The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 05/10/2016 Item #17B61HiMiMI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a Resolution providing for the expansion of an existing conditional use which allows a social club in the Estates Zoning District pursuant to Section 2.03.0l.B.1.c.2, of the Collier County Land Development Code for property known as the Naples Bridge Center located at 5865 Golden Gate Parkway in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida (CU- PL20150000873). Companion item to PL20150002525 / CPSS-2015-3). OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) review staffs findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The petitioner seeks Conditional Use approval to allow for expansion of the Naples Bridge Center. The proposed expansion will include the adjacent 2.34± acre property located immediately east of the current facility and will expand the existing Naples Bridge Center clubhouse building on the existing site to a maximum size of 15,000 square feet. The existing Naples Bridge Center was originally approved as a Provisional Use, PU-804c, Resolution Number 80-128 on July 8, 1980. The original site consisted of a 2,610 square -foot building and 70 parking spaces. A second Conditional Use, CU -93-13, Resolution Number 94-424 was approved on June 14, 1994 to expand the building to 3,500 square feet and increase the parking to 83 parking spaces. A third Conditional Use, CU -2006 -AR -11034, Resolution Number 07-138 was approved on May 22, 2007 to expand the building an additional 3,500 square feet and increase the parking by 50 parking spaces. This proposed building expansion increased the building from 3,500 square feet to 7,000 square feet and increased the parking by 49 spaces for a total of 132 parking spaces. As previously stated, the petitioner proposes to add approximately 2.34± acres to the Naples Bridge Center facility and to expand the existing building to a maximum building area of 15,000 square feet and to increase the parking area by approximately 75 percent. The Conceptual Site Plan depicts the Naples Bridge Center building, parking areas, ingress and egress. The Site Plan also depicts 0.50 acres of native vegetation preserve area, a 25 -foot wide Type D right-of-way buffer, a 30 -foot Type B buffer along the east property line, and 15 -foot wide Type B buffer along the west property boundaries. The preserve area has been strategically located to buffer the residential neighbor to the north. Vehicular access to the site is provided from Golden Gate Parkway. Pedestrian access to the site is provided from a sidewalk along Golden Gate Parkway. Packet Page -1375- 5/10/2016 W.B. FISCAL IMPACT: The Conditional Use by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the Conditional Use is approved, a portion of the land could be developed and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Planning staff finds the proposed Conditional Use consistent with the FLUE (Future Land Use Element) subject to the approval of the companion small scale Growth Management Plan Amendment GMPA PL20150002525 / CPSS-2015-3. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition CU-PL20150000873, Naples Bridge Center Conditional Use (CU) on March 17, 2016. The CCPC voted 6 to 0 to forward this petition to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a recommendation of approval subject to the staff recommended Conditions of Approval 1 thru 3 and the following Condition of Approval: The eastern 30 -foot wide buffer shall be planted with the materials of a Type C Landscape Buffer. This note has been added to the Master Plan and to the Conditions of Approval. There have been no letters of objection received. Therefore, this petition has been placed on the Summary Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Before you is a recommendation by the Planning Commission for approval of a conditional use authorizing a social and fraternal organization in the Estates zoning district. A conditional use is a use that is permitted in a particular zoning district subject to certain restrictions. All testimony given must be under oath. The attached report and recommendations of the Planning Commission are advisory only and are not binding on you. The petitioner has the burden of demonstrating that the necessary requirements have been met, and you may question the petitioner, or staff, to satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria has been satisfied. In addition to meeting the necessary criteria, you may place such conditions and safeguards as you deem appropriate to allow the use, provided that there is competent, substantial evidence that these additional conditions and safeguards are necessary to promote the Packet Page -1376- 5/10/2016 W.B. public health, safety, welfare, morals, order, comfort, convenience, appearance, or the general welfare of the neighborhood. As a further condition of approval of the conditional use, you may require that suitable areas for streets, public rights-of-way, schools, parks, and other public facilities be set aside, improved, and/or dedicated for public use, subject to appropriate impact fee credits. Approval or denial of the Petition is by Resolution. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC and further recommends that the BZA approves the request for CU- PL20150000873, Naples Bridge Center, subject to the approval of the companion small scale Growth Management Plan Amendment GMPA PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3. Prepared by: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Zoning Services Division, Growth Management Department Attachments: 1) Staff Report 2) Proposed CU Resolution 3) Location Map 4) Master Plan 5) NIM Transcript 6) Application—go to: http://gpps3.colliergov.net/a,enda/ftp/2016BCCMeetings/AaendaMay 1 O l 6/Gro wthM--rnt/Applic ation 2-16.pdf 7) Legal Advertisement Packet Page -1377- COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.17.8. 5/10/2016 17. B. Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a Resolution providing for the expansion of an existing conditional use which allows a social club in the Estates Zoning District pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.2, of the Collier County Land Development Code for property known as the Naples Bridge Center located at 5865 Golden Gate Parkway in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida (CU-PL20150000873). Companion item to PL20150002525 / CPSS-2015-3). Meeting Date: 5/10/2016 Prepared By Name: GundlachNancy Title: Planner, Principal, Zoning 4/5/2016 9:55:37 AM Submitted by Title: Planner, Principal, Zoning Name: GundlachNancy 4/5/2016 9:55:38 AM Approved By Name: BellowsRay Title: Manager - Planning, Zoning Date: 4/5/2016 10:47:42 AM Name: BosiMichael Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning, Zoning Date: 4/6/2016 1:29:01 PM Name: PuigJudy Title: Operations Analyst, Operations & Regulatory Management Date: 4/6/2016 3:20:21 PM Packet Page -1378- 5/10/2016 17.B. Name: PuigJudy Title: Operations Analyst, Operations & Regulatory Management Date: 4/6/2016 3:20:59 PM Name: AshtonHeidi Title: Managing Assistant County Attorney, CAO Land Use/Transportation Date: 4/11/2016 8:54:59 AM Name: MarcellaJeanne Title: Executive Secretary, Transportation Administration Date: 4/15/2016 11:10:30 AM Name: KlatzkowJeff Title: County Attorney, Date: 4/20/2016 5:06:05 PM Name: IsacksonMark Title: Division Director - Corp Fin & Mgmt Svc, Office of Management & Budget Date: 4/22/2016 2:25:58 PM Name: CasalanguidaNick Title: Deputy County Manager, County Managers Office Date: 4/29/2016 3:31:56 PM Packet Page -1379- 5/10/2016 17.B. AGENDA ITEM 9-13 Co er C0141.ty STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION - ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 17, 2016 SUBJECT: CU-PL20150000873, NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER APPLICANT/OWNER/AGENT: APPLICANT/OWNER: Naples Bridge Center,Inc. 5865 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34112 REOUESTED ACTION: AGENT: Mr. D. Wayne Arnold Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs,, FL 34134 The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, providing for the expansion of an existing Conditional Use which allows a social club in the Estates Zoning District pursuant to Section 2.03.0l.B.l .c.2. of the Collier County Land. Development Code (LDC) for property known as the Naples Bridge Center. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject 4.68± acre property is located at 5845 and 5865 Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway between. I-75 and Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Please see the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) PURPOSE/ DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The petitioner seeks Conditional Use approval to allow for expansion of the Naples Bridge Center. The proposed expansion will include the adjacent 2.34+ acre property located immediately east of the current facility and will expand the existing Naples Bridge Center clubhouse building on the existing site to a maximum size of 15,000 square feet. NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, CU-PL20150000873 March 4, 2016 Page -1 of 10 Packet Page -1380- nem 01 ION I 7 ow Aw- ?016 W.B. 01, it x � a � N N OatlA3Vloa a3moo l58'a'0 WgYA3V1OB a311 -IW gkUl b y g W F � E 9 a g 3 Avxuw im W 19-9 MU0 ► ' axn�vevs <� a oavn3,nos gg gg _ � 3 rvY�r"9C vavauvemorva aaVn3lnoe vavaave fifi v1Nvs .0 VIF °aa o u NaVO uNnoo 91-31Y1MI'd emW3aX3WOa79 - ono' 95Q� �. 7 0 n ANA aoaxm u n aoatndln 91 U a �q fL a OVOa NOISONINI }{�p��wyp7! q3 Y�j� yyj/ ]6.g9 5j I UU Packet Page -1381- vwNonim ?016 W.B. 01, it 5/10/2016 17.B. EXISTING 25' WIDE TYPED' 2S WIDE TYPED' LANDSCAPE BUFFER DRAINAGE_ANDSCAPE BUFFEf2 OUTFALL ��JJ GL1G".L'iAT�'ARIQY�1C,: N i �1� o av w SCALE: 9' = 601 LE Q NAPLES --VCE CENTER 02/04/2016 ®GradyMinor fl.e n�mncw mwl sunc>ws . rb�wra . Ianuwype,Wmecb CONDITIONAL USE CONCEPTUAL SITE PIAN Packet Page -1382- � r e c c -------------- �� a �� ,� v-°'��L, F �� `��"'"��..✓�v�. fru b• r �, -` 8 r � fi r" r �... r.�' �,.r. ,..,✓.rT�.-�f Jl{Illllllllllllllllillllll J ao is 7 r-�„s ✓"f! �' —!' '� flllllllllllllllillifllllll �l 111[11111111111111111111111c— ,/ � I1111llllf Illi � '+�,;,,_ lillllli1111111111[1111l111 Mr Illllll1111111111f�11 11{III i l?ala I11111t11 1111 � 11111111111111111 111 11111 � � '••e Pr �1 6lJ%� !'� .+' ./'+ / / ✓ rte,';' . ly,J✓ J _.-./ �Jf' � I , �. � . ,.c � ' r ,� ,F ' ' L. � r£h / 4 �lr�� ,P �d l i l l l l l l l{ 1 1 111 1 i 11 1111 11111~ {IIIIIIIIIIt11111111111t111 , �liilll11111111111{111111111 '� / �r%✓ '*v/f !"_ / 1 �.�G^,r�f t ---------------- f �7' ------------ EXISTING 25' WIDE TYPED' 2S WIDE TYPED' LANDSCAPE BUFFER DRAINAGE_ANDSCAPE BUFFEf2 OUTFALL ��JJ GL1G".L'iAT�'ARIQY�1C,: N i �1� o av w SCALE: 9' = 601 LE Q NAPLES --VCE CENTER 02/04/2016 ®GradyMinor fl.e n�mncw mwl sunc>ws . rb�wra . Ianuwype,Wmecb CONDITIONAL USE CONCEPTUAL SITE PIAN Packet Page -1382- Y 5/10/201617.B. The existing Naples Bridge Center was originally approved as a Provisional Use, PU-80-4c, 1.4 Resolution Number 80-128 on July 8, 1980. The original site consisted of a 2,610 square -foot building and 70 parking spaces. A second Conditional Use, CU -93-13, Resolution Number 94-424 was approved on June 14, 1994 to expand the building to 3,500 square feet and increase the parking to 83 parking spaces. A third Conditional Use, CU -2006 -AR -11034, Resolution Number 07-138 was approved on May 22, 2007 to expand the building an additional 3,500 square feet and increase the parking by 50 parking spaces. This proposed building expansion increases the building from 3,500 square feet to 7,000 square feet and increases the parking by 49 spaces for a total of 132 parking spaces. As previously stated, the petitioner proposes to add approximately 2.34± acres to the Naples Bridge Center facility and to expand the existing 3,500 square -foot building by 11,500 square feet to a maximum building area of 15,000 square feet and to increase the parking area by approximately 75 percent. The Conceptual Site Plan depicts the Naples Bridge Center building, parking areas, ingress and egress. The Site Plan also depicts 0.50 acres of native vegetation preserve area, a 25 -foot wide Type D right-of-way buffer, a 30 -foot Type B buffer along the east property line, and 15 -foot wide Type B buffer along the west property boundaries. The preserve area has been strategically located to buffer the residential neighbor to the north. Vehicular access to the site is provided from Golden Gate Parkway. Pedestrian access to the site is provided from a sidewalk along Golden Gate Parkway. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Developed with a single-family residence on an Estates (E) zoning designation East: Developed with a single-family residence on an Estates (E) zoning designation. South: 6 -lanes of Golden Gate Parkway, developed with a childcare facility to the south, a single- family residence to the southwest, and a church to the southeast, all on an Estates zoning designation. West: Developed with a single-family residence on an Estates (E) zoning designation. NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, CU-PL20150000873 March 4, 2016 Page 4 of 10 Packet Page -1383- 5/10/2016 17.B. AERIAL PHOTO GROWTH MANAGEMENTPLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The 4.68± acre subject site is designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential. Estates Subdistrict within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The companion small-scale GMP amendment proposes to allow the Naples Bridge Center use on the -2.34+ acre site containing the existing facility, and for the adjoining site; immediately to the east of the current facility, parking, open space and water management. Both 2.34± acre parcels are zoned E, Estates; and are within the Golden- Gate Parkway Corridor Management zoning overlay. The westerly 2.34± acres, containing the existing facility, has a conditional use allowing the Naples Bridge Center.: GGAMP Policy 5.2.3 states, "Recognizing the residential nature of the land uses surrounding the I-75 interchange at Golden Gate, Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, there shall be no further cominerciat zoning for properties ^. abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa. Barbara. Boulevard. No new NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, CU-PL20150000873. March 4, 2016 Page 5 of 10 Packet Page -1384- 5/10/201617.B. commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above -defined segment." The easterly portion of the subject site is not designated to allow a Conditional Use. However, the companion small-scale GMPA will allow the existing and proposed development and must be adopted in order for the Conditional Use requested with this petition to be approved. 1 Certain applicable Future Land Use Element (FLUE) policies are shown below in italics followed by staff analysis in bold text. FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, surrounding land uses. Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services Section's staff as part r; of their review of the petition in its entirety. FLUE Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall t i be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. FLUE Policy 7.1 The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection y spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The one (1) project entrance (existing) shown on the Naples Bridge Center, Inc., Conditional Use Conceptual Site Plan accesses Golden Gate Parkway,§ a minor arterial (urban and rural) roadway as identified on the Collier 2025 Functional 1 Classification Map of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan.] FLUE Policy 7.2 ;t The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop, roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Because of the small size of the Naples Bridge Center project, loop roads or internal accesses are not feasible. The Conditional Use Conceptual Site Plan shows an entrance into the parking area and drive aisles.] FLUE Policy 7.3 G All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation C Element. [No proposed interconnections with adjoining properties to the project are planned or shown on the Conditional Use Conceptual Site Plan. Interconnections to the parcels to the east, west i and north of the subject site are not feasible, because these parcels are all developed with single- ,r•; 4 family residential homes.] FLUE Policy 7,4: a The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [No Bicycle and Pedestrian facilities are noted on the Conditional Use Conceptual Site Plan. As no LDC deviation is requested, sidewalks will be required per the LDC.] t CONCLUSION i Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition NOT consistent with the Golden Gate x Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan; however, the petition may be deemed consistent IF the companion GMP amendment is adopted and becomes effective. The Conditional Use NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, CU-PL20150000873 March 4, 2016 ° Page 6 of 10 Packet Page -1385- 5/10/2016 17. B. Resolution needs to contain an effective date concurrent with the effective date of the companion GMPA. Transportation. Element: The project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan, which states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planningperiod, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and a For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " The proposed development will generate a projected 31+ AM peak hour and 41± PM, peak direction trips for the proposed facility on the adjacent local roadway, Golden Gate Parkway. Staff notes that 24f AM and 31f PM of the peak trips result from the proposed additional square footage requested. The adjacent local roadway, Golden Gate Parkway, is a six -lane divided roadway and has a current service volume of 3,300 trips, with a remaining capacity of approximately 1,910 trips between I-75 and Santa Barbara Boulevard; and is currently at LOS "C" (Level of Service "C") as shown in the 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). Therefore, staff finds that the proposed project does not significantly impact adjacent roadway links. There is sufficient capacity to accommodate this Conditional Use within the 5 -year transportation planning period and the petition is consistent with the applicable policies of the transportation element. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 0.40 acres of native vegetation are required to be retained for the Conditional Use. ANALYSIS: Before any Conditional Use recommendation can be offered to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) must make findings that: 1) approval of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, CU-PL20150000873 March 4, 2016 Page 7 of 10 Packet Page -1386- 5/10/2016 W.B. property of uses in the same district of neighborhood; 2) all specific requirements for the individual Conditional Use will be met; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable; 1. Section 2.03.01.B.I.c. of the LDC permits conditional uses in the Estates (E) zoning district. The requested use for the social club use is permitted as a conditional use in the Estates (E) zoning district, subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00, Conditional Use Procedures, of the LDC. 2. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management Plan (GMP). This request may be deemed consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan upon approval of the companion GMP Amendment. The proposed setbacks are in compliance with the LDC. The Estates zoning district requires a 75 -foot front setback along Golden Gate Parkway. The existing front setback ranges from 33 to 41 feet and is a legal nonconforming setback due to a right-of-way taking for the widening of Golden Gate Parkway. The original building met the setback requirements when it was developed, and the building addition will meet the current 30 -foot side setback and 75 -foot rear setback. The project will be required to undergo the site development plan review process to ensure compliance. 3. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. As depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan, the ingress and egress to the site will be provided through an existing entrance off of Golden Gate Parkway. 4. The effect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. If approved, the proposed use should have minimal impact on neighboring properties in relation to glare, economic or noise effects. To mitigate for any noise or glare impacts to the neighbors, the applicant will provide a 30 -foot wide Type B landscape buffer along the east property line and a 15 -foot wide Type B landscape buffer along the west property line. Along the north property line, the applicant has provided an approximately 90 -foot wide preserve area. To the south, the Estates zoned residence is separated from the subject site by Golden Gate Parkway, a six -lane divided road with a landscaped median. 5. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, CU-PL20160000873 March 4, 2016 Page 8 of 10 Packet Page -1387- 5/10/2016 17.B. The Naples Bridge Center facility is compatible with the surrounding area. The Naples Bridge Center building is one-story, which is compatible with the surrounding one-story residential development. This Conditional Use property is located in the neighborhood of several other properties with Conditional Uses: five churches, a child care facility and David Lawrence Center are located within 1/2 mile of the Naples Bridge Center. Based on the information provided and with the appropriate mitigations, it appears that the proposed Conditional Use is an appropriate use of the subject site. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (II1Vl): The agent/applicant duly noticed and held the required NIM on December 14, 2015. For further information, please see Attachment: Transcripts of the Naples Bridge Center Conditional Use and GMPA Neighborhood Information Meetings. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on February 26, 2016. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CU-PL20150000873, Naples Bridge Center to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions of approval which are carried over from the previous Conditional Use: 1. The Naples Bridge Center shall not lease the facilities which are the subject of this Conditional Use. 2. The applicant shall incorporate the outdoor lighting standards outlined in Golden Gate Area Master Plan Policy 5. 1.1 into the site plan during the SDP review process. 3. The applicant shall locate the dumpster a minimum of 40 feet away from any adjacent residential property line. Attachments: Attachment A: Proposed Resolution Attachment B: Resolution Number 80-128 Attachment C: Resolution Number 94-424 Attachment D: Resolution Number 07-138 Attachment E: Attachment F: Transcript of the Naples Bridge Center Neighborhood Information Meeting — December 14, 2015 NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, CU-PL20150000873 March 4, 2016 Page 9 of 10 Packet Page -1388- PREPARED BY: y wimp, awv� NANCY DAH, AICP, PLA PRINCIP LA ER ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: RAYMON V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER. ZONING ISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION APPROVED BY: ES FREKCff, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DAVID S. WILKISON, P.E. DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, CU-PL20150000873 February 22, 2016 Page 10 of 10 Packet Page -1389- 5/10/2016 17.B. DZ31 DATE 2-- :?'j - I <' DATE Ae, DATE 3�3/16 DATE 5/10/2016 17.B. RESOLUTION 2016- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE WHICH ALLOWS A SOCIAL CLUB IN THE ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.01.11.1.c.2, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER LOCATED AT 5865 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [CU-PL20150000873] WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 80-128, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Provisional Use for the establishment of the Naples Bridge Club pursuant to Section 14-1D of the then -current Zoning Regulations, subject to a number of conditions; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-424, the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County approved a Conditional Use for the expansion of the Naples Bridge Center in accordance with a conceptual master plan, subject to a number of conditions; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 07-138, the Board of Zoning Appeals approved a Conditional Use for the expansion of the existing Bridge Center to increase the size of the building and add parking spaces, subject to a number of conditions; and WHEREAS, the Naples Bridge Center, Inc. has petitioned the Board of Zoning Appeals to add 2.34 acres to the existing Conditional Use; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of allowing this requested expansion of the existing Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.03.0l.B.I.c.2, of the Collier County Land Development Code which allows social and fraternal organizations in the Estates [15 -CPS -01495/1238841/1) 82 Page 1 of 3 Naples Bridge Center/CU-PL20150000873 3/18/16 Packet Page -1390- 5/10/2016 17.B. zoning district on the property hereinafter described, and the Collier County Planning Commission has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been -- made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 10.08.00.D. of the Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Petition CU-PL20150000873, filed by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, Inc., representing the Naples Bridge Center, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit "A," is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.03.0l.B.l.c.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates Zoning District, for a social and fraternal organization in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit `B," subject to the previously required conditions set forth in Resolution No. 07-138, which is attached as Exhibit C and new conditions set forth in Exhibit "D." Exhibits "A," "B," "C," and "D" are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution hereby supersedes and replaces Resolution No. 07-138, excepting the conditions set forth therein, which are incorporated by reference into this Resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this �4 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective on the date that the Growth Management Plan amendment in Ordinance No. becomes effective. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super -majority vote, this _ day of 2016. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Un , Deputy Clerk BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA �� [15 -CPS -01495/1238841/1] 82 Page 2 of 3 Naples Bridge Center/CU-PL20150000873 3/18/16 DONNA FIALA, Chairman Packet Page -1391- 5/10/2016 W.B. Approved as to form and legality: 3l Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Exhibit A — Legal Description Exhibit B — Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit C —Resolution No. 07-138 Exhibit D — Conditions of Approval [15 -CPS -01495/1238841/1] 82 Page 3 of 3 Naples Bridge Center/CU-PL20150000873 3/18/16 Packet Page -1392- 5/10/2016 17.8. EXHIBIT A Naples Bridge Center, Inc. Conditional Use I i Legal Description THE EAST 150' OF TRACT 75, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 30 AND THE WEST 1S0' OF TRACT 82, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 30, PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN ATTHE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 82 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 30, PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 82, NORTH 89"31'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°28'40" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 680.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 82; THENCE RUN ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 82 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 75 OF SAID PLAT, SOUTH 89°31'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00"28'40" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 680.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 75 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 89"31'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 4.68 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Packet Page -1393- 5/10/2016 17.B. Exhibit B GOELoi T r T N i o �v eo SCALE: 1" = 60' Mum NAPLES BRLDCE CENTER REVISED 03/17/2016 ®GradyMinor CMI En Beeen LdnE Sur n Plmncn Lmler�a UArcGltccLL CONDMONAL USE m.lu N"ro. ao.wvli�•«a CONCEPTUAL S(TE PIAN " Packet Page -1394- - - - - 5/10/2016 17.B. EXHIBIT C 1 of 22 PL 2015 0 0 0 0 8 7 3 REV 1 RESOLUTION 07. 138 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE WHICH ALLOWS A SOCIAL CLUB IN THE ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.04.03, TABLE 2, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, LOCATED AT 5865 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 80-128, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A," the Board of County Commissioners approved a Provisional Use for the establishment of the Naples Bridge Club pursuant to Section 14-1 D of the then -current Zoning Regulations, subject to a number of conditions; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-424, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B," the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County approved a Conditional Use for the expansion of the Naples Bridge Center in accordance with a conceptual master plan, subject to a number of conditions; and WHEREAS, the Naples Bridge Center, Inc., has filed Petition No. CU -2006 -AR - 11034, requesting an expansion to the existing conditional use to allow a building addition of 3,500 square feet and 50 additional parking spaces; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of allowing this requested expansion of the existing Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.04.03, Table 2 of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates zoning district on the property hereinafter dcscribod, and the Collier County Planning Commission has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "C") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 10.08.00.D. of the Land Development Code; and Page 1 of 2 — - Packet Page -1395- EXHIBIT C 2 of 22 ^, i S1 ) '' t' 1� a .1 U + y) ,1 WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given ,opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: Petition CU -220 -AR -11034, filed by Joss Nageon de Lastang, P.E. of Gulfshore Engineering, Inc., representing the Naples Bridge Center, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit "D," is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.04.03, Table 2 of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates Zoning District, for a social club in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "E," subject to the previously required conditions set forth in Resolution No. 80- 128 and Resolution No. 94-424, copies of which are attached hereto, together with the conditions set forth in Exhibit "F" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution hereby supersedes and replaces both Resolution No. 80-128 and Resolution No. 94-424, excepting the conditions set forth therein, which are incorporated by reference into this Resolution, and that the remainder of Resolution No. 80-128 and Resolution No. 94-424 are accordingly repealed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super -majority vote, this lday of 2007. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By. Attest es qja AMtyf Jerk s 1 gnature 001 Attorney BOARDOF • r COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA Page 2 oft Packet Page -1396- 5/10/2016 17.B.! 5/10/2016 17.B. EXHIBIT C" 3 of 22 U R -EO -X2 8 �t A E S•0 L U T„Y.0 N J} L 10 1980 RELATING TO PETITION NO. pU-80-4C, FOR PROVISIONAL U$E OP PROPERTY HER£- INAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. W115REM , the Legislature of the State.of Florida -in has conferred on all Chapter 125 and 1'63, Florida Statutesg counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary �. for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a ordinance establishing regulations for Comprehensive Zoning the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, ch is the granting of provisional usep; and among whi I WHKRF'Ag, the coastal Area Planning Commission; being the nstituted planning board for tha area duly appointed and co hereby affected, has held.a public hearing after notice as in and provided, and has considered th said regulations made e ad- 6 in a g�_i-zone for visability of Provisional Use �— ter described, and has found as a matter the property hereinaf of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been :nade concerning all applicable matters req aired i?y said regula- with Section.l. of .the Zoning Regu- tions and in accordance lotions for the Coastal Area Planning District; and I been given opportunity WHEREAS, all interested parties have Board in public meeting assembled and to be heard by this the Board having considered all matters presented. I NOW, TkiEItEF'ORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County �etition of Commissioners of Collier County,&L •Flori, that the p Naples Bridge Club with respect to the property hereinafter described as: East 150 feet of Tract 75, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates as described inPlat Book 7, Page 57, public Records of Collier County, Florida EXHIBIT "N' Four Pages - --P L of. 2 Packet Page -1397- _........ ._. _------ __-' 5/10/2016 17.B. EXHIBIT C 4 of 22 , of be and the same is hereby approved for Provisional Use 6 the �E,�—.zonfng district for a social club subject to the followinq conditions: (SEE ATTACHED) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. resolu- offered the foregoing commissioner _ 1 4 ,--- — Wimer its adoption, secondeCommissar. by Commissar tion and moved and upon roll callt the vote was: AYES: ComndSsioners Brown, "mer and piston NAYS: Commissioners Aroher'and Wenzel ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: None ABSTENTION:. None Igo Done this ----8th _ day of Ju]. IY OR FLORIDA, COLLER COUNTjrFL ERIC Packet Page -1398- 5/10/2016 17.B. ^_ —" Packet Page EXHIBIT C 6 of 22 A'TTACMENT 1 5/10/2016 17.B. 1. public water required. 2. Comply with fire codes and hydrants - 1 3. Final site drainage plan shall be submitted to county Engineer for review and approval. 4. All signs.shall be approved by the Zoning biYector. 5. -provisional use expires one year from date of approval unless construction has commenced. 6. Any expansion requires site plan approval. See R-80-128 Packet Page -1400-- 5/10/2016 17.B. EXHIBIT C 7 of 22 RESOLUTION 94 -AU A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CONDITIONAL ME 112" IN THE KEN ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 2.2.3.3 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (ordinance No. 91-102) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WNERF.AS, the Collier County planning Commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability Of Conditional Use "2• of Subsection 2.2.3.3 in an "E" Estates zone for a social organization on the property hereinafter described, and bas found as a natter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made concerning all applicable matterc required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier county Planning commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by thin Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFOR$ BS IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Of Collier County, Florida that: -1- EXHIBIT "B" FOUR PAGES r Packet Page -1401--- EXHIBIT C 8of22 The petition filed by Fred Rathgeber representing Naples Bridge Center, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: The East 150 fact of 'tract 75, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 58, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use 612" of Subsection 2.2.3.3 of the *E* Estates zoning district for expansion of the Naples Bridge Center in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "B") and subject to the following conditions: 1. The current Planning !tanager may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the Conditional Use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this Conditional Use application, or major changes to the aite plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new conditional Use application, and shall comply with all applicable county ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102). 2. This project shall be required to most all County ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. 3. Detailed paving, grading, &its drainage, and utility plans shall be submitted to Project Plan Review for review. No construction permits shall be Leaned unless and until approval of the proposed construction in aeocrdanoe with the submitted plans is granted by i Project Plan Revise. 4. Prior to Site Development plan approval, a letter from the Collier County Public Realth Unit approving the existing septic system capacity shall be provided to Project Plan Review. 5. .all native vegetation (i.e., pines, palmettos, etc.) that Call within the interior landscape islands or can be retained for exterior or perimeter islands shall be retained. 6. No new median openings on Golden Gate parkway shall be provided to serve this project. 7. arterial level street lighting shall be provided by the Petitioner at the project entrance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the expanded building. s. A minimum radius of So teat shall be provided at both sides of the entrance drive. Collier county Transportation Services reserves the right to require an additional wastbound right turn lane if warranted by operational conditions. -2- Packet Page -1402- - 2^ PacketPage-1402-- 5/10/2016 17.B. 5/10/2016 17.B. I EXHIBIT C 9 of 22 9. An additional 40 Peet of depth along the entire frontage of the subject property shall be reserved for future road right -of -may purposes. No expansion of the existing drainfield shall be permitted within the 40 feet of depth. 10. Per the Collier County Land Development Code, all prohibited exotic species shall be removed from the site prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 11. The proposed draft well shall provide a minimum of 500 gallons per minute of water flow (Reterence: NFFA 1231 and Collier County Ordinance No. 92-72). 12. The Naples Bridge Center, Inc., shall not lease the facilities which are the subject of this Conditional Use to other organisations.for'a purpose different than that which is the purpose of the Naples Bridge Canter, Inc., in its articles of incorporation. 23. The Naples Bridge Center, Inc., agrees to participate in the cost of oonstructing an adequate potable water distribution transmission line along Golden Gate Parkway at such time as Collier County undertakes such a capital project. BE ST FMHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. Commissioner Norrie offered the foregoing Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by Comoissioner VOIpe and upon roll call, the vote vast AYES: Commissioner Norris,, Commissioner Volpe,, Commissioner Saunders,. !SAYS: Commissioner Matthews and Commissioner Constantine ABSENT AND NO? VOTING: ABSTENTION: Dona this 14th day of June , 2994. BOARDNG APPEAT.6 i BWA0,9 COLLI COMIM �/�RyI'-D71 :1.4i x Y STANTINE, DWIGHT -Z---, BROCKr_ CLERK _ .��ri:`.i �f •�i r�ii Al n APMV'Afl; ``•T-6 FORM AND LEGAL-. �� 66CY. L? MARJCMIE N. S.TUD') ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY CU -93-13 RESOLUTION/11693 -3- Packet Page -1403- 1w, EXHBfT C 10 of 22 s �w i -L ---"— ' -- Packet Page -1404- N. II tf R i 5/10/2016 17. B. 5/10/2016 17.B. EXHIBIT C 11 of 22 FINDINGS OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMSSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-200&AR-11034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes /No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow . and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No — C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: _4ZNo affect or Affect mitigated by <text> Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes NO Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval. DATE: i /�? CHAMMANfv'v - EXHIBIT uGo Packet Page -1405- EXHIBIT C 12 of 22 5/10/2016 17. B. I FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU -2006 -AR -11034 ne following facts are found: 1. Section 16.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely afftet other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of:' A. Consistency with the'Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes' ✓No B. -Ingress and egress to property and proposed strictures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequatt ingress & egres�1140 Yes C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to anise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district i - Yes x-/ No Based on the above findings, this conditional use. should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval. DATE: `7 MEMBER:0&-\,f ►�., EXHIBIT "C" -- - Packet Page -1406--- 5/10/2016 17.B." �XHIBI,T C 13 of 22 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING CONY USSION •' FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETTTION FOR CU -2006 -AR -11034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10,08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhoo d because of: ' A. Consistency with the Land Dev 1bpment Code and Growth Management Plan:. Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes 140 C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated b Y Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adj acent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district yes/N0 Based on the above findings, this conditional use. should, with stipulations, copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approvaL DATE: MEMBER EXE- IBI11C11 Page -1407- _. 5/10/201617.6. EXHIBIT C 14 of 22 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ' A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU -2006 -AR -11034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or. neighborhood i because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes � No i B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes'` No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval. DATE: `7"" I S - o MEMB I EXHIBIT 'V — Packet Page -1408- 5/10/201617.6. � EXHIBIT C 15 of 22 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMA11SSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU -2006 -AR -11034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land velopment Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effect eNo affect or Affect mitigated b g Y Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within distri Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval. yr` DATE: 0 MEMBER: EXHIBIT "Cu Packet Page-1409- 5/10/2016 17.B. EXHIBIT C 16 of 22 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU -2006 -AR -11034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land. Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land D opment Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects ne' boring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by __ _ Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval. DA IE: "l 1� - /1— 0 7 MEMBER: EXHIBIT "C„ .-Packet Page -1410--- 5/10/2016 17.13. EXHIBIT C 17 of 22 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU -2006 -AR -11034 The following facts are found: L. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of A. Consistency with the Land/Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes V No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress/ Yes No C. Affects'neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effe�,5: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within distr}et . Yes �// No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, wi stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval. DATE: �: ,1-1 MEMBER: EXHIBIT "C" ~� Packet Page -1411- 5/10/201617.6. EXHIBIT C 18 of 22 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION i FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU -2006 -AR -11034 The following facts are found: I . Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Flan: Yes No ice\ B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular i reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, -and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by ,Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes ✓ No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval. DATE:' / 7 MEMBER: — 7,0� EXHIBIT "C" Packet Page -1412- 5/10/2016 17.13. EXHIBIT C 19 of 22 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU -2006 -AR -11034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will. not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land. /Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yesy No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes Vl No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: V No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yesy No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval. DATE: % q MEMBER: 42 —41 EXHIBIT °C" Packet Page-1413- EXHIBIT C 20 of 22 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 5/10/2016 17.B. PR(JPERTY DESCfRIPTION (O.R 1574, PG. 943) THE EAST ••150 FEET OF TRACT 75, .GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 30, ACCORDING TO PLAT fN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58,,PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONTAINING 2,04 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD, EXHIBIT "M --- ' Packet Page -1414-- -- --- 5/10/2016 17.13. EXHIBIT C 21 of 22 uwmlw hmm" w PAVES M tC rwux RESIDENTIAL XSTATES-E ZONMJ RESIDENTIAL TY (ESTATES-I~ZONINGJ t _ �YF6ETAflim. a p f C • 1' pLou • r EKCidEG FKOMT- SETBACK ' Mrt•YFRM , '`n`;;: ,:?, :''~• O E O C(p� fil� ,r t it R:.• SEiSACKLOAM •: WESTLINE-TRACT TSOOLDENOATS OF ZXWT94 `• VEMETATKM + • i ESTATF.3,lAWT70. R: RESIDENTIAL JESTATES-E-ZONINOI _ :u;., • N. ~SETRAM ... . _'.. r.'� uwmlw hmm" w PAVES M tC rwux RESIDENTIAL XSTATES-E ZONMJ _ a p f C EKCidEG FKOMT- tt '`n`;;: ,:?, :''~• O E O C(p� fil� uwmlw hmm" w PAVES M tC rwux RESIDENTIAL XSTATES-E ZONMJ `—" Packet Page -1415- I �0 Aoo1 rys si'i i N F— m X W _ `� EKCidEG FKOMT- i... t; '`n`;;: ,:?, :''~• ,r SETBACK •: WESTLINE-TRACT TSOOLDENOATS •� rP�Y/l"_ r'+ TYPEa ESTATF.3,lAWT70. _.f �LL,Q� i•'� frsVFFM S SEMCK ~SETRAM A G LULL_ Wyi TY►E Y t i' W W _ � J.OWFFTR tgo __ ru A"%=J d = L=XTSM OF L_ IKL1ONfAY O d TNEt='nM WY/ALE DRAMRELO O I Type 'Ir �Y Lr SOFFEII . "aalw1a EE ON 1 GOLDEN GATE PKWY `—" Packet Page -1415- I �0 Aoo1 rys si'i i N F— m X W 5/10/2016 17.B. EXHIBIT C 22 of 22 CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOR CU-200&AR-11434 1. The Naples Bridge Center shall not lease the facilities which are the subject of this Conditional Use. 2. The applicant shall incorporate the outdoor lighting standards outlined in Golden Gate Area Master Plan Policy 5. 1.1 into the site plan during the SDP review process. 3. The applicant shall locate the dumpster a minimum of 40 feet away from any adjaocnt residential property line. EXHIBIT "F" G: Current/ Gundlach/ Conditional Uses/ Naples Bridge Center /Exhibit" F" Conditions 423-07 -- —Packet Page -1416-- 5/10/2016 17.13. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOR Naples Bridge Center, PL20150000873 1. The Naples Bridge Center shall not lease the facilities which are the subject of this Conditional Use. 2. The applicant shall incorporate the outdoor lighting standards outlined in Golden Gate Area Master Plan Policy 5.1. t into the site plan during the SDP review process. 3. The applicant shall locate the dumpster a minimum of 40 feet away from any adjacent residential property line. 4. The eastern 30 -foot wide buffer shall be planted with the materials of a Type "C" buffer. EXHIBIT "D" G: Current/ Gundlach/ Conditional Uses/ Naples Bridge Center /Exhibit "B" Conditions 1-27-16 Packet Page -1417- adeA3lnoe vaveaee d1Nvs 5/10/. -7.< aE oavA3inoe a31T100 Is6'tl'o aWAginDs a3mo0 la g <Y1 dip III � � 58 as � �` `s e W u, g ♦Yxairo lsY3 E m � � YYY555 i � �E H 5 U i y6 LLY1NYld dei[ by »lttt aaVn3lnOs v 3 ~�"Vse Z vaY axYs vs VINVS aavAmnos "vSa Y1NYS gg 0 nA bW £`<Sm €q �a a m m ypj Co U 3 > BB o <y My - O SL-31V1Sa31N1 Y � a m ur _ '{�c5 S J Q CL 531Y153 Oa3BN311B/11 aa3eN3uaw, 31xad NYoaa �b s q � g3— tlfRONMI - z w � xs Ls wes In zi 0 B g 6 iv OVOa NOLSONIAII Co a y Z.. N N R R 6 ip- Op gb �4 g z . Page -1418- as NOT11Wo .-..mnd-laOdall 8 � a B a • s a Ms is Moo a 31YJS O110N / 7 Imw AL 2016 17.B. c r C L C C aE oavA3inoe a31T100 Is6'tl'o aWAginDs a3mo0 la g <Y1 dip III � � 58 as � �` `s e W u, g ♦Yxairo lsY3 E m � � YYY555 i � �E H 5 U i y6 LLY1NYld dei[ by »lttt aaVn3lnOs 3 ~�"Vse vaY axYs vs VINVS aavAmnos "vSa Y1NYS gg WR nA bW £`<Sm €q m m ypj BB o <y My l NSW uNnoo SL-31V1Sa31N1 a m ur _ '{�c5 531Y153 Oa3BN311B/11 aa3eN3uaw, 31xad NYoaa �b q � g3— tlfRONMI Wj W In zi OVOa NOLSONIAII � �n W Yiw y Z.. N N PDX iirc n�Wa-ii{ 6 I 15� ip- Op gb �4 g Packet Page -1418- as NOT11Wo .-..mnd-laOdall 2016 17.B. c r C L C C GOLREN GATE NQ K- I N i 0 3P w SCALE: 1" = 60' LEGEND REVISED 03/17/2016 NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, INC. © GradyMinor cmn r:"cmccn Tann s"y"rA - - CONDITIONAL USE Packet Page -1419- CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN er i or 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TRANSCRIPT OF THE NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER CONDITIONAL USE AND GMPA NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING December 14, 2015 5:30 p.m. Appearances: WAYNE ARNOLD ED KANT SUE FAULKNER NANCY GUNDLACH SHARON UMPENHOUR Packet Page -1420 5/10/2016 17.B. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5/10/2016 17.B. 2 MR. ARNOLD: All right. Good evening, everybody. I'm Wayne Arnold of GradyMinor, and this is Sharon Umpenhour from our office. She'll be recording the neighborhood meeting. It looks like most of the folks here are either staff or the Bridge Center. I know we have Russell Tuff (phonetic) from the Golden Gate Civic Association tonight, and then a neighbor, Vlad (phonetic), I think is your name. So we have two members of the public that I'll try to address what we're going through in the process and then open it up for some questions and probably exchange (indiscernible). Do you think my voice is okay? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah (indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Okay. The process we're going through is a two-step process. We're actually amending the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow a conditional use to be approved on the eastern -most parcel that we have here. The Bridge Center bought that property and is seeking to expand the facilities on the existing tract that we're sitting in, but we would limit then, through the conditional use, improvements on this part of the Packet Page -1421- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5/10/2016 17.B. 3 property to parking. This is kind of the concept plan we're working from, showing an expansion of the Bridge Center that would be authorized through the conditional use and the plan amendment language, limiting ourselves to a maximum of 15,000 total square feet. It's a little bit bigger than the proposed expansion that they're looking at, but really wanting to make sure that if they need to make minor incremental changes in the future, that they don't have to come back through this process every time. And then this is the property that's to the east that we're adding as part of the conditional use in the plan amendment, and we've limited ourselves to preserve open space and parking uses on that site. None of the physical building improvements supporting the Bridge Center would be located there. And also made a provision for a small maintenance building to be built in the future, just to allow the Bridge Center to maintain its property. So the process we're in, we've had one sufficiency round of comments from the county Packet Page -1422- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5/10/2016 17.B. 4 staff. They've asked for some technical things related to the comprehensive plan. Zoning, I don't think we have any significant issues of any kind, but for our neighbor, we're calling that a minimum 30 -foot wide vegetative buffer along our eastern boundary adjacent to you. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Is it set in stone? Is it fixed, like, you know, you aren't going to change it to, say, 20 or 50 in the future? MR. KANT: No. I can sit here and represent that I told you 30. It's going to be at least 30. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, and we don't have the details of that. We just simply called it, for this purpose, as a vegetative buffer, but if there's additional dialogue between you and Mr. Kant or any of the Bridge members, you know, certainly let us know if there's details there that you need. But that process that we're going through, again, that's a comp -- small scale plan amendment and a conditional use. We don't have any hearing dates established. We kind of went through those loosely with the comprehensive planning staff today, and we would hope to get through this Packet Page -1423- 5/10/2016 17. B. 5 1 process maybe April or May time frame in the 2 spring, but, of.course, like any of you who have 3 seen them, we'll post zoning signs. You're within 4 the noticed radius where you will get a letter 5 indicating that there's an upcoming public hearing. 6 And then with the Civic Association, I know 7 that the -- some of the Bridge representatives have 8 met with your group and I think we had a pretty 9 positive outcome, but if we need to come and make a 10 presentation to your group at some point, you know, 11 if you'd let us know, we'd be happy to come back 12 and do that once some of these details are flushed 13 out. 14 That's really kind of what we're doing. 15 I think I forgot to introduce Nancy Gundlach. 16 MS. GUNCLACH: Hi. 17 MR. ARNOLD: She's the planner handling the 18 conditional use application. 19 And then we have Sue Faulkner, who is here 20 from comprehensive planning handling the small 21 scale amendment. 22 And for the amendment to the comp plan, 23 there's -- just so everybody is aware, there was a 24 prohibition on more conditional uses and commercial 25 development on the Parkway. So we're amending that Packet Page -1424- 1 2 3 4 61 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 0x 23 24 25 5/10/2016 17.B. C section to allow this to be an exempted site. It was different than, Vlad, you may remember like the David Lawrence Center, they kind of created their own district and road standards. We're looking to really create our standards through the conditional use process, so just a little different, but the same result at the end of the day. It allows us to expand on the existing property and then put our parking, water management, open space on the other parcel. It's really -- I think that's it, in a nutshell. I mean, I'm happy to answer any questions that you may have. I know members of the board, you may not have been as plugged in as Ed has been, but happy to field any questions from anybody, or if you have questions of staff. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Will the rear of the -- will the rear of the property be taken -- the vegetation taken off to create the swale? MR. ARNOLD: Some of it will. We're proposing to -- the county has a native vegetation retention requirement. And they told us that we need about .4 acres, so a little under half an acre. This plan represents about half an hour of native vegetation preservation, and we're keeping most of Packet Page -1425- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5/10/2016 17.B. that along the back side, but behind what's been previously cleared. And then we're not calling preserve adjacent on this so we can treat it as a landscape buffer. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I see. MR. KANT: However, if I might interject, one of the things that we want to try to do is to keep as much of this native as possible the way it is, maybe get rid of some of the wild stuff, the peppers and that type of thing, but, frankly, it's to our advantage to do that because it's just that much less we're going to have to spend on re -vegetating, you know, to get that landscape buffer. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. MR. KANT: So we want to try to keep as much of what's in there natural as we can. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Was that expected to be water retention, then? MR. ARNOLD: Well, the area back here, we're calling that as probable water management area. We can use parts of landscape buffers for water management, but Mike Dowlett (phonetic), one of our engineers, is actually working on the site development plan and looking at how we're going to Packet Page -1426- 5/10/2016 17.B. 1 treat that 30 feet, and I don't think we have to 2 rely on it for water management. Maybe some 3 conveyance from collecting some of it to bring it 4 back here, but not much of it. 5 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay. 6 MR. ARNOLD: If any. We're not quite there 7 yet. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1.1 MR. KANT: Yeah, probably, I would think -- well Thur -- again, I don't know that it's germane to this meeting, but we have a meeting, preliminary pre -app set up for Thursday afternoon with the county to talk about the site development plan, and at that point, we hope to get a little bit better handle on, you know, how much are they going to look for water management, you know, what type of water management features. But our biggest change from a water management point of view is the parking area. And that may drive what type of surface we use. It might drive what type of islanding, curbing and things like that, or lack thereof, that we need to do. So, you know, that's really down the road at this point. MR. ARNOLD: Anything else? (Indiscernible)? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. I'll just add Packet Page -1427- /'t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5/10/2016 17.B. 0 that I would like to, you know, have that 30 -foot wide vegetative buffer the way it is. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Because I do have a pool there. I would like to keep privacy -- MR. ARNOLD: Uh-huh. Sure. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: -- on that side of the piece of property. MR. ARNOLD: Right. Understood. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So, yeah, I mean I would appreciate if you just kept it the way it is. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. To the extent we can. I mean, if there's Brazilian pepper (indiscernible) going to have to come off. MR. KANT: Yeah, if there's Brazilian pepper (indiscernible) going to be removed. Yeah, we have to. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, take that out, yeah, yeah, yeah. MR. KANT: And then if we have to, we only wind up (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I (indiscernible) taken out when I -- because it's -- I have breakouts and it's just -- that stuff is very annoying. Packet Page -1428- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Its] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5/10/2016 17.B. 10 MR. ARNOLD: Hey, Norm. MR. KANT: I want to make sure that it's clear in this public meeting, it's not a public hearing, but this public meeting, that we have represented to Mr. Amuloff (phonetic) that that would be a 30 -foot vegetative buffer. And we have no intention of changing that. I can't say that it's going to be 30.00 -- 30 feet, point zero zero inches. It might be, you know, 30 feet and one inch, it might be 29 feet, 11 and three-quarters inches, but it's going to be 30 feet, especially (indiscernible). And, unfortunately, it is so thick in there, until we start doing some clearing, I'm not sure what we're going to find, so. What I wanted to protect against is us having to spend money to plant where there's already good plantings. That's what I wanted to protect against. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Well, it sounds like you like it the way it is now, anyway, so if a minimal amount has to come out because it's foreign, that's what we take out. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. Packet Page -1429- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ON 5/10/2016 17.B. 11 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And this is your, like, maximum footprint of that parking lot, right? So you may actually decide to build something smaller (indiscernible). MR. KANT: That's correct. Yeah -- MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, we're in the design stages right now, trying to -- between working with the architect, who the Bridge Center has retained, and trying to do the site design. Like Ed said, once we go to our pre -application meeting with the county staff, we'll be able to go back and refine that. I mean, I can't tell you that we're not going to make some of the -- this is going to be maybe a redesign area, and to make up some of the parking that we may lose here, we may end up putting another tier of parking back here or something, but -- MR. KANT: Yeah, I just -- I want to make it clear that what we're showing here is both what's here now and what we anticipated when this was done in -- in March -- no, in September, three months ago. We may -- we may be able to narrow those down a bit. We want to, because I know we're talking Packet Page -1430- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5/10/2016 17.B. 12 about changing the traffic flow so that we get more of a one-way type of flow through here. When we do that, we may not need all of this much island, in which case we might be able to pull that in a little bit, but I don't want to make that promise to you now. I just don't know. What I will make the representation to you now is that's 30 feet. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Sounds good. MR. ARNOLD: All right. Anything else (indiscernible)? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, just as the Golden Gate Civic Association, we had voted to -- in favor of the concept, and they were good neighbors, and we've appreciated what they've done in making it good, and so we were favorable, and that was, unless there was some objections from residential, but we like the idea. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. Good. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thought it was a good use of (indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. I think that we've had that dialogue with the county. It makes so much Packet Page -1431- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5/10/2016 17.B. 13 sense, with the infrastructure that's in place, to build on what's here, and they've been good neighbors for 30 plus years, so that's why we're all pursuing this avenue. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Unless (indiscernible) but I didn't bring the letter and I did look for it quick, but I think we wrote a letter in support (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes. Yes, we did. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) more detail than that if we need it. MR. ARNOLD: Anything else? Vlad, Russell? Okay. Anybody else? Meeting adjourned. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thank you. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I also move (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thank you. MR. ARNOLD: Good timing, huh? (Recording concluded.) Packet Page -1432- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 14 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 W 23 24 25 5/10/2016 W.B. 14 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I, Joyce B. Howell, do hereby certify that: 1. The foregoing pages numbered 1 through 13 contain a full, true and correct transcript of proceedings in the above -entitled matter, transcribed by me to the best of my knowledge and ability from a digital audio recording. 2. I am not counsel for, related to, or employed by any of the parties in the above -entitled cause. 3. I am not financially or otherwise interested in the outcome of this case. SIGNED AND CERTIFIED: Joyce B. Howell Packet Page -1433- Date: December 21, 2015 5/10/2016 17.B. Packet Page -1434- All z D r m J) z m N 5/10/2016 17.B. PUBLIC NOTICE P U J3L1U .N U 171;rJ r v DLJlI. lv NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on May 10, 2016, commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of.County Commissioner's Chamber, Third Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE N0, 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,' FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE GOLDEN GATEAREA MASTER PLAN AND GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP BY REVISING THE CONDITIONAL USES SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION AND EXPANSION OF THE NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 4.68 ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL201500025251,CPWI 2015-3] AND A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE WHICH ALLOWS A' SOCIAL CLUB IN THE ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.01.B.1.c.2, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER LOCATED AT 5865.GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [CU-PL20150000873] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL., between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples;:one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Tuesday, May 10, 2016 will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim; record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DONNA FIALA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Ann Jennejohn Deputy Clerk (SEAL) No 1046262 Aori120 2016 Packet Page-1435- PARKWAY 'ONE.6l PROMENADE OP NAPLES GOLDEN GATE ESTATES OP JAYCEES CLUBHOUSE UNIT 30 JAGARANOA �T.Q 3D 29 CENTER Q GOLDEN GATE ESTATES 28 OUNDERS PLAZA UNIT 29 cOLQNADES AT PLACE SANTA 808ARA PLACE W PARKWAY PARMIER BERKSHIRE LAKES HERON (pry) LAKEs INTERSTATE•75 r�z 32 33 LoGREENBERKSHNiE ERON (C.R. 856) RADIO ROAD r7� All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL., between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples;:one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Tuesday, May 10, 2016 will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim; record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DONNA FIALA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Ann Jennejohn Deputy Clerk (SEAL) No 1046262 Aori120 2016 Packet Page-1435-