Loading...
Agenda 04/26/1990 S PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA APRIL 26, 1990 Special meeting of the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting on Thursday, April 26, 1990, 3:00 p.m. at the Administrative Office in the Golden Gate Community Park Community Room in Naples, Florida. I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Tigertail Vegetation 1. Purpose: To review options and make recommendations to the 41) Board of County Commissioners relative to removal of the vegetation at Tigertail Beach. IV. Adjournment rtd:002259 C 0 PARAB SPECIAL MEETING 04/26/90 SUBJECT TAPE # SIDE TIME ZONE The first 20 Minutes of this meeting was lost, because the cassette tape was eaten by the recorder. I. Call to Order 1 A 00.0--<> II. Pledge of Allegiance 1 A <>--<> III. Tigertail Vegetation 1 A <>--37.2 Staff Comments 1 A 00.0--15.2 Public Discussion 1 A 15.3--18.1 Mr. Kim Kobza's Statement 1 A 19.6--23.8 Motion 1 A 36.4--36.6 Second 1 A 36.6 401) Vote 1 A 36.6--37.2 IV. Miscellaneous Old Fnnciness: Item A 1 A 37.3--37.8 Item B 1 A 37.9--38.0 V. Special Events 1 A 38.1--41.9 VI. Beach Parking Permit 1 A 42.0--end VII. Adiournment 1 B 00.0--02.0 rtd:002316 40 4 r'4- C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REQUEST DIRECTION FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIISSIONF.RS RELATIVE TO APPLYING FOR A PERMIT FROM THE STATE FOR REMOVAL OF VEGETATION AT TIGERT iIL BEACH Objective: To obtain direction from the Board of County Commissioners relative to a permit application for removal of vegetation at Tigertail Beach. Considerations: On April 26, 1990, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meet in special session to discuss alternatives for removal of vegetation at Tigertail Beach. At prior meetings residents of Marco Island approached the Parks arra Recreation Advisory Board for solutions to the regrowth of vegetation at Tigertail Beach. PARAB requested a survey be performed of existing conditions at the beach prior to making any recommendation to apply for a permit to remove vegetation. The survey has been completed and is attached for your review. Results of the survey were presented to PARAB at the April 26th, 1990, meeting. Two alternatives were presented for removal of the vegetation project; they are as follows: 1. Cleaning pockets of vegetation totaling 50,000 square feet. This is clearing of several semi-circular areas of vegetation near the mean high water line, basically seaward of the dune crossovers and in heavily used areas by beach patrons. 2. Cleaning of vegetation from mean high water line to a point 25' seaward of the back dune vegetation line (shown on the April 1990 survey) . This is an area of approximately 2,500 linear feet x 150' or approximately 375,000 square feet. With this option, the dune crossovers would be extended 25' seaward. Both these options may require the County to perform replanting of beach vegetation in other areas of the beach. Also, a separate permit for raking of the beach will have to be applied for to keep the areas clear of any regrowth of vegetation. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommended that a permit application be submitted to the State with alternative # by a to vote. Fiscal Impact: Cost of alternative #1 is approximately $3,000. Cost of alternative #2 is approximately $12,000. These estimates are based on using County staff to perform the work. Fluids have not been budgeted in FY 1989/90. Growth Management: None a 411, Recommendation: That the Board of Casty Commissioners provide direction relative to submitting a permit to the State for removal of vegetation at Tigertail Beach. Prepared by Date Murdo Smith, Parks and Recreation Manager Reviewed by Date Cliff Crawford, Parks and Recreation Director Reviewed by Date Kevin O'Donnell, Public Services Administrator 3434 C 0 C PUBLIC SERVICES DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: 24 April 1990 TO: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board FROM: Kevin O'Donnell, Public Services Administrators, RE: Beach Parking Permit z Periodically my office, and I know the Parks and Recreation Department, receives inquiries from citizens about the possibility of obtaining for a fee a annual County beach parking permit to be accepted in lieu of the daily $1. 00 per vehicle charge. Due to the various past problems we have had with any type of permit 4011) system, as previously discussed with this Board, staff has shyed away from any type of permit concept. However, this office is getting continual inquiries, particularly in light of the recent publicity and action by PARAB in regards to the dollar ($1. 00) charge. Therefore; since this is a new angle at which to view the older problem of beach parking, I am going to suggest that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board consider whether or not you wish to have staff further explore this possibility. This can be taken up at your May meeting. Since I believe we could probably handle this item initially through a short discussion process I am not going to have staff prepare any extensive research on the matter. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact this office. KO'D/cms cc: Neil Dorrill, County Manager • Cliff Crawford, Parks and Recreation Director PUBLIC SERVICES DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: 24 April 1990 TO: Barbara Cacchione, Chief of Long Range Planning Michelle Edwards, Planner, Growth Planning ti FROM: Kevin O'Donnell, Public Services Administrator ,O RE: Comment/Immokalee Comprehensive Plan As a follow-up to our previous discussions I have had the opportunity to review for the first time the recreation component of the Immokalee Comprehensive Plan. As I indicated, my major concern is under Policy V, 1. 2, dealing 4:1) with "neighborhood parks" . Currently there is no standard in the Growth Management Plan of the Parks and Recreation Element for neighborhood parks. That was intentional since it was decided during the extensive review process that the County Parks and Recreation Department would no longer be active in the neighborhood park business, instead concentrate its efforts in Community and Regional Parks. We would retain the existing neighborhood parks that the County has and will continue to program activities there; however, we would simply not acquire any new ones. Policy V, 1.2 states that neighborhood parks shall be in designated neighborhood centers wherever feasible and shall be accomplished by such methods, including "the County purchase of land" . That would seem to put us on a collision course with what the County Growth Management Plan specifies. Furthermore, I am not sure of where the money would come from for such an expansion of the "neighborhood park" because the impact fees that are being collected for the Immokalee Community Park District can only be spent for the Community Park facilities. However; many of the facilities that one finds in a neighborhood park the County has been placing in its Community Parks which is part of the reason why we did not feel the public need to maintain a presence in the neighborhood park business. Policy V, 1. 1. Conceptually I agree that such a survey should be done, particularly since the last one was probably done in the • CI) 1980-81 area when the master planning of the Community Parks was undertaken. My question is, who in Collier County shall undertake it. I particularly feel since the Public Services Division with its Parks and Recreation Department has an Advisory Board that if they are not going to be responsible for the surveying work itself they need to play a major role in its formulation. Currently as I have advised you the County and the School District have already entered into an inter-local agreement that allows the Parks and Recreation Department to use recreation facilities on school sites once scheduling conflicts have been resolved with the school and the County undertakes the appropriate maintenance of such facilities. . _ Again, with the advent of our Community Parks system that the County owns, the bulk of our efforts have been over the last three (3) years to program, fund and make capital expenditures in the Community Park system. Although the relationship and utilization of School owned facilities will undoubtedly always be there it is being down played over that last few years, simply to afford the • Deparment the ability to catch up with its facilities on its own land. I would also like to advise you that the Board of County ® Commissioners had approved a three (3) year rehabilitation program to the Immokalee Middle School which the County is in the process of acquiring from the School District in exchange for the Heath Property. This would involve about $600, 000 in County funds that would enhance the overall recreational facilities in the Immokalee area above and beyond what was called for in the Growth Management Plan, which is obviously the current level of service standard the Department is adhereing to. This particular project has been delayed due to the problems the School District has run into in the financing of its new construction projects. From an operational perspective small, little neighborhood sites are not cost effective for the Department to maintain. Within the Immokalee area there is a maintenance staff of six individuals, . inclusive of the Field Supervisor. The staff is responsible for 55. 5 acres of park property on seven (7) sites and seven (7) acres of non-park County property on four (4) sites. The operational expenses associated with maintaining a number of small neighborhood park sites, particularly in areas with large green areas requiring lawn mowing and landscaping, for instance, could not be accomplished under the existing monetary and staffing allocations for the area. If there could be a way to take credit for that acreage into a Community Park setting then perhaps impact fee money could be used for some of those facilities, although I see that as a difficult task because, in essence, we would be asking the Attorney's Office to legally change the definition of a "neighborhood park" into a riimum CO "community park" . It is my understanding that you were going to contact the County Attorney's Office for clarification of this matter. The other goals and objectives within the element are compatible with what the Department is currently providing and what is being called for in the Growth Management Plan. Should you have any further questions in this regard, feel free to contact my office. KO'D/cms cc: Cliff Crawford, Parks and Recreation Director Murdo Smith, Parks and Recreation Manager Neil Dorrill, County Manager Parks and Recreation Advisory Board members areawide drainage system, instead of the smaller individual drainage required South Florida Water Management District and Collier County. RECREATION GOAL V: Provide ample high quality and diverse recreational opportunities for all Immokalee citizens in a cost efficient manner. OBJECTIVE V 1 : Collier County shall implement a park development program that results in a system of parks and facilities convenient to all Immokalee residents, reflect their recreational preference and offer recreational opportunities to all age groups. Policy V 1 . 1 : By 1992, Collier County shall survey residents to assist in the development of a recreation program that meets the needs and characteristics of the Immokalee population. Policy V 1 .2: Have neighborhood parks sited in the designated neighborhood centers, whenever feasible. This shall be accomplished through methods including the County Adr purchase of land, private sector land donations, or through an interlocal agreement between Collier County and the. Collier County School Board. TRANSPORTATION GOAL VI: The future land use pattern shall be supported by a road network that maintains Immokalee's small-town character, yet achieves efficient traffic movement. OBJECTIVE VI 1: The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, motorized and non-motorized vehicles. Policy VI 1.1 : The County shall complete a transportation study for the Immokalee Urban Designated Area by December 1992. Once completed and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners, the Immokalee Master Plan shall be amended to incorporate the transportation study. The study will review existing roadway conditions, identify deficiencies and make recommendations considering all of the following: 6 I Or ♦ 4 C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REQUEST DIRECTION FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RELATIVE TO APPLYING FOR A PERMIT FROM TEE STATE FOR REMOVAL OF VEGETATION AT TIGERTAIL BEACH Objective: To obtain direction from the Board of County Commissioners relative to a permit application for removal of vegetation at Tigertail Beach. Considerations: On April 26, 1990, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meet in special session to discuss alternatives for removal of vegetation at Tigertail Beach. At prior meetings residents of Marco Island approached the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for solutions to the regrowth of vegetation at Tigertail Beach. PARAB requested a survey be performed of existing conditions at the beach prior to making any recommendation to apply for a permit to remove vegetation. The survey has been completed and is attached for your review. Results of the survey were presented to PARAB at the April 26th, 1990, meeting. Two alternatives were presented for removal of the vegetation project; they are as follows: ® 1. Cleaning pockets of vegetation totaling 50,000 square feet. This is clearing of several semi-circular areas of vegetation near the mean high water line, basically seaward of the dune crossovers and in heavily used areas by beach patrons. 2. Cleaning of vegetation from mean high water line to a point 25' seaward of the back dune vegetation line (shown on the April 1990 survey) . This is an area of approximately 2,500 linear feet x 150' or approximately 375,000 square feet. With this option, the dune crossovers would be extended 25' seaward. Both these options may require the County to perform replanting of beach vegetation in other areas of the beach. Also, a separate permit for raking of the beach will have to be applied for to keep the areas clear of any regrowth of vegetation. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommended that a permit application be submitted to the State with alternative # by a to _ vote. Fiscal Impact: Cost of alternative #1 is approximately $3,000. Cost of alternative #2 is approximately $12,000. These estimates are based on using County staff to perform the work. Funds have not been budgeted in FY 1989/90. Growth Management: None C m. 41: Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners provide direction relative to submitting a permit to the State for removal of vegetation at Tigertail Beach. Prepared by Date Murdo Smith, Parks and Recreation Manager Reviewed by Date Cliff Crawford, Parks and Recreation Director Reviewed by Date Kevin O'Donnell, Public Services Administrator 3434 C C .._ . GLAI) 0 BAG_A_THoN A County-Wide Litter Clean-Up & Recycling Effort April 23-28, 1990 BRING A BAG OF FREE HATS & BAGS LITTER & A BAG OF TO ALL PARTICIPANTS RECYCLABLES SPECIAL FEATURE: THE LITTER OLYMPICS 2 TO 4 P.M., APRIL 28, 1990 AT GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY PARK OFF SANTA BARBARA BLVD. As part of the Thank-You Celebration for the HANDS-ON CRAFTS-Children of Glad Bag-A-Thon,the Litter Olympics will all ages will have the opportunity to include a number of contests and giveaways make fascinating and fun craft projects from plus plenty of free food and drink. reusable household items. C u%'Q TRASH SCULPTURE CONTEST— HECTOR'S JUNIOR OLYMPICS— Come and Come and turn trash into not so L - Come join Hector the Garbage "Trashy"artwork,and win prizes doing it. Collector in Collier County's first"Litter Olym- Prizes for winners-fun for all ages! pics."Events will include: aObstacle Course Run I HUMAN CHECKER GAME-24 aTractor Tire Rolling Contest giant checkers made from garbage Refrigerator Box Relay bags will capture,jump,double jump and aAnd Much, Much More! crown one another on a giant checkerboard. Terrific prizes for winners! Register to win a weekend stay at the Ra- disson Suite Beach Resort on Marco Island. LLrr a GUESS THE RECYCLABLES ����`` CONTEST—Come guess how many Other attractions will include skits and plays aluminum cans are in a compacted square, performed by Children for the Arts,Collier how many pounds of cardboard in a bale,and County Recreation Programs, and the 4-H how many tires in the pile, plus much, much Club, plus a pyramid building contest and a more! Grand prize:a weekend stay at the newspaper dance. More than$2,000 worth of Registry Resort. prizes to be given away! e Mr, � sREGST k117"51f--• „„,,� r ..”GeastAYasfd Naples, Florida l 11 • C ON' i CO,, ri Olt 11/47 01 EN. Waste conoate Doh odisson Suite^Resort Recycle CollierManagement, Inc on Marco Island For More Information Call 774-8258 . COLLIER COUNTY GLAD BAG-A THON GENERAL INFORMATION BAG-A-THON EVENT DATE: Saturday, April PARTICIPANTS: More than 1,000 volunteers 28, 1990 (week-long clean-ups April 23 to from various local groups,including neighbor April 28) hood associations,local schools,boy and girl scout troops,civic and church groups. TIME: Clean-ups begin at 9 A.M. on Saturday, April 28. BAG-A-THON PLANS: GLAD Wrap and Bags is donating thousands of Handle-Tie Trash LOCATION: Participants are asked to pick up and Recycling Bags for the clean-up and re- Glad Bag-A-Thon hats and bags at the cycling effort. Waste Management of Collier Golden Gate Community Park,off Santa Bar- County and local recyclers will transport and bara Blvd. (tel: 353-0404) or North Naples handle all bagged litter and recyclables. Community Park, off immokalee Rd. (tel: 566-2637). Each group can choose what MEDIA EVENT: A post-clean-up celebration area of the county they would like to clean. event will be held at Golden Gate Community Areas include public roadways, parks, and Park beginning at 2 P.M. Games, contests, neighborhoods throughout Collier County in- food, and beverages will be featured. An on- cluding Marco Island and Immokalee. the-spot buy-back center will be available for the purchase of recyclables. LITTER DROP-OFF LOCATIONS: 12 different litter drop-off locations will be located PRIZES: Dozens of prizes will be given away throughout Collier County. Ask for a location during the Litter Olympics including a week- map when you pick up your hats and bags. end stay at The Registry Resort and a w9ek- end stay at the Radisson Suite Beach Resort RECYCLING PLANS: Glass, aluminum, and on Marco Island. All participants will receive plastic recyclables will also be collected from free painter's caps and bags for litter and re- April 23 to April 28 and turned in at Golden cyclables. Gate Community Park on the 28th for cash. a Start saving nowl LOCAL SUPPORTERS: Collier County Solid Waste Dept, Collier County Parks and Rec- reation Dept., Waste Management of Collier helps call attention to and address the solid County, The Registry Resort, The Radisson waste disposal issue. In each city, Bag-A- Suite Beach Resort, Bordon Dairy Products, Thon efforts provide a vehicle to encourage WLAZ 93.5 FM, and Coca-Cola Bottling citizens to clean up their city, salvage re- Company. cyclables,and take responsibility for their en- vironment. CONTACT:Keeth Kipp(813)774-8258 • The Collier County Solid Waste Department. the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department, and Waste Management of Collier County wish to thank the following businesses for their generous support: Baskin Robbins Ice Cream Store Horizons Records&Tapes, Inc. California Smoothies McDonald's Restaurants Celebrity Golf Mickey's Pizza&Spagetti House Camelot Music Naples Skatery Inc. Carvel Ice Cream Naples Team Sport Center • Chick-Fil-A Page One Restaurant&Lbunge Churros Mexican Carryout Palm River Country Club Coca-Cola Paul's Donuts'N Coffee Cobb's Town Center 6 Theatres Pewter Mug-Naples Dairy Queen of Naples Pub on Linwood,The Dan's Appliances, Inc. Radisson Suite Beach Resort of Marco Island Domino's Pizza Registry Resort,The Family Hobby Center Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburgers Fruit Yogurt&More West Coast Surf Shop Flamingo's Ice Cream Emporium Western Steer Family Steak House Golden Gate Subway Witch's Brew Restaurant&Lounge Home Tech Services Printed on recycled paper