Loading...
Agenda 04/09/1987 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA April 9, 1987 The Parks and Re9re19S7naAdvisory a. m°aon the meeting 3rd floor b held F Thursday, ( rear of boardroom) of the Collier County Courthouse. I. Call to Order II. Approval of Minutes of March 19, 1987 III. Introduction of new member Fred Thomas IV. Additional items ( if necessary) V. Old Business A. Update of community parks B. Discussion of future Comprehensive Plan C. Approval of neighborhood parks dedication for Petition R86-24C Pavilion Lakes D. Approval of current Comprehensive Plan Amendment E. Review proposed conceptual site plan of Lely Barefoot Beach Park VI. New Business A. Discussion of Fiscal Year 1987/88 budget process B. Discussion of Easter Egg Hunt and Drop Special Event C. Discussion of Recreation Supervisor position D. Discussion of next issue of "Leisure Line" Tabloid E. Change Order for North Naples Community Park — playground equipment installation F. Change Order for Golden Gate Community Park — Santa Barbara Blvd. — final payment for paving G. Approval of Bid #87-1087 Park Maintenance equipment VII. Adjournment DPL: pc DIRECTOR' S COMMENTS Item V. A. Update of community parks An update of community park construction status will be discussed by a Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll and Peek representative. Update included in packet. Item V. B. Discussion of future Comprehensive Plan Discussion will be held by Dan Loubier. Item V. C. Approval of neighborhood parks dedication for Petition R86-24C Pavilion Lakes Discussion by Barbara Cacchione, Planning Department. Item V. D. Approval of current Comprehensive Plan Amendment Discussion by Barbara Cacchione, Planning Department. Item V. E. Review proposed conceptual site plan of Lely Barefoot Beach Park Discussion by Cliff Crawford and Dan Loubier. Item VI . A. Discussion of Fiscal Year 1987/88 budaet process Discussion by Cliff Crawford and Dan Loubier. Item VI . B. Discussion of Easter Eoo Hunt and Drop Special Event Discussion by Marilyn McGinty. Item VI . C. Discussion of Recreation Supervisor position Discussion by Marilyn McGinty. Item VI . D. Discussion of next issue of "Leisure Line" Tabloid Discussion by Marilyn McGinty. Item VI . E. Change Order for North Naples Community Park - playground equipment installation Discussion by Murdo Smith. Item VI . F. Change Order for Golden Gate Community Park - Santa Barbara Blvd. - final payment for pavina Discussion by Murdo Smith. Item VI . G. Approval of Bid #87-1087 Park Maintenance equipment Discussion by Murdo Smith. 11► March 19 , 1987 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board met on this date at 9: 00 A.M. in Building "F" of the Courthouse Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following mem- bers present: Ron Burton Charles Stevens Scott McQuillin ALSO PRESENT: Clifford Crawford, Parks & Recreation Director; Murdo Smith, Parks & Recreation Supervisor; Dan Loubier , Parks & Recreation Coordinator; Patricia Cookson, Parks & Recreation Department Secretary. Minutes transcribed from tapes by Maureen Kenyon, Deputy Clerk. AGENDA I. Call to Order II. Approval of minutes of February 19 , 1987 III. Additional items (if necessary) IV. Old Business A. Update of community parks B. Discussion of future 1988 Comprehensive Plan V. New Business A. Request review of neighborhood parks dedication for Petition R86-24C - Pavilion Lakes B. Discuss Comprehensive Plan Amendment of current 1983 Comprehensive Plan C. Approval of pay request to Harper Brothers of $5 ,701. 30 for increased quantity of paving at immokalee Commuity Park Page 1 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MARCH 19, 1986 D. Approval of Amendment of Professional Services Agreement of Wilson, Miller , Barton, Soll & Peek, Inc. contract E. Approval to award Bid #1079 for bleachers for County parks in the amount of $7, 960 F. Approval to aware Bid #1078 for security alarm system at community parks maintenance facilities in the amount of $3 , 675 G. Discussion of Staffing Immokalee and Golden Gate Community Parks H. Request approval to open bank accounts in Immokalee and North Naples I . Request approval to apply for Summer Food Grant in Immokalee during summer program J. Approval to award Bid #87-1068 Administrative Building Vi . Adjournment MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19, 1987 - APPROVED Mr. McQuillin moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried una- nimously, that the minutes of February 19, 1987 , be approved with Mr. McQuillin indicating that in the last paragraph on Page 4 that states that he indicated that "this item should have been on the original RFP' s " was not stated by him. REQUEST TO HARPER BROTHERS OF $5 , 701. 30 FOR INCREASED QUANTITY OF PAVING AT IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY PARK - RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Parks Superintendent Smith stated that this is a final paving request for the Harper Brothers for paving that was completed under Part I , Phase II of the Immokalee Park. He stated that this was an increased quantity as there was a slight overrun in Page 2 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MARCH 19 , 1986 the amount of paving and grading that was done. He stated that this was in the contract. Mr. McQuillin moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried una- nimously, that the request to Harper Brothers of $5,701. 30 for increased quantity of paving at Immokalee Community Park be approved. AMENDMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT OF WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK, INC. CONTRACT - RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Parks Superintendent Smith stated that in 1985 the East Naples Park site had to be redesigned because of environmental concerns and Wilson, Miller , Barton, Soll & Peek, Inc. was instructed to proceed with the redesigning of the park and that cost is approximately $8 , 000 , but they are requesting that some of the items in the original contract be deleted so that there will be no cost change in the contract price. He noted that the sections that are being deleted are revenue management program, maintenance and overhead expense investigation, and operating and maintenance manual. Mr. Stevens moved, seconded by Mr. McQuillin and carried una- nimously, that the amendment of professional services agreement of the Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll & Peek, Inc. Contract be recommended for approval. BID #1079 FOR BLEACHERS FOR COUNTY PARKS - RECOMMENDED TO BE AWARDED TO BAY BLEACHERS IF SPECIFICATIONS ARE MADE AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, OTHERWISE AWARD BID TO SWARTZ Parks Superintendent Smith stated that this is not approval of bid award as of this date, adding that the bid that met all Page 3 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MARCH 19 , 1986 the specifications that were required was from Swartz & Associates, adding that their bid was $796 per unit. He noted that the low bidder did not meet the specifications but there was another firm called Bay Bleachers of Tampa that submitted a bid of $749 per unit and they are checking into these bleachers to see if they meet the specifications. He noted that Bay Bleachers includes complete assembly of the units , and therefore, they have not decided at this point whether to go with Bay Bleachers or Swartz . He stated that staff would like to look at Bay Bleachers equipment first. He stated that they also need to check into the insurance requirements. Mr. McQuillin moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried una- nimously, that if Bay Bleachers meets all the bid specifications and insurance requirements that it be recommended that they be awarded Bid #1079 for bleachers for County Parks and in the event all requirements are not met, then Swartz & Associates be awarded this bid. BID #1078 FOR SECURITY ALARM SYSTEM AT COMMUNITY PARKS MAINTENANCE FACILITIES IN AMOUNT OF $3,675 - RECOMMENDED TO BE AWARDED TO NAPLES SOUND SYSTEM Parks Superintendent Smith stated that these are alarm systems for maintenance facilities at Immokalee, North Naples and Marco Island. He stated that this is a service agreement type of contract whereby they inspect the system and therefore, there is annual service costs. He noted that Naples Sound System was Page 4 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MARCH 19, 1986 second low bid as far as installation of the equipment, but over a five year period, they are considerably less than the low bidder . Mr. McQuillin moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried una- nimously, that Bid #1078 for security alarm system at Community Parks Maintenance Facilities in the amount of $3,675 be recom- mended to be awarded to Naples Sound System. ESTABLISHMENT OF BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNTS AT NAPLES FEDERAL BANK IN NAPLES AND THE FIRST BANK OF IMMOKALEE IN IMMOKALEE Dan Loubier , Coordinator , stated that since the installation of meters at the community parks for court usage and parking in the North Naples area , Staff would like to be able to open bank accounts in those areas to make it easier to deposit the money. He stated that he is requesting approval to open a bank account at Naples Federal Bank in North Naples and at the First Bank of Immokalee in Immokalee. Mr. McQuillin moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried una- nimously, that the establishment of Business Checking Accounts at Naples Federal Bank in North Naples and the First Bank of Immokalee in Immokalee be recommended for approval. APPLICATION FOR SUMMER FOOD GRANT IN IMMOKALEE DURING SUMMER PROGRAM - RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Dan Loubier , Coordinator , stated that this is an on-going program that is offered during the summer and ties into the summer program that is offered in Immokalee. He stated that Page 5 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MARCH 19 , 1986 Immokalee has the ability to be able to take advantage of a free summer food program for the children that are involved in the program. He noted that the program is funded by the State of Florida and Staff is involved with the School Board to prepare the lunches and there is no cost to the County, adding that it is on a reimbursement basis from the State. Mr. Stevens moved, seconded by Mr. McQuillin and carried una- nimously, that the application for summer food grant in Immokalee during the summer program be recommended for approval. BID #87-1068 FOR ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING - RECOMMENDED TO BE AWARDED TO CORNERSTONE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Dan Loubier , Coordinator , stated that the Administrative Office Center is planned for the Golden Gate Community Park and at this time, 3 companies have bid on the project. He stated that Cornerstone Construction came in as the low bidder of $189 , 500 and all three companies met the bid specifications . He stated that he is requesting that the low bidder of Cornerstone Construction be recommended for approval . Mr . Loubier stated that there is $300 , 000 budgeted for this building, landscaping, and irrigation. He stated that this bid is actually low compared to what Staff had figured and they feel comfortable that the entire building, landscaping and irrigation will be able to be done for the $300 , 000 that was budgeted. Mr. McQuillin moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried una- nimously, that Bid #87-1068 be recommended to be awarded to Cornerstone Construction, Inc. , in the amount of $189,500. Page 6 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MARCH 19 , 1986 DISCUSSION OF ISLE OF CAPRI LOTS - ADDED TO AGENDA Mr . Don Stevenson, representing Isle of Capri Civic Association, stated that they have been working on trying to get some of the areas spruced up and they have to deal with the Parks Dept. , the Road Dept. , and the Water Dept. He stated that there are areas that are going to be mowed by the Parks Dept. and there are other areas that are limestone that need grass seed and he is questioning if this can all be done through one department. He stated that there is a median strip on the end of Capri Blvd. that needs to be taken care of and also an area at the water tank area that needs sprucing up and he would like to see Parks & Recreation Department handle it all. He stated that they would also like to see the bicycle path taken care of as it needs some maintenance work. lk Mr . Burton questioned if these properties are designated as County park properties, to which Parks & Recreation Director Crawford replied affirmatively. Mr . Stevenson referred to a map indicating the various areas that need maintenance. Mr . Joe Podesta, representing Isle of Capri Fire Department, stated that the County put in a parking lot in Isle of Capri and in back of the parking lot, the Fire Department went through con- siderable expense to sod it and put in a sprinkler system. He stated that this is County property but cars and pickup trucks Page 7 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MARCH 19 , 1986 drive on the sod and break down the sprinklers and questioned if there is anyway that the County can put up signs or something to keep these vehicles off this property? He stated that the Fire Department maintains the property for the County, but the sprinkler heads are getting expensive to constantly replace. He stated that every department that they speak with says it is not their problem and, therefore, they are approaching the Parks & Recreation Department to see if something can be done. Mr . Burton stated that just because someone gives Parks & Recreation Department land in order to have it maintained, it is not going to work. He questioned if there is any suggestion or anyway that the Parks & Recreation Department could handle this matter? Parks & Recreation Director Crawford stated that he would like to check into the matter and come back to the next meeting with some type of recommendation. He stated that there is a lot of beautification needed in the County and a higher level of ser- vice, but at the same time, Staff has to make a lot of decisions regarding matters of this type. He stated that he wants to be sure that all work is constant throughout the County system. Mr . Stevens left the meeting at approximately 9 : 40 A.M. and there was no longer a quorum. PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Ron Burton, Vice Chairman Page 8 e o ° WILSON • MILLER • BARTON • BOLL& PEEK, INC. n 4:: K' ': 1 NORTH NAPLES Status: Under Construction Estimated Completion Date: June, 1987 Contracts Status 1 . BP1 - Site Preparation 100% complete (Harper Bros. , Inc. ) 2. BP2 - Site Electric 98% complete - remaining work: (Mid-Continent Buildings electric and aim Electric, Inc. ) recreational lighting. 3 . BP3 - Buildings and Shelters 99% complete - remaining work : I (Bunn Construction, punch items Inc. ) 4. BP4 - Sitework Finishes 80% complete - remaining work: I OP- (McGovern Construction Complete fencing, irrigation Corp. ) system and landscaping. 5. BP5 - Outdoor Game Courts 100% complete - remaining work : (McGovern Construction Miscellaneous finishes. Corp. ) 6. BP6 - Paving * 60% complete - remaining work: (MacAsphalt, Inc. ) Asphalt for roads and parking, limerock and asphalt for sidewalks. * Presently conducting miscellaneous fine grading and pavement shoulder repair throughout the site. Estimated time for completion of all asphalt paving is April 24th. 4 1 ID e 0 WILSON • MILLER • BARTON • BOLL & PEEK, INC. MARCO ISLAND Status: Under construction. Estimated Completion Date: June, 1987 . ( See note) Contracts Status 1 . BP1 - Sitework and Paving 60% Parking areas in progress . (Better Roads, Inc. ) 2. BP2 - Buildings and Site Buildings dried-in. Constrction Electric continues on schedule. (Mollenhauer, Inc. ) 3. BP3 - Landscaping and Miscellaneous underground Irrigation sleeves installed. (See note) (Sunny Grove Landscaping Inc. ) NOTE : Completion date may be delayed as a result of contract negotiations with Landscape Contractor. A completion schedule will be developed when negotiations are completed. EAST NAPLES Status: Presently, various permits are being processed with the Army Corps of Engineers, and South Florida Water Management District. Design efforts are in progress. Estimated Begin Construction: July, 1987 Estimated Completion Date: April , 1988 NOTE : All completion dates are estimated dates based on the best information available at this time. Not until the final 30+ days of construction can a reliable, accurate construction schedule be established for the purposes of planning a park opening date. These completion dates will constantly be updated to reflect the expected progress of the work. c • + • WILSON • MILLER • BARTON • BOLL& PEEK, INC. MEMORANDUM DATE: April 2 , 1987 TO: Clifford Crawford, Director Collier County Parks and Recreation Department FROM: Robert E. Furlong 'a Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll & Peek, Inc. SUBJECT: Collier County Community Parks Update Summary GOLDEN GATE Status: Open Minor shake-down and warranty work continuing. IMMOKALEE Status: Open Minor shake-down and warranty work continuing. COUNTY GOVERNMENT CALCULATION OF PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS REQUIRED COUNT COST VALUE COUNTY OF INVENTORY SURPLUS OR PER OR TYPE OF FACILITY 9/30/92 9/87 (DEFICIENCY) UNIT COST Archery/trap/skeet range 0 0 0 $ 780,000 $ -0- Amphitheater 2 1 (1) 100,000 (100,000) Badminton Courts 0 0 0 10,000 -0- Baseball fields 6 2 (4) 170,000 (680,000) Basketball /volleyball crts 30 6 (24) 17,500 (420,000) Beach Access Bicycle trails - miles 9.4 3 (6.4) 50,160 (321 ,024) Camping/R.V. park - sites 0 0 0 4,500 -0- Canoe trails - miles 15.7 0 (15.7) -0- -0- Children's Playgrounds 20 14 (6) 7,000 (42,000) Civic Centers 0 0 0 1 ,700,000 -0- Community centers 6 2 (4) 610,000 (2,440,000) Community parks - acres 219 126 (32) 24,000 (768,000) Equestrian trails - miles 0 0 0 31 ,680 -0- Fitness station - trails 9 0 (9) 50,000 (450,000) Football fields, lighted 6 0 (6) 135,000 (810,000) Golf Course, 18 hole 0 0 0 2,000,000 -0- Gymnasium 1 0 (1) 910,000 (910,000) Jogging trails - miles 4 1 (3) 26,400 (79,200) Community Pool 1 0 (1) 450,000 (450,000) Olympic Pool 1 0 (1) 1 ,564,000 (1 ,564,000) Picnic Pavilions 16 1 (15) 28,000 (420,000) Piers - Freshwater 1 1 0 30,000 -0- Racquetball Courts 20 12 (8) 17,500 (140,000) Shuffleboard Courts 12 9 (3) 6,250 (18,750) Soccer fields 5.5 1 .5 (4) 135,000 (540,000) Softball fields 20 (18) (2) 125,000 (250,000) Parkland - regional size 500 0 (500) 10,000 (5,000,000) (excludes community parks) Tennis courts 10 22 11 18,750 -0- Track and Field 1 0 (1) 191 ,520 (191 ,520) Boat ramps - freshwater 9 2 (7) 180,262 (1 ,261 ,834) Boat ramps -- saltwater 19 6 (13) 180,262 (2,343,406) Total 943.6 191 .5 (656.1) $ 9,562,784 $(19,199,734) DPL:pc Parks and Rec. 4/2/87 MEMORANDUM TO: The Parks Advisory Board FROM: Barbara Cacchione Planner III DATE: March 10, 1987 RE: Review of Rezone Petition R-86-24C, "Pavilion Lake", For Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Petition R-86-24C, "Pavilion Lake", is a request to rezone approximately 15 acres from C-4 and RMF-6 to PUD for a proposed development containing 180 multi-family dwelling units. The property is located north of the Pavilion Shopping Center on the west side of U.S. 41 in Section 33, T48S, R25E. It is within the Urban Future Land Use District. FINDINGS & ANALYSIS In reviewing this petition for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, the project was rated using the Point Rating System to determine the availability of services and facilities and to establish a maximum density range. The density range achieved by this project is 0-4 units per gross acre. However, if the petitioner were to make necessary commitments to bring U.S. 41 to a LOS "C" at the intersection with Vanderbilt Beach Road, then the maximum density range achieved would be 0-8 units per gross acre. The petitioner has requested 12 units per gross acre in the PUD document. In order to comply with the Comprehensive Plan and achieve the density of 12 units per gross acre the petitioner proposes to use the option of a payment in lieu of land dedication for a Neighborhood Park. This option awards the petitioner 10 points and increases the density range to the maximum allowed under the Zoning Ordinance. The section of the Comprehensive Plan which discusses the Neighborhood Park option is attached for reference. To determine the Neighborhood Park payment for the development the process outlined in the Comprehensive Plan on page 33 was used. If the Neighborhood Park payment is to be used, the PUD document must be amended with language inserted which states that the petitioner will make a payment to the Board of County Commissioners in the amount of $81,000 to be used for a neighborhood park. The petitioner must identify if any private recreational facilities within the development will be credited towards the required park dedication fee. If so, facilities shall be listed in the PUD document and shown on the site plan. Appropriate assurances must be given and reviewed by the County Attorney to ensure that the recreational facilities will be developed and maintained. The monies collected from the developer must be held in a trust and be earmarked for the immediate needs of the residents of that development or for improvement of other existing parks which already serve those needs. If the money is not spent within seven years it will be forwarded to the Department of Parks and Recreation general operating budget. The money will be collected by the Board of County Commissioners. This petition is scheduled for review by the Parks Advisory Board on March 19, 1987. The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) is tentatively scheduled to hear this petition on April 16, 1987, followed by the BCC. Through the annual amendment process, Planning Department staff has recommended that the Neighborhood Parks Option be deleted from the Point Rating System of the Comprehensive Plan. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan has been initiated and will be heard in a workshop before the CCPC on April 2, 1987. Review R-86-24C Pavilion Lake Step 1: Estimate development population Number of Dwelling Units Population Per Estimated in the Development X Dwelling Unit = Development (proposed) Population 180 2.5 450 Step 2: Estimate needed facilities Development population acres of facility acres of (expressed in thousands) needed per 1,000 recreational persons facility needed for the develop- ment .450 2 .90 Step 3: Estimate fees (Payment in lieu of land dedication) Acres of recreational land fee for the facility needed for the X acquisition = development the development cost per acre .90 $90,000 $81,000 The land acquisition fee was determined by a market analysis conducted by Coastal Engineering Consultants. Their report, which is attached, has been reviewed by Pat Carroll of the Real Property Mangement Department. It is her opinion that the methodology used is an appropriate and acceptable method to determine the market value of the property. COLLIER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN B. Point Rating System The point rating system is a primary mechanism in the implementation of the Land Use Plan. The basic component of the point system is proximity to existing or proposed community services and facilities. Where distance from a facility is a factor, it is measured as a straight line directly from the facility to the anticipated entrance of the proposed project. Residential rezone petitions will be evaluated using all criteria in the point system. The total number of points received will be assessed according to the density table and a maximum allowable density will be identified. The final density approved for a project may be more or less than the maximum due do to other factors such as, but not limited to environmental constraints, compatability with surrounding land uses, location, and size of project. Commercial and industrial rezone petitions will be evaluated using an abbreviated version of the point system in conjunction with the Land Use Map. From the point system, commercial and industrial rezone petitions will be assessed using the access, water, sewer, fire and PUD criteria. These five criteria add up to a possible maximum of 65 points. A commercial or industrial rezone petition must receive 40 points or more to be in compliance with the Plan. It is recognized that there are areas in the County whose current zoning has been declared in compliance with this Plan but could not currently pass the previously described tests. This might include residential zoning which allows a greater density than that permit- ted under the point rating system. In those cases, the subject property may be rezoned to another residential district at or below the previous district's density. Mixed use developments which were zoned prior to this Plan's adoption and which cannot meet the Plan's requirements may be rezoned to Planned Unit Development if the overall residential density remains the same or lower, and the acreage of other uses within the development (commercial, indus- trial, etc.) does not exceed previous amounts. All permitted principal and provisional uses identified in the Agricultural zoning districts as described in the most recent Collier County Zoning Ordinance shall be allowed in any land use designation of this Plan. The Point Rating System criteria are as follows: 1. Proximity to Commercial Node or Developed Community or Regional Commercial Use (15 points possible) Less than or equal to one mile 15 Greater than one mile & less than or equal to two miles 10 Greater than two miles & less than or equal to three miles 5 C- 28 ' (7' 2. Vehicular Access to An Arterial With Level of Service * "C" or Better (20 points possible) Directly Adjacent 20 Within 1 mile via collector having a level of service "c" or better 15 Greater than 1 mile via collector having a level of service "c" or better 10 Less than 2 miles via local roads 5 . 3. Water Supply (15 points possible) Central system 15 Private well 2 4. Sewer Service (15 points possible) Central system Septic Tank 15 2 5. Fire Protection (10 points possible)** Within fire district with level of service C "7" or better and within 3 miles of fire station Within fire district with level of service 10 "7" or better and more than 3 miles from a 1 fire station Within a fire district with level of service 6 "8" to "10" and within 3 miles of a fire station 4 Within a fire district with level of service "8" to "10" 2 6. Access to Public Schools *** (15 points possible) Within 1 mile of existing school linked by improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 15 Within 1 mile of existing school without improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 12 Between 1-2 miles of existing school linked by improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 9 Between 1-2 miles of existing school without improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 6 7. Submission of Project As A Planned Unit Development 5 (5 points possible) 8. Neighborhood Parks**** (10 points possible) Dedication or payment in lieu thereof for neighborhood park sites and/or facilities 10 29 Rev.3 , ( 9. Affordable Housing***** (20 oints Aip possible) 1007 of project provides affordable rental housing 20 10. Other (5 points possible) Open to Board of County Commissioners 5 discretion for developers to opt to commit to provide facilities, land or cash for facilities not specifically identified on the previous criteria. DENSITY TABLE DENSITY ALLOWED IN URBAN AREA POINTS SCORED (UNITS/ACRE) 90-100 Maximum permitted under Zoning Ordinance for requested , 4:- zoning category 85- 89 a ma ximum of 80- 84 II 75- 79 It �� " 6 70- 74 11 II 11 5 C� 60- 69 11 " „ 4 50- 59 " It " 3 40- 49 " to " 2 30- 39 11 „ „ 1 0- 29 " it " .5 Footnotes * Points will be awarded for access to arterial and collector roadways that are existing or approved and funded in the five (5) year work- program. Where collectors and/or arterials do not exist or currently operate at a level of service below "c", credit may be given for such roadways provided the petitioner commits to constructing the improvements necessary to provide level of service "c" or better. The extent of the necessary improvement would be determined by the County Transportation Department. ** A developer may opt to dedicate a fire station site to the Fire District or an equivalent cash donation where capital improvements are incomplete at the fire station projected to serve the developer's site. If the Fire District accepts the site or the cash equivalent for the construction of a station, the developer may be awarded 3 points. l 30 Rev.3 *** A developer may opt to dedicate a site for a public school to the County School Board or an equivalent cash donation where capital improvements are incomplete at the school site projected to serve the developer's site. If a developer chooses one of these options, the proposed public school site or donation would have to be approved by the County School Board. If a developer chooses to dedicate a site or cash equivalent to the County School Board and if the County School Board accepts the site or cash equivalent only for a school site, the developer may be awarded 8 points. In addition, those projects with medical features such as life care facil- ities, retirement communities with health care facilities and adult congregate living facilities receive the full 15 points. **** Optional; to implement this program the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will be designated as the body to oversee this procedure. The Advisory Board will review all future residential rezones of 100 units or more for compliance with the following criteria. 1. Criteria - All residential developments of 100 units or more shall be required to contribute acceptable neighbor- ( hood park facilities. The 1980 Census figure of 2.5 persons per household (housing unit) will be used to arrive at the total population for the proposed devel- opment. A development of 100 units with an estimated population of 250 would begin to impact upon the park facilities in the area and create an additional need. The standard used for determining the necessary park require- ments is a neighborhood park is 2 acres per 1,000 popu- lation. 2. Site Dedication & Selection Criteria: If the developer chooses to dedicate land for a park site the following criteria regarding the selection of that site must be met. Also, the site would be deeded to the county, who would then be responsible for the maintenance of the site. Site Selection for Neighborhood Parks a. The site must be a minimum of (5) contiguous acres; b. Where possible, it should be located adjacent to an elementary school; c. The site must be suitable for recreational or park use and capable of immediate development or developed at a mutual- ly agreed upon time; d. The site must be suitably located with respect to the surrounding developments that it serves; and e. Direct access cannot be to a road classified as an arter- ial or larger. 31 Rev.3 3. Payments-In-Lieu of Dedication - If a developer so chooses (7 and it is agreeable to the Board of County Commissioners, or if the Board of County Commissioners deem it is in the County's best interest, payments may be accepted in lieu of land dedications. The payments will be based on the fair market value of the amount of land to be dedicated. The fair market value will be determined at the time of the required dedication. The fair market value must be based on the land in the immediate area of the develop- ment. If a developer does not agree with the amount arrived at by the County, the developer may object and do his own independent appraisal. The County may use the independent appraised value if they so choose. The monies collected shall be held in a trust and must be tightly earmarked. The money paid by a developer must be used for the immediate needs of the residents of that development or for improvement of other existing parks which already serve those needs. If the money is not spent within seven years it will be forwarded to the Department of Parks and Recreation general operating budget. The money will be collected by the Board of County Commissioners. 4. Dedications and Payments - In some instances both land dedications and payments may be accepted by the County. This may occur if a major portion of a site has already been acquired. 5. Credit - In some instances, private recreational facil- ities within a development may be credited towards the required dedication. This credit cannot exceed 50% of the required acreage to be dedicated. a. Types of facilities eligible for credits: 1) Water related activities; 2) Group family picnic areas; 3) Golf courses; 4) Playgrounds (tot lots) ; 5) Recreational center; 6) Shuffleboard/horseshoe courts; 7) Swimming pools; 8) Tennis/racquetball courts; 9) Trails (horse, jogging, bicycle) L 10) Others - Each to be approved by the Parks and Rec- reation Advisory Board. 32 b. Percentage of Credit Allowed: Percentage Credit Number of Allowed Facilities Provided 50% 9- or more 40% 7- g 30% 5- 6 20% 4 10% 3 0% 0- 2 c. If a developer chooses to be credited for private recre- ational facilities, the private facilities must be clearly identified on the development site plan and plat, if appropriate. Assurance shall be given, in the form of subdivision deed restrictions, condominium declaration, homeowners agreements, or maintenance agreements that are legally acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners after review and approval by the County attorney that the areas shall be adequately maintained and that all home- owners or tenants shall be required to belong to and financially support the operation and maintenance of said facilities. The remaining acreage required shall be dedicated to the County in terms of a park site or a payment in lieu of a, dedication. Following are the three steps used in determining the amount of acreage or payment in lieu thereof: Step 1: Estimate development population Number of population estimated dwelling units X per dwelling = development in the development unit population Step 2: Estimate needed facilities Development acres of acres of population X facility = recreational (expressed in needed per facility needed thousands) 1,000 persons for the development Step 3: Estimate fees Acres of recreational land fee for the facility needed X acquisition = development for the development costs per acre a- 33 (7' ***** Optional; affordable rental housing is implemented by the Planned Unit Development District, Multi-Family Entry Level Rental Housing Areas, Section 7.27 f.6) of the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County as may be amended periodically. ( C 34 Rev.3 • COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. .'` Development Consultants • Coastal Engineers • Marine Scientists Jar^ Civil Engineers • Surveyors • Appraisal and Real Estate Consultants -011,44,41 `j 3106 S. Horseshoe Dr. • P.O. Box 8306 • Naples, Florida 33941 • (813) 643-2324 March 9 , 1987 Ms . Barbara Cacchione Planning Department Collier County Government Center 3301 Tamiami Trail , East Naples , FL 33962 RE: Pavilion Lake ; Park Land Valuation Analysis CEC File No . 86 . 023 Dear Ms . Cacchione : In accordance with your request , I have made a market study and analysis of the above referenced property . The purpose of the study was to estimate the market value of the property , and allocate proportionate value to a hypothetical . 90 acre portion of the total site . This allocated value of the . 90 acre piece is to be utilized as the basis for a cash contribution to Collier County in lieu of an actual donation of . 90 acres for public park purposes . The date of this valuation is March 7 , 1987 . While this evaluation analysis does not constitute a narrative appraisal by any means , it is based on sound appraisal technique and is as accurate a market analysis of sales and conditions in the subject ' s area as the scope of this assignment warranted . It is my understanding that this format is suitable and acceptable to your needs . Market value is defined as "The most probable price in terms of money which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale , the buyer and seller , each acting prudently , knowledgeably and assuming the price is n?t)affected by undue stimulus" ( Emphasis generally added ) . The study consisted of my personal inspection of the property on Saturday , March 7 , 1987 , as well as as study of the general area . In addition to the County Assessor ' s office , sales data publications and our own office files were researched for sales data , which was used to arrive at the indicated estimate of market value . ( 1 )AIREA , Real Estate Appraisal Terminology , Page 137 Ms . Barbara Cacchione March 9 , 1987 Page 2 Because the subject project is a vacant parcel , of the three classic approaches to value normally used ( Cost , Market and Income Approaches ) , only the Market Approach is considered applicable . The market approach is the process of analyzing sales of similar recently sold properties in order to derive an indication of the most probable sales price of the property being appraised . The subject property is physically located contiguous to , and north of , the Pavilion Shopping Center which at the northwest corner of North Tamiami Trail ( U . S . 41 ) and Vanderbilt Beach Road (S . R. 862 ) in the North Naples/Vanderbilt Beach area of Collier County , Florida . The subject is legally described by a lengthy metes and bounds description which is attached hereto . The site has 218 . 97 feet of frontage on Tamiami Trail and 1 , 169 . 74 of frontage on 91st Avenue . The property ' s southern boundary is an irregular (zig-zag ) line abutting the Pavilion Shopping Center with a measured distance of 1 ,722 . 13 feet . The western property line abuts the Beach Walk residential condominium project and measures 436 . 36 feet . The property is currently zoned as RSF-6 (Residential Multi -Family District ) for approximately 14 . 14 acres . The residential land is the larger part of the total parcel lying 300 feet west of Tamiami Trail . The remaining 1 . 53 acres of the subject is that irregular shaped portion extending 300 feet deep from Tamiami Trail and is zoned C-4 (Commercial General ) . Physical characteristics of the site include a 2 . 89 acre lake , 1 . 53 acres of jurisdictional wetlands , 11 . 25 acres of pine uplands and some minor site improvements including a paved path from the Pavilion Shopping center to 91st Avenue and some drainage structures . Total acreage of this parcel is 15 . 67 acres . At the southwest corner of Tamiami Trail and 91st Avenue there is an out-parcel of 1 . 59 acres of uplands which is not the subject of this analysis . That portion of the property which is zoned C-4 and containing 1 . 53 acres is found to be of nominal value (based on utility ) as a commercial tract . This parcel has been determined by a qualified Environmental Engineer to be almost totally jurisdictional wetlands . Therefore , while this portion of the site has commercial zoning , its highest and best use is as a water management area for the residential development of the remainder of the property which is non-jurisdictional and highly developable. Ms . Barbara Cacchione March 9 , 1987 Page 3 The overall highest and best use of this parcel , is for residential multi -family development . There is reasonable probability that the County Planning Department would allow a zoning change from C-4 to at least RMF-6 for the commercial wetlands so as to utilize the potential density of these 1 . 53 acres . The residential units would be transferred to the developable uplands leaving the wetlands along Tamiami Trail in their natural state as a buffer and part of the water management system for the entire parcel . The current Collier County Zoning Ordinances indicate that the subject property , by virtue of its existing RMF-6 zoning , and the reasonable probability that the 1 . 53 acres commercial portion could obtain rezone to RMF-6 , has a present maximum density of 6 units per acre , or 94 units for the entire 15 . 67 acres . It is further noted that the subject property , under the Community Development Division ' s " Point System" could now qualify for a PUD zoning change for up to 8 units per acre , or 125 units for the entire 15 . 67 acres . Based on the existing zoning in place for the subject parcel , highest and best use of this property , at this time , is for residential multi -family development of up to 94 units , provided all development requirements can be met . • In order to estimate the value of the subject property , sales with similar utility (or highest and best use ) are compared with the subject to determine an appropriate unit value ( price per developable unit in this case ) . Three recent sales in the subject ' s competitive market place were considered and a current contract , which at the request of the parties , must remain confidential . The three sales indicate unit values between $14 ,665 and $18 , 286 per developable unit . The confidential contract , while not heavily relied upon , is supportive at $15 ,500 per developable units . It should be noted that in the Naples area , developers who are buying and selling residential land are very aware of density and a great many of those active in the market are making buy/sell decisions based on cost per developable unit . Any particular tract is subject to local market expectations for that area and as a result , finished product pricing is important . A prudent developer knows what price range and product type a site is suited for prior to its purchase . The developer also knows what it will cost to construct the finished product (units ) in terms of both direct and indirect development costs , as well as his required profit per unit . The sum of these cost and profit subtracted from what the market will reasonably pay for the finished unit is that amount of dollars the developer can Ms . Barbara Cacchione March 9 , 1987 Page 4 afford to pay for the land on a per unit basis . This type A" of developer thinking is the rule rather than the exception in this area . It is my opinion that the subject falls near to the bottom • of the range of unit values indicated by the sales con- sidered . Refer to Sales Sheets 1 , 2 , 3 , and 4 , attached hereto for details of these sales . Sale 1 is the purchase of the Beach Walk site (adjacent to and west of the sub- ject ) . This property is considered superior to the subject due to access from Vanderbilt Beach Road and it being somewhat closer to beach access . Sales 2 is the purchase of Pelican Ridge a short distance to the north and is not given primary weight due to actual versus used density . While verification indicates that the motivation and basis of the sale was for construction of 140 units , actual density was higher which weakens the sales reliability somewhat . The most recent sale is the purchase of the Timberwood site on Airport Road . This sale is considered a good value indicator as it is perhaps not as close to the beach but does not have the negative characteristic of being accessed from 91st Avenue in Naples Park which is perceived as a lower class area . The homes across 91st Avenue from the subject support this as they have little , if any , pride of ownership , and are generally low cost housing units . With major emphasis on Sale 3 and support from the other sales , as well as the contract , it is my opinion that the appropriate unit value for the subject parcel is $15 ,000 per developable unit . In order to estimate the value of a . 90 acre portion of the subject to determine a basis for cash contribution to Collier County in lieu of donating a public park parcel , the established unit value will be multipled by the number of units that the . 90 acre portion of the property would contribute to the overall project. At 6 units per acre the . 90 acres represents 5 . 40 , or 5 units . When the market value of the units at $15 ,000 per developable unit is applied to the unit count , the estimated market value of the . 90 acres for a public park as of March 7 , 1987 , is : $15 ,000 x 5 developable units = $75 ,000 It should be noted and clearly understood that this value analysis represents a preliminary analysis/study and was not the result of a narrative appraisal investigation and , as such , the estimate of market value reported herein , while Ms . Barbara Cacchione March 9 , 1987 Page 5 considered reliable and accurate , would be subject to change in light of a complete appraisal being performed , if such was warranted . Very truly yours , COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS , INC . Douglas J . Dane , A. S .A . Vice-President/Broker Real Estate Division DJD/sam Attachment cc : Pat Carroll 4:)I COMPARABLE SALES DATA No . 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lengthy metes and bounds , portion of Section 33 , Township 48 , Range 25 , Collier County , Florida , as recorded in O . R . Book 1176 , Page 564 . LOCATION : Northern Naples SHAPE : Irregular FRONTAGE/ACCESS : 3 , 508 feet on Vanderbilt Beach Road , 440 feet on Vanderbilt Drive , 3 ,638 feet on 91st Avenue North . SIZE : 59 . 73 Acres ZONING : RMF-6 (maximum density 358 units ) HIGHEST & BEST USE : Residential Development UTILITIES : All available RECORDED : Official Record Book 1176 , Page 564 DATE OF SALE : January 1 , 1986 GRANTOR : Collier Development Corporation GRANTEE : Radnor Collier Corporation PRICE : $6 ,200 ,000 FINANCING : Cash UNIT OF VALUE : $17 ,318 per developable unit VERIFICATION SOURCE : Grantor , Grantee , Public Records COMMENTS : This site is located just west of the Pavilion Shopping Center and is currently being developed as the Beachwalk Community . • COMPARABLE SALES DATA No . 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : P/O Lot 2 , Tract B , Pine Ridge , Second Extension LOCATION : South side of Hickory Road , 1/8 mile east of U . S . 41 , Pine Ridge Subdivision SHAPE : Near Rectangular FRONTAGE/ACCESS : Hickory Boulevard Entrance SIZE : 17 . 52 Acres ZONING : RMF-16 (maximum density 280 units/developed at 140 ) HIGHEST & BEST USE : Residential Development UTILITIES : All available RECORDED : Official Record Book 1060 , Page 38 DATE OF SALE : December 30 , 1983 GRANTOR: The National Trust Company , Trust No . 5251 ) GRANTEE : Naples Villa Development , Inc . PRICE : $2 ,800 , 000 ( deed ) , $2 , 560 ,000 ( cash equivalent ) FINANCING : Cash plus $2 , 100 ,000 PMM , 11% interest , semi -annual payments , first year interest only , second through fifth year are equal P & I payments . Cash equivalent value of mortgage is approximately $1 ,860 ,000 plus $700 , 000 cash , equals cash equivalent price of $2 , 560 ,000 . UNIT OF VALUE : $18 , 286 per units ( based on cash equivalency and actual density ) . VERIFICATION SOURCE: Grantors attorney , Stanley J . Lieberfarb COMMENTS : Property was purchased for development as Pelican Ridge at a density under maximum allowable . Market indications support low density and higher quality product due to Pine Ridge location . Based on the sales verification , the unit value based on what Grantor intended to build is of greater significance than zoned density . COMPARABLE SALES DATA No . 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of the W 1/2 of the SW 1/4 , Section 13 , Township 49 South , Range 25 East , less W100 ' , Collier County , Florida . LOCATION : East side of Airport Road , approxi - mately 2 ,000 feet south of Pine Ridge Road SHAPE : Irregular FRONTAGE/ACCESS : Approximately 660 feet on canal adjacent to Airport Road SIZE : 18 . 49 Acres ZONING : A-2 ( purchased subject to PUD rezone for 116 units ) HIGHEST & BEST USE : Residential Development UTILITIES : All but sewer until County has capacity , until such time on site sewage treat- ment plant is required . RECORDED: Official Record Book 1192 , Page 653 DATE OF SALE : April 17 , 1986 GRANTOR : C. J . Mozzochi GRANTEE : Louis F . Reynaud , IV , Trustee PRICE : $1 , 566 , 000 ( deed ) , $1 , 700 ,000 ( cash equivalent ) FINANCING : $434 ,000 PMM at 10% , $232 , 000 at 0% , see comments UNIT OF VALUE : $13 , 500 per unit ( deed ) , $14 , 655 per unit ( cash equivalent ) VERIFICATION SOURCE : Grantee , public records COMMENTS : Access to this sale required purchaser building a bridge across major Collier County drainage/retention canal . Engineer ' s estimate to build this bridge was approximately $200 ,000 . Project is known as Timberwood . $434 ,000 PMM at 10% contains release clauses which will accelerate payment to very short term note and is considered cash equivalent . $232 ,000 note at 0% interest is obviously atypical and represents present cash value of law approximately $ 162 ,000 , based on cash 4171) equivalence calculations assuming ten year amortization and five year terms (total sellout of 116 units ) with normal seller financing at 10% . Total cash equivalence per calcu - lations is $900 ,000 cash plus $434 ,000 PMM , plus $162 ,000 ( cash equivalent ) PMM , $200 ,000 for access bridge equals $ 1 ,696 ,000 . Grantee stated he was aware of atypical financing in his favor and said in his mind the cash equivalent value was $13 ,000 per unit , or $1 , 508 ,000 ( plus bridge $200 ,000 ) equals $1 ,708 ,000 . The appraisers have correlated to a total cash equivalent price of $ 1 , 700 ,000 or $ 14 , 655 per unit for 116 units . 4:) 4 COMPARABLE SALES DATA No . 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Confidential contract LOCATION : Wiggins Pass Road , west of U . S . 41 SHAPE : Irregular FRONTAGE/ACCESS : Wiggins Pass Road SIZE : Approximately 76 acres ZONING : RMF-6 (contract based on 342 units density ) 0 HIGHEST & BEST USE : Residential development UTILITIES : All available RECORDED : Recent contract DATE OF SALE : Scheduled to close early 1987 GRANTOR : Confidential contract GRANTEE : Confidential contract PRICE : $5 , 301 , 000 FINANCING : To be a cash to seller ( acquisi - tion/construction mortgage ) UNIT OF VALUE : $15 , 500 per unit VERIFICATION SOURCE : Purchaser , contract COMMENTS : Purchaser , stated contract based on a unit value of $ 15 , 500 per attainable unit , it is reported that County will allow 342 units maximum . ,F -•���88 WIGGINS PASS _RD lirTiriI.1a:1.t4+.P IYP[{AL GOLF ary.. .. ---... ---- A 25 E • U t a CAPI38[AM � � [surtt / M y� /■ yu • PARK ,a y n"`"Y Dp i E rAX;..._ S ..UK W .h1 '.f.I:A,krp,t • � E!i�.'.1 1. 'K GLEN FAV ele 4 a�J .-i M x 25 Cir ..,1 • . k" EIl1Atil• a•D I Y C PALM MITER -_I :i.,.. ,I �MAI.rN RyT N ••7-'4, : j+ *-low,2,..41,-.01- - _..GP. WXIauGN/' ..t. a u F ) /Al 4" y.I,wn Da_ACtls v•a vrc.,,. •"QQ Yr�,,4.17, s---I/'ilr Ante — _t Xlcaa I - u f v 219""'--,�"zoo'•, 'covYHYau/ D � �lsulls —. tnXnzceu e_ 2 a .. a _ o,w«R,y f ,'� '� ,r.« r...,v rM« < - «w sN.N'oac.. W S ANNEAL( ..._...,,„,c.„,,,,,,4 • I WLUEtlII.I.-- V s •I .".,«, "-"6N tii�1.fir..vg ua nP.P gIY!J �, AV r• 'l 11TH AV IMMOKALEE '"RD" v __ _ __ aA«,NCO ._ _—I_I,rX Ar 846 viLSA ti°SOUINWIND„, ,,- - —Jd t ' Q! NCRw Ar —="Y'” Ay •L, ESi v.....n+ u� - ,. ,Dl.N AV q f —MKT AV „ • r, - , • a 1 FANNERS AY --- IUE!N AV .�-}' ' N A r°6G�Y o \"Ur V€ D— GI A EDGIWILD { M sera"GEP_ANL - ,. sa O g I IST. T » r"-"-N.L=-°•x.i S ___ , APCES zr Ee L V YV'L�°°•NI,T .-- •I I 6 '6Y VSM1EPI ]0 -Ar '100"TIN -_ PARK- i q Iola • IRS.•Y•,.DS _ i� YIE7°EIA GOLDEN Nf RYEST Mks b' MI{ ]., °P LX I. ".�¢__9'iN y, 11^lV_ _ter -I (A�' I�' - L• -.j_TM .— —_ `]._-e. :A j v G -,� 11TN 6( F 77�r .....„...,1- �.? VANDEL131I.s 1_.sc,H _ Y • «9[t<, '"'•? \ -; yJ ao/y 1 ••w�� ; ,,�,� S YE IIu SA„Ilj�{ V 'SiN ,” rr/ �� r 1-__ •••._ S ,dcn•«{:. .-*-2 _ 'VGIIING.YI�D.''CRESCENT v _ _.-____.__.___ • BEACHP._. 4� - — «a w 4 CRESCENT S • GI — " Z MEP. IRTN RITZ• iCf NI(R A- CARLTON i V'A•OE a„). Subject • , 62 aEACH ".4t 7. a 14rP Land Sale 2 a -1- "" • u 41 DTV '--3• n an - al wI to .4.c aNp NxE' 1 r ' PR�PO°EO GOLDEN GATE�� .ms- s..,•lYD OR IR .!!!...1811 I '......1 I 00 1 0,f P ? v,_ 1. 0 p R25E R 26:_ -�F '! ..-ISNY.S_ FL'u ...l, CWRf LN VMS I UNTAIIA 'A KSS +b 1 I G 4 s� f '—.1,91.15-PINE I ° i j I RIDGE < a>rr.>w • a ' a ��'d APN/GEOnL455Q!' «i1'!GSPLO:.wNal-- II NRer "i =__JII Cu_„ SANG tMNtE I -,.'"/ .M.NkiyOiA �AMTMONrS,M ♦Y,[E} __JIR_.._�_ • laY yWp.D,NTE Cm�rDl';UR C�:fy • .±I I JEI i ` PQ•., = I I C 4 y.c'a'S I Fa4E 1° 1EsgnLDg-_ _ ;+"TJ c„o y, '' NYMICR`{ RD s✓• k mg I '�a'1,ANDG.NT OR. ' I 1.Y _ PDemsF_ - f - IYELICAN,,'� "a" 1 I - BAY .02-0"1"1 •I gV J [YD---_— IMY AV ,.FYI t, -1 r ?Le, 1 I I;OgEO•A1WP-OLVD._ l .,_FOWL a II Clam Prix � a'r7 I ♦ MioAl.1nAr a o; :TN ix 3^—i .1 •9 q p Y8:-..g, j .6.' - LI mils . VYrFPERONPDINT DR' IJ��••1 FII.S•,I'1.L,4r p «mrt♦�•• "+.SEW1DdM Q 3f',Q4lj!R_CE.i. Y ►LA • r Clans Flo ,n1, ,.!•— ■ ~ .hi. I ♦IK.L RO_•.w• f«il Boy •„ [r«,ii n .,,.A«a�a.• SM.t^±,6 —PFM AY SW 8. wuTE DR I u'! PINE • • 'IDGE I RD „PINE RID E I 'e0YA1 NIl EFCKS1�AfSORE'”-.+ . -r. ,r�o.- _ 896 a- J2' � S pR �i � LDxrsr LA14,17:41;.Y-4'n:• SEAWIE Iv,` r1, ,,._4._, '- '. ," a` SIG , c:,J"`Sa � •• i SX E ® .� 10TH Er.G.s.rst.a.nu. I 'SEAGATE gal ' a lef — „n""PA .,SJ ...:a•.x["4EE_,� `, ' g : ` ;�, y° �, ;�.:"� fog - �AYLroY aad In • ,. 'nM "�• y mar,,,.�•;;f� "«o N> �L S 18 12TH \ ' .YXISPR,XG PINES_ .I J PwI :N a ‘tI=1: NORTH ;^AxlmuF So'. r,,,*-. LN k[: y' L �• I p CM @NS4N� %.P.,r'Ly„�” I_u.DeED11!-L;,.?7 `L, KI 3 Wit. EniLL DR . ,,,,:$ A�D� 8 ' F! 1 iVRT L6 ' - 1tlL51DE� •rZ MJ ^ , l ___ . _- __ .--------- IPARK fj anenuluun_, NAPLES :% �:.''.." '5 >=1 .r,„ii, ERC' ::. T._ . .R ,..•C SO ANA PO G a,R7170 TMSL_--_ ,04.. r-..pa-101.4,20„7..74,4 E .,!,-. , .1 1"•,;I,L n:F "OLIL['O,NLIAMLM •'/• v ' T- o WOODS (>HOR1 r Ril Imo• ..c0`w•• (/ r C. Ea•In ar_ _N —911.9___ t ONIS I ! 'L' r y MFl1.. '� 4• -'I �ISMI~i,1ry Ar 1;'� _ l �-- C�t 1f RK ' 4".t eat' ItL'.:R _ c, :__ ft� 1i ' F, ♦ 1- �DA17 LR D"iviww ..T �' JAWLI__LIL i s :S lI 1a- Rxo N1N YIYD6 f1 tnN_lA.'Fran va .., rt -- ,� .v., . LLN a Land Sales Map •_ .r *IL•ST'll `t q .arm •m.N�i Mg r! I_ y ` F I M t4i Y°R"55. 85 L o y+� o RNDEIEEtE; IA y r D 1 ,y,,,r„,p • ' • t ' Ra iiiiiy G );peLN11QY1{.. iGLLd_� R��.RY 7E �”, �._•a,."-.. . .. 1 A[ 1'Ly1+! f �E•RD°E�us 7J v' `.�,' R •ya, .__ _... •7JJ?I •Wn _3 u + _itEI _tl➢ 1,i f � �* .�4. ■ ="`""-"'"'"'"`"'"4111. Cltz, -�—A.—1�-�— t 1 " I . • r. rri co J J m e •▪ . 5 a F u 3®. I u.• C) '0 ' s . - U ' 7,® 'Q. . , y®, , . • ., e .®• '' 'Q' © P ,l ---- ( ; . �•c" ?� cb- le K ) 10 i�Ki c s c O a N g 7TH 1. STREET s_ =,...to zzisi . MI N't Kiri 1 g",:-. nli IGi• Ig.1, :II,Qt : . _rd.ia E,O.: g �, ', U, ' g 1' "� g -®c • 8 ae� 5®' • ®l ,(l 7 '' "I.®q �• 4® ! " 1 . L--a' oQ ,.'.1.8®)1 = S(•). Q-= jk. 6®, tIIQ�= '4_S(A ^ ' ,o®) - , 6®, .C)• • A0.1)3 1 F' H^4 ( •Q- a = L.0: >®:a ..=(�)_ .O." - :.(0) 11110.1 CI 1 ' ' .. y6 . JO O. -O' Cow ! i . t fRa . s , ... .' ejC, Zy,it:(j1 •�,.,. ► a' 7. vrim ;Q += g®l 40. '1 8 . AO - °' •Kai . S • �8 TH���g� v STREET °- i ° ,... ...;40. Eli °�! =U'S t: 7(�: 1nn8 to '=Q.� 4 • , - _., u• • I, w.,t1 Ill . "_) . 1 El g o m j. i ;^ m O z z •' - A - z _0° ° . • �J-�l!„ i.. mil' ZO y :•".‘,). �� , O , V(1�,, t O f _ 1 '• ! .t*- 7. -e�' _.e,- ' S • 1 !- --' J▪ ':--- , sOo' . d .....,/ . . a• r.t O_V !; b a q d ▪ 'Z • us o TAMIAMI TRAIL U. S. - 41 s lak TRAIL MULEYIND 0 • PAVILION LAKE DESCRIPTION A parcel of land lying in Section 33 , Township 48 South , Range 25 East , Collier County , Florida , being more particu- larly described as follows : Commencing at the east quarter corner of said Section 33 , run S00° 37 ' 39" E along the east line of said Section 33 a distance of 17 . 65 feet to the extension of the northerly right-of-way line of Vanderbilt Beach Road ; thence N80°08126"W 152 . 55 feet along said extension to the inter- + section cf said northerly right-of-way line with the westerly right-of-way line of U . S . 41 ; thence continue N80°08 ' 20"W along said northerly right-of-way line 1565 . 50 feet ; thence N09°5114C" E 579 . 68 feet to the point of beginning of the herein described parcel ; thence 584° 14 ' 58" E 5115T. 44 feet ; thence S89' 34 ' 49" E )dee-roo feet ; thence S63°08 ' 19" E 4YO-.-35' feet ; thence N26° 51 ' 41" E ieTc44 feet ; thence S89°34 ' 49"E ti 6 0:0 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of U . S . 41 ; thence NOC° 39 ' 06"W along said right-of-way line liti7 feet ; Q thence leaving said right-of-way line N89°34 ' 49"W 107 Q feet ; thence N48° 50 ' 15" W 144;44, feet ; thence S77° 14 ' 04" W O •4-4-g- feet ; thence N00°39 ' 06"W :,.eka feet to the southerly right-of-way line of 91st Avenue North ; thence N89°34149"W N along said right-of-way line feet ; thence leaving said southerly right-of-way line SO9' 51 ' 40" W 4,i46---.-36 feet ; thence S80°08 ' 20" E 1 -. 1 hfeet ; thence S09°51 ' 40"W feet to the Point of Beginning of the herein described parcel . The above describes an area of approximately 15 . 67 acres of land . F75-1E_ Subject to easements , restrictions and reservations of record . 6 to -t- 8 2 4'f4 5 484.-1 -;% % ` , O Qu vv , k.4 • t•-18,'- 34-49" W WETLA�.i�s I.lOT LC)CATEU> Lid., c Ee SCOPE OF Tins sU VE`( j1 • QUALIFICATIONS OF DOUGLAS J . DANE Licensed Real Estate Broker #0193605 EDUCATION B.S. Degree in Business Administration , Real Estate Major Federal Highway Administrations Appraisal Review Course Florida Department of Transportation Right-Of-Way Appraisal Techniques American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers coursework: - Real Estate Appraisal Principles - Residential Valuation - Basic Valuation Procecures - Capitalization Theory and Technique - Part I - Capitalization Theory and Technique - Part 2 - Capitalization Theory and Technique - Part 3 - Case Studies In Real Estate Valuation - Valuation Analysis and Report Writing - Litigation Valuation - Industrial Valuation - Standards of Professional Practice Society of Real Estate Appraisers coursework: - Course 101 , Principles of Real Estate Appraisal - Course 201 , Income Property Valuation - Course 301 , Feasibility and Market Analysis REAL ESTATE EXPERIENCE 6/1985 to Present: Vice President, Real Estate Division, Coastal Engineering, Naples, Florida 1983 to 1985 : Review Appraiser, Florida Department of Trans- portation, District Four, Ft. Lauderdale , Fl. 1981 to 1983 : Broker-Appraiser, President/Owner of Lormann , Inc. Realtors, Altamonte Springs, Florida 1980 to 1981 : Sales Manager-Appraiser, Heart of Florida Real Estate Services, Longwood, Florida 1978 to 1980 : Real Estate Salesman, Fricke & Fricke Assoc . , Casselberry, Florida TYPES OF PROPERTY APPRAISED Residential , Residential Income Property, Industrial , Office Buildings, and various residential and commercial vacant lots and parcels. Other appraisal activities have been in the realm of reviewing both F.D.O .T. staff and fee appraisals on Interstate Highways I-95 and I- 595 . The review function was to correlate and reconcile between two appraiser' s value estimates and recommend to the Department Just Compensation . Have also performed detailed analysis of parcels before and after values, along with severance damage studies. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Registered Real Estate Broker , Florida License #0193605 ■ N. National Association of Realtors Senior Member, American Society Of Appraisers Candidate, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, R-830218 PROPOS I--{CD BARI-TOOT _BEACH PARK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CON( II;PTUAL SITEI; PLAN PREPARED BY THE CONSERVANCY INC. AND COWER COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION DEPT I' - ' I EROW- EASTERN RIGHT-OF-WAY WROW- WESTERN RIGHT-OF-WAY 1) NORTH CANOE TRAIL PARKING (UNPAVED) CCCL- COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE 2) NORTH NATURE TRAIL PARKING (UNPAVED) MHWL- MEAN HIGH WATER LINE 3) NORTH BEACH PARKING (PAVED) U- UPLAND 4) CENTRAL BEACH PARKING (PAVED) W- WETLAND 5) BEACH BATH HOUSE OW- OPEN WATER ‘( 6) SOUTH NATURE TRAIL PARKING (UNPAVED) OX NO(K BOUNDPR 7) SOUTH BEACH PARKING (PAVED) ApPR 8) SOUTH CANOE TRAIL PARKING (UNPAVED) 9) OBSERVATION TOWER MANGROVE WETLAND 10/11) BAY OVERLOOKS ,. PRESERVE 12) TRAILS AND SCATTERED PICNIC TABLES 13) DUNE CROSSOVER fri 14) WETLAND BOARDWALK .... 4 � 15) DUNE PR❑TECTI❑N FENCE (NO ACCESS U , W ' EXCEPT CROSSOVERS) S �.•• ' .00040 '¢`• op ."..• ...7_,<4.00A J _ / ,.,+P^~ - pZ10N ZINC '/ w+'"' .� ESER� I//•('it) U2) S ��_' DUNE pg , ` E , ..,e _ JP-tION %~~ NOTE. THIS CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN COMPLIES WITH THE n., `_- i ;i// SPIRIT OF THE LELY BAREFOOT BEACH LAWSUIT AGREEMENT lug ;i' JL 1_ %'- SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS AND STIPULATIONS. re SCALE. 1'= 100' ,acNS.. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A $4, 277. 33 CHANGE ORDER FOR INSTALLATION OF PLAY EQUIPMENT AT NORTH NAPLES COMMUNITY PARK Objective : To obtain approval of a $4, 377. 33 change order for the installation of play equipment at North Naples Community Park Considerations: On May 7, 1985 the Board of County Commissioners established a policy stating that any change orders over $2, 000 for construction of the community parks would require Board approval. Change order # 10 for McGovern Construction - Sitework Furnishings in the amount of $4. 377. 33 is for the following: 1. Pickup and deliver play structure to park site. 2. Install Timberform play structure as per specifications of the manufacturer. This change order comes at the request of the Parks and Recreation Department upon reviewing construction specifications, liability considerations and feasibility of the on site contractor' s price to install said equipment, the contractor is familiar with construction of play structures and could erect the equipment in a safe and timely manner. This item was not in the original contract as park maintenance personnel were to erect the play equipment. The park maintenance personnel would take longer to install this equipment and other areas of work would lag because of the time restrictions. This change order, upon review of price for installation has been recommended by both the consulting engineers of Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soil and Peek, Inc. and the County Engineering Department. On April 9th the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board ( PARAB) approved the chance order. This change order will increase the present amount of McGovern Construction from $251, 429. 51 to $255, 806. 84. Fiscal Impact : This change order in the amount of $4, 377. 33 is to be paid out of fiscal year 1986/87 budget. Monies are available to cover this change order in account 306-113-6383-6310, Parks and Recreation CIP North Naples Community Park. Recommendation : Staff and PARAB recommends the approval of this change order. Prepared by: ,z4 ti. Date: 3-87 Murdo Smith Park Superintendent Reviewed by: Date: Cliff Crawford Parks and Recreation Director Reviewed by: Date: Kevin O' Donnell Public Services Administrator MS: pc RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER FOR FINAL PAYMENT OF PAVING AT GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY PARK - SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD IN THE AMOUNT OF $2, 171. 60 Objective : To obtain approval for a change order for final payment to APAC - Florida, Inc. in the amount of $2, 171. 60 for paving at Golden Gate Community Park. Considerations: The contract that was awarded for paving of Golden Gate Community Park was a unit price contract for estimated quantities for subgrade, base course and paving. This change order for final measurement of paving is due to the amount of time that transpired between the initial subgrade and base course installation and final paving. As a result of the delay the base course and subgrade were in need of repair, prior to the final paving. With the contract being issued as a unit price of estimated quantities, some final quantities were also less than the estimated quantities. The final change order for APAC - Florida, Inc. is for as-built quantities upon completion of the contract, as measured by the Collier County Engineering Department and the consulting engineers, Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll and Peek, Inc. The County Engineering Department and the consulting engineers have certified the quantities to be true and recommend the approval of this change order. This will increase APAC - Florida, Inc. ' s contract from $78, 631. 48 to $80,803. 08. * The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board ( PARAB> approved the change order at their meeting of .-_ _ _ _ 9t .. Fiscal Impact : This chance order of 62, 171. 60 is to be paid out of the 1986/37 fiscal year. Adequate monies are available to cover this change order in account 306-113-6382-6310, Parks and Recreation Capital Improvement, Golden Gate Community Park. Recommendation : Staff and PARAB recommend approval of this change order. Prepared by: ` v, u Date: �3' Murdd Smith Park Superintendent Reviewed by: Date: Cliff Crawford Parks and Recreation Director Reviewed by: Date: Kevin O' Donnell Public Services Administrator t" tr1 Z: to 3 N t" t•1 Z: CI S H C" trs l7 3 co z co w X w 0 CD C r X Co co Co n r• X w ID Co r•-• .Z.. rt r0 n 1-1 7c• CD r+ n II N .. Co r+ n n r X , "� Z(D ft. n r /D ID CD ID n •• ID ( (D D P-••• 00 n v CO < v n v CO < r+ n v W 7D w rt 0 ID Cr. (D w n 0 Pb C" 0 w r' C rt I+ rt n n rr r• rr rt n µ rt fD Q+ 0. 0 C o `< `< 3 C O •< `< 'C c 0 `< `< 3 r D n 0 0 H n 0 O 0 0 rn - ID m r r I'D CO m CD 9 9 N rn r r (aD I t" O co 9 8 I-' N (D (D 9 9 1--, 3 2 O co ea 0 n (D +. CCi (D fD O C - I O ry/ -, 1-" (D N b DC O m a CD rt. m m w (D co Cy Co n a " 6o o r+ r' J 0 0 y rr r+ r• n ID Co w o- 1•-' r r k A \ ;....N. .,,,..,1.... 1.1t Itil : t. , t .:. .,,, r �v I 07 0 iii a N r m I w • n 'C CD Co to , Ti_t . �� -‘--':'1.' ` N 'k el R• a o 0 \-!--.- n p km I I I 7 C • 0 0. C C r• m• n�y iZ.: ID.i 9n R w n • • 1 to Q n O 0 0 W l.) U GOD OD p ( �_\ � .(11 o a o w Q C 't e t N N r s I f o a n! r to E C, 3 w r X CD I'D w w $ m o r t >E CJ 3 ,-. *-. X Co CD Co rt n n r X E i Z I-, X p fD m rt n rt r Cr. a' fD fD n r• CD 7 D Z rt n 0 r x fD CD rt r tD r rt b Co < CD f 2 to fD fD n r• CD F-• n '0 CO < Co rt 0 CD a+ fD n 'O CO < O w rt 0 CD G+ H rt r• r+ rY r r CO rt 0 CD CP p n P• rt n n C 0 `< `< 3 $ 7 D 0 r 0 rt QO C O `< `< 3 C n 0 0 H i •-1 -4 0 0 `< `< 3 r4 0 O 0 fD N rt rt 0. n I-1 0 0 ft O m rt n 0. X w r (D C ! to CD N rt rt 0. 11 1+ r+ tD CO co B B r-' 0 0 )-- r (D Co fD 8 B r r+ 0 (D fD iC' > (D B B r f.. 0 fD CO CD 0 ea CO > \ 1 O CD CD H. I0' to 0 0 0 i r Cl O f.7 N Cl i In '0 m 7 fD ! co to °f fD W 0. i CO Oa fD d CD . V fD O. W (D of V) i • fD re 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 CD rt n rt co 0 Co 7 D 0 Co ✓ r 7 1-1 i! i ! i ! i A i i (\ \tiryT i s, i 'Q i i ! i ! ! f i ! f f i i r sp,, f ,.., y, k> o 0 i m i f It o i :::-( Cc n p 0 ; i co O i 1 I y c°..... .i Co rri 1:11:0 1 i c r).' > CD c ; r, ti • . is"N \tU o u R 8 M A 4 O G' N -a H H Z CI co 0 H r Ni E o a c - -4 N r .- X w ro w N _ a rr n N r 7c' r n A w rr n co 2+ r O S -I n 0 '< << o Ni — Cr' CD y rt r t 0. n O r'- •-• co w Z Ni 0 9 9 rD r 1- . 1 .O n ea n. C r n - ro .r 0 ~ cc w N CD CO 00 = rD v CD Ni 0. Z w n H 0 co r* Co w n - 0 k 1 y O O Q --1 n r r �O `O m V CO \I v w CD v •t F f(� M 1 �1 3 co 0 0 � n q t, „, NI ....,:\:, ,,t ..\ NI 1:: ik S 0 h 1\ O Q .-• — N 0 RI r"' [+f E t 3 (n t-' C•f t e) 3 - C-• CO L C7 3 0o Z O F- X CO CD CO E r X w (D co n r- X CO CD CO = ,•..( n n H F-+ 7r fD n n Cl F-+ 7c CO n n H 1-, 7c ~: Z CD CD n N• o CD fD (C Cl F- CD n CD CD p1 r- CD O H t w < 'O n 'co co < n H 't7 w < 7� C w rt b to on to w n C] fD th 0 w n J (D (?' ■.• O C. rt F` n H H rt r- rt H Cl rt F'- n n c. C 0 `< `< 3 C 0 `C 'G 3 C 0 << `< 3 r+ --d H CD 0 H H d 0 n C o 7 r„ fD (o rt rt 0. 7' CD to n rt C. (D N n n C]. (A 0 fD 9 9 I. N mo CD 9 9 I-' co fD 9 9 `--' 3 n CD fD q, 7' n (D (D +a C CD CD 0 W f F, to r n a to 0 H 0 0 H In d CD (D (p m Co CV CC. CC. CC. V N n n n (D o 0 o w .J C N C) f) F-. 1--' h, n yjv... • c o m Q Q r t • ro • w 7c m MI 11116 a C I-'- v 9 t 0 n 1 ■ e If :1 N 0 a,■ a I I I I .. C C. N• (A H i fD °' (o 9 n (' w n F+ tG i` fD M CL CL ■ n O o LO lo r CD• CO "J• V O. n Co fJ F..1 r-+ O C7 . N M M C C7 Z W X D1 fD W w m O if M t+ X Da NZ �_ �"° X N CD DC et n n --• x et 0 M 1-+ x (D (9 n r fD H fD !D n < fD 7 .... --d fD (D ry W (D H. n V D1 < d N p m f1+ O w et C (D R+ H rwr r n n 10-• Cr C 0 `< Ott C 0 `< `C Z C Cl C 0 H S et 0 �C Z Cl C 0 n f9 co rt rt a Cl H —( ° rt fD N rt ft 0 X' m c m(D m ft t °. n DC DC II 1—. n p A� b M (BD CD r b N CDD H N n O CD q, x1 Z lo `cwt n In--' "` II O~ CD ....... 1 O m co° Cl C n N no a co 01 t to to co G7 V (D fD (A N rt fD ft t 0 O CD Ort n n et , ° m n ')t3 DC D' (' D i k,,,\I , o � � . v o 1 n A CO 4 m o CO v CD n x m M d C 1-, Q a ro DC n •F .r. lL U 1. l I I I I I. f w o C- N -v ..n y .3 0 m 0 co ca 0 s c�C ? H r --I 1 9 I-• X d ro DC r z 3 r r 11 n N F .. CI•• "+11 CD ^O DC < H C A r r, r H °' -.-1 c p `e 0 r m 0 r CD N r r o. Cl o r � I-- rD N Z o n fD rD " w r C r co U -iv H H 0 d Cl y CO OP b Cl v (D 3 CD Z ° r w - 0 (D r d co n k.....: \I l o at, it t. t .k''':' l'N.:k\s' —I %ft :111:1 rn Co ( 0 ro Co CD v Cl F y (Cl C 1-- 0 CD r ( I 1 . I . o 1 MEMORANDUM, TO: Dan Monaco, PARAB Chairman Ron Burton, PARAB Vice-chairman Charles Stevens Scott McQuillin FROM: Cliff Crawford, Parks and Recreation Director L DATE: March 20, 1987 SUBJECT: April PARAB meeting Please be advised that the April meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will be held on the second Thursday, April 9th instead of the third Thursday, April 16th. Please make the appropriate changes on your calendar. If you have any items for the agenda, please notify this office by Tuesday, March 31st. CC: pc cc: Kevin O' Donnell, Public Services Administrator 4: l' I Q 0'"' WILSON • MILLER • BARTON • SOLL & PEEK, INC. N•Mr• MEMORANDUM DATE : May 13 , 1987 TO: Clifford Crawford, Director Collier County Parks and Recreation Department FROM: Robert E. Furlong5 ^ Wilson , Miller, Barton, Soil & Peek, Inc. SUBJECT: Collier County Community Parks Update Summary GOLDEN GATE Status : Open IMMOKALEE Status : Open --+ • e"' WILSON • MILLER • BARTON • SOLL & PEEK, INC. NORTH NAPLES Status : Under Construction Park open June 4 , 1987 Contracts Status 1. BP1 - Site Preparation 100% complete (Harper Bros. , Inc. ) 2. BP2 - Site Electric 100% complete 3. BP3 - Buildings and Shelters 99% complete - remaining work: (Bunn Construction, punch items Inc. ) 4. BP4 - Sitework Finishes 99% complete - remaining work : (McGovern Construction punch items Corp. ) ,., 5. BP5 - Outdoor Game Courts 100% complete (McGovern Construction Corp. ) 6. BP6 - Paving * 99% complete - remaining work : (MacAsphalt , Inc. ) wheel stops and striping WILSON • MILLER • BARTON • SOLL & PEEK, INC, MARCO ISLAND Status : Under construction. Park open June 5, 1987 Contracts Status 1 . BP1 - Sitework and Paving 95% complete - remaining work: (Better Roads , Inc . ) fine grade and punch items 2. BP2 - Buildings and Site 95% complete - ready for. Electric substantial completion inspection (Mollenhauer , Inc. ) remaining work : punch items 3. BP3 - Landscaping and 75% complete - remaining work : Irrigation sod and misc. plantings (Sunny Grove Landscaping Inc. ) EAST NAPLES Status : Army Corps of Engineers permit has been received. South Florida Water Management District permit in process of staff review. _ Design efforts are in progress . Estimated Bid Date : June 23 , 1987 Estimated Begin Construction: September 1 , 1987 Estimated Completion Date : June 1 , 1988 -21423 328/ 2. Vehicular Access to An Arterial With Level of Service (b) "C" or Better (20 points possible) Directly Adjacent 20 Within 1 mile via collector having a level of service "c" or better 15 Greater than 1 mile via collector having a level of service "c" or better 10 Less than 2 miles via local roads 5 3. Water Supply (15 points possible) Central system 15 Private well 2 4. Sewer Service (15 points possible) Central system 15 Septic Tank 2 5. Fire Protection (10 points possible) (c) Within fire district with level of service "7" or better and within 3 road miles of fire station 10 Within fire district with level of service "7" or better and more than 3 road miles from a fire station 6 Within a fire district with level of service "8" to "10" and within 3 road miles of a fire station 4 Wthin-a- re-a.-str}et-w th-Ievel-a€-servee 2811-to-"€8" 2 6. Access to Public Schools (d) (15 points possible) Within 1 mile of existing school linked by improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 15 Within 1 mile of existing school without improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 12 Between 1-2 miles of existing school linked by improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 9 Between 1-2 miles of existing school without improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 6 7. Submission of Project As A Planned Unit Development 5 (5 points possible) 8. Neighborhood Parks (e) (10 points possible) Beel eatien-er-payment-}n-Iiet:-theree€-€er ne€ghherheee-perk-sites-eneer-€ae±lit es 10 Rev.3 Rev.5 29 Provisions of a neighborhood park with facilities. ***** (f) points possible) 9. Affordable Housing 100% of project provides affordable rental housing 20 }87 Asher f0-pa4nts-peee}hte4- Apea-te-3esr4-a€-6eenty-6emm ee ewers dseretiee-€er-dereepere-te-ept-to-eemmt te-prevde-=sei44t ee - snd-er-eeeh-€er €aerie}es-net-epee}€ieelIy- deat}€ied ea-the-previees-eriteris- DENSITY TABLE DENSITY ALLOWED IN URBAN AREA POINTS SCORED (UNITS/ACRE) 90-100 Maximum permitted under Zoning Ordinance for requested zoning category 85- 89 a maximum of 8 80- 84 " " 7 75- 79 " It " 6 70- 74 " 5 60- 69 " " " 4 50- 59 II 3 40- 49 " " 2 30- 39 " " 1 0- 29 .5 Footnotes a For reference a listing of developed community shopping centers for which points may be awarded is available from the Planning/ Zoning Department. This listing will be updated as new facilities are developed. b Points will be awarded for access to arterial and collector roadways that are listed in Table 2, Principle Roadway System or described in Section II, C of the Transportation Element and are existing or approved and funded in the five (5) year work program. Where collectors and/or arterials do not exist or currently operate at a level of service below "c", credit may be given for such roadways provided the petitioner commits to constructing the improvements necessary to provide level of service "c" or better. The extent of the necessary improvement would be determined by the County Transportation Department. Rev.3 Rev.5 30 ** A-dare}epee-may-apt-te-tied eete-a-€€re-statlen-site-to-the- e-Distriet-er-sa-egttent-essh-tienatien-were-eapita - imprevements-ere- neemplete-et-the-€ire-statien-prej-eeted-te- ser e-te-deve;apex=s-s.ite--- -the-D#re-Dstr}et-aeeepts-the- ste-er-the-each-egttivelent-€er-the-eenstretlen-a -e-staten; the-deve€epee-may-be-awarded-3-pe nts7 c *** A developer may provide an assessment for the cost of fire protection which may include land dedication for a fire station site or a cash payment where capital facilities are necessary. If the assessment is acceptable to the Fire District the developer may be awarded 10 points. The assessment will be due to the Fire District upon issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. d *** A developer may opt to dedicate a site for a public school to the County School Board or an equivalent cash donation where capital improvements are incomplete at the school site projected to serve the developer's site. If a developer chooses one of these options, the proposed public school site or donation would have to be approved by the County School Board. If a developer chooses to dedicate a site or cash equivalent to the County School Board and if the County School Board accepts the site or cash equivalent only for a school site, the developer may be awarded 8 points. In addition, those projects with medical features such as life care facil- ities, retirement communities with health care facilities and adult congregate living facilities receive the full 15 points. *=** Optimal;-te-}mpement-th}s-pregrem- he-Eel;ler-Eettety-perks anti-Reereaten-Ad*ai eery-;earti-mill- e-desgnated-es-the-bedy-te- eversee-this-preeedtte----Ttte-Ad-,Asery-Beard-ja -review-e l tttttre-res4entlal-resenes-e€-188-unts-er-mere- er-eempl anee faith-the- ellew ng-er}feria- 1----8r}ter}e---:X11-resldeatel-develepmens-e€-188-ttnits-er- mere-seal;-be-regttired-te-eentribttte-aeeepteble-nelghber- heed-park-€eeilties---lhe-1888-6enstts-€ get.e-a€-;T; persens-per-hettseheld-4hettsing-ttnit1-will-be-used-te- errlve-et- he-fetal-papa}at en-€er-tkte-prepesed-devel- epment---A-develepment-e -188-units-wth-an-est}mated pepttleten-a -?€8-wettld-begn-te- mpaet-open-the-perk- €eel;ites- n-the-area-anti-ereate-en-atid4t€anal-need---}he standar4-11se4-€er-determinlag-the-neeeseery-perk-reT4re meats-is-e-neighberheed-park-is-;-aeres-per-1;888-pepts- latien- 2 ---Site-Dedeet}ea-&-8eleeten-8r}ter4et €-the-develeper-eheeses-te-deeieete-land- er-e-perk-site the-€elewrig-ertere-regarti#ng-the-seeeten-e€-that ste-mast- e-met.---Alse;-the-site-watt}ti-be-deeded-te-the eenty;-whe-wettlti-then-be-respensble- el!-the-mantenanee e€-the-site7 Rev.3 Rev.5 31 S to-3e=eat}en- er-Ne}ghberheed-3atks a----The-e+te-meet-be-e-m mem-a€-t€}-eent+.geees-aeree b----Wmere-pass+1,1e;-€t-sltee14-fie- eeete4-ee}eeeat-te-aa e.4.ementery-sehee ; e. The-a te-meet- e-se#tabe- er-teereet efts=-et-park-ese-and eapab4e-e€- mmed ate-deveepment-er-eeveIepee-at-e-meteaI 1- -sgreee-epee-t}me; d. tee-s€te-meet- e-elAtabIy-ieeetee-wi-tit-respeee-te-te serreene ftg-ee e?epments-that- t-serves;-ene e----J}teat-seeeee-eennet-ee-te-e-read-eyass ee-es-en-erter- e?-er- ager- 3----Pe meney-;e-TAee-e€-Be44eat;eft--- -s-dee4:eper-se-eheeses ene-;t- s-sgreeab?e-te-the- eare-e€-6eent -€emm ee enets; et- 4-tee-3eere-e€-Eeenty-6emm ee eners-deem- t- s-#n-the- 6eeneyle-e eat-€aterest;-peements-may-ee-aeeegtee-to-e ee- e€-Ieae-eeeeet}efts---The-payments-ca �1-be-eesee-ea-the- €e r-merhet-vel-ee-e -the-emeent-a€- and-te-ee-eed eetee- The-€err-market- a3ee-w 11-ee-eeterm nee-et-the-ti-me-e€ the-rage}red-eee€eetlen---The-€air-market- a€ee-mess-ee ' eased-eft-the-bane-€n-the-�mmed�ate-area-e€-the-eeve�ep- meat--- €-e-eeveIeper-eees-net-agree-pa th-the-emeent err}vee-et- y-the-Eeeftty;-the-eeveleper-may-ee±eat-end-4e his-awn-e4ependent-eppre eal--- he-Eeenty-may-case-the fteepen4ent-eppra€se4-velee- €-they-se-eheese- The-men+es-ee eeted-she}4-be-he?d-€e-e-treat-and-meat-be f=ghty-eermerkee--- he-meney-pe}e-ey-e-ee e?eper-meat-be cased- er-the- mme4 ate-needs-e€-the-tee+dents-e€-that deve?epment-er-€er-}mprevement-e€-ether-e: }sti-eg-paths wh€eh-elreeey-serve-these-needs.---; -the-meney- s-ftet- spent-ca th}n-see+en-yeere- t-w - e-€erwereee-to-the- Bepertment-e -nark.s-efte-Reereat en-genera-eperet}ng- bedget---?he-meney-cast-be-eeIeetee-ey-the- eerd-e€ Geeftty-Gemm+sa€eners- 4----Pee•ieetiens-and-payments---Ift-same- nstenees- eth-lend- ded�eetene-and-payments-may-be-eeeepted-by-tile-6eenty- Thie-may-eeeer- €-a-me±et-pert en-e -e-site-has-eIree4y- been-eege4re4- e----Gree t---;n-same-}nstaneee -pr vate-reereetene.1-€ael- t es-w th4n-e-develepment-may-be-erect}tad-tewer4e-the- reYe4ree-dedleat eft---This-erec t-eennet-eaeeed-;i9;-e€ the-rage red-eereege-to-be-dad+eated- e----Types-a€-€eei-? t es-eI g bye-€er-erect tat }}---Water-re.iate4-eeelt4t#es; Rev.5 32 4}---6reap-€am #y-p#en e-areas; 3}---6e1€-eearses; 4}---Playgrennds-4tet-lets}; €}---Peereat anal-eenter; 64.---8hn€ lebeard4herseshee-eearts; }---8w mm#ng-peels; S}---Tenn#streeeaetball-eenrts; 9}---Tra 41-9-41terse;-j-egg 4ng--124eyele} 4.84---8thers---Baeh-te-be-appreve4-by-the-Parks-end-Pee rear#eft-Adv#sexy-Beard- b----Pereentage-a€-Grad t-Allewed- Pereentage-Gredlt Member-e€ Allewed Pae ?#- es-Prey dad l9; 9--er-mere 4875 €--8 38; €--b 29; 4 g; 3 e. l -a-developer-eheeses-te-be-ered#tad- er-pr#vate-reere- at#anal-€ae#1 t#es;-the-pr#vase-€ee#1# #es-mast-be-e#early Points will be awarded if a developer provides in accordance with this section a neighborhood park with recreational facilities within a residential development. The park site must be identified on the development site plan and plat, if appropriate. Assurance shall be given, in the form of subdivision deed restrictions, condominium declaration, homeowners agreements, or maintenance agreements that the neighborhood park and facilities are legally-aeeepreb4e-te-the-Bear4-a€-6eanty-6emm#ss#eners after-review-end-appreval-by-the-6ennty-atterney-that-the areas shall be adequately maintained.-and-that-ell-heme ewners-er-tenants-shall-be-repo ed-te-beeng-to-and- Wane#ally-sappert-the-eperat en-and-ma#etenanee-e€-sa#d €ae#1#t#es- The-rema#n}ng-aereage-raga#red-shall-be-dad eared-te-the 6ennty-#n-terms-e€-a-park-site-er-a-payment-#n-l en-e€ ded eat#en- 33 The standard used for determining neighborhood park requirements is 2 acres of park with facilities per 1,000 population. A residential development will be required to provide a neighborhood park with facilities at the standard outlined above based on the estimated population of the development. Eeiew}eg-ere-ehe-tkree-seeps-esee- n-deeermng-ehe-emesat-e€-aereage er-payment-;n-les-eeree=1- The procedure and critieria for determining required park acreage and facilities is as follows: Step 1: Estimated development population Number of population estimated dwelling units X per dwelling = development in the development unit population Example: 500 2_5* 1,250 Step 2: Estimeteei Pee4e4-€ee€€ities Required park acreage Development acres of acres of population X facility = recreational (expressed in needed per facility needed r thousands) 1,000 persons for the development Example: 1.25 2 2.5 Step-31.--Estimate- ees Aeres-e€-reeeetenel land fee-€er-eke ae4lity-xeedee X eege€siten 4e eiepment er-the-deelopment eests-per acre The recreational facilities provided will be those facilities normally associated with a neighborhood park such as but not limited to the following: baseball field, basketball/volleyball court, children's playgrounds, fitness station trails, football fields, neighborhood pool, picnic pavilion, racquetball court, shuffleboard court, soccer field, softball field, tennis court, tot lot and other active or passive recreational facilities. The types and number of facilities will be in scale with the size and function of the neighborhood park. The Parks and Recreation Department has _prepared a listing of recreational facilities and county-wide standards for service based on population which may be used as a guideline in determining the amount of facilities required. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will review rezones providing neighborhood parks with facilities to determine that the park is well designed and includes appropriate facilities for the size and capacity of the park and the population it is intended to serve. * 1980 Census - 2.5 persons per household Rev.3 Rev.5 34 ISLE OF CAPRI PARK MAINTENANCE A. PURPOSE - It is the intent of this policy to insure a standard of maintenance of park land or open space for the Isle of Capri. The park lands in question are six lots, that are basically low visitation and undeveloped areas along the right-of-way in Isle of Capri. These lands are considered open space areas. 1. Definition - Any unimproved tract, parcel or piece of land presently owned or leased by the County, which land shall be maintained primarily in a natural state. Level of maintenance - The level of service the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department will provide for park lands or open space at Isle of Capri. B. AREAS TO BE MAINTAINED - Only those areas under the jurisdiction of . the Parks and Recreation Department. This is based upon ordinances of Collier County and does not pertain to road median or right-of-way maintenance and any deviation from this would require Board of County Commission action. Median Improvements: By Board of County Commission direction areas of Collier County, namely, Golden Gate and Marco Island have been assessed a special tax for improved median landscape and maintenance. Any deviation from this policy would require Board of County Commission approval. C. LEVEL OF MAINTENANCE - Moderately low level, usually associated with low level of development, low visitation and undeveloped areas. 1. Turf care - Normally cut one time every seven ( 7) to ten ( 10) days or less, seasonal conditions dictate mowing frequency. Reseeding or resodding done only when major bare spots appear. Low growing grasses may not be mowed. Generally mowed and edged to ensure grasses and weed areas do not become objectionable to area residents. 2. Fertilization - only areas that have established sod, approximately one ( 1) or two ( 2 ) times per year. 3. Irrigation - None 4. Litter control - Once per week or less, use shall dictate service level . Containers serviced. 5. Pruning - No regular trimming. Usually performed one time per year. Safety or damage from weather may dictate actual work schedule. a err 6. Special Features: Minimum maintenance to allow safe use. This is the level of service the Parks and Recreation Department recommends for the park land at Isle of Capri. This level was obtained from Park Maintenance Standards Manual of the National Parks and Recreation Association. MS: pc 5/ 15/87 a 1 ,887 7/2 E M O R A N D U M TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Commissioner Max A. Hasse, Jr. , Chairman SUBJECT: Naming Golden Gate Neighborhood Park in Golden Gate City DATE: March 30, 1987 I have received a request from several people in Golden Gate regarding the naming of the neighborhood park on 23rd Lane S.W. after Mr. Aaron Lutz , the former Principal of the Golden Gate Elementary School. Mr. Lutz had served as Principal since the opening of the school until his death last week, and was highly regarded in the community. I have requested that the residents contact all the civic and fraternal organizations in Golden Gate to ask for their input. We should be hearing from these organizations very shortly in regard to naming the park the Aaron"=Lutz�Neighborhood Park .00' & fp Aide A Max A. Hasse , Jr. , d , irman MAH:ni cc: Neil Dorrill __ _. .. Kevin O' Donnell Clifford Crawford Ar i V