The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 03/19/1987 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA March 19, 1987 The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting will be held on Thursday, March 19, 1987 at 9: 00 a. m. on the 3rd floor of Building F ( rear of boardroom) of the Collier County Courthouse. I. Call to Order II. Approval of minutes of February 19, 1987 III. Additional items ( if necessary) IV. Old Business A. Update of community parks B. Discussion of future 1988 Comprehensive Plan V. New Business A. Request review of neighborhood parks dedication for Petition R86-24C - Pavilion Lakes B. Discuss Comprehensive Plan Amendment of current 1983 Comprehensive Plan C. Approval of pay request to Harper Brothers of $5, 701. 30 for increased quantity of paving at Immokalee Community Park D. Approval of Amendment of Professional Services Agreement of Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll and Peek, Inc. contract E. Approval to award Bid #1079 for bleachers for County parks in the amount of $7,960 F. Approval to award Bid #1078 for security alarm system at community parks maintenance facilities in the amount of $3,675 G. Discussion of staffing Immokalee and Golden Gate Community Parks H. Request approval to open bank accounts in Immokalee and North Naples I. Request approval to apply for Summer Food Grant in Immokalee during summer program J. Approval to award Bid #87-1068 Administrative Building VI. Adjournment INFORMATION CONCERNING AGENDA ITEMS Item IV. A. - Update of Community Parks An update of community park construction status will be discussed by a Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll and Peek representative. Update included in packet. Item IV. B - Discussion of future 1988 Comprehensive Plan An update of information provided to the C. A. C. by the Parks and Recreation Department will be given by Dan Loubier. Information included in packet. Item V. A - Neighborhood Parks Dedication Review of Pavilion Lakes PUD will be discussed by Barbara Cacchione, Planning Department . Information included in packet . Item V. B - 1983 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Discussion by Barbara Cacchione, Planning Department. Item V. C. - Approval of pay request to Harper Brothers of $5.701 .30 for increased quantity of paving at Immokalee Community Park Discussion by Murdo Smith. Information included in packet. Item V. D. - Approval of Amendment of Professional Services Agreement of Wilson . Miller . Barton . Soll and Peek . Inc . contract Discussion by Murdo Smith. Information included in packet. Item V. E. - Approval to award Bid #1079 for Bleachers for County parks in the amount of $7.960 Discussion by Murdo Smith. Information included in packet. Item V. F. Approval to award Sid #1078 for Security Alarm System at community parks maintenance facilities in the amount of $3.675 Discussion by Murdo Smith. Information included in packet. Item V. G. - Discussion of staffing Immokalee and Golden Gate Community Parks Marilyn McGinty will discuss the temporary staffing at the new community parks. Item V. H. - Request approval to open bank accounts in Immokalee and North Naples Marilyn McGinty will seek approval to open banking accounts in Immokalee and North Naples. These accounts will allow program staff to deposit program fees and light fees on a daily basis Item V. I . Request Approval to apply for Summer Food Grant in Immokalee during summer program Discussion by Dan Louber. Information included in packet. Item V. J. Approval to award Bid #87-1068 Administrative Building Discussion by Dan Loubier. Information included in packet. I DPL: pc Parks and Rec I I February 19 , 1987 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board met on this date at 9 : 00 A.M. in Building "F" of the Courthouse Complex, East Naples, Florida , with the following mem- bers present: CHAIRMAN: Dan Monaco VICE-CHAIRMAN: Ron Burton Charles Stevens Scott McQuillin ABSENT: Steve Price ALSO PRESENT: Beverly Kueter , Deputy Clerk; Clifford Crawford, Parks & Recreation Director; Murdo Smith, Parks & Recreation Supervisor; Dan Loubier , Parks & Recreation Department; Pat Cookson, Parks & Recreation Department Secretary. AGENDA I . Call to Order II. Approval of minutes of January 15, 1987 III . Discussion of Immokalee application to fill PARAB vacancy IV. Emergency Items ( if applicable) V. Old Business A. Discussion of Beach Fees and Alternatives B. Update of Community Parks C. Change Order at North Naples Community Park (ballfield sitework finishes) VI . New Business A. Discussion of Comprehensive Plan B. Approval of Bid #87-1070 for game court resurfacing Page 1 PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD FEBRUARY 19, 1987 C. Approval of Bid #87-1074 for parks brochure D. Discussion of grand openings : Immokalee and Golden Gate Community Parks . VII . Adjournment MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 1987 - APPROVED AS PRESENTED Mr. McQuillin moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried 4/0 , that the minutes of January 15, 1987 be approved as presented. PARAB VACANCY - MR. FRED THOMAS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Parks & Recreation Director Crawford stated that an applica- tion to fill the vacancy on the PARAB has been received from Mr . Fred Thomas of Immokalee. He stated that the requirements have been discussed with Mr . Thomas and Commissioner Goodnight has been very active in assisting to fill this vacancy. Mr. McQuillin moved, seconded by Mr. Burton and carried 4/0, that Mr. Fred Thomas be recommended for approval to fill the vacancy on the PARAB. PURCHASE OF FLOW METER FOR SEWER SYSTEM AT TIGERTAIL BEACH - RECOMMENDED APPROVAL Parks & Recreation Department Supervisor Smith advised that an emergency purchase of a flow meter for the sewer system at Tigertail Beach needs to be made. He stated that the Utilities Division of the County is going to design and install a sewer system at Tigertail Beach and a flow meter is needed which will allow Marco Island Utilities to compute the amount of sewage flowing through the system for billing purposes . He stated that the Utilities Division has recommended that the meter be purchased from Red & Associates, since it is the only flow meter which Marco Island Utilities allows to be used with their system. He said the cost of the meter is approximately $2 ,400 and the stainless steel cabinet is another $400 . 00 for a total cost of $2 , 800 . 00 . He advised there is a 6 to 8 week delivery time on the meter , which is why action needs to be taken quickly. In answer to questions, Mr . Smith stated that at the present time there is a septic system at Tigertail and during the season it needs pumping every weekend because of the overflow. Mr. Monaco moved, seconded by Mr. McQuillin and carried 4/0, to recommend approval that a flow meter and cabinet be purchased from Red & Associates at a total cost of $2,800.00. Page 2 PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD FEBRUARY 19 , 1987 DISCUSSION OF BEACH FEES AND ALTERNATIVES Parks & Recreation Director Crawford stated that the beach fee proposal was presented to the Board of County Commissioners and it was directed that alternatives be studied. He stated that during the past week Staff has come up with 9 different options and Staff is now in the process of modifying the report and 5 options will be listed. Mr . Crawford stated that Staff is going to recommend a permit system, parking fees , and elimination of all admission fees to the beaches and, additionally, admission fees will be eliminated at Tigertail Beach on February 21, 1987. He stated that fees from zero to $1. 50 per car per day are being studied, as well as revenues vs. expenses are also being studied. Mr . Crawford noted that the Board of County Commissioners indicated that maybe a beach tax option could be pursued. He stated they are trying to determine the amount of revenues that would be generated by this option. He stated that Staff will recommend that Resolution 82-138 be rescinded along with any other resolutions which may affect the beach policies. Mr . Crawford advised his personal opinion that staffing at Tigertail will have to remain because of the parking situation, and it is optional in other areas. Mr . Crawford stated that the Board of County Commissioners requested that Staff return in four weeks. In answer to Mr . Burton, Mr . Crawford stated that one of the options brought up at the meeting was adding $1. 00 to County Taxes for the beaches . He noted that there are approximately 146 , 000 property owners in the County and City. He noted that the Board of County Commissioners will have to make a decision as to whether they would like the beaches to be an enterprise account or whether they want to subsidize the beaches. He added that the whole issue is one of philosophy. Mr . Crawford stated that if there are issues of this type in the future, he would like to see the PARAB initiate public hearings and actually get the public input prior to sending recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. Mr . Monaco stated that no one anticipated the reactions received on this issue. In answer to Mr . Stevens, Mr . Crawford stated that PARAB ' s meetings are advertised. Mrs. Cookson stated that agendas are placed in the press boxes for every meeting. Page 3 PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD FEBRUARY 19 , 1987 UPDATE ON COMMUNITY PARKS Parks Services Coordinator Loubier stated both the Golden Gate and Immokalee Parks are open and minor shake-down and warranty work is continuing. He stated that the estimates for additional work needed at the North Naples Park have been received and the ballfield estimate is pretty close to Staff ' s estimate, however , the estimate for additional work on the site, was double that of Staff ' s estimate. He noted that the estimated completion date has been extended to June and Staff is attempting to obtain a second cost estimate. He stated that the original contract for site preparation, site electric, buildings and shelters, and outdoor game courts are essentially complete. He said the remaining work involves sitework finishes, paving, and negotiated extra work. In answer to Mr . McQuillin, Mr . Loubier explained that the June completion date is based on the fact that some of the work is still in negotiations. Parks & Recreation Director Crawford explained that when additional work is added to a contract, the contractor must be allowed more time to complete the contract, even if that extra time is not needed. Mr . Loubier reported that the Marco Island Park is still on schedule and may be ready before the North Naples Park. He stated that the East Naples Park is in about the same position as it was at the last update. He said if everything goes well, construction could begin in May, 1987. In answer to Mr . Monaco, Mr . Loubier stated that the North Naples site is roped off because it is a construction site and this reduces liability. CHANGE ORDER FOR $26,996.70 FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING ON ATHLETIC FIELDS AT NORTH NAPLES COMMUNITY PARK - RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Parks Services Coordinator Loubier stated that this change order is within the 10% discussed at the last meeting. Mr . McQuillin stated that this item should have been on the original RFP' s since it was known that this work needed to be done. He stated that the bulk of the change orders approved have been for the North Naples Park. He inquired if the County Attorney is checking to see if the County can be reimbursed for some of this cost? Mr . Loubier stated his understanding that there have been several meetings on this, however , Bunn Construction is insolvent and there won' t be any funds available to recoup damages from this company. He stated that he thinks the sub-contractors who performed work for Bunn, will be paid for the work they actually Page 4 PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD FEBRUARY 19, 1987 accomplished. Mr . Crawford stated that Bunn Construction is bonded, however , he does not know the status of the bond. REPORT ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Parks Services Coordinator Loubier stated that a year ago the Legislature approved a law that all municipalities and counties within the State of Florida must submit a 5-year Comprehensive Plan. He stated that everything that is included in the Comprehensive Plan which has been approved by all pertinent Advisory Boards must be funded and built or have a mechanism to fund the appropriate facilities . He said that in the past, Comprehensive Plans were thought of as a wish list and were never carried out. He said the Legislature is now making the Counties and Municipalities more responsible to the citizens . He advised that the penalties for not following the Comprehensive Plan are loss of revenue sharing monies , grants may be denied, etc. He said the Comprehensive Plan must be updated on an annual basis. Mr . Loubier stated that there is an element contained within the Comprehensive Plan called the Recreation and Open Space Element and a Capital Improvement Element. He stated that at the present time the Capital Improvement Element is being address by the Growth Management Coordinator and the Citizens Advisory Committee. He said this element includes parks and recreation, and in particular , the infrastructure needs of the department. Mr . Loubier stated that information will be submitted soon to the PARAB for review. He noted that the Department has put together an inventory of facilities necessary in Collier County ranging from marinas to regional parks to tennis courts, etc. He said the price on this list at the present time is approximately 43 million dollars . He stated that this list was requested by Mr . Randy Young, Consultant to Collier County for the Comprehensive Plan. Mr . Loubier stated there are 11 different elements to this Plan. He added that this element includes stan- dards of service, percentage of responsibility, etc. Mr . Loubier stated that in its present form, the list is a "wish list" as Staff does not expect the Board of County Commissioners to give Parks & Recreation 43 million dollars . He noted that the reason the price is so high is that Collier County is very deficient in parks and recreation facilities, and if nothing else, the report will show that Collier County is defi- cient. Parks & Recreation Director Crawford stated that without the percentage of responsibility factor , the price of the list is 110 Page 5 PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD FEBRUARY 19 , 1987 million dollars . He pointed out that it should be remembered that this is not a priority list, but rather just a basis from which to start . He advised that it may be necessary for the PARAB to meet with Growth Management Coordinator Fitzpatrick in a special meeting at a later date. Mr . Loubier added that the population figure being worked with is 156 , 000 and it should be kept in mind that the plan is for 1992 . He stated that Mr . Young will be working on the revenue sources for the plan. BID #87-1070 FOR GAME COURT RESURFACING - RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Parks & Recreation Department Supervisor Smith stated that Staff is attempting to complete maintenance on game courts. He stated that a priority list was compiled because it was felt the available funds of $19,700 would not be sufficient to resurface all the courts. He stated that the bids did come in higher at a total of $31, 163. 52 . Mr. Smith stated that the first priorities based on need are Golden Gate Park, Seagate Elementary School and Coconut Circle neighborhood park, at a cost of $21,784 .72 . He stated that the time frame involved is probably two months. Mr. Monaco moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried 4/0 to recommend approval for Bid #87-1070 to be awarded to U. S. Tennis and Fitness in the amount of $21,784 .72 . BID #87-1074 FOR PARKS BROCHURE - RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Parks & Recreation Program Director McGinty stated that bids have been received for a Parks Brochure from Naples Printing for 4 , 000 brochures at $2 , 400 . 00 , Morse Printing at $6 , 500 . 00 , and Collier County Printing at $1 , 916 . 00 . Mrs . McGinty recommended the bid be awarded to Collier County Printing . Ms . McGinty stated that the front of the brochure will con- tain a photograph of Bayview Park, black & white photos of the Community Parks will be located inside the brochure with maps indicating locations of all parks and recreation areas in Collier County. She stated that these brochures will be available upon request. Mr. Burton moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried 4/0 to recommend approval of Bid #87-1074 for Parks Brochure to be awarded to Collier County Printing in the amount of $1,916. 00 . Page 6 PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD FEBRUARY 19 , 1987 REPORT ON GRAND OPENING OF GOLDEN GATE AND IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY PARKS Parks & Recreation Director Crawford stated that the two grand openings were very successful. He stated that the opening at Golden Gate was delayed due to the Commission meeting being in progress. He stated the Staff did an excellent job and helped with cleanup at both parks. Mr . Crawford stated that the activity days at the Golden Gate Community Park were also very successful and in excess of 100 people attended each day. He stated the entire Staff was in attendance and there were a tremendous amount of activities . Mr . Crawford distributed momentoes of each of the grand ope- nings to the PARAB. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 10 : 20 A.M. PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Dan Monaco, Chairman Page 7 MEMORANDUM TO: The Parks Advisory Board FROM: Barbara Cacchione Planner III DATE: March 10, 1987 RE: Review of Rezone Petition R-86-24C, "Pavilion Lake", For Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Petition R-86-24C, "Pavilion Lake", is a request to rezone approximately 15 acres from C-4 and RMF-6 to PUD for a proposed development containing 180 multi-family dwelling units. The property is located north of the Pavilion Shopping Center on the west side of U.S. 41 in Section 33, T48S, R25E. It is within the Urban Future Land Use District. FINDINGS & ANALYSIS 0 In reviewing this petition for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, the project was rated using the Point Rating System to determine the availability of services and facilities and to establish a maximum density range. The density range achieved by this project is 0-4 units per gross acre. However, if the petitioner were to make necessary commitments to bring U.S. 41 to a LOS "C" at the intersection with Vanderbilt Beach Road, then the maximum density range achieved would be 0-8 units per gross acre. The petitioner has requested 12 units per gross acre in the PUD document. In order to comply with the Comprehensive Plan and achieve the density of 12 units per gross acre the petitioner proposes to use the option of a payment in lieu of land dedication for a Neighborhood Park. This option awards the petitioner 10 points and increases the density range to the maximum allowed under the Zoning Ordinance. The section of the Comprehensive Plan which discusses the Neighborhood Park option is attached for reference. i fro To determine the Neighborhood Park payment for the development the process outlined in the Comprehensive Plan on page 33 was used. Step 1: Estimate development population Number of Dwelling Units Population Per Estimated in the Development X Dwelling Unit = Development (proposed) Population 180 2.5 450 Step 2: Estimate needed facilities Development population acres of facility acres of (expressed in thousands) needed per 1,000 recreational persons facility needed for the develop- ment .450 2 .90 Step 3: Estimate fees (Payment in lieu of land dedication) Acres of recreational land fee for the facility needed for the X acquisition = development the development cost per acre .90 $90,000 $81,000 The land acquisition fee was determined by a market analysis conducted by Coastal Engineering Consultants. Their report, which is attached, has been reviewed by Pat Carroll of the Real Property Mangement Department. It is her opinion that the methodology used is an appropriate and acceptable method to determine the market value of the A property. If the Neighborhood Park payment is to be used, the PUD document must be amended with language inserted which states that the petitioner will make a payment to the Board of County Commissioners in the amount of $81,000 to be used for a neighborhood park. The petitioner must identify if any private recreational facilities within the development will be credited towards the required park dedication fee. If so, facilities shall be listed in the PUD document and shown on the site plan. Appropriate assurances must be given and reviewed by the County Attorney to ensure that the recreational facilities will be developed and maintained. The monies collected from the developer must be held in a trust and be earmarked for the immediate needs of the residents of that development or for improvement of other existing parks which already serve those needs. If the money is not spent within seven years it will be forwarded to the Department of Parks and Recreation general operating budget. The money will be collected by the Board of County Commissioners. This petition is scheduled for review by the Parks Advisory Board on March 19, 1987. The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) is tentatively scheduled to hear this petition on April 16, 1987, followed by the BCC. Through the annual amendment process, Planning Department staff has recommended that the Neighborhood Parks Option be deleted from the Point Rating System of the Comprehensive Plan. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan has been initiated and will be heard in a workshop before the CCPC on April 2, 1987. Review R-86-24C Pavilion Lake COLLIER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN B. Point Rating System / The point rating system is a primary mechanism in the implementation < of the Land Use Plan. The basic component of the point system is proximity to existing or proposed community services and facilities. Where distance from a facility is a factor, it is measured as a straight line directly from the facility to the anticipated entrance of the proposed project. Residential rezone petitions will be evaluated using all criteria in the point system. The total number of points received will be assessed according to the density table and a maximum allowable density will be identified. The final density approved for a project may be more or less than the maximum due do to other factors such as, but not limited to environmental constraints, compatability with surrounding land uses, location, and size of project. Commercial and industrial rezone petitions will be evaluated using an abbreviated version of the point system in conjunction with the Land Use Map. From the point system, commercial and industrial rezone petitions will be assessed using the access, water, sewer, fire and POD criteria. These five criteria add up to a possible maximum of 65 points. A commercial or industrial rezone petition must receive 40 points or more to be in compliance with the Plan. It is recognized that there are areas in the County whose current zoning has been declared in compliance with this Plan but could not currently pass the previously described tests. This might include residential zoning which allows a greater density than that permit- ted under the point rating system. In those cases, the subject property may be rezoned to another residential district at or below the previous district's density. Mixed use developments which were zoned prior to this Plan's adoption and which cannot meet the Plan's requirements may be rezoned to Planned Unit Development if the overall residential density remains the same or lower, and the acreage of other uses within the development (commercial, indus- trial, etc.) does not exceed previous amounts. All permitted principal and provisional uses identified in the Agricultural zoning districts as described in the most recent Collier County Zoning Ordinance shall be allowed in any land use designation of this Plan. The Point Rating System criteria are as follows: 1. Proximity to Commercial Node or Developed Community or Regional Commercial Use (15 points possible) Less than or equal to one mile 15 Greater than one mile & less than or equal to two miles 10 Greater than two miles & less than or equal to three miles 5 28 C . 2. Vehicular Access to An Arterial With Level of Service , C "C" or Better (20 points possible) Directly Adjacent 20 Within 1 mile via collector having a level of service "c" or better 15 Greater than 1 mile via collector having a level of service "c" or better 10 Less than 2 miles via local roads 5 . 3. Water Supply (15 points possible) Central system 15 Private well 2 4. Sewer Service (15 points possible) Central system Septic Tank 15 2 5. Fire Protection (10 ** ( points possible) Within fire district with level of service r "7" or better and within 3 miles of fire station Within fire district with level of service 10 (( "7" or better and more than 3 miles from a fire station Within a fire district with level of service 6 "8" to "10" and within 3 miles of a fire station 4 Within a fire district with level of service "8" to "10" 2 6. Access to Public Schools *** (15 points possible) Within 1 mile of existing school linked by improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 15 Within 1 mile of existing school without improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 12 Between 1-2 miles of existing school linked by improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 9 Between 1-2 miles of existing school without improved bicycle paths or sidewalks 6 7. Submission of Project As A Planned Unit Development 5 (5 points possible) 8. Neighborhood Parks**** (10 points possible) _, I. Dedication or payment in lieu thereof for neighborhood park sites and/or facilities • 10 29 Rev.3 ( . 9. Affordable Housing***** (20 oints p possible) -- ( 100% of project provides affordable rental housing 20 10. Other (5 points possible) Open to Board of County Commissioners 5 discretion for developers to opt to commit to provide facilities, land or cash for facilities not specifically identified on the previous criteria. DENSITY TABLE DENSITY ALLOWED POItiTS SCORED IN URBAN AREA (UNITS/ACRE) 90-100 Maximum permitted under Zoning Ordinance for requested 4:- zoning category 85— 89 a maximum of 8 80— 84 II 75— 79 7 —,(: „ " 6 70— 74 II: „ It 5 60— 69 II 4 - 50- 59 It „ „ 3 40— 49 II „ " 2 30— 39 It „ " 1 0— 29 " " " .5 Footnotes * Points will be awarded for access to arterial and collector roadways that are existing or approved and funded in the five (5) year work--program. Where collectors and/or arterials do not exist or currently operate at a level of service below "c", credit may be given for such roadways provided the petitioner commits to constructing the improvements necessary to provide level of service "c" or better. The extent of the necessary improvement would be determined by the County Transportation Department. ** A developer may opt to dedicate a fire station site to the Fire District or an equivalent cash donation where capital improvements are incomplete at the fire station projected to serve the developer's site. If the Fire District accepts the site or the cash equivalent for the construction of a station;' the developer may be awarded 3 points. 30 Rev.3 C (7 *** A developer may opt to dedicate a site for a public school to the County School Board or an equivalent cash donation where capital improvements are incomplete at the school site projected to serve the developer's site. If a developer chooses one of these options, the proposed public school site or donation would have to be approved by the County School Board. If a developer chooses to dedicate a site or cash equivalent to the County School Board and if the County School Board accepts the site or cash equivalent only for a school site, the developer may be awarded 8 points. In addition, those projects with medical features such as life care facil- ities, retirement communities with health care facilities and adult congregate living facilities receive the full 15 points. **** Optional; to implement this program the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will be designated as the body to oversee this procedure. The Advisory Board will review all future residential rezones of 100 units or more for compliance with the following criteria. 1. Criteria - All residential developments of 100 units or more shall be required to contribute acceptable neighbor- ( hood park facilities. The 1980 Census figure of 2.5 persons per household (housing unit) will be used to / arrive at the total population for the proposed devel- opment. A development of 100 units with an estimated population of 250 would begin to impact upon the park facilities in the area and create an additional need. The standard used for determining the necessary park require- ments is a neighborhood park is 2 acres per 1,000 popu- lation. 2. Site Dedication & Selection Criteria: If the developer chooses to dedicate land for a park site the following criteria regarding the selection of that site must be met. Also, the site would be deeded to the county, who would then be responsible for the maintenance of the site. Site Selection for Neighborhood Parks • a. The site must be a minimum of (5) contiguous acres; b. Where possible, it should be located adjacent to an elementary school; c. The site must be suitable for recreational or park use and capable of immediate development or developed at a mutual-. ly agreed upon time; l d. The site must be suitably located with respect to the surrounding developments that it serves; and e. Direct access cannot be to a road classified as an arter- ial or larger. 31 Rev.3 3. Payments-In-Lieu of Dedication - If a developer so chooses (7 "'41.10, and it is agreeable to the Board of County Commissioners, or if the Board of County Commissioners deem it is in the County's best interest, payments may be accepted in lieu of land dedications. The payments will be based on the fair market value of the amount of land to be dedicated. The fair market value will be determined at the time of the required dedication. The fair market value must be based on the land in the immediate area of the develop- ment. If a developer does not agree with the amount arrived at by the County, the developer may object and do his own independent appraisal. The County may use the independent appraised value if they so choose. The monies collected shall be held in a trust and must be tightly earmarked. The money paid by a developer must be used for the immediate needs of the residents of that development or for improvement of other existing parks which already serve those needs. If the money is not spent within seven years it will be forwarded to the Department of Parks and Recreation general operating budget. The money will be collected by the Board of County Commissioners. 4. Dedications and Payments - In some instances both land dedications and payments may be accepted by the County. This may occur if a major portion of a site has already been acquired. 5. Credit - In some instances, private recreational facil- ities within a development may be credited towards the required dedication. This credit cannot exceed 50% of the required acreage to be dedicated. a. Types of facilities eligible for credits: 1) Water related activities; 2) Group family picnic areas; 3) Golf courses; 4) Playgrounds (tot lots) ; 5) Recreational center; 6) Shuffleboard/horseshoe courts; 7) Swimming pools; 8) Tennis/racquetball courts; Isar 9) Trails (horse, jogging, bicycle) 10) Others - Each to be approved by the Parks and Rec- reation Advisory Board. 32 b. Percentage of Credit Allowed: Percentage Credit Number of Allowed Facilities Provided 50% 9- or more 40% 7- g 30% 5- 6 20% 4 10% 3 0% 0- 2 c. If a developer chooses to be credited for private recre- ational facilities, the private facilities must be clearly identified on the development site plan and plat, if appropriate. Assurance shall be given, in the form of subdivision deed restrictions, condominium declaration, homeowners agreements, or maintenance agreements that are legally acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners after review and approval by the County attorney that the areas shall be adequately maintained and that all home- owners or tenants shall be required to belong to and financially support the operation and maintenance of said facilities. The remaining acreage required shall be dedicated to the County in terms of a park site or a payment in lieu of 4, dedication. Following are the three steps used in determining the amount of acreage or payment in lieu thereof: Step 1: Estimate development population Number of population estimated dwelling units X per dwelling = development in the development unit population Step 2: Estimate needed facilities Development acres of acres of population X facility = recreational (expressed in needed per facility needed thousands) 1,000 persons for the development Step 3: Estimate fees Acres of recreational land fee for the facility needed X acquisition = development for the development costs per acre 33 ***** Optional; affordable rental housing the Planned Unit Development Distri ,iMul tp-Family Entry Level Rental Housing Areas, Section 7.27 f.6) of the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County as may be amended periodically. C C I 34 Rev.3 0 ' =x COASTAL ENGINEERING W. _ CONSULTANTS, INC. Development Consultants • Coastal Engineers • Marine Scientists Civil Engineers • Surveyors • Appraisal and Real Estate Consultants ` -o ..- , 3106 S. Horseshoe Dr. • P.O. Box 8306 • Naples, Florida 33941 • (813) 643-2324 March 9 , 1987 Ms . Barbara Cacchione Planning Department Collier County Government Center 3301 Tamiami Trail , East Naples , FL 33962 RE : Pavilion Lake ; Park Land Valuation Analysis CEC File No . 86 . 023 Dear Ms . Cacchione : In accordance with your request , I have made a market study and analysis of the above referenced property . The purpose of the study was to estimate the market value of the property , and allocate proportionate value to a hypothetical . 90 acre portion of the total site . This allocated value of N. the . 90 acre piece is to be utilized as the basis for a cash contribution to Collier County in lieu of an actual donation of . 90 acres for public park purposes . The date of this valuation is March 7 , 1987 . While this evaluation analysis does not constitute a narrative appraisal by any means , it is based on sound appraisal technique and is as accurate a market analysis of sales and conditions in the subject ' s area as the scope of this assignment warranted . It is my understanding that this format is suitable and acceptable to your needs . Market value is defined as "The most probable price in terms of money which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale , the buyer and seller , each acting prudently , knowledgeably and assuming the price is n?i ) affected by undue stimulus" ( Emphasis generally added ) . The study consisted of my personal inspection of the property on Saturday , March 7 , 1987 , as well as as study of the general area . In addition to the County Assessor ' s office , sales data publications and our own office files were researched for sales data , which was used to arrive at the indicated estimate of market value . ( 1 )AIREA , Real Estate Appraisal Terminology , Page 137 Ms . Barbara Cacchione March 9 , 1987 Page 2 Because the subject project is a vacant parcel , of the three classic approaches to value normally used ( Cost , Market and %Or Income Approaches ) , only the Market Approach is considered applicable . The market approach is the process of analyzing sales of similar recently sold properties in order to derive an indication of the most probable sales price of the property being appraised . The subject property is physically located contiguous to , and north of , the Pavilion Shopping Center which at the northwest corner of North Tamiami Trail ( U . S . 41 ) and Vanderbilt Beach Road ( S . R. 862 ) in the North Naples/Vanderbilt Beach area of Collier County , Florida . The subject is legally described by a lengthy metes and bounds description which is attached hereto . The site has 218 . 97 feet of frontage on Tamiami Trail and 1 , 169 . 74 of frontage on 91st Avenue . The property ' s southern boundary is an irregular ( zig-zag ) line abutting the Pavilion Shopping Center with a measured distance of 1 ,722 . 13 feet . The western property line abuts the Beach Walk residential condominium project and measures 436 . 36 feet . The property is currently zoned as RSF-6 ( Residential Multi -Family District ) for approximately 14 . 14 acres . The residential land is the larger part of the total parcel C lying 300 feet west of Tamiami Trail . The remaining 1 . 53 acres of the subject is that irregular shaped portion extending 300 feet deep from Tamiami Trail and is zoned C-4 ( Commercial General ) . Physical characteristics of the site include a 2 . 89 acre lake , 1 . 53 acres of jurisdictional wetlands , 11 . 25 acres of pine uplands and some minor site improvements including a paved path from the Pavilion Shopping center to 91st Avenue and some drainage structures . Total acreage of this parcel is 15 . 67 acres . At the southwest corner of Tamiami Trail and 91st Avenue there is an out-parcel of 1 . 59 acres of uplands which is not the subject of this analysis . That portion of the property which is zoned C-4 and containing 1 . 53 acres is found to be of nominal value ( based on utility ) as a commercial tract . This parcel has been determined by a qualified Environmental Engineer to be almost totally jurisdictional wetlands . Therefore , while this portion of the site has commercial zoning , its highest and best use is as a water management area for the residential development of the remainder of the property which is non-jurisdictional and highly developable . Ms . Barbara Cacchione March 9 , 1987 Page 3 The overall highest and best use of this parcel , is fcr residential multi -family development . There is reasonable probability that the County Planning Department would allow a zoning change from C-4 to at least RMF-6 for the commercial wetlands so as to utilize the potential density of these 1 . 53 acres . The residential units would be transferred to the developable uplands leaving the wetlands along Tamiami Trail in their natural state as a buffer and part of the water management system for the entire parcel . The current Collier County Zoning Ordinances indicate that the subject property , by virtue of its existing RMF-6 zoning , and the reasonable probability that the 1 . 53 acres commercial portion could obtain rezone to RMF-6 , has a present maximum density of 6 units per acre , or 94 units for the entire 15 . 67 acres . It is further noted that the subject property , under the Community Development Division ' s " Point System" could now qualify for a PUD zoning change for up to 8 units per acre , or 125 units for the entire 15 . 67 acres . Based on the existing zoning in place for the subject parcel , highest and best use of this property , at this time , is for residential multi -family development of up to 94 units , provided all development requirements can be met . In order to estimate the value of the subject property , sales with similar utility (or highest and best use ) are compared with the subject to determine an appropriate unit value ( price per developable unit in this case ) . Three recent sales in the subject ' s competitive market place were considered and a current contract , which at the request of the parties , must remain confidential . The three sales indicate unit values between $14 ,665 and $18 , 286 per developable unit . The confidential contract , while not heavily relied upon , is supportive at $15 , 500 per developable units . It should be noted that in the Naples area , developers who are buying and selling residential land are very aware of density and a great many of those active in the market are making buy/sell decisions based on cost per developable unit . Any particular tract is subject to local market expectations for that area and as a result , finished product pricing is important . A prudent developer knows what price range and product type a site is suited for prior to its purchase . The developer also knows what it will cost to construct the finished product ( units ) in terms of both direct and indirect development costs , as well as his required profit per unit . The sum of these cost and profit subtracted from what the market will reasonably pay for the finished unit is that amount of dollars the developer can Ms . Barbara Cacchione March 9 , 1987 Page 4 afford to pay for the land on a per unit basis . This type of developer thinking is the rule rather than the exception in this area . It is my opinion that the subject falls near to the bottom of the range of unit values indicated by the sales con- sidered . Refer to Sales Sheets 1 , 2 , 3 , and 4 , attached hereto for details of these sales . Sale 1 is the purchase of the Beach Walk site ( adjacent to and west of the sub- ject ) . This property is considered superior to the subject due to access from Vanderbilt Beach Road and it being somewhat closer to beach access . Sales 2 is the purchase of Pelican Ridge a short distance to the north and is not given primary weight due to actual versus used density . While verification indicates that the motivation and basis of the sale was for construction of 140 units , actual density was higher which weakens the sales reliability somewhat . The most recent sale is the purchase of the Timberwood site on Airport Road . This sale is considered a good value indicator as it is perhaps not as close to the beach but does not have the negative characteristic of being accessed from 91st Avenue in Naples Park which is perceived as a lower class area . The homes across 91st Avenue from the subject support this as they have little , if any , pride of ownership , and are generally low cost housing units . With major emphasis on Sale 3 and support from the other sales , as well as the contract , it is my opinion that the appropriate unit value for the subject parcel is $15 , 000 per developable unit . In order to estimate the value of a . 90 acre portion of the subject to determine a basis for cash contribution to Collier County in lieu of donating a public park parcel , the established unit value will be multipled by the number of units that the . 90 acre portion of the property would contribute to the overall project. At 6 units per acre the . 90 acres represents 5 . 40 , or 5 units . When the market value of the units at $15 ,000 per developable unit is applied to the unit count , the estimated market value of the . 90 acres for a public park as of March 7 , 1987 , is : $ 15 ,000 x 5 developable units = $75 ,000 It should be noted and clearly understood that this value analysis represents a preliminary analysis/study and was not the result of a narrative appraisal investigation and , as such , the estimate of market value reported herein , while Ms . Barbara Cacchione March 9 , 1987 Page 5 considered reliable and accurate , would be subject to change in light of a complete appraisal being performed , if such was warranted . Very truly yours , COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS , INC . Douglas J . Dane , A. S .A . Vice-President/Broker Real Estate Division DJD/sam Attachment cc : Pat Carroll (:) (;) COMPARABLE SALES DATA No . 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lengthy metes and bounds , portion of Section 33 , Township 48 , Range 25 , Collier County , Florida , as recorded in O . R . Book 1176 , Page 564 . LOCATION : Northern Naples SHAPE : Irregular FRONTAGE/ACCESS : 3 ,508 feet on Vanderbilt Beach Road , 440 feet on Vanderbilt Drive , 3 , 638 feet on 91st Avenue North . SIZE : 59 . 73 Acres ZONING : RMF-6 (maximum density 358 units ) HIGHEST & BEST USE : Residential Development UTILITIES : All available RECORDED : Official Record Book 1176 , Page 564 DATE OF SALE : January 1 , 1986 GRANTOR : Collier Development Corporation GRANTEE : Radnor Collier Corporation PRICE : S6 , 200 ,000 FINANCING : Cash UNIT OF VALUE : $ 17 ,318 per developable unit VERIFICATION SOURCE : Grantor , Grantee , Public Records COMMENTS : This site is located just west of the Pavilion Shopping Center and is currently being developed as the Beachwalk Community . • COMPARABLE SALES DATA No . 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of the W 1/2 of the ti. SW 1/4 , Section 13 , Township 49 South , Range 25 East , less W100 ' , Collier County , Florida . LOCATION : East side of Airport Road , approxi - mately 2 , 000 feet south of Pine Ridge Road SHAPE : Irregular FRONTAGE/ACCESS : Approximately 660 feet on canal adjacent to Airport Road SIZE : 18 . 49 Acres ZONING : A-2 ( purchased subject to PUD rezone for 116 units ) HIGHEST & BEST USE : Residential Development UTILITIES : All but sewer until County has capacity , until such time on site sewage treat- ment plant is required . RECORDED: Official Record Book 1192 , Page 653 Nem- DATE OF SALE : April 17 , 1986 GRANTOR : C . J . Mozzochi GRANTEE : Louis F . Reynaud , IV , Trustee PRICE : $ 1 , 566 ,000 ( deed ) , $1 , 700 , 000 ( cash equivalent ) FINANCING : $434 ,000 PMM at 10% , $232 , 000 at 0% , see comments UNIT OF VALUE : $ 13 , 500 per unit ( deed ) , $ 14 , 655 per unit ( cash equivalent ) VERIFICATION SOURCE : Grantee , public records COMMENTS : Access to this sale required purchaser building a bridge across major Collier County drainage/retention canal . Engineer ' s estimate to build this bridge was approximately $200 ,000 . Project is known as Timberwood . $434 ,000 PMM at 10% contains release clauses which will accelerate payment to very short term note and is considered cash equivalent . $232 ,000 note at 0% interest is obviously atypical and represents present cash value of approximately $ 162 ,000 , based on cash Cequivalence calculations assuming ten year amortization and five year terms ( total sellout of 116 units ) with normal seller financing at 10% . Total cash equivalence per calcu - lations is $900 ,000 cash plus $434 ,000 PMM , plus $162 ,000 ( cash equivalent ) PMM , $200 ,000 for access bridge equals $ 1 ,696 ,000 . Grantee stated he was aware of atypical financing in his favor and said in his mind the cash equivalent value was $ 13 ,000 per unit , or $ 1 , 508 ,000 ( plus bridge $200 ,000 ) equals $ 1 , 708 ,000 . The appraisers have correlated to a total cash equivalent price of $1 , 700 ,000 or $ 14 , 655 per unit for 116 units . (:) 4:){ Al COMPARABLE SALES DATA No . 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Confidential contract LOCATION : Wiggins Pass Road , west of U . S . 41 SHAPE : Irregular FRONTAGE/ACCESS : Wiggins Pass Road SIZE : Approximately 76 acres ZONING : RMF-6 (contract based on 342 units density ) HIGHEST & BEST USE : Residential development UTILITIES : All available RECORDED : Recent contract DATE OF SALE : Scheduled to close early 1987 GRANTOR: Confidential contract GRANTEE : Confidential contract PRICE : $5 , 301 , 000 FINANCING : To be a cash to seller ( acquisi - tion/construction mortgage ) UNIT OF VALUE : $ 15 , 500 per unit VERIFICATION SOURCE : Purchaser , contract COMMENTS : Purchaser , stated contract based on a unit value of $15 , 500 per attainable unit , it is reported that County will allow 342 units maximum. aIIIIIIIIIk pp�p i..ll.nl.ySypr l 1 /000 W.IGGGINS PASS An :1� •3x:444-ii9l --- .--1nImPIKM 4I4'r1,;�,�.....— a25E•t ( .-. 7-: CANI:ItlfAN•tl 3�y /• (tiM 3 e -%._ s d i • Y EMU .> 7 i ,n.,,ti i. ..."1-•:.L.1 12... E "". hdsN is r ,.. ,f}... • 4t w QM y J 'I E�r. § .- I �; ?. Iona :1 _ — .. .-----Si• 1111 Af Nfw.r. N ' • ''•- D I •.y.. • 2' s 7 ,otr YIVtI :1 :0 I I . Elil „ f: �� 0 fl a ,"[1/y/• ��ftoaxe_is• �I�� .,,awn GY_K[IfUGNEt Pa Q ' KY :� • rl,Y Nrl1 9Enlgx f.- I • if a1A.',- — Z -•r� �� his°iuiir au� _.tuaNnrceAf1u� f N d E S ARDYDAL[ __3u,c NYr'r.u� / ': .1 :.s... ••h•...,r•.•. r,. tiy`(1'IrIEOE - • .. uN s7 / •'� t rlUEritl -,Ay,• 1111TH AV IMMOKALEE �ir�i'+qD�" - ` drip q'S g4 4 i t --'_..1» .r ry 846 :sauTl,wlYO z t Vl .100 • •v .CA4 v� ESi 'n+N� C - .v .._ 1011N Ay 'C'MKT ar t. ] fr COMERS AY y>!r_ •v f a . : Z ('� W lulu ,><,EDGEWIlO y >L.r4r,cEB:v N - • 7a C g y. ESI. } ,v .rS!97.-°su ui __ RPLES ,, lls d ' 01:0.0. *11.1.11 '•' r �' i o--V Ay USnOt ]0 • Lr Imo. . PARK- WORM y�IDUn iPt..r.05 3rin WO[II 1 SELS9Rf C— VANDERBIL: d s 1 v r» .v (�,„„7:1:2?: ti” :y ., F` y rt•:?If._ BEACH..., e - — a 1---, i C9ISC(N1 T U �e - • i 2 MIST. -"1.!Z. Z,:o.A•.cE sr - •r ' . = 3 CARLTON $ "ANOE subject 3 eq T6,8E.:CH "."...:-/..1.... 1 Q _ At?, i D• y 32 J • rI. 1.1 .1•. la •' 71 • xw•.'"" a Q I •1'il Land Sale 2 31 • ( ' 'AOPOSEO 601.DEN GATE ' . ul —� IN•Mr•N I T �� __.... SEVO 01 may.-1�+.�_.__.I a' RO yL5!y"1c I \? I` il YIId �� . ._ R 25 C K:5 E A ► FJ.E 'sal CjWNNrsN— I j I RIDGE\ ! /q .�'G. _JI ol1 �.!n�C No:sGN ON_- CurM SANG 1E SF»Eryxire C entnonrsw eA•n4s J.ay S•ND rOwT[GU�,W'UR c�:5- f°” y'`= II P P 4 1'L�e�o i ru9 a IIRDIALIE - [n NO onrnl�l:. - •- {'ELICAN, '� — W., 1 D' - -- z - BAY »oulwuu g ,E_ —TRrP--_ .9 •r 3W, -r L•; J •3� iI YfLN[ON..1_'91•_"."-- I I Clam Pay 0 1 ` 0 9 ;rN •v ?•0.!uiN 1 t II E VfkCA 4 VQ I \ V n s g '",niis _r.... Er J� ."w. ,,...:,-,F F :�.,. Vii•�, its Ar .:,M j I.out,;(. On_y1.•••?*• •Q.s^y Xx0 ,. .�A l,. ...1"7::.`' tniGw 6 3_L9VG!ll—LID...... rf et Clans _ �I OF I■ hIt uor J X• arcr.t t .a rrC.xO_•r.r..•u II BIIY J Cry li - q• .w ... _ '' PINE r ��RIDGE 1 ND I �r • t\ PINE RIDGE I-- OAT.• lNH(CKTgt-SCSOYT-s- :9�-„,,,,,--7, - •EoN»I-..µl 3 187 %•Z"rl•••.cw. '-----1 896 - (( = I} )�u. • � - _ a f•It f ) _- L"f--flYQ�wi W000- SFAWTE 'b\.�'I �(r�"°wa. 4u ..••$$L 7A,4G74a 7� r.I SKIRL I 10TH uw,r..arn•.•_.. SC•G•rf.� 1 `• _t f•� 'a ..Rle" . — •'j'•1 _--'-,0•.0E2eLL„ 5 \ . •f';•'7-,,.11A .--- ' :. e/• - Il I/ I.� ~ 19••. :� ._i. ¢,7n ,y,M:o g Mf , ,... :.• e , NWSRIIING fINfS_ T S -- 1 i\ /�E' PQII7 ANL-rL 1 c Swo:OC .' KI 1 - : wY N .,c Y. NORTH 1 w[[[/ .1 dr • ii {.•c Mus ,, •. 41 d a('I • 4. .1� a .1 i` 11 -c §., - E ILNFin^foi j :,'" ;w1 u.a)9,. `Ler 11 • %� _s.o:1 NFL 2,:si 9 , 3�) rIuNT.c . . I '-�s4PinN99ECa� C r;l� 'sE.1+ `� P ' ._-_ .._ 1PARK ':'11..., f: C,naSIAL1t+++, NAPLES `=;. �;� /'. '- �..°: GI _ T ...... - •_ •.D t»• rn^ •I.iv».r,n.f[ +s} �•_..i•1-y',,('s fl2Q�►1NF .--•ADVILOIRCIARADR f‘.h L .....,J .. WOODS o, SHOR1 • •• t,' f� -•— L _� .w.z.un"".�• i 't •e. i /[_x_{W•E nr1l_N 1 —Htr1--El r 1�'A`At 1 O 0°V<.?nIf T I: _4LLAI__'IL. ( w --I41»._. •o, i . C. ■,P - I A1 _,,,,.• IA., ; . . -.� • a Land Sales Ma �./ i c DA .. . dam_ p ...r3 n cs•�ryrf • I..x,'t=sf"�°•ur 1" G .R T v ? 85 a�J -��9 o FF' TmExruE i. r 0�� r•Lr.•. /• F ' •..I. 6..____,...,E_,,,„, nowoi.— ,..) .. A §: D' ' I.-:f;^_.. �{�1 'T Am /~ R.)]EYYIS f:Ce►a MLI YC�)f.-_SE' 4% Ys- J J _� _ -�_uluCZ 14G.1� '1"r�,x; 1 I� _11—.l I m ail_ ' , R(d 1� d(:)• _ ' S�J! , °i . S :), • 4 - 0• i [ = •C• • i ) , , Q e- • U ..) KozmI_- QI ° t , L; 1T- t' S hS, Q ,, g ,. O s.I. �, STREET S v �_ uN .. 1 (y J I ! On ' I t pl' p •t 1g. - `© `, •• ll' ., ...-;.(•;"): �. r 9 ( _ .^ cC(2)'>� '• ' «l.:), )08 ' _C)8 .T _®1 ;®2( '.®. (�)3• ' °,.®) i 0 3)it,. 7(:), • Lam, )a .t e' I CO 'lam;:a,.Q=' Ia•u 'I g(�1. tC�... • g(g�, 'U� ', s0, 07 1. i' 1• ' '...,•.‘"4), ,®_ .y'40). 1 A-I + +O'•' ' yU )`�' ' to '(``; = •• so. •Q? i' SO' '®= '1A(A /� 1 �,1 .. -I•.:_ 3 J a 1' L' ) '®a .. t.V' k C ' Jo:. `. a tC)1 I r . A N • .(f)r ,I` A(/'. , • i t T� — I •?, s U° ;(J_ sQ; CII —1�• � t .n �� z _ . kQY: ,'A • , •' tlO' Ty ylft .O1 •®- !r ;;1,40)to- x®4 ,o=•` , z5-1 �, --- ii • • r 8 TM r - STREET u -,- i u ��u,© M r 1 i -,"440' MUM°� =Ogg t =V : g .{ '7�.1 t I Subject ` '®�.. nom, � � C=',1 ®i • + V°r Li it 4(Y" t IO `1 Y'O' t w 31 :e, G I *'u i• '®n ®a •'max,x,�= s^ z `��"C� ( -4 . ,,.n .nn L' p �• J p mil, Z ,�)� ,� -� •c ❑ i 3G4 [ - { 6 cQ:.. c t . t.....A ° m 0-1')1::.'1'..e,..(:):r t ° • O a ' • ' I ■ Z - • .. tx> ,C) 1 . s•(1)t = -- -r =U•.t. . . 1 .0a '•t"-=®. S 7O•u 7 t Z • L)° ° `°)• Z '1'" . C. L •/O r • S d S 0' ..,..L.:.----!..:.- 40 n L N 1 o TAMIAMI TRAIL U. S. - 41 U N - T 1 d T#A$L WYLLY..e I • • r • C � PAVILION LAKE DESCRIPTION A parcel of land lying in Section 33 , Township 48 South , Range 25 East , Collier County , Florida , being more particu- larly described as follows : cc Commencing at the east quarter corner of said Section 33 , run SOO° 37 ' 39" E along the east line of said Section 33 a distance of 17 . 65 feet to the extension of the northerly right-of-way line of Vanderbilt Beach Road ; thence N80°08 ' 2C"W 152 . 55 feet along said extension to the inter- section cf said northerly right-of-way line with the westerly right-of-way line of U . S . 41 ; thence continue N80°08 ' 20"W along said northerly right-of-way line 1565 . 50 feet ; thence N09°51 ' 4C" E 579 . 68 feet to the point of beginning of the herein described parcel ; thence S84° 14 ' 58" E t'2"t4 feet ; thence S89° 34 ' 49 " E 140-00 feet ; thence S63°08 ' 19" E 3�}i}•:-3.5� feet ; thence N26° 51 ' 41" E1=4:6 feet ; thence S89°34 ' 49" E feet to the westerly right-of-way line of U . S . 41 ; thence N00° 39 ' 06"W along said right-of-way line 8 7 feet ; 0 thence leaving said right-of-way line N89°34 ' 49"W x ..:307 0 feet ; thence N48° 50 ' 15" W <:,.34, feet ; thence 577° 14 ' 04" W Q °°4.4744- feet ; thence NOO°39 ' 06"W 46J1,40, feet to the southerly ' right-of-way line of 91st Avenue North ; thence N89°34 ' 49"W N along said right-of-way line feet ; thence leaving said southerly right-of-way line SO9' 51 ' 40" W -4.r6-.=:36 feet ; thence S80'08 ' 20" E },iii}-oafh feet ; thence S09°51 ' 40"W 1-R—r n feet to the Point of Beginning of the herein described parcel . The above describes an area of approximately 15 . 67 acres of land . ' Pn,lE Subject to easements , restrictions and reservations of record . 0 4)16` • dl e . 8 ? 2A� . a� •' ■J 48-- -sC' v ��'- .34'-49u W ■ ETLANS ►.1oT LGCA.TED 1..:1.1 C..)Ecz. SCoP E. tr- QUALIFICATIONS OF DOUGLAS J . DANE Licensed Real Estate Broker #0193605 EDUCATION B.S. Degree in Business Administration , Real Estate Major Federal Highway Administrations Appraisal Review Course Florida Department of Transportation Right-Of-Way Appraisal Techniques American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers coursework: - Real Estate Appraisal Principles - Residential Valuation - Basic Valuation Procecures - Capitalization Theory and Technique - Part I - Capitalization Theory and Technique - Part 2 - Capitalization Theory and Technique - Part 3 - Case Studies In Real Estate Valuation - Valuation Analysis and Report Writing - Litigation Valuation - Industrial Valuation - Standards of Professional Practice Society of Real Estate Appraisers coursework: - Course 101 , Principles of Real Estate Appraisal - Course 201 , Income Property Valuation - Course 301 , Feasibility and Market Analysis • REAL ESTATE EXPERIENCE 6/1985 to Present: Vice President, Real Estate Division , Coastal Engineering, Naples, Florida 1983 to 1985 : Review Appraiser, Florida Department of Trans- portation, District Four, Ft. Lauderdale , Fl. 1981 to 1983 : Broker-Appraiser, President/Owner of Lormann , Inc. Realtors , Altamonte Springs , Florida 1980 to 1981 : Sales Manager-Appraiser, Heart of Florida Real Estate Services, Longwood, Florida 1978 to 1980 : Real Estate Salesman, Fricke & Fricke Assoc . , Casselberry, Florida TYPES OF PROPERTY APPRAISED Residential , Residential Income Property, Industrial , Office Buildings , and various residential and commercial vacant lots and parcels . Other appraisal activities have been in the realm of reviewing both F. D .O .T. staff and fee appraisals on Interstate Highways I-95 and I- 595 . The review function was to correlate and reconcile between two appraiser ' s value estimates and recommend to the Department Just Compensation . Have also performed detailed analysis of parcels before and after values , along with severance damage studies. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Registered Real Estate Broker, Florida License #0193605 National Association of Realtors Senior Member , American Society Of Appraisers Candidate , American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, R-830218 c • WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK, INC. MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 1987 TO: Clifford Crawford, Director Collier County Parks and Recreation Department A FROM: Robert E. Furlong . Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll & Peek, Inc. SUBJECT: Collier County Community Parks Update Summary GOLDEN GATE * Status : Open Minor shake-down and warranty work continuing. IMMOKALEE * Status : Open Minor shake-down and warranty work continuing . * Improvements have been made to waterproof the electrical connections within the electric concrete pull boxes on these sites. As a result of this work these parks have been closed to nighttime operation this past week. This work will be completed as of this date , restoring full operation to all park facilities. e . WILSON • MILLER • BARTON • BOLL S. PEEK, INC. NORTH NAPLES Status : Under Construction Estimated Completion Date : June , 1987 Contracts Status 1. BP1 - Site Preparation 100% complete (Harper Bros. , Inc . ) 2. BP2 - Site Electric 98% complete - remaining work: (Mid-Continent Buildings electric and aim Electric, Inc. ) recreational lighting . 3. BP3 - Buildings and Shelters 99% complete - remaining work: (Bunn Construction, punch items Inc. ) 4. BP4 - Sitework Finishes 75% complete - remaining work : (McGovern Construction Complete fencing, irrigation Corp. ) system and landscaping . 5. BP5 - Outdoor Game Courts 98% complete - remaining work: (McGovern Construction Miscellaneous finishes. Corp. ) 6. BP6 - Paving 50% complete - remaining work : (MacAsphalt, Inc. ) Asphalt for roads and parking, limerock and asphalt for sidewalks. v N c•••••c/110 J� s WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK, INC. MARCO ISLAND Status : Under construction. Estimated Completion Date: May 22, 1987 Contracts Status 1. BP1 - Sitework and Paving 45% Parking areas in progress. (Better Roads , Inc. ) 2. BP2 - Buildings and Site Building dried-in. Construction Electric continues on schedule. (Mollenhauer, Inc. ) 3 . BP3 - Landscaping and Miscellaneous underground Irrigation sleeves installed. (Sunny Grove Landscaping Inc . ) EAST NAPLES Status: Presently, various permits are being processed with the Army Corps of Engineers, and South Florida Water Management District . Design efforts are in progress. Estimated Begin Construction: July, 1987 Estimated Completion Date: April, 1988 NOTE: All completion dates are estimated dates based on the best information available at this time. Not until the final 30+ days of construction can a reliable, accurate construction schedule be established for the purposes of planning a park opening date. These completion dates will constantly be updated to reflect the expected progress of the work. COUNTY GOVERNMENT CALCULATION OF PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS 1987-88 - 1991-92 0 REQUIRED CO. OF COUNTY INVTY SURPLUS OR COST PER VALUE TYPE OF FACILITY 9/30/92* 9/87 (DEFICIENCY) UNIT OR (COST) Archery/trap/skeet range 780 ,000 Amphitheater 2. 1 1 ( 1 . 1 ) 100 ,000 < 110 ,000 ) Badminton courts 3 .9 ( 3.9) 10 ,000 ( 39,000 ) ' Baseba 1 1 f i e f ds 2 ( S ) 1Z6.1Z6. 0‘20 ( &-g•Caoa ) Basketball courts 20 .3 6 ( 14.3) 17,500 ( 250 ,250) Beach Access: linear mi . 50 , 160 < 321 ,024) Bicycle trails: miles 9.4 3 < 6.4) Camping/R.V. park : sites 49.2. ( to, , ) 4,500 ( 'A79, o °• ) Canoe trails: miles 15.7 ( 15.7) 0 0 Childrens' playgrounds 54.8 14 ( 40 .8) 7,000 ( 285,600) 0, Civic centers ) 1 ,700 ,000 ( /, 702 < 5 ) 610 ,000 ( 3,0 51 ,000) Community centers 9 Community/Dist . park: ac . 219. 1 126 ( z•/ ) ;,y, voo ( '7711/ two ` Equestrian trails: miles 2.6 ( 2.6) 31 ,680 ( 82,368) Fitness station trails 9.4 ( 9.4) 50 ,000 ( 470 ,000 ) Football fields 9.4 1 .5 ( q ) 135,000 < 5yo, 000. ) Golf courses-18 hole 0 .2 ( 0 .2) 2,000 ,000 ( 400 ,00000) vGymnasiums / ( I . ) 910 ,000 ( 910r _ 3.Q 1 ( ;t,q ) 26, 400 ( 76,560) ;b 6cin�, T2�t;ls< ,�t1�5 ( 300 300 .0)) ��E Oaf) < �'7, a-oo,0oC ) Metro/Urban park : acres 300 .0 • Neighborhood park: acres 2 • 29 450 ,000 ) Neighborhood pool 1 ( 1 ) 450 ,000 ( 468 ,29 36,828 1 ,068,012 Olympic pool / ( / ) 1 ,564,000 ( /, Silt/ C.00 ) Picnic areas: acres 156.5 19 ( / 3j �. ) 18,000 ( ( N'�, �� ) Picnic pavillions 31 .3 0 .6 1 0 .4 30 ,000 12,000 Piers-saltwater / _ ( / ) 30 ,000 ( zo, ucc ) Racquetball courts 20 .3 12 ( 8.3) 17,500 ( 145,250) Regional Park: acres 62.4 C 62.4) sy, cot ( 2, 172,768) < 3.5) 6,250 ( 21 ,875) ' 'Shuffleboard courts 12.5 9 Soccer fields 9.4 1 .5 ( !i ) 135 ,000 ( /, L/97. 600 ) Softball fields 20 .3 18 ( 2.3) 125,000 ( 287,500 ) Special Purpose parks;AcRFS aco ( , CC) ) - may,0c0 ( S5'o, cO ) Tennis courts 10 .3 22 11 .7 18 ,750 219,375 Track & field 1 ( 1 ) 191 ,520 ( 191 ,520) Volleyball courts 20 .3 6 ( 14.3) 17,500 < 250 ,2500) Zoos 0 Boat ramps-freshwater 9.8 2 ( 7 ) 180 ,262 ( ' /1 21,/, gay ) Boat ramps-saltwater 19.5 6 ( 13 ) 180 ,262 (9� V3% Total * Calculated by multiplying the total required facilities Countywide (see p . 74) by the County's percentage allocation of responsibility (see p. 73. ) 1-29-87b •- - . I 75 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A PAY REQUEST FOR INCREASE QUANTITY FOR THE PAVING OF IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY PARK IN THE AMOUNT OF $5, 701. 30 OBJECTIVE: To receive Board approval for a pay request for an increase in the paving contract to Harper Brothers, Inc. at Immokalee Community Park in the amount of $5, 701. 30. CONSIDERATIONS: The contract that was awarded for the paving of Immokalee Community Park was a unit price contract for estimated quantities for subgrade, base course and paving. The contract estimated quantities do not accurately reflect the quantities of paving that were shown on the construction plans for the park. The contractor was directed to pave all areas shown on Phase 1, Part 2, Construction of the Park. With this contract being issued as a unit price for estimated quantities, some final quantities were also less than the estimated quantities. This pay request is for as built quantities upon completion of the contract, as measured by the Collier County Engineering Department and the Consulting Engineers, Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll & Peek, Inc. All work performed by the contractor was within the authorized contract and the net increases of cost is within 10% of the original contract amount . This will increase Harper Brothers, Inc. , contract from $58, 832. 83 to $64, 534. 13. The County Engineering Department and the consulting engineers have certified these quantities to be true and recommend the approval of this pay request. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board at their meeting of March 19th approved this pay request. FISCAL IMPACT: This increase of $5, 701. 30 is to be paid out of 1986-87 Fiscal Year budget. Adequate monies are available to cover this increase in Account #306-113-6384-6310, Parks and Recreation Capitol Improvement, Immokalee Community Park. A I' RECOMMENDATION: Staff and PARAB recommend approval of the increase quantities for Harper Brother, Inc. , for paving at Immokalee Community Park. Prepared by: Date: Murdo Smith Park Superintendent Reviewed by: Date: Cliff Crawford Parks and Recreation Director Reviewed by: Date: Kevin O' Donnell Public Services Administrator MS/ lc 3/6/87 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNITY PARKS CONSULTANT AGREEMENT AND APPROVAL FOR CHARGES INCURRED IN THE REDESIGN OF EAST NAPLES PARK OBJECTIVE: To receive board approval of an amendment to the community parks consultant agreement and approval of charges incurred for the redesign of the East Naples Community Park. CONSIDERATIONS: On November 8, 1983 the Board of County Commissioners entered into an agreement with Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll and Peek, Inc. for professional services for the construction of five community parks. On December 10, 1985 the Board approved Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll and Peek, Inc. to proceed with a redesign of East Naples Community Park. This redesign was necessary due to the September 1985 determination by the Department of Environmental Regulations ( D. E. R. > , that the park contained jurisdictional wetlands. The cost for the redesign is $8,000. It has since been determined that certain services specifically covered in Sections 1. 3. 5 - Revenue Management Program; Section 2. 8 - Maintenance and Overhead Expense Investigation; 2. 15 - Preparation Of An Operating And Maintenance Manual are no longer required. These deletions are a result of reduction in the amount and type of facilities that were constructed in phase one development of the parks. The cost of these services are estimated at $8000. The County Engineering Department and the Parks & Recreation Department have reviewed the contract document and concur the Amendment is an equitable adjustment of the contract, with a net no change in contract price. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board at their meeting on March 19th, 1987 approved this amendment to the contract. FISCAL IMPACT: None. -2- RECOMMENDATION: Staff and PARAB recommends the approval of the amendment to the contract and that the adjustment in the scope of services as to the consultants is an equitable adjustment for the costs incurred with the Redesign of East Naples Community Park. Prepared by: Date: Murdo Smith Park Superintendent Reviewed by: Date: Cliff Crawford Parks and Recreation Director Reviewed by: Date: Kevin O' Donnell Public Services Administrator MS: lc 3/5/87 N AMENDMENT TO THE STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND PROJECT MANAGER FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES THIS IS AN AGREEMENT to amend the agreement by and between the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida ( hereinafter called OWNER> and Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soil & Peek, Inc. , (hereinafter called PROJECT MANAGER> dated the 8th day of November, 1983, providing for professional project management services in connection with a project known as Collier County Community Parks. In consideration of value received and acknowledged by the parties and covenants herein provided between the parties, OWNER and PROJECT MANAGER agree to the following changes, deletions and additions and amend the above-referenced Agreement as follows: SECTION ONE. Section 2.8, 2. 15 additional services of PROJECT MANAGER, and 1. 3. 5 special provisions are hereby deleted in their entirety. The PROJECT MANAGER is hereby relieved and released from all duties, responsibilities and obligations set forth in said subsections. SECTION TWO. Add redesign of East Naples Community Park Master Flan as approved by OWNER on 12-10--85. SECTION THREE. The PROJECT MANAGER shall compensate OWNER for the deletion of Section 2.8, 2. 15, and 1.3. 5 in the amount of 08,000. The OWNER shall compensate the PROJECT MANAGER in the amount of $8,000 for the redesign of the East Naples Master. Plan. Deletions $8,000 Redesign 8,000 Net -0- SECTION FOUR. The parties hereto recognize and agree that the above amendments constitute all changes and amendments to that certain agreement dated November 8, 1983 by and between OWNER and PROJECT MANAGER. The parties further confirm and ratify said Agreement with the above-noted amendment and agree that it is the intent of the parties hereto that said Agreement is and shall remain in full force and effect as amended above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day of , 1987. OWNER: ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS JAMES C. GILES, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA -- -- -- - By: MAX J. HASSE, JR. Chairman PROJECT MANAGER: Witness: THOMAS R. PEEK, Vice President Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll & Peek, Inc. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David Weigel Assistant County Attorney C • l • C • i �°V s a. H ( H 2 S .a Z O O p • -0 n • r ca r u r • a a a 9 n - • n 0 • a n a • • n 0- �• N K r A a F a F • F a • a .n. .< N Cn - • a .- -.- a a ••V. 0 H H C) a a a > X a re o • • o • A ..4 A g H R a a n a 4 a an a IC • •0 • v a a • •a 11 Z '(II`J • > 7C .0 ;w cm H n n a 74. +f F a V. a �- H to > v, a a • A n B • O a 1 _ �. ti ti I _ r Li i ri 7 x o `-• r - ...,l I J1 -i • ,� r Y' .. i -, L 0 w _! , _ ✓ rte, j Y LI R -� ► J i �� iN�U J I Cr, . 1 , - ,n I ' t.' tiJ I v I 4� S ' v V .. t of r > A s I�.. I I J P I ( • ' -----( :1 7 C ,.., c - , 8 -1).._....° .4 - 9- c ). c) X3 wo ).• rrl t'l » . 9 - •-7-r- - .-- cc.) 7c ,, ... J24-':.; . - r. < ,_., 73 0'7 •-3 al ..-. ----- l'- ' r'i z ir Z --1 z P` ■--3 9Th ' r, ,.4 x 0 \,.. s-- "Mr.. .... . , ■%-.) 'II , 0 •-3 0 0 o ....., 1/4.4.4 ..-- C ! ..: 74 r--1 c--) c) c r- CP '7 - 0 .., ".4 H r--4 0-3 L--■ 0 0 z 0 rri H a z r-. rt a 0 t-' = ..= -4..., r=i c/) CA (..- ..., I — r- - ' Z". ■-.;. ,..,_i - 2 •-:". ‘• „A__ 4- ,i-.-) e•-• T- c) _,-r"-; c- _ . ___--, ----,5 ,.. s_ -t-,---- (7 ,...,_, r, TI -.. t'' ' -- il. • '.-- 77) . , 's ...-1 '71 --I.-, ...■ ."4- I (-777' , (-' e '1,-, ',- --1_-.1-- 0 -0 -...-L. ,--; , - ,-..,--,- ::...% t _ r- 2 -. - - " V GO ' t7 (71 .. P C •"" --,.- e •• [. Cu 041 I 0 (.., :1:;./- c,t) , ' s.+-- ,1 ;.., o I i --i- -. 1: --,,:t ., '■ (--) ,...3 73 • ..4....- - 0 --Z. 1.4 <,..i. - (i 0 --/- P ,-, a , • 0 (_-.' i o' :' t•-• ■ 1 --•", C) '-,,.. - Cr/ . 4/1 7:1 ...I t.) ..„. 0 5: ,Z. o . , (....) Z 5. ---- T 4.1 * • ;::1 --- fr.- 4 -ri y-•,• .....- 2- j Cc, 6 , ':1-- -■ 9--) 9 9 ()' k 4- ) 1 In ,-- ■ , -• . k...(1.-.. IF 1. ■._/ -'' f-- o , .I -- P • ., i .. . i (, , _....i.: . ? a_ .-% ',I, - ) '.j k c, ') --" .... ' " ..7; n 1 J.,--,..II - ,, r - L ( .-r -,--. c- - -, •...1-- .r. (-) 1 ( '-' .-- 7 pz n o . a d C/1 3 4-4 4,c7 ra r a a o 0421 as , `1 °_ �' SS C �' H i a • M C7 a C*1 w ~. z rn z a' z z K H 'T1 r r4 0 po w 0 ._4 o 0 )/ n o O a Cr1 rn H r coo CO 'j i-f H r ~ 0 O [T1 0 Z H a z a () r x rti CA c -T O u Ci i (4), .3, ',. 3 iN, .,_j ,..?, 5 P f In tom'; — -- C &+ ; 12 s .,, 0 r:. o 0-° I r�a W _ J err 0 -....c N ki n -_,* 2:), 1 s - I H a t1' R.; J -1. (b w -r., ro • roo - !o A ...1 (AIL) .t 09,- ' `� t rl Cn bT (.--, -- r 6-, b-i L71, I- -' a — r s V ' r. t b 1 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT AT THE NAPLES FEDERAL BANK IN NAPLES AND THE FIRST BANK OF IMMOKALEE IN IMMOKALEE Objective : To obtain approval from the Board of County Commissioners to establish a business checking account at the Naples Federal Bank in Naples and the First Bank of Immokalee in Immokalee. Considerations: The community parks will be collecting money for program registration; and it is a necessity to deposit revenues on a daily basis. Opening a business checking account at Napes Federal Bank in Naples and First Bank of Immokalee at Immokalee has been discussed with the Finance Department and there are no objections to this procedure. This process will be part of the duties and responsibilities of the Parks & Recreation staff at the community parks. The Finance Department will be responsible for transferring monies from these accounts to the proper County banking facilities. The Parks & Recreation Department will not be allowed to write any checks on these accounts. This will crovide the daily deposit of revenues cenerated at the community parks for recreation n ocram registration. Other facilities or programs that arise in these areas may also utilize these same accounts, such as Vanderbilt Beach _parking lot, Clam Pass Park, etc. These banks were considered based on their location from the parks. Each bank is located within three miles from designated park. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board reviewed and approved this act ion on March 19, 1987. Fiscal Impact : None Recommendation : Staff and ?ARAB recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the establishment of a business checking account at the Naples Federal Bank in Naples and the First Bank of Immokalee in Immokalee. Prepared by: �% �i�� R 2 ' i4 Date: ' /f//4 I Marilyn .�cL: ` 1' Recreation Superintendent Reviewed by• Date: Clifford�Crawford/ Parks and Recreation Director Reviewed by: Date: Kevin O' Donnell Public Services Administrator MM/ lc 3/ 10/87 RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL TO APPLY FOR A GRANT FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO PROVIDE LUNCHES FOR IMMOKALEE SUMMER RECREATION PARTICIPANTS Objective : To gain Board approval to apply for a grant with the State of Flordia and County School System to provide lunches for participants of the Immokalee Summer Recreation Program and allow the Parks and Recreation Director to act as the County' s liason officer to administer the grant, if received. Considerations: The Summer Food Service Program ( SFSP) was established to ensure that during school vacation, various agencies would be able to provide the same high quality meals provided during the school year by the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs. The program resulted from an increased awareness providing proper nutrition. SFSP makes meals available to children eighteen ( 18) and under free of charge. Organizations that may sponsor the SFSP are limited to: 1. Public or private non—profit school food authorities and residential camps. 2. State, local, municipal or county government entities certify that they will directly operate the program at each site under the sponsorship. The sponsor will be responsible for supervising site staff and managing program operations at sites during the period of the program participa- tion — in this case, six ( 6) weeks. Sponsors of the SFSP receive state funds based on the number of meals the County School System serves to the children. Reimbursement rates have been established to reflect the costs of administering the program. Sponsors may claim reimbursement for only those meals served to the children participating in the County Summer Recreation Program who are eligible for free or reduced price meals under the National School or School Breakfast Programs. Immokalee is 100% eligible for the SFSP. The SFSP has been successfully administered by the Parks and Recreation Department for the past three ( 3) years. Last summer the grant provided 5, 011 youths with lunches. This summer we expect to provide close to 7, 000 lunches. Immokalee School personnel will be preparing the lunches. Fiscal Impact : There is no fiscal impact. The program is fully funded by the Federal Government. Recommendation : The staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners allow the Parks and Recreation Department to file for the SFSP grant as described above for the 1987 Summer Program and appoint the Parks and Recreation Director as the County' s liason officer to administer the grant, if received. • • Prepared by: ,4_,1 ' AM0211.. Date: 3' /2- 17 • Reviewed by: Date: Reviewed by: Date: JT/ lc Parks and Recreation 3/3/87 rc\ . M ARCH 11 , 1987 • _.... . TO: .BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS E;.��: �,� ompass _ V.4 ,. n COUNTY PURCHASING AGENT �i'� ":F „onStructior1 COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX ; .i. �� .NAPLES,_ FLORIDA. 33962 _ FROM COMPASS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 3717 DEL PRADO BLVD SUITE 3 CAPE CORAL, FLORIDA 33904 RE: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER BID NO. 87- 1068 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING FOR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AT GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY Gentleman : The undersigned, as BIDDER, hereby declares that he has examined the site of the work and informed himself fully In regard to all conditions pertaining to the place where the work is to be done; and that he has examined the Specifications of the work and the Documents hereto attached. The BIDDER further declares that the only persons, company or parties interested in this Proposals or the Contract to be entered into as principals are named herein; that this Proposal is made without connection with any other person , company or parties making Bid or Proposal ; and it is in all respect fair and in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The BIDDER further certifies that he has familiarized himself with the Federal , State and Local laws pertaining to the type of work proposed. The BIDDER proposes and agress , if this Proposal is accepted, to Contract with OWNER in the form of Contract specified, to furnish work in full , in complete accordance with shown, noted, described and reasonable intended requirements of these Plans Specifications . Contract Documents and all Addenda thereto for the following price : TOTAL BASE BID : TWO HUNDRED FORTY SEVEN THOUSAND SEVEN HTJNf)RFD FORTY and 00/100 DOLLARS ($ 247 , 740 .00-----) n/a DOLLARS ($ n/a ) \ Compass Construction,Inc. Suite 3.3717 Del Prado Blvd.Cape Coral,FL 33904 Telephone/813•542•7118 I Lawrence Oliver I Peter Olsen State Certified General Contractor License No. l�t CG CO25919 PAGE TWO PROPOSAL FOR : ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING TIME OF COMPLETION s - M �5 + T g� x sr4'•. ^�,4-,m -: x {If awarded this contract, the undersigned will complete the work wtah oM. PER ADDENDUM calender days frim the date of the notice to proceed. ` J • ADDENDUM RECEIPT Receipt of the following Addenda to the Contract Documents is acknowledged: Addendum No. 1 Dated: 2/27/87 Addendum No. Dated: Addendum No. Dated: REFERENCES: (List a minimum of three (3 ) projects similar in scope and type of construction and type of construction. ) N. FT. MYERS FIRE STATION - PARKER MUDGETT ARCH (813/332- 1171 Name Phone CARDIOCATH LAB - LEE MOMORIAL HOSPITAL (813/334-5622) Name Phone NORTH PORT HEALTH CARE CENTER - BURT HILL KOSAR & RITTLEMANN ASSOCIATES (813/936-4761 ) Name Phone SUBCONTRACTORS TO BE USED: MASTER MECHANIC (813/445-8776) Name Phone LIETNER ELECTRIC CO. (813/768- 1221 ) Name Phone GULF COAST COOLING & HEATING (813/262-4101 Name Phone Compass Construction,Inc. Suite 3,3717 Del Prado Blvd,Cape Coral.FL 33904 Telephone/813.542.7ll8 I Lawrence Oliver I Peter Olsen State Certified General Contractor License No. I Int CG CO25919 PAGE THREE PROPOSAL FOR: ADMINISTRATION OFFLCE BUILDI.NG - :� "� �•`t ._ ja3 Thee_ undersigned as BIDDER,_ hereby certifies that h i,s f fi s directly responsible e `for. more than 501. of the bid ' `proposed work. :rte Q nt-A �L■�'' '-tea.f• L(J COMPASS� ir4 STR TI NC. ,• Witness Name • 7: • t Bl .der' s Signature ., Peter S. Olsen CORPORATE SECRETARY , Title (813/542-7118) Phone MARCH 11 , 1987 Dated Compass Construction,Inc. Suite 3,3717 Del Prado Blvd.,Cape Coral,FL 33904 Telephone/813•542.7118 1 Lawrence Oliver!Peter Olsen State Certified General Contractor License No. ' CG CO25919 Int S E C T I O N 01400 CONTRACT PROPOSAL FORM TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: March 11, 1987 County Purchasing Agent County Government Complex Naples, Florida 33962 FROM: Cornerstone General Contractors, Inc. (Name of Bidder) 4584 Enterprise Ave. Suite 2 (Address of Bidder) Naples, Florida 33942-3640 RE: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER BID NO. 87-1068 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING FOR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AT GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY PARK Gentlemen: The undersigned, as BIDDER, hereby declares that he has examined the site of the work and informed himself fully in regard to all conditions pertaining to the place where the work is to be done; and that he has examined the Specifications for the work and the Documents hereto attached. The BIDDER further declares that the only persons , company or parties interested in this Proposal or the Contract to be entered into as principals are named herein; that this Proposal is made without connection with any other person, company or parties making Bid or Proposal ; and it is in all respect fair and in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The BIDDER further certifies that he as familiarized himself with the Federal, State and Local laws pertaining to the type of work proposed. The BIDDER proposes and agrees , if this Proposal is accepted, to Contract with the OWNER in the form of Contract specified, to furnish work in full, in complete accordance with shown, noted, described and reasonably intended requirements of these Plans ,:. Specifications , Contract Documents and all Addenda thereto for the following price: 44 TOTAL BASE BID: One Hundred and Eighty Nine Thousand and Five Hundred Dollars ( S189,500.00 Dollars ( $ TIME OF COMPLETION If awarded this contract, the undersigned will complete the work within 120 calendar days from the date of the notice to proceed. (NOTE: The Bidder shall insert the time of completion) . ADDENDUM RECEIPT Receipt of the following Addenda to the Contract Documents is acknowledged: Addendum No. 1 (One) Dated: Feb. 27, 1987 Addendum No. Dated: Addendum No. Dated: Addendum No. Dated: REFERENCES: (List a minimum of three ( 3 ) projects similar in scope and type of construction. ) Recreation Pavilion, River Park (City of Naples) 262-4225 Name Phone Medical Building for Dr. Jeannie Moran 262-4788 Name Phone • Redlands Christian Migrant Association 657-3125 Name Phone SUBCONTRACTORS TO BE USED: ( In no instance may subcontractor perform more than 49% of the total bid amount) . Siggs Air Conditioning 694-1205 Name Phone Wm. Roberts Electrical & Mechanical 394-3605 Name Phone Naples Steel 774-6900 Name Phone 45 The undersigned as BIDDER hereby certifies that his firm will be directly responsible for more than 50% of the bid amount for the proposed wo k. ZA2,, W t• ess i / � Darrell L. Bresee Name of Bidder Bi der ' s Signature President Title 643-4544 Phone March 11, 1987 Date 46 S E C T I O N 01400 CONTRACT PROPOSAL FORM TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE:March 11, 1987 County Purchasing Agent County Government Complex Naples, Florida 33962 FROM: GULFPOINT CONSTRUCTION CO. , INC. (Name of Bidder) 5585 Trailwinds Dr. 4313 (Address of Bidder) . Fort Myers, Florida 33907 RE: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER BID NO. 87-1068 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING FOR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AT GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY PARK Gentlemen: The undersigned, as BIDDER, hereby declares that he has examined the site of the work and informed himself fully in regard to all conditions pertaining to the place where the work is to be done; and that he has examined the Specifications for the work and the Documents hereto attached. The BIDDER further declares that the only persons , company or parties interested in this Proposal or the Contract to be entered into as principals are named herein; that this Proposal is made without connection with any other person, company or parties making Bid or Proposal; and it is in all respect fair and in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The BIDDER further c.--,4 s that he as fami1 = A,-izd himself with the Federal, State and Local laws pertaining to the type of work proposed. The BIDDER proposes and agrees , if this Proposal is accepted, to Contract with the OWNER in the form of Contract specified, to furnish work in full, in complete accordance with shown, noted, described and reasonably intended requirements of these Plans, Specifications , Contract Documents and all Addenda thereto for the following price: 44 a cn x m a ►- CI > 0. c D °�•. M 0. o y r, Co r N tY� R c' H 0 (D 0 0. 0 ro a o pO B w H n f , to ~ a Z I-' w 0 (p VI 'N Pb n p O n r tzf OM rt t` 0 el r y < �MMy Cl - H al w y o w I.. Cl• Cl to 0 :2 D H n r- t'll ".-. \ (O to CO p.. H 0. 0. H ••• r f, p k O I A- u) q pz, ,., N n \ _ O O a 0. a ■-• P r D3 n CT rt y ry a 0 'f 8 ro to aCD \;:r4 ❑ a a n a a < ..... n m r M = 0 a, Pb H ■' N m 0. •• 4 CD b t V N V N V, 'O OD Ib V (A (D ■ H