Loading...
Agenda 03/01/2016 WBCC AFFORDABLE HOUSING WORKSHOP MEETING AGENDA MARCH 1, 2016 Affordable Workforce Housing Workshop Board of County Commissioners Chambers March 1, 2016 9:00 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners LA WORKSHOP AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples FL 34112 March 1, 2016 9:00 A.M. Commissioner Donna Fiala, District 1- BCC Chair Commissioner Tim Nance, District 5 - BCC Vice - Chair; CRAB Chair Commissioner Georgia Hiller, District 2 - Community & Economic Development Chair Commissioner Tom Henning, District 3 - PSCC Representative Commissioner Penny Taylor, District 4 - CRAB Vice - Chair; TDC Chair 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Affordable Workforce Housing Presentation 3. Public Comments and Community Dialogue 4. BCC Guidance on Affordable Workforce Housing S. BCC guidance on SHIP Purchase Assistance Limits 6. Adjourn Notice: All persons wishing to speak must turn in a speaker slip. Each speaker will receive no more than three (3) minutes. Collier County Ordinance No. 2003 -53 as amended by Ordinance 2004 -05 and 2007 -24, requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. is a Founding Principal of Architects Unlimited, a 34 -year old architectural, urban design and town- planning firm. Mr. Hruby has more than 40 years experience in architectural design, community revitalization and development consulting. Mr. Hruby is nationally recognized for his work with affordable housing, mixed income communities and community revitalization. Mr. Hruby is active in community and professional affairs in Naples Florida, where he has resided for the past 18 years. He serves on the board of directors of the Naples Zoo, AIA Florida Southwest and AIA Florida. He is chairman of the Collier County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee and is a member of the Design Review Board of the City of Naples. Both AIA Florida and AIA Florida Southwest have awarded him the designation of Citizen Architect in recognition of his community service. Jaimie A. lZoss is the President and CEO of the Florida Housing Coalition. Prior to joining the Florida Housing Coalition as CEO, Ms. Ross served as the Affordable Housing Director at 1000 Friends of Florida, a statewide nonprofit smart growth organization, from 1991- 2015. Prior to her tenure at 1000 Friends of Florida, Ross was a land use and real property lawyer representing for profit and nonprofit developers and financial institutions with a law firm in Orlando. In 1991, Ross initiated the broad -based coalition that successfully advocated the passage of the William E. Sadowski Affordable Housing Act, providing a dedicated revenue source for affordable housing in Florida. She continues to facilitate the Sadowski Act Coalition to ensure funding for Florida's state and local housing programs. Her work includes all forms of legislative and administrative advocacy and education related to the planning and financing of affordable housing. She authored "Creating Inclusive Communities in Florida: a Guidebook for Local Elected Officials and Staff on Avoiding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome ". With funding from the Rockefeller Foundation, Ross produced "Creating Inclusive Communities ", a macro -media flash presentation on best practices for inclusionary housing programs. Nationally, she serves on the Boards of Grounded Solutions, the Innovative Housing Institute, and the BBVA Compass Advisory Council. Ross is the founder of the Florida Community Land Trust Institute and past Chair of the Affordable Housing Committee of the Real Property Probate & Trust Law Section of the Florida Bar. Kim Grant is the Community and Human Services Division Director for Collier County Government. This Division oversees a wide variety of grant and social service programs serving our community; and also has responsibility for affordable housing planning and monitoring. She and her staff work closely with the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee on affordable /workforce housing related topics. Kim has been with Collier County since 2005, focusing on process improvement and strategic planning before moving to her current position in 2011. w z 0 0 u od ua Ln 0) rZ V) Z3 0 r I z Mr, �� A O sc Its, I 'A "X Z flt is IM 19 WMAS go Ing z go z z 0 • LU cr CL CL LU ON n ,--N, I 0 i NONE mOO■ tommm ■O■ ■OO■ ■OOO ■o■ I d a W FM Z >m W Y P 1 J 000 0 V -�+--J C.) C./ ct A� W ct 0 4-J cz r bA • !f i • A10 �.f 'ff ff 19 i i iw •r i M ii • i i i i i 9 w i_ i♦ aI i i, Ir 0 U F. o v) 0 it ti o c� C.? �+ r� 4� � v O Poo, U bJJ V O '"d � O b� O x a) M �J T 1 T 0 3: E LL �0 T V J i ul c O 0 �► i i I Ln W E CT Q) cr- \V ul Q) 0 V l (T \rr/ 56 11 w C- OD � V I m -i�-J Q) E C: L- Q) 0 M ►.J 1 i 7 Ln L- Q) T m� V i r� r C\I N-. 0) Cl_ - ------,1,, N 4 - ---- N. 1\ 0, it* v) s. v) 0)%._ C 0 CO W \ f-i-- u C ‘4.° CU U 0 cry (C5 +a I -0 .— ..._ — v) Ni > 0 ....r.c 0 1 (1) S.- >. 77. ■ 0 E u eL a) _0 (I) -0 .4.._. u as ... cu ,..., — Q. -1-J 03 .— 0 ro L- : CL a) °., - 0-....., CD .42. (-r) wr 0 +a C *P C > ° *-1--)-- ----D E AN1,0 14-' C > L-- -0 (r) C siii. 0 (1) '3 C = 0. -1--P v) (1) Z (13 0 (V a) 4-0 1 .12 aj ,kNi (13 CO 4_1 CO -0 ...z >: CD 4-) " fa tD. 4- ).14 • 73 v) _C D 4-j "s-: --(13 03 = 14.1 0 -0 0 0 L4- • ..--., -C2 C 4.-) u tirt (:11) 0 co E c (-13 c ..c (1) ...c 14- C]) (f) --Z 4-) 0 0 to .C. r_ cl) v) _C -0 .... t -Z r5 vl •ri: = --) -4 ° 44.1m W 4.-; '"' 0 CU ••■•••0 inilill til L.=. OD CD ...."*3/4 E L. v) (-0 0 up w Ls) = ._ iv catp no c c ....... tio .4.– ..c u •– > --) -0 p „ , -0 —1-11 N. 0 a) Lr) c C . s3) 5 c ..., D .— r...„, tao > ro (73 —0 61,74 ......... 0 L.- — U r-i 4_, C t:10 (./-) .— 0 14--/— .4--) 0 (1) ell -0 0 co ___ 4_, .4_, _ ....c C]) (I5 Z a M. 44 •— a) — u-) ni --c-5 , v) co ._ ..)--., 0 4,...) L. CU -4--) C/1 Z 1-.. '— . ........ 0 C CZ (1) 4j •--, C 1 U CU C +a CU o ...._4-2 4-- ...0 I.--. >' 'v)-- -5 (I) C2- > 0 0 _c .0 0 WI _C 0_ .4--) (.3 0 • • M 1146 e vt C 0)41 al .0-2 M w 4--; D Q.) '4'4>*.- 0 :Z3 'It 5,.... u**) t iti %4/1.4 (DE ...___":4."'4__ C t 1° , ,. . . . 'P ZA CZ CI) Q C • (1) 0 E .--- -o � - L... tch s_ CO -o H. (-0 4,+-: Z *LA--- bn Q.. co to _o c co cu (I) (1.) 1•4 D 0 (f) ..... — 0 E b.o sr, , --o .e c w .--- E c s.... CO cD 0 (i) 0 r C ...-.. Z C 0 0 0 u_ U J CO (1) • • • T :',',.,,.,'''''''''''''''' LL 0020 i 000 I / , Miti ,..',.,, ,11 t t * " Cl) cing) , - -,ee c 4 .,1 , LI :, ,: ..,. .. , , ..,..00: . ..,:. .... 'i,. -_,, ... .. .. r-t,-., ,. ..„ .. .. ....._ ki tkokill) eimsZ I . '',,' :it :,.. 0 ,....1 . - PI: • (id Ct '''.1.'"?41'--.7::',114rwAil.:11-'4-tIt'eci,'", ....-,,-.e.,„,..--,!,,-- --.„.' .,,,,,i,:::: 4 'Im,*,1 Fimmi • 4 ..00 . , . . `. - E' , .. ... ... .. . LO 6 a Cri t } H f _ 45 "; �` . 7: till 414,, '41111F = ral‘' , r� �" '`"� tag so"i ;04 yam' � , .« l'i 4 N '''...,,...1.--*. ''_'- .:;:„.! '- ' •, rip ZQ _,,,,,-,,,...... ,. . ....... , ,•, " . Q...} • .01.11,_ - 1_ �� i _ w , .., =. :.,,,i. .:71..a.ti.,..„ ___=::: w t„) _ 4) ...+"' 'vo _ - =-• py - ,,.... ..,... 11111 •- -i- '',� I ,.� ,Y VII. Imi 1 to a i 0:Co . 1 SOS Oa Ct J 4... t ., A t° 0 t,..4. rst ' I !.. '....,, 0 p . „...1 TTT d 0 4 1.1 1. ,1,-Y 1. " ..„„_,...v .___ ., ..../. : i 4.4: i.., ,...1.7 ; ..i .4c.CA p Pot ‘ Ir, '---...4w,,1 ,N...,, ( ' r *c'-': o 0 .'i4+ ' ' IN - .--- 3 e •,_,<,______ .,., ,.:., ,. . „,„.„.: .,...,,,, c.„) i.z .,..„ , :J. .. CI) i '_-- ,.-i, . -' --,....-.-..--. V 74 :.. ,, ..44,-:R �� 7, „,..t t.... .„.. ,__ _ i_____f_i . rt ... , ,i.C) 7,11,1 ..,:-.... f,. 0-t. ." _.., ,,,, c . ' ,, ="E CO # ( i 1 (37 4 t �, 3 i . " Atii ;:a• „.4 _, 4 g -# �,+ J wi •_• p may. �-,,... , , • 11-11 Z . ______ 4 ,,,....e 0 t ,, f i (10) immil piii4 i.: 4- . P V 0 Pali , r 6 0 0z ozei V {o co. ; roll*X) can 4-.) � ro -1 044 01 Oto CI +_, CU C ,'1 C Rai ,' tl •; -0 o4-1 .,._ ' ,> ip-4 4-0 . . • Z d.) = t3 •—" c1l 2 Po J NI% SC C V •E > E • T r* r.+ M 0 CO **-- 0 —C •— " tVZ '''. U:) CD 4—I iiim-o cu 6. a j 2.5 -0 , 0 4- % 0 = t15 _i a. c 1 V t, -- = Ct U � _' u a) •fig a) cu PO U t,/°3 p CCU .. ..... 4 XI TS X 0 4 6 = a) (3) U c4 op can cu .+..+ CU cat .,...,.. Ct •.... C7 a} `.L. ' Ln a.a 0114 U... ---- w ...C4_, a co r ci) a_ O. I I ° ' ... .. 1 .f..:——- ,.:. ' ''.T1 AO,' .■,. .,,.; lo.')74k 1 Cr • A" 4-- i ' . . Y ' • Will . . .... . ' , Z .' ■ - '. . , . , ■ . , . . . . . ., .• , AY • --, ,.. 1 , . I ' • th ,,, , , , .. .-.,,, ' tt•;,,,t. \\ ... ,„.. . .. C tt ., , , , \ .., _ . ::!- . '--.., tts .' ‘,,, \ • roi ,.??1 •:•''-'.-#-, ',-, to 111■1 .. ,e. . -,.. -?... \ , f,. Pm* t t-i -- ,t tt - ._ ._ . ., (1111111:111 -4 .....— OD CO ..........., > 11■111■ ›* 73 if) 3.0 . ---u) (75 L- 1-r) 0 0 C (..r) D u 00 Cr vl ..... a.) >,.. 0 •..... _ r_i LI_ (f) C —C) —C CD X t .1(1) (r) U >, -I—' :5 (1.) >- CO en ,..... — L.) C N.! 4--),__ Q CO D co CIO -0 tn-al (13 (E) 73 411 C C C D t•-; r'11 •— CU = .4-1 ton (..n. •_.. . m u E = -0 0 0 w -- 4-i m ....... g,.... co — V) C (-05 let U 0 CU I–; a..) a - .) -1-J ~4-* c ..._ • • 0) t a 1 40a 034 } 0 t, I ftY V 2 -0 C Foie C ••in V1 m 4,a •i �� 4) = c +No Z Ln. •= c (13 g- t!) .— cc 4U 0- C 0 �u E Ci) Z GJ ,c L CU Qa > Q D CD ci - ( = ft3 - ci 4) (31 N l 4J - z� -a co tiV C6 = 0 — }- . 0- CU 'C a (CS o c Z Z Ln Cr a- -C 4) ' cjy (lj > •— ° c 0 Z t11 ff3 U Q .0 u) x C7 'C .— 4J 0 -0 4) . vo 0 D- Lf • L -C >- C 4) #_, 0 t110 73 n 7:3 LID .� _ u co CU L O 0 +- ( 4-' -0 t/i (U Q c6 4 4— 'c I I U (U CD CD _F U 0 (N 6 0_ r ,.......... ., P; iar S� ,, ,,,,, „,,; , ), „...,7 :::4 Mit , :Holt.,. - t'i ... .,.. !t a #a • ri a Eta{ {{ s ' Lt37t2 suC) I t d* � tot tom • ;It!, = 4 .,,,44 ' - ..i-,,: -- tus4)■ . `-- F { 0 fit, i ...—.... : ..4, _ 0 , , Z ',' ' I-1, .''riu . . '� LOT 14 93 Z „- 0 a) • � CA 73 0 .9 O (o +n D — rya ZC>') ?":.) a) o rz tf) E 0 tn Z o s� c, - eta _ u _..1 �n 03 ` c..' cu r) co >a a °' +�> E .- a_~ a, s_ > a • F., ft3 • ,_ 73 tiC 5k.. U (C{ • r s— �.. N 6 d. 4-) DZ2 i 0 tan 034 1 CL s. v) 4..., -1--a ......,, a) > a) D ....... a) Fil"4 -0 0 D c 073 Iti _0 •— CU a,a C � E D ro M ...c 22 ---. 014 4-) 4=. 0 n 4' cl 0 ` — V) CD ±a = --C3 C C O --ro E CU 7.3 _C v) C '6 -a " E4_) (13 0 4-, c -0 " L- Cal) (13 0 C v) - ( C 7) 0_ , a) s__C Cri 0 (1-) D Q)V) -J CY) • • • to N N 6 d till 40 at�� l Q) 0 .... 1 Cl) .E C x -0 (1) 0 73 a 0 0_ 0 cu co (4) ci) Q L--- E 4-' -c ›... a.) c Z >- 0 1-- 0-- > Z a-.5 la) t+- CO ‘.....' ID ...c C > .-0 7 - D 4- _ CD73 .(7) t 0) L.- -0 .77(1) W or) V) c a-' CD CO [ILI 0 E ._ ,___Q) 2 _c 4---0 'Q) V D `e- - c'6 ti) 1-0 E ° a) a) _c cl M 0 D E L.) c (73 . ,-.1 = E -too- 73 co '4 8 ',, 0 F•4 eL L) Cri 0 c 2 4-) >. E Cu Ste. V C ` U D O E < n t, • • • • M .-. Or' I/ N 6) a_ '1 71 ro 0 0 _o C.) Ct3 ID ----- c L.. -0 U C1 ' 0 -0 u_ 4- C7S 0 Li_ 2 Esuml 4— k..) G.) u_ 1,- E v) C > C . � 0 bn Co E CO r9 C 0 C H co -A 0 co Q 0 ,,,.4 c,......." „.,__ Q., , — fzu (L) a.) P -4-j E ul u(1) E 03 c -I—)t •- C ro O L_ C (131-- CU tj C 0 Co U I E to CAA a s, h� C C CU OP E 11) 0 D 0 0 F 00 > c: Co P.M ■IC 1 1 U CI U < -2 , • • • 0 • v N Ii ^ Oz DE4 4—' :'a CD x00 1 f WI D Q) CU G) 4- S-. 0.. C' aU U o ‘„, •....... co 1 cl 0 -,, LJ. IS ` -• f C -0 b.O - CD s= > ' (a) F..: 0 0 -� 0 .-- U C v) o E . , .. 0 s- (1 D +-a (i) a >ro °' -C3 n i ...c. _a) -e = a •- U ..= .E E 0 o u 4T, F v) 4_, .1 v) o til w CU a.) (f) 2 . v) a- > CD r N 6 A {�a a,7jj1 �.. 0- .I Cu) . .j .0 -� 4 :I CD 0 4 1'- _ Co Cii) C13 pasi c L'", 2 (1) E puo CL .v) • 0 E D 0 —i co g4 i 0 co u 4J c 4J c ' — a) aC (1) 0 (91 -0 0 m 0 ---1 E C b.0 a) CD n U (1) c.y.:,« 0... ,e .> 1 Cr) > V (1:1 (1..) a—► 4—) CO -0 CO -1-) eF) 73 7:5 E (1) E c L'i cut w cu x E l- rcl CZ1 CD - • Two 0 v) ° -P ° -1-) (13 7-114 C , 414 • • • co N C 73 E 4_, _0 CFA s : `" ' ,. I 4-+ ...10.10 rr3 Q •0.11NO 11 % v) E a) = _c 0.0 -0 4-) -0 1.— c 4+- C 0 D ("3 4-+ (aA 4:: 0 r\J r...a3 a) 4-F, ► . •C .S .. co_to eto 0c 2 S CCU -0 tuJ a. 5.,?, 2 n tab— ._ w Q.) E Ln... r--4 ..c ID rts .— .. \do 4_, ro CI. -1--' tan E C C cl v c `Z3 . CU S.., tti to 0 ;;... E ..,.... CU. C 0 0 3 CU -0 CU ial) CD CU a j U .> C a L.. 0 bA L_ 0 CU C6 C w +-1 U CD c) U C6 RS i.. C + 1 Q CO 0. - N- N m a.. 0 11* cV C ' , cu u•._... C 5 U tv . . a.) a) V) -1--, .,...a 4-1 ...?'''. tf) .13 7:3 -0 co C 2 v) c c 0 co (13 co c.3 .0 v) E t A 4--J' • CU C s.. 0 6:423 .ED E -C F— - 1 - > c ta0 U 0 4 s_ D 73 L • 0 0 c _ c CU > sr c -o Q -c eA (-7)(V .- t ' —1 cU n 1"1.1 s_ co L.- E 4.) .c c o �'' Ste. 0 s_ cn .E: 47" (e) 4:7" E 4—) " 147:; s_ s_ ft3 .E u E bp W f-IC .(7) r-IC 0 E C ° I-- c CD c a- co U .-17. • • co U- { V / (1)■ 0 E 4 0 Li c 0 > (,) 0 E i E _ 4-j(-0 co _c 00 _L. 0 CT) (N w 0 1.4...1 Nosuroll F CL a 4 , ', ,,,,,61:- '''444,1.,,,,.. f Ciiiii3 LL-1 LINJ a cD . 1 ci.) , ammill t:', , , ,,,,,,.: Iii :, (t .,., Mini w 0 co 6 d 04nd F.114:1 ctO) w (1■1) ei ,(1,), Z 0 z ril„, C PIO N i i ' c 0 N Nt,2, = W 00 10 qzt N N I co) I Q LO e c,, e., . F., ,..4 itf ritzi 0 E:..3) (I.) 0 z .2,3 ;:l., 0 Ct Forniel4 11,f (11) I E o 7.- CO 1:1, 6) 0 ..... I— ?".•',' •..,,,,,,- .0.,'='2 ...,,,,•.,. m ..,,,,.. . t:4 , ',.... ,,.., Vit r A CI.). tO .., C') VI PI ,....Ak. , ilm4 r* s_INNI1.4 1"4 (.1) 43.) C) r,•••1-I illini III -0 L. C) . .....— . — ........... .,.._.... :,. , 10:- CD e."... 3-- . , r‘ow.,1 (I) 00...,4 :175 --,i f 75 /....i r-- CU . .„ ,.._ tn t4....1 , ,--- (1) x C.,,...) , . ,... cc; 4—, Cir) _ cu 13) 4--.4 a3 0-.) .t r-4 o pinion"i E cn 13 C.) r- - ,---- „,. N co a_ i f�hh V` I- 0 (n ,� N 73 c 'r ^" .74 tt co 0 ®y ° "' I ow pl as C-) •r~.1 i .• Ire, :- • I e; _ _. W O O O z Q .- r( . a , r • 1�i 4`'s - \(.? 'moo/"�. ,J 1 C` f v a< < i 1 I • t\ ter' k I•II • F .. G G +cik4 % co co cd W 4- 0 s. .0 10 _0 — CO s we i ID r ice r W [ ito! .....1 [swag' Z 11.1 © I'we - w 0 C4 0 1-- tNI owe r 6EXC '', ' F /00Z CI r m vlm \ is , 1 v, 900Z -e1 tr0 f 8 / Vf..'.t...l).: E C ll:) pm-1 C �. 1111. - 0 11.11. QOM I IL1 a 00 { VI Ne o; c 00 r, rape i''''', �i a.E) I I: çE 0 4Q) .1. 0 0 N:). 0 0 0 '.3 c ::9(Y",) @J). _ 0 Q.....,D C-8) 111 0 C v rag E.= , ..„., 2t3 a, c„,„ 0 0 s.... a 0 cL9) cl) 0_ ..., „„. .. ...-- , :., t 't;itrfti !: 1 . . . - ' , ,..,..., ..",....v.. f -,.t. it . :,„,,..... :_,....,... ,,, :,..„ .,,, • , , .,....„:„...,...,. , . .., .. . , ,... , . .. „.., _ ... ..., . ..---7- !".--:-,14- , :.• .,, IL. , „ . , . ki..! I ''; ..1.11'...,.. 1 ,- , • -.;,,,.. :„..t1 17h1 nil II N, ,,, ,- i- :-., I .'; : • , '2,,------ . --' . :',;..= ' ' N : ,,,,, .-..1. — ..,... ...., . _ FA [ ./..:Yc -, —0"'''i -' '' ,,-.--,:• 1 r.:fr , I — I ,,,.-_,7..g4.-;; . , ,„,, ,,, : (II _..., (0 M m .■Y En C O < 1_,. Q (1J ESL' Q F' ) a W j5 Lli E ui 0 C w -- (10 d- J W O O z O t1 )mi co 0 LI. w ,o 8 O u. H 0 _I � U U oW . 0 >1%.% ¢ wow r0 r-� I ao v -Jw O L . 0 n d a CO °C Q� = m Q a. W Q V 05 a o >- Z CO a0 0 _� o ° o Z. Ili ce D LU CY) 8 o < u, CI) QQ • . . N QD •• • 0 • • UW as 0 CiQ Ou_ .� a 0 1-- < _. N. co 6 i C CO 11::1 soli freak Lill ' CL Y l c cu Qv) 4+ - :ill! E ON lialla ..3 ci c 4°1 E v low COI 2 1...tai C + - „,,,,„,--:,:,..,,,,,,-",::',,,I,',::::::„.::::::,..::,',,,,,l,:,,,',,,,,,,:::;,,,,,;iii..,,,,..!,7„,,,, Ci Ct. VI ZINI• !:::,,,:.,i,,,,'„4:,_,,,.....::::::;,,,,, -t'„,,,'L.:?,.--..,:,-;.,:;,1,-,-.":':,.-,,,L,,,,,,,i-:,,,,,-' f 9s 4.11 e MIN C lit. -• -I• 'iii - -'• 2, x „ ,,, 0 ,,,. • ct. ,,,,, c ... ,,, ., . ., , , X 4.111111 Eklik A 141 mow' ”' yam. 0,„„1„,,,,� up mom yY 'y; c x IE ': . -ix.. ::, 141.11 411) 1 MN mild MOM 41) LI X au u. tilit C:3 iri Nbir oo M a I 1 1 }i� 1 IA (\-. 2 0) Cn 0 } } 0) ., , >_ Full 0 0 E a) C a. - c _° 0 .?'N L..-> L..— (0 W _ U -0 D E L__ u-) U) C co C E W 0 W c _c a co INN . . D 4_5 E (1.),, g -74--=-.) 0 - 0 E. -� C c- 11°I g 1E ...cu.]) _..z Vi rY (I) _. 0 OielitiO E. , c) _ %11,1 f 1 { 05 co 6 d ,---, Ti Zw. 44.- .... • 4,01 ,.�, Z ti ...w� C rat r• V CL as Illi '�''` � tai a i 4). ft *-6.. "C: til **1"` = a w 0. CU 0 e.,4 Lo. C au arty 7 Z v) ft. ra w +0CZ W a C. 0 E a' 0 kJ (LI *21 ' ' ow mow tor) A INNS ilikV) 0 CU Q III '! P 3 x614° u ...E 'fi Es 1:14.c ...... .„. }�}y ,......., ..„...,. ..„ .,. .., 2 {'�rYS^c 4;, , w +6 itt) siii.c-i _cm -T3 E 6 . „.,..„...,,,,,._,,,„„,.:,,,.„,„,,,,:,,,, :--- 2 ::: ,--._,:z•';',-:-.:::-.:i.::. ..--3-:;.-, ,,,,,k c •;-(' tots- ti) 4.) 0.1 cu 4.0 „..,..:.,,,,,,,„.i..„....,,,,,...x isa ast iii,•.,r .4,) , E c L,.,,,, ,-.-.: .;:.:,.::::_. -. ..... — -- -2,-. ski:---;:7--,„ 0 u. c ih., 0 iim sag , -•,:::::,••:-..L.::--,?-..-:::i.::•-:r >ft . 4) al- .e.- tko .=., L.,:..:,...,....• .,.:;,,,.:t.,..., ... i. , „. • , . a ,..,,:-.$••.,•,,,,....•1•;,.:.:•••,..:,•- •v, , c.... ...- .. 06 `'C i1111r[ si.rr YM�F tai .NO s am ....., a) c'7. ° E 1 hk i r 0 a. imossmeamema.., NOM rt mi. i ci t(A CU 4'4 er C f4 e 1:1 E tirt 1... ro c r # tip 0 iilt ligroil ut ane 0 m . La � C C C > cu w 4 r ,a. .,--\ ,, � F .z, in � 3 �f i4 / J, // q,i C °: te. Ai $w,+d: 5 C C ,, zs $ '20 3 0 W ..Now 4) W C4 *M> ," r 2 u .Zi E § pp{{ 'a* ar R +w y 13 °. § F � C '! .' ; VON, r�sc # Q }fit � :airi Mr') MY a { alter > ,,�, Nr a. 44 C 0 �— . . 0 U .° ._ fil 4,41 U. �n ref I W U Ce yr C !iit (:) .82 ‹C .... = z 1C. V) 4.' 4f) i "CS At iiI Ca 0 , Z 401 0 001,111 , X W CO(III '',. ii: MI 4.1 4) I di. . . . 4 ' Us c. 2 � � ,, ot.. !) '. �,. 4 `" * C Ua „' tin � w w % RI . . I =.� MOO 4e til LI 0 ° 4 a ' (4- 6) d I C rlaiem �►-► ._ t1 4° >» c w I 0 CL ` c °` c emi CO N w w U 16°4 1 ' o u'�_ E � 41.04 CU ra je 4b. ►t . c a o. 0 - trl 00 2 ..,.„,,,,,Lr,,,, 3.' {} v c le, ad 1-z c (1) r . Le ..... ' f--,:Q ci p �,, 0- cei 0 a C ao k + 4A - u$ (yam' ♦R M' §3a � z al Cr C cg CO 110 ���`} : b{ �V, " :�. co .1- ci) a... is.,.......\ VI 0 CP C 13 44 U 13 03 C alPi4 C C . C 03 tio CV> 0 C 0 0:11 el , 03 mini immi E 0 ...1 C Z" to , 0 = .... o . li, 00 400 aii 0 4.0 .1:1 41 I IIIIIII 4111 03 . N s.. 472. r: V t ..... b. _ = lim imi. GO w E an ce . .„„„ i.e. It=OD z E 6., . 0,) to 0 — .c 3 m 4.41 v) 4.0. ,4* LLi 0 C Z VI E is.. 0 411 c 0 00 ce in (111 101 ....., CC IL) 0 I V., moll \\ \'■ \[:-"7:A.' 0 ..., ..... -.lig 4114, - 0 ic,.. --J 0 11.0) ,4-"1/) ---/(07,7,-- ,)///)„,, itV1/4„,i? ' 0 0 .1: m13 C al ba ,IJ: 71 C .aor st . I Z 44 47 LI, (T) ..le. : f: * :- C U - .. . . 4..) 13,„ ... i 4,4, . ...Ai lair ,, 3. 46 , • cu - (3) U. v Q ' cf ..1 L z i......\ i m 0 Q N t ' *len 'al 1"°. cL1>,, E-... 0-7,f-c, .t s ZZa� Z. I: a.) 411 E o a., U3 U b410/ > +' `C3 0 C C CID taQ v p fC5 C Q. C M CL) � *Fn."' = t).0 4 = td U) 0 •....... = = to s. Cll = 0 .5. 4:4...., 1... -, ) = >411 >, E %. ..0 o mC 0 = N ID Z3 Lip c•__ C 3 al co 0) C = E ,... ,,,,,,,,,„.,,„. „,,,.. .. .,,,,:. L a.:_ 4444. = E . v, Ell z a)0 . cu „.. v, ..... „. ,,„ , E C.. . U E 10 ca. 5_ DI O to) >, cm c as Lo a ws.« '475 sm. tr) z u • L 0 ra a) mi._ esia 4-.) a) v _. - Et .- try . aj 0 CD gin fa cl)u u 0 s,. U t� C G[ • S . a /,, E IA (f) --- o E 0 2 (i) GI') Cf) - C E I 7 ° I— U 0 -` c 4 U Q) c} co CI ? L--)a) o 2 =1 ' U D Q E W o co 2 I a) E 2 a) E k.) 0 g .-• , o 4_, (D co co 0 ....4 u a) Cll c,3) - . ) 1.16 LU 473 E ›, (i3 CC Ce --4' C 1 c 4w -- E � c 0 ( 0 0 -_r__.)-- _E (4_, -Fti 0 �+ - -C _ 0 (1) D E b 7 -T'cT 2 g cT) E H n • • N. d C L». v 1 CO Ri w v sue. =ri. (ti ci. cis, I.. >, 7,„,, = ...., ti '` iz 0 •— a cu E , a) c iiii (:) ° E CU 0 4-° "1 11. 0 Q) -",--r--% 2 L. w 4— c=. 0) co 1:1 Al LA Gila) Lir, i :1:"17;7'',7;::;.:::::'.'''''''''''' 't. 1 !^ • .1 i/! +� L.L. c i E 6 :,„:::.-t,,,,-.,-,,,:;,-.=:::. mom q y -1:, 2 i.. 0 � µ .- ii %., (i) .2 .5 42) i+. 4.1 s Pligh 10.1k 111111 MINN '‘.. ' til CI E W :; %Yr IIIM.I Um Clir 13) "4" t,.. e : I1,1, ell .... > rot C th MX C 44 Pli tip ,3C vill If 1 ,1 111,. . ; i. g co m 0_ INO IA •— In Ria Ul C C 4ii .MN 0 C 11® • N 4•0 illa fa MI 1111IC arm IC 4rna = tires !In UPI mei 4111 Z IV 1115 CO C 7:11 = 73 c V c in.iva E i C 10/ C ° 'i3 E ; alwri E E ,,, t c 0 Rs VI Z ba moo sum- W in am E Gii U. C ii) Tili No w a) co gl 0 Ce = C V ._ Til ham • ( 0 _ 0 ' 41) In liri aul Cie ; I i.., . , ... , „,m ..° 5 g •— to ow wir Li. in= mg II 0ii I U or c ..., -.„:„. I i mu igt E its :: z r ■ -'1'11114: r., ' . t�Y M ye € t�€ .... .. ....... C) . .. t . _ .. , . . , . i 1 - _ 1 22 '-a•- l'''' .:-':°g• '41s1*'',11 7 zl '' it. -,„:.",,, •-• ,.. ter . ,LE _. [WI \-,, rzt-„,...,-.0z ,....„..."..' ,',....-:,..,<.- .--'-'■-,6 , 4V i 90.-. ,.". tc.: -.,3 .. . ---.,-,;i-,-T ii v. 1110 I -- - E2P. „, ---,•=-4`"' - ,, ,2!,c', : 411t, t 4 t.4 4 k ; .- ';''S' 4 . 1 9-:§ , + 4. ...... it . , , I t ' Z i . , ›. -(1 co ' . i - , to t . c i ::-3- >--. tvo c ._ : -0 ...,:) . :,-, , c , .. , c co , tr, c >IIII ----4:3(a(1) 1 c .1-, L41 i :, '+-..c2c)'11 a) > .47,* - - -0 5 ,- 1. ilk .-° 0'-- . 4-, t.,.. 8.1 C (i) ' . . -0 4-' , I E ...... ; (,) .-1: ,. , 1 tIc "° mai``' ,....4..0 ' 1 E c 46",' 4,, ct7_,r .5 ,,, girl : . (...t ■.-r) ci 4— tio a, ,.... „,tzr -0 u-1 C13 >. Z.`-' a) c cu p '•. or..1 U") 4, C -0 .3:1 :() :i .-:-,.,. taws t, 4.Y3 r° ' ' _.a) u..) CL) ::(1) 1••• ,', (....) I 0 Cti c:t (t:Li) .E 4., (-.t - ' L- C ,J., P .- -- cc 1- i_. ci.) = .4__,.- -c3cu =,,,.. 1_,..c ,..c2 _ _oai rocli . ..c.,.... IL- E ,.....,-- a, NI ,..(:°- 1--0 173 1,74 o : 0 t'n %-.1 1.1.°"a tio L4.1 ,.,- ,_ ,.. s_ ' L.. .c 0 ‘4"-. 1 12 co .47.' c • 0 0- 0 0 0 trl C c,..CL U) CI) 4-tt c) • ,,-.. ,..., CI) '''''• ..< > tn = .- Lft tU3 t20 CLO ti.0 ' bt) 0 i:"-L. s•-' 1- tr) — 03 rG c C C C I C c (Li •-•-. 1- ..,a . .- .- •- .- OD 0 ro E (-12. '- (I) (1) (D o 0. -D 0 , c c c 0 aJ c -- E .__y r_.(-) (if)3 - u -= . 0 cu .-,,-1-L-) a) as 0 0 0 0 tIn _c -,71 ,•': 0. til = 4., ,.... NJ NJ Ni NI c 4-, 0 (1) ',--1:- ,_C, INly 41 ,_,.a) .%. . ' L. 'r'n -,-1 0 0- •S L.) CI) -7--.i.` (,) . A) .,.r.` -- (13 co co co 7-, = I (I) a .._-_-,. , ' - 2)- - 0 C C C C - -0 .. C) = i (f) D : D A .. m .s 0 0 0 0 M r° L'' 0 0 >1.3 -.->' m rti '- *- "171 ..47) 6 ,7,' S' —0, 0 o ° 'cl- ,.= ._ _ ,_ v) ,..f) = m I__ 0.) 1.... - •- „,c . < it 0 '— 0.1 01-s -a C)C) -G .- ci eN •- -Ci 0 --- U U U U C)r-- c C C 2 '' a CC I-1-j 0_ LA, _O ccs - .= - _ — cc (4) I D 0 .i. 1 < a a .u) ,-.• : ; , . .. . -..,..i -•- . . . . . .,.,,.. • • -1':11441-ft'llie1W-LVO litF.A4Zni)MtWiiitiNifiettAafFy:5C: 7,717727:0 o 6 ff CL >aa I i U CD -0 bI C : - " 0 LW (- — " .-- -0 -0 4-J y •- , C C ; (/) D n3 a) 4 , U) 0 a) , c o c , o t_ - a) : -- o C u : 4-, Li__ . c i5 .. .J ' E -- ' 13 v) tx0 03 (D a) ' E ' C D 1-- Z (41'.) tn 9- .5 ' 0 74::; ' 0 ti) CD -- , x a) ..... i_r) ,....., c -0 ..0 1- ) "0 s- imum 'cij (Y3 (13 -5 a) 1 0 c (0.) > a V7 0 -0 I I • LL ' 0 . ° E CU (13 1 >'- 4CC b0 -- ..-1-12 cc -2 I i -i-- s_ a) 0 ..-i--J D c 1-- tioCU Irt" Li-: in (13 M-1 LT) (.9 . 0 tX0 t10 °c.f. 4- 1 s,... L- L- : L- C 0 ft:, 4-8 _o •5 a) (3) I Li- 4- 4- ' 4- Z as i: ti) = •- tr) b.3 I to tin tIO : b.° 0 — 0 Cl_ 4 "(3 if) 00 CZ3 ! C C C C ) •-•..., S.- " 4_, ...... ..._ ...._ ._ ' t10 0 ro C c c c , c cu , c .- — cu -E a) CI) . 0 0 o ! 0 40 _c .,-,-.) t.) a.. , 71-3 a) _c u NJ NJ NJ NJ .0 4-' ' = (13 taD C > -Til, Ln n 'cr.) ›.- ›.- L.- ?. (7) ,-5, , 0 a .C g (4-a 5 C2- rt CD CD • CD ,,-, = , I x in C C C , C 0 0 0 4r3 ' 't7) .7 'Ln , 'L7i 6 • V •-!)3 Cl) -c - if) s-- n n = : = I- ' a) s- > .5 _c ,a) L`) a) -a Cl) —LI 7.) 73 : 7i -Y 6 43 cu — 0 t-J- .5 f-13 c , c c cc ir, 0 cc , u_I a_ — ' - • ' ' ' 7:joi•KtttttativgEs.;.=?:::N'.miT.mnt kr) ID) ri ..--..„ E 1:1117°'‘ -, Ili.• 1 t '-' & -It= Pt 4. 2 '4•- / - VI ) t. I I I /a C''eAt•?!..D iz,t.t ,,.,,,,,. ,ra lU111,1 82 -IF A ---, , _. I f, 0 «^.4 A ' :A."; '-'-'1..: :'..1 1.-.:.--* !, ! )1. I'm , .6 LOA ■ -,ii Z • „ . I--' 5- • ' vi U Ilie = 111 lail 0 1A4 ce i I . ..1 I th 0 0-, CC 0 ct I-flit I ' .....-.. ...I ed: = . a. 4 n: iillitljj '- - ‘#1' 4111, LI 1 ill (N Ln 6 a. --- -,. 4..., 0 a,t t..10 ro L... at •... 0 .- ' „,.......„ 0) cu -vo :- — -- •... . P a..... C 0 "§7 E :"'”. ''' ' ''''` ..... ,.... — 73 ....._. 2 0 LL, ro ; 1/1 Z c c,,,,, o a) .:,,. I o rt) 0 LL Lts 0 1-1 Q) —C3 0 c rt) co CD u-t ID in. 0 (0 al tv ki•A ft: > %... oo at am -0,11 o e4 __ 0 in 0 CJ . WI .— „..... D -1-- . a Li c c 4-1 cy .— co no at 2 cu 4_, 0 IA (r) •••••1 th C co •- 4 cc „.......... 0 w rC 1.1.1 (3) 0 0 --) E ,,,■••••„ in U 0 0. 3 Q.) 0 CO CL) 1:2- 1 cl 0 L. 0 IV ) (13 (,) LU rII 11111•11 0 L.L., In C 0 0 00 Q.) 0 Cre 0,) • L 0 , VI (13 CD - I ...J '''. , Lr$ I I rii 00 r- ci° v-i 1 .2 An. a, 1 rt) cu rn 1 +0 Lf1 it-i 111. w rsi -ch- > IV ILI Ln CDs 0 h.. a) 0 10) V) 44.7; tin. Oa 47; ■ 4 x—i < if). , ta. 0 - 0. 0 0 I a) 4._ Li; r vi .... a. u o 0 ....1 at •..... _ 0 E a. tl) *- co -• 1 .11.1 Cl. U > u. 11111 c, o 1 0 Li. UJ V') 0 cs. — LI1 Liu CIJ = < en > LA CU Z at (si") +0 01 4.0 a j co 4-• „. ro zfh; , co {A ,..--., 2015 BCC :oilier County Affordable Housing Advisory Com nittee Com liunity and Human Services Division 2015 INCENTIVE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION REPORT STATE HOUSING INITIATIVLJ reiri p-.. DECEMBER 8r 2015 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report Rewired to be Reviewed per Fl Statute 420.9076(4) and ReicQmmended for Adoption at 12/8/2015 BCC Meeting (without enhancements) Pale Expedited Permitting-The processing of approvals of development orders or permits,as defined in Sec. 163.3164(7)and 4 8),F.S.for affordable housing projects is expedited to a greater degree than other projects(See Senate Bill 2011 —SB 176 Impact Fee Waivers or Modifications—The modification of impact-fee requirements,including reduction or waiver of fees 4 and alternative methods of fee payment for affordable housing Density Flexibility—The allowance of flexibility in densities for affordable housing 5 Parking and Setbacks-The reduction of parking and setback requirements for affordable housing 5 Flexible Lot Configurations—The allowance of flexible lot configurations,including zero-lot-line,for affordable housing 5 Street Requirements—The modification of street requirements for affordable housing 6 Oversight(Ongoing)—The establishment of a process by which a local government considers,before adoption,policies, 6 procedures,ordinances,regulations,or plan provisions that increase the cost of housin. Land Bank Inventory—The preparation of a printed inventory of locally owned public lands suitable for affordable housing 6 Proximity-The support of development near transportation hubs and major employment centers and mixed-use 6 developments activit centers and densi bands Reservation of Infrastructure—The reservation of infrastructure capacity for housing for very-low income persons,low 7 income .ersons,and moderate income 'ersons Accessory Dwelling Units-The allowance of affordable residential units in residential zoning districts 7 Additional Items to be Considered at 2016 Pro •osed Works ho • Goal: More units and Preserve Units NEW—Additional Incentives for Elderly Housing Units 8 NEW—Require a certain level of affordable housing in all new developments that previously would have been 8 covered under Development of Regional Impact(DRI)regulations NEW: Preservation of Existing Affordable Housing—The establishment of efforts to preserve or elongate timeframes for 8 units designated as affordable in order to reduce the need for additional units to come on-line NEW—Sustain levels of affordable housing in existing CRA's 8 NEW-Sustain levels of mobile home housing 9 NEW—Transfer Development Rights(TDR)for affordable workforce housing 9 NEW—Assist all essential services personnel by reducing non-housing costs 9 NEW-Reservation of Infrastructure—The reservation of infrastructure capacity for housing for very-low income persons, 9 low income persons,and moderate income persons;utilize TCMAITCEA mitigation opportunities to further AH objectives NEW—Inclusionary Zoning—require a certain percentage of affordable workforce housing with all new residential 10 developments,with mitigation options NEW—Micro Housing—Create local development codes to suit small single family units 10 Goal: Less Development Cost NEW(revisited)-Utilize Funding from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund(AHTF)to defray development costs for 10 affordable workforce housing , t\*Some incentives are recommended for expansion. The expansion will be discussed at the workshop. At this meeting,only re-adopting what is currently in place. 2 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report ^ Additional Items to be Considered at 2016 Pro•osed Worksho• Options to Develop Steady Revenue Source(s) for Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be Considered at Workshop NEW: Impact Fees for AH—Designate a specific impact fee for use towards affordable housing initiatives for 11 residential and commercial development,intended to be in an amount similar to a jail or library impact fee NEW—Dedicate funding annually to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund,or generate by other means 11 NEW: Linkage Fees—Fees paid by new commercial businesses based on their specific need for generation of new 11 affordable housing NEW—Target County grant funds toward the development or preservation of affordable housing as a high 11 priority NEW-Fees paid"in lieu of"related to inclusionary zoning option 10 3 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report --1- a) Incentive Description Incentives and AHAC Recommendation AHAC Review Comments a Required to be Reviewed: Existing and Recommended for Adoption at 12/8/2015 BCC Meeting without enhancements A Y Expedited Permitting— In accordance with F.S.553.791(7)(9),no more than Maintain current incentive,plus NEW The processing of 30 business days after receipt of a permit application, approvals of the local building official shall issue the requested (1) Expand scope of program to include expedited development orders or permit or provide a written notice to the permit review for multi-family,senior housing,and permits,as defined in applicant identifying the specific plan features that do Medicaid assisted housing permits using state Sec. 163.3164(7)and not comply with the applicable codes,as well as the or federal funds receive the same 15 business (8), F.S.for affordable specific code chapters and sections. day priority within the existing approved Growth housing projects is Management Department procedures. expedited to a greater In 2010,the Growth Management Department refined degree than other the building permit process and performance projects(See Senate Bill measures,developing an expedited review procedure 2011 —SB 176) for all building permits,not to exceed 5 business days for one and two family dwelling permits,or 15 business days for any commercial permit application. In 2012 the Board approved a staff augmentation contract with a private provider to assist building division staff during times of elevated permitting requests.As a result of this updated process and a staffing contract,all development projects are given priority and developers in the community are aware of the permit volume and review times through public meetings. The committee concluded that the current Expedited Permitting process is sufficient and is adequately expediting the review of development orders and permits for affordable housing projects. A Y Impact Fee Waivers or Individuals or organizations constructing new Maintain Current Incentive plus NEW: Modifications—The affordable housing units to benefit very low-and low- (1) Explore options to establish a funding source. modification of impact- income persons and households are eligible for the Such fund may be used for future deferred impact fee requirements, deferral of impact fees per LDC Sec 74-401. fees for owner occupied dwelling units. including reduction or (2) Extend future impact deferral to include Multi- waiver of fees and Collier County Resolution No.2008-97,provided family,senior housing, and Medicaid assisted alternative methods of Board of County Commissioner direction on housing. fee payment for restricting the use of the remaining funds for deferral (3) Explore options to be able to retain existing AH affordable housing of County Impact Fee for single family homeowners units to prevent a decrease of AH units over time by who occupied affordable housing units.The County renewing or extending incentives, in exchange for had suspended the program for use with single family the AH unit remain affordable under the development. On June 23,2015 the BCC accepted a requirements and obligations of AH agreements. recommendation to reinstate the impact fee deferral (4) Consider an impact fee reduction based on program for single family residences,so it is now locality of activity centers;must be accompanied by available for single and multi family residences. determination of a funding source to cover the reduction (5) Consider increasing the length of the deferral (currently 10 years)to maintain affordability of units for a longer period of time Implementation Requires: Further study and analysis to develop firm parameters, followed by LDC and ordinance changes. 4 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report Required to be Reviewed: Existing and Recommended for Adoption at 12/8/2015 BCC Meeting without enhancements A Y Density Flexibility— The developer may request increased density when Maintain current incentive plus NEW: The allowance of including a affordable housing in the proposed flexibility in densities for development via the Affordable Housing Density (1) Find a way for this to be coupled with the density affordable housing Bonus Program,codified by Ordinance No.04-41,as bands to incent more affordable housing in the Land Development Code(LDC)2.06.00 et seq,which density bands density bonus can only be granted by the Commission and utilized by the Developer in accordance with the strict limitations and applicability Implementation Requires: Further study and of said provisions. analysis to develop firm parameters, followed by LDC changes. The County currently has processes and procedures that allow for the Developers to have additional input and feedback for projects, early in the process, including a NIM meeting to allow for public contribution and involvement,to be able to address possible issues and/or concerns.This increases certainty of the outcome. A Y Parking and Setbacks— The county has several procedures in place whereby Maintain current incentive The reduction of parking developers may request reduction of parking and and setback setback requirements for all uses,including affordable requirements for housing. affordable housing In the case of redevelopment projects,deviations are allowed when applied through the site development plan(SDP)review. For projects that use a rezone process such as a Planned Unit Development(PUD), deviations are allowed as part of that process. In addition,there are special deviations allowed within the Immokalee Urban area that both reduce parking and setbacks, many of which are administrative. Besides the deviation process,certain variances allowed. Staff has the ability to apply administrative variances to certain thresholds and above staff thresholds the standard variance process is available. The County currently has an interim deviation available for lmmokalee. A Y Flexible Lot Zero lot configuration allowed as use in PUD's and as Maintain current incentive Configurations—The Conditional Use elsewhere per 4.02.04 of the LDC allowance of flexible lot under cluster housing. configurations,including zero-lot-line configurations for affordable housing 5 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report —`' Required to be Reviewed: Existing, and Recommended for Adoption at 12/8/2015 BCC Meeting without enhancements A Y Street Requirements— Street requirements for affordable housing are Maintain current incentive The modification of street considered as deviations in the PUD approval requirements for process and variances in the conventional zoning affordable housing process,on a case by case basis. Cross-section widths can be modified by the County Engineer administratively per 6.06.01.N of the LDC. A Y Oversight(Ongoing)— An ongoing process for review of local policies, Maintain current incentive,plus NEW The establishment of a ordinances,regulations and plan provisions that process by which a local increase the cost of housing prior to their adoption is government considers, in place. Collier County requires all items which have before adoption,policies, the potential to increase the cost of housing to be (1) On a case by case basis add a Fiscal Impact to procedures,ordinances, prepared and presented to the Collier County Board Affordable Housing section to specifically regulations,or plan of County Commissioners with the amount of the discuss impact of cost on affordable housing provisions that increase increase or decrease mentioned in the executive the cost of housing summary under fiscal impact. The County regularly utilizes the existing entities and processes undertaken by the AHAC,the Planning Commission,the Development Services Advisory Committee to review and examine impacts to the cost of housing. A Y Land Bank Inventory— Florida Statute 125.379, Disposition of County Maintain current incentive plus NEW: The preparation of a property for affordable housing, requires the printed inventory of preparation of a printed inventory of locally owned (1) Broadening this to other public entities such as locally owned public public lands suitable for affordable housing. Collier the school system,the City of Naples and the City of lands suitable for County has completed this process and maintains a Marco Island affordable housing list of locally owned properties. (2) Utilize the funds in the affordable housing trust fund to consider purchase land suitable for Resolution 2007-172 and Resolution 2010-123 affordable housing. directs the use of surplus land and directs those funds derived from the sale of such property be placed in Implementation requires: Confirmation of other the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. jurisdictions to participate,revision of Resolution to revise uses of funds in the Affordable Housing Trust Fund A Y Proximity—The support The County currently addresses this incentive through Maintain current incentive plus NEW: of development near additional density offered in designated density bands transportation hubs and and activity centers. It is noted that while this exists, (1) Recommend further incentives to develop AH major employment the development community has not advantaged this units in specific locations throughout the County centers and mixed-use for affordable housing. that are located within Activity Centers and developments(activity Density Bands.(mention of less impact to centers and density infrastructure,transportation...) bands) (2) Possibly layer more incentives into these areas (3) Bolster the AHDB program in these areas (4) Consider these incentives for those up to 120% AMI with greater incentive levels for lower than 80%AMI (5) Review compatibility of design to provide further assurances to the Development Community Implementation Requires: Further study and analysis to develop firm parameters, followed by LDC changes. 6 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report —' Required to be Reviewed: Not In Use Not Recommended for Adoption at 12/8/2015 BCC Meeting N Reservation of Not a current incentive. Do not adopt. See Additional Items for a Infrastructure–The Potential Expansion. reservation of infrastructure capacity for housing for very-low income persons,low income persons,and moderate income persons N Accessory Dwelling Not a current incentive. Maintain current quest house code,only Units-The allowance of affordable residential The use of these units,sometimes referred to as units in residential zoning mother-in-law suites,already exists in the code under districts the term"guest cottage". Deterrents include: Increases full time dwelling units not included in density calculations(potentially doubles density in neighborhoods),adds additional impacts on infrastructure not previously allocated for this additional density,rental units are regulated and thus would increase regulatory costs to monitor, regulatory fees associated with dwelling units have not been collected(i.e.: impact fees). The committee views this as having a low impact in return for the effort to allow these additional dwelling units that have not been planned for in the greater community planning efforts that support our current community. 7 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report Additional Items to be Considered at 2016 Proposed Workshop Goal: More Units and Preserve Units N NEW—Additional The committee discussed several possible options for NEW Incentives for Elderly new incentives in this arena. (1) Any developer targeting 55 and over,gets Housing Units additional density for affordable units or possibly reduced or deferred impact fees (2) At senior living facilities,any request for additional beds above the base.45 FAR would require a certain percentage of affordable beds Implementation Requires: Further study and analysis to develop firm parameters, followed by GMP and LDC changes. N NEW—Require a The committee discussed the Rural Lands West NEW certain level of development currently underway as an example of a affordable housing in large volume of housing stock being developed with (1) The committee recommends further study and all new developments no current plans for affordable housing. analysis that previously would have been covered With the changes to the DRI(Developments of Implementation Requires: Further study and under Development of Regional Impact)regulations at the state level,some analysis to develop methods and options,followed Regional Impact(DRI) large projects will not have to address the housing by creation of an implementation plan. regulations issues previously required by state DRI review. The committee discussed the need to assure that affordable housing is a required component of all large projects. N NEW: Preservation of Most owned units designated as affordable have up NEW Existing Affordable to a 15 year affordability period. This is Housing—The recommended to be maintained. (1) Extend the period of affordability to 30 years for establishment of efforts all new affordable rental to preserve or elongate This could take on the form of extending the term of (2) Extend the term of impact fee deferrals beyond timeframes for units affordability for future rental units beyond the typical the 10 years if the unit remains affordable,and designated as affordable 15 years to a 30 year term. pay the impact fee from the affordable housing in order to reduce the trust fund need for additional units This could also take on the form of funds or programs (3) Direct funds from the AHTF to pay for to come on-line to rehabilitate or otherwise develop affordable rehabilitation of existing affordable housing housing already in the housing stock. stock Implementation Requires: Further study and analysis to develop firm parameters, followed by GMP and LDC changes. N NEW—Sustain levels The committee discussed the potential to partner with NEW of affordable housing the CRA's on redevelopment in order to avoid in existing CRA's displacement of affordable housing. (1) Find ways to partner with the CRA's to incentivize more affordable workforce housing in the CRA's (2) Consider leveraging of future TIF funds with other available funding sources such as grants or the affordable housing trust fund Implementation Requires: Further study and analysis to develop methods and options, followed by creation of an implementation plan. 8 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report Additional Items to be Considered at 2016 Proposed Workshop Goal: More Units and Preserve Units N NEW-Sustain levels of The committee also discussed the issue of mobile NEW mobile home housing homes in our community as a viable source of affordable housing,and the need for a method to (1) Support existing work to find ways to support allow replacement units and other upgrades under the redevelopment and/or replacement of sub- current code. It is the committees understanding that standard mobile home housing in the the Growth Management Department is currently community;specifically to establish a set of pursuing such alternatives. standards to enhance or support mobile home preservation. N NEW—Transfer The committee discussed the option to provide for NEW Development Rights enhanced Transfer Development Rights when (TDR)for affordable affordable housing in general or specifically for the (1) The committee recommends the County pursue workforce housing elderly is to be constructed. One option may be to further study to develop a rationally supported allow for additional units for the same price,if the basis for enhanced TDR's for the purpose of additional units are affordable. affordable workforce housing. Specifically a tiered scale is recommended similar to that in the affordable housing density bonus program. Implementation Requires: Further study and analysis to develop firm parameters, followed by implementation. N NEW—Assist all The committee discussed that those employed as NEW essential services essential services personnel in the community are the personnel by reducing target market for the affordable workforce housing. (1) During the approval process for new non-housing costs Many employers currently provide some form of construction where essential services personnel subsidy such as supplying affordable housing, will be employed,require a form of subsidy from subsidizing day care,paying a portion of the employer. transportation costs. Implementation Requires: Further study and analysis to develop firm parameters, followed by approval. N NEW-Reservation of NEW Infrastructure—The The committee identified an opportunity to link reservation of affordable housing to transportation concurrency (1) As such developments come through the infrastructure capacity for exception and management areas(TCMA and process,seek mitigation strategies that further housing for very-low TCEA). For example,if there is a failed road system the objectives of providing housing that is income persons,low based on the concurrency review,the affordable to the residents of the County. income persons,and applicant/developer may mitigate such failure by moderate income taking action that positively impacts the cost of persons;utilize affordable housing or defrays others costs incurred. Implementation requires: Staff and planning TCMAITCEA mitigation Such options may include an employer providing bus commission working with applicants to identify opportunities to further passes to employees,for example. valuable and palatable options to present to the AH objectives Board. 9 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report Additional Items to be Considered at 2016 Proposed Workshop Goal: More Units and Preserve Units N NEW—Inclusionary The committee and the community are split on this NEW Zoning—require a option. Most would only consider this if there were certain percentage of also an"in lieu of'option such as a payment to the (1) Prior to making a determination,study the affordable workforce affordable housing trust fund,or an option to build economic impact of placement or mitigation of housing with all new units in another location. Others felt this was the only affordable units to determine whether benefits residential way to ensure affordable workforce units are built. are substantial enough to warrant developments,with implementation and administration. mitigation options After further discussion,the committee recommends (2) Consider this for encouragement of GAP this option be further studied for its'financial and housing(80-150%AMI) economic impact to determine real benefit. It is recognized that there is only a small percentage of land still available for building in the County,and If considered,Implementation Requires: Further there is concern over inappropriate concentration as study and analysis to develop economic impact as an outcome. well as firm parameters,possibly followed by GMP and LDC changes. The committee discussed the option to add an additional requirement to require inclusionary zoning in density bands and activity centers. N NEW—Micro Housing— The committee sees the appeal of this option,though NEW Create local it raises significant concerns in terms of impact to the development codes to infrastructure of the community. Significant research (1) Study full impact and effects of allowing for suit small single family and work would be required to assess all changes in smaller units,including but not limited to LDC units current codes,fees,etc.even to assess feasibility. and GMP impacts,impact fee impacts,and future land use element impacts. This type of housing could suit young professionals, seasonal workers,and possibly young couples with Implementation Requires: Further study and no children. analysis to develop firm parameters, followed by GMP and LDC changes. Goal: Less Development Cost Y NEW(revisited)-Utilize Per Resolution 2007-203,the County does have an NEW Funding from the affordable housing trust fund(AHTF)that could be Affordable Housing modified to recognize various revenue streams. The (1) Once funding sources are determined,bring Trust Fund(AHTF)to Resolution provides for uses of the funds for Down forth a revised resolution that specifies funding defray development Payment assistance, Impact Fee Relief,Land sources and uses of the funds for BCC approval costs for affordable Acquisition,Construction Loans, Community Land and implementation. workforce housing Trust,Homebuyer Education and Counseling, Disaster Recovery and Mitigation,and administration. The committee views the funds available in the AHTF as a key ongoing element to sustain and further develop affordable workforce units in the County. 10 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report If Options to Develop Steady Revenue Source(s) for Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be Considered at 2016 Proposed Workshop N NEW: Impact Fees for The committee considered the topic of an Impact Fee NEW AH—Designate a for the express purpose of funding affordable housing specific impact fee for in Collier County. The committee,after receiving (1) The committee recommends the County pursue use towards affordable public input,considers this a viable option to address the requisite study to develop a rationally housing initiatives for the on-going issue of meeting affordable workforce supported impact fee for the purpose of residential and housing needs in our community. affordable workforce housing. It is recognized commercial this may be a lengthy process, but if adopted development,intended to The overall goal is to establish a reliable,locally could provide a long term and flexible solution be in an amount similar managed,funding source for use to incent or develop to the County to a jail or library impact affordable workforce housing. The concept is to fee spread out the economic impact for affordable housing such that everyone pays a small amount Implementation Requires: Further study and rather than some[developers]paying larger amounts analysis to develop firm parameters, followed by that may result if other incentives or programs were adoption of the new impact fee. implemented. One appeal of this approach is that the local government maintains control over spending plans and therefore can be responsive to the current market and other economic conditions. Impact fee revenue would be placed in the affordable housing trust fund and disbursed according to a BCC approved plan of action. N NEW—Dedicate Not a current incentive,though via Resolution 2007- NEW funding annually to the 203,the County does have an affordable housing Affordable Housing trust fund(AHTF). (1) The committee,after receiving public input, Trust Fund,or generate recommends pursuit of this option. The public by other means The essence of this concept is to develop funding reaction to date was very strong in favor of this streams for a dedicated fund with a local plan to fund option. affordable workforce housing in some manner. Mitigation buyouts of other required incentives is one Implementation Requires: Further study and optional revenue stream;general funding is one, analysis to develop methods and options,followed impact fees dedicated to affordable housing is by creation of an implementation plan. another,increase or additional tourist tax is a consideration;others can be developed. The local government would establish rules and regulations as to how the funding may be collected and allocation. Some of the advantages are that this becomes all local decision making and therefore can be market and economic flexible. N NEW: Linkage Fees— As the County continues its efforts to recruit new NEW Fees paid by new businesses,it could consider a linkage fee whereby commercial businesses an assessment for each business would be made (1) Consider development of an affordable housing based on their specific based on the number of affordable units their linkage fee. need for generation of workforce would need. new affordable housing Implementation Requires: Further study and This has the effect of employers having a part in the analysis to develop firm parameters, followed by solution set. adoption of the new impact fee. 11 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report —.` Options to Develop Steady Revenue Source(s) for Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be Considered at 2016 Proposed Workshop N NEW—Target County The committee recognizes the County receives and NEW grant funds toward the distributes between$2M and$3M annually in development or entitlement funding. The CHS staff is presently (1) The committee recommends that affordable preservation of beginning the planning process to develop a five year housing be identified as a high priority in the affordable housing as a plan for allocation priorities. plan,as long as the planning process supports high priority this. (2) Consider specifying a percentage of grant funds to be allocated for affordable workforce housing Implementation Requires: Input to the planning process showing the needs in the community, and eventual BCC approval of the plan and priorities in May or June 2016. 12 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report Not considered viable in, or applicable to our community at this time N NEW—Discounted AH Not a current incentive. Do not activate an incentive GAP Impact Fees and a GAP Housing Trust The committee considered the topic of a Discounted The committee,after receiving public input,does not Fund Affordable Housing(GAP)Impact Fees and a GAP recommend this incentive option. The public Housing Fund for the purpose of assuring additional reaction to date is a lack of interest or uncertainty Gap affordable housing is constructed in Collier about the potential for this option. County. The essence of this concept is to tax higher end real estate transactions,only,and use that revenue to backfill the required impact fees;thereby reducing the impact fee and increasing the profit to the Gap housing developer. 13 v. G o Q 0, m m NTY ¢ ,; ° on to BROWARD COUNTY t' a6 e o n c. \ —` .-- _.*_- HO i L.,___DADE N T, ✓• O a O ¢ o . 2.. ^ m • F V w Nd " Z 1j ; ; ; s m d• d u ,u u a g • p 3 w d ,y E cc • D L 'W • � 3 ,.rs nr a y= ^a >c E 8 J • G c E > a doO1 0 3 d u r^ ,�c, g '^ ooa = • a ^ ,,- 0 N o a ° ° . • z a° z E � § § § § z 0 0 - o S •0 z R ' § � _ • W e gg88SSS C.) o. 58888 r-,°. N N N H N N N 0 a/ -' 8S2 1r10 71.111116 , a • IX I inn W .W ez as --�,4 .-,. F 0 W `S. r Z x } W 3 �Y t �``�. � a c,. z s i J W Yo _ ''I/V:.•'y .M —- :, . Ox, fi° :iklet ' . _.• ..... 4, "• 14-, 7N°j LL [ 4 ° Q 1..,. It..fr. 4. .'11 ---'„top ' r O N 6 6 41,—...4... K Z Efl ER Efl 69 J WV. _ ' `� 6) '4.'4, O O O O 0 _•,,.� ii (' O O O O O •4.'' c. if 69 64 EA 64 E9 69 '• CO m a r z d OF Me Gya o z v p 1111 °� 3 CD a. a=w R M Q 4.2 y 0 icc p i,` Pg. 1 O O O O , 0 0 0 0 V U¢ O 8 O 8 ¢d O N t O� ��� O fA 1.2.' fA 69 f_,. I.. d o + w 7 O Log)",,,"----I Z ,Iii O O O O O O N I O O O 6 O O o O O O z 11111 : P Q)a SR 29 i) w ; II _ \ r. i nZ µ 0 j o re :1.[.._ W zi h w/ g I r, , F- Z 0 _,,..,.. ... .„ o, .. 7 ca L,..) it kl`=' r,) a" '! J 2 I a 9aaiT oo, _. .ggtt( 7► 1! y J • , r l�_ 'W a g m 0 Itt✓ �' ° gi � T d m M O m O O Fs; m ¢ � `m ;i GL;11 ~ � O U o CU rn Z IF92JOHSAV9 ' • A t U ti ` U .6' H o H ,_ y Z — r F C.F vEXtc0 0 y O u GUL E m 2 LL m co 01 co N M .9 O a 2 w' ommmo3p v G C• Q O C N Q N V1 a0., V U N _ m 0 N a a QQS� Q o it m 25 Y 25 25 8 8 8 8 _ . O Q N N N W a .t + c v z' ?'" g 88888 ~ 5 m 2088888 B Pg. 2 ■ NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PER PRICE IN COLLIER COUNTY ( EAST NAPLES CIVIC ASSOCIATION BOUNDARY) 1 i a j GOLDEN GATE BLVD W ' CC I { ! Z O ) 4 0 D: !) Co z • PINE RID,.E RD . PINE-IDGE RD EXT 0 us { us Z GREEN BLVD K o A r? 111 tu m z Number of Dwelling Units Per Price in Collier County i(Based on Property Appraiser's Office data as of 12/4/15) E.-11 t ' It EAST NAPLES CIVIC ASSOCIATION BOUNDARY . 1 _ t� y� �L„„„�, * Property Value #of Single Family #of Condos #of Mobile Homes 7 �a, _ 3�n :7 1:j $0-$100,000 1,614 8,688 4,803 , . , r �. - lw� mot $101,000-$200,000 4,263 10,506 286 "8z -j�4►_–rt $201,000-$300,000 5,099 2,828 35 - {_. IT'r K $301,000-$400,000 2,627 719 0 'I� $401,000-$500,000 1,138 192 0 _ V I !y� A� $SOI,DDDo 1,921 11D 1 I ` LL c DDL"”, ti Total 16,662 23,043 5,124•`i, p_fe.-n"'irn ice rf : �: /(Data Source:Property Appraiser database.Excludes Apartment and cooperative units) It* \ \1 '' '4?-c.', /11"I'k.,-- 1 1 -. 411 i # I. I East Naples Civic Association Boundary z C ®S;m T � In HOMASSON N RATTLE K V Pr, R j r ,, . \`,'.' r �V„,,,%.4°N,,-,_,s, _ . t. °. () * ” I ,1 SABAL PALM RD .--.,.®_.—.,.,. _wr_____ .,...f:07:, 6 { % 1,-,11-4,W x:4;:, -41)ittela S . f VA , , a ...•de- IeiYa f I ■E T. .i I T .;.. , (. MANATEE RD 4 , r..' _1 -` Niviot 11!ip i?, . I. f��06 ■d, Lu ‘, T i Nr N. a -, —��. Property Value: t, Z so-sins= � ,A j,� $,00,00,-$200,000 � o IN$200,001-$300,000 \1- ( ,-1...,S I ME $300,001-$400,000 { tm ® $400,001-$500,000 �` 1,N, ,,, �( ® $500,001+ -A `SAN MARL°,O Pfl 1 r.-�;� 0 1 2 4 ig 1 � —.r - G Miles ,C.-,-, '3IS MAPPING BETH ENT D PAR ( / ire.f9-4 ---4,t E 3RON/rH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT � \ VVV 7ATE DEC 4,2015 I Pg.3 Z -o U F S U U h w E F h a w S N U h U w tx o— N R p 6 7,o ¢ o w9 _ Fi Z a W _W 7 ,1 Q Q w r _ J a Z Z S "°° y Z w a F N Z 7 O ¢v r O O ry miom r ro K W o ^ e a 7 9 i'' s t. • - O _ a O y �F. • t O Kod i9 co Z �m � �O s N N to =FA p W m i' ce rn u ~ o 0 0 o O Z ~ ? N r o u Z G G G G ¢ _ • VS11Nf1 °— N - NNNo co O Ce O Z Z O b Z J N • • ••ti J •f W • • • • • ■ G u' Z — • f• AZ as J U N� \1 ` a • O gl, _ o , ��• W CO N 6Z NSA, • ,< Z aw //r v / W y! • / � W �,3 ,_,_ .s,,,- "'STi ^`Y J W i *_ A__--—"W J OA 9, ..1`J-a3n3 / ■ • • ..^^ �Oa 33lVNOWWI _! A __1 • O •� • es Cs • j Ce N j, ��f '� ,/ ; N © { •fi ar • �QS as''S SO. ' t�1 '-A / CI V © T / OU Z as niea3aNVn W J n. a z Pg. 4 i 2015 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS UNDER $ 126 , 000 ( EAST NAPLES ) - t N 11 a GOLDEN GATE BLVD W^ J — 01 i- II a ce t ¢1 PINE RID ER^ D �) _ PINE IDGERDEIT ..„'TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 15,703 Z �� � f SINGLE FAMILY: 3,014 m w• JI z GREEN BLVD r o MULTI-FAMILY: 12,689 f7 wt �...I �• 0 �I �I m• (Data Source:Property Appraisesr Database) 7 I m m •GOLDEN,-ATE PK k .. w Illp • 1 • t • YIN • -V M RADIO RD • I-76 jll • t...w • ' •DA • SO • j f DAVIS BLVD ~ \ pews*r•,••• •• X • I 1 �9• „jt 1 ILLi . . , % .• . m g A It • Is A ,' N.KE A -.• r• � 1 • ••• • lis SABAL PALM RD •V CH 1.41•x\ • • ••• �. • M •• • a •vsb T,q •MANTES RD/941/T•• is • • • • • • i• • 11/41111:"\C"-'2 • • T94 ,j,zF i I LER B I __L55 --- 1 X 1 k /-2---,,,ir , � ,t LEG END -:76 _.-% East Naples Residential Units<=$126,000 t \s. i-lid;'' a !excludes mobile homes) i s.;P a ,____,. _.,..e " Q East Naples Civic Association Boundary 4 I SAAN M O RD^� i� �,,.. \ -t 0 1 2 r \ Miles 4 /1 V-( \''',.), , --- crz_is n J . Pg. 5 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PER PRICE IN COLLIER COUNTY ( BCC DISTRICT 2 ) Number of Dwelling Units Per Price in Collier County (Based on Property Appraiser's Office data as of 1214/15) COMMISSION DISTRICT 2 Property Value #of Single Family #of Condos I #of Mobile Homes $0-$100,000 98 2,051 �957 $100,001-$200,000 1,171 8,490 1 $200,001-$300,000 4,467 4,280 0 $300,001-$400,000 3,195 2,479 0 BONITA BEACH RD $400,001-$500,000 1,831 1,971 0 _ $500,001+ 5,014 5,780 0 ;l i.�� i Total 15,776 _ 25,051 958 2n,�� +- (Data Source:Property Appraiser database.Excludes Apartment and cooperative units) 7` U6r` !i 2 QBCC District 2 Boundary Rol l. \ . '.' rV. s Ira '1 46 - 1 ..a J -vt• , 1/4,,,A. t- -. 'LIN- At , tp,. .,-.,k‘ , A.,., ,v-4,1 4t. IF. Wren 1".` t I I IGGINSASS fD a� � r�pm ,, ,,, later � Iv.. ,,....... 4,...,,,,..,,...:,,,,,,,, ,,,....) ,r_i ,ii, •,, .... , i ....._, ;.),. ,,,,,,,„ 0,-21= 1 up, t /1 gli 2p i a� 111T E N wtMM®I ; D T II; dl j i mill IIITS-11 I '''...„..ziy.32;, irmlt"M...:::Y.g::. -r - �...is. � 1)) 0 L „rn i 'Off! `. '' 124t,n.toal kl. IPSA .1 T, ,...240L `1 ' 1 j......1, .. AkukrtBa3-'62.-e-IP.im an PI #dj44 C9ir Z ' %3121 etll 1 r a tc I) ;,11 ...... Aar i / l'.1 la 0 I. wi,,,,, MA Property Value: %• 1,t .0 = 4 r 11�r [ si Ili III $0-$100,000 � t ) - $100,001-$200,000 ' . PII)IE RII5Gt RD ° i ' 4 4 4■ mg$200,001-$300,000 t 1-, $300,001-$400,000 'rj Z1 I I' INN a $400,001-$500,000 a I Z tY� 0 1 III $500,001 + I j, Z I -- H I a I I- I� 0 05 1 2 I I 4 ,Mils I 0•� WI C7 i I G15 MAPPING.BETH YANG,AICP I Q I 0 -I 5 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT I I DATE DEC 4 2015 I 1 I I 1 ¢ i I1 pg. 6 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PER PRICE IN COLLIER COUNTY ( BCC DISTRICT 3 ) Number of Dwelling Units Per Price in Collier County ■ (Based on Property Appraiser's Office data as of 12/4/15) COMMISSION DISTRICT 3 Property Value #of Single Family #of Condos #of Mobile Homes $0-$100,000 306 3,085 2 $100,001-$200,000 4,728 7,974 1 $200,001-$300,000 3,639 2,532 0 $300,001-$400,000 3,010 565 0 $4$50(300:000011+-$500,000_ 1,980 97 0 '; 3 �' 2,780 154 0 = .v , /n, Total 16,443 � 14,407 � 3 • _t ":i- (Data Source:Property Appraiser database.Excludes Apartment and cooperadve units) � BCC District 3 Boundary .4:d.....,.,,i,........ .. . I` Fr -•, - Al.0.7' i �� 1 a� LI i - a� � il 1Wr � • -i:. tL! ' i •1 b '6 (1ir1lf� s fI` i 1 4 ( _ a r Zi cc— 1 it 1 a+r �' �� , i.„.., _ _z , ��1, 1Jri fl ' y* I zi->1 *, a laJJJ �- i - y' z i1 • J 11 I I II . aa _r In i _ aw e Z �J NDERBIL1 !-11 ! .� �f�� O R 111_.. II ✓�: I IP e1—.Y. J 1 `: i,',-' 7=-:' miI! n11 r�1Ii :II I I u, II s ■ 1, PI ''` 4-x-10 O .' III 1 .IFII I1 : GOLDEN GATE BLVD W i �.'" �I. I t 11 r ! `. - i illi i l �' 1'(' I i�1111�I1� PINEFIDGE R■ t i1 I I ,I I I i1111111:111111111 1 , co 1 /1I �� 'I 11I1 • 1 l I t —1111;1.11'— O to ■ I 11'1' H ' I p L 1 11'�+��� " 1i!�,dii i z t 1 1 I •.'�� �� �'�jj/fir I . I�l- •a g mufti 1111=' . I III 1 I ` a _ GOLDEN G A T ,1 f al,L: ��1151 i�t , _1gfl, N _ r� �� = Property Value: ‘114 > E.4,- ,. $o-$100,000 �' aa., �� RADIO RD a ' = _ $100,001-$200,000 i 1I. W 1 -$200,001-$300,000 S -$300,001-$400,000 I' I�� t $400,001-$500,000 DAVIS BLVD IVY• � �1` $500,001+ ` n 0 0.5 1 2 se % ,1 Miles GIS MAPPING:BETH YANG,AICP ' GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT I _ a DATE DEC.4,2015 If I Pg.7 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PER PRICE IN COLLIER COUNTY ( BCC DISTRICT 4) \ N., I \, �.E 41 Imo`. Number of Dwelling Units Per Price in Collier County I (Based on Property Appraiser's Office data as of 12/4/15) '""" COMMISSION DISTRICT 4 1 Property Value #of Single Family #of Condos #of Mobile Homes $0-$100,000 658 4,136 1,907 Z j J $100,001-$200,000 2,678 9,483 9 i+ CC $200,001-$300,000 2,962 2,919 0 I- j $300,001-$400,000 1,891 1,877 I 0 Q $400,001-$500,000 741 1,031 I 0 $500,001+ 5,960 4,916 I 0 Total 14,890 24,362 I 1,916 I¢- (Data Source:Property Appraiser database.Excludes Apartment and cooperative unl to) I Q BCC District 4IBoundary it 4 I PINE RIDGE RD ill f• 1Tt l t 4111! Z:41 ' , '1' 1-it -ii-' 4 fterg NY, , dm,..... .1....,_,:. ; 31 It._ ,...z.,„\,„,„;;A, / ( ..wrisT T4,-F1 tP tikoi,r-----1 4' '' -6--, ' t_.__ ca i . 4 1 ..ia I; ,',1: 1 to , L_ Q. „.4 t.. i . map ,,.„, , , _,...., ic. 0 t -A-- .....alme. ( 1 *Mt& -." -.. .N � = � d, ' at sAh„ ,�.ro _ Ira. A A litre/Elk SW I , I , ' u`!".1 " prey e- 1'= j t 'l�fL+ Rp• ^.....161 ... rw, ,, a.... s N i I ^4�! �.-. _i!S a i$1)) t iRT Ott._ e=teal 3 YRL• q6a.i ..,. ill - - � al S. -•1 CC era + � Z sP i CC ■ ,fin l�.'n� �II I I •ry e )9 m iril�tt t%4U' a`,�1 (r �• t� ��9,I� I t = ���� �' .�.�s'' _ v isa ���` 01 �'c��t, `�s ro ‘��1I .ice �� .0 $itia TH' r �� ■ 1' (� �,r, a- RATTLES(�AKE HAM tvOC Property Value: ®i 11/ �► 11..- r v E $0 $100,000 '' c '� ,ti.fit ii®$100,001-$200,000 l .�,/ 7..iz ... -$200,001-$300,000 I� s • *00 PA*--, ! \ -$300,001-$400,000 G. \ T I. $400,001-$500,000 4 ' 9 IIIII $500,001 + r ti��T 0 05 1 2 Miles GiS MAPPING BETH YANG,AICP \ GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT \ �•, CATE DEC 4 201 \ Pg. 8 N a 0 0 0 0 0� 0 o o 00 00_ U) O O O O U¢ C) O i i i i t zE 3 cc O O o 0 0 3sE �/ > i» O o 0 0 0 xw o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N M R V mz tu . cu EA 6? 64 fA fR (fl ¢° N n N N 0 0 0 p Q. .. "„ N 5 o %_r G ,- N = a 2 o O `o O u se 1.a w a in A T 10 u (0 r- c CC I— a V n u: -9 a •-I .ti E c Z U a H G .-' an m 7 a 0 e a w r O a y z _lo o a O •C V N a N N « a' G LL V W a,a 2 —aao8f n °'n' ag °rj % m C 0 c rri n d ri N w J _ V 2' a o d a c J . a as a .a y o ° a ; 8 8 8 8 0 g .ac °o • 888 E T}§ N aR Vf h 6 2 Z 3 N L `" ' . . + F '�' ■ Zm a988888 0, W ° C' O § 8 roo 0 V A N ti N N V1 ■ IL 0 IX rg a N F:1 I- ° I / — v I 7 1 1 8 ! 6Z 8S J J gyp° U� _ bs 1 _) U. A w1 Y 4 1� L,�,'�gy L Z Q ,-r, _ e V _ . . is mi. ,:,, ...,, _ , e Pg. 9 COLLIER COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOUSING LOCATION MAP BY COMMISSION DISTRICTS IMMOKALEE INSET MAP ,...., LEGEND Lakes °`' ' �; <. j�yyt/ Tlmbe Rldg f I11"iiieeed ® AFFORDABLE HOUSING y v,,}� COMMISSION DISTRICT: d i► COMMSNR 1-J4LiiY°!1/.]w Ar:ernaaPOnG R. '�• °" 1 I DONNA FIALA(1) wb, J,1 WlllowerooR•PI GEORGIA HILLER(2) m ImmokalwSe H using w I I TOM HENNING(3) — >wv ST I CR846 MIPENNY TAYLOR(4) I I TIM NANCE(5) �& I zMai StreEt v11W9e'b' :•,•^. antin 0 1 2 4 6 5 14VO• Miles o S4r `c BONITABEAGH RE N.N.ResCarcR 8'eGh no■a;y z w Somerset Palm Sort=Arbor View �_ o oaweuRG 1.1117.song Club 75 el MERLE ALE i, IMNGHALEE RD _, RANDALL BLVD �� 'Bntta B a ISu er Lakes II o DEACH RD O ��6 cklBl'Mi sed Use o 5• or„ear Creek _ 3 GOLDEN GATE BLVD E a CYPress Glen 1 u St.AGA,DR 2 -;;_I (( PINE R E RD m II of v w Vfhistler's Green l 5 Bel vedera Apartments s 1 113 Housing Alternatives Of Sw Florida ®g J a ris Meadow La k COMMISSION Dt6TRICi APPROVED BUILT Tuscan Isle • Sandlebrook Village DISTRIRI 1,718 1,146 GeOfg W h & nm DLOEV GATE ��� D$TRICrl ,11 766 ,.s ItverA DISTRICr3 2,116 1,951 �a Vincent PUU DISTRIT4 1.434 1.410 1ii_ imm DISTRICTS aT° 3,546 2$13 — 1asmne " j co TOTAL 9,595 J,88J. b C0.11531 NwsTnlc Wind Ptne APts „4....1„, Santa Barbara L ndtng n Wild P res o NapSes W Nhtak r RD Habitat) L .s Lansing A+ I First Assembly PUDI ereer..re s. a_ s RATTLESNAKE R D C7 kes,WO°a"",I 55 0 6.1.1PInes 32 10 473 478 •a'_ Rockedge. R tat..al:ier Hausi^g Al.er..naf ves (College Pa 1.�KR LT, ma 204 3 210 110 I - .rv. 1.11 156 156 92• 92 175 0 216 16 `.n _ Oise.of 0.,Blvd) 100 0 O� 'CHar,e._s a._s cr o I George Washington.ver. me L..4 nKrD, Ne.4. F, 140• 176 o °Oa/kb 9 — = a 0006 100 .0 Me E o H eron ParIcApta 245 240 S 70-16L 9 593 7 637 (Dab Source'.Best available data from Growth Management Department 0 Public Services Department) Pg. 10 vailable Collier County Housing Inventory UNDER 200K as of January 31, 2016 Inventory 01/31/2016 Locations Count Condo Count Naples Beach 12 $0-$100K 37 North Naples 69 $100K-$150K 136 Central Naples 143 $150K-$200K 278 South Naples 153 451 East Naples 55 lmmokalee&Ave Maria 2 Marco 17 Inventory 01/31/2016 Locations Single Family Count Naples Beach 2 $0-$100K 40 North Naples 4 $100K-$150K 32 Central Naples 14 $150K-$200K 42 South Naples 31 114 East Naples 54 lmmokalee&Ave Maria 4 Marco 1 Total Inventory UNDER$200K 565 (Condo&Single Family) For purposes of these geographic boundaries,we utilize the USPS Zip Codes as follows: Legend Geographic Location USPS Zip Codes Naples Beach: 34102,34103,34108 North Naples: 34109,34110,34119 Central Naples: 34104,34105,34116 South Naples: 34112,34113 East Naples: 34114,34117,34120,34137 Marco: 34145,34140,34139,34138 lmmokalee&Ave Maria: 34142 Sources: NABOB (Naples)and MIAAOR(Marco) Pg.11 Workforce and Affordable Housing Programs and Results --Inclusionary Zoning Inclusionary housing (or zoning) refers to planning ordinances that require developers to "set aside" a portion of new housing construction as affordable to households at specified income levels. • What it does—Addresses housing gaps from inflated housing prices and requires a percent of housing be provided at affordable levels. • Positives— o Value of incentives is relative to the market o Addresses community workforce housing needs(i.e. ownership or rental) • Negatives— o Limits the burden to new residential development • Cities or Counties using—Boulder CO, Denver, Longmont CO, Montgomery County MD, Chicago, Davis CA, Petaluma CA, Burlington VT,and Chapel Hill, NC Success Stories using Inclusionary Zoning Boulder, CO The City of Boulder has a median household income of nearly$74,000 and a median home price of $500,000. Boulder citizens and government officials are striving to keep the highly desirable city of 94,673 residents from becoming exclusionary to all but the very affluent. The city has little vacant land available, and most future development will likely be redevelopment and mixed-use. The Boulder City Council aspires to make 10%of the housing stock permanently affordable (4,500 units) by 2011. It has already achieved just over 50%of its goal. In 2000, in response to rapidly raising housing costs and the ineffectiveness of the voluntary inclusionary housing program, Boulder passed a mandatory inclusionary housing ordinance. The new program required 20%of housing in new developments to be priced affordably for low-income households, which Boulder now defines as households earning less than 80%of the area median income. The comprehensive mandatory ordinance covers all residential developments regardless of size (with the exception of developments of a single lot with one owner and total floor area of less than 1,600 feet). Results-since passage in 2000, housing development in Boulder has continued and the city has constructed 380 affordable homes. The majorities of these are condominiums, but also include approximately a dozen townhomes and single-family homes. While market-rate units in the developments continue to sell for between $390,000 and $430,000,the affordable units are priced between $112,000 and $185,000. Ninety- eight percent of people who have moved into the affordable units already lived or worked in Boulder, and they include teachers, nurses and other service sector workers. The city has collected $1.5 million in fee-in- lieu payments from roughly 50 developments. These are deposited in an affordable housing fund, which has subsidized the creation of about 80 affordable units each year. Boulder has created nearly 400 affordable homes under an inclusionary zoning ordinance: 1 Workforce and Affordable Housing Programs and Results Boulder Ordinance kpplicability-All new residential developments (except condo conversions) Set-Aside- 20% Target Income Levels- Below 80%AMI Period of Affordability- Permanent Cost Offsets- None In Lieu Alternatives- Fee of$18,000 per unit or$75 multiplied by 20%of the total floor area of a market rate unit (per unit); half of affordable units may be built off-site; land dedication option Resale- Must be resold to an eligible household; resale price is the original affordable sales price plus an inflationary factor and some closing costs Denver, CO The City of Denver is home to 554,636 residents. It attracts nearly 10 million visitors who spend $2.3 billion each year. In the beginning of 2004,the median resale home price rose to $238,000, up from $200,000 in the spring of 2001 and $100,000 in 1990. A family needed to earn over$65,000 to afford the average home. To address the growing affordability crisis, in 2002, the City of Denver passed an inclusionary housing ordinance. Results-the ordinance—coupled with the rezoning of large-scale redevelopments and proactive planning for affordable housing—have resulted in the creation of 3,395 affordable homes in Denver. Longmont, CO Inclusionary program, Density Bonus up to 20%, expedited review process; relaxed development standards; fee waivers or deferrals, marketing assistance. Results-the inclusionary program has produced 978 units and fee in-lieu funds have helped to build 334 affordable homes. Montgomery County, MD (2011 Population:989,794) Montgomery County, Maryland was one of the first places to establish an Inclusionary housing program, and it is called the Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit(MPDU) program. Their policy has a mandatory 12.5%to 15% affordable set aside for new subdivisions or high-rises that will have 20 or more units. (Subdivisions not served by county water/sewer service are exempt.) Rental units are required to remain affordable for 99 years, and ownership units for 30 years. In both cases, "affordable" is defined as <_ 70%AMI. Developers get a density bonus as a cost off-set (up to 22%depending on number of affordable units produced). The county can excuse a project from building the affordable units if the developer can make a convincing case. The following alternative options are possible in such instances. These options are granted on a case by case basis: -The developer can transfer a piece of land to the county -The developer can construct the affordable units on another site within the county(subject to approval) - Or,the developer can pay a fee in-lieu of constructing the units. Results- Montgomery County has generated over 13,475 affordable units during the life of the program. (That breaks down to 9,442 for sale units and 4,033 rental units. 2 Workforce and Affordable Housing Programs and Results Results • 13,475 affordable units generated (1976—2012) • Affordable for 30 years ownership units, 99 years for rentals • Affordability thresholds: 5 70%AMI for rental and ownership units Chicago, IL Chicago adopted its inclusionary housing policy in 2003 and expanded it in 2007. In Chicago, residential projects of 10 or more units that receive some kind of government assistance must produce affordable units. (Developments that do not receive specific government assistance do not require an affordable housing set aside.) Developments built on land purchased from the city or that are subject to a density bonus or other zoning flexibility must set aside 10% of units as affordable. Developments receiving financial assistance such as tax increment financing (TIF) are required to do a 20% affordable set aside. Affordable units must remain affordable for 30 years. Projects targeted for the Chicago Community Land Trust must remain affordable for 99 years. The affordability threshold is set at_5 60%AMI for rentals and 5_ 100%AMI for ownership. Developers have the option to construct the affordable units themselves or pay a fee of$100,000 per unit, which supports city affordable housing programs. Since 2003, about 984 affordable units were generated with this program. Once the real estate market and economy get stronger,the program could generate as many as 1,000 affordable units per year. Davis, CA Davis, CA turned their inclusionary housing guidelines into mandatory law in 1990. Ownership projects of 5 or more units and rental projects of 5-19 units must make 25%of the units affordable. Rental projects of 20 or more require a 35%affordable set aside. These are among the highest required set asides in the country. Affordable rental units are intended to remain permanently affordable. Davis has an aggressive program that aims to create more options for low and very low income households. The target income bands are tiered; a smaller set aside is required if units will be made affordable to households in lower income bands. For rental units the target AMU range is 55.40 to 80%AMI; and 5_80%to 120%for ownership units. Developers get a 1-for-1 density bonus, so every affordable unit they produce earns then the right to a bonus market rate unit. Developers have the option to dedicate land to the city instead of building the affordable units (1 acre minimum required, with designated zoning and infrastructure standards). Or, they can also propose an alternate plan to meet the affordability goals, which subject to city approval. On a case by case basis,the City can allow the developer to pay a fee in lieu of constructing the affordable units in undue hardship or financial burden is demonstrated. The fee is $23,727 per affordable unit not constructed for downtown projects with less than 15 units. Results - Between 1990 and 2011,the policy has created 1,802 affordable units; and 976 of these are permanently affordable at very low and low-income rents. 3 Workforce and Affordable Housing Programs and Results Petaluma, CA Petaluma, CA's inclusionary zoning policy was adopted in 1984.They have exceeded their General Plan goal to provide 10-15%of all market rate units as affordable. Over the last fifteen years, 22.5%of new housing has been in the affordable range. The Petaluma policy requires a mandatory 15% affordable set aside for residential projects 5 units or more. Available cost offsets include: - Density bonuses (5%-35% depending on type of project and number of affordable units produced) - Fee in lieu ($2,400 to$22,500 based on project size) - Option to dedicate land to the city or nonprofit housing developer - Exemption/relaxation of growth controls that limit amount or pace of residential development Results -the policy has produced 1,336 units in the city. The affordability period is 30 years. For rental units "affordable" is defined at<_ 50%AMI. For ownership "affordable" is set at<_ 80%AMI. Burlington, VT Burlington, VT's inclusionary zoning policy includes a mandatory 15%to 25% affordable set aside (depending on target AMI)for projects 5 units or more. Incentives available include: - Density bonus (15%-25% depending on area density; PUDs not eligible) - Off-site construction (at city's discretion, must provide 50% more units) - Fee in lieu (at city's discretion, must provide 50% more units; $100,000/unit, indexed to inflation) - 50% Parking reduction (at city's discretion) 50% Impact fee reduction (at city's discretion, undiscounted fee is$2,500 per 1,000sf of living space) Units are to remain affordable for 99 years. For rental units,the affordability threshold is set at<_ 65%AMI. For ownership the threshold is set at <_ 75%AMI. Results- between 1990 and 2006, Burlington has created 200 affordable units. Chapel Hill, NC Chapel Hill's inclusionary zoning policy includes a mandatory 10% (if downtown), otherwise 15% affordable set aside for single or duplex-family projects of 5 units or more. Partial units equivalent will be handled via payment in lieu of that is calculated each year. Current year is $85,000/unit. Units are for low to moderate income families (less than 80%AMI), using 30%of their income for housing. Units remain affordable for 99 years. The Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance allows the Town Council or Planning Board, as applicable,to approve alternatives to on-site development of affordable housing if it can be demonstrated to the appropriate body (such as the Planning Board or the Town Council)that one of the following criteria is met: (1) The alternative provides an equivalent amount of affordable dwelling units in a way that the Planning Board or Town Council determines better achieves the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan than providing the units on-site; or (2) Providing on-site affordable dwelling units is not economically feasible and the alternative means of compliance: (a) Will further affordable housing opportunities in the Town to an equivalent or greater extent than constructing affordable dwelling units on-site and 4 Workforce and Affordable Housing Programs and Results (b) Will not cause the Town to incur any net cost as a result of the alternative means of compliance; or (3) It would be impossible to provide the units on-site because of Federal or state law. If the Planning Board or Town Council approves an alternative to development of on-site affordable housing, the ordinance provides the following four alternatives: (1) Land dedication; (2) Dedication of existing units; (3) Off-site construction; or (4) A payment-in-lieu of housing. Other Incentive Programs for Affordable Workforce and GAP Housing Impact Fees San Francisco Bay Area Cities and Counties Impact Fees for Affordable Housing— • Berkeley $20,000/ unit • Fremont $17.55 - $20.25/sq. ft. • San Carlos $18,554/ unit • Santa Rosa $1,137 - $1,911/sq. ft. • Walnut Creek $1.60- $15/sq. ft. • Mountain View $10/sq. ft. • Marin County $0 - $10/sq. ft. • Napa County $1,738/ unit Linkage Fees Communities with Commercial Linkage (bonus density; fee waivers) — • Vail, Aspen/Pitkin County, Telluride, CO, Park City, UT and Seattle, WA. o In Seattle, developers pay a fee per square foot in a range of$5 - $22 on any new residential or commercial buildings. The square foot assessment is based on the average housing price in the neighborhood to be built in. Results - $48.5 million dollars have been added to the Workforce Fund. In Lieu Alternatives: None. Communities with Residential Linkage (bonus density, fee waivers, expedited review, parking reduction, unit equivalency) • Telluride, CO and Jackson/Teton County, WY and Seattle, WA. 5 Workforce and Affordable Housing Programs and Results Jncentivize Existing Density Bands • Boston, MA Density Fee— o In Boston,there is a fee commercial developers pay into a city fund for the production of workforce housing. The fee applies to developers who choose not to build workforce housing on their market-rate site. Instead,they pay into the city's fund. The fee is $380k for each workforce unit the city requires. • Denver, CO Density Bonus of 10%— o $5,000 to $10,000 subsidy per unit (up to 50%of total units: parking reduction; expedited permit process. Results-of 2,840 units built, 940 (33.1%) were affordable (640 rented and 300 owner occupied). No fee in-lieu money was collected. TDR's an incentive for Affordable Housing • King County (Seattle), Palm Beach County (FL), and Portland, OR. In Portland, receiving sites can typically exceed base density by 50 percent. • Seattle's Program Results (since initial adoption in 2001) o 120 affordable units built o 564 affordable units preserved through transfer o $8,135,000 for Housing Fund • Chicago TDR Affordable Housing Program Results (since adoption in 2004) o 38 applicable projects o 34 affordable units built o $32,578,000 in fee-in-lieu payments (committed) o $5.7 million largest committed for single project o $9,198,000 in fee-in-lieu payments (received) Affordable Housing Trust Funds • Boulder, CO Affordable Housing Trust Fund— o Generates$1MM each year. Nonprofits, developers, individuals, neighborhood groups and the local housing authority are eligible to receive funds. 7.5MM generated annually. In Lieu Alternatives 1: 8/10th of one percent of property tax and a housing excise tax ($0.21 per square foot new residential and $0.45 psf commercial construction). 20%of new housing stock is to be affordable. o Results-in four years 380 Affordable Homes were built. In Lieu Alternatives 2: Fee of$18,000 per unit or$75 multiplied by 20%of the total floor area of a market rate unit; half of affordable units may be built off-site; land dedication option. Boulder collected $1.5 million in fee-in-lieu payments from 50 developments. This fund subsidized the creation of 80 affordable units each year. Incentive Zoning • Seattle, WA Incentive Zoning— 6 Workforce and Affordable Housing Programs and Results o Developers can boost the size of any commercial or residential building by adding affordable units. Example: the building is 8 stories and the developer is willing to add 2 more floors bringing the development to 10 stories. If the floors to be added are "rent controlled" or workforce "priced" the development will be approved. Results - 700 Affordable Workforce Units have been built in the last 10 years. In Lieu Alternatives: None. Community Land Trust • Sarasota, FL Community Land Trust— o A dedicated housing fund receives funding from dedicated sources such as taxes, fees and loan repayments, which create or rehabilitate Affordable Housing. Results - 608 Affordable Rental units have been built and 145 single family units in the period of 2005 through 2010. In Lieu Alternatives: None. Housing Levy • Seattle, WA Housing Levy— o Seattle has a dedicated property tax to fund affordable housing. Its first voter-approved housing levy in 1981, Seattle has funded 4 additional bonds and/or levies for these purposes. In 2009, the City passed its fifth, a 7-year dedicated property tax mill of approximately 0.17 to fund $145 million for affordable housing opportunities for low-income residents. Results - Seattle has funded more than 10,000 affordable apartments as provided loans to more than 600 first-time homebuyers and rental assistance to more than 4,000 households. In Lieu Alternatives: None. • Aspen, CO Housing Levy— o Aspen had in place a .2 percent sales tax and a 1 percent real estate transfer tax (RETT) assessed on all real estate sales above $100,000. The sales tax generates $1 million per year and the RETT (real estate transfer tax) $6 million. Results—From 2008-2012 Aspen's average annual tax revenue for its housing program was $7 million. Sources—Available upon request 7