considering the location of this site, the surrounding uses and the details provided by the applicant, this deviation is reasonable. Exhibit A - Page 3 of 3 Deviation 1: LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8.b. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.8.b. which states that control or expansion joints are considered a blank wall area unless used as a decorative pattern and spaced at 120 square feet per panel or less, to instead allow the Porsche "floating cap" decorative aluminum panel to be 144 square feet. Deviation 2: LDC 4.02.16.D.8.c.ii. Allow Terrace Avenue Facade to have less than 25% glazing. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.D.8.c.ii., that is from the GTMUD-MXD, which requires that secondary street frontages provide 25% glazing of the secondary street facade, to instead allow 17% glazing on the secondary street facade facing Terrace Boulevard to the North. Deviation 3: LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i. Roof Line changes. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i which requires that buildings larger than 5,000 square foot gross building area provide a minimum of two roof- edge or parapet line changes, at least one such changes shall be provided on primary facade, and additional roof-edge or parapet line changes must be provided for every 100 linear feet of the facade length, to instead allow a 190 linear foot roof line with no parapet line changes along the south facade facing Davis Boulevard. Deviation 4: LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i. Use of Color above Level 8 Saturation Exceeding Allowable Percentages. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i which states the use of colors or materials above level 8 saturation is limited to no more than 10% of a facade, to instead allow colors above a level 8 saturation of 66% of the north facade facing Terrace Avenue, 32% of the east facade facing the Combs commercial property, and 64% of the west facade that facing the proposed 2-story parking garage. Deviation 5: LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.i. Use of Metal Panels Exceeding Allowable Percentage. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.i. which limits corrugated or metal panels to no more than 33% of the facade area, to instead allow 68% on the south facade facing Davis Boulevard, 69% on the east facade, 70% on the north facade facing Terrace Avenue, and 37% on the west facade. Deviation 6: LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii. Allow windows at grade up to 8 feet above grade. The applicant seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii. which states that windows shall be located between 2 and 7 feet above sidewalk grade,to instead allow windows to be located between 0 and 8 feet above sidewalk grade. Deviation 7: LDC Section 5.05.08.D.8.e. Parking Structure Open Area The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.D.8.e. which states that for Parking Structures, the facade area within 42 inches above each floor/deck shall not be open more than 50 percent, except at openings for vehicle or pedestrian access, to instead allow the south facade of the parking structure facing Davis Boulevard to have a cable railing that will be open for 100 percent of the facade length. Deviation 8: LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a. Use of Royal Palms as Canopy Trees for 100% Davis buffer. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.06.05.D.2.a. which states that Roystonea (aka Royal Palms) shall count one palm for one canopy tree and that palms may be substituted for up to 30-percent of required canopy trees with the exception that no more than 30-percent of canopy trees may be substituted by palms within each individual Type `D' road right-of-way landscape buffer, to instead allow Royal Palms as a substitution for 100% of the required canopy trees within the Davis Boulevard Type 'D' road right-of-way buffer. Exhibit B Deviations Detail DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples June 23,2016 Exhibit C Legal Description Lots 20,21,22, 23,24,25,26, 2 r ,36,37,38, 39, 40,‘41, , Block A, Rock Creek Park, according to the or lat there.f •corded in Plat B►, 4Vil-- ge 79, of the Public Records of 8 map p Collier Count), Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT the East 15 feet of Lot , I tut Rock Creek Park, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 79, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, taken by that certain Order of Taking, Case No. 89-957-CA recorded in Official Records Book 1472, Page 1618,Public Records of-Collier County,Florida; ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT that portion of Lot 20,Block A, Rock Creek Park,according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book I, Page 79, conveyed to Collier County as described in Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 4895, Page 2551, Public Records of Collier County,Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 70720400101 Exhibit D __ Page 1 of 3 _ I ii FE S s>" 6 6 \ F t a z q fm 6. 1 :R ...._z x 8 ,IlmF. 1, N DIM PON 1.I , p. 1.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. .ra. m` m s .. 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD,SURE 102 PORSCHE OF NAPLES m•�p Iiiii ) ESlE0.0,FLORIDA 33928 • Y PHONE:(239)405-9148 8 FAX:(239)288-2537 WWW JNEVANSENGINEERING.COM • s OPEN SPACE COMPARISON EXHIBIT F+0^,2 i a� ; FL COAp29226 n O Do Exhibit D Page 2 of 3 ca. i): CD—s. tkliiii"."DM 0 N ,A- '-IF is CTIz r raj , \ # 1 1\ , _ --sem 1 Porsche of Naples - 3147 Davis Blvd. AMSI PRAXIS IExhibit D co aj CT Z mTj - — —v O v ,e3of3 m cn cp 0 .., ..., ,, 0 0_ = ..1 1 ,s, o °c m x a: , qcD o0 m in cg ' CD CD N N a IV _ -- CO O -0 �"' °p y :- pow' — u - IP i .��m i 'Ta I c • zca1 .. • O. 3 I` H P. 30CC) l• o h '''''' = ''''',"'"'": oc 1 gF gA z T Site Plan for Deviations Revisions * Under ANALYSIS: in the Staff Report Staff has reviewed the requested deviation against the established criteria for Site Plans with Deviations under LDC Section 10.02.03.F.7, and provide the below analysis. 3. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. The proposed deviations recommended by staff will have a beneficial effect. It is staff opinion that the proposed development,while not fully meeting current LDC requirements, does propose building-site-and landscape improvements that exceed the requirements upon which the site was originally developed. The proposed improvements will have both a visual and economic beneficial effect for the surrounding neighborhood and unincorporated Collier County for this currently vast existing development. While Staff in not supporting certain deviations due to LDC Section 10.02.03.F.7 requirement for acceptable alternative or equivalent, thee deviations requested will have a visual and economic beneficial effect for the surrounding neighborhood and unincorporated Collier County for this currently existin dement. 4. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose The proposed deviations recommended by Staff will not change the current land area within the development and are adequate to serve the intended purpose. 5. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed deviations recommended by staff meet the purpose and intent of the LDC regulations as noted above for the proposed redevelopment. The additional architectural, site and landscape improvements of the deviations proposed are appropriate and will be of benefit to the community. millilllieumwor 1 IL m CD 0 i t -- *41;."t CD IF CM _.j.. . 1 C".) I , "...,,i 4,41 - , , ,, c, , , _L. cn ' 9 J 1 ;.£s a it tt 1..41it i .� 1 villkiii i i �;yr Porsche of Naples - 3147 Davis Blvd. AMSI PRAXIS3 I zmm 0 3 m v O a cn mO - ate � � � .111n o . cm ,,, ,...,,, = m m .,. — \V .... :__ t i ii ;\ 'r ,a N(p O 1 rn D ,j 4.t 1 li'----1 ... --- .,....,,,-",,,,, gog -oogg F \ . I • i. I i , y111 NI f -,- - I ° �it: O i.d o' n ` .gtggogi'og.ggg -, a r4 a , d 1 ! "s P:\VND 2015\160.AOTOMOTNE MOMS SERVICES\16015-02 PORSCHE NAPLES RELOCATION\01 DRAWINGS\EXHIBITS\PORSCHE OF NAPLES-SITE PWT EXHIBIT.DWG 6/22/2016 6:26 PM I • IL f I I --__.--- i F U ,� - i ! 1 CY r i I • i 6 � ' % I I i n , k I j ==' \lA.' U 0, ZA , '' ..I : 21:1 C".7 ''',%) H adv,ri P L _1. by y by 1 z � _ 1 c. ril ^ I Z trl r a ij\' G ----, tri t-, tri ....._____,i ' tT1z0I -1 ---1-__ f __ _ _ C7 . 9 � Zy �� / 7iO y L NI i 1 L x 11.4) �0rill • 6 Z ydo tiny __ -)-H IH � b � 10 ( � " N ! iti , , . ji i I '.' I.,I td C i I , 1 gl. i C9 e i 1, y y nN I I ., 11 vi r tri I 1 r •I I I o I ( ILII I I z I ,, I - - - - -- - --- -- — - - -- - 1 I I ;' J II I I I I L • 1I I I .1r I I ; I( I I 1 or N.I MM--Z--.4111M- 8. t. I 'A 2 - y 'PPxy # DATE PLAN REVISIONS mp c o 0E'g m m G,y a g=� J.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. PORSCHE OF NAPLES m ,! -.1,,. 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD,SUITE 102 _ ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 m PHONE:(239)405-9148 -_ M+ ,. g c FAX:(239)288-2537 0. ,i c WWW.IREVANSENGINEERING.COM f+ c m AGENDA ITEM 4-B Co er County STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING SERVICES SECTION, GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 23, 2016 SUBJECT: PORSCHE OF NAPLES, SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS, DR-PL20150002617 PROPERTY OWNER: Applicant: Agent: TT of Naples Kristina M. Johnson 505 S. Flagler Dr. Suite 700 J.R. Evans Engineering, P. A. West Palm Beach, FL 33401 9351 Corkscrew Road, Suite 102 Estero, FL 33928 REQUESTED ACTION: Petitioner, TT of Naples, requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks nine total deviations, including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16, relating to standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area; one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, relating to plant material standards for required landscaping; and five deviations from LDC Section 5.05.08, relating to architectural design standards for blank walls, roof treatments, building colors and materials, and parking structures, for a proposed Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.15± acres, GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side of Davis Blvd., just west of Airport- Pulling Road, in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on following page). DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 1 of 21 June 23,2016 , . D'' l mo 710 st J ., p a 7 az il 40F M S ; c, a cmien, d ?IdW T V ye u f - ....d 77/7/----_�ynrsn.-..... �,�.•. oma as S� CL , 0: ,, , . 03 cn C ... ' '........ ...''.""...'. t! "" 'S ' ' . .... ..C1 '' !7 i 4. ....77 If N -- -MirAllpir i." :!, . t ;o R z. CO p -N. ,,, # ., ... i, , . * , . ' _ qt-- r r, . - N CL .- 1 Z a. E z z c 0 0 a a a as s oadumnd uodnv 2 c O ao aookse U ---Vit: to O U J DR-P120150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 2 of 21 June 23,2016 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCELS: Existing equipment sales and repair with a zoning designation of C-5 GTMUD-MXD (Heavy Commercial District and Mixed Use District within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area(GTMUD-MXD)). SURROUNDING: North: Commercial business and Salvation Army with a zoning designation of C-5 GTMUD-MXD. East: Commercial business with a zoning designation of C-5 GTMUD- MXD. South: Davis Boulevard, commercial businesses with a zoning designation of C-5 GTMUD-MXD. West: Commercial business with a zoning designation of C-5 GTMUD-MXD I. 1 - 14 , V 4 Toru ua... .. 2912 111 , Galt Subject Property . 1(36 mp z. , t 1G6 mph UMI G 4G Z�65 1 - r r. t'23' Un1I ' �'D OS I il ' ,,,it:,...„,.. , MD ,90 itr 3pFa2' f �°r _ �n.l .._ .lt . SW a 17 ax Bili j k Mg tot''t .. . r •�1 _ Mr a ,. , .1 ,...,...� ilk � . _ ,� ---orvs novo _ '..1 lt rl ,NI 1 II a .'r , , 2. _ : : '' ''' .. , _;;Nr-t.. 7.6% III' 30'._0 • -.1I i26 II 1,, e1 w > ) li 1 .irr iR . irj i !:4 .Illl I' s99a�e" ii - ws 1�7Y -•-- t It V. -, "' N'srTtrill-... x t* � s a /' DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 3 of 21 June 23,2016 Aerial Photo(not to scale) APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUESTED DEVIATION: The petitioner is seeking nine (9) deviations from the requirements of the Land Development Code(LDC). The deviations are listed below with staff analysis and recommendations. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8.b. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.8.b. which states that control or expansion joints are considered blank wall area unless used as a decorative pattern and spaced at 120 square feet per panel or less, to instead allow the Porsche "floating cap" decorative aluminum panel to be 144 square feet. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide. The architectural style is indicative of "Modern International" which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c., whose characteristics include taut plane surfaces, rectilinear forms, with materials of glass and metal. Out of 186 dealerships in America, 166 have this exterior façade design. It has not been changed significantly in over 15 years. Of the remaining (less than 20) most of those is part of another showroom that does not have an exterior presence. Additionally, they use the same design in Europe. The Porsche Group spent extensive time, effort, study and funds to have a prototype architectural design developed for use in construction of the Porsche Dealerships, Showrooms and Museum displays. The proposed Porsche building has been designed based on the standard prototype which includes a "floating cap" architectural feature consisting of an aluminum panel design that includes aluminum panels with an area of 144 square feet. The LDC requires 120 square feet per panel generally 10' x 12'. We are requesting use of 144 square feet per panel generally 12' x 12' which from the street(from observing other Porsche Facilities) does not appear to be discernible. The panels are a high end, high quality aluminum material that carries forward the Porsche principles of innovation, design, functionality, and performance. The panels are a standard clip system with reveals at 3/4" deep by '/2" wide. The "floating cap" aluminum panels are a main architectural feature of the building and are visible on all four (4) facades creating a unified appearance for the building. Pictures of an existing Porsche building have been included with this deviation package which illustrates the "floating cap" and 144 square foot panels. As an enhancement the "floating cap" has been designed with a reduced panel along the top of the façade that provides a trim feature to create an appearance of a cornice along the roofline (shown below). Also the pedestrian sidewalk in front of the building will have a decorative pavers/ stamped concrete and decorative planters (shown below) that complement the architectural style of the building. Lastly the south landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the modern architectural style of the building. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 4 of 21 June 23,2016 The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this deviation request. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The request is due to "corporate brand" and the desire to create a particular architectural image. The applicant proposes on using decorative aluminum panels spaced 144 square feet per panel as opposed to the LDC required 120 square feet per panel. Staff can support this requested deviation and agrees with the applicant's statement that from the street, the proposed panels will not appear to be discernible from what the LDC already requires. Based on this, staff sees this deviation as an equivalent alternative which is allowed by code. Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved and can support this deviation. Deviation 2: LDC 4.02.16.D.8.c.ii. Allow Terrace Avenue Façade to have less than 25% glazing. The,applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.D.8.c.ii., that is from the GTMUD-MXD, which requires that secondary street frontages provide 25% glazing of the secondary street facade, to instead allow 17% glazing on the secondary street façade facing Terrace Boulevard to the North. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: The proposed Porsche dealership property has frontage on both Davis Boulevard to the south and Terrace Boulevard to the north. An industry standard is to orientate the sales center and vehicle displays towards a major vehicle right-of-way which in this case is Davis Boulevard to the south. In choosing this orientation the back of the building, which consists of the vehicle service/maintenance area, is orientated towards Terrace Avenue to the north. Due to the functionality of the vehicle service/maintenance area, Porsche corporate typically does not place windows on this façade. In an effort to meet this requirement windows have been added to this facade which result in 17%glazing. The north façade has limited wall space available to accomplish the glazing while still providing the structural shear walls on this site which is located in a hurricane zone. As shown below the North façade area is 4,685 square feet. The applicant is proposing 811 square feet of glazing, achieved through the use of glass roll up doors and windows resulting in 17% glazing. This façade includes 739 square feet of the architectural '`floating cap" feature and 562 square feet for the stairwell resulting in 1,301 square feet that cannot easily support windows without losing the DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 5 of 21 June 23, 2016 integrity of the design and functionality. By reducing the 4,685 square foot façade by 1,301 square feet the modified façade area is 3,384 square feet. Based on this modified façade area of 3,384 square feet the proposed 811 square feet of glazing results in 24% glazing. a.N,r.•..a.,.�.n..'"'ate .n„r r.w•°"-".sw° 'v � �! # f 1 6. 111111111111111imi h irn' ti .. �gl.S5z;rt`" '�.,. Norte EievaCai iRemy Facade) Lail..... FLOATING CAP TOTAL FACADE STAIRWELL AREA=739 SF AREA=4,685 SF AREA=562 SF Furthermore the zoning on the north and south sides of Terrace Avenue in the location of the Porsche property is C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial designation. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The request is due to "corporate brand" and "industry standard" and the desire to create a particular architectural image. The LDC normally requires 30 percent glazing on primary facades. Because this property is within the GTMUD-MXD, 25 percent glazing is only required. The petitioner's rationale is that "due to the functionality of the vehicle service/maintenance area, Porsche corporate typically does not place windows on this façade. " Although this façade is for Porsche's service area, this area will still be seen from Terrace Avenue, southbound Airport Pulling Road, and the Salvation Army sports complex. LCD Section 10.02.03 F. 3.a. clearly states "Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly stated." The applicant has not offered any mitigation for this deviation. The applicant does not intend to meet current standards to the maximum extent possible consistent with the purpose and intent of this section of the LDC nor provide any equivalent alternative. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. Deviation 3 LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i. Roof Line changes The applicapt seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i which requires that buildings larger than 5,000 square foot gross building area provide a minimum of two roof-edge or parapet line changes, at least one such changes shall be provided on primary façade, and additional roof-edge or parapet line changes must be provided for every 100 linear feet of the façade length, to instead allow a 190 linear foot roof line with no parapet line changes along the south façade facing Davis Boulevard. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 6 of 21 June 23,2016 Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide. The architectural style is indicative of "Modern International" which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c., whose characteristics include taut plane surfaces and rectilinear forms. In keeping with this style Porsche's standard building has a "floating cap" architectural feature with an uninterrupted roofline that is located along the entire south façade facing Davis Boulevard with the exception of a 15-foot wide slot at the front entry that splits the "floating cap" into two curves. The applicant is requesting the south façade to have a 190 linear foot continuous roofline which exceeds the code requirement of providing a roof line change every 100 linear feet. The "floating cap" architectural feature is a continuous curve that wraps around the southern portion of the east side of the building near the Service Drive and New Vehicle Delivery area. It also wraps the south portion of the west side of the building near the Showroom. Due to the "floating cap" architectural feature there is no change in parapet height along the south façade facing Davis Boulevard providing a clean roof line. As previously mentioned the "floating cap" is a curved feature. The curve provides the appearance of movement along the south façade as opposed to a flat surface. Also the pedestrian sidewalk in front of the building will have a decorative pavers/ stamped concrete that complement the architectural style of the building. Lastly the south landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the "Modern International" architectural style of the building. 0 : . k A l'%., .. r "` ..o,,.....-.-....-...+ ...rw.++�.......-.r.....2--.. .e. - CURVED FLOATING CAP The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 7 of 21 June 23, 2016 Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant has not offered any viable equivalent to code and that the applicant intends on only offering "corporate brand" as a rationale for the deviation requested. In the areas that the applicant intends on providing a roof line change, the applicant proposes a two (2) foot roof line change instead of the LDC minimum three (3) feet. LCD Section 10.02.03 F. 3.a. clearly states "Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly stated." The applicant does not intend to meet current standards to the maximum extent possible consistent with the purpose and intent of this section of the LDC nor provide any equivalent alternative. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. Deviation 4: LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i. Use of Color above Level 8 Saturation Exceeding Allowable Percentages. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i which states the use of colors or materials above level 8 saturation is limited to no more than 10% of a façade,to instead allow colors above a level 8 saturation of 66% of the north façade facing Terrace Avenue, 32% of the east facade facing the Combs commercial property, and 64% of the west facade that facing the proposed 2-story parking garage. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide. The colors and materials used on their buildings are unique to Porsche and helps identify their brand and carry forward the Porsche principles of innovation, design, functionality, and performance. The applicant is proposing three (3) materials that are above Level 8 Saturation. One (1) material is a black corrugated metal material, one (1) material is a Dark Grey Exterior Insulation Finishing System EIFS material, and one (1) material is a black coiling overhead door. On both the north and east facades the black corrugated metal will act as a neutral backdrop to allow the silver panels on the Showroom to be the prominent design feature. This is durable material, which is desirable for a building with vehicles driving close to the building throughout the day. The applicant is also proposing a dark grey exterior insulation finishing system (EIFS) on the west façade that complements both the black metal and silver panels of the building. On the north façade facing Terrace Avenue the applicant is proposing 66% of the total façade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. Of the 66%, 54% is the black corrugated metal siding and 12% is the Dark Grey EIFS. The north facade includes fully glazed high-speed overhead doors (shown below) that further complement the design aesthetic of the building. As previously mentioned the zoning on the north and south sides of Terrace Avenue are C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial designation. As the applicant is proposes to install Royal Palms on both side of the access driveways along Terrace Avenue. These Royal Palms will provide emphasis at the accesses and will also provide a cohesive landscape plan that matches the Royal Palms proposed along the entire Davis Boulevard buffer. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 8 of 21 June 23,2016 On the east facade the applicant is proposing 32% of the total façade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. The entire 32% is the black corrugated metal material. The east façade includes a fully glazed high-speed overhead door that further complements the design aesthetic of the building. This facade proposes 30% glazing in addition to the four (4) required building design treatments per 5.05.08.C.5.b. Lastly this façade faces the Combs oil facility to the east zoned C-5 which is the most intense commercial designation. On the west facade the applicant is proposing 64% of the total façade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. Of the 64%, 50% is the Dark Grey EIFS and 14% is the black coiling overhead doors for the vehicle detail bays. The west façade is not visible from the street or from the adjacent C-5 zoned commercial property and blocked from view with the 2-story parking garage located on the western portion of the property. Lastly the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area code Section 4.02.16.D.3.f allows for deviations from the exterior building color subject to the following criteria: i. The deviation request is consistent with LDC Section 5.06.00 regarding sign regulations and standards. ii. The deviation request consists of no more than 3 colors. iii. The deviation request may not be for a color which is below lightness • level 3 on the Collier County Architectural Color Charts. The applicant is consistent with the above referenced criteria as explained below: i. The deviation for exterior building color is not related to signs. ii. The deviation is for three (3) colors. iii. The colors requested in the deviation are not below lightness level 3 on the Collier County Architectural Color Charts. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 9 of 21 June 23,2016 Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant is proposing to use two (2) colors above a saturation of level 8 in dark grey and black. As opposed to the minimum 10 percent of the facade, which the LDC allows for these colors, the applicant is proposing, in some areas, over 60% of the color on the primary facade. The applicant has used "brand" and "corporate appearance" as justification for their deviation. Staff does not recognize "brand" or "corporate appearance" as a justification nor does the LDC. Staff can only address how code reads and the intent. LCD Section 10.02.03 F. 3.a. clearly states "Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly stated." If the applicant would offer, for example, more glazing or landscaping above code as a means of justifying a deviation, staff could give consideration. The applicant does not intend to meet current standards to the maximum extent possible consistent with the purpose and intent of this section of the LDC nor provide any equivalent alternative. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. Deviation 5: LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.i. Use of Metal Panels Exceeding Allowable Percentage. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.i. which limits corrugated or metal panels to no more than 33% of the façade area, to instead allow 68% on the south façade facing Davis Boulevard, 69% on the east façade, 70% on the north façade facing Terrace Avenue, and 37%on the west façade. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide. As previously mentioned the architectural style is indicative of "Modern International" which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c., whose characteristic materials for construction are "glass and steel, in combination with usually less visible reinforced concrete" per Encyclopedia Britannica. There are three (3) metal materials proposed on the building facades, one (1) material is a silver metallic metal panel on the "floating cap" (illustrated below for material reference only), one (1) material is a black corrugated metal siding (shown below), and one (1) material is a painted black coiling material used for their overhead detail bay doors (shown below). k1F-,,3;p;t�;; DR-P120150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 10 of 21 June 23,2016 The silver metallic metal panels are used in the "floating cap" architectural feature that wraps the building and is visible from all four(4) facades. This material is a high-end polished silver and is non-reflective. The black corrugated metal siding is located on the north and east facades and provides a neutral backdrop to allow the "floating cap" to be the prominent design feature on the building. The black corrugated metal is a durable material with horizontal lines that follow the architectural style. The black coiling metal overhead doors are a high quality material and finish for the detail bay service doors. The applicant is proposing 68% of the silver metallic metal panel in the "floating cap" on the south facade facing Davis Boulevard. As previously described Porsche's recognition worldwide is essential to their brand. The "floating cap" is Porsche's unique architectural feature on their buildings and is the prominent feature on the south facade. The applicant is proposing decorative paver/ stamped concrete for the pedestrian sidewalk adjacent to the building along the south facade along with decorative landscape planters. Lastly the south landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the modem architectural style of the building. The applicant is proposing a total of 69% of metal on the east facade. Of the 69%, 37% is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the "floating cap" and 32% is proposed as the black corrugated metal panels. The East facade faces the adjacent commercial property zoned C- 5. Also the east facade provides 30% glazing in addition to the four (4) required architectural design treatments. The applicant is proposing a total of 70% of metal on the north facade facing Terrace Avenue. Of the 70%, 16% is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the "floating cap" and 54% is proposed as the black corrugated metal panels. Along the Terrace Avenue frontage, Porsche is also proposing a 2-story parking garage with a "green screen" landscape feature along the north facade. The use of the "green screen" will provide visual relief and soften the facade through the use of vertical plant material. The applicant is also proposing 5 additional palm trees along the north facade that will be located in front of a section of the black corrugated metal siding. Also the property on the opposite side of Terrace Avenue is zoned C-5, the most intense commercial zoning in Collier County. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 11 of 21 June 23,2016 Lastly,the applicant is proposing a total of 37% of metal on the west facade. Of the 37%, 23% is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the "floating cap" and 14% is proposed as the black coiling overhead service doors. This facade is shielded from view to the adjacent C-5 commercial zoning due to the location of the 2-story parking garage. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant has used "brand" and "corporate appearance" as justification for their deviation. Staff does not recognize "brand" or "corporate appearance" as a justification nor does the LDC. Staff can only address how code reads and the intent. LCD Section 10.02.03 F. 3.a. clearly states "Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly stated." If the applicant would offer an equivalent alternative as a means of justifying a deviation, staff could give consideration. This is not the case. The applicant does not intend to meet current standards to the maximum extent possible consistent with the purpose and intent of this section of the LDC nor provide any equivalent alternative. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. Deviation 6: LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii. Allow windows at grade up to 8 feet above grade. The applicant seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii. which states that windows shall be located between 2 and 7 feet above sidewalk grade, to instead allow windows to be located between 0 and 8 feet above sidewalk grade. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: The applicant is proposing windows in the Porsche showroom that are intended to allow full visibility of the Porsche vehicle models being sold in the showroom which is typical for automotive dealerships. The majority of these windows are located on the south facade with some showroom windows wrapping around to the east and west facades. Porsche vehicle models are low to the ground and a 2 foot high knee wall would block most of the visibility of the vehicle. Also the requested 8 foot height is proportional to the `floating cap"metal panels located above the windows. A per the newly revised Florida Building Code, habitable buildings located within a FEMA Zone AE, which is the current flood zone for the property, are required to have a finished floor of Base Finish Floor elevation plus 1-foot. Therefore the finished floor elevation for the proposed Porsche Building is 8.0 Ft-NAVD which is approximately 4-feet above the existing Davis Boulevard travel lanes. In order for the vehicles on display to be visible it is necessary that the display windows be placed at the same grade as the sidewalk that is adjacent to the building. The existing building currently located on the property has windows located at grade; please reference the enclosed existing site photos. There are no negative impacts associated with this request. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 12 of 21 June 23,2016 4. 1I f 4 EXISTING BUILDING WITH 1 WINDOWS AT GRADE 1 Alholka — , ii. .,,,..., r.. ,...... .i, ......„. . Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant is asking for a deviation from the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Overlay District glazing requirements that would normally be allowed in 5.05.08 of the LDC architectural standards. Based on staffs review, the intent of this LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii was for windows abutting a public sidewalk, not a private sidewalk. The proposal by the applicant is to install large windows next to their proposed private sidewalk. Based on staff's research and understanding, staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. No alternative design or mitigation is required. For these reasons, staff can support this deviation. Deviation 7: LDC Section 5.05.08.D.8.e. Parking Structure Open Area The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.D.8.e. which states that for Parking Structures, the facade area within 42 inches above each floor/deck shall not be open more than 50 percent, except at openings for vehicle or pedestrian access, to instead allow the south facade of the parking structure facing Davis Boulevard to have a cable railing that will be open for 100 percent of the facade length. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 13 of 21 June 23,2016 o Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: As previously described, the proposed Porsche dealership property has frontage on Davis Boulevard to the south. It is the industry standard to orientate the sales center and vehicle displays towards a major vehicle right-of-way. The applicant wishes to utilize the second floor of the parking structure that faces Davis Boulevard, which is the top floor, to display vehicles. The other parking structure facades provide a concrete guardrail that blocks the view of the vehicles from the ground floor. The zoning on the north and south side of Davis Boulevard adjacent to Porsche property is C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial zoning. Landscape islands have been added to the ground surface parking lot directly adjacent to the parking garage foundation in order to provide vegetation adjacent to the parking garage. Additionally the middle section of the parking garage will also include a vertical green screen as shown below that will help soften the façade. These landscape islands are not required since the ground surface parking lot is completely designated for display vehicles that are for sale. The addition of the landscape islands are included to help soften the appearance of the parking garage and offsite the request to have 100%of the second story open. 11 There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of 1 , ier this request. iilli0 10, tit 1r Staff Analysis and Recommendation The applicant 1;),;f I 1'! t= I wishes to utilize the second floor of the parking - structure that faces Davis Boulevard, which is the top floor, to display vehicles. The other parking structure facades provide a concrete guardrail that blocks the view li -; _ of the vehicles from the ground floor. Staff can only ~� address how code reads and the intent. LDC Section 10.02.03 F. 3.a. clearly states "Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly stated." If the applicant would offer, for example, more landscaping above code as a means of justifying a deviation, staff could give consideration. The applicant does not intend to meet current standards to the maximum extent possible consistent with the purpose and intent of this section of the LDC nor provide any equivalent alternative. The applicant has stated in their justification that "the middle section of the parking garage will also include a vertical green screen as shown below that will help soften the façade. These landscape islands are not required since the ground surface parking lot is completely designated for display vehicles that are for sale." This statement is incorrect. The landscaping the applicant is referring to is LDC required plant material for foundation and Vehicle Use requirements. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. DR-P120150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 14 of 21 June 23,2016 Deviation 8: LDC Section 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b.1 Right-of-Way Buffer along Terrace Avenue The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b.1 which states that the landscape buffer along road rights-of-way shall be a minimum 10-foot wide Type D Buffer, to instead allow a minimum of a 6.5-foot wide Type D Buffer for 76 linear feet along Terrace Avenue. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: The required building setback along Terrace Avenue is 6.5-feet and in order to eliminate the third driveway connection from the property to Terrace Avenue the internal building areas were modified so that the vehicle service area entrance is on the Porsche property. The internal building changes necessitated a building expansion to the north setback line. The loss of the 3.5' of buffer over the 76 linear feet results in 266 square feet of buffer area. This area has been compensated for further to the west in the contiguous expanded buffer area as shown below. Five small palms are proposed in this area that is in addition to the code required landscape. Furthermore Royal Palms are proposed on either side of the two (2) access driveways off Terrace Avenue. The Royal Palms along Terrace will match the Royal Palms proposed all along Davis Boulevard providing a cohesive appearance from both rights-of-way. There is no reduction in the required plantings along this buffer as a result of this request. - - ---- - $�lJ21bGOY 'LPP - INTO BUFFER - ROYAL PALMS ICES 11 . TERRACE AVE OICA .. ' AT ENTRANCE 11" _ 0 -� Ell El --- © Calm b? © Ie ii, r.,-,, a��-�� -ov'74�- �"o�.�oo�a opo roto^oo� o� 000 0 ? .� 7,Ifo-- 111,1o a �L m'/f: o ,o' �roo-^o,o..000 e.o .0co no „a� A.Y oo.o t— i•i- if . ' .I�` - �` ` BNIhr Ccn snuio Airdy, ` ,fai >O ' . I C \\� '\ 572 st Building PsiMreW PIsnb 1 7 1 V/ fri •7dWA It; ei; i co.* 270 sf Budding Pe imsW Planing ' ..,,,,ii.. 1 It S all 6 BUFFER .! Lon e-- COMPENSATION "� ,V a.. 5 ADDITIONAL €� • . AREA PALMS L 4urm:. ROYAL PALMS AT ENTRANCE There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this request. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The required minimums for building setbacks along Terrace Avenue are 6.5 feet according to the Gateway Triangle Overlay. The intent of the building setback was for the purposes of abutting a public sidewalk or plaza. A 20+Type D buffer currently exists along Terrace Avenue exceeding code. The applicant is asking to create a currently conforming buffer into a non-conforming landscape buffer. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 15 of 21 June 23,2016 10.02 F.1. states: Purpose. A site plan with deviations shall provide a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations,excluding height, architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings,structures or site features nonconforming. The intent of 10.02.03. F., Site Plan with Deviations, was to allow for site features that were existing nonconforming elements of the code, to be possibly allowed through justification. The applicant is asking to allow existing features (buffer), in conformance with code, to be nonconforming. Although the applicant has offered some compensating features for the request (additional plant material), the applicant has not met the purpose. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. Deviation 9: LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a. Use of Royal Palms as Canopy Trees for 100% Davis buffer. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.06.05.D.2.a. which states that Roystonea (aka Royal Palms) shall count one palm for one canopy tree and that palms may be substituted for up to 30-percent of required canopy trees with the exception that no more than 30-percent of canopy trees may be substituted by palms within each individual Type 'D' road right-of-way landscape buffer, to instead allow Royal Palms as a substitution for 100% of the required canopy trees within the Davis Boulevard Type 'D' road right-of-way buffer. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: The Porsche development is required to provide a 10-foot wide Type 'D' landscape buffer along Davis Boulevard with trees spaced no more than 30-feet on-center per LDC Section 4.06.05.C.4.a. According to this section of code, the 304 linear feet of Davis Boulevard frontage requires 10 canopy trees. In addition, the Gateway Triangle Redevelopment overlay code requires "Parking Lot landscaping" to provide one tree or palm spaced 25-feet on-center as per Section 4.02.16.E.3.c.i. According to the overlay code for the "Parking Lot Landscaping," the 304 linear feet of Davis frontage requires 13 trees or palms. The applicant is requesting a deviation from section 4.06.05.D.2.a. to allow the use of 100% Royal Palms, 13 total, in the Davis Boulevard road right-of-way landscape buffer. The Royal Palms will be installed with an overall height of 24' which is more than the code required 10' of clear trunk at the time of planting. The taller Royal Palms are an enhancement to the development that will provide a presence along Davis Boulevard. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 16 of 21 June 23,2016 r►a.�o Ae o _ n .":., .i .W`dnn I'. ...� TTI' jiPrr ung iralan ,WI)4gk)+ �, ©10 .a,>t sq vue�; r'. mama_ aue • 6iNJCT1l.: H1—N .% �4; U y J ^t Gi••114..1.11 X.laj• Ftl)1'Ai.PAL4f4 0 liSk; •( - At •• ..u)aee sd'swww Mu •° .Y✓ r. Ati7\,f)A6`K :�+ een.r•ft..�kvire ul u. ve•in" StEY?5 C Al'.L:. to -—` /014 Ili I ..1. L�,`�� ¢ ' 'oho foam 0 '"rte --_al al VWt — _ r»•.p...�.M•, ___ caarM,p� NI. f�lli 1 1wx..w wdr..o.�„ / 0 1 ' 0 \ lCMnM... i... 1k- u , ol© 4 maim rw� I ato .. •. .w. ,/Uia�Y•rw. /t�l� A �, >n wrw o i O Fl 0 .,r.. `r` -._1 4I fill i e `' ` � @) l aJ to .1 et r it 0,,....-,..--1,,,.:.i'.•'.�,1"►`r� '1�Sr,>.'"* .,' .�.d[.,"r•n':,�nM'2 `.�>F .;� oaw� -'rti_. qac __:, f ._ ►-,i .�. .s.J _ . :cs-..:.. , �V,t R.-..._'•a ,. /iti The existing property has four (4) quality Royal Palms at the entrance that the applicant would like to utilize within the proposed Porsche project. In an effort to utilize these existing Royal Palms and provide a landscape plan that complemented the "Modern International" architecture style of the building, Royal Palms are being requested along the entire Davis Boulevard frontage and an additional four (4) Royal Palms are proposed at the two (2) access connections to Terrace Avenue to the North. The use of the Royal Palms along both street frontages provides a cohesive appearance Apr the site. There arc no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this request. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request if approved because the applicant is using existing plant material (Royal Palms) on site and proposing larger Royal Palms than code requires (14' high trees required, 24' high trees proposed). In this case, the applicant has offered "project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviation."For these reasons, staff can support the requested deviation. ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the requested deviation against the established criteria for Site Plans with Deviations under LDC Section 10.02.03.F.7, and provide the below analysis. I. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. DR-P!20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 17 of 21 June 23,2016 Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report. The proposed deviations will not change the permitted land uses and densities within the development. 2. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Staff is of the opinion that the project as proposed will remain consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the project to be compatible with neighborhood development. Staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. The petition can also be deemed consistent with the CCME and the Transportation Element. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP because uses are not changing with this amendment. 3. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. The proposed deviations recommended by staff will have a beneficial effect. It is staff opinion that the proposed development,while not fully meeting current LDC requirements, does propose building-site-and landscape improvements that exceed the requirements upon which the site was originally developed. The proposed improvements will have both a visual and economic beneficial effect for the surrounding neighborhood and unincorporated Collier County for this currently vacant development. 4. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose The proposed deviations recommended by staff will not change the current land area within the development and are adequate to serve the intended purpose. 5. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed deviations recommended by staff meet the purpose and intent of the LDC regulations as noted above for the proposed redevelopment. The additional architectural, site and landscape improvements proposed are appropriate and will be of benefit to the community. 6. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 18 of 21 June 23,2016 Staff has reviewed the information provided by the applicant and is of the opinion that the project will exceed the standards required of the development when originally permitted and will contain a better visual character than the existing structure currently. 7. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. At time of the Site Improvement Plan and Building Permit processing the proposed development improvements are subject to applicable maintenance requirements as well as standard confirmation and authorization of common ownership(s). 8. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. Staff fmds that the petitioner's deviations recommended by staff are delineated and represent the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project as outlined and stated by the agents in the application. 9. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. The applicant is proposing to provide alternative architectural and landscape enhancements on some of the deviations that will serve as a benefit to the surrounding area and Collier County. However, there are six (6) deviations that are not supported by staff because an equivalent or alternative has not been proposed. Although the applicants proposed project seems to be an improvement over existing, staff feels it can only limit its recommendation to alternatives proposed and the not the project itself. 10. Approval of the deviation(s)will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report. Further, based on the information provided in the application the proposed deviations recommended by staff, should not adversely affect adjacent properties. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office reviewed the staff report for this petition on June 13, 2016. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 19 of 21 June 23,2016 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve the following deviations of Porsche of Naples, Site Plan with Deviations, DR-PL20150002617. Deviation 1 is approved. The applicant has proposed an equivalent alternative. Deviation 2 is denied. A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was not proposed. Deviation 3 is denied. A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was not proposed. Deviation 4 is denied. A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was not proposed. Deviation 5 is denied. A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was not proposed. Deviation 6 is approved. The deviation meets the intent of code language. Deviation 7 is denied. A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was not proposed. Deviation 8 is denied. The deviation is asking for a current conforming buffer to be non- conforming. Deviation 9 is approved. A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was proposed. Approval of this petition shall be subject to the completion of the Site Improvement Plan Amendment(SIP) currently under review and all associated Building Permits as applicable. Attachments: A. Deviation Exhibit - Map with Deviations B. Supporting Documents by Applicant DR-P120150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 20 of 21 June 23,2016 PREPARED BY: c\ .�.._ C /1/1° 116p DANIEL J• I:7SMITH,AICP, 'RINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING SERVICES SECTION - REVIEWED BY: r 6 / 3-/C, RAY B LOWS, MANAGER DATE ZONING SERVICES SECTION - I3 -I(p MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 21 of 21 June 23,2016 J I I I I ', I I I I I I I I II �– - I .I rt—I – - -I ' - LI-- I – L J - I I – . TERRACE AVENUE 8 ` a (60'WIDE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) ––– co cN \ J. �� I a I �ry I p10111' ti CD —fid tk�' I W I 1 i1 z —1 1 I • i 1 I IN'' _� iI -o 14'41 111111P a it I Alai ' x �( [ VAr1� g r. kr•l Nµ. I z — l.. P r , x v s .. D. ,141111111111 - El (pit 044,.,,,,,,,T,"'". �� 6P ke- 1 "0„,41,A4 y ., J„,'',r R;4-s 4 0.\ re fr'a fi ��" ti 'i i�...K .3'' ,"4,'53alt ia �:. , cn % f a 'eiii B rV ' ' ,h' a A .;'fix ' �s ., Fri ^ ' o :hi',,*,^7'' _ ` ra 4r P 4�g�J - . "n.I, 6° d " (a,00 • v hitif, ia1 o a JIo- r � 0-. ay Io r„ ..,,,,,,,:g ;V..$1.rptpi0:,..y- ' , ? tp rtlyN�Nhm. ,. H,#:,. A,...,1' I �t 3,.1 I OV .!s, #a, d /Ilk,-,— .......1 ' �k.,.r. ;�, ,,,....,‘,/,..e..;le ,.c.......M.,, . z DAVIS BOULEVARD „r. A ....__ .._..•.. id "` 9 _. — (100'WIDE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) •7 i N w w U_ w N 0 25' 50' 0 o SCALE: 1" = 50' D < • g J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. PROJECT#: 16015-02 7 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD,SUITE 102 PORSCHE OF NAPLES FILE DATE: 04-20-2016 ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 N PHONE:(239)405-9148 DESIGN BY: KMJ Z FAX:(239)288-2537 SEC. 2,TOWN. 50 S,R. 25 E 5 WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM DEVIATIONS EXHIBIT KRISTINA M. JOHNSON P.E. a FL COA k 29226 __..._ 1°=50' FL. LICENSE #: 73793 Attachment A " Deviation 1:LDC 5.05.08.C.8.b. (Blank wall area greater than 120 sf) The applicant seeks relief from LOC 5.05.08.C.8.b.which states that control or expansion joints are considered blank wall area unless used as a decorative pattern and spaced at 120 square feet per panel or less,to instead allow the Porsche"floating cap"decorative aluminum panel to be 144 square feet. Deviation 2:LDC 4.02.16.D.8.c.ii. Bayshore Gateway Triangle(Allow Terrace Avenue facade to have less than 25%glazing) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.118.c.ii. from the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area,which requires that secondary street frontages provide 25%glazing of the secondary street facade,to instead allow 17%glazing of the secondary street facade facing Terrace Boulevard to the North. Deviation 3:LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i. (Roof Line changes) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.10,b.i which requires that buildings larger than 5,000 square foot gross building area provide a minimum of two roof-edge or parapet line changes,at least one such changes shall be provided on primary facade,and additional roof-edge or parapet line changes must be provided for every 100 linear feet of the facade length,to instead allow one roof line with no parapet line changes along the south facade facing Davis Boulevard. Deviation 4:LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i. (Use of Color Above Level 8 Saturation exceeding allowable percentages) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C,13.b.i which states the use of colors or materials above level 8 saturation is limited to no more than a. 10%of a facade,to instead allow colors above a Level 8 saturation of 66%of the north facade facing Terrace Avenue,and 32%of the east facade, and 64%of the west facade. Deviation 5:LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.ii. (Use of Metal Panels exceeding allowable percentages) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.ii.which limits Corrugated or metal panels to no more than 33%of the facade area,to instead ffa- allow 68%on the south facade facing Davis Boulevard,69%on the east facade,70%on the north facade facing Terrace Avenue,and 37%on the west facade. Deviation 6:LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii.- Bayshore Gateway Triangle(Allow windows at grade up to 8 feet above grade) The applicant seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.16,D.8.d.ii.which states that windows shall be located between 2 and 7 feet above sidewalk grade,to instead allow windows to be located between 0 and 8 feet above sidewalk grade. Deviation 7:LDC Section 5.05.08.D.8.e. (Parking Structure Open Area) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.D.8.e.which states that for Parking Structures,the facade area within 42 inches above each floor/deck shall not be open more than 50 percent,except at openings for vehicle or pedestrian access,to instead allow the south facade of the parking Z structure facing Davis Boulevard to have a cable railing that will be open for 100 percent of the facade length. Deviation 8:LDC Section 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b).1). (Right-of-Way Buffer along Terrace Avenue) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b).1).which states that the landscape buffer along road rights-of-way shall be a minimum 10-foot wide Type D Buffer,to instead allow a minimum of a 6.5-foot wide Type D Buffer for 76 linear feet along Terrace Avenue. 0 O Deviation 9:LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a.JUse of Royal Palms as Canopy Trees for 100%Davis buffer) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.06.05.D.2.a.which states that Roystonea(aka Royal Palms)shall count one palm for one canopy tree and that palms may be substituted for up to 30-percent of required canopy trees with the exception that no more than 30-percent of canopy trees may be substituted by palms within each individual Type"D"road right of way landscape buffer,to instead allow Royal Palms as a substitution for 100%of O the required canopy trees within the Davis Boulevard Type"D"road right of way buffer, 0 O 0 V K w V W 0 0 Q J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. PROJECT#: 16015-02 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD,SUITE 102 PORSCHE OF NAPLES FILE DATE: 04-20-2016 ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 PHONE:(239)405-9148 DESIGN BY: KMJ FAX:(239)288-2537 SEC. 2,TOWN. 50 S,R. 25 E WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM DEVIATIONS EXHIBIT KRISTINA M. JOHNSON P.E. FL.COA#29226 SCALE: N/A FL. LICENSE #: 73793 • A J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING PORSCHE OF NAPLES- DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS Dated: 4-20-2016 Deviation 1: LDC 5.05.08.C.8.b. (Blank Wall Area Greater Than 120 Square Feet) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C,8.b. which states that control or expansion joints are considered blank wall area unless used as a decorative pattern and spaced at 120 square feet per panel or less, to instead allow the Porsche"floating cap"decorative aluminum panel to be 144 square feet. Justification 1: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide.The architectural style is indicative of"Modern International"which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c., whose characteristics include taut plane surfaces, rectilinear forms, with materials of glass and metal. Out of 186 dealerships in America, 166 have this exterior facade design. It has not been changed significantly in over 15 years. Of the remaining (less than 20) most of those are part of another showroom that does not have an exterior presence, Additionally, they use the same design in Europe. The Porsche Group spent extensive time, effort, study and funds to have a prototype architectural design developed for use in construction of the Porsche Dealerships, Showrooms and Museum displays. The proposed Porsche building has been designed based on the standard prototype which includes a "floating cap" architectural feature consisting of an aluminum panel design that includes aluminum panels with an area of 144 • square feet. The LDC requires 120 square feet per panel generally 10' x 12'. We are requesting use of 144 square feet per panel generally 12' x 12' which from the street (from observing other Porsche Facilities) does not appear to be discernable. The panels are a high end, high quality aluminum material that carries forward the Porsche principles of innovation, design,functionality, and performance. The panels are a standard clip system with reveals at 3/4"deep by 1/2" wide. The"floating cap" aluminum panels are a main architectural feature of the building and are visible on all four (4) facades creating a unified appearance for the building. Pictures of an existing Porsche building have been included with this deviation package which illustrates the"floating cap"and 144 square foot panels. As an enhancement the "floating cap" has been designed with a reduced panel along the top of the facade that provides a trim feature to create an appearance of a cornice along the roofline (shown below). Also the pedestrian sidewalk in front of the building will have a decorative pavers/ stamped concrete and decorative planters (shown below)that complement the architectural style of the building. Lastly the south landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the modern architectural style of the building. _.. IVA X444: ANCIA I SAM a • The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this deviation request. April 20,2016 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Page 2 of 11 • Deviation 2: LDC 4.02.16.D.8.c.ii. (Allow Terrace Avenue Facade to have less than 25%alazingl The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.D.8,c,ii., that is from the Gateway Bayshore Triangle Redevelopment Area, which requires that secondary street frontages provide 25%glazing of the secondary street facade, to instead allow 17%glazing on the secondary street facade facing Terrace Boulevard to the North. Justification 2: The proposed Porsche dealership property has frontage on both Davis Boulevard to the south and Terrace Boulevard to the north. An industry standard is to orientate the sales center and vehicle displays towards a major vehicle right-of-way which in this case is Davis Boulevard to the south. In choosing this orientation the back of the building, which consists of the vehicle service/maintenance area, is orientated towards Terrace Avenue to the north. Due to the functionality of the vehicle service/maintenance area, Porsche corporate typically does not place windows on this facade. In an effort to meet this requirement windows have been added to this facade which result in 17% glazing. The north facade has limited wall space available to accomplish the glazing while still providing the structural shear walls on this site which is located in a hurricane zone. As shown below the North facade area is 4,685 square feet. The applicant is proposing 811 square feet of glazing, achieved through the use of glass roll up doors and windows resulting in 17% glazing. This facade includes 739 square feet of the architectural "floating cap" feature and 562 square feet for the stairwell resulting in 1,301 square feet that cannot easily support windows without losing the integrity of the design and functionality. By reducing the 4,685 square foot facade by 1,301 square feet the modified facade area is 3,384 square feet. Based on this modified façade area of 3,384 square feet the proposed 811 square feet of glazing results in 24%glazing. • a NEI -, -- . NOT Swann IF'marY FacaCci FLOATING CAP TOTAL FACADE STAIRWELL/ AREA=739 SF AREA=4,685 SF AREA=562 SF Furthermore the zoning on the north and south sides of Terrace Avenue in the location of the Porsche property is C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial designation. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. • April 20,2016 Page 3 of 11 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING _...-------------- Deviation 3: LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i. (Roof Line changes) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5,05,08.C.10.b.i which requires that buildings larger than 5,000 square foot gross building area provide a minimum of two roof-edge or parapet line changes, at least one such changes shall be provided on primary facade, and additional roof-edge or parapet line changes must be provided for every 100 linear feet of the facade length, to instead allow a 190 linear foot roof line with no parapet line changes along the south façade facing Davis Boulevard. Justification 3: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide.The architectural style is indicative of"Modern International"which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c., whose characteristics include taut plane surfaces and rectilinear forms. In keeping with this style Porsche's standard building has a "floating cap" architectural feature with an uninterrupted roofline that is located along the entire south facade facing Davis Boulevard with the exception of a 15-foot wide slot at the front entry that splits the "floating cap" into two curves. The applicant is requesting the south facade to have a 190 linear foot continuous roofline which exceeds the code requirement of providing a roof line change every 100 linear feet. The"floating cap" architectural feature is a continuous curve that wraps around the southern portion of the east side of the building near the Service Drive and New Vehicle Delivery area. It also wraps the south portion of the west side of the building near the Showroom. Due to the "floating cap" architectural feature there is no change in parapet height along the south facade facing Davis Boulevard providing a clean roof line. As previously mentioned the "floating cap" is a curved feature. The curve provides the appearance of movement along the south façade as opposed to a flat surface. Also the pedestrian sidewalk in front of the building will have a decorative pavers/ stamped concrete that complement the architectural style of the building. Lastly the south 11111 landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the "Modern International"architectural style of the building. 1 As- . . _ tiY 5.m >e ' • .rte . (um-11)11.0A IINt.(AP The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. • April 20,2016 Page 4 of 11 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING • Deviation 4: LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i. (Use of Color Above Level 8 Saturation Exceeding Allowable Percentages) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i which states the use of colors or materials above level 8 saturation is limited to no more than 10%of a façade,to instead allow colors above a level 8 saturation of 66%of the north façade facing Terrace Avenue, 32%of the east facade facing the Combs commercial property, and 64%of the west facade that facing the proposed 2-story parking garage. Justification 4: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide. The colors and materials used on their buildings are unique to Porsche and helps identify their brand and carry forward the Porsche principles of innovation, design,functionality, and performance.The applicant is proposing three (3) materials that are above Level 8 Saturation. One (1) material is a black corrugated metal material,one(1) material is a Dark Grey Exterior Insulation Finishing System EIFS material, and one(1)material is a black coiling overhead door. On both the north and east facades the black corrugated metal will act as a neutral backdrop to allow the silver panels on the Showroom to be the prominent design feature. This is durable material, which is desirable for a building with vehicles driving close to the building throughout the day. The applicant is also proposing a dark grey exterior insulation finishing system(EIFS)on the west façade that complements both the black metal and silver panels of the building. On the north facade facing Terrace Avenue the applicant is proposing 66% of the total facade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. Of the 66%, 54%is the black corrugated metal siding and 12% is the Dark Grey EIFS. The north façade includes fully glazed high-speed overhead doors(shown below)that further complement the design aesthetic of the building. As previously mentioned the zoning on the north and south sides of Terrace Avenue are C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial designation.As the applicant is proposes to install Royal Palms on both side of • the access driveways along Terrace Avenue. These Royal Palms will provide emphasis at the accesses and will also provide a cohesive landscape plan that matches the Royal Palms proposed along the entire Davis Boulevard buffer. -_ On the east facade the applicant is proposing 32% of the total facade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. The entire 32%is the black corrugated metal material. The east façade includes a fully glazed high-speed overhead door that further complements the design aesthetic of the building. This facade proposes 30% glazing in addition to the four(4) required building design treatments per 5.05.08.C.5.b. Lastly this facade faces the Combs oil facility to the east zoned C-5 which is the most intense commercial designation. On the west facade the applicant is proposing 64%of the total façade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. Of the 64%, 50% is the Dark Grey EIFS and 14% is the black coiling overhead doors for the vehicle detail bays. The west facade is not visible from the street or from the adjacent C-5 zoned commercial property and blocked from view with • the 2-story parking garage located on the western portion of the property. Lastly the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area code Section 4,02.16.D.3.f allows for deviations from the exterior building color subject to the following criteria: April 20,2016 Page 5of11 • J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING The deviation request is consistent with LDC Section 5.06.00 regarding sign regulations and standards. ii. The deviation request consists of no more than 3 colors. iii. The deviation request may not be for a color which is below lightness level 3 on the Collier County Architectural Color Charts. The applicant is consistent with the above referenced criteria as explained below: The deviation for exterior building color is not related to signs. ii. The deviation is for three(3)colors. iii. The colors requested in the deviation are not below lightness level 3 on the Collier County Architectural Color Charts. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. • • April 20,2016 Page 6 of 11 • J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Deviation 5: LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.i. (Use of Metal Panels Exceeding Allowable Percentage) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.i. which limits Corrugated or metal panels to no more than 33% of the facade area, to instead allow 68%on the south facade facing Davis Boulevard, 69%on the east facade, 70% on the north facade facing Terrace Avenue, and 37%on the west facade. Justification 5: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide.As previously mentioned the architectural style is indicative of"Modern International"which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c., whose characteristic materials for construction are "glass and steel, in combination with usually less visible reinforced concrete" per Encyclopedia Britannica. There are three (3) metal materials proposed on the building facades, one (1) material is a silver metallic metal panel on the "floating cap"(illustrated below for material reference only),one(1) material is a black corrugated metal siding (shown below), and one(1) material is a painted black coiling material used for their overhead detail bay doors(shown below). • —BUCK {-$,Ac(colt.o4 COORUGATED J'.ERHE1C UE'm:S;C:.'1G 00OR �sL ri'e tING GR "..°ER IETALLIC ARTA.PANELS The silver metallic metal panels are used in the "floating cap" architectural feature that wraps the building and is visible from all four(4)facades.This material is a high-end polished silver and is non-reflective. The black corrugated metal siding is located on the north and east facades and provides a neutral backdrop to allow the"floating cap"to be • the prominent design feature on the building. The black corrugated metal is a durable material with horizontal lines that follow the architectural style. The black coiling metal overhead doors are a high quality material and finish for the detail bay service doors. AApril 20,2016 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Page 7 of 11 • The applicant is proposing 68% of the silver metallic metal panel in the "floating cap" on the south facade facing Davis Boulevard. As previously described Porsche's recognition worldwide is essential to their brand. The "floating cap" is Porsche's unique architectural feature on their buildings and is the prominent feature on the south façade. The applicant is proposing decorative paver/stamped concrete for the pedestrian sidewalk adjacent to the building along the south facade along with decorative landscape planters. Lastly the south landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the modern architectural style of the building. The applicant is proposing a total of 69% of metal on the east facade. Of the 69%, 37% is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the"floating cap"and 32%is proposed as the black corrugated metal panels. The East facade faces the adjacent commercial property zoned C-5.Also the east facade provides 30%glazing in addition to the four (4)required architectural design treatments. The applicant is proposing a total of 70%of metal on the north facade facing Terrace Avenue. Of the 70%, 16% is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the "floating cap" and 54%is proposed as the black corrugated metal panels.Along the Terrace Avenue frontage, Porsche is also proposing a 2-story parking garage with a"green screen" landscape feature along the north facade. The use of the "green screen" will provide visual relief and soften the facade through the use of vertical plant material. The applicant is also proposing 5 additional palm trees along the north façade that will be located in front of a section of the black corrugated metal siding. Also the property on the opposite side of Terrace Avenue is zoned C-5,the most intense commercial zoning in Collier County. Lastly, the applicant is proposing a total of 37% of metal on the west facade. Of the 37%, 23% is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the"floating cap"and 14%is proposed as the black coiling overhead service doors. This • facade is shielded from view to the adjacent C-5 commercial zoning due to the location of the 2-story parking garage. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. • April 20,2016 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Page 8 of 11 • Deviation 6: LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii.- Bayshore Gateway Triangle (Allow windows at grade up to 8 feet above grade) The applicant seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.16.D,8.d.ii. which states that windows shall be located between 2 and 7 feet above sidewalk grade,to instead allow windows to be located between 0 and 8 feet above sidewalk grade. Justification 6: The applicant is proposing windows in the Porsche showroom that are intended to allow full visibility of the Porsche vehicle models being sold in the showroom which is typical for automotive dealerships. The majority of these windows are located on the south facade with some showroom windows wrapping around to the east and west facades. Porsche vehicle models are low to the ground and a 2 foot high knee wall would block most of the visibility of the vehicle. Also the requested 8 foot height is proportional to the 'floating cap" metal panels located above the windows. A per the newly revised Florida Building Code, habitable buildings located within a FEMA Zone AE, which is the current flood zone for the property, are required to have a finished floor of Base Finish Floor elevation plus 1-foot. Therefore the finished floor elevation for the proposed Porsche Building is 8.0 Ft-NAVD which is approximately 4-feet above the existing Davis Boulevard travel lanes. In order for the vehicles on display to be visible it is necessary that the display windows be placed at the same grade as the sidewalk that is adjacent to the building. The existing building currently located on the property has windows located at grade; please reference the enclosed existing site photos.There are no negative impacts associated with this request. I I a 4 • EXISTING BUILDING WITH WINDOWS AT GRADE k1 • • ,1571.2507-7—t3 UP E' AApril 20,2016 Page 9 of 11 J.R. Ei,GINJEERING L • Deviation 7: LDC Section 5.05.08.D.8.e.(Parking Structure Open Area) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.D.8.e.which states that for Parking Structures,the facade area within 42 inches above each floor/deck shall not be open more than 50 percent, except at openings for vehicle or pedestrian access, to instead allow the south facade of the parking structure facing Davis Boulevard to have a cable railing that will be open for 100 percent of the facade length. Justificatior17: As previously described, the proposed Porsche dealership property has frontage on Davis Boulevard to the south. It is the industry standard to orientate the sales center and vehicle displays towards a major vehicle right-of-way. The applicant wishes to utilize the second floor of the parking structure that faces Davis Boulevard, which is the top floor, to display vehicles. The other parking structure facades provide a concrete guardrail that blocks the view of the vehicles from the ground floor. The zoning on the north and south side of Davis Boulevard adjacent to Porsche property is C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial zoning. Landscape islands have been added to the ground surface parking lot directly adjacent to the parking garage foundation in order to provide vegetation adjacent to the parking garage. Additionally the middle section of the parking garage will also include a vertical green screen as shown below that will help soften the facade, These landscape islands are not required since the ground surface parking lot is completely designated for display vehicles that are for sale. The addition of the landscape islands are included to help soften the appearance of the parking garage and offsite the request to have 100%of the second story open. I j There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this / j.. ' request. E 01 • • �� April 20,2016 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Page 10 of 11 • Deviation 8: LDC Section 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b).1). (Right-of-Way Buffer along Terrace Avenue) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b).1). which states that the landscape buffer along road rights- of-way shall be a minimum 10-foot wide Type D Buffer, to instead allow a minimum of a 6.5-foot wide Type D Buffer for 76 linear feet along Terrace Avenue. Justification 8: The required building setback along Terrace Avenue is 6.5-feet and in order to eliminate the third driveway connection from the property to Terrace Avenue the internal building areas were modified so that the vehicle service area entrance is on the Porsche property. The internal building changes necessitated a building expansion to the north setback line. The loss of the 3.5' of buffer over the 76 linear feet results in 266 square feet of buffer area. This area has beef) compensated for further to the west in the contiguous expanded buffer area as shown below. Five small palms are proposed in this area that are in addition to the code required landscape. Furthermore Royal Palms are proposed on either side of the two(2)access driveways off Terrace Avenue. The Royal Palms along Terrace will match the Royal Palms proposed all along Davis Boulevard providing a cohesive appearance from both rights-of- way. There is no reduction in the required plantings along this buffer as a result of this request. BUILUJDG OYE&LAPPPL�_ -_ _-. - -— - - - INTO BUFFER ROYAL P.ALM6 FA " -TERRACE AVE Ohrj AT ENTRAN('E mo ---- - -© oar _ .. �, m-lo- ® ®gym EMI MI I. A [ 71 ag,rovi T1 a - - -4 y{:•'!'. 0 .] OV�M, ,C.:ii 00. .00[0. _0,7:-.;0; r,00�4. 870'V [, 111.1110W..-4..°N,�6 ,oy a w-oe so.oaooe��o.e i • -4:- Y.:II 'I BUNK CanpensatIon Area I r rJ r d.' , ,.;.b _��\ 572Panrtrler Plana ,111 ,6. .' Bl O a .4. i7 a� /I , ' Budding n9 a D i.-7dVUA ,l 1\ ii Oap,,4�' 2 iitio rfg , 370 d Buie ng Perimeter Planting 00 I ', Md 5 Sinal Pekes to tt O tAAfwt.ompenealbnAraa k 4 O S 00 6 . BUFFER i ,obolt. — W COMPENSATION 5 ADDITIONAL I l ' _...1 AREA PALMS r ,"' ROYAL PALMS Al ENTRANCE There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this request. ID ilIZI April 20,2016 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Page 11 of 11 • • Deviation 9: LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a. (Use of Royal Palms as Canopy Trees for 100%Davis buffer) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.06.05.D.2.a. which states that Roystonea (aka Royal Palms) shall count one palm for one canopy tree and that palms may be substituted for up to 30-percent of required canopy trees with the exception that no more than 30-percent of canopy trees may be substituted by palms within each individual Type'D' road right-of-way landscape buffer, to instead allow Royal Palms as a substitution for 100% of the required canopy trees within the Davis Boulevard Type'D' road right-of-way buffer. Justification 9: The Porsche development is required to provide a 10-foot wide Type'D'landscape buffer along Davis Boulevard with trees spaced no more than 30-feet on-center per LDC Section 4.06.05.C.4.a. According to this section of code, the 304 linear feet of Davis Boulevard frontage requires 10 canopy trees. In addition, the Gateway Triangle Redevelopment overlay code requires "Parking Lot landscaping" to provide one tree or palm spaced 25-feet on- center as per Section 4.02.16.E.3.c.i. According to the overlay code for the"Parking Lot Landscaping,"the 304 linear feet of Davis frontage requires 13 trees or palms. The applicant is requesting a deviation from section 4.06.05.D.2.a. to allow the use of 100%Royal Palms, 13 total, in the Davis Boulevard road right-of-way landscape buffer. The Royal Palms will be installed with an overall height of 24' which is more than the code required 10'of clear trunk at the time of planting. The taller Royal Palms are an enhancement to the development that will provide a presence along Davis Boulevard. --.i.L__,, — _- -....„ , ,,,, oto � � I3 'Cff Ipt\ SW ! IA .+!, ,At P.' -- 4) Lata., „,10 ”::.--___ c,,,,. , n I - 9 OI® i.14 V'rif OIO' O't ! - tfe ptO O ''�' WI{t PAt{t1.,1 ii ltltR 1. Ste%- Galin HLF+H Iiktft{{4 lt� t7 srnxrla. 1�V;� a �-A : SHOWROOM 1 f" OffMR.WWS ' S ,.�^.' Hitt'At PAt, r:,"\11,7, l':I i �. iOlcl tit, 135 tl• 11 i ill. WI ,401 p W /—' I — „ma 1 s 17-1 let , ' ,,...... 1 ' 1 7\�iIrl\:r-il�ii'i\.1'!"1'i•.' i�Io.�""+i... i ._,. Yy..-..,..—.._...� l _ .»c..,.- -,.t : ...i_a..., _.,..r- ra_tai-i. - ... t7 �© The existing property has four(4)quality Royal Palms at the entrance that the applicant would like to utilize within the proposed Porsche project. In an effort to utilize these existing Royal Palms and provide a landscape plan that complemented the"Modern International" architecture style of the building, Royal Palms are being requested along the entire Davis Boulevard frontage and an additional four (4) Royal Palms are proposed at the two (2) access • connections to Terrae Avenue to the North. The use of the Royal Palms along both street frontages provides a cohesive appearance for the site. There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this request. Co frr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT LDC Section 10.02.03 F Ch. 6 I of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT: TT of Naples, Inc ADDRESS: 505 S. Flagler Dr. Suite 700 CITY West Palm Beach STATE FL ZIP 33401 TELEPHONE# 561 .655.8900 CELL# FAX# 561 .655.8114 E-MAIL ADDRESS: cmiller@amsinet.com C NAME OF AGENT: Kristina M. Johnson FIRM: J.R. Evans Engineering, P.A. ADDRESS: 9351 Corkscrew Road, Suite 102 CITY Estero STATE FL ZIP 33928 TELEPHONE# 239.405.9148 CELL# 239.285.6999 FAX# 239.288.2537 E-MAIL ADDRESS: kjohnson@jreeng.com CORRESPONDING SDP, SDPA,SIP INFORMATION This application shall be submitted in conjunction with one of the following: site development plan, site development plan amendment, or site improvement plan. PROJECT NAME/PL# IF KNOWN: PL 20150002617 PLANNER/PROJECT MANAGER, IF KNOWN: Dan Smith DATE OF SUBMITTAL OF SDP/SDPA/SIP: 1/7/2016 L 9/11/2014 Page 1 of 3 Attachment B Co -r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 INFORMATION REGARDING DEVIATION REQUESTS A site plan with deviations for redevelopment provides a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations (excluding height), architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings, structures, or site features nonconforming. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan, site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03. Except for the requested deviations,the site plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. In accordance with LDC section 10.02.03 F, "redevelopment" shall mean the renovation, restoration, or remodeling of a building or structure, or required infrastructure, in whole or in part, where the existing buildings,structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. DEVIATION REQUESTS The application must address the follow requirements. Please attach the required narratives and explanations. 1. A narrative of the redevelopment project and how it is consistent with the standards for approval, LDC section 10.02.03 F.7. 2. Description of each requested deviation and justification for each request. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition. The LDC section for which the deviation seeks relief from shall be identified. 3. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly identified on the site plan and explanation provided. 4. Deviation Request types: Zoning Deviation Requests-Check all that may be impacted by the request. ❑ Dimensional standards (excluding height): U Parking • Architectural • Landscape/Buffers ❑ Other site features: Engineering Deviation Requests-Check all that may be impacted by the request. ❑ Stormwater U Pathways 0 Transportation Planning ❑Other site features: r 9/11/2014 Page 2 of 3 99unty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Site Development Plan with Deviations for 9 ❑ ❑ Redevelopment Application Completed SDP/SDPA/SIP application and all associated materials, 9+ ❑ ❑ including all site plan documents. Copy for the Pre-Application Notes, if not submitted with 1 ❑ ❑ SDP/SDPA/SIP Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic Copy of all documents and plans on CD *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all 0 ❑ ❑ materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. +Unless waived by the Project Manager. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARNG PROCESS: • At the completion of the review process by County review staff,the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQUIREMENTS N Site Plan for Redevelopment:$1,000.00 i Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 $500.00 Credit for Pre-application meeting. All checks payable to:Board of County Commissioners The completed application,all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 9/11/2014 Page 3 of 3 Co er county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 A FFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) P' .201 5 0 0 0 2.6 1 Is Steve Terry (print name),as Assistant Secretary (title,if applicable)of T r of Naples,Inc (company,If applicable),swear or affirm under oath,that I am the (choose one)owner x applicant contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s)requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred,conveyed,sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize J.R.Evans Engineering,P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp.pres.or v.pres. • lithe applicant is a Limited Liability Company(L.L.C.)or Limited Company(LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's `Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • lithe applicant is a limited partnership,then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner"of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance,first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penaltieslof perjury,I declar, hat I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. I 1r ///7 7 Signature- , #J Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on 1 /!'1/ i (date) by (name of person providing oath or affirmation),as who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification)as identificationu P� .0,RY:eGc ELIZABETHOWENS efe) __-1 MYCOMMISSION f FF 907891 STAMP/SEAu i * EXPIRES:August 6,2019 Signature of Notary Public 4400 0, Bonded Dry Budget Notary Sankt: CP\08-00A-001151155 8/7/2015 Page 7 of 11 OWNER AFFIDAVIT Well, Steve Terry, TT of Naples,Inc being first duly sworn, depose and say that we/I am/are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief We/I understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted As property owner We/I further authorize J.R. Evans Engineering,P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this Petition. r Sign,ture of 'roperty Owner Signature of Property Owner Steve Terry, TT of Naples,Inc CTyped or Printed Name of Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � day of Ok....). , 20 fS by vet, u v•7 who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. State of Florida (Signature of Notary Public-State of Florida) County of Collier Notary Stamp 400 ::::;ka ELIZABETH OWENS MY COMMISSION#FF 907891 for EXPIRES:August 6,2019 'rlt, ncP Bonded Mu 8udgel Notary Swim Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 Pre-Application Meeting Sign-In Sheet PL#: Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Richard Anderson Environmental Specialist 252-2483 richardanderson@colliergov.net Li David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net ❑ Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net /Steve Baluch,P.E. Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch@colliergov.net C Laurie Beard Transportation Pathways 252-5782 Lauriebeard@colliergov.net ❑ Rachel Beasley Planner 252-8202 rachelbeasley@colliergov.net ❑ Marcus Berman County 5urveyor 252-6885 MarcusBerman@colliergov.net ❑ Madelin Bunster Architectural Review 252-8523 madelinbunster@coliiergov.net ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@colliergov.net ❑ George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst.County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov.net ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Site Plans Reviewer 252-2434 ericfey@colliergov.net XPaula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net ❑ Nancy Gundlach,AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@coliiergov.net ❑ Shar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org C John Houldsworth Engineering Services - 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net C Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@colliergov.net C Alicia Humphries Site Plans Reviewer/ROW 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net C Eric Johnson,AICP,CFM Zoning Services 252-2931 ericjohnson@colliergov.net ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net ❑ Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 - stevelenberger@colliergov.net ❑ Paulo Martins Utilities - 252-4285 paulomartins@colliergov.net Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net ❑ Jack McKenna,P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net Matt McLean,P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net 7 Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net • Stefanie Nawrocki Planning and Zoning 252-2313 StefanieNawrocki@colliergov.net Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree@colliergov.net ❑ Brandy Otero Transit _ 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net 99uny COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 Bill Pancake Fire Safety 252-2310 BillPancake@colliergov.net r. Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net ,(Fred Reischl,AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net Stacy Revay Transportation Pathways 252-5677 stacyrevay@colliergov.net Brett Rosenblum, P,E. Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net j Michael Sawyerr►6Serve� 4° 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net Cprby Schmidt,AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net Chris Scott,AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net X, Daniel Smith,AICP Landscape Review 252-4312 danielsmith@colliergov.net Ellen Summers Planning and Zoning 252-1032 EllenSummers@colliergov.net Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net X Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergov.net i_� Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net J David Weeks,AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net J Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email -.411- ►i ►45 j V�to S CA Y25- 93 amfilil, iJ o✓ netis,ma-,T.cm.-- f 1 --� �5y :..hos,''y Lk.+; , , N°.��e) z52,- .) /C. . �- ,,kr i —lir,/ n ✓•C 4-�P )7,Evi Si✓ (`+1g-•`7 Ill 1LLt-T'C. A,,,,viss 5fi-GS �'ye,,, G,-ri<< Luz k._ s ,,,,47-e-c.,„,, 41,TIAr k 3b il'i is) , SR- . ‘44414 c 41©S?Pit KT4FNnan) f?{yge EN c . COM. r .50 t.�. t l_G t c `‹___ 11/15-.I"._ Sal- 05St9 j 14.......1444. &ed.--Si A -F, Co w 1 rt rj'I�61,I d r J o,rsc LO f i li , oS. .}'�c*?9Fsel kgyr LWo rsc eN f J ?p vrwples.cdvi Colyer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 Pre-Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Site Plan with Deviations Date and Time: November 24, 2015 Assigned Planner: Daniel James Smith, AICP Engineering Manager(for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Porsche of Naples PL#: — - - Property ID#: 70720400101 Current Zoning: C-5 GTMUD- MXD OVERLAY Project Address: 3147 Davis Blvd. City: State: Zip: Applicant: Agent Name: Phone: Agent/Firm Address: City: State: Zip: Property Owner: Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed#of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: v. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Co r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 Meeting Notes (.riz-e Rev-re.A.A.) - IVPP s- -Fiz4r4b(ticf2zr-fd ttitWikkb.ht- - 496 /4). :p 4.4;1°it-TWA- t:zA;t1-4-Cr)Q.ei - Pesl zi.art4 Aet-CD •go,4E `-*J4er;-- tr-Nce.ifez. el-LAAD VIWAbgElvtarr Ktex.4413L4 fØr ;" -Lae*. 4. FA frtAgAtte'k Aa)ErtOkAt- Iv' A 41 cotbAtitt k- P /V ) 11; 4./go. 4•••• .111410 Befac :;7' -VD Ue'r144:--1? ( J :12 lie-L55- rtzd- 5_41tiffir— 4 /fc--`YLLIsa 014,47-imi P ENE- 412-L ke-c a I /A--Zok f ( 71/ if,44,9-7(a.A / tZ . 17<, / 5', 07 cfp 761t Z-PL. 1'i. , ' t 7 /14L/ ft-zit-6' 4- eLjIA- (1-4' PA-) /7 t; 71. " , 1 ri'--- 1)0z V 1J ei C c e-f av' I 74 11 -- (,L2.7/76.-.4"//i. i're c 7- ‘4, 11 /1 71-1) ap/3 4:7 /.C. ,ca v-ty 7,04 -1z) J e2{ J 1:%1Jc-rALT b-e3res tri I 4 E LLA-, ko w ko t--1 LI ‘i`JJItUQT IZZfid) 2f5,Vi PirtED- C . Ai 11.0t (43-37e13 i D • 1 -6 4 am-,.. try Cr- Rot "4"1" I 4j46(Al &56 Co yer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 Meeting Notes t IV/ t kir")S , Th--er H, Favzic-1-0 p r a►!_ tut t„ 1 �' ‘?o (e Th V(4-1-4,1) f9J�I h(01-- ef)bt%_. Se. .-per s. T,f LA * Ion c-I- /2a ,e#zma c. k cy. • Co. ler County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov,net (239)252-2400 SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT LDC Section 10.02.03 F Ch. 61 of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT: Porsche of Naples ADDRESS: 3147 Davis Blvd. CITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE# CELL# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS: NAME OF AGENT: FIRM: ADDRESS: CITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE# CELL# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS: CORRESPONDING SDP, SDPA, SIP INFORMATION This application shall be submitted in conjunction with one of the following: site development plan, site development plan amendment, or site improvement plan. PROJECT NAME/PL# IF KNOWN: PLANNER/PROJECT MANAGER, IF KNOWN: DATE OF SUBMITTAL OF SDP/SDPA/SIP: 9/11/2014 Page 1 of 3 Co e-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 INFORMATION REGARDING DEVIATION REQUESTS A site plan with deviations for redevelopment provides a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations (excluding height), architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings,structures,or site features nonconforming. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan, site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03.Except for the requested deviations,the site plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. In accordance with LDC section 10.02.03 F, "redevelopment" shall mean the renovation, restoration, or remodeling of a building or structure, or required infrastructure, in whole or in part, where the existing buildings,structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. DEVIATION REQUESTS The application must address the follow requirements. Please attach the required narratives and explanations. 1. A narrative of the redevelopment project and how it is consistent with the standards for approval, LDC section 10.02.03 F.7. 2. Description of each requested deviation and justification for each request. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition. The LDC section for which the deviation seeks relief from shall be identified. 3. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly identified on the site plan and explanation provided. 4. Deviation Request types: Zoning Deviation Requests-Check all that may be impacted by the request. U Dimensional standards(excluding height): U Parking U Architectural U Landscape/Buffers U Other site features: Engineering Deviation Requests-Check all that may be impacted by the request. • Stormwater U Pathways U Transportation Planning UOther site features: 9/11/2014 Page 2 of 3 Co 'er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED RED Completed Site Development Plan with Deviations for 9 u Redevelopment Application I� Completed SDP/SDPA/SIP application and all associated materials, 9+ including all site plan documents. 171—`�•` Copy for the Pre-Application Notes, if not submitted with SDP/SDPA/SIP 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 n Electronic Copy of all documents and plans on CD *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. +Unless waived by the Project Manager. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARNG PROCESS: • At the completion of the review process by County review staff,the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQUIREMENTS ❑ Site Plan for Redevelopment: $1,000.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials,and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 9/11/2014 Page 3 of 3 DfSt[ICt:Qt °I i i 'PENNY ., , ,, EMM TAYLOR ` �.' OM mss•: W. i , -.21#r#4-'' -'. Zoning: M:. C'S-'GTIMUD`-MXD Terrace A V"� t f over :y .,. *rt 150.0 .{ 0. iii 0 4- -� R 1 �. 1548 s t5 W ind Load '� Category 2: 3147 166 mph . a , ... m :tug lei,. , b r a a 0301 * „ f Ilif ' " i 44 `1'rfl so rt 1/4 . i.„ .,„,,,,,,,-7-- ''''" 1 114 406 40 411111-i•eg: ' - 4110 D _frit ,, ..,1074°4'''' 4".***..'""..""' _ f r }. .- IL .., kit, 7 MUCaw 3 TNIUD= 3 X50 f� Ex'p _ BMUC3: l'. . s r=te �� Co ler County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www,colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing©colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required, FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED, Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE(Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL(Blasting Permit) 0 SDP(Site Development Plan) ❑ BD(Boat Dock Extension) 0 SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit 0 SDPI(Insubstantial Change to SDP) • CU(Conditional Use) 0 SIP(Site Improvement Plan) • EXP(Excavation Permit) 0 SIPI(Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat 0 SNR(Street Name Change) ❑ LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) 0 SNC(Street Name Change—Unplatted) ❑ PNC(Project Name Change) 0 TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL(Plans&Plat Review) 0 VA(Variance) [] PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) 0 VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone 0 VRSFP(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) • RZ(Standard Rezone) ❑' OTHER Site Plans with Deviation Redevelopment LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description maybe attached) See attached 02-50-25 FOLIO(Property ID) NUMBER(s)of above(attach to, or associate with,legal description if more than one) 70720400101 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 3147 DAVIS BLVD • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME(if applicable) Porsche of Naples PROPOSED STREET NAMES(if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER(for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL# 20120000431 -SDPI PL20130001657 • it Coililer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents(if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: ©Q Email 0 Fax 0 Personally picked up Applicant Name: Christopher R. Mitchell , P.E Phone: (239) 682-2248 Email/Fax: cmitchell@jreeng,com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 70720400101 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: n. Date: 11118/15 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Porsche of Napes Legal Description ROCK CREEK PARK BLK A LOTS 20-28 AND LOTS 35-43 LESS E 15FT OF LOT 35, LESS THAT 8FT X 14FT PORTION AS DESC IN OR 4895 PG 2881 C 1 811412015 Cdlier County Property Appraiser • Collier County Property Appraiser mors a ,.tanc�c:c-„..i, vss_a0z�z--' aK�r'? u.r s r_ sNA.L I sno w I um** i tee tOF c¢0.r I ' 1SO ! 1 u i =Mil I ti ili,„„,,,..,„) X4(iN ItlA ° + ; *Introduction .. - ., s f• a , , 40 Search for Parcels by ' •F e Search Results Parcel JO:70720400101 (' y "[ t"( Name:TT OF NAPLES INC _ t k b 11 1 ---y lit _ > Stlaetal8 Name:3147 DAVIS BLVD i BYildil Unfts:A120.1 _ � � - r r`� ` r cam [[�_ ft �i Layers a, 41 Legend s * t Print10 ' 1 C i • 1 ; > •Home Page > = - I.Help c r r •ii i. � It- ^s _Jest.,-.. .,,,,, Win:. - ._ �vo ,-A. �.�..:�,•�i yam€' ,:,„ # 1q ,4 � ytt'.. w . sr 2r , 1 '' 'i r�r s..�iia: . is ' .. } -R 1 '' _ •sem r* .. hen,Phatepiephy Jenuar,Uraan-2015-Paco'.20,4 Location Map for Porsche of Naples - property highlighted http.//www. 1/1 • A • F. Site plan with deviations,for redevelopment projects. 1. Purpose. A site plan with deviations shall provide a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations,excluding height,architectural deviations,and deviations from site features,such as but not limited to, landscaping,parking,and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings,structures or site features nonconforming. 2. Applicability. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan,site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03.Except for the requested deviations,the site development plan or site improvement plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. For purposes of this section, "Redevelopment" shall mean the renovation,restoration,or remodeling of a building or structure,or required infrastructure,in whole or in part,where the existing buildings,structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. 3. Application. The Administrative Code shall establish the process and submittal requirements for a site plan with deviations for redevelopment projects application. a. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall also be clearly stated. b. Projects subject to the provisions of LDC section 5.05.08 shall submit architectural drawings that are signed and sealed by a licensed architect registered in the State of Florida. c. The site construction plans shall be signed and sealed by the applicant's professional engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Florida. d. The landscaping plans shall be signed and sealed by the applicant's landscape architect, registered in the State of Florida. e. The survey shall be signed and sealed by the applicant's professional surveyor and mapper, registered in the State of Florida. 4. Staff review and recommendation. Based upon evaluation of the factors set forth in LDC section 10.02.03.F.8,County Staff shall prepare a report containing their review findings and a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions,or denial. 5. Public notice. Public notice of the hearing shall be as required by the LDC section 10.03.06 Q and Chapter 6 of the Administrative Code. 6. Public hearing. The Hearing Examiner shall hold at least one public quasi-judicial hearing to review the proposed site plan with deviations. a. Review. The Hearing Examiner shall hear the petition following receipt of the staff report and application by the Office of the Hearing Examiner.At the public hearing, the Hearing C Examiner shall consider the applicant's justification for the requested deviations,the staff report.the standards of approval and any other relevant testimony and evidence. b. Decision, The Hearing Examiner shall render a decision to approve,approve with conditions, or deny the requested deviations within 30 days of the public hearing. If approved,or approved with conditions,the decision shall specifically note the deviations and the basis for their approval.A decision by the Hearing Examiner shall be rendered prior to the issuance of the approval letter by the County Manager or designee for the site plan. 7. Standards for approval. The petition shall be reviewed for consistency with the following standards: a. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose. e. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities,recreation areas,sizes and yards,architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities,sight distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. f. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district.The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. h. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. J• Approval of the deviation will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. S. Trtneframe. Time limits for site plans will be pursuant to LDC section 10.02.03 H. J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Deviation 1: (Multiple Access Points Along Single Frontage) The applicant seeks relief from Resolution 13—257(adopted Access Management Policy, as may be amended), Section 3.09.2.1 which requires no more than one connection per road frontage,to instead allow three(3)driveway connections to Terrace Avenue. Justification 1: The applicant is proposing a Porsche Dealership with a sales center, automotive servicing center, and vehicular storage garage. The different service areas have different levels of access including the general public, sales staff, maintenance staff, and lastly automotive shipping trucks. In order for the site plan to properly function to meet the needs of the dealership the applicant is requesting three (3) driveway connections to Terrace Avenue. Currently the property has two (2) driveway connections to Terrace Avenue that the applicant wishes to retain as well as request one(1) additional driveway connection as seen in the accompanying Site Plan. Deviation 2: (Allow Minimum throat length of 30 feet) The applicant seeks relief from Construction Standards Handbook for work Within the Public Right-of--way , Collier County, Section 111.C.6.b.(2)which requires a minimum throat length of 50 feet,to instead allow for minimum length of 30 feet. Justification 2: Deviation 3: (Allow Minimum measured length of 30 feet from edge of pavement) The applicant seeks relief from Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right-of-Way, Collier County, Section III.C.6.c.(3) which requires that commercial gates provide a minimum throat length of 30 feet, measured from the right-of-way line to the face of the gate, to instead allow for a minimum length of 30 feet to be measured from the nearest edge of pavement of the roadway to the face of the gate. Justification 3: Deviation 4: (Allow 144 S.F.spaced aluminum panel) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.8 which requires that Blank walls must not exceed 20' horizontal or 10' vertical. Joints must be decorative and spaced less than 120 s.f, to instead allow utilizing Porsche"floating cap", which is a single plane of aluminum panel, with reveals every 144 s.f. Justification 4: This design is mandated/required by Porsche Corporate.Generally,an automotive dealership would not have glazing on secondary facades, but glazing has been added above the Porsche prototype to offset the blank walls, on other facades. Deviation 5: (Allow Terrace Avenue facade to have less than 30%glazing) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.2.c.ii which requires having primary facades of 30% glazing, to instead allow 16%glazing. Justification 5: An automotive dealership consists of Sales and Service functions. Generally a Service Shop is behind the Showroom, and does not have as much glazing because it is an interior-focused work environment. In this case, our Shop is a primary façade, so we have provided more glazing than would be traditionally seen on a Service Shop, however there is not enough wall space to accomplish all the access points, glazing, and still provide for structural shear walls on this site(which is in a hurricane zone). J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD, STE. 102/ESTERO, FL 33928 1 239.405.9148 (p)/239.288.2537(f) WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM Date Page 2 of 2 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Deviation 6: (Allow additional roof change greater than 100 feet) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i which requires providing additional roof every 100 linear foot,to instead allow two curves having approximately 125 feet and 118 feet. Justification 6: This design is mandated/required by Porsche Corporate. The façade facing Davis Boulevard utilizes the Porsche 'floating cap," which is a continuous curve which wraps the Service Drive, Showroom and New Vehicle Delivery. It has an uninterrupted roofline, other than the glazing "slot" at the front entry, which splits the metal panels into two curves. There is no change in parapet height until the curve breaks at the Service Shop. The two curves are approximately 125' and 118'. Because the wall is curved, a person would not see an uninterrupted linear material all at once. From a street perspective,the curved wall would appear less than 100'. Deviation 7: (Using Colors or Materials above a level 8 saturation of more than 10%of a facade) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i which states to use colors or Materials above level 8 saturations is limited to no more than 10% of a facade, to instead allow in all portion of building apart from Showroom or Customer area. Justification 7: The use of the black acts as a neutral backdrop to allow the silver panels on the Showroom to be the prominent design feature. This is durable material, which is required for a building on a tight site, with vehicles driving close to the building throughout the day. Deviation 8: (Using Metal or Corrugated panels more than 33%of the facade area) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c which requires Metal or corrugated panels are limited to no more than 33%of the façade area,to instead allow more than 33%of the facade area. Justification 8: This design is mandated I required by Porsche Corporate. The use of the black acts as a neutral backdrop to allow the silver panels on the Showroom to be the prominent design feature. The product is a high-end metal siding,and is not reflective of a stereotypical"metal building." Deviation 9: (Allow windows to have 8'above sidewalk grade) The applicant seeks relief from Bayshore Gateway Triangle D.8.d.ii which requires windows shall be located between 2 and 7 feet above sidewalk grade,to instead allow sidewalk grade to 8'above sidewalk grade. Justification 9: The glazing design is intended to allow visibility of the product being sold. Porsches are low to the ground, and a 2' knee wall would essentially block most of the visibility of the vehicle.The 8' height is set by the panel sizes,to complement the proportion of the metal panels above in even increments. Deviation 10: (Foundation planting not to be provided) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.E.4 which requires foundation planting at building perimeter,to instead allow not to provide foundation plantings. Justification 10: As with the glazing requirement above,foundation plantings effectively block the main area of display for a vehicle, which is low to the ground. Additionally,to accommodate the front plaza requirement,we have limited area to provide plantings and sidewalk. To offset the lack of foundation plantings,we propose to add larger trees to the site, 18'overall height(10' is the requirement).We will also provide 1,640 sf of flowering shrubs as a buffer on Davis Blvd. J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD, STE. 102/ESTERO, FL 33928/239.405.9148(p)/239.288.2537(f) WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM y: . } t 10 ~j �R of iiiiiiF ji/:1, t, o 17 • o i I,Ist. . '' j I. d 1 411 i11 1. 42 s, r e 1 , --- r° , (I ;�, 0 i i -A.--. ;'5 ' i • r ti , t°/Ce : , ;,'It;t • • • • 4 „� w ,. kx S jf .� _ } .`-Y✓6.. _Jac'' ., f . , , . .., .... , , : :,.• ., . - ',."1:.;,..,-.1: --If------' i:' . - --;',--7-7,--;i, ---,:';t4s; '..is---tit,,,-tt;.;',-,' :,‘-',' , ., _ 1 , fitl__ ';--_-,i,-,,,___,--.:-...: ',<-----:.....4.-_ ,-/--,..-,* . :- ---,,-• --7_..- --.0;*,--, ,,..: , - ,,___ .- ., rn ... ' ' ' : 2' 40i) P° . 1 _ .1._•;:,.. .., h, ,._ ......„•,___._._7_,„, • ..„ -. ___ ,...__......:•,. ....,...,:. ,*.‘ 0.--- .. .--,-4. _....._,-...r., __,._,-.. --____.,;:-.-- ,. _ . . . , . -‘, ' i -... .. :--- '-'--1:4,.- .'';---;;r•'1•:'.') ''', !X.rfc'r' IP k, • , I..3., `,;•,‘,. 1,. I - -',,g,-;-•,, ,-,,i- -,,,,,, - - -----=„1,-7,', „,„ ---- =AF'' ,;-• , --..;''I.- :,,--' ;:-'.1 , . .*---. !'•-•.: itll ---7::-L..---,-,,,-- - _--t - • t;,,...? .-'• - - .. -. ... „: • , ' 1 I'f _.41fi 11,v . .. . _ -' 4 ., • • t ,. ,-,::4,,,,;:i'SF-:"3,, . , !Iiil - . . ..,„, „ . ,.. .. ,. ........„...,,_. ---- -- 7-4''-''' -71--,,-;'''''---.:::,--52-;; _ ..... . _. . ., , .. . ... . - 4 , N ,: --------- f44,- - t. ,4 , • , • -• , .-- 4 -44i4„- ., • . -, • -' „,-.. . . .. . .4-- - . , . ... , . , . .. . , . . .. t, .,t• -::„, : -. ; '4." f-t'ilig. . • -'); ;4 , . • ''' . t • .. .. ... . • i . . . 1 . 1 I 1 !4' Ir i I I ,'',i ;I : ;;,;:s.:-,::,,;',;',1,,:;;;:i 1. . ;;'—'4.1.•,..",-, .; ,„; , I I I , - -; . . ... 1 I I . 1 ,,4, I II :•;;;l7it");;;;rs -el-, ". . , 1 II 1 I i ; t ii, i i I i . 1 / 1 • . i i . i . ........„,, , I i j / , .,.... ,. <=.1.- . A ''i , , _ ,, ........- . , - •.; '; ' ''.1 .. -2::-'''- • 7.- __,,,, 1.,,=.4_'' "•,, ' 411 bT, = — /". (°4"ii „ .. '':..'-'-...,_,---..,:,''' ',:'. '''.' - ''''''':1,,,,;”,', t tir 4 , ,..„, ..,:::,, a...,„„-,a- --' ...,..,...,:::::-,""....„ i., iz • • 1 s i. i II 1 i i i i i i `[ 1 4 10F It * 7r�ltPl4 h171J ,, ,, *'''' Oi al #fit/// 1 1 1 ..,, - 41# /041k ;..' INIENA1 ,.. ., i ;" Mait'''""-ti•- i.,-,-;,-,.-::-.. ,,..-__,„ -. ...,„... \ 1 1 , . r. . • V , .....- • - ql .,1 4 , II \ I \ i 1. . - - ,. , - ,,.. r''.. r . , .. . ; ... .. . . , . . . .., -.. ? 1 I.b4/11:' ; i, . , ii H ' , 1 , , , ., I, ' -',, iiii ! ll II 11 ' ' II ' 1 l'i' ' ' ' ' 1 ' 1 i 11 11 111 I I . I , ,I , I . . .. HH , 1 . , i ,. .. I`., 11 1 ; 0 ,.., . , 1 il 1 . . I , I 1 ; ; 411 1 , ., ‘ . ; ; ; ; H .. , ; ; . ! -, ;;;.. .. - pi , 1 , III 11-,,, .i'.. , ,, , , : i I 1 1 , 1 . , ; , . ,..: ,,,i,,,, , , , , 1 1 111 , i ,, , ! I .; "., ,.,, -,...71 , 1 , , ,, , , , , , ,,-,,, iu, ..„. , , , , , i ,„ , L,. ., ,i ,,,1=1, .:,''-'• ,':'4, lji-1 . 1 1 : i 1 I i 1 I 11 ill III I , ', . :',.';'1i;',11' ' , 1 `. . . 1 , ', I [11 , 1 .4 1 U l' % •. i . ' ' ' 1 , ' ' ll 1 I 1 li I l'' l: : '''.4ii '. ' ' ., .1 ' it. s ._111 I , ! 1 ' I 1 ' . r;'1'1! ' ' . . - t ' ' ' I 1: : ' ' ' ', ' ' : .'..: ' ' i i I 1111 , } I e er.i. - .., I I [ ' 1 1 - i ._-:,74- .. ',..•..z.,., , , i , ' 11 ,,;14.' , ,1 i 1 111111111 , 11; , ;!. , , H 1 1 1111 1 i I i 1 IIi 1 ' i ' 1 1 1 1 i I I 1 , =NMI — / it ; I ` ,,. , 1 , i - 1 i I1 ' ' 1 11 11 1 11 11111 ' 1 ill 1 1 = , 1 , 1 I 1 1111111 , , 11 il . .. , . 1 , , 1 , , ,, ,, 1 , , . , , , II II IIIIII ; I . ; 1 1 III 1 I ; ; ' /I. . ' ; ; t I I III' i illt III ; 1 ;, ; • t ; ..'./4 //I/1 :24 . I . II It / -IF , — 1 t ' I , . : ' ', ' ' , •* 11 i I i 111 ' 1 1 1 11 ' 1 11 ' -,!..1:-,-"`;--:',...--.------;- '''..' t;,''''.. '''',-:---":-.------- - it4'-,'' ' ' '. , 1r ' i: !'1,..„,„_, - - -"' ,,,y.---..5:4- •,I, i.,, 1 1 1 I ' ' ' ! , • ' , ,I - . , 1 1 : 1 ' 1 1 I ' . : 1 i 1 , ' I I 1 ! I''.T I • t 3 , .111 i 1 , 3 i 3 3 I , Oen: iit ,mil ' . ' ' ii I 1 . li '411i . .,=, 11 3" 4 1 3 il 1 I 3 .. 4 3 Iii,i1313.4 , 1 1 1 i IP 3 1 3 31 I 3 1 4 ' I i i 31 . . 3 t 1 . . t , 43 31 1 1 i , i ' II 1 1 1 1 , '• , , 1, i . 1 i. -I. 1111 I 1 1 11 , , I I ft fi tt- .40 4 - '' .w "of," . . 3 dir it 4*4 1 k I i y fill' • - • C� �:11, j, : �q•�� - Iris J `\ 1. .li:� 1 *; st� ._ P.,. . S i µ,4' a'- , \1... yKx't 7 # ,,, ...,5, , -. .,, 5-11-.;,"'TT:*1.-'ill'2 ` � � I 't,2':::-.-:;=. 7i k .0 ,. / 2 / ' . , ri t a �� C -- x, ,:; �' _ ' < it '; � �� J 5 x + r i ,^�.. 7 �' .' .... 4L/- 2. i ) � »» 0 \ \ \ } i \ ~ tt \ . y . . I .'® ^ ® \ �� } � \ . . ,. \)1q1 § . :x &»«« <yd Sw>m>w \ `w gq§q\) ( .y? < . . \ \ ƒ$I / \,� . < \ d� ,} Z m"lf;I //////1://1////////1/ § 9 / /\ ;ld\// . i } /% � 1` y. ~ « :\m mttil t .. ° \ < v ) ~. « \ .. -.-I ( , \ } -r 440 ,., ..,..,..,„ , ,,_.,......;.,,,„.....,...........,_. . ,,,,,,,,,...,,,,,,, .... ........,..„,,,,. ._ ....„....T..t.,.,,,_.,,..., . . . . . . q wy ,. . «. } q « 2 . . . . . ; a. . . 1. \i } \ /. / . . / | } \: ^ I w f + » , e t . : y\ § . : + °z . «. , . � , . , a - . . §y »y! » \ . y \ ( f ;• • \ T - • \ am a \.^\ \\ 9y , y \2 . \ } \ / } } \ ( { } < . . .. . } : . . . . \ L ' -.' •t• / \ \ , 5 > . . f . � « �: :. ,d \ .. .. . I \ ( 1 , \ • . - | ` . . . 1. # © • y w . « ' . 1 ,i § \ \ � . ! 't-ii � \\ \ :\ �\\ ! s I§ } ` ! . 1t. ' ; > xe. l . . , \ y ' . . { < \ .'` — x . « . > tt , . : : � � � » 2 � : � : \ ` 4 ~ \ \ } :. } . . ! ° : < : . * i . . . s:2: . .- . \\ \ \ \ \ & : »;/ -, A! § , /. y»® w a y : i , y. y i t 1 , ' t i ® AI 1 e ., --'' • -fes ,z,,,/ , 4!•‘ _ . I . .:44...I,., II " d3 M �t rr R i i 3 � NYAe ain�w wnsaK wr vm\roiissv resat rno ioowuwlai a�w�umx�v✓�n�au,a0�w�an�c a xcin-as rrc cwwnw�nmran VmM��iaa r i . ♦ • . 'j'1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Ni ; i r� 9 .i . ta....- ,. z ......0 , m.. ,, i „. : iy II 5 m H _/ O" I a c AEi� V 9 D I i I I I _ II I _._ I I .. \ L r.....giX I I i i i g5_ I I II / , 1I e r iii :- b 6 mer o QQ i m -6b m. 1 I , m. F ,� rh m ),I u „....tt g a $ E 8 . „Aim x F I I pill ___ I s g h :i >y I gra 1.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. /I PIM�$r,. PUN eEvi9orvs m f Q PORSCHE OF NAPLES 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD,SUITE 102 No PHONE:FLORIDA 33928 (239)405-9108 g FAX:(239)288-2537 R. a g-x e WWW REVAFL NSEN IINff�ING.COM OPEN SPACE COMPARISON EXHIBIT r ^n R n, F /M • tal INN r ' • k _ „ 4 11 yf� r ^ C •� ,• • • C • j, C -'- '\.N':- 1 1 �- -.: Cr• .v :... tr • i 91lIIU,1141 1 IIII 11111111 ur� ■ ■ !r!,!i_N,,r1i. T '' �� .. # llir :/ iliji mil II • 0 +t= ..s C C rti15 ;."'Sua' 6 4 .. 11 3 _ — C • t - „ • I , • „410144 tt, ;11 • - • "" C •-_ —swat • • C • 1111111 "IA • 0 A C _ . _ • - • _ - :.,. • _ . - . .• 1 C ..sir.► 0 l. 0 } n; 'ksf _ �da _ r �' yam.... _ 3 LL I i��,,,�;•S't: rte-ia`,& '+r. C Reynobond Reynolux I I 23 Colorvvolcw 500 Architectural Finishes The colors of Reynononc` anc Reynolux`; with the industry's first 30-year finish warranty C ALCOA excellence in innovation Reyn000nc & Roynolux stancarc architectural finishes Reynobond Aluminum Composite Material and Reynolux metal wall panels and flat sheet are protected and colored with enhanced, high-performance Colorweld®500 coatings—allowing for color matching between products. These finishes feature 70% Kynar 500®/Hylar 5000® polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) resins with Fluoropolymer technology, coil coated to ensure the highest color uniformity and quality. They provide excellent flexibility and film adhesion for forming and offer superior resistance to humidity, impact, salt spray, pollution and abrasion. With a 30-year finish warranty, Colorweld 500 coatings exhibit outstanding color and gloss retention and improved hardness and durability, and they are considered the premier architectural coatings for metal. Colowvec`F 500 SERIES ONE Standard Finishes All Reynobond colors are stocked in 62'-wide coil.Ask about 50"-wide coil availability. Call for availability of matching Reynolux colors in 0.040"x 48" widths.Other gauges and widths available upon request with minimum quantities and charges. For other Reynolux industry Pure White* Bone White' Frisco White' Oyster White" standard"non-stocking"colors, check for availability. Castle Grey` Pueblo Tan" Cadet Grey' Classic Green` C Konig Blue` Brite Red' Classic Bronze Deep Black Colorwolc 500 SERIES TWO Premium Mica Finishes Series Two anodic colors are si , formulated to closely resemble popular anodized colors used on curtain wall profiles.Certain colors are gauge and width specific. When estimating, fabricating and erecting, the appearance of a Pewter Platinum' Silversmith' Vancouver opper• mica paint finish may vary according to the 1111 direction from which it is viewed.For color consistency,it is best to order all material required at one time and in the same width. Anodic Clear' Anodic Satin* Anodic Bronze` Colorwelc 500XL SERIES THREE . ri Premium Metallic Finishes x he xxa € When estimating, � t fabricating and erecting, ',,het 4Vat theappearance of a metallpaint finish may vary according to the ,rte= 4111 direction from which it • is viewed.For color consistency,itis best Bright Silver Metallic' Champagne Metallic' Copper Penny" Titanium' to order all material required at one time and in the same width. Opaque Finishes:These 2-coat finishes typically consist of a 0.2 mil primer and a 0.8 mil color coat, for a nominal dry film thickness of 1.0 mil. Mica Finishes:These 2-coat finishes typically consist of a 0.2 mil primer and a 0.8 mil color coat with mica flakes suspended in the finish, for a nominal dry film thickness of 1.0 mil. Metallic Finishes:These 3-coat finishes typically consist of a 0.2 mil primer, a 0.8 mil color '` - coat and a 0.5 mil clear top coat, for a nominal dry film thickness of 1.5 mils. Colors and patterns shown are as close to actual colors as possible within the limitations of commercial printing reproduction. Please consult your Alcoa Architectural Products Representative for product samples. *Environment-friendly cool-pigment finish. 1 Paint Finish Performance Property Test Method Opaque Mica Metallic Specular Gloss(60%) ASTM D523 25-35 25-35 25-35 Pencil Hardness ASTM D3363 F-2H F-2H F-2H Flexibility(T-bend) ASTM D4145 0-2 T-bend; No pick off 0-2 T-bend; No pick off 0-2 T-bend; No pick off Reverse Impact ASTM D2794 No cracking or No cracking or No cracking or adhesion loss adhesion loss adhesion loss Salt Spray Resistance ASTM B117 Passes 4000 hrs Passes 4000 hrs Passes 4000 hrs 5%Salt Fog @95°F Humidity Resistance ASTM D2247 Passes 4000 hrs Passes 4000 hrs Passes 4000 hrs 100%RH @ 95°F Color Retention ASTM D2244 Max 5 fade Max 5 fade Max 5 fade . 10 yrs @ 45°, South Ronda Chalk Resistance ASTM D4214 Max 8 chalk Max 8 chalk Max 8 chalk 10 yrs @ 45°, South Ronda Colorweld®500 standard,Colorweld®500 Mica and Colorweld®500XL Metallic coatings exceed AAMA 2605 performance requirements. All coatings are thoroughly tested and backed by the strength and integrity of Alcoa.Alcoa Architectural Products Colorweld 500 and Colorweld 500XL coatings come with a 30-year finish warranty. Please consult factory for warranty information. It is extremely important to note that all mica and metallic finishes exhibit coil-coating grain flow and paint directionality.This is a result of the coil-coating process and the inherent optical diffusion and reflection caused by the mica and metallic flakes in the paint. A consistent panel layout, relative to the directional arrows on the protective film of each Reynobond®panel, must be taken into consideration during design,fabrication and installation. 0 Irradiative Readings Colorweld 500 SRVt SRI-Ft LRVttt Colorweld 500(Mica) SRVt SRItt LRVttt Pure White 68.1 81 75 Pewter 19.3 15 21 Bone White 68.2 82 75 Platinum 51.8 58 54 Frisco White 69 83 75 Silversmith 50.2 57 31.6 Oyster White 63 74 67 Vancouver Copper 37.1 39 30 Castle Grey 48.1 54 41 Anodic Clear 56 65 54 Pueblo Tan 51.1 58 48 Anodic Satin 49.6 57 40 Cadet Grey 33.3 35 35 Anodic Bronze 35.2 38 22 Classic Green 27 25 9 Colorweld 500XL(Metallic) Konig Blue 32.2 32 9 Bright Silver Metallic 70.6 80 64 Brite Red 34.8 35 9 Champagne Metallic 52.8 53 53 Classic Bronze 9 3 6 Copper Penny 39 41 27 Deep Black 4.5 0 5 Titanium 51.1 51 31.7 tSolar Reflectivity Value(SRV) ttSolar Reflective Index(SRI) ttt Light Reflectance Value(LRV) Colorweld is a registered trademark of Alcoa Architectural Products.Kynar 500®is a registered trademark of Arkema Group. Hylar 5000®is a registered trademark of Solvay Solexis.Colors and patterns shown are as close to actual colors as possible From responsible within the limitations of commercial printing reproduction.This publication is based on the latest data available at the time of FSC sMlx ources printing.Due to product changes,improvements and other factors,Alcoa reserves the right to change or withdraw information , FSC•0006249 contained herein without prior notice.Contact Alcoa Architectural Products for material samples. Availability subject to change. For more information, availability and Design Line product Alcoa Architectural Products offerings, visit website or contact your Alcoa Architectural Products representative. 50 Industrial Boulevard Eastman,GA 31023-4129 Tel.800 841 7774 Oreynobond.com or reynolux.com ALCOA 02012 Alcoa Architectural Products.Reynobond®and Reynolux®are registered trademarks of Alcoa Inc. AAP-0555-Rev.January 2012 ver.1.0 20000 MIIIMISMw • DIVISION 7 9 2012 FABRALSILHOUETTE HCF SERIESTM BRIEF PRODUCT SPECIFICATION s { �+ t T4 r... rya -- i E I ,— College Park Elementary School,Virgina Beach VA,USA "For the design of this elementary school project, we needed to visually break1::"------------..': --`"" up the facade. The HCF Series gave us more color options and the flexibility to integrate color in the design." "� Clay Dills,Dills Architects ` . CONCEALED FASTENER WALL PANEL FAB RAL SILHOUETTE HCF SERIESTM LORI Fabral®Silhouette HCF SeriesTM, a horizontal concealed fastener system, You challenge us. provides a range of profiles and configurations for architectural, commercial And we like it. and industrial applications. With options of one to four ribs and multiple profiles, Your vision for a building architects and designers have at their disposal the ultimate in design versatility and what you want to in a strong, durable wall panel. An interlocking sidelap feature hides fasteners achieve makes us think harder. It'd be easy to and is installed with or without clips to allow for thermal movement. say - That won't work. Instead we go with- Let's see what we can do. Fabral.com 800.884.4484 9 1- 8 L ' 1111 C12-1m 12-1C 12-2 12-2C 12-3 12-3C 16-1 16-1C 16-2 16-2(F:1 16-4 6-4C ' --- -r on reverse) 1 1 FABRAL A BMW DIVISION 7 9 2012 FABRAL SILHOUETTE HCF SERIESTM BRIEF PRODUCT SPECIFICATION MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION • Fabral®,308 Alabama Blvd, Jackson, GA 30233 • Telephone: 800.884.4484 • Email: sales@fabral.com • Website: www.fabral.com PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Acceptable Product: Fabral® HCF Horizontal Wall Panel Air Infiltration: ASTM E283 0.01 cfm/ft2@ 20 psf Water Penetration: ASTM E331 No water leakage @ 20 psf Structural Performance: ASTM E330 WIND UPLIFT LOAD TABLE (PSF) Substrate Spans 2'-0" 2'-6" 3'-0" 3'-6" 4'-0" 24 ga. Steel 3 54 48 43 38 33 22 ga. Steel 3 60 53 48 42 37 .032"alum. 3 48 42 36 30 24 DESIGN INFORMATION • Purlin Spacing: Maximum—4'on-center • Field Curving: Minimum radius 200' • Panel Length: Maximum-20' • Panel Width: 12", 16" PRODUCT INSTALLATION Install panels plumb, level and straight so it is watertight and without waves or other distortions,allowing for thermal movement considerations.Apply sealant tape or caulking as necessary at flashing and panel joints to prevent water penetration. PRODUCT MAINTENANCE AND WARRANTY Fabral®provides a 20 year paint-finish warranty for cracking,chipping, peeling,fading and chalking—providing confidence in a long- lasting application. To ensure the durability of your Silhouette HCF panels, use proper care. Remove filings,grease,stains, marks or excess sealants from roof panels system to prevent staining.Store panels and flashings in a safe,dry environment. RECENT PROJECTS TO REFERENCE Segment Project Name Location Quantity Architect/Distributor Healthcare Hand and Microsurgery Associates Columbus, OH Trinity Healthcare Group Office Building Landmark Office Building Wake Forest, NC N.B. Handy Co Education Georgia Tech CNES Lab Austell, GA 95 sq Abrams Architectural Products, Inc. Education Lebanon Middle School Lebanon, NH 161 sq Palace Construction, Inc. S98-32-418 1 �m ...,„.. .,. ,, Reynobond® „..:,..... ...,.. ..,„ Architecture -'` -., � - IN , , . , .., - .... . : , , , . i . , ..„ , ,, . ... .., ...,__ ,. ,... . ..,, , ...,.......... ..., _,.____ ., ,4 ..,„... ., ....„ . ,.. ) i ,::,,,,„...i..., ...,..: ,,,,,k.,,, , ..-..i.-,.-.. i „,...„..„:„..„,...,........ _ „:::::::,,i,,,,,,,i , ., _ a ,-- 4 Aluminum Composite Vatehal C ALGA Dedicated to your Success . . ....; .: .--.... C --` - - • 1 — , - •-, _____,... - ,, - , . , ...., it. 4 1 , , .4 4 ,- , • -,,- _ ....- _:,...- „ /, .........._. i . . • /:,,E 1/...:/,..:: 11 It, fi.;ii/4„/ .. ,:07,1if,;,_ I , JI , , r _ . ' ,, ,,: . __. - ,.,.-. ....•• -; V .• , , win ttialimElm -- - • - t ' . 4111 r- f..'-"/': / ', I.,' IIII i . --ill . .. „• ' ____ ....., ,, 0 _ •2.:. - •,,,-4..:'.7--mniii, ;,-.---', ' . . . ,..,?,.• _ ,-.... . v. 116 1 V.71 14. _IL_ \*•7 ...N. 1 4 , ,. ---.........-- 7 --,-- --- 'el ., _I___1.... ___ I_____.• 4 ,...- • 0 --' k 1 c 0 vi a) . § ci 8_ '5 2 0 G) 0 0 cti E 5 _2 :3 .8 .E 6 a E D 4g 80- E▪ — ° (i) E 6 c E i 0 0 o) , 8, 2 0 a., 0 E g .c 0 ; i E 2 ° .g o .2 .,..,1 c°' cc (...) tc E jr 2 : ,E7,- (i' c,;)• ; b. Q .c gLobTa5722 88C . 8 ›- ,.. ro 8 a S 12 g '-‘ -sit) 08 0 -ac, ›.. 2 2 T..) 2 y >, -0 in' a) ui ,.9 p, — fl ooca — 2 .- El .f., -.5 9 .0 2 ._ . '88 ..?• Rz, 8c, .,L, 0 ,01F- 12 > .c03 .a .0 't 08-. 7 , 0.) -0 -E -52.. u 'a §. ,8 8 §) zccD n n ' n — -8 P. c>" 15 2 '8 >' 0 `,'al -g F .8 0) -3- g, .-cn• 8) Po 6: =a)o •, E 2 t 8 8, ' -2 -8 5, -8 '2 " -8 .-F= ti- . t.U T? 1Z> . 2 a) -0 _§ z 2 -1' =50 2, Cc' z--• _0' ; E :Z C 0 8 .. .2 , c • ...., CC 0 •') F.; °, §, ig t E 2 0,: Y 2. 20. E g -g §, * c, . ° .c. 2 e2 E 4) 13 -2 0 S 73 .8 ° -c -i t . C 1 .., , } r c sL ip) m O N 2 c S > p Q NpL NN tiitfl ° m• I E !, aCH Ot0wy T aU C OE co zoo L° cm ° • 8- ocv@EmEwc U i ; 4 iioin ' EEo. c a mco -2-' f3 ° • • •Ikt. ____ ,, g 0 i �r t — 411111110114 :;/ el ILI: y o > E 11111 ! a Q °8a o « cY Tm a N O g O C O; U • O pOC O OO w m Ep U Eo0 L 'Q F o onc - mm 52 y ms g 'a U U §. C Q / 0 .2) > LCOOCpy O 7t0 .TAN y .m L O ? m O ? $ rc ii SLLa d m a> x U;' 'c 2 g Nai ° E N . E ° y " ° p tin" m .(a cE i s mL a '-2 - ' aC y ▪ C _ OJ ( Lt' N ,, NOO E c C om > m aN 7) ONiHr - N .gO)\ 4—' x �' o 5E8 oS Y m m m (7) FL 3 _ O C F- m o UQ co 0 O c n m c a c o £ E 2 O0 _0 COO T CO 2 E 2 E > W O O T .V...' O _ 5) 3 L oa > C ° _ m U O O >z -- -,5 ° =6 d > m U 8 } 1 • 3 4 i >v r t " Al i 1 I -== ti \\1\ ------- ----------- \ "----------.____.----------------____:_...._____ ----- * i0 10. . N T L il c 1 ig as CO (` 2 12 &NZ. a a 0 o 2 8 Cf.) N a � •C7-) m co m O a U4 0 pv _ C L O N d, Aa) N O cU CL ON m � ° gN C N N < nNm o 4LO ,no T. Ua N° m 'O U N5 c c C0 aO N C E3 N CN c LY g E °' E ° 8 0 O CI)Lg Q c s N t rnro E o o N _m g- .1 XE Q'y wE a 0 , (n a3 NO> E m C 7 E N-I---' '° asC d 7 d2' na ° m EaQ E E Z d 2 m m A o• 9 N C° aOof y 4:3y N N N N 0 • aC1- Uy U O N ° • 2 2 a 0 iN 7 �. wYn0 mHi ! o _ ° (, i o Eac d a ° aOO s . N _ nm 9Eum f T W , O a ° -c 4 L 2.O E .o L °)2N cUwOE ycEc c oCN— m TN `0 caa 'Pc > CNO v aicc a , c C N C ? c d ° N ag .c pw &N o C O f N U0 a 2 -22 . - -8° C = N . in O/, a C ° N cdLm ' maa ° oC ) 20L0C m ° � ¢ a[ Emon\ Z m mw m a,- (x0 ¢d it a2 00 ¢ U ¢ c ¢ ° c nO o 2 E.. ¢ o m CC O Q N m41 6 a APT, ilk O . e 1 rn CD m I BI n B 'o • V 1 SI a o g B Alil lir 5,- w L. o t IOW a o L o 1;- h' U c m Q g mgl E O 0 o N O o C C o. a \ \, / O O O E CC i g t a Li 4 a :: o u d m m u, .N a� Cf) x « E o) _ .E Y c E a N m t n -O N `� r -. C WL O 8_ r- E g 9 W o c U m , 5 u g m 6 o E 6 w E m n o ai c c , 2 2 'o g m Y c g c Em a +J '2i71, Y $>, 'p E C rC t0 U d m a) <C N N N P m 'F-01N N d n CD g H Y , o E U 2 N U r c U m o y g m 'p E K _gal; a �—' `3 m O m a o m m 47 -X ,Ing -mo aci o 2%..2g7o n .m a ',5 Nr, ,, `8 E 2 m` o amici 7, d o a °,1'..28 t a E > m = g v a' E c 2 m m Afi`smg �— E o cc E 1?, Q B 2 �EC m o - o L d " '2'0_ 11 o N lC N Y L tn C � 2 co 'C3g F N •33 L a 3 D o d dik 4 O -2 .@ N C 4,5 N y c 6O -2 -1 CI y R C C.«N c Al o Q k g L 3 o . 17, o E m uoi - o A_ v� 5 2 4'-1q--K E 8 s`' a c� z O m 3 >, E �' N o °'3 A m Q K Y m g IIIi d Y CC mm E 8 3 tii E r.a � m � m � � . $ SEot a _.. m0arai E m L o mIiI ! I a�$;mmC « w E U f Et•Y=Ao ° ro c 0 mrLO4 N8 N m m C OU O @ rLm$5mf a� $ O O. m E C O JmU ' � OoG m S L UIf e ?Vilk fs . . , O -C C Q ; NO ,,- \, OC UJ 8 M ffi • m .41 O 5," to 3 lru ti Iii ! fii! a Y — — 0 .9, 2,- o.^ o". DT ` o� bb Mb aN aN 3° �' 'rs. 5 P EE EE EE EE EE ccU gl . W .6 f0 lD tD t0 (O cQi o . .fi w g'�'E rigwghlMil E °i c'S' . ' c �? bEEEEEE EE EE EE EE A oNik p �.cEEEEEE EE EE EE EE Eoo`N� o 'n oPr? o'n m p§o $"."'n No in c`2'Vn `,1':2 .-'r' 5_, y ffi ¢ ¢ Q Q V 3- E Q4 ` . m, 11 ° a a a_ co U U U 6 Q N co C G g E m E' E. E' E i- 5E l.: E� E., E� E f' U a; ¢ Q ¢ Q 52 m O V p ro p V p V p 10 g N s ON Q Y CC g ° E ^ E E E Q W e 3 m� ` g�' g B � v c4 4 2� 6 C QQ 1 W c.„! h O« 2« ! m a W W it! C li F LL G � o' $' ii Y ? N 17 17 ci >. n- < < �N a .0 E E33EE{ — 'O m m m m .m 8 C m O 2 O O� S� S� S— O ¢ m 2 m ¢Y • d 3 ¢ c7 0 w coa m3 m3 m3 m3 a- -0 W O V L O a m N E $6 IH m i$ 3 O N ' m mN .-N ON a0 6 ',.14N 2 C c C W ' co ma iY ` sa= y }Z�� Y o0 o bb 00 0 q D CD yd' 'r o c° v 'X`� x x ?7, , x S P m r .01 g . OP, ,` 53k ��{{ o� � �� mN f �� 35o Nf ro'v °' S m=£g m 2 E B c4= 63 Eiroo EQOb b bo b a VJ Ri % °' g. �°i cdo rno co'n o `� o. ! r4! :: !! o ^! ppo0o m "c5EW 6n ,n G� ^.,n c.E c,E ,n 6 n `ai W .p gg . m O E 2 R . ;t N ' 8 U a z CO CO c °��o;y c B pnpp ® CC5 8 N N N,T n N yN 1112 e C go E Yr ,„, ,,. . b m N 0 Q aD Lg yW �2 C Y m r.4 mO O n° co LL O YI mm V3Wi. W C�1 qq y �a O �C , D CDhI m e - 5 5 . C Alcoa Architectural Products 50 Industrial Boulevard Eastman,GA 31023-4129 Tel.478 374 4746 O www.alcoaarchitecturalproducts.com 02008 Alcoa Architectural Products.Reynobond®is a registered trademark of Alcoa Inc. ALCOA KEVLAR®is a registered trademark of E.I.du Pont de Nemours and Company and is used under license by Alcoa Architectural Products. AAP-0423-3/08 20000 i H a1 o t) cci N y E 50 cu o o .70 Qca a o C 4 4- O s filii,etmind a C 0411 a 1.11. el I ry , 6 P AM y � IP ' iw 1 t mF Q a illi a .§ o 11 u 5 mo ii Q APir g it, y° U ° ! C a to 80 7 aD cd $$°a 1 1 ` i i c 3 0 ..teno oa 0 N a 0 ` Q 0 a a o Qo �y0 E a II 0 I i 1 . t ` t.... � 1 IL 0 ___--- . 3 'e R . �. . 3.333..33333 m V u, ` p 06 a ° o .1(13 o c om o a CL il5 'E ro o al S(� o ° ° >. 0 m c 2 > > ° C 4 m' U „ G O 2 3• 18 0 ° E aoN p_ aQ cy s, yJ 0 r ED o b o o 2 'r p y0, N L0 y C U U >, ° E N � -gU N y a Um 7 7 U O U C i CO 2 — N E N O � p m L 'O N Oti, _- a>T m Om .c O Y fr -m -4• m -U 'p rs C td j U :t ;a ' d° Eu°i t 3 °33 LU =o a m a a cp m m , y O m Ea as m Z Y ° ° 2omv o omam o ° yS r„ D0 4 N ° _0 0- YT Y 0 oNm S . lg N m 0 C on 13 o 0 . 0 ,, m oo ° oa m 1 ` O o 03 - ro o 0 ° Uomp oc .0 m wm . oaNiIItD !1 gnEmLao C IMOc • U . ro E 0m! o 2- 2m E o• aa) -O ° m U . U ro 9 « ° O w 9 N C CJ N 3 U 2 >11,0„, ¢U y° GNroo « >. ... p, m a) m C 7 O 5m to ON x 8 . � > x ° o 6 0) ° m a o a> a o c •3 a 8 m� .g m° 9 -° a ro m oQ Q m0, Q o, s o o m m 8 o m mo Q o -o a s i 1 i . '' C P ,1 1.5 ° J t ' °c Erm omco, m mom .c J c J a n N a t 1 ; o c .0 Y E as `L c . a OYo a @'yGNJ '5p UY O0N jn C ,, om 12oN o «ohY a Y o3 ca _ N o %s8 .01 t6 g @c ', . ° E ° o Zo `o ° Y ` ao cn c ° 0 4 al ' o � o _ '2 f « Q ° a m o m o J o ' :t':. o mo E a>, m a T °� o° 71' 2A bo _otomw > o-0 d ,,% E m w .6 L E o a r , 8) y D- c m ° aP dO >. m . ° o a, t ` o, o r, ° E g3 J .g mo _ 92o 0 -• a, 2L > Q -ucoaE wEtUY -° 'o " d... c . 3 " ' EE '- ° t) oY °� ; .8m a ;a .8a, N or > ° . 2 -g 5 9 S O1Toa , -° a toEg ro mnt E . Em cEEmmw ,=, is s3, o8tmr maoomo mY -, m ow Q 3 2m Y CO [[ - _o m i 2 3 f ¢ o o E o C4 cc o oE -11 iiii: _A — gE 2,0 U • fes, r .v: :' , ' , ' ' ', ' ',,' VV.l 1111 111 Al ��C 2 t a T y ,. j 2 'a •C mO • oC 4 o O 2 ac O 8EE O .- _ # > E a o oE o — 0 = , o a Q 0 m ° Eo0 O 0Et .o - -cN N ° c . aO7 ° U o m 5,, o, ao, e 8 9 o c m o o • m 2 o g N 2 s2 C C • m O O9A O 'OUUN ccO, O0 rc ° C ° ° U u8 m m y roo, amm N Nn o a a,• a Xc E ° agA, o I oi � � , Em r -2 -aa, Tv, o eoo aV' `C � 8vii eS_ c W _ ° o -om ° oo rna .° ca doomo .omD o, ffF 1. 7 .-). 7g -2 . w .. °, ic � oa .2som2, c Op42ic E °m, c � m m° > `m° �° r >m ..5 n o m "A ,Tm > p\ / 8 g Jc A LNcJN Ua0c -O a L °m J f0 0 't L ) O ° o o F-_ w8 fL o 8 m a o o Y co co C/) 1- 3 92 c o 1— m oc 0 s coc 0 m c =' v ® v .c w1 E E Y m a o O Co V r _ O -1--,� O EO C 12 T d /1 EO O C E G ^ C L • C ° 3 Q p 3 CO y O G2i O W 7 N U V O (Y O t ° CO C LL. 0. 3 N 0 ..9 0 j ,666 - �=- w = 1 s. -^.so-'.`". °;_. Ai 111 Illit°1111111:111 J m 3c Mt N c Fa6 YmT o ro mro cc o 'dr, -° y m a 3 -O 2 2 EpNc m d m °) N a Ws E a mvm « ro O EY N U LC T U da N — a) LO ` 2 .9 o m ES, 3) m O� mNO « tiCw a� m 3 m 0 O O)to t vmC ym T3amLV c • Q c O sN mJ y a)N E m ° ° N a ' E m°C m m« oay E ° N ° ° o ro in N9 G S L'O r a 0 0 CO ro o N Ec o s aZ' E 15 id o O m ' il N 3 ° Qmo 2O oU aro mt6 ° Ey m N LO - F- CD LI, im ro o oo0m 3a c E m m - -o m V. ° ai c -O 'o `c ° c 5 c cJ tC c omat ` o N mQ a . � o E N C N`V w Sm V E m c Da y _ d aO_ p rooz N ,T,' O. « oY c t- <73' c O CU f: 7) m N in a Nm _ EOro S. TE1 ,Eo icy N _ m mro ° 9EJmf= 9or -g 0 - aa m oCO am a E N yaO m « E ° ow o oF, en o m v L mcm g mroEm to m J -° .� U m -C' ,T .' o oc m 0 v Vc vZ E ° oa 0 ro p . � D m a m0 maC o p E m a NT COTmQ v m y , m C N m TaN aOO ac o C ` i C ° O OY T L N N N cE m °C �= 22 -c -`.1N ° d ° cno ¢TCyC OLN dNN O ¢ U mZ « 7. m Si O' U ¢ a[ n °(\ 7m ° ON mroO o c -a Tii 12 on cc CC • , Nc T TO C `O OYyNC QOC h, a4 O yCL r d N Y O o° on g 3 O OO0,aa -om o n m � o `o m m m vT N 0QN . u) ra t NOO _Lco D E ai % m g .5 ca¢i o N a ro oo o • U O O p , •C T O p N ` c 3 m ° ro Q 2 `_,S) � o, c c E � c y o ° p a m 2 p o ro > 8 m g m E 5 L ra 5c E • -8 m t a « Y o -O AO N O O C y 3 N O s g- >, @ao a' $ �a .0 nom a@aa £ ` cco ro ptl c.7, @ o o — oO ccE@T g 2 -o .° 9 = m aa o a. m 2m -O m 2m U) y mo 3 N z o C 00pD 7 d O OL amO t y pxN t, o oa) E , n 0 m = T C m .. C C U> w L O tu �Q mg 0a > c $ ft, a . E , 7 0Wcap ac O CO aa, Emo mEco YpadY oTm .a00 O aU w yO _ OOO7TrOAN -c C E T g - oc co 0o � 0. 0 aa s c 't a ,, umi 2 ? ai • E 0 wao `mc o ma0roa = < C 0 0 ro UEa o ° t m E i C Yr, o 2 E ' g ' ° 0 m , Ero .. v ¢ ,_ m o Cc 58 m -E O ._ E O F-3) O N CuON i t uo E Up_ m ° 3 o a m ¢ - ,, x cri . w ° O E > -po c Evi L a, O J L .O c 2 TE Ym ¢ m T t Op O § Q m = ONoC .pE om - Uo . W a O T }, 'D p U ro C ` 0 O) uaf .p p6 - cEsoE a) o O UC O 'O N O a O @ N - 9y N H _O , U +J UO ¢ , O �' Na> w y � 00 �CEJOa ¢ NaO` N: 9 « Uway :5OO O Q C O l O i C N .> ' 4- a I l a, 3 .p s o T.Cv= m E OXL r C T y LL C 'O O c cE, c E a1 y c v y • U) ma Oy ro vs g • TD b E � w o c Qro E- ; g8vuyo nm { 9 = -o O OJ O j E O O L g « A c CN OTN q � ; 25 _ nrnrAm Y a, p 'OE OO a .p O i f° NL. < L- ai O ¢ E NNd 'NNCNm pg c vO •- ,, E. ««v t }I •H Y 75 O ? O ¢ U 2 ¢ NU g0 @p O x m E l 72 uo ' CO 2 ro L E g ° o a a a ' m w 1-- m 'oE' c N -oa -I-' m 9co > & pac p mEo Y cm aro oomEo aE . m t o iai 3 § a _ o E d mpg - Et .1 Q, ro a o o _ Hikma YT2an, cca) oc 'O , a G r t E Q 3 a 0 > CC g « "O _L vn9iac3 « 2 o 0 ro £ , c a13aO - m3 a v ' Q ec c 5 a. a mY a o 0 p E .E Q = . d QO, m o t' L3 o E o a .a 1 ro om °N5o t �> = v d . p CD a w to' 15, m ` a 3 « o E O '` tm < if . La17i m ac d 2 U .E 2.,:z. ° m L _ LL c , TNa, v w c wp2_ EL2 L U v ' o E i3pro oro 'p Q c m0 ° O a m c E O 3 ai oap .Ny -p 'O$ roc Nm Ea 6 m Y OaUmO 8 i O 4s,-Ti U0 L 4d m a!ill .9tig aE 0 c nTo o) V EC qw W > � hO12) m Sti E mc pa mEpCyLy > 7 w a L ¢ € 7 ¢ a E U > V, oZ' W FoO5 0 ¢ o E 0 Q ,F---, I a) _ r+ 0 E -= O L- O -C E Q L. g s 9 m� 8 o s 8 9 a N m N z° g88 C 8 0 6 a _ 8 -o Q y m 8 N o ma m E = a L. o, o o o m m m o 1 1 -Ea° § 8 N N m in Y o En z Z z al oN z > a Z z LL 0 0 U m.rn o^ o :2,- o m o • N. « a N O N a N 748 00 S Q m e - E E EE EE EE EE Z a° ¢ ° z- -O EN SEES EN EEEE EN 0 14 tl _F' Q Q n 0 0. .a o^ N o^ NN o^ o . * m g N .. w H Q 4 « n X o g N� m m , m �iO a' O 'D + O Fm F rn 00 0 U 5 m 5 ¢ ,°° z ° 2 _ o _�a° me 8 - - o g g ° 7 o m L O r )' m -° im m T ' s N ; � Z9 2 m 8 V 8 .N c°21:3• • — • W Cl• Otg O N O• ONo l d0 e 5`°_5 3 o"0 EEEEE EE EE EE EE m -° o m` OOEEEEEE EE EE EE EE E 2 I yi8NNNS8 NS NN O' oUl d No a z . o aU aq av a0 u 0 0 - 8i d° Oat E o 0 (L * $ N m a O E� EC' EN Ew E`` I a o V 0 o 2 ¢ a ¢ a Clp ap cop ao op I o m £'i a 0 ow Fn C) inm N YU7 a g l' N a o a o a 2) a i N ,o c� o N Al' co, tE U U U a U 4 g ' Y m t _ O U Ucc C mm w w ¢ o La E E E E L E v mw a a w ¢ • � q aj q o C o. E W U oc o+• o« og o. a w w w m o• o m c v F � pa Ga oa GW a¢ IL C m O N O,� O 24 2,Y' • J 8 g 8 T j ? C a N 5 C 4" ,-a l'O T T T.., 9 m m m m N W 3 nr d > ° o u � ¢3 ¢3 ¢3 z3 0 ¢ m m ¢ i, a >i Q Do ow a IL og o� �m ins Er> - 0 bb o0 ' EN mN 222 ;72 oY op mo -O' 7'; o. mo <! H c� ° E a mN "LT-NN CC V N N N N n 2 N 5805.5 0 00 0 $0 00 o,O -- `n, o-, N mN 0a o CC a o ° - ¢ 3 a y y-@ ° o Nmt 3 0 n No 7,m om oa Em oo mo �o b ,4 Mg §� H 8 8 0 0 x a �" -� N CJN N ON T00 0,V 28 -, y @ �Y Q S V O r g�aBmE3 g U) E =Das•z. o OD E '1 , �' m�Z o Q VJ bo o $0 00 0�° o<O m D D a -o _. v- Na goi m ox mei vu'i o4V -o C rnt 5 o o m0 C' '- 0� <pV m a 3 CD m N N o.5 °o Q S Cf= E 5500 3 ° �o am rn NCJ ',DO b b' oN '0N r5N n E t m 3 0 a o° mN O. No _o (v, vo d 5_ U) o 0 ov ' mN �� .N r- L0 co- " - 5 a N -° a> vJ-— S o a.o ., ?2 ,% ? ii U3 S E 8 o, o LC c oE 110111!> E 2 2 2 cE 2 M .92 Si? S= 2W `gmoE C¢ p00tcoOcO CC5 c' U _-c v c N �3 2Pyo & CO �V U ° a% O 2 m r in 2 EY 8c'c o n «". a 0s ma IL 3, r 5 m m 3 'a o 2 Nm tg ".5, _ °H ° ya �: 9� m; O 9m L 7, c4 m o0 S- on c_ry W Ea ° f d8 H°� �S v.y-'• O-'`� E o' =. C x ma~i y m� v . c o_ - aV Q¢ E a> ,g§ m �/f�J\ c C 'T T _o 'y 2‹ LLQ O E, GN C a_%i W E i CN ?N O N N m ` Ua - - Alltl.ow am U., N aQ 2 N -Q LLQ « C 33 Trebcock ulannline•eneuineerinu Traffic Impact Statement Porsche of Naples Site Development Plan Amendment (SDPA) Collier County, FL 04/01/2016 Prepared for: Prepared by: J.R. Evans Engineering, PA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 9351 Corkscrew Road, Suite#102 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Estero, FL 33928 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-405-9148 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee—$ 500.00 Collier County Transportation Review Fee—Small Scale Study— No Fee Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. 11.14.1 �`Ns_x 3."TRE : ,,, ioyi e, :OQ .• \- *.NS�•.C'O�: : No 47116 '•i' _ *; •* •* _ 1.53.• STATE OF ••14/ ' • 1,'''tSiONALE.1 ,. Norman J.Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. �'1iiifillto. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 12 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Table of Contents Project Description 4 Trip Generation 5 Trip Distribution and Assignment 6 Background Traffic 9 Existing and Future Roadway Network 9 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network Link Analysis 10 General Transportation Considerations 11 Site Access Turn Lane Analysis 13 Improvement Analysis 15 Mitigation of Impact 15 APPENDICES Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan 16 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) 18 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition 26 Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits 30 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 13 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Project Description The Porsche of Naples development is a proposed luxury automobile sales center located in east Naples on the north side of Davis Boulevard (SR 84),just west of Airport-Pulling Road. The project has a street address of 3147 Davis Boulevard. The project is approximately 2.16 acres in size and it is located in Section 2,Township 50 South, Range 25 East, in Collier County, Florida. Refer to Fig. 1— Project Location Map, below, and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Fig. 1—Project Location Map O 01.4 The site has an existing 12,850sf building and parking lot that was used as a luxury automobile sales dealership (reference Table 1A, next page). This Site Development Plan Amendment (SDPA) proposes to remodel the existing building to a 31,123sf automobile dealership and add a 16,973sf parking garage. The parking garage is considered incidental to the automobile dealership and is not included in traffic generation calculations. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 14 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Table 1A Existing Approved Development Program Development Land Use ITE Land Use ITE Land Use Code Total Size Commercial Automobile Sales 841 12,850sf The proposed Porsche of Naples project will be developed as a luxury automobile dealership as shown in Table 1B, below. Table 1B Proposed Development Program Development Land Use ITE Land Use ITE Land Use Code Total Size Commercial Automobile Sales 841 31,123sf A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on November 3, 2015, via email, as illustrated in Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist. For purposes of this evaluation, the project build-out year is assumed to be consistent with the Collier County 2018 planning horizon. Connections to the site are currently provided via one right-in/right-out access onto westbound Davis Boulevard and two full movement accesses onto eastbound Terrace Avenue. As part of this application, the project proposes to relocate the existing driveway on Davis Boulevard and one of the two existing driveways on Terrace Avenue. Trip Generation The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition and the software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, Version 4.0.2). The ITE rates and equations are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition. The new proposed SDPA total project trip generation is illustrated in Table 2A. The trip generation analysis based on existing approved conditions is shown in Table 2B. The projected net new trip generation (Table 2C) shows total proposed versus existing conditions (the difference between Table 2A and Table 2B). Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 1 5 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Based on ITE recommendations and Collier County Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) guidelines, no reductions for internal capture or pass-by trips have been taken into consideration. Table 2A Trip Generation (Proposed SDPA Conditions)—Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Way Volume ITE Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Automobile Sales 31,123sf 1,005 45 15 60 33 50 83 The site access turn lane analysis is calculated based on the SDP build-out external trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hour (as shown in Table 2A). Table 2B Trip Generation (Existing Approved Development)—Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Way Volume ITE Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Automobile Sales 12,850sf 415 19 6 25 19 29 48 Table 2C Trip Generation (Projected Net New Traffic)—Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Way Volume Development Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Proposed SDPA 1,005 45 15 60 33 50 83 Existing Approved 415 19 6 25 19 29 48 Net New Traffic 590 26 9 35 14 21 35 Increase(Decrease) For the purpose of this TIS, the surrounding roadway network link concurrency analysis is analyzed based on projected PM peak hour net new traffic generated by the project (refer to Table 2C). Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic generated by the development was assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area, and as coordinated with Collier County Transportation Planning staff. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 1 6 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 The assignment of the net new proposed site-generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour and is graphically depicted in Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour Distribution PM Peak Hr Project Roadway Link CC AUIR Roadway Link Location of Project Traffic Vol.* Link ID# Traffic Enter Exit Davis Blvd Tamiami Trail East to (SR 84) 12.0 Airport Rd 30.0% EB—4 WB—7 Davis Blvd Airport Rd to 0 (SR 84) 13.0 Lakewood Blvd 20.0% WB—3 EB—4 Airport Rd (CR 31) 5.0 Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 25.0% SB—4 NB—5 Airport Rd Davis Blvd to 0 (CR 31) 6.0 Tamiami Trail East 25.0% NB-4 SB-5 Note(s): *Peak hour,peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 17 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Fig. 2—Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour PROJECT TRIP DISTRBUTION MAP BY PERCENTAGE t .. V < > ,J < >. ,. 17701 20% 2 5E71 PROJECT TRIP DISTRBUTION MAP BY PM PEAK HOUR N .ENTER-4, EXIT-5 A V 111111111 < > ENITER-4, EXIT-, A ENTER-4, EXIT-51 ENTER-3, EXIT-4 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 18 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Background Traffic Future projected background traffic volumes are calculated based on approved growth rates and trip bank volumes for the segments of the roadway network in the study area, as shown in Collier County 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). The higher of the two determinations, is to be used in the Roadway Link Level of Service analysis. Based on Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance, a minimum of 2% growth rate is considered. Table 4 illustrates the projected background peak hour peak direction traffic volume (without project) for the future build-out year 2018. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2015 -2018) 2015 AUIR Projected 2018 Projected 2018 Projected CC Pk Hr,Pk Dir Traffic Pk Hr,Peak Dir Pk Hr,Peak Dir Background Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Volume Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor Bank w/out Project w/out Project ID# Volume Rate (trips/hr) (%/yr)* (trips/hr) (trips/hr) Growth Factor** Trip Bank*** Davis Blvd 12 0 Tamiami Trail East 1,480 2.0% 1.0612 1,571 14 1,494 (SR 84) to Airport Rd Davis Blvd 13.0 Airport Rd to 1,520 2.0% 1.0612 1,613 0 1,520 (SR 84) Lakewood Blvd Airport Rd5 0 Radio Rd to 2,000 2.0% 1.0612 2,122 14 2,014 (CR 31) Davis Blvd Airport Rd Davis Blvd to (CR 31) 6.0 Tamiami Trail East 1,610 2.0% 1.0612 1,709 6 1,616 Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate—from 2008-2015 AUIR,or 2%minimum. **Growth Factor=(1+Annual Growth Rate)^3.2018 Projected Volume=2015 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2018 Projected Volume=2015 AUIR Volume+Trip Bank. The projected 2018 Peak Hour—Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation,which is underlined and bold as applicable. Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). Future projected roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5- Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements are identified in the Collier County 2015 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build-out. The existing and projected future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 1 9 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Min. Exist Peak Dir, Future CC AUIR Roadway Link Exist Peak Hr Project Roadway Link rd Link ID# Location Roadway St LOS Capacity Build out Volume Roadway Davis Blvd 12 0 Tamiami Trail East to 6D E 2,700(EB) 6D (SR 84) Airport Rd Davis Blvd 13.0 Airport Rd to 4D D 2,000(EB) 4D (SR 84) Lakewood Blvd Airport Rd 5.0 Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 6D E 2,800(NB) 6D (CR 31) Airport Rd Davis Blvd to (CR 31) 6.0 Tamiami Trail East 6D 2,700(SB) 6D E Note(s): 2U=2-lane undivided roadway;4D,6D,8D=4-lane,6-lane,8-lane divided roadway,respectively;LOS=Level of Service. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future. The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links, and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at year 2018 future conditions. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service, illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the studied roadway network. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page I 10 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS)—With Project in the Year 2018 Roadway % 2015 Peak 2018 Peak Vol. Min LOS Min LOS Link,Peak Roadway CC AUIR Roadway Link Dir,Peak Dir, Peak Hr Dir, Peak Capacity exceeded exceede Link ID Hr Hr Volume Impact without d with Link Location Project Capacity w/Project By Project? Project? Volume Volume ** Project Yes No Yes No Added* Yes/No Davis Blvd 12 0 Tamiami Trail East 2,700(EB) EB—4 1,575 0.15% No No (SR 84) to Airport Rd Davis Blvd 13.0 Airport Rd to 2,000(EB) EB—4 1,617 0.20% No No (SR 84) Lakewood Blvd Airport RdRadio Rd to 5.0 2,800(NB) NB—5 2,127 0.18% No No (CR 31) Davis Blvd Airport Rd6 0 Davis Blvd to 2,700 SB—5 1,714 0.19% No No (CR 31) Tamiami Trail East (SB) Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2018 Projected Volume=2018 background(refer to Table 4)+Project Volume Added. General Transportation Considerations Davis Boulevard (SR 84), Collier County ID #12, link from Tamiami Trail to Airport-Pulling Road is a six-lane, west-east divided major arterial roadway under Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) jurisdiction. This segment of SR 84 has an Access Management Classification of 5 with a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. The established spacing standard is 245 ft. between driveway connections, 660 ft. for directional median openings, and 1,320 ft. for full median openings and signals. The existing driveway on SR 84 does not meet driveway connection spacing, and it is desired to be brought into reasonable compliance given the unique site conditions. A meeting with FDOT staff was held on November 23, 2015. Based on discussions at this meeting, it was acknowledged that FDOT would only consider a non-conforming connection somewhere near the center of the property's frontage on Davis Boulevard. This location has currently approximately 205 ft. from the adjacent driveways and would be considered a reasonable compromise for a non-conforming connection location. At the time of the meeting, the project redevelopment proposed one access point providing 95 ft.± of connection separation to the existing driveway on the corner parcel at the Davis Boulevard and Airport Road intersection. As FDOT expressed concerns with safety and general operation of this driveway, the connection location was realigned to provide approximately Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 111 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 160 ft. spacing to the eastern corner property driveway, and 200 ft.± spacing to the western properties access. It is expected that eastbound traffic wanting to access the dealership would make eastbound to westbound U-turns at the intersection of SR 84 and Airport-Pulling Road. The proposed driveway location accommodates a maneuver — weaving distance of approximately 245 ft. measured from the intersection's eastbound left turn STOP bar. In agreement with most current FDOT Median Handbook, Section 2.2.1, the suggested minimum decision distance for suburban conditions and 45 mph posted speed is 130 ft. A future Collier County roadway project on Airport-Pulling Road is scheduled to introduce a southbound to westbound right-turn lane to be constructed as a slip ramp under YIELD condition. In conclusion, based on these facts, the proposed driveway location on Davis Boulevard is a reasonable deviation to the FDOT driveway spacing standards and provides for generally safe traffic operations. Terrace Avenue is a two-lane east-west rural undivided local roadway under Collier County jurisdiction. Consistent with similar type roadways in the vicinity of this roadway, it is assumed to have a legal speed of 25 mph. The Porsche of Naples project proposes an automobile dealership with sales center, automotive servicing center and a vehicular storage garage. The different service areas have different levels of access including the general public, sales staff, maintenance staff and automotive shipping trucks. Collier County Resolution No. 13-257, as may be amended, establishes the adopted Collier County Access Management system for arterial and collector roadways. Consistent with the Collier County Access Management Resolution, Section 3.09.2.1, there should be no more than one connection per road frontage. Currently, the property has two driveway connections to Terrace Avenue, which the applicant wishes to retain. This project seeks relief from this resolution to instead allow the two existing driveway connections to Terrace Avenue to remain as adjusted. No additional driveway connections are requested as part of this SDPA — refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Of these two requested access points, only one will be open to the general public. This access point is the easternmost access point to the property on Terrace Avenue. The remaining one access point is only accessible by Porsche employees. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA P a e 112 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 This project also seeks deviation from certain sections of the Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right-of-way, Collier County, as it pertains to the accesses along Terrace Avenue. A second deviation seeks relief from the Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right-of-way, Collier County, Section III.C.6.b.(2) which requires a minimum throat length of 50 ft., to instead allow for a minimum length of 30 ft. The requested throat length of 30 ft. is proposed for the gated ingress/egress along Terrace Avenue. The operation of the dealership is such that the vehicle storage area must be kept separate from the public necessitating the gates in this location (western access). Therefore, vehicles entering the site will be driven by Porsche employees that have the ability to space out the intervals in order to avoid vehicle stacking on Terrace Avenue. Therefore, no negative impacts are anticipated with this deviation. A third deviation seeks relief from the Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right-of-way, Collier County, Section III.C.6.c.(3) which requires that commercial gates provide a minimum throat length of 30 ft., measured from the right-of-way line to the face of the gate, to allow for a minimum length of 30 ft. to be measured from the nearest edge of pavement of the roadway to the face of the gate. As stated above, this entrance will be accessed by Porsche employees only, thereby eliminating concerns of vehicle stacking on Terrace Avenue. Therefore, no negative impacts are anticipated with this deviation. Site Access Turn Lane Analysis Access to the site is currently provided via one right-in/right-out connection onto westbound Davis Boulevard and two full movement connections onto eastbound Terrace Avenue. The project proposes to relocate the existing driveway on Davis Boulevard and rearrange the two existing driveways on Terrace Avenue as part of the Site Development Plan Amendment Application. For more details refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. The site access turn lane analysis is calculated based on the projected SDPA build-out trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hours (as illustrated in Table 2A). The estimated project trips at driveway locations are illustrated in Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits. Project Access—Davis Boulevard Based on the posted speed limit of 45 mph on Davis Boulevard in the vicinity of the project, the right-turning threshold volume for warranting a right-turn lane is 80-125vph, according to the FDOT Driveway Information Guide. The project is expected to generate 31 and 23vph right-turning movements during AM and PM peak hour, respectively, which is below the Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 113 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 threshold values. As such, a dedicated westbound-right turn lane is not warranted at this location. Project Accesses—Terrace Avenue The project accesses are evaluated for turn lane warrants based on the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook: (a) two-lane roadways — 40vph for right-turn lane/20vph for left-turn lane; and (b) multi-lane divided roadways — right-turn lanes shall always be provided; when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left-turn lanes. Turn lane lengths required at build-out conditions are analyzed based on the number of turning vehicles in an average one-minute period for right-turning movements, and two-minute period for left-turning movements, within the peak hour traffic. The minimum queue length is 25 ft. and the queue/vehicle is 25 ft. For more details, refer to Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits. As previously noted, the western access is used by employees only, while the eastern connection onto the property is open to general public. Additionally, the adjacent parking lot to the west of the project may be leased by Porsche of Naples. This parking lot provides two full accesses onto eastbound Terrace Avenue. Based on a 15-20% distribution of traffic for this location, dedicated right- and left-turn lanes are not warranted. The proposed site plan provides restricted traffic site connectivity, consistent with specific desired dealership operations. As such, internal traffic is expected to access Terrace Avenue in order to use vehicle service bays and/or the parking garage. As the western access is used by employees only, minimum traffic is expected in the AM and PM peak hours. For purposes of this analysis, the additional internal traffic accessing Terrace Avenue at the garage connection is assumed to be 15%, as illustrated in Appendix D. As such, a dedicated westbound left-turn lane is not warranted for the western access location. At the eastern access location, the project is expected to generate 7 and 5vph right-turning and left-turning movements during AM and PM peak hour, respectively, which is below the threshold values. As such, dedicated right- and left-turn lanes are not warranted at this location. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA P a i'>. a 14 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Improvement Analysis Based on the roadway network link analysis results, the proposed project is not a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network traffic at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate proposed development generated trips without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Based on the site access turn lane analysis results, turn lanes are not recommended at project proposed accesses. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA P a g a 15 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 116 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 1 ..- A..„ I co 111 . r. , 1131 r..� ---r _. I -; a `, I . ,_c—Th , q (-- .. —0.w. i . .....---77)1 7 1 1 r 1 -§ 1 1 0 1 �— € 1 ., t. > 1 C. I II iD. _ I I -10) i 1 4,...: 1 / = , --;,, 5 is 1 _. I e - e a. lit 9 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA P a g 117 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) (7 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 118 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply,or N/A(not applicable). Date: November 3,2015 Time: Nl�t Location:N/A—Via Email People Attending: Name,Organization,and Telephone Numbers 1) Stephen Baluch,Collier County Growth Management Division 2) Norman Trebilcock,TCS 3) Ciprian Malaescu,TCS Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title:Norman Trebilcock,AICP,PE Organization:Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Address&Telephone Number: 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202,Naples.Fl 34110:ph 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name&Title:Stephen Baluch,PE Organization&Telephone Number:Collier County Transportation Planning Department 239-252-2361 Applicant: Applicant's Name:J.R.Evans Engineering,PA Address:9351 Corkscrew Road,Suite 102.Estero,FL 33928 Telephone Number:239-405-9148 Proposed Development: Name:Porsche of Naples—SDPA Location: on the north side of Davis Blvd. lust west of Airport-Pulling Rd. (refer to Fir.1),address 3147 Davis Blvd.,Collier County Land Use Type:Approved/Proposed-Automobile Sales ITE Code#: Approved-LUC 841 Description: Approved Maximum Existing Conditions — 12,850sf Automobile Sales: Proposed SDPA Conditions—49,205sf Automobile Sales. SDPA proposes to refurbish existing building and add a parking garage. To provide additional parking.the owner will lease 30 parking spaces from adiacent owners. Page 1 of7 C Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 119 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Fig.1—Project Location Map . , ,.. . 1 5 zr Zoning Existing:C-5,GTMUD-MXD Comprehensive plan recommendation:NIA Requested:SDP approval for new development Findings of the Preliminary Study. Study type: Since projected net new PM project traffic is more than 50 and less than 100 peak hour trips,this study qualifies for a Minor TIS—no significant operational impacts with minimal roadway impacts and work within the county right-of-way.The TIS will include concurrency analysis— PM peak hour trip distribution and traffic assignment Operational site access turn lane analysis based on total external trips—AM/PM peak hour trip generation. No pass-by or internal capture will be considered for this study. Davis Blvd.is under FDOT jurisdiction and Terrance Ave is a Collier County maintained roadway., Study Type: (if not net increase,operational study) Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ►1 Major TIS El Page 2 of 7 C Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 120 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Study Area: Boundaries: south—Davis Blvd.east---Airport Rd Additional intersections to be analyzed:N/A Build Out Year:2016 Planning Horizon Year:2018 Analysis Time Period(s):AM/PM Future Off-Site Developments:N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates:1TE 0 Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None:N/A Pass-by trips:N/A Internal trips(PUD):N/A Transit use:N/A Other:N/A Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2018 Methodology&Assumptions: Non-site traffic estimates:Collier County traffic counts and/or 2015 AUIR Site-trip generation: LUC 841—1TE 0 Edition Trip distribution method:engineer's estimate—refer to Fig.2,below Traffic assignment method:project trip generation with background growth Traffic growth rate:historical growth rate or 2°/o minimum Project Accesses: Davis Blvd,—westbound right in-right out;Terrace Ave.—two full movement accesses into parking areas, one full movement access into service bay and two full movement accesses into adjacent leased parking area west of project—see Fig.3—Master Site Plan on next page and Fig 4—Turning Movements by percentage on page 5. Fig.2—Project Trip Distribution by Percentage F, • =I ,-7-- MUM El Page 3 of 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 121 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 ` Fig.3—Master Site Plan og 1 14 13ai• L Iii, ; oI f "n• , 1 ( '�, ' 2 up 1 i , ill{x101 ;_ gi 31 k ,` > k 1 � i t 3 .1.._i j L�' I ,. 3t. aol I s df W f1 II ,..% l 0 1 I-4' T / , A a , V t6 y4 1 i ri, , .,...,:j .„ .tr rerLyi' H ' AZ S ''g' ; J. ,i Mg ° 1111111111; 11 Page 4 of 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 122 Porsche of Naples-SDPA-TIS-April 2016 Fig.-4 Turning Movements by Percentage Li pj -9s i #{�� _,, a 1I- ,_ u� Irit-- � % it a 1 1 „..-,'i,, 1",++r,,,,t. 4E-t,. ,g,. .... .:____ ____ , ._,... , # #}Ci{ = a ._ Ion §4 ._._ I j In , ! Pi* C3 .b..aFP a9,'K„a�y,`f- R z e. MIIIL � er ,N to , 0 Lf?:(:).;:5—'9 I Uzi f— WZ wW� ya cin �= 0 l 1� 111111111 111111111 pq 6 r oil R.G 4 Page Sof 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 123 Porsche of Naples-SDPA–TIS–April 2016 Special Features (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations:NiA Sight distance:N/A Quelling:N/A Access location&configuration NIA Traffic control:MUTCD Signal system location&progression needs:N/A On-site parking needs:N/A Data Sources:CC 2015 AUIIL CC Traffic Counts Base maps:NA Prior study reports:NIA Access policy and jurisdiction:N/A Review process: Requirements:N/A Miscellaneous: N/A Small Scale Study–No Fee Minor Study-$750.00 x -$500.00 Methodology Fee--$1,250.00 Major Study-$1500.00 Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections v$500.00 each Altfees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign-off on the application. Vireo SIGNATURES Nortnt.Gltd.Tre6%I,cac� Study Preparer—Norman Trebilcock. Reviewers) Applicant Page 6 of 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 124 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review,Analysis Review,and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodology Review-$500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement,including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re-submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County,if needed. "Small Scale Study"Review-No Additional Fee(Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation,distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review"-$750 Fee(Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes:optional field visit to site,confirmation of trip generation,distribution,and assignment,concurrency determination,confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off-site improvements within the right-of-way,review of site access and circulation,and preparation and review of"sufficiency"comments/questions. "Maior Study Review"-$1,500 Fee(Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency reviews) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination,confirmation of committed improvements,review of traffic volume data collected/assembled,review of traffic growth analysis,review of off-site roadway operations and capacity analysis,review of site access and circulation,neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates,and preparation and review of up to two rounds of"sufficiency"comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review"-$500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the`Major Study Review"and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the"Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews"-$500 Fee) Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 7 of 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 125 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition (3 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page i 26 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 earI Project Name: Porsche of Naples-Existing No: Date: 1113/2105 City, State/Prosince: ZIpiPostal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: ITE-TOM 116 Edition Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peau Hour Sitry Eadt Entry Exit Entry j s....,..,.. Rik ._.. 1 841-Automobile Sales 12.651" 208 '201 19 6 19 29 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-pass-by 208. 207 19 6 19 29 Total.... 208 20719 6 19 28 Total Reduction a 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 9 0 0 0 0 Total Pass.by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Nonpasieby, 208 28T 19 $ 18 29 rn in_F7 Ao Ants^Rour army Period Setting vt Data provided by ITE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis.To record any notes,click - Add Notes above. Project Name: Porsche of Naples-Existing Analysis Name: !Weekday I Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method a Entry Exit Total Q. 841-Automobile Sales 1000 Sq.Feet Gross 0v} 12,85`0 [weekday El Average 0v 0 32.3 208 207 415 151 indicates aize out of range. Period Setting ✓ Data provided by ITE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Tnps generated in the analysis.To record any notes,click rf Add Notes above. Project Name' Porsche of Naples=Existing Analysis Name AM Peak Hour j Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 0 841-Automobile Sales 1000 Sq.Feet Gross cj$ 12.85 1Weekday,PeakHourl-=.0�verage a a 1.92 19 6 25 C Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 127 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Period Setting eo Data provided by lit Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis.To record any notes,click -' Add Notes above. Project Name Porsche of Naples-Existing Analysis Name: I PM Peak Hour I Land Use Independent Vanebie Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total a,841-Automobile Sales 11000 Sg.Feet Gross 0 12.85 Weell ;;;,Peak Hour sE, Best Fit(LIN) ':i-j; T 1 91(X)+23.74 19 29 48 Project Name: Porsche of Naples-Proposed No: Date: 3/2912015 City: StatelProvibte: ZiplPostW Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: ITE-IOM 90 Edition ViEEKSA', Akt PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND NSE SIZE Entry Exit Enny Exit Entry Exit . I 841-Automobile Sales 31 13''"I , 1 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by 0 0 0 0 0 Non-pass-by 503 502 503 502 45 16 33 4f6 15 . I 33 , 50 0 60 ,.._ Total 603 502 46 IS 33 , 50 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 O. 0 0 , 0 Total Pass-by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non-pass-by 503 502 45 15 33 50 ....„... in rreb br Fget Gros moon mea PERIOD SETTING ,„, DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysts To record any notes,dick-' Add Notes above MFr-fie.re,... ID weekday INDEPENDENT LAND USE SIZE TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE 841-Automobile Sales 1000 Sq.Feet Gros,s, 31.13 (Weekday DI Average 3 lil 503 502 1005 32.3 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA P age I 28 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 2. PERIOD SETTING ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes,click {=Add Notes above. P1i(,IECTNAME Pag-SGliEOFNAPLES-PRO E,:: n+FtVSSN MEAM Peak Hourj LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE 641-Automobile Sales 1000 Sq.Feet Gros.31 31.13 rWeekdayL ,Peak Hein Average 310 1.92 45 15 60 PERIOD SETTING ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable. Time Period.,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of I Trips generated in the analysis_To record any notes,click -- Add Notes above. >uo.. rtAa. P,,-i=c N 4PLEs.PROPEI i ;0'0'513 NAME PM Peak Hour a INDEPENDENT LANG USE VARIABLE SIZE TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXITTOTAL (,Q 641-Automobile Sales i 1000 Sq.Feet Gros:EJ 31.13 Weekday,PeakHatBest Fit(LIN) Ltd.la 33 50 83 1 — —'_ T=1.91(X)+23.74 I Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 129 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits (2 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 130 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 G ' i ' t V a. s u ti` ' 1 i ' t i�_. _ LO 1 9 Q 01.�. "® i , — c - I 1 I o O L,I), 1 it ' � ni I I .11 / iii i It e s iZ a s' W . . r Q H M W ` 0 -;-t, W > <I ia 8- a. i f 1 A 0 1 1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 131 Porsche of Naples-SDPA–TIS–April 2016 1 I , T [ , g#g g tl N # !h 1-1 a r , � 3 I a CI- i $ o Qg _, t ._. __._1_J I t *4 r ' c li `— I , to ii 1 N - .---. I 1 I I 1 c x 4- S I 4 ..». I -I i– ?tel Y 9 `s' i , ,e) I a — , - ,TICiO 9 4 I �z Z u'_ Q 7. , © , r . . W ' rW I.I it 0I C Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 132 allIk C JR. EVANS ENGINEERING PORSCHE OF NAPLES-PROJECT LOCATION • "l .: it.-..;•.."7.„,!,..' i t-s 1 � y .. � , .�® ... J, � ,�� 11 . t-./\----3 I- .©Ia�hIits. ,r_ -� 1 I 1��. ��II'I cyst IIx ::. � . -- 1 It nit 4 u .5.....r..7. tpi\lx\,.„...x„:::.,,,c,:::..i.::\kt''V.,....\.z L,z,...:\\\:‘,..„\\::...., ,,,,,,_... 1 7 1 ,\\ .. # 7Ir.1 :«e1a 7`� g )t 1/ -- }iliftttt[L..«.ltr = S /�/i TV, ni q' *1-'11 --11K- Liiii411111111k J_—'l t !1!1111 um pit/ r,. 1,1,,,,.., r MR%`• �""i a tiNii 4/1 I 9ttA7AA �. i O eMr.gOMwlh. /. IM o . lois om.' `^'•- MAq 1YYwMb4mrmWAsv.nimvv : IA ' MEP 4 c\ ___ 7< �= I1 mrnmm�.a u.wares er MOP ® Trotter } fFt,.re Land the ..111 .,_.. i4 ''''\ j IT I '—- KM/tery Centel 16 ii ........ CRA,0,,r4rY 0...)*B04,4.7 G-z H .....4, H , MA !i C J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD, STE. 102/ESTERO, FL 33928/239.405.9148 (p)/239.288.2537(f) WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM AltD. J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING PORSCHE OF NAPLES- SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATION CRITERIA Dated: 4-20-2016 As per Collier County LDC 10.02.03.F.7.we offer the following: a. Land uses within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved uses in the zoning district. The land is zoned C5, which permits automobile dealerships. b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established (Bayshore Redevelopment District) and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. Prospective Porsche purchasers and Porsche owners having their vehicles serviced will also use goods and services available from nearby suppliers. The development provides beneficial services, revenue from the multiplier effect - employment opportunities to the community and enhances the area economy by employees utilizing retail and food and beverage suppliers in the surrounding area as well as tax revenue. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each function (sales and vehicle service)of the development shall be adequate to service its intended purpose and will be monitored by specific access requirements. e. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features,vehicular parking and loading facilities,sight distances,landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. All of these enumerated features are present and functioning as they have historically since this is a redevelopment of the same type of use on the site. f. Visual character of the project shall be greater in quality and visual impact than that required by the development standards of the zoning district and the surrounding area. The development proposes a unified architectural style with complementary landscape and hardscape features which will benefit the area also. g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee is not applicable at this point in time. h. Deviations are clearly delineated in the accompanying documents and reflect what are considered to enhance the overall development. i. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development including enhanced landscaping, planters, pavers, and green screens. Visual representations are included in the Deviation Justifications document accompanying this application. j. Approval of the deviations will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. The proposed Porsche Dealership will provide an improvement in the surrounding area. J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD, STE. 102/ ESTERO, FL 33928/239.405.9148 (p)/239.288.2537(f) WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM X ,. � ." �—�- .-if, ,fix ;a CD -:n � ' ' �; 70 `' r "CD ` r i u CC) i ;: C` A) u l , ' A , . , ,,- . c:. , •, CT1 ,- , { * 1 . f 41 i} F rte. - ' r-.'7 - alti , , . ._. ,. ... Mall . . _4. , u 4 1 5 • PI is s !qI w ..liiil 414 ilii i et 0 Fie iiiii t lo i s-., 1 sax .. ..._ Porsche of Naples - 3147 Davis Blvd. AIVISI PRAXIS3 rcMee.xe 4 o.r, C 0 0 O O H H A Co On r O H a q _ -P a < 267.52'(P) N 0°48'49"W(M) 's 'J, N e.,:y Z� „, 4.5 �' X 4 ?"'b S, 4�u S ', • 4r _ + 'r� �yo O 41, CD I 444W I Jj 4 p ' N Z 44 o Q `4 N x <x ' 7 �� .iuiiiim' r "° �J a �° 1 IP u 36.9 ` �� \ / or- , ;--1. co op 'roti*\ N ...�. N _'o� �,� IIIIII m M , x x10f-OJ? �° oC ��? o N 03 b, o i m(A '°° -I w Z3 ti Er,O z W W D o -11 tt ZR, r -,,,,,,,,,, i 1 _ �� o % , ru iD CO O w p , m (�, (I) 33r0 co Illk., 36.9' ill 4 ; 6 Njti hiI OEl. 1 �r 'T,)11.' I$ I 4 IR :X:I. CA, E II A it O TX U J` . o J NV m m-- - N $d � OJi � II!Z AJ3 J ei ei Ar ! li ( i - 4 Rio,f u J, J 28.9' '`�. N.00°48'48"W. x z. 135.00' ;lin, i x ili MO ..I m > Va 4.v _r ., J� x .N g®_— 5.3 5.3 —__� oo�� i Z •' \ cP JJ7 A m i S 0°48'49"E(M) 131.25' (P)(M) r�«> �� " a zy Z 4 g . ZZZS `I m -Pcnm � (� «<D Zo L:= r ^O NtnZZ (£1100O if 0.) OOOO pg �°„yH _IIr Q W SSSE,Eilf° -f -1 m- , m D A . '0 3 �1 N (nNo3 CO 0 Z m ~~8 N T j m m e o m g P O 5 g T N N W .. o N Z O O Q wo r r r x m i 0 O 0 0 9 g C CSN w w 8 N w a 0 "o =743 > r ti., o$: o - (p> FA y a " 9 r* is a 0 I lo�; � Ox >>� p :,1),7 im mAov z omoao� PIM m mr m Q m '-1,51 Amo' OP ? DD�+ N IO m�lrr O OOmA O r >? i0: S 2, - fA'1 �n O D➢ AmDJ to CACmON m CAZN I-1m N 0 yy �o� yp-I z'm�1 I$�: oN,��zm r�* zozA�c ro myzomm A0� 4 F: QQ W mZ- XE'U D; Rm';N OtiWm➢ 642,.,Jm CI<�;Z p0 p r g y O • r m N Pg, �Z p0 O 0A DAM4 m& ODp N DN m p Dp ;gym AyC �N MA D **2 OO°'#JMCN Cv -gym Omy �� (-:- ,Z..' S ? c- TJ iVE, A A -ImA O \-i O r * D O OZ. X IJ A w h to 2 ��.I r-. 2 m 9g, c)4, A41 ➢ R3 p 2F.Y 000 Dp mD pAD10i1 Op I8"' g I Z p< mo 0>< OV, ' Cr'm yA D Zz>Z D>A Am 0 ➢sny OJCW 0 a f:,,' Fam (m %.0 t7C �A<_0 1,°.1 V1 2-., as -,12 !NZDK )0 O nm o'x ,0.,-.A E 99ny z m _ D 0 ➢� D➢M rZ CDp pA� i <OVI x mL,, 0,>>, 8c) 8I�.I Apm(NT 1pl //�� S NSA O L0Z mN z %- 0� AZOZ O m l/ r N S� A O-1 mm- OZ E Cp m MC OO JCOm o-x� m r 00 Z Z 0A OA mm _ D P 0 g m T� 1➢A 1�1 0 Dr OOZ Zon m CE a 'l( Z �xZD OZ< ON <AA0 A m 4z 0 G7 V z 2 Inom I, T, n cog 2 7a lCA��m '1'7.853 33 -.'mm om�N m j N,n m p0 OA po5 m ZAZ m N<Oj -CA ODZ�� PP ?1 D II F Tl o C z N� m zln _ Cr-v O • _ow A ti !*ICD m ODmm mI°; z nCZm Z V m ( ] p �m :<D< C Amr rroZp 000D� pi-s2' AC w • N— i 'n co ›0\/ p'" .Z pZ to 100 <NgZ n1A*I ZDO A9Oj- m0( In O N n� S NO Int ON O,Zsj <A< �A� pf;'I y�� H67;.$ ZOIO�ON �fp/1!*11*IN J ? ,Tr D'm C5 C <AD ZR DZ m arm Nm N!O*1p DO DOO Amm pm? A z ,,,, A A� 9 2 :m NOmr Opy m p91pq, M>> P y—u�H 111 T �D �I.l-)O �I- r�rr Nm yD N 'o �i� N �``// Om ym 1, m NAm '41— OZODn _vc,-9. SAZ o N JQ�g>. 'Am D5 m0 �r ➢ tiZD cZ)OOOD COO NZ1nD r- y Gm Z D Z Z 005 0-gr, �C�D �p1A- CAW P' A 7, ^Zm 0 x N 0 WAG) ZC➢ A0x1r- D0E AO D- :! �u Ylo p;� m0 mrtnp Q 0-I fn f. 1I1,1213d OW NolionaisNoo 2103 03Sb31321 litl' = E• t' WI ,F It EOL � � c 8 o 0 -9 i& # uN ':It E N - y ';S a r } E m m o0 III' III I:t n o F );E 2 p iZ t Q 0 x if 0 I €93 x2 :[e� N" a 7 ct4 m oo O CC <a d duc p i� �i >y' u aLco 62_12 CL mz" `my y g� $$ 5 all l IH O a 8 / e v W c 03 O q I I— I I) 3 LL VI/ ,C) C ww w - N O EO , — ,1 mO EA, E° o o' \ /// \ / 1' _ O IPI Oa f O O O O O1 , \ trZ� " 4 b 0 - ii) d wai 03 OIU)\ : xC.ifi yN�iE ?3iv 1IXi' A 1. E° m g i w t c1 'oo\\,\\'' �' mO2 S,y` 111 NO U , C Z z I W 5 �� xS . 1 0 { Y t ., Hco C ne LL = u E /i2I& QQ 1• g Ye▪w ' c 1 9 II LL o gd wl S a b c 4 Lm , a o LL• - W � N j 3 ©� S Of cii 9 W 4 b C C l� W N y �° m L E - > o W O O U C W C (6 H q 3 d 3 LL i E 3 1 Wd OZ LL Zl 9L0Z/9L/6 1 5 1 a t, IIW7,13d CM NOLLOLRIISNOO?JOd 03SV3138 'itLily} IIiØt 0gII ILl 1N `,":; ,- .5,.L. •gIt „ m � /� q3•L� � F ji I� o $R O c Z zz" v2 n LL W z \L 11 N i+ L Q p'a is 1:1—t � �' a" i(pi it S$ v 7 d �'0 0 f4 ga a CD d, �A grna o$ !hit,'i tf Q2 cn a`n` d Z ,Fi x `m E 8 A 0 0 0 (/OX)OC/OOO Po bIL OL-ASL 1--/ .S2 LL-+,..111,,r'P.EffLLLOL I 1 1 a iiil • L II aT 'fin_.- t .E-. • j 1 1 11111 a -.9 LL lail y� ,, 1 - � i I4! Pl -L � I "� '!!!!:1\1! Y �a b' ��.:gli� � © t-az 1 (& zL o-zL Hz, , zL zL q. �„ . I -B I „Hill i - I , • I nLa111@il I I Ili h7;I k no. 1 .- 1 0-- i ''---_ ------0000 -.,_'-F —, Y !,i-• -'- ---0 55 0-0 l R a ill- O .._"-- . 111 c 5 ', --�. + - ` 1 I.1:,.1 : 111, + (/ i ' : wo. 1: __:o- �+ Q- d I� I� �_i �___ _■ �. �� g 0.blg iii-iiJ Eiil Iw 111111:-- rull:aii I — ,::::: 5 ,1L.J,1 I 1;, I ; 11 , o L bl C7 ” i 4 i I 1 I 1• fI, I .. qi e= I «, 1' �, bl 1 i 10 a • 11 a!r 1 !S r o �j r �• r.---T: . Y` 1 .; VAI ti , � A ! I i fig' OR ii, E I 8 A ( ) 4 1 1 at v .J t!. Y� 1�;.. I rti A $L r o-6e L� 'yriasa'� '‘,L,* � 'b(- 11•x. r tti . 0 0 n II / 0 0 0 00000000 F II Q= -0J In 0 0 u_, s El 0 0 o MI o I o 0 0 0 0 0 f 1 VIII: .--. . C31Ci D — ii 0 a Ir Wd LZ:Ll:ZI.91.OZ/91./b 1 61 111N213d ONV NOIlOnaLSNOO NCO O3SV31321 FA It HhIi. '; Ii tc c 1 '— E v �$ � x 8 N 5 E M H ,,,, . E mW 1 ill, 1_1 mince U �� V d �'� ca !III r' ry o o w .2 C L u, E i o m H O z m N1 $$ i E iiil Ili - 6 4E co a`d d Z mz Y r7i fn m O O O w c (6 a `o LL O — II cq . • i • i • 1. • I ! I !ill dd I I 14 s'' • • • O x\ a I I I _ —rL 0 I I HI II i I i 1 11 Il LL 0I 1 s , 4 I I rte, �� - � V IF, 'r1 o oo I o I ng o > J + I O 0 nr� • 0 I s ',� I •Im itFy 0*- —, r1 21 •6y r z MI* i •at El! 'a pa am a > a '/QEF __i_ , ' ■ b 1 n m I i 1111/F ' IIIA. f 1 IV IE:ElZI.91.OZJBl/V 111Na3d OM/NOLLOOi11SNOO NOd O3SV^^31321 rn 1 n 1✓ 7j C M,, i; 11 E E y U O CA t1; i; u v, 1 P C O °�� O III # O d y g t cn 85 W Q E m m . E i , s,;2.,, V �� U O ._LL w 0 5 2 = 7 F1lp it ,- d E C z zo 0 O o8 d �y� a(f7 � o S 3 Cf6 y O ca Qa Sc m in e$ �, i > v <2 a`a` a Z mz y W X111,11 3 kb 5 X $y'n 1 21 '18 I dH Yd 0 g � ! L5'i k 4 1 m slIt 1 ! € ke en m LL o �i a 5 \\ 4�a ��8� „ 1 � ass � ;16 g y� m .5 t Bpu�� v Nae - u�B n a _N�<� 5 ;Few 5 lt, _It., $ ,.q I� 2I_ i,.... g m •, aw ! a h I 11111111111111 _ i 111IIIIIIIII N _ SL,_ 5 I _� -A``_ — ..._._ g �'� E 2 A - } 1 i � = 1 I 1 :';k L Pp ;:' 41 i 1E d a i � c o El �qR k {pp O K tl .1CU f! cU0 'Fr-IL': w :°):1° F `° § " E� os� LLIa 13� f � f � � aO gg�I _ � OC _ SS ♦ f6 �� p � �y >Ut � O � N �' 11 E� Wc°1oI _._-_, >nc �� r 2/,2'4 n L ? ,r,. ,r m s W 9 4� � � L 9 d r �� p rs fly Z ll �1' w R C If' _ _ g A I Vii# 'n ¢ Epi 4 n¢ Q 11 g LL 8 r 3 LL € 111111.1 I U L 1' gs 11 ma=y B I , r»+� X 111111111111 '' ( I 43‘;'f. El 6€,I. ! �� µW C ru —y - 52 3a „ I Gs -{ g H ugYgN a gg 3' e n h - LL� I —E w' I 12 11 II VII t — $& $ e „1 ; 1 �� lii L-1 inry J 4I —I ' d o f w Li 1 2s w € y R V1I $ N 3 ah,o d 4 NM 9G 14 ZL9 DZIB1./V i 11W213d 0NV NOIiOf12LLSNOO 2,1Od 03SV31321 ii L` + = O I,( ll a N o y iI4 It E a ' 7 CD C Q (") O p of^ tf it uN^� ID =i c oit l sm � Iag ;. � �� ;s �'} � o o: jt � p N o 8 a Q1 I� < cod Z mz gg N N i 4 i _� - ` iig I I 6a a1 ;r1 I !' F I aj I ! �� I =t. 1 III. II I 0 i— _ I rlii Ii CH Ei �'r 11 .. Ii I ;� 'i I ILit I I �U I li . j i li i —7-ill. I ii O I h I�._, 1-1'/11111‘i I A :ILI I II II r fI� I 0_ _ _ _A: I G C it 13 0 m § m4 B S �1 i i" f f `f,% I I I 9 1 I ii i II1- till f IIN�11'! 1 i e1 II 1 II o 0 iI -�—� ij II ;I_ • -" 1 Q j i D II 1 0 - i 1 r 1 .,; I` o f o � '1 T -- t I =_ =.=E— . i I _, v- h: 1 1 I 0 -- --r 1l laI I I I I Old 10 SI.Z1. 90.9911 asst saws, nsrwPx9�°°9a9.„ VOI OId 'AINf1OO bmOO'S31dVN W :1 7 daoi°io d'd'�JNII33IoN3 SNdh3 '21'( ?JOd O2 lVd321d 133HS A�lil -------*:=°---- ` t''�// 7,7::‘,':=z-s: ,. •°ate�n�'4°°0 ipue�ue da v 1 . 0 , , . ., „ !�t � "•° SNOLI.DnQO2IdMIIS.LilO S31dt/N �O 3HOS2IOd 'H,�9 Ma,a 91-9 10aa0 ��no� S/-80/ �egwnN qo� 0"A9 Paa61sa0 9190-10 WO 31V0 AS Add N011dINOS30 ASST 9102-4 DVS puam mo F7unoO ad cusp au �l/ 9t-c09 DvN slaams.,A roe ad auoddad V U V I— I-1-1 (I) u) Z z W O Q Q J Q J Q (n JCL C.) I— a. Q Q z O z z Q 0 z UcoF- u) U 0ili �u_ Hzoctp z 222o zo W222o QO V p. wzzz a = � � �III J cnL0 WWWWw J o w F- 0 0 0 O 00 1- 000 (I_) w W — co H Z W > Tc.1co n/ _ Lii = 0000 ow CL a 0 0 1 , 'I •""•°• '0 12l V4O1d MNf1O021311100`S31 121 dYN HON NN1d DdVOSONV1 YISY I.F.O., K"-a •d�eoe,alFl�n •d-d`ONRi33NISN3 SNbA3'2!T ?JOd 432:1Vd32�d W(1WINIW dOO� � .I�,. ten,..». ``,, a� E'i �9�e., ,� l o , o I 1 o ,. 3 a 1 ,, 1 I �� i �.34eosud p.eo,e SNOIL1f1UO)Id aCIS QO 9n:1B a 919010:s 10 Y LAD s`-N` SD id VN Jr AHOSLILi S :IegwnN Wf OYN RBAri.,=0 9190'10:elep ,0-py:,l:ap3 _ "� 31Y0 AMI NO11dI1 S30 A3.1 I I p g ! - .. I 9 91-0Z-i I AI0101w 9wwy 4.000..4 suOI V v • 1 ! 1(1111 I If 1 jilt 1111 II IIIIII 11111111 1IISIII tI " 1111411 11 91599 00 s ewAlan misu .,i-7.1 €: t , s t 1 ase W Ij a»>., > > e, .. . ,.,,e I ! e i \/ ` 1 I min! i III I in J.,. 0III! 111.1111 j ......I l IIIIIif III Ei 1111th. 1II o . L 132 w •• ;alb 6166 63.16 111311x., r' Waikiki. I 1• - 1.13.1.0.1.1. 1 t c E y 1 rn 1eI6 1 j ❑o SEA iii Id did did gER ill �i 1. t ¢ g ILL Hi ti iii IIA iii ri11 'I' f 3!22 : 11 -AM!! M. `exa113a 1 1 1 N I 3.6; €YW ,1� k l�t L ITIS I Itl! ie3 § Se_6 1 �!6 611 1 F: 4 6 44 i'1 t ekea::: i '. !ill itis 1� 1111 f t. i i IIIIIII 11 ie> f .4 f•I IIflift I'. g 1 t „ w 10 g xese z sxs _ sssa ss_ksee e_ex __ .1 r1, { w p e KZ 1 >Lt y. V yy owd 2_� 111 '' f I t I I i 4 1 I d # ' i' 1 111 g : 10 io ; N Il I iS 4143 �5 .kg'$'' s L I II o I Il'ill; f gI i; I gjjj 6E III .;111 Illili' ` 1I'f jl' ' 111111: ;I ! it;1111 ! Ili q ti al ar e � � :4 �g 4<g8 ; g ag g t K 9 i i13II1i I 3'Il Slab l dil I Si li.= I#I Aid 11111/i 11. VIII€Ii 3 �nI I �� z.7=5...... w-f1 I- d u ';g 411:=0:1,0 ,..0.,:=11-16: - H a 4os II II 1 i d g" a y� n n n 1 ! pp 1. t 1: i �3oo r � n(I u o ' I I _ � II 11 ul f I LiLi m I / 1 i i 1 1 I I I r i 11{e s w.: �.. t, ll�I I a a rf�l l J ! 1 F it i ( I F ¢ I : II I 1 [ r I f `�j FIFSII a4ItF !° €F 1? gqt 1•i 1 ( 1.IE j 111 gg1 - IiJI I ' II II IIC...] 1 C...] i i{ II�ls aII IaI� ' F1I$ a 9 I { I IFd �6 I a 8 �1 6 1117x II II=11-1E { 3 1=11=1 111� �iqII i € k ! $ ! iii Ifs l . 1� � �a 1' ' 11 q gg5 I ! I 3: ►, I1 IgggI€ I,. 11� • . 0H re .ig 13. III ° i s fI g I g :idl 12[ I t I FI R dl ;;11ae III 2 :' ga x I:" l :3. : l!" IP 1;n ` e ffI11 x I /: :."I I q li F.' I I:,i: N c X I :,I g 2 J N eJ d� 1.1. u e F Nv Ti m C7U ---1 -.dl 'x? s 8 w IYv :oaE :3"1m Z� ' iI 92a g 0 LL y a.a >, n o 01-C7 :�I I2 $I w4 ...t„ 9 3 Z �E A .1W• v Z wo HH ol4�1X1 U .Fy 6c'"s ii-Wi 6X$8 o g Q. \ p},� va va y •Qa N t m I \ \\\\�1�F n u u ° E u m E 1161 JQ ®i QN n 2 171 8 m N g " } r ia:_AE w dr?1' �p 11`e I -11 'il1111111: 1- d W N O Ca fu } •.t ResJo-iSY f. _ ,, lbgseo a 1 r(ve>♦y v'76� `�� - !' �� - ', h 'lovo'1v/ v ��!€- Q ` g. w `l A. Oikv .0s. I.I�,pnc�� `_.._ 'll� I'vr�s ''r' j>� in i��i 1 K �� a O// 00 III / j o ll� Lt�/t1 .I m Ud w -c, 1 . 11 II':11i. 1 • 11 ** �- ,O i m ¢ rI ,2 -'? II II 11- . • ; f • `,' 's CI / > 131:1 fly /I 1 2 2- p .. 111111' I 161 ,;46,4� Op / a°a u_LL e 11_,,g'-' t Li 1 g it I I r ®� -_-___�` �� m .OL rloJlrj � m y 111 I I I I___ice :� g ,N Am j e --- 7°� l.e w F ,+a - w s. I e.. > /.10%1/, o_._ 0 E a N 5 a .5 1 IE°/ \�� '>-N .le-; 0,or a•v a a n "' " -.:A.-.0. 3NOZ 9NIOYOI 11.� j01'1k , LL ; 1. S `r. Co"' /OI'1� J J 1 u Atli! r�0��i%�0��!/�O�//D. ", N Ig�/�l.n. n g o 2 2 g I ° ,,)`{,X,. DIY?/%1�' 1* t.;,31 v, a� I O`er I II ♦{':::,'} :,l '. c c . E_ I p00 0 00 08 °�IF° m E Q a I oti° • a Nom - �' :'Fcl�%�/ 111^111 Q F0 ,y"g I 1,, ,.9-.9 0o I • a p • o /�.'I os'c y D 5 ^O IQ m E O MEM L° $ 1.0 „it,i4' 14`^113 • Ip0 ❑ E .0 2 Uy' Vii:/° I y od a •c0 a U - Q O 1116 ` ' ©I�: .. I a c W C .}_JOa.� I u till ® o,° E -. m F m v M gwvnv °nii 1 g �> I �otio N M a s v m m • °«� WA 5 K E- a, D i 1 6°. K E o II �° ods 1-QE a Omm �' 'tea �' s' c'� 8. 73. m" J/ p �O a� r E m 3 n a$v a c i j��N `g' I ! 'g°- °-A p y Q 111 0. /I//� y w° `, ' m > i '' ' < �I 'li I an d 1° O O 0 o\ _ 0 3 • 1.0 zr '( LLm OW "/�►�, u-'_ aNga Eli q a EZ;?} Q ¢ I :. mE o U 00 4IP•''.U:r-4, IR� E o Z 1¢i.$v m ami > 43 j 1 I m `m ' 'iIbC ! coo FlU' .tN v>� @ lie y w AA� ` Np. O m t N o m 8 ! 1 O W m N h,u�% Qm m o II o NhN O° ;NO,� 7 " 111 \�1 0 01• Eao �O//rI A l \\� Q O • r E m r h1'i%4 .0 L z }�r rr� ° '�°10'1; �� 3v Q 1 r. `n�• 1� ° ✓/��+, I �r�a•a�%w > , � ` h11, ''' \:'g0� o a \te t y E o ,0"` Ili -- III 1 I ? ¢ i. ,AIlly., �Y�:als. m m m O . y '.1 ' 51!‘ m :•a �.,. oq• l0, J B c:.<, 1 1 II � o �l l��' • �i On...,4 iti �411. /y/..1� 9 ° 7 13:1 131 �'�I+J rr tini11.1 I I/ �I,.rilirto• '1 \ r Q��►`I O to :•• I if C�{It� , to _> I3 > A0 > '1'a% .:11 m o g 1 ,y►� I 11111111 AA e y AA _ r N I,,°�� m " .I \„ :.1 m Q N (� N AA AA Ti :!e A n o I II `y a _ r' . q I• ...,„-,• m 8 ..y/ 11 11'40 I� : o N ®® ®A It I O AAI I /i l; lk. a `'ar p .. °' o t LU CC it w ` ''{'.:}:ill' rn �P!� '/I� in w hI r II /./. ,;, . N v 9 2),3- N / O1 Q> 4 IS -1 W O _--•-� 'I .IAS '15 ..Ilii''/Is.I v ,3 1` LL I:•.y✓: Q 1i> O w v O v m I,7n a D w m I► > .. L. u_d /r,o%I 1 W .,, d• .� o OL.0 5 it 11101.0. 4 15 16a I+ d ®� �� d • cei C•11 4•••••JJ ®® m sn I,><�, I J ~-1 O mvt aaa J7 i ba Q� voi d'c m umi 3 Y. �r•.1 Ib $ W F• N u m m m ~ w ce K to n ��;jl 11'1 1n 301D LL a'C I-I-13 iiiro 41 nl c CO o_ o.°c' AA AA �I:'i i�� 3 Z H WII " io Ino `•;[3l./:' M a AA 8© �A Q(� �U-•%�.... A S 8 f1.Z UhJJ JJN ` I• , `1p I I IlI a i W g y V H OAm P. O _ 4- .4 lulllll�� U -- I/I , m LI O Z N N i9, r 01 11 - • q m iF �I■f / 9 ° 3 Jflfl I-U'.r r.. �• ONI ] y E a� ,I r . O, I ,i'I $ g�II 4t % i I ,'pOOC n0 6000 °OaJo COOr_.2°42o 01%0v(.a raa 1:>q0,%1``°001 \.. -'.r. �.. 06 Ir' ...i E I 3 O C a ai ��° as `1111 9nan `SII. ya�ln �l�rr� n. �I��as ��\ �I�►� �il �1�� r.< ; !--CCH O m c •iiiitilw 1 a� <7 Aga 2 > a s I�'.'I 9 • 8 g p�>LI.�� \\ 2� mm d 'o 2111 1 E = u u QaaZa \ 19 ,�- -I I- 1 NU1 am 7-Edmam . �• -F1 .c E �W y _J L J l• -- , li II oEN e I 1:.'H w m" m" m" Z , r- 0 I'J �o��rn� I .1I W a f9 wo 0 W;r I g•11 g II i N N N d N m y J .1 I 0 III I _ 1iII�r 1 II I_.._---- '':I I 1 "� °"°°°" vai cold'l.1Nf OO 2i311100'S31d dN SNOIlb'l o-wo QNV .0.. a.•ma•..•w° b'd'ONI2l33NI�JN3 SNt7A3'2�f 4:10A432�bd32�d S�lON W1WLINIW 340 m LIN.wO..ma., ,o wem..m.IM..•ia mw oaa•m9ro,.w•.ma I D UoI'}tlo U le } U I '.�..., ."m..q...w... .m ^ SNOLL2RQO Id aQIS.Lf10 Z WJ 9t 904 SD 1dVN AO 3HOS21Od �+,:�" 949040.1.0 ..1..M19q' OYN:19 w.BI..a 949040:9.0 31VO AS ASH NOLLdIN3S30 t 31V0 AB/OA NOLLdR1OS30 AR!) 94109 3 9......4•••O,.dmmFN.N vtel'OZ-6 OYN 9u.unum Nunalped eu°@n.y V _ % o msrn °�� Ag E. $ $ E oe E c p�, Em'_ _E n E. �c Em A&.- .2 ' 1. Ag ;.,i U �30 $1$cmm= ni p mg 3 a'€ mo E$ gQ $ 'mz m 5 F' Tsgz; A§ " @8 m 0- < ring m6 �a of sg SS 84 g�- E ad� m '2? sin gi g .;"E ;gg E" =s mE">@ =tI-O >- 8 g @ F=a -_-__ io B$..„ VW sQ P @Ea = @-sg= s a i =mg e $ sai' a �� d�SE° ogA gn@=$ °'evu� n s 3 a""@E�s g'EN. $.sP "u"8;E E° �g m 51- $ E$g c8gnc EaNA g.'g °U m° a §8=gm -sav- s $ 2E'° E g8 =a° �� g &SII ""='win =mE� 83r a yeBgS w3 @ ni 9 '-; 62r88!i;` SH$ o =3m8= Eg 222§ ES° S'g- ¢A `a a4 E n v E. m E E S !!:Et d�� .Pi! sin 88 E�EAg�A '`sE�mE"�$ sy � vs s8 m3 08 .;goso =�P=� 2Z2 .€egy'A€� �.� �mgnsE � "s OW m =g m W EE°s a1 V8 ��` a g= _ s - z = A - s m@= nrnb " rn�s s �" wg 11�`=EE - gE� mE�E-of -�sa E„° =g'sE �� 8D �EsE 8x-_m wB��Ad $'�s =aEy. x�gs.��s g E - gam z._sg" a�E @ W` �- °� mE nA1? ry "$]A v.Y @N g.. -" a= 0 ;tit 10:$ t 241 - =ug� "mmm 'is eg E cg "E - 8'm - $° sit E g n 'aa off" 5�a a a'"a awE_ L' am8 $ E' E m „ m a F9 ry E$ 3 g° g m �' E `5 c$ E 4 " g F 5 A S c F -w m- rn W a >9c - 1: - �a Ea 9Cc %_ off. . =4 ali A �� =gin till` a ;Ec _��n=or vrnE.�$8om§@'� E A $ `Fa %%g nog LU-,��mam�$� a" �$ox 8m 3'@ ILO B@m s�& E% € m@ ?m "= c �s am r E `e E"ysgr@ w -E amAo Aga` % g sry C. eS m =A Ew8 LL° 8g %Ek gs„.2lE�•E -o s` gag; m rn E o a E t .E a o v x' !Ali a m"rn'm &,� 5 :4.01: E rn a E m$ E o f o E m E n or m a m E a g E' n$° E"m a@ t3 C S 'R E % 8 _ ;ill „ c 5 = LL a N v E 5 c .n21;; w� _ %% s^>„BIE '� E WA; AES 3" 'ssmE Aic _as l9F4 8 gr rase ° �gm=_ pm% - E scto° 'Eg-ng9��` �A °� Ega $F _@ -cm-- 5=sissy- g2;- -� "� `� ° �� n � " >.g - Ehosm E s" � $- md6 _ ha:: aa`E_'E .b..=rP° ga - A= $ g-.�K�a9 '� �'�% ° i: ; __ =�E $OA$ a@'�z° S�•g �� am00 a�aF'.zc €��' ax _�_ �E_8gE„�sw _wQ' aeEEsgSm" g irn > H 4 HU - ii y =--8f igrv_ `18=aw in cam "_ cad c2- s E '�▪E8= c3, ¢m € 0'S E$ m .Ema'_"� _aw2. flu g� m r-n �S ` s9=Eigtg?i! _ -gm Ifthlili m oNfill 8'g_ . mgSEig ,en :EToo=_Ev.-' -_ $� _ gmge _ Ea ¢ ;r ays„ @Dn''= J"gE�c mz"- `: tE-2�' _ .=a°_ tEi $ ._ we '"�aE ag aE.,a�- vryrygg�'erv=$ � a€ag a =%E�� .LLBas�== a8; _ -<< °rn°po.E� - "E ��i$"O gw�8mg�@'=r " gEa� 8 ��dE.QgE - - EmjaEEUmx:; '- n ,-�"°; .r° P14 -!1.1 < rn and 1"s= mEm mss" 8 8n _c�".;` - s -dloE8 8 og8 sgrn = vA cb"EE 2 E $ g °� 8E5= w1' S- � 8 F le �o m`�e- „ " �m �� @s� % a> cE5��@=2; gm o 1-1120;1:1!i . sE $ s arsxg � ° E0EB� %`s�z" ae Es ;D if as es-�a m a �aEgE '@ msg�s� „ a&rP Ea g`s gs cE mr3=8E" 5� gg �� .4-4c a� sflf5 E$a;Egi�.° ,stAl n' a =t=wmH; neOA "_g'Iviio_o�$1 !IE IccEE�°Era8c%$bglr a _g WilcE`E_ tga�2 .e --1;1 �8P em w,M, ag C" &8 nE i@8I ys ._i 8�� @` YB p oEao, _ ��8f€ � a d @gym 8�� gs- _�� " 3 �'%~ mEYE,g=gE gvF $ n vg c nil cE' n� Esc n;m- �m E 5 E�ign$iq°i��=Bae%s �EB�aSt� as - -E �n�mE �88�� t.s�9£g��wAeE vBWE _ =�a=�g�ggEBEy;�< m agA�gSBE'� A og��sq�Eam%nam=E � = 88�5�rc4a EgsaiB@iln-agg_fo m 1g1s�s .� ama'�ie`o= aE" agl algdl�ozuaPawsdsg Pi; dgm�g&= i'fF v'EP 'v €ti=ea=�%l` Adfi.�Ern illlIgt syr tgi�� -E. °"a%$Ssg$�Ssg% A€ 55x82�"�% am `tu>°oEB;o ; gig - is=�'-`evmEEE= mgr �`��8@Ess6a`SasW� Q gm8E8�vg�E�.sE�i��+8a�ffi= -�,.�E�E .esE � �ds��'3'" i-0c �$ mE nEgcmg 8 m ;801 n= i4 112 "iSm Ri$l ryn 2@ '@ si N ry c 8 ic"w'y 8 `�"E m if o Ev1 o ,11cc n6y c" omc�i n.p. lv2'm'nn gi m$ Y$ $Sm Ey SBrm aE Ei 2imi! % 1m 0@ N .Y"amg8`+c n 8 ;ii n ".1 tl 1 .-;N `try ve i. @' n8im E E � - - ryg m�a- ry 3Y ==�9a $ ,,,E " mcg' tln5� "E n� qaE f 9.R8o =fl S Pc`o Yi 1114;0;441w n5 x.` cUm E .=.a rE °81 E EY C gE -8c Eg 5 m d�'d" nEEca$ E. {9.cEc 921 gg ..�_-'� p m�E gE uE $E 19C o& E.`Q.9nm am�lEE '� wmm -_ �_. E Eat mg>.� rn � - '� cs 5$„.�o gmnige2z�En d em �i&Enw m EBig :c' 1mg%c 8 c'cc Eli Evt''=n eE@ i $i. PuBD @_ g�c„ _ 1 Egca?nE�c °m 0g - 3m3E 88,,c � EErS€E E �E °gym m- nom° c�_ E _ - X =gm -�- - g, me o>"s-cr° %�° ;NWti a ffi - c-aw m%n �%. Sa. 8"e@s':��ga =qsE=" x %'S�E� _ _ - gid - _ [n �n 'ern.e ° �gg Ey- s>v m@€ ° -e8a.e�' rnii;i aE�1IPt n4cuisilitl=.sga ilitl EE °="="E °eAo�.=_gm -=n° og mE' g= iiN EilA sls - g v€ 38t._ -;m =Egse-- €a a m -@ m a 8 E n$E u 6 a_ ^m 2 E w p a E A a o a E n _ .a`a 3 'S A imam rn E€@eEa _ " �E °E =Ews�E8E� Em.zc" o a " E E� aEog =rn�mA c$m �dEs .�co Eic iS�c�m o�'�= m� d� t n.E=am E� fid�m m@� �IS EE`_`m-a� E- cFiw cE°ac = �E6 g'E �'�� %2 _c gig°j�� mAEm au�d E o$ m� v g= ms § rvmo itItiz %n s .Otig ; �'mc~' a%.Fsaa asrr�� - =m"Ya 8 ffi - a s 35 €m m.8 61M gm a g ° E $m g=g t.g °�gm =E-EE= ..... N %_� ° a ts s g @ EwAa E .=E g'kEEE'ry°>rn'�«>gl nw mase" w` mg gE n�EaB�s.-._._ UE�i 81'a 9 vni no �EEm m emno_ui ci maBnEm�s� _inn p mE€w,o 2_ $ `�- nen"'s2 m.72i f.-okz 8'0 omEER uE2 L' `�-�E ._ 8 c7x _ /0 ,gz 8 w m X ¢�onrn'm O V Eli 5 m m °m s eh -33"��-`o c_O uyXp .-_1v q$ g e b E2'.8°. m E E z m m E m d t g c E a s''m f E l° ID$ $" E g EE g c¢°c o, a V .. 9 E E I 8 n° c g _@ n e a m B n°1 `a E m m n2.r' ' n 2 1` o` 3"1! €$o '€E @ E m a m E S o2Egmcg_Et - ohiii a°"P� -,,t-i- y cg -FE �&E@ - o -EE ° a LLc %.=go° m 1-g`o 3 E8'go"E ,gs.52 @ gal So mE =s 'CI - 3 m ;�Q .€ 11! a C $ $ P Q m E 5"2 m a x 2.2=12▪ g p �' E>O c._ E E E a m itt`o a y $ m o c E-c m° x o x a x �c EgBo Egg % EdggAA !E`sL 15.1 E."-ma na ��.. "$,g rn m e m = m n=$ x 5 � ,E. $1 S . a mw,; m e c E$' 02 .gi Ea E E 8 cm% gam _ - .no e�w Cc- @ E c �`^i o4L e .-2- ga'' $ry °E'° ,.$gE" -c rn 2 S 'OE v 9 E m w m m m } m °E o v m E 6"n; u'S c s a E a 1 m $c m HP- m w °-t ryv$ m2 .2; 9 E i E I° $ 2 m 'A g o gl !!d 12'.1g-88W2rt_za- I Y , ° A PO; y s orb. is m o "X2 �i @ III. `�'$ N' 'Pi rnE cm ry 8 EY .a F'=Y.$ s D Er.m $ e E 'gra 8 �5g n $ 'Pi 3$m om �tIM;11 i 1 - E i-16! L E&s -%S m Sa `8 �E �$'v'`m -mg t - g °� 3 �' g a g r a TT-��_" 3=o@ n_m` a 2 v '_% o C.L' 1--&s b g t g c$o' _ n2 g at:22 - • 5 EE `=gr-• m@'c 'o m@c- - "eol A c 9. ., -.61 j,-,E3r,E' E`f2.t, qm EN"'' Mag$ = rn` 22.9',1 �`c %_ gw a gip' oa oa %o 1 F nEp_m@,e E1r 13 arses% o; gE .g.2.2 z' m 8$%am !DI % "E9 ;gm ; ;11!.WI° mEo agog ss s s% Lisa m10Ev g2a"E ,E=8`A ' 2_ E !'01 fag i'180 ;� $o fi - Ano JW4 Aim E o Un mi_sc Mg FF ca -.'F=E mta o� E E° Eos %E�am „�nE ;gip �^� „-ns$Ny_W � � g� LLoo� =rny�� =-�E� m ��'y� � 2,=-2. __ yin= �.ry =�3g " $dE=.. &'�_ $a?_'. 6 3 cz,E ossV. $ ' s „.sa Pg „-ME E m 'eR2 a os Nm s .21 . ”!§, .bAEmB _gEE _AEP 3 8 ESC- E ill 1^ $g'm BLL cn°� �c>,g$ry !”. m�' Ev Ep mm EE- m H € msg° gg �gm x gm P = 1170: mm@v7z'E °iia a.a gg1511N _5S_.`s g a a$c " 8-'8 En S' .%c vc▪>' of m @ 25'212 � 8 ae g a E�=NB" `'E @K� 3'. eg g E85 as@ Sit2 m g R Aa8=en = :i! s m r Egg E!; m' 5_.g. = S1='ag g.�g E § g y $„�a5 P E'c@gg-a = S`mc' w ._ $ Er n$ ot•._ 21 gE E a MT =g- ?-1-'12T.= 8•= _ � s €$k'gg tg �5c0: �°$ sy,E�mEn .. w❑ -mc EE ',“. R,”. v $ 53""� °p@ «E_unEB�E 8g„'L % 8 8-%= $ 8 �mg g . .`5 .. 14.-1 h �m a % >cg a`9 g g§$r-- m�`°a k . F E ', E R,”. gg Ela$10yri nw5„ cU% p = 1 E `m P,Ei'ng=vo E nE g�E E ��E�E � �� EN'.LLe EaF Bi@ � � ma%SwQPg= ��:w "g88n ES z' rv.na vn��agk 2a E"n g�+8 min m5_u^ u E m�g,� ' 1!2! a agA n; [tEtg E2 }t sa= Ad. T;° qg mmad 1g �e Egp itiRE u�9 E@�Es;A@a wil q8 gs E; 3 .f ign E d cwio_n� E 4t agog 6 If E. EE..m_€o d - - - a ;B,EE" nf, ,m sA m g „�;A rns a$9 �Brn @ E ag@ a� 5^cm E 5=W EAm rvg Em '1 �� a$E�iv y tuEy'(7 m g"� �y'�Ev aB'm Ec na n Ell t�'3=Es E$E rvn�€w€ E - =3 %%�$y-��$�aaa �eg ga ` aE rn rno E 1II a nein 8n gsdg - -21;gf Es"gasm°gay Eki rc mn2 a= =E>.ayla= 2$,t.g'°e� m= ;" E ° i3g g` 1 .q "; g`gn if g E"mom" c "aa "kmomm 1p. gsBogys ; c „g od _ $ k__ g n ga.=_€gx "`& A ._ r-i4-n .10;11 _ �0 7 -sa rnii'mea sE2 �aEag m ga ,-J1 � g'_wEgz'@1 E`foI> 8lnel qs gE c�g2' o@@m°ac Eu awes „52i o @mw° @gym v o EaI"3 @@�o,p' 19�' "rcu� E'mgo ..b E-g g� mC0 Eg.o A.m.0 - m>Eild3E8 L tab mm s ti A l'ilg „i„aE SQ�3vn c ^rn'�"sn,ry> a gas N Ev.�S'=o g8i'ng sEE€same "38a° 1'osi"; �+o `tl a$ mmc �E rc >.� rn E;�c� 8 g gd co 3NoEAuc " .e``O3 $o g @ ._ mtag.ca a gam- ';.g m"` °a;b�y _oLL -E3Y "Es as$¢sE uAa g� gA EE „.g2E3-82N2gatn$'xwcc�1.0 .. Y.yE's°-E' F' F'� : 1"' k; AggEB E- av=. E3.31gZa wg I E.@a?o@ co"1^"wcce7° go` 9`EEm m zAc$y .. a yy € m p� rn @ O1 'cc '.7$ uJd CR1f'.CLD '� m'6 leo i', A cAl§"'bh ofES aw$i 68EmEoEn_1Agammo m -e '�.6 s o w"� �a m, m = '-2 =�N 5� Zg 2r s s y=8 s- o _ is o o" m U a g EES;EJA $EE"i.dg�tl Ec @ pl °H9m54 -,-`ct �g mSm I'll vE �1' c$mE a .q v�L $ o 11 ..5n>sg;gvw=mgg N 3 gEo mF.Ft�.w>§ E' ��n ffigPm " Ei „E Er m E"n "cim nisi 3+ ,m•= E_ m m=E Sa'.�Esc no ua 8., 5=o=$Eg m yyg,c 0 nE6 ii!';51J4 4.c .Y 1' % i v n g m a°n$"m m €E %^"2 E q �'5�l$m J g o v't m m$.- $ E @ o,c w g a y E'o'a o$!E, _ yy .. E ag .D aE�I E'S,m Ec€cc c -_ =Eo a%'$E'-m m " EN Ne - @S E%Eg@ c;toy @ x .tE= %E g';tii % m E$sa § % tg%Eia ogso - a m dv _8 9g TxoL 87.;8°81282240221Eiu S" s wg "Va�?;.gtgo@e s ~ PIM gEms�g a ' E°"dsE Ev:E EBS .s ' ` s"�L U og' E- 18' Q$" c E E E �Em E g 2 sg> n %9 „c�P E a E EQ` m a .5 a= ;E gg,tig E.E c E.0 5O m nn$ 't m 4m.c-Ec'"rn°t`'-EQ 8rS 1 E E.E $E - cE c wb g $13 g0.711 2 c=n E _ a E @2 E a'i a' m _ S�i EE�mo Te SSE mE y ;= FAA. 3.EEE$ESig" -EN "% t?E` de?=gE.`adcer°F E 2 . aw. t2 s-- aSE$gog a82sma -8gE=sin:az E@nrnog -- O1 ci' E -ae _-AE - = aaoa=5 E ma Z v5 >> ° mg m Etvg c -ate m ,� $a m e ° EEt.n ..�i4 g`: - @„ cn c gEE€ n N _ .. =c 2 4"r,,` m .2a 1 h 8'gc .s qva�m oU - Ea ..t$ 4 5 E'"._ c19 g' m �'' n€ J9 i m E F?8 Q i t t E 12"m m P m w 'of a E o a o m ;--:a0&2 @ t'-�-➢ ;8 m O T'F ®o n n n n n n n m E E 9 E g E g E g Q $ 4 "g i s$g �'m E i m` E v 5 @ g g 3 .c 3 g 2 m ao E o . m._-3'._--mgg E La 2 1m=3c>. m mg E $ C z E_ , cm;co eat g��-_m8 es mgt%„t,E r .g mscm dg E z � s.E o- osms� f @ V c EEms "gm�9m6� 8 n"g 'c = sh in as g ' 5,5'-Z22 m mv3 m "@ E F. m8 E-cFi _ "¢n'SJ° E,E n E 11108'tgA, p ..W2g. ES min' 8'cm°.c,dg.lc> x8iasAE e @ egg segs' `0 .22';2:2 m3.8Jgs� mmt'"EE• c aEm�o @ ° "„n v9c 9dgDo o- vcE'E o. 5._= E rn^Ega $ g Ua a m n'•' �'!q� $ =E!..' gym rv'c P°. - _ °' � �(7 S%ng e�£�mm• vE8 .. .gc_ �E Fn` E .=n@r�- " d EEg "72flcno �m n4 - c = E E aE.,Tgm.E I =Eras d!x% ikPa 5 !it - 1 1g - = 3.2"imp ',F '<1 m - g 2- .0 _ a € "E� 03 %: cm m;E Fc vmy"=" _ aim g.z EE°'�=E` t_ � � a-'0 oE° S �i` � � n urni - -Evt x. m g= .,`c- Ag "19PaF9 E m$ ma °=cE g- g Eg E- - a^pEN :c 5 tl g dEl� %sE of g ;.�t� B s g o c '% s.� �@ g 3s _ aF_ mss g g a 3m8 `� yE E=8 gP ;�_ fig- ;off g b4S O o5wg8F E @ =°-gm U mo ".Ec Wg� mEgF- Eg a8 � a`@E_`,Ee @$@i " gn5 ` rnEEom it- a� ?-� f - ° _ `tv !tkin .1:114, e a 'E $ -q_ cm m, _m-5 .. . g.. C 3E cmE6,g2caE$nag9E8a"mgZ-argt. i� raagta �cEm$g"b22';$ c g 2 %1 Ez 2rv''rv`P Fa 3 $212f 2g4isi E8 0$ E@ '$'��c'ng$ Er?s�b° EvEizgSgFn2.'5. E O 8@ @ENmmi gSF� an.'e gEg 41.,„ 8 E E °S'8i,"i; at %s .m > ` _8 A s%s- c s - t=gq= mgr„- 8 g E " =ESA o = 88_�`m� zNag mg @ i mss „ = `g8 _- O ^mr-' ��E E°o 8!-Ise g So - so "@ m�asm9.@a E N 2/ - Sg .msl$E 9E 12 ,tgE;<oga" g> @g a _ Sm IEaEoEg e E V8 0 rvrv- - g' N @s` b `%g,i « b Itiai° = Esv� - _ �"= s�EWgag i V a'- E£ '"Fie �� N._ w m �E`o be E '>, m >Z � �_$�'3=E >.�co=� %b mSEa Fi am @� .E win B' a&1ti 5 E,,z...m=Etl 8Oirsa=EEsm = aq 0,282 " mQv - i =It E- ' a8 =g- mm=E � F s' sin g %rn,.= v � a9E>dF';. a��.°�gAEA ,E° ._ s�gEyB ;t= s=_g_'E @ c � mmmmmm '�tE` °fin =E LT 66nn�. E�,gng - cE��a= E- �t�a a�$=�c�g� _ E n.- s - - Emg " g g2EE' O FI »8_° Mg .G E 8 m i $m 7 E „g' E a t@ Evq g "�.a m,s=E - - sg& °;gag9't8�mgggiERE -E ._ .1 rg U gE sv� sofa' 'om mea ;__ ganga 3m �d %"s aEmg � - s � r`% SA%g.R°'emgm 3Em"6atgsm"�rBgE„gAEs°"a `.9 .W " m EgBAd o`§ -gp _ o� =ag'm "' abs Asa SASE"�=�igo="m @_� � E.� E c @ `v F'a%' %g 5 "ES c 'm$ '� mE E m co$a E. gE g=" c��E.cooE2cc7 mm -U EE �$g 'rya 2m ;"8 y Ea V o AEE._ 19 f ".� _ 12 � , =„gs =s= 3E� gEa ggs @ necEEwoB�c $S% l',.. m g %SgE gE" q a,s2“`e E$.gcs"2g=E .B mg rnag A� @s f0 mgm 'o$ 2112E @'m$.o°.Aili&�$'_ aSm m1E1P- qU-ci. d a°9v1F - - C cE -mg E '@8Ew ` m E °m.�eg c -gram$a g ° Eg yy w_- cg " -0„250s,;26. 2E w gE mE vg . Eat. - - m._ E �= eE kiEr %E@� rn Bali g g" m If W fl- q'- 0 c E0 nEE E W 2- rnE "2= % 0 in m,gm� W E a>.$c m„aK a E ,'-a -o =E n m a m on I N- flc„ E mLE Sv YIL�jO cl m.L'3'cb E�aE mU.wS �� y U J � gAm - m - - vmiEE W 9� �'o 8�wm'goEaai6ov -"EmB%rn -OAEEii "8-n1 !i f,NIY'1S N n€E $g go int ''E o~ Ea !" Sim gas tl'imw= '- %ea° 'o.rm° E gory3� >.g gs E4'z so_ E 8@ m g=- �, r�v � ">%m 8 -$-" �E�=y"R ag E a Sruao _%a ' �An"gg>eE8!!!v@N8 @1°nEma - 'it rnwg'�Egc '- BaoE wE$�$ Rin PPEE 2 A- EWc m@,�E' >= Emp3°mm m ab -mfE%'E-21i -'rn_;a%-:1 N »F+13c •'2c - 'g'- Sigg�'v yyco $�yFg _ cE�m-g5�29gA _ y FSLL wo n<mry d FA - �� -.� .Em °' c��'� c E gcn - -oEEw -gE @ m gmE _TI ngit! N c S _ ocoE c nE _E.2 a .@ c1§St m -Lv lg mEED% -rn ,9m E `m$ % tgP EE - mg8i -n � �a gEm7='Sg�, m .E � .P P� N 6 8 8£ 9 �._ oE�t rn�� g�.Ec��'�9'�cz 8v�� a o -Sgrc sg0,!1s2 Ea ItsnAlgq 8.da aEg`gEgaaf°==mtgEa f SN; 2 E1-...E rcvn aEW ,,4 A NE]gg �a EuS saog Nm'Ev,Ea3agm'Edoa a1 f s��dEnmsa�=nx� >8=s""$a�Emg` rn g..`2ws1gsarv°n a§88 c oNg c �agaEv a �� mNE SBm rvsmffig� rvMoagwmn_�eEarn u _ _ " do m � a01g: m nidal O E v ~S g '+ "5 5 {_ 03m= a'{cc inn dr H a `E e".o`- (..� 8 rn E 'E m 9 n m g o$a g -m n a 8 E 3< m. e m u R %` m mg as E$m= `EgaES g m m !!! . 2 oo $0 3N ggL am'S w "'ao o E $ o� m �mg ei80 8Saw" ;¢ =€=ryry Sg$a 2,23 U $° c '- a= % >.� ng E, Em,~ nu�$4 n� Eo Em SN yyg $x''19 aCo..Egvo`o Etl aEeNc I $ a €_$S Z' E" -ms E €z g ESEP9c E E �yv m9Xc ASF°" . gAQccd EEDg Z a g g gg EES .8 g Et = , € m2o =Fm gggF'srn@ p iFS 5 .. g. Ec9c tz.g- o: o "@ ga112t qw gd2aA 32'g E3aass._ag$NFcr^J=m 1.2 m�' Z g b %@ Ira !gLaIkilE?&ann$o Ft so.EB. s8os5E� -v m ask" _1 2 hill gaIrki v8 wI Eryg�sado Es E ca„ E%?$m €s 8s 8ry -. 2=°E8.:21.'R3 o -i ota ma " 03 8 8EttEE .1 .2.. $$o.EEpe--1Em§"U8" `° W d - E $E -a1 a 1=lig'Eg2 !; F= $ E2Ea m @m $Is w rima gE-lag `�'=i $ @rmo`' " ct E me g0 7 `E€o saelrms W Eg vt s E -N. N,4 grn$-aE g ma a- _el Elgl`;gEs sg 1"g= Ea"E%%gyp° gs 8E aogmEg r? 2- a `gam=„ $ sge;<A"s ZO m = .;o aE Es SE S.g,g EEyE WIWgiiiilllil °%m8. Ey1 ms B !OW 01JR• ).0 ote �E��a E� EssEa msssasl` °�Aag=m m # W Z .e rn g g s"o� - oE�E- A# fir n ..s s^dad - ){ +{ 1 H NM2 gills= 2sam"m�' E"Ega- s€F-- a 8. �E'sc a"n.$ iaE&„8hE�Fm•a 5 `o'$ >,og rn- 'EE i { Sv .9c �FI`°E012.5m%>oE-Agt,01- 025W - Sa E" o`m i . a@aimmr = a cl ;Er E' -m E Emgm €s $ �a g m= �� m %� Erns ig ss �5�I gq gt`wn g8.1°g °gs 2g ; w El - = o-& AE FgrEg_ s aim '�'E= aF3 �g mE i EE 6 =gE ter= „'„eve"E- "' eyIy 11t j y r ag°$E Ii!! E" lex @g0fn gs1 g2 - Aa11d 1 1 ! $ d 74a =5 wga� eizo Ec- € I �8a Egwa� 921t g a mo ess%rn,e;E�ts;, °1111 Es td t11i1 i ' 111 , 41f, _ ea8` E°Ei m ig Sg 1132! a .sE E1$ E % goE 8 g � 4 Y! iwge' PA _4114aoa$E E Z_ m o! g or i s n'&s8r = g1=gg=,= S=vdgF IgE i c _"" g inns gEseEn t8a # 1 F >g .,.m2 a o e 5 'e _ "Eg8 E ag _ 1} m r$soo gW y 8T' z 6 ° m E °�E$c=s3 a g'g-j-ms- vis" EE„m „] m2°E"@a ys + � R ° p 141,:42 m;_ EiEvo�Eonmgs �v W ao �'m5l � .€=��zEe m s"'� mw= g _ `E@iEgo2segg%m $m�-°s"os P. t t+i i 1j. Q A��'x�`°�as�" o- n�sm$ EE E gl EEa= = glil g$ E Na. 1ETi E s_nElF gL";tgg1= = '=morn " w i}l j it tJ i m -=mz! E-�- 'Bea ii!1411Mill LL 16210114%.q111! as gwrc �a.a� � � 8� @g g �E e ° S a -,! 16 y � ' "@ @.goAaoys 8Ea P 8�<sg- °8i` 2 m -EE sm�mu� i m8 dein f ag °` r`.. _@ 9a 7 m SE mE ;aomg4��`En3m-%@ @Ea'@acm gaE= m & 5 i it d d i i i.,- .,,, - -m>$ c %w-S cg„> a m' 2 E i 5 4z EE1E ala win A111! Elsa 8r c $a -cE E° n %-"t5 Ew 41 ; t a B,;, .I'i R,. CI _ S'tEo,q, Aaiw£�cb'OrnE ihi aft$ g N 2. ET cg� € E$o"�, m8 m E- " -_cE egg$ =A v%m�cEEsag� o�_ $ n .� � � r =rns@ mset�P m U` � E %uQEE os '8c S:Pn�.E >Y � o.s�t n"sm .mins-$ ;L`Ea °sssm gg sw y n 5 y d � r; �am.;8=$'�g� a,@."E s - cs E° ry .n oa do Elms 4m } f > 2e Ems E� Sm �ccEEP�EEE`8tla`o a E_- m gs. -8 m5 0 ag EL . "� s� Q-'m 11 jE c °O E$g" mc�=82i!`1111- Z . E n S- '�T b- ".6oE i4a �$ mE im '�E 1, - .�°��' ' �yy-a�£�° ° @ - $g m @ %v�� m� ;fe gel m E Eta Aga g�= gasaa X? ��8`m e '°- a Eg '� �`�%��' `� 777 E e $�c�gB�xmS°a�'r'�-3aacm � E 8g"=_Emss '-_� -r=gE g ga'v neg� ='g gE m `- = ms g-=Eves `sins �A$E�E" a t Q 2 g amain _gmtamma "'n ° asE % ,gym=ogErn %s86 amEs. g..-§jrnr, v ry E.°a g'ef, ao;gaEB-8 E"2F "tE_ 1 1 C� gym ...0t m A5� E�'c '°°ZEg"n =g¢8 m.2,,, aowEeEm g' N coag ..g w A 2gEgag2@ �gg.S '• A eel �E i8 M dEEmB% u�° @m &!a="E' � EWA @ sow> '`=_a m =Fogg g'o mm s :S- ry 2N n3 „ cE y rn w{ mOgt";cE- E c3S i<mm mg E.R E cdvggaa mEcm 0 C - - O �. � E mp1 -EE�m g8o >ra m acs >:Sg Em t0 � Erni "3-`m EE. E�$° yE`$--a'S t @a Y°aa€ mE F' n vE^J`•PL -@E$ Em.A 41 E ffqq u@`I� amac-«.�o -E rn an E2ee 0 cm ui q 8 o� `Pte 'm E rn m _w- J c9E m .4 d nFi- 'f'1: O g E�c E g 1'8 a=E E' r 8 f A . E c Q ° - c s18 2 0 0 m y 4FmS 0 8 = S� tiEaa85�P `ma 2443 N m E�O-. Wel$Ag'o vahee E 9m �m a v ° SEa"BE'a=Eo a�aa$ac._ s og O e a2 gi.,8�sm3a$„3`EV.Aa E$os8S88$g m._amm E8�3Ea m c rn oda=EE .!S 2a EagNgE asB " dP vim �Pc En.`+iii3eE8 m iffiEEEfin ... ..mm.9..m...... 1 e9Ym 0• .n VONOld A1Nf1002i3I1100'S31ddN H1210N Ntfid NOJJVO 1 �`R 'r i o�TWd.9P•o "Vd'ONIb33NION3SNVA3"ZIT .2i0d032iVd321d W(1WINIW �QOQ _ SNOLLDRUOIld dOISICIO ENO s�a 3H1:19Omo,a -9o- 91 {9:WO EVO V b'N .211Nyo S3�d �O �H�S2iOd .o-aZ .,9MoS 3W1113 2.2.0 N BO:wa 2 c_ 8 3190 ABASH N011dIH093a ASN g" 9 =0 8 8 2 c o 9L-OZ-6 DWI 9luewwm Nunaa iad euaeuaH V g g g o a m g g ;a S 9990•9 ars Tomowlurw020sum9y..H .7 R om>,oa s 55 _ - 8m il em_� �9a m� 0,m S° 8 - E. e c t2 EN V' Ear 8 ="ng'9 A 1 °� z Ea V ._2v gdEPl g.- �' _ 'E w8 `og V CP Pe 11. 1t! 2 E0 1ifn 50g xf i„ 2 io' 8 and 1111 maE8o g Wg' s z fJ `8 - p r8 tL. §1 Z E mO&8 c 8 ,F s �a g s! E m gE9 - E RE H 8° 5 g3 g 0; 1! �9g$w� ~E oo d E ,§- 5 E X g ai o ' o t �.r k k' a m 8 Y 9aE 8 d$��3 t rot 8 �E c A g o e II b ' `Sy ES movn'N 0§"1€� ` m 8 mm .Em 5 .§' c4 z tdg. gwcc�ig�coE aN mt = s� m 8x § 8 ffis 7 o m� t_3 �� AS ._ m` Q 9E979e _ m� 'nageati E�E E$'S'�c E°G cg E`'y V v qm - gg E` m a=o 31`0� u�mm �_ qm c o m 6� 2=3_o ,..-62.b n m E m `Ji E .m 0 9 E$n u '0 5 nas �& Iy roS QED f2 SE'oa� .. n c n_` eE 2 0 $m m 0 H N w a z 28 C' 8 ti� z m aE oE =m= E52 w Q o9 -gag - Et . , .`e '� s° E 2e= Vi o �� I I gnv tcomma "Em ` _g103-5 a 1 8 8",d� og�E w baeo sg 8 g <° : 8- s . . 8 c ! 1a" .2 mgn 8N gom gfl m9�8,� q `u C 6 Q 8m 'a - n cu o n 5 .N c; E :? d' 'Sc F6 �0wa G' m • • 4 m: ,5 8�'-= n ofg' x..i I o Ko E- z�oa zbE"` '=m$IIE ". �I w, v - w8 S cogs 3 s" m 8 m' w�5 O a.`$e-" .-z a3 w�wa od8 8 a ' o>ma comas O rt E ay En'om`� a m v m„m o,w s" >> gra -�' .PE °n " ; _� -'.p W s"ams O E g�. sgmEso 8 m Eog.m� E 8 be-8a a 8Ec 019 1 z H ea= - t sEA' 98.8.. E 'e -' an a_ mg3 _ _ g YsF 2`g m ga ! o E` s-e xE-O a a - E g' n, 'a _ E ,� o g v ab otl 8.„8 4 WWWW� WWWW� WWW i WWWW M.� WWWWW wa I m _ E a= m 8 § a a� E g y m o d trih� :��pisiri�iirdit�i�i i,�Jrik�edi o> W E wE m�Ern;_14> C - Oc � vcw m E m as oiy .� 1-8L= 119 a=taa °.' E E 9 m g=m> t t g' ngm� a �—. " g v g in m` dI ____�.Elll�a�lll�� "� Y g86r�$�_Ev EE u8� .°'i g 3 8 m >" - a 5 a44.28z _ eg mew Sa A o d aim -zm d o $ ' �o O o d8-2e = 1 it Z Film ffi c a Na 8 0 "% 8 m o, Eai k a) m 92- y E- E- . ESA �°"mEa .a , E2m•P o r�oyg o = v=„ vqg E es $ a g o .3 9= v�� g3 8 1- ai 1O ig I IIm@z.zmia 8� �� §8 C� m _ ��9sgv a �° 8 " Z a - I �II d figiie ! -e ug g n'� s E o E C ga mvn > glg 0 U' 88$8.3 g" g80 F a8 �8 F 3 a 8 og2 g98U E..7..< 3 _ F- s „ Z [Lin Illlo�ANoM Meq Z O 0 ,i,r. . . 0 1- sr / r w i 1 = . E3 u 0 „i ti., 3-- ____ ti-v, i �� `0 Ivo ter. ♦.!p ,�•LI J ►�i`�► , IT.I I 3NOZJOOI`I' � ++. x A•�, thi , 6, {tiir r — .1. m. =SOMME** 4, • r, r — ` � .' r«� z-N go g %?r �' Iii I 8Ir4<5 og 02I =3 2 � ehyo • Oe o Sze49 > aliffg>aa L i' J �u3i;ydY Fil 41 1 .,4i4 1 O9 il i 1011 W o dII• IWI � , Q w0 ? m 4 w 'o� =maw Q co W k' 0 ;:��j►� 0 11k_ _nom..t)4w.:„.. .....„..A., ,, ‘ 1,---,, ,A,immvpator. __ __ r r " IN: ::: _ ii,,____ .;.:, a g le ,. _ , „mghot ,0* LI • - . I I-_ - ` = AWit (inp►�I kil 1 II. 1'.I ri 1 liAP I. oi 1 VU or / 04, , 6,. 'AV 111 . ix)N9 0 I ' i 4iii re i 1Amman 71� �' ' wr L 11117 I .1411.111a.- IPS►. __ taw' �� . _�• ' '' a. kgidor �► 1 Irl i ,f.; liil rNii: w q \�`i X�z z p I •'' nl 11111 LL J Z 2 --j'.k3 _11_ Tiil Tr- __ u I '� �I-r._I I 0 4 : 1 , IV ---J L I J e as.. HEX 6-23-2016 • DR—PL20130002268 Ann P. Jennejohn WALMART STORES EAST From: BeasleyRachel <RachelBeasley@colliergov.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:53 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: Smith, Daniel;Ann P.Jennejohn; Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael; Kendall, Marcia; Lang, Ashley; Neet,Virginia; Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: Walmart DR Request for Advertising Attachments: Walmart Request for Advertisement.docx; Signed Page.pdf; Walmart (2X3) Map.pdf • Good morning, Please advertise the Walmart DR petition attachments for the June 23, 2016, HEX hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department— Planning & Regulation Telephone:239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 CAA? County Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. I 1 May 24, 2016 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on June 3, 2016~and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Dan Smith, Principal Planner in the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION:ZONING [Zoning Services Section} FUND&COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number: 076397 r1` Authorized Designee signature for HEX Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,June 23, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples Fl 34104,to consider: PETITION DR — PL20130002268 — Petitioner, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks relief LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6, relating to buffer and screening standard requirements; from LDC Section 4.06.05 C., relating to foundation planting requirements along retail building facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.2, relating to building design feature requirements for primary facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.4, relating to variation in massing requirements for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross building area; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.5, relating to building design treatment requirements for all building facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8, relating to detail feature requirements for blank wall areas on a building; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.10, relating to roof edge and parapet treatment requirements for buildings larger than 5,000 square feet in gross building area; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.12, relating to entryway/customer entrance treatment requirements for single tenant buildings; from LDC Section 5.05.08 D.3, relating to design standard requirements for mercantile buildings; from LDC Section 5.05.08 E.3, relating to site design standard requirements for service function areas and facilities, for a Wal-Mart expansion redevelopment project consisting of 17.21+acres of land, located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East(U.S. 41), approximately 1,000 feet east of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 12, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,Florida. I (insert map) I All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. I Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, IFL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes fmal on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101,Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County,Florida 4 I I k \ | § k/ _ O71 / /I . m � \j \ ; ---1 / " \ sR _ i � \ [ � /` /¥ } 0 ¥ ° ;k ! , 1 k} -a2)) A; —§ $a q@ r 03I0 , 1. \ H \\ m} / — ___sR k Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:40 AM To: 'BeasleyRachel'; Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Hi Rachel, I'll send proof for Porsche of Naples avid the Walvv►art petition, scheduled for June 2.3rd (HEX) Hearings, for staff's review and final approval as soon as I receive them from NDN. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 23q-252-8406 Fax 23g-252.-8408 From: BeasleyRachel [mailto:RachelBeasley@colliergov.net] Sent:Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:53 AM To: Minutes and Records<MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com> Cc: Smith, Daniel <DanielSmith@colliergov.net>; Ann P.Jennejohn<Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com>; Bellows, Ray <RayBellows@colliergov.net>; Bosi, Michael<MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; Kendall, Marcia <MarciaKendall@colliergov.net>; Lang, Ashley<ashleylang@colliergov.net>; Neet, Virginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; Rodriguez, Wanda <WandaRodriguez@colliergov.net> Subject: Porsche of Naples DR Request for Advertising Good morning, Please advertise the Porsche of Naples DR petition attachments for the June 23, 2016, HEX hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department— Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 Cofer Cor4nty 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Rodriguez,Wanda Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:36 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: BeasleyRachel; Smith, Daniel; Ashton, Heidi; Stone, Scott Subject: re:Walmart DR Request for Advertising Attachments: Walmart Request for Advertisement.docx; Signed Page.pdf;Walmart (2X3) Map.pdf The following correction needs to be made in the title, but otherwise the ad request is good: PETITION DR-PL20130002268 -Petitioner, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6,... Heidi and Scott: This item was added to the 6/23 HEX agenda after our review of titles for that meeting. -Wanda Rodriguez, ACT Advanced Certified Paralegal Office of the County Attorney (239)252-8400 From: BeasleyRachel Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:53 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: SmithDaniel; Ann P. Jennejohn; BellowsRay; BosiMichael; KendallMarcia; LangAshley; NeetVirginia; RodriguezWanda Subject: Walmart DR Request for Advertising Good morning, Please advertise the Walmart DR petition attachments for the June 23, 2016, HEX hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department- Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 Corer County 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:46 AM To: Rodriguez,Wanda; BeasleyRachel (RachelBeasley@colliergov.net) Subject: RE:Walmart DR Request for Advertising I'll be sure to wake that modification before it goes to NDN. Thavtk you for the ivtfo! Avtvt Jevtvtejokvt, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustwtevtt Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 From: Rodriguez,Wanda Sent:Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:36 AM To: Minutes and Records<MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com> Cc: BeasleyRachel <RachelBeasley@colliergov.net>; Smith, Daniel <DanielSmith@colliergov.net>;Ashton, Heidi <HeidiAshton@colliergov.net>; Stone, Scott<ScottStone@colliergov.net> Subject: re: Walmart DR Request for Advertising The following correction needs to be made in the title, but otherwise the ad request is good: PETITION DR—PL20130002268 —Petitioner, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6,... Heidi and Scott: This item was added to the 6/23 HEX agenda after our review of titles for that meeting. -Wanda Rodriguez, ACP Advanced Certified Para(ega( Office of the County Attorney (239)252-8400 From: BeasleyRachel Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:53 AM NDN Account #076397 Corporate Account #507876 May 25, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples News Media 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 Re: DR-PL20130002268 Display Notice (w/MAP) Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice (w/Map) Friday, June 3, 2016 and send the Affidavit of Publication to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500168030 May 24, 2016 4 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on June 3, 2016, and send proof of publication to the Board Minutes and Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 401, Naples, Florida 34112. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section} PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500168030 Account Number: NDN 076397/507876 } 8 8 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,June 23, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples FL 34104, to consider: PETITION DR—PL20130002268 —Petitioner, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6, relating to buffer and screening standard requirements; from LDC Section 4.06.05 C., relating to foundation planting requirements along retail building facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.2, relating to building design feature requirements for primary facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.4, relating to variation in massing requirements for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross building area; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.5, relating to building design treatment requirements for all building facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8, relating to detail feature requirements for blank wall areas on a building; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.10, relating to roof edge and parapet treatment requirements for buildings larger than 5,000 square feet in gross building area; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.12, relating to entryway/customer entrance treatment requirements for single tenant buildings; from LDC Section 5.05.08 D.3, relating to design standard requirements for mercantile buildings; from LDC Section 5.05.08 E.3, relating to site design standard requirements for service function areas and facilities, for a Wal-Mart expansion redevelopment project consisting of 17.21± acres of land, located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41), approximately 1,000 feet east of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 12, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101,Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida N N-y D A W g P gA BAYSHORE DRIVE LS gm m sQ \ \ r N 2 j m s g d-44k„' oR _ NFp i W �y 4‘ . 6 pi. N MD A/ '�� ZO v O nnp 9Cy j 5� o x C ,V a 2P4 N 2 D D U p N P-<1g Z 0 — CRONN POINTE Ann P. Jennejohn To: legals@naplesnews.com Subject: DR-PL20130002268 Attachments: DR-PL20130002268.doc; DR-PL20130002268.doc; DR-PL20130002268.pdf Hi again, Please advertise the attached (w/MAP) OK Friday, June 3, 2016. Thanks! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 2367-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 i 4 4 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:25 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: DR-PL20130002268 Attachments: DR-PL20130002268.doc; DR-PL20130002268.doc; DR-PL20130002268.pdf Hi again, Please advertise the attached (w/MAP) on Friday, June 3, 2016. Thavtks! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 2.39-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 I 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 2:43 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: RE: DR-PL20130002268 Confirmed receipt. Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist \f t"; itI Lt; I •NETWORTODAYK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com From:Ann P.Jennejohn [mailto:Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com] Sent:Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:25 AM To: Legals NDN <Iegals@naplesnews.com> Subject: DR-PL20130002268 Hi again, Please advertise the attacked (w/MAP) on Friday, June 3.„2016. Thanks! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustvnevt Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 23g-252-8408 Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient,you must not copy,distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. Unless expressly stated,opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Gori,Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:25 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: Proof 1110643 Attachments: NDNB1110643.pdf Please find proof attached, Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist • :Naples DailuSeitT5 illum TODAY NETWORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104,to consider: PETITION DR — PL20130002268 — Petitioner, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6, relating to buffer and screening standard requirements;from LDC Section 4.06.05 C.,relating to foundation planting requirements along retail building facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.2,relating to building design feature requirements for primary facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.4, relating to variation in massing requirements for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross building area; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.5, relating to building design treatment requirements for all building facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8, relating to detail feature requirements for blank wall areas on a building; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.10, relating to roof edge and parapet treatment requirements for buildings larger than 5,000 square feet in gross building area;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.12, relating to entryway/customer entrance treatment requirements for single tenant buildings; from LDC Section 5.05.08 D.3, relating to design standard requirements for mercantile buildings;from LDC Section 5.05.08 E.3, relating to site design standard requirements for service function areas and facilities, for a Wal-Mart expansion redevelopment project consisting of 17.21± acres of land, located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41), approximately 1,000 feet east of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 12, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. DAVIS BLVD. KELLERLOCH (S.R.84) I X ENTRY r I \ RIDGE J LEVEL WINTER PARKDEVOE PONTIC\ GALLMANO / KINGS LAKE ESTATE (DRI) Q'T it �I 12 7 MILLER JJ COLLIER COUNTY SQUARE GOVT.COMPt (DRI) PROJECT COURTHOUSE LO CAT I O N SHADCW5 I NV r 41j2VORNADO LAGO w CULTURAL VERDE OE ARTS HWI'E CRICKET y, MINDSTAR m taysHd1E "�� RIVIERA > \ COLONY 14 13 2 18 COLE LAKE AVALON rPST.PETER'S ESTATES y' CATHOLIC PINESA001I avua"' CHURCH (C.R.864) uKE RATTLESNAKE SOLSTICE THOMASSON DR. la HAMMOCK RD. All intereste. .. - - - -• • .00'. - • •. 11. •. • - - ials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252- 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.1110643 June 3.2016 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 1:15 PM To: Gori, Ivonne Subject: RE: Proof 1110643 Attachments: image001.png Hi again., Our County Attorney's Office wanted me to see if the map in this ad could be pulled down. a little bit, just so you're able to see the bottom line of that main paragraph a little easier. Could that tiny change please be wade? Thank you! Ann Jennejohn Board Minutes & Records Department From: Gori, Ivonne [ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:25 PM To: Ann P. Jennejohn Subject: Proof 1110643 Please find proof attached, Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist [cid:imageOOl.png@o11)107613.340OFC30] Office: 23 9.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com<mailto:Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> NaplesNews.com Ann P. Jennejohn From: Gori,Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:52 AM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: REVISED PROOF 11110643 Attachments: NDN 61110643.pdf Good morning Ann!!! Please see revised proof attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist NEIPI DaiLl? nti I fpusAidatomeopAY Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104,to consider: PETITION DR — PL20130002268 — Petitioner, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6, relating to buffer and screening standard requirements;from LDC Section 4.06.05 C.,relating to foundation planting requirements along retail building facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.2,relating to building design feature requirements for primary facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.4, relating to variation in massing requirements for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross building area; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.5, relating to building design treatment requirements for all building facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8, relating to detail feature requirements for blank wall areas on a building; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.10, relating to roof edge and parapet treatment requirements for buildings larger than 5,000 square feet in gross building area;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.12, relating to entryway/customer entrance treatment requirements for single tenant buildings; from LDC Section 5.05.08 D.3, relating to design standard requirements for mercantile buildings;from LDC Section 5.05.08 E.3, relating to site design standard requirements for service function areas and facilities, for a Wal-Mart expansion redevelopment project consisting of 17.21± acres of land, located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41), approximately 1,000 feet east of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 12, Township 50 South, Range 25 East,Collier County, Florida. DAVIS BLVD. KELLER r LOCH (S.R.84) 'r ENTRY '1 \ RIDGE i LEVEL VANIER PARK _ a DEVOE PONPAC\I GALLMAN ESTATE KINGS LAKE / (DRI) 11 12 V MILLER CIXLIER COUNTY SQUARE tour. Olaf (DRI) PROJECT DDUADRcr ms_ LOCATION SH I I T L p� � VORNADO LAGO W CULNRAL VERGE � ARTS CRICKET O HLLACE LAKE (� YANDSTAR AT RINERA BAY511ptE 14 ¢ 18 COLONY 13 /p GOLF LAKE AVALON .S ST PETER'S ESTATES J 9% CATHOLIC I EBROOK .7,1144. CHURCH (C.R.864) RATTLESNAKE soLSTICE_.� THOMASSON DR HAMMOCK RD. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252- 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.1110643 June 3.2016 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:14 AM To: Rodriguez, Wanda; BeasleyRachel (RachelBeasley@colliergov.net) Subject: Revised Wal-Mart Notice (6-23-2016 HEX) Attachments: NDNB1110643.pdf The revised Wal-Mart notice (wrap was overlappivtg text), that's running this Friday, is attacked for final review & approval. Please look it over at your earliest convenience. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-84010 Fax 239-252-8408 From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent:Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:52 AM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED PROOF 11110643 Good morning Ann!!! Please see revised proof attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist Napir9DaiigNiuts I • AUS MEM DR Y Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori @naple snews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:28 AM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Cc: BeasleyRachel Subject: RE: Revised Wal-Mart Notice (6-23-2016 HEX) Looks good now, thank you! Wanda Rodriguez, ACT Advanced Certified Paralegal Office of the County Attorney (239)252-8400 From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:14 AM To: RodriguezWanda; BeasleyRachel Subject: Revised Wal-Mart Notice (6-23-2016 HEX) The revised Wal-Mart notice (map was overlapping text), that's running this Friday, is attached for final review & approval. Please look it over at your earliest convenience. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustvtnent Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 From:Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent:Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:52 AM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED PROOF 11110643 Good morning Ann!!! Please see revised proof attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:32 AM To: 'Gori, Ivonne' Subject: RE: REVISED PROOF 11110643 Looks great Ivovtvte, please publish this Friday, Juvte 3rd, 2016. Thavtk you! Avtvt Jevtvtejohvt, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustvvtevtt Board Collier Couvtty Board Mivtutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 From:Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent:Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:52 AM To:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED PROOF 11110643 Good morning Ann!!! Please see revised proof attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist !Niiplesardill Scum Iap USA NITW000R,K Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104,to consider: PETITION DR - PL20130002268 - Petitioner, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6, relating to buffer and screening standard requirements;from LDC Section 4.06.05 C.,relating to foundation planting requirements along retail building facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.2,relating to building design feature requirements for primary facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.4, relating to variation in massing requirements for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross building area; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.5, relating to building design treatment requirements for all building facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8, relating to detail feature requirements for blank wall areas on a building; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.10, relating to roof edge and parapet treatment requirements for buildings larger than 5.000 square feet in gross building area;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.12, relating to entryway/customer entrance treatment requirements for single tenant buildings; from LDC Section 5.05.08 D.3,relating to design standard requirements for mercantile buildings;from LDC Section 5.05.08 E.3,relating to site design standard requirements for service function areas and facilities, for a Wal-Mart expansion redevelopment project consisting of 17.21± acres of land, located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41), approximately 1,000 feet east of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 12, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. DAVIS BLVD. KELLER LOCH (S.R.84) fiENTRY I \ RIDGE Z LEVEL r WINTER PARK \ a DEVOE — PONTIAC\ GALLMAN KINGS LAKE /ESTATE o 11 (DRI) ,, 12 MILLER COLLIER COUNTY SQUARE _GOVT.COMPLEX PROJECT (DRI) SHAo OUSELOCATION ry—, 1 N VORNADO LAGO CULNRAL 94, VERDE ARTS CRICKET O nTUACE LAKE �.'p WINDSTAR m 9AVSRORE `<" RIVIERA 14 ¢ 13 78 COLOOLENY m \ iG G LAKE AVALON ST.PETER'S ESTATES % CATHOLIC TEBROOK epTATL CHURCHR.864) LAKE ucE \' (T (_\T 'RATTLESNAKE SasncE�_ THOMASSON DR. HAMMOCK RD. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252- 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.1110643 June 3.2016 ? apLcø BIaiL ? rw!zi NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# COLLIER COUNTY HEX 1110643 PUBLIC HEARING 45-168030 Pub Dates June 3,2016 (Sign ure of affiant) "v;�., IVONNE GORI Sworn to and subscribed before me 4 ••!'�`• irl,„•.'' NotaryPublic-State of Flortdt This June 08, 16 Commission r FF 9 f Flor •�C �. r• My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 1 '." Banded through National Notary Mtn. /{)-0 tk.-41.4 111041MIMPITNIIPP1111 (Signatur of affiant) ' NAPLES DAILY NEWS 1t Friday,June 3,2016 It 15A Presidential campaign 2016 IC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE In pursuit of GOP unity,Ryan ,,,__PUBLIC OF PUBLIC HEARING • says he'll vote for Trump Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will beheld by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 AM.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room,at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Room 609/610,Naples FL 34104,to By Steve peoples consider: and Scott Bauer Associated Press PETITION DR-PL20150002617-Petitioner,TT of Naples,Inc.requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F end seeks nine JANESVILLE,Wis.-House total deviations,including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16,relating to X Speaker Paul Ryan en- " \..:t standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore cD V dorsed Donald Trump's - y Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area;one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, I Z bid for president Thurs- ' • I - relating to plant material standards for required landscaping;and five deviations from day,bringing an end to LDC Section 5.05.08,relating to architectural design standards for blank walls,roof the extraordinary public • treatments,buildingcolors and materials,and parking 4' split between the GOP's a structures,for a proposed C < Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.15*acres,located on the north side of W presumptive White House Davis Blvd.,just west of Airport-Pulling Road,in Section 2,Township 50 South,Range nominee and the nation's 25 East,Collier County,Florida. i top Republican in office. M V I had friends wishing 1 V I wouldn't support him. L Sr • 4) Q '' I had friends wishing I House Speaker Paul Ryan,R-Wis.,talks Thursday with The to m would,"Ryan said in an Associated Press in Janesville,Wis. f LOCATION l exclusive interview with Q The Associated Press."I Paul Ryan,"Trump wrote. struggled to identify a vi- , U Z < d really didn't feel any pres- "We will both be workm working able alternative, any be- p sure,other than my goal very hard to Make Amen- lieved it was only a matter Davis BLVD is to make sure that were ca Great Again!" of time before Ryan fell in unified so that we're at full There are still some GOP line.The endorsement,he •• strength in the fall so we leaders who say they won't said,was not the product Ncan win the election." support Trump,including of any deal with the bit- r Ryan's announcement, 2012 Republican presiden- lionaire developer,but a '@F (2) made in a newspaper col- tial nominee Mitt Romney, decision based on"an un- C umn published in his Wis- who tapped Ryan as his derstanding of our mutual- 0 cousin hometown,marks running mate four years ly agreed upon principles." Ni a significant step for a Re- ago.A day earlier,Romney Ryan said he specifically All interested parties are Invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in publican Party trying to signaled he'd support epos- wanted to go over Trump's 4) come together ahead of a sible third-party candidate epproachtoexecutive pow- presentation before the Hearing Examiner will becomes permanent peri et the record. • Cn '' general election matchup ' stead of the presumptive er,judicial appointments COC against like! Democratic Republican nominee. a0dhis Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be O g y Ru position versat ons reviewed at the Collier CountyGrowth Managementg _ nominee Hillary Clinton. Ryan himself es to ha l- "Those conversations Department,les,FLZoning Division, U Q And Ryan made clear he edged he continues to have took some time," said, Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL had Clinton on his mind concerns Trump's combat- adding:"I feel much more C U when he decided to join the ive style but said afters se- comfortable that he's in the The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person ,, > C U fn ranks of Republicans who nes of conversations with same page with us,Most decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with > Cl/ 0CD 0 have slowly come around to Trump,he's confident he importantly,it is obvious respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of • backing Trump,the brash and the House Republicans that Hillary Clinton is not." that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record < < W 0 billionaire feweapectedto he leads as speaker will be Ryan ended aweehelong of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon emerge as theparty'snomi- able to work with him as standoff with Trump min- which the appeal is to be based. nee when the campaign be- president on their agenda. ones before the interview gan in earnest last year. 'We obviously have a by outlining his support If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation In order to "This to me is about different kind of style and for the New York billion- participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of saving the country and tone.That's very clear. aire in a column published certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Fscildies Management Division preventing a third progres- Anyone who knows any- online by The Janesville located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,Florida 34112-5356,(239)252- ' , sive,liberal term,which is thing about uslmows that," Gazette. 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. C what a Clinton presidency Ryan said.'Butwhat really, Hehad shocked the po- _ would do,"Ryan said. ultimately matters is how !tical world last month by Mark Strain, Trump celebrated the best can we make sure refusing to endorse Trump Ill endorsement on his favor- these principles and poll- once the real estate mogul Chief Hearing Examiner N ite venue,Twitter. cies get enacted in 2017." became the last major Re- Collier County,Florida a) "So great to have the en- As the GOP's so-called publicanpresidentialcon- t'r1 dorsement and support of "Never Trump"movement tender still in the race. No.1110281 June s 2016 K CO PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE a U Q NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING rz M z Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Heating Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)et 990 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room,at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Room 609/610,Naples FL 34104,to Meeting Room,at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Room 609/610,Naples,FL 34104,to consider. consider: 0 PETITION DR-PL20130002268-Petitioner,Wal-Mart Stores East,LP,requests PETITION NO.PDI-PL20160000283-SD San Marino,LLC requests an Insubstantial _0 approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and change to Ordinance No.2000-10,as amended,the San Marino Planned Unit • E seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6,relating to butter and screening standard Development,to add a traffic development commitment relating to temporary requirements:from LDC Section 4.06.05 C.,relatingto foundation planting requirements construction access for Parcel 0,to amend a traffic development commitment to • >- along retail building facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.2,relating to building design 4) Z N feature requirements for reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel B,to amend a deviation qukaman primary facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.4,relating to entry road of Parcel B,to amend a CL variation in massing requirements for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross to require sidewalks on both sides of the main • C >, building area;from LDC Section 5.05.08 0.5,relating to building design treatment deviation to allow fore 12-foot tall fence,wall or berm along the sharetl boundary with E O f'— requirements for all building facades;from LDC Section 5.05.08 Cl.. relating to detail Willow Run PUD to the south,and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect ' L. feature requirements for blank wall areas on a building;from LDC Section 5.05.08 the location of the temporary and permanent access points,and the reconfigured Z a) (1) 0 C.10,relating to roof edge and parapet treatment requirements for buildings larger roadways,lakes and residential areas,for the property located on the east side of -o N N O than 5,000 square feet in gross building area;from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.12,relating Collier Boulevard,approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard,in Section 11, Q C cn U to entryway/customer entrance treatment requirements for single tenant buildings; Township 50 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida,consisting 01235*acres. from LDC Section 5.05.08 D.3,relating to design standard requirements for mercantile buildings;from LDC Section 5.05.08 E.3,relating to site design standard requirements L _ for service function areas and faciltes,for a Wal-Mart expansion redevelopment J c .,.a,JL-�y� 61'0 taaaa project consisting of 17.21*acres of lantl located on the nor side of Tamiam Trail 7/Graf, _ "' East(U.S.41),approximately 1,000 feet east of Airport-Pulling Road,in Section 12, Township 50 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida. i a m I 1"(E. r • \ m a J—,..rrJ �a.�a.. a.e • n.s�MI °MTf I W PROJECT E /LOCATION sal.N "'a' a..o _ PROJECT 6„015 an LOCATION �a /,�� L Imo_ \ wo< 1 ,m.ax., _ „amu e,.. �,e.u."n iY.J I*'IMS u All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. AN materials used in 0 ,`i/A All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used In presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available ane week prior to the hearing. The file can be , Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department,Zoning Division, adl� reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department,Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL. AOZoning Services Section,2800 NorthHorseshoe Drive,Naples,FL The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examines with !V decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,hewn need a record of respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record WA' that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the W CO of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon leat•I� which the appeal is to be based. which the appeal is to be based. 41� 0.areO If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to yr: ale A` participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of LGJ W certain assistance.Please contact the CuRler County Facilities Management Division certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamlaml Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,Florida 34112-5356,(239)252- located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,Florida 34112-5356,(239)252- 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Mark Strain, Tit -3 Chief Hearing Examiner Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County,Florida Collier County,Florida isratitma 16,11111111 Juno 12011 130.1112182 Junes 201e RS er-tiL LL