LDR Subcommittee Minutes 02/01/2016 February 1, 2016
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SUBCOMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, February 1, 2016
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory
Committee —Land Development Review Subcommittee in and for the County of Collier,
having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3:00 PM in a REGULAR
SESSION at the Growth Management Division Building, Room 609/610 2800 N.
Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL with the following persons present:
Blair Foley
Robert Mulhere (Excused)
Clay Brooker
ALSO PRESENT: Stephen Lenberger, Sr. Environmental Specialist
Caroline Cilek, LDC Manager
Jeremy Frantz, Sr. Planner
Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner
Ray Bellows, Planning Manager
John Kelly, Planner
1
February 1, 2016
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording
from the Collier County Growth Management Division —Planning and Regulation building—Contact
Mr. Evy Ybaceta at 239-252-2400.
1. Call to order
Mr. Brooker called the meeting to order at 3:03pm and a quorum was established.
2. Approve agenda
Mr. Foley moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Brooker. Carried unanimously 2—0.
3. November 12, 2015 meeting minutes correction
Staff reported the County Attorney's Office requested Form 8B filed by Mr. Espinar be attached to
the minutes.
Mr. Foley moved to approve the November 12, 2015 corrected minutes. Second by Mr. Brooker.
Carried unanimously 2—0.
4. Review Amendments
Staff reported Subcommittee Member Robert Mulhere was not present but submitted an email dated
January 28, 2016 which stated he had reviewed the proposed amendments and did not have any
comments noting they were minor and sensible in nature.
a. LDC Sections 2.03.03 and others—Correcting Cross-References , Conflicts and Scrivener's
Errors
LDC Sections: 1.08.02 Definitions, 2.03.03 Commercial Zoning Districts,2.03.06 Planned Unit
Development Districts, 2.03.08 Rural Fringe Zoning Districts, 3.05.10 Littoral
Shelf Planting Area(LSPA), 4.06.02 Buffer Requirements, 4.06.05 General
Landscape Requirements and 5.06.00 Sign Standards and Regulations By Land
Use Classification
Staff reported the proposed amendment is to correct scrivener errors, incorrect cross-references,
remove a duplicate permitted use in C-5 Zoning District, and address a missing cross-reference.
Mr. Foley moved to recommend the proposed amendment be approved the proposed
amendment as presented. Second by Mr. Brooker. Carried unanimously 2- 0.
b. LDC Sections 3.02.10 and 5.03.06—Updating NGVD/NAVD Submittal Requirements
LDC Sections: 3.02.10 Standards for Subdivision Plats, 5.03.06 Dock Facilities
Staff reported the change is to replace outdated references to the National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929 (NGVD) with references to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988
(NAVD) in the above referenced sections. The change proposes to eliminate the requirement to
provide both NAVD and NGVD for finished elevations and to use NAVD only given Federal
Agencies and the County's Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance requires floor elevations using
the NAVD standard. This would eliminate confusion as the LDC currently requires finished
elevations on final plats to demonstrate both NAVD and NGVD.
2
February 1, 2016
Mr. Foley moved to recommend for the Development Services Advisory Committee to
recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment as
presented. Second by Mr. Brooker. Carried unanimously 2- 0.
c. LDC Sections 3.05.07—Identification of Preserves (this item was heard before item 4.a)
Staff reported the proposed change is to clarify that preserves are to be identified at the time of
the first development order that requires the approval of a site plan. They noted the requirement
to identify the location of preserves "at the time of first development order" is intended to apply
to the first development order that requires approval of a site plan (including a conceptual site
plan) and not to include land use petition submittals such as comprehensive plan amendments
and straight rezones.
Subcommittee discussion occurred on the language "The preserve shall be identified at the time
the first development order submittal that requires approval of a site plan or development order"
noting it would be beneficial to clarify the preserve identification is required at the time of
"application" for the referenced site plan or development order, i.e. the language to read"first
application submittal for a development order" or similar language.
Mr. Foley moved to approve the concept subject to Staff revising the language as discussed
above and returning the item to the Subcommittee for final consideration. Second by Mr.
Brooker. Carried unanimously 2- 0.
d. LDC Sections 6.06.03 and 10.02.11 —Submittal of Streetlight Plans
Staff reported the proposed change is to alter the professional requirements for submitting
streetlight plans from an"electrical engineer"to an"engineer" and delete the provision requiring
an electrical engineer to install streetlights. They noted it will provide consistency with Section
10.02.04 B.2.e.iv which provides the applicant's engineer may design streetlight plans on private
streets at the time of construction plan and final subdivision plat application submittal.
Mr. Foley moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the Board
of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment as presented. Second by Mr.
Brooker. Carried unanimously 2- 0.
e. LDC Sections 9.04.04—Specific Requirements for Minor After the Fact Encroachment
Staff reported the change is to address a conflict between the criteria established in the
administrative minor after-the-fact encroachment provisions.
Mr. Foley moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the Board
of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment as presented. Second by Mr.
Brooker. Carried unanimously 2- 0.
f. LDC Sections 10.02.03—Requirements for Site Development, Site Improvement Plans and
Amendments thereof
3
February 1, 2016
Staff reported the proposed amendment is to expand the Site Development Plan—Insubstantial
Change (SDPI)process to allow existing buildings, subject to the architectural standards of the
LDC,to make architectural modifications through the SDPI process.
Mr. Foley moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the Board
of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment as presented. Second by Mr.
Brooker. Carried unanimously 2- 0.
g. Code of Laws Section 2-1156—Planning Commission Powers and Duties
LDC Sections: Chapter 2—Administration, Article VII—Boards, Commissions, Committees
and Authorities, Division 20—Planning Commission, Section 2-1156—
Establishment; Powers and Duties
Staff reported the proposed amendment it to update the powers and duties of the Planning
Commission listed in the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances for consistency with
Ordinance No. 99-95 regarding Preliminary Subdivision Plats.
Mr. Foley moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the Board
of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment as presented. Second by Mr.
Brooker. Carried unanimously 2- 0.
Requirements for SDPI
Mr. Foley reported it would be beneficial to review the requirements for SDPI (Site
Development Plan Insubstantial) especially those uses involving redevelopment parcels.
Ms. Cilek reported there have been discussions on this item including recent changes proposed
to LDC Section 5.05.08 (Architectural Standards) facilitating the redevelopment of existing
parcels.
5. Next Meeting Date
The next meeting will be held on February 29, 2016 at 3:00pm
6. Public comments
None
7. Adjourn
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the
order of the Chair at 3:45PM.
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE -LAND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
4
February 1, 2016
These Minutes were approved by the Committee on , as presented , or as
amended
5