The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 10/27/1988 October 27 , 1988 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board met on this date at 9: 00 A.M. in the Conference Room of the Administration Building at Golden Gate Community Park, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Chairman: Ron Burton Vice Chairman: Scott McQuillin Fred Thomas Absent: Charles Stevens ALSO PRESENT: Leon Williams, Immokalee resident; Cliff Crawford, Parks and Recreation Director; Barbara Johnson, Parks and Recreation Secretary. AGENDA I . Call Meeting to Order II. Approval of Minutes from September 22 , 1988 III. Approval of Minutes from special meeting on October 14, 1988 IV. Old Business A. Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Vacancy, District II V. New Business A. Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Vacancies Resignation - District V Term Expiring - District I B. Update of Willow Run Proposal C. Summary Parks Impact Fee Proposal VI. Adjourn The meeting was opened by Chairman Ron Burton. Mr. Thomas introduced Leon Williams from Immokalee. MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 22, 1988 MEETING - Approved 3-0 MINUTES OF OCTOBER 14, 1988 SPECIAL MEETING - IMMOKALEE MIDDLE SCHOOL LAND SWAP - Approved 3-0. PARAB VACANCIES - Mr. Crawford: We have received applications for the position open on the Advisory Board for District II. Mr. Burton's (District I) term is expiring 12/31/88 and District V now has a vacancy due to the resignation of Mr. Thomas. Mr. Burton: Between now and the November meeting there should be more applications arriving, these additional applications could be forwarded to Board members for review and the applicants could be invited to the November meeting. Recommendations can then be made and the positions filled by the first of the year. We have to interview these applicants before we make a decision. Some of the applicants do not even show up for the interview and that helps make the decision real fast. Mr. Thomas: I do not remember interviewing anyone. Mr. Burton: I believe there was only one applicant when Donna's position was vacant. Consideration should be given to the people in the District that apply over people applying from another District. I entertain a MOTION that we interview all applicants for District I, II, and V at one time and make recommendations to pass on to the Board of County Commissioners. Approved 3-0 . Mr. Burton does not plan on applying for another term. He has served two terms, and unless there are no applicants, is not eligible for the third term. Mr. Burton: We should also address the date of the November meeting. Thanksgiving Day is the last Thursday of the month. Mr. McQuillin: MOTION: November meeting be held on Tuesday, November 22nd at 9:00 AM. Approved 3-0. OLD BUSINESS: 1. Vanderbilt Boat Ramp - Mr. Crawford: We have received three different proposals which are being reviewed by the staff. 2 . Lighted baseball field - scheduled for the Board of County Commissioners' action on November 8th agenda. Mr. Thomas: What is the construction going on in Immokalee Community Park? Mr. Crawford: It is the playground. 3. Letter of Recognition for Dan Loubier - sent 4. Status of construction bids for East Naples Community Park - Specifications are being redrafted and have been submitted to Purchasing. The County Attorney's office has them under review and they were then sent back to Wilson, Miller to make some changes in the legal language. They will be ready to go out to bid as soon as they are received, probably next week. After coming back from the State convention I made contact with other operations involved in construction and have added to our bid list for contractors and subcontractors. We are hoping that they will bid, or make it a more competitive process. Mr. McQuillin: Won't the contractors take care of the subcontractors? Mr. Crawford: Yes, to a certain extent. Nidy has expressed interest in bidding on all project's. Mr. Burton: Sometimes that happens. Mr. Thomas: What is the exception of Wilson Miller on the Immokalee Middle School? (This was in reference to the BCC approval of the land swap of Immokalee Middle School. ) Mr. Crawford: Before awarding any contracts the Board of County Commissioners want staff engineers to evaluate before looking for outside professional services. It may be a policy or a guideline. Mr. Thomas: We have to wait for a recommendation before approving Wilson, Miller for design? Mr. Crawford: They are asking if we can do it in-house first; otherwise the proposal was approved as presented. Mr. Burton: Any other old business? NEW BUSINESS 1. Vacancies on the Board have already been discussed. 2 . Willow Run Proposal - Site is located on 951, north of the Sports Park - the Bonness tract - a Letter of Intent was sent from the Attorney's office to proceed with that, and the Conceptional Master Plan is being finished. We have contacted the Water Department for the quality of the water; it is good for everything except swimming. A detailed process to follow through is necessary, and we are going to wait to initiate that based on Board action. The issue that needs to be considered is one of funding - some want a general bond issue, some feel the County should purchase the land and then have a bond to construct the facility. We are receiving various approaches from the Board of County Commissioners, and as the Board is changing we want some common denomination for what the Board wants to do. Mr. Thomas: How fixed is the site for Willow Run Park? Mr. Crawford: We asked for directions, there were several site options for a regional park. The Board of County Commissioners told us to focus on this property. Mr. Thomas: I received information that they are looking at a piece of property on 846. Mr. Burton: It was one of the original choices. Mr. McQuillin: I do not understand why these people want to make the terms so favorable for acquiring the property. I do not understand that, there must be some ulterior motive. Mr. Burton: The price was that great because you are buying a lot of lake. Mr. McQuillin The removal of fill they are going to receive was almost enough to pay for it. I would think there would be other organizations that might be interested in doing the same thing. Mr. Burton: When that site was considered, 846, it is a great deal - selling rock and then selling the lake. Mr. McQuillin: A lake is not needed on the site. Mr. Crawford: If it does not become a park site it will be a development with Mr. Thomas: The site is more central for all of the County. Mr. Burton: It was one of the first sites picked, it is a central location, it is a good area and would draw people from Fort Myers. Mr. Thomas: How much is being charged per acre for Willow Run? Mr. Crawford: From $6, 750 to 9, 000 per acre, it varies with the tract. It is based on the price of other property in the area. Mr. Thomas: How much land is available for use. Mr. Burton: It is only worth something if someone wants water. Mr. Crawford: Some other property may not have as much uplands. There are 200-202 acres of uplands that could be used for development. Many other tracts have a lot more wetlands. Mr. Burton: The site on 846 was recently added to the Wildlife Water Management so there is a lot of wetlands. Mr. Crawford: The State tried to acquire 10, 000 acres in that area. They want to make a wetland out of it. The actual upland area for park land development would be 30 or 40 acres. There is not much acreage for use. Mr. Thomas: My concern is that Willow Run is hard to get to. Mr. Crawford: The other thing at Willow Run is there are also improvements being made in terms of roads, getting contouring done - we could have access of 160 acres. Mr. Burton: The County fair grounds now has a permanent location? Mr. Crawford: Yes. Mr. Burton: The fair ground is more accessible to Immokalee than to the other people of the County. Mr. Thomas: Those two lakes on 846, how deep are they? Mr. Crawford: Probably 40 to 50 feet. Mr. Burton: They cannot be stocked for some years. Mr. Crawford: If there are options, we want to look at them. Mr. Thomas: I heard talk about it in higher circles. Mr. Burton: The County is not committed to Willow Run? Mr. Crawford: No. The Board talked to Staff and instructed them to get the information on it and keep them informed. Mr. Burton: I read about a golf course. Mr. Crawford: This came from the Manager's office. It is a par 3 , par 54 hole course surrounded by intense residential development. The cost and operations were evaluated with both positive and negative features. Mr. Burton: Why did that not come before PARAB? Mr. Crawford: It came direct from the Manager's office. Mr. Burton: But you had to report back to the Board of County Commissioners, and had no input from PARAB. Mr. Crawford: The course was not a full regulation course, had a swimming pool which was not large enough for our use, . . . Mr. Burton: Well at this point it is too late, but it should have come to PARAB before going to the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Crawford: A quick decision was needed. Mr. Burton: We are now having the County Manager decide what goes before PARAB and what does not. The Commissioners prefer to see anything that goes before them go to PARAB. If there are any problems they are going to refer it back to us. This is why we are donating our time and then some things get here and some things may get to the Board of County Commissioners and some may not. The Commissioners there today would not like it. Mr. Thomas: I would like to see a listing so that we can see what is going on. Mr. Crawford: We try to get all matters before PARAB. There are a lot of factors to take into consideration. Mr. Burton: If time is of the essence, maybe they do not need an Advisory Board. Mr. Crawford: If an item like the golf course acquisition, we could say that PARAB needs to review it first. . .deals with a lot of issues. Mr. Thomas: They had to get a quick answer back. Mr. Burton: It still needs to go before PARAB. I think they would be breaking the law. Mr. Thomas: The intent is PARAB is a vehicle for input for parks and recreation. If they want to decide themselves, they have the flexibility to do that. Mr. Burton: A member of the Board of County Commissioners cannot act on any other board. Mr. Thomas: It happens on all Boards and there is not a lot you can do about it, it allows for citizen input, they can act on it. Mr. Burton: Maybe it should be rewritten to say that PARAB acts on anything the Board of county Commissioners wants them to act on and not everything that goes before the Board. You cannot say one thing and then do another. If they decide they want to do what they please, do they need us? Pass my displeasure along to Kevin. Impact Fees: Impact fees have been talked about to pay for new growth. The County hired consultants and the proposal is broken down into two parts, County parks and regional parks. It is similar to most impact fees already in place with two exceptions. It deals with two issues, Marco Island and other low income housing. The guide lines include a provision for low income housing not to pay impact fees because it might add to the cost of low income housing and make it unavailable. While not exempt, the fees will be paid through the general fund of the County. All taxpayers will pay for it. The other exception is Marco Island. All community park needs have been met; although some improvements are to be done, they will be funded within the Comprehensive Plan and are not large amounts. Impact fees could be used for anything - buy land, improvements, etc. The money would have to be spent within 6 years or it would revert back to the Developer or who paid the fee, if improvements were not made. There will be a public hearing Wednesday, November 2 , 1988, 9: 00 AM. General public meetings are being held now; it will be two to three months before it goes into effect. It is something that should have been had years ago. As you know that will help pay for the new growth, five to six million dollars for construction of facilities impacted by our new folks. I disagree with the two exceptions - new growth pays for new growth. The standards have been met and we could bank that money. Low income housing and moderate income housing people are the people who benefit most from the park facilities. People should help pay for that impact fee - over a period of a 30 year mortgage it would not make it unaffordable. Meeting adjourned. _ - - -' - __ ~ _ -�~ • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE BID #RFP 88-1225 BE AWARDED TO NAPLES VENDING OB3ECTIVE : Recommend to the Board of County ComMissioners that bid #RFP 88-1225 , a proposal to supply vending mach.ines at public parks , be awarded to Naples Vending . CONSIDERATIONS : On February 19th the Purchasing Department and Parks & Recreation Department advertised bid #RFP 88-1225 , to supply vending machines at public parks . Three (3) bids were received from the following companies : Southwest Florida Vending , Ft . Miyers Coca Cola Bottling and Naples Vending . The bids were opened on March 19th . Naples Vending provided the only complete bid . Additionally , Naples Vending showed the greatest financial return to the County at 20% , the highest of all three (3) companies. FISCAL IMPACT : Additional revenue from vending machines is undetermined at this time . r~~ RECOMMENDATION : Based upon the completed packet and greatest financial return to the County , the Parks & Recreation staff and Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommend that the Board of County Commissioners award bid #RFP 88-1225 to Naples Vending and authorize the Parks & Recreation 'Department and County Attorney's Office to draft a contract for services . Once the contract is drafted it will be brought to the Board of County Commissioners for approval . Prepared by Date Daniel P . Loubier • Parks & Recreation Superintendent ^ ' Reviewed by : Date Clifford Crawford Parks & Recreation Director Reviewed by Date Steve Carnell Purchasing Director Reviewed by Date Kevin O'Donnell Public Services Administrator • ` PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER 27, 1988 The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting will be held on Thursday, October 27, 1988 at 9 : 00 A.M. in the Parks and Recreation Administration Building, Conference Room, 3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard. I. Call Meeting to Order II. Approval of Minutes from September 22 , 1988 meeting III. Approval of Minutes from special meeting on October 14, 1988 IV. Old Business A. Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Vacancy, District II V. New Business A. Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Vacancies Resignation - District V Term Expiring - District I B. Update of Willow Run Proposal C. Summary Parks Impact Fee Proposal VI. Adjourn September 22, 1988 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board met on this date at 9: 00 A.M. in the Conference Room of the Administration Building at Golden Gate Community Park, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Vice Chairman: Scott McQuillin Charles Stevens Fred Thomas, Jr. Absent: Chairman, Ron Burton Donna Baltakis ALSO PRESENT: Kevin O'Donnell, Public Services Administrator; Cliff Crawford, Parks and Recreation Director; Murdo Smith, Acting Parks and Recreation Superintendent; Marilyn McGinty, Recreation Superintendent; Barbara Johnson, Parks and Recreation Secretary. AGENDA I. Call Meeting to Order II. Approval of Minutes from August 25, 1988 meeting III. Additional Agenda Items IV. Old Business A. Status of items previously voted on B. Proclamation Edward "Ski" Olesky V. New Business A. Recommendation to award Trophy Bid B. East Naples Community Park Water Agreement VI. Adjourn Mr. Scott McQuillin, Vice Chairman, conducted the meeting in the absence of Ron Burton, Chairman. MINUTES OF AUGUST 25, 1988 MEETING - Motion made that the minutes be approved so discussion could be held. Mr. Thomas: Last page of minutes, it was Mr. Thomas and not Mr. Burton %my that recommended a resolution be written honoring Edward C. "Ski" Olesky. (This is the correct spelling of name. ) MOTION: MINUTES BE ACCEPTED WITH CORRECTION. Approved 3-0. STATUS OF ISSUES PREVIOUSLY VOTED ON 1. Vanderbilt Inn and Boat Ramp Study - Due to conflicts of appointments Mr. Crawford was unable to contact the owner. It is on his agenda to speak with the owner this week. 2 . Dan Loubier's Recognition - Mr. Crawford is checking on the letter recognizing Dan's service to the County. 3 . Lighted Ball Field at Golden Gate - Mr. O'Donnell: This Executive Summary is being redrafted. It should be coming before the Board within the next couple of weeks. 4 . Resignation of Donna Baltakis - A written letter of resignation has not yet been received from Mrs. Baltakis. Mr. Thomas: MOTION: DUE TO ORAL RESIGNATION RECEIVED BY STAFF AND THE FACT THAT MRS. BALTARIS HAS MISSED THREE (3) CONSECUTIVE MEETINGS, PARAB DECLARES THE POSITION VACANT. Mr. Stevens: Add "in accordance with the ordinance" and I second the motion. Discussion was held regarding the proper way to proceed. Mr. O'Donnell: The Board of County Commissioners has to take action for appointments, so I would (:. think that the motion is appropriate and I will follow it with a memo to Nancy Israelson's office. MOTION APPROVED 3-0. 5. Bids for Part I Phase II Construction of East Naples Community Park - this has been taken care of - BCC voted to re-advertise. 6. Immokalee Middle School - Department is still working on this and is waiting for an evaluation report which is due next week. 7 . New Beach Parking Fees - Mr. O'Donnell: Tonight will be the final budget meeting and it will be on the BCC Agenda for the 27th of September. 8 . Park Ranger To Enforce Ordinances - Mr. O'Donnell: The Board of County Commissioners agreed with the concept of the Executive Summary, but due to a report from the Finance Director it raised a question whether or not we can have the park ranger issue citations. It was moved that we work with the County Attorney's office regarding this matter. Mr. Crawford: Because we are a non-charted county the State does not grant the park ranger the authority to issue citations. At the present time if citations were issued by the ranger, a problem would arise when the case went to court. We are requesting an amendment to the present State ruling. I expect to receive some information from Tallahassee within the next two weeks. Mr. Thomas: If lobbying is necessary you should be working on it immediately as the time frame has been changed. Discussion was held as to whether the C Legislature would make amendment provisions to an individual county. Mr. O'Donnell: Each year the County puts together a legislature packet. Mr. Thomas: This needs to be done quicker this year. If it does not go through, what problem would there be contracting with the Sheriff's Department to assign a sheriff to you - one of their officers creating a position within their structure. He would be assigned to you and paid by you. Mr. O'Donnell: Supervision might be a problem. Mr. Thomas: It would be the same relationship the County has with the schools, he reports to the school officials, would that work for the ranger. Mr. McQuillin: The perception might be that if it is a person from the Sheriff's Department, people would feel that he would be there because a law was broken, and that would not happen with a ranger. Mr. Crawford: We are not having a person just for security - the ranger will be interested in other things also. Mr. McQuillin: We talked about horses, when are those going to be used? Mr. Smith: We are currently in the process of training the horses. Becky is working on that right now. Mr. McQuillin: We are not waiting for rangers then. Mr. O'Donnell: We have two horses and they have to be broken and worked by the Rangers. Mr. McQuillin: Are those horses the ones that were being starved? Mr. O'Donnell: No, (pfthose were Arabians and these are Quarter horses. 9 . Red Ribbon Week: The County needed a person to put together a Resolution and Executive Summary for the purchase of ribbon to signify support of the "Say No to Drugs" campaign. Miss McGinty did this last year and was requested to do it again this year. The $450 approved by the Board of County Commissioners does not come from our budget. The ribbons are not purchased directly from the Naples Informed Parents as the price would be too high. Ribbon is purchased, bows made by County employee volunteers, and distributed throughout County offices, used on County vehicles, etc. This is in support of the program and not using the tax payers money. The Board of County Commissioners has a special fund for various groups that need funding, and the money is coming from it. OLD BUSINESS: 1. Proclamation for "Ski Olesky" - This proclamation will come before the Board of County Commissioners on October 4th. Mr. Thomas and Mr. Olesky will be present. No action is needed as it was previously taken. NEW BUSINESS: ( 1. Recommendation to award Bid 88-1308 Trophies - Miss McGinty: Six bids went out and two came back. I recommend that we award the bid to Trophy Case; we have done business with them in the past and their bottom line total was the lowest. The Purchasing Department gave advice as to the (:) procedure on this type of bid - no exact number of needed plaques and trophies is available as it depends upon the number of participants in a program. Approximately 800 - 1, 100 trophies are needed and it will cost approximately $9, 000 to $10, 000 for the year. Mr. Thomas: You will have at least one of each one of these trophies being awarded, the total is the base bid. This $166 is the sum total of all of these types that we will be buying. Mr. McQuillin: It may not be justified to just add up columns of figures. Miss McGinty: We have gone through and looked to see which ones we need to buy. Section I - 250, Section II - 200, Section III - 300, etc. We are going to start using plaques this year, probably 100. The Purchasing Department advised us to go with the total price, and Trophy Case still came out low. Mr. McQuillin: Is there any way to buy trophies from one and plaques from another? Miss McGinty: It is easier working with one company. Mr. Stevens: MOVE THAT WE AWARD BID 88-1308 TO TROPHY CASE. SECONDED BY MR. THOMAS. APPROVED 3-0. 2. EAST NAPLES COMMUNITY PARK WATER AGREEMENT - Mr. Smith: East Naples Community Park is being built on Thomasson Drive. At the present time to get potable water to i the facility we need this Agreement with the City as the City 1! owns the water main. We have to enter into an agreement with the City to supply us with service until the County takes over the service for this area. Mr. Thomas: Any price? Mr. Smith: No costs are available yet. Heyward Boyce did some rearranging of valves to cut costs but I cannot tell you what the cost of materials is. Mr. Thomas: What about the cost of the water? Mr. Crawford: The cost of water is related to the size of the meters, etc. We had asked that question before and were told the Agreement had to be signed, and the materials had not been priced out. Mr. Smith: There will be one master meter and 2 or 3 single meters, and I am not sure of the price of water itself. Mr. Thomas: Does the City charge for water and sewer at the same time? Mr. Crawford: Yes, unless it is an irrigation meter. There is a standard rate per thousand gallons for water consumption, and an additional charge based on the size of the meter. Naturally a 2" meter would be cheaper than a 6" meter. This is the particular type of analysis that Heyward Boyce went through. Mr. Thomas: This Agreement would be for five years? Mr. Smith: Hopefully less than that. Mr. Thomas: MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THIS ITEM. (EAST NAPLES COMMUNITY PARK WATER AGREEMENT) SECONDED BY MR. STEVENS. APPROVED 3-0. Mr. Thomas: I want the staff to look into the review of the minimum contract so if service is available from the County before five years, we can get out of the contract. Mr. McQuillin: Any other items? Mr. Crawford: Yes. 1. We have a draft resolution requesting financial assistance under the Florida Development Assistance Program for development of East Naples Community Park. The State offers through various grant programs available for construction of parks, construction of facilities, funded for administration by DNP. The grant amount available is approximately $120, 000 for each application. We have a project that meets that criteria for construction of a facility at East Naples. This resolution is part of the material that will be necessary for a grant review and funding for our project. We have the necessary permits, etc. , which are required to be submitted. This also generates additional ways to meet or improve our facilities. 2 . Reviewing bids that we need additional resources will provide us with additional funding. It is a matching program. We are allowed to request this money without any additional funds by the County. We are hoping to become a part of an annual program for funding through this resource for development of our park system. Mr. Thomas: MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THIS AND TO CORRECT THE VOTE THAT IS LISTED ON THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FROM 4-0 TO 3-0. MR. STEVENS: Is this just for initial connstruction? Mr. Crawford: No. The question was raised whether a lighted baseball field would be eligible for this. Yes, but a higher rating would be for resources versus recreational. East Naples has sensitive areas and that would be the best project. The baseball field would be eligible but with a lower priority. One grant is awarded per year per Department. Mr.Crawford: We should go for the highest priority if we can do it. Mr. Stevens: If the new ball field would be a lower priority maybe we could do that next year. Mr. Thomas: By next year we may have something that would be more important. Mr. Crawford: The submittal period closes October 1. Mr. McQuillin: What does it mean by resource facility? Mr. Crawford: If we are using those funds for things that are water based - board walks, dune cross-overs, developing a new beach facility. Resource activities include ball fields, jogging trails, etc. We will have a very strong application. Mr. McQuillin: Maybe there are other projects that you would have a better shot at. Mr. Crawford: I talked with the State and told them what we are looking for and this would be a good project. One requirement is to have all of your permits in hand when the application is submitted. We would not have the permits in hand for any other projects that we would be considering. East Naples is the only project for which we have all the requirements Ar" completed. Mr. McQuillin: I do not remember us making this application in the past. Mr. Crawford: We had requested funds to assist in the acquisition of East Naples park land. Mr. McQuillin: Are we looking for projects in the future that we will be applying for? Mr. O'Donnell: The Growth Management Plan says where facilities will be going - boat ramps is an example - and would qualify for the program. Mr. Stevens SECONDED. APPROVED 3-0. Mr. McQuillin: Any other items? Meeting adjourned 9: 50 A.M. 379 v-�� . A k ' � �`3'ka' : ' FROM THE DESK OF a FRED N. THOMAS, JR. - a ---' .-eti '"' 4f r5 t A c t �� a / / lam'' 1 h�i S�Yd •V S � �� Ate' � � M ► �� t � � b N � C . ., v t (L %5 u ' . � � �� i /.lrr'mil P R E S S R E L E A S E FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE OCTOBER 3, 1988 Applicants are being sought for a vacant position on the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. The vacancy is to be filled by a resident and elector of County Commission District 5, which includes Immokalee and portions of Golden Gate Estates. The Parks and Recreation Board advises the County Commission on matters pertaining to the acquisition, development and programs involving the County' s park facilities. Citizens interested in applying for the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board are requested to submit a letter and a brief resume to the attention of Mrs. Nancy Israelson, Administrative Assistant, Board of County Commissioners, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 33962-4978. The deadline for acceptance of resumes is October 24, 1988 . For additional information, contact Mrs. Israelson at 774-8097. I # # # gS� 140A i tgQJ pad Pos\.∎ c av�s � G ' �� ° % I a Pease N - c, OPEPo L , � i ` ,- • O "P" °- 0� ( - a a 0 011r/ /ALI4k -1-1 -- -- 60 fOlk PN PPO - ' /` / { \—4 OPEAEQOPp\S NM /A / . °.4 O \`- 4.1\N\l floc(` ® et 0 jos (3 IG ,„....., r , fP/c- �L! October 4, 1988 Housing Authority Commissioner Anne Goodnight Board of County Commissioners Collier County Courthouse Complex Naples, Florida 33962-4977 Dear Commissioner Goodnight: Because of the press of my other civic duties, I respectfully request to be relieved of my duties as a member of the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board. As I promised you sometime ago, I did not submit this letter until I found an adequate replacement. Point of fact, my replacement in the person of Leon Williams will be a greater asset to the Recreation interest in Collier County than I. He is a native, educated in Florida (BethuneCookman '77) and a self-employed resident of Imrnokalee. I have confidence that he will do you proud. Again, thank you for allowing me the opportunity to serve. Sincerel ,. t • Fred N. T omas Jr., PHM Executive Director co c c-3 cp =`c"= FNT/el c' ° cc: file s ti� MEMORANDUM DATE: September 22 , 1988 TO: Nancy Israelson, Admin. Assistant to the Board FROM: Kevin O'Donnell, Public Services Administrato RE: PARAB Vacancy Please be advised that District 2 representative, Donna Baltakis, as of the 9/22 PARAB meeting, has missed her third consecutive meeting. Previously she tendered an oral resignation for personal reasons. At this juncture, I do not anticipate that we will be hearing further from Mrs. Baltakis in regards to her as a PARAB member. Therefore; will you, at your earliest convenience, take the necessary action to advertise for the vacancy so that the position may be filled. Should you have any questions, feel free to call. KO'D/cms cc: Cliff Crawford, Parks & Recreation Director ��arks & Recreation Advisory Board �: . � COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE COMPLEX ° NAPLES, FLORIDA 339627A9771 , ,s 2 , U1, 1i , .. 1*L11 ANNE GOODNIGHT JOHN A.PISTOR _ - e-11 MAX A.HASSE.JR. COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER i,Lim;_ _J, 1 1:�1L:_«j COMMISSIONER BURT L.SAUNDERS ARNOLD LEE GLASS JAMES C.GILES COMMISSIONER COMM ISSIONER CLERK October 18 , 1988 Mr. Ron Burton P. 0. Box 1098 Marco Island, Florida 33937 Subject: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Dear Mr. Burton: Your current term expires on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board on December 31 , 1988 . In accordance with the Advisory Board Ordinance, the attached press release has been sent to the newspapers throughout the county. Ordinance 86-41 , Section Seven, (b) ( 1 ) , states that "Terms of office for Board members shall be limited to two consecutive terms of service on any one Board. . . " . However, the Commission may waive that requirement should no other qualified applicants seek the position and the present member wishes reappointment. Our records indicate you have served two terms. We appreciate the time and effort you have put into the activities of this advisory committee . If you wish to be considered for possible reappointment, please submit a letter with an updated resume to this office before the November 7th deadline. If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to contact me at 774-8097 . Sincerely, Nancy Israelson Administr, i.ve Assistant /ni Attachment cc: Mr. Cliff Crawford, Parks and Recreation Director Mr. Kevin O' Donnell, Public Services Administrator P R E S S R E L E A S E FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE OCTOBER 14 , 1988 v The membership terms on several Collier County advisory committees are expiring in December, and the Board of County Commissioners is seeking resumes from citizens interested in volunteering to serve on the committees. All applicants must be residents and electors of Collier County. The Environmental Advisory Council has three positions to be considered. The council reviews development ,projects and makes recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners concerning the environmental impact on the County. Meetings are held monthly at the County Courthouse and members are required to file a Form 1 "Statement of Financial Interests" each year with the Supervisor of Elections. Both the Isles of Capri Fire Control District Advisory Committee and the Ochopee Fire Control District Advisory Committee have terms expiring in December. Applicants must reside within the boundaries of either fire control special taxing district. These committees review and make recommendations regarding the fire districts' operations and budget. The Library Advisory Board has three positions with terms expiring in mr.. December. The Library board advises the County Commission on the operations and proposed budget for the Collier County Library System. Meetings are held once a month. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board reviews matters concerning ;E acquisition, development and programs for park facilities in Collier .` County. The term for the representative of District 1 expires in �' December. Interested residents of the Marco Island/East Naples area are requested to submit a resume for consideration. Three positions on the Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Committee will also be up for review in December. Applicants must reside within the boundaries of the Golden Gate Community Center Special Taxing District. This committe assists in reviewing and making recommendations regarding the budget and operation of the Community Center. Residents interested in serving on any of these committees are requested to submit a letter and a brief resume to the attention of Mrs. Nancy Israelson , Administrative Assistant, Board of County Commissioners, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples , Florida 33962. Resumes must be received by November 7 , 1988 . Additional information may be obtained by calling Mrs. Israelson at 774-8097 . # # # P R E S S R E L E A S E 41!-;1 ; FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE SEPTEMBER 23 , 1988 Applicants are being sought for a vacant position on the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. The vacancy is to be filled by a resident and .elector of County Commission District 2. The Parks and Recreation Board advises the County Commission on matters pertaining .to the acquisition, development and programs involving the County' s park facilities. Citizens interested in applying for the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board are requested to submit a letter and a brief resume to the attention of Mrs. Nancy Israelson, Administrative Assistant,- Board of County Commissioners, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Napl lorida 33962-4978 . The deadline for acceptance of resumes is October —1988 . For additional information, contact M_ Israelson at 774-8097. 4 # # C-: G) \i .i. • RECEIVED SEP 2 3 1998 Public Services Div, . \er co •L• . October 4, 1988 Housing Authority Commissioner Anne Goodnight Board of County Commissioners Collier County Courthouse Complex Naples, Florida 33962-4977• '7 , Dear Commissioner Goodnight: Because of the press of my other civic duties, I respectfully request to be relieved of my duties as a member of the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board. As I promised you sometime ago, I did not submit this letter until I found an adequate replacement. Point of fact, my replacement in the person of Leon Williams will be a greater asset to the Recreation interest in Collier County than I. He is a native, educated in Florida (BethuneCookman '77) and a self-employed resident of Imrnokalee. I have confidence that he will do you proud. Again, thank you for allowing me the opportunity to serve. Sincerel ,. c Fred N. T omas Jr., PHM Executive Director ,_� FNT/el -- cc: file - rn P R E S S R E L E A S E FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE OCTOBER 3 , 1988 Applicants are being sought for a vacant position on the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. The vacancy is to be filled by a resident and elector of County Commission District 5, which includes Immokalee and portions of Golden Gate Estates. The Parks and Recreation Board advises the County Commission on matters pertaining to the acquisition, development and programs involving the County' s park facilities . Citizens interested in applying for the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board are requested to submit a letter and a brief resume to the attention of Mrs . Nancy Israelson, Administrative Assistant, Board of County Commissioners, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 33962-4978 . The deadline for acceptance of resumes is October 24 , 1988 . For additional information, contact Mrs. Israelson at 774-8097. • • • 411) # # # _ J ^ J c -- COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 2124 AIRPORT ROAD, SOUTH ADMINISTRATION SUITE 102 NAPLES, FL 33962 (813) 774-8468 A CERTLFIED BLUE CHIP COMMUNITY 3 Oc.oben 1988 Mn. Dan Loub.ien, Dinecton Kissimmee Pan(is S Recneat,.on Department P. 0. Box 1608 Kissimmee, FLon-ida 32742 Dean Dan: As you know, at one og the .has-t Pakks and Recreation Adv.isony Board meetings you attended, PARAB voted to have a - etten 4otcma ty sent to you commending the wonfi you did 4otc the County oven the .?ast six (6) years. I am happy to be the one who is sending you this £etten, not arty wishing you great success as Ditcectotc of Panlzs and Rectceation goo Kissimmee, but a most apptceciative thanks you on behat4 o4 evetcyane in Cottieic County 4on the exemp!a.tcy way in which you conducted younset4 dun.ing your sa. (6) years with the Department ab Paths and Recneati.on. Many sign tiicant projects that you pta yed a vitae pa'c't in were undentafzen dun.ing this peti.Lod o4 nap.id growth and have now gone beyond the idea stage to actual i.mptementation. Without yours he ep and coope'cat i.on these p'co jec is wowed have been most di6b.icu. t to have accomplished. I pensonatty enjoyed wo'i!Arig with you and I can even be o4 help to you in the tiutune, please advise. SLncene: , Kevin O'Donne t Pub/i.c Senv.ices Adm.in.istnaton • KO'D/cros cc: Ctii6 Cnawiond, Parks & Rec'ceatlon D.itcecton GC --e- /# w i/ 22/ePI M E M O R A N D U M t /W TO: Kevin O' Donnell, Public Services Administrator Cliff Crawford, Parks and Recreation Director FROM: Nancy Israelson, Administrative Assistant • RE: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board DATE: October 24 , 1988 Attached are the resumes we have received for the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board vacancies representing District 2 and District 5. The resumes are as follows : District 2: Robert B. Neuman Kim Patrick Kobza Andrew Hendricks Beverly Brenner-Morris District 5: Leon Williams Alan Chadwick In addition , Mr. Ron Burton' s term expires on December 31 , 1988 , and a press release has been issued announcing the possible vacancy. Please let me know if .you would like the appointments for District 2 and District 5 to be made by the Commission as soon as possible, or if you would suggest waiting a few more weeks for the District 1 resumes to be received and handle all appointments at one time. If you have any questions regarding these vacancies , please contact me . �G/(7LCCe-7 Nancy/5/4" aelson =_ G _ 7 /n - i Attachments r - - LEON WILLIAMS ///2_2, / 9 A/ 1211 S . 5TH. ST. IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA (813)657-2950 DESIRED POSITION: IMMOKALEE PARK & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE BOARD EDUCATION: IMMOKALEE HIGH SCHOOL, IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA GRADUATED 1974 BETHUNE COOKMAN COLLEGE, DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA GRADUATED 1977 CERTIFICATE: FLORIDA HEALTH & REHABILITATION SERVICES EXPERIENCE: 1978-1981 FLORIDA FARMP1ORKERS COUNCIL WEATHER EVALUATOR VISITING DIFFERENT HOMES IN THE COMMUNITY TO • DETERMINE WHAT WAS NEEDED TO REPAIR EACH HOME . 1981-1984 JESSIE' S DISCO LOUNGE MANAGER 1984-1984 . SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT COUNSELOR TO DETERMINE QUALIFICATIONS OF CETA PARTICIPANTS AND ELIGIBILITY FOR THE PROGRAM ALONG WITH COUNSELING PARTICIPANTS . 1984-1987 FLORIDA HEALTH & REHABILITATION SERVICES TO DETERMINE IF WOMEN WITH CHILD(REN) ARE ELIGIBLE TO RECIVE STATE ASSISTANCE , 1987- SELF EMPLOYED LEON WILLIAMS LAWN SERVICE PERSONAL : BORN: JUNE 12 , 1956 HEIGHT: 5 ' 11" WEIGHT: 160 LBS . MARRIED : 2 CHILDREN INACTIVE MEMBER OF THE' KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY OF AMERICA. i • ‘ , , • ,. ir ,. . . C T 0 7 1988 i k ruff+.. t .;t,;r.1 .,,,„( ., liiiiiiimi Brenner-Morris Counseling Services . October 6 , 1988 Mrs . Nancy Israelson Board of County Commissioners County Government Complex Naples, Florida 33962 Dear Mrs . Israelson; - I would like to be considered for the position on the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Enclosed please find an abbreviated professional resume and a resume of community involvement. Both my home and office are located in Commission District 2 . As a single parent of a young son I find that I have a great interest and concern about our county parks and recreation ,.-- facilities . I believe that a good park system, such as we are now developing, is an essential component of a growing and healthy community. I would like to take an active role in influencing the future of this community. Thank you for your consideration. • S . . er e 1 .,.�..-- itue d , /4AG144<2,./ Beverly Brenner-Morris Home Address : 850 F - Meadowland Dr. Naples 33963 598-2119 C ... • 5051 Castello Drive • Suite 232 • Naples, Florida 33940 • (813) 434-2949 Mr and Mrs Andrew J. Hendricks 782 105th Ave N. Naples, FL 33963 813-597-4749 October 8, 1988 Nancy Israelson - Board of Collier County Commissioners 3301 U.S. 41 East i ; �vn Naples, FL 33962 Mrs . Israelson, Please find my enclosed presentation of qualifications to serve the Board of Collier County Comm- issioners on their Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. I 'm certain that you will find my lack of any conflicts of interest, my desire to serve the public, my committment to Collier County, and my youthful work habits and energy an assett that will fulfill your vacancy. Please do not hesitate 4' to contact me with any questions, during the day at 262-5599 or after hours at 597-4749 . Sincerely, encl. ,� 4' cc: ,,Z642tU Arnold Glass Anne Goodnight Andrew J. Hendricks Burt Saunders Max Hasse � I LAW OFFICES OF LIEBERFARB, TREISER, KOBZA 8c LEIGH C . CHARTERED 801 TWELFTH AVENUE SOUTH • 4TH FLOOR 4011111.6 NAPLES, FLORIDA 33940 TELEPHONE (810) 649-4900 HOLLY A�HARMON DAVID . ION r„ STANLEY J. LIEBERFARB TELEFAX 813/649-0823 ROGER E. CRAIG RICHARD M.TREISER Or COVRSEL e- -..-r 14, 1988 Collier County Board of Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail _ -`" 1"=s Building "F" , Third Floor Naples, Florida 33962 - Re: Appointment- District 2 Representative to the Collier County Parks & Recreation Planning Advisory Board Dear Commissioners: By this letter I would like to make formal application for appointment to the District 2 position open on the Collier County Parks & Recreation Planning Advisory Board. 04 Because of the obvious and explosive growth in Collier County during the past decade and as projected for the next several decades, I believe that the identification and proper use of our scarce natural resources is absolutely critical to the quality of life which is so important to all of us. In very few areas is proper utilization of •our resources so important as in the area of public parks and recreational facilities. I believe that I am uniquely qualified to fill the District 2 position, having had a tremendous wealth of experience in municipal law and land use planning at a professional level as well as a substantial amount of municipal experience working with elected officials and staff in over ten ( 10) municipalities. Enclosed with this letter you will find my qualifications as set forth in my resume. In addition to my professional and educational qualifications, and perhaps most importantly, I am concerned about the future of growth and planning in Collier County and the role that our public park and recreational facilities play in that growth. Further, I have always believed that one should give back to his or her community at least a part of what that community has provided to each person. . ROBERT B. NEUMAN 545 LAKE LOUISE CIRCLE NAPLES, FLORIDA 33940 October 3 , 1988 firs. Israelson 3301 U. S. 41 East Naples, Fl 33962 Dear Mrs. Israelson : Per our telephone conversation of this morning , pertaining to the position open on The Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. I would like to submit my name for consideration for the opening. As I told you it has been many years since I have written a resume . Regardless what happens I want you to know that I appreciate the time you gave to me explaining what was needed. Cordially , /7;7," Home telephone ..97-5409 NOW / 1 IMPACT FEES FOR PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REVIEW DRAFT OCTOBER 11 , 1988 _ a Henderson, Young & Company TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Overview 1 1 . Standards, Principles, Data and Analyses 7 2. Formulas Used to Develop Parks and Recreational Facilities Impact Fees 19 3. Calculation of Parks and Recreational Facilities Impact Fees 21 Appendix A: Maps of Community Parks Service Area Districts 27 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 : Standards of Service and Costs 14 Table 2: Standard Costs per Capita 21 Table 3: Net Park Costs per Capita Chargeable to Impact Fees 22 Table 4: Parks and Recreational Facilities Impact Fees . 23 Table 5: Forecast of Investment Value of Recreational Facilities 24 Table 6: Impact Fee Discounts and Rate Schedule 25 cQ 1988 by Henderson , Young & Company . Henderson , Young & Company authorizes Collier County , Florida, to duplicate and distribute this study for all governmental purposes, but such right does not extend to the duplication of this study by any party for private financial gain . Henderson , Young & Company expressly reserves the right to bring action for copyright infringement against any one who appropriates this study or any of its contents therein for personal gain . INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW This study of impact fees for parks and recreation facilities in Collier County , Florida presents the methodology that is used to develop the fees, summarizes the data that is the basis for the fees, and documents the calculation of the fees. The methodology is designed to comply with the requirements of court cases and statutes of the State of Florida. There are three significant court cases that guide the development of impact fees in Florida: Contractors and Builders Association of Pinellas County v . City of Dunedin . 329 So.2d 314 (Fla. 1976) ; Hollywood. Inc . v . Broward County , 431 So.2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) ; and Home Builders and Contractors Association of Palm Beach County , Inc . v . Board of County Commissioners of Palm Beach County . 446 So.2d 140 (Fla 4th DCA 1983) . The Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act also touches on some aspects of impact fees. Rules The court cases and legislation provide direction in three broad areas of the development of impact fees: ( 1 ) who pays, and how much ( the " fair share" rules) , (2) where and how the fee can be used ( the " nexus of benefit" rules) , and (3) offsets against the fee ( the " credits" rules) . The fair share rules provide that impact fees can be charged . only for the portion of the cost of public capital facilities that is attributable to new growth . Impact fees cannot be charged to REVIEW DRAFT 1 10-11-88 pay for the cost of reducing or eliminating deficiencies in existing facilities. Within this broad rule , specific guidance is given in several areas: it is permitted to distinguish among different types of growth in establishing fee amounts ( i .e . , residential , commercial , etc . ) ; fee-payers should be able to pay a smaller fee if they can demonstrate that their development will have less impact than is presumed in the fee schedule ; costs of facilities that will be used by new growth and existing users must be apportioned between the two groups in determining the amount and expenditure of the fee . The nexus of benefit rules require a reasonable connection ( 1 ) between the need for public capital facilities and the growth from the fee-paying development , and (2) between the expenditure of fee revenue and the benefits received by the fee-paying development . These two conditions limit where and when impact fees can be collected and used. Where possible , there should be a geographical relationship , but there is no specific limit on the distance between a fee-paying development and a public capital facility that is built with the impact fees. Furthermore , the fee revenue must be expended within a reasonable period of time , but there is no single maximum limit that applies to all impact fee expenditures. Explicit limitations on the expenditure of fees must be adequate to guide government _.personnel , and fee revenue nust__be_.__ ._:_ : earmarked for specific uses related to the public capital facilities. REVIEW DRAFT 2 10-11-88 The credits rules allow a fee-payer to have an impact fee reduced to reflect ( 1 ) contributions of land, cash , facilities, or other assets that meet the same need as the fee , and (2) future payments of taxes that would ordinarily be used for public capital facilities. The court cases and legislation do not prohibit the government from establishing reasonable constraints on determining credits. In particular , the government should require that the quality of a donated public facility should conform to adopted county standards for such facilities, or at least be comparable to similar county facilities. The government should also require a rational nexus of benefit between a contribution and the fee-paying property which receives a credit . Finally , the amount of any credit should not exceed the amount of the fee that is being offset by the credit . Overview There are two impact fees for parks and recreational facili- ties. The first is for " regional " parks that provide relatively undeveloped natural surroundings for passive activities, such as beaches for swimming, walking, and nature study , and active facilities that are regional in nature , such as olympic pools , track and field and gymnasium facilities. The other fee is for " community" parks that provide active recreational facilities, such as ballfields and racquet courts. There are no impact fees for " neighborhood" parks because land development regulations REVIEW DRAFT 3 10-11-88 require new development to provide such local parks and open space . Collier County' s impact fees for parks and recreational facilities are based on a standard of service that insures that all County residents, present and future , will receive an equal capital investment per person in County regional and community parks, and recreation facilities at those 'parks. The capital investment per person represents the current cost of a combination of park and recreation facilities, including land, ballfields, racquet courts, swimming, playgrounds, picnic tables, and other capital improvements. The County's standard for each facility is a local adaptation of the guidelines and standards of the Florida Department of Natural Resources, and the Florida Recreation and Parks Association . Collier County's standards for parks and recreation facilities are adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in the County's Comprehensive Plan , as approved August 1 , 1988, and any subsequent amendments. The County's Comprehensive Plan also contains a five-year list of capital improvements for parks and recreational facili- ties. The five-year lists of improvements provide the nexus between the standards of service and the actual improvements that are required to meet or exceed the standards. The impact fee calculations are based on current dollar cost ( i .e . , replacement value) of land acquisition , design , site preparation , landscaping and construction of park and recreation facilities. No costs of operation or maintenance of park REVIEW DRAFT 4 10-11-88 facilities or recreation programs are included in these impact fees. The costs of park and recreation improvements are calculated at 100% of cost ( there is no " discounting" to a percentage of need, as has been done in some other impact fee systems) . The County has a responsibility to identify and eliminate any deficiency of current service compared to the standard of service, because there is no justification for charging new growth for a higher level of service than is provided to the current population . In a standards-driven impact fee , however , there is no allocation of costs among current deficiency , growth , and excess capacity because the fee amount represents a standard, rather than actual improvements. Collier County fulfills its responsibility to eliminate any current deficiency by using the annual review of the capital improvements element of its Comprehensive Plan to compare its standard of service to the current population , and to finance a program of improvements that eliminate current deficiencies, if any . An implementation phasing schedule at the conclusion of this study discounts the standards- driven impact fee to match the County's levels of service pursuant to the projects contained in the Comprehensive Plan . There are three factors that determine the nexus of benefits for impact fees: ( 1 ) residential versus non-residential benefits, (2) municipal and unincorporated benefits, and (3) county-wide service area versus district service areas. REVIEW DRAFT 5 10-11-88 The County park system is used, for the most part , by individuals rather than businesses or other non-residential land uses, therefore the County's impact fees for parks and recreational facilities are charged only to residential development . Community parks are provided by local governments for the primary use of residents in the areas adjacent to such parks. City governments provide such parks to municipal residents, and the County provides community parks for residents of the unincorporated area. As a result , the County's impact fees for community parks are charged only to development in the unincorporated areas of the County . Regional parks are designed to serve all residents of the County , including residents of municipalities, therefore the County's regional park impact fees are charged to all residential development in the County , including residential development within municipal boundaries. According to the County's Comprehensive Plan , a community park serves an area up to 3 miles from the park , and a population of up to 25,000 people , therefore impact fees for community parks are collected and expended in districts that correspond to the service area of each community park . Regional parks serve areas up to 60 miles from the park . Since the entire County is less than 60 miles across, all regional . parks serve the entire County , therefore a single county-wide REVIEW DRAFT 6 10-11-88 district is used to collect and expend county-wide impact fees for regional parks. Organization of the Report The first chapter of this report describes the service level standards, cost-benefit principles, data and analyses that form the foundation of the recommended impact fees. Chapter two provides the formulas that are used to calculate the impact fees. The third chapter presents the calculations and resulting recommended impact fees for parks and recreational facilities in Collier County . REVIEW DRAFT 7 10-11-88 1 , STANDARDS. PRINCIPLES. DATA AND ANALYSES This chapter presents the standards for levels of service , cost-benefit principles, cost and demographic data, and analyses that are needed to calculate impact fees for parks and recreation facilities. In particular , this chapter of the study : A. Defines the types of parks for which impact fees are charged, B. Establishes the County's responsibilty within the network of federal , state , County , municipal and private parks in Collier County , C. Presents the nexus between payment of impact fees and benefits received by the fee-paying development , D. Summarizes the methodology of developing impact fees for parks and recreation facilities. E. Indicates the standards of service and cost standards for County parks and recreation facilities, F. Analyzes credits for future tax payments, G. Summarizes socio-economic data regarding persons per house- hold, and H. Discusses the effect of impact fees on affordable housing. The formulas and calculations of the parks and recreation facilities impact fees will be presented in Chapters 3 and 4 , respectively . A . Types of Parks Parks are usually categorized by purpose or use , service area and, occasionally , size . Collier County uses a classification system adapted from Outdoor Recreation in Florida - 1987 by the . Department of Natural Resources, and Recreation , Park and Open Space Standards and Guidelines by the National Recreation and REVIEW DRAFT 8 10-11-88 Parks Association . The County's classification system consists of three main types of parks: regional parks, community parks, and neighborhood parks. The following definitions are excerpts from the County's Comprehensive Plan : Regional parks are " designed to serve an area with a service radius of about 60 miles; serving multi-planning areas. " Community parks are "designed to serve an area with a service radius of about three miles; serving a population of about 25,000 people. " Neighborhood parks are "designed to serve an area with a service radius of about one-and-a-half miles; serving a population of about 1 ,000 persons. " The County's inventory of parks designates "beach/water" parks in lieu of " regional " parks. The inventory also includes boat ramps and special facilities ( i .e . , County Center , and Racquet Club) . Recreation facilities are not separately defined, but the following recreation facilities are included as cost components of parks based on standards for levels of service adopted in the Comprehensive Plan . The facilities are associated with a specific type of park , as indicated below: Regional Park Facilities amphitheater gymnasium olympic pool track & field boat ramps Community Park Facilities baseball fields • basketball/volleyball bicycle trails children' s playgrounds community centers community pools REVIEW DRAFT 9 10-11-88 Community Park Facilities (continued) fitness station trails football soccer fields jogging trails picnic pavilions racquetball courts • shuffleboard courts softball fields tennis courts B. Responsibility for Parks There is a substantial network of parks and recreation facil - ities in Collier County , including federal , state , county , municipal and private facilities. Since impact fees are used only for capital costs, Collier County's responsibility for the capital costs of the park system is as follows: Collier County is legally and financially responsible for the capital costs of County regional and community parks, therefore this study of growth's impact on parks includes the County's existing and planned regional and community parks. The existing County parks include 7 regional beach/water parks and 5 community parks: Regional Beach/Water Parks Community Parks Tigertail Beach North Naples Community Park Horizon Way Golden Gate Community Park Clam Pass Park Immokalee Community Park South Collier Boulevard East Naples Community Park Beach Access Frank E. Mackie , Jr . Community North Gulfshore Park (Marco Island) Beach Access Lely Barefoot Beach Vanderbilt Beach The County requires developers to provide for the capital costs of neighborhood parks and/or open space in the unincorp- orated areas of the County , therefore those local parks and REVIEW DRAFT 10 10-11-88 recreation facilities are excluded from the analysis of County park impact fees. The County is not responsible for the capital costs of Federal , State , municipal or private parks or recreation facilities, therefore such facilities are excluded from the analysis of County park impact fees. C. Nexus of Benefit There are three issues that affect the nexus of benefits for park impact fees: ( 1 ) the type of property that receives the benefits (residential or non-residential ) , (2) the location of the property in a municipality or in the unincorporated areas of the County , and (3) the proximity of the development to the various types of park and recreation facilities (county-wide service area versus service area districts) . 1 . Type of Property Receiving Benefit The County park system is used, for the most part , by indi - viduals rather than businesses or other non-residential land uses, therefore the County's park impact fee is charged only to residential development . 2. Government Providing Parks to Benefitting Property Regional parks are designed to serve all residents of the County , whether they live in municipal or unincorporated areas. As a result , the County's regional park impact fees are charged to all residential development in the County , including residential development within municipal boundaries. REVIEW DRAFT 11 10-11-88 Community parks are provided by local governments for the primary use of residents in the areas adjacent to such parks. City governments provide community parks to municipal residents, and the County provides community parks for residents of the unincorporated area. As a result , the County's impact fees for community parks are charged only to development in the unincorporated areas of the County . 3. Proximity of Parks to Benefitting Property According to the County's Comprehensive Plan , a community park serves an area up to 3 miles from the park , and a population of up to 25,000 people , therefore impact fees for community parks are collected and expended in districts that correspond to the service area of each community park . Appendix A contains maps of } (:) the impact fee districts for community parks. Regional parks serve areas up to 60 miles from the park . Since the entire County is less than 60 miles across, all regional parks serve the entire County , therefore a single county-wide district is used to collect and expend county-wide impact fees for regional parks. D. Methodology for Developing Impact Fees for Parks and Recreation Facilities The impact fees for parks and recreation facilities are based on standards of service and cost . Each standard of service < i .e . , acres of park per 1 ,000 population , number of tennis courts per 1 ,000 population , etc . ) is multiplied by the standard cost of the land or facility , and the result is divided by 1 ,000 to establish REVIEW DRAFT 12 10-11-88 the capital cost per person . The capital cost per person is then multiplied by the average number of persons that occupy residential dwelling units, thus calculating the impact fee cost per dwelling unit . The use of standards to calculate the impact fee insures that all residents, both present and future, will be treated equitably in receiving the same capital investment in parks and recreation facilities. The use of standards provides objectivity and equity in determining the overall need for County parks and recreation facilities. The standards are achieved and maintained by making improve- ments that add park facilities as growth takes place , thus continuously maintaining the ratio of facilities to population that is required by the standard. The Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Develop- ment Regulation Act (Chapter 163, Florida Statutes) requires the County's Comprehensive Plan to list financially feasible capital improvements projects that will be built concurrent with growth . The lists must cover a period of not less than 5 years and be updated annually . Since these lists constitute the "official " park improvements program (adopted by ordinance) , and such lists are based on the same standards of service as those used to develop the park impact fees, it is reasonable to limit the expenditure of parks and recreation facility impact fees to the projects listed in the Comprehensive Plan . REVIEW DRAFT 13 10-11-88 E, Standards for Levels of Service and Costs Collier County's park impact fees are designed to maintain standards for levels of service for parks and recreation facilities for present and future residents of the County . The standards are measured in current dollars of capital investments per person . There are two elements that are combined to calculate the investment amounts: ( 1 ) the standard quantity of park land and recreation facilities per 1 ,000 population , and (2) the standard cost of park land and recreation facilities (see Table 1 ) . TABLE 1 STANDARDS OF SERVICE AND COSTS Standard Standard Per 1 ,000 Cost Per Component Population Facility Regional Park (acres) 2.9412 $ 10 ,000 Amphitheater 0 .0118 100 ,000 Gymnasiums 0 .0059 910 ,000 Olympic pool 0 .0059 1 ,564,000 Track & fieId 0 .0059 191 ,520 Boat ramps 0 . 1646 180 ,262 Community Park (acres) 1 .2882 24,000 Baseball fields 0 .0353 346,500 Basketball/Volleyball 0 . 1765 17,500 Bicycle trails (miles) 0 .0553 50 , 160 Children's playground 0 . 1059 22,500 Community centers 0 .0353 610 ,000 Community pool 0 .0059 450 ,000 Fitness station trails 0 .0353 50 ,000 Football/Soccer fields 0 .0353 225,500 Jogging trails (miles) 0 .0353 26,400 Picnic pavilions 0 .0706 28,000 Racquetball courts 0 . 1412 20 ,000 Shuffleboard courts 0 .0706 7,700 Softball fields 0 .0706 192,500 Tennis courts 0 .0706 18,750 REVIEW DRAFT 14 10-11-88 r I Table 1 lists the components of land and facilities that make up the County's regional and community park system. For each component , the Table displays the County's standard of service per 1 ,000 population , and the standard cost of one unit of each component . The standards for the quantity of park land and recreation facilities per 1 ,000 population is taken from the County's Comprehensive Plan , dated August 1 , 1988. The standards in the Plan are adapted from guidelines recommended by the Florida Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the Florida Recreation and Parks Association (FRPA) . The adaptations are necessary to adjust the DNR and FRPA guidelines to conform to County policies and financial capabilities. The cost of park land and recreation facilities was provided by the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department . There are two reasons for converting these standards of land and facilities to dollars of replacement cost investment per capita. First , dollar standards are easier to use and understand. For example , the dollar cost is readily converted to the impact fee cost , and both numbers can be revised easily during annual reviews and updates of the Comprehensive Plan and the impact fee study . Another convenience of using dollars to measure the standard is the fact that dollars allow direct comparison of facilities that are otherwise difficult to compare ( i .e . , comparing tennis courts to softball fields) . REVIEW DRAFT 15 10-11-88 The second reason for using dollars to measure the standard is the flexibility it permits in determining the precise mix of facilities that the County builds to meet the needs of its residents. If the standard were the number of facilities, the County would be obliged to build each facility , even if residents indicate a preference for a different facility . By using dollars as the standard, the County can exchange one- type of facility for another ( i .e . , build 11 basketball courts instead of 1 softball field) as long as the total investment per capita attains the required level of dollars per capita. A standard measured in dollars requires the County to make an equitable investment per capita, and it avoids the problem of building unwanted facilities. F. Credits for Other Revenue Sources The County must give credit to new development for future taxes or other monies development will pay that will be used for expansion of the County's park system. The only revenue sources that are required to be credited are those which are used for park improvements as a matter of County policy . Collier County' s only relevant policy regarding specific revenues for park improvements is the requirement that grants from the Florida Boating Improvement Program (DIP) be used for waterway maintenance and improvements, and boater facilities, as required by Chapter 371 , Florida Statutes. The County's recent expenditures for capital improvements from ad valorem taxes is not the basis for an impact fee credit because it is a tax on current residents REVIEW DRAFT 16 10-11-88 for financing existing deficiencies in public facilities, including parks. The other potential " credits" against impact fees are dona- tions by developers of land or improvements for regional or community parks, and donations of municipal impact fees by city governments. Those credits depend upon specific arrangements between the County and a developer or a city , and are calculated on a case by case basis at the time impact fees are to be paid. G. Persons per Household The average number of persons per household in the County is an important element in Collier County's impact fees. The impact fee is based on capital investment dollars per capita, but it is charged to dwelling units. A typical dwelling unit houses more than one person , so the average number of persons per household is used to establish the relationship between the investment per capita and the dwelling unit . The connection is made by multiplying the average persons per household times the investment per capita to compute the impact fee per household (dwelling unit ) . According to the County Growth Management Department , there is an average of 2.59 persons per household in all of Collier County , and 2.67 persons per household in the unincorporated area of the County . H. Affordable Housing A fundamental premise of impact fees is that growth should pay for its fair share of the public facilities that it needs. One REVIEW DRAFT 17 10-11-88 potential drawback to impact fees paid by residential development is the potential negative affect of the fees on the affordability of housing. This concern has little import for housing which is of moderate or higher price . Such houses will not be significantly affected by impact fees because the impact fees recommended in this study would be less than 1/2 of 1% of the cost of an average home . Low income housing, however , may be more directly affected. Any given impact fee will be a larger percentage of the cost of a low priced home , and the inelasticity of income of buyers of low cost housing may cause some to be priced out of the market if relief is not provided. There are two mechanisms for providing relief from impact fees for low cost housing: exemptions or rebates. An exemption leaves the County with unfunded portions of its needed park improvements. A better approach involves rebating the impact fee on low cost housing from the same revenue sources that the County uses for low-income housing programs. Such rebates serve the same purpose as other low-income housing programs. Rebates maintain the principle that growth must pay for its public facilities while honoring County policy supporting low cost housing for low-income persons. REVIEW DRAFT 18 10-11-88 2. FORMULAS USED TO DEVELOP PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES IMPACT FEES Collier County's park impact fees are calculated using a three step process, each of which uses a formula. Each step and formula is applied separately to regional and community parks. This chapter of the study describes each step and formula, beginning with ( 1 ) calculation of the standard cost per capita of each type of park land or facility , (2) adjustment of standard costs per capita for credits for payment of other revenues for the same capital costs, and ending with (3) computation of specific impact fees per dwelling unit for regional and community parks. 1 . Parks and Recreation Facilities Cost per Capita The cost per capita of each type of park land or facility is determined by multiplying the standard quantity of the facility per 1 ,000 population by the standard cost per facility , and dividing the result by 1 ,000 : Standard per X Standard Cost 1 ,000 Population per Facility = Standard Cost 1 ,000 per Capita 2. Adjustment for Credits for Future Tax Payments The standard park cost per capita is reduced by the amount of the credit per capita to determine the net cost per capita that is chargeable to impact fees: Standard Cost - Credit per Capita = Impact Fee Cost per Capita per Capita REVIEW DRAFT 19 10-11-88 3. Calculation of Impact Fee The impact fee is calculated by multiplying the net impact fee cost per capita times the number of persons per household in order to determine the impact fee cost per household (dwelling unit ) : Impact Fee Cost X Persons per = Impact Fee per per Capita Household Dwelling Unit The three formulas described above are used in the next Chapter of the study to calculate the park impact fees for Collier County . REVIEW DRAFT 20 10-11-88 3 . CALCULATION OF PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEES This chapter of the study contains the calculations of impact fees. Table 2 presents the standard cost per capita for park land and recreation facilities, using formula 1 from the preceding chapter . TABLE 2 STANDARDS OF SERVICE AND COSTS AND COSTS PER CAPITA Standard Standard Standard Per 1 ,000 Cost Per Cost Per Component Population Facility Capita Regional Park (acres) 2.9412 $ 10 ,000 29.41 Amphitheater 0 .0118 100 ,000 1 . 18 Gymnasiums 0 .0059 910 ,000 5.37 Olympic pool 0 .0059 1 ,564 ,000 9.23 Track & field 0 .0059 191 ,520 1 . 13 Boat ramps 0 . 1646 180 ,262 29. 67 Subtotal : Facilities 46 ,58 Total : Regional Parks 75.99 Community Park (acres) 1 .2882 24,000 30 .92 Baseball fields 0 .0353 346,500 12.23 Basketball/Volleyball 0 . 1765 17,500 3.89 Bicycle trails (miles) 0 .0553 50 , 160 2.77 Children's playground 0 . 1059 22,500 2.38 Community centers 0 .0353 610 ,000 21 .53 Community pool 0 .0059 450 ,000 2.66 Fitness station trails 0 .0353 50 ,000 1 . 77 Football/Soccer fields 0 .0353 225,500 7.96 Jogging trails (miles) 0 .0353 26,400 .93 Picnic pavilions 0 .0706 28,000 1 .98 Racquetball courts 0 . 1412 20 ,000 2. 82 Shuffleboard courts 0 .0706 7,700 .54 Softball fields 0 .0706 192,500 13.59 Tennis courts 0 .0706 18,750 1 .32 Subtotal : Facilities 76 . 37 Total : Community Parks 107 .29 REVIEW DRAFT 21 10-11-88 For the purpose of calculating impact fees, each type of recreational facility is associated with a specific type of park , therefore the cost per capita of a type of park is the sum of the costs per capita of recreation facilities and park land for that type of park . Step two in determining impact fees reduces the standard cost per capita by the amount of credit per capita for future payments of other revenue that is used for the same capital projects. Table 3 presents the standard cost per capita ( from Table 2) , the credit per capita, and the resulting per capita cost that is chargeable to impact fees. Since no credits are necessary at this time (see page 16) , Table 3 is included for illustrative purposes to indicate the manner in which such credits are applied in the event that credits are warranted as a result of future County actions. TABLE 3 NET PARK COSTS PER CAPITA CHARGEABLE TO IMPACT FEES Standard Impact Fee Cost per Credit Cost per Type of Park Capita per Capita Capita Regional Parks $ 75.99 $ 0 $ 75.99 Community Parks and Facilities 107.29 0 107.29 The final step in calculating park impact fees is to convert the impact fee cost per capita ( from Table 3) to a cost per REVIEW DRAFT 22 10-11-88 dwelling unit by multiplying the impact fee cost per capita by the average number of persons per household (discussed at page 17) . Regional parks serve the entire County , therefore the persons per household factor is for the whole County . Community parks serve only the unincorporated area, therefore the persons per household factor is for only the unincorporated area. These calculations are presented in Table 4. TABLE 4 PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEES Impact Fee Cost per Persons per Impact Fee per Type of Park Capita Household Dwelling Unit Regional Parks $ 75.99 2.67 $202.89 Community Parks and Facilities 107. 29 2.59 277. 88 The County has not yet achieved the adopted standards for levels of service for recreational facilities. Until the adopted standards are achieved, the County will charge impact fees based on the actual level of service of such facilities. Table 5 lists the investment value of recreational facilities for Collier County for the next six years. REVIEW DRAFT 23 10-11-88 TABLE 5 FORECAST OF INVESTMENT VALUE OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 REGIONAL PARKS Ampitheater $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Gymnasium 910,000 910,000 910,000 910,000 910,000 910,000 Olympic Pools 0 0 0 0 0 1,564,000 Track & Field 0 0 0 0 0 191,520 Boat Ramps 1,982,882 2,343,406 2,703,930 3,064,454 3,424,978 3,785,502 Total $2,992,882 $ 3,453,406 $ 3,813,930 $ 4,174,454 $ 4,534,978 $ 6,651,022 County Population 146,862 154,050 160,950 167,850 174,750 181,650 Per Capita $ 20 $ 22 $ 24 $ 25 $ 26 $ 37 COMMUNITY PARKS Baseball Fields $ 693,000 $ 1,039,500 $ 1,386,200 $ 2,079,000 $ 2,425,500 $ 2,772,000 Basketball/Volleyball 280,000 280,000 280,000 280,000 525,000 525,000 Bicycle Trails 190,608 471,504 471,504 471,504 471,504 471,504 Childrens Playgrounds 360,800 360,800 360,800 360,800 451,000 451,000 Community Centers 1,220,000 2,440,000 3,660,000 3,660,000 4,270,000 4,270,000 Community Pools 0 0 0 0 450,000 450,000 Fitness Trails 0 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 Football/Soccer Fields 902,000 902,000 902,000 902,000 1,578,500 1,578,500 Jogging Trails 26,400 26,400 26,400 52,800 79,200 105,600 Picnic Pavilions 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 336,000 336,000 Racquetball Courts 320,000 320,000 320,000 320,000 480,000 480,000 Shuffleboard Courts 115,500 115,500 115,500 115,500 130,900 130,900 Softball Fields 3,465,000 3,465,000 3,465,000 3,465,000 3,465,000 3,465,000 Tennis Courts 562,500 562,500 562,500 562,500 637,500 637,500 Total $8,163,808 $10,011,204 $11,577,904 $12,297,104 $15,600,104 $15,973,004 Unincorp Population 126,770 133,757 140,454 147,150 153,842 160,533 Per Capita $ 64 $ 75 $ 82 $ 84 $ 101 $ 99 The difference between the projected investment per capita, shown in Table 5, and the adopted standard, listed in Table 2, can be used to develop a discount rate from the full -cost impact fee . For example , the regional park facility investment in 1988-89 is $20 per capita (see Table 5) . The adopted standard for recrea- tional facilities at regional parks is $46.58 (see Table 2) , REVIEW DRAFT 24 10-11-88 therefore the actual level of service is 43% of the adopted standard. As a result , the impact fee for regional parks will be discounted in 1988-89 to 43% of the portion of the impact fee that is attributable to facilities, a discount of 57%. The facilities portion of the impact fee for regional parks is listed in Table 2: $46.58 of the total $75.99. In other words, 61% of the impact fee for regional parks is for recreational facilities, and that portion will be discounted 57% in 1988-89, producing a net discount of 35% (57% of 61%) . Table 6 lists the discount rates and the resulting impact fee rates for regional and community parks for each year through 1993-94. TABLE 6 IMPACT FEE DISCOUNTS AND RATE SCHEDULE Regional Parks Community Parks Net Impact Fees Discount Impact Discount Impact Unincorp . Year Rate Fee Rate Fee Cities Area 1988-89 35% $132 12% $245 $132 $377 1989-90 ' 32% 138 1% 275 138 413 1990-91 29% 144 none 278 144 422 1991-92 28% 146 none 278 146 424 1992-93 27% 148 none 278 148 426 1993-94 13% 176 none 278 176 454 Undiscounted 203 278 203 481 REVIEW DRAFT 25 10-11-88 The park impact fees listed in Table 4 are to be charged to all new single-family and multi-family residential dwelling units according to the rate schedule listed in Table 6. Regional park impact fees are collected and expended on a county-wide basis; community park impact fees are collected and expended in districts, shown in Appendix A. REVIEW DRAFT 26 10-11-88 APPENDIX A IMPACT FEE DISTRICTS FOR COMMUNITY PARKS The following maps show the approximate area to be served by each community park . Actual district boundaries should conform to legal and natural boundaries that can be used in legal descrip- tions. The following descriptions summarize , the main portions of each community park impact fee district . All districts are based on a 3 mile radius from the community park in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan . Community park impact fees paid by development in a district must be expended on community parks in the same district . Districts 2, 7, 8 and 10 are exempt from Community Park Impact Fees. 1 . North Naples Community Park District A. All of North Naples PCA* (except southern tier of sections on Pine Ridge Road) 2. Central Community Park District A. West of Airport Pulling (CR31 ) 3. Golden Gate Community Park District A. All of Golden Gate PCA except N.E. corner B. Central Naples PCA, east of Airport Pulling (CR 31 ) C. South Naples PCA, nothern sections 7, 8, 9, 10 , (3?) 4. East Naples Community Park District A. All of East Naples PCA B. Marco PA , north of Rookery Bay 5. South Naples Community Park District A. All of South Naples PCA , except northern sections 7 , 8, 9, 10 , (3?) which could be assigned to Golden Gate • B. Royal Fakapalm PCA , western 1 mile , north of US 41 to Rattlesnake Hammock *PCA = Planning Community Area REVIEW DRAFT 27 10-11-88 6. March Community Park District (Frank E. Mackie , Jr . Park) A. Portion of Marco PCA within 3 mile radius of Mackie Park B. Royal Fakapalm PCA, S.W. point and area approximately 1 mile in from the S.W. point 7. Royal Fakapalm Community Park District A. All of Royal Fakapalm PCA except portions assigned to Districts 5 and 6, as described above 8. Rural Estates Community Park District A. All of Rural Estates PCA 9. Urban Estates Community Park District A. All of Urban Estates PCA, south of Immokalee Road 10 . Corkscrew Community Park District A. All of Corkscrew PCA except portions assigned to District 11 , as described below 11 . Immokalee Community Park District A . All of Immokalee PCA, except western panhandle sections B. Corkscrew PCA, portions within 3 mile radius of Immokalee Community Park ( 1 section wide to N. , NE. & S. ) REVIEW DRAFT 28 10-11-88 MAP P-1 l PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES 1 NORTH NAPLES PLANNING COMMUNITY AREA Collier County. Florida �— SR. 666 6 4 6 . • • v 2. LEE CO. COWER CO. ,-' r H n 1 I 17 .7 111 1• 17 • - . C.R. 860 WICCRIS PASS s a a a 1A S NAPLES I 0 PARK ' C4tit}h ELEuENTARY IuuOKALEE P . (S.R. 8.uf1 S.R. 846 i ... NORTH NAPLES NO T NAPLES' t . COMMUNITY PARK ?_ ,,t.-.. ,� +CCUM NIrr PARK >. 1. 6 27 is DISTRICT- > 0• 11 a 4 < F C;R. 882 oq_ a a7 s. y a y PELICAN BAY - J- 1. PROPERTY • y • GULF OF MEXICO �� ' . q --'rte y I LEGEND I • i t�,} REGIONAL PARK 'S n 13 ® COUMUNITY PARK PINE RIOOE ROAD C.R. 896 • NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ■ • BEACH ACCESS N . BOAT RAUP r Q SCHOOL SITE a .4 n • ♦ SPECIAL PURPOSE PARK vI i cf II UNDEVELOPED PARK 511E `+- SCALE ` ` 1 T PREPARED 0Y COWER COUNTY CCuuuMTY CE'.ELCP1ENT CMSCH 11/87 ill£: P-1.DM3 0 1),II. VAL . 2q MAP P-7 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES c CENTRAL NAPLES PLANNING COMMUNITY AREA Collier County, Florida WI SEAGATE ELEMENTARY ,,,rw-` SCHOOL PINE RIDGE ROM(C.R. Baal ' C.R. 896 0 t• u II u 1.": /77.' n' 1- • 4 i . 0 p c z Y 0 P% j A 17 U • PIONCIANA Z PARK • C POINCIANA ❑ ELEMENTARY ...44 scHOOL GOLDEN GATE U COMUUNITY 'ARK DISTRICT T1 COL,AN GATE PARKWAY(C.R. 584) • C A 2. 1 A HA/l.3 I, RADIO R0.(C.R. 658) AIRPORT I) N V A ti l r__- LEGEND OAS ECM.(SR 84) * REGIONAL PARK N ';, Q CCUUNITY PARK � PREPARED BY MUER COUNTY CCUUUNITY DEvELCPUENT 0I1.490N 11/87 FILL • NEIGHBORHOOD PARK P-7.042 • BEACH ACCESS O BOAT RAUP ❑ SCHOOL SITE ♦ SPECIAL PURPOSE PARK r \........ Il UNDEVELOPED PARK SITE SCALE 1 1 r 0 1 MI. 27.41. 30 • , MAP P-5 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES GOLDEN GATE PLANNING COMMUNITY AREA Collier County, Florida yf�" ''''''''''''t-r, i GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY PARK DISTRICT l .„e. • I ❑COIDEN CATS � "y, ' R�, ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AARON ” Q LUTZ •kk... ....\I r_ •PARK 111 •% ` GOLDEN CATE = * COMMUNITY CENTER• (C.R• ) 1• Qt¢ qy1�� n \ r d� v NIL dr • _- I \ . I 1 , I 7r, :. • GOLDEN GATE •• y C 0 COMMUNITY PARK 61's ' if u PALM SPRINGS NEIGHS RHOOD PARK j RADIO ROAD MR. 656) n S.R. 64 i .. • .l y1 i- . 0 S 4 LEGEND 1` Q REGIONAL PARK /y. N ;A\ Q COMMUNITY PARK A DAVIS 3 O. EXT.(SR 34) • NEIGHBORHOOD PARK I. Np �� • BEACH ACCESS 6 BOAT RAMP ❑ SCHOOL. SITE '.1, + SPECIAL PURPOSE PARK k:)., N UNDEVELOPED PARK SITE T 2;104v17-.-- ' ` SCALE • �� rT,�4u.cu,.A..t^•..,•••,v,,;aw.: 0 )M1. 2111. PREPARED RY COWER COWRY CCAIAILINITY am:Li:PYENT DINSCM 1t/87 FU: P—&DMO • IAAP P-2 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES EAST NAPLES PLANNING COMMUNITY AREA \--' Collier County, Florida NAPLES S.R. asa A. 4 -''AIRPORT U ' COCONUT CR • ,,, I • g N BORN ROCK HARBOR PARK N, , OOH M S BL . (S.R. at) I S.R. 84 \\\\\\ • g SHAOOWIAYM CI / ELJ.IENTARY SCHOOL H a 7 COLLIER COUNTY + GOVERNMENT CENTER EAST NAPLES ;' .COMMUNITY PARK DISTRICT kI 1,r "PA IS I t• `� a • �J 3 7< d o RHc*ASStad ceNt .. I, C,R. MN / . Q EAST NAPLES COMMUNITY PARK G D N q i l 1 LEGEND i C. to REGIONAL PARK N Q COMMUNITY PARK is 0 NEIGHBCRH000 PARK I • BEACH ACCESS ta BOAT RAMP ❑ SCHOOL SITE , ' j + SPECIAL PURPOSE PARK ` r 't 111111 III UNDEVELOPED PARK SITE %' ...__, SCALE 1. 0 1 All. f. 21.41. PREPARED UJ BY CoER COURTY.CONSNW DI TY OEVELCPYT dNSICH •11/e7 t i �---... . „ . 32 ..-. ,� MAP P-9 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES SOUTH NAPLES PLANNING COMMUNITY AREA Collier County, Florida \,__' f SR e♦ ,�� GO DE4 GATE COMMUNITY PARK DISTRICT ° ,'%` 4 • • f• 9,''} • . m,. i......„...,.....7—.........„.„.....„,. ... ., u o u u "N .., / s RATTLESNAKE H HOCK ROAD i' i A 1 C SO TH NAPLES C MMUNITY PAR DISTRICT Q i 1 Q PROPOSU ED LAT1ON • COMUNITY LOPARK A Ia s E/ o ; \ - vi f f as a os .,--, • ' • 11.... •, « «_ Y n LEGEND I '+ "--.. ..—+••• 0 MANATEE ROAD PROPERTY If {} REGIONAL PARK N S ® COMMUNITY PARK • I a • NOCHBCRHOCD PARK • BEACH ACCESS O BOAT RAMP 8 ❑ SCHOOL STE ♦ SPECIAL PURPOSE PARK II SCALE T 6 1M1• 23.41. • UNDEVELOPED PARK SITE PREPARED BY COWER COUNTY CCUHIJNITY DEMLCPHENT OCASION 11/87 FILE: P-9-05W 33 . f • MAP P-8 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES �, MARCO PLANNING COMMUNITY AREA Collier County, Florida e,4.4, / EAST NAPLES m COMMUNITY P •Ia D I ST' >w i I a GULF or LEOCO a 1S 'S 4 T*/ . • m n • s t s a C,..---,. IP ISLE OF CAPRI LOTS BIMI. • .11/ — 71,8+0 MARCO PASS Ahab. �-� CUUr OF LEACo 1E61 PI.L1{4ER PARK � � h 0 MILLIE BARFIELD ELfLENTARY=HOP. ■ C.R. 92 V COLL'ER COUNTY RACQUET CLUB .;„... 17 + MARK I 1 OM '! T'(. . FRANK G HACKLE CWHUNTY PARK • P. • , S�_�y ; MWTERBERRY PARK r m LEGEND I GAULBA5 PASS =ice ' {} REGIONAL PARK , m N Q COULIUNITY PARK 4) NEIGHBORHOOD PARK • BEACH ACCESS o BOAT RAMP • ❑ SCHOOL•SITE ♦ SPECIAL PURPOSE PARK NW) '� I♦ UNDEVELOPED PARK STE T ii* . SCALE 1 L I CAPE ROHANO 0 11.11. V.41. PREPARED By COWER COUNTY COHuUNTY CE43.CPHENT DM9ON 11/67 ME: P—&DV, -,I. • MPP P-3 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES ROYAL FAKAPALM PLANNING COMMUNITY AREA Collier County, Florida ..... C.R. Ma 410"" • C-R. 84a J CL*cu.PARK• \ . w C t I.-7S S.R. 64 ALLIGATOR ALLEY(S.R• E4) \ • \ . SOUTH t °NAPL'ES e. -COMMUNITY " ,, PARK ,ISTRICT 71 /' N S n 64. mommii 11 01 a qT t 4r. eJ U eh MARCO COMMUNITY • PARK DISTRICT /S'�r5!^ zs .../sex ... .,„ . • - 6 ,t a _ liGe40 O CCMIAUNITY PARK 0 'e • F ,/ CITY NAnoNAL • �►—` r ` PAxx NEIGHBORHOOD PARK N `^�/ • BEACH ACCESS WV or uEb� Q ,-, 'girl •o BOAT RA/AP cause C2) Z`Tj' Vf. YONROE co. W O 111•0 iii ❑ SCHOOL SITE cio .1 _ -I• SPECIAL PURPOSE PARK c GQ� ~f y 0 UNDEVELOPED PARK SITE SCALE V. . 4 C y T 0 lAl. 21.11. PREPARED I Y COUJER COUNTY COULUwTY C.E E7.OPUENT DIM SI CN II/e7 FILL: P-3A443 55 . . • . • • - z- 36 MAP P-11 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES I URBAN ESTATES PLANNING COMMUNITY AREA Collier County. Florida i \ i I LEGEND t• REGIONAL PARK N C) CONNUNITY PARK 41 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK • BEACH ACCESS n O BOAT RAMP 1 ❑ SCHOOL SITE • 1 ♦ SPECIAL PURPOSE PARK RS UNOEVELOPED PARK 537E T a SCALE 1 1 1MI. 2141. � lam.„.... ,„+f$ I \ Iuu01CALEE R0. (G4:_848) • ... C.R. 848 URBAN ESTATES COMMUNITY PARK IISTRICT .. y ° 4 si NI W \\ 4 PROPOSED CODUUwTY PARK o 1 m O y} / 11 f 1 1 11 C.R. 896 %...,___, J i n Z PREPARED BY CcWER COUNTY CODUUNITY OrvELOPUENT DMSICN 7/88 FILE: P-11.13' 37 • MAP P-10 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES \...___., CORKSCREW PLANNING COMMUNITY AREA Collier County, Fonda HENDRY CO. , COLLIER CO. aR tz • ca CORKSCREW o COMML7W I TY PARK DISTP CT W w ] ca. eoo .\\ . 0 0 TR FORD IMMOKALEE C.R. 44a 0 0 5-3 A W O: • O Q W GR. eb /� U PROPOSED LOCATION/,C. • REC1ONAL PARK V LEE CO. , A COLLIER CO.= CR. e:a r OR. ese • �y C.R. eS8 .. / C.R. EH 4......-•••01 • • ffi BIG J CYPRESS R NATIONAL t PRESERVE ti iti• w 1r SR. e♦ ALUCATOR ALLEY S.R. e+ 1 LEGEND N t} REGIONAL PARK o COMUUNITY PARK • NEIGHBORHOOD PARK • BEACH ACCESS A BOAT RAMP e S ❑ SCHOOL SITE + SPECIAL PURPOSE PARK , NI UNDEVELOPED PARK SITE SCALE t i 0 . 11.41. 2M1. • PREPARED BY COLLIER COUNTY COUMUNITY DEKICPUENT°PASON. 11/57 FILL P.-lama lk • e O J-14 8 ii/ ihil 1 i . 0y i D . a , ,,, _ 2 W 0Vp� 3 -� C N��„ Y Q"1'Lr = 0 cc I- V • g cc F- Ol W9 1r2 8 \ fl Q1 . 6'Z O .. 0 o Q8c- � Wes , •Wz U U nJ.W V ©Y � _ I zsW 3 8 W w a p T ZZ vs O J 0 = a - i I • E) w J O ( 1 lr Y \\:\:.:„...„ ' �+'r Y . & .f 0_ ) ! 4 - - _ , j"" N Y H Ycr amoo■orreeeeooteeiedi <EL N <cc Y Y 0 n . oa o 6 a W a o "zi 5 N cc §5 _ 5 52 9r 5 o ' S < < 2 z °v Z m m U) (1 D . CI ® • • 40 + • _a 39