Loading...
Agenda 05/15/1986 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA May 15, 1986 The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will hold its monthly meeting on Thursday, May 15, 1986 at 9:00 a.m. on the 3rd floor of Building F at the Collier County Courthouse Complex. I. Call to Order II. Approval of Minutes III. Addendum IV. Old Business A. Naming of Community Parks V. New Business A. Monthly updated report on the community park progress B. Review of playground and site ammenities bid C. Review of equipment bids D. Special PARAB meeting to review Marco Island Community Park bids VI. Discussion of Addendum VII. Adjournment TSV:pc:D/4 Ammumummummir immermumnsumarmriummu s . Naples, Florida, April 17 , 1986 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board met on this date at 9 : 00 A.M. in Building "F" of the Collier County Courthouse Complex, East Naples, FLorida, with the following members present : VICE CHAIRMAN: Ron Burton Charles Stevens Steve Price Scott McQuillan ABSENT: Dan Monaco ALSO PRESENT : Carmen Ruiz, Deputy Clerk; Tim Vanatta, Parks & Recreation Director ; Murdo Smith, Dan Loubier , Parks & Recreation Department . AGENDA I . Call to Order CII . Approval of Minutes III . Addendum IV. Old Business A. Discussion on naming the five (5) community parks B. Construction update of the Community Parks V. New Business A. Bus lease for summer recreation program VI . Discussion of Addendum VII . Adjournment MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 1986 - APPROVED AS PRESENTED Mr. McQuillen moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried unani- mously, that the minutes of March 20, 1986, be approved as presented. ADDENDUM TO AGENDA - APPROVED Mr. McQuillen moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried unani- Page 1 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD APRIL 17, 1986 mously, that Item IV. A, Discussion on naming the five (5) community parks be heard after Items IV. B and V. A CONSTRUCTION UPDATE OF THE COMMUNITY PARKS Mr . Bob Furlong with Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll & Peek, made a presentation with pictures, site drawings and construction schedule on the progress of Golden Gate Park and North Naples Park. He stated that the yellow highlighting represents progress at Golden Gate, and the blue highlighting is progress at North Naples for the different contractors . He added that the duration of the contract is 36 weeks, and they are about 22 weeks along. He said that site preparation is completed in both parks - all clearing, underground utilities, etc . ; the electric contract is on schedule, but they will have to go back to set fixtures and test the system; buildings and shelters are pretty much on schedule and the contractor will be asked to provide an up- dated schedule on catching up; sidewalk contractor is also pretty much on schedule. He added that most of the irrigation lines are in; serious work can be started on the balifields since the light poles are installed and most of the fence is up. He said that the same contractor has the outdoor game courts and that contract is on schedule . Mr . Furlong stated that the limerock road and parking in Golden Gate is completed and the contractor has now moved to North Naples and started work there and is on schedule. He added that Golden Gate and North Naples are moving right along. Mr . Barton asked what the status is concerning the letting of contracts for Marco Island Park and East Naples Park, and Mr . Furlong said Marco Island Park will be advertised Thursday and Friday of next week, bids will be opened on the 16th - 3 weeks later - with construc- tion to start the end of July or early August with completion about this time next year . As concerns East Naples, Mr . Furlong said he received a reply from DER and they had many comments, some of which they both have to sit t Page 2 qt Cs) PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD APRIL 17 , 1986 _ down and review to find out what DER is asking for . He said that DER has a lot of concerns with the wetlands. He added that he really could not give a schedule on how long it would take to finish the per- mitting, but the completion report was received and a reply has to be submitted and permitting has to be completed. He added that his com- pany is trying to find out whether or not DER has any deep-seeded problems with the project as proposed; if DER does not have any problems, they will go ahead with the design and keep the schedule moving. Mr . Furlong said that Phase I , Part 2 has started at Immokalee ; clearing is being done which involves disking. Mr . Furlong added that completion is expected to be September or October. He said that they are adding to Phase I , Part 1 a maintenance area, an additional parking lot , a racquet center, one pair of tennis courts, two four- wall racquetball courts, a pair of basketball-volleyball courts, landscaping, and finishing off the field control center . He added that 4.7.) any delays may be due to the fact that the baseball field was put out on its own contract and there was a lot of interest in getting work started in some of the other parks, so that priorities were shifted to those other parks. Mr. Barton suggested that a monthly report be submitted to this Advisory Board, just a brief summary, on what the status is on all the parks . Mr . Furlong produced a set of drawings for the Immokalee Park and proceeded to explain the different layouts . Mr . Vanatta stated that Parks & Recreation has been directed by the Board of County Commissioners to bid what Parks & Recreation feels is in excess of the amount presently available and that direction has to be carried out . Mr . Furlong stated that proposals are being set to give contractors flexibility to increase prices. Mr . Barton stated that even though the Board of County Commissioners has given this direction, there are priorities and if one item comes over the bid, that item will be cut, Page 3 • PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD APRIL 17, 1986 not part of the other items. Mr . Vanatta stated that the monthly status reports will be sub- mitted beginning next month and thereafter monthly, prior to the Advisory Board meetings . NEW BUSINESS - BUS LEASE FOR SUMMER RECREATION PROGRAM - APPROVED Mr . Vanatta stated he submitted a copy of the agreement between the County and the School Board for review by the Board. He said that this agreement has been in effect for several years, and the price is exactly the same as last year . The purpose of this agreement is to transport children in the summer recreational programs through the County. Mr. Vanatta added that it is a pretty standard agreement , but to be consistant with policy it is being presented to this Board for its review before going to the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. McQuillen moved, seconded by Mr. Price, and carried unani- mously that the contract for Bus Lease for the Summer Recreation Program be recommended for approval . DISCUSSION ON NAMING THE FIVE (5) COMMUNITY PARKS Mr . Vanatta stated that at the last Parks & Recreation Advisory Board meeting, a vote was taken to reopen the issue of renaming the parks . The issue was presented to the Board of County Commissioners to see if they desired to reopen it , in which case this Advisory Board would be happy to have an open meeting on it . He said that the Board of County Commissioners stated that it would be a good idea and in addition they asked Parks & Recreation to get in contact with the Board of Education to give the children an opportunity to recommend names . Mr . Vanatta said that his office contacted Dr . Richey' s office and Dr . Richey said that the Board of Education would try to help as much as possible . Mr . Vanatta mentioned that any recommen- dations would have to be submitted by 5 o ' clock on Wednesday for review by this Board; however, three of the schools were unable to respond - East Naples, Immokalee and North Naples . He added that there are some suggestions for the Golden Gate site and the Marco Page 4 4:4 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD APRIL 17 , 1986 Island site which this Board presently has . Mr . Barton stated that the first site to be discussed will be Golden Gate and asked if there was anyone in the audience who wanted to give input? Mr . & Mrs. Melchore asked why, at this point , it has been suggested that it be called something other than Golden Gate Community Park? Mr . Vanatta gave a brief explanation of prior events which lead to this public hearing. Mr . Price added that there was some concern that the park serves a broader area and should have a name not associated with Golden Gate . Mr . Barton commented that the original names of the community parks were not names but geographical designations and after the bond issue was completed it was decided that it was easiest to keep those names and not cause confusion. He added that when the parks were first called Golden Gate Community Park and so forth, it was not really a fixed name. Mr . Vanatta added that in February of last year those names were adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. 4; However, he said that part of the contract with Power Corporation, the company from p y whom the land was acquired, was that they have input in 4 naming Golden Gate Community Park. Mr . Barton added that Power Corporation was to be notified in writing at the time the park was to be named and never was, so at this time the County is complying with the agreement . Mr. Stevens noted his objection and stated that the issue of naming the parks had previously been settled by the Board of County Commissoners when they first voted on it . Mr . John Agnelli , Vice President of Power Corporation, stated that the park site never was a part of Golden Gate. He added that it was reported in the newspapers that the County paid a premium to Power Corporation for the land and that is not so, the County paid a fair price for the land. He said that the site consists of 40 acres at the southeast corner of Santa Barbara Blvd. and Radio Road. He said that Power Corporation was told in writing that it would have an oppor- tunity to give input in naming the park. He stated that Power Page 5 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD w_ APRIL 17 , 1986 ® Corporation feels that this ark will p serve ten other developments, 10, 000 living units, that are not in Golden Gate, so why not give it a more generic name . He added that the name "Santa Barbara Park" is good name because that is where it is located. As an example, Mr . Agnelli stated that since there is an existing Golden Gate Community Park, in case of an emergency - a hurricane - people might confuse the two sites and go to the wrong place . Mr . Agnelli stated that his recommendation is that it be called "Santa Barbara Park" and in small letters "Golden Gate Community. " Mr . Stevens stated that some suggestions received from the schools are: Golden Park, Panther Park, Rock Road Park, Cypress Bend, Alligator Park, Middle Park, Falcon' s Nest , Sunrise Park and Santa Barbara. Mr. McQuillen moved that the park be named "Santa Barbara Boulevard Park" and in parenthesis "Golden Gate Area" underneath. Motion died for lack of a second. CMr. Stevens moved, seconded by Mr. Price and carried unanimously, to approve a recommendation that the park now known as Golden Gate Community Park be renamed to "Santa Barbara Park" and underneath "Golden Gate Community. " Mr . Barton at this point asked if there was anyone in the audience, or any Board members, that had any suggestions other than calling the park in Immokalee, "Immokalee Community Park"? Mr . Price stated there were no suggestions from anyone in Immokalee and he did not think there were any objections to the present name. Mr. McQuillen moved, seconded by Mr. Price and carried unani- mously, that the name "Immokalee Community Park" be recommended for approval . Mr. Barton asked if anyone in the audience, or any Board members, had any suggestions other than calling the North Naples Park "North Naples Community Park"? Mr . Vanatta stated that he had spoken to Mr . Monaco and at this point no one had contacted him with suggestions . Mr. Price moved, seconded by Mr. McQuillen and carried unani- i,. Page 6 . r 4:; PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD APRIL 17, 1986 mously, that the name "North Naples Community ommunity Park" be retained and recommended for approval . " Mr . Barton asked if anyone in the audience, or any Board members, had any suggestions other than calling the East Naples Park "East Naples Community Park"? Mr. McQuillen moved, seconded by Mr. Stevens and carried unani- mously, that the name "East Naples Community Park" be retained and recommended for approval . " Mr . Barton asked if anyone in the audience, or any Board members, 4 had any suggestions other than calling the park on Marco Island "Marco Island Community Park"? Mr . Barton stated that the school children suggested it be called Eagle Lake Park, Eagle Park, or Island Classic Park. He further stated that he tried to talk to people who he thought might have wanted input and came up with nothing other than what it is presently called. Mr. Price moved, seconded by Mr. McQuillen and carried unani- mously, that the name "Marco Island Community Park" be retained and recommended for approval . " ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time : 10 : 15 A.M. PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Ron Burton, Vice Chairman Page 7 DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS Item IV. A. Naming of Community Parks At the Board of County Commissioner's (BCC) meeting on April 29th the North Naples Community Park, East Naples Community Park and Immokalee Community 7 Park names were retained for the respective park sites. The Golden Gate Community Park name is to remain the same, however, the sub-caption of 'Santa Barbara Blvd. ' will be displayed on all signs, pamphlets, brochures, etc. for identification purposes. Lastly, it was recommended that the Marco Island Community Park site be discussed once again at the May PARAB meeting. This is due to the fact that additional suggestions were made after the April PARAB meeting. Consequently, a discussion needs to be held to decide whether to retain its present name of Marco Island Community Park or recommend to the BCC another name. Item V. A. Monthly updated report on the Community Park progress Per the PARAB suggestion, a written report on the progress of the community parks has been submitted for your review. Any questions on this report need to be asked at this time. Item V. B. Review of playground and site ammenities bid Playground and site ammenities bids for all community parks were opened April 18th. It was felt by the Design Team that by bulk bidding these items and storing them at the Parks Maintenance Barn versus ordering this equipment individually as parks were being completed, a substantial savings would be recognized. The Design Team feels that this has been a successful method. The Design Team has reviewed all items and recommend the respective vendors for the following items (see attached). Item V. C. Review of equipment bids A memo is attached from Murdo Smith, Park Superintendent explaining the bids. These items have been budgeted for and are necessary to tool up for the maintenance of our new community park sites. Item V. D. Special PARAB meeting to review Marco Island Community park bids The Marco Island Community Park bids will be opened on May 23rd. The BCC's last meeting before they recess for a month is June 17th. The June PARAB meeting is scheduled for June 19th, consequently, a special meeting to review these bids will be necessary so that staff can place this item on the BCC Agenda prior to their month recess. My suggestion would be to have a special meeting between Monday, June 2nd and Friday, June 6th. Please review your calendar prior to this meeting so a time can be set. TSV:pc:D/4 o a WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK, INC. �Q MEMORANDUM DATE: May 8 , 1986 TO: Tim S . Vanatta, Director Collier County Parks and Recreation Department FROM: Robert E. Furlong Wilson, Miller, ,Barton, Soll & Peek , Inc. SUBJECT: Collier County Community Parks Update Summary GOLDEN GATE Status: Under Construction Estimated Completion Date: July 31 , 1986 (park open) Contracts Status 1 . BP1 - Site Preparation 100% complete 2 . BP2 - Site Electric 80% complete - remaining work : CBuildings electric, aim recreational lighting, collars for ballfield lightpoles, set parking lot lights. 3 . BP3 - Buildings and Shelters 40% complete - remaining work: Roofing, exterior and interior finishes. 4 . BP4 - Sitework Finishes 60% complete - remaining work : Fine grade ballfields, complete fencing, irrigation system and landscaping. 5 . BP5 - Outdoor Game Courts 70% complete - remaining work : Miscellaneous finishes. 6 . BP6 - Paving 40% complete - remaining work: Asphalt for roads and parking, limerock and asphalt for side- walks. Q mommommimmarmummilmw NORTH NAPLES Status: Under Construction Estimated Completion Date: July 31 , 1986 (park open) Contracts Status 1 . BP1 - Site Preparation 100% complete 2 . BP2 - Site Electric 80% complete - remaining work : Buildings electric, aim recreational lighting, collars for ballfield lightpoles. 3 . BP3 - Buildings and 35% complete - remaining work: Shelters Masonry walls, roofing, exterior and interior finishes. 4 . BP4 - Sitework Finishes 60% complete - remaining work : Fine grade ballfields, complete fencing, irrigation system and landscaping. 5 . BP5 - Outdoor Game Courts 70% complete - remaining work : Miscellaneous finishes. 6 . BP6 - Paving 20% complete - remaining work: Partial limerock roads, subbase grade and limerock parking and sidewalks, and asphalt. CI) IMMORALEE Status: Under Construction Estimated Completion Date: October 18 , 1986 Contracts Status 1 . BP1 - Site Preparation 85% complete - remaining work : Miscellaneous grading and drainage 2 . BP2 - Site Electric Work not started 3. BP3 - Buildings and Work not started Shelters 4. BP4 - Sitework Finishes Work not started 5 . BP5 - Outdoor Game Courts Work not started 6. BP6 - Paving Work not started MARCO ISLAND 4:) Status: Out for Bids, Bid Opening May 23, 1986 Estimated Begin Construction: August 11 , 1986 Estimated Completion Date: May 8 , 1987 EAST NAPLES Status: Design/permitting C s o', a WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK, INC. COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY PARKS SITE AMENITIES RECOMMENDATION F R AWARD OF CONTRACT MAY 9, 1986 RECOMMEND AWARD TO: AMOUNT COLUMBIA CASCADE $103,190.00 SWARTZ & ASSOC. $ 43,157.00 HASNER & ASSOC. $ 27,576.00 HUNTER/KNEPSHIELD $ 5,610.00 TOTAL BID AMOUNT $179,533.00 ALLOTTED BUDGET $204,000.00 BALANCE FCR IN-HOUSE INSTALLATION $ 24,467.00 1 of 3 C • , a WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLI & PEEK, INC. COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY PARKS SITE AMENITIES RECOMMENDATION FOR AWARD OF CONTRACT MAY 9, 1986 CHILDREN'S PLAY EQUIPMENT : Award to : COLUMBIA CASCADE (Douglas fir) Lowest Bidder to comply with specs. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST AMOUNT TIMBERFCRM: STRUCTURE #4038 5 $ 6,840.00 $ 34,200.00 STRUCTURE #4084 1 $ 15,375.00 $ 15,375.00 STRUCTURE #4076 1 $ 14,630.00 $ 14,630.00 STRUCTURE #4069 1 $ 13,530.00 $ 13,530.00 STRUCTURE #4049 2 $ 11,815.00 $ 23,630.00 STRUCTURE #1672/1620 1 $ 1,825.00 $ 1,825.00 SUB-TOTAL CHILDREN'S PLAY EQUIPMENT $103,190.00 BLEACHERS : Award to : SWARTZ & ASSOC. Lowest Bidder to comply with specs. DANT: 3 ROW 10 $ 480.00 $ 4,800.00 5 ROW 28 $ 820.00 $ 22,960.00 SUB-TOTAL BLEACHERS $ 27,760.00 AMENITIES/TRASH RECEPTACLES : Award to : HASNER & ASSOC. Lowest Bidder to comply with specs. IRON MT. FORGE: PERMANENT (INSTALLATION) 114 $ 88.00 $ 10,032.00 PCRTABLE 15 $ 91.00 $ 1,365.00 SUB-TOTAL TRASH RECEPTACLES $ 11,397.00 2 of 3 J t o • - WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLI & PEEK, INC. C v COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY PARKS SITE AMENITIES RECOMMENDATION FOR AWARD OF CONTRACT MAY 9, 1986 PICNIC TABLES : Award to : HASNER & ASSOC. Lowest Bidder to canply with specs. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST AMOUNT IRON MT. FORGE: WHEELCHAIR 10 $ 144.00 $ 1,440.00 STANDARD 81 $ 124.00 $ 10,044.00 SUB-TOTAL PICNIC TABLES $ 11,484.00 BENCHES : Award to : SWARTZ & ASSOC. Lowest Bidder to canply with specs. DuMoor: #60-320-6XR 89 $ 173.00 $ 15,397.00 GRILLS : Award to : HASNER & ASSOC. Lowest Bidder IRON MT. FCRGE: GROUP 20 $ 183.00 $ 3,660.00 SINGLE 18 $ 57.50 $ 1,035.00 1 SUB-TOTAL GRIT.TS $ 4,695.00 BIKE RACKS : Award to : HUNTER/KNEPS HIELD Lowest Bidder to canply with specs. QUALITY INDUSTRIES: #6909 22 $ 255.00 $ 5,610.00 SUB-'DOTAL BLEACHERS & AMENITIES $ 76,343.00 3 of 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Tim S. Vanatta, Parks and Recreation Director FROM: Murdo Smith, Park Superintendent DATE: May 9, 1986 SUBJECT: Bid #86-967, Park Maintenance Equipment Bids were opened on May 2nd for the following Equipment: 2 Riding Reel Mowers 3 Three Wheel Trucksters 1 Top Dressing Machine 1 Fertilizer Spreader 1 Fifty Gallon Sprayer 150 2 Trailers We received nine bids, six of which were no bids. Of the three bids, DeBra Tractor was low at $41,025, however, they did not bid on all of the equipment. B & W Golf Carts was next at $43,724, however, many of the items did not meet the specficiations. Wesco-Zaun's bid was $44,622 and their bid did meet all specifications, thus we are recommending Wesco-Zaun be awarded bid #86-967 in the amount of $44,622. In making our recommendation we reviewed the specifications and bids submitted with ARA services and Fleet Management and the award of bid is based on their recommendations as well as our experience with the equipment. Reasons for the recommendation of the above mentioned equipment is as follows: Reel Mowers - Low bid was submitted by DeBra. This was a Jacobson Turf King 84 price $6,595. Wesco-Zaun was second low with a Toro Super Pro 81 at $6,856. ARA and Fleet Managemenet recommended the TORO because of good maintenance records and we have several in our fleet already and ARA is qualified and experienced in performing maintenance on these pieces of equipment. Three Wheel Trucksters - Of the three bids, Wesco-Zaun was the only bidder who met all specifications with a Cushman 530 and Scarifier for a price of $7,623. The low bidder B & W Golf Carts did not meet specifications on engine size (18 hp versus 22 hp), load capacity (1500 versus 1900) and no scarifier. The second low bidder which was DeBra was a Smithco Runaway and ARA and Fleet Management did not recommend them because of past maintenance records of Smithco Equipment. Of the attachments for the truckster, top dresser, fertilizer and sprayer, Wesco-Zaun was low on all except for the fertilizer spreader. The low bidder, however, did not bid the specified piece of equipment. The attachment specified was a Vicon PS 402 and the low bidder bid a Vicon PS 4(;) 302. This is a smaller piece of equipment. ARA and Fleet Management and our department felt it would be advantageous to acquire the attachments low - made for the trucksters recommended, as no conversion kits and adapters would be needed to make attachments compatible to the truckster recommended. Trailers - Two bids were received for trailers. B & W was low, however, they did not meet the specifications. The size was smaller and it had a tilt bed instead of a ramp. ARA recommended the ramp because of different heights of hitches we have on our trucks. Also the load capacity of the low bid did not meet specifications. Attached is tabulations of bids for your review. If you have any questions, please advise. MS:pc:D/3 C 4111 -MEMORANDUM- DATE: May 9, 1986 TO: Murdo Smith; Parks Superindendant FROM: Dan Pucher; Fleet Management Coordinator RE: Bid #86-967 As per your request, the equipment specified under Bid #86-967 has been reviewed from a maintenance standpoint. The Toro Reel Mower is recommended over the Jacobson due to parts availability and poor maintenance history of the Jacobson mower line. The Toro Mower would offer a standardization of parts and equipment. Maintenance personnel are currently familiar and trained on Toro Mowers. The Cushman-Truckster was recommended over the EZ-GO and Smithco Trucksters due to parts availability, uniformity and maintenance familiarity. Cushman meets the 22 horse power specified minimum and offers a 1900 pound payload versus the Smithco and EZ-GO 1500 pound payloads, 20HP and 18HP engines. The Cushman attachments are low bid and would eliminate a need for any converter packages. The only trailer bid that meets specifications is the Snowco trailer. Please contact this office for any further assistance. DP/kac R TABULATION SHEET Bid /186-967 - PARK MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT May 2, 1986 0 �1QraGG p � M.� , 114324 Z Atr.K.. a o ��+� 1'S 2 81" riding reel mowers ` (prs'Cl� l3 7 Q�� Make & Model No. �7cc�;� �'.- S�4G (.)7o9 �tb� r Z cwIIL7 ��� Delivery Time 7.D a3G Literature enc. '/� �/ �� 3 Three wheel turf trucksters � � 7 1 G`/ 4x4/ Siff Nat Make & Model No. .�IINI*t. 400 Zs-LO e ,!3_r*Cl-do at-? Delivery time � P�w� 2/ Literature enc. dt4 Yds stri 1 Top Dressing Machine Zt{00 It(01,0 Z49, Make & Model No. 11/44.40 F_AO Cita 21*M. ? óo_ .P Delivery Time SC0 .3C) 21 Literature Enc. Vats ye. y 1 Fertilizer Spreader '` 06-1 ri i 919 Make & Model No. ✓ LOX 3�eL /rto0 �40Z y�dx a‘102. Delivery Time ,�p 30 Z! { Literature Enc. 0 3 1 150 gal Spray Rig 2 I ZOO __2_010.__ ■Make & Model No. tor— 'Sfl�Y Q �r! fle�•,$' •�f Z=e(O Delivery Time 30 7 .p ' 21 Literature Enc. 1 Es Ye. y 2 Trailers OD ? 99D / 7 a Make & Model No. AJec0 20.6 0,30 _I_{1 4 s8. Delivery Time 30 Z1 Literature Enc. OS ,/.s mf 1 Ela 3.-20o 444.., Terms: 010` 4 d© y 2z * tii 4-1 .3,'6 dud �� y 7, l : Pica AA i 64.4046iA i"RAcivait,,® t LoAs444... —+ a o 13,'0® ;Y' , d '-‘441TRAcA.012. No ilia vu No 4:1 c,o Witness: