Loading...
HEX Backup 03/10/2016COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER HEARINGS BACKUP DOCUMENTS MARCH 10, 2016 AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY, MARCH 10, 2016 IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING & REGULATION BUILDING, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF - ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF PRIOR MEETING MINUTES: February 11, 2016 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. PETITION NO. BDE- PL20150000039 — A. Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Bradman request a 22.8 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42.8 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with a boat lift for the benefit of Lot 6, Bayfront Gardens, also described as 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Daniel J. Smith AICP, Principal Planner] B. PETITION NO. BD- PL20150001024 - Mike Scott requests a 42.7 -foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.7 feet, to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, also described as 206 San Mateo Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Rachel Beasley, Planner] 5. OTHER BUSINESS 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS 7. ADJOURN HEX 3 -10 -2016 BIDE— PI,2015000039 BAREFOOT BEACH Ann P. Jennejohn _ From: BeasleyRachel <RachelBeasley @colIiergov.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 11:12 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: Smith, Daniel; Ann P. Jennejohn; Bellows, Ray, Bosi, Michael; Kendall, Marcia; Lang, Ashley; Neet, Virginia; Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: 232 Barefoot Beach Advertisement Request Attachments: 232 Barefoot Beach Advertisement Request.docx; 232 Barefoot Beach (2x3) Map.pdf; Signature Page.pdf Good morning, Please advertise the 232 Barefoot Beach Boat Dock Extension petition attachments for the March 10, 2016, HEX hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department - Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 Co`��'fer �r�.rity Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. February 02, 2016 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on February 19, 2016, and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Daniel Smith, Principal Planner, Zoning Services in the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 114 pane advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section} FUND & COST CENTER: 131 - 138326 - 649100 -00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number: 076397 Authorized Designee signatuM for HEX Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples F134104, to consider: PETITION NO. BDE- PL20150000039 — A. Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Brodman request a 22.8 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5 ,03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42.8 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with a boat lift for the benefit of Lot 6, Bayfront Gardens, also described as 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356,(239) 252 -8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida 0aoaor z D � r- 0 =mom o 0 d Oalx�� r m CO > m mmm m0� o C7 O C 0 Z o o � 00 D ;0 00 D ��m CO z =Z � 0Cc) �C0 oz r V r- m ao - 0 D m v �� c z ccn> m z vmi 0 VANDERBILT D IVE D L (C. .901 rn O C) z m m Z � mm o00c m m D C Z C 0 m W CO 2 CO z n -r D � OD m Nmo 1 IW`dlWdl 0 D X co sZ <p S > ; a o 8� 5r7 N Z m r G7 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P. Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 12:38 PM To: 'BeasleyRachel' Cc: Smith, Daniel; Kendall, Marcia; Neet, Virginia; Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: RE: 232 Barefoot Beach Advertisement Request Hi Racket, As soon as tine proof is sent from NDN it will be forwarded for staff's review and Final approval. TkaKk you. Ann JenKejokK, Deputy Clerk Clerk of tke, Circuit Court Clerk to tine Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept From: BeasleyRachel [ mai Ito: Rachel Beasley @colliergov.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 11:12 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: Smith, Daniel; Ann P. Jennejohn; Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael; Kendall, Marcia; Lang, Ashley; Neet, Virginia; Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: 232 Barefoot Beach Advertisement Request Good morning, Please advertise the 232 Barefoot Beach Boat Dock Extension petition attachments for the March 10, 2016, HEX hearing. Sincerely, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department — Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 C;C #ier C'014MY Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Neet, Virginia Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 8:26 AM To: Crotteau, Kathynell Cc: Minutes and Records Subject: RE: 232 Barefoot Beach Advertisement Request Thank you! From: CrotteauKathynell Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 8:26 AM To: NeetVirginia Cc: StoneScott Subject: FW: 232 Barefoot Beach Advertisement Request Dinny: Title is correct per 10.28.15 Title in TO. XaAl y CrotteaI4 legalSecretary Office of t6ie Coiner County Attorney 2800 .Voroi 3lorseslioe Drive, Suite 201 .Nam %s, 7Z 34104 P`ione.• (239) 252-8400 k-atliynedc- rotteauc&coller oft From: NeetVirginia Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 4:54 PM To: CrotteauKathynell Subject: FW: 232 Barefoot Beach Advertisement Request Kathy: Would you please confirm the title? Dinny From: BeasleyRachel Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 11:12 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: SmithDaniel; Ann P. Jennejohn; BellowsRay; BosiMichael; KendallMarcia; LangAshley; NeetVirginia; RodriguezWanda Subject: 232 Barefoot Beach Advertisement Request Good morning, Please advertise the 232 Barefoot Beach Boat Dock Extension petition attachments for the March 10, 2016, HEX hearing. Acct #076397 February 3, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples News Media 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 Re: BDE- PL20150000039 — Barefoot Beach BDE (Display Ad w/Map) Dear Legals: Please advertise the above Display Ad w/Map Friday, February 19, 2016 and send duplicate Affidavits of Publication, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teresa Cannon, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500161942 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on February 19, 2016, and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Minutes & Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #401, Naples, Florida 34112. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section} FUND & COST CENTER: 131 - 138326- 649100 -00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number: 076397 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples F134104, to consider: PETITION NO. BDE- PL20150000039 — A. Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Brodman request a 22.8 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42.8 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with a boat lift for the benefit of Lot 6, Bayfront Gardens, also described as 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 4101, Naples, Florida 34112 -5356, (239) 252 -8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida §§§§ £® A®® ^ \ §§§ e / ! j J- |$§ )� § \E� |$ul 9| &2§ kq § `" z � }� `!■ gg Teresa L. Cannon From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori @naplesnews.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 2:05 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: BDE- PL20150000039 - Barefoot Beach Confirmed receipt. Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist O: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.gori(a)NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 'apirs B 'News From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon @collierclerk.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 8:59 AM To: Legals NDN <legals @JMG.onmicrosoft.com >; Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori @naplesnews.com> Subject: BDE- PL20150000039 - Barefoot Beach Legals, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w /Map on Friday, February 19, 2016. Thanks Teresa Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes & Records Department 239 - 252 -8411 239 - 252 -8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com Please visit us on the web at www.colliercierk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailing helpdesk@collierclerk.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents. The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Teresa L. Cannon From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori @naplesnews.com> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 9:32 AM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: Proof 927143 Attachments: NDNB927143.pdf Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist O: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.gori(a)NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 INIDPIASNOW&COM PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HE)Q at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FI 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. BDE- PL20150000039 - A. Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Brodman request a 22.8 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42.8 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with a boat lift for the benefit of Lot 6, Bayfront Gardens, also described as 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. LITTLE LEE COUNTY HICKOR Y BONITA BEACH ROAD (C.R. BB5) IELY BAREFOOT CON O LELY PROJECT BAREFOOT LOCATION BEAd1 g 5 BONITA SNORES AUDUSON COUNTRY CLUB r .h o &L .�e O GE AVDUBON Nl1A COUNTRY BAY CUB STERLING in B FOREST i OAKS 9 lY 0 np THE LAKES WATERGLADES RETREAT PLAZA ON EDEA P ARBOR MACE NLLAGE PLACE All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Naples, Florida 34112 -5356, (239) 252 -8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No 927143 February 19. 2016 Teresa L. Cannon From: Teresa L. Cannon Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 9:34 AM To: Neet, Virginia; BeasleyRachel (Rachel Beasley @colIiergov.net); Smith, Daniel Subject: FW: Proof 927143 Attachments: NDNB927143.pdf Please review From: God, Ivonne [ma i Ito: ivonne.gori(anaplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 9:32 AM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: Proof 927143 Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist O: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne..qori(a)_NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 Nepkmwews corn Teresa L. Cannon From: BeasleyRachel <RachelBeasley @colIiergov.net> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 1:49 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon; Rodriguez, Wanda; Neet, Virginia; Smith, Daniel Subject: RE: Proof 927143 Looks good to me From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto: Teresa. Can non(abcollierclerk.com] Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 12:27 PM To: RodriguezWanda; NeetVirginia; BeasleyRachel; SmithDaniel Subject: FW: Proof 927143 With your internet issues Friday, I am sending this again for review. Thanks From: Teresa L. Cannon Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 9:34 AM To: Neet, Virginia; BeasleyRachel (Rachel Beasley(dcol I iergov. net); Smith, Daniel Subject: FW: Proof 927143 Please review From: Gori, Ivonne [ mailto :ivonne.gori(gbnaplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 9:32 AM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: Proof 927143 Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist O: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.goriCo)NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 T ews orn Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Teresa L. Cannon From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 8:37 AM To: Neet, Virginia; Teresa L. Cannon Cc: Stone, Scott; BeasleyRachel Subject: RE: Proof 927143 Teresa, Thanks for forwarding the ad request to me; the proof looks good to me. Dinny, You can disregard the below, I've reviewed it. Wanda Rodriguez, .ACP .Advanced Certified ParaCegaC Office of the County .Attorney (239) 252 -8400 From: RodriguezWanda Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 8:05 AM To: NeetVirginia Cc: 'Teresa L. Cannon' Subject: FW: Proof 927143 Dinny, I don't have the ad request on this one, can you look at it? 'Wanda Rodriguez, MCP .Advanced Certified ParaCegaC Office of the County .Attorney (239) 252-8400 From: Teresa L. Cannon [ ma ilto:Teresa. Cannon (&col lierclerk.com] Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 8:01 AM To: RodriguezWanda Subject: FW: Proof 927143 Hi Wanda, I know you have been busy since getting back but can I get an ok on this soon. Racheal reviewed it already, I'm just waiting on your office. Thanks From: God, Ivonne [ma i Ito: ivonne.gori @naplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 9:32 AM Teresa L. Cannon To: Gori, Ivonne Subject: RE: Proof 927143 Looks good, ok to run! Thanks From: Gori, Ivonne [ mailto :ivonne.gori @naplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 9:32 AM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: Proof 927143 Please find attached a proof for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist O: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.goriCcD.NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 N- apIr:14"'IM11; lriu!5 Na;AesNews(:o,--- Teresa L. Cannon From: Sent: To: Subject: This will do, thanks. Released. Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori @naplesnews.com> Thursday, February 11, 2016 12:10 PM Teresa L. Cannon RE: Ad #927143 & #926936 Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist O: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.gori(cD-NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 From: Teresa L. Cannon [ mailto: Teresa.Cannon @collierclerk.com] Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:03 AM To: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori @naplesnews.com> Subject: Ad #927143 & #926936 Hi Ivonne, I just sent to you the ok for Ad #927143, did you also receive the ok I sent last week for Ad #926936 Teresa Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes & Records Department 239 - 252 -8411 239 - 252 -8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@colliercierk.com Please visit us on the web at www.colliercierk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailing helpdesk@collierclerk.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents. The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. i 14A» Friday,F,ebruary 19,2016 N NAPLES DAILY NEWS NOTICE OF PU Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9 :00 A.M., on Thursday, March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's, Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FI 34104, to consider: PETITION N0. BDE- PL20150000039 — A. Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Brodman request a 22.8 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42.8 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with a boat lift for the benefit of Lot 6, Bayfront Gardens, also described as 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. in Section 6, Township 48 South,'Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are, entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the,Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Naples, Florida 34112 -5356, (239) 252 -8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No. 927143 FE,brusry 19.2018 until LEE COUNTY "e °"Y SMITE MACH ROAD teams) Lit, BARDMI BEACH C0NW LELY PROJECT BAFONT LOCATION •9EACN. 5 rA AUB4iLW w C caarmY aa+e r 8 NLLLAGE CCUN KM aus BAY VERM 6 TaKgT 9 . NATUMACES RE ,T '. PLAZA Q9N EO aN nc DAY ARBOR 1RACE VILLAGE ,TALE. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are, entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the,Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Naples, Florida 34112 -5356, (239) 252 -8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No. 927143 FE,brusry 19.2018 NapttS :4) *tlj NaplesNews.com BY � Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier Coun- ty, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copy line COLLIER COUNTY HEX Pub Dates February 19, 2016 (Sign ure of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me This :T.16 (Signatur of affiant) 927143 PUBLIC HEARING WONNE GORI �. No Public State of Florida = Commission • FF 900870 My Comm. Expires Jul 16. 2019 n... aanded through National Wary Asm. P.O.# 0) 0 Z +.mss 7 W U d Q J � m .O Q v z Q a N C O N N � C a) d O U C 0 2 -0 0) a) N Q Q C LC) N M X N 01 Z M Z L N E 7 a) Z Q EO Z _O O N N O Q S Cn L) W r 0 N /-, 4 C Cpl � lrrlrrlr� e �► M L/a� t ssiAaf, to W �f LL P� Ih LL 14AN Friday. February 19.2016) NAPLES DAILY NEWS Probe: El Faro second mate texted storm warning to captain Byfasen Mann and tested El Faro Capt. -- - A crew of Polish sailors ofmonths before El Faros AssmhmtlP� Michael Davidson to was aboard the El Faro, last voyage. make sure he was aware working to prepare it for A broken wind speed Before the freighter El of it. 15. Tem re lust South of Estero rkwy. its upcoming move to the gauge presented few dif- Faro sank, the captain "He came back to me Alaskatrade, hme` id,and 6culties for experienced was warned by a text and said yes, and thank the slower route was ex- mariners, Baird said. message from his vaca- you, "Baird said. "WhenI petted to be smoother so "I can probably esti- tioning second mate that saw it had developed into they could work. mate it within 5 knots," a storm looming offshore a Category l hurricane, I A Polish crew was he said was forecast to become a tested him again (to ask) aboard the El Faro when Not much could dis- hurricane, according to what his plan was going it set sail during Joaquin suade Tote's caRtains testimony Thursday. to be." too, yet the more direct from setting sail and Second Mate Charles Davidson texted that route closer to the storm getting their cargo deliv- Baird testified before a he planned to follow his was chosen. eyed, Baird said. While U.S. Coast Guard panel normal route but would While en route to arriving on time was im- in Jacksonville investi- skirt "under," or south, of Puerto Rico, Davidson portent, Baird said there gating the shipps sinking Hurricane Joaquin, Baird emailed company offi- were no penalties for late Iasi October. The AP cov- ered the hearing via a live said. The captain had used cials the day before the El Faro sank, asking if delivery. "Was there ever any in- webcast. a different approach dur- Charles Baird, former second mate of the El Faro, left, and he could take the slower stance where did you not All 33 aboard, includ- ing another strong storm Capt. Mike Kucharski, with the National Transportation Safety route home. A company sail from port because ing three men from Lee justabout amontheadier, Boarddiscuss route options available to the El Faro when officialsaid yes. of adverse, bad weath- County, died after the Baird said. dealing with the approaching hurricane during a Thursday Testimony also re- er," asked Capt. Michael vessel lost propulsion Davidson had rerouted hearing investigating the ship's October sinking. vealed that the El Faro Kucharski, a National and was hit by the strong to a slower, safer route in may have been sailing Transportation Safety winds of Hurricane Jos- August during Tropical officials with the compa- Baird said it was his the without the aid of awind Board marine accident quin, a Category storm. Storm Erika after a com- ny that owns the ships, idea to sail the slower speed called an investigator participat- Baird said he was at pany alert was sent out. Tote Services Inc., have route through the Old anemometer. ing in the panel. home when he saw news No company alert was said they don't routinely Bahama Channel during Baird said it had not No, we always sailed," ofthe storm on television sent out for Joaquin, and send out warnings. Erika. been working for acouple Baird said. ORCHID CAi,F SALE DAYS - WED., FEB. 17TH THRU SUN., FEB. 21ST Hundreds to 1 OFF Choose From: I Dendmbums, r Phahenopsis, P cauleyas, Paphiopedilum, of or o Oncidium, Vandal, Masdevallia varieties orchids 0' r a ream ome eou o chills ".In artay Voted #1 '� = of colors nd sizes GARDEN mno<kw�<r,,,a, CENI`'ER "' " " "°"'�" DRIFTWOOD ' NAPLES 261 -03280 sltGh NOI.N rik ESTER0947 - %76 5051 tammmi Trail N. o r.., 11 Hme Mak f[ He 2007 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PETITION NO. BDE- PL20150000039 - A Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Brodman request a 22.8 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42.8 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with a boat lift for the benefit Of Lot 6, Bayhoat Gardens, also described as 232 Barefoot Beech Blvd. in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida A.R.A. INSURANCE Premiums Gone Through the Roof? Slash your homeowners premium by combining homeowners & "1l wind coverage into one policy ? A while receiving maximum , y 11 mitigation credits. we can insure homes uptB;v (I� $15 Million with wind coverage included. Jim Bonfitto Tracy Stolinas Joe Bennett S83 Tallwood Street #102 • Marco Island, FL. PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HE)) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 1081, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. BD- PL20150001024- Mike Scott requests a 42.7 -foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.7 feet, to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, also described as 206 San Mateo Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida MCOUNTY 4 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tam iami Tail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112 -5356, (239) 252 -8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida Na 93.10 February l9 2016 lut Soelh f P e a doR, mwm.lkNhra•tlgrrdelradersam 15. Tem re lust South of Estero rkwy. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PETITION NO. BDE- PL20150000039 - A Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Brodman request a 22.8 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42.8 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with a boat lift for the benefit Of Lot 6, Bayhoat Gardens, also described as 232 Barefoot Beech Blvd. in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida A.R.A. INSURANCE Premiums Gone Through the Roof? Slash your homeowners premium by combining homeowners & "1l wind coverage into one policy ? A while receiving maximum , y 11 mitigation credits. we can insure homes uptB;v (I� $15 Million with wind coverage included. Jim Bonfitto Tracy Stolinas Joe Bennett S83 Tallwood Street #102 • Marco Island, FL. PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HE)) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 1081, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. BD- PL20150001024- Mike Scott requests a 42.7 -foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.7 feet, to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, also described as 206 San Mateo Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida MCOUNTY 4 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tam iami Tail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112 -5356, (239) 252 -8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida Na 93.10 February l9 2016 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Minutes & Records, Clerk of Courts FROM: Wanda Rodriguez, ACP /2 fr DATE: March 18, 2016 RE: Hearing Examiner Decision(s) from March 10, 2016. Attached are the signed HEX decisions from the Hearing Examiner hearing on March 10, 2016. Attachments: HEX No. 2016 — 09 HEX No. 2016— 1.0 [05-COA-01253/813 782/11744 HEX NO. 2016—09 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. BDE-PL20150000039 — A. Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Brodman request a 22.8 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42.8 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with a boat lift for the benefit of Lot 6, Bayfront Gardens, also described as 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. DATE OF HEARING: March 10, 2016 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant-and-the-public, and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition is approved. ANALYSIS: Other than a representative of the applicant, there were no members of the public in attendance for this item and there were no objections received by staff. DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition No. BD-PL20150000039, filed by A. Douglas Brodman, for a 22.8-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42.8 feet to accommodate a docking facility with a boat lift on the property described herein, in accordance with the Proposed Site Plan attached as Exhibit"A", and as subject to the condition(s) set forth below. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A—Proposed Site Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 6 of BAYFRONT GARDENS, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 114 through 117, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. [15-CPS-01474/1243279/1]32 1 of 2 CONDITIONS: 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. DISCLAIMER: Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners or the Board of Zoning Appeals, as appropriate. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. � 3 � t(0 -2® (Co ,1" I/ Date Mark Strain, Hearing Examiner Ap roved as t orm and legality: Scott A Stone Assistant County Attorney [15-CPS-01474/1243279/1}32 2 of 2 {N co) ionrm 7. 2 a$ 0 A v v e {1 p It O v . o a O r -Z—t < " O + W 0 in th N q .. a ,� .IN z ey e a 0 14 g gm 3 r' A ig41.8 4 < $n a �ri a wr` oa\ 3 rt m� B� o m 0111 As .Y ig ■- 1t1 k if.. be IN IlltaXtlin e lit '' ..®pr O Y \ ddb x/ a ` . \ ',pie:,• ...0„,./ . { .r-fi" RP 1 W M 51 /1 1\4( Z M 49+ :u t f 0 IXx W Z .s.‘. 4 8 �� M z Fair I- Z s / a D 1-K g a ci 4 0, �� D. =% 6 Z la a W 2 fa n �hqL N 0. z �- rn r X15 M C a O a (0 6 N S8 m� '7o ° aa® aKI:1 4c cc a i Exhibit "A" • • I AGENDA ITEM 4-A Co er County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING ZONING DIVISION HEARING DATE: MARCH 10, 2016 SUBJECT: BDE-PL20150000039, 232 BAREFOOT BEACH BOULEVARD PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: A. Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Brodman 232 Barefoot Beach Boulevard Naples, FL 34134 Agent: David Turley ADK Permitting Solutions, LLC PO Box 111385 Naples, FL 34108 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting a boat dock extension under 5.03.06 H. of the Land Development Code to extend a boat dock 22.8 beyond the allowed 20 feet under Section 5.03.06 E.1. of the LDC for a protrusion of 42.8 feet in Little Hickory Bay. The petitioner would like to construct a 410 square foot boat dock to accommodate a 25 foot vessel with a lift. The waterway width is approximately 223 +/- foot wide. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject site is located at 232 Barefoot Beach Boulevard, and is further described as Lot 6, of the Bayfront Gardens Subdivision. The site is located in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, Folio Number 23095000607. (See location map on the following page) BDE-PL20150000039, Page 1 of 11 EXHIBIT 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd.Dock Extension. HEX Hearing March 10,2016 ��A A 3110ilb HaX l �°2 , �. 1 \\I- Pit*,,t40 C 2 mr..0 irk\ molar ...., no ark 4311� �� Its-® � �--4 I 0 d a 44;44016 bli -0 4,11/A,Vitth 41- (.9 Itetw oi tivisi' tk, wv, 8 1 v, ® tr z 4 14t 1 .-. * , g o 4,1400 'ilii t ii g 0 s,C ►ytlms m w«n.aYwnr IM O • i = =I _ Y� W wF All a „' J ���I � .�3� "�„jam '� on Trued= l” 4"Ill 1 lel 11116 .2 Ill L ir ril .1 ,,iti.,,„cy' -- 10 , a. i li g II 4i_ op I" 3 ' ttt iii_ 11111_111!-Wa-- ____IT, aux:0 1 - ---,-----1 ..m ��- G 'K s 111 oi' ,A.` MI as $1 Z s 2 / ; a ,; W® I Ile b O 7111WW1111 ,1,11 111_11.4. ow 1_ tit It 4112 6 •Wril" CIELOUNALINWIA10.51111 ':�- te --t'/,24'� J E.',' Aj laXKO q)LP gg or 9ii9 BDE-PL20150000039, Page 2 of 11 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. Dock Extension. HEX Hearing March 10,2016 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is proposing to construct a new boat dock and lift that protrudes 42.8 feet from the shoreline for a single 25-foot vessel with a 7,000 pound capacity. The property, with a zoning designation of a PUD (Lely Barefoot Beach), is .23 acres and has 104.1 feet of water frontage. The setbacks from the riparian lines, with an LDC requirement of 15 feet, will be 30.1 feet from the left/north riparian line and 40.8 feet from the right/south riparian line. (See boat dock plan page 5) Neighboring residential homes on the canal have boat docks. No dredging is proposed and there have been no objections from the public as of the date of this staff report. Aerial shoto - Collier Coun GIS Ma. A 1- Existing Docks 1 g it a'* :# 221 0 1 ;. A - s� y x, t ! ►g j ..� r T Rte« Subject Parcel: 232 Barefoot Beach Boulevard Ihe V.48 .sy 1. GGJ 43„e7,-, N Is 0 s , ., f� 2 " \ Existing Docks . � IL y "`" 2'5 , l 0. 240 r of it ' ,1-.1 111 Vic;%II 2�,9 /`"*i BDE-PL20150000039, Page 3 of 11 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. Dock Extension. HEX Hearing March 10,2016 i SURROUNDING LAND USE&ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: Single Family Residence with a zoning designation of Lely Barefoot Beach PUD SURROUNDING: North: Single Family Residences with a zoning designation of Lely Barefoot Beach PUD East: Little Hickory Bay, single-family residences across the bay with a zoning designation of Lely Barefoot Beach PUD South: Single Family Residences with a zoning designation of Lely Barefoot Beach PUD West: Barefoot Beach Boulevard, Single Family Residence with a zoning designation of Lely Barefoot Beach PUD ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Section 5.03.06 J.4 of the LDC requires the petitioner to demonstrate how the proposed location of the dock minimizes impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation. The mangroves along the shoreline, based on the proposed dock,would be impacted. The terminal platform portion of the dock could be extended further into the water so that only the access walkway impacts existing mangroves. This would reduce current and future mangrove impacts while keeping the total structure still within 25% of the width of the waterbody. The petitioner has not elected to further minimize impacts to native vegetation along the shoreline because that would require even a greater boat dock extension request. (See mangrove Trim Plan page 6) A submerged resources survey was conducted on July 3, 2014. No submerged resources were found in or near the project site. BDE-PL20150000039, Page 4 of 11 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd.Dock Extension. HEX Hearing March 10,2016 pp U ¢Je .k:i _ 0 05 J LL - 3 -a S' 3 m n m T 4—Z—mod tl[" ° W A� W t� at l f o o a Z $ II 11 env a 0 E ;a [� 0% 0 c < i Ii ��c t t \ - ,_ ii .A �� a f ,\� a Jv , 0,2 c ` A .j It l 112 :Jul < `V m �J 2 OM 4 Ia 1 ZS . li \ X e GV` pm In Y�Z a Rio [V �1: `:-.4,--S4./ "Nip \ 6 .,,,," (.‘..$, . , '-..,t) ' \ t M O 'F+, L a ad' O 3Q �a !I C E \ rte . d W 'Ig n F fa O 2 61. g 1111 W z t t r6 r-W{ o r a Bra. W� LAJ w 1 ma Dock Concept Plan BDE-PL20150000039, Page 5 of 11 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. Dock Extension. HEX Hearing March 10,2016 141" ? :. II 1._ / 7 1 T co Mao w 3 $ '� a• 0 \c c :Q ti X L Vii iu" 2 ," i= u ,4ER, 4 , P log z �~ c ! , \ - u i 12. i F \\ 'h .1. '0 en \ Y1Av Vlp,-;a o Q i 1d `b a - 1 c. i .oy / + - may "-_ ` 1R \ 2 %, '�' r,J\ Q o W ' z 5, W i r W L,...-.7 i 1;i . tr,a n v N o / 4 ... �w °a r `y `` i d � m La / / Mangrove Trim Plan BDE-PL20150000039, Page 6 of 11 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. Dock Extension. HEX Hearing March 10,2016 STAFF COMMENTS: The Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny, a dock facility extension request based on the following criteria. In order for the HEX to approve this request, it must be determined that at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria have been met. Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06 H of the LDC and finds the following: PRIMARY CRITERIA 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. This is a single-family use and the applicant contends that one slip is being used, as depicted, according to the plan. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion not met. According to the petitioner's application the water depth in this area of Little Hickory Bay is not shallow and does have adequate depth to accommodate the mooring of the proposed vessel within the LDC 20 foot protrusion limit. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, the proposed dock facility will not adversely impact navigation on Little Hickory Bay and other docks in the neighboring area are for the most part comparable in length. BDE-PL20150000039, Page 7 of 11 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd.Dock Extension. HEX Hearing March 10,2016 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met. The information provided in the application indicates that the proposed dock will protrude 42.8 feet into a waterway that is 223 feet in width (shoreline to shoreline). Therefore the dock facility will protrude approximately 5 percent of the waterway width which means that it meets this criterion. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. As shown in the drawings submitted by the petitioner, the proposed dock, boat lift, and vessel will be located approximately 40 feet from the south riparian line and approximately 30 feet from the north riparian line. With a 25-foot vessel (proposed), the inside location of the proposed boat lift and dock will not interfere with neighboring docks or access. The dock closest to this proposal is approximately 60 feet to the south(see aerial map). SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement,shoreline configuration,mangrove growth,or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The shoreline is natural and supports mangroves with a wide fringe allowed to be trimmed under F.S. 4039326 (1) (a). In an effort to preserve the mangroves, a boat dock extension is requested. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. The proposed dock allows for routine maintenance of the vessel and for limited recreation use such as kayak and canoed launching and site temporary storage. BDE-PL20150000039, Page 8 of 11 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd.Dock Extension. HEX Hearing March 10,2016 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion met. The subject property contains a linear waterfront that is approximately 104 feet in length according to the application. The total length of the proposed vessel is 25 feet which is less than 50 percent of the waterfront footage. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The existing mangrove fringe obscures the view of Little Hickory Bay from the first floor of neighboring residences and therefore the proposed dock does not have an impact of their view. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. No seagrass beds were found within the immediate area. Therefore, there will be no impact to seagrass beds. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion not applicable. The proposed total dock facility consists of one boat lift/slip and is therefore not subject to the provisions of this section. Staff analysis indicates that the request meets four of the five primary criteria. With regard to the six secondary criteria, one of the criteria is found to be not applicable, and the request meets five of the remaining five secondary criteria. The applicant's primary reason for a boat dock extension is for existing mangroves present. BDE-PL20150000039, Page 9 of 11 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd.Dock Extension. HEX Hearing March 10,2016 APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, any party may appeal such final action to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Division Administrator within 30 days of the action by the Hearing Examiner. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for BDE-PL20150000039 on February 18,2016. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve Petition BDE-PL20150000039. BDE-PL20150000039, Page 10 of 11 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd.Dock Extension. HEX Hearing March 10,2016 PREPARED BY: DANIEL J. SMITH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: !7' RAYMOND V. BELLOWS,ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION -2-/ 8- ne MICHAEL BOSI, AICP. DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION BDE-PL20150000039, 1 p tt °IC [I 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. Dock Extension. HEX Hearing March 10,2016 Boat Dock Extension Petition BD-PL20150000039 Completed Application Applicant A. Douglas Brodman Location 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. Bayfront Gardens Lot 6 Proposed project is to construct a (410) sq. ft. private single family dock with a single boat slip with a 7,000 lb. capacity boat lift to accommodate a (25) pleasure craft. We are requesting a (22.8) foot extension beyond the maximum allowed of 20 feet for a total protrusion of (42.8) feet from the most restrictive point.The total over water structure is (410) sq.feet.The vessel has a beam of 8' 6" and a hull draft of (1.25)feet with the motor up and (2.5)feet down. Planning Coordinator at the time, was Michael Sawyer Current Principal Planner, Daniel J. Smith, AICP Agent for the Applicant: David Turley ADK Permitting Solutions, LLC $ nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS LDC Section 5.03.06 Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following information is intended to guide the applicant through the application and public hearing process for a Dock Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment Petition. Prior to submitting the Dock Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment Petition application, the applicant shall attend a pre-application meeting to determine if a dock facility extension or boathouse establishment is available and to discuss the location, length/protrusion, and configuration of the proposed boat dock facility. The pre-application fee is $500.00 and will be credited toward application fee upon submittal. If the application is not submitted within 9 months of the pre-application meeting the pre-app fee will be forfeited and will not be credited toward the application fee. In order for the application to be processed, all accompanying materials (see attached submittal checklist) shall be completed and submitted with the application. The application fee for a Dock Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment is $1,500.00, plus $925.00 for required legal advertising. After submission of the completed application packet, accompanied with the required fees, the applicant will receive a response notifying that the petition is being processed. Accompanying that response will be a receipt for the payment and the tracking number (i.e., BDE- PL20120000000) assigned to the petition. This petition tracking number should be noted on all future correspondence regarding the petition. Pursuant to the LDC and the Administrative Code, several public notice requirements shall be completed within the required time frames. The Planning and Zoning Department will provide, at the cost of the applicant, legal notification to surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the subject property and newspaper advertisement (required 15 days prior to the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing date). The applicant will be notified by email of the hearing date and will receive a copy of the Staff Report. It is recommended, but not required, that the applicant or the agent attend the Hearing Examiner hearing. Please contact the Growth Management Division at 252-2400 for further assistance completing this application. 6/3/2014 Page 1 of 7 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colIiergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION LDC Section 5.03.06 3 B.of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR(check one): ❑ DOCK EXTENSION I BOATHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED . -#'r-oR'{xa 5 Rio §•`-. Applicant(s): A. Douglas Brodman Address: 232 Barefoot Bch Blvd City: Bonita Springs State: Florida zip: 34134 Telephone: (239) 910-1660 Cell: n/a Fax: n/a E-Mail Address: adbrodman @gmail.com Name of Agent: David Turley Firm: ADK Permitting Solutions, LLC Address: PO Box 111385 City: Naples State: Florida ZIp: 34108 Telephone: (239) 273-9846 Cell: n/a Fax: n/a E-Mail Address: d.turley07 @gmail.com PROPERTY LOCATION Section/Township/Range: 06 /48 X25 property I.D. Number: 23095000607 Subdivision: Bayfroont Gardens Unit: Lot: 06 Block: Address/General Location of Subject Property: 232 Barefoot Bch Blvd, / Lely Barefoot Beach Development Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: PUD /Single Family Residence BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS.GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 6/3/2014 Page 2 of 7 co_ County COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colIiergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N PUD/BD-03-AR-4392 Single Family Residence S PUD Single Family Residence E Waterway/PUD Little Hickory Bay W Barefoot Bch Blvd/ROW/PUD Single Family Residence DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project(indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement,addition to existing facility,any other pertinent information): Request a 22.8 foot extension beyond the allowable 20 feet to construct a 410 sq.ft. private single family dock to accommodate a 25 foot vessel in a boat slip with a lift.A(4 x 36)foot walk extends perpendicular to the shore with 2- (25)foot finger piers perpendicular to the walkway. SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 223+/- ft. Measurement from n plat jJ survey E visual estimate C other(specify) 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 104.1 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 30.1 R ft. 40.8 L ft. Required: 15 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 42.8 ft. 5. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 25 ft. 2. ft. 3. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: Docks in Bayfront Gardens: Lot 4 is 34', Lot 5 is 44', Lot 7 is 20'+, Lot 15 is 40'; Docks across the bay that extend out from a rip-rap seawall are Lot 18 is 32'and Lot 19 is 29' 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.23 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? n Yes E I No if yes,please provide copies. 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 7 er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE _ GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.coiliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks,additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) 6/3/2014 Page 4 of 7 BDE-PL20150000039 Brodman Boat Dock Extension Primary Criteria and Responses 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate;typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips;typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in case of unbridged barrier island docks,additional slips may be appropriate.) The proposed project is to construct a private single family dock to facilitate the mooring of 25-foot motor vessel with a boat lift in a single slip, which is appropriate in relation to the 104.1 linear feet of water frontage, which is typical for a single family residence and zoned PUD. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MIT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is to shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension) The water depth at this location is not a factor (please refer to the attached drawings) hence this criteria would not be met. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) The dock facility will not adversely impact navigation due to the width of the existing waterway that does not have any marked navigable channels and has ample water depth is > 7-feet at Mean Low Water. • Page 1 of 2 BDE-PL20150000039 Primary Criteria and Responses: (continued) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25%of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50% of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained of navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages). The proposed dock protrudes a total of 42.8-feet (19.2 percent) into a waterway, from the most restrictive point, that is approximately 223 +1- feet in width as provided on the survey. The dock on the opposite shoreline protrudes 31 feet (13.9 percent) therefore, 149.2-feet (66.9 percent) of navigable waterway will be maintained exceeding the minimum (50 percent) required. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) The proposed dock has a side setback of 30.1 feet (left) or 94.5-feet from the adjacent dock to the north and a 40.8 foot (right) setback or a distant of 66.8-feet from the dock to the south. The proposed dock will not interfere with the use of the neighboring docks.(Refer to page 1 of 5, "Boundary Map "for neighboring dock locations) Page 2 of 2 Cot r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement,shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present,compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 I must be demonstrated.) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) 6/3/2014 Page 5 of 7 BDE-PL20150000039 Secondary Criteria and Responses 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth,or seagrass beds.) The shoreline is natural, not hardened, and supports mangroves with a wide fringe allowed to be trimmed under F.S. 403.9326(1)(a). The proposed dock is centrally located and angled out far enough as not to harm or interfere with the mangrove roots.(Please refer to the drawings and overlay exhibit) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) The proposed dock design allows for routine maintenance of the vessel and for limited recreational use, such as kayak/canoe launching and retrieval and on site temporary storage. 3. For single-family dock facilities,whether or not the length of the vessel or vessels in combination,described by the petitioner exceeds 50%of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained. The length of the vessel is 25-feet (24 percent) of the property's 104.1 linear feet of waterfront footage which is less than 50 percent of the property's shoreline. Page 1 of 2 BDE-PL20150000039 Secondary Criteria and Responses (continued) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of the neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) The existing mangrove fringe obscures the view of Little Hickory Bay from the first floor of the neighboring residences and would not have an impact of their view. (Please refer to attached photographs) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 I of this code must be demonstrated.) No seagrass beds were noted within the immediate area. (Please refer to the Submerged Resource Survey provided by Turrell, Hall and Associates) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with the subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) This is a single family dock facility with one boat slip and is not subject to the requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan as stated in the above referenced code. Page 2 of 2 9itY COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: of Dock Extension II Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal,the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW #OF REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 6 n Signed and Sealed Survey ® P..� Chart of Site Waterway ® FA-4 n Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank,seawall,or rip-rap revetment); • Configuration,location,and dimensions of existing and proposed 6 facility; — " • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property;and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization,signed and notarized 1 154.1 C Completed Addressing Checklist 1 C Electronic copy of all required documents *Please advise:The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials Z X LI to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/3/2014 Page 6 of 7 CO er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.cotliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 PLANNERS—INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: 14 Environmental Review:See Pre-Application Executive Director Meeting Sign-In Sheet Addressing:Annis Moxam Graphics:Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples:Robin Singer,Planning Director ( Historical Review ❑ Comprehensive Planning:See Pre-Application Meeting Sign In Sheet ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL:Nichole Ryan ❑ Parks and Recreation:Vicky Ahmad County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko ❑ Transportation Pathways:Stacey Revay ❑ Emergency Management:Dan Summers;and/or ❑ School District(Residential Components):Amy EMS:Artie Bay Heartlock ❑ Engineering:Alison Bradford ❑ Transportation Planning:John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering:Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS: X� Boat Dock Extension Petition:$1,500.00 t"< Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package.I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may e . ' the delay of processing this petition. ,4 i fS - Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date 6/3/2014 Page 7 of 7 o Cr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.collierRov.net (239)252-2400 Pre-Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Date and Time: I •2-1 • 1 ® t.4)'6: ' Assigned Planner: - -- Engineering Manager(for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: akt i b4 PL#: Property ID#:2•�c=i1 5-1"Current Zoning: Project Address: 7i2_ 1T ICity: -:'..-.=- State: C—. Zip: Applicant: A. 26..ki..A->ES Agent Name: DUB Phone: Agent/Firm Address: City: State: Zip: Property Owner: Please provide the following,if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed#of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments,indicate the original petition number: v. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: 99ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 IMeeting Notes {� • /' / - !� // ALL ft_ • ,, p/ , 1 r.o - Co r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Dock Extension ■ Boathouse Chapter 3 B.of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal,the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Application(download current form from County website) 6 154 ❑ Signed and Sealed Survey ® ►� ❑ Chart of Site Waterway ® �i ❑ Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank,seawall,or rip-rap revetment); • Configuration, location,and dimensions of existing and proposed 6 ❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property;and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization,signed and notarized 1 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 15f. ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please advise:The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials /1"2- ❑ to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/3/2014 Page 6 of 7 . Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 PLANNERS—INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: u Environmental Review:See Pre-Application Executive Director Meeting Sign-In Sheet Cgc Addressing:Annis Moxam Graphics:Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples:Robin Singer,Planning Director Historical Review ❑ Comprehensive Planning:See Pre Application El Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Meeting Sign-In Sheet ❑ Conservancy of SWFL:Nichole Ryan ❑ Parks and Recreation:Vicky Ahmad Il, County Attorney's Office:Heidi Ashton-Cicko ❑ Transportation Pathways:Stacey Revay ❑ Emergency Management:Dan Summers;and/or ❑ School District(Residential Components):Amy EMS:Artie Bay Heartlock ❑ Engineering:Alison Bradford ❑ Transportation Planning:John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering:Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS: Boat Dock Extension Petition:$1,500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 Ilk An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date 6/3/2014 Page 7 of 7 Pre-Application Meeting Sign-In Sheet PL#: , . Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony @colliergov.net VSummer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque @colliergov.net ❑ Alison Bradford,P.E. Engineering Services 252-6820 alisonbradford @colliergov.net ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin @colliergov.net ❑ George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio @colliergov.net ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst.County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton @colliergov.net ❑ Kay Deselem,AICP Zoning Services 252-2931 kaydeselem @colliergov.net ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman @colliergov.net ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons @colliergov.net ❑ Nancy Gundlach,AICP,PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach @colliergov.net ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth @colliergov.net ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall @colliergov.net ❑ Reed Jarvi,P.E. Transportation Planning 252-5849 reedjarvi @colliergov.net ❑ Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger @colliergov.net ❑ Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins @colliergov.net ❑ Jack McKenna,P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna @colliergov.net ❑ Matt McLean,P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean @colliergov.net ❑ Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz @colliergov.net ❑ Michele Mosca,AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2466 michelemosca @colliergov.net ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam @colliergov.net ❑ Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree @ colliergov.net ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero @colliergov.net ❑ John Podczerwinsky Transportation Planning 252-5890 johnpodczerwinsky @colliergov.net ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard @colliergov.net ❑ Fred Reischl,AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl @colliergov.net ❑ Stacy Revay Transportation Pathways 252-5677 stacyrevay @colliergov.net ❑ Brett Rosenblum,P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum @colliergov.net Michael Sawyer Zoning Services 252-2926 michaelsawyer @colliergov.net ❑ Corby Schmidt,AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt @colliergov.net ❑ Chris Scott Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net ❑ Daniel Smith,AICP Landscape Review 252-4312 danielsmith @colliergov.net XScott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone @colliergov.net Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain @colliergov.net Carolina Valera Comprehensive Planning 252-8498 carolinavalera @colliergov.net ❑ Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen @colliergov.net ❑ Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathonwalsh @colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks,AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks @colliergov.net ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Planning and Zoning 252-5518 kirstenwilkie @colliergov.net Co [ er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION! NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre- application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL(Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP(Site Development Plan) Q BD(Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ Camival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU(Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP(Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI(Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat ❑ SNR(Street Name Change) ❑ LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC(Street Name Change—Unplatted) ❑ PNC(Project Name Change) ❑ TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) El PPL(Plans&Plat Review) ❑ VA(Variance) ❑ PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ(Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description may be attached) Bayfront Gardens Lot 6 Section 06, Township 48 S, Range 25 E FOLIO(Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 23095000607 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(as applicable, if already assigned) 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME(if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER(for existing projects/sites only) SDP or AR or PL# • Coffer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET Project or development names proposed for,or already appearing in,condominium documents(if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Check One: ❑ Checklist is to be Faxed back ® Personally Picked Up APPUCANT NAME: A. Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Brodman PHONE (239) 910-1660 FAX email: adbrodman @gmail.Com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY /� QQ ` FLN Number(Primary) 230 151 O‘O 7 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number • Approved by: tom,L. _ . Date: / 22-141 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED t :1:4.144*47.1'. :_'' 1:15<ftij .■ in _ • _:. , . 0 - . 2 S _ ..,........ - — .,, . si ., Et 113,A -. . - . --,-- , . .: .., .. -.: - - . d. , 0 z• 4,. ..E : ' • 'I• ' ,.' >" .,- . S, . , F.. ........, Z ,,,,i--.5 • i 8 ' '' '' _ _ ..... ,,,,,--,.-t-.. ,,,,,,..: .., _,- . .„ . 0 .. .... . 5 0 , ; • ,,-. - . - * — ,% --0".'"'"'•. ' ' .,,,,,, •.. '4-#.1F T'L-7,. ' :,,,, U f, 1 0 - .- , • ' ,-,---N: ,...4--;- Si ,LL- s'f, ' 'ilii,, , ''-' 0,04,.:L.,f.;..-774 ' '..„-. ''-. . —',--•- 0 • L, . • , 4.' ,,,,,r.,,,,: -7,4t,,,1:4..i,•:.t. - ,_,,.---' r- 0 O. 0 CC 0 Z >a. W ,:i C°0 ct o D Lli 1.11 0,0 2 :. .0. t. c (1) e 44 a cr z < Z las wvvt.t54. >. 147i-41 2 "XI g3q. D 0 2. I= 0° Z 0 - —.`1-- u_ o - 1 )- W fl 1-= 1-- 1---cr) 0 ' t" Z M 0 .w. w 0 Lill --1 (r < a. 00"7/9 Lu 0 . ;.. °- x ;71 G cc o to c•I , 0 1- > 1 _i , co_, o u- ci tri LL a CN CN 0 , LU LU TM o =u- -.1 . 0 < ui fil LL w 0 ca Z t- U..) Cs4 CO QZ —2 Z 1 ••0 0- 03 li. cn 0 tn LA u. < 64 uj 1..... g x 2 §8 g Z 0 11:1 di (2) W 0= 0 , , — a< Z p CZ co 0 IX --,I-- W< ...)-- ..co i--- 0 ,•••' = '''' ....' ILI 4 - 9 0 I.■ A E- A A A = , , itplianw t. ' co Q ..7 i-71 ..—,.— L. '—' (...) n .,,.. i..ti < i MP c) = li - Q., „ Tr,. '''' E 2 7 /0 I u Lii Fr• .' A: . „...... ... .2 ad 1 ,.... ril 0 il ° •NINI 11111111111 .1- k , •• , ,„?.....:-,,,,,,.. 5 =0.1; 6 > ZZ: < ;1 . 2 i Ailf, Oliiismat- zwiltiom• 0 Iti.1 4-- . 0 „I,co 2 Sf2 I 6 1 . •-;ka.1:?../ o- f t'---I ' r I. Z --g L or. , D,:t . a 01432-brodnun ars\CANSRS11432-SRS.dwg LOCATION 7f1812014 A ^ l • • I0 - a � =$e ie d _' � _ n °yv v v 5 a n C z U * Cw LIJ a 0 Qs "..ii,* 8 ..! ` W <�Q w u.) t' 111 ° 0,s MI U 1 U 2 Z Cfl A 9r b o m u 6' 4 W CnD Qt+7�+< v a a wa n 1°41 R 0 It � ~ a h ; Q Z 151:.:°a CD K \ ��� i i '� TTTT;u y1 i Cr W 0 FFFFg� g°' (I ! mei- = za f ` ��© "3°- y o 14" m z MIS S -I r �u��3 _r a o •o- tI 1111111111111•1111111111 -� o tn d �Liii o Ca z 0 0 0 oz us X15:4?.3g W 13 mo. (4\ \ m W Z ^ a 0 15.).- La r1 U C r^ tn ¢a ttv eC W o ce W asp- C ' to p: O .a/ C' T... O v 0_ ate' 0 0 it' jo 0 0 vi ®L"0 •4 0g 0 I. 0 z o)- •a�, qo < Cl- 0 og8 •6.. my 5 mw Lo 4r GI 3 2 6kk/ m a / .■ 0 o a :`- w a ctik- / d'. O fvoo7h u� 4 t 61ol�g `r �am .41r U0 aW CO rat + - ^� • f i G1 t IC? Cri•S'2 .1��ry�9 8 a c 1�0 �� QQQ o ` vii v+ <1'' �� tot S� o w -. R e '0 .. FA0 °'o pp ' �- i s ^( .. 1, • ' �.� Ca E • _ mare; v ; No a = v rn a a f ` 0. to e e irl tri a 0 ec 3 ti, m o 1 ili §i" -11 z filin IX car $ W G 41 41 laJ iret z tn G ,a � .. 1 ._i P W Q m F '+m�paw 0.0 U- — 0 Gi .pg f sJill, W z W f m a Z.-00 q aSZSca AS 0 i1" coalo gi ., ri----, "g aid■i l? 14.1 "� . ' n b IMMO 11111111111111111•11 1 O 0 Z tw z§ `i�moii Q(i U C.) to tai *�' m Z 0 t o ,.a ys 0 ∎∎ 6_< OoL� Z g i. W as aFm� o ¢ �$ a Wo_CO 9 e.. fh J z aW �� a r° ` , < p Q C ° � N m cc m IL 0�o Q OW J zi m < Q a 0. n to a O W - sV < Q Q )_, Z^ WQ2 1 Q = u M 2 U i j I MIQ U W < L C w 11 QCal thri Ow I- v a 'co �. �,;' z�Qzaa a La M,- x cc ca N OS `' tn� icn� Q frZm a3 Q Oh QwW< w w W II Wtt,iZ j to N z�Zaa U Q R6� Q 0 UW Wn=a �w3-U Z 2 �NZ Z ^:. o� Q��"� �'' t-- ? z [a� ag gym N a 2 t J'' to pOWU Ei m U 3 .. Bm Zm"M < W U W 1� C 2 ti W N 0 t(i UION sW1f�[Yj IN 4f W O O C Z .O U O W tx tn� °a0� 4.x0wa Val S5 < 2 2 5 Oi �c0i z0, Q a z o aaz a QZU a z a° W m a 11 a -`'w z m U Ucoj U <zz U< Q b d li a MS Z�� F pp Cl a ago Uwf?ii�-IIU°Q tUW a twit (z• C• .$.• CU 40N CC 0 ., a n% 'X 0 tangy 4 p a s tY 6'f wow W zO ``cis. p to VS - ' to 2 vf c7 O 2 .f x2 C9 N. 1M d t8 h m m as m*co 0 CO �\ O 0 c'sp m . p -0-4‘N o o -0 02 3 m , m .-i ® L O.- > , `.t 'MU r1 -N i 1( . ( Z ( ( T ..4 W W O m ip PL W `� N ° 0 w x c �w A r. w� v° m v td o ..aG o � a �\ o p 4 ]xa o = 3��, z 977 0 1- Li_ 0 V ad CLI p 0 gg�E It i,< 0 L.,-- --; .. z 03 co d\ , ct p it7 �I-\ w C v Q x op fctigailrgl yj K. O 11 \ ..XXXXXam y tit-,va, N a - p mow■MMMMM g O . L .:1:-. J,o..u.°a i O Y O a 0 00 x'62-') a 4o. ' NM �‘o X O'e` \ 6 S' / O y / / A's °�� rl f .-'P*LL.cK 'o. '8b Om \ 1m , x X,.s. g J o `B°e > r7 z + ,uos ' Rm z rL azz-x jv �� Q O ii/ a Mm m z mg W _W-41 -0 ,`. Z� l-W J ��\ `dim -1P� O_ gQ U, Z Th- Zx mg �m Nz 7 (yf m 1--- J J N� j� nu Q Z Z OO Ct Q X �g O / 30 _11—Q U W W d_ \ =v zz o0 w d Z_ W o W Z co m to mm et $ o R mo LA � aN W W !p Z v n.- 9 > c4' J Z *SJ j ti. 0 o_ :j".w2 0J >- 7 c ct ��In <f- -:t Q w C� OQW •o M p 1..._a oa-, am L.L. wQp wW co�J z O a 0 to w 5 w p m w a: / cn m \ -O �4 In co N = coYqg m Rio o_ o ..-+ ciii E mRaca3=moo I . —1 II \f dig W m 8 r. U w c.4 g` u c v •- O ro 0o Z 1■ 0 i L BP Q w ; Maw:zq w ra x A _ .in VI 13:1 ttilik& 2 I- Y pq pq a l �/ p J t=-q �\ A o F�Er3 ''''$ / '-� Om / A WF°'FU 43 0 mnzg q °w �° s �soa a A u3 \ \? X Y d- >, \ ai� Z /\�� `� W>�OS m .)\_________________ 76"j ,9 p o/o , -V- ,6- ,$) ,44,/ / v\p F,1 a I er 1 _ r oz 0 , W\ 9 F CC J q 0 q CO Z es is W q W srf� CJ H M I- Z L H Z \ O 0 ° J Q U W 0 W rt O< > > a E �° r °pw o p 0 w wZ cc W (7 ! w O r 1-p1.— O Z N W W N > J Z d- J d l- 0 >- 0d' J W Y �� H ix nXN q�0 O a 0 . �Z Cuj 4W i m a 0X ' pg Z �qo IA_°o cc M to 0 WfYp w o }¢m xi--< �q w 0°a - teL L.0 1 , —4 cNI -,,, ii —, -- --- v— 1Z (=3 .... , MP , al9 2 a • U4 {•■••• •••••-• w CI as 4., 0 11.9f- Ci cn N = - -. - .1z.- ,' 6 a ;,:.. - !I -- < z \ --. =.4 0- . _ ... —. :< w w _ w .... -.cR .4, •1 A. re •••t- =0 al L.. ,. 1.. = \ , L7...t al 1). —'4 -='" --.. 44:- ,e.... c4.0.,7,...t, t g: 0 0 - Z 0 0 'e. T X Ce CC ' *-- a , , -_-- C.9 w Z 4. M il.i 0 LJ, ... ,-- Lai 0 tl I < .1 z,- LI at I - cc • 0. \ '-- ---, c 1-- .A'. ... . ma 2 1•--; :4 omens -.„ -- .t.' ,-',',,",',4 ,?-- cn '44*' \ asassassa *muumuus..- SAMINNIIIIIIII a-a,- ... ill111111111111111111 t 4 2 \ 0 . Y -,•"" r', (,-..?, -;;•• t' 2` .4 ii `.., 0 .. '-±.- ,_ al --- ->, Iii In a ‘ •Oir, \ __......00 ..- - - j'-===4,416-' . ,:•;,...'. --=,,e,-->ir-plirck- t-'. -- ...--.... (3 • 4-..-r, -..,.,40,--,-IL-,-,-4,,,- 1"-• ,....4 „,,,...r, 'Vb.:. ,„v„-r-, , -0- l..e. .' - . , ----t- 0.- 1 r \ .124' '%-,.t.-Mr'-'-• '1,1-'' ''. sit, ' '1/4/,* I --;4--*;.- - r- - / '::\., :',..A-Orf.4.4%••••4 "..,.. „ • ,....,. , .-:-,:.•41:',"46.6,1-, , - , i '\ - N-1,o,f•A,443„,,Jr,."--.0=. \ .i•-• ' _ ,, - „,.. _ z - _ .., 72 , - _ :,---", — --, '- - , - i _ - 7._ ! _; E" Z c] i r —1 Ui a t w � to a > o Q 2 .- t ?- ct0 z � � > Q Q z J © tom ,a.} co / ° _ ° • `r11 ii: ' I-1 i I 'iv i I `r 1 0000 g iii `61 Z Z -21 t—1 " z i q , w � t a 4 1 F i_w = cn ce a. cc U~f1 O T Oa -1 I tr o t t I t 1- I 4 f°° � \ ' i ii_LT `o � Q Z . f.o c� 2 0 W 0 f! I - t 1 ; i---1 z 1- O m cp LL O 6i.! i 1 � i — �� O N 0 Et W iD Itt fiF : i t11_, W ,, i2 m p ~O OI t 1 ? 1— U} ! 0 N 42 - � v ! i I O m I I 1 ' 0 EN """ o C 2 _I.11.-11.:__,,,,_.' i CO CL C:Ci i 11 il [t ■ CL `r- - y- ; s ll # 17----1 f t i t i - ' . - �, _ -- . f I t .j,, T I ' 1 9 j s ^ C c F G 1 t „g R i I -¢ t j t i = , ,5 _ ,,, - A , t , cc3 w I— Q � 1 i {� F �'- n(o [ I ---1 € . 11 1 tit L. / `'/ ,t- I l i s_i f t i) I t t t # t ' ! 1 P 1432&edm.n SRSCAfkSRS1432 SRS d w SECTON 7P31 O14 1 CL I it 1 I 1 14 rtr, i W at 0, ...-... 6 1..„. s%•°- .r. 76,-- I I l r1). Lil 3 ' el +77. >.. .....4. .. E , 0 0 ..r.-., 3.- „..,* I.. 01 ...... a. -0 >, ''-'• It _i .4-1 2 C," CU Z tfl 't, r: 0 .. tj 4/74 -0 .1.4 1 4-i 417 .-- ill 4 a.) a a.) ct 0 -5 a; . •?-. 1--: 141 ° 25" al 0. ....0 tri■ i ....... u) .; r.—........ fLi {U x til In 4,11,) 0 0 VI / U•) 8 0 1 L_ t- .._0 „,„ ,- . 4-+ P -- 1 o '- a c: iii U) U) vi 4 '. 7 5. cr. v3 41j0 = 0 — Cr; Zo 0 ' ) E C”) --) l - u '` ti 170. a c *r-4 its cy - _ U) , - ,..-- 0 u a -a a5 , ir, .0 — 111 x c0 4.. ".. 0 I 0 ....0 - I X 6,...... ...,., i U i ';' 4.6 -66 CO 4,-6 ° in 0 cij 1 • ww t en se• =1)1 e E 1 ..-0 . I to 0 0, if) .-..x `*".6 a.1 r'' 0 i 41.? VI f 6 6 E R Iv ra (V I F– ..,._.-- u_ "i - ,....._ ...., . a) fu a) cr. _ri o ill U 0 1 C 1 .• , .... i ■ I 1— : . 77 .., ,.., .., =, .!---------1 , i .., , ::. I 1 .i , 1 . , ....— f -, . 1 1 I I t / , 1 4 >.‘ : t 0 th i I ‘. . 1... , .1 1 4 E 04 C C 0 r,70 1 = t,... 1 t # • I • r- •-,.,•,„, CA 1 1 I ...e 1 .,..1) . 4 a j "-'"•• c) at. Tr : . 0 tr) i t 1 . -›■ , k . / i . , x . I . * ,..........,.,,...4 .4.,.-......x 7 V \ i 147 E i i : J ■ ' ■■■■■ ¢• ' '1.41''l I i .., - Q...;., ; -- ; 1 I r [ , ...,.... 4. f:„.....,..-. ...........--- --.... BRODMAN DOCK 232 BAREFOOT BEACH BLVD NAPLES, FL 34134 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 7,2014 PREPARED BY: TURRELL,HALL&ASSOCIATES,INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE,STE B NAPLES,FL 34104 s o- '°` i 6 L i t471. --'''''s—/ 4101°, "4 c, tel .i/... o I 1111111 ' 2, g P iiiiii 1 ti p Wo fs 4 e.2 ig!J a II !i ! li ilti 0 >- w 0 x> U) w Z 6 n .„..- ,.-..-°"' < ° . 7. .0.. ,'" w, ,i „,.,. , .... -�11� i --P No... **4--I-/ / ,,..„: , , / M /(( e '�. . 401, ,-...:40ite. N A i iIb rie.) K,,--,--; � � -" �`� 4 I BRODMAN RESIDENCE SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 7,2014 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Brodman residence and associated proposed docking facility is located at 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd, identified by Parcel Number 23095000607. The property is located off Barefoot Beach Blvd just south of Bonita Beach Road, bound to the west by Barefoot Beach Blvd,bound to the east by a Little Hickory Bay, and bound to the south and north by a single-family residence. The property is located in Section 06, Township 48 South, and Range 25 East. The upland portion of the property is a single-family residence. Terrell, Hall & Associates was contracted to provide environmental permitting services and one aspect is the associated Submerged Resource Survey (SRS). This survey will provide planning and review assistance to both owners and agency reviewers in regards to proposed project. The proposed project consists of constructing a single-family dock within Little Hickory Bay. The SRS survey was conducted on July 3, 2014. Light southeast winds and mostly clear skies resulted in visible access to the entire project area. Surface water conditions on this day were calm which also helped to provide fair environmental conditions for the survey. The water temperature was 83°F. High tide occurred at 6:09 A.M (1.9') and low tide occurred at 12:07 P.M (0.9')on the date of the survey. 2.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of the submerged resource survey was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within the limits of the proposed project. The survey provided onsite environmental information to help determine if the proposed project would impact any existing submerged resources and if so would assist in reconfiguring the proposed dock in order to minimize any impacts. The general scope of work performed at the site is summarized below. • Turrell, Hall &Associates personnel conducted a site visit and I snorkeled these transects within the proposed project basin and verified the location of any submerged resources. • Turrell, Hall &Associates personnel identified submerged resources at the site, estimated the % of coverage, and delineated the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed. • Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel delineated limits via a handheld GPS (Gamin Model 76csx). Page 1 of 3 BRODMAN RESIDENCE SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 7,2014 3.0 METHODOLOGY Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock installation. The components for this survey included: Review of aerial photography of survey area • Establish survey transects lines overlaid onto aerials • Physically swim transects, GPS locate limits of submerged resources, and determine approximate percent of coverage • Document and photograph all findings The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transects spaced approximately 10-feet apart as shown on the attached exhibit. The neighboring properties have existing docks which provided easily identifiable reference markers,such as dock piles which assisted in locating transects and keeping them consistent throughout most of the survey area. One biologist walked/swam these transects using snorkel equipment where needed within the surveyed area. The other individual assisted with compiling notes and documenting findings on aerials. Located submerged resources were photographed, the approximate percent of coverage was quantified, and the location was delineated on an aerial photo as well as confirmed via handheld GPS (Garmin Model 7211). The biologists used a half meter square quadrant further broken into sections by cordage to make coverage estimates easier. 4.0 RESULTS The substrate found within the surveyed area included two distinct classifications; silt sand with shell debris and just silt/muck material scattered throughout. These substrates were found scattered throughout the surveyed area. There was also scattered shell debris mostly observed along the property shoreline which consisted of red mangroves and scattered rip-rap both of which provide habitat for numerous fish, crabs, and barnacles, growing on and around the mangrove roots. The majority of the survey area exhibited a silt/muck bottom that was devoid of any aquatic vegetation growth or any types of submerged resources. The lack of any submerged resources is most likely due to the overall water quality within Little Hickory Bay as well as the water clarity not allowing much sunlight penetration. This was most evident in the deeper water depths. Page 2 of 3 BRODMAN RESIDENCE SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JULY 7,2014 Various filamentous algae and macro algae were observed and documented growing along the bottom sediments throughout the survey area. Also observed were numerous fish species during the survey and a list of these species has been prepared and is provided below as Table 1. Table l —Observed Fish Species Common Name Scientific Name mangrove snapper Lutjanus griseus sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus striped mullet Mugil cephalus 1 snook Centrompus undecimalis jack crevallc Caranx hippos 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The submerged resource survey at the site yielded few findings. Barnacles were observed growing on the mangrove roots and existing dock piles. The subject property shoreline consists of mangroves which provide natural cover. This mangrove area was where all the observed fish species were located including: Gray Snapper (Lutjanus griseus), Shcepshead (Archosargus probatoeephalus), Stripped Mullet (Mugil cephalus), and a few Common Snooks(Centropomus undecimalis). Negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected with the proposed docking facility installation. Page 3 of 3 , s"fax � � x 1 , Subject Property Mangrove Shoreline w# F - k.,s 5 x " -�' r Fty. ♦ ("�� `i. k Y n w • Observed bottom sediment with oyster and shell debris ''''' 1 t- , .,s, ,° II• 4 p. t'. � N a y Typical shell and oyster debris within sediment ''''''. 146'4;itkr -0 .A, '4,'---'' ''' '' '''''''•:- v Oyster shell/debris _. AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) 'ilstt■L.. I`J©' 0 3 I I, g 1.-)1/bLe33 3jZape724,ni (print name),as (title, if applicable)of ,(company, if. ,.licabte),swear orr affirm under oath,that I am the(choose one)owner[applicant[contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches,data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3_ I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize David Turley. ADK Permitting Solutions LLC to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including t through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp.pros.or v.pins. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company(L.L.C_)or Limited Company(L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's'Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, than typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the 'general partner'of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words'as trustee`, • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership, Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fac. .:tat: in It are true. ,Q 1 l -.24v .- -t C>c.7p3OZ �oJ' Signature Date J STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The fooin instrument was sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me on �` (date)by b- l ,4. L)a )ai areal 4 t'.- (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as ho is personail� know o me or who has produced (type of identification)as identification. STAMP/SEAL Signe - of otary Public , ;?i':'ly£f. SHAWN BURNS •a Commission#EE 874982 g Expires April 5,2017 `' ;;Ini;.,r !knifed Tlruriv,rxin Insracs 860-385.1011 4IVN- 'CAA-49115lI35 REV 3/24/14 ciiir County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre- application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) El BL(Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP(Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA(SDP Amendment) El Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP(Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) El FP(Final Plat ❑ SNR(Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) El SNC (Street Name Change-Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL(Plans&Plat Review) El VA(Variance) �-. ❑ PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) El PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) El RZ(Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Bayfront Gardens Lot 6 Section 06, Township 48 S, Range 25 E FOLIO(Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 23095000607 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL# Catiier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents(if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Check One: 0 Checklist is to be Faxed back )] Personally Picked Up APPLICANT NAME: A. Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Brodman PHONE (239) 910-1660 FAx email: adbrodman @gmail.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY /� �t FLN Number(Primary) 2 3O 9.500 44 0 7 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: / " 2"j' T--.2 Updated by: ALL/. /.i/i !_ .[1« .� Date: I-(4( iF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, F R M M UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED x e ,n O N N 00 00 to t. aN 11 Z O c nt p,,,.....1 ti O w 0 t0 N C c�O M N c0 Q- xai Q Q d= R Y a J pA Z J C v.G E.a � �w p s z g ' Q =` ,� " g ' + } a o� m : a 7� wcn �r � z c oc rn ra,,, :::-.,...,....-.71,.-,,i-z,.4.:,774., :,„3"*ka:.. a lir H a am a co= L W e a vo t U vp a " ,,,,=.- 0.,,i „ ,,„,.- � II ,., - E a) II ,„ fM .2 o az O aL co o cd °" " ' czt o al v g � - Q_ cci Q,o." - .�' - i, ,�5 � 'ff r:i..'".0": -":-,:ilf!,-'4'--* *' '''':i1; ' '-:'"."'''.ri:-*,,,.:.- ..i,,, W.;',',-cit a co r A+�a�;4 COLLIER COUNTY Growth Management Department October 08, 2015 A DOUGLAS BRODMAN AND TERESA A BRODMAN REV TRUST 232 BAREFOOT BEACH BLVD BONITA SPRINGS,FL 34135 David Turley,ADK Permitting Solutions,LLC PO Box 111385 Naples, FL 34108 EMAIL—d.turley07 @gmail.com RE: Dock Extension PL20150000039 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd Dear Applicant: The following comments are provided to you regarding the above referenced project. If you have questions,please contact the appropriate staff member who conducted the review. The project will retain a"HOLD" status until all comments are satisfied. The following comments need to be addressed as noted: Rejected Review: Zoning Review Reviewed By: Daniel Smith Email: danielsmith @colliergov.net Phone#: (239)252-4312 Correction Comment 1: Miscellaneous Corrections: Measurement of dock protrusion and extension is from bulkhead line, shoreline, seawall,rip-rap line, control elevation contour,or mean high water table line. Please show clearly this measurement.Not clearly shown. Correction Comment 2: Miscellaneous Corrections: Measurement of distance should be 90 degrees from edge of property line.Please make corrections or clearly show this the case. Correction Comment 3: Miscellaneous Corrections: Please define the control line on the survey. Staff is not sure what the control line represents on the survey and the plat. Correction Comment 4: Miscellaneous Corrections: Please add a note as to the boat having either and inboard or outboard motor. Rejected Review: County Attorney Review Reviewed By: Scott Stone Email: scottstone @colliergov.net Phone#: (239)252-5740 Correction Comment 1: Miscellaneous Corrections: Provide an Affidavit of Authorization(or letter of consent)from Teresa A.Brodman as well, since she is also listed on the deed. Correction Comment 2: Miscellaneous Corrections: The"top of the bank"is not one of the appropriate measurement lines under Section 5.03.06 C.1. Please indicate the measurement of the boat dock protrusion as made from the most restrictive of the following: property line, bulkhead line, shoreline, seawall,rip-rap line, control elevation contour, or mean high water line.Revise your application materials,and update the Site Plan to label the correct measurement line and distance. (According to your survey, it appears that the most restrictive line may be the property line) Correction Comment 3: Miscellaneous Corrections: See attached notes. Rejected Review: Environmental Review Reviewed By: David Anthony Email: davidanthony @colliergov.net Phone#: (239)252-2497 Correction Comment 1: Per Section 5.03.06 J.4 of the LDC,please demonstrate how the proposed location of the dock minimizes impacts to the mangroves when the terminal platform portion of the dock could be extended further into the water so that only the access walkway impacts mangroves while the total structure remains within 25%of the width of the water body. Correction Comment 2: On the proposed site plan, add the following note: "Mangrove trimming is per Section 3.05.02 E of the LDC and Section 403.9326(1)(a)F.S." The following comments are informational and/or may include stipulations: When addressing review comments,please provide a cover letter,outlining your response to each comment. Include a response to completed reviews with stipulations. If you have any questions,please contact me at(239)252-4312. Sincerely, Daniel James Smith,AICP Principal Planner,Zoning Division Growth Management Department cc.adbrodman@gmail.com davidanthony @colliergov.net scottstone @colliergov.net PL20150000039-BDE 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. Review Comments and Responses Rejected Review: Zoning Review Reviewed By: Daniel Smith Correction Comment 1: Measurement of dock protrusion and extension is from bulkhead line, shoreline, seawall, rip-rap line, control elevation contour,or mean high water line. Please show clearly this measurement. Response 1: Changed Top of Bank to read Shoreline on drawings (Please see attached drawings) Correction Comment 2: Measurement of distance should be 90 degrees from edge property line. Response 2: Distance is shown as 90 degrees from edge of dock to the most restrictive point, shoreline. (Please refer to attached drawings) Correction Comment 3: Please define control line on the survey. Response 3: The control line is a reference line in which extends from control point/hub to hub that survey and plats can be calculated from to determine land boundaries, in this case, plated MHWL as described on the original legal description of the development. Page 1 of 3 PL20150000039-BDE Review Comments and Responses (continued) Rejected Review: Environmental Review Reviewed By: David Anthony Correction Comment 1: Per Section 5.03.061.4 of the LDC, please demonstrate how the proposed location of the dock minimizes impacts to the mangroves when the terminal platform portion of the dock could be extended further into the water so that only the access walkway impacts mangroves while the total structure remains within 25%of the width of the water body. Response 1: The purpose of this code is to protect seagrass beds and native shoreline vegetation.The portion of the mangroves to be trimmed are the outer most fringe branches that are approximately 14 feet from the shoreline and the root system extends no more than 7 feet from the shoreline as depicted on the (attached photo exhibits)therefore there would low impact to the main tree itself and possibly encourage fuller growth towards the shoreline as demonstrated in the Mangrove Trimming and Preservation Act of 1996. Correction Comment 2: On the proposed site plan,add the following note: "Mangrove trimming is per Section 3.05.02 E or the LDC and Section 403.9326(1) (a) F.S." Response 2: Please refer to attached drawings for additional notes. Page 3 of 3 1 tC ■ p eV Cy�yq<ini O'w� ct ., f, x 5.-E .„, i E cl. ** v~ ;0 L J tt a. .0 .. 5 a. L t It 1�, ,�-._ _�--Z ( ( V. 1 a 11! °w o Q Z A o $ X u g c4- l I I! JI4! 4\'S.\\' M \ F /V14 2 2 4 if 1 ....41.7 o u in ).- a —....,e- 1,\\//2 ei.'"z1 ill . . ....\ . cc m • et.a .x....,..„0 as • Iiy I Vx \ <'" 21 x 1 M �� O z :, �x 0 g re / \ 42/ a z a t F W x 0 o Z gI .g ng M I-Z tat � x f o O _Q W O Q ( j w p O Q .4- y O d. 1:: G C n. a. u Wa Ø g ul Z O n W pt N W i<flP .r• 2 j �S= �+LL O W,d. J w 0Y O n Rc,m Q w ca VS —Q W •�--0 0 Ha aC� 0m -� o aa. LCD Ler'a ig w W�p W Q tr�a rr< d r D IC b v - re, -N O A a0 -.1 Q :# tg=4 - 0.6 ----�f-Z < ( w o M EQ N W p q `y° °? UU M w A Z be u rn /O � = o i M c ~:7'11% c) c O O ¢ U] 1114 g4 CO N = Z.- ::CE". Z kii0.11 // CO ; it ll �S\4` J 0 m \ 8 ill Y a w �.J1 u to V f � 9 o z A o~ w I s ae4 a ' o " CC 10(s) X 0 ," a) z j \ % n- Vf N kt p Q Z L jj N�1i��n ��d0 N tu Ce 0 a n=iaiiii i t 1 Lu o pQ Om \` o4 oo 0 co 'Yblj a° A0 j -*ddo tt, 41,/ fir` .. ry� ` \ '�,-4v.., \ \ •.A. -4600 4 \ o 'O9 ,QS` 0 : (4,-.? Q.<N9AN(." re) o z La a U Z O f-W z ce R cn z La r-Q z o ,r z �- ¢ ` ` ' O ! 30 �C. Y p a EE \ 7r--- y t--,.. a. Q. CJ WQ cc Y\ W M ^ pp o Z v W_ CV �.r H O W 1 �S 0� Q' p`d' JWy OJ d d a uj 0,..-1_. .-.d 0 1-0 pwu? pm -� 0 a.. (0 ga wdp w0 (0 m� Nmw Nw 0 » c�Q ceQ W Q m ma• l ,o !a n-, ^- L-y_,. W 'w ' v ft. (7) N A— z PI to W J to c,., - e o G4.9 m £M a ga = gays g_i- o t-_o U ' p mx�e aam /" �m ¢ N PJ " QZ!L 2 @ JQ u { �+ t � q c;.:: i \ v> IX �. �° D !I v1 Ss sssssssss p`° VI o Q z � \ +.essassas e r el O� w x to ° _.=:iwiaa. a c==#` yQ Qdti) Q. M 0�4 f t -4 \s //\% t\'a .Ir fa = g sue` �t isr ter° - .4h , ,,43s,..w 9E't -Li cc /C..\>.1 Q ;r ** W o La Z aq" ms' ...6 W „..,8 z 4 pp N MQ Z 6 IY W 4 Z O Z L� � r6 Q Z =' ~ g t -, t IV SC QJ O W p cTi EL ' Timms Z~ O� (; f� v 0 a 4 f l WZ . ).:. w er Q Z 7 `-5 J41 i 2 a ON OW ® 1' C ZO" tnitd Ll / i w ir'4` 5 2 4,4 i i 0°a• s ,a C o-' n{ditions i ,y-t ok Lve Shoreline � � 4' Lam 1 L Mangro 1f ,�e f7:te i 14;4--.?' �+4 1 : t ,r F�: v 1 d '�*fit_,,..0f,-«,...,,,•S ' l f i S 'i . s ,,1 ce 3 a�, "v a + r � -� x* r h .„ma ��.sz 3 ' 3 u4-. ` a < p te � �, _1f a� ' t � F4 am ,+.' - ;,::(*--.'°;.',ti 'l ,t�'�t!3 e 4`'' y x ; �s Z+. + r a .e� . .�� n :14, . - , r s�, ` 7 y � � r i L � �-7 s . ! w - . - *�R_ !e ,r+ ,„_� a 1 � i, �x � ' s 1a:r' L '` 3 ,f � 'ice.. ,c v ^ t �cr 1 ag F's'r i i i6 � '4., ,' . 3 � 4 t.- a ' 4. y ' �C �t % t ' � � y1 ( 'A K "a �i :� ti t�:.::,,=Z;„,,,,,t1.,=*s Q, 11 , -, - #�'r, s?�,m �€3 3 s : 3,k S3 •5. , !' Y . f u .a� ._• . R ^ s ?r ,t � \ts p.� , �� ``' -e-. -A7`,e--15, ‘,—,--\\,—,L .�"' 4%,re \ lio BDE-PL20150000039 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. Walkway Location "'A 'Mp a`�':t 0 4, . '. X , ,rte y�.s,111-s i ,sq! \t}l' °,' .A I-+a 7' ,-.4".,.4.,,,' < . ..F' 4 �r 1 , r�a \7 #�A..-t f .. -:ice 4_,,..'`.. s y's ,f y 'wq : .,"C7 �' ^.*' ,�:. is / .a r - ' -'.n y yi �, w 'N i„L' V t `. .111e..,,„,„ -'¢ ' ;- .. as h { -'V f,,,,. _, 4 l; A , �* ,, r-g1 5, II- ,....„„ ,,- , „ r- ■ .4,, ......,,,:,,‘ ',,, ).1.1\10 , '' 4rfitat‘ r '*4 I 'A .4*.' -, \,-:., _ y 1 4.;''.V 4,- kr I2... ,- -'.t; � �,- Tom'. m BDE-PL20150000039 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd = _ ,----. 0 -1 • 0 kil ( ( ss.• 0 UJ I. q4C (NI ci) 41 ' V D la CO iri 6 z 1 150 Z •-•ts U '' 0 0 80 X z ,..„ — 0 . 0. sot; v 0 u i a \ 1 4.,.& t....-- 0..., a) a) \ (.1) CI) i- g III-E . I lfii . le : • sell ta (ii 2 11:4 0 Nt.e.0 ] a 03 III /1 ....- u) \ . ?),„ m t..5Izte zEIIII ji t le co c \ el * Z E i3 1-- • oa3 E V, 2 "PI , ce W < aa • "in In 0 C•4: 0, f- ‘"••••.. U* < CD 0) c "1, ‘N\ i 0 .. . .1 . 5 te• .. lv 1 \ _ 2 c .4 11111111111111ff ill e 0 e tp CNI. ; FL a .-V i ltallieSellea .., • .. . ,,z gAtti \ .. . le 1, ..4- -IN - .01s/X:e..,/41/4. .• \ * / 0 _ * ,e` ......, . • If 40 - 44 Ai I t Pfi \ -4r;.4:7 . Alliiille '-•.'':1*',. ' \ .- —* ,..e..-..- ,.. \ st-.2--i, •0 4, - .0.0,, / W 4cC 4 Lti 0 ..o CC ga. Z AC 'et la co \to/§ /.. < ,I- .., 01- /1 / 0 b ix a_ at at 0 a. o izo 0 cn m Lu 4 12.1 W z 0 Li 4. or o,_ .7i ui 0 . at . 0 ui „... w 1 M : . o t—0 re a- a< a . a- CD I!- tt) ' U..I 10 ..---... Ca ...- ID <04 CE1 O. . . , C4 = n 1 .4=4.......,...A".."Z"....."4 ( i VC ta to— 1 CO cr rej In 2 pp a E— a:11' .14163=-F- II- 0?"-N \ •C 4 >"a .::*. ''''''.., 0. Pa ..,..." .....24.4.. g.4 1/4CJ c .... c .s2 •le.— 20 .•-c., = tre, ---.- -.. ° Z.4` .2.g.44 .L ..- - %.• Z.I 0 CD .. — ..—.... '2,' ,cc y.z .* 2 e 2 o co o co 0 0 =.41A—:-,--.... „e., .#0147. a --•ii g 2 >••• < Z 2 to 2— \ 1.4 CC IN 0 0 -....... o f.... r ' - = ■ 4.4 agi 2; \ al SUS MS 0 a. .t.'1 s v> en lttt t e4 0 Z t q MIMS F., alliZZATIONEME CX t, .4114 ui k.,..‘.,...b.: \ -2”—-- ...."'''''' Ci9ke 8 x y ..," \'- II N \ 1 1 -P- ' 1 \ 0 Z it... VN, ',,7-", '','' i 0 \ \ ,-,.-.7":4 i ril(\i>. z Z ,,,,,,,--4 ..„0---ro--,-- ..1 ."s\\ ce i. 'it- - l a 4C (I\ \ = ix 9 uj :3 = ,,•.< 2 0 2 ta , z 0..... en m 2 0 W z i z T 1:5 ac g i cc ua •cc 0 - 0 ui —7.51 I Z a. al tica t4 - i t i 14A )) Friday,February 19,2016 H NAPLES DAILY NEWS PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples Fl 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. BDE-PL20150000039 — A. Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. Brodman request a 22.8 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42.8 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with a boat lift for the benefit of Lot 6, Bayfront Gardens, also described as 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd. in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. LEE COUNTY HICKORY LELY BAY BONITO BEACH ROAD (C.R.865) BAREFOOT J - BEACH / - coaoo L LELY �' PROJECT BAREFOOT BEACH LOCATION d 5 SHORES AUDUBON 404 CNTRY W CLUB A rf *- NAPOLI COUNTRY VILLAGE CWNTRY - CLUB BAY STERLING B FOREST 2 OAKS I HEE B WO WATERGLADES RETREAT PLAZA ,`�/'ry�o ARBOR TRACE VILLAGE PLACE All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite#101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner EXHIBIT Collier County, Florida No.927143 R February 19,2016 )4-MX 3)lo)tb (HEX) March 10, 2016 BD-PL20150001024 Mike Scott February 09, 2016 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on February 19, 2016, and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Rachel Beasley, Planner in the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear, Please reference the followint on ALL invoices; DIVISION:ZONING [Zoning Services Section} FUND& COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number: 076397 Authorized Designee signature for HEX Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples Fl 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. BD-PL20150001024—Mike Scott requests a 42.6-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.6 feet, to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, also described as 206 San Mateo Drive, in Section 6,Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101,Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida 0 ao CO r a° zD � m 30 3 ° 0 0 00 5 4 .----.' co mr- il co P %. E z m m p •D D � n r0 o, �� i; o o ir vo► iiii 1 ,� 0 ri, 0 0 > 0 0 c z 1 I I czc 01 CO � r z > co c -I co D o —I > 73 00 � � r'' M o � cn co D r- m((A < ° Z 0 --I (C.R. 901)7 N VAND RBILT DR. m w a 0 13 xi / n D 0 m L rn rn m Im O c m 1^, 1 n O `� 0 N m 0 2�1 IWdIW 1 Dcn (i.b .s.n) -IId Irilltill. Acct #076397 February 9, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples News Media 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 Re: BD-PL20150001024 - Scott Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Friday, February 19, 2016 and send duplicate Affidavits of Publication, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500161942 February 09, 2016 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on February 19, 2016, and furnish proof of publication to the attention of the Board's Minutes and Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 401, Naples, Florida 34112. The advertisement must be a 1/4 paqe advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section) FUND & COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500161942 Account Number: 076397 Authorized Designee signature for HEX Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples FL 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. BD-PL20150001024—Mike Scott requests a 42.6-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.6 feet, to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, also described as 206 San Mateo Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101,Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida 0 CC) m n- al�� onm -< 30 ° = 0 0 4 °° r 1 ill o F,-, m D 0 D , n _� 1 II mi— - k ;:r4W,J"Fellir V o _ MO L O. 11 o r z °c cn co 5 r Z 00 0 m y0r- > Z 70 m X 0 c 2 1:13 0 rn '{ I o Z -� (C.R. 901) A _ N VAND RBILT DR. u) D I O33 xi / I— y O Fri m m H C- m rz o c Fri fn O n Z co -< Z C7 0 Nm° >U) ( del IWdIWdl fib •s•n) �i uU Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 11:50 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: BD-PL20150001024 Scott (HEX 3-10-15) Attachments: BD-PL20150001024 Scott (HEX 3-10-16).doc; BD-PL20150001024 Scott (HEX 3-10-16).doc; BD-PL20150001024 Scott (HEX 3-10-16 Map).pdf Hello, Please advertise the following attached ad Friday, February 19, 2016. Please forward an ok when received, if you have any questions feel free to call me. Thanks, Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Dept. Clerk of the Circuit Court & Value Adjustment Board Office: (239) 252-7240 Fax: (239) 252-8408 E-mail: martha.vergara(acollierclerk.com 1 Martha S. Vergara From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori @naplesnews.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 4:29 PM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: Proof 937410 Attachments: NDNB937410.pdf Please see proof attached for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist 0: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.gori a(�NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 ;11.11e5 MAUI Nrat5 NapiZsNews, 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. BD-PL20150001024- Mike Scott requests a 42.6-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.6 feet, to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, also described as 206 San Mateo Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. LEE COUNTY (C.R.865) LELY BONITA BEACH ROAD PROJECT BBEACAREFOOT H �-' =111l— LOCATION CONDO no DTTLE Y Lay HICKOR BAV LY :1-(' BONITA -1 SHORES BAREFOOT 5 BEACH AUDUBON 0 H COUNTRY Al CLUB LEE CO. 17fir COUNTRY ' CLUB O :1 BAY "_ 8 FOREST B �r THE TWO ��✓�✓y'I� LPLAZA \\�VilJ WATERGLADES j RETREAT AKES I— All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.937410 February 19.2016 Martha S. Vergara From: Stone, Scott Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 5:01 PM To: Martha S.Vergara; BeasleyRachel; Rodriguez,Wanda;Ashton, Heidi Subject: RE: BD-PL20150001024 - Scott Approved! Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney Collier County Attorney's Office (239) 252-5740 From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara(acollierclerk.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 4:32 PM To: BeasleyRachel; RodriguezWanda; AshtonHeidi; StoneScott Subject: BD-PL20150001024 - Scott Hello All, Attached is the ad proof from NDN for you to review, let me know of any changes needed. Thanks, Martha Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Martha S. Vergara From: BeasleyRachel <RachelBeasley @colliergov.net> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 9:52 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: Ann P.Jennejohn; Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael; Kendall, Marcia; Lang, Ashley; Neet, Virginia; Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: Corrected Mailing: 206 San Mateo Dr, 2/19/16 Advertisement Attachments: 206 San Mateo HEX Advertisement Request.docx; 206 San Mateo (2x3) Map.pdf Good morning, The title for this has slightly changed. Could I swap out the one I sent for the attached, updated, document? Please let me know if you have any questions. Best, Rachel Beasley, Planner Planning and Zoning Division Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department— Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.8202; Fax: 239.252.6483 Z ql r C0141e1ty Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples Fl 34104,to consider: Mike Scott requests a 42.7-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.7 feet,to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, also described as 206 San Mateo Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S.Vergara Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 10:38 AM To: 'Gori, Ivonne' Subject: RE: Proof 937410 Ivonne, Now the department has asked for two small changes to the HEX Ad.. Lines 1 reads 42.6-foot boat dock (should read 42.7) & line 3 reads 62.6 feet (should read 62.7 feet) PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 10th, 2016. in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104. to consider: 77 PETITION NO BD-PL201 5000 1 024- Mike Scott requests a 42.K foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.kfeet, to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One. also described as 206 San Mateo Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. 1 From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:ivonne.gori @naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 4:29 PM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: Proof 937410 Please see proof attached for your review and approval. Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist 0: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.gori c(DNaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 ''ap1L5;lath; 'Sous :. r4 sNews.Gom Martha S. Vergara From: Gori, Ivonne <ivonne.gori @naplesnews.com> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:02 PM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: REVISED Proof 937410 Attachments: NDNB937410 (1).pdf Please find revised Proof attached. Thanks! Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist 0: 239.213.6061 E: ivonne.gorina NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 N4 I 1444: NaptesNews 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. BD-PL20150001024- Mike Scott requests a 42.7-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.7 feet, to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, also described as 206 San Mateo Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. LEE COUNTY (C.R.865) LELY BONITA BEACH ROAD PROJECT BAREFOOT - LOCATION CONDO �I�L LITTLE HICKORY BAY LELY � BONITA SHORES BAREFOOT 'L 5 BEACH � ` AUDUBON 0 C. COUNTRY 111 CLUB J LEE CO. grit, Air r � COUNT `X, RY COUNTRY CLUB BAY FOREST B THE Two LANES (Wil WATERGLADES RETREAT PLAZA I� All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.937410 February 19.2016 Martha S. Vergara From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 2:29 PM To: Martha S. Vergara Cc: BeasleyRachel; Stone, Scott Subject: FW: Ad revision - BD-PL20150001024 Scott Attachments: NDNB937410 (1).pdf Looks OK to me. Wanda Rodriguez, MCP .Advanced Certified ParaCegaC Office of the County Attorney (239)252-8400 From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara©collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:47 PM To: BeasleyRachel; RodriguezWanda Subject: Ad revision - BD-PL20150001024 Scott Importance: High Hi Wanda & Rachel, Attached is the revision with the corrected measurements. Let me know if there is anything else. Thanks, Martha Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 14Ai Friday,February 19,2016l1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS PUBLIC NOTICE W, moot*s •.• W ,i';', •' +_ , NOTICE OF PU r , M , s Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. BD-PL20150001024 Mike Scott requests a 42.7-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.7 feet,to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for;;tt*Y enefit of Lot 28,Southport on the Bay, Unit One also described as 206 San Mateo Drive,in Section 0,Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. LEE COUNTY • (V 5 NW taY ..i'4 ..PROJECT. eA:77 • L ®• �: LOCATION eEAar �" 1 coHao L -"tag, H cuv Cr " FY �14 yT4" a B 11EA0lir • lk t axe� COUNTRY mi A� THE TWO ,� � WA1 OMER HE1eEAT W-51 ,_ All interested parties are invited to appear and-be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing.. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department,Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered atsuch meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 TamiamrTrail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.937410 February 19.2016 ?htpLri ahL1J ru t _i 1i ' 1 NaplesNews.com E✓ 2 - 1 2ot I Published Daily By Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# COLLIER COUNTY HEX 937410 PUBLIC HEARING 45-161942 Pub Dates February 19,2016 1 an,,,P if?;`.,P77-- (Sign ure of affiant) imosaduirrodimishodbriumaridiare ""'• IVONNE GOBI Sworn to and subscribed before me I .''r'�"r`�'`'` Notary Public-State of Florida �•This February 4,2016 1 ty....: • •= Commission #r FF 900570 ;� My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 I / 1 :R;,,.n• Bonded through National Notary Assn. A�tr' . (Signatur of affiant) ' 14A a Friday,February 19,2016 I NAPLES DAILY NEWS Probe:El Faro second mate texted storm warning to captain By Jason 011111711 and texted El Faro Capt. A crew of Polish sailors of months before El Faro's Assxaad Press Michael Davidson to was aboard the El Faro, last voyage. make sure he was aware working to prepare it for A broken wind speed Before the freighter El of it. -- its upcoming move to the gauge presented few dif- Faro sank,the captain "He came back tom Alaska trade,he said,and ficulties for experienced was warned by a text and said yes,and thank " the slower route was ex- mariners,Baird said. message from his vaca- you,"Baird said."When) ' � " petted to be smoother so "[can probably esti- boning second mate that saw it had developed into r'"_., they could work. mate it within 5 knots," a storm looming offshore a Category I hurricane,I °• A Polish crew was he said. was forecast to become a texted him again(to ask) aboard the El Faro when Not much could dis- hurricane,according to what his plan was going it set sail during Joaquin suade Tote's captains K testimony Thursday. to be." too,yet the more direct from setting sail and in 0 Second Mate Charles Davidson texted that route closer to the storm getting their cargo deliv-I Z Baird testified before a he planned to follow his was chosen. ered,Baird said.While U.S.Coast Guard panel normal route but would / While en route to arriving on time was im- ix Jacksonville investi- skirt"under,"or south,of Puerto Rico,Davidson portant,Baird said there C < gating the ship's sinking Hurricane Joaquin,Baird ' emailed company offi- were no penalties for late = ill last October.The APcov- said. msaaumnws-uxnx cials the day before the delivery. 0 = ered the hearing viaalive The captain had used El Faro sank,asking if "Was there ever any in- webcast. a different approach dur- Charles Baird,former second mate of the El Faro,left,and he could take the slower stance where did you not V = V All 33 aboard,includ- ing another strong storm Capt.Mike Kucharski,with the National Transportation Safety route home.A company sail from port because L ing three men from Lee just about a month earlier, Board,discuss route options available to the El Faro when official said yes. of adverse,bad wrath- County,died after the Baird said. dealing with the approaching hurricane during a Thursday Testimony also re- er,"asked Capt.Michael V CO vessel lost propulsion Davidson had rerouted hearing investigating the ship's October sinking. vealed that the El Faro Kucharski, a National r and was hit by the strong to a slower,safer route in may have been sailing Transportation Safety o Q r n winds of Hurricane Joa- August during Tropical officials with the compa- Baird said it was his without the aid of a wind Board marine accident ✓ Z Q d quip,aCategory4 storm. Storm Erika after a com- ny that owns the ships, idea to sail the slower speed gauge called an investigator participat- Baird said he was at pany alert was sent out. Tote Services Inc.,have route through the Old anemometer. ing in the panel. home when he saw news No company alert was said they don't routinely Bahama Channel during Baird said it had not "No,we always sailed," of the storm on television sent out for Joaquin,and send out warnings. Erika. been working for a couple Baird said. N o ORCHID . a A.R.A. INSURANCE °' ' 5 Premiums Gone Through the Roof? w d o Slash your homeowners premium :7 �' C O. SALE DAYS-WED.,FEB. 17IHTHRU SUN.,FEB.21ST by combining homeowners& NC O 'V wino coverage into one policy 0) U fn Hundreds to 25% OFF 20%%OFF while receiving maximum / ` a c) N CD Choose From' mitigation credits, Q Q (n 0 Dendrobiums, GLAZED We can insure homes up t0 Phalaenopss, with purchase ORCHID POTS $15 Million with wind Cattleyas, Paphlopedilum, of 2 or more 10%OFF coverage included. �'. Onadium,yes dns, Masdevallia varieties ORCHID SUPPLIES Jim Bonfitto &many other exotic orchids Tracy StOhna9 orchids nand array WHILE SUPPLIES LAST ---- GAR E Joe Bennett If o : GARDEN c In stock varieties may CENTER in "Sei"'" DRIFTWOOD 239-394-0888 www.aramarco.com N NAPLES 261-0325 G a It t c c Ii N r IC a ESTERO 947.9676 a) ,b tt tutn mPne edge N. T4svvrs.*Iftwnadgarden ante Horne. Just South Esteraa rr. 583 Tallwood Street#102•Marco Island,FL 3414',' 0 K PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE 'Cr < v < NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING O) Z M Z Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,March 10th,2016,in Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,March 10th,2016, the Hewing Examiner's Meeting Room,at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Room in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room,at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, a) 609/610,Naples Fl 34104,to consider: Room 609/610,Naples FL 34104,to consider: E PETITION NO.BDE-PL20150000039—A.Douglas Brodman and Teresa A. PETITION NO.BD-PL20150001024—Mike Scott requests a 42.7-foot boat Z Brodman request a 22.8 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Q limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion Land Development Code,for a total protrusion of approximately 62.7 feet,to c T of 42.8 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with a boat lift for the benefit accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new E 0 (— of Lot 6,Bayfront Gardens,also described as 232 Barefoot Beach Blvd.in dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28,Southport on the Bay, 3 LE ,_ Section 6,Township 48 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida. Unit One,also described as 206 San Mateo Drive,in Section 6,Township 48 ■ Z a) a) O South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida. QF O �\ LEE rCOUNTTY r`';` ..,, ` LEE COUNTY V m°° ,W, 1 it .1 PROJECT I .o .o,o PROJECT LOCATION `, .(--" r: LOCATION I G I�,-. , Il ` a. xb LEE CO. El rte'` . 1,.. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of in presentation before the Hewing Examiner will become a permanent part of ,^ I w rI the record. the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing.The file can Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing.The file can 0 be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department,Zoning be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department,Zoning N Division,Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL Division,Zoning Services Section,2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL 1W The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a ���--tTT�--��,f person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing (a V Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, ((((���i he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need I to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. 4�..x� r.V If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order If you area person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order 4-.: = to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities LL Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101,Naples, Management Division located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples, ).yI � Florida 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Florida 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. W Mark Strain, Mark Strain, ^L4�, 4 I.L. Chief Hearing Examiner Chief Hearing Examiner e■ell) e. Collier County,Florida Collier County,Florida :4 ` No a27149 February is 2018 No.991410 February it 2018 ' Lai LL OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Minutes & Records, Clerk of Courts FROM: Wanda Rodriguez, ACP /2 fr DATE: March 18, 2016 RE: Hearing Examiner Decision(s) from March 10, 2016. Attached are the signed HEX decisions from the Hearing Examiner hearing on March 10, 2016. Attachments: HEX No. 2016 — 09 HEX No. 2016— 1.0 [05-COA-01253/813 782/11744 HEX NO. 2016— 10 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. BD-PL20150001024— Mike Scott requests a 42.7-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.7 feet, to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, also described as 206 San Mateo Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. DATE OF HEARING: March 10, 2016 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant -t l3 iablic,, and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition is approved. ANALYSIS: Other than a representative of the applicant, there were no members of the public in attendance for this item and there were no objections received by staff. Staff received letters of no objection from both abutting neighbors. DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition No. BD-PL20150001024, filed by Mike Scott, for a 42.7-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 62.7 feet, to allow the replacement of an existing docking facility with a new docking facility with a boat lift on the property described herein, in accordance with the Proposed Site Plan attached as Exhibit"A", and as subject to the condition(s) set forth below. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A—Proposed Site Plan Exhibit B—Restoration Plan [15-CPS-01465/1243287/1]43 1 of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 28, of SOUTHPORT ON THE BAY, UNIT ONE, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages 51 through 53, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. CONDITIONS: 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. The restoration work as detailed in the approved Restoration Plan (attached as Exhibit `B") must be completed and approved by County Environmental staff by time of Certificate of Completion(C.C.) for the dock. DISCLAIMER: Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners or the Board of Zoning Appeals, as appropriate. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. / n - l tP _2p 1 1. Date Mark Strain, Hearing Examiner Appr•*-d as toi rm and legality: luso Scott A Sto,- Assistant County Attorney [15-CPS-01465/1243287/1143 2 of 2 I r �oyy co 0 4., 411,7'"� 9kCO F.. O it O d f �.+u a my r10 �„ RI ti o"S n al c II [�r+ l/ 1/ .. 1 F- • VJ b N e n ..___________E---fti ( t w6d O m n _ .� w o co 9...I. LJ N a• N O v- J w <y ' CO j�oy�0 9Sp ci Cl a o orEr�wa2 �. 3 Q m a xbd° o Ki \ a �w�bx 1 w �u < W 0°�7 °sm x 3 W w Q �Y xHZE1�U Z i LL / '�' OQ U_.y1 mOio7./y 'Slt� a JZ O�f xm g J p O ck o pw° Hb X W('y6�:y� �' f • ° 0� _¢ s� Chm Yid d§% 0 o N as z �Yirmo 0 ■ th In TS B- xs•t as ° +�-, i� W x '� ,£8£ ,0 4 U'S I a'ly ,0'9l 0 `J CV N ,0 o i ° f / AIL.14 Pe z -t n 7 ,+ O , . s / a Z e° ° .z'a,�o fir. ,£'4" ° / °� vFi A /ii,1- A 4r 6, + .OZI /0 W .n + a w • aD _'_-__- __ N �R W vv Y 0 = z in a z w a a N m W Z d W W a z W z O QH W 1. v °Z JJ d rl N" in ro W 0 0 07 Z Z o g m of j J cr o! N p CO a W W w p U p O _ a F zz ° g J U n w w p¢ Q. N N O J 3 ; �N� O c-) Z o zz N m z zI- o f "I N Q Sl^?p>p>I N J C\1 w Q w Q to T N J Z"1 3 �' ›- O O d, w U m °' ��a ~ II II II II II Z z m n:- i-° !n <.<S 0 �iI°a n`� w 3°w J CIOavb 3 2 2 m 0 O0 z ww J SC00 J }� a Q¢w I- Z V wW Q Fg MJ 0 oa i+�oa z H�Q —__— W v 00 oN- O a_I it ��w—— i ° 0Za oZo> W Gn=a Z wa w >w .DAlel0 021bW Nvs Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 6 LiJIPLIJ JLZ SY1fix 206 San Mate© Drive Folio ID#74435003103 S06/T4SS/R2a,Collier County,FL ° L INTRODUCTION Collier County Environmental staff are currently reviewing an application for a docking facility located at 206 San Mateo Drive,submitted by Orick Marine. The County's review determined that the existing 20-foot Conservation Easement area along the property shoreline has been impacted with till and non-native landscape plantings. This work within the easement area was not authorized therefore Collier County staff are requiring that the Conservation Easement area be restored to natural conditions by removing fill and planting the area with native shrubs and groundcover. The property is identified on the property appraiser's website as 74435003103, which is approximately 0.24 acre lot situated within Section 06,Township 48 South, and Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida. This document outlines the restoration plan for the onsite Conservation Easement area It EXISTING CONDITIONS: HABITAT&SOIL DESCRIPTIONS The subject site consists of 0.24 acre dedicated to a single-family residential dwelling with a 20-foot wide (0.05 acre) conservation easement area along the shoreline. The conservation easement area was impacted with the placement of fill material and landscaped plantings. The existing plantings within the easement area consist of a ficus hedge (Ficus benjamina), cordgrass (Spartina app), and scaevola (Scaevola plumien). The groundcover within this area consists of St Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum). The conservation easement area will be restored as required by Collier County Environmental Staf£ Existing soil is fill placed on the property at the time the residence was constructed. Much of this fill will be removed from the easement area as part of this restoration plan. • III. PROPOSED PLANTINGS/RESTORATION The owner is proposing to restore the conservation easement area(0.05 acres)by removing the fill that was placed there during the construction of the house and creating a consistent slope being approximately 8:1,from the remaining upland fill area to the existing natural shoreline elevation. This will allow for a very gradual slope and once the fill is removed the proposed plantings outlined below will be installed throughout the easement area. 1 Exhibit "B" Page 2 of 6 The proposed plantings shall include a minimum 0111 midstory trees on 20' centers consisting of red mangroves and buttonwood trees,which will be placed higher up on the slope to ensure their survival, The groundcover will consist of 128 plants on 3' centers including leather fern,sea oxeye, and bay cedar which will be located higher up on the slope to help ensure their survival. All species listed should be utilized in even amounts if possible,but exact species numbers could be based on supply availability. Planting specifics are outlined below, Midstory plants: Nuigber of Trees=11 Red Mangrove(Rhyzophora mangle) 6 Buttonwood(Conocarpus erectus) 5 All midstory plantings will be installed on 20ft.centers with a minimum 1-3 gallon pot containers. Groundcover pJlants: Numlber of Plants=128 Sea Oxeye(Borrichia frutescens) 78 Bay Cedar(Suriaria maritlrna) 25 Leather Fern(Acrostichum aureum) 25 All groundcover plantings will be installed on 3ft. centers with a minimum 1 gallon pot containers. Please see attached exhibits for approximate layout of the proposed planting area. Irrigation maybe required for the top half of the easement area due to the distance from the ground water table to help ensure the plantings survival. For the lower half of the easement no irrigation is proposed due to the final elevations of this portion of the conservation easement being connected to the tidal water table which will keep the plantings hydrated naturally. IV. CREDENTIALS Jeff Rogers Project Manager for Thrall,Hall&Associates since 2005 B.S.Degree in Environmental Science,Rollins College Sustainable Development Course-Galapagos Islands,Equador Completed Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Wetland Delineation Training Course-2006 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Environmental Resource Permit Course-2006 Completed a FAEP Plant ID Class with Dr.Hall from the University of Florida- 2006 Primary career focus:Permit Compliance Mitigation and Monitoring 2 Exhibit "B" 3o Page f6 J XA. mm f. -TLJ'1 A C m O m� 0 /cn��d ..teOat I Ng L :n r rlitil hi mil lila VI cf) ill 1 K ®r 'I;ITN ot cD 11 ll r R°o o, m ` Xn W�M �� r 7,o� Z D (f."O z m a o ry z �/ 1 orn"118_ T m k W � c O� �� i 'D w Oz n° E 4r �z � oD e O 0 c U OZ °�o mZ z iiiipi Ci ;y ,,fi � ' rn =I ,91 xS ? *++ f t a og P '{ O ■ ''' �N u v A p a r m N N Ex " " Page hibit 4 of B 6 0,7-4.,WS. : _ ' '''''''''' ' ' : �► ,,fx2 .1s. / - , , ,,,,,,_ T R �•c H _ 2> ' 1 b p m atd0R° m g .-cv n cn 'A=, 1=1 ° o p Z dir 4 , , '' ■ ( rV.) 4. 0 q I 4 .y 1 _ --- ,g am : K.1-....,6.:,-,,,.,,,-,!.7:: .,-,244,..,‘,.1.e. 7-t7-'-.010:„.40,.44,s,,,,,-- 4—.- . - " " ' ."' ' ""* ' - '' '' N ID z v� o m 1 v;ill q f gyp ' / 1 Fit e z Ii N z 1'01 N a m Exhibit "B" Page 5of6 i i t I g Er. g RP x O -z+DI 9- -0 a zR ›.- rn zg4 w O U 2 -a....., cn N N UQ _ O T�J ,- _ _ _ ,_ _. 0 _ _ _ __ _ __ 1 ' _I I F D : ZO Z _-' . __._ (---- . Z DD I � —TTI 2 0 ° m0 rn < p co ��� O _ C P• O w z z y 2 c O O 0;E ' o 0 - X R N o o o o N m l i�—,� 0"•w N 1 d 0 o � o 0 O Z 0 C / ' F Q N O � � co Q _ O _Q r ;51 I \s—\--C------ -- M 6o4; XE4> hi r\ 0 tJ m ►% I� m W YI Exhibit "B" Page 6 of 6 '/ I , �_ .1)11".� m 0 m E e - A D A m z V- - 4 q \ I II 0 $EE.c 0 -- � -- l g.z <m w til es N o at I < °— 0o G R° 0 m e n er �. i ,f., .-.y i 1 I 'i p • i ,, N N CT CONSERVATION__ 0 ( r EASEMENT A • 4m4 • 1 � � ' �, j+ r CA V! ` ' CD D `' I co Z s o • Z K t o Do n —I 0 a 70 G p O N 2 O O m zE p A M O I: 0 Z1..-''."--"....-...-"-..---"."'-.'-:::.-'' .' b Z 0 m N CONSERVATION ', "' EASEMENT ■ i AGENDA ITEM 4-B Co er County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING: MARCH 10, 2016 SUBJECT: BD-PL20150001024, 206 SAN MATEO DRIVE BOAT DOCK EXTENSION PROPERTY APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner/ Katherine A Scott, Agent: Greg Orick II Applicant: Revocable Self Declaration of Trust Greg Orick II Marine Construction Mike Scott 27171 Driftwood Drive 206 San Mateo, FL 34134 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests a 42.7-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code (LDC), for a total protrusion of approximately 62.7 feet, to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject site is located at Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, also described as 206 San Mateo Drive. The folio number is 74435003103. (See attached Location Map.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the project is a request for a 42.7-foot boat dock extension beyond the maximum 20 feet for the subject lot. The boat dock facility will contain one boat slip and one kayak/personal watercraft lift. The total overwater dock structure proposed is approximately 668 square feet and will protrude a total of 62.7 feet into a waterway that is approximately 860 feet from Mean High Water(MHW) line to the MHW. There is no dredging proposed for this project and the total length shoreline is approximately 97.58 linear feet. A single-family house exists on the site. BD-PL20150001024 2 EXHIBIT Page 1 of 8 206 San Mateo Drive Boat Dock Extension J4eA( Sitoltb I . ' g 6- �Ni m � tsO ' .9 vys is3* 13�us am 9 LL>_ V 6 k9 l I I I I Q = m $ $� 232 ; 120 . f:12 o� - n G z H < _ 6 �gm 2 a. ex N Q ti i 2 \l$AIVI e' oil, Azov CD ■,. ,„g eAtt$401-1■47-0) ,6 g tale Ili ATI r Z \ ■......___ 4 1g I vie 0 toy ' et taaVrillika>40 V116 C cx .c L.., g uli,m3 im.,, \ '4.. a. NI a W o _ 21 x , N J T1V2S at laM aI CO 4t 1 avow atanna lapdan I • Z � � raj r a � ( F. Z 1q� ii _, D ii O i h2 791 Hi G. J • �• Al yy N d 11 0 Ng g . � X11 r- 1 is IV i e g-- Yi " a - ar. 1„s-. TI.MNM�tPNL' IU.S.41, 33 pp �- F- `! F '. z ¢g 0 RI CL~ I i 8o u l\?�7 ILOS ,o1) as l € 111110,►="h Ix 4. �� avno i1eawrrvn I f' ' " ., o:; _' v w ; J YSXIC0 aF GULF Ail SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: Single-family house, zoned Lely Barefoot Beach PUD SURROUNDING: North: Single-family house with a boat dock, zoned PUD East: Little Hickory Bay, across which are single-family houses, zoned PUD South: Single-family house with a boat dock, zoned PUD West: San Mateo Drive,across which are single-family houses, zoned PUD jp, , N. IN . .. ltai .."E" x 4„„,,, ..*,..,. .„., r 11 -. "'.'CoumV�Yem►ms..*.....l t.., 0...17ft Aerial of subject property(Collier County Appraiser) ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. Section 5.03.06(E)(11), of the Land Development Code (LDC), Manatee Protection, is applicable to multi-slip docking facilities with ten(10) or more slips. The proposed facility consists of one boat slip and is therefore not subject to the provisions of this section. No submerged resources were found within the proposed dock area. A Restoration Plan has been created and approved for the restoration of the Conservation Easement area that was established under the Lely Estates, Inc. Settlement Agreement. STAFF COMMENTS: The Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny, a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria in LDC Section 5.03.03 H. In order for the HEX to approve this request, it must find that at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria have been met. BD-PL20150001024 Page 3 of 8 206 San Mateo Drive Boat Dock Extension Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06 H and recommends the following findings to the HEX: Primary Criteria 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks,additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility consists of one boat slip, which is appropriate in relation to the 97.58 linear feet of water frontage of the subject lot. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. According to the petitioner's application the water depth within this area of Little Hickory Bay is extremely shallow and the existing water depths are insufficient to moor a motorized vessel. Water depth measured approximately 30 feet from the property line is 1.69 feet NAVD below Mean Low Water Line (MLWL). Please note that the conversion from NAVD to NGVD in this area is approximately 1.22; to convert from NAVD to NGVD one must add 1.22 to 1.69, so this is 2.91 feet NGVD. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, the proposed facility will not adversely impact navigation due to the width of the existing waterway which is 860 feet. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) BD-PL20150001024 Page 4 of 8 206 San Mateo Drive Boat Dock Extension Criterion met. Information provided in the application indicates that the proposed dock will protrude 62.7 feet into a waterway that is 860 feet in width. The measurement 62.7 feet is 7.3 percent into a waterway that is 860 feet in width. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. According to the drawings submitted and noted by the petitioner,the proposed facility has been designed to fall within the subject riparian lines (with a required side-yard of 15 feet) and does not interfere with adjacent neighboring docks or access. The applicant has supplied letters of no objection from 2 adjacent neighbors. Secondary Criteria 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement,shoreline configuration,mangrove growth,or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The subject shoreline contains mangroves and a Restoration Plan has been created for the restoration of the Conservation Easement area in the rear of this property. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. As shown on the drawing submitted by the petitioner, the dock area is not excessive, permitting the docking of one vessel, permitting launching of a kayak/personal water crafts (PWCs), and permitting lifts, a nautical function, for kayaks/PWCs. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion met. As indicated on the application,the length of the vessel is 25 feet and is less than 50%of the property's linear waterfront footage of 97.58 feet. BD-PL20150001024 Page 5 of 8 206 San Mateo Drive Boat Dock Extension 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The existing mangrove fringe obstructs the view of Little Hickory Bay from the first floor of residences. The view shed of neighboring properties will not be impacted. The proposed dock facility will be consistent with existing docks along the shoreline. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner's consultant (Turrell, Hall & Associates), the submerged resource survey did not find any seagrass beds. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion not applicable. The petitioner's property is a single-family lot with one slip and is not subject to the provisions of the Manatee Protection Plan. Staff analysis indicates that this request meets five of the five primary criteria. Regarding the six secondary criteria, criterion 6 is not applicable, and the request meets five of the remaining five secondary criteria. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONERS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the HEX takes action, an aggrieved petitioner, or adversely affected property owner, may appeal such final action to the Board of County Commissioners. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Department Administrator within 30 days of the Decision by the HEX. In the event that the petition has been approved by the HEX, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW The Office of the County Attorney reviewed this Staff Report on 2/16/16. BD-PL20150001024 Page 6 of 8 206 San Mateo Drive Boat Dock Extension STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve Petition BD-PL20150001024. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Application BD-PL20150001024 Page 7 of 8 206 San Mateo Drive Boat Dock Extension PREPARED BY: RACHEL BEASLE I ,PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: 7?. / 2 . I7 'f RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION APPROVED BY: 2'/st— i c, MIKE BOSI, AICP,DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION BD-PL20150001024 Page 8 of 8 206 San Mateo Drive Boat Dock Extension Co I _ rCounty Pi20150001024 REV 1 'mss v: -+� 2=-17- CCiIY il �, + l i Gate at e- - _ _ Assigned Planner: . Engineering Manager(for PPL's and FP's): w - as,.7.,.- �...._ Project Name: cc�—"�1 �r CCh egiskitkia PL#: 1Q24 Property ID#:a 1 ___Current Zoning: —1._ . Project Address: 5 . `�� � '�ity: .;'_t�::+. State:R._ Zip: 51131---- 11, ;:'" . Applicant: Agent Name: ic Eg a 14 L W Phone: t71e�J•' �[dam`? Agent/Firm Address: City: State: Zip: Property Owner: MN* Please provide the following,if applicable: i. Total Acreage: R. Proposed it of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments,indicate the original petition number: — v. if there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: L -E � —' vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Rev 4/1/15 Attachment 1 _Artiii„,,,...........- _, -..: cot. .:. nty. ::.: .. . ____ _4_,-,,.mtzw....24..—ziv4., =:.45. ,, ,,- .:,....1.7. ..4t..:_ wt,„.x_&,,,:m.,.,_.,_::14.:k7trtio:4:w:„.wi v,.i,:,:.__„...:„7„,f_.,,.„:...„,.%,,,_,__ _, ,rw!. ....,,w_._ ._;:4:_ _,,,::,.r.t..,.._,±o_:_:!..:sta.._. :..:_:tt.,Er,:zi.,...t.: leatteci 5u214, -.-:;., ri.D .4-1-,E . . , - aft, ' ffeigieflAE _ 111 . if r. .3 _;„:"._,Ace-OF wIrAa.7.).A .,...:_zaz11 _It itilit_l_R f.or /r i + A. ' ► I IP 1, . .1'Id •ce : , . =" lkill lee Ale# MI-. . tiff-iftefloe /Zei-s444a4k ,cciA.v.ep- f ' 411111P 0$4e. Jew . k,.' , r.:. : .I 1w-e,' 1 , I Rev 411115 Co Ter County PC 20150001024 REV 1 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: % Dock Extension I ( Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code Thefollowing Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal,the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. OF NOT REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES s REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 6 15 Signed and Sealed Survey _n L&I Chart of Site Waterway Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank,seawall,or rip-rap revetment); • Configuration, location,and dimensions of existing and proposed 6 fl facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property;and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization,signed and notarized /2 C Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Electronic copy of all required documents *Please advise:The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials 1Z [ i to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/3/2014 Page 6 of 7 Co r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.coIliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 PLANNERS—INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Environmental Review:See Pre-Application Executive Director ' Meeting Sign-In Sheet 1. Addressing:Annis Moxam 'g Graphics:Mariam Ocheltree City of Naples:Robin Singer,Planning Director t] Historical Review ❑ Comprehensive Planning:See Pre-Application Meeting Sign-In Sheet 1:=1 Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL:Nichole Ryan ❑ Parks and Recreation:Vicky Ahmad `2 County Attorney's Office:Heidi Ashton-Cicko ❑ Transportation Pathways:Stacey Revay ❑ Emergency Management:Dan Summers;and/or ❑ School District(Residential Components):Amy EMS:Artie Bay Heartlock _ ❑ Engineering:Alison Bradford [1] Transportation Planning:John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS: Boat Dock Extension Petition:$1,500.00 11 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 ?( An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist' 'ncluded in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal informati, may re tin the f processing this petition. 1 Signature of Petit!ner or Agent Date 6/3/2014 Page 7 of 7 Cot the County Pre-Application Meeting Sign-In Sheet PL#: (C` Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Richard Anderson Environmental Review 252-2483 richardanderson @colliergov.net ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony @colliergov.net ❑ Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque @ colliergov.net ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch @colliergov.net ❑ Madelin Bunster Architectural Review 252-8523 madelinbunster @colliergov.net ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@colliergov.net ❑ George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio @colliergov.net ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst.County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton @colliergov.net ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner @colliergov.net ❑ Eric Fey,P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2434 eric€ey @colliergov.net ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman @colliergov.net ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons @colliergov.net ❑ Nancy Gundlach,AICP,PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach @colliergov.net ❑ Shar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson @ccfco.org ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth @colliergov.net ❑ Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes @colliergov.net ❑ Alicia Humphries Right-Of-Way Permitting 252-2326 aliciahumphries @ colliergov.net ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall @colliergov.net ❑ Reed Jarvi,P.E. Transportation Planning 252-5849 reedjarvi @colliergov.net ❑ Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger @colliergov.net ❑ Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins @colliergov.net ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto @colliergov.net ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna @colliergov.net ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean @colliergov.net ❑ Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz @ colliergov.net ❑ Michele Mosca,AICP Impact Fee Administration 252-2466 michelemosca @colliergov.net ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam @colliergov.net ❑ Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree @colliergov.net ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero @colliergov.net ❑ Bill Pancake North Naples Fire District 252-2310 bilipancake @colliergov.net ❑ John Podczerwinsky Transportation Planning 252-5890 johnpodczerwinsky @ colliergov.net Rev 4/1115 ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard @colliergov.net ❑ Fred Reischl,AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl @colliergov.net ❑ Brett Rosenblum,P.E. Stormwater Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum @colliergov.net Michael Sawyer Zoning Services 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net ❑ Corby Schmidt,AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt @colliergov.net ❑ Chris Scott,AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net • ❑ Daniel Smith,AICP Landscape Review 252-4312 danielsmith @colliergov.net ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone @colliergov.net ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252 1116 markstrain @colliergov.net ❑ Carolina Valera Comprehensive Planning 252-8498 carolinavalera @colliergov.net ❑ Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen @colliergov.net ❑ Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh @colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks,AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks @colliergov.net ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie @colliergov.net ❑ Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 ChristineWilloughby @colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email r re 111 S. ll C�Cl/. � l7 CC (7f:cbG � /�nC:nt�CarLyF a��"��°\' lr‘-Co @ ('zf:tkihnr:c►C.COM L i tRdsi u, Gfi c5 at i cy-r- 94q- S a . ►\ I.ill A)41_46 . (kv--(5\ 0 r■cL ffi,c1-,--(- cii-g-L5a 1.1 _` ►c lrte,k 1Ve ca.S le/ . .o A C se4 IA CA4 Rev 4/1/15 Col'.1. r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION LDC Section 5.03.06 Ch. 3 B. of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR(check one): 10 DOCK EXTENSION ( I BOATHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED PL 2015 0 0 0 10 24 REV 1 APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant(s): Mike Scott Address: 206 San Mateo Drive City: Bonita Springs State: FL ZIP: 34134 Telephone: 708-473-6650 Cep: N/A Fax: NIA E-Mail Address: mike @scottgc.com Name of Agent: Greg Orick II Firm: Greg Orick II Marine Construction Inc. Address: 27171 Driftwood Drive City: Bonita Springs State: FL ZIP: 34135 Telephone: 239-949-5588 Cell: Fax: 239-301-2238 E-Mail Address: info @orickmarine.com PROPERTY LOCATION Section/Township/Range: 6 /48 /25 Property I.D.Number: 74435003103 Subdivision: Southport on the Bay Unit: 1 Lot: 28 Block: Address/General Location of Subject Property: • 206 San Mateo Drive Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: PUD-Single Family Residental BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS.GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. Page2of7 6/3/2014 Co? er county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS LDC Section 5.03.06 Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following information is intended to guide the applicant through the application and public hearing process for a Dock Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment Petition. Prior to submitting the Dock Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment Petition application, the applicant shall attend a pre-application meeting to determine if a dock facility extension or boathouse establishment is available and to discuss the location, length/protrusion, and configuration of the proposed boat dock facility.The pre-application fee is $500.00 and will be credited toward application fee upon submittal. If the application is not submitted within 9 months of the pre-application meeting the pre-app fee will be forfeited and will not be credited toward the application fee. In order for the application to be processed,all accompanying materials (see attached submittal checklist) shall be completed and submitted with sheapplication. plusThe $925 00 for required l Dock egal Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment $1,500.00, advertising. After submission of the completed application packet, accompanied with the required fees,the applicant will receive a response notifying that the petition is being processed. Accompanying that response will be a receipt for the payment and the tracking number (i.e., BDE- PL20120000000) assigned to the petition. This petition tracking number should be noted on all future correspondence regarding the petition. Pursuant to the LDC and the Administrative Code, saland Zoning Departure twill sall completed within the required time frames. The Planning at the cost of the applicant, legal notification to surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the subject property and newspaper advertisement (required 15 days prior to the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing date). The applicant will be notified by email of the hearing date and will receive a copy of the Staff Report. It is recommended, but not required,that the applicant or the agent attend the Hearing Examiner hearing. Please contact the Growth Management Division at 252-2400 for further assistance completing this application. Pagelof7 6/3/2014 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N PUD/BD-04-AR-5239 04-03 Single Family Residence 5 PUD Single Family Residence E Waterway/PUD Little Hickory Bay W San Mateo DR/ROW/PUD Single Family Residence DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project(indicate extent of work,new dock,replacement,addition to existing facility,any other pertinent information): Remove existing(204)SQ.FT.dock,(BD-04-AR-52390)and request a 42 foot extension beyond the maximum 20 feet to be able to accommodate 1 boat lift for 26'vessel and 1 lift for PWC/Paddle crafts.Total over water structure is(668)SOFT.Dock to be in same location. (See Drawings). SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 860 ft. Measurement from❑plat ❑survey ❑visual estimate ❑ other(specify) 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 97.58 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 39.3U33.7R ft. Required: 15 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 62.7 ft. 5. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 25 ft. 2. ft. 3. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: Docks at SOUTHPORT on the BAY:Lot 24 is 68.92',Lot 25 is 63.13',Lot 26 is 62',Lot 27 is 50',Lot 29 is 80'and Lot 30 is 64' 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size,the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 024 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge,has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑Yes❑No If yes,please provide copies. 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 7 Cotler County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE _ GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. in order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate;typical,single-family use should be no more than two slips;typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks,additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length,type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide(MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel(s)described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than V2 a5 percent width e width hn dock waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the Y facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Page 4 of 7 6/3/2014 Mike Scott's Dock Facility Extension Primary Criteria 1. The upland property is a single-family residential zoned lot that per the LDC is allowed two boat slips. Proposed dock consists of 1 boat slip and 1 decked lift for kayak/canoe which is appropriate for single-family dwelling. We are requesting a 42.7-foot extension from the allowed 20-foot protrusion. 2. This area of Little Hickory Bay is extremely shallow and the existing water depths are insufficient to moor a motorized vessel within their riparian rights without protruding greater than the allowed 20-feet into the waterway. Water depth too shallow for mooring at mean low tide as shown in cross-sectional dock drawing, the average water depth at mean high tide is 6 feet. 3. Proposed dock facility does not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel, thus no adverse impact on navigation is expected.The width of the waterway, measured from MHW to MHW, is approximately 860-feet and the proposed dock and lifts will protrude 62.7-feet from the property line and 53.1-feet from the MHW line. The proposed dock and lifts have been designed not to impede navigation and is — congruent with the other existing docks along this shoreline. 4. Proposed dock facility protrudes a total of 62.7 from shoreline,the overall protrusion is approximately 7.5%of 860'width of waterway,therefore doesn't protrude more than 25%as shown on site plan survey. Dock facility maintains more than 50% of the navigable waterway open. 5. Proposed dock facility location nor design interferes with neighboring docks as shown in county appraiser's aerial view and in fact proposed dock will be consistent with existing docks along the shoreline. Signed letters from the neighbors on each side of the proposed dock area have been included for review. Coder County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 SECONDARY CRITERIA l 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject k property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed ock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may n type of shoreline reinforcement,shoreline configuration,mangrove growth,or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions.(The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities,whether or not the length of the vessels or linear v vessels in comb nation, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject ect property' (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would(The facility should not have anmajor waterfront on the view neighboring waterfront property owners of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200.00 3 feet omthe proposed posed dock demonstrated�lity (If seagrass beds are present,compliance with LDC subsea o 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) Page 5 of 7 6/3/2014 Secondary Criteria 1. The proposed dock facility has no existing seawall, mangrove growth along shoreline, plus shallow water depths justifies proposed extension of dock into deeper water. 2. Proposed dock facility allows reasonable and safe access to vessels without excessive deck area not directly related to maintenance functions, storage of kayaks/canoes and accessories as shown in site plan survey. If storage area and lift were reversed kayaks/canoes would create insufficient area to board vessel safely. 3. Length of vessel is 25' and is less than 50% of property's linear waterfront footage of 97.58' as shown in site plan survey. 4. Proposed dock facility will not have a major impact on waterfront view of neighboring property owners and will be consistent with existing docks along shoreline as shown in county appraiser's aerial view. 5. To our knowledge no sea grass beds are located near proposed dock facility as shown in results of submerged resource survey conducted by Turrell, Hall &Associates and provided for review. 6. Proposed dock facility consists of 1 boat slip and 1 decked lift for kayak/canoe,thus does not require Manatee Protection Plan as stated in LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11 or N/A. Aug 031502:39p Greg Orick Marine 2393012238 p.1 COIL PL 201500010 24 REV 1 COLLIERCOUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGENIENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.coilierkov.net (239)252--240 FAX (239)252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressina@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address.Farm must be i•ned b Add,- sin• •ersonnel •dor to •re-a••lication meetin• •lease allow 3 da s for •rocessin.. Not all items will apply to every project. items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE(Indicate type below,complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL(Blasting Permit) 0 SDP(Site Development Plan) BD(Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ Camival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI(Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU(Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP(Excavation Permit) ❑ SIP'(Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat ❑ SNR(Street Name Change) [] LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC(Street Name Change-Unplatted) ❑ PNC(Project Name Change) ❑ TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ P (Plans&Plat ❑ VA(Variance) rat Review) ❑ VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PS retirninary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRSFP(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone❑ RZ(Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description may be attached) SOUTHPORT ON THE BAY UNIT ONE LOT 28 S06,T 48S, R 25E FOLIO{Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach to,or associate with,legal description if more than one) 74435003103 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(as applicable,if already assigned) 246 SAN MATED DRIVE BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of projectlsite in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME(if applicable) • PROPOSED STREET NAMES(if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER(for existingprojects/sites only) SDP or AR or P L# Aug 0315 02:40p Greg Orick Marine 2393012238 p.2 Goer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH IVIANAGEIVIENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA. 34104 . www.cclliergou.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 Project or development names proposed for,or already appearing in,condominium documents(if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: p Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Mike Scott Phone: 239-949-5588 Email/Fax: info @orickmarine.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE 71/4135003/(13 ONLY Folio Number Y Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number 81/ Approved by: 1, �rtr _ fG Date: Updated by: Date: iF Oi DER THAN 6 MONTHS,HS, ti O M MUST Bw- UPDATED OR N=W FORM SUBMITTED October 2,2015 To Whom It May Concern, I, Katherine A.Scott,beneficiary of the Katherine A.Scott Trust,and owner of the property located at 206 San Mateo Dr.,Bonita Springs, FL,hereby acknowledges and Michael Scott has permission to do all permits and licenses required to facilitate the building of a new dock also located on San Mateo. 1111,�� 401 / AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL,aot Cy-y71 t I r`s' (print name),as (title,if applicable)of (company,If a licable),swear or affirm under oath,that I am the(choose one)ownerEapplicantncontract purchaserriand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s)requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches,data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize b'rr; Ir G Llfnnr, be.cimrlr.7 -7/ - to act as our/my representative in any matters regafding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation,then it is usually executed by the corp.pres.or v.pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company(LLC.)or Limited Company(LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's`Managing Member.' • If the applicant is a partnership,then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the 'general partner'of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust,then they must include the trustee's name and the words as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury,I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. - 'Signature Date • STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER • The foregoing instrument was sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me on 14211/45"(date)by /F (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to men or who has produced (type of identification)as identification. STAMP/SEAL Signature of Notary Public 1 �.s""r"" NOW UMW a�' NoulrY P9N*•Spate W%VA 4 I• ;"•°MY Comm Expires Jun 29.Y011 Commialon*EE 114085 ,.,t " Bonded Through Notional tbhry Ape, CP108-COA-00115\155 REV 3/24/14 http://www.collierappraiser.com/Main Search/RecordDetail.html?Fol... Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary PL 2015 0 0 010 2.4 REV Parcel No. 74435003103 Site Adr. 206 SAN MATEO DR Name/Address KATHERINE A SCOTT REV TRUST 10836 CRYSTAL RIDGE CT City ORLAND PARK State IL Zip 60467 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A06 636400 283A06 6 48 25 0.24 Legal SOUTHPORT ON THE BAY UNIT ONE LOT 28 Millage Area 0 3 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 636400 - SOUTHPORT ON THE BAY UNIT ONE School Other Total Use Code 0 1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 5.58 5.6697 11.2497 Latest Sales History 2014 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book-Page Amount Land Value $ 885,464 03/06/15 5127-1094 $2,400,000 (c) Improved Value $ 631,753 08/21/98 2453-546 $ 317,000 01/01/91 1588-1477 $ 245,000 (_> Market Value $ 1,517,217 09/01/89 1469-556 $2,714,200 > Save our Home $ 72,087 (_> Assessed Value $ 1,445,130 (-) Homestead $ 25,000 (_) School Taxable Value $ 1,420,130 (-) Additional Homestead $ 25,000 (=) Taxable Value $ 1,395,130 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll d/Zn/•)m c 1.4A Ali/ etails http://www.collierappraiser.com/Main Search/RecordDetaii.html?Fol... . . . / . ( Print New Search Tax Bills Change of Address T `roperty Summary Property Detail 1 Aerial Sketches Trim Notices Parcel No. 74435003103 Site Adr. 206 SAN MATEO DR : t e_ \ 1 i , _ .y.--- a S I, t ' { �- - - , , r _ ,� e- - - .ter_ .£ Collier County Property Appraiser Year: 2015 Land -arcel: 7443500310_- Open a CIS Window with More Features. )f 1 4/30/2015 7.55 AM Collier County Property Appraiser HOVE I anaoeuenco. i FE.EL]BACK}y HELP '`{-:f =-- X X X yi} • .' °.. . l... W^' ! - ma .�. - " ' ;• ' i:4.(.w, Gam- 2,5�A: y- It i74-..r'--�-6. ply *•O Si. fi,y. a yd's r � _ - [5 f-F 1 s. .041(.., .,..-,,-.-.-,-.411 F.$71- A yue �.• - 1... Y j- - _ !� �t r �, .. w i t s n V. -_�•., _. -_--- x .. 1 =i .._ 6,.,T At a i s'4 P " --s+.t-v _ 4. - rte' r 4 •--•2 sty S .a"`}-_• 7i07- :7 -yam {ff — ilfr . . . .,..., A 'r 3w 11 Q _ Zoom In Zoom Out identify . Measure Full County View Previous Zoom To Clear Map Overview View Selected Graphics Aerial Year: Sales Year: _ X X X X Wednesday,August 12,2015 To the Owners of 204 San Mateo Dr.: We,the Owners of 206 San Mateo Dr.,would like to seek your consent to allow a dock and boat lifts to be constructed beyond the 20 foot county limitation line. The proposed dock and boat lift will not infringe upon of the 15'side yard setback adjacent to your property. Attached to this letter is a proposed drawing,based off of a recent survey that shows the approximate placement of the dock and boat lifts in question. Yours faithfully, Michael&Katherine Scott Owners of 206 San Mateo Rd. We,the Owners of 204 San Mateo Dr.,have no objection whatsoever to the proposed drawing referenced and consent to the placement of the dock and boat lift. Yours faithfully, �1 Date: Bryan''tt Owner of 204 San Mateo Dr. pcA.}uL.. . Date: v /" 7 Sally Putt Owner of 204 San Mateo Dr. Page 1 of 2 PN/L or th -383- Turbidity Curtain * ' _.--16'-'-------� ~ _t'I! CT „u yfa'din p y i I I! _ t r 12 111100. i I 1 I t v58 ?r i Boat Lift 14', 16 1rD` u s7 i , , --►,_4'3 za "tC 7uhldl y Curtain d South -P/L 7000b2'- .L' �'+-_. __t- 24'3"�_- --',A 62'2'. dUft r s �� I q i ■ } Railing _ _ 33.- r1 I 1 25 t_ MMVYL ■ Exi6fm 4 c g bra Be r. 1 - t1' w t i f t ',- FfF9hng Mangru.e l3aak. i iI 1 � Property- r Line Page2of2 r. GREG ORICK MARINE Name: Mike Scott " CONSTRUCTION, INC. Address: 206 San Mateo Dr A w Bonita Springs,FL 34134 %�(� r (239) 949-5588 Date: 8/3/2015 s Monday,August 3,2015 To the Owners 0208 San Mateo Dr.: We,the Owners of 206 San Mateo Dr.,would like to seek your consent to allow a dock and boat lifts to be constructed beyond the 20 foot county limitation line.The proposed dock and boat lift will not infringe upon of the 15'side yard setback adjacent to your property.Attached to this letter is a proposed drawing,based off of a recent survey that shows the approximate placement of the dock and boat lifts in question. Yours faithfully, Michael&Katherine Scott Owners of 206 San Mateo Rd. We,the Owners of 208 San Mateo Dr.,have no objection whatsoever to the proposed drawing referenced and consent to the placement of the dock and boat lift. Yours faithfully, S * J es Date:A Fountain < / Owner of 208 San Mateo Dr. Date: 44./45 XD15 Gwen A Fountain Owner of 208 San Mateo Dr. Page 1of2 d ^\� \ A Q t jdd � : m 2 r /%-i ^ \� W tiki k 0 «� \ \ � ! C © ~ } =2 I:1; 0 n ! , ^}\i � ° (» $ * y g 2 � \ \ ■ , § ° } » d» -- 2 § , \_ --- [ < . 0 2 - / ~ in - _/ _ \\ p . \:-----x. x ---- - ------�-_ c tF: - � 2. . , ,/ ! LtI : f 1 \ . < ) t , ! . \ ,2- 2. _ r g 4 2 P. 1 - \ . t , . . } --� a tee ® ` 1 �� ^ ` ` ■ y / { . \ I I ' \ \ 4/ ?ƒ ' f 7 a \ ,/2 & \ \ � . , /41 ? « | » . » � 4^° m --G—-x . . . . . - .. . r y w � _� ------ / < � s. . \ _ \ />& § ,7 jr r\ ƒ : . E(\ %f /I { . . . 2 ; \ { -- % / , r. tu IV E go I I---IIII---IIII- ,i ! -- IIII ma -III— I — I, -I Ii_ i 1 = 1 = i - 1 67r n 0 -I III= =I'I.-1I!I N °Z m 3.1 I -1 I - I— . to C PJ =7-1111=1111 I'll 1, 1;I F fM l! I= I— - b .1� ,.I ,_ toil Tr _ tl143 >1 =111-I I I I=111 �-I I L ®--� - t • - 31 =-1111-1111—=1.itm-=- r mill El 18. i d a z I— I1=1 gym— x o = F4 fal - I.� ;!a y 11 --- � N V... ! 1JIi1i! W 1 ota m —VMS nil W 7Q o I=I =�. �_ ag W I 4. , 4. II l i i s _ Z al _ s MI r 11==1 11=i il tr _ _ = 1 i= 'I - -_ 9b -III _ VN -a— xfa II I � F I !ji �IAh ! pap yrI 1 W:;F VI III 11—{ i°l ° 116 l` 111111 IIII s a � _ Q 0 GI r z M O C o r- oC'� z � co _ CWi Milmingir 7 m pa 0 CD o r ? _ �ti 0 cu �E cn cn �_ ap 0 W p = _ n CD In ! ! a o I j- i Mil ... A� _ `;- m t'l ml WaE �-+ - ; Ott eD rp W _ = t 2 _ X 0 M� _ � - ca ru - `r _ YY -f. i J E G r = c SAN MA TED DRIVE m rc 6D' R.0.W. co zA M m \` D Zip ��� _„ �� c — —<*z o _ — >zo °opi M uu A 'o +VP I � � m-- u o p2 En m w r� ` • am rn M Dz - r m2 r- 0 pp OG) 52 2 M�f 2 m v 2 r .Qi .�.v�.� I–" 7[ml .tit tiv :<1<m ND v w °gym o II II II II If _{ +° o' CA CO. z z O ?i -0 -tl �l w—♦I -Ti F D Z z ni 1 D m r O O N v �N ��> to V I- 1- r > c c 4 o IJ u co Al n O - ZZ co �I zz a z r � 1z � F C NN '\ tit` f0 0 mNAl r O u -, >z 0 oD O vm O oo z �� o< N N m &' CO M Xl m rn (off� m =Z Z z N c Z G7 OD 6 r..1.N v o o z 2 39 m b J p m T °\ c co D M ; CO m 01 CP f O Z z i- -- _ / '�.xf - 0. r m [n .s �, m 14 CA 40r i lifhz.N.' ' . o o o ° {C • O I '�Y• Is XI x o: o ml m _�o Tpx as ow >� m =, g�,6� ,y m m� g owoo ~ � g 7 R. oHw° Cm ----/ �o 'm ( v d sea x�cpo�,4° C] o m a� m ( z co rn xR aFw9x >v n1 I m 6. J• b D \- O g � 6 ��� O wlC:<.< y o IF Co (`C a e o ° 1t� ° p n o c n in 1 II'— N w tv I?7 ea o`V i. i n r M+ m o o~c°� s o m N fro° m °m p 0-, N ?Ft" m J J rn N A w N r` N N 2D mN yyD {{ { .'SOZ yDy m1m r m VNZm Co Z gO m s R >m 79 c 0 0 b E CD7 C ZOC cncC m C °r m co O,.- y m A m Z '1 O ZNZO yCSO y • Z> r O N � Z Rf to Z O C �1 I O jn DcOii II o p 9 p O I aCAz oA pzp Cm v 1 N 20> 00 t�'1 = V -0 y A v I+i{ A< C mA mI N Z C I-IA+I �mm m> NN ? ? m m A ON rn AA`` CA u� , Pm g 2 <m Nay II; yZ O O O Z DMZ j ={ TC „ INn1 220 2011 A f O rmn '� ° N aON tz z Z w r In ?p° 0Z Oy m 3.. ; _ C) ;�VQ LAS N r1',1 0 XIT Z A- N0 N m Z A ? m~ Vl w z_ Z ZO,- mC Z z Z N y1A� rn ZZ OZ O.-I m DN $mR m p O r, m• D �m mo m6 mmP Z> r m m p C� DO TS O N N Cr_, (NT Np p II f 71 L� N rl+ O$g rZ m R I co I b >CY fl O (p� 0� RC C N' 71 w n N 80z° ;; C xi 2 m mg ym 1<5 my 0mm O m m M2 to A tn A y m-a II O M -Imtn N5O > F° 5 m 0*rI O r Z 4'm 0-m 0 o m0> D a z dYL xi z ~~z N0 O M mNA mZ 2 K D NOm O> m x OCD o AC Ec0 8y �� i ` r,,En N j2N < -�jRI TA RI co ...,Q)• O YEA DA zmm m - —im 0mN N ,.. m Ot ANN N�N n� �O dm ym z In„m 20 m vm, 4.5 ro wm0 D 20Orp N> o co r-I* m y1'�l N o co -tp> v> F Oa O▪ p O °z co Ro z 0 D D • i gm 1 w q ■ y• Su■ ° ccnO PI;z Lit 0 a y o -4 11 orrIN 1;2 a m> �� o mAN 4-, A' 0°o Oy. 0mC PS . ip ' M S.f a J N.oO m n•q Nzpa O 00 OVA > 2� \Eta'n4S e ? / m c°amyC 1-y0 m fax °°” z�zZa t" mmz ORrt lc 8 Rr• .-.n pO MI 0p Z'a Z tl n *7k00° o rn er• o..° °1�>,�p*. oNO R N R • m x >�m a@ °nom.. w • 8 1 c Ig m N co O O N • O tt a•e p w G a G ,° ) d d1 i * ' FN0 A a w° ) - �' atz - 5-- ,, N m U - W .. r l SCOTT DOCK 206 SAN MATEO DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34134 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY APRIL 14,2015 PREPARED BY; r= '-if TURRELL,HALL&ASSOCIATES,INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE,STE B NAPLES,FL 34104 5corr DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY APRIL 14,2015 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Scott Dock and residence is located at 206 San Mateo Drive, identified by Parcel Number 74435003103. The property is located along the west side of Little Hickory Bay, which is also bound to the north and south by a single-family residence, and bound to the west by San Mateo Drive. The property is located in Section 06, Township 48 South, and Range 25 East. The upland portion of the property is a single-family residence. Turrell, Hall & Associates was contracted to provide environmental permitting services and one aspect is the associated Submerged Resource Survey (SRS). This survey will provide planning and review assistance to both owners and agency reviewers in regards to proposed project. The proposed project consists of constructing a single-family dock within Little Hickory Bay. The SRS survey was conducted on April 6, 2015. Light southeast winds, mostly clear skies, and an outgoing tide resulted in visible access to the entire project area. Surface water conditions on this day were calm which also helped to provide fair environmental conditions for the survey. The water temperature was 76°F. Low tide occurred at 7:37 A.M(0.2')and high tide occurred at 1:16 P.M(2.1')on the date of the survey. 2.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of the submerged resource survey was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within the limits of the proposed project. The survey provided onsite environmental information to help determine if the proposed project would impact any existing submerged resources and if so would assist in reconfiguring the proposed dock in order to minimize any impacts. The general scope of work performed at the site is summarized below. • Turrell,Hall &Associates personnel conducted a site visit and I snorkeled these transects within the proposed project basin and verified the location of any submerged resources. • Turrell, Hall &Associates personnel identified submerged resources at the site, estimated the % of coverage, and delineated the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed. * Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel delineated limits via a handheld GPS (Gamin Model 76csx). Page 1 of 3 SCOTT DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY APRIL 14,2015 3.0 METHODOLOGY Turrell, Hall &Associates biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock installation. The components for this survey included: • Review of aerial photography of survey area • Establish survey transects lines overlaid onto aerials • Physically swim transects, GPS locate limits of submerged resources, and determine approximate percent of coverage •Document and photograph all findings The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transects spaced approximately 10-feet apart as shown on the attached exhibit. The neighboring properties have existing docks which provided easily identifiable reference markers, such as dock piles which assisted in locating transects and keeping them consistent throughout most of the survey area. One biologist walked/swam these transects using snorkel equipment where needed within the surveyed area. The other individual assisted with compiling notes and documenting findings on aerials. Located submerged resources were photographed, the approximate percent of coverage was quantified, and the location was delineated on an aerial photo as well as confirmed via handheld GPS (Garmin Model 72H). The biologists used a half meter square quadrant further broken into sections by cordage to make coverage estimates easier. 4.0 RESULTS The substrate found within the surveyed area included two distinct classifications; silt sand with shell debris and just silt/muck material. These substrates were found scattered throughout the surveyed area. There was also scattered small oyster clusters and shell debris along the property shoreline. The shoreline consisted of red mangroves with scattered rip-rap both of which provide habitat for numerous fish, crabs, and barnacles, growing on and around the mangrove roots. The majority of the survey area exhibited a silt/sand bottom that was devoid of any aquatic vegetation growth or any types of submerged resources. The lack of any submerged resources is most likely due to the overall water quality within Little Hickory Bay as well as the water clarity not allowing much sunlight penetration. This was most evident in the deeper water depths. Page 2 of 3 SCOTF DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY APRIL 14,2015 Various filamentous algae and macro algae were observed and documented growing along the bottom sediments throughout the survey area. Also observed were numerous fish species during the survey and a list of these species has been prepared and is provided below as Table 1. Table 1 —Observed Fish Species Common Name ; cenfic Name mangrove snapper I Lutjan.:'s gri.:iez s'eepshead I Ar chosarrig s pr"oba oceph'ius striped mullet {iI Mir=ii cephalus snook Ce troi pus unV ecimalis { 111 jack cre aile Camr x hippos 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The submerged resource survey at the site yielded few findings. Barnacles were observed growing on the mangrove roots and existing dock piles. The subject property shoreline consists of mangroves which provide natural cover. This mangrove area was where all the observed fish species were located including: Gray Snapper (Lu/anus griseus), Sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus), Stripped Mullet (Mugil cephalus), and a few Common Snooks(Centropomus undecimalis). Negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected with the proposed docking facility installation. Page 3 of 3 • �/ stOVDU xouyQo1 sW-a3HHl iSBZSt13 J.V1$-JlWN3dV33F3S1OVMS1181 w04Z9/1d Vy A� m m �m Pil E12-.. Cn O�°r V tir 1. ol 1�9 c 21 12 I u .f o0 w DI���E 1 �►}`INNINTio:, 7 (--1,7":„,_ , 1111 8 )107 _.- J Ili flfl vg�aeWaaa }7 .. D(10 ?i 5V al al 73 m If: 0 *z z-0 zo 0 a� SA 11 cw v-a v r'w /...o."' • M 0 Z O a \ D n� � • Q__. - - I 1,,f\ © C O 9 V m m o m _K O mm ° 03� —0 "< m X --7--- A,74-.-4: 1. It.:7-45 0 . • . -.,...t. 0 ''', .'-':-.,.1_,• --., V" -- .,--; f, : _, - .... ie..= .,.e.e,.. -,..---...... , eito...„ _} i s ..„.., . ,. - 4. 0 P------;z- - .-!'--, 1/4 - ' r < ---'- . . J.,....e..4 / 1.; 41 C r-s= -WI j -. 4 o „qt. - I., : _ q I 1..._....... am at e Z 1 .�f(..,..„1 €_ _ , , .► A- t z > - F It 41*5 CO r ;t' at f _ 4 --••-•_\•�p,•• F. -- _. .... Sl07JON4 a3mfawar araoatl ens am sair33-.unksdLL33M5.4VolSNC 11m lizstrd M' l . y _ , ..,,t4-#0 rkt w 311 13N a+ �Oi �" E c �Y,b ti itir-fl N N aC fig- �+ �" f` x_. . _ D, - M ft . ✓ s n:_ a - r a't r F y 7 1 K all __ ! „...71 unl - ''! may +f Q - �'°��,,.0 ri71 C) ..„...,.. ...........................CO "`.11r,C -+.,� , ..U.7 0 V � 112111 r- 'fl 1+ i - - -+"- _ 2 y �.,� el 2 hi _ � Q _ :, _.,..., PB 15 :pG-5z ,.:,-;_,,,--- :,-__.. ,---, ; , _,..________-- _.....„--, _ .._, _ ., ....._\-„........___...--, \'''. \• \ :-...i:-- ,- - g ... .._,... :!lig. i : , .... `..- . ■ ''..5. -4'. ■,.., Zi. ..:.. .,.,":"K /' ,5.!;1444. 11- , .. .4..t ==s . ,.:;',•. . ';F i ''-•I - f..,(.'''''g -,... 4''''.::.-, \,- ;.--- ,... r, . . 4.- ..- ..,.7 , -, g•-• . . _ ..-i- laP;!• :-_,f :: ::!--i... z= :4,44:___",tai-4-4.,.. ._.2-,_I,'' -- i . ,, .. .. - az:_-.- ,,..9,. t- . .: AB;:: -.-1 : - fe..1 \,-, .;,-,:•11: -,.. ;.----:.,r:al :-/- - ",71 - ..-= . ,,,,....,..---:-..,, ',--,.-„ 1`." - ;::,.:,------g • ;----' !,-.::-.-47. ------1 2' '. ''' '''-. ''-'"I f-. ' -' % 5."''''...- '...,..." ... ■- .■ I.-. . 1 Si! . ., ",.r ', .1 . 2 t z- '-„f-----•' _ -. . - ,_-.. ----23-,---` -r- '-' -- '-, 4,: . -.'•• _ ; R - - N - • . - 't , ,,, 2 ... ,_,.. 8 -. ------.-: -- rd s z's:- ' -- / (\() - rg, ,.- . ......:... .1,-•Tii•k----.''''..- '- '''''', 'r.y. : N • ,--..- 4.4.':5P ._ . , I i 1 2C.1 1:::. - • - •- § Q ' -...,, . . -:=•--"=.,; l' --I - - .._ , 2 4 i . ;; - - A f i : i ■ - ki-`I.-, 0 0 -,-.... iR 5 ..--..1—,,1..•,' ; -',,-,_ - ='7 k-7 -e1-1 xas,.... . ---••■.....- ,iie:-l. 2-rN 0 r.i ra r+,iJ i‘.0.10161-1. .111U/1.11 JEALLE-ILIN 206 San Mateo Drive Folio ID#74435003103 S 06/T48S1 R25,Collier County,FL L INTRODUCTION Collier County Environmental star are currently reviewing an application for a docking facility located at 206 San Mateo Drive,submitted by Orick Marine. The County's review determined that the existing 20-foot Conservation Easement area along the property shoreline has been impacted with fill and non-native landscape plantings. This work within the easement area was not authorized therefore Collier County staff are requiring that the Conservation Easement area be restored to natural conditions by removing fill and planting the area with native shrubs and groundcover. The property is identified on the property appraiser's website as 74435003103, which is approximately 024 acre lot situated within Section 06,Township 48 South, and Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida, This document outlines the restoration plan for the onsite Conservation Easement area. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS: HABITAT&SOIL DESCRIPTIONS The subject site consists of 0.24 acre dedicated to a single-family residential dwelling with a 20-foot wide (0.05 acre) conservation easement area along the shoreline. The conservation easement area was impacted with the placement of fill material and landscaped plantings. The existing plantings within the easement area consist of a ficus hedge (Ficus benjamina), cordgrass (Spartina spp), and scaevola (Scaevola plumieri). The groundcover within this area consists of St. Augustine grass (Stenotaphrurn secundatum). The conservation easement area will be restored as required by Collier County Environmental Staff. Existing soil is fill placed on the property at the time the residence was constructed. Much of this fill will be removed from the easement area as part of this restoration plan. III. PROPOSED PLANTINGS/RESTORATION The owner is proposing to restore the conservation easement area(0.05 acres)by removing the fill that was placed there dining the construction of the house and creating a consistent slope being approximately 8:1,from the remaining upland fill area to the existing natural shoreline elevation. This will allow for a very gradual slope and once the fill is removed the proposed plantings outlined below will be installed throughout the easement area. I The proposed plantings shall include a minimum of 11 midstory trees on 20' centers consisting of red mangroves and buttonwood trees,which will be placed higher up on the slope to ensure their survival. The groundcover will consist of 128 plants on 3'centers including leather fern,sea oxeye, and bay cedar which will be located higher up on the slope to help ensure their survival. All species listed should be utilized in even amounts if possible,but exact species numbers could be based on supply availability. Planting specifics are outlined below. Midstory plants: Number of Trees=11 Red Mangrove(Rhyzophora mangle) 6 Buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus) 5 All midstory plantings will be installed on 20ft.centers with a minimum 1-3 gallon pot containers. Groundcover plants: Number of Plants=128 Sea Oxeye(Borrichia frutescens) 78 Bay Cedar(Suriana maritima) 25 Leather Fern(Acrostichum aureum) 25 All groundcover plantings will be installed on 3f1. centers with a minimum I gallon pot containers. Please see attached exhibits for approximate layout of the proposed planting area. Irrigation maybe required for the top half of the easement area due to the distance from the ground water table to help ensure the plantings survival. For the lower half of the easement no irrigation is proposed due to the final elevations of this portion of the conservation easement being connected to the tidal water table which will keep the plantings hydrated naturally. IV. CREDENTIALS JeffRogers Project Manager for T urrell,Hall&Associates since 2005 B.S.Degree in Environmental Science,Rollins College Sustainable Development Course-Galapagos Islands,Equador Completed Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Wetland Delineation Training Course-2006 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Environmental Resource Permit Course-2006 Completed a FAEP Plant ID Class with Dr.Hall from the University of Florida- __ 2006 Primary career focus:Permit Compliance Mitigation and Monitoring 2 li, ),- C T A ,n 2 D v t �CL3pD m r} oa �.ti/e Ls-WOE' a F M a m A= O apepR° mom,. O jilt ■ D— '8 t..1 O co my ZZ'1 Z O!n Z i0 D y m Oyu �m 'I *Z Zz �p 0, NI m� Zo • 1 n� -a 0) ZD cn. r ow 0m �j OM `'xi n"� t r 0 I zg m D ,..,----7.--------"---5 __. co 1 0 Z Z . m D I �n-� m m H —°i i t tit 0 $ l 'LL A /4 5 . Z a Yg!F A 'Sat . t/ -+' 1,. Z II 4 T C k , ell 0 N 4.4 m • • a , �. Illi r s �' - _ w' O $° H -r: �} - v . 0§ - wa C _ - b N i be. ° = m . 1 AL , ' / dill° . illt - � �,'.. 0 • >N f Fob M 1.---' 11111e ' X_ s g - ' .€ # Z Z _ 40.\ ./ , _ . > . , - - \- . D _s rn 0 zs mcn � D >< = D � m n No5`z Z D i r —I s . 0 a � ., o a , O p:awN F N ii : v 1 - � 03 L ! '4 (-4 -.b.'," A Z 1• Ill m ■ a m y L �1 w y gDN.0 0 z PP= O 73 z d m Z m -, co — y tiJ xs o n ca 0178' M F.W i i 0 N NOR • A'7 ' / 4::,.. O ..-1.O f m • T ` —' k V, /\\,,,_________ . zi. %,1‘. ,/ • \ - >t* 1 17. li . -0 L iii". v.._, • ,., _, / , z K 9 cn D N c z p v° m / 2 17 2 m C 0 W / �.t/772 O _ _ ii' X1 0 M PO O N m' Z 2� Q co 0 0 m Z _PEa o � v O x 7 .m N m og z o o o o /p o /N.PN:`. Q X o o o N o z - o n r ro r Z 4 m [}ij�] o 6,-ipX — �l r��FYi Z m YI Yf Ul Ill \ R �l i K., I :: '' I hE XI o ff R I� K D. A / Z c7 % y I r O XI n 0E c,11 O n .sip � � �x z m ti I� o g -. _„.,,,_,,..._--_-..\ '0 it; N O9 j CONSERVATION — T— ` _ , — _ _ i_ ) EASEMENT = i/ i O Cn M r' Cn W 4 m D _ c 9Z o p D _ v o 0 0 c) run z 0 0 o • _ m 1b1 m 0 � w ' '. w z p •m 9,00 . • n _4_.---_• _ 2 ' AM. 111111 ....* to il 2 1 II 4 i i s`4 _ � CONSERVAT{ON y_ "' • EASEMENT 14A » Friday,February 19,2016 )) NAPLES DAILY NEWS PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 10th, 2016, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples FL 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. BD-PL20150001024— Mike Scott requests a 42.7-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of approximately 62.7 feet, to accommodate the replacement of an existing boat dock facility with a new dock facility with one boat lift for the benefit of Lot 28, Southport on the Bay, Unit One, also described as 206 San Mateo Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. LEE COUNTY (CR.865) � B�ONIT A BEACH ROAD PROJECT LELY BEAOT ILIrnE LOCATION CONDO �:L-i • HICKORY BAY LELY ( BONITA SHORES BAREFOOT �5 BEACH Ili AUDUBON $o COUNTRY/ CLUB g LEE CO. y` AUDUBON oCOUNTRY S CLU 8 BAY FORET 9 *HEE THE TWO WATERCLADES RETREAT PLA2A All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need tc ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division located at 3335 Tamiamr Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida 448 EXHIBIT No.937410 February 19 2016 a 14>nt 3/1O/16