The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Agenda 06/23/2016 COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER HEARINGS AGENDA JUNE 23, 2016 AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY,JUNE 23,2016 IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING&REGULATION BUILDING,2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE,NAPLES,FLORIDA INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF PRIOR MEETING MINUTES: May 26,2016 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160000263 — SD San Marino, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended, the San Marino Planned Unit Development, to add a traffic development commitment relating to temporary construction access for Parcel B, to amend a traffic development commitment to reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel B,to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B,to amend a deviation to allow for a 12-foot tall fence, wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south, and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the location of the temporary and permanent access points,and the reconfigured roadways, lakes and residential areas, for the property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 235± acres. [Coordinator: Eric Johnson,AICP,CFM,Principal Planner] B. PETITION DR-PL20150002617—Petitioner,TT of Naples,Inc.requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks nine total deviations, including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16, relating to standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area;one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, relating to plant material standards for required landscaping; and five deviations from LDC Section 5.05.08, relating to architectural design standards for blank walls, roof treatments, building colors and materials, and parking structures, for a proposed Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.15± acres, located on the north side of Davis Blvd.,just west of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Daniel Smith, AICP, Principal Planner] Note: This item is withdrawn by Petitioner and will be heard at a later date. C. PETITION DR—PL20130002268—Petitioner,Wal-Mart Stores East,LP,requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks relief LDC Section 4.06.02 C.6, relating to buffer and screening standard requirements; from LDC Section 4.06.05 C., relating to foundation planting requirements along retail building facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.2, relating to building design feature requirements for primary facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.4, relating to variation in massing requirements for buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross building area; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.5, relating to building design treatment requirements for all building facades; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8,relating to detail feature requirements for blank wall areas on a building; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.10, relating to roof edge and parapet treatment requirements for buildings larger than 5,000 square feet in gross building area; from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.12, relating to entryway/customer entrance treatment requirements for single tenant buildings; from LDC Section 5.05.08 D.3, relating to design standard requirements for mercantile buildings; from LDC Section 5.05.08 E.3, relating to site design standard requirements for service function areas and facilities, for a Wal-Mart expansion redevelopment project consisting of 17.21±acres of land, located on the north side of Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41), approximately 1,000 feet east of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 12, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Daniel Smith, AICP, Principal Planner] 5. OTHER BUSINESS 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS 7. ADJOURN AGENDA ITEM 4-A Co -er County STAFF REPORT TO: HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 23, 2016 SUBJECT: PETITION NO: PDI-PL20160000263 SAN MARINO PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner/Applicant: Agent: SD San Marino LLC Alexis Crespo, AICP 2647 Professional Circle. Suite 1201 Waldrop Engineering. P.A. Naples. FL 34110 28100 Bonita Grade Drive#305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 REQUESTED ACTION: SD San Marino. LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10,as amended, the San Marino Planned Unit Development to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B. to amend a deviation to allow for a twelve (12)-foot tall fence, wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south,and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the location of the permanent access point, and the reconfigured roadways, lakes and residential areas. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject RPUD consists of 235±acres,located on the east side of Collier Boulevard. approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard, in Section 11, Township 50 South.Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 1 of 9 June 10,2016 r- . u 771 , .4 1 BANTA:..NANBNIA Nl • BANTF BwFBAN� �. ' _.,..,_:. 1 —a ga 11 ,, ti T 901nEV4G+ 11 ' 7k t ito �1 n �LINTATAN T .. s ��iii rr it ft �, a _ g .X 0141 011 '111 il V ` i, > 4 - m o 1 ji fAR B.ABMr _ _ T arc l (��p se O 1 1-- l 401.7 WilLEV4Y1 M21 ��_ _ R �A�, Z 4hi " Q D d m 4 b -i rj 4 b 0 V O. kg 0 r--� u Z < ti D " r- 1 s _ ' �'Er:CSC � a b � /wC: v, +€ r I k , I Parcel B 1 1t ' :: _ ' f i M: el A -- ..., , '....„. , fil * t.,, . R7- k„, II ,. ' I i ,,,,, ,14 \ . . ,t, . Area Map(Source:Collier County GIS) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF MAP AND TEXT CHANGES: The application proposes to amend Ordinance 2000-10, as amended, San Marino Residential Planned Unit Development, by showing the location of the permanent access point, and changing the configuration of the lakes,roadways, and residential areas of Parcel B(as shown on the master plan). The proposed changes also includes modifying two (2) existing deviations (i.e., Deviation #2 and Deviation #4). Deviation #2, which essentially allows sidewalks on one (1) side of the street (in lieu of both sides of the street), proposes to clarify that this deviation would not be applicable to the RPUD's main entry road. The proposed change to Deviation 44 seeks to allow fences, as an allowable element within the composition of the wall and berm design proposed along Collier Boulevard as well as where the RPUD abuts the Willow Run RPUD. ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Planning: Staff does not support some of the changes proposed and does not encourage their approval: specifically, the wholesale loss of the well-planned internal street arrangement. Staff supports retaining the existing street design and discourages approval of this aspect of the redesign,but nonetheless, finds the subject petition consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) (see Attachment #1 - Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review). Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the CCME. The location and acreage of the proposed preserve will PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 3 of 9 June 10,2016 not be affected by the proposed amendment. A minimum of 57.71 acres of native vegetation are required to be retained for the PUD. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff reviewed the application and found this project consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. There is no increase in the number of residential dwelling units/traffic generation. The petition relocates the main access for the development. The access does not change the development GMP consistency;therefore there is no impact on the previous findings of approval. Additionally operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), and the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: This PUD was previously approved with eight(8) deviations pursuant to Ordinance 2015-30. Seven (7) of the eight (8) deviations are applicable to Parcel B only, and the petitioner is now seeking to modify two(2)of them. Deviation#2 (Sidewalks Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements) Deviation 2 from LDC Section 6. 06. 02.A.2 Sidewalks Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks which are internal to the development to be constructed on both sides of local streets, to allow a six (6)-foot wide sidewalk on one (1) side of the street only for streets with homes on one side of the street, - . -' .•- - • - • - . - ••- - - One(1)canopy tree (or canopy tree equivalent) shall be provided per thirty(30) linear feet of sidewalk. Canopy trees located within ten(10)feet of the sidewalk may count towards a sidewalk canopy tree. This deviation does not apply to the main entry road depicted on the PUD Master Plan for Parcel B. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner's justification for the change to this deviation is as follows: "The above modifications to Deviation #2 recognizes that the main entry road is being shifted south away from the northern property line via this PDI application.As such,there will be residential streets to the north and south of the main entry road, whereas the previous design only located residential streets to the south. Based upon the proposed location of the main entry roadway, it is appropriate to locate sidewalks on both sides of this roadway to facilitate pedestrian movement throughout the project. Therefore, the deviation language is modified to clarify that the deviation for sidewalks on one(1) side of roadways does not apply to the main entry road based on its new location." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The requested change would eliminate a component of a previously approved deviation and cause the design to be compliant with the minimum standards of the LDC. Based on the applicant's justification, staff recommends APPROVAL of this requested deviation. Deviation#4(Fences and Walls) Deviation(4)from LDC Section 5.03.02.C,Fences and Walls,which permits a maximum fence or wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum fence, PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 4 of 9 June 10,2016 wall or berm height of 8 feet throughout the development,and a 12-foot tall fence,wall,or berm height, along Collier Blvd., and along the southern boundary line where the RPUD abuts the Willow Run RPUD. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner's justification for the change to this deviation is as follows: "The requested modification to this deviation will allow for the option to provide a wall,fence,berm, or fence/wall/berm combination along the shared boundary lines with the neighboring PUD to the south,Willow Run.This is in addition to the approved fence/wall/berm heights along Collier Boulevard and around the project perimeter. The proposed 12-foot fence/wall/berm combination will mitigate potential visual and noise impacts from the neighboring residential tracts within Willow Run. The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening between the proposed residential uses, while ensuring a quality design aesthetic via screening of the wall by required perimeter plantings. Willow Run is permitted for multifamily buildings up to 75 feet in height, while San Marino is strictly limited to single-family dwelling types at a maximum height of 35 feet. Therefore, the additional wall/fence/berm height will enhance compatibility, and assist in screening differing residential uses, building heights, and associated densities across these projects." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The petitioner's rational in the initial request for the deviation was as follows: "The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening and mitigation of noise pollution resulting from traffic along CR 951, a 6-lane divided arterial roadway. Approval of this deviation will serve to promote public health, safety and welfare, as well as enhance the aesthetic appeal of the proposed community and the Collier Boulevard corridor." The staff analysis and recommendation of the previous report did not specifically evaluate or draw a comparison or distinction between a wall, fence, or berm. Since this was not a critical component of the initial evaluation, it is staff's opinion that including a fence or berm as a design element within the development, or a fence as a design element along Collier Boulevard and the southern boundary line would have no detrimental effect of the subject property or surrounding properties. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE CRITERIA: There are three (3) types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: Substantial, Insubstantial, and Minor. An insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or minor change. An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC Section 10.02.13 E.1. The criteria and response to each criterion are listed below as follows: Section 10.02.13.E.1 a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development(PUD)? No,there is no proposed change to the boundary of the RUD. PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 5 of 9 June 10,2016 b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? There would be no increase to the total number of units, intensity of land uses, or height of buildings within the development. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation,conservation,recreation,or open space areas within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously designated as such,or five(5)acres in area? The applicant responded to this criterion by stating,"No,the request will not result in a decrease of preserve,conservation,recreation,or open space areas." A note on the proposed master plan indicates that a minimum of 57.71 acres will be preserve area, which is consistent with the master plan approved in 2015 (pursuant to Ordinance 2015-30). With respect to open space, no data was provided on the master plan approved in connection with Ordinance 2015-30; however,the proposed master plan indicates that 60%open space would be provided,which is consistent with the existing language indicated in Section 2.8 of the PUD Document. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space),or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? The subject project is an RPUD, so there is no land area previously approved for or dedicated to commercial or industrial land use. The petition generally seeks to amend a traffic commitment, amend the deviation relating to the wall/berm within the development along Collier Boulevard and proposed along the shared border with Willow Run, and to reconfigure internal roadways and lake management areas on Parcel B on the master plan. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation;changes in traffic circulation;or impacts on other public facilities? The proposed amendment will not result in a land use that generates a higher number of vehicular trips than those provided for by the current PUD. There is no substantial impact to traffic circulation or other public facilities. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? The proposed amendment would not result in land use activities that generate higher levels of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, which were not anticipated when the principal uses were originally adopted. PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 6 of 9 June 10,2016 g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention,or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? The proposed change will not create a drainage problem as the applicant will be required to submit a SFWMD permit and all required stormwater documentation to County staff to be evaluated during the Development Review process. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? The proposed changes would not result in an incompatibility with adjacent land uses. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? Staff from Comprehensive Planning, Environmental Planning, and Transportation Planning have determined the petition would be consistent with the GMP. j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec. 380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)9e)2., F.S., and any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Sec. 2.7.3.5.4 or Sec. 2.7.3.5.6 of this Code. The San Marino RPUD is not a Development or Regional Impact and therefore, this criterion is not applicable. k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.? No modification to the PUD Master Plan or PUD Document or amendment to a PUD ordinance that is deemed substantial under Section 10.02.13 is proposed at this time. Approval by the Hearing Examiner shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application and action should be taken at a regularly scheduled meeting. Section 10.02.13.E.2 Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? No,the changes proposed do not change the original analysis,rezone findings,or PUD findings for the original application and staff report. PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 7 of 9 June 10,2016 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC)RECOMMENDATION: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and PUD document to address environmental concerns. This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): A NIM was conducted on May 18, 2016 at the South Collier Regional Library at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway. Ms. Crespo and the public were engaged in a discussion about lakes and their design,water management,and the buffer wall, which is the subject of Deviation#4. Ms. Crespo indicated that if a wall is part of the design, it would likely be comprised of masonry. Please see a copy of the summary of this meeting in Attachment#2—Application and Support Material. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on June 10,2016. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD. Attachments: 1) Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review 2) Application and Support Material PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 8 of 9 June 10,2016 PREPARED BY: (.- DK- L 1/4 ERIC L JOHNSON, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: j Ft.'-...4 cY ,f A. � a j J RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION PDI-PL20160000263 San Marino RPUD Page 9 of 9 May 20,2016 ATTACHMENT #1 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review eSy9o1rncy Ammo.. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Eric Johnson,AICP, Principal Planner,Zoning Services Section From: Corby Schmidt,AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: May 10,2016 Subject: Future Land Use Element(FLUE)Consistency Review of Proposed Amendments to the San Marino Residential Planned Unit Development(3'd memo) PETITION NUMBER: PL-20160000263—REV:3 PETITION NAME: San Marino of Naples Tract B REQUEST: The application proposes to amend Ordinance 15-30, San Marino Residential Planned Unit Development,with several Insubstantial Changes as listed below: • Amend Traffic Commitment 5.5.F. in Section V, Development Commitments to comply with a new driveway connection,as shown on a revised PUD Master Plan. • Add Traffic Commitment 5.5.G. in Section V,Development Commitments, regarding relocation of the Henderson Creek canal and multi-use pathway,as requested by County staff. • Amend Deviation No.4 in Section VI,Deviations to allow construction of a taller wall-berm combination along the shared property line with Willow Run,as shown on a revised PUD Master Plan. • Amend PUD Master Plan to reflect the insubstantial changes enumerated above, and, to show changes to lakes and roadways,as summarized (below): LOCATION: The subject property(San Marino Tract B) is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard (CR 84), 1.5 miles north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, north and east of the developed portion of San Marino,north and west of the Willow Run PUD and, south of Forest Glen Golf&Country Club PUD. Tract B is located in Section 11,Township 50 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The application for Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) is for the San Marino RPUD. The PDI requests are specific to a +196-acre parcel known as"San Marino Tract B"as addressed below: Development Commitments, subsection V.5.5.F: Modify language that involves a driveway connection; now identified by its geographic alignment with an existing CR 9S1 median opening, to be as depicted on the PUD Master Plan. Revising Traffic Commitment 5.5.F. relocates the "Main Entry Road" intersecting Collier Boulevard southward from the intersection location originally approved for this community. Relocating the "Main Entry Road"will allow for residences on both its sides,which the presently-approved alignment will not allow; and the San Marino PUD LDC Deviation (2) was originally approved based on this one-sided limitation. The new "Main Entry Road"alignment is not limited in this manner and will now permit construction of internal sidewalks on both sides. The original San Marino PUD LDC Deviation (2) is no longer requested and sidewalks will be constructed on both sides. Development Commitments, subsection V.5.5.G: Language requires the developer to relocate the pathway alongside the canal located along the front of the subject property upon its expansion,along with the appropriate [access&maintenance]easements. Deviation No.4:Allow construction of a taller wall-berm combination along a shared property line;now limited to a shorter height. Revising Deviation No.4 increases the height of the privacy structure separating this community from a neighboring community. Master Plan:Depict changes corresponding to the PUD materials above;introduce two lakes to the"front section" where previously absent, and more prominently, replace the internal system of connecting roadways with two multi-branched cul-de-sacs. Changing the PUD Master Plan introduces an entirely different internal street arrangement that no longer provides the traffic circulation and walkability provided in the design originally approved for this community. Staff has concerns that, while this part of the requested amendment does not move it out of the realm of an "insubstantial"change per the LDC,this change is a significant departure from the vehicular and pedestrian connectivity encouraged by the FLUE and from the original design approved. FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, surrounding land uses. Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services Section's staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. FLUE Objective 7 and relevant policies were evaluated for the original PUD rezone petition approved October 25, 2011. Given the nature of this petition,staff has determined a full re-analysis of these policies is not necessary. Based on the above analysis,staff does not support some of the changes proposed,as noted above,and does not encourage their approval; specifically, the wholesale loss of the well-planned internal street arrangement. Staff supports retaining the existing street design and discourages approval of this aspect of the redesign,but nonetheless,finds the subject petition consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi,AICP, Director,Zoning Division David Weeks,AICP, Growth Management Manager,Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows,Manager,Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section G:Comp\Consistency Reviews\2016 G:ICDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews120161PDI\PDI-PL2016-263 San Marino R3.docx • ATTACHMENT #2 Application and Support Material • t • SAN MARINO RPUD • INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 NIM SYNOPSIS • • EXHIBIT A SAN MARINO (PDI-PL2016-0263) • Neighborhood Information Meeting Project Information Sheet Wednesday, May 18, 2016 Project Size: 235+/-acres Future Land Use: Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict- (No change proposed) Current Zoning: Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) - (No change proposed) Approved Density/Uses: 350(existing) multi-family dwelling units within the Aventine at Naples Parcel "A"; and 300 single-family dwelling units on the 196+/- acre Parcel "B". *Proposed Insubstantial Changes to the PUD (PDI): • Amend Parcel B PUD Master Plan to relocate the driveway connection to Collier Blvd. and demonstrate reconfigured lake and residential development tracts internal to the • project. • Amend Development Commitments regarding the new driveway connection location shown on Parcel B PUD Master Plan, and the relocation of multi-use pathway along the Henderson Creek Canal. • Amend Deviation #2 to locate sidewalks on both sides of the main entry roadway • Amend Deviation #4 in Section VI, Deviations from the LDC, to allow for the option to construct a 12-foot tall wall/berm combination along the shared boundary with the Willow Run RPUD, as shown on the revised Parcel B PUD Master Plan. *PLEASE NOTE: THIS PD1 WILL ALLOW FOR STOCK DEVELOPMENT TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION OFA RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ON THE PROPERTY. THIS PDI WILL NOT ALLOW THE PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED WITH SPORTS FIELDS AS A PRINCIPAL USE OR SPRING TRAINING FACILITY. • WALDROP ENGINEERING CML BIDINEERIN6&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONsuur as • Memorandum To: Eric Johnson,AICP From: Alexis Crespo,AICP cc: Keith Gelder Date: May 18,2016 Subject: San Marino(PDI-PL20160000263) Neighborhood Information Meeting(NIM)Synopsis Waldrop Engineering, P.A., on behalf of Stock Development, and Collier County Staff conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting(NIM) on Wednesday, May 18, 2016. The meeting was held at 5:30 p.m.at the South Regional Library at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway. • The sign-in sheet is attached as Exhibit"A",and demonstrates approximately six(6)residents were in attendance,not including the consultant team and Staff.Handouts were distributed outlining the project overview and changes requested through the Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) are attached as Exhibit"B". Alexis Crespo (Agent) conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team, and an overview of the PDI application.Ms.Crespo outlined the project location and existing PUD approvals. Ms.Crespo explained the insubstantial change to a PUD(PDI)application under review by Staff.Ms. Crespo discussed the handout provided to attendees and presented the approved PUD Master Plan and proposed PUD master plan in detail,as well as an aerial of the site,noting the location of preserve area in proximity to the Forest Glen community. Ms. Crespo discussed the relocated access point, reconfiguration of internal lakes and residential areas,and the requested deviations relating to locating sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road,and an optional 12-foot wall/berm combination against Willow Run to the south. Ms.Crespo also outlined the public input opportunities throughout the process,and noted the upcoming Hearing Examiner is scheduled for Thursday June 9, 2016, at 9 A.M. Ms. Crespo clarified that this hearing will not go before the Collier County Board of County Commissioners because the proposed changes are deemed unsubstantial. It was also stated that residents who received a notice of the NIM would also be receiving notice for that hearing. • 1 Page 1 of 2 Following the Consultant's presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the Agent questions regarding the proposed development.The following is a summarized list of the questions asked and responses given. • Question/Comment 1: Will there be a left-out(regarding access point)? Response:There is not a left-out. Question/Comment 2:Were there lakes in the original plan and are there any in the new plan? Response:Yes,there are lakes in both plans. The old plan had a linear lake running north/south and 2 other lakes,and the new plan has a winding,connected lake system. Question/Comment 3:How does that affect water tables of communities north and south of the site? Response: It will not. They will have to get a permit from the South Florida Water Management District before they start building the lakes. Question/Comment 4:How deep will the lakes be? Response:I do not know,but we can find out that information for you. Question/Comment 5 and 6: Will they be elevating the land?By how much? Response: Yes,any property in Southwest Florida needs to have some dirt on it to elevate the land. It will abide by FEMA regulations as well as all federal, local,and state standards. Question/Comment 7: Is the wall a concrete wall on top of a berm that makes it 12 feet? Response: It would likely be on a berm and would be somewhat decorative and consistent with the communities on 951. Question/Comment 8:Did you say it would be a concrete wall?(Eric Johnson) • Response: We have not specified the material but it would likely be masonry. It is optional; it is not required by the code. There were no further questions or comments.Ms.Crespo thanked attendees for coming and noted that her contact information,as well as Mr.Johnson's,are available for those who wished to contact either of them. One resident requested that the images on the displays be emailed to him. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:50 p.m.The meeting was recorded per the CD attached as Exhibit"C". • Page 2 of 2 "f•..-• .S., `g": ''...w 5 — 4 --di • _. • N � �Vci • Y 2 � t ' 1.) --S. �` � = OO . � r 0 O a`, a , L11 UJ /, a a0i c LiJ 3 O xx O V do v0 '`IN JL5 O .0 a+ a 1J Cr) - a - WCA N 31 5 " a oo` c F- �, 1 '-� n v Z o E - 1 L. 7 C C > oo -• %9..44.. co a c v -s. Q- Q o Y Qoo = ~ _ � W O = � 2 * Eg " r 3 ,, V - � ' o N CC CL U ., d ' 9 I 411t 0 (c) z z g c t0 X za- o �1 cii. til� g ` a2 N "' � � $ I c d � a ,O /� l * su 4t a [/ OOW * O� 8 & CQ V Z — I* RI 4, a °13 ✓ s II p3. 1 j W � � Q.. � , o� Toy = _ _ _ _ `n" q 9 u O gtv V 0) U• L a > .O. = f0 O c a " 2 X W 7 > O y a N • i v Q Ni Z " v C'� �\�/1 c 73TV iSVC8 d '2•-- d t01-1 v • E _ � ` .', " 3 c O O N v 'C L c c ate, , e° t \ v \ .' I �` - - - 1 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE • I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment,or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavi Compliance ,,,,,, • (Signature of Applicant) State of Florida County of-€ ilio' 1-G' 01 The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 2 day of ,2016 by i /-e, ,S ere pQ ,who is personally know to me or who has produced as identification. Or.dee- 2.! --e'civ,6-4 ,* (S'gnature ofNoottaryPublic) �to ee /Vye3ebli/JJ4 (Notary Seal) _ Printed Name of Notary o��°:w„e� CANDACE WOODWOR'TH j, MY COMMISSION N FF 175934 * a(.1)- t •u,i EXPIRES:November 13,2018 '.^9jFGPFA eBonded TON Budget Notary Woes O. G:\N)M Procedures/Affidavit Of Compliance•NIM Oct20l0.Doc • WALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS April 26,2016 RE: San Marino-Insubstantial Change to Planned Unit Development PDI-PL2016-0000263 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Alexis Crespo,AICP of Waldrop Engineering,P.A. on behalf of Stock Development has filed an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI) application with Collier County in regards to the San Marino Residential Planned Unit Development. The subject property totals 235+/-acres and is located in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, east of Collier Blvd. (CR 951) and approximately 1.5 miles north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The property is immediately north of the Aventine at Naples apartment complex The application requests the following changes: To amend the Development Commitments regarding a) the Managing Entity;b)the relocation of the existing multi-use pathway along the Henderson Creek Canal;c)to comply with driveway connection location shown on the revised Parcel B PUD Master Plan; To amend the Deviations to allow for the option to construct a 12-foot tall wall/berm combination along the shared boundary with Willow Run; and to amend the Parcel B PUD Master Plan to reflect the reconfigured internal lakes and roadways. • THIS PDI WILL ALLOW FOR STOCK DEVELOPMENT TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ON THE PROPERTY. THIS PDI WILL NOT ALLOW THE PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED WITH SPORTS FIELDS AS A PRINCIPAL USE OR SPRING TRAINING FACILITY. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements pertaining to an Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday, May, 18th at 5:30 p.m. at the Collier County South Regional Library,Meeting Room B,8065 Lely Cultural Parkway,Naples,FL 34113. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 405-7777 ext. 207, or alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING,P.A. g 0.Oa Alexis V.Crespo,AICP Vice President of Planning 0 *The Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. 1 e; VssgsgInsgsssnAssAsrrsr4QAHMnAAAIAesgsnnngsssrA«snMnnnM4 'A2RRS2R354g22222Rgg2222gR2!?,aaRgag2ARR2R22R.122,7,22222.51.11gg2 III tnnn MnnnnnnMnn � �� MMMMMMMnnnnnMMnnMnnnnnnMMnn k- 351Am ssAss#sIIMsss ,Mi A4 AMsRssIAAAA assaRAARARRAiARAR ns p - Al s A ra m �i rym Q o ns 1q Ro. Tip i! 1.i ?,l�s j", r Els,. .a.i mti .a iA,:il it.a. < z1!i zi.. .a.=.a,5KL102A R � §� �_� m3amtm�.t�I i�an�Ylu�'an��Y.3gm,anxd iaefmf:WmZf��f�"I.I�'^�izY'�-< ,7�I�y'3.<°�',A7� LL i 1 i s I z!d$ _ .LL 5:i g g w d W :i yr l!z i x!S C F 3 l l`a:Y 3 1x <F °N5 ugLLiW zZ$Vsi �gh<Z�W .a NN =q� 3g /" oQ 99<ifi` g< Ig°��,Wr $ d ,6 x gy o W d e:m U" O s n . z a Sz.m v G S z 3 3R4 gj m s h„, ,, ;3 zl“i mort`d/ezG65V `zzlfWz .1fzmzQ`19u13$9i.86z830 3oi 321 z o a O z n z mi N ,i1 z . o. f ,2t a G z M o a x H Q3 2 n 6 t 1 1 s. 1 oQ i3 c G 2 s Q a 8 9 g 30m or 13 W 1 m i Q =° g t 3 "s g a t t R 3 > >0.3 ? 3 3 $ t i > § QGQz c G og a o, z qzggzG G g zu o m,o i°.10 'a 1 m � .6qtg� n aW;msg � O ; zz12d Avg aWOg "� Qgo3z lt Azo0311z1GOzlidNzE oil` RzOk iiih"s i b$flS,iml33gn z iggilETM IIA2 3 si02rnS��m f x W Wo u w f W z ass W f ir 4 7iooWS 3 3 m <iiu1t= t€Rlu zguE.i ° f s zE _ < o uWogn6,„ °.°zia „4airg8..tii..4Yw311,1;,-2 y611Uo20nW im g1 <Z<QOdJ°wO ? r4O 6 S6y11ZgW- la t ' % , c M< 8:i Wz°zz " zio14403i 665dilathii111mgamma m18gmmmmlm8�bd � gani888 WAs�:^�sai�e< asm�smMn s � e�s� s$ $ ss a ^�a��a�r� T I os s E i as h s sas sa74�ssss ssns a 74,1.ss F...m Mss sMsgss,sss sss sssss samm��mmssmmmmmmOmm.. ms ,.sm♦mO�mss��m�mO8^n�onm^m�^m ��no8o^mm^mm C M N M M a n M n n n n M M M M ry n a a M N Ig T n M eaV a IaV N n N E N N M raffia I n rai N s n M!n n n .a+N n n n n; RM q AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA IIIp 6 p e p p G p p p p p p p p e p p p p p p p p p p p p Q p p e p p p Q a O p p sry N N N%N N%N N of N N Ian N 2 N N N N N N N N N �R N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N%N N N N a N N N N N 2 N N«N N N N «N N N N N N N N N N ry N N N N«N N«N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ry N N N N N N N N N N N N N ry IICIRCiAWAAAMMViAMUMUMMiiiMAICARAARIMAfg Y mm 1 aq 4 � M i N� Ya ��dd"�CC p 4 1 SA A T`d( Ki jos N$ N o QQy88 i -i- a :171.T T T :i3341"n .O Q^ O - a:§ FF G LL 2.O.y+}+ 74 g p O >t i N C y Q 8 2 .6Sg3.yi=l Sung 6m=a 4X'Ag ao�rYi XiillgIX O iE LL 2 g O O Fri 3 O sC 55�� V' - a al . �No��,F�F"� y�9z�i�ri Nt�N'��Wh<J �� $Ja�l�y�� g"f�g�r�s�'"'��p� "'19 lAW d3%mgi.3311312 t i 53 i 2 �SiEli 3i z aiI t,>§SI 1 0 z I- c o 4 v : z a IIIa 5 0 g? o =3 v a >c c= o 3 �' m y .A d . UU N 1 g a 3 3 t s s �3a W 34 �C�s$� ��3� �i<Y $0 .yc]-G' W'RN>. e.gR o g zt.q 3 S" :~_'�j 9 i W 8 >< 2 i g_i 6 g 2 l§!<I c 9 zj $ s c 6 a S s3 ,, < �I ` 8 119 2$9 3 95�W< o 61hig g, JlloleAgallip g$N�j l'<3. xo 3 2 m g n "�x E i' C 4X�s g x r s„m,a?4 m! 43 g/2 g V 9 z 3=_�.m $m m2e a�Q gJ.f Sia .7z T3..R�'m ANmmm ^ $ $,N„ i z � 4 �a a y�r z v _ ' '�.i__� :,,Ogg-,1„ , W M�.711�� .p dnm°°c.e40a go '8N� z T ;i: .'1 .6W ai . il il g 18: 2gd n t1210g0=1.1.,82.1111 ti ljg d F i & f F- O u < 1 W :2 D 6 63Lta3w1LLe2-'ss-fftaRaal t538.21 _12f==3issss33. tYtoYY2 1 s i shills" siiissssgssIIsss"3 Neem it 8s"sisisslssssl Q Q n n g n n n n n p m m m m m m ^^ 8 6 m ^ n f°.4 4 r n n r7 n n n n n n n gn®n n�n n r��.n n��0r m� n^m m m^m�m^i � NNNNNNNNN«NRnnnRNNN«NNNNNNNNNry NNNNN«««N« ««N«««NryNN«NNXZ R "6. 6. a m N N N N n N A M ry N N n N N n N ry N g N N X r N N n N n 4 N NA N N mN ry bb H N N N N N n n ry n ry n n n n N x o a d S S S N 9 n S S N 2 2 2 2 51H n" M S 9i R S R R M N u4 R 9i N N 9i R N N R H S 2 M R N N N 5IR n S{M R R 2 R N41, N ry n N N N N n N N ry ry N ry ,,,�ry N N N N M N ry ry n N N N N ry �y nI m N ry ry N ry ry N N N ry ry ry N ry n N N ry ry ry 44444444M4444 444 s"AMERF$4414:4isrvsrv........ g48IAA444Nss"as"a4#aa: "!”n TA P gy m! 4 T , k 4i Eg "s 1 IA 4m g!� W4i . Jos :s74 Rid- ,I;gW - = gT TW. G 8& = TAl'axgga1MJmx"- x Xulx Y2! " bed o < 2d0'===d .dd t=s23 - dd = LLjLL 8 z ° Z _ 0@ a W €5 oa s411 g b Q 4 4 3 3 a m N >< g G o = 3 a G ° Ig '2 s z 3 ° g z i g d g3w t 3 8 F 3 ° - s f 985 8 x g 9 0 1 < rv� 2 x I ' 3 ^ " ! § m 2 8 s .' Millig G G N r 3 g °G i f m IEG z o °z < '°c% $4 ° �s i.r U �O�5 a6 �> G Z�p aC°w§W m°gs i �� 3> Q m<4 O z _ <�f ilrlin�':MUt} Sfa Wq is iiK> 6f$�g_^ !Nc�iffio�6 oz �z, ngg j j a 9 N�- 2 z z 5"1 i ° z°<O c 5 m i 4 w'�$I° $ il O <5 3 a f; i g o 1 8 g vi V3' a ^ z LiL <W : Hai a i0 gb zz Nd <.$Jut�_.n 3z12 < t., W f °tlG � ° 33�y�,�;; zW°o r3 xG� �y�z"i o �4.e 3 � z3s° w¢a 1 x°z <mz x c z 5;t7<5 m o W f m C C°'.z 1 <m P.m I t 1§3 r^ . 3 g m i G<s 3 x °z a< 3 w W. 6' 5 2 w °- °g z Y 5 a 12=i l_2 1c: 8` _d 5' j,-i w 1,i i W l" =z z= j z 1°LL<d 1 t A l°s • . _,_, n 5R_ 9mm f22fxffslmmtg22/$22$21 ">'`g2$o088 4 44'E z z z z z z 88^ 88o ^nN o $ 88 $88888888888 88888888888^88 "88874 Nnn! !ryNnn!!nnNn"nnnnNn!nnCNNSm�10!SN!!n!n$N!NnnmN N^ gay rvry ow 4111 2232223222"22gg9g22R2R2R22N222R2223325:MRN2Rg22512222R2g2g g2rvs"saanss"A'55s4$55Tg5$551Rggsry 5ALLSAoa5nRA1 rt nooo n g sm^5 R• 4525 2 2 O ry o b . N . m01~7 mN sS2 N Ihill,§1/1iry^ $T . i l7M R$$no. iq lil!§1112 ,Ip,- oi, I3Aug.A8ii:A44A,72 .,1A2-EigAAAR,,0§3 -ofiiiim2iol;ice :mgg i.5: .ig4ioegtgryai22, LLJ . -- i`LLm3aNozpaZgaWa „ Nc� ripgp gggra ¢u , � gNc90xulaa o E z 0 go i 0 I gi 3 3 3 ti Y 411 z z 1 4 M Z C 'i ; g i 0 s Z a n z aG a g W 3 i i $3 W o i 8 2 8 � z O 4 _ Z 3 a I $ art f QOS *.g m p a ' O �u Q Na - 80 n, V= y ;E! `q ih 2 i j m ti3^ o S; $g : S .rvo. a t 8 i t i c 3 a m 3 a z a 3 ''Y 1 s cG agog cv QT.GMS 6 Gig : 6 i 3 3.2.'° oz>a »V V45 ° <'1 e>4 .. a z AbQ . A G m o I W°m� fii?2= 35 1180fg 4(13620 o og� t4W; G8 8 i 041 s� ! go�og to q00 c � 23 4 .-.Sgt gogV ooi3 ��" �n 3mooi3dIaaPiW 3''o i 5E °I 9 o So3ZoV ��i $S o'Dah �=T a an >oN zW=o 1 E w m p,„ 12! i=rzO5 1 ai0 8Fezgtl k =S.3gW' Nd p V ta_! ;3z F` rc!0 a= -0t1 Z rz -§m�3 0, e c2ms3 / _ Icia" 5g, ` 152c 1mafidE = i =o9gWw35o . g§mo1'oog vFtzeoa =zg"- f ii"3" g-liogaoW W d7a2ZNE410 j •01 ,.m== g"dm,7 ,1zf. oisaWWo _,g FfgF2gito$$olELzz _5io. c � 3 glW - c m A3R$R&N � F9� C �� 333w3g33333 �'«^m tBeSn' m^e'�^R.Pr.^m.r ^o SmS $ m"�om^�S'nv�^•'« oo $ $ Y8 IMS .I5V,MIR Prna a i..lrvg . irgUi2ORM511B 888888g888mmmeegmma88888388188a8$888885ggm8gggs"888s,888m WA; ) $) AAAA 2 a;;■ NINNN i.41 !:,§ }kk� } 411 k ■ � d S 2 .t 7 |4�� }%§* § !§ §L§: ' IIS|V 160 e !§©! §!$a 1 • NapLr Ott *WS NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority,personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County,Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida,each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# WALDROP ENGINEERING,P.A. 1055799 NIM • Pub Dates April 25,2016 I < I a4=--1Q (Sign ure of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me 1 "Sr�;••., IVONNE GORI • This April 29, 16 I 1• 1 (.' p, My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 ,,rrte� I ""'lxii s' Bonded through NaUaul Notary Asn. (Signatur of affiant) ' 14A I Monday.ADM 25.2015 I noPLEs notav news Solar-plane pilots:Trip also test of human endurance i MAIL E.11edelleet.n xusem1 t JNTAM YEN,tett-The two Swiss pilots taking t' Q roma mflyasol caned , airplane around world tl aid Sunday the endeavor 3 Z Vy sass= 0 is not only a dcmonatra• -c. P a'^ `� os C tion of the importance of 1 }l- • wabkeoergeyyburalso T,. $; �` •� of the many changes the K't yr s " .4,.>p a) human body can endure f cR Pilot ed a r Bertrand Pkeard -- 'e t r ,t Sal+ C completed a risky,three- f. �- '.$.,..:c. day Bight scaoas a great . C eapann of the Pacific Solar Impulse 1 pilots Bertrand Plccard loft,and Andre W Ocean while dealing only Iterschbera celebrate alar Placard landed thele mlee-pro 20 'mea at a timeinside and plate Seterday et/dolled Raid in Mountain View,Calll _ a. — the plane's tiny cockpit .._ . Q with no her or air condi- flight from HawaU with- forced tostey inthelnlands R L Q tioniod and while having out fuel. .flettbplanebbatlaysy.- s,,,, i ;, q. t aC 'Cr to keep constacit contact The landing came hours tem wxainedhemdamage sr-r'nr #—f+.-n ^w'S'4; 3. a r 2 with the Europe-based after Pinard made a fly on its top from he pm The 3y r„r...�„ a vv��ax I, -d.._ rT t r A control canter. by over the Golden Gale team was delayed in AN.. >•.ds 14'--sat ,. 'h- �. "You have Interviews. Bridge as spectate.below too.When first attemppttiInng :n'a' `1... ,. „_ Z Q z navigation con test.corn- watchedtbe narrow aircraft to fly from Naming Cine. ern$ �- ° 4 muolc.tions with the with extra wide wings. ton...,theyhadto divert 'ea. M. `e'- s� '•, enrol center in Monaco. Pittard and Ba.chberg mlapabecause ofunfavor °B .. '.'T .- .7 sou You have health checks.a have been taking turns fly- able weather and a damaged 'T,.— Nlot of health cbeck.,'Pic- innate plane on an around- wing. - ''''--t-'7.._ ... ,. ,, ,r card aid."It's very active, the-world trip since taking Amonlh later,wkhhet- - „,.ye; ,+ a) there are a Int of things to oflfmnAbuDhabi,Mec • ter weather conditions,the s"'1°” et''-y `"^'A" ;s . C do,but you can reverthe- iW ofthe United Ards Emu- plana left Nagoya in n •:^"r,.y, , y!''� A : '}d k+''^ '`....-'''.`.4'. ' " o lass enjoy k.' ate.,in Mamh2015.1t made mal lapin forth wed - e s ..-'- a N Pittard said he uses stops inOman,Myanmar, The pl ' 'deal Bight 1"^„ - - d self-hypnosis to keep his Chma,lapan and HawaiLd a about 28 mvmphk,al eoergyupadpms heatin The trans-Pacific leg. t hthxcandaubledur- CS pad.inoide his shove and wee the rirkiels pan of iagthe daytronge w Hors.' CO C glonsas nfor complal.HeWd thof the lack of els mergesae rays are atroogan The - N a •0 be ready-made meals landing sites. emergency eurA000palmafwelgb , O T C CL the warm with asp.he la"Way have demonstrated much ucb.a.mid les,aboutrtach. - - .. ,.,, cent packet et..d t especial can 'VA h ihta to f y many nuc wings,which trtsr stretch � C O U heat decris tnd that ken haeme ni ht many Itsde than those oitBoe- . > O .0 N include risotto,abkkao days, no nights,that !og74,are equipped pfd Bich curry Sot ernes. tatechnologybei a pm works" is66747,am equipppeed with - < 0 On Sunday, trith saidiBore glare,dl,who at 00 propellers and c pow- - - - - ggwuenst��iaaey themofwith pBotadtbe plane onafivr lir propelkn and chapel � - � ��` ^�� Google,width a day trip from Japan to Ha- batten...Tha plane tuns Solar Impulse 2 Ma.Saturday over the Boldon Gate arkge In San Fraadsm.Tha sola,-powrad the Peeled,had a first loo wail end who kept himself on stored energy at night. airplane.Mich Is attempting to circameavigate the deb*to pramoa clean energy and the at the place inside a huge alert by doing yoga pose. Solar impulse 2 will sprit.'innovation,rrised hoes Mawail alter a three-day Journey across the PauhcOan bite tem et Moffett Air- and meditation. make three more stops hi field.The guests elm min- The project ha helped the United Stales before The project,estimated of life,for clean technoio- "Maybe it will beh. rlag Bled ad took photos web to show that"a.a human crossingtheAtlandcOcean to ave roomthaf100 mil- gies,tbr renewable energy. In 20 yeas when all the Pinard and fellow Swiss being you can he smith- to Europe a northern AM- Iion,begen in 2002 to high- This iswbete the pioneers airplanes will he electric C pilot Andre Brschberg. ciently mstaimble to be ca,acmnBPBmthe website light the importance of can really express them- and people will say'ObkY Prccard landed the So- able to fly at kat five days documenting the journey. renewable energy and the selves and be successful' routine:But now,today,an ler Impulsetin Mountain in such a plan:.' Borscbberg said the spirit of innovation. Sola-powered air travel airplane that la cantle110 • View,m the Silicon Valley The aircraft faced a few plane will again take flight "I think innovation and Is not rat commercially with electric engines,that CM south of San Francisco, bumps along the way this wok and the oeatsmp pioneering must cont.- practical,given the slow produces Its own energy OS Saturday nigh after a The SdalImmppuulIssee2 and- mild be Phoenix.But tbat ue;Pkcard said,"k must travel time,weather and with the sunk can neve X 62-hour, nonstop solo edinHawellin ulyaod way willdepend on weather. continue for better quality weight constraints. be haring,"Piccard mid. a� O PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE -"•`Z In Q U Q NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING o z t'rl z The poetic at Invited to attend a n.lgltbomaed information mating reed by Black march for ,, Development rad Waldrop Enosareng at the blowing time and location: -+'" • L Wadmtmday,May 18,2016 a 5:30 p.m. 2 we .0 Caller County South Region.'Larry Meat/rig Room°B' babries ,..,,r,:': Bass Lay Cultural Parkway,Neale&FL 34113 E The.object property totals 235./-ova and le located on the mast side d Comm P(y O Blvd.,epproan atey 1 It mice north of Rattlesnake Hemmodt Road n Section martfl �ofdimes' t, 0 Z D. II,Township SO Swath,Reno.28 East.Colter County.Florida The property la ., .�..o«sass- / E C T irnmedatay north d the Aventine at Naples apartment cornea..Tha property owner ,p R- -. O has Red an Insubstantial Change toe Pimm Wt development(PCO applatlon J I N O ` with Cob.County.Tha application Includes era Mowing deriga: �ti7 `. ' Z y "DS O To emend Oeveloan.nt Commemorate regarding', ON Menacing Entity;hi the -d'"v r -O N N O relocation d the existing rota-use pathway swop ea,Henderson Creek Cane ci to QC in 0 convey with driveway connection beaten shown on the revised Parcel B PUO Maty Plan.To amend the Owtatima to allow for the opdan b construct a 12-foot tal wall los berm combination along 6w shred boundary with Willow Rtac end to amend by „�•-: , "., Parcel B PUD Muter Plop to reflect the racanfpe.d internal akar end roadways. et s@ w& . TH18 Pa WILL ALLOW FOR STOCK DEVELOPMENT TO PROCEED WITH KAVA SURVIVED!. I 'y' - • CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ON THE PROPERTY.TH18 g,,,,a,,,v„p,,,,„yys„a POI WILL NOT ALLOW THE PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED WITH SPORTS .Hu..GPwwmo,,,, ,amwdn -J a march for W - FIELDSASAPRCIPALUSEORSPRINGTRAININGFACE2Ta `-MaWaeapwr. y;'•,y T 4401p_},p/y t h sass 1 "...,. Sgn upsaat marchforbabtes.org f w Q F:� Tt a mp(y5 .dgna urrve.R amen!. E T-yam Saturday,April 30,2016 ptri 41-` Sun N.Fun Lagoon V r15000 Livingston Road,Naples,FL 34109 4_10 r..tatj0 f Registration at 5:30 p.m.Walk starts at 6:30 p.m. a2�1 N Zli N WE VALUE YOUR INPUT 1 Sgnaturo Spomm GaldOponson Abdla Sponsor !! Business and property owners and residents re wekam6 to nerd the presentation NCH itaaa yl eltTB _ faa� and mecca the project win the awnr.'rpr.anmNa and Collier County staff.a Pub 1 i X Z A you re unable to attend the meeting,but have questions r comments,they an be sass. `'"" err Z CL dkml.d to, - • WaldropOemd Anne.R0.c/o Alexis spmbrgresco,.FL O•rr t r�'. Z`\ 29100 Barb Orna.Oc,Sup.305,Bonita spring..ft.34135 """ '�o".� tri ` (239)405-7777,al.207 OR daaloM eewaldrocasgnno.com T�_n�6',`tr ww.roCo la Me M:wWary does not von.arew wPa .. paw �� l3 taalafar1, Asa>.= Premature birth is the#1 killer of babies. . i PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 23,2016,in the Hearing Examiner's • Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, FL 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160000263—SD San Marino, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10, as amended, the San Marino Planned Unit Development, to add a traffic development commitment relating to temporary construction access for Parcel B, to amend a traffic development commitment to reflect the correct permanent access point location for Parcel B,to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B, to amend a deviation to allow for a 12-foot tall fence,wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south, and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the location of the temporary and permanent access points, and the reconfigured roadways, lakes and residential areas, for the property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida,consisting of 2351 acres. CLDo ,p' �-75/COLLIER v TOLL EAST ALLIGS R.84)OR LLEY BOULEVARD 4).44? COMMERCIAL PLAZA N.PLAZA WES TPORT CENTER R.Y. J�3 q• COMMERCE Op y' CENTER 37 2 1 6 p FOREST GLEN CEDAR U OF NAPLES HAMMOCK 3 _ PROJECT NAPLES HERITAGE LOCATION ---- GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB SAN • MARINO HACIENDA LAKES NAPLES NATIONAL / (DRI) 11 GOLF CLUB 12 7 10 WILLOW RUN HOMES OF ISLANDIA l LASIP CONSERVA-ION AREA NAPLES LAKES FST I (DRI) COUNTRY CLUB ASSEMBLY 15 MINISTRIES 14 HACIENDA LAKES 13 18 I All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252- • 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.1112182 June 3.2016 Co e-r Goxnty • June 1 2016 Dear Property Owner: This is to advise you that because you may have interest in the proceedings or you own property located within 500 feet of the following described property that a public hearing will be held by the Hearing Examiner (HEX) of Collier County. Florida.at 9:00 A.M.,on June 23,2016,in Room 609/610 at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160000263—SD San Marino. LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2000-10. as amended,the San Marino Planned Unit Development,to add a traffic development commitment relating to relocation of an existing multi-use pathway in Parcel B. to amend a traffic development commitment to reflect the correct access point location for Parcel B,to amend a deviation to require sidewalks on both sides of the main entry road of Parcel B,to amend a deviation to allow for a 12-foot tall fence, wall or berm along the shared boundary with Willow Run PUD to the south, and to amend the Master Plan for Parcel B to reflect the correct access point and reconfigured roadways.lakes and residential areas. for the property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard,approximately 1.5 miles south of Davis Boulevard,in Section 11.Township 50 South,Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida,consisting of 235±acres. You are invited to appear and be heard at the public hearing. You may also submit your comments in writing. NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE HEX. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEX AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, • WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE HEX SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO ME, A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE HEX WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Collier County HEX will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled, at no cost to you. to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East. Suite 101. Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380. at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. This petition and other pertinent information are kept on file and may be reviewed at the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division building located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, Florida 34104. Please contact me at(239)252- 2931 or ericjohnson@colliergov.net to set up an appointment if you wish to review the file. Sincerely. Eric L.Johnson,AICP.CFM. LEED Green Associate • Principal Planner p 11 a 4 0 0 ii(or7_ _..., • / ill „, li gJii ; ...a . ci.. tli ,,, iii . ?: , < 40.00.0"4\i ��PI zj ii mom-io-uar,r Z s I iM!j 14 ; 0 N itoi Esm 2 t-�, ___ Namminicami U (1S6'a'3) UavA31 8 a3nm iii 1 IW �'�� CO 4C 1 U �. f� Q•Ni i�..... � ... .��f.�' N 14. :. 21 d Ili6 i El E 1, , 1 ,��. f 1 I re , 1 . _ • 'Qi 1 El. 0 E i a Of a1 f— z F W a o s6 1I L E.J ___ Ill 1 5 id 1 _ ,__7,..... I a_1 2 g itA i 9 _ __E- 1 01 ,li ,f,t oarwxroa N2111(11,t116 If 3 1_ A G ' --J I,. 11 �. O 3 k 1� k ` WYJ x I go: ' i! P i 1 1 ii - - C.) CI t r• Or I I 44--”...'d --lh..•-. , 1 a i e41:111re .12 19 : „ 111 *.*•'11w in _ 'VIA3 �.� r _ sin won 6 �` a $ 9. p le i ..-! $ k ice.,«,. 1 _ 41. WORM 'CAW I r AIM F� ri v u S `,n\ > > > ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08006000000000 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m mmm mm m m m m m mm N N N Q 8 f f 2 5 f 2 � H h � w�-1 ❑ 0 0 O O 0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 N 2 W N z,Z W z z 2 zZ 2 2 2 ZZ Z 2 Z ZZ 2 2 2 2 2 ZZ Z Z 2 2 2 Z Z ZZ Z ZZ 2 Z Z Z Z ZZ Z Z 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 s 0 0 0 0 E O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d z ` \\a z 8 OU u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u z z z Z z 2 2 2 Z z Z 2 z N > - u374,."%z ° �.S, a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a f F f f f f f f f 3 w z z z z z W z z W z W z W z z z W z z z w z z z z z z z Z z z z z z W 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0p 2 V• 3 p a z ° Z . z " W W W W W W W W J J W W W J JY W j y s❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ .. o w 3 Z Z Z 2 z 2 Z Z Z Z �O 3 N � ,n�+ 0 p p O l7 t? U' l7 0 l7 u' V' U' U' l7 V l7 l7 U' U' l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 l7 t7 l7 l7 U' l9 l7 l7 l9 l7 U' l9 u' ° 606 ° 00 1 a „a, z _ a a g t W G G G G G W G G G G G w - G G w G w G W G G G G G G G G G W ,r„ u o o o o 4 o u u `.22“&“k' w w w < < < < < 4 < 4 < 44 < 4 3 y�1 a z 2 i Q 333 .=. 000000000000000002, 000000000000000000 a a m a a a m a a a m K a a m m a a a W W W z z W W z W W W W z H g J z $ z i 0 7, g w 0 0v � 0ou ° 0 (Do000000 • ,g,0 '� $ $>0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ x $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 0 0 3C8 Gt� G � � � GGG � t� � a = 2o �a c.. +ZZG G Gr rrrGr r r Nrrs za aaam ¢ aa z z nWnmG wG ww W W G ,nwo 000L00000000 0 Q ,0 a t° 0 2 1,6 o o $ e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 �3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 c 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �i W N \ �0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 O O O O O ❑ ❑O ❑ O ❑ 00 O ❑O ❑ O ° ❑ ❑O 5w33`�`zz z n 8p8 ° 8o08 ° 8 ° 88000000000000000008 0000 < 4aaaaaaaaaaa ,nzzzz8 � 3zz zzzz ;, -g m m ,O m N m g m m 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 3 3 8 3 3 3 $ 3 3 8 , 3 8 3 g 3 3 3 g 3 3 3 3 3 3 g 3 3 z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d d d 6 6 d d d E d d d 1 d d d E d d d 6 d d d d 2 Z Z 2 2 Z 2 a N N N N o o N ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 $ o $ 0 0 0 o zd a s zd a , zd zd zd a s 8 8 88 8 � 8ti8 S� �nxxxxxx � NNNNx, x, N � si„ � ,x,, xx,, x,, x „xx, ,x, z,, x, � ,xl „x „x ,x, rrrrrrrtrrrrr WO '1 '1 .~i .y N .~-1 .. N N V1 h V1 h a s a d� a 0[ a a a a a a a J .. e. �., N H .y H H N H N N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a O N N N 9 8pO `h' M0 - 7mm ',11 O V I N en N r� p N ^ I epi 4 A '74 HyI OO{ N t�J }�4�5 Y '+ }a4( ,+f T N N q h N �0 ID .A 8 N N N o Y ID q N N lND 8 N of ,,,,Q •N 8c-4'1' 0, 1' 88 8 Q N `l g N 7 L 8 i g 1 l Y 81 P' r1 � N YX m o m i&l 8 I " m $ §. ti N YY 4� M . 8 m� 'yi . , 1g ,a ❑ m A o N T� YYX 4 o .a ' i ` d 1 ch d, YS$ � 4 ,; g o b d a J 'J � J a mr . g 4 .t. 4 01 4.4. >4 4 � z o 4 LL g * 8 g ry 4 '^ -y -i .. 1 n 2 a .y .i ,- 'a -g F? m z 2 $ a. ulni N o N - AAAMAAAArAA o Xt A06 zm °rcdz•<!: i !lil. � 'z iAAA J � A2Liz `N° A .xzn � LLGWJZ _J WJ u� " ❑ JJJY " Ju- 0 ' JJJJJ J W-5,"--LLo W W St Wz W zW w W Ltatdt``L', / .. - 0 : s iZm,. mLL w LL g LL 7 W w g vi vi g g W w z0 -w 2 2 uh w H "� g vi= vi St g, w Z x WO o `n w w v1 ❑ l ❑ g ° w w 4d h W g m vi O p Q w 2'7 f g u� wuF W I.J ,J. IJ` J `�` Z J `�` � Jwaa din r a � aaJzi � a rj `�' dd � O � � 7a � ? rU' a` Z W d d d f a d 5 $ 0 $ 2 0 4 4 > $ 8 ° $ 3 $ * a a $ a $ ,U $ da a a a x a a 6 ° 2i z z z > m z z z z z z z z z 3 z z z 7m z z z z f z z z z z > z 8 „ W u z f z 2 z u• z u z ° z z u z 2 2 f 46Z f u. ° G z 3 u dd z i 3 4 ce a a z m o "2 a 0 z *, O • z w O 0 m m • Z d N :9:" N N ni 2 G 3 . 3 3 3 G ❑ G G G 0 o s o m ❑ 8 ❑ z °` z 8 o g 8 3 3 W 3 g 3 ' a $ 0 z a w o ° o = z T1 x lJ m 'a in 3p a 'm U .0.1 g m m m ad d °m o J F m - • N m a z f _ m a m h za .ai 3 n �. ^+ 7 a �+ m m n .+ N O ON O O m.0 OF - O O O N O N 0 0 0 O ~ r O t ti r # G ti '. 1_ F_ O F N N ,N-1 4444,N-1 .N-1 N z d z 2 zn < UD on 3 N Z 2 0 N Z N r Z ; 8 r r r > 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 0 °` 3 � 3 3 � 3 3 3 3 3 = 0 � _ > 1. A A H R H h A at R 02 a a m a ,n ¢ 2 7 0 7 a a a a a Dgal 3 u 2 w a 17, g a teuOFOFt� -uu `u * 2o GGr0bb ° yG zG but gG G $ GG ° ❑ > z $ O <Z s 2 a Z z 2 z z z aZ 2 j 2 300800 p p p0 pppp pppp i g Si ❑a W 20 8 ❑ 8 OOp > dQ Q❑ pO W p000 ° W Y >Q ¢❑ O . 0 6 g O 0 0 0 0 0 0 w w 0 8 H O 0 0 0 0 - O k Q 0 2 > g e O 8 0 0 t a i O 8 8 8 0 Q z a a m p .,.1) >)- 0z „a W z y� z W1 2 4 2 2 0 3 3i-3 g 3 g g a 3 a a a ! 3 2 3 3 3 5 . a❑ 3 g a g g f a 3 = J a g 7 7 Bw W o dodo ! $ oKdoo o °z_ $ a ° oc $ $ $ acazo 03 -uoo ,a acaa3 0zndR N oJ O Z O O ac O a 0 0 0 0 0 $ < 2 a 5, (N LL H N ¢ _N A x _H y r 0 ,=i1 a ,xi, 15 v_xi r a Z N N h i ,5, 6 a 1 f l m W a -i 0 m ' .. 8 a a a a 3 a 3 a a a a a s a 3 ads ° 2 m❑ m 7 m m m G Om a mp p [m 'Z0Z 4 m m a4 , W ° _ $ i of j E x0 NdaN ^ dOn � dnnnOn � ,ailmn� JO, mmm ( Zs < NOg $ � m tCD mm rla- Oil ° ¢ cnnxOo Q i m mq zm `% 1 '' ,s1i,1 `$N3 $ `sN $ `gig $ u .i .`".ImmW' ,°imrv ,,, 'On ❑ 0, tzP81f'm .IN � mp' 0m' c :: mom' sdtimamua. .. mm3 �x. m ,7im ^ggJarm0rvam1' a W a z F z a 2 i E ‹ G > W a'c a u wz g 3 awwJ o m ' IQ . u s g 7 2 G W a f J > 3 G o 0 j 4 3---1g6 a G '- Z x < s r s f w ,T, d w ! z W i s arc o ea V, o ° d x Z 0a 0 2 g,Jzd � Z � 2 f . f „�, Grzda❑ �a- . if W WZ3 U 0a wZ Wy of 0oF3 mF r m � 7. mu' u2 m W WZ4W a30 i0 m .. F w - l7rx ;; 0000 3as YSW WWW „ wgoz „ ... w wa ,, a ¢ z0 3z00amz zonZiz ° ° ° ° ° ❑ ° ? ao ,`aoa < . on5L Baa. 21 ,, Jf ?e3ia2A ° $ 6 .,wa -, ,,132QaaSE5 ❑ 5 8a00Wao3i4z >- 3aaaifLf = § 2goaaa , m ' WLaapd0 a4I8 -og ., aw � FpRgiRorpaoWW 1 .4dd -S6WdWoWoxWog > 8i7Jm 0 dgddd � ° 2a • fIn ¢ 0, 000 ❑n ❑ g9 5 a 5lwS 7 ,nx 47 4oiga =if7g3gm3 ' Owa. ; 1fmxenW5 26 I8SSQ88pNlipB8ppBNONOA � � N RoO r0 �- § ANggsg — ,,„ ,-.4N $ .1- . e. gy- 8, 1 .. . 74 ;1 .N ~ . .. " - . 8 : 4 M '4 " " 88888888888888 avavcvaoc 'a 8A8888888888888888888888N8888888 '00^ 0000 0. aweXNxn ' r ' ' ' NNaryNoN < aeaavzzraaaNaNvNvXXXXXrQxxAxgz7N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m g m m m m m m m m m m m m o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m • 7 7> 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 > 7 7 7 7 7 7 > > z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 3u2J 3ZIJ 3� 8 a• �s� mW aW p2 0, grsW g�6 ,3a g33 0YAr�g6ra 8Wz,iaW gaW gWsH¢ HaY21JY1 a 6a Ma a ag5faY2YJ 11 ciaW faw2wJ a 0a aYW01 aYZWJ1 aW, Ha2 a Frn, ▪ O O ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ Z2ZZZZ22Z22Z20ZZzZ00002202ZzOz zZzzZ8zZZzzzzzzzzzzzzZZzzZZzzzzzzzoOOooOo000OOZ Z0Z0000Z00Z20000 . oU8ouoaOO88OOOOOOOaOOaOOsO880uUUUUUUUUU vuVuVuuUUuuuUUuUUuuuvVuUv aaaaaaaas ¢ aaaaaa aaaaabaaaaaWaaa aawba aW a WWWw b WZb Z WZWZWbWWWb bb WWbZbbbbbb Wb bJW U 777UUUU77UU77 ) 7U77OV77VUl7U7077L4777l7777U7777U7777O7777Ol777O777 0 G � ;� G - 1,7 r2t;; ILnGWI Wwn nt2Ntnn awwmwwSww mmmmz ¢ ¢ O000 rcsaww ¢ s00ss00 isszKsasaOas0so0 00OO O " W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ o 0 0 0 0 $ o 0 0 6 6 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 o 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 $ $ 0 0 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Z z 2 z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z Z Z z z z z Z z z z z z z Z Z Z z Z z Z z z Z Z z z Z z 2 z Z 2 2 Z z Z Z Z z 2 z Z 2 z 2 Z Z z ¢ a zd zd zz a za a s z a a szd a a z z z z zd zd a s zd a zd zd zd a zd zd a s zd a s ZZ a s zz zz a s ZZ a s zz zd zd zd zd zd zd zd a zd zd a zd zz a zd zd zd zd zd zd a a ✓ t r H t r r t e r t e t tt r t r r t �C- r t tt r t r_aCe t t pr[ r � r r t r r r t ,¢ r-C t r r• n t r r t F- rr ty r . . . . .C t r - ' ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggmggggggggggmggaa] ggggggmgg % gggggga'agggggm 8 4 1 m 8 A2 Q 7 I h N Q N 0 • H QQ " ii ! I aIm Nti 0 . , 4 - ow.-„ , z.. .. ., - N Z LL , Z3 LLQ NJ tieJz a4 t mr6ax3 3 : n oae mw � aae 3 = O A alpy LL 2 4 $x $ s„, < n Z a i pNU� " ,g i , .ddz n y g2 igi zo gc ZZ ~ a WZ = a ,wi . ❑ 00 , ozmi- z2JOmJN2 2 . tyyi e " o ? LLLL ° ( LL " q = Ja8 1. 43wgZdKe° axezo4Zai " ZoZf o=vx4OExgOJ zgnf dg c iWa ` d 3 tdY guo r i ,- 0 -' .. . 32 ° VI N3mbfi 3nma zm" gazz3g3fz nozIg zw 38b of xJo m 0cc 0 3 z m N 0 0 m r b N z O 0 Z OT % p F 1� . 7 7 70 Ce ro Ko x z Q Lr- o m a m m V J O b Z m w L', J 3 ,,..)'-i J ! Y YO = J b o O s A m ; a m m > LL yY HUH 2 O0 ary mm V2 m J r .n g o 7 n m 0 3 2. 0 5F,. . 9x t 8 ~ p t2- z < Z Q r p t t 2. o N ry w N J z Z O 2 ¢ 2 ❑ Z Z ma > > m 7 a 9i 7 7 0D < O p ft 0 y w > 0 00 w 0 '>'- ' 0 0 a a 0 2 a 0 o a z > p Q z0 5 ';'- 3 vwri T > YQ a > Y >Q p� �J t J Y QY QY ❑ ❑ a Q ❑ 2 1 Qr W YQ 4Z . 2 Q❑ Qy m y W , a Z m m n ¢ W p¢ m U a W , § m > r m g 2 Vf a z f O m > ae m m 0 Oe w l❑7 m 0 O y 21E 0 'x- tD1 g, � t. wt a❑c w8p22 :;= 1a ❑�ne (z-7wawgs 02- LIozwta �° 4 � m ¢ pJ7 < ; 11° E5 w " w m m o J o m g -s o 0 a a j m m f o a o o m T 3 0 0 w p a a o , a g o , N s o x �c b L m 0 A v z is x 6 o m w O w 8 x g m Z 8 � m m n g 1 U d m Z s m x < a “ m 2 z z m M p m Z z O 0 �i r ¢ O u O x w ❑ O 0 0 l7 r 'U 7 0 0 O O X p ac x 4 O O LL O 7�. w U g 2 ayc w - 2 m R- a .n dug 7QQSog z $ fpp3x � � xyioZ � m � rgmzmoZ � '= o � � 5a � ya�p � $ 7Umr-' $ z 'so xw zj �n �QO n p m r N a� rn � n � T " H T � tai o r a N �' W m ❑ � m q x d iJ� m V ae Q. h � G 2 N in x [[ 7N m ry ti ry w g+ i s m m 2 v m g in a m .Ni m n f .1Or xry °m' m O 01 0 uS �i a iJ LTJ 1-n .N. ; 1 8 1 O •z•� ; n n m m a i .+ m m a m ry m ax z G 4 a a g Y r a z z p Z z z > z G > " b Q > r Z W z G ,m„ °y G w p zd a s o ❑ � Y z z ❑ °d hfl 0-'5 � g � i g l :sa a za . r = aaz0'i oll x � p .1 . 1 " pQw2rf Z ^ne3n °a F wloga❑c ❑ � ❑ � = t5 WZ. ,, ,� ,� ,� 7ay � oxm � za< W w � �aan � a W " � s0 o< O � , Zo � Wan ❑ " w � - a al ,T a l i z °b d n Y K m Z l7 g " ¢ a x E '' `u�� ❑ 8 g ,a`I g o N O 2 2' E Z x a x R wb j ❑ O x6 = g o $z 0 W z o 7 z w G z ac i a z1 --n g o m ❑ a = ❑ a f z O z o taco g x m a o E i n 3 r � y ee w a_ ac a x � m _ x n ❑ � x 0 i p � � f ❑ �+ f 0 u� 2 x 0pe qqa %z i Q p K 0 x m ❑ O a 0 a w 3 z O O u ❑ 7 w V 3 U ac ui w Z w ZZ l9 i 7 l� rii O O a � � a w � V w Z O O V '� 2 2 O V 3 ❑ � '�' � O l7 x z < � � ¢ O Z U'• 1 � � � Z s x O O m U 5 p e 0 0 z i= i O w b g o a ? a z¢ 2 W ~ • ¢ -w 7 , and q2 2 W WC c b W u W c 2e w z u o a Z yi = Gi 2 5 Z 5 Z O z b O p Y " f V Z K¢ w " 0 ?� 'U l7 vi 3 2 Z x 7 0 0 x lu m oe G N 2 I Q u a j a O w z �2 7 x w :" < W t' O¢ W O ¢ Z w K O i b u 1 _ a< o ❑ 'U O m a. f Ost3 ml� sxic m 3sz t� � s� iadff v3sgot� xm " z � nl¢7 qi ❑ az ❑ OY � 3 ° E � ssxu m 8 nm 8W 88r8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 r nn r Wn rnnnn n NaeaavneonaN XXN XnaHavavN aHeARWN: AnNlAA• avnnanannaaerya vaN aanXAP: rirvann an 1 m CO CO m m CO m CO m m m m m m m tom = m m m m Mal m m m m m moa m m m m m m m as m m m m m m m m m m m m m Mtn Om m m m m m m m m m m f f f f fW f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f >fof f Zf f f f>a> > f f g > f> f f f f f> Zf > f f Z > > > > > > > > f > > > > Z > > ZZZf > ZZfZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZfZzfffZfffg O00000000gMgfgggggoo $ oggggggEggOgdAgg $ go ❑ gogpgoggO ❑ oggg O 0z0zO0o0ZZoo00000000000000000000oUOOZoOo0000o00o0ooo00000o00000 0uVUuou 0 oaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaQaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaWzaWwwWWa ZZWZZzZWZZZWZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZWwZWWZ dW OWOzzW5ViSA � O � � I � iiO � OiMIMIdid � ddOioiaTh � W-OOt� N i4miN� N Nw GW ,- NNNwwNWNNN � G,, WN¢wN . � ,- N ,, w Gw wW ,, WWNWW , WWWWN ,,WW O m wor00 z ¢ ' z ' aa ' 0 6G 660 0 ¢ zOnm O z006 O 00 000 000000000000000000 u_ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > o > o > o > o > o 0 0 0 > 0 > 0 >> 0 > >> 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > o >o >> > o > o > o >o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g a g g a a a a a a a a a a a a g a a a a a g a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 4 a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z Z Z Z z z Z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z zz a zz a s zz zd zz a zz zz a dz a z a a a a z z a ¢ a c z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z dz zd zd zd a zd a a zd zd zd a zd a zd a a a zQ zd zd' zd zd zd a � a zd a a a a zd a zd a `- r r r r r r r r r r r r r r t r r r r r r r r r r r r t r r r r r r r r r � r r r t r r r r r t r r r r r r r r r r r r r 1 m m m m m m m m m ii m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m l m m m m m m m m m m m m m % m m m m % m % m m m m m m m m m m m m m % m 81; OM I . 5� N . b AP am max?ma� 52 m Ngo me g p ^ 110 "t . 0, .4.48 ,- 3 . ^N4 I n * N 't^ s 'A R4 7.q2 TN 7. n M .1Oi 4 `8 ai b j e .. .r . 0, Nn43 m$ - '09 " $ 4' i n j5 - R T $NM' o- Q q 5 `R .. 0, E s o S ` j na ; $ ii 0, Z $ i. `j� Z 3 'r� . a rA N . R g a z v .o .414 -' a m i .Ni a .i . EE .t a .ii N o a a . .y 1n m .ai z - am . . - 2O 3N o ��p5 .' 0u 4m " 0 ,5, 2 .r z " ,15 , ' 000 .a. 3NYf .nn ? m .y ''am - o 7 " r2 .. -' -' ..., . sol,,of Z .i .o e" o g A M x 0 W OC ! T Y g m 2 > 0, 8 BVI Z a? H a X A m a Z A A a c" >- -, ' 55z,J >- -, 3 z =a m o z 3 a O o $ z z 3 a 3 z o z 0 2 , Y z u . 2 J m g J 3 Q .c Q z f x f J a o 8 z z N p 5 f g f > z O ❑ g h J O a a ". Z O D O Z z 1 f � Q � ma� ack � a _, L.E' d` W67-q $ ? O ?�>�5 zc . aaySt oxuzz3az °` Alzori't. % 0 '85 zJ Saa zz agz .37, x Cfzzf f iamtgz ❑ 5f lloh 'IdOt3' tAy, f wSFz16 § g Lit6Piwizx2wm6 `r`� 6t6A5 _, 5 ; 2062 < Y = Y g ON R a 0 Nur O Z 5 g m W W z p O Q 3 0 0 0 0 . Q f o r N 1 1 i o 0 z W I 6a 0 N U f n iT a< o IIIm � mas m ai z t g r 5 i z t l w a m Qz z 0 f p N p N a n' Z ¢ N y Z a IE T O vri 3 . p4 "J '' i w z aaa 6 g W ae „N, S{ 0,O o ti w K Z r 2, 0 zp i U p 'g. O O '15. 6 N n Z t O O z f O Gi z z tS n T m a p _ 0 u icw T § 2 p .=, tj 3 p n a z 0 O N a >< `2 0 > o m b w O p > x � ° Ug7e 0, s f 5n $ u N N o AA „� 0 f5' F sig 4 ‹ N q ? N .D gg g n M t 3 B t t t D o = - z m a $ 'r^ 7 vrvi N > > ae o zz ac zz w m ❑ o r az o 5 rcto3zo W � Pyo bo 0 > O ❑ I 2 > m N 3 o V N § r > ❑ ❑ > T > O TQ p ' w 1 < 6 ,74- G z N a vd V C R Z R W O y > ❑ O 0, j f °` 5 a 2 u 0 'r^ a as D O 0 °Oa a4 o f F E o 5 o p a 6 3 o W E s t o z a . Z G z °a >' o o °� t ° w t o i p w p J t o T °d o xz 0 ❑ tyx N ax a � > `J` a „r, zQai rp _ � - x = ❑ c U ZZ O Q a N as W 5 ro a m w k I m p N � H �- s � S W m ❑ 3 0< � S Q x m .ZJ a > 'a z Z w � LL > w s `� OJ z_ Ox > � O ti °L O LL O u, w � � o< fw . 9, ug "; e C, 147 z ram m Yo Smz f 0, . k z o 9 ❑ w 3 o 0, � _ � 2 as � a f > o N o 3 4 0, "� p a p r 2 W w p W l7 N f 0 7 ? w w u3i Lt > O z t7 O W m 0 f OJ g 6 Z 0 4 0 < O ac a I .n S orcsS �' ux nwm ,p z o wOr z33 f '� Fmmo3 � ON =' vi ¢ oaa0a, o4 � � � a � q z p 2 r N Y . O � � m ry a m as U O n vi n ry p n a[ l7 aC > I R3MEstewi §71 � Nfp. n < amti am+ a .m-i `�k7MAFA �� ig � URU F, V .o. oi .N. "nm $rv � 4 c , rv °a I 7. ¢ a w m 7 z 1 I 4 iz a ' awZ zaWp az $ 1 z � ea. a �m❑ p Ee a Z p' zdW I ❑ � dgzzo . oJcIa > ,7,, ;=. z5 ! i , g ' a t aom ' Z aao � d ❑ WW aZZa 0a ❑ E y0 � 13 Ua f ' aapaza ¢ ,9 _ ' q ° ' OW � .6 = V1 ac = mV) 6wz up .aO I m , 0ZzQW � fL . gyN WZOa = zw $ 6 aaa ,9G01002Oa Q UKF ❑ _. 0Z zN0Dr8 � aZaVpw mWz ,T2 I z4opOlfag ; 64o0, o1F = � o - o $ OS5 � ¢“ 2 = ogo3ti8LdwWxrpoFW72gg 0 ❑ afOz t aotZOzpu ,ugf mNd z 40 iZz26iOHgf UiZc � xNza �Si � 3 �� gwz5OwNsNWa5 i > f „ Yzoao $ 4 o gWoW d aW � . s8 � . .ad WP w ' ya , kN . o3o58, � o, , xomx ❑ J ,, Of , mzma u . fox, pN 0, R ry4NgoN NNyM R NNNIN ^ NmmpNopNsiAl I § §§ § ss8sagsssasssNsNssNNssssass § NssssNs § sass § sssa § amn n n n nn an n nnn n nnnnn nn I a N a N a a N a a N a N a a N a a N v a N N a a N a a a ry a a a a a a a a a a e a a a o a a a a a a a a a a a ry a a ry a a a a N ry ry N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I I I 1 W Z O O x x P. d m � V Y > K d' H I- • 2 2 03 U V os d1 • 0 0 W W Q• Q 1- H EE GL W W x x N yyNyy J .J d d Q Q 2 2 m m 0 0 f� h N N yM el J V1 W• NW J a Q Z • 3 3 m m 7 J d w w r H z s w w 2 x m m O U Z_ g- ee CO J J ✓ ci K CC Z ~ J J 88 00 IC I• Ili i z = • SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) • PDI-PL20160000263 SIGN POST AFFIDAVIT • • w I •. (CHAPTER 8,COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s)must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen(15)calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s)must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code,Chapter 8 E. L The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s)must be securely affixed by nails,staples,or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post,or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s)in place,and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable,the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 410 BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY,PERSONALLY APPEARED Alexis Crespo WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COL "' OUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PL 11600?�263 : Err / I; ma 28100 Bonita Grande Dr.#305 SI a 'MF ' [CANTOR AGENT STREET OR P.O.BOX Alexis Crespo Bonita Springs, FL 34135 NAME(TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY,STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER YGI The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this day of J U no , 20jj by 31tX� at/Apo , personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. •;n JACLYN MICHELLE MITCHELL 17.1a, .% MY COMMISSION SFF988491 S gnature o otary Public tva e. am- :pz EXPIRES:May 3,2020 �: • 9 SAN MARINO PDI PL20160000263 REVISED HEX SIGN POST PHOTOS . • t ,r-,0x4-4+3Cuit'{--1' :A'f - Yr " +M `k.^^ `lM.Aj.€Y t Wz DY XR4...2..-4.L.,...,,,,...„,„'4N e. . L1 'HEARING , Aid INSUBSTANTIA4,CH4 • TQ x { DRNT�AL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(RPUDr p• QN#4 P 1 P�.2�11 11000263 SAN MARINO APUD'TO BE ` -..,_e �c fi HEARD• dY 7NE-COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER(HEX) sI iAN.0,,T uc All I TA!UALnWwWS SlMaAICE NIC A= .,tiEWNoAuri ; WEr UP*IT:. AN a ►A F# OIIAi1101',TB tE00�0111u1 Ca slu$T1011 ALCt/0 NI lipt "Y! �A•TR,A scnie.wl ,ERI 1!w ucT ma c.ucc't m u ac ACCU1(10IuCInsa Nt000Cµ,0. AIElflr A YITAIA i011511E EOE11113 igEE 06 tit,OLU/11101 5055 rAttik Ifs„ A/Etf10TIN 01 At 000 A .TALL EE13.wail fi E1AIE;AI o «U.i1.Et011 Il, 111E EErpb M.`15 1111151151 twat MI 1151511111 CT 7$Ua`AUIOM as 1 TTIPOI 4'I; 15(155.501155 q�M1iMN>�t WtE01110 1(AIOoi � r Pol) �N It 0/ EF CEtytf1: t .0,7,—, 1Q qp 7,V011lio0Tr ,y'"-_v sK' 7: Fhy x «a7. �r .��y4.}ryy A r'M'T•i t �`. 17' .. ,� i' f $gWntt.;..� t.: ws4'Y' {, ' -) s. ` (� �F,_ #r E r xF, a# fn ‘....,..,,..,,,,01, f� `''s>� ._....,,„...,4‘1,11,-,#* '^ ERGOu�1AIF1 fi. 7. • rd« , 1 F 2 �'� `• I O: .6.„,),.1„, SUB1 AHT tf 7.,7,4,.,°. 0� SPD - L20)6':.„,....,,,,,„9.,,,...._,,,..D,„,,,,__,..,..„. ..,..„..,„:, 083SAN 1 .« ; � !' '. 1;:447,:7,i0.7, E� ,,#1110bE!`1 11° 4 0 , II* • liy q• . y ,i,!-'s + 'i1i>N ? OIT_is l�iopo vo 0. '4115 . .. . L: € •••. p �A1 11 7'il•simet/i'WmRriElti1g1uakt(mpotolt .^• tt�t`.11#45 +CC fa ,6{` q•" 3 ;r x . n 4•• , . . 1R' > a Fps + wt + Nab 3 f..'.. . },,w.r " +� ,64117,1 '4• •:' xa^w `7.xz lam':. a ro. SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 • COVER LETTER WALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS ' fkt February 4,2016 REVISED June 9,2016 Mr. Eric Johnson,AICP Zoning&Land Development Review Department Community Development&Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: San Marino RPUD Insubstantial Change(PDI-P12016-263) Dear Mr.Johnson: Enclosed for your review is an application for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD in regards to the San Marino RPUD, a 235+/- acre project located east of CR 951/Collier Boulevard and 1.5 miles north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. The PDI request is specific to the 111 196+/-acre portion of the PUD, known as Parcel B. BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS The Property was originally rezoned in 2000 from Rural Agriculture("A")and Rural Agriculture with Special Treatment Overlay("A-ST") to PUD, allowing for the development of the property with a maximum of 352 dwelling units,a golf course,and preserves. In 2002, approximately 39 acres of the PUD were developed with 350 multi-family dwelling units known as the "Aventine at Naples" apartment complex, effectively utilizing all of the available base density for the entire PUD. The intent at that time for the remaining 196 acres was for development as a private golf course and club. In February 2014, Stock Development & H & LD Venture, LLC filed a Growth Management Plan Amendment to allow: 1) density bonus of up to 2.5 units per gross acre via the transfer of up to 2.5 units (transferable development rights) per acre from lands designated as Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands; and 2) to allow the use of TDRS from any lands designated as Sending within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, thereby omitting the requirement to obtain TDRs from lands within one (1) mile of the Urban Boundary. In 2015, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2015-30, the Applicant amended the RPUD zoning to allow for the development of the 196+/-acres with a maximum of 300 residential dwellingunits,, preserve lands, and San Marino RPUD—PDI Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 1 of 6 amenities in accordance with the Growth Management Plan application. Since the date of approval the • property was sold from H &LD Venture, LLC to Stock Development(SD San Marino, LLC). REQUEST The Applicant is requesting Staff's approval of an insubstantial change to the San Marino RPUD to allow for the following modifications to the RPUD,Ordinance 2015-30: • Amend PUD Monitoring Commitment 5.3 in Section V, Development Commitments, regarding the Managing Entity and date of amendment approval; • Amend Traffic Commitments in Section V, Development Commitments, regarding the realigned access point as shown on the revised Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan; • Amend Deviation #4 in Section VI, Deviations from the LDC, to allow for the option to construct a 12-foot tall wall/berm combination along the shared boundary with Willow Run as shown on the revised Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan; • Amend Deviation#2 to locate sidewalks on both sides of the main entry roadway;and • Amend Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan to reflect the changes requested through this PDI application,and demonstrate the reconfigured lake and roadway configurations. The modified commitments and deviation will allow for the protection of public health, safety and welfare while supporting the Applicant's intent to develop a single-family residential community in accordance with the PPL construction plans(P12015-1759). 410 As discussed during the meeting with Staff on January 4th, existing Transportation Commitment 5.5.F. erroneously describes the access to Parcel B from Collier Boulevard. The distance provided for in the commitment does not align with any median opening, either existing or proposed, and furthermore does not align with the Applicant's proposed access point shown on the aforementioned PPL plans. The revised commitment will allow access to the property in a location that is acceptable to the Applicant and Collier County Transportation Staff. As outlined in the enclosed deviation narrative,the shared combination berm/wall/fence along the southern property line abutting the Willow Run PUD will further enhance the compatibility between the two neighboring PUDs, and will assist in screening adjacent developments, as intended by the LDC. The San Marino PUD contains an approved deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, to allow a maximum wall height of eight (8) feet throughout the development, and a 12-foot tall wall, berm or combination fence/wall/berm along Collier Boulevard. Approval of the modified deviation will allow the Applicant the option to construct a 12-foot tall fence, wall, berm, or fence/wall/berm combination along the shared property line with the Willow Run PUD depending upon the uses that are developed in the tracts adjacent to San Marino. San Marino is limited to single-family dwelling types at a maximum height of 35 feet, while Willow Run is permitted multi-family buildings up to 75 feet in height. Due to the differing scale of dwelling types within each community, the proposed deviation will enhance the project from a compatibility standpoint. Please also refer to the enclosed Deviation Narrative that further details the appropriateness of the requested deviation. • San Marino—POI Cover Letter Page 2 of 6 JUSTIFICATION/COMPLIANCE WITH LDC§10.02.13.E: The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E as follows: a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No, the request will not impact the existing PUD boundary. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; No, the request will not increase the approved density or intensity, or the height of proposed buildings. c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such,or 5 acres in area; No, the request will not result in a decrease of preserve, conservation, recreation, or • open space areas. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No, the requests do not impact non-residential use areas. The San Marino PUD includes only residential uses. e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; No, the request will result in a decrease to the external impacts of the development. The Applicant is maintaining one(1)point of ingress/egress from Collier Boulevard, as currently approved in the PUD. The Applicant is simply modifying the description of the access point's location in the Developer Commitments section to support the proposed ingress/egress shown on PPL construction plans, and approved by Collier County Transportation Planning Staff. Therefore, the relocation of the access point will not have any external impacts. S San Marino—PDI Cover Letter Page 3 of 6 • • L. w = 0 L c 73 Q o v ."r a >. 3 a ,> o, o ;; 3 a, v 4 E vs ° OJ CU v O c _ v }• a 3 0 4- a v v • 4. C C L. m = o H` v C 1- a +�+ a y a, i z a s E Z 0 a' 3 u _a o a, O ) n a; 3 0 0 a a 4=► v O CO y E v •o a'cu 4. v a, y s a a co y m v 3 f° c u ... .p v .c C a . _0,3 H L L . tie a "Z � .o ° E v 0 4' � ' a ° v° ° a c a' = 4 a as _a a H H N _ = a to ° E ea CU ci. C v U, N m H .0 u C y c0 E a MI C O u • a L ca to y UI... • a. �'O .. a Q E -' o v- L Y 0 O. i ` 40) tea.°' O v ° O E> ° v v a, C y fi71-1 +' -C a 0 o i 4 r C '4r S3 CU t Ev i * i 0.) D. -C•C O ca a C ° ` , _ .0 = vo a, s a nHa, a = u C Nvs c in C -a a9 = a 0 4-. a c O Cr O as 3 t. •C CO u � � r cn = i a• a ++ ' ill a+ 5 E .. , C 'a +0+ a+ C c 'C7 c VI Q1 = of aLCU NI O 1 'a ca j df �,cu Ou C C .� •= -' a c 4a 2. a .- r ._ fO a 3 ' c n .0 3a) n3 +, 3 4. 4" ou Q o, a cv o „� 03 u 4, E m 3 aJ .c }, a, a C v +� v -4F.. c tr 494 ..c cu 'a .o m t t a. ,.. b0 tz L u C 4, 0 z v aCU to) te. 2 E i 0) N E c C7 H 4- a U co N u . L = O 4 y a� c c C Q ++ Imo— Z Q O Z = u `C C 'a +�' 6 a Q . i- 4M, E Q o �.. .E 2 Z . bb s j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13;or No, the request does not require a determination that the change will result in a substantial deviation. As noted above, the request will not increase density/intensity, traffic generation, non-residential land uses, or decrease environmental areas. The request does not meet any of the criterion outlined in F.S.380.06(19)(e)2. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13 No, based upon meetings with Staff on January 4th the request is not a substantial modification to the PUD, and may be processed as a PDI pursuant to the LDC and Administrative Code. CONCLUSION: • In summary, the proposed Insubstantial Change will allow modifications specific to the San Marino PUD to support the Applicant's single-family residential development program, as proposed on the pending PPL construction plans. The proposed modifications will allow for enhanced design flexibility, and a PUD document that is current with the existing conditions. This application will not negatively impact public health, safety or welfare, and the PUD will remain consistent with the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP). The following items are enclosed for your review: 1. A check in the amount of$2,025 for the application fees; 2. Sixteen(16) copies of the completed PDI Application; 3. One(1)copy of e-mail from Ray Bellows waiving the pre-application meeting requirement; 4. Sixteen(16)copies of the Cover Letter/Project Narrative detailing the purpose of the request; 5. Sixteen (16) copies of the Current Master Plan & 1 reduced copy(8%'x 11"); 6. Sixteen (16)copies of the Revised Exhibit B, Parcel B PUD Master Plan(24"x36"& 11"x17"); 7. Sixteen (16)copies of the Revised Section V, Developer Commitments,of the PUD document in strikethrough/underline format; 8. Sixteen (16)copies of the Revised Section VI,Schedule of Deviations,of the PUD document in strikethrough/underline format; 9. Sixteen (16)copies of the Requested Deviations and Justifications; 10. Sixteen (16)copies of the Southern Buffer Cross Sections; 11. Sixteen(16)copies of the Certified Letter; 12. Two(2)copies of PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance#; San Marino—PDI Cover Letter Page 5 of 6 13. Two (2)copies of the Recorded Warranty Deed; 14. Two(2) copies of the Legal Description; 15. One (1)original and one(1)copy of the executed Affidavit of Authorization with list of parties in organization; 16. One(1)copies of the approved Addressing Checklist; 17. One(1)copies of the Location Map(8.5"X11");and 18. Three (3)copies of the entire submittal documents on CDROM. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239)405-7777 or alexis.crespoPwaldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING,P.A. r� ,6 9 Alexis V.Crespo,AICP, LEED AP Vice President of Planning Enclosures 11111cc: Keith Gelder,Stock Development i San Marino—PDI Cover letter Page 6 of 6 SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PD1) • PDI-PL20160000263 APPLICATION • • Co [ier County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PDI) LDC subsection 10.02.13 E&Code of Laws section 2-83—2-90 Ch.3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION •Name of Applicant(s): SD San Marino LLC do Keith Gelder Address: 2647 Professional Circle Suite 1201 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34110 Telephone: 239-449-5227 Cell: 239-280-6504 Fax: 239-592-7541 E-Mail Address: kgelder@stockdevelopment.com Name of Agent: Alexis Crespo, AICP See Page 2 of Application. 11 50 26 Folio#: pp . Section: Twp: Range: p Engineering,Waldro En ineerin Firm: , P.A. Address: 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. 305 City: Bonita Springs State: FL ZIP: 34135 Telephone: 239-405-7777 Cell: 239-850-8525 Fax: 239-405-7899 E-Mail Address: alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com i 6/17/2015 Page 1 of S CoLier County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION I Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? f l Yes ❑ No 0 1. If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name the beneficiaries below. ❑ 2. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation,so indicate and name officers and major stockholders below. ❑ 3. If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate and name principals below. Q 4. If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners,if any. 0 5. If applicant is a lessee,attach copy of lease,and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. • ❑ 6. If applicant is a contract purchaser,attach copy of contract,and indicate actual owner(s) name and address below: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet,attached to the application,describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. PROPERTY INFORMATION � I PUD NAME: San Marino PUD ORDINANCE NUMBER: 2015-30 FOLIO NUMBER(S): 00411440000;00410980002;00411640004;00410840009;00410640005;00411320007;00410880001;00411240006;00411200004 Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. • Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? Yes■ ❑ ❑ No 6/17/2015 Page 2 of 5 Colter County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 If no, please explain: Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? 0 Yes 0 No If yes, in whose name? Stock Development Has any portion of the PUD been 0 SOLD and/or❑ DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? 0 Yes ❑ No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. Please see attached cover narrative/cover letter. • I 6/17/2015 Page 3 of 5 9A9y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal,the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items In the exact order listed below,with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW #OF REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 16 0 0 Pre-Application Meeting notes 1 0 a Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes i and why amendment is necessary 16 0 ❑ Detail of request 1e 0 0 Current Master Plan&1 Reduced Copy ,e n 0 Revised Master Plan& 1 Reduced Copy ie z Revised Text and any exhibits 18 x :: -E PUD document with changes crossed through&underlined 16 x0' 0 PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance# +e x0 0 Warranty Deed Legal Description O 0 Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended 0 0 n L1 If PUD is platted, include plat book pages 71 i List identifying Owner&all parties of corporation 2 x0 0 Affidavit of Authorization,signed&notarized 2 C 0 I Completed Addressing Checklist 1 0 Copy of 8 Y2 in.x 11 in.graphic location map of site 1 x 0 i Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise:The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials 0 0 0 i to be submitted electronically in PDF format. *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing,include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. • 6/17/2015 Page 4 of 5 I Co er County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 PLANNERS—INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District(Residential Components):Amy ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Lockheart Executive Director ❑ Utilities Engineering:Kris VanLengen ❑ Parks and Recreation:Vicky Ahmad ❑ Emergency Management:Dan Summers ❑ Naples Airport Authority:Ted Soliday ❑ Conservancy of SWFL:Nichole Ryan ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples:Robin Singer,Planning Director ❑ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS PUD Amendment Insubstantial(PDI):$1,500.00 0 Pre-Application Meeting:$500.00 R Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 The completed application,all required submittal materials,and fees shall be submitted to: 410 Growth Management Department/Planning and Regulation ATTN:Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,FL 34104 / ,4,, ( 2/4/2016 Applicant/Owner Si:nature Date Alexis Crespo Applicant/Owner Name(please print) • 6/17/2015 Page 5 of 5 SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) • PDI-P120160000263 EMAIL FROM RAY BELLOWS WAIVING PRE-APPLICATION REQUIREMENT , • • Lindsay Rodriguez • From: BellowsRay <RayBellows@colliergov.net> Sent: Monday, February 01,2016 2:04 PM To: Alexis Crespo Cc: StrainMark;AshtonHeidi;GundlachNancy;Lindsay Rodriguez Subject: RE:San Marino PDI- Pre-Application Meeting Waiver Hi Alexis, I agree,the pre-application meeting can be waived in this case. Please let me know if I can be of any other assistance. Ray Raymond V. Bellows,Zoning Manager Zoning Division-Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department—Planning&Regulation Telephone:239.252.2463;Fax:239.252.6350 Collier County From:Alexis Crespo[mailto:Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com] • Sent:Monday, February 01, 2016 11:47 AM To:BellowsRay Cc:StrainMark;AshtonHeidi;GundlachNancy;Lindsay Rodriguez Subject:San Marino PDI-Pre-Application Meeting Waiver Hi Ray, We are finalizing the PDI application to amend the following transportation commitment that was discussed during our meeting on January 4th "Commitment 5.5.F. New driveway connections for the development of Parcel B must align with the existing directional median opening,approximately 800'+south of the Northerly property line." Can you provide an email waiving the pre-application meeting requirement based upon our informal meeting with Staff? Thanks! Alexis V.Crespo,AICP, LEED AP Vice President of Planning [tM WALDROP i� ENGINEERING CM.4 EAciEEWN4 KtANtrAC LANDSCAPE MentrEen.AE Direct:E:alexisc@waldropengineering.com J C:(239)850-8525 Office:P:(239)405-7777 I F:(239)405-7899 1 SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 • CURRENT MASTER PLAN (ORD. NO. 1 • • .:..,,w.IK f,^'x.;0,,,itk.niaLw.0}::^.[".i 1.ne3,).:4-A,H A"44,g>.:;ytt .-_ 0',,,,XNkA..tl:441/2. 3,04`iN p£Ic :i.,,,,+s,..,,,..s...,..4+.ma.,,Ai2%?'< ;:: ,.',. i.,WIiu'rtY4.awYuh] lY SAIIhke'irAWW$'Fs:4i.iinu iN wKB0MH EXHIBIT B PARCEL B PUD MASTER PLAN I , ill P. i Y N ,+ P IX 111 g111 : 2 ii 3ig 31 R t f Iii Q /14 COLLIER � A� �}ppij _... eLwlcRes� g51 1 IV{ ~ 2 Si smf vMwa, 2 111 g w g 5g 1 ,I f, g '3. 1 ill li 2111 . u i1j! 1 i ii i 2 g 1 /' ti3 '// 1 . ISI `° ®� i\s1r �. , i FAilik16.4M4, ,,' i i i I , ir , e e> ) , > i ,› - I I 1 . 4 1 101 prdi ill Raw 1 ''\ AI rIlinkir711111 4 111111111111g 11 4 1 4 k i iiiillgilill .1 in 1 " 1 1 „T„,,fflT...r y'*"K—... A' k N xns rwarawo \I o ,. , , I ,Alli $3 Ii ,< '� e 8 c = I� 0 1 1� , - i j orouvoLIILMM ALOY17114 "i u INI WAL DROP °�." """�„"�` °°"�"' SAN MARINO g i 1 %WM PM COATiwtrco PM COOT,oowilrla ENGINEERINGa, MAIM o ooy CLIENT:II&LI)VENTURE,URE,L.L.C. �,,�'"..... I YE - a4flE11 svieeo PIM cawnoaue%m PARCEL•E'MD MAgra PLAN •-. ��"••••�•• ONT II � EXHIBIT.C -- PUDA-PL-2014-0100 Strike-through text is deleted San Marino RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised:April 17, 2015 Page 30 of 33 SAN MARINO RPUD • INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 • i I REViSED EXHIBIT B ( PARCEL B PUD MASTER PLAN) • • • • 1 P, P N r. a P3 ii; a1 ZcP 1T a ; a T 5 • p7. y? cz Am 060 a� a Q o� mD g� mm ' i E z f g Cr v S 2rry ;g ?..2 ...474 ill I 71 Do Fm..zo m Z COLLIER BLw RRlI m�11 m 2> 0 ic_..›,3i -(= D5A NFt�0ER90M fAEEx CMJK Sy m m T{ 2 T Di r BUFFER arrmp A P= A D< mm mC 2 223 0 1 1 z m �a --1 D 1) 1 _Z�.,,_ mom `" �� o�c3t oz-E2 w • • n I . m . - - -. m I 4 I -• gmg. o o "1cZi . • n W a 1 . -17 SOm xipAm` [m" • i �I ' i 1'1 Zm oCD MxC 'l D 9 V ?: i pa m yr DD mp - z0 Z <o • - _ ♦ ^ 10TYFE'A•BUFFEA ,� , ---_ 1 - gigilituoll !!!! : 51 51.111 1 4 Li gi i §j 1 3sf s}ij[ , • S v ` R \ __��__ i SP. 4 e 1 § ' i § i i i sl i loom" • .,- A 1 / 1 ------- ... i 1: , m .- b a >r 1II # # / i -, i\ Y ° ] e i 1 ,, 1 S n 10 TYFE'R OR-11-BUFFER NOOFFER RE°WREB g g 1.4 gl at . 4 # il k• .TwiwAR E 1 „, m 33 ; m r ,. t 2 R G y m Z Z o 1 10,1 a A 11 _ t ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL:02/03/18 0 'PLAN REVISIONS •+� A, 03/23/18 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS SAN 7L ,( ♦RlNO WALDROP ®p ouso/18 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS l�/1�"]RI ENGMEERING a, 05/10118 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS — 05/19/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS - CLIENT:H&LD VENTURE,L.L.C. [� ® 06/09/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS PARCEL"B"PUD MASTER PLANu+Ill•IIIIPII +MIES r EXHIBIT B 300401„°ft°`.,.',:,0 XX ::.: SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 REVISED TEXT (SECTION V) • • , • , , • • SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * 5.3 PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD amendment approval dated 2014, 2016, the Managing Entity is 14 & LD Venture, LLC SD San Marino, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing • Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. I � * * * * * * * * * * * * * 5.85 TRAFFIC A. The applicant shall install arterial level street lighting at the project entrances, prior to the granting of any Certificates of Occupancy for the project. B. The applicant shall provide, if required by Collier County Transportation Services, both a northbound right turn lane and a southbound left turn lane at the project entrances, which shall be constructed during the construction of the project's access driveways onto County Road 951. C. A potential vehicular interconnection to the agriculturally zoned property to the north may be provided if a mutual agreement is reached with the owners to address coordinated designed, and responsibility for permitting, construction and maintenance costs, and other applicable access considerations, including any bridge and turn land improvements. At the time of subdivision plat for the first phase of development, the developer • must provide staff with documentation of their efforts to establish the Words underlined are added;works str-usk threugh are deleted. interconnection in the form of a certified letter to the adjacent property owner. D. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 493 Two-way unadjusted PM Peak Hour trips. E. The Owner, its successor, or assign(s)agrees to provide proportionate fair share payment to Collier County for a traffic signal and appurtenances at any project entrance, when and if warranted. F. New driveway connections for the development of Parcel B must align with . the access point shown on the PUD Master Plan for Parcel B. • . Words underlined are added;works strusk-thr-Gugt4 are deleted. SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) • PDI-PL20160000263 REVISED TEXT (SECTION VI ) • • SECTION VI • DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC * * * * * * * * * * * * * The following deviations are applicable to Parcel B only: 2. Deviation(2)from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2,Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks which are internal to the development to be constructed on both sides of local streets, to allow a 6'-wide sidewalk on one side of the street only for streets with homes on one side of the street-rand --. One canopy tree (or canopy tree equivalent) shall be provided per 30 linear feet of sidewalk. Canopy trees located within 10 feet of the sidewalk may count towards a sidewalk canopy tree. This deviation does not apply to the main entry road depicted on the PUD Master Plan for Parcel B. 4. Deviation (4) from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, which permits a maximum fence or wall height of 6 feet in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum fence, wall or berm height of 8 feet throughout the development, and a 12-foot tall fencewall, or berm height, Of along Collier Blvd., and along the southern boundary line • where the RPUD abuts the Willow Run RPUD. * * * * * * * * * * * * * SII Ill � II Words underlined are added;works strums are deleted. SAN MARINO RPUD • INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 DEVIATION & JUSTIFICATION NARRATIVE • WALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS •: _ P e„W }i 9 " • 4 H JUSTIFICATIONS FOR REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC SAN MARINO RPUD REVISED MAY 2016 Deviation (1) from LDC Section 2.03.07D.4.g, which requires TDR credits to be redeemed at a rate proportional to percentage of the PUD approved gross density that is derived through TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits,to allow for use of the PUD's base density prior to the redemption of TDR credits. The following deviations are applicable to Parcel"B"only. Deviation No. 2: Deviation#2 from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2,Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks which are internal to the development to be constructed on both sides of local streets, to allow a 6'-wide sidewalk on one side of the street only for streets with homes on one side of the streetrafiel . _ - - . • _ •• •- • .•- -• - -:.One canopy tree(or canopy tree equivalent.)shall be provided per 30 linear feet of sidewalk. Canopy trees located within 10 feet of the sidewalk may count towards a sidewalk canopy tree. This deviation does not apply to the main entry road depicted on the PUD Master Plan for Parcel B. • Justification:The above modifications to Deviation#2 recognizes that the main entry road is being shifted south away from the northern property line via this PDI application.As such,there will be residential streets to the north and south of the main entry road,whereas the previous design only located residential streets to the south. Based upon the proposed location of the main entry roadway,it is appropriate to locate sidewalks on both sides of this roadway to facilitate pedestrian movement throughout the project.Therefore, the deviation language is modified to clarify that the deviation for sidewalks on one (1) side of roadways does not apply to the main entry road based on its new location. Deviation No.3: Deviation#3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N,Street System Requirements and Appendix B,Typical Street Sections and Right-Of-Way Design Standards,which establishes a 60-foot wide local road to allow a minimum 40-foot wide local road. Deviation No. 4: Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, which permits a maximum fence or wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts. The requested deviation is to allow a maximum fence,wall or berm height of 8 feet throughout the development,and a 12-foot tall fencewall,or berm height, along Collier Blvd., and along the southern boundary line where the RPUD abuts the Willow Run RPUD. Justification:The requested modification to this deviation will allow for the option to provide a wall, fence,berm,or fence/wall/berm combination along the shared boundary lines with the neighboring • San Marino PDI Deviation Narrative Page 1 of 2 • PUD to the south, Willow Run. This is in addition to the approved fence/wall/berm heights along Collier Boulevard and around the project perimeter. The proposed 12-foot fence/wall/berm combination will mitigate potential visual and noise impacts from the neighboring residential tracts within Willow Run. The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening between the proposed residential uses, while ensuring a quality design aesthetic via screening of the wall by required perimeter plantings.Willow Run is permitted for multi- family buildings up to 75 feet in height, while San Marino is strictly limited to single-family dwelling types at a maximum height of 35 feet.Therefore,the additional wall/fence/berm height will enhance compatibility, and assist in screening differing residential uses, building heights, and associated densities across these projects. Deviation 5: Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5, Model Homes and Model Sales Centers, which permits a maximum of five (5) model homes, or a number corresponding to ten (10) percent of the total number of platted lots, whichever is less, per platted approved development prior to final plat approval. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of six (6) model homes per development tract, not to exceed 17 model homes within the overall RPUD. As part of the application material for every building permit for a model home,the developer shall provide documentation stating how many model homes are in existence so that the maximum of 17 model homes is not exceeded. Deviation 6: Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, Temporary Signs, which allows • temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height. The requested deviation is to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height.The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 28 days per calendar year. Deviation 7: Deviation#7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, Development Standards for Signs within Residential Districts,which permits two(2)ground signs per entrance to the development with a maximum height of 8'and total sign area of 64 square feet.The requested deviation is to allow for two(2)ground signs per project entrance with a maximum height of 10'and total sign area of 80 square feet per sign. Deviation 8: Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02C., Buffer Requirements, which requires a fifteen foot (15') Type "B" landscape buffer where single-family residential uses are proposed adjacent to multi-family residential uses,to allow a ten foot(10')Type"B"buffer where proposed single-family dwellings in the San Marino RPUD are adjacent to multi-family dwellings in the Willow Run RPUD along the southern and eastern property lines, and where proposed single-family dwellings are adjacent to multi-family dwellings in Aventine at Naples to the south. • San Marino PDI Deviation Narrative Page 2 of 2 SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) . PDI-PL20160000263 SOUTHERN BUFFER CROSS SECTIONS • • L • I I �Ait I 4 i...? T O m z o n I O CmO mEC n r 2 to Z m w �Zz r , o _____, ri"°"" ilip r 13 iw mf -o XI 0 C Z Cm m KA? mEnOMmz 4 11 t 03 ZI U 1 r 11!iI Ii O ` i t • __ )I. 1. 10'WIDE I 11 C 7? c f ' i 0 L • 1 4/40- -, sii 1: 4 CL N434 ' m 4 a n 1 ©I O toC A ©) OaI 1 00 m ' C Z ii.""‹ .C2 IP • vw M 0 1 ©) m T 7:1 1 -4W m C c ©) VI -1} D-< Q "nzi 1 N : 4I1 akii ,-, z �� Z 03 0 a L 0o 1 ©) 0 1 111 € ?? D t}, } E;;, .., J i i g.5 1* G ! ' O11 lhiieI g.5 15'WVDEl i, . Cif , c, _ __ 1 SAN MARINO RPUD • INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 CERTIFIED LETTER • • DEVELOPMENTill January 21,2016 Diocese of Venice Attn: Dr.Volodymyr Smeryk 1000 Pinebrook Road Venice,FL 34285 Re:36 acres—Collier Boulevard,Naples,FL(#00410680007) Dr.Smeryk, You are receiving this letter in reference to your 36-acre vacant parcel located on Collier Boulevard in Naples,FL. As you may be aware, our 196-acre property immediately to the south (San Marino RPUD Ord. 15-30) was approved earlier this year to allow for the development of a maximum of 300 single family homes. The zoning ordinance also provides for a potential vehicular interconnection between properties as shown on the attached PUD Master Plan.Although the future use of your property has not yet been determined,we are offering to incorporate an access point to your property in the engineering design and master planning efforts for our project. The preliminary design for our project entrance features a CON/SPAN bridge to cross the 951 canal,a 2-lane undivided entry road,turn lanes, sidewalks,monument signage, street lighting,etc. If you wish to participate in the design and construction of an access point to serve your property in conjunction • with our project,we will proceed with preparing a Development Agreement&Cost Sharing Agreement that will outline the initial capital requirements and on-going maintenance obligations. Our expectation would be a 50/50 split of all costs and expenses associated with the design and construction of the bridge crossing, entry roads, and accompanying capital improvements. The preliminary cost estimate prepared by our civil engineer indicates the total improvement costs will be approximately$3,000,000. Please respond in writing within thirty (30) days with your Notice of Intent to participate in the design. If no response is received,this offer will become null and void and we will proceed with the design without any vehicular interconnection. If you have any questions regarding this project, please feel free to contact me directly at (239) 592-7344 or kgelder(astockdevelopment.com. Sincerely, feeSA Keith elder, Vice President of Land SD San Marino,LLC • . '-mar ead iI t ' .• ,i.. - z- •., �..i�Glen Blvd ., ��"`�-"�' 1,,,� _ � ,�fi '7 i`'��j . e —r cc) w x - •....1------. 1 Forest Glen G f��! �. d CountryClub-"'!r '"4� ,, ��. '1yCedarHammock Gof t ::\ ` j , t `i�� 6Country Club �? � •�.,Y/' � j 511, I F ..Cela- w 11 oreWr ,N.y '` ``"r 1`o ` .'! I 1 ; ►} iii 's .` t> {. ) 1- SAN MARINO -,\, q,"" y se 1 m r~ a' t °v° ' I - 4 a''�_._ v - = , _ , ; `� i 1 X11 rpt . , v: ' 4 �� Napless Heritage Gol t ` 7a7 ,...----••t'• '-- &Country Club , 11 (j(t 1. 1114 ii 4 & i - IS � San Marino _ �, - + , `j• Apartments - r f ` .a 1.. 0 k' 4 } ! 4 ` ` i r_ SAN MARINO AERIAL MAPGA) "1.1"7„...._ . R , ,utans • _ _ - - Prepared For: H & LD Venture, LLC 1 ,,:,,,..,,,,,,,,,..:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,s4.4.,„„,,„„:_,,,,,,,a,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,-.4-,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,.,vm4.44.44...v.k,..,-.....,,,,,,,...,,,„:,,,,,,...,,.„„4,,,,,,,„„...,„,„...,,,-....„.4,,,,,.,,,,„„,..„,,,,,„„„,„:„,„„,;.„-..„,„,„,„„„.,..,,,;„,,, EXHIBIT B PARCELELEVILMAIIERELAN. 0O 11 , 1 0 0; a r•-• i & a' Pi 111 ii I:1 li gill! NI I A/ A gl. 1 gg 1 IIIIM 111 i ill I I, & iplohl _ ---- 1 .,..vCCILIERIumot BLVD/CR ii-1— --- nit ..c r $ 0 I gi , lit il' !I a g 1 , 1 It( 11 1111 ill It! op P * 1 . . i 1 ji g rli • 0 III '4 it ,. 4 rati.Naa trAr P....1.9.MI.10167:41...'1.'..7.0.1s..;:t;_, g W;A 1 t tormiligy:teiti ill 1 . ffitabiltAl 11111116-1:4111 1/1 .K 1 A g , 111111111inil i 1 . i1 1 . . , ; 11111 41111 P \ * ;„ i:`,-. I , - ,.: Ili I 1 , il •..k ,I( x44 Ix ,,,......7+Hfrif- , _ . ,„.. i 1 '&' 11111 1 I 1 , . _ .... 1 ill!! P 2 1$ 113 it a o :I 6pX ICS 0 tV .i -I .... _HIA111.... .......inaltr.......,WAILDHOP Mafil"LIIIID' Pel COUNTr1214111N13 SAI4 MARINO *1' WPM WOW Pen=MTV LOMISNTS ,"MI5 IMI'ID„AMA / QOM li&II)VENTURE.L.L.C. pARaz"11.PUD MOTU?LAW fiV1010 NIVWNO P111137XWIVAINIXT11 ,J ......................1 Zainirr X 2.===alltaill''..-...111CMA-. -.., EXHIBIT Q 410 PUDA-PL-2014-0100 Strike-tivetifp text is deleted San Manna RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised April 17,2015 Page 30 of 33 3�S'�dst�l Serv►ce�' CERTIFIED 1311t 'RECEIPT m ,pcjmeatiic rtrarr onry i5i1 Du�v.eb A[Cat.Vtww i F .tont'. d131rvcryirlfotm Ilion v, rq ..LI PeihA. .D (u Codified roe Poetise* rapt Foe 11111111111111 Nero t (Endo w men Rolm Aaqutted) Q Roottotod Doltvory Fes 111.1111111111111 O wimntReau1'edl nI rlTotal Poeteps&Foot(MEM Ill 4110• Ili • • SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) • PDI-PL20160000263 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO PUD DOCUMENT FOR CAO i • San Marino RPUD Amend Ordinance 15-30 AMENDMENT TO SECTION V, SECTION VI, AND EXHIBIT B PARCEL B PUD MASTER PLAN OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 15-30, SAN MARINO RPUD. The"Developer Commitments,"labeled as Section V of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 15-30, the San Marino RPUD. "Deviations from LDC,"labeled as Section VI of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 15-30,the San Marino RPUD. "Exhibit B Parcel B PUD Master Plan"attached to Ordinance No. 15-30,the San Mario RPUD, is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced by Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 41 • SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 • RECORDED WARRANTY DEED • • INSTR 5185701 OR 5206 PG 1326 RECORDED 10/21/2015 12:09 PM PAGES 7 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc19.70 $131,250.00 REC $61.00 CONS $18,750,000.00 • Prepared by: Law Offices of William G. Morris, P.A. 247 North Collier Boulevard, Suite 202 Marco Island, FL 34145 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE is made and entered into as of the Zb day of October, 2015, by and between H & LD Venture, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantor"),whose mailing address Is 7995 Mahogany Run Lane, Naples, Florida 34113, and SD San Marino, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is 2647 Professional Circle, Unit 1201, Naples, FL 34119. WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for • •- -• consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and oth- •��$n�'> ,. - consideration in hand paid, the receipt and sufficiency whereo a 0- • ac no'• -:• • has granted, bargained,sold, alienated, remised, release., 6 eyed and confir :•, nd by these presents does hereby grant, bargain,sell, :lie .te e-•lse rele.se,c• ve and confirm unto Grantee, and Grantee's heirs, succes •rs `• as •ns • ever, th- following described real • property in the County of Coli AND INCO• • 7r,..-Th • I RE- • ( THERETO, TOGETHER with all th _ •ements,heredit. • appurtenances,and every privilege, right, title, interest -nit- tate, reversio ei • nder and easement thereto belonging or in anywise appert•; • • - - ' - Property"). �E CR- SUBJECT TO the encumbrances an• - ceptions described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference thereto (collectively, "Permitted Exceptions"); provided, however, that neither Grantor nor Grantee Intend to reimpose any Permitted Exceptions nor shall this conveyance operate to reimpose or extend any Permitted Exceptions. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to the Property, subject to and except for the Permitted Exceptions, and will defend the same, subject to and except for the Permitted Exceptions, against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. [SIGNATURES CONTAINED ON FOLLOWING PAGE] • OR 5206 PG 1327 S IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused these presents to be signed and sealed the day and year above written. Signed, sealed and delivered H & LD Venture, LLC, in the pre of: a Flo . • mated I II/ pany • gature).4_y By: P(Witness ✓1 p Name: "•seph D. Boff Print Witness Nam: 11 L.{%!.0-. 11D1� .(&its: - ager (� GI.L �7l�til.0 (h.1.4--O„ (Witness Signature) Print Witness Name: . McP I7 STATE OF FLORIDA • COUNTY OF COLLIER Q I: V H The foregoing lnstr ITe t was ac nowle..1;d b_for • - this j gnday of October, 2015, by Joseph D. Boff, : 4,e Manager, of Ln it re, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on behai . :id company. K - -I- one]: ( personally known ..Me,;. orCTRC��ti ( ) produced a valid driver's license as ide tifica on. •' B4.1.1%, Notary P 1•liS�gnatur ) aQ`;"•�:�F PEGU.EEH.MORR15 Print Name: q5 * t MY MISSION t FF 142593 EXPIRES:J4 17,21318 +h„M1,�' c,k,anNo o�h,�yc� My Commission Expires:6VLy , 1a e 2 OR 5206 PG 1328 I Exhibit"A" TRACT l: Parcel ID: 0041084009 The Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and Parcel ID: 00411200004. Parcel!): 00411240006. and Parcel ID: 0041088001, The Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township SO South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and Parcel ID: 00411320007 The Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/ _of-S�, • 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and 1IER CLW, Parcel ID: 00410640005 C.. The Southeast 1/4 of the N. h es of ecti 11, •w hip 50 South, Range 26 • East, Collier County, Florida; an 0 .90 Parcel ID: 00411640004 n 1. E-4 The North 1/2 of the North 1 is the Southwest o t •rthwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 .= Collier County, ''orb.. - s the West 100 feet; and Parcel ID: 0041096000Z QFI ITEC�RCl� The South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Sou ' -s 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less the West 100 feet; and Parcel ID: 0 0411440 00 0 The North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less the West 100 feet. Being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the West 1/4 corner of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East of Collier County, Florida; thence along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, N 00 degrees 50'48" E, a distance of 344.19 feet, to the Southwest corner of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; thence leaving the said West line and along the South line of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, N 87 degrees 55'08" E, a distance of 100.13 feet, to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described; thence • N 00 degrees 50'48" E, a distance of 1032.30 feet, being 100.00 feet Easterly and parallel to the said West line; thence along the North line of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, N 88 degrees 04'51" E, a distance of 1234.18 feet to the Southwest corner of Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 oR 5206 PG 1329 • of said Section 11; thence along the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; N 00 degrees 49'48" E, a distance of 1371.72 feet, to the Northwest corner of Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; N 88 degrees 1749" E, a distance of 1333.66 feet, to the North 1/4 corner of said Section 11; thence along the North line of Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11, N 88 degrees 17'56" E, a distance of 1333.62 feet, to the Northeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the East line of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11, S 00 degrees 47'44" W, a distance of 2723.17 feet to the Southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the East to West 1/4 line of said Section 11, S 87 degrees 51'54" W, a distance of 2669.89 feet to the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11; thence along the west line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, N 00 degree 49'48" E, a distance of 342.93 feet to the Southeast corner of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11; thence along the South line of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, S : •;ame• 1"8" W, a distance of 1234.66 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parce•etc%.•eit#e.- r y AND: TRACT 2• C41111 • n I` Mitigation Parcel :Parce •. + s :4• .00 4' The West 1/2 of the Northw_• 4 of the South,--4;y: /- . he Northeast 1/4 of Section 31, Township 49 Sout ••e 27 East, Co - �' , Florida. • M"•a ion • - - • •a el ID#• � �:lo . \r- The North 1/2 of the North 1/2 o' ' . of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 3: Parcel ID#: 00352680000 The East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 less the East 35 feet thereof dedicated for road purposes, and the East 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 , less the East 35 feet thereof dedicated for road purposes of Section 35, Township 49 south, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 4: Parcel IDS: 00350720001 The East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4, less the East 35 feet of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 5:Parcel ID#: 00351480007 The West 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4, less the West 35 feet thereof, of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. 411 Mitigation Parcel 6:Parcel ID#: 00352160009 OR 5206 PG 1330 • The East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4, less the East 35 feet thereof dedicated for road purposes, and the West 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the south 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4, less the West 35 feet thereof dedicated for road purposes, and the West 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4, less the West 35 feet thereof dedicated for road purposes of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 7:Parcel ID#: 00352880004 The South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, less and except the East 35 feet thereof. Mitigation Parcel 8:Parcel ID#: 00455120001, The Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 9: ParceLID#• 0s is cAiii1. The North 1/2 of the West 1/2 o st 1/2 of •� 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 23, T p 50 South, Rang- ` 7 ast, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation_Parcel 10:Parc I 8#: Of74.,l_00 I • The North 1/2 of the East /2 I• •� f-7. a outheast 1/4 of Section 2, Township 51 South, Range E.s. C. ii- o fi ` . C.) Mitigation Parcel 11: Parc oil #: 00746880 � r The Northeast 1/4 of the So • =st 1/4 AND th- . --t i .f the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, To 7T ... 51 South, Ra rig st, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 12:Parcel ID • O.OhYdc g \- The South 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the ,.rg 'TJ • of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 13:Parcel ID#: 00450840001. The North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitiaation Parcel 14: Intentionally omitted Mitigation Parcel 15 Parcel ID#: 00746960006 The West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 2, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Mitigation Parcel 16: Parcel ID: 0034996005 The East 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, less the East 35 feet thereof, dedicated for road purposes and the East 1/2 • of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, less the East 35 feet thereof, dedicated for road purposes, all lying and being in Section 35, Township 49 South , Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. OR 5206 PG 1331 410 EXHIBIT B Permitted Exceptions 1. Taxes and assessments for the year 2015 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. 2. Florida Power&Light Company Right-of-Way Agreement recorded In Official Records Book 663, Page 594. (as to Tract 1). 3. Florida Power&Light Company Right-of-Way Agreement recorded in Official Records Book 664, Page 1488. (as to Tract 1) 4. Florida Power&Light Company Right-of-Way Agreement recorded in Official Records Book 666, Page 521. (as to Tract 1) 5. Resolution No. CWS-85-4 recor 110 7c Book 1142, Page 1796. (as to Tract 1) 6. Easements contained in Ord aking recorded in icl. Records Book 3927,Page 3243. (as to Tract 1) 7. Temporary Construction as- - L/ :. : . T.king recorded in Official Records • Book 4030, Page 2363. ( s • ra 8. Property is subject to Colli +unty Ordinance ind/�'r • utions which establish mandatory garbage and solid waste c Von in Collier Co ,5 , -al, -perty is subject to ail assessments made under said Ordinance Oolutions. (as to .nd 2) 9. The nature, extent or existence , rf . -. s. .- to Tracts 1 and 2) 10. Rights of predecessors in title,and all persons claiming by,through or under same,by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described in Schedule A,as recorded in Deed Book 30, Page 91, as affected by Notice of Interest recorded in Official Records Book 4586, Page 412. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 1, 2,3,4, 5,6, 7 and 16) 11. Rights of predecessors in title,and all persons claiming by,through or under same,by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described in Schedule A, as recorded in Deed Book 33, Page 445. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 1) 12. Rights of predecessors in title,and all persons claiming by,through or under same,by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described in Schedule A, as contained in Deed Book 36, Page 378. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 2) 13. Rights of predecessors in title, and all persons claiming by, through or under same, by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described in Schedule A, as recorded In Deed Book 40, Page 185. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 3,4, 5, 6, 7 and 16) 14. Rights of predecessors in title,and all persons claiming by,through or under same,by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described *** OR 5206 PG 1332 *** • in Schedule A, as recorded in Official Records Book 6, Page 269, Official Records Book 6, Page 270 and Official Records Book 6, Page 273. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 13) 15. Restrictions and right of way reservation set forth in the Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 25, Page 608. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 1) 16. Rights of predecessors In title,and all persons claiming by,through or under same, by virtue of the reservation, grant,or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described in Schedule A, as recorded in Official Records Book 613, Page 714, as affected by Notice of Interest recorded in Official Records Book 4598, Page 2925. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 8 and 9) 17. Rights of predecessors in title,and all persons claiming by,through or under same, by virtue of the reservation, grant, or lease of the oil, gas and/or minerals lying within the lands described In Schedule A, as recorded in Official Records Book 613, Page 730, as affected by Notice of Interest recorded in Official Records :_.• • •..a 2925. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 10, 11, 12and 15) y�� a ' �tJk 18. Easement for roadway � gran -d'4 •eed recorded In 0 cia •ecords Book 696,Page 575. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 9 • 19. Easement for roadway se, fo r`r:-, :-�.; 11. IRecords Book 697,Page 381. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel- 10r 120. Easement for roadway res-+ -din Deed record ffi a ' -cords Book 698,Page 451. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 9 7',7t, -4 O 21. Easement for roadwa c- G Y resery 0 eds record c i iai Records Book 742,Page 1214. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 8) CC� 22. Easement for roadway reserved in Deed recorded in Official Records Book 759,Page 1564. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 10, 11, 12 and 15) 23. Reservation of easement contained in Special Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 1362, Page 829. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 12) 24. Easement for roadway set forth in Deeds recorded in Official Records Book 2132, Page 313, Official Records Book 3194,Page 2705 and Official Records Book 3194,Page 2707. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcels 10, 11, 12 and 15) 25. Easement for roadway set forth in Deeds recorded in Official Records Book 2392, Page 3263. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 8) 30. Subject to terms and conditions of the"Collier County Transfer of Development Rights Program" as referenced in Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 3673, Page 2843. (As to Tract 2 Mitigation Parcel 3) . NOTE: ALL RECORDING REFERENCES SET FORTH ON THIS EXHIBIT"B"SHALL REFER TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • I . Legal Description of Property The Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida;and The Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida;and The Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida;and The Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida;and The North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida,less the West 100 feet;and The South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida,less the West 100 feet;and The North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida, less the West 100 feet. Being more particularly described as follows: • Commencing at the West 1/4 corner of Section 11,Township 50 South,Range 26 East of Collier County,Florida; thence along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11,N 00 degrees 50'48" E, a distance of 344.19 feet,to the Southwest corner of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; thence leaving the said West line and along the South line of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, N 87 degrees 55'08" E, a distance of 100.13 feet, to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described;thence N 00 degrees 50'48"E,a distance of 1032.30 feet, being 100.00 feet Easterly and parallel to the said West line; thence along the North line of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, N 88 degrees 04'51" E, a distance of 1234.18 feet to the Southwest corner of Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11;thence along the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11;N 00 degrees 49'48"E,a distance of 1371.72 feet,to the Northwest corner of Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11;thence along the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; N 88 degrees 17'49" E, a distance of 1333.66 feet, to the North 1/4 corner of said Section 11; thence along the North line of Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11,N 88 degrees 17'56"E,a distance of 1333.62 feet,to the Northeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the East line of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11, S 00 degrees 47'44" W, a distance of 2723.17 feet to the Southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 11; thence along the East to West 1/4 line of said Section 11, S 87 degrees 51'54" W, a distance of 2669.89 feet to the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11; thence along the west line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, N 00 degree 49'48" E, a distance of 342.93 feet to the Southeast corner of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11;thence along the South line of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11, S 87 degrees 55'08"W,a distance of 1234.66 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel described herein. SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) • PDI-PL20160000263 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION W/ LIST IDENTIFYING OWNER & ALL PARTIES OF CORPORATION • • . • AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PDI-PL20160000263 Wan Stock (print name),as Menars (title, if applicable)of no San Marine.LLC (company, If a Iicable),swear or affirm under oath,that I am the(choose one)owner ✓ applicantncontract purchasernand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s)requested and to Impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Waldrop Engineenng.PA.c/o Alexis Crew to act as our/my representative • in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: i If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp.pres. or v.Pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company(L.L.C.) or Limited Company(L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's"Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner"of the named partnership. • • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words"as trustee". • in each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated n it are true. Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me on k-a-ct-k (date)by c3v,c personproviding affirmation),of rovldin oath or affirmation , as wh• s-personally known to o'c or who has produced (type of identification)as identification. � � �� STAMPISEAL Signature of tary Public STACEY LYNN ANDERSON ; ,'\ Notary Public-State of Florida I 1 g �' •e My Comm.Expires Nov 1E,2017 :,...._ Commission Ir FF 067180 r '''•k;,;:,,' Bonded Through National Ndary Assn. CMS-CCM-00115U 55 REV 3/24/14 Detail by Entity Name Page I of 2 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE ¢ •�` � DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS .514,Zz Pt , Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company SD SAN MARINO,LLC Filing Information Document Number L15000161696 FEI/EIN Number NONE Date Filed 09/23/2015 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event LC STMNT OF AUTHORITY 21 Event Date Filed 10/13/2015 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 2647 PROFESSIONAL CIR#1201 NAPLES, FL 34119 Mailing Address 2647 PROFESSIONAL CIR#1201 NAPLES, FL 34119 Registered Agent Name&Address COLEMAN,YOVANOVICH&KOESTER,P.A. 4001 TAMIAMI TRL N#300 NAPLES, FL 34103-3556 Authorized Person(s)Detail Name&Address Title MGR STOCK, BRIAN K 2647 PROFESSIONAL CIR#1201 NAPLES,FL 34119 Annual Reports No Annual Reports Filed Document Images 10/13/2015--CORLCAUTH View image in PDF format 09/23/2015--Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format i http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchuytyP q .ResultDetail?in ii a=Entit... 11/24/2015 SAN MARINO RPUD . INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160000263 APPROVED COMPLETED ADDRESSING CHECKLIST • • Cor County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to ore-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE(Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL(Blasting Permit) 0 SDP(Site Development Plan) 0 BD(Boat Dock Extension) 0 SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI(Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU(Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP(Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI(Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat 0 SNR(Street Name Change) ❑ LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) 0 SNC(Street Name Change—Unplatted) ❑ PNC(Project Name Change) 0 TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL(Plans&Plat Review) 0 VA(Variance) • ❑ PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) 0 VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ(Standard Rezone) [] OTHER PDI LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Portions of Section 11 S 11 T 50 R 26 FOLIO(Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach to,or associate with,legal description if more than one) See attached Folio list. STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(as applicable,if already assigned) • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME(if applicable) San Marino RPUD PROPOSED STREET NAMES(if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) • SDP - or AR or PL# coir County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 Project or development names proposed for,or already appearing in,condominium documents(if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email 0 Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Lindsay Rodriguez Phone: 239-405-7777 Email/Fax: lindsay.rodriguez@waldropengineering.com • Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number See Attached Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: 1/26/2016 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED • SAN MARINO PUD FOLIO IDs 00411440000 00410960002 00411640004 00410840009 00410640005 00411320007 00410880001 00411240006 00411200004 • • SAN MARINO RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(POI) PDI-PL20160000263 LOCATION MAP S S • an •Marino RPUD Location Map ...... . -= NORTH ^r I I ` r..._........-_.... :!5--) -.-.2 -t----:p -- s-4 ''. .:t47 ) { F / r-- ',...-ifj- H- 'C. 8 ...._.1-) �...._ ) ) y 'PROJECT (4 4F. Li , i __ - -1 ! LOCATION til I • o1 • , J ciJ ;T St!A cs xn raCIIxt „ Ac C .....----- �� , , J • AGENDA ITEM 4-B Co-Mr Canty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING SERVICES SECTION,GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JUNE 23, 2016 SUBJECT: PORSCHE OF NAPLES. SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS, DR-PL20150002617 PROPERTY OWNER: Applicant: Agent: TT of Naples Kristina M. Johnson 505 S. Flagler Dr. Suite 700 J.R. Evans Engineering, P. A. West Palm Beach. FL 33401 9351 Corkscrew Road, Suite 102 Estero, FL 33928 REQUESTED ACTION: Petitioner, TT of Naples. requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks nine total deviations, including three deviations from LDC Section 4.02.16, relating to standards for commercial buildings and landscaping and buffering in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area; one deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05, relating to plant material standards for required landscaping; and five deviations from LDC Section 5.05.08. relating to architectural design standards for blank walls, roof treatments, building colors and materials, and parking structures, for a proposed Porsche dealership project consisting of 2.15±acres, GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side of Davis Blvd., just west of Airport- Pulling Road, in Section 2. Township 50 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida. (See location map on following page). DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 1 of 21 June 23,2016 9LOZ'£Z aunt LZ 10 z abed saideN;o ayosJod-L L9ZOOOS I.OZId-2IG 6 II Y r e F °: I O oeayshoro OR O M Alrport PullingRDs - 0) -p CD co: 0 z C 3 a CD z v -130 Ilill OM MEIN egimpwrwriali Cli 11111110 figl all MB/II morsom. ii Iwo tv ow-ma Or =.1. Inmairs int irL,1111 MIN SOT, El Mai um E. OM N 0 UMW iffii"%ws' 1111111115-4 tiim aim .,..„....400 Az. 1 Sall MI III ®all N =El �maNi Ca LSD MS Imo SIM MA 1461111111111 LSI EMS Mil O = E am MIM ■.-ir L mimmialmr t� it I II Ili1 Will I r1 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCELS: Existing equipment sales and repair with a zoning designation of C-5 GTMUD-MXD (Heavy Commercial District and Mixed Use District within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area(GTMUD-MXD)). SURROUNDING: North: Commercial business and Salvation Army with a zoning designation of C-5 GTMUD-MXD. East: Commercial business with a zoning designation of C-5 GTMUD- MXD. South: Davis Boulevard, commercial businesses with a zoning designation of C-5 GTMUD-MXD. West: Commercial business with a zoning designation of C-5 GTMUD-MXD II ,4'' . 291. w i •• ...' Subject Property' Caty (Tz t .11 ops 1 � � 4:1511 - � �;� urt o ski l, (1n1A * ♦� i �•,• _' li ,..1.... 1.:61 g.G '' WV UP ell I ri: am I I _ "'--- "".11 --; r_-- .-..si< '�,A v. rr.+.-,--. _ , , , ., F:1111 :t: - c r -iiir,, Yi,li,e=ii,ne , , t. .1slit f , , .., 1 0 3 �, - „. ...,..„1„.,. ..... _:, _ . .. ... 30„ -ir t 5 `, r. }4H - iTi, it 4 r ” ,( ,fir '� - . I +1 DR-P120150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 3 of 21 June 23,2016 Aerial Photo(not to scale) APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUESTED DEVIATION: The petitioner is seeking nine (9) deviations from the requirements of the Land Development Code(LDC). The deviations are listed below with staff analysis and recommendations. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.08 C.8.b. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.8.b. which states that control or expansion joints are considered blank wall area unless used as a decorative pattern and spaced at 120 square feet per panel or less, to instead allow the Porsche"floating cap"decorative aluminum panel to be 144 square feet. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide. The architectural style is indicative of "Modern International" which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c., whose characteristics include taut plane surfaces, rectilinear forms, with materials of glass and metal. Out of 186 dealerships in America, 166 have this exterior façade design. It has not been changed significantly in over 15 years. Of the remaining (less than 20) most of those is part of another showroom that does not have an exterior presence. Additionally, they use the same design in Europe. The Porsche Group spent extensive time, effort, study and funds to have a prototype architectural design developed for use in construction of the Porsche Dealerships, Showrooms and Museum displays. The proposed Porsche building has been designed based on the standard prototype which includes a "floating cap" architectural feature consisting of an aluminum panel design that includes aluminum panels with an area of 144 square feet. The LDC requires 120 square feet per panel generally 10' x 12'. We are requesting use of 144 square feet per panel generally 12' x 12' which from the street(from observing other Porsche Facilities)does not appear to be discernible. The panels are a high end, high quality aluminum material that carries forward the Porsche principles of innovation, design, functionality, and performance. The panels are a standard clip system with reveals at 3/4" deep by %2" wide. The "floating cap" aluminum panels are a main architectural feature of the building and are visible on all four (4) facades creating a unified appearance for the building. Pictures of an existing Porsche building have been included with this deviation package which illustrates the"floating cap"and 144 square foot panels. As an enhancement the "floating cap" has been designed with a reduced panel along the top of the façade that provides a trim feature to create an appearance of a cornice along the roofline (shown below). Also the pedestrian sidewalk in front of the building will have a decorative pavers/ stamped concrete and decorative planters (shown below) that complement the architectural style of the building. Lastly the south landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the modern architectural style of the building. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 4 of 21 June 23,2016 sestapat ata,stow, wawa The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this deviation request. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The request is due to "corporate brand' and the desire to create a particular architectural image. The applicant proposes on using decorative aluminum panels spaced 144 square feet per panel as opposed to the LDC required 120 square feet per panel. Staff can support this requested deviation and agrees with the applicant's statement that from the street, the proposed panels will not appear to be discernible from what the LDC already requires. Based on this, staff sees this deviation as an equivalent alternative which is allowed by code. Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved and can support this deviation. Deviation 2: LDC 4.02.16.D.8.c.ii. Allow Terrace Avenue Façade to have less than 25% glazing. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.D.8.c.ii., that is from the GTMUD-MXD. which requires that secondary street frontages provide 25% glazing of the secondary street facade, to instead allow 17% glazing on the secondary street façade facing Terrace Boulevard to the North. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: The proposed Porsche dealership property has frontage on both Davis Boulevard to the south and Terrace Boulevard to the north. An industry standard is to orientate the sales center and vehicle displays towards a major vehicle right-of-way which in this case is Davis Boulevard to the south. In choosing this orientation the back of the building, which consists of the vehicle service/maintenance area, is orientated towards Terrace Avenue to the north. Due to the functionality of the vehicle service/maintenance area, Porsche corporate typically does not place windows on this façade. In an effort to meet this requirement windows have been added to this façade which result in 170/0 glazing. The north facade has limited wall space available to accomplish the glazing while still providing the structural shear walls on this site which is located in a hurricane zone. As shown below the North façade area is 4,685 square feet. The applicant is proposing 811 square feet of glazing, achieved through the use of glass roll up doors and windows resulting in 17% glazing. This façade includes 739 square feet of the architectural "floating cap" feature and 562 square feet for the stairwell resulting in 1,301 square feet that cannot easily support windows without losing the DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 5 of 21 June 23,2016 integrity of the design and functionality. By reducing the 4,685 square foot façade by 1,301 square feet the modified façade area is 1384 square feet. Based on this modified façade area of 3.384 square feet the proposed 811 square feet of glazing results in 24%glazing. Fl ; , yew `s w..«..--tet NO P Oeratlon Alla 4 Facain � w.•s FLOA I INC'CAP TOTAL FACADE STAIRWELL AREA=739 SE AREA=4.685 SF AREA=562 SF Furthermore the zoning on the north and south sides of Terrace Avenue in the location of the Porsche property is C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial designation. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The request is due to "corporate brand" and "industry standard- and the desire to create a particular architectural image. The LDC normally requires 30 percent glazing on primary facades. Because this property is within the GTMUD-MXD, 25 percent glazing is only required. The petitioner's rationale is that "due to the functionality of the vehicle service/maintenance area. Porsche corporate typically does not place windows on this facade. - Although this façade is for Porsche's service area, this area will still be seen from Terrace Avenue, southbound Airport Pulling Road, and the Salvation Army sports complex. LCD Section 10.02.03 F. 3.a. clearly states `Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly stated. The applicant has not offered any mitigation for this deviation. The applicant does not intend to meet current standards to the maximum extent possible consistent with the purpose and intent of this section of the LDC nor provide any equivalent alternative. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. Deviation 3 LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i. Roof Line changes The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i which requires that buildings larger than 5.000 square foot gross building area provide a minimum of two roof-edge or parapet line changes. at least one such changes shall be provided on primary façade, and additional roof-edge or parapet line changes must be provided for every 100 linear feet of the facade length, to instead allow a 190 linear foot roof line with no parapet line changes along the south façade facing Davis Boulevard. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 6 of 21 June 23,2016 Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide. The architectural style is indicative of "Modern International" which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c., whose characteristics include taut plane surfaces and rectilinear forms. In keeping with this style Porsche's standard building has a '`floating cap" architectural feature with an uninterrupted roofline that is located along the entire south facade facing Davis Boulevard with the exception of a 15-foot wide slot at the front entry that splits the "floating cap" into two curves. The applicant is requesting the south facade to have a 190 linear foot continuous roofline which exceeds the code requirement of providing a roof line change every 100 linear feet. The "floating cap" architectural feature is a continuous curve that wraps around the southern portion of the east side of the building near the Service Drive and New Vehicle Delivery area. It also wraps the south portion of the west side of the building near the Showroom. Due to the "floating cap" architectural feature there is no change in parapet height along the south facade facing Davis Boulevard providing a clean roof line. As previously mentioned the "floating cap" is a curved feature. The curve provides the appearance of movement along the south facade as opposed to a flat surface. Also the pedestrian sidewalk in front of the building will have a decorative pavers/ stamped concrete that complement the architectural style of the building. Lastly the south landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the "Modern International"architectural style of the building. , 4C*747- "fit t R 1-U 11 13s'.' The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. DR-P120150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 7 of 21 June 23,2016 Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant has not offered any viable equivalent to code and that the applicant intends on only offering "corporate brand" as a rationale for the deviation requested. In the areas that the applicant intends on providing a roof line change, the applicant proposes a two (2) foot roof line change instead of the LDC minimum three (3) feet. LCD Section 10.02.03 F. 3.a. clearly states "Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly stated." The applicant does not intend to meet current standards to the maximum extent possible consistent with the purpose and intent of this section of the LDC nor provide any equivalent alternative. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. Deviation 4: LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i. Use of Color above Level 8 Saturation Exceeding Allowable Percentages. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i which states the use of colors or materials above level 8 saturation is limited to no more than 10%of a façade,to instead allow colors above a level 8 saturation of 66% of the north façade facing Terrace Avenue, 32% of the east façade facing the Combs commercial property, and 64% of the west façade that facing the proposed 2-story parking garage. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide. The colors and materials used on their buildings are unique to Porsche and helps identify their brand and carry forward the Porsche principles of innovation, design, functionality, and performance. The applicant is proposing three (3) materials that are above Level 8 Saturation. One (1) material is a black corrugated metal material, one (1) material is a Dark Grey Exterior Insulation Finishing System EIFS material, and one (1) material is a black coiling overhead door. On both the north and east facades the black corrugated metal will act as a neutral backdrop to allow the silver panels on the Showroom to be the prominent design feature. This is durable material, which is desirable for a building with vehicles driving close to the building throughout the day. The applicant is also proposing a dark grey exterior insulation finishing system (EIFS) on the west façade that complements both the black metal and silver panels of the building. On the north façade facing Terrace Avenue the applicant is proposing 66% of the total façade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. Of the 66%, 54%is the black corrugated metal siding and 12% is the Dark Grey EIFS. The north façade includes fully glazed high-speed overhead doors (shown below) that further complement the design aesthetic of the building. As previously mentioned the zoning on the north and south sides of Terrace Avenue are C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial designation. As the applicant is proposes to install Royal Palms on both side of the access driveways along Terrace Avenue. These Royal Palms will provide emphasis at the accesses and will also provide a cohesive landscape plan that matches the Royal Palms proposed along the entire Davis Boulevard buffer. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 8 of 21 June 23,2016 mow On the east facade the applicant is proposing 32% of the total façade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. The entire 32% is the black corrugated metal material. The east facade includes a fully glazed high-speed overhead door that further complements the design aesthetic of the building. This facade proposes 30% glazing in addition to the four (4) required building design treatments per 5.05.08.C.5.b. Lastly this facade faces the Combs oil facility to the east zoned C-5 which is the most intense commercial designation. On the west facade the applicant is proposing 64% of the total facade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. Of the 64%, 50% is the Dark Grey E1FS and 14% is the black coiling overhead doors for the vehicle detail bays. The west facade is not visible from the street or from the adjacent C-5 zoned commercial property and blocked from view with the 2-story parking garage located on the western portion of the property. Lastly the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area code Section 4.02.16.D.3.f allows for deviations from the exterior building color subject to the following criteria: i. The deviation request is consistent with LDC Section 5.06.00 regarding sign regulations and standards. ii. The deviation request consists of no more than 3 colors. iii. The deviation request may not be for a color which is below lightness level 3 on the Collier County Architectural Color Charts. The applicant is consistent with the above referenced criteria as explained below: i. The deviation for exterior building color is not related to signs. ii. The deviation is for three (3)colors. iii. The colors requested in the deviation are not below lightness level 3 on the Collier County Architectural Color Charts. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 9 of 21 June 23,2016 Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant is proposing to use two (2) colors above a saturation of level 8 in dark grey and black. As opposed to the minimum 10 percent of the facade, which the LDC allows for these colors, the applicant is proposing, in some areas, over 60% of the color on the primary facade. The applicant has used "brand" and "corporate appearance" as justification for their deviation. Staff does not recognize "brand"" or "corporate appearance" as a justification nor does the LDC. Staff can only address how code reads and the intent. LCD Section 10.02.03 F. 3.a. clearly states "Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly stated.- If the applicant would offer, for example, more glazing or landscaping above code as a means of justifying a deviation, staff could give consideration. The applicant does not intend to meet current standards to the maximum extent possible consistent with the purpose and intent of this section of the LDC nor provide any equivalent alternative. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. Deviation 5: LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.i. Use of Metal Panels Exceeding Allowable Percentage. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.i. which limits corrugated or metal panels to no more than 33% of the facade area. to instead allow 68% on the south facade facing Davis Boulevard. 69%on the east façade, 70%on the north facade facing Terrace Avenue, and 37%on the west façade. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide. As previously mentioned the architectural style is indicative of "Modern International" which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c.. whose characteristic materials for construction are "glass and steel, in combination with usually less visible reinforced concrete"" per Encyclopedia Britannica. There are three (3) metal materials proposed on the building facades" one (1) material is a silver metallic metal panel on the "floating cap- (illustrated below for material reference only), one (1) material is a black corrugated metal siding (shown below), and one (1) material is a painted black coiling material used for their overhead detail bay doors(shown below). 7-4 DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 10 of 21 June 23,2016 ray. �N --r , .. *; -- gar V The silver metallic metal panels are used in the `floating cap" architectural feature that wraps the building and is visible from all four(4) facades. This material is a high-end polished silver and is non-reflective. The black corrugated metal siding is located on the north and east facades and provides a neutral backdrop to allow the "floating cap- to be the prominent design feature on the building. The black corrugated metal is a durable material with horizontal lines that follow the architectural style. The black coiling metal overhead doors are a high quality material and finish for the detail bay service doors. The applicant is proposing 68% of the silver metallic metal panel in the "floating cap" on the south façade facing Davis Boulevard. As previously described Porsche's recognition worldwide is essential to their brand. The "floating cap" is Porsche's unique architectural feature on their buildings and is the prominent feature on the south façade. The applicant is proposing decorative paver/ stamped concrete for the pedestrian sidewalk adjacent to the building along the south façade along with decorative landscape planters. Lastly the south landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the modern architectural style of the building. The applicant is proposing a total of 69% of metal on the east façade. Of the 69%. 37% is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the "floating cap" and 32% is proposed as the black corrugated metal panels. The East facade faces the adjacent commercial property zoned C- 5. Also the east façade provides 30% glazing in addition to the four (4) required architectural design treatments. The applicant is proposing a total of 70%of metal on the north façade facing Terrace Avenue. Of the 70%. 16% is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the "floating cap" and 54% is proposed as the black corrugated metal panels. Along the Terrace Avenue frontage. Porsche is also proposing a 2-story parking garage with a "green screen" landscape feature along the north facade. The use of the "green screen" will provide visual relief and soften the façade through the use of vertical plant material. The applicant is also proposing 5 additional palm trees along the north façade that will be located in front of a section of the black corrugated metal siding. Also the property on the opposite side of Terrace Avenue is zoned C-5, the most intense commercial zoning in Collier County. DR-P120150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 11 of 21 June 23,2016 Lastly,the applicant is proposing a total of 37%of metal on the west façade. Of the 37%, 23%is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the "floating cap" and 14% is proposed as the black coiling overhead service doors. This façade is shielded from view to the adjacent C-5 commercial zoning due to the location of the 2-story parking garage. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback.No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant has used "brand" and "corporate appearance" as justification for their deviation. Staff does not recognize "brand" or "corporate appearance" as a justification nor does the LDC. Staff can only address how code reads and the intent. LCD Section 10.02.03 F. 3.a. clearly states "Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly stated." If the applicant would offer an equivalent alternative as a means of justifying a deviation, staff could give consideration. This is not the case. The applicant does not intend to meet current standards to the maximum extent possible consistent with the purpose and intent of this section of the LDC nor provide any equivalent alternative. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. Deviation 6: LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii. Allow windows at grade up to 8 feet above grade. The applicant seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii. which states that windows shall be located between 2 and 7 feet above sidewalk grade, to instead allow windows to be located between 0 and 8 feet above sidewalk grade. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: The applicant is proposing windows in the Porsche showroom that are intended to allow full visibility of the Porsche vehicle models being sold in the showroom which is typical for automotive dealerships. The majority of these windows are located on the south façade with some showroom windows wrapping around to the east and west facades. Porsche vehicle models are low to the ground and a 2 foot high knee wall would block most of the visibility of the vehicle.Also the requested 8 foot height is proportional to the `floating cap"metal panels located above the windows. A per the newly revised Florida Building Code,habitable buildings located within a FEMA Zone AE, which is the current flood zone for the property, are required to have a finished floor of Base Finish Floor elevation plus 1-foot. Therefore the finished floor elevation for the proposed Porsche Building is 8.0 Ft-NAVD which is approximately 4-feet above the existing Davis Boulevard travel lanes. In order for the vehicles on display to be visible it is necessary that the display windows be placed at the same grade as the sidewalk that is adjacent to the building. The existing building currently located on the property has windows located at grade; please reference the enclosed existing site photos. There are no negative impacts associated with this request. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 12 of 21 June 23,2016 II!EXISTING BUILDING-WITH - WINDOWS AT GRADE I to ID Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant is asking for a deviation from the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Overlay District glazing requirements that would normally be allowed in 5.05.08 of the LDC architectural standards. Based on staffs review, the intent of this LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii was for windows abutting a public sidewalk, not a private sidewalk. The proposal by the applicant is to install large windows next to their proposed private sidewalk. Based on staffs research and understanding, staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. No alternative design or mitigation is required. For these reasons, staff can support this deviation. Deviation 7: LDC Section 5.05.08.D.8.e. Parking Structure Open Area The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.D.8.e. which states that for Parking Structures, the façade area within 42 inches above each floor/deck shall not be open more than 50 percent. except at openings for vehicle or pedestrian access, to instead allow the south facade of the parking structure facing Davis Boulevard to have a cable railing that will be open for 100 percent of the façade length. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 13 of 21 June 23, 2016 Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: As previously described, the proposed Porsche dealership property has frontage on Davis Boulevard to the south. It is the industry standard to orientate the sales center and vehicle displays towards a major vehicle right-of-way. The applicant wishes to utilize the second floor of the parking structure that faces Davis Boulevard, which is the top floor, to display vehicles. The other parking structure facades provide a concrete guardrail that blocks the view of the vehicles from the ground floor. The zoning on the north and south side of Davis Boulevard adjacent to Porsche property is C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial zoning. Landscape islands have been added to the ground surface parking lot directly adjacent to the parking garage foundation in order to provide vegetation adjacent to the parking garage. Additionally the middle section of the parking garage will also include a vertical green screen as shown below that will help soften the facade. These landscape islands are not required since the ground surface parking lot is completely designated for display vehicles that are for sale. The addition of the landscape islands are included to help soften the appearance of the parking garage and offsite the request to have 100%of the second story open. There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this request. 00 0 0 114 Staff Analysis and Recommendation The applicant wishes to utilize the second floor of the parking - -- — structure that faces Davis Boulevard, which is the top floor, to display vehicles. The other parking structure facades provide a concrete guardrail that blocks the view of the vehicles from the ground floor. Staff can only address how code reads and the intent. LDC Section 10.02.03 F. 3.a. clearly states "Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly stated." If the applicant would offer, for example, more landscaping above code as a means of justifying a deviation, staff could give consideration. The applicant does not intend to meet current standards to the maximum extent possible consistent with the purpose and intent of this section of the LDC nor provide any equivalent alternative. The applicant has stated in their justification that "the middle section of the parking garage will also include a vertical green screen as shown below that will help soften the facade. These landscape islands are not required since the ground surface parking lot is completely designated for display vehicles that are for sale." This statement is incorrect. The landscaping the applicant is referring to is LDC required plant material for foundation and Vehicle Use requirements. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 14 of 21 June 23,2016 Deviation 8: LDC Section 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b.1 Right-of-Way Buffer along Terrace Avenue The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b.1 which states that the landscape buffer along road rights-of-way shall be a minimum 10-foot wide Type D Buffer, to instead allow a minimum of a 6.5-foot wide Type D Buffer for 76 linear feet along Terrace Avenue. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: The required building setback along Terrace Avenue is 6.5-feet and in order to eliminate the third driveway connection from the property to Terrace Avenue the internal building areas were modified so that the vehicle service area entrance is on the Porsche property. The internal building changes necessitated a building expansion to the north setback line. The loss of the 3.5` of buffer over the 76 linear feet results in 266 square feet of buffer area. This area has been compensated for further to the west in the contiguous expanded buffer area as shown below. Five small palms are proposed in this area that is in addition to the code required landscape. Furthermore Royal Palms are proposed on either side of the two (2) access driveways off Terrace Avenue. The Royal Palms along Terrace will match the Royal Palms proposed all along Davis Boulevard providing a cohesive appearance from both rights-of-way. There is no reduction in the required plantings along this buffer as a result of this request. -- - ----- _ _ BtJI I)Ji1G OYERLAPPL� - -- INTO BUFFER ROYAL PALMS 0 lif ,TERRACE AVE Ojrj AT ENTRANCE Alga EZII p�E� _- - _ �V�ice- � �© © ml�ritrdfit .VA. ifir" � � °-. 4 ' �1m iii 1.1iyil ..--471,,4, „,7„, , „ ,,,E,1,,,,,,. ..", ..oaco.ho. _4 �, _. ..4 . f Q: 10 "�' aulhr CompurMon Anlr ' ,, ' '' 9l . — eIllit:0 . 0 4,: / r b _572 @ Perimeter Rani +� — M—I+ l `.�7ftVW �Oa��J/j�� 2 I' � 370 d 9uidnp Pir nN1�r P{�rdYq % 410 � N 1 p l . .....' ,,oseitrip Ii COMPENSATION ;ADDITIONAL '/:-,15 AREA PALMS L s rm ROYAL PALMS AT ENTRANCE There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this request. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The required minimums for building setbacks along Terrace Avenue are 6.5 feet according to the Gateway Triangle Overlay. The intent of the building setback was for the purposes of abutting a public sidewalk or plaza. A 20+Type D buffer currently exists along Terrace Avenue exceeding code. The applicant is asking to create a currently conforming buffer into a non-conforming landscape buffer. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 15 of 21 June 23,2016 10.02 F.1. states: Purpose. A site plan with deviations shall provide a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations,excluding height, architectural deviations,and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping,parking,and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings,structures or site features nonconforming. The intent of 10.02.03. F., Site Plan with Deviations, was to allow for site features that were existing nonconforming elements of the code, to be possibly allowed through justification. The applicant is asking to allow existing features (buffer), in conformance with code, to be nonconforming. Although the applicant has offered some compensating features for the request (additional plant material), the applicant has not met the purpose. For these reasons, staff cannot support this deviation. Deviation 9: LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a. Use of Royal Palms as Canopy Trees for 100% Davis buffer. The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.06.05.D.2.a. which states that Roystonea (aka Royal Palms) shall count one palm for one canopy tree and that palms may be substituted for up to 30-percent of required canopy trees with the exception that no more than 30-percent of canopy trees may be substituted by palms within each individual Type `D' road right-of-way landscape buffer, to instead allow Royal Palms as a substitution for 100% of the required canopy trees within the Davis Boulevard Type `D' road right-of-way buffer. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification in the application narrative for this deviation: The Porsche development is required to provide a 10-foot wide Type `D' landscape buffer along Davis Boulevard with trees spaced no more than 30-feet on-center per LDC Section 4.06.05.C.4.a. According to this section of code,the 304 linear feet of Davis Boulevard frontage requires 10 canopy trees. In addition, the Gateway Triangle Redevelopment overlay code requires "Parking Lot landscaping" to provide one tree or palm spaced 25-feet on-center as per Section 4.02.16.E.3.c.i. According to the overlay code for the "Parking Lot Landscaping," the 304 linear feet of Davis frontage requires 13 trees or palms. The applicant is requesting a deviation from section 4.06.05.D.2.a. to allow the use of 100% Royal Palms, 13 total, in the Davis Boulevard road right-of-way landscape buffer. The Royal Palms will be installed with an overall height of 24' which is more than the code required 10' of clear trunk at the time of planting. The taller Royal Palms are an enhancement to the development that will provide a presence along Davis Boulevard. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 16 of 21 June 23,2016 _ _ .w 1 te'l�ie`�'t..,ei - -..." _� ., ` `.1.! ' __ �S * ^1y E�z ;i\V` �' i t .. • �+w 5 4,..:' �'I' ‘‘s � \tir r. q .Van ■ �. alr:f d h Thr \ EA — — — 1' :IS mIRz� ,-,..41r f o �, ' I / 14. mum I im ROI AI PALMA FA fi aft IF \ 014 . GNI AIRF OF DRI%1 M'AN \ �� Y ,# Rte.. \ I ,� \'. .. Li. ii ©: \ .7 v, sosovaboor • "i tea rM t Ri 01.14.144 NEES 1 �, .' ..te....sawMouar.,. ° ::}},,,,,. Atp)a,,DAS'Ia „IF„ • _ ,wut7 atFFFR , i i'0. ® 0. ..+e.Y3....eMa. r,e w.., l : `� ®1V.. _ ,k..,.4 f1fN,. „ x arm%,oa , *73F �` / c, n CM I { ._r.. v , ter fir, ,.�® ! '®I� ro,� e �...1 11 I r 1[7 I A 01w.rw dwa►... ••gal _.. 1 `rw..wr ~ I ao.rw E o . OIC — i v .: n.w./' { w..w R710 �i R7u.1O ? I p r _ r a I Iowa /.l\.-v," Are.ti.,2.:/, 7M►s,e r,;'-F ',,,.r,I,1�t"`+;a aam:.irk a .+ �I t.li 1 1 The existing property has four (4) quality Royal Palms at the entrance that the applicant would like to utilize within the proposed Porsche project. In an effort to utilize these existing Royal Palms and provide a landscape plan that complemented the '`Modern International" architecture style of the building. Royal Palms are being requested along the entire Davis Boulevard frontage and an additional four(4) Royal Palms are proposed at the two (2) access connections to Terrace Avenue to the North. The use of the Royal Palms along both street frontages provides a cohesive appearance for the site. There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this request. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request if approved because the applicant is using existing plant material (Royal Palms) on site and proposing larger Royal Palms than code requires (14' high trees required, 24' high trees proposed). In this case.the applicant has offered "project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviation." For these reasons, staff can support the requested deviation. ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the requested deviation against the established criteria for Site Plans with Deviations under LDC Section 10.02.03.F.7,and provide the below analysis. 1. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. DR-P120150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 17 of 21 June 23,2016 Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report. The proposed deviations will not change the permitted land uses and densities within the development. 2. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Staff is of the opinion that the project as proposed will remain consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the project to be compatible with neighborhood development. Staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. The petition can also be deemed consistent with the CCME and the Transportation Element. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP because uses are not changing with this amendment. 3. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. The proposed deviations recommended by staff will have a beneficial effect. It is staff opinion that the proposed development,while not fully meeting current LDC requirements, does propose building-site-and landscape improvements that exceed the requirements upon which the site was originally developed. The proposed improvements will have both a visual and economic beneficial effect for the surrounding neighborhood and unincorporated Collier County for this currently vacant development. 4. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose The proposed deviations recommended by staff will not change the current land area within the development and are adequate to serve the intended purpose. 5. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed deviations recommended by staff meet the purpose and intent of the LDC regulations as noted above for the proposed redevelopment. The additional architectural, site and landscape improvements proposed are appropriate and will be of benefit to the community. 6. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 18 of 21 June 23,2016 Staff has reviewed the information provided by the applicant and is of the opinion that the project will exceed the standards required of the development when originally permitted and will contain a better visual character than the existing structure currently. 7. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. At time of the Site Improvement Plan and Building Permit processing the proposed development improvements are subject to applicable maintenance requirements as well as standard confirmation and authorization of common ownership(s). 8. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. Staff finds that the petitioner's deviations recommended by staff are delineated and represent the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project as outlined and stated by the agents in the application. 9. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. The applicant is proposing to provide alternative architectural and landscape enhancements on some of the deviations that will serve as a benefit to the surrounding area and Collier County. However, there are six (6) deviations that are not supported by staff because an equivalent or alternative has not been proposed. Although the applicants proposed project seems to be an improvement over existing, staff feels it can only limit its recommendation to alternatives proposed and the not the project itself. 10. Approval of the deviation(s)will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report. Further, based on the information provided in the application the proposed deviations recommended by staff, should not adversely affect adjacent properties. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office reviewed the staff report for this petition on June 13, 2016. DR-P1201 50002617-Porsche of Naples Page 19 of 21 June 23,2016 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve the following deviations of Porsche of Naples, Site Plan with Deviations,DR-PL20150002617. Deviation 1 is approved. The applicant has proposed an equivalent alternative. Deviation 2 is denied.A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was not proposed. Deviation 3 is denied. A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was not proposed. Deviation 4 is denied. A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was not proposed. Deviation 5 is denied. A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was not proposed. Deviation 6 is approved. The deviation meets the intent of code language. Deviation 7 is denied. A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was not proposed. Deviation 8 is denied.The deviation is asking for a current conforming buffer to be non- conforming. Deviation 9 is approved. A project enhancement to offset or minimize the deviation was proposed. Approval of this petition shall be subject to the completion of the Site Improvement Plan Amendment(SIP)currently under review and all associated Building Permits as applicable. Attachments: A. Deviation Exhibit-Map with Deviations B. Supporting Documents by Applicant DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 20 of 21 June 23,2016 PREPARED BY: Gil() I 6., DANIEL J• I:7SMITH,AICP, 'RINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING SERVICES SECTION -• REVIEWED BY: 6 /316 RAY BF ,LOWS,MANAGER DATE ZONING SERVICES SECTION G -I3- 1(0 MIKE BOSI,AICP,DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION DR-PI20150002617-Porsche of Naples Page 21 of 21 June 23,2016 • I .1l I I 'i I I I II l I I I I I _ 1 I tom_ I _ _I r -_L -- } _ I _ L J - I 1 TERRACE AVENUE — 8 _. < (60'WIDE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) o h ',i„i JJ' .`''' ,my_ --'''''4471-,1,44' f3 r C co 'P' ___...u-' r r rx i I,7, O S N —y a: R m x1`` is - ( � I w at ; s� ,1 VD .4,47,,,: ez . ',, 4 r io{ ,:I o ail I I o • :*a .�* •s`i r AWSP• I— i qtr '..,,,,,,..4,4 Z eaceaw I 7 .�ii z vd 3 04I k . �� i I— �€��€ '" - N La —� 3.i't �d' r U C' ,R a ED ‘ w ,, • CYC p M'''i Atlry fm CC a r;� � hr a 4iiz . f� o _ ' u.S 1 �, J i 3'�. ■at ■ 12\ .k..aF-71 . �,A t fc. % 'v$"pnI •n hQ+k p M1111 `:� n tlf //a' 'p� "'" •U � t x1 t $X a -�° Ihas ax* ° 0 z i 4 b rsY iF.,„ r$ 6, c,,,,!. t. 3 k,4 a r1 • .. w l ,:44 � 1 � b s y ,g as l t * 44,;,1*!.. � f i r 7�y1a,',1' ,�` i s - a'' , he r �:44.&41-t--1.--!'"--, A°.: y'y� ",'* 3�' t,> °k( BKF� - -��# c� i N v 9 �a Cyt ° ,�'' �,t ' rx axi`f h` tr k t.. x`1{M``r >`.�> � f. :-eaz.:1:5:,;',:s4jtg,:j4:.ILt.,,my'A fet,,,,, N',1',itil. ,,,i/i'l" eikkg,",WI '' .1"8ie ' ';legJ t z DAVIS BOULEVARD __ -- _ --- '(100'WIDE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) •7 0 a 2, NO 0 w w 3 I _ 1 m 0 25' 50' 0 o SCALE: 1" = 50' D a J.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. PROJECT#: 16015-02 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD,SUITE 102 PORSCHE OF NAPLES FILE DATE: 04-20-2016 ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 N PHONE:(239)405-9148 E RDESIGN BY: KMJ FAX:(z39) 37 SEC. 2,TOWN. 50 5,R. 25 ° GINEEDEVIATIONS EXHIBIT Z WWW.JREVANSEHGINEERING.COM KRISTINA M. JOHNSON P.E. a FL.COA#29226 1"=50' FL. LICENSE #: 73793 Attachment A • Deviation 1:LDC 5.05.08.C.8.b. (Blank wall area greater than 120 sf) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.8.b.which states that control or expansion joints are considered blank wall area unless used as a decorative pattern and spaced at 120 square feet per panel or less,to instead allow the Porsche"floating cap"decorative aluminum panel to be 144 square feet. Deviation 2:LDC 4.02.16.D.8.c.ii. Ba shore Gatewa Trian.le Allow Terrace Avenue fa ade to have less than 25%s lazin The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.118,c,ii.from the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area,which requires that secondary street frontages provide 25%glazing of the secondary street facade,to instead allow 17%glazing of the secondary street facade facing Terrace Boulevard to the North. Deviation 3:LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i. (Roof Line changes) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i which requires that buildings larger than 5,000 square foot gross building area provide a minimum of two roof-edge or parapet line changes,at least one such changes shall be provided on primary facade,and additional roof-edge or parapet line changes must be provided for every 100 linear feet of the facade length,to instead allow one roof line with no parapet line changes along the south facade facing Davis Boulevard. Deviation 4:LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.l. (Use of Color Above Level 8 Saturation exceeding allowable percentages) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i which states the use of colors or materials above level 8 saturation is limited to no more than 10%of a facade,to instead allow colors above a Level 8 saturation of 66%of the north facade facing Terrace Avenue,and 32%of the east facade, and 64%of the west facade. U Deviation 5:LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.ii. (Use of Metal Panels exceeding allowable percentages) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.ii.which limits Corrugated or metal panels to no more than 33%of the facade area,to instead allow 68%on the south facade facing Davis Boulevard,69%on the east facade,70%on the north facade facing Terrace Avenue,and 37%on the west facade. Deviation 6:LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii.- Bayshore Gateway Triangle(Allow windows at grade up to 8 feet above grade) The applicant seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii.which states that windows shall be located between 2 and 7 feet above sidewalk grade,to instead allow windows to be located between 0 and 8 feet above sidewalk grade. Deviation 7:LDC Section 5.05.08.13.8.e.1Parking Structure Oeen Area) z The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.D.8.e.which states that for Parking Structures,the facade area within 42 inches above each floor/deck shall not be open more than 50 percent,except at openings for vehicle or pedestrian access,to instead allow the south facade of the parking structure facing Davis Boulevard to have a cable railing that will be open for 100 percent of the facade length. I 3 Deviation 8:LDC Section 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b).1). (Right-of-Way Buffer along Terrace Avenue) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b).1).which states that the landscape buffer along road rights-of-way shall be a minimum 0 I U 10-foot wide Type D Buffer,to instead allow a minimum of a 6.5-foot wide Type D Buffer for 76 linear feet along Terrace Avenue. Deviation 9:LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a. (Use of Royal Palms as Canopy Trees for 100%Davis buffer) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.06.05.D.2.a.which states that Roystonea(aka Royal Palms)shall count one palm for one canopy tree and that palms may be substituted for up to 30-percent of required canopy trees with the exception that no more than 30-percent of canopy trees may be substituted by palms within each individual Type"D"road right of way landscape buffer,to instead allow Royal Palms as a substitution for 100%of the required canopy trees within the Davis Boulevard Type"D"road right of way buffer. O N U U N 5 U LU W O 0 0 o J.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. PROJECT#: 16015-02 7 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD,SUITE 102 PORSCHE OF NAPLES FILE DATE: 04-20-2016 ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 PHONE:(239)405-9148 DESIGN 8Y: KMJ FAX:(239)288-2537 SEC. 2,TOWN. 50 S,R. 25 E wWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.CONI DEVIATIONS EXHIBIT KRSTINA M. JOHNSON P,E. d FL COA U 29226 SCALE: N/A FL. LICENSE is 73793 d J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING PORSCHE OF NAPLES- DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS Dated: 4-20-2016 Deviation 1: LDC 5.05.08.C.8.b.(Blank Wall Area Greater Than 120 Sauare Feet) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.8.b.which states that control or expansion joints are considered blank wall area unless used as a decorative pattern and spaced at 120 square feet per panel or less, to instead allow the Porsche"floating cap"decorative aluminum panel to be 144 square feet. Justification 1: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide.The architectural style is indicative of"Modern International"which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c., whose characteristics include taut plane surfaces, rectilinear forms, with materials of glass and metal. Out of 186 dealerships in America. 166 have this exterior facade design. It has not been changed significantly in over 15 years. Of the remaining(less than 20)most of those are part of another showroom that does not have an exterior presence. Additionally, they use the same design in Europe. The Porsche Group spent extensive time, effort, study and funds to have a prototype architectural design developed for use in construction of the Porsche Dealerships,Showrooms and Museum displays. The proposed Porsche building has been designed based on the standard prototype which includes a"floating cap" architectural feature consisting of an aluminum panel design that includes aluminum panels with an area of 144 square feet. The LDC requires 120 square feet per panel generally 10' x 12'. We are requesting use of 144 square feet per panel generally 12' x 12' which from the street(from observing other Porsche Facilities) does not appear to be discernable.The panels are a high end, high quality aluminum material that carries forward the Porsche principles of innovation, design, functionality, and performance. The panels are a standard clip system with reveals at'/."deep by 'A"wide.The"floating cap" aluminum panels are a main architectural feature of the building and are visible on all four(4) facades creating a unified appearance for the building. Pictures of an existing Porsche building have been included with this deviation package which illustrates the"floating cap"and 144 square foot panels. As an enhancement the "floating cap" has been designed with a reduced panel along the top of the facade that provides a trim feature to create an appearance of a cornice along the roofline (shown below). Also the pedestrian sidewalk in front of the building will have a decorative pavers/ stamped concrete and decorative planters (shown below)that complement the architectural style of the building. Lastly the south landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the modern architectural style of the building. v, s Low • • The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this deviation request. April 20,2016 Page 2 0 11 JR EVANS ENGINEERING Deviation 2: LDC 4.02.16.D.8.c.ii. (Allow Terrace Avenue Facade to have less than 25%glazing] The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4,02.16.D.8.c.ii,, that is from the Gateway Bayshore Triangle Redevelopment Area, which requires that secondary street frontages provide 25%glazing of the secondary street facade, to instead allow 17%glazing on the secondary street facade facing Terrace Boulevard to the North. Justification 2: The proposed Porsche dealership property has frontage on both Davis Boulevard to the south and Terrace Boulevard to the north.. An industry standard is to orientate the sales center and vehicle displays towards a major vehicle right-of-way which in this case is Davis Boulevard to the south. In choosing this orientation the back of the building which consists of the vehicle service/maintenance area, is orientated towards Terrace Avenue to the north. Due to the functionality of the vehicle service/maintenance area, Porsche corporate typically does not place windows on this facade. In an effort to meet this requirement windows have been added to this facade which result in 17% glazing. The north facade has limited wall space available to accomplish the glazing while still providing the structural shear walls on this site which is located in a hurricane zone. As shown below the North facade area is 4,685 square feet. The applicant is proposing 811 square feet of glazing, achieved through the use of glass roll up doors and windows resulting in 17% glazing. This facade includes 739 square feet of the architectural "floating cap" feature and 562 square feet for the stairwell resulting in 1.301 square feet that cannot easily support windows without losing the integrity of the design and functionality. By reducing the 4,685 square foot facade by 1,301 square feet the modified facade area is 3,384 square feet. Based on this modified facade area of 3,384 square feet the proposed 811 square feet of glazing results in 24%glazing. • -� � ti e (Rmi)Facade) FLOATING CAP TOTAL FACADE STAIRWELL AREA=719 SF AREA=4.6$5 St AREA=562 SF Furthermore the zoning on the north and south sides of Terrace Avenue in the location of the Porsche property is C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial designation. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. 110 April 20,2016 R. EVAN$ �-' 1EER • • =�� nage3ofi� Deviation 3: LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i. (Roof Line changes) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i which requires that buildings larger than 5,000 square foot gross building area provide a minimum of two roof-edge or parapet line changes, at least one such changes shall be provided on primary facade, and additional roof-edge or parapet line changes must be provided for every 100 linear feet of the facade length, to instead allow a 190 linear foot roof line with no parapet line changes along the south facade facing Davis Boulevard. Justification 3: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide.The architectural style is indicative of"Modern International"which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c., whose characteristics include taut plane surfaces and rectilinear forms. In keeping with this style Porsche's standard building has a"floating cap" architectural feature with an uninterrupted roofline that is located along the entire south facade facing Davis Boulevard with the exception of a 15-foot wide slot at the front entry that splits the"floating cap" into two curves.The applicant is requesting the south facade to have a 190 linear foot continuous roofline which exceeds the code requirement of providing a roof line change every 100 linear feet. The"floating cap"architectural feature is a continuous curve that wraps around the southern portion of the east side of the building near the Service Drive and New Vehicle Delivery area. It also wraps the south portion of the west side of the building near the Showroom. Due to the "floating cap" architectural feature there is no change in parapet height along the south facade facing Davis Boulevard providing a clean roof line. As previously mentioned the "floating cap" is a curved feature. The curve provides the appearance of movement along the south facade as opposed to a flat surface. Also the pedestrian sidewalk in front of the building will have a decorative pavers/ stamped concrete that complement the architectural style of the building. Lastly the south • landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the "Modem International"architectural style of the building. 7,7 ,; WOMPOICHE , I1t (URVU M.oAIINt. Al,( The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request, 111 .i.� April 20,2016 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Page 4 of 11 • Deviation 4: LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i.(Use of Color Above Level 8 Saturation Exceeding Allowable Percentages) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.13.b.i which states the use of colors or materials above level 8 saturation is limited to no more than 10%of a façade,to instead allow colors above a level 8 saturation of 66%of the north facade facing Terrace Avenue,32%of the east facade facing the Combs commercial property, and 64%of the west façade that facing the proposed 2-story parking garage. Justification 4: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide. The colors and materials used on their buildings are unique to Porsche and helps identify their brand and carry forward the Porsche principles of innovation,design,functionality,and performance.The applicant is proposing three (3) materials that are above Level 8 Saturation. One (1) material is a black corrugated metal material,one(1) material is a Dark Grey Exterior Insulation Finishing System EIFS material, and one(1) material is a black coiling overhead door. On both the north and east facades the black corrugated metal will act as a neutral backdrop to allow the silver panels on the Showroom to be the prominent design feature. This is durable material, which is desirable for a building with vehicles driving close to the building throughout the day. The applicant is also proposing a dark grey exterior insulation finishing system(EIFS)on the west façade that complements both the black metal and silver panels of the building. On the north facade facing Terrace Avenue the applicant is proposing 66%of the total façade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. Of the 66%, 54%is the black corrugated metal siding and 12%is the Dark Grey EIFS.The north façade includes fully glazed high-speed overhead doors(shown below)that further complement the design aesthetic of the building. As previously mentioned the zoning on the north and south sides of Terrace Avenue are C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial designation.As the applicant is proposes to install Royal Palms on both side of • the access driveways along Terrace Avenue. These Royal Palms will provide emphasis at the accesses and will also provide a cohesive landscape plan that matches the Royal Palms proposed along the entire Davis Boulevard buffer. � - On the east facade the applicant is proposing 32%of the total façade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. The entire 32%is the black corrugated metal material. The east façade includes a fully glazed high-speed overhead door that further complements the design aesthetic of the building. This façade proposes 30%glazing in addition to the four(4) required building design treatments per 5.05.08.C.5.b. Lastly this façade faces the Combs oil facility to the east zoned C-5 which is the most intense commercial designation. On the west façade the applicant is proposing 64%of the total façade area above a color Level 8 Saturation. Of the 64%, 50%is the Dark Grey EIFS and 14%is the black coiling overhead doors for the vehicle detail bays. The west façade is not visible from the street or from the adjacent C-5 zoned commercial property and blocked from view with • the 2-story parking garage located on the western portion of the property. Lastly the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area code Section 4.02.16.D.3.f allows for deviations from the exterior building color subject to the following criteria: April 20,2016 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Page 5 of 11 • The deviation request is consistent with LDC Section 5.06.00 regarding sign regulations and standards. ii. The deviation request consists of no more than 3 colors. iii. The deviation request may not be for a color which is below lightness level 3 on the Collier County Architectural Color Charts. The applicant is consistent with the above referenced criteria as explained below: The deviation for exterior building color is not related to signs. ii. The deviation is for three(3)colors. iii. The colors requested in the deviation are not below lightness level 3 on the Collier County Architectural Color Charts. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. • 11111 aApril 20,2016 EVANS ENGINEERING Page 6of11 • Deviation 5: LDC 5.05.08.C.13.c.i.(Use of Metal Panels Exceeding Allowable Percentage) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05,08.C.13.c.i. which limits Corrugated or metal panels to no more than 33% of the facade area, to instead allow 68%on the south facade facing Davis Boulevard, 69%on the east facade, 70% on the north facade facing Terrace Avenue,and 37%on the west façade. Justification 5: Porsche is a corporate brand and it is their desire to have a standard corporate appearance at their retail dealership locations worldwide.As previously mentioned the architectural style is indicative of"Modern International"which is an acceptable architectural style per LDC 5.05.08.A.2.c.. whose characteristic materials for construction are"glass and steel, in combination with usually less visible reinforced concrete" per Encyclopedia Britannica. There are three (3) metal materials proposed on the building facades, one (1) material is a silver metallic metal panel on the "floating cap"(illustrated below for material reference only),one(1)material is a black corrugated metal siding (shown below), and one(1)material is a painted black coiling material used for their overhead detail bay doors(shown below). 44. 41. • t - ' t e „. !ma CIPINIII=1414111111 . 1411110"1‘ The silver metallic metal panels are used in the "floating cap” architectural feature that wraps the building and is visible from all four(4)facades.This material is a high-end polished silver and is non-reflective.The black corrugated metal siding is located on the north and east facades and provides a neutral backdrop to allow the"floating cap"to be • the prominent design feature on the building. The black corrugated metal is a durable material with horizontal lines that follow the architectural style.The black coiling metal overhead doors are a high quality material and finish for the detail bay service doors. April 20,2016 Page 7 of 11 • J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING The applicant is proposing 68% of the silver metallic metal panel in the "floating cap" on the south facade facing Davis Boulevard. As previously described Porsche's recognition worldwide is essential to their brand. The "floating cap" is Porsche's unique architectural feature on their buildings and is the prominent feature on the south facade. The applicant is proposing decorative paver/stamped concrete for the pedestrian sidewalk adjacent to the building along the south facade along with decorative landscape planters. Lastly the south landscape buffer along Davis will have Royal Palms in lieu of canopy trees that will also complement the modern architectural style of the building. The applicant is proposing a total of 69% of metal on the east facade. Of the 69%, 37% is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the"floating cap"and 32%is proposed as the black corrugated metal panels.The East facade faces the adjacent commercial property zoned C-5. Also the east facade provides 30%glazing in addition to the four (4)required architectural design treatments. The applicant is proposing a total of 70%of metal on the north facade facing Terrace Avenue. Of the 70%, 16%is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the"floating cap" and 54%is proposed as the black corrugated metal panels.Along the Terrace Avenue frontage, Porsche is also proposing a 2-story parking garage with a"green screen" landscape feature along the north facade. The use of the "green screen" will provide visual relief and soften the facade through the use of vertical plant material. The applicant is also proposing 5 additional palm trees along the north facade that will be located in front of a section of the black corrugated metal siding. Also the property on the opposite side of Terrace Avenue is zoned C-5,the most intense commercial zoning in Collier County. Lastly, the applicant is proposing a total of 37%of metal on the west facade. Of the 37%, 23% is proposed as the silver metallic metal panel in the"floating cap"and 14%is proposed as the black coiling overhead service doors.This facade is shielded from view to the adjacent C-5 commercial zoning due to the location of the 2-story parking garage. The proposed project and color rendering were presented to Jean Jourdan from the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment District in an introductory meeting and received positive feedback. No negative impacts are anticipated as a result of this request. April 20,2016 Page 8 of 11 EVANS E'. i EEE< iv • Deviation 6: LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii.- Bayshore Gateway Triangle (Allow windows at grade up to 8 feet above grade) The applicant seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.16.D.8.d.ii.which states that windows shall be located between 2 and 7 feet above sidewalk grade,to instead allow windows to be located between 0 and 8 feet above sidewalk grade. Justification 6: The applicant is proposing windows in the Porsche showroom that are intended to allow full visibility of the Porsche vehicle models being sold in the showroom which is typical for automotive dealerships. The majority of these windows are located on the south facade with some showroom windows wrapping around to the east and west facades. Porsche vehicle models are low to the ground and a 2 foot high knee wall would block most of the visibility of the vehicle. Also the requested 8 foot height is proportional to the 'floating cap" metal panels located above the windows. A per the newly revised Florida Building Code, habitable buildings located within a FEMA Zone AE, which is the current flood zone for the property, are required to have a finished floor of Base Finish Floor elevation plus 1-foot. Therefore the finished floor elevation for the proposed Porsche Building is 8.0 Ft-NAVD which is approximately 4-feet above the existing Davis Boulevard travel lanes. In order for the vehicles on display to be visible it is necessary that the display windows be placed at the same grade as the sidewalk that is adjacent to the building. The existing building currently located on the property has windows located at grade; please reference the enclosed existing site photos.There are no negative impacts associated with this request. • ****,: rx1STING EU1LDiNG WITH NDOWS AT GRADE I • s Z April 20,2016 �l Page 9 of 11 EVANS ENGINEERING 4110 Deviation 7: LDC Section 5.05.08.D.8.e.(Parking Structure Open Area) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.D.8.e.which states that for Parking Structures,the facade area within 42 inches above each floor/deck shall not be open more than 50 percent. except at openings for vehicle or pedestrian access,to instead allow the south façade of the parking structure facing Davis Boulevard to have a cable railing that will be open for 100 percent of the façade length. Justification 7: As previously described, the proposed Porsche dealership property has frontage on Davis Boulevard to the south. It is the industry standard to orientate the sales center and vehicle displays towards a major vehicle right-of-way. The applicant wishes to utilize the second floor of the parking structure that faces Davis Boulevard, which is the top floor, to display vehicles. The other parking structure facades provide a concrete guardrail that blocks the view of the vehicles from the ground floor. The zoning on the north and south side of Davis Boulevard adjacent to Porsche property is C-5 zoning which is the most intense commercial zoning. Landscape islands have been added to the ground surface parking lot directly adjacent to the parking garage foundation in order to provide vegetation adjacent to the parking garage. Additionally the middle section of the parking garage will also include a vertical green screen as shown below that will help soften the facade. These landscape islands are not required since the ground surface parking lot is completely designated for display vehicles that are for sale. The addition of the landscape islands are included to help soften the appearance of the parking garage and offsite the request to have 100%of the second story open. ,r 1=-; There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this rege equest. l • ,.- t , 00100i/I ,d 1 ' i - 11 . ' tj : 0 i i I • _, April 20,2016 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Page 10 of 11 • I Deviation 8: LDC Section 4.02.16.E.2.a,iii.b).1). (Right-of-Way Buffer along Terrace Avenue) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.E.2.a.iii.b).1). which states that the landscape buffer along road rights- of-way shall be a minimum 10-foot wide Type 0 Buffer,to instead allow a minimum of a 6.5-foot wide Type D Buffer for 76 linear feet along Terrace Avenue. Justification 8: The required building setback along Terrace Avenue is 6.5-feet and in order to eliminate the third driveway connection from the property to Terrace Avenue the internal building areas were modified so that the vehicle service area entrance is on the Porsche property. The internal building changes necessitated a building expansion to the north setback line.The loss of the 3.5'of buffer over the 76 linear feet results in 266 square feet of buffer area.This area has been compensated for further to the west in the contiguous expanded buffer area as shown below. Five small palms are proposed in this area that are in addition to the code required landscape. Furthermore Royal Palms are proposed on either side of the two(2)access driveways off Terrace Avenue. The Royal Palms along Terrace will match the Royal Palms proposed all along Davis Boulevard providing a cohesive appearance from both rights-of- way.There is no reduction in the required plantings along this buffer as a result of this request. MIMING OVEILLARPLNL_. -- -- - ----- ----—-- INTOBUFFER ROA AL PALM*, arr 01 o ®Ic:� :TERRACE AVE •i}\JR-\( ti AZ Vii ODA .4%. 404 0111, greAVII,7 a T:-lig 414111r t }j t..' X4.4 tr.„,x O ..> P te:. Q _� rbc` , :`e ' N.:"." ears,.Ccnnpe,,satwr Ar 1 t� G .. $t. ,, • ' (0,41 r '11%... o _ 512 of Buddrs Perenayr Airing `' pO t.� O 11110, 43%51 2 r —,111: . . 776 s!Buld<rp peiro.rr P ontne WY ___- ". B4Alar Canpansadon Area `L5,. 1" o , I , RUFFIR I,0.,oo l 'mo'131 w L:OMPI\SMO\ Pl.` r, ARIA PALMS RUYAI.PALMS AT ENTRANCE There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this request. 0 April 20,2016 ., <. EVANS JE'.,:-' ;EER 1= Page ii of 11 • Deviation 9:LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a. (Use of Royal Palms as Canopy Trees for 100%Davis buffer) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.06.05.D.2.a. which states that Roystonea (aka Royal Palms) shall count one palm for one canopy tree and that palms may be substituted for up to 30-percent of required canopy trees with the exception that no more than 30-percent of canopy trees may be substituted by palms within each individual Type'D' road right-of-way landscape buffer, to instead allow Royal Palms as a substitution for 100%of the required canopy trees within the Davis Boulevard Type'D'road right-of-way buffer. Justification 9: The Porsche development is required to provide a 10-foot wide Type'D'landscape buffer along Davis Boulevard with trees spaced no more than 30-feet on-center per LDC Section 4.06.05.C.4,a. According to this section of code, the 304 linear feet of Davis Boulevard frontage requires 10 canopy trees. In addition. the Gateway Triangle Redevelopment overlay code requires Parking Lot landscaping" to provide one tree or palm spaced 25-feet on- center as per Section 4,02.16.E.3.c.i.According to the overlay code for the Parking Lot Landscaping,"the 304 linear feet of Davis frontage requires 13 trees or palms.The applicant is requesting a deviation from section 4.06.05.D.2.a. to allow the use of 100%Royal Palms, 13 total,in the Davis Boulevard road right-of-way landscape buffer, The Royal Palms will be installed with an overall height of 24'which is more than the code required 10'of clear trunk at the time of planting. The taller Royal Palms are an enhancement to the development that will provide a presence along Davis Boulevard, , mss ' --for itimiii'i* .�„ 1 f air. v.;,aw.. ti s er.:s lei . ...,..:— ., ; 1 . I . =rt. _ . III . licSiz.iiolm Oi$U __- ;1— N1© c7 _A _., {jr i w S. S�!Y�'r�: '.III NtR ! v4,;,. � 1 ;� • At.,F 1RI #a+,1 ;CI ;� Iii r I am VP r *- o--..rte .crv�� t. O • r'' ROI hi.P Ai Nis awl""Ni.011re t . p •a .......,... ,._ i a .,-. ern- � ► s ral 1171�� li 0 1 0 v _ am o, '! •` "' , A j "I#,.. . .1 I Mir .t. \ - tea' ..t71_-•' The existing property has four(4)quality Royal Palms at the entrance that the applicant would like to utilize within the proposed Porsche project. In an effort to utilize these existing Royal Palms and provide a landscape plan that complemented the"Modern International" architecture style of the building, Royal Palms are being requested along the entire Davis Boulevard frontage and an additional four (4) Royal Palms are proposed at the two (2) access connections to Terrae Avenue to the North. The use of the Royal Palms along both street frontages provides a • cohesive appearance for the site. There are no negative impacts anticipated as a result of this request. 5AcY COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 SITE,PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT LDC Section 10.02.03 F Ch. 6.I of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT: TT of Naples, Inc ADDRESS: 505 S. Flagler Dr. Suite 700 CITY West Palm Beach STATE FL ZIP 33401 TELEPHONE# 561.655.8900 CELL# FAX# 561.655.8114 E-MAIL ADDRESS: cmiller@amsinet.com NAME OF AGENT: Kristina M. Johnson FIRM: J.R. Evans Engineering, P.A. ADDRESS: 9351 Corkscrew Road, Suite 102 CITY Estero STATE FL ZIP 33928 TELEPHONE# 239.405.9148 CELL# 239.285.6999 FAX# 239.288.2537 E-MAIL ADDRESS: kjohnson@jreeng.com CORRESPONDING SDP,SDPA,SIPS INFORMATION This application shall be submitted in conjunction with one of the following: site development plan, site development plan amendment, or site improvement plan. PROJECT NAME/PL#IF KNOWN: PL 20150002617 PLANNER/PROJECT MANAGER, IF KNOWN: Dan Smith DATE OF SUBMITTAL OF SDP/SDPA/SIP: 1/7/2016 • 9/11/2014 Page 1 of 3 Attachment B Ced r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 r , INFORMATION REGARDING DEVIATION REQUESTS A site plan with deviations for redevelopment provides a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations (excluding height), architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings,structures,or site features nonconforming. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan, site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03. Except for the requested deviations,the site plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. In accordance with LDC section 10.02.03 F, "redevelopment" shall mean the renovation, restoration, or remodeling of a building or structure, or required infrastructure, in whole or in part, where the existing buildings,structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. DEVIATION REQUESTS The application must address the follow requirements.Please attach the required narratives and explanations. 1. A narrative of the redevelopment project and how it is consistent with the standards for approval, LDC • section 10.02.03 F.7. 2. Description of each requested deviation and justification for each request. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition. The LDC section for which the deviation seeks relief from shall be identified. 3. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly identified on the site plan and explanation provided. 4. Deviation Request types: Zoning Deviation Requests-Check all that may be impacted by the request. ❑ Dimensional standards(excluding height): ❑ Parking Architectural ❑ Landscape/Buffers ❑ Other site features: Engineering Deviation Requests-Check all that may be impacted by the request. ❑ Stormwater ❑ Pathways Transportation Planning ❑Other site features: • 9/11/2014 Page 2 of 3 Co er County . COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.coliiergov.net (239)252-2400 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Site Development Plan with Deviations for 9 ❑ ❑ Redevelopment Application Completed SDP/SDPA/SIP application and all associated materials, 9+ ❑ ❑ including all site plan documents. Copy for the Pre-Application Notes, if not submitted with 1 ❑ ❑ SDP/SDPA/SIP Affidavit of Authorization,signed and notarized 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic Copy of all documents and plans on CD *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all ❑ Q ❑ materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. +Unless waived by the Project Manager. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARNG PROCESS: • At the completion of the review process by County review staff,the applicant shall submit all materials . electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. PEE.REQUIREMENTS 1 E Site Plan for Redevelopment:$1,000.00 E Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 $500.00 Credit for Pre-application meeting. All checks payable to:Board of County Commissioners The completed application,all required submittal materials,and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 • 9/11/2014 Page 3 of 3 Coir County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 A FFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) P L 201 5 O O O I, Slave Tent (print name),as Assistant Secretary (title,if applicable)of TT°l Naples,Inc (company,If applicable),swear or affirm under oath,that[am the (choose one)owner x applicant contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s)requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred,conveyed,sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize J.fl.Evans Engineering.PA, to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation,then it is usually executed by the corp.pres.or v.pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company(L.L.C)or Limited Company(LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership,then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner"of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance,first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penaltie of perjury,I declar: hat I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. • /�� 7 / Signature- Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER f The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on 3( I (`7! r (date) by (name of person providing oath or affirmation),as '( `lL .• C r_4, who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification)as identifications. a°1::,etc ELIZABETH OWENS STAMP/SEA * MY COMMISSION i FF 501891 Signature c of Notary Public . dedDiS:Aug otarySa19 440 me BavJedTArogudgetwsiarysmke CP1Og.00A•00115u55 8/7/2015 Page 7 of 11 • OWNER AFFIDAVIT Well, Steve Terry,TT of Naples,Inc being first duly sworn, depose and say that well am/are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We/I understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner We/lfurther authorize J.R.Evans Engineering,P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this Petition. Sign•ture of 'roperty Owner Signature of Property Owner Steve Terry,TT of Naples.Inc • Typed or Printed Name of Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this CA day of 4OU 20 IS by t,L x� �� ^�^�/ who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. ) State of Florida (Signature ofNotary Public-State of Florida) County of Collier Notary Stamp ;":."," . EuzpgEm ow s *MY0014 10101itFF907991 .p, +If EXPIRES:August6,2019 Pro" Boded tMr8vdddNobyB4J tp 410 Co er County • COLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 Pre-Appileation Meeting Sign-in Sheet IIS Pt.*• Collier County Contact information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email O Richard Anderson Environmental Specialist 252-2483 richardanderson@colliergov.net 0 David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net ❑0 Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net I g Steve Baluch,P.E. Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch@colliergov.net -0 Laurie Beard Transportation Pathways 252-5782 Lauriebeard@colliergov.net O Rachel Beasley Planner 252-8202 rachelbeasley@colliergov.net ❑ Marcus Berman County 5urveyor 252-6885 Marcus8erman@colliergov.net ❑ Madelin Bunter Architectural Review 252-8523 madelinbunster@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@colliergov.net ❑ George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 ieorgecascio@colliergov.net III ❑ Heidi Ashton Clcko Managing Asst.County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov.net ❑ Eric Fey,P.E. Site Plans Reviewer 252-2434_ ericfey@colliergov.net XPaula Fleishman _ Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net Li Nancy Gundlach,AICP,PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net C Shar Hingson _ East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Services , 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net ❑ Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@colliergov.net C Alicia Humphries1 Site Plans Reviewer/ROW 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net C Eric Johnson,AICP,CFM _ Zoning Services 252-2931 ericjohnson@colliergov.net ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net ❑ Stephen Lenberger _ Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net ❑ Paulo Martins _ Utilities 252-4285 paulomartlns@colliergov.net Xomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colllergov.net O Jack McKenna,P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net Matt McLean,P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net u Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net O Annis Moxam _ Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net ❑ Stefanie Nawrocki Planning and Zoning 252-2313 StefanieNawrocki@colliergov.net ❑ Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree@colliergov.net • ❑ Brandy Otero , Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net 4 S ! cnty • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252.2400 C Bill Pancake Fire Safety 252-2310 BillPancake@colliergov.net ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net ,1(Fred Reischl,AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net ❑ Stacy Revay Transportation Pathways 252-5677 stacyrevay@colliergov.net I ❑ Brett Rosenblum,P.E. Utili Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net Michael Sawyer 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net C CPrby Schmidt,AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net Chris Scott,AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net Daniel Smith,AICD Landscape Review 252-431.2 danielsmlth@colliergov.net 'iEllen Summers Planning and Zoning 252-1032 EllenSummers@colliergov.net Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net Iij Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstraln@colliergov.net Ili Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergov.net ❑ Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks,AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net I • ❑ Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email pth,n- �.ti k i rt5 jt. 6\405 E� . Ya s 13 a# 6 J,�a rocrll „ 0100,4-"",r. .,4--- /S4, 1?-k ."';�-E..+>nt't c4-u,,1 r)(,,,c6,P....�.,-.)r - fl 4A d:L..1 CO f..„', M it..t,GYL n s SO-GS giov or (L.LL,Z(;' -/n.5 ih/2/-ra 1PAIk zbaws q%..) . at- t( c �-q/o1'7?Pit KNA,sa,/� €./,i.PeE J( . co 'Sot.— tit-t--../ftG E /M_J.L. -701-bW ,4,._, /tic/.4 ear,-,50 . Q> w :al Vi alII i J afscL c' iV4,1Al 3oc.iiC* itel J 'rr►.st�pbrs` 8 vtovieS•t_am • Co County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.coiliergov.net (239)252-2400 Pre.-Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Site;Plan with Deviations Date and Time: Normber 24,2015 Assigned Planner: Daniel James Smith, AICP Engineering Manager(for PPL's and FP's): Project Inforrnatiarr Project Name: Porsche of Naples PL#: Property ID#: 70720400101 Current Zoning: C-5 GTMUD- MXD OVERLAY Project Address: 3147 Davis Blvd. City: State: Zip: Applicant: MAgent Name: Phone: Agent/Firm Address: City: State: Zip: Property Owner: Please provide the following,if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed#of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments,indicate the original petition number: v. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project Is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: S County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 Meeting Naffs I F.r t-e Rzv..re cA? - tV PP/0 ,- tSY Tt43 a, tti - .s ettliPar tP>` tuehc Gam Ci84 tgarkl lin- 1:045 LS4,41.461-- 1-1-1,40 c r -6f= tgAi&ketAregl totAtiMdc. iitAACiPsi tra ... fa f • A cAtichfr 411:040210P' A gr"ice I - 44 ' r u - Pc-s'( sk-irr/ AL ^4 -01 PeLln€ - /'rt fill tt'7/ ��I<� im (v jZ&F2 1Q c.CS,cr ` x Yf. O2 J of 704( z� • �� 1 lrr/2-0‘....,!'rc .ter 71/ Y,50/ ck4 64,24-1 (A. e4ci-e3f. 6714,1-11.7 Qei no/. -fix. tiac.'u vd tixi✓vi /4 n tri - t_o n 76 r L.""`f tt vl t e 7 lC D U"j` d C/- it /9 tf j PrP vt—tel/.S' haVo w 1`/1 /teed 40 a 1,r v v c. t4E-61, C1 a vt ry GLC[ev4 bewil ("It )14 - ltr- — Phticra+ `t)..4-el r-, 14 E �-u-�► 5��.�p } `cad vt, te► Lha w he e.J -, ?teas LT .,div io vr�.421-7 � &T J 5 . 4 r -- T N it.(4-1 County • COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 wwrw.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 Meeting Nates 10 i - -� ......-ANL . * lei c-E' /e-da, -> .)0 bve,614.41r: ge.v. . • • Co County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT LDC Section 10.02.03 F Ch. 61 of the Administfative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPUCANT: Porsche of Naples ADDRESS: 3147 Davis Blvd. CITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE# CELL it FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS: 1111/ NAME OF AGENT: FIRM: ADDRESS: CITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE# CELL# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS: CORRESPONDING SDP,SDPA,SIP INFORMATION This application shall be submitted in conjunction with one of the following: site development plan, site development plan amendment,or site improvement plan. PROJECT NAME/PL#IF KNOWN: PLANNER/PROJECT MANAGER,IF KNOWN: DATE OF SUBMITTAL OF SDP/SDPA/SIP: I 9/11/2014 Page 1 of 3 Cu County COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 INFORMATION REGARDING DEVIATION REQUESTS A site plan with deviations for redevelopment provides a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations (excluding height), architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings,structures,or site features nonconforming. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan,site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03.Except for the requested deviations,the site plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. In accordance with LDC section 10.02.03 F, "redevelopment" shall mean the renovation, restoration, or remodeling of a building or structure, or required infrastructure, in whole or in part, where the existing buildings,structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. DEVIATION REQUESTS The application must address the follow requirements.Please attach the required narratives and explanations. • 1. A narrative of the redevelopment project and how it is consistent with the standards for approval, LDC section 10.02.03 F.7. 2. Description of each requested deviation and justification for each request. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition. The LDC section for which the deviation seeks relief from shall be identified. 3. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly identified on the site plan and explanation provided. 4. Deviation Request types: Zoning Deviation Requests-Check all that may be impacted by the request. U Dimensional standards(excluding height): ❑ Parking ❑Architectural ❑Landscape/Buffers ❑Other site features: Engineering Deviation Requests-Check all that may be impacted by the request, Stormwater ❑ Pathways ❑Transportation Planning ❑Other site features: 9/11/2014 Page 2 of 3 Co County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 MAMMAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST I REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Site Development Plan with Deviations for 9 ❑ Redevelopment Application Completed SDP/SDPA/SIP application and all associated materials, 9+ ❑ including all site plan documents. Copy for the Pre-Application Notes,if not submitted with 1 SDP/SDPA/SIP Affidavit of Authorization,signed and notarized 1 E Electronic Copy of all documents and plans on CD *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all [] materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. +Unless waived by the Project Manager. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARNG PROCESS: • At the completion of the review process by County review staff,the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQUIREMENTS • Site Plan for Redevelopment:$1,000.00' ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 All checks payable to:Board of County Commissioners The completed application,all required submittal materials,and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN:Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,FL 34104 9/11/2014 Page 3 of 3 �4 D{Strtt ti 4 3135 r.PEN qR „ e 4 " . ' �,. 2 ~ , i �' 1472 : �� 11,,,,,t,„,,,„:--,,,,,,,,.„,,--.,,,,,,r1 __ '� ..-,r[^ _ :�.$: ex, .._ _., `r,- ' f s t .„,„_ .„,„ ,„„,.. „. :,. :. .t.:-., , .. , r .. , -„,i " # f4 .i.,,,t,..,,„,..,,,.„-.8„.,,:„±:„..„7„,. .',; t r L § �;. fie "A E. ,-- ,:!,....,..o. h'i` z�C,'Ss- h,s'.,..„- y, �5 �'R - - ,. .i..44 ,., , a i .," . ss� r S. X1500 ,l .,•,. i. -;--i..37-2,-1.:sr.' -V. ..'-.3 -. -,..i...4*--.ri;'..Ti-7 '*'. t '. I 4' 1. , �„ fa -. -,,, Tt50 N r ° ' ., r rh. ., 3 9"e x �; ,' ',,:.---;-,,,'''',4%.7:1,;...-..-, n H m T `g' . ."F P' a '31144'' '' {`x.es9 fi `T, d +aY k 'L h9, (D } .° °�'' 1548 s,4i ` � Wind Load Category 2: 166 mph a �i L J .. s, iS `§tM 4 Sty. f » .Z tea. rt, I , 1 ��: t � ' ��;, v-_� Sir ld z S•i01 , 1I:1+fR.12.5 , w .. '« �:-`.•.• ...aMc--- ga�Mrs.,,,w#ut-' i •RL' ,.. ..,. • K _ x .....rr�..na...�,a,-.,aaw...;..es;*' - .e.,va.,_ .t.'� , i,. 1 at.+ _ cwt '..r.` al �f > .S@ . ksi aA } ��„,*,,,,,,, ,,,,,.4..:/.- a 3u�-*i1 1 ''.� 7:. --:--7....-',.7.7,-t-17..7..” 4-.,.-1;,...- -'-.•-',..-51.--. s Al '. , p°. yid ./ $ T: 50 '� _. ,;4‘4 T:50 I. au " R 2� 3 R:25 ZY''''$44, kY.+ w,.lc 44 k, 3148pt, > i ° : .. . � ; 3196 ', * ,31 4 rFxN ": ' 7'. 1600 r Coder C.,ourity I COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 ADDRESSINGCHECKLIST ECKL1ST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to ore-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE(Indicate type be/ow,complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL(Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP(Site Development Plan) BD(Boat Dock Extension) au SDPA(SDP Amendment) Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI(Insubstantial Change to SDP) Q CU(Conditional Use) SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP(Excavation Permit) Dal SIPI(Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat 0 SNR(Street Name Change) LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) SNC(Street Name Change—Unplatted) PNC(Project Name Change) TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) PPL(Plans&Plat Review) VA(Variance) • ❑ PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) 0 VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) 0 PUD Rezone 0 VRSFP(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) RZ(Standard Rezone) J OTHER Site Plans with Deviation Redevelopment LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description may be attached) See attached 02-50-25 FOUO(Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach to,or associate with,legal description if more than one) 70720400101 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(as applicable,if already assigned) 3147 DAVIS BLVD • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME(if applicable) Porsche of Naples PROPOSED STREET NAMES(if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER(for existing projects/sites only) • SDP____- or AR or PL# 20120000431-SDPI PL20130001657 , /P. • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 Project or development names proposed for,or already appearing in,condominium documents(if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email 0 Fax 0 Personally picked up Applicant Name: Christopher R. Mitchell , RE Phone: (239)682-2248 Email/Fax:cmitchell@jreeng.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name • approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 70720400101 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number rier Approved by: /r['7CGl Date: 11118/15 Updated by: Date: S IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE . UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED • • Porsche of Napes Legal Description ROCK CREEK PARK BLK A LOTS 20-28 AND LOTS 35-43 LESS E 15FT OF LOT 35, LESS THAT 8FT X 14FT PORTION AS DESC IN OR 4895 PG 2881 • • , . 8114/2015 Collier County Property APPraiser Collier County Property Appraiser wilb t1t ,1 a+ i � .,4 I t'41111F-1 ........_ 4: MINIMA 1 i......t ,,,,,,,,,,, k , :. 4. . 511 1111 Introduction Search for Parcels byq •Search Results ,4._ - ., Familia:70720400101 Name:TT OF NAPLES C .- �+ } 111IN Smart I None:3147 DAVIS BLVD rII 0441140/ A120.1 r: ..� 1A, I 'fi- ' i. u'' ga 9>.ii. eft �Ta •Legend {a..... t 0 Print iE r$ �, 4. 1 *Home Page r: Al 4 +r Help ex i:is 1 r J ;irk# 1 i'443 'l $a �, ; . ` t I . ,. 1 ..., �O-sdrt Moat FlmtoRWiy Jwary Winn-7015-Rona•gall Location Map for Porsche of Naples - property highlighted I S httpl/www.edlierappraiser.com/webmap/Map.aspx?cepaver=1,9.2&msize=L 1/1 • • F. Site plan with y',` for redevelopment projects. Propose.A site 'Ian with shall provide a means for a redevelo•ment +project to seek dimensional _ excludin height,architectural � �� a ', ,and �'��-� �,'' from site features,such as but not limited to,landscaping,parking,and buffers,from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings,structures or site features nonconforming. 2. Applicability. A site plan with 4146' may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan,site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03.Except for the requested • t«_,° the site development plan or site improvement plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03.For purposes of this section,"Redevelopment"shall mean the renovation,restoration,or remodeling of a building or structure,or required infrastructure,in whole or in part,where the existing buildings,structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. 3. Application. The Administrative Code shall establish the process and submittal requirements for a site plan with .w r•;f-'4. for redevelopment projects application. a. Requested ' shall be clearly delineated and justified in the petition.Project enhancements to offset or minimize the y' :" mit- shall also be clearly stated. b. Projects subject to the provisions of LDC section 5.05.08 shall submit architectural drawings that are signed and sealed by a licensed architect registered in the State of Florida. c. The site construction plans shall be signed and sealed by the applicant's professional engineer,licensed to practice in the State of Florida. d. The landscaping plans shall be signed and sealed by the applicant's landscape architect, registered in the State of Florida. e. The survey shall be signed and sealed by the applicant's professional surveyor and mapper, registered in the State of Florida. 4. Staff review and recommendation. Based upon evaluation of the factors set forth in LDC section 10.02.03.F.8,County Staff shall prepare a report containing their review findings and a recommendation of approval,approval with conditions,or denial. 5. Public notice. Public notice of the hearing shall be as required by the LDC section 10.03.06 Q and Chapter 6 of the Administrative Code. 6. Public hearing. The Hearing Examiner shall hold at least one public quasi-judicial hearing to review the proposed site plan with � `. a. Review. The Hearing Examiner shall hear the petition following receipt of the staff report and • application by the Office of the Hearing Examiner.At the public hearing,the Hearing • Examiner shall consider the applicant's justification for the requested i ,the staff report,the standards of approval and any other relevant testimony and evidence. b. Decision. The Hearing,Examiner shall render a decision to approve,approve with conditions, or deny the requested { r3i"'" within 30 days of the public hearin .If approved,or approved with conditions,the decision shall specifically note the • ;•.•„ j and the basis for their approval.A decision by the Hearing Examiner shall be rendered prior to the issuance of the approval letter by the County Manager or designee for the site plan. 7. Standards for approval. The petition shall be reviewed for consistency with the following standards: a. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose. e. • Streets,utilities,drainage facilities,recreation areas,sizes and yards,architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities,sight distances,landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. f. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district.The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. h. m :.". shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. J• Approval of the gip`:. will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. 8. Timeframe. Time limits for site plans will be pursuant to LDC section 10.02.03 H. • • J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING Deviation 1:(Multiple Access Points Alonq_Single Frontage) The applicant seeks relief from Resolution 13—257(adopted Access Management Policy,as may be amended), Section 3.09.2.1 which requires no more than one connection per road frontage,to instead allow three(3)driveway connections to Terrace Avenue. Justification 1: The applicant is proposing a Porsche Dealership with a sales center, automotive servicing center, and vehicular storage garage. The different service areas have different levels of access including the general public, sales staff, maintenance staff, and lastly automotive shipping trucks. In order for the site plan to properly function to meet the needs of the dealership the applicant is requesting three(3)driveway connections to Terrace Avenue. Currently the property has two(2)driveway connections to Terrace Avenue that the applicant wishes to retain as well as request one(1)additional driveway connection as seen in the accompanying Site Plan. Deviation 2:(Allow Minimum throat length of 30 feet) The applicant seeks relief from Construction Standards Handbook for work Within the Public Right-of-way , Collier County, Section III,C.6.b.(2)which requires a minimum throat length of 50 feet,to instead allow for minimum length of 30 feet. Justification 2: • Deviation 3:(Allow Minimum measured length of 30 feet from edge of pavement) The applicant seeks relief from Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right-of-Way, Collier County, Section III,C.6.c.(3) which requires that commercial gates provide a minimum throat length of 30 feet, measured from the right-of-way line to the face of the gate, to instead allow for a minimum length of 30 feet to be measured from the nearest edge of pavement of the roadway to the face of the gate. Justification 3: Deviation 4: (Allow 144 S.F.spaced aluminum panel) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.8 which requires that Blank walls must not exceed 20' horizontal or 10'vertical.Joints must be decorative and spaced less than 120 s.f,to instead allow utilizing Porsche"floating cap", which is a single plane of aluminum panel,with reveals every 144 s.f. Justification 4: This design is mandated/required by Porsche Corporate.Generally,an automotive dealership would not have glazing on secondary facades, but glazing has been added above the Porsche prototype to offset the blank walls, on other facades. Deviation 5:(Allow Terrace Avenue facade to have less than 30%glazing) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.2.c.ii which requires having primary facades of 30% glazing, to instead allow 16%glazing. Justification 5: An automotive dealership consists of Sales and Service functions. Generally a Service Shop is behind the Showroom,and does not have as much glazing because it is an interior-focused work environment. In this case,our Shop is a primary façade, so we have provided more glazing than would be traditionally seen on a Service Shop, however there is not enough wall space to accomplish all the access points, glazing,and still provide for structural • shear walls on this site(which is in a hurricane zone). J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD,STE. 102/ESTERO,FL 33928/239.405.9148(p)/239.288.2537(f) WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM Date J,R. EVANS ENGINEERING Page 2 of 2 Deviation 6: (Allow additional roof change greater than 100 feet) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 5.05.08.C.10.b.i which requires providing additional roof every 100 linear foot,to instead allow two curves having approximately 125 feet and 118 feet. Justification 6: This design is mandated/required by Porsche Corporate. The facade facing Davis Boulevard utilizes the Porsche 'floating cap,'which is a continuous curve which wraps the Service Drive, Showroom and New Vehicle Delivery. It has an uninterrupted roofline, other than the glazing "slot" at the front entry, which splits the metal panels into two curves. There is no change in parapet height until the curve breaks at the Service Shop. The two curves are approximately 125'and 118'.Because the wall is curved,a person would not see an uninterrupted linear material all at once.From a street perspective,the curved wall would appear less than 100'. Deviation 7:(Using Colors or Materials above a level 8 saturation of more than 10%of a facade) The applicant seeks relief from LX 5.05.08.C.13.b.i which states to use colors or Materials above level 8 saturations is limited to no more than 10% of a facade, to instead allow in all portion of building apart from Showroom or Customer area. Justification 7: The use of the black acts as a neutral backdrop to allow the silver panels on the Showroom to be the prominent design feature. This is durable material,which is required for a building on a tight site,with vehicles driving close to the building throughout the day. Deviation 8:(Using Metal or Corrugated panels more than 33%of the façade area) The applicant seeks relief from LX 5.05.08.C.13.c which requires Metal or corrugated panels are limited to no more than 33%of the facade area,to instead allow more than 33%of the facade area. Justification 8: This design is mandated/required by Porsche Corporate.The use of the black acts as a neutral backdrop to allow the silver panels on the Showroom to be the prominent design feature. The product is a high-end metal siding,and is not reflective of a stereotypical'metal building." Deviation 9:(Allow windows to have 8'above sidewalk grade) The applicant seeks relief from Bayshore Gateway Triangle D.8.d,ii which requires windows shall be located between 2 and 7 feet above sidewalk grade,to instead allow sidewalk grade to 8'above sidewalk grade. Justification 9: The glazing design is intended to allow visibility of the product being sold. Porsches are low to the ground,and a 2' knee wall would essentially block most of the visibility of the vehicle.The 8'height is set by the panel sizes,to complement the proportion of the metal panels above in even increments. Deviation 10:(Foundation planting not to be provided) The applicant seeks relief from LDC 4.02.16.E.4 which requires foundation planting at building perimeter,to instead allow not to provide foundation plantings. Justification 10: As with the glazing requirement above,foundation plantings effectively block the main area of display for a vehicle, which is low to the ground. Additionally,to accommodate the front plaza requirement,we have limited area to provide plantings and sidewalk. To offset the lack of foundation plantings,we propose to add larger trees to the site, 18'overall height(10'is the requirement).We will also provide 1,640 sf of flowering shrubs as a buffer on Davis Blvd. J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD,STE.1021 ESTERO,FL 33928 1239.405.9148(p)/239.288.2537(f) WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM '411Zik 0 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING PORSCHE OF NAPLES-PROJECT LOCATION r \. . ` Iw , ti 1�� t .e mmen . . r "N, � ._ 0 ,. ., xuLns •fatal -- ELA m LIMA. y -- - .....Mob...... 113 =I IMAM ilmordlirera I Ft... MIMI e1e113310Yelrt 61 �� ®rre m Parma eM�r1 .,,,,:....-4-:,7„....--.-....-: ®1 limn=6.333330 Q~A 11.e.••elee••e t fret � e. MI ----7T—r.' .Yti .r ' OF, f ®Y1T.P n gm...,c.,...* l 1 tf1;:a S J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING 9351 CORKSCREW ROAD, STE. 102/ESTERO,FL 33928 1239.405.9148 (p)/239.288.2537(1) WWW JREVANSENGINEERING COM a'Z • J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING PORSCHE OF NAPLES- SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATION CRITERIA Dated: 4-20-2016 As per Collier County LDC 10.02.03.F.7.we offer the following: a. Land uses within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved uses in the zoning district. The land is zoned C5, which permits automobile dealerships. b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established (Bayshore Redevelopment District) and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. Prospective Porsche purchasers and Porsche owners having their vehicles serviced will also use goods and services available from nearby suppliers. The development provides beneficial services. revenue from the multiplier effect - employment opportunities to the community and enhances the area economy by employees utilizing retail and food and beverage suppliers in the surrounding area as well as tax revenue. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each function (sales and vehicle service)of the development shall be adequate to service its intended purpose and will be monitored by specific access requirements. e. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural • features,vehicular parking and loading facilities,sight distances,landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. All of these enumerated features are present and functioning as they have historically since this is a redevelopment of the same type of use on the site. f. Visual character of the project shall be greater in quality and visual impact than that required by the development standards of the zoning district and the surrounding area. The development proposes a unified architectural style with complementary landscape and hardscape features which will benefit the area also. g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee is not applicable at this point in time. h. Deviations are clearly delineated in the accompanying documents and reflect what are considered to enhance the overall development. i. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development including enhanced landscaping, planters, pavers,and green screens. Visual representations are included in the Deviation Justifications document accompanying this application. j. Approval of the deviations will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. The proposed Porsche Dealership will provide an improvement in the surrounding area. • J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING 9351 CORKSCREW'ROAD, STE 102 I ESTERO, F L 33928 1239.405.9148(p)J 239.288.2537(I) WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING COM • I 1 _ _ 0 ii! 11 it • i i 4 -111 6 Y 1 y 11 . G _ \\\\ Y a tee • limaA 1 R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P. 14 M Ic91111{CIAwMW.SUM x: PORSCHE OF NAPLES ...ovum" {TR TS.r' AliZi MEM WWII.11421 "WM PINI.419661 1 T 6a 1.139111111 MP as°#fi rt A WWW.igvuuANJIeiMK�COM .MAN JIM OPEN SPACE COMPARISON EXHIENT -• . , ,. - , r .,, . „... ...„.„-:-. 7 I ,:-•- ___- - •_, _ .. _ . ,r_ ... _ :r.._ .,. 7„. '_ ,.:_-.:4ii':.,ii:,,,m_,,,, , ,,, ,,..; ,,.,t•'..-.,4%,,fii:-.;,,I,--',.• -' I • .t.•st`NO& , soss, 1 tsl's .- %.*N. . .• ._ . .116,'"-' 't'....„1100,7".•::...-,- .._ _ „ .-.. '•f .__„... . -2M1Z, .... ...,. _ ,.10 ... .........- IP . ___.....„.. .... ....__. 4 :-Iteivr— - ---:--'- :t. U i -..',..,..A .,:. — • - i e ,.. i . s.., .. ''''.-....., II 71',.....;;;;;;:;0•Iii7f..:,i;;Si,',I,',--`44W. _.. ..... . ' .•... ....s......,-,, ..-......„.--.... , ... - 7..i..,-.%(-.74.:Si.'!-1,...'''',•,..'''',.'''',-.' ;" -. , _ ,,,,. -.......^.' i - ' s- '..-1:-':-,,5•174;i-.=4.'''',.'"-, ':'''.'' .1 '' .,..„..,„.....„.„,...„„„;..........,„11117''.'...---...-.7----' ., .. --- -4:::.1;i:c...*•:'.4-',.`nv..;.;..-*1.i ' i [ . , ..• •--,,,,-.1.--7,,.,..0!.,14f-.40.--,.,„..'''..! ! , ' \-7.1 . , • .), ' .... * ' , „,„,„.i. , _ ,, ..,.._:',';i:::-;.17'0,.;:tfiki•';1;1,A.:!•:5;4',f-! ' --,, -g. 11111.111 ''',E:.' ' -'''''' ,-..,,. ,...,'., --...-.--:t'','!1.'„,.--:,;-',•;.*L.:,,f-iTt-k •-„,-='-..., i i , 4t- . ..4.0.4, -.'.. . .._ . ...... ..,.... . . , -- . . .. . ... . ' 1 -4.— . - ,,... . 1 . 1. ..•' ,,... ,..-..'- ". ( ,,.....,„ —"-S-, - - . s 4.,,. tg.".-._•,,:!'j'it'----; , . _ ...,,. ._ -• • . . , ,3 . . ,..,... ._._ •—- — .1. . ilk,,..„ ‘• 4, s . . . . . . :, i ,,;i1" • * 1., ------.., t' ik , p \ , ..-. „. ,._• .. , --, . •••* •.;",- •*-- •-- -- -tv'.'4--- ' 4111111F --','-li•i':,,P-:.,--;;•'-'4:--''-:''---' --------____:, - ....' -4,e----- ,••••• ',..-,- -04, r r 1 -. 0 . .. , .V ...-4,....-.' { I% I I. ,ro i t l , i+ ; f � k i , MR,. li f i „. . I I 1 Iiii _. I • F tr j j �! 1 /,,,,,,''As:. .,,e,';;;.-,,,,•,,, i.. , .,_..... 11, e .ems 17j ,:„_._:j.. . - '1*/.*."' '''---. --- - el. ,_ , _, . „...... . . .,r ,, .. .._.. . _ _. ..., _ „ . ,. _,, ,:,_: .....1%„.,„,,,,..,; ...;., . ,:„,. ,.. ., .,_ , , ..„„,!,::_,,..., ..,. . ,. ..,..„,•._......., ...;,....1„.., ..,.----- f - ��r` r , . � fit- „4y - s „_ A 4 0 117: '4 1:it I' Ac,... 4 \ / O . I] . . .......... , .. .. Ilik ' . 1 , . , Idt . .. . t fig h .,_ . e �V4r ir I: '/ '. ..'e dy yy� � ! ki p: V1 Sn i e _.:1",,,":', :LI,fiffilif: (At P# ... .ar, 0b 1 ff:a,','-.,, t ,, ,;,,;:_'„.,,,r:,\''7„1, ,_..) ,i , ill= --- I 1:1:- `, . 3 tr ' 4 i .a 1 M 01,4 .4. l ' 111 I , I I IIii :!ff-f-f . , , . .. . , I , . ,... •1if- ; 0 - 1 , . . , . . . . . ,.. . . 1 ; ;- 1 i 1 if f ..ifit 1 1 1 k 1, 1 , i 1 . i11. , i , 1 ‘1 - if.Jo, : 1 ' , . . . , 1 1 1 11 11 ! , . . 1,- . I . - - , . ' t , - , ; 1 ii '- •t- 1 I .. - -, ill,i. , '-.,....,,, i ' 1. , ' i i I • - . I '. i 1 11,1-1i,'L.'-ii'-, .'1 , ' I, ' ' , .:, - i i i I ' ' ' - 1 1 1 : ..-', i 1 .' : ' , ,' i I ••• ;i(i-:-*- -,; — . - , . . , • , , , ,,i , , . , . _ .„, ..„ , , i .. , ,,, 1 1 : , I • le, , -1,t ;1; . I ' I , I 1 , i i I , -'''.- — ''.. . . 1 il ''A t ., 2:;:tr''''''.: j '. .:, , ''', '''' .: ; i 't`-,:,,4 iff i .'' - 1 . tip. 1441114.140.i..t.w,,i,i"..i.'-,-,(,i;1-1-11-, ' . -?, •.. - _ 11H- ,. ... „.., ,, , ,,. 1--- : 1 , i , : . , -'',L ,. .,t -..-.; -;. -I; , • , , , ;. i ,, . 1, - 1 1 { „,--, T.,:: „I , ; : ' , '. 1. •.'. I '; ,i---O '--,11: ,'. i 1 ; ' II ' 1 I i 1 1 -,`, IS_ , . , , , , . . ' , , ; . I Ili . it -, ., ,1- . 111,-1 • ii . . , - ,, - . , . - ; - , , - -. :04. r. I , Il 1 ' 1 tt .,..... ' 1 ' t ,,. 4 44 ,.... . , ... it ..... .., ,-- ) .- jib., y ,Afet-791F,-- It . -; .., ----t- ...,„ ..., '.• --- . ---'-- , -. '-' r ,Ik ,f --,_ .. . . � s- '� kh Li.. ., , emA �, . .. y � , � # r , • a , y. a pv§ i .. �.. / i it' al__, ... ......, . :.. 1 ,iti . , . ..,..„„ . ,,,,..,:s. __ , . 1 ,... ....„,, ,, ,,,..., ...,..___.. ,.. , ._ . ...,...„.„ ,: i ,, . •,,••• . t , ' _ _ o , 1 1 , ,,, , .. . .... ... , ......... , :',..I.,,r,... 1 \ , r 1�\!Iii 'r ` • s X11, ,Ii,-,—7',-77.•, i 3 • • ` yy , '11','' ////f////liiii?:*/!1� � . : /��\2\\,i/li, /ƒ ,° \ /«?y »2 � � �y 2±»0-- % ,i t /©© . ? \\ ' « < 2« :. y . . . . .y . . . . < . . . } y ` . , \ , . f» . 4 f d 4 \ | . 11110 ., \ : I . ; .- . 'j:,0 , 0 . . . , '.•,, s . .. -1 , .... „,.. -, ... , t . I, 4 .. ,--- I • ''.1 I •,:.'?-* t -''''.V.•4.:1 -. ,. -- . , r., 4.... , . .„,„ I I I . ,.,.-„. , . - . f i A . , ,.. ....,„..... ...,.„ I All t ,, ,............_ t ,,... I' , ... _ .... .., .... .„„, ..., Si'•_,'.' It I I ., 1. tal1 „ . , . - . . , . -, ... . 0 10.. • , , i ...„4,61, eAir ,I ...No- . , ,.., . .,.. ., ,1,- .• , ,.. 4A _, . I ' .,-,:'.1:1,f,'-z,,,•,,,,T-,- i , 1 4 r ...6 4...:.;:;;,"-7....1,r...i',41-'''..'', - 1 t-t-t1L-4; r ' ' / -,7*....,..:E.,,,E,J../Ef.,...,„, , E/*'''- I .;,.,., • - 4--:::,-,-,:',,it-,.*:-...:.i.-;•'„,*-:,:.---.1.ii-2ii''g- -.t,. f ' v • / / i : .. .; f , _ . [ ll'i --Irit.:.4f L4.'"'-'---- , , - . i 1 . • .. — .......- ,.,,...,,.. _ „ . ... _ .__ . , - . . . . . . ..._ , . .. . . , , ..... / , Or - -**, - ./ . ,MEr- ...) E „.....,.. k'l.„, . .g.s t '1 0ilit. --... ania. 0 .-, i I i • _.� � , _ 7 . , , 1 , 11--J _ - _ . W_ . .. - { 00 ke . •0 i 0 $3 9 4. ,vo Ho- ) 0 Nt1111fitfi1ilt�l INN11i1er 7- ;• iiiinivini • • - R � s Fv �. . i111r y1N� , 6 0 i : • 5 1 tr s 1 w \ fa "�' yy 9 41111p1" r` Ar,.. . . . r ,, .. . IAor -,,,,, ,...... ,_ • 0 \ • i ,... ...Ill, 1 . e _. r ' ' '- . . _ - . --- - ii,,,,... 1 11/ , ... ..... , i i r .i. . _____ i„,\ i, , , ! .. , ,.... ....„. fib . 1 I _ .....- . - . ."\ 0 -, , 0 0 V .m.. 'Ir'''' ''' ---' \'''''''' ' '-' --:: , il' '''- '11?-4.1-..„,„t------ 1 ' ---7'''''' ''' : 'hj*"'-' _'''-'41ii:l--;--1-',,-n-',--:':1!2P:--':7::;''' \ 0 • 0 \ 0 zt 1111111111.0.1 ''17.*11114r Ii 1 L $01/1111111•18119. . 6- 'wilt if 0 Reynobond Reynolux .x r AIL is • -1%, r colorwelc 500 Architectursl Finishes The colors of Reynobond and Reynolux; with the industry's first 30-year finish warranty ALCOA excellence in innovation • Reynobond & Reynolux standarc architectural finishes Reynobond Aluminum Composite Material and Reynolux metal wall panels and flat sheet are protected and colored with enhanced, high-performance Colorweld®500 coatings—allowing for color matching between products. These finishes feature 70% Kynar 500`x!Hylar 5000' polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) resins with Fluoropolymer technology, coil coated to ensure the highest color uniformity and quality. They provide excellent flexibility and film adhesion for forming and offer superior resistance to humidity, impact, salt spray, pollution and abrasion. With a 30-year finish warranty, Colorweld 500 coatings exhibit outstanding color and gloss retention and improved hardness and durability, and they are considered the premier architectural coatings for metal. Colorwelc . 500 SERIES ONE Standard Finishes An Reynobond colors are srccked in 62°-wide coil.Ask about 50"-wde cod avatlabiI ty. Call for avadabdrty of matching Reynoidx colors on 0.040"x 18. widths.Other gauges and eldths available upon request with mvdmrmr quantities and charges. For other Revnglr,x industry Pure White' Bone White Frisco White' Oyster White' standard"cion stocking`colors, check for availability. Castle Grey' Pueblo Tan' Cadet Grey' Classic Green` • Konig Blue' Brite Red' Classic Bronze Deep Black 11111 Colorweld 500 SERIES TWO Premium Mica Finishes Serres Two anodic colors are formulated to c osely resemble popular anodized colors used on curtain wail profiles.Certain c>7lors am gauge and width specific. When estimating, fabricating and erecting, the appearance of a Pewter Platinum` Silversmith' Vancouver Copper' mica paint finish may vary according to the direction from which it 111 is viewed.For color consistency,it is best to order all material required at one time and in the same width. Anodic Clear' ,Modic Satin' Anodic Bronze' Colorweld 500XL SERIES THREE Premium Metallic Finishes When estimating, fabricating and erecting, t the appearance of a 'g*17 ,,, metallic paint finish may # z= vary according to the direction from which it is viewed.For color . 2461.41,. „ consistency,it is best Bright Silver Metallic` Champagne Metallic' Copper Penny' Titanium' to order all materiel required at one time and in the same width. Opaque Finishes:These 2-coat finishes typically consist of a 0.2 mil primer and a 0.8 mil color coat, for a nominal dry film thickness of 1.0 mil. Mica Finishes:These 2-coat finishes typically consist of a 0.2 mil primer and a 0.8 mil color coat with mica flakes suspended in the finish,for a nominal dry film thickness of 1.0 mil. • Metallic Finishes:These 3-coat finishes typically consist of a 0.2 mil primer, a 0.8 mil color coat and a 0.5 mil clear top coat, for a nominal dry film thickness of 1.5 mils. Colors and patterns shown are as close to actual colors as possible wthm the hmtatons at commercel printing reproduction. Please consult your Alcoa Arc'itectural Products Reoresentative for product samples. E^wronment•friendly cool-pigment finen. IIIPaint Finish Performance Property Test Method Opaque Mica Metallic Specular Gloss(60%) ASTM D523 25-35 25-35 25-35 Pencil Hardness ASTM 03363 F-2H F-2H F-2H Flexibilty(T-bend) ASTM D4145 0-2 T-bend; No pick off 0-2 T-bend: No pick off 0-2 T-bend: No pick off Reverse Impact ASTM D2794 No cracking or No cracking or No cracking or adhesion loss adhesion loss adhesion loss Salt Spray Resistance ASTM B117 Passes 4000 hrs Passes 4000 hrs Passes 4000 hrs 5%Salt Fog @95'F Humidity Resistance ASTM 02247 Passes 4000 hrs Passes 4000 hrs Passes 4000 hrs 100%RH(g.95`F Color Retention ASTM D2244 Max 5 fade Max 5 fade Max 5 fade 10 yrs iti)45',South Ronda Chalk Resistance ASTM D4214 Max 8 chalk Max 8 chalk Max 8 chalk 10 Yrs rcil 45', South Florida Colorwelc.r 500 standard,Colorweld'500 Mica and Colorwed`500XL Metallic coatings exceed AAMA 2605 performance requirements. All coatings are thoroughly tested and backed by the strength and integrity of Alcoa.Alcoa Architectural Products Colorweld 500 and Colorweld 500XL coatings come with a 30-year finish warranty. Please consult factory for warranty information. It is extremely important to note that all mica and metallic finishes exhibit coil-coating grain flow and paint directionality.This is a result of the coil-coating process and the inherent optical diffusion and reflection caused by the mica and metallic flakes in the paint. A consistent panel layout, relative to the directional arrows on the protective film of each Reynobond'panel,must be taken into consideration during design, fabrication and installation, M Irradiative Readings Colorweld 500 SRV' SRI" LRV"t Colorweld 500(Mica) SRVt SRI" LRVf" Pure White 68.1 81 75 Pewter 19.3 15 21 Bone White 68.2 82 75 Platinum 51.8 58 54 Frisco White 69 83 75 Silversmith 50.2 57 31.6 • Oyster White 63 74 67 Vancouver Copper 37.1 39 30 Castle Grey 48.1 54 41 Anodic Clear 56 65 54 Pueblo Tan 51.1 58 48 Anodic Satin 49.6 57 40 Cadet Grey 33.3 35 35 Anodic Bronze 35.2 38 22 Classic Green 27 25 9 Colorweld 500XL(Metat icl Konig Blue 32.2 32 9 Bright Silver Metallic 70.6 80 64 Brite Red 34.8 35 9 Champagne Metallic 52.8 53 53 Classic Bronze 9 3 6 Copper Penny 39 41 27 Deep Black 4.5 0 5 Titanium 51.1 51 31.7 t5olar Reflectivity Value(SRV) ttSolar Reflective Index(SRI) tttt fight Reflectance Value(LRV) Colorweld is a registered trademark of Alcoa Architectural Products.Kynar 500`6 a registered trademark 0'Arkema Group. Rylar 5000'is a registered trademark of Solvay Soluxis.Colors and patterns shown are as close to actual colors as possible MVC ria.normals mix within the limitaticxts of commercial printing reproduction.This puo(^ation is basest on the latest data available at toe time of FSC ........ printing,t>:e to product changes,improvements and other factors,Alcoa reserves the right to change or withdraw mmfOat+ar "" FSC coma container.herein without prior notice.Contact Alcoa Architectural Products for material samples, Availability subject to change. For mom information, availability and Design Line product Alcoa Architectural Products 41111 offerings, visit website or contact your Alcoa Architectural Products representative. 50 Industrial Boulevard Eastman.GA 31023-4129 Tel.800 841 7774 Qreynobond,corn or reynoltmc.r txn ALCOA 02012 Alcoa ArcNtectwal P'ooxts.S''nd•sea I1nokA'we regetereo t'adernawee r}t Alcoa Inc. AAP-0555-Rev....anuary 2012 ver.1.0 20000 DIVISION 7 FABRAL SILHOUETTE HCF SERIESTM 92012 BRIEF PRODUCT SPECIFICATION _ �r �w � s .� k'14s / ill-- iftlio. V ---�.�.- �----ate ..�_ _,. .�.._.._ { 1• r . To0000000000,, .-3 # . lag ti "For the design of this elementary school project, we needed to visually break '" up the facade. The HCF Series gave us more color options and the flexibility to integrate color in the design.- "- " Gary D='Ns,Dins Architects CONCEALED FASTENER WALL PANEL FABRAL SILHOUETTE HCF SERIES' Fabral Silhouette HCF SerlesT'`-1. a horizontal concealed fastener system. You challenge us. provlces a range of profiles and configurations for architectural. commercial And we like it. and industrial applications. With options of one to four ribs and multiple profiles. Your vision for a building architects and designers have at their disposal the ultimate in design versatility and what you want to in a strong, durable wall panel. An interlocking sidelap feature hides fasteners achieve makes us think harder. It'd be easy to and is installed with or without clips to allow for thermal movement. say - That won't work. Instead we go with-Let's 1_ r_____ see what we can do. r— r— I ) ,—_ Fabral.com I 800.884.4484 I 1: L 4 • r .1 -!.,-:- f:-. ,_c,,i .. 12-1 12-1C 12-2 12-2C 12-3 12-3C16-1 16-1C 16-2 16-2 16-4 6-4C P. -- _ -- - ort reverse) FABRAL • DIVISION 7 FABRAL ILHOUETTE HCF SERIESTM 92012 BRIEF PRODUCT SPECIFICATION MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION • Fabral 308 Alabama Blvd. Jackson, GA 30233 • Telephone:800.884.4484 • Email: sales€fabral.com • Website:www.fabral.com PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Acceptable Product: Fabrala'HCF Horizontal Wall Panel Air Infiltration: ASTM E283 0.01 cfm/ft'@ 20 psf Water Penetration: ASTM E331 No water leakage CP 20 psf Structural Performance: ASTM E330 WIND UPLIFT LOAD TABLE (PSF) Substrate Spans 2.-0" 2'-6" 3'-0" 3'-6" 4'-0" 24 ga. Steel 3 54 48 43 38 33 22 ga. Steel 3 60 53 48 42 37 .032"alum. 3 48 42 36 30 24 DESIGN INFORMATION • Puffin Spacing:Maximum—4'on-center • Field Curving:Minimum radius 200' • Panel Length:Maximum-20' • Panel Width: 12", 16" PRODUCT INSTALLATION Install panels plumb.level and straight so it is watertight and without waves or other distortions,allowing for thermal movement considerations.Apply sealant tape or caulking as necessary at flashing and panel joints to prevent water penetration. PRODUCT MAINTENANCE AND WARRANTY Fabral"provides a 20 year paint-finish warranty for cracking,chipping, peeling,fading and chalking—providing confidence In a long- lasting application. To ensure the durability of your Silhouette HCF panels,use proper care. Remove filings,grease,stains,marks or excess sealants from roof panels system to prevent staining.Store panels and flashings in a safe,dry environment. RECENT PROJECTS TO REFERENCE Segment Project Name Location Quantity Architect/Distributor Healthcare Hand and Microsurgery Associates Columbus,OH Trinity Healthcare Group Office Building Landmark Office Building Wake Forest. NC N.B. Handy Co Education Georgia Tech CNES Lab Austell,GA 95 sq Abrams Architectural Products, Inc. Education Lebanon Middle School Lebanon. NH 161 sq Palace Construction. Inc. 4110 S98-32-418 , 2 ,.,,,,, \ .,,,. ,,...., ., _,,:, ,,, 41° Reynobond ' .. Architecture ---":---- ..,.‘ \� tfr -77. 1011 -W } P AIJTInum Co nsosite Vatehal r ALCOA Dedicated to your Success .,.- 0 \ 4 I. ,iprioelk - - - , ,, iiik i , Aidy _ ....„------- ..v,(4, i4aligis. — . . . _ . , !Ai • a -- ,.......... -------------- imS" ... , - H -- , • , tf----- . , 17_I I 1 . t. • fillan O Mil ,..,_ ..." I ... I AVM • > IIIIIIIN Mik.--- 1/k. 411116 AF 31ki . , N VILI 4-tz ' ' rfA riiiiiiirnrg ,...,.., q ik. 1 i Cl) CI) Co I kl I E i Er'1 0 i I 0 ,..i € i -el ;,2 i. ? -g HP 3 I t— t i "a g i. i . 11. 1111 ! ; !0 ! - 0 f lig I r i flit 0 : g1 iiii Iglati ! i 1 ! ct6 ; CI r r 1 i. sl 8 1 1 ill 8116. 6fr §. I i 0 "ei 15 1 g. 0 0'. -12t P .1) i - i •r ,ivi g eft ., t 1 § 6, * i 1: g 9" S i • b t 04 CO ! tiR C 0 .'i -. 11 vt / g1 1 III iiiii >I t3 m 0 0 2 CC 0 0 ''.4,....i.f...,„ VIIIMMMIle-== ! ; 1,-F 1 1 t ? 41 1 ;gig iiiEl 11 -i4! ,g, lizilp 11 .L., 1-6 ,8 . .1 .14 ; 1 .g 1 „ flrAil v'ill -g ! i ' 61' 1i, :19lg I ''.- fiVg ! I :,,, _ . f 4. W , 1 - lli i asa A 'fig . ? F MNXVii!.`q t & 1111111 1111111 z -41 M 1141F. q h 1 , __,,,,,,,,t% \ * jilem - 4' .4i; e t‘lr, 1 ..._ 111111 11111 -til Eo / 111111 �2.li ; 58 l'1 ; 1 illiiit _i__, $ to i E iiilii t .8, 'Ig3 2712gi 181 ,i ' l / t' Z ''' Z 'c'' 'E. g. 114 ; F 6 c ' c . f3 g' > I a 3 8 O ,0 c 1111r 0 c Il 0 100 iiim, vow, ..ga ry r a �� ..� max, Ili _ „.......,_ , tt II t 1 41111 \ - --,- ----- z ti 1 142 il U o x � u k ? 4 0 1 s" m ~ t ro C N F N N 3 y Q z 9 N Q 't'd i 2t W D C s .-,- i - u 1 V t 7.g Y0 NHt 0 T2 .2. 22g , it' wq 5 . I g 1 fl C _ o 8 g o N o �y� m LL4515 .§ t. ¢ m ¢ a ¢ CZ Q ¢ ¢ E 1 i All it EES { 11 11 ii gl EF-71 I ! ri ti E C g gi s 3 3 a C C oo^ ^o^ o ft0 CC ff o N 0 E rr rr 0 a fib 0 . 11 Iiiiii a „ 26 0 5 r , flig _ 1111118 12 $ go 2E v.@¢ m v E21. ti ito t ix I d ? Uzi - E g ii ' 41 r'21gili1 a 5 S S : ' i 2 A ! W> f., 1 o S{fig li 1.1 7.3 I t g s g B W gi s Fs y R a3 ; kill ! P � s IPIEi 11111i`i r, 1. !,, ,lit ?.. z 2 liii 1 lrIV iii1/10 i Wl $ 665 O i ! Ca � o _c Q p s _ 0 0L- M . _ 0 C D 04— CCU) I • V . 10g 4 3 i i i i i • R • < o cp m E,' Vm E" 31 il P I di oict �i K 1751 Ai ! PtRic 1 Ig FEEEEE Ei Eh ik kk iii i Rh6h n ^RP P N Vf lP f'. g'N D o cip I Ai i I ! i fi 1 1 I oi oi oi ii i ! H. hhhJo a 1 p • li r4n '7: .4' ! 17' '-!: if ii 7i ' .!.; Fi: II ;1 4 ,15 g i �_ �, o ° c h yBe i ma o> �^ b a P g ! a i «1 Y R C ! 4 i i � 4] v: O I $ Pi 1 T i,. !o• S o o o 1 1 i IsOma 06 E m ..I c b '2., o, 211(111 !� - 3 . S - , �l 8f . -'__ i e Y g R o" c-r -.gym � M1 c'�.� m gg g � 8 C) ill 1 Piiir i ,,_ I g I sA.,- t; ti 1 ! it- ! ! g::, t'. !I qkg 6 s Wiliii -0 r ,• 7HPIII1 o 1 , li i '11 a , is I A 1 ii 6 II.!_!In111111111 _J ! PII rf 0 / u 13 0 I / _ U CO a CCS a / ..3.„',''':-:!;;;i ' a 0 .. A'' E 03u N, ,i,,,,,,„...„ ,, ., . , met - A . f 0-, -` 01 t 0 i ., :„„. i ,it--' J 4• .,„.. ..., .._ FAli ?cc - ., 1 :g'.,ei. :... .,.. .!a ; ,i.., ...t imij1 C : a= _; , 1 3 i I 1 1 pril‘ 4 G cal 0 o • _c) I- 0 Q c W III Igiae, S Ilk ,.._. leak allik ,,. llik I 1 .rte , x llik . • . �' may_ ormwmanomow .momm • .0M.101•110 MiliMML ema.soom iii 11116, r. Awilmemem. ...ors co m 406t1 d c f .p ili c x � H 0 8 1 ICA 2rge Es _a _ ttpNo a i ViIi p I 'lL ID ! A rot 9, ffl g *sw v a a w • 12i ° Fig t2 . . -Bog Oi '�-'' 3 g v E ¢ S LC 0 iiia s. E -ss % Ts ? .kt � ka • ,,A. a i r_ ui G i = q ESI gyp . a °a , 'd .i .., 2= ::6EK '-' ,. - t "` E _°o3 ' infl6 ill E 111.:,_ BB jiU ! Ih u ; ; ._,„,-"* 2; 21 3 p 4�• Hmm sc m $ 2W 3 Q _ •+B .n w 3 +� v4. 0 E 5 O R: It m t ......i' v. : N, _ P r i mi ,.mows Aill:P I hi1 ! !: ? 2 i lily ififfi c ® � 8 g � �f ls 1 ig ? Q f 2. i � § 9 ` 13 % 2 s m a = o 7 LL 2 .N 6 m j a 3 D 2 El,, T 1 1 t 1 ,,. 1: ,) t i .-0 2 ga , -I, g '- 1: 'F., i g c i, 11 8 O w % a• c y C vfi w E 0• -0* C dymo Y • a D • + o € g r O COE li 20 ; 2 E c s p 3 ¢ o # a C 7 C To > U (CD� 3 c E 1 aa c o t.l.. .E 7, a c a` 3 H .$ u 0 ....C.--- '- - itifilitiviss. . - —— .,—..o.o14. .. Ns. . AP- 4 27 : ' ,.........116 . ---•..." ., —' . -.... 4 • ...Mar.. la 0 4. 11 7.--...,;:;::::-:----- ---,aro— -- - A li _ - loft—. ....... ...., Ili _ .. ...........x.77,_ ........ -- 0 lilt .. . _ . .. . . _ _, ,. ..„.,„,.... .........,_. , ...„ ..,... t' --:---- -- - -- ' ' •-, - - - --- -...."......_ _ - - __ i .„.. - ________ _ .-----...„ .._ ., ..... ilkillit „ ,_ -------„,--_--...-____------- >• a) LI .. 2 t' !I vi a 1 or co t I 13 2 ,ii -C I 2 X 1g ij ,211 i _ g g B 2 0 .5 6 0 -§6. g 2 1 3 a g a 6 E f 2 u a ti i — = 6 g -6 4, z 1 i -; 6 F Z• I: 5 CCi =A 0 f, 4-, z 2 ls a g a s . t1u — E. I I.V,_ .1, g F. 0 A to, § t -2 o • C ..0 a u t § g ; a `7.. 04' 5 g i 2 .c — o 6 —.c. .1_ .1. 1 c: z .0.g 1 2.,,:.54, 12 ..8,,,,i i i , 0 I, ' 7. t .6. 0 c I E E . E It 1 2 ,.? ! k- v i--- 15 4 t o F SE ,gs N. 0 ' E ; 2 2 z i o t - t 8. C -e- I ,,- t 3 'F'', g g 2 i e " Ct.) E '2 og• *2 1 1 i CC ..$. pbt. ...42 VRAti Fcpt3 pgag 02i £ n " m N p .85 I m - 5 +a * c_' to 7, "8 m a t 9 9 i C r., 2 _$ -.. m m q7,0o CV 91 O 'ipJ .X,, ` O h C WI Pt C ,.. i U i p L O • 5 1 C S § ; a qty o E m 3g l • 1 m a 4 5 3 c% p iDO 'a x ''' g g c ECJ E Y ct , g -gy c E p £ t m b o '& o b li . "i , g -+ `cam 3 8 D 2 T. ,- ¢i g 3 -°, a Q , C 0 o7j C .. 1 a) cc • r . % ¢ p y ii gg' I . Yli ? -2. .i sigs, cp 1,1 ,11g o n 1 m a3 g e .g _ . v a 3 .5117, l I e g y c ? 3"i c 2^ -8 _v It !' t ffi ��ii o 4 Y § • p _ 7 ux .gd ergrr gyp[ g p lac m r 2 p M 'p 3 3 l nii Q ,.° 112 c La 9 C m > ,i _ a � g Y..CC z ; m 3Qc' cm 8 .. t0 3 5 !t 3 3 0 .0 - c ?' 8 8 c c P t0 g o a s g ! 8 t Pu $ ' E8p.. r 5. g o .% a 9 3 . Y O c a 4 05 -Ci 04 - �, 0 -C C Q Q� rnO m F 10 N IRI ' • _ '' g ! 1 (�' N N N EE RE iv, iEER iEECp oEC 8 p' 4 b E E c cAt! E F F E Ri LL 9 $ C O 1 1 & 2 ,n ,gym ..m m -m 02 2 m a FF 1 o i A a P =pFEENEE EE FE rig 9 �1 4¢ 2q'E�ry Q .. NN N� NN NN i V fl n SI i t ¢ ^4 °Q Q °Q -0 Of a Y $ m J 1 d f i (73 . I Li li 14i i i as ' f 1 1: I i i i' I o $ S d • i4 O c u PI 8, .O ' b O_ O S Y _ K $ III SSRR �t{f, JJ11 RR Q g'8 g '4 S a.`• �' ' y�' g n8c' 8`3 dlo Zc{ �M ' S 6{,a F l li ls6 Q o. Q_ b oF .;1:1-1 5 S �J- c rill ° dpp - y so5 � oS~ - r s oo 9 t5; t. o" n ' ' I CO iT3 . 7,12.10 1 O Am m ifll• 5 F+ 111" 4 b I 0 —0 GSY nIW i i 1a. W 60 !!SS o Ii.iii!kI b 1 i 6 3 z t r • .40 Trebilcock planning•nnpin®erinu' Traffic Impact Statement Porsche of Naples Site Development Plan Amendment (SDPA) • Collier County, FL 04/01/2016 Prepared for: Prepared by: J.R. Evans Engineering, PA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 9351 Corkscrew Road,Suite#102 1205 Piper Boulevard,Suite 202 Estero, FL 33928 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-405-9148 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee—$ 500.00 Collier County Transportation Review Fee—Small Scale Study—No Fee • Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 I • Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. 40111 i u,,, 's TRFeet , ,,• PN , •' 0 00 ?: \,` 0o =2: No 47116 .�� • *; * * :"›).:• � STATE OF : � 41) 1.0 •isc<l' ... o• Norman J.Trebilcock,AICP, P.E. FL Registration No.47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard,Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 12 I Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • Table of Contents Project Description 4 Trip Generation 5 Trip Distribution and Assignment 6 Background Traffic 9 Existing and Future Roadway Network 9 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network Link Analysis 10 General Transportation Considerations 11 Site Access Turn Lane Analysis 13 Improvement Analysis 15 Mitigation of Impact... 15 APPENDICES • Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan 16 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist(Methodology Meeting) 18 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition 26 Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits 30 • li Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 13 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 i Project Description The Porsche of Naples development is a proposed luxury automobile sales center located in east Naples on the north side of Davis Boulevard (SR 84),just west of Airport-Pulling Road. The project has a street address of 3147 Davis Boulevard. The project is approximately 2.16 acres in size and it is located in Section 2,Township 50 South, Range 25 East, in Collier County, Florida. Refer to Fig. 1—Project Location Map, below, and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Fig. 1—Project Location Map p,. _ i t Y' as%� r 'u n: ; It ' !r , . a. to aiiii :f.4711 twM.:- ::,,`:„ i' 'r, ,4 ''''','"v:', `,, '7'''''' „t -: , 7 V I * .ic(1,4,,'; 1 '* •' iif f.fr ' � y � `� *� �` PRO,�CT e,.. u � T i a �`'«yA d 'v.1 n III ik, 3k „;,.7.","I:. ,” 1„ 3�iie� > 3' Ttla1i F �F' Sap,1 t Y --:-.7. y? }3 ft 4 t ry` 4 .. � T a * ��' r [ r}_ r `s 4 rte rt�w �.. W I* , op,c ,, , , k .e y c Mr r «. y 0..t:.... „,,,:,g $ kernl , - a it4.r*°-4,,,,;tti,'”4,,,; ',11,.:4:1:::,1.7:'-'15;:,;.;::,'„ —x,:' '.:41}''',1A-44ii:1%:‘:; —- ' - '' . ° The site has an existing 12,850sf building and parking lot that was used as a luxury automobile sales dealership (reference Table 1A, next page). This Site Development Plan Amendment (SDPA) proposes to remodel the existing building to a 31,123sf automobile dealership and add a 16,973sf parking garage. The parking garage is considered incidental to the automobile dealership and is not included in traffic generation calculations. • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 14 it Porsche of No pies-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • Table 1A Existing Approved Development Program Development Land Use ITE Land Use ITE Land Use Code Total Size Commercial Automobile Sales 841 12,850sf The proposed Porsche of Naples project will be developed as a luxury automobile dealership as shown in Table 1B, below. Table 1B Proposed Development Program Development Land Use ITE Land Use ITE Land Use Code Total Size Commercial Automobile Sales 841 31,123sf A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on November 3,2015,via email, as illustrated in Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist. For purposes of this evaluation, the project build-out year is assumed to be consistent with the • Collier County 2018 planning horizon. Connections to the site are currently provided via one right-in/right-out access onto westbound Davis Boulevard and two full movement accesses onto eastbound Terrace Avenue. As part of this application, the project proposes to relocate the existing driveway on Davis Boulevard and one of the two existing driveways on Terrace Avenue. Trip Generation The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition and the software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, Version 4.0.2). The ITE rates and equations are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition. The new proposed SDPA total project trip generation is illustrated in Table 2A. The trip generation analysis based on existing approved conditions is shown in Table 2B. The projected net new trip generation (Table 2C) shows total proposed versus existing conditions (the difference between Table 2A and Table 2B). • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page IS Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • Based on ITE recommendations and Collier County Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)guidelines, no reductions for internal capture or pass-by trips have been taken into consideration. Table 2A Trip Generation(Proposed SDPA Conditions)—Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Way Volume ITE Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Automobile Sales 31,123sf 1,005 45 15 60 33 50 83 The site access turn lane analysis is calculated based on the SDP build-out external trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hour(as shown in Table 2A). Table 2B Trip Generation (Existing Approved Development)—Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Way Volume ITE Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Automobile Sales 12,850sf 415 19 6 25 19 29 48 Table 2C Trip Generation(Projected Net New Traffic)—Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Way Volume Development Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Proposed SDPA 1,005 45 15 60 33 50 83 Existing Approved 415 19 6 25 19 29 48 Net New Traffic 590 26 9 35 14 21 35 Increase(Decrease) For the purpose of this TIS, the surrounding roadway network link concurrency analysis is analyzed based on projected PM peak hour net new traffic generated by the project (refer to Table 2C). Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic generated by the development was assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area,and as coordinated with Collier County Transportation Planning staff. I • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 16 Porsche of Naples-SOPA—TIS—April 2016 • The assignment of the net new proposed site-generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour and is graphically depicted in Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour CC AUIR Distribution PM Peak Hr Project Roadway Link Link ID# Roadway Link Location of Project Traffic Vol.* Traffic Enter Exit Davis Blvd 12 0 Tamiami Trail East to 30.0% EB—4 WB—7 (SR 84) Airport Rd Davis Blvd 13.0 Airport Rd to 20.0% WB—3 EB—4 (SR 84) Lakewood Blvd Airport Rd 5.0 Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 25.0% 5B—4 NB—5 (CR 31) Airport Rd6 0 Davis Blvd to 25.0% NB—4 SB—5 (CR 31) Tamiami Trail East Note(s): *Peak hour,peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. i r Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 17 1 Porsche of Noples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • Fig. 2—Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour �; y . l' PROJECT TRIP ip .-.....'%---,, b.i., .: , M: DISTRBUTION MAP BY I ' - PERCENTAGE t © �' x .n ✓ 0......,- .. . ' }y /t ,?..,,::?e'.., ;� 1'.NM-1:4" :':#!"."w-', ad N'1(k�"'�i'" -y - "aiiiNar.t . •�' NI 3 w "' k v l — 4,J.-4.-.4 v zits if , ' • 'y$t � 30% ' '''47m4-11"'•-r''.4.'�' 20% ,., fa a�� i • �_ � x � � 11„ •••..."-;0011.p, ' • ..r '� P 111,4 11%/it ii&aed ' .1.' it 1 Id T III ` t: s."4 :-.,,,.:457.1_,161;1,.,..v.:0,._:.. ....[�sfaa 5l Ami t , . „ PROJECT TRIP V '': t ' 4 _._._.; 7 DISTRBUTION MAP BY r PM PEAK HOUR .h 3 'zr.k.'4r ENTER-4,EXIT-5 ..,4.„.;‘. • ,ti ,� Y d , ,. -,,,,,,ty,, 3rn is b *, ss., .10 pa' 1.,, tr }+�hiv w,vE�!;PRO.ECT . { :14'.y+"-'7" S , -t b yogi!.,1 ;444:. '^f. .t,tiiy, '.- 4.4,...,..:.•-v.id v 1G a i 't # . ys4 4i,‘, •'Er ENTER-4, EXIT-7 ,s 10 ENTER-4,EXIT 5 6 ro F ,. i . -' ENTER 3 EXIT-4 t ki ),, .•V Page i 8 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA • Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • Background Traffic Future projected background traffic volumes are calculated based on approved growth rates and trip bank volumes for the segments of the roadway network in the study area, as shown in Collier County 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). The higher of the two determinations, is to be used in the Roadway Link Level of Service analysis. Based on Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance, a minimum of 2%growth rate is considered. Table 4 illustrates the projected background peak hour peak direction traffic volume(without project)for the future build-out year 2018. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project(2015-2018) 2015 AUIR Projected 2018 Projected 2018 Projected CC Pk Hr,Pk Dir Traffic Pk Hr,Peak Dir Pk Hr,Peak Dir Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Background Trip Background Traffic Volume Traffic Volume Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor Bank ID ti Volume Rate w/out Project w/out Project (trips/hr) (%/yr)* (trips/hr) (trips/hr) Growth Factor** Trip Bank*** Davis Blvd 12 0 Tamiami Trail East 1,480 2.0% 1.0612 1.571 14 1,494 • (SR 84) to Airport Rd Davis Blvd 13.0 Airport Rd to 1,520 2.0% 1.0612 1.613 0 1,520 (SR 84) Lakewood Blvd Airport Rd Radio Rd to 0 (CR 31) 5.0 Davis Blvd 2,000 2.0% 1.0612 2,122 14 2,014 Airport Rd6 0 Davis Blvd to 1,610 2.0% 1.0612 1,709 6 1,616 (CR 31) Tamiami Trail East Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate—from 2008-2015 AUIR,or 2%minimum. **Growth Factor=(1+Annual Growth Rate)^3.2018 Projected Volume=2015 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2018 Projected Volume=201S AUIR Volume+Trip Bank. The projected 2018 Peak Hour—Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation,which is underlined and bold as applicable. Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2015 Annual Update and inventory Report (AUIR). Future projected roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5- Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program(CIP)are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements are identified in the Collier County 2015 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build-out. The existing and projected future • roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 1 9 Porsche of Naples-SOPA—175—April 2016 • Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Exist Peak Dir, Future Roadway Link CC AUIR Roadway Link Exist Standard Peak Hr Project Link ID# Location Roadway LOS Capacity Build out Volume Roadway Davis Blvd Tamiami Trail East to (SR 84) 12.0 Airport Rd 6D E 2,700(EB) 6D Davis Blvd 13.0 Airport Rd to 4D D 2,000(EB) 4D (SR 84) Lakewood Blvd Airport Rd 5.0 Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 6D E 2,800(NB) 6D (CR 31) Airport Rd Davis Blvd to (CR 31) 6.0 Tamiami Trail East 6D E 2,700(SB) 6D Note(s): 2U=2-lane undivided roadway;40,6D,8D=4-lane,6-lane,8-lane divided roadway,respectively;LOS=Level of Service. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project • impacts to the area roadway network in the future. The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links, and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at year 2018 future conditions. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service, illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the studied roadway network. • bil Consulting PA P a a I 10 Tre cock Solutions, g Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service(LOS)—With Project in the Year 2018 2015 Peak Roadway 2018 Peak %Vol. Min LOS Min LOS CCAUIR Dir,Peak Link,Peak Dir,Peak Capacity exceeded exceede Roadway Roadway Link Dir,Peak Hr Link ID HrHr Volume Impact without d with Link Location Project Capacity Volume w/Project By Project? Project? Volume Added* ** Project Yes/No Yes/No Davis Blvd 12 0 Tamiami Trail East 2,700(EB) EB—4 1,575 0.15% No No (SR 84) to Airport Rd Davis Blvd Airport Rd to (SR 84) 13.0 Lakewood Blvd 2,000(EB) EB—4 1,617 0.20% No No Airport Rd5 0 Radio Rd to 2,800(NB) NB—5 2,127 0.18% No No (CR 31) Davis Blvd Airport Rd6 0 Davis Blvd to 2,700 SB—5 1,714 0.19% No No (CR 31) Tamiami Trail East (SB) Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2018 Projected Volume=2018 background(refer to Table 4)+Project Volume Added. General Transportation Considerations • Davis Boulevard (SR 84), Collier County ID#12, link from Tamiami Trail to Airport-Pulling Road is a six-lane, west-east divided major arterial roadway under Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) jurisdiction. This segment of SR 84 has an Access Management Classification of 5 with a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. The established spacing standard is 245 ft. between driveway connections, 660 ft. for directional median openings, and 1,320 ft.for full median openings and signals. The existing driveway on SR 84 does not meet driveway connection spacing, and it is desired to be brought into reasonable compliance given the unique site conditions. A meeting with FDOT staff was held on November 23, 2015. Based on discussions at this meeting, it was acknowledged that FDOT would only consider a non-conforming connection somewhere near the center of the property's frontage on Davis Boulevard. This location has currently approximately 205 ft. from the adjacent driveways and would be considered a reasonable compromise for a non-conforming connection location. At the time of the meeting, the project redevelopment proposed one access point providing 95 ft.± of connection separation to the existing driveway on the corner parcel at the Davis Boulevard and Airport Road intersection. As FDOT expressed concerns with safety and general operation of this driveway, the connection location was realigned to provide approximately Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 111 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • 160 ft. spacing to the eastern corner property driveway, and 200 ft.± spacing to the western properties access. It is expected that eastbound traffic wanting to access the dealership would make eastbound to westbound U-turns at the intersection of SR 84 and Airport-Pulling Road. The proposed driveway location accommodates a maneuver — weaving distance of approximately 245 ft. measured from the intersection's eastbound left turn STOP bar. In agreement with most current FDOT Median Handbook, Section 2.2.1, the suggested minimum decision distance for suburban conditions and 45 mph posted speed is 130 ft. A future Collier County roadway project on Airport-Pulling Road is scheduled to introduce a southbound to westbound right-turn lane to be constructed as a slip ramp under YIELD condition. In conclusion, based on these facts, the proposed driveway location on Davis Boulevard is a reasonable deviation to the FDOT driveway spacing standards and provides for generally safe traffic operations. Terrace Avenue is a two-lane east-west rural undivided local roadway under Collier County jurisdiction. Consistent with similar type roadways in the vicinity of this roadway, it is assumed to have a legal speed of 25 mph. The Porsche of Naples project proposes an automobile dealership with sales center,automotive servicing center and a vehicular storage garage. The different service areas have different levels of access including the general public, sales staff, maintenance staff and automotive shipping trucks. Collier County Resolution No. 13-257, as may be amended, establishes the adopted Collier County Access Management system for arterial and collector roadways. Consistent with the Collier County Access Management Resolution, Section 3.09.2.1, there should be no more than one connection per road frontage. Currently, the property has two driveway connections to Terrace Avenue, which the applicant wishes to retain. This project seeks relief from this resolution to instead allow the two existing driveway connections to Terrace Avenue to remain as adjusted. No additional driveway connections are requested as part of this SDPA — refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Of these two requested access points, only one will be open to the general public. This access point is the easternmost access point to the property on Terrace Avenue. The remaining one • access point is only accessible by Porsche employees. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 112 Porsche of Noples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • This project also seeks deviation from certain sections of the Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right-of-way, Collier County, as it pertains to the accesses along Terrace Avenue. A second deviation seeks relief from the Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right-of-way, Collier County,Section III.C.6.b.(2) which requires a minimum throat length of 50 ft., to instead allow for a minimum length of 30 ft. The requested throat length of 30 ft. is proposed for the gated ingress/egress along Terrace Avenue. The operation of the dealership is such that the vehicle storage area must be kept separate from the public necessitating the gates in this location (western access). Therefore, vehicles entering the site will be driven by Porsche employees that have the ability to space out the intervals in order to avoid vehicle stacking on Terrace Avenue. Therefore, no negative impacts are anticipated with this deviation. A third deviation seeks relief from the Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right-of-way, Collier County, Section III.C.6.c.(3) which requires that commercial gates provide a minimum throat length of 30 ft., measured from the right-of-way line to the face of the gate, to allow for a minimum length of 30 ft. to be measured from the nearest edge of pavement of the roadway to the face of the gate. As stated above, this entrance will be accessed by Porsche employees only, thereby eliminating concerns of vehicle stacking on • Terrace Avenue. Therefore, no negative impacts are anticipated with this deviation. • Site Access Turn Lane Analysis Access to the site is currently provided via one right-in/right-out connection onto westbound Davis Boulevard and two full movement connections onto eastbound Terrace Avenue. The project proposes to relocate the existing driveway on Davis Boulevard and rearrange the two existing driveways on Terrace Avenue as part of the Site Development Plan Amendment Application. For more details refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. The site access turn lane analysis is calculated based on the projected SDPA build-out trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hours(as illustrated in Table 2A). The estimated project trips at driveway locations are illustrated in Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits. Project Access—Davis Boulevard Based on the posted speed limit of 45 mph on Davis Boulevard in the vicinity of the project,the right-turning threshold volume for warranting a right-turn lane is 80-125vph, according to the FDOT Driveway Information Guide. The project is expected to generate 31 and 23vph • right-turning movements during AM and PM peak hour, respectively, which is below the Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 113 ' I I Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • threshold values. As such, a dedicated westbound-right turn lane is not warranted at this location. Project Accesses—Terrace Avenue The project accesses are evaluated for turn lane warrants based on the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook: (a) two-lane roadways — 40vph for right-turn lane/20vph for left-turn lane; and (b) multi-lane divided roadways — right-turn lanes shall always be provided;when new median openings are permitted,they shall always include left-turn lanes. Turn lane lengths required at build-out conditions are analyzed based on the number of turning vehicles in an average one-minute period for right-turning movements, and two-minute period for left-turning movements, within the peak hour traffic. The minimum queue length is 25 ft. and the queue/vehicle is 25 ft. For more details, refer to Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits. As previously noted, the western access is used by employees only, while the eastern connection onto the property is open to general public. Additionally, the adjacent parking lot to the west of the project may be leased by Porsche of Naples. This parking lot provides two full accesses onto eastbound Terrace Avenue. Based on a • 15-20% distribution of traffic for this location, dedicated right- and left-turn lanes are not warranted. The proposed site plan provides restricted traffic site connectivity, consistent with specific desired dealership operations. As such, internal traffic is expected to access Terrace Avenue in order to use vehicle service bays and/or the parking garage. As the western access is used by employees only, minimum traffic is expected in the AM and PM peak hours. For purposes of this analysis, the additional internal traffic accessing Terrace Avenue at the garage connection is assumed to be 15%, as illustrated in Appendix D. As such, a dedicated westbound left-turn lane is not warranted for the western access location. At the eastern access location, the project is expected to generate 7 and 5vph right-turning and left-turning movements during AM and PM peak hour, respectively, which is below the threshold values. As such, dedicated right- and left-turn lanes are not warranted at this location. • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 114 Porsche of Noples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 II Improvement Analysis Based on the roadway network link analysis results, the proposed project is not a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network traffic at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate proposed development generated trips without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Based on the site access turn lane analysis results, turn lanes are not recommended at project proposed accesses. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project. � I I Iii I ' i II, • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 115 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 1 1 0 I I I I I I I I Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan 1 (1 Sheet) 1 1 1 1 i I • 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 116 Porsche of Naples SDPA-TIS-April 2016 - • i + ---------------•- -'{ I. i i y : 1 • :II, II ' -_-- ' I ` ___.__._.__ ___�_--1--,� __ _ \\ --- ---r-J` al i�; I I I IIIP' _. I)* ' .� l S s,- I' _ t , ,, ,4JAV.:o'.-;' Al'i .,,,,,,,, l'ilb y.-)41 4151iiii. ,,,a;,,1"tin.r.4";t?-,'.,,,•41'4‘ ..'',z,41,1:," 4Y7',4t ''''z''-'''' ''',,f,-.1 /7.1-17.7- -111) . i 1. f� 'MI r : Aerf4,44,0,_,i,1,,,2,,,,..,„...,:,....:.,:,..,,,i,,,,,,,,, ,,,.,,,,,,tc„,:i,,,,,,,,t„,.* . -- _, ,, ,- — .4i , ,i,,,,,kr,„4.:::,. 4,..",,,--,10,.--..''..,..4,,,'..e,„„„?.;•*,t,,,,,,,-,-404,;tgki,i,,,,,,,-5,:i _----- --a „-14.42.!.'61--.,,,,_:„,i.:,,,,i,„...,,,,;41,i,:til, ,ili,„, ,,:;s4, .•,.,,;',,:,,,,,,,v,',4'.! 1144..,1,, ,t - `' .„v,„„,lik I �- f1. . - p"i V ,,dfk' k ` )t 1 +t t� r i�, s I, v t , I +s `a 3° t}1 �: Ii } 1 , '`. } 1,,, I pk,; y t, i '4, y �k ` '1st� 4 °m, � �: ` ira ¢�' • t � ' ' 375 „'.' kii1ti, ti 1 I uI{'6t �, .rx li @ice ® .dl''4'x.L. ::aTM', '�+ r I . I 9 0 9 t'':i.1;, ” N 14 as „:1-1--c---) O I O.6010, Id'!'r7 `ti i 1I fl i rP,�' � ..L: T� - Ni s , r�k4 - `f ° * jY�` ,!4'.�„tf� 6 j +rl` ('Viz. '' 1 04' k ,. C;�1[3 _ a x .1 .-tt1 �— - ;i {� r •1 °+: s a u ) °rt Ma,�piQ�Cr J rJ 3�, e W r k` :+x to Jti"'�`* ----(;), ' +pi $ia: `� -t�e, #r +,tk'7 7'tx� k + sw6a y '� ~� ! i wsti © r. C _4 • I T ie el9 _J 1, I 4 _� r y } k - . r1 Ei 11 � � z ill r. y � , I. i i '; , I i • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page l 17 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) (7 Sheets) • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 118 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply,or N/A(not applicable), Date: November 3,2015 Time: LA A Location:N/A—Via Email People Attending: Name,Organization,and Telephone Numbers 1) Stephen Baluch,Collier County Growth Management Division 2) Norman Trebilcock,TCS 3) Ciprian Malaescu,TCS Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title:Norman Trebilcock.AICP,PE Organization:Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Address&Telephone Number: 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202,Naples. Fl 34110:ph 239-566-9551 • Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name&Title:Stephen$aluch,PE Organization&Telephone Number:Collier County Transportation Planning Department 239-252-2361 Applicant: Applicant's Name:J.R.Evans Engineering.PA Address:9351 Corkscrew Road,Suite 102,Estero,FL 33928 Telephone Number:239-405-9148 Proposed Development: Name:Porsche of Naples—SDPA Location: on the north side of Davis Blvd. lust west of Airport-Pulling Rd. (refer to FIE.1).address 3147 Davis Blvd..Collier County Land Use Type:Approved/Proposed-Automobile Sales ITE Code ii: Approved-LUC 841 Description: Approved Maximum Existing Conditions — 12.850sf Automobile Sales; Proposed SDPA Conditions—49,205sf Automobile Sales. SDPA proposes to refurbish existing building and add a parking garage. To provide additional parking,the owner will lease 30 parking spaces from adjacent owners. Page 1 of 7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 119 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 Fig.1—Project Location Map r R _f 111 .2z,„„ r "ty�x 4 e Zuni Existing:C-5:("THUD-MXD Comprehensive plan recommendation:14/A Requested SDP approval for new development Findings of the Preliminary Study Study tvpe; Since pr jected net new PM project traffic is mare than 50 and less than 100 peak hour trips,this study qualifies for a Minor TIS—no sign utcard operational impacts with minimal roadway impacts and work within the county richt-of-way.The TIS will include concurrency analysis—PM peak hour trip distribution and traffic assignment, Operational site access turn lane analysis based on total external trios—AM/PM peak hour trip generation. No pass-by or internal capture will be considered for this study. Davis Blvd is under FDOT jurisdiction and Terrance Ave is a Collier County maintained ;oadway. Study Type: (if riot net increase,operational study) Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS I Major TIS El Page 2 of 7 • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 120 _ Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • Study Area: Boundaries: south—Davis Blvd.east—Airport Rd Additional intersections to be analyzed:N/A Build Out Year:2016 Planning Horizon Year:2018 Analysis Time Period(s):AM/PM Future Off-Site Developments:N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates:ITE 9th Edition Reductions in Trio Generation Rates: None:Nlg Pass-by trips:N/A Internal trips(PUD):NIA Transit use:IVA Other:NIA Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements:20I8 ietdodoloev&Assumptions: Non-site traffic estimates:Collier County traffic counts and/or 2015 AUIRS Site-trip generation: LUC 841—1TE 9th Edition Trip distribution method:engineer's estimate—refer to Fig,2,below Traffic assignment method:proiect trio generation with background growth Traffic growth rate:historical growth rate or 2%minimum Project Accesses: Davis Blvd.—westbound right in-right out,Terrace Ave.—two full movement accesses into parking areas,one full movement access into service bay and two full movement accesses into adjacent leased parking area west of project see Fie.3-Master Site Plan • on next nage and Fig 4—Turning Movements by percentage on nage 5, Fig.2--Protect Trip Distribution by Percentage , ¢ a ,,tom: `"x , DISTRBUTKfl5MAP 6Y * PERCENTAGE 14'„,- �r k � � T ,;::— .1`' -: y ,J a " k Y i �1r '��' ''- y *{�r:14 4,- _`.� uf..,N. },wig- #��3 , [i',;- 11,A4,-1,' # _ � ,1 r,,, Page 3 of 7 • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 121 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • Fig.3-Master Site Plan i ;1i • Lr=ctS "' I +3, 3 E 1cr.Iam — kf_ Mr Id ti ii _1_.1—. — y f.%; j, *T.— '''-'1 1*, psi"ilEza ........H1 i i �yy— IH 1 1 l (1 I1 r 1..11 l� c l 11 1 T11111 J -' t • SII I { 1 --,....i, rV"'Aas 4 "--.44:1-44Tv.„.::;Mrm " 14t a r • '. : .s 0:lig...,,,,; ,fit 1Cs , II 114i g � ' 1ç;is i Ili i ``t11i11111II 1111111111 , Page 4 of 7 • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 122 Porsche of Naples-SDPA–TIS–April 2016 • Fig. 4 Turning Movements by Percentage i o' 1 ' 11 ,3.m_. :1►5.. r f ill / il Q A1. l I 0 44F-1,44 041 C11 13- .:,,,-...,75.,11f .t,— . WM Ili 0ti 61FikI , -- I i ©r- 1"I .-rum' iI (1 ' i _ :del ' ie ir., 177" i I 1 ii I • Zmtu 01 �' El HLuz Z W LU CL 1I p0. cc 2 t+7 a 11 1 A —7 I Iog � �� • iiiiino 111111 — 11111 rE4 li r Page 5 of 7 0 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 123 Porsche of Noples-SDPA-TIS-April 2016 • ---- I Special Features:(from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations:N/A Sight distance:NIA Queuing:.N!A � g�_ I Access location&configuration:N/A Traffic control:)4UTCD Signal system location&progression needs:N/A i On-site parlting needs:N/A Data Sources:CC 2015 AUIR:CC Traffic Counts a Base maps:NA Prior study reports:NIA Access policy and jurisdiction:N/A Review process:N/A Requirements:N/A Miscellaneous: N/A Small Scale Study-No Fee Minor Study-$750.00 x +$500.00 Methodology Fee=$1,250.00 a Major Study-$1500,00 Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections-$500,00 each 3 4111 I Ail fees will be agreed to&ring the Methodology meeting and must be paid as Transportation prior to i oar sign-off on the application. I SIGNATURES i NOWot aka•Tr biI.Goale Study Preparer--Norman Trebilcock i Reviewer(s) 1 Applicant 1 Page 6 of 7 i • i 1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 124 Porsche of Naples-SOPA—TIS—April 2016 111) Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review,Analysis Review,and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. 1 Methodoloev Review-$500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement,including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study"determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement,and written confirmation of a re-submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County,if needed. "Small Scale Study"Review-No Additional Fee(Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review,the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation,distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review"-$750 Fee(Includes one sufficiency review2 Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes:optional field visit to site,confirmation of trip generation,distribution,and assignment,concurrency determination,confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off-site improvements within the right-of-way,review of site access and circulation,and preparation and review of"sufficiency"comments/questions. "Maior Study Review"-$1,500 Fee(Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency • reviews( I Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination,confirmation of committed improvements,review of traffic volume data collected/assembled,review of traffic growth analysis,review of off-site roadway operations and capacity analysis,review of site access and circulation,neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates,and preparation and review • of up to two rounds of"sufficiency"comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review"-$500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the"Major Study Review"and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the"Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews"-$500 Fee) Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 7 of 7 I ; • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 125 Porsche of Naples-SOPA—TIS—April 2016 • Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition (3 Sheets) • • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 126 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April2016 • 0 ovefact Mom Porsche ofNaies-Fol*ig No: 0 I 11412018 Cayc statWRereKw 210=41 Cede Caewy: COMM AMIE Mairirl Normae OAtlpet 118-7914 9hE6IOur I--__ Midway — UMPspiHaw lMMPask9gr Lard Lim ' etre _. Wry did! 1018YHmy i. �_dt__ Mt-Artame6M8dI8 �� 12.95W 209 207 T 19 8 11 29 neostkll - 0 0 0 0 0 0 women 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by 0 0 0 0 0 0 •isey 208 201 19 8 1s - 29 _ TOM _.208 207 19 1 19 20 Total n duo0on I 0 a 0 0 0 0 Tatal kteeui 0 0 0 0 0 0 Toga Paes4iy d b 0 0 a 0 TONINonfYs.Oy�...._........._.. 208 201.. ....._..._........_.19......�-.. 6 Y9 .._... 21 i i 7 'OW*Fell Coss Roo,Vs. Period Setting or Data provided by In Specify the independent Variable,Thne Period,,and Calculation Method to be used In the calculation ofthe number of Thps yenereted In the analyse.To record any notes,click re Add Notes above. Project Name: Porsche of Naples-Existing Analyse Name: !Weekday Land Use independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 4 841-Automobile Sales 1000 Sq.Feet Gross IQ! 12,85°", [Makin 4 f Avenge CT 32.3 208. 207 415 (o}indicates size out of range. Period Setting ,JData provided by ITE Speedy the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used In the calculation of the number of Trips generated In the analysis.To record any notes,eget 4 Add Notes above, Proiect Name Porsche of Naples-Exfa1Mg Analysis Name: [AM Peek Hour 1 I Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total at 841-Automobile Sales 11000 Sq.Feet Gross(]v 12.85 `Weekday.Peek Hour 1:1!Average Q 192 15 8 25 II • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 127 Porsche of Noples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 III J Period Setting `/ Data provided by ITE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated In the analysis.To record any notes,ctck*1 Add Notes above. Project Name: Porsche of Naples-Existing Analysis Name: 1PM PeakHour l' Land Use Independent Venable Sire Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Q 041-Automobile Sales 1000 Sq.Feet Goss J 1285 l Weekday,Peek Hourvl'Best Ft(LIN) Cite T=1.91(%)+23.74 19 29 48 Project Name: Pcrsdis of Napes•Proposed No: Dene: 30912018 City: StatelPrsnce: 33pIllossal Code: Cowley: Client Name: Analyst's Name Edition: ITE:TGIIA Ph Edeon NEEI.DAY I54 PEAK HOUR PM PEAKHOUR LANG USE SIZE Eriby Exit Entry twit Entry Exit 841-Automobee gales j 31.13'e' 509 502 45 .15 (+ 33 50 [eduction I 0 0 0 0 0 0 internal I 0 0 0 0 li 0 0 Pest.ly 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-pess-by 503 502 45 15 39 i 50 . Total i 503 502 d9 f5 33 60 Total Reduction0 0 0 0 0 0 TOW Internal 503 R 0 0 0 0 Total Pase4ry 0 0 9 0 0 ( 0 Tads Noa pricey 501 502 46 15 33 111 60 • i If 10 yi Fye!Gran RN),Pre4 3 PERIOD SETTING ,R DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis.To record any notes,click ei Add Notes above. F'Y:JL`-:T NAME F•'wr0-IFuti__< r r, t'`''� AN AI.f 9s WM!, 4We*� T_1 LAND USE MDEPENDENT SIZE TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE Q 841•Automobile Sales (1000 Sd Feet t• Q 31.13 (Weekday e�J Average Y Ell* 503 502 1006 • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 128 Porsche of Naples-SOPA—TIS—April2016 • PERIOD SETTING 4 DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis.To record any notes,click*4 Add Notes above. r��•.*'T lPME P3434...HE.rNAFi.rc- Pt-SE_i• NAME (AM Peak Hour LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE 841-Automobie Sales 1000 Sq Feet Grose 31.13 Weekday,Peak Hae Aveaee o1• 45 15 60 192 PERIOD SETTING DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis.To record any notes,click 10 Add Notes above .+1.4AI, PQP::CHE 4..4r NARES rF1' t444E. (PM Peak Hoer �. INDEPENDENT LAND USE SIZE TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE 841-Automobile Salesi 1000 Sq.Feet Grose 31,13 •Weekday,Peak H n 01 Best Flt(114) 33 50 e3 • T`1.81(X)*23.7. • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 129 Porsche of Naples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits (2 Sheets) • • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 130 • Porsche ofNoples SDPA—TIS —April 2016 • lv • . I.; k „ r ii 1 2.3, . . i ,„ . , <j< _Ltd;1 1 ! I lit :it, ' i_ik i i O j JJ 114 4 ' I (j ( ; .1 i. 'y .fid m j 4 N-- A : rt*. ''za'r'ly.. X-, �' N§ r*'�i, n 7::''":"1.'",:" i;,:F,:'._,;,,,S.`:' ." - G _ -' '',.t--,„„:4;,:o.-- audtti .,;'.:L: Ik � g �da��"firr�t 3 Y *A #` i �iy, St1 . * ","f- X-1Ii ,",,r,,,50,40,- ,ate L, �,7 ' 7t;t4- ! • _---. lied l'i niS t. • � ,4ag ` X� , . ° }� ,.. x� „Ke `` ' co 'ami 4' 1141,, � qtr ' �:rat.' - } • Ims�Q {- i ® b s — j iii 1 I �t • 9 /li `• am a 2' '� ,r t 1- 1 j .i'+' -4, .,„,, ,, , Y '• - (-- s , Iuw. �.nz x, r',?1'.'1:,,,,:i 5}•1 ,6.i rk , p �jCe a 1 � r� rk � � ' a c ) :,;',4,'1', (0 „� r�•'. Q' (a �.. --��II� y I t y • �_ �J �� r¢°, y.,`'z _ a '� a''''.-.04:! ~ LU Z I ,' � r`;* 1 d o•�. '1 a � Y v.,!,,,in44.ii -1 ii,..,.F).1:41-',.',1 - ;ai__',—� e : �i�lr� O O W 1 k R . � _._., .R. 0 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 31 • Porsche of Noples-SDPA—TIS—April 2016 • jrko I ,a A lit i it ._______._1;_._____ 1 I $ Ia. 1 i A. \ .. IR ii--0-op. ,.. ___ 1 ; i .1 1 ._1_..4 ... 1 , 1 i 1 .._ _ HI -r, ,. „, i - : 1 _i_ 1 , 1 i ,..„40,„.. .;,, t ,..... 1 co , i. 1 t , t-,42- :.,4i .•,;,-- i IT 1 i .4 , 1 l - F C��3d' - .__ I L �" .Kt. p * tl",I, { F Ik,sAa+s. j 4 ! 2 ' i . � £5,?S� sy&� ' N$ ' b� t t sN..�� tl, ,�'k c §. S 1 -CL » ,/, { '.4"..,''..I.: tl7' 1.4a . I '. A�! r yds 4 ,� w1' €r 4 7ay i —• .---:---1 - i _ I �, Q N • '3' � , L). ::-'';`,—,41:,....,.13'ii Jtr `'k _.. --�a, -..} 1-titl T Rx balA B YF 4' h -''' �D I ' I y� C ' , pt' ,[ ' C{W, F { Lxy Y^i9'1,141,S i /_1 �y1 �/ b Ill .it" .�i ��' I y4 y , �'Sc r 1 il la •"�� ! ""Nd alt It y`akttor s n ^ ti (•-43.. 'I' 1 lb .'n .....„,,,,N, i. ki .. .4-,,,,.....,,,..,4t e �•�4 1 '0 ir) ry d �"Q $ �r��r� h� �,40 4 y�.4'�" �0.r 1 r@( �I I ai 1 I -F— 1 ..;;LIN-7.,,,,,,,,f,',..,.., t'•;,1„,'.4.•„.$•••'•,-'4'•!,,,Stv4i i V•1.V °••gt ! 11� p 7 I '+II R�l tr1.140,it•.4,W;l1'.,•',',. 1.7. , fr.,;!k,, , ,.,s' , 1 15 2 i L1/4„, ....A44.4 r,,,,,,i,. ,,,. , .. . , „,,,,,,..,,,,),..,. / rq l b t4 ; }, E J •• 1• q 1W'C3 i— a tl' a - e � 1 i -1 1 4 � I ��, 1 _ _ � 1' 6,,-7,..,,p,",„:,:#4, -,:-.!4,,,t.5 � �s�, ✓ . C 'Jlnl{��rlrj�; � � ; F h I ; I s y , I t+ + ^ „ , i.,..,,..,,,J"..-,0]a;fio .,, ,,, a. , , ' ST" x� s ya I, ki • IZ�n ' JIcd,Gm µ.c u44' a i i t CI} ! v# • l{ a Is a wY I ,i e1 W (' IL_ __ -44 _�..__�:. .: c---`ter IL Li1 ! ll111 • 1 .a. �. 1 1 0 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 132 co j, 1] CD t; w ot Y, I t 4i� 1 , k ,, , .., f cc+.i Porsche of Naples - 3147 Davis Blvd. AMSI PRAXIS3 • I • 11 C) 0 ; m —a O C)000) m —I — cEE_.'') m z 7:3 . A r V) M 0c C) ; . 000-4 m O E K I I mmr4im 8 -n m T EE2m -1 cn —73 n o > I , 1 1 ccc z 0� c) z O 1 333 z ,iC 1"15m0 m rii 0 -D_-I yyy n z OD D L O � Cl) m D Z0Z 0 M Zzcn I 1 m 1 H 1 i 1 1 I 11 0 11.1.prerAemire PC .11 COVER °"" "1�"`�.»R PORSCHE OF NAPLES -y„ _ o�-nmEpnoni:cno�s t 1 TITLE SHEET PREPARED FOR J.R.EVANS ENGIEERING,PA. 4,4,,,::,,,, ,'�r�` �' NAPLES.COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA ..===. 1,: 1----" I=. rI -- I It I 1 ii 111 q P 51 81' iii ( 4 q'' II ii RE 1 gL grg'o' ;{c a � 1Ii l � . 'i qtg II/ _1:raiiiik "'"k"'tfft/.4:ifIN/. 1 i �iikP E f7g g ` Q�� : 0: }i '',1010 IE:4-41$ 1�i grg:G qv S Z I a I'p rr -- f ,� 3ii :i. l ii ', 1©p� g IAl I _ 1,i , I f m© ' 1 �1,g I I q U I :�I —'6:12 .6 1 a if. ©� r, i ° o .. I I y .I Il a+ =--- -- iii ai € :DM ©, e ` • € �=LI I 1 ti F YyI 1, e p a gm �p, I€ gib�t t`,I tbill_, 1 1 Fr 'I f yy _ pp ss / ©• r 1,ti C;_�€ €%Dili 0� r.. iii :ill !► DG 'Al i b S'LO ii III I a. no mg 11t[15 g igIIINCE'pp 1 .I ii a 1 . ilillt [I' aCO I Ilm, 47,r ✓i f ali 'I 0p € D0 pp I i I. 1 -ii, ,_,- i t!l, „t:,... 1 ,I. , :.....\ 1 . ii.. ,.,. i : ,7,1,,,,. 1,- i , , ; i r--0- _ .__.t. _, .-...44__.,,,,....„.....-...,,,,?...k.i. , ,,,i , ..f.....tv....w. ...___'7"-Oa' '1 i r �•a a=a iipp Opt 1,1 '!\i „r' �e It:I i:c e;,7..,„:„‘„,,,,.\\.<,. J 1 i j Dill !hips!!q �0;` ell: ,i Iii ' Cp 1E1 1; 1 �6 ad! 013,''..1, 6p' it iii l' FF r P•I---- ,t i iri 13 + i 4 1. I I 1 i ' l it i I ! ' ipi I ' I. ;11 '; 11 i I !I fill " H 1 �i I ii;iii i' III i{��;i� i��I�I�!: f'i iiiiiii oil illi !ins!� i li tit i1 flip1I .I - ,!. ..*,-,- ,- ifi1 f ,,,,,-.. ,. , ,,,, I - °„ , :,„9.,4! 1v. i I i i'r i v (Id it I 1' I f ! 11 1 !1111 111 11 i,li t1f �q y(=i I! I rim,' i r 0I , s.�v �r: n v 6 •!i 3"; 1 1 i I 11 t �{��i�- �i� �i{=�1'' I[II;'I- iii=� Ali IIi Iii � it? I 'lit'� � I ,i 1Ii ,!`;i �!' i'i 1!i i ia'E i 1 i , i 1 l,7 (I= i 11� L 1E11 }g ' ,I LI 11! dpi '1 {1 i t IliiIm I °'I frill''I nln!1mill 'I'I 11t?tl? i { N 1111, 11'11' 11111111 °I #ill ni a. t € 3 11 i I 1111 I1e� I I[ iiiiiii II MIM milli HIM lilt ilii ' ilii II i iiiiiii 1 I � 11 I I I I I � I i A 1 I I I I i . I i ..I .r..'"—. '" I ' 1111111 n 1111111 1111111 111111 1111- uill" lilt' u I 1 nun ICMI "°'--1---7' _ ...•" PORSCHE OF NAPLES :' �_°_..PRODUCTIONS,,.,,, OUTSIDE raoDurnoNs CODE MINIMUM` E PREPARED FOR:J.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. s "I�! ,' `` _ _ - LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH NAPLES.COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA 1 W i lHiIii!!ijIitIIiiIIE!lli1 11lil11 ' 6R iI (i'. � tt�llttl:?ri l(ll•'11 111r1t ;111'1!F g 'Tin`tlilr�ltetll l•I i}f(li1•; 1 �}![=lllli `F ��' I° �It t till; tl'1t r... i. 1I'}} ! [ ti' ,r1t it t 4'. a l,i:t t i ll l ;1! iii. 111 1141j F 11� r 1 till #I 11!' i 11 ri ![1 J( J+j i it I Iil � la I I it �r1 d 11 i' i}i.t tI tl i1 r l , 1- ; 1111111111#111,111111 tI�'} i3 111 t t1 11{ #Ir }tilt id. = t lits. lilt II� t I1 11101111111111111iiiii 1Ft I 'r, F 11,1 I eft'°Il1}• [ I�it } ' ; � t > , 0111 ] !( ii } i t 111►' itFt' e)•1 � 1; ; i } I��IF � 11Ii ] IIF ] 1 }I rrlrlt,;rI1 s1111 I ., rt� 1 iiii 1 pi I} • ;jtFIl1 ;'Ir ij Ili#ttftit i1 l �I Ir I �f,Jit =r ;111111( 11t r]FF � � � 11 F• � 'trio , a f , l i 1 I 11111111111100111,11111111 1 f ill #I 1,111111 ill, FI 11111th r lo l ll 1 I ,/t , ( i i! ill 1 1St} II 1 11 FI I I` til , ' I 1 11E1111111°Itl'Ill Well lilll .1 Wit ;' I 1'1�II ill `,Ii( 1 r i } ILII ii{11111'; 11,11;1 l II i' I} II I lt7=F1t !III l AlIII Ii PI t i illpii:r1-1 't:tl.111;11 1 i'1higlllji ll 11111]1111111/3111.1•'1111111;111#11111iNhiiill1. • It1 I,1 I!t 1'I(Ilr1t11tl1ti 1 }, 11 1i 1.1,1 i� i.dd1i 1 (1 , 1l (. d }} t•t�li° 1.11} 'Ioltlilll 1 l li I3 t 1 ( °: 111 11 r 1 , n t•t l t:uii tI a l Ii lit tit' Iii 1 imil r°I 1 } Ii i ' l.li1+1lI111illll11 1,1 11 �11}, It ltll� .1113' t � 111'iiltl Itl•III I.tl1 Lill f{ '{ i•il'lil 1 i• 1111:0,1114111101.0..,.1,11,1 1r it • 11,1, s 1 1 I ( F }! r , r, 1S 1,• •t` 1 1 bi. 11 1 1! 1 iti.,11r. . is I! Irk Nitwit. i i� II I]t 11 i Iir1 t1 llI itrlllt;telllri'I1it! I , tt#11, 1r.11lt. ( 1 }[111111. 11 1} , , � ,�.1 1`, } t � 11,1}I Ilt1,l, t 1 1 (I 1111 ltil lit 116` 1i'{it''1 111 1 11 1t 11! 1i A 1 1 ' ,11.1 1�/ r , llit•11i1]111111}lit?1]t1;1 Il r:i i 1 i r1 i ppm 0, tt 111 a rt j 1 i l 1 19 11 e t i t i = flatIN!! t 1 1 �� " • t ! 1 1 �'. t t 1 } t 1' r# 1 1 i t;I[Illl tft1t1111 11i1111J1F1t !1 a i(1} rll li 1,1 11 al it 11 r ° liipli 11rr'111=(r jiilliliiiii I 1 Itb I] i] ii 1 1 e 91 1111!111 1t 11 [ ( t li 11lir 1 r rr(' 1` f i f; ;rl t �i 'PITT Irl ] f [ , r 1}pit : , l i`r }u; 11./14111211, lil [ 9 1 1• I i. lliiiiiii 11 1111 #t1111I]ll '1 . °I Ilijt(Ilor 11 e I rs t I 11 IIIiII'l 1' 1ft 9 l'till }1 I Iili ;till 1i ! ' 1F1I I`. t 111/111111 [ It 1 _ 9 ` rl1'1I 1 1 1r 1 = 1 l ,!'} I1r1F1 i 1I ii }ti+Ii `- 1"III Irl t ]t Lila 1]}11 I } t1i111 1- 111 1 It 1 r111=11'1111t' IP Ii1°rl;iill►1l li, 1i,! I it t lt11�t 1}t F1111} t 1 fi iIi {lit; I ... ( }1� r1 ltri,(I pill 111}1111 ` ' 11 i�'(•i'.111 ' l !t rt c 11 t ii I { i I;t,i Ir s1 1 It l (t fllj} t 1 {t.; ,i i [ , } 11t 1 t Ilii 11111041( i 1 t. Ili" tl 111 i 1 1 1 If11lIl1Rl1 it tl,iiiil11r1�Mil 1111 1 ! 1 lI r 1 ( I 1 r 11 I lit 1 1 Pr l t1t 1 Ilii i t t ii1`ii 11'111 I{ 1'"}hi,l't'll /1 111=i�1llIper,111111111 Id 1 li ! 1 1'1 1 i ! 111 II •11 i, lilt { it IIIIiiiiiiiiiiiiililliiiiiiillitlilitili t111' it it I.- •r r1 ii11 til11',11131j';illllil 1st l ( ,l'lFll I{j y111111ti111tIr1 1!;111111;! } .Hitt; I 1516 `t=►1 i1 •1 11 Iiiiii II 1 1 t• it1 1 !tr I li ilii` ]'l ttllr,'i�l 1i Tial: I1t,.! , ! i tlti 1,11 1 1 t 1! 't ,=lis 11' e ! (Ii 1 I1 I 1111' , Itt 1 it t' tl i , , Hitt - 11l':1.1(t1l1t11tt ri 11111111.1 111 tIl it 1!,111 t1 ttt°,1, f1 ,I•�r[1, �� 1!fli !iJjt 11, •ti, 'W1011111111 'iii t! r,,11r1t 9l rt'i' 1 Till I r1I 11'1 1 �t. il(1 1= =11 l`dllilr f I 111I ' 1Itdi:01i I, i !i 1111x1 1i =111 t�I1 I : .131.1 ill; `I 1 1 1111 1 11 111 11 till 111 111 t 11 111 llltitli 11 ' t} ' 1 t ] r, VI i ; #[ 111 I. 111: ( ;til tl1lt {Il 1; 1 ' rill! 1)[ 1 °ill' 111 1 t will I ti 111'1 111 11 "I Illi 3119 Mil r1; 1l; l}l-i i 1 1 1 t 1 I ill it 1 tl t r l tr 11 Milli 1 r. 1 f ; • { {' ! 1 '' 1 11 111 . Ill 1 ilii F 1 1111, 1,11 ( 11 - allI r l •� ; i t It 1 i t 11 till t1 it 1{11 Il` illi 11,11! ,tl 111:1111, ' t I t I 1111 111 1 lit ;=tf1 l4l ll (Ill Ill 111' tlllii i it '!1111 11 I I I ! ;II r ' } ' 191 r 1i it 1113 x 1 1-i:!` y ]' r• t 1 tl(]111"li 1• RIP ll�ttl t+Iltr� 11t111i• ! ,.111.1= til 1111 iI191-t !illi= 1111 111111 = 1IiI11;1111 , 1 Ill;lili1.1 !I 1-(�;..-,.•,.'i ili' i1 � • 1j ii11t1 3111 11;11! r,li;c111111111401111111611 l 11 !l IFrttlt ti.1 (•tc1 :4111 11111i Ii111111,I 1111111 lit ,111{011111/1 • rl 111 111 ' 1•' i 111'11= 11111 111 r•r !►11 t1•l1 l'i `` r F i y i 1 }li 1 l r l f 1 1 • 111 1111111 Lit }111.1 illj Illill111,11 110.111111 tli;oirll!1 1111 ti1i1il11111111 111111 !1111 i1liptIIj1 it 11111`1 111(111 rdi ll !1f It 111 tl111'1 t •l illi 1! . 1°11;1 Tilt! tat' ill 11114 11 I=t•t lir;II,pa 1 . 11 i I lt;1111 1 i11� t 111 Illi 1`,111 ' ' ltlt`11;1ij 1' 1111!1=1 t1'1' ills ( ,1 II 11;111 rt:'1�,Illllilll is !lit}1111 ; 1441411111It11 ( f ( r 1;"1‘11`1.11 i I=111 = i 1! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1i 1! t I• 1,T111 , 11 lit 1r i` 1. It 11ll1141/1111114111 11 tilt 1. 111 1►i l!} 1!111 t= li i 1 - 1 11111111111110 , i 1 1111 1, i 11 I ;1;;1111 Ii;, 11 { /! 411 1 [ 1 11111/11/101P!11 11 11 t 7 111 11 11 111; !Mil I }11 ;Tif 111 ! it 1111 111 1'1111.1'! 11}t! i11111111' it i11 1 111111 1161 1111 ,1 11111"11 1 11111 1111 111111 11'11 II 1 11 ' 1111 fil 1,1111}I 1' I t` 1 11141,1 I, 1 11i•,i1111111,s11 1 { 131 it1} t lar 1 r i ,t< •i III l 11 I 1 1 . 11111!ll.j t 111 � � ] i1 (• 1 ! l `1111 .111; j1j11 111 1, 11tH Ii 111 IN 11 F 1141 WI it 1 II} t1 lllt]Iltrlt 11111 14111111.111,1111 11 11 41111101 1 11 i 11;4141111110111 i1 1t 1'{ 1110 11 11111.111 it t111{il} 1111 111 1111 p.111111I I 111 1 t l i 111 ' 1 71 11 ti' {,.1 ' til WU IMO 11 1r It 1 !With t 1}11 {I 11}]ll /hit l; 1, t 11 11 t•Il;t 171 1 0 }1. 1t 11 1 lit !i 11 }l t` ' 1 ''Iillllit 111111 111 i1](li r1�11 kit ll ' till 111 is itlill y 'e If s t lti,t 11 l� II& 11!11 =till }l ] } . t 1 F 11 I , r KI."--°.. 1 Li:;,I, ''-'.°..:A.�a 1 Z..1:1 1 1 CM2 "' """` t 1 PORSCHE OF NAPLES �'~ O rr51DGP ODucnouS °'.-,-° CODE MINIMUM NOTES PREPARED FOR:J.R EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. - ��,' `` _w.a. AND CALCULATIONS NAPLES,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA 1 i g:1 I L , çi u- n-nT-'�_ i'`1 4f: 4 $ !1 i; < Fir1 % N aB1i 11 dIt c.0 -- III, i �� . e g ' IJJi, I i ( I I i I' I ` o '11 A i1 J is t,,, 1 �0 i. I = 01 is/ � - - 1 . ♦ . �I j/�► 5 !I ``� 3 li ct" . .44 a o �� -' „4,I ;4e♦ I yI 1 S PA.�� 4' f Y 111 1 1114 # eat `'� 4:�4 — E N $ I WWII! 111I11i ! ii s Ih ;w — ��• 2.74741?: _ : r. Ir I ;�r*4�1 �": IL ' I "I �nj r nnc 1 it I t..ss3 -=:a- « -t::-::s. .".E I 1 11 rid 4 ' 'If 1 11 \\N\\\'\.1 — t@ 11, Illaat;1tI � IlIP,i11 1 r.i t t(1 ill it fl 1.I=IN;i II I I1111411111 1.x 6, P1 Y $44 .;11 x t)4f li 1 ill yti t ,f�5i4} i i{1 i I 41.1I1'rtti I4 I . if :ii, i.f I I f II fr-, i'i $l i'SI ipi ¢r §1 d a E lTit.1!11114 i q 11‘.. �11 hi I f'9 f 1 1 f4�}1 ji f 1111}4 r l l y t 1I;It1I il '1114 1114 #gt 91 1i #k i€Bi1# if 1 t# 4 fa ? t{{ qq 11 1 '1 1 ' i �fF4 ; 1_1 i I1 I i! t i l 1 1� 1 111 i in It II instills i III IZ ! � 1 �� d 4 lt[l;$llil: iii, d If t it ,111.111111' Mg III 1.1i O. 1 1 i. ' 1111 14411 ii 11 i li i 11 #i,� r1 t1'1 i � � � I!P 11 S it t t lls 91, d111 xl' AO P 1I ! 1 i � tl1a1 1111 A I - [ 11 !' 11 11111111111liq�� III; 1 9 ..... o..... •1 1 ' • ii t 1 B1 `1 I °'::::1=","" km 1,24 PORSCHE OF NAPLES +. CM3 °" " OUTSIDE PRODUCTIONS �� V.CODE MINIMUM E PREPARED FOR J.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,PA ""- "^ """• �_ `"`• IRRIGATION PLAN NORTH NAPLES,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA �,,,�,= i • . I 4 a �+ { R I 1 liii ' :111 . 96 3 HI ! L I ; P 71 dg I 1 dIdJiJ B I 9 / /i , ' 1 II I hi �y �� , II 41 le s7 §. a : - : 1 T 1k \ l it 11 I0 o o O / ' i .© i o I lII 63 mai!yol ! ' - ,nilqil{ 11 !II - • q $ 1 a i;iii .� ec i MOW : ....pm.. -- -----1, .7-1-7 1 1—7 . , . .' — • , ! 1: ! 'i ' ' '' . - ' • IMI i . 1 . I 0 0 0 to 0 to t t t 1 ' o 0 0 0 0 . . t . ._to. 1 o 0 0 Elmommommorwm0. El... A___.„ OcX)4014 ,c) C--) 0 0 ii,i v---1- - , 7 i , ilp 0_ :+iii--, , ,— ,pill. •_, „ f -0 iiii I 1 ~.r.•.t,1. eij,A Fe 4:-* la 1 ._ 111 ,i.7 7:- .ii. -.:--. I . : r 3i aiii- .. .. I --c) ( 1. /- ,nle. 0.4: ii.iF im riti 1 i i, _ , _l CI GI i•In C)-- -t .'.- -fp7 7 7.11.7tU2- lik a . , g IV ICSII a=4 ' Er 0_ :(4. Rtfil :i [RuAlt 4 4 . __ 1. 0-- 4- '. i-ii'<r'' '- Ar e, :: 1111 1 i :,. 0-. j-n'' --"i---'''-=411 0- 0- --!. . - - -- 1- -14- C>- 4...-t icir.'7741,11 -71F' i e- .... !' 1.E V . RI .I, 1 0 . -1- ' - '. 111011111.11111.11111Mil .,i , 1 0- _ _ '..,.....•- I 0-- . --kt!--;i4:: " 'j .... I Ili 0 [-I { f1g i01Ir llrliii I11 1 C) 1 R g g.1 ii1 11 Pi co ItELEXSEO FOR COMM,ION AND PEMOT • __,_._, U I J E ///�L-...' _..I --- '0 0 0 day j LI' ! I tl O 111 .' I j IIIII iI C .....z1_1!Iiil 1 ,I„1111. 1 ;l.,cml ll $i 11 o-_ IIII -0 t.'11: Fill:1::' ,IP1141 1 111 1 I i 0_ I Ill I__!_4_- ------t _ - 1--------'--- --.--.-.-.- -- -- � 'iii ; in" !! Iil II I } : - i • pill I I I. '�. NII; 1 I 1 ?III I I I I (4;;DOO bb ' I $ IIA= fill Ilii Cuo;11n►(1 I II f x-4 4 d �$� Age INi4gIOC',I EL g1; E N 1 as 4 1 II 1i (� �f' tw I I + -y +659qiii 1"g ;'g 0: i NI i 1g{ I id l� 1 _ ) i t y L v I s T, L i ■ ill ei i, i�b ii� 1 ii ir E is s t um,mill •x sgM 4!_ 411 I _----- 4 1 \ t / W 1 ATM ,'. / Si "ant i 1 I i` • i „ 2, 1 1 2 I 1! i 1 — d $1 i is �, "ii! I 4D L r —f1:-..itio. . 11 II 1 li,IN 2 i i , I _ ill i . i=, ill ! I I I € i= rI j , iii i l i iiia i lif F f t 41111$ it E �g _ Ei! I 191 !i i $ i 1i .ii. i . ' flipi l — ir � II ` 1 Ili i IIi1�i pii! 3� i;lg 9 g) I i i i ii u o 53 T c i9 "'i' II a 3, g1i11Pci \a s ;1g- y .1.441"01..11.1.C1.0,0 POUR i g i Z N 0'48'49"W(),1) 26T.52'(P) pC II �i ' y r:� F►e e 4 % y 4 4' 4 4 7. 4 ,4 " % k 4 4 4 4 .4 i . 0 4 u 1 t 4 4f s4 .2 %palsi 4 6 ex ae.v,. \ 4 n Z L 4 24II MI • mz \ 1, y ' x t. 0,� ! 1 �0 Ste\ �+ U a do \ o 1 yCyJ % 4 v► �` uc —_ QM 1 .y 4 y •� §,ii 6 \ m Raym� ssd1Lyr vy 4 \ li: 5 R C s s a $ N m 4" E I 4 44 CO s '4 IN \ 4 y ! 1 V, '4 M 1 px .. . 4 4 „.. .,.. , ,4 . , V \ „„„ „ 1 7,,,: 4 Y' 4~ @:i '4 N4� g\ ak8 to __ \ , 4 N 4.d e.a• \ !1 N.DO'4848"W. 2.4 135.00' "` 5 ` Is immitti ! £fes m '—�I . Y v •, r yy�� 4 R i !!3 SD'48'40'E 04 131.2501(11) +iF cl Z 5&5 I\\\\\\\\NN Ta I €E' ! $/ m sa8i aee VI ! 0 8 6 o `.6, 0 ! Z ti 4 T a a •i 114.41 1$j� 1g^ g` ggl I, III F' z �; ; Y�q� 1 P!IIt IIJ!J � ��! E i z ',£i a2A.b8 VI @ 4I ; 1 liltPi 1-4 II!€ g A 0 i i4 a PO C g,ix g III qi 19 +4 I i # 3?Zi. Ye „2p7 q ilif 8 , i s 9 1 n g tf c �'E 1 '4 � A):p. p M Q 5 i " l ,Ii4. d;a Yei sB1 !iJ ; Es 't