Agenda 04/06/2016PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION
Municipal Services Taxing & Benefit Unit
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 6, 2016
THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD WILL MEET AT 1 PM ON APRIL 6
AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY, LOCATED AT 8960 HAMMOCK
OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108.
AGENDA
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll call
3. Agenda approval
4. Approval of 3/2/16 Regular Session, 3/21/16 Special Session, and 3/21/16 Beach Renourishment
Committee meeting minutes
5. Audience comments
a. Email received from Serendipity and St. Tropez Associations
6. Mangrove die -off status (15 minutes) (Tim Hall)
7. *Beach Renourishment (30 minutes)
8. Clam Pass dredging update (10 minutes)
9. Landscape easements update (15 minutes)
10. Landscaping costs to maintain Pelican Bay Foundation property (15 minutes)
11. Periodic updates to PBSD Board members (10 minutes)
12. Administrator's report (15 minutes)
a. Street lighting study presentation (time certain 1:30 p.m.) (30 minutes)
b. March financial report
13. Committee reports (15 minutes)
a. Budget
b. Clam Bay
C. Landscape & Safety
d. Water Management
14. Chair's report (10 minutes)
a. Committees
15. Old business
16. New business
17. Adjournment
*indicates action items
ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER ITEM TO ADDRESS THE
BOARD. THE BOARD WILL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUBJECTS NOT ON THIS AGENDA AND ANY PERSON WISHING TO
SPEAK WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE BOARD ENCOURAGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING IN
ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IS MADE,
WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A
DISABILITY WHO NEEDS AN ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THE
PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AT (239) 597 -1749 OR VISIT
PELICANBAYSERVICESDIVISION.NET.
03/31/2016 3:27:15 PM
PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD REGULAR SESSION
MARCH 2, 2016
The Pelican Bay Services Division Board met on Wednesday, March 2, 2016, at 1:00 p.m. at the
Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida 34108.
In attendance were:
Pelican Bay Services Division Board
Susan O'Brien, Chairman
Joe Chicurel, Vice - Chairman
Tom Cravens
Jacob Damouni
Ken Dawson
Pelican Bay Services Division Staff
Neil Dorrill, Administrator
Marion Bolick, Operations Manager
Bohdan Himiak
Peggy Pinterich
Mike Shepherd
Scott Streckenbein
Dave Trecker
Gary Ventress
Mary McCaughtry, Operations Analyst
Lisa Jacob, Associate Project Manager
Barbara Shea, Recording Secretary
Also Present
Mohamed Dabees, Humiston and Moore Adam Northrup, Collier County Procurement
Tim Durham, County Manager's Office Jeremy Stark, Earth Tech Environmental
Tim Hall, Turrell, Hall & Assoc. Chris Stephens, Earth Tech Environmental
Jim Hoppensteadt, Pelican Bay Foundation
APPROVED AGENDA (AS AMENDED)
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll call
3. Agenda approval
4. Approval of 2/3/16 Regular Session and 2/12/16 Orientation/Bus Tour Workshop
meeting minutes
5. Audience comments
a. Status of mangrove die -off (add -on)
6. * Clam Bay monitoring for 2016
7. *Sediment testing in ten water management ponds
8. Irrigation sprinkler checks and maintenance
9. Periodic updates to PBSD Board members
10. Administrator's report
a. February financial report
11. Committee reports
a. Budget
b. Clam Bay
C. Landscape & Safety
d. Water Management
12. Chair's report
a. Landscaping budget
13. Unfinished business — PBSD /PBF Landscaping
1
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session
March 2, 2016
14. New business
a. Election of Chairman & Vice - Chairman to take seats at the April Board meeting
(add -on)
b. Possible Sunshine Law presentation/Ethics Workshop (add -on)
15. Adjournment
*indicates action items
ROLL CALL
All members were present and a quorum was established
CHAIRMAN O'BRIEN WELCOMED NEW COMMERCIAL BOARD MEMBER
JACOB DAMOUNI, DIRECTOR OF RESORT OPERATIONS AT THE NAPLES
GRANDE BEACH RESORT
AGENDA APPROVAL
Mr. Cravens motioned, Dr. Trecker seconded to approve the agenda as amended,
adding items #5a, #14a, and #14b. The motion carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF 02/03/16 REGULAR SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Mr. Cravens motioned, Mr. Dawson seconded to approve the 02/03/16 regular
session meeting minutes as amended. The motion carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF 02/12/16 ORIENTATIONBUS TOUR WORKSHOP MINUTES
Mr. Cravens motioned, Mr. Streckenbein seconded to approve the 02/12/16
Orientation/Bus Workshop minutes as presented. The motion carried
unanimously.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
None
STATUS OF MANGROVE DIE -OFF
Mr. Dorrill reported on his plan to ask the County Manager to go to the Board of County
Commissioners to declare Clam Bay dredging an emergency and seek a waiver of the normal
solicitation process. Photos of the mangrove die -off in Bay Colony were reviewed, pointing to
the urgency of the dredging event. Mr. Durham, County Manager's Office, added that an
emergency declaration would expedite getting a dredger on site and completing the project prior
to turtle nesting season. Mr. Tim Hall, Turrell, Hall & Assoc., stated his expectations of the
issuance of the Clam Bay dredging permit to occur within a week.
CLAM BAY MONITORING FOR 2016
2
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session
March 2, 2016
Mr. Adam Northrup, Collier County Procurement Services, confirmed that a separate
work order, not to exceed $50,000, may be opened for a mangrove restoration task, and
performed by Turrell, Hall & Assoc. This task was not included in the RFQ awarded to Earth
Tech for Clam Bay monitoring.
Mr. Cravens motioned, Mr. Streckenbein seconded to approve the County
contract #15 -6397 environmental and biological studies bid to Earth Tech for
Clam Bay monitoring. The motion carried unanimously.
Dr. Trecker motioned, Mr. Cravens seconded that the PBSD Board direct staff to
advise Earth Tech that Turrell, Hall & Assoc. is to be the lead consultant for
issues regarding mangrove die -off and restoration. The motion carried
unanimously.
SEDIMENT TESTING IN TEN WATER MANAGEMENT PONDS
Dr. Trecker stated his reasons for the implementation of a bi- annual sediment testing
program: (1) to measure the increase in lake sediment over time, (2) to track the level of copper
disposition into the sediment, (3) to track the level of phosphorus in the sediment, (4) to track the
effectiveness of bacterial treatment, and (5) to determine whether the sediment is hazardous
waste, in case of a future sediment dredging event.
Dr. Trecker motioned, Mr. Cravens seconded to approve the bi- annual sediment
testing in ten trial lakes pursuant to the bid of $9,650. The motion carried
unanimously.
IRRIGATION SPRINKLER CHECKS AND MAINTENANCE
Mr. Dorrill reported that the PBSD has three designated irrigation sprinkler
check/maintenance employees. Mr. Bolick stated that he is considering an increase for this
designated manpower to two two -man crews (total of four employees) to be included in his
proposed FYI budget.
PERIODIC UPDATES TO PBSD BOARD MEMBERS
Ms. O'Brien suggested that Mr. Dorrill prepare semi - monthly updates on current PBSD
issues. Mr. Dorrill discussed current informational exchanges at the four monthly committee
meetings as well as his informational emails sent to the PBSD Board members on current
issues /developments as they become available. Ms. Linda Roth commented on how the
Sunshine Law prevents communication and that communication should be a priority. The
Board, by consensus, had no interest in asking for semi - monthly updates.
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
FEBRUARY FINANCIAL REPORT
Mr. Cravens motioned, Mr. Streckenbein seconded to approve the February
financial report. The motion carried unanimously.
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session
March 2, 2016
COMMITTEE REPORTS
BUDGET
Mr. Streckenbein reported receiving the proposed FYI Collier County budget policy and
noted that the PBSD is not under the same constraints as other MSTU's in the county.
CLAM RAV
Ms. O'Brien expressed her desire to schedule a special PBSD Board meeting to approve the
Clam Bay dredging construction drawings when they become available. Mr. Dorrill reported that no
meeting has been scheduled since the drawings are not expected to be completed before the end of
March. Mr. Dorrill is targeting the 03/22/16 BCC meeting to request a Clam Bay emergency
declaration.
LANDSCAPE & SAFETY
Dr. Chicurel reported that the Landscape & Safety Committee met on February 22 and the
following items were discussed and /or acted upon.
1. Ms. McCaughtry reported on Mr. Dorrill's planned meeting with the Covenant Church of
Naples as a potential off site location for car carriers to load and unload Pelican Bay residents'
vehicles.
2. FY16 budget increases for PBSD operations (e.g. landscaping manpower) have definitely
made a positive impact on our ability to maintain our landscaping. Mr. Bolick reported that more
funds are needed in the FY 17 budget for optimum maintenance.
3. Re- landscaping continues to improve line of sight issues along Pelican Bay Blvd. and Gulf
Park Drive.
4. Mr. John DAquanno, Pelican Bay resident, asked us to improve the line of sight at the
Pebble Creek crosswalk, and to ask the CCSO to monitor and enforce the moving violations of
motor vehicles at this crosswalk.
5. The Chairman reported on his meeting with the PBF's Strategic Planning Committee
liaisons. The PBF's goals for beautification and the appearance of Pelican Bay are in complete
congruence with the newly adopted PBSD's Landscaping Goals and Guidelines. In addition to a
proposed yearly review of Pelican Bay's appearance, the L &S Committee plans its own independent
survey of Pelican Bay's landscaping and hardscape in order to guide its Operations Dept. as to the
wishes and needs of the community.
6. Mr. Ventress identified a lighting issue along the Oakmont lake Pathway; the Foundation
will be informed of this issue.
7. After committee discussion, consensus was for staff to explore the rules and regulations of
placing traffic informational signs that indicate that the law requires vehicles to allow 3 feet between
their vehicle and a cyclist they are passing.
Dr. Chicurel provided an update on Mr. Dorrill's meeting with the Covenant Church of
Naples. The church's administrator was receptive to providing a drop off area for Pelican Bay
residents' vehicles and would prefer an agreement with the church being named as an "also insured"
in
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session
March 2, 2016
on the county's insurance certificate. Mr. Dorrill will continue his dialogue with the church and
work toward a Fall 2016 target start date.
WATER MANAGEMENT
Mr. Cravens reported that the Water Management Committee approved the recommendation
for the sediment testing bid. He also reported sharing the PBSD's water management techniques to
combat algae (since the ban of copper sulfate) with a resident of Beachwalk.
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
LANDSCAPING BUDGET
Ms. O'Brien suggested that the PBSD explore other landscaping services options to
achieve the same level of landscaping services in Pelican Bay. A document titled "PBSD
Landscaping," prepared by Ms. O'Brien, was reviewed and added to the record.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS — PBSD/PBF LANDSCAPING
The Board discussed the draft landscaping easement, approved at the February 2016
Board meeting, and landscaping agreements which could be made with the five private parties in
Pelican Bay for which the PBSD has performed landscaping for many years. Ms. O'Brien
provided a document titled, "PBSD /PBF Landscaping" which discussed many aspects of this
issue, which was added to the record. Mr. Dorrill asked the Board to provide direction on
methodology to quantify landscaping costs, if compensation from these five entities will in fact
be sought. Mr. Dorrill advocated the legal necessity for an easement for PBSD landscaping
work performed on private property. The Board tabled this issue.
NEW BUSINESS
ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE - CHAIRMAN TO TAKE SEATS AT
THE APRIL PBSD BOARD MEETING
The consensus of the Board was for the newly elected Chairman and Vice - Chairman to
take seats at the April 6, 2016 PBSD Board meeting.
Mr. Cravens motioned, Dr. Trecker seconded to nominate Mr. Dawson to serve as
Chairman of the PBSD Board. The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Cravens motioned, Dr. Chicurel seconded to close the nominations for
Chairman. The motion carried unanimously.
Dr. Trecker motioned, Mr. Dawson seconded to nominate Mr. Streckenbein to
serve as Vice - Chairman of the PBSD Board. The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Cravens motioned, Dr. Chicurel seconded to close the nominations for Vice -
Chairman. The motion carried unanimously.
5
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session
March 2, 2016
POSSIBLE SUNSHINE LAW PRESENTATION/ETHICS WORKSHOP
Mr. Cravens requested staff to obtain the Florida Sunshine Law informational DVD's
available from the County Attorney's Office for the new PBSD Board members. Ms. O'Brien
offered to distribute her one page summary of the Sunshine Law. Mr. Dorrill offered to provide
a future meeting with Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney, on Sunshine Law upon
request by any Board member.
ADJOURNMENT
11 The meeting was adjourned at 3:40 n.m. 11
Susan O'Brien, Chairman
Minutes approved [] as presented OR [] as amended ON ] date
C
PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD SPECIAL SESSION
MARCH 21, 2016
The Pelican Bay Services Division Board met in Special Session on Monday, March 21, 2016, at
4:00 p.m. at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida
34108.
In attendance were:
Pelican Bay Services Division Board
Susan O'Brien, Chairman
Joe Chicurel, Vice - Chairman
Tom Cravens
Jacob Damouni
Ken Dawson
Bohdan Hirniak
Peggy Pinterich (absent)
Mike Shepherd
Scott Streckenbein
Dave Trecker
Gary Ventress
Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Mary McCaughtry, Operations Analyst
Neil Dorrill, Administrator Lisa Jacob, Associate Project Manager
Marion Bolick, Operations Manager (absent) Barbara Shea, Recording Secretary
Also Present
Gary Canino, Pelican Bay Foundation
Dave Cook, Pelican Bay Foundation
Mohamed Dabees, Humiston and Moore
Jim Hoppensteadt, Pelican Bay Foundation
Mary Johnson, Pelican Bay Foundation
Robert Naegele, PB Property Owners Assoc.
Kathy Worley, Conservancy of SW Florida
APPROVED AGENDA (AS PRESENTED)
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll call
3. Agenda approval
4. Audience comments
5. *Review of the Clam Pass construction plans and specifications
6. Adjournment
*indicates action items
ROLL CALL
Ms. Pinterich was absent and a quorum was established
AGENDA APPROVAL
Mr. Cravens motioned, Dr. Trecker seconded to approve the agenda as presented.
The motion carried unanimously.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Special Session
March 21, 2016
Mr. Dave Cook, Pelican Bay Foundation Board, requested that the PBSD Board address
the issue of a 400 foot stretch of beach immediately south of Clam Pass which is not scheduled
to receive beach renourishment or sand from the Clam Pass dredging event.
REVIEW OF THE CLAM PASS CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Dr. Mohamed Dabees provided and update and responded to questions on the final Clam
Pass construction plans and specifications. In response to a question from Mr. Dave Cook, Dr.
Dabees stated that the County will consider additional renourishment of the beach immediately
south of Clam Pass, based on observations subsequent to the dredging event. Ms. Kathy Worley
expressed her concerns on the mixing zone, protection of sea grasses, and turbidity monitoring.
Mr. Jim Hoppensteadt, Pelican Bay Foundation President, confirmed that there was a
consensus of the members of the Pelican Bay Foundation who were present that they were in
agreement with the construction plans. As a result, he stated that a letter of approval of the
construction plans from the Pelican Bay Foundation would be issued.
Dr. Trecker motioned, Mr. Cravens seconded to approve the dredging plans as
presented. The motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
11 The meetine was adiourned at 4:48 n.m. 11
Susan O'Brien, Chairman
Minutes approved [I as presented OR [ ] as amended ON [ I date
PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION
BEACH RENOURISHMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
MARCH 21, 2016
The Beach Renourishment Committee of the Pelican Bay Services Division met on Monday,
March 21 at 1:30 p.m. at the SunTrust Bank Building, 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 302, Naples,
Florida 34108. In attendance were:
Beach Renourishment Committee Bohdan Hirniak
Dave Trecker, Chairman Susan O'Brien
Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Mary McCaughtry, Operations Analyst
Neil Dorrill, Administrator Lisa Jacob, Associate Project Manager
Marion Bolick, Operations Manager (absent) Barbara Shea, Recording Secretary
Also Present
Dave Cook, Pelican Bay Foundation Board
Ken Dawson, PBSD Board
Jacob Damouni, PBSD Board
Mike Shepherd, PBSD Board
APPROVED AGENDA (AS PRESENTED)
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll call
3. Agenda approval
4. Audience comments
5. Pelican Bay beach renourishment
6. Other business
7. Adj ournment
ROLL CALL
All members were present and a quorum was established
Mr. Hirniak motioned, Ms. O'Brien seconded to approve the agenda as presented.
The motion carried unanimously.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
None
PELICAN BAY BEACH RENOURISHMENT
Dr. Trecker provided a brief history of the beach renourishment responsibility of the
PBSD and a summary of 2016 beach renourishment options based on current Collier County
Pelican Bay Services Division Beach Renourishment Committee Meeting
March 21, 2016
policy and the current survey of Pelican Bay beach widths from markers R -31 to R -41. Dr.
Trecker stated that Gary McAlpin, Manager of Collier County Coastal Zone Management, is
recommending advance beach renourishment with an expectation of no new additional
renourishment for three years.
Renourishment options discussed were, (1) Do nothing, (2) Bring widths at R-35 and R-
36 back to 100 feet at a cost of approximately $400,000, (3) Bring widths at R -35 and R -36 back
to 118 feet (includes advance renourishment) at a cost of approximately $800,000, and (4) Bring
widths everywhere back to 100 feet at a cost of approximately $480,000 or include advance
renouw
Ishment at a cost of approximately �i1,1OU,000.
Dr. Trecker motioned, Ms. O'Brien seconded to recommend to the full PBSD Board
to approve renourishment of the Pelican Bay beach from between R34 and R35 to
between R36 and R37 to the 100 foot width at a cost not to exceed $400,000. The
motion carried unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 2:05 p.m.
Dave Trecker, Chairman
Minutes approved " as presented OR " as amended ON [ ] date
2
Agenda Item #5a
Page 1 of 2
SheaBarbara
Prom: "john thomas" <jg1homas84@gmail.com>
To: naplessusanPrcn.com, "Bill Ale" <blale msn.com >, "Barbara Fournier" <fournieb @gvsu.edu >,
"Louise Windsor" <wwindsor1(a_)gmail.com >, "Jeff Henderson" <jhender3(d7icloud.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 5:22:22 PM
Subject: Grande Noise
Because your Boards Function is to "manage ambient noise" in Pelican Bay, members of St Tropez
and Serendipitys' Board request that you put us on the agenda for a discussion about the noise, smell
and light issues emanating from the Grande Hotel that affects the quality of life in our end of Pelican
Bay. We have documented this issue going as far back as 2008. We ask only that our commercial
neighbors are held to the same standards that we are held to in Pelican Bay.
3oard Functions, Powers, and Duties
he Collier County Board of County Commissioners created the
lelican Bay Municipal Services Taxing and Benefit Unit, and the
lelican Bay Services Division Board to advise the
'ommissioners on important issues that pertain to Pelican Bay
esidents by enacting Ordinances 2002 -27, 2006 -05, 2013 -19,
ind 2013 -61 as amended.
"The Unit is
formed for the
purpose of
providing street
lighting, water
management,
beach
renourishment,
ambient noise
management,
extraordinary
law
enforcement
service and
beautification,
including but
not limited to
beautification
of recreation
facilities,
sidewalk, street
and median
areas,
identification
markers, the
maintenance of
conservation or
preserve areas
including the
restoration of
the mangrove
forest preserve
and to finance
the
landscaping
Agenda Item #5a
Page 2 of 2
beautification
Of Only that
portion of U.S.
41 from Pine
Ridge Road to
Vanderbilt
Beach Road in
the above -
described
taxing and
benefit unit and
to that end
shall possess
all the powers
to do all things
reasonably
necessary to
provide such
services. The
Unit will be
solely
responsible for
advising the
County on
dredging and
maintaining
Clam Pass for
the purpose of
enhancing the
health of the
affected
mangrove
forest, and will
manage such
activities for the
County. "
(Section Four,
Ordinance
2013 -61, p. 1).
-he Pelican Bay Services Division ( "PBSD ") Board meets
egularly on the first Wednesday of each month at 1 PM at the
,ommunity Center at Pelican Bay located at 8960 Hammock
yak Drive, Naples, Fl, 34108.
Current Members
Susan O'Brien, Chairman* I Resident 1239-592-
5329 1 naplessusanQrcn.com ( Term expires 3/31/2018
Joe Chicurel, Vice Chairman* ( Resident 1239-231-
2024 ichicurel@gmail.com I Term expires 3/31/2017
Tom Cravens I Resident 1239-594-8256 1 nfn16799@naples.net
Term expires 3/31/2017
Jacob Damouni I Commercial /Business) 239 -594-
6003 1 idamouni (o- )naplesgrande.com I Term expires 3/31/2017
John G. Thomas
Home (978)- 342 -2191 Cell (508)- 922 -3753
Fla (239)- 593 -0231 Skype jgthomas51
Agenda Item #7
Page 1 of 18
TO: PBSD Board of Directors
FROM: Dave Trecker
SUBJECT: Pelican Bay Beach Renourishment
DATE: March 28, 2016
The Beach Renourishment Committee met on 3/21/16 and unanimously
passed the following resolution:
To recommend the PBSD board approve renourishment of the Pelican
Bay beach from between markers R -34 and R -35 to between markers R-
36 and R -37 to a beach width of 100 feet at a cost not to exceed
$400,000.
Here is the background.
The Board of County Commissioners assigned responsibility for
renourishing the Pelican Bay beach to the PBSD in 2013 (Attachment 1).
Terms, spelled out in Attachment 2, include acceptance of county design
standards. (Implicit is the intent of PBSD to piggyback on countywide
renourishment projects in order to save money.)
State statute defines a public beach in terms of access to the public. All
beach is public below mean high water. Above mean high water, beach is
"public" within one -half mile of public access.
For Pelican Bay, that means the beach is "public" from the end of Vanderbilt
Beach Road to about R -33 (see Attachment 3). The county funds
renourishment for that portion of the beach. The PBSD is responsible for the
portion of the beach from the half -mile mark to Clam Pass — that is, from
about R -33 to just south of R -41.
Past county policy called for annual renourishment, if needed, to a maximal
width of 100 feet from the R markers seaward. This year, Coastal Zone
Management is proposing to supplement that with advance renourishment to
offset anticipated future erosion.
Attachment 4 gives data from the January 2016 beach survey and
Attachment 5 compares Pelican Bay beach widths in 2015 and 2016. Note
Agenda Item #7
Page 2 of 18
that erosion is most prominent at R -35 and R -36, the Foundation's widely
used "Marker 36" beach area.
The Beach Renourishment Committee considered a number of options.
(1) No nothing. Deal with the erosion next year if necessary. A possible
downside is that the county, because of advance renourishment this year,
may do no renourishment next year. If so, continuing erosion at R -35 and R-
36 might present the costly option of our having to go it alone in 2017.
(2) Piggyback on the county project this year and bring the width from
between R- 34/R -35 to between R- 36/R -37 back to 100 feet. That would
require about 10,000 cu. yd. of sand and cost about $400,000. (We currently
have $400,000 in our beach renourishment reserve.) This is the
recommended option (Attachment 6).
(3) Bring width at between R- 34/R -35 to between R- 36/R -37 to 118 feet.
That would include advance renourishment, require about 20,000 cu. yd. of
sand and cost about $800,000.
(4) Bring widths along the entire "private" beach back to 100 feet. That
would require about 12,000 cu. yd. of sand and cost about $480,000 or, with
advance renourishment, about 29,000 cu. yd. of sand and cost about $1.15
million.
The board will be asked to make a decision at its April 6 meeting.
Gary McAlpin, head of Coastal Zone Management, needs a decision from
the PBSD by April 15. Actual beach renourishment is scheduled to begin
November 1.
Agenda Item #7
Page 3 of 18
r x
ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -61
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2002 -27,
AS AMENDED, WHICH CREATED THE PELICAN BAY MUNICIPAL
SERVICE TAXING AND BENEFIT UNIT, BY AMENDING SECTION
FOUR, PURPOSE AND POWERS, TO CLARIFY THAT BEACH
RENOURISHMENT IS ONE OF THE PURPOSES OF THE UNIT;
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR
INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on May 28, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners (Board), adopted
Ordinance No. 2002 -27, which superseded, repealed, and consolidated prior ordinances relating
to the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit ( "Unit'); and
WHEREAS, the Board subsequently amended Ordinance No. 2002 -27 by adopting
Ordinance No. 2006 -05, Ordinance No. 2009 -05, and Ordinance 2013 -I9; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to further amend Ordinance No. 2002 -27, as amended, in
order to clarify that beach renourishment is one of the purposes of the Unit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SECTION FOUR OF ORDINANCE NO. 2002 -27,
AS AMENDED.
Section Four is hereby amended as follows:
SECTION FOUR: Purpose; powers.
The Unit is formed for the purpose of providing street lighting, water management, beach
renourishment, ambient noise management, extraordinary law enforcement service and
beautification, including but not limited to beautification of recreation facilities, sidewalk, street
and median areas, identification markers, the maintenance of conservation or preserve areas
including the restoration of the mangrove forest preserve and to finance the landscaping
beautification of only that portion of U.S. 41 from Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road in
the above - described taxing and benefit unit and to that end shall possess all the powers to do all
things reasonably necessary to provide such services. The Unit will be solely responsible for
advising the County on dredging and maintaining Clam Pass for the purpose of enhancing the
health of the affected mangrove forest, and will manage such activities for the County.
Words Underlined are added: Words are deleted,
Page I of 2
Agenda Item #7
Page 4 of 18
SECTION TWO: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY.
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other
applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstit-utional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion.
SECTION THREE: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES.
The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or
relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article,"
or any other appropriate word.
SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall be effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, this Z day - , 2013.
ATTEST: ; .; ,:,.. BO
DWIGI�T %:-8R0CI6; CIerk CO
K
By: _ By:
Attest as to Chaitfii M C, ) Cle
' COMMISSIONERS
,FLORIDA
ESQ.
This ordinance filed with the
Secretary of State Office th
day of
and acknoMedcF:ment o thor
filing re erved this _ d-y
of
E3y a�,p„rvtro:e�
Words Underlined are added, Words S4iiel ,r an are deleted.
Page 2 of
ATTACHMENT 2
July 7, 2014
Gary McAlpin, Director
Coastal Zone Management
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Dear Gary:
Agenda Item #7
Page 5 of 18
At a recent meeting, you told me county funds could not be used for
renourishing portions of the Pelican Bay beach beyond a half -mile public entry
point — in this case the western terminus of Vanderbilt Beach Road. You said
the section from marker R -33 to Clam Pass would be the responsibility of
Pelican Bay.
Please be advised the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD) will assume
responsibility for sand renourishment of that portion of the Pelican Bay beach.
Based on county surveys, the PBSD will, on an annual basis, designate which
sections within those boundaries should receive sand and will fund the
designated renourishment.
To that end, the PBSD Board of Directors passed the following resolution:
The Pelican Bay Services Division acknowledges its authority, as directed
by ordinance, to determine annually an acceptable level and disposition of
sand renourishment for the Pelican Bay beach for which it is responsible,
this renourishment to be consistent with county design standards and
available PBSD funds.
Please let the PBSD know when the county is planning its annual
renourishment activities. We will coordinate with you any sand placement that
may be warranted on the sections of the Pelican Bay beach for we have
responsibility.
Agenda Item #7
Page 6 of 18
Pelican Bay Services Division Board of Directors
Dave Trecker, Chairman
cc: PBSD Board of Directors
Neil Dorrill, Administrator
Collier County Board of Commissioners
Leo Ochs, County Manager
Jim Hoppensteadt, Pelican Bay Foundation President
Agenda Item #7
ATTACHMENT 3 Page 7 of 18
ATTACHMENT 4 ~� VIII-2 K* R6l 8
i -z
IM
Projected Sand Requirements
s
CL
+
[�i A
+
O
`
p
Q
W p
Q
N
Column #
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
d
o
W
-Fill
Weighted
112016
Width
2016
Net
Upland
Total
Project
Projected
a
}
FDEP
Effective
3 Year
Beach
less
Advance
Advance
Volume
Volume
Volume
Beach
Mon.
Distance
Erosion
Width
Des. Std.
Volume
Volume
Loss -Feb.
Req'd
Req'd
Width
(Feet)
(C Y13 Yrs)
(Feet)
(Feet)
(C Y)
(C Y)
(Cr
(C Y)
(C Y)
(Ft)
R -22
145
-506
105
5
173
-333
-182
-514
120'
R -23
1,013
-3,533
107
7
2,037
-1,496
-1,268
-2,764
116'
t
R -24
1,070
- 3,732
112
12
3,210
-522
-1;427
-1,948
119'
m
o
R -25
1,033
-3,603
98
-2
-693
-4,296
-2,053
-6,349
116
Q
R -26
989
-3,449
117
17
5,058
1,609
-2;611
-1,002
- 30,577
120
R -27
1,095
-3,817
98
-2
-564
- 4,401
-2,795
-7,196
123
R -28
1,026
-3,577
108
8
2,203 ;
-1,374
-2;530
-3,904
122`
R -29
942
3;286
109
9
2,289
-997
-2,781
-3,778
124
R -30
1,033
-3,603
113
13
4,033'
430
-3,550
-3,121
123
R -31'
1,022
-1,676
123
23
6,964
5,289
-3,564
1,704
2,294
R -32
1,012
-1,659
119
19
5,869
4,210
-3,621
589
a�
R -33 '
1,022
-1,676
102
2
734:
-942 •
-3,727
-4,669
115
rn
R-34
1,012
-1,659
94
-6
-1,911
-3,571
- 3;759
-7329
117
ri
c'
R -35
998
-1,637
83
-17
15,186"
-6823
-3,950
110,773,
- 33,921
118
R -36
764
-1,253
81
-19
- 4,355'1
-5,607
-3,209
-8
119
a
R -37
264
-434
91
-9
- 790
-1,224
-1,110
-2.34
118'
R -38'
102
Notes
R -39
107
'Provided by CBI
a
Q
R -40
115
"Based on
the 200512006 Fill Template
E
Z
R -41-
146,
"'Based on
the available
volume seaward
of the
design beach
width
ro
v
R -42 °
53
between +4 NA VD (2013 berm elevation) and the
nearshore profile
R -43
47
closure.
R -44
438
- .1,373
70
-15
-2,842 '
-4,215
-4,215
92
R -45
1,078
-3,379
84
-2
-571
-3,950
(0_
- 3,950
- 12,514
94
R-46
1,040
3,262
82
-3
- 1,087
-4,348
°
"4,348
95
R -47
953
-2,989
104
19
4,505
1,516
1,516
1,948
m
R -48
1,000
-3,136
96
11
3,567
431
431
R-49
1,077
=3,376
90
5
1,910
-1,466
0
- 1,466
-1,466
93 '.
co
CI)
T -50
1,208
-3,787
115
30
12,884
9,097
F
9,097
9,821
R -51
1,108
-3,473
97
12
4,197
724
724
a
R -52
967
-3,032
86
1
i 244
-2,788
d
-2,788
"3,128
96
R -53
1,060
-3,322
96
- 11
2,982
-340
-340
97
T -54
729
-2,286
114
29
6,610
4,324
4,324
4,324
U -55
121
zR
-56
153
North of Doctors Pass
T -57
167
R -58A
517'
-2,248
40
-60
- 11,363'
- 13,611
- 13,611
112
R -58
790
3,433
103
3
813
-2,620
-2,620
-8,701
11'!
R -59
1,033
-4,491
115
15
3,827
-664
-664
118
R -60
1,081
-4,700
98
-2
-717 r
-5,417
-5,417
116
R -61
1,049
-4,559
138
38
11,463
6,904
6,904
6,904
T -62
1,015-
- 4,410
102
2 '-
819
- 3,591
-,- 3,591 -
113
R -63
967
-4,204
113
13
4,292
88
88 -
-9,649
113
R -64
854
-3,713
91
-9
-2,433
-6,146
-6,146
113
T -65
804
-3,495
112
12
3,860
365
365
E
R -66
813
-3,533
127
27
9,291
5,758
0
5,758
m
^
R -67
805
-3,497
171
71
21,627
18,129
18,129
v
R -68
810
-3,521
166
66
22,867
19,346
19,346
�
CO
T -69
805
-3,498
137
37
12,457
8,960
2
8,960
142,063
z
R -70
800
-3,479
133
33
10,824
7,345
CO
71345
R -71
803
-3,491
139
39
13,933
10,442
b
10,442
R -72
808
-3,510
170
70
25,349
21,838
21,838
R -73
814
-3,537
178
78
27,381
23,844
5
23,844
R -74
803
-3,490
187
87
29,526
26,037
CO
26,037
R -75
795
-3,456
115
15:
2,118'
-1,339
-1,339
2,545
124
R -76
799
-3,475 `
111
11 --
2,268'
-1,207
-1,207
116
R -77
782
-3,399
119
19
4,099
699
699
699
R -78
659
-2,866
101
1
188
-2,678
-2,678
-4,920
114'
R -79
276
-1,202
89
-11
-1,040
-2,242
-2,242
112
Grand Total:
- 107,420
Agenda Item #7
Page 9 of 18
ATTACHMENT 5
PELICAN BAY BEACH WIDTHS*
* Width is from R marker seaward. The R marker is often 10 -20 feet
behind grass- covered dunes.
Feb. 2015
Jan. 2016
R -31
131 ft.
123
R -32
129
119
R -33
105
102
R -34
95
94
R -35
94
83
R -36
90
81
R -37
95
102
R -38
104
102
R -39
110
107
R -40
125
115
R -41
193
146
* Width is from R marker seaward. The R marker is often 10 -20 feet
behind grass- covered dunes.
ATTACHMENT 6 Agenda Page 1Item 0 of 18
til
Agenda Item #7
Page 11 of 18
Agenda Item #7
Page 12 of 18
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Obtain a recommendation for approval of the 2016 Collier County Beach Renourishment Plan and
make a finding that this item promotes Tourism.
OBJECTIVE: Obtain a recommendation for approval and concurrence to proceed with the 2016
Collier County Beach Renourishment Plan, which includes a five (5) year sand supply
solicitation, a Request for Proposal (RFP) for engineering services to obtain a Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Notice to Proceed (NTP) and concurrence of
expected timing, costs and permit restrictions.
CONSIDE1tATIONS:
The 2016 Collier County Beach Renourishment Plan has been developed by staff and includes:
1 2016 Beach Renourishment - The physical beach surveys conducted in
January /February 2016 indicated that the Vanderbilt Beach, the Park Shore Beach and
parts of the Pelican Bay Beach need renourishment in 2016. The beach width
measurements and three years of advanced renourishment placement Nvas included in the
calculations and indicate that Vanderbilt Beach (R22 -R30) will require approximately
30,000 CY's (cubic yards) of renourishment; Park Shore Bcach (R44 -R53) will require
25,000 CY's to 30,000 CY's of renourishment; and the Pelican Bay Beach will require
approximately 34,000 CY's of renourishment. No renourishment is recommended for
the Naples Beach (1158- R79). The area south of Doctors Pass will be renourished when
Doctors Pass is dredged when the installation of the Erosion Control Structures is
complete. These quantities have been confirmed by an independent Peer Review
consultation.
Preliminary discussions with the Beach Committee Chairman of the for the Pelican Bay
Services Division indicated that a more realistic renourishment quantity that the Services
Division is willing to compensate the County for would be approximately 7,500 CY's to
10,000 CY's. No sand will be placed on the Pelican Bay Beaches without an executed
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) outlining the terms and conditions of the Pelican
Bay beach renourislunent.
Based on this analysis, staff is recommending that the County proceed for planning
purposes with a project to be built after November 1, 2016 using truck haul construction
and either off road vehicle transport on the beach or sand fluidization and pipeline
transport. The sand fluidization and pipeline transport placement approach is being
considered to enhance public safety and will be. bid as an option. Stated quantities will be
used for planning and bidding purposes and will be adjusted prior to construction during
the pre- construction survey that the contractor performs.
Agenda Item#7
Page 13 of 18
•
Cost to complete this work with engineering, sand supply, transport, beach placement,
Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) and certification is expected to be $3M to
$4.5M after reimbursement of the Pelican Bay Y renourishments costs.
2. Five(5)year Sand Supply Contract and engineering support—Staff is recommending
that the County bid a 5 year sand supply contract for supply of approximately 50,000
CY's per year for a total placement over a 5 year period of 250,000 CY's. The supply
contract will be awarded based on"At-Beach"pricing utilizing a mine price per ton plus
a specified transportation price of$.20 per ton per one way haul miles. This will assure
that Collier County receives the best overall price of sand delivered to our site. The
average grain size will also be increased to .4min from .33mmn to utilize more
commercially available sand that still meets the requirements of our FDEP permit. A
larger grain size will also hold a steeper angle of repose and better withstand erosion.
An engineering Work Order(WO)not to exceed $12,000 will be required to develop the
specifications, Quality Assurance Plan and bid package to complete this work.
Proceeding with the engineering to develop the sand supply contract is critical to
completion of this task and recommended by staff.
3. Engineering Services — The renourishment of beaches in this plan will result in
construction costs in excess of $2M and require a RFP solicitation for engineering
support. Staff will proceed with the development of an engineering services package to
include design, specifications, construction drawings, procurement support, a Notice-to-
Proceed,
and project certification. Consultant selection will be based on qualifications
however the estimated cost for this work is not expected to exceed $130,000 and be
reimbursable on a time and material basis. This cost is included in the $3M to $4.5M.
This solicitation will be consistent with previous truck haul beach renourishment projects
that the County has performed in the past.
4. Sugden Park Lake renourishment — The Sugden Park lake shoreline will be
renourished with 10,000 CY of beach quality sand in the sailboat launch area, the main
park beach, and the water ski beach/stands area. Restoration of inland lakes may be
funded with tourist development tax funds with a finding that the project promotes
tourism. This project is part of the beach renourishment program and will be funded
using Fund 195. To fund this project with Fund 183 funds would be inconsistent with the
definition of beach park facilities and it has been defined by the County based on
historical expenditures. Sugden Park is an inland lake and not a beach park as .
traditionally defined. Expected cost to be approximately$400,000.
5. Permit Restrictions—Both the United State Army Corps of Engineers(USAGE)and the
FDEP permit restrict sand trucking activities on Corkscrew Road to daylight hours due to
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)concerns of interference with Florida Panther foraging
activities in the twilight hours. This may possibly restrict the number of truck trips a
trucker can complete per day and increase costs. This will depend on the mine selected
to provide sand and approved truck routes specified by the County.
Agenda Item#7
Page 14 of 18
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan
related to this action.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Overall 2016 beach renourishment program as outlined will cost
between $3M to $4.5M including Engineering and CEI services. The sand supply contract
including the engineering to develop the RFP package will cost approximately$750,000 per year
for 5 years. The cost of the Pelican Bay beach renourishment is not included in the $3M to
$4.5M specified costs and will be reimbursed by The Pelican Bay community. The
renourishment of Sugden Park lake shoreline will be approximately$400,000, is not included in
the Renourishment estimate of$3M to$4.5M and will be paid via Fund 195.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: At the March 10, 2016 Coastal
Advisory Committee meeting this item was unanimously recommended for approval by a 7 to 0
vote.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved as to form and
legality. As discussed above,the"restoration of an inland lake to which there is public access as
these uses relate to the physical preservation of the inland lake" is an authorized expenditure of
tourist development funds. Based on the County's Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended and
Funding Policy Resolution No. 13-81,this project is eligible for funding using Fund 195 and not
Fund 183 beach park facilities. Using Fund 183 would be an inconsistent expansion of the
definition of beach park facilities based on the County's historical expenditure. This item
requires a finding that the expenditure promotes tourism and majority vote for approval.—CMG
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the 2016 Beach Renourishment Plan and
make a. finding that this item promotes tourism.
Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning,
Impact Fees and Program Management Division,Growth Management Department
Attachments:
1) 2016 Beach Renourishment Sand Analysis •
•
•
Agenda Item#7
Page 15 of 18
COLLIER COUNTY BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECT
METHODOLOGY
DEP PERMIT 0222355-001-JC Mod(012-JN)
USACOE Permit SAJ-2003-12405 Mod(MOD-KS)
COLLIER COUNTY
PREPARED BY
HUMISTON&MOORE ENGINEERS
FEBRUARY 2016
This report by Humiston & Moore Engineers (H&M) presents the analysis of a monitoring
survey, conducted in January of 2016 used to estimate the immediate future sand
renourishment requirements based on the design beach width standard established prior
to the 2005/2006 project. This monitoring survey was conducted by Sea Diversified Inc.
(SDI) between January 11th and January 26th 2016 subsequent to the December 2013 and
2014 truck haul renourishment projects for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project.
Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay beaches were surveyed prior to a storm impacting the area on
the weekend of January 16th and 17th while the beaches south of Clam Pass were
surveyed after the storm. In order to document the impact on Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay
beaches, a wading depth survey was conducted on February 13, 2016. Project limits for
this report were based on the monument range information provided in second and third
columns of Table 1 derived from the 2005/2006 nourishment project fill template.
Table 1. Project Monument Range—Design Standard
Project North Limit South Limit Design
Area of Project of Project Standard
Beach (Monument) (Monument) (Ft)
Vanderbilt R-22 R-30.5 100
Pelican Bay R-30.5 R-37 100
Park Shore R-48.5 R-54 85
Naples R-58A R-79 100
A Design Standard beach width and a corresponding fixed baseline were established prior
to the 2006 project. The Design Standard for the beach width from the baseline is shown
in the last column of Table 1. The baseline was set at the seawall, edge of vegetation,
building line or equivalent, at each monument. The beach width was determined by the
distance from the baseline to the mean high water elevation of +0.33 NAVD (+1.61
NGVD) at each DEP reference monument.
1
Agenda Item#7
Page 16 of 18
Projected erosion rates (shown as a negative number by convention) represent the
amount of sand needed in addition to the design beach width to offset the background
erosion anticipated in the respective project area to account for the time period between
renourishment events in order to maintain a beach width equal to or greater than the
Design Standard. These estimates shown in Table 2 for one and three years were
provided by CB&I;the three year rate is used in this analysis.
Table 2. Projected Erosion Rates
*Annual *3-Year
Project Reach Erosion Erosion
(CY/Yr) (CY/3 Yrs)
Vanderbilt(R-22+300 to R-30.5) -9,702 -29,106
Pelican Bay (R-30.5 to R-37) -3,331 -9,993
Park Shore(R-43+650 to R-54+400) -11,138 -33,414
Naples(R-58A to R-79) -27,069 -81,207
*Rates provided by CBI
The sandy beach width from the baseline to the mean high water line was compared to
the Design Standard for each project area to determine the advance volume remaining at
each monument. This volume was calculated using the hatched area as shown in
Figure 1 for beach profiles having widths greater than the Design Standard, and the
effective distance or the distance between the monuments. This volume was deducted
from the 3-year erosion projection to determine the amount of sand needed to offset the
projected erosion rate for a 3-year renourishment interval. in cases where the existing
profile is landward of the design width at the mean high water line then this amount would
be needed in addition to the three year projection.
Figure 1. Typical Profile—Available Advance Volume
TYPICAL PROFILE
(R-23 SHOWN FOR REFERENCE)
t0
EACH WIDT ®AVAILABLE VOLUME OF SAND SEAWARD OF THE DESIGN
i .. BEACH WIDTH BETWEEN +4.0 NAVD (BERM ELEVATION)
AND THE NEARSHORE PROFILE CLOSURE.
6 4.0'NAVD
BERM ELEV.
1/2016
E ODES DESIGN PROFILE WDDTH SHIFTED TO
AT THE
0 w MHWL
1/2016 PROFILE 0.33r—NAVD (Thi -
NEARSHORE PROFILE CLOSURE ``∎
-5
—ID La
ta
co
Z I
—IS
0 200 400
DISTANCE SEAWARD OF MONUMENT(FT.)
2
it
Agenda Item#7
Page 17 of 18
Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay beaches were originally surveyed prior to a storm impacting
the area on the weekend of January 9 and 10, 2016. A wading depth survey was
conducted on February 13 at monuments R-23, R-24, R-26, R-30, R-32, R-34, and R-36
in order to document the nearshore changes as a consequence of the storm activity. The
beach profiles for this survey follow a typical pattern showing upland loss as the profile
slope decreased near the shoreline and there is indication the nearshore bar was
impacted as shown in Figure 3. These upland losses were estimated (Column 10 of
Table 3), added to the projected volumes calculated from the advance volume analysis
depicted in Figure 2 to update the projected sand requirements for 2016 shown in
Table 3.
Figure 3. Typical Wading Depth Beach Profile-February 2016
to SURVEY LEGEND
a,•„� 2016-01 MONITORING SDI
2016-02 MONITORING $01 (WADING-DEPTH)
5_ UPLAND VOLUME LOSS
IMPACT TO NEARSHORE OAR
lL 0 _ NAVU (MHIV)
—5
0 200 400
DISTANCE SEAWARD OF MONUMENT (Fr.)
Table 3 shows the project area(s) shaded in light gray and the reaches with sand losses
in excess of the projected 3-year erosion rate are shaded dark gray. The results of the
advance volume analysis described in Figure 2 are shown in`fable 3: Column 9, and the
results of the upland loss analysis described in Figure 3 are shown in Table 3: Column
10. Columns 11, 12 and 13 show the resultant sand losses by monument, the losses
totaled by reach, and the projected beach width at each monument if the losses were to
be replenished.
3
Agenda Item#7
Page 18of18
Table 3: Projected Sand Requirements I
✓ m o b c b�, b a c:
c< ox � Q1c un + 3n O y1Oa
i o .g4 o g R� 3p 3g ; tea'
Q
'• 2 Column# 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
*ii' 1,0 Weighted 1/2016 Width ""'2016 Net Upland Total Project Projected
4 • FDEP Effective 3 Year Beach less Advance Advance Volume Volume Volume each
e, Mon. Distance Erosion Width Des.Std. Volume Volume Loss-Feb. Req'd Req'd Width
(Feet) (CY/3 Yrs) (Feet) (Feet) (CY) (CY) (CY) (CY) (C (Ft)
7:4: * Sze - �' -: 2 -..„ . -"
eel e m % :Pi
� i i �`
t
a
ro Y f �� F 'a E 1 r p
` bf f S 1""w`w.b-,a.&= f E;'�' i t to �- .: �,_
R-31. 10• 22 1676 123 23 : 6964 5 289- 3 584 1704 2 294
• R-32 1012 1659 119 19 5 869 _ 4 210 3621 4589
C7 £�.�4..&�-„ _ .,,ter=o._ d -=..e. ' ,91W- S -04" 1�aF � WV
a .5 � 60•,: "- .9 }a
nk1 , -,.^x.22 - . : 3'
R-38 102 Notes:
4 R-39 107 'Provided by C8!
t ¢ R-40 115 "based on the 2005/2006 Fill Template
E
R-41 146 ""Based on the available volume seaward of the design beach width
6 R-42 .53 between+4 NAVD(2013 berm elevation)and the nearshore profile
R-43 47 closure.
,'_ g- ; r - , :1
j � d y
• R 47, 853 2;989 104 19 4 505 1516 1816 1948
E R-48 1000 3,136 96 11 3 567 431 `' ` 431 ::
$▪ %fib F V =ri£frt•i f : _bI J ' w r� o g {
ski ` T 50 1208 3 787 115 30 12 884 9 097 9 097 9 821
W R 51 }108 3 473 • 97 • 12 4197 724 na : 724
n PEA s , _ s � 4 ---1- ----�} .� - �� j
T-54. 729 -2,286 114.`. 29 .:' 6,610. r 4.324 C .__.;;:;;::':• :9,324 , ::
..4324 :.
U-55 121
Z
• R-56 153 North of Doctors Pass
T-57 167
r 'fc - i t `
- - -,; , '
R 61 1,049 4559 138 38 11463 6 804:: 6 904 6 904 j
c
MV 0Y 1
T 65 :804 3 495 112 12 3 860 .: 365' ,365
R 86 813 -3,533 ' 427 27 9 291 5 758 ` S 758
311 ° '`o R 67 - 805 -3497 171 7} :21627 18129 -: 18129
A,68: 8}0 A3 1 1 6 66 22 867 19 346 ., 19 346
.::aQ- T 59 805 -3998; '::; 13T 3T: 12 457 8 966.-:'''::':-:''''':-O-;.'''' 960
`' ,133 33 10 824 `- 7 345: 142,063
$:. .... R 70 800 -347$ 7345
`' R 71 803 3 491,r::r.`i' 139 39 13 933 :10 442 ° 10 442
R 72 808 3 510 170 70 25 349 21835.. 21838
R 73 814 3 537 178 78 27 381 23 844 . 23 844
.:
N��W, �'.4 � fil����+✓�.-'`ter �s'� y�t�_�Y��.+)c�,ay�_.�-'�,: � - ` �•
1177: 782 3,399 119 > 19. 4 099 699 699 ''699
Page 4 1° -:lalencd"ta1'W107-? 0:.., _ F I
Agenda Item#10
Page 1 of 1
PBSD costs to do landscaping maintenance on Pelican Bay Foundation property
6.53%PBF with no property interest
Equipment maintenance and fuel usage cost estimate $ 6,112.08
*county labor hours $ 34,652.79
temp labor hours $ 23,161.02
total labor hours $ 57,813.81
Materials $ 21,079.36
$ 85,005.25
24.43%PBF within drainage easements
Equipment maintenance and fuel usage cost estimate $ 22,866.48
*county labor hours $ 129,476.06
temp labor hours $ 86,426.22
total labor hours $ 215,902.28
Materials $ 45,853.83
$ 284,622.59
21.40%PBF within ordinance
Equipment maintenance and fuel usage cost estimate $ 20,030.40
*county labor hours $ 126,117.00
temp labor hours $ 82,108.32
total labor hours $ 208,225.32
Materials $ 40,166.68
$ 268,422.40
*county labor hours calculation includes 38%markup for employee benefits(health,dental,disability,&pension)
Revised 4/4/2016
Agenda Item#12a
Page 1 of 19
LUM1 i [0
T@
[1'P
Prestressed Concrete Octagon Pole
•Pole Weight= 17901bs
•EPA capacity= 11.4 sq.ft.
•Wind speed= 170 mph
'Exposure°C" 1" PVC CHASE
•2010 FBC 1609
•ASCE 7-10
•Gust Factor= 1.2
•Min. Brk.Strength=2,400# 35'
•Concrete=6,500Ibs @ 28 days
•Grd. Wire=#6 str.copper
•Strand= 1/2"@ 70% Ultimate
•Tenon= N/A Side mount
•Color=Natural Concrete
Select Structural LLC
Shawn . Anderson, PE., S.E. NO HAND HOLE
ANDL,"ee,
CO No 53515 = Grade
-13• �� •C 1"PVC INLET
•°° S�4 N A�Ede`'® 5,
3'6"
02/11/2016
PROJECT: Pelican Bay
r v
/Base \
11.31"
(P8")
Agenda Item#12a
Page 2 of 19
Pelican Bay Pole Select Structural LLC
POLE DIMENSIONS WIND LOADING REINFORCING
Total Length 35.0 ft Wind Speed(V) 170 Number Strands 4
Embedment 5.0 ft Exposure Category C Strand Diameter 0.50 in
Projection 30.0 ft Exposure Factor(KZ) 0.85 Strand Area 0.153 in
Tip Dimension in Exposure Factor(KZ)EPA 0.98 Strand Strength 270 ksi
Taper Factor in/ft Directionality(Kd) 0.9 Strand Centroid 2.00 in
Dimension at Ground 10.56 in Gust Factor(G) 1.2 Initial Tension 70%
Butt Dimension 11.32 in Shape Factor(Cr) 0.7 7 0.28
MANDREL CONCRETE Number Dormant 0
Mandrel Dia Tip 2.5 In Concrete fc 6500 psi Reinf Area 0.153 in2
Start from Tip 0 ft Load Factor 1.0 Reinf Strength 270 ksi
Mandrel Taper in/ft Strength Red cp 0.9 Reinf Centroid 2.96 in
Mandrel Dia Butt 6.88 in F3 t 0.65
ATTACHED EPA
Fixture EPA sq.ft.
Mounting Height ft Applied Force i k ult Pole Weight 1790 lb
Wind Pressure
qZ 0.00256 x KZ x Kd x V2 56.52 psf ult CLEPA= 65.40 psf ult
p= qZ x G x Cf 47.5 psf ult pEPA= qZ x G 78.5 psf ult
Moment on Pole
A= 21 ft2
Ad= (tipxproj4)/2+((grd-tip)/2xproj4)/3 282 fe Ppole= 590 lb nom
Mp01e= p x Ad 8.0 ft-k nom 13.4 ft_k ult w= 18 plf nom
MEPA= PEPA x EPA x mounting height 16.1 ft-k nom 26.8 ft-k ult Pepa= 537 lb nom
Kota!' Mpole+MEPA 24.1 ft-k nom 40.2 ft-k ult P= 1127
Moment Capacity of Pole
No.Stressed Strands= 4 No.Dormant=0
Aps= 0.306 in` As= 0 in A'5 0 in
dP 8.56 in d= 7.60 in
pp 0.003385 p= 0 p'= 0
wp 0.114576 w= 0 w'= 0
fps= 254 ksi fps devel= 220 ksi Design fps= 220 ksi
a= 1.15 in
4)Mn= 40 ft-k >Mu
2/19/2016
MNIIIMMONMMOW
.< _ -.. _.
I3gy;e10' _,t y i!
prvinunlik
1111111 '16 1
b` III ,/. L 1
? >1 ■ ; : IN i
�� a°.�?' ,�; '� --mgm"»^ 8�izm s`mR.GFEgym.,1S=:n6 N la
i13°=.71 3 e ♦ $ ;4 >g,H�n=nmmzmmR�m�,t�S�mt1°y o�
ifi!16 a� ♦ ♦ om��` gmaon_ mo�`aos� aQ m 3 a
�� ,?- ipiT s iii
r*Z,; i> �t .tw 4 zg�°xz �yg °s m �Zmxr9�°��an$o° rs `Or 3
III4 4111044111410 11 A
_ PAVV4 11:%*r ,,
,I) &A la 4 iiiii
4ii :$�' n 5�n4ag4s�ssssiiaSi:Aw; li,T��rr T��wrrTTri qt x\`�` ti 'l5.'iiiiF ails i�'.lr>ri6 r '��ri >SFg r�^.
m > as
C7',14§ 'y�r. ,ate, :, ga Na4 4444 .r.rU.d�N °�mit.e .Q _
' ii IA mop to 411, 60-.. E
_To\
.., , i ,
>. • 4 C � :711.‘:0,,_....iiiii/
A 1, 1. co,
"ITV Niii4!paink
It, 4P limm
o m A ,,,
w
iiiii
s1
','/ ,,''f* 0 Will 11 # Al
m iiin Magi ail,.
n o�ui yi: s ` ��
ul CXrri7 • 11•1r � 0 'tO 71 5 = iprovinumooky 4
IOU
1 1 r 1A r yr r "
: 7
0 › .
)
►t c+ ■ �'`, a 1
Z '�
m •
i—i MI sitar 9: ;sr,.
Z 111 airi mildik' . 44,4--■•■ 11
,Wit 40, ,,e,AP'
,-i to II, rw It
i ' ti1ti o
o
�� + pq a 3¢ a H�P G tsto ,4� 6d-03,J- $ Q���gc g A tri
9 ti ~"
Ii co
CD
U Q
M m
up -
m m
ca 3
o t
N
CO CU
=s=g a p,,, • ..
Lg,,,„ .°
I .
.wr 411 ,
lilgli a •` 110111110 '�w,1r1:k.;..-„,,„,-4 0:-.i.F..1 2.- i 011%,Adirjr Ct.i ,
3 I g9 oF,
II „.;. .,,
.0
:1:‘: „ :
vf,n.,r 0 4"0 10 .,:. ‘ :
arn-t& ! iv,- :,,..,p . - TV‘ 411111110.0j..' 40 1011111111114k
> ='_ 47 . `!'..13). ..o44&ha,m th ll
l.l...oi awlle,b 0„ V„,,,,,.::
.4 '
!.,,,,
� y •� ,
V ,. � A `� �
",,�e
�nm anG
� m50 as
Alliff K,= y `�,
k te �, ,.
ii 10 r., ,: ,
RnTz C rCy
-1,-4, .. .
hi-13,3,i , iptork '5. `x.5c ... .
, . v.
-, , ,. e ' 1
m .
� te
rii
10• N. 1p
0.AMA
lireV Ai.-AN. ;” '<.` , - . ip..---
`P oYSz�a0i ''i .,' AWAY; ♦�I® \ e7r_' \ \P' ----- 411W;g. 4 mli,,I, t,,,:.
-,..... 0441042 Wt.:0
91, ,..” 24::„ 4‘P ,,,,
I\ ,..;
I
lit'
0
:;! i:m �� `i
li
„._,,, S.:::,,. . . ';'4., -
do ro 1001, .,,_, ,
d
10 '''';
tt
II .
�
0, 04. ‘ 1101 ,
,,,.‘3r14:".0.,7i,.,:.
, ell I illirr ` m'c:+ -� % , ' .,3rd : '. 1,
litik
..c = ■-3 il UMW ilyAk*" , •„, 17:� � gyd r v....
•
› .<-
2 ._
., YSIIIiii*.:'''''
:Inlikt:* _ °O
AVOW**
„ ..„. „. fip,,:74d-fw.,.'''''-4-31'r'''.7.3 efi'' .
goo _.. t4
0 ....— Cr 4% a.
oil ArAellett 0101.4"f'' •"
•ow ompili„,-- is i v,:;,:%
[: 10u1-4 .1 ._ K:
II LI f,t)::::::::,
z141111, )I-I..k , _ .t 4
F.,„,,,, g ,,,,s,
cog- 4.4:21 1
.., _
_ r ft itAl III 0 pieo:
cm _140,Av . ,-,
.-.<
., ,„
> „,
, ,,v., . ...4pe
,40,,,• - ,........m,
,-.K„Tyr Atib NiteaP 1,
52 in
. , ,Em,_ ,,,,
4"11
9.
M
,f,*
VIM
' ''> a \ ,„,,,y0
a3
O k
N
CO N
!! ;I::JrI r
Ttpw
g.1.,; .1 i lic):;F:',':-:: ::.' '`.0,,, 11100. ,. ,ti..il
• gs > ltnM.
.E 2 $ . e: ; ,,&`, •jjçn \ , � .\ Y/ C
u F4-• ,r3 A shy ,aJ" 4�.
a ��V
3= /
>33s n
T I1 !4, i~ , f„,.... :::,.,`
)
.,,,,,
1:2-.s g ifinto:Ala iii, : ,
,„„
:.4,.:,.
_ k. 1I!!P�� i i,I.,
1111 YONIMMI
'' 1111111111 i g 5,g,:.,• '5->,;:- .■ i 4,i,-i:itet):: 4)). :4“alitififfe, MENU
„. !;.- 2... yak:
ill,m.y 2 CS PuiuliWi-P#f ; 1 i____t_.] ,, .$,_, .:::
cola 12Y �2- ".�
N I
:9 Ij ::;1 r :,...:,
pII. y,'° »spa• .1 ii ilk
0;
0 5 ` , . 'as2 si
41,11W''
, g
V VIEW" :r t
. 'F,... „Nio,:g4W-ik 4 - ,
. 4 .
I :i1.?:11111t.);:ra 'ill A+I
O Wop,... ,z.,3 *4 a
(.1' 0 la*Volt 1111
.,,,,,,s oi:
w , s
10$1.■■■■■I # "OPP /Th
i .,
tz ''-d -7T4AgelhZ ..ii y2 /"3 1 J F �.�t � f
r .a :
I '''..5'24.4". 144"
A rz ¢,•—•1 d . w y� P : - * .
,` a ^ {
r
si*
il
Y ® .®3
..,..„,.. At
' *
. �
�
r4 rd si
V
I � �. �
a
O ;, ,l
4I‘ -':!'.,,,
,�
ir,„„,,,
. .7q . .........,
Li ,,..,.‘
,....... * ,....,
r‘...„ ,,,„,
(i1`•3
PI ; , ,
4111;i1 i: 1
ihriijj,,
°en r
..t,r. ....
e I / 1: 1 253 ,Pc7,,,,,,,,
> ... „ E a 43 -*-------___
z f----,.,,.... fi7 ci• , Be 441p,
U:1 i_ a V ,"-; PD
_ vv
cn 3
O Xk
N
(D N
Agenda Item#12a
Page 6 of 19
OF GARDCO ,``
Project
Location
Site & Area t:at.No
Type
ro. n
Lpii c43 us Qty
PureForm Notes.
, p w k?kC
32`'1osi11g � ,NO
Philips Gardco PureForm luminaires combine LED performance excellence and
advanced LED thermal management technology with a distinct purity of style
to provide outdoor area lighting that is both energy efficient and aesthetically
pleasing.PureForm is defined by its high performance,sleek low profile design
and rugged construction.
Ordering guide example:P32-DIM-A1-130LA-NW-UNV-NP-CLR
Prebx Controls Ann Mounting Optical System' Wattage Color Temp II JVoltage Finish Options
P32 - - - - - - L - =i-
P32- — A16 1 Standard 530rnA CW 120 BRP TL Toot-Less entry and
PureForm Standard luminaire Standard Standard Optic Position_ 215LA Cool White 120V Bronze Paint driver removal hardware
32'fixture DCC 9'Arm 2 2 _ Type 2 360LA 5,700K 208 BLP TB Terminal Block
Dual Circuit Control A2' 29180 3 Type 3 6 O kA 70CRI 208V Black Paint p6 Fusing
DIM Short 2 @90 4 Type 4 (nominal) 240 WP
5'Arm 5M Type 5 Medium 330LA NW LF In-Line/In-Pole Fusing
0-10V Dimming 2090 240V White Paint
A36 SW Type 5Wide 700rnA Neutral PC"" Receptacle with Photocell
APD Decorative 3 BLG Backlight Ctrl White 277 NP (Includes PCR5 receptacle)
ecorave
Automatic Profile Dim. 31x190 2904A
2BL Type 2 with 4,000K 277V Natural Paint
Arm PCB' ` Photocell Button
APD-MRO' 3 @120 backlight(less shield) 70CRI 347 OC
APD with Motion MA 3120 LCL` LEED Corner (nominal) 347V Optional Color PCR5'S"" Photocell Receptacle only
Response Override Mast Arm Specify optional with 2 dimming connections
p Fitter 4 Cutoff Optics WW 480 y s u a
pole mounted sensor Warm White 480V color or RAL PCR7 Photocell Receptacle only
q�90
(requires LCR'' LEED Corner (ex-OC-LGP with 2 dimming and 2
APD-MRI' 2V.,'O.D. W Cutoff Optics 3,OOOK UNV g
80CR1
or auxiliary connections
APD with Motion Mast Arm) Wall Mount 120-277V
Response Override C7pticsRc>ttatc f (nominal) SC
EHHS External NousesideShield
fixture mounted sensor WS I N t i(90 j SOhz/60hz Special color
Wall mount 2-90 Type 2 HVU PTF2 Pole Top Fitter for 2'/a..3'Tenon
Specify,must
MRI including 3-90 Type 3 347-480V supply color chip. PTF3 Pole Top Fitter for 3'-3'/:'Tenon
Motion Response surface SOhz/60hz
at 50%low,luminaire 4-90 Type 4 Requires factory PTF4 Pole Top Fitter for 3V-4"Tenon
mounted sensor conduit BLC-90 Backlight Ctrl quote.
rear entry 2BL-90 Type 2 with SPAT-2 Square Pole Adapter
MR50' permitted backlight(less shield) for use with Al or A2 Arms
Motion Response SPA3'Square Pole Adapter
at 50%low,pole ()Wks Rotal,,1
for use with A3 Arms
mounted sensor Riptrt(770")1O
2-270 Type DL" Diffusing Lens
■ 3-270 Type 3 CLR" Clear Glass Lens
4-270 Type 4 POLY°Polycarbonate Lens
LLC3''' 113 lens for BLC-270 Backlight Ctrl mounted heights 2BL-270 Type 2 with (1 year warranty on lens)
LLC m #4 lens for
25 400'm backlight(less shield) BD Bird Deterrant Spike Kit
ounted heights consist of 25 injection molded
plastic bird deterrent spikes
(field installed only).
1. Available 120-277V only(UNV.120,208, 6. Arm Styles mount to a round pole with 10.See page 8-9 for information on 15.If ordered with DIM.APD,MRI,MR50,
240 8 277). no adapter.If mounting to a square pole, optical rotation prior to ordering. APD-MRI,APD-MRO,dimming will not
2. Available 120V or 277V only.MRSO and specify the Square Pote Adapter option: 11. 33OLA not available in 347 or 48OV. be connected to NEMA receptacle.
APD-MRO require one motion sensor per SPA1-2 for Ai/A2 arms.SPA3 for A3 arms. 12.Available with Al arm or with MA mounting 16.Works with 3-pin or 5-pin NEMA
pole,ordered separately.See page 2 for 7. Available with Al or A2 Arms only.Not only.Provide specific input voltage. photocell/dimming device and auxiliary
Accessories available in P32-MR50.or P32-APD-MRO. 13.Not configurable with 480V. connections are not connected(for future
3 Available 120V or 277V only 8. Luminaire door frame and optic assembly Voltage must be specified use only),
4. Not available with A3 Arm Style. provided standard without glass lens. 14.Works with 3-pin or 5-pin NEMA 17.Option reduces performance.
5. LLC3/LLC4 wireless controls not Specify CLR option for clear glass lens photocell/dimming device.
configurable with PC/PCB/PCR5/PCR7 9 Available with 260LA or 330LA only.
Options.See pages 6-7 for more Info.
PureForm_P32_LEO 11/15 page 1 of 9
Agenda Item#12a
Page 7 of 19
P32 = u re crm LEr,. area u rT r
32" housing
uref orm Accessories ( r ; F ',rat rflf;iSF,},
MS-P M S-A-120 V MS-A-277V
120V or 277V Input Pedestrian 120V Input Area Motion Sensor 277V Input Area Motion Sensor
Motion Sensor For MR50(Motion Response)or For MR50(Motion Response)or
For MR50(Motion Response)or APO-MRO(Automatic Profile Dimming APD-MRO(Automatic Profile Dimming
APD-MRO(Automatic Profile Dimming with Motion Response Override) with Motion Response Override)
with Motion Response Override)
Note:Motion Sensors are ordered separately,with one(1)motion sensor required per pole location for P32-MR50 or P32-APD-MRO luminaires.See luminaire
Configuration Information on page 4-5 for more details.Area motion sensor color Is Arctic White.MRI and APD-MRI luminaires include an integral motion sensor.
Description
Philips Gardco PureForm luminaires combine LED performance LED performance t
excellence and advanced Gardco LED thermal management and life,and to extend
technology with a distinct purity of style to provide outdoor area component life.The door frame is
lighting that is both energy efficient and aesthetically pleasing. die cast aluminum.Luminaires are finished
PureForm is defined by its high performance,sleek low profile design with a fade and abrasion resistant TGIC powdercoat. -
and rugged construction.The die cast aluminum housing mounts PureForm luminaires are available in a wide variety of mountings
directly to a pole or wall,and has a maximum profile of just 3".All LED and arms.
wattages utilize high performance Class 1 LED systems.The luminaire
features a state of the art integral thermal control system to maximize
LED Wattage and Lumen Values
Type 2 Type 2BL Type 3
LED Average Average Average
Ordering Total Current Coto System Lumen Efficacy BUG System Lumen Efficacy BUG System Lumen Efficacy BUG
Cede LEDs (mA) Temp. Watts' Output's (LPW) Rating Watts' Output" (LPW) Rating Watts' Output" (LPW) Rating
215LA 128 530 4000K 208 20,966 101 82-U0-G3 208 23,348 112 64-UO-G4 208 21,177 102 B2-UO-G3
260LA 160 530 4000K 257 26.434 103 B3-UO-G3 257 29.436 114 B5-UO-G5 257 26,699 104 83-U0-G4
290LA 128 700 4000K 287 26,310 92 133-U0-63 287 29,299 102 B4-U0-G4 287 26,574 93 133-U0-G4
330LA 160 640 4000K 326 30.880 95 B3-UO-G3 326 34,388 105 85-U0-G5 327 31,190 96 83-U0-04
Type 4 Type SM Type SW
LED Average ---- —�—_— Average Average
Ordering Total Current Color System Lumen Efficacy BUG System Lumen Efficacy BUG System Lumen Efficacy BUG
Code LEDs (mA) Temp. Watts' Output" (LPW) Rating Watts' Output'-' (LPW) Rating Watts' Output'' (LPW) Rating
215LA 128 530 4000K 207 20.370 82-U0-G3 209 23,689 114 B5-UO-G1 217 25,152 116 B5-U0-03
260LA _.-160 530 4000K 257 25.682 100 B2-U0-G3 258 29.866 116 B5-U0-G2 266 31.703 119 85-U0-G4
290LA 128 700 4000K 286 25.562 89 62-U0-63 288 29,727 103 B5-U0-G2 296 31.838 107 85-U0-G4
330LA 160 640 4000K 326 30,002 92 B3-U0-04 328 34,890 106 85-U0-02 327 36,694 112 B5-U0-64
1. Wattage and lumen output may vary by+/-8%due to LED manufacturer forward volt specification and ambient temperature.
Wattage shown Is average for 120V through 277V input.Actual wattage may vary by an additional+/-10%due to actual input voltage.
2 Lumen values based on photometric tests performed in compliance with IESNA LM-79.
PureForm_P32_LED 11/15 page 2 of 9
Agenda Item#12a
Page 8 of 19
Pt r I F..I ) areTi turninaire area
32" housing
Dimensions `,Ir1tk{i,Irk Il\fItt,: '': j.711t11'11sio11` A"lr 1Al3II(R.,) Din WI ::I". ',<<i.
Top View Top View Top View
/71.711- 1111
......0 _J . ----. .....0°° ---E.7-=
/ _
\ = ,B=9.21" �i�
Agenda Item#12a
Page 9 of 19
y; JtrFo r m I, El i c t.
r a Ea rig i re
32" housing
Dinl(-1li ioi1S lit)f0i (amwlllt 1s s1t=1.I0il((r.tl iin ,+It:;:,ikit,ii:li-,i,,,titr3:<'i)
Top View :i ;l)53 P�yzi.�, Side View End View
t (10234 un) (?3)?c,nj 1
I
6N 1
I 3.,
20.30" (/baam,)
frt —1_
._ � _ .: - 63•' 6.Si••
(51.56 cm) - (it;an)(♦166t onJ
2svaa at--C
i__
Luminaire Configuration Information
P32 P32-MR50 Area PIR Motion Sensor Coverage Pattern:
Philips Gardco PureForm LED standard Philips Gardco PureForm LED luminaire with
luminaire providing constant wattage and motion response,providing a 50%power pp f /� 270°Front Coverage
constant tight output when power to the reduction on low and a commensurate Fl 1� f 1 /F ,
luminaire is energized. reduction in light output.The power and light II >,<l - , Distances are
output reduction is accomplished utilizing the / y approximate.
P32-DCC Philips DynaDimmer module,programmed 90 H height above ground
Philips Gardco PureForm luminaires provided
for a constant 50%power.Power supplied by \ ''. ,N,7--- "eight
with dual circuiting,permitting separate > '
the motion sensor connected to the override
switching of each led array. ,,
line on the DynaDimmer takes the luminaire q t ' 1H 3H 6H
P32-DIM to high setting,100%power and light output,
Philips Gardco PureForm LED luminaire when motion is detected.The luminaire
provided with 0-10V dimming for connection remains on high until no motion is detected Motion response requires that the pole include
to a control system provided by others. for the motion sensor duration period,after an additional hand hole 15 feet above the pole
which the luminaire returns to low.Duration base,normally oriented 180°to the standard
P32-APD period is factory set at 15 minutes,and is field hand hole.For Philips Gardco poles,order the
Philips Gardco PureForm LED luminaire adjustable from 5 minutes up to 15 minutes. pole with the Motion Sensor Mounting(MSM)
with Automatic Profile Dimming.Luminaire option which includes the hand hole and a
is provided with a programmable LED This configuration is not available for use with special hand hole cover plate for the sensor
Driver,programmed to go to 50%power, wall mounted luminaires, with a 1/2"NPT receptacle centered on the
50%light output two(2)hours prior to night hand hole cover plate Into which the motion
time mid-point and remain at 50%for six P32-MR50 is available in 120V-277V input sensor mounts.Once the motion sensor is
(6)hours after night time mid-point.Mid- only to the luminaire.Motion sensors require connected to the hand hole cover plate,then
point is continuously recalculated by the single voltage 120V or 277V input. wiring connections are completed in the
programmable LED Driver based on the pole.The plate(complete with motion sensor
average mid-point of the last two full night The Area PIR motion sensor is the WattStopper attached and wired)is then mounted to the
cycles.Short duration cycles,and power EW-200-120-W(120V Input-MSA-120V)or hand hole.If poles are supplied by others,the
interruptions are ignored and do not affect the the WattStopper EW-200-277-W(277V Input customer is responsible for providing suitable
determination of mid-point. -MSA-277V.)One motion sensor per pole is mounting accommodations for the motion
P32-APD is available in 120V-277V input only. required and is ordered separately.Area sensors sensor in the pole.
require single voltage 120V or 277V input.
P32-APD Dimming Profile: Mounting to a Philips Gardco Pole:
The P32-APD offers many of the advantages Cover Plate with
of a sophisticated control system,including ' 1/2"NPT Coupling
2 hours 6 hours Black,120V _f ,-. (supplied with pole)
100% 100% or 277V Input - Wiring
50% 50% Sensor ,Red Connects in Pole
_._ White,
�' to Override J.._
Neutral
Power On Mid Point Power Off Input(Orange)Line R•,, Motion
of DynaDimmer Sensor
an average energy savings of at least 33% Additional Hand Hole
versus constant wattage,constant light output The area motion detector 15'Above Pole Base Attach Motion
systems,without the need for a control system. provides coverage (oriented 180°to the Sensor to Cover
Y Y equal to up to 6 times the sensor height above
ground,270°from the front-center of the sensor. standard hand hole) Plate coupling,
Complete Wiring
in Pole and Attach
Cover Plate to
PureForm_P32_LED 11/15 page 4 of 9 Hand Hole
Agenda Item#12a
Page 10 of 19
1 It in' F.. rm LE area , inai
32" housing
t titrftinaire Configuration Information `f ,,:!is It r
P32-APD-MRO P32-MRI P32-APD-MRI
Philips Gardco PureForm LED luminaire with Luminaires with Motion Response include a
Automatic Profile Dimming.with Motion programmable LED driver and an outboarded
Response Override.The P32-APO-MRO programmable motion sensor.The motion
combines the benefits of both automatic sensor is set to a constant 50%.When motion
profile dimming and motion response, is detected,the luminaire goes to 100%.The
using the Philips DynaDimmer module.The luminaire remains on high until no motion
luminaire will dim to 50%power,50%light is detected for the motion sensor duration i
output,per the dimming profile shown for the period,after which the luminaire returns to low.
P32-APD.If motion is detected during the Duration period is factory set at 15 minutes.
time that the luminaire is operating at 50%, Available with 120V or 277V(UNIV)only.
the luminaire returns to 100%power and light Luminaires with Integral Motion Sensor-P32-
output.The luminaire remains on high until Luminaires include a passive infrared(PIR) APD-MRI:Luminaires with Automatic Profile
no motion is detected for the duration period, motion sensor,WattStopper FSP-211 equipped Dimming and Motion Response Override
after which the luminaire returns to low. with an FSP-L3 lens,capable of detecting combine the benefits of both automatic profile
Duration period is factory set at 15 minutes, motion within 20 feet of the sensor.180° dimming and motion response.APD-MRI
and is field adjustable from 5 minutes up to around the luminaire,when placed at a 20 luminaires utilize a programmable LED driver.
15 minutes. foot mounting height,or mounted on a wall. The luminaire will dim to 50%power,50%
Available In 120V or 277V input only.Motion light output,per the dimming profile shown
This configuration is not available for use with sensor off state power is 0.0 watts. for APO luminaires(see page 4).If motion is
wall mounted luminaires. detected during the time that the luminaire is
The approximate motion sensor coverage operating at 50%.the luminaire goes to 100%
pattern is as shown below. power and light output.The luminaire remains
Notes: on high until no motion is detected for the
duration period,after which the luminaire
P32-APD-MRO is available in 120V through Side Coverage Pattern returns to low.Duration period is factory set at
277V input only to luminaire.The motion Distances are 15 minutes.
sensor requires either 120V or 277V input to the j'\ approximate. APD-MRI luminaires are available with UNIV
motion sensor. H=height above
ground input voltages only.
The P32-APD-MRO has the same pole APD-MRI luminaires use the identical motion
requirements and utilizes the same motion sensor as MRI luminaires.See motion sensor
sensors as the P32-MR50.The motion sensor
mounts and wires identically as well.The 1H details for P32-MRI.
P32APD-MRO utilizes the Identical dimming 2H
profile as shown for the P32-APD. < ' Note:P32-MRI and P32-APD-MRI luminaires
are only available with the Al Arm,and include
By combining the benefits of automatic profile Top Coverage Pattern an outboarded sensor enclosure mounted
dimming and motion response,the P32-APD- to the arm of the luminaire as shown in the
MRO assures maximum energy savings,and drawings below.
insures that adequate light is present if motion
is detected. /qj A Perth////%////4?
All motion sensors utilized consume 0.0 watts '7 -""1_ Ill(llhi(I/llI(((((in the off state. W
2H
_L__:,. 1\\\\\\\1\, fix:
t D
FSP-211 Sensor-Bottom View
4U ) t
Wwilli 74-
PureForrn_P32__LEO 11/15 page 5 of 9
Agenda Item#12a
Page 11 of 19
P32 PureForrn LED area lurninaire
32" housing
1 unhioaire Configuration Information > ., : II I =iil 1;Ill
P32-LLC3 P32-LLC4
PureForm with Limelight wireless technology PureForm with Limelight wireless technology
Controller pod attached to luminaire arm and Controller pod attached to luminaire arm and
includes radio,photocell and motion sensor includes radio,photocell and motion sensor
with#3 lens for 15-25'mounting heights. with#4 lens for 25-40'mounting heights.
e/it,
i F y
t
a
20' 15' 10 5' 0 5' 10 15' 20'
0'
—2u
f � 1
-i0' 30• 20• 1a 0• f0' 20' 30'
�I 30
—20
lift'
30'
L.urninaire C.onfi uration information P(Ii i :nit ; 1 i ; •'.
IMO
P32-LLC(#) ^�
With this configuration,the controller pod is Controller Pod
mounted to the luminaire arm.One controller is Wireless Radio
required per luminaire.There are three different II -1.8 Watts max(no toad draw)
motion sensor configurations available.Each one ? f'° -Operating voltage 102-277V RMS
corresponds to the desired mounting height of your {i
specific application.See motion response detection �� 1 ii,ti Communicates using the ZigBee protocol
ranges below. l5 I i i -Carries out dimming commands from gateway
-Reports internal PCB temperature
Recommended Sensor by Pote Height 111111.111111111 -Transmission Systems Operating within
j the band 2400-2483.5Mhz.IEEE 802.15.4
-ROHS Compliant
1 t
l I 4I I Photocell Motion Response
1 i I -Ambient light photocell on every -Three different lens configurations
1 wireless radio that averages the motion through passive-
light levels of up to 5 controllers for InfraRed sensing technology
l 1 t an accurate reading and optimal
Connects directly to radio through
light harvesting activity.
modular jack
-Reports ambient light readings to Three different mounting heights
1500 Fc and detecion ranges available
PureForm_P32_LED 11/15 page 6of 9
Agenda Item#12a
Page 12 of 19
P32 PureForm .. ED area I n it
32" housing
i_uminaire Configuration information (t of silt i
(gateway
Overview:One Limelight gateway is included Installation:Gateway has 4 blind threaded Specifications:
with the wireless controls'system.The holes on the back side that accept 10-32
gateway opens up communication with the screws.Mount spacing is 10.41"across and -High density RF Mesh coordinator
wireless radios installed with the PureForm 14.19"vertical. -Ethernet or wireless internet connection
luminaires(or pole),allowing you to control to Limelight server
your fixtures straight from the web.One Requirements:The gateway must be mounted Proprietor of software`rules of operation'
gateway can communicate with up to 800 in a secure on-site location.The gateway
fixtures.Typically one unit is required per requires 120V.Distance of gateway to the first -Watertight Ethernet connections
parking lot. radio varies upon application;contact factory. -Highly protected,long life ac/dc power
Strong internet connection required. supply
-Single board,ARM compliant 520Mhz
Intel computer.
—___ -Operating Temperature-20°C to 55"C
Tamper proof housing
' -Ei
-ll)
�. 30' .r 18U -;
max distance mar distance
Front View Back View Side View
i 4 12" , I-■ 10.4"-0.1 ice– 6"—rj
I (30.48 cm) I (26.4 0n) I i (15.24 cm)
1 – – o O
F 00000
IC 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 ■
00000
®imelighi
twistHDM
15.63" F 0 0 0 0 0 14.2"
IC
(36.8 cm) 00000 0 0 0 0 0 (36 cm) I
0 0 0 0 0
I OOO o ( n
O o 0 0
O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 err
O O
00 'y '
O O
,
I
PureForm_P32_LEO 11/15 page 7 of 9
Agenda Item#12a
Page 13 of 19
P32 Pure Forrn LED area luminaire
32" housing
Asymmetric Optical Orientation Information
Standard Optic Position Optic Irritated L eft(O)Optic Position
Luminaires ordered with asymmetric optical systems in the standard Luminaires ordered with asymmetric optical systems in the Optic
optic position will have the optical system oriented as shown below: Rotated Left(90°)optic position will have the optical system oriented
as shown below:
Left side Right side Left side Right side
of pole of pole of pole '4•■■• of pole
Street Side Street Side
Curbline 90° : 41-- 4 270° Curbline 90° : : 270°
House Side House Side
® ® ,, O O
-0° ^0°
Note:The hand hole will normally be Note:The hand hole will normally be
located on the pole at the 0°point. located on the pole at the 0°point.
Asymmetric Optical Orientation Information
t5pti, 'soot,d itt lat(.qO")t)idi P0,,Ition Ts:io ttttitin.tirs.Ay-strrkrhW-Milk Pottitta 0 Opt c at'Systems
Luminaires ordered with asymmetric optical systems in the Optic Twin luminaire assemblies installed with rotated optical systems are an
Rotated Right(2701 optic position will have the optical system excellent way to direct light toward the interior of the site(Street Side)
oriented as shown below: without additional equipment.It is important,however,that care be
exercised to insure that luminaires are installed in the proper location.
Left side Right side Left side Right side
of pole �10' of pole of pole of pole
/Kb180°,/e5— .s
' * 0\
Street Side Street Side
Curbline 90° °` 27O° Curbline t
House Side /'� House Side
, . t
O° O°
Luminaires with Optic Luminaires with Optic
Note:The hand hole will normally be Rotated Right(2701 are Rotated Left(90°)are
located on the pole at the 0°point. installed on the LEFT installed on the RIGHT
Side of Pole Side of Pole
Note:The hand hole location will depend on the
drilling configuration ordered for the pole.
PureForm_P32 LED 17/75 page 8 of 9
Agenda Item#12a
Page 14 of 19
Pll Pure Form area luminaire
32" housing
Specifications
Housing LED Thermal Management Optical Systems
The PureForm features a die cast aluminum The Philips Gardco PureForm LED provides die The advanced LED optical systems provide
housing,and mounts directly to a pole or cast aluminum integral thermal radiation fins to IES Types 2.3,4 and 5 distributions,as well as
wall.The low profile rounded form reduces provide the excellent thermal management so a Backlight Control optic.Special LEED corner
the effective projected area of the luminaire critical to long LED system life. cutoff optics are also available,both as LCR
significantly.PureForm luminaires supplied (right)and LCL(left.)All optical systems feature
with Al,A2 and A3 arms are provided with arms Wireless Controls unitized lens optic construction.
firmly attached to the main luminaire housing The LimeLight wireless Controls System
body.As a result,the luminaires provide the includes:gateway,controller pod(with wireless Types 2,3,4,BLC and LCR/LCL optical systems
functionality,strength and installation ease utilize an innovative redirecting reflector to
radio,motion response,and photocell),and complement the performance of the LED
of an integral arm luminaire.Mast arm mount com P P
luminaires are provided with the mast arm commissioning/training.LimeLight is er optic.The redirecting reflector system utilizes
an
mounting assembly firmly attached to the main intelligent web-based system that operates 95%specular reflective material to maximize
through a high density mesh(HDM)wireless reflected light forward.Reflector facets
luminaire housing body. g
technology.Wireless radios with motion minimize aperture brightness when viewed
response and photocell sensors are integrated from the rear of the luminaire.
IP Rating with PureForm luminaires,and enable the
PureForm luminaires have a rating of IP66. fixtures to communicate via the ZigBee PureForm luminaires are provided standard
protocol.The gateway is a mini computer without a glass tens,for maximized
Vibration Resistance that connects to the Internet,and is located performance.A glass lens is available as an
PureForm carries a 3G vibration rating that in a secure location.The central limelight option,resulting in reduced performance.
conforms to standards set forth by ANSI C136.31. database channels communication to and All PureForm luminaires provide full cutoff
Testing includes vibration to 3G acceleration in from the gateway,allowing data to be viewed performance.
three axes,all performed on the same luminaire. or managed through the web-based graphical
user interface(GUI).See pages 7-9 for details Listings
Electrical and technical information.
All luminaires bear UL or CUL(where
Luminaires are equipped with an LED driver Full Cutoff performance applicable)Wet Location labels.PureForm LED
that accepts 120V through 277V,or 347V P32 luminaires are DesignLights Consortium
through 480V,50hz to 60hz,input.Driver Full cutoff performance means a luminaire qualified.
output is based on the LED wattage selected. distribution where zero candela intensity
Component-to-component wiring within the occurs at an angle at or above above Finish
luminaire will carry no more than 80%of rated nadir.Additionally,the candela per 1000 lamp
lumens does not numerically exceed 100(10 Each standard color luminaire receives a
current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC fade and abrasion resistant,electrostatically
at 302°F/150°C or higher.Plug disconnects are percent)at a vertical angle of 80"above nadir. applied,thermally cured,triglycidal
listed by UL for use at 600 VAC,15A or higher. This applies to all lateral angles around the
luminaire. isocyanurate(TGIC)textured polyester
Power factor is not less than 90%.Luminaire powdercoat finish.Standard colors include
consumes 0.0 watts in the off state.All motion bronze(BRP),black(BLP),white(WP),and
sensors utilized consume 0.0 watts in the off natural aluminum(NP).Consult factory for
state.Surge protector standard.10KA per AN specs on optional or custom colors.
SI/IEEE C62.41.2.
LED Performance Warranty
Philips Gardco luminaires feature a 5 year
Predicted Lumen Depreciation Data' limited warranty.Philips Gardco LED luminaires
with LED arrays feature a 5 year limited
Ambient Driver Calculated L70 Per Lumen Maintenance
Temperature warranty covering the LED arrays.LED Drivers
p (mA) L7o Hours'•2 TM-212'3 @ 60,000 hours also carry a 5 year limited warranty.Motion
Up to 40'C Up to 800mA >154,000 Hours >51,400 Hours 91",, sensors are covered by warranty for 5 years
by the motion sensor manufacturer.See
1. Predicted performance derived from LED manufacturer's data and engineering design estimates. Warranty Information on www.sitelighting.
based on IESNA LM-80 methodology.Actual experience may vary due to field application conditions corn for complete details and exclusions.
2 L70 Is the predicted time when LED performance depreciates to 70%of initial lumen output. Polycarbonate lenses carry a 1 year warranty.
3. Calculated per IESNA TM21-11.Published L70 hours limited to 6 times actual LED test hours
102015 Koninklitke Philips N.V.Alt rights reserved. 1� "" Philips Lighting,North America Corporation
Philips reserves the right to make changes in specifications PHIL I PS 200 Franklin Square Drive,Somerset,NJ 08873
and/or to discontinue any product at any time without notice 4ri Tel.855-486-2216
or obligation and will not be liable for any consequences
resulting from the use of this publication. Philips Lighting Canada Ltd.
philips.com/tuminaires 281 Hillmount Rd,Markham,ON,Canada L6C 2S3
Tel.800-668-9008
Pu re Form_P32_LED 11/15 page 9 of 9
Sg:t a .! m f ----- •-- cam. ...
5_ ? .. ami
o \�►/ri''itE
39L,T1,, lit Z '' ►A y 5 III
. a - *
4111 /NW
i .6N494 kf *04 .:a
.E0V; .,,,, A 4 IS :V .
r 3�-, ��`� Sri
,54f07 MI AO*" 1001041
:..3 a 'k
� i a
�a9oz 'W •I
s F ** <,�,m�-Ja---�wwa DmZ s�m<x xo s g � alO n C_
_m
8. ` ;� I t ♦♦♦♦ nrs Fg` m� 2Lr ,- ' 1 Tao .g
x
t9 - ' � .V S �ga io 9"o An bO <SmaSo 8mi — a
_s > ¢ ♦ � �8 cf °m8 <Jn Ol/gOmOy m " X
lir"V 111,474#4 11,
r� { � Rq
- %-k 4141•Aibiii
� q
-y�.Iir ®��°' ��.,� �"T°' �a=_ssEaaaaaa3g 3� 3� 'r gasav� au'a
f. fS - 4� ... 3.3333335551345' 5' 33 �35 y�SFp�
55555 S' S 5' 55'5' STik
tam x=
Vim, �7 4: . nnnnnnnnnn nnn nnnnnn nnnnnn nnnnn _
::'ti
MEGg=ge,PS lit xmtiH',,o w s� ooa - ��
i�ov:o O e
4cm
y' G,..•i 4m �• -� into:: a....,�o-r-.uo�wurovm�ue.1oroo =f
�''- ,120370 Z14, / 04 os00000 00000000000000000ao 00000000
Ya"m�Yo' !� ,, ,,� � 00000000000000 000000000000000g• :
A�oo'"C a zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz= o�oo
o�"—s A •6, .. • m , - • pppff, fr W.f.pppppppppppp 4tW.r 888E
?NW
: eor �♦.,0 '� >♦ K px
gym$ o \ Cr:� '. i4.. 1022 ��1< 1p ..mi aat,n.�,naaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaa44aaaaaaas, u,sr-t SIA 3-� a.a aao.eaa as aa"sas,?..ae.aa°a.aa,a"s.a,aue.Qa,a,a 41
m szn� ,\�_� ,�� � b r,i sssd " .
1Wir 1
W it s# ∎ 41 , C i
, 167' -1011111
�m 1 iv ,,,,,,,,,ak
ii a �0-.--*` / r y o m SSu
W :. ;40-
y, i
031 °/tom i�� � i a
R win um �
o
r.
c z 'nor, I Ir ,, r
y 00 r •a.?1I . W� ,
2 Zen ow mum. -,1 v• D
r. " Z "< -7%1.00 4 tt
rr, z g'
a Al
-� � > sue :
1 jj
ers <� -' $: if' e . rte'
, i t V O
, 111114N'V /) .,-.1 v +AO A ' V. ♦ `A.iii*
fo Nt. NA.i ,,k k., r•
.,, lil '--------------__ tz4 le.
y a4
ac41 co
H 4" _% 1 �/ Q Capt a 6a 6 6 d D6 d D_ l', w C�
z a p
'S c o
o a
Z n
m
Q
An w
m -
m
cn 3
N
c0 w
IP
wall, ,::::
«<
051 pr.,-terotrail,,,,i
..,,,-5, ,---
9S�2b'.� c g ' +,- SS'
a� _3 a s _
7
_ S o ; } ,'= � = �' `1`,,
t
1iJt ,1„,,,„..
IIv,
tilefil
!iv.-;.-'"o-, I 46j 4iNv 10
I
e,„,,,,,j �.-. _� 111 rt ,.,
„,,
;9sa 1!t��`"� NCl/ ,
i �, !I! i!i_If4 ;'I
l .; aIIHI ♦ i k
et lij 4%14 ft \�',,,� (
..41., , ...,•'''' ilk”)
{..tteit4
� `'er
'ghig /_-: r- Alit ,�
R 5;';'a,-. \
pp ,,,, Nip .,-01,, ow ,
. ,
.IV ! s 1101111111143104*0,
may .:: i ,:•
42.'82: x limn. ,
te
f" = -4.44,0 _.,,,
401111111111A
x 'i'O'g 44 A5h �Ilky*■ .,. ,
�? ope .p om 4,41r.4_, w S�s
t. i4 2 id ‘, •Ai y Y a.0 a N
-g4 02° • \ ."...- '
pc-)Z V m 1
Ym �2 tF1_ ..r� /
m ; 1 lit ►
ilL44. , , ''..-11411111 aidg Ill
IA
8 m , t M PI 1
Illei
5 l
7 "'' ip, isa
r
ra 1
n r ��.x 1
T .0 Y J z `°" . ltkolikilloaiii
tto
WWI r' rr5 ,--, r- ola, 40,00„.1A
salillum -... -71*. 11111i ma
. , t-, iiiina,, 40,, ......... _ _„.„,....,,,
rx, ,..., ›
. \ 411 „,--iff.reia 7,1.11
t.o„,.. rrz 0 0 r,_rz-i,
) OP&lm,II1P1 ill Pi 1,111Wall: E
�p �► �►` ;. ��- 111 ns V ,,,.,,.....,,$ 4
ilbi 'li Ille
z 1 , .„,001 1 1 sot% .,..., : /.11' a* A
��1r ��� � sir ilia .
CID �l�.. *„ .- , VAM
rn
n 1111
z 4 A ":841t),`,..41:444 & w6 1, -4,g,
‘64,.. 0
.-• :®' ,� ilk - -0.
— A' s 71 71/11:;(%::\I E 1111.” ;14114
a :‘;, 7.L., 49
? a \ ,,t,yo .e,
\ so'
.., ,,,,,
o
II
.110f4-Ij1ItI!i !g 73 �1 �yj
If'
A
9 av2 ? Ada if'" ,. "_ �i ~ � 1 t'4•1/4
T 3 3.P- 'e 1,(-- ix a.,lit-, -.�Wy�',�l �1I,�/ y ,++ r 4.
Kififli \ .:,, ,b,
s A \
Iv% 10
i,i;,,
Lc*
di,
;Rf
ligIiA 2 N " -4P; i•,- 011°S; ',,,,-(tit '
g rP-..f,"!T \ ':'"i't fOtrorml .01141„, '
'w„dk■jIP■ }11
•-'-13zii. Al&qt.,* 41111,MIA
ID 5,,F.“ siliwilki-- ,,,_.
-1 17''
4 1 cr"'"'",:'„:iSfejlf .14' imps , ,,,,„.,,,,,.,
..
; iimagiammi ...L.1-12:044. l
IIIP NM II 1
IiiT4JI"- m yY m
PJI"' «k.o.. pp
r
mT
r,Icri $t*a
11111 �n l •.g E,0.6,71 41111 '4111111111111L 111W,4 92g
wi
8 ;';',0, 1111•11111111141 WIPA
6 Mr,k W.,tolitftzmire......
� f tom
,, rt. , mom 417: ;
1.11,A1111.11111 III tc(
Z.? si irr•
W m hJ� i ,
ilk
..
swum .� .`�P� �' ,
I
.
X l37m ,A144
ym I r�
m j � ON� 41111111111\ 7 u I sue'
t.-4, ."0:, 4
a 6 4' �,y
A C Z '13 ............,ttl:raiti, - *** ,
fir „-- ,)• n ::='- -''4'4;te .
• n ,__,r > .. 4,9*
1..1.'" ,.<:,,, 0 / "'.***%.'''
.=;`4.4eY' +
r „r^ ti ,....,4*nt -.^�' _ecy '��' Gtys��K� i� a Vo
, O.44111
> '1 r
0,1
,„,..., ,
trg
= .''''''' .r/V 7.',,' 41Paill
,r, Z it
P.3 r4
• `3 / .
CA
1 . i 4 4.....tsf‘o,I I I 14::1,44 oiroll
E rilliii a 1111 a op
, t, s 1
tv
at
a _
Z i''''... — filt:tj Ci. r,,,1<,` lg. -54.111. p, cc:,
vv
�
0
, o
3
o Ik
N
co v
~ O' CI W A O
c — -- —cs . �,_.__,__.,_
0
.❑ `,
i
z —
a F
I- #
d
r
1
�£
1
S
qi ' 4
1
1 r
az
I
.
1
g
4 ' I /../ .
hr
3
I
-I
x
by
1
r +
t
fi j
1
4
t
•5 if . ... `.a'
i Yr r f,.
I p.
4,\. 1�1J*'\\t r . Nl HSIIfiNOiifl `— .
. *tA -.. "- t�l
4
Y�l
M1_.- ^ �`. - •ter ��� rry�,
1 i •�1 \ c, Yw�� ....i �r
41 n o
• .(J
e
rs m x a Pelican Bay Lighting District
� ' ;�W
-n ; . "., Ridgewood Drive&Pelican Bay Boulevard
, Existing MH Fixtures on Existing Poles is
ay.
4.111:917[1.71.,
--,-.,,....- ......',..^.1,9...Lt.], 4`.. ..., ... . 'SC • -.,...•••.,41......C.7...,C=STOV.V.41.7....,1.1731314,,,,,.............1240,IMPC4.[VISIM36.4.36472,ffilSISM,At,62.17,11AW,E.:939,....02,......Sf14..,...... ...................- ,. ...,`.,--....- ...,...- ...,...2.5.29-...SZVRY.........".......
OS.L.:
5 le e 44. as is
r-- ___,
',. : • :
. .
, .
. .
, .
;,,,,, ;,
:, Cl = 2ilr • , i
-------,
":"*.1.7'4• ....,. t ;
..: 1
,.-tt• . ,
:III '-'-'' -=_,,LI,AV . • I
. .
2. ;,.•:•ij"
' .
,se! i .-'44?., •
, r :..• leik, .,,, •
. ,
, .
. ..,.
----- ..,
....
. ' ....---------- '
I ,
I'.;
. i .
../
....t. , ,
-
_.
: a
..."7 t
4 "•4.4.'44-.44-,:.,1t:4":"-':,-.:". ,4: ...4'. I
.......:- .41.4,,,k,,,--4 _
1
,..... ,
i 1
1
I ' ,
I urx. f
n
: i
I , :
i ----, 1
1 '
L
• ... : ,
1
it B r:
..., iti.-•.: • '
. •
t, ti
• 414:
t t ,
,
4 '
'', •-• '',4*i.% -4'''' '
1 4
, .
1/ 4
1 . ,.......'' ...:
I .
4 ,
1 ,
. , .
1 .
I t .
_._
........'
....--": .
.
„.„.
---
C "it -- ---44*-1amklfr1494112-‘ ________...,,-....-...
Ca .
...----
___---
-------------------- -- 4' .. ,
7*- ------,--,---- ------------- C>
rst .
— ------ +-a
...., ---------• c.)
1 / • P
. , _...------t-tt;-------m—r----- l• ....
EY- ,
1 ,.....------------ „
1 i t
••
. .
1 •
. t .
.. t
1
I •
. .
., .:
, . .
, 1 ,
. ,
, ...
, ..., .., _,„...
........ ...........
...., .
.„, „,...
, ...., ,...,
, . „........ ,
.......„ ,
, _...._
.......„, ......._,...
, ...,
, .
, ...,
• ,.... ..,
, .
....._ ,
. CT / --------
il I - kt i
1 1---
1 ----•—•.,_..4}` 1' I. Ps. -., :
(-Dr
, .
, . - 4
t, 'I:, I(t.) 'I''''... 4, • -^,.....,,,........ -----._1:1 a
' CD ,
ca
0 —
Pelican Bay Lighting District
It* °II 2 It; •I‘ ;" Ridgewood Drive&Pelican Bay Boulevard '',..--- j.—$1..o)N)
LED Fixtures on Existng Poles .. , ...
Agenda Item#12b
Page 1 of 13
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Balance Sheet-March 31,2016
Operating Fund 109-FY 2016
(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Investments 2,185,056.86
Interest Receivable -
Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 902,071.58
Due from Property Appraiser -
Due from Tax Collector -
Total Current Assets $ 3,087,128.44
Total Assets $ 3,087,128.44
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Current Liabilities
Accounts/Trade Payable $ 32,196.04
Accrued Wages Payable -
Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 42,492.47
Total Liabilities $ 74,688.51
Fund Balance
Fund Balance-unreserved 598,143.64
Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 2,414,296.29
Total Fund Balance 3,012,439.93
Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 3,087,128.44
Agenda Item#12b
Page 2 of 13
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Income Statement w/Budget-March 31,2016
Operating Fund 109-FY 2016
(Unaudited)
Annual YTD YTD
Budget Budget Actual Variance
Operating Revenues:
Carryforward $ 525,300.00 $ 525,300.00 $ 525,300.00 $ -
Special Assessment-Water Management Admin 881,000.00 801,710.00 805,032.50 3,322.50
Special Assessment-Right of Way Beautification 2,459,700.00 2,238,327.00 2,247,346.17 9,019.17
Plan Review Fees - - - -
Miscellaneous(Surplus Sales,Ins.Refunds) - - 2,500.00 2,500.00
Revenue Reserve(est.5%) (1.67,200.00) - - -
Interest 4,000.00 2,000.00 4,096.77 2,096.77
Total Operating Revenues $ 3,702,800.00 $ 3,567,337.00 $ 3,584,275.44 $ 16,938.44
Operating Expenditures:
Water Management Administration
Payroll Expense $ 75,100.00 $ 37,600.00 $ 45,689.98 $ (8,089.98)
Emergency Maintenace and Repairs 8,800.00 - -
IT Direct Capital 700.00 350.00 350.00 -
IT Office Automation/Billing Hr. 4,100.00 2,050.00 1,950.00 100.00
Indirect Cost Reimbursement 66,500.00 - -
Inter Payment/Mnt.Site Ins. Assessment 14,200.00 7,100.00 7,100.00 -
Other Contractural Services 49,000.00 24,500.00 25,540.60 (1,040.60)
Telephone 5,200.00 2,200.00 1,377.27 822.73
Postage and Freight 1,200.00 200.00 165.00 35.00
Rent Buildings and Equipment 13,500.00 7,900.00 8,573.92 (673.92)
Insurance-General 900.00 500.00 450.00 50.00
Printing,Binding and Copying 1,800.00 200.00 75.00 125.00
Clerk's Recording Fees 1,000.00 500.00 455.00 45.00
Legal Advertising 1,000.00 - - -
Other Office and Operating Supplies 1,500.00 800.00 905.79 (105.79)
Training and Education(Tuition Reimb.) 2,000.00 500.00 302.67 197.33
Total Water Management Admin Operating $ 246,500.00 $ 84,400.00 $ 92,935.23 $ (8,535.23)
Water Management Field Operations
Payroll Expense $ 142,100.00 $ 66,700.00 $ 59,071.79 $ 7,628.21
Engineering Fees 60,000.00 20,000.00 15,042.00 4,958.00
Flood Control Berm and Swale Mntc. 18,000.00 9,000.00 7,940.00 1,060.00
Flood Control Replanting Littorals 8,500.00 1,400.00 750.00 650.00
Flood Control Water Quality Testing Supplies 1,500.00 - 8.43 (8.43)
Interdepartmental Payment(Water Quality Lab) 18,700.00 9,400.00 11,922.23 (2,522.23)
Plan Review Charges 1,500.00 - -
Other Contractural Services 1,000.00 300.00 251.55 48.45
Temporary Labor 70,000.00 35,100.00 32,130.28 2,969.72
Cell Phones 500.00 300.00 782.18 (482.18)
Trash and Garbage 5,300.00 2,300.00 2,273.88 26.12
Motor Pool Rental Charge 200.00 - - -
Insurance-General 2,500.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 -
Insurance-Auto 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 -
Building Repairs&Mntc. 500.00 150.00 122.17 27.83
Fleet Maintenance and Parts 18,000.00 7,500.00 5,379.93 2,120.07
Fuel and Lubricants 2,400.00 1,000.00 605.62 394.38
Tree Triming 100,000.00 40,000.00 37,680.00 2,320.00
Clothing and Uniforms 1,100.00 850.00 800.14 49.86
Page 1 of 3
Agenda Item#12b
Page 3 of 13
Personal Safety Equipment 800.00 200.00 63.77 136.23
Fertilizer and Herbicides 100,600.00 49,500.00 49,403.81 96.19
Other Repairs and Maintenance 1,500.00 400.00 12.50 387.50
Other Operating Supplies and Equipment 2,500.00 1,300.00 1,208.37 91.63
Total Water Management Field Operating $ 558,200.00 $ 247,150.00 $ 227,198.65 $ 19,951.35
Right of Way Beautification-Administration
Payroll Expense $ 77,100.00 $ 37,400.00 $ 26,561.85 $ 10,838.15
Emergency Repairs and Maintenance 7,400.00 - - -
IT Capital 300.00 150.00 150.00 -
Office Automation 8,100.00 4,050.00 4,050.00 -
Other Contractural Services 49,900.00 25,000.00 24,138.60 861.40
Telephone 5,200.00 2,600.00 1,383.28 1,216.72
Postage 2,000.00 300.00 170.00 130.00
Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 14,700.00 8,600.00 9,071.52 (471.52)
Insurance-General 500.00 250.00 250.00 -
Printing,Binding and Copying 2,300.00 200.00 100.00 100.00
Clerk's Recording 1,200.00 600.00 456.00 144.00
Legal Advertising 1,200.00 - - -
Office Supplies General 2,000.00 1,000.00 633.52 366.48
Training and Education(Tuition Reimb.) 2,200.00 1,100.00 796.00 304.00
Total Right of Way Beautification Admin Operating $ 174,100.00 $ 81,250.00 $ 67,760.77 $ 13,489.23
Right of Way Beautification-Field Operations
Payroll Expense $ 1,005,800.00 $ 474,500.00 $ 466,578.74 $ 7,921.26
Emergency Maintenance and Repairs 3,300.00 - - -
Recycled Water Use 89,900.00 49,600.00 56,294.47 (6,694.47)
Pest Control 1,000.00 - - -
Landscape Incidentals 2,500.00 1,300.00 515.71 784.29
Other Contractural Services 51,900.00 22,500.00 18,782.60 3,717.40
Temporary Labor 367,000.00 172,500.00 170,472.26 2,027.74
Cellular Telephone 3,800.00 1,600.00 1,284.10 315.90
Electricity 3,000.00 1,500.00 1,122.96 - 377.04
Trash and Garbage 15,900.00 8,500.00 8,988.98 (488.98)
Rent Equipment 5,000.00 1,000.00 584.52 415.48
Motor Pool Rental Charge 100.00 - - -
Insurance-General 8,600.00 4,300.00 4,300.00 -
Insurance-Auto 10,200.00 5,100.00 5,100.00 -
Auto Insurance Claim Paid - - 450.80 (450.80)
Building Repairs and Maintenance 500.00 100.00 52.68 47.32
Fleet Maintenance and Parts 45,300.00 18,900.00 18,093.33 806.67
Fuel and Lubricants 48,300.00 14,100.00 10,266.52 3,833.48
Licenses,Permits,Training 500.00 500.00 2,275.53 (1,775.53)
Tree Triming 102,700.00 101,700.00 101,100.00 600.00
Clothing and Uniforms 9,500.00 3,800.00 3,189.83 610.17
Personal Safety Equipment 3,500.00 1,800.00 1,969.17 (169.17)
Fertilizer and Herbicides 62,000.00 33,600.00 30,866.07 2,733.93
Landscape Maintenance/Mulch 51,500.00 34,300.00 34,590.70 (290.70)
landscape Materials 52,000.00 49,400.00 50,876.80 (1,476.80)
Road/Pathway Repairs(Sharrows) 2,000.00 2,000.00 5,354.20 (3,354.20)
Sprinkler Maintenance 30,000.00 11,300.00 7,129.69 4,170.31
Painting Supplies 500.00 100.00 - 100.00
Traffic Signs 3,000.00 800.00 325.00 475.00
Minor Operating Equipment 3,700.00 2,200.00 3,741.05 (1,541.05)
Other Operating Supplies 9,000.00 5,300.00 6,374.56 (1,074.56)
Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Operating $ 1,992,000.00 $ 1,022,300.00 $ 1,010,680.27 $ 11,619.73
Total Operating Expenditures $ 2,970,800.00 $ 1,435,100.00 $ 1,398,574.92 $ 36,525.08
Page 2 of 3
Agenda Item#12b
Page 4 of 13
Capital Expenditures:
Water Management Field Operations
Other Machinery and Equipment $ 54,000.00 $ 48,600.00 $ 47,524.41 $ 1,075.59
General - $ - - -
Total Water Management Field Operations Capital $ 54,000.00 $ 48,600.00 $ 47,524.41 $ 1,075.59
Right of Way Beautification-Field
Autos and Trucks $ 116,700.00 105,030.00 $ 104,065.20 $ 964.80
Other Machinery and Equipment 57,700.00 49,045.00 48,759.86 — 285.14
Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Capital $ 174,400.00 $ 154,075.00 $ 152,825.06 $ 1,249.94
Total Capital Expenditures $ 228,400.00 $ 202,675.00 $ 200,349.47 $ 2,325.53
Total Operating Expenditures $ 3,199,200.00 $ 1,637,775.00 $ 1,598,924.39 $ 38,850.61
Non-Operating Expenditures:
Transfer to Fund 322 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Tax Collector Fees 86,000.00 68,800.00 61,044.56 7,755.44
Property Appraiser Fees 55,000.00 46,750.00 45,091.99 1,658.01
Reserves(2 1/2 months for Contingencies) 182,700.00 - - -
Reserves for Capital 200,000.00 - .. -
Reserved for Attrition (20,100.00) -
Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 503,600.00 $ 115,550.00 $ 106,136.55 $ 9,413.45
Total Expenditures $ 3,702,800.00 $ 1,753,325.00 $ 1,705,060.94 $ 48,264.06
Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 1,814,012.00 $ 1,879,214.50 $ 65,202.50
Page 3 of 3
Agenda Item#12b
Page 5 of 13
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Balance Sheet-March 31,2016
Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2016
(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Investments $ 1,327,702.04
Interest Receivable -
Improvements,Vehicles&Equipment 28,138.77
Due from Tax Collector -
Total Current Assets $ 1,355,840.81
Total Assets $ 1,355,840.81
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Current Liabilities
Accounts/Trade Payable $ 2,121.60
Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 6,444.74
Accrued Wages Payable -
Total Liabilities $ 8,566.34
Fund Balance
Fund Balance-unreserved 1,010,189.91
Excess Revenue(Expenditures) 337,084.56
Total Fund Balance 1,347,274.47
Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 1,355,840.81
Agenda Item#12b
Page 6 of 13
Pelican l3ay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Income Statement w/Budget-March 31, 2016
Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2016
(Unaudited)
Annual YTD YTD
Budget Budget Actual Variance
Operating Revenues:
Carryforward $ 916,000.00 $ 916,000.00 $ 916,000.00 $ -
Curent Ad Valorem Tax 495,900.00 446,310.00 450,769.33 $ 4,459.33
Transfer from Tax Collector - - 14.44 $ 14.44
Miscellaneous(i.e. Ins. Refunds, surplus, eta - - 6,338.47 $ 6,338.47
Revenue Reserve(est.5%) $ (25,000.00) - - $ -
Interest 2,500.00 1,250.00 3,636.16 $ 2,386.16
Total Operating Revenues 1,389,400.00 1,363,560.00 1,376,758.40 13,198.40
Operating Expenditures:
Street Lighting Administration
Payroll Expense $ 74,600.00 $ 29,100.00 $ 22,661.42 $ 6,438.58
Indirect Cost& IT Automation 3,800.00 $ 300.00 300.00 $ -
Other Contractural Services 31,200.00 $ 15,600.00 16,981.60 $ (1,381.60)
Telephone 5,200.00 $ 2,600.00 1,008.89 $ 1,591.11
Postage and Freight 1,500.00 $ 400.00 265.00 $ 135.00
Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 14,300.00 $ 8,300.00 8,855.47 $ (555.47)
Insurance-General 400.00 $ 2.00.00 2.00.00 $ -
Printing, Binding and Copying - $ - - $ -
Office Supplies General 800.00 $ 400.00 197.36 $ 202.64
Tuition Reimbursement - $ - - $ -
Other Operating Supplies 1,000.00 $ 300.00 - $ 300.00
Total Street Lighting Admin Operating 132,800.00 57,200.00 50,469.74 6,730.26
Street Lighting Field Operations
Payroll Expense 67,200.00 26,800.00 24,518.76 2,281.24
Enginnering Fees 25,000.00 12,500.00 10,970.50 1,529.50
Emergency Maintenance& Repairs 9,600.00 9,600.00 11,180.65 (1,580.65)
Other Contractual Services 800.00 300.00 251.55 48.45
Temporary Labor 37,400.00 18,700.00 17,244.18 1,455.82
Cellular Telephone 1,000.00 500.00 782.18 (282.18)
Electricity 35,000.00 17,500.00 14,686.76 2,813.24
Insurance-General 800.00 400.00 400.00 -
Insurance-Auto 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 -
Building Maintenace& Repairs 500.00 100.00 30.74 69.26
Fleet Maintenance and Parts 1,800.00 600.00 208.35 391.65
Page 1 of 2
Agenda Item#12b
Page 7 of 13
Fuel and Lubricants 800.00 300.00 261.48 38.52
Other Equipment Repairs/Supplies - - - -
Personal Safety Equipment 800.00 400.00 479.02 (79.02)
Electrical Contractors 16,400.00 8,200.00 - 8,200.00
Light Bulb Ballast 16,800.00 7,400.00 7,386.75 13.25
Total Street Lighting Field Operating 214,900.00 103,800.00 88,900.92 14,899.08
Total Street Lighting Expenditures 347,700.00 161,000.00 139,370.66 21,629.34
Capital Expenditures:
Street Lighting Field Operations
Other Machinery/Equipment - - - -
General lmprovements* - - 9,650.00 (9,650.00)
Total Capital Expenditures - - 9,650.00 (9,650.00)
Total Operating Expenditures 347,700.00 161,000.00 149,020.66 11,979.34
Non-Operating Expenditures:
Tax Collector Fees 14,000.00 9,800.00 9,057.95 742.05
Property Appraiser Fees 8,900.00 - - -
Reserve for Future Construction 712,900.00 - -
Reserves(2 1/2 mos.for Contingencies) 100,000.00 - - -
Reserves for Capital 205,900.00 - - -
Total Non-Operating Expenditures 1,041,700.00 9,800.00 9,057.95 742.05
Total Expenditures 1,389,400.00 170,800.00 158,078.61 12,721.39
Net Profit/(Loss) -
1,192,760.00 1,218,679.79 25 919.79
*Bollards replaced on Ridgewood
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item#12b
Page 8 of 13
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Balance Sheet-March 31,2016
Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2016
(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Investments $ 148,474,45
interest Receivable -
Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 247,870.29
Due from Tax Collector -
Total Current Assets 396,344.74
Total Assets $ 396,344.74
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Current Liabilities
Accounts/Trade Payable $ 5,880.00
Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd -
Accrued Wages Payable -
Total Liabilities 5,880.00
Fund Balance
Fund Balance-unreserved 79,864.28
Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 310,600.46
Total Fund Balance 390,464.74
Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 396,344.74
Agenda Item#12b
Page 9 of 13
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Income Statement w/Budget-March 31,2016
Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2016
(Unaudited)
Annual YTD YTD
Budget Budget Actual Variance
Operating Revenues:
Carry Forward $ 80,003.75 $ 80,003.75 $ 80,003.75 $ -
Special Assessment 133,500.00 121,485.00 122,135.51 650.51
Transfer from Tax Collector - - -
Fund 111 - - - -
Revenue Reserve (est. 5%) (6,700.00) - - -
Interest 500.00 300.00 432.15 132.15
Total Operating Revenues $ 207,303.75 $ 201,788.75 $ 202,571.41 $ 782.66
Operating Expenditures:
Clam Bay Restoration
Engineering Fees $ 56,091.10 $ 30,850.11 $ 28,166.92 $ 2,683.19
Other Contractural Services 18,934.27 $ 12,307.28 11,505.00 802.28
Tree Trimming 60,424.00 30,212.00 30,074.00 138.00
Other Equipment Repairs 1,077.77 - - -
Aerial Photography 24,788.60 - - -
Minor Operating 9,188.01 - - -
Other Operating Supplies 2,000.00 - - -
Total Clam Bay Restoration $ 172,503.75 73,369.38 $ 69,745.92 $ 3,623.46
Clam Bay Ecosystem
Engineering Fees $ - - $ - $ -
Licenses and Permits - - - -
Other Contractual Services - - - -
Total Clam Bay Ecosystem $ - $ - $ - $ -
Capital Expenditures:
Clam Bay Restoration
Other Machinery and Equipment $ 11,000.00 $ - $ - $ -
Total Capital Expenditures $ 11,000.00 $__.. $ - $ -
Total Clam Bay Operating Expenditures $ 183,503.75 $ 73,369.38 $ 69,745.92 $ 3,623.46
Page 1 of 2
Agenda Item#12b
Page 10 of 13
Non-Operating Expenditures:
Tax Collector Fees $ 3,600.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 2,442.63 $ 257.37
Property Appraiser Fees 2,700.00 1,890.00 1,681.79 208.21
Reserves for Contingencies 17,500.00 - -
Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 23,800.00 $ 4,590.00 $ 4,124.42 $ 465.58
Total Expenditures $ 207,303.75 $ 77,959.38 $ 73,870.34 $ 4,089.04
Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 123,829.37 $ 128,701.07 $ 4,871.70
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item#12b
Page 11 of 13
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Balance Sheet-March 31,2016
Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2016
(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Investments $ 1,592,968.13
Interest Receivable -
Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 2,282,627.55
Due from Tax Collector -
Total Current Assets 3,875,595.68
Total Assets $ 3,875,595.68
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Current Liabilities
Accounts/Trade Payable $ -
Goods Received Inv. Received -
Total Liabilities -
Fund Balance
Fund Balance-unreserved 1,145,309.57
Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 2,730,286.11
Total Fund Balance 3,875,595.68
Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 3,875,595.68
Agenda Item#12b
Page 12 of 13
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Income Statement w/Budget-March 31, 2016
Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2016
(Unaudited)
Annual Amended YTD YTD
Budget Budget Actual Variance
Operating Revenues:
Carry Forward $ 1,361,477.09 $ 1,361,477.09 $ 1,361,477.09 $ -
Transfer from Fund 109 General - - - -
Miscellaneous - - - -
Special Assessment 400,700.00 364,637.00 365,698.47 1,061.47
Transfer from Tax Collector - - - -
Revenue Reserve (est. 5%) (20,300.00) - -
Interest 5,000.00 2,500.00 4,745.41 2,245.41
Total Operating Revenues $ 1,746,877.09 $ 1,728,614.09 $1,731,920.97 $ 3,306.88
Operating Expenditures:
Irrigation& Landscaping
Hardscape Project(50066)
Engineering Fees $ 56,063.32 $ 5,606.33 $ 5,381.50 $ 224.83
Other Contractural Services 611,987.00 - - -
Rent Equipment 635.50 - -
Sprinkler System Repairs 3,650.52 - - -
Landscape Materials 88,206.75 - - -
Permits - - - -
Signs& Posts(Share the Road) - - - -
Electrical - - - -
Other Operating Supplies 3,489.25 - - -
Traffic Sign Restoration Project(50103)
Traffic Signs 68,834.00 - - -
Lake Aeration (50108)
Improvements 100,020.77 - - -
North Berm Restoration (50107)
Other Contractural Services 25,400.13 - - -
Beach Renourishment(50126)
Other Contractural Services 400,000.00 - - -
Lake Bank Project(51026)
Swale &Slope Maintenance 40,842.75 12,252.83 8,809.20 3,443.63
Engineering Fees 110,500.00 16,575.00 - 16,575.00
Landscape Materials 2,940.86 - - -
Other Contractural Services 106,306.24 106,306.24 124,990.00 (18,683.76)
Upgrade Irrigation System (51145)
Page 1 of 2
Agenda Item#12b
Page 13 of 13
Improvements 116,000.00 - - -
Total Irrigation& Landscaping Expenditures $ 1,734,877.09 $ 140,740.40 $ 139,180.70 $ 1,559.70
Non-Operating Expenditures:
Tax Collector Fees $ 8,000.00 $ 7,360.00 $ 7,313.74 $ 46.26
Property Appraiser Fees 4,000.00 4,000.00 5,040.49 (1,040.49)
Revenue for Contingencies - - -
Total Non-Operating Expenditures: $ 12,000.00 $ 11,360.00 $ 12,354.23 $ (994.23)
Total Expenditures $ 1,746,877.09 $ 152,100.40 $ 151,534.93 $ 565.47
Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 1,576,513.69 $ 1,580,386.04 $ 3,872.35
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item#13b
Page 1 of 2
Clam Bay Update
USACE permit. It is great news that the permit has been issued and that Clam Pass
will be dredged in April. Getting this permit has been a top priority of PBSD for over
three years. This is the first time in about seven years that the County has had both
the FDEP and USACE dredging permits for Clam Pass so the Pass can be dredged
when conditions warrant dredging,as outlined in the Clam Bay NRPA Management
Plan. Thanks to all who made this happen.
Copper. Results are attached. Stations 1, 2,and 3 show higher levels of copper.
Mangrove stress. Bay Colony will continue to share its monthly photos of stressed
mangroves. After Clam Pass is dredged,the improved tidal exchange in Upper Clam
Bay may improve the condition of the mangroves. If not,other avenues will be
explored,including assessing the condition and number of hand-dug channels and
the effectiveness of drainage in basins 5 and 6.
Osprey platform. Staff indicated that it would discuss with PBF reps the possibility
of erecting a nesting platform on PBF property.
Water quality monitoring. Information about this monitoring,including the scope
of work,has not been shared with committee members to date.
Prepared by Susan O'Brien
March 31, 2016
Agenda Item#13b
Page 2 of 2
Clam Bay Copper
Clam Clam Clam
Clam Clam Clam Clam Clam Clam
Bay 1 Bay 2 Bay 3
Bay Bay Bay 6 Bay? Bay8 Bay9
3/2/15 1.54 20.10 1.12 0.50 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
3/26/15 4.97 3.93 4.68 3.50 3.00 3.58 3.00 3.00 3.00
4/29/15 4.70 4.49 3.39 0.65 4.73 1.71 0.94 1.69 1.51
5/26/15 4.49 2.66 1,24 1.37 0.27 0.27 0.35 0.36 1.91
6/30/15 3.04 2.16 0.47 3.08 0.27 041...021547 2.04 0.27 0.27
7/16/15 4.91 11.20 4°1..841957
.15 2.66 1.58 7.12 3.28 1.53
8/26/15 0.88 1.46 1.89 1.43 2.10 4.36 3.68 3.61
9/16/15 2.77 11.60 3.10 2.19 0.54 0.50 0.90 0.27 0.39
10/21/15 1.85 1.30 0.835 1.76 0.272 1.206 3.36 0.551 0.547
11/17/15 2.39 2.21 2.16 1.75 1.09 0.864 1.37 0.910 0.684
12/09/15 2.037 4.306 2.631 0.272 0.272 0.538 0.901 1.415 0.272
1/13/16 3.89 8.91 4.29 2.15 1.44 1.17 0.854 0.558 0.510
2/25/16 3.46 9.48 1.70 2.14 0.272 0.272 0.411 0.278 0.272
`- ' Clam ay ate°Quality
, Y ' Sampling Locations. mo "' _y
Clam Bay 1 `f , Legend rt
f Clam Bay Water Quality Stations
Clam Bay 21: r 8 r •, �."`'
Y _ "F' t F4W-?"gg T t 1 1.-1 .1174 , ,per tYi.yC
AVM 1� j1 'w n yp-"' `.4 ,rt 5,, { {
.4,eC It l':! itit ' -A1
,--:4--
�� �- F r,. d.,. ,r yy ,� . a -
Clam Bay 3 PJ -.'• L '`;y ,,t., • .�''r ice,
`,-.3..,, ,: :'.,,,,pi,\.i $1 i ors, rZ
"G%-.4:41.5.k...?:ti. "S 1,- - 3
Clam Ba 4 t S s � d - K d�� Y
•t" r I
Clam Bay SamplingLocatlons2009 C �1 � v 1 F�
Station tat tong j� tf ',.,¢k"' 6y 'r ;* i ±
ClamBayl8149.0082614.618 �',. `rr f% ..\ , r. F rt
Clam Bay 2 814$.9862614.277 "k':474:,,,, Clam Bay 5,; .:2,2-4.'� 7+ rxe Y
Clam Bay3 8148.9652613.869 ' , r xe/t; `' ` 41
Ciam Bay 4 814%03426 13.636 x. . t_` ', ;
Clam Bays 81 48.824 26 13.010 clam Bay 6 .1e.-7-2......i..41:f`." 11`"'•'" '°f , c �,•
Clam Bay 6 81 48.868 2612.800 - Y 6•t . "
Ciam:ay7 8148.9332612.682 � � t'3�5'., er g
Clam Bay 8 8148.7662612.659 ,: Clam Bay 8 ` f ' `f^ st,;x f rt
Y r��'t'_n-_t F.4.-. -1_.,-.!'s;,..
Clam Bay S 81 .586 2 12.651 ., ^ ,s i• Clam Bay 9 ,�
Chan Bap 7 " +.
Agenda Item#13c
Page 1 of 1
LANDSCAPE & SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING REPORT
for the PBSD BOARD MEETING 4/6/16
The Landscape & Safety Committee met on March 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM
in the Pelican Bay Community Center. The following items were
discussed:
1. Marion Bolick, PBSD Operations Manager, outlined ongoing FY2016
projects and activities. He also delineated FY 2017 needs projections
that will be discussed further at the upcoming Budget Committee
meeting.
2. Neil Dorrill, PBSD Administrator, introduced the notion of performing
a sidewalk lighting evaluation in addition to or as part of the street
current street light engineering study.
3. There was a committee discussion, that included Cpl. Neal Bohannon of
the CCSO, on bicycle traffic law compliance.
4. Susan O'Brien, PBSD Chairwoman, will respond to a resident's
complaint about the difficulty seeing the Crayton Rd. street signs.
The consensus of the committee was that no further signage was
indicated.
i
5. The committee discussed the Pebble Creek/North Tram Station cross
walk once again. The line of sight issues will be addressed by the PBSD
and monitored. No other viable changes to make the cross-walk safer
are possible.
6. Discussion on placing "allow 3 feet when passing a bicycle" safety signs
resulted in the committee not wanting to proceed at this time.
Lisa Jacob, PBSD Assistant Project Manager, presented the legal and
traffic sign requirements to the committee.
Submitted By: Joe Chicurel, Chairman PBSD Landscape&Safety Cte.
lighting Energy Solution
WE TAKE THE ill OUT OF ill UMINATION®
Project Name: Pelican Bay LED Retrofit Date: 04/04/16
Project Address: 0
City: 0 State: FL I Zip Code: 0
Contact Name: 0 Phone: 0 I Fax: 0
Blended kWh rate: $0.110 Cooling season in weeks 0.0 Square Footage: o
System Annual kWh Annual HVAC Total annual Annual lighting Lighting system Estimated annual Estimated Estimated percentage of
Annual kWh used saved by using kWh used to kWh used for kWh cost per average lamp life amortized lighting annual lighting annual lighting kWh
summary for lighting controls cool lighting lighting system blended rate in years maintenance cost operating cost reduced
Existing Lighting I 466,483 I 0 0 466,483 $51,313.15 3.4 $7,679.02 I $58,992.16 I N/A
LED Upgrade I 335,438 I 0 0 I 335,438 $36,898.17 I 22.8 I $0.00 I $36,898.17 I -28.1%
Total annual kWh used for lighting Annual lighting kWh cost per blended rate Estimated annual lighting operating cost
system
V~.. $60.000.00 / /� ...
600,000 550,000 00 $60,000.00 "r
$40,00000 pp ,.�'��
400.000 $30,00000 t'r, W r $40,000.00
200,000 �f $20,000.00 t9i"J $20,000.00 ...
�,
0 7 $10,0$0.00 T r y= �"
....._.,...._..,,,—.�„... 50.00 j i
$0.00 %�
•Existing Lighting •LED Upgrade •Existing Lighting LED Upgrade
■Existing Lighting ■LED Upgrade
Overall Cost per 1000
System efficiency Overall system Overall system delivered mean delivered
mean lumens efficiency rating lumens lumens
Existing Lighting 1 6,283,800 67.50% 4,451,346 I $11.53 7
LED Upgrade I 7,982,175 I 95.00% I 7,583,066 I $4.87
Overall delivered mean lumens Cost per 1000 delivered lumens
Overall system effic' ing 8,000,000
100.00% , r°W.. .. .. .,.: 6,000,000 .. _. $15.00 r---':
...............
,{/
4000000 $10.00 /
50.00% ,'I/ -- . z /'
'/ 2,000,000 /'" $5.00 j / '
0.00% ........„..d,.-.� 0 $0.00--f ! .... .
a.. ......... _.......,.
•Existing Lighting •LED Upgrade •Existing Lighting as LED Upgrade ■Existing Lighting ■LED Upgrade
Executive Additional EsUmatedannual Realized Realized(ROI) Total increase in net
Bugdget labor EPACT Tax State or local investment savingzcomparedto payback in return on income after
summary Material cost cost dedcution utility rebate cost* Existing Lighting years nvestment 22 years
Existing Lighting $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A
LED Upgrade $741,507.00 $60,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $801,507.00 $22,093.99 36.3 3% -$315,439.21
For each month that goes by with NOTHING done....the below loss in net income is the reality
The cost of
Months of waiting
Waiting 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6
LED Upgrade $1,841.17 $3,682.33 $5,523.50 $7,364.66 $9,205.83 $11,047.00
Percentage of project investment 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1%
This analysis was prepared b:
SESCO Lighting 5
a . Mike Siner
A Proud MYt of US. Energy Division Manager Lighting For A
,1,,:"sr-P.. Green Butffdrtg Counciil. y
(386)366-1002 Greener Tomorrow a
msiner@sescolighting.com
*The(Additional investment cost)is calculated by subtracting the first line under the(Executive summary)from each corresponding line below it
**Total increase in net income is calculated by taking the Annual savings(X)Years(-)Investment cost(o)increase of net income
The energy reduction and cost savings in this analysis is estimated and is based on the information presented in this document,actual results may vary.
N
>O O O m
ra
w O O 2
V' o a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o o
0 « E m0, 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c ^N N VT IA N N VT N VT VT VT N VT VT V,VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT V?u1 VT VT
O E VT vT
a)
00 w
m
0 = o a v
n v rri ri
E
—
0 y
-O _J 00 0
n
0 0
E ti ti
0
0 0
C 0 O 0
t/1 1.
0
<
m x
-O m U 00
O W n 0 O CO
U .A C o
Q y
Y
N
- 0
E vt
00000000000000000000000000000
J V 0
~ o C N to
E
°,
00 X
88 W >C
w E m N
^ V)
O J ° E
W 2 OF x
n o
O " =
R 0 3 o ° o m
C,/^1 .0 q . 4 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
(1) Z a CA H- 1 ° v °o
C_ CO N y
}1 ' V
�Q 3 00 0 \ 0 m
L z m o 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 . 00000000000000
~O 0 3 >
^, J = W e y W O n
VJ 0 Op o a Yk
C 0 O C
1 c _
� 0 0 Q Q W OL.L vf C
X ¢ r o a s °
n
F `
m
W o E a _ m N
2 ; "
F-
to Y m E
Mr Q m o 0 00
W 3 v o
S.'
Co y_ u
n O_ 0
_ _ - al
xx
0 H p O
o Cl-0 w 1,t
N s 0
C' 0 c bp
W - E E O U
J x U v v N
LL aJ
Lo T Q) n n C 0 -0
CO
C
U o m m ^
> o a
W o w
a Z Z >•
w � O L-1.-~ Q
,
\
cu C N � v \ 0 0 > Yk
Z
03 L V a1 ..z.. a Z Z Q C1
n Z au Crl •
y Q U 3 W
o v 00 O Q
a
o 'o o =
d U c U
0 , Q a
0 _C .. F
C OD O o
O J- V -
0 N co L 0
O
0 01. C2' Q r z m
E m )- O
r zzl,,2 013 C
51 '51
F ;j
t.7
m
v
o a
to
00000000000000 . 00000000000000o
a
V' o - 000000000000000000000000000000
C)
C)
y c_
v
co co
O. v N
E ] oc N
—
C1 v o o
0, -' O O
-• fl'
C O O
E O O
• , ,
co
O O
' O O O
U V?VT
C X O o
a m u '-O LL a o o co
0
a_ -0 .1,-, c
cs o
N N '4 o O
u
°JV 0.! O O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 o
00 C O
' m ro
0 E 2
Ln in.
v 'E'›- o o -i y
O O >
LL • N Q
w
0 J E
2 ? m o
A+ o O o4 e-I
M O °
0 �, N
( .• � " . 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O i--�
V JI B e0 0 l0 00
z a � ' - a oo
o 4) CO N N
.ti u
Q t0 8 v m \ O N
L Z i- 00 a? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o o co 3 >
y O a) 2 a , __ aQ_ , i Q C0 c =
CI j 0 0 o a IA w
rn NO
o
0 a
W o v z �• o co 0
= 0 3 w
0 Y . 0.
vl
N m c
W 3 v v o
a
c.
N U
a 0
« O C yam, N
E -I N D
C X
-I 4J no
0 H
F O
v =2 ,-, 0 v U
J o d 4:t 0 . . a w
' 0 0 C L O
ct 0 N J J J O
D d O O O U
T w v N (1.1 N N
CO a a
07
C
CO
O o m o Is■
' ° N N CO
crw a _
az° z° > ct
w o 1-
0
C �>
ci • �. Gl v u cu N > Yt
00 a V 16 H a Z Z 0 O
z N Ol
d Q a W ti
E 0 Q
a r
0o _
n. 0 -o c Q
a
c . F-
s
t� bp ao 0
0 J 0 .0
C N C -0
O
LE_ Q L L N 2 i m
.0.a
1 0
-.J Ql
C7
lightinnnergy Solution
WE TAKE THE in OUT OF ill UMINATION°
Project Name:I Pelican Bay LED Retrofit I
Net Preset Value (NPV) / Internal Rate of Return (IRR) / Internal Pay Back Period
Annual inflation rate I 1.6%
Existing Lighting NPV Year
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Energy Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 _ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Maintenance Cost ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02)
Initial Investment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 I $0.00 I $0.00 I $0.00 I $0.00 $0.00 I $0.00 I $0.00 I $0.00 I $0.00
Total cash flow $0.00 $0.00 ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02) ($7,679.02)
Existing Lighting
Net Preset Value(NPV)I $0.00
Incremental difference over Existing Lighting I
�:�' 15 ` �; Year
„� a,�.,�.,,,. ,rte.,
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Energy Savings $132,236.02 $14,414.97 $14,414.97 $14,414.97 $14,414.97 $14,414.97 $14,414.97 $14,414.97 $14,414.97 $14,414.97 $14,414.97
Maintenance Savings $70,443.59 $7,679.02 $7,679.02 $7,679.02 $7,679.02 $7,679.02 $7,679.02 $7,679.02 $7,679.02 $7,679.02 $7,679.02
Incremental difference ($801,507.00) ($801,507.00) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total cash flow -$598,827.39 ($801,507.00) $22,093.99 $22,093.99 $22,093.99 $22,093.99 $22,093.99 $22,093.99 $22,093.99 $22,093.99 $22,093.99 $22,093.99
Net Preset Value(NPV) ($598,827.39)
Internal Rate of Return(IRR) -18.5%
Internal Pay Back Period(Yrs) 36.3
Net Present Value(NPV)Definition Internal Rate of Return(IRR)Definition
Net present value(NPV)is an investment measure that tells an investor whether the investment is achieving a Internal rate of return(IRR)for an investment is the percentage rate earned on each dollar
target yield at a given initial investment.NPV also quantifies the adjustment to the initial investment needed to invested for each period it is invested.IRR is also another term people use for interest.ultimately,
achieve the target yield assuming everything else remains the same.Formally,the net present value is simply IRR gives an investor the means to compare alternative investments based on their yield.
the summation of cash flows(C)for each period(n)in the holding period(N),discounted at the investor's Mathematically,the IRR can be found by setting the above NPV equation equal to zero(0)and
required rate of return(r): solving for the rate of return(IRR).
x C ii CF,
NPV=�(1+r)n 0 X11 + IRRI`
_ Caw fighting Energy Solution
WE TAKE THE it/OUT OF ill UMINATION°
Project Name: Pelican Bay LED Retrofit Date: 04/04/16
Project Address: 0
City: 0 State: FL I Zip Code: 0
Contact Name: 0 Phone: 0 I Fax 0
I Environmental impact
Annual lbs of carbon emissions produced
:,
Existing Lighting 625,087 1
C(111.02 LED Upgrade 449,487 'f x
xy
Carbon emissions in lbs saved from our
"'4 '._ - environment by using more efficient lighting
VI
kil
LED upgrade 175,601
The energy savings from this proposal will
�� reduce the barrels of oil listed below annually
from being wasted to produce energy for this
facility
LED Upgrade 186
t t /.'„ `I - z �l
�, + The reduction of carbon emissions is equal to
4
removing the quantity of cars listed below from
our highways annually
LED Upgrade 15 �
Environmental Mission Statement
As the leading manufacturers'representative in the lighting industry,we will work diligently to arouse,motivate
and educate as many people as possible-within our company and outside-inviting all to join us in a meaningful
and significant effort to renew our environment and sustain our planet.®
°�,4f'
GREEN IS NOT A SALES CONCEPT FOR SESCO, BUT A SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY WE EMBRACE.®
SE i
Lighting For A
Greener Tomorrow®
I was asked at the March Board meeting to outline the type of information that could
be included in update reports that PBSD's administrator could be asked to provide,
per the Administrator's current contract.
• Real time updates regarding major events,such as the issuance of the ACOE
ten-year dredging permit,opening of bids,and preconstruction meeting.The
permit was issued on March 9,and PBSD Board members learned about it
from Linda Roth's email on March 11. Bids were opened on March 23,and
only those Board members who attended the Landscape and Safety
Committee meeting on March 28 received an update on the bid opening. To
date PBSD Board members have received no update on the pre-construction
meeting held on March 30. All Board members know about the start date
and dredging plans is the information in the PBF's regular weekly email blast
on March 30.
• Regular updates,perhaps on or about the 15th of the month,including
information on selected topics,such as those listed below.
Status of major projects,such as the following:
swale work near Oak Lake Sanctuary. Spending up to$55,000 of
capital funds was approved in June 2015 and to date this project has
not been completed.
replacements signs. $68,000 is in the FY16 capital fund
budget. Some of the signs discussed at the January Board
meeting were installed several weeks ago. An update could include
information about the expected completion date for the rest of the
signs in phase 1 and a list of the signs scheduled for the second and
third phases of the project in FY16.
research re: South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD)
permits to identify work that PBSD is required to perform and to
determine the steps involved in obtaining maintenance easements for
the 19 privately owned ponds. This information was requested at
the September PBSD Board meeting.
new irrigation equipment purchase and installation. $140,000 is in
the FY16 budget. This topic was last discussed at the PBSD Board
workshop in November.
expected date for the completion of work at the pathway along
Oakmont Lake by resolving whether PBSD or PBF will address unsafe
drop-off areas.
Over
list of the ponds in which aeration equipment will be
installed and the expected timeline for same. $100,000 is in
FY16 budget.
list of the littoral plants to be planted at ponds that PBSD
maintains,the maintenance requirements of these plants,and the
expected timeline for same. $35,000 is in FY16 budget.
list of recommended lake bank erosion work for FY16.
information about a$20,000 project to assess functionality of a swale
in drainage basin 6.
list of pathway repairs that the County will be asked to address in
FY16.
Follow-up from Board meetings,such as the following:
process for notifying board members of pre-application meetings for
site development or improvement plans that impact areas of PBSD
responsibility. Since the Board approved requesting that PBSD be
placed on the County's notification list in November,staff has not
notified Board members of any pre-application meetings.
scope of work for Clam Bay water quality monitoring.Board
members were told at the March meeting that this information
would be distributed.
Follow-up from committee meetings,such as the following:
expected effective date for using an off-site location for car carrier
activity in Pelican Bay.
whether PBF approval and support for another osprey nesting
platform has been secured.
update on status of major streetlight electrical repairs.
Prepared by Susan O'Brien
April 2016
I
_
Futures /
� i b
J ✓
•
NY, .
-1,1;1 Cyanobacteria
r'f.+0*•, . . •. '.• clogs Lake Erie,
•
� ;
� • -w
•,�' _ hich is about 92
°y f ... �'!'/ ` • •'` km wide,in this
satellite image.
" s :. • •
POLLUTION
Taming toxic algal blooms
trogen Cutting phosphorus pollution makes lakes clear again, genera as phosphorus to thrive and grow.In
general,when the ratio of nitrogen to phos-
but some experts are calling for nitrogen cuts too phorus is low,the microorganisms'growth
is limited by nitrogen,and when ratio is
JANET PELLEY,special to C&EN high,phosphorus controls the growth rate.
But these simple rules get more complicated
im he trouble began for Toledo,Ohio,in the spring of 2014, and difficult to applywhen water quality
managers attempt to controlblooms on an
when extreme storms washed an unusually high pulse of ecosystem scale.
J1. nutrients into Lake Erie.By late summer,a massive bloom
of blue-green algae,otherwise known as cyanobacteria,had The phosphorus paradigm
shut down the city's drinking water system. When growing numbers of lakes turned
Powered by nutrients from agricultural with nutrient-polluted waters—allow them pea green in the 196os,researchers couldn't
runoff and the warm,calm summer waters, to dominate as they never have be fore, agree on what was driving the overgrowth
the algae spread across the lake and slow- says Hans Paerl,an aquatic ecologist at the of algae,says David Schindler,an aquatic
lybegan releasing toxins into the water. University of North Carolina,Chapel Hi1L A ecologist with the University of Alberta.A
The most common of these,microcystin, recent study found lakes in every province leadingtheory promoted by the detergent
showed up at levels of 2.5 pg/L exceeding of Canada with microcystin levels above industry held that carbon,not phosphorus,
the safe threshold of 1=pg/L set by the World the WHO guideline(Can.J.Fish.Aquat caused blooms.Industry based the claim on
Health Organization(WHO).The city has Sci.'2012,DOI:1o.1139/f2o12-o88).And the short-term experiments inwhich scientists
been spending$3 million to$4 million per U.S.Geological Survey reported this year scooped up lake water in bottle,added
year treating the water supply. that scientists found microcystin in 39%of carbon,and waited to see how much algal
"Harmful algal blooms are one of the streams in the southeastern U.S.at levels production ensued.
worst water quality issues that we need to up to 3.2 pg/L(Environ.Toxicol.Chem.2016, "But a bottle is not a lake,and a few days
deal with across the globe,"says Diane Ori- DOI:io.aooz/etc.3391)• are not a summer,"says Stephen Carpenter,
hel,an aquatic ecologist at the University of Scientists and regulators have been tack- an aquatic ecologist at the University ofWis-
Ottawa.The U.S.economy loses$z billion ling the issue,calling for cuts to pollution of consin,Madison.He explains that although
per year from damages that require expen- phosphorus,a nutrient of choice for toxic short-term assays can tell you which nutd-
sive water treatment and result in property algae.But researchers have been noticing entis limiting growth during abrief moment
tit g devaluation and declines in fish stocks. that in some polluted lakes,such as China's in time,they don't capture the complicated
p_ `Because cyanobacteria produce brain and Lake Taihu,cyanobacteria have become so long-term dynamics of awhole ecosystem.
liver toxins,there are cases of livestock, sated with phosphorus that their growth is Schindler put an end to the carbon
pets,and humans getting sick and even dy- held back by the relative scarcity of another theory in the mid-197os when he and his
ing from these blooms,"she says. favorite nutrient,nitrogen.So some sci- colleagues added phosphorus and nitrogen
Cyanobacteria have evolved over 3 bil- enlists are now controversially suggesting to an entire lake at Ontario's Experimental
to lion years to become wily competitors for that nitrogen should be controlled along Lakes Area.The lake turned green with
light and nutrients in lakes and rivers.Con- with phosphorus to tame algalblooms. algae,even though carbon levels were very
ditions today—a warmer climate combined Algae require 10 to 4o times as much ni- low.In a second lake with an hourglass
MARCH 21.2016 I CEN.ACS.ORG I CAEN-21
shape,the researchers constructed a barri-
er at the neck to split the lake in two.They Feeding frenzy
then added carbon and nitrogen to both ba- When lakes receive excess nitrogen(black)and phosphorus(orange),the
sins,but phosphorus onlyto one.The icon- nutrients accumulate in the lake as they cycle between algae,the water,
is photo of the green scummy phosphorus the air,and the sediment.
side against the clear blue nonphosphorus
side convinced regulators worldwide to ban Atmosphere N2 fixation A N2
phosphates in detergent and cut phospho- -
rus discharges from sewage plants. '
When scientists add phosphorus to
lakes,Schindler explains,algae respond in
the springtime with a big bloom dominated : , - -
by diatoms and other species that aquatic .1' '
crustaceans like to eat.However,as the -�
Outflow
bloom grows,the algae consume all the runoff '
dissolved inorganic nitrogen in the lake and ,
become what is called"nitrogen-limited." ,
So in midsummer to earlyfall,cyano- Groundwater ,
bacteria that can extract gaseous nitrogen
from the atmosphere and convert it into - --
more useful molecular forms take over the
( ,
lake.In fact,scientists arguing against the +
idea that nitrogen should be controlled to i
tame algal blooms point to cyanobacteria's Sediment
ability to"fix"nitrogen to bolster their Dissolved - storage
case.They say that the nitrogen fixers never ---- Particulate u
actually become nitrogen-limited. Gas
In any case,when the algal crop dies as
cold weather descends,its remnants sink
to the bottom of the lake where they enrich of salt-based sulfide to react with,leaving "Lake Taihu is dominated by cyanobac-
the sediment. phosphorus much more available to algae teriathat don't fix nitrogen,so they require
In spring,that sediment releases stored compared with nitrogen in saltwater. external nitrogen in puts,"Paerl says:The
phosphorus and,along with.externalnputs Add nitrogen to these coastal systems— lake receives urban and agricultural waste
such as agricultural runoff,drives another either from agricultural runoff or from the from awatershed that supports about ti%
year's bloom.Over years and years,a lake air—and blooms take off,Paerl says:His of the Chinese economy.When Paerl and
accrues avast store of phosphorus,nitro- research on North Carolina's Neuse River his team addedvarying levels of nutrients
gen,and carbon that can cycle from sedi- estuary has demonstrated that although to mesocosms—fiberglass closed-bottom
inent to algal:bloom and back again. phosphate detergent bans and phosphorus cylinders—suspended in the lake,they
With excess phosphorus added to lakes controls on sewage plants improved the triggered the most growth when they
these days from pollution,these bodies of upper freshwater reaches ofthewatershed, added phosphorus and nitrogen together
water might seem nitrogen-limited.Still, nitrogen levels increased downstream in (PLOS One 2014,DOI:10.1371/journal.
phosphorus-control advocates point to the coastal waters,generating nuisance pone.oii3ia3) Paerl and his Chinese col-
case studies of the Great Lakes and many algal blooms(Environs Sci.Technol.zooq, leagues have convinced officials to reduce
European lakes showing that,when phos- DOI:>.oaoai/eso35235o). both phosphorus and nitrogen inputs to the m
phorus additions cease,a lake can regain Scientists have documented nitro- lake until the nutrients stored in the sedi- m
its clarity,demonsu ating that the lake is gen-driven blooms along coasts worldwide, ment are depleted. a-
actually includingthose from the Gulf of Mexico to `But it's not so easy to remove nitrogen
China's Yangtze River Delta,Paerl says. because nitrogen compounds are very sol- f
Dual nutrient control The European Union's Water Framework uble,and they can't be precipitated out like
Directive sets nutrient criteria for both phosphorus is at the wastewater treatment
Still,one group of scientists doesn't phosphorus and nitrogen to protect coastal plant,"Paerl says.Removing nitrogen from 7
think phosphorus is the end of the story. waters.But some experts are saying that wastewater will require running the water S
"We need toworry about controlling both dual nutrient control could benefit freshwa- over special bacteria that sequester the ele- o
nitrogen and phosphorus in lakes because ter lakes as well.Wurtsbaugh has pored over ment and convert it into other forms. .,
freshwater ecosystems are linked to coastal past studies in which scientists manipulated m
o
waters that are typically nitrogen-limited," nutrient loads in 20 freshwater lakes.He Time and space matter
says Wayne Wurtsbaugh,anaquatic ecol- found that lakes fertilized with phosphorus z
ogist at Utah State University.Saltwater alone or nitrogen alone experienced a two- While the different scientific camps—
chemistry makes phosphorus much more to threefold increase in algal biomass.But those that advocate for only phosphorus Z
abundant than nitrogen in marine waters.In when researchers enriched lakes with both control versus those that advocate for dual
freshwater systems rich in iron,phosphorus phosphorus and nitrogen,the algal crop phosphorus and nitrogen control—continue 2
binds to the iron,forming ferrous phosphate ballooned by a factor of to.The findings hint to argue,others take a middle ground."The w
minerals that are not available for algae to that phosphorus and nitrogen act in a syner- arguments over limiting nutrients are com- a
consume.But in saline systems,iron has lots gistic way on algal production,he says. patible ifyou think deeply enough about the
22 CaEN I CEN.ACS.ORG I MARCH 21,2016
OH C Y,
3_
} r H p �, ®Saxitoxin is a sodium channel 11911y0 Meet l h e o Lp blocker so lethal that the U.S. p
® Qphs ""' p HN once considered developing it as H
- NH a chemical weapon.The toxin HN
cyanotoxins NH
° -- NH paralyzes the respiratory system, HN N NH
N p �° killing victims in a matter of pH H
More deadly than cobra venom and potent H OH minutes.Francis Gary Powers,
enough to be weaponized,cyanotoxins come Saxitoxin
9 P Y H,N NH the U-2 spy plane pilot who was
in a wide variety of forms that scientists are shot down over the U.S.S.R.in 1960,refrained from
working hard to analyze."We need good tools NH using the small dose of saxitoxin he carried with him
to identify toxins so we can see whether our Microcystln-LR to commit suicide in case he was captured.
management interventions are improving ►When researchers in North
water quality,"says Keith Loftin,a research America probe an algal
chemist with the U.S.Geological Survey. bloom,the most common H o OH
When Loftin's team descends on a bloom, cyanotoxin they encounter is ° s0 - o
the researchers take water-samples and microcystin,a large cyclic N YNH HN'TrNH
run them through a quick screening assay peptide ring sporting seven NH p
to identify which general classes of toxins amino acids that can vary(one p BOO'°°�
are present."Assays such as enzyme-linked version containing lysine and II.Much smaller 0Y Inarospermopsln
immunosorbent assays(ELISAs)are relatively arginine is shown here).Some than microcystin, ►Many types of
quick,easy to use,and inexpensive.' he says. researchers have compared anatoxin-a is a cyanobacteria produce
Once the screening process pinpoints what the structure with that of the bicyclic amine cylindrospermopsin,an
class of toxin is present in a sample,the sci- peptide antibiotic gramicidin. alkaloid with alkaloid toxin with a complex
entists turn to triple-quadrupole mass spec- Microcystin is produced by the a cocainelike heterocyclic multiring system.
trometry to precisely determine the specific cyanobacteria Microcystis and architecture.It The toxin targets the liver
identity of the toxin they are dealing with."We many other species.If ingested is a neurotoxin and kidneys.Symptoms can
have good tools for identifying toxins,but one by an animal,microcystin that leads to include vomiting,bloody
thing we lack are certified reference toxins to causes bleeding into liver respiratory failure diarrhea,and liver and kidney
use with the mass spectrometry because the tissue that rapidly leads to so swiftly it has damage.Cylindrospermopsin,
toxins are expensive and difficult to synthe- death.Chronic exposure to the its own handle, like all the cyanotoxins,
size,"Loftin says.Currently,he has to make toxin can promote tumors in very fast death bioaccumulates in freshwater
his own reference standards for the toxins. the liver and colon. factor. food webs.
importance of time and spatial scales,"says arguing about what's limiting algal growth," oped a new forecasting and tracking system
Robert Sterner,an aquatic ecologist and di- Sterner says.The argument will continue, for blooms.The seasonal forecast models
rector ofthe Large Lakes Observatory at though,until there is a long-term whole- rely primarily on measurements of nutrient
University of Minnesota,Duluth lake experiment like the one conducted by runoff from farms."The model shows that
The researchers who advocate for phos- Schindler in the 197os on adding nitrogen while nitrogen may explain some of the
phorus as the limiting nutrient are looking alone rather than phosphorus,he says. bloom size,phosphorus is the best predic-
at lake processes over annual and decadal tor of the bloom,"says Daniel R.Obenour,
timescales for which phosphorus is import- an environmental engineer at North Caro-
New strategies to cope
ant.The scientists championing nitrogen as line State University.The weekly tracking
the controlling factor are looking at short- As with many of Canada's prairie lakes system employs sample data,models of
term events such as a sudden late-summer and reservoirs,Alberta's Lake Nakamun is cyanobacteria growth,and satellite data to
bloom so immense,it has consumed most high in phosphorus but low in iron.So the predict the size and locations of blooms on
of the available nitrogen and is nowlimited University of Ottawa's Orihel,a phospho- Lake Erie.
by that nutrient. rus-control advocate,wondered whether The U.S.and Canada recently agreed
A growing body of research shows that adding iron could lock up the phosphorus to cut phosphorus loading into Lake Erie
elevated nitrogen levels influence the mix of in the water by forming ferrous phosphate. by 40%.Even if the management goals for
cyanobacteria species in blooms and make When Orihel and her team fertilized Lake Erie emphasize phosphorus at the
them more toxic,Sterner says.Other studies open-bottom mesocosms in Nakamun expense of nitrogen,the best management
indicate that the amount of nitrogen in the with iron,the treatment cut phosphorus practices to control phosphorus runoff
system has a secondary role in controlling concentrations bY56 to 72%in open water, from farms,such as improving fertilizer
the biomass of a bloom.But municipalities suppressed cyanobacteria blooms,and even application and planting vegetative buffer
maywant to pause before removing phos- kept microcystin concentrations belowwa- zones that sop up nutrients,will have apos-
phorus and nitrogen from sewage because ter quality guidelines.`But this is not a silver itive impact on cutting both phosphorus
it can cost four to eight times as much as bullet strategy;it must be used in conjunc- and nitrogen,Obenour says.
removing phosphorus alone."In addition, tion with efforts to cut nutrient pollution," But a specific focus on nitrogen would be
the science right now isn't strong enough Orihel says. expensive and difficult to achieve because
to predict the benefits of agiven amount of Adding iron to tie up phosphorus may it might entail changing or cutting back
nitrogen reduction,"Sterner says. work for small anemic lakes but wouldn't crop production."We know we can manage
"Because of all the remarkable research be practical or affordable for a large body nitrogen,"Obenour says,"but we haven't
that has been done on nutrients,it is shock- such as Lake Erie.To protect human health decided if the costs are worth the improve-
ing to find ourselves in the year 2.016 still around Lake Erie,researchers have devel- ment in water quality."■
MARCH 21,2016 I CEN.ACS.ORG I CAEN 23