The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Backup 06/02/2016 COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING BACKUP DOCUMENTS JUNE 2, 2016 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., JUNE 2,2016, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER,THIRD FLOOR,3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST,NAPLES,FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. NOTICE: ITEM 9D.THE ARCHITECTURAL LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS, WILL BE HEARD AFTER ALL OF THE LAND USE PETITIONS AND BEFORE 3 PM. THEREAFTER, IT WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 21,2016 and May 5,2016 6. BCC REPORT-RECAPS 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA 1 9. ADVERTSDED PUBLIC HEARINGS: Note: This item has been continued from the April 21,2016 CCPC meeting and again from the May S.2016 CCPC meeting: A. PUDZ-PL20140002809: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance no. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Mobile Home (MH) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Highview Roost Road RPUD to allow development of up to 60 single-family detached dwelling units or 86 single-family attached dwelling units on property located on Roost Road, south of Manatee Road in Section 11, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 21.59+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach,AICP,RLA,Principal Planner] B. PUDi.PL20150001613: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2014-34, the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 12.17± acres of land zoned Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD; by adding 48 residential dwelling units for a total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding 150 group housing units for a total of 500 group housing units; by amending the master plan; by repealing Ordinance No. 11-18, the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD; and by providing an effective date. The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Learning Lane and Livingston Road, in Section 13,Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 40.55±acres. [Coordinator: Eric Johnson,AICP,CFM, Principal Planner] C. PUDZ-PL20140000890: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district for a project known as the Onyx RPUD to allow development of up to 48 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16,Township 50 South,Range 26 East,Collier County, Florida, consisting of 8.72± acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 06-53 and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator:Eric Johnson,AICP,CFM,Principal Planner] D. An ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the comprehensive land regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County,Florida, by providing for: Section One, Recitals; Section Two, Findings of Fact; Section Three, Adoption of Amendments to the Land Development Code to make comprehensive changes to architectural and site design standards,more specifically amending the following:Chapter Two — Zoning Districts and Uses, including section 2.03.06 Planned Unit Development Districts; Chapter Four — Site Design and Development Standards, including section 4.02.12 Design Standards for Outdoor Storage, section 4.02.16 Design Standards for Development in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, section 4.02.37 Design Standards for Development in the 2 Golden Gate Downtown Center Commercial Overlay District(GGDCCO),section 4.02.38 Specific Design Criteria for Mixed Use Development Within C-1 Through C-3 Zoning Districts, section 4.05.02 Design Standards, section 4.05.04 Parking Space Requirements, section 4.05.09 Stacking Lane Requirements, section 4.06.02 Buffer Requirements, section 4.06.03 Landscaping Requirements for Vehicular Use Areas and Rights-of-Way, section 4.06.05 General Landscaping Requirements;Chapter Five—Supplemental Standards,including section 5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards; Chapter Six—Infrastructure Improvements and Adequate Public Facilities Requirements, including section 6.06.02 Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements,section 6.06.03 Streetlights; Chapter Ten — Application, Review, and Decision-Making Procedures, including section 10.02.15 Requirements for Mixed Use Projects Within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area; Section Four, Conflict and Severability; Section Five, Inclusion in the Collier County Land Development Code; and Section Six, Effective Date. [Jeremy Frantz, Senior Planner] 9. OLD BUSINESS A. Discussion concerning deviations [Wafaa Assaad] B. Discussion concerning exotics in the Estates[Stan Chrzanowski] 10. NEW BUSINESS 11. PUBLIC COMMENT 12. ADJOURN CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows/jmp 3 CCPC April 21, 2016 PUDZ-PL2014O0 )28O9 Highview Roost ' Load RPUD March 22, 2016 Collier County Planning Commission Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on April 1, 2016, and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner in the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the folio In*, on ALL Invoices: DIVISION:ZONING [Zoning Services Section] FUND& COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 PS • Account umb r: 068779 e)O(0/ Authori d Designee signature for CCPC Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,April 21, 2016,on the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance no. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Mobile Home (MH)zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district for the project known as Highview Roost Road RPUD to allow development of up to 60 single-family detached dwelling units or 86 single-family attached dwelling units on property located on Roost Road, south of Manatee Road in Section 11, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 21.59+/-acres; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20140002809] (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to Thursday,April 21, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman xi D COLLIER BOULEVARD rn cn 4 N (S.R. 951) ,m O � ��Z -o > N3^ XI '71 mpy O W ND r z � V) ..A 0 zN 0� cn m m rz O �O� N D (n C) N 1i nAm MO-0 \ m >> IfTTii N D r OOmI ,� ximz _xj um C � �y IA' Filo oD 1rn N 0JZp r c00 Po 77 m z m 0 `.u) 0 m m V ��_4 0 y D ^ Do A Z z _ `J N -i r- N O rn q m rn tA m <o � Z n < 7) 2 y m 0 -ID mm n� > mD vii m 1 Nr Acct. #565868 (Old Acct. #068779) March 22, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples News Media Group 1100 Immokalee Rd. Naples, Florida 34110 Re: PUDZ-PL20140002809, Highview Roost Road RPUD Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Friday, April 1, 2016, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500161942 March 22, 2016 Collier County Planning Commission Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on April 1, 2016, and furnish proof of publication to the attention of the Board's Minutes and Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suit e401, Naples, FL 34112. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section] FUND & COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number: 068779 Authorized Designee signature for CCPC Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, April 21, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL., to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Mobile Home (MH) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Highview Roost Road RPUD to allow development of up to 60 single-family detached dwelling units or 86 single-family attached dwelling units on property located on Roost Road, south of Manatee Road in Section 11, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 21.59+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20140002809] (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to Thursday, April 21, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman cpm 4 COLLIER BOULEVARD _ P1m N (S.R. 951) \ 0D pow < X KZ mD O- pl m0 m0D OM W - r zC Oor o z � �3 (n m DZ �O� N D � m cn D v N (.1) (7 m 2 mmoo <� mW >D 00m— mrirri xi xj N 6 ii �y D >, 0 D 1 mril o N 2 m 0 � n �mZ S Al u) 0 x N 2 .c` m 73 m m V \1� / O —0 � � z z � � mN O cn rn m cn tA -•c°) I. z —I m p C7 xi 2 m D xi -I D m m n� > �D M m I `I) Martha S. Vergara From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 4:10 PM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: RE: PUDZ-PL201400002809 (CCPC - Highview Roost Rd RPUD) Confirmed receipt. Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist 0: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.goriNaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 . 'aptcs Dant; , Ec From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent:Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:31 PM To: Legals NDN <legals@naplesnews.com> Subject: PUDZ-PL201400002809 (CCPC- Highview Roost Rd RPUD) Hello, Please advertise the following attached ad Friday, April 1, 2016 (display ad w/map). Please forward an ok when received, if you have any questions feel free to call me. Thanks, Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Dept. Clerk of the Circuit Court & Value Adjustment Board Office: (239) 252-7240 Fax: (239) 252-8408 E-mail: martha.vergara@collierclerk.com Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient,you must not copy,distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. Unless expressly stated,opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailing helpdesk@collierclerk.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents.The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility for any 1 Martha S. Vergara From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 4:14 PM To: Martha S.Vergara Subject: RE: PUDZ-PL201400002809 (CCPC - Highview Roost Rd RPUD) Hi Martha! Please keep using the old account numbers until advise otherwise. The new account number on the insertion is wrong. Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist 0: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.goriNaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 Naples i 1 efts - corn From: Martha S.Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent:Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:31 PM To: Legals NDN <legals@naplesnews.com> Subject: PUDZ-PL201400002809 (CCPC- Highview Roost Rd RPUD) Hello, Please advertise the following attached ad Friday, April 1, 2016 (display ad w/map). Please forward an ok when received, if you have any questions feel free to call me. Thanks, Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Dept. Clerk of the Circuit Court & Value Adjustment Board Office: (239) 252-7240 Fax: (239) 252-8408 E-mail: martha.vergara@collierclerk.com Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be 1 Martha S. Vergara From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:31 AM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: Proof 1006000 Attachments: N D N B 1006000.pdf Find proof attached for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist 0: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.gori(cNaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 tkii1 ; "' Vit- c m 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, April 21, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL., to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No.2004-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Mobile Home (MH) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Highview Roost Road RPUD to allow development of up to 60 single-family detached dwelling units or 86 single-family attached dwelling units on property located on Roost Road, south of Manatee Road in Section 11, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 21.59+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20140002809] FALLING \\v,/ WATERS J BEACH I :ESORT WINDING CYPRESS NAPLES RESERVE (DRI) EAGLE 3 2 1 CREEK ARTESA POINTE l,9'Niqq 2DE1 NAPLES / ARGO /0 WALNUT OACH iirfMANATEE LAKES RnGEESRESORT (P) •""Q p'/ PROJECT S W X o N 10 11 LOCATION co ASGBUSINESS X12 PARADISE CTR. OF NAPLES POINRTE SILVER LAKES MARCO SHORES/ PCOS.T I FIDDLER'S CREEK dfESTATES All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to Thursday,April 21, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252- 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman No.1006000 April 1.2016 Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:34 AM To: Rodriguez, Wanda; Ashton, Heidi; Gundlach, Nancy; BeasleyRachel (RachelBeasley@colliergov.net) Subject: PUDZ-PL20140002809 Highview Roost Rd RPUD Attachments: NDNB1006000.pdf Morning All, Attached is the ad proof from NDN, please review and let me know of any changes. Thanks, Martha Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:04 AM To: Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: RE: PUDZ-PL20140002809 Highview Roost Rd RPUD Thanks Wanda! From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:00 AM To: Martha S. Vergara Cc: Ashton, Heidi; Gundlach, Nancy; BeasleyRachel Subject: RE: PUDZ-PL20140002809 Highview Roost Rd RPUD Looks good, thanks. Wanda Rodriguez, .ACP .Advanced Certified Paralegal- Office of the County .Attorney (239)252-8400 From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara©collierclerk.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:34 AM To: RodriguezWanda; AshtonHeidi; GundlachNancy; BeasleyRachel Subject: PUDZ-PL20140002809 Highview Roost Rd RPUD Morning All, Attached is the ad proof from NDN, please review and let me know of any changes. Thanks, Martha Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Martha S. Vergara From: Gori,Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:06 AM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: RE: Proof 1006000 Thanks, released. Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist 0: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.gori@NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 NaPie . aitll Nous NarAesNews,corn From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:05 AM To: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: RE: Proof 1006000 Ivonne, The legal department has reviewed and approved this ad, please proceed with publishing as requested. Thanks, Martha From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori©naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:31 AM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: Proof 1006000 Find proof attached for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist 0: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.gori(a�NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 44, NapiesNews, ;.gym Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com 1 ,. . neo Battu wwE1 NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that I he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 1006000 PUBLIC HEARING 45-161942 Pub Dates April 1,2016 2 i a,n....eP ie.( e---r.77 (Signure of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me 1 , �'��;,,, IVONNE GORI 0 This April 07, 16 4 �t1 Notary Public State o1 Florida 0 1 � •g Commission #�FF 900070 0 ec?= My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 4.iii 1 .:o' Bonded through National Notary Assn. /MI 4., 4101101IPTIP•1119•MM"IrRIP411•WIIIIITII (Signatur of affiant) ' 6A1 Friday,April 1,20161 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Immok- ��, Florida judge High - `- Reprimand accepted for punishing victim School - TM Associated Press sistant general counsel,said the Supreme biology Court will now decide whether it will ac- teacher -- ORIANOO—A Central Florida judge who cept or reject the agreement.If the Su- Eric Y jailed a domestic violence victim for not preme Court accepts the recommenda- Mazurka- showing up to testify against her alleged tion,Collins will have to appear before E wit said __ `"" ' Imo. - hist st summer has agreed she anted the state's top court in Tallahassee to be winning ;�/, M in poor judgment and will accept punish- formally reprimanded. a 2016 '*' •" '� mens. The case drew public attention when it Golden jfe r Seminole County Judge Jerri Coffins was fust made public in October after an filApple ' ;,*, and the Florida Judicial Qualifications Orlando tel station broadcast the Q award -- ¢ - Commission reached a plea agreement six-minute hearing and a complaint was C) validates I. - ' i of a public reprimand for her actions after formally charged against Collins,54,for Ci Z his *ii charges were formally made Wednesday violating fom of seven ethical standards teaching "- > .' with the Florida Supreme Court. codes contained in the Florida code of C) re methods. i During a July 30 hearing,Collins sen- judicial conduct. C h�. slur tented the crying Lake Mary woman to Collins became upset and berated the '� LLl ' three days in)ail for contempt. victim after she skipped out on asubpoe- C = A, Alex Williams,the commission's as- na to testify against her accuser. N U TEACHER AWARDS DINNER What:The Golden Apple recipients will be q CD Q J honored at the 26th annual Golden Apple 0 a m Mazurkewitz began to record his lectures Celebration of Teachers Dinner presented 1 +rut mom"-"• in 10-minute videos he posts onYottltibe. by the Suncoast Credit Union Foundation. .---- EB � '� (' I. +a 1'' a Z Z Q d He said his students can watch and re- When:8 p.m.Friday III ' I watch them on then own time,allowing Whereo Naples Beach Hotel&Golf Club I E1� - ' ] I ' III him tome classroom time to interact with Tickets:www.Champ ion s For Learning. .sew 'aB�F d' rrer his students. org/GA 9f. . •• "For kids who are less motivated,we (lnTV:NBC-2 at8p.m.Friday Ncan make this into a fun environment," The Boys&Girls Club in lmmokalee will have 26,008 square feet of space,under current plans. he said. Cl) Another practice Mazurkewitz was this with my kids,they're like,'How did KIDS'CLUB self-confidence and help- here in our town is crucial C honored for reflects his own trajectory this guy from Long Island end up here,ofmg those who endeavor to families,and we are from 3A O while teaching. all places,in lmmokalee?' to help themselves despite proud to help build the N When his students make mistakes,he 'It's serendipitous.Fm not abig believ- circumstances that might new facility." strives to give them opportunities tore- er that things happen for a reason,but it its operations with about otherwise disadvantage The campus will have 0) visit their work by submitting responses. really worked out:' $1.7 million each year. them,"Susan Belch said a youth development con- C) '— Missteps are revisited for class credit. Mazurkewitz said the Golden Apple Inmid-March,theorga- in a news release. ter,where the Boys&Girls co C "I tell them,'OK,what are you now go- award is affirmation of his teaching meth- nization received a gift of On Thursday,another Club's signature programs � IZ ing to do about it?How are you going to ods. $3 million from Susan and big donation was dis- will take place;a kitchen; � '' Q learn from your mistakes;"he said. "Teaching is one of these jobs where Carl Belch Jr.toward the closed.The local Boys& an education and career A native of Long Island,Mazurkewitz when you're in it,you have your head naming of the Immokalee Girls Club said it received center;an arts center;a 0) C O .1.= went to college in upstate New York to down,you don't!mow until you look back campus,which is planned a$1 million donation for gym;a teen center;a game ' Cl.) ..,= o study biology. at the end of the year,"he said."How do to have 26,000 square feet the center from Lipman room;and several class- "'never ehanj<pdmajors,never thought we know?Kids are doing well on a test. of space. Family Farms. rooms and computer labs. V C) 0) CD twice,"he said. Well,what if it wasn't hard enough? The Bolches are Naples "We are anlmmokalee- "We want to focus on Q < Cf) 0 Mazurkewitz interned for a biotech "It was validation that,OK,what I'm residents and owners of based company,and we the social and emotional firm and hoped to follow that route. doing is working." RaceTrac Petroleum, a take pride in our local needs of children first; "But I graduated in 2007,right around This feedback from his students,Ma- third-generation fam- community,"said Jaime Shaw said. the economic meltdown,"he said."The zurkewitz said,is a source of support.A ily business that operates Weisinger,a member of "If you can get those company I interned for said,'Hey,we're couple of years ago,Mazurkewitz began more than 700 gasoline the Lipman family and di- met and help them over- ina hiring freeze,'" finding flashcards with anonymous words stations and convenience rector of community and come obstacles they have, He spent the next few years playing of encouragement for him.He still keeps stores throughout the government relations for you see that they want to with his band,Testing for Echo. the cards Southeast,including 10 in Lipman Family Farms. learn." C "There's music videos out there that "Once every couple of weeks,I would Naples. "We are excited to see Naming opportunities kids like to pull up,"he said. find these,"he said,grabbing the stack "We believe that the our investment directly ranging from$25,000 to Mazurkewitz followed his now-wife to from his desk."One says,'Thanks for mission of the BGCCC benefit the students of Im- $1 million are available for In Florida and began teaching atlmmokalee teaching from your heart,not a book.' comports with our family mokalee,"Weisinger said. classrooms,an art room, (N High. "When they are doing things like this... values that support hard "Giving the BGCCC a a dance studio,computer O "It's funny,because when I talk about those are moments that stick out." work,education,building permanent home right labs and offices. O X O PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE c < V Q NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING r Z tit ZCiliSH • WISH NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning L Commission at 9:00 AM.,on Thursday,April 21,2016,in the Board of County -0 Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami E Trail East,Naples FL.,to consider: Wi An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida a) Z •co l i amending Ordinance No.2004-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development - , - Code,which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated E C T area of Collier County,Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or Omaps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property 3 f ~ NOW IS THE TIME TO GET TOP DOLLAR! from a Mobile Home(MH)zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)zoning district for the project known as Highview Roost Road RPUD to allow Z MOO NI o Our International Clientele is Waiting to Buy! development of up to 60 single-family detached dwelling units or 86 single-family EstateAll Jewelry •Watches attached dwelling units on property located on Roost Road,south of Manatee Road Q C (/) 0 •Diamonds . Jewelry • in Section 11,Township 51 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida,consisting •Gold •Rare Coins •Rolex Watches •Silver of 21.59,1-acres;and by providing en effective date.IPUDZ-PL201400028091 •Platinum •Color Stones •Pocket Watches •Crystal I •Antiques •Designer Apparel •Designer Handbags •Furniture `r ,uazia.. •Pearls •Music Boxes •Fine Art •Cameos •Sterling •Foreign Coins •Paper Money •Furs a.11414. •China •Costume Jewelry •Cuff links •Fire Arms '4111liNI:s224- o.,, r r+: •Angling Gear•Musical Instruments •High End Accessories •Military Memorabilia 9 s.� LOCATION ALL VALUABLE PERSONAL PROPERTY , $ I • Celebrating 41 Years in Business! i "'�i, -`1 orrez \�� ` inE Michael A.Joyce Denise A.Joyce All Interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed 0 •Numismatist •International Society of Appraisers ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collar County Clerk's office, U ,^ •Precious Metals Trader •MastAppraiser / fourth floor,Coll er County Government Center,3299 Tammml Trail East,Suite 401, (,♦F W •Professional Numismatic Guild •Gem I g [ Naples FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed t tlfi ism •Life Member Fwith the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section prior to Thursday,April 21,2016. ++ 0 •Lite Member Silver Dollar Roundtable If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning N WECONDUCT TERNATONAL AUCTIONS! - Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will ZINTERNATIONAL AUCTIONS! need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a U) ' WE WILL GET YOU TOP DOLLAR! verbatim record of the proceedings is made,witch record Includes the testimony and CU evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. ( O_ r•C OO ASTV If you area person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cast to you,to the provision of certain assistance.Please contact the Collar County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamlaml Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252- a miLa 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing �i /� Coin :} f (a impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. tla I T'� i &W Florida's Cold,Sliver,DhauIontl,Rare Cele s Real Estate Exchange Collier County Planning Commission tri Since Bonita Springs ,Fort Myerst Mark Strain,Charman ttd 1 //�i�ai[[ 23n-333-20.10 1975 'a 229-g...39-6626 Ne,rOoe000 Auri11.2016 Zint `v t�t Lim z_ w O CC aY Q z w w = 0 En LU CC UJ W cc Oo l=- _ > >- w = F- p CC m § J zo W a cc Z w w J 2 ill 0 U c~nE5 En z > Z c 1'Lu cc Ow a 2i O O W Jz a cca a � - O QCCOO w = Cn 1- I— w a a C Cn CC J I ® � /) O � o ¢ O wJ Q � O z ccDo Q o0 w C� HUd O ocn o H � aN- w0ZoO CC 0 CV cco ALL 0 V - U- a J N ¢ mz � 0ww -I Q a 9Ili w 0 0 0 = ol- I- CC 0cn H N Pn N z z = cc (r O ami zWp � J W E zcrcc � cnw m a3 U = ¢ mO 00 I- vi O O = cn cc W b. a a wcc l- WQ = cc OO �" CD O 0 ~ 0 z w U O MI"- zcc — a _ w = ate un-- M ¢ i_ m ^ m0 aC cnzz �% o1- w O cri= � z W 0 L9 m CC p O W j oz zw w 0—, '3 zv I— 0c M O zz w ( z 0 Z \ aw H z. (n w o o ~ m wm U O cc > MCC Q J ) oQ a J of-= ` z � Q C •4 = Om C D wO > J N d J} a n Z cc 6, 2. i& ccd-C EXHIBIT A 14-em 61.A List of Permitted Uses ? Vat n S 5 G Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development Regulations for development of the Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the Land Development Code(LDC)and Growth Management Plan(GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. MAXIMUM DENSITY: There shall be no more than 60 single-family detached dwelling units, or 86 single-family attached dwelling units,permitted on the±21.59 gross acres,resulting in a maximum density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre. PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Single-family, detached 2. Single-family, attached 3. Single-family, zero lot line 4. Temporary Model homes 5. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures, private garages, and other recreational facilities. 2. Gatehouses and other access control structures. 3. Project sales, construction and administrative offices that may occur in residential and/or temporary structures. Page 1 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 EXHIBIT A List of Permitted Uses Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development 4. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. IL RECREATIONAL AREA A. Principal Uses: 1. Structures intended to provide social and recreational space for the private use of the residents and their guests. 2. Outdoor recreation facilities,such as a community swimming pool,tennis and basketball courts, playgrounds, pedestrian/bicycle pathways, and water features. 3. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos, park benches and walking trails. 4. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos, park benches and walking trails. 2. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. Page 2 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 EXHIBIT B Development Standards �-. Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for the land uses within the Highview Roost Road RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP) or subdivision plat. 1. Guardhouses, gatehouses, access control structures, clock towers, columns, decorative hardscaping or architectural embellishments associated with the project's entrance, features are permitted within the "R" designated area abutting the project's entrance or within the private roadway as depicted on the PUD Master Plan, and shall have no required setbacks; however, such structures cannot be located where they create vehicular stacking or sight distance issues for motorists and pedestrians, and cannot exceed 35 feet in actual height, 30 feet zoned height. 2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRINCIPAL SINGLE- SINGLE-FAMILY RECREATIONAL STRUCTURES FAMILY ATTACHED& AREA DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY ZERO LOT LINES' MINIMUM LOT AREA 4,000 S.F. 3,500 S.F. N/A MIN. LOT WIDTH 40 FEET 35 FEET N/A MIN. FRONT YARDI,2 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET MIN.SIDE YARD 5 FEET 0 OR10 FEET 1/2 BH 7.5 FEET from 7.5 FEET from 10 FEET from MIN. REAR YARD Perimeter Buffer Perimeter Buffer or Perimeter Buffer or LME LME or LME MIN. DISTANCE 10 FEET 10 FEET 1/2 sum of the BH BETWEEN STRUCTURES MAX. ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET BUILDINGHEIGHT SINGLE- SINGLE-FAMILY ACCESSORY FAMILY ATTACHED& RECREATIONAL STRUCTURES DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY AREA ZERO LOT LINES MIN. FRONT YARD SPS SPS SPS MIN.SIDE YARD SPS SPS SPS 0 FEET from 0 FEET from 0 FEET from MIN. REAR YARD Perimeter Perimeter Buffer or Perimeter Buffer Buffer or LME LME or LME MAX.ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT Page 3 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 EXHIBIT B Development Standards Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structure BH = Building Height (zoned height) LME = Lake Maintenance Easement LBE = Landscape Buffer Easement 1. For private roadways, front yard setbacks shall be measured from back of sidewalk. Frontloading garages shall be set back a minimum of 23 feet from edge of sidewalk. 2. For corner lots on private roadways, only 1 front yard setback shall be required and shall be considered the yard containing the driveway. The yard that does not contain the driveway shall provide a 10' setback. 3. If side yard setback is 0 feet on one side, the other side shall be 10 feet for a total building separation of 10 feet. Page 4 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 AZONING:EO ZONING:MH k O3 LAND USE:VACANT LAND USE:VACANT ti 7,1 Z "'.•i Cn F •♦ I nA 1 - I { mm f• -------- F 11 iW 0 � U_mz / 2 -1 r----, l _- A _,j O � __ ___ 1 r, ,ni ri,,,,7, O rl P Z z Z m I 1 1 v-/ O \I _r �.-i I it Q I. Z 1; � D !f Z I ;ZD !t .,,oz y� I ; t I I XI �I N m i I �1�/ ,I,° �O \r m z g I m 1 o= o cmG " m mN I'll 1 r Ei 1 3Z / i pm ii 0 f ,, i +i 4 1 Oz= i i Fi I I JI Ili ii 3 i 10 1 `� f O t ( ` I Q 7C 2 'O Z K*Vi O 1 i ,n �v z,N„z--Im� n�^Ao 1,1 4 i I .i„Oyy�D�� m,7f y�Gl'1 C� 4� Sa~>Z '.. I I I gA2 30, m .:)qG / 1 I m_, 1 O Z FD I ) I m Zm 7aq J , Tk i rn ___ INN o, J pc1 o ir 1( r I I ; K14 it I 4, AT I 1 ♦ '.. A V . I ; M t I mm �.i o 1 I /� 73 T 1♦n1 I 1 A n 7 H 1 � A z ® A ) ;I 1 1I 4 1 \ a \ ----- ?-------- f-- 0 m1 F m1 xi - ROOST ROAD O (//r '_ Ij _x�: "` HIGHNEW HOMES £ 4 HIGHYIEW ROOSTROAD ENGINEERING v 8 w lw .' `"` MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT w� �59 .TW.[6weulaM Page 5 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 f I t I ,0›00 O-AAO =Imago rn Ao to 3 .00m zxnnzzk`m Zmm m O�omm R 33i $' m O 'IHEU r, z L 0 D -moiO O 3 v �j Z m m OQC C mm xpT, o z z a iz ri tR iZ z m� Ob�rm�i !: ! r�`i A�za R1 'f Z' D mm Cpl rD- �mrn mN D DNp$ vl to D'I�m O 3 f0mr7 n z, A 3A om 3 ,rm zm m-mi u.m �T j Z 3 m fTlO o mA Z z mm T, rn- O D U7 zA rnia -�v Zm �A OAm�N 'p� -'A H � DD DOOi l 3mnA-yC Oy>gM 0 0Mc w Q, m 5AA" m m3,6m f3� v zl O 1 1-Am� A go�0--ice 0 mmm 1-11-m Z Cp N gm y �rnz <n mmc?c3 X2p2��m1I <m(�mp3 2Am3 z .D y mpro mm 3 S AO r�77,A DN 7i 0 mg fl +%0 mC 1 KoD6 o-m,03 °QomMo -1PZS A F 2 OF D� f zmp rm ~Yp-0 3 '1 W 0ppT3m m pmp m F ,Dz Zz 3-1A 2(7 �mc.O ZAm C) ,Oct� o m to b-�fn oz (3 DO OO imm �DG)mo vA$o zn m OM A -=';.' Dmzo _Nc Q�Oy -xi cZri TMq8 0 ,- x10,70,AQt/IN A-xi�m T zx 8 N DO Om 1. ymQ2Q'� rn W Ong mm-4 >L) fA EG7 0p mOGfmO - -8 -ta p rnz { u Mx C 0- c zA�x,41 m OAso o{ min pDm-, Omzc z -1D gE 41-OOAn =��5° rypzZ�m D n zm v Ap 0 1A T�tmn mi-: (..) ��-�� m ppA SAn C -nN 0 OmmIQi -yip Nr �T3 rm m3<b<< 0 5 �� m� "yZO D�N-NI m G!�!7 .-Zi�S N-i Z m M m2 Orn mOmm D-iN p{3 p 0� p O M O, O 2 W O o_ n ° a ero .,T cl y n m a y e cry ? OlfPf Blvd ,�+, ff.'L ,. c ._A D m 7,4 m , � N A i F •I Z gD 2 m { 4'.'.p 0 (a °a m 9 r" a Y 2 2 QA V -.. o h . n m M H• hF * M M 7J $ p.. © n ,,, W W W o o m 7J R a. .» O? . io v, i-, nn j >f V ti 3 W N m d1 to m p x,45 HOtl'+Rd , m ga ;� -0. _,o L'S Ve E S * T ' k c flO , a z i a n i f —L III Ci* ,..,g; i ir, t °! ` HIGHVIEW HOMES Y ,. HIGHVIEW R00ST ROAD _ EtlammlNG N 6 j G �"' MASTER PLAN EXHI8IT w.. Page 6 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 EXHIBIT D Legal Description Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN PORTION OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE RUN S01°59'04"W, FOR 1373.61 FEET ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SECTIONS 11 AND 10 TO A RAILROAD SPIKE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4) OF SECTION 11, T51S, R26E; THENCE CONTINUE S88°50'23"E FOR 1362.55 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF MANATEE ROAD (100' RIGHT OF WAY) LINE, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11, T51S, R26E TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4) OF SECTION II, T51S, R26E; THENCE RUN SOI°42'51"W FOR 1388.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4) OF SAID SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE CONTINUE SOI°44'05"W FOR 52.80 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF ROOST ROAD(I00.00'RIGHT OF WAY)TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LANDS; THENCE N89°23'54"W, A DISTANCE OF 155.15 FEET; THENCE N85°46'47"W, A DISTANCE OF 66.11 FEET; THENCE S87°4I'IO"W, A DISTANCE OF 32.02 FEET; THENCE S82°25'56"W, A DISTANCE OF 46.84 FEET; THENCE 516°22'36"W, A DISTANCE OF 9.78 FEET; THENCE S30°07'50"E, A DISTANCE OF 24.34 FEET; THENCE S00°49'IO"W, A DISTANCE OF 225.79 FEET; THENCE 522°29'25"W, A DISTANCE OF 33.80 FEET; THENCE S63°20'43"W, A DISTANCE OF 30.19 FEET; THENCE N87°55'57"W, A DISTANCE OF 400.69 FEET; THENCE N84°29'20"W, A DISTANCE OF 236.07 FEET; THENCE S11°41'46"W, A DISTANCE OF 13.34 FEET; THENCE N78°39'13"W, A DISTANCE OF 38.61 FEET; THENCE N48°07'05"W, A DISTANCE OF 20.56 FEET; THENCE N77°17'48"W, A DISTANCE OF 120.52 FEET; THENCE N05°45'37"W, A DISTANCE OF 77.69 FEET; THENCE N84°36'35"W, A DISTANCE OF 132.98 FEET; THENCE S69°25'01"W, A DISTANCE OF 12.44 FEET; THENCE N87°42'49"W, A DISTANCE OF 81.01 FEET; THENCE S01°59'59"W, A DISTANCE OF 721.32 FEET ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SECTIONS 10 AND II; THENCE CONTINUE S88°13'44"E A DISTANCE OF 1373.23 FEET; Page 7 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 EXHIBIT D Legal Description Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development THENCE CONTINUE N01°44'05"E A DISTANCE OF 905.13 FEET TO THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 8 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 EXHIBIT E List of Deviations Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, "Street System Requirements," which requires minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet, to allow for a 50-foot right-of-way minimum width for the private streets internal to the proposed development. See the attached Private Road Section. Deviation#2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, "On-premises directional signs," which requires on-premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10 feet from edge of roadway, to allow a setback of 5 feet from the edge of private roadway/drive aisle internal to the proposed development. Deviation#3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.01.A, "Off-Street Parking and Loading,"which requires every building and use to provide off-street parking,to allow limited on-street parking for the small scale recreation area as depicted on the attached On-Street Parking Deviation Exhibit. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, "Fences and Walls" which permits a maximum wall height of 6 feet in residential components of a PUD, to allow a maximum wall height of 8 feet along the perimeter of the PUD, and allow a 10-foot wall/berm combination along the perimeter of the PUD. The berm portion of the 10-foot wall/berm shall be a minimum of 2 feet in height. Page 9 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 EXHIBIT E List of Deviations Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development G 1.1 8 r m D a c 7. I r m • 1 ''''''\P "J p tLv Ci xr T V z in .J i _ ' rzA: a Iv R I _ o L 1 NOTE: 61 DESIGN CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. t K m DATPR,201eCLIENT: HIGHVIEW HOMES ' SCALE'. 1' =10 DRAWN Br. TITLE: HIGHVIEW ROOST ROAD lNON IIIMINO MDA GUT Willow Park Drive,Suite 2001 Naples,Florida 34109 nE,n.G BY: TYPICAL ROAD SECTION (239)597-0575 FAX(239)597-0579 BCB vuwwconsult-rwa.mn sec. TN., a,e PROJECT SHEE1 FILE Florida Certificates of Authori2atien EB 7663 LB 6952 11 51 26 NUMBER 15 07.00.01 NUMBER: OF 1 NUMBER. \ A01£]OLLliAAI I t !M M20511b MIMAI!WhmMrs M - MmWNfYi Sim lMflR'Al RPADSC LINMIIAY• ...• + Page 10 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 EXHIBIT E List of Deviations Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development 7'CONCRETE SIDEWALK CANOPY TREE W/THICKENED EDGE CANOPY TREE }•rya. •,?tti 3 aoc W W ('J EDGE OF PAVEMENT 2'VALLEY GUTTER 5'CONCRETE SIDEWALK NOTE: DESIGN CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. ",ATE 'CLIENT APR.,2016 HIGHVIEW HOMES SCALE' 1"=20' RA Ha"' TITLE HIGHVIEW AREA MDA 6610 Willow Park Drive,Suite 2001 Naples,Florida 34109 DESF*oer. ON STREET PARKING DEVIATION EXHIBIT CZ%597-0575 FAX F739)597-0576 AJC ,.vv.c sult-rwe.cn sEt: Pnro. RUr PROJECT SHEET FILE Florida Ceracetesc0AlthorizuIln E37663 LB 6952 11 51 26 NUMBER 150007.00.02 NUMBER: 1 OF 1 NUMBER.STREET PARKING ow J .Me]lrill MAW A:NOW9iOmm IYtAYSI W-M�mMW9illmislABTIMlYi�4+l Page 11 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 EXHIBIT F Development Commitments Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development PUD MONITORING: A. One entity(hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Highview Homes,LLC or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts,the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. ENVIRONMENTAL A. Retention of native trees in accordance with the requirements of the LDC is required for this PUD. A total of 100 cabbage palms, 30 slash pines and a DBH equivalent of 39 hardwood trees have been identified on site at the time of PUD rezone. If existing trees cannot be retained, at least half of the of the trees planted to satisfy this requirement shall be planted in the open space area around the water management lakes and consist of oak trees planted above the lake maintenance easement and cypress planted below the lake maintenance easement. PUBLIC UTILITIES A. The wastewater system will be connected to: a. An existing private force main located along Roost Road,with permission from the owner(s) of the force main, or b. An appropriately sized force main installed along Roost Road constructed at the owner's expense, to be conveyed to the County per Ordinance. B. If master metered, water connection will be made to the 8" water main along Roost Road, otherwise, an additional stub-out with 15' construction and maintenance easements will be provided along the western property line of the project. Page 12 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 EXHIBIT F Development Commitments Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development TRANSPORTATION A. The maximum trip generation allowed for the development may not exceed 66 PM Peak Hour two way trips. MISCELLANEOUS A. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of a permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. B. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. C. The owner shall reconfigure the lake slopes of the off-site lake abutting the PUD's northern boundary to a maximum four to one slope as shown on the Proposed Condition Development Lake Setback Exhibit,and consistent with Section 22-112 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. The lake depth shall be 5 ± feet. The proposed lake improvements will be limited to the portion of said lake as depicted on the Master Plan and Proposed Condition Development Lake Setback Exhibit. Littoral plantings and a lake maintenance easement shall not be required. Page 13 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 EXHIBIT F Development Commitments Highview Roost Road Residential Planned Unit Development EXISTING OFF-SITE LAKE WATER EDGE AT CONTROL ELEVATION PROPERTY LINE TREES 25' I% .-... lir _ O.0 RaglN rn ,.,,ig Ir , ___ _ ___ — / — gym - .___ t ` LANDSCAPE BUFFER LOT EASEMENT AND LINE REAR LOT LINE /—....., s /-PROPERTY LINE t VARIES MIN FF ELEV 41 GREATER OF FEMA+1.0' MAk o1 7 MIN OR 1 4:2EXISTING 100 YEAR(CALCULATED) OFF-SITE 20'DEVELOPMENT LAKE V CONTROL LAKE SETBACK ELEVATION 1.79' qI (NAVD) 15'LANDSCAPEC 75 MIN UFFER EASEMENT 5.0 t 5'MIN Ilillin 2'MIN DISCLAIMER THIS EXHIBIT 15 FOR ILLUSTRATION URPOSES AND NOT TO SCALE. ' ` ATE: MAY 2016 . C"E"T. HIGHVIEW HOMES, LLC A01"6 4A E: NTS �w�er TITLE: PROPOSED CONDITION MOINNlING OL 6610 Willow Park Drive,Suite 2001 Naples,Fonda 34109 ESGNEDEl, DEVELOPMENT LAKE SETBACK EXHIBIT (239)597-0575 FAX(239)597-0578 M1S www.consult-rwa.com SEC rvmace PROJECT SHEET FILE fl orida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 LB 6952 11 515: 26E NUMB ER 150007.00.0iNUMBER: 01 OF 01 NUMBER 1500670001 44 \, Playa mMAW••••• •6om M/ 'rrAaa-PLEM QnrelWIMMILLMnrIIIM2a0Cnlms415-iesrw rreixHiW1402 Page 14 of 14 5/26/2016 revision Highview Roost Road RPUD RWA File 150007.00.01 PUDZ-PL20140002809 PUDZ-PL20150001613 6/2/16 Grace Romanian Baptist Church Teresa L. Cannon From: BeasleyRachel <RachelBeasley@colliergov.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 12:10 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: JohnsonEric;Ann P.Jennejohn; Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael; Kendall, Marcia; Lang,Ashley; Neet, Virginia; Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: RMC Enclave Grace Romanian Advertisement Request Attachments: RMC Enclave Grace Romanian (2x3) Map.pdf; RMC Enclave Grace Romanian Request for Advertisement.docx; Signature Page.pdf Good afternoon, Please advertise the RMC Enclave RPUD, Grace Romanian RPUD petition attachments for the June 2, 2016, CCPC hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department—Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 Co er Comity Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 May 03, 2016 Collier County Planning Commission Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on May 13, 2016,and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Eric Johnson, Principal Planner in the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the followinq on ALL Invoices: DIVISION:ZONING [Zoning Services Section] FUND&COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number: 068778 ,7?, �-- Authorized Designee signature for CCPC Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 AM., on Thursday,June 2nd, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2014-34, the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004- 41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 12.17± acres of land zoned Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) zoning district known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD; by adding 48 residential dwelling units for a total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding 200 group housing units for a total of 500 group housing units; by amending the master plan; by repealing Ordinance No. 11-18, the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD; and by providing an effective date. The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Learning Lane and Livingston Road, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 40.55± acres. [P U DZ-PL20150001613] (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to Thursday, June 2nd, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman s ivE2 SANDAL sp IV 4 0I 4 m 1 0 • a LIVINGSTON ROAD i g � m W g � m N-, 0 VI % m s 4 m Sq Eifi8 rig INTERSTATE-75 n O J —I L CYPRESS WOODS O m GOLF k COUNTRY Z L CLUB Lip smp. r' Teresa L. Cannon From: Minutes and Records To: BeasleyRachel Subject: RE: RMC Enclave Grace Romanian Advertisement Request I will forward the proof as soon as I receive it. From: BeasleyRachel [mailto:RachelBeasley@colliergov.net] Sent:Tuesday, May 03, 2016 12:10 PM To: Minutes and Records<MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com> Cc:JohnsonEric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net>; Ann P.Jennejohn<Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com>; Bellows, Ray <RayBellows@colliergov.net>; Bosi, Michael<MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; Kendall, Marcia <MarciaKendall@colliergov.net>; Lang, Ashley<ashleylang@colliergov.net>; Neet,Virginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; Rodriguez, Wanda <WandaRodriguez@colliergov.net> Subject: RMC Enclave Grace Romanian Advertisement Request Good afternoon, Please advertise the RMC Enclave RPUD, Grace Romanian RPUD petition attachments for the June 2, 2016, CCPC hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department—Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 C : er Covire<ty Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Acct. #068778 May 4, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples News Media Group 1100 Immokalee Rd. Naples, Florida 34110 Re: PUDZ-PL20150001613 — Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD (Display AD w/Map) Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced Notice W/Map on Friday, May 13, 2016, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teresa Cannon, Deputy Clerk P.O. # 4500161942 May 04, 2016 Collier County Planning Commission Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on May 13, 2016, and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Minutes & Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#401, Naples, Florida 34112. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section] FUND & COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number: 068778 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, June 2nd, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2014-34, the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004- 41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 12.17± acres of land zoned Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD; by adding 48 residential dwelling units for a total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding 200 group housing units for a total of 500 group housing units; by amending the master plan; by repealing Ordinance No. 11-18, the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD; and by providing an effective date. The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Learning Lane and Livingston Road, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 40.55± acres. [P U DZ-P L2 0150001613] (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite #401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to Thursday, June 2nd, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman ; Nix MOOD Nix SANDAL ; EpND\ 2-0D LIVINGSTON ROAD c u Qq z S� _O N � m O D ` A o0T,r� y _gym 0 D m2 4 P O I zi S D S M1(l INTERSTATE-75 n Q J L CYPRESS WOODS Q m GOLF k COUNTRY Z Li CLUB AP xx Teresa L. Cannon From: Teresa L. Cannon Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:33 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals; Gori,Ivonne (ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com) Subject: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Attachments: PUDZ-PL20150001613 (CCPC 6-2-16).doc; PUDZ-PL20150001613 (CCPC 6-2-16).doc; PUDZ-PL20150001613 (CCPC 6-2-16).pdf Legals, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday, May 13, 2016.Thanks Teresa Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes & Records bepartment 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 12:42 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Confirmed receipt. Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist ):Ittple5Dail.11 Nettie I • raoAYiKr Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:33 AM To: Legals NDN <legals@naplesnews.com>; Gori, Ivonne<ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Legals, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday, May 13, 2016.Thanks Teresa Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes & Records Department 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient,you must not copy,distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. Unless expressly stated,opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailing helpdesk©collierclerk.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents.The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 12:19 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Attachments: N D N B1076944.pdf Please see attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist ' tpfr5 ailli 1etu I •:i Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 8:26 AM To:Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: FW: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Just making sure you received this one as well. It was one of three I sent Wednesday. From:Teresa L. Cannon Sent:Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:33 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals<Iegals@naplesnews.com>; Gori, Ivonne (ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com) <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Legals, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday, May 13, 2016.Thanks Teresa Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes & Records Department 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 2nd,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida amending Ordinance No.2014- 34,the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development,and amending Ordinance No.2004-41,the Collier County Land Development Code,by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 12.17±acres of land zoned Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD;by adding 48 residential dwelling units for a total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding 200 group housing units for a total of 500 group housing units;by amending the master plan;by repealing Ordinance No.11-18,the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD;and by providing an effective date.The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Learning Lane and Livingston Road,in Section 13,Township 48 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida consisting of 40.55±acres.[PUDZ-PL20150001613] ce TUSCANY QUAIL RESERVE WEST (DRI) MEDITERRA Cl) 12 PEZZE11NO 7 8 DI CIELO J MEDITERRA VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. 0o H PROJECT RMC � ; ENCLAVE DELLARLOCATION GRACE BRANDON ROMANIA QUAIL BAPTIST CREEK CHURCH n y ROYAL PALM 13 PELICAN o ACADEMY STRAND w O z 17 ✓ (DRI) 18 3 8. 0. MARSILEA F VILLAS MADEIRA Z All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor,Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail,Suite#401,Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,June 2nd,2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman No.1076944 May 13.2016 Teresa L. Cannon To: Neet,Virginia;JohnsonEric (EricJohnson@colliergov.net); BeasleyRachel (RachelBeasley@colliergov.net) Subject: FW: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Attachments: N D N B 1076944.pdf Please review From:Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 12:19 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Please see attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist Nap N>L'Itt: IIP"NETWORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 8:26 AM To:Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: FW: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Just making sure you received this one as well. It was one of three I sent Wednesday. From:Teresa L. Cannon Sent:Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:33 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals<legals@naplesnews.com>; Gori, Ivonne (ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com) <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Legals, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday, May 13,2016.Thanks Teresa Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes & Records Department 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 1:08 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon; Neet, Virginia; BeasleyRachel Subject: RE: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Looks good to me. Thanks! Eric Johnson Principal Planner From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 12:21 PM To: NeetVirginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>;JohnsonEric<Ericlohnson@colliergov.net>; BeasleyRachel <RachelBeasley@colliergov.net> Subject: FW: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Please review From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 12:19 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Please see attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist �iI}71Q. D UE!� t1L1 t I •1 ORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 8:26 AM To: Gori, Ivonne<ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: FW: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Just making sure you received this one as well. It was one of three I sent Wednesday. From:Teresa L. Cannon Sent:Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:33 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals<legals@naplesnews.com>; Gori, Ivonne(ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com) 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Neet,Virginia Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:02 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: FW: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Attachments: N DN B1076944.pdf From: AshtonHeidi Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 3:47 PM To: NeetVirginia Cc: CrotteauKathynell Subject: FW: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Approved. Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 From: CrotteauKathynell Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 2:35 PM To: AshtonHeidi Subject: FW: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Heidi: The attached is correct per the 12.16.15 title in TO. .xathy Crotteau LegalSecretary Office of the Collier County.Attorney Phone.. (239)252-8400 hathynellcrotteaugcollergov.net From: NeetVirginia Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 1:15 PM To: AshtonHeidi; CrotteauKathynell Subject: FW: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church See attached for your approval. Dinny 1 Teresa L. Cannon To: Gori,Ivonne Subject: RE: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Looks good, ok to run.Thanks From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 12:19 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Please see attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist P1i t Dili ill 1k'1ll=t I 1110IirwoRRKY Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori @naple snews.corn NaplesNews.com From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 8:26 AM To:Gori, Ivonne<ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: FW: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Just making sure you received this one as well. It was one of three I sent Wednesday. From:Teresa L. Cannon Sent:Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:33 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals<legals@naplesnews.com>; Gori, Ivonne (ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com) <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Legals, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday, May 13, 2016.Thanks Teresa Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes & Records bepartment 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com i Teresa L. Cannon From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 10:45 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: JohnsonEric; BeasleyRachel;Ashton, Heidi Subject: FW: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Attachments: NDNB1076944.pdf A correction has been made to the title of the attached item. Please ask the NDN to make the following revision to the 7th line of the title: "...for a total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding 290 150 group housing units for a total of fl Thank you, Wanda Rodriguez, ACT Advanced Certified Para(egaf Office of the County Attorney (239)252-8400 From: AshtonHeidi Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 9:43 AM To: RodriguezWanda Subject: FW: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church {/e/e/isAtoK-('ielo Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 From: AshtonHeidi Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 3:47 PM To: NeetVirginia Cc: CrotteauKathynell Subject: FW: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Approved. Heidi Ashton-Cicko 1 Teresa L. Cannon To: Gori, Ivonne Subject: RE: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 - Grace Romanian Baptist Church Attachments: PUDZ-PL20150001613 (CCPC 6-2-16).doc Hi Ivonne, The County Attorney's office has a small correction to this proof that was ok'd last week. I have attached the revision. It is small and highlighted.Thank you From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 12:19 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: Proof 1076944 RE: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Please see attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist N:I}1il':iDittii; 1):rithiI USAODAY NETWORK ( Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com From:Teresa L. Cannon [mai!to:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 8:26 AM To:Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: FW: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Just making sure you received this one as well. It was one of three I sent Wednesday. From:Teresa L. Cannon Sent:Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:33 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals<legals@naplesnews.com>; Gori, Ivonne (ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com) <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: PUDZ-PL20150001613 -Grace Romanian Baptist Church Legals, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday, May 13, 2016.Thanks Teresa Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes & Records Department 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Gori,Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:03 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: REVISED 1076944 Attachments: N DN 61076944.pdf Please see corrected proof attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist Nap10'DalIli NeilT5 I !'mow Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 2nd,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida amending Ordinance No.2014- 34,the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development,and amending Ordinance No.2004-41,the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 12.17±acres of land zoned Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD)known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD;by adding 48 residential dwelling units for a total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding150 group housing units for a total of 500 group housing units;by amending the master plan;by repealing Ordinance No.11-18,the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD;and by providing an effective date.The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Learning Lane and Livingston Road,in Section 13,Township 48 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida consisting of 40.55±acres.[PUDZ-PL20150001613] O TUSCANY QUAIL O RESERVE WEST (DRI) MEDITERRA U) 12 pEZZETINO 7 8 • DI CIELO J MEDITERRA VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. oa RMC PROJECT N ENCLAVE DELLA I ON ! BR:oNL0iT a J VILLAS MADEIRA Z r o 0 0 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor,Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail,Suite#401,Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,June 2nd,2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman No.1076944 May 13,2016 Teresa L. Cannon To: RodriguezWanda (WandaRodriguez@colliergov.net) Subject: FW: REVISED 1076944 Attachments: N D N B1076944.pdf Please review, revised Grace Romanian Baptist Church From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:03 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED 1076944 Please see corrected proof attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist .1F1L`_11.1i11j 111113, I `pitiwoRK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 1:38 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Cc: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: REVISED 1076944 Attachments: N D N B1076944.pdf Well it looks like it needs a space right before the new number 150, but otherwise is fine. Wanda Rodriguez, ACT .Advanced Certified ParaCega1 Office of the County.Attorney (239)252-8400 From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:10 PM To: RodriguezWanda Subject: FW: REVISED 1076944 Please review, revised Grace Romanian Baptist Church From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:03 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED 1076944 Please see corrected proof attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist iI}711.i 1�II[11 News I ON,T.KusATom Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Teresa L. Cannon To: Gori,Ivonne Subject: RE: REVISED 1076944 Hi Ivonne, It looks like there needs to be a space before the 150(correction). From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:03 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED 1076944 Please see corrected proof attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 3:06 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: 2nd REVISED 1076944 Attachments: N DN B1076944.pdf This proof has the space in between. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist NizplisBuilt!News I •VIN Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 2nd,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida amending Ordinance No.2014- 34,the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development,and amending Ordinance No.2004-41,the Collier County Land Development Code,by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 12.17±acres of land zoned Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD;by adding 48 residential dwelling units for a total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding 150 group housing units for a total of 500 group housing units;by amending the master plan;by repealing Ordinance No.11-18,the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD;and by providing an effective date.The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Learning Lane and Livingston Road,in Section 13,Township 48 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida consisting of 40.55±acres.[PUDZ-PL20150001613] • 0 TUSCANY QUAIL RESERVE WEST (DRI) MEDITERRA u 12 PEZZETINO 7 8 DI CIELO J MEDITERRA VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. os RMC H PROJECT N3 ENCLAVE DELLA LOCATION GRACE BRANDON ROMANIA QUAIL BAPTIST CREEK CHURCHROYAL PALM 13 PELICAN g ACADEMY STRAND uJ o z 17 ✓ (DRI) 18 3 8 K wv'Sv MARSILEA F J VILLAS MADEIRA z 8 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor,Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail,Suite#401,Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,June 2nd,2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman No.1076944 May 13.2016 Teresa L. Cannon To: RodriguezWanda (WandaRodriguez@colliergov.net) Subject: FW: 2nd REVISED 1076944 Attachments: N DN B1076944.pdf Revised with space From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 3:06 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: 2nd REVISED 1076944 This proof has the space in between. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist } I C:1 7411141 N.1,1thi I NusAETWORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.goriga,naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Rodriguez,Wanda Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 3:11 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: 2nd REVISED 1076944 Looks good now, thanks! Wanda Rodriguez, 91.CP .Advanced Certified ParaCegaC Office of the County.Attorney (239)2.52-8400 From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 3:10 PM To: RodriguezWanda Subject: FW: 2nd REVISED 1076944 Revised with space From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 3:06 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: 2nd REVISED 1076944 This proof has the space in between. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist 1aPirti iai[i;learn; I • -fir Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Teresa L. Cannon To: Gori, Ivonne Subject: RE: 2nd REVISED 1076944 Thank you, Looks good, ok to run! From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 3:06 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: 2nd REVISED 1076944 This proof has the space in between. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist .1.t}tlr�,+l blit`Sitio I ! womAi Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE Notice is hereby given that on Wednesday,May 25,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,3rd Floor,Building"F,"Collier County Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,Florida 34112,the Collier County Planning Commission,sitting as the local planning agency and as the Environmental Advisory Council,will consider amendments to the Collier County Land Development Code.The meeting will commence at 5:05 P.M.The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT;SECTION THREE,ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING:CHAPTER ONE-GENERAL PROVISIONS,INCLUDING SECTION 1.08.02 DEFINITIONS; CHAPTER TWO - ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES, INCLUDING SECTION 2.03.01 AGRICULTURAL DISTRICTS,SECTION 2.03.02 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, SECTION 2.03.03 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS,SECTION 2.03.06 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS,SECTION 2.03.07 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS, SECTION 2.03.08 RURAL FRINGE ZONING DISTRICTS; CHAPTER THREE-RESOURCE PROTECTION, INCLUDING SECTION 3.02.10 STANDARDS FOR SUBDIVISION PLATS, SECTION 3.05.04 VEGETATION REMOVAL AND PROTECTION STANDARDS,SECTION 3,05,07 PRESERVATION 4 STANDARDS,SECTION 3.05.10 LITTORAL SHELF PLANTING AREA(LSPA);CHAPTER FOUR-SITE DESIGN M AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION 4.02.33 SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE s . IMMOKALEE-MOBILE HOME PARK OVERLAY SUBDISTRICT,ADDING SECTION 4.05.10 REQUIRED PARKING v FOR RESIDENTIAL CENTRAL MAIL DELIVERY LOCATIONS, SECTION 4.06.02 BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, 0 SECTION 4.06.05 GENERAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS;CHAPTER FIVE-SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION 5.03.06 DOCK FACILITIES,SECTION 5.04,05 TEMPORARY EVENTS,SECTION 5.04.06 N5 TEMPORARY SIGNS,SECTION 5.05.04 GROUP HOUSING;ADDING SECTION 5.05.14 EDUCATIONAL PLANTS, SECTION 5.06.00 SIGN REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS BY LAND USE CLASSIFICATION;CHAPTER SIX— o INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING >, SECTION 6.02.06 POTABLE WATER FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE REQUIREMENTS,SECTION 6.02.07 SANITARY r0 SEWER FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE REQUIREMENTS,SECTION 6.06.03 STREETLIGHTS;CHAPTER NINE - VARIATIONS FROM CODE REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING SECTION 9,04.04 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS >7, FOR MINOR AFTER-THE-FACT ENCROACHMENT;CHAPTER TEN-APPLICATION,REVIEW,AND DECISION- ro MAKING PROCEDURES, INCLUDING SECTION 10.02.03 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT, SITE Ln 0) IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND AMENDMENTS THEREOF,SECTION 10.02.05 CONSTRUCTION,APPROVAL,AND C ACCEPTANCE OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS, SECTION 10.02.11 SUBMITTAL OF STREETLIGHT PLANS; 'D SECTION FOUR,CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY;SECTION FIVE,INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE;AND SECTION SIX,EFFECTIVE DATE. l/1r....—, '' ". CdeNr Cahn* j „a.,.a W yyy`�`�`p�y�y�y j QS o 'N t ul III _J a . z \ {� a/ ..H•..... •..,.% IMMOKALEE • en dD¢YfIpN) 3. l CR N (,,f r 1tl. 1Tom' l L i i wc,u,a* T{ :,a _ 1 Imniokalee Urban Overlay District Immokalee Main Street Overlay Subdistrict All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed amendments are available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section,Growth Management Department,2800 N.Horseshoe Drive,Naples,Florida,between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday through Friday. Furthermore,materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor,Suite#401,Collier County Government Center,East Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman NA,...1.0.84,5M4.._.._ ._,_.,. _ �. __ _. ___ �_ MaY..16>2_Q 6 tt rE BMW NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV 1076944 PUBLIC HEARING Pub Dates May 13,2016 c (Sign ure of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me 1 .0.10 �•., IVONNE GOBI 0 �'� �` Notary Public-State of Florida • 0 11 This May 24, 16 + �'1 •g Commission #r FF 900e70 c'=� My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 A r� 0 I1;;�• �• Banded through National Notary Astra. (Signatur of affiant) ' C CS 14A I Friday,May13,201671 NAPLES DAILY NEWS E 0. O PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE O NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CD NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE(S) 0Notice is hereby given that a public heanng will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission Notice is hereby await Pet a public hearing wit oe held by the Collier County Planning Commission et 9'.00 at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 2nd,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting a)T A.M.,on Thursday,Jure End,2010,m the Board,County commasioners Mooting Room,torn Floor,CA. Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 Fast Tanliarni Trail,Naples FL,to consider: Government Cent.,3299 Fast Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.to consider CAn Ordnance of the Board of CountyCommissioners of Collier County,Florida amending Ordinance No.2016- An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida amending •- 34.the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development.and amending Ordinance No.200441.the Collier Ordinance N0.2004-41,e6 amended,the Colder County Land Development Code.Which County tend Development Code,by emending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by ohengmg the established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier non,gaasillcen.of an additional 12.17x acre.of land zoned Community Facility Planned Untt Development Canty Florida by amending the appropnae zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning CO classification of the herein described real properly from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district (CFPUD)known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Resident.Planned Unit to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPM)zoning district far a protect known as the D. DevelopmentplPUD)mnina alt known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD;by adding de resieenbeltlwalmg oohs Onyx RPUD to allow development of up to 48 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units Z fora total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding 150 group housing units for atotal of Soo group Musing on property located en the east side ofSanta Barbara Boulevard approximately one hon mile Naps,by amending the master pen:by reeve dat The suue No.11-18,the Greco Romanian Baptist Church of north of Rattlesnake-Hammack Road in Section 16,Township 50 South,Range 26 Fast,Copier Naples crPuO.and by proviairg eneffective.ata.the subjaut property Wbtatatl atI.northwest quadrant or . County,Florida,consisting of 8.720 acres;providing for repeal of Ordinance No.06-53 and by N Q Le.ning Lane and Livingston Road,In S.ticn,5.Township d3 South,Range 25 East,Collier County.Florida providing an effective date.[PUOZ-P120140000900) consisting o1 a055z acres.IPUDZ-PL2:•50001613 C LU wC I DAVIS BLVD. 5.R )merman J TM xuse01mevHERITAGE ,, GOLF ANO COUNTRY CLUB V I rACRMNA Q tuscANr 1 RESERVE WAIL su 6 IllreO — RESERVE CNBY NAPLES GOLF0.U9k O. l .p A E NE m Meem ° \I DRI, WEST ro WA qg O Q 7 A'- 12 p aE,o 7 e a L__—L_ � y 1'rL 3� 9 t0 UzaO. xEgEwRA mrr ,, NODES CF ISV.NDIA vETARANS M i I , .. og, MEMORIAL PROJECT sx400w- LAW CCNSERVAnoNAREA to <Y CNC,. LOCATION mNmA 1"f0"ev* I NWA ROP" PROJECT 79. CU 'GRACE eAP sT � xarCx I Y LOCATION WURCx cgam, 1VS 17 O Yw a 13 �, S1RCAN ^ or i 17 J = A woods �� ,s :LAKES I� � OR) ,6a =J aUWSo NM Di24 a I/ hoc D W` Gouxwr a.ue g VILLAS YAODRA RATTER NAPE =Or PO. /'I� L• TO CIl O In -- Q AI interested parties am invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE f (..) m museeponies are united to appear and be heart..Copof the proposed ORDINANCE will he made win be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor,Collier available for inspection at the C0Oder County Clerk's Office,Fouts Roo,,Collier County Government Center, County Goverment Center,3299 East Tarrlanl Trail,Suite 3401,Naples,FL,one week prior a) O L ed V9 East Taman Trail,Suite Cam,Naples,FL one week pew to the scheduled hearing.written comments to the scheduled hearing.Wratten comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning • E a) to must be filed with the Zoning D'IvisIon.Zoning Services Section,prior to Thur..June and,2018. Services Seam,prior to Thursday,June 2nd,2016. if < U) 0 n ta respect t to an to appeal any decision made by the en hr County Planning Commission �l t a any ma erodes en d at s any decision made by he Collier County rlanning proceeding ,ru respect What rroc ed n any for ch purposed at may meetingdrr urerthat he will need a record of o arty menti considered et such meeting or hearing,M wit read a record of that promeding,end for such that proceeding,and far such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the purpose he may need to ensure that a ve,catim record of the proceedings is made,ellich record mciudee the proceedings Is made,which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal teen mony antl evidence upon which me appeal a to be based. is to be based. If you arra person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate you are enuued,at no coat to you,to the mansion of ceRain anista..Please contact the Collier County in the proceeding,you we entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Facilities Management Division,bested at 3335 Tamlaml Trevi East,Sone 0101.Naples.FL 34112-5368,(239) Please contact the Col er County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tamiami 262a3so,at least her days poor to the meeting Assisted listening devices for the Mating Impaired are Tran East,Suite#101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)2525380,at least two days prior to the C e.t.a in the Boar of County Commissioners Office, meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hexing impaired are available in the Board of County '— Commissioners Office. U) Collier County Planning Commeseon N Mork strain.Chairman Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairmen x &mow Mavfs Aga No 1077182 May 13 20th 0) a a YOUR CHOICE ' L A a B O Y - zc) z LUCKY LEATHER LQCKY13 SALE WHILE SUPPLIES LASTI ` 3SINE „.• QQQ E oc T :110 only�V88each O H 3 DAYS ONLY! MAY 131"-15TH COLEMAN ROCKER RECLINER L ZN Turn Friday the 13th into the luckiest time of the year! Ong origll�ly Q C - o $3895499 ASTOR LEATHER % OFF RECLINER EXTRA LUCKY originally =1399 1 ° HOT BUY RECLINER. STOREWIDE• WHILE SUPPLIES '511 $312 . t. LEATHER 13 O ... .- .. • RECLINER Plus originally 11 ... /1599 EUzi .vvit OFF GAVINLEATTHER RECLINEREC6711 q 12 MONTH SPECIAL FINANCING' on y$5878 9thally W -on purchases of 5500 or more with your La-2-Boy Furniture Galleries Card made between Free in-home design>• Expedited delivery oil 4 tit r May 13-15,2016 12 equal monthly payments required.See below fdi details. sci,d.a,oi,,,eedeaacoonsoeaeorrraa,t 1I 1 on in-stock items tZ N L A 4r7 B O Y 4tz:••0 LL Oil 1 ..., ; fu r HOME FURNISHINGS & DECOR t T\ "Valid on 6-Z-Bo items only.Offers may not be combined,and Savings exclude _— NAPLES•3770 TAMIAMI TRAIL N•239-213-4276 advertised nems,hot buys,unadvertised clearance specials,special offers custom orders f��+'(•j protectlon,odoro chases,delNery,antl sales ax Savngs ma not be based on actual FORT MYERS•4515 S CLEVELAND AVE•239-275-9566 sales.Urcirsfawn Is representative of stock a selection,stye and color may vpi by store.Quantities may be limited.Every,precaution is taken to produce accurate details, WWW.Ia-z-boy.eom/westflorida errors in price and/or offers may occur In print.We.reserve the right to correct any such Mon-Fri 9:30am-7pm-Sat 10am-7 m•Sun 12 errors. Financing subject to credit approval;minimum monthly payments required; t P Pm-5pm other financing options are available.See store representative for more details. 13 L LL = 1 = a c >_ c E cc Q z 0 W W I— z W pLL w co z ¢ o \�� gy =p = > JQ � "'� z �,i cooz H 0 � —I _, cc pC Z w w Jmww ¢ ¢ ¢ 0 ¢ �_- :LI ! O O Jz P_ W Qmw C7 w_icc C Z w w .Jw MI ,ZQ J mow cin Tc ~ u) F- °� of a uu • J 1-- u) W w ¢ z _ � � 0 � o cn �`� ,w cc _ - -w-, a s' ? LU v) °rQ w a Q moo D � O w J °CccLU z O Qco -.1 5 — ,U co W i ¢ ~ w ¢ a W0 < w2 Q .0 18Qw W CL � CC CC z occ i gym ¢ � w ¢ a O `ti � z Q w � Q cn cc n- w \ p 0) � ¢ w CI) C° � n zp � zCI o 45 FE a wJ LI-) o � Cr o � _ CO z mw 0 J ¢p Cn U p ~ ¢ ,= o z o w CD F- =, o u- ooc Q � �_ _LL wz = Z D � O � -� � UO F- .� o USF- Cl- H • LL Nzw Z co 0 0` 0 I-- < m ¢ Ow ,Wj (� w F- 2 LU m H- 0 vi o z cc O i-= W 0.o 1 z m ¢0-a M O cw J E m � � m cc 0 � I- P- im' -E sK CC -if) 0 0p w E E oz 00 � p O = w ._ w � mow CC = 0 cv Lu 1— = � = m E o �� O w0 I- u) < i= LU 5 cc WO op Q 9 zwi_ CC � w _W.1 �_ c QQU CO � O= w ¢ mow O p p Q i- CD � Q `c a LU � p ~ 13 a � U I V w = w CM oma = _Z LL Z o ¢ ¢ w W � O = CD F- ¢ U O iii u- Mcg = F- = c� Q O � „,1-1-1 -71= M Z J i1 m J Q CC Cin ca c° z I-Lp Y Z w Z w �Cr)'' 0 m O Li- ICC N0 M w - M (� �J zZ � W oQ } w j p CJ �y� Z (.'3 = = H W U ¢ w W oQ O ` � � cn H W Qzw W oz o O ¢ w 0 - - �I C'3 1- d \ zz = = z � tr- O >- CD O � V O ¢ ~ za UJ -I Z O =z LU O CI W cnz OU pw O Z a 0 >- CD 1- p � M V UOQ H- z W � w � 0 � w O 0 Lu . cc Q z Z ^\ m0 V W .1= -its U J 0 S a E `v . www m wm CWj a � _ UF- CD 1 O m 0 J mLT, J 01 0Q I ° of:ca� a) >- \\ Z CC 13) Q ",._,- to d) �, Z cc CD a) CD D 9 CO a CO `D„ CD N m CD = o CD CD ° O = m Q. -n "< v Q W C = O r D CO CO W D � 0 Dn C7 m = n -0 'O mO m rr ,..F 'G o m D o = C� r = r 0 °° m 0 3 r m ...1- i= '-" CD 5 D W r n0 W m C 3 c z p c=j J m co KO � �. m v' -' m v, WO \ Z cn SI —I mW p � mz CO O m m WmOc .• Z O cn oz -1 m p M � O -1 Z < e M o -1 zz . _ O Z mz mO mO � r mz O DD (A 0 rn 7° m -I z o D OZ 2 mG) D , zmm m czz ►� Z �m m O Z Z A T r 0 m > m o▪ D0 IT1 -1zm 7D O0W = r0 70 0 Ga r4:1 � z0 E -gym m * 0N) - co E * W , D O > = CQ Z -n Z = -< oZ co 2 °W -i 0 __I = 0 C. - Cl. —1 0DD C = 00i Q i = O � m oDDCL -` i = OZ m mDD o = rn = T cn r0W al m = T (n r- 0 W C3 = D T < Cl) a -i Do m D to a. W = O =1m 5 D _ 11 m cn _ « f/1 m —I rrl Z 0 CO = O � =1m 7 — r = � OcnZ ° \V m = m 7, 0cmiwo o -I O � O = Z � „ 0 m o f a 0 mpp O :E C g 3 Q m C m i- Zy = 2 p o O - '-1 O 0 m 00 D — = in -1 � � Opo I. .1 m T � n 7Jz0 J -� O rn Too O � 2o O r C0 O C'oz o -0 � - 0 o0z m ,- z -IWz 5• ... T I TT -1 _1 C 7 v ^ = W m m z N 0 = W z m Z ry ` + Orn � n -I 0 0 . O o T O -I O -I � = -1 0 = mo o- _ n rn OZ Z 0 m z rn z � Z 0mz 0 � m p Z _HO \DO 1 D * m p Z � � - � —I D � o8O cn rr- � D -10o O Wcn 2 mD ' CD Cr) 0 N CD 1 mm m � 0 � r cnz O o7DW V► -v cp m zz p omrn y o o D m22p D r,., � WAD ---1 cn p nzc cn o � D rn U3 02c m o � 0 O0m m o * p oc) m t I- ,-,= 2 Di m rn - m = xi m o m m = Ci) (\ Z < z Cn 0 W D �\ - < Z cn C7 m = a _1 m 'f) (n mo O _J - -1D (n -0pD r mm O Dope 0 = 0 O D Z r mm Z � 0I m pz r KOr C-> D O D m m co \ 33 oo zoW % I- EITI _ -Ii3 � ‘ D3 m z cn 0 -< u, o r z 2 z 2 O D O D 70 XJ Table A Land Use Trips 1 Daily Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Trips Generated Trips Generated Trips Generated Size (ADT) (vph) (vph) > Single-Family 48 d.u.'s 535 43 54 (LUC 210) 7 Senior Housing 150 d.u.'s 516 30 38 (LUC 252) ALF 150 d.u.'s 411 27 44 (LUC 254) CCR Community 150 d.u.'s 375 41 79 (LUC 255) O Church 500 Seats 925 305 N/A (LUC 560) (Sunday) (Sunday) O Daycare Center 150 Students 657 120 108 (LUC 565) 1 M K.i c W.c/c maw oM 1w91A-gyg,wyyy- o ¢CC -a N W ZOOZ QZ tt 2l� e = -J W O / ga. a —....—z—am $— J 2 > O U W O CC W �, C g P 1 W a Q a'p� Wiz / _ a W P. / ¢ W CO w F O ;4 U tn� Z UOza W t44. '� U� 0 Np QX U-U ui -UN<CO ci / ij// / LO f/ -o o oO zQg 2�nQO / �f/, �/ / 4 0) H U)W7 w a IA j�Z� Cr W J W//;r//,' / -/ r' pz Z U>U 2Q UW' W W ZZz i r ‘Lo 0 ' 'n W 7 Q Q u) 1-z < al�7 •;/, o c.i / 43 i n/��, a� z Q F ci a O �p CC z ,•' / qW Z N U� Q -I-= pp WW w / �,/ //0 '.�� USN NC CL 0 x p Q 2_2X CO LO O o /'/ , J LL,-,...o (T) F- �� a / %i/ ii y / // / Wrn CC _W LL U /' j'i i i j%' /' / / U Z J O ;: i i' Q W / /i /i ii ,// C4 U / iii'i / ,/ , / cc � iw W / ' i / /u /,-2i / ;iLL F W / ,/',/' %f i/ /� ' �" iW �QF ao o� '� % /,j1 s xx111 - QoW a 020 �;:s %-• 1I s � UJ 0 ��• .%�6 ��/ �N mm3 �' a 'i�'�-' 1 m 'g. 3 "" -,moi - 1I W • • • • ii,°. i - a ' / p V W0. __________ _ `/� I I •�1�I• N • ›i e rte, N^��/ ? J ''� 'r * W o Z IN I! a 0I I b -J Q p a rli U I re zI w }W 1 5 1 ! wa go � I 0D win c � 1 w� i ¢� a m Z '{�•• .• Q J6 8 }Q I CC m W i Z J c ��4' 1 WW .LL' • Q QQ <0 1]J it OW s 01 z w . •' w p ¢ 0� z� w 1 [mo, iaw CCZ o� <z FW-� 1 F_0 zW Ia Q> 1 z w W g Cosa o� 1 ] in dz __11CL W � w 1 ¢ Qo o Z Ili F p I 0< �' 0 0 I Z = i �0 II (0 .I 1 a re cc i I w � a •0).•••• Iii II o j ....."._i, .[X••••••••••••••••••••,•••,•••••••,• I . • • . • • • • • • • i 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J (.00 W0 J x La J co 0 <0> w0 wz co x W W d 0 J(n Q Qz co ix ixow iw Q -d F J QZ2..- Q ce0 u1 O_ W Z O? 0 0) N 7 R wr:a. 5,'ru mx�.10w SOd�vurA -? 5 0 G\Orerama -6 ,U1 .p' z� ri ,fJ .Q 'r,QWVSixdoa)ego-' s�umwnx � 4. � 1_......:„ �� ,,Q w.vb\tnu ; ...\ - . ,-...... --..1---;*,7`..----* "'1- -;!4.,','--':4; N,we a a- W on`' n s 0 0� a��, t `Lt ` a{ n el 7xr �,�az, E La - .a �s m'roo 11.:` a O Ula H V wEt J V O '$ a aZ � c7 �`�'` CO a ittrot,..41.`4,4;-,,.2 . , ."' , „.2,'''''. "" i I i *2;1. ' 1....„t_ i 'i. a w: a ▪ - ` 'W.- -'&-,12.12•PeMt...—"°' = 7 t W I a < Q ' ▪ 4 !ill ,.-1 wco i' s s m CC a I . F a cc A o 11111111 w '. 7 7, . / Min. ' €° w _J = UJ J O 0 , 201• ' §IIIIIIIIB a o r a > I Z z , Z S - t 14A )) Friday, May 13,2016 )) NAPLES DAILY NEWS PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 2nd,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida amending Ordinance No.2014- 34,the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development,and amending Ordinance No.2004-41,the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 12.17±acres of land zoned Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD;by adding 48 residential dwelling units for a total of 162 residential dwelling units or by adding 150 group housing units for a total of 500 group housing units;by amending the master plan;by repealing Ordinance No.11-18,the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD;and by providing an effective date.The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Learning Lane and Livingston Road,in Section 13,Township 48 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida consisting of 40.55±acres.[PUDZ-PL20150001613] 0 0 TUSCANY QUAIL Z RESERVE WEST \ (DRI) MEDITERRA co 12 PEZZETINO 7 8 DI CIELO MEDITERRA VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. 0o RMC - PROJECT iN; ENCLAVE ROSH LOCATION GRACE BRANDON ROMANIAN QUAIL BAPTIST CREEK CHURCHROYAL PALM 13 PELICAN n> ACADEMY STRAND W O z 17 (DRI) 18 ti 3 o m W MARSILE wU VILLAS A MADEIRA z of All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor,Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail,Suite#401,Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,June 2nd,2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman No.1076944 May 13.2016 6,, 2, /6, CCPc. /gym � f3 JohnsonEric kr-1G J uhnsrr�. From: StrainMark Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:22 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: PL2015...1613 June 2 2016 meeting Please distribute as typical Mark/ 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, a-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-mail address reLeased in response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: B Prins [mailto:bnprins@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:57 PM To: StrainMark Subject: PL2015...1613 June 2 2016 meeting Hello Mr. Strain; Thank you for taking the time to read my email. I would like to voice my concerns regarding the June 2 meeting for the Collier County Planning Commission for PL2015-1613 RMC- Enclave. I believe that is the correct identifier. I am a resident of Camden Lakes, located at Livingston and Learning Lane in North Naples. One of the reasons we moved into this neighborhood is because it is surrounded by other single family home developments. We understood that there was the possibility of a church being built on this land, but now the developer is proposing a 500 unit senior living facility, which would be five or six stories tall. There is a big difference between a church steeple and what is basically a high rise apartment building. This area is populated by single family homes, a high rise building would not be compatible with the surrounding homes and a family environment. Please feel free to contact me to discuss. Thank you for your attention to my concerns. Thank you Nanette Prins Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 JohnsonEric From: Mike Omann <mikeom@ATS-INC.com> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:55 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Camden Lakes Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Mike Omann 320-217-4579 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. 1 JohnsonEric From: Cesar Taveras <ctaveras72@gmail.corn> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:42 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Camden Lakes Dear Commissioner Strain: I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. Cesar Taveras 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 11:22 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Please distribute as typical Mark/ 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: George King [mailto:george©grizzled.com] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 10:47 AM To: StrainMark Subject: Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. George King 16293 Camden Lakes Circle Naples, FL 34110 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 4:19 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Opposed to Senior Housing Project Please distribute as typical Math 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address reLeased in response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: M K [mailto:martikaren@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 3:56 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Opposed to Senior Housing Project Dear Mr. Strain, I am a resident of Camden Lakes and I am emailing you to voice my concern about the future Enclave Development on your agenda for the meeting on 6/2/2016. I am opposed to a Senior Group Housing Project and I hope you will vote against this project as well. I feel that single family homes would be the best use of the land and would keep a consistent feel and character to the surrounding area. The developer may alternatively request single family homes for the Enclave Development, and I feel this would be a welcomed addition to our neighborhood and keep homogeneity to the area. Thank you for taking the time to read this and for your careful consideration on this important vote. Karen Marti Excuse my typos! Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:06 AM To: JohnsonEric Attachments: Camden Lakes; Camden Lakes Please disburse as typical Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 10:35 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Request From Resident of Camden Lakes Please distribute as typical Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Original Message From: Stephen A. Rogers [mailto:sarogers@intemed.com] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 10:29 AM To: RomanCharlette Cc: ChrzanowskiStan; StrainMark; HomiakKaren; EbertDiane Subject: Request From Resident of Camden Lakes Dear Ms. Roman, We are residents of Camden Lakes emailing you to voice our concern about the Enclave Development proposal on your agenda for the June 2nd, 2016 meeting. We are opposed to the Senior Group Housing Facility project and hope that you will align with our interests and will vote against this project. We feel that single family homes would be the best use of this land as it would keep a consistent feel and character to the surrounding communities. As an alternative, we believe that Enclave Development would be open to constructing single family homes on the site. We feel that this would be a welcome addition to our neighborhood and will keep homogeneity to the area. Thank you for taking the time to consider this request. Regards, Ellyn and Stephen Rogers 16329 Camden Lakes Circle Naples, FL 34110 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. i JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:06 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Opposition to Enclave Development Please disburse as typical Marl. 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a pubLic records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: Klein, Charmaine [mailto:Charmaine.Klein@aciworldwide.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:33 PM To: aolis@cohenaw.com; dianeebert@coliergov.net; wfassaad@hotmail.com; HomiakKaren; StrainMark; ChrzanowskiStan; RomanCharlette Subject: Opposition to Enclave Development Dear Commissioners: I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. The area is located on the corner of Livingston Road and School Access Road for North Naples Middle School. This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I recently moved to Naples for work and specifically chose this area because it was family oriented and offered my daughter an environment that was kid friendly and family friendly. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. Charmaine Klein Global Business Leader, Payment Strategy Consumer Payments Product Management 1 Telephone: 239-403-4593 charmaine.klein@aciworldwide.com ACI Worldwide,3520 Kraft Road,Suite 300,Naples, FL 34105 www.aciworldwide.com UNIVERSALACI COPAYMENTS . PUTS CUSTOMERS FIRST This email message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or non-public information. The information is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this email, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon this information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the author personally. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: June 2 meeting - please consider Please disburse as typical Ma-rk/ 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address released in response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: Jimmy crick [mailto:crickcovenant@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:51 PM To: StrainMark Subject: June 2 meeting - please consider Dear Commissioner Strain: I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. For His Glory, Samantha Crick For His Glory, Jimmy and Samantha 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: June 2 meeting: opposing senior living facility Please disburse as typical Ma-k/ 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Jimmy Crick[mailto:jpcsoccerl7@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:42 PM To: StrainMark Subject: June 2 meeting: opposing senior living facility Dear Commissioners, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. James P. Crick,Jr., PT, DPT Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Learning Lane - Senior Living Facility Please disburse as typical Mark/ 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address reLeased in response to a pubLic records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: John S. Sarrett [mailto:jsarrett@sarrettlaw.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:36 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Learning Lane - Senior Living Facility Dear Commissioner: My family and I reside in the Camden Lakes community, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. My wife and I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, and be a potential risk to along the students, including my children, at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I will remind the commissioner that the county does not provide buses for the children living in Camden Lakes, and the increased traffic a senior living facility would create could be an extreme danger for these young children walking to school. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. John S. Sarrett JOHN S. SARRETT,P.A. 999 Vanderbilt Beach Road Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 Main: (239) 325-3350 1 Direct: (239) 330-2359 Facsimile: (239) 790-5063 Website: www.sarrettlaw.com Sent from my iPhone Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Camden Lakes Please disburse as typical Mark/ 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Alex Chinea [mailto:achinea4@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:30 PM To: HomiakKaren; asolis@cohenlaw.com; EbertDiane; wfassaad©hotmail.com; StrainMark Subject: Camden Lakes Dear Commissioners, I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. Alex Chinea Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:04 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Sr housing Please disburse as typical Mark/ 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-maiL address released in response to a public records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: Scott Mcconnell [mailto:swmccon@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 6:02 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Sr housing Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Sent from iPad Scott McConnell Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:04 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Opposition to Enclave Development Please disburse-as typical 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address reLeased in response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: CVRC [mailto:cvrc1226@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:57 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Opposition to Enclave Development Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. We are very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. We worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. We hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Best Wishes, Christy and Norman Ruiz-Castafieda 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:19 AM To: JohnsonEric Attachments: Multi Senior Dwellings Proposed near Camden Lakes; Enclave Development; Enclave Developers Please distribute as typical Ma-i-ki 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity,Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: greg pryer <gulfcrest@centurylink.net> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 10:03 AM To: charlerreroman@colliergov.net; ChrzanowskiStan; StrainMark; wfassaad@hotmail.com; EbertDiane; asolis@cohenlaw.com; HorniakKaren Subject: Enclave Developers Dear Commissioner, When I was searching for a community in which to purchase my home, I was impressed with Camden Lakes as it contained only single family homes as did the surrounding communities. The zoning around us did not allow high rise housing so this was the perfect place to buy my home as it would remain low density. I don't think that a commercial senior group high rise housing project is the correct use of land surrounding our community. We are family neighborhoods and would like it to remain that way. I hope we can count on you to not approve this project. Thank you, Gregory W. Pryer 16202 Camden Lakes Cir. Naples, Fl. 34110 239-596-3499 1 JohnsonEric From: greg pryer <gulfcrest@centurylink.net> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 10:26 AM To: HomiakKaren Cc: asolis@cohenlaw.com; dianeebert@colliegov.net; wfassaad ; StrainMark; ChrzanowskiStan; RomanCharlette Subject: Enclave Development Eric J. Palm 16202 Camden Lakes Cir.,Naples, Fl. 34110 Dear Commissioner, I would like you to oppose the high rise senior housing project being proposed by Enclave Development. Our community, Camden Lakes, is comprised solely of single family homes as are our surrounding developments. The best use of this land would be to retain the low density single family development which I understand that the developer has proposed as an alternative use. We would very much appreciate your opposing the commercial high rise senior project in favor of the single family concept. Thank you, Eric J. Palm 1 JohnsonEric From: Jan Epperson <janpepp316@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 2:34 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Multi Senior Dwellings Proposed near Camden Lakes Dear Commissioner Strain, - - I am writing to ask you NOT to allow the zoning to be changed so that these "Multi Dwelling Buildings" can be built near "Camden Lakes" on "Livingston." I live in Camden Lakes near my daughter and her husband and 3 children. These buildings would cause so much more traffic on "Livingston" and "Learning Lane." This is where my Grandchildren walk to school and ride their bikes. It is a safe and wonderful residential area now for many families to raise their children, I would hate to see this change. I don't understand why " Multi Dwelling Buildings" would be allowed to be build amongst many residential areas such as "Camden Lakes." I am in Seattle and will not be able to be at the meeting but will be hoping and praying that you do NOT allow this zoning to be changed and these buildings to be built. Thanks you for your time, Jan Epperson 16229 Camden Lakes Circle Naples, Fl. 34110 Mobile 425-478-9334 JohnsonEric From: RomanCharlette Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:26 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: BellowsRay Subject: RE: Open Space calculation • Thanks Eric. I may want to clarify that on Thursday. Charlette From: JohnsonEric Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:17 PM To: RomanCharlette Cc: BellowsRay Subject: RE: Open Space calculation Commissioner Roman, The LDC defines as open space as"Areas that are not occupied by buildings, impervious parking areas, streets, driveways or loading areas and which may be equipped or developed with amenities designed to encourage the use and enjoyment of the space either privately or by the general public. Examples of open space include: areas of preserved indigenous native vegetation; areas replanted with vegetation after construction; lawns, landscaped areas and greenways; outdoor recreational facilities; and plazas, atriums, courtyards and other similar public spaces." With respect to your question, front yards can be considered open space if designed in compliance with the above. As far as what the applicant intends by"other open space areas,"I have to assume anything that qualifies as open space consistent with the above definition, excluding water management and buffer areas. Eric Johnson Principal Planner From: RomanCharlette Sent:Tuesday, May 31,2016 11:39 AM To:Johnson Eric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Cc: BellowsRay<RayBellows@colliergov.net> Subject:Open Space calculation Eric, How is total open space calculated for a project, i.e. what all is counted?Are front yards considered open space? Regarding RMC-Enclave, what are "other open space areas?" Thank you. Charlette JohnsonEric From: Kraiza, Jonathan <jkraiza@massmutual.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 11:39 AM To: StrainMark Subject: 6/2 Agenda: Enclave Developers - opposition to Senior Group Housing Commissioner Strain, I am emailing you to voice my concern about the future Enclave Development on your agenda for the meeting on June 2nd As a resident of Camden Lakes,the residential community adjacent to this land,we selected this location due to the great schools and fantastic family residential corridor that this portion of Livingston Road has become. A commercial business with apartment style/high rise buildings and workers on staff simply does not fit well in this area. This type of business could negatively impact everyone living in the surrounding area as well as the students of nearby Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I understand the developer is also considering single family homes for the Enclave Development, and I feel this is the best use of the land and would keep a consistent feel and character to the area. Thank you for your careful consideration on this important vote. Jonathan Kraiza This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary,privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the person(s)to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. 1 JohnsonEric From: Dominic Polito <djpolito97@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 1:33 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Senior Group Housing Facility Dear Mark Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. My wife and I are retired and have put our savings into this property. We believe that our property values will decrease dramatically if this facility is built. We are hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Dominic and Joan Polito 16306 Winfield Lane Naples, FL 34110 Camden Lakes Residents JohnsonEric From: Joanna Ritchie <joannaritchie@bellsouth.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:30 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Development on Livingston Road Hi Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Sincerely, James and Joanna Ritchie 16171 Cartwright Ln, Naples, FL 34110 239-443-8161 1 JohnsonEric From: Nicole Marco <nicolemarco@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:46 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Re: Enclave Dear Commissioner Strain: I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. Nicole & Peter Marco JohnsonEric From: Peter Marco <Pete.Marco@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:30 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane From: Peter Marco Sent:Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:23 PM To: Markstrain@colliergov.com Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane Mark, I am written in concern to the Enclave project across from Camden Lakes community on Livingston road. I am a current resident in Camden Lakes, and my children will be attending North Naples Middle school over the next several years. I have great concerns about proposal to add a secondary access on learning lane. I believe the additional traffic will create risk to children that will be walking and biking to school. The increase in traffic will cause congestion at the intersection that will increase possibility of accidents. Since this access is only secondary and not essential, I ask that you reject the builder request to add the additional access on learning lane. Thank you! Peter Marco 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 1:30 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane Please distribute as typical lAcuirki 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send eLectronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: Peter Marco [mailto:Pete.Marco@outlook.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:30 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane From: Peter Marco Sent:Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:23 PM To: Markstrain@colliergov.com Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane Mark, I am written in concern to the Enclave project across from Camden Lakes community on Livingston road. I am a current resident in Camden Lakes, and my children will be attending North Naples Middle school over the next several years. I have great concerns about proposal to add a secondary access on learning lane. I believe the additional traffic will create risk to children that will be walking and biking to school. The increase in traffic will cause congestion at the intersection that will increase possibility of accidents. Since this access is only secondary and not essential, I ask that you reject the builder request to add the additional access on learning lane. Thank you! Peter Marco JohnsonEric From: William Benavitz <rosemary.benavitz@icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:24 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Oppose Enclave Developers Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Sincerely, Rosemary Benavitz Sent from my iPhone 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 7:15 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: requesting your consideration of petition #PUDA-PL-2015-1613 Please distribute as typical Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-maiL addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a pubLic records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Tanya Bosco [mailto:tanya.bosco@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:20 AM To: HomiakKaren; asolis@cohenlaw.com; EbertDiane; wtassaad@hotmail.com; StrainMark Subject: requesting your consideration of petition #PUDA-PL-2015-1613 Good morning, Ms Homiak, Mr Solis, Ms Ebert, Mr Assaad, Mr Strain, Mr Chrzanowski, and Ms Roman, I am writing to you all collectively as a member of the Camden Lakes subdivision, a wonderful community of single family homes in North Naples. I am also a concerned homeowner hoping to garner your support on an issue that could have a lasting impact on the lives of my family and all those living here in Camden Lakes. I am highly opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility on the plot of land referenced in the subject line, located at the intersection of Learning Lane and Livingston Road. Not only would a multi-style/high rise building with its many workers and staff to support a senior living facility destroy the single family home experience of our community, but also this type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides and has the potential to destroy preserved land that was a major draw for us as residents. I am deeply concerned that this type of facility will detract from the appearance and value of our neighborhood, and more important, will pose a great risk to our community's students at both Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle Schools with increaded traffic and service vehicles, as well as a commercial vehicle increase. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held this morning and support single family homes instead while maintaining as much of the preserve as possible to maintain the environment and aesthetics. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Best Regards, Tanya Bosco 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 1:29 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Enclsve Development Attachments: Enclave Strain.pdf Please distribute as typical Mawk' 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:john fritzel [mailto:fritzelcj©yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 10:48 AM To: StrainMark Subject: Enclsve Development Mark, Please find our attached objection to the Enclave Development. We feel it would negatively impact our property values. It does not fit with the single family corridor on Livingston Road. There are several assisted or senior housing units at Livingston and Vanderbilt to meet the needs of seniors in the area. Respectfully, John and Charlene Fritzel 16112 Camden Lakes Circle Naples, Fla. 34110 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 7-T1 fi ";1---t' .7 L 1 (--• 4E- 2-...-• ' 17 . z , Dear Commissioner.11/ .4,-e"4 )óáJ My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. ,..../- 7&t,,,2 //6 //.2 ,..,.. ' / 7 • Table A Land Use Trips Daily Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Trips Generated Trips Generated Trips Generated Size (ADT) (vph) (vph) Single-Family 48 d.u.'s 535 43 54 (LUC 210) 7 Senior Housing 150 d.u.'s 516 30 38 (LUC 252) ALF 150 d.u.'s 411 27 44 (LUC 254) CCR Community 150 d.u.'s 375 41 79 (LUC 255) 0 Church 500 Seats 925 305 N/A (LUC 560) (Sunday) (Sunday) O Daycare Center 150 Students 657 120 108 (LUC 565) 1 IV.nl•wwv ti—- A$ as - N =� ?OQZ WQO � 11 7. -1-i- �� w ¢mow W lii1 2 J U I-2 2 W m' W H O / •�r oy CO wQ U) ZCCO Oa zza / fi _I- ¢ �Itn O H OOH !jr `-'�0. 6 6X 0 < Wg / % / �o �P 7gQO w o=6z /s' ,r �� g yWy O.<C>I h1i' U / 'r �rai OC Z} 8. O O N / rjr ri. . j=:,,D ULLO Jy o c 2 / �� O .r�'i�� D El 1p V. C LSiI Z ,j� r� r!! W Z lo O O �!W O , "rr err r%Rr W Z7 N 07 F F 222 >C 0 ' !i' /,'$',y., /? U.JN JO Q J H W> > / •Y/ //-• i• tao Z r2 a �0l < f/)W K i ��'IY S : qjma o a / !i' i i r7' / r W 0 LLC')cr , :, 0 ' � 6 Z L p , • ' ,' i' d;t '' i / V C W ly /'.4;;';''' . Y / r UCIn . i 9 (n 0 .,:e',/,/ r r Y iii i ,9%,, i co to Iii 0 'J ' i r ,,cr /X LULL r %'' J F- p lay / i.:' /'i r / asn z ;.9 .1I Z tii Fj /� '��,� `/1- i ' 2� p S�p ,�' / II llri' II Q�y gR. oho yam, ' N 0 / �%% / LL - i_' '�'' i'' I 9 1 C _-"� ------ ,!' / I I C ill o 11 '' _ `' f I LL o ,, w w m Z e p I 0 0 Z Z ®se w 1 lwu N� > • Q ofgqe t/' F O • J a s J S • • C . W d i p IL I OOti u. 1 w i • gLry wcr Z U' • {• L'•'•' I y a l H W .�. .•. i g 1 QV' i� Oly o Iwo Z ww i law Cv a.O OJ .A. I ZZz W I 1z0 ZY o w _,S QZ 1 Z ;O_ dZ I C ii O> ( w a 1 W • ••�• Ii I1 O I �� • • • • • • • H 0 jco J CO 0 W a= 00 al 0 wxww a? Q 0 O K =al J ozffa Qtxo w •• Q Z zw w OND OtWp N D I s.uo _. J --..0.—z--am A wii U 71-7 C- Q a ' Q �a r.' t , . W ,O . o N f.P ` a • O =z Z X , _". :: O CO •4 w; oz; 5 W t ww C] O W ::. A p ,',40 o WSa O O L1.1 CC Q Q I— .4. �, EOw Z � n I / . _, ;I; f 8NC SOCA ' f ifir- Fi LU P x - wi II -. .,. I- ry Idv I e .._. 'w I oI . 3 iriQ S Z Y t I' a o ; I § 0 ab LJ 0 7- Q d. I_ a +CL _ w I 0 " I:I'l I" ‘—'1:23 ll n. i Q �' `' w cl': O �. Z z a O W = ' zu U ., ' z I • '. IIIIIIIIG O � a. N q. r L _ ______ ......_ MOP MM. NEM =Elk ! I 11 O O W ' U R c N i W J 1141 _i S 3 Q 111111110 dQ "et IIIIIIIIH Q D e p� ` - Z W 4 k13'' ' r O *Y t 4 1 tatia ii. i A.10- PUDZ-PL20140000890 6/2/16 Teresa L. Cannon Onyx RPUD From: BeasleyRachel <RachelBeasley@colliergov.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 12:10 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: JohnsonEric;Ann P.Jennejohn; Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael; Kendall, Marcia; Lang, Ashley; Neet, Virginia; Rodriguez,Wanda Subject: Onyx RPUD advertisement request Attachments: Onyx RPUD (2x3) Map.pdf; Onyz RPUD Advertisement Request.docx; Signature Page.pdf Good afternoon, Please advertise the Onyx RPUD petition attachments for the June 2, 2016, CCPC hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department— Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 Cofer County Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 May 03, 2016 Collier County Planning Commission Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on May 13, 2016, and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Eric Johnson, Principal Planner in the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section] FUND&COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number: 068778 Authorl ed Designee signature for CCPC Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,June 2nd, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project known as the Onyx RPUD to allow development of up to 48 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 10±acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 06-53 and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20140000890] (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to Thursday,June 2nd, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman \f §� /$ ‘7,§ ,z COUNTY BARN ROAD J $— » ¥P |$ / .2 — ./ — ' rJ —1�$ � ,f 7T@A - ,k d 11 4\ / / / 8 r ƒ§ 2$ Li¥ &. 0 $ k (_ > � 2. 2 T ;z ''''; '-^— — m B CI — . ,§ | k q § $ ° p§ \k k ` C1 �L BOULEVARD Teresa L. Cannon From: Minutes and Records To: BeasleyRachel Subject: RE: Onyx RPUD advertisement request I will send the proof as soon as I receive it. From: BeasleyRachel [mailto:RachelBeasley@colliergov.net] Sent:Tuesday, May 03, 2016 12:10 PM To: Minutes and Records<MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com> Cc:JohnsonEric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net>; Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com>; Bellows, Ray <RayBellows@colliergov.net>; Bosi, Michael<MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; Kendall, Marcia <MarciaKendall@colliergov.net>; Lang, Ashley<ashleylang@colliergov.net>; Neet,Virginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; Rodriguez, Wanda <WandaRodriguez@colliergov.net> Subject:Onyx RPUD advertisement request Good afternoon, Please advertise the Onyx RPUD petition attachments for the June 2, 2016, CCPC hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department— Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 C,citirer Cow my Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Acct. #068778 May 4, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples News Media Group 1100 Immokalee Rd. Naples, Florida 34110 Re: PUDZ-PL20140000890 — Onyx RPUD (Display AD w/Map) Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced Notice W/Map on Friday, May 13, 2016, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teresa Cannon, Deputy Clerk P.O. # 4500161942 May 04, 2016 Collier County Planning Commission Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on May 13, 2016, and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Minutes & Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#401, Naples, Florida 34112. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section] FUND & COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number: 068778 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, June 2nd, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project known as the Onyx RPUD to allow development of up to 48 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 10± acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 06-53 and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20140000890] (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite #401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to Thursday, June 2nd, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman §f jA , �Z ° 3 rA �m BARN ROAD ] r', $ }i.1 g\ � . f /E —1p?",F, j ` _J� z «SANTA \J7 / — $�� §� § Gs ,� 22 /& 2( Li ` `§®\ e 2: E & 0 Q i t §� \ m 9 a § |K ° k % ) $ ` g§ \k § e ' |; I �LBOULEVARD Teresa L. Cannon From: Teresa L. Cannon Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:36 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals; Gori, Ivonne (ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com) Subject: PUDZ-PL20140000890 - Onyx RPUD Attachments: PUDZ-PL20140000890 (CCPC 6-2-16).doc; PUDZ-PL20140000890 (CCPC 6-2-16).doc; PUDZ-PL20140000890 (CCPC 6-2-16).pdf Lega Is, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday, May 13, 2016.Thanks Teresa Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes & Records Department 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 1:49 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: PUDZ-PL20140000890 - Onyx RPUD Confirmed receipt Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist 1a}rlrr. will;Naos I OVATZAKY Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent:Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:36 AM To: Legals NDN<legals@naplesnews.com>; Gori, Ivonne<ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: PUDZ-PL20140000890-Onyx RPUD Lega Is, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday, May 13,2016.Thanks Teresa Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes & Records bepartment 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient,you must not copy,distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. Unless expressly stated,opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailing helpdesk©collierclerk.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents.The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Gori,Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:51 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: Proof 1077182 Attachments: N DN 61077182.pdf Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist 'S'ali t1AB NOUS I , w'omi Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE(S) Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, June 2nd, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County,Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district for a project known as the Onyx RPUD to allow development of up to 48 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16,Township 50 South, Range 26 East,Collier County, Florida, consisting of 10± acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 06-53 and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20140000890] DAVIS BLVD. I (S.R.84)I I I NAPLES HERITAGE J FREE ATE I COOK NAPLES GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PROPERTY HEGIITAGE I TAORMINA sEACREST ¢¢ RESERVE OLF AND FALLINGUPPER ATERSS Q 0� _ COUNTRY NAPLES NATIONAL RECOPE SERVE SCHOOL 1 ',—� l- C Q 9 GOLF CLUB I _ 10 �� i m J e I--O Zam Di HOMES OF ISLANDIA SHADOW- LASIP CONSERVATION AREA RIVIERA < HAVEN I WATERFORD WOO PROJECT O ESTATES cc a-r-s a 17 1 LOCATION W J 7 ROYAL WOODS 16 m Z G&C CLUB HUNTNGTON 15 0 WOODS MANDALAY NAPLES LAKES V 1 WIND- SHADOW- COUNTRY CLUB OJ SONG (C.R.864) / WOOD O RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD. 7 I All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier I County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite #401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,June 2nd,2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman No.1077182 May 12.2016 Teresa L. Cannon To: Neet, Virginia; BeasleyRachel (RachelBeasley@colliergov.net);JohnsonEric (EricJohnson@colliergov.net) Subject: FW: Proof 1077182 Attachments: NDNB1077182.pdf Please review From:Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:51 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: Proof 1077182 Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist ,l DAB 1k'ltta I $WORK Office: 239.213.6061 I vonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Neet, Virginia Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 1:10 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: FW: Proof 1077182 From: AshtonHeidi Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 1:10 PM To: NeetVirginia; CrotteauKathynell Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 Approved. hi ai'tideoa-eiiclo Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 From: NeetVirginia Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 9:09 AM To: AshtonHeidi; CrotteauKathynell Subject: FW: Proof 1077182 Heidi: Would you mind approving this in Wanda's absence? Dinny From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:57 PM To: NeetVirginia; BeasleyRachel; JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Proof 1077182 Please review From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:51 PM To:Teresa L.Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: Proof 1077182 Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Teresa L. Cannon Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 2:10 PM To: 'Gori,Ivonne' Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 Ad looks good,ok to run! From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:51 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: Proof 1077182 Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist 1aNews I ami Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 6:28 PM To: Ashton, Heidi Cc: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: FW: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Attachments: NDNB1077182.pdf; Ordinance (Apr 26 2016).pdf; Onyx RPUD (PL20140000890) Heidi, Is the ten(10)acres in the attached okay or should it be 8.72 as reflected in the PUD Document? Eric Johnson Principal Planner From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent:Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:57 PM To: NeetVirginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; BeasleyRachel <RachelBeasley@colliergov.net>;Johnson Eric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: FW: Proof 1077182 Please review From:Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori(Wnaplesnews.com] Sent:Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:51 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: Proof 1077182 Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist �iaplk' aili;News NE WDAUSAORK Office: Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Sent: Wednesday,April 20, 2016 7:20 AM To: Ashton, Heidi Subject: Onyx RPUD (PL20140000890) Attachments: CURRENT Title (Dec 30 2015).pdf Heidi, I realize you haven't completed your review yet, and the attached title is from December...does it matter if the survey shows the subject property as 8.72 acres but the Title indicates +/- 10 acres? Just wondering. Thanks! EJ 1 ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL RMF-6 ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS THE ONYX RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 48 SINGLE FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE NORTH OF RATTLESNAKE- HAMMOCK ROAD IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 10± ACRES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 06-53 AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20140000890] WHEREAS, Tim Hancock,AICP of Stantec,representing Polly Ave. LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 16, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a 10± acre project to be known as the Onyx RPUD to allow up to 48 residential dwelling units in accordance with the RPUD Documents attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "F" and incorporated herein by reference. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Repeal of Ordinance No. 06-53. Ordinance No. 06-53 is hereby repealed in its entirety. [14-CPS-01384/1230768/1]72 Onyx RPUD\PUDZ-PL20140000890 4/26/16 1 of 2 SECTION THREE: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ,2016. ATTEST BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk DONNA FIALA, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko 4\ Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A—Permitted Uses Exhibit B—Development Standards Exhibit C—Master Plan Exhibit D—Legal Description Exhibit E—Deviations Exhibit F—Developer Commitments [14-CPS-01384/1230768/1]72 Onyx RPUD\PUDZ-PL20140000890 4/26/16 2 of EXHIBIT A FOR ONYX RPUD PERMITTED USES: This 8.72 acre residential project shall be developed with up to 48 residential dwelling units, through utilization of Transfer of Development Right (TDR) credits, or up to 35 residential dwelling units without the use of TDR credits and may be developed with single family, townhouses, multifamily, or a mixture of the three, subject to the development standards contained herein. The project density will be a maximum of 5.5 residential units per gross acre. Prior to SDP and/or plat approval for dwelling units in excess of the 35 base units, the owner must provide documentation that the required number of TDR credits have been redeemed to permit the additional 13 dwelling units for a maximum dwelling unit count of 48. The owner must provide the necessary individual TDR credit tracking numbers for each TDR credit required as a separate exhibit to the SDP and/or plat application titled TDR Credit Verification Sheet. The Master Concept Plan shall be designed to ensure the harmonious placement of all of the uses in a manner that achieves maximum compatibility with the nearby neighborhood, and one that incorporates a uniform plan of development enhanced by complimentary landscape improvements. Residential (RI The maximum number of residential dwelling units shall not exceed 48 units. Residential development will be designed to accommodate single-family, townhouse, or multi- family dwelling types, compatible recreational facilities, essential services and customary accessory uses. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following primary uses: A. Principal Uses 1. Multi-family dwellings 2. Single-family dwellings,including zero lot line 3. Townhouses 4. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Temporary Uses 1. Model units Page 1 of 10 Onyx RPUD PL20140000890 Revised May 3,2016 2. Project information and Sales centers 3. Construction administrative offices for the developer and authorized contractors and consultants, including temporary access ways and parking areas. 4. Sales and administrative offices for the developer, project management or managing development association, including temporary access ways and parking areas. C. Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this District. 2. Community Use Area (inclusive of recreation facilities and maintenance structures) 3. Garages. 4. Administration facilities intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 5. Swimming Pools, Tennis courts and other similar recreational facilities and buildings to serve residents and their guests. 6. Guardhouses and Gatehouses 7. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. Amenity Center (AC) A. Principal Uses 1. Community Use Area (inclusive of recreation facilities and maintenance structures) 2. Administration facilities intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 3. Swimming Pools, Tennis courts and other similar recreational facilities and buildings to serve residents and their guests. 4. Guardhouses and Gatehouses Page 2 of 10 Onyx RPUD PL20140000890 Revised May 3,2016 5. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. B.Temporary Uses 1. Project information and Sales centers 2. Construction administrative offices for the developer and authorized contractors and consultants, including temporary access ways and parking areas. 3. Sales and administrative offices for the developer, project management or managing development association, including temporary access ways and parking areas. C. Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this District. Preserve (P) A. Principal Uses 1. Preserves. B. Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Non-paved biking, hiking, and nature trails, and boardwalks. 2. Water management structures required by permitting agencies. 3. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries. Page 3 of 10 Onyx RPUD PL20140000890 Revised May 3,2016 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for Single-Family and Multi-Family Residential land uses within the proposed Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. TABLE I - RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MULTI-FAMILY SINGLE-FAMILY AMENITY DWELLING & DWELLING / ZERO CENTER ACCESSORY TOWNHOUSE LOT LINE (AC) STRUCTURES (R) (I MINIMUM LOT AREA N/A 3,500 square feet N/A N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 60 Feet 35 Feet N/A N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF 900 square 750 square BUILDINGS feet (per unit) 1,000 square feet feet N/A MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 70 feet 70 feet 35 feet 35 feet (From Polly Avenue) MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 150 feet 150 feet 150 feet 150 feet (From Sunset Avenue) MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet (From Santa Barbara Avenue) MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 20 feet 20 feet 15 feet 15 feet (From Adkins Ave ROW) MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES Principal Structure 25 feet 12 feet N/A Accessory Structure 15 feet 0 or 10 feet 10 feet SPS MINIMUM INTERNAL SETBACKS Front Yard 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Side Yard 20 feet 6 feet, or 0' on one 10 feet 10 feet side and 12'on the other Rear Yard 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet LAKES 20 feet 20 feet PRESERVE 25 feet 10 feet MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 2 stories & 35 1 story &25 feet 2 stories & 35 feet feet 35 feet 2 stories & 42 1 story & 25 MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT feet 2 stories & 42 feet feet 42 feet Footnotes apply to all tracts and lots in the PUD: Page 4 of 10 Onyx RPUD PL20140000890 Revised May 3,2016 1. Setback from a lake tract for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design. Architectural bank treatments shall include any structural materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed per LDC requirements. 2. If the parcel is directly accessed by a public or private road right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent road right-of-way line and or easement line per the LDC. Sidewalks shall be located in the road right-of-way. 3. If the parcel is directly accessed by a private driveway, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge-of-pavement (if not curbed).This would apply to multi- family development tracts that do not have platted road rights-of-way. 4. Front yard setback from the back of sidewalk to the face of the garage door must be a minimum of 23 feet for internal private roads. Page 5 of 10 Onyx RPUD PL20140000890 Revised May 3,2016 w --��N V 1- I- a * e 2E o e ez * a ' Z 2 O t` to .-- r N CO N de :i LLO M M N ' 8I I- 4 t0 U tL .- .- C.) .- .- LU ›- {E_ M LLI 0) N cc ) ; r to 4 P J Z �i j V O r N O .- •- O O 00 Z W Z co Q li , Z 0 - f� w co W G V -7 0 — Q 9 d Q 1Y w W 1 N 0 u• Z fl Q Lu W W z .. •• W (Wj W N = 5 0 o, g m0 cc Q w i W NdZmo afi5 � o § wv A o 1-- g 1r w 0. C7 a 1- ? Z o N u d ,1 § W F Z 2 o W ¢ 3 < z u' z a °° C W p z0 N z Z W 0u. w Q W Q cc Q U w Q W W Z C9 I- W I- W 0 .al e- 0 O G. 8 Z "" x x re L1 Z c) 9 a3�1-• ce o z w uWi a o ¢J z a a a a a Q ....1 La' 5 °oN 1- a a 3 a a o a � a � a a agQ U C) (mOw.OS)0A1S 13SNf1S AWVONI108 J.03Qad .-C--- — 1 4P!�Nt• E . . I s 1 C 86 �': � Cl_ U mm1 i P '.' '- °' W Wg 1 w N • TU , Q ' 2 ii i! Wyk d i 1 n �iY. X C. — — li � . .�li 4 �0V ' p '� lJIOtl813S qcc I 8 i ',. RI x CC 'k:.' ' 4mI c---.. L _ p �8esu V � .• _ - ^ K piT, g t_ nvn3als xa — yJ1pr i ` _ Sr, e, 1 1 g 1 91 NOLL033 _ j LL N01J.03S ^081031'021d OavA31f109 VdV9aVe ViNVS a UUW .. 2 ':7 1{ W , a i N W 'I'LL-, E Z w LL1 Q Q I <L c w I ?Z0 _ Ci cc Z p Z Fi u. 173 f- a. o g(0 gi i s h H 3 — _ l ) � � _ / I 1SZ h. rw,.� _ ' U a Yr�yy v��a89T3'Rl�i=l�k':I k' i ? ; �. $ •. i O 9 z w 1.---------- ------n i- -::,:77. , M 7 15 z _ a '; Z i w 0 i Z -+-- D z0 — — — — w O cn H °`Lu 0 1111 I 1 i z CL °z 1 - % __ iR•1 H g — .` I T Z w x 0 - - - - - is i I ` I z W ill O I; N• pX1 f ://y 6 .. . , ._ _ •,_,._ w AINONf10B • iO3fOad z rn U Q CC o aavna1noe vaveav8 VLNYS a co W m � V X W -� _I--- 43)W V) EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (AS SHOWN IN O.R. BOOK 3864, PAGE 123) PARCEL ONE: EAST HALF (E 1/2) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET,THE EAST 30 FEET, AND THE SOUTH 30 FEET,THEREOF, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND PARCEL TWO: WEST HALF (W 1/2) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET, AND THE SOUTH 30 FEET,THEREOF, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Page 7 of 10 Onyx RPUD PL20140000890 Revised May 3,2016 EXHIBIT E DEVIATIONS: Nothing in this PUD Document shall approve a deviation to the LDC unless it is listed in this Exhibit E. 1. A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.02. A.2 which requires that a 5-foot wide sidewalk be provided on both sides of public and private rights-of-way or easements which are internal to the site, to instead provide a 5-foot wide sidewalk on one side of the private right-of-way as depicted in the master plan (Exhibit C). The sidewalk may only be omitted on one side of a street which is immediately adjacent to the rear of the structures and where no driveway accesses are provided. When residential units front on or have driveway access to both sides of a street, sidewalks shall be provided on both sides of the right of way. 2. A deviation from LDC Section 2.03.07 D.4.g which requires, upon the issuance of approval of a site development plan or subdivision plat that is part of a PUD or DRI, TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits shall be redeemed at a rate proportional to percentage of the PUD or DRI's approved gross density that is derived through TDR credits and TDR Bonus credits, to instead permit the developer to construct all units from base density (35 units) before requiring application of TDR credits. II, Page 8 of 10 Onyx RPUD PL20140000890 Revised May 3, 2016 EXHIBIT F DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS: PROPOSED DENSITY AND TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS(TDR) 1. The overall project density is 5.5 dwelling units per acre (48 unit maximum) and will be based upon surveyed acreage (8.72 acres) inclusive of existing right-of-way reservations and or easement dedications. 2. Prior to the approval of an SDP or Plat that includes any units beyond the 35 base units; required TDR credit(s) shall be redeemed from designated and qualified Sending Lands. ATTACHED GARAGE 1. Each dwelling unit shall have a garage attached to the principal structure. SOLID WASTE 1. Solid Waste will be provided by curb side pick-up of individual trash receptacles for each dwelling unit. Dumpsters will not be used for solid waste disposal, except during construction. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. Preserve Area Calculation: 7.46 acres (existing vegetation) x 15% = 1.12 acres to be preserved. PUBLIC UTILITIES 1. Water and wastewater connections will be made at locations approved at the time of SDP or subdivision plat review and final approval. TRANSPORTATION The development of the land within this PUD shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: 1. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses (both primary and ancillary) may not exceed 40 PM Peak Hour, two way trips. 2. The Owner, or its successors and assigns, shall construct a right ingress turn lane at the site's access point on Santa Barbara, which may be placed in the County right of way. A right of way permit will be required and the turn lane and all other improvements will be designed and constructed pursuant to County standards. If the County needs additional right of way now or in the future to accommodate any future turn lane, curbing, traffic signs, street lights, transit stops, sidewalk, drainage and utility improvements determined needed by County including slope and clear zones, owner Page 9 of 10 Onyx RPUD PL20140000890 Revised May 3,2016 or its successors and assigns, will convey to County road right of way up to the width and size of the County right of way used by Owner for its right ingress turn lane. Owner or its successors and assigns, will convey the road right of way to County at no cost to County within 60 days of County's written request, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. County may make more than one request for right of way and owner shall convey the requested right of way to compensate for Owner's use of the County's right of way. Owner, or its successors and assigns, shall have the option to construct a retaining wall, subject to the County's approval of the design and placement, on Owner's property outside of the existing road right of way with handrails to reduce the size of the right of way needed by County. 3. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways and sidewalks, as well as pedestrian interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer. Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. LANDSCAPING 1. In order to support a canopy tree with a minimum of 20-foot crown spread as required in LDC Section 4.06.05. individual lots must accommodate enough space for the entire 20-foot canopy tree to be located wholly within the lot boundaries, except where the lot is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement or landscape buffer easement, in which case a portion of the 20-foot canopy may protrude into such area. MONITORING REPORT One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Polly Avenue, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. Page 10 of 10 Onyx RPUD PL20140000890 Revised May 3,2016 Teresa L. Cannon From: Ashton, Heidi Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 9:57 AM To: JohnsonEric Cc: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) From your email, it sounds like the correct number is 8.72. Please run by the applicant before changing. The 10 acres likely came from the application. //eid'44to r-c%&a Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 From: JohnsonEric Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 6:28 PM To: AshtonHeidi Cc: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: FW: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Heidi, Is the ten(10)acres in the attached okay or should it be 8.72 as reflected in the PUD Document? Eric Johnson Principal Planner From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent:Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:57 PM To: NeetVirginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; BeasleyRachel<RachelBeasley@colliergov.net>;JohnsonEric <Ericlohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: FW: Proof 1077182 Please review From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:51 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: Proof 1077182 Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:10 AM To: Hancock, Tim Cc: Ashton, Heidi; Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Tim, Is it 10 acres or 8.72 acres? Please advise. Thanks! Eric Johnson Principal Planner From:AshtonHeidi Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 9:59 AM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Cc:JohnsonEric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net>; KlatzkowJeff<JeffKlatzkow@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Teresa, Eric will follow up with Tim Hancock. 1441//16464-Gielo Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 9:58 AM To: AshtonHeidi Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Will the ad need to be changed?The proof was already approved,so I will need to know as soon as possible if it does. Thanks From:Ashton, Heidi Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 9:57 AM To:JohnsonEric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Cc:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) From your email, it sounds like the correct number is 8.72. Please run by the applicant before changing. The 10 acres likely came from the application. 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Ashton, Heidi Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:25 AM To: JohnsonEric; Hancock, Tim Cc: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Eric, I just pulled the file. The number is 8.72 acres. Please revise the title accordingly. %I /.fls%toa-CieEo Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 From: JohnsonEric Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:10 AM To: Hancock, Tim Cc: AshtonHeidi; Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Tim, Is it 10 acres or 8.72 acres? Please advise. Thanks! Eric Johnson Principal Planner From:AshtonHeidi Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 9:59 AM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Cc:JohnsonEric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net>; KlatzkowJeff<JeffKlatzkow@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Teresa, Eric will follow up with Tim Hancock. ffeia',4%or-('d Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:44 AM To: Hancock, Tim Cc: Ashton, Heidi;Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Thanks, Tim. Eric Johnson Principal Planner From: Hancock,Tim [mailto:Tim.Hancock@stantec.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:42 AM To:JohnsonEric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) It is 8.72 acres Tim Hancock, AICP Senior Associate Stantec 3200 Bailey Lane,Suite 200 Naples FL 34105 Phone: (239) 649-4040 x 6413 Fax:239-643-5716 Tim.Hancock@stantec.com Stantec -reirmt, zmu The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied,modified,retransmitted,or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization.If you are not the intended recipient,please delete all copies and notify us immediately. Cti Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: JohnsonEric [mailto:EricJohnson©colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:10 AM To: Hancock, Tim Cc: AshtonHeidi; Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Tim, Is it 10 acres or 8.72 acres? Please advise. Thanks! Eric Johnson Principal Planner From:AshtonHeidi Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 9:59 AM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Cc:JohnsonEric<Ericlohnson@colliergov.net>; KlatzkowJeff<JeffKlatzkow@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Teresa L. Cannon Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 11:16 AM To: 'JohnsonEric' Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) If the ad needs to be corrected, please email me what needs to be changed. From:JohnsonEric [mailto:EricJohnson@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:44 AM To: Hancock,Tim <Tim.Hancock@stantec.com> Cc:Ashton, Heidi<HeidiAshton@colliergov.net>;Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Thanks, Tim. Eric Johnson Principal Planner From: Hancock,Tim [mailto:Tim.Hancock@stantec.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:42 AM To:JohnsonEric<Ericlohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) It is 8.72 acres Senior Associate Stantec 3200 Bailey Lane,Suite 200 Naples FL 34105 Phone: (239) 649-4040 x 6413 Fax: 239-643-5716 Tim.Hancock@stantec.com Stantec Qrotin 60 years of community,creativity,and client rotor, _,. The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied,modified,retransmitted,or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization.If you are not the intended recipient,please delete all copies and notify us immediately. ICt Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: JohnsonEric [mailto:EricJohnson@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:10 AM To: Hancock, Tim Cc: AshtonHeidi; Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Tim, Is it 10 acres or 8.72 acres? Please advise. Thanks! Eric Johnson Teresa L. Cannon From: JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 1:12 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Cc: Melissa Eger;Ashton, Heidi Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project known as the Onyx RPUD to allow development of up to 48 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16, Township 50 South,Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 8.721-0±acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 06-53 and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20140000890] Eric Johnson Principal Planner From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 11:16 AM To:JohnsonEric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) If the ad needs to be corrected, please email me what needs to be changed. From:JohnsonEric [mailto:EricJohnson@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:44 AM To: Hancock,Tim <Tim.Hancock@stantec.com> Cc:Ashton, Heidi<HeidiAshton@colliergov.net>;Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Thanks, Tim. Eric Johnson Principal Planner From: Hancock,Tim [mailto:Tim.Hancock@stantec.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:42 AM To:JohnsonEric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) It is 8.72 acres Tim Hancock, AICD 1 Teresa L. Cannon To: Gori,Ivonne Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 Attachments: PUDZ-PL20140000890 (CCPC 6-2-16).doc Hi Ivonne, I sent an approval for this proof yesterday after the County Attorney reviewed it unfortunately the Planner found an error. Can it be revised, it's a small correction I have attached the ad again with the highlighted correction, instead of 10+/-acres it should read 8.72+/-acres.Thanks for your help. From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent:Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:51 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: Proof 1077182 Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist 1iI}1I!'alilti}; 1k'111:; I • WAY NNETWORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon To: JohnsonEric Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) I sent the revision to NDN and will the revised proof once I receive it. From:Johnson Eric [mailto:EricJohnson@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 1:12 PM To:Teresa L.Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Cc: Melissa Eger<meger@phasev.com>; Ashton, Heidi <HeidiAshton@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project known as the Onyx RPUD to allow development of up to 48 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16, Township 50 South,Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 8.72 4-0±acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 06-53 and by providing an effective date. IPUDZ-PL2014000089011 Eric Johnson Principal Planner From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 11:16 AM To:Johnson Eric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) If the ad needs to be corrected, please email me what needs to be changed. From:JohnsonEric [mailto:EricJohnson@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:44 AM To: Hancock,Tim<Tim.Hancock@stantec.com> Cc:Ashton, Heidi<HeidiAshton@colliergov.net>;Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 (Onyx) Thanks, Tim. Eric Johnson Principal Planner From: Hancock,Tim [mailto:Tim.Hancock@stantec.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:42 AM 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Gori,Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 3:06 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 Got it. A revised proof will follow. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist ^tiztplc:i+lttilrt lettt 5 I • K Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 2:26 PM To: Gori, Ivonne<ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: RE: Proof 1077182 Hi Ivonne, I sent an approval for this proof yesterday after the County Attorney reviewed it unfortunately the Planner found an error. Can it be revised, it's a small correction I have attached the ad again with the highlighted correction, instead of 10+/-acres it should read 8.72+/-acres.Thanks for your help. From:Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:51 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: Proof 1077182 Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist 1a0 1#ailii.ettti I •NETWORK AIN TODAY Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Gori,Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:36 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Attachments: N D N B1077182.pdf Please find it attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist lei lr.,Daitu Sews I s' Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com • 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE(S) Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, June 2nd, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district for a project known as the Onyx RPUD to allow development of up to 48 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16,Township 50 South, Range 26 East,Collier County, Florida,consisting of 8.72±acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 06-53 and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20140000890] DAVIS BLVD. (S.R.84) NAPLES HERITAGE FREESTATE COOK NAPLES GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PROPERTY HERITAGE 1 TAORMINA GOLF SEACREST RESERVE AND UPPER FALLING ¢�¢ COUNTRY NAPLES NATIONAL AND 8 WATERS CLUB GOLF CLUB LOWER COPE SCHOOL 1 co; Teresa L. Cannon To: Neet,Virginia;JohnsonEric (EricJohnson@colliergov.net) Subject: FW: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Attachments: N D N B1077182.pdf Please review revised proof From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:36 PM To:Teresa L.Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Please find it attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist Nitptc iii[1i NOUS I 41,USA NETWORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori(anaplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:48 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Cc: Neet, Virginia Subject: FW: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Attachments: N DN B 1077182.pdf Looks good! Thank you. Eric Johnson Principal Planner From:Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:38 PM To: NeetVirginia<VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>;JohnsonEric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: FW: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Please review revised proof From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:36 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Please find it attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist ?ap1r.`DAB lcttt er"TODAYNETWORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori @naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Neet, Virginia Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:55 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: FW: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Attachments: N DN B1077182.pdf From: AshtonHeidi Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:44 PM To: NeetVirginia Cc: CrotteauKathynell Subject: FW: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Approved. Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 From: NeetVirginia Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:41 PM To: AshtonHeidi; CrotteauKathynell Subject: FW: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Heidi: For your re-approval. Dinny From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.CannonCa�collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:38 PM • To: NeetVirginia; JohnsonEric Subject: FW: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Please review revised proof From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:36 PM To:Teresa L.Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED PROOF 1077182 1 Teresa L. Cannon To: Gori, Ivonne Subject: RE: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Looks good,ok to run! Thank you From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:36 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Please find it attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist :Sapirs atilt;News I USA TODAY NIETWORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon To: Gori,Ivonne Subject: RE: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Hi Ivonne, This has the wrong run date on the proof, it is to run May 13, 2016, not the 12th. Can you send a revised proof.Thanks From:Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:36 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Please find it attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist Naplr •.blit Ni 1ua ( uspartwommoar Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Minutes and Records To: Rodriguez,Wanda Subject: RE: REVISED PROOF 1077182 I notified NDN that the run date is incorrect, I will forward the revised proof when it is sent. From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 9:58 AM To: Minutes and Records<MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com>; Teresa L. Cannon <Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Cc:Ashton, Heidi<HeidiAshton@colliergov.net>; Neet,Virginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>;JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: re: REVISED PROOF 1077182 The attached proof has the date of May 12 in the bottom right corner. This ad should actually run on Friday, May 13th. Please confirm the run date of this ad. Thank you, Wanda Rodriguez, ACP Advanced Certified Paralegal- Office of the County Attorney (239)252-8400 From: AshtonHeidi Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 9:43 AM To: RodriguezWanda Subject: FW: REVISED PROOF 1077182 #eiar'fid tai-efelo Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 From: AshtonHeidi Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:45 PM To: NeetVirginia Cc: CrotteauKathynell Subject: FW: REVISED PROOF 1077182 Approved. #eiar,4%Ctor-Ce10 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Gori,Ivonne <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:04 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: REVISED 1077182 Attachments: N D N B1077182.pdf Please see revised proof attached. Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist NitPirsDail!!°,tills I •u Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE(S) Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, June 2nd, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district for a project known as the Onyx RPUD to allow development of up to 48 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16,Township 50 South, Range 26 East,Collier County, Florida,consisting of 8.72±acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 06-53 and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20140000890] DAVIS BLVD. (S.R.84) I NAPLES HERITAGE FREE ATE COOK NAPLES GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PROPERTY HERITAGE \ I TAORMINA GOLF RESERVE AND SEACRESTFALLING 1 COUNTRY NAPLES NATIONAL UPPER AND $ WATERSLOWERn Q O CLUB GOLF CLUB COPE SCHOOL r� ` Q 9 1 0 RESERVE 7 I - _IL_ i O]J 4O s I-O Z CO < HOMES OF ISLANDIA cO SHADOW— LASIP CONSERVATION AREA YOUTH O HAVEN N WATERFORD WOO PROJECT RIVIERA ESTATES ONY zLOCATION W T TES m 17 . — j ILJ�J ROYAL WOODS 16 a) m ZG&C CLUB HUNTINGTON '�� 15 Q WOODS NAPLES LAKES U w WIND— U / MANDALAY SHADOW— COUNTRY CLUB SONG (C.R.864) WOOD RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite#401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,June 2nd,2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman No.1077182 May 13.2016 Teresa L. Cannon To: RodriguezWanda (WandaRodriguez@colliergov.net) Subject: FW: REVISED 1077182 Attachments: N D N B1077182.pdf Please review, Date corrected From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:04 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED 1077182 Please see revised proof attached. Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist it 1�1`_itktit (1t'I1i i I * ODAY `PIETWORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Rodriguez,Wanda Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 1:39 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Cc: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: REVISED 1077182 Attachments: N D N B1077182.pdf Looks good now, thanks! Wanda Rodriguez, ACP Advanced Certified ParaCegaC Office of the County Attorney (239)252-8400 From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:11 PM To: RodriguezWanda Subject: FW: REVISED 1077182 Please review, Date corrected From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:04 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED 1077182 Please see revised proof attached. Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist 1p t.:i1 iiLiJ:Sem I •w RKY Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Teresa L. Cannon To: Gori,Ivonne Subject: RE: REVISED 1077182 Looks good, ok to run.Thanks From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:04 PM To:Teresa L. Cannon<Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED 1077182 Please see revised proof attached. Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist NETWORK Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 ?i'apLri Bat ?crwEi NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV 1077182 NOTICE 45-161942 Pub Dates May 13,2016 c (Sign ure of affiant) ••"''� IVONNE GORI Sworn to and subscribed before me 1 ••''�ji`�'`�:'•- Notary Public-State of Florld� This May 24, 16 �� ": • I Commission FF 900e70 I ' s;= My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 O''7 • ( ' `ie Basked through National Notary Assn. (Signatur of affiant) ' C 14A D Friday,May13,2016 D NAPLES DAILY NEWS E IZ O PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE > NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING d NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE(S) CI Notice is hereby gven Met a public hearing will be Yield by the Corder County Planning Commission at 9:00 NOticeisherebygren that a public hearingwll be held bytheCollierCounry Planning Cormlisaon AM..on TM1UM Jur2rd,2018,in the Board of coon Commissioners Meed at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 2nd,2010.in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting 01 ae. to ng Roam,Thpa Floor.Cotler Room,Third Floor,Collar Government Center,3299 East Tamiamn Trail,Naples FL,to consider Government Center,3299June East 016,in tmi Trail,Naples FL,to Cmmisconsider An Ordinance of the Board of CountyCommiseonane of Collis County.Florida amending Ordinance 20.2014- An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida amending . An 34,the RMC-Enclave Residential Planned Unit Development,and amending Ordinance No.2004-01,the Cell'e1 Ordinance No.2004-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which C County Lend Development Code,by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by charging the established the COmpfehenuv zoning regulations for theunincorporated area of Cotner Cou et boning dasattication of an additional 12.17s acres of lend zoned Community Facility Planned Unit Development nty,Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map orrrnap8 by changing the zoning //�a (CFPUD)known as the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of Naples CFPUD to the Residential Planned Unit classification of the herein described real property from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district ly Development(RPUD)zoning district known as the RMC-Enclave RPUD,by adding Oe residentialdwelling unite toe Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district for a project known as the fore total of 162 maiden.dwelling unitsor by adding 150goup housing units for a total of 500 group housing Onyx RPUD to allow development of up to 48 single fainly and/or multi-family dwetling units a) unite;by amending the master plan;by repealing Ordinance No.11-115 the Grace Romanian Baptist Church of on properly located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately one-half mile Naples CFPUD;and by providing an effective date.The subject properly is located.Menorthweami t quadrant of north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16,Township 50 South,Range 26 East,Collar • Learning lane end Livingston Road,a Section 13,Toship 49 South,Range 25 E..Collier County.Florida County,Florida,consisting of 832e sores;providing for repeal of Ordinance No.06-53 and by .N consisting of 4o.Sce acres.[PUD2-PL2m50OD18t3) providing an effective date.(PUDZ-PL2014000089D1 DAVISc BLVD.I (5.0.8a)Ah NAPLES HERITAGE wC NAPLL5 GOLF ANO CWNIRY CLUB Lmr HERITAGE C Q W Q [ 1 f t am CIXF °- U & MCA) S0' COUN1Ry NATIONAL �� JI RESERtc xEs. N�`"a a wi, �� 9 sue NAPLES clue E r O MEprERRA o 12 LOO (0m) 7 6 ret soiaa A t W 10 I ° a a z E�� n . r s� U z %BO,EaIA ROWS OF r3UNNA VETERANS MEMORIAL BUM7 F _ r Oe,Mt3eLAMP 0ONSERVATON AREA m eCOLoo IOCATION —g I Ya I . WATERFORD ill PROJECT EMITSLi ' ,2z NOON 00. FY&• LOCATION 0 CHURCH „ IES 1 U N ROYALAur. 13 ^ µp $E 17 z ROYAL MirS 16 15 �'ri — IoRII 18 p nU y",�ppN4Y0N yNAPN uNEs o e Lf tg Mt r iRT CWg ,i-:, MARSILFA wLLAS (MADEIRA 9 SONG (C.R.861) /n�` ^^ RATREISNANE WIMMOCK RD. I 1 'I N CL CC O (n CL interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE U Pll interested parties are invited to appear and be hard.Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made WI be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor,Collor o available for inspection at int 0060,County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor.Collier County Government Center, County Government Center,3299 East T laml Trail,Suite 0401,Naples,FL,one week prior •.,= V) 3299 East Taroen,Trail,State 6401,Naples,FL,one week prior to Me scheduled hearing.Written comments to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning • 0) o N must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Salon,prior to Thursday,June and,2016. Services Section,prior t0 Thursday,June 2nd,2010. Q < (I) 0 h e person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collar County Planning Commission If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect etch respect to any matter Considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of o any matter considered et such meeting or hearing,he win need a record of that proceeding,are lar such that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the proceedings Is made,which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal ceremony and evidence upon which the appeal's to be based. Is to be based. X you area person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate you are entitled,at no coal 10 you,to the provision of tartan assistance.Please contact Me Collier County In this proceeding,yous entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Facilities Meragennem Division.located at 3335-Rimier.Trail East,Suite slot,Naples.FL 34112-6366,yogi Please contact the CollierCounty Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Ta iami 252-8380.at least two days mid to the meeting.Assisted beetling devices for the haling impaired are Trail East,Suite 2101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the C available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. meeting,Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County r Commissioners Office. 14, Collier County Planning Commission CV Mark Suain,Chairman Collier County Planting Commission N Mark Strom,Chairman CO CO x No.1076944 11ey13 2016 11.1077182 May 13 2016 't g g LAOBOY YOUR CHOICEo▪ z z _-,.. LUCKY "`` LEATHER a) RECLINERS L LUCKY 13 �� ""' WHILE SUPPLIES LAST! 0 Z x110 now VVV CL E o 3 DAYS ONLY! MAY 13TH-15TH COLEMAN ROCKER RECLINER only each y L Z 0 C) Turn friday the 13th into the luckiest time of the year! now$389 originally < C CO 0 only VV�r/V 5499 ASTOR RECLINER LEATHER a �0 originally - -, EXTRA LUCKY a1399 HOT BUY RECLINER WHILE SUPPLIES LAST! 8511 ' ~ 1° STOREWIDE.. --- - Plus an extra r. 'SULLIVAN LEATHER O „ RECLINER originally 11599 M OFF GAVIN LEATHER RECLINER $ � E11 a nowRQ7 (((" 12 MONTH SPECIAL FINANCING' only �V/or 9nally 4 CD 'on purchases of 5500 or more with your La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries Card made betuveenFree in-home design Expedited delivery igl 4 t May 13-15.2016.12 equal monthly payments required.See below for details. schemmyaurfree desgnr2smnanomodsv ill on in-stock items • tZai N =gj L Ag,_10B O Y ..... Si 111111 ill MO ; HOME FURNISHINGS & DECOR m gi . 'Valid on items, items only.Offers may not be combined,end Savings exclude NAPLES•3770 TAMIAMI TRAIL N•239-213-4276 advertised nems,hot buys,unadvertised clearance soecrale,special ottersam orders Cr. dor1N1rchases,delivery and sales tax.Savings ma not be based on actual �,� FORT MYERS•4515 S CLEVELAND AVE•239-275-9566 salesPmeuct snowy is representative of stock a selection,stye ane colc ra Pinny by ` , score.Quantities may be limited.Every,precaution is taken h produce accurate details, j�{ W W W.la-z-boy.eom/westflorida errors m ynce and/or offers may occur In pont.We,reserve me lingght to coned any such Mon•Fri 9:30am-7 Sat l oam-7 errors. Financing subject to credit approval;minimum monthly payments required; 1 pm pm•Sun 12pm-Spm other financing options are available. See store representative for more details. t( �i CCD co m D B CQ -< r- CD cD c 0 coDi = a, O � 03 c .< 0 = 1~ fZ. c D 0 z CO 0) CD a D m r- 171 < ,__,33 5' 0 cc m M � o n z a,- m zmz cc, Z O mz D zm cn0 —1 P 0 r m z p _ \ .k 0 CD 1'7 0O Z XG,, 1-''''0 > m R1 c w 1 r 0 IT1 -I > , • O omo C 03on - E Ilik r W � O � � O nm - DMZ 'Ill ^ Z z 0 C D r j , �.;. (v o _ C -i 00 a '"� O -n firl al cnmo �0 CD N , t Q � Co 00 MO 03 mm 0=13333ZD33cn _ e �o a .- mZ (D .:-.. a 0 77 � O zzN -1 cc,) . -� � o �' c. m Om O� D m b� r 0315 OZ5 > —73 O mW Zoog n -n Or- , mOmN Ili -I On (nonce 2 -1 � C � o Do IT1 O � ZFri U OO D *z O 70n o D --l0m O to W Do m -- _� i Cn o Mi] D 173 i- m 0 cn 0 o - D m m m - , "L-,...,.......4 -1 < z cn O Q) mO fn - � C) _ o O m = jam► r- m m Z DJ > Ok►` 1 Dm0 z r-- rr , Olik r C < � Di m � �. C75 C') r m �\ 0 D n XI -1O Oz --1 O - mz 19/ •c+--)J 9\"-t' ) W Z- 1 CEJ a a Q W I— I- o 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 - z Z O I,- L0 M O N CO N 00 O N p O U I— O 4 M M O V 4 O o U ° m 12 O W N o_ N O 2' w w W M O O M V N co •,:rJ O N 2I O N O �' O ,— N O r O O O I W Z d 0 z LU Z " U) ¢ I— WCC m w rn LU Q ( 3 J U UJ m U) U cp U OW Z Q W z g 0 b F- U) O M D > W U g U (n1Z0 J Z J v Z cn li.i U) v Q W Q = I— Q O o Un a Q Wz U Z U Q co _' N i— >_ w 0 . J CC Q W CC W LLi W W Z O D. — — > _ I— $ V c, O Z < Q < co O U Z O Z Q Z to wI to U F— w W W CO O J Z Z d a J W Z O N Q J UJ o o Z N Q WQ fx Q W Q W Q N p J p LL Win OQO � U 2 U-1.... H Z U I— W I— W O i a U U CO Q Z } LI] O Z_ Z (n Z (n x -- x O Z O `s WQ Z W W W �_ Cl. Z W O W O J U W U J r' J I— CC _O Z H Z cC d CC 0_ m Q co Q Q O O W > Z W W Q N LY 0 Q < CLO W O Q O) W O Z_ U CO �J > fn W W D 2 U r �! U O W o O Q I' W 2 W a < O J U- x Z ¢ I— a U a U a �, ,� a r` 3 (MOM.0E)OA19 13SNfS A8VONfO8 103road rm I T 1 w V, I z.--(d)3AM3S3Md I c 1 0 Lo UIco > I in co -p I ^ U O Ci_ J `O LU CC< I ZS tn I J Q < N w Z I Z I `° co I wL.0< I (n w 0 <W W /t \ c.N W I \ _<<< I V / C ce L O M d 1 J 2 W J I Q O C a P 6.- m i 1 wz_ ` >IJJ 1 v a 1 y . 1 a z re 1Ce a I I X / I 0 4 , 1� > cK I M3d�na >10V 31.3S o J 7—.0.,3dA1 < .OL 1 a L i .01 z I m o� U 3 co NOVa13S rn W a z 1 OZ z 1 cc ,4/ ) w \\ Ili _ _ / / I W re I \ : : / r 1 > I ® bo / a 0 1611) < aOJa I limaLu 1 2a WW LL tea"" W O_ U J a /1: a b W� w o< \ ) RI O niaLL umIm wNI it ++} zW o J oz N— lir a — — I ~Q w �� )I�VM301S'X3 I (1115 I m w-. ZC�J 1 1 } Q V• 9L NOI103S 1 LI N01103S - --- V(iJfOa 103robd OMVA31909 VMV8MV8 V1NVS PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE(S) Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,June 2nd, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County,Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Residential RMF-6 zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)zoning district for a project known as the Onyx RPUD to allow development of up to 48 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately one-half mile north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road in Section 16,Township 50 South,Range 26 East,Collier County, Florida,consisting of 8.72±acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 06-53 and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20140000890] - DAVIS BLVD. (S.R.84) I NAPLES HERITAGE FREESTATE COOK NAPLES GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PROPERTY HERITAGE 1 TAORMINA GOLF RESERVE AND SEACREST FALLING ¢1 COUNTRY NAPLES NATIONAL UPPER ) AND WATERS Q 0CLUB GOLF CLUB LOWER COPE SCHOOL Q; 9 10 RESERVE _ a QO - z O e Z CO - < HOMES OF ISLANDIA SHADOW- LASIP CONSERVATION AREA 0_ UTH OHAVEN I \ESTATE ORD WOO PROJECT 0 RIVIERA I NY z LOCATION W TES m 17 . O ROYAL WOODS 16 m 7 z G&C CLUB HUNTINGTON 15CL �1} 0 WOODS NAPLES LAKESU CL U / MANDALAY SHADOW- WIND- WOOD/ COUNTRY CLUB p (C.R.864) SONG 0 RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD. 1 _ All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite #401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,June 2nd,2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman No.1077182May 13,2016 Patricia L. Morgan From: JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Sent: Friday,July 01, 2016 1:52 PM To: Patricia L. Morgan Cc: Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael Subject: FW:Attached Image Attachments: 2053_001.pdf; CCPC Backup Documentation from 06/02/2016 Item #9B and #9C Hi, Trish. The proposed RPUD known as"Onyx"was presented to the CCPC on June 2. It was item 9C on the agenda. During the course of the meeting,the agent,Mr. Tim Hancock, used the visualizer and showed many exhibits, most of which were included in each Commissioner's packet or given to the court reporter. However, some did not make it to the court reporter. I have been in contact with Tim to try to get everything that he presented. Tim recently sent me the attached PDF containing four(4)pages. I believe two(2)of the four were presented at the hearing but were neither included in the packets nor given to the court reporter. The other two(2)may simply be duplicates, which is fine. Either way, I wanted you to have Tim's PDF, duplicates and all. Better to be safe than sorry. I intend to combine your PDF with Tim's PDF and give it to the BCC when they review the petition on September 13. Thanks! Eric Johnson Principal Planner From: Hancock,Tim [mailto:Tim.Hancock@stantec.com] Sent: Friday,July 01, 2016 11:31 AM To:JohnsonEric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Cc: Philpott,Joshua <Josh.Philpott@stantec.com> Subject: FW: Attached Image Eric, Per our conversation, attached are .pdf's of the exhibits shown on the visualizer that may not have been included in the CCPC packet. Please let me know if you need anything else and have a great vacation! Tim Hancock, AICP Senior Associate Stantec 3200 Bailey Lane,Suite 200 Naples FL 34105 Phone: (239) 649-4040 x 6413 Fax:239-643-5716 Tim.Hancock@stantec.com 5 Stantec Celebrating 60 years of community,creativity,and client relationships. The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied,modified,retransmitted,or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization.If you are not the intended recipient,please delete all copies and notify us immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Canon©stantec.com [mailto:Canon@istantec.com] Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 12:42 PM 1 To: HancocTim Subject: Attached Image Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.nyou uonot want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 4i,i) 0 rla /A _ ':-- m •n m x x x rn 9 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD o z m m m 3 3 D_ PROJECT BOUNDARY > m z I m -' to x m I xi mO z —I O m '4` 1 m r Z > ri I X rn z z Z 1 _ _ �.-- C IZ c 1 m> I� I m C I m m 1 A 1 Z. m Q p m �+- I D j ( 2-D1 O z _ m R D Z G y i v "_- _yF K F.? z Q Dm I \ - - _ CZ rn a, C ---F 1Z > I \`•,.E 1 IL 13 m A. rn j0 y N (7) 70 > 1 � >Aii m - m Z 1 5 m-+ y --Ii w 0 m 3 D l� ( co 'i .. z f m z N i Z 0 F [T i s rn - I ` _w---- I C > • XT (/) x o I m J m . 0 0 OO I ---PRESERVE(P) -' '? m z 1 L 1 I- 2 2 ^ D D __ SUNSET-EOULEVARD(30'ROW) l / r' F.s Z _< N i -o m 0 ' m m w O -i OND -n rn O0 Zm0 0 z m m (; � p G)Z � D_ • r- F A D r Z fi g. 2 m 3 71 m m O m v G 'T N g O co m -0 4R l . Ms % _AL(V*1 ', . 1 ,1 I A tt t • - ,- , jtit oF i w s - ti in 'PI.' aki S 4 t. 11 ' ' '- ,',.';.,;'••..''''".- `i=1- ' .,.., - r.- •-7 ,: '.••' , M ' '' '' -.'•- •' oi.;..,' - -..1("..•-...P14.4.'":''':11'' -.:.- �, fi +oJEo � �, o- . • r r ... ,, , '5, ,117: .j• ,4 .Foiii.A ••\'• i — 1E151 ' . : ,c.,: - it, ,,,- pi,t.-). )41 . • 1 . _..., . . t „t„, i • 4, log s ., ,- .; ,t .....„-; , 4. ...„ _. ,... ... , ., , ...... lc, 4„,. . . .. . . ... 31. . . , ...., .... • ... _ . , .... . _ .. _ ... • . „.. , „., ,,,, „ ,,,J1s.,,,, 4 .., ' .4 . il '° +'�' d3�u fis r,.LIjI,.�I•, .4 ,� .... „.elle~ ,i_h `f 5 r . r�' 1011111� y , r • �',, R fi` C. A,. ,� -. R� 4 -�•7-• �" ., +t• Vii. ,: 1: ' 4 a ^ 1 . lr •i .;.,..1.. J r LL i y Icito. Illy mik i "6. .. - f • o i d 1 ..:• _ a�#i iLS7KIc A'. ,i. Sl. �._.'rn° ! !, 1R,R` t.i _MOW1011.1r *1 'r.. NOW 7 . � � ti � • w k, ......t....r.J ,9sv � , .. ,. ... . � � ' e (' ,, I N ', cam', 'rt +� Iy , :. 1 • v..*, ,, :„ ..,--Iiiiill ! ‘,.- •• 1; 14,. . . :\.',:,' ' '.., ' , 0 ..... . � Parcel Boundaries _ ONYX RPUD ( J4 Stantec -, CURRENT AERIAL-E%HABIT �.1� :)u�nu:wl.t Stantec PUDA-PL20140000890 Onyx RUPD June 1, 2016 Updated and Revised Commitments Based on input received from various sources, including a meeting with the East Naples Civic Association Board of Directors on May 4th and the second Neighborhood Information Meeting with residents on Thursday, May 12th, the petitioner offers the following as commitments to be added to the Residential Planned Unit Development Document: 1.The first floor of each unit will utilize primarily concrete block construction. 2.The minimum unit size shall be 1,400 square feet. 3. Asphalt shingles shall be prohibited as a roofing material. 4.The community may be gated, subject to changes to the MCP allowing for the movement of the amenity center as shown on the updated MCP (attached). 5. To ensure adequate visual screening after clearing and removal of exotics from the preserve, the developer shall either: a. Construct a 6' privacy wall along the east and southern property lines, adjacent to the preserve, or; b.Supplemental plantings of wax myrtle, buttonwood, green buttonwood, sable palms, and/or live oaks will be utilized to achieve 80%opacity at 8 feet in height within one year of planting. 6. The developer shall include a disclosure in the sales materials that there are agriculturally zoned properties with farm animals in proximity to the project which may make noise audible to homeowners in the project. 7.Street lighting for the project will utilize flat panel or similar fixtures and cut off shields where appropriate to avoid light spill onto adjacent properties and to reduce light pollution SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARDPROJECT BOUNDARY SECTION 17 1 m SECTION 16 1 1 1 EX.SIDEWALK IT4• mom% ( —I- — — _ _ _ _ \ea, mz ice, i 1 ,ii , . ---, x co i 1 A 21O DA, !N i I / O�� I rTil IA rt D `(1) v 1 r �--lr i O �_ o i 1 ` i A m y i 1 i 7 �. 4 O 1 A 20' I ` m 33 y 1 I SETA cIc_, N 0 OJ 1 A= ,a J z I 7 r 1 TYPE ro- A1 SETErACK_.. BUFFER z 1 I X I ( 1 v I /ZJ ! I Ai 1 D V ! D w O 1 x i M �i 1 in i y I o 1 m o I- 9. I I v m Z c I \F)ii I O Q m� -• Et, Z N I imp I m 3 T rn D i 1 t o c I \------- I o a r I -- — < a (� 1 ~ 1 ro ' 2 J `f. 1 �s I .—PRESERVE(P)--'7 1 r X 1 1 a -. PROJECT BOUNDARY — SUNSET BLVD(30'ROW) g 0 - Cl P' > - -.I V C -0 f) D ( ! D -1 -0 > ,) Z N m C7 — XI -4 In 70 C Xl C I O > v m DO 6 n < � C� � �i <° W O O iD O ai D m m Z * i ,Lri oOI- n m o . -07:1 -0m1 -,z m m - m Z D m O z p � x x m to z cn z Z O m < , z D oD (Dn 0 < O m -1 m 7 -I mmz ax * m r- PN010 m r 0 Z Z 1 O< mm m -1 = m m r- �1I P. z Z Z (mm -n m m m C DH O n "' go NA DCID0 •• z m m D co Z m Z cDi m n %p m < m T D '� v fi a = z m XI D ' C i 0 -i 0 cn z m C/) zm mZ -+ D CD 3 C Z m D ao o o - 7' o N " o X K Z r N N3 V N -` -` co 0) W D > m Q m -< i -u am -n A :1'• N rn 0' w a o -I no o 0 cg N o \ o 0 o O z o c` c\ o z 0 o0oDDm r 0 I 1 m CCP& I4em 4d JohnsonEric irrc Jrhhsrr., From: StrainMark Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:22 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: PL2015...1613 June 2 2016 meeting Please distribute as typical Ma--k/ 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a pubLic records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: B Prins [mailto:bnprins@yahoo.com] Sent:Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:57 PM To: StrainMark Subject: PL2015...1613 June 2 2016 meeting Hello Mr. Strain; Thank you for taking the time to read my email. I would like to voice my concerns regarding the June 2 meeting for the Collier County Planning Commission for PL2015-1613 RMC- Enclave. I believe that is the correct identifier. I am a resident of Camden Lakes, located at Livingston and Learning Lane in North Naples. One of the reasons we moved into this neighborhood is because it is surrounded by other single family home developments. We understood that there was the possibility of a church being built on this land, but now the developer is proposing a 500 unit senior living facility, which would be five or six stories tall. There is a big difference between a church steeple and what is basically a high rise apartment building. This area is populated by single family homes, a high rise building would not be compatible with the surrounding homes and a family environment. Please feel free to contact me to discuss. Thank you for your attention to my concerns. Thank you Nanette Prins Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 JohnsonEric From: Mike Omann <mikeom@ATS-INC.com> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:55 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Camden Lakes Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes,which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2,2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Mike Omann 320-217-4579 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate,distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. i JohnsonEric From: Cesar Taveras <ctaveras72@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:42 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Camden Lakes Dear Commissioner Strain: I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. Cesar Taveras i JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 11:22 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Please distribute as typical Mark/ 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: George King [mailto:george@grialed.com] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 10:47 AM To: StrainMark Subject: Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes,which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. George King 1 16293 Camden Lakes Circle Naples, FL 34110 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 4:19 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Opposed to Senior Housing Project Please distribute as typical • Mark., 239252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: M K[mailto:martikaren@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 3:56 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Opposed to Senior Housing Project Dear Mr.Strain, I am a resident of Camden Lakes and I am emailing you to voice my concern about the future Enclave Development on your agenda for the meeting on 6/2/2016. I am opposed to a Senior Group Housing Project and I hope you will vote against this project as well. I feel that single family homes would be the best use of the land and would keep a consistent feel and character to the surrounding area. The developer may alternatively request single family homes for the Enclave Development, and I feel this would be a welcomed addition to our neighborhood and keep homogeneity to the area. Thank you for taking the time to read this and for your careful consideration on this important vote. Karen Marti Excuse my typos! Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:06 AM To: JohnsonEric Attachments: Camden Lakes; Camden Lakes Please disburse as typical Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 10:35 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Request From Resident of Camden Lakes Please distribute as typical __. _ Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. Original Message From: Stephen A.Rogers [mailto:sarogers@intemed.com] Sent: Friday, May 27,2016 10:29 AM To: RomanCharlette Cc: ChrzanowskiStan; StrainMark; HomiakKaren; EbertDiane Subject: Request From Resident of Camden Lakes Dear Ms. Roman, We are residents of Camden Lakes emailing you to voice our concern about the Enclave Development proposal on your agenda for the June 2nd,2016 meeting. We are opposed to the Senior Group Housing Facility project and hope that you will align with our interests and will vote against this project. We feel that single family homes would be the best use of this land as it would keep a consistent feel and character to the surrounding communities. As an alternative, we believe that Enclave Development would be open to constructing single family homes on the site. We feel that this would be a welcome addition to our neighborhood and will keep homogeneity to the area. Thank you for taking the time to consider this request. Regards, Ellyn and Stephen Rogers 16329 Camden Lakes Circle Naples,FL 34110 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. t JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:06 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Opposition to Enclave Development Please disburse as typical Marks 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Klein, Charmaine [mailto:Charmaine.Klein@aciworldwide.com] Sent:Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:33 PM To: aolis@cohenaw.com; dianeebert@coliergov.net; wfassaad@hotmail.com; HomiakKaren; StrainMark; ChrzanowskiStan; RomanCharlette Subject: Opposition to Enclave Development Dear Commissioners: I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. The area is located on the corner of Livingston Road and School Access Road for North Naples Middle School. This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I recently moved to Naples for work and specifically chose this area because it was family oriented and offered my daughter an environment that was kid friendly and family friendly. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. Charmaine Klein Global Business Leader, Payment Strategy Consumer Payments Product Management 1 Telephone: 239-403-4593 charmaine.kfeinC 1aciworldwide.com ACI Worldwide,3520 Kraft Road,Suite 300,Naples,FL 34105 www.aciworldwide.com IV Ac UN PAYMIENTS ERSAL PUTS CUSTOMERS FIRST This email message and any attachments may contain confidential,proprietary or non-public information. The information is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this email,please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon this information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the author personally. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request.do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: June 2 meeting - please consider Please disburse as typical Ma-rk, 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, e-mail addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-mail address reLeased in response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: Jimmy crick[mailto:crickcovenant@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:51 PM To: StrainMark Subject: June 2 meeting - please consider Dear Commissioner Strain: I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. For His Glory, Samantha Crick For His Glory, Jimmy and Samantha i For His Glory, Jimmy and Samantha Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send .M electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: June 2 meeting: opposing senior living facility Please disburse as typical Mark/ 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, a-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released -in response to a public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Jimmy Crick[mailto:jpcsoccerl7@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:42 PM To: StrainMark Subject: June 2 meeting: opposing senior living facility Dear Commissioners, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. James P. Crick,Jr.,PT,DPT Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Learning Lane - Senior Living Facility • Please disburse as typical Mark, 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From:John S. Sarrett[mailto:jsarrett©sarrettlaw.com] Sent:Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:36 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Learning Lane-Senior Living Facility Dear Commissioner: My family and I reside in the Camden Lakes community,which is a wonderful community of single family homes.I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. My wife and I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area,and be a potential risk to along the students,including my children, at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I will remind the commissioner that the county does not provide buses for the children living in Camden Lakes,and the increased traffic a senior living facility would create could be an extreme danger for these young children walking to school. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2,2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. John S. Sarrett JOHN S. SARRETT,P.A. 999 Vanderbilt Beach Road Suite 200 Naples,FL 34108 Main: (239)325-3350 1 Direct: (239) 330-2359 Facsimile: (239)790-5063 Website: www.sarrettlaw.com Sent from my iPhone Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:05 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Camden Lakes Please disburse as typical Marl. 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Alex Chinea [mailto:achinea4@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:30 PM To: HomiakKaren; asolis@cohenlaw.com; EbertDiane; wfassaad@hotmail.com; StrainMark Subject: Camden Lakes Dear Commissioners, I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land. This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. Alex Chinea Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:04 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Sr housing Please disburse as typical - M arks 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address reLeased in response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: Scott Mcconnell [ma ilto:swmccon@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday, May 26, 2016 6:02 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Sr housing Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes,which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes.I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area,along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2,2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Sent from iPad Scott McConnell Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:04 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Opposition to Enclave Development Please disbui Tastypidal __,. Mark. 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address reLeased in response to a public records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From: CVRC[mailto:cvrc1226@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:57 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Opposition to Enclave Development Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes,which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. We are very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. We worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area,along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. We hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2,2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Best Wishes, Christy and Norman Ruiz-Castaneda i JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:19 AM To: JohnsonEric Attachments: Multi Senior Dwellings Proposed near Camden Lakes; Enclave Development; Enclave Developers Please distribute as typical Mark 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-maiL address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From: greg pryer<gulfcrest@centurylink.net> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 10:03 AM To: charlerreroman@colliergov.net; ChrzanowskiStan; StrainMark; wfassaad@hotmail.com; EbertDiane; asolis@cohenlaw.com; HomiakKaren Subject: Enclave Developers Dear Commissioner, When I was searching for a community in which to purchase my home, I was impressed with Camden Lakes as it contained only single family homes as did the surrounding communities. The zoning around us did not allow high rise housing so this was the perfect place to buy my home as it would remain low density. I don't think that a commercial senior group high rise housing project is the correct use of land surrounding our community. We are family neighborhoods and would like it to remain that way. I hope we can count on you to not approve this project. Thank you, Gregory W.Pryer 16202 Camden Lakes Cir. Naples, Fl. 34110 239-596-3499 1 JohnsonEric From: greg pryer <gulfcrest@centurylink.net> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 10:26 AM To: HomiakKaren Cc: asolis@cohenlaw.com; dianeebert@colliegov.net; wfassaad ; StrainMark; ChrzanowskiStan; RomanCharlette Subject: Enclave Development Eric J. Palm 16202 Camden Lakes Cir.,Naples,Fl. 34110 Dear Commissioner, I would like you to oppose the high rise senior housing project being proposed by Enclave Development. Our community, Camden Lakes, is comprised solely of single family homes as are our surrounding developments. The best use of this land would be to retain the low density single family development which I understand that the developer has proposed as an alternative use. We would very much appreciate your opposing the commercial high rise senior project in favor of the single family concept. Thank you, Eric J. Palm 1 JohnsonEric From: Jan Epperson <janpepp316@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 2:34 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Multi Senior Dwellings Proposed near Camden Lakes Dear Commissioner Strain, - I am writing to ask you NOT to allow the zoning to be changed so that these "Multi Dwelling Buildings" can be built near"Camden Lakes" on "Livingston." I live in Camden Lakes near my daughter and her husband and 3 children. These buildings would cause so much more traffic on "Livingston" and "Learning Lane." This is where my Grandchildren walk to school and ride their bikes. It is a safe and wonderful residential area now for many families to raise their children, I would hate to see this change. I don't understand why"Multi Dwelling Buildings"would be allowed to be build amongst many residential areas such as "Camden Lakes." I am in Seattle and will not be able to be at the meeting but will be hoping and praying that you do NOT allow this zoning to be changed and these buildings to be built. Thanks you for your time, Jan Epperson 16229 Camden Lakes Circle Naples, Fl. 34110 Mobile 425-478-9334 1 JohnsonEric From: RomanCharlette Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:26 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: BellowsRay Subject: RE: Open Space calculation Thanks Eric. I may want to clarify that on Thursday. Charlette From:JohnsonEric Sent:Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:17 PM To: RomanCharlette Cc: BellowsRay Subject: RE: Open Space calculation Commissioner Roman, The LDC defines as open space as"Areas that are not occupied by buildings,impervious parking areas,streets,driveways or loading areas and which may be equipped or developed with amenities designed to encourage the use and enjoyment of the space either privately or by the general public. Examples of open space include:areas of preserved indigenous native vegetation;areas replanted with vegetation after construction; lawns,landscaped areas and greenways;outdoor recreational facilities;and plazas,atriums,courtyards and other similar public spaces." With respect to your question, front yards can be considered open space if designed in compliance with the above. As far as what the applicant intends by"other open space areas,"I have to assume anything that qualifies as open space consistent with the above definition,excluding water management and buffer areas. Eric Johnson Principal Planner From: RomanCharlette Sent:Tuesday,May 31,2016 11:39 AM To:JohnsonEric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Cc: BellowsRay<RayBellows@colliergov.net> Subject:Open Space calculation Eric, How is total open space calculated for a project, i.e. what all is counted?Are front yards considered open space? Regarding RMC-Enclave, what are"other open space areas?" Thank you. Charlette 1 JohnsonEric From: Kraiza, Jonathan <jkraiza@massmutual.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 11:39 AM To: StrainMark Subject: 6/2 Agenda: Enclave Developers - opposition to Senior Group Housing Commissioner Strain, - I am emailing you to voice my concern about the future Enclave Development on your agenda for the meeting on June 2nd As a resident of Camden Lakes,the residential community adjacent to this land,we selected this location due to the great schools and fantastic family residential corridor that this portion of Livingston Road has become. A commercial business with apartment style/high rise buildings and workers on staff simply does not fit well in this area. This type of business could negatively impact everyone living in the surrounding area as well as the students of nearby Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I understand the developer is also considering single family homes for the Enclave Development,and I feel this is the best use of the land and would keep a consistent feel and character to the area. Thank you for your careful consideration on this important vote. Jonathan Kraiza This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary,privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the person(s)to whom it is addressed. Any use,copying,retention or disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or their designee,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. 1 JohnsonEric From: Dominic Polito <djpolito97@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 1:33 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Senior Group Housing Facility Dear Mark Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes, which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. My wife and I are retired and have put our savings into this property. We believe that our property values will decrease dramatically if this facility is built. We are hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Dominic and Joan Polito 16306 Winfield Lane Naples, FL 34110 Camden Lakes Residents JohnsonEric From: Joanna Ritchie <joannaritchie@bellsouth.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:30 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Development on Livingston Road Hi Commissioner Strain, . My family and I reside in Camden Lakes,which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2,2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Sincerely, James and Joanna Ritchie 16171 Cartwright Ln,Naples, FL 34110 239-443-8161 t JohnsonEric From: Nicole Marco <nicolemarco@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:46 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Re: Enclave Dear Commissioner Strain: -.- I am writing to you this evening to encourage you to oppose the Enclave developers possible Senior Group Living Community at the June 2nd meeting. I live in Camden Lakes which is the residential community adjacent to this land.This area is a wonderful family residential corridor with great schools and nearby shopping. I do not think that a commercial business with seniors living in a group community fits well into this area on Livingston Road. We have many family neighborhoods here and would like to see that continue. Thank you for your consideration. Nicole& Peter Marco 1 JohnsonEric From: Peter Marco <Pete.Marco@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:30 PM To: Strain Mark Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane From: Peter Marco Sent:Tuesday,May 31, 2016 3:23 PM To:Markstrain@colliergov.com Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane Mark, I am written in concern to the Enclave project across from Camden Lakes community on Livingston road. I am g a current resident in Camden Lakes, and my children will be attending North Naples Middle school over the next several years. I have great concerns about proposal to add a secondary access on learning lane. I believe the additional traffic will create risk to children that will be walking and biking to school. The increase in traffic will cause congestion at the intersection that will increase possibility of accidents. Since this access is only secondary and not essential, I ask that you reject the builder request to add the additional access on learning lane. Thank you! Peter Marco 1 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 1:30 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane Please distribute as typical Ma-Yk� 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-mail address reLeased in response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Peter Marco [mailto:Pete.Marco@outlook.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:30 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane From: Peter Marco Sent:Tuesday, May 31,2016 3:23 PM To: MarkstrainPcolliergov.com Subject: Re: Enclave secondary access on learning Lane Mark, I am written in concern to the Enclave project across from Camden Lakes community on Livingston road. I am a current resident in Camden Lakes, and my children will be attending North Naples Middle school over the next several years. I have great concerns about proposal to add a secondary access on learning lane. I believe the additional traffic will create risk to children that will be walking and biking to school. The increase in traffic will cause congestion at the intersection that will increase possibility of accidents. Since this access is only secondary and not essential, I ask that you reject the builder request to add the additional access on learning lane. Thank you! Peter Marco 1 JohnsonEric From: William Benavitz <rosemary.benavitz@icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:24 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Oppose Enclave Developers Dear Commissioner Strain, My family and I reside in Camden Lakes,which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides. I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2,2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Sincerely, Rosemary Benavitz Sent from my iPhone i JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 7:15 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: requesting your consideration of petition #PUDA-PL-2015-1613 Please distribute as typical - Mark. 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic maiL to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Tanya Bosco [mailto:tanya.bosco@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday,June 02, 2016 2:20 AM To: HomiakKaren; asolis@cohenlaw.com; EbertDiane; wtassaad@hotmail.com; StrainMark Subject: requesting your consideration of petition #PUDA-PL-2015-1613 Good morning,Ms Homiak,Mr Solis,Ms Ebert,Mr Assaad,Mr Strain,Mr Chrzanowski,and Ms Roman, I am writing to you all collectively as a member of the Camden Lakes subdivision,a wonderful community of single family homes in North Naples. I am also a concerned homeowner hoping to gamer your support on an issue that could have a lasting impact on the lives of my family and all those living here in Camden Lakes. I am highly opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility on the plot of land referenced in the subject line,located at the intersection of Learning Lane and Livingston Road. Not only would a multi-style/high rise building with its many workers and staff to support a senior living facility destroy the single family home experience of our community,but also this type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides and has the potential to destroy preserved land that was a major draw for us as residents. I am deeply concerned that this type of facility will detract from the appearance and value of our neighborhood, and more important,will pose a great risk to our community's students at both Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle Schools with increaded traffic and service vehicles,as well as a commercial vehicle increase. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held this morning and support single family homes instead while maintaining as much of the preserve as possible to maintain the environment and aesthetics. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. Best Regards, Tanya Bosco i 16345 Camden Lakes Circle Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request.do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. • 2 JohnsonEric From: StrainMark Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 1:29 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: FW: Enclsve Development Attachments: Enclave Strain.pdf Please distribute as typical Mairk/ 239.252.4446 Under FLorida Law, e-maiL addresses are pubLic records. If you do not want your e-maiL address reLeased in response to a pubLic records request, do not send eLectronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by teLephone or in writing. From:john fritzel [mailto:fritzelcj@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday,June 01, 2016 10:48 AM To: StrainMark Subject: Enclsve Development Mark, Please find our attached objection to the Enclave Development. We feel it would negatively impact our property values. It does not fit with the single family corridor on Livingston Road. There are several assisted or senior housing units at Livingston and Vanderbilt to meet the needs of seniors in the area. Respectfully, John and Charlene Fritzel 16112 Camden Lakes Circle Naples, Fla. 34110 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 /---) �J t rWe..f .. ��1LAtte d? L;7 �-- ` ?., r Dear Commissioner/V1`y'/ ' ,j � - My family and I reside in Camden Lakes,which is a wonderful community of single family homes. I am reaching out to you in hopes of gaining your support on a very important issue that could impact the lives of my family and those living here in Camden Lakes. I am very opposed to the Enclave Developers building a Senior Group Housing Facility. The proposed project calls for apartment style/high rise buildings with workers on staff. This type of dwelling does not fit with the family residential corridor that Livingston Road provides.I worry this type of facility would dramatically change the look and feel of the neighborhood. The high rise building and the number of workers and medical staff that may be needed could impact everyone living in the area, along with the students at Veterans Memorial Elementary and North Naples Middle School. I am hoping you will oppose the Senior Living Facility at the meeting held on June 2, 2016 and support single family homes instead. Thank you for your time and careful consideration. 22- i - ' ,v3` -r- /� l�l Lam_L' t i -///6 /�? � il-e-�2.^ cy.4-42. ......- 6-;/-1.-4:6,-c . //G= /2-74,4tiez,7.07 CCPC June 2, 2016 LDC Amendments 7 od1� COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS . �. 7TN11 To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: X Normal legal Advertisement 0 Other: (Display Adv.,location,etc.) Originating Dept/Div: Operations and Regulatory Management Person:Caroline Cilek,LDC Manager Date: Monday,May 9,2016 Petition No.(If none,give brief description): N/A Petitioner: (Name&Address): N/A Name&Address of any person(s)to be notified by Clerk's Office:(If more space is needed,attach separate sheet) See Above Hearing before BCC BZA Other:CCPC Requested Hearing date:Thursday,June 2,2016 Notice to run: Wednesday,May 18,2016 Notice to run not later than:Friday,May 20,2016 Newspaper(s)to be used: (Complete only if important): X Naples Daily News 0 Other X Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include Title of the Ordinance/Resolution(or just write in see attached document),legal description,common location&size): Please see attached legal ad. Please publish the following public notice in your edition on Wednesday,May 18, 2016. Please furnish proof of publication of each advertisement to the Collier County Growth Management Department, Division of Zoning and Land Development Review,2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104, Attention: Caroline Cilek Companion petition(s),if any&proposed hearing date: N/A Does Petition Fee include advertising cost?❑Yes ❑ No If Yes,what account should be charged for advertising costs: Department: Land Development Services,Zoning Review Section; Fund&Cost Center: 131-138909-634999;Purchase Order Number:4500163243; Account Number: 068779 P.O.#4500163243 Reviewed by: 7/ Division/A muustrator or Designee Date List Attachments: Legal Ad.Proposed Ordinance to be furnished closer to the hearing date. DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved,be sure that any necessary legal review,or request for same,is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: ❑ County Manager agenda file: to ❑Requesting Division ❑Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office,retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE O Y: &,/ !//'/(t:2 / Date of Public hearing 02/ -/ Date Advertised: S f May 9, 2016 Naples Daily News 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 ATTENTION: LEGAL ADVERTISING Please publish the following public notice in your edition on Wednesday, May 18, 2016. Please furnish proof of publication of each advertisement to the Collier County Growth Management Division, Department of Zoning and Land Development Review, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104, Attention: Jeremy Frantz. NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE Notice is hereby given that on Thursday,June 2, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Building "F," Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, the Collier County Planning Commission will consider amendments to the Collier County Land Development Code. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO MAKE COMPREHENSIVE CHANGES TO ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS, MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: CHAPTER TWO-ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES, INCLUDING SECTION 2.03.06 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS; CHAPTER FOUR - SITE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION 4.02.12 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE, SECTION 4.02.16 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA, SECTION 4.02.37 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE GOLDEN GATE DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT (GGDCCO), SECTION 4.02.38 SPECIFIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN C-1 THROUGH C-3 ZONING DISTRICTS, SECTION 4.05.02 DESIGN STANDARDS, SECTION 4.05.04 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.05.09 STACKING LANE REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.06.02 BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.06.03 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY, SECTION 4.06.05 GENERAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS; CHAPTER FIVE - SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION 5.05.08 ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS; CHAPTER SIX - INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING SECTION 6.06.02 SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANE AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 6.06.03 STREETLIGHTS; CHAPTER TEN - APPLICATION, REVIEW, AND DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES, INCLUDING SECTION 10.02.15 REQUIREMENTS FOR MIXED USE PROJECTS WITHIN THE BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA; SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; SECTION FIVE, INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND SECTION SIX, EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendments are available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section, Growth Management Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112- 5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman Acct. #068779 May 10, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples Media Group 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, Florida 34110 Re: Amending the Collier County LDC Dear Legals, Please advertise the above referenced notice Wednesday, May 18, 2016 and send the Affidavit of Publication, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500163243 May 9, 2016 Naples Daily News 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 ATTENTION: LEGAL ADVERTISING Please publish the following public notice in your edition on Wednesday, May 18, 2016. Please furnish proof of publication of each advertisement to the Board's Minutes and Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 401, Naples, Florida, 34112. NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE Notice is hereby given that on Thursday, June 2, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Building "F," Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, the Collier County Planning Commission will consider amendments to the Collier County Land Development Code. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO MAKE COMPREHENSIVE CHANGES TO ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS, MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: CHAPTER TWO — ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES, INCLUDING SECTION 2.03.06 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS; CHAPTER FOUR — SITE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION 4.02.12 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE, SECTION 4.02.16 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA, SECTION 4.02.37 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE GOLDEN GATE DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT (GGDCCO), SECTION 4.02.38 SPECIFIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN C-1 THROUGH C-3 ZONING DISTRICTS, SECTION 4.05.02 DESIGN STANDARDS, SECTION 4.05.04 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.05.09 STACKING LANE REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.06.02 BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.06.03 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY, SECTION 4.06.05 GENERAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS; CHAPTER FIVE — SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION 5.05.08 ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS; CHAPTER SIX — INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING SECTION 6.06.02 SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANE AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 6.06.03 STREETLIGHTS; CHAPTER TEN — APPLICATION, REVIEW, AND DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES, INCLUDING SECTION 10.02.15 REQUIREMENTS FOR MIXED USE PROJECTS WITHIN THE BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA; SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; SECTION FIVE, INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND SECTION SIX, EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendments are available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section, Growth Management Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman Martha S. Vergara From: ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 3:07 PM To: Martha S. Vergara Cc: Ivonne Gori Subject: Ad: 1085241, NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINAN Attachments: BCCZONINGD-5-1085241-1.pdf Attached is the document you requested. Please review and let us know if you have any questions. Thank you. Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist 0: 239.213.6061 F: 239.263.4307 E:ivonne.gori@NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 1 > Ad Proof Nihr t 4111 Sales Rep:Ivonne Gori(N9103) Phone:(239)262-3161 Email:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com >Account Information Date:05/10/16 This is a proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below. Please confirm placement prior to deadline by contacting your account Account Number:505868(N068779) Company Name:BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT rep at(239)262-3161 . Ad Id:1085241 P.O.No.:45-163243 Total Cost:$457.75 Contact Name: Email:martha.vergara@collierclerk.com Tag Line:NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINAN Address:3299 TAMIAMI TRL E#700,NAPLES,FL,34112 Start Date:05/18/16 Stop Date:05/18/16 Phone:(239)774-8049 Fax:(239)774-6179 Number of Times:I Class: 16180-Notice Publications:ND-Naples Daily News,ND-Internet-naplesnews.com I agree this ad is accurate and as ordered. NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE Notice is herebygiven that on Thursday.lune 2,201E in the Board of Couny Commissioners Meeting Room,3rd Floor, Building"F,"Collier County Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,Florida 34112,the CDDim Count Planning Commission will consider amendments to the Collier County Land Development Code.The meeting will commence at 9:00 A,M,The title of the proposed ordinance is as fallows: AN ORDINANCE OFTHE BOARDOFCOUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COWER COUNTY,FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR:SECTION ONE,RECITALS;SECTION TWO,FINDINGS OF FACT;SECTION THREE,ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO MAKE COMPREHENSIVE CHANGES TO ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS,MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING:CHAPTER TWO-ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES INCLUDING SECTION 2.03.06 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS; CHAPTER FOUR - SITE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS,INCLUDING SECTION 4.02.12 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE,SECTION 4.02.16 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA, SECTION 4.02.37 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE GOLDEN GATE DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT(GGDCCO),SECTION 4.02.38 SPECIFIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN C-I THROUGH C3 ZONING DISTRICTS,SECTION 4.05.02 DESIGN STANDARDS,SECTION 4.05.04 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.05,09 STACKING LANE REQUIREMENTS,SECTION 4.06,02 BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.06.03 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY,SECTION 4.06.05 GENERAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS;CHAPTER FIVE-SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS,INCLUDING SECTION 5.05.08 ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS; CHAPTER SIX-INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS,INCLUDING SECTION 6.06.02 SIDEWALKS,BIKE LANE AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 6.06,03 STREETLIGHTS; CHAPTER TEN-APPLICATION,REVIEW,AND DECISION- MAKING PROCEDURES, INCLUDING SECTION 10.02.15 REQUIREMENTS FOR MIXED USE PROJECTS WITHIN THE BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA:SECTION FOUR,CONFUCT AND SEVERABILITY: SECTION FIVE,INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE;AND SECTION SIX,EFFECTIVE DATE, All interested parties are invited to appear and he heard.Copies of the proposed amendments are available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section,Growth Management Department,2W0 N.Horseshoe Drive,Naples. Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M..Monday through Friday. Furthermore,materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor. Suite 401,Collier County Government Center,East Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing. If youarea person wit ha disa bility who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 301,Naples,FL 34112.5356 (239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing Impaired are available In the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Collier tothig Commission MarSChairman May 18,2016 No.1085241 Thank you for your business. Our commitment to a quality product includes the advertising in our publications. As such,Journal Media Group reserves the right to categorize,edit and refuse certain classified ads.Your satisfaction is important. If you notice errors in your ad,please notify the classified depart- ment immediately so that we can make corrections before the second print date. The number to call is 239-263-4700. Allowance may not be made for errors reported past the second print date.The Naples Daily News may not issue refunds for classified advertising purchased in a package rate;ads purchased on the open rate may be pro-rated for the remaining full days for which the ad did not run, Martha S. Vergara From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 8:31 AM To: Martha S. Vergara; FrantzJeremy Cc: Cilek, Caroline;Ashton, Heidi; Stone, Scott Subject: FW: LDC Amendments - CCPC Meeting 6/2/16 Attachments: BCCZONINGD-5-1085241-1.pdf Looks good to me, thanks. Wanda Rodriguez, ACP .Advanced Certified ParaCegaC Office of the County .Attorney (239) 252-8400 From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 8:19 AM To: RodriguezWanda; CilekCaroline; AshtonHeidi Subject: LDC Amendments - CCPC Meeting 6/2/16 Hello All, Attached for your review is the LDC Amendments ad proof, let me know of any changes needed. Thanks, Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 1:14 PM To: 'ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com' Subject: RE: 1085241, NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINAN Hi Ivonne, This ad has been reviewed and approved by the legal department, please proceed with publishing as requested. Thanks, Martha Original Message From: ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 3:07 PM To: Martha S. Vergara <Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com> Cc: Ivonne Gori <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: Ad: 1085241, NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINAN Attached is the document you requested. Please review and let us know if you have any questions. Thank you. Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist 0: 239.213.6061 F: 239.263.4307 E:ivonne.gori@NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 1 rr y m t : 61, NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE Notice is hereby given that on Thursday, June 2, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Building "F" Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, the Collier County Planning Commission will consider amendments to the Collier County Land Development Code. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OFTHEBOARDOFCOUNTYCOMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION n TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO MAKE COMPREHENSIVE CHANGES TO ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS,MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING:CHAPTER TWO-ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES, INCLUDING SECTION 2.03.06 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS; CHAPTER FOUR - SITE DESIGN AND Z DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION 4.02.12 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE, SECTION 4.02.16 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA, SECTION 4.02.37 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE GOLDEN GATE DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL ro OVERLAY DISTRICT (GGDCCO), SECTION 4.02.38 SPECIFIC a DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN rp C-1 THROUGH C-3 ZONING DISTRICTS, SECTION 4.05.02 o DESIGN STANDARDS, SECTION 4.05.04 PARKING SPACE a REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.05.09 STACKING LANE REQUIREMENTS,SECTION 4.06.02 BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.06.03 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY, SECTION 4.06.05 GENERAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS;CHAPTER FIVE - SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION Po 5.05.08 ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS; CHAPTER SIX - INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS,INCLUDING cn SECTION 6.06.02 SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANE AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 6.06.03 STREETLIGHTS; N CHAPTER TEN - APPLICATION, REVIEW, AND DECISION- MAKING PROCEDURES, INCLUDING SECTION 10.02.15 REQUIREMENTS FOR MIXED USE PROJECTS WITHIN THE BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA; SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY;. SECTION FIVE, INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE;AND SECTION SIX,EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed amendments are available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section, Growth Management Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. If you area person with adisability who needsany accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112.5356, (239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman May 18,2016 No. 1085241 ? ri B aiLruIEi NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 1085241 NOTICE OF INTENT TO 45-163243 Pub Dates May 18,2016 1 etAfr-er, //?21 6"-Y. (Signure of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me 1 Aro. 'MN IVONNE GORI This May 24, 16 .,`�, Notary Public-State of Florida 1 Commission 0 FF 900870 1 ,,! r My Comm.Expires Jul 16.2019 / 1 '.P,;,,`,OO� Bonded though National Notary Assn. ,meq' 'g (Signatur of affiant) ' • 121 Eti F0 NAPLES DAILY NEws a Wednesday,May 18,2016 a 23D LL Misc.RC tills Nntici Notice To Cretftors RenRids for Rids Requecl for R s LU RENTR Mows LNEABOARO BOAT SUP DR County,Florida has been filed AFTER THE DECEDENT'S DATE INVITATION TO BD Q Naples Daily News offers RENT.Cove Inn Club;all env- and commenced in this Court OF DEATH IS BARRED. pecial packages to help you ledges and utilities included, and you are required to servea The School Board Of a Dire tornty,florida,will accept Sealed COvJ Rent your property now! S800 mo. (239)290-2819. copy of your written defenses. The date of first publication Bids ate noted a of the Director of Purchasing unti12:00 p.m.on f y,to it a DANIEL S. of this notice is:May 18,2016. the date noted below for: Z Best Rental Package e motional Storage if of the Law Offices of Attornefor Personal b•r • Naples Deily News Mandel.Manganelli 8 Leidep BIS TREE �P$Ll n I n ° STORAGE: MOTORNOMES pA pttomeyz for Plaintiff, Representative: 16-062 Technology Equlpm t,Software May 31,2016 C •Marco apes Eagle m RVs, boat, Mo. Covered hose address s 1900 N.W. /s/Kren,L.Keyes,Attorney &Services Catalog Discounts 0 U •The Banner available. (239)643-0447 Corporate Boulevard, Ste. Florida Bar No.0039993 Collier Citizen 305W, Boca Raton, Florida 700 Terrace Point Road,Suite Scope of work n0 requirements 0 http://www. E O .�._rentional Trlilers 33431 and whoseemadaddress 080 demandsfancam/supplier/blds/agent Inc/bid list. 9lines•14D $23550 for service of documents Muskegon,Michigan 49440 yy `� aye THIS WEEK'S SPECIAL sery a TIephone:231-717-2600 asp/fasearch&LP=88&miM0202 or call339-377a04Z Other package options s a del@$mail. vailable 28'A"Osinam"Fiver Upper" I and file the gincl The School Board of Collier County,Florida CO As Is"Come See! c with the Clerk of the above Personal Representative: By/s/Dr.Kamela Patton Q Email; HOLIDAY RV TRAILER SALES styled Court within 30 days /a/Julia A.Van Darnel. Superintendent of Schools CD Z closedl031.sne 19710 South US 41,Ft MyerS fter first publication of Name Authorized by: or Cal 231146.344700 m 279-SN-0066 or vast Notice,otherwise aa default you 8171 Bay Colony Drive,Unit Nancy Sirko,Director of Purchasing _ holidayorkmyers@gmail.com will be entered against you May 17&18,2016 No.1092965 for the relief prayed for Naples,Florida34108 TelephHOMES/OUT bf Stdte a: the Naples, nlorida 418149 07 BIG CANOE,GA-Now accept- /m'T foreclosure the ai of fa mot,[age May 38815,21116 Notice Notice C Z short term reservations Transportation �B on the following dmcnbed No.1093047 for /2 cabin on 3 acres in property. - ND RICEOAR MEETING OFT _ t1 ANDREGULARMEERNGOF THE the exclusive Big Canoe pOTY DEVELOPMENT OOIPMENTDS fain resort hour Classic Cars Lot 13,Block 223,of MARCO 'illere�s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Q O north f Atlanta.H°[tub BEACH UNIT 61X,according l0 N deck and glorious s. PREMIER MOTOR CARS the plat thereof,as recorded The Board of Supervisors of the Portofino Vineyards Enjoy golf,tens,hiking, Sports Cars-Muscle Cars In Plat Book 6,Page 47 through Community Development District will hold ares lar meeting W waterfalls. Expo e 8 shoe Sell/Buy/Trade/Consi5I of the Public Records of ntlaubllc hearing lune 10eN16tl 12:30 PM at the P°rlefl < U nearby mountain towns.For 25241 Bernw000A Dr,Suite 1 Copier County,Florida. 110 place Cove Office,4181 Umbel,Lan 5712,A Myen,Florida 33916, _ photos,rates and availebll- Bonita springs,F1 34135. for the purpose £hearing comments and objections on the ttlisting 5495166 Premiermcarssom Street address:186 Greenbrier of District of the of for the operation and maintenance,thBoard Q r VRBO.eom 3or3 106.5]9-1233. (239)221-3000. Street,Marco Island,FL 34145 of District facilities for rt Go Year 2617.In addition,the Board LV O (706)5]9-1233 will hear public comment and objections relative to the levy of RNOTE:PURSUANT TO THE FAIR like here a non ad valorem assessment pursuant to Florida Law for the Z Z Int.,malidcs P r 5 11�• DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES p g operations and maintenance and principal Wanted Ti:To Rent purpose of funding CH 004co SONIORE•rue THSCT VLAW FIRM ISOU ARE S DEEMED and los facilities throuenses ghhthe l collection of ofacertantrict arates�fees SEMI-RETIRED fund 000aqftmei 02 $13Ood cond;turbo slue various g area sq home nal r02 speed 0.a' turbo engine;- TO BE A DEBT COLLECTOR and charges which are identifiedie within the 000budget(s).A copy I lease.Local ref. ask:manual trans;de hatch- ATTEMPTING TO F COLLECT TI A of the budget(s)may be obtained at the Offices of the District .. (239)919-8825 back; Fully Loaded! 42K DEBT AND ANY INFORMATION Iles:Estate sale,must sell OBTAINED WILL 5355 N.Nob MR Read,Sunrise,Florida 33351,during WILL BE USED FOR Real Estate normal business hours. En $10,300.(239)273-4318. THAT PURPOSE. The Board will also consider any other business,which CHEVROLET IMPALA-1001. This notice shall be may properly come before it.The meeting may be continued published once each week for to a date,[Ime,and place to be specified on the record at O Silver, Sunroof, Leather, two consecutive weeks in the the meeting. The d place,t open a the public end will at Q "-i: Runs well 136K miles,$1000. NspIN DMTy News. conducted in accordance with the provisions of Florida Law for O (139)417-5109. WRNE58 my hand CommunityDevelopmentDistricts- II SAN, 1M112.5320N and se f said Court t14r1 There may be Occasions when One or more Supervisors N sedan,l owner,great cond. s es,Collier County,Florida will Participate by telephone.At the above location there will be ! RAUAN RESTAURANT all hwy miles driven,runs this 13 day of May,2016- resent a speaker telephone so that any interested person ca O a PIZZERIA like a deem,Ramo,kept. attend the meeting at the above location and be fully formed for Sale. eAsking$6599.(239)777-6799 DWIGHT E.BROCK of the discussions taking place either in person or by telephone Located in fast growing area PONIYC GRAND PRIX 2001 As Clerk of the Circuit Court communication. L f y St Naples. red, cold A/C, 1dOK BY:/s/Lep p Heckler Any person'muffing special accommodations t 0 Turnkey.Start Today! As Deputy Clerk this meeting because of a disability pysicaimpairment • 239.293-6674 des/runa very g d.$2900. May 18&25,2016 No.1094169 should contact the District Office at(954)721-8681 at least five (/I Q Serious Inquires Orly! Naples(516)761-3807. calendar days prior to the meeting. No Brokeral Sports and Imports �^� 4 V C) 'C ,,.ii ( Find yours Each person who decides to appeal any dec Sion made by 0 O E.1 _ MERCDES.BENZ E35020U. J" the B08 rd with respect to any matter cons dered at the > Q V U) Go raeous White,with Dano 16-00063-CP ,� meetingg nips that person will need a record Of the AAA BEAUTIFUL SUITES r f.Papa coca Slane IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ti C0.lfiedS en ueetlM1 tzaaverba[Im record accordingly,the needto -Q Q 0 FROM 5295.With conference tracking package. COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA proceedings is ma < Q lin.Call 239-663-1600 AMG wheel package. PROBATE DIVISION including the testimony and evidence upon which such COw mi.MUST SELL! File No.16-00863-CP appeal is to be based. ;. S31K/abe.(23D571-0174 Division Probate Paul Winkeljohn COMMERCIAL SPACE FORIN RE:ESTATE OF WILLIAM SummonsDefendant Menage, LEASE 3,000 square feet Sport Utility Vehicle; VAN DOMELEN LAWLER, Me 18&25,2016 No.1049230 of office spaced8,500 Deceased. 11-2015-CA-061379-001-XX ?Lice C sq feet f house FORD EXPLORER 2006 124K IN THE COURT OF _ _ •� space,all air-conditioned. I,cold A/C,white.52.000. NOTICE TO CREDRORS THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL Located off Old US 41 on Call(239)793-104]eves. CIRCUIT NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE CO Railhead Boulevard In North The administration IN AND FOR COLUER COUNTY, NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANCE CO Nasus s.Can be modified to M'.'l',;-i",NIeepeeo of the estate of William F.Van FLORIDA 03 t.Call 239-260-1073 Domelen deceased, whose Case No.:11-2015-CA-811378- Notice is hereby given that on Thursday,lune 1,2016,in the for information. CUSTOM 2816 Than Chappa date £death w December NI•XX Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,3rd Floor, Ls7 looks d runs g t!5ermui g 2015,and whose Bial Building"F,"Collier County Government Center,3299 Tamiaml V... f�dic'es/W'irehouses Rent only,$10,500.(239)821.6239 security is Ci -8116, Stefean Bultinck Trail East,Naples,Florida 34112,the Center County Planning 0XARLEY DAVIDSON-Heritage pending in the Circuit Court Commission will consider amentlments f°the Collier County OFFOCE WAREHOUSE 1,200 sq. Soft Tail Classic,2033, for Collier County,Florida, Plaintiff, Land Development Code.The meeting will commence at 9:00 ft.3 Offices,Lobby,Recap- les, 10,09metalic blue,perfect probate Division,the address A.M.The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: CO lion,Kitchen+Warehouse shape$10.995,(215)806.7845 of which is 3301 Tamiaml Trail v. Mt KhanN floor at Sun Century East,Naples,FL 34112.The AN COLLIERCE OFTNEBOA FLORIDA, UNTVCOMMISSIONERS X Plaza,North Naples.Great V..o names and addresses of the Lisa McManus, OF COUNTY, RIDA,AMENDING ORDINANCE N _ for Contractors.$1200 mo. personal representative and NUMBER 04-41,AS AMENDED,THE COLUER COUNTY Ln239-269-9531/598-2339 CHRYSLER TOWNr flee withRY the personal representative's Defendant LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE 0PARK SHORE AREA Ezecu- 3014.Wheelchair Van attorney are set forth below. COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE CO < 0 Q five office within large,fully 10"lowered Rr,ramp&tie All creditors of the NOTICE OF SUR TO LMA A. UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA, \ equipped professional office downs.(239)494-8267. decedent and other persons MCLFAMIS 80 PROVIDING FOR:SECTION ONE,RECRALS;SECTION t Z N Z 'te.Shared reception,con- having hems or demands TWO,FINDINGS OF FACT;SECTION THREE,ADOPTION OF Terence room,ate.$995 mo. Vehicle:.Wanted gainf decedent's estate,on To:Lisa A.McManus AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODETO MAKE No lease required.Call for whoma rpy of this notice is COMPREHENSIVE CHANGES TO ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE more Info,(2351261-1888. ABSOLUTELY ALL AUTOS- requiredto be served must Last Known Address: 2201 DESIGN STANDARDS,MORESPECIFlCALLY AMENDING THE Wanted!Dead or RADIO RD. FREE PICK UP 239-1ive 265-6140 coutheir court WITHIN claims THE LATER£his OF Mallory846Circle,Haines City,FL FOLLOINCLUDING SECTION 06 PLANNED O-ZONING DISTRICTSAND UNIT DEVELOPMEENT 0 Mme OHice space. CORVETTES WANTED-Top 3 MONTHS AFTER THE TIME DISTRICTS; CHAPTER FOUR - SITE DESIGN AND XIC 1.564 sq.k. dollar.Cashtoday.Call 941- OF THE FIRST PUBLICATION YOU ARE NOTIFIED, in DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS,INCLUDING SECTION 4.02.12 C $1,5950 CAM 8093660 or 961-923-3621 OF THIS NOTICE OR 30 DAYS dance with Florida DESIGN STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE,SECTION U39)481-1255 AFTER THE DATE Of SERVICE Statute Chapter 49 that an 4.02.16 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE LARGEST BUYER IN L'Autos, OF A COPY OF THIS NOTICE ON action for breach of contract BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA, L D trucks,RV's,cycles.51K to THEM. and unjust enrichment has SECTION 4.02.37 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT O Q Z $1000.Cave,(239)250-2000 All other creditors been ufiled against you and IN THE GOLDEN GATE DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL QSTEARNS MOTORS of the decedent and other you are required to serve a OVERLAY DISTRICT(GGDCCO),SECTION 0.02.38 SPECIFIC O MOST TRUSTED Persons having claims orcopy of your written defenses, DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN EBUYER Since 1971. demands against decedent's if any,to It Callhan F. C-1 THROUGH C•3 ZONING DISTRICTS,SECTION 4.05.02 Q H All Vehicles wanted estate must file their claims Garrett,Plaintiff's Counsel, DESIGN STANDARDS,SECTION 4.05.04 PARKING SPACE Q Financial Rod or Jim(239)774-7360 with this rt WITHIN 3 hose address is 600 Fifth REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.05.09 STACKING LANE C L MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF Avenue South, Suite 207, REQUIREMENTS,SECTION 4.06.02 BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, Z O m Q NEED CREWS We owner THE FIRST PUBLICATION OF Naples,Florida 34102,on or SECTION 4.06.03 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR financed mortgages. Auto Parts a Acc THIS NOTICE. before April 15,2016 and file VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY,SECTION -Q O N Q Receive motes One lump ALL CLAIMS NOT the original with the Collier 4.06.05 GENERAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS:CHAPTER '�nn u Getahie Aete. ALUMINUMWHEELReese MS- FILED WITHIN THE TIME County Clerk of Court tither FIVE-SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS,INCLUDING SECTION Q v/ ,� z 20aw bar 8100 Roost Hitch PERIODS SET FORTH IN before service on PIalMlfks 5.05.08 ARCNRECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS; SECTION 733.702 OF THE Counsel ormediately CHAPTER SIX-INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND --'I....�. FLORIDA PROBATE CODE WILL thereafter; otherwise ADEQUATE PUBLIC FeCILMES REQUIREMENTS.INCLUDING BE FOREVER BARRED. default will be entered against SECTION 6.06.02 SIDEWALKS,BIKE LANE AND PATHWAY Vii,ncy to Chin NOTWITHSTANDING Syou for relief demanded in CHAPEN- SECTION fiANDDCISIOSTREETLIGHTS; THE TIME PERIOD SET FORTH the for the re. CHAPTERIRE TENSA SECTION N,REVIEW,AND DECISION- BRIDGE LOANS ABOVE, ANY CLAIM FILED May 11,18,&25,and lune 1, MAKING PROCEDURES, INCLUDING SECTION 10.02.15 On Commercial Property TWO (2)YEARS OR MORE 2016 No.1022527 REQUIREMENTS FOR MIXED USE PROJECTS WITHIN 3-5 Yr,8%,Interest Only Nr,t;,.,.. THE BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT Local Investor. Notice Nntice. AREA; FIVE,INCLUSION SECTION INFLICT THECOLLIER COUNTYEILA D 901-630.6491 2E CIRCUIT COURT DEVELOPMENT CODE;AND SECTION MX,EFFECTIVE DATE. TITHE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL NONCE OFPUBLICNEARING THETWENTIETHJUDICIAL AND REGULARPINO MEETINGOV OF THE All interested parties are invited to appear and behoard.Copies CIRCUIT TT DEVELOPMENT MEN of the resteded d amendments are avalle ar for bepubliche rdD ction Copies Recreation �_ " IN AND FORFLORIDA COUNTY, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT In the Zoning and Land Development Review Section,Growth CASE NO.2015-CA-002226 The Board of Supervisors of the Portofino Cove Management Department,2800 N Horseshoe Snot,Napos, Cemmurdly Devdopmeel Dbtdet will hold a reyy lar meet ng Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and S00 PM.Monday 1"1"744.""4"1"0,' WILMINGTON SAVINGS oda OffIc hearingg lime 10,2016 at 1230 PM at Bic Portofino through Friday.Furthermore,materalz will ha maderth Floor.FUND SOCIETY.FSB,d/b/a Cart OOOee,4150 Wnbrla Zane m702,Fl Myers,Florida 33916, for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's e,Ece,Fourth noon, CHRISTIANA TRUST, AS for the purpose of hearing comments antl objections on the Suite 401,Collier County Government Center,East Naples,one ROFIMUL.A TRUSTEE OFTHE RESIDENTIAL adopt o f the bud et(s)for the operation antl mm•ntenence Week prior to the scheduled hearing. �/r� CREOiT OPPORTUNITIES anonrlct faoilitles for Race)Year 2611.In eddifion.the soled If youareapersonwith a disabilitywhoneetlsanyaccommotlation Tei/ BOATS TRUST SERIES 2015-1, will hear public comment and oblections relative to the levy of ,der to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at n ad valorem gassessment pursuant to Florida Law for the provision° u-45041005 04.S Staring hi,' Plaintiff, purpose of funding operations and maintenance and principal O cost t°you,to the f certain assistance.Please `.,. ,,, vs, rid Interest expenses of the District The District may also fund c nett the Collier County Facilities Management Division, tri E v- i��lz.;%,-- various facilities through the collection°f certain rates,fees t 3335 Tatman Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356 O LAURA SANSONE,et al., and charges which are Identified within the budget(s).A copy L239)252-8380,of least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted CAPTAIN'S LICENSE f the Manager, S30(z)may be obtained at the offices of the District istenin devices for Me hearing impaired are available In the /�, Naples OUP-435-31 Board of County Commissioner's Office. LiO `` lune 13th 8]7-435-318] Defendants. Manager,5381 N.Nab INR Read,&mdse,Florida 33351,during normal business hours. Mdoer Summer Starve NOTICE OF ACTION/ The Board will also consider any other business,which Collier County Planning Commission as available in Naples for mual- CONSTRUCT may properly come before it.The meeting may be continued Mark Strain,Chairman 03 i£ied boat models!Trailer No EBY PUB ON t a date,time,andplaceto be specified o the record t May ES.2016 810.1085261 a tit not required.Air circulation the meeting. Them ting is open to the public and will be v„r r s x i w system in building. T0: LAURA SIINDNE conducted In accordance with the provisions Of Florida Law for I9z Brokerage service available! Communityy Development Districts. , APPS it 1 Z Call Denny for more info. Lest Known Adtlrers: 186 occasions when Hate to wait? Z39-4/9-3581 Greenbrier Street, Morn will participate by telephone.At the above location there will be �• in KAYAKS AND CANOES Island,FL 31165 Cresenfaspeaker meeting telephone so that any interested pe mon /B! Sales.Rentals.Equipment 6 Mansfield Ct.,Mendham•NJ attend the meeting atthe above location and be fully informed Local News when d¢, RV ESTERO RIVER 239)992-4050. 07945 °f the discussions taking place eche,in person or by telephone YOU andwahowt ! 161 ROYAL HARBOR BOAT SUP Current Address: Unknown communication. 111.111114 ^ S for rent.only 30 minutes t° Any person requiring special accommodations at ii G Gulf,ncluAes electric& TO: SANSONE, this meeting because of a disability physical impairment - f4=6 water!(239)777-4612. UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF LAURA should contact the District Office at(954)721-8681 at least five SANSONE,IF ANY calendar days prior to the meeting. i Y 0111 w it Z ` Campers&RV's Last Known Address: U6 Each person who decides to appeal any decision made by __ /1 WANTED ALL MOTOR HOMES Greenbrier Street, Marco the Board with respect to any matter considered at the ^_ AND CAMPERS.Any cond. Nand,FL 34145 meeting advised that person will need a record of the L = Get it 310N1� r Cash Paid.(956)]89-7530. 6 Mansfield Ct.NNAMm,810 proceedings and that accordingly,the parson may need to ' Curve ensure that verbatim record off the proceedings is made, '. • MOtOTC 61Q5/S O1a44s;_. Current Address: Unknown Includetpeel Is the testimony and evidence upon which such .»> N ) appeal la to be based. DOWNLOAD IT NAPLESNEWS.COMAPPS tHtYOU ARE HEREBY _ e _ 2003 YAMAHA SCOOTER NOTFIED that a Complaint t° Paul Winkeljohn A\ 49c 350 yellow.Like foreclose a mortgage on real Manager � el 5,PFN70,4 B • _ _ �� W Newl$1,200.(239)537.6679 property.located n Collier May 18&25,2016 No.1049206 "'-'- '-� W NAPLES DAILY NEWS « Wednesday, May 18,2016 « 23D e,._ NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE Notice is hereby given that on Thursday, June 2, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Building "F," Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, the Collier County Planning Commission will consider amendments to the Collier County Land Development Code. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OFTHEBOARDOFCOUNTYCOMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE,ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO MAKE COMPREHENSIVE CHANGES TO ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS,MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING:CHAPTER TWO-ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES, INCLUDING SECTION 2.03.06 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS; CHAPTER FOUR - SITE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION 4.02.12 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE, SECTION 4.02.16 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA, SECTION 4.02.37 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE GOLDEN GATE DOWNTOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT (GGDCCO), SECTION 4.02.38 SPECIFIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN C-1 THROUGH C-3 ZONING DISTRICTS, SECTION 4.05.02 DESIGN STANDARDS, SECTION 4.05.04 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.05.09 STACKING LANE REQUIREMENTS,SECTION 4.06.02 BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.06.03 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY, SECTION 4.06.05 GENERAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS;CHAPTER FIVE - SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION 5.05.08 ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS; CHAPTER SIX - INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS,INCLUDING SECTION 6.06.02 SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANE AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 6.06.03 STREETLIGHTS; CHAPTER TEN - APPLICATION, REVIEW, AND DECISION- MAKING PROCEDURES, INCLUDING SECTION 10.02.15 REQUIREMENTS FOR MIXED USE PROJECTS WITHIN THE BAYSHORE GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA; SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; SECTION FIVE,INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE;AND SECTION SIX,EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed amendments are available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section, Growth Management Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman Ma 18,2016 No.1085241 1 ' =team R D Collier County Growth Management Division Architectural and Site Design Standards - LDC Amendment Public Copy AGENDA ITEM 9-D This item has been continued from the December 17, 2015 CCPC meeting, the February 4, 2016 CCPC meeting, the March 3, 2016 CCPC, the March 17, 2016 CCPC meeting, the April 21, 2016 CCPC and the May 5, 2016 CCPC meeting. Attached you will find New information, the previous materials have been updated to reflect the attached materials. An ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the comprehensive land regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by providing for: Section One, Recitals; Section Two, Findings of Fact; Section Three, Adoption of Amendments to the Land Development Code to make comprehensive changes to architectural and site design standards, more specifically amending the following: Chapter Two - Zoning Districts and Uses, including section 2.03.06 Planned Unit Development Districts, section 2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts; Chapter Four - Site Design and Development Standards, including section 4.02.12 Design Standards for Outdoor Storage, section 4.02.16 Design Standards for Development in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, section 4.02.37 Design Standards for Development in the Golden Gate Downtown Center Commercial Overlay District (GGDCCO), section 4.02.38 Specific Design Criteria for Mixed Use Development Within C-1 Through C-3 Zoning Districts, section 4.05.02 Design Standards, section 4.05.04 Parking Space Requirements, section 4.05.09 Stacking Lane Requirements, section 4.06.02 Buffer Requirements, section 4.06.03 Landscaping Requirements for Vehicular Use Areas and Rights-of-Way, section 4.06.05 General Landscaping Requirements; Chapter Five - Supplemental Standards, including section 5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards; Chapter Six - Infrastructure Improvements and Adequate Public Facilities Requirements, including section 6.06.02 Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, section 6.06.03 Streetlights; Chapter Ten - Application, Review, and Decision-Making Procedures, including section 10.02.15 Requirements for Mixed Use Projects Within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area; Section Four, Conflict and Severability; Section Five, Inclusion in the Collier County Land Development Code; and Section Six, Effective Date. [Jeremy Frantz, Senior Planner] Go icr County Agenda Item 9-D Growth Management Department Development Review Division May 26, 2016 Dear Planning Commissioners, The Planning Commission has reviewed the Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad Hoc Committee's proposed amendment at five public meetings between December, 2015, and May, 2015.The attached documents reflect the Planning Commission's recommended changes to the amendment request for final review and recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. Please note that due to the length and complexity,this amendment request does not follow the typical amendment format. The materials for review at the June 2, 2016 meeting include: • The LDC amendment request with minor changes highlighted in yellow; and • The companion LDC amendment request to add and modify cross-references to section 5.05.08; and • The Summary sheet of all advisory board recommendations and approval dates. Additionally, because the Board of County Commissioners require a recommendation from Staff,the Planning Commission's recommended language has been included in the proposed LDC amendment text. Where the Ad Hoc Committee's proposed language differs from the Planning Commission's recommendation, the Ad Hoc Committee's proposed language is demonstrated in the narrative. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the proposed changes to the LDC amendment request. Sincerely, Jeremy Frantz, Senior Planner jeremyfrantz@colliergov.net (239) 252-2305 en Development Review Division•2800 North Horseshoe Drive•Naples,Florida 34104.239-252-2400 •wivw.couiergov.net Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term LDC Amendment Request ORIGIN: Board of County Commissioners AUTHOR: Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad Hoc Committee The Ad Hoc Committee is comprised of members that served on the previous Ad Hoc Committee which produced the current architectural and site design standards prior to 2004 as well as other public citizens, including: James Boughton,AIA Rocco Costa, AIA Kathy Curatolo, CBIA Dalas Disney, AIA Bradley Schiffer, AIA Dominick Amico, P.E. AMENDMENT CYCLE: Independent Cycle LDC SECTION(S): 5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards CHANGE AND REASON: This section describes the proposed updates and revisions recommended by the Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad Hoc Committee (Committee). Staff notes have been included throughout to provide additional analysis of Committee proposals. Amendment History Architectural and site design standards were originally adopted in Ordinance 96-66. The 1996 ordinance describes that the standards were created with the following purpose: "Commercial development depends on high visibility from major public streets. In turn, their design of building(s) and site determines much of the image and attractiveness of the streetscapes and character of a community. Massive and/or generic developments that do not contribute to, or integrate with, the community in a positive manner can be detrimental to a community's image and sense of place. " As a result, the goal of the 1996 architectural standards was "to provide for architectural and site design treatments which will enhance the visual appearance of commercial development in Collier County." The 1996 ordinance included numerous illustrations which were intended to visually depict the standards; however, the Committee believes this had the unintended consequence of architectural features frequently being designed exactly as illustrated. The first comprehensive review of the architectural and site design standards occurred in 2004. At that time, it was found that the standards created in 1996 no longer addressed the needs of the development community, design professionals, or review staff The review resulted in changes such as: 1 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Bold text indicates a defined term • Transferring regulations related to landscaping, parking, and fencing to the appropriate sections of the LDC to make the section more user-friendly; • Providing for more flexibility in implementing the standards by expanding the application of the administrative approval of deviations from specific standards; • Adding new standards in place of requirements that proved to be ineffective in achieving the stated purpose and intent of the standards; • Adding new standards to respond to new development pressures that resulted in taller buildings and multi-story garages; • Proposing separate standards for specific building types; and • Making house-keeping changes to clarify existing language and eliminating discrepancies. On July 24, 2012 the Board of County Commissioners(Board) approved a Staff request for Board direction to review LDC section 5.05.08 in its entirety, with the 2004 authoring committee, in order to propose amendments to the entire section. Staff indicated these amendments would go through the regular LDC amendment vetting process, including review by the Development Services Advisory Committee and the Collier County Planning Commission. As a result of the Board's direction, Resolution 2013-172 established the Collier County Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad Hoc Committee"to review the architectural standards of the LDC."The resolution further establishes that the Committee's functions,powers, and duties shall be to"aid and assist the Board in reviewing the current architectural and site design standards contained in the LDC and make recommendations for updates and revisions." This proposed amendment represents the second comprehensive review of the architectural and site design standards since they were adopted in 1996. At the first meeting on December 11, 2013, the Committee established several goals for their review process, including: • Concentrate on making the architectural standards more user-friendly • Reduce the number of standards • Provide relief from over-restrictive standards imposed only on PUDs • Focus the applicability to the most appropriate areas • Refine applicability for redevelopment projects • Ensure that the standards are focused on big-box stores • Reduce costs to businesses • Remove civil engineering or site design elements from the architectural standards The Committee considered three potential alternatives in order to achieve these goals: 1) leave the current standards, 2) amend the standards, or 3) eliminate the standards. On January 9th, 2014, a vote of the members present resulted in a recommendation (4-1) to eliminate the architectural standards entirely. This vote was motivated by the belief that the existing architectural standards do not ensure great architecture. In fact, the Committee feels the standards can make it difficult to build unique buildings. It was also noted that some members of the Committee feel that landscaping requirements provide more visual appeal than the architectural requirements. However, upon reevaluation of the initial vote to remove the section, the Committee chose to also pursue the option to amend the standards as that was the task assigned by the Board. 2 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2 Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Public input The Committee held numerous meetings between December 2013 and April 2016 which were open to the public. Several individuals and stakeholders attended and provided comments at these meetings. The amendment was also distributed to several stakeholder groups, including: architecture,real estate, and landscape architecture professionals. Input was received from several of these groups, and members of the public. The narrative describes where this input was incorporated into the amendment or used to justify the Committee's proposed changes. Infill and redevelopment code Both the Committee and the Planning Commission made a recommendation to develop an "infill and redevelopment code" in order to create architectural and site design standards that more comprehensively address redevelopment issues. Site design requirements may change in many areas throughout Collier County due to changes in occupancy or changes to the Land Development Code. Since many sections of the Land Development Code were created for new development, when new businesses occupy existing buildings,new site design requirements can make it difficult to build on some sites. While some of the Committee's goals may address infill and redevelopment issues, it was stated that a new section of code specifically focused on these issues may be a more effective method of addressing these issues and encouraging infill and redevelopment. Committee recommendation On September 14, 2015, the Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad-Hoc Committee unanimously approved (5-0) a draft amendment to be forwarded to other advisory boards and the Board of County Commissioners for review.Additional changes were approved by the Committee on November 16, 2015, March 4, 2016 and April 6, 2016. DSAC-LDR RECOMMENDATIONS: The DSAC-LDR Subcommittee approved the proposed amendment unanimously on November 3, 2015 with recommendations for changes to window standards for self-storage buildings, drive-through standards, and other clarifications. These recommendations have been incorporated into the current draft. DSAC RECOMMENDATION: No changes, approved unanimously. FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS: There are no anticipated fiscal or operational impacts associated with this amendment. RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: Staff has provided a companion amendment with proposed changes to other sections of the LDC in order to add new or updated cross-references to LDC section 5.05.08 to increase awareness of the architectural standards. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: An underlying concept expressed as a basis for the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) is Attainment of High Quality Urban Design. This concept provides the rational nexus for the existing Architectural requirements of the Land Development Code (LDC), but is not a mandate for any specific code requirement. Any amendments to the existing architectural code would not be found inconsistent with the GMP. 3 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term OTHER NOTES/VERSION DATE: ., Index of changes: Proposed Sections Page 5.05.08 A - Purpose and Intent . 5 5.05.08 B - Applicability .. 6 5.05.08 C - Submittal Requirements .17 5.05.08 D - Building Design Standards 18 5.05.08 E - Design Standards for Specific Building Uses 45 5.05.08 F - Site Design Standards .55 5.05.08 G - Deviations and Alternate Compliance 59 Appendix A 61 Due to its length and complexity, this amendment does not follow the typical LDC amendment format. Rather than a description of all proposed changes followed by all proposed LDC text changes, this amendment will describe the changes and present the proposed LDC text changes in each section individually. These sections are described as shown below: Proposed changes that are recommended by the Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad Hoc Committee and the Planning Commission are described with black outlines. Proposed changes that are recommended by only the Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad Hoc Committee are described in blue bubbles. Proposed changes that are recommended by only the Planning Commission are described in purple bubbles. For those provisions that include separate recommendations from the Committee and the Planning Commission both versions are presented within the amendment text and are formatted as a table to provide context for each proposal. An example of this formatting is shown here: Committee Proposal Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad Hoc Committee's proposed and strike through text changes here Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission's proposed and strike through text changes here 4 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Amend the LDC as follows: 1 5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards Description of changes to proposed section 5.05.08 A—Purpose and Intent OVERVIEW of changes to purpose and intent sections LDC section 5.05.08 A describes the purpose and intent of Collier County's architectural and site design standards. This section currently lists several design goals and describes that the standards are intended to result in "the development of a positive, progressive and attractive community image and sense of place [which] is vital to the economic health and vitality of Collier County." While the purpose and intent section does not contain any specific regulations, it provides general guidance regarding the intent of the standards and aids in the design process and analysis of proposed projects. Proposed Section 5.05.08 A.5 (page 6) This section currently describes that the architectural standards are intended to be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Land Development Code, and to promote crime prevention. During their review, the Committee received public comments identifying several causes of bird collisions with buildings such as substantial glass façades,the use of highly reflective glass,and upward facing lighting. As a result, the Committee has added a statement to this section which encourages the use of bird safe materials. LDC section 5.05.08 A 2 A. Purpose and Intent. 3 1. The purpose of these standards is to supplement existing development criteria in 4 order to complement, enhance and enrich the urban fabric of Collier County with 5 an abundant variety of architecture. The development of a positive, progressive 6 and attractive community image and sense of place is vital to the economic 7 health and vitality of Collier County. 8 2. Among the recurring details that are present in the architecture of Collier County 9 include, but are not limited to, the following: 10 a. Elements of Mediterranean design employing sloped barrel tile roofs, 11 arcades and stucco; 12 b. Old Florida design with wide verandas, metal roofs and lap siding; 13 c. Modern International; and 14 d. Various traditional historic references to Colonial, Bermuda and Island 15 forms. 16 3. Building design contributes to the uniqueness of the project area and the Collier 17 County community with predominant materials, design features, color range and 18 spatial relationships tailored specifically to the site and its context. 19 4. While architectural embellishments are not discouraged, emphasis on scale, 20 massing, form-function relationships, and relationship of the building or 21 buildings to the site and surrounding context is strongly encouraged. 22 Recognition of the environment and climate present in Collier County must be 23 evident in the architecture. Gratuitous decoration applied to the building is 24 strongly discouraged. 5 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 5. These standards and guidelines are intended to result in a comprehensive plan 2 for building design and site development consistent with the goals, policies and 3 objectives of the Collier County Growth Management Plan ("GMP") and the 4 purpose and intent of the Land Development Code ("LDC"). These regulations 5 are intended to promote the use of crime prevention through site design 6 principals, including visibility-site lines for law enforcement as well as the general 7 public. Additionally, the use of glazing materials and designs which reduces bird 8 collisions is encouraged. 9 6. To maintain and enhance the attractiveness of the streetscape and the existing 10 architectural design of the community, all buildings must have architectural 11 features and patterns that provide visual interest from the perspective of the 12 pedestrian, reduce building mass, recognize local character, and respond to site 13 conditions. Façades must be designed to reduce the mass/scale and uniform 14 monolithic appearance of large unadorned walls. Facades must provide, through 15 the use of detail and scale, visual interest that is consistent with the community's 16 identity and character. Articulation is accomplished by varying the building's 17 mass, in height and width, so that it appears to be divided into distinct elements 18 and details. 19 OVERVIEW of which buildings are subject to the architectural standards Currently, the provisions set forth in section 5.05.08 of the LDC apply to buildings or projects in four scenarios: 1. First, the standards apply to all new buildings and projects within commercial, non- residential PUD districts, and Business Park zoning districts. 2. Second, the standards apply to non-residential buildings, when located on an arterial or collector roadway or within a certain distance of a residentially zoned district. 3. Third, the standards also apply to non-residential renovations and redevelopment projects under certain circumstances. 4. Fourth, the standards apply under certain circumstances after the abandonment and discontinuance of use of a building. The Committee proposes to make changes to these scenarios as detailed below. Additionally, `please see Appendix A for more information regarding measuring distances from the right-of-way.J Committee proposed changes to section 5.05.08 B.1 —Applicability by zoning district Proposed Section 5.05.08 B.1. Applicability by zoning district (page 11) This section establishes the zoning districts to which the architectural standards apply. Currently, these districts include commercial zoning districts, non-residential PUD districts and non- residential components of any PUD district (i.e. Mixed Use PUDs which include more than one type of PUD district like commercial, civic, or institutional tracts), and business park districts. The Committee supports requiring non-residential buildings along the perimeter of a PUD to comply with architectural standards (accomplished in B.2) but does not support requiring non-residential buildings on the interior of a PUD to comply. The Committee's intent is to not require buildings that are on the interior of a PUD, such as maintenance buildings, ancillary buildings, and --- clubhouses in a residential PUD (generally private uses) to comply. The Committee stated that 6 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term PUDs can establish their own architectural standards through the zoning process. As a result, in order to limit the applicability of architectural standards to commercial areas only, the Committee proposes the section apply to"commercial components of PUD zoning districts,and Business Park zoning districts." The Committee's proposed change is as follows: B. Applicability. The provisions of LDC section 5.05.08 shall apply to the zoning districts, locations, and to existing buildings as established below. 1. Buildings and projects within the following zoning districts: a. Commercial zoning districts and commercial components of PUD zoning districts. b. Business park zoning districts. Staff notes: This change means that non-residential PUD districts (like Mixed Use PUDs, research or technology park PUDs, industrial PUDs, or community facilities PUDs) will not be required to comply with architectural standards unless they meet the location criteria in proposed section 5.05.08 B.2. This change may impact the aesthetic predictability of schools, churches, or other community facilities. CCPC proposed changes to section 5.05.08 B.1 —Applicability by zoning district The Planning Commission recommends that non-residential PUD zoning districts and non- residential components of any PUD district are retained for the following reasons: • Collier County's landscaping and architecture standards have been important factors in creating a community character that is among the best in the nation. • Removing architectural standards for non-residential PUDs and non-residential components of PUD districts would exempt too many types of buildings from complying with the architectural standards. The Planning Commission's recommendation is represented in the amendment text. Proposed changes to section 5.05.08 B.2 through B.4—Applicability by project clocation and exceptions Proposed Section 5.05.08 B.2 through B.2.b—Applicability by project location (page 11) Currently, compliance with the architectural standards is required for all non-residential buildings and projects that are located on an arterial or collector road. The Committee proposes that the architectural standards apply differently under five separate scenarios, with reduced architectural standards between 150 to 300 feet from roadways or residential zoning districts. The first three scenarios are described in B.2.a-b as follows: 7 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term ' 1) If the project site is located within 300 feet of an arterial or collector road, including all All architectural standards apply. rights-of-way, and is located in a non-industrial zoning district. 2) If the proposed project site is a. The project shall be required to comply with LDC located within 150 to 300 feet sections 5.05.08 D.3., D.9., D.12., D.14., E, and F. of an arterial or collector road, b. Further, compliance shall be limited to the building including all rights-of-way. façades facing the arterial or collector road. 3) If the project site is located on an arterial road and is located All architectural standards apply in an industrial zoning district. For all sites located in a industrial zoning district on an arterial road,the proposed change is based on the lack of visibility of an industrial building by the general public as the structure is mainly viewed by employees. Although generally an industrial structure is utilized for production, LDC section 2.03.04 A.1.b.3 allows for 20 percent of the gross floor area to be used as retail space in Industrial Zoning Districts. Therefore, customers may visit the site to purchase goods. Many of the industrial buildings utilize this option and have incorporated show/sales rooms for clientele. The proposed change identifies that when the project site is located within 150 to 300 feet of an arterial or collector road, the project shall be required to comply with LDC sections 5.05.08 D.3., D.9., D.12., D.14., E, and F. These sections include the following standards (See Table 1 for more information): �s`'i ` `� tic � � _• t .��- I r'= "+ t , ��. ; ,..... a.. 5.05.08 D.3 Variation in massing 5.05.08 D.9 Roof treatments 5.05.08 D.12 Building colors and materials 5.05.08 D.14 Neon tubing prohibition 5.05.08 E Design standards for s.ecific building uses 5.05.08 F Site design standards Proposed Section 5.05.08 B.2.c -Applicability by project location continued(page 12) This section describes the fourth and fifth applicability scenarios described in LDC section 5.05.08 B.2.Currently,architectural standards apply when a proposed building's footprint is located within 300 feet (the length of a football field) of a residential zoning district boundary. The Committee proposes to reduce the number of architectural standards that apply to buildings between 150 and 300 feet from the boundary of the residentially zoned district. Therefore, the fourth and fifth applicability scenarios are proposed as follows: 4) Where a proposed building's footprint would be located All architectural standards apply. within 300 feet of the boundary of a residentially zoned district. 8 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Bold text indicates a defined term 5) Where a proposed building's a. The building shall be required to comply with LDC footprint would be located sections 5.05.08 D.3., D.9., D.12., D.14., and E, and F within 150 to 300 feet of the (see Table 1 for more description of these sections). boundary of a residentially b. Further, compliance shall be limited to the building zoned district. façades facing the residential district. The Committee proposes that reducing the applicable standards between 150 and 300 feet is sufficient based on examples such as: • The football and track area of St. John Neumann High School: In this case, a concession building/PE fitness building was required to have a primary façade and a landscape buffer to shield an overhead door that was located 300 feet away from residential property. However, the football field fronted a local street. It was stated by the applicant that the architectural features required in this case were not effective. • The First Baptist Academy: In this case,a field house was required to meet architectural standards because it was within 300 feet of residential property. The Committee described that the building's entrance faced an internal parking lot and the rear of the building was separated from residential property by a track and field area. In addition, the Committee relayed that landscape buffers or walls could be within 150 feet and provide visual relief. The proposed change identifies that when the building footprint is located within 150 to 300 feet of a residentially zoned district,the project shall be required to comply with LDC sections 5.05.08 D.3., D.9., D.12., D.14., E, and F. These sections include the following standards (See Table 1 for more information): 5.05.08 D.3 Variation in massing 5.05.08 D.9 Roof treatments 5.05.08 D.12 Building colors and materials 5.05.08 D.14 Neon tubing prohibition 5.05.08 E Design standards for specific building uses 5.05.08 F Site design standards OVERVIEW of Proposed Section 5.05.08 B.3—Applicability for alterations and existing buildings (page 12) This section currently provides that when renovations or redevelopment meet the established criteria,the entire façade or building must comply with the architectural standards. The Committee proposes to change the criteria so that it is based only on the percentage of the area that is being altered. This means that the applicability of the architectural standards would no longer be determined by the cost of the alterations. Additionally, the Committee proposes that interior renovations to existing buildings which do not affect the external appearance should not be required to comply with architectural standards. 9 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be did Bold text indicates a defined term The Committee believes that the proposed changes incentivize re-use, renovation, infill development, and the use of existing infrastructure by reducing the number of building alterations required to comply. In utilizing nonconforming and older structures, the provision is designed to maintain and increase the value of nonconforming and older structures. The Committee utilized the vested rights section of the LDC as a basis for this change. Additional details regarding the changes to the exemptions section are provided below. Proposed Section 5.05.08 B.3.a.i—Applicability for alterations and existing buildings continued (page 13) Currently, for buildings constructed after November 10, 2004, if 50 percent of a building's façade area is renovated, the entire façade and site design elements must comply with the architectural standards.The proposed change increases the percentage of change to the façade area to 75 percent of any façade area. This change is intended to incentivize re-use, renovation, infill development, and the use of existing infrastructure. Proposed Section 5.05.08 B.3.a.ii -Applicability for alterations and existing buildings continued (page 13) Currently, additions, renovations, or redevelopment of an existing project require all existing structures and site improvements to conform to the current architectural standards when either: • The cost of the project exceeds 50 percent of the assessed value of the existing structure, or • The area of the change exceeds 25 percent of the square footage of the gross area of the existing structures. The Committee proposes to remove the criteria related to the cost of the project and to increase to the area of the change to 50 percent. These changes are intended to incentivize re-use, renovation, infill development, and the use of existing infrastructure and are anticipated to provide relief for projects with depressed property values. Staff note: The Committee's proposal excludes interior renovations from being counted toward the 50 percent threshold. In addition, site improvements are not included in this calculation. Therefore, only additions to a building or demolitions to a building which exceed the 50 percent threshold will be required to bring the entire project site up to current architectural standards. However, the thresholds identified in LDC sections 5.05.08 B.3.a.i-ii are not intended to create exemptions for additions, renovations, or redevelopment from complying with the architectural standards. Proposed section 5.05.08 B.3.b - Applicability for alterations and existing buildings continued (page 13) The Committee also proposes to add a new section for additions, renovations, or redevelopment for nonconforming buildings. The date of November 10, 2004 is used to identify nonconforming buildings because the proposed standards are less restrictive than the current standards so buildings constructed after November 10, 2004 (before the proposed standards are adopted) will still conform to the proposed standards. The Committee proposes that in these cases,only the alteration should be required to comply with architectural standards and that unaltered portions of a 10 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term nonconforming building or the project site should not be required to meet architectural standards. The proposed change is based on the fact that if a building were never altered, there would never be a trigger for a building to comply with architectural standards. The Committee relayed that if an alteration to a building would not increase the nonconformity, any architectural or site design issues related to the nonconforming portions of the building would not be affected and therefore should not be required to comply with architectural standards. Furthermore, this change would incentivize the renovation of older buildings by reducing restrictions and associated costs. In addition, limiting the applicability to the altered façade may reduce the costs associated with the renovation of an older building or a building with depressed property values. The Committee further stated that if the County always requires a renovation to comply with the code it would not allow for historic buildings. Proposed section 5.05.08 B.3.c - Applicability for alterations and existing buildings continued (page 13) Currently, alterations to existing buildings are required to comply with the materials and colors standards in LDC section 5.05.08 D.12. This includes standards for paint colors and limits on exterior building materials like metal panels and the prohibition on neon tubing. The Committee proposes that upon repainting the exterior of an existing building or fence, the exterior building colors shall only be required to comply with paint standards. The Committee relayed that this change would assist in improving the design and renovation of older buildings and may reduce the costs associated with the renovation. The Committee's intent is to improve the design of older buildings, by reducing restrictions and associated costs. Once again, the Committee stated further that if the County always requires a renovation to comply with the code it won't allow for historic buildings. Proposed section 5.05.08 B.4—Exceptions from architectural standards (page 14) This section currently identifies when the architectural standards apply to buildings that have been abandoned or their use has been discontinued. The Committee proposes the removal of this section as it is a detriment to redevelopment opportunities and prevents reinvestment in existing buildings. In addition,the Committee relayed that buildings lose value due to this regulation and it will assist in maintaining market value of existing structures.If the section is removed,architectural standards would only apply to abandoned or discontinued buildings if alterations to the building are proposed and required to comply through zoning, locational, or alterations criteria. This section has been replaced with a list of exceptions that identify when a building or project that would otherwise be required to comply with architectural standards is exempt from complying with all or parts of this section. As a result, historic buildings (pursuant to LDC section 2.03.07 E or designated by the State of Florida or the Federal Government),buildings in a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district in the non-coastal urban designated area on the Future Land Use Map, and façades facing an interior courtyard are proposed to be exempt from all architectural standards. Routine repairs and maintenance to existing buildings, and public utility ancillary systems would only be required to comply with paint color standards (This does not include the materials standards in LDC section 5.05.08 D.12). LDC section 5.05.08 B -Applicability 1 B. Applicability. The provisions of section 5.05.08 apply: 11 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Bold text indicates a defined term 1 _ _ --. -- - e - - e - - -e--• - e - - _ ! ee' - -- 2 zoning districts set out below. At the applicant's request, projects submitted 3 between November 10, 2004 and January 2, 2005 may be reviewed for 4 compliance with the requirements of section 5.05.08 as they were set forth in the 5 LDC before November 10, 2004. 6 a. Commercial zoning districts. 7 b. Non residential PUD districts, and non residential components of any 8 PUD district. 9 c. Busine 's park districts. 10 B. Applicability. The provisions of LDC section 5.05.08 shall apply to the zoning districts, 11 locations, and to existing buildings as established below. 12 1. Buildings and projects within the following zoning districts: 13 a. Commercial zoning districts and commercial components of PUD zoning 14 districts. 15 b. Non-residential PUD zoning districts and non-residential components of 16 any PUD district. 17 c. Business park zoning districts. 18 2. To non residential buildings and projects submitted on or after November 10, 19 2001 in any zoning district, but only when the following conditions exist: 20 a. The project site is located on an arterial or collector road, as described by 21 the Traffic Circulation Element of the GMP, or 22 b. A proposed building's footprint would be located within 300 feet ofhe 23 boundary of a residentially zoned district. 24 2. Non-residential buildings and projects when at least one of the following 25 conditions exists. For the purposes of this section, arterial and collector roads 26 are identified in the Traffic Circulation Element of the GMP. 27 a. The project site is located within 300 feet of an arterial or collector road, 28 including all rights-of-way, and is located in a non-industrial zoning 29 district. 30 i. However, a proposed project site located within 150 to 300 feet of 31 an arterial or collector road, including all rights-of-way, shall be 32 required to comply with LDC sections 5.05.08 D.3., D.9., D.12., 33 D.14., E, and F. Compliance shall be limited to the building 34 facades facing the arterial or collector road. 35 b. The project site is located on an arterial road and is located in an 36 industrial zoning district. 37 c. Where a proposed building's footprint would be located within 300 feet of 38 the boundary of a residentially zoned district. 39 i. However, where a proposed building's footprint would be located 40 within 150 to 300 feet, the building shall be required to comply 41 with LDC sections 5.05.08 D.3., D.9., D.12., D.14., and E, and F. 42 Compliance shall be limited to the building facades facing the 43 residential district. 44 3. To all renovations and redevelopment, including applicable additions of a building 45 e . _ - - e - - „ " - - - „ -e - - - - -ee e e- -- 4647 a. Any addition or renovation of an-existing building or project including 48 -- - - _ - - -- - - " - - - -49 November 10, 2004) that will result in a change to the exterior of the 50 building or site such that in the case of: 12 1:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 a. A building facade renovation where such addition, renovation, or 2 3 --- - --- - -- - - -- -4 Section 5.05.08 5 ii. An addition or renovation to, or redevelopment of, an existing 6 building or project, where the cost of such addition, renovation, or 7 redevelopment exceeds 50 perccnt of the assessed value of the 8 - -- -- - -- - 9 footage of the gross area of the existing structures, the existing 10 building(s) and the site improvements must conform with the 11 standards of Section 5.05.08 12 iii. Upon repainting an existing building, the colors to be applied must 13 comply with Section 5.05.08 0.13. Materials and colors. 14 3. Alterations to an existing building, including applicable additions of a building or 15 site, which is subject to LDC section 5.05.08 B.1 or B.2 above shall comply with 16 this section as described in the following sections. For the purposes of this 17 section, an alteration shall be any change to the elements subject to LDC section 18 5.05.08. Interior renovations to an existing building that do not affect the 19 external appearance of the building are excluded. 20 a. Any addition or renovation of an existing building or project, including 21 vehicular use areas, that will result in a change to the exterior of the 22 building or site such that in the case of: 23 i. Where facade improvements result in a change to more than 75 24 percent of the facade area, the entire facade shall comply with 25 the standards of LDC section 5.05.08. 26 ii. Where an addition or renovation to, or redevelopment of, an 27 existing building or project, exceeds 50 percent of the square 28 footage of the gross area of the existing structures, the existing 29 building(s) and the site improvements must comply with the 30 standards of LDC section 5.05.08. 31 b. Nonconforming buildings approved for use and occupancy prior to 32 November 10, 2004 shall not be enlarged or altered in a way which 33 increases the nonconformity. All alterations or facade improvements to 34 nonconforming buildings shall be consistent with Section 5.05.08 and 35 shall be reviewed for compliance by the County Manager or designee; 36 however, unaltered portions of the nonconforming building will not be 37 required to comply. 38 c. Upon repainting the exterior of an existing building or fence, the exterior 39 building colors shall comply with the standards identified in LDC section 40 5.05.08 D.12.b. 41 4. Abandonment or discontinuance of use. 42 a. Buildings or projects that are abandoned (i.e. their existing use ceases) 43 44 1. Where the use of a structure, building or project ceases for any 45 reason, except where government action impedes acct;., to the 46 premises, for a period in excess of one year, the provisions of 47 Section 5.05.08 apply before re occupancy. Compliance with this 48 49 ii. The site design standards of this Section apply where the use of a 50 structure ceases for any reason, except where governmental 13 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 action impedes access to the premises for a period of more than 2 180 consecutive days. 3 4. Exceptions. 4 a. A historic site, structure, building, district, or property that is designated 5 historic by the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to LDC section 6 2.03.07 E or is designated historic by the State of Florida or the Federal 7 Government. 8 b. The Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district in the non-coastal urban 9 designated area as established in the Future Land Use Map. 10 c. Facades facing an interior courtyard provided the facades are not visible 11 from any public property (e.g. street, right-of-way, sidewalk, alley), 12 interior drive, parking lot or adjacent private property. 13 d. The following shall be exempt from the standards of LDC section 5.05.08, 14 but shall comply with the exterior building color standards identified in 15 LDC section 5.05.08 D.12.b. 16 i. Routine repairs and maintenance of an existing building. 17 ii. Public utility ancillary systems provided that a building shall 18 not have any wall planes exceeding 35 feet in length, excluding 19 storage tanks, or have an actual building height greater than 20 eighteen (18) feet, excluding storage tanks and communications 21 equipment. See LDC section 4.06.05 B.4 for screening 22 requirements of fences and walls surrounding public utility 23 ancillary systems. 24 5. Public utility ancillary systems in Collier County arc not required to meet the 25 provisions of this Section provided that a building containing any of these uses 26 shall not have any wall planes exceeding 35 feet in length, excluding storage tanks, 27 or have an actual building height greater than eighteen (18) feet, excluding 28 - - - - - -- '• - -- - '- - - •" - - - - -- -2 • 9 • - - 30 - - ' '= ' --e - - - --- e - - -•9-.9 -•- 31 5.05.08. D.1. SUMMARY of changes to applicability sections Table 1, below, demonstrates the proposed changes to the applicability sections and design standards based on building location. Table 2, below, demonstrates the proposed changes to the design standards based on building size. These tables provide a general overview and do not reflect how specific standards have been modified. Table 3,below, demonstrates how the architectural standards are proposed to change for industrial buildings. The most significant changes demonstrated in Table 3 include the elimination of architectural standards for industrial buildings on collector roads and the reduction of applicability when an industrial building is within 150 feet to 300 feet of a residentially zoned district. 14 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx C 1014%, 0 oCh a) a) a) CDD ft) C CD m m co CD Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl CD rn•' ClClrnr ,n•' E v cil N v rn-' AP CP r r* = rt _ — I- O O O o O r' O O O O O• O Di �• v0_+• 2 v 0 f~D p 7 7 7 7 7 O 7 7 7 3 7 N• O rrt fD O- y..1 n 0 0 0 0 0 .. 3 p p p p p 3 O pq' p 3 W N N O N 00 V Ol ir, aD S N r 1 CD 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I rr o (p Ori Z W W m cn N N N 0 * W W cn N N cn cn cn N N to cn I d0 R 3 D (o co fD rD d < F CCD, ro ro rD rD Cl) Cl) fD co fD -ti fD CD rD - C, r3•r .z .n-r C) rr) rnr = C 7 n n n n n n n n n n -, 3 "O CD 0 S O_ „-5 a S a a, r* r* r* r* r* r* .. r+ .-i.. r•r -• Q A� o O O O curt o a o o o o o O O O O O V. K - O 04 N cicl 7 7 = O a O Oo 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 7 7 Di • V)• o 6 O n ,< h p p p 0 ..n a — p p p p p p p p p p p < O CD 3 fD o n io iD in •P o p w D w w •w w w w X . . . CU : N) DA v, o C O Q O_ n O- -, 00 Q rD Qq 6 v d v n) a) n n n 'n O v, E _. = 1 _ O ;, a) m = 1 < c• _. =: . . . n. ►�' v o a a °u O Q v I I 1 I 1 Q n O ro rrJ m a u I I O o v CU °� d 1 I I 1 ,-_„ a m p 3 v X x x x •x _E C- 7• 7 rD m �+ 3, ~' r* v a v, = = 0) a 3 C� D , n) m r<o oa' 0Q o, r* co 'n ,°� ,n 'n a 3 3 3 3 T UQ p fD n n r. 3 m S lD CD (D rD _ C '6 1r n v 0) d O_ , or0 ELT (IT (D 'a O n Q Q Q rD 0.6 3 3 3 3 oz 0 ut () 70 .10 (D rmig 30 r-+ rN•r d v c v 0�4 OA O�q = •rD rte, rD• n Q rNi 3 O fl) 11) a. N N S S S _ rnr r-r (p 0) a C n n fD _� 3O o O 7 'n" a 0 O CD rte+ N fD ''* �' �• 7 O cn p o) fD rn 0 0 4 oo . ? ? a a 0) 3 3 ,�•r W r�o roo rao ro r�o n m r�i c v E. B n n 3 a 0 -o MS `a) v 3 a ►s NN in �' �' v V v,rD N cn fp fp N al A p N II II II II II N N v, V 0_ O_ U', V N N (-n II II II II 0) a a O O u, O `N O N co 0, •P A N o OC -h , O rte'+ O , :-'r v v v, w N A: O 3r�'i O a O r'•• �, j CA o d v �. A O o 0 o , Ln et 3 II II 0! y m 00 O. o T fD m c_ rt Or 0) ro 0 m a : L,QOt V' °) C \� O_ = 0) \�� cD A O Q r. Q. CM x k\\iii' C d 3 N n cD �. \\\ ig �� o3a3 � ca'a � g roc o' �. oo cn O O, 0 3 A m r., Cs \ 3 C O v, v, 3 _ ` vim, .. r3.' U3q `11' 3 Cr O . \ .0 'p d O- Z � n • Vi C Nil ji 0 . 3 ami F-, 0 \ VI a Z 'Dl �� A O n n C N (") 1Z ro ct C D) cio - O1 a C v C IV 3 v v, v_, C) v, G. n 3 Q H CO "ft. O O n a rD d ft CDD Ozt. 3' O) W El' O_ 0 7 pap O. 01 C =n CM O O' 3 trq n ? Q: W 'o �, o IV• n CM -, r. O O a1 n C OCL O, C 0 . 3 Z >v n O O r rD ; o w ro •C. *� \ . 3 o rD 0 n -' 0 mm. w, - O NN °ii ' f D o roc n) r* o o m 3 AcA v, o, .+, rt r* i 'O p, Q" 3 O. d 0 n v e c W n K C rD S a CD 0) -, O co 0 r "S ��> O m ..; C a,CDD o. 3 D ... � 3 O, 3 fD n) 0 i O d a. rni• Ln_ H a H 3 < s00 (D cnCD fg G 15 ry vim, U1 3 - C = et •\\ 'it C o3a N o v, < el. CD O. a 3' CCD b m '+ Q Z n m n °-= o 3 Q W ' :, m r+3 o rDCill3 r* W n a ; m �•, n - v '' a '" m fD , 5 fD 7 o = ' A o �\ � Ni 0 Q S r0•r ro fly)' 0'h, a j \ � O. N• N - -a • N � �� N 3 N m ;* O_ 3fD a 0) N ' a j ,: co a) " E U a) ' -0 ' ,4 .,� Cu ' a U -a y v Cr u o a� 6 � � ate• ca w . ° 6 . : a C% U U 0.1 45 " 'd Z D \ !Y a) 0 E U cc U F vs CD C U 0 Lo CD 7 -O K CO N MMy Cr) h+y \ u La U O N v� \ vas CL us 0 U --E- = o us i, E 0 00 ip 0 L,"' ,NNP- . „, II IIca c ice.+ v C r. •Q a CO co }; ^ o o n C ° O 00 4- U U (4.4 �.+ ;ra, V ..moi a) CO CO r-1 O N OO cn , w Ta �"" = I I I I I I I I Ln ,-I `� ,-,'-'1 ul C O O Cu U �n ' II II II II 0 O N II i i N U U U O_ Q' N a) a' m c cn a) • a ° o °c° E co +... a)m O ti �„ E c .E .E o E E E 0 " _ •- — E 0 p = o 0 o E E ° o o E OC ._ ,_ ._ Ero a ' '� v v t v *' U U0 0 �, +�-+ aJ a1Li- co v{'i N U N = ,715 CC a- 2 aJ a! cn C d ro 'O "a "a L, 11 E E E E v o a u +� c a. 73 ¢ r� c� s= N �� w W e� I I I I `° F- m E E cn C w 1 U I 1 I I 1 5 C v . o O °o p 3 o oea cn N to := i= : := .- := :E . > I •A ¢ m o O I I to U O N O wiz LL �i U ci Li co ra ca ro co p 1 :1-.! c j �j U v v� o X X X X m m m m m m m N •- I - = U co o D D o °c° U a o c 3 c c c CC 0 c C C c c c c c c c =p E- 2 c2 -0 m ai m of .E Q o a C. a L o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — c a� c p p p o 3 c a' E Cr ++ +� .— '++ •++ ++ +•+ ++ aJ + O > �� ¢ W m m Z O i." ^� oC U U U U U U U U U U m CO 5 O cn c c C c I I C O v a� a� v v v u ai o v , I O o O O a) C•0 v1 v1 v) v) v) v) v) v) v) '4F.,, +� ON m E UN 11) LID. I� W U U U cI ,__,'--1 -i cI cI ¢ n = SUOI�ISU2Jl 6 0 0 0 c,:cf.) v) ccu n '' Cl) w V fV i. c c c c c c C c c c 0 '412' O a ..., o 2la �ulsst?W o 0 0 0 o s uaul 2aJ 0 0 0 0 a,o }4 HII M — 1 v .G A a U UI UOI�[?IJ�/� U U U U U U U U U c� U v �ape3ej v a� v �ooa a� a� (Li': v v o '� '*, (n cn In N VI (n Cl) Cl) Cl) (n cn N Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Table 3: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Applicability for Industrial Buildings Proposed Changes to Applicability and Design Standards for Industrial Buildings Section Current Standard Proposed Standard Applicability for industrial buildings Section B-Applicability by zoning and location(page 11) Section B.2.b-Architectural standards apply when On arterial or collector When located in Industrial zoning district and when located: road located on an arterial road • Where a proposed building's footprint would be located within 300 feet of the boundary of a Section B.2.c-Architectural Within 300 feet from residentially zoned district. standards apply when residentially zoned • Within 150 to 300 feet,the building shall be building footprint is: district required to comply with LDC sections 5.05.08 D.3., D.9., D.12., D.14., and E,and F.Compliance shall be limited to the building facades facing the residential district. Design standards for specific uses Section E.6-Design Standards for Warehousing/Distribution Buildings(page 48) • Primary façades and façades facing residential Section E.6.c-Variation in Primary façades and districts within 300 feet of a residential property line. massing required on façades facing residential • Between 150 and 300 feet from the property line: façades: districts only applies to facades facing residential zoning districts. Section E.7-Design Standards for Industrial/Factory Buildings(page 49) Section E.7.b.i Windows 25%of the façade area 20%of the façade area must cover a minimum of: • Primary façades and façades facing residential Section E.7.c-Variation in Primary façades and districts within 300 feet of a residential property line. massing required on facades facing residential • Between 150 and 300 feet from the property line: façades: districts only applies to facades facing residential zoning districts. Changes to submittal requirements: ` Old Section 5.05.08 C.5.a—Project standards/Submittal requirements (page 17) The building design treatments currently begin with section 5.05.08 C.5 and is titled "project standards," however, subsection C.5.a more accurately describes submittal requirements. This section is proposed to be relocated to proposed section 5.05.08 C and has been re-titled"submittal requirements." Additionally, since there are some instances when architectural drawings are only submitted with a building permit application, this section no longer identifies that architectural drawings should be submitted with site development plans or site improvement plans. Instead this section refers to the requirements in LDC section 10.02.03 and the Administrative Code. LDC section 5.05.08 C 1 C. Submittal requirements. An applicant shall submit architectural drawings according to 2 LDC section 10.02.03 and the Administrative Code Chapter 4.A. to comply with LDC 3 section 5.05.08. Architectural drawings must be signed and sealed by a licensed Architect 17 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2 Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 who is responsible for preparing the drawings, and who is registered in the state of Florida 2 as set forth in F.S. Chapter 481. 3 Changes to building design standards: The following common terms are defined below and used in the description of the proposed amendment: Design Feature = Primary façade design features in proposed LDC section 5.05.08 D.2. Design Treatment = Façade design treatments applicable to all façades in proposed LDC section 5.05.08 D.4. Design Element = Site design elements in proposed LDC section 5.05.08 F.1. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.1 —Building façades (page 21) Currently, the heading of this section includes the requirement that all façades must be designed with a consistent architectural style, detail, and trim features. This statement has been relocated in its entirety to subsection 5.05.08 D.l.a. Proposed Section 5.05.08 Dia—Building façades continued(page 21) Currently, this section requires that all exterior facades on buildings located on outparcels and freestanding buildings within a unified plan of development must adhere to the requirements of this section. This language repeats language in proposed LDC section 5.05.08 D.8.b.i - additional standards for outparcels and freestanding buildings within a PUD and common ownership developments. As a result,this statement is proposed to be deleted. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.1.c—Building façades continued(page 21) Currently,this section requires that buildings or projects located at the intersection of two or more arterial or collector roads must include design features which are intended to emphasize their location as gateways or transition points within the community. The section includes several examples of such design features such as corner towers, corner entrances, or other such features. The Committee proposes deleting this list of examples to provide additional flexibility when designing gateway and transition features. Old Section 5.05.08 C.2.b—Primary façade standards (page 22) Currently, this section requires that primary facades on the ground floor must have features along 50 percent of their horizontal length. The Committee proposes to delete this section from the text. The Committee relayed that the intent of this requirement is captured through the combination of the required design features and treatments and is therefore redundant. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b. —Primary façade design features (page 22) This section requires a minimum of two design features on primary façades. The current list of potential design features includes five potential options. The Committee is proposing changes to the existing options and to add seven options as detailed in the following sections. Additionally, the Committee proposes to require a minimum of only one design feature for buildings less than 5,000 square feet. 18 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.i—Primary facade design features (page 22) Currently, this option requires a minimum of 30 percent of the primary façade area consisting of window and glazed door openings. The Committee proposes the minimum is amended to 25 percent and further clarifies that the standard is to be applied to the exterior primary façade area and not any facades in interior courtyards. The Committee determined that with the other design standards to choose from, the 30 percent standard is excessive for buildings of all sizes. Furthermore, the Committee proposes to add a provision in LDC section 5.05.08 D.2.b.i.a which allows for up to 50 percent of the window area to be substituted with trellises or latticework. This option also outlines the planting area and opacity requirements required to qualify the trellis or latticework as a primary façade element. The planting and opacity requirements are based on LDC section 5.03.02 regarding planting requirements for fences and walls. This feature is proposed because it allows an alternative to the glazing requirement. This alternative is currently an option that is allowed and is utilized by buildings within PUDs. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.ii—Primary façade design features (page 22) Currently, this option requires that a minimum of 20 percent of the recessed covered entrance is devoted to windows and glazed door openings. The proposed change is to reduce the percentage to 15 percent. The Committee determined that with the other design standards to choose from, requiring 20 percent in this standard is excessive for buildings of all sizes. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.iii—Primary facade design features (page 22) The Committee proposes the addition of a new design feature option that allows for a covered entrance with a minimum horizontal dimension of sixteen feet and a minimum area of 200 square feet. Additionally,this section requires glazing on a minimum of 15 percent of the primary façade area. This standard was added to allow for more variability among options for primary façades. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.iv—Primary facade design features (page 22) Currently, this option states that a permanent covered walkway or arcade must be 8 feet wide and the total length must measure 60 percent of the length of the associated façade. The Committee proposes to reduce the required length to 40 percent of the length of the associated façade because the prior percentage was too great given the number of other façade requirements and is based on the experience of applying the 60 percent standard to projects. Additionally, this design feature would require a minimum of 15 percent glazing on the primary façade. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.v—Primary facade design features (page 22) Another new design standard option is proposed to include awnings over window or doors as a design feature. This section allows applicants to utilize awnings both over windows and in a creative style where they may be placed in locations absent of windows. Additionally, this section requires glazing on a minimum of 15 percent of the primary façade area. Examples of the use of awnings over ornamental design features can be seen in Figure 1 below. 19 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term -- Figure 1: Examples of awnings over ornamental design features. NI , d s.c., ...*` -- ► 4 „Li • p , , , . , — * Photo credit: Google Maps -- _ Photo credit: Staff Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.vi—Primary facade design features (page 22) /''"N Currently,this option requires a porte-cochere to have a minimum horizontal dimension of 18 feet and 20 percent of the primary façade area must be devoted to windows or glazed door openings. The Committee proposes to reduce the minimum glazing requirement to 15 percent. They determined that the 20 percent glazing requirement combined with one of the other design elements is excessive in application on a single primary façade. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.vii—.Primary façade design features (page 22) Currently, this option requires that if a tower element is utilized there must also be 20 percent of the façade dedicated to windows and glazed door openings. The Committee proposes to reduce this standard to 15 percent to be consistent with the window and glazing requirements in the accompanying options. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.viii—Primary façade design features (page 23) The Committee is proposing to add another design feature option that allows trellis or latticework covering a minimum of 15 percent of the primary facade. This option also outlines the planting area and opacity requirements required for the trellis or latticework to qualify as a primary façade element. The planting and opacity requirements are based on LDC section 5.03.02 regarding planting requirements for fences and walls. This feature is proposed because it allows an alternative to the glazing requirement. Further,this alternative is currently an option that is allowed and is utilized by buildings within PUDs. This feature cannot be used with the alternative design feature in LDC section 5.05.08 D.2.b.i.a. n 20 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.ix—Primary façade design features (page 23) The Committee is proposing to add the option of a 200 square foot entry plaza that includes seating and is connected to the primary façade. A minimum of 15 percent glazing is also required by this section. The Committee relayed that this element adds a welcoming feature to the primary façade and is the only option that gives credit for seating. Staff notes: This primary façade design feature could also qualify as one of the two required site design elements found in proposed section 5.05.08 F.1.a. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.x—Primary façade design features (page 23) The Committee is proposing to add an elevated entry to the options for primary façade design features. The elevated entry would be required to be 400 square feet in area, 16 inches above the primary finished floor of the building, and to be adjacent or connected to the building face. Additionally, this design feature would require a minimum of 15 percent glazing on the primary façade. The Committee relayed that this feature would allow for grand features to be recognized as an option for credit. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.xi—Primary façade design features (page 23) The Committee is proposing to add an entry courtyard as a new design feature. This option would require the courtyard to be contiguous with the building entry and connected to the primary façade. It must also have a defined space of at least 650 square feet consisting of any combination of hard or softscape with walkways, a defined hard edge, decorative fencing, or a minimum low 4 foot wall(s). Additionally, this design feature would require a minimum of 15 percent glazing on the primary façade. The Committee relayed that this change provides increased design flexibility and incorporates language from the PUD requirements. 1 LDC section 5.05.08 D. 2 CD. Building design standards. 3 1. Building Pagades. The following standards apply to all buildings that are 4 subject to LDC section 5.05.08, except as noted. All façades of a building must 5 be designed with consistent architectural style, detail and trim features. 6 a. All facades of a building must be designed with consistent architectural 7 style, detail, and trim features. 8 a. In case of buildings located on outparccls, and freestanding buildings 9 10 -_ _" ----- - - - - - -- - -11 treatments for primary façades. (See Section 5.05.08 C.9. Outparcels and 12 freestanding buildings within PUD and common ownership developments 13 for additional design standards). 14 b. For additional design standards, see LDC section 5.05.08 D.B. 15 Outparcels and freestanding buildings within a PUD or unified plan of 16 development. 17 lac. Buildings or projects located at the intersection of two or more arterial or 18 collector roads shall include design features, such as corner towers 19 corner entrances, or other such features, to emphasize their location as 20 gateways and transition points within the community. 21 2. Primary façade standards. 21 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 a. Building entrance. Buildings located along a public or private street 2 must be designed with the main entrance clearly defined, and with 3 convenient access from both parking and the street. 4 b. Ground floor. Primary façades on the ground floor must have features 5 along a minimum of 50 percent of their horizontal length. These features 6 • - - -- - - •• - -- ; - - -- • ; - ; - 7 other similar design elements. 8 cb. Design features. The design of primary façades must include, at a 9 minimum, two of the following design features. However, a minimum of 10 one of the following design features is required for buildings less than 11 5,000 square feet. For mixed use development projects within C-1 12 through C-3 zoning districts, see LDC section 4.02.38 1.1.d for additional 13 options.- 14 i. Glazing covering a minimum of 3025 percent of the primary 15 façade area, consisting of window and glazed door openings. 16 a) Alternative. Trellis or latticework on the primary facade 17 used as a support for climbing plants may count for up to 18 50 percent of the window area on primary facades. The 19 planting area shall be an irrigated bed 3 feet in depth and a 20 minimum width equal to the width of the trellis with 3 gallon 21 vines at 3 feet on center at time of installation. Climbing 22 plants shall achieve 80 percent opacity on the trellis within 23 one year. 24 ii. Projected or recessed covered entrance public entry providing a 25 minimum horizontal dimension of eight feet and a minimum area 26 of 100 square feet. In addition, a minimum of 2015 percent of the 27 primary façade area must be devoted to windows and glazed 28 door openings. 29 iii. Covered entrance with a minimum horizontal dimension of 16 feet 30 and a minimum area of 200 square feet. In addition, a minimum of 31 15 percent of the primary facade area must be devoted to 32 window and/or glazed door openings. 33 +++iv. Covered walkway, or arcade (excluding canvas type) constructed 34 with columns at least 12 inches wide, attached to the building, or 35 located no more than 12 feet from the building. The structure 36 must be permanent and its design must relate to the principal 37 structure. The minimum width must be eight feet, with a total 38 length measuring 6040 percent of the length of the associated 39 façade. In addition, a minimum of 15 percent of the primary 40 facade area must be devoted to window and/or glazed door 41 openings. 42 v. Awnings located over doors, windows, or other ornamental 43 design features projecting a minimum of 2 feet from the facade 44 wall and a width totaling a minimum of 40 percent of the facade 45 length. In addition, a minimum of 15 percent of the primary 46 facade area must be devoted to window and/or glazed door 47 openings. 48 +vi. Porte-cochere with a minimum horizontal dimension of 18 feet. In 49 addition, a minimum of 2015 percent of the primary façade area 50 must be devoted to windows and glazed door openings. 22 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 vii. A tower element such as but not limited to a clock or bell tower 2 element. In addition, a minimum of 2015 percent of the primary 3 façade area must be devoted to windows and glazed door 4 openings. 5 viii. Trellis or latticework covering a minimum of 15 percent of the 6 primary facade and used as a support for climbing plants. The 7 planting area shall be an irrigated bed 3 feet in depth and a 8 minimum width of the trellis with 3 gallon vines at 3 feet on center 9 at time of installation and climbing plants shall achieve 80 percent 10 opacity on the trellis within one year. This provision shall not be 11 utilized with the alternative design feature identified in LDC section 12 5.05.08 D.2.b.i.a. 13 ix. Entry plaza to the building with a minimum 200 square feet in 14 area that includes seating. In addition, a minimum of 15 percent of 15 the primary facade area must be devoted to window and/or 16 glazed door openings. 17 x. Elevated entry a minimum of 16 inches in elevation above the 18 primary finished floor of the building adjacent or connected to the 19 building facade and a minimum of 400 square feet in area. The 20 area calculation may include interior and exterior spaces of raised 21 surface with not more than 50 percent of interior area. In addition, 22 a minimum of 15 percent of the primary facade area must be 23 devoted to window and/or glazed door openings. 24 xi. Entry courtyard contiguous with the building entry and connected 25 to the primary facade consisting of a defined space with a 26 minimum area of 650 square feet. The courtyard may be any 27 combination of hard or softscape with walkways and defined hard 28 edge, decorative fencing, or a minimum 4 foot wall(s). In addition, 29 a minimum of 15 percent of the primary facade area must be 30 devoted to window and/or glazed door openings. Committee proposed changes to old section 5.05.08 C.3 —Facade/wall height transition elements: Old Section 5.05.08 C.3 -Facade/wall height transition elements (page 24) LDC section 5.05.08 C.3 currently provides for facade/wall height transition elements. The intent of these standards is to ensure that buildings relate in mass and size to the adjacent built environment and streetscape. The section currently applies to all buildings that are at least twice the height of any building within 150 feet. These transitional elements can include wall plane changes,roofs, canopies,colonnades,balconies with minimum depths for projections and recesses in coordination with the building size. The Committee is proposing to eliminate this section of the code entirely. The Committee noted that the requirements for canopies, porte-cocheres, and other design elements would provide for transitional elements. The Committee also explained that as the county redevelops, buildings will need to be built higher and will be near smaller buildings, therefore, retaining this provision could negatively impact redevelopment. The Committee also explained that when buildings are required to match the scale of a nearby building, including residential buildings which could be redeveloped in the future, this could result in a requirement for transition elements to a building scale that no longer exists. Further, they stated this concept does not work in a dynamic community. Finally,the Committee stated that building design should 23 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term account for pedestrian or a human scale rather than provide transitional elements based on the surrounding environment. The Committee's proposed change is as follows: 3. Facade/wall height transition elements. environment b. Applicability. Transitional massing elements must be provided on proposed buildings that are twice the height or more of any existing building within 150 feet, as measured from the edge of the proposed building. c. Design standards. Transitional massing elements can be no more than 100 percent taller than the average height of the adjacent buildings, but no more than 30 ii. Transitional massing elements must be incorporated for a minimum of 60% of the length of the façade, which is in part or whole within the 150 feet of an existing building. iii. Transitional massing elements include, but arc not limited to, wall plane architectural features, with the minimum depth for projections and requirements: a) For buildings /10,000 square feet or larger-in--gross building area, projections and recesses must have a minimum depth of ten feet. b) For buildings between 20,000 and 39,999 square feet in gross building area, projections and recesses must have a minimum depth of eight feet. c) For buildings between 10,000 and 19,999 square feet in gross building area, projections and recesses-must have a minimum depth of six feet. d) For buildings up to 9,999 square feet in gross building area, projections and recesses must have a minimum depth of four feet. Staff notes: This section provides a gradual visual relief from buildings of different heights in close proximity to one another. The proposed change will allow buildings twice the height, or greater, of buildings within 150 feet which may create buildings that appear out of scale with surrounding uses. The intended effect of the current section is demonstrated in Figure 2. 24 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Figure 2: Illustratr______ _ion depicting facade/wall height transitions { I S :.,„..,,,„,,,,,4,..,„,,,.,....„......._ xr ....... T.P,'_. , 4,ky'/'1,k. r) af 1:7 ,-11 '. ,/,..,i 0,4 2 ,i! il-:tr. ;..,'.'. it : ‘- er ,py I i 1 ' rib tr'2.,��f(,.vfirJ r—' 4.:,,,5:41:-;.�,% fir,f>�,.:Ja�'/�• //7 fir✓!: 'rte 4 iii': Image credit: Staff CCPC proposed changes to old LDC section 5.05.08 C.3 The Planning Commission recommends retaining the existing language requiring facade/wall height transition elements for the following reasons: • The Planning Commission suggested that massing is an important component that helps maintain building proportions throughout the community, especially in communities that are transitioning from old to new buildings. • Additionally, this section has been successful at breaking up the massing of big buildings next to small buildings and this section may play a part in the existing attractive building transitions throughout the community. • County staff also explained that this section has not caused any problems for existing buildings as staff reported that all buildings have been able tO meet the requirements. • Finally, the Planning Commission suggested that the proposed infill and redevelopment code is a more appropriate method to address any problems or concerns with redevelopment projects with regard to this section. Note: The Planning Commission's recommendation is represented in the amendment text. If the Planning Commission's recommendation is selected, the sections that follow, and all cross- references, will be renumbered accordingly. LDC Section 5.05.08 D.X 1 3. Facade/wall height transition elements. 2 a. Purpose. The intent of this section is to ensure that the proposed buildings 3 relate in mass and scale to the immediate streetscape and the adjacent built 4 environment. 25 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 b. Applicability. Transitional massing elements must be provided on proposed 2 buildings that are twice the height or more of any existing building within 150 3 feet, as measured from the edge of the proposed building. 4 c. Design standards. 5 i. Transitional massing elements can be no more than 100 percent taller 6 than the average height of the adjacent buildings, but no more than 30 7 feet, and no less than ten feet above the existing grade. 8 ii. Transitional massing elements must be incorporated for a minimum of 9 60% of the length of the facade, which is in part or whole within the 150 10 feet of an existing building. 11 iii. Transitional massing elements include, but are not limited to, wall plane 12 changes, roofs, canopies, colonnades, balconies, other similar 13 architectural features, with the minimum depth for projections and 14 recesses relative to the building size, and must meet the following 15 requirements: 16 a) For buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross building area, 17 projections and recesses must have a minimum depth of ten feet. 18 b) For buildings between 20,000 and 39,999 square feet in gross 19 building area, projections and recesses must have a minimum 20 depth of eight feet. 21 c) For buildings between 10,000 and 19,999 square feet in gross 22 building area, projections and recesses must have a minimum 23 depth of six feet. 24 d) For buildings up to 9,999 square feet in gross building area, 25 projections and recesses must have a minimum depth of four feet. / Description of changes to Variation in Massing OVERVIEW of Section 5.05.08 D.3— Variation in massing (page 28) This section requires variation in building massing in order to avoid a single, large, dominant building mass. These variations are required to be integral to the structure and not merely for cosmetic effect. The Committee has revised the following sections with the view that the massing requirements are best suited for larger big box stores in order to help break up the bulk of the structure and make the building more visually appealing. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.3.a.i-iv— Variation in massing continued(page 28) Currently, these sections require projections and recesses based on the size of the building. For each category of building,the Committee proposes to reduce the minimum depth of the projections and recesses by two feet for all buildings with less than 20,000 square feet. The Committee originally proposed to remove this standard for all buildings with less than 20,000 square feet,but in response to the Planning Commission's suggestion to retain the original language, instead proposed only to remove only the standard for buildings with less than 5,000 square feet and to decrease the minimum depths of projections and recesses for each building category. It was determined that the required depths of projections and recesses are too severe for smaller buildings. The Committee determined that reducing this standard would not be detrimental to the general aesthetic quality because this is a requirement in excess of the primary façade requirements for all buildings subject to architectural standards. J 26 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Bold text indicates a defined term Committee proposed changes to old section 5.05.08 C.3 —Variation in massing: Proposed Sections 5.05.08 D.3.a.v— Variation in massing continued(page 28) Currently, these three sections establish standards for variation in massing for buildings with less than 5,000 square feet. The Committee proposes to eliminate the projection and recess requirements for buildings less than 5,000 square feet. The Committee determined that smaller buildings generally already include these features. The Committee also believes that 5,000 square foot buildings are small enough that projections and recesses are not needed. The Committee's proposed language is as follows: v. For buildings less than 5,000 square feet in gross building area, a Staff notes:Removing these sections means that variation in massing will no longer apply to buildings with less than 5,000 square feet. While smaller buildings could voluntarily include these features, the proposed change would allow these buildings to have flat walls and a single dominant mass. Examples of buildings which are typically smaller than 5,000 square feet are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3. Examples of building types which are typically less than 5,000 square feet. Buildings Constructed After Adoption of 2004 Architectural Standards �►�� '1 , Photo credit: Google Maps Photo credit: Google Maps Steak 'n Shake= 3,400 sq ft AmSouth/Regions Bank= 3,820 sq ft Year built: 2005 Year built: 2007 1.11411r . Photo credit: Google Maps McDonalds = 3,678 sq ft Year built: 2010 27 1:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term CCPC proposed changes to LDC section 5.05.08 D.3 –Variation in massing While the Planning Commission agreed that the minimum depth of projections and recesses could be reduced, the Planning Commission recommends retaining the requirement for projections and recesses for all building sizes for the following reasons: • The Planning Commission expressed concern about blank walls on buildings, including for small buildings. • The Planning Commission explained that even a small building design could include long building facades which should be broken up with projections or recesses. • The Planning Commission indicated that retaining this language ensures that all buildings incorporate articulation and do not negatively affect the community's architectural style. • Additionally, the Planning Commission stated that this provision is not intended to hinder good design but to protect the community from poorly designed buildings through minimum standards. The Planning Commission's recommendation is represented in the amendment text. LDC Section 5.05.08 D.3. 1 43. Variation in massing. A single, large, dominant building mass must be avoided. 2 Changes in mass must be related to entrances, the integral structure and the 3 organization of interior spaces and activities, and not merely for cosmetic effect. False 4 fronts or parapets create insubstantial appearance and are discouraged. All façades, 5 excluding courtyard area, shall be designed to employ the design treatments listed — 6 below. 7 a. Projections and recesses. 8 i. For buildings 40,000 square feet or larger in gross building areafloor 9 area, a maximum length, or uninterrupted curve of any façade, at any 10 point, must be 150 linear feet. Projections and recesses must have a 11 minimum depth of ten feet within the 150 linear feet limitation. 12 ii. For buildings between 20,000 and 39,999 square feet in grass building 13 areafloor area, a maximum length, or uninterrupted curve of any façade, 14 at any point, must be 125 linear feet. Projections and recesses must have 15 a minimum depth of cight six feet within the 125 linear feet limitation. 16 iii. For buildings between 10,000 and 19,999 square feet in gross building 17 ar afloor area, a maximum length, or uninterrupted curve of any facade, 18 at any point, must be 100 linear feet. Projections and recesses must have 19 a minimum depth of s+xfour feet within the 100 linear feet limitation. 20 iv. For buildings between 5,000 and 9,999 square feet in gross building 21 areafloor area, a maximum length, or uninterrupted curve of any facade, 22 at any point, must be 75 linear feet. Projections and recesses must have a 23 minimum depth of fe-urtwo feet within the 75 linear feet limitation. 24 v. For buildings less than 5,000 square feet in gross building ar °floor area, 25 a maximum length, or uninterrupted curve of any façade, at any point, must 26 be 50 linear feet. Projections and recesses must have a minimum depth of 27 three feet 1.5 feet, and a minimum total width of 20 percent of the facade 28 length. 28 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2Wrchitectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1111111111111 4411111141114*111 r egt 4, 1 2 Illustration 5.05.08 C.4.a. 1D.3.a— Measurement of projections and recesses 3 b. Wall plane changes. 4 i. Buildings subject to the projections or recesses depths required 5 by LDC section 5.05.08.C-4D.3.a must not have a single wall 6 plane exceeding 60 percent of each façade. 7 ii. If a building has a projection or recess of 40 feet or more, each is 8 considered a separate façade, and must meet the abovc 9 requirements for wall plane changes in LDC section 5.05.08 10 D.3.b.i. 40. 11 12 Illustration 5.05.08 C.4.b. ID.3.b— Wall plane percentages 13 29 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2Wrchitectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term cChanges to building design treatments Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.4—Building design treatments (page 30) This section is proposed to be reorganized and renumbered and as a result will be re-titled "Building design treatments." The proposed description regarding this section has been relocated from a stand-alone section that described detail features, old section 5.05.08 C.8.a, in its entirety. As a result, this proposed section requires that building design treatments (which are listed in sections 5.05.08 D.4.a-v) "must be an integral part of the building's design..." and, "must not consist solely of applied graphics or paint." Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.4.t—Building design treatments continued(page 31) This section is proposed to be revised to correct a scrivener's error and to clarify that solar shading devices may count as building design treatments when they extend a minimum of 50 percent of the length of the building facade and not when they cover or shade 50 percent of the building. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.4.u—Building design treatments continued(page 31) Currently,this section provides translucent glazing as a menu option for building design treatments if it exceeds the minimum required glazing. The Committee is proposing to decrease the requirement from 15 to 10 percent beyond the minimum glazing requirement. The Committee determined 15 percent beyond the code requirement is too high and therefore it was excessive as an additional option. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.4.v—Building design treatments continued(page 31) Currently, this section provides glass block as a menu option for building design treatments if it exceeds the minimum required glazing by 15 percent. The Committee re-iterated the purpose of the architectural and site design standards is to regulate the "look" of buildings not the actual construction techniques. The Committee proposes to decrease the requirement from 15 to 10 percent beyond the minimum glazing requirement. The Committee determined 15 percent was excessive as an additional option. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.4.w—Building design treatments continued(page 31) The Committee proposes adding this new building design treatment to provide an incentive for the use of bird-safe glazing materials. This building design treatment option could be utilized if the optional design feature in LDC Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.i is chosen and at least 85 percent of all exterior glazing on the first three stories of the building incorporates one of four potential bird- safe glazing techniques. This treatment was added to address public comments from the Conservancy of Southwest Florida requesting the addition of standards to reduce bird mortalities due to collisions with buildings. 1 1 54. Project Standards. 2 - - - "- - - - - - - - . . . 3 plan or site improvemcnt plan according to LDC section 10.02.03 and the 4 Administrative Code to comply with LDC 5.05.08. Architectural drawings 5 must be signed and sealed by a-licensed Architect who is responsible for 6 preparing the drawings, and who is registered in the state of Florida as 7 - - -- " 30 1:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text.strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 b. Building design treatments. The following design treatments must be an 2 integral part of the building's design and integrated into the overall 3 architectural style. These treatments must not consist solely of applied 4 graphics or paint. Each building facade must have at least four of the 5 following building design treatments. However, a minimum of two of the 6 following design treatments are required for buildings less than 5,000 7 square feet: 8 +a. Canopies, porticos, or porte-cocheres, integrated with the building's 9 massing and style, 10 iib. Overhangs, minimum of three feet, 11 +i+c. Colonnades or arcades, a minimum of eight feet clear in width, 12 +ud. Sculptured artwork, 13 ue. Cornice minimum two feet high with 12 inch projection, 14 4f. Peaked or curved roof forms, 15 vi4g. Arches with a minimum 12-inch recess depth, 16 vi1ih. Display windows, 17 ixi. Ornamental and structural architectural details, other than cornices, which 18 are integrated into the building structure and overall design, 19 xj. Clock or bell tower, or other such roof treatment (i.e. dormers, 20 belvederes, and cupolas), 21 xik. Projected and covered entry, with minimum dimension of eight feet and 22 the minimum area of 100 square feet, 23 xi+l. Emphasized building base, minimum of three feet high, with a minimum 24 projection from the wall of two inches, 25 xii+m. Additional roof articulation above the minimum standards, 26 xivn. Curved walls, 27 xvo. Columns, 28 4(-4,42. Pilasters, or 29 xviig. Metal or tile roof material. 30 xv++ir. Expressed or exposed structural elements. 31 xixs. Additional glazing at a minimum of 15 percent% beyond the code 32 minimum requirement. 33 xxt. Solar shading devises devices (excluding awnings) that cover extend a 34 minimum of 50 percent% of the length of the building façade. 35 xxiu. Translucent glazing at a minimum of 410 percent beyond the code 36 minimum glazing requirement. 37 xxiiv. Glass block at a minimum of 4-5° 10 percent beyond the code minimum 38 glazing requirement. 39 w. Where the optional design feature in LDC Section 5.05.08 D.2.b.i is 40 chosen and 85 percent of all exterior glazing within the first three stories 41 of the building have any of the following: 42 i. Low reflectance, opaque glazing materials (may include spandrel 43 glass with less than 15 percent reflectance); 44 ii. Glass with visual patterns consisting of opaque points or patterns 45 etched into or applied to the exterior or interior surfaces with frit, 46 frost, or film for single pane or insulated glass. A maximum of 2 47 inch spacing between horizontal elements and a maximum of 4 48 inch spacing between vertical elements, with a minimum line or 49 dot diameter thickness of 1/8 inch; 50 iii. Glass with continuous etch or continuous frit on interior surface, 51 single pane, or insulated glass; or 31 1:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text etrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term n 1 iv. External screens. c. Changes to other design criteria: Old Section 5.05.08 C.5.c -Site design elements (page 36) Currently,LDC section 5.05.08 C.5—project standards includes building design standards and site design elements. The Committee proposes to move the site design elements section to Proposed LDC section 5.05.08 F— Site Design Standards. It was determined that it made the most sense to keep all of the site design elements together. This will help make the architectural section more user friendly for the applicants. See discussion regarding proposed LDC section 5.05.08 F. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.5—Blank wall area standards (page 36) The Committee proposes to relocate the blank wall areas provision from the old section 5.05.08 C.8.b to this section to improve readability of the building design treatment standards. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.6.a-b— Window standards (page 37) This section currently states that windows must not be false or applied. The Committee proposes to allow for false windows, however, false windows shall not be included in the required glazing for primary facades. Further, the Committee proposes to allow for spandrel panels in curtain wall assemblies to be included in the minimum glazing requirement for primary facades. The Committee relayed that even though spandrel glass does not function as regular glass,it looks like glass and should be allowed to count toward minimum glazing requirements. Public comments regarding this section supported the Committee's change to allow spandrel panels to count toward minimum glazing requirements. Examples of false windows and spandrel panels are demonstrated in Figures 4 and 5. Figure 4: Example of False Windows from Naples,FL. 111 Photo credit: Google Maps 32 1:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Figure 5: Example of Spandrel Panels from Southfield, MI. .. 0 , , , ..... .„ ._,„__,,,,=:_„::: -1: _ _ - Photo credit:www.obe.com Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.7—Overhead door standards (Page 37) This section currently allows overhead doors on primary façades only when sufficient screening is proposed. The Committee proposes to revise this section for clarity, to provide a maximum screen wall height of 6 feet, and to allow an exception from screening requirements for overhead glass doors with a minimum of 75 percent transparent glazing except when used on loading docks or receiving areas (transparent defined: allowing light to pass through so that object behind can be distinctly seen).In some instances,like restaurants and fire stations,buildings utilize transparent glazing on overhead doors as amenities but this section requires screening for all overhead doors. Providing an exemption from screening requirements in these cases would codify existing interpretations of this section and would allow the use of glass overhead doors except in the case of loading docks and self-storage buildings. Old Section 5.05.08 C.8.a—Detail features (page 37) The Committee proposes to relocate this section to proposed section 5.05.08 D.4. Old Section 5.05.08 C.8.b (page 37) The Committee proposes to relocate this section to proposed section 5.05.08 D.5. Proposed Sections 5.05.08 D.8.a-b—Standards for outparcels and freestanding buildings within a PUD or unified plan of development (page 37) These sections establish additional standards for outparcels and freestanding buildings within a PUD and common ownership developments including façade standards and other design standards. Changes to these sections clarify and revise cross-references to other LDC sections. Additionally, the Committee received public comments regarding the requirement in this section that all facades must meet the primary façade design standards for outparcels and freestanding buildings within a PUD. Specifically, it was requested that the Committee consider reducing the number of required primary facades on a freestanding building in a PUD, however,no action was taken by the Committee. 33 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.8.c—Common design elements for freestanding buildings (page 38) Currently,this section includes design standards for freestanding buildings which require common design elements throughout the site. The Committee received comments from the public which indicated that this section requires that"all freestanding buildings must provide for vehicular and pedestrian interconnection between adjacent outparcels or freestanding sites and the primary structure." Public comments indicated that this requirement addresses traffic issues, not aesthetic criteria and are already addressed in other sections of the LDC. Moreover, it was stated that PUDs generally provide access roadways interior to the PUD which serves as interconnection. Instead, it was stated that this additional requirement increases impervious areas and stormwater treatment requirements and creates a liability issue for individual landowners granting easements between outparcels.The Committee also identified that the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)requires that each building is connected to the perimeter sidewalk. Therefore, pedestrians can travel on sidewalks to get from one building to another building by using the perimeter pathway. Alternatively, pedestrians may use drive aisles and parking areas for interconnection between buildings. After discussion with the Planning Commission the Committee has proposed a modification to this requirement so that the interconnection is only required "between abutting outparcels or freestanding sites and the primary structure." This means that pedestrian interconnection is only required when two outparcels or freestanding sites share a common property line or boundary. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.8.d—Blank wall area standards (page 38) This section includes additional options which can be used to meet the primary façade design feature requirements for outparcels and freestanding buildings within a PUD and common ownership developments.The Committee proposes to revise this section for clarity as the provision in section 5.05.08 D.8.d.ii allows trellis or latticework plant coverage area to count as window area. Since the Committee proposes to allow this as a design treatment on any building in proposed section 5.05.08 D.2.b, it is not necessary here. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.9.b.i—Roof treatment standards (page 38) This section currently requires buildings larger than 5,000 square feet in gross area must have two vertical roof-edge or parapet line changes. The Committee's consensus was that this does not provide architectural benefit for smaller buildings and on many smaller buildings begins to look forced. The Committee stated that applying this provision to small buildings adds additional cost to a project.The Committee also relayed that the requirement does not provide architectural benefit for smaller buildings and can look forced. The Committee proposes to change this standard to allow for the use of either vertical or horizontal roof-edge or parapet line changes in order to provide design flexibility while still providing roofline changes. This proposed standard is based on the standards for gas station canopies in LDC section 5.05.05. The intended effect of requiring roof-edge or parapet line changes is depicted in Figure 6. 34 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Bold text indicates a defined term Figure 6: Illustration depicting roof-edge or parapet line changes.Mlik4-401.-.14difill#01-- r "._.r, 4 _142- - Ni•- ii' it- ki-0,- --- __ - ---- I _� ... �. i ,► k git ' i auoicaswwimmin ' _ _ _4111 A -,044* ..• 1. A- A , Image credit: Staff Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.9.c.i—Roof treatment standards continued(page 39) This section currently states that the average height of parapets must not exceed 15 percent of the height of the supporting wall. The Committee proposes to change this standard to 20 percent. This change will allow for larger parapets. Figure 7 provides an example of a parapet for informational purposes. Figure 7: Parapet example in elevation view. Parapet 1 1 is 1.P 4 �fl _, . . -�.!^41-.! ' ,-':- Mr.: � -'—'1;;;:3;•:-.41,4,..* ..;.+iRE�s*i'+y**el�tr,+ .#.e.f...rwp.. .} ;i r - LEFT ELEVATION Photo credit:Recent SDP application Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.10.b.ii—Awning standards (page 40) Currently, awnings must be located above windows or doors. The Committee proposes to also allow awnings over "other ornamental design features." The Committee relays the awnings will -- 35 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Bold text indicates a defined term be an extension of a decorative feature. Examples of the use of awnings over ornamental design features can be seen in Figure 1 above. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.11.b.ii—Entryway/customer entrance treatment standards (page 41) Currently, this section states the front entry on single-tenant buildings must be set back from a drive or parking area by a minimum distance of 15 feet. The Committee is proposing to reduce this distance to 10 feet. It was determined that the current distance is difficult to comply for properties with larger buildings located on smaller properties. This requirement makes parking difficult on the project as they must reduce the number of parking spaces that can be provided in order to comply. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.11.c.ii—Entryway/customer entrance treatment standards continued (page 41) Currently, this section states that multiple-tenant buildings and developments must provide a shaded outdoor community space. The Committee proposes that a single community space could be broken up into multiple small spaces, each with a minimum area of 75 square feet, as long as the total area of all shaded outdoor community spaces meets the existing standard. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.11.c.iii—Entryway/customer entrance treatment standards continued (page 41) Currently, the front entries of multiple-tenant buildings and developments are also required to provide a 15 foot setback from a drive or parking area. The Committee proposes to change this distance to 10 feet. It was determined that the current distance is difficult to comply for properties with larger buildings located on smaller properties. This requirement makes parking difficult on the project, as they must use potential parking spaces for landscaping in order to comply. Proposed Section 5.05.08 D.12—Materials and colors standards (page 41) Currently, the architectural standards prohibit the use of neon tubing in the materials and colors standards in proposed LDC section 5.05.08 C.12.d. This prohibition is proposed to be relocated to a new LDC section 5.05.08 D.14 for clarity. No other changes are proposed in this section. 1 - 2 fallowing: 3 i. Decorative landscape planters or planting areas, a minimum of 4 -- - - - - -- - 5 minimum of 100 square feet; 6 ii. Integration of specialty payers, or stamped concrete along the 7 building perimeter walkway. This treatment must constitute a 8 9 ... • 10 code requirements, for every 100 feet of the front facade and a 11 minimum of two for the rest of the project with a minimum height 12 of 18 feet at planting; or 13 iv. Site sculptures. 14 5. Blank wall areas on buildings with primary facades. Blank, opaque, wall areas 15 must not exceed 10 feet in the vertical direction or 20 feet in the horizontal 16 direction of any primary facade. Facades connected to a primary facade shall 17 be a minimum of 33 percent of the attached facades. Control and expansion 36 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2Wrchitectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 joints are considered blank wall area unless used as a decorative pattern and 2 spaced at intervals 120 square feet per panel or less. The relief and reveal work 3 must be a minimum depth of/z inch, and a minimum width of 1% inch and may 4 be of a color that contrasts with the color of the wall. 5 6. Window standards. 6 a. Windows must not be false or applied. False or applied windows are 7 allowed but shall not be included in the glazing required for primary 8 facades. 9 b. Spandrel panels in curtain wall assembliesy are allowed and but may not 10 shall be included in the minimum glazing required for primary façades. 11 7. Overhead doors. Adequate screening shall be provided for overhead doors 12 located on primary facades. The placement and length of the screening must 13 block the view of the overhead doors from the street. 14 a. Required screening. Overhead doors must not be located on the primary 15 façades, unless sufficient screening is proposed. Sufficient screening is 16 defined as One of the following screening methods shall be provided: 17 i. a screening wall, with a minimum height of 6 feet measured from 18 the centerline of the adjacent roadway90 percent of the overhead 19 door height, or 20 ii. a landscape buffer achieving 75 percent opacity within one year. 21 The placement and the length of these screening devices must 22 block the view of the overhead doors from the street. 23 b. Exception. Overhead doors utilizing framed transparent glass panels 24 covering a minimum of 75 percent of the door area shall be allowed on 25 primary facades without the screening required in LDC section 5.05.08 26 D.7.a., except when used on loading docks or receiving areas. 27 lac. Facades with overhead dDoors facing one another. Overhead doors 28 facing one another may be treated as interior space, provided that: 29 i. tThe buildings meet all other requirements of LDC Ssection 30 5.05.08. of this code,; and 31 ii. tThe distance between the doors facing one another is no greater 32 than 50 feet; and 33 iii. tThe view of the all overhead doors is properly screened from the 34 street. 35 8. Detail features. 36 a. The design elements in the following standards must be an integral part 37 38 - - ----- - - -- - " - --- - - - - - -- - 39 b. Blank wall areas. Blank, opaque wall areas must not exceed ten feet in 40 -- - - - ! -- - - - - - - - - - - 41 ---- - ----- -- - - - --- - - -- - - 42 •• - • - ' - -- - -- --- -• - - -- 43 - • - " -- - - - - - - - - -- - - _- - - 44 and spaced at intervals 120 square feet per panel or lens. The depth of 45 the relief and reveal work must be a minimum of inch, and a minimum 46 - • - ' - - - -e - - - -- - - -- - • - -- -- - - -- 47 wall 48 38. Additional standards for 8outparcels and freestanding buildings within a PUD 49 and common ownership developments or unified plan of development. See LDC 50 section 2.03.06 G for additional design criteria in Residential Mixed Use 51 Neighborhood Center PUDs. 37 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 a. Purpose and intent. To provide unified architectural design and site 2 planning for all on-site structures, and to provide for safe and convenient 3 vehicular and pedestrian access and movement within the site. 4 b. Façades standards. All facades must meet the requirements of LDC 5 section C.5. Project standards.D.4. Building design treatments. 6 i. Primary façades. All exterior facades of freestanding structures, 7 including structures located on outparcels, are considered 8 primary façades and must meet the requirements of this section 9 with respect to the architectural design treatment for primary 10 façades— in LDC section 5.05.08 C.2.D.2., except for those 11 facades considered secondary facades. 12 ii. Secondary façades. One facade of a freestanding structure, 13 including structures located on outparcels, that is internal to the 14 site and that does not abut or face public or private streets 15 adjacent to the development. Outparcels and freestanding 16 buildings are allowed one secondary façade. 17 c. Design standards. The design for freestanding buildings must employ 18 architectural, site and landscaping design elements integrated with, and 19 common to those used on the primary structure and its site. These 20 common design elements must include-colors, building materials, and 21 landscaping associated with the main structure. All freestanding 22 buildings must provide for vehicular and pedestrian inter-connection 23 between adjacent-abutting outparcels or freestanding sites and the 24 primary structure. 25 d. Primary facade standards. The following design features are in is an 26 additional to the list of requirement options which can be used to meet the 27 requirement in LDC section 5.05.08 CD.2.b. Primary façade standards 28 design features: 29 i. Walls expanding the design features of the building, not less than 30 7 feet high, creating a courtyard not less than 12 feet from the 31 building and length of no less than 60 percent of the length of the 32 associated facade. The courtyard may be gated and able to be 33 secured from exterior public access. Grilled openings are allowed 34 if courtyard is landscaped. Opening depths or wall terminations 35 must be a minimum of 12 inches deep. If the courtyard contains 36 service or utility equipment, the height and design must prevent 37 view from the exterior. Courtyard walls are not to be considered 38 fences. 39 ii. Trellis or latticework used as a support for climbing plants may 40 --- - - - - '- -- - - - -- - - - . 41 4-99. Roof treatments. 42 a. Purpose and intent. Variations in rooflines are used to add interest and 43 reduce massing of large buildings. Roof height and features must be in 44 scale with the building's mass, and shall complement the character of 45 surrounding buildings and neighborhoods. Roofing materials must be 46 constructed of durable, high-quality material in order to enhance the 47 appearance and attractiveness of the community. The following standards 48 identify appropriate roof treatments and features. 49 b. Roof edge and parapet treatment. 50 i. For buildings larger then 5,000 square feet in gross building area 51 a minimum of two roof edge or parapet line changes are required. 38 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc CommitteeWlaterials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 Each vertical change from the dominant roof condition must be a 2 - -- 3 feet. At least one such change must be located on a primary 4 façades. One additional roof change must be provided for every 5 100 linear feet of the façade length. 6 i. When a building's largest floor is greater than 5,000 square feet 7 in floor area a minimum of two roof-edge or parapet line changes 8 are required for all primary facades. One such change must be 9 located on primary facades. Thereafter, one additional roof 10 change is required every 100 linear feet around the perimeter of 11 the building. If a vertical change is used, each vertical change 12 from the dominant roof condition must be a minimum of 10 13 percent of building height, but no less than 3 feet. If a horizontal 14 change is used, each horizontal change from the dominant roof 15 condition must be a minimum of 20 percent of the facade length, 16 but no less than 3 feet. 17 ii. Roofs, other than mansard roofs, with the slope ratio of 3:12 or 18 higher are exempt from the above requirements for vertical 19 change for the façades that are less than 200 feet. One roof 20 edge, or parapet line change must be provided for every 200 21 linear feet of the façade length. 22 c. Roof Ddesign standards. Roofs must meet the following requirements: 23 i. When parapets are used, the average height of such parapets 24 must not exceed 4-520 percent of the height of the supporting wall, 25 with exception of the parapets used to screen mechanical 26 equipment. Parapets used to screen mechanical equipment must 27 be no less than the maximum height of the equipment. The height 28 of parapets shall not, at any point, exceed one-third the height of 29 the supporting wall. 30 ii. When a flat roof is screened with a parapet wall or mansard roof 31 at any façade, a parapet or mansard roof treatment must extend 32 along the remaining façades. 33 iii. When sloped roofs are used, the massing and height must be in 34 proportion with the height of its supporting walls. Sloped roofs 35 must meet the following requirements: 36 a) Sloped roofs that are higher than its supporting walls must 37 feature elements that create articulation and reduce the 38 massing of the roof. This includes: clearstory windows, 39 cupolas, dormers, vertical changes, or additional 40 complementary colors to the color of the roof. 41 b) The color(s) of a sloped roof must complement the color(s) 42 of the façades. 43 d. Prohibited roof types and materials. The following roof types and roof 44 materials are prohibited: 45 i. Asphalt shingles, except laminated, 320-pound, 30-year 46 architectural grade asphalt shingles or better. 47 ii. Mansard roofs and canopies, unless they meet the following 48 standards: 49 a) Minimum vertical distance of 8 feet is required for 50 buildings larger than 20,000 square feet, 39 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 b) Minimum vertical distance of 6 feet is required for 2 buildings of up to 20,000 square feet of g-ross floor area, 3 and 4 c) The roof angle shall not be less than 25 degrees, and not 5 greater than 70 degrees. 6 iii. Awnings used as a mansard or canopy roofs. 7 1410. Awning standards. These standards apply to those awnings associated with 8 and attached to a building or structure. 9 a. Mansard awnings, which are those awnings that span 90 percent, or 10 more, of a façade length and those, which do not provide a connection 11 between façades, must adhere to all roof standards of LDC Ssection 12 5.05.08-C.10.D.9. of this Code. 13 b. All other awnings, which are awnings that constitute less than 90 14 percent of a façade length, and those that do not provide a connection 15 between façades, must adhere to the following standards: 16 i. The portion of the awning with graphics may be backlit, provided 17 the illuminated portion of the awning with graphics does not 18 exceed size limitations and the other sign standards of LDC 19 -Ssections 5.06.00, 9.03.00, 9.04.00 and 10.02.06 Signs of this 20 Codc. 21 ii. The location of awnings must relate to the window and door 22 openings, or other ornamental design features. 23 c. Automobile sales parking lot awnings. Shade awnings may be erected 24 in automobile sales parking lots subject to the following requirements and 25 standards: �--. 26 i. Shade awning structures must not be constructed within 75 feet 27 of any public or private street. 28 ii. Single shade awning structures must not exceed an area 29 sufficient to provide cover to 20 automobiles or 3,240 square feet, 30 whichever is greater. 31 iii. The minimum separation between shade awning structures must 32 be 100 feet. 33 iv. Multi-colored shade awnings and the use of black or gray, 34 florescent, primary and/or secondary colors are prohibited. Earth 35 tone colors are encouraged. 36 4211. Entryway/customer entrance treatment. Please see LDC section 5.05.08 F.1. for 37 additional site design elements. 38 a. Purpose and intent. Entryway design elements are intended to give 39 protection from the sun and adverse weather conditions. These elements 40 must be integrated into a comprehensive design style for the project. 41 b. Single-tenant buildings and developments. Single-tenant buildings 42 shall have clearly defined, highly visible, customer entrances. The 43 customer entrance shall meet the following standards: 44 i. An outdoor patio area must be provided adjacent to the customer 45 entrance, with a minimum of 200 square feet in area. The patio 46 area must incorporate the following: 47 a) Benches or other seating components. 48 b) Decorative landscape planters or wing walls which 49 incorporate landscaped areas, and 50 c) Structural or vegetative shading. 40 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 ii. Front entry must be set back from a drive or a parking area by a 2 minimum distance of 4-5 10 feet. 3 c. Multiple-tenant buildings and developments. Multiple-tenant buildings 4 and developments must meet the following standards: 5 i. Anchor tenants must provide clearly defined, highly visible 6 customer entrances. 7 ii. Shaded outdoor community spaced must be provided at a 8 minimum ratio of one percent of the total gross floor area of all 9 on-site buildings. The community spaced shall be a minimum 10 area of 75 square feet and located off, or adjacent to, the main 11 circulation path of the complex and must incorporate benches or 12 other seating components, and 13 iii. Front entries shall be setback from a drive or a parking area by a 14 minimum of 45 10 feet. 15 4412. Materials and colors. 16 a. Purpose and intent. Exterior building colors and materials contribute 17 significantly to the visual impact of buildings on the community. The 18 colors and materials must be well designed and integrated into a 19 comprehensive design style for the project. 20 b. Exterior building colors. 21 i. The use of color materials or finish paint above level 8 saturation 22 (chroma) or below lightness level 3 on the Collier County 23 Architectural Color Charts is limited to no more than 10 percent of 24 a façade or the total roof area. 25 ii. The use of naturally occurring materials are permissible, such as 26 marble, granite, and slate and the following man-made materials: 27 silver unpainted metal roofs. 28 iii. The use of florescent colors is prohibited. 29 c. Exterior building materials (excluding roofs). The following building 30 finish materials are limited to no more than 33 percent of the facade area: 31 i. Corrugated, or metal panels, and 32 ii. Smooth concrete block. 33 d. Neon tubing. The use of neon or ncon typc tubing is prohibited on the 34 - - - - -- - - -- - -• 35 4413. Barber Ppoles. All traditional size (not more than 54 inches in height and not 36 more than 6 inches in diameter) and style barber poles which contain any 37 illuminated moving or rotating part may be permitted if the following and all other 38 applicable requirements are met: 39 a. The barber pole is attached to the exterior wall of an establishment 40 providing the services of a licensed barber: 41 b. Each such establishment (barbershop, salon, etc.) is limited to only one 42 barber pole: 43 c. No barber pole may move or rotate except when the establishment is 44 open and providing the services of a licensed barber: and 45 d. All barber poles that are illuminated, whether or not they rotate, shall 46 obtain require a building permit. 14. Neon tubing. The use of neon or neon type tubing is prohibited on the exterior and the roof of a building. 41 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Bold text indicates a defined term Changes to design standards for specific building uses: Proposed Section 5.05.08 E.2.c (page 45) Currently this section states that windows on self-storage buildings must not be false or applied and that if the window openings are into the storage area,translucent materials must be used. This section has been amended to allow for the use of false or applied windows consistent with the Committee's proposed changes to LDC section 5.05.08 D.6—window standards. The Committee found that this section has been interpreted too narrowly in the past to apply only to windows on the doors of individual storage units within the self-storage building. Additionally, the definition of the word translucent does not sufficiently capture the intent of this standard. The Committee proposes amending this section to clarify that translucent materials(defined as: glass that lets light pass through but objects on the other side cannot be seen clearly)must be used for windows used on either the storage unit doors or for windows looking into any corridors used to access the storage units. Windows used on corridors that access the storage units can be seen in Figure 8 below. Figure 8. Example of Self-Storage Buildings with Windows Providing View to Storage Unit Doors. I /cot!_•I 111 Irg, I ii e 4Iki. . _ _ _ i m 4. a n if Photo credit: oda.us.com Old Section 5.05.08 D.3.c (page 47) Currently, this section states that areas like management and business offices, check-out areas, restrooms,customer service areas, and food service areas within mercantile buildings(i.e.big-box stores) that can be accommodated within a space with a ceiling height of 16 feet or less must be designed and built within a single story envelope and must be located along the building edge that fronts the public right-of-way. The Committeeproposes to delete this section as it dictates the internal workings of the building and exceeds the intent of the architectural standards. Additionally,the Committee noted that there are other requirements in the proposed standards that control the design of big box stores. 42 1:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Staff notes: As stated in the discussion of the Committee's initial goals, it is the intent of the Committee to apply standards to big-box stores only and this standard applies to big box stores. Proposed Section 5.05.08 E.5.b.i.b) (page 47) Currently, this section states that covered walkways or arcades on a hotel/motel must be constructed with columns at least 12 inches wide. The Committee proposes to delete this specification. The Committee determined that there is no need for column massing on an open canopy and it will allow for more design flexibility. Proposed Section 5.05.08 E.6.c (page 48) Currently, this section states that variation in massing on warehousing/distribution buildings applies to primary facades and facades facing residential districts. The Committee proposes to change this standard to apply only to façades facing residential zoning districts when the building footprint is within 300 feet of a residential property line. This standard would be further limited to those facades facing residential zoning districts when the building footprint is located between 150 and 300 feet from the property line. The Committee proposes this change to ensure that the applicability standards in this section are consistent with the proposed applicability standards in section 5.05.08 B.2. Proposed Section 5.05.08 E.7.a (page 49) Currently,this section identifies that all architectural standards are applicable to industrial/factory buildings,with the exceptions listed in subsections 5.05.08 E.7.b-f. This section has been modified to identify that the standards listed in the following subsections are either exceptions, modifications, or additions to architectural standards to more accurately reflect the subsections that follow. Proposed Section 5.05.08 E.7.b (page 49) Currently,this section requires facades fronting arterial or collector streets to have two or more of the design features listed in sections 5.05.08 E.7.b.i through v. The Committee proposes to remove collector streets from this section to ensure that the applicability standards in this section are consistent with the proposed applicability standards in section 5.05.08 B.2. The title "Building façades" has been removed from the existing subsection b, and the remainder of this section has been reorganized for clarity. Proposed Section 5.05.08 E.7.b.i (page 49) Currently, section 5.05.08 E.7.b.i provides standards that replace the façade standards in proposed section 5.05.08 D.2 for industrial/factory buildings. Section E.7.b.i provides that windows at a minimum of 25 percent of the façade area are an option for a design feature on industrial and factory buildings. The Committee is proposing to reduce this percentage to 20 percent. They determined that the glazing standards in proposed section 5.05.08 D.2.b have been reduced therefore this reduction will provide consistency with the proposed reduction in required glazing throughout the architectural standards. ,^ 43 1:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term ,..� Proposed Section 5.05.08 E.7.c (page 50) Currently, the requirement for variation in massing on industrial/factory buildings only applies to primary facades and facades facing residential districts. The Committee proposes to change this standard to apply only to façades facing residential property when the building footprint is within 300 feet of a residential property line. This standard would be further limited to those facades facing residential zoning districts when the building footprint is located between 150 and 300 feet from the property line. The Committee proposes this change to ensure that the applicability standards in this section are consistent with the proposed applicability standards in section 5.05.08 B.2. Aerial and street view examples of an industrial building within 150 feet of residential property are depicted in Figure 9. Figure 9:An exam le o an industrial buildin: within 150 eet o residential i roperty. Aelt (a -'SY4A1 Cr) w � Ill w � ar ._ Collier County Property Appraiser Aerial Figure 9 continued on next page 3 44 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term -viii ...4. .4•,,,, r.• r ,,it OD li . V` S -04,i P.f.'rr,l r ♦ -!, A X meq+ .` ,--- p. ,rx. r y O ' ., J Lr, ` •;r ._ . ' ,: I lkr► . ww _ ...„,,,„...,..4,,-----.----r_ ' - -.. ..,..,.....e�.e s,. fi4 ,,, wm t.. ., in--1.-:_?-_, -. k't 4% , .R = .. k t tt' - • - 4 t Photo credit: Staff Proposed Section 5.05.08 E.7.d.i (page 50) Currently, primary facades on industrial and factory buildings are required to include a minimum of two of the seventeen building design treatments listed. The Committee proposes to eliminate the reference to the total number of options available. The Committee determined the total number of options listed is inaccurate, may change again in the future, and removing the reference to the total number adds clarity to the section. Proposed Section 5.05.08 E.7.d.ii (page 50) Currently this section states that industrial and factory buildings are required to provide at least one of the four listed site design elements. The Committee proposes to eliminate the reference to the total number of options available. The Committee determined the total number of options may change in the future and removing the reference to the total number adds clarity to the section. 1 DE. Design gstandards for specific building uses. 2 1. Standardized design buildings must meet the provisions of this Code. 3 2. Self-storage buildings. Self-storage buildings are subject to all of the 4 applicable provisions of this section with the following exceptions and additions: 5 a. Overhead doors. Overhead doors cannot be located on the primary 6 facade of self-storage buildings. 7 b. Screen walls. When a wall is proposed to screen the facility, it must be 8 constructed of material similar and complementary to the primary 9 building material and architecture. Long expanse of wall surface shall be 10 broken into sections no longer than 50 feet, and designed to avoid 11 monotony by use of architectural elements such as pillars. 12 c. Window standards. Windows must not be false or applied. If the window 13 openings are into the storage ar-eaunits or corridors used to access the 14 storage units, translucent material (i.e. glass that lets light pass through 15 but objects on the other side cannot be seen clearly) must be used. 16 d. Single-story self-storage buildings. LDC gsection 5.05.08 GD.2.b. 17 Primary facade stds design features can be replaced with one of 18 the following two options: 45 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 i. Option 1. 2 a) A minimum of 20 percent of the primary facade area must 3 be glazed; and 4 b) A covered public entry with a minimum roof area of 80 5 square feet and no dimension less than eight feet, or a 6 covered walkway at least six feet wide with a total length 7 measuring no less than 60 percent of the length of the 8 facade. 9 ii. Option 2. If the project design incorporates a screen wall around 10 the perimeter of the self-storage facility, the following standards 11 apply: 12 a) Architecturally treated, eight-foot high, screen wall is 13 required to screen the facility, and 14 b) The roof slope for the buildings is a minimum of 4:12 ratio 15 for double slopes, and 3:12 ratio for single slope, and 16 c) A landscape buffer at least 7 feet wide is required on 17 each side of the wall. 18 iii. In the case that none of the above options are met, then LDC 19 Ssection 5.05.08 GD.2.b. Primary facade standards design 20 features must be met. 21 e. Multi-story self-storage buildings. The requirements of LDC Ssection 22 5.05.08 GD.2.b. Primary facade-standards design features can be 23 replaced with one of the following standards two options: 24 i. Option 1. 25 a) A minimum of 20 percent of the primary facade area must 26 be glazed; and 27 b) A covered public entry with a minimum roof area of 80 28 square feet and no dimension less than eight feet, or a 29 covered walkway at least six feet wide with a total length 30 measuring no less than 60 percent of the length of the 31 facade. and 32 c) Requirements of LDC Ssection 5.05.08 C.8.b.D.5. Blank 33 wall area apply to all fagades,1 facades, and 34 d) Foundation planting areas must be a minimum 15 percent 35 of the ground level building area. 36 ii. Option 2. If project design incorporates a screen wall around the 37 perimeter of the self-storage facility. The following standards 38 apply: 39 a) Architecturally treated, eight feet high screen wall is 40 required to screen the ground floor of the facility, and 41 b) Landscape buffer, minimum 7 feet wide is required on 42 each side of the wall;; and 43 c) Primary facades above the ground level must include 44 glazing, covering at a minimum 20 percent of the facade 45 area;; and 46 d) Requirements of LDC Ssection 5.05.08 C.8.b.D.5.a. Blank 47 wall area applies to all facades;: and 48 e) Foundation planting areas must be a minimum 15 percent 49 of the ground level building area. 46 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 iii. In the case that none of the above options are met, then LDC 2 Ssection 5.05.08 GD.2.b. Primary façade-standards design 3 features must be met. 4 3. Mercantile. 5 a. Applicability. All standards listed in LDC-Ssection 5.05.08: are applicable 6 with the following exceptions and additions. 7 b. Large Rretail Sstructures. The purpose of this section is to break up the 8 monolithic appearance of large retail structures and present a more 9 human scale of architecture to the public road right-of-way view. 10 Because these buildings house a variety of functions that can 11 accommodate+tea variety of spatial types, they must be designed to 12 express these functions in a manner that has the appearance of a group 13 of buildings of varying scale and size. 14 c. All areas with the building that can be accommodated within a space with 15 a ceiling height of 16 feet or leas, must be designed and built within a 16 single story envelope or a multiple of envelopes. These building 17 - ' - 18 - - ' - - - - _ - -••-• - - - - '- - - - •• - 19 building along the building edge or edges that front the public right of 20 way. These areas must include, but are not limited to: 21 i. The management and busine"c office. 22 ii. Check out area. 23 iii. Rest rooms. 24 iv. Customer service area. 25 v. Food service areas. 26 dc. Windows and entrances. When more than two retailers with separate 27 exterior customer entrances are located within the principal building, the 28 following standards apply: 29 i. The first floor of the primary façades must utilize transparent 30 windows and doors for no less than 30 percent of the horizontal 31 length of the building façade. 32 ii. Primary building entrances must be clearly defined and 33 connected with a sheltering element such as a roof canopy or 34 arcade. 35 4. Facilities with fuel pumps. 36 a. In addition to the requirements of LDC section 5.05.05 Facilities with 37 fuel pumps, all standards established in this section are applicable. 38 5. Hotel/motel. 39 a. Applicability. All standards of LDC Ssection 5.05.08- are applicable with 40 the following exceptions. 41 b. Design features. LDC .section 5.05.08 GD.2.b. Primary façade 42 sta -elfeatures can be replaced as follows: 43 i. The design of the primary facades must include windows and 44 other glazed openings covering at least 20 percent of the primary 45 façade area, and one of the following design features: 46 a) Projected, or recessed, covered public entry providing a 47 minimum horizontal dimension of eight feet, and a 48 minimum area of 100 square feet, or 49 b) Covered walkway or arcade (excluding canvas type) 50 constructed with columns at least 12 inches wide, that is -' 51 attached to the building, or located no more than 12 feet 47 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term from the building. The structure must be permanent and 2 its design must relate to the principal structure. The 3 minimum width shall be eight feet, with a total length 4 measuring 60 percent of the length of the associated 5 façade. 6 ii. For buildings located 200 feet or more from the street right-of- 7 way, the projected or recessed entry and covered walkway or 8 arcade, required by the above LDC Ssection 5.05.08 GE.5.b.i., 9 can be located on any façade. 10 6. Warehousing/distribution. 11 a. Applicability. All standards listed in LDC Ssection 5.05.08: are applicable 12 except for the following: 13 b. Primary façade standards. The requirements of LDC Ssection 5.05.08 14 QD.2.b. Primary facades design features are replaced with the 15 following standards. Façades fronting on arterial or collector streets 16 must have two or more of the following design features: 17 i. Windows at a minimum of ten percent of the façade area. 18 ii. Projected or recessed covered public entry providing a minimum 19 of eight feet by eight feet cover. 20 iii. Foundation planting consisting of trees and shrubs. The total 21 length of the planting area must be a minimum of 25 percent of 22 the façade length and be distributed along the façade to reduce 23 the blank wall area. The depth of the planting area must be a 24 minimum of ten feet. The plant material shall be as required by 25 LDC-Ssection 4.06.05 of this Ge-do. 26 iv. Masonry, concrete or tilt-up construction. 27 v. Building height of 40 feet or less and the building street 28 setback of 200 feet or more. 29 c. Variation in massing. The requirements of LDC Ssection 5.05.08 G-4.D.3. 30 Variation in massing applies only to primary façades and to façades 31 facing residential zoning districts when the building footprint is located 32 within 300 feet of the residential property line. 33 i. However, variation in massing only applies to facades facing 34 residential zoning districts when the building footprint is located 35 between 150 and 300 feet from the property line. 36 d. Building design treatments. The requirements of LDC Ssection 5.05.08 37 C.5.c.D.4. Building design treatments are modified as follows: 38 i. Primary facades must include a minimum of two of the building 39 design treatments listed under this section. 40 e. Site design elements. The requirements of LDC Ssection 5.05.08 41 C.5.d.F.1. Site design elements are modified to require, at a minimum, 42 one of the four listed site design elements. 43 f. Detail f aturesBlank wall areas. The requirements of LDC Ssection 44 5.05.08 G-8-D.5. Detail features Blank wall areas are replaced with the 45 following standards: 46 i. Blank wall areas. Blank, opaque wall areas must not exceed 15 47 feet in vertical direction or 50 feet in horizontal direction of any 48 primary façade or any façade facing a residential district. 49 a)_For facades connected to a primary facade, this must 50 apply to a minimum of 25 percent of the attached facade 51 measured from the connection point. 48 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 b) Control and expansion joints within this area constitute 2 blank wall area unless used as a decorative pattern and 3 spaced at intervals of ten feet or less. Relief and reveal 4 work depth must be a minimum of'h inch and may be 5 different than the color of the wall. 6 g. Roof treatments. The requirements of LDC Ssection 5.05.08 C.10.D.9. 7 Roof treatments are replaced with the following standards: 8 i. If parapets are used, the end of the parapet must wrap corners for 9 a minimum distance of 25 percent of the length of the facade, 10 measured from the corner. 11 ii. The facades facing arterial or collector road and facades facing 12 residential district must have variations from the dominant roof 13 condition. The roof edge and parapets must have a minimum of 14 one vertical change for every 150 lineal feet of the façade length. 15 The vertical change must be a minimum of ten percent of the 16 building height, but no less than three feet. 17 iii. All rooftop-mounted equipment including air conditioning units, 18 vents, etc., must be shielded from view with parapets, louver 19 screens, or similar equipment screens. 20 h. Materials and colors. The requirements of LDC-Ssection 5.05.08 21 C.13.D.12. Materials and colors are applicable with exception of 22 Ssubsection 5.05.08 C.13D.12.c. Exterior building materials, which is 23 replaced with the following standards: 24 i. Primary façades. The use of ribbed, corrugated, and reflective 25 metal panels is limited to a maximum of 33 percent of the façade 26 area. 27 ii. Façades attached to a primary façade. The use of ribbed, 28 corrugated, and reflective metal panels is limited to no more 29 thenthan 33 percent of the wall area for the 25 percent of the 30 overall wall length of the facades attached to a primary façade, 31 measured from the corners. 32 i. Special Height Requirements. All buildings over 30 feet in height, 33 measured from the first finished floor to the roof eave, that are located 34 within 300 feet from the arterial or collector street right-of-way, must 35 comply with LDC Ssection 5.05.08 C-4D.3. Variation in Amassing, and 36 SectionD.5. Detail features Blank wall areas are applicable to on all 37 building façades. 38 7. Industrial/factory buildings. 39 a. Applicability. All standards listed in LDC Ssection 5.05.08- are applicable 40 with the following exceptions, modifications, and additions. 41 b. Building far-: . 42 +b. Primary Ffacade Sstandards. The requirements of LDC-Ssection 5.05.08 43 GD.2.b. Primary faradc standards design features are replaced with the 44 following standards. Façades fronting on arterial or collector streets 45 must have two or more of the following design features: 46 ani. Windows at a minimum of 2520 percent of the façade area. 47 Projected or recessed covered public entry providing a minimum 48 of eight feet by eight feet cover, and a minimum of 15 percent of 49 the wall area devoted to windows. 50 o)iii. The total length of the planting area must be at least 33 percent of 51 the façade length and be distributed along the façade to reduce 49 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 the blank wall area. The depth of the planting area must be a 2 minimum of ten feet. The plant material must be as required by 3 LDC-Ssection 4.06.05. 4 €1-)iv. Masonry, concrete or tilt-up construction, and 15 percent of the 5 wall area allocated to windows. 6 e)v. Building height of 40 feet or less, with a building street setback 7 of 200 feet or more. 8 ++c. Variation in Mmassing. The requirements of LDC Ssection 5.05.08 9 C.1I.D.3. Variation in massing applies only to the primary facades and to 10 facades facing residential zoning districts when the building footprint is 11 located within 300 feet of the residential property line. 12 i. However, variation in massing only applies to facades facing 13 residential zoning districts when the building footprint is located 14 between 150 and 300 feet from the property line. 15 i4d. Project standards. 16 a}i. The requirements of LDC-Ssection 5.05.08 C.5.c.D.4. Building 17 design treatments are modified to require industrial/factory 18 buildings to provide, at the primary facades only, a minimum of 19 two of the 17 building design treatments listed under this section. 20 19-)ii. The requirements of LDC-Ssection 5.05.08 C.5.d.F.1. Site design 21 elements are modified to require at least one of the four listed site 22 design elements. 23 se. Detail Ffeatures. The requirements of LDC Ssection 5.05.08&D.5. 24 Detail features Blank wall areas are replaced with the following standards: 25 i. Blank, opaque wall areas must not exceed 15 feet in vertical 26 direction or 50 feet in horizontal direction of any primary facade 27 and any facade facing a residential district. 28 iheZ For facades connected to a primary facade, the blank 29 wall standards applies to a minimum of 25 percent of the 30 attached facade, measured from the connection point. 31 Control and expansion joints within the facade area 32 constitute blank wall area unless used as a decorative 33 pattern, and must be spaced at intervals of ten feet or less. 34 Relief and reveal work depth must be a minimum of'/ inch 35 and may be different than the color of the wall. 36 cif. Roof Ttreatments. The requirements of LDC section 5.05.08 C.10.D.9. 37 Roof treatments are replaced with the following standards: 38 i. If parapets are used, the end of the parapet must wrap corners for 39 a minimum distance of 25 percent of the length of the facade, 40 measured from the corner. 41 ii. Facades facing arterial or collector roads and facades facing 42 residential districts must have vertical changes from the dominant 43 roof condition. The roof edge and parapets must have a minimum 44 of one vertical change for every 150 lineal feet of the facade 45 length. The vertical change shall be a minimum of ten percent of 46 the building height, but no less than three feet. 47 iii. All rooftop-mounted equipment including air conditioning units, 48 vents, etc., must be shielded from view with parapets, louver 49 screens, or similar equipment screens. 50 eg.. Materials and Gcolors. The requirements of LDC section 5.05.08 51 C.13.D.12. Materials and colors are applicable with the exception of 50 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 Ssubsection 5.05.08 C.13.D.12.c. Exterior building materials, which is 2 replaced with the following standard: 3 i. Primary façades. The use of ribbed, corrugated, and reflective 4 metal panels is limited to a maximum of 33 percent of the facade 5 area. 6 ii. Facades attached to a primary facade. For 25 percent of the 7 overall wall length of façades attached to a primary facade, 8 measured from the corners, the use of ribbed, corrugated, and 9 reflective metal panels is limited to no more then than 33 percent 10 of the wall area. 11 fh. Special Hheight Rrequirements. All buildings over 30 feet in height 12 measured from the first finished floor to the roof eave that are located 13 within 300 feet from the arterial or collector street right-of-way must 14 meet the comply with LDC Ssections 5.05.08 C.4.D.3. Variation in 15 Massing, and Section 5.08.08-G-8:D.5. Detail features Blank wall areas 16 are applicable to on all building facades. 17 8. Parking structures. All standards listed in LDC-Ssection 5.05.08- are applicable 18 unless otherwise specified below. 19 a. Primary facades. The requirements of LDC-Ssection 5.05.08 GD.2.b. 20 Primary facade standards design features are replaced with the following 21 standards: 22 i. All exposed façades of any parking structure above the second 23 floor are considered primary facades. 24 ii. A minimum of 60 percent of the area of any primary façade of a 25 parking structure or covered parking facility must incorporate at 26 least two of the following: 27 a) Transparent windows, with clear or lightly tinted glass, 28 where pedestrian oriented businesses are located along 29 the façade of the parking structure, 30 b) Display windows, 31 c) Decorative grill work or similar detailing which provides 32 texture and screens the parking structure openings, 33 d) Art or architectural treatment such as sculpture, mosaic, 34 glass block, opaque art glass, relief work or similar 35 features, or 36 e) Vertical trellis or plant material screening the openings. 37 b. Building foundation planting. The perimeter of a parking structure at 38 grade must meet the building foundation planting requirements of LDC 39 Ssection 4.06.05. of this Code. 40 c. Massing standards. The requirements of LDC Ssection 5.05.08 C.4.D.3. 41 Variation in massing are applicable, with the following exception: 42 i. If the ramps and inclines are on an exposed facade and they 43 exceed the maximum length or uninterrupted curve, a projection 44 or recess must occur at the start and end but not required at the 45 ramp/incline. 46 d. Wall Pplane Gchanges. The requirements of LDC Ssection 5.05.08 47 C,4D_3.b. are applicable with the following exception: 48 i. If the ramps and inclines are on an exposed façade and they 49 exceed the maximum horizontal length, a wall plane projection or 50 recess must occur at the start and end but not required at the 51 ramp/incline. 51 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 e. Detail features. The façade area within 42 inches above each floor/deck 2 shall not be open more than 50 percent, except at openings for vehicle or 3 pedestrian access. 4 9. Outside play structures. 5 a. Maximum coverage. Outside play structures must not cover more than 6 50 percent of the façade area. 7 b. Location. No portion of any play structure, located between the front 8 building line and any adjacent right-of-way, may exceed a height of 12 9 feet as measured from existing ground elevation. In all other cases, no 10 portion of any play structure may exceed a maximum height of 16 feet as 11 measured from existing ground elevation. 12 c. Colors. Play structures must be limited to earth tone colors, with a 13 maximum of three colors. Changes to site design standards: Proposed Section 5.05.08 F.1. (page 55) The Committee proposes to relocate the site design elements from the existing location in old section 5.05.08 C.5.c since these standards are related to site design. Proposed Section 5.05.08 F.1.d(page 56) Currently, this site design option allows for site sculptures. The Committee proposes to add the option of water features including fountains to this option. This addition will allow for a water feature on the site to be recognized as an architectural site design element. The addition of fountains will give the applicant more site design elements to choose from. Currently the menu only has four options and the applicant must choose two. The Committee recognizes the menu list is limited which makes it hard for some projects to incorporate the required two options. The addition of more site design elements will allow applicants to select options that are better suited to their site rather than utilizing an element simply because it is included on the list of site design options. Proposed Section 5.05.08 F.2.b.i (page 56) Currently, this section applies the requirements for landscaping in vehicular use areas found in LDC section 4.05.04 C (which apply only to projects requesting 120 percent of minimum parking if at least 80 spaces are required) to all projects subject to architectural standards regardless of the minimum number of spaces. This means that any project requesting 120 percent of minimum required parking must devote 20 percent of the vehicular use areas to landscaping, pursuant to LDC section 4.06.03 B.1. The Committee determined the current language penalized smaller parking lots by requiring much more landscaping. For example, an applicant that is required to provide 10 parking spaces but that is requesting to provide 12 parking spaces would meet the 120 percent threshold and would be required to provide twice as much landscaping, whereas required landscaping would not increase for an applicant required to provide 80 parking spaces that is requesting 15 additional spaces. The Committee stated that this additional landscaping then becomes difficult to fit on the site. The proposed change describes the requirement rather than providing a cross-reference. This means that the standard will only apply to projects that require a minimum of 80 parking spaces rather than to all projects subject to architectural standards. 52 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Proposed section 5.05.08 F.2.b.ii (page 56) Currently, this section provides parking design standards for projects which limit the amount of off-street parking that can be located between the primary façade and the abutting street. The Committee proposes increase the percentage of parking on interior lots that can be located between the building and an abutting street from 50 to 80 percent. The Committee relayed that the requirement to provide parking in the rear of the building can cause safety concerns related to delivery and service vehicles and that the public is not aware that additional parking is provided in the rear of the building. The Committee also believes that smaller parking lots in front of buildings could give the perception that there is no parking available. Finally, The Committee identified that this standard applies to office and medical buildings as well. Staff notes: This change will likely result in a larger mass of parking in front of the building. For interior lots, 30 percent more parking could be located in front of the building. Old Section 5.05.08 E.2.c (page 57) Currently, this section requires an equal number of pedestrian pathway connections and vehicular connections. Additionally, this section states that when drive aisles lead to main entrances, a walkway must be provided on at least one side. The Committee proposes to remove this section. The Committee indicated that pedestrian connectivity is addressed in other codes such as the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) and the Florida Accessibility Code which require each building to be connected to the perimeter sidewalk. The Committee does not believe there is a nexus to require the same number of vehicle and pedestrian accesses. The Committee believes that requiring pedestrian access to be located near drive aisles creates a safety hazard and creates unneeded impervious area. Additionally,the Committee also received public comments indicating this standard is more stringent than ADA requirements and that additional pedestrian pathways can sometimes cause drainage issues when designing a site. Staff notes: This change will allow fewer pedestrian pathway connections on sites with more than one access to arterial or collector roadways. Proposed Section 5.05.08 F.3.e (page 57) Currently, this section requires a minimum five foot wide building perimeter path connecting all entrances and exits (excluding emergency exits) of a building and along the full length of the row of parking spaces if parking is proposed along the building façade within 15 feet of a building wall. The Committee proposes to change the name of"building perimeter path"to "building pedestrian pathway," and to eliminate the requirement to provide a pedestrian pathway that interconnects all entrances and exits. The Committee relayed that this change will decrease the impervious area on sites and will make it easier for smaller buildings to comply. The Committee indicated that smaller buildings often struggle to fit all of their site design elements, parking, and sidewalks on site. Proposed Section 5.05.08 F.3.g.i (page 57) Currently, this section requires pedestrian pathways to provide intermittent shaded areas every 50 linear feet of the walkway. The Committee determined this requirement becomes difficult to fit if the pathway is located in front of a building. They also suggested that because parking lot regulations require an island with a tree every 10 parking spaces this requirement is not necessary 53 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2 Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term r., for parking lots. Finally, it was noted that mature trees have canopy spans of 30 feet meaning a tree every 50 linear feet would actually have tree canopies overlapping after maturity. As a result, the Committee has proposed limiting this to "required pathways" and increasing the requirement for intermittent shaded areas to every 100 feet. Staff notes: The requirement for trees providing shading for pedestrian pathways is intended for pathways that are not adjacent to or near parking areas and therefore not covered by any required landscaping for parking lots. This condition occurs when pathways are provided away from parking areas and connecting buildings, recreational uses, and other functions,particularly on larger sites where these pathways distances can be lengthy. Proposed Section 5.05.08 F.3.g.ii (page 57) Currently, this section requires site amenities on site development plans that enhance safety and convenience and promote walking or bicycling like bike racks, drinking fountains, and benches. The Committee proposes to eliminate this section. The Committee reported this change will eliminate redundancy with other sections of the LDC. Staff notes: While bike racks are required by other sections of the LDC, drinking fountains are not addressed elsewhere and the use of benches is optional in LDC section 5.05.08. Proposed Section 5.05.08 F.4.b. (page 58) Currently, this section requires all visual and acoustic impacts of service function areas to be screened and fully contained from adjacent properties. The Committee determined acoustic impacts are impossible to fully contain, and propose removing the requirement to screen acoustic impacts. Proposed Section 5.05.08 F.6.b (page 58) Currently, this section requires drive-through facilities be a minimum of 1,000 square feet. The Committee is proposing to eliminate the minimum square footage requirement. They determined that no minimum square footage should be required if all other site plan requirements are met. Additionally, minimum building sizes are already established in LDC section 4.02.01 as follows: o C-1 zoning districts: 1,000 sq. ft. o C-2 zoning districts: 1,000 sq. ft. o C-3 zoning districts: 700 sq. ft. o C-4 zoning districts: 700 sq. ft. o C-5 zoning districts: 700 sq. ft. These building sizes are similar to the current minimum building size for drive-through facilities and there were no perceived situations where a smaller square footage building would be an issue. During the discussion, one Committee member noted the drive through portion of a facility should only be allowed in conjunction with the primary use and not an accessory use and that removing the minimum square footage requirement would allow for a small "kiosk" type drive-through (Figure 10) as an outparcel. 54 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Additionally,the Committee proposes to amend the standard for additional drive-through facilities _ in multi-tenant buildings. Currently,this section allows an additional drive-through for each tenant and an additional drive through for each tenant with a minimum of 5,000 square feet. The Committee proposes to change the section to allow for one drive-through facility for each building and an additional drive-through for each tenant with a minimum of 1,500 square feet of floor area. This change provides for an unlimited number of drive-through facilities for each building with tenants that meet the required floor area. Figure 10: Example of a small kiosk type drive-through. Photo credit: Google Maps Proposed Section 5.05.08 F.7.e (page 59) Currently, this section specifies that foreground spaces such as building entrances, plazas, and seating areas must utilize local lighting that defines the space without glare. The Committee proposes to eliminate the words"without glare."They determined glare is covered by LDC section 5.05.08 F.7.b in shielding standards for lighting. Proposed Section 5.05.08 F.8 (page 59) Currently,this section cross references LDC section 4.06.02 D. for water management area design standards. The Committee is proposing to add "in buffer areas" to the description for clarity and coordination of the title since 4.06.02 D. is the Buffers section of the LDC. 1 EF. Site Ddesign-standards. Compliance with the standards set forth in this section must 2 be demonstrated by submittal of architectural drawings and a site development plan in 3 accordance with the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.02.03, 4 1. Site design elements. Please see LDC section 4.06.00 Landscaping, Buffering, 5 and Vegetation for landscaping standards and section 5.05.0.8 D.11. for 6 entryway/customer entrance treatment requirements. All projects must have, at a 7 minimum, one of the following: 8 a. Decorative landscape planters or planting areas, a minimum of five feet 9 wide, and areas for shaded seating consisting of a minimum of 100 10 square feet; 11 b. Integration of specialty pavers, tile, or stamped or decorative concrete 12 along the building perimeter walkway. This treatment must constitute a -- 13 minimum of 60 percent of walkway area, 55 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 c. Two accent or specimen trees above the minimum landscape code 2 requirements for every 100 feet of the front facade, and a minimum of 3 two for the rest of the project, with a minimum height of 18 feet at 4 planting; or 5 d. Site sculptures and/or water features including fountains. 6 42. Off-street parking design. As provided for in LDC Ssection 4.05.00, and subject 7 to the following provisions: 8 a. Purpose and intent. Commercial buildings and projects, including their 9 outparcels shall be designed to provide safe, convenient, and efficient 10 access for pedestrians and vehicles. Parking shall be designed in a 11 consistent and coordinated manner for the entire site. The parking area 12 shall be integrated and designed so as to enhance the visual appearance 13 of the community. 14 b. Design standards. Parking, utilizing the same degree of angle, shall be 15 developed throughout the site to provide efficient and safe traffic and 16 pedestrian circulation. A single bay of parking provided along the 17 perimeter of the site may vary in design in order to maximize the number 18 of spaces provided on-site. The mixture of one-way and two-way parking 19 aisles, or different degrees of angled parking within any parking area is 20 prohibited, except as noted above, or where individual parking areas are 21 physically separated from one another by a continuous landscape 22 buffer, a minimum five feet in width with limited access. Landscape 23 buffers for these locations shall use landscape material other than grass 24 for separation of parking areas. 25 i. Maximum parking. 26 minimum parking requirements shall provide additional 27 landscaping as described in section 4.05.01 of this Code. The 28 following standards shall apply to projects that require a minimum 29 of 80 parking spaces but that provide more than 120 percent of 30 the required paved off-street surface parking: 31 a) At least twenty percent of the amount of vehicular use 32 area onsite shall be devoted to interior landscaping areas. 33 ii. Parking for projects. Projects shall be designed to adhere to the 34 following standards: 35 a) Interior lots. No more than 50 80 percent of the off-street 36 parking for the entire commercial building or project shall 37 be located between any primary facade of the commercial 38 building or project and the abutting street or navigable 39 waterway. 40 b) Corner lots. No more than 80 percent of the off-street 41 parking for the entire commercial building or project shall 42 be located between any primary facade of the commercial 43 building or project and the abutting street or navigable 44 waterway area, with no single side to contain more than 65 45 percent of the required parking. 46 23. Pedestrian pathways. 47 a. Purpose and intent. To provide safe opportunities for alternative modes of 48 transportation by connecting with existing and future pedestrian and 49 bicycle pathways within the county and to provide safe passage from the 50 public right-of-way to the building or project which includes the area 51 between the parking areas and the building perimeter walk, and between 56 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 alternative modes of transportation. The on-site pedestrian system must 2 provide adequate directness, continuity, street and drive aisle crossings, 3 visible interest and security as defined by the standards in this Section. 4 b. Pedestrian access standards. Pathways and crosswalks must be 5 provided as to separate pedestrian traffic from vehicular traffic while 6 traveling from the parking space to building entries and from building 7 entries to outparcels and to pathways along adjacent roadways. 8 Pedestrians will only share pavement with vehicular traffic in marked 9 crosswalks. 10 c. Minimum ratios. Pedestrian pathway-eennestions must be provided from 11 -- - - - - -- - --- -- - - - - - - - - "-- --1213 - - - - - - 14 8c. Minimum dimensions. Pedestrian pathways must be a minimum of five 15 feet wide. 16 ed. Materials. Pedestrian pathways must be consistent with the provisions 17 of Section 4.5 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Accessibility 18 Guidelines. Materials may include specialty pavers, concrete, colored 19 concrete, or stamped pattern concrete. 20 fe. Building pedestrian pathway. perimeter path. A minimum five feet wide 21 building perimeter path is required as specified below: 22 i. A continuous building perimeter path interconnecting all public 23 entrances and exits of a building is required. For the purposes of 24 this section, employee, service or delivery entrances, or 25 emergency "exits-only" are excluded. 26 ii. If parking area is proposed along the building façade within 15 27 feet from a building wall, a building perimeter path the 28 pedestrian pathway shall must be provided along the full length 29 of the row of parking spaces facing the building. 30 gf. Pedestrian crosswalks. Standard crosswalks must be installed at stop- 31 controlled-crossings. Uncontrolled crossings must be high visibility 32 longitudinal lines as shown in the Florida Department of Transportation 33 Roadway and Traffic Design Standards. 34 lig. Shade and site amenities. See LDC section 4.06.00 Landscaping, 35 Buffering, and Vegetation for additional requirements. 36 i. Required Ppedestrian pathways must provide intermittent 37 shaded areas when the walkway exceeds 50100 linear feet in 38 length at a minimum ratio of one shade canopy tree per every 39 50100 linear feet of walkway. The required shade trees must be 40 located no more than ten feet from edge of the sidewalk. 41 !- . - -- - - - - - -42 - 43 alternative means of transportation. Site amenities may include 44 bike racks (as required by Section 1.05.08 of this Code), drinking 45 fountains, canopies and benches. 46 24. Service function areas and facilities. Service function areas include, but are not 47 limited to: loading areas and docks, outdoor storage, vehicle storage excluding 48 car display areas, trash collection areas, trash compaction and recycling areas, 49 roof top equipment, utility meters, antennas, mechanical and any other outdoor 50 equipment and building services supporting the main use or operation of the 57 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text otrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 property. See LDC section 4.02.12 Design Standards for Outdoor Storage for 2 additional requirements. 3 a. Purpose and intent. To diminish the visual and acoustic impacts of 4 service functions that may detract from, or have a negative impact on, the 5 surrounding properties and the overall community image. 6 b. Buffering and screening standards. Service function areas must be 7 located and screened so that the visual and acoustic impacts of these 8 functions are fully contained and screened from adjacent properties, 9 including public and private streets. 10 c. Screening material and design standards. Screening materials, colors 11 and design must be consistent with design treatment of the primary 12 façades of the building or project and the landscape plan. 13 d. Trash enclosures. For the location, size, and design standards for trash 14 enclosures, see LDC section 5.03.04 Dumpsters and Recycling. 15 e. Loading areas and docks. Vehicle loading areas must be screened from 16 streets and adjacent residential districts. Screening must consist of wing 17 walls, shrubs, trees, berms, or combination thereof. 18 f. Conduits, meters and vents and other equipment attached to the building 19 or protruding from the roof must be screened or painted to match 20 surrounding building surfaces. Conduits and meters cannot be located 21 on the primary façade of the building. 22 g. All rooftop mechanical equipment protruding from the roof must be 23 screened from public view by integrating it into a building and roof 24 design. ,-� 25 h. Outdoor vending machines must be located so that they are not visible 26 from adjacent properties and streets. 27 45. Fencing standards. For restrictions on fence material, fence height, and design, 28 see LDC Ssection 5.03.02 Fences and Walls. 29 56. Drive-through facilities standards. See LDC section 4.05.09 Stacking Lane 30 Requirements for additional requirements. 31 a. Drive-through facilities location and buffering standards. Drive-through 32 facilities must be secondary in emphasis and priority given to any other 33 access and circulation functions. Such facilities must be located at side 34 or rear locations that do not interrupt direct pedestrian access and avoid 35 potential pedestrian/vehicle conflict. 36 i. If site constraints limit the location of the drive through facility to 37 the area between the right-of-way and associated building, the 38 vegetation required by a Type "B" landscape buffer must be 39 installed within the buffer width required for the project and 40 maintained along the entire length of the drive-through lane and 41 adjacent right-of-way. In addition to the vegetative buffer 42 referenced above, a permanent, covered, porte-cochere or similar 43 structure, (canvas awning and canopies are excluded), must be 44 installed extending the width of the drive-through with the roof 45 covering the service window(s). Such structure shall be an 46 integral part of the design of the building. 47 b. Required floor area. One drive-through facility is permitted per tenant for 48 each building. Buildings must be a minimum of 1,000 square feet. For 49 multi-tenant buildings, an additional drive-through is allowed for each ----' 50 tenant with a minimum of 5000-1,500 square feet of gfess floor area. 51 Drive-through facilities may have multiple drive lanes. 58 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 67. Lighting. See LDC sections 4.05.02 D and 6.06.03 for additional requirements. 2 a. Purpose and intent. All building sites and projects, including outparcels, 3 shall be designed to provide safe, convenient, and efficient lighting for 4 pedestrians and vehicles. Lighting must be designed in a consistent and 5 coordinated manner for the entire site. The lighting and lighting fixtures 6 must be integrated and designed so as to enhance the visual impact of 7 the project on the community and blend with the landscape. 8 b. Shielding standards. Lighting must be designed so as to prevent direct 9 glare, light spillage and hazardous interference with automotive and 10 pedestrian traffic on adjoining streets and all adjacent properties. Light 11 sources must be concealed or shielded. 12 c. Height standards. Lighting fixtures within the parking lot must be a 13 maximum of 25 feet in height, and 15 feet in height for the non-vehicular 14 pedestrian areas. 15 d. Design standards. Lighting must be used to provide safety while 16 accenting key architectural elements and to emphasize landscape 17 features. Light fixtures must complement the design of the project. This 18 can be accomplished through style, material or color. 19 e. Illumination. Background spaces, such as parking lots, shall be 20 illuminated as unobtrusively as possible to meet the functional needs of 21 safe circulation and of protecting people and property. Foreground 22 spaces, including building entrances and plaza seating areas, must 23 utilize local lighting that defines the space without glare. 24 78. Water management areas in buffer areas. For design standards for water 25 management areas in buffer areas, including location and the required 26 amenities, see LDC section 4.06.02 D. of this Code. No changes to alternative architectural review: Existing Section 5.05.08 G (page 59) The Committee voted not to change any provisions related to Deviations and Alternate Design Compliance. The section is renumbered to reflect changes in prior sections. 27 FG. Deviations and Aalternate Gcompliance. The following alternative compliance process is 28 established to allow deviations from the requirements of this section as approved by the 29 County Manager or designee. 30 * * * * * * * * * * * * Changes to exceptions for PUDs: Old Section 5.05.08 G (page 59) This section currently provides an exception for Planned Unit Developments. This section is proposed to be deleted by the County Attorney's Office because it already exists elsewhere in the LDC. 31 32 G. Exceptions. 33 1. Exceptions to the provisions of this Code may be granted by the Board of County 34 __ • -- - - •• - - ' - ` - - - _ _ -- 35 demonstrated that such exceptions are necessary to allow for innovative design 59 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2Wrchitectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 2 deemed to meet the overall purpose and intent set forth herein. In the case of 3 individual projects subject to Section 5.05.08 standards, where site specific 4 factors may impact the ability to meet these standards, variance from one or 56 procedures set forth in Section 9.04.00 Variances of this Code. 7 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 60 1:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Appendix A In proposed LDC section 5.05.08 B.2, the applicability of the architectural standards for non- residential buildings and projects is determined based on a buildings' distance from an arterial or collector road. This appendix is intended to clearly demonstrate how to measure this distance. Proposed LDC section 5.05.08 B.2.a states: 2. Non-residential buildings and projects when at least one of the following conditions exists. For the purposes of this section, arterial and collector roads are identified in the Traffic Circulation Element of the GMP. a. The project site is located within 300 feet of an arterial or collector road, including all rights-of-way, and is located in a non-industrial zoning district. However, a proposed project site located within 150 to 300 feet of an arterial or collector road, including all rights-of-way, shall be required to comply with LDC sections 5.05.08 D.3., D.9., D.12., D.14., E, and F. Compliance shall be limited to the building facades facing the arterial or collector road. It is important to note that the term"right-of-way"is a defined term in LDC section 1.08.02 which states: "Right-of-way (ROW): Land in which the state, a county, or a municipality owns the fee simple title or has an easement dedicated or required for a transportation or utility use. " This means that for the purposes of determining the applicability of the architectural standards to a non-residential building the measurement "from the right-of-way" should begin at the right-of- way line and not at the edge-of-pavement or curb. As a result, this may include sidewalks, canals, or other infrastructure that are included within the designated right-of-way boundary.Additionally, this could include sidewalks, canals or local roads that abut the collector or arterial road. See the examples below for a graphic depiction of the ROW area and how to perform this measurement. 61 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Text strikethrough -. -- - . -- -.-leted Bold text indicates a defined term — Example of an Arterial Road ROW 1 -W. - iPirk*' -Witwoori.,, ,...,:piiii ,..,4/1 4, i . . „ ,_., it _ , ., , „ ,„„_. t i No Arterial Road ROW _._ _.._ r -- .. -_ r Edge of pavement • Measure from , ROW Boundary I k _ _ $, t Project Site ,. �.. i *1 * * .1 .‘,# . -- 1 ' ' illr5i / I , ,. 4,4 ,,,,, 0 - , ,..,.. , ._, ... 4 . , . ... e . ,,,,„,„. Legend . . - ROW Boundary Property Boundary 62 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Bold text indicates a defined term Example of how to measure from the ROW . :„ , "ok i. r 1, yak Project Site r .. 1 • 4- 4 z t t 141, tis t : : x. i. ,. -. Local Road ROW Arterial or Utility Easement ROW Collector Road, including all4111110 Arterial Road ROW rrr ROWs rr- : 41r+ Ir. , 44N4, 4111P , SOF- 1'r �`a Lege 1 "" fi° ROW `Boundary Property Boundary 63 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to bedeleted added Text strikethrough is current text tot beb Bold text indicates a defined term Example of how to measure from the ROW Local Road ROW_ Project Site j a « . f y [ !+ de..�,_.�:�r� ;tom . r t Local Road ROW - .... o _ \ .tivt , ,,•, _ O . Q �; : CU 41..c.:,0 Measure from {r ROW Boundary 3 ;a . .h..., _,... ,, .. ` ilk ,. ,t,"- C $ -dam ` $ u Arterial Road ROW Milk • ' IIIIIIIIO x Legend ROW Boundary ._ 3 Property Boundary 64 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2Wrchitectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term LDC Amendment Request ORIGIN: Growth Management Department Staff AUTHOR: Growth Management Department Staff and the Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad Hoc Committee which consists of the following individuals: James Boughton, AIA Rocco Costa, AIA Kathy Curatolo, CBIA Dalas Disney, AIA Bradley Schiffer, AIA Dominick Amico, P.E. DIVISION: Growth Management Department AMENDMENT CYCLE: Independent Cycle LDC SECTION(S): 2.03.06 Planned Unit Development Districts 4.02.12 Design Standards for Outdoor Storage 4.02.16 Design Standards for Development in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area 4.02.37 Design Standards for Development in the Golden Gate Downtown Center Commercial Overlay District (GGDCCO) 4.02.38 Specific Design Criteria for Mixed Use Development within C-1 through C-3 Zoning Districts 4.05.02 Design Standards 4.05.04 Parking Space Requirements 4.05.09 Stacking Lane Requirements 4.06.02 Buffer Requirements 4.06.03 Landscaping Requirements for Vehicular Use Areas and Rights- of-Way 4.06.05 General Landscaping Requirements 6.06.02 Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements 6.06.03 Streetlights 10.02.15 Requirements for Mixed Use Projects within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area CHANGE: 1. The proposed amendment updates existing cross-references to LDC section 5.05.08 in the following LDC sections: a. 2.03.06 d. 4.02.38 b. 4.02.16 e. 4.06.03 c. 4.02.37 f. 10.02.15 2. The proposed amendment adds new cross-references to LDC section 5.05.08 in the following LDC sections: '1 65 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term a. 2.03.06 g. 4.06.02 b. 4.02.12 h. 4.06.03 c. 4.02.38 i. 4.06.05 d. 4.05.02 j. 6.06.02 e. 4.05.04 k. 6.06.03 f. 4.05.09 REASON: 1. Several cross-references to LDC section 5.05.08 exist which must be updated to reflect changes proposed by the Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad Hoc Committee (Committee). 2. During the Committee's review of LDC section 5.05.08, the Committee recommended better coordination of site design standards and other architectural requirements with standards located in other sections of the LDC, and also received public comments supporting additional cross-references. As a result, several cross-references have been added throughout the LDC to improve awareness of related provisions or additional standards for projects which are subject to architectural standards. These added cross-references are for information purposes only and do not affect the applicability of the architectural standards in LDC section 5.05.08. Please see the proposed amendment drafted by the Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad Hoc Subcommittee for more information. DSAC-LDR RECOMMENDATIONS: No changes, approved unanimously on November 3, 2015. DSAC RECOMMENDATIONS: No changes, approved unanimously on December 2, 2015. FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS: There are no anticipated fiscal or operational impacts associated with the following amendment. RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: LDC section 5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: There are no anticipated growth management plan impacts associated with the following amendment. OTHER NOTES/VERSION DATE: Prepared by Jeremy Frantz, Senior Planner, 5/23/16 Amend the LDC as follows: 1 2.03.06 Planned Unit Development Districts 2 3 G. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Center PUD Design Criteria. 66 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 3. Pedestrian Pathways. For projects subject to architectural design standards, see 3 LDC section 5.05.08 F. for related provisions. 4 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 5 6. Building Foundation Plantings. 6 a. Building foundation plantings shall be required per LDC section 4.06.05 7 BC.4., ofthe-Sedc except as follows: The building regardless of its size, 8 shall provide the equivalent of 10 percent of its ground level floor area, in 9 building foundation planting area. A continuous building foundation 10 planting width is not required per LDC section 4.06.05 BC.5.a. of the 11 Code. However, the foundation plantings shall be located within 21 feet of 12 the building edge in the form of landscaped courtyards and seating area 13 landscaping. For projects subject to architectural design standards, see 14 LDC sections 5.05.08 E.-F. for related provisions. 15 7. Building Architectural Standards. 16 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 17 b. The following architectural options are in addition to the list of required 18 design treatments features identified in LDC subsection 5.05.08 BD.2.-ef 19 the Code. 20 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 21 9. Parking Requirements. Mixed-use projects have the opportunity to provide a 22 variety of parking options to residents and patrons and remove parking areas as 23 the focal point of the development. Mixed-use projects reduce vehicular trips, 24 and thereby reducing the number of parking spaces, by utilizing pedestrian- 25 oriented design and reducing the distance between residential and commercial 26 uses. 27 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 28 e. Parking Structures. For projects subject to architectural standards, see 29 LDC section 5.05.08 E. for related provisions. 30 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 31 10. Service Areas. For projects subject to architectural standards, see LDC section 32 5.05.08 F. for related provisions. 33 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 34 35 4.02.12 Design Standards for Outdoor Storage 36 A. All permitted or conditional uses allowing for outdoor storage, including but not limited 37 to storage of manufactured products, raw or finished materials, or vehicles other than 38 vehicle intended for sale or resale, shall be required to screen such storage areas with a 39 fence, or equivalent landscaping or combination thereof, not less than seven (7) feet in 40 height above ground level. Said fence or wall shall be opaque in design and made of 41 masonry, wood, or other materials approved by the County Manager or designee. For 42 projects subject to architectural design standards, see LDC section 5.05.08 F. for related 43 provisions. 44 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 45 46 4.02.16 Design Standards for Development in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment 47 Area 48 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 49 D. Building Types and Architectural Standards 50 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 51 3. General Architectural Standards. 67 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2Wrchitectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term r-. 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 f. Deviations from exterior building color. Applicants within the Bayshore 3 Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment District boundaries may 4 request a deviation from the exterior building color requirements of LDC 5 section 5.05.08 GD. A deviation request shall be subject to the 6 procedures established in LDC section 5.05.08G and shall be subject to 7 the following criteria: 8 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9 h. Awning: 10 i. For awnings spanning less than 25 percent of a façade, an 11 applicant may request a deviation from the color restriction 12 identified in section 5.05.08 C.11. D.10.c.iv. These deviation 13 requests shall be subject to the procedures established in section 14 5.05.08-PG. following the review and approval by the CRA 15 Advisory Board to ensure consistency with CRA goals and 16 objectives and community character. 17 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 18 19 4.02.37 Design Standards for Development in the Golden Gate Downtown Center Commercial 20 Overlay District (GGDCCO) 21 A. Development criteria. The following standards shall apply to all uses in this overlay 22 district. Where specific development criteria and standards also exist in the Golden 23 Gate Area Master Plan, or the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management 24 Plan, these standards shall supersede any less stringent requirement or place additional 25 requirements on development. 26 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 27 15. Project standards. In addition to the site design elements described in section 28 5.05.08 G-5.dF.1. of the Code, all projects shall provide: 29 a. Two accept or specimen trees, above the minimum landscape code 30 requirements, for every 100 linear feet along both the front and rear 31 façades, at a minimum height of 18 feet at planting, except that projects 32 with frontage along Golden Gate Parkway shall only be required to 33 provide the planting along the rear façade. 34 b. Decorative landscape planters or planting areas, a minimum of 5 feet 35 wide, and areas for shaded seating consisting of a minimum of 100 36 square feet. 37 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 38 39 4.02.38 Specific Design Criteria for Mixed Use Development within C-1 through C-3 Zoning 40 Districts 41 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 42 C. Commercial Mixed Use Design Criteria. Projects utilizing the Commercial Mixed Use 43 option within a C-1, C-2, or C-3 Zoning District shall comply with the following standards 44 and criteria. 45 4. The project shall provide street, pedestrian pathway and bike lane 46 interconnections with adjacent properties, where possible and practicable. For 47 projects subject to architectural design standards, see LDC section 5.05.08 F. for 48 related provisions. 49 50 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 51 I. Building Architectural Standards. 68 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 21Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term 1 1. The Mixed Use Projects shall include architectural features that provide visually --� 2 interesting building design at a scale appropriate for pedestrian and automobile. 3 a. Building facades shall be designed to reduce the mass and scale of the 4 building, by providing arcades, windows, entry features, and other 5 design treatments in compliance with section 5.05.08 of the LDC except 6 as follows; 7 b. Covered pathways and arcades shall be constructed with columns a 8 minimum width of 12 inches, if masonry and 10 inches wide, if 9 constructed of finished steel products. 10 c. For buildings 3 stories or more, pedestrian scale at the street level shall 11 be maintained by incorporation of façade variations such as massing, 12 texture, color or material on the primary facades between the first and 13 subsequent stories. 14 d. The following architectural options are in addition to the list of required 15 design treatments features identified in subsection 5.05.08-GD.2. of the 16 Code: 17 i. Open arcade or covered walkway with a minimum depth of 8 feet 18 and a total minimum length of 60 percent of the facade. 19 ii. A building recess or projection of the first floor with minimum 20 depth of 8 feet and total minimum length of 60 percent of the 21 facade length. 22 iii. Architectural elements such as balconies and bay windows with a 23 minimum depth of 3 feet and that cover a minimum of 30 percent 24 of the façade above the first floor. (Storm shutters, hurricane 25 shutters, screen enclosures or any other comparable feature, if 26 applied as part of the structure, must also comply with the 27 required minimum depth). 28 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 29 30 4.05.02 Design Standards 31 32 D. Parking lots shall be so lighted, if lighted, as to shield streets and all adjacent properties 33 from direct glare, excessive light, and hazardous interference with automotive and 34 pedestrian traffic. For projects subject to architectural design standards, see LDC 35 section 5.05.08 F. for related provisions. 36 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 37 38 4.05.04 Parking Space Requirements 39 A. Requirements for off-street parking for uses not specifically mentioned in this section 40 shall be the same as for the use most similar to the one sought, or as otherwise 41 determined by the County Manager or designee pursuant to 4.05.04 of this LDC it being 42 the intent of this LDC to require all uses to provide off-street parking, unless specific 43 provision is made to the contrary. For projects subject to architectural design standards, 44 see LDC section 5.05.08 F. for related provisions. 45 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 46 47 4.05.09 Stacking Lane Requirements 48 49 Where stacking is required, the amount listed does not include the first vehicle being serviced. A 50 minimum of five (5) spaces shall be provided preceding the first menu board or order station, for 51 restaurants with drive-in windows. For all other stacking uses, stacking starts ten (10) feet 69 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term .-. 1 behind the middle of the pickup window) and is computed at twenty (20) feet per vehicle (turns 2 are computed at twenty-two (22) feet per vehicle, measured at the outside of the driveway). 3 Stacking for one (1) lane may be reduced if the reduction is added to the other lane(s). For 4 projects subject to architectural design standards, see LDC section 5.05.08 F. for related 5 provisions. 6 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 7 8 4.06.02 Buffer Requirements 9 10 A. Applicability of buffer requirements. The buffering and screening shown in table 2.4 11 below shall be required under this section and shall apply to all new development. 12 Existing landscaping which does not comply with the provisions of this section shall be 13 brought into conformity to the maximum extent possible when: the vehicular use area is 14 altered or expanded (except for restriping of lots/drives), the building square footage is 15 changed, or there has been a discontinuance of use for a period of 1 year or more and a 16 request for an occupational license to resume business is made. For projects subject to 17 architectural design standards, see LDC section 5.05.08. for related provisions. 18 19 Subdivisions or Developments shall be buffered for the protection of property owners 20 from land uses as required pursuant to this section 4.06.00. Buffers shall not inhibit 21 pedestrian circulation between adjacent commercial land uses. Buffers shall be 22 installed during construction as follows and in accordance with this section 4.06.00: 23 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 24 25 4.06.03 Landscaping Requirements for Vehicular Use Areas and Rights-of-Way 26 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 27 B. Standards for landscaping in Vehicular Use Areas. For projects subject to architectural 28 design standards, see LDC section 5.05.08 F. for related provisions. 29 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 30 9. Landscaping required for section 5.05.08 Required landscaping for buildings 31 over 20,000 square feet shall be pursuant to LDC section 5.05.08. 32 The following requirements will be counted toward the required greenspace and 33 open space requirements of this Chapter of this Code. 34 a. Trees in vehicular use areas must be a minimum of 14 to 16 feet height 35 with a six-to eight-foot spread and a three-to four-inch caliper and must 36 have a clear trunk area to a height of six feet. 37 b. The first row of landscape islands located closest to the building front 38 and sides must be landscaped with trees, palms, shrubs and 39 groundcovers and must have a clear trunk area to a height of seven feet. 40 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 41 42 4.06.05 General Landscaping Requirements 43 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 44 B. Landscaping requirements for industrial and commercial development. For projects 45 subject to architectural design standards, see LDC section 5.05.08 F. for related 46 provisions. 47 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 48 C. Building foundation plantings. All commercial buildings, residential buildings with 3 or 49 more units, and retail and office uses in industrial buildings shall provide building 50 foundation plantings in the amount set forth in table 4.06.05.C. and illustration 4.06.05.C. 51 These planting areas shall be located adjacent to building entrance(s), primary 70 I:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Bold text indicates a defined term 1 façades, and/or along façades facing a street. For projects subject to architectural 2 design standards, see LDC sections 5.05.08 E.-F. for related provisions. 3 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 4 5 6.06.02 Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements 6 7 A. All developments must construct sidewalks, bike lanes, and pathways, as described 8 below. For projects subject to architectural design standards, see LDC section 5.05.08 9 F. for related provisions. 10 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 11 12 6.06.03 Streetlights 13 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 14 B. At the entry/exit of any residential or commercial development approved through a 15 SDP, SDPA, or PPL located on a public collector or arterial street, the following 16 additional standards shall apply. For projects subject to architectural design standards, 17 see LDC section 5.05.08 F. for related provisions. 18 19 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 20 21 10.02.15 Requirements for Mixed Use Projects within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle 22 Redevelopment Area 23 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 24 B. MUP Deviations. 25 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 26 2. List of Development Standards Eligible for Administrative Deviation Requests. 27 MUPs shall be eligible to seek an administrative deviation from the following LDC 28 provisions: 29 a. Front Setback. 30 i. These deviation requests shall be subject to the process and 31 procedures of LDC sections 5.05.08-FG.1.-2. and the submittal 32 requirements established in the Administrative Code, except that 33 in order to be eligible for an administrative deviation the site shall 34 meet at least one of the following conditions or circumstances: 35 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 36 b. Architectural and Site Design Standards. These deviation requests shall 37 be subject to the process and procedures of LDC sections 5.05.08. G. 38 1.-2. and 5. and the submittal requirements established in the 39 Administrative Code. 40 c. Landscape and Buffer Requirements. The alternative plans requesting 41 approval for deviation from landscaping and buffer requirements shall be 42 subject to the process and procedures of LDC section 5.05.08. FG.1.-2. 43 and the submittal requirements established in the Administrative Code. 44 Further, the applicant must additionally provide a minimum of 110 45 percent of the open space requirement for mixed use projects in addition 46 to other conditions that the County Manager or designee deems 47 necessary. 48 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 71 l:\2014 LDC Amendment Cycle 2\Architectural Ad Hoc Committee\Materials for 6-2-16 Planning Commission\Full Packet 5-26- 16.docx H Iv O t0 a o 'a N U v 00 CO E N E N N C N L N N v) 13 C a = _0 Lip 0 C (Ya - a-i U 1 y ct >. rsi lD ID U a) N C a) m O M 0 O to O p� v t ar C N N C t p C V O p c c C C G V� 11j O i lD E In p O i_ tri ,-• O CIA CU O a O 0.0 O L N H O O *4-.... a Cs cu O y (p an tZ O C in E a1 • E N i C v l0 L pap C 0 <n C O a) a tu 40 is v-c > o o cCU aa "' ° a o s •C v G U 0 O cu N N O C) in +' a� N vv) U in Q� (� Cr; N as •0 C U v `n E U co — v cN 3 L E cu � u - o E 3 0 VI CC cc N • n3 O x y p I° 'j C C -o i v U a) cu -03v c 0) a) co 13 -0 ti 4 E v `�° c s t °v; o c y vOi ° E E C Q ,L ON •c +.. +' 0 _ v O m -p 'a co C C N .0 O Li-i' C p a u p .L CU CU in CO CO o N coEO N d .0 d Q W li d > CC ( • Y Li N = p lD L a) ^ N L ei Ni Mca a0 H H --i Q I— Ll 4- V) I—LE ON d U co I0 _ L O u1 ori w Ua N C o C o N E L 0 U 'a ry O N O N ~ E Q m y v y 41 in N o in N U I i pE 'o ; o' C E m > E E CJ 0 0 v v o 'c as o ,E aa)i m V O p a 0:1U 0. ca U a > Z CL ccu C 0 Q 3 0 co N ut U1 to tf) to Ca! O `~ e I a 10 e •t a }1 cc a N0 N 0 000 > 'O O N cn E 0 M > nn y C la 'C C C >• M1 m 3 L v) Cu L to C vi y) C ++ Q o E -0 d 0 .0 CCO > O pbp t O y o VI u t > s E t v, v O a O C fl cOa > Q N cc Z Q a z 3 3 w .n r ca .) Z m 3 Z E 4-I L U - U L u o v = co C a) U v v 3 -0 E > _, `° 0 O 0 c 0 v 3 0 o O Q C E v) E v a) Y '7) Y >; '� o v O In +� m +' o Iri v) c C o +- a) 4-- a, U) C C a) L 0. , O a) a) �, — -p vi ,) c in O O a) U I— a) c u N O c6 3 0 = v O_ E -C �, :n -0 -a un -0In a- C 0- v E 9 � U � M Q. a E O o -0 „ ,a3 c_ , , a) as C o -o a) '= o .E aY) ami C a"i o O G1 Q c p O . o Y 13 Q O a) E m 0 c c c E O a) L E (a fa fa U 4-- U V F- (a U (tea va v+' ,n in H CO ._ YO vv)i CO OU fl. 41 0 g N a) y 0C CO +�.• 0 O U 'E" cc) 2 O fa N c cc 2 N Q- N -J CO fl Y Q .'_ NO 0 -0 C Q o (a o a) aYO EU u � p) i � 2 a.' U U O N Ln Oao � ,,, 2v a) o -0 0) CO . 'O Y 'O E U C VI ur-' u u a) V La) a) (a • Ca) a) aC O Y -6 E O '+_ LYNECC = C CO QU N "00 0 O a) O E �' U 4_ U O < Q (n in U cn < (n (n O Q CO CO In N cn v, L N 0J .4- %-.1 %-i cV 5 N K 20'WATER BODY (LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT) 5'REAR(ACCESSORY) SETBACK 4 - 10'REAR 0'REAR(ACCESSORY) (PRINCIPAL) SETBACK SETBACK CORNER LOT — H H SECONDARY FRONT ( SETBACK(10'MIN) 10'REAR (PRINCIPAL) GrOT WIDTH VARIE1 SETBACK , (45'MIN) a NON- LAKE LAKE p LOT LOT 0 SIDE SETBACK SIDE SETBACK (5'MIN) 0 (5'MIN) \10'PUE TREE ' TREE N f O n w � co FRONT(STREET)SETBACK 20'MIN* FRONT(5'SIDEWALK)SETBACK 23'MIN* a m EDGE OF PAVEMENT U t SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED TYPICAL LOT DETAIL o SCALE:1"=40' J O 0 f0 m 0 t X W w O m O WALDROP BUCKLEY MPUDENGINEERING U CML ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE O SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED LOT DETAIL 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE-SUITE 305 BONRA SPRINGS,FL 34735 P.239-405-7777 F:239-405-7899 EMAIL:iMo@weWrvpenSUneerin6-cow (�.'G ,l tQ GC-PG Mt' .A-ssaad VC\ F5. 1 '.. )1 ...a...i t,..) a • r--, ,,„. '-."•• > m i:?. 1c7 = ^% cf* c> 0 < x , -• cc ......4., ,.-4.4, ,..., - ai, •—t. =,...: :4, 0 ' .. * ....• 7-1. LA r) -Cti ,--4- -. ch 0 - 1: 0 -- 5gY:1' 2 11 D %.' ,-•••• ,...4,1 r-1. 1,... i lir• /1) tp,. ' ,--1, ft) •-..1 3- 13 I I CZ C) P 0 1 I .- H -I Cr '"- > ..-+ ...-..-" 0 (31 A Z en-s ri .... 014' a - - rr Xl k.....i,...., 0 oy -- ;a n i 3 ' ' . * 101, - Cr ,4r• '-'m -- -c.. i a . = =- t 12 G q . .., . .4::,.. ...., _. -11 ,_,• 0 Co # :5" ...-- • . ...% 40.* ...4 4 M 12 g ,...) . - . .r, 0 '1' 4 It 1....}.. -4 M .' ......4 Lel in . III *••••• r-1 r-t- CO X1 Pa , , 0..... P ..""i — 8 -T, E-- 4$:,X cr . a In ul 0 i VLi "54 w • ,••••• CA ED 1:4 p•-,-, pi =,„,f-^- 6 _.(P ( ......) -, ••••t• •..• ,,,, •-•• 0 -.... 0 E• = ,--f) #•••• 0 ... ......... • in 8 E.1: — , .3., . ,...., o--. 8 4F, F ro V i J rD P Ca 0 .0. • 4.4 C) •••,..,.• t G 0 D....—. -41, Ca H. 0 CI C a "4• iai ,..".• W 0 0 -.. 4' • 0 a ...., .,-,,,. I