The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Agenda 03/17/2016 COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA MARCH 17, 2016 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., THURSDAY,MARCH 17,2016, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER,THIRD FLOOR,3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST,NAPLES,FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. NOTICE: ITEM 9D, THE ARCHITECTURAL LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS, WILL BE HEARD AFTER ALL OF THE LAND USE PETITIONS AND BEFORE 3 PM. THEREAFTER, IT WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 18,2016 6. BCC REPORT-RECAPS 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PL20150002525 / CPSS-2015-3: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map by revising the transitional conditional uses subdistrict to allow for the continued operation and expansion of the Naples Bridge Center. The subject property is located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway in Section 29,Township 49 South, Range 26 East,consisting of 4.68 acres;and furthermore, recommending transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic 1 Opportunity; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. [Coordinator: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner](Companion to CU-PL20150000873) B. CU-PL20150000873: A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida providing for the expansion of an existing conditional use which allows a social club in the Estates Zoning District pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.2, of the Collier County Land Development Code for property known as the Naples Bridge Center located at 5865 Golden Gate Parkway in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,Florida. [Coordinator:Nancy Gundlach,AICP,RLA,Principal Planner] C. PUDA-PL20150001084: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 14-24,the Buckley Mixed Use Planned Unit Development,to add single family detached dwellings and two-family,duplex dwellings as permitted uses in the residential component of the PUD, to add a master plan for residential development as an alternative to a mixed use or all commercial development, to add deviations to allow more signage and to allow dead-end streets. The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Airport-Pulling Road (CR 31) and Orange Blossom Drive in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 21.7+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator:Eric Johnson,AICP,CFM Principal Planner] Note: This item has been continued from the December 17,2015 CCPC meeting,the February 4,2016 CCPC meeting and the March 3,2016 CCPC meeting. D. An ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the comprehensive land regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by providing for: Section One, Recitals; Section Two, Findings of Fact; Section Three, Adoption of Amendments to the Land Development Code to make comprehensive changes to architectural and site design standards, more specifically amending the following: Chapter Two — Zoning Districts and Uses, including section 2.03.06 Planned Unit Development Districts, section 2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts; Chapter Four — Site Design and Development Standards, including section 4.02.12 Design Standards for Outdoor Storage, section 4.02.16 Design Standards for Development in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, section 4.02.37 Design Standards for Development in the Golden Gate Downtown Center Commercial Overlay District(GGDCCO), section 4.02.38 Specific Design Criteria for Mixed Use Development Within C-1 Through C-3 Zoning Districts,section 4.05.02 Design Standards, section 4.05.04 Parking Space Requirements, section 4.05.09 Stacking Lane Requirements, section 4.06.02 Buffer Requirements, section 4.06.03 Landscaping Requirements for Vehicular Use Areas and Rights-of-Way, section 4.06.05 General Landscaping Requirements; Chapter Five — Supplemental Standards, including section 5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards; Chapter Six—Infrastructure Improvements and Adequate Public Facilities Requirements, including section 6.06.02 Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, section 6.06.03 Streetlights; Chapter Ten — Application, Review, and Decision-Making Procedures, including section 10.02.15 Requirements for Mixed Use Projects Within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area; Section Four, Conflict and Severability; Section Five, Inclusion in the Collier County Land Development Code;and Section Six,Effective Date. [Coordinator:Jeremy Frantz,Senior Planner] 10. OLD BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. PUBLIC COMMENT 13. ADJOURN CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows/jmp 2 February 18, 2016 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples,Florida,February 18,2016 LET IT BE REMEMBERED,that the Collier County Planning Commission,in and for the County of Collier,having conducted business herein,met on this date at 9:00 a.m.,in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F"of the Government Complex,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples,Florida,with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Mark Strain Wafaa F.Assaad Stan Chrzanowski Diane Ebert Karen Homiak Charlette Roman Andrew Solis ALSO PRESENT: Raymond V.Bellows,Zoning Manager Nancy Gundlach,Principal Planner Heidi Ashton-Cicko,Managing Assistant County Attorney Tom Eastman, School District Representative Page 1 of 9 February 18, 2016 PROCEEDINGS CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning, everyone.Welcome to the Thursday,February 18th meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. If everybody will please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Could the secretary please do the roll call. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Yes. Good morning. Mr.Eastman? MR.EASTMAN: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mr.Chrzanowski? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mr. Solis? COMMISSIONER SOLIS: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Ms.Ebert is here. Chairman Strain? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Ms.Homiak? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mr.Assaad? COMMISSIONER ASSAAD: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: And,Ms.Roman? COMMISSIONER ROMAN: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Addenda to the agenda. The next meeting coming up is March 3rd. Does anybody know if they're not going to make it to that meeting? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. We'll have a quorum. I will know on the Wednesday before the meeting whether or not I'll be here. I got--which seems to be a very popular event for the Clerk of Courts is to call me to jury duty,so--but I get it more frequently,I think,than anybody else. So I've got another jury duty situation I've got to deal with,and I may be called that day.And if it is,I won't be here,but I'll try to notify Ray so he can let Karen know. And the other item is Item 9A. This is the Abaco Club RPUD. Staff has asked for a continuance until the March 3rd meeting. Does anybody have any questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there a motion to continue to March 3rd? COMMISSIONER ROMAN: So moved. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Second. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By Charlette,seconded by Diane. Discussion? Stan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Is this the one that last meeting you asked them-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: --why they weren't continuing it? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I knew they couldn't get it done by now,but they-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: --didn't think they--so anyway. It needs to be continued,just like we thought. So with that,all those in favor,signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER SOLIS: Aye. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. Page 2 of 9 February 18, 2016 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER ASSAAD: Aye. COMMISSIONER ROMAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 7-0. Planning--let's see. Approval of the minutes for December 17,2015. Does anybody have any changes? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Move to approve. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Made Karen. Seconded by? COMMISSIONER ROMAN: I'll second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Charlette. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor,signify by saying aye? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER SOLIS: Aye. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER ASSAAD: Aye. COMMISSIONER ROMAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 7-0. Ray,BCC report? MR.BELLOWS: Yes. On February 9th,the Board of County Commissioners heard the rezone PUD amendment for Rockedge that also included the termination of affordable housing density bonus agreement. That was approved subject to Planning Commission recommendations by a vote of 4-1 with Commissioner Henning opposed. And the conditional use for the Summit Church,the motion to approve failed by a vote of 3-2 with Commissioner Fiala and Taylor in opposition. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. I don't have a chairman's report. There is no consent for today. 9A,which is the Abaco project,has been continued. ***So that will move us into our remaining two advertised public hearings on the same matter. We will discuss those concurrently and then vote on them separately. The first one is a GMP amendment.It's for PL20150002354/CPSS-2015-2. It's for the Hibiscus PUD on Rattlesnake Hammock Road at the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock and Hibiscus Drive. The second part of that is a change to the PUD. It would be PUDA-PL20150002326. Same project, same location. So with that,all those wishing to testify on behalf of this item,please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Are there disclosures? We'll start at the end with Tom. MR.EASTMAN: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Stan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I didn't talk with anybody about this. COMMISSIONER SOLIS: None. COMMISSIONER EBERT: None. Page 3 of 9 February 18, 2016 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I've had conversations with staff,and I had a conversation with Mr. Arnold the other day. And I'm not sure if I spoke to Mr.Yovanovich or not; I can't recall if I did. And with that,Karen? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Nothing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Wafaa? COMMISSIONER ASSAAD: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Charlette? COMMISSIONER ROMAN: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. With that,we'll move right into the issue. We'll take questions from the--first of all,presentation of the applicant,and then we can start our questions on either one of the documents. MR.ARNOLD: Good morning. I'm Wayne Arnold with Grady Minor,professional planner on the project. With me is Rich Yovanovich,land use attorney,and Al Moscato,property owner. This is a small-scale amendment that was approved early--or late last year,and it created the Hibiscus residential infill subdistrict,and it authorized up to 64 dwelling units to be constructed on the 7-acre parcel that's located on Rattlesnake Hammock Road at the entrance to the Hibiscus Country Club. I don't know if you need a refresher,but we started out as an 84-unit project and,through the analysis,the project was reduced to 64 units ultimately approved by the Board. We had a restriction in the Comprehensive Plan language that said we would have a maximum building height of three stories. The change to the subdistrict today is very simple. It's changing three stories to allow four stories to be built on the property. That also carries forward to the PUD amendment,which we're changing the Development Standards Table to increase the height of the zoned and actual height by five feet to then support the four-story buildings that we're proposing. There was also a restriction on the maximum number of units per building,which we didn't really catch on the fly with the changes,from 84 to 64 units,but we're proposing to eliminate the 12-unit restriction and allow up to 16 units per building. That's really the essence of the two changes that we're proposing. If you need more discussion,I'm happy to,or we're happy to answer any questions you might have. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Any questions at this time from the Planning Commission? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Wayne,can you explain why,if you were able to do three stories with 84 units previously,you can't fit 64 units in three stories? MR.ARNOLD: We could fit 64 units in three stories. This really is a matter of,I guess,it's,one,of economics and,two,just efficiency.We can--a four-story building with 16 units,we can build fewer buildings on the site which allows us to really preserve more open space on the property and have fewer buildings than we would under the three-story scenario. And,again,it's an increase of five feet. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And then just out of curiosity,your construction technique,according to the NIM,you are going to build floor-to-ceiling heights of nine feet. So if you had three floors that,obviously, would be 27. Four floors would be 36. Why do you need the height that you're asking for today for zoned? I understand there's a thickness in the slab. Whether it's precast,post-tension or what,it's going to be a different thickness,but you seem to have a lot of latitude there,especially with the ductwork and air conditioning systems that would go in. What justified the construction technique to make that additional need? MR.ARNOLD: I'm not sure. Maybe Mr.Moscato can answer you on the construction side of that. But the buildings will have elevators at four stories,which has,you know,different appurtenances and then roofline,et cetera. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,the mechanical support of the building is an exception to the zoned height. Your zoned height,I believe,is going to,what,50 feet? MR.ARNOLD: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. You've got four stories at nine;that's 36. You've got six--if it's post-tensioning,it's going to be 6-or 8-inch slabs depending on your column spacement. If it's going to be Page 4 of 9 February 18, 2016 precast or it's going to be Keystone joists or something else,it's going to be deeper.How do you get the need for 50 feet? What construction technique are you using? How are you justifying that? MR.ARNOLD: I don't know the construction technique,Mr. Strain. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,that doesn't get us a lot of answers. The other question I have is in the Comp Plan,generally we try not to clutter the Comp Plan with stuff not needed,and there is no requirement in the FLUE regarding the height for this project. So why would we want to keep any reference to height or stories in the Comp Plan? Why don't we just strike that last sentence? Do you know why that is there? Is that put there by someone specifically with a purpose? MR.ARNOLD: Well,we put it there just as extra,I guess,caution. This was an infill subdistrict, and we were looking to put that height in there. I agree it's not always normal to put a height in your Comprehensive Plan language. I don't think we have a problem eliminating it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And if staff doesn't have,I think we could--we're going to be specifying in the PUD the height. And one of the changes in the PUD we need to add is a footnote to indicate 50 feet not to exceed four stories. So I'm just wondering why we need to keep it in the Comp Plan unless there's a reason from staff or somebody that it needs to be there. MR.ARNOLD: I'll let staff answer that,but we have no objection to removing it. And with regard to--you mentioned the footnote to me in our brief conversation,and I was wondering if--might it not be easier,then,in our development table where it says the 50 feet,and just to put "slash four stories"like is also done in others? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah,as long as it's"not to exceed." You want to have the ability to go less if you want to,but yeah. MR.ARNOLD: Correct,yes. I mean,it would be expressed as the maximum building height, which would be 50 feet or four stories. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. I have no--well,no. Fifty feet or four stories,but not to exceed--you can't exceed 50 feet. MR.ARNOLD: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I think that's a cleanup,because you've actually used the four stories as the crux of your argument. I think we ought to make sure four stories appears in the PUD somewhere. MR.ARNOLD: Okay. I have no objection to either adding a footnote or simply referencing it under the maximum building height. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Wayne,do you happen to have a photo of the planned development? MR.ARNOLD: I have a rendering that was prepared that was shown at the neighborhood information meeting of the four-story. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. Because the other places right around there,they're only three stories. So you're going above what is normal in that neighborhood. And I like Mark's thing,but I'd like to see your rendering. MR.ARNOLD: Nothing with color,but that was prepared by John Titus,the architect that's helping the property owner. COMMISSIONER ASSAAD: Mr.Chairman? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes, sir. I'm sorry,Wafaa. COMMISSIONER ASSAAD: I'd like to hear more about the justification for the higher density,the higher number of units. MR.ARNOLD: Well,our unit count isn't increasing. We're increasing the building height by five feet. We originally--as offered to the county,we had an 84-unit project. COMMISSIONER ASSAAD: You had an 84-unit-- MR.ARNOLD: Yes. And through the discussion of the Planning Commission and,ultimately,the Board,that number, 84,was reduced to 64 on this site. There's also some language that requires us to set aside in easements parts of the golf course so that the density actually is less. I mean,keep in mind,the owner of the golf course owns this property. We could have come in with the entirety of the golf course property and come in with an extremely low-density project. But this used to Page 5 of 9 February 18, 2016 be the old clubhouse for Hibiscus,those of us that have been around long enough to appreciate that. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Mark? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Is the height of the building measured halfway between the eve and the peak or how? MR.ARNOLD: The zoned height would be measured in that manner. The actual height is essentially the top of the roof or any of--the tallest point of the building. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. So you're going for the top of the roof but not of the stairwell,or is it the stairwell? MR.ARNOLD: Well,the elevator--any of the elevator equipment would count toward the actual building height. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. That looked like the stairwell. And I assume you're going to a taller building because,for a given square footage,the taller you are,the less of a footprint you have,the less of an impact you make on the water management system,and the more green space you have? MR.ARNOLD: That's correct. We ended up with fewer buildings on the site by increasing to four stories. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. COMMISSIONER ASSAAD: Do you have an illustrative site plan? MR.ARNOLD: To the bottom of the page is the existing canal,which is for orientation,and to the top is Rattlesnake Hammock. So you can see that this allows us to put three buildings on the Rattlesnake--on the west side of the Hibiscus Drive and then the one building to the east in this concept. It actually allows us to,in this manner,orient the buildings farther away from any of the residences off Doral Circle who attended our neighborhood meeting,and I don't believe they found any objection with what we're proposing. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Could you put that elevation back up? The slab-to-slab lines on this elevation are a scale;let's say they're nine feet because that's what you said at the NIM. If you go from the center point of that roof to the highest point of the highest tower,which is probably your stairwell or elevator to over on the left,it looks like you're going to need more than five feet because you're limited to 55 feet for actual. How do you plan to do that? MR.ARNOLD: I don't know. I'm not familiar with the construction techniques,Mr. Strain,in terms of-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm just trying to save you a time to have come back again,but okay. I mean,just by scale,you're not going to get to that highest tippy top of the--as,I think,Richard used to use the word"tippy top" --of that highest tower that you have on the left from the midpoint of that immediate roof that's over the building. So I don't know-- MR.ARNOLD: Well,I don't know that this is their construction-ready version. I mean,this was presented at the neighborhood meeting as the concept at the time. So,I mean,keep in mind the heights that we asked for are the maximum heights. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh,I know. I'm just trying to understand it. I mean,based on that rendering and scaling down from 55 feet,you wouldn't need to change the zoned height,but--because you've got too much height in your architectural features. Well,okay. We'll move on. Anybody else have any questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Is there a staff presentation? MS.GUNDLACH: Good morning,Commissioners. Staff is recommending approval. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do you see any problem with the removal of that one sentence in the GMP Plan section taking out the reference to the stories? MS.FAULKNER: Good morning. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning, Sue. MS.FAULKNER: Sue Faulkner,principal planner with Comprehensive Planning. Page 6 of 9 February 18, 2016 I do not see a problem with removing that final sentence with that restriction on the stories that are there. We had talked about that,actually,originally,but the proposed changes were brought to us in this manner. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody on the Planning Commission have any problem seeing that sentence deleted? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Great staff presentation. COMMISSIONER SOLIS: Very concise. MS.GUNDLACH: Thanks, Stan. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there any member--then,thank you,Sue. MS.FAULKNER: You're welcome. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else have any questions of staff at this time? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Is there--any members of the public wish to speak on this matter? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Seeing none,I'm assuming,Wayne,you don't want a rebuttal because you have nothing to rebut. So with that,we'll close the public hearing. Discussion for the Planning Commission? If the Planning Commission so pleases,I would suggest we,in our motion for the first one,which will be the GMP,to stipulate to drop that sentence since it isn't needed in the Growth Management Plan,and then the second one,that we add some language stipulating that "not to exceed" four stories within the PUD so that the height is tied to no more than four stories. Is there motions from the Planning Commission? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I'll make a motion to approve with those stipulations. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's do them each--yeah,the first one is for the GMP amendment. It's PL20150002354/CPSS-2015-2. And,Karen,are you still going to make a motion to approve subject-- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yes,I'll make a motion to approve. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: --to the one stipulation? Is there a second? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Second. COMMISSIONER ROMAN: I'll second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Seconded by Stan. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor,signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER SOLIS: Aye. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER ASSAAD: Aye. COMMISSIONER ROMAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposes? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 7-0. Second item for motion is PUDA-PL20150002326. Is there a motion with any stipulation? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Make a motion-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I'll move to approve PUDA-PL20150002326 with the stipulation. Page 7 of 9 February 18, 2016 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By Karen. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor,signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER SOLIS: Aye. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER ASSAAD: Aye. COMMISSIONER ROMAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 7-0. Thank you all. MR.ARNOLD: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That takes us to-- MR.BELLOWS: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Appreciate it. Yes, sir? MR.BELLOWS: One question. Will this need to come back on a summary or are you approving it without a summary? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It doesn't come back on consent unless we make a motion to do so. So I think the lack of such a motion would signify we don't need it back on consent,so... MR.BELLOWS: Thank you for the clarification. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Appreciate it. MR.ARNOLD: Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. There is no old business listed on the agenda.There is no new business. Is there any members of the public that wish to make any comments at this time? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Hearing none,is there a motion to adjourn? COMMISSIONER EBERT: I make a motion to adjourn. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By Karen(sic). Seconded by? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By Stan. All in favor,signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER SOLIS: Aye. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER ASSAAD: Aye. COMMISSIONER ROMAN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. We're out of here.Thank you. Page 8 of 9 February 18, 2016 There being no further business for the good of the County,the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 9:18 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MARK STRAIN,CHAIRMAN ATTEST DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK These minutes approved by the Board on ,as presented or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE,INC., BY TERRI LEWIS,COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. Page 9 of 9 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 1 wino cam oil coma MU:11"M cliZ' (vt° sfBYiT LW- A L A 30 iti.,___ 7:1A 081113t 4 u-71 00L1GIP* ES AT mecum. Puizoi THUM UNDARA MAC iiiikPROJECT LOCATION EieliatiftE Nimiftio i LAB 'HMO ,. _ t IfFIARMIOD ... lz a 3i 32 13 Er 0131WRIRE go LAKES aPi331 2015 GMP SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT (ADOPTION HEARING) Project/Petition#PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3-Companion Project#CU-PL20150000873 CCPC: MARCH 17, 2016 BCC: MAY 10, 2016 Clerk's Office TABLE OF CONTENTS CCPC -2015 GMP SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT ADOPTION HEARING CCPC MARCH 17,2016 [PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3 (COMPANION TO:CU-PL20150000873)I 1) TAB: Adoption Staff Report& DOCUMENTS: CCPC Staff Report: NIM Minutes Minutes of Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3 2) TAB: Ordinance DOCUMENTS: Adoption Ordinance with Exhibit "A" text (and/or maps): PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3 3) TAB: Legal Advertisement DOCUMENT: CCPC Legal Advertisement PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3 4) TAB: Petition DOCUMENT: PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3 Co er Con.tieLty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: March 17, 2016 RE: PETITION CPSS-2015-03/PL20150002525, SMALL SCALE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (Companion to CU- PL20150000873) [ADOPTION HEARING] ELEMENT: GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT AGENT/APPLICANT/OWNER(S): Agents/Applicant: Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Owner: Naples Bridge Center, Inc. 5865 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, comprising two abutting ±2.34-acre parcels totaling ±4.68 acres, is located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway (5845 and 5865 Golden Gate Parkway), approximately 1/3 mile west of Santa Barbara Blvd., in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East (Golden Gate Planning Community). Zoning Division•2800 North Horseshoe Drive•Naples,FL 34104•239-252-2400 Page 1 of 8 4 wirk.-.41-?Iv - ''P' - a, ,...,.__ : , .,*.,,_ , . a iimiriat. AL 111444 - „ :-.'..:':: ,- 7 `y r - r a f=' P oposed jar` a I ' Project Site ..:00,_,-,."‘-`% > pp .fir' .- e ' ` 9t , a tl ° � ¢, I i I 411 iii ,GAE Pm),®OLDEN �—f3�. y I T J ily7ti.4)‘, ,:1,,,. „lozi: .:‘,1.', .. . , a g bR.� f x - u RR e IA 1! ti - - _ . __ REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant proposes a small-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), specifically the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, to create an exception, for the Naples Bridge Center, to the prohibition on conditional uses for properties located on Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The exception would recognize the ±2.34-acre property on which there is an existing conditional use for the Naples Bridge Center and the ±2.34-acre parcel adjacent to the east of the existing facility, also owned by the Naples Bridge Center. The applicant also proposes to create a new map ("Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions"), for inclusion in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan map series, to identify the two properties as not subject to the conditional use prohibition. The proposed amended Subdistrict text is as follows: (Single underline text is added and is also reflected in the Ordinance Exhibit A). 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION A. Estates-Mixed Use District Zoning Division•2800 North Horseshoe Drive•Naples,FL 34104•239-252-2400 Page 2 of 8 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict [Page 27] b) Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: • Conditional uses shall not be permitted on those parcels immediately adjacent to the west side of Collier Boulevard within the Estates Designated Area except where the parcel is directly bounded by conditional uses on two (2) or more side yards with no intervening rights-of-ways or waterways; and, except as provided in subparagraph 2., below; and, except for essential services, as described in paragraph a), above. • Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the 1-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict; except as provided in paragraph 3.b)3., below; and, except as provided in subparagraph 1., below; and, except for essential services, as described in paragraph a), above. • Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, shall be approved for conditional uses except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict; and, except as provided in subparagraph 1., below; and, except for essential services, as described in paragraph a), above. This provision shall not be construed to affect the area described in paragraph a), above. 1. In consideration of the improvements associated with the interchange at Interstate 75 and Golden Gate Parkway, the existing conditional use (church and related facilities) located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 66th Street S.W. may be expanded in acreage and intensity along the south side of Golden Gate Parkway to the east of 66th Street S.W., but the total project area shall not exceed approximately 9.22 acres (see Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Map). 2. The parcel located immediately south of the Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict, on the west side of Collier Boulevard, and at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, shall be eligible for a transitional conditional use designation. 3. Conditional use for expansion of the existing educational and charitable social organization (Naples Bridge Center) is allowed on the east 150 feet of Tract 75 and the west 150 feet of Tract 82, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. The maximum building area permitted on the two parcels shall be limited to 15,000 square feet. Use of Tract 82 shall be limited to parking, water management and open space uses. See Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions map. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the Growth Management Plan Amendment is to create an exception, for the Naples Bridge Center, to the prohibition on conditional uses for properties located on Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The exception would recognize the property on which there is an existing provisional/conditional use for the Naples Bridge Center and the ±2.34-acre parcel adjacent to the east of the existing facility. Zoning Division•2800 North Horseshoe Drive•Naples,FL 34104•239-252-2400 Page 3 of 8 The amendment is necessary in order to permit the Naples Bridge Center to seek a conditional use to increase the size of the existing Bridge Center building on the existing conditional use site, and to permit parking, open space and water management facilities on the adjacent (added) Estates property. SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: Subject Property: The +4.68-acre subject site is zoned E, Estates, and is designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict on the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map. The Naples Bridge Center is currently developed and operates on the western ±2.34-acre parcel with a Conditional Use #2 for a social and fraternal organization. The eastern ±2.34-acre parcel is undeveloped. Surrounding Land Uses: North: Immediately adjacent to the north, residential single-family units, zoned Estates and designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; in the surrounding area to the north, mostly residential single-family units, zoned Estates and designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. South: Immediately adjacent to the south (across Golden Gate Parkway), a child care center/private school and a church, zoned Estates with provisional/conditional uses and designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; in the surrounding area to the south, mostly residential single-family units, zoned Estates and designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. West: Immediately adjacent to the west, residential single-family unit, zoned Estates and designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; in the surrounding area to the west, mostly residential single-family units, zoned Estates and designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict and four parcels of land zoned Estates and designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict. East: Immediately adjacent to the east, residential single-family unit, zoned Estates and designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; in the surrounding area to the east, mostly residential single-family units, zoned Estates and designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. There is also an undeveloped parcel at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Blvd. zoned Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) and designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict for a mixed office development. Zoning Division•2800 North Horseshoe Drive• Naples,FL 34104•239-252-2400 Page 4 of 8 STAFF ANALYSIS: Background and Considerations: According to the petition, "Naples Bridge Center was founded in 1976, has continually occupied the current property since that time, and has continued to see growth in memberships. Naples Bridge Center is the only member-owned club in Collier County not affiliated as an informal neighborhood-based club. The membership includes residents from both Collier and Lee Counties, as well as visiting members worldwide. Growth is anticipated to continue at historical levels." On July 8, 1980, a Provisional Use #6 for a social organization (Naples Bridge Center) was granted by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (via Resolution No. 80-128) to operate at 5865 Golden Gate Parkway (Folio No. 31866600002). Following the adoption of the Land Development Code in 1991, Naples Bridge Center was granted a Conditional Use #2 (via Resolution No. 94-424) for the establishment of a social and fraternal organization and its building expansion in accordance with a conceptual Master Plan. Naples Bridge Center owns two ±2.34-acre parcels and currently operates with provisional/conditional uses for a social and fraternal organization on the western parcel at 5865 Golden Gate Parkway. The petitioner is proposing to revise the text in the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan by adding an exception, for the Naples Bridge Center, to the prohibition on conditional uses for properties located on Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The text revision would include the existing conditional use of the ±2.34-acre western parcel and the requested conditional use for the Naples Bridge Center expansion of the ±2.34-acre eastern parcel. Compatibility: As noted, the Naples Bridge Center owns two ±2.34-acre parcels and currently operates on the western parcel at 5865 Golden Gate Parkway with a conditional use for a social and fraternal organization. Naples Bridge Center is situated among a mix of residential single-family properties and properties with existing provisional/conditional uses for churches, schools and institutional uses. Naples Bridge Center is a mature organization, with a steadily growing membership, that has continually operated and co-existed with its neighbors since the early 1980's at this location. Naples Bridge Center is a low intensity use with varying hours of operation (approximately 8:00 A.M. to no later than 10:30 P.M.). According to the petition, "Naples Bridge Center is used seven days per week." There are normally sessions every morning and afternoon. In addition, there are evening games a couple of days a week. Two-day tournaments (typically, Fridays and Saturdays) are held twice a year at the Naples Bridge Center. Though the Naples Bridge Center has been in operation for over 30 years in the same location, Comprehensive Planning staff defers to Zoning staff for compatibility analysis as part of the conditional use process when the entire project is evaluated (building heights, setbacks, buffering, building mass, building orientation, etc.). Zoning Division•2800 North Horseshoe Drive•Naples,FL 34104•239-252-2400 Page 5 of 8 Justifications for Proposed Amendment: The applicant's justification for the requested amendment is to meet the demands for additional members. The Naples Bridge Center is pursuing an exception to the prohibition of conditional uses at this location as opposed to re-locating for the following reasons: 1) over 30 years of operation and successfully co-existing with neighbors at this location; 2) easy access to 1-75 for members who do not come from the surrounding neighborhood; and 3) the location is readily- recognizable and found by seasonal visitors. Identification and Analysis of the Pertinent Small-Scale GMPA Criteria in Florida Statutes Chapter 163.3187: Process for adoption of small scale comprehensive plan amendment. (1) A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a)The proposed amendment involves a use of 10 acres or fewer. [The subject site comprises ±4.68 acres.] (b) The cumulative annual effect of the acreage for all small scale development amendments adopted by the local government does not exceed a maximum of 120 acres in a calendar year. [No small scale GMP amendments have been approved in calendar year 2016.] (c) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment does include a text change to the Comprehensive Plan and those text changes are directly related to the proposed future land use map amendment which includes the creation of a new map titled, "Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions".] (d) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not located within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (2) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. [Internal consistency will be maintained if the amendment is approved.] Environmental Impacts and Historical and Archaeological Impacts: A Senior Environmental Specialist with the Collier County Surface Water and Environmental Planning Section reviewed the environmental report and found no environmental, archaeological or historic site impacts. Zoning Division•2800 North Horseshoe Drive•Naples,FL 34104•239-252-2400 Page 6 of 8 Public Facilities Impacts: A consultant working with Collier County Public Utilities completed his review and approved this petition in December 2015. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS: A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), as required by Land Development Code (LDC) Section 10.03.05 A, was duly advertised, noticed, and held on December 14, 2015, 5:30 p.m. at Naples Bridge Center located at 5865 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34116. This NIM was advertised, noticed, and held jointly for this small scale GMP amendment and the companion Conditional Use petition. The applicant's team gave a presentation and then responded to questions. A total of one member of the public along with approximately 5 members of the Naples Bridge Center signed in at the NIM. The public asked questions about the project details. No one voiced opposition to the amendment. The next door neighbor was concerned about the landscape buffering and whether it would still give him privacy after the removal of exotics. The meeting ended at approximately 5:45 p.m. Following the closure of the meeting, one additional member of the public came in with questions/concerns about potential increases in the weekday traffic backup (between 8:30 and 9:00 A.M.) on the eastbound turn lane at the closest median opening to Naples Bridge Center. [synopsis prepared by Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section] FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS: • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historic or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no transportation-related concerns as a result of this petition. • There are no utility-related concerns as a result of this petition. • The use has existed on a portion of this site for±30 years, and the building expansion will be confined to the existing site (westerly parcel). • The use is generally compatible with surrounding development. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney's Office on February 26, 2016. The criteria for GMP amendments to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element are in Sections 163.3177(1)(f) and 163.3177(6)(a)2, Florida Statutes. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve for adoption and transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. Zoning Division•2800 North Horseshoe Drive•Naples,FL 34104•239-252-2400 Page 7 of 8 PREPARED BY: C5---;1 Or- ----6 °L.----_ DATE: L` " /C SUE FAULKNER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: 111 rk 1 bitA DATE: DAVID WEEKS, AICP, GROWTH MANAGEMENT MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, ZONING DIVISION "="2 DATE: 2424— /i. MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR ZONING DIVISION APPROVED BY: __4114.11141,4° ---- _ DATE 3 / ES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT r j DATE: DAVID S. WILKISON, , DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Petition Number: PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3 Staff Report for March 17, 2016 CPCC meeting NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the May 10, 2016 BCC meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: Mark P. Strain, CHAIRMAN Zoning Division•2800 North Horseshoe Drive•Naples,FL 34104•239-252-2400 Page 8 of 8 1 1 2 TRANSCRIPT OF THE 3 NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER 4 CONDITIONAL USE AND GMPA 5 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 6 December 14, 2015 7 5:30 p.m. 8 9 10 11 Appearances: 12 WAYNE ARNOLD 13 ED KANT 14 SUE FAULKNER 15 NANCY GUNDLACH 16 SHARON UMPENHOUR 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 1 MR. ARNOLD: All right. Good evening, 2 everybody. I'm Wayne Arnold of GradyMinor, and 3 this is Sharon Umpenhour from our office. She'll 4 be recording the neighborhood meeting. 5 It looks like most of the folks here are 6 either staff or the Bridge Center. I know we have 7 Russell Tuff (phonetic) from the Golden Gate Civic 8 Association tonight, and then a neighbor, Vlad 9 (phonetic) , I think is your name. So we have two 10 members of the public that I'll try to address what 11 we're going through in the process and then open it 12 up for some questions and probably exchange 13 (indiscernible) . 14 Do you think my voice is okay? 15 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah 16 (indiscernible) . 17 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. The process we're going 18 through is a two-step process. We're actually 19 amending the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow a 20 conditional use to be approved on the eastern-most 21 parcel that we have here. The Bridge Center bought 22 that property and is seeking to expand the 23 facilities on the existing tract that we're sitting 24 in, but we would limit then, through the 25 conditional use, improvements on this part of the 3 1 property to parking. 2 This is kind of the concept plan we're working 3 from, showing an expansion of the Bridge Center 4 that would be authorized through the conditional 5 use and the plan amendment language, limiting 6 ourselves to a maximum of 15, 000 total square feet. 7 It's a little bit bigger than the proposed 8 expansion that they're looking at, but really 9 wanting to make sure that if they need to make 10 minor incremental changes in the future, that they 11 don't have to come back through this process every 12 time. 13 And then this is the property that's to the 14 east that we're adding as part of the conditional 15 use in the plan amendment, and we've limited 16 ourselves to preserve open space and parking uses 17 on that site. None of the physical building 18 improvements supporting the Bridge Center would be 19 located there. . 20 And also made a provision for a small 21 maintenance building to be built in the future, 22 just to allow the Bridge Center to maintain its 23 property. 24 So the process we're in, we've had one 25 sufficiency round of comments from the county 4 1 staff. They've asked for some technical things 2 related to the comprehensive plan. Zoning, I don't 3 think we have any significant issues of any kind, 4 but for our neighbor, we're calling that a minimum 5 30-foot wide vegetative buffer along our eastern 6 boundary adjacent to you. 7 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Is it set in stone? 8 Is it fixed, like, you know, you aren't going to 9 change it to, say, 20 or 50 in the future? 10 MR. KANT: No. I can sit here and represent 11 that I told you 30. It' s going to be at least 30. 12 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. 13 MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, and we don't have the 14 details of that. We just simply called it, for 15 this purpose, as a vegetative buffer, but if 16 there's additional dialogue between you and 17 Mr. Kant or any of the Bridge members, you know, 18 certainly let us know if there's details there that 19 you need. 20 But that process that we're going through, 21 again, that's a comp -- small scale plan amendment 22 and a conditional use. We don't have any hearing 23 dates established. We kind of went through those 24 loosely with the comprehensive planning staff 25 today, and we would hope to get through this 5 1 process maybe April or May time frame in the 2 spring, but, of course, like any of you who have 3 seen them, we'll post zoning signs. You're within 4 the noticed radius where you will get a letter 5 indicating that there' s an upcoming public hearing. 6 And then with the Civic Association, I know 7 that the -- some of the Bridge representatives have 8 met with your group and I think we had a pretty 9 positive outcome, but if we need to come and make a 10 presentation to your group at some point, you know, 11 if you'd let us know, we'd be happy to come back 12 and do that once some of these details are flushed 13 out. 14 That's really kind of what we're doing. 15 I think I forgot to introduce Nancy Gundlach. 16 MS. GUNCLACH: Hi. 17 MR. ARNOLD: She's the planner handling the 18 conditional use application. 19 And then we have Sue Faulkner, who is here 20 from comprehensive planning handling the small 21 scale amendment. 22 And for the amendment to the comp plan, 23 there's -- just so everybody is aware, there was a 24 prohibition on more conditional uses and commercial 25 development on the Parkway. So we're amending that 6 1 section to allow this to be an exempted site. 2 It was different than, Vlad, you may remember 3 like the David Lawrence Center, they kind of 4 created their own district and road standards. 5 We're looking to really create our standards 6 through the conditional use process, so just a 7 little different, but the same result at the end of 8 the day. It allows us to expand on the existing 9 property and then put our parking, water 10 management, open space on the other parcel. 11 It's really -- I think that's it, in a 12 nutshell. I mean, I'm happy to answer any 13 questions that you may have. I know members of the 14 board, you may not have been as plugged in as Ed 15 has been, but happy to field any questions from 16 anybody, or if you have questions of staff. 17 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Will the rear of 18 the -- will the rear of the property be taken -- 19 the vegetation taken off to create the swale? 20 MR. ARNOLD: Some of it will. We're proposing 21 to -- the county has a native vegetation retention 22 requirement. And they told us that we need about 23 .4 acres, so a little under half an acre. This 24 plan represents about half an hour of native 25 vegetation preservation, and we're keeping most of 7 1 that along the back side, but behind what's been 2 previously cleared. 3 And then we're not calling preserve adjacent 4 on this so we can treat it as a landscape buffer. 5 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I see. 6 MR. KANT: However, if I might interject, one 7 of the things that we want to try to do is to keep 8 as much of this native as possible the way it is, 9 maybe get rid of some of the wild stuff, the 10 peppers and that type of thing, but, frankly, it' s 11 to our advantage to do that because it's just that 12 much less we're going to have to spend on 13 re-vegetating, you know, to get that landscape 14 buffer. 15 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. 16 MR. KANT: So we want to try to keep as much 17 of what's in there natural as we can. 18 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Was that expected 19 to be water retention, then? 20 MR. ARNOLD: Well, the area back here, we're 21 calling that as probable water management area. We 22 can use parts of landscape buffers for water 23 management, but Mike Dowlett (phonetic) , one of our 24 engineers, is actually working on the site 25 development plan and looking at how we're going to 8 1 treat that 30 feet, and I don't think we have to 2 rely on it for water management. Maybe some 3 conveyance from collecting some of it to bring it 4 back here, but not much of it. 5 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay. 6 MR. ARNOLD: If any. We're not quite there 7 yet. 8 MR. KANT: Yeah, probably, I would think -- 9 well Thur -- again, I don't know that it' s germane 10 to this meeting, but we have a meeting, preliminary 11 pre-app set up for Thursday afternoon with the 12 county to talk about the site development plan, and 13 at that point, we hope to get a little bit better 14 handle on, you know, how much are they going to 15 look for water management, you know, what type of 16 water management features. 17 But our biggest change from a water management 18 point of view is the parking area. And that may 19 drive what type of surface we use. It might drive 20 what type of islanding, curbing and things like 21 that, or lack thereof, that we need to do. 22 So, you know, that' s really down the road at 23 this point. 24 MR. ARNOLD: Anything else? (Indiscernible) ? 25 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. I'll just add 9 1 that I would like to, you know, have that 30-foot 2 wide vegetative buffer the way it is. 3 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. 4 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Because I do have a 5 pool there. I would like to keep privacy -- 6 MR. ARNOLD: Uh-huh. Sure. 7 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: -- on that side of 8 the piece of property. 9 MR. ARNOLD: Right. Understood. 10 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So, yeah, I mean I 11 would appreciate if you just kept it the way it is. 12 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. To the extent we can. I 13 mean, if there' s Brazilian pepper (indiscernible) 14 going to have to come off. 15 MR. KANT: Yeah, if there's Brazilian pepper 16 (indiscernible) going to be removed. Yeah, we have 17 to. 18 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, take that out, 19 yeah, yeah, yeah. 20 MR. KANT: And then if we have to, we only 21 wind up (indiscernible) . 22 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I (indiscernible) 23 taken out when I -- because it's -- I have 24 breakouts and it' s just -- that stuff is very 25 annoying. 10 1 MR. ARNOLD: Hey, Norm. 2 MR. KANT: I want to make sure that it's clear 3 in this public meeting, it's not a public hearing, 4 but this public meeting, that we have represented 5 to Mr. Amuloff (phonetic) that that would be a 6 30-foot vegetative buffer. And we have no 7 intention of changing that. 8 I can't say that it's going to be 30.00 -- 30 9 feet, point zero zero inches. It might be, you 10 know, 30 feet and one inch, it might be 29 feet, 11 11 and three-quarters inches, but it's going to be 30 12 feet, especially (indiscernible) . And, 13 unfortunately, it is so thick in there, until we 14 start doing some clearing, I'm not sure what we're 15 going to find, so. 16 What I wanted to protect against is us having 17 to spend money to plant where there's already good 18 plantings. That's what I wanted to protect 19 against. 20 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Well, it sounds 21 like you like it the way it is now, anyway, so if a 22 minimal amount has to come out because it's 23 foreign, that's what we take out. 24 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. 25 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. 11 1 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And this is your, 2 like, maximum footprint of that parking lot, right? 3 So you may actually decide to build something 4 smaller (indiscernible) . 5 MR. KANT: That's correct. Yeah -- 6 MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, we're in the design stages 7 right now, trying to -- between working with the 8 architect, who the Bridge Center has retained, and 9 trying to do the site design. Like Ed said, once 10 we go to our pre-application meeting with the 11 county staff, we'll be able to go back and refine 12 that. 13 I mean, I can't tell you that we're not going 14 to make some of the -- this is going to be maybe a 15 redesign area, and to make up some of the parking 16 that we may lose here, we may end up putting 17 another tier of parking back here or something, 18 but -- 19 MR. KANT: Yeah, I just -- I want to make it 20 clear that what we're showing here is both what's 21 here now and what we anticipated when this was done 22 in -- in March -- no, in September, three months 23 ago. 24 We may -- we may be able to narrow those down 25 a bit. We want to, because I know we're talking 12 1 about changing the traffic flow so that we get more 2 of a one-way type of flow through here. When we do 3 that, we may not need all of this much island, in 4 which case we might be able to pull that in a 5 little bit, but I don't want to make that promise 6 to you now. I just don't know. 7 What I will make the representation to you now 8 is that's 30 feet. 9 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. 10 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. 11 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Sounds good. 12 MR. ARNOLD: All right. Anything else 13 (indiscernible) ? 14 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, just as the 15 Golden Gate Civic Association, we had voted to -- 16 in favor of the concept, and they were good 17 neighbors, and we've appreciated what they've done 18 in making it good, and so we were favorable, and 19 that was, unless there was some objections from 20 residential, but we like the idea. 21 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. Good. 22 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thought it was a 23 good use of (indiscernible) . 24 MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. I think that we've had 25 that dialogue with the county. It makes so much 13 1 sense, with the infrastructure that's in place, to 2 build on what's here, and they've been good 3 neighbors for 30 plus years, so that' s why we're 4 all pursuing this avenue. 5 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Unless 6 (indiscernible) but I didn't bring the letter and I 7 did look for it quick, but I think we wrote a 8 letter in support (indiscernible) . 9 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes. Yes, we did. 10 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. 11 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) more 12 detail than that if we need it. 13 MR. ARNOLD: Anything else? Vlad, Russell? 14 Okay. Anybody else? 15 Meeting adjourned. 16 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thank you. 17 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I also move 18 (indiscernible) . 19 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thank you. 20 MR. ARNOLD: Good timing, huh? 21 (Recording concluded. ) 22 23 24 25 14 1 STATE OF FLORIDA 2 COUNTY OF COLLIER 3 4 I, Joyce B. Howell, do hereby certify that: 5 1. The foregoing pages numbered 1 through 13 6 contain a full, true and correct transcript of 7 proceedings in the above-entitled matter, transcribed 8 by me to the best of my knowledge and ability from a 9 digital audio recording. 10 2. I am not counsel for, related to, or 11 employed by any of the parties in the above-entitled 12 cause. 13 3. I am not financially or otherwise 14 interested in the outcome of this case. 15 16 SIGNED AND CERTIFIED: 17 18 Date: December 21, 2015 Joyce B. Howell 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDINANCE NO. 2016- - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP BY REVISING THE CONDITIONAL USES SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION AND EXPANSION OF THE NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 4.68 ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20150002525 / CPSS-2015-3] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Naples Bridge Center, Inc. requested an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map to allow for the continued operation and expansion of the Naples Bridge Center; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small Scale Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Subdistrict property is not located in an area of critical state concern or an area of critical economic concern; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on March 17, 2016 considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan and recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and [15-CMP-00960/1240469/1]58 1 of 3 PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3 Naples Bridge Center Small Scale GMPA—2/23/16 Words underlined are added,words struelf-thr-eugh have been deleted. WHEREAS,the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and held public hearings concerning the proposed adoption of the amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan on May 10, 2016; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this small scale amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text and map amendments are attached hereto as Exhibit "A"and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after the state land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan amendment package is complete. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the state land planning agency. [15-CMP-00960/1240469/1]58 2 of 3 PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3 Naples Bridge Center Small Scale GMPA—2/23/16 Words underlined are added,words stFusic--thr-eugh have been deleted. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of ,2016. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Donna Fiala, Chairwoman Approved as to form and legality: pcd??\fit Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—Proposed Text and Map Amendment [15-CMP-00960/1240469/1]58 3 of 3 PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3 Naples Bridge Center Small Scale GMPA—2/23/16 Words underlined are added,words sslcough have been deleted. EXHIBIT A GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION *** *** *** * * * * *** *** *** *** ** ** A. Estates-Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict [Page 27] Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: a) Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are defined as: • electric or gas generating plants, • effluent tanks, • major re-pump stations, • sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, • hospitals and hospices, • water aeration or treatment plants, • governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), • public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and • public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. b) Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: • Conditional uses shall not be permitted on those parcels immediately adjacent to the west side of Collier Boulevard within the Estates Designated Area except where the parcel is directly bounded by conditional uses on two (2) or more side yards with no intervening rights-of-ways or waterways; and, except as provided in subparagraph 2., below; and, except for essential services, as described in paragraph a), above. • Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the 1-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for Page 1 Row of asterisks(*** *** ***)denotes break in text. Page_I of___ properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict; except as provided in paragraph 3.b)3., below; and, except as provided in subparagraph 1., below; and, except for essential services, as described in paragraph a), above. • Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, shall be approved for conditional uses except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict; and, except as provided in subparagraph 1., below; and, except for essential services, as described in paragraph a), above. This provision shall not be construed to affect the area described in Paragraph a), above. 1. In consideration of the improvements associated with the interchange at Interstate 75 and Golden Gate Parkway, the existing conditional use (church and related facilities) located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 66th Street S.W. may be expanded in acreage and intensity along the south side of Golden Gate Parkway to the east of 66th Street S.W., but the total project area shall not exceed approximately 9.22 acres (see Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Map). 2. The parcel located immediately south of the Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict, on the west side of Collier Boulevard, and at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, shall be eligible for a transitional conditional use designation. 3. Conditional use for expansion of the existing educational and charitable social organization (Naples Bridge Center) is allowed on the east 150 feet of Tract 75 and the west 150 feet of Tract 82, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. The maximum building area permitted on the two parcels shall be limited to 15,000 square feet. Use of Tract 82 shall be limited to parking, water management and open space uses. See Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions map. c) Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood Centers subject to the following criteria: 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood Center, 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with both residential and commercial such as churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers, schools, and group care facilities, 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments whenever possible, 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75- foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted, Page 2 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Page =2' of PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. d) Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non- residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: • Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use (zoned or developed); • Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; • Conditional uses shall be located on the allowable acreage adjacent to the non- residential use; • Site shall not be adjacent to a church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home, children's home, rehabilitation centers; and • Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; • Site shall not be adjacent to permitted Essential Service, as identified in Section 2.6.9 of the Land Development Code, except for libraries and museums; and • Project shall provide adequate buffering from adjacent properties allowing residential uses. e) Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria: 1. Temporary use (TU) permits for model homes, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. Conditional use permits for the purpose of extending the time period for use of the structure as a model home shall be required, and shall be subject to the provisions of Section 5.04.04B. and C. of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. Such conditional uses shall not be subject to the locational criteria of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict, and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, are not subject to the locational criteria for Conditional Uses and may be allowed anywhere within the Estates-Mixed Use District. 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship, as provided for in the Estates zoning district, is allowed on Tract 22, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 97. 4. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship as allowed in the Estates Zoning District is allowed on the north 180 feet of Tract 107, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. Church-related day care use shall not be allowed. Development shall be limited to a maximum of 12,000 square feet of floor area. Page 3 Page of_r 0 M O U d U N o m o6.4 cn(Z z J W ZOO. a r� J O M 292 P Z 14 886,11 trzi a. _ __ .. - 1 11/1:........-r -- _ < t7 1 -QA I B V21VIDIV9 V1NVS m z z w W a of ; , O 1-1 a w . . . ... _ �- 1 F __ a U U , W - ._ . Ii a 0 g" o z it I Q , ". . 00 !h < w WWI : • h._N.. car m _.y _ - a z -. z 0 Z i P: ° U O Q U ZM ZLuLo s N wU 0a Q 'p Ca Page of r m a 0 D W�� r°Ca EXHIBIT "A" PETITION PL20150002525/CP-2015-03 LEGEND A URBAN DESIGNATION ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL/WEAL DESIGNATION O� OW 91101. «.1N9T p R9.4_.91E11ENT AM 1MMCT ��/// MCP WSW eroccARA.sums. o REa.A..E_,.�.a ct 911091ST' .9e 51°_ ) 9®.5,191 OVERLAYS""° GOLDEN GATE AREA OVVERLA FEATURES ■99M1RNN Cd1G COMPCN4 9.151ut1 ❑-..„.99904100/ J�s uP�"a=nor 5.51)∎t✓.:"a `°'°°"°01 ' ■ N&tk aR1 FUTURE LAND USE MAP ■w59 959 Arn.,,.Crxm9.R.9.�9mcT ■I.s99«9s1s9rc1 1 o«o ■Lamm Su 911107 ■E.2 i.RNbu. Ill IMN)A.4AAR4 T99N1.99.21.,90, • _R.ND,.:Z9:..R99 E ■ +c, .1,sg�. mo47.-- 99„e.I.04.11. _. ■0wlw imam..rne,.rou.2.99.5015.■ "LA.55¢ 0 a 0.3 IMMOKALEE ROAD ■Pere 1049.99 wen 990 9043111 / 2J ■.Amu.9wv9R;COOK...9mcnNCT / ■c5wa0 _ [MI5 ❑mRu=nNC1 DIES COW/030k ❑g.RSSxt 111 9091x910219 1040(51/19190/ N .50.0.9 NC emus.CG99TA6 MAKS.519 51x9 109E a9wATa.xaoPOON MOM OF.t 9011 WI MCA 1.1591.0 1.N. 1 G CC cd DD > OIL WELL ROAD C .4 in F m IMMOKALEE ROAD I"Illi ss Z RANDALL BOULEVARD 0 te ;3 A R 10 VANDERBILT ce BEACH ROAD A W r9. m U GOLDEN GATE r BOULEVARD 0 Z Ad O O PINE RIDGE RD. 3 WHITE BLVD. 0 CS WwWWITT > G O1 Q r I .2 Q GI F• C , _ %` m O O Z o a 2 R G.O.PKWY. min I < O O 14. ' S 2 Du 343`ITS- O • INTERST 75 N. 441 . S.R.84 DAVIS BOULEVARD< a A SUBJECT S.R.84 x SITE - - - a T CP-2015-03 t g CO O a W U .l LO 2 f 94,1 O W e T l I4 GOLDEN GATE W __..�_ FUTURE LAND USE MAP ___._._ .07 MO - FE9A■ARi.184 I *WENDED - OE2007-1 4.300] AMENDED - MAY 19,1992 . )-)) ... 77 - -- AAgN MASER- 1'03fA t1.2004 .__ AMENDED - MAY 24 1993 OM ND.2009-59 - AMENDED - JULY 2),1993 AMEN0(0 - .23 Y 2d,9010 __ ORS NO 2010-31 to AMENDED - min.12.1981 AMENDED - JAY 24 2010 Om '.1 AMENDED - MARCH 14.1995 ORD.N0.2010-32 _,^_. _-.- RI ' AMENDED - 5EPTEMBER 14,2011 Q --- F AMENDED - OCTOBER 27.1997 090 NO.2011-29 f AMENDED - APRIL 10.'998 AMENDED - NOVEMBER 14 2019 -- _...._ ORO.00,2911-91 AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 4 1999 AMENDED-00YEM3ER 70.2015 "�_' 0 -..--- AMENDED - MAY O.2 Z3,1999 Ion Nu.2019 E2) Q j AMENDED - MAY 9.2000 V_- AMENDED - MARCH 13.2001 AMENDED - RAY 14.2002 .0.00(0 - 9071090(8 14 0003 SCALE ORD.ND 2003-44 AMENDED - OCTOBER 24 2003 1 Page 1 of__„_ ORD.ND 2004-T O 1 MI. 2 W. 3 MI. 4 MI. 5 ML AMENDED - JANUARY 25.2005 ORD.NO.2045-3 PREPARED BY:G5/CAD MAPPING 5EDDON AMEND-32 - JANUARY 2!,200) GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AMEND-32 ORD.NO.200)-19 DATE 1/2014 nu:CP-2015-3-1.DMA I R26E I R27E I R28E PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE &A RESOLUTION Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on March 17,2016,commencing at 9:00 A.M.in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber, Third Floor, County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP BY REVISING THE CONDITIONAL USES SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION AND EXPANSION OF THE NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 4.68 ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3] AND A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE WHICH ALLOWS A SOCIAL CLUB IN THE ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.01.B.1.C.2, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER LOCATED AT 5865 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA.[CU-PL20150000873] PARKWAY ZONE �$0\ NAPLES GOLDEN GATE ESTATES PROMENADE G(i GP JAYCEES UNIT 30 CLUBHOUSE JACARANDA ✓� 30 29 CENTER rte`G QQ' GOLDEN GATE ESTATES , r — s 28 OUNDERS UNIT 29 COLONADES AT PLAZA SANTA BARBARA PARKWAY PLACE PROJECT CENTER PARKWAY — LOCATION I BERKSHIRE LAKES HERON L __ (DRI) LAKES ¢ INTERSTATE-75 BRIAR WOOD - zo 31 32 33 °o BERKSHIRE m?, LAKES GREEN Z m (DRI) HERON > - ¢ (DRI) a (C.R.856) Z RADIO ROAD All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE& RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section,2800 N. Horseshoe Dr.,Naples,between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,fourth floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Suite 401 Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the GMD Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday, March 17,2016, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Mark P.Strain,Chairman Collier County Planning Commission No.947654 February 26.2016 COPY APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SECTION 20 TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH RANGE 26 EAST PREPARED FOR: Naples Bridge Center, Inc. 5865 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 239.455.4445 BY: D. Wayne Arnold,AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 239.947.1144 November 2015 Revised December 2015 GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects November 3, 2015 Mr. David Weeks,AICP Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Small-Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Naples Bridge Center, Inc. Dear Mr.Weeks: Attached, please find copies of a small-scale Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment application for properties located at 5865 and 5845 Golden Gate Parkway. This amendment proposes to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to permit the existing and proposed conditional use on the 4.6±acre property. A companion Conditional Use Petition has been filed, which proposes to add approximately 2.3± acres from the E, Estates Zoning District to the existing Naples Bridge Center, Inc. site in order to expand the Naples Bridge Center facility. The pre-application meeting and fee have been waived per our 9/18/15 phone call. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, C D.Wayne Arnold,AICP c: Naples Bridge Center, Inc. GradyMinor File Q. Grady Minor&Associates,P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs,FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com t""\ Explanation/Justification for Proposed Amendment Naples Bridge Center,Inc. The proposed small-scale amendment proposes to create an exception to the prohibition on conditional uses for properties located on Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard for the Naples Bridge Center. The exception would recognize the property on which there is an existing conditional use for the Naples Bridge Center facility, and permit this non-profit group to seek conditional use approval on a 2.3±acre parcel adjacent to the existing facility, also owned by the Naples Bridge Center. In addition, the application proposes to create a map for inclusion in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan map series, which would identify the two existing properties which are not subject to the conditional use prohibition, and the addition of the property owned by the Naples Bridge Center. The amendment is necessary in order to permit the Naples Bridge Center(NBC)to seek a conditional use to increase the size of the existing Bridge Center building, and to permit parking, open space and water management facilities to be constructed on the adjacent Estates zoned property. The expansion of the existing Center will permit the Naples Bridge Center to continue to grow to meet the demands for additional members. The Naples Bridge Center was founded in 1976,has continually occupied the current property since that time, and has continued to see growth in memberships. The following graphic shows the increase in Table Count(the standard methodology used by American Contract Bridge League (ACBL) member bridge clubs to monitor annual growth or decline in membership and play at local clubs. Growth is anticipated to continue at historical levels. NBC Annual Table Count 2000-2014 12000 1.X)0:3 O U m 4 00 0 2033 3 2010 24131 2()2 2033 2004 2005 2105 2(27 2£128 2009 2010 2011 201.2 201..3 2014 Yea, The NBC membership includes residents of both Collier and Lee Counties as well as visiting members worldwide. The majority of the active members are from Collier County and are well-distributed throughout the coastal regions. Most of the Lee County members reside in the Bonita Springs and Estero areas; however, there are also a few members from other parts of Lee County. Because of the relatively low membership fee and low table fees, many people join several clubs to enable them to vary both the playing atmosphere and the people with whom they play. In addition, Naples is home to many snowbirds who are here for several weeks or months each year. Because of the length of time they are here, membership at such a low price is attractive so that they can pay the lower table fee. At all ACBL venues players play for"points" and do not play for money. At no time does any money change hands for winners or losers. The points determine their ranking compared to other bridge players. Currently, the NBC is the l31h largest bridge club in the United States. Because many members of the NBC are seasonal and because many play only sporadically, the large membership does not reflect the steady growth of the core players who reside year-round in the area. In addition to the NBC, there are several other bridge clubs located in Collier County. Aside from casual, neighborhood-based informal clubs, the other major bridge clubs in Collier County include the following: • Bridge Deck • St. Katherine's G.O. Church • Bonita Bridge(located in North Naples) The above three clubs are for-profit owner-operated entities. The NBC is the only member-owned club in Collier County not affiliated as an informal neighborhood-based club. The map below indicates the relative location of each of these other major bridge clubs with respect to the location of the NBC: Bonita Bridge Club(North Naples} a .r o a<r. s5,a+ri o.s Pw A4;¢� tarnh C s "rre aAC ,,,,is"m '�i St Katherine`s G.0.Char h�° max uny:��rs-ws Naples Bridge Center s war The Bridge Deck(St.Peters Church} wteway4ic Except for The Bridge Deck, which is housed in a shopping center strip in Nort h Naples, the others are housed in their respective churches. To the best of our knowledge and belief, none of these other clubs restricts membership or playing privileges to any specific geographical area. Travel to and from the NBC is facilitated by its easyu access to and from I-75 and the major north/south and east/west/arterials in Collier County. The NBC is used seven days per week. There are normally sessions every morning and afternoon except for Thursdays and Sundays which have only afternoon sessions. Each session typically lasts for about three hours. The morning session begins about 9:00 AM and the afternoon session begins about 1:00 PM. In addition, in season there are evening games on Tuesdays. Currently the morning sessions attract about 20-25 tables of four in the mornings and about 35-40 tables of four in the afternoons. In season, this number increases to about 30 tables in the morning and about 35 tables in the afternoons. Two-day tournaments (typically, Fridays and Saturdays) are held twice a year at the NBC. These tournaments attract bridge players from all over southwest Florida and from more distant part s of the state. Tournaments typically will have about 40-45 tables of four playing both morning and afternoon sessions. IIII II The NBC is in the process of applying for 501(c) 3 status as a non-profit educational and charitable organization. Typically, the NBC chooses at least one major charity each year to which a portion of all game proceeds for specific days are donated. The validation of the educational aspect of the NBC is seen in that the center holds lessons for new and advancing bridge players several times a week. In addition, the NBC sponsors classes for young players in the Collier County Public Schools to teach the game of bridge. Bridge has been shown to incorporate the skills of logic, mathematics, and deductive reasoning. Players,both young and old,can benefit from these skills. Inclusion of the adjacent parcel owned by the NBC will allow for more convenient parking for members and guests, by keeping parking in closer proximity to the Center. The companion Conditional Use application and master plan demonstrate the existing and proposed improvements for building expansion and parking improvements. The parcel for which only parking, open space and water management improvements are proposed, also permits the Naples Bridge Center to provide a minimum 30' wide buffer adjacent to the Estates zoned property immediately to the east. APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATOIN NUMBER DATE RECEIVED PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT This application,with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Department, Suite 400, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252-2400 (Fax 239-252-2946). The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant Naples Bridge Center Inc. Company Naples Bridge Center Inc. Address 5865 Golden Gate Parkway City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34116 Phone Number 239.455.4445 Fax Number B. Name of Agent* D.Wayne Arnold, AICP • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Q. Grady Minor and Associate, P.A. Address 3800 Via Del Rev City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34134 Phone Number 239-947-1144 Email warnold @gradyminor.com C. Name of Owner (s) of Record Naples Bridge Center Inc. Address 5865 Golden Gate Parkway City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34116 Phone Number 239.455.4445 Fax Number D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. Please see Exhibit I.D. II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL,Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). 1 Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, fist the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Naples Bridge Center Inc. 100% 5865 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples 34116 a non-profit membership Florida corporation Please see Exhibit V.G. C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Date of Contract: F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers,if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address 2 G. Date subject property acquired (1980 and 2015) leased ( ): Term of lease yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION The East 150' of Tract 75 and the West 150' of Tract 82, Unit 30, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 58, Public Records of Collier County, Florida B. GENERAL LOCATION The subject property is located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway approximately 2,500 feet east of Interstate 75 C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Golden Gate D. TAZ 193 E. SIZE IN ACRES 4.6± F. ZONING E, Estates G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN Residential,school, church H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S) Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Recreation/Open Space Traffic Circulation Sub-Element Mass Transit Sub-Element Aviation Sub-Element Potable Water Sub-Element Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element NGWAR Sub-Element Solid Waste Sub-Element Drainage Sub-Element Capital Improvement Element CCME Element Future Land Use Element X Golden Gate Master Plan Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S) 27 &28 OF THE Golden Gate Area Master Plan ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike through to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: Please see Exhibit IV.B. C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Residential Estates Designation 3 TO Conditional Use Subdistrict D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) E. DESCRIBE ADDITINAL CHANGES REQUESTED: Add new "Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions" map REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN 1"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit V.A. Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit V.A. Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exhibit V.A. Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit V.B. Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands,with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit V.C. Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BECONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE:THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Exhibit V.C. Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish &Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animalspecies known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biologicalcommunities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avianrookery, bird migratory route, etc.),Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D.GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2(Copies attached). 1. INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)(5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) Y/Y Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5%of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If 4 yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. N Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-1 1.007, F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit V.E Potable Water Exhibit V.E Sanitary Sewer Exhibit V.E.I.c Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS Golden Gate Parkway Exhibit V.E Drainage Exhibit V.E Solid Waste Exhibit V.E Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit V.E.2 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e.water,sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exhibit V.E Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools,fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Zone AH Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N/A Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable N/A Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Provided $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. 5 (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Exhibit V.G Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Exhibit V.G Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Provided 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1"=-400' or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. I'I 6 COPY EXHIBIT I . D. PROFF... SSR , L CONSULTANTS GradyMinor Civil-Engineers•Land Surveyors •..Planners • Landscape Architects Naples Bridge Center, Inc. Exhibit I.D. Professional Consultants Planning/Project Management: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239.947.1144 239.947.0375 fax warnold(a�gradyminor.com Transportation: Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PE Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 239-566-9551 - Office ntrebilcock @trebilcock.biz Environmental: Environmental Consultants, Inc. n Marco Espinar 3880 Estey Avenue Naples, FL 34104 (239) 263-2687 marcoe @prodigy.net D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Principal, Director of Planning Gi'adyMinol, Education Mr. Arnold is a Principal and co-owner of the firm and serves as the • Master of Urban Planning, Secretary/Treasurer and Director of Planning. As Director of Planning, Mr. University of Kansas, Arnold is responsible for and oversees services related to plan amendments, Lawrence property rezonings, expert witness testimony, ROW Acquisition, public • Bachelor of Science,Urban participation facilitation, and project management. Mr. Arnold previously and Regional served as the Planning Services Director at Collier County, where he oversaw Planning/Geography, the County's zoning, comprehensive planning, engineering, platting and Missouri State University Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) functions. Mr. Arnold also has Professional Registrations/ prior Florida planning experience with Palm Beach County Government and Affiliations the South Florida Water Management District. • American Institute of Mr. Arnold has been accepted as an expert in land planning matters in local and Certified Planners(MCP) state proceedings. • American Planning Association(APA) • Urban Land Institute,S.W. Florida Chapter,Board of Relevant Projects Directors 1996 • Collier County Rural Fringe • Collier County Growth Management Plan Committee,Chairman, 1999 • Marco Island Master Plan • Collier County Streetscape • Immokalee Area Master Plan Ad hoc Committee, 1999 • Collier County Land Development Code • Leadership Collier,Class of 2000 • Logan Boulevard Right-of-Way Acquisition Planning Analysis • Bonita Springs Chamber of • U.S. 41 Right-of-Way Expansion Planning Analysis Commerce Government • Copeland Zoning Overlay Affairs Committee • Collier County Government Center Development of Regional Impact(DRI) • Collier Building Industry • Winding Cypress DRI Association,Board of • Pine Ridge/Goodlette Road Commercial Infill District Directors • Lely Lakes PUD Rezoning • Collier County Jr.Deputy • Henderson Creek Planned Development/Growth Management Plan League,Inc.,Board of Directors Amendment • Orangetree (Settlement Area) Growth Management Plan Amendment • Mercato Mixed Use Planned Development • North Point DRI/MPD • Vornado RPUD r • Orange Blossom Ranch MPD ----z: • Palermo Cove RPD Q. Grady Minor&Associates, P.A. Civil Engineers•Surveyors•Land Planners•Landscape Architects RESUME Marco A. Espinar Bilingual: English& Spanish 3880 Estey Avenue Office: 239-263-2687 Naples,Fl 34104 Home 239-263-2747 EDUCATION Cardinal Mooney High School Diploma 1980 Sarasota, Florida Manatee Junior College AA Degree 1982 Bradenton, Florida Biology University of South Florida BS Degree 1990 Tampa,Florida Biology Completed USF Cooperative Education Program April 1988 USF Undergraduate Research -USF 1985 Apalachicola Archaeological Expedition&Research - Lab Coordinator of Fauna Identification from Archeological Sites - Studies of Seagrass Beds (Thalassia testudinum) in Upper Tampa Bay, Florida - Growth Rates of Marine Algae ( Gracilaria tikvahiae, G. verrucosa, G. deblis) Port Manatee, Florida EMPLOYMENT HISTORY & EXPERIENCE Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. Owner&Environmental Planning/ Naples, Florida 2/96 -Present Biologist Environmental Permitting, Planning Exotic Plant Removal/Poisoning Vegetation Inventory Mitigation Plantings Mitigation&Monitoring Plans Jurisdictional Determination Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Environmental Impact Statements Licensed Agent Gopher Tortoise Permitting, Red Cockaded Woodpecker Survey Testing, Relocation UMAM Analysis BP-Natural Resource Advisor- Deepwater Horizon MS Canyon 252 Oil Spill Gulfport, Mississippi -Dauphin Island,Alabama- Pensacola, Florida Turrell & Associates,Inc. Senior Environmental Planner Naples, Florida 2/94 - 12/95 Environmental Permitting, Planning Supervision of Staff Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Review Staff Reports Environmental Impact Statements South Florida Water Management District Environmental Analyst Fort Myers, Florida 2/93 - 8/93 Dredge&Fill Permit Review Surface Water Permit Review Collier County Government, Development Services Environmental Specialist II Naples,Florida 10/90—2/93 Site Development Plan Compliance Landscape Inspections Planned Unit Development Compliance Environmental Enforcement Site Drainage Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District Field Services Technician Tampa, Florida 9/87— 10/90 As-Built Inspections of Storm Water System-Engineering, Survey Surface and Ground Water Permit Compliance Well Construction&Abandonment Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District (CO-OP)Environmental Scientists 1 Brooksville,Florida 1/86 - 9/87 Wetland Vegetation Studies At Major Well Fields Water Quality Sampling& Testing PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals,Member Elected to First Governing Board and served 2 terms, served on Bylaws Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on the Collier County Environmental Advisory Board Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Currently Serving on the Development Services Advisory Committee - Environmental Chair Currently Serving on the Land Development Code Sub-Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee 6 years Served as Chairman of the Conservation Collier Lands Evaluation and Management Sub- Committee, Award for Ten(10)years of my Voluntary Service to Collier County By the Board of County Commissioners Awarded Outstanding Advisory Member Award- February 2009 by Collier County Board of County Commissioners Gopher Tortoise Management and Mitigation Professional Training Program Successful Completion 9/01 REFERENCES UPON REQUEST Norman J. Trebilcock,AICP, P.E. T ebH cosh President,Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, P.A. plitfiirsl Eaninterint Education Rattlesnake Hammock Rd.(CR 864)-2-mile reconstruction converting M.E.in Public Works,University of Florida,1988 existing 2-lane rural section to a 4-lane urban section. Traffic B.S.in Civil Engineering,University of Miami,1987 operations design included sidewalks, signing, pavement marking, channelization,lighting,and signalization.Project was characterized as Professional Registration/Certifications a difficult design relative to existing utilities and constrained right-of- Professional Engineer,Florida,#47116 way conditions.Innovative water management design is credited with Certified Planner,American Institute of Certified Planners saving nearly$1 million in right-of-way acquisition costs. Certification,FDOT Advanced Work Zone Traffic Control Vanderbilt Beach Road(CR 862)-2.1-mile 4-lane of new construction Professional Affiliations urban highway extension with provisions for 6-laning.Traffic operations American Planning Association design included sidewalks, signing, pavement marking, channelization, American Institute of Certified Planners lighting,and signalization.From concept to concrete project,completed American Society of Civil Engineers in less than half the time (6 vs. 13 years) compared to statewide Florida Engineering Society experience with similar complex highway projects. Successfully Institute of Transportation Engineers permitted alignment through Cocohatchee Strand wetland system, Illuminating Engineering Society avoiding building a bridge originally identified by permitting agencies: Society of American Military Engineers savings over$2 million. Professional Experience Ben Hill Griffin Parkway - 3.4-mile 4-lane new construction urban Mr. Trebilcock directs plan production, design development & highway with provisions for 6 lanes in Lee County.Traffic operations permitting efforts on public works and private sector projects.Offering design included sidewalks,signing,pavement marking,channelization, over 23 years of professional experience, he specializes in and signalization. Reliever highway to 1-75 serves the main access to transportation engineering, including highway design, utility Florida Gulf Coast University. relocation, drainage design, street lighting, signalization, access management and permitting projects. He prepares and reviews traffic Airport Pulling Road(CR 31)-Between CR 886 and CR 896(2 miles),6 impact statements and related reports,and he has been certified by laning.Traffic operations design included sidewalks,signing,pavement the Florida Department of Transportation in several transportation marking,channelization,and lighting. areas. Mr. Trebilcock manages team members and various subconsultants through contract negotiations, preliminary Consulting Engineering Services engineering,permitting,final design,and construction administration. • Coordinated and spearheaded the joint pond agreement He has attended numerous transportation seminars, and has held successfully executed for the Marbella Lakes project with the leadership positions on many transportation-related task forces and in FDOT as part of the 1-75 6-laning expansion currently under professional societies. construction.This agreement helped the FDOT avoid a potentially adverse pond site acquisition and resulted in a win-win conclusion. Public Works Director;City of Marco Island(1998-2000) • South Florida Water Management District surface water • Established the First Public Works Operation for the City management permit assistance on more than 40 residential, (population 30,000). commercial,institutional and highway projects totaling over 3,000 • Successfully transferred services within 30 days (i.e. parks and acres. Relevant projects include Aster Court Outfall replacement, recreation, streets and drainage, bridges, waterways, land Bald Eagle Drainage improvements, and Westlake Outfall Pipe development permitting,and beautification). Improvement replacements. • Developed master plans and multi-year capital improvements • Drainage analysis for Olde Florida Golf Club rural access road(1.2 programs for Public Works. miles) and Whippoorwill Lane (1 mile). Whippoorwill Lane • Secured City's first storm water quality improvement grant from included sidewalk reconstruction and connectivity. the SFWMD. • Provided technical expertise for transportation issues affecting • Established successful privatization program for efficient delivery land development projects including Pelican Marsh, Pelican Bay, of services. Lely and Grey Oaks communities. • Initiated citywide signalization,sidewalk and bridge improvement • Designed street lighting system for Woodlands CDD, Airport programs. Pulling Road,Golden Gate Parkway,Vanderbilt Beach Road, and Airport-Pulling Road intersection with Davis Blvd. Consulting Transportation engineering and design services on the • Designed arterial roadway signalization systems for 20 locations in following high-profile roadway projects: Southwest Florida, including mast arm and concrete strain pole installations. Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) - Managed the planning study for • FDOT Conceptual Access permits for the Northeast Commercial Golden Gate Parkway/Airport Road Grade Separated Overpass. Also Area at Pelican Bay,Naples International Park,and Pelican Marsh managed the design up to 60% plans for the 3-mile reconstruction PUD. converting a 4-lane rural section to a 6-lane urban section. Traffic operations design includes sidewalks, signing, pavement marking, channelization, lighting, and signalization. Key coordination element was integrating design into proposed 1-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA 1205 Piper Boulevard,Suite 202•Naples,FL 34110•Phone 239-566-9551•FAX 239-566-9553 www.treblcock.biz COPY EXHIBIT IV. B. AND IV. E. PROPOSED GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TEXT AND MAP GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors.• Planners•Landscape Architects a Golden Gate Area Master Plan Exhibit IV.B Amended Language Revise Text on Page 27 and 29 of the GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Words underlined are additions;words struck oug:are deletions Revised 01/29/2016 Golden Gate Area Master Plan (VI)(X) 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses,one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: (VI)(XVI) a) Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G.of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are defined as: • electric or gas generating plants, • effluent tanks, • major re-pump stations, • sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, • hospitals and hospices, • water aeration or treatment plants, (XVI) • governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), • public water supply acquisition,withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and • public safety service facilities,and other similar facilities. (VI)(VIII) b) Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Boulevard Special Provisions: (XVI) • Conditional uses shall not be permitted on those parcels immediately adjacent to the west side of Collier Boulevard within the Estates Designated Area except where the parcel is directly bounded by conditional uses on two(2) or more side yards with no intervening rights-of-ways or waterways; and, except as provided in subparagraph 2., below; and, except for essential services, as described in paragraph a),above. (XII)(XVI) • Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the 1-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, there shall be no further conditional uses for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict; except as provided in paragraph 3(b)3, below; and, except as provided in subparagraph 1., below; and, except for essential services,as described in paragraph a), above. (XVI) • Further, no properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway, between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard, shall be approved for conditional uses except as permitted within the Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict; and, except as provided in subparagraph 1., below; and, except for essential services, as described in paragraph a), above. This provision shall not be construed to affect the area described in Paragraph a), above. (VIII)(XVI) 1. In consideration of the improvements associated with the interchange at Interstate 75 and Golden Gate Parkway, the existing conditional use (church and related facilities) located at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Parkway and 66th Street S.W. may be expanded in acreage and intensity along the south side of Golden Gate Parkway to the east of 66th Street S.W., but the total project area shall not exceed approximately 9.22 acres(see Golden Gate Parkway Interchange Conditional Uses Area Map). (XVI)=Plan Amendment by Ordinance No.2008-59 on October 14,2008 27 Words underlined are additions;words st-Fuelf-threogb ore deletions Revised 01/29/2016 Golden Gate Area Master Plan 2. The parcel located immediately south of the Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict, on the west side of Collier Boulevard, and at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, shall be eligible for a transitional conditional use designation. 3. Conditional use for expansion of the existing educational and charitable social organization (Naples Bridge Center) is allowed on the east 150 feet of Tract 75 and the west 150 feet of Tract 82, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates. The maximum building area permitted on the two parcels shall be limited to 15,000 square feet. Use of Tract 82 shall be limited to parking, water management and open space uses. See Conditional Uses Subdistrict: Golden Gate Parkway Special Provisions map. (VI) c) Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions: Conditional uses shall be allowed immediately adjacent to designated Neighborhood Centers subject to the following criteria: 1. Properties eligible for conditional uses shall abut the arterial or collector road serving the Neighborhood Center, 2. Such uses shall be limited to transitional conditional uses that are compatible with both residential and commercial such as churches, social or fraternal organizations, childcare centers,schools,and group care facilities, 3. All conditional uses shall make provisions for shared parking arrangements with adjoining developments whenever possible, 4. Conditional uses abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75-foot buffer of native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted, 5. Conditional uses adjoining the commercial uses within Neighborhood Centers shall, whenever possible, share parking areas, access and curb cuts with the adjoining commercial use, in order to facilitate traffic movement. (VI) d) Transitional Conditional Uses: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between existing non-residential and residential areas. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a buffer between non-residential and residential areas. The following criteria shall apply for Transitional Conditional Use requests: • Site shall be directly adjacent to a non-residential use(zoned or developed); • Site shall be 2.25 acres, or more, in size or be at least 150 feet in width and shall not exceed 5 acres; • Conditional uses shall be located on the allowable acreage adjacent to the non- residential use; • Site shall not be adjacent to a church or other place of worship, school, social or fraternal organization, child care center, convalescent home, hospice, rest home, home for the aged, adult foster home,children's home, rehabilitation centers;and • Site shall not be adjacent to parks or open space and recreational uses; • Site shall not be adjacent to permitted Essential Service, as identified in Section 2.6.9 of the Land Development Code,except for libraries and museums;and • Project shall provide adequate buffering from adjacent properties allowing residential uses. (VI)=Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2003-44 on September 10,2003 28 Words underlined are additions;words struck `rough are deletions Revised 01/29/2016 EXHIBIT IV.E CONDITIONAL USE SUBDISTRICT: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SPECIAL PROVISIONS Collier County, Florida Fir Fie/ PINE RIDGE ROAD A A re, rjogro„,.:., . • AllA A o 0 GOLDEN GATE ARKWAY m • r r A z � I z J J d RADIO ROAD 0 a a I DAVIS BOULEVARD EXT. LEGEND GOLDEN GATE CONDITIONAL USE / ESTATES EXCEPTIONS I I I 0 1/2 MI. 1 MI. COPY EXHIBIT V.A. LAND USE GradyMinor Civil Engineers • band Surveyors• Planners • Landscape Architects .,.. ..d is J: :N .•41 N J .b�. - 1 .•1. M H- sa n yam ' w .< f ' pt ' e a O SO arm N i® - �V >e 1-� w m....-, CS = p Q X W W W W fi- cK autuaara W K ,Z lii 2 F OdJ t/] W W a W [R1tE W F- W> Z W Z N� I J 2111 }} I V ; w W f' OUI gg ly t� m § s O - d 00 �;. a may _ �� ti I re N _ -c m J g Z W r C • au tli W W WW C. �::1111 W ZO� ,17 Q R" s x Iii 3 y. la '' ' $ p q KK ; y b t-�' ,rev V �, "' �� 3��`r��zi�� nom - ��r�� .... �"' : ,.a,,.1,,,--„,..,,i,,, yr �� zzrW x k. „` �� zZrnw 0 ' .a�,> ' NiF=mow wow—a `'- fA (AO�yKO O z .> .,w FN!-tqm J x z Q f W CO W U LTi �« wraw�a0 a a a a s ' _ 3 9 � f u IA VJ fA a 2 s tj a aS : ..Q W W W Z Z Z 2 Z o 11i 0 z g a w w w w �' @.� � + ?' - r W Z] 111 "/`. •.:a O_ to 0 WK wK WZ wrc g • f” - c ''I O N 1i 7 p' s ,-o ;, ,- ' ;a z z z a z z a` s ; P U W C7 C7 U' C7 O ' .+.^. w u~-1N x C-' S Z x2 Z Z a- ' A ' .•}' _ ' "�-+ X X X a x'2 111 F Z W 1,17)0e3 1'Z LLI 7 m W W W -a O O Vl O 0 Vl O D W U) a Z N 0 NNO 1QN7 3N0 K COPY EXHIDIT V. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION GradyMinor Civil Engineers• Land Surveyors.• Planners • Landscape Architects EXHIBIT V.B. EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP LEGEND — MRBALLDEBBRIML ESTATES DDIONA ICN Aw CUUNRALJNIRAL DESCNARCN •.N We NSW! NO It OMIT 0.)....1101•01t MA 111001 �1 02.00.1.11001010110=° �„ GOLDEN GATE AREA 1010 am RINIONam°��•.� ® °"i' °= FUTURE LAND USE MAP 00•00104.MEW ,_▪ El MUMMY CIMIMIL EMMA 13 670:• '°. f��..t"laIemu 0—fl—..Newa.NN.r 0It NM MOm NF an= IYYOKALFE ROAD ®wawa wawa larem1...... ▪ORM�.ao m.aNa ❑IN NN.w - Nu etia MOM NO MD ME MUM!w•so =AM Sr x.amo o Am•.1N run. I to Ey DIL WELL ROAD V▪- 5 I) I- 3 m YYgCALEE ROAD RANDALL BOULEVARD P. Ri _ VA DERBILT BEACH ROAD `5. a g GOLDEN GATE ,--'--yep BOULEVARD `Z` K (I PINE ItICE RD. IYFf7E BLVD.. J t' • < r ; F o 4eI_`• . - m 2 m 12 t m )N�+sTA,,_, S.R.K i z N.PROJECT LOCATION i DAMS BOULEVARD GOLDEN GATE ESTATES S.R. W - B4 0 4.6±ACRES-NAPLES a BRIDGE CENTER,INC. mom --- W U) § a 1= wawa. _. o qs B d I 011111311110 — mom W GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP NVim- 1W'..Mw NOMm-tm••w 4 Nfl ..... AMMO,- WY n tan OWL M.a•N-T B.:- I AINOo- OCIOa 14 2008 0111111011Mr i a - ..11L,INS m 101.ZONE - 111.1'V.MN M101010/ - ALLY a mM OM NS NS. Mil 1n MOM - A/•L it MM MEMO - ALT 1S 1010 as O 1100-32 .- 00001017I aw MNN - WWII 14 NS LN awl A11100111 - OC101011 0.57 OIL 110. a... ~ a - Na 14 INS Nom- •N•n IL r wawa... AII NOON- Ma1SWA a MN - NM Nam—11.01 It mw .Mil MM. MOM- WY 14 5 _ AMMO - STNwe1 n ama SCALE - m NS NOUN MIMED MP 1t a feel 0 1 10. 2 IB. 3 III. 4 I%. 3 ML MEMO- aN10.111 a MG m Nn aeN-a rmAINO Sx cisft.,Immo SEC= NOM 014111011/waMNM M NOMMEN MEN=-asl•Sr a a7 RE aMfIFaM ER IA 110W-M WOG S/1NI LwI I R 26E I R27E R28E I copy .. .. /"." EXHIBIT V. C. ENVIRONMENTAL GradyMinor Civil Engine= s • Land S eyors • Planners • Landscape Architects 3.08.00 Environmental Data 1)Purpose As per requirements in LDC Sections 3,08.00 and questions in the CU Checklist 2)Preparation Of Environmental Data Qualifications of Environmental Consultant are included as Exhibit# I Environmental Data.The following shall be submitted where applicable to evaluate projects. a. Wetlands I) Identify on Current Aerial/FLUCFCS A FLUCFCS map and vegetation inventory has been included for the existing Naples Bridge Club Inc and the proposed additional property.The site has no Jurisdictional Wetlands on site. The parcel consists of disturbed Mixed Hardwoods. The parcel consists primarily of Brazilian pepper with a Slash and ear-leaf acacia canopy.The ground cover is very sparse. b. Listed Species ■•-■ i) Provide Survey Wildlife Listed Species Study (LDC10.02.3.A.2.m) A brief examination of the parcel found no listed vertebrates on site. The parcel is located in the urban area. ii) Provide Listed Plants identified in LDC Section 3.04.03 The only plant species identified were a few species of Tillandsia spp. See Attached Vegetation List FLUCCS Code Map iii)Wildlife Management Plans in accordance with LDC Section 3.04.00 See Attached Listed Species Study,No wildlife management plans should be required. C) Native Vegetation Preservation i) For Sites or Portions of Sites Cleared of Native Vegetation or in Agricultural Use: Not Applicable P"'■ ` ii) Identify on a current aerial the acreage,location and community typ es of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site.... Location Maps/Aerials (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.xn) Aerials and location maps have been provided. The site consists of approximately 4.68 acres and is located in Section 29. Township 49, Range 26; Collier County, Florida.The parcel is located approximately .5 mile east of the intersection of 1-75 and Golden Gate Parkway. Golden Gate Parkway borders the parcel along its southern property line.The dominant vegetation on site consists of Slash pine, ear leaf acacia,cabbage palm with dense midstory of Brazilian pepper. The canopy varies with exotics such as ear-leaf acacia and Melaleuca.The native vegetation consists of trees such as Slash pine,cypress and live oaks. The site does have some recognition of a greater past.The exotics have severely impacted this parcel. See Attached Location Maps,Vegetation Maps/FLUCCS Maps Native Vegetation Calculation (LDC3.05.07.A.) 2.69 acres has been calculated as Native Habitat that would equal to .27 acres of preserve based on a required preservation of 10%of Native vegetation on site. Clearly identify the location of all preserves. The preserve area has been identified on the CU plan. Created Preserves and Retained Preserves will meet the minimum width requirement as per LDC 3.05.07.H. 1 e. Retained preservation shall be selected based on criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3 Principle Structures shall be located'a minimum of 25 feet from the boundary of the preserve Soil Ground Water Sampling Provided Urban Lands ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATIONS t-1 RESUME Marco A.Espinar Bilingual: English & Spanish 3880 Estey Avenue Office: 239-263-2687 Naples,Fl 34104 Home 239-263-2747 EDUCATION Cardinal Mooney High.School Diploma 1980 Sarasota. 1 Manatee Junior College AA L7egree 1982 Bradenton,Florida Biology University of South Florida BS Degree 1990 Tampa,Florida; Biology Completed USF Cooperative Education Program April 1988 USF Undergraduate Research, -USF 1985 Apalachicola Archaeological Expedition&Research -Lab Coordinator of Fauna Identification from Archeological Sites - Studies of Seagrass Beds(Tl ulassia testudinunt)in Upper Tampa Bay,Florida -Growth Rates of Marine Algae( Gracilaria tikvahiae, G. verrucosa, G. deblis) Port Manatee, Florida EMPLOYMENT HISTORY&EXPERIENCE Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. Owner&Environmental Planning/ Naples,Florida 2/96-Present Biologist Environmental Permitting,Planning Exotic Plant Removal/Poisoning Vegetation Inventory Mitigation Plantings Mitigation&Monitoring Plans Jurisdictional Determination Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Environmental Impact Statements Licensed Agent Gopher Tortoise Permitting, Red Cockaded Woodpecker Survey Testing,Relocation UMAM Analysis BP-Natural Resource Advisor- Deepwater Horizon MS Canyon 252 Oil Spill Gulfport, Mississippi-Dauphin Island,Alabama-Pensacola,Florida n Turrell& Associates,Inc. Senior Environmental Planner Naples,Florida 2/94 - 12/95 Environmental Permitting,Planning Supervision of Staff Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Review Staff Reports Environmental Impact Statements South Florida Water Management District Environmental Analyst Fort Myers,Florida 2/93 - 8/93 Dredge,&Fill Permit Review Surface Water Permit Review Collier County Government,Development Services Environmental Specialist II Naples,Florida 10/90—2/93 Site Development Plan Compliance Landscape Inspections Planned Unit Development Compliance Environmental Enforcement Site Drainage Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District Field Services Technician Tampa,Florida 9/87— 10/90 As-Built Inspections of Storm Water System-Engineering,Survey Surface and Ground Water Permit Compliance Well Construction&Abandonment Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District (CO-OP)Environmental Scientists 1 Brooksville, Florida 1/86 -9/87 Wetland Vegetation Studies At Major Well Fields Water Quality Sampling&Testing PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Southwest Florida'Association of Environmental Professionals,Member Elected to First Governing Board and served 2 terms, served on Bylaws Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on the Collier County Environmental Advisory Board Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Currently Serving on the Development Services Advisory Committee Currently Serving on the Land Development Code Sub-Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee 6 years Served as Chaitu an.of the Conservation Collier Lands Evaluation and Management Sub Committee, Award for Ten(10)years of my Voluntary Service to Collier County By the Board of County Commissioners Awarded Outstanding Advisory Member Award-February 2009 by Collier County Board of County Commissioners Gopher Tortoise Management and Mitigation Professional Training Program Successful Completion 9/01 REFERENCES UPON REQUEST LOCATION MAPS i ` '„ . - i a p : ^^'^ co s .n dsA53;80FI °,@%.1x�,...,. ;.:qc. 'r..� 3e»' _ .n . ., .«.,pt ;e . _" s r , s 1 t§ t .. _, v a — 1 I 3 A b 'P . JJ $4 s- . .„„ t w : f a I I a t ;', J € (} y I J - i-£ ES ci„a t9 f 6. 5!> an ( "'Y • I 0 6.4.; ., ! i _ ...... a /".""*\ . -- S Fs SA t U• N •c 2. $ • - ti.. h sm : 2, �, s D _ u• o to 6l _ .c ' [i 1f ,', • a _ x• • O ,'� .Cir<.. _r3a—'�i�i!jirdi!}jt ."'1�,1 '. ' 'a�F-� „,„.7S' ra F @ is ,;� .. . ID a I _ iff • ' ' 7:1111J-i-: '- � 5. - - - -mss.. .... }-tia _- --- -- -- - ----- Li ! t7 li t N O.< u; c o ;, cam y in _m Q 1,.., CA Cl —I I 0 Z E-1<k\--->Z tat SOILS COLLIER COUNTY SOIL LEGEND REVISED 1/90 H. YAMATAKI HYDRIC H 2 HOLOPAW FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM H 3 MALABAR FS, H 4 CHOBEE, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND DANIA MUCKS DEPRESSIONAL H 6 RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM-COPELAND FS 7 IMMOKALEE FS 8 MYAKKA FS 10 OLDSMAR FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM 11 HALLANDALE FS H PINEDA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM 15 POMELLO FS 16 OLDSMAR FS H 17 BASINGER FS H 18 RIVIERA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM 20 FT. DRUM AND MALABA HIGH.. FS 21 BOCA FS H II 22 CHOBEE, WINDER AND GATOR SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL H 23 HOLOPAW AND OKEELANTA SOILS DEPRESSIONAL 25 BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS DEPRESSIONAL H 27 HOLOPAW FS H 28 PINEDA AND RIVIERA FS 29 WABASSO FS H 31 HILOLO LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, JUPITER AND MARGATE SOILS 32 URBAN LAND 33 URBAN LAND HOLOPAW BASINGER COMPLEX 34 URBAN LAND IMMOKALEE OLDSMAR LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM COMPLEX 35 URBAN LAND AQUENTS COMPLEX ORGANIC SUBSTRATUM 36 UDORTHENTS SHAPED 37 TUSCA.WILLA FS 38 URBAN LAND MATLACHA LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM BOCA COMPLEX 39 SATELLITE FS H 40 DURBIN- AND WULFERT MUCKS 41 URBAN LAND SATELLITE COMPLEX 42 CANAVERAL. BEACHES ASSOCIATION H 43 WINDER, RIVIERA; LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND - CHOBEE SOILS DEPRESSIONAL 45 PAOLA. FS (1-8 percent slopes) • H 48 PENNSUCCO SOIL (marl prairie) H 49 HALLANDALE AND BOCA FS (slough) 50 OCHOPEE FSL, PRAIRIE (marl) 51 OCHOPEE FSL H H 52 KESSON MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED 53 ESTERO AND PECKISH SOILS FREQUENTLY FLOODED H 54 JUPITER BOCA COMPLEX H 56 BASINGER FS, OCCASIONALLY FLOODED C s - n N •9. O u y J_ . a m W s ._ ,--1,-," 8 11..4 iii 2 :1. .. --F• --- x C 3 " fi * F F at. ate''. & .`..a - : ta - is d fl u 'mo w'° - &1 ,ZT *' a e i.. m Ili n`«._• 8 C . 1 . o f.n 0 =k- m ° 9 co z c roe ;3, u w . m (I) 0 lilt W,!..,,, .",ttiM., 'tt- t Alt.:,,,„:.i,.t,:;:',„*t--ttt‘te,*,.. ,,,T7t3-,i3:,,,IAt3,4,‘,,,,,,,w,,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,:,:, 33--—--:— -- ptt,v4,4-,-PtFft:T:tt-.t!tilt,t:ft'S. '' °'--°,it-,t't- f i ' 14' - f ` " �. i A A.," ,hr t " . / 19 ° C 33/ t _ ,. _ ,i r j 1 J .\ ,........_- o I / 3 Y�. 1 36 '\ 2 ( f) 21 I i,. //', \], � � d i �8 -� � '\ 3y\ (....--"- a. 21 i 33 1 �'t .„,...____,/ 1 i --. , \s -.2., 9 / 1--'''61 ; if/7 -----'-iv,i_ti,t,,, ,,,N,.._ \\,... , „,,, ,.I �� t (-------) .. ,,. , 3.8 ,0 2:....„ ) . tom--�., 33 , \ .,... (/„... ,,,_, t 2 21 nK (.. t c` `� - v2 1 3/4 1/2 1/4 Q5 1 VEGETATION / FLUCCS MAP FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) Common.Name Scientific Name Indicator Status 121 Single Family Homes 171 Pre-School 172 Church 438 Mixed Hardwoods Upland This is the largest natural habitat within this project. The species composition consists of both wetland and upland plant species. The area does NOT meet the criteria as defined for Jurisdictional.Wetlands. The area is severely drained and impacted by the presence of exotics.The midstory is almost impenetrable with Brazilian pepper and a canopy of ear- leaf acacia. In addition to the dense midstory of exotics,the entire area has a dense entanglement of vines. This dense midstory has limited diversity of the ground cover. The area does give hints of its past. Such native species as Slash pines, cypress and cabbage palms are present. Slash pine Pinus elliotti FACW Cp,D ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculifvrmis Exotic Cp,M,C carrotwood Cupaniopsis anacardioides Exotic M,O Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthfblius Exotic M,C Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC M,C Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL Cp,M,D palmetto Serona repens FACU G,O Laurel oak Quercus laurifalia FACW Cp,O Strangler fig Ficus aurea FAC M,O Myrsine Myrsine jloridana FAC M,C/G,C Beauty bush Callicarpa Americana UPL M,O Dahoon holly Ilex cassine OBL M,O wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC± M,O Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- G,O Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU G,O Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL M,O Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia FAC G.O Cat-briar Smilax spp. FAC G,C Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans FAC G,O Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC G,C Florida Trema Trema spp. FAC M,O Chocolate weed Melochia corchorfolia; FAC G,C t". Dewberries Ruhus spy: FAC G.0 snowber C'hioc c cea aruifo1iu UPL G,O Beggers ticks Bidens a/ba FACW G,O Ragweed Ambrosia artemissiifblia FACU G,C 1896 Recreational' Bridge Center 814 Roads and Highways 1 ABREVIATIONS Canopy(Cp),Midstory (M), Ground Cover(G) Dominant(D),Common(C),Occasional(0) INDICATOR STATUS- Obligate(OBL),Facultative wet plants(FACW), Facultative plants(FAC),Upland(UPL) Epiphytic Plants Wild Pines Stiff- leaved Tillandsiafasiculata FDA/C Recurved T. balbisiana FDAJT wired-leaved T setacea FDAIT • • FLUCFCS CQDES :CODE DESCR1PT4ON AC_ 2 139 `1h ,RAID f:`1 ;tAVAR' t:: 0 0.5' SCALE: 1' =1' 438 • --- i _ 3 438 121 1896 i a i ( 1 814 121 1: 172 NAPLES BRIBCE CENTER fl.Cradr ltowr awn.#csai.:tn P Mk 03 t tttca( itiltll' Iuari IAr.itc nwriew h71 C5S • L.# Sun.P Planners • La6tl w :FArchitects Uy C J MAP Om M.M.EB0.G5"1 fir Web LF U0030# M-ww::�.f?WM'.K5 ryL xae[F se,4-:rte F.•. wC.. !Mn"L www.{•Y)dY'Tirur .... .................F.... r...., FarF lhmr:.�3.&89.i386 5w8F" CP LL� ZONED,S.ESI,.€ES USE PESICrZ T IIL /'\ C „,,,,e,,.,£E;s 1,1. 4 .,_n . u£"F_W.P t3 1 _I GU�ILDiN' k a. EXISTING 11' DE 6 - { LANDSCAPE ' ' 30•WIDE BUPPER 1,,. VEGETATED t.` SLIPPER II ZONED.E,ESTATES I I 4 ZONED:5,ESTATES USE, RESIDENTIAL USE P.ESIDENT AL II i 1 ,K,:-,-;:' ,�j f 1 k:=1,.:,,,471,:," ,' I a 6e I PROPOSED ;. II !EXPANSION {yI I 1Ih �t` -i I i £X{STri,4 {{iNPPLES BP�I"'}E G _ r (E(1 CEi�I TER - I ,- _ v 1 II - - - - t II i \_ — — H I .� ' 25'WIDE TYPE'0` I . _ ---- a LANDSCAPE I BUFFER I GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SITE SUMMARY NOTES: TOTAL SITE AREA 4.58±ACRES ; f (MUM BUILDING AREA: 15,000 SQUARE FEET 1. ALL Ord-SITE 1 ISfITING SHALL BE SHIELDED AND DIRECTED I AWAY FROM ADJOINING PROPERTIES. PRESERVE. REQUIRED.027±ACRESI2,SST ACRES NATIVE 7 SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION SHALL UTILIZE VEGETATION X ii:-€o) CURB---SIDE PICK-UP. NO DUMPSTERS WILL BE LOCATED irwo PROVIDED:0.50±ACRES ON-Sl T E. , r ^ SCALE:1' ' >�ce;tiu NAPLES RRPDGE CENTER INC. Gr.1LIT£ ILL r CONOOIONN USE 'C.7.7, " "° DATA C OtL NC_PL.T I2UL0Y.SPtiIITE.. Li A N Z UIS ss.. ' _,LiU C C^I3KR CCS1N?"PPOPERT':RPPRNSER a. em ,amp wr, ARCHAELOGICAL 1 HISTORICAL RESOURCES \s, This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute (STOP project review.This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information. October 14,2015 Marco A. Espinar Collier Environmental Consultants Inc 3880 Estey Avenue Naples Florida 34104 E-mail: marcoe@prodiov.net In response to your inquiry of October 14, 2015 the Florida Master Site File lists no archeological sites, and no other cultural resources found at the following parcel of Collier County,Florida T49S R26E Section 29 as submitted with the search request. When interpreting the results of our search,please consider the following information: • This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites,historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. • Because vandalism and looting are common at Florida sites,we ask that you limit the distribution of location information on archaeological sites. • While many of our records document historically significant resources,the documentation of a resource at the Florida Master Site File does not necessarily mean the resource is historically significant. • Federal,state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review.If your project falls under these laws,you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, El-Ilan M.Vovsi Historical Data Analyst, BASF LAI\ON, ,c?t,DO.S.N lyP londa,corn 500 South Bmneugh.Street • Tallahassee,FL 32399-0250 • wwwiThentage.cornipreservationisitefile 850.245.6440 ph I 850.245..6439 fax SiteFile@dos.statc fl us ••. .� .4 ,°"� ` ' e-4-.4..'' 4 . k I.hG�.NI.i 4tr Y fl'''''' .. -^rt 3 a; �Y 6� is t.' t''. 4".F .w r-4•14'4 �. .. ,s �, .m.,4 �' "` # ",u-v ay., R , � r x _•`Vi! µ - •A r ✓x> jt :- --.'" __-. 3/a _ �" r O,z'i-„ .�}� ,,�.t't iii "c r •- c 4 1 • of • • • I it b j } - - a�; - - _ _ - ..�, ` y' • Y - _ • •ii . ” - , '• • lG.nt �.v,6L - k_:1'.4-f.:11•,.:4.:., . ;&:4,-;,..:,,:••., -:44.4.+1''«" _$w.r+. •. u': a;i ';;i ... '.�.. «N.-}, a.- , . - • sN wI • b ;.` <f - •• ... 4 z ... • LISTED SPECIES SURVEY l \ I Introduction/Purpose This report is an account of a brief Listed Species survey recently performed on a 2.34 acre tract called the Bridge Center Inc. The total site is approximately 4.68 acres consisting of the existing Naples Bridge Center and the proposed parcel to be developed in conjunction with the Naples Bridge Center. Required to meet county review requirements,its purpose is to identify and describe key habitats and report any listed species using the site that would be at risk due to possible future development actions on the site This survey and report is based on fieldwork performed during September 2015. H Site Description The site consists of approximately 4.68 acres. This examination was for the new expansion of 2.34 acres. The additional 2.34 acres are located in Section 29. Township 49,Range 26, in Collier County,Florida.The parcel is located approximately .5 miles east of the intersection of 1-75 and Golden Gate Parkway. Golden Gate Parkway borders the subject parcel along its southern property line. The dominant forest type on this project site consists of a canopy of ear leaf acacia Brazilian pepper,and Slash pine.The midstory is scattered with some cypress cabbage palms and myrsine. The site has been greatly affected by an altered hydrological regime. The ground cover consists of heavy leaf litter and a dense carpet of grape vine. This habitat offers very limited habitat for any vertebrates. In total the site consists of approximately 4.68 acres. The following is how the acreage figures breakdown. 2.69 acres Mixed Hardwoods 438 1.51 acres Recreational Bridge Center 1896 0.48 acres Road& Highway 814 III Listed Species Survey The required survey for a Listed Species Survey calls for a survey covering 100%of the site,at prescribed transect distances per site acreage. Such a survey was attempted in September 2015. Established transects were oriented north- south and east-west and superimposed on an aerial map of the site These transects were ground- located and walked by compass bearing. Early morning (0730 - 1000),mid-da) (1100 - 1500)and late-d2y (1500- 1800)time periods were chosen to survey these transects. All possible species of plants and animals listed by state and federal agencies were noted. Concurrently.notes for FLUCCS mapping purposes were kept. Dense exotics at times prevent compete transects. Stationary observations were also utilized. 1N1 Results&Discussions Listed Flora A few listed plant species have been found.A few different Tillandsia spp. were found. None are considered rare. They are listed by the state of Florida primarily due to their commercial value. See FLUCCS Plant List Listed Fauna See Wildlife Species Observed Key Species Discussion Big Cypress Fox Squirrels Big Cypress Fox Squirrels are known to use similar habitat found onsite. Observations were keyed to searching for signs or calls of these animals, such as leaf nests in canopy trees or the distinctive chattering of territorial squirrels. No individuals were observed during this study. Conclusions Focused searches were conducted over two days. Transects were walked on straight compass bearings along a grid spaced at approximately 10 yards apart for the entire parcel. Other transects were primarily meandering transects through areas of prime habitat.All transects were walked at varying times from post-dawn&mid-day to pre- sunset hours. This parcel is bordered by Golden Gate Parkway. This project is located in the urban area. The parcel is approximately .5 miles east of the off rarnp of Interstate 75. The canopy is primarily vegetated with a Slash pine and ear leaf acacia. A few scattered cypress can be seen. The midstory consists of Brazilian pepper,wax myrtle and a few oaks. The lack of any sufficient hydrology has led to a dense ground cover of grape vine and a dense carpet of leaf litter. A few ground cover plants can be found such as: palmetto and beautybush. A brief assessment was conducted in September 2015, During this survey there was a lot of high noise and human disturbance. This corner is a high traffic area. The heavy traffic patterns and associate noise has a limiting factor on this parcel as suitable habitat. Any usage of this parcel by vertebrates may be happening at night. t'"" The main vertebrates encountered were birds traversing the subject parcel. Our survey has found no listed vertebrate species on this site. Our survey found a few Tillandsia's on site. Threatened,Endangered and Species of Special Concern Species Present Absent Black bear x: Florida panther x Everglades mink x Big Cypress Fox squirrel Indigo snake ! American alligator x Gopher tortoise x Gopher Frog Southeastern American kestrel Red-Cockaded woodpecker x Florida Scrub Jay Wood stork x Snail kite X Bald eagle x Limpkin x osprey x White ibis Tricolored heron snowy egret Reddish egret x Little blue heron x FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status 121 Single Family Homes 171 Pre School 172 Church 438 Mixed Hardwoods Upland This is the largest natural habitat within this project. The species composition consists of both wetland and upland plant species. The area does NOT meet the criteria as defined for Jurisdictional Wetlands. The area is severely drained and impacted by the presence of exotics. The midstory is almost impenetrable with Brazilian pepper and a canopy of ear- leaf acacia. In addition to the dense midstory of exotics,the entire area has a dense entanglement of vines, This dense midstory has limited diversity of the ground cover. The area does give hints of its past. Such native species as Slash pines,cypress and cabbage palms are present. Slash pine Firms elliotti FACW Cp,D ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiforrnis Exotic Cp,M,C carrotwood Cupaniopsis anacardioides Exotic M,0 Bra7ilian pepper Schinus terebinthifellus Exotic M,C Cabbage palm Sabal palnietta FAC M,C Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL palmetto Serona repens FACU GS) Laurel oak Ouercus laurifolia FACW Cp,O Strangler fig Ficus aurea FAC MS) M3Tsine Myrsine floridcina FAC M,C G,C Beauty bush Callicarpa Americana UPL M,O Dahoon holly Ilex cassine OBL M.0 wax myrtle Myrica cerifera F AC-F IV1,0 Broom sedge Andropogon VirgitlieliS FAC- GO Caesar\Need Urena lobate' FACU 6.0 Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL M,O Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia FAC G.0 Cat-briar Smilax spp. FAC G,C Poison ivy Toxkodendron radicany FAC 0,0 Grape vine Vitis rotundifolla PAC G,.D Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC 0„C Florida Trema Trema spp. FAC 114,0 Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC Dewberries Rubus spp. FAC GC ,---., snowberry Chiocoeca parvifolia UPL G,0 Beggers ticks Bidens alba FACW G,0 Ragweed Ambrosia arternissilfolia FACU G.0 1896 Recreational Bridge Center 814 Roads and Highways ABREVTATIONS— Canopy (Cp),Midstoty (M), Ground Cover(G) Dominant(D),Common (C),Occasional(0) INDICATOR STATUS- Obligate(OBL),Facultative wet plants(FACW), Facultative plants(FAC),Upland(UPL) Epiphytic Plants Wild Pines Stiff- leaved Tillandsiajasiculaia FDA/C Recurvecl T balbisiana FDA/T wired-leaved T. setacea FDA/T ...--... .--, WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED Common Name Species Status Birds; Dove-mourning Zenaida macroura illuejav Cvanocitta cristata Gray catbird Dunietella carolinensis Northern mockingbird Mims polyglottos Cardinal Richmondena cardinalis COPY EXHIBIT V. E. PUBLIC FACILITIES gA 3 / 1 GradyMinor Civil Engineers •Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects EXHIBIT V.E.1 PUBLIC FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities. Roadway LOS and facility impacts are discussed in the attached TIS. The subject Growth Management Plan Amendment proposes to permit an expansion of an existing social and fraternal organization land use on the 4.68± acre property. It is expected that this project will commence development in 2017 with anticipated buildout in 2017. The existing plan designation and zoning would permit 2 single family homes on the subject property. For purposes of this analysis it is presumed the building area is 15,000 square feet and a 200 player per day average. Potable Water The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Potable Water established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Service to this area is provided by Florida Governmental Utility Authority(FGUA). This Project will have no impact on the potable water system and capacity is available in Collier County. A comparison of the permitted Naples Bridge Center and expansion is shown below. Historical water and sewer usage based on Naples Bridge Center records provides the basis for the calculations. Water Demand: Existing Site: Residential(max 2 units): 2 units x 200 gpd/unit=400 gpd Proposed Site: 200 players/day x 5 gpd/player= 1,000 gpd 200 players/day x 5 gpd/player x 1.5 max. month= 1,500 gpd Collier County LOS: 150 gpcd Permitted Capacity: 52 mgd Current Demand (Projected Data): 30.2 mgd Data Source:Collier County 2014 AUIR Sanitary Sewer The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Sanitary Sewer established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Service to this area is provided by Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA). This Project will have no impact on the Collier County Regional Sewer System. A comparison of the permitted 2 single family homes to the proposed office/service use is shown below. Sewer Demand: Existing Site: Residential(max 2 units): 2 units x 200 gpd/unit=400 gpd Proposed Site: 200 players/day x 5 gpd/player= 1,000 gpd 200 players/day x 5 gpd/player x 1.3 max. month= 1,300 gpd Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Analysis Page 1 of 3 Collier County LOS: 100 gpcd Permitted Capacity: 16 mgd Current Demand (Projected Data): 10.6 mgd Data Source:Collier County 2014 AUIR Arterial and Collector Roads Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for discussions of the project's impact on level of service for arterial and collector roadways within the project's radius of development influence. Drainage The County has adopted a LOS standard for private developments which requires development to occur consistent with water quantity and quality standards established in Ordinances 74-50, 90-10, 2001-27, and LDC Ordinance 2004-41, as may be amended. The single project within the proposed subdistrict has been issued a surface water management permit by the South Florida Water Management District which has established criteria for the volume of water stored on site as well as the quality of the water which may be discharged from the site. The development within the subdistrict is consistent with the County LOS standards. The 2 single family homes permitted will have no LOS impact. Solid Waste The adopted LOS for solid waste is two years of lined cell capacity at the previous 3 year average tons per year disposal rate and 10 years of permittable landfill capacity of the disposal rate. There are no current capacity issues and none are anticipated through the year 2065. Existing: .52/pp disposal rate 2.4 pp/household 2 single family residences permitted 2 x 2.4 pp/household x.53 pp=2.54 tons solid waste/year Source: Collier County 2014 AUIR Proposed: Capacity is available to meet this generation standard. The calculation for the solid waste generation (disposal rate) is: Public/Institutional: 15,000 sq ft x .007 lbs/sq ft/day= 105 lbs/day x 365 = 38,325 lbs/year or 19.16 tons/year Source: Cal Recycle Current landfill capacity in 2017 is anticipated to be 17,639,413 tons. Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Analysis Page 2 of 3 Surplus Capacity as of July 2015: 15,151,444 tons Source: Collier County 2014 AUIR Parks:Community and Regional The proposed development will have no increased population density and therefore will have no effect on the community and regional parks. No adverse impacts to Community or Regional Parks result from the creation of the subdistrict. Schools The proposed development will have no increased population density and therefore will have no effect on the school district. No adverse impacts to schools result from the creation of the subdistrict. Fire Control and EMS The proposed project lies within the East Naples Fire District. There are two existing fire stations within 3.5 miles of the project site. In addition, Golden Gate Fire District has a station that is less than 1 mile from the project site. No significant impacts to Fire Control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed expansion of the existing facility. No significant impacts to Fire Control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed project. Estimated impact fees for EMS and fire would be determined at time of SDP based on the square footage per building. Sheriff, Fire Protection and EMS Services location/address of facilities intended to serve the project are; Golden Gate Fire and Rescue District Station 70 4741 Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Fire and Rescue District Station 73 14575 Collier Boulevard Collier County Sheriff Golden Gate Substation 4707 Golden Gate Parkway Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Analysis Page 3 of 3 Nd 1.1,?SIOZ/ZZ/6 ONO"Z3A 181103 113O8N\SONIIAVdQ\a3N33 300188 S3ldeN- n308N\ONINNVId -fOild\ONINNVId\S3113\IVOO1I'100\\ 0 3 .-S ;may= In "\ QCD tr W COLLIER BLVD o a r o w N s ','S.- < Q h wZ O N(f) va �, 44 Ww CS m< ate; < .- a < za °: lam' a C4 W J g g CO \ o d o E D 0 0 W a SANTA BARBARA BLVD SANTA BARBARA BL2 if ° =ew _L = �$ od � � <-4 am W W 0 • . 2m z 1 T INTERSTATE 75 (1-75) co 0 ° s D CC • . D. o g _ o `e w i zd OV r�vb- 3 WI" -__.._..._ ....._____ >g LIVINGSTON ROAD n- ° o w , a �s Q! Q/ n s �� V __ O w W W ry� z ' od �c� W$ N 0 w o n 0 `'<' 3 w, Z1 AIRPORT ROAD - .�__ L. AIRPORT ROAD ° i r z ° D -- o .- a ca Q I- o Z v O W F- In Z Z M Q V) Z O < w °C- L. W J _ 0 < E Z [L } CJ Z J I- 1- .W-1 co o z c� < (w0 °w m r w = O F- J —N id w z < I- -.. Z ~ -f Z-s \ �-, J Z Z Z Q Q 0w I- CC U .- F- Q > Z Z Id Ld O F. (n w F- I U W 0 0 co CC =In W < 1- J JO O N L z r< E ~ H Z� �' UJW O y CL K W [C(~n < E J d F-w Q FW-Z I a — W Li > W co CC h co cn _N F- J U)< U < < 1r O 10 m < D O -'Q O <J — 0 CO 0 ,g, Li W C0 In N -J 3 Cl_I W CO 3 Cl_ '® F LL 4+ ♦c 0 O I 4 • + COPY EXHIBIT V. E . 1c TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Can . urveyors• Planners • Landscape Architects Trebhlcock plannine�enuineerine Traffic Impact Statement Naples Bridge Center Collier County, Florida 10/30/2015 Prepared for: Prepared by: Q. Grady Minor and Associates Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 3800 Via Del Rey 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-947-1144 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock @trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee -$500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee—Small Scale Study— No Fee Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. \* s TRz df 4....'"IXEN3$-,00 ` NoF.47116 = * e s � ti re °. STATE OF = w `a i. 140N Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. 1 . 6 FL Registration No 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 12 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Table of Contents Project Description 4 J p Trip Generation 5 Trip Distribution and Assignment 7 Background Traffic 9 Existing and Future Roadway Network 9 Site Access Turn Lane Analysis 11 Improvement Analysis 12 Mitigation of Impact 12 APPENDICES Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan 13 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) 15 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition 22 Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibit 26 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 13 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 — Project Description The Naples Bridge Center project is located north of the Golden Gate Parkway midway between 1-75 and Santa Barbara Boulevard, within Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. Refer to Fig. 1 — Project Location Map, which follows and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Fig. 1— Project Location Map It PROJECT LOCATION 1..� ' \ - ., Y9f f' Hwy wa Y The Naples Bridge Center project proposes to add an 11,500sf addition to an existing 3,500sf structure for a total building area of 15,000sf. For purposes of this evaluation, the project build-out year is assumed to be consistent with the Collier County 2018 planning horizon. The project provides a highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. The development program is illustrated in Table 1. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 14 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Table 1 Development Program Development Land Use ITE Land Use Total Size Build out Code Year Recreational Community Existing 495 3,500sf Existing Center j _ Recreational Community 1 Proposed addition Center 495 11,500sf 2018 Total 15,000sf Development I i A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on October 14, 2015 via email (refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist). Connection to subject project is proposed via an existing right in/right out access drive to westbound Golden Gate Parkway. Trip Generation The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The software program OTISS — Online Traffic Impact Study Software (Version 3.1.1.193) was used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE rates are used for the trip generation calculations. Based on ITE recommendations, no reductions for internal capture or pass-by trips have been taken into consideration. The project proposed trip generation is illustrated in Table 2A. The trip generation for the existing development is shown in Table 2B. The difference between the proposed and existing trip generation is the net new traffic and is illustrated in Table 2C. Detailed calculations can be found in Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 15 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Table 2A Trip Generation (Proposed Conditions) -Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Way Volume Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Recreational Community 15,000sf 507 20 11 31 20 21 41 Center j Table 2B Trip Generation (Existing Conditions) -Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Way Volume Land Use Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Recreational Community 3,500sf 118 5 2 7 5 5 10 Center + E Table 2C Trip Generation (Estimated Net New Traffic) -Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Way Volume Land Use Enter , Exit Total Enter Exit Total Recreational Community 11,500sf 389 15 9 24 15 16 31 Center For the purpose of this TIS, the surrounding roadway network link concurrency analysis is analyzed based on projected PM peak hour net new traffic generated by the project (refer to Table 2C). The site access turn lane analysis is calculated based on the overall — future build-out external trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hour (Table 2A trip generation values). Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 1 6 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic generated by the proposed net new development was assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area and as coordinated with Collier County Transportation Planning Staff. The site-generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour and is graphically depicted on the next page in Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour. Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour Collier Distribution AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Roadway County Roadway Link Location of Project , Project Vol. Project Vol.* Link Link No Traffic Enter Exit Enter Exit Golden Project Entrance west to 0 Gate 21.0 175 60% EB-9 WB-5 EB-9 WB-10 Parkway Golden Project Entrance east to 40%Gate ' 21.0 j 40% WB-6 EB-4 WB-6 EB-6 Parkwa Y I Santa Barbara Boulevard Note(s): *Peak hour,peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 17 Naples Bridge Center—Tl5—October 2015 Fig. 2— Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour x, of EC T LOCATION , (II) <n. °/'1 1 t AL PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENTAGE PROJECT LCD CTI old (0) ■ ELITE = s ENTER— , EDIT=1 O IT-6 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION :: BY PM PK HR Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 1 8 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Background Traffic Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate from annual traffic counts (estimated from 2008 through 2014), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) volume plus the trip bank volume. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the build-out year 2018 Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2015 -2018) j 2018 Projected 2018 2015 AUIR Projected Pk Projected I Pk Hr, Peak Dir Pk Hr, Pk Hr,Peak Dir CC Traffic Background ' Dir Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Background Traffic Link Link Location c Growth Factor w/out Project Bank Traffic Volume ID# Rate (trips/hr) Volume w/out Project (trips/hr) (%/yr)* Facotor* (trips/hr)Trip Bank*** Golden I Project Gate 21.0 Entrance west 1,900 2.0% i 1.0612, 2,016 10 1,910 Parkway to I-75 Project Golden Entrance east Gate 21.0 to Santa 1,900 2.0% 1.0612 2,016 10 1,910 Parkway Barbara Boulevard Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate-from 2015 AUIR,2%minimum. **Growth Factor=(1+Annual Growth Rate)^3.2018 Projected Volume=2015 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2018 Projected Volume=2015 AUIR Volume+Trip Bank. The projected 2018 Peak Hour—Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation,which is underlined and bold as applicable. Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2015 AUIR and the project roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5-Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 19 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County 2015 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build-out. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Exist Peak Dir, Future CC AUIR Roadway Link Exist Min. Peak Hr Project Roadway Link Link ID# Location Roadway St LOBS rd Capacity Build out Volume Roadway Golden Gate-• Project Entrance 21.0 6D E 3,300(E) 6D Parkway west to I-75 Project Entrance Golden Gate 21.0 east to Santa 6D E 3,300(E) 6D I Parkway Barbara Boulevard Note(s): 2U=2-lane undivided roadway;4D,6D,8D=4-lane,6-lane,8-lane divided roadway,respectively;LOS= Level of Service Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network-Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future (2018). The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2018 future build-out conditions. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the roadway network closest to the project. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 110 Naples Bridge Center-T!S-October 2015 Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS)—With Project in the Year 2018 Roadway 2018 0 CC 2015 Peak Link Peak Peak %Vol Min LOS Min LOS Dir, Peak Di r, Capacity exceeded exceeded AUIR Roadway Dir, Peak Roadway Link Hr Peak Hr Impact without with Link Link Location Hr(Project ID# Capacity Vol Volume By Project? Project? Volume Added)* w/Proje Project Yes/No Yes/No ct** Golden Gate Project Parkway 21.0 Entrance 3,300(E) EB-9 2,025 0.27% No No west to 1-75 Project Golden Gate Entrance east Parkway 21.0 to Santa 3,300(E) EB-6 2,022 0.18% No No Barbara Boulevard Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report.**2018 Projected Volume=2018 background(refer to Table 4)+Project Volume added. Site Access Turn Lane Analysis Connection to subject project is proposed via an existing right in/right out access drive to westbound Golden Gate Parkway. For details, refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Golden Gate Parkway is under Collier County jurisdiction and is a six-lane west-east urban divided arterial with a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. The project accesses are evaluated for turn lane warrants based on the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook: (a) two-lane roadways — 40 vph for right-turn lane/20 vph for left-turn lane; (b) multi-lane divided roadways — right turn lanes shall always be provided; when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left-turn lanes. Projected turning traffic movements are illustrated in Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits. Main Entrance -Site Access—Golden Gate Parkway A dedicated right-turn lane is warranted as the project meets the multi-lane criteria. There is an existing right-turn lane for the project approximately 235 feet long. Proposed project is expected to generate 20 and 20 vph right-turning movements Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 111 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. Based on FDOT — Design Standards most recent edition - Index 301, the minimum turn lane length is 185ft (which includes a 50ft taper) plus required queue. The minimum turn lane length is recommended to be 210ft (to include 25ft of queue). As such, the existing turn lane is adequate to accommodate proposed traffic at build-out conditions. Improvement Analysis Based on the link analysis and trip distribution, the proposed project is not a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development generated trips without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Based upon the results of site access turn lane analysis performed at future build-out conditions, turn lane improvements are not recommended at project access location. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 112 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan (1 Sheet) n Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 113 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 ZONED E.ESTATES • USE. RESIDENTIAL • • PRESERVE - ' I �• I WATER MANAGEMENT 1 OPEN SPACE I I I I I BUING NCE I • WIDE I I EXISTG 10'IN 30'WIDE LANDSCAPE ' VEGETATED•BUFFER I �, I • � BUFFER I `- 1 r (,:I C.1-) I • ZONED:E,ESTATES I I ZONED:E,ESTATES USE RESIDENTIAL I USE: RESIDENTIAL I .� I P?OPOGED "I EX PANSIOI. I ARCi. I 9 4 ` c ;+yr EX,STING { :NAP!.SS BRIDGE c CCVT-P. I II + + I II_ `. —1 I E —25'WIDE TYPED "r LANDSCAPE I BUFFER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SITE SUMMARY • NOTES' 'i TOTAL SITE AREA- 4.681 ACRES '3 NAXIMUM BUILDING AREA. 15,000 SQUARE FEET 1. ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED AND DIRECTED AWAY FROM ADJOINING PROPER l ICS. PRESERVE: REQUIRED.0 273 ACRES(2.68i ACRES NATIVE 2. SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION SHALL UTILIZE VEGETATION X 0.10) CURB-SIDE PICK-UP.NO DUMPSTERS WILL BE LOCATED _� ----) PROVIDED 0.503 ACRES ON-SITE. SCALE.1".60' 14LLIO i NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER,INC. ®GradyMinor w m..nn. CONOmCNAL USE CONCEPTUAL SITE PUN ..an,:,�,:,� • t.w;.7...,��. • �'.n • i..w,'.�,..wm.a DATE AERIAL f1DWN4 JAN 2015 /55'•: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,m...... .. .• H.. SWRCE:GOLL�R COVNiY PRCPERTt'IPPR/dSER Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 114 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) (6 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 115 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply,or N/A(not applicable). Date: October 14.2015 Tune: N/A Location:N/A-Via Email People Attending: Name,Organization,and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sawyer.Collier County Growth Management Division 2) Norman'Irebilcoek,TCS 3) Daniel Doyle.TCS Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title:-Norman Trebilcock.AICP..PE Organization:Trebilcock Consultim Solutions,PA Address&Telephone Number: 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202,Naples,FL 34110:oh 239-566.9551 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name&Title Michael Sawyer,Project Manager Organization&Telephone Number:Collier County Transportation Planning Department: 239-252-2926 Applicant: Applicant's Name:0.Grady Minor and Associates Address:3800 Via Del Rev.Bonita Springs.FL 34134 Telephone Number:239-947-1144 Proposed Development: Name:Naples Bridge Center Location: on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway approximate!', 13 mile west of Santa Barbara Boulevard.(Refer to Fig.1) Land Use Type: Recreational Community Center ITE Code th LUC 495 Description: Proposed 11.500sf addition to existing 3.500sf commercial structure. A prior zoning request in 2007 utilized LUC 934,which has been superseded by LUC 495. The use of LUC 495 is consistent with the 2007 TIS. Zoning Existing.Single Family Residential with approved Provisional Use for a social club. Comprehensive plan recommendation:No change Page 1 of6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 116 Naples Bridge Center—TIS_October 2015 Requested Conditional use approval Figl—Project Location Map PROJECT LOCATION . o { . v_ .. S . Findings of the Preliminary Study: ^ Study type: Since estimated project new traffic volume is less than 50 AM or PM 2-way >' \ peak hour trips,this study qualifies for a Small Scale TIS—no significant operational or q' roadway impacts or work within the county right-of-way.The TIS will include AM-PM i peak hour trip generation,traffic distribution and assignments,significance test,roadway link analysis and site access points turn lane analysis. Roadway concurrency analysis—PM Pk Hr weekday traffic Access Analysis—AM-PM Pk Hr weekday traffic Internal capture and pass-by reductions are not considered for this study. I' Study Type: (if not net increase,operational study) Small Scale TIS I Minor TIS e Maior TIS ❑ Study Area: (. Boundaries: south — Golden Gate Parkway, east — Santa Barbara Boulevard, west— Livingston Road Additional intersections to be analyzed N/A r'' Build Out Year: 2018 Planning Horizon Year:2018 i Page 2 of 6 q I 1 .t. .. ,. ...• .,.w.,.., .,T x.,.. _. _,, ,. mow,.,. •P:_!l Pli Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 117 Naples Bridge Center—Tl5—October 2015 Analysis Time Period(s): Concurrence Weekday PM Pk Hr;Operational—Weekday AM-PM Pk Hr. Future Of Site Developments;N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates:ITE 9th Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None:N/A Pass-by firips:N/A Internal trips:N/A Transit use:N/A Other:N/A Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements:2018 Methodology&Assumptions: Non-site traffic estimates:Collier County traffic counts and 2015 AUIR Site-trip generation: OTISS—ITE 9th Edition Trip distribution method Empirical Engineer's Estimate. Traffic assignment method:project trip generation with background growth Traffic growth rate:historical 2008—2014 growth rate or 2%minimum Fig.2—Project Trip Distribution by Percentage PROJECT LOCATION NI e , > 609{0 4 % PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENTAGE Page 3 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 118 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 t 1 Fig.3—Project Turning Movements by Percentage PROJECT I LOCATION -- 1 coot 100%, y PROJECT TURNING' MOVEMENTS BY — PERCENTAGE Special Features:(from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations:N/A Sight distance:N/A Queuing N/A Access location&configuration:NIA Traffic control:MUTCD Signal system location&progression needs:N/A On-site parking needs:N/A Data Sources:CC 2015 AUIR;CC Traffic Counts Base maps:N/A Prior study reports:N/A Access policy and jurisdiction:N/A Review process:N/A Requirements:N/A Miscellaneous: N/A Yi $i Page 4 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 119 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Small Scale Study No Fee X = Methodology fee 5500.00 Minor Study-5750.00 Major Study-$1500.00 Includes 2 intersections Additional intersections-5500.00 each ill fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our Sign-off on the appiic ation. SIGNATURES 1.40rA4Slif,Tre,bilezakz Study Prepares---Norman Trebilcock Reviewer(s) /\ Applicant Page 5 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 120 it Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule FOGS will be paid incrementally as the development proceed: Methodology Review,Analysis Review,and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodoioey Review-$500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement,including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study"determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re-submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County.if needed. "Small Scale Study"Review-No:Additional Fee(includes one sufficiency revien) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a coneurnency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation,distribution and maximum threshold compliance. ":Minor Study Review"-$750 Fee(Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes:optional field visit to site confirmation of trip generation,distribution,and assignment,concurrency determination,confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected'assembled, review of off-site improvements within the right-of-way;review of site access and circulation,and preparation and review of"sufficiency.'commentslelue scions. "Maior Study Review" 51,500 Fee(Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency reviews) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination,confirmation of committed improvements,review of traffic volume data collected/assembled,review of traffic growth analysis,review of off-site roadway operations and capacity analysis,review of site access and circulation neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates,and preparation and review of up to two rounds of"sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review"-$500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the`;Major Study Review"and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the"Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews"-$500 Fee) .Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 6 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 1 21 Naples Bridge Center—715—October 2015 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition (3 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 122 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 (11. Project Herne: Naples Bodge Center•15 000af No: Date: 1004/2015 City StatearrovInce: Zip/Postai Code: 1 Country. Client Name Anatyat's Name: edition: 11E-TGtii 310 Ed/ten Weekday I AM Peak Hem I PM Pa* Noar land Use Size — . g i Entry arm Entry I Mit I Mary ! Sat . .......... ..„.... .. t 495.Recreational community center 1 15.0.' 254 253 . . ..."" .'.• 20 0 11 : 20 21 Reduction it , 0 : 0 , 0 4 .t.. Internal 0 0 0 0 0 = i o g P05545 0 1 0 o 0 o 0 Tot4 254 253 50 11 20 21 Total Reduction 1 0 0 i 0 I 0 5 1 0 , . Total Internal 0 0 0 0 - 0 g 0 Total Pass-by I 0 0 I i 0 0 . , 0 I 0 „. Tate Nortitass•by 1 254 : 253 i 20 1 11 , 20 i 21 i vsq \ . Period Setting ef Data provided by ITE i i Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis.To record any notes,click r"Add Notes above. Project Name. Naples Bridge Center-15400th I Analysis Name.. [Weeltda y I i Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total i 0,495-Recreational .1000—s-44.--Fee"—i',24v,s—s•i't te 15.:, rin--k-da-------I, 'P., Community Center ,,___ m , _ I, verage t 33.82 254,, 253''' 507''' l'.4 (0 (rid /es site out of ran9e ti)lndinates small sample stae..use carefully. Period Setting vt Data provided by 1TE .. Specify the Independent'Variable,Time Petiod.and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis.To record t any notes,doh -'Add Notes above. Project Name: Naples Bridge Center-15.002ef k t Analysis Name: IrAM Peak Hour 7 :, r Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total '. Q,495-RecrearonaI - 1000 Sq,Feet Gross 2.:j IV, .:,Weekday.Peak Holt r .+/3 ri;fera 0 vj II Community Center 2.05 20 11 31 g0g,ndiates size cut 01 range r t... Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 1 23 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 / \ Period Setting yr Data provided by ITE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis.To record any notes,click ° Add Notts above. " Project Name; Naples Bridge Center-15,000sf Anaysis Name: PM Ptak Hour Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 495-Recreational _i1000 Sq Feet Bross t 15 Weekday,Peak Floor i Avera v Comanunky Center �r. 2.74 20 21 41 s0)indicates size out of range. Protect Name: Naples Drmlge Center-Exlziiig Ne: Date: t20OtS City: State-Province: 2Ip4eatel Coder Cotntte n Client NNamr Analyst's Nma: Edition: I1e-T t 9tt[Eton Land uee laze ',__...... may i AM PolkHo r ' "'Peak Hour 4 a Entry — Ekit Entry � __--_ 495-Reereanneal Cone nCente 1 95=. # 59 55 5 2.... 5 Redudinn 9 0 0 a 9 9 internal 0 0 0 0 ' 9 9 Pass-by [ I 0 0 t b j .D G 0 Non-pass$y t Total : 59 as l 5 I 2 5 5 t' TotatRedttctlon 0 0 f 0 0 0 0 /—� Total internal 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 Total Pass-by a 0 fl 0 4 A 0 Tow Nun piss ety 53 f S9 g $ 2 5 , b t,;:..rp f mi rlry Ar. I Period Setting na Data provided by 1TE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation 0f the number of Trips generated in the analysis.To record r any mites,click Add Notes above. £, Project Name: Naples Bridge Center-Existing E Analyss Name: Weekday Lind MSe Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Thal 495-Recreat?onai 1000 Sq.Feet Gross IL-LI I, Weekday "v.f Average a'> Community Center """ ". "_. "" .... :. 33.132 50- 53` 110''- 0l indicatessize r,uI,, s ' r (t)indcates st^.x91 „ ;inn czrefull Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 1 24 mrvlesuriducomter—ns—ncmbo 2015 Period Setting .." Data provided by 1TE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis.To record any notes,click.''Add Notes above. Project Name; Naples Bridge Center-Existing , Analysis Name: :AM Pe*Hour_ l Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Tod q 495-Recreationai 1-1-90-0—Sg..Feet-Grosst jv.ir 3.5ID, !Weekday,Peak Hour FA rAverage--—--..,110 , di)indicates size out of range. Period Setting *4 Data provided by ITE Specify the Independent Vaiiable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysvc.To record i any notes,click'"Add Notes above. Project Name: Naples Bridge Center-Existing Analysis Name: I PM Peak Hour i Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Eat Total q,495-Recreabonal Community Center tun.~� �� Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 125 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibit (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 126 Naples Bridge Center—TIS—October 2015 PROJECT I (I) LOCATION fl,, 100% 100% z PROJECT TURNING MOVEMENTS BY PERCENTAGE r'1 PROJECT LOCATION AM-11 , PM-21 1AM-20, PM-20 PROJECT TURNING MOVEMENTS BY s K AM/PM PK. HR Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 127 1 COPY � EXHIBIT V.G . SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1 a: GradyMinor Civil i ngine 'rs • Land Surveyors• Planners • Landscape Ari [liiect4 fq, ,...,c)e., 782708 , f....i. . "' : .^.• Af I. 117' *A.140..41.7 ors° 5fai;s15t)%7 e•...co rosts.el I .- -2en ....,, i:t jou t a/-4 ,i,,,, ,,i /...) 'e 11 This Itiarranty Derd .,i,.,1.. 0„.. - A 1) . . . . , C. W. Eigington and Clara E. Edgington, his wife • -* . - • . $. , • . ' ' I.,,,,,,,,,i/,*, ,,,11,.,i i", n•cattor ia . . . , Jack W. Cannon . . . • „ .. . , • . 1747 Aline Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33902 , . - * hereittaiter cn114.r1!he rit.,,,It..r. - .. ' . ..._ ."*. • .. I lifitnesseth:Tr ,, 11, ,3,,+,1!•1>r, fr,r mre,1 In ,,,,,,i,1,-r. ,. of the stint ..i $ 10..00 _ oanierI.,$0.11,1,0.: . . '.- ' 1 • •4 i, ',set,itek...,ii•!...ii.,..it. h..reity or.nls. barrtntrIs. sells. 1 . -. I - , .- ,,,i ,.,,,to-e,, ,,,,o, li, r,,,,iteit.(Ill turrtt t-471,21.1 inn,'Oriole in Collier • • . _ .. . . . . . . . „ .- .. "..-he East 150 feet of Tract 75, Golden Gate ■ .• . ?states, Unit No. 30, according to plat in . . . . • . - ' ?lat Book 7, Page 58, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. ' • ? .. .. • ' ' -" . . .' . . . __. . . ' '. ; = :;-'..".:,--,', • ; . . " STATE oi,-- FLORITBA. , ' : . ' -- IA F-- — 7-z---7. 0 ... „, s-rsr= no — DOCUisiENTART-,. 'FLOR I*A SURTAX 2:11 '''' ii•ke .$1=-.'a 11 $ 5.'a: '.--fz" - .' 4,.- _ii, it.42.ia:; . r..., 1 5. 40 = '" – a:- tr----3A17"- vw.--:/,'''—,c---11#1r. ' ..' • ' - tt.t,..,:l . ,... 71 4s '''. = ' '•'— '. =,-(2r0 ',i 7,',,,' •,...., iiintri 10525 1 '■ , ' ' cl Eg 9 „:,•:•:;-;.-: : , ..•- • = '—. "' ' -7,:- '...'"•••.::.:—_—:41=11=11..t,r..... • • . ,.., • , , .. Ci. , • •- •• r2 -=,.. I Together ..Hi, .11 ,i‘, lenernentx. liOlfq 1 i felll eft., an I t 4 frIpltriertarvres thereto belonging or tn any- ' -.7., . ' ' ip= — • u-ise oppertaini,lo To 1-laue anti to }told, ihr SeIttle in ft-e ,intple furvt.er . . . ... .,, •• . (1, . lind !tie firInfor herelly tore,lartis teilh said. granter thal lite orantor.s .0 ,L i I tefitily seized of said land . . • - in fee simple; thet the orantor has good right and fateful ant/Rarity to sell and convey!aid. land; _thief,:sthoef - • . , • , . ..,. he title tit soh{Into! arid will tleferld the same against the tair41.11 eta i garl.tanpleorrsol'ilesn'tivle.oisnursioYet:e'r7'.:nndl'that saki land is free of all encismi,ranres except taxes accruing subsequent ,. . . . . . , ' 10 Occ00,b0, 11. 1978 and conditions and restrictions of record. ' . . . . . . • , .,. ., . - - . - • . . .-,, . , ..- , - ' *- •` .. * ' '• -- - . . , . . .. lit IiiitittSS iiihercof,the said rirontor has signed and sealed these prerena the day and year . .. . . .. .. , ‘, , ,.• . first above written. .. -. . , . .... . ., • sealed arcl clelirfit.,:s!„ .-oss.pregence: ' c.) ,__ •• ' W , . • . . -,, . . . .. . . --4—t • q. W. Ed,g .n, v ° 1 . . , . . . Clara E.ILlidliktair:1:1 i sTA-rt OF COUNTY OF ‘ . „ .. a . I tiERERY CERTIFY that on this dly,before me,an ofaficter duly . authorized in the State aforesaid and in the County aforesst o . acknosolerlgertents, personally appeared _, RECOROED CI7r1F_IiitAL n" Cu W. Edgington and Clara E. Edgington, his wif- CCUNTY,FLORIDA .- .. . . ,..., . . , z , ., - . " . - ;- .be the persona descritasi ;n and who executed the Am Z 3 is Pt!'13 . . . : "..'17;rivotii''ne gn""-kr;411:,.,ake'14'1*:4.:1 they acknowledged before our that they • eareated,O....aele... ,...‘,„ ..,, ... - ''r r:tritf‘st.tii-,..serg hand and official seal in the County.anelf . - 'tiStra.te,1,:ri'.;aforesaid this f c't Tii _ d Y . • . ''' ,A.D. 19'T , . '.,,:-.::;!.. .,Zu:, , j.., ..— rN,.-, , . . -', ": :::•;.V-7.....!=,.. *"?-:;r-';'- ,41;aigiii ' f-ig. 77.c.i./ / _.6.444, ../..r . .. 4,4 • noCarekod*Ad Vie.6,46 i■••Of ficrt 1,4140.4s pf ' - ' . 77715 111:1111*.#11 . f .7'. Stave—L.-41andricks..--!_ice Pres. . ,. . . tout',1100^.T7 1,.01e+OA , , , Wt1.1tAiA i.N.I.KAP-d.S.I.tA.0 il daitro. 'tift*., ,.. INSURANCE AGENCY,INC. S 71...1-- , ''''P.O. BOX 8027 ' - . . _ i.a F , LORIDA 33941 t; ax-.3.-2-1, , -- - - _._ .. . 31=,.. , .. .,..... • . . , ...... . . . . . .......,_ , . .. ' ., , , ., • . . .. , __ r. 1 + O.R.877 PG 1642 RAMCG FORM 4 L✓ fi ' cie r wARR•te7t GEED 659116 " . This inde�re,.3fade this %y'e.{< day of (.Z a y . A.D. 19 �, 13fEf I JACK W. CANNON . 410 i of the County of Collier and State of Florida party of the first part,and NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, INC. whose mailing address is 1400 Gulfshore Boulevard, Suite 214, Naples of the County of Collier and State of Florida , , party of the second part. Witsseth, that the said party of the first part.for and in considerat;on of the sum of SI0.00 Dollars.and tither good and valuable considerations to him in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowl- edged,has granted,bargained, sold and conveyed.and by these presents tloherebyJrant,bar- - gain. sell, convey and confirm nnlo the said party of the second part and their heirs .s and assigns!leerier,all that certain parcel of land lying and ber,.g in the t:ocrnty of Collier r and Slate of Florida , more particularly described as follows: s The East 150 feet of Tract 75, Golden Gate Estates, • Unit No. 30, according to plat in Plat Book 7, Page , 58, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. * is a. 1 .tom+ `` r flit ti t oho: � �� co `STATE or= FL.©R I 3A�, a s Vie A�G 82 .., pOCUMENIART STAMP:tax 1 i — QEPT Or/wit NUE}rt!I:**7 t 0 • 0 . .,.., 4.. . . . This is a vacant lot, non-homestead property. a Togtfhttr frith all the tenements. hcreditaments and appurtenances, with every privilege, right, - tit!e, interest and estate. (fruiter and right of dower, reversion, remainder and easement,thereto belonging or in anyryzise appertaining: To Itaut and to Hold the same in fee simple forever. And the said party of the first part dam covenant with the said party of the : second part that ht r leralan!, seized of the said premises, that they are free from s . ,, all encttnzhrances and that Al< h4S good right and law. ; jul authority to sell the Nunn,';turd the said party of the first part dot s hereby fully warrant s the title to said land,and trill defe'nrl the valor.against the lout-fat claims of all persons whomsoever. , In ifiltness LtPubr'tot, the said party of the first part has hereunto set his hand and seal tire thug and year above written. Signed, see .nd delivered in oar presence: Ae, 4111. ■et,ei;9(/ a f 1 ( .-. j 1 t.s • 0 77.as Immanent ptrpand by: Jack W. Cannon Atl,6ruRt. 22, Box 776B, Estero, Fl. 33908 'so' • 1 .�. INSTR 5109951 OR 5141 PG 2924 RECORDED 4/17/2015 2:48 PM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc @.70 $507.50 REC $18.50 CONS $72,500.00 This Document Prepared By: Leonard P.Reina,P.A. 501 Goodlette Rd.N.,Suite B-206 Naples,Florida 34102 Parcel ID Number: 38167120002 Consideration: $72,500.00 Wa : Deed THIS r• p : z ,� �,° M BENEFIT OF TITLE I., r ;•I r; •7 OPINION. This Indenture,Made this y of areh;2 15 A.D. Betwe Andrew J.Szmigiel,a single ian,,ns d' ;s %2 terest, \ of the County of Hartford,State of Conti • i i w. ^ `."• .• .zri. Naples Bridge Center,Inc.,i c t ,; t r ti• 1 e: 'n: tft t e of the State of Florida /'1 whose address is:5865 Golden Gat ' \v. 411 --: of the County of Collier,State of Fl ntee. `��' `, tag Witnesseth that the GRANTOR,for ' onsideration of the sum of 0 t j ----------------------TEN DOLLA'4 0)-------------- ---- ---.. its, and other good and valuable consideration to . • r .• in hand paid b s'77v;' the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,has granted,bargained and sold to the said GRA d ?' .°---gg 1,r rs and assigns forever,the following described land, situate,lying and being in the County of Collier State. \ O tl •--''' The West 150' of Tract 82, Unit 30, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7,Page 58,Public Records of Collier County,Florida. TOGETHER with all the tenements,hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To have and to hold the same in fee simple forever. Subject to restrictions,reservations and easements of record,if any,and taxes subsequent to 2014. and the grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land,and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. SZMIGIEL ST NBC *** OR 5141 PG 2925 *** In Witness Whereof,the grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed,sealed and delivered in our presence: i ? (SeaI) 'nted Name: v_ i (lc� A drew J.Szmigiel 1 1*/ 1 P.O.Address:92 North Main Street,Windsor Locks,CT 06096 T Pri ed Name:h'la taiq 19 . Oare.(If-. Witness \7---- 1 STATE OF Connecticut / .,it-^ COUNTY OF Hartford i /7",..,i',..,N.141-M-----' , —...\ , The foregoing instrument was I kn wt (ed ef�re it th. ; =da F 217M' arCh,2015 by Andrew J. Szmigiel,a single man who is personally know `t. t f r ho t pkddt$ $his ! mover. i CCI .ls identification. y 3 L yi �� f , ; t ,\itit• e:Mat1'xi A,ni,-e l ft if, i iblic A9y-C6mmission Expires: / / My Commission Expires July 31.2019 I • SZMIGIEL ST NBC LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION ,....., TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN I hereby authorize Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. (Name of Agent) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in this Application. ----,--? ." Signed:, ,, Z ---'<------.'" -11-:---f--"(---- Date: 47 ' Z t-( ( •li-+er Banks a(s-Petf r ' ent of Naples Bridge Center, Inc. zfr I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. atu C----< ignrer of pl<cant Roger Banks as President of Naples Bridge Center, Inc. Name -Typed or Printed STATE OF ( Florida ) COUNTY OF ( Collier ) Sworn to and subscribed before me this , )' day of 0,-,,,,IDC--,-- , 20_15 by .---<1#/ _7"----' ,,,-- MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: (. C.\-- \ 12.C__—_.-\£ , (krEitary Public ---- . ,,-- - 4---Av?.- MARMA LUCIA crimes CHOOSE ONE OFTI-TE FOLLOWING: ,.,. . sli Mabry ININIc-Stale of Florida IA, ,.. .r.,,,. C81111114slon 0 FF 212134 N;RIZA; ' Comm.Expires Oct 11,2016 who is personally known to me, My, ' ' who has produced 1--L. i)'4 ,...,, ,-.- t-‘(-1/4 t1),' as identification and ,--/ did take an Oath did not take and Oath NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of%500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term." „.—...„ 7 2015 FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT FILED DOCUMENT#737048 Feb 22, 2015 Entity Name: NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, INC. Secretary of State CC4905188163 Current Principal Place of Business: 5865 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLES, FL 34116 Current Mailing Address: 5865 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLES, FL 34116 FEI Number: 59-1713376 Certificate of Status Desired: Yes Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: ALTSCHULER,JACQUELINE 2090 MORNING SUN LANE NAPLES,FL 34119 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent,or both,in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: JACQUELINE ALTSCHULER 02/22/2015 Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Officer/Director Detail : Title PRESIDENT Title TREASURER Name BANKS,ROGER Name PAUL,FREIBERG Address 1875 LES CHATEAUX BLVD Address 7505 STONEYBROOK DRIVE 104 UNIT 734 City-State-Zip: NAPLES FL 34109 City-State-Zip: NAPLES FL 34112 Title VP Title SECRETARY Name SILVERMAN,KATHLEEN Name OTTINA,MOLLIE Address 6624 GLEN ARBOR WAY Address 1140 ROYAL PALM DRIVE City-State-Zip: NAPLES FL 34119 City-State-Zip: NAPLES FL 34103 I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath;that lam an officer or director of the corporation or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 617,Florida Statutes;and that my name appears above,or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: PAUL B. FREIBERG TREASURER 02/22/2015 Electronic Signature of Signing Officer/Director Detail Date COPY Pre-application Meeting Notes GradyMinor Clvi! Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architect . : • . fl. . - • ... . .. . ei .. . Cr..I. .......... -1-) 4-,,.... , ._.. 7.f.....4....:,..t ... 0.?._____ •.• _ . ,... , 4,.., . , • _ ....._ •• -....14A-11-'--14.-4"VttAdC-A- 101)1AU" 1.-----• 4;•")---. .._ftr-rfil 0.--,-z-41,------•-4-.-1-2,....1... _. r-....x.-L..,_,..._•• -ki.._,,,,4 Lt,„..,2 r- : . L...... ___ • - re....„ ....,....... 4..0-71......._.--ifeL.2.___ ....._, --) _.. ......_._... .__._._.._....__._.._..___._____........ _ 1 ‘.... -'-- - x.vt-e t-- ) L . . . .... ... . . _ . ....._ .. ______ , .,,, ... .....: .... i . , ..... 'A-- ._.. .. ... ..... _ ._ ....... . -,........ -47. 9,„1_,A....., .___ .....__._____... . .._..... ...,.. .. ....C.1--!'N-1....2,...,--....17.11,--7‹..---7.4....:( , . _ ... .. . •--- • •----- -- ... ..._.. ._......___ ._. ....__......._ _ ___ ..___._..._ .__... . .. . .„ ................. .. ... - _ ... _. . ...___.. . _ . ._....________ _ ......... ._ ._ ______ .. ..... .... _.. . . ........___._..................___ (". . . .. . . ._. .... _._. . .. .... _. .. . .... .___ ..._ .....-.....-........-....----.....---,....-. ........,.....,..„-------- . PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petitions PL20150000873,Conditional Use and PL20150002525, Small Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance iplik , 0 r 1 1 qi 1,,, (Spy i e of Applicant) State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 30th day of November, 2015 by Sharon Umpenhour, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. ,f '( ' (Signatute of Ndta yj tbfic) (Notary Seal) Printed Name of Notary „1.::,Fr,, JOANNE JANES MY COMMISSION t FF 090820 rr. ,, EXPIRES:March 14,241$ ''z ,°r aadedThru Budget Notary Services er ry GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects November 25, 2015 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting Naples Bridge Center, Inc., (P120150000873, Conditional Use and PL20150002525, Small Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment) Dear Sir or Madam: Formal applications have been submitted to Collier County, seeking approval of a Small-Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment and a Conditional Use Petition, by Naples Bridge Center, Inc., represented by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. for the following described property: The subject property is comprised of approximately 4.68± acres, located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway east of Interstate 75 (1-75) in Section 29, Township 49 S, Range 26 E, Collier County, Florida. Naples Bridge Center, Inc. is asking the County to approve these applications, which propose to add approximately 2.34±acres in the E, Estates Zoning District to the existing 2.34± acre Naples Bridge Center, Inc. site in order to expand the Naples Bridge Center facility on the current site, and to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in order to permit parking, open space and water management facilities on the 2.34± acre expansion property. You are invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting hosted by the applicant to inform nearby property owners, neighbors and the public of the proposed amendments to the subject property. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing, and will be held on Monday, December 14, 2015, 5:30 pm at the Naples Bridge Center, 5865 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida 34116. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by e-mail, phone, fax or mail to: sumpenhour @gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134. Sincerely, Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician Q. Grady Minor&Associates,P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs,FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com 1 '_v w Q m W v Star Grass'LN r E ai co tr) -o to w i a ill — O s .00 P Copper Leaf LN 5t CT pW d' r SUBJECT PROPERTY Q 2' PLS u) ♦ U co Painted Leaf LN 1:>1._S (c) p.VE S BATH EY LN PL SW � 7 C .-t 2B' AVES Gold' ii PKWY GOLDEN GATE PK 1 29th PL SW!„_, . Cl) co ( u) Cl) Cl) w w rr m 1-0 Lr v co German Woods T Bass Paint CT ---- Belville BLVD 0 o ra•:Igar 111 7� . ed cta -nueecreation LN —: Qa monarch CIF? U _ J fl) ft u� D; bysh re T ? CO� w 0 �� U n cc I co o Jot m... ,. . 175 2 �o - 0 C v •� ' Henley D_ i Z Q �/�RdGOT Cl) ' ' .. r\-N bleao n'\---:', o / o o o a a a a o 0 0•`1 9 8:O a m M n m W H r m m . m m H p ti W W W H O m n m m o , H W m m m m O W m m n m a C a : 0 A - D m O r r O M O O W uM C' a a M M 0 In a n N N H O O C' M O W 0 C' 0 C. M C' I . O N C' n W a D U1 N N 0 R ti 0 M Vn tf W D D p c c o v o v a O a o a C Ca . .1 a 7 a W a V a o m a a W W C C7 W a v a v a a a m m a O r r r r r r r r O n n O r n n O m n n n n O n n n n m r r n o n r r o M n r in 0 n n r a 9 r r n r r r r r H n l0 .O lD ui tp W ,O t0 .D .D .O 1, pNj .D l0 tp N t0 .D .O I. tO tD tG .O W tG t0 l0 m t0 tD tD tO t0 .D t0 m .O W In I- tD to tD lD l0 tD l0 t0 .O l0 t0 .i CO t0 H .ti H H H H H H ,-4 H H H . . . . . . . . . . . .10 .1 .1 .1 H .-1 .4 J H H H .ti .ti H H O U .l .4 .1 J . .-1 .N .1 .H N .ti .-I O 0 .-i . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 .-1 .1 H .1 4 .1 .1 .1 H H .1 H H H H H H H H .i .a H H H .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 4 .1 .1 .1 .14 .1 .1 H H M M M M M M M M M CO a M CO w M M CO M M rn M CO a M CO M M CC M M M N CO CO CO 0 M M M M CO M M M 0 M M CO g CO M M M M CO M M M M M F- LL LL LL .1 LL LL Z LL LL U. . . . . . . . .U. W IL .L LL U J LL , LL W , LL LL w LL LL LL IL LL LL IU1 J 0 LL LL U. w U. LL U. U. LL LL LL LL U. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL } LL LL W Vl V N Vl Ul N o Nl of a¢ w of o of of of 0 of N of of of 0¢ Vl of VI c of of of m of of of of N of w o of In N F m Vl Vl N of w A of n 0 N W w W W W W W W W W W w w w W W W W W W W W W W W w J J L J J J W W W W W W m J j u W W W W W W W W W W F 2 a a a a a a a a a d a a 2 a a a a d a d a a a a a z a D 0. 0. 0. a w a d 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. a 2 a a a C. a a a a a a a a a d a < 4 < a a a a a a a a ¢ a Q a a s a s a a a a Q Q a <Q a a a 0 a a a 0 a a a a a a a a 0 a a a 0 a a a a a a a a a a a Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z an Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z 2 2 2 2 Z U 2 Z Z 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z In Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z 2 0 W > W Z 2 O 4 2 Z 2 0 > co Z Z < w W m CC 0 0 m N .n Q In vv) Z Z a a Z H w I-w w a N Qmm ON N m cr Z Umt Uri N m M o~ O O H } >- J } z W 0 m Z ZZ N Z ZaU' Z a Z a a cc LL U. W W 4 W■ W J J W J W a .) J Q W C a 0 00 0 2W ° >- O O Z J 0 Z 0 m F Z w n w w W In /� Z Z Z Z \ ■ ca x Z x L. VI N ~ m 0 z FQ- 2 9 / \ N H W G F_. F- 0 W Z J w Z Z Z O / M Q H a a a N a m a a \ U :Rog Q 0 Q Q M CO O a m a a a N F- N a m oN P a l7 0 a 0 a .n -.n 0 H HH 0 mun, nn 0 00 NmN .n1 0O m W Om 0 1 ZLc, 7 on, In omi > > rmn Ii In too D n In um, IInn .nn o Ini m 2 m .mi. F- Z O W I- m ~ W ¢ 2 Z 0 .n it of 0 ! > 0 4 Y H• J } } O W J 2 } r Y J L J Y .~n } } Y } c‘ 3 2 0 m Y Y F V Y m ¢ 0 Y 0 Y m W O Y Z Y m Y Y a a a m ¢ a a c� g _cJc a y�y ¢ d Z m m 2 Z d < x Z u, Z a Z a a Z Z a Z w d CC W F- O F Q J O Z m H f• G C a m F- Q O W F- Z ¢ x _ J a O LL 2 0 W H N F N J F 0 N F < F- U' Cal CO U = a Cal l07 LL m arm a 3 a 2 .3n l¢7 W _1 0O Z _s _1 0 Z a M O Z _, > I� 0 0 � Q i- 0 a l¢7 > 0 - Fm- Y -L 0 w -J 24 U' w O W W rm .a' m ¢ W O W W Z O a N K x N W m W p, F� 0 W ' m N O Z W AS W W Z W Z 0 W W m W W N 0 0 W D O m a W - O J O a m ¢ O m •n J a 0 W W ,T, m m O x Q m . a ¢ O a ¢ w Z of a Iy2j < O 0 Q W w a O ? O O O 0 a O Z ¢ X H O a<1 0 = 0 a J O U ut 0 a !7 W w N of W m a , w .n 0 O a < . a s l7 .n ¢ Z - a C. a 0 c a o m 0 0 0 Lu 0 a } = a 0 Q a 0 . l7 ',( W `�Orn ¢ lz7ai W MN, l? oomow tW ,-, m C W .INOn .4rmnNrrnn4COOwD - 01 N- 0OLuNOZCONNoaw $ ma W ONn ZIALunlnm ? � N .nc .n = .10NMUcUUm .no_ .n W .1 .nlnln < Ni .nlnln0C .lmin ¢ In l7 .nL .naoOln I- v, w z W -W+ Q K N Z Z Z W ¢ 0 z Z m 3 O a m tal WW x x w w J W =¢ J } d z 0 o¢i w P J as V Z a J w 1- aU J U 2 3a I-.n ex , 2zw a aOa In x _ (7 Y F- Z J d U N w 0 ow_ 0 CC U Rj U CZ 4S x 2 2 K a r U W W -. W Z CO . J } F- V O m W U J J C V u.- .7.7, 0 U a c w J W Y a 0 = C °� O > c a Z O K a O MW> F- W w W Y Z m CC t>b W ¢ _ 3 a Z O V O ¢ K wzwww Z O G x Z Q OS W O a Z O Z O W U 0 g 0J Q 0 ¢ , O W ¢ W 2 W J a Q a W m Z J ¢ W = M W W x U a D O w a o Ir+ > Z .0Z = 3 oo W }az ¢ O3az � ol- wtx_, 3 > ? � = sz ° '¢_' z0o� ? I- oLuEzz .aaQma � - wcZ� o w O L O W F V, aUoU W - 0 00: J N20KmO2xYUm0 ¢ x ¢ d W 2 Y? W Vt W UmN JJOzF- K a' W 0 O Z ¢ C O C Y D V x W Y W W O O W Z J 0 _J w ut O O O ¢ a ¢ x a z 0 N w w ,,, z g O z z > 2 K F- O j ¢ m J J Z ¢ a W m DJ O W O < m °C J O O OC ¢ Y O w I¢L W Q a O W d' W O W 0 Z a a U W W O O ¢ ¢ Q W .il N N a a W 0 4 Q Q 2 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ mmmmmmmmUUUUUUU00000 00 ,900 YYWCGGLGGLZZ22000aMO- W N VIO C n m o M o n n a n o m W m n W r N M o a m n M W 0 m m 0 m n n m n m 0 0 m n M N N a a 0 n W m a n o m m N 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000 ,.. 000000000000000000000000000000000 O m N O W m a W m OO m <t W N m W N tV 0 W W W O O N O m O a N N N C' 0 N W 0 N 0 m W .,7 0 W N 0 C' N 0 0 Y m 0 n N m N m W O tO m N m m N r m M N m n H 0 n m m O m O m a .1 0 W O O M m H O W H m W .1 m tO M N a r H N a r 0 N w to In n .n r n n m In In W OO m m m In m r toC CO m aO m to .O m In 000 m to to 01n m m m v m n In a s tc 0 mm a In m In In lnW OO m OO A Y W W W W W W W .O W tO W W W tO tO W t0 W W W W W tO W W W W W W r W W W r W W W W W W tO W W W W N W W tO W tO W W W W W W tO / U H H H e1 H H H H .i H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H .i H H .1 H H H H H H H H H H H H .i H H H H H H H H .i H H H H W m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m C. M M M M m m M M M M M M M m m m M M M M M M m m m m M m m M M m M M M m M m M M m M m m m m M M m M m M M M M M m m 0 O 00 e v ' V v 0 N 00 01 00 0 TIT evinvaal $ og o n n n v n r , M 10 6 6 M .1 6 M 6 to l0 ci .-1 e-I 6 0 , eo c-I 0 .-1 ri al al .-I al al .-1 1 In al al mmmenen nnmmm = m ....1 Z J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL K Vt.tit. W 10 W W W W W O O Q 0 < 0 0 0 Q QQ O Q Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m Z LI Z al 0 In it Z 0 > J CO I0 CC �� Q in m Q = J -4 0 M 0 at N 10 0 in ry 1L m 9' 0 , a 2 w Z • J J Z > ? Z 5 Q « a C Z J J J IY j , 0_ VI - W < 2100 =10,...2 > f< 0 Q Q Q ZI— re Z ¢ • 0 0. 0 0 10011 O N d Q o o to V1 0 co I— rti 0 al O co n m m co .r-1 w < coo N.al Y in in in Q in en 0 in ri in co o R cc 0 Z O w 0 w Z ¢ = Z LL O t-- 2 Q 0 C a U K �_ Q a z 'y;, - Off Q w in 00 CZ W LLO Q = v, c0 Z 0 .y O O d W U H N- J co l7 Y o0 p Q w c Q l7 eI a. a g ' ~ Q > u Di a Q CCM �_,, (1,/ M .-1 IN Ni 01 M 0 0 00 In l0 01 ftJ'0 a ITT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 C7 per. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 00 00 a 10 to o en 01 a 00 to 0 C7 vi o V o 00 10 al a m Iv ry m y el 10 <0 CO 10 10 I� 00 N 1� 00 00 .0 .M / \ 11) to tD ,O VD 10 to to to to ,o 0. al al al al al N 40 N 40 ri al r0 0 M Tenn m ten IOOn rn en M en en 000'1 V`a' Z NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions Naples Bridge Center, Inc., (PL20150000873,Conditional Use and P120150002525,Small Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment) The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing Naples Bridge Center, Inc. on: Monday, December 14,2015,5:30 pm at the Naples Bridge Center,5865 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida 34116 The subject property is comprised of approximately 4.68± acres, located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway east of Interstate 75 (1-75) in Section 29, Township 49 S, Range 26 E, Collier County, Florida. Copper Leaf LN e5� N 2mthPLS`I SUBJECT PROPERTY Painted Leaf LN 26tH Pt Sti 27th AVER BATHEY LN 2702 P � ':71h C SW 2Btf Goh'en aro 1+KWY GOLDEN GATE PK" ►- 29th PL SW z F- op 1 1 ICI LO CO German Woods T Bass Poir t CT Naples Bridge Center, Inc. is asking the County to approve these applications, which propose to add approximately 2.34± acres in the E, Estates Zoning District to the existing 2.34± acre Naples Bridge Center, Inc. site in order to expand the Naples Bridge Center facility on the current site, and to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in order to permit parking, open space and water management facilities on the 2.34±acre expansion property. Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail by December 14, 2015 to: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Phone: 239.947.1144 Fax: 239.947.0375 Email: sumpenhour @gradyminor.com /—*\ 1 1 2 TRANSCRIPT OF THE 3 NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER 4 CONDITIONAL USE AND GMPA 5 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 6 December 14, 2015 7 5:30 p.m. 8 9 10 11 Appearances: 12 WAYNE ARNOLD 13 ED KANT 14 SUE FAULKNER 15 NANCY GUNDLACH 16 SHARON UMPENHOUR 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 1 MR. ARNOLD: All right. Good evening, 2 everybody. I'm Wayne Arnold of GradyMinor, and 3 this is Sharon Umpenhour from our office. She'll 4 be recording the neighborhood meeting. 5 It looks like most of the folks here are 6 either staff or the Bridge Center. I know we have 7 Russell Tuff (phonetic) from the Golden Gate Civic 8 Association tonight, and then a neighbor, Vlad 9 (phonetic) , I think is your name. So we have two 10 members of the public that I'll try to address what 11 we're going through in the process and then open it 12 up for some questions and probably exchange /, 13 (indiscernible) . 14 Do you think my voice is okay? 15 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah 16 (indiscernible) . 17 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. The process we're going 18 through is a two-step process. We're actually 19 amending the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow a 20 conditional use to be approved on the eastern-most 21 parcel that we have here. The Bridge Center bought 22 that property and is seeking to expand the 23 facilities on the existing tract that we're sitting 24 in, but we would limit then, through the 25 conditional use, improvements on this part of the /—'\ 3 1 property to parking. 2 This is kind of the concept plan we're working 3 from, showing an expansion of the Bridge Center 4 that would be authorized through the conditional 5 use and the plan amendment language, limiting 6 ourselves to a maximum of 15,000 total square feet. 7 It's a little bit bigger than the proposed 8 expansion that they're looking at, but really 9 wanting to make sure that if they need to make 10 minor incremental changes in the future, that they 11 don't have to come back through this process every 12 time. 13 And then this is the property that's to the 14 east that we're adding as part of the conditional 15 use in the plan amendment, and we've limited 16 ourselves to preserve open space and parking uses 17 on that site. None of the physical building 18 improvements supporting the Bridge Center would be 19 located there. 20 And also made a provision for a small 21 maintenance building to be built in the future, 22 just to allow the Bridge Center to maintain its 23 property. 24 So the process we're in, we've had one 25 sufficiency round of comments from the county 4 1 staff. They've asked for some technical things 2 related to the comprehensive plan. Zoning, I don't 3 think we have any significant issues of any kind, 4 but for our neighbor, we're calling that a minimum 5 30-foot wide vegetative buffer along our eastern 6 boundary adjacent to you. 7 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Is it set in stone? 8 Is it fixed, like, you know, you aren't going to 9 change it to, say, 20 or 50 in the future? 10 MR. KANT: No. I can sit here and represent 11 that I told you 30. It's going to be at least 30. 12 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. 13 MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, and we don't have the 14 details of that. We just simply called it, for 15 this purpose, as a vegetative buffer, but if 16 there's additional dialogue between you and 17 Mr. Kant or any of the Bridge members, you know, 18 certainly let us know if there's details there that 19 you need. 20 But that process that we're going through, 21 again, that's a comp -- small scale plan amendment 22 and a conditional use. We don't have any hearing 23 dates established. We kind of went through those 24 loosely with the comprehensive planning staff 25 today, and we would hope to get through this / 5 1 process maybe April or May time frame in the 2 spring, but, of course, like any of you who have 3 seen them, we'll post zoning signs. You're within 4 the noticed radius where you will get a letter 5 indicating that there's an upcoming public hearing. 6 And then with the Civic Association, I know 7 that the -- some of the Bridge representatives have 8 met with your group and I think we had a pretty 9 positive outcome, but if we need to come and make a 10 presentation to your group at some point, you know, 11 if you'd let us know, we'd be happy to come back 12 and do that once some of these details are flushed 13 out. 14 That's really kind of what we're doing. 15 I think I forgot to introduce Nancy Gundlach. 16 MS. GUNCLACH: Hi. 17 MR. ARNOLD: She's the planner handling the 18 conditional use application. 19 And then we have Sue Faulkner, who is here 20 from comprehensive planning handling the small 21 scale amendment. 22 And for the amendment to the comp plan, 23 there's -- just so everybody is aware, there was a 24 prohibition on more conditional uses and commercial 25 development on the Parkway. So we're amending that III it 6 1 section to allow this to be an exempted site. 2 It was different than, Vlad, you may remember 3 like the David Lawrence Center, they kind of 4 created their own district and road standards. 5 We're looking to really create our standards 6 through the conditional use process, so just a 7 little different, but the same result at the end of 8 the day. It allows us to expand on the existing 9 property and then put our parking, water 10 management, open space on the other parcel. 11 It's really -- I think that's it, in a 12 nutshell. I mean, I'm happy to answer any 13 questions that you may have. I know members of the 14 board, you may not have been as plugged in as Ed 15 has been, but happy to field any questions from 16 anybody, or if you have questions of staff. 17 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Will the rear of 18 the -- will the rear of the property be taken -- 19 the vegetation taken off to create the swale? 20 MR. ARNOLD: Some of it will. We're proposing 21 to -- the county has a native vegetation retention 22 requirement. And they told us that we need about 23 .4 acres, so a little under half an acre. This 24 plan represents about half an hour of native 25 vegetation preservation, and we're keeping most of /Th 7 1 that along the back side, but behind what's been 2 previously cleared. 3 And then we're not calling preserve adjacent 4 on this so we can treat it as a landscape buffer. 5 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I see. 6 MR. KANT: However, if I might interject, one 7 of the things that we want to try to do is to keep 8 as much of this native as possible the way it is, 9 maybe get rid of some of the wild stuff, the 10 peppers and that type of thing, but, frankly, it's 11 to our advantage to do that because it's just that 12 much less we're going to have to spend on 13 re-vegetating, you know, to get that landscape 14 buffer. 15 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. 16 MR. KANT: So we want to try to keep as much 17 of what's in there natural as we can. 18 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Was that expected 19 to be water retention, then? 20 MR. ARNOLD: Well, the area back here, we're 21 calling that as probable water management area. We 22 can use parts of landscape buffers for water 23 management, but Mike Dowlett (phonetic) , one of our 24 engineers, is actually working on the site 25 development plan and looking at how we're going to III 8 1 treat that 30 feet, and I don't think we have to 2 rely on it for water management. Maybe some 3 conveyance from collecting some of it to bring it 4 back here, but not much of it. 5 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay. 6 MR. ARNOLD: If any. We're not quite there 7 yet. 8 MR. KANT: Yeah, probably, I would think -- 9 well Thur -- again, I don't know that it's germane 10 to this meeting, but we have a meeting, preliminary 11 pre-app set up for Thursday afternoon with the 12 county to talk about the site development plan, and 13 at that point, we hope to get a little bit better 14 handle on, you know, how much are they going to 15 look for water management, you know, what type of 16 water management features. 17 But our biggest change from a water management 18 point of view is the parking area. And that may 19 drive what type of surface we use. It might drive 20 what type of islanding, curbing and things like 21 that, or lack thereof, that we need to do. 22 So, you know, that's really down the road at 23 this point. 24 MR. ARNOLD: Anything else? (Indiscernible) ? 25 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. I'll just add 9 1 that I would like to, you know, have that 30-foot 2 wide vegetative buffer the way it is. 3 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. 4 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Because I do have a 5 pool there. I would like to keep privacy -- 6 MR. ARNOLD: Uh-huh. Sure. 7 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: -- on that side of 8 the piece of property. 9 MR. ARNOLD: Right. Understood. 10 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So, yeah, I mean I 11 would appreciate if you just kept it the way it is. 12 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. To the extent we can. I � ■ 13 mean, if there's Brazilian pepper (indiscernible) 14 going to have to come off. 15 MR. KANT: Yeah, if there's Brazilian pepper 16 (indiscernible) going to be removed. Yeah, we have 17 to. 18 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, take that out, 19 yeah, yeah, yeah. 20 MR. KANT: And then if we have to, we only 21 wind up (indiscernible) . 22 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I (indiscernible) 23 taken out when I -- because it's -- I have 24 breakouts and it's just -- that stuff is very 25 annoying. �1 10 1 MR. ARNOLD: Hey, Norm. 2 MR. KANT: I want to make sure that it's clear 3 in this public meeting, it's not a public hearing, 4 but this public meeting, that we have represented 5 to Mr. Amuloff (phonetic) that that would be a 6 30-foot vegetative buffer. And we have no 7 intention of changing that. 8 I can't say that it's going to be 30.00 -- 30 9 feet, point zero zero inches. It might be, you 10 know, 30 feet and one inch, it might be 29 feet, 11 11 and three-quarters inches, but it's going to be 30 12 feet, especially (indiscernible) . And, ""-, 13 unfortunately, it is so thick in there, until we 14 start doing some clearing, I'm not sure what we're 15 going to find, so. 16 What I wanted to protect against is us having 17 to spend money to plant where there's already good 18 plantings. That's what I wanted to protect 19 against. 20 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Well, it sounds 21 like you like it the way it is now, anyway, so if a 22 minimal amount has to come out because it's 23 foreign, that's what we take out. 24 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. 25 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. 11 1 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And this is your, 2 like, maximum footprint of that parking lot, right? 3 So you may actually decide to build something 4 smaller (indiscernible) . 5 MR. KANT: That's correct. Yeah -- 6 MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, we're in the design stages 7 right now, trying to -- between working with the 8 architect, who the Bridge Center has retained, and 9 trying to do the site design. Like Ed said, once 10 we go to our pre-application meeting with the 11 county staff, we'll be able to go back and refine 12 that. 13 I mean, I can't tell you that we're not going 14 to make some of the -- this is going to be maybe a 15 redesign area, and to make up some of the parking 16 that we may lose here, we may end up putting 17 another tier of parking back here or something, 18 but -- 19 MR. KANT: Yeah, I just -- I want to make it 20 clear that what we're showing here is both what's 21 here now and what we anticipated when this was done 22 in -- in March -- no, in September, three months 23 ago. 24 We may -- we may be able to narrow those down 25 a bit. We want to, because I know we're talking 12 n 1 about changing the traffic flow so that we get more 2 of a one-way type of flow through here. When we do 3 that, we may not need all of this much island, in 4 which case we might be able to pull that in a 5 little bit, but I don't want to make that promise 6 to you now. I just don't know. 7 What I will make the representation to you now 8 is that's 30 feet. 9 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. 10 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. 11 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Sounds good. 12 MR. ARNOLD: All right. Anything else 13 (indiscernible) ? 14 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, just as the 15 Golden Gate Civic Association, we had voted to -- 16 in favor of the concept, and they were good 17 neighbors, and we've appreciated what they've done 18 in making it good, and so we were favorable, and 19 that was, unless there was some objections from 20 residential, but we like the idea. 21 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. Good. 22 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thought it was a 23 good use of (indiscernible) . 24 MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. I think that we've had 25 that dialogue with the county. It makes so much , —"\ 13 1 sense, with the infrastructure that's in place, to 2 build on what's here, and they've been good 3 neighbors for 30 plus years, so that's why we're 4 all pursuing this avenue. 5 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Unless 6 (indiscernible) but I didn't bring the letter and I 7 did look for it quick, but I think we wrote a 8 letter in support (indiscernible) . 9 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes. Yes, we did. 10 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. 11 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) more 12 detail than that if we need it. 13 MR. ARNOLD: Anything else? Vlad, Russell? 14 Okay. Anybody else? 15 Meeting adjourned. 16 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thank you. 17 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I also move 18 (indiscernible) . 19 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thank you. 20 MR. ARNOLD: Good timing, huh? 21 (Recording concluded. ) 22 23 24 25 14 �\ 1 STATE OF FLORIDA 2 COUNTY OF COLLIER 3 4 I, Joyce B. Howell, do hereby certify that: 5 1. The foregoing pages numbered 1 through 13 6 contain a full, true and correct transcript of 7 proceedings in the above-entitled matter, transcribed 8 by me to the best of my knowledge and ability from a 9 digital audio recording. 10 2. I am not counsel for, related to, or 11 employed by any of the parties in the above-entitled 12 cause. n 13 3. I am not financially or otherwise 14 interested in the outcome of this case. 15 16 SIGNED AND CERTIFIED: 17 18 Date: December 21, 2015 Joyce B. Howell 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ►' 'I ►' 1 N II /^ (CHAPTER 8,COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s)must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15)calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s)must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code,Chapter 8 E. I. The sign(s)must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five(5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails,staples,or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post,or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost,or rendered unreadable,the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s l NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY,PERSONALLY APPEARED Sharon Umpenhour t"\ WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER 4-- _a 11411: .► 4, - fA..•r a 25/CPSS-2015-3,NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER,INC. iii., Pt 4 jIt. Q.Grady Minor&Assoc,P.A.,3800 Via Del Rey SIGNATURE OF APPLICA OR AGENT STREET OR P.O.BOX Sharon Umpenhour,Senior Planning Technician Bonita Springs, FL 34134 NAME(TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY,STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 29th day of February 20 16,by Sharon Umpenhour , personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. CN (— a'N' (Signature of Notary Patblic./' (1 {,t>,t tip. Printed Name of Notary Public �*RY,°� � JOANNE JANES My Commission Expires: �° ° MY cok'MISSION I FF 090820 (Stamp with serial number) * * EXPIRES:March 14,2018 �� °rq a��?� 6vndedThruHudoetNataryServices Rev.3/4/2015 CU-PL20150000873 AND PL20150002525/CPSS-2015-3, NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, INC. meow • ty t.0 .' x•`46::.:. ii ��5. ti ohs. •' ': > _ • • • goie FSG:n , , ..A x.., • ,M,q 'a"drift:, . .. - J? bttE; t k if htei GPO,h s • Alitz • e• dY• eELl. .x 1 GradyMinor �� p.r.w.:� .•,1Aftt4,4 11.44 artkmks>Imw ra41941.s,141 f;Nil lagince•a • Land anr,.ur. , llanne•ii Land,.ay:1rchiletiA p.x w.w.YN.wEfl' N•.ry n..a�a,e.>_.�v� iwa+...'...a->,. *Ydialp,se,4*,917 1144 u...i,ed'Afi.+n..rua t9'a5 N»443111,111,431* AGENDA ITEM 9-B Co er Cau ty STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 17,2016 SUBJECT: CU-PL20150000873,NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER APPLICANT/OWNER/AGENT: APPLICANT/OWNER: AGENT: Naples Bridge Center,Inc. Mr. D. Wayne Arnold 5865 Golden Gate Parkway Q. Grady Minor and Associates,P.A Naples,FL 34112 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida,providing for the expansion of an existing Conditional Use which allows a social club in the Estates Zoning District pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.2. of the Collier County Land Development Code(LDC)for property known as the Naples Bridge Center. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject 4.68± acre property is located at 5845 and 5865 Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway between I-75 and Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Please see the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner seeks Conditional Use approval to allow for expansion of the Naples Bridge Center. The proposed expansion will include the adjacent 2.34± acre property located immediately east of the current facility and will expand the existing Naples Bridge Center clubhouse building on the existing site to a maximum size of 15,000 square feet. NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER,CU-PL20150000873 March 4,2016 Page 1 of 10 'TN _—AIflPORTFUWNO ftM0 - ill .: CARILLON lT+$ O Ai 9/1 C 111 1 11 a Alb.1 6P ill iC i z pi 9 5 WI s84 & 2 I li .P., ii I LNIN(iSTDN ROAD �ev �`�,�� ■ Iii_ 1 "T" m m O 0 r>rt U g f •e O I RN IP YMITIErr [ iicii. 1 1 W , g Pe.', INTERSTATE-16 COUNTY BARN ROAD Y 8 1 z {1,R> o 1 O �f ,g t �m .1 g8 kva it .18 Z ti 1 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD M1 ABARBARA 6� ^rL pp • - .JJ`{��,1 q�� - BOULBVARO �. N 1 q 1i 11 '` l (j (SLY BOULEVARD K r -.. 11 9 PLANTATION N 41 Z7Cp e m o A, BANAL L E sp..r� N2 r Q p P �1 m 3:4,,,, 4 0 6,,,,,_D �, `1\ p S S .�4 a 111 ',9,4, ma T NM X11; .\� 4 6 1 �r - - 4 tt- >� AA MR GATEWAY Ag 9 i RI g p 0 CC Scpn --, C.R.951m �.dT s . �R _ N COLLIER BOULEVARD C.R.951 COLLIER BOULEVARD `11 Z . IC NOT To 9C Fa I-. N I !o 2 CO g V 6Ot0 ST $W W g g ---_i 4 e 4 e a a • 0 a - I • a 1 Z N 0 y. I P n a Y iiiiii.ii`:�; _ V 4 4 t Z _ s _'_ "" • I � e e 68a ST SW Q DI Z e K e 0 ■ e e D m > e v s _ T J - . e O e 6 DN J1 '< —1 m 1 � �O Z 5 I a a 5 a a a a a Q s 1p SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD I; t ZONED E,_EST>A'F S . •. - . . ' .-. 'k u I WATER_MANAOEMENTI OPEN SPADE - - I I I 4—MAINTENANCE I t BUILDING II II i if ar ,� k I k EXISTING 15'WIDE I •2.. _" '. '�I•' ,,,...9',,r . .r 30'WIDE TYPE'B' TYPE'B'LANDSCAPE �` a 1/ VEGETATED BUFFER 35 I � - xv3R S t• c.� sue- `it z o.yi.. _.F ,tow ZONED ErESTATE3 I �� ter. ,®ko I TONER ES MtS.: I 1$E. REBIDENTIALi �µ �, , USE. RESIDE1�171AL 3 { i1111111111F1l11t1tlt11111 T,`. - '- IIiI11F11I111l11luI1111iII 1lllllllf 1111 {{ Illtltltltltltltltitlt_ylti { t IiitltltFtltltltliftlt !i� !!/11111111111 CY !!!1{111111111111111 11111Yy 1 I I 644:1441:14,. c „yO a;.r / 2�I '✓/ e I I ExngN; .111 . fi il !1l IA]{ir i1■it1' I 1111111111111{11111111I111i f�+^ /d Itltltltititliititiglitltl Illlilllllll{I �.^ I r� E I if XISTING ',n 0'r s.>s r i':� NAPLES 132!DGE : esi-c%rar_," I ___IA-_ - : . DUMPSTER : ✓ x LOCATION , I F1 (APPROX.) I I 1 EXISTING 2S WIDE TYPED ;i:,,:,-,:. 2S WIDE TYPED'LANDSCAPE BUFFER s DRAINAGE NDSCAPE BUFFS- OUTFALL �`JJ�� — _ i obLDEN4A1gRARKWAY: ' i TOFiV8 4 3 M OU 8.f04GU D Oi2O-ACRES,) -- PR 71ORES tj T�Fl4)7SF � loll) q. N 4647 t �1§ E {�1 A RED XSI= T } AN AI1-1000.9 St�A1.L EE:ST iEk D ANp tF PARK = AWAY FROM�l i,,lOIN�'RORERT# 8 F w tt t lED- PER 1 D '2. tirjoMP �.O; k-[YONTS;A PPROXIMAtE AND FINAl. .,_ 1�—sv l_,V ]ED..._PAR E -_. LQ 17toN WILL•BEogr#3RMtNED AT'PIME OF SOP ^ ' SCALE:1"=60' R 3. RD NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, INC. Vo1° I REVISED 02/04/2016 II GradyMinor "`""""`.:Vt.. MIVI :4 ow a+a�ixcn • iu,w s"^cp"" • 1'gP.FR • aPnaxe.or ulP ie CONbITIONAI USE •" "... .,.m min CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 4..e MnNa 9e"ra:(SP.P1l.iiix . .-.-..,n:vaer.rr Pm MI..xaer,xs _ Fxam 1 xr 1 I 6a,.......11-rrvawv� -..w was oP1w�a.ww�'Mm�"�.w,.x�,wm wsnel.e:a.w 1 The existing Naples Bridge Center was originally approved as a Provisional Use, PU-80-4c, Resolution Number 80-128 on July 8, 1980. The original site consisted of a 2,610 square-foot building and 70 parking spaces. A second Conditional Use, CU-93-13, Resolution Number 94-424 was approved on June 14, 1994 to expand the building to 3,500 square feet and increase the parking to 83 parking spaces. A third Conditional Use, CU-2006-AR-11034, Resolution Number 07-138 was approved on May 22, 2007 to expand the building an additional 3,500 square feet and increase the parking by 50 parking spaces. This proposed building expansion increases the building from 3,500 square feet to 7,000 square feet and increases the parking by 49 spaces for a total of 132 parking spaces. As previously stated, the petitioner proposes to add approximately 2.34± acres to the Naples Bridge Center facility and to expand the existing 3,500 square-foot building by 11,500 square feet to a maximum building area of 15,000 square feet and to increase the parking area by approximately 75 percent. The Conceptual Site Plan depicts the Naples Bridge Center building, parking areas, ingress and egress. The Site Plan also depicts 0.50 acres of native vegetation preserve area, a 25-foot wide Type D right-of-way buffer, a 30-foot Type B buffer along the east property line, and 15-foot wide Type B buffer along the west property boundaries. The preserve area has been strategically located to buffer the residential neighbor to the north. Vehicular access to the site is provided from Golden Gate Parkway. Pedestrian access to the site is provided from a sidewalk along Golden Gate Parkway. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Developed with a single-family residence on an Estates(E)zoning designation East: Developed with a single-family residence on an Estates(E)zoning designation. South: 6-lanes of Golden Gate Parkway, developed with a childcare facility to the south, a single- family residence to the southwest, and a church to the southeast, all on an Estates zoning designation. West: Developed with a single-family residence on an Estates(E)zoning designation. NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER,CU-PL20150000873 March 4,2016 Page 4of10 1 7 III iii '', } 1,..:: '1 . ,I' , .4 ' - - , „ ) i. jolt i I AL 1 SUBJECT ç PROPERTY lbillit , T r t r . - • `GdGra TRW . _ r• .��.. ° ♦ 74 4 W'�7VY fiV/: Y 1 LC'.,v∎County P,,lemv Agora.,,,.PI so r;i t.-. ,�. ism 1—41 f1 AERIAL PHOTO GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The 4.68+ acre subject site is designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan(GGAMP)of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). The companion small-scale GMP amendment proposes to allow the Naples Bridge Center use on the 2.34± acre site containing the existing facility, and for the adjoining site immediately to the east of the current facility,parking,open space and water management. Both 2.34± acre parcels are zoned E, Estates, and are within the Golden Gate Parkway Corridor Management zoning overlay. The westerly 2.34+ acres, containing the existing facility, has a conditional use allowing the Naples Bridge Center. GGAMP Policy 5.2.3 states, "Recognizing the residential nature of the land uses surrounding the 1-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway,as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan,there shall be no further commercial zoning for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER,CU-PL20150000873 March 4,2016 Page 5 of 10 1 i commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above-defined segment." The easterly portion of the subject site is not designated to allow a Conditional Use. However, the companion small-scale GMPA will allow the existing and proposed development and must be adopted in order for the Conditional Use requested with this petition to be approved. Certain applicable Future Land Use Element(FLUE)policies are shown below in italics followed by staff analysis in bold text. FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, surrounding land uses. Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services Section's staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. FLUE Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. FLUE Policy 7.1 The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The one(1) project entrance(existing)shown on the Naples Bridge Center,Inc.,Conditional Use Conceptual Site Plan accesses Golden Gate Parkway, a minor arterial (urban and rural) roadway as identified on the Collier 2025 Functional Classification Map of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan.] FLUE Policy 7.2 The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Because of the small size of the Naples Bridge Center project,loop roads or internal accesses are not feasible.The Conditional Use Conceptual Site Plan shows an entrance into the parking area and drive aisles.] FLUE Policy 7.3 All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [No proposed interconnections with adjoining properties to the project are planned or shown on the Conditional Use Conceptual Site Plan. Interconnections to the parcels to the east,west and north of the subject site are not feasible, because these parcels are all developed with single- family residential homes.] FLUE Policy 7.4.' The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [No Bicycle and Pedestrian facilities are noted on the Conditional Use Conceptual Site Plan. As no LDC deviation is requested, sidewalks will be required per the LDC.] CONCLUSION Based on the above analysis, staff finds the subject petition NOT consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan; however,the petition may be deemed consistent IF the companion GMP amendment is adopted and becomes effective. The Conditional Use NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER,CU-PL20150000873 March 4,2016 Page 6 of 10 Resolution needs to contain an effective date concurrent with the effective date of the companion GMPA. Transportation Element: The project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan,which states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element(FLUE)affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts f the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links(roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume;and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3%of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways." The proposed development will generate a projected 31± AM peak hour and 411 PM, peak direction trips for the proposed facility on the adjacent local roadway, Golden Gate Parkway. Staff notes that 24± AM and 31± PM of the peak trips result from the proposed additional square footage requested. The adjacent local roadway, Golden Gate Parkway, is a six-lane divided roadway and has a current service volume of 3,300 trips, with a remaining capacity of approximately 1,910 trips between 1-75 and Santa Barbara Boulevard; and is currently at LOS "C" (Level of Service"C")as shown in the 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Report(AUIR). Therefore, staff finds that the proposed project does not significantly impact adjacent roadway links. There is sufficient capacity to accommodate this Conditional Use within the 5-year transportation planning period and the petition is consistent with the applicable policies of the transportation element. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 0.40 acres of native vegetation are required to be retained for the Conditional Use. ANALYSIS: Before any Conditional Use recommendation can be offered to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), the Collier County Planning Commission(CCPC) must make findings that: 1) approval of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER,CU-PL20150000873 March 4,2016 Page 7 of 10 property of uses in the same district of neighborhood; 2) all specific requirements for the individual Conditional Use will be met; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following matters,where applicable: } 1. Section 2.03.01.B.1.c. of the LDC permits conditional uses in the Estates (E) zoning district. The requested use for the social club use is permitted as a conditional use in the Estates (E) zoning district, subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00, Conditional Use Procedures, of the LDC. 2. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management Plan (GMP). This request may be deemed consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan upon approval of the companion GMP Amendment. The proposed setbacks are in compliance with the LDC. The Estates zoning district requires a 75-foot front setback along Golden Gate Parkway. The existing front setback ranges from 33 to 41 feet and is a legal nonconforming setback due to a right-of-way taking for the widening of Golden Gate Parkway. The original building met the setback requirements when it was developed, and the building addition will meet the current 30-foot side setback and 75-foot rear setback. The project will be required to undergo the site development plan review process to ensure compliance. 3. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. As depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan, the ingress and egress to the site will be provided through an existing entrance off of Golden Gate Parkway. 4. The effect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare,economic or odor effects. If approved, the proposed use should have minimal impact on neighboring properties in relation to glare, economic or noise effects. To mitigate for any noise or glare impacts to the neighbors,the applicant will provide a 30-foot wide Type B landscape buffer along the east property line and a 15-foot wide Type B landscape buffer along the west property line. Along the north property line, the applicant has provided an approximately 90-foot wide preserve area. To the south, the Estates zoned residence is separated from the subject site by Golden Gate Parkway, a six-lane divided road with a landscaped median. 5. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER,CU-PL20150000873 €_ March 4,2016 Page 8 of 10 The Naples Bridge Center facility is compatible with the surrounding area. The Naples Bridge Center building is one-story, which is compatible with the surrounding one-story residential development. This Conditional Use property is located in the neighborhood of several other properties with Conditional Uses: five churches, a child care facility and David Lawrence Center are located within 1/2 mile of the Naples Bridge Center. Based on the information provided and with the appropriate mitigations, it appears that the proposed Conditional Use is an appropriate use of the subject site NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING(NIM): The agent/applicant duly noticed and held the required NIM on December 14, 2015. For further information,please see Attachment: Transcripts of the Naples Bridge Center Conditional Use and GMPA Neighborhood Information Meetings. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on February 26,2016. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CU-PL20150000873, Naples Bridge Center to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions of approval which are carried over from the previous Conditional Use: 1. The Naples Bridge Center shall not lease the facilities which are the subject of this Conditional Use. 2. The applicant shall incorporate the outdoor lighting standards outlined in Golden Gate Area Master Plan Policy 5.1.1 into the site plan during the SDP review process. 3. The applicant shall locate the dumpster a minimum of 40 feet away from any adjacent residential property line. Attachments: Attachment A: Proposed Resolution Attachment B: Resolution Number 80-128 Attachment C: Resolution Number 94-424 Attachment D: Resolution Number 07-138 Attachment E: Attachment F: Transcript of the Naples Bridge Center Neighborhood Information Meeting—December 14,2015 NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER,CU-PL20150000873 March 4,2016 Page 9 of 10 PREPARED BY: . :.4 t I •UCO NANCY T D A{ H, AICP,PLA DATE PRINCIP& 'LA►r ER ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: /2 -N6 Z a 3'16. RAYMO V.V. BELLOWS,ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING a VISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION 2 r MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION APPROVED BY: .///i4 ES FRE CH,DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT :A 3/346 DAVID S. WILKISON, P.E. DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER,CU-PL20150000873 February 22,2016 Page 10 of 10 RESOLUTION 2016- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE WHICH ALLOWS A SOCIAL CLUB IN THE ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.01.B.1.c.2, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER LOCATED AT 5865 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ]CU-PL20150000873] WHEREAS,the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses;and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 80-128,the Board of County Commissioners approved a Provisional Use for the establishment of the Naples Bridge Club pursuant to Section 14-1D of the then-current Zoning Regulations, subject to a number of conditions;and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-424, the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County approved a Conditional Use for the expansion of the Naples Bridge Center in accordance with a conceptual master plan, subject to a number of conditions;and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 07-138, the Board of Zoning Appeals approved a Conditional Use for the expansion of the existing Bridge Center to increase the size of the building and add parking spaces,subject to a number of conditions; and WHEREAS, the Naples Bridge Center, lie. has petitioned the Board of Zoning Appeals to add 2.34 acres to the existing Conditional Use;and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of allowing this requested expansion of the existing Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.2, of the Collier County Land Development Code which allows social and fraternal organizations in the Estates [15-CPS-01495/1238841/1]66 Page 1 of 3 Naples Bridge Center/CU-PL20150000873 2/12/16 Attachment A zoning district on the property hereinafter described, and the Collier County Planning Commission has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 10.08.00.D. of the Land Development Code;and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,that: Petition CU-PL20150000873, filed by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, Inc., representing the Naples Bridge Center, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit "A," is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates Zoning District, for a social and fraternal organization in accordance with the Conceptual Site Nan attached hereto as Exhibit "B," subject to the previously required conditions set forth in Resolution No. 07-138, which is attached as Exhibit C. Exhibits "A,""B" and"C" are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution hereby supersedes and replaces Resolution No. 07-138, excepting the conditions set forth therein, which are incorporated by reference into this Resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective on the date that the Growth Management Plan amendment in Ordinance No. becomes effective. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super-majority vote, this i day of ,2016. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCK,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA By: By: ,Deputy Clerk DONNA FIALA,Chairman [15-CPS-01495/1238841/1]66 Page 2 of 3 Naples Bridge Center/CU-PL20150000873 2/12/16 Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Exhibit A—Legal Description Exhibit B—Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit C—Resolution No. 07-138 [I5-CPS-01495/1238841/Ij 66 Page 3 of 3 Naples Bridge Center/CU-PL20150000873 2/12/16 S EXHIBIT A Naples Bridge Center,Inc. Conditional Use Legal Description le THE EAST 150' OF TRACT 75, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 30 AND THE WEST 150' OF TRACT 82, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 30, PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER E '$ COUNTY,FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 82 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES,UNIT 30,PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58,PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA;THENCE RUN ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 82,NORTH 89'31'20" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET;THENCE SOUTH I j 00°28'40" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 680.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 82;THENCE RUN ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 82 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 75 OF SAID PLAT, SOUTH 89'31'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°28'40" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 680.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 75 OF SAID PLAT;THENCE RUN ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 89°31'20° EAST, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. I a. CONTAINING 4.68 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. i I I i .•. •. .+ • i i f wA0NS 1 I I "'�—MAINTENANCE I • I I 1 BUILDING I t I1 I i H - . I I I EXISTING 15'WIDE - I TYPE IV LANDSCAPE ■ i 3�WbE TYPE B' 1 BUFFER x`',' I ( VEGETATED BUFFER I ' I I I ► e I I I 1 1:F.1411,11:14;;;{;;;;; I I 1,1 tI'tli•IIIltlI Il1ltllllI I I I i'tlllitlll'tll Itiiiiflit. I 1 1111111111 Ilt 1 1)h 1 1 I .1,'1111 1111111111111 1111. I I I I I'°111/1111111 11th 1 1 * 0 I >_____111.1 I_ I 1 - 1 1 I t} t1 I.ft--1,:;—'. —7...:—::—..74.:—_—_—:—.7.—:—:::::.—:—:—: 1 j LOCATION i t (APPR°Oa J I EXISTING 25'WIDE TYPE'0' '{. 2g WIDE TYPE TY LANDSCAPE BUFFER DRAINAGENDSCAPE BUFFS' OUTFALL ' t"!',k ' c 'II ,,, , i` �T{n „,;.*4#1,, h 2 ``r r-..' °��> s'i•*fir, �6`` 'nelir "3t a$41,1' -,4 1 Ski '.+ i '7ci ui�k4 'i4 :h to e3, '.,,,le..M n{ 4":/n €.� 1. fi, ` 4,..P. ' Z i•. }!■t t. ``y�t i• 3 a '� �V`,* r �g'f`.y°'i"r .. '�3'ry�` r 46 r } r�iv _�$f s R $' t. EEt �,.� la 1 't 6 °tl' Qt 7b r.:`Iv.�N -. � Y;`' .�4� "t'� ' a sus?; a �4,,,-1 �. '. ...�`.*,.-,1'r" +t�t'tp $GAml.=eV LEGEND r :OPUS&RIDO& C3'N}TER, INC. ix REVISED 02/04/2016 ®GradyMlnor `"'""' """"" "°.,, a+ISidnr.l . Lai.n=.=w Runes • 1.4144•7.i1diecu COMMUNAL USE CONCEPTUAL SITE PUN •..oa..941rJiw ..•anvr..r...... Mtq..flrltaon sOD I a 1" I 6y, e,..., mt.ul...-wwls rr.>;x nw1IRII*..S*.m.Ad Mains nane,{t.•nr . EXHIBIT C 1 of 22 P120150000873 REV 1 1. R RESOLUTION 07.138 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF • COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE WHICH LC ALLOWS A SOCIAL CLUB IN THE ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.04,03, TABLE 2, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, LOCATED AT 5863 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. 1 Y WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of' t Florida, and Chapter 125,Florida Statutes,has conferred on Collier County the power to establish,coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public;and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code { (Ordinance No.2004-41,as amended)which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance • establishing�regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses;and i S to WHEREAS,by Resolution No.80-128,a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A,"the Board of County Commissioners approved a Provisional Use for the establishment t of the Naples Bridge Club pursuant to Section 14-1D of the then-current Zoning Regulations, ( l subject to a number of conditions;and i WHEREAS,by Resolution No.94-424,a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B,"the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County approved a Conditional Use for the t. expansion of the Naples Bridge Center in accordance with a conceptual master plan,subject to a number of conditions;and WHEREAS, the Naples Bridge Center, Inc., has filed Petition No. CU-2006-AR- 11034,requesting an expansion to the existing conditional use to allow a building addition of i 3,500 square feet and 50 additional parking spaces;and l WHEREAS,the Board of Zoning Appeals,being the duly appointed and constituted r planning board for the area hereby affected,has held a public bearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided,and has considered the advisability of allowing this requested . expansion of the existing Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.04.03,Table 2 of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates zoning district on the property hereinafter described, and the Collier County Planning Commission has found as a matter of fact x (Exhibit "C")that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters aPP required by said regulations snd in accordance with Subsection i 10.08.00.D.of the Land Development Code;and Page 1 of 2 t 1 I i ` I EXHIBIT C 2 of 22 fi WHEREAS, all interested patties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. rf NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County,Florida,that: Petition CU-220-AR-11034, filed by Joss Nageon de Lashing, P.B. of Gulfahore Engineering,Inc.,representing the Naples Bridge Center, Inc.,with respect to the PrtY g; hereinafter described in Exhibit"D,"is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.04.03, Table 2 of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates Zoning District,for a social club in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit"E,"subject to the previously required conditions set forth in Resolution No.80- ! 128 and Resolution No. 94-424, copies of which are attached hereto, together with the conditions set forth in Exhibit"F"attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution hereby supersedes and replaces both Resolution No. 80-128 and Resolution No.94-424,excepting the conditions set forth therein,which are incorporated by reference into this Resolution,and that the remainder of Resolution No.80-128 end Resolution No.94-424 are accordingly repealed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion,second and super-m41ority vote,thia,2 2 day of ,2007. ATTEST: DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA By Q1..1��j � O.0_ By: /- -: Attest as W 04 �'f lerk ,r cS a n: signature oel. is ii1i.;11/► T•'. ! A.KI .w g •- ,t County Attorney Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT C 3of22 •• p p l�p • R-80-12$ ftrr1�.IC[, ' 3 � ESOLUT..Y .9N J11L1� 1980 • RELATING TO PETITION NO. pU-80-4C . UCQ . FOR pAovx6IONAL O$E OF PROPERTY IYERE- TNAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, . gLORIpA. • Wf5REAS, the Legislature of the State. of Florida in Chapter 125 and 163, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all ' • counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the pjrotection of the publiat and • I WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Comprehensive zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for divisions of the County, , n • the zoing of particular geographic of provisional useat and among which is the granting ,; WHEREAS, the Coastal Area Planning Commission: being the . appointed and constituted planning board for t t eres • duly PPp hereby affected, has held,a.publio hearing after notice as in regulations made And'd provided, and has considered the ad- • i. 1 �' $ ZOne for visability of Provisional Use 6: in a _----_'- the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter • of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regula- tions and in accordance with Section.14-1D of .the Zoning Rage- ' lations for the Coastal Area planning District; and I WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity F to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled and $' the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County 1 Commissioners of Collier County, . Florida, that the petition of Naples Bridge Club s with respect to the property hereinafter described as: East 150 feet of Tract 75, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates as described in Plat Book 7, Page 57, Public Records of Collier County, Florida EXHIBIT"A" • Pout Pages • a.n� nf. 2 S EXHIBITC , 4of22 • • 0 g be and the same is hereby approved for Provisional Use , 6_ F the .w.--.j -- zoning district for asocial glob g subject to the following conditions: - • , • i ii (SEE ATTACHED) 3 Ii i BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that thss resolution be recorded a in the minutes of this Board• 4 offered the foregoing resole- ; commissioner Nimer a oededby Comnisaar tin and aro'ved its adoption, sec 1 and upon roll call, the vote we AYE S: Commissioners Brown, Wiser and Pistor k. NAYS: Cosmiseionera•Archer'and Wex:ael 4 ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: None 3 ABSTENTION:. None g 19 $d g rBone this 8 __._ QaY of Jul. v • • BOARD'OF COUNSY.COMMXSSXONERS A COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA . . . BY:' ' �1 � ee• GTAN/ g • ./ . ' 4 i • • x i 3 3 { ExHIBIT Cry r 4:3 • n, i 1' • a ' ' • I I • { I Y Sof 22 i. PI'd F' 4 .1 iI, ,. a 1 , • •• . 1 ..i . . p ;jig h i ' q a I• •.P 'y•H.1 „'r • .4 { ... 1{I\{� , • i '„ .•' 1,{i�••{ � i is r • • I • 5.. C 4 41-4 JJ I,,• ,:,- • 7I' •I1 1 ' .t i• . • ,41� ty •• {1. 1 4• • • �sL ):1. 1• • ,. ,• •• i a s •1 4717:„._.I:IL::..,',11''''.*' ...--.1— '..It.i. ,':I. :i"........ ::::.. .. '. . • • ■• .. • ~ of 1 5� I . I -r • • • • 0 ,v1 , : • :.. •ti•.: •..�• ••.:tea•-Je. :' '. :y; '.. • I'• I . ... — ..z.e:i....:1.....,..4::...... ...1 a., ..,:,........... ;:14: :.. ::: ••••••:..., :.::::1•••• . . .. . -;:t ...,,..:-' 1%. - -• -.--- — r• , 1• -- --- -- -- 4 -- ,_ , . 4 I 1 1 EXH1BITC 1 6oi22 • . . , . , . . . ! . . . A . P . , 4 . ATTACHENT 1 . . c . . , . . . ' 1 . . 1. Public water required. i . i 2. Comply with fire codes and hydrants. f g ' I 3. Final site drainage plan shall be submitted to 1 . County gngineer for review and approval. . . ,.. 4. All signs,ahall be approved by the Zoning Director. !i 5. Waviaional use expires one year from date of approval k unless construction has commenced. , 4 6. Any expansion requires eite plan approval. 1 ' . 1 • . . • 1 . • I . 1 . 4 i 1 ' s • See R-80-128 i i . q . t . 4 . 1 11 . s . . s • . s . 4 . 1 i . I . • IE . . . . , ! . . . I . '1. . •: • ' , ' . . . 11 • !, . 6 . , . . ,. . . . . 5 • I . . .• i , . 1 . ., ,•1 . . T . . . .. .. ,, . , . . . . 1 . .: . 1 . 1 . . . . . .! , 4 'f 1 .. 1 EXHIBIT C • 7 of 22 •, t RESOLUTION 94-j A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE EST7d1LISHEENT OF CONDITIONAL USE •2" IN THE "EI ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 2.2.3.3 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVEIAP'MENT CODE POR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 371ST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. F 3 litfEES_As, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, hat conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and ' enforce coning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the county pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which includes a ' Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has ooneidered the advisability of Conditional Use *2• of Subsection 2.2.3.3 in an "E• Estates zone for a social organisation on the r4 property hereinafter described, and has found es a natter of fact (Exhibit •A°) that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made concerning all applicable t• matters required by said regulations and in accordance with ' Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning com"iesion and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all batters presented. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY TUE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida that -1- EXHIBIT"B" FOUR PAGES i 1 EXHIBIT C t 8 of 22 / z.. . . r C ) The petition filed by Fred Rethgeber representing Naples Bridge Canter, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter t described as: The East 130 feet of Tract 75, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7', Page 58, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 3 be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use "2" of 1 Subsection 2.2.3.3 of the "E" Estates zoning district for expansion 4 . of the Naples Bridge Center in accordance with the conceptual 8 1 Master Plan (Exhibit "B") and subject to the following conditional r' 1. the current Planning Manager may approve ninon change. €, in the location, siting, or height of buildings, t structures, and improvements authorized by the ! Conditional Use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this Conditional Use application, or s machanges to the cite•plan submitted as part of this application, sball require the submittal of a new E Conditional Use application, and shall comply with all I a applicable county ordinances in effect at the tine,of t submittal, including Division 3.3, Site bevelopnant ' Plan Review and approval, of the collier County Land rc Develop4ent Coda (Ordinance No. 91-102). z 2. This project .hall be required to nest all County ordinances in effect at the tine final construction t documents are submitted for development approval. 3. Detailed paving, grading, site drainage, and utility plans shall be submitted to Project Plan Review for ": review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approve' of the proposed construction a in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by ; Project Plan Review. I a. Prior to site Development Plan approval, a letter from the Collier County Public Health unit approving the ! " existing septic, system capacity shall be provided to Project Plan Reviw. 5. all native vegetation (i.e., pines, pelnattos, etc.) 1 that fall within the interior landscape islands or can be retained for exterior or perimeter islands shall be retained. 6. No new median openings on Golden Gate Parkway shall be provided to serve this project. 7. arterial level street lighting shall be provided by the Petitioner at the project entrance prior to the issuenae of a Certificate of occupancy for the I expanded building. a a. A minimum radius of S0 feet shall ba provided at both s sides of the entrance drive. Collier County Transportation Services reserves the right to require i an additional westbound right turn lane if warranted 1 by operational conditions. 1 3 I 7 I i i I EXHIBIT C 9 of 22 r I IE P i 9. An additional 40 feet of depth along the entire k frontage or the subject property shall be reserved for future road right-of-way purposes. No expansion of g rg the existing drainfield shall be permitted within the 40 feet of depth. # 10. Per the Collier County Land Development Code, all g prohibited exotic species shall be removed from the g site prior to the issuance of a Certificate of b Occupancy. c g 11. The proposed draft well shall provide a minimum of 500 g gallons per minute of water flow ( aim*:e: NFPA 1231 and Collier County Ordinance Ito. 42-72). 1 12. The Naples Bridge Center, Ina., shall not lease the facilities which are the subject of this Conditional Use to other organisations.for a purpose different than that which is the purpose of the Naples bridge 3 Canter, Inc., in its articles of incorporation. g • f 13. The Naples Bridge Center Inc., agrees to participate 1 in the cost of constructing an adequate potable water distribution transmission line along Golden Gate ParXway at such time as Collier county undertakes such 1 a capital project. SR IT FURTRER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. Commissioner Morrie offered the foregoing z 1 Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by Casmissioner e voto■ and upon roll call, the vote war t AYES! Comsisaioner Norris, Commissioner Yolpet Coseissioner Saunders, commissloner Matthews and Coasisaioner Constmntine NAYS: I ASSERT AND NOT VOTISO: 6 ABSTENTION1 Done this 14th day of June_ , 1994. / I cot= YO APPEALS. OA .*II WMA: COLLI COVI�TY, �•�ypA ;'by •~v l` SY, /wfj"'�rr i !12'1'68 i. 414„,.:..4.• �'7 47 NP, .7:�{'s i r�a3ccitTs;" +xr t 1 Ar Q 4e_ PORN AND LEOAL... 1pV ENCY: s AsSxsTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY CU-93-13 RESOLUTION/11693 1 1 • A . -3- i . 1 1 EXHIBIT C 10 of 22 r • li • ;11 I • ' if j if s..••�' F 14111111 .. ii c 3 I,. iLl ,-, SI _ r 4 �i'g — -h J _• ' i r 4 1 r J i - RI M - M ! r old 1 t I ; L us if w T ,. 1• •.•'a r _. 1 1 1. ISMAIIMOIMID 3 i 1 •. L. EXHIBIT C It of 22 • FINDINGS OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2006-AR-11034 The following facts are found: I. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use, 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes /No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular _. _ _. reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,trafnflow .. _.. and control,and access in case of fire or catastrophe: • Adequate ingress&egress Yes / .No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare,economic or odor effects: t/No affect or • Affect mitigated by<text> Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes /No Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,with stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. DATE: LI- t.170e1 CHAIRMAN: LA EXHIBIT°G" g I • . , EXHIBIT C 12 of 22 . , . • i • . • . . . y. • . . . . .. • . . . . . f. , . • ' . . . ,. FINDrNG OF FACT I. . ' BY . • . • 1 . i • COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. 5 t . . . FOR . 5 5 ' A CONDITIONAL US B PEIrtiON • i FOR • 1 . . . i . . CU4006-AR-11034 . 11 The following facts are found: • [: I. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. . . 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will ;1 • not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district ox neighborhood ,. . 1 • because of: -,1 A. Consistency with the'Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: I., Yes' v‹-No 1 • i . * B. • .Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon.with particular , . , . • reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow I - . . • .- and control,and access in case of fire or catastrophe: I . . . • 1, . Adequate ingress&egress i 1 • • . • i , • : Yes V No ... . i . . • I . . • •' C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare,economic or bdor . r, 1 effects: • . , . . . . . 1. . . f4o affect or . - Affect mitigated by ' , li • Affect cannot be mitigated • . 1 ' I D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: • k 11 . a ,• . ' Compatible use within district i I . . Yes Based on the above findings,this conditional use.should,with stipulations,(copy attached) g, . - (should not)be recommended for.a.gprOval. . . s----11 h 4_. .' DATE: 4 II ''ito / • MEMBER: (-5>-&—si 5401 . • :E. . . . . EXHIBIT "C" - , . • . . •. ... . . I , . 1 1 t -- - — . -- - 1 ■ . F.)CHLEHT C . . . 13 of 22 I : • I . . . . . . • • • ' • , . • . - . • FINDING OF FACT • BY ' • COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION; . FOR ' • A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION • . , FOR .. ' CU-2006-AR-11034 , • The following facts are found: - 1. Section 1042,00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in.the same district or neighborhood . because of: : 1 A. Consistency with the Land Dev Opment Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes• No ___... .., _ ' B. • Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular 4' reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow - • . and control,and access in case of fire or catastrophe: .. ** , Adequate ingress&egress ,. • • . • • • . . ' . Yes /No • . i . . . . . • .C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare,economic or Odor effects - • . i • __ZNo affect or • Affect mitigated by . ! • Affect cannot be mitigated . . • ,:. • D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: - • Compatible use within district • • . Yes /"...-No . • . Based on the above fmdings,this conditional use should,with stipulations, copy attached) • (should not)be recommended for approvaL . .... DATE: 9'1:0/ • MEMBER: . , A A 6..0 -twkd-1 1417' . . • EXHIBIT "C" . • f. • EXHIBIT C 14 of 22 - . ' FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR $. A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2006-AR-11034 4 i f: The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use, 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: i. A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: t Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control,and access in case of fire or catastrophe: • : Adequate ingress&egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare,economic or odor effects: XNo affect or Affect mitigated by • Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Ye3K No • Based on the above'Endings,this conditional use should,with stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. `` DDATE:_ ff T'~ /5-07 MEMB EXHIBIT"C" . EXHIBIT C k 15 of 22 FINDING OF FACT - 1 BY i ' COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION x FOR . CU-2006-AR-11034 T The following facts are found: I. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. i 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of A. Consistency with the Land velopment Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control,and access in case of fue or catastrophe: 4 I Adequate ingress&egress Yes No C. Affec neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare,economic or odor g effec No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated r D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within distri r 1 Yes No . Based on the above findings,this conditional use should, 'th stipulations,(copy attached) i (should not)be recommended for approval. i . , DATE: \I \O • c MEMBER EXHIBIT"C" ` • i 1 4 EXHIBIT C • 16 of 22 • • FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2006-AR-11034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land.Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood J. because of: A. Consistency with the Land D opment Code and Growth Management Plan: i = Yes No , B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control,and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress&egress Yes No C. Affects ne' boring properties in relation to noise,glare,economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by • Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No { Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,with stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. 104 _ DATE: 7'' ` if o 7 . MEMBER: • EXHIBIT"C° 4 i EXHIBIT C 17of22 . .. .•1 E FINDING OF FACT E BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2006-AR-11034 , The following facts are found: :. ; 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: • • A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management PIan:/ Yes V No • B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control,and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress&egress - `/ i Yes " No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare,economic or odor , effe s: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district V/ Yes No • ' Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,wi , stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. f DATE: +)1 MEMBER: 1 "71'7- EXHIBIT "C" 1 EXHIBIT C ' 18 of 22 a FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION y` FOR t . A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2006-AR-11034 The following facts are found: I. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of 7 A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes V No Y B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control,•and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress&egress Yes %/ , No • C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare,economic or odor effects: ✓ No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. • Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: • Compatible use within district • E t Yes ✓ No Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,with stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. . DATE: 1- /7-y, 7 MEMBER:__1!,Q� EXHIBIT"C" EXHIBIT C 19 of 22 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2006-AR-11034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will. not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: is Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow f. and control,and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress&egress Yes V" No • • C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare,economic or odor effects: 1/ No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes Y No Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,with stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. DATE: 19 0 1 MEMBER•_ �?'!i?.a- ��C EXHIBIT"C" • F , t _ ..... i J i EXHIBIT C 20 of 22 . .t. . 1 i I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: . I . . . . . . ........ . . i.' . . • . . . . . I . .. 1 . . . . . . • ..- • • . . . I • . . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION • . . • . . (O.R 1574, .PG. 943) . • THE EAST-150 FEET OF TRACT 75;.GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 30, ACCORDING l'a PLAT *N PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 5B, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. .. . 11 ,. . . CONTAINING 2.04 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. . . • • —. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS NO RESERVATIONS OF RECORD, t t I • • . ' . • . I . • I. ii- . .,.' . i . . i i • ,:t . . i. 1 • . 1 . . . . • . . I . • • . 41 , • li '$ ; 1 .•! I1 • EXHIBIT"D" . 1 .... ..., 3 i f'. . . 1 lr t 1 t t EXHIBIT C 21 Of 22 . 1 t ligi V , it I !g:1 1 RESIDENTIAL • I N. lik M aven Law\ IESTATES-E•ZONINGJ mlYPENZ, ii I lil 1 g .• . • .4 . . •.. • ..• pi-:-.--: i 1 3 i r. '• . l• • •■ • • • • ■ . ill / 411I • I 1 . wool* . an* •• • 4i4f • 1 le I 1 / ••IUC I ! i I ! I .I non ...717m :0,0.41%0 k ik . ' P . i Fril . . . . . .% ...1...' Illiiii 1111 ' I .. ,.. .........•••...... ..1 i 1 • 1 i I . 1 I 111111 i Ili 1 L‘a LIN ' II / i „m.,..,„„-;„Nt'1,3'...':Al•ii'''''P.I'i4••'• ,'• i' .'"):'`"et.1''.=%`;;',4,....44,...4.•..'•:•:?'' -.,C it ulentii h ig li t 1 s 4 111 • :. ... ; .... . .. . •i, iu Li i i II .. ,,.....:,.....:.. ..... .. , 4, Nil 12 -cE 2 _ a f ri 11 ki I! 1 1 AC La al a !II IM M ,f, is if 1 mnmmic tom ' % -',_. ''''-. ' • -. k.. 5-1 ..I 0 .. r ' '.:..-.L.:...ii'1 • ,..11:;.: , ■ ill it t 1 a E . . , „ "`.4 -•. - iv: . ; % c , • -...• : . CZ ...: It k ______ ""rtvwegTerran*Ince .. ..-;:i'1•.;:::.. '4..41,..-.....::•.4..0.....' 1.......t'' 1 • '. Vi• i 11; ; II alb; • '1 ''',' • '.■ Mr' ''4^11 It. rill' A !.ik&TIC. .•.. .• '..'.• . .... ii- ' '‘. I III 1 RESIDE W NTIAL .• • -' ' .%,„,....... i !. •".” 1 ts,.. at • 'ESTA7ES-040We] $. 111 4 f.:,...:•••,,,:i .',,Ara.;:•73•. '1'6,L'1"...1" I . .* 1 s .1 -.'T.,-:....;;-4-=.::..t.'". ".=.;> pi--- II L• ,' II ;S. ...4.:41.tl..:i.f. •s 5.2" .§...k..:,-it-;'s w ' :,r!Ile!' • 1 : t,,.:,.,'..,':'‘,.•p'.';irW,$.:•/,•1.:. - IA . ' 1 *1 Lif;14gg' 1 ...1W.' , .r. V‘•v...•. ••• ' UIIII i, ••7,•,•1•••••• . '■•••-s4 6.,•- - I ' I 1 • 1 ritril 11 ,,,, .,..,,....,. ..".,.....,,,.,..si, ,.. RESIDENTIAL I &MI.:•1;.. ,„,—.-• ''' ,.2.: . ,re'-;', ,.....1.. ,§&722.Xq.. qinj f•i IESTATES-E-ZONING1 !I ,1: o. HI : ,. .,..,...., ,.. . . 4 '1 •••;: . • ro, •;i'.',.• • l• i • "1 i r!i l Uit ii 1 #, ' * .1' "."—antsas•i''.1.•''" 1.. ..z, -.....4::::,;.•:r.:".Ako• ,•„,,...t . ..,i ; I I 1.1 : ,,. 1 r If . :, :4:•,...%Ir-"111:71F• '':1•.'-,1"-', 1111 C'- 1 l'•• t. 4.,.4:?t • -1t,-_-. Iji :. 4(,' = ..1.-•••,c: '' ".- I; i..--71'il P*WagnY !Ii I . .. :,,.,,;,..... ,„...,........ *.4 WO POICLOND MOIR ,1.11.;..-.?,:aMai.;;;;:::; .:•s.1:./. Ili! i. LAAM•11•4401 Fr,(G.•-•,••••''''' . .'.•V>•••••i••• ..111 i gi ki n .., ......, .,..,..,,I...,r,,,,...,...A.,..,.....:.. ,4 .,§1:::'; 'i. 1. ).''''.',r•N'. .t:' I it III Ili t Illri. - I'4,' ...::.......i. - I II/ 1. •"........ME .- •• •■ ' IETIAC y..., ,• • .••. . - 1 Miff LINE-TRACT ;1'4./0„., ;0,........ j',. :Pt 71 BOLDEN GAIT—, ;;Zi dr .i'ti,j;::.-.•. P-, TM'," •S''''`.4:;.-tk s' '' 1 ill I i g PW.A...... ,. . ESTATE 1,VW At I PR. t ti,. ,v...,•,,t1 irsuem• • ,o67 Cquit,r.., .441.r.ttg,L,'' .-1;1411 ••• • . * ., ,3poospr. 1 r, -, .94i1 1' : ;'''. .,,3. 5L.74, 5, in Ill.,01 i ofiltAeit • 0iii • , .v tilft. iii :flit:: 17,9:1: k 1 t.m....z i %::-. . g 1 il 1 ' eremais 4 I POMP= S , LoGallOm- 1 . .• ncoD■MV ; ;g 1111 11: 111"91i1 1, •[Li/..• -til il I Viagatilmi tza I I., •,illITIMil r, mmainus ' — :1,,:;!1' -diii . . 1 Type-D• Iiiill i 7 aunts Ft/0X_ " . i:- ,lit;::. -2.1111111:::ei I; iL 0 .--— _._ —.. -- 11.- -. en= , . am .,..;A:1 __..ftra•-fleagum9-.— — :. " . —— , 0 t I I iiiiiiiir k at ___ If 1 li I $ 1 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 1 I 1 -iliii , 1, . . .. f . . . ..,. ..."--" • . ' - . ...,,.. 1 ._,., —.....--- --.....- . . ...— • 1 ___-_.--..........• i i, 1 EXHIBIT C 22 of 22 CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOR CU-2006-AR-11034 ' 3 1. The Naples Bridge Center shall not lease the facilities which are the subject of this Conditional Use. d hhh i S 2, The applicant shall incorporate the outdoor lighting standards outlined in Golden Gate Area Master Plan Policy 5.1,1 into the site plan during the SDP review process. 3. The applicant shall locate the dumpster a minimum of 40 feet away from any adjacent ( t residential property line. a EXHIBIT"F" } G:Current/Gundlach/Conditional Uses/Naples Bridge Center/Exhibit"F"Conditions 423-07 3 • R-80-123 w-, �,Vr , FLEsovT,.z .oN J11L10140 • RELATING TO PETITION NO. PU-80-4C _FOR `,� . . OR PROVISIONAL U$E OF PROPERTY HERE- ! • INAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, . FLORIDA. $ Legislature of- the State. of Florida in WHEREAS, the g g Chapter 125 and 163, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all F counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and f • enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary , for the protection of the publin; and ursuant thereto has adopted a WHEREAS, the County p x Ordinance establishing regulations for Comprehensive Zoning 1 eo ra hic divisions of the County, • the zoning of particular g $ 5 P among which is the granting of provisional user,; and 1 • WHEREAS, the Coastal Area Planning Commission; being the • • duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area $ 1 hereby affected, has held.a public hearing after notice as in 1 said regulations made and p rovided, and has considered the ad- $ zone for 1 G. in a' f visability Of Provisional Use • the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter • of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been said regale applicable matters required by made concerning all aPP u- bons and in accordance with Section.14-1D of the Zoning Re g 1 District; and lations for the Coastal Area Planning WHEREAS, all interested parties .have been given 1: to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled and 31 the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County sioners of Collier County, -Florida, that the petition of • . Commie Naples Bridge Club $ with respect to the property hereinafter described as: East 150 feet of 30, Golden Gate Estates as described in Plet BOOk7 Page57, publicRecordsof $ Collier County, Florida g f EXHIBIT"A" Attachment B Four Pages nAee 1, of 2 be and the same is hereby approved for Provisional Use of the E zoning district for a social club subject to the following conditions: • (SEE ATTACHED) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. resolu- offered the foregoing • Cocmnissioner Wimer tion and moved its adoption, seconded by Commisser and upon roll call_, the vote was: AYES: Commissioners Brown. Winter and Pistol' NAYS: Commissioners-Archer and Wenzel ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: None ABSTENTION: None . Done this 8th day of Jul. 19 80 �- BOARD 'OF COUNTY, COMMISSIONERS • COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: alkdoorai efillg ;till i.t r J• AGAN, RK• . v. y.. . / ' • • • • 0 :ti. • • • . • Y • — ...II I.%. • .,• :: . ,.' " !;lim)• 4" 1 . I 1,' .. A II '• . . -I . • k :°0:11' , 1 r 4 • i . . .. .• • . . .1„It,2 I. 1•-• a'' . 1 . • 1 .r. • t• ••„,..:....1 i ' • e•A -1 . • .. . A e:on ii coc•I ... i: ' 1" 4, . . i. 4..0 • 1 e, -.; ,..;.1,,,,, - (.1.• . 1...• . t. N', , . • 1 ...1 1 ) . .• - • 4.4 . . • • .. a., .. 1 • $ . • . - • ! of.. • , , . . . - -t•0 o •f a •r i• t - i • 1. • , 144 ' • Va tl '• , - 41,1 • . - • ,- ?..i ..:.1 - • . • 76. . . . 7- •.VI' 1 . 1 . . • . •.., • •• • !.. .t•ififi; . ... . . .. . i I ' • . .... ..`. . .-. - t 06. . 1 .0, •.. .,•:. •- •:...,•,:. ' •• •• •- ••: '' • :•• .. . ••.1 0 i rj -. • . .... . . • . • • - . .. . • • . . • I 7 '. .i.1 -."' . . . • $ • •I - . 'i\ .. * .• ' 1 -I.- ' •ill' ..• - •. i. • .41 .• . 4 • \ 1. . • ' ... . I ,i •.... • . . • I • .... • . . . . . ••• , ' :- •. • . • . • •■ ... •. •':.' . .. :.. 6 : :1 •-• .. - - • 1"'• ••-.1' .. • • ..- , • . ... - . . 1 i .• . . . ' - • I . . ii: .' . . .• • • . .. •• ... ,- - • ' . , . .. . -, • •'•.• • i • . .' . .. .7...-::• .*.' ..•- ''. • .. ., : -:1 • • ••' , I • . •I. .. . I • : • '':•. . .: • • i . • • -II (7.1. • --.--..----,..—•-••• •- --—•— --.c,•••1771.,, i ,.„_,_ i .,.. . -. . . ••-1• i -o: ‘?---1 " • -. i ' •...-.• - 1 -,•. ' - . . • . ,:g•,•• - : -..—;11 •-- , .. : - N ) :' l.:• .....•: :•-"..'- .\i.-.-• • , .. I •--„;.Nt -.-4 . . ' ,„. I ,--,i ' '•-• • • . I . C.•-•-",1 I - .. . i,• • • i • .... f ...•;..' . *.••• . , I ::z.ii 1... •••'. 1 ' . . .. '. ..I''...; .. . .. • • I -.. 1 ' • , " • • . .. :• ' i ' .4 • ... ,,:r...:i • . , I ...0. ...:,-,.„ . . • ,• •„. .:, :. , .i r•-,4 . • • - -P. •-,. : --,......,.,, . .. ...• r,..--.i. :I.:I,. - ... . . I 0( .• • •.14 .. •- . ;:,- 4.•-,) . .. ,.., c.c.,..,• . . . .. . , 1. - i• • 0:,:i •. •.• i.. .• ' - • .• .1. • , s.: • • . • .' .. _ I.' ' :-Ii-..-:''•.. 4. •.‘.4ii...t4, .''..-: ••• - .- 1 ''...?•7. ' •• 1 •• ..t . . , . . 1/4.-,,-- .- ... 'rev,- .. • .- .. ; .,::-. . :. . . '1.1. . , 1 .-0 . t• . . ' .1,•• • • 7. i.. : . to"' .- '.-- 'f,' '..c". % •- ..-- - I1J ..-.' • ent' •0 .• - - .- -11- . ...f • • ;..•.-..• . - .• - ' .•.1:,t.1, . • 1 I z 1 •? ': ; 1',;`,..4 • •• • • - .. ` .: • ..:..:--i..-.:::::'.•. .'-; -4:1.-. ...i."'f- -'f.-44 .*. . :.: ''...... ..*:!;..e , ' •. ... 4 • ; . . . ., .a9 ,r, r .i.'"::',: ,!..:.1 ,.-.:;.:.,.: !•.. 1 ki,r/ .:3..:- I ii-• ...4.:4-;. • . . .._ ' •'1.:: ' .;... • / • • ' .. .134- i"•-••• 1 2.. -• •--....1. ::.;'-it-PI ft.t;;-'•-•.••:-.-..■;-',...41•I'. •.-A1 . ; •-. .' • .'. - 1 • •-••••••:‘ .‘1.•';' 'C/..• :II; i. . •- ..-J •• •,:.-:". - t_ -(1..f;', ;:x.:i,;:t'..",';•7.•!: :,-.',:l`i • - . - : '•- ..- 1 : - •••• '-)...J--,‘",.;•.•: • . .: • ---.1, 1-::....... ..! Y-i, 141:. *i•:: ••,.. .E.':•.';' ..-...1 • . .. . . .. . .. . : 6. - . .:....,[ j:.. -•'•1,. ;14/./..• -...-:. . ;-.,i'•.• 4;-,.. -..!: ...,-.:::::•-...;,.--..-..,,% . . •. ,. „-- tr:? -- ... • .,,.-. , .. -- <.;..-,-.:-.:.:, -,if ,..-: ...).-..-:•1:.:: -7.-.7, . :.. - .. -• z-...i... ....,..:•.- .-: . •- ...-- -,,(:. _...- ..- :. ..zf-,:is, .::, .!•.:!.-2,1. -;:;/,.. . . • . , - .G"." . - '•p-;-'•--..-: --174-2:3,-t-i-1-6k-.5,u, .-',.:. ....:*'! -:.:;-. :::!: • . . 7)1,.--:-.F.2-7. ...z, •,.z,'. •; ,?•;.::. ...: -. - ,... ., . :: :4-....:;:. .::4•%i.7t - . .. . 1 . '14 - • .....'•:. . •. • * . ' .-.• t:7-7. ... C.i. . • .;;;.•;.::•.'•••:'•:6:11 . •'•• 1 . ' .. %....... ''. .. [ 7.II .. ' . --- -..-1.;' •. .. •'■,..2••• ......5.. I \... • •• - . :1...7.: :..,.'_".••,•,,,.., ...-'..- -•• I..... 76•-•.-A i t::::ifig; •:,...:. .:.•:,..!••••••••:4 . . • . • • - .51(,-. •::z...:.;.::...s:;:::-f.i..-•••_ 14: -,' - 9 A7P - ;—.--;•. :;: ' . • * • . ,-. 1•::::.7:‘., , i •- :•••-1--` ) • 4:.•- ••••1 - • :• • • • *:•1--• •," 's•''''t 4 1. - • ...., •9 :,. ,....:...y‘3` . •••■ '• -1 - . ,-----''t•I, •• • ‘•,•..... ...1 • ; . ••• 1: : . ,",;•••.`,7-;',•j;:i.1 • ••___i.„,_tnl '• '. :•• . .•••N:. • • - • •' 1 • ' • '••••.•:•,•4.:.,..:‘:;•••••::.. I 11! - •; i I . • 6 . -•"'e/ •... ...,.• •.•'' 1.....::" -- . i . . • . . •!•:"Z+-.*:"• -'••• I_1,4 . • -41•01r—).1";-":").•-• • ( -.::—.- • • " • .."- 1.••••4 • . - :• I • . • --'- ' • •. ' I.z;- ". • • • •• •• • :•• . • •.• : . • . • ' -• - . , . ..., ; ; .. ...- ...•. •-•, . :...1. . . •' i 1 . ', : '..:',•'--. : : i . 1 • . I. • . • r -• • ''. ' ,• ' •-.1 : ,. a -•.; -.. • . •. • . a • - • It—80-1.'28• • • ...........-........imr 1 _ . ......_ _______ — .......... • ATTACMENT 1 1, public water required. 2. Comply with fire codes and hydrants. i 3. Final site drainage plan shall be submitted to County engineer for review and approval. . 4. All signs .shall be approved by the Zoning Director. . 5, provisional use expires one year from date of approval unless construction has commenced. • 6. Any expansion requires site plan approval. • See R-80-128 • • • 1 r 1 RESOLUTION 94-04 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CONDITIONAL USE "2" IN THE "E" ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 2.2.3.3 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter s 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has 1 conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and i WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (ordinance No. 91-102) which includes a • Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of Conditional Use "2" of Subsection 2.2.3.3 in an "E" Estates zone for a social organization on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a natter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board 5 having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida that: fi V --1- EXHIBIT "B" FOUR PAGES Attachment C if • The petition tiled by Fred Rathgeber representing Naples Bridge Center, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: The East 150 feet of Tract 75, Unit 30, Golden Gate Estates, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 58, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use "2" of Subsection 2.2.3.3 of the "En Estates zoning district for expansion of the Naples Bridge Center in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "B") and subject to the following conditions: 1. The Current Planning Manager may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the Conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this Conditional Use application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of thin application, shall require the submittal of a new Conditional Use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102). 2. This project shall be required to meat all County ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. 3. Detailed paving, grading, site drainage, and utility plans shall be submitted to Project Plan Review for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by Project Plan Review. 4. Prior to site Development Plan approval, a letter from the Collier County Public Health Unit approving the existing septic system capacity shall be provided to Project Plan Review. • 5. All native vegetation (i.e., pines, palmettos, etc.) that fall within the interior landscape islands or can be retained for exterior or perimeter islands shall be retained. 6. No new median openings on Golden Gate Parkway shall be provided to serve this project. 7. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided by the Petitioner at the project entrance prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the expanded building. B. A minimum radius of 50 feet shall be provided at both sides of the entrance drive. Collier County Transportation Services reserves the right to require an additional westbound right turn lane if warranted by operational conditions. -2- • • i D. An additional 40 feet of depth along the entire frontage of the subject property shall be reserved for future road right-of-way purposes. No expansion of the existing drainfield shall be permitted within the 40 feet of depth. t 10. Per the Collier County Land Development code, all prohibited exotic species shall be removed from the site prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 11. The proposed draft well shall provide a minimum of 500 ;0 gallons per minute of water flow (Reference: NFPA 1231 and Collier County Ordinance No. 92-72), I 12. The Naples Bridge Center, Inc., shall not lease tha facilities which are the subject of this Conditional Use to other organizations,for a purpose different than that which is the purpose of the Naples Bridge center, Inc., in its articles of incorporation. • 13. The Naples Bridge Center, Inc., agrees to participate E in the cost of constructing an adequate potable water q distribution transmission line along Golden Gate Parkway at such time as collier County undertakes such a capital project. r BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. a Commissioner Norris offered the foregoing n Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by Commissioner 3 'aloe and upon roll call, the vote was: i AYES: Commissioner Norris,. Commissioner Volpe,. Commissioner Saunders, Commissioner Matthews and Commissioner Constantine NAYS: ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: 1 ABSTENTION: Done this 14th day of June , 1994. R BOARD O 1NING APPEALS 1H- - COLLI COUNTY, FLORIDA `., iU A / t r '' ''/ . C / i HY STANTIN$, CHAIRMAN DW�LGGHT jE I CLERK APPR¢ I' $.`,fi,, 3 FORM AND LEGAL. S�t1?'F DIENCY: �t�a.t.c I MARJORIE M. S'T'UDENT ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY 3 CU-93-13 RESOLUTION/11693 1 H il -3- i 1 I. t r. Y L. 4441...41.4... . y // V ! ! - I . • 1 • • i jjJ M ! N i N . .. g iI P. m [.a . w i 1 a 1 to a x4Ra N • f , bs ' z T • Y _ &'t1J . I i a „O Y y K i o > 1 I 4 I e ., i •., T c l Z I i I w I r i ' .k • . 'ti:•T ' • K s...;yr .. • • P120150000873 REV 1 RESOLUTION 07- 138 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE WHICH ALLOWS A SOCIAL CLUB IN THE ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.04.03, TABLE 2, OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER, LOCATED AT 5865 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public;and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses;and WHEREAS,by Resolution No. 80-128,a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A,"the Board of County Commissioners approved a Provisional Use for the establishment of the Naples Bridge Club pursuant to Section 14-1D of the then-current Zoning Regulations, subject to a number of conditions;and WHEREAS,by Resolution No. 94-424,a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B," the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County approved a Conditional Use for the expansion of the Naples Bridge Center in accordance with a conceptual master plan, subject to a number of conditions;and WHEREAS, the Naples Bridge Center, Inc., has filed Petition No. CU-2006-AR- 11034,requesting an expansion to the existing conditional use to allow a building addition of 3,500 square feet and 50 additional parking spaces;and WHEREAS,the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected,has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided,and has considered the advisability of allowing this requested expansion of the existing Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.04.03,Table 2 of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates zoning district on the property hereinafter described, and the Collier County Planning Commission has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "C") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 10.08.00.D.of the Land Development Code;and Page 1 of 2 Attachment D WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County,Florida,that: Petition CU-220-AR-11034, filed by Joss Nageon de Lastang, P.E. of GuIfshore Engineering, Inc.,representing the Naples Bridge Center, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit"D,"is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.04.03, Table 2 of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates Zoning District,for a social club in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit"E,"subject to the previously required conditions set forth in Resolution No,80- 128 and Resolution No. 94-424, copies of which are attached hereto, together with the conditions set forth in Exhibit"F"attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution hereby supersedes and replaces both Resolution No. 80-128 and.Resolution No. 94-424, excepting the conditions set forth therein,which are incorporated by reference into this Resolution,and that the remainder of Resolution No.80-128 and Resolution No.94-424 are accordingly repealed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion,second and super-majority vote,this 0.2?—day of 2007, ATTEST: DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA mast as i IN1 RtMMly lerk /lir ES , .rrman Att signature oni■ Ap ov:.'as t• to an. V '`' AAA Jeffr•T A.Kla r ...w Man y•g Assis t County Attorney Page 2 of 2 i .. - • ... . - • - 1 .., f itc.1 i z 2 •,3 g 1 -----k;V . 1 ?.. 1 RESIDENTIAL " 1> i LINE Is, IESTATES-E-ZONING) ,,,,,,, 11 I 11! 4 .,-I 3 • ... t . r‘. . . . . . . . . . • . _....._,± , ' • • 3 . i f 0 4./ ! r ••••••• .....%•• • • •' .71"REAR • NATnIE • • ).•• l 1 •I. pulp • VEGETATION.•.,,,,Th• .• , .2,, ,sereAc(. fm.sEi!vE. . .i . . . re CC Z - 1 k . i 311 1 LW ILI ti ..1. Ern" ••••••••• •••.',' " d 8 1 ; 1 ,0, 0 fril s i I— ' ,1 . 2 E .:4.g. 'Z1=; 1-Z Z *--T,: ' .:‘7 . .. i- uj i " 1 -Fl P 1 1 K i i 5 1 . Z 0.i LIU 1,..1 , e g Li t.„-::247k4Mibx,,, i‘iiz' -'....•:-.:..1•I: 27 ill li a 0 (..) _i 1._ 111 ei.!:.' .....-.•I.....,'.','Q_1',::!::.:*:.:-‘.;:". .. ki'''■ r- ''!:-II 1 tj• `'')Li I.S.il§.,I i t.. 'I i I i .D_O 2, 1 1 i i Eui ut 0 0 Cf. e, i .T. 3ETBACK is..1i '.. . "OF:f4R10 G..."1., -'.. .... ) , < 0 1 z Z 0 i i!:. .-. - - • .-. --- , \ .. . / g '4. UNIT II OF EXISTING II-, '.' '--.,•.f- 41'. fi,„,.. .e .. A VEGETATION r• :••••if '‘.. 4. :aii-,.--....- - • ., 4.14 . g tile4 gE Lill iii t RESIDENTIAL I. -:. • .-....... tillhh.LASTS or 4 ti'',L:r1 ri" 51 ' (ESTATES-E-ZONING) r2_ : .......; timp...- - ,,. :,. emeTING v rl•-.!-Jr $ ;,..; ,:•-•-,,e-•-.-• -"- - ".,i.....c. - I.'.:.-\ 1 Cl!7-..r . .. i '1 i: V"::.":"7;'•P.J...i."7.fa?..:;6?..::•:•.:.. .,..•-tf, SETBACK 'Q 0:.• I '_ W r pi i prtorERry ! • : : - • .+_ ,r7-:-...•-. ..... .,..:.- • 5'..:... 1 r I. ,..,.,,,,..j.j.:,:-::.:„ 'ii.ii.:!. rill iii 1 , RESIDENTIAL g ; II k I-1 1 --::: ...-: ,': sag S.:.V..sq., IESTATES-E-ZONING] " ill i Ng•••:-?..--5211 .. ,-i..- & !i; Vall.,7-,.. ; „..-1 r- 0 ... : :1 1.11 1 cn.''''":";..:. -• ...:-.:.:)-: NCLCEDFRONT r Z 4 g •; . ' CO -: i''''ll''':.••5• :' '.II...--...p:".-'I.•...771''''. pRopeiere a R A 1 4 ''. ...... .1..- - '''''..-,-''.:. •' '••••-I•iiI-F:.-,.-......., zl, •—"..UWE I 1 I RI '. . . ; Lu 651K 1• .4, XLOADING Eft TRASH i,,, .,....,.-_,:,........ .. .:,...,. ....... aii,.., Plii 11 if; ILI L.L1 DUMPSTER t.,,,,z's../...: ;4,...f(.;:::::...... ..i,..74 2 4 A 1 i MI. .*:.. " Li- .i!....,N-- ' if rr6.1 -; II !II !Li ii.a -ff.,. ...'.••',: '''': i 7 I i 1" 15' fl■••'•....b.MI ', ,... .P:.° :..t i I SETBACK cr..?."....... •0-... .-,":-.• • iy 11 A;fi 11 ., ..-. 1. h.:-;.;::.ft;',k‘ 1 ILI =1 WEST LINE-TRACT /e .•,...,,, .4. 'P. . ..,i ,:i;;I:i4).A. _ ,,.,_.4 A■-• i 75 GOLDEN GATE 4';:,z; i ,:z. .."--,::•::-•• 1 rYPS-8. g ESTATES,mar 30. PR.11-114 ••• 4, FFES ,.....V,..?..lkiii• 1 V.:S.549,1: 1 Aqverisielk4' ::-'-,;.4.- 3500 SF'.!:..1 titt:' ' + t111:7>:-V. .: ii 1 •.):'.7/!%/.,:' 1 .0.'•.'.' Ci. 1.. s Is rtr*g... 4ar 1 a4st'A• a - 1- is _ i-,-.. ." I ts• c,7 W .:' 1. 2:;;:...1:••••.:: 3 seTSACK 6 z g SETBACK tt 1..`C 't• -1 - t .5 t•••••''..1P.'3'.1 0 5 a• a. -1:-,..,.....- -0-- .1 Ls o- is • till i''',' ; i ' WI 1.-. 0 GI 0 IU 'lior ."! .t.'...1 1,.• • II! is TYPE"W. III is fc V) IV BUFFER 0 . t'oAr.PsPtRioOm X.O P-- -- -- .-___ ...:.-._ AI.lT __oiis_Oc,A,, 1HE SWALE oFKNPELE 0 if.-.,lI 11-l i.'II•'I•;t r: ill:: it c. I I I ! I F.IPM g FS Type-ii" ..1 w w gir aurpf,,, • , s. I ,--L.- - ........ ............... , fa,... -. , 1 0,... MONO GNACIE ON it, . „..... . . 1.,.c . __ _ _ _04 _ 131.-GUTO 1 :8 1-- 1 ! l ------ , 1 t ffr .„... .__ i - _ 11 GOLDEN GATE PKWY I 1 111114 I 1 1 0 1 il lilt I ; I,. ... . . . _.. 1 .....--- —. , CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOR CU-2006-AR-11034 1. The Naples Bridge Center shall not lease the facilities which are the subject of this Conditional Use. 2. The applicant shall incorporate the outdoor lighting standards outlined in Golden Gate Area Master Plan Policy 5.1.1 into the site plan during the SDP review process. 3. The applicant shall locate the dumpster a minimum of 40 feet away from any adjacent residential property line. EXHIBIT "F" G: Current/Gundlach/Conditional Uses/ Naples Bridge Center/Exhibit"F"Conditions 4-23-07 FINDINGS OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2006-AR-11034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorizes the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: i A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: : Yes /No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular _ . ._ _-. . reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control,and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress&egress Yes / No r C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare,economic or odor i effects: {/o affect or Affect mitigated by<text> Affect cannot be mitigated r D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district i Yes 1/ No Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,with stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. DATE: (61/° ( CHAIRMAN: _ - _. '111/ EXHIBIT "C • • • FINDING OF FACT BY . COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION • - FOR • CU-2006-AR-11034 The following facts are found: Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2, Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes t'No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow . - and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress &egress • • Yes f• No - . C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare,economic or odor effects: te.No affect:or Affect mitigated by • Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: • Compatible use within district Yes 4../No Based on.the above findings,this conditional use should,with stipulations,(copy attached) - (should not)be recommended for approval. / y • DATE: 4 /i rf ;a '7 MEMBER. Jui-, �---�_ •EXHIBIT "C" • • • FINDING OF FACT • BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMIVUSSION, FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION • • FOR • CfJ-2006-AR-11034 • The following facts are found: • 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional uSe. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: • • A. Consistency with the Land Dev ibpment Code and Growth Management Plan:. Yes . No • B. • Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow . and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: • Adequate ingress&egress • Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: - • • No affect or • Affect mitigated b g by Affect cannot be mitigated • • • D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district • Yes / No Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,with stipulations, copy attached) • (should not)be recommended for approval. �J DATE: �� MEMBER .._ • A A z 1a?-� EXHIBIT "C" • FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2006-AR-I 1034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use, 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress& egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: yNo affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district YeX No Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,with stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. DATE: `7"' /`1— °7 MEMBE �.�5 c EXHIBIT °C" I i . t .. i i FINDING OF FACT . i BY i ' COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR i A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR if CU-2006-AR-11034 i The following facts are found: i 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: 1 1 A. Consistency with the Land velopment Code and Growth Management Plan: 1 Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow i and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: i / Adequate ingress& egress Yes No C. Affect neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare,economic or odor effect No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: 1 Compatible use within distri = Yes No Based on the above findings,this conditional use should, 'th stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. DATE: Ill d MEMBER: OA- EXHIBIT "C" FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2006-AR-11034 The following facts are found: I. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2, Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land De opment Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress&egress Yes No C. Affects ne' boring properties in relation to noise, glare,economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,with stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. DATE: q- r ?l 0 7 MEMBER: • EXHIBIT "C" FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR i CU-2006-AR-11034 The following facts are found: 1. . Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: I / Yes V No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular r reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control,and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress&egress Yes V No 1 1 C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare, economic or odor eff No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within di ' t Yes No 1 Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,wi I stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. DATE: Ali ii MEMBER: EXHIBIT "C" . r R FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2006-AR-I 1034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes ✓ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress&egress Yes a/ No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare,economic or odor effects: I No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes ✓ No Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,with stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. DATE: "1• /9-D 7 MEMBER: Zest, iZ • EXHIBIT "C` ..Y x • FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU-2006-AR-11034 The following facts are found: 1. Section 10.08.00 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management PIan: Yes V No !t B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control,and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress&egress Yes i/ No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare, economic or odor effects: V No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Y Yes No Based on the above findings,this conditional use should,with stipulations,(copy attached) (should not)be recommended for approval. DATE: 41// q I MEMBER: Al t'I,f_-C✓L 4 EXHIBIT "C" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • • • • PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (❑.R 1574, PG. 943) THE EAST-150 FEET OF TRACT 75,.GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 30, ACCORDING Tq PLAT IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 58, .PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONTAINING 2,04 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, _ SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD, • • • EXHIBIT "D" • ak 1 T i 1 2 TRANSCRIPT OF THE 3 NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER 4 CONDITIONAL USE AND GMPA 5 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 6 December 14, 2015 7 5:30 p.m. 8 9 10 11 Appearances: 12 WAYNE ARNOLD 13 ED KANT 14 SUE FAULKNER 15 NANCY GUNDLACH 16 SHARON UMPENHOUR 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Attachment E 2 1 MR. ARNOLD: All right. Good evening, 2 everybody. I'm Wayne Arnold of GradyMinor, and ! 3 this is Sharon Umpenhour from our office. She'll 4 be recording the neighborhood meeting. 5 It looks like most of the folks here are 6 either staff or the Bridge Center. I know we have 7 Russell Tuff (phonetic) from the Golden Gate Civic 8 Association tonight, and then a neighbor, Vlad 9 (phonetic) , I think is your name. So we have two 10 members of the public that I'll try to address what 11 we're going through in the process and then open it • 12 up for some questions and probably exchange 13 (indiscernible) . • 14 Do you think my voice is okay? 15 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah 16 (indiscernible) . 17 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. The process we're going 18 through is a two-step process. We're actually 19 amending the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow a 20 conditional use to be approved on the eastern-most 21 parcel that we have here. The Bridge Center bought 22 that property and is seeking to expand the 23 facilities on the existing tract that we're sitting 24 in, but we would limit then, through the 25 conditional use, improvements on this part of the • • 3 1 property to parking. 2 This is kind of the concept plan we're working 3 from, showing an expansion of the Bridge Center 4 that would be authorized through the conditional 5 use and the plan amendment language, limiting 6 ourselves to a maximum of 15,000 total square feet. 7 It's a little bit bigger than the proposed 8 expansion that they're looking at, but really 9 wanting to make sure that if they need to make 10 minor incremental changes in the future, that they 11 don't have to come back through this process every 12 time. 13 And then this is the property that's to the 14 east that we're adding as part of the conditional 15 use in the plan amendment, and we've limited 16 ourselves to preserve open space and parking uses 17 on that site. None of the physical building • 18 improvements supporting the Bridge Center would be 19 located there. 20 And also made a provision for a small 21 maintenance building to be built in the future, 22 just to allow the Bridge Center to maintain its 23 property. 24 So the process we're in, we've had one 25 sufficiency round of comments from the county 4 1 1 staff. They've asked for some technical things 2 related to the comprehensive plan. Zoning, I don't 3 think we have any significant issues of any kind, 4 but for our neighbor, we're calling that a minimum 5 30-foot wide vegetative buffer along our eastern 6 boundary adjacent to you. 7 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Is it set in stone? 8 Is it fixed, like, you know, you aren't going to 9 change it to, say, 20 or 50 in the future? 10 MR. KANT: No. I can sit here and represent 11 that I told you 30. It's going to be at least 30. 12 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. 13 MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, and we don't have the 14 details of that. We just simply called it, for 15 this purpose, as a vegetative buffer, but if 16 there's additional dialogue between you and 17 Mr. Kant or any of the Bridge members, you know, 18 certainly let us know if there's details there that 19 you need. 20 But that process that we're going through, 21 again, that's a comp -- small scale plan amendment 22 and a conditional use. We don't have any hearing 23 dates established. We kind of went through those 24 loosely with the comprehensive planning staff 25 today, and we would hope to get through this 5 1 process maybe April or May time frame in the 2 spring, but, of course, like any of you who have 3 seen them, we'll post zoning signs. You're within 0 4 the noticed radius where you will get a letter 5 indicating that there's an upcoming public hearing. 6 And then with the Civic Association, I know 7 that the -- some of the Bridge representatives have 8 met with your group and I think we had a pretty 9 positive outcome, but if we need to come and make a s` 10 presentation to your group at some point, you know, 11 if you'd let us know, we'd be happy to come back 12 and do that once some of these details are flushed 13 out. 14 That's really kind of what we're doing. 15 I think I forgot to introduce Nancy Gundlach. 16 MS. GUNCLACH: Hi. 17 MR. ARNOLD: She's the planner handling the 18 conditional use application. 19 And then we have Sue Faulkner, who is here 20 from comprehensive planning handling the small 21 scale amendment. r � 22 And for the amendment to the comp plan, 23 there's -- just so everybody is aware, there was a 24 prohibition on more conditional uses and commercial 25 development on the Parkway. So we're amending that ' II } 6 1 section to allow this to be an exempted site. 2 It was different than, Vlad, you may remember 3 like the David Lawrence Center, they kind of 4 created their own district and road standards. 5 We're looking to really create our standards 6 through the conditional use process, so just a 7 little different, but the same result at the end of 8 the day. It allows us to expand on the existing 9 property and then put our parking, water 10 management, open space on the other parcel. 11 It's really -- I think that's it, in a 12 nutshell. I mean, I'm happy to answer any 13 uestions that q you may have. I know members of the 14 board, you may not have been as plugged in as Ed 15 has been, but happy to field any questions from 16 anybody, or if you have questions of staff. 17 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Will the rear of 18 the -- will the rear of the property be taken -- 19 the vegetation taken off to create the swale? 20 MR. ARNOLD: Some of it will. We're proposing 21 to -- the county has a native vegetation retention 22 requirement. And they told us that we need about 23 .4 acres, so a little under half an acre. This 24 plan represents about half an hour of native 25 vegetation preservation, and we're keeping most of 7 1 that along the back side, but behind what's been 2 previously cleared. 3 And then we're not calling preserve adjacent 4 on this so we can treat it as a landscape buffer. 5 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I see. 6 MR. KANT: However, if I might interject, one 1 7 of the things that we want to try to do is to keep 8 as much of this native as possible the way it is, 9 maybe get rid of some of the wild stuff, the 10 peppers and that type of thing, but, frankly, it's 11 to our advantage to do that because it's just that • 12 much less we're going to have to spend on 13 re-vegetating, you know, to get that landscape 14 buffer. 15 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. 16 MR. KANT: So we want to try to keep as much 17 of what's in there natural as we can. 18 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Was that expected • 19 to be water retention, then? 20 MR. ARNOLD: Well, the area back here, we're 21 calling that as probable water management area. We 22 can use parts of landscape buffers for water 23 management, but Mike Dowlett (phonetic) , one of our • 24 engineers, is actually working on the site 25 development plan and looking at how we're going to 8 1 treat that 30 feet, and I don't think we have to 2 rely on it for water management. Maybe some 3 conveyance from collecting some of it to bring it 4 back here, but not much of it. 5 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay. 6 MR. ARNOLD: If any. We're not quite there 7 yet. 8 MR. KANT: Yeah, probably, I would think -- 9 well Thur -- again, I don't know that it's germane 10 to this meeting, but we have a meeting, preliminary 11 pre-app set up for Thursday afternoon with the 12 county to talk about the site development plan, and 13 at that point, we hope to get a little bit better 14 handle on, you know, how much are they going to 15 look for water management, you know, what type of 16 water management features. 17 But our biggest change from a water management 18 point of view is the parking area. And that may 19 drive what type of surface we use. It might drive 20 what type of islanding, curbing and things like 21 that, or lack thereof, that we need to do. 22 So, you know, that's really down the road at 23 this point. 24 MR. ARNOLD: Anything else? (Indiscernible) ? 25 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. I'll just add 9 1 that I would like to, you know, have that 30-foot 2 wide vegetative buffer the way it is. 3 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. 4 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Because I do have a 5 pool there. I would like to keep privacy -- 6 MR. ARNOLD: Uh-huh. Sure. 3 i 7 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: -- on that side of 8 the piece of property. 9 MR. ARNOLD: Right. Understood. E 10 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So, yeah, I mean I s 11 would appreciate if you just kept it the way it is. 12 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. To the extent we can. I 13 mean, if there's Brazilian pepper (indiscernible) 14 going to have to come off. 15 MR. KANT: Yeah, if there's Brazilian pepper 16 (indiscernible) going to be removed. Yeah, we have 17 to. ! 18 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, take that out, yl 19 yeah, yeah, yeah. I 20 MR. KANT: And then if we have to, we only 0 21 wind up (indiscernible) . 0 22 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I (indiscernible) 23 taken out when I -- because its -- I have 24 breakouts and it's just -- that stuff is very 25 annoying. • 10 1 1 MR. ARNOLD: Hey, Norm. 2 MR. KANT: I want to make sure that it's clear 1 3 in this public meeting, it's not a public hearing, 4 but this public meeting, that we have represented 5 to Mr. Amuloff (phonetic) that that would be a 6 30-foot vegetative buffer. And we have no 7 intention of changing that. 8 I can't say that it's going to be 30.00 -- 30 3 9 feet, point zero zero inches. It might be, you 10 know, 30 feet and one inch, it might be 29 feet, 11 11 and three-quarters inches, but it's q going to be 30 12 feet, especially (indiscernible) . And, 13 unfortunately, it is so thick in there, until we 14 start doing some clearing, I'm not sure what we're 15 going to find, so. 16 What I wanted to protect against is us having 17 to spend money to plant where there's already good 18 plantings. That's what I wanted to protect 19 against. 20 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Well, it sounds 21 like you like it the way it is now, anyway, so if a j i 22 minimal amount has to come out because it's 23 foreign, that's what we take out. 24 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. 25 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. 11 1 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And this is your, 2 like, maximum footprint of that parking lot, right? 3 So you may actually decide to build something 4 smaller (indiscernible) . 5 MR. KANT: That's correct. Yeah -- 6 MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, we're in the design stages 7 right now, trying to -- between working with the 8 architect, who the Bridge Center has retained, and 9 trying to do the site design. Like Ed said, once 10 we go to our pre-application meeting with the 11 county staff, we'll be able to go back and refine 12 that. 13 I mean, I can't tell you that we're not going 14 to make some of the -- this is going to be maybe a 15 redesign area, and to make up some of the parking 16 that we may lose here, we may end up putting 17 another tier of parking back here or something, 18 but -- 19 MR. KANT: Yeah, I just -- I want to make it 20 clear that what we're showing here is both what's 21 here now and what we anticipated when this was done 22 in -- in March -- no, in September, three months 23 ago. 24 We may -- we may be able to narrow those down 25 a bit. We want to, because I know we're talking III w III 12 1 about changing the traffic flow so that we get more 2 of a one-way type of flow through here. When we do 3 that, we may not need all of this much island, in 4 which case we might be able to pull that in a 5 little bit, but I don't want to make that promise 6 to you now. I just don't know. 7 What I will make the representation to you now 8 is that's 30 feet. 9 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. 10 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. 11 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Sounds good. 12 MR. ARNOLD: All right. Anything else 13 (indiscernible) ? 14 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, just as the 15 Golden Gate Civic Association, we had voted to -- 16 in favor of the concept, and they were good 17 neighbors, and we've appreciated what they've done 18 in making it good, and so we were favorable, and 19 that was, unless there was some objections from 20 residential, but we like the idea. 21 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. Good. 22 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thought it was a 23 good use of (indiscernible) . 24 MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. I think that we've had 25 that dialogue with the county. It makes so much 13 1 sense, with the infrastructure that' s in place, to 2 build on what's here, and they've been good 3 neighbors for 30 plus years, so that's why we're 4 all pursuing this avenue. 5 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Unless 6 (indiscernible) but I didn't bring the letter and I 7 did look for it quick, but I think we wrote a 8 letter in support (indiscernible) . 9 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes. Yes, we did. 1 10 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. 11 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) more 12 detail than that if we need it. 13 MR. ARNOLD: Anything else? Vlad, Russell? 14 Okay. Anybody else? 15 Meeting adjourned. 16 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thank you. #: 17 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I also move 18 (indiscernible) , 19 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thank you. 20 MR. ARNOLD: Good timing, huh? 21 (Recording concluded. ) 22 23 24 25 14 1 STATE OF FLORIDA 2 COUNTY OF COLLIER 3 4 I, Joyce B. Howell, do hereby certify that: 5 1. The foregoing pages numbered 1 through 13 6 contain a full, true and correct transcript of 7 proceedings in the above-entitled matter, transcribed 8 by me to the best of my knowledge and ability from a 9 digital audio recording. 10 2. I am not counsel for, related to, or 11 employed by any of the parties in the above-entitled 12 cause. 13 3 . I am not financially or otherwise 14 interested in the outcome of this case. 15 16 SIGNED AND CERTIFIED: 17 18 Date: December 21, 2015 Joyce B. Howell 19 20 21 22 23 24 • 25 • AGENDA ITEM 9-C Co er Count _ _r y STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 17, 2016 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20150001084 BUCKLEY MPUD PROPERTY OWNER& APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner: Agents: Airport Pulling Orange Blossom, Alexis Crepso,AICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. LLC Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Coleman, Yovanovich, & Koester, P.A. 560 Delaware Ave., Room 400 28100 Bonita Grande Dr., Northern Trust Bank Bldg Buffalo,NY 14202 Suite 305 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Bonita Springs,FL 34135 Naples,FL 34103 Applicant/Contract Purchaser: Pulte Home Corporation 24311 Walden Center Dr. Bonita Springs, FL 34134 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an application to amend Ordinance Number 14-24,the Buckley Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), to add single-family detached dwellings and two-family, duplex dwellings as permitted uses in the residential component of the MPUD,to add a master plan for residential development as an alternative to a mixed use or all commercial development, to add deviations to allow more signage, and to allow dead-end streets. PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 1 of 19 March 8, 2016 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Airport-Pulling Road (CR 31) and Orange Blossom Drive in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,Florida. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Generally,the petitioner is requesting to amend the MPUD to allow single-family detached and two- family/duplex dwellings. The significant changes to the PUD Document include new development standards and an alternate Master Plan (applicable to the new residential uses), an amendment to one(1)of the existing deviations that was previously approved,and six(6)new deviations from the Land Development Code (LDC). Other changes can be found in the proposed ordinance (see Attachment#1—Proposed Ordinance). It should be noted the proposed PUD Document contains a proviso in Exhibit F (Developer Commitment)that once residential or commercial development commences,the Master Plan option which was not pursued would become void. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the Staff Report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the subject site. North: Adult Congregate Living Facility/Adult Living Facility/Skilled Nursing facility (HarborChase of Naples), zoned Planned Unit Development(PUD). East: Right-of-way for Airport-Pulling Road; then farther east is a canal; still farther east is developed residential (Lakeside of Naples), zoned PUD and a church (St. Katherine's Greek Orthodox Church), zoned Rural Agricultural(A)with a Conditional Use(CU). South: Collier County Library Headquarters, zoned A with a CU. West: Single-family residential (Emerald Lakes), zoned PUD at a density of 3.54 dwelling units per acre. (See location map on the following page) PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 2 of 19 March 8,2016 e m + sill 4 II S IiS „1 -° BEN TAMIAMI TRAIL (U.S.41) 4K ri z TAMIAMI TRAIL -92 10 5.3 $ z lei Oy-at Ill m 5 la II 4 GOODLETTE-FRANK ROAD (CR.851) 1.. 4Nl u hlm r / X 81 O vN+m N N YOORWGS PARK ��_GOODLETTE-FRANK / _&m In 0 ROAD (CR 851) °F t � yy RU 300 ACR OOODIETIE ROAD PUO u�I� Y" !! L2 MIAMI p5 o _ g i ir ii Ar, N �l C) €L U = ° m1 I n- "� 51 login) it go`?" AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD 2 O ROAD CARILLON ff$ S --`\I > g (C.R 31) ,..Q 111 ■ R.31) ggi M 4 D Z S i $ t / AjS m 11 1F ro I a yp "� i 4 �E ° n1 �' A PENCAN YAR91 tv 11 yy g ■ QQ a N KI ° � " r 6 MOB 801808IM (GR) r _� LIVINGSTON ROAD _u m■! O 11 D I-n V A 4 ,` II • i� w m VI° I m n m ii g m z —1-,-- a @ I- a INTERSTATE-75 1 U C p b'^5 °5 F c i' ----, ,, °� d k ESS ROODS ig ., GF COUNTRY B MTERSTATE-15 m HUNPNCTCN —1 4 o d ° °" z v c ❑ NOT TO SCALE D B s %:z8=: !0io , .cn _ a- rn� �o ic �.s� 5 sv A It o l'tl II N : 8 D 1 mom © �� _ 0 8 �� 0 ° � 1 m i z 8D yrorenBB z 30 Z P I n 4 C C U J > e c � v O is g m (C.R. 31) AIRPORT—PULLING ROAD _ CANAL • 8 V �0 112 '' ! Ti \ s°a g C a 2 0 s2 0 0 h O Z m 7 -n. $ LONE OAR BLVD. ® umiiM 0 m a8 0a a g u 1 4 it�J�'is�, ' S ter j '`. s-1. ?� , ` AN.9Y t rt ..� .6.'�. M, Excp ill x ry' '1 SH Bay .7t, - .Zonmg:4 tS re-I C TT SV,ORI+ t '- :,P,ELICAN 'r "st ,,. ,Laurel OR ° � z y � PUD' $ 3n aliDe I l :---. . ,MARSH a '�w rti/M3tVentur�alWAaiY i coItWAYgt; r j d �' *"04.-1.6"66611.1 rRk. 1 a i ��VAa,�d a Bea'hoR D��r e a bd K t.,s^ -y - .-M J1 WALrGREENS + VINEYARDS' o• \Illesdo*talline1 Gardner •D { 2 ,+ ,,,,,,,C.ga:. d 'L4,,rMARKER Z ,- . , , 1a Gates c N- "t;t3D M'`'P �W.LAKE `=Q .+...� • ?: r . cy .... .IP s$ 6IGhr 1-1A Rl F-rN .' ''4st' ''"`•• j 3 = - C `'TrVILLA74 4Z J ZO91ny:} _ i,�� lii x...:t `t " v 5 J' 4 -� -r a��Zonis mfiR �. A! to t�4 y, onrng w � , 4" PUD" ,. z t <Q,A. ��Jy r, ,• R t ?. PUD:', Subject Property ( j1M'a y n o ,i, t 7°411"i 0, �.c, ",M� � vs,"! -.,_ ._,Esmeraie,d ..,. , -. ��'�- a a1d R ;t. 4 t 1�• ,:* O•i*^ WAY- „....,L0 Id Qc i',, ei, c srA,s.k; ff.'s r .w'3,- MONTEREY1 ay, m ` ake DR G :c os s' v# ��. 6zo,tla 4o . ✓0 1 , -�4 F r\b zonr„g 6 t'' iE�{I .m'c $ F,75:* e oti .:iD 4%4 - aAP `, 111/ �a N i'PUD I W-.0 .wi k. .? to s ' A I r ri !4 {.T z 1,r 4% i 7 o f. ea 4reMr . 3 ,, •e r d z .a 'J aq a k p wii.ji�it∎PL.Ira;-sH Fs.♦ . ,' { t $ ^Y •R--J w `S9 h s a^r a`ii X. Z zO ' °' , '...gl p A f t t r ,5. Mures ,oa,��'1'OA`K ,;r 4. e,r;r .. men ,*`t0 3 j ._s 'AV i s- WAY, YStGROVE .. . aiWPf -^.E G\8 j�` ' • ~' ;- � 4`'a+ °rsY+., �' y, °' t : . F.i '.*+Y .'ice zi n ng', , ia ^ ' A '.z as ” r p do, EMERALD MP%rD r \,",,,,,,4,15,..""111,-- C TRUS t,) ,-pqd"n..e:t fat . •�. LAKES Zonarg J it 4tw'�t 4rtrus 9 GARDFNS + tp...+ iM ^0,,zti ` yw Lake DR PiiD , ' „y_ '�a t 8 elty r l l a ais '�, Ito' �w,� Pll Ito �1�11111 i° g ( s.4 W AJY,,.y u1 U 3�:. r wit oaf Nld tfd0euna 6 .grY�WAY,,,...� � s e +1Rih t _ r 'r {A • 4 to t413iM+ '"t6e 4 a�; J'_ a.c\mberirne.0 a „„1-t, 1w ►� SIENA fie 4V1-4'1° 'A f ttfl ' �- ME Zonr LAKES ' -161‘.. f ' 4 O1 R 1' Zoning( r te' ,,r y ..,,tQ0 , ,.. .tea' C— - ., CPUO; 'iior1zo°wn0 d. ,,, 1 � • .rr�:w7 M r` . m ,Zoning' 5. Y 8--9 a t�S+a K � CARLISLE�q+, 1112'......„it,,tv u0 LONE{OAK �/��oni i� tt#� ov.0 ` *- r REGENCYa t ,.PLDD z a 4. . n e.0 a`'x� ° ': f ,LI?UO I Il It w w �._ at 4413 - x,;.Y:T.r I* .y 'Zoriiii ti.,...PU0 "r „p tt,,coo,, Z U 1 �"r�� F C I;5-1,'")--. FICHURCH OE' SLEEPtY 362SF4<A< . •4°1 S �,,,1 '" \ ad6 i.of'4 NAPLESy�i � f1� 6HOLLOW��;�'!1�t�` .` _"" • � ems' a�.ir:Yll! i ✓ Aerial(County GIS) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN(GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element(FLUE): The subject site is designated Urban,Urban Mixed Use District,Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict,on the Future Land Use Map of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). In the Future Land Use Element(FLUE)of the GMP,this Subdistrict reads,"The intent of this Subdistrict,which comprises 21.7 acres, is to allow for limited retail,office and residential uses while allowing for the development of a mixed-use development. The Activity Centers to the north and south provide for large-scale commercial uses, while this Subdistrict is intended to promote convenience and intermediate commercial development to serve existing and future residential development in the immediate area. This Subdistrict will serve to reduce existing trip lengths for convenience and intermediate commercial services. Commercial uses for the purpose of this section are limited to those permitted and conditional uses allowed in the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts except as noted below. The development of this Subdistrict will be governed by the following criteria." (The i PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 3 of 19 March 8, 2016 complete criteria and analysis has been provided in Attachment #2 — Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review). Consistency Determination: Comprehensive Planning staff finds this petition to be consistent with the Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict and with the FLUE (see Attachment #2 - Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review). Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2014 and 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports(AUIR). Policy 5.1 "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the FLUE affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2%of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2%of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways." The proposed PUD Amendment to allow a single-family development on the subject property will generate approximately 230 PM peak hour, net trips on the adjacent roadway links, as follows: Airport Pulling Road from Vanderbilt Beach Road to Orange Blossom Drive, a six-lane divided facility,with a current service volume of 3,000 and a remaining capacity of approximately 841 trips, and currently operating at LOS "C". This PUD was previously approved to allow commercial and multi-family residential uses that generated approximately 687 PM peak hour net trips on the same adjacent roadway link. Based on the reduced number of trips proposed and the current 2015 AUIR capacity noted, the above roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the project PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 4 of 19 March 8,2016 within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). No native vegetation occurs on site. The subject property was historically used for row crops and later on as a plant nursery. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. ANALYSIS: Applications for amendments to, or rezoning to, PUD shall be in the form of a PUD master plan of development along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The PUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support its action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD Document to address environmental concerns. This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Landscape Review: Staff has reviewed the PUD Document and Master Plan and has no issues with the requested changes. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition request, the PUD Document,and the Master Plan for compliance with Collier County Access Management Resolution Number 13-257; and as noted above, for consistency with the transportation elements of the GMP. Transportation Planning staff is recommending approval of the request. Utilities Review: Approved. No comment. PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 5 of 19 March 8,2016 Zoning Services Review: When evaluating this proposed amendment,staff analyzed the 1)proposed uses; and 2)associated development standards. The analysis is as follows: Proposed Uses - In determining whether the proposed uses will be compatible with, and complimentary to, surrounding land uses, Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff (as summarized in the Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review — see Attachment#2). In evaluating compatibility of the proposed uses to the surrounding uses, it should be noted that the abutting development to the west (Emerald Lakes at Bridget Lake Unit PUD) contains existing single-family homes at a density of 3.54 dwelling units per acre. The Buckley MPUD was previously approved with more dense and intense land uses (at a maximum density of 11 dwelling units per acre); therefore, the introduction of single-family and two-family/duplex residential land uses to the MPUD is perceived to be compatible and complimentary to the surrounding land uses. A preliminary plat application has recently been submitted to the County, proposing 82 home sites(3.78 dwelling units per acre). Development Standards- Staff compared the development standards of the proposed uses with that of the single-family zero lot line homes in Emerald Lakes at Bridget Lake Unit as well as with the cluster housing provisions found in the LDC. Table 1 on the following page shows the development standards for the new single-family and two- family duplex uses associated with this request(82 units shown on the PPL) and how they compare with the standards for the single-family zero lot line homes in Emerald Lakes at Bridget Lake Unit as well as with the cluster housing provisions found in the LDC: (See table on following page) PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 6 of 19 March 8,2016 Table 1. Development Standards Comparison Buckley MPUD Buckley MPUD Emerald Lakes Cluster Housing Single-family Two- Single-family LDC Detached family/Duplex Zero Lot Line Minimum Lot 5,400 s.f. 3,500 s.f. 5,500 s.f. 3,000 s.f. Area Minimum Lot 45 feet 35 feet 50 feet(except 40 feet Width cul-de-sacs) 20 feet(cul-de- sac) Minimum Floor 1,200 s.f. 750 s.f. 750 feet N/A Area Front Setback 20 feet 1,3'4 20 feet 1'3'4 25 feet 20 feet 10 feet(side entry garage) Side Setback 5 feet 5 feet 0 feet or 10 feet ZLL on 10 feet one side No ZLL 5 feet Rear Setback 10 feet 2'5 10 feet 2'5 25 feet 6 10 feet (Principal) Rear Setback 5 feet 2'5 5 feet 2'5 10 feet 3 feet (Accessory) PUD Perimeter 30 feet 30 feet N/A N/A Setback(east) PUD Perimeter 20 feet 20 feet N/A N/A Setback(north and south) PUD Perimeter 25 feet 25 feet N/A N/A Setback(west) Minimum Distance between Structures (principal 10 feet 0 or 10 feet 0 feet or 10 feet N/A accessory) 10 feet 0 or 10 feet Per LDC N/A Maximum Height 35 feet 35 feet 30 feet N/A (zoned) Maximum Height 40 feet 40 feet PUD predated Per underlying (actual) _ LDC definition zoning district 1. Garages and carports shall be 10 feet from principal structures if detached. There will be a minimum of a 23 foot setback from the back of a sidewalk to front load garages. For corner lots, only one (1) front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide a 10' setback. 2. Where a home site is adjacent to a landscape buffer easement or lake maintenance easement under the Master Concept Plan for Single-family and Two-family/Duplex Residential Only, and it is a separately platted tract, the principal and accessory structure setback on the platted residential PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 7 of 19 March 8,2016 lot may be reduced to 0 feet where it abuts the easement/tract. Where the LME is not a separate platted tract and is permitted to overlap into the platted residential lot up to 10 feet, the minimum principal and accessory structure setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet, as measured from the rear lot line. In no case shall principal or accessory structures be permitted in the LME. 3. If the parcel is directly accessed by a public or private road right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right of way line per LDC. Sidewalks shall be located in the right-of- way. 4. If the parcel is directly accessed by a private driveway, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge-of-pavement (if not curbed). This would apply to multi-family development tracts that do not have platted rights-of-way. 5. In order to support a canopy tree with a minimum 20-foot crown spread as required in LDC Section 4.06.05,individual lots must accommodate enough space for the entire 20-foot canopy to be located wholly within the lot boundaries,except where the lot is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement and/or landscape buffer easement,in which case,a portion of the required 20-foot canopy may protrude into such area. This applies to all residential lots within the PUD. 6. Lake bank setback is 20 feet. Staff determined the development standards of the proposed single-family and two-family/duplex residential uses would be compatible and complimentary to the surrounding land uses and cluster housing standards,generally. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: This MPUD was previously approved with two (2) deviations pursuant to Ordinance 14-24. The petitioner is now seeking to amend one (1) the existing deviations and proposes six (6) new deviations. The deviations are itemized in Exhibit E of the PUD Document. The petitioner's justification and staff analysis/recommendation are as follows: Amended Deviation#1 A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.N which establishes the minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet to be utilized, to instead establish that all internal roadways, if platted, shall be subject to a 50- foot right-of-way configuration for the Master Concept Plan for Commercial,Mixed Use and Multi- family Only and a 45-foot right-of-way for the Master Concept Plan for Single-family and Two- family/Duplex Residential Only. Petitioner's Rationale: "The reduced roadway width will provide the necessary infrastructure requirements, including 5' internal sidewalks, standard 10' wide travel lanes and utility easements (see attached cross section). Additionally, the right—of—way will be privately maintained by the future Homeowners Association(HOA).Studies have determined that reduced right—of—way widths act as a traffic calming feature and will assist in maintaining public health, safety[,] and welfare within the community. Please refer to the enclosed right—of—way cross section,which demonstrates PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 8 of 19 March 8,2016 the requisite infrastructure can fit within the proposed width. The Applicant has also secured approval from the Engineering Division via the attached email correspondence from John Houldsworth. Please note the 50-foot right-of-way for the Commercial,Mixed-Use and Multi-Family Only master plan was approved pursuant to Ordinance 14-24." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: This MPUD was previously approved for a 10-foot deviation, which reduced the minimum width of the right-of-way to 50 feet for the Commercial and Mixed version of the Master Plan. No change is being proposed to the Commercial and Mixed use version of the Master Plan. This request would be to reduce the width of the right-of-way to 45 feet for the version of the master plan that proposes single-family and two-family/duplex residential uses. Sidewalks would be incorporated into the design in both versions. Staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in this instance,reducing the width of the proposed right-of-way to 45 feet would not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community; therefore, staff concurs with the applicant's justification. Existing Deviation#2 (no change proposed) A deviation from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1 which establishes the maximum floor area ratio of 0.45, to instead establish that the maximum floor area ratio be 0.65 for assisted living facilities. Petitioner's Rationale: "Approved pursuant to Ordinance 14-24." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Approved pursuant to Ordinance 14-24. No change is being requested in connection with this amendment. Proposed Deviation#3 When only single-family or two-family/duplex dwellings are proposed: Deviation from LDC Section Deviation from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height, to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height, subject to approval under temporary sign permit procedures in the LDC. The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 90 days per calendar year. This deviation will remain valid for a period not to exceed three (3) years, commencing from the date this amendment was approved. Petitioner's Rationale: "The requested deviation will allow for a banner sign announcing the project's grand opening and/or available unit sales, at a scale that has been previously approved for other residential communities within Collier County. The deviation will provide additional signage area to assist in marketing efforts, while protecting viewsheds from Airport—Pulling Road.The sign will be temporary in nature, and will undergo the requisite temporary sign permit process in accordance with Section 5.04.06 of the LDC." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff evaluated this deviation by noting its two (2) primary components: Sign Area/Height and Length of Time. The analysis of these components are as PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 9 of 19 March 8,2016 follows: Sign Area/Height- A temporary use permit is required for the placement of any temporary ground sign on residentially zoned properties and such sign shall not exceed four(4) square feet or three(3) feet in height in accordance with LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e. In evaluating the size/height portion of this request, staff refers to the deviations approved for two (2) different projects: Royal Palm International Academy and the Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples RPUD(formerly known as Mirasol). Pursuant to Ordinance 15-56,the Royal Palm International Academy PUD was approved with a sign deviation allowing a temporary banner sign up to 200 square feet with a maximum 4 feet in height and 50 feet in length. For the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples RPUD, a sign deviation was approved allowing a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet and eight(8)feet in height for a maximum of 28 calendar days per year. Length of Time - According to LDC Section 5.04.05.A.3, a temporary sign may be placed on a property as follows: The County Manager or designee may grant nonrenewable temporary use permits of up to 14 days duration, such that during any calendar year the sum total duration of all permits for such events for that location does not exceed 28 days. While the deviation approved in connection with the Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples RPUD did not allow a time span in excess of the LDC,the Royal Palm International Academy was approved for a maximum of 90 calendar days per year during season, which was defined as November 1 through April 30. The deviation further states, "The banner sign must be setback a minimum of 100 feet from the Livingston Road edge of pavement, and it shall be installed on the Camden Lakes masonry wall located on the western side of Livingston Road." Based on the above analysis and the applicant's justification, staff recommends APPROVAL of this requested deviation. Proposed Deviation#4 When only single-family or two-family/duplex dwellings are proposed: Deviation from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b,which permits two (2) ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet,to allow for two(2) ground or wall signs at the project entrance with a combined sign area of 80 s.f. Petitioner's Rationale: "The proposed deviation will allow for additional design flexibility and ensure visibility of the community from adjacent roadways. This deviation request is typical of similar master planned residential communities throughout Collier County. The proposed signage will undergo the requisite permitting prior to construction." StaffAnalysis and Recommendation: The LDC allows for up to two(2)ground or wall signs at each entrance to a multi-family or single-family development. Such ground or wall signs, when PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 10 of 19 March 8,2016 combined, shall not exceed 64 square feet, and shall not exceed the height or length of the wall or gate upon which it is located. If two (2)identical signs are proposed, each would be 32 square feet. This deviation would essentially allow an increase to the size of each sign by eight(8) square feet. When evaluating this deviation, staff considered the requested size of the sign and compared it to signs constructed on other residential developments located within close proximity to the subject site. Staff research revealed that the signs constructed in the surrounding residential developments (and those within close proximity), such as"Lakeside of Naples"in Citrus Gardens PUD;"Emerald Lakes"in Emerald Lakes PUD;"Walden Oaks"of Lone Oak PUD; and"The Oasis Apartments" in Keystone PUD did not have any sign size deviations approved for them. All the aforementioned signs have been constructed along Airport-Pulling Road, a six (6)-lane divided right-of-way between Vanderbilt Beach Road to the north and Cougar Lane to the south. It should be noted the abutting property to the north of the subject property(e.g., "HarborChase of Naples" in Brighton Gardens PUD) is considered a commercial development, and therefore, it is allowed to have a larger sign than if it were a residential project. Therefore, based on the above analysis and the applicant's lack of compelling justification, staff recommends DENIAL of this requested deviation. Proposed Deviation#5 When only single-family or two-family/duplex dwellings are proposed: Deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, which prohibits dead-end streets, to allow dead-end streets as shown on the Master Concept Plan for Residential Only. 1 Petitioner's Rationale: "The Applicant is requesting dead—end stubs at the terminus of the proposed private, local streets specific to Master Concept Plan Option B, in order to efficiently utilize the property's developable area.The maximum length of the proposed dead—end streets will not exceed 150 feet, and will service a maximum of four(4) dwelling units per street. The proposed design is in compliance with state and local fire safety standards. Therefore, the requested deviation will not negatively impact public health, safety[,] or welfare and will provide for design flexibility within this infill development parcel." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. As noted in the petitioners rationale the proposed dead-ends are limited in length and the number of units served and meet fire safety standards. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Proposed Deviation#6 When only single-family or two-family/duplex dwellings are proposed: Deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum wall height of six (6) feet in residential zoning PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 11 of 19 March 8,2016 districts, to allow for a maximum wall height of eight (8) feet along the Airport-Pulling Road frontage. Petitioner's Rationale: "The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening and mitigation of noise pollution resulting from traffic along Airport[-Pulling] Road, a 4—lane divided arterial roadway. The Applicant is proposing enhanced plantings to screen the wall and provide for attractive views from the roadway, including 30" shrubs at the time of planting for the rear hedgerow, and enhanced grass/groundcover. Please refer to the enclosed buffer/wall cross section. Approval of this deviation will serve to promote public health, safety[,] and welfare, as well as enhance the MPUD." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant is requesting a two (2)-foot increase over the maximum allowable wall height of the wall along Airport-Pulling Road, which is a well-traveled roadway in the County. Zoning staff concurs with the applicant's justification that an increase in wall height would help provide additional screening and lessen traffic noise. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation. Proposed Deviation#7 When only single-family or two-family/duplex dwellings are proposed: Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2., which requires all new individual trees to have an average mature spread or crown of greater than 20 feet,to allow for an average mature spread or crown of 15 feet.The canopy tree species will be limited to holly, satin leaf, and little gem magnolia. Petitioner's Rationale: "The proposed residential community is an infill project with a compact, clustered development footprint. The proposed single-family lots are 45 feet in width, while the two—family attached/duplex lots are 35 feet in width.Due to the smaller lot widths proposed,canopy trees with a 20' spread are not readily accommodated, and may result in potential conflicts with infrastructure, driveway, sidewalks as the trees mature overtime. The Applicant is proposing a selection of canopy trees with a 15' spread that will not conflict with infrastructure at maturity.The proposed trees will meet the intent of the LDC to provide for general trees within new development, while recognizing the spatial constraints associated with this clustered, infill project." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: According to LDC Section 4.06.05.A.1, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 3,000 square feet of pervious open space,which essentially means that each lot must have a canopy tree. Many species of canopy trees require a 20-foot wide planting area, at minimum,to accommodate future canopy and root spread. The problem arises when planting areas and pervious spaces are limited due to physical impervious barriers (e.g., houses, roof overhangs, driveways, sidewalks, accessory structures, etc.) and other competing interests (e.g., property boundaries, easements, etc.). As a means of alleviating the competition, the applicant is proposing that up to 50%of the required trees for the MPUD consists of a grouping of palm tree species. Palm species have a root ball, and their root system does not require as extensive physical area as does for many hardwood species. Based on the above analysis and the applicant's justification, staff recommends APPROVAL of this requested deviation. PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 12 of 19 March 8,2016 Proposed Deviation#8 When only single-family or two-family/duplex dwellings are proposed: Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a,which allows no more than 30%of the required canopy trees to be substituted by palms (where groupings of three (3) palms are the equivalent of one (1) canopy tree); to allow no more than 50%of the required canopy trees to be substituted by palms. Petitioner's Rationale: "The Applicant is requesting a higher percentage of palm trees to substitute for the canopy tree requirements due to the clustered development program. Palm trees are more readily accommodated on the clustered lots due to their reduced spread and root systems. The Applicant will maintain a minimum of 50% of the required trees as canopy trees, with the species types noted in deviation 7 above.The deviation will uphold the intent of the LDC to provide general trees within new development with an appropriate mix of species, while recognizing the spatial constraints associated within this clustered, infill project." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: According to LDC Section 4.06.05.A.1, one(1) canopy tree is required for each 3,000 square feet of pervious open space,which essentially means that each lot must have a canopy tree. Many species of canopy trees require a 20-foot wide planting area, at minimum,to accommodate future canopy and root spread. The problem arises when planting areas and pervious spaces are limited due to physical impervious barriers (e.g., houses, roof overhangs, driveways, sidewalks, accessory structures, etc.) and other competing interests (e.g., property boundaries, easements, etc.). As a means of alleviating the competition, the applicant is proposing that up to 50%of the required trees for the MPUD consists of a grouping of palm tree species. Palm species have a root ball, and their root system does not require as extensive physical area as does for many hardwood species. Based on the above analysis and the applicant's justification, staff recommends APPROVAL of this requested deviation. FINDINGS OF FACT: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation,the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC section 10.02.08": 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas,traffic and access, drainage, sewer,water,and other utilities. The proposed option of allowing single-family and two-family/duplex dwellings would be PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 13 of 19 March 8,2016 compatible with the approved uses and existing development in the area. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments,or for amendments in those proposed,particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to obtain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP within the Growth Management Plan (GMP) Consistency portion of this Staff Report(or within an accompanying memorandum). 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses,which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis Section of this Staff Report, staff is of the opinion the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. Both Master Plans show a Type "C" Buffer would be created along the west property line. Landscape Buffers(of varying types dependent on which Master Plan is utilized) would be installed along the north, south, and east property lines as well. The MPUD would also contain common themes related to architecture,signage,lighting,and landscaping as identified in the Developer Commitments (Exhibit F)of the PUD Document. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. According to a note on the Exhibit C — Master Plan for Single-family and Two- family/Duplex, the project would provide 13.03 acres or 60%of the 21.72-acre site as open space. This open space includes areas such as lakes,buffers,pervious area within the rights- of-way and on individual lots, and other open space. Therefore, the amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. Also, the maximum lot coverage for all buildings is capped at 35% for the total project as per General Note #1 in the Developer Commitments (Exhibit F) of the PUD Document. If this amendment is approved, usable open space would be further addressed at the time of Site Development Plan(SDP)or plat(PPL)review,whichever is applicable. PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 14 of 19 March 8,2016 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities,both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or PPL), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. The applicant has committed to pay their proportionate share of intersection improvements to the intersection of Airport- Pulling Road and Orange Blossom Drive which is currently under study by the County. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. No changes are proposed to the MPUD boundary. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations,or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The petitioner is seeking two amend one (1) existing deviation and requesting six (6) new deviations. Staff supports the proposed amendment to Deviation #1 and most of the new deviations (i.e.,#3,#5,#6, #7, and#8),with the exception of Deviation#4. Staff does not support this deviation based on the applicant's lack of compelling justification for it. Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report for a more extensive examination of this and the other deviations. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 15 of 19 March 8,2016 Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. Staff determined the proposed residential land uses in connection with this amendment are appropriate for this area of the County. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. This amendment would not change the MPUD zoning of the subject property. The petitioner is requesting to add single-family and two-family residential land uses to the existing MPUD. Adding these types of dwellings would be akin to creating a PUD (or an RPUD). The abutting land to the west is zoned PUD and developed with single-family homes. The adjacent land to the east is zoned PUD and developed with residential uses. Therefore, approval of this amendment would not create a district unrelated to adjacent or nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The boundaries of the MPUD would not be altered by this proposed amendment. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Staff does not anticipate the new uses would adversely impact living conditions in the neighboring community. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development,or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project at this time. The project is subject to the Transportation commitments contained in the PUD ordinance, which includes provisions to address public safety. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; The proposed change will not create a drainage problem as the applicant will be required to submit a SFWMD permit and all required stormwater documentation to County staff to be evaluated during the development review process. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; It is not anticipated that this amendment would significantly reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 16 of 19 March 8,2016 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value.There is no guarantee that the project will be marketed in a manner comparable to the surrounding developments. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The abutting and adjacent lands are already developed. Longview Center,which is currently vacant land located in close proximity to the subject property, was previously approved for mixed-use development(commercial and residential). Staff does not anticipate the proposed amendment at the subject site would be a deterrent to the improvement of the vacant Longview Center to the southeast or any other adjacent property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment,then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact,the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The property may still be developed within the parameters of the current PUD Document; however,there are no substantial reasons to prohibit the inclusion of the requested residential uses. The petition can be evaluated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff s opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC;and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 17 of 19 March 8,2016 ICI 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration,and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal,state,and local development regulations during the site development plan (SDP) or platting approval process(PPL),whichever is applicable,and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by county staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD document. The concurrency review for adequate public facilities is determined at the time of an SDP or PPL, whichever Master Plan is applicable. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety,and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING(NIM): The agents conducted a duly noticed NIM on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at the Collier County Headquarters Library at 2385 Orange Blossom Drive. Please see copies of the summary of this meeting in Attachment#4-Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary and Legal Notices. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on February 25, 2016. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the BCC with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: 1) Proposed Ordinance 2) Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review 3) Density Map 4) Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary and Legal Notices 5) Application& Support Material PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD Page 18 of 19 March 8,2016 PREPARED BY: 2�� i 2 0- /�o ERIC JOHNS° , AICP, CFM, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIV ION i REVIEWED BY: (3e4 .12: 0-3• /6 RAYM vil D V. BELL S, ZONING MANAGER`- DATE ZONIN DIVISION ,./71-7., 2--24 1 t4 MIKE BOSI, AICP,DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION APPROVED BY: i ASP , _ _ .2 .---2 - / A S F'� CH,DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT i all_dej",{.„...... \sc DAVID S. WILKISON, P.E. DATE DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PUDA-PL20150001084: BUCKLEY MPUD Page 19 of 19 ATTACHMENT #1 Proposed Ordinance ICI ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-24, THE BUCKLEY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO ADD SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS AND TWO-FAMILY, DUPLEX DWELLINGS AS PERMITTED USES IN THE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE PUD, TO ADD A MASTER PLAN FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO A MIXED USE, MULTIFAMILY OR ALL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, TO ADD DEVIATIONS TO ALLOW MORE SIGNAGE AND TO ALLOW DEAD-END STREETS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD (CR 31) AND ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 21.7+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PUDA- PL20150001804) WHEREAS, on June 10, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 14-24 which established the Buckley Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning classification; and WHEREAS, Alexis V. Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering, P.A. and Richard Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. representing Pulte Home Corporation,petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the Buckley MPUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,that: SECTION ONE: The MPUD Document attached as Exhibits "A" through "F" to Ordinance no. 14-24 is hereby amended and replaced with the MPUD Document attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through"F"and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. [15-CPS-01466/1240514/1j 44 Buckley MPUD 1PUDA-PL20150001084 2/23/16 1 of 2 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2016. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk DONNA FIALA, Chairwoman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A—Permitted Uses Exhibit B—Development Standards Exhibit C—Master Concept Plan for Commercial, Mixed Use,and Multifamily Only, and Master Concept Plan for Single Family and Two Family/ Duplex Residential Only Exhibit D—Legal Description Exhibit E—List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F—List of Developer Commitments [15-CPS-01466/1240514/1] 44 Buckley MPUD\PUDA-PL20 1 50001 084 2/23/16 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES: The Buckley MPUD is planned for up to 239 residential dwelling units; or, 162,750 square feet of limited commercial uses or non-residential uses consisting of retail, service and/or office uses; or a combination of the two as provided for below.The gross project density will be a maximum of 11 residential units per acre.The Master Concept Plan shall be designed to ensure the harmonious placement of all of the uses in a manner that achieves a unified and integrated land use plan, and one that incorporates a uniform plan of development enhanced by complimentary landscape improvements. Residential(R) The maximum number of residential units shall not exceed 239 units.For each acre of land utilized for residential purposes, 7,500 square feet of non-residential square footage will be eliminated from the total square footage allowable identified in the Commercial section of this MPUD. Note: See page 3 for reduction of residential units when commercial square footage is built. If a fractional acreage is built, the corresponding units of commercial shall be reduced and rounded up to the nearest whole number i.e. 0.5=1, .4=0. Residential development will be designed to accommodate a full range of residential multi-family dwelling types,compatible recreational facilities,essential services and customary accessory uses. Should the site develop fully as a residential project,no commercial facilities will be constructed. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following primary uses: A. Principal Uses The maximum number of residential units is 239. 1. Townhouse dwellings 2. Multi-family dwellings 3. Single-family detached dwellings 4. � dunlex dwellings 5 Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals(BZA)or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Temporary Uses(per the LDC) 1. Model Units Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL201 S 1084 Stilcet#ireugh Page is deleted ag e1of18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underline text is added 2. Project information and Sales centers 3. Construction administrative offices for the developer and authorized contractors and consultants, including temporary access ways and parking areas. 4. Sales and administrative offices for the developer, project management or managing development association, including temporary access ways and parking areas. C. Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this District, including neighborhood community recreational facilities and property management and maintenance structures intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 2. Garages and carports. 3. Administration facilities intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 4. Swimming Pools,Tennis courts and other similar recreational facilities and buildings to serve residents and their guests. 5. Guardhouses and Gatehouses. 6. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses,as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals(BZA)or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 StFikethcough text is deleted Page 2 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Under'',- text is added _ i Commercial (C) The maximum gross square footage of all non-residential uses,except group housing uses, shall not exceed 162,750 square feet.For each acre of non-residential square footage built, 11 residential dwelling units will be eliminated from the maximum allowable number of residential units in this MPUD. Should the site develop fully as a non-residential project, no residential dwelling units will be constructed. Note: See page 1 for reduction of commercial floor space when residential is built. If a fractional acreage is built, the corresponding units of residential shall be reduced and rounded up to the nearest whole number i.e. 0.5 = 1, .4 = 0. For the purpose of this section all uses are those allowed as either permitted or conditional uses in the C-1,C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts of the LDC in effect as the date of adoption of this MPUD except as limited below.All such conditional uses shall be deemed permitted uses under this MPUD without the necessity of a separate conditional use application. No building or structure,or part thereof, shall be erected,altered or used,or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following primary uses: A.Principal Uses,permitted by right: Unless otherwise provided for in this Section,all permitted and conditional uses of the following districts: 1. C-1, Commercial Professional and General Office District in effect as of the date of adoption of this MPUD Ordinance except: • Homeless Shelter • Soup Kitchens • Residential dwelling units 2. C-2, Commercial Convenience District, in effect as of the date of adoption of this MPUD Ordinance except: • Gasoline Service Stations(SIC Group 5541) • Homeless Shelters • Soup Kitchens • Residential dwelling units • SIC Group 5411,Convenience Stores with fuel pumps only 3.C-3 Commercial Intermediate District,in effect as of the adoption of this MPUD Ordinance except: • Marinas(SIC Group 4493) • Automotive Services(SIC Group 7549) • Homeless Shelters • Hospitals(SIC Groups 8062-8069) • Soup Kitchens Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Stikethrongh text is deleted Page 3 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underline text is added • Residential dwelling units • SIC Group 5411,Convenience Stores with fuel pumps only • Gasoline Service Stations(SIC Group 5541) 4. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. B.Accessory Uses 1. Kiosks which may be used for retail purposes or provide site related services within the square footage allowance for commercial purposes and otherwise subject to integrated parking requirements for all commercial space. 2. Sales and lease offices to serve this project only. C. Prohibited Uses 1.Residential uses shall not be integrated with commercial uses in the same building. 2.The following C-3 Conditional Uses shall be prohibited: a.Ancillary Plants b. Bowling Centers(7933) c. Coin operated amusement devices(7993) d. Drinking Places (5813). All establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption are subject to the locational requirements of section 5.05.01. e.Homeless Shelters f. Social Services (8322, offender rehabilitation agencies, offender self-help agencies, parole offices, probation offices, public welfare centers, refugee services,and settlements houses,only) g. Soup Kitchens Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Steiket1reugli text is deleted Page 4 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underling text is added EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Table I below sets forth the development standards for Multi-Family Residential land uses within the proposed Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision Plat. TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TOWNHOUSES MULTI-FAMILY RECREATION SINGLE- TWO- DWELLINGSS FACILITIES& FAMILY, FAMILY/ MAINTENANCE DETACHED DUPLEX STRUCTURES MINIMUM 3,000 square feet N/A N/A 5,400 s.f. 3.500 s.f. LOT AREA MINIMUM 30 feet N/A N/A 35 feet LOT WIDTH MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,200 square feet 1,000 square feet N/A 1,200,51 750 s.f. OF UNITS PUD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 t 30 feet (FROM AIRPORT- PULLING ROAD) MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 220 f (FROM NORTH BOUNDARY& SOUTH BOUNDARY) MINIMUM BUILDING 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 25 feet 25 feet SETBACK' (FROM WEST BOUNDARY) LAKES 0 feet from the 0 feet from the 0 feet from the 0 feet from the 0 feet from LME LME LME LME the LME MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS Front: Principal Structure 20 feet 20 feet N/A Q 20 feet Accessory Structure 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet SPS SPS Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Stfiketlifeogli text is deleted Page 5 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underline text is added TOWNHOUSE MULTI-FAMILY RECREATION SINGLE- TWO- DWELLINGS FACILITIES& FAMILY FAMILY/ MAINTENANCE DETACHED DUPLEX STRUCTURES Side: Principal Structure 20 feet '/2 of the SBH N/A 5 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet SPS SPS Rear: Principal Structure 10 feet V2 of the BH N/A 10 feet3.8 10 feet3.8 Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 3'8 5 feet3'8 Minimum Distance Between Structures: Principal Structure 10 feet '/2 of the SBH N/A 10 feet 0 or 10 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet 0 feet 10 feet 0 or 10 feet MAXIMUM HEIGHT2 Zoned: Principal Structure 3-stories not to 3-stories not to exceed 45 feet exceed 45 feet N/A 35 feet aka Accessory Structure 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet SPS = Actual: Principal Structure 50 feet 50 feet N/A 40 f 40 feet Accessory Structure 32 feet 32 feet 32 feet SPS SPS 1. Dumpsters and dumpster enclosures shall not encroach into the 100 foot setback from the Western MPUD boundary. 2. Garages and carports shall be 10 feet from principal structures if detached. There will be a minimum of a 23 foot setback from the back of a sidewalk to front load garages.For corner lots, only one (1) front yar• setback shall be required. The yard that, dpeLnot contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide a 10' setback ' 3. _: :-- --- : : - : : • :: : ::: :: . _ - : _- 1' - •:: Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Striket#irough text is deleted Page 6 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 1 Jnderline text is added LDC requires ents. Where a home site is adjacent to a landscape buffer easement or lake maintenance easement under the Master Concept Plan for Single-Family and Two- Family/Duplex Residential Only,and it is a separately platted tract,the principal and accessory structure setback on the platted residential lot may be reduced to 0 feet where it abuts the easement/tract. Where the LME is not a separate platted tract and is permitted to overlap into the platted residential lot up to 10 feet, the minimum principal and accessory structure setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet, as measured from the rear lot line. In no case shall principal or accessory structures be permitted in the LME. 4. If the parcel is directly accessed by a public or private road right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right of way line per LDC. Sidewalks shall be located in the right-of-way. 5. If the parcel is directly accessed by a private driveway, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge-of-pavement (if not curbed). This would apply to multi-family development tracts that do not have platted rights-of-way. 6.Multi-family or townhouse Residential buildings within 150' of the west property line shall not have west facing balconies. 7. No building shall exceed three stories in height and 45 feet(actual height) and under building parking is prohibited. 8. In order to support a canopy tree with a minimum 20-foot crown s•read as required in LDC Section 4.06.05, individual lots must accommodate enough space for the entire 20-foot canon to be located wholly within the lot boundaries., except where the lot is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement and/or landscape buffer easement, in which case, a portion of the required 20-foot canopy may protrude into such area. This applies tQ all residential lots within the PUD. BH=Building Height SBH=Sum of Building Heights LME=Lake Maintenance Easement SPS=Same As Principal Structure Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Str-iket#xeugh text is deleted Page 7 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underline text is added TABLE II COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Table II below sets forth the development standards for commercial land uses within the proposed Mixed Use PUD (MPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat,consistent with C-3 zoning. PRINCIPAL USE ACCESSORY USE MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 square feet N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 feet N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 700 square feet(ground floor) N/A MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO 0.65 for Assisted Living Facilities PUD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 25 feet 25 feet (FROM AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD) MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 40 feet 40 feet (FROM NORTH BOUNDARY& SOUTH BOUNDARY) MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 100 feet 100 feet (FROM WEST BOUNDARY) MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN 20 feet 0 feet(principal to STRUCTURES accessory) LAKES 0 feet from the LME 0 feet from the LME MAXIMUM HEIGHT • Zoned: 3-stories not to exceed 45 feet? 35 feet • Actual: 50 feet 42 feet 1.Dumpsters and dumpster enclosures shall not encroach into the 100 foot setback from the Western MPUD boundary. 2. Setback from a lake for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0')provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design.Architectural bank treatments shall include any structural materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed to LDC requirements. 3. Individual commercial users shall be limited to a maximum gross floor area of 100,000 square feet. Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Strikethreugh text is deleted Page 8 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underling text is added 4.No building shall exceed three stories in height and under building parking is prohibited. 5. Drive-through establishments shall be limited to a maximum of four. Only one of these drive-through establishments shall be allowed for a fast-food restaurant and it must be located within 300 feet of the Airport Road right-of-way.No drive-through establishment shall have more than three drive-through lanes and all drive-throughs must be architecturally integrated into the main building. 6. Stand-alone retail buildings larger than 50,000 square feet shall be limited to two stories and 35 feet zoned height,45 feet actual height. SPS=Same as Principal Structure LME=bandseape Lake Maintenance Easement I , Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Striketbreegh text is deleted Page 9 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underline text is added EXHIBIT C MASTER CONCEPT PLAN (COMMERCIAL,MIXED USE &MIJLTI-FAMILY ONLY) , :.•• -...r 0.116N1t3 .. ''. It .r^... r t u.rrswnwal ,..• k w I I b 0 i .I , 1 _-_-11" - la 1 We , i li a [------ ` ,OW f li 1, $ -i i I i I. +I 1 I ,j i, �)�� lir g -Ii 1} II tsa0 48 5 5 �C{I , Z ii x E 111' 0b i * : . I. . W CO i I 8 1 r, % g 1 , 11 ilig g c, , 1 'I - 1 '111' 14 _ (III )11 1 i i ii I. i. iiil i f i, „. 1 , If II •, It 3 1 i I' k----- i 9' 1 4 Ii z 2 Isi 8' i 1111 � t _ _J to < i < till 1 Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Striketlhretuglt text is deleted Page 10 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underlipe text is added J:1456-01 Buckley MPUD1Drawings-Exhibits1456-01-E05 MPUD Master Plan Current Plans445601 E0502.dwg fig 1 0 W fsA A 12 I II I x I It II og-w m I► \vim r / II i r W ( >, ) , IC 1 f,II Im 'Ii a \ r. Il Iii Ili 5 y 8 ( r I 1 m ?1 . i\ 1 g i i b I ..T ?I N II 1 � I II iiME—J l . , II1i I • I ,I :, 4 II ! g it " < D I� lii )g L--, ko 4 i 04 MI I II h I1 ON II 51<� it ;II 'I L — — F= - -1- - - -1 m Al z m Al 2r P -6 I g9a 3F I r P.'' 4 PLAN REVISIONS V \ WALDROP c I Q 10/05/15 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS BUCKLEY MPUD ENGINEERING ci i ® 12/11/15 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS 1/ 12/27/16 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS EXHIBIT"C"-MASTER PLAN(SINGLE FAMILY AND ""w�` i I ® TWO FAMILY/DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL ONLY) e� 00k0o0' ,;,I4"" ,�, t II J:\456-01 Buckley MPUD\Drawings-Exhibits\456-01-E05 MPUD Master Plan\Current Plans445601E0502.dwg J O, tlt A N W / _ _ ` III "I O .'D .Z7 W ` -< $ 8r vD -' C) cll' iii O—, 2 = m • m zoo 0_ °5T 70 Dm Zm m m + m 13 mom(4 CnmT mZ rA z Dg x'a rtA� p Z b m -1130 nD0-i Z3 ZK 00 O D Z D cWu, m3s y0 0cr, ,z v -< °cD °<° mil cgm0Z ° mmm °m 7<a,° 2z m� Dn m 0 g 7) D -mc _0m 0 m z OC ZD 471 [� �r m Q3 nWn -ImD z DO &5 mcm) DM 0 mm x°co 0 -n D m < Z DM-1--I m071 O rn 0 m0 mm Z ". i0 m m r z -i0 m1 C DD rng 0 z m> mZ --�n� � Om m Y m O 7 >T, 0 O D �m 01:0 w z z OWE' r CA Z _'9 D (w j1 0m -oC Z C 0 O O E� � ZZ C W Z� Z r W N 71 N O W m pZ X1�m SS C _IZ "I CO N V O cm r- z m 5 mm 3 ,o m ?m m mCo >mo C) �m Z H X D -1 OZ m o m �� c 0m z 00 �Z D w ZZ o m m0 Z —1 g - it v N D z y0 z 4:, 0 a o 0 o a m> M M 00 mT r • m C) z m R m m 0 m Z V' m 0 l� 0 m O D M• r r 0 0 O C) > 0 Z J '‘i d PLAN REVISIONS 21 i @I A\ 10/05/15 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS BUCKLEY MPUD i.. \ WALDROP m g , /\ ENGINEERING 12/11115 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS s EXHIBIT"C"-MASTER PLAN(SINGLE FAMILY AND .,04 -w q en t' TWO FAMILY I DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL ONLY) ,°+ib0".61.10'."i'°"""""'"""'"""" EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PART OF THE EAST 'h OF SECTION 2,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE SOUTH 2° 13' 05"EAST 1,589.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°59' 01" WEST 100.08 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 31 (AIRPORT PULLING ROAD)AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 31, SOUTH 2° 13' 05" EAST 1,989.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 51' 40" WEST 500.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2° 13' 05" WEST 1,990.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 59' 01"EAST 500.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE WEST 10 FEET OF THE EAST 25 FEET THEREOF AND THE EAST 15 FEET THEREOF AS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2445, PAGE 3258, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Strikethr-augh text is deleted Page 13 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underline text is added EXHIBIT E DEVIATIONS: Nothing in this PUD Document shall approve a deviation to the LDC unless it is listed in this Exhibit E. 1. A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.N which establishes the minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet to be utilized, to instead establish that all internal roadways, if platted, shall be subject to a 50-foot right-of-way configuration for the Master Concept Plan for Commercial, Mixed Use and Multi-Family Only and a 45-foot rig t-of-w. for the Master Concept Plan for Single-Family and Two-Family/Du•lex Residential Onl 10.0 45.0'ROW 10.0' PUE PUE 10.5 2.0%. 10.0' 10.D' 2.0' 10.6' TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE 3.0' 5.0' 2.5' 3.0' 5.0' 2.5' 2%MAX 2%MIN 2%MIN 2%MAX I SIDEWALK SIDEWALK VALLEY GLITTER GYP,) 1-1/2'ASPHALT(TYPE S-III)PLACED IN TWO(2)314•LIFTS-OPTIONAL 8•LIMEROCK BASE(LBR 100) 12•STABILIZED SUBGRADE(1.3R 40) TYPICAL 45' ROW SECTION N1'S 2. A deviation from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1 which establishes the maximum floor area ratio of 0.45,to instead establish that the maximum floor area ratio be 0.65 for assisted living facilities. 3. When only single-famil • •- .II' dunlex dwellings are • ••• -• •- ', '•• •u LDC Section Deviation from LDC Section 5,04.06.A.3.e which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in heiaht to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height, subject to approval under temporary sign permit procedures in the LDC. The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 90 days per calendar year This deviation will remain valid for a period not to exceed three(3)years,commencing from the date this amendment was approved, 4 •-• •t 'n. -- •s it • • •-f. a' • ..1-. • • - lin• - •r.•. -•• D- '- '41fr4 • LD ection 5.06.02.B.614 which permits two 2) around or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sigh area of 64 s•uare feet.to allow for two(2)around • •' • •- • ••- -• •.• - • • . •u•'•-4 _I . • :1 Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Strikethrough text is deleted Page 14 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underline text is added I 5. .-. . 1 i ' --f.mil . I\. .- .. it /I. - .w- •i• . - .r... -.: I-v'. '.I eel LDC Section 6.06.O1.J, whic •rohibits dead-end streets, to allow dead-end streets as shown on the Master Concept Plan for Residential Only, 6. W.-, enl i • -- . u'l . k .-f...• . , . -. 8 . - ' • .r- . ... -.• I- •• •me en LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum wall height of six (6 feet in residential zoning districts,to allow for a maximum wall height of eight (8) feet along the Airport Pulling Road frontage, ENHANCED HEDGEROW.30'HIGH SHRUB AT PLANTING&MAINTAINED AT 40' 10P TYP. _,-e„�,,. 30.0'O.C. '-1' HEDGEROW,24'HIGH SNRUB AT PtANTWG i MAMTA.JED AT 30' _ NlL'tA -, 1'� of , g 1:01' 41174. )”. A ''l 00 00CHDCOV 1 COM 10000C 00 00400C4 010.001414M :©:0SMIC�:C ,�:�'�: ►:©:©11010 `01 0 _` - r ` /.�.°/��i� 7- $C ENHANCEDGRASSIGROUNDCOJER B'FENDEW4LLBERMCOMBINATION 3 GAL,200 SF PER WOLF AIRPORT PULLING ROAD WALL/BUFFER 7. When only single-family or two-family/duplex dwellings are .roposed:Deviation from / ' '.. ' 1. 1 P • I• . -. .' - •- I. . .I.• •I. .. -- • .. . •'- mature spread or crown of• eater than 20 fee to allow for an average mature spread or crown of 15 feet. The canopy tree species will be limited to holly, satin leaf and little gem magnolia. 8. * 1- 1 •• ..' -- . I.' . . .- . If. . . . -. . . -l '.• - . ... -.• P- • ••. . . LDC Section 4.06.Q5.D.2.a, which allows no more than 30% of the required canopy -- s .- ., ' -. . ..1 ,! h•r- • . ._l• . . -- __..lu - ., 'vae. . ..- 1 .... -- • . . own. .. - .•• . 1% . .- -. .ir-. •n.. r-- . .- substituted by palms, Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Strike4#eagh text is deleted Page 15 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underline text is added EXHIBIT F DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS: GENERAL 1. Maximum lot coverage for all buildings is capped at 35%for the total project. 2. Pedestrian connections at the time of development order shall be provided to adjacent properties immediately north and south of the subject property, subject to permission being provided by adjacent property owners to allow for these connections, subject to safety concerns for the public.If single-family or two-family/duplex dwellin• are developed in accordance with the Master Concept Plan for Single-Family and Two-Familv/Dup ex Residential Only, a pedestria, interconnect will be prpv.ded to the south only. subject to permission being provided by adjacent property owners. 3. All buildings shall be connected with pedestrian pathways. 4. The PUD shall be developed with a common theme for architecture, signage, lighting and landscaping. 5. Once residential or commercial development commences. as evidenced by the is uance of !- f i • - .- - •. -• . .n or ..pi .'p . .n ... • .l h- pp, -r as - . .ls.a • i - development option that is not pursued/approved sh:11 be void ENVIRONMENTAL The development of the land within this PUD shall not be subject to the Native Preservation Standards found in Section 3.05.067 of the LDC due to the absence of native vegetation on the subject property. LANDSCAPE BUFFERS 1. The west landscape buffer adjacent to the Emerald Lakes Development shall be a 20 foot Type `C' buffer and contain a finished masonry wall and berm, or combination thereof, at least 6 feet in height and vegetation that is opaque within one(1)year of installation of any site related buildings.The minimum number of trees within the buffer shall be increased by a 50%, inclusive of palm trees or similar varieties. If single-family detached and/or two- family/duplex dwellings are developed in accordance w'th the Master Concept Pla for Single-Family and Two-Family/Duplex Residential Only for the entire site the 50% r-. - • ,- i••p•• . .p p _n.- • -- ,' s•, • ' . . -ri p• r-• .' -• 2. Within the Type `C' landscape buffer along the north property line, a six (6) foot finished masonry wall shall be constructed at the northwest corner for a distance of 80 feet along the northern boundary line within the landscape buffer for the Master Concept Plan for Commercial,Mixed Use and Multi-Family Only. Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 gtfi1Eetltreagh text is deleted Page 16 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underline text is added '1• -4,14'1 •- -• ,•. •r il. •- • ..l-x .w- lin• - .- - •.-. in a. • • - w' h - . - •. -. P .1 • in. - . i .•• . •- .t1i1 I • • R- '.-• hiI1 for the entire site, the north buffer shall be a 15' Type `B" buffer in accordance with the requirements Q the Land Development Code. The buffer shall maintain the six 6 foot finished masonry wall at the northwest corner for a distance of 80 feet along the northern boundary line, as shown on the Master Concept Plan for Si ale-Family and TWQ- Family/Duplex Residential Only, OUTDOOR LIGHTING 1. All pole lighting will be flat panel fixtures except where FPL lighting is used for a r- '.- i. -441 • •.- i . • .. - , ' h u. - •, -. P • t- i.- • •n1 2.Lighting within 30 feet of the perimeter of the project will utilize full cut off shields. 3.Any lighting within 50 feet of a residential property line external to the MPUD will be limited to 15 feet in height. OUTDOOR MUSIC Outdoor Music or amplified outdoor entertainment associated with commercial uses shall be prohibited between the hours of 10 pm and 10 am. TRANSPORTATION The development of the land within this PUD shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: 1. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses (both primary and ancillary) may not exceed 687 PM Peak Hour,two way trips. 2. The owner agrees to pay $10,000 to support enhancements to the Collier Area Transit -H •• • All .• -. • ._• 1- • .. •. - ,n. .1 4 '01 • . • 1- - • •- 16 , •. .1• • h- f •• of •- •lli• • _ r - • _• •- h. us bus stop will be located along the Buckley MPUD fronta•e. Payment will be due at the time of certificate of occupancy(CO)of the twenty-fifth(25th)unit, 3. The owner shall pay fair share costs of the intersection improvements at Airport Pulling Rd. and Orange Blossom Dr. based on the current intersection im•rovement stud . The current intersection study is projected to be completed in calendar year 2016 at which time the proportionate share calculations will be determined. If the study is not com.lete at time • S. . - ••11-/ • •- - b- - 4.$1. 1 ' .1 • ' . •-- • • 1- 1. • • ••• • 551.1 15 • -, .-. '. 1 111 11 • •• • •• . . ..• ' • 1- •I• - •. • .•.1 for the development,which shall be released when the owner •a s its fair share of the costs of the intersection improvements, Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Strikethrough text is deleted Page 17 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 Underline text is added I � MONITORING REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISIONS One entity(hereinafter the Managing Entity)shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD,and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD.At the time of this PUD approval,the Managing Entity is Airport Pulling Orange Blossom LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff,and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts,the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity,but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD are closed-out,then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 StFiketiveugli text is deleted Page 18 of 18 Last Revised:February 23,2016 underling text is added it 1 ATTACHMENT #2 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review Co er Co ti t Growth Management Department Zoning Division/Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: Eric Johnson,AICP, CFM, Principal Planner Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, and David Weeks,AICP, Growth Management Manager Comprehensive Planning Section,Zoning Division Date: February 23, 2016 Subject: Future Land Use Element(FLUE) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PUDA-PL20150001084 Rev:5 PETITION NAME: Buckley MPUD REQUEST: Requested changes included in this petition are: • Revise Exhibit A, Permitted Uses,to add single-family detached and two-family/duplex dwellings as permitted uses; • Revise Exhibit B, Development Standards, to add development regulations for single-family detached and two-family/duplex dwellings; • Add a second Exhibit C, PUD Master Plan,for residential single-family development program; • Revise Exhibit E, Deviations, to modify existing, and add new, deviations for residential only development (to allow 45-foot wide road right-of-way; modify project signage allowance; allow dead-end streets; increase wall height along Airport-Pulling Road; and, modify allowance/requirement for tree type and size. • Revise Exhibit F, Developer's Commitments,to provide for a lesser landscape buffer requirement along the northern property line if the site is developed with single-family dwellings; provide that once a development order is issued for a type of development per one of the two approved PUD Master Plans, the other Mater Plan becomes void; provide that a pedestrian interconnection is not required to the north if the site is developed with single-family dwellings; provide for different pole lighting if the site is developed with single-family dwellings; and, provide for fair share contribution towards Airport-Pulling Road/Orange Blossom Drive intersection improvements. LOCATION: The subject site, comprising±21.7 acres, is located on the west side of Airport-Pulling Road (CR 31) and +330 feet north of Orange Blossom Drive, immediately north of the Collier County Regional Library, in Section 2,Township 49 South, Range 25 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject site is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict, on the Future Land Use Map of the Collier County Growth Management Plan(GMP). In the Future Land Use Element(FLUE)of the GMP,this Subdistrict reads, "The intent of this Subdistrict, which comprises 21.7 acres, is to allow for limited retail, office and residential uses while allowing for the development of a mixed-use development. The Activity Centers to the North and South provide for large-scale commercial uses, while this Subdistrict is intended to promote convenience and intermediate commercial development to serve existing and future residential development in the immediate area. This Subdistrict will serve to reduce existing trip lengths for convenience and intermediate commercial services. Commercial uses for the purpose of this section are limited to those permitted and conditional uses allowed in the C-1,C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts except as noted below. The development of this Subdistrict will be governed by the following criteria." The site is zoned Buckley MPUD (Mixed Use Planned Unit Development) consistent with the Subdistrict. This petition does not seek to increase the number of DUs -currently approved at 239 DUs— nor add or make changes to commercial uses or intensities. A variety of changes are proposed, including: add dwelling unit types and corresponding development standards; add or modify several deviations; add or modify several developer commitments;add a new PUD Master Plan specific to the added DU types. The Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict criteria are listed below, each followed by staff comments in [bold]. 1. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. [The petitioner is requesting an amendment to an existing MPUD. Criterion met.] 2. The Subdistrict shall be developed with a common theme for architecture, signage, lighting and landscaping. [This requirement is included in Exhibit F, Developer Commitments, General, #3. Criterion met.] 3. Commercial uses will be capped at a maximum of 162,750 square feet of gross floor area. [This requirement is included in Exhibit A,beginning paragraph,and in Permitted Uses,Commercial. Criterion met.] 4. Residential uses are allowed at a density of 11 dwelling units per acre,calculated based upon the entire Subdistrict acreage, yielding a maximum of 239 dwelling units. [This allowance and limitation is listed in Exhibit A, beginning paragraph, and in Permitted Uses, Residential. Criterion met.] 5. Maximum lot coverage for buildings is capped at 35% for the total project. [This limitation is included in Exhibit F, Developer Commitments,General,#1. Criterion met.] 6. Residential uses shall not be integrated with commercial uses in the same building. [This limitation is included in Exhibit A,Permitted Uses, Commercial, Prohibited Uses,#1. Criterion met.] 7. For each acre of land utilized for residential purposes,7,500 square feet of commercial buildable square footage will be eliminated from the total square footage allowable. For each acre of commercial square footage built, 11 residential units will be eliminated from the maximum allowable number of residential units. [These allowances and limitation are included in Exhibit A, Residential,and Commercial. Criterion met.] 8. Pedestrian connections are encouraged to all perimeter properties. [Pedestrian connections to the north and south are generally provided for if the site is developed with commercial, mixed use,or multi-family uses,and to the south only if the site is developed with single family and/or two family/duplex uses, all within Exhibit F, Developer Commitments, General, #2. No connections are provided to the west, which is a developed residential community (Emerald Lakes PUD). Criterion met.] 9. Individual commercial users shall be limited to a maximum gross floor area of 100,000 square feet. [This limitation is included in Exhibit B, Development Standards, Table II, Commercial Development Standards,#3. Criterion met.] 10. No building shall exceed three stories in height with no allowance for under building parking. [This limitation is included in Exhibit B, Development Standards,Table II,Commercial Development Standards,#4. Criterion met.] 11. Drive-thru establishments shall be limited to a maximum of four. Only one of these drive-through establishments shall be allowed for a fast-food restaurant, and no drive-through establishment shall have more than three drive-through lanes. All drive-through lanes must be architecturally integrated into the main building. [These limitations and requirement are included in Exhibit B, Development Standards,Table II,Commercial Development Standards,#5). Criterion met.] 12. Gasoline service stations and convenience stores with fuel pumps are prohibited. [These prohibitions are included in Exhibit A, Commercial, A. Principal Uses permitted by right, exceptions,under#2(C-2)and#3(C-3). Criterion met.] 13. All buildings shall be connected with pedestrian pathways. [This requirement is included in Exhibit F,Developer Commitments,General,#3. Criterion met.] 14. A twenty-foot wide Type C landscape buffer shall be required along all perimeter property lines adjacent to residential use. [Non-residential uses lie to the north (adult living facility in the Brighton Gardens PUD)and south(Collier County Library headquarters)of the subject property; only lands to the west are developed with residential use (Emerald Lakes PUD). This requirement (for the western boundary) is included in Exhibit F, Developer Commitments, Landscape Buffers, #1, and is depicted on Exhibit C - both the existing and proposed second Master Plan. Criterion met.] Below is FLUE Policy 5.4, and FLUE Objective 7 and relevant policies, each followed by staff analysis in [bold text within brackets]. FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, surrounding land uses. [Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services Section's staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety.] Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions,and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County,the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects,where applicable. Policy 7.1 The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads,except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The one (1) proposed project entrance is provided from Airport-Pulling Road(CR 31),a minor Arterial (Urban and Rural)roadway as identified in the Collier 2025 Functional Classification Map of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan.] Policy 7.2 The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [The MPUD,as shown in the Master Plan, has internal access throughout this project. All parcels have internal access via the internal roads.] Policy 7.3 All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [Exhibit F, Developer Commitments,provides for a pedestrian interconnection to the north and south under the existing PUD Master Plan. Exhibit F provides for a pedestrian interconnection only to the south (to the Collier County Library Headquarters) under the proposed second PUD Master Plan. No vehicular interconnections are shown on the Master Plan. Staff has no objection to the single pedestrian interconnection under the new second Master Plan.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [The PUD amendment would allow for townhouse dwellings, multi-family dwellings, single-family detached dwellings, and two-family/duplex dwellings; will provide for open space and preservation area consistent with the Land Development Code (LDC) since no deviation was sought; the PUD allows an accessory use such as a clubhouse,which is sometimes used for civic uses,e.g. polling place;sidewalks will be provided as required by the LDC since no deviation was sought; and, pedestrian interconnection(s)is provided for under both PUD Master Plan options.] CONCLUSION Based on the above analysis,staff finds the subject petition consistent with the FLUE. cc: Michael Bosi,AICP, Director,Zoning Division Raymond V. Bellows, Manager,Zoning Services Section,Zoning Division CD/FLUE file PUDA-PL20150001084 Buckley MPUD REVS 2-23-16 1 ATTACHMENT #3 Density Map I Nisi I PI a Walgreen # Marker Lake Villas+T _ '1' " _ Zonin+g PUD i Densityo ,, . = _. F``unitain Park ,{ '11* ,ivrItgrian r. _- ,.—~ 'vz_t e ' a 'Q` ' k Vineyards I -,v7R ,' u. i_ De i 3 f- - ' ' 4 '1-'1' ' ---1,---'141t.d.<`--5-'11 .1 " , t*i ..,,,v, ilki,..l.' , i ' lir• '''.11,----'? ' ...,. ' ! d CZ— 1 'M Zoning: PUD ,I, ((\ a G\Tp> ' .' Sailors -A7"if /-/''1i*',,.. 0Q3,„i.-)c-v4 W.4.i‘t--'''i o'e-'1S'1.l,r t-,!.'\'-0,4„e 11',1i.',^.4.-,..', d i,.i''‘)-7-0 C!i 5 0. r1,f','1 ff f lig _ ID 1 Buckley MPUD E i l z t i � 'tF �° Emerald � . 11 a , Citrus Gardens T , 7y Y Y I Density:4.01 l' I PA'i Infif_1.117/o ,.,...........t...*..==' ''' �; fi 4 tl '..401110,t,- ?sir • PIp Zoning.rq nal in Emerald n D,ensity.3.54 �, •� . � _ 1. w.,�+ I ; y?1 ^; xa tip T1 '3 '. I•rII "'^`,. 11 14 1 - n � PUD Zonig: .. Ili; Orange Blossom DR N . .. P•U=� t. .- . I A PD RPUD _ • - ' Its Is. _U 7 o 100 200 400 soo N GROSS DENSITY UNITS PER ACRE (UPA) Feet FOR BUCKLEY MPUD AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Collier Countti lSmappingBeth YangAIP Growth Management Department Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Collier County Planning Commission NIM SYNOPSIS WALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS ss,713 s n Memorandum To: Eric Johnson From: Alexis Crespo cc: Richard Yovanovich;Michael Hueniken;Patrick Butler Date: October 7,2015 Subject: BuckleyPUDA(PL2015-1084) NEVI Synopsis Pulte Home Corporation; Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Collier County Staff conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting(NIM) on Wednesday, October 7,2015.The meeting was held at 6:00 p.m. at the Collier County Headquarters Library at 2385 Orange Blossom Drive. The sign-in sheets are attached as Exhibit "A", and demonstrate approximately 19 residents were in attendance, not including the consultant team. Handouts were distributed outlining the project overview,proposed uses,and development regulations, and are attached as Exhibit`B". Alexis Crespo (project planner) conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team, and an overview of the proposed PUD Amendment application. She also outlined the project location and existing PUD approval. Mrs. Crespo explained the project history, noting the current entitlements on the property allow for 239 multi-family dwelling units as well as 162,750 square feet commercial uses. She then explained Pulte's proposal to add single-family detached and two-family attached dwelling types to the allowable uses of the PUD to allow for the option of developing the site as a residential community. They do not intend to develop the site with any of the commercial uses currently approved. She explained the proposed PUD Master Plan and noted the single-point of access and that the developer will be paying their fair share of the Airport and Orange Blossom intersection improvements when required. She also noted the proposed design will maintain the stormwater lake on the west side of the property to provide separation and compatibility with the Emerald Lakes PUD to the west. She also noted the amendment will not impact the 20' Type"C"buffer along the western property line and it includes the six-foot tall wall. She also explained that the single-family development option will result in removal of the 100- foot setback to the west that is on the approved plan. Mike Hueniken noted the 100 foot setback will only be removed if they elect to do the single-family option. Traffic counts were mentioned as being reduced approximately 60% with the single-family uses development option when compared to the mixed-use entitlements. Page 1 of 3 Mrs. Crespo also outlined the public input opportunities throughout the process, and noted the PUD Amendment application hearing before the Collier County Planning Commission would be scheduled sometime in the December 2015 or January 2016. Following the Consultant's presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the Agent questions regarding the proposed development. The following is a summarized list of the questions asked and responses given. Question/Comment 1: How big is the lake going to be across the back?How wide? Response: It is 100-feet wide with 40-foot lake maintenance easement. The total size is 3.2 acres. Question/Comment 2: One entrance in and out? Is that enough?? Response: Yes,only one access is proposed. We are proposing to provide a pedestrian connection to the library,which they may want to walk to and not get onto the Airport Road sidewalk. Question/Comment 3: Is there a sidewalk on Airport Road?That sidewalk is going to stay?And you're just going to have an entrance or walkway to the library? Response: Yes, the sidewalk on Airport Pulling Road will remain. Yes,we are intending to provide a pedestrian interconnection to the library.This this will be a gated community, so the pedestrian connection to the library will have some type of key fob to allow residents to get in to the library. Question/Comment 4: So this will eliminate all of the commercial? Response: Yes, this option will allow for a residential-only development program. Pulte does residential home-building. However, the rest of the approved uses will still remain as Pulte has not purchased the property yet. Question/Comment 5: If Pulte gets the approval from the County,it will single-family homes or multi-dwellings for the whole 21.7 acres,correct?If they don't get the approval then the property stays the way it is currently zoned? Response: Yes. Pulte intends to develop a single-family community per the Option B Master Plan. If the zoning amendment does not get approved the project will remain a mixed-use development per the existing approval. Question/Comment 6: Did you say this is a gated community?How far from the Airport Road will that gate be? Response: Yes,it will be gated. There's a minimum stacking distance in the LDC to ensure cars can stack up at the entrance and not go onto the Airport Road, I believe its 100 feet. Question/Comment 7: It backs up the traffic sometimes. Response: We have to design it so they won't back up onto the Airport Roadway. Question/Comment 8: They are also proposing a right turn lane in? Response: Correct,a right turn lane will be required,which will provide additional stacking. Question/Comment 9: Can Pulte describe a little bit as to the style of housing and construction materials that they might be using? Response: That's our sales department directing those decisions. Until we get the zoning done we don't go down that path of finalizing products. We have an idea what we want to do with the property. Proposing single-family homes in there, two-story homes as well. You can get an idea of our stuff around town,we built in Verona Walk and currently building in Winding Cypress. You can also visit our website. Page 2 of 3 There were no further questions or comments. The Consultant Team thanked attendees for coming and noted that contact information was provided in the letter should anyone have more questions regarding the project. The meeting concluded at approximately 6:15 p.m. The meeting was recorded per the CD attached as Exhibit"C". Page 3 of 3 s ID z.• K N '1 (1 a M W 0 Its OW * - 3 -* go cn til v., = 2• .0 to 0 = , -■ O 0 VI A. 1-4 -14 1 () v 1, =• .4 u) v■ 4 * Ih0V,. vN, •"....e M Z 0 Cti P >4 z ar Ft 0 0 00n0 O Cr 0 0 CD 1 '1. -s ..., .."P O . 0. rtcll C CO * . , O r■ 5 1 \\A r+ 0 n 'CI 0 0 a. .., cr -, fp on r 0 3 ...i. r..... M 0 ryil 1 - us CL 11 4°P co > cr ' " 0 , CI) (D ,'„ ,, 0 m c O W e 8 * m 3 0 al m * ',.. "A 0 rn = m = 1:1 N, • V . 4... 7 e) 'V ID M 0 s) .... 01 " x „...,,K) c z 'el' OT, 5. es-- — 1Z) —11 1 , , ) rD c 04 .4. 3 — su = i?, $:, -...x k. ... Th. -- --c-s' , = .,2 51 * cl - 2 < ..1 C-n 73 ° Ca -,, AA. cb, s = - a. - 0. - -: i— X „) % DI' 5 1 n Z 0 @ tv t- r . 0) CD > > , .....A. ......1 ../. 0 * . 411 ,k ,.. at., 1/4,, ,.. _,- , c = , 7) —0 C8 r, DI PP 0. l ..... o a-4 0 -1> .Z c o 0 -. F— .—I 0 .. z = c "TI N tD k ..., as • us = ir co rn a ,..„, -13 . v+ as * , A-1 ,.. 0 0 ix m '''Pb• M iS.. C. ..l 401 0 `•C e w. —I "S r\ . 4 c c Tti 0" 0 0. Z a % = -, \ ? .1.- '• m e , li 0"-- '' *" m 0 0 cr*0 -4 'CI 1 " t■'°* k J %- so k. It) ''' 0.> ? el-ft ci 5 ,.. .5 FN, ... OD M 0 'v. N, k %* . , _ 1 op C n , c. ,, , ,Akt a n _, 5), .- 5 f 3 d CD 0' S ;• "4 " �A :11\i.t :4+ ;3 ‘-''s ••'N.) Z 1, �V • DII `I rz \ C CO _ C � p 3 o C OD S* N " r^r �� p O n ,� -z' 9) n C Q� a o ` J 0 0 .fie `` r I V (/ o " -, ,p T pp �`4 0- fD a4 r n /\ N V3 �S J n -� 5 c <' a oj rn 0 r = -� v, 1 m .t „ _ o rQ)-16:--- 0nn� O. mu`� �poCZ = y „, h o a 6 7 9 ^ 01 O immil bar'N '2 3 A Ni K Iv n " fib, * r VJ O D rD n O ki OA -I,t. • � 2. uIi AAlt �. °cootD r O z [Y n iii w` CD „.., ... , p 17.1 eh -7 = til VI• d 0£ -p rn o-0 y f • °) rn pi c- " 1. 111 N C ro fD a ^ d 0 0. 1 k n cn cn i• jj ,, 1 i \.) I:, 1 i , 3-_,,,,p it.' 3 ,,- t•,', .., IA EXHIBIT B BUCKLEY MPUD (PUDA-PL2015-1084) Neighborhood Information Meeting Project Information Sheet Project Size: 21.7+/-acres Native Vegetation/Open Space: No native vegetation exists on-site. Open space will be provided in accordance with the Land Development Code. Future Land Use: Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Proposed Future Land Use: Buckley Mixed-Use District (No Change Proposed) Current Zoning: Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Proposed Zoning: Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (No Change Proposed) Existing Density Uses: Maximum of 239 multi-family dwelling units at 11 du/acre; or 162,750 square feet of retail, office, and services. Proposed Density/Uses: Maximum of 239 multi-family, single-family detached or two-family/duplex dwelling units at 11 du/acre; or 162,750 square feet of retail, office and service uses. EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR BUCKLEY MPUD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TOWNHOUSE MULTI-FAMILY RECREATION SINGLE- TWO- DWELLINGS FACILITIES& FAMILY FAMILY/ MAINTENANCE DETACHED DUPLEX STRUCTURES MINIMUM 3,000 square feet N/A N/A 4,500 s.f. 3,500 s.f. LOT AREA MINIMUM 30 feet N/A N/A 45 feet 35 feet LOT WIDTH MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,200 square feet 1,000 square feet N/A 1,200 s.f. 750 s.f. OF UNITS PUD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS8 MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM AIRPORT- 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet PULLING ROAD) MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM NORTH 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet BOUNDARY& SOUTH BOUNDARY) MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK' 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 25 feet 25 feet (FROM WEST BOUNDARY) LAKES8 0 feet from the 0 feet from the 0 feet from the 0 feet from the 0 feet from LME LME LME LME the LME MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS Front: Principal Structure 20 feet' 20 feet' N/A 20 feet2 20 feet' Accessory Structure 20 feet2 20 feet' 20 feet SPS2 SPS2 Side: Principal Structure 20 feet %2 of the SBH N/A 5 feet 5 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet SPS SPS Rear: Principal Structure 10 feet %of the BH N/A 10 feet3 10 feet3 Page 1 of 2 SINGLE- TWO- TOWNHOUSE MULTI-FAMILY RECREATION FAMILY FAMILY/ DWELLINGS FACILITIES& DETACHED DUPLEX MAINTENANCE STRUCTURES Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 5 feet3 5 feet3 Minimum Distance Between Structures: Principal Structure 10 feet '/2 of the SBH N/A 10 feet 0 or 10 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet 0 feet 10 feet 0 or 10 feet MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned: Principal Structure 3-stories not to 3-stories not to exceed 45 feet exceed 45 feet N/A 35 feet 35 feet Accessory Structure 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet SPS SPS Actual: Principal Structure 50 feet 50 feet N/A 40 feet 40 feet Accessory Structure 32 feet 32 feet 32 feet SPS SPS 1. Dumpsters and dumpster enclosures shall not encroach into the 100 foot setback from the Western MPUD boundary. 2.Garages and carports shall be 10 feet from principal structures if detached.There will be a minimum of a 23 foot setback from the back of a sidewalk to front load garages. The minimum front yard setback for side-loaded and/or recessed garages is 10 feet. For corner lots,only one(1)front yard setback shall be required.The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide a 10'setback. 3. Where a home site is adjacent to a landscape buffer easement or lake maintenance easement and it is a separately platted tract, the principal and accessory structure setback on the platted residential lot may be reduced to 0 feet where it abuts the easement/tract. 4. If the parcel is directly accessed by a public or private road right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right of way line per LDC.Sidewalks shall be located in the right-of-way. 5. If the parcel is directly accessed by a private driveway, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge- of-pavement (if not curbed). This would apply to multi-family development tracts that do not have platted rights-of- way. 6. Multi-family or townhouse buildings within 150' of the west property line shall not have west facing balconies. 7. No building shall exceed three stories in height and 45 feet(actual height) and under building parking is prohibited. 8. No setback is required for fences or walls where the Lake Maintenance Easement(LME) or landscape buffer easement is a separately platted tract,except to provide area of landscaping on the exterior side of the wall,if required. BH= Building Height SBH=Sum of Building Heights LME=Lake Maintenance Easement SPS=Same As Principal Structure Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT B BUCKLEY MPUD (PUDA-PL2015-1084) RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES Residential Uses The maximum number of residential units shall not exceed 239 units. For each acre of land utilized for residential purposes, 7,500 square feet of non-residential square footage will be eliminated from the total square footage allowable identified in the Commercial section of this MPUD. Note: See page 3 for reduction of residential units when commercial square footage is built. If a fractional acreage is built, the corresponding units of commercial shall be reduced and rounded up to the nearest whole number i.e. 0.5=1, .4=0. Residential development will be designed to accommodate a full range of residential dwelling types,compatible recreational facilities, essential services and customary accessory uses. Should the site develop fully as a residential project, no commercial facilities will be constructed. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following primary uses: A. Principal Uses The maximum number of residential units is 239. 1. Townhouse dwellings 2. Multi-family dwellings 3. Single-family detached dwellings 4. Two-family/duplex dwellings 5. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Temporary Uses (per the LDC) 1. Model Units 2. Project information and Sales centers 3. Construction administrative offices for the developer and authorized contractors and consultants, including temporary access ways and parking areas. 4. Sales and administrative offices for the developer, project management or managing development association, including temporary access ways and parking areas. Page 1 of 2 Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this District, including neighborhood community recreational facilities and property management and maintenance structures intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 2. Garages and carports. 3. Administration facilities intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 4. Swimming Pools, Tennis courts and other similar recreational facilities and buildings to serve residents and their guests. S. Guardhouses and Gatehouses. 6. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. Commercial Uses No changes proposed. Page 2 of 2 WALDROP ENGINEERING , --•,'.- --a - CIVIL ENGINEERING&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS AA 4*"," Did.M 3 OA SPONelk 341 September 21, 2015 RE: Buckley Mixed Use Planned Unit Development PUDA-P L2015-1084 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Alexis Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering, P.A and Richard Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich, & Koester, P.A. on behalf of Pulte Home Corporation has filed a formal application to Collier County seeking amendments to an existing Planned Unit Development(PUDA). The petitioner is asking the County to approve this application to add single-family detached and two- family/duplex dwelling types as permitted uses; add development standards for these dwelling types; add Master Concept Plan Option B; and modify the deviations and developer commitments. The project is currently approved for up to 239 multi-family residential units, and a maximum of 162,750 square feet of retail, office and service uses. The property totals 21.7+/- acres and is located % mile north of the intersection of Airport Pulling Road and Orange Blossom Drive in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our development intentions and to give you an opportunity to influence the form of development. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. at the Collier County Library Headquarters at 2385 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples, FL 34109.The meeting will be held in the Sugden Theatre. At this meeting the petitioner will make every effort to illustrate how the property will be developed and to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 405-7777 ext. 207, or alexis.crespo @waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. IF CIA lb .4_ Alexis V. Crespo, AICP Director of Planning *Please note that the Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting for the Buckley Mixed Use Planned Unit Development(PUDA-PL2015-1084) held by Pulte Home Corporation and presented by Richard Yovanovich of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and Alexis Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering, P.A. at the following time and location: Wednesday, October 7th 2015 at 6:00 p.m. Collier County Library Headquarters, Sugden Theatre 2385 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples, FL 34109 The subject property totals 21.7+/- acres and is located 1/4 mile north of the intersection of Airport Pulling Road and Orange Blossom Drive in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The property is immediately east of the Emerald Lakes PUD. The property owner has made an application to Collier County to add single-family detached and two-family/duplex dwelling types as permitted uses; add development standards for these dwelling types; add Master Concept Plan Option B; and modify the deviations and developer commitments. The project is currently approved for up to 239 multi-family residential units, and a maximum of 162,750 square feet of retail, office and service uses. NGRTF4 .`� , t ., ''PROJECT" J ; '� O , , '( ' L 1 v >i. i —1- ` 'Ac ti T s I i \fit I ) PROJECT LOCATION MAP NO SCALE WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners and residents are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners' representatives and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed to: Waldrop Engineering, P.A. c/o Alexis Crespo, AICP 28100 Bonita Grande Dr., Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 (239)405-7777, ext. 207 OR alexis.crespo @waldropengineering.com *Please note that the Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. 1 V lPJJlt/ 11 V 11Vi. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting for the Buckley A: Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (PUDA-PL2015-1084) held by Pulte Home Corporation and presented by Richard Yovanovich of Coleman,Yovanovich&Koester, P.A. and Alexis Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering, P.A. at the following time and WALDROP ENGINEERING, P P.A. location: W.AIALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. 2 810 0 BONITA GRANDE DR STE 3 05 Wednesday,October 7th 2015 at 6:00 p.m. Collier County Library Headquarters, Sugden Theatre BONITA SPRINGS FL 34135 2385 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples, FL 34109 REFERENCE: 5 0 717 6 2 015 The subject property totals 21.7+1-acres and is located%mile north of the intersection 6 9 8 7 3 9 of Airport Pulling Road and Orange Blossom Drive in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida.The property is immediately east of the Emerald Lakes PUD. The property owner has made an application to Collier County to add State of Florida single-family detached and two-family/duplex dwelling types as permitted uses; add Counties of Collier and Lee development standards for these dwelling types; add Master Concept Plan Option Before the undersigned author: B; and modify the deviations and developer commitments. The project is currently appeared Dan McDermott, says th approved for up to 239 multi-family residential units, and a maximum of 162,750 square feet of retail,office and service uses. the Inside Sales Supervisor, of news, a daily newspaper publish MORINY Collier County, Florida: that t advertising was published in sa Pr�o�ecT listed. - LOCATION Affiant further says that the t.. / VANDERBILT AFACiP ROAD News is a newspaper published a ! Collier County, Florida, and th , >f has heretofore been continuous) entered as second class mail ma office in Collier County. Florid "° 1 year next precending the first 4 attached copy of advertisement; any person, firm or corporation • commission or refund fqr the pu this advertisement for publicat .- newspaper. PROJECT LOCATION MAP . ,;,5<<_ AD SPACE:O FILED ON:iU/02/i5 WE VALUE YOUR INPUT PUBLISHED ON: Business and property owners and residents are welcome to attend the presentation September 21, 2015 and discuss the project with the owners' representatives and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed to: Waldrop Engineering, P.A.c/o Alexis Crespo,AICP 28100 Bonita Grande Dr.,Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 (239)405-7777,ext.207 OR aexis.crespocwaldropengineering.com *Please note that the Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. No.698/39 September 21.2015 Signature of Affiant _ ,t -'— -"`--- ' Sworn to and Subscribed before me this day of , �'!t 20 Personally known by me , 17),-NS + ��,.'go� IVONNF DOAI �,foh erg'•. :r, ,,^,,, Nom, ,'.,b11c Sou,nt Florida 0 cn,t:,....stun # Et-900870 /t'v� iii' :.. `...4„-,��`P,,r ExplreSJul lb. 201 1 h,, - -,ph National Notary Assn. NAMES NAME2 NAMES NAME4 NAMES NAMER ABRAHAM,ISAAC MICHAEL A ABRAHAM 2496 ORCHID BAY DR K Y-174 NAPLES,FL 34109-0663 AOREU,JOSE A&NIDIA E 7295 MILL POND CIR NAPLES,FL 34109-1772 ACKERMAN,JAY E&VENITA R 13539 NORTHUMBERLAND OR WELLINGTON,FL 33414•-8969 ADAMS,BRYAN EUGENE MICHELE KUPCHELIA ADAMS 2426 ORCHID BAY DRIVE#F202 NAPLES,FL 34109-0000 ADAMS,JOHN E&REBECCA 7475 JACARANDA PARK RD#104 NAPLES,FL.34109--0661 AGRESTE,RICHARD A&CHRISTINE 2861 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 102 NAPLES,FL 34109-0657 AIRPORT PULLING ORANGE BLOSSOM LIT 560 DELAWARE AVE RM 400- BUFFALO,NY 14202-1204 AIRPORT PULUNG ORANGE BLOSSOM LLC 560 DELAWARE AVE RM 400 BUFFALO,NY 14202-1204 ALFONSO D'AMELIO REV TRUST 7535 MILL POND CIRCLE NAPLES,FL 34109--0000 AUARD,RAYMOND G&ZAUTA 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD#N-203 NAPLES,Ft 34109--7695 ALLEN,JOANNE T 2450 OLD GROVES.RD 4D-201 NAPLES,FL 34.109--7686 A1.01,NICHOLAS2 7694 MILL STREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34109--•1715 ANDERSEN,WILLIAM&MICHELE 42 ASHFORD OR BOHEMIA,NY 11716-3958 ANN OSHAUGHNESSY REV TRUST JOSEPH OSHAUGHNESSY 7455 MILL POND OR NAPLES,FL 34109,-•1708 APPLIN,ROBING&DEBORAH H 2450 OLD GROVES ROAD#203 NAPLES,FL 34101--0000 AUER,WOLFGANG&MADELEINE B TRAUNSTR25 A5026 SALZBURG AUSTRIA A-5026 AVIZINIS,ROBERT A CORINNE 16 KATHLEEN CT- WEST WARWICK,RI 02693-1949 BAKER,BETTY! 2470 OLD GROVES RD APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109--7693 BARBAY,JOHN A&ANN MARIE 12259 NE.BENTON ST NEWPORT,OR 97365--0000 BARRETT,THOMAS ANDREW 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE ROAD 11P-203 NAPLES,FL 34109-0000 BARRY&CAROL F BELT REV TRUST 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD#N-204 NAPLES,FL 34109--0000 BARTER,CHRISTOPHER STEVEN BARTEK 7174 KINGS CROSS ST AVON,IN 46123-0000 BARTLETT,LAWRENCE KAREN M IGNAGNI 310S CHESAPEAKE ST NW WASHINGTON,DC 20008--2230 BATES,BRYAN ANDREW SARAH JEANNINE RATES 7663 MILL STREAM DRIVE NAPLES,FL 34109--0000 BATTAGLIA,RICHARD C PATRICIA A BATTAGLIA 2505 ORCHID BAY DR APT 203 NAPLES,FL 34109-0664 BAUER,CARL.W&PATRICIA 7498 MILL POND CIE NAPLES,FL 34109-•1707 BERG TR,CAROLYN H CAROLYN II BERG TR UST 310 2-14.96 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD A.103N NAPLES,FL 34109-7695 BERGER,LEONARD L 2516 ORCHID BAY DR APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109-0670 BETTY P GALLO IRREV TRUST 292 W 9TH ST DEER PARK,NY 11729.6528 BIRTOLO,JANINA 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 203 NAPLES,FL 34109--06S4 BLADICH,DOUGLAS) 2486 ORCHID BAY OR APT 201 NAPLES,FL 34104---0662 BLAJIAN TR,JEFFREY 0 MARY(BARAN 1RREV TRUST UTO 9/4/02 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 01025 NAPLES,FL 34109-7695 BLOCK,ROBERT L HAROLD E BLOCK 2430 OLD GROVES RD APT 103 NAPLES,FL 34109--0659 BOCK,MARGARET 7435 PLUMSAGOBRIDGE RD 8104 NAPLES,FL 34109-7694 BOONE,JERRY E&SALLIE A 1300 HILL RD MILLVILLE,PA 17846-8651 BOREK,ANIELA M GENEVIEVE M HOMILLER 2541 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109-7610 605514AROT,!AMES P&KAREN N 2507 SAILORS WAY NAPLES,FL.34109-7618 BRANDER,STEVEN&JUDITH 30THIMBLEBERRY LANE SOUTH YARMOUTH,MA 02664---0000 BRAY,GERALD L&MARIAN M 7465 JACARANDA PARK RD#R204 NAPLES,FL 34109-7697 DRENNAN,DIANE I 2503 CITRUS LAKE DR#105 NAPLES,FL 34109-7601 BRIENZA,DOROTHY A DONNELLY 5 SARGEANTSTODDARD CT SEDMINSTER,NJ 07921--0000 RROPHY SR,JOHN M&PATRICIA A 2841 CITRUS LAKE DR APT K104 NAPLES,FL 34109--9119 1 BROSTOFF TR,PEARL K PEARL K BROSTOFFTRUST. UTO 11/26/07 2504 SA1LOR5 WAY NAPLES,FL 34109-0000 BRYANT,LA VERNE H 2861 CITRUS LAKE DR 9201 NAPLES,FL 34109--0657 BR20VSKI REV TRUST 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE ROAD N-202 NAPLES,FL 34109--0000 BUELER,CLAIRE M S 7466 JACARANDA PARK ROAD UNIT 4203 NAPLES,FL 34109---0000 BUJMCKI,FRANCIS S CATHERINE BUJNICKJ PO BOX 483 WADING RIVER,NY.11792-0483 BURKE,JOHN F&DENISE; 2496 ORC1i1D BAY DR APT 102 NAPLES,EL 34109--0663 BURNHAM TO DR WILLIAM I OR WILLIAM J BURNHAM LN TRUST UTD 11/18/08 PO BOX 7 SHAFTSBURY,VT 05262--0000 BUTLER,PATRICIA A 2560.CITRUS LAKE DR APT 202 NAPLES,FL 34104--0656 BUOWSKI,TERESA JAN BZOWSKI 6805 RICHMOND AVE DARIEN,IL 60561-0000 CJ IONCKHEERE REV TRUST 887 FLOWERING PLUM DRIVE BRIGHTON,MI 4R116--0000 CAMPBELL DALE 6&NANCY E 289E 42ND ST DALLAS,PA 18612-8920 CARPANZANO,ANTHONY&IDA 107 EASTCHESTER RD NEW ROCHELLE,NY 10801---1206 CARR,BRIAN&SALLY 2560 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 201 NAPLES,FL 34109.0656 CARROLL,TERRANNCE J&SUSAN CL 78 STEPHANIE LANE GLEN ELLYN,IL 60137-0040 CASALETTO SR,EDWARD C CASALETTO,DOLORES A 7439 MILL POND OR NAPLES,FL 34109-1708 CASEBOLT,DELORES 8 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE R0 It 101 NAPLES,FL 34109---7694 CASTANO,ALBERT F&SHEILALEE 374 SADDLEBROOK IN NAPLES,FL 34110-1368 CA5TAN°,ELIZABETH ANN 6 JONATHAN CT HIGHLAND,NY 12528--0000 CASTLE,CRAIG&LORALEE 2506 SAILORS WAY NAPLES,FL 34109--7620 CHAMPION,!MICHAEL&KATHLEEN 20 SABLE RD SALEM,MA 01970--1038 CHRISTOPHEL,JOHN O&INGRID 0 600 HARBOR BLVD UNIT 1028 WEEHAWKEN,NJ 07086--6750 CHRZANOWSKI,STANLEY PETER NORAH FRANCESCHRZANOWSKI 2504 SAILORS WAY NAPLES,FL.34109•--7620 CIOROGAR,GHEORGHE&RODICA 7506 MILL POND CIR NAPLES,FL.34109--1711 CLARK FAMILY IT REV TRUST 7466 JACARANDA PARK RD#102 NAPLES,FL 34109--7696 CLARK,URSULA K 5670 SHADY OAKS IN NAPLES,FL 3411D-1254 CO LETTL ANITA M 2834 COACH HOUSE WAY NAPLES,FL 34105--0000 COWER MY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMITRE,STE 101 NAPLES,FL.34112---0000 COLLIERCNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335TAMIAMI TR E,STE 101 NAPLES,EL 34112--0000 CONLEY TR,PAULA V PAULA V CONLEY TR UST LIED 9.991. 2440 OLD GROVES RD APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109-7682 CONNOR,JOHN BARBARA BERRICKSON-CONNOR 5716 GLENEAGLES DR PIANO,TX 75099-5975 CORRIGAN,LAURENCE 111 ELEANOR 7425 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 9104 NAPLES,FL 34109--7699 COSTANTINOU EST,CHARLES 2456 ORCHID BAY OR#1.202. NAPLES,FL 34109-7685 COIL MICHAEL&LOIIE 8173 VALIANT DR NAPLES,FL-34104-6671 CUMMINGS,THOMASI PATRICIA A CUMMINGS 67 MAYFLOWER DR SEEKONK,MA 02771-3409 CURRY,ERIN K KENT CURRY 10846 CYPRESS GLEN DO CORAL SPRINGS,FL 33071--8164 CUTLER,KAREN R 2519 SAILORS WAY NAPLES,FL 34109--7618 CZARNECKI,GEORGE)&HELENA 2446 ORCHID BAY DR APT 201 NAPLES,FL 34109-7684 CZYSCZON,CHARLOTTE 2440 OLD GROVES RD#C201 NAPLES,FL 34109-7682 DALY,KEVIN E&GULIANA CIARLO 32 LARKSPUR CRESCENT ANCalTER,ON CANADA L9K 103 DAROSA,NELSON H&LUCIA 7582 MILL STREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34109-1719 DAURIA,ANTHONY BARBARA CONNIE OAURIA 33 RING LANE LEVITTOWN,NY 11756-0000 DAVID,JOHN M&JANE E 2780 TIBURON BLVD E#101 NAPLES,FL 34109--0000 DAVIS,JEPJE F UNDA I WARNS DAVIS 6245 SUNBURY RD WESTERVIUE,OH 43082--8656 DAVIT,LAMES F&CHRISTINE F 585 WESTERN AVENUE GLEN ELLYN,IL 60137--0560 DE LONG,PHILIP F&SHIRLEY A 7856 NASSAU LOOP DURUM,OH 43017-8581 DEFRANCESCO,NICOL€ND. CARMEIA DEFRANCESCO 26 NAOIACRES RR 1 TINY,ON CANADA 101210 DEKKERTR,JAMES C REVOCABLE TRUST 7431 MILL POND CIR NAPLES,FL 34109--1708 DEKKER,JACKIE 1&EDWARD 74SS JACARANDA PARK RD APT 104 NAPLES,FL 34109--0630 DILL,DONALD l 7678 MILL STREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34104-1715 0114&10,STANISLAO MARIA S PMALO. JOSEPHINE HOWLAND 2526 ORCHID BAY DR UNIT 66202 NAPLES,FL 34109-8611 OINNOCENZO,DARYL 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD 0102 NAPLES,FE 34109--0630 °IRESTA,PETERJ&SANDRA 7CANDLEVIEW DR SHERMAN,CT 06784•--0000 DISQUE CO-TR,EDWARD) DISQUE CO-TR,CATHERINE R UTO 5723/90 37521STAVE S NAPLES,FL 34102-7E413 DISQUE TR,EDWARD 1 DISQUE TR,CATHERINE R EDWARD I DISQUE REV/TR 5/23/90 375 21ST AVE S NAPLES,FL 34102-7603 D08RUTSKY TR,ANN E ANN E DOBRUTSKY TR UST 1JT06-28-93 2456 ORCHID BAY DR APT 104 NAPLES,FL 34109--7685 DUBINS,MORTIMER I&..BARBARA M 9 LAKEWOOD CT RIDGELEY,WV 26753---9727 DURKIN SR,JOHN A&PATRICIA PATRICKI&KRISTA R DURKIN LOIS DURKIN 101 SPRUCE ST MORRIS,IL 601450--2329 i OURRENBERGER,DAVID 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 8204 NAPLES,FL 34109---7694 EARLY,LEAH SELBY 7407 MILL POND CIR. NAPLES,FL 34109-1708 ELIAS,BRUCE&LYNN 2017 PARASOL DR LEXINGTON,KY 40513-1072 EMERALD LAKES RES ASSOC INC %AMERICAN PROPERTY MNGT 10621 AIRPORT PULLING RD N#8 NAPLES.FL 34109-7300 EMERALD LAKES RES ASSOC INC %AMERICAN PROPERTY MNGT 10621 AIRPORT PULLING RD N#8 NAPLES,FL 34109-7300 EMERALD LAKES RES ASSOC INC %AMERICAN PROPERTY MNGT 10621 AIRPORT PULLING RD N#8 NAPLES,FL 34109--7300 EMERALD LAKES RES ASSOC INC %AMERICAN PROPERTY MNGT 10621 AIRPORT PULLING RD N#8 NAPLES,FL 34109--7300 ETYMONS TR,FRANCIS A UTO 11/20/90 PATRICIA A EMMONS TR UTD 8/20/98 43 DARLINGTON DR HAWTHORN WOODS,IL 60047---9236 ENGER IT REVOCABLE TRUST 2456 ORCHID BAY DR APT 101 NAPLES,ft 34109---7685 ENGLER,KENNETH P&VIRGINIA M 2318 MILL STREAM CT NAPLES,FL 34104--1713 ENTER,ANA MARIA 2506 ORCHID BAY DR APT 104 NAPLES,Fl.34209--0664 ERICKSON,KENNETH P VALERIE ERICKSON 261-30 HILLSIDE AVE FLORAL PARK,NY 11004--0000 EWING TR,ANNE ANN DEWING REV TRUST UTD 04/13/00 2511 CITRUS LAKE DR NAPLES,FL 341D9.-7601 FASOUNO,GERARD C&ANGELA 2476 ORCHID BAY DR APT 203 NAPLES,FL 34101-0629 FAY,PATRICIA E 4 MAPLE CIRCLE RANDOLPH,MA 02368-0000 FIFTH THIRD BANK CORPORATE FACILITIES 1701 GOLF RD MD GRLMBE ROLLING MEADOWS,IL 60008--0000 FISCH,SAMUEL A&ROMANA A 7319 MILL POND CIR NAPLES,FL 34109--1734 FITAPELLI,FRANK P&ETHEL A 2430 OLD GROVES RD APT 201 NAPLES,FL 34103--0659. FITZPATRICK,MARIA BECKA 7434 LANTANA OR NAPLES,FL 34119--0000 FLEISHOUR,BRUCE A&UNNEA C 2541 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 104 NAPLES,FL 34109-7610 FONG,RUTINO R&LUCIA I 7391 MILL POND CIR NAPLES,FL 34109-1734 FOUNTAIN PARE OFFICE BLDG LLC 1613 CHINABERRY WAY NAPLES,FL 34105---3052 I FOUNTAIN PARK RETAIL CENTRE II L L C 1613 CHINABERRY WAY. NAPLES,FL 34105-3052 FOUNTAIN PARK RETAILCTRLLC 1613 CHINABERRY WAY NAPLES,FL 34105-3052 FRINO,MARIE BRENDA F CONNEELY MICHAEL0 FRINO 2503 SAILORS WAY NAPLES,FL 14109-7618 FURLONG,BARBARA MONICA NWURSTLE 2450 OW GROVES RD APT 102 NAPLES,FL 34109--7686 FUSCHILLO,BRIAN 10 WOODED LEI HAMPTON BAYS,NY 11946--1123 GAADT,TIMOTHY C CHERYL L.PATTON 2571 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 202 NAPLES,Ft 34109-7608 GAMBOA,JEANETTE 1&VICTOR M 2446 ORCHID BAY DR#H-204 NAPLES,FL 34109-7634 GAMBOA,VICTOR MANUAL 1EANETTEJ GAMBOA 2446 ORCHID BAY DR APT 204 NAPLES,FL 34109-7684 GARFIELD,DAVID 7630 MILL STREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34109---1715 GARRETT,BARBARA T 7465 JACARANDA PARK RD#201 NAPLES,FL 34109--7697 GASKILE.ROY&CAROL 39 RIVIERA PKWY LINDENHURST,NY 11757--6114 GEORGE FULTON REV LA/TRUST 2505 WILDWOOD AVE NE CANTON,OH 44714-1870. GOLDBERG,NORM 2353 MILL STREAM CT NAPLES,FL 34109-1713 GONZALEZ,PAMELA D 2811.CITRUS LAKE DRAFT 204 NAPLES,FL 34109---7649 GORRA,HELEN 7425 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD#203 NAPLES,FL.34109.-7699 GRACILLA,LUDIVINAV 2505 SAILORS WAY NAPLES,FL.34109---7618 GROVES RESIDENTS ASSOC INTTHE 2480 OLD GROVES RD NAPLES,Fl 34109-7669 GUARDIAN PROPERTY MGMT 6704 LONE OAK BLVD NAPLES,FL 54109-0000. GLRIC,HAMO&VEZA 7471.MILL POND CIR NAPLES,FL 34109--0000 HAINES,PATRICIA A 2446 ORCHID RAY DR#102 NAPLES,Ft 34108--0000 HANSON,MAURICE R&ELIZABETH 105 W SPEARFISH IN JUPITER,FL 33477_-0006 HCP PC1 NAPLES FL LLC PO BOX 847 CARLSBAD,CA 32018--0847 HEALY,MICHAEL 0 2501 SAILORS WAY 0127 NAPLES,FL 34109--.0100 HEALY,PHYLLIS B 7465 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109---7697 HEIKKINEN,KATJA 2420 OLD GROVES RD 8202 NAPLES,FL 34109---0100 HEIRSHBERG,AARON&THERESA 2242 NEWEUISTCOURT CAMARILLO,CA 93010---9000 HELLER,WAYNE C MARK WIOLOSKI 10534 IRON HORSE LANE CARMEL,IN 46032---0000 HENNEL,EDGAR K&NANCY E KIYA N STONETELUNG 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD#102 NAPLES,FL 34109--0626 HERRERA,WILLIAM FLOREZ SABRINA DIETER FLOREZ 7383 MILL POND OR 924% NAPLES,FL 34109--0000 HIGGINS,PATRICIA 2285 MILL STREAM CT NAPLES,FL 34109-1713 HOFFMAN,ROBERT &BROOKE C 7666 MILL STREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34109-1715 11OHZORN,CONSTANZE PO BOX 2282. PORTE VEDRA,FL 32004---2282 HOMILLER,GENEVIEVE M 2611 CITRUS LAKE OR APT 20$ NAPLES,FL 34109-7609 HORVATH,STEVE&DELPHINE A 7426 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 6104 NAPLES,FL 34109••-0627 HUDOLESTUN,MAX R PATRICIA ANN HUDDLESTUN 2368 FOUR SEASONS CT CROWN POINT,IN 46307-4341. HUOT,JEAN-MARIE. 533 COURCHESNE QUEBEC,OC CANADA 011(302 HURST,KATHERINE BLACKFORD 26645 FORREST GREEN DR DECATUR,IL 62521--5411 HUSSEY,RUTH B 2114 N OAK LEE STATE COLLEGE,PA 16803-1124 FRISSON,BETTY B 7511 MILL POND CUL NAPLES,FL 34109-1702 IBARRA,EILEEN C 1451 UTTLE WHAIENECE ROAD MERRICK,NY 11566-4637. INGMIRE,TOMMY 2541 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 106 NAPLES,FL.34109--7610 JAQUESS,TINA 64 2781 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 303 NAPLES,FL 34109-7634 JAYARAMAN,BRANI R JEYANTHI ETHIRAJAN 7335 MILL POND CIRCLE NAPLES,FL 34109•--0000 MITE,JOSEPH E KATHLEEN A HORAN 7466 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 202 NAPLES,FL 34109--7696. JKLM REVOCABLE UV TRUST 444 WEST ST JAMES PLACE#BID CHICAGO,IL 60614--0000 JOAN 1 WALSH REV TRUST 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 203 NAPLES,FL 34109---0630 JOHN R MOORE REVOCABLE TRUST 3616 DE PAUW Pl COLLEGE PARK,MD 20740--4032 1011 NEON TR,LAMES R NIKKI LIOHNSON TR RUBY M JOHNSON TRUST EST 9169 THE LEE NAPLES,FL 34109--1562. JOHNSON TR,WILLIAM 14 11)641.91 3817 PALMER RD W LAKE GENEVA,WI 531477-0000 JOHNSON,CHOYCE&CHERYL 89 HAMILTON AVE WATERTOWN,CT 06795--2402 JOHNSTON,SAMUEL F CHARLESETTE W JOHNSTON 7475 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 201 NAPLES,FL 34109---0661 JONES,BRIAN MEREDITH ELIZABETH A JONES 27 BRACKEN AVENUE TORONTO,ON CANADA MAE 1N4 MIS SR,MATTHEW A&DOREEN M 2436 ORCHID BAY DR APT 202 NAPLES,FL 34109---0658 KACZMARSKI,ALEXANDER 2426 ORCHID BAY DR APT 204 NAPLES,FL.34109--7683 KAPLAN,MURRAY L&EDITH F 27 W SPILT ROCK DR CHERRY HILL.NI 08003-1339 KATHERINE CARR WOOD TRUST 2511 SAILORS WAY NAPLES,FL 34109-7618 KENNETH F DURANT REV UV TRUST 29 STEPHEN RENEGE DRIVE 5 WEYMOUTH,MA 02190-0000 KILTZ,SHARON L 13815 MILL STREAM CT CARMEL,IN 46032-9141 KIRKPATRICK,KARAN L 7311 MILL POND OR NAPLES,FL 34109--1734 KLUCKA,DIANE M 1690 THISTLE DR CANTON,MI 48188-3086 KLUG,KAREN R 3841 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 203 NAPLES,FL 34109-.7656 KMENT,LUBICA 2571 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 203 NAPLES,FL 34109-7668 KOESTNER,HARALO AHORNWEG 9 RODENBACH I GERMANY 63517 KOHLRIESEIE,JOHN O SHELLEY 8 WEINSTEIN 7420 OLD GROVES ED#204 NAPLES,FL 34109-7681 KOURANY TR,OSCAR LID 4-6-94 4824 AUSTIN TRCE ZIONSVILLE,IN 46077--.0670 KOWALCZYK,BONNIE 7359 MILL POND OR NAPLES,FL 34109-1734 KRAYCIK,JAMES P LORI M KRAYCIK 7646 MILL STREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34109.1715 KRUCKMEYER,TRICIA L BIEN,JOEY M 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD#P204 NAPLES,FL 34109-0626 KUBIAK,WALTER M A PAMELA A 520 MERWYN RD NARBER H,PA 19072--2317 LABARBERA,ALBERT 7425 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 4103 NAPLES,FL 34109--7699 LACEY,ROBERT 1630 R ST NW APT 3 WASHINGTON,DC.2069--6472 LAKESIDE OF NAPLES RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC 7600 AIRPORT PULLING RD N NAPLES,FL 34109--1721 LAKESIDE OF NAPLES RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC 7600 AIRPORT PULLING RD N NAPLES,FL 34109--1721 LAKESIDE OF NAPLES RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC 7600 AIRPORT PULLING RD N NAPLES,FL 34109-1721 LAKESIDE OF NAPLES RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC %ADVANCED PROP MUMT SER INC 1035 COLDER CENTER WAY STE 7 NAPLES,FL 34119--8474 LAKESIDE OF NAPLES RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC 7600 AIRPORT PULLING RON NAPLES,FL 34109-1721 LAKESIDE OF NAPLES VILLAS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC INC 7600 AIRPORT PUWNG RDN NAPLES,FL 34109---1721 LANGEN,LESUE&LYNN 11912.I10UGLYNN DR MINNETONKA,MN 55343--4316 IANGNER,AUEJA NEGINSKY,EWA SWIATKOW5KA-FREUND,MALGOR2ATA 7415 MILL POND CIS NAPLES,FL 34109-•0000 LARSEN,LAURA A 7415 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD#101 NAPLES,FL 34109-7698 LATESSA,ANTHONY A&LYNDAJ 2550 CITRUS LAKE OR APT 201 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 6 55 LAWSON,GARY R 444 W ST JAMES PL 0810 CHICAGO,IL 60614-0000 LAWSON,GRACED 2496 ORCHID BAY DRAFT 103 NAPLES,FL 34109---0663 LEITH,LINDA K 2486 ORCHID BAY DRAFT 104 NAPLES,FL 34109--0661 LEMOFF TR,SHARON R LFMOFF FAMILY TRUST 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD 9103 NAPLES,FL 34109--0654 LENNEY,WILLIAM R&NANCY M 2456 ORCHID BAY DR APT 204 NAPLES,FL 34109--7685 LIESER,LEE 2861 CITRUS LAKE DRIVEL-103 NAPLES,FL 34109-0000 LIGHT,SARAH E&GERALD A 2611 CITRUS LAKE OR APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109-7609 UND,THOMAS P&LAURIE A 7550 MILLSTREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34109--1719 LINDA)JACK LIVING TRUST 2456 ORCHID RAY DRIVE NAPLES,FL 34109-7685 LINDENBAUM,SHIRLEY L 2781 CITRUS LAKE DRAPT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109-7634 LISETTE 5YMONDS REV TRUST EST 2456 ORCHID BAY DR APT 1-201 NAPLES,FL 34109-7686 LITTLE,UNCOILS M VIOLETTA I PAWLOWSKA 11741 W GRANDVIEW OR COLUMBUS,IN 47201-5000 LLEWELLYN,MELODY A 7351 MILL POND CIA NAPLES,FL 34109-1734 LOTTI,EVELYN A 7436 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 8104 NAPLES,FL 34109--0000 1012 TR,EUZABETH M UTD 12.1-99 E M LOTZ REVISORY 2470 OLD GROVES RD APT 103 NAPLES,FL.34109-7693 LOUISE 5 WARD TRUST 74661ACARANDA Pi(RI)#201 NAPLES,FL 34109-7696 LOYALLD,JOSEPH W 12 ADAMS ST OLD BRIDGE,NJ 08857--2112 LUX,MARILYN A 7375 MILL POND CAR. NAPLES,FL 34109-1734 MACDONALD,IAN R&JANETA 132 BOBBY LOCKE LANE STOUFFVILLE,ON CANADA 1441R5 MAHER,MICHAEL P&PAMELA E 2506 ORCHID BAY DR APT 202 NAPLES,FL 14109--0664 MAMMARO,ANNUNZIATA 2526 ORCHID BAY DRIVE 0103 NAPLES,FL 34109-0000 MARTIN,ANGEUKA 7556 MILL STREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34109-1719 MARTIN,JOSEPH M&LINDA L 125 HOMERS DOCK RD YARMOUTH PORT,MA 02 67 5--1011 MASER HAROLD&EILEEN 52 MOORLINCH BLVD MEDFORD,NI 08055-4014 MASTROGIUSEPPE,JOHN NANCYMASTBOGTUSEPPE 4CROWUNG CRT RICHMOND HILL,ON CANADA L4E3Y6 MATHENY REV TRUST 2470 OLD GROVES AD#1104 NAPLES,Ft.34109-7693 MAllA,JANE 2109 CITRUS LAKE OR 1 102 NAPLES,FL 34109--7601 MC CARTHY,EDWARD D at WINIFRED 7415 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD#201 NAPLES,FL 34109•--7698 MC MULLEN IR,FRANK EL KATHRYN E MC MULLEN 7598 MILL STREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34109--1719 MCBRIDE TRUST 8520 MANSION BLVD MENTOR,OH 44060--4145 MCDONOUGH,CAROL I&.TAMES 2446 ORCHID BAY DR APT 202 NAPLES,FL 34109--7684 MCFEELEY,PATRICIA 7466 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 104 NAPLES,FL 34109-7696 MCGLYNCHEY TR,MICHAEL DENISE A CLARKSON TR M P MCGLYNCHEY TRUST 1/12/05 I)A CL.ARKSON REV LIV TRUST 11293 FELLOWS HILL DR PLYMOUTH,MI 48170.6358 MCGUIRE,MICHAEL)8t JENNIFER 56 YOUNG AVE CEDAR GROVE,NJ 07009-1432 MCHUGH 1R,DAVID M&SHERI L 7647 MILL STREAM DR NAPES,FL 3 4109-2700 MCINERNEYTR,JOANNE M JOANNE M MCIN£RNERY REV TRUST UTD 03/25/94 2426 ORCHID BAY OR APT 103F. NAPLES,FL 34109-7683 MCNARY,JAMES K&MARY 8 69360 FAIR OAKS LANE COVINGTONOMA,LA 70434-0000 MCQUISTON,DONNA J 7460 JACARANDA PARK RDA 8202 NAPLES,FL 34109-7697 MEASE,RODNEY F 7679 MILL STREAM OR NAPLES,FL 34109-1700 MENARD,G1ORYA 2476 ORCHID BAY OR 11104 NAPLES,FL 34109--W00 MEZZAPEUA TR,HENRIETTA HENRIETTA MEZEAPELLA TR UST UTD 5-10-84 7451 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109-0630 MICHELE ANN LUCAS REV TRUST 2611 CITRUS LAKE DR APT C104 NAPLES,FL 34109-•-9135 MIKLOS,BALAZS ULIANA MIKLOS MCDONALD 353 ELLIS PARK ROAD TORONTO,ON CANADA LAS 25(7 MILLER,DOROTHY L 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD#201. NAPLES,FL 34109•-0E54 MILLER,RAYMOND W&DIANNE M 325 VAN BUREN ST SOUTH HAVEN,MI 49090--0000 MITCHELL,ROBERTA F 2436 ORCHID BAY.DR APT 104 NAPLES,FL 34109-•-0658 MITTI,MARIE E 2476 ORCHID RAY OR APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109•-0629 MORELU,ANGELA 3367 STRATFORD RD WANTAGH,NY 11793--3012 MOUNTFORO JR WILLIAM E 7475 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 202 NAPLES,FL 34109---0661 MOUNTFORD,EILEEN L 7466 JACARANDA PARK RD#U-204 NAPLES,FL 34199.7696 MUGGLETON,CHRISTOPHER 14 HAMMOND LODGE ADMIRAL WALK LONDON UNITED KINGDOM W93TG MULLIGAN,DOROTHY A 7426 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD#103 NAPLES,FL-34109-0627 MUNRO,DOUGLAS R&VERA L 147 VERO BEACH BVLVD TORONTO,ON CANADA MOM 1R2 MLISTAFA,PEMBE I KEUBAN GURKAS MINES OCONNOR MEHMET MUSTAFA 6 WESTVALEIN HUNTINGTON,NY 11743-6618 MYERS,MEUTTA M 7327 MILL POND COL NAPLES,FL 34109-1734 NADOTTI,DIANA.M 7415 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 8203 NAPLES,FL 34109---0000 NAPLES ITALIAN-AMERICAN CLUB FOUNDATION INC. 7035-7037 AIRPORT RDN NAPLES,FL 34109-1709 NELLER,JOHN D&CATHY 73WINDTREEE TORRINGTON,CT 06790---3054 NEIZER,CAROL M 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD 05-201 NAPLES,FL 34109---0630 NEVOLA,MIROSLAV EDIT TOTH 12 PARK IANE 'TORONTO ON CANADA MN 1R6 NUZZOLESE,JOSEPH PO BOX 156 EAST MEADOW,NV 11554--6156 NU2ZOLESE,JOSEPH PO BOX 136 EAST MEADOW,NY 11554--0156 NYE,DENNIS B 16 PLATT ST#2 NORWALK,CT 0685S-0000 OGILVIE,JACLYN 467 GARDEN VALLEY DRIVE YOUNGSTOWN,OH 44512--•0000 OLSON,PHILIP G&MAUREEN A 7522 MILL POND CIR NAPLES,FL 34109--sin OSULLIVAN,CATHLEEN C 226 COMMONWEALTH AVE. CHESTNUT HILL,MA 02467-1142 OZAKI,HITOMI 2440 OLD GROVES RD It C104 NAPLES,FL 34109-7682 PACK,KENNETH B BARBARA ELIZABETH PACK 6075 RIVER DR LORTON,VA 23079--4176 PAGANO,LUIGI0 JENNIFER-LD'ALLESSANDRO 7476 JACARANDA PARK RD 0201 NAPLES,FL 34109•-0000 PALKA ET AL CATHERINE 13236.SWESNIEW DR PALMS HEIGHTS,IL 60463--2759 PANNULLO,FREDERICK&ANNA MAE 2486 ORCHID BAY DR AFT 102 NAMES,FL 34109.-0662 PARADISO LAND TRUST 10 BENOIT KIRKIAN° KIRKLAND,0.0 CANADA H9H SH7 PARRIS,JUDITH A 3729 KENT DR NAPLES,FL 34112.3741 PARRISH,GARRY M 7710 MILL STREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34109---1715 PARSONS FAMILY REV TRUST 2476 ORCHID BAY DR APT 202 NAPLES,FL.34109--06 2 9 PASTERNAK,DONALD 8 RI TA 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD LE 103 NAPLES,FL 34109-7694 PATHWAYS ACCEPTANCE CO LLC 2365 ELM ST MANCHESTER,NH 03104--3207 PATTEN,SUSAN 0 2460 OLD GROVES RD APT 104 NAPLES,FL 34109-0660 PAVLICK,GAIL 0 10 CHERRY STREET NEWPORT,RI 02840-4W00 PEARCE,JOANN 100 FALCONHURST DR N PITTSBURGH,PA 1523B--2652 PEREIRA,ERNEST&CINDY S 2811 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 201 NAPLES,FL 34109-7649 PERHAVEC,JAMES C 3619 PARK EAST DR STE 112 BEACHWOOD,OH 44122-4312. PERILED,GERALD 1630 RAVEN WOOD AVENUE PETERBOROUGH,ON CANADA I(911 2P11 PERLEWTT2 JAMES D&JANICE A 7117 N 915T ST MILWAUKEE,WI 53224---4716. PETERSEN,DARLENE E 7476 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 102 NAPLES,FL 34109--0653 PETERSEN,FLORENCE KATHRYNEG PETERSEN 2506 ORCHID BAY OR APT 102 NAPLES,FL 34109--0 06 4 PETITTI,ANTONIO&MARIE 34 W ESTFIELO DR TRUM BULL,CF 06611-1532 PHILLIPS,MIKE&GEORGINA 701-135.ANTIBES DR NORTH YORK,ON CANADA M2R221 PIDGEON,EARL 1&KATHERINE E 2530 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109--76811 PINTO,MARC05 ELAINE BRAGA-PINTO 7614 MILL STREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34109-1715 PIROCH,PHYLLIS E JANET MCCANN CAROL NARGI 2911 CITRUS LAKE ORAPT 3104 NAPLES,FL 3410&-9121 PISCATELLI,LE01&NORINE C 21 PEBBLE BEACH AVE: MASHPEE,MA 02649-2885. PIWKO TR,KENNETH P MARY MARGARET PIWKO TR 7831W GREENLEAF ST NIBS,IL 60714-1914 POGGE,BRENDA 2426 ORCHID BAY DR#F104 NAPLES,FL 34109--0000 POHOUSKY,JOYCE 2516 ORCHID BAY DR APT 103 NAPLES,FL 34109--0670 POISTON TR ANTHONY D COLLEEN C POLSTON TR ROLSTON FAMILY TRUST UTD 12/13/04 2530 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 102. NAPLES,FL 34109-7680 PORTATR,MARY ELLEN MARY ELLEN PORTA TRUST UTD 1/23/07 2515 SAILORS WAY NAPLES,FL 34109-7618 POWERS TR,DOLORES M DM POWERS TRUST UT07/17/07 649 61ST ST DOWNERS GROVE,IL 6051&-1938 PRIOLO,SNATINA 7455 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 204 NAPLES,FL 34109-0630 PRIORY,JOSEPH 0 NANCY A KRAWCZYK-PRIMLY 17 WENDOVER RD YARDLEY,PA 19067---1993 PROVES,MARK PATRICIA MENZIES TR&PR 6371 RIVERDALE HAMBURG,MI 48139--0000 PROVANCE,JEANETTE 7530 MILL POND CIR NAPLES,FL 34109-1711 PULLING IR TR,JOHN A JOHN A PULLING TRUST MARSHA FORD PULLING TR LUCY G FINCH 6500 AIRPORT PULLING RD N NAPLES,FL 34109.-2020 RAAB,GARY F 7695 MILL STREAM DR NAPLES,FL 34109-1700. RADTKE,JAMES 2560 CITRUS LAKE.DR APT V101 NAPLES,FL 34109-9103 RAGONE,PAUL)&DAWN F 2426 ORCHID BAY DR 8 F-201 NAPLES,FL 34109-7683 RAGUSA,GAETANO&ROSALIA 115 SARANAC AVE BUFFALO,NY 14216.2444. RAIN,SUSAN A 2506 ORCHID BAY DR AFT 103 NAPLES,FL 34109--0664 RANKIN,JOHN 0&HEATHER C/O MALCA MCLEAN 81 WINDERMERE BLVD BATH,ON CANADA VON 150 REDMOND,WILLIAM&BERYL 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD 11104 NAPLES,FL 34109-0000 REFERENCE ONLY FOUNTAIN PARK ACOMMERCIAL.CONDOMIMIUM REFERENCE ONLY LAKESIDE CARRIAGE HOMES CONDO(PH VIII] REFERENCE ONLY LAKESIDE CARRIAGE HOMES A CONDOMINIUM REFERENCE ONLY PIPER'S GROVE ACONDOMINIUM REID,PHILIP R&JEANNE 5 24 LAS BRISAS WAY NAPLES,FL 34108--8292 REINHOFER,JOSEPH&ROSE 1843 TORREY PKWY LIBERTYVILLE,I1 60048--0000 REZIN.BRUCE 2611 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 206 NAPLES,FL 34109--7609 RICHARD,NORMAND I&ELAINE L 2486 ORCHID BAY DR R202 NAPLES,Ft 34109--0662 RICHARD,SCOTT O&JUDITH E 2460 OLD GROVES RD APT 204 NAPLES,FL 341D9---0660 616610,JUNE 1 CHRISTINE T MCGOLDRICK 7435 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 81(203 NAPLES,FL 34109--7594 RINALJN,DONATO&MARIA 34 CEDAR AVE WATERBURY,CT 06705-2701 RITA C O'BRIEN TRUST 2302 SAILORS.WAY NAPLES,FL 34109-7620 RITTER,RONALD ANN RITTER 201 E 66TH ST 0 1714 NEW YORK,NY 10065-0000 ROBERTS,DONNA THOMAS ANDREA 5R 7503 MILL POND CIR NAPLES,FL.34109-1702 ROESNER,LARRY L&LOIS 1 1830 COBBLESTONE LN OXFORD,MI 48371-3702 ROLFE,JAMES N&AUGUSTA M 6517 COLE RD BYRON,NM 14422--9756 ROONEY,KENNETH W&PATRICIA A 3158 SANDOVAL DR LAKE ORION,MI 48350-1547 ROSE M PECKHAM FAMILY TRUST 31I MOOSE HILL ROAD EAST WALPOLE,MA 02032--0000 R05ENDAHL,1 FRED 6100 WINTHROP DR RALEIGH,NC 27912-2144 ROY,BRUCE DAVID ROY 2572 CITRUS LAKE.DR 9201 NAPLES,FL 34109-0000 ROY,BRUCE&MARGARET 3890 MIDSHORE DR NAPLES,FL 34109--0785 ROYCE,DANIEL&OKANA 7405 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 203 NAPLES,FL 34109-7697 S M VAN VONOEREN REV TRUST 8915 WINDSOR TERR BROOKLYN PARK,MN 55443--0000 SALGAT JR,HERBERT A KAREN)CASTAGNOLI 7476 JACARANDA PARK ROAD 4104 NAPLES,FL 34199-0000 SANTOGATTA,MICHAEL I&ANNI 3S1 SPINDLE HILL RD WOLCOTT,CT 08716•--1112 SAVELL,H LENE 8 2506 ORCHID BAY DR APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109--0664 SBROCCO,THOMAS A CARMEN A TORRES 2269 MILL STREAM CT NAPLES,FL 34109--000D SCHLINDER,JOSEPH 2270 MILL STREAM CT NAPLES,FL 34109-.1713 SCHWAB TIE,ERNESTA ROBERTA L SCHWAB SCHWAB FAMILY TRUST DATED 06/28/01 2086 SPOOKY HOLLOW RD NEW KENSINGTON,PA 15068---8708 SEGUIN,BRIAN 0 6 REBECCA 48 FENGLER RD SCARBOROUGH,ME 04074---8490 SEIFERT,MARY ET 2426 ORCHID BAY DR APT 203 NAPLES,FL 34109--7683 SENRA,MANUEL&MARGARET ANTERO=&EDUARDA SIMAO 205-145 CARTIER AVE PONTE-CLAIRE,DO CANADA H95 SA2 SHAWDEE,EARL H&KAREN A 7447 MILL POND CIR NAPLES,FL 34109--1708 SHELDRAEE,RU. JOAN H SHELDRAKE 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE804101 NAPLES,FL.3 410 9-0 52 6 SHOWALTER.IL,SIDNEY H 7399 MILL POND'CIR NAPLES,FL 34109--1734 SIDERI,JOYA A 2541 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 202 NAPLES,FL 34109-7610 SIENKIEWICZ,USA A. STEVEN A SIENKIEWICZ 955 SAN SEBASTIAN DR FENTON,MO 63025-3018 SILVIA,MANUEL BARBARA BARBARA FORTIN-SILVIA 2369 RIVER.REACH DR NAPLES,FL 34104-6926 SIPOS,AGNES R 2911 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 102 NAPLES,FL 34109---7649 SMITH,PARKE E 1869 NE:CATAWBA RD LOT 144 PORT CIINTON,OH 43452--3697 SMITH,RICHARD 0&DEBORAH L 1829 SOUTH BROOKLYN DRIVE STOUGHTON,WI 53589--0000' SMITH,RICHARD DR MARILYN H 2526 ORCHID BAY DR APT 201 NAPLES,FL 34109.-0671 SPANGLER,PHYLLIS 2526 ORCHID RAY DRAPE 203 NAPLES,FL 34109-0671 SPANIER,CYNTHIA 5 2861 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 204 NAPLES,FL 34109---0657 ST KATHERINE'S GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH,INC 7100 AIRPORT PULLING RD N NAPLES,FL 34109-1716 STANEX,THERESAA 7476 JACARANDA PARK RO APT 103 NAPLES,FL 34109-0653 STARR,SUSAN M 2841 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 204 NAPLES,FL 34109--7656 STASTNY TR,LEE E MARILYN I STASTNY TR UTD 12/14/89 TRUST AGREEMENT 13600 HONEYSUCKLE DR HUNTLEY,IL 60142--7769 STEVENS,MARY E 7655 CALIFORNIA ST HELENA,MT 59601--0000 STEVENSON,CHARLES W&MARIE M 2476 ORCHID BAY DRAFT 103 NAPLES,FL 34109.41629 STEVENSON,DEBORAH R 2541 CITRUS tan DR IT 703 NAPLES,Ft 34109--7610 STEVENSON,KAREN C MURIEL R STEVENSON-10H NSON 2812 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 103 NAPLES,FL 34109-.•7649 ST-ONGE,JEAN-CLAUDE MARCELLEL ST-ONGE 150 AVE ST PIERRE ST-JEROME,OC CANADA 17Y 3V3 STREIT,MARK F&.KATHLEEN 126:WISNERST PARK RIDGE,IL 60068-3548 SULLIVAN TR,UNDA1 LINDA I SULLIVAN WE TRUST UTD 12/23/05. 2517 SAILORS WAY NAPLES,FL 34109.-7618 SULLP/AN,HARVEY 2907 APPLETON CT OAKVILLE,ON CANADA L6J ASS SUNNY JACARANDA LLC 2634 COACH HOUSE WAY NAPLES,FL 34105--0000 SUSANNA L THOMPSON REV TRUST 7425 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RD 41102 NAPLES,FL 34109-2566 SUTTON,PATRICIA 1 2611 CITRUS JAKE DR APT 201 NAPLES,FL 34109---7609 SWOYER,.DON E 32719 WEYRRIDGE ST WESTON LAKES,TX 77441-0000 SYMONDS,SONDRA I 2526 ORCHID BAY DR APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109--0671. TAAQOR,KENNETH LAWRENCE CAROL ANN TAMOR 10367 NORTHRIDGE COURT WHITE LAKE,MI 48386-•0000 TANTILLO,ROBERT I&ROSE M 220 BLACK ROCK TPKE REDDING,CT 06896-2518 TESSIN,PATRICIA SCOTT ECKHART ET AL 2541.CITRUS LAKE.DR APT 103 NAPLES,FL 94109---7610 THOMAS TR,CHARLES W MARY JANE THOMAS TR CHARLES&MARY 1 THOMAS TRUST UTD 12/30/03 2812 W PRESERVE LN MUNCIE,IN 47304--0000 THOMAS,SANDRA P 2550 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 202 NAPLES,FL 34109-0655 THOMPSON EST,BARBARA B %CHRISTOPHER 8 THOMPSON PR 2486 ORCHID BAY DR 9103 NAPLES,FL. 34109•--0662 TILLOTSON,RICHARD&SALLY 1573 WINDSWEPT AVE NAPLES,FL 34109-17000 TIMOTHY AACREE AND CHRISTINE AGREE TRUST 3521W DAFFODIL DR BEVERLY HILLS,FL 34465.-2227 TIMOTHY M MATHEWS AMD TRUST 2811 NAVARRE AVENUE OREGON,OH 43616-0000 TODD,JANICE. SS7 FOREST GATE OR WATERLOO,ON CANADA N2V 203 TOWNS,MICHAEL 0 SUSAN(TOWNS 10 MALCOLM CLOSE LOCKSHEATH HAMPSHIRE ENGLAND 5031602 TRACEY,JOHN 1&CAROL L 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD APT 202 NAPLES,FL 34109--0654 TROIANO,OLGA N 2420 OLD GROVES RD 6101 NAPLES,FL 34109-7681 TUFF,RALPH W&KATHRYN E 949 OAKRIDGE AVE SHOREVIEW,MN 55126-5943 TUZZO.O,JAMES A&BARBARA M 16518 83RD ST HOWARD REACH,NY 11414-2946 UPTON,JEAN L 7463 MILL POND OR NAPLES,FL 34109-^1708 UY-FRANKLIN,LIBERTY 7479 MILL POND OR. NAPLES,FL 34104-1708 VAINER,SIMON B&LYUDMILA 2436 ORCHID BAY DR APT 201. NAPLES,FL 34109--0656 VANSICXLE,DOREEN. 2445 ORCHID BAY DRIVE 014-103 NAPLES,FL 34109-7684 VENTAS CARLISLE liC 1115 WACKER DR STE 4800 CHICAGO,IL 60606--4719 VERTIN TR,PETER G 4453 S COUNTY ROAD 960 W FRENCH LICK,IN 47432-9445 VITOLO,CHARLES FRANCESCA GREGIRIADES 140 CAPTAIN THOMAS BLVD 0108 WEST HAVEN,CT 06516---0000 VOGENEY,EILEEN 7495 MILL POND OR NAPLES,FL 34109.-1708 W 1 HAUSLER JR REV TRUST EST C/O ERIC R HAUSLER 7563 BERKSHIRE PINES OR NAPLES,FL 34104--0100 WAINSCOTT II,FOREST H 7527 MILL POND OR NAPLES,FL 34109-1702 WARREN TB,JANE E JANE E WARREN REV TRUST UTD 1/19/99 2501 CITRUS LAKE DR 0 106- NAPLES,FL 34109-7601 WASILEWSKIEST,OLGIERD WASILEWSKI,MAGDA 7423 MILL POND CIR NAPLES FL 34109-1708 WEIDNER,UNDA JOHN BUCKEY 7534 MILL POND CIA NAPLES,FL 34109-1711 WELLS,ARTHUR A&NORMA E 2446 ORCHID BAY DR AOT101 NAPLES,FL 34109-.-0000 WILLIAMS,HELEN K. 7456 JACARANDA PARK RD 8102 NAPLES,FL 34109--0000. WILLSHIRE,FRANK A NELLY B WILLSHIRE 2436 ORCHID BAY DR APT 102. NAPLES,FL 34109-0658 Will-SHIRE,FRANK A 7416 PLUMBAGO BRIDGE RDA 103 NAPLES,FL 34109-0626 WILMA I SIX I FER LW TRUST 7543 MILL POND CIR NAPLES,FL 34109-1702 WILSON,GERALD H&ELIZABETH 1350 OXFORD ST UNIT310 HALIFAX,NS CANADA MN 348 WIMBISCUS TR,JAMES I&JUDET WIMBISCUS FAMILY UVING TRUST UTD10/15/07 101731ST ST PERU,IL 61354--3806 WOODMAN JR,ALBERT LEE&WANDA 2460 OLDGROVES RD APT 101 NAPLES,FL 34109-0660 YOUNG,REGINA A&JIMMY M 6835 PENNS CHAPEL ROAD BOWLING GREEN,KY 42101-0000 YOUNG,ROBERT E 7343 MILL POND CIRCLE NAPLES,FL 34109.0000 YT NAPLES IC 2406 ORCHID BAY DRIVE X204 NAPLES,FL 34109--0000 YURASEK,HELENMAE 2541 CITRUS LAKE DR APT 206 NAPLES,FL 34.109--7610 ZEAITER,FOUAD ANDREA AWADA ZEAITER 24 W LANE CT DEARBORN,MI 48124--1131 ZENK,RUTH M 2811 CITRUS LAKE OR APT 206 NAPLES,FL 34109--7649 IF ....., .. i 111:1 MI $2iIJ Nei, 00 co _ cm INW MM BEI IM WO MO _ ♦ • Z —, — ft id MN M■1 NM - , — —_ r.. — C — �1111� f1^o g4 o X1111 Fit x p� �sz:�l�i�lll!111;•I. N =D r,= *ii a a-a eNei srulln�i --- 7inium;��1111111111UQ11111 -,as-''Irk. p — = .%EMI , 1‘.', IZ, L ��.N ladwnal�anpg .. ..' ri,P5r° 1 tri...i.... iI0 s Ic Q%/1111►l w J n ■()OCe . \ ANIN '�„ ir.ort^ulmd -• —x 'ir ort'u m �_? zi 'F -- l ! �A tju li N �, �; 00 0 . \' i_jjjjI 11 i co 8 . .uumIII!; , ! : '4'F 1 - . , a mi 4\01U1/4 ■Ililllllll t PI ill' SI NW mi sm IM MI MI In Nl lama(' Ni IBMB( } IligligAQUIMI111 1111111112P"1, 1111!1! &VI MI II ' =1 . 1010114/111/41174W4 4 1i X1111 — ,. C. , ► Atk ig !! !moa • i IE'-1i ra 1 riE III Ifs.il I la Air■ _ s' AP _o wog * ZEE =Iv .. 0 i 40,, 411.111*III it IIIF tub :1: _&to %a, .11►:�_i!iii me A:Ns :ii v r114L11►; Z+N TAAOM TRARP IU3.aTl m R. RI a !� ' - ��` 9 al S1 1 l 600D'.ETTEfRANK ROAD KR.l511 �l 'p pm N u -'y ____GDDD[ETE.RANM RWO ' ` y�Y7i S� pq 2jy$ . . In! �R451 �I Aimmom a-g. Risir .; iP $_ 24 gli 1 ,„ ,r 1 , I ) gi4 Fi ti Lf 3 R gg2 a n 111" Iii -1 I c l -a AIRPGRT•PUWYG ROAD �ei AHIPORT-PNWNG ROAD QT!$� — {C.R.III :ail i n Di RR Y3 Z . • 11 4 ill I yy QQ LL PRIDAN RAR91 n Y �-• I r 6 fi GVOR NDISDNNn (CM UNMG37GN ROAD - > p I :trial* t -\ o m` ull i i ' y E p I „ r J - 1 ' [,r. a F .� INTERSTATE-TS 11 4R I 3 CIRRUS NODS DDIF A:MUM/CRS INTEFBTAIF.•7S H. IAAIINDTCN 13 i m g$g � § § 2E. g£� =0 l:p� m� U $q ati 9 u it Z C D 7 Nor ro 1st" '9 it 1.1.°) I 8 @ iY Y xi 2 O Y Y G r -- .TTIYI� Y_ r�� E TIO3N 11 -� e��© g i�� A � ��y y 1,0 ea W N on i H-.4 blib. " 1 - g '3 e n sagas. "p . . '� Y § O 2 D Agl�� rte®®oikil��odQee� v , a 0 a o � > AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD CANAL = otalloW CANAL • !.� iI a q r �my '� U § C Oj c aQ om + 1 40 NW, oI2 is 1 Z IA -4 a c I % " LONE aR�•. © iii O Y o \ "1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, March 17, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL., to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of CollierCounty,Florida amending Ordinance Number 14-24, the Buckley Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, to add single family detached dwellings and two-family, duplex dwellings as permitted uses in the residential component of the PUD, to add a master plan for residential development as an alternative to a mixed use or all commercial development, to add deviations to allow more signage and to allow dead-end streets.The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Airport-Pulling Road (CR 31) and Orange Blossom Drive in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 21.7+/-acres; and by providing an effective date. [PU DA-PL20150001084] AMILTO 0 GREENS S NDING PELICAN K < OAKS MARSH 0 PELICAN 0 (DRI) z•„ MARSH u, Z- 7 (DRI) ti, 35 z rf 31 N WALGREENS F 36 A WILSHIRE yA K O m PELICAN LAKES MARKER LAKE a I BRADFORD MARSH �, VILLAS VENETIAN c PLAZA ¢ SQUARE (DRI) VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD VANnERBILT TRUST - I I I VINEYARDS PROJECT (DRI) FOUNTAI GARDENS PARK MONTEREY LOCATION VIN(DRI)DS EMERALD CITRUS LAKES NHS GARDENS - CARLISLE HC^ �^N E OAK .�Z RECENCY / BLOSSOM 1 GROVE SAVANNAH CAY I SIENA 4----...PLACE LAGOON / LAKES 6 SLEEPY LONGVIEW FIRST HOLLOW — ITALIAN ENTER BAPTIST SUNSHINE '"MAN - LONE CHURCH V.F.W. BEAR F' CREEK OP HA AUTO KEYSTONE PLACE WILLOW PARK All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to Thursday, March 17, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252- 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman No.952943 February 26.2016 Buckley MPUD PUDA-PL2015-1084 Collier County Planning Commission SIGN POST AFFIDAVIT SIGN POSTIN INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8,COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s)must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen(15)calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s)must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code,Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s)must be securely affixed by nails, staples,or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post,or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place,and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY,PERSONALLY APPEARED Alexis Crespo WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PUDA- 015-1084 ( , IC 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. #305 SIGNATURE OF MCP ANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O.BOX Alexis Crespo Bonita Springs, FL 34135 NAME(TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY,STATE ZIP # STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this S day of 2�t'Y.lGlt� , 20 L_ ,by l`1 t S Ct+e ersanally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. ;∎;: "19';'• JACQUELYN LAROCQUE ` (��,,�,��—,» -' e r Notary Public-Slate of Florida 'V tur= : Notary Pub-' 4 c N u My Comm.Expires Oct 12.2016 1 ;f,u17-00- Commission S EE 831330 �0,-C--Oki),e j( r La co�,�,� ,n,n,,, v��nV b Printed N ie of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev.3/4/2015 pu*uc$AMMio INDMEEITMO AN MEIMME t1n TO A PLAMH#wm DEVELOPMENT WOOL/ PemID%A R,wFiS33ff y0r�milrMfH tnr..VAN 10 • DOW ;47=41 r • it S, • • ANOOKAA MAMMA RIKAHAMAG AN m to a PUMAS MIT aavietopu rr ovum PtV PS%a PM-Pl}IiS W U4 Meta MO,nw.Sn he ee,e4 Mr,inelte MOM./elf MP eeee MS=Serf pYX%fY14 tt: • .